0000874761 us-gaap:PrivateEquityFundsMember us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member us-gaap:ForeignPlanMember 2018-12-310000874761aes:AESBrasilMember2021-09-30

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
_____________________________________ 
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20182021
-OR-
¨TRANSITION REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-12291
aeslogominia01a04.jpgCommission file number 1-12291
aes-20211231_g1.jpg
THE AES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware54 116372554-1163725
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4300 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington,Virginia22203
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(703)522-1315
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per shareAESNew York Stock Exchange
Corporate UnitsAESCNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d)15(d) of the Act. Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).   Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerx
Accelerated filer¨
Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o     No  x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates on June 29, 2018,30, 2021, the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter (based on the adjusted closing sale price of $13.05$26.07 of the Registrant's Common Stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date) was approximately $8.63$17.37 billion.
The number of shares outstanding of Registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, on February 21, 201924, 2022 was 662,358,244.667,395,142.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Registrant's Proxy Statement for its 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference in Parts II and III





THEThe AES CORPORATION FISCAL YEAR 2018 FORMCorporation Fiscal Year 2021 Form 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents


1 | 2021 Annual Report



GLOSSARY OF TERMSGlossary of Terms
The following is a list of frequently used terms and abbreviations that appear in the text of this report and have the definitions indicated below:
Adjusted EPSAdjusted Earnings Per Share, a non-GAAP measure
Adjusted PTCAdjusted Pre-tax Contribution, a non-GAAP measure of operating performance
AESThe Parent Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates
AOCIAES AndesAccumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAES Andes S.A., formerly AES Gener
AOCLAES BrasilAES Tietê Energia S.A., formerly branded as AES Tietê
AES IndianaIndianapolis Power & Light Company, formerly branded as IPL. AES Indiana is wholly-owned by IPALCO
AES OhioThe Dayton Power & Light Company, formerly branded as DP&L. AES Ohio is wholly-owned by DPL
AES Renewable HoldingsAES Renewable Holdings, LLC, formerly branded as AES Distributed Energy
AFUDCAllowance for Funds Used During Construction
AIMCoAlberta Management Investment Corporation
ANEELBrazilian National Electric Energy Agency
AOCLAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
ASCAROAsset Retirement Obligations
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASEPNational Authority of Public Services
BACTBest Available Control Technology
BARTBest Available Retrofit Technology
BOTBESSBattery energy storage system
BOTBuild, Operate and Transfer
BTABest Technology Available
CAAUnited States
CAAU.S. Clean Air Act
CAMMESAWholesale Electric Market Administrator in Argentina
CCGTCCEEBrazilian Chamber of Electric Energy Commercialization
CCGTCombined Cycle Gas Turbine
CCRCoal Combustion Residuals, which includes bottom ash, fly ash and air pollution control wastes generated at coal-fired generation plant sites.sites
CDPQ
CDPQLa Caisse de dépôt et placement du Quebéc
CENCECLCoordinador Electrico NacionalCurrent Expected Credit Loss
CEO
CEOChief Executive Officer
CFE
CFEFederal Electricity Commission in Mexico
CHPCFOCombined Heat and PowerChief Financial Officer
COFINSContribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social
CO2
Carbon Dioxide
COSOCODCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway CommissionCommercial Operation Date
CPCapacity Performance
CPIUnited States Consumer Price Index
CPPClean Power Plan
CRESCompetitive Retail Electric Service
CSAPR
CSAPRU.S. Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
CTNGCWACompañia Transmisora del Norte Grande
CWAU.S. Clean Water Act
DG CompDirectorate-General for Competition of the European Commission
DP&LThe Dayton Power & Light Company
DPLDPL Inc.
DPLERDPL Energy Resources, Inc.
DPP
DPLDPL Inc.
DPPDominican Power Partners
EBITDAEarnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization
EPAUnited States
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPCEngineering, Procurement, and Construction
ERCOT
ERCOTElectric Reliability Council of Texas
ESPElectric Security Plan
EUEuropean Union
EURIBOR
EURIBOREuro Inter Bank Offered Rate
EUSGUElectric Utility Steam Generating Unit
EVNElectricity of Vietnam
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERC
FERCU.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FONINVEMEM
FluenceFluence Energy, Inc and its subsidiaries, including Fluence Energy, LLC, which was previously our joint venture with Siemens (NASDAQ: FLNC)
FONINVEMEMFund for the Investment Needed to Increase the Supply of Electricity in the Wholesale Market in Argentina
FPAU.S. Federal Power Act
FXForeign Exchange
GAAP
GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
GDPRGeneral Data Protection Regulation
GHGGreenhouse Gas
GILTIGlobal Intangible Low Taxed Income
GRIDCOGSFGrid Corporation of Odisha Ltd.Generation Scaling Factor
GWhGWGigawatt HoursGigawatts
HLBVGWhGigawatt Hours
HLBVHypothetical Liquidation Book Value
IDEMIndiana Department of Environmental Management
ITCImputed Tax Credit
IPALCOIPALCO Enterprises, Inc.


IPLIDEMIndiana Indianapolis Power & Light CompanyDepartment of Environmental Management
IPP


2 | 2021 Annual Report

IPALCOIPALCO Enterprises, Inc.
IPPIndependent Power Producers
I-SEMIntegrated Single Electricity Market
ISO
ISOIndependent System Operator
IURCITCInvestment Tax Credit
IURCIndiana Utility Regulatory Commission
LIBOR
LIBORLondon Inter Bank Offered Rate
LNGLiquefied Natural Gas
MATSMercury and Air Toxics Standards
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MREMMBtuMillion British Thermal Units
MREEnergy Reallocation Mechanism
MWMegawatts
MWhMWMegawatt HoursMegawatts
NAAQSMWhMegawatt Hours
NAAQSU.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NCINoncontrolling Interest
NCRENon-Conventional Renewable Energy
NEKNatsionalna Elektricheska Kompania (state-owned electricity public supplier in Bulgaria)
NEPCONational Electric Power Company
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NMNot Meaningful
NOVNMNot Meaningful
NOVNotice of Violation
NOX
Nitrogen Dioxide
NPDESNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NSPSNew Source Performance Standards
O&MOperations and Maintenance
OERCOrissa Electricity Regulatory Commission
ONSNational System Operator in Brazil
OPGCOdisha Power Generation Corporation, Ltd.
OTC PolicyStatewide Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling
OVECOhio Valley Electric Corporation, an electric generating company in which AES Ohio has a 4.9% interest
Parent CompanyThe AES Corporation
PCU
PCUPerformance Cash Units
Pet CokePetroleum Coke
PISPartially Integrated System
PJMPJM Interconnection, LLC
PMParticulate Matter
PPAPower Purchase Agreement
PREPAPuerto Rico Electric Power Authority
PSDPrevention of Significant Deterioration
PSU
PSUPerformance Stock Unit
PUCOThe Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
PURPAU.S. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
QFQualifying Facility
RMRRRoutine Maintenance, Repair and Replacement
RSURestricted Stock Unit
RTORegional Transmission Organization
SADIArgentine Interconnected System
SBUStrategic Business Unit
SCESouthern California Edison
SECUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission
SEMSingle Electricity Market
SENSistema Electrico Nacional
SICCentral Interconnected Electricity System
SINNational Interconnected System
SINGNorthern Interconnected Electricity System
SIPState Implementation Plan
SNENational Secretary of Energy
SO2
Sulfur Dioxide
SSOStandard Service Offer
SWRCBCalifornia State Water Resources Board
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act 
TECONSTerm Convertible Preferred Securities
U.S.United States
UKUnited Kingdom
USDU.S. dollar


VAT
QIAQatar Investment Authority
RSURestricted Stock Unit
RTORegional Transmission Organization
SADIArgentine Interconnected System
SBUStrategic Business Unit
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SEETSignificantly Excessive Earnings Test
SENSistema Electrico Nacional in Chile
SINNational Interconnected System in Colombia
SIPState Implementation Plan
SO2
Sulfur Dioxide
SWRCBCalifornia State Water Resources Board
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act
TDSICTransmission, Distribution, and Storage System Improvement Charge
U.S.United States
USDUnited States Dollar
VATValue Added Tax
VIEVariable Interest Entity
VinacominVietnam National Coal-Mineral Industries Holding Corporation Ltd.
YPFArgentina state-owned gas company



3 | 2021 Annual Report

PART I
In this Annual Report the terms “AES,” “the Company,” “us,” or “we” refer to The AES Corporation and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates, collectively. The terms “The AES Corporation” and “Parent Company” refer only to the parent, publicly held holding company, The AES Corporation, excluding its subsidiaries and affiliates.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATIONForward-Looking Information and Risk Factor Summary
In this filing we make statements concerning our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or performance. Such statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, we cannot assure you that they will prove to be correct.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and there are factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. Some of those factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this report and in subsequent securities filings) include:
the economic climate, particularly the state of the economy in the areas in which we operate and the state of the economy in China, which impacts demand for electricity in many of our key markets, including the fact that the global economy faces considerable uncertainty for the foreseeable future, which further increases many of the risks discussed in this Form 10-K;
changes in inflation, demand for power, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, including our ability to hedge our interest rate and foreign currency risk;
changes in the price of electricity at which our generation businesses sell into the wholesale market and our utility businesses purchase to distribute to their customers, and the success of our risk management practices, such as our ability to hedge our exposure to such market price risk;
changes in the prices and availability of coal, gas and other fuels (including our ability to have fuel transported to our facilities) and the success of our risk management practices, such as our ability to hedge our exposure to such market price risk, and our ability to meet credit support requirements for fuel and power supply contracts;
changes in and access to the financial markets, particularly changes affecting the availability and cost of capital in order to refinance existing debt and finance capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments and other corporate purposes;
our ability to fulfill our obligations, manage liquidity and comply with covenants under our recourse and non-recourse debt, including our ability to manage our significant liquidity needs and to comply with covenants under our senior securedrevolving credit facility and other existing financing obligations;
our ability to receive funds from our subsidiaries by way of dividends, fees, interest, loans or otherwise;
changes in our or any of our subsidiaries' corporate credit ratings or the ratings of our or any of our subsidiaries' debt securities or preferred stock, and changes in the rating agencies' ratings criteria;
our ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other attractive terms;
our ability to compete in markets where we do business;
our ability to operate power generation, distribution and transmission facilities, including managing availability, outages and equipment failures;
our ability to manage our operational and maintenance costs and the performance and reliability of our generating plants, including our ability to reduce unscheduled down times;
our ability to enter into long-term contracts, which limit volatility in our results of operations and cash flow, such as PPAs, fuel supply, and other agreements and to manage counterparty credit risks in these agreements;
variations in weather, especially mild winters and cooler summers in the areas in which we operate, the occurrence of difficult hydrological conditions for our hydropower plants, as well as hurricanes and other storms and disasters, wildfires and low levels of wind or sunlight for our wind and solar facilities;
pandemics, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious disease, including the COVID-19 pandemic;
the performance of our contracts by our contract counterparties, including suppliers or customers;


4 | 2021 Annual Report

severe weather and natural disasters;
our ability to manage global supply chain disruptions;
our ability to raise sufficient capital to fund development projects or to successfully execute our development projects;
the success of our initiatives in other renewable energy projects and energy storage projects;


the availability of government incentives or policies that support the development of renewable energy generation projects;
our ability to keep up with advances in technology;
growthchanges in number of customers or in customer usage;
the operations of our joint ventures and equity method investments that we do not control;
our ability to achieve reasonable rate treatment in our utility businesses;
changes in laws, rules and regulations affecting our international businesses, particularly in developing countries;
changes in laws, rules and regulations affecting our utilities businesses, including, but not limited to, regulations which may affect competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other potential stranded costs by our utilities;
changes in law resulting from new local, state, federal or international energy legislation and changes in political or regulatory oversight or incentives affecting our wind business and solar projects, our other renewables projects and our initiatives in GHG reductions and energy storage, including government policies or tax incentives;
changes in environmental laws, including requirements for reduced emissions, GHG legislation, regulation, and/or treaties and CCR regulation and remediation;
changes in tax laws, including U.S. tax reform, and challenges to our tax positions;
the effects of litigation and government and regulatory investigations;
the performance of our acquisitions;
our ability to maintain adequate insurance;
decreases in the value of pension plan assets, increases in pension plan expenses, and our ability to fund defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans at our subsidiaries;
losses on the sale or write-down of assets due to impairment events or changes in management intent with regard to either holding or selling certain assets;
changes in accounting standards, corporate governance and securities law requirements;
our ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting;
our ability to attract and retain talented directors, management and other personnel, including, but not limited to, financial personnel in our foreign businesses that have extensive knowledge of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; andpersonnel;
cyber-attacks and information security breaches.breaches; and
data privacy.
These factors, in addition to others described elsewhere in this Form 10-K, including those described under Item 1A.—Risk Factors, and in subsequent securities filings, should not be construed as a comprehensive listing of factors that could cause results to vary from our forward-looking information.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. If one or more forward-looking statements are updated, no inference should be drawn that additional updates will be made with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.



ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Item 1.—Business is an outline of our strategy and our businesses by SBU, including key financial drivers. Additional items that may have an impact on our businesses are discussed in Item 1A.—Risk Factors and Item 3.—Legal Proceedings.



5 | 2021 Annual Report

Executive Summary
Incorporated in 1981, AES is a power generationglobal energy company accelerating the future of energy. Together with our many stakeholders, we are improving lives by delivering the greener, smarter energy solutions the world needs. Our diverse workforce is committed to continuous innovation and utility company, providing affordable, sustainableoperational excellence, while partnering with our customers on their strategic energy throughtransitions and continuing to meet their energy needs today.
aes-20211231_g2.jpg
Our Strategy
AES is an industry leader in developing and growing the solutions that will enable the transition to low-carbon sources of energy and achievement of the Paris Agreement's goal of net-zero emissions by 2050.
Today we see an enormous business opportunity from the once-in-a-lifetime transformation of the electricity sector driven by decarbonization, electrification, and digitalization. There is a substantial need for more renewable energy as well as an opportunity for innovation to develop new products and solutions that help customers accomplish their individual decarbonization goals.
At the core of AES' strategy is a dual focus on: (1) growing our diverse portfolio of thermallow-carbon products and solutions; and (2) working to develop and incubate new solutions and business models which will help drive change in the industry in the future.
In 2021, we signed long-term contracts for approximately 5 GW of renewable generation facilities and distribution businesses. Our mission is to improve lives by accelerating a safer and greener energy future. We do this by leveragingpower, bringing our unique electricity platforms and the knowledge of our people to provide the energy and infrastructure solutions our customers need. Our people share a passion to help meet the world's current and increasing energy needs, while providing communities and countries the opportunity for economic growth through the availability of reliable, affordable electric power.
aesinfo225.jpg
Overview of Our Strategy
Future growth across our company will be heavily weighted toward less carbon-intensive wind, solar and natural gas generation and infrastructure. Our robust backlog of projects under construction or under— those with signed PPAs continuescontracts, but which are not yet in operation — to increase, driven by9.2 GW. Our backlog serves as the core component of future growth.
Central to our renewables growth strategy is a focus on select markets where we can take advantagecustomer collaboration and co-creation, which helps us develop unique solutions based on specific customer needs. This approach not only contributes to customer satisfaction and repeat business, but it also allows AES to work with key customers on a bilateral basis rather than just through participation in bid processes.
This approach has led to the co-creation of our global scale and synergies with our existing businesses.several first-of-its-kind industry innovations, including an agreement to supply 24/7 carbon-free energy for Google's data centers in Virginia, ensuring that the energy powering those data centers will be 90% carbon-free when measured on an hourly basis. In 2018,2021, we signed long-term PPAs fora total of approximately 2 GW of capacity and we areother innovative structures with various customers on pace to sign 2 to 3 GW of new PPAs annually through 2022.a bilateral basis.


6 | 2021 Annual Report

We are also working on enhancingwith some of our current contracts by blending and extending existing PPAs and by addingthe world's largest mining companies in their transition to renewable energy. We call this approachenergy in South America, essentially reducing the emissions of major supply chains. One way in which we are serving the mining industry is through our Green Blend offering, in which we work to integrate renewable energy with thermal power during select hours of the day, reducing overall thermal generation and Extend. lowering emissions.
With thisour utilities, we are working with a broad range of stakeholders to transition to lower carbon forms of energy while promoting a Just Transition for the workers and communities who may be negatively impacted by the closure of fossil fuel facilities. At AES Indiana, for example, we are working to retire an additional 415 MW of conventional generation by 2023, while adding new solar and energy storage to the grid.
Our renewable growth strategy includes taking steps to ensure and enable growth in future years. We massively expanded our pipeline of development projects, which grew 70% to more than 55 GW at the end of 2021, both through acquisitions and increased investment in development activities, such as securing land or advancing permitting and interconnection processes. For our projects in late-stage development, we leverageworked to secure supplier arrangements to avoid any potential delays in relation to industry shortages, aided by our existing platforms, contractsscale, supplier relationships, and relationshipsadvanced planning measures.
We are also developing and incubating new technologies that add value today and will drive our business in the future. We understand that the energy industry is changing rapidly, and aim to negotiate new long-term renewable PPAs with higher returns than we would otherwise achieve throughproactively seek solutions that will give us a bidding process. We see potential opportunities to execute this strategy across manycontinued competitive advantage. At the core of our markets, including Chile, Mexicoinnovation strategy is AES Next, our business and the United States.technology incubator. AES Next works to identify new and innovative business ventures that provide leading-edge and greener energy solutions.
In Hawaii, we are delivering pioneering solar plus storage facilities, which will serve baseload energy needs, including satisfying demand with renewable power 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
We have two LNG regasification terminals in Central America and the Caribbean, with a total of 150 TBTU of LNG storage capacity. These terminals were built to supply not only the gas for our co-located combined cycle


plants, but also to meet the growing demand for natural gasAES Next identifies upcoming trends in the region.industry and opportunities for innovation. From there, we either develop capabilities in house or make strategic investments in third-party ventures, targeting those in which we see benefit to our overall portfolio and where we believe AES can add value.
In Panama,2021 Strategic Highlights
We completed construction or the storage tank at our recently inaugurated Colon power plant and regasification terminal is expected to come on-line in mid-2019. We believe there is significant potential upside associated with increasing utilization beyond the requirementsacquisition of our co-located power plant.
As a result of our efforts to decrease our exposure to coal-fired generation and increase our portfolio2,079 MW of renewables and energy storage, primarily including:
1,129 MW of solar, wind and energy storage in the U.S.;
859 MW of hydro, wind, energy storage and natural gas capacity, we are significantly reducing our carbon dioxide emissions per MWhsolar in Chile, Brazil, and Colombia; and
91 MW of generation. Under our current strategy, we anticipate a reductionsolar in Panama and the Dominican Republic
We signed 4,965 MW of carbon intensity levels of 50% from 2016 to 2022renewables and of 70% from 2016 to 2030.
We are a leader in deploying new technologies, such as battery-based energy storage drone applications and digital customer interfaces. The Company'sunder long-term PPAs, including:
3,677 MW of wind, solar, energy storage, joint venture with Siemens, Fluence, has now delivered or been awarded 80 projectsand hydro in 18 countries, with a total capacitythe U.S. and El Salvador;
799 MW of 766 MW.wind in Brazil;
Strategic Highlights334 MW of wind, energy storage, and solar in Chile and Colombia; and
We continue to improve155 MW of solar in Panama and the returns from our existing portfolio and position AES for long-term, sustainable growth.Dominican Republic
In 2018, the Company paid down $1 billion in Parent debt
Reduced Parent debt by 22%, to $3.7 billion, compared to December 31, 2017
In December 2018, the Company achieved a key investment grade financial metric of 3.95x Parent leverage one year earlier than previously planned
As of December 31, 2018, the Company'sOur backlog of 5,7879,239 MW includes:
3,841 MW under construction and coming on-line through 2021; and
1,946 MW of renewables signed under long-term PPAs
In 2018, the Company agreed to sell approximately 48% of its interest in sPower's operating portfolio
Once these sales close, AES' ownership in sPower's operating portfolio will decrease from 50% to approximately 26%
In 2018, the Company signed long-term agreements to sell 25 TBTU of LNG annually in the Dominican Republic, which will contribute to growth beyond 2020
In 2018, Fluence was awarded 2863,497 MW under construction and coming online through 2024; and
5,742 MW of new projects
chart-faf74e9eb4d95d07a2d.jpg
_____________________________
(1)
Investments in subsidiaries excludes $2.2 billion investment in DPL
(2)
Excludes working capital adjustments and growth activity prior to the close of the acquisition.



Segments
We are organized into four market-oriented SBUs: US and Utilities (United States, Puerto Rico and El Salvador); South America (Chile, Colombia, Argentina and Brazil); MCAC (Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean); and Eurasia (Europe and Asia)— which are led by our SBU Presidents. During the first quarter of 2018, the Andes and Brazil SBUs were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported together as part of the South America SBU. Further, the Puerto Rico and El Salvador businesses, formerly part of the MCAC SBU, were combined with the US SBU, which is now reported as the US and Utilities SBU. Within our four SBUs, we have two lines of business. The first business line is generation, where we own and/or operate power plants to generate and sell power to customers, such as utilities, industrial users, and other intermediaries. The second business line is utilities, where we own and/or operate utilities to generate or purchase, distribute, transmit and sell electricity to end-user customers in the residential, commercial, industrial and governmental sectors within a defined service area. In certain circumstances, our utilities also generate and sell electricity on the wholesale market.renewables signed under long-term PPAs
We measureFluence completed its Initial Public Offering ("IPO") in November 2021, and following the operating performance ofIPO, our SBUs using Adjusted PTC, a non-GAAP measure. The Adjusted PTC by SBU for the year ended December 31, 2018ownership interest is shown below. The percentages for Adjusted PTC are the contribution by each SBU to the gross metric, i.e., the total Adjusted PTC by SBU, before deductions for Corporate. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis of this Form 10-K for reconciliation and definitions of Adjusted PTC.approximately 34%
chart-80005bbd70d75686826.jpgchart-1ae90dcbc7be532ba23.jpg
The following summarizes our businesses within our four SBUs.



usutila11.jpg
southamericaa09.jpg



mcaca20.jpg
eurasiaa11.jpg
Overview
Generation
We currently own and/or operate a generation portfolio of 31,79231,459 MW, including onegeneration from our integrated utility.utility, AES Indiana. Our generation fleet is diversified by fuel type. See discussion below under Fuel Costs.
Performance drivers of our generation businesses include types of electricity sales agreements, plant reliability and flexibility, availability of generation capacity to meet contracted sales, fuel costs, seasonality, weather variations, and economic activity, fixed-cost management, and competition.



7 | 2021 Annual Report

Contract Sales — Most of our generation businesses sell electricity under medium- or long-term contracts ("contract sales") or under short-term agreements in competitive markets ("short-term sales"). Our medium-term contract sales have terms of two to five years, while our long-term contracts have terms of more than five years.
In contract sales, our generation businessesContracts requiring fuel to generate energy, such as natural gas or coal, are structured to recover variable costs, including fuel and variable O&M costs, either through direct or indexation-based contractual pass-throughs or tolling arrangements. When the contract does not include a fuel pass-through, we typically hedge fuel costs or enter into fuel or energy supply agreements for a similar contract period (see discussion below under Fuel Costs). These contracts are intended to reduce exposure to the volatility of fuel and electricity prices by linking the business's revenues and costs. These contracts also help us to fund a significant portion of the total capital cost of the project through long-term non-recourse project-level financing.
Capacity Payments in Contract Sales — Most of our contract salesCertain contracts include a capacity paymentpayments that coverscover projected fixed costs of the plant, including fixed O&M expenses, debt service, and a return on capital invested. In addition, most of our contracts require that the majority of the capacity paymentpayments be denominated in the currency matching our fixed costs.
Contracts that do not have significant fuel cost or do not contain a capacity payment are structured based on long-term spot prices with some negotiated pass-through costs, allowing us to recover expected fixed and variable costs as well as provide a return on investment.
These contracts are intended to reduce exposure to the volatility of fuel and electricity prices by linking the business's revenues and costs. We generally structure our business to eliminate or reduce foreign exchange risk by matching the currency of revenue and expenses, including fixed costs and debt. Our project debt may consist of both fixed and floating rate debt for which we typically hedge a significant portion of our exposure. Some of our contracted businesses also receive a regulated market-based capacity payment, which is discussed in more detail in the Short-Term Sales and Capacity Payments sectionssection below.
Thus, these contracts, or other related commercial arrangements, significantly mitigate our exposure to changes in power and, as applicable, fuel prices, currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates. In addition, these contracts generally provide for a recovery of our fixed operating expenses and a return on our investment, as long as we operate the plant to the reliability and efficiency standards required in the contract.
Short-Term Sales — Our other generation businesses sell power and ancillary services under short-term contracts with average terms of less than two years, including spot sales, directly in the short-term market or at regulated prices. The short-term markets are typically administered by a system operator to coordinate dispatch. Short-term markets generally operate on merit order dispatch, where the least expensive generation facilities, based upon variable cost or bid price, are dispatched first and the most expensive facilities are dispatched last. The short-term price is typically set at the marginal cost of energy or bid price (the cost of the last plant required to meet system demand). As a result, the cash flows and earnings associated with these businesses are more sensitive to fluctuations in the market price for electricity. In addition, many of these wholesale markets include markets for ancillary services to support the reliable operation of the transmission system. Across our portfolio, we provide a wide array of ancillary services, including voltage support, frequency regulation and spinning reserves.
Capacity Payments Many of the short-term markets in which we operate include regulated capacity markets. These capacity markets are intended to provide additional revenue based upon availability without reliance on the energy margin from the merit order dispatch. Capacity markets are typically priced based on the cost of a new entrant and the system capacity relative to the desired level of reserve margin (generation available in excess of peak demand). Our generating facilities selling in the short-term markets typically receive capacity payments based on their availability in the market.
Plant Reliability and Flexibility — Our contract and short-term sales provide incentives to our generation plants to optimally manage availability, operating efficiency and flexibility. Capacity payments under contract sales are frequently tied to meeting minimum standards. In short-term sales, our plants must be reliable and flexible to capture peak market prices and to maximize market-based revenues. In addition, our flexibility allows us to capture ancillary service revenue while meeting local market needs.
Fuel Costs — For our thermal generation plants, fuel is a significant component of our total cost of generation. For contract sales, we often enter into fuel supply agreements to match the contract period, or we may financially hedge our fuel costs. Some of our contracts have periodic adjustmentsinclude indexation for changes in fuel cost indices.fuels. In those cases, we haveseek to match our fuel supply agreements with shorter terms to match those adjustments.the indexation. For certain projects, we have tolling arrangements where the power offtaker is responsible for the supply and cost of fuel to our plants.


8 | 2021 Annual Report

In short-term sales, we sell power at market prices that are generally reflective of the market cost of fuel at the time, and thus procure fuel supply on a short-term basis, generally designed to match up with our market sales profile. Since fuel price is often the primary determinant for power prices, the economics of projects with short-term sales are often subject to volatility of relative fuel prices. For further information regarding commodity price risk please see Item 7A.—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in this Form 10-K.

43% of the capacity of our generation plants are fueled by renewables, including hydro, solar, wind, energy storage, biomass and landfill gas, which do not have significant fuel costs.

37%32% of the capacity of our generation plants are fueled by natural gas. Generally, we use gas from local suppliers in each market. A few exceptions to this are AES GenerAndes in Chile, where we purchase imported gas from third parties, and our plants in the Dominican Republic and Panama, where we import LNG to utilize in the local market.
31%23% of the capacity of our generation fleet is coal-fired. In the U.S., most of our coal-fired plants are supplied from domestic coal. At our non-U.S. generation plants, and at our plantplants in Hawaii and Puerto Rico, we source coal internationally. Across our fleet, we utilize our global sourcing program to maximize the purchasing power of our fuel procurement.
29% of the capacity of our generation plants are fueled by renewables, including hydro, solar, wind, energy storage, biomass and landfill gas, which do not have significant fuel costs.
3%2% of the capacity of our generation fleet utilizes pet coke, diesel or oil for fuel. OilWe source oil and diesel are sourced locally at prices linked to international markets, whilemarkets. We largely source pet coke is largely sourced from Mexico and the U.S.
Seasonality, Weather Variations and Economic Activity — Our generation businesses are affected by seasonal weather patterns and, therefore, operating margin is not generated evenly throughout the year. Additionally, weather variations, including temperature, solar and wind resources, and hydrological conditions, may also have an impact on generation output at our renewable generation facilities. In competitive markets for power, local economic activity can also have an impact on power demand and short-term prices for power.
Fixed-Cost Management In our businesses with long-term contracts, the majority of the fixed O&M costs are recovered through the capacity payment. However, for all generation businesses, managing fixed costs and reducing them over time is a driver of business performance.
Competition — For our businesses with medium- or long-term contracts, there is limited competition during the term of the contract. For short-term sales, plant dispatch and the price of electricity are determined by market competition and local dispatch and reliability rules.
Utilities
Our utility businesses consist of AES Indiana and AES Ohio in the U.S. and four utilities in El Salvador. AES' six utility businesses distribute power to 2.42.6 million people in two countries.and AES' two utilities in the U.S. also include generation capacity totaling 4,1023,720 MW. Our
AES Indiana,our fully integrated utility, businesses consistand AES Ohio, our transmission and distribution regulated utility, operate as the sole distributors of IPL (an integrated utility)electricity within their respective jurisdictions. AES Indiana owns and DP&L (transmissionoperates all of the facilities necessary to generate, transmit and distribution) indistribute electricity. AES Ohio owns and operates all of the U.S.,facilities necessary to transmit and four utilitiesdistribute electricity. At our distribution business in El Salvador, (distribution).we face limited competition due to significant barriers to enter the market. According to El Salvador's regulation, large regulated customers have the option of becoming unregulated users and requesting service directly from generation or commercialization agents.
In general, our utilities sell electricity directly to end-users, such as homes and businesses, and bill customers directly. Key performance drivers for utilities include the regulated rate of return and tariff, seasonality, weather variations, economic activity and reliability of service and competition.service. Revenue from utilities is classified as regulated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Regulated Rate of Return and Tariff — In exchange for the right to sell or distribute electricity in a service territory, our utility businesses are subject to government regulation. This regulation sets the framework for the prices ("tariffs") that our utilities are allowed to charge customers for electricity and establishes service standards that we are required to meet.
Our utilities are generally permitted to earn a regulated rate of return on assets, determined by the regulator based on the utility's allowed regulatory asset base, capital structure and cost of capital. The asset base on which the utility is permitted a return is determined by the regulator, within the framework of applicable local laws, and is


9 | 2021 Annual Report

based on the amount of assets that are considered used and useful in serving customers. Both the allowed return and the asset base are important components of the utility's earning power. The allowed rate of return and operating expenses deemed reasonable by the regulator are recovered through the regulated tariff that the utility charges to its customers.
The tariff may be reviewed and reset by the regulator from time to time depending on local regulations, or the utility may seek a change in its tariffs. The tariff is generally based upon usage level and may include a pass-through of costs that are not controlled by the utility, such as the costs of fuel (in the case of integrated utilities) and/or the costs of purchased energy, to the customer. Components of the tariff that are directly passed through to the customer are usually adjusted through a summary regulatory process or an existing formula-based mechanism. In some regulatory regimes, customers with demand above an established level are unregulated and can choose to contract directly with the utility or with other retail energy suppliers directly and pay non-bypassable fees, which are fees to the distribution company for use of its distribution system.
The regulated tariff generally recognizes that our utility businesses should recover certain operating and fixed costs, as well as manage uncollectible amounts, quality of service and technical and non-technical losses. Utilities, therefore, need to manage costs to the levels reflected in the tariff, or risk non-recovery of costs or diminished returns.
Seasonality, Weather Variations, and Economic Activity — Our utility businesses are generally affected by seasonal weather patterns and, therefore, operating margin is not generated evenly throughout the year. Additionally, weather


variations may also have an impact based on the number of customers, temperature variances from normal conditions, and customers' historic usage levels and patterns. Retail sales, after adjustments for weather variations, are also affected by changes in local economic activity, energy efficiency and distributed generation initiatives, as well as the number of retail customers.
Reliability of Service — Our utility businesses must meet certain reliability standards, such as duration and frequency of outages. Those standards may be explicit, with defined performance incentives or penalties, or implicit, where the utility must operate to meet customer and/or regulator expectations.
Competition — Our fully integrated utility, IPL, and our transmission and distribution regulated utility, DP&L, operate as the sole distributors of electricity within their respective jurisdictions. IPL owns and operates all of the businesses and facilities necessary to generate, transmit and distribute electricity. DP&L owns and operates all of the businesses and facilities necessary to transmit and distribute electricity. Competition in the regulated electricity business is primarily from the on-site generation for industrial customers. IPL is exposed to the volatility in wholesale prices to the extent our generating capacity exceeds the native load served under the regulated tariff and short-term contracts. However, effective with the approval of the 2018 IPL rate order in December, annual wholesale margins earned above or below a certain benchmark are shared with customers, thus mitigating this volatility. See the full discussion under the US and Utilities SBU.
At our distribution business in El Salvador, we face limited competition due to significant barriers to enter the market. According to El Salvador's regulation, large regulated customers have the option of becoming unregulated users and requesting service directly by the generation or commercialization agents.
Development and Construction
We develop and construct new generation facilities. For our utility business, new plants may be built or existing plants retrofitted in response to customer needs or to comply with regulatory developments. The projects are developed subject to regulatory approval that permits recovery of our capital cost and a return on our investment. For our generation businesses, our priority for development is platform expansion opportunities,in key growth markets, where we can add on toleverage our global scale and synergies with our existing facilities in our key platform markets where we have a competitive advantage.businesses by adding renewable energy. We make the decision to invest in new projects by evaluating the strategic fit, project returns and financial profile against a fair risk-adjusted return for the investment and against alternative uses of capital, including corporate debt repayment and share buybacks.repayment.
In some cases, we enter into long-term contracts for output from new facilities prior to commencing construction. To limit required equity contributions from The AES Corporation, we also seek non-recourse project debt financing and other sources of capital, including partners, wherewhen it is commercially attractive. We typically contract with a third party to manage construction, although our construction management team supervises the construction work and tracks progress against the project's budget and the required safety, efficiency and productivity standards.
Segments
The segment reporting structure uses the Company's management reporting structure as its foundation to reflect how the Company manages the business internally. Itbusinesses internally and is mainly organized by geographic regions which provideprovides a socio-political-economic understanding of our business.


10 | 2021 Annual Report

We are organized into four market-oriented SBUs: US and Utilities (United States, Puerto Rico and El Salvador); South America (Chile, Colombia, Argentina and Brazil); MCAC (Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean); and Eurasia (Europe and Asia)— which are led by our SBU Presidents. We have two lines of business: generation and utilities. Each of our SBUs participates in our first business line, generation, in which we own and/or operate power plants to generate and sell power to customers, such as utilities, industrial users, and other intermediaries. Our US and Utilities SBU participates in our second business line, utilities, in which we own and/or operate utilities to generate or purchase, distribute, transmit and sell electricity to end-user customers in the residential, commercial, industrial and governmental sectors within a defined service area. In certain circumstances, our utilities also generate and sell electricity on the wholesale market.
We measure the operating performance of our SBUs using Adjusted PTC, a non-GAAP measure. The Adjusted PTC by SBU for the year ended December 31, 2021 is shown below. The percentages for Adjusted PTC are the contribution by each SBU to the gross metric, i.e., the total Adjusted PTC by SBU, before deductions for Corporate. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis of this Form 10-K for reconciliation and definitions of Adjusted PTC.
aes-20211231_g3.jpgaes-20211231_g4.jpg
For financial reporting purposes, the Company's corporate activities and certain other investments are reported within "Corporate and Other" because they do not require separate disclosure. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 15—18—Segment and Geographic Information included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further discussion of the Company's segment structure.


11 | 2021 Annual Report

aes-20211231_g5.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.


12 | 2021 Annual Report


US AND UTILITIESand Utilities SBU
Our US and Utilities SBU has 2941 generation facilities, two utilities in the United States, and four utilities in El Salvador.
Generation — Operating installed capacity of our US and Utilities SBU totals 11,57412,932 MW. IPALCO (IPL's(AES Indiana's parent), DP&L,AES Ohio, and DPL Inc. (DP&L's(AES Ohio's parent) are all SEC registrants, and as such, follow the public filing requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following table lists our US and Utilities SBU generation facilities:


Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)
Bosforo El Salvador Solar 43
 50% 2018 2043 EEO
AES Nejapa El Salvador Landfill Gas 6
 100% 2011 2035 CAESS
Moncagua El Salvador Solar 3
 100% 2015 2035 EEO
El Salvador Subtotal     52
        
Southland—Alamitos US-CA Gas 2,075
 100% 1998 2019-2020 Southern California Edison
Southland—Redondo Beach US-CA Gas 1,392
 100% 1998 2020 EDF Energy, LLC, Clean Power Alliance of Southern California
sPower (1)
 US-Various Solar 1,081
 50% 2017-2018 2028-2046 Various
AES Puerto Rico US-PR Coal 524
 100% 2002 2027 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
Southland—Huntington Beach US-CA Gas 474
 100% 1998 2019-2020 Southern California Edison
Shady Point (2)
 US-OK Coal 360
 100% 1991 
 
Buffalo Gap II (3)
 US-TX Wind 233
 100% 2007 
 
Hawaii US-HI Coal 206
 100% 1992 2022 Hawaiian Electric Co.
Warrior Run US-MD Coal 205
 100% 2000 2030 First Energy
Buffalo Gap III (3)
 US-TX Wind 170
 100% 2008 
 
sPower (1)
 US-Various Wind 140
 50% 2017 2036 Various
AES Distributed Energy (AES DE) (3)
 US-Various Solar 136
 100% 2015-2018 2029-2042 Utility, Municipality, Education, Non-Profit
Buffalo Gap I (3)
 US-TX Wind 117
 100% 2006 2021 Direct Energy
Laurel Mountain US-WV Wind 98
 100% 2011 
 
Mountain View I & II US-CA Wind 65
 100% 2008 2021 Southern California Edison
Mountain View IV US-CA Wind 49
 100% 2012 2032 Southern California Edison
Lawa'i (AES DE) (3)
 US-HI Solar 20
 100% 2018 2043 Kaua'i Island Utility Cooperative
  Energy Storage 20
    
Ilumina US-PR Solar 24
 100% 2012 2032 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
Laurel Mountain ES US-WV Energy Storage 16
 100% 2011 
 
AES Gilbert (Salt River) US-AZ Energy Storage 10
 100% 2019 2039 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District
Warrior Run ES US-MD Energy Storage 5
 100% 2016 
 
United States Subtotal     7,420
        
      7,472
        
_____________________________
(1)
Unconsolidated entity, accounted for as an equity affiliate.13 | 2021 Annual Report

BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
Bosforo (1)
El SalvadorSolar100 50 %2018-20192043-2044CAESS, EEO, CLESA, DEUSEM
Cuscatlan SolarEl SalvadorSolar10 100 %20212046CLESA
AES NejapaEl SalvadorLandfill Gas100 %20112035CAESS
OpicoEl SalvadorSolar100 %20202040CLESA
MoncaguaEl SalvadorSolar100 %20152035EEO
El Salvador Subtotal123 
Southland—AlamitosUS-CAGas1,200 100 %19982023Various
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo A (1))
US-VariousSolar967 26 %2017-20192028-2046Various
Wind140 
Southland—Redondo BeachUS-CAGas876 100 %19982023Various
Southland Energy—Alamitos (2)
US-CAGas697 65 %20202040Southern California Edison
Southland Energy—Huntington Beach(2)
US-CAGas694 65 %20202040Southern California Edison
New York WindUS-NYWind612 75 %2021NYISO
AES Puerto RicoUS-PRCoal524 100 %20022027Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
Highlander (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-VASolar485 50 %20202035Apple, Akami, Etsy, Microsoft
AES Clean Energy (AES Renewable Holdings) (3)
US-VariousSolar415 100 %2015-20212029-2042Utility, Municipality, Education, Non-Profit
Energy Storage104 
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo B (1))
US-VariousSolar260 50 %20192039-2044Various
Southland—Huntington BeachUS-CAGas236 100 %19982023Various
Buffalo Gap II (3)
US-TXWind228 100 %2007
Hawaii (4)
US-HICoal206 100 %19922022Hawaiian Electric Co.
Warrior RunUS-MDCoal205 100 %20002030Potomac Edison
Prevailing Winds (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-SDWind200 50 %20202050Prevailing Winds
Buffalo Gap III (3)
US-TXWind170 100 %2008
Buffalo Gap I (3)
US-TXWind108 100 %2006
Southland Energy—Alamitos Energy Center (2)
US-CAEnergy Storage100 65 %20212041Southern California Edison
East Line Solar (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-AZSolar100 50 %20202045Salt River Project
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo C (1))
US-VariousSolar100 50 %20212046Various
Laurel MountainUS-WVWind98 100 %2011
Clover Creek (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-UTSolar80 50 %20212046UMPA
Mountain View I & IIUS-CAWind64 100 %20082021Southern California Edison
Mountain View IVUS-CAWind49 100 %20122032Southern California Edison
Lawa'i (AES Clean Energy/AES Renewable Holdings (3))
US-HISolar20 100 %20182043Kaua'i Island Utility Cooperative
Energy Storage20 
Kekaha (AES Clean Energy/AES Renewable Holdings (3))
US-HISolar14 100 %20192045Kaua'i Island Utility Cooperative
Energy Storage14 
Na Pua MakaniUS-HIWind28 100 %20202040HECO
IluminaUS-PRSolar24 100 %20122037Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority
AES Clean Energy (sPower OpCo C (1))
US-CASolar20 50 %20212041Various
Laurel Mountain ESUS-WVEnergy Storage16 100 %2011
Southland Energy—AES Gilbert (Salt River) (2)
US-AZEnergy Storage10 65 %20192039Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Warrior Run ESUS-MDEnergy Storage100 %2016
United States Subtotal9,089 
9,212 
_____________________________
(1)Unconsolidated entity, accounted for as an equity affiliate.
(2)AES was entitled to 100% of earnings or losses until March 1, 2021, and any distributions related thereto.
(3)AES owns these assets together with third-party tax equity investors with variable ownership interests. The tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes, that vary over the life of the projects. The proceeds from the issuance of tax equity are recorded as noncontrolling interest in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(4)In November 2020, announced expected retirement in 2022.


(2)
Announced the sale of this business in December 2018.14 | 2021 Annual Report
(3)
AES owns these assets together with third-party tax equity investors with variable ownership interests. The tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes, that vary over the life of the projects. The proceeds from the issuance of tax equity are recorded as noncontrolling interest in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.




Utilities — The following table lists our utilities and their generation facilities.
BusinessLocationApproximate Number of Customers Served as of 12/31/2021GWh Sold in 2021FuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began Operation
CAESSEl Salvador637,000 2,154 75 %2000
CLESAEl Salvador446,000 1,063 80 %1998
DEUSEMEl Salvador90,000 159 74 %2000
EEOEl Salvador340,000 700 89 %2000
El Salvador Subtotal1,513,000 4,076 
DPL (1)
US-OH534,000 13,837 100 %2011
IPALCO (2)
US-IN516,000 13,881 Coal/Gas/Oil/Energy Storage3,720 70 %2001
United States Subtotal1,050,000 27,718 3,720 
2,563,000 31,794 
_____________________________
(1)DPL's GWh sold in 2021 represent AES Ohio's (DPL's subsidiary) total transmission and distribution sales. DPL's wholesale revenues and AES Ohio's SSO utility revenues, which are sales to utility customers who use AES Ohio to source their electricity through a competitive bid process, were 4,214 GWh in 2021. AES Ohio also owns a 4.9% equity ownership in OVEC, an electric generating company. OVEC has two plants in Cheshire, Ohio and Madison, Indiana with a combined generation capacity of approximately 2,109 MW. AES Ohio’s share of this generation is approximately 103 MW.
(2)CDPQ owns direct and indirect interests in IPALCO which total approximately 30%. AES owns 85% of AES US Investments and AES US Investments owns 82.35% of IPALCO. AES Indiana plants: Georgetown, Harding Street, Petersburg and Eagle Valley. 20 MW of AES Indiana total is considered a transmission asset. AES Indiana retired the 230 MW Petersburg Unit 1 on May 31, 2021 and has plans to retire the 415 MW Petersburg Unit 2 in June 2023. AES Indiana issued an all-source Request for Proposal in December 2019 in order to competitively procure replacement capacity. In June 2021, AES Indiana received an order from the IURC approving the acquisition of a 195 MW solar project, which closed in December 2021 and is expected to commence operations in 2023. In November 2021, AES Indiana received an order from the IURC approving the acquisition of a 250 MW solar and 180 MWh energy storage facility to be developed and expected to commence operations in 2024.
Under construction — The following table lists our plants under construction in the US and Utilities SBU: 
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestExpected Date of Commercial Operations
AES Clean Energy (AES Renewable Holdings)US-VariousSolar247 100 %1H 2022
Energy Storage134 
Central Line (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-AZSolar100 50 %1H 2022
Skipjack (AES Clean Energy)US-VASolar175 75 %1H 2022
Lancaster Area Battery (AES Clean Energy)US-CAEnergy Storage100 75 %1H 2022
Luna (AES Clean Energy)US-CAEnergy Storage100 75 %1H 2022
Laurel Mountain Repowering (AES Clean Energy)US-WVWind98 75 %2H 2022
Mountain View Repowering (AES Clean Energy)US-CAWind66 75 %2H 2022
Michigan ConsumersUS-MISolar55 75 %1H-2H 2022
Antelope Expansion 1B (AES Clean Energy/sPower)US-CASolar18 50 %1H 2022
1,093 
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Expected Date of Commercial Operations
AES Distributed Energy (AES DE) US-Various Solar 47
 100% 1H-2H 2019
  Energy Storage 3
 100% 2H 2019
Riverhead (sPower) US-NY Solar 20
 50% 1H 2019
Bosforo El Salvador Solar 57
 50% 1H 2019
Basin Electric (sPower) US-SD Wind 220
 50% 2H 2019
San Pablo (sPower) US-CA Solar 100
 50% 2H 2019
Antelope DSR3 (sPower) US-CA Solar 20
 50% 2H 2019
Kekaha (AES DE) US-HI Solar 14
 100% 2H 2019
  Energy Storage 14
 100% 
Southland Repowering US-CA Gas 1,284
 100% 1H 2020
Na Pua Makani US-HI Wind 28
 100% 1H 2020
Alamitos Energy Center US-CA Energy Storage 100
 100% 1H 2021
      1,907
    
Utilities The following table lists our utilities and their generation facilities.majority of projects under construction have executed long-term PPAs or, as applicable, have been assigned tariffs through a regulatory process.


Business Location Approximate Number of Customers Served as of 12/31/2018 GWh Sold in 2018 Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation
CAESS El Salvador 602,000
 2,122
     75% 2000
CLESA El Salvador 404,000
 931
     80% 1998
DEUSEM El Salvador 81,000
 138
     74% 2000
EEO El Salvador 310,000
 598
     89% 2000
El Salvador Subtotal 1,397,000
 3,789
        
DPL (1)
 US-OH 525,000
 7,139
 Coal 129
 100% 2011
IPL (2)
 US-IN 498,000
 15,092
 Coal/Gas/Oil 3,973
 70% 2001
United States Subtotal 1,023,000
 22,231
   4,102
    
    2,420,000
 26,020
        
_____________________________
(1)
DPL's subsidiary, AES Ohio Generation, LLC, owned an undivided interest in Conesville Unit 4. In October 2018, the co-owner of Conesville Unit 4 announced that the plant will be retired by May 2020. DPL's subsidiary, DP&L, also owns a 4.9% equity ownership in OVEC, an electric generating company. OVEC has two plants in Cheshire, Ohio and Madison, Indiana with a combined generation capacity of approximately 2,109 MW. DP&L’s share of this generation is approximately 103 MW. DPL's GWh sold in 2018 represent DPL's wholesale revenues and DP&L's Standard Service Offer (SSO) utility revenues, which are sales to utility customers who use DP&L to source their electricity through the competitive bid process. Total transmission sales were 14,439 GWh.15 | 2021 Annual Report
(2)

CDPQ owns direct and indirect interests in IPALCO which total approximately 30%. AES owns 85% of AES US Investments and AES US Investments owns 82.35% of IPALCO. IPL plants: Georgetown, Harding Street, Petersburg and Eagle Valley. 20 MW of IPL total is considered a transmission asset.


The following map illustrates the locations of our US and Utilities facilities:
US and Utilities Businesses
usnadutilmap.jpgaes-20211231_g6.jpg
U.S. BusinessesAES Indiana
IPLBusiness Description — IPALCO is a holding company whose principal subsidiary is AES Indiana. AES Indiana is an integrated utility that is engaged primarily in generating, transmitting, distributing, and selling electric energy to retail customers in the city of Indianapolis and neighboring areas within the state of Indiana and is subject to regulatory authority—see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below. AES Indiana has an exclusive right to provide electric service to the customers in its service area, covering about 528 square miles with an estimated population of approximately 977,000 people. AES Indiana owns and operates four generating stations, all within the state of Indiana. AES Indiana’s largest generating station, Petersburg, is coal-fired, and AES Indiana retired 230 MW Petersburg Unit 1 on May 31, 2021 and has plans to retire 415 MW Petersburg Unit 2 in 2023, which would result in 630 MW of total retired economic capacity at this station (see Integrated Resource Plan below). The second largest station, Harding Street, uses natural gas and fuel oil to power combustion turbines. In addition, AES Indiana operates a 20 MW battery-based energy storage unit at Harding Street, which provides frequency response. The third station, Eagle Valley, is a CCGT natural gas plant. The fourth station, Georgetown, is a small peaking station that uses natural gas to power combustion turbines. In addition, AES Indiana helps meet its customers' energy needs with long-term contracts for the purchase of 94 MW of solar-generated electricity and 300 MW of wind-generated electricity. In December 2021, AES Indiana, through its wholly-owned subsidiary AES Indiana Devco Holdings 1, LLC, completed the acquisition of Hardy Hills Solar Energy LLC, including the development of a 195 MW solar project (the "Hardy Hills Solar Project"). In July 2021, AES Indiana, through its wholly-owned subsidiary AES Indiana Devco Holdings 2, LLC, executed an agreement to acquire a 250 MW solar and 180 MWh energy storage facility (the "Petersburg Solar Project").


16 | 2021 Annual Report

Key Financial Drivers AES Indiana's financial results are driven primarily by retail demand, weather, and maintenance costs. In addition, AES Indiana's financial results are likely to be driven by many other factors including, but not limited to:
regulatory outcomes and impacts;
the passage of new legislation, implementation of regulations, or other changes in regulation; and
timely recovery of capital expenditures.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure IPLAES Indiana is subject to comprehensive regulation by the IURC with respect to its services and facilities, retail rates and charges, the issuance of long-term securities, and certain other matters. The regulatory authority of the IURC over IPL'sAES Indiana's business is typical of regulation generally imposed by state public utility commissions. The IURC sets tariff rates for electric service provided by IPL.AES Indiana. The IURC considers all allowable costs for ratemaking purposes, including a fair return on assets used and useful to providing service to customers.
IPL'sAES Indiana's tariff rates for electric service to retail customers consist of basic rates and approved charges. In addition, IPL'sAES Indiana's rates include various adjustment mechanisms, including, but not limited to: (i) a rider to reflect changes in fuel and purchased power costs to meet IPL'sAES Indiana's retail load requirements, andreferred to as the Fuel Adjustment Charge, (ii) a rider for the timely recovery of costs incurred to comply with environmental laws and regulations. Theseregulations, including a return (iii) a rider to reflect changes in ongoing RTO costs, (iv) riders for passing through to customers wholesale sales margins and capacity sales above and below established annual benchmarks, (v) a rider for a return on and of investments for eligible TDSIC improvements, and (vi) a rider for cost recovery, lost margin recoveries and performance incentives from AES Indiana's demand side management energy efficiency programs. Each of these tariff rate components function somewhat independently of one another, and arebut the overall structure of AES Indiana's rates is subject to review at the same time asof any review of IPL'sAES Indiana's basic rates and charges. Additionally, AES Indiana's rider recoveries are reviewed through recurring filings.
IPLOn October 31, 2018, the IURC issued an order approving an uncontested settlement agreement to increase AES Indiana's annual revenues by $44 million, or 3% (the "2018 Base Rate Order"). This revenue increase primarily includes recovery through rates of costs associated with the CCGT at Eagle Valley, completed in the first half of 2018, and other construction projects. New base rates and charges became effective on December 5, 2018. The 2018 Base Rate Order was AES Indiana's most recent base rate order and also provides customers with approximately $50 million in benefits over a two-year period through a rate adjustment mechanism that began in March 2019.
AES Indiana is one of many transmission system owner members in MISO, an RTO which maintains functional control over the combined transmission systems of its members and manages one of the largest energy and ancillary services markets in the U.S. MISO operates on a meritdispatches generation assets in economic order dispatch, considering transmission constraints and other reliability issues to meet the total demand in the MISO region. IPLAES Indiana offers electricity in the MISO day-ahead and real-time markets.


Business Description — IPL is engaged primarily in generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electric energy to retail customers in the city of Indianapolis and neighboring areas within the state of Indiana. IPL has an exclusive right to provide electric service to those customers. IPL's service area covers about 528 square miles with an estimated population of approximately 950,000. IPL owns and operates four generating stations, all within the state of Indiana. IPL’s largest generating station, Petersburg, is coal-fired. The second largest station, Harding Street, uses natural gas and fuel oil to power combustion turbines. In addition, IPL operates a 20 MW battery-based energy storage unit at this location, which provides frequency response. The third station, Eagle Valley, is a newly constructed 671 MW CCGT natural gas plant. IPL took operational control and commenced commercial operations of this CCGT plant in April 2018. The fourth station, Georgetown, is a small peaking station that uses natural gas to power combustion turbines.
On October 31, 2018, the IURC issued an order approving an uncontested settlement agreement to increase IPL's annual revenues by $44 million, or 3% (the "2018 Rate Order"). The 2018 Rate Order primarily includes recovery through rates of costs associated with the CCGT at Eagle Valley, completed in the first half of 2018, and other construction projects. New base rates and charges became effective on December 5, 2018. The order also provides customers with approximately $50 million in benefits, including tax reform benefits associated with the TCJA, over a two-year period through a rate adjustment mechanism beginning in March 2019. 
Environmental Regulation — For information on compliance with environmental regulations see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
Key Financial DriversDevelopment Strategy IPL's financial results are driven primarily by retail demand, weather, and outage costs. In addition, IPL's financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
regulatory outcomes;
the passage of new legislation, implementation of regulations or other changes in regulation;
timely recovery of capital expenditures; and
to a lesser extent, wholesale and capacity prices.
Construction and Development IPL'sAES Indiana's construction program is composed of capital expenditures necessary for prudent utility operations and compliance with environmental regulations, along with discretionary investments designed to replace aging equipment or improve overall performance. Additionally, IPL is currently evaluating future investments under
Senate Enrolled Act 560, the Transmission, Distribution, and Storage System Improvement Charge ("TDSIC") statute, provides for cost recovery outside of a base rate proceeding for new or replacement electric and gas transmission, distribution, and storage projects that a public utility undertakes for the purposes of safety, reliability, system modernization, or economic development. Provisions of the TDSIC statute require that requests for recovery include a plan of at least five years and not more than seven for eligible investments. Once a plan is approved by the IURC, eighty percent of eligible costs can be recovered using a periodic rate adjustment mechanism, referred to as a TDSIC mechanism. Recoverable costs include a return on, and of, the investment, including AFUDC, post-in-service carrying charges, operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and property taxes. The remaining twenty percent of recoverable costs are deferred for future recovery in the public utility’s next base rate case. The TDSIC mechanism is capped at an annual increase of two percent of total retail revenues.
On March 4, 2020, the IURC issued an order approving the projects in AES Indiana's seven-year TDSIC Plan for eligible transmission, distribution, and storage system improvements totaling $1.2 billion from 2020 through 2026. Beginning in June 2020, AES Indiana files an annual TDSIC rate adjustment for a return on, and of, investments through March 31 with rates requested to be effective each November. Annual TDSIC plan update filings are required to be staggered by six months as ordered by the IURC and are filed each December. The total


17 | 2021 Annual Report

amount of AES Indiana’s equipment approved for TDSIC recovery as of December 31, 2021 was $160 million.
Integrated Resource Plan In December 2019, AES Indiana filed its Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP"), which electric utilities indescribes AES Indiana's Preferred Resource Portfolio for meeting generation capacity needs for serving AES Indiana's retail customers over the next several years. AES Indiana's Preferred Resource Portfolio is AES Indiana's reasonable least cost option and provides a cleaner and more diverse generation mix for customers. The IRP includes the retirement of approximately 630 MW of coal-fired generation by 2023. Based on extensive modeling, AES Indiana can recover costs (includingdetermined that the cost of operating Petersburg Units 1 and 2 exceeds the value customers receive compared to alternative resources. Retirement of these units allows the company to cost-effectively diversify the portfolio and transition to lower cost and cleaner resources while maintaining a return) for IURC approved infrastructure improvement plans.reliable system.
DPLAES Indiana retired 230 MW Petersburg Unit 1 on May 31, 2021 and has plans to retire 415 MW Petersburg Unit 2 in 2023, which will result in 630 MW of total retired economic capacity at this station. In November 2021, AES Indiana received approval from the IURC for approvals and cost recovery associated with the Petersburg retirements, which includes: (1) AES Indiana's creation of regulatory assets for the net book value of Petersburg units 1 and 2 upon retirement; (2) a method for amortization of the regulatory assets; and (3) recovery of the regulatory assets through ongoing amortization in AES Indiana’s future rate cases. The order reserves all rights of all the parties with respect to the ratemaking treatment related to the regulatory assets, including the proper rate of return and mechanisms for recovery.
AES Indiana issued an all-source Request for Proposal in December 2019, in order to competitively procure replacement capacity by June 1, 2023, which is the first year AES Indiana is expected to have a capacity shortfall. Modeling indicated that a combination of wind, solar, storage, and energy efficiency would be the lowest reasonable cost option for the replacement capacity, but AES Indiana continues to assess the type, size, and location of resources in the bids it received. In December 2021, AES Indiana completed the acquisition of the Hardy Hills Solar Project, which is a 195 MW solar project to be developed and expected to commence operations in 2023. AES Indiana received an order from the IURC approving the project in June of 2021. In July 2021, AES Indiana executed an agreement to acquire the Petersburg Solar Project, which is a 250 MW solar and 180 MWh energy storage facility expected to commence operations in 2024, and on November 24, 2021, AES Indiana received an order from the IURC approving the project.
In December 2021, AES Indiana received equity capital contributions of $275 million from AES and CDPQ on a proportional share basis to be used for funding needs related to AES Indiana’s TDSIC and replacement generation projects.
AES Ohio
Regulatory Framework and Market StructureBusiness Description — DPL is an energy holding company whose principal subsidiaries include DP&L andsubsidiary is AES Ohio. AES Ohio Generation, LLC, bothis a utility company that transmits and distributes electricity to retail customers in a 6,000 square mile area of which operate in Ohio. Electric customers withinWest Central Ohio are permittedand is subject to purchase power under contract from a CRES provider or from their local utility under SSO rates. The SSO generation supply is provided by third parties through a competitive bid process.regulatory authority—see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below. AES Ohio utilities havehas the exclusive right to provide transmission and distribution services to its customers, and procures retail standard service offer ("SSO") electric service on behalf of residential, commercial, industrial, and governmental customers through a competitive bid auction process. In previous years, AES Ohio Generation was also a primary subsidiary, but DPL has systematically exited this generation business. AES Ohio Generation retired its last remaining operating asset in their state-certified territories.May 2020 and sold it in June 2020.
DP&LKey Financial Drivers — Following the removal of the Decoupling Rider in December 2019, DPL's financial results are driven primarily by retail demand and weather. DPL's financial results are likely to be driven by other factors as well, including, but not limited to:
regulatory outcomes and impacts;
the passage of new legislation, implementation of regulations, or other changes in regulations; and
timely recovery of transmission and distribution expenditures.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — AES Ohio is regulated by the PUCO for its distribution services and facilities, retail rates and charges, reliability of service, compliance with renewable energy portfolio requirements, energy efficiency program requirements, and certain other matters. The PUCO maintains jurisdiction over the delivery of electricity, SSO, and other retail electric services.


18 | 2021 Annual Report

Electric customers within Ohio are permitted to purchase power under contract from a Competitive Retail Electric Service ("CRES") provider or from their local utility under SSO rates. The SSO generation supply is provided by third parties through a competitive bid process. Ohio utilities have the exclusive right to provide transmission and distribution services in their state-certified territories. While Ohio allows customers to choose retail generation providers, DP&LAES Ohio is required to provide retail generation service at SSO rates to any customer that has not signed a contract with a CRES provider.provider or as a provider of last resort in the event of a CRES provider default. SSO rates are subject to rules and regulations of the PUCO and are established through a competitive bid process for the supply of power to SSO customers. DP&L's
AES Ohio's distribution rates are regulated by the PUCO and are established through a traditional cost-based rate-setting process. DP&LAES Ohio is permitted to recover its costs of providing distribution service as well as earn a regulated rate of return on assets, determined by the regulator, based on the utility's allowed regulated asset base, capital structure, and cost of capital. DP&L'sAES Ohio's retail rates include various adjustment mechanisms including, but not limited to, the timely recovery of costs incurred related to comply with alternativepower purchased through the competitive bid process, participation in the PJM RTO, severe storm damage, and energy renewables, energy efficiency, and economic development costs. DP&L's wholesaleefficiency. AES Ohio's transmission rates are regulated by FERC.
DP&LAES Ohio is a member of PJM, an RTO that operates the transmission systems owned by utilities operating in all or parts of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, D.C., Virginia, Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, North


Carolina, Tennessee, Indiana and Illinois.a multi-state region, including Ohio. PJM also runsadministers the day-ahead and real-time energy markets, ancillary services market and forward capacity market for its members.
On November 30, 2020, AES Ohio filed a new Distribution Rate Case Application proposing a revenue increase of $121 million per year and incorporating DIR investments that were planned and approved in the last rate case but not yet included in distribution rates, other distribution investments since September 2015, investments necessitated by the tornados that occurred on Memorial Day in 2019, and other proposed increases. The rate case also includes a proposal for increased tree-trimming expenses and certain customer demand-side management programs and recovery of prior-approved regulatory assets for tree trimming, uncollectible expenses and rate case expense. A hearing on this case was held beginning in January 2022, and the case is pending a commission order.
In March 2020, AES Ohio filed an application for a formula-based rate for its transmission service, which was approved and made effective May 3, 2020. In December 2020, an uncontested settlement was reached regarding these rates and filed with the FERC. It was approved on April 15, 2021.
Business DescriptionSmart Grid and Comprehensive Settlement DP&L transmits, distributesOn October 23, 2020, AES Ohio entered into a Stipulation and sells electricityRecommendation (settlement) with the staff of the PUCO and various customers, and organizations representing customers of AES Ohio and certain other parties with respect to, retail customersamong other matters, AES Ohio's applications pending at the PUCO for (i) approval of AES Ohio's plan to modernize its distribution grid (the "Smart Grid Plan"), (ii) findings that AES Ohio passed the SEET for 2018 and 2019, and (iii) findings that AES Ohio's current ESP 1 satisfies the SEET and the more favorable in a 6,000 square mile areathe aggregate ("MFA") regulatory test. A hearing was held in January 2021 for consideration of West Central Ohio.this settlement and on June 16, 2021, the PUCO issued their opinion and order accepting the stipulation as filed. Several applications for rehearing of the PUCO's orders relating to the comprehensive settlement were filed and denied on December 1, 2021. The OCC appealed this final PUCO Order to the Ohio consumers haveSupreme Court on December 6, 2021; this appeal remains pending. With the rightPUCO’s issuance of their opinion and order, AES has made cash contributions of $150 million in 2021 to choose the electric generation supplier from whom they purchase retail generation service; however, retail transmissionimprove AES Ohio's infrastructure and distribution services are still regulated. DP&L has the exclusive right to provide such transmission and distribution services to those customers. Additionally, DP&L procures retail SSO electric service on behalf of residential, commercial, industrial and governmental customers.modernize its grid while maintaining liquidity.
In September 2018, DP&L received an orderSeparate from the PUCO establishing new base distribution rates for DP&L (“the order”), which became effective October 1, 2018. The order approved, without modification, a stipulation and recommendation previouslyESP process, on January 23, 2020, AES Ohio filed by DP&L, along with various intervening parties, with the PUCO staff. The order established a revenue requirement of $248 million for DP&L's electric service base distribution rates, which reflects an increaserequesting approval to distribution revenues of $30 million per year. In addition,defer its decoupling costs consistent with the order authorizes DP&L to collect from customers costs related to qualified investments through amethodology approved in its Distribution Investment Rider, changes the Decoupling Rider toRate Case. If approved, deferral would be effective December 18, 2019 and going forward would reduce variability from the impactimpacts of weather, energy efficiency programs, and demand, partially resolves regulatory issues related to the TCJA, and authorizes DP&L to defer certain vegetation management costs for future collection.
In January 2019, DP&L filed a request with the PUCO for a two-year extension of its Distribution Modernization Rider ("DMR") through October 2022, in the proposed amount of $199 million for each of the two additional years. The request was made pursuant to the PUCO’s October 2017 ESP order, which approved the DMR and the option for DP&L to file for a two-year extension. The extension request is set at a level expected to reduce debt obligations at both DP&L and DPL and to position DP&L to make capital expenditures to maintain and modernize its electric grid.
Environmental Regulation — For information on compliance with environmental regulations see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
Key Financial Drivers — DPL's financial results are primarily driven by customer growth. Following the issuance of the distribution rate order in September 2018 and the resulting changes to the decoupling rider, DPL's financial results are no longer driven by retail demand and weather, but will be impacted by customer growth within our service territory.
In addition, DPL's financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
the passage of new legislation, new regulations or othereconomic changes in regulation;
timely recovery of transmission and distribution expenditures; and
exiting generation assets currently owned by AES Ohio Generation.customer demand. An evidentiary hearing was held on this matter on May 4, 2021.
Construction and Development Strategy — Planned construction additionsprojects primarily relate to new investments in and upgrades to DPL'sAES Ohio's transmission and distribution system. Capital projects are subject to continuing review and are revised in light of changes in financial and economic conditions, load forecasts, legislative and regulatory developments, and changing environmental standards, among other factors.
DP&LDPL is projecting to spend an estimated $628$786 million on capital projects from 2022 through 2024, which includes expected spending under AES Ohio's Smart Grid Plan included in the Stipulation and Recommendation entered into on October 23, 2020 (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure above) as well as other new transmission and distribution projects. The Smart Grid Plan, as approved, provides for a return on and recovery of up to $249 million of Phase 1 investments and recovery of operational and maintenance expenses through AES


19 | 2021 Annual Report

Ohio's existing Infrastructure Investment Rider for a term of four years, under an aggregate cap of $268 million on the period 2019 through 2021. We expect to finance this construction withamount of such investments and expenses that is recoverable, and an acknowledgement that AES Ohio may file a combination of cash on hand, short-term financing, long-term debt and cash flows from operations.
In December 2018, DP&L filed a Distribution Modernization Plansubsequent application with the PUCO proposingwithin three years seeking approvals for Phase 2 of the Smart Grid Plan.
AES Clean Energy
Business Description — AES' U.S. renewables portfolio, referred to invest $576 millionas AES Clean Energy, is one of the top U.S. renewables growth platforms. It collectively comprises AES Renewable Holdings, sPower, AES Clean Energy Development, and other renewable assets, as part of its broader investments in capitalthe U.S.
On February 1, 2021, specifically identified projects in the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms were merged to form AES Clean Energy Development, which serves as the development vehicle for all future renewable projects in the U.S. sPower remains an AES unconsolidated affiliate after the merger.
In November 2021, AES Clean Energy Development acquired Valcour Intermediate Holdings, which owns a portfolio of six wind farms in New York with total generating capacity of 612 MW. The Valcour portfolio produces over 30% of the state's wind power, complementing AES Clean Energy's existing operating and development solar and energy storage assets in the state of New York. In December 2021, AES Clean Energy Development acquired Community Energy, a U.S. solar developer with a mission to commercialize utility-scale solar and decarbonize the grid. Community Energy brings a 10 GW pipeline of renewables projects and an industry-leading development team to AES Clean Energy.
AES Clean Energy aims to solve our customers' energy challenges. AES Clean Energy offers its customers an expanded portfolio of innovative solutions based on cutting-edge technologies that are designed to accelerate their energy futures. Generation capacity of the systems owned and/or operated under AES Clean Energy is 4,312 MW across the U.S. with another 1,093 MW under construction. This capacity includes 3,156 MW of solar, 1,861 MW of wind, and 388 MW of energy storage.
A majority of solar projects under AES Clean Energy have been financed with tax equity structures. Under these tax equity structures, the tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes, that vary over the next 20 years. The principal componentslife of the Distribution Modernization Plan includes leveraging technologies to modernize and improve the sustainabilityprojects. Based on certain liquidation provisions of the grid,tax equity structures, this could result in variability to earnings attributable to AES compared to the earnings reported at the facilities.
Key Financial Drivers — The financial results of AES Clean Energy are primarily driven by the efficient construction and enhancing customer experienceoperation of renewable energy facilities across the U.S. under long-term PPAs, through which the energy price on the entire production of these facilities is guaranteed. The financial results of renewable assets are primarily driven by the amount of wind or solar resource at the facilities, availability of facilities, and security. These initiatives will allow DP&Lgrowth in projects.
Laurel Mountain, Buffalo Gap I, Buffalo Gap II, and Buffalo Gap III are exposed to leveragethe volatility of energy prices and integrate distributedtheir revenue may change materially as energy resources into its grid, including community solar,prices fluctuate in their respective markets of operations. Laurel Mountain also operates 16 MW of battery energy storage microgridsthat is sold into the PJM market as regulation energy. For these projects, PJM and electric vehicle charging infrastructure.ERCOT power prices impact financial results.
Development Strategy — As states, communities, and organizations of all types make commitments and plan to reduce their carbon footprints, renewables are the fastest-growing source of electricity generation in the U.S. AES Clean Energy works with its customers to co-create and deliver the smarter, greener energy solutions that meet their needs, including 24/7 carbon-free energy. The merged renewables platform has brought together sPower's and AES' differentiated capabilities in solar, wind, and energy storage to accelerate customers' energy transitions.
AES Clean Energy's renewable project backlog includes 4,414 MW of projects for which long-term PPAs have been signed or, as applicable, tariffs have been assigned through a regulatory process. The budget for construction of the projects currently under construction and the contracted projects is over $4.1 billion. AES Clean Energy is actively developing new products and renewable sites to serve the current and future needs of its customers.
U.S. Conventional Generation
Business Description — In the U.S., we own a diversifiedconventional generation portfolio in terms of geography, technology and fuel source.portfolio. The principal markets and locations where we are engaged in the generation and supply of electricity (energy and capacity) are the Western Electric Coordinating Council,California Independent System Operator ("CAISO"), PJM, Southwest Power Pool Electric Energy NetworkHawaii, and Hawaii.Puerto Rico. AES Southland, operating in the Western Electric Coordinating Council,CAISO, is our most significant generatinggeneration business.



20 | 2021 Annual Report

Many of our non-renewable U.S. generation plants provide baseload operations and are required to maintain a guaranteed level of availability. Any change in availability has a direct impact on financial performance. TheSome plants are generally eligible for availability bonuses on an annual basis if they meet certain requirements. InCoal and natural gas are used as the primary fuels. Coal prices are set by market factors internationally, while natural gas prices are generally set domestically. Recently we have seen international impacts on domestic gas prices (Henry Hub) due to the large amount of U.S. natural gas that can be exported through the liquefaction plants that have come online in recent years. Price variations for these fuels can change the composition of generation costs and energy prices in our generation businesses.
These generation businesses have entered into long-term PPAs with utilities or other offtakers. Some businesses with PPAs have mechanisms to recover fuel costs from the offtaker, including an energy payment partially based on the market price of fuel. When market price fluctuations in fuel are borne by the offtaker, revenue may change as fuel prices fluctuate, but the variable margin or profitability should remain consistent. These businesses often have an opportunity to increase or decrease profitability from payments under their PPAs depending on such items as plant efficiency and availability, heat rate, ability to buy coal at lower costs through AES' global sourcing program, and fuel flexibility.
Warrior Run currently operates as a QF, as defined under the PURPA. This business entered into a long-term contract with an electric utility that had a mandatory obligation to purchase power from QFs at the utility's avoided cost (i.e. the likely costs for both energy and capital investment that would have been incurred by the purchasing utility if that utility had to provide its own generating capacity or purchase it from another source). To be a QF, a cogeneration facility must produce electricity and useful thermal energy for an industrial or commercial process or heating or cooling application in certain proportions to the facility's total energy output and meet certain efficiency standards. To be a QF, a small power production facility must generally use a renewable resource as its energy input and meet certain size criteria or be a cogeneration facility that simultaneously generates electricity and process heat or steam.
Our non-QF generation businesses in the U.S. currently operate as Exempt Wholesale Generators as defined under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, amending the Public Utility Holding Company Act (“PUHCA”). These businesses, subject to approval of FERC, have the right to sell power at market-based rates, either directly to the wholesale market or to a third-party offtaker such as a power marketer or utility/industrial customer. Under the Energy Policy Act and FERC's regulations, approval from FERC to sell wholesale power at market-based rates is generally dependent upon a showing to FERC that the seller lacks market power in generation and transmission, that the seller and its affiliates cannot erect other barriers to market entry, and that there is no opportunity for abusive transactions involving regulated affiliates of the seller.
The U.S. wholesale electricity market consists of multiple distinct regional markets that are subject to both federal regulation, as implemented by FERC, and regional regulation as defined by rules designed and implemented by the RTOs, non-profit corporations that operate the regional transmission grid and maintain organized markets for electricity. These rules, for the most part, govern such items as the determination of the market mechanism for setting the system marginal price for energy and the establishment of guidelines and incentives for the addition to plant availability, fuel cost is a key business driverof new capacity. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors for some of our facilities.
Environmental Regulation — For aadditional discussion of environmentalon U.S. regulatory matters affecting U.S. Generation, see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.matters.
AES Southland
Business Description In terms of aggregate installed capacity, AES Southland is one of the largest generation operators in California by aggregate installed capacity, with an installed gross capacity of 3,9413,803 MW accounting for approximately 5%at the end of the state's installed capacity and 17% of the peak demand in Southern California Edison's territory.2021. The threefive coastal power plants comprising AES Southland are in areas that are critical for local reliability and play an important role in integrating the increasing amounts of renewable generation resources in California. AES Southland is composed of three once-through cooling ("OTC") power plants, two combined cycle gas-fired generation facilities and an interconnected battery-based energy storage facility.
All of AES Southland's capacity was previously contracted through a 20 year agreement (the “Tolling Agreement”), that expired on May 31, 2018. Currently, AES Huntington Beach, LLC, and AES Alamitos, LLC, and AES Redondo Beach ("Southland OTC units") are contracted thoughthrough Resource Adequacy Purchase Agreements (the “RAPAs”(“RAPAs”),. Under the RAPAs, as approved by the California Public Utilities Commission, in 2017. AES Redondo Beach, LLC has also entered into various RAPAs for the period of June 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020.
Under the RAPAs, thethese generating stations provide resource adequacy capacity, and have no obligation to produce or sell any energy to the RAPA counterparty. However, the generating stations are required to bid energy into the California ISO markets. Southland OTC units entered into commodity swap contracts to economically hedge price variability inherent in electricity sales arrangements. Compensation under these RAPAs is dependent on the availability of the AES Southland units in the California ISO market. Failure to achieve the minimum availability target willwould result in an assessed penalty.
Re-powering

21 | 2021 Annual Report

In November 2014, AES Southland was awarded 20-year contracts by SCESouthern California Edison ("SCE") to provide 1,284 MW of combined cycle gas-fired generation and 100 MW of interconnected battery-based energy storage.storage ("Southland Energy units"). The agreements for the combined cycle gas-fired generation were amended in 2019 increasing contracted capacity to 1,299 MW and additional amendments during 2021 further increased contracted capacity to 1,348 MW. The contracts are resource adequacy agreementsRAPAs with annual energy put options. If AES Southland exercises the annual put option, is exercised, all capacity, energy and ancillary services will be sold to SCE in exchange for a fixed monthly capacity fee that covers fixed operating cost, debt service, and return on capital. In addition, SCE will reimburse variable costs and provide the natural gasgas. Southland Energy may exercise the annual put option for any contract year by delivering notice of such exercise to SCE at least one year before the start of such contract year, and charging electricity. Ifno more than two years before the start of any contract year. Southland Energy units are required to bid energy into the California ISO market if the annual put option is not exercised, SCE only has rights to the resource adequacy capacity for that contract year and AES Southland can sell the energy and ancillary services to other counterparties.exercised.
In April 2017, the California Energy Commission unanimously approved the licenses for the newSouthland Energy combined cycle projects at AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach. In June 2017, AES closed the financing of $2.0$2 billion, funded with a combination of non-recourse debt and AES equity. Construction of the combined cycle capacity began in 2017. At the end of 2019, five of the twelve Southland OTC generation units were retired to support the construction efforts of the Southland Energy combined cycle gas-fired generation projects in anticipation of COD, which was reached in early February 2020. The construction of this new capacity startedthe Alamitos Energy Center, an interconnected battery-based energy storage facility, began in 2017June 2019 and commercial operation was achieved on January 1, 2021.
On January 23, 2020, the Statewide Advisory Committee on Cooling Water Intake Structures adopted a recommendation to present to the SWRCB to extend OTC compliance dates for the remaining Southland OTC units at AES Huntington Beach and AES Alamitos until December 31, 2023 and AES Redondo Beach until December 31, 2021. On September 1, 2020, in response to a request by the state's energy, utility, and grid operators and regulators, the SWRCB approved amendments to its OTC. The SWRCB public hearing regarding the final decision on the amendment of the gas-fired capacity is expected to commence in 2020OTC policy was held on October 19, 2021 and the energy storage capacityBoard voted in favor of extending the compliance date for AES Redondo Beach to December 31, 2023. The AES Redondo Beach NPDES permit has been administratively extended. The SWRCB OTC Policy previously required the shutdown and permanent retirement of all remaining Southland OTC generating units by December 31, 2020. There is expectedcurrently no plan to commence in 2021.replace the OTC generating units at the AES Redondo Beach generating station following the retirement. See United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and RegulationsCooling Water Intake for further discussion of AES Southland’s plans regarding the OTC Policy.
Key Financial Drivers — AES Southland's availability is one of the most important drivers of operations, along with market demand and prices for gas and electricity.
Additional U.S. Generation Facilities
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — For the non-renewable businesses, coal and natural gas are used as the primary fuels. Coal prices are set by market factors internationally, while natural gas prices are generally set domestically. Price variations for these fuels can change the composition of generation costs and energy prices in our generation businesses.
Many of these generation businesses have entered into long-term PPAs with utilities or other offtakers. Some businesses with PPAs have mechanisms to recover fuel costs from the offtaker, including an energy payment partially based on the market price of fuel. When market price fluctuations in fuel are borne by the offtaker, revenue may change as fuel prices fluctuate, but the variable margin or profitability should remain consistent. These businesses often have an opportunity to increase or decrease profitability from payments under their PPAs depending on such items as plant efficiency and availability, heat rate, ability to buy coal at lower costs through AES' global sourcing program and fuel flexibility.
Several of our generation businesses in the U.S. currently operate as QFs, includingAES Hawaii Shady Point and Warrior Run, as defined under the PURPA. These businesses entered into long-term contracts with electric utilities that had a mandatory obligation to purchase power from QFs at the utility's avoided cost (i.e., the likely costs for both energy and capital investment that would have been incurred by the purchasing utility if that utility had to provide its own generating capacity or purchase it from another source). To be a QF, a cogeneration facility must


produce electricity and useful thermal energy for an industrial or commercial process or heating or cooling applications in certain proportions to the facility's total energy output and meet certain efficiency standards. To be a QF, a small power production facility must generally use a renewable resource as its energy input and meet certain size criteria.
Our non-QF generation businesses in the U.S. currently operate as Exempt Wholesale Generators as defined under the EPAct 1992. These businesses, subject to approval of FERC, have the right to sell power at market-based rates, either directly to the wholesale market or to a third-party offtaker such as a power marketer or utility/industrial customer. Under the Federal Power Act and FERC's regulations, approval from FERC to sell wholesale power at market-based rates is generally dependent upon a showing to FERC that the seller lacks market power in generation and transmission, that the seller and its affiliates cannot erect other barriers to market entry and that there is no opportunity for abusive transactions involving regulated affiliates of the seller.
The U.S. wholesale electricity market consists of multiple distinct regional markets that are subject to both federal regulation, as implemented by FERC, and regional regulation as defined by rules designed and implemented by the RTOs, non-profit corporations that operate the regional transmission grid and maintain organized markets for electricity. These rules, for the most part, govern such items as the determination of the market mechanism for setting the system marginal price for energy and the establishment of guidelines and incentives for the addition of new capacity. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors for additional discussion on U.S. regulatory matters.
Business Description Additional businesses include thermal, wind, and solar generating facilities, of which our U.S. Renewables businesses and AES Hawaii are the most significant.
U.S. Renewables
sPower owns and/or operates 153 utility and distributed electrical generation systems with a capacity of 1,221 MWh currently in operation across the U.S. sPower is also actively buying, developing and constructing renewable assets in the U.S.
AES Distributed Energy develops, constructs and sells electricity generated by photovoltaic solar energy systems and energy storage systems to public sector, utility, and non-profit entities through PPAs.
Excluding sPower wind plants, AES has 732 MW of wind capacity in the U.S., located in California, Texas and West Virginia. Mountain View I & II, Mountain View IV and Buffalo Gap I sell under long-term PPAs through which the energy price on the entire production of these facilities is guaranteed. Laurel Mountain, Buffalo Gap II and Buffalo Gap III are exposed to the volatility of energy prices and their revenue may change materially as energy prices fluctuate in their respective markets of operations.
AES manages the U.S. Renewables portfolio as part of its broader investments in the U.S.. A portion of U.S. Solar projects and the majority of wind projects have been financed with tax equity structures. Under these tax equity structures, the tax equity investors receive a portion of the economic attributes of the facilities, including tax attributes that vary over the life of the projects. Based on certain liquidation provisions of the tax equity structures, this could result in variability to earnings attributable to AES compared to the earnings reported at the facilities.
AES Hawaii
AES Hawaii receives a fuelan energy payment from its offtaker under a PPA expiring in 2022, which is based on a fixed rate indexed to the Gross National Product Implicit Price Deflator. Since the fuelenergy payment is not directly linked to market prices for fuel, the risk arising from fluctuations in market prices for coal is borne by AES Hawaii. AES Hawaii has entered into fixed-price coal purchase commitments through December 2019 and plans to seek additional fuel purchase commitments to manage fuel price risk during 2022.
In July 2020, the Hawaii State Legislature passed Senate Bill 2629 which will prohibit AES Hawaii from generating electricity from coal after December 2019.31, 2022. This will restrict the Company from contracting the asset beyond the expiration of its existing PPA, and as a result, AES plans to retire the AES Hawaii facility in 2022.
Key Financial Drivers U.S. thermal generation'sAES Hawaii's financial results are driven by fuel costs and outages. The Company has entered into long-term fuel contracts to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuating prices. In addition, major maintenance requiring units to be off-line is performed during periods when power demand is typically lower. The financial results of U.S. Wind are primarily driven by increased production due to faster and less turbulent wind and reduced turbine outages. In addition, PJM and ERCOT power prices impact financial results for the wind projects that are operating without long-term contracts for all or some of their capacity. The financial results of U.S. Solar are primarily driven by the amount of sunshine hours available at the facilities, cell maintenance and growth in projects. For additional details see Key Trends and Uncertainties in Item 7.— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Construction and Development — Planned capital projects include the AES Southland re-powering described above. In addition to the new construction project, U.S. Generation performs capital projects related to major plant


maintenance, repairs and upgrades to be compliant with new environmental laws and regulations. sPower has 360 MW of projects under construction and a development pipeline that includes 938 MW of projects for which long-term PPAs have been signed. The budget for construction of the projects currently under construction and the contracted projects is over $1.8 billion. AES Distributed Energy has 78 MW of projects under construction and a development pipeline that includes 332 MW of projects for which long-term PPAs have been signed or, as applicable, tariffs have been assigned through a regulatory process. The budget for construction of the projects currently under construction and the contracted projects is over $1 billion.
Puerto Rico
Business Description — AES Puerto Rico owns and operates a coal-fired cogeneration plant and a solar plant of 524 MW and 24 MW, respectively, representing approximately 8% of the installed capacity in Puerto Rico. Both plants are fully contracted through long-term PPAs with PREPA expiring in 2027 and 2037, respectively. AES Puerto Rico receives a capacity payment based on the plants' twelve month rolling average availability, receiving the full payment when the availability is 90% or higher. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political—Puerto Rico for further discussion of the long-term PPAs with PREPA.


22 | 2021 Annual Report

Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to, improved operational performance and plant availability.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure— Puerto Rico has a single electric grid managed by PREPA, a state-owned entity that suppliesprovides virtually all of the electric power consumed in Puerto Rico and generates, transmits, and distributes electricity to 1.5 million customers. Since June 2021 PREPA contracted LUMA Energy to manage the transmission, distribution and commercialization activities. The Puerto Rico Energy Bureau is the main regulatory body. The bureau approves wholesale and retail rates, sets efficiency and interconnection standards, and oversees PREPA's compliance with Puerto Rico's renewable portfolio standard.
Puerto Rico's electricity is 98% produced by thermal plants (47% from petroleum, 34%(43% from natural gas, 38% from petroleum, and 17% from coal), while the remaining 2% is supplied by renewable resources (wind, solar, and hydro).
Development Strategy — Puerto Rico has clear goals of supplying its system from renewable resources, with targets of 40% from renewables by 2025 and 100% from renewables by 2050. To achieve the established targets, PREPA intends to issue six requests for proposal for generation from renewable sources in the coming years. The first request for proposal was issued in February 2021. AES Puerto Rico, through AES Clean Flexible Energy, is working to deliver green energy solutions to meet the country's needs, with a long-term strategy to achieve 24/7 carbon-free energy. AES Clean Flexible Energy expects to have a portfolio of solar and storage projects participating. As applicable, tariffs will be assigned through a regulatory process. AES Clean Flexible Energy is actively developing new renewable sites to serve the future needs of Puerto Rico and its communities.
U.S. Environmental Regulation
For information on compliance with environmental regulations see Item 1.United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations.
El Salvador
Business Description — AES Puerto RicoEl Salvador is the majority owner of four of the five distribution companies operating in El Salvador (CAESS, CLESA, EEO and DEUSEM). AES El Salvador's territory covers 77% of the country and accounted for 4,076 GWh of the wholesale market energy sales during 2021. AES El Salvador owns and operates two solar farms, Opico Power and Moncagua with 4 MW and 3 MW capacity, respectively; AES Nejapa, a coal-fired cogeneration plant and a solarbiomass power plant of 5246 MW capacity; and 50% of Bosforo and Cuscatlan Solar, solar farms of 100 MW and 2410 MW respectively, representing approximately 9%capacity, respectively. The energy produced by these solar farms is fully contracted by AES' utilities in El Salvador.
In addition, AES El Salvador offers customers non-regulated services such as energy trading, electromechanical construction, O&M of the installed capacity in Puerto Rico. Both plants have long-term PPAs expiring in 2027electrical assets, EPC, pole rental, and 2032, respectively, with PREPA. See Item 7.—tax collection for municipalities.
Management's Discussion and Analysis ofKey Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political—Puerto RicoDrivers for further discussion of the long-term PPA with PREPA.— Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
El Salvadorimproved operational performance;
variability in energy demand driven by weather; and
the impact of fuel oil prices on energy tariff prices, which affect cash flow due to a three-month delay in the pass-through of energy costs to the tariffs charged to customers.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — El Salvador's national electric market is composed of generation, distribution, transmission, and marketing businesses, as well as a market and system operator, and regulatory agencies. The operation of the transmission system and the wholesale market is based on production costs with a marginal economic model that rewards efficiency and allows investors to have guaranteed profits, while end users receive affordable rates. The energy sector is governed by the General Electricity Law, which establishes two regulatory entities responsible for monitoring its compliance:
The National Energy Council is the highest authority on energy policy and strategy, and the coordinating body for the different energy sectors. One of its main objectives is to promote investment in non-conventional renewable sources to diversify the energy matrix.
The General Superintendence of Electricity and Telecommunications regulates the market and sets consumer prices, and, jointly with the distribution companies in El Salvador, developed the tariff calculation applicable from 2018 until 2022. The next tariff calculation is scheduled for 2022, and will be effective starting in 2023.


23 | 2021 Annual Report

El Salvador has a national electric grid that interconnects directly with Guatemala and Honduras.Honduras, allowing transactions with all Central American countries. The sector has approximately 1,6591,865 MW of installed capacity, composed primarily of thermal (43%(47%), hydroelectric (34%(30%), geothermal (10%solar (11%), biomass (9%), and solar (4%wind (3%) generation plants.
Business DescriptionDevelopment Strategy In order to explore new business opportunities, AES El Salvador created AES Soluciones, an LED public lighting service provider and the main commercial and industrial solar photovoltaic EPC provider in the country. AES Next is also the majority owner ofO&M services provider for the Bosforo project.Furthermore, the four of the five distribution companies operating inoperated by AES El Salvador (CAESS, CLESA, EEOstarted a modernization and DEUSEM). AES El Salvador's territory covers 79% of the country and accounted for 4,040 GWh of the wholesale market energy purchases during 2018, or about 63% market share.
Construction and Development — Asdigitization initiative as part of the initiative to pursue opportunities in renewable generation, AES El Salvador has entered into a joint venture with Corporacion Multi-Inversiones, a Guatemalan investment group, to develop, constructdevelopment, sustainability, and operate Bosforo, a 142 MW solar farm. 43 MWgrowth strategy of the project were completed in 2018 and are fully operational. 57 MW are under construction and expected to become operational during the first half of 2019 and the remaining 42 MW will start construction in 2019 and are expected to be completed in the second half of 2019. The energy produced by this project will be contracted directly by AES' utilities in El Salvador.business.




24 | 2021 Annual Report

aes-20211231_g7.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.


25 | 2021 Annual Report

South America SBU
Our South America SBU has generation facilities in four countries — Chile, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil. AES Gener, whichAndes is a publicly traded company in Chile and owns all of our assets in Chile, AES Chivor in Colombia, and TermoAndes in Argentina, as detailed below, is a publicly traded company in Chile.below. AES has a 66.7%67% ownership interest in AES GenerAndes and this business is consolidated in our financial statements. TietêAES Brasil is a publicly traded company in Brazil. AES controls and consolidates TietêAES Brasil through its 24%47% economic interest.
Operating installed capacity of our South America SBU totals 12,43512,446 MW, of which 33%34%, 28%27%, 8%9%, and 31%30% are located in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Brazil, respectively. The following table lists our South America SBU generation facilities:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
Chivor Colombia Hydro 1,000
 67% 2000 2019-2026 VariousChivorColombiaHydro1,000 67 %20002022-2040Various
San FernandoSan FernandoColombiaSolar61 67 %20212036Ecopetrol
CastillaCastillaColombiaSolar21 67 %20192034Ecopetrol
Tunjita Colombia Hydro 20
 67% 2016 TunjitaColombiaHydro20 67 %2016
Colombia Subtotal 1,020
   Colombia Subtotal1,102 
Gener - Chile (1)
 Chile Coal/Hydro/Diesel/Solar/Biomass 1,532
 67% 2000 2019-2040 Various
Gener - Chile (1)
ChileCoal/Hydro/Diesel/Solar/Biomass1,438 67 %20002022-2042Various
Guacolda (2)
 Chile Coal 760
 33% 2000 2019-2032 Various
Electrica Angamos Chile Coal 558
 67% 2011 2026-2037 Minera Escondida, Minera Spence, Quebrada BlancaElectrica AngamosChileCoal558 67 %20112021Quebrada Blanca
Cochrane Chile Coal 550
 40% 2016 2030-2037 SQM, Sierra Gorda, Quebrada BlancaCochraneChileCoal550 40 %20162030-2037SQM, Sierra Gorda, Quebrada Blanca
Alto Maipo (2)
Alto Maipo (2)
ChileHydro531 62 %20212040Minera Los Pelambres
Los OlmosLos OlmosChileWind110 67 %20222032Google, Various
Los CururosLos CururosChileWind109 34 %
Andes Solar 2aAndes Solar 2aChileSolar81 67 %
Cochrane ES Chile Energy Storage 20
 40% 2016 Cochrane ESChileEnergy Storage20 40 %2016
Electrica Angamos ES Chile Energy Storage 20
 67% 2011 
 
Electrica Angamos ESChileEnergy Storage20 67 %2011
Norgener ES (Los Andes) Chile Energy Storage 12
 67% 2009 
 
Norgener ES (Los Andes)ChileEnergy Storage12 67 %2009
Alfalfal Virtual ReservoirAlfalfal Virtual ReservoirChileEnergy Storage10 67 %2020
Chile Subtotal 3,452
   Chile Subtotal3,439 
TermoAndes (3)
 Argentina Gas/Diesel 643
 67% 2000 2019-2020 Various
TermoAndes (3)
ArgentinaGas/Diesel643 67 %20002022-2023Various
AES Gener Subtotal 5,115
   
AES Andes Subtotal (4)
AES Andes Subtotal (4)
5,184 
Alicura Argentina Hydro 1,050
 100% 2000 
 VariousAlicuraArgentinaHydro1,050 100 %2000
Paraná-GT Argentina Gas/Diesel 870
 100% 2001 
 
Paraná-GTArgentinaGas/Diesel870 100 %2001
San Nicolás Argentina Coal/Gas/Oil 675
 100% 1993 
 
San NicolásArgentinaCoal/Gas/Oil/Energy Storage691 100 %1993
Guillermo Brown (4)
 Argentina Gas/Diesel 576
 % 2016 
Los Caracoles (4)
 Argentina Hydro 125
 % 2009 2019 Energia Provincial Sociedad del Estado (EPSE)
Guillermo Brown (5)
Guillermo Brown (5)
ArgentinaGas/Diesel576 — %2016
Cabra Corral Argentina Hydro 102
 100% 1995 
 VariousCabra CorralArgentinaHydro102 100 %1995Various
Vientos BonaerensesVientos BonaerensesArgentinaWind100 100 %20202024-2040Various
Vientos NeuquinosVientos NeuquinosArgentinaWind100 100 %20202024-2040Various
Ullum Argentina Hydro 45
 100% 1996 
 VariousUllumArgentinaHydro45 100 %1996Various
Sarmiento Argentina Gas/Diesel 33
 100% 1996 
 
SarmientoArgentinaGas/Diesel33 100 %1996
El Tunal Argentina Hydro 10
 100% 1995 
 VariousEl TunalArgentinaHydro10 100 %1995Various
Argentina Subtotal 3,486
   Argentina Subtotal3,577 
Tietê (5)
 Brazil Hydro 2,658
 24% 1999 2029 Various
Tietê (6)
Tietê (6)
BrazilHydro2,658 47 %19992032Various
Alto Sertão II Brazil Wind 386
 24% 2017 2033-2035 VariousAlto Sertão IIBrazilWind386 37 %20172033-2035Various, CCEE
Guaimbe Brazil Solar 150
 24% 2018 2037 CCEE
Tietê Subtotal 3,194
   
Uruguaiana Brazil Gas 640
 46% 2000 
Brazil Subtotal 3,834
   
VentusVentusBrazilWind187 47 %20202034CCEE
Mandacaru and SalinasMandacaru and SalinasBrazilWind159 47 %20212033-2034CCEE
GuaimbêGuaimbêBrazilSolar150 37 %20182037CCEE
AGV SolarAGV SolarBrazilSolar76 47 %20192039Various
Boa HoraBoa HoraBrazilSolar69 47 %20192035CCEE
AES Brasil SubtotalAES Brasil Subtotal3,685 
 12,435
   12,446 
_____________________________
(1)AES Andes - Chile plants: Alfalfal, Andes Solar, Laja, Maitenes, Norgener 1, Norgener 2, PMGD PFV Kaufmann, Queltehues, Ventanas 1, Ventanas 2, Ventanas 3, Ventanas 4, and Volcán. In December 2020, AES Andes requested the retirement of Ventanas 1 and 2. Ventanas 1 initiated strategic reserve mode and Ventanas 2 is waiting for approval.


(1)
Gener - Chile plants: Alfalfal, Andes Solar, Laguna Verde, Laguna Verde Turbogas, Laja, Maitenes, Norgener 1, Norgener 2, Queltehues, Ventanas 1, Ventanas 2, Ventanas 3, Ventanas 4 and Volcán.26 | 2021 Annual Report
(2)
Guacolda is comprised of five coal-fired units under Guacolda Energia S.A., an unconsolidated entity for which the results of operations are reflected in Net equity in earnings of affiliates. The Company's ownership in Guacolda is held through AES Gener, a 67%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Gener owns 50% of Guacolda, resulting in an AES effective ownership in Guacolda of 33%.
(3)
TermoAndes is located in Argentina, but is connected to both the SEN in Chile and the SADI in Argentina.
(4)
AES operates these facilities through management or O&M agreements and owns no equity interest in these businesses.
(5)
Tietê plants: Água Vermelha, Bariri, Barra Bonita, Caconde, Euclides da Cunha, Ibitinga, Limoeiro, Mog-Guaçu, Nova Avanhandava, Promissão, Sao Joaquim and Sao Jose.


(2)Began generating in December 2021, full operations expected in the first half of 2022. In November 2021, Alto Maipo SpA filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. After Chapter 11 filing, the Company no longer has control over Alto Maipo and therefore deconsolidated the business.
(3)TermoAndes is located in Argentina, but is connected to both the SEN in Chile and the SADI in Argentina.
(4)In 2022, AES' indirect beneficial interest in AES Andes increased from 67% to 99% as result of a tender offer process.
(5)AES operates this facility through management or O&M agreements and to date owns no equity interest in the business.
(6)Tietê hydro plants: Água Vermelha, Bariri, Barra Bonita, Caconde, Euclides da Cunha, Ibitinga, Limoeiro, Mogi-Guaçu, Nova Avanhandava, Promissão, Sao Joaquim, and Sao Jose.

Under construction — The following table lists our plants under construction in the South America SBU: 
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestExpected Date of Commercial Operations
Tucano Phase 2BrazilWind167 47 %2H 2022
Tucano Phase 1BrazilWind155 23 %2H 2022
CajuínaBrazilWind478 47 %1H 2023
AES Brasil Subtotal800 
MesamávidaChileWind68 67 %1H 2022
Andes Solar 2bChileSolar180 67 %1H 2022
Energy Storage112 
Campo LindoChileWind73 67 %1H 2023
Virtual Reservoir 2ChileEnergy Storage40 67 %2H 2023
Andes Solar 4ChileSolar237 67 %2H 2023
Energy Storage148 
AES Andes Subtotal (1)
858 
BrisasColombiaSolar26 67 %2H 2022
Colombia Subtotal26 
1,684 
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Expected Date of Commercial Operations
Boa Hora Brazil Solar 69
 24% 1H 2019
AGV Solar Brazil Solar 75
 24% 1H 2019
Energetica Argentina Wind 100
 100% 1H 2020
Vientos Nequinos Argentina Wind 80
 100% 1H 2020
Alto Maipo Chile Hydro 531
 62% 2H 2020
      855
    
_____________________________
(1) In June 2018, the Company completed the sale of its entire 17% ownership2022, AES' indirect beneficial interest in Eletropaulo,AES Andes increased from 67% to 99% as result of a distribution business in Brazil. Priortender offer process.
The majority of projects under construction have executed mid- to its sale, Eletropaulo was accounted for as an equity method investment and its results of operations and financial position were reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.long-term PPAs.


27 | 2021 Annual Report

The following map illustrates the location of our South America facilities:
South America Businesses
southamericamap.jpgaes-20211231_g8.jpg
Chile
Business Description — In Chile, through AES Andes, we are engaged in the generation and supply of electricity (energy and capacity) in the SEN—see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below. AES Andes is the third largest generation operator in Chile in terms of installed capacity with 3,377 MW, excluding energy storage, and has a market share of approximately 12% as of December 31, 2021.
AES Andes owns a diversified generation portfolio in Chile in terms of geography, technology, customers, and energy resources. AES Andes' generation plants are located near the principal electricity consumption centers, including Santiago, Valparaiso, and Antofagasta. AES Andes' diverse generation portfolio provides flexibility for the management of contractual obligations with regulated and unregulated customers, provides backup energy to the spot market and facilitates operations under a variety of market and hydrological conditions.
AES Andes' Green Blend strategy aims to reduce carbon intensity and incorporate renewable energy to extend our existing conventional PPAs. This strategy de-links company's PPAs from legacy fossil resources, grows its renewable energy portfolio, and delivers a competitive, reliable energy solution. In line with the Green Blend strategy, AES Andes has committed to not build additional coal-based power plants and to advance the development of new renewable projects, including the implementation of battery energy storage systems ("BESS") and other technological innovations that will provide greater flexibility and reliability to the system.


