We are a diversified mortgage and real estate services business. We provide mortgage insurance and other products and services to the real estate and mortgage finance industries through our two business segments—Mortgage Insurance and Services.Real Estate. While we manage and report on these two segments separately, we take an enterprise approach both externally and internally under our “One Radian” strategy, which leverages the value of our employees across our diversified businesses to better serve our customers under a unified brand. Our Mortgage Insurance segment provides credit-related insurance coverage, principally through private mortgage insurance, as well as other credit risk management and contract underwriting solutions to mortgage lending institutions and mortgage credit investors. Our ServicesReal Estate segment is primarily a fee-for-service business that offers a broad array of real estate, titleproducts and mortgage services to market participants across the real estate value chain. Our Real Estate services include title, valuation, asset management and other real estate services offered primarily to mortgage lenders, mortgage and real estate value chain. We offer these services primarily to mortgage lenders, financial institutions, investors, GSEs, real estate brokers and government entities. In addition, we provide title insurance and settlement services to mortgage lenders as well as directly to consumers. Prior to our January 2020 sale of Clayton, our mortgage services included transaction management services such as loan review, RMBS securitization and distressed asset reviews as well as servicer and loan surveillance.agents. See Note 71 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the salefurther descriptions of Clayton.our businesses.
Radian Group serves as the holding company for our insurance and other subsidiaries, through which we offer our products and services, and does not have any operations of its own.
The above references to our website and the SEC’s website do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websites and such information should not be considered part of this document.
As a seller of mortgage credit protection and other credit risk management solutions, as well as a provider of real estate title and mortgage services, the demand for our products and services is largely driven by the macroeconomic environment generally, and more specifically by the health of the housing, mortgage finance and related real estate markets. Throughout 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has created periods of significant economic disruption, high unemployment, volatility and disruption in financial markets, and required adjustments in the housing finance system and real estate markets. As such, beginning in the second quarter of 2020, our businesses have been negatively affected by the unprecedented and continually evolving impacts associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including as further described below by a material increase in mortgage defaults triggered by the rapid and significant rise in unemployment. Despite these negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, mortgage originations were strong throughout 2020, as a result of both a strong purchase market and a significant increase in refinance originations driven largely by lower interest rates, and we believe that the long-term housing market fundamentals and outlook remain positive. In Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, see “Overview—Operating Environment” and “Mortgage Insurance Portfolio—New Insurance Written” for additional information about recent trends and our future outlook.
The environment for private mortgage insurers is highly competitive, with private mortgage insurers competing primarily on the basis of price, underwriting guidelines, overall service, customer relationships, perceived financial strength and reputation. In addition to other private mortgage insurers, we compete with governmental agencies, principally the FHA and the VA. See “Mortgage Insurance—Competition.”“Competition” for additional information.
In addition to the transformation of pricing frameworks, in recent years, participants in the private mortgage insurance industry have engaged in a range of risk distribution strategies. Instrategies to manage risk associated with retained credit risk. Among other benefits, risk distribution reduces our required capital, lowers our overall cost of capital and enhances our projected return on capital. We use reinsurance in our mortgage insurance business Radian uses reinsurance as a capital and risk management tool to lower the risk profile and financial volatility of our mortgage insurance portfolio through economic cycles. Among other benefits, risk distribution reduces our required capital, lowers our overall cost of capital and enhances our projected return on capital. As the industry continues to evolve from a model where private mortgage insurers “originate and hold” risk to an “aggregate, manage and distribute” risk model, we expect to continue to utilize multiple forms of risk distribution, subject to cost, availability and other factors. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview—Mortgage Insurance Portfolio—Risk Distribution.Distribution.”
The macroeconomic conditions and other events that impact the housing, mortgage finance and related real estate markets also affect the demand for the products and services we offer through our Services business segment.Real Estate business. Sales volume in our ServicesReal Estate business varies based on the overall activity in the housing and mortgage finance markets and the health of related industries. We believe that the combinationSee “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of our mortgage insurance business with the unique setFinancial Condition and Results of diversified services provided through our Services segment provides us with an opportunity to become increasingly more relevant to our customers and that this combination serves as a competitive differentiatorOperations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Real Estate” for us compared to other private mortgage insurance companies.additional information.
Defaults and Claims
Defaults. Defaults
In our Mortgage Insurance segment, the default and claim cycle begins with the receipt of a default notice from the loan servicer. We consider a loan to be in default for financial statement and internal tracking purposes upon receipt of notification by servicers that a borrower has missed two monthly payments. Defaults can occur due to a variety of specific events affecting borrowers, including death or illness, divorce or other family problems, unemployment, factors impacting regional economic conditions (e.g., pandemics, epidemics and other disasters such as hurricanes, floods wildfires or other natural disasters)and wildfires) or other events.
The default rate in our mortgage insurance business is subject to seasonality. Historically, our mortgage insurance business experiences a fourth quarter seasonal increase in the number of defaults and a first quarter seasonal decline in the number of defaults and increase in the number of Cures. While historically this has been the case, macroeconomic factors in any given period may influence the default rate in our mortgage insurance business more than seasonality.
Currently, a segment of U.S. residential mortgage loans may be eligible for certain types of relief as a result of the legislative response to COVID-19, including the CARES Act. The loans from our origination years after 2008 possess significantly improved credit characteristics compared to our portfolio originated inCARES Act provides a temporary foreclosure and eviction moratorium for residential mortgagors with certain federally or GSE-backed mortgages. These moratoriums have been extended through the years prior to and including 2008, including higher average FICO scores for theaction of relevant federal agencies. Additionally, upon request by borrowers of federally or GSE-backed mortgage loans who attest to financial hardship related to the pandemic, the CARES Act requires mortgage servicers to provide these insured mortgages. In addition, refinancingsborrowers with up to 180 days forbearance on their mortgage payments, which may be extended for an additional 180 days upon request. There is no end date under the HARP or HARP Replacement Programs have positively impactedCARES Act for when the overall credit quality and composition180 days forbearance must initially be offered. The permissible forbearance period of our mortgage insurance portfolio because12 months under the refinancing generally results in terms under which a borrowerCARES Act has a greater ability to pay and more financial flexibility to cover the loan obligations. Our portfolio of business written after 2008 is now the predominant portion of our total primary RIF. The sum of our policies written after 2008 through 2019 and our refinancings under HARP accounted for approximately 95% of our total primary RIF at December 31, 2019, compared to 94% at December 31, 2018.
The following table shows the states that have generated the highest number of primary insurance defaults (measured as of December 31, 2019) in our insured portfoliobeen lengthened by various federal agencies and the corresponding percentage of total defaults aslength of the dates indicated:period varies depending on the agency and type of mortgage at issue. See “Regulation—Federal Regulation—CARES Act.” Although the scope of the effects on Radian’s business from the CARES Act and related federally mandated relief is not yet known, these relief options could cause a backlog of defaults and foreclosures with uncertain timelines for cures or continued defaults that could lead to insurance claims.
Additionally, in response to COVID-19, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac announced temporary servicing guidelines to ensure servicers can assist borrowers impacted by COVID-19. We have published interim servicing guidance aligning with the GSEs’ initiatives for borrowers experiencing a COVID-19 related hardship, including the GSEs’ payment deferral program and suspensions of foreclosures and evictions. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| States with highest number of defaults: | | | | | | | | | |
Texas (1) | 2,063 |
| | 9.7 | % | | 1,779 |
| | 8.4 | % | | 2,885 |
| | 10.3 | % |
Florida (1) | 1,853 |
| | 8.7 |
| | 2,023 |
| | 9.6 |
| | 5,337 |
| | 19.1 |
|
| California | 1,343 |
| | 6.3 |
| | 1,214 |
| | 5.8 |
| | 1,264 |
| | 4.5 |
|
| Illinois | 1,282 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 1,230 |
| | 5.8 |
| | 1,283 |
| | 4.6 |
|
| New York | 1,076 |
| | 5.1 |
| | 1,241 |
| | 5.9 |
| | 1,588 |
| | 5.7 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Certain areas within these states were FEMA Designated Areas associated with Hurricanes Harvey and Irma and, as a result, defaults in these states were elevated at December 31, 2017. |
Claims. Defaulted loans that fail to become current, or “cure,” may result in a claim under our mortgage insurance policies. Mortgage insurance claim volume is influenceddetermined by the circumstances surrounding the default. The rate at which defaults cure, or do not go to claim, depends in large part on a borrower’s financial resources and circumstances (including whether the borrower is eligible for a loan modification), local housing prices (i.e., whether borrowers are able to cure defaults by selling the property in full satisfaction of all amounts due under the mortgage), interest rates, unemployment and other factors impacting regional economic conditions.
In our first-lien primary insurancePrimary Mortgage Insurance business, in order to submit a claim, the insured must first either acquire title to the property (typically through a foreclosure proceeding) before submittingor we must approve a claim.third-party sale of the property. The time for a lender to acquire title to a property through foreclosure varies depending on the state, and in particular whether a state requires a lender to proceed through the judicial system in order to complete the foreclosure. Following the financial crisis of 2007-2008, the average time betweenthat it took for us to receive a defaultclaim increased, due in part to loss mitigation protocols that were established by servicers and also due to a request for claim payment increased, largelysignificant backlog of foreclosure proceedings in many states. Although these delays lessened as the economy recovered from that financial crisis, we may experience similar delays as a result of foreclosure delays due to, among other factors, increased scrutiny within the mortgage servicing industryCOVID-19-related relief programs. For example, payment and foreclosure process. These delays have lessened asforbearance programs instituted at the economy has recovered fromfederal and state levels in response to the financial crisis. COVID pandemic could again cause defaulted loans to remain in our defaulted loan inventory for a protracted period of time before we receive a claim. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—An extension in the period of time that a loan remains in our defaulted loan inventory may increase the severity of claims that we ultimately are required to pay.”
For Pool Mortgage Insurance, which represents less than 1% of our RIF at December 31, 2019,2020, our policies typically require the insured to not only acquire title but also to actively market and ultimately liquidate the real estate asset before filing a claim, which generally lengthens the time between a default and a claim submission.
Claim activity is not spread evenly throughout the coverage period of a book of business. Historically, except for prime businessperiods of economic distress, we have experienced relatively few claims are received during the first two years following issuance of a policy. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—NIW, IIF, RIF—Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019—Provision for Losses” for additional detail on net claims paid.
In addition to claim volume, Claim Severity is another significant factor affecting losses. We calculate the Claim Severity by dividing the claim paid amount by the original coverage amount. Factors that impact the severity of a claim include, but are not limited to, the size of the loan, the amount of mortgage insurance coverage placed on the loan, the amount of time between
default and claim during which we are expected to cover certain interest (capped at two years under our Prior Master Policy and capped at three years under our 2014 and 2020 Master Policies) and expenses, and the impact of our Loss Mitigation and other loss management activities with respect to the loan. Pre-foreclosureHome price appreciation as well as pre-foreclosure sales, acquisitions and other early workout efforts help to reduce overall Claim Severity, as do actions we may take to reduce a claim payment due to servicer negligence, as discussed below in “Claims Management.” See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—NIW, IIF, RIF——Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019—Provision for Losses.”