28 | 2021 Annual Report

AES Andes currently has long-term contracts, with an average remaining term of approximately 9 years, with regulated distribution companies and unregulated customers, such as mining and industrial companies. In general, these long-term contracts include pass-through mechanisms for fuel costs along with price indexations to U.S. Consumer Price Index ("CPI").
In addition to energy payments, AES Andes also receives capacity payments to compensate for availability during periods of peak demand. The grid operator, Coordinador Electrico Nacional ("CEN"), annually determines the capacity requirements for each power plant. The capacity price is fixed semiannually by the National Energy Commission and indexed to the CPI and other relevant indices.
In January 2022, Inversiones Cachagua SpA, a wholly-owned AES subsidiary in Chile, completed a tender offer for the shares of AES Andes held by minority shareholders. Upon completion, AES' indirect beneficial interest in AES Andes increased from 67% to 99%. As of December 31, 2021, AES owned 67% of AES Andes.
Key Financial Drivers Hedging strategies at AES Andes limit volatility to the underlying financial drivers. In addition, financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
dry hydrology scenarios;
forced outages;
changes in current regulatory rulings altering the ability to pass through or recover certain costs;
fluctuations of the Chilean peso;
tax policy changes;
legislation promoting renewable energy and/or more restrictive regulations on thermal generation assets; and
market price risk when re-contracting.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Chilean electricity industry is divided into three business segments: generation, transmission, and distribution. Private companies operate in all three segments, and generators can enter into PPAs to sell energy to regulated and unregulated customers, as well as to other generators in the spot market.
Chile has operatedoperates in a single power market, referred to as the SEN, which has beenis managed by the grid operator CEN since November 2017. Previously, Chile had two main power systems, the SIC and SING, largely as a result of its geographic shape and size, which were merged to form the SEN.CEN. The SEN has an installed capacity


of approximately 24,586 MW. SEN27,819 MW, and represents 99% of the installed generation capacity of the country.
CEN coordinates all generation and transmission companies in the SEN. CEN minimizes the operating costs of the electricity system, while maximizing service quality and reliability requirements. CEN dispatches plants in merit order based on their variable cost of production, allowing for electricity to be supplied at the lowest available cost. In the south-central region of the SEN, (former SIC), thermoelectric generation is required to fulfill demand not satisfied by hydroelectric, solar, and wind output and is critical to provide reliable and dependable electricity supply under dry hydrological conditions.conditions in the highest demand area of the SEN. In the northern region of the SEN, (former SING), which includes the Atacama Desert, thermoelectric capacity represents the majority of installed capacity as hydroelectric generation is not feasible.capacity. The fuels used for thermoelectric generation, mainly coal, diesel, and LNG, are indexed to international prices. In 2018,2021, the installed generation installed capacity in the Chilean market was composed of the following:
Installed CapacitySEN
Thermoelectric54%
Hydroelectric27%
Solar10%
Wind7%
Other2%
47% thermoelectric, 25% hydroelectric, 16% solar, 10% wind, and 2% other fuel sources.
Hydroelectric plants represent a significant portion of the system's installed capacity. HydrologicalPrecipitation and snow melt impact hydrological conditions influence reservoir water levels, which in turn affectsChile. Rain occurs principally from June to August and snow melt occurs from September to December. These factors affect dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants, thereby influencing spot market prices. Precipitation and snow melt impact hydrological conditions in Chile. Rains occurs principally between June and August and are scarce during the remainder of the year. Snow melt occurs between September and November.
The Ministry of Energy has primary responsibility for the Chilean electricity system directly or through the National Energy Commission and the Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels.
In July 2016, modifications to the Transmission Law were enacted. This law establishes that the transmission system will be completely paid for by the end-users, gradually allocating the costs on the demand side from 2019 through 2034.
All generators can sell energy through contracts with regulated distribution companies or directly to unregulated customers. Unregulated customers are customers whose connected capacity is higher than 5 MW. Customers with connected capacity between 0.5 MW and 5.0 MW can opt for regulated or unregulated contracts for a minimum period of four years. By law, both regulated and unregulated customers are required to purchase all electricity under contracts. Generators may also sell energy to other power generation companies on a short-term


29 | 2021 Annual Report

basis at negotiated prices outside the spot market. Electricity prices in Chile are denominated in U.S. dollars,USD, although payments are made in Chilean pesos.
Business Description — In Chile, through AES Gener, we are engaged inThe Chilean government’s decarbonization plan includes the generation and supply of electricity (energy and capacity) in the SEN. AES Gener is the second largest generation operator in Chile in terms of installed capacity with 3,400 MW, excluding energy storage , and has a market share of approximately 14% as of December 31, 2018.
AES Gener owns a diversified generation portfolio in Chile in terms of geography, technology, customers and fuel source. AES Gener's plants are located near the principal electricity consumption centers, including Santiago, Valparaiso and Antofagasta. AES Gener's diverse generation portfolio provides flexibility for the management of contractual obligations with regulated and unregulated customers, provides backup energy to the spot market and facilitates operations under a variety of market and hydrological conditions.
Our commercial strategy in Chile aims to maximize margin while reducing cash flow volatility. To achieve this, we contract a significant portion of our coal and hydroelectric baseload capacity under long-term agreements with a diversified customer base. Power plants not considered within our baseload capacity (higher variable cost units, mainly diesel) sell energy on the spot market when operating during scarce system supply conditions, such as low hydrology and/or plant outages. In Chile, sales on the spot market are made only to other generation companies who are memberscomplete retirement of the SEN at the system marginal cost.
AES Gener currently has long-term contracts, with an average remaining term of approximately 11 years, with regulated distribution companies and unregulated customers, such as mining and industrial companies. In general, these long-term contracts include pass-through mechanisms for fuel costs along with price indexations to US CPI.
In addition to energy payments, AES Gener also receives capacity payments to compensate for availability during periods of peak demand. CEN annually determines the capacity requirements for each power plant. The


capacity price is fixed semiannuallycoal fleet by the National Energy Commissionend of 2040 and indexed to the CPI and other relevant indices.
Environmental Regulation — During 2017 and 2016,carbon neutrality by 2050. On December 26, 2020, the Ministry of EnvironmentEnergy’s Supreme Decree Number 42 went into effect, allowing coal plants to enter into Strategic Reserve Status (“SRS”) and receive 60% of capacity payments for the 5-year period following its shutdown to remain connected as a backup in case of a system emergency. Following the issuance of this regulation and per the disconnection and termination agreement signed with the Chilean government in June 2019, AES Andes accelerated the retirement plans of its Ventanas 1 and Ventanas 2 coal-fired units. Ventanas 1 was shut down on December 29, 2020 and entered into SRS. Concurrently, AES Andes requested the shutdown of Ventanas 2 as soon as possible. Ventanas 2’s shut down and transition into SRS is pending resolution of current system transmission constraints in order to guarantee system stability and ensure a responsible energy transition. The CEN has indicated that the unit’s retirement into SRS would be postponed until at least September 1, 2022.
In July 2021, AES Andes committed to allow the shutdown of coal-fired operations at its Ventanas 3, Ventanas 4, Angamos 1, and Angamos 2 units as soon as January 1, 2025, once the safety, sufficiency, and competitiveness of the system allows it. These four units together have an installed capacity of 1,095 MW. In July 2021, the Company completed the sale of its entire ownership interest in Guacolda, a 764 MW coal-fired plant located in Chile. Guacolda, Ventanas, and Angamos represent an aggregate of 2.2 GW of coal-fired capacity, or 72% of AES Andes’ legacy coal fleet. Each unit has publicly announced phase-out plans in line with the Company’s decarbonization strategy. AES Andes continues to work under the previous administration updatedGreen Blend strategy to accelerate the Atmospheric Decontamination Plan forphase-out of the Ventanas and Huasco regions. Under that proposed plan, no significant investments were needed to comply with new requirements at our plants Ventanas and Guacolda. However, the authority under the current administration rejected that proposed plan on December 30, 2017.remaining two coal-fired plants.
Environmental Regulation In December 2018,March 2019, a new decontamination plan for the Ventanas and Huasco regionsregion was proposedapproved. AES Andes has implemented the requirements as defined by the authority underplan and is awaiting the current administration. Currently, the Environmental Ministry expects approval of the new decontamination plan in early March 2019 and we are currently assessing the impact of the new proposed decontamination plan.environmental authority.
Chilean law requires all electricity generators to supply a certain portion of their total contractual obligations with NCREs.non-conventional renewable energy ("NCRE"). Generation companies are able to meet this requirement by building NCRE generation capacity (wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, and small hydroelectric technology) or purchasing NCREs from qualified generators. Non-compliance with the NCRE requirements will result in fines. AES GenerAndes currently fulfills the NCRE requirements by utilizing AES Gener'sAndes' solar and biomass power plants and by purchasing NCREs from other generation companies. At present, AES GenerAndes is in the process of negotiating additional NCRE supply contracts to meet the future requirements.
In September 2014, a new emission tax, or green tax, was enacted effective January 2017. EmissionsSince 2017, emissions of PM,particulate matter, SO2, NOxX, and CO2 are monitored for plants with an installed capacity over 50 MW; these emissions are taxed. In the case of CO2, the tax will beis equivalent to $5 per ton emitted. Certain PPAs originating from the SING have clauses allowing the Company to pass the green tax costs to unregulated customers. Distributioncustomers, while some distribution PPAs originating from the SIC do not allow for the pass through of these costs. During 2021, the Chilean General Water Direction, as part of the Ministry of Public Works, established the obligation to install and maintain effective monitoring systems for water withdrawal. We are currently implementing these systems in the power plants for which they are required.
Key Financial DriversDevelopment Strategy Hedge levels at AES Gener limit volatilityAndes is committed to reducing the underlying financial drivers. In addition, financial results are likely to be driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
dry hydrology scenarios;
forced outages;
changes in current regulatory rulings altering the ability to pass through or recover certain costs;
fluctuationscoal intensity of the Chilean peso (our hedging strategy reduces this risk, but some residual risk remains);
tax policy changes;
legislation promotingpower grid and plans to increase the renewable energy and/or more restrictive regulations on thermal generation assets;capacity in its portfolio. As part of this commitment, and
market price risk when re-contracting.
Construction and Development — AES Gener continues in addition to advance the construction of the 531 MW hydroelectric generation that Alto Maipo run-of-the-river hydroelectric plant.will deliver to the system, AES Andes purchased the 110 MW Los Cururos wind farm and its substation in northern Chile, and has finished construction on the 80 MW Andes 2a facility. Also under construction are the 68 MW Mesamávida wind farm, 73 MW Campo Lindo wind farm, and 180 MW Andes Solar 2b facility, which also includes 112 MW of BESS, to supply agreements with its main mining customers in execution of the new Green Blend strategy. In total, the pipeline currently has 3.1 GW under development at different stages and diversified geographically.
On November 17, 2021, Alto Maipo isSpA, the largest project in construction indeveloper of the SEN market. When completed, it will include 75 kmAlto Maipo Hydroelectric Project and subsidiary of tunnels, two power houses and 17 kmAES Andes, filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of transmission lines.the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and Uncertainties—UncertaintiesAlto Maipo.for further information.
AES Andes executes its Green Blend strategy by integrating renewable energy sources into its portfolio, and by providing contracting options that contain a mix of both renewable and nonrenewable solutions.


30 | 2021 Annual Report

Colombia
Business Description — We operate in Colombia through AES Chivor, a subsidiary of AES Andes, which owns a hydroelectric plant with an installed capacity of 1,000 MW and Tunjita, a 20 MW run-of-river hydroelectric plant, both located approximately 160 km east of Bogota, as well as Castilla and San Fernando, 21 MW and 61 MW respectively, both solar facilities. AES Chivor’s installed capacity accounted for approximately 6% of system capacity at the end of 2021. AES Chivor is dependent on hydrological conditions, which influence generation and spot prices of non-contracted generation in Colombia.
AES Chivor's commercial strategy aims to execute contracts with commercial and industrial customers and bid in public tenders, mainly with distribution companies, in order to reduce margin volatility with proper portfolio risk management. The remaining energy generated by our portfolio is sold to the spot market, including ancillary services. Additionally, AES Chivor receives reliability payments for maintaining the plant's availability and generating firm energy during periods of power scarcity, such as adverse hydrological conditions, in order to prevent power shortages.
Key Financial Drivers — Hydrological conditions largely influence Chivor's power generation. Maintaining the appropriate contract level, while maximizing revenue through the sale of excess generation, is key to Chivor's results of operations. In addition to hydrology, financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
forced outages;
fluctuations of the Colombian peso; and
spot market prices.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Electricity supply in Colombia is concentrated in one main system, the SIN, which encompasses one-third of Colombia's territory, providing electricity to 97% of the country's population. The SIN's installed capacity, primarily hydroelectric (68%) and thermal (31%(30%), totaled 17,39217,563 MW as of December 31, 2018.2021. The marked seasonal variations in Colombia's hydrology result in price volatility in the short-term market. In 2018, 84%2021, 82% of total energy demand was supplied by hydroelectric plants.
The electricity sector in Colombia operates under a competitive market framework for the generation and sale of electricity, and a regulated framework for transmission and distribution of electricity. The distinct activities of the electricity sector are governed by Colombian laws and CREG, the CREG,Colombian regulating entity for energy and gas. Other government entities have a role in the electricity industry, including the Ministry of Mines and Energy, which defines the government's policy for the energy sector; the Public Utility Superintendency of Colombia, which is in charge of overseeing utility companies; and the Mining and EnergeticEnergy Planning Unit, which is in charge of expansion of the generation and transmission network.
The generation sector is organized on a competitive basis with companies selling their generation in the wholesale market at the short-term price or under bilateral contracts with other participants, including distribution


companies, generators and traders, and unregulated customers at freely negotiated prices. The National Dispatch Center dispatches generators in merit order based on bid offers in order to ensure that demand will be satisfied by the lowest cost combination of available generating units.
In 2018,The expansion of the Ministrysystem is supported by two schemes: i) reliability charge auctions where firm energy commitments are focused on conventional technology power plants, and ii) auctions of Mines and Energy published the final resolution for renewable energy auctions in Colombia. The auction allocates 12-yearlong-term energy contracts assigned for 1.1 TW/hperiods of 15 years aimed at non-conventional renewable resources.
Development Strategy — AES Colombia is committed to transform into a renewable growth platform by supporting its customers to diversify their energy demand under whichsupply and become more competitive. As part of this commitment, AES Colombia is developing a pipeline of 1.3 GW of solar and wind projects. Six projects (1,149 MW) of wind energy are located in La Guajira, one of the windiest spots on Earth, and two projects (255 MW) were awarded a 15-year PPA at the last renewable generators commit to beauction in commercial operation by December 2021. The auction is scheduled for February 20192019. One project (99 MW) of the Wind Cluster has Environmental License and the regulator expectsEnvironmental Impact Assessment for 308 MW was submitted in August 2021, and the other projects continue to adoptprogress. During 2021 the current regulation forCompany also was awarded a 26 MW solar project through a 15-year PPA and will start construction early 2022. Solar projects have been fundamental in leading the entry of renewable generation to the market during 2019.in Colombia.
Argentina
Business Description We operateAES operates plants in Colombia throughArgentina totaling 4,220 MW, representing 10% of the


31 | 2021 Annual Report

country's total installed capacity. AES Chivor, a subsidiary of AES Gener, which owns a hydroelectric plant with an installed capacitydiversified generation portfolio in Argentina in terms of 1,000 MW,geography, technology, and Tunjita, a 20 MW run-of-river hydroelectric plant, both located approximately 160 km east of Bogota.fuel source. AES Chivor’s installed capacity accounted for approximately 6% of system capacity atArgentina's plants are placed in strategic locations within the end of 2018. AES Chivor is dependent on hydrological conditions, which influence generation and spot prices of non-contracted generationcountry in Colombia.
AES Chivor's commercial strategy aimsorder to execute contracts with commercial and industrial customers, and bid in public tenders for one to four year contracts, mainly with distribution companies to reduce margin volatility with proper portfolio risk management. The remainingprovide energy generated by our portfolio is sold to the spot market including ancillary services. Additionally, and customers, making use of wind, hydro, and thermal plants.
AES Chivor receives reliability payments for maintainingprimarily sells its energy in the plant available during periodswholesale electricity market where prices are largely regulated. In 2020, approximately 86% of the energy was sold in the wholesale electricity market and 14% was sold under contract sales made by TermoAndes, Vientos Neuquinos, and Vientos Bonaerenses power scarcity, such as adverse hydrological conditions, in order to prevent power shortages.plants.
Key Financial Drivers Hydrological conditions largely influence Chivor's power generation. Maintaining the appropriate contract level, while maximizing revenue through the sale of excess generation, is key to Chivor's results of operations. Hedge levels at Chivor limit volatility in the underlying financial drivers. In addition to hydrology, financialFinancial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
forced outages;
exposure to fluctuations of the ColombianArgentine peso;
changes in hydrology and wind resources;
spot market prices.timely collection of FONINVEMEM installments and outstanding receivables (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below);
Argentinanatural gas prices and availability for contracted generation at TermoAndes; and
domestic energy demand and exports.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Argentina has one main power system, the SADI, which serves 96% of the country. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the installed capacity of the SADI totaled 38,53842,989 MW. The SADI's installed capacity is composed primarily of thermoelectric generation (64%(60%) and hydroelectric generation (28%(26%), as well as wind (8%), nuclear (4%), and solar (2%).
Thermoelectric generation in the SADI is primarily natural gas. However, scarcity of natural gas during winter periods (June to August), due to transport constraints result in the use of alternative fuels, such as oil and coal. The SADI is also highly reliant on hydroelectric plants. Hydrological conditions impact reservoir water levels and largely influence the dispatch of the system's hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation plants and, therefore, influence market costs. Precipitation in Argentina occurs principally between June and August.from May to October.
Regulatory Framework The Argentine regulatory framework divides the electricity sector into generation, transmission, and distribution. The wholesale electric market is comprised of generation companies, transmission companies, distribution companies, and large customers who are permitted to trade electricity. Generation companies can sell their output in the spot market or under PPAs. CAMMESA manages the electricity market and is responsible for dispatch coordination. The Electricity National Regulatory Agency is in charge of regulating public service activities and the Secretariat of Energy regulates system framework and grants concessions or authorizations for sector activities. In Argentina, there is a tolling scheme in which the regulator establishes the prices for electricity and defines fuel and adjusts them periodically for inflation, changes in fuel prices and other factors.reference prices. As a result, our businesses are particularly sensitive to changes in regulation.
The Argentine electric market is an "average cost" system, with generators beingsystem. Generators are compensated for fixed costs and non-fuel variable costs, plus a rateunder prices denominated in Argentine pesos. CAMMESA is in charge of return. All fuel, except coal, can be providedproviding the natural gas and liquid fuels required by CAMMESA. In December 2018, Resolution 70/2018 was enacted. This allowsthe generation companies, to buy fuel directly from producers or from CAMMESA.except for coal.
Argentina’s administration continues introducing regulatory improvements aiming to normalize the energy sector. Among others, Resolution 19/2017 was enacted in 2017 to set higher tariffs, denominated in USD, for energy and capacity prices. The enactment of resolution 19/2017 ceased the remuneration intended to fund increased capacity projects . Likewise, long term USD-denominated PPAs have been awarded to develop 9.4 GW


of new capacity (thermal and renewable) through the execution of competitive auctions. During 2018,2021, although the government has continuedincreased prices to increasethe end user, prices to reduce subsidies and decreasethe system deficit.deficit also increased. By December 2021, distribution companies recovered an average 37% of the total cost of the system.
AES Argentina has contributed certain accounts receivable to fund the construction of new power plants under FONINVEMEM agreements. These receivables accrue interest and arehave been collected in monthly installments over 10 years onceafter commercial operation date of the related plants begin to operate.plant took place. AES Argentina hasparticipated in the construction of three FONINVEMEM funds related to operationalpower plants under which payments are being received.the FONINVEMEM structure, and in addition to the repayment of the accounts receivable contributed, AES Argentina will receive a pro rata ownership interest in each of these plants once the accounts receivables have been fully repaid. FONINVEMEM I and II installments were fully repaid in the first quarter of 2020 and in 2021 the ownership interests in Termoeléctrica San Martín and Termoeléctrica Manuel Belgrano were defined after the incorporation of the National Government as majority shareholder. The transfer of the property of the power plants to these companies has not occured yet. FONINVEMEM III installments, related to Termoeléctrica Guillermo Brown which commenced operations in April 2016, are still being collected. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital Resources and Liquidity—Long-Term Receivables and Note 6.7.Financing Receivables in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further discussion of receivables in Argentina.
In 2020 and 2021, the Argentine peso devalued against the USD by approximately 29% and 18%, respectively, and Argentina’s economy continued to be highly inflationary. Since September 2019, currency controls


32 | 2021 Annual Report

have been established to govern the devaluation of the Argentine peso and keep Argentine central bank reserves at acceptable levels for the next government of Argentina.
Development Strategy — Currently, 890 MW of renewable greenfield projects are in early and mid stages of development. These projects could be used to participate in future private PPAs or public auctions. In addition, "behind the meter” and off-grid solutions are being developed for the industrial mining sector.
Brazil
Business Description AES Brasil has a portfolio of 12 hydroelectric power plants in the state of São Paulo with total installed capacity of 2,658 MW. These hydroelectric plants operate under a 33-year concession expiring in 2032.
Over the past three years, AES Brasil acquired and developed three solar power complexes in the state of São Paulo, which are fully contracted with 20-year PPAs and together account for 295 MW of installed capacity. AES Brasil represents approximately 11% of the total generation capacity in the state of São Paulo.
AES Brasil also owns Alto Sertão II, a wind complex located in the state of Bahia with an installed capacity of 386 MW and subject to 20-year PPAs expiring between 2033 and 2035, and in December 2020, also acquired the Ventus wind complex located in the state of Rio Grande do Norte with an installed capacity of 187 MW and subject to a 20-year PPA expiring in 2034.
In April 2021, AES Brasil acquired Mandacaru and Salinas (formerly MS Wind and Santos Wind Complexes, respectively), located in the states of Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará, in the northeast region of Brazil. The complexes have been operational since 2014 with 159 MW of installed capacity, fully sold in the regulated market for 20 years.
In the second half of 2020, AES acquired an additional 19.8% ownership in AES Brasil and on December 31, 2020 its economic interest was 44.1%. Through multiple transactions in 2021, AES acquired an additional 1.6% ownership in AES Brasil. Additionally, AES migrated AES Brasil's shares to the Novo Mercado, which is a listing segment of the Brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance in Brazil, requiring equity capital to be composed only of common shares. The reorganization and the exchange of shares was completed on March 26, 2021, and the shares issued by AES Brasil started trading on Novo Mercado on March 29, 2021. The Company maintained majority representation on AES Brasil’s board of directors.
On October 1, 2021, as part of the reorganization process, AES Brasil concluded a follow-on offering for the issuance of 93,000,000 newly issued shares to fund its renewable energy portfolio at a cost of $207 million. As a result, AES' indirect beneficial interest in AES Brasil increased 1%, from 45.7% to 46.7%. As of December 31, 2018,2021, AES operates plants totaling 4,129 MW, representing 11%owned 47% of AES Brasil and is the country's total installed capacity.controlling shareholder. The installed capacityCompany consolidates AES Brasil's results in the SADI includes the TermoAndes plant, a subsidiary of AES Gener, which is connected both to the SADI and the Chilean SEN markets. AES Argentina has a diversified generation portfolio.South America SBU reportable segment.
AES primarily sellsBrasil aims to contract most of its energyphysical guarantee requirements and sell the remaining portion in the wholesale electricity market where prices are largely regulated. In 2018, approximately 93% of the energy was sold in the wholesale electricity market and 7% was sold under contract, as a result of contract sales made by TermoAndes.
Foreign currency controls were lifted in December 2015, allowing the Argentine pesospot market. The commercial strategy is reassessed periodically according to float under the administration of the Argentinian Central Bank. In 2018, the Argentine peso devalued by approximately 102% and Argentina’s economy was determined to be highly inflationary. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis Key Trends and Uncertainties of this Form 10-K for further discussion.
Tax Regulation — On December 29, 2017, Law 27430 was enacted in Argentina, which introduced a tax reform with several changes in the Argentine tax system, effective on January 1, 2018. This tax reform reduced the statutory corporate tax rate of companies from 35% to 30% in 2018market conditions, hydrology, and 2019, and will reduce the rate to 25% from 2020 onward. The law also eliminated the Equalization Tax on the distribution of earnings generated after January 1, 2018. The Equalization Tax was replaced with a withholding tax on dividends at the rate of 7% for 2018 and 2019, and 13% from 2020 onward.other factors. AES Brasil generally sells available energy through medium-term bilateral contracts.
Key Financial Drivers FinancialThe electricity market in Brazil is highly dependent on hydroelectric generation, therefore electricity pricing is driven by hydrology. Plant availability is also a significant financial driver as in times of high hydrology, AES is more exposed to the spot market. AES Brasil's financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
forced outages;hydrology, impacting quantity of energy generated in the MRE (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below for further information);
exposuregrowth in demand for energy;
market price risk when re-contracting;
asset management;
cost management; and
ability to fluctuations of the Argentine peso;
changes in hydrology;
timely collection of FONINVEMEM installment and outstanding receivables (See Note 6.—execute on its growth strategy.Financing Receivables in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further discussion); and
natural gas prices and availability for contracted generation.
Brazil
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — In Brazil, the Ministry of Mines and Energy determines the maximum amount of energy a generation plant can sell, called physical guarantee, representing the long-term average expected energy production of the plant. Under current rules, physical guarantee energy can be sold to distribution companies through long-term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large


33 | 2021 Annual Report

consumers or energy trading companies.
Brazil has installed capacity of 162,932 MW, which is primarily184 GW, composed of hydroelectric (64%(60%), thermoelectric (25%), renewable (14%), and nuclear (1%) and renewables (19%).sources. Operation is centralized and controlled by the national operator, ONS, and regulated by ANEEL.the Brazilian National Electric Energy Agency ("ANEEL"). The ONS dispatches generators based on their marginal cost of production and on the risk of system rationing. Key variables for the dispatch decision are forecasted hydrological conditions, reservoir levels, electricity demand, fuel prices, and thermal generation availability.
In case of unfavorable hydrology, the ONS will reduce hydroelectric dispatch to preserve reservoir levels and increase dispatch of thermal plants to meet demand. The consequences of unfavorable hydrology are (i) higher energy spot prices due to higher energy production costs byat thermal plants and (ii) the need for hydro plants to purchase energy in the spot market to fulfill their contractual obligations.
A mechanism known as the MRE was created under ONS to share hydrological risk across MRE hydro generators.generators by using a generation scaling factor ("GSF") to adjust generators' physical guarantee during periods of hydrological scarcity. If the hydro plants generate less than the total MRE physical guarantee, the hydro generators may


need to purchase energy in the short-term market. When total hydro generation is higher than the total MRE physical guarantee, the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they may sell the excess energy on the spot market.
Business DescriptionIn September 2020, Law 14.052/2020 published by ANEEL was approved by the President, establishing terms for compensation to MRE hydro generators for the incorrect application of the GSF mechanism from 2013 to 2018, which resulted in higher charges assessed to MRE hydro generators by the regulator. Under the law, compensation was in the form of an offer for a concession extension for each hydro generator in exchange for full payment of billed GSF trade payables, the amount of which was reduced in conjunction with the payment for a concession extension. On August 12, 2021, ANEEL published Resolution number 2.919/2021, establishing an extension for the end of the concession originally granted to AES Brasil's hydroelectric plants, from 2029 to 2032.
Development Strategy Tietê has a portfolio of 12 hydroelectric power plants in the state of São Paulo with total installed capacity of 2,658 MW. Tietê represents approximately 10% of the total generation capacity in the state of São Paulo. Tietê hydroelectric plants operate under a 30-year concession expiring in 2029. AES owns 24% of Tietê and is the controlling shareholder and manages and consolidates this business. Tietê aims to contract most of its physical guarantee requirements and sell the remaining portion in the spot market. The commercial strategy is reassessed periodically according to changes in market conditions, hydrology and other factors. Tietê generally sells available energy through medium-term bilateral contracts.
Tietê'sBrasil's strategy is to grow by adding renewable capacity to its generation platform. In 2017, Tietêplatform through acquisition or greenfield projects, to focus on client satisfaction and innovation to offer new products and energy solutions, and to be recognized for excellence in asset management.
On May 21, 2021, AES Brasil acquired Alto Sertão IIthe Cajuína Wind Complex (“Alto Sertãphase I (Santa Tereza with installed capacity of 420 MW) and on July 29, 2021, AES Brasil acquired phase II (São II”) locatedRicardo with installed capacity of 437 MW). The two complexes are greenfield wind power projects in the states of Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará with potential installed capacity up to 1.2 GW total. Of this total capacity, 211 MW is committed with long-term PPAs signed in February 2021 with Ferbasa (165 MW) and Minasliga (46 MW), for energy supply over a period of 20 years beginning in 2024 and 2023, respectively. Additionally, on August 16, 2021, AES Brasil signed an investment agreement with BRF to develop a project of 160 MW through a joint venture partnership, of which 80 MW will be fulfilled through a 15-year PPA starting in 2024.
On July 19, 2021, AES Brasil acquired the Serra Verde project, which complements the Cajuína Complex mentioned above. This project has 279 MW of installable capacity of greenfield wind power in the state of Bahia,Rio Grande do Norte. A 13-year PPA was signed with anCopel for 11 MW, starting in 2023.
On October 26, 2021, AES Brasil signed a 15-year PPA with Alcoa for 150 MW, starting in 2024. AES Brasil is seeking long-term PPAs to fulfill the remaining installed capacity at the Cajuína Complex.
On December 22, 2021, AES Tucano Holding I S.A., a subsidiary of 386 MW and subject to 20-year PPAs expiring between 2033 and 2035. Furthermore, in 2017 Tiete acquired Boa Hora Solar, a solar development project and won a bidAES Brasil, signed an investment agreement with Unipar Indupa do Brasil S.A. ("Unipar"), to develop a secondproject of 40 MW through a joint venture partnership, with a 19-year PPA starting in 2024.
On December 28, 2021, AES Brasil acquired Sky Arinos, a solar project AGV Solar,with installable capacity of 459 MW, in the city of Arinos in the state of São Paulo. In 2018, Tietê acquired Guaimbê, a solar power complex. All the solar assets are fully contracted with 20 year PPAs. Through its ownership of Tietê, AES owns a 24% economic interest in those entities. These assets are not subject to return at the end of the concession.Minas Gerais.
Under the current terms of the 2018 legal agreement in connection with AES Brasil's concession agreement, Tietêwith the state government, AES Brasil is required to increase its capacity in the state of São Paulo by 15% (or 398 MW). The above mentioned investments in newan additional 81 MW by October 2024. On November 30, 2021 AES Brasil acquired AGV Solar VII Geradora de Energia S.A, a special purpose entity with installable capacity of 33 MW of solar generation capacity in the state of São Paulo allowed Tietê to sign a legal agreement in October 2018 with the state government in which it was agreed that: (i) 80% of the expansion obligation (317 MW) was delivered or is in performance stage; and (ii) the Company will have up to six years from the agreement's approval date to meet the remaining balance (81 MW).
Uruguaiana is a 640 MW gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of Uruguaiana in the state of Rio Grande do Sul.generation. AES manages and has a 46% economic interest in the plant. The plant's operations have been largely suspended due to the unavailability of gas. The plant operated for short periods of time in 2013, 2014 and 2015 when short-term supply of LNG was sourced for the facility. The plant did not operate in 2016, 2017 or 2018. AES has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to Uruguaiana. Capacity restrictions on the Argentinean pipeline are a challenge, especially during the winter season when gas demand in Argentina is very high. UruguaianaBrasil continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis.pursue new opportunities to achieve the additional capacity.


34 | 2021 Annual Report
Key Financial Drivers
aes-20211231_g9.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.
— As the system is highly dependent on hydroelectric generation, electricity pricing is driven by hydrology in Brazil. Plant availability is also a significant financial driver as in times of high hydrology AES is more exposed to the spot market. The availability of gas is also a driver for continued operations at Uruguaiana. Tietê's financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
hydrology, impacting quantity of energy generated in MRE;


demand growth;
re-contracting price;
asset management and plant availability;
cost management; and
ability to execute on its growth strategy.
35 | 2021 Annual Report
Construction and Development — As part of the initiative to pursue opportunities in renewable generation discussed above, Tietê is currently constructing photovoltaic power plants with a total projected capacity of 144 MW, subject to 20 year PPAs. Commercial operation of first phase, Boa Hora Solar, and of the second phase, AGV Solar, is expected in the first half of 2019.



MCAC SBU
Our MCAC SBU has a portfolio of generation facilities, including renewable energy, in three countries, with a total capacity of 3,205 MW as of December 31, 2018.3,290 MW.
Generation — The following table lists our MCAC SBU generation facilities:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
DPP (Los Mina) Dominican Republic Gas 358
 85% 1996 2022 CDEEEDPP (Los Mina)Dominican RepublicGas358 85 %19962022Andres, CDEEE, Non-Regulated Users
Andres Dominican Republic Gas 319
 85% 2003 2022 Ede Norte/Ede Este/Ede Sur/Non-Regulated Users
Itabo (1)
 Dominican Republic Coal 295
 43% 2000 2022 Ede Norte/Ede Este/Ede Sur
Andres (1)
Andres (1)
Dominican RepublicGas319 85 %20032022Ede Norte, Ede Este, Ede Sur, Non-Regulated Users
BayasolBayasolDominican RepublicSolar50 85 %20212024Falcondo
Andres ES Dominican Republic Energy Storage 10
 85% 2017 Andres ESDominican RepublicEnergy Storage10 85 %2017
Los Mina DPP ES Dominican Republic Energy Storage 10
 85% 2017 Los Mina DPP ESDominican RepublicEnergy Storage10 85 %2017
Dominican Republic Subtotal 992
   Dominican Republic Subtotal747 
Merida III Mexico Gas 505
 75% 2000 2025 Comision Federal de ElectricidadMerida IIIMexicoGas/Diesel505 75 %20002025Comision Federal de Electricidad
Mesa La Paz (2)
Mesa La Paz (2)
MexicoWind306 50 %20192045Fuentes de Energia Peñoles
Termoelectrica del Golfo (TEG) Mexico Pet Coke 275
 99% 2007 2027 CEMEXTermoelectrica del Golfo (TEG)MexicoPet Coke275 99 %20072027CEMEX
Termoelectrica del Penoles (TEP) Mexico Pet Coke 275
 99% 2007 2027 PenolesTermoelectrica del Penoles (TEP)MexicoPet Coke275 99 %20072027Peñoles
Mexico Subtotal 1,055
   Mexico Subtotal1,361 
Colon (2)(3)
 Panama Gas 381
 50% 2018 2028 Electra Noreste/Edemet/EdechiPanamaGas381 50 %20182028ENSA, Edemet, Edechi
Bayano Panama Hydro 260
 49% 1999 2030 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/OtherBayanoPanamaHydro260 49 %19992030ENSA, Edemet, Edechi, Other
Changuinola Panama Hydro 223
 90% 2011 2030 AES PanamaChanguinolaPanamaHydro223 90 %20112030AES Panama
Chiriqui-Esti Panama Hydro 120
 49% 2003 2030 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/OtherChiriqui-EstiPanamaHydro120 49 %20032030ENSA, Edemet, Edechi, Other
Estrella del Mar I Panama Heavy Fuel Oil 72
 49% 2015 2020 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/Other
Penonome IPenonome IPanamaWind55 49 %20202023-2030Altenergy, ENSA, Edement, Edechi
Chiriqui-Los Valles Panama Hydro 54
 49% 1999 2030 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/OtherChiriqui-Los VallesPanamaHydro54 49 %19992030ENSA, Edemet, Edechi, Other
Chiriqui-La Estrella Panama Hydro 48
 49% 1999 2030 Electra Noreste/Edemet/Edechi/OtherChiriqui-La EstrellaPanamaHydro48 49 %19992030ENSA, Edemet, Edechi, Other
Pesé SolarPesé SolarPanamaSolar10 49 %20212030Various
Mayorca SolarMayorca SolarPanamaSolar10 49 %20212030Various
CedroCedroPanamaSolar10 49 %2021
CaobaCaobaPanamaSolar10 49 %2021
5B Costa Norte5B Costa NortePanamaSolar100 %20212051Costa Norte LGN Terminal
Panama Subtotal 1,158
   Panama Subtotal1,182 
 3,205
   
3,290 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)Plant also includes an adjacent regasification facility, as well as a 70 TBTU LNG storage tank.
(2)Unconsolidated entity, accounted for as an equity affiliate.
(3)Plant also includes an adjacent regasification facility, as well as an 80 TBTU LNG storage tank.
Itabo plants: Itabo complex (two coal-fired steam turbines and one gas-fired steam turbine).
(2)
Plant also includes an adjacent regasification facility, as well as a 180,000 m3 LNG storage tank, which is expected to come on-line in 2019.
Under construction — The following table lists our plants under construction in the MCAC SBU: 
BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestExpected Date of Commercial Operations
GatunPanamaGas670 49 %2H 2024
Panama Subtotal670 
SantanasolDominican RepublicSolar50 85 %2H 2022
Dominican Republic Subtotal (1)
50 
720 
_____________________________
(1)A second 50 TBTU LNG storage tank is under construction and expected to come on-line in the first half of 2023.
In April 2021, the Company completed the sale of its 43% ownership interest in Itabo, a coal-fired plant located in the Dominican Republic.


Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Expected Date of Commercial Operations
Mesa La Paz Mexico Wind 306
 50% 1H 2020
36 | 2021 Annual Report



The following map illustrates the location of our MCAC facilities:
MCAC Businesses
mcacmap.jpgaes-20211231_g10.jpg
Dominican Republic
Business Description — AES Dominicana consists of three operating subsidiaries: Andres, Los Mina, and Bayasol. With a total of 747 MW of installed capacity, AES provides 14% of the country's capacity and supplies approximately 22% of the country's energy demand via these generation facilities. 668 MW is predominantly contracted until 2022 with government-owned distribution companies and large customers.
AES has a strategic partnership with the Estrella and Linda Groups ("Estrella-Linda"), a consortium of two leading Dominican industrial groups that manage a diversified business portfolio.
Andres, Los Mina, and Bayasol are owned 85% by AES. Andres owns and operates a combined cycle natural gas turbine and an energy storage facility with combined generation capacity of 329 MW, as well as the only LNG import terminal in the country, with 160,000 cubic meters of storage capacity. Los Mina owns and operates a combined cycle facility with two natural gas turbines and an energy storage facility with combined generation capacity of 368 MW. Bayasol owns and operates a 50 MW solar farm.
AES Dominicana has a long-term LNG purchase contract through 2023 for 33.6 trillion btu/year with a price linked to NYMEX Henry Hub. The LNG contract terms allow delivery to various markets in Latin America. These plants capitalize on the competitively-priced LNG contract by selling power where the market is dominated by fuel oil-based generation. Andres has a long-term contract to sell regasified LNG to industrial users within the Dominican Republic using compression technology to transport it within the country, thereby capturing demand from industrial and commercial customers.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
changes in spot prices due to fluctuations in commodity prices (since fuel is a pass-through cost under the PPAs, any variation in oil prices will impact spot sales for Andres);
contracting levels and the extent of capacity awarded; and


37 | 2021 Annual Report

growth in domestic natural gas demand, supported by new infrastructure such as the Eastern Pipeline and second LNG tank.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Dominican Republic energy market is a decentralized industry consisting of generation, transmission, and distribution businesses. Generation companies can earn revenue through short- and long-term PPAs, ancillary services, and a competitive wholesale generation market. All generation, transmission, and distribution companies are subject to and regulated by the General Electricity Law.
Two main agencies are responsible for monitoring compliance with the General Electricity Law:
The National Energy Commission drafts and coordinates the legal framework and regulatory legislation. They propose and adopt policies and procedures to implement best practices, support the proper functioning and development of the energy sector, and promote investment.
The Superintendence of Electricity's main responsibilities include monitoring compliance with legal provisions, rules, and technical procedures governing generation, transmission, distribution, and commercialization of electricity. They monitor behavior in the electricity market in order to avoidprevent monopolistic practices.
In addition to the two agencies responsible for monitoring compliance with the General Electricity Law, the IndustrialMinistry of Industry and Commerce Ministry supervises commercial and industrial activities in the Dominican Republic as well as the fuels and natural gas commercialization to the end users.
The Dominican Republic has one main interconnected system with approximately 3,8005,027 MW of installed capacity, composed primarily of thermal (78%(74%), hydroelectric (16%(12%), wind (4%(7%), and solar (2%(7%) generation plants/farms..

Development Strategy — AES will continue to develop the commercialization of natural gas and incorporate partners directly in gas infrastructure projects. AES partnered with Energas in a joint venture which has been operating the 50 km Eastern Pipeline since February 2020. The joint venture is also developing a new LNG facility of 120,000 cubic meters, including additional storage, regasification, and truck loading capacity, for which the COD is expected by 2023. This will allow AES to reach new customers who have converted, or are in the process of converting, to natural gas as a fuel source, and better operational flexibility.

Panama
Business Description — AES Dominicana consists of three operating subsidiaries, Itabo, Andres and Los Mina. With a total of 992 MW of installed capacity, AES has 26% of the system capacity and supplies approximately 40% of energy demand via these generation facilities. 821 MW is mostly contracted until 2022 with government-owned distribution companies and large customers.
AES has a strategic partnership with the Estrella and Linda Groups ("Estrella-Linda"), a consortium of two leading Dominican industrial groups that manage a diversified business portfolio.
Itabo is 42.5% owned by AES. Itabo owns and operates twofive hydroelectric plants totaling 705 MW of generation capacity, a natural gas-fired power plant with 381 MW of generation capacity, a wind farm of 55 MW and four solar plants of 10 MW each, which collectively represent 31% of the total installed capacity in Panama. Furthermore, AES operates an LNG regasification facility, a 180,000 cubic meter storage tank, and a truck loading facility.
The majority of our hydroelectric plants in Panama are based on run-of-the-river technology, with the exception of 223 MW Changuinola plant with regulation reservoirs and the 260 MW Bayano plant. Hydrological conditions have an important influence on profitability. Variations in hydrology can result in an excess or a shortfall in energy production relative to our contractual obligations. Hydro generation is generally in a shortfall position during the dry season from January through May, which is offset by thermal powerand wind generation unitssince its behavior is opposite and complementary to hydro generation.
Our hydro and thermal assets are mainly contracted through medium to long-term PPAs with distribution companies. A small volume of our hydro plants are contracted with unregulated users. Our hydro assets in Panama have PPAs with distribution companies expiring up to December 2030 for a total of 295 MW of installed capacity.
Andres and Los Mina are owned 85% by AES. Andres has a combined cycle natural gas turbine, an energy storage solution and generationcontracted capacity of 329 MW as well as the only LNG import facility377 MW. Our thermal asset in the country,Panama has PPAs with 160,000 cubic meters of storage capacity. Los Mina hasdistribution companies for a combined cycle with two natural gas turbines, an energy storage solution and generationtotal contracted capacity of 368 MW.
AES Dominicana has a long-term LNG purchase contract through 2023 for 33.6 trillion btu/year with a price linked to NYMEX Henry Hub. The LNG contract terms allow delivery to various markets350 MW expiring in Latin America. These plants capitalize on the competitively-priced LNG contract by selling power where the market is dominated by fuel oil-based generation. Andres has a long-term contract to sell re-gasified LNG to industrial users within the Dominican Republic using compression technology to transport it within the country, thereby capturing demand from industrial and commercial customers.August 2028.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
changes in spothydrology, which impacts commodity prices dueand exposes the business to variability in the cost of replacement power;
fluctuations in commodity prices, (since fuel is a pass-throughmainly oil and natural gas, which affect the cost underof thermal generation and spot prices;
constraints imposed by the PPAs, any variation in oil prices will impactcapacity of transmission lines connecting the spot sales for both Andreswest side of the country with the load, keeping surplus power trapped during the rainy season; and Itabo);
contracting levels and the extent of capacity awarded;
supply shortages in the near term (next two to three years) may provide opportunities for short term upside, but new generationcountry demand as GDP growth is expected to come online beginning 2019;remain strong over the short and medium term.
additional sales derived from domestic natural gas demand are expected to continue providing income and growth based on the entry of future projects and the fees from the infrastructure service.


38 | 2021 Annual Report
Panama
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Panamanian power sector is composed of three distinct operating business units: generation, distribution, and transmission. Generators can enter into short-term and long-term PPAs with distributors or unregulated consumers. In addition, generators can enter into alternative supply contracts with each other. Outside of the PPA market,PPAs, generators may buy and sell energy in the short-term market. Generators can only contract up to their firm capacity.
Three main agencies are responsible for monitoring compliance with the General Electricity Law:
The SNENational Secretary of Energy in Panama ("SNE") has the responsibilities of planning, supervising, and controlling policies of the energy sector within Panama. With these responsibilities, theThe SNE proposes laws and regulations to the executive agencies that regulate the procurement of energy and hydrocarbons for the country.
The regulatorNational Authority of public services, known as the ASEP,Public Services ("ASEP") is an autonomous agency of the government. ASEP is responsible for the control and oversight of public services in Panama, including electricity, the transmission and distribution of natural gas utilities, and the companies that provide such services.
The National Dispatch Center ("CND") implements the economic dispatch of electricity in the wholesale market. The National Dispatch Center's objectives are to minimize the total cost of generation and maintain the reliability and security of the electric power system. Short-term power prices are determined on an hourly basis by the last dispatched generating unit. Physical generation of energy is determined by the National Dispatch Center regardless of contractual arrangements.
Panama's current total installed capacity is 3,5013,849 MW, composed primarily of hydroelectric (49%(46%), thermal (37%), wind (7%), and thermal (40%solar (10%) generation.
Business DescriptionDevelopment Strategy AES owns and operates five hydroelectric plants and two thermoelectric power plants, Estrella del Mar I and Colon, representing 705 MW and 453 MW of hydro and thermal capacity, respectively and 33% of the total installedGiven our LNG facility’s excess capacity in Panama.Panama, the company is developing natural gas supply solutions for third parties such as power generators and industrial and commercial customers. This strategy will support a growing demand for natural gas in the region and will contribute to AES' mission by reducing CO2 emissions as a result of using LNG.
The majority of hydroelectric plantsIn addition to investing in Panama are based on run-of-river technology, withLNG infrastructure, AES is investing in renewable projects within the exception of the 260 MW Bayano plant. Hydrological conditions have an important influence on profitability. Variations in hydrology


can result in excess or a shortfall in energy production relative to our contract obligations. Hydro generation is generally in a shortfall position during the dry season from January through May, while thermal assets are expected to be in a long position as their behavior is opposite and complimentary to hydro generation.
Both hydro and thermal assets are mainly contracted through medium- to long-term PPAs with distribution companies. A small volume of contracts are with unregulated users.
Hydroregion. This will increase complementary non-hydro renewable assets in Panama have PPAs with distribution companies up to December 2030 for a total contracted capacity of 350 MW. Thermal assets in Panama have PPAs with distribution companies for a total contracted capacity of 430 MW, of which 80 MW will expire in June 2020the system and 350 MW will expire in December 2028.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
changes in hydrology which impacts commodity prices and exposes the business to variability in the cost of replacement power;
fluctuations in commodity prices, mainly oil and natural gas, affect the cost of thermal generation and spot prices;
constraints imposed by the capacity of the transmission lines connecting the west side of the country with the load, keeping surplus power trapped during the wet season; and
country demand as GDP growth is expected to remain strong over the short and medium term.
Construction and Development — In August 2015, AES executed a partnership agreement with Deeplight Corporation, a minority partner, to construct, operate, and maintain a natural gas power generation plant and a liquefied natural gas terminal, in order to purchase and sell energy and capacity as well as commercialize natural gas and other ancillary activities related to natural gas. The combined cycle natural gas power generation plant initiated operations in September 2018 and the liquefied natural gas storage and regasification facility is scheduled for completion in the second half of 2019.
Mexico
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Mexico has a single electric grid, the National Electricity System, covering all of Mexico's territory through the Interconnected National Electricity, Baja California and Southern Baja California Systems. The market comprises generation, transmission, distribution and commercialization segments.
Three main agencies, in additioncontribute to the Ministryreduction of Energy, are responsible for monitoring compliance with the Electric Industry Law:
The Energy Regulatory Commission is responsible for the establishment of directives, orders, methodologies and standards oriented to regulate the electric and fuel markets.
The National Center for Energy Control, as new ISO, is responsible for managing the wholesale electricity market, transmission and distribution infrastructure, planning the network developments, guaranteeing open access to network infrastructure, executing competitive mechanisms to cover regulated demand, and setting transmission charges.
The CFE owns the transmission and distribution grids and it is also the country's basic supplier. CFE is the offtaker for IPP generators, and together with its own power units has more than 50% of the current generation market share.hydrological risk in Panama.
Mexico has an installed capacity totaling 74 GW with a generation mix primarily comprising of thermal (71%) and hydroelectric (17%) plants.
Business Description — AES has 1,0551,361 MW of installed capacity in Mexico. The TEG and TEP pet coke-fired plants, located in Tamuin, San Luis Potosi, supply power to their offtakers under long-term PPAs expiring in 2027 with a 90% availability guarantee. TEG and TEP secure their fuel under a long-term contract.
Merida is a CCGT located in Merida, on Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula. Merida sells power to the CFE under a capacity and energy based long-term PPA through 2025. Additionally, the plant purchases natural gas and diesel fuel under a long-term contract with one of the CFE’s subsidiaries, the cost of which is then passed through to the CFE under the terms of the PPA.


Mesa La Paz is a 306 MW wind project developed under a joint venture with Grupo Bal, located in Llera, Tamaulipas. Mesa La Paz sells 82% of its power under long-term PPAs expiring up to 2045.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
asfully contracting the companies, are fully contracted,providing additional benefits from improved operational performance, provides additional benefits, including performance incentives and/or excess energy sales; and
changes in the methodology to calculate spot energy prices or Locational Marginal Prices, which impacts the excess energy sales to CFE.the CFE (see Regulatory Framework and Market Structure below) in (i) TEG and TEP under self-supply scheme, and (ii) Mesa La Paz under the New Market Rules; and
Constructionimproved operational performance and plant availability.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — Mexico´s main electrical system is called the National Interconnected System ("SIN"), which geographically covers an area from Puerto Peñasco, Sonora to Cozumel, Quintana Roo. Mexico also has three isolated electrical systems: (1) the Baja California Interconnected System, which is interconnected with the WECC; (2) the Baja California Sur Interconnected System; and (3) the Mulegé Interconnected System, a very small electrical system. All three are isolated from the SIN and from each other. The Mexican power industry comprises the activities of generation, transmission, distribution, and commercialization segments, considering transmission and distribution to be exclusive state services.


39 | 2021 Annual Report

In addition to the Ministry of Energy, three main agencies are responsible for regulating the market agents and their activities, monitoring compliance with the Electric Industry Law and the Market Rules, and the surveillance of operational compliance and management of the wholesale electricity market:
The Energy Regulatory Commission is responsible for the establishment of directives, orders, methodologies, and standards to regulate the electric and fuel markets, as well as granting permits.
The National Center for Energy Control, as an ISO, is responsible for managing the wholesale electricity market, transmission and distribution infrastructure, planning network developments, guaranteeing open access to network infrastructure, executing competitive mechanisms to cover regulated demand, and setting transmission charges.
The Electricity Federal Commission ("CFE") owns the transmission and distribution grids and is also the country's basic supplier. CFE is the offtaker for IPP generators, and together with its own power units has more than 50% of the current generation market share.
Mexico has an installed capacity totaling 89 GW with a generation mix composed of thermal (63%), hydroelectric (14%), wind (9%), solar (8%), and other fuel sources (6%).
Development Strategy — AES has partnered with Grupo Bal in a joint venture with Grupo BAL to co-invest in power and related infrastructure projects in Mexico, focusing on renewable and natural gas generation.
The first development, a 306 MW wind project, began construction in 2018 and is expected to be completed in 2020.

40 | 2021 Annual Report

aes-20211231_g11.jpg
(1) Non-GAAP measure. See Item 7.—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for reconciliation and definition.



41 | 2021 Annual Report

Eurasia SBU
Generation — Our Eurasia SBU has generation facilities in six countries. Operatingfive countries with total operating installed capacity totaled 4,578of 2,791 MW. The following table lists our Eurasia SBU generation facilities:
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Year Acquired or Began Operation Contract Expiration Date Customer(s)BusinessLocationFuelGross MWAES Equity InterestYear Acquired or Began OperationContract Expiration DateCustomer(s)
Maritza Bulgaria Coal 690
 100% 2011 2026 Natsionalna ElektricheskaMaritzaBulgariaCoal690 100 %20112026NEK
St. Nikola Bulgaria Wind 156
 89% 2010 2025 Natsionalna ElektricheskaSt. NikolaBulgariaWind156 89 %20102025Electricity Security Fund
Bulgaria Subtotal 846
   Bulgaria Subtotal846 
OPGC (1)
 India Coal 420
 49% 1998 2026 GRID Corporation Ltd.
Delhi ES India Energy Storage 10
 60% 2019 Delhi ESIndiaEnergy Storage10 60 %2019
India Subtotal 430
   India Subtotal10 
Amman East Jordan Gas 381
 37% 2009 2033 National Electric Power Company
IPP4 Jordan Heavy Fuel Oil 250
 36% 2014 2039 National Electric Power Company
Amman East (1)
Amman East (1)
JordanGas381 37 %20092033National Electric Power Company
IPP4 (1)
IPP4 (1)
JordanHeavy Fuel Oil250 36 %20142039National Electric Power Company
AM SolarAM SolarJordanSolar52 36 %20192039National Electric Power Company
Jordan Subtotal 631
   Jordan Subtotal683 
Netherlands ES Netherlands Energy Storage 10
 100% 2015 Netherlands ESNetherlandsEnergy Storage10 100 %2015
Netherlands Subtotal 10
   Netherlands Subtotal10 
Ballylumford (2)
 United Kingdom Gas 708
 100% 2010 2023 Power NI/I-SEM
Kilroot (3)
 United Kingdom Coal/Oil 701
 99% 1992 I-SEM
Kilroot ES United Kingdom Energy Storage 10
 100% 2015 
United Kingdom Subtotal 1,419
   
Mong Duong 2 Vietnam Coal 1,242
 51% 2015 2040 EVN
Mong Duong 2 (2)
Mong Duong 2 (2)
VietnamCoal1,242 51 %20152040EVN
Vietnam Subtotal 1,242
   Vietnam Subtotal1,242 
 4,578
   2,791 
_____________________________
(1)
Unconsolidated entity, the results of operations of which are reflected in Equity in Earnings of Affiliates.
(2)
The Ballylumford B Station began the process for a safe shutdown in December 2018.
(3)
Includes Kilroot Open Cycle Gas Turbine.
Under construction (1)— The following table listsEntered into an agreement to sell 26% interest in these businesses in November 2020.
(2)Entered into an agreement to sell our plants under constructionentire interest in the Eurasia SBU:Mong Duong 2 plant in December 2020.
Business Location Fuel Gross MW AES Equity Interest Expected Date of Commercial Operations
OPGC 2 (1)
 India Coal 1,320
 49% 1H 2019
AM Solar Jordan Solar 52
 36% 2H 2019
      1,372
   
_____________________________
(1)
Unconsolidated entity, accounted for as an equity affiliate.
In March 2018,December 2020, the Company completed the sale of its entire 51% ownership interest in Masinloc, a 630 MW coal-fired plant located in the Philippines. Prior to its sale, Masinloc was accounted for as a consolidated entity and its results were included in our operations as we had a controlling49% equity interest in the business.OPGC coal-fired generation facilities in India.



42 | 2021 Annual Report

The following map illustrates the location of our Eurasia facilities:
Eurasia Businesses
eurasiamap.jpgaes-20211231_g12.jpg
Bulgaria
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The electricity sector in Bulgaria allows both regulated and competitive segments. NEK, the state-owned electricity public supplier and energy trading company, acts as a single buyer and seller for all regulated transactions on the market. Electricity outside the regulated market trades on one of the platforms of the Independent Bulgarian Electricity Exchange day-ahead market, intra-day market or bilateral contracts market. Bulgaria is working with the European Commission on a model that will allow the gradual phase-out of regulated energy prices.
Bulgaria’s power sector is supported by a diverse generation mix, universal access to the grid, and numerous cross-border connections in neighboring countries. In addition, it plays an important role in the energy balance in the Balkan region.
Bulgaria has 12 GW of installed capacity enabling the country to meet and exceed domestic demand and export energy. Installed capacity is 37% coal-fired and 17% nuclear.Vietnam
Business DescriptionOur Maritza plantMong Duong 2 is a 6901,242 MW lignite fuel thermal power plant. Maritza's entire power output is contracted with NEKgross coal-fired plant located in the Quang Ninh Province of Vietnam and was constructed under a 15-year PPA,BOT service concession agreement expiring in May 2026. Since2040. This is the renegotiation of the PPAfirst coal-fired BOT plant using pulverized coal-fired boiler technology in April 2016, MaritzaVietnam. The BOT company has been collecting receivables from NEK in a timely manner. However, NEK's liquidity position remains subject to political conditions and regulatory changes in Bulgaria.
The DG Comp is reviewing NEK’s PPA with Maritza pursuantEVN and a Coal Supply Agreement with Vinacomin, both expiring in 2040.
On December 31, 2020, AES executed an agreement to the European Commission’s state aid rules. Maritza believes thatsell its PPA is legal and in compliance with all applicable laws. See Item 7. —Management's


Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsKey Trends and UncertaintiesRegulatory.
AES also owns an 89% economicentire 51% interest in the St. Nikola wind farm with 156 MW of installed capacity. Through December 31, 2018, the entire power output of the St. Nikola wind farm was contracted under a 15-year PPA with NEK. Starting January 1, 2019, the power output of St. Nikola is sold on the Independent Bulgarian Electricity Exchange and the plant receives additional revenue per the terms of an October 2018 Contract for Premium with the state-owned Electricity Security Fund.
Environmental Regulation — Best Available Techniques Reference Document for Large Combustion Plants (BREF LCP), the new EU environmental standards regulating emissions from the combustion of solid fuels for large combustion plants, was enacted in August 2017 and applies to Maritza. Impacted power plants are required to either meet the new standards or be granted a derogation by August 2021. Maritza requested such derogation from the Bulgarian environmental authorities in 2018, and expects to receive a response in 2019. If derogation is not received Maritza would seek to pass through the compliance costs to the off-taker pursuant to the PPA.
Key Financial Drivers Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
regulatory changes to the Bulgaria power market;
results of the DG Comp review;
the availability of the operating units;
the level of wind resources for St. Nikola;
spot market price volatility beyond the level of compensation through the Contract for Premium for St. Nikola; and
NEK's ability to meet the payment terms of the PPA contract.
United Kingdom
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — AES UK operates in the Integrated Single Electricity Market ("I-SEM") in Northern Ireland.Mong Duong 2 plant. The I-SEM is the wholesale electricity market arrangement operating in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland starting October 1, 2018, replacing the previously existing SEM. The I-SEM market arrangements are designed to integrate the Irish All Island electricity market with European electricity markets enabling the free flow of energy across borders, creating increased levels of competition and increased security of supply.
The Single Electricity Market Operator facilitates the continuous operation and administration of the I-SEM. The organization is managed as a contractual joint venture between EirGrid, the transmission system operator for the Republic of Ireland, and the System Operator for Northern Ireland. The Single Electricity Market Operator is licensed and regulated cooperatively by the Commission for Energy Regulation in the Republic of Ireland and the Northern Ireland Authority for Utility Regulation.
In addition, the I-SEM has a competitive capacity payment mechanism to ensure that sufficient generating capacity is offered to the market. The first competitive capacity auction for the capacity year May 2018 to September 2019 was completed in January 2018. The second capacity auction for the capacity year October 2019 to September 2020 was completed on February 1, 2019.
Since the introduction of I-SEM in October 2018, new instruments such as day-ahead, intra-day and balancing markets were introduced to reflect integration with EU energy markets. The system support services market was also reformed in May 2018 through the introduction of DS3, a competitive services market where participants are required to complete a separate qualification process.
Northern Ireland's power sector is supported by a diverse generation mix, a stable regulatory environment, universal access to the grid, and connections between the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland and the remainder of the UK. Installed capacity in the I-SEM is 41% gas fired and 38% from renewable sources, resulting in sensitivity to gas prices relative to order of merit. I-SEM has also set a target of 40% renewable generation by 2020.
Business Description — AES has two generation plants in the UK, Kilroot and Ballylumford, both of which are located in Northern Ireland within the Greater Belfast region.
Kilroot is a 701 MW coal-fired merchant plant, with an additional 10 MW of energy storage, that bids into the I-SEM. Kilroot's coal fired units failed to clear in the first I-SEM capacity auction process finalized in January 2018. Consequently, AES announced its intent to shut down the coal units, pending the results of an assessment by the


regulator to determine the long term needs of the Northern Ireland power grid. In November 2018, Kilroot's Unit 1 was awarded the 12 month System Support Service Agreement for the period October 2018 to September 2019. In addition, the Company also decided to transfer the capacity contract awarded to Ballylumford Unit 4 to Kilroot Unit 2. As a result, the decision to shut down both Kilroot coal units was reversed.
Ballylumford is a 708 MW gas-fired plant, of which 592 MW is contracted under a PPA with Power NI Power Procurement Business expiring in 2023. The 116 MW remaining capacity is bid into the I-SEM market. Ballylumford's B station Unit 5 failed to clear the aforementioned I-SEM capacity auction while Unit 4’s capacity contract was transferred to Kilroot. As a result, AES stopped generation at Ballylumford's B station in late 2018, and ongoing work to safely shut down the stationsale is expected to be completedclose in in early 2019.2023, subject to customary approval from the Government of Vietnam.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
regulatory changes to, the market structureoperating performance and payment mechanisms;
investments to maintain compliance with EU environmental legislation;
weather conditions impacting availability of growing renewables generation;
availability of the operating units and trading strategy;
commodity and FX prices (gas, coal, CO2) and sufficient market liquidity to hedge prices in the short-term; and
electricity demand in the I-SEM (including impact of wind generation).
Jordan
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure facility.— The Jordan electricity transmission market is a single-buyer model with the state owned NEPCO responsible for transmission. NEPCO generally enters into long-term power purchase agreements with IPP's to fulfill energy procurement requests from distribution utilities. The sector is prioritizing renewable energy development, with 2,200 MW of renewable energy installed capacity expected by 2020, 940 MW of which is already connected to the grid.
Business Description — In Jordan, AES has a 37% controlling interest in Amman East, a 381 MW oil/gas-fired plant fully contracted with the national utility under a 25-year PPA expiring in 2033, and a 36% controlling interest in the IPP4 plant, a 250 MW oil/gas-fired peaker plant, fully contracted with the national utility until 2039. We consolidate the results in our operations as we have controlling interest in these businesses.
Construction and Development AES, in conjunction with Mitsui & Co of Japan and NEBRAS Power of Qatar, have signed an agreement to construct a 52 MW solar project in Jordan. The plant is currently under construction, and is expected to be completed by mid 2019 to coincide with the start of a PPA to provide energy to NEPCO through 2038.
India
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The power sector is comprised of state and central government-owned and privately-owned generation and distribution utilities. Electricity is sold to state utilities mostly under long-term PPAs and about 10% of electricity is sold in the short-term market, for example, traded on an energy exchange or through competitively bid bilateral contracts. The tariffs are fixed on yearly basis by the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Central / State(s) for the long-term PPAs or determined through a competitive bidding process. OERC regulates the electricity purchase process for the distribution licensees, including the price at which the electricity from generating companies shall be procured for supply within the state of Orissa. OERC also facilitates intrastate transmission and wheeling of electricity. The electricity regulatory commissions are guided by the Electricity Act, National Electricity Policy, National Electricity Plan and Tariff Policy issued by the Government of India.
The power sector in India is composed of coal, gas, hydroelectric, renewable and nuclear energy. Total installed capacity as of December 31, 2018 was 349 GW, of which 64% is thermal generation. Renewable energy is adding capacity at a rapid pace and currently represents 21% of the total installed capacity. The remaining capacity is nuclear (2%) and hydro (13%).
Business Description — OPGC is a 420 MW coal-fired generation facility located in the state of Odisha. OPGC has a 30-year PPA with GRIDCO Limited, a state utility, expiring in 2026. OPGC is an unconsolidated entity and results are reported as Net equity in earnings of affiliates on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Construction and Development — AES has one 1,320 MW coal-fired project under construction, which is expected to begin operations in the first half of 2019. As of December 31, 2018, total capitalized costs at the project level were $1.3 billion. Once becoming operational, 75% of the expansion installed capacity is contracted with GRIDCO for a period of four years through 2023 and 100% for the next 25 years through 2048. A separate trading agreement is being negotiated for the remaining 25% of capacity to be sold in the trading market by GRIDCO on behalf of OPGC during the first four years following commencement of operations.
Environmental Regulation — The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change in India amended the Environment (Protection) Rules with stricter emission limits for thermal power plants through their notification issued in December 2015. All existing plants installed before December 31, 2003 are required to meet revised emission limits within two years and any new thermal power plants that will be operational from January 1, 2017 onwards are required to operate within the revised emission limits. As a result of this amendment, Selective Catalytic Rectifier and Flue Gas Desulphurisation systems are to be installed in the existing OPGC units to comply with the new NOX and SO2 emissions limits. The hardware to be installed to meet the tightened emission requirements will require substantial investment by OPGC. We believe the cost of complying with the new environmental regulations for particulate matters, water consumption, SOx and NOx limits will be a pass-through in the OERC prescribed tariff regulations for both the existing and expansion units.
Key Financial Drivers — Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
operating performance of the facility;
regulatory and environmental policy changes;
tariff determination by the OERC; and
PPA provisions and energy trading.
Vietnam
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Ministry of Industry and Trade in Vietnam is primarily responsible for formulating a program to restructure the power industry, developing the electricity market, and promulgating electricity market regulations. The fuel supply is owned by the government through Vinacomin, a state-owned entity, and Petro Vietnam.PetroVietnam.
The Vietnam power market is divided into three regions (North, Central, and South), with total installed capacity of approximately 4775 GW. The fuel mix in Vietnam is composed primarily of coal (32%), hydropower at 42%(29%) and coal at 37%renewables, including solar and wind (27%). EVN, the national utility, owns 60%39% of installed generation capacity.
The government is in the process of realigning EVN-owned companies into three different independent operations in order to create a competitive power market. A competitive electricity market has already been established. A pilot competitive wholesale electricity marketThe first stage of this realignment was the implementation of the Competitive Electricity Market, which has been developed,in operation since 2012. The second stage was the introduction of the Electricity Wholesale Market, which has been in operation since the beginning of 2019. The third and will be implemented overfinal stage impacts the next five years. The retail marketElectricity Retail Market, which will undergo similar reforms after 2022. BOT power


43 | 2021 Annual Report

plants will not directly participate in the power market; however,alternatively, a single buyer will bid the tariff on the power pool on their dispatchbehalf.
Development Strategy — In Vietnam, we continue to advance the development of our Son My LNG terminal project, which has a design capacity of up to 9.6 million metric tonnes per annum, and the Son My 2 CCGT project, which has a capacity of about 2,250 MW. In October 2019, we received formal approval as a government-mandated investor in the Son My LNG terminal project in partnership with PetroVietnam Gas and in September 2021, we signed the joint venture agreement with PetroVietnam Gas. In September 2019, we received formal approval as the government-mandated investor with 100% equity ownership in the Son My 2 CCGT project and executed a statutory memorandum of understanding with Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade in November 2019 to continue developing the Son My 2 CCGT project under Vietnam’s Build-Operate-Transfer legal framework. The Son My 2 CCGT project will utilize the Son My LNG terminal project and be impacted by the merit orderits anchor customer.
Bulgaria
Business DescriptionMong Duong IIOur AES Maritza plant is a 1,242690 MW gross coal-fired plant located in Quang Ninh Province of Vietnamlignite fuel thermal power plant. AES Maritza's entire power output is contracted with NEK, the state-owned public electricity supplier, independent energy producer, and was constructedtrading company. Maritza is contracted under a BOT service concession agreement expiring15-year PPA that expires in 2040. ThisMay 2026. AES Maritza has been collecting receivables from NEK in a timely manner since 2016. However, NEK's liquidity position remains subject to political conditions and regulatory changes in Bulgaria.
The DG Comp is the first and largest coal-fired BOT plant using pulverized coal-fired boiler technology in Vietnam. The BOT company has areviewing NEK’s PPA with EVNAES Maritza pursuant to the European Union’s state aid rules. AES Maritza believes that its PPA is legal and a Coal Supply Agreementin compliance with Vinacomin both expiringall applicable laws. For additional details see Key Trends and Uncertainties in 2040.Item 7.— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Form 10-K.
AES also owns an 89% economic interest in the St. Nikola wind farm with 156 MW of installed capacity. The power output of St. Nikola is sold to customers operating on the liberalized electricity market and the plant receives additional revenue per the terms of an October 2018 Contract for Premium with the state-owned Electricity Security Fund.
Key Financial Drivers Financial results are driven by many factors, including, but not limited to:
regulatory changes in the Bulgarian power market;
results of the DG Comp review;
availability and load factor of the operating units;
the level of wind resources for St. Nikola;
spot market price volatility beyond the level of compensation through the Contract for Premium for St. Nikola; and
NEK's ability to meet the payment terms of the PPA contract with Maritza.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The electricity sector in Bulgaria allows both regulated and competitive segments. In its capacity as the public provider of electricity, NEK acts as a single buyer and seller for all regulated transactions on the market. Electricity outside the regulated market trades on one of the platforms of the Independent Bulgarian Electricity Exchange day-ahead market, intra-day market, or bilateral contracts market. Bulgaria is working with the European Commission on the implementation of a model that allows for a gradual phase-out of regulated energy prices.
Bulgaria’s power sector is supported by a diverse generation mix, universal access to the grid, and numerous cross-border connections with neighboring countries. In addition, it plays an important role in the energy balance in the Balkan region.
Bulgaria has 13 GW of installed capacity enabling the country to meet and exceed domestic demand and export energy. Installed capacity is primarily thermal (45%), hydro (25%), and nuclear (16%).
Environmental Regulation — In 2017, new EU environmental standards were enacted that regulate emissions from the combustion of solid fuels for large combustion plants, known as the Best Available Techniques Reference Document for Large Combustion Plants, which applies to AES Maritza. AES Maritza was granted a derogation with respect to some requirements of these standards. Formal decision for the preliminary execution of that derogation was made by the Bulgarian environmental authorities in February 2021 and is in full force and effect.


44 | 2021 Annual Report

In July 2020, the EU approved the Next Generation EU ("NGEU") recovery instrument, which aims at mitigating the economic and social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and making European economies and societies more sustainable. The main funding component of NGEU is the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility ("RRF"). In October 2021, Bulgaria submitted its Recovery and Resilience Plan ("RRP") to the European Commission to describe the reforms and investments which Bulgaria wishes to make with the support of the RRF. In its RRP, Bulgaria proposes a coal phase-out plan aiming at retiring coal-fired power plants by 2038. Such coal phase-out plan is subject to negotiation with the European Commission, and subsequent approval by the Bulgarian Parliament.
To date, there are no EU or Bulgarian regulations that limit the ability of AES Maritza to operate.
Jordan
Business Description — In Jordan, AES has a 37% controlling interest in Amman East, a 381 MW oil/gas-fired plant fully contracted with the national utility under a 25-year PPA expiring in 2033, a 36% controlling interest in the IPP4 plant, a 250 MW oil/gas-fired peaker plant fully contracted with the national utility until 2039, and a 36% controlling interest in a 52 MW solar plant fully contracted with the national utility under a 20-year PPA expiring in 2039. We consolidate the results in our operations as we have a controlling interest in these businesses.
On November 10, 2020, AES executed a sale and purchase agreement to sell approximately 26% effective ownership interest in both the Amman East and IPP4 plants. The sale is expected to close in the first half of 2022 subject to customary approvals, including lender consents.
Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The Jordan electricity transmission market is a single-buyer model with the state-owned National Electric Power Company ("NEPCO") responsible for transmission. NEPCO generally enters into long-term PPAs with IPPs to fulfill energy procurement requests from distribution utilities. The sector is prioritizing renewable energy development, with 2,400 MW of renewable energy installed capacity expected by the end of 2021, 2,063 MW of which is already connected to the grid.
India
Development Strategy India is a high-growth market for renewables and battery energy storage. AES is supplying Maverick, a 5B technology, to solar developers and C&I customers for their solar projects in India. Maverick is a foldable, modular, rapidly deployable solar solution that can save land and manpower, and is competitive in the solar market. AES plans to work with a local partner to assemble this product in India and scale up production for the local market in support of the decarbonization mission of India.
AES owns and operates a 10 MW BESS unit in Delhi city, located inside a substation of Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited ("TPDDL"). The BESS is integrated with the TPDDL distribution system and provides frequency regulation and peak shifting services.



45 | 2021 Annual Report

aes-20211231_g13.jpg
Other Investments
Fluence and Uplight are unconsolidated entities and their results are reported as Net equity in earnings of affiliates on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. 5B is a cost method investment and AES will record income only when it receives dividends from 5B.
Fluence
Business Description — Fluence, created in 2018 as a joint venture by AES and Siemens, is a global energy storage technology and services company aligned with the AES strategy of becoming less carbon intensive. Fluence represents the combination of two global leaders in utility-scale, battery-based energy storage, bringing together the AES Advancion and Siemens Siestorage platforms, the capabilities and expertise of the two partners, and the global sales presence of Siemens.
In July 2021, the QIA invested $125 million in Fluence, as a result of which the ownership interest of AES and Siemens were each reduced to 43.2%. On November 1, 2021, Fluence Energy, Inc. completed its IPO, generating proceeds of approximately $936 million, after expenses, and is listed on NASDAQ under the symbol "FLNC". AES owns Class B-1 common stock, entitling AES to five votes per share held, and continues to hold its economic interest in the operating subsidiary of Fluence Energy, Inc. Upon the IPO, AES' economic interest was reduced from 43.2% to 34.2%. The Company continues to account for Fluence as an equity method investment.
Key Financial Drivers — Fluence's financial results are driven by the growth in its product revenue and an efficient cost structure that is expected to benefit from increased scale. Fluence’s pipeline of potential projects is global, with nearly half of the pipeline being located outside the U.S.


46 | 2021 Annual Report

Regulatory Framework and Market Structure — The grid-connected energy storage sector is expanding rapidly. By incorporating energy storage across the electric power network, utilities and communities around the world will optimize their infrastructure investments, increase network flexibility and resiliency, and accelerate cost-effective integration of renewable electricity generation. According to the BloombergNEF Global Energy Storage Outlook published in November 2021, global annual energy storage capacity installations, excluding residential, grew from 0.6 GW a year in 2015 to 4.2 GW a year in 2020 and are expected to grow to 52.2 GW a year by 2030. Additional growth opportunities exist in the provision of operational and maintenance services associated with energy storage products, as well as the provision of digital applications and solutions to improve performance and availabilityeconomic output. Fluence is positioned to be a leading participant in this growth, with 1 GW of energy storage assets deployed and 3.2 GW of contracted backlog, with a gross global pipeline of 13.9 GW as of December 31, 2021.
Uplight
Business Description — The Company holds an equity interest in Uplight as part of its digitization and growth strategy. Uplight offers a comprehensive digital platform for utility customer engagement. Uplight provides software and services to approximately 70 of the facility.world’s leading electric and gas utilities, principally in the U.S., with the mission of motivating and enabling energy users and providers to transition to a clean energy ecosystem. Uplight's solutions form a unified, end-to-end customer energy experience system that delivers innovative energy efficiency, demand response, and clean energy solutions quickly. Utility and energy company leaders rely on Uplight and its customer-focused digital energy experiences to improve customer satisfaction, reduce service costs, increase revenue, and reduce carbon emissions.
In 2021, the Company invested a further $60 million in Uplight. However, due to investments in Uplight by other investors, AES' ownership interest decreased from 32.3% to 29.4%. As the Company does not control Uplight after the additional investment, it continues to be accounted for as an equity method investment and is reported as part of Corporate and Other.
Key Financial Drivers — Uplight's financial results are driven by the rate of growth of new customers and the extension of additional services to existing customers. Revenue growth primarily drives its financial results, given the relative significance of fixed operating costs.
Development Strategy — AES' collaboration with Uplight is designed to create value for Uplight, AES, and their respective customers. AES Indiana and AES Ohio have implemented Uplight's consumer engagement solutions in support of energy efficiency and demand response programs, as well as piloted new solutions with Uplight. AES and Uplight are now working together to develop mobile-enabled engagement, e-mobility, and advanced consumer and industrial offerings, with plans for future deployment of the Uplight platform in Latin America and continued innovative product development.
5B
Business Description — The Company made a strategic investment in 5B, a solar technology innovator with the mission to accelerate the transformation of the world to a clean energy future. 5B's technology design enables solar projects to be installed up to three times faster, while allowing for up to two times more energy within the same footprint and can sustain higher wind speeds than traditional solar plants.
Key Financial Drivers — 5B is a cost method investment and AES will record income only when it receives dividends from 5B. 5B is at the beginning of its growth and is expanding its ecosystem for global reach.
Development Strategy — In addition to a large global market for third party projects, we believe there is an addressable market of nearly 5 GW across our development pipeline. 5B achieved sales orders of 53 MW in 2021. AES expects to utilize this technology in conjunction with ongoing automation and digital initiatives to speed up delivery time and lower costs. 5B technology has been deployed at a 2 MW AES project in Panama, has technology on-site for installation in Chile, and is expected to be deployed across numerous markets in the AES portfolio.
Environmental and Land-Use Regulations
The Company faces certain risks and uncertainties related to numerous environmental laws and regulations, including existing and potential GHG legislation or regulations, and actual or potential laws and regulations pertaining to water discharges, waste management (including disposal of coal combustion residuals), and certain air emissions, such as SO2, NOX, PM,particulate matter, mercury, and other hazardous air pollutants. Such risks and


47 | 2021 Annual Report

uncertainties could result in increased capital expenditures or other compliance costs which could have a material adverse effect on certain of our U.S. or international subsidiaries, and our consolidated results of operations. For further information about these risks, see Item 1A.—Risk FactorsOur operations are subject to significant government regulation and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in the law or regulatory schemes; Several of our businesses are subject to potentially significant remediation expenses, enforcement initiatives, private party lawsuits and reputational risk associated with CCR; Our businesses are subject to stringent environmental laws, rules and regulations; and Concerns about GHG emissions and the


potential risks associated with climate change have led to increased regulation and other actions that could impact our businesses in this Form 10-K. For a discussion of the laws and regulations of individual countries within each SBU where our subsidiaries operate, see discussion within Item 1.—Business of this Form 10-K under the applicable SBUs.
Many of the countries in which the Company does business have laws and regulations relating to the siting, construction, permitting, ownership, operation, modification, repair and decommissioning of, and power sales from electric power generation or distribution assets. In addition, international projects funded by the International Finance Corporation, the private sector lending arm of the World Bank, or many other international lenders are subject to World Bank environmental standards or similar standards, which tend to be more stringent than local country standards. The Company often has used advanced generation technologies in order to minimize environmental impacts, such as combined fluidized bed boilers and advanced gas turbines, and environmental control devices such as flue gas desulphurization for SO2 emissions and selective catalytic reduction for NOx emissions.
Environmental laws and regulations affecting electric power generation and distribution facilities are complex, change frequently, and have become more stringent over time. The Company has incurred and will continue to incur capital costs and other expenditures to comply with these environmental laws and regulations. The Company may be required to make significant capital or other expenditures to comply with these regulations. There can be no assurance that the businesses operated by the subsidiaries of the Company will be able to recover any of these compliance costs from their counterparties or customers such that the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows would not be materially affected.
Various licenses, permits, and approvals are required for our operations. Failure to comply with permits or approvals, or with environmental laws, can result in fines, penalties, capital expenditures, interruptions, or changes to our operations. Certain subsidiaries of the Company are subject to litigation or regulatory action relating to environmental permits or approvals. See Item 3.Legal Proceedings in this Form 10-K for more detail with respect to environmental litigation and regulatory action.
United States Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations
In the United States, the CAA and various state laws and regulations regulate emissions of air pollutants, including SO2, NOX, PM,particulate matter, GHGs, mercury, and other hazardous air pollutants. Certain applicable rules are discussed in further detail below.
CSAPR — CSAPR addresses the "good neighbor" provision of the CAA, which prohibits sources within each state from emitting any air pollutant in an amount which will contribute significantly to any other state’s nonattainment of, or interference with maintenance of, any NAAQS. The CSAPR required significant reductions in SO2 and NOX emissions from power plants in many states in which subsidiaries of the Company operate. The Company is required to comply with the CSAPR in several states, including Ohio, Indiana, Oklahoma and Maryland. The CSAPR is implemented in part through a market-based program under which compliance may be achievable through the acquisition and use of emissions allowances created by the EPA. The Company complies with CSAPR through operation of existing controls and purchases of allowances on the open market, as needed.
On October 26, 2016, the EPA published a final rule to update the CSAPR to address the 2008 ozone NAAQS ("CSAPR Update Rule"). The CSAPR Update Rule finds that NOxX ozone season emissions in 22 states (including Indiana, Maryland, Ohio and Oklahoma)Ohio) affect the ability of downwind states to attain and maintain the 2008 ozone NAAQS, and, accordingly, the EPA issued federal implementation plans that both updated existing CSAPR NOxX ozone season emission budgets for electric generating units within these states and implemented these budgets through modifications to the CSAPR NOxX ozone season allowance trading program. Implementation started in the 2017 ozone season (May-September 2017). Affected facilities began to receive fewer ozone season NOxX allowances in 2017, resulting in the need to purchase additional allowances. Additionally, on September 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit remanded a portion of the CSAPR Update Rule to the EPA. On October 30, 2020, the EPA issued a proposed rule addressing 21 states’ (including Maryland and Indiana) outstanding “good neighbor” obligations with respect of the


48 | 2021 Annual Report

2008 ozone NAAQS. On April 30, 2021, the EPA published a final rule to address the 2020 D.C. Circuit decision. The EPA is issuing new or amended federal implementation plans for 12 states, including Indiana, Maryland, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, with revised CSAPR NOx ozone season emission budgets for electric generating units within these states via a new CSAPR NOx Ozone Season Group 3 Trading Program. Implementation began during the 2021 ozone season (May-September 2021) with an effective date of June 29, 2021. AES Indiana facilities and AES Warrior Run in Maryland will receive fewer ozone season NOx allowances for future NOx ozone seasons beginning in 2021 and later, possibly resulting in the need to purchase additional allowances. In addition, subject sources in these states were required to surrender an equivalent number of previously allocated 2021-2024 Group 2 allowances by deadlines in 2021. This requirement applies inclusive of assets and allowances that have since been sold and/or retired, including former AES assets in Ohio and Pennsylvania. While AES no longer operates electric generating units subject to the revised CSAPR Update Rule in Ohio or Pennsylvania, certain prior AES sources in these states were required to surrender an equivalent number of previously allocated 2021-2024 Group 2 allowances and on July 14, 2021 the required allowances were recalled by the EPA, fulfilling this obligation. While the Company's 2017 and 2018additional CSAPR compliance costs wereto date have been immaterial, the future availability of and cost to purchase allowances to meet the emission reduction requirements is uncertain at this time, but it could be material if certain facilities will need to purchase additional allowances based on reduced allocations.
New Source Review ("NSR") — The NSR requirements under the CAA impose certain requirements on major emission sources, such as electric generating stations, if changes are made to the sources that result in a significant increase in air emissions. Certain projects, including power plant modifications, are excluded from these NSR requirements if they meet the RMRRroutine maintenance, repair, and replacement ("RMRR") exclusion of the CAA. There is ongoing uncertainty and significant litigation regarding which projects fall within the RMRR exclusion. Over the past several years, the EPA has filed suits against coal-fired power plant owners and issued NOVs to a number of power plant owners alleging NSR violations. See Item 3.—Legal Proceedings in this Form 10-K for more detail with respect to environmental litigation


and regulatory action, including aan NOV issued by the EPA against IPLAES Indiana concerning NSR and prevention of significant deterioration issues under the CAA.
If NSR requirements wereare imposed on any of the power plants owned by the Company's subsidiaries, the results could have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Regional Haze Rule — The EPA's "Regional Haze Rule" is intended to reduce haze and protect visibility in designated federal areas, and sets guidelines for determining BARTthe best available retrofit technology ("BART") at affected plants and how to demonstrate "reasonable progress" toward eliminating man-made haze by 2064. The Regional Haze Rule required states to consider five factors when establishing BART for sources, including the availability of emission controls, the cost of the controls, and the effect of reducing emission on visibility in Class I areas (including wilderness areas, national parks, and similar areas). The statute would require compliance within five years after the EPA approves the relevant SIP or issues a federal implementation plan, although individual states may impose more stringent compliance schedules. In September 2017, the EPA published a final rule affirming the continued validity of the EPA's previous determination allowing states to rely on the CSAPR to satisfy BART requirements. All of the Company’s facilities that are subject to BART comply by meeting the requirements of CSAPR.
The second phase of the Regional Haze Rule beginsbegan in 2019. States mustwere required to submit regional haze plans for this second implementation period in 2021 to demonstrate reasonable progress towards reducing visibility impairment in Class I areas. States may need to require additional emissions controls for visibility impairing pollutants, including on BART sources, during the second implementation period. We currently cannot predict the impact of this second implementation period, if any, on any of our Company’s U.S. subsidiaries. To date, none of the states in which we operate have submitted plans identifying potential impacts to Company facilities.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards ("NAAQS")NAAQSUnder the CAA, the EPA sets NAAQS for six principal pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment, including ozone, particulate matter, NOxX, and SO2, which result from coal combustion. Areas meeting the NAAQS are designated "attainment areas" while those that do not meet the NAAQS are considered "nonattainment areas." Each state must develop a plan to bring nonattainment areas into compliance with the NAAQS, which may include imposing operating limits on individual plants. The EPA is required to review NAAQS at five-year intervals.
Based on the current and potential future ambient air standards, certain of the states in which the Company's subsidiaries operate have determined or will be required to determine whether certain areas within such states meet the NAAQS. Some of these states may be required to modify their State Implementation PlansSIPs to detail how the states will attain or maintain their attainment status. As part of this process, it is possible that the applicable state environmental


49 | 2021 Annual Report

regulatory agency or the EPA may require reductions of emissions from our generating stations to reach attainment status for ozone, fine particulate matter, NOxX, or SO2. The compliance costs of the Company's U.S. subsidiaries could be material.
Beginning January 1, 2017, IPL Petersburg has been requiredMercury and Air Toxics Standard — In April 2012, the EPA’s rule to meet reduced SOestablish maximum achievable control technology standards for hazardous air pollutants regulated under the CAA emitted from coal and oil-fired electric utilities, known as “MATS”, became effective and AES facilities implemented measures to comply, as applicable.2 limits established in
In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court remanded MATS to the D.C. Circuit due to the EPA’s failure to consider costs before deciding to regulate power plants under Section 112 of the CAA and subsequently remanded MATS to the EPA without vacatur. On May 22, 2020, the EPA published a final rule published by IDEM in 2015 in accordance with a new one-hour SO2 NAAQSfinding that it is not “appropriate and necessary” to regulate hazardous air pollutant emissions from coal- and oil-fired electric generating units (EGUs) (reversing its prior 2016 finding), but that the EPA would not remove the source category from the CAA Section 112(c) list of 75 parts per billion. Improvements tosource categories and would not change the existing FGD systems at IPL’s Petersburg station were required to meetMATS requirements. Several petitioners have filed for judicial review of the emission limits imposed by the rule. The IURC approved IPL’s request for NAAQS SO2 compliance at its Petersburg generation station with 80% of qualifying costs recovered through a rate adjustment mechanismfinal finding and the remainder recorded asD.C. Circuit, on February 16, 2021, granted the EPA's request that the rule be held in abeyance pending the EPA's review. On January 31, 2022, the EPA released a regulatory asset for recoverypre-publication proposed rule to revoke its May 2020 finding and reaffirm its 2016 finding that it is appropriate and necessary to regulate these emissions. Further rulemakings and/or proceedings are possible; however, in a subsequent rate case. The approved capital costthe meantime, MATS remains in effect. We currently cannot predict the outcome of the NAAQS SO2regulatory or judicial process, or its impact, if any, on our MATS compliance plan is approximately $29 million. On August 15, 2018, EPA proposed to approve Indiana’s State Implementation Plan addressing attainment of the 2010 SO2 standard for certain locations including those of IPL's Petersburg Generating Stations.planning or ultimate costs.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions — In January 2011, the EPA began regulating GHG emissions from certain stationary sources, including a pre-construction permitting program for certain new construction or major modifications, known as the PSD.Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("PSD"). If future modifications to our U.S.-based businesses' sources become subject to PSD for other pollutants, it may trigger GHG BACT requirements and the cost of compliance with such requirements may be material.
On October 23, 2015, the EPA's rule establishing NSPS for new electric generating units became effective, establishing CO2 emissions standards for newly constructed coal-fueled electric generating plants, which reflects the partial capture and storage of CO2 emissions from the plants. The EPA also promulgated NSPS applicable to modified and reconstructed electric generating units, which will serve as a floor for future BACT determinations for such units. The NSPS could have an impact on the Company's plans to construct and/or modify or reconstruct electric generating units in some locations. On December 20, 2018, the EPA published proposed revisions to the final NSPS for new, modified, and reconstructed coal-fired electric utility steam generating units proposing that the Best Systembest system of Emissions Reductionemissions reduction for these units is highly efficient generation that would be equivalent to supercritical


steam conditions for larger units and sub-critical steam conditions for smaller units, and not partial carbon capture and sequestration, as was finalized in the 2015 final NSPS.NSPS. The EPA did not include revisions for natural-gas combined cycle or simple cycle units in the December 20, 2018 proposal.
On December 22, 2015, In January 2021, the EPA finalized CO2 emission rulesissued a final rule determining when standards are appropriate for existing power plants under Clean Air Act Section 111(d) (called the CPP). The CPP providesGHG emissions from stationary source categories for interim emissions performance rates that must be achieved beginning in 2022 andnew source but did not take final emissions performance rates that must be achieved starting in 2030. The full impact of the CPP would dependaction on the following:
whether and how2018 proposal to revise the states in which the Company's U.S. businesses operate respond to the CPP;
whether the states adopt an emissions trading regime and, if so, which trading regime;
how other states respond to the CPP, which will affect the size and robustness of any emissions trading market; and
how other companies may respond in the face of increased carbon costs.
Several states and industry groups challenged the NSPS for CO2 in2015 final NSPS. On April 5, 2021, the D.C. Circuit. Pursuant to a court order issued in August 2017,Circuit vacated and remanded the litigation is being held in indefinite abeyance pending further court order.
In addition, on February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued orders staying implementation of the CPP pending resolution of challenges to thefinal January 2021 final rule. Challenges to both the CPP and the GHG NSPS are being held in abeyance at this time. On October 16, 2017, the EPA published in the Federal Register a proposed rule that would rescind the CPP. On December 28, 2017, the EPA published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to solicit comments as EPA considers a potential rule to establish emission guidelines to replace the CPP and limit GHG emissions from existing electric generating units under Section 111(d) of the CAA.
On August 31, 2018, the EPA published in the Federal Register proposed Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Electric Utility Generating Units, known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule. In addition,On July 8, 2019, the EPA proposedpublished the final ACE Rule along with associated revisions to implementing regulations and the New Source Review program.regulations. The proposedfinal ACE Rule would replaceestablished CO2 emission rules for existing power plants under CAA Section 111(d) and replaced the EPA’sEPA's 2015 Clean Power Plan and proposes to determineRule (CPP). In accordance with the ACE Rule, the EPA determined that heat rate improvement measures are the best system of emission reductionemissions reductions for existing coal-fired electric generating units. The final rule requires states, including Indiana and Maryland, develop a State Plan to establish CO2 emission limits for designated facilities, including AES Indiana Petersburg's and AES Warrior Run's coal-fired electric generating units. States have three years to develop their plans under the rule. On February 19, 2020, Indiana published a First Notice for the Indiana ACE Rule indicating that IDEM intends to determine the best system of emissions reductions and CO2 standards for affected units. Impacts remain largely uncertain because Indiana's State Plan has not yet been developed. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded to the EPA the ACE Rule, although the parties had an opportunity to request a rehearing at the D.C. Circuit or seek a review of the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. On March 5, 2021, the D.C. Circuit issued the partial mandate effectuating the vacatur of the ACE Rule. In effect, the CPP will not take effect while the EPA is addressing the remand of the ACE rule by promulgating a new Section 111(d) rule to regulate greenhouse gases from existing electric generating


50 | 2021 Annual Report

units. On October 29, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court granted petitions to review the decision by the D.C. Circuit to vacate the ACE Rule. The impact of the results of such litigation and potential future greenhouse gas emissions regulations remains uncertain, but it could be material.
On November 4, 2020, the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement became effective. However, on January 20, 2021, President Biden signed and submitted an instrument for the U.S. to rejoin the Paris Agreement effective February 19, 2021. In addition, in November 2021, the international community gathered in Glasgow at the 26th Conference to the Parties on the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change ("COP26"), during which multiple announcements were made, including a call for parties to eliminate certain fossil fuel subsidies and pursue further action on non-carbon dioxide GHGs. As such, there is some uncertainty with respect to the impact of GHG rules on AES Indiana. The GHG BACT requirements will not apply at least until we construct a new major source or make a major modification of an existing major source, and the NSPS will not require us to comply with an emissions standard until we construct a new electric generating unit. We do not have any planned major modifications of an existing source or plans to construct a new major source at this time which are expected to be subject to these regulations. Furthermore, the EPA, states, and other utilities are still evaluating potential impacts of the GHG regulations in our industry. In light of these uncertainties, we cannot predict the impact of the EPA’s current and future GHG regulations on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.
Due to the future uncertainty of the CPP or potential replacement rule,these regulations and associated litigation, we cannot at this time determine the impact on our operations or consolidated financial results, but we believe the cost to comply with the CPP,ACE Rule, should it be upheld and implemented in its current or a substantially similar form, could be material. The GHG NSPS remains in effect at this time, and, absent further action from the EPA that rescinds or substantively revises the NSPS, it could impact any Company plans to construct and/or modify or reconstruct electric generating units in some locations, which may have a material impact on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Cooling Water Intake — The Company's facilities are subject to a variety of rules governing water use and discharge. In particular, the Company's U.S. facilities are subject to the CWA Section 316(b) rule issued by the EPA that seeks to protect fish and other aquatic organisms by requiring existing steam electric generating facilities to utilize the BTAbest technology available ("BTA") for cooling water intake structures. On August 15, 2014, the EPA published its final standards to protect fish and other aquatic organisms drawn into cooling water systems at large power plants. These standardsbased on CWA Section 316(b) which require certain subject facilities to choose among seven BTA options to reduce fish impingement. In addition, certain facilities that withdraw at least 125 million gallons per day for cooling purposes must conduct studies to assist permitting authorities to determine whichwhether and what site-specific controls, if any, are required to reduce entrainment.entrainment of aquatic organisms. It is possible that this decision-making process, which includes permitting and public input, could result in the need to install closed-cycle cooling systems (closed-cycle cooling towers), or other technology. Finally, the standards require that new units added to an existing facility to increase generation capacity are required to reduce both impingement and entrainment. It is not yet possible to predict the total impacts of this recent final rule at this time, including any challenges to such final rule and the outcome of any such challenges. However, if additional capital expenditures are necessary, they could be material.
AES Southland's current plan is to comply with the SWRCB OTC Policy by shutting down and permanently retiring all existing generating units at AES Alamitos, AES Huntington Beach, and AES Redondo Beach that utilize OTC by December 31, 2020, the compliance datedates included in the OTC Policy. New air-cooled combined cycle gas turbine generators and battery energy storage systems will be constructed at the AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach generating stations, and there is currently no plan to replace the OTC generating units at the AES Redondo Beach generating station. The execution of the implementation plan for compliance with the SWRCB's OTC Policy is entirely dependent on the Company's ability to execute on long-term power purchase agreements to support project financing of the replacement generating units at AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach. The SWRCB is currently reviewingreviews the implementation plan and latest information on OTC generating unit retirement dates and


new generation availability to evaluate the impact on electrical system reliability which could result in the extension ofand OTC compliance dates for specific units.
The Company’s California subsidiaries have signed 20-year term power purchase agreementsPPAs with Southern California Edison for the new generating capacity, which have been approved by the California Public Utilities Commission. Construction of new generating capacity began in June 2017 at AES Huntington Beach and July 2017 at AES Alamitos. ConstructionThe new air-cooled combined cycle gas turbine generators and battery energy storage systems were constructed at both sitesthe AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach generating stations. The new air-cooled combined cycle gas turbine generators at the AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach generating stations began commercial operation in early 2020 and there is on schedule and will requirecurrently no plan to replace the OTC generating units at the AES Redondo Beach generating station following existingthe retirement. Certain OTC units were required to retire earlier than December 31, 2020be retired in 2019 to provide interconnection capacity and/or emissions credits prior to startup of the new generating units:
Redondo Beach Unit 7 - September 30, 2019
Huntington Beach Unit 1 - December 31, 2019
Alamitos Units 1, 2,units, and 6 - December 31, 2019
Thethe remaining AES OTC generating units in California will be shutdown and permanently retired by the OTC Policy compliance dates for these units. The SWRCB OTC Policy required the shutdown and permanent retirement of all remaining OTC generating units at AES Alamitos, AES Huntington Beach, and AES Redondo Beach by December 31, 2020. The initial amendment extended the deadline for shutdown and retirement of AES Alamitos and AES Huntington Beach’s remaining OTC generating units to December 31, 2023 and extended the deadline for shutdown and


51 | 2021 Annual Report

retirement of AES Redondo Beach’s remaining OTC generating units to December 31, 2021 (the “AES Redondo Beach Extension”). In October 2020, the cities of Redondo Beach and Hermosa Beach filed a state court lawsuit challenging the AES Redondo Beach Extension. AES opposed the action and the court granted an order dismissing the matter. Plaintiffs have initiated an additional challenge to the permit, and the outcome of that lawsuit is unclear. On March 16, 2021 the SACCWIS released their draft 2021 report to SWRCB. The report summarizes the State of California’s current electrical grid reliability needs and recommended a two-year extension to the compliance schedule for AES Redondo Beach to address system-wide grid reliability needs. The SWRCB public hearing regarding the final decision on the amendment of the OTC policy was held on October 19, 2021 and the Board voted in favor of extending the compliance date for AES Redondo Beach to December 31, 2023. The AES Redondo Beach NPDES permit has been administratively extended.
Power plants are required to comply with the more stringent of state or federal requirements. At present, the California state requirements are more stringent and have earlier compliance dates than the federal EPA requirements, and are therefore applicable to the Company's California assets.
Challenges to the federal EPA's rule were filed and consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, although implementation of the rule was not stayed while the challenges proceeded. On July 23, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the rule. The Second Circuit later denied a petition by environmental groups for rehearing. The Company anticipates that compliance with CWA Section 316(b) regulations and associated costs could have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Water Discharges — OnIn June 29, 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("the agencies") published a final rule defining federal jurisdiction over waters of the United States.U.S., known as the "Waters of the U.S." (WOTUS) rule. This rule, which initially became effective onin August 28, 2015, maycould expand or otherwise change the number and types of waters or features subject to federalCWA permitting. However, after repealing the 2015 WOTUS rule on October 22, 2019, the agencies, on April 21, 2020, issued the final “Navigable Waters Protection” (NWP) rule which again revised the definition of waters of the U.S. On June 27, 2017,August 30, 2021, the EPAU.S. District Court for the District of Arizona issued an order vacating and remanding the NWP Rule. This vacatur of the NWP Rule applies nationwide. As such, the agencies are interpreting waters of the U.S. consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime until further notice. On December 7, 2021, the agencies published a proposed rule to define the scope of waters regulated under the CWA. The proposed rule would restore regulations defining WOTUS that were in place prior to 2015, with updates to be consistent with relevant Supreme Court decisions. A second rulemaking process is planned to further build upon this proposed rule. On January 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari on a rule that would rescindwetlands case (Sackett v. EPA) on the “Waterslimited question of: “Whether the Ninth Circuit set forth the proper test for determining whether wetlands are ‘waters of the United States” rule and re-codifyStates’ under the definition of “WatersClean Water Act.” The Ninth Circuit employed Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test from the 2006 Rapanos v. United States decision; the plurality opinion in Rapanos required a water body to have a "continuous surface connection" with a water of the United States” that existed priorStates in order to be considered a wetland covered by the 2015 rule. However,CWA. In Sackett v. EPA, the Court may finally provide clarity on February 6, 2018,which test from the EPA published a final2006 Rapanos decision controls. It is too early to determine whether the newly promulgated NWP rule to delay the original effective date of the 2015 “Waters of the United States” to February 6, 2020, which allows the EPA to create a new rule in the interim period without the 2015 rule taking effect. On June 29, 2018, the agencies signed a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking clarifying that the proposal is to permanently repeal the 2015 Rule. We cannot predict theor any outcome of the judicial challenges to the rule or the regulatory process to rescind the rule, but if the “Waters of the United Sates” rule is ultimately implemented in its current or substantially similar form and survives legal challenges, it couldlitigation may have a material impact on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. On February 14, 2019, the agencies published a proposed rule to revise the definition of the “Waters of the United States.” We are reviewing the December 11, 2018 proposed rule and it is too early to determine whether this might have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Certain of the Company's U.S.-based businesses are subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that regulate specific industrial waste water and storm water discharges to the waters of the United States under the CWA.
On August 28, 2012, the IDEM issued NPDES permits that set new water quality-based effluent discharge limits for the IPL Harding Street and Petersburg facilities with full compliance ultimately required by September 29, 2017. The deadline for Petersburg to commission a portion of the treatment system was subsequently extended to April 11, 2018.
On November 3, 2015, the EPA published its final ELG rule to reduce toxic pollutants discharged into waters of the U.S. by steam-electric power plants.plants through technology applications. These effluent limitations for existing and new sources include dry handling of fly ash, closed-loop or dry handling of bottom ash, and more stringent effluent limitations for flue gas de-sulfurizationdesulfurization wastewater. The required compliance time lines for existing sources was to be established between November 1, 2018 and December 31, 2023. On September 18, 2017, the EPA published a final rule delaying certain compliance dates of the ELG rule for two years while it administratively reconsiders the rule. IPLAES Indiana Petersburg has installed a dry bottom ash handling system in response to the CCR rule described below and wastewater treatment systems in response to the NPDES permits described above in advance of the ELG compliance date. As a resultOther U.S. businesses already include dry handling of the decision to retire Stuartfly ash and Killen generating stations, webottom ash and do not expectgenerate flue gas desulfurization wastewater. However, it is too early to determine whether any outcome of litigation or current or future revisions to the ELG rule tomight have a material impact on these two stations. While weour business, financial condition, and results of operations.
On April 23, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in the Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui case related to whether a CWA permit is required when pollutants originate from a point source but are still evaluatingconveyed to navigable waters through a nonpoint source, such as groundwater. The Court held that discharges to groundwater require a permit if the effectsaddition of the rule on our other U.S. businesses, we anticipate


thatpollutants through groundwater is the implementationfunctional equivalent of its current requirements coulda direct discharge from the point source into navigable waters. A number of legal cases relevant to determination of "functional equivalent" are ongoing in various jurisdictions. It is too early to determine whether the Supreme Court decision or the result of litigation to "functional equivalent" may have a material adverse effectimpact on our business, financial condition, or results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and a postponement or reconsideration of the rule that leads to less stringent requirements would likely offset some or all of the adverse effects of the rule.operations.


52 | 2021 Annual Report

Selenium Rule In June 2016, the EPA published the final national chronic aquatic life criterion for the pollutant Seleniumselenium in fresh water. NPDES permits may be updated to include Seleniumselenium water quality basedquality-based effluent limits based on a site-specific evaluation process, which includes determining if there is a reasonable potential to exceed the revised final Seleniumselenium water quality standards for the specific receiving water body utilizing actual and/or project discharge information for the generating facilities. As a result, it is not yet possible to predict the total impacts of this final rule at this time, including any challenges to such final rule and the outcome of any such challenges. However, if additional capital expenditures are necessary, they could be material. IPLAES Indiana would seek recovery of these capital expenditures; however, there is no guarantee it would be successful in this regard.
Waste Management — In the course of operations, the Company's facilities generate solid and liquid waste materials requiring eventual disposal or processing. With the exception of coal combustion residuals ("CCR"), the wastes are not usually physically disposed of on our property, but are shipped off site for final disposal, treatment or recycling. CCR, which consists of bottom ash, fly ash and air pollution control wastes, is disposed of at some of our coal-fired power generation plant sites using engineered, permitted landfills. Waste materials generated at our electric power and distribution facilities may include asbestos, CCR, oil, scrap metal, rubbish, small quantities of industrial hazardous wastes such as spent solvents, tree and land clearing wastes and polychlorinated biphenyl contaminated liquids and solids. The Company endeavors to ensure that all of its solid and liquid wastes are disposed of in accordance with applicable national, regional, state and local regulations. On October 19, 2015, an EPA rule regulating CCR under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act as nonhazardous solid waste became effective. The rule established nationally applicable minimum criteria for the disposal of CCR in new and currently operating landfills and surface impoundments, including location restrictions, design and operating criteria, groundwater monitoring, corrective action and closure requirements, and post-closure care. The primary enforcement mechanisms under this regulation would be actions commenced by the states and private lawsuits. On December 16, 2016, the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act ("WIN Act") was signed into law. This includes provisions to implement the CCR rule through a state permitting program, or if the state chooses not to participate, a possible federal permit program. If this rule is finalized before Indiana or Puerto Rico establishes a state-level CCR permit program, AES CCR units in those locations could eventually be required to apply for a federal CCR permit from the EPA. The EPA has indicated that it will implement a phased approach to amending the CCR Rule, which is ongoing. On August 28, 2020, the EPA published final amendments to the CCR Rule titled "A Holistic Approach to Closure Part A: Deadline to Initiate Closure," that, among other amendments, required certain CCR units to cease waste receipt and initiate closure by April 11, 2021. The CCR Part A Rule also allowed for extensions of the April 11, 2021 deadline if the EPA determines certain criteria are met. Facilities seeking such an extension were required to submit a demonstration to the EPA by November 30, 2020. On January 25, 2022, the EPA released proposed determinations regarding nine CCR Part A Rule demonstrations. On the same day, the EPA issued four compliance-related letters notifying certain other facilities of their compliance obligations under the federal CCR regulations. The determinations and letters include interpretations regarding implementation of the CCR Rule. It is too early to determine whetherthe direct or indirect impact of these letters or any determinations that may be made.
The CCR rule, current or proposed amendments to the CCR rule, the results of the groundwater monitoring data, or the outcome of CCRCCR-related litigation or a potential CCR Remand Rule maycould have a material impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. AES Indiana would seek recovery of any resulting expenditures; however, there is no guarantee we would be successful in this regard.
On January 2, 2020, Puerto Rico Senate Bill 1221 was signed by the Puerto Rico Governor into law and became effective as Act 5-2020. Act 5-2020 prohibits the disposal and unencapsulated beneficial use of CCR and places restrictions on storage of CCR in Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources developed implementation regulations which became effective on June 10, 2021. Prior to Act 5-2020's approval, the Company had put in place arrangements to dispose or beneficially use its coal ash and combustion residual outside of Puerto Rico. It is too early to determine whether this might have a material impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. 
Biden Administration Actions Affecting Environmental RegulationsOn January 20, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order ("EO") titled “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis” directing agencies to, among other tasks, review regulations issued under the prior administration to determine whether they should be suspended, revoked, or revised. As provided for by the EO, the EPA submitted a letter to the DOJ seeking to obtain abeyances or stays of proceedings in pending litigation that seeks review of regulations promulgated during the Trump Administration. The Biden Administration also issued a Memorandum titled “Regulatory Freeze Pending Review” directing agencies to refrain from proposing or issuing any rules until the Biden Administration has reviewed and approved those rules. These actions may have an impact on regulations that may affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
The existing ash ponds at the Petersburg Station did not meet certain structural stability requirements set forth in the CCR rule. As such, the Company was ultimately required to cease use of all ash ponds at Petersburg by November 11, 2018.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980This act, also know as "Superfund," may be the source of claims against certain of the Company's U.S. subsidiaries from time to time. There is ongoing litigation at a site known as the South Dayton Landfill where a group of companies already recognized as potentially responsible parties have sued DP&L and other unrelated entities seeking a contribution toward the costs of assessment and remediation. DP&L is actively opposing such claims. In 2003, DP&L received notice that the EPA considers DP&L to be a potentially responsible party at the Tremont City landfill Superfund site. The EPA has taken no further action with respect to DP&L since 2003 regarding the Tremont City landfill. The Company is unable to determine whether there will be any liability, or the size of any liability that may ultimately be assessed against DP&L at these two sites, but any such liability could be material to DP&L.
International Environmental Regulations
For a discussion of the material environmental regulations applicable to the Company's businesses located outside of the U.S., see Environmental Regulation under the discussion of the various countries in which the Company's subsidiaries operate in Item 1.—Business—Our Organization and SegmentsBusiness, above.under the applicable SBUs.


53 | 2021 Annual Report

Customers
We sell to a wide variety of customers. No individual customer accounted for 10% or more of our 20182021 total revenue. In our generation business, we own and/or operate power plants to generate and sell power to wholesale customers such as utilities and other intermediaries. Our utilities sell to end-user customers in the residential, commercial, industrial, and governmental sectors in a defined service area.
Human Capital Management
At AES, our people are instrumental to helping us meet the world’s energy needs. Supporting our people is a foundational value for AES. All of our actions are grounded in the shared values that shape AES’ culture: Safety First, Highest Standards, and All Together. The AES Corporation is led and managed by our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Leadership Team with the guidance and oversight of our Board of Directors.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately 8,450 full time/permanent employees. The following chart lists our full time/permanent employees by SBU:
aes-20211231_g14.jpg

As of December 31, 2021, approximately 35% of our U.S. employees were subject to collective bargaining agreements. Collective bargaining agreements between us and these labor unions expire at various dates ranging from 2023 to 2024. In addition, certain employees in non-U.S. locations were subject to collective bargaining agreements, representing approximately 60% of the non-U.S. workforce. Management believes that the Company's employee relations are favorable.
Safety
At AES, safety is one of our core values. Conducting safe operations at our facilities around the world, so that each person can return home safely, is the cornerstone of our daily activities and decisions. Safety efforts are led by our Chief Operating Officer and supported by safety committees that operate at the local site level. Hazards in the workplace are actively identified and management tracks incidents so remedial actions can be taken to improve workplace safety.
AES has established a Safety Management System (“SMS”) Global Safety Standard that applies to all AES employees, as well as contractors working in AES facilities and construction projects. The SMS requires continuous safety performance monitoring, risk assessment, and performance of periodic integrated environmental, health, and safety audits. The SMS provides a consistent framework for all AES operational businesses and construction projects to set expectations for risk identification and reduction, measure performance, and drive continuous improvements. The SMS standard is consistent with the OHSAS 18001/ISO 45001 standard, and during 2020 approximately 42% of our locations have elected to formally certify their SMS to the OHSAS 18001/ISO 45001 international standard. AES calculates lost time incident (“LTI”) rates for our employees and contractors based on OSHA standards, based on 200,000 labor hours, which equates to 100 workers who work 40 hours per week and 50 weeks per year. In 2021, there was a 11% decrease in LTI cases. In 2021, AES’ LTI Rate was 0.075 for AES


54 | 2021 Annual Report


People, 0.107 for operational contractors, and 0.028 for construction contractors. In 2021, the Company had no work-related fatalities.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant changes that we determined were in the best interest of our employees, as well as the communities in which we operate. This includes having employees work from home to the extent they were able, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing critical on-site work.
Talent
We believe AES’ success depends on its ability to attract, develop, and retain key personnel. The skills, experience, and industry knowledge of key employees significantly benefit our operations and performance. We have a comprehensive approach to managing our talent and developing our leaders in order to ensure our people have the right skills for today and tomorrow, whether that requires us to build new business models or leverage leading technologies.
We emphasize employee development and training. To empower employees, we provide a range of development programs and opportunities, skills, and resources they need to be successful by focusing on experience and exposure, as well as formal programs including our ACE Academy for Talent Development and our Trainee Program.
At AES, we believe that our individual differences make us stronger. Our Diversity and Inclusion Program is led by our Diversity and Inclusion Officer. Governance and standards are guided by the Chief Human Resources Officer, with input from members of the Executive Leadership Team.
Compensation
AES’ executive compensation philosophy emphasizes pay-for-performance. Our incentive plans are designed to reward strong performance, with greater compensation paid when performance exceeds expectations and less compensation paid when performance falls below expectations. We invest significant time and resources to ensure our compensation programs are competitive and reward the performance of our people. Every year, AES people who are not part of a collective bargaining agreement are eligible for an annual merit-based salary increase. In addition, individuals are eligible for a salary increase if they receive a significant promotion. For non-collectively bargained employees at certain levels in the organization, we offer annual incentives (bonus) and long-term compensation to reinforce the alignment between AES' employees and AES.
Executive Officers
The following individuals are our executive officers:
Sanjeev AddalaStephen Coughlin, , 53 50years old, was appointedhas served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information and Digital officer inFinancial Officer since October 2018.2021. Prior to joining AES,assuming his current position, he led AES' Corporate Strategy and Financial Planning teams, and served as the Chair of the Company's Investment Committee. Prior to that role, he served as the Chief Executive Officer of Fluence. Mr. Addala was Chief Digital Officer at GE from 2016 to September 2018, Chief Digital Officer at Caterpillar from 2013 to 2015, and Chief Information Officer, Americas, Climate Control Technologies at Ingersoll-Rand from 2008 to 2013. He also previously held business and technology leadership roles at General Motors from 1994 to 2008. He served on Energize Ventures and AppLariat advisory Boards. Mr. AddalaCoughlin is a member of the Boardboards of AES Distributed Energy.U.S. Investments, Inc. and IPALCO. Mr. Addala holdsCoughlin received a Master of Sciencebachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineeringcommerce and finance from South Dakota Schoolthe University of Mines and Tech.Virginia and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Kellogg SchoolUniversity of ManagementCalifornia at Northwestern University. Mr. Addala has also completed an Executive Leadership program at Duke University.Berkeley.
Bernerd Da Santos, 5558 years old, has beenserved as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President since December 2017. Previously, Mr. Da Santos held several positions at the Company,AES, including Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President from 2014 to 2017, Chief Financial Officer, Global Finance Operations from 2012 to 2014, Chief Financial Officer of Global Utilities from 2011 to 2012, Chief Financial Officer of Latin America and Africa from 2009 to 2011, Chief Financial Officer of Latin America from 2007 to 2009, Managing Director of Finance for Latin America from 2005 to 2007, and VP and Controller of La Electricidad de Caracas ("EDC") (Venezuela). Prior to joining AES in 2000, Mr. Da Santos held a number of financial leadership positions at EDC. Mr. Da Santos is the chairman of AES Gener in Chile and a member of the Boardboards of Companhia Brasiliana deAES Brasil Energia S.A., AES TietêMong Duong Power Co. Ltd., Compañia de Alumbrado Electrico de San Salvador, Empresa Electrica de Oriente, Compañia de Alumbrado Electrico de Santa Ana,AES Andes S.A., IPALCO, and Indianapolis Power & Light.AES Renewable Holdings, LLC. Mr. Da Santos holds a bachelor's degree with Cum Laude distinction in Business Administration and Public Administration from Universidad José Maria Vargas, a bachelor's degree with Cum Laude distinction in Business Management and Finance, and an MBA with Cum Laude distinction from Universidad José Maria Vargas.
Manuel Pérez Dubuc

55 | 2021 Annual Report
, 55 years old, has served as Senior Vice President, Global New Energy Solutions since October 2018. Previously Mr. Pérez Dubuc served as the President of the South America SBU from March 2018 to October 2018 and President of the MCAC SBU from November 2012 to March 2018. He also served as Vice President and General Manager AES North Asia, President of AES Dominicana and Chief Financial Officer of EDC. Mr. Pérez Dubuc is a member of the Boards of SPower, AES Gener, AES Tiete, Fluence and EnerAB, Ron Santa Teresa SACA and GFR Group Advisory board. Prior to joining AES, Mr. Pérez Dubuc served as a Chairman and CEO of Meiya Power Company based in Hong Kong. Mr. Pérez Dubuc studied electrical engineering at the Universidad Simon Bolivar and with a master’s degree in business administration from IESA (Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administración) of Caracas, Venezuela. He attended the Executive Leadership Program at the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business and the Global Executive Leadership Program at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business in 2015. 
Paul L. Freedman, 4851 years old, has been Seniorserved as Executive Vice President, and General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since February 2018 and was appointed Corporate Secretary in October 2018.2021. Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. Freedman served aswas Senior Vice President and General Counsel from February 2018, Corporate Secretary from October 2018, Chief of Staff to the Chief Executive Officer from April 2016 to February 2018, Assistant General Counsel from 2014 to 2016, General Counsel, North America Generation,and from 20112007 to 2014 Senior Corporate Counsel from 2010 to 2011 and Counsel 2007 to 2010.he held a variety of other positions in the AES legal group. Mr. Freedman is a member of the Boards of, IPALCO, AES U.S. Investments, DP&L, Fluence and theInc., IPALCO, AES Ohio, Business Council for International Understanding.Understanding, and the Coalition for Integrity. Prior to joining AES, Mr. Freedman was Chief Counsel for credit programs at the U.S. Agency for International Development and he previously worked as an associate at the law firms of White & Case LLP and Freshfields. Mr. Freedman received a B.A. from Columbia University and a J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center.
Andrés R. Gluski, 6164 years old, has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors since September 2011 and is a member of the Innovation and Technology Committee. Under his leadership, AES has become a world leader in implementing clean technologies, including energy storage and renewable power. AES has received numerous awards and distinctions, such as inclusion in Forbes’ list of Top 50 Green Growth Companies and Newsweek’s list of America’s Most Responsible Companies. In 2021, AES achieved the highest score in the utilities sector on the Wall Street Journal’s list of Top 250 Best Managed Companies. Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. Gluski served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since March 2007.from 2007 to 2011. Prior to becoming the Chief Operating Officerthat role, he served in a number of senior roles at AES, Mr. Gluski was Executive Vice President and theincluding as Regional President of Latin America from 2006 to 2007. Mr. Gluskiand was Senior Vice President for the Caribbean and Central America from 2003 to 2006, Chief Executive Officer of EDC from 2002 to 2003 and Chief Executive Officer of AES Gener (Chile) in 2001.America. Prior to joining AES in 2000, Mr. Gluski was Executive Vice Presidentheld a variety of roles in the public and Chief Financial Officer of EDC, Executive Vice President of Banco de Venezuela (Grupo Santander), Vice President for Santander Investment, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CANTV (subsidiary of GTE). Mr. Gluski has also workedprivate sectors, including with the International Monetary Fund in the Treasury and Latin American Departments and served as Director General of the Ministry of Finance of Venezuela. From 2013 to 2016, Mr. Gluski served on President Obama's Export Council. Mr. GluskiFund. He is a member of the Board of Waste


Management and AES Gener in Chile. Mr. Gluski is alsoserves as Chairman of the Americas Society/Council of the Americas, and Director of the Edison Electric Institute.Americas. Mr. Gluski is a magna cum laude graduate of Wake Forest University and holds an M.A. and a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Virginia.
Lisa KruegerTish Mendoza, 5546 years old, has served as SeniorExecutive Vice President and President of the US SBU since September 2018. Prior to joining AES, Ms. Krueger served as an energy consultant from July 2017 to August 2018, Chief Commercial Officer of Cogentrix Energy Power Management, LLC, the portfolio management company of Carlyle Power Partners, from January 2017 to June 2017, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Essential Power, LLC from March 2014 to June 2017. Ms. Krueger also served as Vice President - Sustainable Development of First Solar, one of the world’s largest photovoltaic manufacturers and system integrators, where she led the development and implementation of various domestic and internal strategic plans focused on market and business development and served as the President of First Solar Electric. Prior to First Solar, Ms. Krueger held a variety of executive level positions with Dynegy, Inc., including Vice President - Enterprise Risk Control, Vice President - Northeast Commercial Operations, Vice President - Origination and Retail Operations, and Vice President, Environmental, Health & Safety. She also held a variety of leadership roles at Illinois Power, including positions in transmission planning and system operations, generation planning and system operations, and environmental, health & safety. Ms. Krueger has a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the Missouri University of Science and Technology and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Jones Graduate School of Business at Rice University.
Tish Mendoza, 43 years old, is Chief Human Resources Officer andsince February 2021. Prior to assuming her current position, Ms. Mendoza was Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources and Internal Communications since 2015. Prior to assuming her current position, Ms. Mendoza was theand Chief Human Resources Officer from 2012, Vice President of Human Resources, Global Utilities from 2011 to 2012, and Vice President of Global Compensation, Benefits and HRIS, including Executive Compensation, from 2008 to 2011, and acted in the same capacity as the Director of the function from 2006 to 2008. In 2015, Ms. Mendoza was appointedis a member of the Boardsboards of AES Chivor S.A. and DP&L,AES Ohio and sits on AES' compensation and benefits committees. She is also currently serving as co-chair of Evanta Global HR, and is part of its governing body in Washington, D.C. Prior to joining AES, Ms. Mendoza was Vice President of Human Resources for a product company in the Treasury Services division of JP Morgan Chase and Vice President of Human Resources and Compensation and Benefits at Vastera, Inc, a former technology and managed services company. Ms. Mendoza earned certificates in Leadership and Human Resource Management, and a bachelor's degree in Business Administration and Human Resources.
Leonardo MorenoJulian Nebreda, 3955 years old, has served as Senior Vice President Corporate Strategyof U.S. and Investments and Chief Risk OfficerGlobal Business Lines since May 2017. Previously Mr. Moreno served as the Chief Financial Officer, Europe SBU from May 2015 to April 2017 and as a Managing Director on AES’ Mergers & Acquisitions team from January 2012 to April 2015. Since joining AES in 2006, Mr. Moreno has served in various positions throughout the Company. Mr. Moreno serves as a member of the Board of DP&L and AES Tiete.2022. Prior to joining AESassuming his current position, Mr. Moreno worked for Ernst & Young. Mr. Moreno has a degree in Business Administration from Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil and has completed executive business and leadership programs at the London Business School, Georgetown University and the University of Virginia.
Julian Nebreda, 52 years old, has served as Senior Vice President and President of the South America SBU sincefrom October 2018. Prior2018 to assuming his current position Mr. Nebreda served asJanuary 2022, the President of the AES Brazil SBU from April 2016 to October 2018, and President of the Europe SBU from June 2009 to April 2016. Prior to June 2009, Mr. Nebreda held several senior positions, such as Vice President for Central America and Caribbean, Chief Executive Officer of EDC and President of AES Dominicana, in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Mr. Nebreda serves as Chairman of the Board of AES GenerAndes S.A. and AES Tiete. Mr. Nebreda is a member of the boards of AES Andes, AES Brazil, Inc., AES Clean Energy Development, Uplight, and Fluence. Before joining AES, Mr. Nebreda has held positions in the public and private sectors, namely he served as Counsellor to the Executive Director from Panama and Venezuela at the Inter-American Development Bank. Mr. Nebreda earned a law degree from Universidad Católica Andrés Bello in Caracas, Venezuela. He also earned a Master of Laws in Common Law with a Fulbright Fellowship and a Master of Laws in Securities and Financial Regulations, both from Georgetown University.
Gustavo Pimenta, Juan Ignacio Rubiolo40, 45 years old, was appointed Executive Vicehas served as President and Chief Financial Officer effectiveof International Businesses since January 1, 2019.2022. Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. PimentaRubiolo served as Deputy Chief Financial Officer from February 2018 to December 2018, Chief Financial Officer for the Company’s MCAC SBU from December 2014 to February 2018 and as Chief Financial Officer of AES Brazil from 2013 to December 2014. Prior to joining AES in 2009, Mr. Pimenta held various positions at Citigroup, including Vice President of Strategy and M&A in London and New York City. Mr. Pimenta received a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais and a Master’s degree in Economics and Finance from Fundação Getulio Vargas. He also participated in development programs in Finance, Strategy and Risk Management at New York University, University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business and Georgetown University.


Juan Ignacio Rubiolo, 42 years old, has served Senior Vice President and President of the MCAC SBU sincefrom March 2018. Previously Mr. Rubiolo served2018 to January 2022, as the Chief Executive Officer of AES Mexico from 2014 to March 2018, and as a Vice President on the Commercial team of the MCAC SBU from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Rubiolo joined AES in 2001 and has worked in AES businesses in the Philippines, Argentina, Mexico, Panama, and the Dominican Republic. Mr. Rubiolo serves on the Boardsboards of AES Gener, Itabo, AES Andres,Andes and AES Panama.Andres. Mr. Rubiolo has a Science Degree in Business from the Universidad Austral of Argentina, a Master of Project Management from the Quebec University in Canada and has completed the executive business and leadership program at the University of Virginia.


56 | 2021 Annual Report

How to Contact AES and Sources of Other Information
Our principal offices are located at 4300 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Our telephone number is (703) 522-1315. Our website address is http://www.aes.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") are posted on our website. After the reports are filed with, or furnished to the SEC, they are available from us free of charge. Material contained on our website is not part of and is not incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. The SEC maintains an internet website that contains the reports, proxy and information statements and other information that we file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Our CEO and our CFO have provided certifications to the SEC as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These certifications are included as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our CEO provided a certification pursuant to Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual on May 8, 2018.12, 2021.
Our Code of Business Conduct ("Code of Conduct") and Corporate Governance Guidelines have been adopted by our Board of Directors. The Code of Conduct is intended to govern, as a requirement of employment, the actions of everyone who works at AES, including employees of our subsidiaries and affiliates. Our Ethics and Compliance Department provides training, information, and certification programs for AES employees related to the Code of Conduct. The Ethics and Compliance Department also has programs in place to prevent and detect criminal conduct, promote an organizational culture that encourages ethical behavior and a commitment to compliance with the law, and to monitor and enforce AES policies on corruption, bribery, money laundering and associations with terrorists groups. The Code of Conduct and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are located in their entirety on our website. Any person may obtain a copy of the Code of Conduct or the Corporate Governance Guidelines without charge by making a written request to: Corporate Secretary, The AES Corporation, 4300 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22203. If any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Conduct or the Corporate Governance Guidelines are made, we will disclose such amendments or waivers on our website.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risks, along with the other information contained in or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. Additional risks and uncertainties also may adversely affect our business and operations, including those discussed in Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Form 10-K. If any of the following events actually occur, our business, financial results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
operations. We routinely encounter and address risks, some of which may cause our future results to be materially different than we presently anticipate. The categories of risk we have identified in Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K include the following:
risks related toassociated with our operations, governmental regulation and laws, our indebtedness and financial condition;
external risks associated with revenue and earnings volatility;
risks associated with our operations; and
risks associated with governmental regulation and laws.
condition. These risk factors should be read in conjunction with Item 7.—7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsin this Form 10-K and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
Risks Related to our Indebtedness and Financial Condition
We have a significant amount of debt, a large percentage of which is secured, that could adversely affect our business and our ability to fulfill our obligations.


As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $19 billion of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis. All outstanding borrowings, if any, under The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility and secured term loan are secured by certain of our assets, including the pledge of capital stock of many of The AES Corporation's directly held subsidiaries. Most of the debt of The AES Corporation's subsidiaries is secured by substantially all of the assets of those subsidiaries. Since we have such a high level of debt, a substantial portion of cash flow from operations must be used to make payments on this debt. Furthermore, since a significant percentage of our assets are used to secure this debt, this reduces the amount of collateral available for future secured debt or credit support and reduces our flexibility in operating these secured assets. This high level of indebtedness and related security could have other important consequences to us and our investors, including:
making it more difficult to satisfy debt service and other obligations at the holding company and/or individual subsidiaries;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse industry and economic conditions, including but not limited to adverse changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices;
reducing available cash flow to fund other corporate purposes and grow our business;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors that are not as highly leveraged; and
limiting, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants relating to such indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds as needed or take advantage of business opportunities as they arise, pay cash dividends or repurchase common stock.
The agreements governing our indebtedness, including the indebtedness of our subsidiaries, limit, but do not prohibit the incurrence of additional indebtedness. If we were to become more leveraged, the risks described above would increase. Further, our actual cash requirements in the future may be greater than expected. Accordingly, our cash flows may not be sufficient to repay at maturity all of the outstanding debt as it becomes due and, in that event, we may not be able to borrow money, sell assets, raise equity or otherwise raise funds on acceptable terms or at all to refinance our debt as it becomes due. In addition, our ability to refinance existing or future indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our debt could come at higher interest rates or may require us to comply with onerous covenants, which could restrict our business operations. See Note 10.Debt included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for a schedule of our debt maturities.
The AES Corporation is a holding company and its ability to make payments on its outstanding indebtedness, including its public debt securities, is dependent upon the receipt of funds from its subsidiaries by way of dividends, fees, interest, loans or otherwise.
The AES Corporation is a holding company with no material assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries. Almost all of The AES Corporation's cash flow is generated by the operating activities of its subsidiaries. Therefore, The AES Corporation's ability to make payments on its indebtedness and to fund its other obligations is dependent not only on the ability of its subsidiaries to generate cash, but also on the ability of the subsidiaries to distribute cash to it in the form of dividends, fees, interest, tax sharing payments, loans or otherwise.
However, our subsidiaries face various restrictions in their ability to distribute cash to The AES Corporation. Most of the subsidiaries are obligated, pursuant to loan agreements, indentures or non-recourse financing arrangements, to satisfy certain restricted payment covenants or other conditions before they may make distributions to The AES Corporation. Business performance and local accounting and tax rules may also limit dividend distributions. Subsidiaries in foreign countries may also be prevented from distributing funds to The AES Corporation as a result of foreign governments restricting the repatriation of funds or the conversion of currencies.
The AES Corporation's subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and, unless they have expressly guaranteed any of The AES Corporation's indebtedness, have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to such debt or to make any funds available whether by dividends, fees, loans or other payments.
Existing and potential future defaults by subsidiaries or affiliates could adversely affect The AES Corporation.
We attempt to finance our domestic and foreign projects primarily under loan agreements and related documents that, except as noted below, require the loans to be repaid solely from the project's revenues and provide that the repayment of the loans (and interest thereon) is secured solely by the capital stock, physical assets, contracts and cash flow of that project subsidiary or affiliate. This type of financing is usually referred to as


non-recourse debt or "non-recourse financing." In some non-recourse financings, The AES Corporation has explicitly agreed to undertake certain limited obligations and contingent liabilities, most of which by their terms will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events. These obligations and liabilities take the form of guarantees, indemnities, letters of credit, letter of credit reimbursement agreements and agreements to pay, in certain circumstances, the project lenders or other parties.
As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $19.3 billion of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis, of which approximately $3.7 billion was recourse debt of The AES Corporation and approximately $15.6 billion was non-recourse debt. In addition, we have outstanding guarantees, indemnities, letters of credit, and other credit support commitments which are further described in this Form 10-K in Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCapital Resources and LiquidityParent Company Liquidity.
Some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness. The total debt classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to such defaults was $351 million as of December 31, 2018. While the lenders under our non-recourse financings generally do not have direct recourse to The AES Corporation (other than to the extent of any credit support given by The AES Corporation), defaults thereunder can still have important consequences for The AES Corporation, including, without limitation:
reducing The AES Corporation's receipt of subsidiary dividends, fees, interest payments, loans and other sources of cash since the project subsidiary will typically be prohibited from distributing cash to The AES Corporation during the pendency of any default;
under certain circumstances, triggering The AES Corporation's obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee, letter of credit or other credit support which The AES Corporation may have provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary;
triggering defaults in The AES Corporation's outstanding debt. For example, The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility, secured term loan, and outstanding senior notes include events of default for certain bankruptcy related events involving material subsidiaries. In addition, The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility includes certain events of default relating to accelerations of outstanding material debt of material subsidiaries or any subsidiaries that in the aggregate constitute a material subsidiary; or
foreclosure on the assets that are pledged under the non-recourse loans, resulting in write-downs of assets and eliminating any and all potential future benefits derived from those assets.
None of the projects that are currently in default are owned by subsidiaries that individually or in the aggregate meet the applicable standard of materiality in The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility or other debt agreements in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under such indebtedness. However, as a result of future mix of distributions, write-down of assets, dispositions and other matters that affect our financial position and results of operations, it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries, individually or in the aggregate, could fall within the applicable standard of materiality and thereby upon an acceleration of such subsidiary's debt, trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under The AES Corporation's senior secured credit facility or other indebtedness of The AES Corporation.
The AES Corporation, or the Parent Company, has significant cash requirements and limited sources of liquidity.
The AES Corporation requires cash primarily to fund:
principal repayments of debt;
interest;
acquisitions;
construction and other project commitments;
other equity commitments, including business development investments;
equity repurchases and/or cash dividends on our common stock;
taxes; and
Parent Company overhead costs.
The AES Corporation's principal sources of liquidity are:
dividends and other distributions from its subsidiaries;


proceeds from debt and equity financings at the Parent Company level; and
proceeds from asset sales.
For a more detailed discussion of The AES Corporation's cash requirements and sources of liquidity, please see Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital Resources and Liquidity in this Form 10-K.
While we believe that these sources will be adequate to meet our obligations at the Parent Company level for the foreseeable future, this belief is based on a number of material assumptions, which could prove incorrect, including, without limitation, assumptions about our ability to access the capital or commercial lending markets, the operating and financial performance of our subsidiaries, exchange rates, our ability to sell assets, and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends and other distributions. There can be no assurance that these sources will be available when needed or that our actual cash requirements will not be greater than expected. In addition, our cash flow may not be sufficient to repay at maturity the entire principal outstanding under our credit facility, term loan, and our debt securities and we may have to refinance such obligations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such refinancing on terms acceptable to us or at all and any of these events could have a material effect on us.
Our ability to grow our business depends on our ability to raise capital on favorable terms.
From time to time, we rely on access to capital markets as a source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows. Our ability to arrange for financing on either a recourse or non-recourse basis and the costs of such capital are dependent on numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:
general economic and capital market conditions;
the availability of bank credit;
the financial condition, performance and prospects of The AES Corporation in general and/or that of any subsidiary requiring the financing;
the financial condition, performance and prospects of other companies in our industry or with similar financial circumstances; and
changes in tax and securities laws which are conducive to raising capital.
Should access to capital not be available to us, we may have to sell assets or decide not to build new plants, or expand or improve existing facilities, either of which would affect our future growth, results of operations or financial condition.
A downgrade in the credit ratings of The AES Corporation or its subsidiaries could adversely affect our access to the capital markets, increase our interest costs and/or adversely affect our liquidity and cash flow.
If any of the credit ratings of The AES Corporation or its subsidiaries were to be downgraded,following events actually occur, our ability to raise capital on favorable termsbusiness, financial results and financial condition could be impaired and our borrowing costs could increase. Furthermore, depending on The AES Corporation's credit ratings and the trading prices of its equity and debt securities, counterparties may no longer be as willing to accept general unsecured commitments by The AES Corporation to provide credit support. Accordingly, with respect to both new and existing commitments, The AES Corporation may be required to provide some other form of assurance, such as a letter of credit and/or collateral, to backstop or replace any credit support by The AES Corporation. There can be no assurance that such counterparties will accept such guarantees or that AES could arrange such further assurances in the future. In addition, to the extent The AES Corporation is required and able to provide letters of credit or other collateral to such counterparties, it will limit the amount of credit available to The AES Corporation to meet its other liquidity needs.
We may not be able to raise sufficient capital to fund development projects in certain less developed economies, which could affect our growth strategy.
Part of our strategy is to grow our business by developing businesses in less developed economies where the return on our investment may be greater than projects in more developed economies. Commercial lending institutions sometimes refuse to provide non-recourse project financing in certain less developed economies, and in these situations we have sought and may continue to seek direct or indirect (through credit support or guarantees) project financing from a limited number of multilateral or bilateral international financial institutions or agencies. As a precondition to making such project financing available, the lending institutions may also require governmental guarantees for certain project and sovereign-related risks. There can be no assurance, however, that project financing from the international financial agencies or that governmental guarantees will be available when needed,


and if they are not, we may have to abandon the relevant project or invest more of our own funds, which may not be in line with our investment objectives and would leave less funds for other projects.
External Risks Associated with Revenue and Earnings Volatility
Our businesses may incur substantial costs and liabilities and be exposed to price volatility as a result of risks associated with the wholesale electricity markets.
Some of our businesses sell electricity in the spot markets when they operate at levels in excess of their power sales agreements or retail load obligations or when they do not have any powers sales agreements. Our businesses may also buy electricity in the wholesale spot markets. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of rising and falling prices in those markets. The open market wholesale prices for electricity can be volatile and generally reflect the variable cost of the source generation which could include renewable sources at near zero pricing or thermal sources subject to fluctuating cost of fuels such as coal, natural gas or oil derivative fuels in addition to other factors described below. Consequently, any changes in the generation supply stack and cost of coal, natural gas, or oil derivative fuels may impact the open market wholesale price of electricity.
Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity may result from, among other things:
plant availability in the markets generally;
availability and effectiveness of transmission facilities owned and operated by third parties;
competition;
seasonality;
hydrology and other weather conditions;
illiquid markets;
transmission,transportation constraints, inefficiencies and/or availability;
renewables source contribution to the supply stack;
new entrants;
increased adoption of distributed generation;
energy efficiency and demand side resources;
available supplies of coal, natural gas, and crude oil and refined products;
generating unit performance;
natural disasters, terrorism, wars, embargoes, and other catastrophic events;
energy, market and environmental regulation, legislation and policies;
general economic conditions globally as well as in areas where we operate that impact demand and energy consumption; and
bidding behavior and market bidding rules.
Adverse economic developments in China could have a negative impact on demand for electricity in many of our markets.
The Chinese market has been driving global materials demand and pricing for commodities over the past decade. Many of these commodities are produced in areas that are also our key markets for the sale of electricity. After experiencing rapid growth for more than a decade, China’s economy has experienced decreasing foreign and domestic demand, weak investment, factory overcapacity and oversupply in the property market, and has experienced a significant slowdown in recent years. U.S. tariffs are also expected to have a negative impact on China's economic growth. Continued slowing in China’s economic growth, demand for commodities and/or material changes in policy could result in lower economic growth and lower demand for electricity in our key markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Our financial position and results of operations may fluctuate significantly due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates experienced at our foreign operations.
Our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations results primarily from the translation exposure associated with the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as from transaction exposure associated with transactions in currencies other than an entity's functional currency. While the Consolidated Financial Statements are reported in U.S. dollars, the financial statements of several of our subsidiaries outside the United States are prepared using the local currency as the functional currency and translated into U.S. dollars by applying appropriate exchange rates. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar relative to the local currencies


where our subsidiaries outside the United States report could cause significant fluctuations in our results. In addition, while our expenses with respect to foreign operations are generally denominated in the same currency as corresponding sales, we have transaction exposure to the extent receipts and expenditures are not denominated in the subsidiary's functional currency. Moreover, the costs of doing business abroad may increase as a result of adverse exchange rate fluctuations. Our financial position and results of operations could bematerially adversely affected by fluctuations in the value of a number of currencies.
Wholesale power prices are declining in many markets and this could have a material adverse effect on our operations and opportunities for future growth.
The wholesale prices offered for electricity have declined significantly in recent years in many markets in which the Company has businesses. This price decline is due to a variety of factors, including the increased penetration of renewable generation resources, low-priced natural gas and demand side management. The levelized cost of electricity from new solar and wind generation sources has dropped substantially in recent years as solar panel costs and wind turbine costs have declined, while wind and solar capacity factors have increased. These renewable resources have no fuel costs and very low operational costs. In many instances, energy from these facilities are bid into the wholesale spot market at a price of zero or close to zero during certain times of the day, driving down the clearing price for all generators selling power in the relevant spot market. Also, in many markets new PPAs have been awarded for renewable generation at prices significantly lower than the prices being awarded just a few years ago.
This trend of declining wholesale prices could continue and could have a material adverse impact on the financial performance of our existing generation assets to the extent they currently sell power into the spot market or will seek to sell power into the spot market once their PPAs expire. The trend of declining prices can also make it more difficult for us to obtain attractive prices under new long-term PPAs for any new generation facilities we may seek to develop. As a result, the trend can have an adverse impact on our opportunities for new investments.
We may not be adequately hedged against our exposure to changes in commodity prices or interest rates.
We routinely enter into contracts to hedge a portion of our purchase and sale commitments for electricity, fuel requirements and other commodities to lower our financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations. As part of this strategy, we routinely utilize fixed price or indexed forward physical purchase and sales contracts, futures, financial swaps, and option contracts traded in the over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. We also enter into contracts which help us manage our interest rate exposure. However, we may not cover the entire exposure of our assets or positions to market price or interest rate volatility, and the coverage will vary over time. Furthermore, the risk management practices we have in place may not always perform as planned. In particular, if prices of commodities or interest rates significantly deviate from historical prices or interest rates or if the price or interest rate volatility or distribution of these changes deviates from historical norms, our risk management practices may not protect us from significant losses. As a result, fluctuating commodity prices or interest rates may negatively impact our financial results to the extent we have unhedged or inadequately hedged positions. In addition, certain types of economic hedging activities may not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP, resulting in increased volatility in our net income. The Company may also suffer losses associated with "basis risk," which is the difference in performance between the hedge instrument and the underlying exposure (usually the pricing node of the generation facility). Furthermore, there is a risk that the current counterparties to these arrangements may fail or are unable to perform part or all of their obligations under these arrangements, while we seek to protect against that by utilizing strong credit requirements and exchange trades, these protections may not fully cover the exposure in the event of a counterparty default.
For our businesses with PPA pricing that does not completely pass through our fuel costs, the businesses attempt to manage the exposure through flexible fuel purchasing and timing of entry and terms of our fuel supply agreements; however, these risk management efforts may not be successful and the resulting commodity exposure could have a material impact on these businesses and/or our results of operations.
Supplier and/or customer concentration may expose the Company to significant financial credit or performance risks.
We often rely on a single contracted supplier or a small number of suppliers for the provision of fuel, transportation of fuel and other services required for the operation of some of our facilities. If these suppliers cannot perform, we would seek to meet our fuel requirements by purchasing fuel at market prices, exposing us to market price volatility and the risk that fuel and transportation may not be available during certain periods at any price, which could adversely impact the profitability of the affected business and our results of operations, and could result in a breach of agreements with other counterparties, including, without limitation, offtakers or lenders.


At times, we rely on a single customer or a few customers to purchase all or a significant portion of a facility's output, in some cases under long-term agreements that account for a substantial percentage of the anticipated revenue from a given facility. Counterparties to these agreements may breach or may be unable to perform their obligations, due to bankruptcy, insolvency, financial distress or other factors. Furthermore, in the event of a bankruptcy or similar insolvency-type proceeding, our counterparty can seek to reject our existing PPA under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar bankruptcy laws, including those in Puerto Rico. We may not be able to enter into replacement agreements on terms as favorable as our existing agreements, or at all. If we were unable to enter into replacement PPAs, these businesses may have to sell power at market prices. A breach by a counterparty of a PPA or other agreement could also result in the breach of other agreements, including, without limitation, the debt documents of the affected business.
The financial performance of our facilities is dependent on the credit quality of, and continued performance by, suppliers and customers. Any failure of a supplier or customer to fulfill its contractual obligations to The AES Corporation or our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price and trading volumes of our common stock could fluctuate substantially in the future. Factors that could affect the price of our common stock include, among other factors, general conditions in our industry and the power markets in which we participate, environmental and economic developments, and general credit and capital markets conditions, as well as developments specific to us, including risks that could result in revenue and earnings volatility, failing to meet our publicly announced guidance or other risk factors described in Item 1A.—Risk Factors and key trends and other matters described in Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.
Risks Associated with our Operations
We do a significant amount of business outside the United States, including in developing countries, which presents significant risks.
A significant amount of our revenue is generated outside the United States and a significant portion of our international operations is conducted in developing countries. Part of our growth strategy is to expand our business in certain developing countries in which AES has an existing presence. We believe these countries may have higher growth rates and offer greater opportunities, with potentially higher returns than in some more developed countries. International operations, particularly the operation, financing and development of projects in developing countries, entail significant risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation:
economic, social and political instability in any particular country or region;
adverse changes in currency exchange rates;
government restrictions on converting currencies or repatriating funds;
unexpected changes in foreign laws and regulations or in trade, monetary, fiscal or environmental policies;
high inflation and monetary fluctuations;
restrictions on imports of coal, oil, gas or other raw materials required by our generation businesses to operate;
threatened or consummated expropriation or nationalization of our assets by foreign governments;
unexpected delays in permitting and governmental approvals;
unexpected changes or instability affecting our strategic partners in developing countries;
risks relating to the failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, UK Bribery Act or other anti-bribery laws applicable to our operations, including, among other things, cost and disruption in responding to allegations or investigations (regardless of ultimate finding), civil and/or criminal fines, criminal prosecution of individuals, revocation or suspension of permits and/or licenses, civil litigation, reputational damage, loss in share price, and loss of business;
difficulties in hiring, training and retaining qualified personnel, particularly finance and accounting personnel with GAAP expertise;
unwillingness of governments and their agencies, similar organizations or other counterparties to honor their contracts;
unwillingness of governments, government agencies, courts or similar bodies to enforce contracts that are economically advantageous to subsidiaries of the Company and less beneficial to counterparties, against such counterparties, whether such counterparties are governments or private parties;


inability to obtain access to fair and equitable political, regulatory, administrative and legal systems;
adverse changes in government tax policy;
difficulties in enforcing our contractual rights or enforcing judgments or obtaining a favorable result in local jurisdictions; and
potentially adverse tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions.
Any of these factors, by itself or in combination with others, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our operations may experience volatility in revenues and operating margin which have caused and are expected to cause significant volatility in our results of operations and cash flows. The volatility is caused by regulatory and economic difficulties, political instability and currency devaluations being experienced in many of these countries. This volatility reduces the predictability and enhances the uncertainty associated with cash flows from these businesses. A number of our businesses are facing challenges associated with regulatory changes. 
The operation of power generation, distribution and transmission facilities involves significant risks that could adversely affect our financial results.risks.
We are in the business of generating and distributing electricity, which involves certain risks that can adversely affect financial and operating performance, including:
changes in the availability of our generation facilities or distribution systems due to increases in scheduled and unscheduled plant outages, equipment failure, failure of transmission systems, labor disputes, disruptions in fuel supply, poor hydrologic and wind conditions, inability to comply with regulatory or permit requirements, or catastrophic events such as fires, floods, storms, hurricanes, earthquakes, dam failures, tsunamis, explosions, terrorist acts, cyber attacks or other similar occurrences; and
changes in our operating cost structure, including, but not limited to, increases in costs relating to gas, coal, oil and other fuel; fuel transportation; purchased electricity; operations, maintenance and repair; environmental compliance, including the cost of purchasing emissions offsets and capital expenditures to install environmental emission equipment; transmission access; and insurance.


57 | 2021 Annual Report

Our businesses require reliable transportation sources (including related infrastructure such as roads, ports and rail), power sources and water sources to access and conduct operations. The availability and cost of this infrastructure affects capital and operating costs and levels of production and sales. Limitations, or interruptions in this infrastructure or at the facilities of our subsidiaries, including as a result of third parties intentionally or unintentionally disrupting this infrastructure or the facilities of our subsidiaries, could impede their ability to produce electricity. This could have a material adverse effect on our businesses' results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
In addition, a portion of our generation facilities were constructed many years ago. Older generating equipmentago and may require significant capital expenditures for maintenance. The equipment at our plants whether old or new, is also likely to requirerequires periodic upgrading, improvement or repair and replacement equipment or parts may be difficult to obtain in circumstances where we rely on a single supplier or a small number of suppliers. The inability to obtain replacement equipment or parts, due to disruption of the supply chain or other factors, may impact the ability of our plants to perform and could, therefore, have a material impact on our business and results of operations.perform. Breakdown or failure of one of our operating facilities may prevent the facility from performing under applicable power sales agreements which, in certain situations, could result in termination of a power purchase or other agreement or incurrence of a liability for liquidated damages and/or other penalties.
Power generation involves hazardous activities, including acquiring, transporting and unloading fuel, operating large pieces of rotating equipment and delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. In addition to natural risks, such as earthquakes, floods, lightning, hurricanes and wind, hazards, such as fire, explosion, collapse and machinery failure, are inherent risks in our operations which may occur as a result of inadequate internal processes, technological flaws, human error or actions of third parties or other external events. The control and management of these risks depend upon adequate development and training of personnel and on the existence of operational procedures, preventative maintenance plans, and specific programs supported by quality control systems, which reduce, but domay not eliminate, the possibility ofprevent the occurrence and impact of these risks.
The hazards described above, along with other safety hazards associated with our operations, can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment, contamination of, or damage to, the environment and suspension of operations. The occurrence of any one of these events may result in our being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for substantial damages, environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and fines and/or penalties.


Furthermore, we and our affiliates are parties to material litigation and regulatory proceedings. See Item 3.— Legal Proceedingsbelow. There can be no assurance that the outcomes of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.
We do a significant amount of business outside the U.S., including in developing countries.
A significant amount of our revenue is generated in developing countries and we intend to expand our business in certain developing countries in which AES or its customers have an existing presence. International operations, particularly in developing countries, entail significant risks and uncertainties, including:
economic, social and political instability in any particular country or region;
adverse changes in currency exchange rates;
government restrictions on converting currencies or repatriating funds;
unexpected changes in foreign laws and regulations or in trade, monetary, fiscal or environmental policies;
high inflation and monetary fluctuations;
restrictions on imports of solar panels, wind turbines, coal, oil, gas or other raw materials;
threatened or consummated expropriation or nationalization of our assets by foreign governments;
unexpected delays in permitting and governmental approvals;
unexpected changes or instability affecting our strategic partners in developing countries;
failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or other applicable anti-bribery regulations;
unwillingness of governments, agencies, similar organizations or other counterparties to honor contracts;
unwillingness of governments, government agencies, courts or similar bodies to enforce contracts that are economically advantageous to AES and less beneficial to government or private party counterparties, against those counterparties;
inability to obtain access to fair and equitable political, regulatory, administrative and legal systems;
adverse changes in government tax policy and tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions;


58 | 2021 Annual Report

difficulties in enforcing our contractual rights or enforcing judgments or obtaining a favorable result in local jurisdictions; and
inability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
Developing projects in less developed economies also entails greater financing risks and such financing may only be available from multilateral or bilateral international financial institutions or agencies that require governmental guarantees for certain project and sovereign-related risks. There can be no assurance that project financing will be available.
Further, our operations may experience volatility in revenues and operating margin caused by regulatory and economic difficulties, political instability and currency devaluations, which may increase the uncertainty of cash flows from these businesses.
Any of these factors could have a material, adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our businesses may incur substantial costs and liabilities and be exposed to price volatility as a result of risks associated with the wholesale electricity markets.
Some of our businesses sell or buy electricity in the spot markets when they operate at levels that differ from their power sales agreements or retail load obligations or when they do not have any powers sales agreements. Our businesses may also buy electricity in the wholesale spot markets. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of rising and falling prices in those markets. The open market wholesale prices for electricity can be volatile and generally reflect the variable cost of the source generation which could include renewable sources at near zero pricing or thermal sources subject to fluctuating cost of fuels such as coal, natural gas or oil derivative fuels in addition to other factors described below. Consequently, any changes in the generation supply stack and cost of coal, natural gas, or oil derivative fuels may impact the open market wholesale price of electricity.
Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity may result from, among other things:
plant availability in the markets generally;
availability and effectiveness of transmission facilities owned and operated by third parties;
competition and new entrants;
seasonality, hydrology and other weather conditions;
illiquid markets;
transmission, transportation constraints, inefficiencies and/or availability;
renewables source contribution to the supply stack;
increased adoption of distributed generation;
energy efficiency and demand side resources;
available supplies of coal, natural gas, and crude oil and refined products;
generating unit performance;
natural disasters, terrorism, wars, embargoes, pandemics and other catastrophic events;
energy, market and environmental regulation, legislation and policies;
general economic conditions that impact demand and energy consumption; and
bidding behavior and market bidding rules.
Wholesale power prices may experience significant volatility in our markets which could impact our operations and opportunities for future growth.
The wholesale prices offered for electricity have been volatile in the markets in which we operate due to a variety of factors, including the increased penetration of renewable generation resources, low-priced natural gas and demand side management. The levelized cost of electricity from new solar and wind generation sources has decreased substantially in recent years as solar panel costs and wind turbine costs have declined, while wind and solar capacity factors have increased. These renewable resources have no fuel costs and very low operational costs, while only operating during certain periods of time (daylight) or weather conditions (higher winds). This, combined with changes in oil, gas, and coal pricing, has led to increasingly volatile electricity markets across our


59 | 2021 Annual Report

markets. Also, in many markets, new PPAs have been awarded for renewable generation at prices significantly lower than those awarded just a few years ago.
This trend of volatility in wholesale prices could continue and could have a material adverse impact on the financial performance of our existing generation assets to the extent they currently sell or buy power into the spot market to serve our contracts or will seek to sell power into the spot market once our contracts expire.
The COVID-19 pandemic, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could impact our business and operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted global economic activity, including electricity and energy consumption. COVID-19 or another pandemic could have material and adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows due to, among other factors:
further decline in customer demand as a result of general decline in business activity;
further destabilization of the markets and decline in business activity negatively impacting customers’ ability to pay for our services when due or at all, including downstream impacts, whereby the utilities’ customers are unable to pay monthly bills or receiving a moratorium from payment obligations, resulting in inability on the part of utilities to make payments for power supplied by our generation companies;
decline in business activity causing our commercial and industrial customers to experience declining revenues and liquidity difficulties that impede their ability to pay for power that we supply;
government moratoriums or other regulatory or legislative actions that limit changes in pricing, delay or suspend customers’ payment obligations or permit extended payment terms applicable to customers of our utilities or to our offtakers under power purchase agreements, in particular, to the extent that such measures are not mitigated by associated government subsidies or other support to address any shortfall or deficiencies in payments;
claims by our PPA counterparties for delay or relief from payment obligations or other adjustments, including claims based on force majeure or other legal grounds;
further decline in spot electricity prices;
the destabilization of the markets and decline in business activity negatively impacting our customer growth in our service territories at our utilities;
negative impacts on the health of our essential personnel and on our operations as a result of implementing stay-at-home, quarantine, curfew and other social distancing measures;
delays or inability to access, transport and deliver fuel to our generation facilities due to restrictions on business operations or other factors affecting us and our third-party suppliers;
delays or inability to access equipment or the availability of personnel to perform planned and unplanned maintenance or disruptions in supply chain, which can, in turn, lead to disruption in operations;
a deterioration in our ability to ensure business continuity, including increased cybersecurity attacks related to the work-from-home environment;
further delays to our construction projects, including at our renewables projects, and the timing of the completion of renewables projects;
delay or inability to receive the necessary permits for our development projects due to delays or shutdowns of government operations;
delays in achieving our financial goals, strategy and digital transformation;
deterioration of the credit profile of The AES Corporation and/or its subsidiaries and difficulty accessing the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, or at all, and a severe disruption and instability in the global financial markets, or deterioration in credit and financing conditions, which could affect our access to capital necessary to fund business operations or address maturing liabilities on a timely basis;
delays or inability to complete asset sales on anticipated terms or to redeploy capital as set forth in our capital allocation plans;
increased volatility in foreign exchange and commodity markets;
deterioration of economic conditions, demand and other related factors resulting in impairments to goodwill or long-lived assets; and


60 | 2021 Annual Report

delay or inability in obtaining regulatory actions and outcomes that could be material to our business, including for recovery of COVID-19 related losses and the review and approval of our rates at our U.S. regulated utilities.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic also depends on factors, including the effectiveness and timing of vaccine development and distribution efforts, the development of more virulent COVID-19 variants as well as third-party actions taken to contain its spread and mitigate its public health effects. The COVID-19 pandemic presents material uncertainty that could adversely affect our generation facilities, transmission and distribution systems, development projects, energy storage sales by Fluence, and results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The COVID-19 pandemic may also heighten many of the other risks described in this section.
Adverse economic developments in China could have a negative impact on demand for electricity in many of our markets.
The Chinese market has been driving global materials demand and pricing for commodities over the past decade. Many of these commodities are produced in our key electricity markets. After experiencing rapid growth for more than a decade, China’s economy has experienced decreasing foreign and domestic demand, weak investment, factory overcapacity and oversupply in the property market, and has experienced a significant slowdown in recent years. U.S. tariffs have also had a negative impact on China's economic growth. Continued slowing in China’s economic growth, demand for commodities and/or material changes in policy could result in lower economic growth and lower demand for electricity in our key markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
We may not have adequate risk mitigation and/or insurance coverage for liabilities.
Power generation, distribution and transmission involves hazardous activities. We may from time to time become exposed to significant liabilities for which we may not have adequate risk mitigation and/or insurance coverage. Furthermore, through AGIC, AES’ captive insurance company, we take certain insurance risk on our businesses. We maintain an amount of insurance protection that we believe is customary, but there can be no assurance that our insuranceit will be sufficient or effective underin light of all circumstances, and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject. Our insurance does not cover every potential risk associated with our operations. Adequate coverage at reasonable rates is not always obtainable and dueobtainable. In particular, the availability of insurance for coal-fired generation assets has decreased as certain insurers have opted to the cyclical nature of thediscontinue or limit offering insurance markets, wefor such assets. Certain insurers have also withdrawn from insuring hydroelectric assets. We cannot provide assurance that insurance coverage will continue to be available in the amounts or on terms similar to those presently available to us or at all.our current policies. In addition, insurance may not fully cover the liability or the consequences of any business interruptions such as natural catastrophes, equipment failure or labor dispute.
The occurrence of a significant adverse event not fully or partiallyadequately covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, results or operations, financial condition, and prospects.
We may not be able to enter into long-term contracts that reduce volatility in our results of operations.results.
Many of our generation plants conduct business under long-term sales and supply contracts, which helps these businesses to manage risks by reducing the volatility associated with power and input costs and providing a stable revenue and cost structure. In these instances, we rely on power sales contracts with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of, and in some cases all of, the relevant plant's output and revenues over the term of the power sales contract. The remaining terms of the power sales contracts of our generation plants range from one to more than 20 years. In many cases, we also limit our exposure to fluctuations in fuel prices by entering into long-term contracts for fuel with a limited number of suppliers. In these instances, the cash flows and results of operations are dependent on the continued ability of customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under the relevant power sales contract or fuel supply contract, respectively. Some of our long-term power sales agreements are at prices above current spot market prices and some of our long-term fuel supply contracts are at prices below current market prices. The loss of significant power sales contracts or fuel supply contracts, or the failure by any of the parties to such contracts that prevents us from fulfilling our obligations thereunder, could adversely impact our strategy by resulting in costs that exceed revenue, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, depending on market conditions and regulatory regimes, it may be difficult for us to secure long-term contracts, either where our current contracts are expiring or for new development projects. The inability to enter into long-term contracts could require many of our businesses to purchase inputs at market prices and sell electricity into spot markets, which may not be favorable.


61 | 2021 Annual Report

We have sought to reduce counterparty credit risk under our long-term contracts in part by entering into power sales contracts with utilities or other customers of strong credit quality and by obtaining guarantees from certain sovereign governments of the customer's obligations. However,obligations; however, many of our customers do not have or have failed to maintain, annot maintained, investment-grade credit rating, and ourratings. Our generation businessbusinesses cannot always obtain government guarantees and if they do, the government doesmay not always have an investment grade credit rating. We have also sought to reduce our credit risk by locatinglocated our plants in different geographic areas in order to mitigate the effects of regional economic downturns; however, there can be no assurance that our efforts to mitigate this risk will be successful.effective.
Our renewable energy projects and other initiatives face considerable uncertainties.
Wind, solar, and energy storage projects are subject to substantial risks. Some of these business lines are dependent upon favorable regulatory incentives to support continued investment, and there is significant uncertainty about the extent to which such favorable regulatory incentives will be available in the future. In particular, in the U.S., AES’ renewable energy generation growth strategy depends in part on federal, state and local government policies and incentives that support the development, financing, ownership and operation of renewable energy generation projects, including investment tax credits, production tax credits, accelerated depreciation, renewable portfolio standards, feed-in-tariffs and similar programs, renewable energy credit mechanisms, and tax exemptions. If these policies and incentives are changed or eliminated, or AES is unable to use them, there could be a material adverse impact on AES’ U.S. renewable growth opportunities, including fewer future PPAs or lower prices in future PPAs, decreased revenues, reduced economic returns on certain project company investments, increased financing costs, and/or difficulty obtaining financing.
Furthermore, production levels for our wind and solar projects may be dependent upon adequate wind or sunlight resulting in volatility in production levels and profitability. For our wind projects, wind resource estimates are based on historical experience when available and on wind resource studies conducted by an independent engineer. These wind resource estimates are not expected to reflect actual wind energy production in any given year, but long-term averages of a resource.
As a result, these types of projects face considerable risk, including that favorable regulatory regimes expire or are adversely modified. At the development or acquisition stage, our ability to predict actual performance results may be hindered and the projects may not perform as predicted. There are also risks associated with the fact that some of these projects exist in markets where long-term fixed-price contracts for the major cost and revenue components may be unavailable, which in turn may result in these projects having relatively high levels of volatility. These projects can be capital-intensive and generally are designed with a view to obtaining third-party financing, which may be difficult to obtain. As a result, these capital constraints may reduce our ability to develop or obtain third-party financing for these projects.
Our acquisitions may not perform as expected.
Acquisitions have been a significant part of our growth strategy historically and more recently as we grow our renewables business. Although acquired businesses may have significant operating histories, we may have limited or no history of owning and operating certain of these businesses, and possibly limited or no experience operating in the country or region where these businesses are located. We also may encounter challenges in integrating and realizing the expected benefits of these acquisitions as well as integration or other one-time costs that are greater than expected. Such businesses may not generate sufficient cash flow to support the indebtedness incurred to acquire them or the capital expenditures needed to develop them; and the rate of return from such businesses may not justify our investment of capital to acquire them. In addition, some of these businesses may have been government owned and some may be operated as part of a larger integrated utility prior to their acquisition. If we were to acquire any of these types of businesses, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in transitioning them to private ownership or that we will not incur unforeseen obligations or liabilities.
Competition is increasing and could adversely affect us.
The power production markets in which we operate are characterized by numerous strong and capable competitors, many of whom may have extensive and diversified developmental or operating experience (including both domestic and international) and financial resources similar to, or greater than, ours. Further, in recent years, the power production industry has been characterized by strong and increasing competition with respect to both obtaining power sales agreements and acquiring existing power generation assets. In certain markets, these factors have caused reductions in prices contained in new power sales agreements and, in many cases, have caused higher acquisition prices for existing assets through competitive bidding practices. The evolution of competitive


62 | 2021 Annual Report

electricity markets and the development of highly efficient gas-fired power plants and renewables such as wind and solar have also caused, and could continue to cause, price pressure in certain power markets where we sell or intend to sell power. In addition, the introduction of low-cost disruptive technologies or the entry of non-traditional competitors into our sector and markets could adversely affect our ability to compete, which could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, operating results and financial condition.
OurSupplier and/or customer concentration may expose us to significant financial credit or performance risks.
We often rely on a single contracted supplier or a small number of suppliers for the provision of fuel, transportation of fuel and other services required for the operation of some of our facilities. If these suppliers cannot perform, we would seek to meet our fuel requirements by purchasing fuel at market prices, exposing us to market price volatility and the risk that fuel and transportation may not be available during certain periods at any price, which could adversely impact the profitability of the affected business and our results of operations, and could result in a breach of agreements with other counterparties, including, without limitation, offtakers or lenders. Further, our suppliers may source certain materials from areas impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which may cause delays and/or disruptions to our development projects or operations.
The financial performance of our facilities is dependent on the credit quality of, and continued performance by, suppliers and customers. At times, we rely on a single customer or a few customers to purchase all or a significant portion of a facility's output, in some cases under long-term agreements that account for a substantial percentage of the anticipated revenue from a given facility. Counterparties to these agreements may breach or may be unable to perform their obligations, due to bankruptcy, insolvency, financial distress or other factors. Furthermore, in the event of a bankruptcy or similar insolvency-type proceeding, our counterparty can seek to reject our existing PPA under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar bankruptcy laws, including those in Puerto Rico. We may not be able to enter into replacement agreements on terms as favorable as our existing agreements, and may have to sell power at market prices. A counterparty's breach by of a PPA or other agreement could also result in the breach of other agreements, including the affected businesses will needdebt agreements. Any failure of a supplier or customer to continue to adapt to technological change and wefulfill its contractual obligations could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We may incur significant expenditures to adapt to theseour businesses to technological changes.


Emerging technologies may be superior to, or may not be compatible with, some of our existing technologies, investments and infrastructure, and may require us to make significant expenditures to remain competitive, or may result in the obsolescence of certain of our operating assets. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and successfully adapt to technological changes, to offer services and products that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards.
Technological changes that could impact our businesses include:
technologies that change the utilization of electric generation, transmission and distribution assets, including the expanded cost-effective utilization of distributed generation (e.g., rooftop solar and community solar projects), and energy storage technology;
advances in distributed and local power generation and energy storage that reduce the demand for large-scale renewable electricity generation and/or impact our customers’ ability to perform underperformance of long-term agreements; and
more cost-effective batteries for energy storage, advances in solar or wind technology, and advances in alternative fuels and other alternative energy sources.
Emerging technologies may also allow new competitors to more effectively compete in our markets or disintermediate the services we provide our customers, including traditional utility and centralized generation services. If we incur significant expenditures in adapting to technological changes, fail to adapt to significant technological changes, fail to obtain access to important new technologies, fail to recover a significant portion of any remaining investment in obsolete assets, or if implemented technology fails to operate as intended, our businesses, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Cyber-attacks and data security breaches could harm our business.
Our business relies on electronic systems and network technologies to operate our generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure. We also use various financial, accounting and other infrastructure systems. Our infrastructure may be targeted by nation states, hacktivists, criminals, insiders or terrorist groups. Such an attack, by hacking, malware or other means, may interrupt our operations, cause property damage, affect our ability to control


63 | 2021 Annual Report

our infrastructure assets, cause the release of sensitive customer information or limit communications with third parties. Any loss or corruption of confidential or proprietary data through a breach may:
impact our operations, revenue, strategic objectives, customer and vendor relationships;
expose us to legal claims and/or regulatory investigations and proceedings;
require extensive repair and restoration costs for additional security measures to avert future attacks; and
impair our reputation and limit our competitiveness for future opportunities.
impact our financial and accounting systems and, subsequently, our ability to correctly record, process and report financial information.
We have implemented measures to help prevent unauthorized access to our systems and facilities, including certain measures to comply with mandatory regulatory reliability standards. To date, cyber-attacks have not had a material impact on our operations or financial results. We continue to assess potential threats and vulnerabilities and make investments to address them, including global monitoring of networks and systems, identifying and implementing new technology, improving user awareness through employee security training, and updating our security policies as well as those for third-party providers. We cannot guarantee the extent to which our security measures will prevent future cyber-attacks and security breaches or that our insurance coverage will adequately cover any losses we may experience. Further, we do not control certain of joint ventures or our equity method investments and cannot guarantee that their efforts will be effective.
Certain of our businesses are sensitive to variations in weather and hydrology.
Our businesses are affected by variations in general weather patterns and unusually severe weather. Our businesses forecast electric sales based on best available information and expectations for weather, which represents a long-term historical average. While we also consider possible variations in normal weather patterns and potential impacts on our facilities and our businesses, there can be no assurance that such planning can prevent these impacts, which can adversely affect our business. Generally, demand for electricity peaks in winter and summer. Typically, when winters are warmer than expected and summers are cooler than expected, demand for energy is lower, resulting in less demand for electricity than forecasted. Significant variations from normal weather where our businesses are located could have a material impact on our results of operations.
Changes in weather can also affect the production of electricity at power generation facilities, including, but not limited to, our wind and solar facilities. For example, the level of wind resource affects the revenue produced by wind generation facilities. Because the levels of wind and solar resources are variable and difficult to predict, our results of operations for individual wind and solar facilities specifically, and our results of operations generally, may vary significantly from period to period, depending on the level of available resources. To the extent that resources are not available at planned levels, the financial results from these facilities may be less than expected.
In addition, we are dependent upon hydrological conditions prevailing from time to time in the broad geographic regions in which our hydroelectric generation facilities are located. Changes in temperature, precipitation and snow pack conditions also could affect the amount and timing of hydroelectric generation.
IfTo the extent that hydrological conditions result in droughts or other conditions that negatively affect our hydroelectric generation business, such as has happened in Panama in 2019, our results of operations couldcan be materially adversely affected. Additionally, our contracts in certain markets where hydroelectric facilities are prevalent may require us to purchase power in the spot markets when our facilities are unable to operate (or operate at lower than anticipated levels)levels and the price of such spot power may increase substantially in times of low hydrology.
Severe weather and natural disasters may present significant risks to our business and adversely affect our financial results.business.
Weather conditions directly influence the demand for electricity and natural gas and other fuels and affect the price of energy and energy-related commodities. In addition, severe weather and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, icing events, earthquakes, dam failures and tsunamis can be destructive and could prevent us from operating our business in the normal course by causing power outages and property damage, reducing revenue, affecting the availability of fuel and water, causing injuries and loss of life, and requiring us to incur additional costs, for example, to restore service and repair damaged facilities, to obtain replacement power and to access available financing sources. Our power plants could be placed at greater risk of damage should changes in the global climate produce unusual variations in temperature and weather patterns, resulting in more intense, frequent and extreme weather events, including heatwaves, fewer cold temperature extremes, abnormal levels of precipitation resulting in


river and coastal urban floods in North America or reduced water availability and increased flooding across Central and South America, and changes in coast lines due to sea level change.


64 | 2021 Annual Report

Depending on the nature and location of the facilities and infrastructure affected, any such incident also could cause catastrophic fires; releases of natural gas, natural gas odorant, or other greenhouse gases; explosions, spills or other significant damage to natural resources or property belonging to third parties; personal injuries, health impacts or fatalities; or present a nuisance to impacted communities. Such incidents that do not directly affect our facilities may also impact our business partners, supply chains and transportation, which could negatively impact construction projects and our ability to provide electricity and natural gas to our customers.
A disruption or failure of electric generation, transmission or distribution systems or natural gas production, transmission, storage or distribution systems in the event of a hurricane, tornado or other severe weather event, or otherwise, could prevent us from operating our business in the normal course and could result in any of the adverse consequences described above. At our businesses where cost recovery is available, recovery of costs to restore service and repair damaged facilities is or may be subject to regulatory approval, and any determination by the regulator not to permit timely and full recovery of the costs incurred.
Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects.
Our development projects are subject to substantial uncertainties.
Certain of our subsidiaries and affiliatesWe are in various stages of developing and constructing power plants. Some but not allplants and renewables projects. Certain of these power plant projects have signed long-term contracts or made similar arrangements for the sale of electricity. Successful completion of the development of these projects depends upon overcoming substantial risks, including but not limited to, risks relating to siting, financing, engineering and construction, permitting, governmental approvals, commissioning delays, supply chain related disruptions to our access to materials, or the potential for termination of the power sales contract as a result of a failure to meet certain milestones. For additional information regarding our projects under construction see Item 1.—Business—Our Organization and Segments included in this Form 10-K.
In certain cases, our subsidiaries may enter into obligations in the development process even though the subsidiariesthey have not yet secured financing, power purchase arrangements,PPAs, or other important elements for a successful project. For example, our subsidiaries may instruct contractors to begin the construction process or seek to procure equipment even where they do not havewithout having financing, a PPA or critical permits in place (or conversely, to enter into a PPA, procurement agreement or other agreement without financing in place)agreed financing). If the project does not proceed, our subsidiaries may remain obligated forretain certain liabilities even though the project will not proceed. Development is inherently uncertain and we may forgo certain development opportunities andliabilities. Furthermore, we may undertake significant development costs before determining that we willand subsequently not proceed with a particular project. We believe that capitalized costs for projects under development are recoverable; however, there can be no assurance that any individual project will be completed and reach commercial operation. If these development efforts are not successful, we may abandon a project under development and writecertain projects, resulting in, writing off the costs incurred, in connection with such project. At the time of abandonment, we would expense allexpensing related capitalized development costs incurred in connection therewith and could incurincurring additional losses associated with any related contingent liabilities.
We do not control certain aspects of our joint ventures.ventures or our equity method investments.
We have invested in some joint ventures in which our subsidiaries share operational, management, investment and/or other control rights with our joint venture partners. In many cases, we may exert influence over the joint venture pursuant to a management contract, by holding positions on the board of the joint venture company or on management committees and/or through certain limited governance rights, such as rights to veto significant actions. However, we do not always have this type of influence over the project or business in every instance and we may be dependent on our joint venture partners or the management team of the joint venture to operate, manage, invest or otherwise control such projects or businesses. Our joint venture partners or the management team of our joint ventures may not have the level of experience, technical expertise, human resources, management and other attributes necessary to operate these projects or businesses optimally, and they may not share our business priorities. In some joint venture agreements in which we do have majority control of the voting securities, we have entered into shareholder agreements granting minority rights to the other shareholders.
The approval of joint venture partners also may be required for us to receive distributions of funds from jointly owned entities or to transfer our interest in projects or businesses. The control or influence exerted by our joint venture partners may result in operational management and/or investment decisions that are different from the decisions our subsidiarieswe would make if they operated independently and could impact the profitability and value of these joint ventures. In addition, in the event thatif a joint venture partner becomes insolvent or bankrupt or is


otherwise unable to meet its obligations to the joint venture or its share of liabilities atfor the joint venture, we may be subject to joint and several liability for these joint ventures, which means that we may be responsible for meeting certain obligations of the joint ventures should our joint venture partner be unable to do so, if and to the extent provided for in our governing documents or applicable law.
Our renewable energyFurther, we have a significant equity method investment in Fluence. As a publicly listed company, Fluence is governed by its own Board of Directors, whose members have fiduciary duties to the Fluence shareholders. While we have certain rights to appoint representatives to the Fluence Board of Directors, the interests of the Fluence


65 | 2021 Annual Report

shareholders, as represented by the Fluence Board of Directors, may not align with our interests or the interests of our securityholders.
In addition, we are generally dependent on the management team of our equity method investments to operate and control such projects or businesses. While we may exert influence pursuant to having positions on the boards of such investments and/or through certain limited governance rights, such as rights to veto significant actions, we do not always have this type of influence and the scope and impact of such influence may be limited. The management teams of our equity method investments may not have the level of experience, technical expertise, human resources, management and other initiatives face considerable uncertainties, including development, operational, and regulatory challenges.
Wind, solar, and energy storage projects are subjectattributes necessary to substantial risks. Some of these business lines are dependent upon favorable regulatory incentives to support continued investment, and there is significant uncertainty about the extent to which such favorable regulatory incentives will be available in the future.
Furthermore, production levels for our wind and solar projects may be dependent upon adequate wind or sunlight resulting in volatility in production levels and profitability. For example, for our wind projects, wind resource estimates are based on historical experience when available and on wind resource studies conducted by an independent engineer. These wind resource estimates are not expected to reflect actual wind energy production in any given year, but long-term averages of a resource.
As a result, these types of renewable energy projects face considerable risk, including the risk that favorable regulatory regimes expire or are adversely modified. In addition, because certain of these projects depend on technology outside of our expertise in generation and utility businesses, there are risks associated with our ability to develop and manage such projects profitably. Furthermore, at the development or acquisition stage, because of our more limited experience with the relevant technologies, our ability to predict actual performance results may be hindered and the projects may not perform as predicted. There are also risks associated with the fact that some of these projects exist in markets where long-term fixed price contracts for the major cost and revenue components may be unavailable, which in turn may result in these projects having relatively high levels of volatility. These projects can be capital-intensive and generally are designed with a view to obtaining third-party financing, which may be difficult to obtain. As a result, these capital constraints may reduce our ability to developoperate these projects or obtain third-party financing for these projects.
Government incentivesbusinesses optimally, and policies that support the development of renewable energy generation projects could change at any time.
AES’ U.S. renewable energy generation growth strategy depends in part on federal, state and local government policies and incentives that support the development, financing, ownership and operation of renewable energy generation projects. These policies and incentives include investment tax credits, production tax credits, accelerated depreciation, renewable portfolio standards, feed-in-tariffs and similar programs, renewable energy credit mechanisms, and tax exemptions. If these policies and incentives are changed or eliminated, or AES is unable to use them, it could result in a material adverse impact on AES’ U.S. renewable growth opportunities, including fewer future PPAs or lower prices for the sale of power in future PPAs, decreased revenues, reduced economic returns on certain project company investments, increased financing costs, and/or difficulty obtaining financing.
Wethey may not be able to attract and retain skilled people,share our business priorities, which could have a material adverse effect on value of such investments as well as our operations.growth, business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may impact our financial results and position.
Our operating successexposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations results primarily from the translation exposure associated with the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as from transaction exposure associated with transactions in currencies other than an entity's functional currency. While the Consolidated Financial Statements are reported in U.S. dollars, the financial statements of several of our subsidiaries outside the U.S. are prepared using the local currency as the functional currency and abilitytranslated into U.S. dollars by applying appropriate exchange rates. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar relative to carry out growth initiatives depends, in part, onthe local currencies where our ability to retain executives and to attract and retain additional qualified personnel who have experienceforeign subsidiaries report could cause significant fluctuations in our industryresults. In addition, while our foreign operations expenses are generally denominated in the same currency as corresponding sales, we have transaction exposure to the extent receipts and expenditures are not denominated in operatingthe subsidiary's functional currency. Moreover, the costs of doing business abroad may increase as a companyresult of adverse exchange rate fluctuations.
We may not be adequately hedged against our exposure to changes in commodity prices or interest rates.
We routinely enter into contracts to hedge a portion of our sizepurchase and complexity, including peoplesale commitments for electricity, fuel requirements and other commodities to lower our financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations. As part of this strategy, we routinely utilize fixed price or indexed forward physical purchase and sales contracts, futures, financial swaps, and option contracts traded in the over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. We also enter into contracts which help us manage our interest rate exposure. However, we may not cover the entire exposure of our assets or positions to market price or interest rate volatility, and the coverage will vary over time. Furthermore, the risk management practices we have in place may not always perform as planned. In particular, if prices of commodities or interest rates significantly deviate from historical prices or interest rates or if the price or interest rate volatility or distribution of these changes deviates from historical norms, our risk management practices may not protect us from significant losses. As a result, fluctuating commodity prices or interest rates may negatively impact our financial results to the extent we have unhedged or inadequately hedged positions. In addition, certain types of economic hedging activities may not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP, resulting in increased volatility in our foreign businesses.net income. The inabilityCompany may also suffer losses associated with "basis risk," which is the difference in performance between the hedge instrument and the underlying exposure (usually the pricing node of the generation facility). Furthermore, there is a risk that the current counterparties to attractthese arrangements may fail or are unable to perform part or all of their obligations under these arrangements, while we seek to protect against that by utilizing strong credit requirements and retain qualified personnelexchange trades, these protections may not fully cover the exposure in the event of a counterparty default. For our businesses with PPA pricing that does not completely pass through our fuel costs, the businesses attempt to manage the exposure through flexible fuel purchasing and timing of entry and terms of our fuel supply agreements; however, these risk management efforts may not be successful and the resulting commodity exposure could have a material adverse effect on our business, because of the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacements. For example, we routinely assess the financial impacts of complicated business transactions that occur on a worldwide basis. These assessments are dependent on hiring personnel on a worldwide basis with sufficient expertise in U.S. GAAP to timely and accurately comply with U.S. reporting obligations. An inability to maintain adequate internal accounting and managerial controls and hire and retain qualified personnel could have an adverse effect on our financial and tax reporting.
Cyber-attacks and data security breaches could harm our business.
Our business is heavily reliant on electronic systems and network technologies to operate our generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure. We also use various financial, accounting and other infrastructure systems. Our infrastructure may be targeted by nation states, hacktivists, criminals, insiders or terrorist groups. Such an attack, by hacking, malware or other means, may interrupt our operations, cause property damage, affect our ability to control our infrastructure assets, cause the release of sensitive customer information or limit


communications with third parties. Any loss or corruption of confidential or proprietary data through such breach may:
impair our reputation;
impact our operations and strategic objectives;
impact our customer and vendor relationships;
result in substantial revenue loss;
expose us to legal claims and/or regulatory investigations and proceedings; and
require extensive repair and restoration costs for additional security measures to avert future cyber-attacks.
In addition, a breach of our financial and accounting systems could impact our ability to correctly record, process and report financial information.
In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we collect and retain sensitive information, including personal identification information about customers and employees, customer energy usage and other information. The theft, damage or improper disclosure of sensitive electronic data can subject us to penalties for violation of applicable privacy laws, subject us to claims from third parties, require compliance with notification and monitoring regulations, and harm our reputation. The EU GDPR recently came into force and applies to the processing of personal information collected from individuals located in the EU. The GDPR creates new compliance obligations and significantly increases fines for noncompliance.
We have implemented measures to help prevent unauthorized access to our systems and facilities, including certain measures to comply with mandatory regulatory reliability standards. To date, cyber-attacks on our business and operations have not had a material impact on these businesses and/or our operations or financial results. We continue to assess potential threats and vulnerabilities and make investments to address them, including global monitoringresults of networks and systems, identifying and implementing new technology, improving user awareness through employee security training, and updating our security policies as well as those for third-party providers. We cannot guarantee the extent to which our security measures will prevent future cyber-attacks and security breaches or that our insurance coverage will adequately cover any losses we may experience.operations.
Our utilities businesses may be negatively affected by a lack of growth orexperience slower growth in the number of customers or in customer usage.
Customer growth and customer usage in our utilities businesses are affected by a number ofexternal factors, outside our control, such asincluding mandated energy efficiency measures, demand side management requirements, and economic and demographic conditions, such as population changes, job and income growth, housing starts, new business formation and the overall level of economic activity. A lack of growth, or a decline, in the number of customers or in customer demand for electricity may cause us to fail to fullynot realize the anticipated benefits from significant investments and expenditures and could have a material adverse effect on our growth, business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.


66 | 2021 Annual Report

Some of our subsidiaries participate in defined benefit pension plans and their net pension plan obligations may require additional significant contributions.
We have 3032 defined benefit plans, five at U.S. subsidiaries and the remaining plans at foreign subsidiaries, which cover substantially all of the employees at these subsidiaries. Pension costs are based upon a number of actuarial assumptions, including an expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the expected life span of pension plan beneficiaries and the discount rate used to determine the present value of future pension obligations. Any of these assumptions could prove to be incorrect, resulting in a shortfall of pension plan assets compared to pension obligations under the pension plan. We periodically evaluate the value of the pension plan assets to ensure that they will be sufficient to fund the respective pension obligations. Our exposure to market volatility is mitigated to some extent due to the fact that the asset allocations in our largest plans include a significant weighting of investments in fixed income securities that are generally less volatile than investments in equity securities. Future downturnsDownturns in the debt and/or equity markets, or the inaccuracy of any of our significant assumptions underlying the estimates of our subsidiaries' pension plan obligations, could result in ana material increase in pension expense and future funding requirements, which may be material.requirements. Our subsidiaries that participate in these plans are responsible for satisfying the funding requirements required by law in their respective jurisdictions for any shortfall of pension plan assets as compared to pension obligations under the pension plan. Satisfying such funding requirementsplan, which may necessitate additional cash contributions to the pension plans that could adversely affect the Parent Companyour and our subsidiaries' liquidity. For additional information regarding the funding position of the Company's pension plans, seeSee Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results


of Operations—Analysis—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Pension and Other Postretirement Plans and Note 13.—15—Benefit Plans included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataincluded in this Form 10-K..
Impairment of goodwill or long-lived assets would negatively impact our consolidated results of operations and net worth.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had approximately $1.1$1.2 billion of goodwill, which represented approximately 3%4% of theour total assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.assets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators are present. We may be required to evaluate the potential impairment of goodwill outside of the required annual evaluation process if we experience situations, including but not limited to:such as: deterioration in general economic conditions or our operating or regulatory environment; increased competitive environment; lower forecasted revenue; increase in fuel costs, particularly whencosts that we are unable to pass through the impact to customers; increase in environmental compliance costs; negative or declining cash flows; loss of a key contract or customer, particularly when we are unable to replace it on equally favorable terms; developments in our strategy; divestiture of a significant component of our business; or adverse actions or assessments by a regulator. For example, during the annual goodwill impairment test performed as of October 1, 2018, the Company determined that the fair value of its Gener reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 7%. Therefore, Gener's $868 million goodwill balance was considered to be "at risk" for impairment as of December 31, 2018 largely due to the fact that a market participant would no longer assume perpetual cash flows from coal-fired power plants due to the increased penetration of renewable energy in Chile. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsKey Trends and Uncertainties—Impairments. These types of events and the resulting analyses could result in goodwill impairment, which could substantially affect our results of operations for those periods.impairment. Additionally, goodwill may be impaired if our acquisitions do not perform as expected. See the risk factor Our acquisitions may not perform as expected for further discussion.
Long-lived assets are initially recorded at fair value, and are amortized or depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Long-lived assetslives, and are evaluated for impairment only when impairment indicators, similar to those described above for goodwill, are present, whereaspresent. Any impairment of goodwill is also evaluated for impairment on an annual basis.
Any of the foregoingor long-lived assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Our acquisitions may not perform as expected.
Historically, acquisitions have been a significant part of our growth strategy. We may continue to grow our business through acquisitions. Although acquired businesses may have significant operating histories, we will have a limited or no history of owning and operating many of these businesses and possibly limited or no experience operating in the country or region where these businesses are located. Some of these businesses may have been government owned and some may be operated as part of a larger integrated utility prior to their acquisition. If we were to acquire any of these types of businesses, there can be no assurance that:
we will be successful in transitioning them to private ownership;
such businesses will perform as expected;
integration or other one-time costs will not be greater than expected;
we will not incur unforeseen obligations or liabilities;
such businesses will generate sufficient cash flow to support the indebtedness incurred to acquire them or the capital expenditures needed to develop them; or
the rate of return from such businesses will justify our decision to invest capital to acquire them.
Risks associated with Governmental Regulation and Laws
Our operations are subject to significant government regulation and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in the law or regulatory schemes.
Our ability to predict, influence or respond appropriately to changes in law or regulatory schemes, including any ability to obtainobtaining expected or contracted increases in electricity tariff or contract rates or tariff adjustments for increased expenses, could adversely impact our results of operations or our ability to meet publicly announced projections or analysts' expectations.operations. Furthermore, changes in laws or regulations or changes in the application or interpretation of regulatory provisions in jurisdictions where we operate, particularly at our utilities where electricity tariffs are subject to regulatory review or approval, could adversely affect our business, including, but not limited to:including:


changes in the determination, definition or classification of costs to be included as reimbursable or pass-through costs to be included in the rates we charge our customers, including but not limited to costs incurred to upgrade our power plants to comply with more stringent environmental regulations;
changes in the determination of what is an appropriate rate of return on invested capital or a determination that a utility's operating income or the rates it charges customers are too high, resulting in a rate reduction of rates or consumer rebates;
changes in the definition or determination of controllable or non-controllable costs;
adverse changes in tax law;
changes in law or regulation whichthat limit or otherwise affect the ability of our counterparties (including sovereign or private parties) to fulfill their obligations (including payment obligations) to us or our subsidiaries;us;


67 | 2021 Annual Report

changes in environmental law whichthat impose additional costs or limit the dispatch of our generating facilities within our subsidiaries;facilities;
changes in the definition of events which may or may notthat qualify as changes in economic equilibrium;
changes in the timing of tariff increases;
other changes in the regulatory determinations under the relevant concessions;
other changes related to licensing or permitting which affect our ability to conduct business; or
other changes that impact the short- or long-term price-setting mechanism in the markets where we operate.our markets.
Any of the above events may resultFurthermore, in lower operating margins for the affected businesses, which can adversely affect our business.
In many countries where we conduct business, the regulatory environment is constantly changing and it may be difficult to predict the impact of the regulations on our businesses. The impacts described above could also result from our (or our subsidiaries') efforts to comply with European Market Infrastructure Regulation, which includes regulations related to the trading, reporting and clearing of derivatives. It is also possible that additionalderivatives and similar regulations may be passed in other jurisdictions where we conduct business. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on the Company.above events may result in lower operating margins and financial results for the affected businesses.
Several of our businesses are subject to potentially significant remediation expenses, enforcement initiatives, private party lawsuits and reputational risk associated with CCR.
CCR which consists of bottom ash, fly ash and air pollution control wastes generated at our current and former coal-fired generation plant sites, is currently handled and/or has been handled in the past in the following ways:by: placement in onsite CCR ponds; disposal and beneficial use in onsite and offsite permitted, engineered landfills; use in various beneficial use applications, including encapsulated uses and structural fill; and used in permitted offsite mine reclamation. CCR currently remains onsite at several of our facilities, including in CCR ponds. The U.S. EPA's final CCR rule which became effective in October 2015, regulates CCR as nonhazardous solid waste and establishes national minimum criteria for existing and new CCR landfills and existing and new CCR ponds, including location restrictions, design and operating criteria, groundwater monitoring, corrective action and closure requirements and post-closure care. On December 16, 2016, President Obama signed the WIN Act into law, which includes provisions to implement the CCR rule through a state permitting program, or if the state chooses not to participate, a possible federal permit program. The primaryprovides that enforcement mechanisms under this regulation couldactions can be actions commenced by U.S.the EPA, states, or territories, and private lawsuits. Compliance with the U.S. federal CCR rule; amendments to the federal CCR rule; or federal, state, territory, or foreign rules or programs addressing CCR may require us to incur substantial costs. In addition, the Company and our businesses may face CCR-related lawsuits in the United States and/or internationally that may expose us to unexpected potential liabilities. Furthermore, CCR-related litigation may also expose us to unexpected costs. In addition, CCR, and its production at several of our facilities, have been the subject of significant interest from environmental non-governmental organizations and have received national and local media attention. The direct and indirect effects of such media attention, and the demands of responding to and addressing it, may divert management time and attention. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects.


Our business in the United States isSome of our U.S. businesses are subject to the provisions of various laws and regulations administered in whole or in part by FERC and NERC, including PURPA, the Federal Power Act, and the EPAct 2005. Actions by FERC, NERC and by state utility commissions that can have a material effect on our operations.
The AES Corporation is a registered electric holding company under the PUHCA 2005 PUHCA as enacted as part of the EPAct 2005. PUHCA 2005 eliminated many of the restrictions that had been in place under the U.S. Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, PUCHA, while continuing to provide FERC and state utility commissions with enhanced access to the books and records of certain utility holding companies. PUHCA 2005 also creates additional potential challenges and opportunities. By removing some barriers to mergers and other potential combinations, the creation of large, geographically dispersed utility holding companies is more likely. These entities may have enhanced financial strength and therefore an increased ability to compete with us in the U.S. market.U.S..
Other parts of the EPAct 2005 allow FERC to remove the PURPA purchase/sale obligations from utilities if there are adequate opportunities to sell into competitive markets. FERC has exercised this power with a rebuttable presumption that utilities located within the control areas of MISO, PJM, ISO New England, Inc., the New York Independent System Operator, Inc., and ERCOT are not required to purchase or sell power from or to QFs above a certain size. Additionally, FERC has the power to remove the purchase/sale obligations of individual utilities on a case-by-case basis. While these changes do not affect existing contracts, certain of our QFs that have had sales contracts expire are now facing a more difficult market environment and that is likely to continue for other AES QFs with existing contracts that will expire over time.
In accordance with Congressional mandates in the EPAct 1992 and the EPAct 2005, FERC has strongly encouragedencourages competition in wholesale electric markets. Increased competition may have the effect of lowering our operating margins. Among other steps, FERC has encouraged RTOs and ISOs to develop demand response bidding programs as a mechanism for responding to peak electric demand. These programs may reduce the value of generation assets. Similarly, FERC is encouraging the construction of new transmission


68 | 2021 Annual Report

infrastructure in accordance with provisions of EPAct 2005. Although new transmission lines may increase market opportunities, they may also increase the competition in our existing markets.
FERC has civil penalty authority over violations of any provision of Part II of the FPA, which concerns wholesale generation or transmission, as well as any rule or order issued thereunder. The FPA also provides for the assessment of criminal fines and imprisonment for violations under the FPA. This penalty authority was enhanced in EPAct 2005. As a result, FERC is authorized to assess a maximum penalty authority established by statute and such penalty authority has been and will continue to be adjusted periodically to account for inflation. With this expanded enforcement authority, violations of the FPA and FERC's regulations could potentially have more serious consequences than in the past.
Pursuant to EPAct 2005, the NERC has been certified by FERC as the Electric Reliability Organization ("ERO")ERO to develop mandatory and enforceable electric system reliability standards applicable throughout the U.S. to improve the overall reliability of the electric grid. These standards are subject to FERC review and approval. Once approved, the reliability standards may be enforced by FERC independently, or, alternatively, by the ERO and regional reliability organizations with responsibility for auditing, investigating and otherwise ensuring compliance with reliability standards, subject to FERC oversight. Violations of NERC reliability standards are subject to FERC's penalty authority under the FPA and EPAct 2005.
Our U.S. utility businesses in the U.S. face significant regulation by their respective state utility commissions. The regulatory discretion is reasonably broad in both Indiana and Ohio and includes regulation as to services and facilities, the valuation of property, the construction, purchase, or lease of electric generating facilities, the classification of accounts, rates of depreciation, the increase or decrease in retail rates and charges, the issuance of certain securities, the acquisition and sale of some public utility properties or securities and certain other matters. These businesses face the risk of unexpected or adverse regulatory action which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. See Item 1.Business—US SBU—U.S. Businesses—U.S.and Utilities SBU for further information on the regulation faced by our U.S. utilities..
Our businesses are subject to stringent environmental laws, rules and regulations.
Our businesses are subject to stringent environmental laws and regulations by many federal, regional, state and local authorities, international treaties and foreign governmental authorities. These laws and regulations generally concern emissions into the air, effluents into the water, use of water, wetlands preservation, remediation of contamination, waste disposal, endangered species and noise regulation. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations or to obtain or comply with any associated environmental permits could result in fines or other sanctions. For example, in recent years, the EPA has issued notices of violation (NOVs)NOVs to a number of coal-fired


generating plants alleging wide-spread violations of the new source review and prevention of significant deterioration provisions of the CAA. The EPA has brought suit against and obtained settlements with many companies for allegedly making major modifications to a coal-fired generating units without proper permit approvals and without installing best available control technology. The primary focus of these NOVs has been emissions of SO2 and NOx and the EPA has imposed fines and required companies to install improved pollution control technologies to reduce such emissions. In addition, state regulatory agencies and non-governmental environmental organizations have pursued civil lawsuits against power plants in situations that have resulted in judgments and/or settlements requiring the installation of expensive pollution controls or the accelerated retirement of certain electric generating units.
Furthermore,Congress and other domestic and foreign governmental authorities have either considered or implemented various laws and regulations to restrict or tax certain emissions, particularly those involving air emissions and water discharges. These laws and regulations have imposed, and proposed laws and regulations could impose in the future, additional costs on the operation of our power plants. See the various descriptions of these laws and regulations contained in Item 1.—Business—Environmental and Land-Use Regulations of this Form 10-K..
We have incurred and will continue to incur significant capital and other expenditures to comply with these and other environmental laws and regulations. Changes in, or new development of, environmental restrictions may force us to incur significant expenses or expenses that may exceed our estimates. There can be no assurance that we would be able to recover all or any increased environmental costs from our customers or that our business, financial condition, including recorded asset values or results of operations, would not be materially and adversely affected by such expenditures or any changes in domestic or foreign environmental laws and regulations.affected.


69 | 2021 Annual Report

Concerns about GHG emissions and the potential risks associated with climate change have led to increased regulation and other actions that could impact our businesses.
International, federal and various regional and state authorities regulate GHG emissions and have created financial incentives to reduce them. In 2018,2021, the Company's subsidiaries operated businesses that had total CO2 emissions of approximately 5547 million metric tonnes, approximately 2316 million of which were emitted by our U.S. businesses (both figures are ownership adjusted). The Company uses CO2 emission estimation methodologies supported by "The Greenhouse Gas Protocol" reporting standard on GHG emissions. For existing power generation plants, CO2 emissions data are either obtained directly from plant continuous emission monitoring systems or calculated from actual fuel heat inputs and fuel type CO2 emission factors. The estimated annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric power generation facilities of the Company's subsidiaries that are in construction or development and have received the necessary air permits for commercial operations are approximately 74 million metric tonnes (ownership adjusted). This overall estimate is based on a number of projections and assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, such as the forecasted dispatch, anticipated plant efficiency, fuel type, CO2 emissions rates and our subsidiaries' achieving completion of such construction and development projects. However, it is certain thatWhile actual emissions may vary substantially; the projects under construction or development when completed will increase emissions of our portfolio and therefore could increase the risks associated with regulation of GHG emissions. Because there is significant uncertainty regarding these estimates, actual emissions from these projects under construction or development may vary substantially from these estimates.
There currently is no U.S. federal legislation imposing mandatory GHG emission reductions (including for CO2) that affects our electric power generation facilities; however, in 2015, the EPA promulgated a rule establishing New Source Performance Standards for CO2 emissions for newly constructed and modified/reconstructed fossil-fueled EUSGUselectric utility steam generating units larger than 25 MW. AlsoMW and in 2015,2018 proposed revisions to the rule. In 2019, the EPA promulgated the Affordable Clean Power Plan (CPP),Energy (ACE) Rule which requires interimestablishes heat rate improvement measures as the best system of emissions reductions for existing coal-fired electric generating units. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded to EPA the ACE Rule although the parties have the opportunity to request a rehearing at the D.C. Circuit or seek a review of the decision by preexisting EUSGUs beginning in 2022, with full compliance achieved by 2030. These actions have been challenged in courtthe U.S. Supreme Court. The impact of this decision and potential new or revised rules from the current Administration has announced plans to significantly amend or rescind the rules.remains uncertain. In 2016,2010, the EPA adopted regulations pertaining to GHG emissions that require new and existing sources of GHG emissions to potentially obtain new source review permits from the EPA prior to construction or modification, butmodification. In 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that such permitting would only be required if such sources also must obtain a new source review permit for increases in other regulated pollutants.
For further discussion of the regulation of GHG emissions, including the U.S. Supreme Court's issued order staying implementation of the CPP, and the EPA's proposal to rescind the CPP, see Item 1.Business—Environmental and Land-Use Regulations—United StatesU.S. Environmental and Land-Use Legislation and Regulations—Greenhouse Gas Emissions above.
In December 2015, the The Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change convened for the 21st Conference of the Parties and the resultingChange's Paris Agreement established a long-term goal of keeping the


increase in global average temperature well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. We anticipate that the Paris Agreement will continue the trend toward efforts to de-carbonizedecarbonize the global economy and to further limit GHG emissions.
The impact of GHG regulation on our operations will depend on a number of factors, including among others, the degree and timing of GHG emissions reductions required under any such legislation or regulation, the cost of emissions reduction equipment and the price and availability of offsets, the extent to which market based compliance options are available, the extent to which our subsidiaries would be entitled to receive GHG emissions allowances without having to purchase them in an auction or on the open market and the impact of such legislation or regulation on the ability of our subsidiaries to recover costs incurred through rate increases or otherwise. The costs of compliance could be substantial.
Our non-utility, generation subsidiaries seek to pass on any costs arising from CO2 emissions to contract counterparties. Likewise, our utility subsidiaries seek to pass on any costs arising from CO2 emissions to customers. However, there can be no assurance that we will effectively pass such costs onto the contract counterparties or customers, respectively, or that the cost and burden associated with any dispute over which party bears such costs would not be burdensome and costly.
Furthermore, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, physical risks from climate change could include, but are not limited to, increased runoff and earlier spring peak discharge in many glacier and snow-fed rivers, warming of lakes and rivers, an increase in sea level, and changes and variability in precipitation and in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events. Physical impacts may have the potential to significantly affect our business and operations. For example, extreme weather events could result in increased downtime and operation and maintenance costs at our electric power transmission and distribution assets and facilities. Variations in weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity, would also be expected to affect the energy needs of customers. A decrease in energy consumption could decrease our revenues. In addition, while revenues would be


70 | 2021 Annual Report

expected to increase if the energy consumption of customers increased, such increase could prompt the need for additional investment in generation capacity.
In addition to government regulators, many groups, , including politicians, environmentalists, the investor community and other private parties have expressed increasing concern about GHG emissions. New regulation, such as the initiatives in Chile, Hawaii, and the Puerto Rico Energy Public Policy Act, may adversely affect our operations. See Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Decarbonization Initiatives. Responding to these decarbonization initiatives, including developments in our strategy in line with these initiatives may present challenges to our business. We may be unable to develop our renewables platform as quickly as anticipated. Further, we may be unable to dispose of coal-fired generation assets at anticipated prices, the estimated useful lives of these assets may decrease, and the value of such assets may be impaired. These initiatives could also result in the early retirement of coal-fired generation facilities, which could result in stranded costs if regulators disallow full recovery of investments.
Negative public perception of our GHG emissions could have an adverse effect on our relationships with third parties, our ability to attract additional customers, or our business development opportunities. opportunities, and our ability to access finance and insurance for our coal-fired generation assets.
In addition, plaintiffs previously brought tort lawsuits that were dismissed against the Company because of its subsidiaries' GHG emissions. While these lawsuits were dismissed, futureFuture similar lawsuits may prevail or result in damages awards or other relief. We may also be subject to risks associated with the impact on weather conditions. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors—Certain of our businesses are sensitive to variations in weather and hydrologyand Severe weather and natural disasters may present significant risks to our business and adversely affect our financial results within this section for more information.
information. If any of the foregoing risks materialize, costs may increase or revenues may decrease and there could be a material adverse effect on our electric power generation businesses and on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition,cash flows and reputation.
Concerns about data privacy have led to increased regulation and other actions that could impact our businesses.
In the ordinary course of business, we collect and retain sensitive information, including personal identifiable information about customers, employees, customer energy usage and other information as well as information regarding business partners and other third parties, some of which may constitute confidential information. The theft, damage or improper disclosure of sensitive electronic data collected by us can subject us to penalties for violation of applicable privacy laws, subject us to claims from third parties, require compliance with notification and monitoring regulations, and harm our reputation. Although we maintain technical and organizational measures to protect personal identifiable information and other confidential information, breaches of, or disruptions to, our information technology systems could result in legal claims, liability or penalties under privacy laws or damage to operations or to the company's reputation, which could adversely affect our business.
We are also subject to various data privacy and security laws and regulations globally, as well as contractual requirements, as a result of having access to and processing confidential and personal identifiable information in the course of business. If we are unable to comply with applicable laws and regulations or with our contractual commitments, as well as maintain reliable information technology systems and appropriate controls with respect to privacy and security requirements, we may suffer regulatory consequences that could be costly or otherwise adversely affect our business. In addition, any actual or perceived failure on the part of one of our equity affiliates could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and prospects.
Tax legislation initiatives or challenges to our tax positions could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.us.
Our subsidiaries have operationsWe operate in the U.S. and various non-U.S. jurisdictions. As such, wejurisdictions and are subject to the tax laws and regulations of the U.S. federal, state and local governments and of many non-U.S. jurisdictions. From time to time, legislative measures may be enacted that could adversely affect our overall tax positions regarding income or other taxes. There can be no assurance that our effective tax rate or tax payments will not be adversely affected by these legislative measures.
The TCJA enacted December 22, 2017 introduced significant changes to current U.S. federal tax law, including but not limited to lowering the corporate income tax rate, introducing new limits on interest expense deductibility, and changing the way in which foreign earnings are taxed. These changes are complex and are subject to additional guidance to be issued by the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, the reaction to the federal tax changes by the individual states is evolving. Our interpretations and assumptions around U.S. tax reform may evolve in future periods as further administrative guidance and regulations are issued, which may materially affecttaxes, our effective tax rate or tax payments. For further details, please seeexample, in the third quarter of 2021, both the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives passed $3.5 trillion budget resolutions as a first step to the budget reconciliation process that could include U.S. corporate and international tax reforms. As part of the reconciliation process, the House Ways and Means Committee marked up a version of the “Build Back Better Act”. The Build Back Better Act included U.S. corporate and international tax reform proposals that would increase the U.S. corporate income tax rate, modify the Global Intangible Low Taxed Income rules, create additional interest deduction limitations and provide clean energy incentives, among others. The Company believes it would benefit


71 | 2021 Annual Report

from the clean energy initiatives, though the tax implications may be unfavorable in the short term. As of the filing date, the Build Back Better Act had not been voted on in the United States Senate.
With respect to international tax reform, in the third quarter of 2021,132 member countries of the OECD “Inclusive Framework” group released a statement announcing a coordinated framework that would reallocate taxing rights over the profits of multinational corporations and establish a global minimum tax at a 15% rate. On December 20, 2021 the OECD released a set of Model Rules related to the so-called Pillar 2 global minimum tax known as the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE). On December 22, 2021, the European Commission proposed a draft Directive establishing a global minimum level of taxation. The proposal, if approved by all 27 EU Member States, would require each Member State to transpose the Directive into their respective national laws by December 31, 2022 for the Income Inclusion Rule to come into effect as of January 1, 2023 and the Under Taxed Payments Rule to come into effect January 1, 2024. The Subject to Tax Rule was excluded from the draft Directive. These Rules, collectively, comprise the main facets of the GloBE. The potential impact to the Company is not known, but may be material. Implementation of the framework would require multilateral agreement and/or country specific legislative action, including in the U.S.
Risks Related to our Indebtedness and Financial Condition
We have a significant amount of debt.
As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately $19 billion of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis. All outstanding borrowings under The AES Corporation's revolving credit facility are unsecured. Most of the debt of The AES Corporation's subsidiaries, however, is secured by substantially all of the assets of those subsidiaries. A substantial portion of cash flow from operations must be used to make payments on our debt. Furthermore, since a significant percentage of our assets are used to secure this debt, this reduces the amount of collateral available for future secured debt or credit support and reduces our flexibility in operating these secured assets. This level of indebtedness and related security could have other consequences, including:
making it more difficult to satisfy debt service and other obligations;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse industry and economic conditions, including adverse changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices;
reducing available cash flow to fund other corporate purposes and grow our business;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors that are not as highly leveraged; and
limiting, along with financial and other restrictive covenants relating to such indebtedness, our ability to borrow additional funds, pay cash dividends or repurchase common stock.
The agreements governing our indebtedness, including the indebtedness of our subsidiaries, limit, but do not prohibit the incurrence of additional indebtedness. If we were to become more leveraged, the risks described above would increase. Further, our actual cash requirements may be greater than expected and our cash flows may not be sufficient to repay all of the outstanding debt as it becomes due. In that event, we may not be able to borrow money, sell assets, raise equity or otherwise raise funds on acceptable terms to refinance our debt as it becomes due. In addition, our ability to refinance existing or future indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at that time. Any refinancing of our debt could result in higher interest rates or more onerous covenants that restrict our business operations. See Note 11Debt included in Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for a schedule of our debt maturities.
The AES Corporation's ability to make payments on its outstanding indebtedness is dependent upon the receipt of funds from our subsidiaries.
The AES Corporation is a holding company with no material assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries. Almost all of The AES Corporation's cash flow is generated by the operating activities of its subsidiaries. Therefore, The AES Corporation's ability to make payments on its indebtedness and to fund its other obligations is dependent not only on the ability of its subsidiaries to generate cash, but also on the ability of the subsidiaries to distribute cash to it in the form of dividends, fees, interest, tax sharing payments, loans or otherwise.Our subsidiaries face various restrictions in their ability to distribute cash. Most of the subsidiaries are obligated, pursuant to loan agreements, indentures or non-recourse financing arrangements, to satisfy certain restricted payment covenants or other conditions before they may make distributions. Business performance and local accounting and tax rules may also limit dividend distributions. Subsidiaries in foreign countries may also be prevented from distributing funds as a


72 | 2021 Annual Report

result of foreign governments restricting the repatriation of funds or the conversion of currencies. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and, unless they have expressly guaranteed The AES Corporation's indebtedness, have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to such debt or to make any funds available whether by dividends, fees, loans or other payments.
Existing and potential future defaults by subsidiaries or affiliates could adversely affect us.
We attempt to finance our domestic and foreign projects through non-recourse debt or "non-recourse financing" that requires the loans to be repaid solely from the project's revenues and provide that the repayment of the loans (and interest thereon) is secured solely by the capital stock, physical assets, contracts and cash flow of that project subsidiary or affiliate. As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately $19 billion of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis, of which approximately $3.8 billion was recourse debt of the Parent Company and approximately $14.8 billion was non-recourse debt. In some non-recourse financings, the Parent Company has explicitly agreed, in the form of guarantees, indemnities, letters of credit, letter of credit reimbursement agreements and agreements to pay, to undertake certain limited obligations and contingent liabilities, most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events.
Certain of our subsidiaries are in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness. The total debt classified as current in our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to such defaults was $237 million as of December 31, 2021. While the lenders under our non-recourse financings generally do not have direct recourse to the Parent Company, such defaults under non-recourse financings can:
reduce the Parent Company's receipt of subsidiary dividends, fees, interest payments, loans and other sources of cash because a subsidiary will typically be prohibited from distributing cash to the Parent Company during the pendency of any default;
trigger The AES Corporation's obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee, letter of credit or other credit support provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary;
trigger defaults in the Parent Company's outstanding debt. For example, The AES Corporation's revolving credit facility and outstanding senior notes include events of default for certain bankruptcy related events involving material subsidiaries and relating to accelerations of outstanding material debt of material subsidiaries or any subsidiaries that in the aggregate constitute a material subsidiary; or
result in foreclosure on the assets that are pledged under the non-recourse financings, resulting in write-downs of assets and eliminating any and all potential future benefits derived from those assets.
None of the projects that are in default are owned by subsidiaries that, individually or in the aggregate, meet the applicable standard of materiality in The AES Corporation's revolving credit facility or other debt agreements to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under such indebtedness. However, as a result of future mix of distributions, write-down of assets, dispositions and other changes to our financial position and results of operations, one or more of these subsidiaries, individually or in the aggregate, could fall within the applicable standard of materiality and thereby upon an acceleration of such subsidiary's debt, trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of Parent Company indebtedness.
The AES Corporation has significant cash requirements and limited sources of liquidity.
The AES Corporation requires cash primarily to fund: principal repayments of debt, interest, dividends on our common stock, acquisitions, construction and other project commitments, other equity commitments (including business development investments); equity repurchases; taxes and Parent Company overhead costs. Our principal sources of liquidity are: dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries, proceeds from financings at the Parent Company, and proceeds from asset sales. See Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis —Capital Resources and Liquidity. We believe that these sources will be adequate to meet our obligations for the foreseeable future, based on a number of material assumptions about access the capital or commercial lending markets, the operating and financial performance of our subsidiaries, exchange rates, our ability to sell assets, and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends and other distributions; however, there can be no assurance that these sources will be available when needed or that our actual cash requirements will not be greater than expected. In addition, our cash flow may not be sufficient to repay our debt obligations at maturity and we may have to refinance such obligations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such refinancing on acceptable terms.


73 | 2021 Annual Report

Our ability to grow our business depends on our ability to raise capital on favorable terms.
We rely on the capital markets as a source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows. Our ability to arrange for financing on either a recourse or non-recourse basis and the costs of such capital are dependent on numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control, including: general economic and capital market conditions; the availability of bank credit; the availability of tax equity partners; the financial condition, performance and prospects of AES as well as our competitors; and changes in tax and securities laws. Should access to capital not be available to us, we may have to sell assets or cease further investments, including the expansion or improvement of existing facilities, any of which would affect our future growth.
A downgrade in the credit ratings of The AES Corporation or its subsidiaries could adversely affect our access to the capital markets, interest expense, liquidity or cash flow.
If any of the credit ratings of the The AES Corporation and its subsidiaries were to be downgraded, our ability to raise capital on favorable terms could be impaired and our borrowing costs could increase. Furthermore, counterparties may no longer be willing to accept general unsecured commitments by The AES Corporation to provide credit support. Accordingly, we may be required to provide some other form of assurance, such as a letter of credit and/or collateral, to backstop or replace any credit support by The AES Corporation, which reduces our available credit. There can be no assurance that counterparties will accept such guarantees or other assurances.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price and trading volumes of our common stock could fluctuate substantially due to factors including general economic conditions, conditions in our industry and our markets, environmental and economic developments, and general credit and capital markets conditions, as well as developments specific to us, including risks described in this section, failing to meet our publicly announced guidance or key trends and other matters described in Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Trends and UncertaintiesOperations in this Form 10-K..
Additionally, longstanding international tax norms that determine how and where cross-border international trade is subjected to tax are evolving. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, in coordination with the G8 and G20, through its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project introduced a series of recommendations that many tax jurisdictions have adopted, or may adopt in the future, as law. As these and other tax laws, related regulations and double-tax conventions change, our financial results could be materially impacted. Given the unpredictability of these possible changes and their potential interdependency, it is very difficult to assess whether the overall effect of such potential tax changes would be cumulatively positive or negative for our earnings and cash flow, but such changes could adversely impact our results of operations.
U.S. federal, state and local, as well as non-U.S., tax laws and regulations are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. There can be no assurance that our tax positions will be sustained if challenged by relevant tax authorities and if not sustained, there could be a material impact on our results of operations.