Claims Management
Our claims management process is focused on analyzing and processing claims to ensure that we pay valid claims in accordance with our policies. Our mortgage insurance claims management department pursues opportunities to mitigate losses both before and after claims are received.
Claims. In our mortgage insurance business, upon receipt of a valid claim, we have a range of settlement options for calculating the claim amount (also referred to as calculated loss), as set forth in our Master Policies. Most frequently, we settle a valid claim with the “Percentage Option” by paying the maximum liability and allowing the insured lender to keep title to the property. For this purpose, the maximum liability is determined by multiplying (x) the claim amount (which consists of the unpaid loan principal, plus past due interest for a period of time specified in our Master Policies, andplus certain expenses associated with the default)default, and minus certain deductions) by (y) the applicable coverage percentage. In addition, weWe also have the following alternative settlement options:
| |
(i) | Approved Sale Option: Pay the claim amount required to make the lender whole (not to exceed our maximum liability), taking into account the net proceeds received by the lender following an approved sale; |
| |
(ii) | Acquisition Option: Pay the entire claim amount and acquire title to the property; or |
| |
(iii) | Anticipated Loss Option: In certain circumstances, as outlined in our Master Policies, the claim calculation can include the claim amount minus the net proceeds we reasonably anticipate would be generated if the property, in its original condition on the effective insurance commitment date, reasonable wear and tear excepted, were sold to a third party for fair market value. |
(i)Approved Sale Option: Subject to any reduction provided for elsewhere in our policy, pay the claim amount not to exceed the lender’s entire loss or our maximum liability, taking into account the net proceeds received by the lender following an approved sale;
(ii)Acquisition Option: Subject to any reduction provided for elsewhere in our policy, pay the entire claim amount (as described above without application of the coverage percentage), upon the conveyance to us of good and marketable title to the property; or
(iii)Anticipated Loss Option: In certain circumstances, as outlined in our Master Policies, the settlement is based on the claim amount minus the net proceeds we reasonably anticipate would be generated if the property, in its original condition on the effective insurance commitment date, reasonable wear and tear excepted, were sold to a third party for fair market value.
Approved sales in which the underlying property has been sold for less than the outstanding loan amount are commonly referred to as “short sales.” Although short sales may have the effect of reducing our ultimate claim obligation, in many cases, a short sale will result in the payment of a claim in an amount that is equal to the maximum liability amount. Under our Master Policies, we retain the right to consent prior to the consummation of any short sales.sale. We have entered into agreements with each of the GSEs, pursuant to which we delegated to the GSEs our prior consent rights with respect to short sales on loans owned by the GSEs, as long as the short sales meet applicable GSE guidelines and processes for short sales and subject to certain other factors set forth in these agreements. We also provide for limited delegation authority to certain loan servicers for short sales under specific circumstances. For loans that are not owned by the GSEs and for which we have not granted specific delegation authority to the loan servicer, we perform an individual analysis of each proposed short sale and provide our consent to these sales when appropriate. Historically, we have consented to a short sale only after reviewing various factors, including among other items, the sale price relative to market and the ability of the borrower to contribute to any shortfall in the sale proceeds as compared to the outstanding loan amount.
After a claim is received, our loss management specialists may focus on:
■a review to determine compliance with applicable loan origination programs and our mortgage insurance policy requirements, including: (i) whether the loan qualified for insurance at the time the certificate of coverage was issued; (ii) whether the insured has satisfied its obligation in meeting all necessary conditions in order for us to pay a claim, including submitting all necessary documentation in connection with the claim (commonly referred to as “claim perfection”); and (iii) whether the loan was appropriately serviced in accordance with the standards set forth in our Master Policies;
■analysis and prompt processing to ensure that valid claims are paid in an accurate and timely manner;
■responses to loss mitigation opportunities presented by the insured; and
■management and disposal of acquired real estate.
Radian Guaranty has entered into a Factored Claim Administration Agreement with Fannie Mae that applies to certain loans owned by Fannie Mae that were insured under our Master Policies for which a claim is submitted on or after October 1, 2018. Pursuant to the agreement, for the loans subject to the agreement, Radian Guaranty will determine the amount of covered expenses forming part of a loss (other than unpaid principal balance and delinquent interest) using pre-negotiated expense factors. The expense factors are based on certain characteristics of each covered loan, including the unpaid principal balance at the time of default, property type and location, and property disposition.
Claim Denials.
We have the legal right under our Master Policies to deny a claim under certain conditions, such as when the loan servicer does not produce documents necessary to perfect a claim, including evidence that the insured has acquired title to the property, within the time period specified in our Master Policies. Most often, a Claim Denial is the result of a servicer’s failure to provide the loan origination file or other critical servicing documents for review. If, after requests by us, the loan origination file or other servicing documents are not provided to us, we generally deny the claim. If we deny a claim, we may continue to allow the insured the ability to perfect the claim for a limited period of time, as specified in our Master Policies. If the insured successfully perfects the claim on a timely basis, we will process the claim, including, as appropriate, by conducting a review of the loan file to ensure appropriatethat underwriting and loan servicing. servicing were conducted properly.
If, after completion of this process, we determine that the claim was not perfected, the insurance claim is denied and we consider the Claim Denial to be final and resolved. Although we may make a final determination internally with respect to a Claim Denial, it is possible that after we have a denied coverage a legal challenge to our decision to deny coverage may be brought within a period of time specified under the terms of our Master Policies.
Rescissions.
Mortgage insurance master policies generally protect mortgage insurers from the risk of material misrepresentations and fraud in the origination of an insured loan by establishing the right, under certain conditions, to unilaterally rescind coverage. Under the terms of our Master Policies, we have the legal right, under certain conditions, to unilaterally rescind coverage on our mortgage insurance policies. Typicaltypical events that may give rise to our right to rescind coverage include: (i) we insureinsured a loan under one of our Master Policies in reliance upon an application for insurance that contains a material misstatement, misrepresentation or omission, whether intentional or otherwise, or that was issued as a result of an act of fraud or (ii) we find that there was negligence in the origination of a loan that we insured. We also have rights of Rescission arising from a breach of the insured’s representations and warranties that are contained in our Master Policies or endorsements thereto and are required with our delegated underwriting program.
If we rescind coverage based on a determination that a loan did not qualify for insurance, we provide the insured with a period of time to challenge, or rebut, our decision. If a rebuttal to our Rescission is received and the insured provides additional information supporting the continuation (i.e., non-rescission) of coverage, we have the claim re-examined internally by a separate, independent investigator. If the additional information supports the continuation of coverage, the insurance is reinstated and if there is a claim, it proceeds to the next step in our claims review process. After completion of this process,Otherwise, if we determine that the loan did not qualify for coverage, the insurance certificate is rescinded (and we issue a premium refund under the terms of our Master Policies) and we consider the Rescission to be final and resolved. Although we may make a final determination internally with respect to a Rescission, it is possible that a legal challenge to our decision to rescind coverage may be brought after we have rescinded coverage during a period of time that is specified under the terms of our Master Policies.
In 2012, we began offering a limited rescission waiver program under our Prior Master Policy for our delegated underwriting customers, in which we agree not to rescind coverage due to non-compliance with our underwriting guidelines so long as the borrower makes 36 consecutive payments (commencing with the initial required payment) from his or her own funds. This program does not restrict our rights to rescind coverage in the event of fraud or misrepresentation in the origination of the loans we insure.
Following the financial crisis, the FHFA and the GSEs identified minimum standards and specific requirements to be included by allfor private mortgage insurers in theirinsurer master policies, for new mortgage insurance applications received on or after October 1, 2014. Among others, these included specific requirements relatedincluding rescission relief principles that limit the right to loss mitigation and claims processing activities thatrescind coverage when certain conditions are met. These rescission relief principles have limited the potential for Loss Mitigation Activity throughout the private mortgage insurance industry. Radian GuarantyIn accordance with these rescission relief principles, we have incorporated these principlesprovisions into itsour 2014 Master Policy. Radian Guaranty also offers 12-monthPolicy and 36-month2020 Master Policy that generally provide rescission relief programs in accordance withbased on the specified terms and conditions set forth in the 2014number of months that borrowers remain current on their mortgage loans. As a consequence, our rights to conduct Loss Mitigation Activity generally are more limited under these more recent Master Policies as compared to our Prior Master Policy. Loans that were already insured prior to the October 1, 2014 effective dateThe terms of the 2014 Master Policy continue to be subject to the terms and conditions of Radian Guaranty’s Prior Master Policy.
In 2017, the GSEs proposed revised GSE Rescission Relief Principles to, among other things, further clarify the circumstances under which mortgage insurers may rescind coverage, and required mortgage insurers to implement these principles into their master policies. Radian Guaranty incorporated these principles into its 2020 Master Policy. Under the 2020 Master Policy a loan will remain eligible to qualify for 36-monthdo not limit Radian Guaranty’s rights and remedies under certain life-of-loan reservation of rescission relief on the same terms as are set forthrights specified in the 2014 Master Policy. Underpolicy, including fraud and certain patterns of fraud. See "Item 1A. Risk Factors—Changes in the 2020 Master Policy, Radian Guaranty has also included a new 60-month rescission relief program that provides that a loan may be eligible to qualify for rescission relief even if the loan failed to meet the conditions required to
receive 36-month rescission relief. Applications received prior to March 1, 2020, the effective datecharters, business practices, or role of the 2020 Policy, will continue to be administered under Radian Guaranty’s 2014 Master Policy.GSEs in the U.S. housing market generally, could significantly impact our businesses.”
Claim Curtailments.
We also have rights under our Master Policies to curtail, and in some circumstances, deny claims due to servicer negligence. Examples of servicer negligence may include, without limitation:
■a failure to report information to us on a timely basis as required under our Master Policies;
■a failure to pursue loss mitigation opportunities presented by borrowers, realtors and/or any other interested parties;
■a failure to pursue loan modifications and/or refinancings through programs available to borrowers or an undue delay in presenting claims to us (including as a result of improper handling of foreclosure proceedings), which increases the interest or other components of a claim we are required to pay; and
■a failure to initiate and diligently pursue foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings within the timeframe specified in our Master Policies.
Although we could seek post-claim recoveries from the beneficiaries of our policies if we later determine that a claim was not valid, because our loss mitigation process is designed to ensure compliance with our policies prior to payment of a claim, historically we have not sought recoveries from the beneficiaries of our mortgage insurance policies once a claim payment has been made.
From time to time, claims management may result in disputes with our customers that ultimately produce litigation or other legal proceedings. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”Proceedings” and Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CustomersReal Estate
The principal customers of our mortgage insurance business are mortgage originators such as mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions and community banks.
Our largest single mortgage insurance customer (including branches and affiliates) measured by primary NIW, accounted for 7.2% of NIW during 2019, compared to 4.7% and 6.8% in 2018 and 2017, respectively. No customer had earned premiums that accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues in 2019, 2018 or 2017.
Since 2009, we have taken steps to diversify our customer base. As a result of these efforts, the percentage of NIW generated by our top 10 customers has decreased from 62.3% in 2009 to 34.3% in 2019. Since 2010, we have added over 900 net new customers and significantly increased the amount of business derived from mid-sized mortgage banks. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our NIW and franchise value could decline if we lose business from significant customers.”
Competition
We operate in the highly competitive U.S. mortgage insurance industry. Our competitors primarily include other private mortgage insurers and federal and state governmental agencies, principally the FHA and VA.
In addition to Radian Guaranty, the private mortgage insurers that are currently approved and eligible to write business for the GSEs are:
Arch MI (includes both Arch Mortgage Insurance Company and United Guaranty Residential Insurance Company);
Essent Guaranty, Inc.;
Genworth Financial, Inc.;
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation; and
NMI Holdings, Inc.
We compete directly with other private mortgage insurers primarily on the basis of price, underwriting guidelines, overall service, customer relationships, perceived financial strength (including comparative credit ratings) and reputation. Overall service competition is based on, among other things, effective and timely delivery of products, timeliness of claims payments, customer service, timely and accurate servicing of policies, training, loss mitigation efforts and management and field service expertise. We also believe that service includes our ability to offer services to customers through our Services business that complement our mortgage insurance products.
Pricing has always been and continues to be competitive in the mortgage insurance industry. We monitor various competitive and economic factors while seeking to enhance the long-term value of our portfolio by balancing credit risk, profitability, and volume and capital considerations in developing our pricing and origination strategies. We take a disciplined approach to establishing our premium rates and writing a mix of business that we expect to produce our desired level of NIW and our targeted level of returns on a blended basis. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage Insurance—Premiums.”As demonstrated by our strong NIW generated in 2019, we believe we remain well positioned to compete for the NIW being originated today, while at the same time maintaining projected returns on NIW within our targeted ranges. Based on publicly available information, we estimate that our share of NIW within the private mortgage insurance market (excluding refinancings under HARP) was approximately 18.6% for 2019.
Certain of our private mortgage insurance competitors currently have better financial strength ratings than we have and/or are subsidiaries of larger corporations, which may give them access to greater amounts of capital and financial resources than we do at a lower cost of capital (including via off-shore reinsurance vehicles). As a result, they may be better positioned to compete outside of traditional mortgage insurance, including in the private label securitization market or if the GSEs expand their use of, or pursue alternative forms of, credit enhancement outside of private mortgage insurance. In addition, because of tax advantages associated with being off-shore, certain of our competitors have been able to reinsure to their offshore affiliates and achieve higher after-tax rates of return on the NIW they write compared to mortgage insurers such as Radian Guaranty that do not have access to offshore affiliates, which could allow these off-shore competitors to leverage reduced pricing to gain market share while continuing to achieve acceptable returns on NIW.
We also compete with governmental agencies, principally the FHA and the VA. We compete with the FHA and VA on the basis of loan limits, pricing, credit guidelines, terms of our insurance policies and loss mitigation practices. Beginning in 2008, the FHA, which historically had not been a significant competitor, substantially increased its share of the mortgage insurance market to a high of approximately 74% in 2009. Since then, the private mortgage insurance industry generally has been recapturing market share from the FHA, primarily due to: (i) improvements in the financial strength of private mortgage insurers; (ii) the development of new products and marketing efforts directed at competing with the FHA; (iii) increases in the FHA’s pricing; (iv) the U.S. government’s pursuit of legal remedies against FHA-approved lenders related to loans insured by the FHA; and (v) various policy changes at the FHA, including the general elimination of the premium cancellation provision. We believe that better execution for borrowers with higher FICO scores, lender preference and the inability to cancel FHA insurance for certain loans are factors that continue to provide a competitive advantage for private mortgage insurers. Based on these factors and our current pricing strategies, we believe we are well-positioned to continue to effectively compete with the FHA. The FHA’s share of the total insured mortgage market (which includes FHA, VA and private mortgage insurers) was 29% in 2019, compared to 31% in 2018. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage Insurance—NIW; Origination Market; Penetration Rate.”
If the competitive position of the FHA is enhanced, it could have a negative effect on our ability to compete with the FHA. See “Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform”for a discussion of several recent developments and proposals that could impact the FHA’s competitive position, including reforms to the process for pursing legal remedies against lenders, efforts to reduce the market overlap between the FHA and the GSEs and proposed changes to the QM Rule that the CFPB is considering that could result in a broader QM definition for FHA loans than for GSE purchased loans, which could make the FHA a more attractive execution option.
We also have faced increasing competition from the VA. Based on publicly available information, the VA’s share of the total insured mortgage market was 26% in 2019, compared to 25% in 2018. We believe that the VA’s market share has generally been increasing because the VA offers 100% LTV loans and charges a one-time funding fee that can be included in the loan amount with no additional monthly expense, and because of an increase in the number of borrowers that are eligible for the VA’s program.
In addition, as market conditions change, alternatives to traditional private mortgage insurance may become more prevalent, which could reduce the demand for private mortgage insurance. These alternatives include structures commonly referred to as “investor paid mortgage insurance” in which affiliates of traditional mortgage insurers who are not subject to the PMIERs directly insure the GSEs against loss. For additional information about these structures, see “Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform.” It is difficult to predict what other types of credit risk transfer transactions and structures might be used by the GSEs in the future. If any of the credit risk transfer transactions and structures that are being developed were to displace standard primary loan level private mortgage insurance, the amount of insurance we write may be reduced.
See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our mortgage insurance business faces intense competition.”
Services
ServicesReal Estate Business Overview
Overview
Our ServicesReal Estate segment is primarily a fee-for-service business that offers a broad array of real estate, titleproducts and mortgage services to market participants across the real estate value chain. Our Real Estate services include title, valuation, asset management and other real estate services offered primarily to mortgage lenders, mortgage and real estate value chain, as described below.investors, GSEs, real estate brokers and agents. These services arehelp lenders, investors, consumers and real estate agents evaluate, manage, monitor, acquire and sell properties. As further described below, our Real Estate business is driven primarily provided to mortgage lenders, financial institutions, investorsby digital products and government entities. In addition, we provide title insuranceservices, including software as a service solutions and settlement services to mortgage lenders as well as directly to consumers.proprietary technology platforms.
A key element of our overall business strategy is to use our ServicesReal Estate segment to diversify our business and revenue streams by increasing our participation in multiple facets of the residential real estate and mortgage finance markets. We believe that the combination of our mortgage insurance business with our unique set of diversified real estate title and mortgage services capabilities provides us with an opportunity to become increasingly more relevant to our customers and is a competitive differentiator for us compared to other private mortgage insurance companies.
Beginning in 2017, we initiated a review of the strategic direction of the Services segment and made several decisions with respect to the business strategy that were designed to reposition this business to drive future growth and profitability. As a further step in repositioning the Services segment, we initiated a process in 2019 to evaluate a potential sale of Clayton, through which we provided mortgage services related to loan acquisition, RMBS securitization and distressed asset reviews and servicer and loan surveillance. This sale was completed in January 2020. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Clayton sale and the related financial impacts of the repositioning of our Services segment.
See also “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Services.”
Services Offered
Real Estate ServicesTitle Services. . Our real estate services help lenders, investors and real estate agents evaluate, manage, monitor and sell properties. These real estate services include software as a service solutions and platforms, as well as managed services. We provide asset management services, real estate valuation services and real estate brokerage services. Our asset management services and solutions are designed to support the management of the entire REO disposition process, including management of the eviction and redemption process, as well as property preservation and repairs. Our real estate valuation products include: full appraisal products; appraisal review products; hybrid/ancillary appraisal products; automated valuation products; interactive valuation products; and broker price opinions (BPOs). Our real estate brokerage services include technology solutions, real estate data products and real estate transaction services.
Title Services. We also offer a comprehensive suite of insurance and non-insurance title, closing and settlement services to mortgage lenders, mortgage investors and GSEs as well as directly to consumers for residential mortgage loans. We offerIn addition to title insurance, as well aswe offer a full complement of title services that include tax and title data services; centralized recording services; document retrieval; default curative title services; deed reports; and property reports. Our closing and settlement services include electronic execution of some or all mortgage loan closing documents in a digital environment (eClosing), includingranging from full eClosing to hybrid eClosing and remote eClosing, as well as more traditional signing services, centralized closing and settlement services and local closing and settlement services.
Mortgage ServicesValuation Services. We provide a suite of real estate valuation products and services to lenders, servicers, investors, GSEs and real estate agents. These products include: appraisal review products; hybrid/ancillary appraisal products; automated valuation products; interactive valuation products; and broker price opinions (BPOs). Following the sale of ClaytonSee “All Other” for additional information on our traditional appraisal services, which in JanuaryOctober 2020 our mortgage services primarily consist of services related to our single family rental business and contract underwriting to support our mortgage insurance customers.we announced we were winding down.
Asset Management Services. We provide asset management solutions to help investors and lenders improve execution on their real estate properties. These services include management of the entire REO disposition process, including the eviction and redemption process, as well as property preservation and repairs. We also offer a full range of services to supportthat serve the single family rental asset class. Our comprehensive single family rental services provide a centralized, single point of contact for facilitating the valuation, diligence and underwriting services needed to support single family rental securitizations, multi-borrower transactions and warehouse facilities.
We also offer contract underwriting services and compliance reviews to verify that loan file documentation conforms to specified guidelines and regulatory requirements. In our contract underwriting business we underwrite our customers’ mortgage loan application files for secondary market compliance (e.g., for sale to the GSEs), and may concurrently assess the file for mortgage insurance eligibility. Generally,addition, we offer limited indemnificationa web-based workflow solution to our contract underwriting customers. See “Mortgage Insurance—Mortgage Insurance Business Overview—Underwriting—Contract Underwriting.”
Prior to our January 2020 sale of Clayton, our mortgage services also included transaction management services such as loan review, RMBS securitization and distressed asset reviews as well as servicer and loan surveillance. We provided loan-levelassist in managing REO assets, rental properties, due diligence for various asset classes (residential, single family rentalbulk acquisitions, loss mitigation efforts and non-residential)short sales.
Other Real Estate Services. We offer other real estate products and services to assist agents in facilitating residential real estate transactions including software as well as servicer surveillancea service (SaaS) solutions, real estate data products and real estate transaction services.
services, risk management and servicing oversight solutions and asset representation review services in connection with securitizations.
ServicesReal Estate Revenue Drivers
Due to the nature of the services provided, our ServicesReal Estate arrangements with customers consist primarily of fixed-price contracts. Under fixed-price contracts, we agree to perform the specified services and deliverables for a pre-determined per-unit or per-file price or day rate.price. To a lesser extent, we utilize percentage-of-sale contracts, under which we are paid a contractual percentage of the sale proceeds upon the sale of each property. These contracts are only used for a portion of our REO management services and our real estate brokerage services. In addition to these fees for services, we earn net premiums on title insurance written by Radian Title Insurance.