We and our affiliates are subject to material litigation and regulatory proceedings.
We and our affiliates are parties to material litigation and regulatory proceedings. See Item 3.—Legal Proceedings below. There can be no assurances that the outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We maintain offices in many places around the world, generally pursuant to the provisions of long- and short-term leases, none of which we believe are material. With a few exceptions, our facilities, which are described in Item 1Business of this Form 10-K, are subject to mortgages or other liens or encumbrances as part of the project's related finance facility. In addition, the majority of our facilities are located on land that is leased. However, in a few instances, no accompanying project financing exists for the facility, and in a few of these cases, the land interest may not be subject to any encumbrance and is owned outright by the subsidiary or affiliate.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in certain claims, suits and legal proceedings in the normal course of business. The Company has accrued for litigation and claims when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes, based upon information it currently possesses and taking into account established reserves for estimated liabilities and its insurance coverage, that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings and actions is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. It is reasonably possible, however, that some matters could be decided unfavorably to the Company and could require the Company to pay damages or make expenditures in amounts that could be material, but that cannot be estimated as of December 31, 2018.2021.
In December 2001, Grid Corporation of Odisha (“GRIDCO”) served a notice to arbitrate pursuant to the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on the Company, AES Orissa Distribution Private Limited (“AES ODPL”), and Jyoti Structures (“Jyoti”) pursuant to the terms of the shareholders agreement between GRIDCO, the Company, AES ODPL, Jyoti and the Central Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Ltd. (“CESCO”), an affiliate of the Company. In the arbitration, GRIDCO asserted that a comfort letter issued by the Company in connection with the Company's indirect investment in CESCO obligates the Company to provide additional financial support to cover all of CESCO's financial obligations to GRIDCO. GRIDCO appeared to be seeking approximately $189 million in damages, plus undisclosed penalties and interest, but a detailed alleged damage analysis was not filed by GRIDCO. The Company counterclaimed against GRIDCO for damages. In June 2007, a 2-to-1 majority of the arbitral tribunal rendered its award rejecting GRIDCO's claims and holding that none of the respondents, the Company, AES ODPL, or Jyoti, had


74 | 2021 Annual Report

any liability to GRIDCO. The respondents' counterclaims were also rejected. A majority of the tribunal later awarded the respondents, including the Company, some of their costs relating to the arbitration. GRIDCO filed challenges of the tribunal's awards with the local Indian court. GRIDCO's challenge of the costs award has been dismissed by the court, but its challenge of the liability award remains pending. A hearing on the liability award has not taken place to date. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it and will defend itself vigorously in these proceedings; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
Pursuant to their environmental audit, AES Sul and AES Florestal discovered 200 barrels of solid creosote waste and other contaminants at a pole factory that AES Florestal had been operating. The conclusion of the audit was that a prior operator of the pole factory, Companhia Estadual de Energia (“CEEE”), had been using those contaminants to treat the poles that were manufactured at the factory. On their initiative, AES Sul and AES Florestal communicated with Brazilian authorities and CEEE about the adoption of containment and remediation measures. In March 2008, the State Attorney of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil filed a public civil action against AES Sul, AES Florestal and CEEE seeking an order requiring the companies to mitigate the contaminated area located on the grounds of the pole factory and an indemnity payment of approximately R$6 million ($21 million). In October 2011, the State Attorney filed a request for an injunction ordering the defendant companies to contain and remove the contamination immediately. The court granted injunctive relief on October 18, 2011, but determined that only CEEE was required to perform the removal work. In May 2012, CEEE began the removal work in compliance with the injunction. The case is now awaiting judgment. The removal and remediation costs are estimated to be approximately R$2910 million to R$41 million ($82 million to $7 million), and there could be additional remediation costs which cannot be estimated at this time. In June 2016, the Company sold AES Sul to CPFL Energia S.A. and as part of the sale, AES Guaiba, a holding Companycompany of AES Sul, retained the potential liability relating to this matter. The Company believes that there are meritorious


defenses to the claims asserted against it and will defend itself vigorously in these proceedings; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
In January 2012, the Brazil Federal Tax Authority issued an assessment alleging that AES Tietê had paid PIS and COFINS taxes from 2007 to 2010 at a lower rate than the tax authority believed was applicable. AES Tietê challenged the assessment on the grounds that the tax rate was set in the applicable legislation. In April 2013, the FIAC determined that AES Tietê should have calculated the taxes at the higher rate and that AES Tietê was liable for unpaid taxes, interest, and penalties totaling approximately R$1.21 billion ($312 million) as estimated by AES Tietê. AES Tietê appealed to the SIAC. In January 2015, the Second Instance Administrative Court ("SIAC") issued a decision in AES Tietê's favor, finding that AES Tietê was not liable for unpaid taxes. The public prosecutor subsequently filed an appeal, which was denied as untimely. The Tax Authority thereafter filed a motion for clarification of the SIAC's decision, which was denied in September 2016. The Tax Authority later filed a special appeal (“Special Appeal”), which was rejected as untimely in October 2016. The Tax Authority thereafter filed an interlocutory appeal with the Superior Administrative Court (“SAC”). In March 2017, the President of the SAC determined that the SAC would analyze the Special Appeal. AES Tietê challenged the Special Appeal. In May 2018, the SAC rejected the Special Appeal on the merits. In August 2018, the Tax Authority filed a motion for clarification. AES Tietê believes it has meritorious defenses to the claim and will defend itself vigorously in these proceedings; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
In January 2015, DPL received NOVs from the EPA alleging violations of opacity at Stuart and Killen Stations, and in October 2015, IPL received a similar NOV alleging violations at Petersburg Station. In February 2017, the EPA issued a second NOV for DPL Stuart Station, alleging violations of opacity in 2016. Moreover,On May 31, 2018, Stuart Station was retired, and on December 20, 2019, it was transferred to an unaffiliated third-party purchaser, along with the associated environmental liabilities.
In October 2015, AES Indiana received a similar NOV alleging violations at Petersburg Station. In addition, in February 2016, IPLAES Indiana received an NOV from the EPA alleging violations of NSR and other CAA regulations, the Indiana SIP, and the Title V operating permit at Petersburg Station. It is too earlyOn August 31, 2020, AES Indiana reached a settlement with the EPA, the DOJ and IDEM, resolving these purported violations of the CAA at Petersburg Station. The settlement agreement, in the form of a proposed judicial consent decree, was approved and entered by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on March 23, 2021, and includes, among other items, the following requirements: annual caps on NOx and SO2 emissions and more stringent emissions limits than AES Indiana's current Title V air permit; payment of civil penalties totaling $1.5 million; a $5 million environmental mitigation project consisting of the construction and operation of a new, non-emitting source of generation at the site; expenditure of $0.3 million on a state-only environmentally beneficial project to determine whetherpreserve local, ecologically-significant lands; and retirement of Units 1 and 2 prior to July 1, 2023. If AES Indiana does not meet the NOVs could haveretirement obligation, it must install a material impactSelective Non-Catalytic Reduction System on our business, financial condition or results of our operations. IPL would seek recovery of any operating or capital expenditures, but not fines or penalties, related to air pollution control technology to reduce regulated air emissions; however, there can be no assurances that we would be successful in this regard.Unit 4.
In September 2015, AES Southland Development, LLC and AES Redondo Beach, LLC filed a lawsuit against the California Coastal Commission (the “CCC”) over the CCC's determination that the site of AES Redondo Beach included approximately 5.93 acres of CCC-jurisdictional wetlands. The CCC has asserted that AES Redondo Beach has improperly installed and operated water pumps affecting the alleged wetlands in violation of the California Coastal Act and Redondo Beach Local Coastal Program and has ordered AES Redondo Beach to restore the site. Additional potentialProgram. Potential outcomes of the CCC determination could include an order requiring AES Redondo Beach to fundperform a wetland mitigation projectrestoration and/or pay fines or penalties. AES Redondo Beach believes that it has meritorious arguments and intends to vigorously prosecute such lawsuit,concerning the underlying CCC determination, but there can be no assurances that it will be successful.
In October 2015, Ganadera Guerra, S.A. On March 27, 2020, AES Redondo Beach, LLC sold the site to an unaffiliated third-party purchaser that assumed the obligations contained within these proceedings. On May 26, 2020, CCC staff sent AES a Notice of Violation (NOV) directing AES to submit a Coastal Development Permit (“GG”CDP”) and Constructora Tymsa, S.A. (“CT”) filed separate lawsuits against AES Panama inapplication for the local courts of Panama. The claimants allege that AES Panama profited from a hydropower facility (La Estrella) being partially located on land owned initially by GG and currently by CT, and that AES Panama must pay compensation for its useremoval of the land.water pumps within the alleged wetlands. AES has submitted the CDP to the permitting authority, the City of Redondo Beach (“the City”), with respect to AES’s plans to disable or remove the pumps. The damages sought fromNOV also directed AES Panama are approximately $685 million (GG)to submit technical analysis regarding additional water pumps located within onsite electrical vaults and $100 million (CT). Ina CDP application for their continued operation. AES has responded to the CCC, providing the requested analysis and seeking further discussion with the agency regarding the CDP. On October 2016,14, 2020, the court dismissed GG's claim because of GG's failureCity deemed the CDP application to comply withbe complete and indicated a court order requiring GG to disclose certain information. GG has refiled its lawsuit. Also, there are ongoing administrative proceedings concerning whether AES Panama is entitled to acquire an easement over the land and whether AES Panama can continue to occupy the land. AES Panama believes it has meritorious defenses and claims and will assert them vigorously; however, there can be no assurances that itpublic hearing will be successful in its efforts.required, at which


75 | 2021 Annual Report

time AES must present additional information and analysis on the pumps within the alleged wetlands and the onsite electrical vaults.
In January 2017, the Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (“SMA”) issued a Formulation of Charges asserting that Alto Maipo is in violation of certain conditions of the Environmental Approval Resolution (“RCA”) governing the construction of Alto Maipo’s hydropower project, for, among other things, operating vehicles at unauthorized times and failing to mitigate the impact of water infiltration during tunnel construction (“Infiltration Water”). In February 2017, Alto Maipo submitted a compliance plan (“Compliance Plan”) to the SMA which, if approved by the agency, would resolve the matter without materially impacting construction of the project. Thereafter, the SMA made three separate requests for information about the Compliance Plan, to which Alto Maipo duly responded. In April 2018, the SMA approved the Compliance Plan (“April 2018 Approval”). Among other things, the Compliance Plan as approved by the SMA requires Alto Maipo to obtain from the Environmental Evaluation Service (“SEA”) an acceptablea definitive interpretation of the RCA’s provisions concerning the authorized times to operate certain vehicles. In addition, Alto Maipo must obtain the SEA’s approval concerning the control, discharge, and treatmentA number of Infiltration Water. Alto Maipo continueslawsuits have been filed in relation to seek the relevant final approvals from the SEA. Furthermore,


in May 2018, three lawsuits were filed with the Environmental Court of Santiago (“ECS”) challenging the April 2018 Approval. These lawsuits were consolidated into one process in the Second Environmental Tribunal of Santiago ("Tribunal"). In October 2021, the Tribunal issued a ruling in favor of Alto Maipo does not believe that there are grounds to challengeand the April 2018 Approval. The ECS has not decidedSMA, upholding the lawsuits to date. If Alto Maipo complies with the requirementsvalidity of the Compliance Plan and dismissing all consolidated lawsuits. This ruling was appealed. The appeal is now in the Chilean Supreme Court, which is considering whether to accept the appeal. Further, in January 2022, Alto Maipo received the definitive interpretation of the RCA´s provisions concerning the authorized times to operate certain vehicles. Accordingly, Alto Maipo intends to request that the Compliance Plan be declared fulfilled and formally closed. If the Compliance Plan is ultimately declared to be fulfilled and closed, and if the above-referenced lawsuits areappeal is dismissed, the Formulation of Charges will be discharged without penalty. Otherwise, Alto Maipo could be subject to penalties, and the construction of the project could be negatively impacted. Alto Maipo will pursue its interests vigorously in these matters; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
In June 2017, Alto Maipo terminated one of its contractors, Constructora Nuevo Maipo S.A. (“CNM”), given CNM’s stoppage of tunneling works, its failure to produce a completion plan, and its other breaches of contract. Also, Alto Maipo drew $73 million under letters of credit (“LC Funds”) in connection with its termination of CNM. Alto Maipo is pursuinginitiated arbitration against CNM to recover excess completion costs and other damages totaling over $230at least $236 million (net of the LC Funds) relating to CNM’s breaches (“First Arbitration”). CNM deniesdenied liability and seekssought a declaration that its termination was wrongful, damages allegedly resulting from that termination, and other relief. CNM has made submissions allegingalleged that it iswas entitled to damages ranging from $90$70 million to $150$170 million (which includeincluded the LC Funds) plus interest and costs.costs, based on various scenarios. Alto Maipo has contested these submissions. There will be another round of briefing. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled forin the First Arbitration took place May 20-31, 2019.2019, and closing arguments were heard June 9-10, 2020. Also, in August 2018, CNM purported to initiate a separate arbitration against AES GenerAndes and the Company (“Second Arbitration”). In the Second Arbitration, CNM seekssought to pierce Alto Maipo’s corporate veil and appearsappeared to seek an award requiringholding AES GenerAndes and the Company jointly and severally liable to pay any alleged net amounts that are found to be due to CNM in the First Arbitration or otherwise. Alto Maipo requested in the First Arbitration an interim order restraining CNM from proceeding with theThe Second Arbitration until the conclusion of the First Arbitration. That request was denied. Separately, AES Gener and the Company requested that the relevant arbitral institution decide that the Second Arbitration shall not proceed, given that (among other reasons) there is no arbitration agreement between AES Gener and the Company and CNM. That request was not granted. Subsequently, AES Gener and the Company requested that the Second Arbitration be consolidated into the First Arbitration. That requestIn October 2021, the Tribunal issued a final and enforceable Partial Award in favor of Alto Maipo. The Tribunal held, among other things, that Alto Maipo properly terminated the relevant tunneling contract and that Alto Maipo’s draw of the LC Funds was granted.proper. Also, the Tribunal determined that Alto Maipo was entitled to be paid additional damages of nearly $107 million (net after offsets) and that interest would accrue on the total amount of damages awarded until paid by CNM. The scheduleTribunal also dismissed the Second Arbitration as moot. The Tribunal reserved for further proceedings, the issues of the interest to be paid by CNM and, as to all parties, the award of legal fees and costs. To date, CNM has not yet beenpaid the damages awarded to Alto Maipo. Instead, CNM has made an application for an immaterial correction to the Partial Award. CNM has also filed an application to revise the Partial Award seeking to reduce the net damages awarded to AM to approximately $42 million. Alto Maipo will contest the application for revision. In the meantime, the Tribunal has established on CNM’s claims againstthe schedule for the next phase of the proceedings relating to interest, fees, and costs. Each of Alto Maipo, AES GenerAndes, and the Company. Each of the above-referenced AES companiesCompany believes it has meritorious claims and/or defenses and will pursue its interests vigorously; however, there can be no assurances that each of the AES companies will be successful in its efforts.
In February 2018, Tau Power B.V. and Altai Power LLP (collectively, “AES Claimants”) initiated arbitration againstOctober 2017, the Republic of Kazakhstan (“ROK”)Maritime Prosecution Office from Valparaíso issued a ruling alleging responsibility by AES Andes for the ROK’s failurepresence of coal waste on Ventanas beach, and proposed a fine before the Maritime Governor. AES Andes submitted its statement of defense, denying the allegations. An evidentiary stage was concluded and then re-opened by order of the Maritime Governor on February 5, 2019 to pay approximately $75 million (“Return Transfer Payment”) forallow AES Andes an opportunity to present reports and other evidence to challenge the returngrounds of two hydropower plants (“HPPs”) pursuantthe ruling. AES Andes has completed its presentation of evidence and awaits the Maritime Prosecution Office’s decision of the case. In May 2021, AES Andes was notified of an amended Opinion of the Maritime Prosecution Office which extends the alleged liability to a concession agreement. In April 2018,third party and


76 | 2021 Annual Report

reduces the ROKproposed fine to AES Andes to approximately $372,000. AES Andes responded by denying liabilityto the new Opinion on May 31. On August 18, the Maritime Governor issued a resolution affirming the proposed fine, and asserting purported counterclaims concerningon September 8, AES Andes filed an administrative action with the annual payment provisions in the concession agreement, a bonus allegedly due for the 1997 takeoverMaritime Governor requesting reconsideration of the HPPs,fine. On December 28, 2021 the resolution rejecting the reinstatement appeal was notified and dividends paid byon January 17, 2022 AES Andes filed an appeal against that ruling. AES Andes believes that it has meritorious defenses to the HPPs. The ROK seeks to recover the Return Transfer Payment (which is in an escrow account maintained by a third party) and appears to be seeking over $480 million on its counterclaims. The AES Claimants believe that the ROK’s defenses and counterclaims are without merit. An arbitrator has been appointed to decide the case. The final evidentiary hearing is scheduled for July 22 to 26, 2019. The AES Claimants will pursue their case and assert their defenses vigorously;allegations; however, there can beare no assurances that theyit will be successful in their efforts.defending this action.
In December 2018, a lawsuit was filed in Dominican Republic civil court against the Company, AES Puerto Rico, and three other AES affiliates. The lawsuit purports to be brought on behalf of over 100 Dominican claimants, living and deceased, and appears to seek relief relating to CCRs that were delivered to the Dominican Republic in 2004. The lawsuit generally alleges that the CCRs caused personal injuries and deaths and demands $476 million in alleged damages. The lawsuit does not identify, or provide any supporting information concerning, the alleged injuries of the claimants individually. Nor does the lawsuit provide any information supporting the demand for damages or explaining how the quantum was derived. The relevant AES companies believe that they have meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against them and will defend themselves vigorously in this proceeding; however, there can be no assurances that they will be successful in their efforts.
In February 2019, a separate lawsuit was filed in Dominican Republic civil court against the Company, AES Puerto Rico, two other AES affiliates, and an unaffiliated company and its principal. The lawsuit purports to be brought on behalf of over 200 Dominican claimants, living and deceased, and appears to seek relief relating to CCRs that were delivered to the Dominican Republic in 2003 and 2004. The lawsuit generally alleges that the CCRs caused personal injuries and deaths and demands over $900 million in alleged damages. The lawsuit does not identify, or provide any supporting information concerning, the alleged injuries of the claimants individually. Nor does the lawsuit provide any information supporting the demand for damages or explaining how the quantum was derived. In August 2020, at the request of the relevant AES companies, the case was transferred to a different civil court. Preliminary hearings are ongoing in that court. The relevant AES companies believe that they have meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against them and will defend themselves vigorously in this proceeding; however, there can be no assurances that they will be successful in their efforts.
In October 2019, the Superintendency of the Environment (the "SMA") notified AES Andes of certain alleged breaches associated with the environmental permit of the Ventanas Complex, initiating a sanctioning process through Exempt Resolution N° 1 / ROL D-129-2019. The alleged charges include exceeding generation limits, failing to reduce emissions during episodes of poor air quality, exceeding limits on discharges to the sea, and exceeding noise limits. AES Andes has submitted a proposed “Compliance Program” to the SMA for the Ventanas Complex. The latest version of this Compliance Program was submitted on May 26, 2021. On December 30, 2021, the Compliance Program was approved by the SMA. However an ex officio action was brought by the SMA due to alleged exceedances of generation limits, which would require the Company to reduce SO2, NOx and PM emissions in order to achieve the emissions offset established in the Compliance Program. On January 6, 2022, AES Andes filed a reposition with the SMA seeking modification of the means for compliance with the ex officio action. The reposition filing is currently under review by the SMA. The effects of the ex officio action are suspended until the reposition is resolved, but the SMA ruling is otherwise unaffected. Fines are possible if the SMA determines there is an unsatisfactory execution of the Compliance Program. The cost of proposed Compliance Program is approximately $10.8 million.
In March 2020, Mexico’s Comisión Federal de Electricidad (“CFE”) served an arbitration demand upon AES Mérida III. CFE makes allegations that AES Mérida III is in breach of its obligations under a power and capacity purchase agreement ("Contract") between the two parties, which allegations relate to CFE’s own failure to provide fuel within the specifications of the Contract. CFE seeks to recover approximately $190 million in payments made to AES Merida under the Contract as well as approximately $431 million in alleged damages for having to acquire power from alternative sources in the Yucatan Peninsula. AES Mérida has filed an answer denying liability to CFE and asserting a counterclaim for damages due to CFE’s breach of its obligations. The parties submitted their respective initial briefs and supporting evidence in December 2020. After additional briefing, the evidentiary hearing took place in November 2021. Closing arguments are scheduled for May 2022. Subsequently, the arbitration Tribunal will issue its decision in the case. AES Mérida believes that it has meritorious defenses and claims and will assert them vigorously in the arbitration; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
In February 2022, a lawsuit was filed in Dominican Republic civil court against the Company. The lawsuit purports to be brought on behalf of over 425 Dominican claimants, living and deceased, and appears to seek relief relating to CCRs that were delivered to the Dominican Republic in 2003 and 2004. The lawsuit generally alleges


77 | 2021 Annual Report

that the CCRs caused personal injuries and deaths and demands over $600 million in alleged damages. The lawsuit does not identify or provide any supporting information concerning the alleged injuries of the claimants individually. Nor does the lawsuit provide any information supporting the demand for damages or explaining how the quantum was derived. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it and will defend itself vigorously in this proceeding; however, there can be no assurances that it will be successful in its efforts.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.



78 | 2021 Annual Report

PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Stock Repurchase Program — The Board authorization permits the Parent Company to repurchase stock through a variety of methods, including open market repurchases and/or privately negotiated transactions. There can be no assurances as to the amount, timing or prices of repurchases, which may vary based on market conditions and other factors. The Stock Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date and can be modified or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time. The cumulative repurchaserepurchases from the commencement of the Stock Repurchase Program in July 2010 through December 31, 2018 is2021 totaled 154.3 million shares atfor a total cost of $1.9 billion, at an average price per share of $12.12 (including a nominal amount of commissions). As of December 31, 2018,2021, $264 million remained available for repurchase under the Stock Repurchase Program. No repurchases were made by The AES Corporation of its common stock in 20182021, 2020, and 2017, respectively. The Parent Company repurchased 8,686,983 shares of its common stock in 2016.2019.
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "AES."
Dividends
The Parent Company commenced a quarterly cash dividend in the fourth quarter of 2012. The Parent Company has increased this dividend annually and the quarterly per-share cash dividenddividends for the last three years are displayed below.
Commencing the fourth quarter of 2018 2017 2016Commencing the fourth quarter of202120202019
Cash dividend $0.1365 $0.13 $0.12Cash dividend$0.1580$0.1505$0.1433
The fourth quarter 20182021 cash dividend is to be paid in the first quarter of 20192022. There can be no assurance the AES Board will declare a dividend in the future or, if declared, the amount of any dividend. Our ability to pay dividends will also depend on receipt of dividends from our various subsidiaries across our portfolio.
Under the terms of our senior securedrevolving credit facility, which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate, we have limitations on our ability to pay cash dividends and/or repurchase stock. Our subsidiaries' ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is also subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans, governmental provisions and other agreements to which our subsidiaries are subject. See the information contained under Item 12.—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans of this Form 10-K.
Holders
As of February 21, 2019,24, 2022, there were approximately 3,8753,612 record holders of our common stock.





79 | 2021 Annual Report

Performance Graph
THE AES CORPORATION
PEER GROUP INDEX/STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE

chart-144c2c145bca509193b.jpgaes-20211231_g15.jpg
Source: Bloomberg
We have selected the Standard and Poor's ("S&P") 500 Utilities Index as our peer group index. The S&P 500 Utilities Index is a published sector index comprising the 2728 electric and gas utilities included in the S&P 500.
The five year total return chart assumes $100 invested on December 31, 20132016 in AES Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Utilities Index. The information included under the heading Performance Graph shall not be considered "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents our selected financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. This data should be read together with Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K. The selected financial data for each of the years in the five year period ended December 31, 20182021 have been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Prior period amounts have been restated to reflect discontinued operations in all periods presented. Prior to July 1, 2014, a discontinued operation was a component of the Company that either had been disposed of or was classified as held-for-sale and where the Company did not expect to have significant cash flows or significant continuing involvement with the component as of one year after its disposal or sale. Effective July 1, 2014, the Company adopted new accounting guidance under which the Company reports a business as discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results when the business is sold or classified as held-for-sale. Please refer to Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further explanation. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.
Acquisitions, disposals, reclassifications, and changes in accounting principles affect the comparability of information included in the tables below. Please refer to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further explanation of the effect of such activities. Please also refer to Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K and Note 26—27—Risks and Uncertainties to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and


Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for certain risks and uncertainties that may cause the data reflected herein not to be indicative of our future financial condition or results of operations.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Statement of Operations Data for the Years Ended December 31:(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue$10,736
 $10,530
 $10,281
 $11,260
 $12,604
Income (loss) from continuing operations (1)
1,349
 (148) 191
 682
 941
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax985
 (507) (20) 318
 678
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax (2)
218
 (654) (1,110) (12) 91
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$1,203
 $(1,161) $(1,130) $306
 $769
Per Common Share Data         
Basic earnings (loss) per share:         
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$1.49
 $(0.77) $(0.04) $0.46
 $0.94
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.33
 (0.99) (1.68) (0.01) 0.13
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$1.82
 $(1.76) $(1.72) $0.45
 $1.07
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:         
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$1.48
 $(0.77) $(0.04) $0.46
 $0.94
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.33
 (0.99) (1.68) (0.02) 0.12
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$1.81
 $(1.76) $(1.72) $0.44
 $1.06
Dividends Declared Per Common Share$0.53
 $0.49
 $0.45
 $0.41
 $0.25
Cash Flow Data for the Years Ended December 31:         
Net cash provided by operating activities$2,343
 $2,504
 $2,897
 $2,136
 $1,800
Net cash used in investing activities(505) (2,599) (2,136) (2,128) (1,075)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(1,643) 43
 (747) 28
 (1,262)
Total increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash215
 (172) 9
 (10) (529)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, ending2,003
 1,788
 1,960
 1,951
 1,961
Balance Sheet Data at December 31: 
Total assets$32,521
 $33,112
 $36,124
 $36,545
 $38,676
Non-recourse debt (noncurrent)13,986
 13,176
 13,731
 12,184
 12,077
Non-recourse debt (noncurrent)—Discontinued operations
 
 758
 772
 1,226
Recourse debt (noncurrent)3,650
 4,625
 4,671
 4,966
 5,047
Redeemable stock of subsidiaries879
 837
 782
 538
 78
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)(1,005) (2,276) (1,146) 143
 512
The AES Corporation stockholders' equity3,208
 2,465
 2,794
 3,149
 4,272
_____________________________
(1)
Includes pre-tax gains on sales of business interests of $984 million, $29 million, $29 million and $358 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and pre-tax losses of $52 million for the year ended December 31, 2017; pre-tax impairment expense of $208 million, $537 million, $1.1 billion, $602 million and $383 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively; other-than-temporary impairments of equity method investments of $147 million and $128 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2014, respectively; income tax expense of $194 million and $675 million related to the one-time transition tax on foreign earnings, and income tax benefit of $77 million and expense of $39 million related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See Note 23—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions, Note 8—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense, Note 7—Investments in and Advances to AffiliatesandNote 21—Income Taxesincluded in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
80 | 2021 Annual Report

Selected Financial Data
20212020201920182017
Statement of Operations Data for the Years Ended December 31:(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue$11,141 $9,660 $10,189 $10,736 $10,530 
Income (loss) from continuing operations (1)
(955)149 477 1,349 (148)
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax(413)43 302 985 (507)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation, net of tax (2)
218 (654)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(409)$46 $303 $1,203 $(1,161)
Per Common Share Data     
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.62)$0.06 $0.46 $1.49 $(0.77)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 0.01 — 0.33 (0.99)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$(0.61)$0.07 $0.46 $1.82 $(1.76)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.62)$0.06 $0.45 $1.48 $(0.77)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 0.01 — 0.33 (0.99)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$(0.61)$0.07 $0.45 $1.81 $(1.76)
Dividends Declared Per Common Share$0.61 $0.58 $0.55 $0.53 $0.49 
Cash Flow Data for the Years Ended December 31:
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,902 $2,755 $2,466 $2,343 $2,504 
Net cash used in investing activities(3,051)(2,295)(2,721)(505)(2,599)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities797 (78)(86)(1,643)43 
Total increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(343)255 (431)215 (172)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, ending1,484 1,827 1,572 2,003 1,788 
Balance Sheet Data at December 31:
Total assets$32,963 $34,603 $33,648 $32,521 $33,112 
Non-recourse debt (noncurrent)13,603 15,005 14,914 13,986 13,176 
Recourse debt (noncurrent)3,729 3,446 3,391 3,650 4,625 
Redeemable stock of subsidiaries1,257 872 888 879 837 
Accumulated deficit(1,089)(680)(692)(1,005)(2,276)
The AES Corporation stockholders' equity2,798 2,634 2,996 3,208 2,465 
_____________________________
(1)Includes pre-tax losses on sales of business interests of $1.7 billion, $95 million, and $52 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2017, respectively, and pre-tax gains of $28 million and $984 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively; pre-tax impairment expense of $1.6 billion, $864 million, $185 million, $208 million, and $537 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively; other-than-temporary impairment of equity method investments of $202 million, $92 million, and $147 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively; income tax expense of $194 million and $675 million related to the one-time transition tax on foreign earnings, income tax benefit of $176 million related to the reversal of uncertain tax positions effectively settled upon the closure of the Company's 2017 U.S. tax return exam for the year ended December 31, 2021, and income tax benefit of $77 million and expense of $39 million related to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively; and net equity in losses of affiliates, primarily at Guacolda, of $123 million, and $172 million, for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Note 24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions, Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense, Note 8—Investments in and Advances to AffiliatesandNote 23—Income Taxesincluded in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
(2)Includes gain on sale of $199 million and loss on deconsolidation of $611 million related to Eletropaulo for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.


(2)
Includes gain on sale of $199 million and loss on deconsolidation of $611 million related to Eletropaulo for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and impairment expense of $382 million and loss on sale of $737 million related to Sul for the year ended December 31, 2016. See Note 22—Discontinued Operationsincluded in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
81 | 2021 Annual Report



ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Summary
In 2018,2021, AES delivered strong financial results and achieved significant milestones on its strategic goals, including continuing to enhance the resilience of the portfolio and growing the backlog of renewable projects. The Company achieved a key investment grade metric,financial objectives. We completed construction or the acquisition of 1.32.1 GW of new projectsrenewables generation and signed long-term PPAs for 2an additional 5 GW of renewable capacity.new renewables. Fluence completed its IPO and began trading in November 2021. See Overview of our Strategy included in Item 1.—Business of this Form 10-K for further information.
During 2018, the Company saw increased margins at its South America, MCAC and US and Utilities SBUs. These increases were primarily due to higher tariffs and rates in Argentina and the U.S., higher contract prices in Colombia, new PPAs in Chile, and increased sales due to the commencement of operations at the Colon combined cycle facility in Panama and Eagle Valley CCGT in the U.S. The Company also experienced decreased margins in the Eurasia SBU due to completed sales of Masinloc in 2018 and the Kazakhstan facilities in 2017. In addition, the Company reduced its recourse debt by approximately $1 billion in 2018, resulting in a decrease in Parent Company interest.
Overview of 2018 Results
Earnings Per Share Results in 2018 (in millions, except per share amounts)
Years Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations$1.48
 $(0.77) $(0.04)
Adjusted EPS (a non-GAAP measure) (1)
1.24
 1.08
 0.94
_____________________________
(1)
See reconciliation and definition under SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures.
DilutedCompared with last year, diluted earnings per share from continuing operations increased $2.25 to $1.48 for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compareddecreased $0.68, from $0.06 to a loss of $0.77 for$0.62. This decrease reflects the loss on deconsolidation of Alto Maipo in the current period, higher current year ended December 31, 2017. This increase was primarilyimpairments, and lower contributions from Brazil due to the current year gains on sales of Masinloc, CTNG and Electrica Santiago, prior year loss on salerevision of the Kazakhstan CHPsGSF liability and HPPs, prior year impairments at DPL, Laurel Mountain and in Kazakhstan, lower interest expense at the Parent Company and Gener, a one-time transition tax on foreign earnings following the enactment of the TCJA in the prior year, and higher margins. These increases weredrier hydrology; partially offset by higher current year taxmargins at our US and Utilities SBU including new renewables, Southland Energy, and Southland, lower Parent Company interest expense due to the new GILTI rules in the U.S. in large part due to the salerealized gains on de-designated interest rate swaps and lower interest rates, gains on Fluence capital raisings, a gain on remeasurement of our interest in Masinloc, the current year impairment at Shady Point, other-than-temporary impairment of the Guacolda equity method investment in Chile, foreign exchange losses mainly due to the devaluation of the Argentine pesosPower's development platform, and foreign currency gains in the prior year, higher current year losses on extinguishment of debt, and a favorable legal settlement at Uruguaiana in the prior year.lower income tax expense.
Adjusted EPS, a non-GAAP measure, increased $0.16, or 15%,$0.08, from $1.44 to $1.24,$1.52, mainly reflecting higher margins at the South America,contributions from our US and Utilities SBU, including new renewables and MCAC SBUsSouthland Energy, higher generation at Chivor due to the life extension project completed in the prior year and better hydrology, and lower Parent Company interest expense due to realized gains on de-designated interest rate swaps and lower interest on Parent Company debt. These increases wererates; partially offset by a higher adjusted tax rate, lower margin atcontributions from Brazil due to the Eurasia SBU mainly driven byprior year revision of the salesGSF liability and drier hydrology, the prior year impacts of Masinloca gain on sale of land in the U.S., incremental capitalized interest in Chile, and Kazakhstan.
recovery of previously expensed payments from customers in Chile; and the impact of the inclusion of shares underlying the purchase contract component of our March 2021 equity units issuance.




82 | 2021 Annual Report

Review of Consolidated Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31,202120202019% Change 2021 vs. 2020% Change 2020 vs. 2019
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
US and Utilities SBU$4,335 $3,918 $4,058 11 %-3 %
South America SBU3,541 3,159 3,208 12 %-2 %
MCAC SBU2,157 1,766 1,882 22 %-6 %
Eurasia SBU1,123 828 1,047 36 %-21 %
Corporate and Other116 231 46 -50 %NM
Eliminations(131)(242)(52)-46 %NM
Total Revenue11,141 9,660 10,189 15 %-5 %
Operating Margin:
US and Utilities SBU792 638 754 24 %-15 %
South America SBU1,069 1,243 873 -14 %42 %
MCAC SBU521 559 487 -7 %15 %
Eurasia SBU216 186 188 16 %-1 %
Corporate and Other158 120 39 32 %NM
Eliminations(45)(53)-15 %NM
Total Operating Margin2,711 2,693 2,349 %15 %
General and administrative expenses(166)(165)(196)%-16 %
Interest expense(911)(1,038)(1,050)-12 %-1 %
Interest income298 268 318 11 %-16 %
Loss on extinguishment of debt(78)(186)(169)-58 %10 %
Other expense(60)(53)(80)13 %-34 %
Other income410 75 145 NM-48 %
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests(1,683)(95)28 NMNM
Asset impairment expense(1,575)(864)(185)82 %NM
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)(10)55 (67)NMNM
Other non-operating expense— (202)(92)-100 %NM
Income tax benefit (expense)133 (216)(352)NM-39 %
Net equity in losses of affiliates(24)(123)(172)-80 %-28 %
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS(955)149 477 NM-69 %
Gain from disposal of discontinued businesses, net of income tax expense of $1, $0, and $0, respectively33 %NM
NET INCOME (LOSS)(951)152 478 NM-68 %
Less: Loss (income) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries542 (106)(175)NM-39 %
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(409)$46 $303 NM-85 %
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax$(413)$43 $302 NM-86 %
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax33 %NM
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(409)$46 $303 NM-85 %
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,902 $2,755 $2,466 -31 %12 %
Years Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016 % Change 2018 vs. 2017 % Change 2017 vs. 2016
(in millions, except per share amounts)     
Revenue:   
US and Utilities SBU$4,230
 $4,162
 $4,330
 2 % -4 %
South America SBU3,533
 3,252
 2,956
 9 % 10 %
MCAC SBU1,728
 1,519
 1,274
 14 % 19 %
Eurasia SBU1,255
 1,590
 1,670
 -21 % -5 %
Corporate and Other41
 35
 77
 17 % -55 %
Eliminations(51) (28) (26) -82 % -8 %
Total Revenue10,736
 10,530
 10,281
 2 % 2 %
Operating Margin:         
US and Utilities SBU733
 693
 719
 6 % -4 %
South America SBU1,017
 862
 823
 18 % 5 %
MCAC SBU534
 465
 390
 15 % 19 %
Eurasia SBU227
 422
 427
 -46 % -1 %
Corporate and Other58
 23
 14
 NM
 64 %
Eliminations4
 
 10
 NM
 -100 %
Total Operating Margin2,573
 2,465
 2,383
 4 % 3 %
General and administrative expenses(192) (215) (194) -11 % 11 %
Interest expense(1,056) (1,170) (1,134) -10 % 3 %
Interest income310
 244
 245
 27 %  %
Loss on extinguishment of debt(188) (68) (13) NM
 NM
Other expense(58) (58) (80)  % -28 %
Other income72
 120
 64
 -40 % 88 %
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests984
 (52) 29
 NM
 NM
Asset impairment expense(208) (537) (1,096) -61 % -51 %
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)(72) 42
 (15) NM
 NM
Other non-operating expense(147) 
 (2) NM
 -100 %
Income tax expense(708) (990) (32) -28 % NM
Net equity in earnings of affiliates39
 71
 36
 -45 % 97 %
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS1,349
 (148) 191
 NM
 NM
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued businesses, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(2), $(21), and $229, respectively(9) (18) 151
 -50 % NM
Gain (loss) from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(44), $0, and $266, respectively225
 (611) (1,119) NM
 -45 %
NET INCOME (LOSS)1,565
 (777) (777) NM
  %
Noncontrolling interests:         
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries(364) (359) (211) 1 % 70 %
Less: Loss (income) from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests2
 (25) (142) NM
 -82 %
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$1,203
 $(1,161) $(1,130) NM
 3 %
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:      
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax$985
 $(507) $(20) NM
 NM
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax218
 (654) (1,110) NM
 -41 %
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$1,203
 $(1,161) $(1,130) NM
 3 %
Net cash provided by operating activities$2,343
 $2,504
 $2,897
 -6 % -14 %
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE$0.53
 $0.49
 $0.45
 8 % 9 %

Components of Revenue, Cost of Sales and Operating Margin — Revenue includes revenue earned from the sale of energy from our utilities and the capacityproduction and productionsale of energy from our generation plants, which are classified as regulated and non-regulated, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Revenue also includes the gains or losses on derivatives associated with the sale of electricity.
Cost of sales includes costs incurred directly by the businesses in the ordinary course of business. Examples include electricity and fuel purchases, operations and maintenance costs, depreciation and amortization expense,expenses, bad debt expense and recoveries, and general administrative and support costs (including employee-related costs directly associated with the operations of the business). Cost of sales also includes the gains or losses on derivatives (including embedded derivatives other than foreign currency embedded derivatives) associated with the purchase of electricity or fuel.


Operating margin is defined as revenue less cost of sales.


83 | 2021 Annual Report

Consolidated Revenue and Operating Margin

Year Ended December 31, 20182021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020
Revenue
(in millions)

chart-0040dd9be7a8e7a83a0.jpgaes-20211231_g16.jpg
Consolidated Revenue Revenue increased $206 million,$1.5 billion, or 2%15%, in 20182021 compared to 2017. Excluding the unfavorable FX impact of $52 million, primarily in South America partially offset by Eurasia, this increase was2020, driven by:
$357 million in South America primarily due to higher contract sales and prices in Colombia and the commencement of new PPAs at Angamos and Cochrane in Chile, as well as higher capacity prices in Argentina resulting from market reforms enacted in 2017;
$215 million in MCAC primarily due to to the commencement of operations at the Colon combined cycle facility as well as improved hydrology at Panama, higher pass-through fuel prices in Mexico, higher contracted energy sales due to commencement of operations at the Los Mina combined cycle facility in June 2017, and higher spot prices in the Dominican Republic; and
$68417 million in US and Utilities driven primarily by higher market energy sales at Southland higher regulated rates commencing in November 2017 at DPL, higher wholesale volumeEnergy primarily due to the new CCGT coming online as well asunits operating under active PPAs during the full 2021 period; higher retail demand at IPL,in El Salvador due to the economic recovery from the COVID-19 impact; higher fuel revenues and higher pricesdemand from favorable weather at AES Indiana; increases in capacity sales and in realized gains resulting from the commercial hedging strategy at Southland; and higher sales at AES Clean Energy due to tariff resetthe supply agreement with Google; partially offset by decreased capacity at DPL due to its exit from the generation business;
$391 million in MCAC driven by higher contract sales, fuel prices, and LNG sales, driven by the Eastern Pipeline COD in 2020, in the Dominican Republic; higher pass-through fuel prices in Mexico; and higher energy prices and contract sales due to increased demand in El Salvador,Panama; partially offset by the impact from the sale of Itabo in April 2021;
$382 million in South America primarily driven by the revenue recognized at Angamos for the early termination of contracts with Minera Escondida and closureMinera Spence; higher generation and prices (Resolution 440/2021) in Argentina; higher availability, from higher reservoir levels, in Colombia; and higher volume and generation at AES Brasil, partially due to the acquisition of several generation facilities at DPL.
These favorable impacts werethe Ventus and Cubico wind complexes; partially offset by decreasesunfavorable FX impact and by the prior period recovery of $366previously expensed payments from customers in Chile; and
$295 million in Eurasia due to the sale of the Masinloc power plantmainly driven by higher energy prices and generation in March 2018, as well as the sale of the Kazakhstan CHPsBulgaria and expiration of the Kazakhstan HPP concession agreementhigher generation in 2017.Vietnam.
Operating Margin
(in millions)
chart-24b049b88597b964e3b.jpgaes-20211231_g17.jpg


84 | 2021 Annual Report

Consolidated Operating Margin Operating margin increased $108$18 million, or 4%1%, in 20182021 compared to 2017. Excluding the favorable impact of FX of $8 million, primarily driven by Eurasia, this increase was2020, driven by:
$154 million in US and Utilities primarily from higher sales at Southland Energy due to the CCGT units operating under active PPAs during the full 2021 period; increases in capacity sales and in realized gains resulting from the commercial hedging strategy at Southland; and higher demand in El Salvador due to the economic recovery from the COVID-19 impact; partially offset by increased costs associated with growing and accelerating the development pipeline at AES Clean Energy and by higher maintenance expenses at AES Indiana;
$46 million at Corporate and Other, mainly eliminated at consolidated level, driven by increases in IT costs reallocated to the operating segments and premiums earned by the AES self-insurance company; and
$30 million in Eurasia mainly driven by higher energy prices and generation in Bulgaria and improved operational performance in Vietnam.
These favorable impacts were partially offset by a decrease of:
$174 million in South America primarily due to unfavorable FX impact; higher energy purchases due to drier hydrology and a prior period GSF settlement at Tietê; and higher spot prices on energy prices and prior period recovery of previously expensed payments from customers in Chile; partially offset by revenue recognized at Angamos for the early termination of contracts with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence; higher generation and prices (Resolution 440/2021) in Argentina; lower fixed costs in Chile; and higher availability, from higher reservoir levels, in Colombia; and
$38 million in MCAC mainly driven by the impact from the sale of Itabo in April 2021; decreased capacity and higher fixed costs in the Dominican Republic; decreased availability and higher fixed costs in Mexico; and higher fuel costs, drier hydrology, and the disconnection of the Estrella del Mar I power barge in the prior year in Panama; partially offset by higher LNG sales in the Dominican Republic driven by the Eastern Pipeline COD in 2020 and higher demand and positive impact from new renewables businesses in Panama.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019
Revenue
(in millions)

aes-20211231_g18.jpg
Consolidated RevenueRevenue decreased $529 million, or 5%, in 2020 compared to 2019, driven by:
$219 million in Eurasia driven by the sale of the Northern Ireland businesses in June 2019 and lower generation in Vietnam;
$140 million in US and Utilities mainly driven by a decrease in energy pass-through rates and lower demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic in El Salvador, lower regulated rates as a result of the changes in AES Ohio's ESP, lower retail sales demand at AES Indiana and DPL primarily due to milder weather and COVID-19 pandemic impacts, and decreased capacity sales, at Southland due to unit retirements, and at DPL due to the sale and closure of generation facilities. These decreases were partially offset by increased capacity sales at Southland Energy due to the commencement of the PPAs;
$116 million in MCAC mainly driven by lower generation and volume pass-through fuel revenue in Mexico, the disconnection of the Estrella del Mar I power barge from the grid in Panama, and lower market prices,


85 | 2021 Annual Report

spot sales and demand in both the Dominican Republic and at the Colon combined cycle facility in Panama. These decreases were partially offset by higher LNG sales in the Dominican Republic, driven by the Eastern Pipeline COD in 2020; and
$49 million in South America driven by unfavorable FX impact, drier hydrology and lower generation in Colombia due to a life extension project being performed at the Chivor hydro plant, lower pass-through coal prices, spot prices, and lower generation in Chile, and lower energy and capacity prices (Resolution 31/2020) in Argentina, partially offset by revenue recognized at Angamos for the early termination of contracts with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence and recovery of previously expensed payments from customers in Chile.
Operating Margin
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g19.jpg
Consolidated Operating MarginOperating margin increased $344 million, or 15%, in 2020 compared to 2019, driven by:
$370 million in South America primarily due to the drivers discussed above, andas well as a $184 million favorable revision to the absenceGSF liability at Tietê related to the passage of maintenance costsa regulation providing concession extensions to hydro plants as compensation for planned outages in 2018 versus maintenance performed in Q3 2017 at Gener Chile;prior period non-hydrological risk charges incorrectly assessed by the regulator; and


$7072 million in MCAC primarily due to drivers discussed above; and
$40 million in US and Utilities mostly due to higher availability at Changuinola due to the drivers discussed abovetunnel lining upgrade in 2019, improved hydrology in Panama, and higher LNG sales in the Dominican Republic, partially offset by prior year insurance recoveries associated with the lightning incident at the Andres facility in 2018, current year outage due to Andres steam turbine failure, and the favorable impactdisconnection of a one time reductionthe Estrella del Mar I power barge from the grid in the ARO liability at DPL's closed plants, Stuart and KIllen.Panama.
These favorable impacts were partially offset by a decrease of $204$116 million in EurasiaUS and Utilities mostly due to lower regulated rates as a result of the changes in AES Ohio's ESP, lower retail sales demand at DPL and AES Indiana primarily due to milder weather and COVID-19 pandemic impacts, lower capacity sales due to the drivers discussed above.
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Revenue
(in millions)

chart-e69e7eaa7d7b86883d7.jpg
Consolidated RevenueRevenue increased $249 million, or 2%, in 2017 compared to 2016. Excluding the netretirement of units at Southland, a favorable FX impact of $38 million, primarily in South America, the increase was driven by:
$249 million in South America primarily duerevision to the startARO at DPL, and cost recoveries from DPL's joint owners of commercial operations at Cochrane as well as higher availability at Argentina,Stuart and Killen in 2019, partially offset by lower spotincreased capacity sales at Chivor; and
$248 million in MCAC primarilySouthland Energy due to the commencement of the combined cycle operationsPPAs, and lower depreciation expense at Los Mina in June 2017 as well as higher rates in the Dominican Republic.
These favorable impacts were partially offset by decreases of $168 million in US & Utilities mainly due to lower retail tariffs, lower wholesale volume and price at DPL as well as hurricane impacts at Puerto Rico, partially offset by higher pass through costs in El Salvador.
Operating Margin
(in millions)
chart-8af33ca5eec73989ef4.jpg
Consolidated Operating MarginOperating margin increased $82 million, or 3%, in 2017 compared to 2016. Excluding the favorable impact of FX of $39 million, primarily in Brazil, Argentina, and Colombia, the increase was primarily driven by:
$73 million in MCACSouthland due to the commencementextension of the Los Mina combined cycle operations in June 2017 in the Dominican Republic as well as higher availability due to forced outages in 2016 at Mexico.
These positive impacts were partially offset by a decreases of $26 million in US and Utilities driven by lower retain margin, lower volumes, and lower commercial availability at DPL as well as a negative impact at IPL mainly due to one-off accruals due to the implementation of new base rates in Q2 2016.


water board permits.
See Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—SBU Performance Analysis of this Form 10-K for additional discussion and analysis of operating results for each SBU.
Consolidated Results of Operations — Other
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses include expenses related to corporate staff functions and initiatives, executive management, finance, legal, human resources, and information systems, as well as global development costs.
General and administrative expenses decreased $23increased $1 million, or 11%1%, to $192$166 million for 2018,2021 compared to $215$165 million for 2017 primarily due to reduced people costs, professional fees and business development activity.2020, with no material drivers.


86 | 2021 Annual Report

General and administrative expenses increased $21decreased $31 million, or 11%16%, to $215$165 million for 2017,2020 compared to $194$196 million for 20162019, primarily due to severancea higher reallocation of information technology costs related to workforce reductions associated with a major restructuring program, increasedthe SBUs and lower professional fees, and increased businesspartially offset by higher development activity.costs.
Interest expense
Interest expense decreased $114$127 million, or 10%12%, to $1,056$911 million for 2018,2021, compared to $1,170$1,038 million for 20172020 primarily due to realized gains on de-designated interest rate swaps, lower interest rates related to refinancing at the Parent Company and lower monetary correction due to the GSF settlement in March 2021.
Interest expense decreased $12 million, or 1%, to $1,038 million for 2020, compared to $1,050 million for 2019 primarily due to incremental capitalized interest in Chile and lower interest rates due to refinancing at the Parent Company, partially offset by lower capitalized interest due to the commencement of operations at the Alamitos and Huntington Beach facilities in February 2020.
Interest income
Interest income increased $30 million, or 11%, to $298 million for 2021, compared to $268 million for 2020 primarily due to the reductionarbitration proceeding in Chile, the commencement of debta sales-type lease at the Parent Company, favorable impacts from interest rate swapsAES Energy Storage Alamitos project in ChileJanuary 2021, and increased capitalized interest at Alto Maipo.
Interest expense increased $36 million, or 3%, to $1,170 million for 2017, compared to $1,134 million for 2016 primarily due to an increase at the South America SBU, driven by lower capitalized interest in 2017 due to the Cochrane plant starting commercial operations in the second half of 2016.
Interest income
Interest income increased $66 million, or 27%, to $310 million for 2018, compared to $244 million for 2017 primarily due to higher CAMMESA interest rates and increased long termon receivables asin Argentina, partially offset by a result of the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard. See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies includedlower loan receivable balance in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.Vietnam.
Interest income decreased $1$50 million, or 16%, to $268 million for 2020, compared to $318 million for 2019 primarily due to the decrease of the LIBOR rate on receivables in 2017 from 2016 with no material drivers.Argentina, a lower loan receivable balance at Mong Duong, and a lower average interest rate at AES Brasil.
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Loss on extinguishment of debt increased $120decreased $108 million, or 58%, to $188$78 million for 2018,2021, compared to $68$186 million for 2017.2020. This increasedecrease was primarily due to higherprior year losses of $145 million and $34 million at the Parent Company of $79 millionand DPL, respectively, resulting from the redemption of senior notes and a prior year gain on early retirement$16 million loss resulting from the Panama refinancing. These decreases were partially offset in 2021 by a loss of debt$27 million due to the prepayment at AES Argentina of $65 million; partially offset by lowerBrasil, losses at other subsidiariesArgentina and AES Andes of $24$17 million and $14 million, respectively, due to repayments, and a refinancing resulting in 2018.a loss at Andres of $14 million.
Loss on extinguishment of debt increased $55$17 million, or 10% to $68$186 million for 2017,2020, compared to $13$169 million for 2016 primarily related to losses of $92 million, $20 million, and $9 million on debt extinguishments at the Parent Company, AES Gener, and IPALCO, respectively. The loss2019. This increase was partially offset by a gain on early retirement of debt at AES Argentina of $65 million.
Other income
Other income decreased $48 million, or 40%, to $72 million for 2018, compared to $120 million for 2017 primarily due to the 2017 favorable settlement of legal proceedings at Uruguaiana related to YPF's breach of the parties’ gas supply agreement and a decrease in allowance for funds used during construction in the US and Utilities SBU. These decreases wereincreases mentioned above partially offset by a gain on remeasurementlosses of contingent liabilities for projects$45 million at DPL, $31 million at Mong Duong, $29 million at AES Andes, $28 million at Colon, and $24 million at Cochrane in Hawaii in 2018.
Other income increased $56 million, or 88%, to $120 million for 2017, compared to $64 million for 2016 primarily due to the 2017 favorable legal settlement mentioned above.
Other expense
Other expense remained flat at $58 million for 2018, compared to 2017 primarily due to a loss2019 resulting from damage associated with a lightning incident at the Andres facility in the Dominican Republic in 2018 and higher non-service pension and other postretirement costs in 2018. This was offset by the 2017 write-offredemption or refinancing of water rights for projects that were no longer being pursued in the South America SBU and a loss on disposal of assets at DPL as a result of the decision to close the coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units at Stuart and Killen.


Other expense decreased $22 million, or 28%, to $58 million for 2017, compared to $80 million for 2016 primarily due to the 2016 recognition of a full allowance on a non-trade receivable in the MCAC SBU as a result of payment delays. This decrease was partially offset by the 2017 loss on disposal of assets at DPL as a result of the decision to close the coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units at Stuart and Killen and the write-off of water rights in the South America SBU for projects that are no longer being pursued.senior notes.
See Note 19—11—Other Income and ExpenseDebt included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Other income
Other income increased $335 million to $410 million for 2021, compared to $75 million for 2020 primarily due to the current year gain on remeasurement of our equity interest in the sPower development platform to its acquisition-date fair value, recognized as part of the merger to form AES Clean Energy Development, legal arbitration at Alto Maipo, and the gain on remeasurement of contingent consideration of the Great Cove Solar acquisition at Clean Energy, partially offset by the prior year gain on sale of Redondo Beach land at Southland.
Other income decreased $70 million, or 48% to $75 million for 2020, compared to $145 million for 2019 primarily due to 2019 gains on insurance recoveries associated with property damage at the Andres facility and upgrading the tunnel lining at Changuinola, partially offset by the 2020 gain on sale of Redondo Beach land at Southland.
Other expense
Other expense increased $7 million, or 13%, to $60 million for 2021, compared to $53 million for 2020 primarily due to a current year loss recognized at commencement of a sales-type lease at AES Renewable Holdings and an increase in loss on sale and disposal of assets, partially offset by lower losses on sales of Stabilization Fund receivables in Chile and compliance with an arbitration decision in 2020.


87 | 2021 Annual Report

Other expense decreased $27 million, or 34% to $53 million for 2020, compared to $80 million for 2019 primarily due to 2019 losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases at AES Renewable Holdings, the 2019 loss on disposal of assets at Changuinola associated with upgrading the tunnel lining, and lower defined benefit plan costs at AES Indiana in 2020, partially offset by a loss on sale of Stabilization Fund receivables in Chile and compliance with an arbitration decision in 2020.
See Note 21—Other Income and Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests
GainLoss on disposal and sale of business interests was $984increased $1,588 million to $1,683 million for 20182021, compared to $95 million for 2020, primarily due to the $772$2,074 million loss on the deconsolidation of Alto Maipo, partially offset by the issuance of new shares by Fluence, our equity method investment, to new investors, which AES has accounted for as a gain on the partial disposition of its investment in Fluence, and the gain on the sale of Masinloc and the $129 million and $69 million gains on sales of CTNG and Electrica Santiago, respectively, in Chile.Guacolda.
Loss on disposal and sale of business interests was $52$95 million for 20172020, primarily due to the $49 million and $33 million lossesloss on sale of Uruguaiana and the loss on the settlement of the arbitration related to the sale of Kazakhstan CHPs and HPPs, respectively, partially offset by the recognition of a $23 million gain related to the expiration of a contingency at Masinloc.
Gain on disposal and sale of business interests was $29OPGC; as compared to a gain of $28 million for 20162019, primarily due to the $49 million gain on sale of DPLER,a portion of our interest in sPower's operating assets, the gain on the merger of Simple Energy to form Uplight, and the gain on transfer of Stuart and Killen, partially offset by the $20 million loss on the deconsolidationsale of U.K. Wind.Kilroot and Ballylumford.
See Note 23—24—Held-For-SaleHeld-for-Sale and Dispositions and Note 8Investments in and Advances to Affiliates included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
GoodwillAsset impairment expense
There were no goodwillAsset impairment expense increased $711 million to $1,575 million for 2021, compared to $864 million for 2020. This increase was primarily due to impairments of $649 million and $155 million related to AES Andes’ commitment to accelerate the retirement of the Ventanas 3 & 4 and Angamos coal-fired plants, respectively, a $475 million impairment at Puerto Rico associated with the economic costs and reputational risks of disposal of coal combustion residuals off island, impairments of $29 million, $73 million, and $91 million at Buffalo Gap I, II, and III wind generation facilities, respectively, due to an expired PPA and volatile spot prices in the ERCOT market, and a $67 million impairment at the Mountain View I & II wind facilities related to a repowering project that will result in decommissioning the majority of the existing wind turbines in advance of their depreciable lives. The increase was partially offset by the $564 million and $213 million impairments related to the Angamos and Ventanas 1 & 2 coal-fired plants in Chile in the prior year and the $38 million impairment of the generation facility in Hawaii during 2020.
Asset impairment expense increased $679 million to $864 million for 2020, compared to $185 million for 2019. This increase was primarily driven by a $781 million impairment related to certain coal-fired plants at AES Andes and a $30 million impairment of the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, or 2016.Estrella del Mar I power barge in Panama, compared to a $115 million impairment at Kilroot and Ballylumford upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria in 2019.
See Note 8—22—Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsAsset Impairment Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Asset impairment expense
Asset impairment expense decreased $329 million, or 61%, to $208 million for 2018, compared to $537 million for 2017 mainly driven by prior year impairments of $186 million recognized in Kazakhstan due to the classification of the CHPs and HPPs as held-for-sale and $296 million in the U.S. as a result of the decision to sell the DPL peaker assets and a decline in forward pricing at Laurel Mountain, partially offset by a current year impairment of $157 million due to decreased future cash flows and the decision to sell Shady Point.
Asset impairment expense decreased $559 million, or 51%, to $537 million for 2017, compared to $1,096 million for 2016 mainly driven by the impairment of $859 million at DPL in 2016, partially offset by a $121 million impairment at Laurel Mountain in 2017 as a result of a decline in forward pricing.
See Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) in millions were as follows:
Years Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016Years Ended December 31,202120202019
Argentina (1)
$(71) $1
 $37
Argentina (1)
$(21)$29 $(73)
CorporateCorporate(11)21 (1)
Dominican RepublicDominican Republic(1)
Chile(13) 8
 (9)Chile20 (5)
Bulgaria(6) 14
 (8)
United Kingdom(2) (3) 13
Philippines(1) 15
 12
Mexico
 17
 (8)
Colombia6
 (23) (8)
Corporate11
 3
 (50)
Other4
 10
 6
Other
Total (2)
$(72) $42
 $(15)
Total (2)
$(10)$55 $(67)
_____________________________
(1)    Primarily associated with the peso-denominated energy receivable indexed to the USD through the FONINVEMEM agreement which is considered a foreign currency derivative. See Note 7—Financing Receivables included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
(2)    Includes gains of $12 million and $57 million, and losses of$31 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.


(1)
Primarily associated with the peso-denominated energy receivable indexed to the USD through the FONINVEMEM agreement which is considered a foreign currency derivative. See Note 6—Financing Receivables included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
88 | 2021 Annual Report
(2)

Includes gains of $23 million, losses of $21 million, andgainsof$17 million on foreign currency derivative contracts for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


The Company recognized net foreign currency transaction losses of $72$10 million for the year ended December 31, 20182021, primarily driven by the depreciation of the Argentine peso, unrealized losses on foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables in Argentina, and unrealized losses at the Parent Company resulting from the depreciation of intercompany receivables denominated in Euro, partially offset by unrealized derivative gains on foreign currency derivatives due to the unrealized losses from the devaluation of receivables denominated in Argentine pesos and realized losses from Chilean pesos. These losses were partially offset by foreign currency derivative gains at the Parent Company.depreciating Colombian peso.
The Company recognized net foreign currency transaction gains of $42$55 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020, primarily driven by transactions associated with VAT activityrealized and unrealized gains on foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables in Mexico,Argentina and unrealized gains at the amortization of frozen embedded derivatives inParent Company resulting from the Philippines, and appreciation of the Eurointercompany receivables denominated in Bulgaria. These gains were partially offset by foreign currency derivative losses in Colombia due to a change in functional currency.Euro.
The Company recognized net foreign currency transaction losses of $15$67 million for the year ended December 31, 20162019, primarily due to remeasurementdriven by unrealized losses on intercompany notes, and losses on swaps and options at the Parent Company. These losses were partially offset by foreign currency derivative gainsderivatives related to government receivables in Argentina.Argentina and unrealized losses associated with the devaluation of long-term receivables denominated in the Argentine peso.
Other non-operating expense
Other non-operating expense was $147$202 million and $92 million in 20182020 and 2019, respectively, due to the other-than-temporary impairment of the OPGC equity method investment. In December 2019, an other-than-temporary impairment of $92 million was identified at OPGC primarily due to the $144estimated market value of the Company's investment and other negative developments impacting future expected cash flows at the investee. In March 2020, the Company recognized an additional $43 million other-than-temporary impairment due to the economic slowdown. In June 2020, the Company agreed to sell its entire stake in the OPGC investment, resulting in an other-than-temporary impairment of the Guacolda equity method investment as a result of increased renewable generation in Chile lowering energy prices and impacting the ability of Guacolda to re-contract its existing PPAs after they expire.
$158 million. There were no significant other non-operating expenses in 2017 and 2016.during the year ended December 31, 2021.
See Note 7—8—Investments in and Advances to Affiliates included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Income tax expensebenefit (expense)
Income tax expense decreased $282benefit was $133 million to $708 million in 2018 asfor the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, compared to $990income tax expense of $216 million for 2017.the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. The Company's effective tax rates were 35%13% and 128%44% for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
The net decreasechange in the 20182021 effective tax rate was primarily due to greater 2017 impacts related to U.S. tax reform one-time transition tax and remeasurement of deferred tax assets, relative to the 2018 U.S. tax reform impact to adjust the provisional estimate recorded under SAB 118, which provides SEC guidance on the application of the accounting standards for the initial enactment2021 impacts of the TCJA. Thisdeconsolidation of Alto Maipo and the asset impairment at Puerto Rico. These impacts were partially offset by the income tax benefit related to effective settlement resulting from the exam closure of the Company’s U.S. 2017 tax return. Additionally offsetting the aforementioned impacts was the benefit associated with the release of valuation allowance due to a change in expected realizability of net decreaseoperating loss carryforwards at one of our Brazilian subsidiaries. The 2020 effective tax rate was also attributable toimpacted by the impactother-than-temporary impairment of the OPGC equity method investment and the loss on sale of the Company’s entire interest in AES Uruguaiana, partially offset by the recognition of a federal ITC for the Na Pua Makani wind facility in Hawaii. See Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for details of the asset impairment. See Note 24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for details of the sale of the Company's entire 51% equity interest in Masinloc, offset by taxation of our foreign subsidiaries under U.S. GILTI rules.AES Uruguaiana and the deconsolidation of Alto Maipo.
Income tax expense increased $958decreased $136 million to $990$216 million in 20172020 as compared to $32$352 million for 2016.2019. The Company's effective tax rates were 128%44% and 17%35% for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.
2019. The net increase in the 20172020 effective tax rate was primarily due primarily to the enactment of the TCJA in the U.S., partially offset by the2020 impacts of the 2016 Chilean tax law reformdrivers cited above. Further, the 2019 rate was impacted by the nondeductible losses on the sale of the Company's entire 100% interest in the Kilroot coal and oil-fired plant and energy storage facility and the 2016 devaluationBallylumford gas-fired plant in the United Kingdom and associated asset impairments. Further impacting the 2019 effective tax rate were the effects of the Mexican peso.Argentine peso devaluation to tax expense, as well as to pretax income for nondeductible unrealized losses on foreign currency derivatives related to government receivables in Argentina. See Note 21—24—Income TaxesHeld-for-Sale and Dispositions included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional information regardingdetails of the 2016 Chilean income tax law reform.sales.
Our effective tax rate reflects the tax effect of significant operations outside the U.S., which are generally taxed at rates different than the U.S. statutory rate. Foreign earnings may be taxed at rates higher than the U.S. corporate rate of 21% and are also subject to current U.S. taxation under the GILTI rules introduced by the TCJA. A future


89 | 2021 Annual Report

proportionate change in the composition of income before income taxes from foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions could impact our periodic effective tax rate. The Company also benefits from reduced tax rates in certain countries as a result of satisfying specific commitments regarding employment and capital investment. See Note 21—23—Income Taxes included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding these reduced rates.
Net equity in earningslosses of affiliates
Net equity in earningslosses of affiliates decreased $32$99 million, or 45%80%, to $39$24 million for 2018,in 2021, compared to $71$123 million for 2017in 2020. This was primarily driven by earnings at sPower in 2021 of $79 million, compared to losses in the prior year, driven by renewable projects that came online and prior year impairments of certain development projects, and $81 million of losses at AES Andes in 2020 mainly due to a long-lived asset impairment and the suspension of equity method accounting at Guacolda. This decrease in losses was partially offset by an increase in losses at Fluence which was formedof $45 million due to shipping issues, cost overruns and delays at projects under construction, and an increase in costs associated with the first quartergrowing business, as well as an increase in losses at Uplight of 2018, decreased income at Guacolda, and larger gains on projects that achieved commercial operations in 2017 than in 2018 at sPower, which was purchased in$10 million due to higher costs associated with the third quarter of 2017.growing business.
Net equity in earningslosses of affiliates increased $35decreased $49 million, or 97%28%, to $71$123 million in 2017,2020, compared to $36$172 million for 2016in 2019. This was primarily driven by a $31 million increase in earnings due to earnings at the sPower equity method investment purchased in 2017, partially offset by fixedlower long-lived asset impairments in 2017 at the Distributed Energy entities, accounted forGuacolda, AES Andes' 50%-owned equity affiliate, during 2020 as equity affiliates.


compared to 2019.
See Note 7—8—Investments In and Advances to Affiliates included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
Net income from discontinued operations was $216 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily due to the after-tax gain on sale of Eletropaulo of $199 million recognized in the second quarter of 2018 and the recognition of a $26 million deferred gain upon liquidation of Borsod in October 2018.
Net loss from discontinued operations was $629 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to the after-tax loss on deconsolidation of Eletropaulo of $611 million recognized in the fourth quarter of 2017. The remaining loss was due to a loss contingency recognized by our equity affiliate, partially offset by the income from operations of Eletropaulo prior to the date of deconsolidation.
Net loss from discontinued operations was $968 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the sale of Sul, partially offset by the income from operations of Eletropaulo. The loss includes an after-tax loss on the impairment of Sul of $382 million recognized in the second quarter of 2016 and an additional after-tax loss on the sale of Sul of $737 million recognized upon disposal in October 2016. There was no significant loss from operations related to the Sul discontinued business.
See Note 22—Discontinued Operationsincluded in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries decreased $22$648 million or 6%, to $362a loss of $542 million in 2018,2021, compared to $384income of $106 million in 2017.2020. This decrease was primarily due to:
Current year other-than-temporary impairmentLoss on deconsolidation of Guacolda;Alto Maipo due to loss of control after Chapter 11 filing;
PriorAsset impairments at Buffalo Gap;
Increased costs associated with growing and accelerating the U.S. renewables development pipeline;
Lower earnings in Brazil due to the prior year favorable impactrevision of a legal settlement at Uruguaiana;the GSF liability; and
Lower earnings in the Dominican Republic due to deconsolidation of Eletropaulo in November 2017 and the sale of MasinlocItabo in March 2018.the second quarter.
These decreases were partially offset by:
CurrentAllocation of earnings at Southland Energy to noncontrolling interests;
Higher earnings in Panama primarily due to the prior year gainsasset impairment and loss on salesextinguishment of Electrica Santiagodebt; and CTNG in Chile;
Higher earnings in Colombia primarily due to higher contract sales and prices; and
Higher earnings in Vietnam due to the adoption oflife extension project at the new revenue recognition standard (See Note 1—GeneralChivor hydroelectric plant completed in the prior year and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information).better hydrology.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries increased $31decreased $69 million, or 9%39%, to $384$106 million in 2017,2020, compared to $353$175 million in 2016.2019. This increasedecrease was primarily due to:
AssetLower earnings in Chile due to long-lived asset impairments at Buffalo Gap IAES Andes, partially offset by net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos and IIlower interest expense due to incremental capitalized interest;
Lower earnings in 2016.Colombia due to drier hydrology and a life extension project at the Chivor hydroelectric plant;
Prior year insurance recoveries net of outages at Andres; and
HLBV allocation of losses to noncontrolling interests at AES Renewable Holdings.
These increasesdecreases were partially offset by:
Income tax benefitsHigher earnings in Brazil due to the favorable revision of the GSF liability; and
Prior year losses on extinguishment of debt at Eletropaulo in 2016 (reflected within discontinued operations).Mong Duong and Colon.


90 | 2021 Annual Report

Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation
Net income attributable to The AES Corporation increased $2,364decreased $455 million to $1,203 million in 2018, compared to a loss of $1,161$409 million in 2017.2021, compared to income of $46 million in 2020. This increasedecrease was primarily due to:
Gains on the sales of Masinloc, Eletropaulo (reflected within discontinued operations), CTNG, and Electrica Santiago, and prior year losses on the sales of Kazakhstan CHPs and HPPs;
Prior year lossLoss on deconsolidation of Eletropaulo (reflected within discontinued operations);Alto Maipo due to loss of control after Chapter 11 filing;
Prior year impact of U.S. tax reform enacted in December 2017;
Prior yearHigher asset impairments at DPL, Laurel Mountainin the current year; and in Kazakhstan;
Lower interest expense at the Parent Company and Gener; and
Higher margins at our South America MCAC and US and Utilities SBUs.SBU primarily due to the prior year revision of the GSF liability at Brazil.
These increasesdecreases were partially offset by:
Higher current year tax expenseGain due to the new GILTI rulesinitial public offering of Fluence;
Gain on remeasurement of our equity interest in the U.S.;sPower development platform to acquisition-date fair value;
Current year impairment at Shady Point;


CurrentPrior year other-than-temporary impairment of Guacolda;OPGC;
Lower Parent interest expense due to realized gains on de-designated interest rate swaps and lower interest rates;
Prior year losses on extinguishment of debt at the Parent and DPL;
Higher margins at our US and Utilities SBU primarily due to favorable price variances under the commercial hedging strategy at Southland and at Southland Energy mainly due to the CCGT units operating under active PPAs during the full 2021 period; and
Lower income tax expense.
Net income attributable to The AES Corporation decreased $257 million, or 85% to $46 million in 2020, compared to $303 million in 2019. This decrease was primarily due to:
Long-lived asset impairments at AES Andes and Panama;
Net impact of current and prior year other-than-temporary impairments of OPGC;
Higher losses on extinguishment of debt in the current year;
Current year, foreign exchange losses primarily due to major refinancings at the devaluation of the Argentine peso and foreign currency gains in the prior year;Parent Company;
Prior year favorable impact of a legal settlement at Uruguaiana; and
Lower margins in the current year at our Eurasia SBUUS and Utilities SBU;
Losses on sale of Uruguaiana and the Kazakhstan HPPs as a result of the sales of Masinlocfinal arbitration decision; and Kazakhstan.
Net loss attributable to The AES Corporation increased $31 million, or 3%, to $1,161 million in 2017, compared to $1,130 million in 2016. This increase was primarily due to:
Impact of U.S. tax reform enacted in December 2017;
Losses on the sales of Kazakhstan CHPs and HPPs;
Loss on deconsolidation of Eletropaulo (reflected within discontinued operations);
ImpairmentsPrior year net insurance recoveries at Laurel Mountain, Kilroot and in Kazakhstan; and
Higher loss on extinguishment of debt.Andres.
These increasesdecreases were partially offset by:
ImpairmentsPrior year long-lived asset impairments at DPL in 2016;Kilroot and Ballylumford;
Loss on sale of Sul in 2016 (reflected within discontinued operations);
FavorableNet impact of a legal settlementcurrent and prior year long-lived asset impairments at Uruguaiana;Guacolda;
Higher gainsPrior year unrealized losses on foreign currency transactions; andderivatives related to government receivables in Argentina;
Higher margins at our South America and MCAC SBU.SBUs;
Lower income tax expense;
Lower interest expense due to incremental capitalized interest in Chile; and
Gain on sale of land held by AES Redondo Beach at Southland.
SBU Performance Analysis
Segments
We are organized into four4 market-oriented SBUs: US and Utilities (United States, Puerto Rico and El Salvador); South America (Chile, Colombia, Argentina and Brazil); MCAC (Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean); and Eurasia (Europe and Asia). During the first quarter of 2018, the Andes and Brazil SBUs were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported together as part of the South America SBU. Further, the Puerto Rico and El Salvador businesses, formerly part of the MCAC SBU, were combined with the US SBU, which is now reported as the US and Utilities SBU.


91 | 2021 Annual Report

Non-GAAP Measures
Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC and Adjusted EPS are non-GAAP supplemental measures that are used by management and external users of our Consolidated Financial Statements such as investors, industry analysts and lenders.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company updated the definition of Adjusted EPS item (g) tax benefit or expense related to the enactment effects of 2017 U.S. tax law reform and related regulations and any subsequent period adjustments related to enactment effects to include the 2021 tax benefit on reversal of uncertain tax positions effectively settled upon the closure of the Company's 2017 U.S. tax return exam.
Effective January 1, 2021, the Company changed the definitions of Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC, and Adjusted EPS to remove the adjustment for costs directly associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocations, and office consolidation. As this adjustment was specific to the major restructuring program announced by the Company in 2018, we believe removing this adjustment from our non-GAAP definitions provides simplification and clarity for our investors.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company changed the definitions of Adjusted Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC and Adjusted EPS to exclude net gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence. We believe the inclusion of the effects of this non-recurring transaction would result in a lack of comparability in our results of operations and would distort the metrics that our investors use to measure us.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company changed the definitions of Adjusted PTC and Adjusted EPS to exclude unrealized gains orand losses from equity securities resulting from a newly effective accounting standard.recognized at commencement of sales-type leases. We believe these transactions are economically similar to sales of business interests and excluding these gains or losses provides a more accurate picturebetter reflects the underlying business performance of continuing operations. Factors in this determination include the variability due to unrealized gains or losses related to equity securities remeasurement. Company.
Adjusted Operating Margin
We define Adjusted Operating Margin as Operating Margin, adjusted for the impact of NCI, excluding (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions; (b) benefits and costs associated with dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures; and (c) costs directlynet gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocationsthe early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and office consolidation.Minera Spence. The allocation of HLBV earnings to noncontrolling interests is not adjusted out of Adjusted Operating Margin. See Review of Consolidated Results of Operations for definitions of Operating Margin and cost of sales.
The GAAP measure most comparable to Adjusted Operating Margin is Operating Margin.Margin. We believe that Adjusted Operating Margin better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company. Factors in this determination include the impact of NCI, where AES consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly owned by the Company, as well as the variability due to unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions and strategic decisions to dispose of or acquire business interests. Adjusted Operating Margin should not be construed as an alternative to Operating Margin, which is determined in accordance with GAAP.


Reconciliation of Adjusted Operating Margin (in millions)Years Ended December 31,Reconciliation of Adjusted Operating Margin (in millions)Years Ended December 31,
2018 2017 2016202120202019
Operating Margin$2,573
 $2,465
 $2,383
Operating Margin$2,711 $2,693 $2,349 
Noncontrolling interests adjustment (1)
(686) (689) (645)
Noncontrolling interests adjustment (1)
(722)(831)(670)
Unrealized derivative losses (gains)19
 (5) 9
Unrealized derivative (gains) lossesUnrealized derivative (gains) losses(28)24 11 
Disposition/acquisition losses21
 22
 
Disposition/acquisition losses11 24 15 
Restructuring costs (2)
1
 22
 
Net gains from early contract terminations at AngamosNet gains from early contract terminations at Angamos(251)(182)— 
Total Adjusted Operating Margin$1,928
 $1,815
 $1,747
Total Adjusted Operating Margin$1,721 $1,728 $1,705 
_____________________________
(1)The allocation of HLBV earnings to noncontrolling interests is not adjusted out of Adjusted Operating Margin.



(1)
The allocation of HLBV earnings to noncontrolling interests is not adjusted out of Adjusted Operating Margin.92 | 2021 Annual Report
(2)
In February 2018, the Company announced a reorganization as a part of its ongoing strategy to simplify its portfolio, optimize its cost structure and reduce its carbon intensity.
chart-1fed0bfe137f56ea81d.jpg
aes-20211231_g20.jpg
Adjusted PTC
We define Adjusted PTC as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions and equity securities; (b) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses; (c) gains, losses, benefits and costs associated with dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures;closures, and gains and losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases; (d) losses due to impairments; (e) gains, losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt; and (f) costs directlynet gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocationsthe early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and office consolidation.Minera Spence. Adjusted PTC also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities.
Adjusted PTC reflects the impact of NCI and excludes the items specified in the definition above. In addition to the revenue and cost of sales reflected in Operating Margin, Adjusted PTC includes the other components of our Consolidated Statement of Operations, such as general and administrative expenses in the Corporate segment, as well as business development costs, interest expense and interest income, other expense and other income, realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses, and net equity in earnings of affiliates.
The GAAP measure most comparable to Adjusted PTC is income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation. We believe that Adjusted PTC better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company and is the most relevant measure considered in the Company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments. Factors in this determination include the variability due to unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions or equity securities remeasurement, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, losses due to impairments, and strategic decisions to dispose of or acquire business interests or retire debt, or implement restructuring initiatives,and the non-recurring nature of the impact of the early contract terminations at Angamos, which affect results in a given period or periods. In addition, earnings before taxAdjusted PTC represents the business performance of the Company before the application of statutory income tax rates and tax adjustments, including the effects of tax planning, corresponding to the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Given its large number of businesses and complexity, the Company concluded that Adjusted PTC is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the Company's results.
Adjusted PTC should not be construed as an alternative to income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation, which is determined in accordance with GAAP.




Reconciliation of Adjusted PTC (in millions)Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to The AES Corporation$985
 $(507) $(20)
Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to The AES Corporation563
 828
 (111)
Pre-tax contribution1,548
 321
 (131)
Unrealized derivative and equity securities losses (gains)33
 (3) (9)
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)51
 (59) 22
Disposition/acquisition losses (gains)(934) 123
 6
Impairment expense307
 542
 933
Loss on extinguishment of debt180
 62
 29
Restructuring costs (1)

 31
 
Total Adjusted PTC$1,185
 $1,017
 $850
_____________________________
(1)
In February 2018, the Company announced a reorganization as a part of its ongoing strategy to simplify its portfolio, optimize its cost structure and reduce its carbon intensity.93 | 2021 Annual Report
chart-d3dca43ddd8d514c9c6.jpg
Reconciliation of Adjusted PTC (in millions)Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to The AES Corporation$(413)$43 $302 
Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to The AES Corporation(31)130 250 
Pre-tax contribution(444)173 552 
Unrealized derivative and equity securities losses (gains)(1)113 
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)14 (10)36 
Disposition/acquisition losses861 112 12 
Impairment losses1,153 928 406 
Loss on extinguishment of debt91 223 121 
Net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos(256)(182)— 
Total Adjusted PTC$1,418 $1,247 $1,240 
aes-20211231_g21.jpg
Adjusted EPS
We define Adjusted EPS as diluted earnings per share from continuing operations excluding gains or losses of both consolidated entities and entities accounted for under the equity method due to (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions and equity securities; (b) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses; (c) gains, losses, benefits and costs associated with dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures, and the tax impact from the repatriation of sales proceeds;proceeds, and gains and losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases; (d) losses due to impairments; (e) gains, losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt; (f) costs directlynet gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocationsthe early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and office consolidation;Minera Spence; and (g) tax benefit or expense related to the enactment effects of 2017 U.S. tax law reform and related regulations and any subsequent period adjustments related to enactment effects. effects, including the 2021 tax benefit on reversal of uncertain tax positions effectively settled upon the closure of the Company's U.S. tax return exam.
The GAAP measure most comparable to Adjusted EPS is diluted earnings per share from continuing operations. We believe that Adjusted EPS better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company and is considered in the Company's internal evaluation of financial performance. Factors in this determination include the variability due to unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions or equity securities remeasurement, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, losses due to impairments, and strategic decisions to dispose of or acquire business interests or retire debt, or implement restructuring initiatives,the one-time impact of the 2017 U.S. tax law reform and subsequent period adjustments related to enactment effects, and the non-recurring nature of the impact of the early contract terminations at Angamos, which affect results in a given period or periods. Adjusted EPS should not be construed as an alternative to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations, which is determined in accordance with GAAP.


94 | 2021 Annual Report

The Company reported a loss from continuing operations of $0.77 and $0.04 per share$0.62 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2021. For purposes of measuring diluted loss per share under GAAP, common stock equivalents were excluded from weighted average shares as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. However, for purposes of computing Adjusted EPS, the Company has included the impact of anti-dilutivedilutive common stock equivalents. The table below reconciles the weighted average shares used in GAAP diluted loss per share to


the weighted average shares used in calculating the non-GAAP measure of Adjusted EPS. No reconciliation is necessary
Reconciliation of Denominator Used for Adjusted EPSYear Ended December 31, 2021
(in millions, except per share data)LossShares$ per Share
GAAP DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
Loss from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$(413)666 $(0.62)
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
Stock options— — 
Restricted stock units— — 
Equity units33 0.03 
NON-GAAP DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE$(411)703 $(0.59)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EPSYears Ended December 31,
202120202019
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations$(0.59)$0.06 $0.45 
Unrealized derivative and equity securities losses— 0.01 0.17 (1)
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)0.02 (0.01)0.05 (2)
Disposition/acquisition losses1.22 (3)0.17 (4)0.02 (5)
Impairment losses1.65 (6)1.39 (7)0.61 (8)
Loss on extinguishment of debt0.13 (9)0.33 (10)0.18 (11)
Net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos(0.37)(12)(0.27)(12)— 
U.S. Tax Law Reform Impact(0.25)(13)0.02 (14)(0.01)
Less: Net income tax expense (benefit)(0.29)(15)(0.26)(16)(0.11)(17)
Adjusted EPS$1.52 $1.44 $1.36 
_____________________________
(1)Amount primarily relates to unrealized derivative losses in Argentina of $89 million, or $0.13 per share, mainly associated with foreign currency derivatives on government receivables.
(2)Amount primarily relates to unrealized FX losses in Argentina of $25 million, or $0.04 per share, mainly associated with the devaluation of long-term receivables denominated in Argentine pesos, and unrealized FX losses at the Parent Company of $12 million, or $0.02 per share, mainly associated with intercompany receivables denominated in Euro.
(3)Amount primarily relates to loss on deconsolidation of Alto Maipo of $1.5 billion, or $2.09 per share, loss on Uplight transaction with shareholders of $25 million, or $0.04 per share, and a day-one loss recognized at commencement of a sales-type lease at AES Renewable Holdings of $13 million, or $0.02 per share, partially offset by gain on initial public offering of Fluence of $325 million, or $0.46 per share, gain on remeasurement of our equity interest in sPower to acquisition-date fair value of $249 million, or $0.35 per share, gain on Fluence issuance of shares of $60 million, or $0.09 per share, and gain on sale of Guacolda of $22 million, or $0.03 per share.
(4)Amount primarily relates to loss on sale of Uruguaiana of $85 million, or $0.13 per share, loss on sale of the Kazakhstan HPPs of $30 million, or $0.05 per share, as a result of the final arbitration decision, and advisor fees associated with the successful acquisition of additional ownership interest in AES Brasil of $9 million, or $0.01 per share; partially offset by gain on sale of OPGC of $23 million, or $0.03 per share.
(5)Amount primarily relates to losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases at AES Renewable Holdings of $36 million, or $0.05 per share, and loss on sale of Kilroot and Ballylumford of $31 million, or $0.05 per share; partially offset by gain on sale of a portion of our interest in sPower’s operating assets of $28 million, or $0.04 per share, gain on disposal of Stuart and Killen at DPL of $20 million, or $0.03 per share, and gain on sale of ownership interest in Simple Energy as part of the Uplight merger of $12 million, or $0.02 per share.
(6)Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at AES Andes of $540 million, or $0.77 per share, at Puerto Rico of $475 million, or $0.68 per share, at Mountain View of $67 million, or $0.10 per share, at our sPower equity affiliate, impacting equity earnings by $24 million, or $0.03 per share, at Buffalo Gap of $22 million, or $0.03 per share, at Clean Energy of $14 million, or $0.02 per share, and at Laurel Mountain of $7 million, or $0.01 per share.
(7)Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at AES Andes of $527 million, or $0.79 per share, other-than-temporary impairment of OPGC of $201 million, or $0.30 per share, impairments at our Guacolda and sPower equity affiliates, impacting equity earnings by $85 million, or $0.13 per share, and $57 million, or $0.09 per share, respectively; impairment at AES Hawaii of $38 million, or $0.06 per share, and impairment at Panama of $15 million, or $0.02 per share.
(8)Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at Kilroot and Ballylumford of $115 million, or $0.17 per share, and at AES Hawaii of $60 million, or $0.09 per share; impairments at our Guacolda and sPower equity affiliates, impacting equity earnings by $105 million, or $0.16 per share, and $21 million, or $0.03 per share, respectively; and other-than-temporary impairment of OPGC of $92 million, or $0.14 per share.
(9)Amount primarily relates to losses on early retirement of debt at AES Brasil of $27 million, or $0.04 per share, at Argentina of $17 million, or $0.02 per share, at AES Andes of $15 million, or $0.02 per share, and at Andres and Los Mina of $15 million, or $0.02 per share.
(10)Amount primarily relates to losses on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $146 million, or $0.22 per share, DPL of $32 million, or $0.05 per share, Angamos of $17 million, or $0.02 per share, and Panama of $11 million, or $0.02 per share.
(11)Amount primarily relates to losses on early retirement of debt at DPL of $45 million, or $0.07 per share, AES Andes of $35 million, or $0.05 per share, Mong Duong of $17 million, or $0.03 per share, and Colon of $14 million, or $0.02 per share.
(12)Amounts relate to net gains at Angamos associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence of $256 million, or $0.37 per share, and $182 million, or $0.27 per share, for the yearperiods ended December 31, 2018 as2021 and 2020, respectively.
(13)Amount relates to the Company reported income from continuing operations.tax benefit on reversal of uncertain tax positions effectively settled upon the closure of the Company's 2017 U.S. tax return exam of $176 million, or $0.25 per share.
(14)Amount represents adjustment to tax law reform remeasurement due to incremental deferred taxes related to DPL of $16 million, or $0.02 per share.
Reconciliation of Denominator Used For Adjusted Earnings Per Share Year Ended December 31, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016
(in millions, except per share data) Loss Shares $ per share Loss Shares $ per share
GAAP DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE            
Loss from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders $(507) 660
 $(0.77) $(25) 660
 $(0.04)
EFFECT OF ANTI-DILUTIVE SECURITIES            
Restricted stock units 
 2
 0.01
 
 2
 
NON-GAAP DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE $(507) 662
 $(0.76) $(25) 662
 $(0.04)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EPSYears Ended December 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations$1.48
 $(0.76) $(0.04) 
Unrealized derivative and equity securities losses (gains)0.05
 
 (0.01) 
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)0.09
(1) 
(0.10) 0.03
 
Disposition/acquisition losses (gains)(1.41)
(2) 
0.19
(3) 
0.01
 
Impairment expense0.46
(4) 
0.82
(5) 
1.41
(6) 
Loss on extinguishment of debt0.27
(7) 
0.09
(8) 
0.05
(9) 
Restructuring costs
 0.05
 
 
U.S. Tax Law Reform Impact0.18
(10) 
1.08
(11) 

 
Less: Net income tax expense (benefit)0.12
(12) 
(0.29)
(13) 
(0.51)
(14) 
Adjusted EPS$1.24
 $1.08
 $0.94
 


_____________________________
(1)
Amount primarily relates to unrealized FX losses of $22 million, or $0.03 per share, associated with the devaluation of long-term receivables denominated in Argentine pesos, and unrealized FX losses of $14 million, or $0.02 per share, on intercompany receivables denominated in Euros and British pounds at the Parent Company.
95 | 2021 Annual Report

(15)Amount primarily relates to income tax benefits associated with the loss on deconsolidation of Alto Maipo of $209 million, or $0.30 per share, income tax benefits associated with the impairments at AES Andes of $146 million, or $0.21 per share, at Puerto Rico of $20 million, or $0.03 per share, and at Mountain View of $15 million, or $0.02 per share, partially offset by income tax expense associated with the gain on initial public offering of Fluence of $73 million, or $0.10 per share, income tax expense related to net gains at Angamos associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence of $69 million, or $0.10 per share, and income tax expense associated with the gain on remeasurement of our equity interest in sPower of $55 million, or $0.08 per share.
(16)Amount primarily relates to income tax benefits associated with the impairments at AES Andes and Guacolda of $164 million, or $0.25 per share, and income tax benefits associated with losses on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $31 million, or $0.05 per share; partially offset by income tax expense related to net gains at Angamos associated with the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence of $49 million, or $0.07 per share.
(17)Amount primarily relates to the income tax benefits associated with the impairments at OPGC of $23 million, or $0.03 per share, Guacolda of $13 million, or $0.02 per share, AES Hawaii of $13 million, or $0.02 per share, and Kilroot and Ballylumford of $11 million, or $0.02 per share, and income tax benefits associated with losses on early retirement of debt of $24 million, or $0.04 per share; partially offset by an adjustment to income tax expense related to 2018 gains on sales of business interests, primarily Masinloc, of $25 million, or $0.04 per share.
(2)
Amount primarily relates to gain on sale of Masinloc of $772 million, or $1.16 per share, gain on sale of CTNG of $86 million, or $0.13 per share, gain on sale of Electrica Santiago of $36 million, or $0.05 per share, gain on remeasurement of contingent consideration at AES Oahu of $32 million, or $0.05 per share, gain on sale related to the Company's contribution of AES Advancion energy storage to the Fluence joint venture of $23 million, or $0.03 per share and realized derivative gains associated with the sale of Eletropaulo of $21 million, or $0.03 per share; partially offset by loss on disposal of the Beckjord facility and additional shutdown costs related to Stuart and Killen at DPL of $21 million, or $0.03 per share.
(3)
Amount primarily relates to loss on sale of Kazakhstan CHPs of $49 million, or $0.07 per share, realized derivative losses associated with the sale of Sul of $38 million, or $0.06 per share, loss on sale of Kazakhstan HPPs of $33 million, or $0.05 per share, and costs associated with early plant closures at DPL of $24 million, or $0.04 per share; partially offset by gain on Masinloc contingent consideration of $23 million, or $0.03 per share and gain on sale of Miami Fort and Zimmer of $13 million, or $0.02 per share.
(4)
Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at Shady Point of $157 million, or $0.24 per share, and Nejapa of $37 million, or $0.06 per share, and other-than-temporary impairment of Guacolda of $96 million, or $0.14 per share.
(5)
Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at Kazakhstan CHPs of $94 million, or $0.14 per share, at Kazakhstan HPPs of $92 million, or $0.14 per share, at Laurel Mountain of $121 million, or $0.18 per share, at DPL of $175 million, or $0.27 per share and at Kilroot of $37 million, or $0.05 per share.
(6)
Amount primarily relates to asset impairments at DPL of $859 million, or $1.30 per share, at Buffalo Gap II of $159 million ($49 million, or $0.07 per share, net of NCI) and at Buffalo Gap I of $77 million ($23 million, or $0.03 per share, net of NCI).
(7)
Amount primarily relates to loss on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $171 million, or $0.26 per share.
(8)
Amount primarily relates to losses on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $92 million, or $0.14 per share, at AES Gener of $20 million, or $0.02 per share, and at IPALCO of $9 million or $0.01 per share; partially offset by a gain on early retirement of debt at AES Argentina of $65 million, or $0.10 per share.
(9)
Amount primarily relates to the loss on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $19 million, or $0.03 per share.
(10)
Amount relates to a SAB 118 charge to finalize the provisional estimate of one-time transition tax on foreign earnings of $194 million, or $0.29 per share, partially offset by a SAB 118 income tax benefit to finalize the provisional estimate of remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate of $77 million, or $0.11 per share.
(11)
Amount relates to a one-time transition tax on foreign earnings of $675 million, or $1.02 per share and the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate of $39 million, or $0.06 per share.
(12)
Amount primarily relates to the income tax expense under the GILTI provision associated with the gains on sales of business interests, primarily Masinloc, of $97 million, or $0.15 per share, and income tax expense associated with gains on sale of CTNG of $36 million, or $0.05 per share and Electrica Santiago of $13 million, or $0.02 per share; partially offset by income tax benefits associated with the loss on early retirement of debt at the Parent Company of $36 million, or $0.05 per share, and income tax benefits associated with the impairment at Shady Point of $33 million, or $0.05 per share.
(13)
Amount primarily relates to the income tax benefit associated with asset impairments of $148 million, or $0.22 per share.
(14)
Amount primarily relates to the income tax benefit associated with asset impairments of $332 million, or $0.50 per share.
US AND UTILITIESand Utilities SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted PTC (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 $ Change 2018 vs. 2017 % Change 2018 vs. 2017 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016For the Years Ended December 31,202120202019$ Change 2021 vs. 2020% Change 2021 vs. 2020$ Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2020 vs. 2019
Operating Margin $733
 $693
 $719
 $40
 6% $(26) -4 %Operating Margin$792 $638 $754 $154 24 %$(116)-15 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
 678
 623
 637
 55
 9% (14) -2 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
617 577 659 40 %(82)-12 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
 511
 424
 392
 87
 21% 32
 8 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
660 505 569 155 31 %(64)-11 %
_____________________________
(1)
(1)    A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business
A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.
Fiscal year 20182021 versus 20172020
Operating Margin increased $40$154 million, or 6%24%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Increase at DPL primarily due to higher regulated rates following the approval of the 2017 ESP and the 2018 distribution rate order and favorable weather$35
Increase at DPL driven by a one-time credit to depreciation expense, primarily as a result of a reduction in the ARO liability at DPL's closed plants, Stuart and Killen32
Increase at IPL due to higher wholesale margins driven by Eagle Valley coming online and higher retail margins due to favorable weather23
Increase at Southland driven by higher market energy sales, partially offset by a decrease in capacity sales and lower ancillary services due to the expiration of long-term agreements12
Decrease at Hawaii primarily due to higher coal prices and lower gain on valuation of MTM commodity swaps(24)
Impact of the sale and closure of generation plants at DPL(12)
Decrease at IPL due to higher maintenance expense due to increased current year outages(21)
Other(5)
Total US and Utilities SBU Operating Margin Increase$40
Increase at Southland Energy primarily due to the CCGT units operating under active PPAs during the full 2021 period$100 
Increase at Southland primarily driven by increase in capacity sales and favorable price variances under the commercial hedging strategy, partially offset by unfavorable energy price adjustments due to market re-settlements83 
Increase in El Salvador due to higher demand mainly driven by the impact of COVID-19 in 202018 
Decrease at Clean Energy driven by increased costs associated with growing and accelerating the development pipeline, partially offset by higher revenue due to the Company's agreement to supply Google's data centers with 24/7 carbon-free energy(37)
Decrease at AES Indiana primarily due to higher maintenance and other fixed costs, partially offset by higher volumes from favorable weather(16)
Other
Total US and Utilities SBU Operating Margin Increase$154
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $55$40 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for a $24 millionNCI, primarily related to the sale of ownership interest in Southland Energy, and unrealized lossgains and losses on coal derivatives in Hawaii partially offset by restructuring charges in the prior year.derivatives.
Adjusted PTC increased $87$155 million, primarily driven by the increase in Adjusted Operating Margin described above, as well as an increase in the Company's share of earnings at Distributed Energyour U.S. renewables businesses due to new solar project growth,contributions from newly operational projects, lower interest expenses at Southland Energy attributable to NCI allocation in 2021, non-service pension income at AES Indiana, and lower interest expense and the HLBV allocation of noncontrolling interest earnings at Buffalo Gap,DPL. These increases were partially offset by lower allowance for equity funds used during constructiona gain in 2020 on sale of land held by AES Redondo Beach at IPALCO.Southland.


96 | 2021 Annual Report

Fiscal year 20172020 versus 20162019
Operating Margin decreased $26$116 million, or 4%15%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Decrease at DPL driven by lower retail margins due to lower regulated rates$(22)
Decrease at DPL primarily due to lower volumes due to the shutdown of Stuart Unit 1 and lower commercial availability

(21)
Decrease at IPL due to implementation of new base rates in Q2 2016 which resulted in a favorable change in accrual(18)
Increase at DPL as a result of lower depreciation expense due to lower PP&E carrying values from impairments in 2016 and 201726
Other9
Total US and Utilities SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(26)
Decrease at DPL due to lower regulated retail margin primarily due to changes to AES Ohio’s ESP and lower volumes mainly from milder weather$(63)
Decrease due to the sale and closure of generation facilities at DPL, including a credit to depreciation expense in 2019 as a result of a reduction to an ARO liability and cost recoveries from DPL's joint owners of Stuart and Killen in the prior year(50)
Decrease at Southland driven by higher losses from commodity derivatives and lower capacity sales due to unit retirements, partially offset by lower depreciation expense(47)
Decrease at AES Indiana primarily due to lower retail margin driven by lower volumes from milder weather and lower demand from the impact of COVID-19, partially offset by lower maintenance expense from scheduled plant outages(36)
Decrease at AES Hawaii primarily driven by lower availability due to increasing forced outages and higher expenses related to the shortened useful life of the coal plant(20)
Increase at Southland Energy due to the CCGT units beginning commercial operations during Q1 2020113 
Other(13)
Total US and Utilities SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(116)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $14$82 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivatives restructuring charges and costs associated with early plant closures.dispositions of business interests.
Adjusted PTC increased $32decreased $64 million, primarily driven by earnings from equity affiliates due to the 2017 acquisition of sPower, the Company's share of earnings at Distributed Energy due to new solar project growth and an increase in insurance recoveries at DPL. The increase in Adjusted PTC was partially offset by the decrease of $14 million in Adjusted Operating Margin described above and increased interest expense primarily at Southland Energy due to lower capitalized interest following completion of the CCGT units and new debt issuances, partially offset by a 2016 gain on contract terminationsale of land held by AES Redondo Beach at DP&L.Southland, lower pension expense at AES Indiana, and an increase in allocation of earnings from equity affiliates driven by renewable projects that came online in 2020 at sPower.



SOUTH AMERICASouth America SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted PTC (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 $ Change 2018 vs. 2017 % Change 2018 vs. 2017 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016For the Years Ended December 31,202120202019$ Change 2021 vs. 2020% Change 2021 vs. 2020$ Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2020 vs. 2019
Operating Margin $1,017
 $862
 $823
 $155
 18% $39
 5%Operating Margin$1,069 $1,243 $873 $(174)-14 %$370 42 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
 612
 500
 486
 112
 22% 14
 3%
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
432 550 499 (118)-21 %51 10 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
 519
 446
 428
 73
 16% 18
 4%
Adjusted PTC (1)
423 534 504 (111)-21 %30 %
_____________________________
(1)
A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.
(1)    A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses. AES' indirect beneficial interest in AES Brasil increased from 24.35% to 44.13% in 2020 and to 46.7% in 2021. See Item 1.BusinessSouth America SBUBrazil.
Fiscal year 20182021 versus 20172020
Operating Margin increased $155decreased $174 million, or 18%14%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Increase in Argentina mainly related to higher capacity prices resulting from market reforms enacted in 2017 and lower fixed costs primarily due to the devaluation of the Argentine peso$71
Increase in Colombia mainly related to higher contract pricing in 2018 and higher generation64
Margin on new PPAs in Chile at Gener, Angamos and Cochrane50
Impact of the sale of Electrica Santiago(38)
Lower fixed costs at Gener associated with planned maintenance performed in Q3 201721
Lower contract sales to distribution companies in Chile net of higher revenue associated with a contract termination(24)
Other11
Total South America SBU Operating Margin Increase$155
Lower margin in Brazil primarily due to the prior year GSF settlement gain and higher energy purchases led by drier hydrology$(251)
Recovery of previously expensed payments from customers in Chile(47)
Decrease in energy and capacity tariffs in Argentina, lower availability of TermoAndes, and higher fixed costs, partially offset by higher dispatch of San Nicolás and the commencement of operations of wind facilities(19)
Higher margin in Colombia related to higher reservoir levels and better hydrology80 
Increase in Chile primarily related to early contract terminations at Angamos and lower depreciation, partially offset by lower contract margin mainly related to higher spot prices on energy purchases coupled with lower availability63 
Total South America SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(174)
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $112decreased $118 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.NCI and net gains on early contract terminations at Angamos.
Adjusted PTC increased $73decreased $111 million, mainly due todriven by the increasedecrease in Adjusted Operating Margin described above, incremental capitalized interest at Alto Maipo in the prior period, lower equity earnings at Guacolda due to the suspension of equity method accounting, and lowerhigher interest expense in Chile,Brazil. These negative variances were partially offset by a $28 million decrease associated with a gain recognizedfavorable award in the prior year from the settlement of a legal dispute with YPF at Uruguaiana, higher interest expense in Brazil, lower equity earningsan arbitration proceeding in Chile and higher realized foreign currency lossesinterest income in Argentina.Argentina due to increase in rates and higher sales.


97 | 2021 Annual Report

Fiscal year 20172020 versus 20162019
Including the favorable impact of foreign currency translation and remeasurement of $38 million, Operating Margin increased $39$370 million, or 5%42%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Start of operations at Cochrane Units I and II in July and October 2016, respectively$72
Higher capacity payments in Argentina primarily due to changes in regulation in 201764
Net impact of volume and prices of lower energy purchased in spot market at Tietê71
Higher contract sales at Chivor primarily due to an increase in contracted capacity at higher prices35
Higher volume due to acquisition of new wind entities - Alto Sertão II23
Favorable FX impacts at Tietê21
Net impact of volume and prices of bilateral contracts due to higher energy purchased at Tietê(100)
Negative impact in Gener due to new regulation on emissions (Green Taxes)(41)
Lower spot sales at Chivor mainly due to lower generation and lower spot prices(37)
Lower availability of efficient generation resulting in higher replacement energy and fixed costs, mainly associated with major maintenance at Ventanas Complex in Chile(29)
Lower margin at the SING market primarily due to lower contract sales and increase in coal prices at Norgener partially offset by higher spot sales(21)
Lower generation at CTSN mainly due to lower demand(26)
Other7
Total South America SBU Operating Margin Increase$39
Increase in Chile primarily related to early contract terminations at Angamos$302 
Increase in Brazil mainly due to a reduction in cost of sales as a result of a revision to the GSF liability, partially offset by depreciation of the Brazilian real against the USD140 
Recovery of previously expensed payments from customers in Chile57 
Lower reservoir levels as a result of the life extension project at Chivor during Q1 2020 and drier hydrology in Colombia(108)
Lower capacity prices (Resolution 31/2020) in Argentina partially offset by the impact of new wind projects beginning commercial operations in 2020(21)
Total South America SBU Operating Margin Increase$370
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $14$51 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.NCI and the net gains on early contract terminations at Angamos.
Adjusted PTC increased $18$30 million, mainly driven by a $28 million increase from the settlement of a legal dispute with YPF at Uruguaiana in 2017 and the $14 million increase in Adjusted Operating Margin described above, as well as foreign currency gains in Argentina associated with the collection of financing receivables, prepayment of financial debt denominated in U.S. dollars in 2017 and lower foreign currency losses associated with the sale of Argentina’s sovereign bondsinterest expense due to incremental capitalized interest at Termoandes.Alto Maipo. These positive impacts were partially offset by realized FX losses and lower interest income primarily driven by lower interest rates on CAMMESA receivables in Argentina, and higher interest expense mainlyin Brazil due to the acquisition of Alto Sertão II debt, issuance of debt at Argentina and lower interest capitalization in Cochrane and Chivor, and the write-off of water rights at Gener resulting from a business development project that is no longer pursued.higher inflation rates.



MCAC SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted PTC (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 $ Change 2018 vs. 2017 % Change 2018 vs. 2017 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016For the Years Ended December 31,202120202019$ Change 2021 vs. 2020% Change 2021 vs. 2020$ Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2020 vs. 2019
Operating Margin $534
 $465
 $390
 $69
 15% $75
 19%Operating Margin$521 $559 $487 $(38)-7 %$72 15 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
 391
 358
 292
 33
 9% 66
 23%
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
398 394 352 %42 12 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
 300
 277
 222
 23
 8% 55
 25%
Adjusted PTC (1)
314 287 367 27 %(80)-22 %
_____________________________
(1)    A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.
Fiscal year 2021 versus 2020
Operating Margin decreased $38 million, or 7%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Decrease in the Dominican Republic mainly driven by the sale of Itabo on April 8, 2021$(64)
Decrease in Mexico driven by lower availability and higher fixed costs(29)
Increase in the Dominican Republic driven by higher LNG sales mainly due to Eastern Pipeline COD in 2020 and positive LNG buyback from BP for December 2021 cargo, partially offset by lower capacity due to the incorporation of new plants into the system and higher fixed costs48 
Increase in Panama mainly driven by Panama's demand recovery, new wind and solar projects, higher capacity prices, and lower fixed costs, partially offset by the Estrella del Mar I power barge disconnection in July 2020, higher cost of gas, and drier hydrology in 2021, mainly during Q411 
(1)
OtherA non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See S(4)
BU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures Total MCAC SBU Operating Margin Decreasefor definition and Item 1.$(38)Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $4 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC increased $27 million, mainly driven by the increase in Adjusted Operating Margin described above, as well as a legal settlement in Panama in 2020 and a current year gain on pension plan buyout in Mexico.