In most cases, our contracts with our clients do not include minimum volume commitments and can be terminated at any time by our clients. Although some of our contracts and assignments are recurring in nature, and include repetitive monthly assignments, a significant portion of our engagements are transactional in nature and may be performed in connection with securitizations, loanreal estate purchases and sales, loan purchases or other transactions. Due to the transactional nature of our business, our ServicesReal Estate segment revenues may fluctuate from period to period as transactions are commenced or completed. In addition, our segment revenues are impacted by the volume of real estate transactions in the marketplace, which may fluctuate from period to period. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—We face risks associated with our Real Estate business.”
For additional information on the most significant revenue drivers forfactors affecting our ServicesReal Estate business, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Real Estate.”
All Other
All Other Overview
All Other activities include: (i) income (losses) from assets held by our holding company; (ii) related general corporate operating expenses not attributable or allocated to our reportable segments; (iii) for all periods prior to its sale in the first quarter of 2020, income and expenses related to Clayton; (iv) for all periods presented, the income and expenses related to our traditional appraisal services, as discussed below; and (v) other immaterial revenue and expense items. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the basis of our segment reporting, including the related allocations and the impacts of the sale of Clayton and subsequent organizational changes made in the first quarter of 2020, as well as the wind down of our traditional appraisal business, announced in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Sale of Clayton
We engaged in a process in 2019 to evaluate a potential sale of Clayton, through which we provided services related to loan acquisition, RMBS securitization and distressed asset reviews and servicer and loan surveillance. This sale was completed on January 21, 2020. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Clayton sale and the related financial impacts.
Appraisal Services
Through December 2020, we offered residential real estate appraisal services through a panel of independent contractor appraisers. Given the increased market demand for technology-driven solutions, in October 2020 we announced the wind down of this traditional appraisal business in order to focus on our digital valuation services, which are expected to produce higher growth.
Competition
Mortgage
We operate in the highly competitive U.S. mortgage insurance industry. Our competitors primarily include other private mortgage insurers and federal and state governmental agencies, principally the FHA and VA.
In addition to Radian Guaranty, the private mortgage insurers that are currently approved and eligible to write business for the GSEs are:
■Arch MI (includes both Arch Mortgage Insurance Company and United Guaranty Residential Insurance Company);
■Essent Guaranty, Inc.;
■Genworth Financial, Inc.;
■Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation; and
■NMI Holdings, Inc.
We compete directly with other private mortgage insurers primarily on the basis of price, underwriting guidelines, overall service, customer relationships, perceived financial strength (including comparative credit ratings) and reputation. Overall service competition is based on, among other things, effective and timely delivery of products, timeliness of claims payments, customer service, timely and accurate servicing of policies, training, loss mitigation efforts and management and field service expertise. For Radian, service also includes our ability to offer products and services to customers through our Real Estate business that are relevant to our mortgage insurance customers and complement our mortgage insurance products.
Pricing has always been and continues to be competitive in the mortgage insurance industry. We monitor various competitive and economic factors while seeking to enhance the long-term value of our portfolio by balancing credit risk, profitability, and volume and capital considerations in developing our pricing and origination strategies. We take a disciplined approach to establishing our premium rates and seek to write a mix of business that we expect to produce our desired level of NIW and our targeted level of returns on a blended basis. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage—Premiums.” Based on publicly available information, we estimate that our share of NIW within the private mortgage insurance market was approximately 18% for 2020.
Certain of our private mortgage insurance competitors currently have better financial strength ratings than we have and/or are subsidiaries of larger corporations, which may give them a competitive advantage.
We also compete with governmental agencies, principally the FHA and the VA. We compete with the FHA and VA on the basis of loan limits, pricing, credit guidelines, terms of our insurance policies and loss mitigation practices. Beginning in 2008, the FHA, which historically had not been a significant competitor, substantially increased its share of the mortgage insurance market
to a high of approximately 74% in 2009. Since then, the private mortgage insurance industry has recaptured market share from the FHA, primarily due to: (i) improvements in the financial strength of private mortgage insurers; (ii) the development of new products and marketing efforts directed at competing with the FHA; (iii) increases in the FHA’s pricing; (iv) the U.S. government’s pursuit of legal remedies against FHA-approved lenders related to loans insured by the FHA; and (v) various policy changes at the FHA, including the general elimination of the premium cancellation provision. We believe that better execution for borrowers with higher FICO scores, lender preference and the inability to cancel FHA insurance for certain loans have provided a competitive advantage for private mortgage insurers. The FHA’s share of the total insured mortgage market (which includes FHA, VA and private mortgage insurers) was reported to be 24% in 2020, compared to 29% in 2019. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage—NIW and Related Drivers.”
If the competitive position of the FHA is enhanced, it could have a negative effect on our ability to compete with the FHA. See “Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform and the GSEs’ Business Practices”for a discussion of several recent developments and proposals that could make the FHA a more attractive execution option and impact the FHA’s competitive position relative to private mortgage insurance.
We also have faced increasing competition from the VA. Based on publicly available information, the VA’s share of the total insured mortgage market was 32% in 2020, compared to 26% in 2019. We believe that the VA remains a strong participant in the overall market because the VA offers 100% LTV loans and charges a one-time funding fee that can be included in the loan amount with no separate monthly expense, and because of an increase in the number of borrowers that are eligible for the VA’s program.
In addition, as market conditions change, alternatives to traditional private mortgage insurance may become more prevalent, which could reduce the demand for private mortgage insurance. These alternatives include structures commonly referred to as “investor paid mortgage insurance” in which affiliates of traditional mortgage insurers who are not subject to the PMIERs directly insure the GSEs against loss. For additional information about these structures, see “Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform and the GSEs’ Business Practices.” It is difficult to predict what other types of credit risk transfer transactions and structures or other forms of credit enhancement, including GSE-sponsored alternatives to traditional mortgage insurance might be used in the future. If any of these alternatives were to displace standard primary loan level private mortgage insurance, the amount of insurance we write may be reduced and our future prospects could be negatively impacted.
See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our mortgage insurance business faces intense competition.”
Customers
We have a broad range of customers for our Services segment due to the breadth of services we are able to offer across the mortgage and real estate value chain. Our principal third-party customers are:
Mortgage originators such as mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions and community banks;
Aggregators, issuers and investors in RMBS, whole loans, and other mortgage-related debt instruments, including the GSEs, private equity, hedge funds, real estate investment trusts and investment banks;
Single family rental (SFR) lenders, warehouse line borrowers and SFR securitization issuers;
Mortgage servicers; and
Real estate brokers and agents.
Our customers include many of the largest financial institutions and participants in the mortgage sector and, as such, our services revenue is concentrated among our largest customers. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the top 10 Services customers generated approximately 33% of the Services segment’s services revenue.
CompetitionEstate
We believe our ServicesReal Estate business is uniquely positioned as a single provider of an array of products and services to participants across the residential mortgage and real estate value chain. We are not aware of any other mortgage insurance company that provides a comparable range of services to the residential mortgage and real estate industries. However, our ServicesReal Estate business has multiple competitors within each of its individual lines of business. Our competitors mainly include small privately-held companies and subsidiaries of large publicly-traded companies.
Following the sale of Clayton in January 2020, our mortgage services primarily consist of single family rental services, for which there are limited competitors, and services related to contract underwriting to support our mortgage insurance customers. Significant competitors for our real estate and title services businessesReal Estate business include:
| |
• | Real Estate Services - ClearCapital.com, Inc., CoreLogic, Inc., Pro Teck Valuation Intelligence, HouseCanary, Inc., First American Financial Corporation, Black Knight, Inc., VRM Mortgage Services, Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Xome Inc. and ServiceLink
|
| |
• | Title Services - First American Financial Corporation, Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Old Republic Title Insurance Group, Inc., Westcor Land Title Insurance Company andTitle Services – Fidelity National Title Insurance Company; First American Financial Corporation; First National Title Insurance Company; National Title Insurance Company; North American Title Insurance Company; Old Republic Title Insurance Group, Inc.; Stewart Title Guaranty Company; Westcor Land Title Insurance Company; WFG National Title Insurance Company |
25
Across all business lines in our Real Estate segment, we compete on the basis of industry expertise, price, technology, service levels and relationships. We believe that combining
Customers
Mortgage
The principal customers of our mortgage insurance business are mortgage originators such as mortgage banks, commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions and community banks.
Our largest single mortgage insurance customer (including branches and affiliates) measured by NIW, accounted for 13.3% of NIW during 2020, compared to 7.2% and 4.7% in 2019 and 2018, respectively. No customer contributed earned premiums that accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues in 2020, 2019 or 2018.
We actively monitor and have taken steps over time to diversify our customer base. As a result of these efforts, the percentage of NIW generated by our top 10 customers was 36.2% in 2020. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our NIW and franchise withvalue could decline if we lose business from significant customers.”
Real Estate
We have a broad range of customers for our diversified setReal Estate segment, including many of our Mortgage customers, due to the products and services we offer across the mortgage and real estate productsvalue chain. Our principal customers (non-affiliated) are:
■Mortgage originators such as mortgage banks, commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions and community banks;
■Aggregators, issuers and investors in RMBS, whole loans, and other mortgage-related debt instruments, including the GSEs, private equity, hedge funds, real estate investment trusts and investment banks;
■Single family rental (SFR) lenders, warehouse line borrowers and SFR securitization issuers;
■Mortgage servicers;
■Real estate brokers and agents; and
■Consumers
Our customers include many of the largest financial institutions and participants in the mortgage sector and, as such, our services provides us with an opportunity to become increasingly relevant to bothrevenue is concentrated among our Mortgage Insurance and Serviceslargest customers. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the top 10 Real Estate customers generated approximately 55.9% of the Real Estate segment’s services revenue.
Enterprise Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing efforts are focused on establishing, building and maintaining valuable customer relationships based on customer needs. We are focused on providing customized service and product expertise to our mortgage and real estate business partners, as well as enterprise sales and marketing support for customers who benefit from our spectrum of mortgage and real estate solutions. We expect that our enterprise approach to selling mortgage insurance together with the complementary products and services of our mortgage and real estate services businesses will strengthen our relationships with customers, attract new customers and enhance our ability to compete.
We offerOur One Radian enterprise sales model works with our customers and marketing support though a variety of channels:prospects across highly integrated sales teams:
■Our Mortgage sales teamSales Team is focused on developing new mortgage insurance relationships and is responsible for supporting our existing mortgage insurance relationships.
■Our Real Estate sales teamsSales Teams are focused on developing new relationships and expanding and supporting existing customer relationship in three areas: title services, asset management services, and valuation services.
■Our Enterprise Sales teamTeam focuses on selling Radian’s products and services across the mortgage and real estate value chain.
All sales efforts are supported by the following functional areas in order tothat provide variousadditional touch points for our customers, product education, risk management expertise and other customized support:
| |
• | ■Our Telesales Team serves customers using any and all of our products and services and is responsible for managing and growing customer relationships and promoting increased customer adoption. |
| |
• | Our Marketing and Communications Team partners with sales and business leaders to develop products and services and is responsible for managing and growing customer relationships and promoting increased customer adoption.
■Our Customer Service and Training Teams are both experienced and knowledgeable to provide service and educational sessions to our customers. We have designed training programs for our customers to help their employees develop the knowledge and skills to respond to changing market demands. Our learning solutions are provided to customers to promote the role of private mortgage insurance in the marketplace as well as to promote Radian’s specific products and offerings. We offer various options for training, including, instructor-led webinars and self-directed on-demand learning. ■Our Risk Management Teamoffers periodic reviews with customers of their insured mortgage portfolio, including detailed loan performance metrics and servicing portfolio performance. Our One Radian enterprise marketing and communication team: ■Our Marketing and Communications Team partners with sales and business leaders to develop programs and campaigns that provide increased opportunities for customers and address targeted segments of the market. We work closely with customers to understand their strategic priorities and business objectives while identifying opportunities that will enhance and complement the customers’ sales and marketing activities. |
| |
• | Our Customer Service and Training Teams are both experienced and knowledgeable to provide service and educational sessions to our customers. We have designed training programs for our customers to help their employees develop the knowledge and skills to respond to changing market demands. Our learning solutions are provided to customers to promote the role of private mortgage insurance in the marketplace as well as to promote Radian’s specific products and offerings. We offer three options for training: instructor-led classroom sessions, instructor-led webinars and self-directed on-demand learning.
|
| |
• | Our Risk Management Team offers periodic reviews with customers of their insured mortgage portfolio, including detailed loan performance metrics and servicing portfolio performance.
|
Our sales team consists of qualified mortgage and real estate professionals with significant experience and customer relationships. All sales personnel are compensated by salary and other incentive-based pay, which may be tied to the achievement of certain company and business objectives as well aswhile identifying opportunities that will enhance and complement the customers’ sales goals.and marketing activities.
Investment Policy and Portfolio
Our investment portfolio is our primary source of claims paying resources. We seek to manage our investment portfolio within our targeted risk and return tolerances based on our current liability projections and business and economic outlook to maintain sufficient liquidity within our risk and return tolerances andlevels to satisfy our operating requirements and other financial needs based on our current liabilities and business outlook.needs.
We have developed anOur investment strategy that uses an asset allocation methodology that considerstakes into consideration regulatory constraints, our business environment and consolidated risks as well as current investment conditions. With respect to our fixed income investments, the following internal investment policy guidelines, among others, are applied at the time of investment:
investment and continually monitored. |
| | | | | | | |
| NAIC Designation | | Ratings Equivalent | | Internal Policy |
| 1 | | “A-” and above | | At least 75% of Portfolio Marketthe portfolio Fair Value |
| 2 | | “BBB+” to “BBB-” | | Not more than 25% of Portfolio Marketportfolio Fair Value |
| 3 to 6 | | “BB+” and below | | Not more than 10% of Portfolio Marketportfolio Fair Value |
Our portfolio has been constructed to maximize long-term expected returns while maintaining an acceptable risk level. Our investment objectives are to utilize appropriate risk management oversight to optimize after-tax returns, while preserving capital. We targetcalibrate the level of our short-term investments to managebased on our overall investment portfolio duration, risk appetite and expected short-term cash requirements.
Our investment policies and strategies are subject to change, depending on regulatory, economic and market conditions and our then-existing or anticipated financial condition and operating requirements, including our current and future tax positions. The investments held at our insurance subsidiaries are also subject to insurance regulatory requirements applicable to such insurance subsidiaries.
Oversight responsibility of our investment portfolio rests with management, and allocations are set by periodic asset allocation studies, calibrated by risk return and after-tax return considerations. The risks we consider include, among others, duration, convexity, liquidity, market, sector, structural, interest rate and credit risks. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we internally manage 8.5%managed 4.7% of the investment portfolio (the portion of the portfolio largely consisting of U.S. Treasury securities, money market funds, equities and certain exchange-traded funds), with the remainder primarily managed by three external managers. External managers are selected by management based primarily upon the selected allocations, as well astheir ability to meet our investment goals and objectives, based upon factors such as historical returns and the stability of their management teams. Management’s selections of external managers are presented to and approved by the Finance and Investment Committee of Radian Group’sour board of directors.
At December 31, 2019,2020, our investment portfolio had a cost basis of $5.5$6.4 billion and a carrying value of $5.7$6.8 billion. Our investment portfolio did not include any direct residential real estate or whole mortgage loans at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2019, 97.2%2020, 97.1% of our investment portfolio was rated investment grade. The weighted-average duration of the assets in our investment portfolio as of December 31, 20192020 was 4.04.7 years. For additional information about our investment portfolio, see the information that follows,“Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Investment Portfolio”, as well as Notes 5 and 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Investment Portfolio Diversification
The composition of our investment portfolio, presented as a percentage of overall fair value at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Fair Value | | Percent | | Fair Value | | Percent |
| ($ in millions) | | | | | | | |
| Corporate bonds and commercial paper | $ | 2,554.8 |
| | 44.6 | % | | $ | 2,738.2 |
| | 52.9 | % |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities | 795.5 |
| | 13.9 |
| | 353.2 |
| | 6.8 |
|
| Other asset-backed securities | 759.1 |
| | 13.3 |
| | 705.5 |
| | 13.6 |
|
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 642.8 |
| | 11.2 |
| | 591.4 |
| | 11.4 |
|
| U.S. government and agency securities | 342.1 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 227.7 |
| | 4.4 |
|
State and municipal obligations (1) | 260.4 |
| | 4.5 |
| | 324.8 |
| | 6.3 |
|
| Money market instruments and certificates of deposit | 203.5 |
| | 3.5 |
| | 96.2 |
| | 1.9 |
|
| Equity securities | 157.7 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 140.6 |
| | 2.7 |
|
| Other investments | 9.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 3.4 |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 5,725.2 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,181.0 |
| | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Primarily consists of taxable state and municipal investments. |
Investment Portfolio Scheduled Maturity
The following table shows the scheduled maturities of the securities held in our investment portfolio at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Fair Value | | Percent | | Fair Value | | Percent |
| ($ in millions) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments | $ | 533.4 |
| | 9.3 | % | | $ | 538.8 |
| | 10.4 | % |
Due in one year or less (1) | 166.8 |
| | 2.9 |
| | 87.3 |
| | 1.7 |
|
Due after one year through five years (1) | 961.1 |
| | 16.8 |
| | 1,118.8 |
| | 21.6 |
|
Due after five years through ten years (1) | 1,134.1 |
| | 19.8 |
| | 1,125.5 |
| | 21.7 |
|
Due after ten years (1) | 570.6 |
| | 10.0 |
| | 517.3 |
| | 10.0 |
|
RMBS (2) | 795.5 |
| | 13.9 |
| | 353.2 |
| | 6.8 |
|
CMBS (2) | 642.8 |
| | 11.2 |
| | 591.4 |
| | 11.4 |
|
Other ABS (2) | 759.1 |
| | 13.3 |
| | 704.7 |
| | 13.6 |
|
Other investments (3) | 161.8 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 144.0 |
| | 2.8 |
|
Total (4) | $ | 5,725.2 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,181.0 |
| | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Actual maturities may differ as a result of calls before scheduled maturity. |
| |
(2) | RMBS, CMBS and other ABS are shown separately, as they are not due at a single maturity date. |
| |
(3) | No stated maturity date. |
| |
(4) | At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, includes $66.4 million and $27.9 million, respectively, of securities loaned to third-party borrowers under securities lending agreements, classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. |
Investment Portfolio by Rating
The following table provides the ratings of our investment portfolio, presented as a percentage of overall fair value, as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Fair Value | | Percent | | Fair Value | | Percent |
| ($ in millions) | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government / AAA | $ | 2,339.9 |
| | 40.9 | % | | $ | 1,711.7 |
| | 33.0 | % |
| AA | 932.6 |
| | 16.3 |
| | 878.8 |
| | 17.0 |
|
| A | 1,506.5 |
| | 26.3 |
| | 1,498.9 |
| | 28.9 |
|
| BBB | 784.4 |
| | 13.7 |
| | 936.0 |
| | 18.1 |
|
| Equity securities and other assets | 161.8 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 155.6 |
| | 3.0 |
|
| Total | $ | 5,725.2 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,181.0 |
| | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Enterprise Risk Management
Risk Philosophy, Vision and Appetite
As a financial services organization, risk management is a critical part of our business. The following goals guide our strategy and actions as a risk management organization:
■Embed and continually reinforce a disciplined, corporate-wide risk culture that utilizes an understanding of risk/return tradeoffs to drive quality decisions utilizing a disciplined approach designed toand achieve long-term, through-the-cycle profitability;
■Maintain credit, underwriting, pricing and risk/return disciplines based on sound data and analytics and continuous feedback throughout the organization;
■Proactively monitor origination, portfolio and market trends to identify and mitigate emerging risks;
■Continually refine analytical and technological capabilities, processes and systems to effectively identify, assess and manage risks; and
■Develop and leverage tools and capabilities to analyze the risk/return trade-offs of corporate strategy and business decisions in order to inform and optimize capital allocation.allocation in support of our corporate strategy.
Our risk appetite is driven by our business strategy, which is established by executive management and overseen by Radian Group’s board
Risk Categories
Our risk appetite, or the amount of risk we are willing to take on in pursuit of value, is driven by our business strategy, which is established by executive management and overseen by our board of directors. We define our risk appetite qualitatively through the following key risk categories where strategic execution can take place. Our key risk categories are credit, financial, strategic, operational,occurs: credit; financial; strategic; operational; and regulatory and compliance. Rather thanWe do not treat reputational risk as a distinct category of risk, rather, we view reputational risk as pervasive throughout our entire risk portfolio, as each risk on its own can impact our reputation if not mitigated or managed properly.
Risk Governance
Board of Directors. Radian Group’sDirectors
Our board of directors is responsible for the general oversight of risks. Our board of directors seeks to understand and oversee the most critical risks relating to our business, allocates responsibilities for the oversight of risks among the full board and its committees, and reviews the systems and processes that management has in place to manage the current risks, facing Radian, as well as those that could arise in the future.
The board regularly meets with management to receive reports derived from: (i) our ERM function regarding the most significant risks we are facing, and the steps being taken to assess, manage and mitigate those risks and (ii) the Company’s information security function regarding cybersecurity risks and the Company’s efforts to mitigate such risks. The full board further considers current and potential future strategic risks facing the Company as part of its annual strategic planning session with management.
Integrated ERM Framework.Framework
We have adopted an integrated approach to risk management, which includes, among other things: (i) a centralized ERM function that resides within the office of our Chief Financial Officer and is responsible for overseeing the process for risk identification, assessment, management and mitigation across the organization and (ii) an internal audit function that performs periodic, independent reviews and tests compliance with risk management policies, procedures and standards across the Company.
Our ERM framework is designed to provide executive management with the ability to identify and evaluate the most significant risks we face and to calibrate risk mitigation strategies to account for challenges in the current business environment, as well as external factors that may negatively impact our operations. The risks that fall under the program span the entire spectrum of organizational risks and include risks that may not be easily quantifiable or measurable. These include critical risks that fall into our credit, financial, operational, regulatory and compliance, and strategic risk categories. Enterprise level risk reviews are conducted for both our Mortgage Insurance and Services businesses.