98 | 2021 Annual Report

Fiscal year 20182020 versus 20172019
Operating Margin increased $69$72 million, or 15%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Increase in Dominican Republic due to higher spot prices$32
Higher contracted energy sales in Panama mainly driven by the commencement of operations at the Colon combined cycle facility in September 201821
Higher availability driven by improved hydrology in Panama17
Higher contracted energy sales in Dominican Republic mainly driven by the commencement of operations at the Los Mina combined cycle facility in June 2017 and lower forced maintenance outages12
Decrease in Mexico due to pension plan pass-through adjustments and higher fuel costs(8)
Other(5)
Total MCAC SBU Operating Margin Increase$69
Higher availability in Panama mainly due to the outage of Changuinola in 2019 for the tunnel lining upgrade$63 
Increase in Panama driven by improved hydrology resulting in higher net spot market sales43 
Increase in Dominican Republic due to higher LNG sales margin driven by the Eastern Pipeline COD in 202027 
Increase in Panama mainly driven by higher availability and capacity tank revenue and lower fixed costs, partially offset by lower energy sales margin at the Colon combined cycle plant
Decrease in Dominican Republic related to Andres facility due to steam turbine failure in 2020 and business interruption insurance recovered in 2019(49)
Decrease in Panama driven by lower margin at the Estrella de Mar I power barge mainly due to disconnection from the grid in August 2020(26)
Other
Total MCAC SBU Operating Margin Increase$72
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $33$42 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC increased $23decreased $80 million, mainly driven by insurance recoveries associated with property damage at Andres and Changuinola in 2019, partially offset by the increase in Adjusted Operating Margin as described above, partially offset by lower capitalized interest due to project completions in Panama and Dominican Republic and lower foreign currency gains in Mexico.
Fiscal year 2017 versus 2016
Operating Margin increased $75 million, or 19%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Higher contracted energy sales in Dominican Republic net of LNG fuel consumption, mainly driven by Los Mina combined cycle commencement of operations in June 2017$34
Higher availability driven by improved hydrology in Panama

26
Higher availability in Mexico mainly driven by unplanned maintenance in 201613
Other2
Total MCAC SBU Operating Margin Increase$75
Adjusted Operating Margin increased $66 million primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC increased $55 million, driven by the increase in Adjusted Operating Margin of $66 million as described above.
EURASIAEurasia SBU
The following table summarizes Operating Margin, Adjusted Operating Margin and Adjusted PTC (in millions) for the periods indicated:
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 $ Change 2018 vs. 2017 % Change 2018 vs. 2017 $ Change 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2017 vs. 2016For the Years Ended December 31,202120202019$ Change 2021 vs. 2020% Change 2021 vs. 2020$ Change 2020 vs. 2019% Change 2020 vs. 2019
Operating Margin $227
 $422
 $427
 $(195) -46 % $(5) -1 %Operating Margin$216 $186 $188 $30 16 %$(2)-1 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
 194
 306
 303
 (112) -37 % 3
 1 %
Adjusted Operating Margin (1)
162 142 148 20 14 %(6)-4 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
 222
 290
 283
 (68) -23 % 7
 2 %
Adjusted PTC (1)
196 177 159 19 11 %18 11 %
_____________________________
(1)
(1)    A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business
A non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted for the impact of NCI. See SBU Performance Analysis—Non-GAAP Measures for definition and Item 1.Business for the respective ownership interest for key businesses.


Fiscal year 20182021 versus 20172020
Including favorable FX impacts of $8 million, Operating Margin decreased $195increased $30 million, or 46%16%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Impact of the sale of Masinloc power plant in March 2018

$(122)
Impact of the sale of the Kazakhstan CHPs and the expiration of HPP concession in 2017

(36)
Decrease in Vietnam due to adoption of the new revenue recognition standard in 2018 and higher maintenance costs

(33)
Other(4)
Total Eurasia SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(195)
Increase at Kavarna and Maritza primarily driven by higher electricity prices in Bulgaria and higher generation$19 
Improved operational performance at Mong Duong
Other
Total Eurasia SBU Operating Margin Increase$30
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $112increased $20 million or 37%, primarily due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC increased $19 million driven by the increase in Adjusted Operating Margin described above.
Fiscal year 2020 versus 2019
Operating Margin decreased $68$2 million, or 1%, which was driven primarily by the following (in millions):
Impact of the sale of Kilroot and Ballylumford businesses in June 2019$(6)
Other
Total Eurasia SBU Operating Margin Decrease$(2)
Adjusted Operating Margin decreased $6 million due to the drivers above, adjusted for NCI.
Adjusted PTC increased $18 million, primarily driven by lower interest expense due to regular debt repayments in Bulgaria and a positive variance in OPGC equity earnings, partially offset by the decrease in Adjusted Operating Margin discussed above, partially offset by the positive impact in Vietnam due to increased interest income from the higher financing component of contract consideration as a result of adoption of the new revenue recognition standard in 2018. See Note 1—above.

General and Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesNew Accounting Standards Adopted included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.

99 | 2021 Annual Report
Fiscal year 2017 versus 2016
Operating Margin decreased $5 million, or 1%, and Adjusted Operating Margin increased $3 million, or 1%, with no material drivers.
Adjusted PTC increased $7 million, primarily driven by the increase in Adjusted Operating Margin, adjusted for NCI and excluding unrealized gains and losses on derivatives.
Key Trends and Uncertainties
During 20192022 and beyond, we expect to face the following challenges at certain of our businesses. Management expects that improved operating performance at certain businesses, growth from new businesses, and global cost reduction initiatives may lessen or offset their impact. If these favorable effects do not occur, or if the challenges described below and elsewhere in this section impact us more significantly than we currently anticipate, or if volatile foreign currencies and commodities move more unfavorably, then these adverse factors (or other adverse factors unknown to us) may have a material impact on our operating margin, net income attributable to The AES Corporation and cash flows. We continue to monitor our operations and address challenges as they arise. For the risk factors related to our business, see Item 1.—Business and Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K.
Operational
COVID-19 Pandemic — The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted global economic activity, including electricity and energy consumption, and caused significant volatility in financial markets intermittently in the last two years. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic we have conducted our essential operations without significant disruption. We derive approximately 85% of our total revenues from our regulated utilities and long-term sales and supply contracts or PPAs at our generation businesses, which contributes to a relatively stable revenue and cost structure at most of our businesses. In 2021, our operational locations continued to experience the impact of, and recovery from, the COVID-19 pandemic. Across our global portfolio, our utilities businesses have generally performed in line with our expectations consistent with a recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. While we cannot predict the length and magnitude of the pandemic, including the impact of current or future variants, or how it could impact global economic conditions, a delayed recovery with respect to demand may adversely impact our financial results for 2022. Also see Item 1A.—Risk Factors of this Form 10-K.
We continue to monitor and manage our credit exposures in a prudent manner. Our credit exposures have continued in-line with historical levels and within the customary 45-60 day grace period. We have not experienced material credit-related impacts from our PPA offtakers due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our supply chain management has remained robust during this challenging time and we continue to closely manage and monitor developments. We continue to experience certain minor delays in some of our development projects, primarily in permitting processes and the implementation of interconnections, due to governments and other authorities having limited capacity to perform their functions.
Operational Sensitivity to Dry Hydrological Conditions — Our hydroelectric generation facilities are sensitive to changes in the weather, particularly the level of water inflows into generation facilities. While our operations in Panama, Colombia, Brazil, and Chile have experienced challenges arising from dry hydrology from time to time, the current dry hydrological conditions in Brazil have exceeded historical levels. If these hydrological conditions continue to persist, we may need to purchase energy at higher prices to fulfill our contractual arrangements.
Trade Restrictions and Supply Chain — In recent years, increased tensions between the U.S. and China have resulted in policies that restrict or increase costs on trade, such as tariffs and import restrictions, that have impacted the renewable energy industry. While we have been able to largely mitigate any material impacts so far, China is the largest supplier of raw materials and components used in solar panels. Imports of solar panels into the U.S. from China and Southeast Asia have been delayed or challenged in certain instances. In addition, substantial shortages in shipping services and disruptions in global supply chain, recent disruptions specific to solar panel imports including the uncertainty around the application of additional tariffs on solar panel imports from Southeast Asia, and the potential detainment of panels by U.S. Customs and Border Protection has further challenged the supply chain related to renewable energy. While we have contracted and substantially secured our expected requirements for U.S. solar panels for 2022, these disruptions may persist and impact our suppliers’ ability or willingness to meet their contractual agreements. AES will continue to monitor developments and take prudent steps towards maintaining a robust supply chain for our renewables projects.
Macroeconomic and Political
The macroeconomic and political environments in some countries where our subsidiaries conduct business have changed during 2018.2021. This could result in significant impacts to tax laws and environmental and energy policies. Additionally, we operate in multiple countries and as such are subject to volatility in exchange rates at the


100 | 2021 Annual Report

subsidiary level. See Item 7A.—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for further information.
United States Tax Law ReformArgentina— In the run up to the 2019 Presidential elections, the Argentine peso devalued significantly and the government of Argentina imposed capital controls and announced a restructuring of Argentina’s debt payments. Restrictions on the flow of capital have limited the availability of international credit, and economic conditions in Argentina have further deteriorated, triggering additional devaluation of the Argentine peso and a deterioration of the country’s risk profile. Following the election of Alberto Fernández in October 2019, the administration has been evaluating solutions to the Argentine economic crisis. On February 27, 2020, the Secretariat of Energy passed Resolution No. 31/2020 that includes the denomination of tariffs in local currency indexed by local inflation, and reductions in capacity payments received by generators. These regulatory changes have negatively impacted our financial results. In addition, Argentina restructured its public debt in 2020 through an agreement with its international creditors. Although the situation in Argentina remains challenging, it has not had a material impact on our current exposures to date, and payments on the long-term receivables for the FONINVEMEM Agreements are current. For further information, see Note 7—Financing Receivables in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.
In
Chile — On December 2017,19, 2021, Gabriel Boric was elected president of Chile with 56 percent of the United States enactedvote in the TCJA. The legislation significantly revisedsecond round. Boric will take office on March 11, 2022, after two years of political and social turmoil in Chile driven by massive protests over inequality, leading the U.S. corporatecountry through the process of writing a new constitution. Boric has declared his goal of introducing significant reforms in key areas such as pensions, education, labor, and health services. To mitigate the fiscal impact of these initiatives, Boric also declared his intention to introduce a tax reform to increase mining royalties and increase income, tax system by,emissions, and wealth taxes among other things, loweringchanges. These and other initiatives could result in regulatory or policy changes that may affect our results of operations in Chile.
The Chilean government held a referendum in October 2020, which determined that a new constitution will be drafted by a constitutional convention. A second vote was held alongside municipal and gubernatorial elections in April 2021 to elect the corporate income tax rate, introducingmembers of the constitutional convention. A third vote, which is expected to occur in 2022, would accept or reject the new limitations on interest expense deductions, subjecting foreign earningsconstitution after it is drafted.
In November 2019, the Chilean government enacted Law 21,185 that establishes a Stabilization Fund for regulated energy prices. Historically, the government updated the prices for regulated energy contracts every six months to reflect the indexation the contracts have to exchange rates and commodities prices. The new law freezes regulated prices and does not allow the pass-through of these contractual indexation updates to customers beyond the pricing in effect at July 1, 2019, until new lower-cost renewable contracts are incorporated into pricing in 2023. Consequently, costs incurred in excess of the July 1, 2019 price will be accumulated and borne by generators. The receivables will be paid by distribution companies and the face value will be recognized by a Tariff Decree issued by the regulator every six months. In December 2020, AES Andes executed an allowable return to current U.S. taxation, and adopting a semi-territorial corporate tax system. These changes impacted our 2018 effective tax rate and will materially impact our effective tax rate in future periods. Furthermore, we anticipate that higher U.S. tax expense may fully utilize our remaining net operating loss carryforwards inagreement for the near term, which could lead to material cash tax payments in the United States. Specific provisionssale of the TCJA and their potential impacts onreceivables generated pursuant the Company are noted below. Our interpretation of the TCJA may change as the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service issue additional guidance. Such changes may be material.
Transition TaxTariff Stabilization Law at a discount. See Note 7Financing Receivables— As further explained in Note 21—Income Taxes included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K we have concluded our analysis of the implementation impacts of the TCJA and included adjustments to our previous estimates in accordance with the guidance of SAB 118. Our revised estimates took into account interpretative guidance issued in 2018 by the U.S. Treasury in proposed regulations. In the first quarter of 2019, the U.S. Treasury issued final regulations related to the one-time transition tax whichfor further amended the guidance of the proposed regulations. We are still evaluating the final regulations which may have a material impact on our financial statements. The impacts of the final regulations will be reflected in our financial statements during the quarter ended March 31, 2019.information.
Limitation on Interest Expense Deductions— The TCJA introduced a new limitation on the deductibility of net interest expense beginning January 1, 2018. The deduction will be limited to interest income, plus 30 percent of tax basis EBITDA through 2021 (30 percent of EBIT beginning January 1, 2022). This determination is made at the consolidated group level, although it applies separately to partnerships. While interest expense of regulated utilities may be exempt from the limitation, the proposed regulations issued by the U.S. Treasury in 2018 would effectively limit interest expense of our U.S. utilities. The proposed regulations may change before they are fully enacted in final form and are not retroactive; we have not early adopted the proposed regulations. Given typical project financing and current U.S. holding company debt levels, we anticipate that this limitation will materially, negatively impact our effective tax rate.
Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (“GILTI”) —The TCJA subjects the earnings of foreign subsidiaries to current U.S. taxation to the extent that those earnings exceed an allowable economic return on investment. The foreign earnings subject to current taxation under the GILTI provision are not limited to those derived from intangible property and may include gains derived from some future asset sales. The GILTI provision will subject a significant portion of our foreign earnings to current U.S. taxation. In 2018, the GILTI provision materially, negatively impacted our effective tax rate and we expect this to continue in future years. Prospectively, the consequences of the new GILTI provision may be partially mitigated by foreign tax credits. Proposed regulations


were issued in 2018 by the U.S. Treasury which provided further guidance on GILTI and the related foreign tax credit, however there are further regulations expected and they may change before enacted in final form.
State TaxesThe reactions of the individual states to federal tax reform are still evolving. Most states will assess whether and how the federal changes will be incorporated into their state tax legislation. Some states have already decided whether to conform to new provisions of the federal tax law, such as the one-time transition tax and GILTI, while many other states have not yet enacted final legislation. As we expect higher taxable income in the future due to the federal changes, this may also lead to higher state taxable income. Our current state tax provisions predominantly have full valuation allowances against state net operating losses. These positions will be re-assessed in the future as state tax law evolves and may result in material changes in position.
Tax Equity Structures — Our U.S. renewable energy portfolio operates primarily through tax equity partnerships. We cannot be certain of the impacts U.S. tax reform may have on availability or pricing of tax equity for future growth opportunities. Impacts of provisions such as the lower tax rate and immediate expensing may impact the amount and timing of returns allocable to our partners in our existing tax equity structures.
Puerto Rico — Our subsidiaries in Puerto Rico have a long-term PPAPPAs with state-owned PREPA, which has been facing economic challenges that could result in a material adverse effect on our business in Puerto Rico.
The Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) was enacted to create a structure for exercising federal oversight over the fiscal affairs of U.S. territories and created procedures for adjusting debt accumulated by the Puerto Rico government and, potentially, other territories (“Title III”). Finally, PROMESA also expedites the approval of key energy projects and other critical projects in Puerto Rico.
PROMESA allowed for the establishment of an Oversight Board with broad powers of budgetary and financial control over Puerto Rico. The Oversight Board filed for bankruptcy on behalf of PREPA under Title III in July 2017. As a result of the bankruptcy filing, AES Puerto Rico and AES Ilumina’s non-recourse debt of $317$201 million and $34$29 million, respectively, continue to be in technical default and are classified as current as of December 31, 2018.2021. The Company is in compliance with its debt payment obligations as of December 31, 2018.2021.
AfterOn January 2, 2020, the eventsGovernor of Hurricanes Irma and Maria in September 2017, Puerto Rico’s infrastructure was severely damaged, including electric infrastructure and transmission lines. AES Puerto Rico resumed generation duringsigned a bill that prohibits the disposal and unencapsulated beneficial use of coal combustion residuals in Puerto Rico. Prior to this bill's approval, the Company had put in place arrangements to dispose or beneficially use its coal ash and combustion residual outside of Puerto Rico.
New factors arose in the first quarter of 20182021 associated with the economic costs and continues to beoperational and reputational risks of disposal of coal combustion residuals off island. In addition, new legislative initiatives surrounding the lowest cost and EPA compliant energy providerprohibition of coal generation assets in Puerto Rico and a critical supplierwere introduced. Collectively, these factors


101 | 2021 Annual Report

along with management’s decision on how to PREPA. According to the US Federal Emergency Management Agency, asbest achieve our decarbonization goals resulted in an indicator of January 2019 PREPA's recovery status isimpairment at 99%.
The Company's receivable balancesits asset group in Puerto Rico as of December 31, 2018 totaled $68 million, of which $18 million was overdue. DespiteRico. The Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the disruption caused by the hurricanes and the Title III protection, PREPA has been making substantially allcarrying amount of its payments tocoal-fired long-lived assets was not recoverable. As a result, the generators in line with historical payment patterns.
A proposed Energy Public Policy law was introduced in October 2018 which includes the eliminationCompany recognized asset impairment expense of coal as a source for electricity generation by January 1, 2028 and the accelerated deployment of renewables (20% by 2025; 50% by 2040 and 100% by 2050). AES Puerto Rico's long-term PPA with PREPA expires December 31, 2027. Puerto Rico's Senate and House of Representatives are still debating certain amendments.$475 million.
Considering the information available as of the filing date, Managementmanagement believes the carrying amount of our long-lived assets in Puerto Rico of $598$79 million is recoverable as of December 31, 2018.2021.
Argentina — During the second quarter of 2018, all of the three-year cumulative inflation rates commonly used to evaluate Argentina’s inflation exceeded 100%. Therefore, Argentina’s economy was determined to be highly inflationary. Since the tariffs and debt at our primary businesses in Argentina are denominated in USD, the functional currency of those businesses is USD. As such, the determination that the Argentina economy is highly inflationary is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
United Kingdom — In June 2016, the UK held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the EU, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” In January 2019, the UK parliament rejected a proposed withdrawal agreement that the EU had supported. The UK is expected to exit the EU on March 29, 2019. While the full impact of the Brexit remains uncertain, these changes are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our operations and consolidated financial results.
LIBOR Phase OutReference Rate Reform — In July 2017, the UKUnited Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority announced thethat it intends to phase out of LIBOR byLIBOR. In the end of 2021. TheU.S., the Alternative Reference Rate Committee at the Federal Reserve is workingidentified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR; alternative reference rates in other key markets are under development. On March 5, 2021, the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") announced the future cessation or non-representativeness of the LIBOR benchmark settings, to establishcease publication of one-week and two-month USD LIBOR rates by December 31, 2021, and extending the cessation dates for the overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month, and 12-month USD LIBOR rates through June 30, 2023. AES holds a new benchmark replacement rate. While AES maintains financial instruments that usesubstantial amount of debt and derivative contracts referencing LIBOR as an interest rate


benchmark. In order to facilitate an organized transition from LIBOR to alternative benchmark rate(s), AES has established a process to measure and mitigate risks associated with the full impactcessation of LIBOR. As part of this initiative, alternative benchmark rates have been, and continue to be, assessed, and implemented for newly executed agreements. Many of AES’ existing agreements include provisions designed to facilitate an orderly transition from LIBOR, and interest rate derivatives address the LIBOR transition through the adoption of the phase out is uncertain until a new replacement benchmark is determinedISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol and implementation plans are more fully developed.subsequent amendments. To the extent that the terms of the credit agreements and derivative instruments do not align following the cessation of LIBOR rates, AES will seek to negotiate contract amendments with counterparties or additional derivatives contracts.
Regulatory
Maritza PPA ReviewGlobal Tax — The DG Comp continuesmacroeconomic and political environments in the U.S. and some countries where our subsidiaries conduct business have changed during 2020 and 2021. This could result in significant impacts to review whether Maritza’s PPA with NEK is compliant withtax law. For example, the European Commission’s state aid rules. Although no formal investigation has been launched by DG Comp to date, Maritza has engaged“American Rescue Plan Act of 2021” was signed into law on March 11, 2021. The $1.9 trillion act includes COVID-19 relief as well as broader stimulus, but also includes several revenue-raising and business tax provisions. Two corporate income tax increases partially offset the cost of the bill: the elimination of a beneficial foreign tax credit rule, and the expansion of executive compensation deduction limits effective in discussions with the DG Comp case team and representatives of Bulgaria to discuss the agency’s review. 2027.
In the near term, Maritza expectsthird quarter of 2021, both the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives passed $3.5 trillion budget resolutions as a first step to the budget reconciliation process that it will engage in discussions with Bulgaria to attempt to reach a negotiated resolution concerning DG Comp’s review. The anticipated discussions could involve a range of potential outcomes, including but not limited to terminationinclude U.S. corporate and international tax reforms. As part of the PPAreconciliation process, the House Ways and payment of some level of compensation to Maritza. Any negotiated resolution would be subject to mutually acceptable terms, lender consent, and DG Comp approval. At this time, we cannot predict the outcomeMeans Committee marked up a version of the anticipated discussions between Maritza“Build Back Better Act”. The Build Back Better Act included U.S. corporate and Bulgaria, nor can we predict how DG Comp might resolve its review ifinternational tax reform proposals that would increase the discussions fail to resultU.S. corporate income tax rate, modify the GILTI rules, create additional interest deduction limitations and provide clean energy incentives, among others. The Company believes it would benefit from the clean energy initiatives, though the tax implications may be unfavorable in an agreement concerning the review. Maritza believes that its PPA is legal and in compliance with all applicable laws, and it will take all actions necessary to protect its interests, whether through negotiated agreement or otherwise. However, there can be no assurances that this matter will be resolved favorably; if it is not, there could be a material adverse impact on Maritza’s and the Company’s respective financial statements.
Considering the information available asshort term. As of the filing date, Management believesthis legislation has not been voted on in the carrying valueUnited States Senate.
With respect to international tax reform, in the third quarter of our long-lived assets2021,132 member countries of the OECD “Inclusive Framework” group released a statement announcing a coordinated framework that would reallocate taxing rights over the profits of multinational corporations and establish a global minimum tax at Maritzaa 15% rate. On December 20, 2021 the OECD released a set of approximately $1.1 billion is recoverableModel Rules related to the so-called Pillar 2 global minimum tax known as the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE). On December 22, 2021, the European Commission proposed a draft Directive establishing a global minimum level of taxation. The proposal, if approved by all 27 EU Member States, would require each Member State to transpose the Directive into their respective national laws by December 31, 2022 for the Income Inclusion Rule to come into effect as of December 31, 2018.
Foreign Exchange
We operate in multiple countriesJanuary 1, 2023 and as such are subjectthe Under Taxed Payments Rule to volatility in exchange rates at varying degrees atcome into effect January 1, 2024. The Subject to Tax Rule was excluded from the subsidiary level and between our functional currency,draft Directive. These Rules, collectively, comprise the USD, and currenciesmain facets of the countriesGloBE. The potential impact to the Company is not known, but may be material. Implementation of the framework would require multilateral agreement and/or country specific legislative action, including in the U.S.
Inflation — In the markets in which we operate. In 2018,operate, there was a significant devaluationhave been higher rates of inflation in recent months. While most of our contracts in our international businesses are indexed to inflation, in general, our U.S.-based generation contracts are not indexed to inflation. If inflation continues to increase in our markets, it may increase our expenses that we may not be able to pass through to customers. It may also increase the Argentine peso against the USD, which had an impact oncosts of some of our 2018 results. Continued material devaluation of the Argentine peso against the USD could have an impact on our future results. For additional information, refer to Item 7A.—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.


102 | 2021 Annual Report

development projects that could negatively impact their competitiveness. Our utility businesses do allow for recovering of operations and maintenance costs through the regulatory process, which may have timing impacts on recovery.
Alto Maipo
The Company's subsidiary, Alto Maipo, is currently constructing a hydroelectric facility near Santiago, Chile which is approximately 99% complete and started generating energy in the fourth quarter of 2021 as part of the commissioning process. The Alto Maipo project (the “Project”) has experienced cost overrunssignificant construction difficulties, which have resulted in increased projecteda substantial increase in project costs over the original $2 billion budget. Construction atbudget and led to a series of negotiations that resulted in securing additional funding from creditors and additional equity injections from AES Andes.
On March 17, 2017, Alto Maipo completed the project is continuing,first financial and legal restructuring of the project is 75% complete. Project. Following this restructuring, Alto Maipo terminated a construction contract with Constructora Nuevo Maipo S.A. (“CNM”) as a result of CNM’s failure to perform. On July 3, 2017, CNM filed a claim against Alto Maipo before the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) for cost overruns and contract termination. Prior to this claim, Alto Maipo issued an arbitration request before the ICC for multiple contract breaches by CNM. See Item 3.—Legal Proceedingsin this Form 10-K for further information and status of the proceedings.
In February 2018, Alto Maipo entered into a new constructionsigned an amended EPC contract with Strabag.Strabag, which increased the scope of the original contract to incorporate CNM’s work and was approved by the creditors in May 2018 as part of the second restructuring of the Project.
On August 27, 2021, Alto Maipo updated its creditors with respect to the construction budget and long-term business plan for the Project, which considers different scenarios for spot prices, decarbonization initiatives, and hydrological conditions, among other significant variables. Under some of these scenarios, Alto Maipo may experience reduced future cash flows, which would limit its ability to repay debt. Alto Maipo’s management initiated negotiations with its creditors to restructure its obligations and achieve a sustainable long-term capital structure for Alto Maipo.
On November 17, 2021, Alto Maipo SpA commenced a reorganization proceeding in accordance with Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, through a voluntary petition. Consequently, after Chapter 11 filing, The new contractAES Corporation is fixed-price and lump sum, transfers geological and construction riskno longer considered to Strabag and provides a date certain for completion with strong performance and completion guarantees.
In May 2018,have control over Alto Maipo and, therefore, derecognized Alto Maipo from its Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognized an after-tax loss of approximately $1.2 billion, net of noncontrolling interests, in the project's senior lenders executedConsolidated Statement of Operations in the financialfourth quarter of 2021, associated with the loss of control attributable to the former controlling interest.
Alto Maipo is party to a restructuring support agreement to which holders of more than 78% of the project. The restructuring, among other things, includes additional funding commitmentsoutstanding senior indebtedness are party, and which contemplates a plan of up to $400 millionreorganization in which AES Andes will own all of which $200 million was already contributed by AES Gener. Any unused portionthe equity of AES Gener's commitment will be used to prepay project debt.
the reorganized company. If Alto Maipo is unable to renegotiate the terms of its financial arrangements with its creditors and is unable to meet its obligations under those arrangements as they come due, the creditors may enforce their rights under the credit agreements. These finance agreements are non-recourse with respect to The AES Corporation.
Decarbonization Initiatives
Several initiatives have been announced by regulators and offtakers in recent years, with the intention of reducing GHG emissions generated by the energy industry. Our strategy of shifting towards clean energy platforms, including renewable energy, energy storage, LNG, and modernized grids is designed to position us for continued growth while reducing our carbon intensity. The shift to renewables has caused certain construction milestones, therecustomers to migrate to other low-carbon energy solutions and this trend may continue. Certain of our contracts contain clauses designed to compensate for early contract terminations, but we cannot guarantee full recovery. In February 2022, the Company announced its intent to exit coal generation by year-end 2025 versus our prior expectation of a reduction to below 10% by year-end 2025, subject to necessary approvals. Although the Company cannot currently estimate the financial impact of these decarbonization initiatives, new legislative or regulatory programs further restricting carbon emissions could berequire material capital expenditures, result in a reduction of the estimated useful life of certain coal facilities, or have other material impactadverse effects on our financial results. For further discussion of our strategy of shifting towards clean energy platforms see Item 1—Executive Summary.
Chilean Decarbonization PlanThe Chilean government has announced an initiative to phase out coal power plants by 2040 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. On June 4, 2019, AES Andes signed an agreement


103 | 2021 Annual Report

with the Chilean government to cease the operation of two coal units for a total of 322 MW as part of the phase-out. Under the agreement, Ventanas 1 (114 MW) will cease operation in November 2022 and Ventanas 2 (208 MW) in May 2024; however AES Andes has announced its intention to accelerate the disconnection of these units. On December 26, 2020, the Chilean government issued Supreme Decree Number 42, which allows coal plants to remain connected to the financinggrid in “strategic reserve status” for five years after ceasing operations, receive a reduced capacity payment, and valuedispatch, if necessary, to ensure the electric system’s reliability. On December 29, 2020, Ventanas 1 ceased operation and entered "strategic reserve status." Ventanas 2 is also expected to enter "strategic reserve status" in September 2022. On July 6, 2021, AES Andes and the Chilean government signed an amendment to the decarbonization agreement to include the Ventanas 3 (267 MW), Ventanas 4 (270 MW), Angamos 1 (277 MW), and Angamos 2 (281 MW) plants. The plants will be available for disconnection after January 2025, subject to system reliability and sufficiency. The Company performed an impairment analysis at June 30, 2021 and determined the carrying amounts of these asset groups were not recoverable. As a result, AES Andes recognized asset impairment expense of $804 million ($540 million net of NCI). See Item 1—BusinessSouth America SBUChilefor further discussion. Considering the information available as of the project which could have a material impact on the Company. The carrying value of long-lived assets and deferred tax assets of Alto Maipo as of December 31, 2018 was approximately $2 billion and $60 million, respectively. Managementfiling date, management believes the carrying valueamount of theour coal-fired long-lived asset groupassets in Chile of $1.1 billion is recoverable as of December 31, 2018. 2021.
Puerto Rico Energy Public Policy Act On April 11, 2019, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed the Puerto Rico Energy Public Policy Act (“the Act”) establishing guidelines for grid efficiency and eliminating coal as a source for electricity generation by January 1, 2028. The Act supports the accelerated deployment of renewables through the Renewable Portfolio Standard and the conversion of coal generating facilities to other fuel sources, with compliance targets of 40% by 2025, 60% by 2040, and 100% by 2050. AES Puerto Rico’s long-term PPA with PREPA expires November 30, 2027. PREPA and AES Puerto Rico have discussed different strategic alternatives, but have yet to reach any agreement. Any agreement that may be reached would be subject to lender and regulatory approval, including that of the Oversight Board that filed for bankruptcy on behalf of PREPA. As described under Macroeconomic and Political above, additional factors arose in the first quarter of 2021 with respect to the disposal of coal combustion residuals, which contributed to the Company recognizing an asset impairment expense of $475 million. Considering the information available as of the filing date, management believes the carrying amount of our long-lived assets in Puerto Rico of $79 million is recoverable as of December 31, 2021.
Hawaii In addition, ManagementJuly 2020, the Hawaii State Legislature passed a bill that will prohibit AES Hawaii from generating electricity from coal after December 31, 2022. This bill will restrict the Company from contracting the asset beyond the expiration of its existing PPA, and as a result, AES plans to retire the AES Hawaii coal facility in 2022. Considering the information available as of the filing date, management believes the carrying amount of our coal-fired long-lived assets in Hawaii of $14 million is recoverable as of December 31, 2021.
For further information about the risks associated with decarbonization initiatives, see Item 1A.—Risk FactorsConcerns about GHG emissions and the potential risks associated with climate change have led to increased regulation and other actions that could impact our businesses included in this Form 10-K.
Regulatory
AES Maritza PPA Review— DG Comp is conducting a preliminary review of whether AES Maritza’s PPA with NEK is compliant with the European Union's State Aid rules. No formal investigation has been launched by DG Comp to date. However, AES Maritza has been engaging in discussions with the DG Comp case team and the Government of Bulgaria ("GoB") to attempt to reach a negotiated resolution of the DG Comp’s review ("PPA Discussions"). The PPA Discussions are ongoing and the PPA continues to remain in place. However, there can be no assurance that, in the context of the PPA Discussions, the other parties will not seek a prompt termination of the PPA.
We do not believe termination of the PPA is justified. Nevertheless, the PPA Discussions involve a range of potential outcomes, including but not limited to the termination of the PPA and payment of some level of compensation to AES Maritza. Any negotiated resolution would be subject to mutually acceptable terms, lender consent, and DG Comp approval. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of the PPA Discussions or when those discussions will conclude. Nor can we predict how DG Comp might resolve its review if the PPA Discussions fail to result in an agreement concerning the agency's review. AES Maritza believes that its PPA is legal and in compliance with all applicable laws, and it will take all actions necessary to protect its interests, whether through negotiated


104 | 2021 Annual Report

agreement or otherwise. However, there can be no assurance that this matter will be resolved favorably; if it is more likely than not, the deferred tax assets will be realized; however, the deferred tax assetsthere could be reduced if estimatesa material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of future taxable income are decreased.
Andres
On September 3, 2018, lightning affected the Andres 319 MW combined cycle natural gas facility in the Dominican Republic (“the Plant”) resulting in significant damage to its steam turbineoperation, and generator. The Company has business interruption and property damage insurance coverage, subject to pre-defined deductibles, under its existing programs.
On September 25, 2018, the Plant restarted operations running the gas turbine in simple cycle at partial load of approximately 120 MW. Management estimates that the Plant will operate the gas turbine in simple cycle at full load of approximately 185 MW starting in the second quarter of 2019, and in combined cycle at full capacity by the fourth quarter of 2019.


To mitigate the impact of the reduced capacity in the local energy market, the Company installed 120 MW of rental power (gas turbines) until the combined cycle facility is at full load. The rental units were fully operational beginning in December 2018.cash flows.
Considering the information available as of the filing date, Managementmanagement believes the carrying amountvalue of our long-lived assets in Andresat Maritza of $395approximately $959 million is recoverable as of December 31, 2018.2021.
Changuinola Tunnel LeakForeign Exchange Rates
Increased water levels were notedWe operate in a creek nearmultiple countries and as such are subject to volatility in exchange rates at varying degrees at the Changuinola power plant, a 223 MW hydroelectric power facility in Panama. Aftersubsidiary level and between our functional currency, the completion of an assessment, the Company has confirmed loss of water in specific sectionsUSD, and currencies of the tunnel. The plant iscountries in operation and can generate up to its maximum capacity. Repairs will be needed to ensurewhich we operate. In 2019 there was a significant devaluation in the long term performanceArgentine peso against the USD, which had an impact on our 2019 results. Continued material devaluation of the facility, during which timeArgentine peso against the affected units of the plant will be out of service. Subject to final inspection, the repairs may take up to 10 months to complete and are expected to commence during the first quarter of 2019.USD could have an impact on our future results. The Company has notified its insurers of a potential claim and has asserted claims against its construction contractor. However, there can be no assurance of collection. The CompanyArgentine economy continues to monitorbe considered highly inflationary under U.S. GAAP; as such, all of our Argentine businesses are reported using the situationUSD as the functional currency. For additional information, refer to identify any potential changes to the tunnel. The Company has not identified any indicators of impairmentItem 7A.—Quantitative and believes the carrying value of the long-lived asset group of $931 million is recoverable as of December 31, 2018.Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Impairments
Long-lived Assets and Equity Affiliates During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, the Company recognized asset and other-than-temporary impairment expense of $355 million.$1.6 billion. See Note 7—22—Investments In and Advances To Affiliates and Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information. After recognizing thisthese impairment expense,expenses, the carrying value of the equity affiliates and the asset groups, includingour long-lived assets and those asset groups that were assessed and not impaired,for impairment in 2021 totaled $661$243 million at December 31, 2018.2021.
Events or changes in circumstances that may necessitate recoverability tests and potential impairments of long-lived assets may include, but are not limited to, adverse changes in the regulatory environment, unfavorable changes in power prices or fuel costs, increased competition due to additional capacity in the grid, technological advancements, declining trends in demand, evolving industry expectations to transition away from fossil fuel sources for generation, or an expectation it is more likely than not the asset will be disposed of before the end of its estimated useful life.
Goodwill The Company considers acurrently has no reporting units considered to be "at risk". A reporting unit at risk of impairmentis considered "at risk" when its fair value does not exceed its carrying amount by more than 10%. During the annual goodwill impairment test performed as of October 1, 2018, the Company determined that the fair value of its Gener reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 7%. Therefore, Gener's $868 million goodwill balance was considered to be "at risk" as of December 31, 2018, largely due to the fact that a market participant would no longer assume perpetual cash flows from coal-fired power plants due to the increased penetration of renewable energy in Chile.
Through 2028, Gener’s plants remain largely contracted, with most of its PPAs expiring between 2029 and 2037. The Company utilized the income approach in deriving the fair value of the Gener reporting unit, which included estimated cash flows assuming a 20-year annuity for thermal generation and longer term cash flows for hydro generation. These cash flows were discounted using a weighted average cost of capital of 7%, which was determined based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model. See Item 7.—Critical Accounting Policies and EstimatesFair Value of Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities and Note 8—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
The Company monitors its reporting units at risk of Step 1 failure on an ongoing basis,impairment for interim impairment indicators, and believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the calculations are reasonable.reasonable as of December 31, 2021. Should the fair value of any of the Company’s reporting units fall below its carrying amount because of reduced operating performance, market declines, changes in the discount rate, regulatory changes, or other adverse conditions, goodwill impairment charges may be necessary in future periods.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Overview
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $1.2 billion,$943 million, of which $24$41 million was held at the Parent Company and qualified holding companies. The Company also had $313$232 million in short termshort-term investments, held primarily at subsidiaries. In addition, we hadsubsidiaries, and restricted cash and debt service reserves of $837$541 million. The Company also had non-recourse and recourse aggregate principal amounts of debt outstanding of $15.6$14.8 billion and $3.7$3.8 billion, respectively. Of the approximately $1.7$1.4 billion of our current non-recourse debt, $825 million$1.1 billion was presented as such because it is due in the next twelve months $351


and $237 million relates to debt considered in default due to covenant violations, and $483 million relates to debt at Colon which is in compliance with its covenants, but is presented as current since it is probable that the Company cannot meet a technical covenant requirement by its deadline.violations. None of the defaults are payment defaults but are instead technical defaults triggered by failure to comply with other covenants and/or other conditions such as (but not limited to) failure to meet information covenants, complete construction or other milestones in an allocated time, meet certain minimum or maximum financial ratios, or other requirements contained in the non-recourse debt documents, of which $230 million is due to the Company. The Company expects to modifybankruptcy of the Colon loan agreement in 2019 to amend the requirements of this technical covenant, after which the debt will be re-classified as noncurrent.offtaker.
We expect such current maturities willof non-recourse debt to be repaid from net cash provided by operating activities of the subsidiary to which the debt relates, through opportunistic refinancing activity, or some combination thereof. We have $5$25 million of recourse debt which matures within the next twelve months. From time to time, we may elect to repurchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise when management believes that such securities are attractively priced. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, and other factors. The amounts involved in any such repurchases may be material.


105 | 2021 Annual Report

We rely mainly on long-term debt obligations to fund our construction activities. We have, to the extent available at acceptable terms, utilized non-recourse debt to fund a significant portion of the capital expenditures and investments required to construct and acquire our electric power plants, distribution companies, and related assets. Our non-recourse financing is designed to limit cross defaultcross-default risk to the Parent Company or other subsidiaries and affiliates. Our non-recourse long-term debt is a combination of fixed and variable interest rate instruments. Generally, a portion or all of the variable rate debt is fixed through the use of interest rate swaps. In addition, the debtDebt is typically denominated in the currency that matches the currency of the revenue expected to be generated from the benefiting project, thereby reducing currency risk. In certain cases, the currency is matched through the use of derivative instruments. The majority of our non-recourse debt is funded by international commercial banks, with debt capacity supplemented by multilaterals export credit agencies and local regional banks.
Given our long-term debt obligations, the Company is subject to interest rate risk on debt balances that accrue interest at variable rates. When possible, the Company will borrow funds at fixed interest rates or hedge its variable rate debt to fix its interest costs on such obligations. In addition, the Company has historically tried to maintain at least 70% of its consolidated long-term obligations at fixed interest rates, including fixing the interest rate through the use of interest rate swaps. These efforts apply to the notional amount of the swaps compared to the amount of related underlying debt. Presently, the Parent Company's only material unhedged exposure to variable interest rate debt relates to indebtednessdrawings of $365 million under its $366 million outstanding secured term loan due 2022.revolving credit facility. On a consolidated basis, of the Company's $19.7$18.8 billion of total gross debt outstanding as of December 31, 2018,2021, approximately $3.2$2.4 billion bore interest at variable rates that were not subject to a derivative instrument which fixed the interest rate. Brazil holds $1.1 billion of our floating rate non-recourse exposure as we have no ability to fix local debt interest rates efficiently.variable rate instruments act as a natural hedge against inflation in Brazil.
In addition to utilizing non-recourse debt at a subsidiary level when available, the Parent Company provides a portion, or in certain instances all, of the remaining long-term financing or credit required to fund development, construction or acquisition of a particular project. These investments have generally taken the form of equity investments or intercompany loans, which are subordinated to the project's non-recourse loans. We generally obtain the funds for these investments from our cash flows from operations, proceeds from the sales of assets and/or the proceeds from our issuances of debt, common stock and other securities. Similarly, in certain of our businesses, the Parent Company may provide financial guarantees or other credit support for the benefit of counterparties who have entered into contracts for the purchase or sale of electricity, equipment, or other services with our subsidiaries or lenders. In such circumstances, if a business defaults on its payment or supply obligation, the Parent Company will be responsible for the business' obligations up to the amount provided for in the relevant guarantee or other credit support. AtAs of December 31, 2018,2021, the Parent Company had provided outstanding financial and performance-related guarantees or other credit support commitments to or for the benefit of our businesses, which were limited by the terms of the agreements, of approximately $712 million$2.2 billion in aggregate (excluding those collateralized by letters of credit and other obligations discussed below).
As a result of the Parent Company's below investment gradesplit rating, some counterparties may be unwilling to accept our general unsecured commitments to provide credit support. Accordingly, with respect to both new and existing commitments, the Parent Company may be required to provide some other form of assurance, such as a letter of credit, to backstop or replace our credit support. The Parent Company may not be able to provide adequate assurances to such counterparties. To the extent we are required and able to provide letters of credit or other collateral to such counterparties, this will reduce the amount of credit available to us to meet our other liquidity


needs. AtAs of December 31, 2018,2021, we had $78 million in letters of credit outstanding, provided under our senior secured credit facility, $368$119 million in letters of credit outstanding provided under our unsecured seniorcredit facilities, and $48 million in letters of credit outstanding provided under our revolving credit facility. These letters of credit operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and business operations. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, the Company paid letter of credit fees ranging from 1% to 3% per annum on the outstanding amounts.
We expect to continue to seek, where possible, non-recourse debt financing in connection with the assets or businesses that we or our affiliates may develop, construct or acquire. However, depending on local and global market conditions and the unique characteristics of individual businesses, non-recourse debt may not be available on economically attractive terms or at all. If we decide not to provide any additional funding or credit support to a subsidiary project that is under construction or has near-term debt payment obligations and that subsidiary is unable to obtain additional non-recourse debt, such subsidiary may become insolvent, and we may lose our investment in that subsidiary. Additionally, if any of our subsidiaries lose a significant customer, the subsidiary may need to withdraw from a project or restructure the non-recourse debt financing. If we or the subsidiary choose not to proceed with a project or are unable to successfully complete a restructuring of the non-recourse debt, we may lose our investment in that subsidiary.


106 | 2021 Annual Report

Many of our subsidiaries depend on timely and continued access to capital markets to manage their liquidity needs. The inability to raise capital on favorable terms, to refinance existing indebtedness or to fund operations and other commitments during times of political or economic uncertainty may have material adverse effects on the financial condition and results of operations of those subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the timing of tariff increases or delays in the regulatory determinations under the relevant concessions could affect the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses.
Long-Term Receivables
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had approximately $116$58 million of gross accounts receivable classified as Other noncurrent assets primarily related to certain of its generation businesses in Argentina.. These noncurrent receivables mostly consist of accounts receivable in Argentina and Chile that, pursuant to amended agreements or government resolutions, have collection periods that extend beyond December 31, 2019,2022, or one year from the latest balance sheet date. The majority of ArgentinianArgentine receivables have been converted into long-term financing for the construction of power plants. Noncurrent receivables in Chile pertain primarily to revenues recognized on regulated energy contracts that were impacted by the Stabilization Fund created by the Chilean government. A portion relates to the extension of existing PPAs with the addition of renewable energy. See Note 6—7—Financing Receivables included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 1.—Business—South America SBU—Argentina—Regulatory Framework and Market Structure, and Item 1.7.Business—Regulatory Matters—ArgentinaManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Key Trends and Uncertainties—Macroeconomic and Political—Chile of this Form 10-K for further information.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had approximately $1.4$1.2 billion of loans receivable primarily related to the Mong Duong IIa facility constructed under a build, operate, and transferBOT contract in Vietnam. This loan receivable represents contract consideration related to the construction of the facility, which was substantially completed in 2015, and will be collected over the 25 year25-year term of the plant's PPA. In December 2020, Mong Duong met the held-for-sale criteria and the loan receivable balance, net of CECL reserve, was reclassified to held-for-sale assets. As of December 31, 2021, $91 million of the loan receivable balance was classified as Current held-for-sale assets and $1.1 billion was classified as Noncurrent held-for-sale assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 18—20—Revenue included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for further information.
Cash Sources and Uses
The primary sources of cash for the Company in the year ended December 31, 20182021 were debt financings, cash flows from operating activities, proceeds from the issuance of Equity Units, and sales of business interests, and debt financings.short-term investments. The primary uses of cash in the year ended December 31, 20182021 were repayments of debt, capital expenditures, acquisitions of business interests, and purchases of short-term investments.
The primary sources of cash for the Company in the year ended December 31, 2020 were debt financings, cash flows from operating activities, sales of short-term investments, and sales to noncontrolling interests. The primary uses of cash in the year ended December 31, 2020 were repayments of debt, capital expenditures, and purchases of short-term investments.
The primary sources of cash for the Company in the year ended December 31, 20172019 were debt financings, cash flows from operating activities, debt financings, and sales of short-term investments. The primary uses of cash in the year ended December 31, 20172019 were repayments of debt, capital expenditures, and purchases of short-term investments, and capital expenditures.investments.
The primary sources of cash for the Company in the year ended December 31, 2016 were cash flows from operating activities, debt financings, and sales of short-term investments. The primary uses of cash in the year ended December 31, 2016 were repayments of debt, purchases of short-term investments, and capital expenditures.


107 | 2021 Annual Report



A summary of cash-based activities are as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,
Cash Sources:202120202019
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities$2,802 $2,420 $2,026 
Net cash provided by operating activities1,902 2,755 2,466 
Issuance of non-recourse debt1,644 4,680 5,828 
Issuance of preferred stock1,014 — — 
Sale of short-term investments616 627 666 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests365 17 
Affiliate repayments and returns of capital320 158 131 
Sales to noncontrolling interests173 553 128 
Issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries153 112 — 
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash sold95 169 178 
Issuance of recourse debt3,419 — 
Other55 — 132 
Total Cash Sources$9,146 $14,894 $11,572 
Cash Uses:
Repayments under the revolving credit facilities$(2,420)$(2,479)$(1,735)
Capital expenditures(2,116)(1,900)(2,405)
Repayments of non-recourse debt(2,012)(4,136)(4,831)
Acquisitions of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash acquired(658)(136)(192)
Purchase of short-term investments(519)(653)(770)
Contributions and loans to equity affiliates(427)(332)(324)
Dividends paid on AES common stock(401)(381)(362)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(284)(422)(427)
Purchase of emissions allowances(265)(188)(137)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests(117)(259)— 
Payments for financing fees(32)(107)(126)
Repayments of recourse debt(26)(3,366)(450)
Payments for financed capital expenditures(24)(60)(146)
Other(188)(220)(98)
Total Cash Uses$(9,489)$(14,639)$(12,003)
Net increase (decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash$(343)$255 $(431)
 Year Ended December 31,
Cash Sources:2018 2017 2016
Net income, adjusted for non-cash items (1)
$2,529
 $2,569
 $2,344
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash sold2,020
 108
 538
Issuance of non-recourse debt1,928
 3,222
 2,978
Borrowings under revolving credit facilities1,865
 2,156
 1,465
Sale of short-term investments1,302
 3,540
 4,904
Issuance of recourse debt1,000
 1,025
 500
Contributions from noncontrolling interests and redeemable security holders43
 73
 190
Release of working capital(2)

 
 553
Other175
 102
 171
Total Cash Sources$10,862
 $12,795
 $13,643
      
Cash Uses:     
Repayments under revolving credit facilities$(2,238) $(1,742) $(1,433)
Capital expenditures(2,121) (2,177) (2,345)
Repayments of recourse debt(1,933) (1,353) (808)
Purchase of short-term investments(1,411) (3,310) (5,151)
Repayments of non-recourse debt(1,411) (2,360) (2,666)
Dividends paid on AES common stock(344) (317) (290)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(340) (424) (476)
Payments for financed capital expenditures(275) (179) (113)
Increase in working capital(2)
(186) (65) 
Contributions to equity affiliates(145) (89) (6)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired, and equity method investments(66) (609) (52)
Payments for financing fees(39) (100) (105)
Other(138) (242) (189)
Total Cash Uses$(10,647) $(12,967) $(13,634)
Net increase (decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash$215
 $(172) $9
_____________________________
(1)
Refer to the table within the Operating Activities section below for a reconciliation of non-cash items affecting net income during the applicable period.
(2)
Refer to the table within the Operating Activities section below for explanations of the variance in working capital requirements.
Consolidated Cash Flows
The following table reflects the changes in operating, investing, and financing cash flows for the comparative twelve month periods (in millions):
December 31,$ Change
Cash flows provided by (used in):2021202020192021 vs. 20202020 vs. 2019
Operating activities$1,902 $2,755 $2,466 $(853)$289 
Investing activities(3,051)(2,295)(2,721)(756)426 
Financing activities797 (78)(86)875 

  December 31, $ Change
Cash flows provided by (used in): 2018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
Operating activities $2,343
 $2,504
 $2,897
 $(161) $(393)
Investing activities (505) (2,599) (2,136) 2,094
 (463)
Financing activities (1,643) 43
 (747) (1,686) 790

108 | 2021 Annual Report

Operating Activities
The following table summarizes the key components of our consolidated operating cash flows (in millions):
  December 31, $ Change
  2018 2017 2016 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
Net income (loss) $1,565
 $(777) $(777) $2,342
 $
Depreciation and amortization 1,003
 1,169
 1,176
 (166) (7)
Loss (gain) on disposal and sale of business interests (984) 52
 (29) (1,036) 81
Impairment expenses 355
 537
 1,098
 (182) (561)
Loss on extinguishment of debt 188
 68
 20
 120
 48
Deferred income taxes 313
 672
 (793) (359) 1,465
Net loss (gain) from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses (269) 611
 1,383
 (880) (772)
Other adjustments to net income 358
 237
 266
 121
 (29)
Non-cash adjustments to net income (loss) 964
 3,346
 3,121
 (2,382) 225
Net income, adjusted for non-cash items $2,529
 $2,569
 $2,344
 $(40) $225
Changes in working capital (1)
 (186) (65) 553
 (121) (618)
Net cash provided by operating activities (2)
 $2,343
 $2,504
 $2,897
 $(161) $(393)
_____________________________
(1)
Refer to the table below for explanations of the variance in operating assets and liabilities.
(2)
Amounts included in the table above include the results of discontinued operations, where applicable.


Fiscal Year 20182021 versus 20172020
CashNet cash provided by operating activities decreased $161$853 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, compared to December 31, 2017,2020.
Operating Cash Flows (1)
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g22.jpg
(1)Amounts included in the chart above include the results of discontinued operations, where applicable.
(2)The change in adjusted net income is defined as the variance in net income, net of the total adjustments to net income as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.
(3)The change in working capital is defined as the variance in total changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.
Adjusted net income increased $799 million, primarily driven bydue to higher margins at our US and Utilities SBU, a decrease in netcurrent income adjusted for non-cash itemstax expense at Angamos due to a timing difference in recognition of $40 million,the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence, and a $121 million increasedecrease in working capital requirements.interest expense, partially offset by lower margins at our South America SBU.
The increase in workingWorking capital requirements of $121increased $1.7 billion, primarily due to a decrease in deferred income at Angamos due to revenue recognized from early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence in 2020, and a decrease in income tax liabilities.
Fiscal Year 2020 versus 2019
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $289 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, compared to December 31, 2017, was2019.
Operating Cash Flows (1)
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g23.jpg
(1)Amounts included in the chart above include the results of discontinued operations, where applicable.
(2)The change in adjusted net income is defined as the variance in net income, net of the total adjustments to net income as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.
(3)The change in working capital is defined as the variance in total changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.


109 | 2021 Annual Report

Adjusted net income decreased $40 million, primarily drivendue to lower margins at our US and Utilities SBU and prior year gains on insurance proceeds associated with the lightning incident at the Andres facility in 2018 and the Changuinola tunnel leak, partially offset by (in millions):higher margins at our South America and MCAC SBUs.
Working capital requirements decreased $329 million, primarily due to an increase in deferred income at Angamos as a result of the early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence.
Decreases in operating cash flow resulting from changes in: 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, primarily due to an insurance recovery receivable at Andres, advance payments to gas suppliers at Colon, and prior year collections of net regulatory assets at Eletropaulo, which was deconsolidated in Q4 2017; partially offset by the impact of the sales of Miami Fort and Zimmer and the retirement of the Stuart facility at DPL$(129)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities, primarily due to the deconsolidation of Eletropaulo in Q4 2017 and the timing of payments on coal purchases at Gener; partially offset by the timing of payments on coal purchases at Puerto Rico(101)
Other liabilities, primarily due to the deconsolidation of Eletropaulo in Q4 2017; partially offset by a prior year decrease in deferred tax and derivative liabilities at the Parent Company(57)
Accounts receivable, primarily due to lower collections at Los Mina and Itabo, and higher sales at Colon and Chivor; partially offset by the deconsolidation of Eletropaulo in Q4 2017 and higher CAMMESA collections at Alicura(29)
Increases in operating cash flow resulting from changes in: 
Other assets, primarily related to the deconsolidation of Eletropaulo in Q4 2017 and collections on the construction performance obligation from the offtaker at Vietnam263
Other(68)
Total decrease in operating cash flow from higher working capital requirements$(121)
Investing Activities
Fiscal Year 20172021 versus 20162020
Cash provided by operatingNet cash used in investing activities decreased $393increased $756 million for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021 compared to December 31, 2016,2020.
Investing Cash Flows
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g24.jpg
Acquisitions of business interests increased $522 million, primarily due to the AES Clean Energy acquisitions of New York Wind and Community Energy and the acquisitions of wind complexes at AES Brasil, partially offset by the prior year AES Panama acquisition of Penonome I.
Contributions and loans to equity affiliates increased $95 million, primarily due to higher contributions to Fluence and Uplight, our equity method investments, partially offset by higher prior year contributions to sPower and to Gas Natural Atlántico II, which was previously recorded as an equity investment in Panama in the prior year and is now consolidated by AES.
Repayments from equity affiliates increased $162 million, primarily due to an increase in loan repayments from sPower and Fluence, our equity method investments.
Cash from short-term investing activities increased $123 million, primarily at AES Brasil as a result of lower net short-term investment purchases in 2021.
Capital expenditures increased $216 million, discussed further below.


110 | 2021 Annual Report

Capital Expenditures
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g25.jpg
Growth expenditures increased $190 million, primarily driven by an increasehigher TDSIC investments at AES Ohio and AES Indiana, and renewable projects at AES Clean Energy, AES Brasil, and AES Andes. This impact was partially offset by the completion of renewable energy projects in net income, adjusted for non-cash itemsArgentina and the completion of $225the Southland repowering project.
Maintenance expenditures increased $33 million, primarily due to increased expenditures at AES Andes, DPL, El Salvador, and Mexico, partially offset by prior year expenditures at Andres as a $618result of the steam turbine lightning damage, and by decreased expenditures at AES Indiana and Itabo, due to its sale in the current year.
Environmental expenditures decreased $7 million, increaseprimarily due to the timing of payments in working capital requirements.
The increase in working capital requirements of $618 million for the prior year ended December 31, 2017, comparedrelated to December 31, 2016, was primarily driven by (in millions):
Decreases in operating cash flow resulting from changes in: 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, primarily short-term regulatory assets at Eletropaulo and Sul$(763)
Accounts receivable, primarily at Maritza and Eletropaulo(414)
Other liabilities, primarily due to higher deferrals into regulatory liabilities related to energy costs in 2016 compared to 2017 at Eletropaulo(361)
Increases in operating cash flow resulting from changes in: 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities, primarily at Eletropaulo, Tietê, Gener and Maritza; partially offset at the Parent Company782
Income taxes payable, net, and other taxes payable, primarily at Gener, Tietê and Eletropaulo252
Other(114)
Total decrease in operating cash flow from higher working capital requirements$(618)
Investing Activitiesprojects at AES Indiana.
Fiscal Year 20182020 versus 20172019
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $2,094$426 million for the year ended December 31, 20182020 compared to December 31, 2017, which was2019.
Investing Cash Flows
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g26.jpg
(1)Insurance proceeds are included within "Other investing" within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K.
Cash from short-term investing activities increased $78 million, primarily at Tietê as a result of lower net short-term investment purchases in 2020.
Insurance proceeds decreased $141 million, largely due to prior year insurance proceeds associated with the lightning incident at the Andres facility in 2018 and the Changuinola tunnel leak.
Capital expenditures decreased $505 million, discussed further below.


111 | 2021 Annual Report

Capital Expenditures
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g27.jpg
Growth expenditures decreased $356 million, primarily driven by (in millions):
Increases in: 
Proceeds from the sales of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash sold, primarily due to the current year sales of Masinloc, Electrica Santiago, Eletropaulo, CTNG and the DPL Peaker assets, partially offset by the sale of the Kazakhstan CHPs in 2017 and transaction costs incurred for the Beckjord sale$1,912
Decreases in: 
Payments for the acquisitions of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash acquired, primarily due to the acquisitions of sPower and Alto Sertão II in 2017543
Capital expenditures (1)
56
Cash resulting from net purchases of short-term investments(339)
Other investing activities(78)
Total decrease in net cash used in investing activities$2,094
_____________________________
(1)
Refer to the tables below for a breakout of capital expenditure by type and by primary business driver.


The following table summarizes the Company's capital expenditures for growth investments, maintenance, and environmental reported in investing cash activitiestiming of payments for the periods indicated (in millions):Southland repowering project, renewable energy projects in Argentina, and a pipeline project at Andres, as well as the completion of solar projects at AES Brasil, a wind project at AES Hawaii, and the Colon LNG facility in Panama. This impact was partially offset by higher investments at IPALCO and in renewable projects in Chile.
  December 31,
  2018 2017 $ Change
Growth Investments $1,663
 $1,549
 $114
Maintenance 423
 552
 (129)
Environmental 35
 76
 (41)
Total capital expenditures $2,121
 $2,177
 $(56)

Cash used for capitalMaintenance expenditures decreased $56$143 million, primarily due to prior year expenditures at Andres as a result of the steam turbine lightning damage and in Panama as a result of the Changuinola tunnel lining upgrade, as well as due to the timing of payments in the prior year at IPALCO.
Environmental expenditures decreased $6 million, primarily due to the timing of payments in the prior year related to projects in Chile.
Financing Activities
Fiscal Year 2021 versus 2020
Net cash provided by financing activities increased $875 million for the year ended December 31, 20182021 compared to December 31, 2017, which was2020.
Financing Cash Flows
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g28.jpg
See Notes 11—Debtand 17—Equityin Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for more information regarding significant debt and equity transactions, respectively.
The $1 billion impact from issuance of preferred stock is due to the issuance of Equity Units at the Parent Company.
The $405 million impact from Parent Company revolver transactions is primarily due to higher net borrowings in the current year.


112 | 2021 Annual Report

The $364 million impact from contributions from noncontrolling interests is primarily due to contributions from minority interests at AES Clean Energy, IPALCO, and AES Andes, due to the preemptive rights offering to fund its renewable growth program.
The $142 million impact from acquisitions of noncontrolling interests is due to the prior year acquisition of an additional 19.8% ownership interest in AES Brasil, partially offset by the first installment for the acquisition of the remaining 49.9% minority ownership interest in Colon.
The $912 million impact from non-recourse debt transactions is primarily due to lower net borrowings at Panama, Southland Energy, Vietnam, and Argentina, and higher net repayments at AES Brasil, partially offset by higher net borrowings at AES Clean Energy and lower net repayments in Chile.
The $380 million impact from sales to noncontrolling interests is primarily due to prior year proceeds received from the sale of a 35% ownership interest in Southland Energy.
The $242 million impact from other financing activities is primarily driven by (in millions):a decrease in distributions to noncontrolling interests, due to lower distributions to minority interests at AES Andes, AES Brasil, and Itabo, due to its sale in April 2021.
Decreases in: 
Growth expenditures at the MCAC SBU, primarily related to the completion of the Colon project, and lower spending at Los Mina due to the completion of the Combined Cycle project$(242)
Maintenance and environmental expenditures at the South America SBU, primarily due to the deconsolidation of Eletropaulo in Q4 2017(183)
Increases in:

Growth expenditures at the US and Utilities SBU, primarily due to increased spending for the Southland re-powering project373
Other capital expenditures(4)
Total decrease in capital expenditures$(56)
Fiscal Year 20172020 versus 20162019
Net cash used in investingfinancing activities increased $463decreased $8 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020 compared to December 31, 2016, which was2019.
Financing Cash Flows
(in millions)
aes-20211231_g29.jpg
See Notes 11—Debtand 17—Equityin Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for more information regarding significant debt and equity transactions, respectively.
The $503 million impact from recourse debt transactions is primarily drivendue to higher net borrowings at the Parent Company.
The $425 million impact from sales to noncontrolling interests is primarily due to the proceeds received from the sale of a 35% ownership interest in Southland Energy.
The $112 million impact from issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries is due to proceeds from the issuance of preferred shares to minority interests of Cochrane.
The $453 million impact from non-recourse debt transactions is primarily due to lower net borrowings at Southland and Chile, partially offset by (in millions):a decrease in net repayments at AES Brasil and DPL and higher net borrowings at AES Renewable Holdings, Panama, and Vietnam.
The $290 million impact from Parent Company revolver transactions is primarily due to higher net repayments in the current year.
The $259 million impact from acquisitions of noncontrolling interests is primarily due to the acquisition of an additional 19.8% ownership interest in AES Brasil.

Increases in: 
Payments for the acquisitions of businesses, net of cash and restricted cash acquired, and equity method investees (related to the acquisitions of sPower and Alto Sertão II in 2017, partially offset by reduced acquisitions of Distributed Energy projects in 2016)$(557)
Contributions to equity investments at OPGC and sPower(83)
Cash resulting from net sales of short-term investments477
Decreases in: 
Proceeds from the sale of business, net of cash and restricted cash sold, related to the sale of Sul in 2016, partially offset by the sale of Zimmer and Miami Fort(430)
Capital expenditures (1)
168
Other investing activities(38)
Total increase in net cash used in investing activities$(463)

_____________________________
(1)
Refer to the tables below for a breakout of capital expenditures by type and by primary business driver.113 | 2021 Annual Report
The following table summarizes the Company's capital expenditures for growth investments, maintenance and environmental for the periods indicated (in millions):

  December 31,
  2017 2016 $ Change
Growth Investments $1,549
 $1,510
 $39
Maintenance 552
 617
 (65)
Environmental (1)
 76
 218
 (142)
Total capital expenditures $2,177
 $2,345
 $(168)
_____________________________
(1)
Includes both recoverable and non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures.


Cash used for capital expenditures decreased by $168 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016, which was primarily driven by (in millions):
Decreases in: 
Growth expenditures at the South America SBU, primarily due to the completion of the Cochrane project and slower than anticipated productivity by construction contractors at Alto Maipo$(114)
Growth expenditures at the Eurasia SBU, primarily due to timing of payments resulting in more financed capex(73)
Maintenance and environmental expenditures at the US and Utilities SBU, primarily due to lower spending at IPALCO on the NPDES and MATS compliance and Harding Street refueling projects, decreased spending on CCR compliance, and decreased spending at DPL on Stuart and Killen facilities due to planned plant closures(180)
Increases in: 
Growth expenditures at the US and Utilities SBU, primarily due to increased spending for the Southland re-powering project and various Distributed Energy projects; partially offset by lower spending related to Eagle Valley at IPALCO233
Other capital expenditures(34)
Total decrease in capital expenditures$(168)
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities increased $1,686 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017, which was primarily driven by (in millions):
Increases in: 
Net repayments of recourse debt at the Parent Company (1)
$(605)
Net repayments of non-recourse debt at Angamos, DPL, Chivor, and Maritza(372)
Net repayments on revolving credit facilities at IPALCO and Gener(370)
Net issuance of non-recourse debt at Southland199
Decreases in: 
Net issuance of non-recourse debt at AES Argentina, Tietê, Colon, Alto Maipo, US Generation, and Los Mina(614)
Net borrowing on revolving credit facilities at the Parent Company(413)
Net repayments of non-recourse debt at IPALCO and Gener518
Other financing activities(29)
Total increase in net cash used in financing activities$(1,686)
_____________________________
(1)
See Note 10—Debtin Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for more information regarding significant recourse debt transactions.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased $790 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016, which was primarily driven by (in millions):
Increases in: 
Net issuance of non-recourse debt at Southland, Tiete, Eletropaulo, AES Argentina, and Colon$1,396
Net repayments of non-recourse debt at Gener and IPALCO(628)
Net borrowing on revolving credit facilities at the Parent Company and Gener297
Decreases in: 
Net repayments on revolving credit facilities at IPALCO123
Net issuance of non-recourse debt at Cochrane(170)
Proceeds from the sale of redeemable stock of subsidiaries at IPALCO(134)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests and redeemable security holders at Colon, IPALCO, and Distributed Energy(117)
Other financing activities23
Total Increase in net cash provided by financing activities$790
Parent Company Liquidity
The following discussion of Parent Company Liquidity is included as a useful measure of the liquidity available to The AES Corporation, or the Parent Company, given the non-recourse nature of most of our indebtedness. Parent Company Liquidity as outlined below is a non-GAAP measure and should not be construed as an alternative to cashCash and cash equivalents, which is determined in accordance with GAAP. Parent Company Liquidity may differ from similarly titled measures used by other companies. The principal sources of liquidity at the Parent Company level are dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries, including refinancing proceeds, proceeds from debt and equity financings at the Parent Company level, including availability under our revolving credit facilities,facility, and proceeds from asset sales. Cash requirements at the Parent Company level are primarily to fund interest;interest and principal repayments of debt;debt, construction commitments;commitments, other equity commitments;commitments, common stock repurchases; acquisitions; taxes;repurchases, acquisitions, taxes, Parent Company overhead and development costs;costs, and dividends on common stock.
The Company defines Parent Company Liquidity as cash available to the Parent Company, including cash at qualified holding companies, plus available borrowings under our existing credit facilities plus cash at qualified holding companies.facility. The cash held at qualified holding companies represents cash sent to subsidiaries of the Company domiciled outside of the U.S. Such subsidiaries have no contractual restrictions on their ability to send cash to the Parent Company. Parent Company


Liquidity is reconciled to its most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, Cash and cash equivalents, at December 31, 2018 and 2017the periods indicated as follows:follows (in millions):
Parent Company Liquidity (in millions)
 2018 2017
Consolidated cash and cash equivalents $1,166
 $949
Less: Cash and cash equivalents at subsidiaries (1,142) (938)
Parent and qualified holding companies' cash and cash equivalents 24
 11
Commitments under Parent Company credit facilities 1,100
 1,100
Less: Letters of credit under the credit facilities (78) (35)
Less: Borrowings under the credit facilities 
 (207)
Borrowings available under Parent Company credit facilities 1,022
 858
Total Parent Company Liquidity $1,046
 $869
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Consolidated cash and cash equivalents$943 $1,089 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents at subsidiaries(902)(1,018)
Parent Company and qualified holding companies' cash and cash equivalents41 71 
Commitments under the Parent Company credit facility1,250 1,000 
Less: Letters of credit under the credit facility(48)(77)
Less: Borrowings under the credit facility(365)(70)
Borrowings available under the Parent Company credit facility837 853 
Total Parent Company Liquidity$878 $924 
The Parent Company paid dividends of $0.52$0.60 per outstanding share to its common stockholders during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. While we intend to continue payment of dividends and believe we will have sufficient liquidity to do so, we can provide no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends, or if continued, the amount of such dividends.
Recourse Debt
Our total recourse debt was $3.7$3.8 billion and $4.6$3.4 billion at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. See Note 10—11—Debt in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional detail.
While weWe believe that our sources of liquidity will be adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future, thisfuture. This belief is based on a number of material assumptions, including, without limitation, assumptions about our ability to access the capital markets, the operating and financial performance of our subsidiaries, currency exchange rates, power market pool prices, and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends. In addition, our subsidiaries' ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us (at the Parent Company level) is subject to certain limitations contained in loans, governmental provisions and other agreements. We can provide no assurance that these sources will be available when needed or that the actual cash requirements will not be greater than anticipated. We have met our interim needs for shorter-term and working capital financing at the Parent Company level with our revolving credit facility. See Item 1A.—Risk FactorsThe AES Corporation is a holding company and itsCorporation's ability to make payments on its outstanding indebtedness including its public debt securities, is dependent upon the receipt of funds from itsour subsidiaries, by way of dividends, fees, interest, loans or otherwise, of this Form 10-K.
Various debt instruments at the Parent Company level, including our senior securedrevolving credit facilities,facility, contain certain restrictive covenants. The covenants provide for, among other items, limitations on other indebtedness; liens, investments and guarantees; limitations on dividends, stock repurchases and other equity transactions;liens; restrictions and limitations on mergers and acquisitions salesand the disposition of assets, leases, transactions with affiliates and off-balance sheet and derivative arrangements;assets; maintenance of certain financial ratios; and financial and other reporting requirements. As of December 31, 2018,2021, we were in compliance with these covenants at the Parent Company level.
Non-Recourse Debt
While the lenders under our non-recourse debt financings generally do not have direct recourse to the Parent Company, defaults thereunder can still have important consequences for our results of operations and liquidity, including, without limitation:


114 | 2021 Annual Report

reducing our cash flows as the subsidiary will typically be prohibited from distributing cash to the Parent Company during the time period of any default;
triggering our obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee, letter of credit or other credit support we have provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary;
causing us to record a loss in the event the lender forecloses on the assets; and
triggering defaults in our outstanding debt at the Parent Company.
For example, our senior securedrevolving credit facilitiesfacility and outstanding debt securities at the Parent Company include events of default for certain bankruptcy relatedbankruptcy-related events involving material subsidiaries. In addition, our revolving credit agreement at the Parent Company includes events of default related to payment defaults and accelerations of outstanding debt of material subsidiaries.
Some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness. The total non-recourse debt classified as current in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets amounts to $1.7$1.4 billion. AsThe portion of December 31, 2018, $351 million of non-recoursecurrent debt was current related to such defaults was $237 million at twoDecember 31, 2021, all of which was non-recourse debt related to three subsidiaries AES Puerto Rico, and AES Ilumina, and $483AES Jordan Solar. None of the defaults are payment defaults, but are instead technical defaults triggered by failure to comply with other covenants or other conditions contained in the non-recourse debt documents, of which $230 million relatesis due to debt at Colon which is in


compliance with its covenants, but is presented as current since it is probable that the Company cannot meet a technical covenant requirement by its deadline. The Company expects to modifybankruptcy of the Colon loan agreement in 2019 to amend the requirements of this technical covenant, after which the debt will be re-classified as noncurrent.offtaker. See Note 10—11—Debt in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional detail.
None of the subsidiaries that are currently in default are subsidiaries that met the applicable definition of materiality under AES' corporatethe Parent Company's debt agreements as of December 31, 20182021, in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under AES'the Parent Company's indebtedness. However, as a result of additional dispositions of assets, other significant reductions in asset carrying values or other matters in the future that may impact our financial position and results of operations or the financial position of the individual subsidiary, it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries could fall within the definition of a "material subsidiary" and thereby upon an acceleration, trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under the Parent Company's outstanding debt securities. A material subsidiary is defined in the Parent Company's senior secured revolving credit facilitiesfacility as any business that contributed 20% or more of the Parent Company's total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters. As of December 31, 2018,2021, none of the defaults listed above, individually or in the aggregate, results in or is at risk of triggering a cross-default under the recourse debt of the Parent Company.
Contractual Obligations and Parent Company Contingent Contractual Obligations
A summary of our contractual obligations, commitments and other liabilities as of December 31, 20182021 is presented below (in millions):
Contractual ObligationsTotalLess than 1 year1-3 years3-5 yearsMore than 5 yearsOther
Footnote Reference(5)
Debt obligations (1) (2)
$18,815 $1,395 $2,252 $4,273 $10,895 $— 11 
Interest payments on long-term debt (3)
6,180 832 1,292 1,013 3,043 — n/a
Finance lease obligations (2)
277 16 13 240 — 14 
Operating lease obligations (2)
632 32 59 53 488 — 14 
Electricity obligations8,804 714 1,121 1,075 5,894 — 12 
Fuel obligations5,509 1,882 2,038 1,476 113 — 12 
Other purchase obligations8,831 5,896 939 411 1,585 — 12 
Other long-term liabilities reflected on AES' consolidated balance sheet under GAAP (2) (4)
823 — 556 17 241 n/a
Total$49,871 $10,759 $8,273 $8,331 $22,499 $
_____________________________
(1)Includes recourse and excludesnon-recourse debt presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These amounts exclude finance lease liabilities which are included in the finance lease category.
(2)Excludes any businesses classified as discontinued operations or held-for-sale (in millions):
Contractual ObligationsTotal Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years Other 
Footnote Reference(4)
Debt obligations (1)
$19,687

$1,701

$3,567

$4,407

$10,012
 $
 10
Interest payments on long-term debt (2)
6,967
 846
 1,625
 1,194
 3,302
 
 n/a
Capital lease obligations12
 1
 2
 2
 7
 
 11
Operating lease obligations643
 74
 63
 51
 455
 
 11
Electricity obligations7,573
 786
 973
 627
 5,187
 
 11
Fuel obligations6,175
 1,494
 1,909
 1,038
 1,734
 
 11
Other purchase obligations3,944
 1,375
 1,017
 774
 778
 
 11
Other long-term liabilities reflected on AES' consolidated balance sheet under GAAP (3)
809
 
 263
 207
 326
 13
 n/a
Total$45,810
 $6,277
 $9,419
 $8,300
 $21,801
 $13
  
_____________________________
(1)
Includes recourse and non-recourse debt presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These amounts exclude capital lease obligations which are included in the capital lease category.
(2)held-for-sale. See Note 24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions
Interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding at December 31, 2018 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing, early redemptions or new debt issuances. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 2018.
(3)
These amounts do not include current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet except for the current portion of uncertain tax obligations. Noncurrent uncertain tax obligations are reflected in the "Other" column of the table above as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the future payments. In addition, these amounts do not include: (1) regulatory liabilities (See Note 9—Regulatory Assets and Liabilities), (2) contingencies (See Note 12—Contingencies), (3) pension and other postretirement employee benefit liabilities (see Note 13—Benefit Plans), (4) derivatives and incentive compensation (See Note 5—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities) or (5) any taxes (See Note 21—Income Taxes) except for uncertain tax obligations, as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments. See the indicated notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the items excluded.
(4)
For further information see the note referenced below in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K for additional information related to held-for-sale businesses.
(3)Interest payments are estimated based on final maturity dates of debt securities outstanding at December 31, 2021 and do not reflect anticipated future refinancing, early redemptions or new debt issuances. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 2021.
(4)These amounts do not include current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet except for the current portion of uncertain tax obligations. Noncurrent uncertain tax obligations are reflected in the "Other" column of the table above as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the future payments. In addition, these amounts do not include: (1) regulatory liabilities (See Note 10—Regulatory Assets and Liabilities), (2) contingencies (See Note 13—Contingencies), (3) pension and other postretirement employee benefit liabilities (see Note 15—Benefit Plans), (4) derivatives and incentive compensation (See Note 6—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities) or (5) any taxes (See Note 23—Income Taxes) except for uncertain tax obligations, as the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments. See the indicated notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K for additional information on the items excluded.


115 | 2021 Annual Report

(5)For further information see the note referenced below in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.
The following table presents our Parent Company's contingent contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018:2021:
Contingent contractual obligations Amount (in millions) Number of Agreements Maximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement (in millions)Contingent contractual obligationsAmount (in millions)Number of AgreementsMaximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement (in millions)
Guarantees and commitments $685
 33 $0 — 157Guarantees and commitments$2,162 90$0 — 400
Letters of credit under the unsecured credit facility 368
 10 $1 — 247
Letters of credit under the senior secured credit facility 78
 23 $0 — 49
Asset sale related indemnities (1)
 27
 1 $27
Letters of credit under the unsecured credit facilitiesLetters of credit under the unsecured credit facilities119 31$0 — 42
Letters of credit under the revolving credit facilityLetters of credit under the revolving credit facility48 26$0 — 16
Surety bondSurety bond2$1
Total $1,158
 67 Total$2,331 149
_____________________________
(1)     Excludes normal and customary representations and warranties in agreements for the sale of assets (including ownership in associated legal entities) where the associated risk is considered to be nominal.
Excludes normal and customary representations and warranties in agreements for the sale of assets (including ownership in associated legal entities) where the associated risk is considered to be nominal.
We have a diverse portfolio of performance-related contingent contractual obligations. These obligations are designed to cover potential risks and only require payment if certain targets are not met or certain contingencies occur. The risks associated with these obligations include change of control, construction cost overruns, subsidiary default, political risk, tax indemnities, spot market power prices, sponsor support and liquidated damages under power sales agreements for projects in development, in operation and under construction. In addition, we have an


asset sale program through which we may have customary indemnity obligations under certain assets sale agreements. While we do not expect that we will be required to fund any material amounts under these contingent contractual obligations beyond 2018,2021, many of the events which would give rise to such obligations are beyond our control. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to fund our obligations under these contingent contractual obligations if we are required to make substantial payments thereunder.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Consolidated Financial Statements of AES are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. AES' significant accounting policies are described in Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 88.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.
An accounting estimate is considered critical if the estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the estimate was made, different estimates reasonably could have been used, or the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.
Management believes that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, actual results could materially differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to these balances in future periods. Management has discussed these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee, as appropriate. Listed below are the Company's most significant critical accounting estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes — We are subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Our worldwide income tax provision requires significant judgment and is based on calculations and assumptions that are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities. Certain of the Company's subsidiaries are under examination by relevant taxing authorities for various tax years. The Company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each tax jurisdiction when determining the adequacy of the provision for income taxes. Accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a more likely than not recognition threshold. Tax reserves have been established, which the Company believes to be adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments. Once established, reserves are adjusted only when there is more information available or when an event occurs necessitating a change to the reserves. While the Company believes that the amounts of the tax estimates are reasonable, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may be materially different than the reserve amounts.
Because we have a wide range of statutory tax rates in the multiple jurisdictions in which we operate, any changes in our geographical earnings mix could materially impact our effective tax rate. Furthermore, our tax position could be adversely impacted by changes in tax laws, tax treaties or tax regulations, or the interpretation or


116 | 2021 Annual Report

enforcement thereof and such changes may be more likely or become more likely in view of recent economic trends in certain of the jurisdictions in which we operate. As an example, new tax laws were enacted inDecember 2017 in the U.S. which decreased the statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21%, required a one-time transition tax, and introduced numerous other changes. As further outlined in Key Trends and Uncertainties, the Company anticipates that the GILTI provisions of U.S. tax reform could materially impact the effective tax rate in future periods. See Note 21—Income Taxesto the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
In accordance with SAB 118, the Company made reasonable estimates of the impacts of U.S. tax reform on its 2017 financial results, and recorded adjustments to those estimates in 2018 as analysis was completed. As of December 31, 2018, our analysis of the one-time impacts of the TCJA is complete under SAB 118. However, in the first quarter of 2019, the U.S. Treasury Department issued final regulations on the one-time transition tax. The final regulations include changes from the proposed regulations issued in 2018 and we expect to record the impacts of the final regulations in the first quarter of 2019. We are still evaluating the final regulations which may have a material impact on our financial statements.
In addition, no taxes have been recorded on undistributed earnings for certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to the extent such earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested in the operations of those subsidiaries. Should the earnings be remitted as dividends, the Company may be subject to additional foreign withholding and state income taxes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of the existing assets and liabilities, and their respective income


tax bases. The Company establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company has elected to treat GILTI as an expense in the period in which the tax is accrued. Accordingly, no deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded related to GILTI.
Sales of Noncontrolling Interests Impairments— Sales of noncontrolling interests are recognized within stockholders' equity. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU No. 2017-05, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets, which clarified the accounting for the sale of business interests as either the sale of nonfinancial assets or the sale of businesses. Among other things, under the newly adopted guidance fewer transactions are expected to meet the definition of a business under the scope of ASC 810 and will fall under the scope of the sale of nonfinancial assets.
Prior to January 1, 2018, the accounting for a sale of noncontrolling interests was dependent on whether the sale was considered a sale of in-substance real estate, where the gain (loss) on sale would be recognized in earnings rather than within stockholders' equity. In-substance real estate is composed of land plus improvements and integral equipment. The determination of whether property, plant and equipment is integral equipment is based on the significance of the costs to remove the equipment from its existing location (including the cost of repairing damage resulting from the removal), combined with the decrease in the fair value of the equipment as a result of those removal activities. When the combined total of removal costs and the decrease in fair value of the equipment exceeds 10% of the fair value of the equipment, the equipment is considered integral equipment. The accounting standards specifically identify power plants as an example of in-substance real estate. Where the consolidated entity in which noncontrolling interests have been sold contains in-substance real estate, management estimates the extent to which the total fair value of the assets of the entity is represented by the in-substance real estate and whether significant value exists beyond the in-substance real estate. This estimation considers all qualitative and quantitative factors relevant for each sale and, where appropriate, includes making quantitative estimates about the fair value of the entity and its identifiable assets and liabilities (including any favorable or unfavorable contracts) by analogy to the accounting standards on business combinations. As such, these estimates may require significant judgment and assumptions, similar to the critical accounting estimates discussed below for impairments and fair value.
Impairments — Our accounting policies on goodwill and long-lived assets are described in detail in Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company makes considerable judgments in its impairment evaluations of goodwill and long-lived assets, starting with determining if an impairment indicator exists. Events that may result in an impairment analysis being performed include, but are not limited to: adverse changes in the regulatory environment, unfavorable changes in power prices or fuel costs, increased competition due to additional capacity in the grid, technological advancements, declining trends in demand, evolving industry expectations to transition away from fossil fuel sources for generation, or an expectation it is more likely than not that the asset will be disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company exercises judgment in determining if these events represent an impairment indicator requiring the computation of the fair value of goodwill and/or the recoverability of long-lived assets. The fair value determination is typically the most judgmental part in an impairment evaluation. Please see Fair Value below for further detail.
As part of the impairment evaluation process, management analyzes the sensitivity of fair value to various underlying assumptions. The level of scrutiny increases as the gap between fair value and carrying amount decreases. Changes in any of these assumptions could result in management reaching a different conclusion regarding the potential impairment, which could be material. Our impairment evaluations inherently involve uncertainties from uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively impact the anticipated future economic and operating conditions.
Further discussion of the impairment charges recognized by the Company can be found within Note 8—9—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets andand Note 20—22—Asset Impairment Expense to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Fair ValueDepreciation— Depreciation, after consideration of salvage value and asset retirement obligations, is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are determined on a composite or component basis. The Company considers many factors in its estimate of useful lives, including expected usage, physical deterioration, technological changes, existence and length of off-taker agreements, and laws and regulations, among others. In certain circumstances, these estimates involve significant judgment and require management to forecast the impact of relevant factors over an extended time horizon.
Useful life estimates are continually evaluated for appropriateness as changes in the relevant factors arise, including when a long-lived asset group is tested for recoverability. Depreciation studies are performed periodically for assets subject to composite depreciation. Any change to useful lives is considered a change in accounting estimate and is made on a prospective basis.
Fair Value — For information regarding the fair value hierarchy, see Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — A significant number of the Company's financial instruments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings or other comprehensive income each period. Investments are generally fair valued based on quoted market prices or other observable market data such as interest rate indices. The Company's investments are primarily certificates of deposit and mutual funds. Derivatives are valued using observable data as inputs into internal valuation models. The Company's derivatives primarily consist of interest rate swaps, foreign currency instruments, and commodity and embedded derivatives. Additional



117 | 2021 Annual Report

discussion regarding the nature of these financial instruments and valuation techniques can be found in Note 4—5—Fair Value included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Fair Value of Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities — Significant estimates are made in determining the fair value of long-lived tangible and intangible assets (i.e., property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill) during the impairment evaluation process. In addition, the majority of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination and asset acquisitions by VIEs are required to be recognized at fair value under the relevant accounting guidance.
The Company may engage an independent valuation firm to assist management with the valuation. The Company generally utilizes the income approach to value nonfinancial assets and liabilities, specifically a Discounted Cash Flow ("DCF") model to estimate fair value by discounting cash flow forecasts, adjusted to reflect market participant assumptions, to the extent necessary, at an appropriate discount rate.
Management applies considerable judgment in selecting several input assumptions during the development of our cash flow forecasts. Examples of the input assumptions that our forecasts are sensitive to include macroeconomic factors such as growth rates, industry demand, inflation, exchange rates, power prices, and commodity prices. Whenever appropriate, management obtains these input assumptions from observable market data sources (e.g., Economic Intelligence Unit) and extrapolates the market information if an input assumption is not observable for the entire forecast period. Many of these input assumptions are dependent on other economic assumptions, which are often derived from statistical economic models with inherent limitations such as estimation differences. Further, several input assumptions are based on historical trends which often do not recur. It is not uncommon that different market data sources have different views of the macroeconomic factor expectations and related assumptions. As a result, macroeconomic factors and related assumptions are often available in a narrow range; however, in some situations these ranges become wide and the use of a different set of input assumptions could produce significantly different budgets and cash flow forecasts.
A considerable amount of judgment is also applied in the estimation of the discount rate used in the DCF model. To the extent practical, inputs to the discount rate are obtained from market data sources (e.g., Bloomberg). The Company selects and uses a set of publicly traded companies from the relevant industry to estimate the discount rate inputs. Management applies judgment in the selection of such companies based on its view of the most likely market participants. It is reasonably possible that the selection of a different set of likely market participants could produce different input assumptions and result in the use of a different discount rate.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — We enter into various derivative transactions in order to hedge our exposure to certain market risks. We primarily use derivative instruments to manage our interest rate, commodity, and foreign currency exposures. We do not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes. See Note 5—6—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information on the classification.
The fair value measurement standard requires the Company to consider and reflect the assumptions of market participants in the fair value calculation. These factors include nonperformance risk (the risk that the obligation will not be fulfilled) and credit risk, both of the reporting entity (for liabilities) and of the counterparty (for assets). Due to the nature of the Company's interest rate swaps, which are typically associated with non-recourse debt, creditCredit risk for AES is evaluated at the subsidiary level rather than atof the Parent Company level.entity that is party to the contract. Nonperformance risk on the Company's derivative instruments is an adjustment to the initial asset/liability fair value position that is derived from internally developed valuation models that utilize observable market inputs.inputs that may or may not be observable.
As a result of uncertainty, complexity, and judgment, accounting estimates related to derivative accounting could result in material changes to our financial statements under different conditions or utilizing different assumptions. As a part of accounting for these derivatives, we make estimates concerning nonperformance, volatilities, market liquidity, future commodity prices, interest rates, credit ratings, (both ours and our counterparty's), and future foreign exchange rates. Refer to Note 4—5—Fair Value included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional details.
The fair value of our derivative portfolio is generally determined using internal and third party valuation models, most of which are based on observable market inputs, including interest rate curves and forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities. The Company derives most of its financial instrument market assumptions from market efficient data sources (e.g., Bloomberg, Reuters and Platt's). In some cases, where market data is not readily available, management uses comparable market sources and empirical evidence to derive market assumptions to determine a financial instrument's fair value. In certain instances, the published curvepricing may not extend through the remaining term of the contract and management must make assumptions to extrapolate the curve.


118 | 2021 Annual Report

Specifically, where there is limited forward curve data with respect to foreign exchange contracts beyond the traded points, the Company utilizes the interest rate differential approach to construct the remaining portion of the


forward curve. Additionally, in the absence of quoted prices, we may rely on "indicative pricing" quotes from financial institutions to input into our valuation model for certain of our foreign currency swaps. These indicative pricing quotes do not constitute either a bid or ask price and therefore are not considered observable market data. For individual contracts, the use of different valuation models or assumptions could have a material effect on the calculated fair value.
Regulatory Assets — Management continually assesses whether the regulatory assets are probable of future recovery by considering factors such as applicable regulatory changes, recent rate orders applicable to other regulated entities, and the status of any pending or potential deregulation legislation. If future recovery of costs ceases to be probable, any asset write-offs would be required to be recognized in operating income.
Consolidation — The Company enters into transactions impacting the Company's equity interests in its affiliates. In connection with each transaction, the Company must determine whether the transaction impacts the Company's consolidation conclusion by first determining whether the transaction should be evaluated under the variable interest model or the voting model. In determining which consolidation model applies to the transaction, the Company is required to make judgments about how the entity operates, the most significant of which are whether (i) the entity has sufficient equity to finance its activities, (ii) the equity holders, as a group, have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, and (iii) whether the entity has non-substantive voting rights.
If the entity is determined to be a variable interest entity, the most significant judgment in determining whether the Company must consolidate the entity is whether the Company, including its related parties and de facto agents, collectively have power and benefits. If AES is determined to have power and benefits, the entity will be consolidated by AES.
Alternatively, if the entity is determined to be a voting model entity, the most significant judgments involve determining whether the non-AES shareholders have substantive participating rights. The assessment of shareholder rights and whether they are substantive participating rights requires significant judgment since the rights provided under shareholders' agreements may include selecting, terminating, and setting the compensation of management responsible for implementing the subsidiary's policies and procedures, and establishing operating and capital decisions of the entity, including budgets, in the ordinary course of business. On the other hand, if shareholder rights are only protective in nature (referred to as protective rights), then such rights would not overcome the presumption that the owner of a majority voting interest shall consolidate its investee. Significant judgment is required to determine whether minority rights represent substantive participating rights or protective rights that do not affect the evaluation of control. While both represent an approval or veto right, a distinguishing factor is the underlying activity or action to which the right relates.
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — The Company recognizes a net asset or liability reflecting the funded status of pension and other postretirement plans with current-year changes in actuarial gains or losses recognized in AOCL, except for those plans at certain of the Company's regulated utilities that can recover portions of their pension and postretirement obligations through future rates. The valuation of the Company's benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and net periodic benefit costs requires various estimates and assumptions, the most significant of which include the discount rate and expected return on plan assets. These assumptions are reviewed by the Company on an annual basis. Refer to Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Revenue Recognition — The Company recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of energy, capacity, and other services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled. In applying the revenue model, we determine whether the sale of energy, capacity, and other services represent a single performance obligation based on the individual market and terms of the contract. Generally, the promise to transfer energy and capacity represent a performance obligation that is satisfied over time and meets the criteria to be accounted for as a series of distinct goods or services. Progress toward satisfaction of a performance obligation is measured using output methods, such as MWhs delivered or MWs made available, and when we are entitled to consideration in an amount that corresponds directly to the value of our performance completed to date, we recognize revenue in the amount to which we have the right to invoice. For further information regarding the nature of our revenue streams and our critical accounting policies affecting revenue recognition, see Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
New Accounting PronouncementsLeases SeeThe Company recognizes operating and finance right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for most leases with an initial term of greater than 12 months. Lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the


119 | 2021 Annual Report

expected lease term. Our subsidiaries’ incremental borrowing rates are used in determining the present value of lease payments when the implicit rate is not readily determinable. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use asset may be required for items such as prepayments, lease incentives, or initial direct costs. For further information regarding the nature of our leases and our critical accounting policies affecting leases, see Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Credit Losses — The Company uses a forward-looking "expected loss" model to recognize allowances for credit losses on trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans, and other instruments. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, the Company continues to measure credit losses as it was done under previous GAAP, except that unrealized losses due to credit-related factors are now recognized as an allowance on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with a corresponding adjustment to earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For further information regarding credit losses, see Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
New Accounting Pronouncements
    See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Form 10-K for further information about new accounting pronouncements adopted during 20182021 and accounting pronouncements issued, but not yet effective.



ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Overview Regarding Market Risks
Our businesses are exposed to and proactively manage market risk. Our primary market risk exposure is to the price of commodities, particularly electricity, oil, natural gas, coal, and environmental credits. In addition, our businesses are also exposed to lower electricity prices due to increased competition, including from renewable sources such as wind and solar, as a result of lower costs of entry and lower variable costs. We operate in multiple countries and as such are subject to volatility in exchange rates at varying degrees at the subsidiary level and between our functional currency, the U.S. dollar,USD, and currencies of the countries in which we operate. We are also exposed to interest rate fluctuations due to our issuance of debt and related financial instruments.
The disclosures presented in this Item 7A are based upon a number of assumptions; actual effects may differ. The safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 shall apply to the disclosures contained in this Item 7A. For further information regarding market risk, see Item 1A.—Risk Factors, Our financial position and results of operations may fluctuate significantly due to fluctuationsFluctuations in currency exchange rates experienced atmay impact our foreign operationsfinancial results and position,; Wholesale power prices are decliningmay experience significant volatility in manyour markets and thiswhich could have a material adverse effect onimpact our operations and opportunities for future growth, agrowth;nd We may not be adequately hedged against our exposure to changes in commodity prices or interest ratesrates; and Certain of our businesses are sensitive to variations in weather and hydrology of this 20182021 Form 10-K.
Commodity Price Risk
Although we prefer to hedge our exposure to the impact of market fluctuations in the price of electricity, fuels, and environmental credits, some of our generation businesses operate under short-term sales or under contract sales that leave an unhedged exposure on some of our capacity or through imperfect fuel pass-throughs. In our utility businesses, we may be exposed to commodity price movements depending on our excess or shortfall of generation relative to load obligations and sharing or pass-through mechanisms. These businesses subject our operational results to the volatility of prices for electricity, fuels, and environmental credits in competitive markets. We employ risk management strategies to hedge our financial performance against the effects of fluctuations in energy commodity prices. The implementation of these strategies can involve the use of physical and financial commodity contracts, futures, swaps, and options.
The portion of our sales and purchases that are not subject to such agreements or contracted businesses where indexation is not perfectly matched to business drivers will be exposed to commodity price risk. When hedging the output of our generation assets, we utilize contract sales that lock in the spread per MWh between variable costs and the price at which the electricity can be sold.
AES businesses will see changes in variable margin performance as global commodity prices shift. For 2019,2022, we project pre-tax earnings exposure on a 10% (uncorrelated) move in commodity prices wouldto be approximately less thana $5 million gain for U.S. power $(10)and oil, a $5 million loss for coal, and a $15 million loss for natural gas, less than $(5) million for oil and $(5) million for coal.gas. Our estimates exclude correlation of oil with coal or natural gas. For example, a decline in oil or natural gas prices can be accompanied by a decline in coal price if commodity prices are correlated. In aggregate, the Company's downside exposure occurs


120 | 2021 Annual Report

with lower power, higherlower oil, higher natural gas, and higher coal prices. Exposures at individual businesses will change as new contracts or financial hedges are executed, and our sensitivity to changes in commodity prices generally increases in later years with reduced hedge levels at some of our businesses.
Commodity prices affect our businesses differently depending on the local market characteristics and risk management strategies. Spot power prices, contract indexation provisions, and generation costs can be directly or indirectly affected by movements in the price of natural gas, oil, and coal. We have some natural offsets across our businesses such that low commodity prices may benefit certain businesses and be a cost to others. Exposures are not perfectly linear or symmetric. The sensitivities are affected by a number of local or indirect market factors. Examples of these factors include hydrology, local energy market supply/demand balances, regional fuel supply issues, regional competition, bidding strategies, and regulatory interventions such as price caps. Operational flexibility changes the shape of our sensitivities. For instance, certain power plants may limit downside exposure by reducing dispatch in low market environments. Volume variation also affects our commodity exposure. The volume sold under contracts or retail concessions can vary based on weather and economic conditions, resulting in a higher or lower volume of sales in spot markets. Thermal unit availability and hydrology can affect the generation output available for sale and can affect the marginal unit setting power prices.
In the US and Utilities SBU, the generation businesses are largely contracted but may have residual risk to the extent contracts are not perfectly indexed to the business drivers. IPL primarily generatesAt Southland, our existing once-through cooling generation units (“Legacy Assets”) have been requested to continue operating beyond their current retirement date and have been approved for an extended permit for between one and three years. These assets have contracts in capacity and have seen incremental value in energy to meet its retail customer demand; however, it opportunistically sells surplus economic energy into wholesale markets at market prices.


revenues.
In the South America SBU, our business in Chile owns assets in the central and northern regions of the country and has a portfolio of contract sales in both. In the central region, the contract sales generally cover the efficient generation fromThe significant portion of our coal-fired and hydroelectric assets. Any residual spot price risk will primarily be driven by the amountPPAs include mechanisms of hydrological inflows. In the case of low hydroelectric generation, spot price exposure is capped by the ability to dispatch our natural gas/diesel assets,indexation that adjust the price of which dependsenergy based on fuel pricing atfluctuations in the time required. There is a small amountprice of coal, generationwith the specific indices and timing varying by contract, in order to mitigate changes in the northern region that isprice of fuel. For the portion of our contracts not covered byindexed to the portfolioprice of contract sales and therefore subjectcoal, we have implemented a hedging strategy based on international coal financial instruments for up to spot price risk. In both regions, under normal hydrology conditions, coal-firing generation sets the price. However, when there are spikes in price due to lower hydrology and higher demand, gas or oil-linked fuels generally set power prices.3 years. In Colombia, we operate under a short-termshorter-term sales strategy and have commoditywith spot market exposure to unhedgedfor uncontracted volumes. Because we own hydroelectric assets there, contracts are not indexed to fuel. Additionally, in Brazil, the hydroelectric generating facility is covered by contract sales. Under normal hydrological volatility, spot price risk is mitigated through a regulated sharing mechanism across all hydroelectric generators in the country. Under drier conditions, the sharing mechanism may not be sufficient to cover the business' contract position, and therefore it may have to purchase power at spot prices driven by the cost of thermal generation.
In the MCAC SBU, our businesses have commodity exposure on unhedged volumes. Panama is highly contracted under a portfolio of fixed volume contract sales.financial and load-following PPA type structures, exposing the business to hydrology-based variance. To the extent hydrological inflows are greater than or less than the contract sales volume,volumes, the business will be sensitive to changes in spot power prices which may be driven by oil and natural gas prices in some time periods. In the Dominican Republic, we own natural gas-fired assetsgas plants contracted under a portfolio of contract sales, and a coal-fired asset contracted with a single contract, and both contract and spot prices may move with commodity prices. Additionally, the contract levels do not always match our generation availability and our assets may be sellers of spot prices in excess of contract levels or a net buyer in the spot market to satisfy contract obligations.
In the Eurasia SBU, our Kilroot facility operates on a short-term sales strategy. To the extent that variable energy margin is unhedged, the commodity risk at our Kilroot business is to the clean dark spread, which is the difference between electricity priceassets operating in Vietnam and our coal-based variable dispatch cost, including emissions. Natural gas-fired generators set power prices for many periods, so higher natural gas prices generally expand margins and higher coal or emissions prices reduce them. Similarly, increased wind generators displace higher cost generation, potentially reducing Kilroot's margins, and vice versa. Two steam gas generating units at Ballylumford were shut down at the end of 2018 having reached the end of their economic lives. The open cycle gas turbines at both Ballylumford and Kilroot will continue to operate as peaking units at times of high demand. Our Mong Duong business hasBulgaria have minimal exposure to commodity price risk as it has no or minor merchant exposure and fuel is subject to a pass-through mechanism.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency risk and other foreign operations risks that arise from investments in foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. A key component of these risks stems from the fact that some of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates utilize currencies other than our consolidated reporting currency, the USD. Additionally, certain of our foreign subsidiaries and affiliates have entered into monetary obligations in USD or currencies other than their own functional currencies. Certain of our foreign subsidiaries calculate and pay taxes in currencies other than their own functional currency. We have varying degrees of exposure to changes in the exchange rate between the USD and the following currencies: Argentine peso, British pound, Brazilian real, Chilean peso, Colombian peso, Dominican peso, Euro, Indian rupee, and Mexican peso. These subsidiaries and affiliates have attempted to limit potential foreign exchange exposure by entering into revenue contracts that adjust to changes in foreign exchange rates. We also use foreign currency forwards, swaps, and options where possible to manage our risk related to certain foreign currency fluctuations.


121 | 2021 Annual Report

AES enters into foreign currency hedges to protect economic value of the business and minimize the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations to AES' portfolio. While protecting cash flows, the hedging strategy is also designed to reduce forward-looking earnings foreign exchange volatility. Due to variation of timing and amount between cash distributiondistributions and earnings exposure, the hedge impact may not fully cover the earnings exposure on a realized basis, which could result in greater volatility in earnings. The largest foreign exchange risks over a 12-month forward-looking period stem from the following currencies: Argentine peso, Brazilian real, Colombian peso, Euro, British pound, and Indian Rupee.Euro. As of December 31, 2018,2021, assuming a 10% USD appreciation, cash distributions attributable to foreign subsidiaries exposed to movement in the exchange rate of the Argentine peso and Euro each are projected to be reduced by $5 million, and the Colombian peso, Brazilian real, British pound and Indian Rupee each are projected to be impacted by less than $(5) million for Brazilian real and less than $5 million.million each for Colombian peso and Euro. These numbers have been produced by applying a one-time 10% USD appreciation to forecasted exposed cash distributions for 20192022 coming from the respective subsidiaries exposed to the currencies listed above, net of the impact of outstanding hedges and holding all other variables constant. The numbers presented above are net of any transactional gains/losses. These sensitivities may change in the future as new hedges are executed or existing hedges are unwound. Additionally,


updates to the forecasted cash distributions exposed to foreign exchange risk may result in further modification. The sensitivities presented do not capture the impacts of any administrative market restrictions or currency inconvertibility.
Interest Rate Risks
We are exposed to risk resulting from changes in interest rates as a result of our issuance of variablevariable-rate and fixed-rate debt, as well as interest rate swap, cap, floor, and option agreements.
Decisions on the fixed-floating debt mix are made to be consistent with the risk factors faced by individual businesses or plants. Depending on whether a plant's capacity payments or revenue stream is fixed or varies with inflation, we partially hedge against interest rate fluctuations by arranging fixed-ratefixed- or variable-rate financing. In certain cases, particularly for non-recourse financing, we execute interest rate swap, cap, and floor agreements to effectively fix or limit the interest rate exposure on the underlying financing. Most of our interest rate risk is related to non-recourse financings at our businesses.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the portfolio's pre-tax earnings exposure for 20192022 to a one-time 100-basis-point increase in interest rates for our Argentine peso, Brazilian real, Chilean peso, Colombian peso, Euro, and USD denominated debt would be approximately $20 million on interest expense for the debt denominated in these currencies. These amounts do not take into account the historical correlation between these interest rates.




122 | 2021 Annual Report

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Part A Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Our auditors are Ernst & Young LLP, located in Tysons, Virginia. Their PCAOB ID number is 42.
Part B Financial Statements and Supplementary Data



123 | 2021 Annual Report




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of The AES Corporation:Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The AES Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017, and2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 26, 2019,28, 2022, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue as a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and the amendments in ASUs 2015-14, 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12, 2016-20, 2017-10 and 2017-13 effective January 1, 2018.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures includeincluded examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.








124 | 2021 Annual Report

Goodwill Impairment Evaluation of the AES Andes Reporting Unit
Description of the Matter
At December 31, 2021, the Company’s goodwill balance was $1,177 million, of which $644 million relates to the AES Andes reporting unit. As disclosed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. The goodwill impairment test at the AES Andes reporting unit involves the use of significant unobservable inputs to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. This estimate of fair value is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit to determine whether goodwill is impaired.
Auditing the Company's measurement of the fair value of the AES Andes reporting unit involved a high degree of subjectivity given the lack of observable inputs to estimate the reporting unit’s fair value. Key inputs that had a significant impact on the valuation included the prospective financial information (including the estimated growth in renewable projects, forward electricity prices and developments in the Chilean capacity market) and the discount rate, which were forward-looking and based upon expectations about future economic and market conditions.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s goodwill impairment review process at the AES Andes reporting unit. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the valuation model, the significant assumptions used to develop the estimates, and the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the valuations.
To test the estimated fair value of the Company’s AES Andes reporting unit, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used to develop the estimate of fair value, testing the significant assumptions discussed above, and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company in its analyses. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends as well as historical results. We assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the reporting unit that would result from changes in the assumptions. We also involved valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the overall methodologies and the discount rate used in the fair value estimate.
Identification and Valuation of Long-Lived Asset Impairments and Re-evaluation of Useful Lives
Description of the MatterAt December 31, 2021, the Company's property, plant and equipment had an aggregate net carrying value of approximately $19,906 million. As disclosed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, when circumstances indicate the carrying amount of long-lived assets in a held-for-use asset group may not be recoverable, the Company evaluates the assets for potential impairment and re-evaluates the remaining useful life. These circumstances may include, but are not limited to, changes in the regulatory environment, demand, power prices or fuel costs, technological advancements, physical deterioration, or an expectation it is more likely than not that the asset will be disposed of before the end of its useful life. In 2021, as disclosed in Footnote 22 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognized a total asset impairment expense of $1,575 million, primarily related to the Company’s Puerto Rico, Ventanas 3 & 4 and Angamos asset groups.