Our ERM process is illustrated in the following chart:
Our ERM program takes a holistic approach to managing risks that we face in our businesses. A cross-functional team, guided by subject matter experts and experienced managers, follows a systematic method to identify, evaluate and monitor both known and emerging risks. Risk assessments and mitigation plans are developed to address these risks. These assessments and plans are subject to review and modification to account for changes in markets and the regulatory environment, as well as other internal or external factors. Risk scoring and validation of the effectiveness of risk management plans through management reporting facilitate program sustainability and promote accountability for risk management activities throughout the Company.
Mortgage Insurance Risk Management
As part of our ERM program, our mortgage insurance business employs a comprehensive risk management function, which, in conjunction with the oversight of the Credit Management Committee of our board of directors, is responsible for establishing our credit and counterparty risk policies, monitoring compliance with our policies, managing our insured portfolio and communicating credit related issues to management, Radian Group’sour board of directors and to our customers.
Risk Origination and Servicing. We believe that understanding our business partners and customers is a key component of managing risk. Accordingly, we assign individual risk managers to specific customers so that they can more effectively perform ongoing monitoring of loan performance, underwriting quality and the risk profile and mix of business of a customer’s mortgage insurance applications. This also allows us to address specific needs of individual customers. The risk managers leverage a suite of customer-level reports to monitor trends at the customer level, identify customers who may exceed certain risk tolerances, and share meaningful data with our customers. The risk managers are also responsible for lender corrective action in the event we discover credit performance issues, such as high early payment default levels.
Portfolio Management. We have developed risk and capital allocation models thatto support our mortgage insurance business. These models provide robust analysis tocomprehensive analytics that help us establish portfolio limits for product type, loan attributes, geographic concentrations and counterparties. We proactively monitor market concentrations across these and other attributes. We also identify, evaluate and negotiate potential transactions for terminating insurance risk and for distributing risk to others,third parties, including through reinsurance arrangements. See “—Risk Distribution” below for more information about the use of reinsurance as a risk management tool in our mortgage insurance business.
As part of our portfolio management function, we monitor and analyze the performance of various risks in our mortgage insurance portfolio. We use this information to develop our mortgage credit risk and counterparty risk policies, and as a component of our default and prepayment analytics.
Credit Policy. We have developed and maintain mortgage-related credit risk policies. These policies that reflect our tolerance levels regarding counterparty, portfolio and operational risks involving mortgage collateral. OurBased on our policies and risk tolerances, our credit policy function develops and updates our mortgage insurance eligibility requirements and guidelines through regular monitoring of competitor offerings, customer input regarding lending needs, analysis of historical performance and portfolio trends, quality assurance results, and underwriter experience and observations and risk tolerances.observations. The credit policy function works closely with our mortgage insurance underwriters to ensure that underwriting decisions align with risk tolerances and principles.
Quality Assurance. Our Quality assurance is a key element ofAssurance function supports our credit analytics function and as part of our quality control program, we auditby auditing individual loan files to examine underwriting decisions for compliance with agreed-upon underwriting guidelines. These audits are conducted across loans submitted through our delegated and non-delegated underwriting channels. Our quality assurance team also audits both our customers and our underwriters to monitor quality in our NIW.
Loss Mitigation. We have a dedicated loss mitigation group that works with servicers to identify and pursue loss mitigation opportunities for loans in both our performing and non-performing (defaulted) portfolios. This includes regular surveillance and benchmarking of servicer performance with respect to default reporting, borrower retention efforts, foreclosure alternatives and foreclosure processing. Through this process, we seek to hold servicers accountable for their performance and communicate to servicers identified best practices for servicer performance. See "Mortgage—Defaults and Claims—Claims Management" above for more information.
Risk Modeling.We have expertise in the development Our risk modeling team uses analytical techniques to develop and deployment ofmaintain integrated credit and interest rate risk models. Using analytical techniques, we have developedmodels and loan level default and prepayment models for a wide range of risk management applications, including portfolio analysis, credit decision making, forecasting, and loss reserving.
Risk Distribution. In our mortgage insurance business, we use reinsurance as a capital and risk management tool to lower the risk profile and financial volatility of our mortgage insurance portfolio through economic cycles. We have distributed risk through third-party quota share and excess-of-loss reinsurance arrangements, as well as inincluding through the capital markets using mortgage insurance-linked notes transactions. During 2019,In recent years, we have expanded our risk distribution strategy in an effort to optimize the amounts and types of capital and risk distribution deployed against insured risk. The objectives of our risk distribution strategy include: (i) supporting our overall capital plan, including by reducing our cost of capital, increasing capital efficiency and enhancing our projected returns on capital and (ii) reducing portfolio risk and financial volatility through economic cycles. For additional information regarding our reinsurance programs, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cybersecurity Risk Management
Information security is a significant operational risk for financial institutions such as Radian and includes the risk of loss resulting from cyber-attacks. In an effort to mitigate this risk, Radian has builtwe have an Information Security Program that is
dedicated to protecting our corporate data as well as data entrusted to us by our customers and partners. At the core of our program is a defense-in-depth strategy, which utilizes multiple layers of security controls to protect data and solutions. Radian utilizesWe use the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework (the “NIST CSF”), as a guideline to manage our cybersecurity-related risk. The NIST CSF outlines 98 information security measures and controls over five functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond and Recover. We have developed key security services, including but not limited to, Enterprise Data Protection, Vulnerability Management and Application Security, Managed Threat Detection and Incident Response. We test our incident response readiness and reporting through table toptabletop exercises, external and internal penetration testing and other meanscontinuous internal security testing in our efforts to ensure that risks and incidents are identified, escalated and communicated for appropriate remediation activities to appropriate personnel.reduce risk to an acceptable level.
Our commitment to growing and maintaining our Information Security Program extends across the organization. Our core Information Security Team is comprised of industry-certified practitioners who are committed to adopting security technologies and practices that meet regulatory standards.all business lines. We have an Information Security and Resilience Committee comprised of Company executives, cross-functional Incident Response teams, and strong governance mechanisms designed to ensure compliance with our security policies and protocols. Additionally, the Radian Group board of directors is engaged in the Information Security Program’s oversight and receives regular updates and reporting from the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer on information security strategies, defense initiatives, event preparedness and continuous improvement efforts. While we have an Information Security Program in place in order to attempt to prevent, detect and respond to unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information, including non-public personal information, there can be no assurance that such use or disclosure will not occur. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—We could incur significant liability or reputational harm if the security of our information technology systems is breached, including as result of a cyberattack, or we otherwise fail to protect confidential information, including non-public personal information that we maintain.”
Human Capital Management
For nearly 45 years at Radian, our products and services have responsibly helped millions of families achieve their dream of homeownership. This company-wide commitment to help more Americans achieve their dream of homeownership, while supporting our customers and the communities where we live and work, aligns with our core organizational values and defines who we are as an enterprise: Deliver the Brand Promise, Innovate for the Future, Create Shareholder Value, Our People are the Difference, Do What’s Right, and Partner to Win.
We value our employees by supporting a healthy work-life balance and a team-oriented, One Radian environment. We strive to offer competitive compensation and benefits programs as well as development opportunities, while fostering a community where everyone feels included and empowered to do their best work and is encouraged to give back to their communities to make a social impact. As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately 1,600 employees of Radian Group and its subsidiaries.
COVID-19 Response
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have taken a number of actions to focus on protecting and supporting our workforce. Our business continuity plans were in place and we were able to seamlessly transition to a work-from-home virtual
workforce model with certain essential activities supported by limited staff in office environments that comply with CDC guidelines and applicable state and local requirements. We actively monitor our practices for our limited on-site essential workers to ensure safety protocols are in place. We enhanced our employee communication strategy to ensure frequent communication with employees in the remote workplace, including Chief Executive Officer roundtable listening sessions, weekly organization-wide communications, and survey tools to allow our workforce to provide feedback. We continue to reinforce our employee health and wellness benefits and mental health program resources by implementing benefit program changes to accommodate COVID-19-related leaves and hardships, amending our savings and retirement plans to comply with emerging legislation that allows for greater flexibility in response to the pandemic, and providing access to third-party caregiver and household support services. As we adapt to and embrace a greater virtual footprint, we have embarked on planning our future work design to allow our employees increased flexibility and work-life balance via remote work opportunities, while reconfiguring our onsite environments to ensure the safety and protection of our essential workers.
Compensation and Benefits Program
Our compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and reward talented individuals who possess the skills necessary to support our business objectives, assist in the achievement of our strategic goals and create long-term value for our stockholders. Our compensation programs include base salary, annual incentive bonuses and for certain employees, other performance-related cash-incentives such as commissions and long-term equity incentive awards. Our annual short-term incentive or bonus program is designed and approved by the Compensation and Human Capital Management Committee of our board of directors to incent achievement of our financial objectives and execution of our strategic plan in alignment with our organizational values. In addition to our cash and equity compensation programs, we offer employees a comprehensive benefits package, including, among others, life and health (medical, dental and vision) insurance, paid time off, paid parental leave and caregiver leave, a 401(k) plan with an employer matching contribution, and tuition reimbursement.
Inclusion and Diversity
At Radian, we are committed to an inclusive and diverse workplace. Our theme is We Are Many, We Are One Radian, and we believe that an equitable and inclusive environment with diverse teams produces more creative solutions, results in better, more innovative products and services and is crucial to our efforts to attract and retain key talent. In 2019, we established an Inclusion & Diversity Council that is sponsored by our Chief Executive Officer, led by senior management and consists of leaders from across the Company to advance the program and its efforts. In 2020, we created a framework for and launched Radian’s Employee Resource Group program through an open application process. In 2020, we trained all managers on unconscious bias and we are committed to providing equal employment opportunities and promoting inclusive hiring practices, developing targeted recruitment strategies and improving internal reporting capabilities.
In terms of gender equality, Radian has been making strides in advancing women in the workplace and in January 2021 was recognized by the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index for the third consecutive year. At December 31, 2020, women represented 58% of our workforce, 38% of the direct reports to our Chief Executive Officer and 41% of our senior management team comprising officers at the Assistant Vice President level and above. In addition, with three women directors representing 30% of Radian Group’s total board of directors, Radian was awarded a ‘W’ by 2020 Women on Boards for being a ‘winning company.’
Talent Development and Employee Engagement
We invest in our people to provide opportunities for career growth. Talent development, annual performance reviews focused in part on living our values, and succession planning are all important aspects of this investment. These processes help management identify and nurture top talent for leadership opportunities and support the growth and development of knowledge and skills of Radian employees, managers and leaders.
In order to measure engagement and culture across the organization, we use employee experience surveys. Our most recent employee experience survey was conducted in 2019 with a 75% employee participation rate (versus a benchmark of 65%) and responses revealed an Engaged-to-Disengaged Ratio of 16.5 to 1 (versus a benchmark of 2.6 to 1). In addition to our experience surveys, we frequently use employee pulse surveys to gather employee feedback. Most recently, in October 2020 we conducted a pulse survey to gather feedback on supporting our employees in the remote work environment and the Company’s COVID-19 response. We believe our efforts to foster our One Radian culture and engagement are reflected in our employee voluntary attrition rates, which have been below the national average consistently over the past five years.