125 | 2021 Annual Report

Auditing the Company's identification and evaluation of impairment indicators involved significant auditor judgment considering the many geographic, regulatory, and economic environments in which the Company operates. Similarly, auditing the Company’s re-evaluation of useful lives required a high degree of subjectivity, particularly as it related to the Company’s coal generation assets given the Company’s decarbonization initiatives and the potential risks associated with climate change that have led to increased regulation and other actions. These audit procedures required an evaluation of a wide variety of circumstances for potential changes in useful lives or impairment indicators. In addition, auditing the Company’s valuation of long-lived asset impairments involved significant judgment related to the estimation of the asset groups’ fair value. There was a high degree of subjectivity given the lack of observable inputs to estimate the fair value. Key inputs that had a significant impact on the valuation included the prospective financial information (including the expected retirement dates of the plants and the probabilities assigned to the different scenarios) and the discount rate, which were forward-looking and based upon expectations about future economic and market conditions.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over the identification of impairment indicators, estimation of useful lives (including any changes if necessary) and valuation of the long-lived asset impairments. For example, we tested management’s monitoring controls over businesses that have had been affected or are expected to be affected by the circumstances above. Our testing also included management’s review controls of the valuation model, the significant assumptions used to develop the estimates, and the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the valuations.
Our audit procedures included, among others, making inquiries of management (including personnel in operations) to understand changes in the businesses, reading industry journals and publications to independently identify changes in the regulatory environments or the geographic areas and evaluating whether management has considered identified changes, if any. We considered businesses for which current power prices are significantly less than contractual prices within Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) that are also near expiration. We also considered the Company’s ability to re-contract certain of its coal generation assets upon the expiration of a PPA, given the most recent legislative or regulatory changes. We evaluated the Company’s analysis of the useful lives of its coal generation assets, considering the existing PPAs and the Company’s ability to use the assets subsequent to the expiration of a PPA, based on any regulatory or market changes. For projects that were still under construction, we compared the Company's actual progress to their budgets, inspected engineering reports when considered appropriate, and considered project overruns. We reviewed disaggregated financial results for deterioration in earnings performance compared to prior periods, negative cash flows from operations, and working capital deficiencies and assessed whether these would represent impairment indicators, when applicable. We also considered and assessed conditions and trends in the industry and the underlying economies and evaluated sale or disposition activities.
When testing the impairment analyses for AES Puerto Rico, Ventanas and Angamos, our audit procedures included, among others, obtaining an understanding of management’s strategic view of the plants given the regulatory changes, evaluating management’s assessment of the lowest level of identifiable cash flows, assessing the appropriateness of methodologies, testing the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company in its analyses. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current industry and economic trends, latest regulations as well as historical results. We assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the asset groups that would result from changes in the assumptions. We also involved valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the overall methodology and the discount rate used in the fair value estimate.


126 | 2021 Annual Report

Accounting for the Merger of sPower and Distributed Energy Development Platforms
Description of the Matter
As disclosed in Footnote 25 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the merger of the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms to form AES Clean Energy Development in 2021. As part of the transaction, AES acquired an additional 25% ownership interest in the sPower development platform in exchange for a 25% ownership interest in specifically identified development entities of AES Renewable Holdings, certain future exit rights in the new partnership, and $7 million of cash. The acquisition of the sPower development platform was accounted for as a step acquisition as a result of the Company’s previously held interest. The sPower development assets were remeasured at their acquisition-date fair values resulting in a $214 million gain. The Company also recorded goodwill of $45 million representing the difference between the fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Auditing the Company’s accounting for the merger was complex due to the significant estimation in management’s determination of the fair value of the non-cash consideration transferred as well as the acquired assets. Specifically, the fair value of the sPower development pipeline and the intangible assets associated with the contracted and uncontracted projects acquired from sPower involved significant estimation uncertainty. The estimation uncertainty was primarily related to underlying assumptions about the future performance of the development projects or other unobservable inputs. The Company used a discounted cash flow model to measure the fair value of the development pipeline and acquired intangible assets. The significant assumptions used included discount rates and certain assumptions that form the basis of the forecasted results (e.g., pipeline capacity, developer profit, probability of project completion and expected timing of completion). These significant assumptions were forward looking and could be affected by future economic and market conditions.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s accounting for the step acquisition. For example, we tested controls over the recognition and measurement of the consideration transferred and intangible assets acquired, including management’s review of the valuation models, the significant assumptions used to develop the estimates, and the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the valuations.
To test the estimated fair value of the development pipeline and intangible assets, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, evaluating the Company's selection of the valuation methodology, evaluating the methods and significant assumptions used by the Company's valuation specialist, and evaluating the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the significant assumptions and estimates. For example, we compared the significant assumptions used by management to third-party industry data, the Company’s budgets and forecasts as well as historical results. We also involved valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the overall methodology and the discount rates used in the fair value estimate.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2008.

Tysons, Virginia
February 26, 2019
28, 2022




THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS127    
DECEMBER
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2018 AND 2017
 2018 2017
 (in millions, except share and per share data)
ASSETS   
CURRENT ASSETS   
Cash and cash equivalents$1,166
 $949
Restricted cash370
 274
Short-term investments313
 424
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $23 and $10, respectively1,595
 1,463
Inventory577
 562
Prepaid expenses130
 62
Other current assets807
 630
Current assets of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses57
 2,034
Total current assets5,015
 6,398
NONCURRENT ASSETS   
Property, Plant and Equipment:   
Land449
 502
Electric generation, distribution assets and other25,242
 24,119
Accumulated depreciation(8,227) (7,942)
Construction in progress3,932
 3,617
Property, plant and equipment, net21,396
 20,296
Other Assets:   
Investments in and advances to affiliates1,114
 1,197
Debt service reserves and other deposits467
 565
Goodwill1,059
 1,059
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $457 and $441, respectively436
 366
Deferred income taxes97
 130
Service concession assets, net of accumulated amortization of $0 and $206, respectively
 1,360
Loan receivable1,423
 
Other noncurrent assets1,514
 1,741
Total other assets6,110
 6,418
TOTAL ASSETS$32,521
 $33,112
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
CURRENT LIABILITIES   
Accounts payable$1,329
 $1,371
Accrued interest191
 228
Accrued non-income taxes250

252
Accrued and other liabilities962
 980
Non-recourse debt, including $479 and $1,012, respectively, related to variable interest entities1,659
 2,164
Current liabilities of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses8
 1,033
Total current liabilities4,399
 6,028
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES   
Recourse debt3,650
 4,625
Non-recourse debt, including $2,922 and $1,358 respectively, related to variable interest entities13,986
 13,176
Deferred income taxes1,280
 1,006
Other noncurrent liabilities2,723
 2,595
Total noncurrent liabilities21,639
 21,402
Commitments and Contingencies (see Notes 11 and 12)

 

Redeemable stock of subsidiaries879
 837
EQUITY   
THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 1,200,000,000 shares authorized; 817,203,691 issued and 662,298,096 outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 816,312,913 issued and 660,388,128 outstanding at December 31, 2017)8
 8
Additional paid-in capital8,154
 8,501
Accumulated deficit(1,005) (2,276)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(2,071) (1,876)
Treasury stock, at cost (154,905,595 and 155,924,785 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively)(1,878) (1,892)
Total AES Corporation stockholders’ equity3,208
 2,465
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS2,396
 2,380
Total equity5,604
 4,845
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$32,521
 $33,112
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 20162021 and 2020
 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue:     
Regulated$2,939
 $3,109
 $3,310
Non-Regulated7,797
 7,421
 6,971
Total revenue10,736
 10,530
 10,281
Cost of Sales:     
Regulated(2,473) (2,650) (2,839)
Non-Regulated(5,690) (5,415) (5,059)
Total cost of sales(8,163) (8,065) (7,898)
Operating margin2,573
 2,465
 2,383
General and administrative expenses(192) (215) (194)
Interest expense(1,056) (1,170) (1,134)
Interest income310
 244
 245
Loss on extinguishment of debt(188) (68) (13)
Other expense(58) (58) (80)
Other income72
 120
 64
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests984
 (52) 29
Asset impairment expense(208) (537) (1,096)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)(72) 42
 (15)
Other non-operating expense(147) 
 (2)
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF AFFILIATES2,018
 771
 187
Income tax expense(708) (990) (32)
Net equity in earnings of affiliates39
 71
 36
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS1,349
 (148) 191
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued businesses, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(2), $(21), and $229, respectively(9) (18) 151
Gain (loss) from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(44), $0, and $266, respectively225
 (611) (1,119)
NET INCOME (LOSS)1,565
 (777) (777)
Noncontrolling interests:     
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries(364) (359) (211)
Less: Loss (income) from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests2
 (25) (142)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$1,203
 $(1,161) $(1,130)
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax$985
 $(507) $(20)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax218
 (654) (1,110)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$1,203
 $(1,161) $(1,130)
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$1.49
 $(0.77) $(0.04)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.33
 (0.99) (1.68)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$1.82
 $(1.76) $(1.72)
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:     
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$1.48
 $(0.77) $(0.04)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.33
 (0.99) (1.68)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$1.81
 $(1.76) $(1.72)
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE$0.53
 $0.49
 $0.45

20212020
(in millions, except share and per share data)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents$943 $1,089 
Restricted cash304 297 
Short-term investments232 335 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5 and $13, respectively1,418 1,300 
Inventory604 461 
Prepaid expenses142 102 
Other current assets897 726 
Current held-for-sale assets816 1,104 
Total current assets5,356 5,414 
NONCURRENT ASSETS
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Land426 417 
Electric generation, distribution assets and other25,552 26,707 
Accumulated depreciation(8,486)(8,472)
Construction in progress2,414 4,174 
Property, plant and equipment, net19,906 22,826 
Other Assets:
Investments in and advances to affiliates1,080 835 
Debt service reserves and other deposits237 441 
Goodwill1,177 1,061 
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $385 and $330, respectively1,450 827 
Deferred income taxes409 288 
Other noncurrent assets, net of allowance of $23 and $21, respectively2,188 1,660 
Noncurrent held-for-sale assets1,160 1,251 
Total other assets7,701 6,363 
TOTAL ASSETS$32,963 $34,603 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable$1,153 $1,156 
Accrued interest182 191 
Accrued non-income taxes266 257 
Deferred income85 438 
Accrued and other liabilities1,120 1,223 
Non-recourse debt, including $302 and $336, respectively, related to variable interest entities1,367 1,430 
Current held-for-sale liabilities559 667 
Total current liabilities4,732 5,362 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Recourse debt3,729 3,446 
Non-recourse debt, including $2,223 and $3,918, respectively, related to variable interest entities13,603 15,005 
Deferred income taxes977 1,100 
Other noncurrent liabilities3,358 3,241 
Noncurrent held-for-sale liabilities740 857 
Total noncurrent liabilities22,407 23,649 
Commitments and Contingencies (see Notes 12 and 13)00
Redeemable stock of subsidiaries1,257 872 
EQUITY
THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock (without par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 1,043,050 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021)825 — 
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 1,200,000,000 shares authorized; 818,717,043 issued and 666,793,625 outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 818,398,654 issued and 665,370,128 outstanding at December 31, 2020)
Additional paid-in capital7,119 7,561 
Accumulated deficit(1,089)(680)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(2,220)(2,397)
Treasury stock, at cost (151,923,418 and 153,028,526 shares at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively)(1,845)(1,858)
Total AES Corporation stockholders’ equity2,798 2,634 
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS1,769 2,086 
Total equity4,567 4,720 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$32,963 $34,603 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.




128    
THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

 2018 2017 2016
 (in millions)
NET INCOME (LOSS)$1,565
 $(777) $(777)
Foreign currency translation activity:     
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax benefit of $2, $17, and $1, respectively(161) (9) 189
Reclassification to earnings, net of $0 income tax for all periods(21) 643
 992
Total foreign currency translation adjustments(182) 634
 1,181
Derivative activity:     
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $27, $10 and $(7), respectively(67) (12) 5
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $24, $1 and $8, respectively93
 50
 37
Total change in fair value of derivatives26
 38
 42
Pension activity:     
Change in pension adjustments due to prior service cost, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $1, $(1), and $(6) respectively(2) 2
 11
Change in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax benefit of $1, $6, and $106, respectively(1) (21) (208)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $2, $135, and $3 respectively8
 266
 10
Total pension adjustments5
 247
 (187)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)(151) 919
 1,036
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME1,414
 142
 259
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(425) (390) (262)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$989
 $(248) $(3)
Consolidated Statements of Operations

Years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
202120202019
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
Regulated$2,868 $2,661 $3,028 
Non-Regulated8,273 6,999 7,161 
Total revenue11,141 9,660 10,189 
Cost of Sales:
Regulated(2,448)(2,235)(2,484)
Non-Regulated(5,982)(4,732)(5,356)
Total cost of sales(8,430)(6,967)(7,840)
Operating margin2,711 2,693 2,349 
General and administrative expenses(166)(165)(196)
Interest expense(911)(1,038)(1,050)
Interest income298 268 318 
Loss on extinguishment of debt(78)(186)(169)
Other expense(60)(53)(80)
Other income410 75 145 
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests(1,683)(95)28 
Asset impairment expense(1,575)(864)(185)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)(10)55 (67)
Other non-operating expense— (202)(92)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF AFFILIATES(1,064)488 1,001 
Income tax benefit (expense)133 (216)(352)
Net equity in losses of affiliates(24)(123)(172)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS(955)149 477 
Gain from disposal of discontinued businesses, net of income tax expense of $1, $0, and $0, respectively
NET INCOME (LOSS)(951)152 478 
Less: Loss (income) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries542 (106)(175)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(409)$46 $303 
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax$(413)$43 $302 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(409)$46 $303 
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.62)$0.06 $0.46 
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 0.01 — 
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$(0.61)$0.07 $0.46 
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.62)$0.06 $0.45 
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax0.01 0.01 — 
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS$(0.61)$0.07 $0.45 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016
 THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS  
 Common Stock Treasury Stock 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Noncontrolling
Interests
(in millions)Shares Amount Shares Amount 
Balance at December 31, 2015815.8
 $8
 149.0
 $(1,837) $8,718
 $143
 $(3,883) $3,022
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 (1,130) 
 353
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 1,109
 72
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 30
 12
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 (12) (175)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 1,127
 (91)
Fair value adjustment (1)

 
 
 
 17
 (4) 
 (17)
Disposition of business interests (2)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 (10) 
 
 (430)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 60
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 
 
 (226) (71) 
 
Purchase of treasury stock
 
 8.7
 (79) 
 
 
 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax0.3
 
 (0.8) 12
 11
 
 
 
Sale of subsidiary shares to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 84
 (84) 
 17
Acquisition of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 (2) 
 
 (17)
Less: Net loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 11
Balance at December 31, 2016816.1
 $8
 156.9
 $(1,904) $8,592
 $(1,146) $(2,756) $2,906
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 (1,161) 
 384
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 661
 (27)
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 23
 15
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 229
 18
Total other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 913
 6
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (3)

 
 
 
 
 31
 
 
Fair value adjustment (1)

 
 
 
 (25) 
 
 
Disposition of business interests (2)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (666)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (426)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 11
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 
 
 (324) 
 
 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax0.2
 
 (1.0) 12
 5
 
 
 
Sale of subsidiary shares to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 13
 
 7
 83
Acquisition of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 240
 
 (40) 68
Less: Net loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14
Balance at December 31, 2017816.3
 $8
 155.9
 $(1,892) $8,501
 $(2,276) $(1,876) $2,380
Net income
 
 
 
 
 1,203
 
 360
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 (235) 53
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 14
 10
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax
 
 
 
 
 
 7
 (2)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 (214) 61
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (3)

 
 
 
 
 68
 19
 81
Fair value adjustment (1)

 
 
 
 (4) 
 
 
Disposition of business interests (2)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (250)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (343)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 
 
 (348) 
 
 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax0.9
 
 (1.0) 14
 8
 
 
 
Sale of subsidiary shares to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 (3) 
 
 98
Balance at December 31, 2018817.2
 $8
 154.9
 $(1,878) $8,154
 $(1,005) $(2,071) $2,396

(1) Adjustment to the carrying amount of noncontrolling interest and redeemable stock of subsidiaries to fair value.

129    
(2)
See Note 23—Held-for-Sale
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and Dispositions for further information.2019
202120202019
(in millions)
NET INCOME$(951)$152 $478 
Foreign currency translation activity:
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0, $(8), and $1, respectively(130)(52)(33)
Reclassification to earnings, net of $0 income tax for all periods192 23 
Total foreign currency translation adjustments(127)140 (10)
Derivative activity:
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit of $1, $110, and $74, respectively(368)(265)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $105, $17, and $12, respectively387 74 42 
Total change in fair value of derivatives392 (294)(223)
Pension activity:
Change in pension adjustments due to prior service cost, net of $0 income tax for all periods— 
Change in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(10), $4, and $10, respectively26 (14)(23)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $3, $0, and $13, respectively— 28 
Total pension adjustments27 (13)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)292 (167)(227)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)(659)(15)251 
Less: Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries438 (102)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION$(221)$(11)$149 
(3)
See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.


See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Statements.




THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS130    
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, AND 20162021, 2020, and 2019
THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS
Preferred StockCommon StockTreasury Stock
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Noncontrolling
Interests
(in millions)SharesAmountSharesAmountSharesAmount
Balance at December 31, 2018— $— 817.2 $154.9 $(1,878)$8,154 $(1,005)$(2,071)$2,396 
Net income— — — — — — — 303 — 182 
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax— — — — — — — — — (10)
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax— — — — — — — — (166)(57)
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax— — — — — — — — 12 (6)
Total other comprehensive loss— — — — — — — — (154)(73)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (1)
— — — — — — — 10 (4)— 
Fair value adjustment (2)
— — — — — — (6)— — — 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — — (415)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — — 
Sales to noncontrolling interests— — — — (5)— — 136 
Dividends declared on common stock ($0.5528/share)— — — — — — (367)— — — 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax— — 0.6 — (1.0)11 — — — — 
Balance at December 31, 2019— $— 817.8 $153.9 $(1,867)$7,776 $(692)$(2,229)$2,233 
Net income— — — — — — — 46 — 98 
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax— — — — — — — — 192 (52)
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax— — — — — — — — (237)(29)
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax— — — — — — — — (12)(1)
Total other comprehensive loss— — — — — — — — (57)(82)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (1)
— — — — — — — (34)— (16)
Fair value adjustment (2)
— — — — — — (4)— — — 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — — (419)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests— — — — — — (89)— (121)(49)
Sales to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — 260 — 210 
Issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries— — — — — — — — 111 
Dividends declared on AES common stock ($0.5804/share)— — — — — — (386)— — — 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax— — 0.6 — (0.9)— — — 
Balance at December 31, 2020— $— 818.4 $153.0 $(1,858)$7,561 $(680)$(2,397)$2,086 
Net loss— — — — — — — (409)— (536)
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax— — — — — — — — (83)(44)
Total change in derivative fair value, net of income tax— — — — — — — — 247 126 
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax— — — — — — — — 24 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)— — — — — — — — 188 85 
Fair value adjustment (2)
— — — — — — (4)— — — 
Disposition of business interests (3)
— — — — — — — — — (132)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — — (281)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests— — — — — — (9)— (11)(4)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — — 220 
Sales to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — (7)— — 180 
Issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries— — — — — — — — — 151 
Issuance of preferred stock1.0 825 — — — — (16)— — — 
Dividends declared on AES common stock ($0.6095/share)— — — — — — (406)— — — 
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax— — 0.3 — (1.0)13 — — — — 
Balance at December 31, 20211.0 $825 818.7 $152.0 $(1,845)$7,119 $(1,089)$(2,220)$1,769 
(1) See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.
 2018 2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:(in millions)
Net income (loss)$1,565
 $(777) $(777)
Adjustments to net income (loss):     
Depreciation and amortization1,003
 1,169
 1,176
Loss (gain) on disposal and sale of business interests(984) 52
 (29)
Impairment expenses355
 537
 1,098
Deferred income taxes313
 672
 (793)
Provisions for contingencies14
 34
 48
Loss on extinguishment of debt188
 68
 20
Loss on sale and disposal of assets27
 43
 38
Net loss (gain) from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses(269) 611
 1,383
Other317
 160
 180
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable(206) (177) 237
(Increase) decrease in inventory(36) (28) 42
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets(22) 107
 870
(Increase) decrease in other assets(32) (295) (251)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities62
 163
 (619)
Increase (decrease) in income tax payables, net and other tax payables(7) 53
 (199)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities55
 112
 473
Net cash provided by operating activities2,343
 2,504
 2,897
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:     
Capital expenditures(2,121) (2,177) (2,345)
Acquisitions of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash acquired(66) (609) (52)
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash sold2,020
 108
 538
Sale of short-term investments1,302
 3,540
 4,904
Purchase of short-term investments(1,411) (3,310) (5,151)
Contributions to equity investments(145) (89) (6)
Other investing(84) (62) (24)
Net cash used in investing activities(505) (2,599) (2,136)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:     
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities1,865
 2,156
 1,465
Repayments under the revolving credit facilities(2,238) (1,742) (1,433)
Issuance of recourse debt1,000
 1,025
 500
Repayments of recourse debt(1,933) (1,353) (808)
Issuance of non-recourse debt1,928
 3,222
 2,978
Repayments of non-recourse debt(1,411) (2,360) (2,666)
Payments for financing fees(39) (100) (105)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(340) (424) (476)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests and redeemable security holders43
 73
 190
Proceeds from the sale of redeemable stock of subsidiaries
 
 134
Dividends paid on AES common stock(344) (317) (290)
Payments for financed capital expenditures(275) (179) (113)
Purchase of treasury stock
 
 (79)
Proceeds from sales to noncontrolling interests, net of transaction costs
 94
 
Other financing101
 (52) (44)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(1,643) 43
 (747)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(54) 8
 37
(Increase) decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses74
 (128) (42)
Total increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash215
 (172) 9
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning1,788
 1,960
 1,951
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, ending$2,003
 $1,788
 $1,960
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:     
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized$1,003
 $1,196
 $1,273
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds370
 377
 487
SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:     
Non-cash acquisition of intangible assets16
 
 
Non-cash contributions of assets and liabilities for the Fluence transaction (see Note 7)20
 
 
Non-cash exchange of debentures for the acquisition of the Guaimbê Solar Complex (see Note 24)119
 
 
Non-cash acquisition of the remaining interest in a Distributed Energy equity affiliate (see Note 24)23
 
 
Dividends declared but not yet paid90
 86
 174
Conversion of Alto Maipo loans and accounts payable into equity (see Note 14)
 279
 
Return Share Transfer Payment due (see Note 23)
 75
 
(2) Adjustment to record the redeemable stock of Colon at fair value.
(3) See Note 24Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Statements.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016


131    

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019
202120202019
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:(in millions)
Net income (loss)$(951)$152 $478 
Adjustments to net income (loss):
Depreciation and amortization1,056 1,068 1,045 
Loss (gain) on disposal and sale of business interests1,683 95 (28)
Impairment expense1,575 1,066 277 
Deferred income taxes(406)(233)(8)
Provisions for (reversals of) contingencies(10)(186)
Loss on extinguishment of debt78 186 169 
Gain on remeasurement to acquisition date fair value(254)— — 
Loss of affiliates, net of dividends36 128 194 
Emissions allowance expense337 135 143 
Other120 54 232 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable(170)48 73 
(Increase) decrease in inventory(93)(20)28 
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets(168)13 42 
(Increase) decrease in other assets(285)(134)(20)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities(251)(186)(6)
Increase (decrease) in income tax payables, net and other tax payables(271)59 (83)
Increase (decrease) in deferred income(314)431 28 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities190 79 (101)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,902 2,755 2,466 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures(2,116)(1,900)(2,405)
Acquisitions of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash acquired(658)(136)(192)
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash sold95 169 178 
Sale of short-term investments616 627 666 
Purchase of short-term investments(519)(653)(770)
Contributions and loans to equity affiliates(427)(332)(324)
Affiliate repayments and returns of capital320 158 131 
Purchase of emissions allowances(265)(188)(137)
Other investing(97)(40)132 
Net cash used in investing activities(3,051)(2,295)(2,721)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities2,802 2,420 2,026 
Repayments under the revolving credit facilities(2,420)(2,479)(1,735)
Issuance of recourse debt3,419 — 
Repayments of recourse debt(26)(3,366)(450)
Issuance of non-recourse debt1,644 4,680 5,828 
Repayments of non-recourse debt(2,012)(4,136)(4,831)
Payments for financing fees(32)(107)(126)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(284)(422)(427)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests(117)(259)— 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests365 17 
Sales to noncontrolling interests173 553 128 
Issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries153 112 — 
Issuance of preferred stock1,014 — — 
Dividends paid on AES common stock(401)(381)(362)
Payments for financed capital expenditures(24)(60)(146)
Other financing(45)(53)(8)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities797 (78)(86)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(46)(24)(18)
(Increase) decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of held-for-sale businesses55 (103)(72)
Total increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(343)255 (431)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning1,827 1,572 2,003 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, ending$1,484 $1,827 $1,572 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized$815 $908 $946 
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds459 333 363 
SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Notes payable issued for the acquisition of business interests (see Notes 17 and 25)258 47 — 
Non-cash consideration transferred for Clean Energy acquisitions (see Note 25)118 — — 
Dividends declared but not yet paid105 100 95 
Refinancing of non-recourse debt at Mong Duong— — 1,081 
Contributions to equity affiliates— — 61 
Partial reinvestment of consideration from the sPower transaction— — 58 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


132 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. GENERAL AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The AES Corporation is a holding company (the "Parent Company") that, through its subsidiaries and affiliates, (collectively, "AES" or "the Company") operates a geographically diversified portfolio of electricity generation and distribution businesses. Generally, the liabilities of individual operating entities are non-recourse to the Parent Company and are isolated to the operating entities. Most of our operating entities are structured as limited liability entities, which limit the liability of shareholders. The structure is generally the same regardless of whether a subsidiary is consolidated under a voting or variable interest model. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("USU.S. GAAP").
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION — The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of The AES Corporation and its controlled subsidiaries. Furthermore, VIEs in which the Company has an ownership interest and is the primary beneficiary, thus controlling the VIE, have been consolidated. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. Investments in entities where the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS — Noncontrolling interests are classified as a separate component of equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity. Additionally, net income and comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests are reflected separately from consolidated net income and comprehensive income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity. Any change in ownership of a subsidiary while the controlling financial interest is retained is accounted for as an equity transaction between the controlling and noncontrolling interests (unless the transaction qualified as a sale of in-substance real estate).interests. Losses continue to be attributed to the noncontrolling interests, even when the noncontrolling interests' basis has been reduced to zero.
Equity securities with redemption features that are not solely within the control of the issuer are classified outside of permanent equity. Generally, initial measurement will be at fair value. Subsequent measurement and classification vary depending on whether the instrument is probable of becoming redeemable. When the equity instrument is not probable of becoming redeemable, subsequent allocation of income and dividends is classified in permanent equity. For those securities where it is probable that the instrument will become redeemable or that are currently redeemable, AES recognizes changes in the fair value at each accounting period against retained earnings or additional paid-in-capital in the absence of retained earnings, subject to the floor of the initial fair value. Further, the allocation of income and dividends, as well as the adjustment to fair value, is classified outside permanent equity. Instruments that are mandatorily redeemable are classified as a liability.
EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS — Investments in entities over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and reported in Investments in and advances to affiliates on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of these companies is included in our results Net equity in losses of operations.affiliates on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company utilizes the cumulative earning approach to determine whether distributions received from equity method investees are returns on investment or returns of investment. The Company discontinues the application of the equity method when an investment is reduced to zero and the Company is not otherwise committed to provide further financial support to the investee. The Company resumes the application of the equity method accounting to the extent that net income is greater than the share of net losses not previously recorded.
Upon acquiring the investment, we determine the fair value of the identifiable assets and assumed liabilities and the basis difference between each fair value and the carrying amount of the corresponding asset or liability in the financial statements of the investee. The AES share of the amortization of the basis difference is recognized in Net equity in earningslosses of affiliates in the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the life of the asset or liability.
The Company periodically assesses if impairment indicators exist at our equity method investments. When an impairment is observed, any excess of the carrying amount over its estimated fair value is recognized as impairment expense when the loss in value is deemed other-than-temporary and included in Other non-operating expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


133 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

BUSINESS INTERESTS — Acquisitions and disposals of business interests are generally transactions pertaining to operational legal entities, which may be accounted for as a consolidated business, an asset, or an equity method

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

investment. Losses on expected sales of business interests are limited to the impairment of long-lived assets as of the date of execution of the sales agreement.agreement, which are recognized in Asset impairment expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Any additional gains/(losses) on salesupon the completion of disposals, which include reclassification of cumulative translation adjustments, are recognized in Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations upon completion of the sale.
ALLOCATION OF EARNINGS — Certain of the Company's businesses are subject to profit-sharing arrangements where the allocation of cash distributions and the sharing of tax benefits are not based on fixed ownership percentages. These arrangements exist for certain U.S. renewable generation partnerships to designate different allocations of value among investors, where the allocations change in form or percentage over the life of the partnership. For these businesses, the Company uses the hypothetical liquidation at book value (“HLBV”) method when it is a reasonable approximation of the profit-sharing arrangement. The HLBV method calculates the proceeds that would be attributable to each partner based on the liquidation provisions of the respective operating partnership agreement if the partnership was to be liquidated at book value at the balance sheet date. Each partner’s share of income in the period is equal to the change in the amount of net equity they are legally able to claim based on a hypothetical liquidation of the entity at the end of a reporting period compared to the beginning of that period, adjusted for any capital transactions.
The HLBV method is used both to allocate the equity earnings attributable to AES when the Company accounts for the renewable business as an equity method investment and to calculate the earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest when the business is consolidated by AES. Where, prior toIn the commencementearly months of operating activities foroperations of a respective renewable energygeneration facility where HLBV results in an immediatea significant decrease in the hypothetical liquidation proceeds attributable to the tax equity investor due to the recognition of ITCsinvestment tax credits ("ITCs") or other adjustments as required by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the Company records the impact (sometimes referred to as the ‘Day one gain’) to income in the same period.
USE OF ESTIMATES USU.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the asset and liability balances reported as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Items subject to such estimates and assumptions include: the carrying amount and estimated useful lives of long-lived assets; asset retirement obligations; impairment of goodwill, long-lived assets and equity method investments; valuation allowances for receivables and deferred tax assets; the recoverability of regulatory assets; regulatory liabilities; the fair value of financial instruments; the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired as business combinations or as asset acquisitions by variable interest entities; contingent consideration arising from business combinations or asset acquisitions by variable interest entities; the measurement of equity method investments or noncontrolling interest using the HLBV method for certain renewable generation partnerships; pension liabilities; the incremental borrowing rates used in the determination of whether a sale of noncontrolling interests is considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate (as opposed to an equity transaction); pension liabilities; environmentallease liabilities; the impactdetermination of U.S. tax reform;lease and non-lease components in certain generation contracts; environmental liabilities; and potential litigation claims and settlements.
HELD-FOR-SALE DISPOSAL GROUPS— A disposal group classified as held-for-sale is reflected on the balance sheet at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell. A loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the disposal group exceeds its estimated fair value less cost to sell. This loss is limited to the carrying value of long-lived assets until the completion of the sale, at which point, any additional loss is recognized. If the fair value of the disposal group subsequently exceeds the carrying amount while the disposal group is still held-for-sale, any impairment expense previously recognized will be reversed up to the lesser of the previously recognized expense or the subsequent excess.
Assets and liabilities related to a disposal group classified as held-for-sale are segregated in the current balance sheet in the period in which the disposal group is classified as held-for-sale. Assets and liabilities of held-for-sale disposal groups are classified as current when they are expected to be disposed of within twelve months. Transactions between the held-for-sale disposal group and businesses that are expected to continue to exist after the disposal are not eliminated to appropriately reflect the continuing operations and balances held-for-sale. See Note 23—24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS — Discontinued operations reporting occurs only when the disposal of a business or a group of businesses represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results. The Company reports financial results for discontinued operations


134 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

separately from continuing operations to distinguish the financial impact of disposal transactions from ongoing operations. Prior period amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Balance Sheets are retrospectively revised to reflect the businesses determined to be discontinued operations. The cash flows of

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

businesses that are determined to be discontinued operations are included within the relevant categories within operating, investing and financing activities on the face of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. 
Transactions between the businesses determined to be discontinued operations and businesses that are expected to continue to exist after the disposal are not eliminated to appropriately reflect the continuing operations and balances held-for-sale. The results of discontinued operations include any gain or loss recognized on closing or adjustment of the carrying amount to fair value less cost to sell, including gains or losses associated with noncontrolling interests upon completion of the disposal transaction. Adjustments related to components previously reported as discontinued operations under prior accounting guidance are presented as discontinued operations in the current period even if the disposed-of component to which the adjustments are related would not meet the criteria for presentation as a discontinued operation under current guidance. See Note 22—Discontinued Operationsfor further information.
FAIR VALUE — Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly, hypothetical transaction between market participants at the measurement date, or exit price. The Company applies the fair value measurement accounting guidance to financial assets and liabilities in determining the fair value of investments in marketable debt and equity securities, included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet line items Short-term investments and Other noncurrent assets; derivative assets, included in Other current assets and Other noncurrent assets; and, derivative liabilities, included in Accrued and other liabilities (current) and Other noncurrent liabilities. The Company applies the fair value measurement guidance to nonfinancial assets and liabilities upon the acquisition of a business or of an asset acquisition by a variable interest entity, or in conjunction with the measurement of an asset retirement obligation or a potential impairment loss on an asset group, equity method investments, or goodwill.
When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be reflected at their fair values, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the assets or liabilities, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of nonperformance. The Company is prohibited from including transaction costs and any adjustments for blockage factors in determining fair value.
In determining fair value measurements, the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Assets and liabilities are categorized within a fair value hierarchy based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair values of the assets or liabilities.
Any transfers between all levels within the fair value hierarchy levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — The Company considers unrestricted cash on hand, cash balances not restricted as to withdrawal or usage, deposits in banks, certificates of deposit and short-term marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.
RESTRICTED CASH AND DEBT SERVICE RESERVES — Cash balances restricted as to withdrawal or usage, primarily via contract, are considered restricted cash.


135 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

The following table provides a summary of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets that reconcile to the total of such amounts as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in millions):
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$1,166
 $949
Restricted cash370
 274
Debt service reserves and other deposits467
 565
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$2,003
 $1,788


THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Cash and cash equivalents$943 $1,089 
Restricted cash304 297 
Debt service reserves and other deposits237 441 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$1,484 $1,827 
INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES — The Company's marketable investments are primarily unsecured debentures, certificates of deposit, government debt securities and money market funds.
Short-term investments consist of marketable equity securities and debt securities with original maturities in excess of three months with remaining maturities of less than one year. Marketable debt securities where the Company has both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost.cost, net of any allowance for credit losses in accordance with ASC 326. Remaining marketable debt securities are classified as available-for-sale or trading and are carried at fair value.
Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale debt securities that are not credit-related are reflected in AOCL, a separate component of equity, and the Consolidated Statements of Operations, respectively. Comprehensive Income (Loss). Any credit-related impairments are recognized as an allowance with a corresponding impact recognized as a credit loss in Other Expense. Unrealized gains or losses on equity investments are reported in Other income. Interest and dividends on investments are reported in Interest income and Other income, respectively. Gains and losses on sales of investments are determined using the specific identification method.
ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS — Accounts and notes receivable are carried at amortized cost. The Company periodically assesses the collectability of accounts receivable, considering factors such as historical collection experience, the age of accounts receivable and other currently available evidence supporting collectability, and records an allowance for doubtful accounts in accordance with ASC 326 for the estimated uncollectible amount as appropriate. Credit losses on accounts and notes receivable are generally recognized in Cost of Sales. Certain of our businesses charge interest on accounts receivable. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. When collection of such interest is not reasonably assured, interest income is recognized as cash is received. Individual accounts and notes receivable are written off when they are no longer deemed collectible.
INVENTORY — Inventory primarily consists of fuel and other raw materials used to generate power, and operational spare parts and supplies used to maintain power generation and distribution facilities. Inventory is carried at lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is the sum of the purchase price and expenditures incurred to bring the inventory to its existing location. Inventory is primarily valued using the average cost method. Generally, if it is expected fuel inventory will not be recovered through revenue earned from power generation, an impairment is recognized to reflect the fuel at marketnet realizable value. The carrying amount of spare parts and supplies is typically reduced only in instances where the items are considered obsolete.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS — Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, assets under capitalfinance leases and intangible assets subject to amortization (i.e., finite-lived intangible assets).
Property, plant and equipment — Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The cost of renewals and improvements that extend the useful life of property, plant and equipment are capitalized.
Construction progress payments, engineering costs, insurance costs, salaries, interest and other costs directly relating to construction in progress are capitalized during the construction period, provided the completion of the construction project is deemed probable, or expensed at the time construction completion is determined to no longer be probable. The continued capitalization of such costs is subject to risks related to successful completion, including those related to government approvals, site identification, financing, construction permitting and contract compliance. Construction-in-progress balances are transferred to electric generation and distribution assets when an asset group is ready for its intended use. Government subsidies, liquidated damages recovered for construction delays, and income tax credits are recorded as a reduction to property, plant and equipment and reflected in cash flows from investing activities. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.


136 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

Depreciation, after consideration of salvage value and asset retirement obligations, is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are determined on a composite or component basis. Capital spare parts, including rotable spare parts, are included in electric generation and distribution assets. If the spare part is considered a component, it is depreciated over its useful life after the part is placed in service. If the spare part is deemed part of a composite asset, the part is depreciated over the composite useful life even when being held as a spare part.
Certain of the Company's subsidiaries operate under concession contracts. Certain estimates are utilized to determine depreciation expense for the subsidiaries, including the useful lives of the property, plant and equipment and the amounts to be recovered at the end of the concession contract. The amounts to be recovered under these concession contracts are based on estimates that are inherently uncertain and actual amounts recovered may differ

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

from those estimates. These concession contracts are not within the scope of ASC 853—Service Concession Arrangements.
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization — Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives which range from 1 – 50 years and are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet line item Other intangible assets. The Company accounts for purchased emission allowances as intangible assets and records an expense when they are utilized or sold. Granted emission allowances are valued at zero.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets — When circumstances indicate the carrying amount of long-lived assets in a held-for-use asset group may not be recoverable, the Company evaluates the assets for potential impairment using internal projections of undiscounted cash flows resulting from the use and eventual disposal of the assets. Events or changes in circumstances that may necessitate a recoverability evaluation include, but are not limited to, adverse changes in the regulatory environment, unfavorable changes in power prices or fuel costs, increased competition due to additional capacity in the grid, technological advancements, declining trends in demand, or an expectation it is more likely than not that the asset will be disposed of before the end of its previously estimated useful life. If the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment expense is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value (subject to the carrying amount not being reduced below fair value for any individual long-lived asset that is determinable without undue cost and effort). An impairment expense for certain assets may be reduced by the establishment of a regulatory asset if recovery through approved rates is probable.
SERVICE CONCESSION ASSETS — Service concession assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization, in accordance with ASC 853. Service concession assets represent the cost of all infrastructure to be transferred to the public-sector entity grantors at the end of the concession. These costs primarily represent construction progress payments, engineering costs, insurance costs, salaries, interest and other costs directly relating to construction of the service concession infrastructure. Government subsidies, liquidated damages recovered for construction delays and income tax credits are recorded as a reduction to Service Concession Assets. Service concession assets are amortized and recognized in earnings as a cost of goods sold as infrastructure construction revenue is recognized. Services provided under concession arrangements are recognized on a straight line basis. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company derecognized the service concession assets and recognized a loan receivable under ASC 606. See further detail in the new accounting pronouncements discussion below.
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS — Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt are deferred and presented as a direct reduction from the face amount of that debt and amortized over the related financing period using the effective interest method. Debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit or revolving credit facility are deferred and presented as an asset and amortized over the related financing period. Make-whole payments in connection with early debt retirements are classified as cash flows used in financing activities.
GOODWILL AND INDEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS — The Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances necessitate an evaluation for impairment. The Company's annual impairment testing date is October 1.1st.
Goodwill — Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of the business acquisition over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill resulting from an acquisition is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the acquisition. Generally, each AES business with a goodwill balance constitutes a reporting unit as they are not similar to other businesses in a segment nor are they reported to segment management together with other businesses.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment either under the qualitative assessment option or the quantitative test option to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. If goodwill is determined to be impaired, an impairment loss measured at the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill, is recorded.
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets — The Company's indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily include land-use rights and water rights. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are evaluated for impairment either under the qualitative assessment option or the two-step quantitative test. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset being tested for impairment exceeds its fair value, the excess is recognized as impairment expense.


137 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES — Accounts payable consists of amounts due to trade creditors related to the Company's core business operations. These payables include amounts owed to

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

vendors and suppliers for items such as energy purchased for resale, fuel, maintenance, inventory and other raw materials. Other accrued liabilities include items such as income taxes, regulatory liabilities, legal contingencies and employee-related costs, including payroll, and benefits.
REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — The Company recognizes assets and liabilities that result from regulated ratemaking processes. Regulatory assets generally represent incurred costs which have been deferred due to the probable future recovery via customer rates. Generally, returns earned on regulatory assets are reflected in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations within Interest Income. Regulatory liabilities generally represent obligations to refund customers. Management continually assesses whether regulatory assets are probable of future recovery and regulatory liabilities are probable of future payment by considering factors such as applicable regulatory changes, recent rate orders applicable to other regulated entities, and the status of any pending or potential deregulation legislation. If future recovery of costs previously deferred ceases to be probable, the related regulatory assets are written off and recognized in income from continuing operations.
PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT PLANS — The Company recognizes in its Consolidated Balance Sheets an asset or liability reflecting the funded status of pension and other postretirement plans with current-year changes in actuarial gains or losses recognized in AOCL, except for those plans at certain of the Company's regulated utilities that can recover portions of their pension and postretirement obligations through future rates. All plan assets are recorded at fair value. AES follows the measurement date provisions of the accounting guidance, which require a year-end measurement date of plan assets and obligations for all defined benefit plans.
INCOME TAXES — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of the existing assets and liabilities, and their respective income tax basis. The Company establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company's tax positions are evaluated under a more likely than not recognition threshold and measurement analysis before they are recognized for financial statement reporting.
Uncertain tax positions have been classified as noncurrent income tax liabilities unless expected to be paid within one year. The Company's policy for interest and penalties related to income tax exposures is to recognize interest and penalties as a component of the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has elected to treat GILTI as an expense in the period in which the tax is accrued. Accordingly, no deferred tax assets or liabilities are recorded related to GILTI.
The Company applies the flow-through method to account for its investment tax credits.
The Company's accounting policy for releasing the income tax effects from AOCL occurs on a portfolio basis.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS — The Company records the fair value of a liability for a legal obligation to retire an asset in the period in which the obligation is incurred. When a new liability is recognized, the Company capitalizes the costs of the liability by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the obligation, the Company eliminates the liability and, based on the actual cost to retire, may incur a gain or loss.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION — A business's functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the business operates and is generally the currency in which the business generates and expends cash. Subsidiaries and affiliates whose functional currency is a currency other than the U.S. dollar translate their assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rates in effect at the end of the fiscal period. Adjustments arising from the translation of the balance sheet of such subsidiaries are included in AOCL. The revenue and expense accounts of such subsidiaries and affiliates are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates for the period. Gains and losses on intercompany foreign currency transactions that are long-term in nature and which the Company does not intend to settle in the foreseeable future, are also recognized in AOCL. Gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in determining net income. Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified from AOCL to net income only when realized upon sale or upon complete or


138 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

substantially complete liquidation of the investment in a foreign entity. The accumulated adjustments are included in carrying amounts in impairment assessments where the Company has committed to a plan that will cause the accumulated adjustments to be reclassified to earnings.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

REVENUE RECOGNITION — Revenue is earned from the sale of electricity from our utilities, and the production and sale of electricity and capacity from our generation facilities, and development and construction of generation facilities. Revenue is recognized upon the transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue is recorded net of any taxes assessed on and collected from customers, which are remitted to the governmental authorities.
Utilities Our utilities sell electricity directly to end-users, such as homes and businesses, and bill customers directly. The majority of our utility contracts have a single performance obligation, as the promises to transfer energy, capacity, and other distribution and/or transmission services are not distinct. Additionally, as the performance obligation is satisfied over time as energy is delivered, and the same method is used to measure progress, the performance obligation meets the criteria to be considered a series. Utility revenue is classified as regulated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In exchange for the right to sell or distribute electricity in a service territory, our utility businesses are subject to government regulation. This regulation sets the framework for the prices (“tariffs”) that our utilities are allowed to charge customers for electricity. Since tariffs are determined by the regulator, the price that our utilities have the right to bill corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the utility's performance completed in each period. The Company also has some month-to-month contracts. Revenue under these contracts is recognized using an output method measured by the MWh delivered each month, which best depicts the transfer of goods or services to the customer, at the approved tariff.
The Company has businesses where it sells and purchases power to and from ISOs and RTOs. Our utility businesses generally purchase power to satisfy the demand of customers that is not contracted through separate PPAs. In these instances, the Company accounts for these transactions on a net hourly basis because the transactions are settled on a net hourly basis. In limited situations, a utility customer may choose to receive generation services from a third-party provider, in which case the Company may serve as a billing agent for the provider and recognize revenue on a net basis.
Generation — Most of our generation fleet sells electricity under contracts to customers such as utilities, industrial users, and other intermediaries. Our generation contracts, based on specific facts and circumstances, can have one or more performance obligations as the promise to transfer energy, capacity, and other services may or may not be distinct depending on the nature of the market and terms of the contract. As the performance obligations are generally satisfied over time and use the same method to measure progress, the performance obligations meet the criteria to be considered a series. In measuring progress toward satisfaction of a performance obligation, the Company applies the "right to invoice" practical expedient when available, and recognizes revenue in the amount to which the Company has a right to consideration from a customer that corresponds directly with the value of the performance completed to date. Revenue from generation businesses is classified as non-regulated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revenue from generation contracts is recognized using an output method, as energy and capacity delivered best depicts the transfer of goods or services to the customer. Performance obligations to deliver energy are generally satisfied when the MW is generated. Performance obligations for capacity and ancillary services (such as operations and maintenance and dispatch services) are satisfied over time as the Company stands ready to perform under the terms of the contract. In certain contracts, if plant availability exceeds a contractual target, the Company may receive a performance bonus payment, or if the plant availability falls below a guaranteed minimum target, we may incur a non-availability penalty. Such bonuses or penalties represent a form of variable consideration and are estimated and recognized when it is probable that there will not be a significant reversal.
For contracts determined to have multiple performance obligations, we allocate revenue to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price using a market or expected cost plus margin approach. Additionally, the Company allocates variable consideration to one or more, but not all, distinct goods or services that form part of a single performance obligation when (1) the variable consideration relates specifically to the efforts to transfer the distinct good or service and (2) the variable consideration depicts the amount to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised good or service to the customer.
Revenue from


139 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

Certain generation contracts is recognized using an output method, as energy andcontain operating leases where capacity delivered best depicts the transfer of goods or services to the customer. Performance obligations including energy or ancillary services (such as operations and maintenance and dispatch services)payments are generally measured byconsidered lease elements. In such cases, the MWh delivered. Capacity, whichallocation between the lease and non-lease elements is a stand-ready obligation to deliver energy when required bymade at the customer, is measured using MWs. In certain contracts, if plant availability exceeds a contractual target,inception of the Company may receive a performance bonus payment, or iflease following the plant availability falls below a guaranteed minimum target, we may incur a non-availability penalty. Such bonuses or penalties represent a form of variable consideration and are estimated and recognized when it is probable that there will not be a significant reversal.guidance in ASC 842.
In assessing whether variable quantities are considered variable consideration or an option to acquire additional goods and services, the Company evaluates the nature of the promise and the legally enforceable rights in the contract. In some contracts, such as requirement contracts, the legally enforceable rights merely give the customer a right to purchase additional goods and services which are distinct. In these contracts, the customer's action results in a new obligation, and the variable quantities are considered an option.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

When energy or capacity is sold or purchased in the spot market or to ISOs, the Company assesses the facts and circumstances to determine gross versus net presentation of spot revenues and purchases. Generally, the nature of the performance obligation is to sell surplus energy or capacity above contractual commitments, or to purchase energy or capacity to satisfy deficits. Generally, on an hourly basis, a generator is either a net seller or a net buyer in terms of the amount of energy or capacity transacted with the ISO. In these situations, the Company recognizes revenue for the hours where the generator is a net seller and cost of sales for the hours where the generator is a net buyer.
Certain generation contracts contain operating leases where capacity payments are generally considered lease elements. In such cases, the allocation between the lease and non-lease elements is made at the inception of the lease following the guidance in ASC 840. Minimum lease payments from such contracts are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term whereas contingent rentals are recognized when earned.
The transaction price allocated to a construction performance obligation is recognized as revenue over time as construction activity occurs, with revenue being fully recognized upon completion of construction. These contracts may include a difference in timing between revenue recognition and the collection of cash receipts, which may be collected over the term of the entire arrangement. The timing difference could result in a significant financing component for the construction performance obligation if determined to be a material component of the transaction price. The Company accounts for a significant financing component under the effective interest rate method, recognizing a long-term receivable for the expected future payments related to the construction performance obligation in the Loan Receivable line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As payments are collected from the customer over the term of the contract, consideration related to the construction performance obligation is bifurcated between the principal repayment of the long-term receivable and the related interest income, recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Contract Balances — The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in accounts receivable and contract liabilities. Accounts receivable represent unconditional rights to consideration and consist of both billed amounts and unbilled amounts typically resulting from sales under long-term contracts when revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer. We bill both generation and utilities customers on a contractually agreed-upon schedule, typically at periodic intervals (e.g., monthly). The calculation of revenue earned but not yet billed is based on the number of days not billed in the month, the estimated amount of energy delivered during those days and the estimated average price per customer class for that month.
Our contract liabilities consist of deferred revenue which is classified as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to recognize revenue. The current portion of our contract liabilities is reported in Accrued and other liabilities and the noncurrent portion is reported in Other noncurrent liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Remaining Performance Obligations — The transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations represents future consideration for unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) performance obligations at the end of the reporting period. The Company has elected to apply the optional disclosure exemptions under ASC 606. Therefore, the amount disclosed in Note 20—Revenueexcludes contracts with an original length of one year or less, contracts for which we recognize revenue based on the amount we have the right to invoice for services performed, and variable consideration allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation when the consideration relates specifically to our efforts to satisfy the performance obligation and depicts the amount to which we expect to be entitled. As such, consideration for energy is excluded from the amount disclosed as the variable consideration relates to the amount of energy delivered and reflects the value the Company expects to receive for the energy transferred. Estimates of revenue expected to be recognized in future periods also exclude unexercised customer options to purchase additional goods or services that do not represent material rights to the customer.
LEASES — The Company has operating and finance leases for energy production facilities, land, office space, transmission lines, vehicles and other operating equipment in which the Company is the lessee. Operating leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet, but are expensed on a straight-line


140 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

basis over the lease term. The Company’s leases do not contain any material residual value guarantees, restrictive covenants or subleases.
Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term while lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized on commencement of the lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Generally, the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable; as such, we use the subsidiaries’ incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company determines discount rates based on its existing credit rates of its unsecured borrowings, which are then adjusted for the appropriate lease term and currency. The right-of-use asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives that are paid or payable to the lessee at commencement. The lease term includes the option to extend or terminate the lease if it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised.
The Company has operating leases for certain generation contracts that contain provisions to provide capacity to a customer, which is a stand-ready obligation to deliver energy when required by the customer in which the Company is the lessor. Capacity payments are generally considered lease elements as they cover the majority of available output from a facility. The allocation of contract payments between the lease and non-lease elements is made at the inception of the lease. Fixed lease payments from such contracts are recognized as lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term, whereas variable lease payments are recognized when earned.
The Company has sales-type leases for BESS in which the Company is the lessor. These arrangements allow customers the ability to determine when to charge and discharge the BESS, representing the transfer of control and constitutes the arrangement as a sales-type lease. Upon commencement of the lease, the book value of the leased asset is removed from the balance sheet and a net investment in sales-type lease is recognized based on the present value of fixed payments under the contract and the residual value of the underlying asset.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION — The Company grants share-based compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock units, performance stock units, and performance cash units. The expense is based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instrument issued and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to its employees.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES — General and administrative expenses include corporate and other expenses related to corporate staff functions and initiatives, primarily executive management, finance, legal, human resources and information systems, which are not directly allocable to our business segments. Additionally, all costs associated with corporate business development efforts are classified as general and administrative expenses.
DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES — Under the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging, the Company recognizes all contracts that meet the definition of a derivative, except those designated as normal purchase or normal sale at inception, as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. See Note 4—5—Fair Value and Fair value in this section for additional discussion regarding the determination of fair value.
PPAs and fuel supply agreements are evaluated to assess if they contain either a derivative or an embedded derivative requiring separate valuation and accounting. Generally, these agreements do not meet the definition of a derivative, often due to the inability to be net settled. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the markets for commodities to be delivered under these agreements to determine if facts and circumstances have changed such that the agreements could be net settled and meet the definition of a derivative.
The Company typically designates its derivative instruments as cash flow hedges if they meet the criteria specified in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge the variability of expected future cash interest payments. Foreign currency contracts are used to reduce risks arising from the change in fair value of certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. The objective of these practices is to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on operating results. The Company also enters into commodity contracts to economically hedge price variability inherent in electricity sales arrangements. The objectives of the commodity contracts are to minimize the impact of variability in spot electricity prices and stabilize estimated revenue streams. The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes.


141 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

For our hedges, changes in fair value that are considered highly effective are deferred in AOCL and are recognized into earnings as the hedged transactions affect earnings. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

immediately. If a derivative is no longer highly effective, hedge accounting will be discontinued prospectively. For cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions, AES estimates the future cash flows of the forecasted transactions and evaluates the probability of the occurrence and timing of such transactions.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges are immediately recognized in earnings. Regardless of when gains or losses on derivatives are recognized in earnings, they are generally classified as interest expense for interest rate and cross-currency derivatives, foreign currency transaction gains or losses for foreign currency derivatives, and non-regulated revenue or non-regulated cost of sales for commodity and other derivatives. Cash flows arising from derivatives are included in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as an operating activity given the nature of the underlying risk being economically hedged and the lack of significant financing elements, except that cash flows on designated and qualifying hedges of variable-rate interest during construction are classified as an investing activity. The Company has elected not to offset net derivative positions in the financial statements.
CREDIT LOSSES In accordance with ASC 326, the Company records an allowance for current expected credit losses (“CECL”) for accounts and notes receivable, financing receivables, contract assets, net investments in leases recognized as a lessor, held-to-maturity debt securities, financial guarantees related to the non-payment of a financial obligation, and off-balance sheet credit exposures not accounted for as insurance. The CECL allowance is based on the asset's amortized cost and reflects management's expected risk of credit losses over the remaining contractual life of the asset. CECL allowances are estimated using relevant information about the collectibility of cash flows and consider information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions. See New Accounting Pronouncements below for further information regarding the impact on the Company's financial statements upon adoption of ASC 326.
The following table represents the rollforward of the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated (in millions):
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2021
Accounts Receivable (1)
Mong Duong Loan Receivable (2)
Argentina ReceivablesOtherTotal
CECL reserve balance at beginning of period$$32 $20 $$62 
Current period provision— — 16 
Write-offs charged against allowance(11)— — — (11)
Recoveries collected(2)— — — 
Foreign exchange— — (4)— (4)
CECL reserve balance at end of period$$30 $23 $$63 

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2020
Accounts Receivable (1)
Mong Duong Loan Receivable (2)
Argentina ReceivablesOtherTotal
CECL reserve balance at beginning of period$$34 $29 $$68 
Current period provision11 — — 12 
Write-offs charged against allowance(9)— — — (9)
Recoveries collected(2)(1)— — 
Foreign exchange— — (9)— (9)
CECL reserve balance at end of period$$32 $20 $$62 
_____________________________
(1)Excludes operating lease receivable allowances and contractual dispute allowances of $2 million and $4 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Those reserves are not in scope under ASC 326.
(2)Mong Duong loan receivable credit losses allowance was reclassified toheld-for-sale assetson the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS The following table provides a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that had an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Accounting pronouncements not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





142 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

New Accounting Standards Adopted
ASU Number and NameDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on the financial statements upon adoption
2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service ContractThis standard aligns the accounting for implementation costs incurred for a cloud computing arrangement that is a service with the requirement for capitalizing implementation costs associated with developing or obtaining internal-use software.

Transition method: retrospective or prospective.
October 1, 2018
The Company elected to early-adopt this standard on a prospective basis, effective for fiscal year 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the financial statements.
2018-14, Compensation— Retirement Benefits — Defined Benefit Plans — General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework
This standard modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.

Transition method: retrospective.
Early adoption elected, January 1, 2018Impact limited to changes in financial statement disclosures.
2017-07, Compensation — Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
This standard changes the presentation of non-service costs associated with defined benefit and other postretirement plans and updates the guidance so that only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization.

Transition method: retrospective for presentation of non-service cost and prospective for the change in capitalization.
January 1, 2018For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, $1 million and $3 million of non-service costs associated with defined benefit and other postretirement plans were reclassified from Costs of Sales to Other Expense, respectively.
2017-05, Other Income — Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Topic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets
This standard clarifies the scope and application of ASC 610-20 on the sale, transfer, and derecognition of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to non-customers, including partial sales. It also provides guidance on how gains and losses on transfers of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to non-customers are recognized. The standard also clarifies that the derecognition of businesses is under the scope of ASC 810. The standard must be adopted concurrently with ASC 606, however an entity will not have to apply the same transition method as ASC 606.

Transition method: modified retrospective.
January 1, 2018
Following adoption of ASU 2017-01, fewer transactions are expected to meet the definition of a business under the scope of ASC 810 and will fall under the scope under this standard.


THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

2017-04, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill ImpairmentThis standard simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by removing the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if it had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, it requires that an entity record an impairment charge based on the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

Transition method: prospective.
October 1, 2018In anticipation of our annual goodwill process, the Company early-adopted this standard to ease the administrative burden for the measurement of any potential goodwill impairment losses. There was no impact to the financial statements upon adoption of the standard.
2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business
The standard requires an entity to first evaluate whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, and if that threshold is met, the set is not a business. As a second step, at least one substantive process should exist to be considered a business.

Transition method: prospective.
January 1, 2018Some acquisitions and dispositions are expected to now fall under a different accounting model. This will reduce the number of transactions that are accounted for as business combinations and therefore future acquired goodwill.
2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
This standard requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.
Transition method: retrospective.
January 1, 2018For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, cash provided by operating activities increased by $15 million and $13 million, respectively, cash used in investing activities decreased by $150 million and increased by $28 million, respectively, and cash provided by financing activities was unchanged.
2016-01,2016-13, 2018-19, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2020-02, 2020-03, Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10)Credit Losses (Topic 326): Recognition and Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesInstruments
The standard significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. It also amends certain disclosures of financial instruments.

Transition method: modified retrospective. Prospective for equity investments without readily determinable fair value.
January 1, 2018No material impact upon adoption of the standard.
2014-09, 2015-14, 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12, 2016-20, 2017-10, 2017-13, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

See discussion of the ASU below.

January 1, 20182020See impact upon adoption of the standard below.
2016-02, 2018-01, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-20, 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842)ASC 842 was adopted by sPower on January 1, 2020. sPower was not required to adopt ASC 842 using the public adoption date, as sPower is an equity method investee that meets the definition of a public business entity only by virtue of the inclusion of its summarized financial information in the Company’s SEC filings.January 1, 2020The adoption of this standard resulted in a $4 million decrease to accumulated deficit attributable to the AES Corporation stockholders’ equity.
ASC 326 Financial Instruments Credit Losses
On January 1, 2018,2020, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers,"ASC 326 Financial Instruments — Credit Losses and its subsequent corresponding updates ("(“ASC 606"326”). Under thisThe new standard updates the impairment model for financial assets measured at amortized cost, known as the Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans, and other instruments, entities are required to use a new forward-looking "expected loss" model that generally results in the earlier recognition of an entity shall recognize revenueallowance for credit losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities measure credit losses as it was done under previous GAAP, except that unrealized losses due to depictcredit-related factors are now recognized as an allowance on the transfer of promised goods or servicesbalance sheet with a corresponding adjustment to customersearnings in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. income statement.
The Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption to the contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the previous revenue recognition standard. For contracts that were modified before January 1, 2018,326. Under this transition method, the Company reflectedapplied the aggregate effecttransition provisions starting at the date of all modifications when identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, determining the transaction price and allocating the transaction price.
adoption. The cumulative effect to our January 1, 2018 Consolidated Balance Sheet resulting fromof the adoption of ASC 606326 on our January 1, 2020 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was as follows (in millions):

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
Balance at
December 31, 2019
Adjustments Due to ASC 326
Balance at
January 1, 2020
Assets
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $20$1,479 $— $1,479 
Other current assets (1)
802 (2)800 
Deferred income taxes156 165 
Loan receivable, net of allowance of $32 (2)
1,351 (32)1,319 
Other noncurrent assets (3)
1,635 (30)1,605 
Liabilities and Equity
Accumulated deficit$(692)$(39)$(731)
Noncontrolling interests2,233 (16)2,217 
THE AES CORPORATION_________________________
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(1)Other current assets include the short-term portion of the Mong Duong loan receivable, which was reclassified to Current held-for-sale assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021.
DECEMBER(2)Loan receivable at Mong Duong was reclassified to Noncurrent held-for-sale assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016
2021.

(3)Other noncurrent assets include Argentina financing receivables.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Balance at
December 31, 2017
 Adjustments Due to ASC 606 
Balance at
January 1, 2018
Assets     
Other current assets$630
 $61
 $691
Deferred income taxes130
 (24) 106
Service concession assets, net1,360
 (1,360) 
Loan receivable
 1,490
 1,490
Equity     
Accumulated deficit(2,276) 67
 (2,209)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,876) 19
 (1,857)
Noncontrolling interest2,380
 81
 2,461
Mong Duong — The Mong Duong II power plant in Vietnam is the primary driver of changes in revenue recognitioncredit reserves under the new standard. This plant is operated under a build, operate, and transfer (“BOT”) contract and will be transferred to the Vietnamese government after the completion of a 25-year PPA. Under the previous revenue recognition standard, construction costs were deferred to a service concession asset, which was expensed in proportion to revenue recognized for the construction element over the term of the PPA. Under ASC 606, construction revenue and associated costs are recognized as construction activity occurs. As construction of the plant was substantially completed in 2015, revenues and costs associated with the construction were recognized through retained earnings, and the service concession asset was derecognized. A loan receivable was recognized in 2018 upon the adoption of ASC 606 in order to account for the future expected payments for the construction performance obligation.obligation portion of the BOT contract. As the payments for the construction performance obligation occur over a 25-year term, a significant financing element was determined to exist which is accounted for under the effective interest rate method. The other performance obligationHistorically, the Company has not incurred any losses on this arrangement, of which no directly comparable assets exist in the market. In order to operate and maintain the facility is measured based on the capacity made available.
The impact to our Consolidated Balance Sheetdetermine expected credit losses under ASC 326 arising from this $1.4 billion loan receivable as of January 1, 2020, the Company considered average historical default and recovery rates on similarly rated sovereign bonds, which formed an initial basis for developing a probability of default, net of expected recoveries, to be applied as a key credit quality indicator for this arrangement. A resulting estimated loss rate of 2.4% was applied to the weighted-average remaining life of the loan receivable, after adjustments for certain asset-specific characteristics, including the Company’s status as a large foreign direct investor in Vietnam, Mong Duong’s status as critical energy infrastructure in Vietnam, and cash flows from the


143 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

operations of the plant, which are under the Company’s control until the end of the BOT contract. As a result of this analysis, the Company recognized an opening CECL reserve of $34 million as an adjustment to Accumulated deficit and Noncontrolling interests as of January 1, 2020.
Argentina — Exposure toCAMMESA, the administrator of the wholesale energy market in Argentina, is the driver of credit reserves in Argentina. As discussed in Note 7Financing Receivables, the Company has credit exposures through the FONINVEMEM Agreements, other agreements related to resolutions passed by the Argentine government in which AES Argentina will receive compensation for investments in new generation plants and technologies, as well as regular accounts receivable balances. The timing of collections depends on corresponding agreements and collectability of these receivables are assessed on an ongoing basis.
Collection of the principal and interest on these receivables is subject to various business risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the continued operation of power plants which generate cash for payments of these receivables, regulatory changes that could impact the timing and amount of collections, and economic conditions in Argentina. The Company monitors these risks, including the credit ratings of the Argentine government, on a quarterly basis to assess the collectability of these receivables. Historically, the Company has not incurred any credit-related losses on these receivables. In order to determine expected credit losses under ASC 326, the Company considered historical default probabilities utilizing similarly rated sovereign bonds and historic recovery rates for Argentine government bond defaults. This information formed an initial basis for developing a probability of default, net of expected recoveries, to be applied as a key credit quality indicator across the underlying financing receivables. A resulting estimated weighted average loss rate of 41.2% was applied to the remaining balance of these receivables, after adjustments for certain asset-specific characteristics, including AES Argentina’s role in providing critical energy infrastructure to Argentina, our history of collections on these receivables, and the average term that the receivables are expected to be outstanding. As a result of this analysis, the Company recognized an opening CECL reserve of $29 million as an adjustment to Accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2020.
Other financial assetsApplication of ASC 326 to the Company’s $1.5 billion of trade accounts receivable and $326 million of available-for-sale debt securities at January 1, 2020 did not result in any material adjustments, primarily due to the short-term duration and high turnover of these financial assets. Additionally, a large portion of our trade accounts receivables and amounts reserved for doubtful accounts under legacy GAAP arise from arrangements accounted for as an operating lease under ASC 842, which are excluded from the scope of ASC 326.
As discussed in Note 7Financing Receivables, AES Andes recorded $33 million of noncurrent receivables at December 31, 2018 resulting from2020 pertaining to revenues recognized on regulated energy contracts that were impacted by the adoptionStabilization Fund created by the Chilean government in October 2019. The Company expects to collect these noncurrent receivables through the execution of ASC 606sale agreements with third parties. However, given the investment grade rating of Chile and the history of zero credit losses for regulated customers, management determined that no incremental CECL reserves were required to be recognized as compared to the previous revenue recognition standard was as follows (in millions):of January 1, 2020.


 December 31, 2018
Consolidated Balance SheetAs Reported Balances Without Adoption of ASC 606 Adoption Impact
Assets     
Other current assets$807
 $741
 $66
Deferred income taxes97
 122
 (25)
Service concession assets, net
 1,261
 (1,261)
Loan receivable1,423
 
 1,423
TOTAL ASSETS32,521
 32,318
 203
Equity     
Accumulated deficit(1,005) (1,112) 107
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(2,071) (2,088) 17
Noncontrolling interest2,396
 2,317
 79
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY32,521
 32,318
 203
144 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
The impact to our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 resulting from the adoption of ASC 606 as compared to the previous revenue recognition standard was as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
Consolidated Statement of OperationsAs Reported Balances Without Adoption of ASC 606 Adoption Impact
Total revenue$10,736
 $10,800
 $(64)
Total cost of sales(8,163) (8,207) 44
Operating margin2,573
 2,593
 (20)
Interest income310
 252
 58
Other Income72
 70
 2
Income from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates2,018
 1,978
 40
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS1,349
 1,309
 40
NET INCOME1,565
 1,525
 40
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION1,203
 1,163
 40
New Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective The following table provides a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements once adopted. Accounting pronouncements not listed below were assessed and determined to

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

be either not applicable or are expected to have no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective
ASU Number and NameDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on the financial statements upon adoption
2018-02, Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 220), Reclassification805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with CustomersThis update is to improve the accounting for acquired revenue contracts with customers in a business combination by addressing diversity in practice and inconsistency related to the following: 1. Recognition of Certain Tax Effects from AOCIThis amendment allows a reclassificationan acquired contract liability 2. Payment terms and their effect on subsequent revenue recognized by the acquirer. Early adoption of the stranded tax effects resulting fromamendments is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. An entity that early adopts in an interim period should apply the implementationamendments (1) retrospectively to all business combinations for which the acquisition date occurs on or after the beginning of the Tax Cutsfiscal year that includes the interim period of early application and Jobs Act from AOCI(2) prospectively to retained earnings. Because this amendment only relates toall business combinations that occur on or after the reclassificationdate of the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected.initial application.January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.
For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
The Company does not expect anyis currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements uponstatements.
2021-05, Leases (Topic 842), Lessors—Certain Leases with Variable Lease PaymentsThe amendments in this update affect lessors with lease contracts that (1) have variable lease payments that do not depend on a reference index or a rate and (2) would have resulted in the recognition of a selling loss at lease commencement if classified as sales-type or direct financing. Lessors should classify and account for a lease with variable lease payments that do not depend on a reference index or a rate as an operating lease if both of the following criteria are met: (a) The lease would have been classified as a sales-type lease or a direct financing lease in accordance with the classification criteria in paragraphs 842-10-25-2 through 25-3, (b) The lessor would have otherwise recognized a day-one loss. This update could be applied either (1) retrospectively to leases that commenced or were modified on or after the adoption of Update 2016-02 or (2) prospectively to leases that commence or are modified on or after the standard on January 1, 2019.
2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
The standard updatesdate that an entity first applies the hedge accounting model to expand the ability to hedge nonfinancial and financial risk components, reduce complexity, and ease certain documentation and assessment requirements. When facts and circumstances are the same as at the previous quantitative test, a subsequent quantitative effectiveness test is not required. The standard also eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. For cash flow hedges, this means that the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument will be recorded in other comprehensive income and amounts deferred will be reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item in the period in which it settles.

Transition method: modified retrospective with the cumulative effect adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the initialamendments. Earlier application date. Prospective for presentation and disclosures.
January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.
For fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
Upon adoption, the Company expects that the majority of our Battery Storage lease arrangements will qualify as operating leases under the new guidance, which should reduce the likelihood of recognizing day-one losses on these arrangements in the future. Losses on these arrangements of $13 million, $0, and $36 million were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
2016-13, Financial2020-06, Debt - Debt with conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Equity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurementand Contracts in an Equity’s Own EquityThe amendments in this update affect entities that issue convertible instruments and/or contracts indexed to and potentially settled in an entity’s own equity. The new ASU eliminates the beneficial conversion and cash conversion accounting models for convertible instruments. It also amends the accounting for certain contracts in an entity’s own equity that are currently accounted for as derivatives because of Credit Losses on Financial Instrumentsspecific settlement provisions. In addition, the new guidance modifies how particular convertible instruments and certain contracts that may be settled in cash or shares impact the diluted EPS computation.
The standard updates the impairment model for financial assets measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward-looking "expected loss" model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses as it is done today, except that the losses will be recognized as an allowance rather than a reduction in the amortized cost of the securities.

Transition method: various.
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted only as of January 1, 2019.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on its consolidated financial statements.
2016-02, 2018-01, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-20 Leases2020-04 and 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 842)See discussion848): Facilitation of the ASU below.Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial ReportingJanuary 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.The amendments in these updates provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference to LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued by reference rate reform, and clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. These amendments are effective for a limited period of time (March 12, 2020 - December 31, 2022).Effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022.The Company will adoptis currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on January 1, 2019; see below for the evaluation of the impact of its adoption on the consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016-02 and its subsequent corresponding updates require lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases, and recognize expenses in a manner similar to the current accounting method. For lessors, the guidance modifies the lease classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. The guidance also eliminates current real estate-specific provisions.
The standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. The FASB has provided an optional transition method, which the Company has elected, that allows entities to continue to apply the guidance in ASC 840 Leases to the comparative periods presented in the year of adoption. Under this transition method, the Company will apply the transition provisions starting on January 1, 2019.
The Company has elected to apply a package of practical expedients that allow lessees and lessors not to reassess: (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (2) lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (3) whether initial direct costs for any expired or existing leases qualify for capitalization under ASC 842. These three practical expedients must be elected as a package and must be consistently applied to all leases. The Company has also elected to apply an optional transition practical expedient for land easements that allows an entity to continue applying its current accounting policy for all land easements that exist before the standard’s effective date that were not previously accounted for under ASC 840.
The Company established a task force focused on the identification of contracts that are under the scope of the new standard and the assessment and measurement of their corresponding right-of-use assets and related liabilities. Additionally, the implementation team has been working on the configuration of a lease accounting tool that will support the implementation and the subsequent accounting. The implementation team has also evaluated

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016


145 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
changes to our business processes, systems and controls to support recognition and disclosure under the new standard.
Under ASC 842, it is expected that fewer contracts will contain a lease. However, due to the elimination of the real estate-specific guidance and changes to certain lessor classification criteria, more leases will qualify as sales-type leases and direct financing leases. Under these two models, a lessor will derecognize the asset and will recognize a lease receivable. According to ASC 842, the lease receivable includes the fair value of the plant after the contract period but does not include any variable payments such as margin on the sale of energy. Therefore, the lease receivable could be significantly different than the carrying amount of the underlying asset at lease commencement. In such circumstances, the difference between the initially recognized lease receivable and the carrying amount of the underlying asset is recognized as a gain/loss at lease commencement.
The primary expected impact as of the effective date is the recognition of approximately $300 million of lease liabilities and the corresponding right of use assets for all contracts that contain an operating lease and for which the Company is the lessee. In addition, the Company expects to reclassify various account balances to different line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheet to reflect the new presentation requirements. Consolidated Statement of Operations presentation and the expense recognition pattern are not expected to change for lessees.
2. INVENTORY
Inventory is valued primarily using the average-cost method. The following table summarizes the Company's inventory balances as of the dates indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017
Fuel and other raw materials $300
 $284
Spare parts and supplies 277
 278
Total $577
 $562

December 31,20212020
Fuel and other raw materials$366 $223 
Spare parts and supplies238 238 
Total$604 $461 
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following table summarizes the components of the electric generation and distribution assets and other property, plant and equipment (in millions) with their estimated useful lives (in years). The amounts are stated net of all prior asset impairment losses recognized.
   December 31,
 Estimated Useful Life2018 2017
Electric generation and distribution facilities7-40 $22,875
 $21,529
Other buildings5-72 1,651
 1,971
Furniture, fixtures and equipment3-25 310
 284
Other5-44 406
 335
Total electric generation and distribution assets and other  25,242
 24,119
Accumulated depreciation  (8,227) (7,942)
Net electric generation and distribution assets and other  $17,015
 $16,177

Estimated Useful LifeDecember 31,
(in years)20212020
Electric generation and distribution facilities5-39$22,909 $24,239 
Other buildings5-511,552 1,507 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment3-30356 333 
Other1-39735 628 
Total electric generation and distribution assets and other25,552 26,707 
Accumulated depreciation(8,486)(8,472)
Net electric generation and distribution assets and other$17,066 $18,235 
The following table summarizes depreciation expense (including the amortization of assets recorded under capitalfinance leases in 2021, 2020 and 2019, and the amortization of asset retirement obligations) and interest capitalized during development and construction on qualifying assets for the periods indicated (in millions):
Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016Years Ended December 31,202120202019
Depreciation expense $960
 $1,005
 $1,002
Depreciation expense$972 $1,004 $977 
Interest capitalized during development and construction 199
 139
 118
Interest capitalized during development and construction226 307 238 
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, of $11$9 billion and $10 billion was mortgaged, pledged or subject to liens as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, including assets classified as held-for-sale.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

The following table summarizes regulated and non-regulated generation and distribution property, plant and equipment and accumulated depreciation as of the dates indicated (in millions):
December 31,20212020
Regulated generation and distribution assets and other, gross$9,151 $8,858 
Regulated accumulated depreciation(3,655)(3,329)
Regulated generation and distribution assets and other, net5,496 5,529 
Non-regulated generation and distribution assets and other, gross16,401 17,849 
Non-regulated accumulated depreciation(4,831)(5,143)
Non-regulated generation and distribution assets and other, net11,570 12,706 
Net electric generation and distribution assets and other$17,066 $18,235 
December 31, 2018 2017
Regulated generation, distribution assets and other, gross $8,959
 $8,093
Regulated accumulated depreciation (3,504) (3,357)
Regulated generation, distribution assets and other, net 5,455
 4,736
Non-regulated generation, distribution assets and other, gross 16,283
 16,026
Non-regulated accumulated depreciation (4,723) (4,585)
Non-regulated generation, distribution assets and other, net 11,560
 11,441
Net electric generation, distribution assets and other $17,015
 $16,177
4. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The following table presents amounts recognized related to asset retirement obligations for the periods indicated (in millions):


146 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

 2018 201720212020
Balance at January 1 $368
 $357
Balance at January 1$462 $428 
Additional liabilities incurred 19
 1
Additional liabilities incurred27 42 
Liabilities assumed in acquisitionLiabilities assumed in acquisition96 — 
Liabilities settled (14) (21)Liabilities settled(15)(20)
Accretion expense 18
 16
Accretion expense22 22 
Change in estimated cash flows 24
 25
Change in estimated cash flows13 
Sale of plantsSale of plants— (13)
Other 
 (10)Other— 
Balance at December 31 $415
 $368
Balance at December 31$606 $462 
The Company's asset retirement obligations include active ash landfills, water treatment basins and the removal or dismantlement of certain plants and equipment. The $24 million increase in estimated cash flows in 2018 is primarily due to an increase of $55 million in estimated ash pond closure costs and revised closure dates associated with an EPA rule regulating CCR at IPL and an increase in coal pile remediation costs at DPL. These were partially offset by a decrease of $32 million due to reductions in estimated closure costs associated with ash ponds and landfills at DPL resulting in a reduction to Cost of Sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company useduses the cost approach to determine the fairinitial value of the ARO liabilities, which wasis estimated by discounting expected cash outflows to their present value using market basedmarket-based rates at the initial recording of the liabilities. Cash outflows wereare based on the approximate future disposal costs as determined by market information, historical information or other management estimates. Subsequent downward revisions of ARO liabilities are discounted using the market-based rates that existed when the liability was initially recognized. These inputs to the fair value of the ARO liabilities are considered Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company increased the asset retirement obligations and corresponding assets at AES Clean Energy and Chile by $93 million and $36 million, respectively. The increase at AES Clean Energy is mostly due to the initial recognition of asset retirement obligations as a result of the New York Wind acquisition. The increase at Chile is primarily due to shortened useful lives of the Ventanas and Angamos coal plants, additional liabilities incurred due to the development of the Andes Solar 2b plant, and an upward revision of estimated cash flows at the Los Cururos plant.
4.During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company increased the asset retirement obligations and corresponding assets at Chile and AES Hawaii, by $17 million and $12 million, respectively, and decreased the asset retirement obligation at DPL by $13 million. The increase at Chile is mostly due to the initial recognition of the ARO at the Andes Solar 2b plant. The increase at AES Hawaii reflects the shortened useful life of the coal plant resulting from the passage of Senate Bill 2629, which prohibits issuing or renewing permits for coal power plants after December 31, 2022 and calls for ceasing all coal burning for electricity generation by that date. The decrease at DPL is attributable to the sale of the Hutchings facility in December 2020.
5. FAIR VALUE
The fair value of current financial assets and liabilities, debt service reserves, and other deposits approximate their reported carrying amounts. The estimated fair values of the Company's assets and liabilities have been determined using available market information. Because these amounts are estimates and based on hypothetical transactions to sell assets or transfer liabilities, the use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Valuation Techniques The fair value measurement accounting guidance describes three main approaches to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities: (1) market approach, (2) income approach, and (3) cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value amount. The measurement is based on current market expectations of the return on those future amounts. The cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace an asset. The Company measures its investments and derivatives at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, in connection with annual or event-driven impairment evaluations, certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include long-lived tangible assets (i.e., property, plant and equipment), goodwill, and intangible assets (e.g., sales concessions, land use rights and water rights, etc.). In general, the Company determines the fair value of investments and derivatives using the market approach and the income approach, respectively. In the nonrecurring measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities, all three approaches are considered; however, the value estimated under the income approach is often the most representative of fair value.


147 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Investments — The Company's investments measured at fair value generally consist of marketable debt and equity securities. Equity securities are either measured at fair value using quoted market prices or based on comparisons to market data obtained for similar assets. Debt securities primarily consist of unsecured debentures and certificates of deposit held by our Brazilian subsidiaries. Returns and pricing on these instruments are generally indexed to the market interest rates in Brazil. Debt securities are measured at fair value based on comparisons to market data obtained for similar assets.
Derivatives — Derivatives are measured at fair value using quoted market prices or the income approach utilizing volatilities, spot and forward benchmark interest rates (such as LIBOR and EURIBOR), foreign exchange rates, credit data, and commodity prices, as applicable. When significant inputs are not observable, the Company uses relevant techniques to determine the inputs, such as regression analysis or prices for similarly traded instruments available in the market.
The Company's methodology to fair value its derivatives is to start with any observable inputs; however, in certain instances the published forward rates or prices may not extend through the remaining term of the contract, and management must make assumptions to extrapolate the curve, which necessitates the use of unobservable inputs, such as proxy commodity prices or historical settlements to forecast forward prices. Specifically, where there is limited forward curve data with respect to foreign exchange contracts beyond the traded points, the Company utilizes the interest rate differential approach to construct the remaining portion of the forward curve. Similarly, in certain instances, the spread that reflects the credit or nonperformance risk is unobservable, requiring the use of proxy yield curves of similar credit quality.
To determine the fair value of a derivative, cash flows are discounted using the relevant spot benchmark interest rate. The Company then makes a credit valuation adjustment ("CVA"), as applicable, by further discounting the cash flows for nonperformance or credit risk based on the observable or estimated debt spread of the Company's subsidiary or its counterparty and the tenor of the respective derivative instrument. The CVA for potential future scenarios in which the derivative is in an asset position is based on the counterparty's credit ratings, credit default swap spreads, and debt spreads, as available. The CVA for potential future scenarios in which the derivative is in a liability position is based on the Parent Company's or the subsidiary's current debt spread. In the absence of readily obtainable credit information, the Parent Company's or the subsidiary's estimated credit rating (based on applying a standard industry model to historical financial information and then considering other relevant information) and spreads of comparably rated entities or the respective country's debt spreads are used as a proxy. All derivative instruments are analyzed individually and are subject to unique risk exposures.
The fair value hierarchy of an asset or a liability is based on the level of significance of the input assumptions. An input assumption is considered significant if it affects the fair value by at least 10%. Assets and liabilities are classified as Level 3 when the use of unobservable inputs is significant. When the use of unobservable inputs is insignificant, assets and liabilities are classified as Level 2. Transfers between Level 3 and Level 2 are determined as of the end of the reporting period and result from changes in significance of unobservable inputs used to calculate the CVA.
Debt — Recourse and non-recourse debt are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of recourse debt is estimated based on quoted market prices. The fair value of non-recourse debt is estimated based upon interest rates and other features of the loan. In general, the carrying amount of variable rate debt is a close approximation of its fair value. For fixed rate loans, the fair value is estimated using quoted market prices or discounted cash flow ("DCF") analyses. The fair value of recourse and non-recourse debt excludes accrued interest at the valuation date. The fair value was determined using available market information as of December 31, 2018.2021. The Company is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts subsequent to December 31, 2018.2021.
Nonrecurring measurements For nonrecurring measurements derived using the income approach, fair value is generally determined using valuation models based on the principles of DCF. The income approach is most often used in the impairment evaluation of long-lived tangible assets, equity method investments, goodwill, and intangible assets. Where the use of market observable data is limited or not available for certain input assumptions, the Company develops its own estimates using a variety of techniques such as regression analysis and extrapolations. Depending on the complexity of a valuation, an independent valuation firm may be engaged to assist management in the valuation process.
For nonrecurring measurements derived using the market approach, recent market transactions involving the sale of identical or similar assets are considered. The use of this approach is limited because it is often difficult to


148 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

identify sale transactions of identical or similar assets. This approach is used in impairment evaluations of certain intangible assets. Otherwise, it is used to corroborate the fair value determined under the income approach.
For nonrecurring measurements derived using the cost approach, fair value is typically based upon a replacement cost approach. This approach involves a considerable amount of judgment, which is why its use is limited to the measurement of long-lived tangible assets. Like the market approach, this approach is also used to corroborate the fair value determined under the income approach.
Fair Value Considerations — In determining fair value, the Company considers the source of observable market data inputs, liquidity of the instrument, the credit risk of the counterparty, and the risk of the Company's or its counterparty's nonperformance. The conditions and criteria used to assess these factors are:
Sources of market assumptions — The Company derives most of its market assumptions from market efficient data sources (e.g., Bloomberg and Reuters). To determine fair value where market data is not readily available, management uses comparable market sources and empirical evidence to develop its own estimates of market assumptions.
Market liquidity — The Company evaluates market liquidity based on whether the financial or physical instrument, or the underlying asset, is traded in an active or inactive market. An active market exists if the prices are fully transparent to market participants, can be measured by market bid and ask quotes, the market has a relatively large proportion of trading volume as compared to the Company's current trading volume, and the market has a significant number of market participants that will allow the market to rapidly absorb the quantity of assets traded without significantly affecting the market price. Another factor the Company considers when determining whether a market is active or inactive is the presence of government or regulatory controls over pricing that could make it difficult to establish a market-based price when entering into a transaction.
Nonperformance risk — Nonperformance risk refers to the risk that an obligation will not be fulfilled and affects the value at which a liability is transferred or an asset is sold. Nonperformance risk includes, but may not be limited to, the CompanyCompany's or its counterparty's credit and settlement risk. Nonperformance risk adjustments are dependent on credit spreads, letters of credit, collateral, other arrangements available, and the nature of master netting arrangements. The Company is party to various interest rate swaps and options;options, foreign currency options and forwards;forwards, and derivatives and embedded derivatives, which subject the Company to nonperformance risk. The financial and physical instruments held at the subsidiary level are generally non-recourse to the Parent Company.
Nonperformance risk on the investments held by the Company is incorporated in the fair value derived from quoted market data to mark the investments to fair value.
Recurring Measurements — The following table presents, by level within the fair value hierarchy as described in Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company's financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated (in millions). For the Company's investments in marketable debt and equity securities, the security classes presented were determined based on the nature and risk of the security and are consistent with how the Company manages, monitors, and measures its marketable securities:

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

  December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets                
DEBT SECURITIES:                
Available-for-sale:                
Unsecured debentures $
 $5
 $
 $5
 $
 $207
 $
 $207
Certificates of deposit 
 243
 
 243
 
 153
 
 153
Total debt securities 
 248
 
 248
 
 360
 
 360
EQUITY SECURITIES:                
Mutual funds 19
 49
 
 68
 20
 52
 
 72
Total equity securities 19
 49
 
 68
 20
 52
 
 72
DERIVATIVES:                
Interest rate derivatives 
 28
 1
 29
 
 15
 
 15
Cross-currency derivatives 
 6
 
 6
 
 29
 
 29
Foreign currency derivatives 
 18
 199
 217
 
 29
 240
 269
Commodity derivatives 
 6
 4
 10
 
 30
 5
 35
Total derivatives — assets 
 58
 204
 262
 
 103
 245
 348
TOTAL ASSETS $19
 $355
 $204
 $578
 $20
 $515
 $245
 $780
Liabilities                
DERIVATIVES:                
Interest rate derivatives $
 $67
 $141
 $208
 $
 $111
 $151
 $262
Cross-currency derivatives 
 5
 
 5
 
 3
 
 3
Foreign currency derivatives 
 41
 
 41
 
 30
 
 30
Commodity derivatives 
 3
 
 3
 
 19
 1
 20
Total derivatives — liabilities 
 116
 141
 257
 
 163
 152
 315
TOTAL LIABILITIES $
 $116
 $141
 $257
 $
 $163
 $152
 $315


149 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

 December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
 Level 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets
DEBT SECURITIES:
Available-for-sale:
Unsecured debentures$— $— $— $— $— $21 $— $21 
Certificates of deposit— 199 — 199 — 238 — 238 
Total debt securities— 199 — 199 — 259 — 259 
EQUITY SECURITIES:
Mutual funds31 13 — 44 28 51 — 79 
Total equity securities31 13 — 44 28 51 — 79 
DERIVATIVES:
Interest rate derivatives— 51 53 — 13 — 13 
Cross-currency derivatives— — — — 
Foreign currency derivatives— 29 108 137 — 15 146 161 
Commodity derivatives— 32 38 — 10 
Total derivatives — assets— 117 116 233 — 41 148 189 
TOTAL ASSETS$31 $329 $116 $476 $28 $351 $148 $527 
Liabilities
DERIVATIVES:
Interest rate derivatives$— $286 $$294 $— $374 $236 $610 
Cross-currency derivatives— 11 — 11 — 
Foreign currency derivatives— 35 — 35 — 43 — 43 
Commodity derivatives— 37 44 — 22 — 22 
Total derivatives — liabilities— 369 15 384 — 441 238 679 
TOTAL LIABILITIES$— $369 $15 $384 $— $441 $238 $679 
As of December 31, 2018,2021, all AFSavailable-for-sale debt securities had stated maturities within one year. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021 and 2016,2020, no other-than-temporary impairmentimpairments of marketable securities were recognized in earnings or Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(Loss). Gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined using the specific-identification method. The following table presents gross proceeds from sale of AFSavailable-for-sale securities for the periods indicated (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016
Gross proceeds from sale of AFS securities (1)
 $1,403
 $1,398
 $1,726
_____________________________
(1)
Proceeds include $119 million of non-cash proceeds from non-convertible debentures at Guaimbê Solar Complex. See Note 24—Acquisitions for further information.
Any Level 1 derivative instruments are exchange-traded commodity futures for which the pricing is observable in active markets, and as such, these are not expected to transfer to other levels. There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2.
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Gross proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities$578 $582 $663 
The following tables present a reconciliation of net derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017 presented2020 (presented net by type of derivative.derivative in millions). Transfers between Level 3 and Level 2 are determined as of the end of the reporting period and principally result from changes in the significance of unobservable inputs used to calculate the credit valuation adjustment (in millions).adjustment.
Year Ended December 31, 2021Interest RateCross CurrencyForeign CurrencyCommodityTotal
Balance at January 1$(236)$(2)$146 $$(90)
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in earnings13 (10)(7)(1)(5)
Included in other comprehensive income — derivative activity— (3)(5)(4)
Included in regulatory (assets) liabilities— — — 
Settlements216 (28)(1)190 
Transfers of assets/(liabilities), net into Level 3(3)— — — 
Transfers of (assets)/liabilities, net out of Level 3— — — 
Balance at December 31$(6)$— $108 $(1)$101 
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period$$$(35)$— $(29)


150 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

Year Ended December 31, 2018Interest Rate Foreign Currency Commodity Total
Balance at January 1$(151) $240
 $4
 $93
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):       
Included in earnings22
 (14) (1) 7
Included in other comprehensive income — derivative activity(8) 
 
 (8)
Included in regulatory (assets) liabilities
 
 5
 5
Settlements14
 (27) (4) (17)
Transfers of assets/(liabilities), net into Level 3(8) 
 
 (8)
Transfers of (assets)/liabilities, net out of Level 3(9) 
 
 (9)
Balance at December 31$(140) $199
 $4
 $63
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period$29
 $(41) $(1) $(13)

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Year Ended December 31, 2017Interest Rate Foreign Currency Commodity Total
Balance at January 1$(179) $255
 $5
 $81
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):       
Included in earnings(1) 21
 1
 21
Included in other comprehensive income — derivative activity(23) 
 
 (23)
Included in regulatory (assets) liabilities
 
 10
 10
Settlements36
 (36) (12) (12)
Transfers of assets/(liabilities), net into Level 3(4) 
 
 (4)
Transfers of (assets)/liabilities, net out of Level 320
 
 
 20
Balance at December 31$(151) $240
 $4
 $93
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period$7
 $(15) $1
 $(7)

Year Ended December 31, 2020Interest RateCross CurrencyForeign CurrencyCommodityTotal
Balance at January 1$(184)$(11)$94 $(1)$(102)
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in earnings(2)67 70 
Included in other comprehensive income — derivative activity(84)(10)23 — (71)
Settlements34 21 (39)17 
Transfers of assets/(liabilities), net into Level 3(6)— — — (6)
Transfers of (assets)/liabilities, net out of Level 3— — 
Balance at December 31$(236)$(2)$146 $$(90)
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period$— $(2)$35 $$35 
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used for the Level 3 derivative assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 20182021 (in millions, except range amounts):
Type of Derivative Fair Value Unobservable Input 
Amount or Range
(Weighted Average)
Interest rate $(140) Subsidiaries’ credit spreads 1.8% - 5.3% (3.7%)
Foreign currency:      
Argentine peso 199
 Argentine peso to U.S. dollar currency exchange rate after one year 52.7 - 142.6 (96.1)
Commodity:      
Other 4
    
Total $63
    

Type of DerivativeFair ValueUnobservable Input
Amount or Range
(Weighted Average)
Interest rate$(6)Subsidiaries’ credit spreads0.9% - 3.2% (2.3%)
Foreign currency:
Argentine peso108 Argentine peso to USD currency exchange rate after one year105 - 478 (245)
Commodity:
Other(1)
Total$101 
For interest rate derivatives and foreign currency derivatives, increases (decreases) in the estimates of the Company's own credit spreads would decrease (increase) the value of the derivatives in a liability position. For foreign currency derivatives, increases (decreases) in the estimate of the above exchange rate would increase (decrease) the value of the derivative.
Nonrecurring Measurements
When evaluating impairment of long-lived assets and equity method investments, theThe Company measures fair value using the applicable fair value measurement guidance. Impairment expense is measured by comparing the fair value at the evaluation date to theirthe then-latest available carrying amount. The following table summarizes our major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period and their level within the fair value hierarchy (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2021Measurement Date
Carrying Amount (1)
Fair Value
Pre-tax
Loss
AssetsLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Dispositions: (2)
Estrella del Mar I9/30/2021$17 $— $$— $11 
Alto Maipo (3)
11/30/20212,339 — — 2,043 — 
Long-lived assets held and used: (4)
Puerto Rico3/31/2021548 — — 73 475 
Mountain View I & II4/30/202178 — — 11 67 
Ventanas 3 & 46/30/2021661 — — 12 649 
Angamos6/30/2021241 — — 86 155 
Buffalo Gap III12/31/202191 — — — 91 
Buffalo Gap II12/31/202173 — — — 73 
Buffalo Gap I12/31/202129 — — — 29 
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Measurement Date 
Carrying Amount (1)
 Fair Value 
Pre-tax
Loss
Assets  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Dispositions and held-for-sale businesses:            
Shady Point 12/31/2018 $211
 $
 $
 $30
 $157
Long-lived assets held and used: (2)
            
Nejapa 12/31/2018 42
 
 
 5
 37
Equity method investments:            
Guacolda 10/01/2018 354
 
 
 209
 144
Elsta 09/30/2018 19
 
 16
 
 3
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Measurement Date 
Carrying Amount (1)
 Fair Value 
Pre-tax
Loss
Assets  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Long-lived assets held and used: (2)
            
Laurel Mountain 12/31/2017 $154
 $
 $
 $33
 $121
Kilroot 12/31/2017 69
 
 
 20
 37
DPL 02/28/2017 77
 
 
 11
 66
Other Various 18
 
 
 
 18
Dispositions and held-for-sale businesses:            
DPL Peaker Assets 12/31/2017 346
 
 237
 
 109
Kazakhstan Hydroelectric (3)
 06/30/2017 190
 
 92
 
 92
Kazakhstan CHPs 03/31/2017 171
 
 29
 
 94
Year Ended December 31, 2020Measurement Date
Carrying Amount (1)
Fair Value
Pre-tax
Loss
AssetsLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Long-lived assets held and used: (4)
Angamos8/1/2020$870 $— $— $306 $564 
Ventanas 1 & 28/1/2020213 — — — 213 
Hawaii8/31/2020114 — — 76 38 
Estrella del Mar I9/30/202044 — — 14 30 
Equity method investments:
OPGC (5)
3/31/2020195 — — 152 43 
OPGC (5)
6/30/2020272 — 104 — 158 
_____________________________
(1)Represents the carrying values at the dates of initial measurement, before fair value adjustment.
(2)See Note 24Held-for-Sale and Dispositionsfor further information.
(3)Fair value measurement performed for purposes of allocating $224 million of goodwill to the carrying amount of Alto Maipo in determining the loss on disposal. The goodwill allocation was determined based on the relative fair value of Alto Maipo, which was included in the AES Andes reporting unit. Note that the Pre-


(1)
Represents the carrying values at the dates of initial measurement, before fair value adjustment.151 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
(2)

tax Loss column excludes the loss on disposal as this fair value measurement is only one component of such loss. See Note 24Held-for-Sale and Dispositionsfor further information.
(4)See Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense
See Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
(5)See Note 8—Investments In and Advances to Affiliatesfor further information.
(3)
Per the Company's policy, pre-tax loss is limited to the impairment of long-lived assets. Any additional loss will be recognized on completion of the sale. Upon disposal of Kazakhstan HPPs, the Company incurred an additional pre-tax loss on disposal of $33 million. See Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense and Note 23—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used in the Level 3 measurement of long-lived assets held and used measured on a nonrecurring basis during the year ended December 31, 20182021 (in millions, except range amounts):
December 31, 2018 Fair Value Valuation Technique Unobservable Input Range (Weighted Average)
Long-lived assets held and used:        
Nejapa 5
 Discounted cash flow Annual revenue growth -70% to -1% (-15%)
      Pre-tax operating margin 37% to 82% (59%)
      Weighted-average cost of capital 12%
Equity method invesments:        
Guacolda 209
 Discounted cash flow Annual dividend growth -70% to 467% (48%)
      Weighted-average cost of equity 10%
Total $214
      

When determining the fair value of the Shady Point held-for-sale asset group, the Company used the market approach based on prices and unobservable inputs from transactions involving comparable assets as the inputs for the Level 3 nonrecurring measurement.
December 31, 2021Fair ValueValuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRange (Weighted Average)
Long-lived assets held and used:
Puerto Rico$73 Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(80)% to 8% (—%)
Annual variable margin37% to 97% (—%)
Weighted-average cost of capital18% to —%
Mountain View I & II11 Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(69)% to 54% (—%)
Annual variable margin(10)% to 56% (46%)
Weighted-average cost of capital8%
Ventanas 3 & 412 Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(18)% to 23% (2%)
Annual variable margin(5)% to 21% (6%)
Weighted-average cost of capital11%
Angamos86 Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(8)% to 58% (8%)
Annual variable margin(8)% to 53% (11%)
Weighted-average cost of capital11%
Buffalo Gap III— Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(12)% to 6% (—%)
Pre-tax operating margin(18)% to 29% (2%)
Weighted-average cost of capital11%
Buffalo Gap II— Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(10)% to 6% (—%)
Pre-tax operating margin(26)% to 39% (-11%)
Weighted-average cost of capital11%
Buffalo Gap I— Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(12)% to 6% (-1%)
Pre-tax operating margin(45)% to 45% (-37%)
Weighted-average cost of capital11%
Alto Maipo2,043 Discounted cash flowAnnual revenue growth(14)% to 14% (2%)
Pre-tax operating margin(18)% to 8% (2%)
Weighted-average cost of capital7%
Total$2,225 
Financial Instruments not Measured at Fair Value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
The following table presents (in millions) the carrying amount, fair value, and fair value hierarchy of the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the periods indicated, but for which fair value is disclosed (in millions).disclosed:
December 31, 2021
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets:
Accounts receivable — noncurrent (1)
$55 $117 $— $— $117 
Liabilities:Non-recourse debt14,811 16,091 — 16,065 26 
Recourse debt3,754 3,818 — 3,818 — 
   December 31, 2018
   
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
   Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:
Accounts receivable — noncurrent (1)
 $100
 $209
 $
 $
 $209
Liabilities:Non-recourse debt 15,645
 16,225
 
 13,524
 2,701
 Recourse debt 3,655
 3,621
 
 3,621
 
 December 31, 2017December 31, 2020
 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets:
Accounts receivable — noncurrent (1)
 $163
 $217
 $
 $6
 $211
Assets:
Accounts receivable — noncurrent (1)
$97 $197 $— $— $197 
Liabilities:Non-recourse debt 15,340
 15,890
 
 13,350
 2,540
Liabilities:Non-recourse debt16,354 18,403 15,301 3,097 
Recourse debt 4,630
 4,920
 
 4,920
 
Recourse debt3,446 3,677 — 3,677 — 
_____________________________
(1)These amounts primarily relate to amounts due from CAMMESA, the administrator of the wholesale electricity market in Argentina, and amounts related to green blend agreements in Chile and are included in Other noncurrent assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value and carrying amount of the Argentina receivables exclude VAT of $2 million and $4 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. See Note 7—Financing Receivables for further information.


(1)
These amounts primarily relate152 | Notes to amounts due from CAMMESA, the administrator of the wholesale electricity market in Argentina, and are included in Other noncurrent assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value and carrying amount of these receivables exclude VAT of $16 million and $31 million as ofFinancial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 20182021, 2020 and 2017, respectively.
2019
5.
6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Volume of Activity — The following table presents the Company's maximum notional (in millions) over the remaining contractual period by type of derivative as of December 31, 2018,2021, regardless of whether they are in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, and the dates through which the maturities for each type of derivative range:
Derivatives Maximum Notional Translated to USD Latest Maturity
Interest Rate (LIBOR and EURIBOR) $4,584
 2044
Cross-currency Swaps (Chilean Unidad de Fomento and Chilean peso) 344
 2029
Foreign Currency:    
Argentine peso 68
 2026
Chilean peso 270
 2021
Colombian peso 117
 2021
Brazilian real 23
 2019
Others, primarily with weighted average remaining maturities of a year or less 112
 2021

Interest Rate and Foreign Currency DerivativesMaximum Notional Translated to USDLatest Maturity
Interest rate (LIBOR and EURIBOR)$5,014 2059
Cross-currency swaps (Brazilian Reais)254 2026
Foreign currency:
Argentine peso12 2026
Chilean peso366 2024
Colombian peso121 2023
Euro87 2023
Brazilian real2022

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Commodity DerivativesMaximum NotionalLatest Maturity
Natural Gas (in MMBtu)93 2029
Power (in MWhs)18 2043
Coal (in Tons or Metric Tonnes)2027
Accounting and ReportingAssets and Liabilities — The following tables present the fair value of assets and liabilities related to the Company's derivative instruments as of the periods indicated (in millions):
Fair ValueDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
AssetsDesignatedNot DesignatedTotalDesignatedNot DesignatedTotal
Interest rate derivatives$53 $— $53 $13 $— $13 
Cross-currency derivatives— — 
Foreign currency derivatives28 109 137 40 121 161 
Commodity derivatives32 38 10 
Total assets$92 $141 $233 $60 $129 $189 
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives$288 $$294 $506 $104 $610 
Cross-currency derivatives11 — 11 — 
Foreign currency derivatives23 12 35 35 43 
Commodity derivatives11 33 44 — 22 22 
Total liabilities$333 $51 $384 $518 $161 $679 
Fair Value December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Assets Designated Not Designated Total Designated Not Designated Total
Interest rate derivatives $29
 $
 $29
 $15
 $
 $15
Cross-currency derivatives 6
 
 6
 29
 
 29
Foreign currency derivatives 
 217
 217
 8
 261
 269
Commodity derivatives 
 10
 10
 5
 30
 35
Total assets $35
 $227
 $262
 $57
 $291
 $348
Liabilities            
Interest rate derivatives $205
 $3
 $208
 $125
 $137
 $262
Cross-currency derivatives 5
 
 5
 3
 
 3
Foreign currency derivatives 28
 13
 41
 1
 29
 30
Commodity derivatives 
 3
 3
 9
 11
 20
Total liabilities $238
 $19
 $257
 $138
 $177
 $315

December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Fair ValueAssetsLiabilitiesAssetsLiabilities
Current$85 $83 $51 $236 
Noncurrent148 301 138 443 
Total$233 $384 $189 $679 
  December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Fair Value Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Current $75
 $51
 $84
 $211
Noncurrent 187
 206
 264
 104
Total $262
 $257
 $348
 $315

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features (1)
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Present value of liabilities subject to collateralization$— $
Cash collateral held by third parties or in escrow— 
_____________________________
(1)     Based on the credit rating of certain subsidiaries
As of December 31, 2018,2021, all derivative instruments subject to credit risk-related contingent features were in an asset position.


Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features (1)
       December 31, 2017
Present value of liabilities subject to collateralization       $15
Cash collateral held by third parties or in escrow       9
_____________________________
(1)
Based on the credit rating of certain subsidiaries153 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) — The following table presents the pre-tax gains (losses) recognized in AOCL and earnings related to all derivative instruments for the periods indicated (in millions):
  Years Ended December 31,
2018 2017 2016
Effective portion of cash flow hedges      
Gains (losses) recognized in AOCL      
Interest rate derivatives $(16) $(66) $(35)
Cross-currency derivatives (26) 31
 21
Foreign currency derivatives (52) (5) (4)
Commodity derivatives 
 18
 30
Total $(94) $(22) $12
Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCL to earnings      
Interest rate derivatives $(52) $(82) $(101)
Cross-currency derivatives (43) 34
 8
Foreign currency derivatives (16) (20) (8)
Commodity derivatives (6) 17
 56
Total $(117) $(51) $(45)
Loss reclassified from AOCL to earnings due to discontinuance of hedge accounting (1)
 $
 $(13) $
Gain (losses) recognized in earnings related to      
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges $(7) $3
 $(1)
Not designated as hedging instruments:      
Foreign currency derivatives 148
 1
 19
Commodity derivatives and other 25
 14
 (16)
Total $173
 $15
 $3

Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Cash flow hedges
Gains (losses) recognized in AOCL
Interest rate derivatives$51 $(511)$(290)
Cross-currency derivatives(11)(26)
Foreign currency derivatives(34)25 (23)
Commodity derivatives(1)— 
Total$$(478)$(339)
Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCL to earnings
Interest rate derivatives$(419)$(75)$(28)
Cross-currency derivatives(15)(5)(12)
Foreign currency derivatives(62)(9)(13)
Commodity derivatives(2)(1)
Total$(492)$(91)$(54)
Loss reclassified from AOCL to earnings due to discontinuance of hedge accounting (1)
$— $— $(2)
Gain (losses) recognized in earnings related to
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate derivatives$105 $(1)$— 
Foreign currency derivatives29 68 (46)
Commodity derivatives and other(28)(68)(6)
Total$106 $(1)$(52)
_____________________________
(1)     Cash flow hedge was discontinued on a cross-currency swap in 2019 because the underlying debt was prepaid.
Cash flow hedge was discontinued because it was probable the forecasted transaction will not occur.
AOCL is expected to decrease pre-tax income from continuing operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 20192022 by $59$100 million, primarily due to interest rate derivatives.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

6.7. FINANCING RECEIVABLES
Receivables with contractual maturities of greater than one year are considered financing receivables, primarily related to amended agreements or government resolutions due from CAMMESA.receivables. The following table presents financing receivables by country as of the dates indicated (in millions):. As the Company applied the modified retrospective method of adoption for ASC 326 effective January 1, 2020, CECL reserves are included in the receivable balance as of December 31, 2021. See Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further information.
December 31, 2018 2017
Argentina $93
 $177
Panama 14
 
Other 9
 17
Total $116
 $194

December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Gross ReceivableAllowanceNet ReceivableGross ReceivableAllowanceNet Receivable
Argentina$11 $$10 $48 $$39 
Chile17 — 17 31 — 31 
Other30 — 30 31 — 31 
Total$58 $$57 $110 $$101 
Argentina
Collection of the principal and interest on these receivables is subject to various business risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the continued operation of power plants which generate cash for payments of these receivables, regulatory changes that could impact the timing and amount of collections, and economic conditions in Argentina. The Company monitors these risks, including the credit ratings of the Argentine government, on a quarterly basis to assess the collectability of these receivables. The Company accrues interest on these receivables if collectability is reasonably assured.once the recognition criteria have been met. The Company's collection estimates are based on assumptions that it believes to be reasonable, but are inherently uncertain. Actual future cash flows could differ from these estimates. The decrease in Argentina financing receivables was primarily due to planned collections and unfavorable FX impacts.
FONINVEMEM Agreements — As a result of energy market reforms in 2004 and 2010, AES Argentina entered into three3 agreements with the Argentine government, referred to as the FONINVEMEM Agreements, to contribute a portion of their accounts receivable into a fund for financing the construction of combined cycle and gas-fired plants. These receivables accrue interest and are collected in monthly installments over 10 years once the related plant begins operations. In addition, AES Argentina receives an ownership interest in these newly built plants once the receivables have been fully repaid.