Community Involvement
Radian’s financial strength and growth depend on the well-being of our employees, and therefore, the communities in which they live and we operate. Therefore, the Company strives to enhance the health, welfare, financial strength and quality of life of our employees and the communities where we live and work through thoughtful social investments, as well as a matching gifts program and volunteer opportunities. In 2020, we implemented a number of initiatives to help alleviate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including doubling our matching gift program for employees and passing some of the savings from reduced
travel and entertainment expenses on to organizations supporting essential workers. Radian’s community-based program, Radian Connected, offers community involvement including volunteerism, developmental opportunities for learning and skill development, and social opportunities to network and build stronger working relationships. We believe that this commitment to our communities helps in our efforts to attract and retain employees.
Regulation
We are subject to comprehensive regulation by both federal and state regulatory authorities. Set forth below is a description of significant state and federal regulations and other requirements of the GSEs that are applicable to our businesses. The descriptions below are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the laws and regulations discussed. In Item 1A. Risk Factors, see “—Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to comprehensive state insurance regulations and other requirements, which we may fail to satisfy”and “—Legislation and administrative and regulatory changes and interpretations could impact our businesses.businesses.”
State Regulation
Overview of State Insurance Regulation and Our Insurance Subsidiaries
We and our insurance subsidiaries are subject to comprehensive regulation by the insurance departments in the various states where they are licensed to transact business. Insurance laws vary from state to state, but generally grant broad supervisory powers to agencies or officials to examine insurance companies and enforce rules or exercise discretion affecting almost every significant aspect of the insurance business. These regulations principally are designed for the protection of policyholders, rather than for the benefit of investors.
Insurance regulations address, among other things, the licensing of companies to transact business, claims handling, reinsurance requirements, premium rates and policy forms offered to customers, financial statements, periodic reporting, permissible investments and adherence to financial standards relating to surplus, dividends and other measures of solvency intended to assure the satisfaction of obligations to policyholders.
Our insurance subsidiaries’ premium rates and policy forms are generally subject to regulation in every state in which they are licensed to transact business. These regulations are intended to protect policyholders against excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory rates and to encourage competition in the insurance marketplace. In most states where our insurance subsidiaries are licensed, premium rates and policy forms must be filed with the state insurance regulatory authority and, in some states, must also be approved before their use. With respect to mortgage insurance, premium rates may be subject to actuarial justification, generally on the basis of the mortgage insurer’s loss experience, expenses and future projections. In addition, states may assess how rates are being charged to various customers based on whether they are “similarly situated” and also may evaluate general default experience in the mortgage insurance industry in assessing the premium rates charged by mortgage insurers. In many states, the filed forms allow for a deviation from the filed rates within a certain range to take into consideration various factors linked to the credit being insured.
As to title insurance, premium rates and policy forms must be filed with state insurance regulatory authorities and, in some states, must also be approved before their use. Policy forms require approval to ensure that the coverage and exceptions conform to state insurance regulations. Premium rates subject to approval often must be supported by actuarial data or a study of financial impact of the premium rate on the Company.
Each insurance subsidiary is required by the insurance regulatory authority of its state of domicile, and the insurance regulatory authority of each other jurisdiction in which it is licensed to transact business, to make various filings with those insurance regulatory authorities and with the NAIC, including quarterly and annual financial statements prepared in accordance with SAP. In addition, our insurance subsidiaries are subject to examination by the insurance regulatory authority of their state of domicile, as well as each of the states in which they are licensed to transact business.
Radian Group is an insurance holding company and our mortgage insurance subsidiaries and title insurance company belong to an insurance holding company system. All states regulate insurance holding company systems, including by taking into consideration the non-insurer holding companies within that system. These laws generally require each insurance subsidiary within an insurance holding company system to register with the insurance regulatory authority of its domiciliary state, and to furnish to the regulators in these states applicable financial statements, statements related to intercompany transactions and other information concerning the holding company and its affiliated companies within the holding company system that may materially affect the operations, management or financial condition of insurers or the holding company.
We are subject to the insurance holding company laws of Pennsylvania and Ohio because all of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in Pennsylvania and Radian Title Insurance is domiciled in Ohio. These insurance holding company laws regulate, among other things, certain transactions between Radian Group, our insurance subsidiaries and affiliates. The holding company laws of Pennsylvania and Ohio also govern certain transactions involving Radian Group’s common stock, including transactions that constitute a “change of control” of Radian Group and, consequently, a “change of control” of its insurance subsidiaries. Specifically, no person may, directly or indirectly, seek to acquire “control” of Radian Group or any of its insurance subsidiaries unless that person received prior approval after filing a statement and other documents with the Pennsylvania Insurance Department and, in the case of a change of control involving Radian Group or Radian Title Insurance, the Ohio Department of Insurance. Under Pennsylvania’s and Ohio’s insurance statutes, “control” is defined broadly and is “presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds with power to vote or holds proxies representing 10% or more of the voting securities” of a holding company of a Pennsylvania or Ohio domiciled insurer. The statute further defines “control”
“control” as the “possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of” an insurer.
In addition, material transactions between us or our affiliates and our insurance subsidiaries or among our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain conditions, including that they be “fair and reasonable.” These conditions generally apply to all persons controlling, or who are under common control with, us or our insurance subsidiaries. Certain transactions between us or our affiliates and our insurance subsidiaries may not be entered into unless the Pennsylvania Insurance Department or Ohio Department of Insurance, as applicable, is given 30 days’ prior notice and does not disapprove the transaction during that 30-day period.
Pennsylvania and Ohio regulations require that we identify the material risks within the insurance holding company system that could pose enterprise risk to the insurer. Among other things, Pennsylvania and Ohio require that insurers domiciled in their states maintain a risk management framework and conduct an Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (“ORSA”) annually in accordance with applicable NAIC requirements. Ohio regulations, and beginning in 2020 also Pennsylvania regulations, require that insurers domiciled within their states provide an annual summary of the corporate governance structure, risk oversight and certain other policies and practices of the insurer or insurance group, known as the Corporate Governance Disclosure, or “CGAD.”
All of ourOur two principal mortgage insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in Pennsylvania. Listed below are our principal insurance companies as of December 31, 2019:
| |
• | Radian Guaranty. Radian Guaranty is our primary mortgage insurance company, and is a direct subsidiary of Radian Group. Radian Guaranty is our only mortgage insurance company that is currently eligible to provide first-loss mortgage insurance on GSE loans. It is a monoline insurer, restricted by the laws of certain states to writing first-lien residential mortgage guaranty insurance. Radian Guaranty is authorized to write mortgage guaranty insurance (or in states where there is no specific authorization for mortgage guaranty insurance, the applicable line of insurance under which mortgage guaranty insurance is regulated) in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Guam.
|
| |
• | Radian Reinsurance. Radian Reinsurance is a direct subsidiary of Radian Group and is a licensed credit insurer. Prior to January 31, 2020, Radian Reinsurance primarily provided reinsurance to Radian Guaranty for loans where the mortgage insurance covered in excess of 25% of the total mortgage. We also use Radian Reinsurance to participate in the credit risk transfer programs developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and therefore, Radian Reinsurance provides mortgage credit risk insurance on GSE loans through these programs. See “Mortgage
|
Insurance—Radian Guaranty. Radian Guaranty is our primary mortgage insurance company, and is a direct subsidiary of Radian Group. Radian Guaranty is our only mortgage insurance company that is currently eligible to provide first-loss mortgage insurance on GSE loans. It is a monoline insurer, restricted by the laws of certain states to writing first-lien residential mortgage guaranty insurance. Radian Guaranty is authorized to write mortgage guaranty insurance (or in states where there is no specific authorization for mortgage guaranty insurance, the applicable line of insurance under which mortgage guaranty insurance is regulated) in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Guam.
Radian Reinsurance. Radian Reinsurance is a direct subsidiary of Radian Group and is a licensed credit insurer in Pennsylvania. Radian Reinsurance participates in the credit risk transfer programs developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and therefore, Radian Reinsurance provides mortgage credit risk insurance on GSE loans through these programs. See “Mortgage—Mortgage Business Overview—Mortgage Insurance Business Overview—Mortgage Insurance Products—Products—Other Mortgage Insurance Products—GSE Credit Risk Transfer” for more information about these programs.programs.
| |
• | Radian Insurance. Radian Insurance is a direct subsidiary of Radian Group and insures a small remaining amount of second-lien mortgage loan risk.
|
In addition, weRadian Insurance is a direct subsidiary of Radian Group and insures a small remaining amount of second-lien mortgage loan risk. We also have the following mortgage insurance subsidiaries, each of which had no RIF as of December 31, 2019:2020: Radian Investor Surety Inc., Radian Mortgage Guaranty Inc., Radian Guaranty Reinsurance Inc. and Radian Mortgage Assurance.
As part of our title services we offer title insurance through Radian Title Insurance, which we acquired on March 27, 2018. Radian Title Insurance is an Ohio domiciled title insurance underwriter and settlement services company that is licensed to issue title insurance policies in 39 states and the District of Columbia. Radian Title Insurance is a wholly owned subsidiary of Radian Title Services Inc., which we acquired on March 27, 2018.
Mortgage Insurance Capital Requirements and Dividends
Under state insurance regulations, Radian Guaranty is required to maintain minimum surplus levels and, in certain states, a minimummaximum ratio of statutory capitalnet RIF relative to the level of net RIF,statutory capital, or Risk-to-capital. Sixteen states currently impose a Statutory RBC Requirement. The most common Statutory RBC Requirement is that a mortgage insurer’s Risk-to-capital may not exceed 25 to 1. In certain of the RBC States, Radian Guaranty must satisfy a MPP Requirement. Unless an RBC State grants a waiver or other form of relief, if a mortgage insurer, such as Radian Guaranty, is not in compliance with the Statutory RBC Requirement of that state, it may be prohibited from writing new mortgage insurance business in that state. Radian Guaranty’s domiciliary state, Pennsylvania, is not one of the RBC States. The statutory capital requirements for the non-RBC States are de minimis (ranging from $1 million to $5 million); however, the insurance laws of these states generally grant broad supervisory powers to state agencies or officials to enforce rules or exercise discretion affecting almost every significant aspect of the insurance business, including the power to revoke or restrict an insurance company’s ability to write new business. Unless an RBC State grants a waiver or other form of relief, if a mortgage insurer, such as Radian Guaranty, is not in compliance with the Statutory RBC Requirement of that state, it may be prohibited from writing new mortgage insurance business in that state. Radian Guaranty’s domiciliary state, Pennsylvania, is not one of the RBC States. In 20192020 and 2018,2019, the RBC States accounted for approximately 53.2%52.8% and 55.0%53.2%, respectively, of Radian Guaranty’s total primary NIW. As of December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Guaranty’s Risk-to-capital was 13.612.7 to 1, and Radian Guaranty was in compliance with all applicable Statutory RBC Requirements.