154 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

The FONINVEMEM receivables are denominated in Argentine pesos, but indexed to U.S. dollars,USD, which represents a foreign currency derivative. Due to differences between spot rates, used to remeasure the receivables, and discounted forward rates, used to value the foreign currency derivative, these two items will not perfectly offset over the life of the receivable. Once settled, the foreign currency derivative will offset the accumulated unrealized foreign currency losses resulting from the devaluation of the FONINVEMEM receivable. As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the amount of the foreign currency-related derivative assets associated with the FONINVEMEM financing receivables that were excluded from the table above had a fair value of $199$108 million and $240$146 million, respectively.
The receivables under the FONINVEMEM Agreements have been actively collected since the related plants commenced operations in 2010 and 2016. In assessing the collectability of the receivables under these agreements, the Company also considers historic collection evidence in accordance with the agreements.
Other Agreements Other agreements primarily consist of resolutions passed by the Argentine government in which AES Argentina will receive compensation for investments in new generation plants and technologies. The timing of collections depend on corresponding agreements and collectability of these receivables are assessed on an ongoing basis.
Chile

AES Andes has recorded receivables pertaining to revenues recognized on regulated energy contracts that were impacted by the Stabilization Fund created by the Chilean government in October 2019, in conjunction with the Tariff Stabilization Law. Historically, the government updated the prices for these contracts every six months to reflect the indexation the contracts have to exchange rates and commodities prices. The Stabilization Fund does not allow the pass-through of these contractual indexation updates to customers beyond the pricing in effect at July 1, 2019, until new lower-cost renewable contracts are incorporated into pricing in 2023. Consequently, costs incurred in excess of the July 1, 2019 price will be accumulated and borne by generators.
THEOn December 31, 2020, AES CORPORATIONAndes executed an agreement for the sale of receivables generated pursuant the Tariff Stabilization Law. As a result of the agreement, as of December 31, 2021, $34 million of current receivables and $9 million of noncurrent receivables were recorded in Accounts receivable and Other noncurrent assets, respectively, pertaining to the Stabilization Fund. Additionally, $8 million of payment deferrals granted to mining customers as part of our green blend agreements were recorded as financing receivables included in Other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2021.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

7.8. INVESTMENTS IN AND ADVANCES TO AFFILIATES
The following table summarizes the relevant effective equity ownership interest and carrying values for the Company's investments accounted for under the equity method as of the periods indicated:
December 31,2021202020212020
AffiliateCountryCarrying Value (in millions)Ownership Interest %
sPower (1)
United States$492 $551 50 %50 %
Fluence (2)
United States304 — 34 %50 %
UplightUnited States103 85 29 %32 %
Energía Natural Dominicana Enadom (3)
Dominican Republic53 49 43 %43 %
Mesa La PazMexico48 60 50 %50 %
Grupo Energía Gas PanamáPanama41 — 49 %— %
Barry (4)
United Kingdom— — 100 %100 %
Other affiliates (5)
Various39 90 
Total$1,080 $835 
December 31,  2018 2017 2018 2017
AffiliateCountry Carrying Value (in millions) Ownership Interest %
sPowerUnited States $515
 $508
 50% 50%
OPGC (1)
India 293
 269
 49% 49%
Guacolda (2)
Chile 209
 357
 33% 33%
Other affiliates (3)
Various 97
 63
    
Total  $1,114
 $1,197
    
_____________________________
(1)In January 2021, the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms were merged to form AES Clean Energy Development. See Note 25—Acquisitions for further information.
(2)During 2020, Fluence incurred losses resulting in a negative Investments in and advances to affiliates balance for the Company. As we had guaranteed obligations of Fluence, equity method accounting was not suspended and the negative carrying value of $12 million was recorded to Other noncurrent liabilities. Subsequent to Fluence's IPO in November 2021, AES recognized a gain upon dilution of its interest in Fluence which is now included in our Investments in and advances to affiliates balance.
(3)The Company's ownership in Energía Natural Dominicana Enadom is held through Andres, an 85%-owned consolidated subsidiary. Andres owns 50% of Energía Natural Dominicana Enadom, resulting in an AES effective ownership of 43%.
(4)Represents a VIE in which the Company holds a variable interest, but is not the primary beneficiary.
(5)Includes Bosforo and Tucano equity method investments, and others. During 2020, a $67 million loan facility was granted from Colon to Gas Natural Atlántico II that was eliminated due to consolidation in 2021.
Gas Natural Atlántico II — In September 2021, the Company acquired the remaining equity interest in Gas Natural Atlántico II, S. de. R.L., a partnership whose purpose is to construct transmission lines for Colon. After


_____________________________
(1)
OPGC has one coal-fired project under development which is an expansion of our existing OPGC business. The project started construction in April 2014155 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and is expected to begin operations in 2019.2019
(2)

additional assets were acquired, the Company remeasured the investment at the acquisition-date fair value, resulting in the recognition of a $6 million gain, recorded in Other income. The partnership, previously recorded as an equity method investment, is now consolidated by AES and is reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Uplight — In July 2021, the Company closed on a transaction involving existing and new shareholders of Uplight. As part of the transaction, the Company contributed $37 million to Uplight; however, AES’s ownership interest in Uplight decreased from 32.3% to 29.6% primarily due to larger contributions from other investors. The transaction was accounted for as a partial disposition in which AES recognized a loss of $25 million in Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests, mainly as a result of the settlement of share based awards at Uplight as well as the expenses associated with the transaction.
In October 2021, the Company contributed an additional $23 million to Uplight. AES' ownership interest decreased to 29.4% as a result of equity granted to retained executives at a company acquired by Uplight. As the Company still does not control Uplight after the transaction, it continues to be accounted for as an equity method investment and is reported as part of Corporate and Other.
Fluence — In June 2021, Fluence issued new shares to the Qatar Investment Authority (“QIA”) for $125 million, which following the completion of the transaction, represented a 13.6% ownership interest in Fluence. As a result of the transaction, which AES has accounted for as a partial disposition, AES’ ownership interest in Fluence decreased from 50% to 43.2% and the Company recognized a gain of $60 million in Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests.
On November 1, 2021, Fluence completed its IPO of 35,650,000 of its Class A common stock at a price of $28 per share, including the exercise of the underwriters’ option. Fluence received approximately $936 million in proceeds, after expenses, as a result of the transaction. AES’ ownership interest in Fluence decreased to 34.2%. The Company recognized a gain of $325 million in Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests. As the Company still does not control Fluence after the transaction, it continues to be accounted for as an equity method investment and is reported as part of Corporate and Other.
Grupo Energía Gas Panamá — In April 2021, Grupo Energía Gas Panamá, a joint venture between AES and InterEnergy Power & Gas Limited, completed the acquisition of a combined cycle natural gas development project. AES holds a 49% ownership interest in the affiliate and as of December 31, 2021, the Company contributed $44 million to the joint venture. As the Company does not control the joint venture, it is accounted for as an equity method investment and is reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
sPower — In February 2021, the Company substantially completed the merger of the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms to form AES Clean Energy Development, a consolidated entity, which will serve as the development vehicle for all future renewable projects in the U.S. Since the sPower development platform was carved-out of AES’ existing equity method investment, this transaction resulted in a $102 million decrease in the carrying value of the sPower investment and the Company recognized a gain of $214 million in Other income.
In December 2021, AES acquired an additional 25% ownership in specifically identified projects of the sPower development platform. As a result, the Company recognized a gain of $35 million in Other income. Subsequent to the transaction, AES has a 75% ownership interest in specifically identified projects of sPower through its ownership of AES Clean Energy Development, and 50% ownership interest in the sPower equity method investment. See Note 25Acquisitions for further information. As the Company still does not control sPower after the transaction, it continues to be accounted for as an equity method investment and is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
The Company's ownership in Guacolda is held through AES Gener, a 67%-owned consolidated subsidiary. AES Gener owns 50% of Guacolda, resulting in an AES effective ownership in Guacolda of 33%.
(3)
Includes Fluence, Simple Energy, Bosforo, Elsta, Distributed Energy equity method investments, and others.
Guacolda — In October 2018,September 2020, Guacolda management reviewed the recoverability of the Guacolda asset group and determined the undiscounted cash flows did not exceed the carrying amount. Impairment indicators were identified primarily as a result of inability to re-contract Guacolda’s generation after expiration of its existing PPAs driven by lower energy prices in Chile and reduced forecasted cash flows resulting from decarbonization initiatives of the Chilean Government. Guacolda recognized a long-lived asset impairment at the investee level, which negatively impacted the Company's Net equity in losses of affiliates by $127 million. As a result, the Company’s basis in its investment in Guacolda was reduced to zero and the equity method of accounting was suspended.


156 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

In February 2021, AES Andes entered into an agreement to sell its 50% ownership interest in Guacolda for $34 million. On July 20, 2021, the Company completed the sale, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of $34 million, recorded in Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests. Prior to its sale, the Guacolda equity method investment was reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
OPGC — In March 2020, an other-than-temporary impairment was identified at GuacoldaOPGC primarily as a resultdue to the estimated market value of increased renewable generation in Chile lowering energy prices, impacting management's ability to re-contract Guacolda's generation after expiration of existing PPAs.the Company's investment and the economic slowdown. A calculation of the fair value of Gener'sthe Company’s investment in GuacoldaOPGC was required to evaluate whether there was a loss in the carrying value of the investment. Based on management'smanagement’s estimate of fair value of $209$152 million, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment of $144$43 million.
In June 2020, the Company agreed to sell its entire 49% stake in OPGC resulting in an additional other-than-temporary impairment of $158 million. Total other-than-temporary impairment for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $201 million recognized in Other non-operating expense. The GuacoldaIn December 2020, the Company completed the sale of its interest in OPGC. Prior to its sale, the OPGC equity method investment iswas reported in the South AmericaEurasia SBU reportable segment.
Distributed Energy — In December 2018, Distributed Energy acquired the remaining equity interest in a partnership holding various solar projects for consideration of $23 million. This transaction resulted in a loss of $5 million, reported in Other expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The projects, previously recorded as equity method investments, have been consolidated. See Note 24—Acquisitions for further discussion.
Simple Energy — In April 2018, the Company invested $35 million in Simple Energy, a provider of utility-branded marketplaces and omni-channel instant rebates. As the Company does not control Simple Energy, the investment is accounted for as an equity method investment and is reported as part of Corporate and Other.
Fluence — On January 1, 2018, Siemens and AES closed on the creation of the Fluence joint venture with each party holding a 50% ownership interest. The Company contributed $7 million in cash and $20 million in non-cash assets from the AES Advancion energy storage development business as consideration for the transaction, and received an equity interest in Fluence with a fair value of $50 million. See Note 23—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further discussion. Fluence is a global energy storage technology and services company. As the Company does not control Fluence, the investment is accounted for as an equity method investment. The Fluence equity method investment is reported as part of Corporate and Other.
sPower — In February 2017, the Company and Alberta Investment Management Corporation (“AIMCo”) entered into an agreement to acquire FTP Power LLC (“sPower”). In July 2017, AES closed on the acquisition of its 48% ownership interest in sPower for $461 million. In November 2017, AES acquired an additional 2% ownership interest in sPower for $19 million. As the Company does not control sPower, it is accounted for as an equity method investment. The sPower portfolio includes solar and wind projects in operation, under construction, and in development located in the United States. The sPower equity method investment is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

AES Barry Ltd. — The Company holds a 100% ownership interest in AES Barry Ltd. ("Barry"), a dormant entity in the U.K. that disposed of its generation and other operating assets. Due to a debt agreement, no material financial or operating decisions can be made without the banks' consent, and the Company does not control Barry. As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, other long-term liabilities included $43$44 million and $45$46 million related to this debt agreement.
Summarized Financial Information — The following tables summarize financial information of the Company's 50%-or-less-owned affiliates and majority-owned unconsolidated subsidiaries that are accounted for using the equity method (in millions):
 
50%-or-less Owned Affiliates (1)
Majority-Owned Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31,202120202019202120202019
Revenue$1,316 $1,880 $1,122 $$$49 
Operating margin (loss)(53)213 124 (1)(3)(5)
Net income (loss)(242)(538)(724)(3)(4)(7)
December 31,20212020 20212020 
Current assets$1,180 $1,017 $868 $159 
Noncurrent assets6,497 6,230 25 886 
Current liabilities1,414 1,294 859 121 
Noncurrent liabilities3,602 3,671 60 981 
Noncontrolling interests— — — 
Stockholders' equity2,660 2,282 (26)(57)
 50%-or-less Owned Affiliates Majority-Owned Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31,2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
Revenue$962
 $762
 $586
 $40
 $16
 $23
Operating margin135
 165
 145
 3
 5
 9
Net income (loss)14
 72
 64
 (3) (15) (2)
            
December 31,2018 2017   2018 2017  
Current assets$558
 $418
   $89
 $70
  
Noncurrent assets5,918
 5,372
   41
 102
  
Current liabilities546
 633
   35
 10
  
Noncurrent liabilities3,309
 2,629
   122
 147
  
Stockholders' equity2,622
 2,527
   (27) 15
  
_____________________________
(1)As of July 1, 2021, AES began to account for its investment in Fluence quarterly, on a three-month lag. This shift in timing is necessary due to the nature of the entity subsequent to its IPO.
At December 31, 2018,2021, retained earnings included $236$169 million related to the undistributed earningslosses of the Company's 50%-or-less owned affiliates. Distributions received from these affiliates were $42$25 million, $69$14 million, and $24$23 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the underlying equity in the net assets of our equity affiliates exceeded the aggregate carrying amount of our investments in equity affiliates by $49$37 million.

8.

157 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

9. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill — The following table summarizes the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 (in millions):
US and UtilitiesSouth AmericaMCACEurasiaCorporate and OtherTotal
Balance as of December 31, 2020
Goodwill$2,788 $868 $16 $— $— $3,672 
Accumulated impairment losses(2,611)— — — — (2,611)
Net balance177 868 16 — — 1,061 
Goodwill acquired during the year(1)
339 — — — 340 
Goodwill derecognized during the year (2)
— (224)— — — (224)
Balance as of December 31, 2021
Goodwill3,127 644 16 — 3,788 
Accumulated impairment losses(2,611)— — — — (2,611)
Net balance$516 $644 $16 $— $$1,177 
_____________________________
 US and Utilities South America MCAC Eurasia Total
Balance as of December 31, 2017         
Goodwill$2,786
 $868
 $16
 $122
 $3,792
Accumulated impairment losses(2,611) 
 
 (122) (2,733)
Net balance175
 868
 16
 
 1,059
Balance as of December 31, 2018         
Goodwill2,786
 868
 16
 122
 3,792
Accumulated impairment losses(2,611) 
 
 (122) (2,733)
Net balance$175
 $868
 $16
 $
 $1,059
(1)See Note 25—Acquisitions for further information.
(2)See Note 24Held-for-Sale and Dispositionsfor further information.

Other Intangible Assets — The following table summarizes the balances comprising Other intangible assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions) as of the periods indicated:
December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Gross Balance Accumulated Amortization Net Balance Gross Balance Accumulated Amortization Net BalanceGross BalanceAccumulated AmortizationNet BalanceGross BalanceAccumulated AmortizationNet Balance
Subject to Amortization    

      Subject to Amortization
Internal-use software$467
 $(344) $123
 $416
 $(330) $86
Internal-use software$457 $(279)$178 $386 $(255)$131 
Contracts137
 (24) 113
 92
 (21) 71
Contracts183 (48)135 157 (38)119 
Project development rights93
 (1) 92
 57
 (1) 56
Contractual payment rights (1)
57
 (44) 13
 65
 (47) 18
Project development rights (1)
Project development rights (1)
819 (8)811 203 (5)198 
Emissions allowances (2)
15
 
 15
 
 
 
Emissions allowances (2)
18 — 18 64 — 64 
Concession rightsConcession rights195 (33)162 201 (18)183 
Other (3)
78
 (44) 34
 98
 (42) 56
Other (3)
111 (17)94 59 (14)45 
Subtotal847
 (457) 390
 728
 (441) 287
Subtotal1,783 (385)1,398 1,070 (330)740 
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets           Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Land use rights21
 
 21
 45
 
 45
Land use rights28 — 28 39 — 39 
Water rights20
 
 20
 20
 
 20
Water rights— 20 — 20 
Transmission rightsTransmission rights19 — 19 22 — 22 
Other5
 
 5
 14
 
 14
Other— — 
Subtotal46
 
 46
 79
 
 79
Subtotal52 — 52 87 — 87 
Total$893
 $(457) $436
 $807
 $(441) $366
Total$1,835 $(385)$1,450 $1,157 $(330)$827 
_____________________________

(1)Includes emission offset fee to the Air Quality Management District ("AQMD") in order to transfer emission offsets from retired legacy Southland units to the new CCGT.
THE AES CORPORATION(2)Acquired or purchased emissions allowances are finite-lived intangible assets that are expensed when utilized and included in net income for the year.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

(1)(3)Includes management rights, renewable energy credits and incentives, and other individually insignificant intangible assets.
Represent legal rights to receive system reliability payments from the regulator.
(2)
Acquired or purchased emissions allowances are finite-lived intangible assets that are expensed when utilized and included in net income for the year.
(3)
Includes management rights, sales concessions, renewable energy credits and incentives, and other individually insignificant intangible assets. During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company recognized an asset impairment of $23 million on gas extraction rights at Nejapa. See Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
The following tables summarize other intangible assets acquired during the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2021AmountSubject to Amortization/Indefinite-LivedWeighted Average Amortization Period (in years)Amortization Method
Internal-use software$89 Subject to Amortization6Straight-line
Contracts35 Subject to Amortization12Straight-line
Project development rights667 Subject to Amortization35Straight-line
Emissions allowances22 Subject to AmortizationVariousAs utilized
Transmission rights— Indefinite-LivedN/AN/A
Concession rights (1)
Subject to Amortization12Straight-line
OtherVariousN/AN/A
Total$822 


158 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

December 31, 2018Amount Subject to Amortization/Indefinite-Lived Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) Amortization Method
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020AmountSubject to Amortization/Indefinite-LivedWeighted Average Amortization Period (in years)
Amortization
Method
Internal-use software$67
 Subject to Amortization 6 Straight-lineInternal-use software$35 Subject to Amortization4Straight-line
Contracts50
 Subject to Amortization 24 Straight-lineContracts28 Subject to Amortization20Straight-line
Project development rights35
 Subject to Amortization 23 Straight-lineProject development rights109 Subject to Amortization30Straight-line
Emissions allowances16
 Subject to Amortization Various As utilizedEmissions allowances56 Subject to AmortizationVariousAs utilized
Transmission rightsTransmission rights20 Indefinite-LivedN/AN/A
Concession rights (1)
Concession rights (1)
184 Subject to Amortization12Straight-line
Other11
 Various N/A N/AOther22 VariousN/AN/A
Total$179
 Total$454 
_____________________________
December 31, 2017Amount Subject to Amortization/Indefinite-Lived Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) 
Amortization
Method
Project Development Rights$53
 Subject to Amortization 30 Straight-line
Contracts34
 Subject to Amortization 25 Straight-line
Internal-use software17
 Subject to Amortization 7 Straight-line
Other8
 Various N/A N/A
Total$112
      

(1)
Represents the fair value assigned to the extension of the Tietê hydroelectric plants' concession agreement with ANEEL. See Note 13—Contingencies for further information.
The following table summarizes the estimated amortization expense by intangible asset category for 20192022 through 2023:2026:
(in millions)2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Internal-use software$33
 $28
 $19
 $13
 $7
Contracts4
 4
 4
 4
 4
Other8
 8
 6
 6
 6
Total$45
 $40
 $29
 $23
 $17

(in millions)20222023202420252026
Internal-use software$32 $28 $27 $25 $24 
Contracts10 10 
Concession rights16 17 16 16 16 
Other
Total$64 $62 $57 $55 $54 
Intangible asset amortization expense was $47$69 million, $34$54 million and $37$45 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

9.10. REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Company has recorded regulatory assets and liabilities (in millions) that it expects to pass through to its customers in accordance with, and subject to, regulatory provisions as follows:
December 31,2018 2017 Recovery/Refund PeriodDecember 31,20212020Recovery/Refund Period
REGULATORY ASSETS  
Regulatory assetsRegulatory assets
Current regulatory assets:    Current regulatory assets:
El Salvador energy pass through costs recovery$87
 $59
 QuarterlyEl Salvador energy pass through costs recovery$80 $40 Quarterly
Other69
 60
 VariousOther88 73 1 year
Total current regulatory assets156
 119
 Total current regulatory assets168 113 
Noncurrent regulatory assets:    Noncurrent regulatory assets:
IPL and DPL defined benefit pension obligations (1)
283
 298
 Various
IPL deferred Midwest ISO costs88
 102
 8 years
IPL environmental costs89
 48
 Various
AES Indiana and AES Ohio defined benefit pension obligations (1)
AES Indiana and AES Ohio defined benefit pension obligations (1)
191 244 Various
AES Indiana deferred fuel and purchased power costsAES Indiana deferred fuel and purchased power costs84 — To be determined
AES Indiana environmental costsAES Indiana environmental costs76 81 Various
AES Indiana Petersburg Units 1 and 2 retirement costsAES Indiana Petersburg Units 1 and 2 retirement costs300 75 Over life of assets
AES Indiana deferred Midwest ISO costsAES Indiana deferred Midwest ISO costs48 61 5 years
Other87
 94
 VariousOther135 126 Various
Total noncurrent regulatory assets547
 542
 Total noncurrent regulatory assets834 587 
TOTAL REGULATORY ASSETS$703
 $661
 
REGULATORY LIABILITIES    
Total regulatory assetsTotal regulatory assets$1,002 $700 
Regulatory liabilitiesRegulatory liabilities
Current regulatory liabilities:    Current regulatory liabilities:
Overcollection of costs to be passed back to customers$83

$14
 1 yearOvercollection of costs to be passed back to customers$18 $47 1 year
Other3
 3
 VariousOtherVarious
Total current regulatory liabilities86
 17
 Total current regulatory liabilities19 48 
Noncurrent regulatory liabilities:    Noncurrent regulatory liabilities:
IPL and DPL accrued costs of removal and ARO's847
 830
 Over life of assets
IPL and DPL income taxes payable to customers through rates246
 243
 Various
AES Indiana and AES Ohio accrued costs of removal and AROsAES Indiana and AES Ohio accrued costs of removal and AROs868 863 Over life of assets
AES Indiana and AES Ohio income taxes payable to customers through ratesAES Indiana and AES Ohio income taxes payable to customers through rates158 174 Various
Other53
 6
 VariousOther30 21 Various
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities1,146
 1,079
 Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities1,056 1,058 
TOTAL REGULATORY LIABILITIES$1,232
 $1,096
 
Total regulatory liabilitiesTotal regulatory liabilities$1,075 $1,106 
_____________________________
(1)
Past expenditures on which the Company earns a rate of return.
Our regulatory assets and current regulatory liabilities primarily consist of under or overcollection of costs that are generally non-controllable, such as purchased electricity, energy transmission, the difference between actual fuel costs, and the fuel costs recovered in the tariffs, and other sector costs. These costs are recoverable or refundable as defined by the laws and regulations in our markets. Our regulatory assets also include defined pension and postretirement benefit obligations equal to the previously unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and prior servicesservice costs that are expected to be recovered through future


159 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

rates. Additionally, our regulatory assets include the carrying value of AES Indiana's Petersburg Unit 1 at its retirement date and the expected carrying value of Petersburg Unit 2 at its anticipated retirement date, which are amortized over the life of the assets beginning on the dates of retirement. Other current and noncurrent regulatory assets primarily consist of:
Demand chargesUndercollections on rate riders such as wholesale margin sharing and demand side management costs at DPL;AES Indiana and energy efficiency and transmission costs at AES Ohio;
Unamortized premiums reacquired or redeemed on long-term debt at IPL and DPL,AES Indiana, which are amortized over the lives of the original issuances; and
Costs to comply with environmental regulations.
OVEC costs, vegetation management costs, and storm costs at AES Ohio.
Our noncurrent regulatory liabilities primarily consist of obligations for removal costs which do not have an associated legal retirement obligation. Our noncurrent regulatory liabilities also include deferred income taxes associated with the reduction of the U.S. federalrelated to differences in income recognition between tax ratelaws and accounting methods, which will be passed through to our regulated customers via a decrease in future retail rates, see Note 21—Income Taxes for further information.rates.
In the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, the current regulatory assets and liabilities are reflected in Other current assets and Accrued and other liabilities, respectively, and the noncurrent regulatory assets and liabilities are reflected in Other noncurrent assets and Other noncurrent liabilities, respectively. TheAll of the regulatory assets and liabilities primarilyas of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are related to the US and Utilities SBU as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.SBU.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

10.11. DEBT
NON-RECOURSE DEBT — The following table summarizes the carrying amount and terms of non-recourse debt at our subsidiaries as of the periods indicated (in millions):
NON-RECOURSE DEBTWeighted Average Interest Rate Maturity December 31,NON-RECOURSE DEBTWeighted Average Interest RateMaturityDecember 31,
2018 201720212020
Variable Rate:    Variable Rate:
Bank loans4.46% 2019 – 2050 $2,600
 $2,488
Bank loans1.89%2022 - 2079$2,345 $3,494 
Notes and bonds3.89% 2020 – 2030 821
 900
Notes and bonds1.01%2022 - 20411,121 800 
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (1)
3.56% 2023 – 2034 3,292
 3,668
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (1)
2.07%2023 - 202679 457 
OtherOther4.44%2022 - 2027125 — 
Fixed Rate:    Fixed Rate:
Bank loans4.62% 2019 – 2040 1,684
 993
Bank loans3.58%2022 - 2033359 2,965 
Notes and bonds5.85% 2019 – 2073 7,346
 7,388
Notes and bonds5.03%2022 - 207910,914 8,907 
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (1)
5.45% 2023 – 2034 246
 271
Debt to (or guaranteed by) multilateral, export credit agencies or development banks (1)
6.75%202434 
Other5.87% 2023 – 2061 24
 26
Other7.06%2022 - 206179 18 
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net (368) (394)Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(214)(321)
Subtotal $15,645
 $15,340
Subtotal$14,811 $16,354 
Less: Current maturities(2) (1,659) (2,164)(1,361)(1,426)
Noncurrent maturities $13,986
 $13,176
Noncurrent maturities (2) (3)
Noncurrent maturities (2) (3)
$13,450 $14,928 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)    Multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals, multilaterals, development banks and other similar institutions.
(2)    Excludes $6 million and $4 million (current) and $128 million and $77 million (noncurrent) finance lease liabilities included in the respective non-recourse debt line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. See Note 14—Leases for further information.
(3)    Excludes $25 million of failed sale-leaseback transaction liabilities included in the non-recourse debt line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021.
Multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals, multilaterals, development banks and other similar institutions.
The interest rate on variable rate debt represents the total of a variable component that is based on changes in an interest rate index and of a fixed component. The Company has interest rate swaps and option agreements in an aggregate notional principal amount of approximately $3.9 billion on non-recourse debt outstanding at December 31, 2018. These agreementsthat economically fix the variable component of the interest rates on the portion of the variable rate debt being hedged so that the total interest ratein an aggregate notional principal amount of approximately $1.3 billion on thatnon-recourse debt has been fixedoutstanding at rates ranging from approximately 2.24% to 8.00%.December 31, 2021.


160 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

Non-recourse debt as of December 31, 20182021 is scheduled to reach maturity as shown below (in millions):
December 31,Annual Maturities
2019$1,697
20201,458
20211,601
20221,530
20231,316
Thereafter8,411
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(368)
Total$15,645

December 31,Annual Maturities
2022$1,370 
2023874 
20241,378 
20251,393 
2026815 
Thereafter9,195 
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(214)
Total$14,811 
As of December 31, 2018,2021, AES subsidiaries with facilities under construction had a total of approximately $811$7 million of committed but unused credit facilities available to fund construction and other related costs. Excluding these facilities under construction, AES subsidiaries had approximately $1.8 billion$823 million in various unused committed credit lines to support their working capital, debt service reserves and other business needs. These credit lines can be used for borrowings, letters of credit, or a combination of these uses.
Significant transactions — During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, the Company's subsidiaries had the following significant debt transactions:
SubsidiaryTransaction Period Issuances Repayments Gain (Loss) on Extinguishment of Debt
Southland (1)
Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4 $757
 $
 $
TietêQ1 385
 (231) 
Alto MaipoQ2 104
 
 
DPLQ2 
 (106) (6)
GenerQ3 
 (104) (7)
AngamosQ3 
 (98) 
IPALCOQ4 105
 (89) 
Total  $1,351
 $(628) $(13)

SubsidiaryTransaction PeriodIssuancesRepaymentsLoss on Extinguishment of Debt
AES BrasilQ1, Q4412 (382)(27)
AES Clean Energy Development (1)
Q3, Q4502 — — 
Andres (2)
Q2300 (274)(14)
AES AndesQ3— (129)(14)
IPALCOQ395 (95)— 
_____________________________
(1)(1)
Issuances relate to the June 2017, long-term non-recourse debt financing to fund the Southland re-powering construction projects.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Clean Energy and AES Renewable Holdings.
AES Argentina (2)Repayments relate to Andres and DPP.
Panama— In February 2017,August 2020, AES ArgentinaPanama issued $300 million$1.4 billion aggregate principal of unsecured4.375% senior secured notes and unsubordinated notesa $105 million term loan due in 2024.2030 and 2023, respectively. The net proceeds from thisthe issuance were used for the prepayment of $75to prepay $447 million, $171 million, and $610 million of non-recourse debt related tooutstanding indebtedness at AES Panama, Changuinola, and Colon, respectively. As a result of these transactions, the construction of the San Nicolas Plant resulting inCompany recognized a gainloss on extinguishment of debt of approximately$16 million.
Cochrane — In July 2020, Cochrane issued $485 million aggregate principal of 6.25% senior secured notes due in 2034. The net proceeds from the issuance were used to prepay the outstanding principal of $445 million plus accrued interest on its senior secured facility agreement executed in 2019.
DPL — In June 2020, DPL issued $415 million aggregate principal of 4.125% senior secured notes due in 2025. In July 2020, the net proceeds from the issuance were used to prepay the outstanding principal of $380 million of its 7.25% senior unsecured notes due in 2021. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $34 million.
IPALCO — In April 2020, IPALCO issued $475 million aggregate principal of 4.25% senior secured notes due in 2030. The net proceeds from the issuance were used to prepay the outstanding principal of $405 million of its 3.45% senior unsecured notes and a $65 million term loan both due in July 2020. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2 million.
Non-Recourse Debt Covenants, Restrictions and Defaults — The terms of the Company's non-recourse debt include certain financial and nonfinancial covenants. These covenants are limited to subsidiary activity and vary among the subsidiaries. These covenants may include, but are not limited to, maintenance of certain reserves and financial ratios, minimum levels of working capital and limitations on incurring additional indebtedness.
As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, approximately $627$370 million and $642$587 million, respectively, of restricted cash was maintained in accordance with certain covenants of the non-recourse debt agreements, and theseagreements. These amounts were included within Restricted cash and Debt service reserves and other deposits in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.


161 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

Various lender and governmental provisions restrict the ability of certain of the Company's subsidiaries to transfer their net assets to the Parent Company. Such restricted net assets of subsidiaries amounted to approximately $2.9$1.5 billion at December 31, 2018.2021.
The following table summarizes the Company's subsidiary non-recourse debt in default (in millions) as of December 31, 2018.2021. Due to the defaults, these amounts are included in the current portion of non-recourse debt:
 Primary Nature
of Default
 December 31, 2018
SubsidiaryDefault Net Assets
AES Puerto RicoCovenant $317
 $139
AES Ilumina (Puerto Rico)Covenant 34
 17
Total  $351
(1) 

_____________________________
(1)    This does not include $483 million of non-recourse debt at Colon, one of the Company’s subsidiaries in Panama, that has been classified as current. Colon is currently in compliance with all provisions of its financing agreements, but does not expect to complete a required contract assignment to the lenders by the March 31, 2019 deadline. The Company is working with the lenders to modify the loan agreement to amend the requirement of this technical covenant in 2019. If this amendment is executed, the debt will be re-classified as noncurrent.
Primary Nature
of Default
December 31, 2021
SubsidiaryDebt in DefaultNet Assets
AES Puerto RicoCovenant$201 $(182)
AES Ilumina (Puerto Rico)Covenant29 25 
AES Jordan SolarCovenant
Total$237 
The above defaults are not payment defaults. All ofIn Puerto Rico, the subsidiary non-recourse debt defaults were triggered by failure to comply with covenants and/or conditions such as (but not limited to) failure to meet information covenants, complete construction or other milestones in an allocated time, meet certain minimum or maximum financial ratios, or other requirements contained in the non-recourse debt documents due to the bankruptcy of the applicable subsidiary.offtaker.
The AES Corporation's recourse debt agreements include cross-default clauses that will trigger if a subsidiary or group of subsidiaries for which the non-recourse debt is in default provides 20% or more than 20% of the Parent Company's total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company hashad no defaults which resultresulted in or arewere at risk of triggering a cross-default under the recourse debt of the Parent Company. In the event the Parent Company is not in compliance with the financial covenants of its senior secured revolving credit facility, restricted payments will be limited to regular quarterly shareholder dividends at the then-prevailing rate. Payment defaults and bankruptcy defaults would preclude the making of any restricted payments.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

RECOURSE DEBT — The following table summarizes the carrying amount and terms of recourse debt of the Company as of the periods indicated (in millions):
Interest RateFinal MaturityDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Senior Unsecured Note3.30%2025900 900 
Drawings on revolving credit facilityLIBOR + 1.75%2026365 70 
Senior Unsecured Note1.375%2026800 800 
Senior Unsecured Note3.95%2030700 700 
Senior Unsecured Note2.45%20311,000 1,000 
Other (1)
CDI + 7.00%202225 18 
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(36)(41)
Subtotal$3,754 $3,447 
Less: Current maturities(25)(1)
Noncurrent maturities$3,729 $3,446 
 Interest Rate Final Maturity December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Senior Unsecured Note8.00% 2020 $
 $228
Senior Unsecured Note4.00% 2021 500
 
Senior Unsecured Note7.38% 2021 
 690
Drawings on secured credit facilityLIBOR + 2.00% 2021 
 207
Senior Secured Term LoanLIBOR + 1.75% 2022 366
 521
Senior Unsecured Note4.88% 2023 713
 713
Senior Unsecured Note4.50% 2023 500
 
Senior Unsecured Note5.50% 2024 63
 738
Senior Unsecured Note5.50% 2025 544
 573
Senior Unsecured Note6.00% 2026 500
 500
Senior Unsecured Note5.13% 2027 500
 500
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net    (31) (40)
Subtotal    $3,655
 $4,630
Less: Current maturities    (5) (5)
Noncurrent maturities    $3,650
 $4,625
_____________________________

(1)
Represents project-level limited recourse debt at AES Holdings Brasil Ltda.
The following table summarizes the principal amounts due under our recourse debt for the next five years and thereafter (in millions):
December 31,Net Principal Amounts Due
2022$25 
2023— 
2024— 
2025900 
20261,165 
Thereafter1,700 
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(36)
Total recourse debt$3,754 
December 31,Net Principal Amounts Due
2019$5
20205
2021505
2022350
20231,213
Thereafter1,608
Unamortized (discount) premium & debt issuance (costs), net(31)
Total recourse debt$3,655
In September 2021, AES executed an amendment to its revolving credit facility. The aggregate commitment under the new agreement is $1.25 billion and matures in September 2026. The prior credit agreement had an aggregate commitment of $1 billion and matured on December 20, 2024. As of December 31, 2021, AES had outstanding drawings under its revolving credit facility of $365 million.


162 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

In December 2018,July 2021, AES offered to exchange up to $800 million of the newly registered 1.375% Senior Notes due in 2026 for up to $800 million of the existing unregistered 1.375% Senior Notes due in 2026 and up to $1 billion of our newly registered 2.45% Senior Notes due in 2031 for up to $1 billion of the existing unregistered 2.45% Senior Notes due in 2031. The terms of the new notes are identical in all material respects to the terms of the old notes with the exception that the new notes have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In August 2021, $798 million and $997 million of the 2026 and 2031 Notes were exchanged under the offer, respectively. Although not all investors participated in the exchange, there was no change to the outstanding indebtedness.
During the first quarter of 2020, the Company prepaid $150drew $840 million on revolving lines of credit at the Parent Company, of which approximately $250 million was used to enhance our liquidity position due to the uncertain economic conditions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, and the remaining $590 million was used for other general corporate purposes. During the remainder of 2020, the Parent Company drew an additional $755 million and repaid $1.5 billion on these revolving lines of credit. The entire $250 million related to the COVID-19 pandemic was repaid during the second quarter of 2020.
In May 2020, the Company issued $900 million aggregate principal of its existing senior secured term loan due in 2022. As a result of the transaction, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1 million.
In March 2018, the Company purchased via tender offers $671 million aggregate principal of its existing 5.50%3.30% senior unsecured notes due in 20242025 and $29$700 million of its existing 5.50%3.95% senior unsecured notes due in 2025.2030. The Company used the net proceeds from these issuances to purchase via tender offer a portion of the 4.00%, 4.50%, and 4.875% senior notes due in 2021, 2023, and 2023, respectively. Subsequent to the tender offers, the Company redeemed the remaining balance of its 4.00% and 4.875% senior notes due in 2021 and 2023, respectively, and $7 million of the remaining 4.50% senior notes due in 2023. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $44$37 million.
In March 2018,December 2020, the Company issued $500$800 million aggregate principal of 4.00%1.375% senior unsecured notes due in 20212026 and $500 million$1 billion aggregate principal of 4.50%2.45% senior unsecured notes due in 2023.2031. The Company used the net proceeds from these issuances to purchase via tender offer in full the $228 millionremaining balance of its 8.00%5.50%, 6.00%, and 5.125% senior notes due in 20202025, 2026, and 2027, respectively. Subsequent to the $690 milliontender offers, the Company redeemed the remaining balance of its 7.375% senior4.50% and 5.50% notes due in 2021.2023 and 2024, respectively. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $125 million.
In August 2017, the Company issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.125% senior notes due in 2027. The Company used these proceeds to redeem at par $240 million aggregate principal of its existing LIBOR + 3.00% senior unsecured notes due in 2019 and purchased $217 million of its existing 8.00% senior unsecured notes due in 2020. As a result of the latter transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $36 million.
In May 2017, the Company closed on $525 million aggregate principal LIBOR + 2.00% secured term loan due in 2022. In June 2017, the Company used these proceeds to redeem at par all $517 million aggregate principal of its existing Term Convertible Securities. As a result of the latter transaction, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $6 million.
In March 2017, the Company redeemed via tender offers $276 million aggregate principal of its existing 7.375% senior unsecured notes due in 2021 and $24 million of its existing 8.00% senior unsecured notes due in 2020. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $47$108 million.
Recourse Debt Covenants and Guarantees — The Company's obligations under the senior securedrevolving credit facility and indentures governing the senior secured term loannotes due 2025 and 2030 are currently unsecured following the achievement of two investment grade ratings and the release of security in accordance with the terms of the facility and the notes. If the Company’s credit rating falls below "Investment Grade" from at least two of Fitch Investors Service Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., as determined in accordance with the terms of the revolving credit facility and indenture dated May 15, 2020 (BBB-, or in the case of Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. Baa3), then the obligations under the revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the senior notes due 2025 and 2030 become, subject to certain exceptions, secured by (i) all of the capital stock of

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

domestic subsidiaries owned directly by the Company or certain subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of certain foreign subsidiaries owned directly or indirectly by the Company;Company and certain subsidiaries, and (ii) certain intercompany receivables, certain intercompany notes and certain intercompany tax sharing agreements.
The senior secured credit facility and senior secured term loan are subject to mandatory prepayment under certain circumstances, including the sale of certain assets. In such a situation, the net cash proceeds from the sale must be applied pro rata to repay the term loan, if any, using 60% of net cash proceeds, reduced to 50% when and if the Parent Company's recourse debt to cash flow ratio is less than 5:1. The lenders have the option to waive their pro rata redemption.
The senior securedrevolving credit facility contains customary covenants and restrictions on the Company's ability to engage in certain activities, including, but not limited to, limitations on other indebtedness, liens, investments and guarantees; limitations on restricted payments such as shareholder dividends and equity repurchases;liens; restrictions on mergers and acquisitions salesand the disposition of assets, leases, transactions with affiliates and off-balance sheet or derivative arrangements;assets; and other financial reporting requirements.
The senior securedrevolving credit facility also contains one financial covenants,covenant, evaluated quarterly, requiring the Company to maintain a minimum ratio of adjusted operating cash flow to interest charges on recourse debt of 1.3 times and a maximum ratio of recourse debt to adjusted operating cash flow of 7.55.75 times.
The terms of the Company's senior unsecured notes and senior secured term loan contain certain customary covenants, including limitations on the Company's ability to incur liens or enter into sale and leaseback transactions.
TERM CONVERTIBLE TRUST SECURITIES — In 1999, AES Trust III, a wholly-owned special purpose business trust and a VIE, issued approximately 10.35 million of $50 par value TECONS with a quarterly coupon payment of $0.844 for total proceeds of $517 million and concurrently purchased $517 million of 6.75% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures due 2029 (the "6.75% Debentures") issued by AES. AES, at its option, may redeem the 6.75% Debentures which would result in the required redemption of the TECONS issued by AES Trust III for $50 per TECON. As of December 31, 2016, the sole assets of AES Trust III were the 6.75% Debentures. In June 2017, the Company redeemed the 6.75% Debentures and redeemed at par all remaining aggregate principal of its existing TECONs.
11.

163 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

12. COMMITMENTS
LEASES — The Company enters into long-term non-cancelable lease arrangements which, for accounting purposes, are classified as either operating or capital leases. Operating leases primarily include certain transmission lines, office rental and site leases. Operating lease rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $51 million, $61 million and $61 million, respectively. Capital leases primarily include transmission lines, vehicles, offices, and other operating equipment. Capital leases are recognized in Property, Plant and Equipment within Electric generation, distribution assets and other. The gross value of the capital lease assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $13 million and $27 million, respectively. The following table shows the future minimum lease payments under operating and capital leases for continuing operations together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments under capital leases as of December 31, 2018 for 2019 through 2023 and thereafter (in millions):
 Future Commitments for
December 31,Capital Leases Operating Leases
2019$1
 $74
20201
 38
20211
 25
20221
 26
20231
 25
Thereafter7
 455
Total$12
 $643
Less: Imputed interest(6)  
Present value of total minimum lease payments$6
  
CONTRACTS The Company enters into long-term contracts for construction projects, maintenance and service, transmission of electricity, operations services and purchases of electricity and fuel. In general, these contracts are subject to variable quantities or prices and are terminable only in limited circumstances. The following table shows the future minimum commitments for continuing operations under these contracts as of December 31,

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

2018 2021 for 20192022 through 20232026 and thereafter as well as actual purchases under these contracts for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 20162019 (in millions):
Actual purchases during the year ended December 31,Electricity Purchase Contracts Fuel Purchase Contracts Other Purchase Contracts
2016$420
 $1,790
 $817
2017747
 1,619
 1,945
2018827
 1,838
 1,671
Future commitments for the year ending December 31,     
2019$786
 $1,494
 $1,375
2020602
 1,027
 681
2021371
 882
 336
2022234
 575
 561
2023393
 463
 213
Thereafter5,187
 1,734
 778
Total$7,573
 $6,175
 $3,944

Actual purchases during the year ended December 31,Electricity Purchase ContractsFuel Purchase ContractsOther Purchase Contracts
2019$1,597 $1,824 $1,684 
2020756 1,573 1,506 
2021709 2,070 1,261 
Future commitments for the year ending December 31,
2022$714 $1,882 $5,896 
2023570 1,157 617 
2024551 881 322 
2025546 837 230 
2026529 639 181 
Thereafter5,894 113 1,585 
Total$8,804 $5,509 $8,831 
12.13. CONTINGENCIES
Guarantees and Letters of Credit In connection with certain project financings, acquisitions and dispositions, power purchases, and other agreements, the Parent Company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments, most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events. In the normal course of business, the Parent Company has entered into various agreements, mainly guarantees and letters of credit, to provide financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of AES businesses. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness otherwise achieved by a business on a stand-alone basis, thereby facilitating the availability of sufficient credit to accomplish their intended business purposes. Most of the contingent obligations relate to future performance commitments which the Company expectsor its businesses expect to fulfill within the normal course of business. The expiration dates of these guarantees vary from less than one year to no more than 1615 years.
The following table summarizes the Parent Company's contingent contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018.2021. Amounts presented in the following table represent the Parent Company's current undiscounted exposure to guarantees and the range of maximum undiscounted potential exposure. The maximum exposure is not reduced by the amounts, if any, that could be recovered under the recourse or collateralization provisions in the guarantees. There were no9 obligations made by the Parent Company for the direct benefit of the lenders associated with the non-recourse debt of its businesses.
Contingent Contractual Obligations Amount (in millions) Number of Agreements Maximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement (in millions)Contingent Contractual ObligationsAmount (in millions)Number of AgreementsMaximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement (in millions)
Guarantees and commitments $685
 33 $0 — 157Guarantees and commitments$2,162 90$0 — 400
Letters of credit under the unsecured credit facility 368
 10 $1 — 247
Letters of credit under the senior secured credit facility 78
 23 $0 — 49
Asset sale related indemnities (1)
 27
 1 $27
Letters of credit under the unsecured credit facilitiesLetters of credit under the unsecured credit facilities119 31$0 — 42
Letters of credit under the revolving credit facilityLetters of credit under the revolving credit facility48 26$0 — 16
Surety bondSurety bond2$1
Total $1,158
 67 Total$2,331 149

_____________________________
(1)
Excludes normal and customary representations and warranties in agreements for the sale of assets (including ownership in associated legal entities) where the associated risk is considered to be nominal.
During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, the Company paid letter of credit fees ranging from 1% to 3% per annum on the outstanding amounts of letters of credit.
Environmental — The Company periodically reviews its obligations as they relate to compliance with environmental laws, including site restoration and remediation. For the periods ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the Company had recognized liabilities of $4 million and $5 million, respectively, for projected environmental remediation costs. Due to the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future costs of compliance or remediation could be higher or lower than the amount currently accrued. Moreover, where no liability has been recognized, it is reasonably possible that the Company may be required to incur remediation costs or make expenditures in amounts that could be material but could not be estimated as of December 31, 2018.2021. In aggregate, the Company estimates the range of potential losses related to environmental


164 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

matters, where estimable, to be up to $17$11 million. The amounts considered reasonably possible do not include amounts accrued as discussed above.
Litigation The Company is involved in certain claims, suits and legal proceedings in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for litigation and claims when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company has recognized aggregate liabilities for all claims of

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

approximately $53$23 million and $50$28 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. These amounts are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accrued and other liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities. A significant portion of these accrued liabilities relate to regulatory matters and commercial disputes in international jurisdictions. There can be no assurance that these accrued liabilities will be adequate to cover all existing and future claims or that we will have the liquidity to pay such claims as they arise.
Where no accrued liability has been recognized, it is reasonably possible that some matters could be decided unfavorably to the Company and could require the Company to pay damages or make expenditures in amounts that could be material but could not be estimated as of December 31, 2018.2021. The material contingencies where a loss is reasonably possible primarily include disputes with offtakers, suppliers and EPC contractors; alleged breaches of contract; alleged violation of laws and regulations; income tax and non-income tax matters with tax authorities; and regulatory matters. In aggregate, the Company estimates the range of potential losses, where estimable, related to these reasonably possible material contingencies to be between $79$255 million and $439$898 million. The amounts considered reasonably possible do not include the amounts accrued, as discussed above. TheseIncome tax-related material contingencies do not include income tax-related contingencies which arealready considered as part of our uncertain tax positions.positions are excluded from this note. See Note 23—Income Taxes of this Form 10-K for further information.
Tietê GSF Settlement— In December 2020, ANEEL published a regulation establishing the terms and conditions for compensation to Tietê for the non-hydrological risk charged to hydro generators through the incorrect application of the GSF mechanism from 2013 until 2018. In accordance with the regulation, this compensation will be in the form of a concession extension period of approximately 2.7 years. As a result, the previously recognized contingent liabilities related to GSF payments were updated to reflect the Company's best estimate for the fair value of compensation to be received from the concession extension offered in conjunction with the regulation. This compensation was estimated to have a fair value of $184 million, and was recorded as a reversal of Non-RegulatedCost of Sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. The concession extension also met the criteria for recognition as a definite-lived intangible asset, which was amortized from the date of the agreement until the end of the new concession period. The value of the concession extension was based on a preliminary time-value equivalent calculation made by the CCEE and subsequent adjustments requested by Tietê, which was determined to be fair value. In March 2021, the CCEE’s final calculation of fair value was $190 million and the Company recognized an additional reversal of Non-RegulatedCost of Sales of $6 million. Both the concession extension period and its equivalent asset value are subject to a final agreement between ANEEL and AES.
13.
14. LEASES
LESSEE — Right-of-use assets are long-term by nature. The following table summarizes the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to lease asset and liability balances as of the periods indicated (in millions):
Consolidated Balance Sheet ClassificationDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Assets
Right-of-use assets — finance leasesElectric generation, distribution assets and other$125 $74 
Right-of-use assets — operating leasesOther noncurrent assets278 275 
Total right-of-use assets$403 $349 
Liabilities
Finance lease liabilities (current)Non-recourse debt (current liabilities)$$
Finance lease liabilities (noncurrent)Non-recourse debt (noncurrent liabilities)128 77 
Total finance lease liabilities134 81 
Operating lease liabilities (current)Accrued and other liabilities20 17 
Operating lease liabilities (noncurrent)Other noncurrent liabilities294 293 
Total operating lease liabilities314 310 
Total lease liabilities$448 $391 


165 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

The following table summarizes supplemental balance sheet information related to leases as of the periods indicated:
Lease Term and Discount RateDecember 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Weighted-average remaining lease term — finance leases32 years31 years
Weighted-average remaining lease term — operating leases23 years23 years
Weighted-average discount rate — finance leases4.65 %4.11 %
Weighted-average discount rate — operating leases6.70 %6.81 %
The following table summarizes the components of lease expense recognized in Cost of Sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended (in millions):
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Components of Lease Cost20212020
Operating lease cost$36 $36 
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets
Interest on lease liabilities
Short-term lease costs21 13 
Variable lease cost— 
Total lease cost$66 $56 
Operating cash outflows from operating leases included in the measurement of lease liabilities were $39 million and $41 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and operating cash outflows from finance leases were $2 million for each of the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities were $37 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020.
The following table shows the future lease payments under operating and finance leases for continuing operations together with the present value of the net lease payments as of December 31, 2021 for 2022 through 2026 and thereafter (in millions):
Maturity of Lease Liabilities
Finance LeasesOperating Leases
2022$$32 
202330 
202429 
202527 
202626 
Thereafter240 488 
Total277 632 
Less: Imputed interest(143)(318)
Present value of lease payments$134 $314 
LESSOR — The Company has operating leases for certain generation contracts that contain provisions to provide capacity to a customer, which is a stand-ready obligation to deliver energy when required by the customer. Capacity payments are generally considered lease elements as they cover the majority of available output from a facility. The allocation of contract payments between the lease and non-lease elements is made at the inception of the lease. Lease payments from such contracts are recognized as lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term, whereas variable lease payments are recognized when earned.
The following table presents lease revenue from operating leases in which the Company is the lessor for the periods indicated (in millions):
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Lease Income20212020
Total lease revenue$595 $580 
Less: Variable lease revenue75 66 
Total non-variable lease revenue$520 $514 


166 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

The following table presents the underlying gross assets and accumulated depreciation of operating leases included in Property, Plant and Equipment for the periods indicated (in millions):
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
Lease Assets20212020
Gross assets$2,423 $3,103 
Accumulated depreciation765 1,011 
Net assets$1,658 $2,092 
The option to extend or terminate a lease is based on customary early termination provisions in the contract, such as payment defaults, bankruptcy, or lack of performance on energy delivery. The Company has not recognized any early terminations as of December 31, 2021. Certain leases may provide for variable lease payments based on usage or index-based (e.g., the U.S. Consumer Price Index) adjustments to lease payments.
The following table shows the future lease receipts as of December 31, 2021 for 2022 through 2026 and thereafter (in millions):
Future Cash Receipts for
Sales-Type LeasesOperating Leases
2022$20 $460 
202220 398 
202321 398 
202421 399 
202621 282 
Thereafter315 747 
Total418 $2,684 
Less: Imputed interest(198)
Present value of total lease receipts$220 
Battery Storage Lease Arrangements — The Company is constructing and operating projects that pair BESS with solar energy systems, which allows the project more flexibility on when to provide energy to the grid. The Company will enter into PPAs for the full output of the facility that allow customers the ability to determine when to charge and discharge the BESS. These arrangements include both lease and non-lease elements under ASC 842, with the BESS component constituting a sales-type lease. Upon commencement of the lease, the book value of the leased asset is removed from the balance sheet and a net investment in sales-type lease is recognized based on the present value of fixed payments under the contract and the residual value of the underlying asset. Due to the variable nature of lease payments under these contracts, the Company recorded losses at commencement of sales-type leases of $13 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. No losses were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020. These amounts are recognized in Other expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 21—Other Income and Expense for further information. The Company recognized lease income on sales-type leases through variable payments of $3 million and $5 million and interest income of $15 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
15. BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Contribution PlanPlans The Company sponsors four4 defined contribution plans ("the DC Plans"). Two plans cover U.S. non-union employees; one1 for Parent Company and certain US and Utilities SBU business employees, and one1 for DPL employees. The remaining two plans include union and non-union employees at IPLAES Indiana and union employees at DPL. The DC Plans are qualified under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. Most U.S. employees of the Company are eligible to participate in the appropriate plan except for those employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, unless such agreement specifically provides that the employee is considered an eligible employee under a plan. Within the DC Plans, the Company provides matching contributions in addition to other non-matching contributions. Participants are fully vested in their own contributions. The Company's contributions vest over various time periods ranging from immediate up to five years. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, costs for defined contribution plans were approximately $26 million, $21 million $23 million and $15$19 million, respectively.
Defined Benefit Plans — Certain of the Company's subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of their respective employees ("the DB Plans"). Pension benefits are based on years of credited service, age of the participant, and average earnings. Of the 3032 active DB Plans as of December 31, 2018, five2021, 5 are at U.S. subsidiaries and the remaining plans are at foreign subsidiaries.


167 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

The following table reconciles the Company's funded status, both domestic and foreign, as of the periods indicated (in millions):
  2018 2017
  U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign
CHANGE IN PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:        
Benefit obligation as of January 1 $1,257
 $470
 $1,188
 $411
Service cost 15
 12
 13
 10
Interest cost 40
 22
 41
 22
Employee contributions 
 1
 
 1
Plan amendments 10
 
 1
 (1)
Plan curtailments 
 
 3
 
Plan settlements 
 (21) 
 (2)
Benefits paid (105) (17) (71) (22)
Plan combinations 
 (4) 
 
Actuarial (gain) loss (99) (8) 82
 29
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes 
 (38) 
 22
Benefit obligation as of December 31 $1,118
 $417
 $1,257
 $470
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:        
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1 $1,127
 $455
 $1,044
 $402
Actual return on plan assets (35) 6
 141
 31
Employer contributions 39
 21
 13
 18
Employee contributions 
 1
 
 1
Plan settlements 
 (21) 
 (2)
Benefits paid (105) (17) (71) (22)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes 
 (35) 
 27
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31 $1,026
 $410
 $1,127
 $455
RECONCILIATION OF FUNDED STATUS        
Funded status as of December 31 $(92) $(7) $(130) $(15)

20212020
U.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation as of January 1$1,331 $218 $1,242 $224 
Service cost14 12 
Interest cost24 15 35 14 
Plan amendments— — 
Plan curtailments— (23)— (6)
Plan settlements— (1)— — 
Benefits paid(101)(10)(81)(9)
Actuarial (gain) loss(51)(16)122 19 
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes— (16)— (30)
Benefit obligation as of December 31$1,225 $173 $1,331 $218 
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1$1,249 $112 $1,154 $129 
Actual return on plan assets60 168 13 
Employer contributions10 
Plan settlements— (1)— — 
Benefits paid(101)(10)(81)(9)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes— (8)— (26)
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31$1,218 $106 $1,249 $112 
Reconciliation of funded status:
Funded status as of December 31$(7)$(67)$(82)$(106)
The following table summarizes the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the funded status of the DB Plans, both domestic and foreign, as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017
Amounts Recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign
Noncurrent assets $
 $64
 $
 $69
Accrued benefit liability—current 
 (6) 
 (6)
Accrued benefit liability—noncurrent (92) (65) (130) (78)
Net amount recognized at end of year $(92) $(7) $(130) $(15)

December 31,20212020
Amounts Recognized on the Consolidated Balance SheetsU.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Noncurrent assets$49 $$$— 
Accrued benefit liability—current— (7)— (8)
Accrued benefit liability—noncurrent(56)(67)(91)(98)
Net amount recognized at end of year$(7)$(67)$(82)$(106)
The following table summarizes the Company's U.S. and foreign accumulated benefit obligation as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,2018 2017
 U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign
Accumulated Benefit Obligation$1,101
 $376
 $1,236
 $433
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:       
Projected benefit obligation$1,118
 $89
 $1,257
 $109
Accumulated benefit obligation1,101
 79
 1,236
 97
Fair value of plan assets1,026
 33
 1,127
 33
Information for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:       
Projected benefit obligation$1,118
 $220
 $1,257
 $238
Fair value of plan assets1,026
 150
 1,127
 154

December 31,20212020
U.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Accumulated benefit obligation$1,199 $165 $1,306 $199 
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
Projected benefit obligation$458 $165 $494 $218 
Accumulated benefit obligation442 159 481 199 
Fair value of plan assets402 91 403 112 
Information for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
Projected benefit obligation$458 $165 $494 $218 
Fair value of plan assets402 91 403 112 
The following table summarizes the significant weighted average assumptions used in the calculation of benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost, both domestic and foreign, as of the periods indicated:
December 31, 2018 2017 December 31,20212020
 U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign U.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Benefit Obligation:Discount rate4.35% 5.63% 3.67% 5.23% Benefit Obligation:Discount rate2.82 %10.45 %2.45 %7.53 %
Rate of compensation increase3.34% 4.79% 3.34% 4.65% Rate of compensation increase2.75 %7.76 %2.75 %5.69 %
Periodic Benefit Cost:Discount rate3.67% 5.23%
(1) 
4.28% 5.83%
(1) 
Periodic Benefit Cost:Discount rate2.45 %7.53 %(1)3.32 %7.58 %(1)
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets5.73% 3.94% 6.67% 5.30% Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets4.91 %8.02 %5.24 %7.18 %
Rate of compensation increase3.34% 4.65% 3.34% 4.86% Rate of compensation increase2.75 %5.69 %2.86 %6.13 %
_____________________________
(1)
(1)Includes an inflation factor that is used to calculate future periodic benefit cost, but is not used to calculate the benefit obligation.
Includes an inflation factor that is used to calculate future periodic benefit cost, but is not used to calculate the benefit obligation.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

The Company establishes its estimated long-term return on plan assets considering various factors, which include the targeted asset allocation percentages, historic returns, and expected future returns.


168 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

The measurement of pension obligations, costs, and liabilities is dependent on a variety of assumptions. These assumptions include estimates of the present value of projected future pension payments to all plan participants, taking into consideration the likelihood of potential future events such as salary increases and demographic experience. These assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions.
The assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors: discount rates;rates, salary growth;growth, retirement rates; inflation;rates, inflation, expected return on plan assets;assets, and mortality rates. The effects of actual results differing from the Company's assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect the Company's recognized expense in such future periods. Unrecognized gains or losses are amortized using the “corridor approach,” under which the net gain or loss in excess of 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of the assets, if applicable, is amortized.
Sensitivity of the Company's pension funded status to the indicated increase or decrease in the discount rate and long-term rate of return on plan assets assumptions is shown below. Note that these sensitivities may be asymmetric and are specific to the base conditions at year-end 2018.2021. They also may not be additive, so the impact of changing multiple factors simultaneously cannot be calculated by combining the individual sensitivities shown. The funded status as of December 31, 20182021 is affected by the assumptions as of that date. Pension expense for 20182021 is affected by the December 31, 20172020 assumptions. The impact on pension expense from a one percentage point change in these assumptions is shown in the following table (in millions):
Increase of 1% in the discount rate $(12)
Decrease of 1% in the discount rate 12
Increase of 1% in the long-term rate of return on plan assets (16)
Decrease of 1% in the long-term rate of return on plan assets 16

Increase of 1% in the discount rate$(3)
Decrease of 1% in the discount rate
Increase of 1% in the long-term rate of return on plan assets(13)
Decrease of 1% in the long-term rate of return on plan assets13 
The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic benefit cost, both domestic and foreign, for the years indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017 2016
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost: U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign
Service cost $15
 $12
 $13
 $10
 $13
 $9
Interest cost 40
 22
 41
 23
 42
 21
Expected return on plan assets (64) (17) (69) (21) (68) (19)
Amortization of prior service cost 5
 
 6
 
 7
 (1)
Amortization of net loss 18
 3
 18
 2
 18
 2
Curtailment loss recognized 1
 
 4
 
 4
 
Settlement loss recognized 
 4
 
 
 
 
Total pension cost $15
 $24
 $13
 $14
 $16
 $12

December 31,202120202019
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:U.S.ForeignU.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Service cost$14 $$12 $$11 $
Interest cost24 15 35 14 44 19 
Expected return on plan assets(59)(8)(58)(7)(52)(14)
Amortization of prior service cost— — — 
Amortization of net loss15 14 15 
Curtailment (gain) loss recognized— (17)— — — — 
Total pension cost$(2)$(1)$$15 $23 $14 
The following table summarizes the amounts reflected in AOCL, including AOCL attributable to noncontrolling interests, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018,2021, that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost (in millions):
December 31, 2018Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 U.S. Foreign
Prior service cost$(4) $1
Unrecognized net actuarial loss(19) (76)
Total$(23) $(75)

December 31, 2021Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
U.S.Foreign
Prior service cost$(3)$
Unrecognized net actuarial loss(23)(42)
Total$(26)$(39)
The following table summarizes the Company's target allocation for 20182021 and pension plan asset allocation, both domestic and foreign, as of the periods indicated:
     Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,
 Target Allocations 2018 2017
Asset CategoryU.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign
Equity securities20% 3% 16.85% 3.75% 31.90% 4.61%
Debt securities78% 94% 80.20% 93.57% 64.53% 93.10%
Real estate2% —% 2.35% 0.44% 3.20% 0.44%
Other—% 3% 0.60% 2.24% 0.37% 1.85%
Total pension assets    100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%


THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,
Target Allocations20212020
Asset CategoryU.S.ForeignU.S.ForeignU.S.Foreign
Equity securities31%12%31.26 %14.76 %43.79 %14.85 %
Debt securities69%82%68.37 %82.40 %55.87 %82.30 %
Real estate—%2%— %1.11 %— %1.12 %
Other—%4%0.37 %1.73 %0.34 %1.73 %
Total pension assets100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %100.00 %
The U.S. DB Plans seek to achieve the following long-term investment objectives:
maintenance of sufficient income and liquidity to pay retirement benefits and other lump sum payments;
long-term rate of return in excess of the annualized inflation rate;
long-term rate of return, net of relevant fees, that meets or exceeds the assumed actuarial rate; and


169 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

long-term competitive rate of return on investments, net of expenses, that equals or exceeds various benchmark rates.
The asset allocation is reviewed periodically to determine a suitable asset allocation which seeks to manage risk through portfolio diversification and takes into account the above-stated objectives, in conjunction with current funding levels, cash flow conditions, and economic and industry trends. The following table summarizes the Company's U.S. DB Plan assets by category of investment and level within the fair value hierarchy as of the periods indicated (in millions):
  December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
U.S. Plans Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Equity securities:Mutual funds$173
 $
 $
 $173
 $359
 $
 $
 $359
Debt securities:Government debt securities170
 
 
 170
 135
 
 
 135
 
Mutual funds (1)
653
 
 
 653
 593
 
 
 593
Real estate:Real estate
 24
 
 24
 
 36
 
 36
Other:Cash and cash equivalents6
 
 
 6
 4
 
 
 4
 Total plan assets$1,002
 $24
 $
 $1,026
 $1,091
 $36
 $
 $1,127
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
U.S. PlansLevel 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Equity securities: (2)
Mutual funds$— $381 $— $381 $— $547 $— $547 
Debt securities: (2)
Mutual funds (1)
— 833 — 833 — 698 — 698 
Other:Cash and cash equivalents— — — — 
Total plan assets$$1,214 $— $1,218 $$1,245 $— $1,249 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)Mutual funds categorized as debt securities consist of mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.
(2)For the U.S. plans, the balances under the equity securities and debt securities categories represent investments through collective trusts. The plans have chosen collective trusts for which the underlying investments are mutual funds or mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.
Mutual funds categorized as debt securities consist of mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.
The investment strategy of the foreign DB Plans seeks to maximize return on investment while minimizing risk. The assumed asset allocation has less exposure to equities in order to closely match market conditions and near term forecasts. The following table summarizes the Company's foreign DB plan assets by category of investment and level within the fair value hierarchy as of the periods indicated (in millions):
  December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Foreign Plans Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Equity securities:Mutual funds$14
 $
 $
 $14
 $20
 $
 $
 $20
 Private equity
 
 1
 1
 
 
 1
 1
Debt securities:Government debt securities13
 
 
 13
 11
 
 
 11
 
Mutual funds (1)
287
 84
 
 371
 323
 90
 
 413
Real estate:Real estate
 
 2
 2
 
 
 2
 2
Other:Cash and cash equivalents2
 
 
 2
 
 
 
 
 Other assets1
 
 6
 7
 1
 
 7
 8
 Total plan assets$317
 $84
 $9
 $410
 $355
 $90
 $10
 $455

December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Foreign PlansLevel 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Equity securities:Mutual funds$15 $— $— $15 $16 $— $— $16 
Private equity— — — — 
Debt securities:
Mutual funds (1)
18 69 — 87 18 74 — 92 
Real estate:Real estate— — — — 
Other:Other assets— — 
Total plan assets$34 $69 $$106 $35 $74 $$112 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)Mutual funds categorized as debt securities consist of mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.
Mutual funds categorized as debt securities consist of mutual funds for which debt securities are the primary underlying investment.
The following table summarizes the estimated cash flows for U.S. and foreign expected employer contributions and expected future benefit payments, both domestic and foreign (in millions):
U.S.Foreign
Expected employer contribution in 2022$$
Expected benefit payments for fiscal year ending:
202267 15 
202367 14 
202468 16 
202568 17 
202669 18 
2027 - 2031342 115 
  U.S. Foreign
Expected employer contribution in 2019 $9
 $14
Expected benefit payments for fiscal year ending:    
2019 69
 23
2020 70
 21
2021 72
 23
2022 72
 24
2023 73
 25
2024 - 2028 367
 155

14.

170 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

16. REDEEMABLE STOCK OF SUBSIDIARIES
The following table is a reconciliation of changes in redeemable stock of subsidiaries (in millions):
December 31,20212020
Balance at the beginning of the period$872 $888 
Contributions from holders of redeemable stock of subsidiaries579 — 
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries(6)
Fair value adjustment
Other comprehensive loss attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries19 (28)
Acquisition and reclassification of stock of subsidiaries(211)— 
Balance at the end of the period$1,257 $872 
The following table summarizes the Company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,20212020
IPALCO common stock$700 $618 
AES Clean Energy Development common stock497 — 
AES Indiana preferred stock60 60 
Colon quotas (1)
— 194 
Total redeemable stock of subsidiaries$1,257 $872 
 _____________________________
(1)Characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock.
IPALCO — On December 13, 2021, CDPQ made equity capital contributions of $34 million to AES U.S. Investments, subsequently contributed to IPALCO by AES U.S. Investments, and $48 million to IPALCO as part of a capital call to raise proceeds for AES Indiana's TDSIC and replacement generation projects. The Company and CDPQ made capital contributions on a proportional share basis; therefore, the capital call did not change CDPQ or AES' ownership interests in IPALCO.
Colon — On September 13, 2021, the Company acquired the remaining 49.9% minority ownership interest in Colon, reducing the value of the Colon temporary equity to zero. See Note 17—Equity for further information.
AES Clean Energy Development — On February 1, 2021, the Company substantially completed the merger of the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms to form AES Clean Energy Development, which will serve as the development vehicle for all future renewable projects in the U.S. As part of the transaction, AlMCo, our existing partner in the sPower equity method investment, received a 25% minority ownership interest in the newly formed entity along with certain partnership rights, though not currently in effect, that would enable AIMCo to exit in the future. As a result, the minority ownership interest is considered temporary equity. AIMCo made capital contributions of $240 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.
During the second quarter of 2021, the Company recorded measurement period adjustments to the estimated fair values of the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms and the value of the partnership rights initially recorded in the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in an $81 million increase in the value of the temporary equity. These measurement period adjustments primarily relate to higher expected developer profits and a higher growth rate, reflective of additional information that became available regarding market participants’ views of the value of early-stage renewable development projects as of the date of acquisition. The temporary equity will be adjusted for earnings or losses allocated to the noncontrolling interest under ASC 810. Any subsequent changes in the redemption value of the exit rights will be recognized against permanent equity in accordance with ASC 480-10-S99, as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable. See Note 25Acquisitions for further information.
AES Indiana — AES Indiana had $60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, which represents 5 series of preferred stock. The total annual dividend requirements were approximately $3 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $100 and $118 per share. Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of AES Indiana's board of directors if AES Indiana has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for 4 consecutive quarters. Based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of AES Indiana's board of directors in this circumstance, the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity.


171 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

17. EQUITY
Equity Units
In March 2021, the Company issued 10,430,500 Equity Units with a total notional value of $1,043 million. Each Equity Unit has a stated amount of $100 and was initially issued as a Corporate Unit, consisting of a forward stock purchase contract (“2024 Purchase Contracts”) and a 10% undivided beneficial ownership interest in one share of 0% Series A Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock, issued without par and with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”).
Upon reconsideration of the nature of the Equity Units, the Company re-evaluated its accounting assessment and concluded that the Equity Units should be accounted for as one unit of account based on the economic linkage between the 2024 Purchase Contracts and the Series A Preferred Stock, as well as the Company's assessment of the applicable accounting guidance relating to combining freestanding instruments. The Equity Units represent mandatorily convertible preferred stock. Accordingly, the shares associated with the combined instrument are reflected in diluted earnings per share using the if-converted method.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company also corrected the classification of certain amounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Changes in Equity to reflect the 2024 Purchase Contracts and Series A Preferred Stock as one unit of account. The corrections have no impact on the Company's net earnings, total assets, cash flows, or segment information.
In conjunction with the issuance of the Equity Units, the Company received approximately $1 billion in proceeds, net of underwriting costs and commissions, before offering expenses. The proceeds for the issuance of 1,043,050 shares are attributed to the Series A Preferred Stock for $825 million, $205 million for the present value of the quarterly payments due to holders of the 2024 Purchase Contracts ("Contract Adjustment Payments"), and a beneficial conversion feature of $13 million. The proceeds will be used for the development of the AES renewable businesses, U.S. utility businesses, LNG infrastructure, and for other developments determined by management.
The Series A Preferred Stock will initially not bear any dividends and the liquidation preference of the convertible preferred stock will not accrete. The Series A Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless converted by holders or redeemed by the Company. Holders of the shares of the convertible preferred stock will have limited voting rights.
The Series A Preferred Stock is pledged as collateral to support holders’ purchase obligations under the 2024 Purchase Contracts and will be remarketed. In connection with any successful remarketing, the Company may increase the dividend rate, increase the conversion rate, and modify the earliest redemption date for the convertible preferred stock. After any successful remarketing in connection with which the dividend rate on the convertible preferred stock is increased, the Company will pay cumulative dividends on the convertible preferred stock, if declared by the board of directors, quarterly in arrears from the applicable remarketing settlement date.
Holders of Corporate Units may create Treasury Units or Cash Settled Units from their Corporate Units as provided in the Purchase Contract Agreement by substituting Treasury securities or cash, respectively, for the Convertible Preferred Stock comprising a part of the Corporate Units.
The Company may not redeem the Series A Preferred Stock prior to March 22, 2024. At the election of the Company, on or after March 22, 2024, the Company may redeem for cash, all or any portion of the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock at a redemption price equal to 100% of the liquidation preference, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends.
The 2024 Purchase Contracts obligate the holders to purchase, on February 15, 2024, for a price of $100 in cash, a maximum number of 57,215,465 shares of the Company’s common stock (subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments). The 2024 Purchase Contract holders may elect to settle their obligation early, in cash. The Series A Preferred Stock is pledged as collateral to guarantee the holders’ obligations to purchase common stock under the terms of the 2024 Purchase Contracts. The initial settlement rate determining the number of shares that each holder must purchase will not exceed the maximum settlement rate of 3.864, determined over a market value averaging period preceding February 15, 2024.


172 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

The settlement rate will be calculated using an initial reference price of $25.88, equal to the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock on March 4, 2021. If the applicable market value of the Company’s common stock is less than or equal to the reference price, the settlement rate will be the maximum settlement rate; and if the applicable market value of common stock is greater than the reference price, the settlement rate will be a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to $100 divided by the applicable market value. Upon successful remarketing of the Series A Preferred Stock ("Remarketed Series A Preferred Stock"), the Company expects to receive additional cash proceeds of $1 billion and issue shares of Remarketed Series A Preferred Stock.
The Company pays Contract Adjustment Payments to the holders of the 2024 Purchase Contracts at a rate of 6.875% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15, commencing on May 15, 2021. The $205 million present value of the Contract Adjustment Payments at inception reduces the Series A Preferred Stock. As each quarterly Contract Adjustment Payment is made, the related liability is reduced and the difference between the cash payment and the present value will accrete to interest expense, approximately $5 million over the three-year term.
The holders can settle the 2024 Purchase Contracts early, for cash, subject to certain exceptions and conditions in the prospectus supplement. Upon early settlement of any 2024 Purchase Contracts, the Company will deliver the number of shares of its common stock equal to 85% of the number of shares of common stock that would have otherwise been deliverable.
Equity Transactions with Noncontrolling Interests
Distributed EnergyColon — In September 2021, the Company acquired the remaining 49.9% minority ownership interest in Colon, becoming its sole owner. In conjunction with the acquisition, a note payable was recorded that is expected to be satisfied over two installments by the end of 2023. This transaction resulted in a $12 million decrease in Parent Company Stockholders’ Equity due to a decrease in additional paid-in-capital of $8 million and the reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive losses from Redeemable stock of subsidiaries to AOCL of $4 million. Colon is reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Chile Renovables — In July 2021, AES Andes completed the sale of a 49% ownership interest in Chile Renovables SpA (“Chile Renovables”), a subsidiary which owns the Los Cururos wind facility, to Global Infrastructure Management, LLC (“GIP”) for $53 million. AES Andes retained a 51% ownership interest in Chile Renovables and the transaction decreased the Company’s indirect ownership in the subsidiary to 34%. As part of the transaction, AES Andes will contribute a specified pipeline of renewable development projects to Chile Renovables as the projects reach commercial operations, and GIP will make additional contributions to maintain its 49% ownership interest. As the Company maintained control after the transaction, Chile Renovables continues to be consolidated by the Company within the South America SBU reportable segment.
Guaimbê Holding — In 2018, Distributed April 2021, Guaimbê Solar Holding S.A (“Guaimbê Holding”), a subsidiary of AES Brasil which wholly owns the Guaimbê solar complex and the Alto Sertão II wind facility, issued preferred shares representing 19.9% ownership in the subsidiary for total proceeds of $158 million. The transaction decreased the Company’s indirect ownership interest in the operational entities from 45.3% to 36.3%. As the Company maintained control after the transaction, Guaimbê Holding continues to be consolidated by the Company within the South America SBU reportable segment.
AES Andes — On December 29, 2020, AES Andes commenced a preemptive rights offering for its existing shareholders to subscribe for up to 1.98 billion of newly issued shares to fund its renewable growth program. The period ended on February 5, 2021 and Inversiones Cachagua SpA, an AES subsidiary, subscribed for 1.35 billion shares at a cost of $205 million, increasing AES’ indirect beneficial interest in AES Andes from 67% to 67.1%. The noncontrolling interest holders subscribed for 629 million shares, resulting in additional capital contributions of $94 million.
In December 2021, AES Andes sold shares acquired in the 2020 share buyback program as required by the holding period terms of the program, resulting in a decline in the Company's indirect beneficial interest in AES Andes from 67.1% to 67%. This transaction resulted in a $3 million decrease in Parent Company Stockholder's Equity due to a decrease in additional paid-in-capital. AES Andes is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.


173 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

SouthlandEnergy — In November 2020, the Company completed the sale of 35% of its ownership interest in the Southland Energy assets for $424 million, which decreased the Company's economic interest to 65%. However, under the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the Company is entitled to all earnings or losses until March 1, 2021, and any distributions related thereto. This transaction resulted in a $275 million increase in Parent Company Stockholder's Equity due to an increase in additional paid-in-capital of $266 million, net of tax and transaction costs, and the reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive losses from AOCL to NCI of $9 million. As the Company maintained control after the sale, Southland Energy continues to be consolidated by the Company within the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Cochrane — In September 2020, AES Andes completed the sale of a portion of its stake in Cochrane. The transaction included the issuance of preferred shares and the sale of 5% of its stake in the subsidiary for $113 million, which decreased the Company’s economic interest in Cochrane to 38%. The preferred shareholders have the preferential right to receive an annual amount equal to $12 million, from any dividends or distributions of capital, until reaching the original investment of $113 million plus a specified rate of return. In November 2020, Cochrane distributed $12 million to the preferred shareholders. As the Company maintained control after the sale, Cochrane continues to be consolidated by the Company within the South America SBU reportable segment.
AES BrasilIn August 2020, AES Holdings Brasil Ltda. ("AHB") completed the acquisition of an additional 18.5% ownership in AES Brasil for $240 million. During the fourth quarter of 2020, through multiple transactions, AHB acquired another 1.3% ownership in AES Brasil for $16 million. In aggregate, these transactions increased the Company's economic interest in AES Brasil to 44.1% and resulted in a $214 million decrease in Parent Company Stockholder's Equity due to a decrease in additional paid-in-capital of $94 million and the reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive losses from NCI to AOCL of $120 million. AES Brasil is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
In addition, AHB committed to migrate AES Tietê to the Novo Mercado, which is a listing segment of the Brazilian stock exchange that requires equity capital to be composed only of common shares. On December 18, 2020, the AES Tietê board approved a proposal for the corporate reorganization and exchange of shares issued by AES Tietê with newly issued shares of AES Brasil, a formerly wholly-owned entity of AES Tietê, with the intent to list AES Brasil on Novo Mercado as the 100% shareholder of AES Tietê. The reorganization and the exchange of shares was completed on March 26, 2021, and the shares issued by AES Brasil started trading on Novo Mercado on March 29, 2021. The Company maintains majority representation on AES Brasil’s board of directors, and as such, continues to consolidate AES Brasil’s results in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Through multiple transactions in 2021, AHB acquired an additional 1.6% ownership in AES Brasil for $17 million. These transactions increased the Company’s economic interest in AES Brasil to 45.7% and resulted in a $13 million decrease in Parent Company Stockholder’s Equity due to a decrease in additional paid-in-capital of $6 million and the reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive losses from NCI to AOCL of $7 million.
In October 2021, AES Brasil concluded a follow-on offering for the issuance of 93 million newly issued shares, which further increased the Company's indirect beneficial interest in AES Brasil to 46.7% and resulted in a $7 million increase in Parent Company Stockholder's Equity due to an increase in additional paid-in capital.
AES Renewable Holdings — In 2021, 2020 and 2019, AES Renewable Holdings, through multiple transactions, sold noncontrolling interests in multiple project companies to tax equity partners. These transactions resulted in a $98$127 million, $144 million, and $133 million increase to noncontrolling interest. Distributed Energyinterest in 2021, 2020, and 2019 respectively. AES Renewable Holdings is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Alto Maipo — In March 2017, AES Gener completed the legal and financial restructuring of Alto Maipo. As part of this restructuring, AES indirectly acquired the 40% ownership interest of the noncontrolling shareholder for a de

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

minimis payment, and sold a 6.7% interest in the project to the construction contractor. This transaction resulted in a $196 million increase to the Parent Company’s Stockholders’ Equity due to an increase in additional paid-in-capital of $229 million, offset by the reclassification of accumulated other comprehensive losses from NCI to the Parent Company Stockholders’ Equity of $33 million. No gain or loss was recognized in net income as the sale was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate. After completion of the sale, the Company has an effective 62% economic interest in Alto Maipo. As the Company maintained control of the partnership after the sale, Alto Maipo continues to be consolidated by the Company within the South America SBU reportable segment.
Dominican Republic — In September 2017, Linda Group acquired 5% of our Dominican Republic business for $60 million, pre-tax. This transaction resulted in a net increase of $25 million to the Company’s additional paid-in-capital and noncontrolling interest, respectively. No gain or loss was recognized in net income as the sale was not considered a sale of in-substance real estate. As the Company maintained control after the sale, our businesses in the Dominican Republic continue to be consolidated by the Company within the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
The following table summarizes the net income attributable to The AES Corporation and all transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,
202120202019
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(409)$46 $303 
Transfers from noncontrolling interest:
Increase (decrease) in The AES Corporation's paid-in capital for sale of subsidiary shares(7)260 (5)
Increase (decrease) in The AES Corporation's paid-in-capital for purchase of subsidiary shares(9)(89)— 
Net transfers (to) from noncontrolling interest(16)171 (5)
Change from net income attributable to The AES Corporation and transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests$(425)$217 $298 
  December 31,
  2018 2017 2016
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation $1,203
 $(1,161) $(1,130)
Transfers from noncontrolling interest:      
Increase (decrease) in The AES Corporation's paid-in capital for sale of subsidiary shares (3) 13
 84
Additional paid-in-capital, IPALCO shares, transferred to redeemable stock of subsidiaries (1)
 
 
 (84)
Increase (decrease) in The AES Corporation's paid-in-capital for purchase of subsidiary shares 
 240
 (2)
Net transfers (to) from noncontrolling interest (3) 253
 (2)
Change from net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation and transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests $1,200
 $(908) $(1,132)


_____________________________
(1)
See Note17—Redeemable stock of subsidiariesfor further information on increase in paid-in-capital transferred174 | Notes to redeemable stock of subsidiaries.
Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

Deconsolidations
Alto Maipo — In November 2021, Alto Maipo SpA filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Company determined it no longer had control over Alto Maipo and deconsolidated the business, which increased Parent Company Stockholder's Equity by $182 million due to the disposition of $177 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss and $5 million of accumulated deficit. See Note 24Held-for-Sale and Dispositionsfor further information.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss — The changes in AOCL by component, net of tax and noncontrolling interests, for the periods indicated were as follows (in millions):
 Foreign currency translation adjustment, net Derivative gains (losses), net Unfunded pension obligations, net Total
Balance at December 31, 2016$(2,147) $(323) $(286) $(2,756)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications18
 (14) (19) (15)
Amount reclassified to earnings643
 37
 248
 928
Other comprehensive income$661
 $23
 $229
 $913
Reclassification from NCI due to Alto Maipo Restructuring
 (33) 
 (33)
Balance at December 31, 2017$(1,486) $(333) $(57) $(1,876)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications$(214) $(64) $
 $(278)
Amount reclassified to earnings(21) 78
 7
 64
Other comprehensive income (loss)$(235) $14
 $7
 $(214)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
 19
 
 19
Balance at December 31, 2018$(1,721) $(300) $(50) $(2,071)


THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Foreign currency translation adjustment, netDerivative gains (losses), netUnfunded pension obligations, netTotal
Balance at December 31, 2019$(1,721)$(470)$(38)$(2,229)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications— (309)(12)(321)
Amount reclassified to earnings192 72 — 264 
Other comprehensive income (loss)192 (237)(12)(57)
Reclassification from NCI due to share sales and repurchases(115)(4)(111)
Balance at December 31, 2020$(1,644)$(699)$(54)$(2,397)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications(86)(7)23 (70)
Amount reclassified to earnings254 258 
Other comprehensive income (loss)(83)247 24 188 
Reclassification from NCI due to share sales and repurchases(7)(4)— (11)
Balance at December 31, 2021$(1,734)$(456)$(30)$(2,220)
Reclassifications out of AOCL are presented in the following table. Amounts for the periods indicated are in millions and those in parenthesis indicate debits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations:Operations
Details About   December 31,
AOCL Components Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations 2018 2017 2016
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net    
  Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests $19
 $(188) $
  Net loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued operations 2
 (455) (992)
  Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation $21
 $(643) $(992)
Derivative gains (losses), net    
  Non-regulated revenue $(6) $25
 $111
  Non-regulated cost of sales (3) (12) (57)
  Interest expense (49) (79) (107)
  Foreign currency transaction gains (59) 15
 8
  Income from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates (117) (51) (45)
  Income tax expense 24
 1
 8
  Income (loss) from continuing operations (93) (50) (37)
  Less: (Income) loss from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests 15
 13
 9
  Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation $(78) $(37) $(28)
Amortization of defined benefit pension actuarial losses, net    
  Non-regulated cost of sales 
 1
 
  General and administrative expenses 
 (1) (1)
  Other expense (6) 
 (1)
  Income from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates (6) 
 (2)
  Income tax expense 2
 
 3
  Income from continuing operations (4) 
 1
  Net loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued operations (2) (266) (11)
  Net income (loss) (6) (266) (10)
  Less: (Income) loss from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (1) 
 9
  Add: Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests 
 18
 
  Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation $(7) $(248) $(1)
Total reclassifications for the period, net of income tax and noncontrolling interests $(64) $(928) $(1,021)

Details AboutDecember 31,
AOCL ComponentsAffected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations202120202019
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests$(3)$(192)$(23)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(3)$(192)$(23)
Derivative gains (losses), net
Non-regulated revenue$(1)$(1)$(1)
Non-regulated cost of sales(3)(12)
Interest expense(85)(60)(26)
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests(362)— 
Asset impairment expense(13)(10)— 
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)(15)(7)(12)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates(475)(81)(50)
Income tax benefit (expense)105 17 13 
Net equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates(17)(10)(5)
Income (loss) from continuing operations(387)(74)(42)
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries133 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(254)$(72)$(36)
Amortization of defined benefit pension actuarial losses, net
Regulated cost of sales$— $(1)$— 
Non-regulated cost of sales(1)— 
Other expense(3)— (2)
Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests— — (26)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates(4)— (28)
Income tax benefit (expense)— — 
Income (loss) from continuing operations(1)— (28)
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable stock of subsidiaries— — 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(1)$— $(27)
Total reclassifications for the period, net of income tax and noncontrolling interests$(258)$(264)$(86)
Common Stock Dividends — The Parent Company paid dividends of $0.13$0.1505 per outstanding share to its common stockholders during the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 20182021 for dividends declared in December 2017,2020, February 2021, July 2021, and October 2018,2021, respectively.


175 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

On December 7, 2018,3, 2021, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.1365$0.1580 per share payable on February 15, 20192022 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 1, 2019.2022.
Stock Repurchase Program — No shares were repurchased in 2018.2021. The cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the Stock Repurchase Program in July 2010 through December 31, 20182021 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $1.9 billion, at an average price per share of $12.12 (including a nominal amount of commissions). As of December 31, 2018,2021, $264 million remained available for repurchase under the Stock Repurchase Program.
The common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method. A total of 154,905,595151,923,418 and 155,924,785153,028,526 shares were held as treasury stock at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,December 31, 2020, respectively. Restricted stock units under the Company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock. The Company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the Stock Repurchase Program in July 2010.
15.18. SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The segment reporting structure uses the Company's management reporting structure as its foundation to reflect how the Company manages the businesses internally and is mainly organized by geographic regions which provides a socio-political-economic understanding of our business. During the first quarter of 2018, the Andes and Brazil SBUs were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported together as part of the South America SBU. Further, the Puerto Rico and El Salvador businesses, formerly part of the MCAC SBU, were combined with the US SBU, which is now reported as the US and Utilities SBU. The management reporting structure is organized by four4 SBUs led by our President and Chief Executive Officer: US and Utilities, South America, MCAC, and Eurasia SBUs. Using the accounting guidance on segment reporting, the Company determined that its four4 operating segments are aligned with its four4 reportable segments corresponding to its SBUs. All prior period resultsIn January 2022, we internally announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to align our business to meet our customers' needs and deliver on our major strategic objectives. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have been retrospectively revised to reflect the newon our segment reporting structure.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Corporate and OtherThe results of the Fluence and Simple Energy equity affiliates are includedIncluded in "Corporate and Other". Also included are the results of the AES self-insurance company and certain equity affiliates, corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our four4 reportable segments, and certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation.
The Company uses Adjusted PTC as its primary segment performance measure. Adjusted PTC, a non-GAAP measure, is defined by the Company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to (a) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions and equity securities; (b) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses; (c) gains, losses, benefits and costs associated with dispositions and acquisitions of business interests, including early plant closures;closures, and gains and losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases; (d) losses due to impairments; (e) gains, losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt; and (f) costs directlynet gains at Angamos, one of our businesses in the South America SBU, associated with a major restructuring program, including, but not limited to, workforce reduction efforts, relocationsthe early contract terminations with Minera Escondida and office consolidation.Minera Spence. Adjusted PTC also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities. The Company has concluded Adjusted PTC better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company and is the most relevant measure considered in the Company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments. Additionally, given its large number of businesses and complexity, the Company concluded that Adjusted PTC is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the Company's results.    
Revenue and Adjusted PTC are presented before inter-segment eliminations, which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest, charges for certain management fees, and the write-off of intercompany balances, as applicable. All intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment. Inter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results.


176 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

The following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated (in millions):
Total Revenue
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
US and Utilities SBU$4,335 $3,918 $4,058 
South America SBU3,541 3,159 3,208 
MCAC SBU2,157 1,766 1,882 
Eurasia SBU1,123 828 1,047 
Corporate and Other116 231 46 
Eliminations(131)(242)(52)
Total Revenue$11,141 $9,660 $10,189 
 Total Revenue
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
US and Utilities SBU$4,230
 $4,162
 $4,330
South America SBU3,533
 3,252
 2,956
MCAC SBU1,728
 1,519
 1,274
Eurasia SBU1,255
 1,590
 1,670
Corporate and Other41
 35
 77
Eliminations(51) (28) (26)
Total Revenue$10,736
 $10,530
 $10,281
Reconciliation from Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Taxes and Equity in Earnings of Affiliates:Total Adjusted PTC
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates$(1,064)$488 $1,001 
Add: Net equity in losses of affiliates(24)(123)(172)
Less: Loss (income) from continuing operations before taxes, attributable to noncontrolling interests644 (192)(277)
Pre-tax contribution(444)173 552 
Unrealized derivative and equity securities losses (gains)(1)113 
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)14 (10)36 
Disposition/acquisition losses861 112 12 
Impairment losses1,153 928 406 
Loss on extinguishment of debt91 223 121 
Net gains from early contract terminations at Angamos(256)(182)— 
Total Adjusted PTC$1,418 $1,247 $1,240 
Total Adjusted PTC
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
US and Utilities SBU$660 $505 $569 
South America SBU423 534 504 
MCAC SBU314 287 367 
Eurasia SBU196 177 159 
Corporate and Other(182)(256)(347)
Eliminations— (12)
Total Adjusted PTC$1,418 $1,247 $1,240 
Total AssetsDepreciation and AmortizationCapital Expenditures
Year Ended December 31,202120202019202120202019202120202019
US and Utilities SBU$16,512 $14,464 $13,334 $549 $534 $465 $1,115 $1,099 $1,484 
South America SBU7,728 11,329 11,314 273 294 315 833 650 692 
MCAC SBU4,545 4,847 4,770 155 164 183 143 183 344 
Eurasia SBU3,466 3,621 3,990 66 63 67 20 30 
Corporate and Other712 342 240 13 13 15 29 19 
Total$32,963 $34,603 $33,648 $1,056 $1,068 $1,045 $2,140 $1,960 $2,551 
Interest IncomeInterest Expense
Year Ended December 31,202120202019202120202019
US and Utilities SBU$28 $17 $18 $362 $371 $301 
South America SBU100 64 95 239 237 285 
MCAC SBU14 22 139 157 142 
Eurasia SBU161 171 180 98 113 127 
Corporate and Other73 160 195 
Total$298 $268 $318 $911 $1,038 $1,050 
Investments in and Advances to AffiliatesNet Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Affiliates
Year Ended December 31,202120202019202120202019
US and Utilities SBU$510 $568 $465 $83 $(8)$11 
South America SBU19 13 77 — (80)(129)
MCAC SBU144 168 107 (23)(11)(13)
Eurasia SBU— 215 (9)
Corporate and Other407 85 102 (86)(28)(32)
Total$1,080 $835 $966 $(24)$(123)$(172)


Reconciliation from Income from Continuing Operations before Taxes and Equity in Earnings of Affiliates:Total Adjusted PTC
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
Income from continuing operations before taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates$2,018
 $771
 $187
Add: Net equity earnings in affiliates39
 71
 36
Less: Income from continuing operations before taxes, attributable to noncontrolling interests(509) (521) (354)
Pre-tax contribution1,548
 321
 (131)
Unrealized derivative losses (gains)33
 (3) (9)
Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)51
 (59) 22
Disposition/acquisition losses (gains)(934) 123
 6
Impairment expense307
 542
 933
Loss on extinguishment of debt180
 62
 29
Restructuring costs
 31
 
Total Adjusted PTC$1,185
 $1,017
 $850
177 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

 Total Adjusted PTC
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
US and Utilities SBU$511
 $424
 $392
South America SBU519
 446
 428
MCAC SBU300
 277
 222
Eurasia SBU222
 290
 283
Corporate, Other and Eliminations(367) (420) (475)
Total Adjusted PTC$1,185
 $1,017
 $850

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

 Total Assets Depreciation and Amortization Capital Expenditures
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
US and Utilities SBU$12,286
 $11,548
 $10,815
 $449
 $487
 $519
 $1,373
 $905
 $858
South America SBU10,941
 11,126
 10,487
 300
 301
 251
 662
 477
 569
MCAC SBU4,462
 4,087
 3,680
 141
 122
 117
 302
 435
 431
Eurasia SBU4,538
 6,002
 5,777
 99
 127
 149
 51

211

279
Discontinued operations
 86
 4,936
 
 123
 128
 
 315
 303
Corporate, Other and Eliminations294
 263
 429
 14
 9
 12
 8
 13
 18
Total$32,521
 $33,112
 $36,124
 $1,003
 $1,169
 $1,176
 $2,396
 $2,356
 $2,458

 Interest Income Interest Expense
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
US and Utilities SBU$10
 $5
 $4
 $287
 $315
 $299
South America SBU92
 95
 95
 283
 297
 247
MCAC SBU20
 13
 7
 124
 111
 100
Eurasia SBU186
 130
 139
 145
 167
 179
Corporate, Other and Eliminations2
 1
 
 217
 280
 309
Total$310
 $244
 $245
 $1,056
 $1,170
 $1,134
 Investments in and Advances to Affiliates Net Equity in Earnings of Affiliates
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016
US and Utilities SBU$538
 $535
 $23
 $35
 $41
 $9
South America SBU213
 358
 363
 15
 28
 15
MCAC SBU5
 (5) (1) (7) (4) (2)
Eurasia SBU293
 307
 236
 14
 9
 13
Corporate, Other and Eliminations65
 2
 
 (18) (3) 1
Total$1,114
 $1,197
 $621
 $39
 $71
 $36

The following table presents information, by country, about the Company's consolidated operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, and as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 (in millions). Revenue is recorded in the country in which it is earned and assets are recorded in the country in which they are located.
 Total Revenue Property, Plant & Equipment, net
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016 2018 2017
United States (1)
$3,462
 $3,487
 $3,790
 $8,731
 $7,968
Non-U.S.:         
Chile2,087
 1,944
 1,707
 5,453
 5,066
Dominican Republic884
 826
 614
 903
 935
El Salvador768
 686
 601
 334
 340
Brazil527
 541
 450
 1,287
 1,286
Argentina487
 435
 359
 234
 223
Panama438
 338
 312
 1,777
 1,615
Colombia428
 332
 437
 302
 332
Bulgaria426
 367
 334
 1,183
 1,290
Mexico399
 352
 342
 666
 687
United Kingdom390
 328
 337
 90
 108
Vietnam (2)
245
 278
 340
 2
 2
Jordan95
 95
 136
 418
 431
Philippines (3)
93
 449
 401
 
 
Kazakhstan
 67
 103
 
 
Other Non-U.S.7
 5
 18
 16
 13
Total Non-U.S.7,274
 7,043
 6,491
 12,665
 12,328
Total$10,736
 $10,530
 $10,281
 $21,396
 $20,296

Total Revenue
Long-Lived Assets (1)
Year Ended December 31,20212020201920212020
United States (2)
$3,531 $3,243 $3,230 $11,034 $10,360 
Non-U.S.:
Chile2,297 2,092 1,839 2,241 5,831 
Dominican Republic1,087 896 877 892 843 
El Salvador792 666 824 371 361 
Bulgaria700 444 459 1,020 1,149 
Panama595 519 601 1,907 1,939 
Brazil471 401 525 1,215 1,091 
Mexico471 349 402 614 623 
Argentina390 308 373 470 484 
Colombia383 358 472 349 355 
Vietnam (3)
320 285 343 — — 
Jordan98 96 95 42 44 
United Kingdom (4)
— — 147 — — 
Other Non-U.S.28 23 
Total Non-U.S.7,610 6,417 6,959 9,149 12,743 
Total$11,141 $9,660 $10,189 $20,183 $23,103 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)     For purposes of this disclosure, long-lived assets implies hard assets that cannot be readily removed, and thus excludes intangibles. Long-lived assets disclosed above include amounts recorded in Property, plant and equipment, net and right-of-use assets for operating leases recorded in Other noncurrent assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Includes Puerto Rico revenues of $257 million, $247 million and $301 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and property, plant & equipment of $553 million and $565 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(2)
The Mong Duong II power project is operated under a build, operate and transfer contract. Future expected payments for the construction performance obligation are recognized in Loan receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 18—Revenuefor further information.
(3)
The Masinloc property, plant and equipment was classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2017, and deconsolidated upon completion of the sale in March 2018. See Note 23—Held-For-Sale and Dispositions for further information.

(2)     Includes Puerto Rico revenues of $311 million, $298 million, and $294 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, and long-lived assets of $79 million and $533 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
THE AES CORPORATION(3)     Mong Duong assets were classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. See Notes 20—Revenue and 24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositionsfor further information.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)(4)     The Kilroot and Ballylumford long-lived assets were deconsolidated upon completion of the sale in June 2019. See Note 24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

16.19. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
RESTRICTED STOCK
Restricted Stock Units — The Company issues RSUs under its long-term compensation plan. The RSUs are generally granted based upon a percentage of the participant's base salary. The units have a three-year vesting schedule and vest in one-third increments over the three-year period. In all circumstances, RSUs granted by AES do not entitle the holder the right, or obligate AES, to settle the RSU in cash or other assets of AES.
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, RSUs issued had a grant date fair value equal to the closing price of the Company's stock on the grant date. The Company does not discount the grant date fair values to reflect any post-vesting restrictions. RSUs granted to employees during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 20162019 had grant date weighted average fair values per RSU of $10.55, $11.93$26.46, $20.75, and $9.42,$17.53, respectively.
The 2021 RSUs awarded to certain executives have a performance condition related to the achievement of environmental, social and governance goals for the three-year period ended December 31, 2023. This performance condition can cause the number of units that vest to increase or decrease by up to 15% of the total units for all three years. The adjustment will be reflected in the number of units that vest at the end of the three years.
The following table summarizes the components of the Company's stock-based compensation related to its employee RSUs recognized in the Company's consolidated financial statements (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017 2016December 31,202120202019
RSU expense before income tax $11
 $17
 $14
RSU expense before income tax$12 $10 $10 
Tax benefit (2) (4) (4)Tax benefit(2)(2)(1)
RSU expense, net of tax $9
 $13
 $10
RSU expense, net of tax$10 $$
Total value of RSUs converted (1)
 $10
 $10
 $7
Total value of RSUs converted (1)
$13 $11 $12 
Total fair value of RSUs vested $16
 $15
 $13
Total fair value of RSUs vested$10 $10 $10 
_____________________________


(1)
Amount represents fair market value on the date of conversion.178 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(1)Amount represents fair market value on the date of conversion.
Cash was not used to settle RSUs or compensation cost capitalized as part of the cost of an asset for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016.2019. As of December 31, 2018,2021, total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs of $10$26 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.72.75 years. There were no modifications to RSU awards during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.
A summary of the activity of RSUs for the year ended December 31, 20182021 follows (RSUs in thousands):
  RSUs Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Values Weighted Average Remaining Vesting Term
Nonvested at December 31, 2017 2,966
 $11.02
  
Vested (1,428) 11.05
  
Forfeited and expired (528) 10.95
  
Granted 913
 10.55
  
Nonvested at December 31, 2018 1,923
 $10.80
 1.4
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2018 1,782
 $10.79
  

RSUsWeighted Average Grant Date Fair ValuesWeighted Average Remaining Vesting Term
Nonvested at December 31, 20201,210 $17.53 
Vested(634)15.63 
Forfeited and expired(109)23.46 
Granted1,091 26.46 
Nonvested at December 31, 20211,558 $24.14 2.29
Expected to vest at December 31, 20211,420 $24.10 
The Company initially recognizes compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. In 2018,2021, AES has estimated a weighted average forfeiture rate of 9.35%5.3% for RSUs granted in 2018.2021. This estimate will be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments forfeited is likely to differ from previous estimates. Based on the estimated forfeiture rate, the Company expects to expense $9$27 million on a straight-line basis over a three-year period.weighted average period of 3.4 years.
The following table summarizes the RSUs that vested and were converted during the periods indicated (RSUs in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016
RSUs vested during the year 1,428
 1,337
 1,063
RSUs converted during the year, net of shares withheld for taxes 950
 865
 705
Shares withheld for taxes 478
 472
 358

Year Ended December 31,202120202019
RSUs vested during the year634 806 996 
RSUs converted during the year, net of shares withheld for taxes452 547 666 
Shares withheld for taxes182 259 329 
OTHER SHARE BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has three other share-based award programs. The Company has recorded expenses of $20$14 million, $8$21 million, and $10$22 million for 2018, 20172021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively, related to these programs.
Stock options — AES grants options to purchase shares of common stock under stock option plans to non-employee directors. Under the terms of the plans, the Company may issue options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at a price equal to 100% of the market price at the date the option is granted. Stock options issued in 20172019, 2020, and 20182021 have a three-year vesting schedule and vest in one-third increments over the

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

three-year period. The stock options have a contractual term of 10 years. In all circumstances, stock options granted by AES do not entitle the holder the right, or obligate AES, to settle the stock option in cash or other assets of AES.
Performance Stock Units — In 2016, 20172019, 2020, and 2018,2021, the Company issued PSUs to officers under its long-term compensation plan. PSUs are stock units which include performance conditions. Performance conditions are based on the Company's Proportional Free Cash Flow targets for 2016, 20172019. For 2020 and 2018.2021, performance conditions are based on the Company’s Parent Free Cash Flow target. The performance conditions determine the vesting and final share equivalent per PSU and can result in earning an award payout range of 0% to 200%, depending on the achievement. The Company believes that it is probable that the performance condition will be met and will continue to be evaluated throughout the performance period. In all circumstances, PSUs granted by AES do not entitle the holder the right, or obligate AES, to settle the stock units in cash or other assets of AES.
Performance Cash Units — In 2016, 20172019, 2020, and 2018,2021, the Company issued PCUs to its officers under its long-term compensation plan. The value of thesethe 2019 units is dependent on the market condition of total stockholder return on AES common stock as compared to the total stockholder return of the Standard and Poor's 500 Utilities Sector Index, Standard and Poor's 500 Index, and MSCI Emerging Market Index over a three-year measurement period. The value for the 2020 and 2021 units is dependent on the market condition of total stockholder return on AES common stock as compared to the total stockholder return of the Standard and Poor's 500 Utilities Sector Index, Standard and Poor's 500 Index, and MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Index over a three-year measurement period. Since PCUs are settled in cash, they qualify for liability accounting and periodic measurement is required.
17. REDEEMABLE STOCK OF SUBSIDIARIES
The following table is a reconciliation of changes in redeemable stock of subsidiaries (in millions):
December 31,2018 2017
Balance at the beginning of the period$837
 $782
Contributions from holders of redeemable stock of subsidiaries34
 50
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries2
 (14)
Fair value adjustment 
4
 25
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to redeemable stock of subsidiaries2
 (2)
Acquisition and reclassification of stock of subsidiaries
 (4)
Balance at the end of the period$879
 $837

The following table summarizes the Company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated (in millions):

December 31,2018 2017
IPALCO common stock$618
 $618
Colon quotas (1)
201
 159
IPL preferred stock60
 60
Total redeemable stock of subsidiaries$879
 $837

 _____________________________
(1)
Characteristics of quotas are similar179 | Notes to common stock.Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Colon — Our partner in Colon made capital contributions of $34 million and $50 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner, or measure the investment at fair value, will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable.
IPL
— IPL had $60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, which represent five series of preferred stock. The total annual dividend requirements were approximately $3 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017. Certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $100 and $118 per share. Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of IPL's board of directors if IPL has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters. Based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of IPL's board of directors in this circumstance, the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity.
IPALCO — As part of a purchase agreement executed in 2014, CDPQ had an option to invest $349 million in IPALCO through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% equity stake. In March 2016, CDPQ exercised the remaining option by investing $134 million in IPALCO, which resulted in CDPQ's combined direct and indirect interest in IPALCO of 30%. The Company recognized an increase to additional paid-in-capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value. In June 2016, CDPQ contributed an additional $24 million to IPALCO, with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment. Any subsequent

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to CDPQ will be classified as NCI within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable.
18.20. REVENUE
The following table presents our revenue from contracts with customers and other revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018periods indicated (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2021
US and Utilities SBUSouth America SBUMCAC SBUEurasia SBUCorporate, Other and EliminationsTotal
Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers$2,831 $— $— $— $— $2,831 
Other regulated revenue37 — — — — 37 
Total regulated revenue2,868 — — — — 2,868 
Non-Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers1,132 3,531 2,057 881 (15)7,586 
Other non-regulated revenue (1)
335 10 100 242 — 687 
Total non-regulated revenue1,467 3,541 2,157 1,123 (15)8,273 
Total revenue$4,335 $3,541 $2,157 $1,123 $(15)$11,141 
Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2020
US and Utilities SBU South America SBU MCAC SBU Eurasia SBU Corporate, Other and Eliminations TotalUS and Utilities SBUSouth America SBUMCAC SBUEurasia SBUCorporate, Other and EliminationsTotal
Regulated Revenue           Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers$2,885
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $2,885
Revenue from contracts with customers$2,626 $— $— $— $— $2,626 
Other regulated revenue54
 
 
 
 
 54
Other regulated revenue35 — — — — 35 
Total regulated revenue$2,939
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $2,939
Total regulated revenue2,661 — $— — — 2,661 
Non-Regulated Revenue           Non-Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers$972
 $3,529
 $1,642
 $943
 $(11) $7,075
Revenue from contracts with customers1,015 3,151 1,668 594 (10)6,418 
Other non-regulated revenue (1)
319
 4
 86
 312
 1
 722
Other non-regulated revenue (1)
242 98 234 (1)581 
Total non-regulated revenue$1,291
 $3,533
 $1,728
 $1,255
 $(10) $7,797
Total non-regulated revenue1,257 3,159 1,766 828 (11)6,999 
Total revenue$4,230
 $3,533
 $1,728
 $1,255
 $(10) $10,736
Total revenue$3,918 $3,159 $1,766 $828 $(11)$9,660 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
US and Utilities SBUSouth America SBUMCAC SBUEurasia SBUCorporate, Other and EliminationsTotal
Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers$2,979 $— $— $— $— $2,979 
Other regulated revenue49 — — — — 49 
Total regulated revenue3,028 — — — — 3,028 
Non-Regulated Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers767 3,205 1,788 799 (4)6,555 
Other non-regulated revenue (1)
263 94 248 (2)606 
Total non-regulated revenue1,030 3,208 1,882 1,047 (6)7,161 
Total revenue$4,058 $3,208 $1,882 $1,047 $(6)$10,189 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)Other non-regulated revenue primarily includes lease and derivative revenue not accounted for under ASC 606.
Other non-regulated revenue primarily includes lease and derivative revenue not accounted for under ASC 606.
Contract Balances — The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in accounts receivable and contract liabilities. Accounts receivable represent unconditional rights to consideration and consist of both billed amounts and unbilled amounts typically resulting from sales under long-term contracts when revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer. We bill both generation and utilities customers on a contractually agreed-upon schedule, typically at periodic intervals (e.g., monthly). The calculation of revenue earned but not yet billed is based on the number of days not billed in the month, the estimated amount of energy delivered during those days and the estimated average price per customer class for that month.
Our contract liabilities consist of deferred revenue which is classified as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to recognize revenue. The current portion of our contract liabilities is reported in Accrued and other liabilities and the noncurrent portion is reported in Other noncurrent liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The contract liabilities from contracts with customers were $109$216 million and $131$531 million as of December 31, 20182021 and January 1, 2018,December 31, 2020, respectively.
OfDuring the $131 million of contract liabilities reported at January 1, 2018, $36 million was recognized as revenue during the periodyears ended December 31, 2018.2021 and 2020, we recognized revenue of $410 million and $14 million, respectively, that was included in the corresponding contract liability balance at the beginning of the periods.
In August 2020, AES Andes reached an agreement with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence to early terminate two PPAs of the Angamos coal-fired plant in Chile, further accelerating AES Andes' decarbonization strategy. As a result of the termination payment, Angamos recognized a contract liability of $655 million, of which $55 million was derecognized each month through the end of the remaining performance obligation in August 2021.
A significant financing arrangement exists for our Mong Duong plant in Vietnam. The plant was constructed under a build, operate, and transferBOT contract and will be transferred to the Vietnamese government after the completion of a 25 year PPA. The performance obligation to construct the facility was substantially completed in 2015. Approximately $1.4 billion of contractContract consideration related to the construction, but not yet collected through the 25 year PPA, was reflected as a loan receivable ason the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2018.2021 and December 31, 2020, Mong Duong met the held-for-sale criteria and


180 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

the loan receivable balance of $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, net of CECL reserve of $30 million and $32 million, respectively, was reclassified to held-for-sale assets. Of the loan receivable balance, $91 million and $80 million was classified as Current held-for-sale assets, and $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion was classified as Noncurrent held-for-sale assets, respectively.
Remaining Performance Obligations — The transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations represents future consideration for unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) performance obligations at the end of the reporting period. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $15$9 million, primarily consisting of fixed consideration for the sale of renewable energy credits (RECs) in long-term contracts in the U.S. We expect to recognize revenue on approximately one-fifth of the remaining performance obligations in 2019,2022 and 2023, with the remainder recognized thereafter. The Company has elected to apply the optional disclosure exemptions under ASC 606. Therefore, the amount above excludes contracts with an original length of one year or less, contracts for which we recognize revenue based on the amount we have the right to invoice for services performed, and variable consideration allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation when the consideration relates specifically to our efforts to satisfy the performance obligation and depicts the amount to which we expect to be entitled. As such, consideration for energy is excluded from the amounts above as the variable consideration relates to the amount of energy delivered and reflects the value the Company expects to receive for the energy transferred. Estimates of revenue expected to be recognized in future periods also exclude unexercised customer options to purchase additional goods or services that do not represent material rights to the customer.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

19.21. OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE
Other Income Other income generally includes gains on insurance recoveries in excess of property damage, gains on asset sales and liability extinguishments, favorable judgments on contingencies, gains on contract terminations, allowance for funds used during construction, and other income from miscellaneous transactions. The components are summarized as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
Gain on remeasurement of contingent consideration (1)
$32
 $
 $
Allowance for funds used during construction (US Utilities)8
 26
 29
Gain on sale of assets4
 1
 4
Legal settlements (2)

 60
 
Other28
 33
 31
Total other income$72
 $120
 $64

_____________________________
(1)
Related to the amendment of the Oahu purchase agreement. See Note 24 —Acquisitions for further information.
(2)
In December 2016, the Company and YPF entered into a settlement in which all parties agreed to give up any and all legal action related to gas supply contracts that were terminated in 2008 and have been in dispute since 2009. In January 2017, the YPF board approved the agreement and paid the Company $60 million, thereby resolving all uncertainties around the dispute.
Other Expense Other expense generally includes losses on asset sales and dispositions, losses on legal contingencies, defined benefit plan non-service costs, and losses from other miscellaneous transactions. The components are summarized as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Other Income
Gain on remeasurement to acquisition-date fair value (1)
$254 $— $— 
Legal settlements (2)
53 — — 
Gain on remeasurement of contingent consideration (3)
28 — — 
Gain on sale of assets (4)
24 46 — 
Gain on pension curtailment11 — — 
Non-service pension income10 — — 
AFUDC (US Utilities)
Gain on insurance proceeds (5)
— — 118 
Other22 24 24 
Total other income$410 $75 $145 
Other Expense
Loss on sale and disposal of assets (6)
$14 $$22 
Loss on commencement of sales-type leases (7)
13 — 36 
Loss on sale of receivables (8)
20 — 
Legal contingencies and settlements15 
Non-service pension and other postretirement costs— 17 
Other22 
Total other expense$60 $53 $80 
_____________________________
(1)Primarily related to the remeasurement of our existing equity interest in sPower’s development platform as part of the step acquisition to form AES Clean Energy Development. See Note 25—Acquisitions for further information.
(2)Primarily related to settlement of legal arbitration at Alto Maipo.
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
Loss on sale and disposal of assets (1)
$30
 $28
 $12
Non-service pension and other postretirement costs10
 1
 3
Allowance for other receivables (2)
7
 
 52
Water rights write-off
 19
 6
Other11
 10
 7
Total other expense$58
 $58
 $80
(3)Primarily related to the remeasurement of contingent consideration on the Great Cove Solar acquisition at Clean Energy See Note 25—Acquisitions for further information.
(4)For the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily associated with the gain on sale of Redondo Beach land at Southland. See Note 24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
(5)Associated with recoveries for property damage at the Andres facility in the Dominican Republic from a lightning incident in September 2018 and the upgrade of the tunnel lining at Changuinola.
(6)For the year ended December 31, 2019, associated with a loss due to the upgrade of the tunnel lining at Changuinola.
(7)Related to losses recognized at commencement of sales-type leases at AES Renewable Holdings. See Note 14—Leases for further information.
(8)Associated with a loss on sale of Stabilization Fund receivables at AES Andes. See Note 7—Financing Receivables for further information.

 _____________________________


(1)
In September 2018, the Company recorded a $20 million loss due181 | Notes to damage associated with a lightning incident at the Andres facility in the Dominican Republic.Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
(2)
During the fourth quarter of 2016, we recognized a full allowance on a non-trade receivable in the MCAC SBU as a result of payment delays and discussions with the counterparty. The allowance was related to certain reimbursements the Company was expecting in connection with a legal matter.


20.22. ASSET IMPAIRMENT EXPENSE
Year ended December 31, (in millions) 2018 2017 2016
Shady Point $157
 $
 $
Nejapa 37
 
 
DPL 
 175
 859
Laurel Mountain 
 121
 
Kazakhstan Hydroelectric 
 92
 
Kazakhstan CHPs 
 94
 
Kilroot 
 37
 
Buffalo Gap II 
 
 159
Buffalo Gap I 
 
 77
Other 14
 18
 1
Total $208
 $537
 $1,096

Year ended December 31, (in millions)202120202019
Ventanas 3 & 4$649 $— $— 
Puerto Rico475 — — 
Angamos155 564 — 
Buffalo Gap III91 — — 
Buffalo Gap II73 — — 
Mountain View I & II67 — — 
Buffalo Gap I29 — — 
Estrella del Mar I11 30 — 
Ventanas 1 & 2— 213 — 
Hawaii— 38 60 
Kilroot and Ballylumford— — 115 
Other25 19 10 
Total$1,575 $864 $185 
Shady PointBuffalo Gap In December 2018, During the Company entered intofourth quarter of 2021, due to an agreement to sell Shady Point, a coal-fired generation facilityexpired PPA and volatile spot prices in the U.S. Due first toERCOT market, management concluded that the uncertainty around future cash flows,carrying value of the long-lived assets of Buffalo Gap I, II, and then upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria,III wind generation facilities may not be recoverable. As such, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the fair value of the Shady Pointeach asset group, inusing the second, thirdincome approach, was zero for Buffalo Gap I, II and fourth quarter of 2018, resulting inIII. As a result, the recognition of totalCompany recognized pre-tax asset impairment expense of $157$29 million, for the year ended December 31, 2018. Using the market approach, the asset group was determined to have a fair value of $30 $73 million, as of December 31, 2018. The sale is subject to regulatory approval and is expected to close during the second half of 2019. See Note 23—Held-for-Sale$91 million at Buffalo Gap I, II, and Dispositions for further information. Shady PointIII, respectively. Buffalo Gap is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
NejapaVentanas and AngamosIn August 2020, AES Andes reached an agreement with Minera Escondida and Minera Spence to early terminate two PPAs of the Angamos coal-fired plant in Chile, further accelerating AES Andes’ decarbonization strategy. AES Andes also announced its intention to accelerate the retirement of the Ventanas 1 and Ventanas 2 coal-fired plants. Management will no longer be pursuing a contracting strategy for these assets and the plants will primarily be utilized as peaker plants and for grid stability. Due to these developments, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying amounts of these asset groups were not recoverable. The Angamos asset group was determined to have a fair value of $306 million, using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized pre-tax asset impairment expense of $564 million and $213 million at Angamos and Ventanas 1 & 2, respectively.
In July 2021, AES Andes entered into an agreement committing to accelerate the retirement of the Ventanas 3, Ventanas 4, Angamos 1, and Angamos 2 coal-fired plants in Chile. Due to these strategic developments, the Company performed impairment analyses as of June 30, 2021, and determined that the carrying amounts of the asset groups were not recoverable. The Ventanas 3 & 4 and Angamos asset groups were determined to have fair values of $12 million and $86 million, respectively, using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized pre-tax asset impairment expense of $649 million and $155 million, respectively. Ventanas and Angamos are reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Mountain View I & IIIn April 2021, the Company approved plans to execute a repowering project for the Mountain View I & II wind facility and signed two new PPAs for the energy and capacity related to the repowered asset. As the repowering will result in decommissioning the majority of the existing wind turbines in advance of their depreciable lives, the execution of the new PPAs was identified as an impairment indicator. The asset group was determined to have a fair value of $11 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized pre-tax asset impairment expense of $67 million. Mountain View I & II is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Puerto Rico — New factors arose in the first quarter of 2021 associated with the economic costs and operational and reputational risks of disposal of coal combustion residuals off island. In addition, new legislative initiatives surrounding the prohibition of coal generation assets in Puerto Rico were introduced. Collectively, these factors along with management’s decision on how to best achieve our stated decarbonization goals resulted in an indicator of impairment at our asset group in Puerto Rico. As such, management performed a recoverability test in accordance with ASC 360 and concluded that Puerto Rico’s undiscounted cash flows did not exceed the carrying value of the asset group. The fair value of the asset group was determined to be $73 million, resulting in pre-tax impairment expense of $475 million. Puerto Rico is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Estrella del Mar I — In August 2020, the Estrella del Mar I power barge was disconnected from the Panama grid. Upon disconnection, the Company concluded that the barge was no longer part of the AES Panama asset


182 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

group and performed an impairment analysis. The Company determined that the carrying amount of the asset was not recoverable and recognized asset impairment expense of $30 million. In September 2021, the Company recognized additional asset impairment expense of $11 million due to a change in the estimated market value of the power barge. See Note 24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information. Estrella del Mar I is reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Hawaii — During the fourth quarter of 2018,2019, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Nejapa, a landfill gas plantcoal-fired asset in El Salvador. Decreased production as a resultHawaii. Uncertainty around the ability to contract the asset upon expiration of its existing PPA resulted in management's decision to reassess the economic useful life of the landfill owner´s failure to perform improvements necessary to continue extracting gas fromgeneration facility. A decrease in the landfilluseful life was identified as an impairment indicator. Theindicator and the Company determined that the carrying amount was not recoverable. The asset group, consisting of property, plant

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

and equipment and intangible assets, was determined to have a fair value of $5$103 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized an asset impairment expense of $37$60 million as of December 31, 2018. Nejapa is reported2019.
In July 2020, the Hawaii State Legislature passed Senate Bill 2629 which will prohibit AES Hawaii from generating electricity from coal after December 31, 2022. Therefore, management further reassessed the economic useful life of the generation facility and a decrease in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
DPL — In March 2017, the Board of Directors of DPL approved the retirement of the DPL operated and co-owned Stuart coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units, and the Killen coal-fired generating unit and combustion turbine on or before June 1, 2018.useful life was identified as an impairment indicator. The Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying amountsamount of the facilities wereasset group was not recoverable. The Stuart and Killen asset groups were determined to have fair values of $3 million and $8 million, respectively, using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized totaladditional asset impairment expense of $66 million.$38 million during the third quarter of 2020. The Stuart and Killen units were retiredCompany announced in May 2018. PriorNovember 2020 its intention to their retirement, Stuart and Killen wereretire the generation facility in 2022. Hawaii is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Kilroot and Ballylumford — In December 2017, DPLApril 2019, the Company entered into an agreement forto sell its entire 100% interest in the sale of six of its combustion turbineKilroot coal and diesel-fired generation facilitiesoil-fired plant and related assets ("DPL peaker assets").energy storage facility and the Ballylumford gas-fired plant in the United Kingdom. Upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying value of the asset group of $346$232 million was greater than its fair value less costs to sell of $237$114 million. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $109$115 million. DPLThe Company completed the sale of the peaker assetsKilroot and Ballylumford in March 2018.June 2019. See Note 24Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information. Prior to their sale, the DPL peaker assets were reported in the USKilroot and Utilities SBU reportable segment. See Note 23—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived generation assets at DPL. Uncertainty created by the Supreme Court of Ohio’s June 20, 2016 opinion regarding ESP 2, lower expectations of future revenue resulting from the most recent PJM capacity auction and higher anticipated environmental compliance costs resulting from third party studies were collectively determined to be an impairment indicator for these assets. The Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying amount of Killen, a coal-fired generation facility, and certain DPL peaking generation facilities were not recoverable. The Killen and DPL peaking generation asset groups were determined to have a fair value of $84 million and $5 million, respectively, using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized total asset impairment expense of $235 million. DPL is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived coal-fired generation assets and one gas-fired peaking plant at DPL. Uncertainty around the useful life of Stuart and Killen related to the Company’s ESP proceedings and lower forward dark spreads and capacity prices were collectively determined to be an impairment indicator for these assets. Market information indicating a significant decrease in the fair value of Zimmer and Miami Fort was determined to be an indicator of impairment for these assets. The lower forward dark spreads and capacity prices, along with the indicators at the other coal-fired facilities, collectively, resulted in an indicator of impairment for the Conesville asset group. For the gas-fired peaking plant, significant incremental capital expenditures relative to its fair value, and an impairment charge taken at this facility in the second quarter of 2016, were collectively determined to be impairment indicators for this asset. The Company performed an impairment analysis for each of these asset groups and determined that their carrying amounts were not recoverable. The Stuart, Killen, Miami Fort, Zimmer, Conesville and the gas-fired peaking plant asset groups were determined to have fair values of $57 million, $43 million, $36 million, $24 million, $1 million and $2 million, respectively, using the market approach for Miami Fort and Zimmer and the income approach for the remaining asset groups. As a result, the Company recognized total asset impairment expense of $624 million. DPL is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Laurel Mountain — During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Laurel Mountain, a wind farm in the U.S. Impairment indicators were identified based on a decline in forward pricing. The Company determined that the carrying amount was not recoverable. The Laurel Mountain asset group was determined to have a fair value of $33 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized an asset impairment expense of $121 million. Laurel Mountain is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Kilroot — During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Kilroot, a coal and oil-fired plant in Northern Ireland, as Kilroot was not successful in bidding its coal units into the December 2017 capacity auction for the newly implemented I-SEM market. The Company determined that the carrying amount of the asset group was not recoverable. The Kilroot asset group was determined to have a fair value of $20 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized an asset impairment expense

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

of $37 million, which was limited to the carrying value of the coal units. Kilroot is reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Kazakhstan Hydroelectric — In April 2017, the Republic of Kazakhstan stated the concession agreements would not be extended for Shulbinsk HPP and Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP, two hydroelectric plants in Kazakhstan, and initiated the process to transfer these plants back to the government. Upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria in the second quarter of 2017, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined the carrying value of the asset group of $190 million, which included cumulative translation losses of $100 million, was greater than its fair value less costs to sell of $92 million. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $92 million limited to the carrying value of the long-lived assets. The Company completed the transfer of the plants in October 2017. Prior to their transfer, the Kazakhstan hydroelectric plantsBallylumford were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 23—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
Kazakhstan CHPs — In January 2017, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of Ust-Kamenogorsk CHP and Sogrinsk CHP, its combined heating and power coal plants in Kazakhstan. Upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria in the first quarter of 2017, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that the carrying value of the asset group of $171 million, which included cumulative translation losses of $92 million, was greater than its fair value less costs to sell of $29 million. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $94 million limited to the carrying value of the long-lived assets. The Company completed the sale of its interest in the Kazakhstan CHP plants in April 2017. Prior to their sale, the plants were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 23—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions for further information.
Buffalo Gap I — During 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Buffalo Gap I. Low wind production during 2016 resulted in management lowering future expectations of production and therefore future forecasted revenues. As such this was determined to be an impairment indicator. The Company determined that the carrying amount of the asset group was not recoverable. The Buffalo Gap I asset group was determined to have a fair value of $36 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $77 million ($23 million attributable to AES). Buffalo Gap I is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Buffalo Gap II — During 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Buffalo Gap II. Impairment indicators were identified based on a decline in forward power curves. The Company determined that the carrying amount was not recoverable. The Buffalo Gap II asset group was determined to have a fair value of $92 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized asset impairment expense of $159 million ($49 million attributable to AES). Buffalo Gap II is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
21.23. INCOME TAXES
U.S. Tax Reform — In 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”). The TCJA significantly changed U.S. corporate income tax law. Among other changes effective in 2017, the TCJA required companies to pay a one-time tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. Many other changes took effect in 2018, including a limit on the deductibility of interest expense and a new regime for taxing certain earnings of foreign subsidiaries.
The Company recognized the income tax effects of the TCJA in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) which provides SEC guidance on the application of ASC 740, Income Taxes, in the reporting period in which the TCJA was signed into law. Accordingly, the Company’s 2017 financial statements reflected provisional amounts for those impacts for which the accounting under ASC 740 was incomplete, but a reasonable estimate could be determined. As of December 31, 2018, the Company's accounting for the initial impacts of the TCJA are complete under SAB 118.
For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company increased its estimate of the one-time transition tax by $194 million to $869 million. The estimated tax expense recognized for the year ended December 31, 2017 relating to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities from an income tax rate of 35% to 21%, decreased $77 million, resulting in a total remeasurement benefit of $38 million.
Argentine Tax Reform — In December 2017, the Argentine government enacted reforms to its income tax laws that resulted in a decrease to statutory income tax rates for our Argentine businesses from 35% to 30% in 2018-2019 and to 25% for 2020 and future years. The impact of remeasuring deferred taxes to account for the enacted change in future applicable income tax rates was recognized as income tax benefit in the fourth quarter

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

of 2017, resulting in a decrease of $21 million to consolidated income tax expense.
Chilean Tax Reform — In February 2016, the Chilean government enacted further reforms to its income tax laws that resulted in an increase to statutory income tax rates for most of our Chilean businesses from 25% to 25.5% in 2017 and to 27% for 2018 and future years. The impact of remeasuring deferred taxes to account for the enacted change in future applicable income tax rates was recognized as a discrete income tax expense in the first quarter of 2016, resulting in an increase of $26 million to consolidated income tax expense.
Income Tax Provision — The following table summarizes the expense for income taxes on continuing operations for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017 2016
Federal:Current$7
 $
 $2
 Deferred186
 545
 (361)
State:Current2
 
 1
 Deferred5
 1
 (4)
Foreign:Current378
 335
 318
 Deferred130
 109
 76
Total $708
 $990
 $32

December 31,202120202019
Federal:Current$(2)$(8)$(7)
Deferred42 (17)(4)
State:Current— (1)
Deferred18 — 
Foreign:Current273 458 368 
Deferred(465)(219)(4)
Total$(133)$216 $352 
Effective and Statutory Rate Reconciliation — The following table summarizes a reconciliation of the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate as a percentage of income from continuing operations before taxes for the periods indicated:
December 31,202120202019
Statutory Federal tax rate21 %21 %21 %
State taxes, net of Federal tax benefit(6)%(6)%%
Taxes on foreign earnings(2)%15 %12 %
Valuation allowance%16 %(2)%
Uncertain tax positions16 %— %— %
Change in tax law(1)%%(1)%
U.S. Investment Tax Credit— %(8)%— %
Alto Maipo deconsolidation(17)%— %— %
Noncontrolling interest on Buffalo Gap impairments(3)%— %— %
Other—net(2)%%(1)%
Effective tax rate13 %44 %35 %
December 31, 2018 2017 2016
Statutory Federal tax rate 21 % 35 % 35 %
State taxes, net of Federal tax benefit 2 % (7)% (18)%
Taxes on foreign earnings 9 %  % (46)%
Valuation allowance (2)% 10 % 10 %
Uncertain tax positions  %  % 4 %
Noncontrolling Interest on Buffalo Gap impairments  %  % 31 %
Change in tax law 6 % 90 % 12 %
Other—net (1)%  % (11)%
Effective tax rate 35 % 128 % 17 %


183 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

For 2018,2021, included in the 6% change in tax law item relates primarily to changes in estimate under SAB 118 of the impacts of adoption of the TCJA. The Company recognized tax expense of $1947% for valuation allowance is approximately $93 million related to revised estimatesthe release of the one-time transition tax in accordance with proposed regulations issued by the U.S. Treasury in 2018. The adjustment was due in large part to the approach the proposed regulations adopted to determine the fair valuevaluation allowance at one of our interests in publicly tradedBrazilian subsidiaries. The Company also recognized tax benefit of $77 million related to revised estimates of deferred tax remeasurement. Included in the 9% taxes16% uncertain tax positions is approximately $176 million of income tax benefit related to effective settlement resulting from the exam closure of the Company’s U.S. 2017 tax return, the focus of which was on foreign earningsthe TCJA one-time transition tax. The (17)% included in the Alto Maipo deconsolidation item above primarily reflects the lack of tax benefit for approximately $775 million of the $2,074 million pretax Alto Maipo deconsolidation loss. Also included in this item is $124approximately $41 million of U.S. GILTItax benefit related to resulting tax over book outside basis difference in Alto Maipo, which is offset by $41 million of tax expense related to foreign subsidiaries, includingin the sale of our interest in Masinloc.
For 2017, the 90% change in tax law item relates primarily to the impact of U.S. and Argentina tax reform.valuation allowance line item. The impact of the U.S one-time transition tax and remeasurement of deferred taxes represents 88% and 5%, respectively, which is partially offset by the tax benefit resulting from Argentina tax reform representing 3%.
For 2016, the 31%(3)% Buffalo Gap impairments item relates to the amounts of impairment allocated to tax equity noncontrolling interest which are nondeductible.
For 2020, the 15% taxes on foreign earnings item includes $20 million of tax benefit associated with the Company's equity investment in Guacolda. Included in the 2020 (8)% U.S. investment tax credit is nondeductible.$35 million of benefit associated with the Na Pua Makani wind facility. Not included in the 2020 effective tax rate is $75 million of income tax expense recorded to additional paid-in-capital related to the Company's sale of 35% of its ownership interest in the Southland Energy assets. See Note 17—Equity for details of the sale.
For 2019, the 12% taxes on foreign earnings item includes $19 million of tax benefit associated with the Company's equity investment in Guacolda. Included in the 2019 change in tax law amount of (1)% are the downward adjustments to the U.S. one-time transition tax expense and deferred tax remeasurement benefit resulting from the issuance of the final regulations in 2019, offset by the impact of deferred tax remeasurement expense related to the December 2019 Argentina tax law change.
Income Tax Receivables and Payables — The current income taxes receivable and payable are included in Other Current Assetscurrent assets and Accrued and Other Liabilitiesother liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The noncurrent income taxes receivable and payable are included in Other Noncurrent Assetsnoncurrent assets and Other Noncurrent Liabilities,noncurrent liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes the income taxes receivable and payable as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017
Income taxes receivable—current $163
 $147
Income taxes receivable—noncurrent 8
 
Total income taxes receivable $171
 $147
Income taxes payable—current $210
 $129
Income taxes payable—noncurrent 7
 17
Total income taxes payable $217
 $146


THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

December 31,20212020
Income taxes receivable—current$184 $138 
Income taxes receivable—noncurrent
Total income taxes receivable$186 $147 
Income taxes payable—current$133 $284 
Income taxes payable—noncurrent— — 
Total income taxes payable$133 $284 
Deferred Income Taxes — Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and (b) operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. These items are stated at the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards for tax return purposes of approximately $1.1$1.9 billion, expiringof which approximately $540 million expire in years 20332034 to 2036.2036 and $1.4 billion carry forward indefinitely. The Company also had federal general business tax credit carryforwards of approximately $22$68 million, expiring primarily from 2021of which $14 million expire in years 2022 to 2038,2032 and federal alternative minimum tax credits of approximately $15$54 million that may be fully recovered by 2021 under the TCJA.expire in years 2035 to 2041. Additionally, the Company had state net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 20182021 of approximately $8.5$6.8 billion expiring primarily in years 20192022 to 2038.2040. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $2.4$1.2 billion that expire at various times beginning in 20192022 and some of which carry forward without expiration, and tax credits available in foreign jurisdictions of approximately $14$2 million, $13 million of which expire in 2021 and $1 million of which expire in years 2024 to 2029.primarily carry forward without expiration.
Valuation allowances decreased $120$106 million during 20182021 to $868$528 million at December 31, 2018.2021. This net decrease was primarily due to the release of valuation allowance at one of our Brazilian subsidiaries.
Valuation allowances decreased $190 million during 2020 to $634 million at December 31, 2020. This net decrease was primarily the result of valuation allowance activity atdue to the liquidation of certain of our Brazil subsidiaries and U.S. states.
Valuation allowances increased $112 million during 2017 to $988 million at December 31, 2017. Thisholding companies with net increase was primarily the result ofoperating losses with full valuation allowance activity at certain of our Brazil subsidiaries.allowances.
The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets as shown below will be realized when future taxable income is generated through the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and


184 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

income that is expected to be generated by businesses that have long-term contracts or a history of generating taxable income.
The following table summarizes deferred tax assets and liabilities, as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017
Differences between book and tax basis of property $(1,418) $(1,424)
Other taxable temporary differences (243) (143)
Total deferred tax liability (1,661) (1,567)
Operating loss carryforwards 1,066
 1,439
Capital loss carryforwards 52
 63
Bad debt and other book provisions 62
 66
Tax credit carryforwards 55
 51
Other deductible temporary differences 111
 60
Total gross deferred tax asset 1,346
 1,679
Less: valuation allowance (868) (988)
Total net deferred tax asset 478
 691
Net deferred tax (liability) $(1,183) $(876)

December 31,20212020
Differences between book and tax basis of property$(961)$(1,308)
Investment in U.S. tax partnerships(629)(332)
Other taxable temporary differences(418)(403)
Total deferred tax liability(2,008)(2,043)
Operating loss carryforwards979 1,156 
Capital loss carryforwards77 73 
Bad debt and other book provisions380 87 
Tax credit carryforwards68 78 
Other deductible temporary differences464 471 
Total gross deferred tax asset1,968 1,865 
Less: Valuation allowance(528)(634)
Total net deferred tax asset1,440 1,231 
Net deferred tax liability$(568)$(812)
The Company considers undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. Except for the one-time transition tax in the U.S., no taxes have been recorded with respect to our indefinitely reinvested earnings in accordance with the relevant accounting guidance for income taxes. Should the earnings be remitted as dividends, the Company may be subject to additional foreign withholding and state income taxes. Under the TCJA, future distributions from foreign subsidiaries will generally be subject to a federal dividends received deduction in the U.S. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the cumulative amount of U.S. GAAP foreign un-remitted earnings upon which additional income taxes have not been provided is approximately $4$3 billion. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of any additional taxes which may be payable on the undistributed earnings.
Income from operations in certain countries is subject to reduced tax rates as a result of satisfying specific commitments regarding employment and capital investment. The Company's income tax benefits related to the tax status of these operations are estimated to be $35$27 million, $26$33 million and $20$26 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The per share effect of these benefits after noncontrolling interests was $0.04,$0.02, $0.03 and $0.02 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Included in the Company's income tax benefits is the benefit related to our operations in Vietnam, which is estimated to be $19$16 million, $13$16 million and $15$13 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The per share effect of these benefits related to our operations in Vietnam after noncontrolling interest was $0.01, $0.01 and $0.01 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

The following table shows the income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes, net equity in earnings of affiliates and noncontrolling interests, for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017 2016
U.S. $(218) $(511) $(1,305)
Non-U.S. 2,236
 1,282
 1,492
Total $2,018
 $771
 $187

December 31,202120202019
U.S.$622 $(135)$(57)
Non-U.S.(1,686)623 1,058 
Total$(1,064)$488 $1,001 
Uncertain Tax Positions — Uncertain tax positions have been classified as noncurrent income tax liabilities unless they are expected to be paid within one year. The Company's policy for interest and penalties related to income tax exposures is to recognize interest and penalties as a component of the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table shows the total amount of gross accrued income taxes related to interest and penalties included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31, 2018 2017December 31,20212020
Interest related $4
 $7
Interest related$$
Penalties related 
 
Penalties related— 
The following table shows the expense/(benefit) related to interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,202120202019
Total benefit for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits$$— $(2)
Total expense for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits— — 
December 31, 2018 2017 2016
Total expense (benefit) for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits $(3) $1
 $2
Total expense for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits 
 
 


185 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

We are potentially subject to income tax audits in numerous jurisdictions in the U.S. and internationally until the applicable statute of limitations expires. Tax audits by their nature are often complex and can require several years to complete. The following is a summary of tax years potentially subject to examination in the significant tax and business jurisdictions in which we operate:
JurisdictionTax Years Subject to Examination
Argentina2012-20182015-2021
Brazil2013-20182016-2021
Chile2015-20182018-2021
Colombia2016-20182016-2021
Dominican Republic2016-20182019-2021
El Salvador2016-20182018-2021
Netherlands2014-20182015-2021
Panama2015-20182018-2021
United Kingdom2012-20182018-2021
United States (Federal)2015-20182017-2021

As of December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $463$122 million, $348$458 million and $352$465 million, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would benefit the effective tax rate as of December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 is $446$122 million, $332$439 million and $332$448 million, respectively, of which $4 million, $33 million, $29 million and $24$33 million, respectively, would be in the form of tax attributes that would warrant a full valuation allowance. Further, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefit that would benefit the effective tax rate as of 20182021 would be reduced by approximately $161$34 million of tax expense related to remeasurement from 35% to 21%.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits anticipated to result in a net decrease to unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of December 31, 20182021 is estimated to be between $0 millionzero and $10 million, primarily relating to statute of limitation lapses and tax exam settlements.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated (in millions):
202120202019
Balance at January 1$458 $465 $463 
Additions for current year tax positions28 — 
Additions for tax positions of prior years14 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years— (6)(5)
Settlements(377)— — 
Lapse of statute of limitations(1)(4)(3)
Balance at December 31$122 $458 $465 
  2018 2017 2016
Balance at January 1 $348
 $352
 $364
Additions for current year tax positions 2
 
 2
Additions for tax positions of prior years 146
 2
 1
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (26) (5) (1)
Settlements 
 
 (13)
Lapse of statute of limitations (7) (1) (1)
Balance at December 31 $463
 $348
 $352

The 2021 settlement amount of $377 million above primarily relates to effective settlement of historic unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the exam closure of the Company’s U.S. 2017 tax return, the focus of which was on the TCJA one-time transition tax assessed on cumulative foreign earnings and profits. This amount is based on the pre-TCJA income tax rate of 35% though the actual impact to the Company’s income tax expense is an income tax benefit computed at 21%.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years. The Company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits. However, audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty. It is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material, but cannot be estimated as of December 31, 2018.2021. Our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted.
22. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016, management decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in Brazil, Sul and Eletropaulo, to reduce the Company's exposure to the Brazilian distribution market. The disposals of Sul and Eletropaulo were completed in October 2016 and June 2018, respectively.
Eletropaulo — In November 2017, Eletropaulo converted its preferred shares into ordinary shares and transitioned the listing of those shares to the Novo Mercado, which is a listing segment of the Brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance. Upon conversion of the preferred shares into ordinary shares, AES no longer controlled Eletropaulo, but maintained significant influence over the business. As a result, the Company deconsolidated Eletropaulo. After deconsolidation, the Company's 17% ownership interest was reflected as an equity method investment. The Company recorded an after-tax loss on deconsolidation of $611 million, which primarily consisted of $455 million related to cumulative translation losses and $243 million related to pension losses reclassified from AOCL.
In December 2017, all the remaining criteria were met for Eletropaulo to qualify as a discontinued operation. Therefore, its results of operations and financial position were reported as such in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
In June 2018, the Company completed the sale of its entire 17% ownership interest in Eletropaulo through a bidding process hosted by the Brazilian securities regulator, CVM. Gross proceeds of $340 million were received at our subsidiary in Brazil, subject to the payment of taxes. Upon disposal of Eletropaulo, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain on sale of $243 million (after-tax $199 million).
Excluding the gain on sale, Eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to AES was immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2018. Eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to AES, including the loss on deconsolidation, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $633 million and $192 million, respectively. Prior to its classification as discontinued operations, Eletropaulo was reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Sul — The Company executed an agreement for the sale of Sul, a wholly-owned subsidiary, in June 2016. The results of operations and financial position of Sul are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria, the Company recognized an after-tax loss of $382 million comprised of a pre-tax impairment charge of $783 million, offset by a tax benefit of $266 million related to the impairment of the Sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in Sul. Prior to the impairment charge, the carrying value of the Sul asset group of $1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell. However, the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the Sul disposal group.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

On October 31, 2016, the Company completed the sale of Sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $484 million, excluding contingent consideration. Upon disposal of Sul, the Company incurred an additional after-tax loss on sale of $737 million. The cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $1.1 billion. This includes the reclassification of approximately $1 billion of cumulative translation losses resulting in a net reduction to the Company’s stockholders’ equity of $92 million.
Sul’s pre-tax loss attributable to AES for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1.4 billion. Prior to its classification as discontinued operations, Sul was reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Borsod — In 2011, Borsod, which held two coal and biomass-fired generation plants in Hungary, filed for liquidation and was deconsolidated with its historical operating results reflected in discontinued operations under prior accounting guidance. In October 2018, the liquidation was completed and the Company recognized a deferred gain of $26 million, primarily comprised of a $20 million write-off of cumulative translation balances. Prior to its liquidation, Borsod was reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations at December 31, 2017:

(in millions)December 31, 2017
Assets of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses: 
Investments in and advances to affiliates (1)
$86
Total assets of discontinued operations86
Other assets of businesses classified as held-for-sale (2)
1,948
Total assets of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses$2,034
Liabilities of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses: 
Other liabilities of businesses classified as held-for-sale (2)
1,033
Total liabilities of discontinued operations and held-for-sale businesses$1,033
_____________________________
(1)
Represents the Company's 17% ownership interest in Eletropaulo.
(2)
Masinloc, Eletrica Santiago, and the DPL peaker assets were classified as held-for-sale as of186 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2017. See Note 23—Held-for-Sale2021, 2020 and Dispositions for further information.
2019
Excluding the gain on sale of Eletropaulo and deferred gain on liquidation of Borsod, income from discontinued operations and cash flows from operating and investing activities of discontinued operations were immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The following table summarizes the major line items constituting losses from discontinued operations for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,2017 2016
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax:   
Revenue — regulated$3,320
 $4,036
Cost of sales(3,151) (3,954)
Other income and expense items that are not major (1)
(166) (160)
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued businesses3
 (78)
Loss from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses(611) (1,385)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations(608) (1,463)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(25) (142)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation(633) (1,605)
Income tax benefit (expense)(21) 495
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax$(654) $(1,110)
_____________________________
(1)
Includes a loss contingency recognized by our equity method investment in discontinued operations.
The following table summarizes the operating and investing cash flows from discontinued operations for the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,2017 2016
Cash flows provided by operating activities of discontinued operations$164
 $529
Cash flows used in investing activities of discontinued operations(288) (368)

23.24. HELD-FOR-SALE AND DISPOSITIONS
Held-for-Sale
Shady PointMong DuongIn December 2018,2020, the Company entered into an agreement to sell Shady Point,its entire 51% ownership interest in Mong Duong, a U.S. coal-fired generating facility,plant in Vietnam, and 51% equity interest in Mong Duong Finance Holdings B.V, an SPV accounted for $30 million, subject to customary purchase price adjustments.as an equity affiliate. The sale is subject to regulatory approval and is expected to close during the second half of 2019.in early 2023. As of December 31, 2018, Shady Point was2021, the Mong Duong plant and SPV were classified as held-for-sale, but did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Shady Point'sOn a consolidated basis, the carrying value of the plant and SPV held-for-sale as of December 31, 20182021 was $30$501 million. Mong Duong is reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Jordan — In November 2020, the Company signed an agreement to sell 26% ownership interest in IPP1 and IPP4 for $58 million. The sale is expected to close in the first half of 2022. After completion of the sale, the Company will retain a 10% ownership interest in IPP1 and IPP4, which will be accounted for as an equity method investment. As of December 31, 2021, the generation plants were classified as held-for-sale, but did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. On a consolidated basis, the carrying value of the plants held-for-sale as of December 31, 2021 was $175 million. Jordan is reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
Excluding any impairment charges, pre-tax income attributable to AES was $19 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Shady Point is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment. See Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Redondo Beach — In October 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to sell land held by AES Redondo Beach, a gas-fired generating facility in California. The sale is expected to close during the first half of 2019. Asbusinesses held-for-sale as of December 31, 2018, the $24 million carrying value of the land held by Redondo Beach2021 was classified as held-for-sale. Redondo Beach is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Mong Duong$56 $55 $34 
Jordan21 20 18 
Total$77 $75 $52 
Dispositions
CTNGColon transmission lineIn December 2018, AES Gener2021,Gas Natural Atlántico II S. de. R.L., completed the sale of CTNG, anits transmission line to Empresa de Distribucion Electrica, S.A., a government entity that holdsin charge of transmission linesof energy in Chile,Panama, for $225$51 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of $129$6 million, reported in Other income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to its sale, the Colon transmission line was reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Alto Maipo — In November 2021, Alto Maipo SpA filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, the Company determined it no longer had control over Alto Maipo, resulting in its deconsolidation. The Company recorded a pre-tax loss on deconsolidation of $2,074 million in Gain (Loss) on disposal and sale of business interests on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As Alto Maipo represents a component of AES Andes’ single reporting unit, the carrying value of the net assets of Alto Maipo included an allocation of $224 million of AES Andes’ consolidated goodwill balance of $868 million prior to deconsolidation. The Company allocated AES Andes’ goodwill based on the relative fair value of the component, which was determined based on the relative fair values of the business to be disposed and the portion of the reporting unit to be retained. Subsequent to the deconsolidation of Alto Maipo, the company evaluated the remaining Andes Reporting Unit goodwill and determined the goodwill was not at-risk.
The deconsolidation did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. After deconsolidation, the Company's retained investment in Alto Maipo was recognized as a financial asset with zero fair value, utilizing a restructuring model of cash flows and a cost of equity of 21%. Prior to deconsolidation, Alto Maipo was reported in the South America SBU reportable segment. See Note 5Fair Value, Note 9Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and Note 17Equityfor further information.
Estrella del Mar I — In November 2021, the Company completed the sale of the Estrella del Mar I power barge for $6 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to its sale, CTNGEstrella del Mar I was reported in the South AmericaMCAC SBU reportable segment. See Note 22Asset Impairment Expensefor further information.
Electrica SantiagoAES Tietê Inova SoluçõesIn May 2018, AES GenerJune 2021, the Company completed the sale of Electrica Santiagoits ownership in AES Inova Soluções, an investment platform in distributed solar generation, for total consideration of $287$20 million, resulting in a pre-tax gainloss on sale of $69 million after post-closing adjustments. Electrica Santiago consisted of four gas and diesel-fired generation plants in Chile.$1 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to its sale, Electrica SantiagoAES Tietê Inova Soluções was reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Stuart and Killen

187 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

ItaboIn May 2018, DPL retired the co-owned Stuart coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units, and the Killen coal-fired generating unit and combustion turbine. Prior to their retirement, Stuart and Killen were reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment. See Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
Masinloc — In March 2018,April 2021, the Company completed the sale of its entire 51% equity43% ownership interest in MasinlocItabo, a coal-fired plant and gas turbine in Dominican Republic, for cash proceeds of $1.05 billion,$88 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of $772 million after post-closing adjustments, subject to U.S. income tax. Masinloc consisted of a coal-fired generation plant in operation, a coal-fired generation plant under construction and an energy storage facility all located in the Philippines.$4 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to its sale, MasinlocItabo was reported in the EurasiaMCAC SBU reportable segment.
Uruguaiana — In 2014,September 2020, the Company completed the sale of 45% of its ownershipentire interest in Masinloc for $436 million, including $23 million of consideration that was contingent upon the achievement of certain tax restructuring efficiencies. In December 2017, the related contingency expired and the $23 million of contingent consideration was recognized as a gain in Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
DPL peaker assets — In March 2018, DPL completed the sale of six of its combustion turbine and diesel-fired generation facilities and related assets ("DPL peaker assets") for total proceeds of $239 million, inclusive of estimated working capital and subject to customary post-closing adjustments,AES Uruguaiana, resulting in a pre-tax loss on sale of $2$95 million, primarily due to the write-off of cumulative translation adjustments. As part of the sale agreement, the Company has guaranteed payment of certain contingent liabilities and provided indemnifications to the buyer which were estimated to have a fair value of $22 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to theirits sale, the DPL peaker assets wereUruguaiana was reported in the US and UtilitiesSouth America SBU reportable segment.
Beckjord facility — In February 2018, DPL transferred its interest in Beckjord, a coal-fired generation facility retired in 2014, including its obligations to remediate the facility and its site. The transfer resulted in cash expenditures of $15 million, inclusive of disposal charges, and a loss on disposal of $12 million. Prior to the transfer, Beckjord was reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Advancion Energy Storage — In January 2018, the Company deconsolidated the AES Advancion energy storage development business and contributed it to the Fluence joint venture, resulting in a gain on sale of $23 million. See Note 7—Investments in and Advances to Affiliates for further discussion. Prior to the transfer, the AES Advancion energy storage development business was reported as part of Corporate and Other.
Zimmer and Miami Fort — In December 2017, DPL and AES Ohio Generation completed the sale of Zimmer and Miami Fort, two coal-fired generating plants, for net proceeds of $70 million, resulting in a gain on sale of $13 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to their sale, Zimmer and Miami Fort were reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Kazakhstan HydroelectricAffiliates of the Company (the “Affiliates”) previously operated Shulbinsk HPP and Ust-Kamenogorsk HPP (the “HPPs”), two hydroelectric plants in Kazakhstan, under a concession agreement with the Republic of Kazakhstan (“RoK”ROK”). In April 2017, the RoKROK initiated the process to transfer these plants back to the RoK.ROK. The RoKROK indicated that arbitration would be necessary to determine the correct Return Share Transfer Payment ("RST") and, rather than paying the Affiliates, deposited the RST into an escrow account. In exchange, the Affiliates transferred 100% of the shares in the HPPs to the RoK,ROK, under protest and with a full reservation of rights. The Company recorded a loss on disposal of $33 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. In February 2018, the Affiliates initiated the arbitration process in international court to recover at least $75 million of the RST placed in escrow, based on the September 30, 2017 RST calculation. As of December 31, 2018,
In May 2020, the arbitration proceedings are ongoing, and additional losses are not considered probable at this time. However, additional losses may be incurred if some or allarbitrator issued a final decision in favor of the disputed consideration is not paid byAffiliates, awarding the RoK viaAffiliates a mutually acceptable settlement, or upon any unfavorable decision rendered bynet amount of damages of approximately $45 million, which has been collected. AES recorded the arbiter. The transfer did not meetremaining $30 million as a loss on sale during the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations.quarter ended June 30, 2020. Prior to their transfer, the Kazakhstan HPPs were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense for further information.
Kazakhstan CHPsRedondo Beach Land In April 2017,March 2020, the Company completed the sale of Ust-Kamenogorsk CHPland held by AES Redondo Beach, a gas-fired generating facility in California. The land’s carrying value was $24 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain on sale of $41 million, reported in Other income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. AES Redondo Beach will lease back the land from the purchaser for the remainder of the generation facility’s useful life. Redondo Beach is reported in the US and Sogrinsk CHP,Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Stuart and Killen — In December 2019, DPL completed the transfer of the co-owned Stuart coal-fired and diesel-fired generating units and the Killen coal-fired generating unit and combustion turbine retired in May 2018, including the associated environmental liabilities. The transfer resulted in cash expenditures of $51 million and a gain on disposal of $20 million. Prior to their transfer, Stuart and Killen were reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment. See Note 22Asset Impairment Expensefor further information.
Kilroot and Ballylumford — In June 2019, the Company completed the sale of its combined heatingentire interest in the Kilroot coal and power coal plantsoil-fired plant and energy storage facility and the Ballylumford gas-fired plant in Kazakhstan,the United Kingdom for net proceeds of $24 million. The Company recognized$118 million, resulting in a pre-tax loss on sale of $49$33 million primarily relateddue to the write-off of cumulative translation losses.adjustments and accumulated other comprehensive income balances. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Prior to theirthe sale, the Kazakhstan CHP plantsKilroot and Ballylumford were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment. See Note 20—22Asset Impairment Expensefor further information.
UK WindDuring 2016, the Company determined it no longer had control of its wind development projects in the United Kingdom (“UK Wind”) as the Company no longer held seats on the board of directors. In accordance with accounting guidance, UK Wind was deconsolidated and a loss on deconsolidation of $20 million was recorded to Gain (loss) on disposal and sale of business interests in the Consolidated Statement of Operations to write off the Company’s noncontrolling interest in the project. The UK Wind projects were reported in the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.
DPLERShady Point In January 2016,May 2019, the Company completed the sale of DPLER,Shady Point, a competitive retail marketer selling electricity to customers in Ohio, and recognized a gain on sale of $49 million. Proceeds of $76 million were received in December 2015. DPLER did not meet the criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation. DPLER's results were therefore reflected within continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to its sale, DPLER was reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
KelanitissaIn January 2016, the Company completed the sale of its interest in Kelanitissa, a diesel-fired generation plant in Sri Lanka,U.S. coal-fired generating facility, for $18 million, resulting in a loss on sale of $5$29 million. The sale did not meet the criteria to be reported as discontinued operations. Kelanitissa's results were therefore reflected within continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to its sale, KelanitissaShady Point was reported in the EurasiaUS and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Jordan See Note 22 In February 2016, the Company completed the sale of 40% of its interest in a wholly-owned subsidiary in Jordan that owns a controlling interest in the Jordan IPP4 gas-fired plant Asset Impairment Expensefor $21 million. The transaction was accounted for as a sale of in-substance real estate and a pre-tax gain of $4 million, net of transaction costs, was recognized in net income. The cash proceeds from the sale are reflected in Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of cash and restricted cash sold on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period ended December 31, 2016. After completion of the sale, the Company has a 36% economic interest in Jordan IPP4 and continues to manage and operate the plant. As the Company maintained control after the sale, Jordan IPP4 continues to be consolidated by the Company within the Eurasia SBU reportable segment.further information.


188 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

ExcludingThe following table summarizes, excluding any impairment charge or gain/loss on sale, the pre-tax income (loss) attributable to AES of disposed businesses was as followsfor the periods indicated (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
Masinloc$9
 $103
 $103
Stuart and Killen (1)(2)
77
 17
 
DPL peaker assets7
 17
 20
Zimmer and Miami Fort
 26
 (14)
Kazakhstan Hydroelectric
 33
 34
Kazakhstan CHPs
 13
 12
Other14
 9
 11
Total$107
 $218
 $166
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Alto Maipo$35 $11 $(6)
Itabo41 30 
Estrella de Mar I— 12 
Stuart and Killen (1)
— — 52 
Shady Point— — (5)
Other— — (3)
Total$40 $57 $80 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)After the retirement of Stuart and Killen in 2018, the Company entered into contracts to buy back all open capacity years for the plants at prices lower than the PJM capacity revenue prices. As such, the Company continued to earn capacity margin until the plants were transferred in December 2019.
The Company entered into contracts to buy back all open capacity years for Stuart and Killen at prices lower than the PJM capacity revenue prices. As such, the Company continues to earn capacity margin.
(2)
Reductions in the asset retirement obligations for ash ponds and landfills at Stuart and Killen in 2018 resulted in a $32 million reduction to cost of sales. See Note 3—Property, Plant and Equipment for further information.
24.
25. ACQUISITIONS
Distributed EnergyHardy Hills Solar — In December 2018, Distributed Energy acquired2021, AES Indiana completed the outstanding noncontrolling interest inacquisition of Hardy Hills solar project, which included assets of $52 million primarily consisting of a partnership holding various solar projects from its tax equity partner for $23 million of consideration in a non-cash transaction through the assumption of debt, increasing the Company's ownership to 100%. The partnership was previously classified as an equity method investment.development project intangible asset. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, therefore the Company remeasured the equity investment at fair value and recognized a loss of $5 million in Other expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of the investment, along with the consideration transferred, plus transaction costs, were allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Distributed Energy is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
In September 2016, Distributed Energy acquired the equity interest of various projects held by multiple partnerships for approximately $43 million. These partnerships were previously classified as equity method investments. In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, the Company recorded the opening balance sheets of the acquired businesses based on the purchase price allocation as of the acquisition date.
Oahu In November 2018, AES Oahu amended a 2017 agreement to acquire 100% of Na Pua Makani Power Partners, a partnership designed to develop and hold a wind project in Hawaii. The fair value of the initial consideration was $53 million, of which $48 million was contingent on meeting predefined development milestones. The transaction was accounted for as an acquisition of a variable interest entity that did not meet the definition of a business; therefore, the individual assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values. A $6 million gain was recorded in Other income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the difference between the consideration transferred and the assets and liabilities recognized. The total consideration included $3 million of contingent consideration dependent on the amount of certain future costs incurred by the project. Any differences arising from post-closing adjustments will be allocated accordingly. Hardy Hills Solar is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Community Energy — In December 2021, AES Clean Energy Development, LLC completed the acquisition of Community Energy, LLC for $217 million cash consideration, including customary purchase price adjustments, plus the assumption of $38 million of non-recourse debt. At closing, the Company made a cash payment of $232 million, which included $15 million of the assumed non-recourse debt. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination; therefore, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date were recorded at their fair values, which resulted in the recognition of $90 million of goodwill. The Company has recorded preliminary amounts for the purchase price allocation; however, the Company may continue to make adjustments. Community Energy is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
sPower Projects — In December 2021, AES Clean Energy Development Holdings, LLC entered into an agreement with AIMCo, our minority partner in AES Clean Energy Development, LLC and our partner in the sPower equity method investment. As part of this transaction, AES acquired an additional 25% ownership interest in specifically identified projects of sPower from AIMCo, in exchange for a 25% ownership interest in the Mountain View and Laurel Mountain wind operating projects, plus $28 million cash.
The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition. The sPower projects received were remeasured at their acquisition-date fair values, resulting in the recognition of a $35 million gain, recorded in Other Income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 8Investments in and Advances to Affiliatesfor further information. The Company recorded $3 million in additional paid-in-capital, representing the difference between the fair value of the consideration transferred and the recognition of the noncontrolling interest.
Subsequent to the closing of the transaction, AES holds a 75% ownership interest in the Mountain View and Laurel Mountain wind operating projects and a 75% ownership interest in specifically identified projects of sPower through its ownership of AES Clean Energy Development, LLC, and 50% ownership interest in the sPower equity method investment. AIMCo holds the remaining 25% minority interest in AES Clean Energy Development, LLC and 50% ownership interest in sPower. sPower projects are reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.


189 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

New York Wind — In November 2021, AES Clean Energy Development, LLC completed the acquisition of Cogentrix Valcour Intermediate Holdings, LLC for $352 million cash consideration, including customary purchase price adjustments, plus the assumption of $126 million of non-recourse debt. The transaction includes operating wind assets spread across six sites and will complement AES Clean Energy’s existing operating and development solar and energy storage assets in the state of New York. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination, therefore, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at acquisition date were recorded at their fair values, which resulted in the recognition of $199 million of goodwill. This goodwill represents the opportunity to repower the acquired assets and thus obtain additional cash flows from the asset group. The Company has recorded preliminary amounts for the purchase price allocation; however, the Company may continue to make adjustments pertaining to derivatives, leases, revenue from contracts with customers, and deferred taxes during the measurement period. New York Wind is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Serra Verde Wind Complex — In July 2021, AES Brasil completed the acquisition of the Serra Verde Wind Complex for $18 million, subject to customary working capital adjustments, of which $6 million was paid in cash and the remaining $12 million will be paid in two annual installments ending on July 19, 2023. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition of variable interest entities that did not meet the definition of a business; therefore, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values, which equaled the fair value of the consideration. As a result of the amendment, the Company paid $11 million in 2018 and the contingent consideration was reduced to $5 million, resulting in a $32 million gain on remeasurement of contingent consideration recorded in Other income in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. AES OahuAny differences arising from post-closing adjustments will be allocated accordingly. Serra Verde is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.South America SBU.
Guaimbê SolarCajuína Wind Complex ��� In September 2018,May 2021, AES TietêBrasil completed the acquisition of the Guaimbê SolarCajuína Wind Complex (“Guaimbê”) from Cobra do Brasilphase I for $152$22 million, subject to customary working capital adjustments. On July 29, 2021, AES Brasil completed the acquisition of the Cajuína Wind Complex phase II for $24 million, subject to customary working capital adjustments, including $3 million of contingent consideration. The Company made initial cash payments of $6 million for each acquisition and the remaining balances will be paid in three annual installments ending on March 31, 2024 and on July 29, 2024, respectively. These transactions were accounted for as asset acquisitions of variable interest entities that did not meet the definition of a business; therefore, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values, which equaled the fair value of the consideration. Any differences arising from post-closing adjustments comprisedwill be allocated accordingly. Cajuína is reported in the South America SBU.
Cubico Wind Complex — In April 2021, AES Brasil completed the acquisition of the exchange of $119Cubico Wind Complex for $109 million, of non-convertible debentures in project financing and additional cash consideration of $33 million.subject to customary working capital adjustments. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, therefore the consideration transferred, plus transaction costs, were allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Any differences arising from post-closing adjustments will be allocated accordingly. GuaimbêCubico is reported in the South America SBU.
AES Clean Energy Development — In February 2021, the Company substantially completed the merger of the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms to form AES Clean Energy Development, which will serve as the development vehicle for all future renewable projects in the U.S. As part of the transaction, AES acquired an additional 25% ownership interest in the sPower development platform from AIMCo, our existing partner in the sPower equity method investment, in exchange for a 25% ownership interest in specifically identified development entities of AES Renewable Holdings, certain future exit rights in the new partnership, and $7 million of cash.
The sPower development platform was carved-out of AES’ existing equity method investment. AES’ basis in the portion of assets transferred was $102 million, and the contribution to AES Clean Energy Development resulted in a corresponding decrease in the carrying value of the sPower investment. See Note 8Investments in and Advances to Affiliatesfor further information.
During the first quarter of 2021, the sPower development assets transferred were remeasured at their acquisition-date preliminary fair values, resulting in the recognition of a $36 million gain, recorded in Other income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company recorded $81 million in Goodwill as of the acquisition date, representing the difference between the fair value of the consideration transferred, the noncontrolling interest in the sPower development platform, and the acquisition-date fair value of the Company’s previously held equity interest and the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.


190 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

During the second quarter of 2021, the Company recorded measurement period adjustments as result of additional facts and circumstances that existed as of the date of the acquisition but were not yet known as of the time of the valuation performed in the first quarter of 2021. These measurement period adjustments primarily relate to higher expected developer profits and a higher growth rate, reflective of additional information that became available regarding market participants’ views of the value of early-stage renewable development projects as of the date of acquisition. As a result, the estimated acquisition-date carrying value and fair values of the sPower development assets transferred were increased, which resulted in the recognition of an additional $178 million gain, for an updated gain of $214 million. Furthermore, the estimated goodwill as of the acquisition date was reduced to $45 million, as a result of adjustments to the fair value of the consideration paid and updates to the fair values of separately identifiable intangible assets. The Company finalized the purchase price allocation in the third quarter of 2021, which did not result in any material measurement period adjustments.
Subsequent to the closing of the transaction, AES holds a 75% ownership interest in AES Clean Energy Development. AIMCo holds the remaining 25% minority interest along with certain partnership rights, though currently not in effect, that would enable AIMCo to exit in the future. AIMCo’s minority interest is recorded as temporary equity in Redeemable stock of subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 16Redeemable Stock of Subsidiaries for further information. AES Clean Energy Development is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Great Cove Solar— In January 2021 and May 2021, AES Clean Energy Development, LLC completed the acquisitions of Great Cove I and II, respectively. The fair value of the initial consideration paid to acquire Great Cove I and Great Cove II was $13 million and $24 million, which included contingent consideration liabilities of $6 million and $22 million, respectively. These acquisitions were accounted for as asset acquisitions of variable interest entities that did not meet the definition of a business; therefore, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values, which equaled the fair value of the consideration. During the third quarter of 2021, the contingent liabilities which related primarily to certain price adjustment features were remeasured, resulting in contingent consideration assets of $2 million and $12 million for Great Cove I and Great Cove II, respectively. This remeasurement resulted in a gain of $32 million recorded in Other income in the Consolidated Statement of Operations during the third quarter of 2021. In October 2021, the Company amended the agreement, resulting in the reclassification of the previously contingent consideration assets to Prepaid Expenses. In December 2021, the Company acquired Community Energy, LLC (as further described above), and such remaining prepaid amounts were written off to Other income in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Great Cove Solar is reported in the US and Utilities SBU reportable segment.
Ventus Wind Complex — In December 2020, AES Brasil completed the acquisition of the Ventus Wind Complex ("Ventus") for $90 million, including $3 million of working capital adjustments. At closing, the Company made an initial cash payment of $44 million. The remainder was paid in the second and third quarter of 2021. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition; therefore, the total amount of consideration, plus transaction costs, was allocated to the individual assets and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Any differences arising from post-closing adjustments will be allocated accordingly. Ventus is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.
Alto Sertão II —Penonome I In August 2017, the CompanyMay 2020, AES Panama completed the acquisition of the Alto Sertão II Wind Complex (“Alto Sertão II”)Penonome I wind farm from Renova EnergiaGoldwind International for $80 million. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, therefore the consideration transferred, plus transaction costs, was allocated to the individual assets and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. Any differences arising from post-closing adjustments will be allocated accordingly. Penonome I is reported in the MCAC SBU reportable segment.
Los Cururos — In November 2019, AES Andes completed the acquisition of the Los Cururos wind farm and transmission lines in Chile from EPM Chile S.A. for $179 million, plus the assumption of $346 million of non-recourse debt. At closing, the Company made a cash paymenttotal consideration of $143 million, which excluded holdbacks related to indemnifications. In September 2018, an additional $12including $5 million wasin working capital adjustments paid to settle a portion of the remaining indemnification liability. Inin the first quarter of 2018,2020. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, therefore the Company finalized the purchase price allocation relatedconsideration transferred, plus transaction costs, was allocated to the acquisition of Alto Sertão II. There were no significant adjustments made to the preliminary purchase price

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

allocation recorded in the third quarter of 2017 when the acquisition was completed. Theindividual assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date were recorded at fair value, including a contingent liability for earn-out payments of $18 million, based on the final purchase price allocation at March 31, 2018. Subsequent changes to thetheir relative fair value of the earn-out payments will be reflected in earnings. Alto Sertão IIvalues. Los Cururos is reported in the South America SBU reportable segment.

25.

191 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

26. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and potential common stock outstanding during the period. Potential common stock, for purposes of determining diluted earnings per share, includes the effects of dilutive RSUs, stock options, and convertible securities.equity units. The effect of such potential common stock is computed using the treasury stock method orfor RSUs and stock options, and is computed using the if-converted method as applicable.for equity units.
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation for income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, where income represents the numerator and weighted-average shares represent the denominator.
Year Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
(in millions, except per share data)Income Shares $ per Share Loss Shares $ per Share Loss Shares $ per Share
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE                 
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders (1)
$985
 662
 $1.49
 $(507) 660
 $(0.77) $(25) 660
 $(0.04)
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES    
            
Restricted stock units
 3
 (0.01) 
 
 
 
 
 
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE$985
 665
 $1.48
 $(507) 660
 $(0.77) $(25) 660
 $(0.04)

Year Ended December 31,202120202019
(in millions, except per share data)LossShares$ per ShareIncomeShares$ per ShareIncomeShares$ per Share
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$(413)666 $(0.62)$43 665 $0.06 $302 664 $0.46 
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
Stock options— — — — — — — — 
Restricted stock units— — — — — — (0.01)
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE$(413)666 $(0.62)$43 668 $0.06 $302 667 $0.45 
_____________________________
(1)
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax, of $20 million lessFor the year ended December 31, 2021, the $5 million adjustment to retained earnings to record the DP&L redeemable preferred stock at its redemption value as of December 31, 2016.
The calculation of diluted earnings per share excluded 5 million outstanding stock awards and convertible debentures which would be anti-dilutive. The calculation of diluted earnings per share excluded 240 million 7 million and 8 million stock awards outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2016, all 15 million convertible debentures were excluded from the earnings per share calculation. The Company redeemed all of its existing convertible debentures in June 2017.
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, the calculation of diluted earnings per share also excluded 4 million and 5 million outstanding restricted stock units that could potentially dilute earnings per share in the futureshares underlying our March 2021 Equity Units because their impact would be anti-dilutive given the loss from continuing operations. These shares could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future. Had the Company generated income, 24 million and 33 million potential shares of common stock related to the restricted stock unitsawards and the Equity Units, respectively, would have been included in diluted averageweighted-average shares outstandingoutstanding.
As described in Note 17Equity, the Company issued 10,430,500 Equity Units in March 2021 with a total notional value of $1,043 million. Each Equity Unit has a stated amount of $100 and was initially issued as a Corporate Unit, consisting of a 2024 Purchase Contract and a 10% undivided beneficial ownership interest in one share of Series A Preferred Stock. Prior to February 15, 2024, the Series A Preferred Stock may be converted at the option of the holder only in connection with a fundamental change. On and after February 15, 2024, the Series A Preferred Stock may be converted freely at the option of the holder. Upon conversion, the Company will deliver to the holder with respect to each share of Series A Preferred Stock being converted (i) a share of our Series B Preferred Stock, or, solely with respect to conversions in connection with a redemption, cash and (ii) shares of our common stock, if any, in respect of any conversion value in excess of the liquidation preference of the preferred stock being converted. The conversion rate is initially 31.5428 shares of common stock per one share of Series A Preferred Stock, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $31.70 per share of common stock. The Series A Preferred Stock and the 2024 Purchase Contracts are being accounted for each period.as one unit of account. In calculating diluted EPS, the Company has applied the if-converted method beginning in the third quarter of 2021 to determine the impact of the forward purchase feature and considered if there are incremental shares that should be included related to the Series A Preferred conversion value. Previously, the Company had applied the treasury stock method with respect to the Equity Units, which had no impact on reported diluted EPS.
26.27. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
AES is a diversified power generation and utility company organized into four4 market-oriented SBUs. See additional discussion of the Company's principal markets in Note 15—18—SegmentSegments and Geographic Information. Within our four4 SBUs, we have two2 primary lines of business: generation and utilities. The generation line of business uses a wide range of fuels and technologies to generate electricity such as coal, gas, hydro, wind, solar, and biomass. Our utilities business comprises businesses that transmit, distribute, and in certain circumstances, generate power. In addition, the Company has operations in the renewables area. These efforts include projects primarily in wind, solar, and solar.energy storage.
Operating and Economic Risks — The Company operates in several developing economies where macroeconomic conditions are usuallytypically more volatile than developed economies. Deteriorating market conditions oftenand evolving industry expectations to transition away from fossil fuel sources for generation expose the Company to


192 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

the risk of decreased earnings and cash flows due to, among other factors, adverse fluctuations in the commodities and foreign currency spot markets.markets, and potential changes in the estimated useful lives of our thermal plants. Additionally, credit markets around the globe continue to tighten their standards, which could impact our ability to finance growth projects through access to capital markets. Currently, the Company has an investment grade rating from both Standard & Poor's and Fitch of BBB-, and a below-investment grade rating from Standard & Poor's of BB+, Fitch of BB+, and Moody's of Ba1. ThisA downgrade in our current investment grade ratings could affect the Company's ability to finance new and/or existing development

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

projects at competitive interest rates. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had $1.2 billion$943 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents.
During 2018,2021, 68% of our revenue was generated outside the U.S. and a significant portion of our international operations is conducted in developing countries. We continue to invest in several developing countries to expand our existing platform and operations. International operations, particularly the operation, financing, and development of projects in developing countries, entail significant risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation:
economic, social, and political instability in any particular country or region;
inability to economically hedge energy prices;
volatility in commodity prices;
adverse changes in currency exchange rates;
government restrictions on converting currencies or repatriating funds;
unexpected changes in foreign laws, regulatory framework, or in trade, monetary or fiscal policies;
high inflation and monetary fluctuations;
restrictions on imports of solar panels, wind turbines, coal, oil, gas, or other raw materials required by our generation businesses to operate;
threatened or consummated expropriation or nationalization of our assets by foreign governments;
unwillingness of governments, government agencies, similar organizations, or other counterparties to honor their commitments;
unwillingness of governments, government agencies, courts, or similar bodies to enforce contracts that are economically advantageous to subsidiaries of the Company and economically unfavorable to counterparties, against such counterparties, whether such counterparties are governments or private parties;
inability to obtain access to fair and equitable political, regulatory, administrative, and legal systems;
adverse changes in government tax policy;
potentially adverse tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions;
difficulties in enforcing our contractual rights, enforcing judgments, or obtaining a just result in local jurisdictions; and
potentially adverse tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions.inability to obtain financing on expected terms.
Any of these factors, individually or in combination with others, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, our Latin American operations experience volatility in revenue and earnings which have caused and are expected to cause significant volatility in our results of operations and cash flows. The volatility is caused by regulatory and economic difficulties, political instability, indexation of certain PPAs to fuel prices, and currency fluctuations being experienced in many of these countries. This volatility reduces the predictability and enhances the uncertainty associated with cash flows from these businesses.
Our inability to predict, influence or respond appropriately to changes in law or regulatory schemes, including any inability to obtain reasonable increases in tariffs or tariff adjustments for increased expenses, could adversely impact our results of operations or our ability to meet publicly announced projections or analysts' expectations. Furthermore, changes in laws or regulations or changes in the application or interpretation of regulatory provisions in jurisdictions where we operate, particularly our utility businesses where electricity tariffs are subject to regulatory review or approval, could adversely affect our business, including, but not limited to:
changes in the determination, definition, or classification of costs to be included as reimbursable or pass-through costs;


193 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

changes in the definition or determination of controllable or noncontrollable costs;
adverse changes in tax law;
changes in the definition of events which may or may not qualify as changes in economic equilibrium;
changes in the timing of tariff increases;
other changes in the regulatory determinations under the relevant concessions; or

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

changes in environmental regulations, including regulations relating to GHG emissions in any of our businesses.
Any of the above events may result in lower margins for the affected businesses, which can adversely affect our results of operations.
COVID-19 Pandemic The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted global economic activity, including electricity and energy consumption, and caused significant volatility in financial markets.The magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown at this time and may have material and adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows in future periods.
Alto Maipo On August 27, 2021, Alto Maipo updated its creditors with respect to the construction budget and long-term business plan for the project, which considers different scenarios for spot prices, decarbonization initiatives, and hydrological conditions, among other significant variables. Under some of these scenarios, Alto Maipo may experience reduced future cash flows, which would limit its ability to repay debt. Alto Maipo’s management initiated negotiations with its creditors to restructure its obligations and achieve a sustainable long-term capital structure for Alto Maipo. On November 17, 2021, Alto Maipo SpA commenced a reorganization proceeding in accordance with Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, through a voluntary petition. Consequently, after the Chapter 11 filing, the Company is no longer considered to have control over Alto Maipo, which resulted in its deconsolidation. The Company recognized an after-tax loss of approximately $1.2 billion, net of noncontrolling interests, in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the fourth quarter of 2021, associated with the loss of control attributable to the former controlling interest.
Alto Maipo is party to a restructuring support agreement to which holders of more than 78% of the outstanding senior indebtedness are party, and which contemplates a plan of reorganization in which AES Andes will own all of the equity of the reorganized company. If Alto Maipo is unable to renegotiate the terms of its financial arrangements with its creditors and is unable to meet its obligations under those arrangements as they come due, the creditors may enforce their rights under the credit agreements. These finance agreements are non-recourse with respect to The AES Corporation.
Foreign Currency Risks — AES operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Fluctuations in currency exchange rate between U.S. dollarthe USD and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows: the Argentine peso, the Brazilian real, the Dominican Republic peso, the Euro, the Chilean peso, the Colombian peso, the Dominican peso, the Euro, the Indian rupee, and the PhilippineMexican peso.
Argentina — In September 2019, currency controls were established by the Argentine government in order to control the devaluation of the Argentine peso and keep Argentine central bank reserves at acceptable levels. Restrictions on the flow of capital have limited the availability of international credit, and economic conditions in Argentina have further deteriorated, triggering additional devaluation of the Argentine peso and a deterioration of the country’s risk profile.
Concentrations — Due to the geographical diversity of its operations, the Company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply. Several of the Company's generation businesses rely on PPAs with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of, and in some cases all of, the relevant businesses' output over the term of the PPAs. However, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue in 2018, 20172021, 2020 or 2016.2019.
The cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under PPAs and fuel supply agreements. If a substantial portion of the Company's long-term PPAs and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated, the Company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms.

27.

194 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

28. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain of our businesses in Panama and the Dominican Republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions. In the ordinary course of business, these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions, and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments. At two of our generation businesses in Mexico, the offtakers exercise significant influence, but not control, through representation on these businesses' Boards of Directors. These offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses. In Chile, we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Additionally, the Company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements.
The Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,2018 2017 2016
Revenue—Non-Regulated$1,533
 $1,297
 $1,100
Cost of Sales—Non-Regulated342
 220
 210
Interest income14
 8
 4
Interest expense54
 36
 39

Years Ended December 31,202120202019
Revenue—Non-Regulated$1,159 $1,506 $1,544 
Cost of Sales—Non-Regulated324 504 531 
Interest income12 20 21 
Interest expense88 131 74 
The following table summarizes the balances receivable from and payable to related parties included in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the periods indicated (in millions):
December 31,20212020
Receivables from related parties$131 $252 
Accounts and notes payable to related parties (1)
1,421 1,765 
December 31,2018 2017
Receivables from related parties$371
 $250
Accounts and notes payable to related parties754
 727

_____________________________
The Company entered into(1)Includes $1 billion of debt to Mong Duong Finance Holdings B.V., an SPV accounted for as an equity transaction withaffiliate as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 (see Note 11—Debt). As of December 31, 2021, the debt balance at the SPV was reclassified to held-for-sale liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Also includes $181 million of debt to Banco General S.A., a bank in Panama where our related party, Linda Group, see Note 14—Equity for further information.former minority partner in Colon is part of its board of directors as of December 31, 2020; and $379 million of debt to Strabag, our EPC contractor and minority partner in Alto Maipo as of December 31, 2020.
28.29. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly Financial Data — The following tables summarize the unaudited quarterly Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Company for 20182021 and 20172020 (amounts in millions, except per share data). Amounts have been restated to reflect discontinued operations in all periods presented and reflect all adjustments necessary in the opinion of management for a fair statement of the results for interim periods.

THE AES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016

Quarter Ended 2021Mar 31Jun 30Sep 30Dec 31
Revenue$2,635 $2,700 $3,036 $2,770 
Operating margin664 728 760 559 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax (1)
(29)(81)485 (1,330)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax— — — 
Net income (loss)$(29)$(77)$485 $(1,330)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(148)$28 $343 $(632)
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.22)$0.03 $0.52 $(0.95)
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax— 0.01 — — 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$(0.22)$0.04 $0.52 $(0.95)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.22)$0.03 $0.48 $(0.95)
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax— 0.01 — — 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$(0.22)$0.04 $0.48 $(0.95)
Dividends declared per common share$0.15 $— $0.15 $0.31 

Quarter Ended 2018Mar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30 Dec 31
Revenue$2,740
 $2,537
 $2,837
 $2,622
Operating margin656
 600
 671
 646
Income from continuing operations, net of tax (1)
778
 224
 192
 155
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (2)
(1) 192
 (1) 26
Net income$777
 $416
 $191
 $181
Net income attributable to The AES Corporation$684
 $290
 $101
 $128
Basic earnings per share:       
Income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$1.04
 $0.15
 $0.15
 $0.15
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax
 0.29
 
 0.04
Net income attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$1.04
 $0.44
 $0.15
 $0.19
Diluted earnings per share:       
Income from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$1.03
 $0.15
 $0.15
 $0.15
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax
 0.29
 
 0.04
Net income attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$1.03
 $0.44
 $0.15
 $0.19
Dividends declared per common share$0.13
 $
 $0.13
 $0.27

Quarter Ended 2017Mar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30 Dec 31
Revenue$2,581
 $2,613
 $2,693
 $2,643
Operating margin557
 623
 640
 645
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax (3)
97
 142
 235
 (622)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (4)
1
 8
 26
 (664)
Net income (loss)$98
 $150
 $261
 $(1,286)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$(24) $53
 $152
 $(1,342)
Basic earnings (loss) per share:       
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.04) $0.08
 $0.22
 $(1.03)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax
 
 0.01
 (1.00)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$(0.04) $0.08
 $0.23
 $(2.03)
Diluted earnings per share:       
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$(0.04) $0.08
 $0.22
 $(1.03)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax
 
 0.01
 (1.00)
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$(0.04) $0.08
 $0.23
 $(2.03)
Dividends declared per common share$0.12
 $
 $0.12
 $0.25
_____________________________
(1)
Includes pre-tax gains on sales of business interests of $788 million,$89 million195 | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) | December 31, 2021, 2020 and $128 million, in the first, second and fourth quarters of 2018, respectively, and pre-tax losses of $21 million in the third quarter of 2018 (See Note 23—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions), pre-tax impairment expense of $92 million, $74 million and $42 million, in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2018, respectively (See Note 20—Asset Impairment Expense), other-than-temporary impairment of Guacolda of $144 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 (See Note 7—Investments in and Advances to Affiliates), SAB 118 charges to finalize the provisional estimate of one-time transition tax on foreign earnings of $33 million and $161 million in the third and fourth quarters of 2018, respectively, and a SAB 118 income tax benefit to finalize the provisional estimate of remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate of $77 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 (See Note 21—Income Taxes).
2019

Quarter Ended 2020Mar 31Jun 30Sep 30Dec 31
Revenue$2,338 $2,217 $2,545 $2,560 
Operating margin507 524 756 906 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax (2)
229 — (481)401 
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax— — — 
Net income (loss)$229 $$(481)$401 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation$144 $(83)$(333)$318 
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.22 $(0.13)$(0.50)$0.48 
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax— 0.01 — — 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$0.22 $(0.12)$(0.50)$0.48 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax$0.22 $(0.13)$(0.50)$0.47 
Income from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax— 0.01 — — 
Net income (loss) attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders$0.22 $(0.12)$(0.50)$0.47 
Dividends declared per common share$0.14 $— $0.14 $0.29 
_____________________________
(1)Includes pre-tax impairment expense of $473 million, $872 million, and $201 million in the first, second, and fourth quarters of 2021, respectively (See Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense), and pre-tax loss on sale of business interests of $1.8 billion, primarily due to the deconsolidation of Alto Maipo, in the fourth quarter of 2021 (See Note 24—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions).
(2)Includes pre-tax impairment expense of $849 million in the third quarter of 2020 (See Note 22—Asset Impairment Expense), other-than-temporary impairment of OPGC of $43 million and $158 million in the first and second quarters of 2020, respectively, and net equity in losses of affiliates, primarily at Guacolda, of $112 million in the third quarter of 2020 (See Note 8—Investments in and Advances to Affiliates).
30. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
AES Brasil Preferred Shares — On January 6, 2022, Guaimbê Holding issued preferred shares representing 3.5% ownership in the subsidiary for total proceeds of $63 million. The transaction decreased the Company’s indirect ownership interest in the operational entities from 37.4% to 35.8%. As the Company maintained control after the transaction, Guaimbê Holding continues to be consolidated by the Company within the South America SBU reportable segment.
AES Andes — In January 2022, Inversiones Cachagua SpA, a wholly-owned AES subsidiary in Chile, completed a tender offer for the shares of AES Andes held by minority shareholders. Upon completion, AES' indirect beneficial interest in AES Andes increased from 67% to 99%.
The AES Corporation — In February 2022, the Company announced its intent to exit coal generation by year-end 2025 versus our prior expectation of a reduction to below 10% by year-end 2025, subject to necessary approvals. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this new goal will have on our financial statements.


(2)
Includes gain on sale of Eletropaulo of $199 million in the second quarter of 2018 (See Note 22—Discontinued Operations).
196 | 2021 Annual Report
(3)

Includes provisional tax expense related to a one-time transition tax on foreign earnings of $675 million and the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower corporate tax rate of $39 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 (See Note 21—Income Taxes), pre-tax impairment expense of $168 million, $90 million and $277 million, in the first, second and fourth quarters of 2017, respectively (SeeNote 20—Asset Impairment Expense), and pre-tax losses on sales of business interests of $48 million in second quarter of 2017 (See Note 23—Held-for-Sale and Dispositions).
(4)
Includes loss on deconsolidation of Eletropaulo of $611 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 (See Note 22—Discontinued Operations).
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.


The Company carried out the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that as of December 31, 2018,2021, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
provide reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements are prevented or detected timely.
Management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. In addition, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls is subject to risks that those internal controls may become inadequate in future periods because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures deteriorates.
In February 2021, the Company substantially completed the merger of the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms to form AES Clean Energy Development (“Clean Energy”). As a result, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the merger have been included in AES’ Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021. Clean Energy’s total assets and total revenue represented 4% and 1% of AES’ consolidated total assets and revenues, respectively, as of December 31, 2021. Clean Energy’s net loss of $69 million for the period February 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 was included in AES’ Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2021. Legacy sPower entities continue to be accounted for as an equity method investment. As permitted by SEC guidance, newly acquired Clean Energy businesses have been excluded from management’s formal evaluation of the effectiveness of AES’ disclosure controls and procedures due to the timing of the acquisitions.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in 2013. Based on this assessment, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2021.
The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.



197 | 2021 Annual Report
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
There were no changes that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20182021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.





198 | 2021 Annual Report

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of The AES Corporation:Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited The AES Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, The AES Corporation (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on the COSO criteria.
As indicated in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the acquired businesses as part of the merger of the sPower and AES Renewable Holdings development platforms to form AES Clean Energy Development (Clean Energy), which is included in the 2021 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 4% and 1% of total assets and revenue, respectively, as of December 31, 2021. Clean Energy’s net loss of $69 million for the period February 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 was included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Clean Energy.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”), and our report dated February 26, 2019,28, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



199 | 2021 Annual Report
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tysons, Virginia
February 26, 201928, 2022



200 | 2021 Annual Report



ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.




201 | 2021 Annual Report
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The following information is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the Registrant's 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which the Registrant expects will be filed on or around March 6, 20197, 2022 (the "2019"2022 Proxy Statement"):
information regarding the directors required by this item found under the heading Board of Directors;
information regarding AES' Code of Ethics found under the heading Additional Governance Matters - AES Code of Business Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines;
information regarding compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act required by this item found under the heading Additional Governance Matters - Other Governance Information - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance; and
information regarding AES' Financial Audit Committee found under the heading Board and Committee Governance Matters
information regarding the directors required by this item found under the heading Board of Directors - Biographies;
information regarding AES' Code of Ethics found under the heading Corporate Governance at AES - Additional Governance Information; and
information regarding AES' Financial Audit Committee found under the heading Board and Committee Governance - Board Committees - Financial Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”).
Certain information regarding executive officers required by this Item is presented as a supplementary item in Part I hereof (pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K). The other information required by this Item, to the extent not included above, will be contained in our 20192022 Proxy Statement and is herein incorporated by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K iswill be contained in the 20192022 Proxy Statement under "Director Compensation" and "Executive Compensation" (excluding the information under the caption “Report of the Compensation Committee”) and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K iswill be contained under the caption “Report of the Compensation Committee Report”Committee” of the Proxy Statement. Such information shall not be deemed to be “filed.”
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
(a)Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
See the information contained under the heading Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors, and Executive Officers of the 20192022 Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
(b)Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.
The following table provides information about shares of AES common stock that may be issued under AES' equity compensation plans, as of December 31, 2018:2021:
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (As of December 31, 2018)2021)
(a) (b) (c)(a)(b)(c)
Plan categoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))Plan categoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsWeighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rightsNumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
9,794,600
(2) 
$12.36
 14,534,999
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
5,558,410 (2)$12.83 12,137,212 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders— — — 
Total9,794,600
 $12.36
 14,534,999
Total5,558,410 $12.83 12,137,212 
_____________________________
(1)
(1)The following equity compensation plans have been approved by The AES Corporation's Stockholders:
The following equity compensation plans have been approved by The AES Corporation's Stockholders:
(A)
The AES Corporation 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan was adopted in 2003 and provided for 17,000,000 shares authorized for issuance thereunder. In 2008, an amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 12,000,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 29,000,000. In 2010, an additional amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 9,000,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 38,000,000. In 2015, an additional amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 7,750,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 45,750,000. The weighted average exercise price of Options outstanding under this plan included in Column (b) is $12.36 (excluding performance stock units, restricted stock units and director stock units), with 14,534,999 shares available for future issuance.
(B)
The AES Corporation Second Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for directors provided for 2,000,000 shares authorized for issuance. Column (b) excludes the Director stock units granted thereunder. In conjunction with the 2010 amendment to the 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan, ongoing award issuance from this plan was discontinued in 2010 as Director stock units will be issued from the 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan. Any remaining shares under this plan, which are not reserved for

(a)The AES Corporation 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan was adopted in 2003 and provided for 17,000,000 shares authorized for issuance thereunder. In 2008, an amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 12,000,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 29,000,000. In 2010, an additional amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 9,000,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 38,000,000. In 2015, an additional amendment to the Plan to provide an additional 7,750,000 shares was approved by AES' stockholders, bringing the total authorized shares to 45,750,000. The weighted average exercise price of Options outstanding under this plan included in Column (b) is $12.83 (excluding performance stock units, restricted stock units and director stock units), with 12,137,212 shares available for future issuance.
(b)The AES Corporation Second Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for directors provided for 2,000,000 shares authorized for issuance. Column (b) excludes the Director stock units granted thereunder. In conjunction with the 2010 amendment to the 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan, ongoing award issuance from this plan was discontinued in 2010 as Director stock units will be issued from the 2003 Long Term Compensation Plan. Any remaining shares under this plan, which are not reserved for



202 | 2021 Annual Report
issuance under outstanding awards, are not available for future issuance and thus the amount of 105,341 shares is not included in Column (c) above.
(2)Includes 2,386,991 (of which 354,091 are vested and 2,032,900 are unvested) shares underlying PSU and RSU awards (assuming 2019, 2020 and 2021 PSUs median performance), 1,592,092 shares underlying Director stock unit awards, and 1,579,327 shares issuable upon the exercise of Stock Option grants, for an aggregate number of 5,558,410 shares.
(2)
Includes 4,366,156 (of which 592,813 are vested and 3,773,343 are unvested) shares underlying PSU and RSU awards (assuming 2016 PSU median performance and 2017 and 2018 PSUs maximum performance), 1,646,376 shares underlying Director stock unit awards, and 3,782,068 shares issuable upon the exercise of Stock Option grants, for an aggregate number of 9,794,600 shares.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information regarding related party transactions required by this item iswill be included in the 20192022 Proxy Statement found under the headingsTransactions with Related PersonsPerson Policies and Procedures and Board and Committee Governance Matters and are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14 iswill be included in the 20192022 Proxy Statement under the headings Information Regarding The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Audit Fees, Audit Related Fees, and Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures and is incorporated herein by reference.




203 | 2021 Annual Report
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
(a)Financial Statements.
(a)
Financial Statements.
(b)Exhibits.
(b)
Exhibits.
3.1
3.2
43.3
3.4
4There are numerous instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term indebtedness of the Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries, none of which exceeds ten percent of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of such agreements to the Commission upon request. Since these documents are not required filings under Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Company has elected to file certain of these documents as Exhibits 4.(a)—4.(q)(j).
4.(a)
4.(b)
4.(c)
4.(d)
4.(e)
4.(f)
4.(g)
4.(h)
4.(i)
10.14.(d)
4.(e)
4.(f)
4.(g)
4.(h)
4.(i)
4.(j)
4.(k)
4.(l)
4.(m)
4.(n)



204 | 2021 Annual Report
10.1The AES Corporation Profit Sharing and Stock Ownership Plan are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(c)(1) of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-49262) filed on July 2, 1992. (P)
10.2The AES Corporation Incentive Stock Option Plan of 1991, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 (SEC File No. 00019281). (P)
10.3Applied Energy Services, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan of 1982 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-40483). (P)
10.4Deferred Compensation Plan for Executive Officers, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-40483). (P)
10.5
10.6
10.7The AES Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.63 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 (SEC File No. 00019281). (P)
10.7A
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.10A
10.11
10.12


10.13
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.18A
10.19
10.19A
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
10.2610.25



205 | 2021 Annual Report
10.26
10.27
10.28
10.27A
10.27B10.29
10.27C
10.27D
10.27E
10.28
10.2921.1
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
21.1
23.1
24
31.1


31.2
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.INS
101The AES Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, formatted in Inline XBRL Instance Document -(Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Cover Page, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (v) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (vi) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vii) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (filed herewith).
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (filed herewith).
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (filed herewith).and contained in Exhibit 101)
(c)Schedule
Schedule
Schedule I—Financial Information of Registrant




206 | 2021 Annual Report
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE AES CORPORATION
(Company)
Date:February 26, 201928, 2022By:
/s/   ANDRÉS GLUSKI        
Name:Andrés Gluski
President, Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NameTitleDate
Name*TitleDate
*President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
Andrés GluskiFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
*Director
Charles L. HarringtonJanet G. DavidsonFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
*Director
Kristina M. Johnson*DirectorFebruary 26, 2019
Tarun KhannaFebruary 28, 2022
*Director
Tarun Khanna*DirectorFebruary 26, 2019
*Director
Holly K. KoeppelFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
*Director
Julia M. LaulisFebruary 28, 2022
*Director
James H. MillerFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
*Director
Alain MoniéFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
*
Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director

John B. MorseFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
*Director
Moises NaimFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
*Director
Jeffrey W. UbbenTeresa M. SebastianFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
*Director
Maura ShaughnessyFebruary 28, 2022
/s/ GUSTAVO PIMENTASTEPHEN COUGHLINExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Gustavo PimentaStephen CoughlinFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
/s/ SARAH R. BLAKESHERRY L. KOHANVice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
Sarah R. BlakeSherry L. KohanFebruary 26, 201928, 2022

*By:/s/ PAUL L. FREEDMANFebruary 26, 201928, 2022
Attorney-in-fact



S-1 | 2021 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Schedules other than that listed above are omitted as the information is either not applicable, not required, or has been furnished in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto included in Item 8 hereof.

























See Notes to Schedule I





S-2 | 2021 Annual Report

THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT
BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020
 December 31,December 31,
 2018 201720212020
 (in millions)(in millions)
ASSETS    ASSETS
Current Assets:    Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $19
 $10
Cash and cash equivalents$40 $70 
Accounts and notes receivable from subsidiaries 285
 143
Accounts and notes receivable from subsidiaries231 188 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 31
 27
Prepaid expenses and other current assets50 55 
Total current assets 335
 180
Total current assets321 313 
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries and affiliates 6,834
 8,239
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries and affiliates7,159 6,426 
Office Equipment:    Office Equipment:
Cost 27
 27
Cost29 29 
Accumulated depreciation (19) (18)Accumulated depreciation(23)(22)
Office equipment, net 8
 9
Office equipment, net
Other Assets:    Other Assets:
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization 3
 3
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4 and $2, respectively 4
 5
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $7 and $6, respectivelyDeferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $7 and $6, respectively
Deferred income taxes 24
 289
Deferred income taxes— 25 
Other assets 2
 2
Other assets33 20 
Total other assets 33
 299
Total other assets39 49 
Total assets $7,210
 $8,727
Total assets$7,525 $6,795 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:    Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $15
 $18
Accounts payable$17 $15 
Accounts and notes payable to subsidiaries 74
 381
Accounts and notes payable to subsidiaries161 184 
Accrued and other liabilities 206
 246
Accrued and other liabilities340 344 
Senior notes payable—current portion 5
 5
Total current liabilities 300
 650
Total current liabilities518 543 
Long-term Liabilities:    Long-term Liabilities:
Senior notes payable 3,650
 4,625
Senior notes payable3,729 3,430 
Accounts and notes payable to subsidiaries 28
 967
Accounts and notes payable to subsidiaries— 28 
Other long-term liabilities 24
 20
Other long-term liabilities480 160 
Total long-term liabilities 3,702
 5,612
Total long-term liabilities4,209 3,618 
Stockholders' equity:    Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stockPreferred stock825 — 
Common stock 8
 8
Common stock
Additional paid-in capital 8,154
 8,501
Additional paid-in capital7,119 7,561 
Accumulated deficit (1,005) (2,276)Accumulated deficit(1,089)(680)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (2,071) (1,876)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(2,220)(2,397)
Treasury stock (1,878) (1,892)Treasury stock(1,845)(1,858)
Total stockholders' equity 3,208
 2,465
Total stockholders' equity2,798 2,634 
Total liabilities and equity $7,210
 $8,727
Total liabilities and equity$7,525 $6,795 

See Notes to Schedule I.




S-3 | 2021 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021, 2020, AND 2019
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016For the Years Ended December 31,202120202019
 (in millions)(in millions)
Revenue from subsidiaries and affiliates $36
 $28
 $14
Revenue from subsidiaries and affiliates$28 $29 $30 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries and affiliates 1,909
 630
 (615)Equity in earnings of subsidiaries and affiliates(47)383 674 
Interest income 39
 49
 19
Interest income20 31 53 
General and administrative expenses (142) (158) (144)General and administrative expenses(121)(125)(148)
Other income 25
 5
 7
Other income51 26 
Other expense 
 (554) (65)Other expense(65)(6)(103)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (171) (92) (14)Loss on extinguishment of debt— (146)(5)
Interest expense (220) (317) (344)Interest expense(74)(163)(197)
Income (loss) before income taxes 1,476
 (409) (1,142)Income (loss) before income taxes(208)29 305 
Income tax benefit (expense) (273) (752) 12
Income tax benefit (expense)(201)17 (2)
Net income (loss) $1,203
 $(1,161) $(1,130)Net income (loss)$(409)$46 $303 
See Notes to Schedule I.



S-4 | 2021 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, AND 20162019
2018 2017 2016202120202019
(in millions)(in millions)
NET INCOME (LOSS)$1,203
 $(1,161) $(1,130)NET INCOME (LOSS)$(409)$46 $303 
Foreign currency translation activity:     Foreign currency translation activity:
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax benefit of $2, $11 and $1, respectively(214) 18
 117
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0, $(8) and $1, respectivelyForeign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0, $(8) and $1, respectively(86)— (23)
Reclassification to earnings, net of $0 income tax for all periods(21) 643
 992
Reclassification to earnings, net of $0 income tax for all periods192 23 
Total foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax(235) 661
 1,109
Total foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax(83)192 — 
Derivative activity:     Derivative activity:
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $16, $13 and $(5), respectively(64) (14) 2
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(13), $1 and $1, respectively78
 37
 28
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit of $8, $90 and $53, respectivelyChange in derivative fair value, net of income tax benefit of $8, $90 and $53, respectively(7)(309)(202)
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $73, $19 and $4, respectivelyReclassification to earnings, net of income tax expense of $73, $19 and $4, respectively254 72 36 
Total change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax14
 23
 30
Total change in fair value of derivatives, net of tax247 (237)(166)
Pension activity:     Pension activity:
Prior service cost for the period, net of income tax expense of $1, $1 and $5, respectively(2) 1
 9
Change in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(1), $6 and $10, respectively2
 (20) (22)
Reclassification of earnings, net of income tax benefit (expense) of $(2), $(126) and $2, respectively7
 248
 1
Prior service cost for the period, net of income tax expense of $0, $1 and $0, respectivelyPrior service cost for the period, net of income tax expense of $0, $1 and $0, respectively— — 
Change in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(9), $4 and $6, respectivelyChange in pension adjustments due to net actuarial gain (loss) for the period, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(9), $4 and $6, respectively23 (12)(16)
Reclassification of earnings, net of income tax expense of $3, $0 and $13, respectivelyReclassification of earnings, net of income tax expense of $3, $0 and $13, respectively— 27 
Total change in unfunded pension obligation7
 229
 (12)Total change in unfunded pension obligation24 (12)12 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)(214) 913
 1,127
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)188 (57)(154)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)$989
 $(248) $(3)COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)$(221)$(11)$149 
See Notes to Schedule I.



S-5 | 2021 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021, 2020, AND 2019
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016For the Years Ended December 31,202120202019
 (in millions)(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities $409
 $148
 $818
Net cash provided by operating activities$570 $434 $583 
Investing Activities:      Investing Activities:
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of expenses 1,222
 
 
Proceeds from the sale of business interests, net of expenses64 412 196 
Investment in and net advances to subsidiaries (216) (339) (650)Investment in and net advances to subsidiaries(2,260)(652)(596)
Return of capital 242
 243
 247
Return of capital698 346 411 
Additions to property, plant and equipment (13) (13) (12)Additions to property, plant and equipment(14)(8)(8)
Purchase of short term investments, netPurchase of short term investments, net— (1)— 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 1,235
 (109) (415)Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(1,512)97 
Financing Activities:      Financing Activities:
(Repayments) Borrowings under the revolver, net (207) 207
 
(Repayments) Borrowings under the revolver, net295 (110)180 
Borrowings of notes payable and other coupon bearing securities 1,000
 1,025
 500
Borrowings of notes payable and other coupon bearing securities— 3,397 — 
Repayments of notes payable and other coupon bearing securities (1,933) (1,353) (808)Repayments of notes payable and other coupon bearing securities— (3,366)(450)
Loans from (Repayments to) subsidiaries (143) 309
 183
Loans from (Repayments to) subsidiaries— 25 40 
Purchase of treasury stock 
 
 (79)
Issuance of preferred stockIssuance of preferred stock1,014 — — 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 7
 1
 1
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Common stock dividends paid (344) (317) (290)Common stock dividends paid(401)(381)(362)
Payments for deferred financing costs (11) (12) (12)Payments for deferred financing costs(4)(38)(3)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests 
 
 (2)
Sales to noncontrolling interestsSales to noncontrolling interests(1)— — 
Other financing (5) (7) (3)Other financing(3)(4)
Net cash used in financing activities (1,636) (147) (510)Net cash used in financing activities912 (472)(593)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 1
 6
 1
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash— — (1)
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 9
 (102) (106)Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(30)59 (8)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning 10
 112
 218
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning70 11 19 
Cash and cash equivalents, ending $19
 $10
 $112
Cash and cash equivalents, ending$40 $70 $11 
Supplemental Disclosures:      Supplemental Disclosures:
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized $232
 $282
 $296
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized$79 $156 $192 
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds $10
 $2
 $6
Cash payments (refunds) for income taxesCash payments (refunds) for income taxes— (8)(5)
See Notes to Schedule I.



S-6 | 2021 Annual Report
THE AES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I
NOTES TO SCHEDULE I
1. Application of Significant Accounting Principles
The Schedule I Condensed Financial Information of the Parent includes the accounts of The AES Corporation (the “Parent Company”) and certain holding companies.
ACCOUNTING FOR SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES — The Parent Company has accounted for the earnings of its subsidiaries on the equity method in the financial information.
INCOME TAXES — Positions taken on the Parent Company's income tax return which satisfy a more-likely-than-not threshold will be recognized in the financial statements. The income tax expense or benefit computed for the Parent Company reflects the tax assets and liabilities on a stand-alone basis and the effect of filing a consolidated U.S. income tax return with certain other affiliated companies as well as effects of U.S. tax law reform enacted in 2017.
ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM SUBSIDIARIES — Amounts have been shown in current or long-term assets based on terms in agreements with subsidiaries, but payment is dependent upon meeting conditions precedent in the subsidiary loan agreements.
2. Debt
Senior and SecuredUnsecured Notes and Loans Payable ($ in millions)
December 31,
Interest RateMaturity20212020
Senior Unsecured Note3.30%2025900 900 
Drawings on revolving credit facilityLIBOR + 1.75%2026365 70 
Senior Unsecured Note1.375%2026800 800 
Senior Unsecured Note3.95%2030700 700 
Senior Unsecured Note2.45%20311,000 1,000 
Unamortized (discounts)/premiums & debt issuance (costs)(36)(40)
Total$3,729 $3,430 
      December 31,
  Interest Rate Maturity 2018 2017
Senior Unsecured Note 8.00% 2020 $
 $228
Senior Unsecured Note 7.38% 2021 
 690
Drawings on secured credit facility LIBOR + 2.00% 2021 
 207
Senior Unsecured Note 4.00% 2021 500
 
Senior Secured Term Loan LIBOR + 1.75% 2022 366
 521
Senior Unsecured Note 4.50% 2023 500
 
Senior Unsecured Note 4.88% 2023 713
 713
Senior Unsecured Note 5.50% 2024 63
 738
Senior Unsecured Note 5.50% 2025 544
 573
Senior Unsecured Note 6.00% 2026 500
 500
Senior Unsecured Note 5.13% 2027 500
 500
Unamortized (discounts)/premiums & debt issuance (costs)     (31) (40)
Subtotal     $3,655
 $4,630
Less: Current maturities     (5) (5)
Total     $3,650
 $4,625

FUTURE MATURITIES OF RECOURSE DEBT — As of December 31, 20182021 scheduled maturities are presented in the following table (in millions):
December 31,Annual Maturities
2019$5
20205
2021505
2022350
20231,213
Thereafter1,608
Unamortized (discount)/premium & debt issuance (costs)(31)
Total debt$3,655

December 31,Annual Maturities
2022$— 
2023— 
2024— 
2025900 
20261,165 
Thereafter1,700 
Unamortized (discount)/premium & debt issuance (costs)(36)
Total debt$3,729 
3. Dividends from Subsidiaries and Affiliates
Cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries were $1.9 billion, $1.2$894 million, $1 billion, and $1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively. For the yearyears ended December 31 2018, $1.2 billion2021, 2020, and 2019, $65 million, $302 million, and $200 million, respectively, of the dividends paid to the Parent Company are derived from the sale of business interests and are classified as an investing activity for cash flow purposes. All other dividends are classified as operating activities. There were no cash dividends received from affiliates accounted for by the equity method for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016.2019.



4. Guarantees and Letters of Credit
GUARANTEES — In connection with certain of its project financing, acquisitionacquisitions and dispositions, power purchasepurchases and other agreements, the Parent Company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments, most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events. These obligations and commitments, excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below, were limited



S-7 | 2021 Annual Report
as of December 31, 20182021 by the terms of the agreements, to an aggregate of approximately $712 million,$2.2 billion, representing 3490 agreements with individual exposures ranging up to $157$400 million. These amounts exclude normal and customary representations and warranties in agreements for the sale of assets (including ownership in associated legal entities) where the associated risk is considered to be nominal.
LETTERS OF CREDIT — At December 31, 2018,2021, the Parent Company had $78$48 million in letters of credit outstanding under the senior securedrevolving credit facility, representing 2326 agreements with individual exposures up to $49$16 million, and $368$119 million in letters of credit outstanding under the senior unsecured credit facility,facilities, representing 1031 agreements with individual exposures ranging from $1 millionup to $247$42 million. During 2018,the year ended December 31, 2021, the Parent Company paid letter of credit fees ranging from 1% to 3% per annum on the outstanding amounts.

S-7