The NAIC is in the process of reviewing the minimum capital and surplus requirements for mortgage insurers and considering changes to the Model Act. In December 2019, a working group of state regulators released exposure drafts of a revised Model Act, including new proposed mortgage guaranty insurance capital requirements for mortgage insurers. TheWhile the process for developing this framework was inactive as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we understand the initiative remains active and that an effort to resume work on the exposure draft is ongoing, and the outcome of this process remains uncertain.expected in 2021. As proposed, the capital requirements set forth in the currentmost recent exposure draft are impacted, among other things, by changes in the economic and housing environment, including changes in home prices and incomes. GivenThe ultimate outcome of this process remains uncertain, including the current economic and housing environment, if the exposure draftform of the new Model Act was adopted and in effect today, we do not believe that the capital requirements imposed by the new Model Act would exceed those of the current PMIERs financial requirements.and how they may be implemented and enforced. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to comprehensive state insurance regulations and other requirements, which we may fail to satisfy.”
Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, dividends and other ordinary distributions may only be paid out of an insurer’s positive unassigned surplus, measured as of the end of the prior fiscal year, unless the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approves the payment of dividends or other distributions from another source. While all proposed dividends and distributions to stockholders must be filed with the Pennsylvania Insurance Department prior to payment, if a Pennsylvania domiciled insurer had positive unassigned surplus as of the end of the prior fiscal year, then unless the prior approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department is obtained, such insurer could only pay dividends or other distributions during any 12-month period in an
aggregate amount less than or equal to the greater of: (i) 10% of the preceding year-end statutory policyholders’ surplus or (ii) the preceding year’s statutory net income.
At December 31, 2019,2020, although Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance had statutory policyholders’ surplus of $637.7$481.5 million, and $455.6 million, respectively, both companiesit had a negative unassigned surplus balancesbalance of $503.3$859.5 million, and $50.4 million, respectively, primarily due to the need for mortgage guaranty insurers to establish and maintain contingency reserves, as further discussed below. Therefore, no dividends or other ordinary distributions can be paid by these subsidiariesthis subsidiary in 2020. 2021 without approval from the Pennsylvania Insurance Department.
At December 31, 2020, Radian Reinsurance had statutory policyholders’ surplus of $360.7 million and positive unassigned surplus of $319.7 million. As a result, without prior approval from the Pennsylvania Insurance Department, Radian Reinsurance has the ability to pay an ordinary dividend in an amount up to $36.1 million in 2021.
In light of Radian Guaranty’s negative unassigned surplus related to operating losses in prior periods and the ongoing need to set aside contingency reserves, we do not anticipate that Radian Guaranty will be permitted under applicable insurance laws to pay ordinary dividends to Radian Group for the foreseeable future. Based on the typical 10-year holding requirement discussed below, Radian Guaranty is scheduled to release contingency reserves to unassigned surplus in material amounts beginning in 2024, which should accelerate the reduction of its negative unassigned surplus. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, an insurer may request
approval to pay an Extraordinary Distribution, subject to the approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. In April 2019, Radian Guaranty sought and received such approval to return capital by paying a $375 million Extraordinary Distribution to Radian Group on April 30, 2019. Further, in January 2020, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approved a $465 million Extraordinary Distribution from Radian Reinsurance to Radian Group, which was paid on January 31, 2020. See Note 1816 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on contingency reserve requirements, as well as additional information about distributions of capital paid from our insurance subsidiaries in 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017.
All of our other mortgage insurance subsidiaries also had negative unassigned surplus at December 31, 2019. Therefore, no dividends or other ordinary distributions can be paid by these subsidiaries in 2020 without approval from the Pennsylvania Insurance Department.2018.
For statutory reporting, mortgage insurance companies are required annually to set aside contingency reserves in an amount equal to 50% of earned premiums. SuchThe contingency reserve, which is designed to be a reserve against catastrophic losses, essentially restricts dividends and other ordinary distributions by mortgage insurance companies as such amounts cannot be released into surplus for a period of 10 years, except when loss ratios exceed 35%, in which case the amount above 35% can be released under certain circumstances. TheDue to elevated losses in 2020 associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, Radian Guaranty received regulatory approval to release $93.0 million from contingency reserve, which is designed to be a reserve against catastrophic losses, essentially restricts dividends and other ordinary distributions by mortgage insurance companies.reserves, as reflected in its statutory financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. Radian Guaranty did not release any amounts from its contingency reserves in 2019 or 2018. We classify the contingency reserves of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries as a statutory liability. At December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance had contingency reserves of $2.6$3.4 billion and $360.3$20.5 million, respectively.
Title Insurance Capital Requirements and Dividends
Radian Title Insurance is required to maintain Statutory Premium Reserves (“SPR”), calculated as a percentage of gross premiums collected. The SPR requirements are set by each state, with the most common being 7%. The SPR is then recovered based on a release schedule, amortized over 20 years. In addition to the SPR, Radian Title Insurance is subject to periodic reviews of certain financial performance ratios, and the states in which it is licensed can impose capital requirements on Radian Title Insurance based on the results of those ratios.
Under Ohio’s insurance laws, dividends and other ordinary distributions may only be paid out of an insurer’s positive unassigned surplus, measured as of the end of the prior fiscal year, unless the Ohio Department of Insurance approves the payment of dividends or other ordinary distributions from another source. While all proposed dividends and distributions to stockholders must be filed with the Ohio Department of Insurance prior to payment, if an Ohio domiciled insurer had positive unassigned surplus as of the end of the prior fiscal year, then unless the prior approval of the Ohio Department of Insurance is obtained, such insurer could only pay dividends or other distributions during any 12-month period in an aggregate amount less than or equal to the greater of: (i) 10% of the preceding year-end statutory policyholders’ surplus or (ii) the preceding year’s statutory net income. Radian Title Insurance had negative unassigned surplus at December 31, 20192020 of $23.0$21.5 million, therefore it is unable to pay dividends or other ordinary distributions in 20202021 without approval from the Ohio Department of Insurance.
In September of 2017, the New York State Department of Financial Services (“DFS”) issued 11 NYCRR 228 (“Regulation 208”) which regulates title insurance marketing practices, expenses and transaction related charges in the state of New York. Regulation 208 limits or bans title underwriters and agents from charging consumers certain title and closing related fees, and Regulation 208 contains strict rules around marketing expenses aimed at restricting or stopping certain marketing practices in the title industry. Radian Settlement Services and Radian Title Insurance have adjusted their transaction fees and marketing practices and expenses to comply with Regulation 208.
Real EstateOther Services
Certain of our Services subsidiaries are subject to regulation and oversight by the states where they conduct their businesses, including requirements to be licensed and/or registered in the states in which they conduct operations.
Our real estate brokerage businesses provide services in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and they and their designated brokers are required to hold licenses and conduct their brokerage business in conformity with the applicable license laws and administrative regulations of the states in which they are conducting their business. As a licensed real estate
brokerage, Red Bell receives residential real estate information from various multiple listing services (“MLS”), which it uses to broker real estate transactions and provide valuation products and services, pursuant to the terms of agreements with the MLS providers. These MLS agreements include restrictions on the permitted use of the MLS information obtained through these agreements and impose requirements on the business of real estate brokerages in order to maintain eligibility to continue to receive the MLS information. If these agreements were to terminate or Red Bell otherwise were to lose access to this information, it could negatively impact Red Bell’s ability to conduct its business.
Radian Settlement Services and its subsidiarysubsidiaries provide title and escrow services and these entities are required to hold licenses in the jurisdictions where they operate their business. Title insurance agency and escrow licensing is primarily regulated by states in which the
services are being offered, with licensing and registration typically within the jurisdiction of each state’s department of insurance. Radian Settlement Services is domiciled and licensed in Pennsylvania as a resident title insurance agency and, together with its subsidiary,subsidiaries, is licensed in 3241 additional states.
In 2018, Radian acquiredValuation Services LLC (formerly known as Independent Settlement Services, a national appraisal and title management services company. Independent Settlement ServicesLLC) is licensed to providean appraisal management servicescompany, licensed in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.Columbia, that supports valuation services provided by affiliated entities. Real estate appraisal management statutes and regulations vary from state to state, but generally grant broad supervisory powers to agencies or officials to examine companies and enforce rules. While these businesses are generally state regulated, the Dodd-Frank Act established minimum requirements to be implemented by states regarding the registration and supervision of appraisal management companies. Most states have based their legislation on model legislation developed by the Appraisal Institute for the registration and oversight of appraisal management companies.
Radian Lender Services LLC provides third partythird-party underwriting and loan processing services to lenders, including services that may be deemed loan origination activities as defined by the SAFE Act (discussed below) and state law equivalents. This entity and its employees that provide our contract underwriting and loan processing services are complianteligible to provide these services in compliance with the SAFE Act for underwriting in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and compliant forin compliance with loan processing requirements in 44 states and the District of Columbia. See “—Federal Regulation—The SAFE Act.Act.”
Cybersecurity
The DFS issued cybersecurity regulations that became effective March 1, 2017 and apply to all financial institutions and insurance companies licensed under the New York Banking, Insurance, and Financial Services Laws, including Radian Guaranty and certain of our other subsidiaries. The regulations require covered entities to, among other things: establish a cybersecurity program; adopt a written cybersecurity policy; designate a Chief Information Security Officer responsible for implementing, overseeing and enforcing the cybersecurity program and policy; and have policies and procedures designed to ensure the security of information systems and nonpublic information accessible to, or held by, third-parties, along with a variety of other requirements to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information systems.
Privacy
In June of 2018, the State of California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) which applies to any company that does business in California and meets certain threshold requirements. The CCPA became effective January 1, 2020. The California Attorney General has issued proposed implementing regulations which must be finalized on or before July 1, 2020, which is also the first day that the California Attorney General can enforce the CCPA. We believe Radian Group and certain of its affiliates may be deemed covered businesses under the CCPA. The CCPA creates a new privacy framework for covered businesses that collect, sell or disclose personal information of California consumers. The definition of protected “personal information” under the CCPA is broad, and the CCPA creates five new categories of data privacy rights for California consumers: the right to: (i) know what personal information is being collected about them, whether their personal information is sold or disclosed and to whom; (ii) access a copy of their personal information; (iii) delete their personal information from business servers and service providers, unless it is necessary to maintain the information under enumerated exceptions; (iv) opt out of the sale of their personal information to third parties; and (v) have equal access and service if they exercise their rights. Companies subject to the CCPA are required to establish procedures to enable them to comply with a California consumer’s data privacy rights, including by disclosing the privacy practices of the entity and responding to consumer requests within prescribed timeframes. The CCPA provides a private right of action for data breaches, including statutory or actual damages, and public enforcement by the California Attorney General for other violations. ToOn November 3, 2020, California voters approved a ballot initiative known as Proposition 24, which created a new privacy law known as the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”). The CPRA is designed to enhance certain of the privacy protections for California consumers that were created by the CCPA. Although most of the CRPA’s provisions will not go into effect until January 1, 2023, the CPRA is an expansive privacy law which will create additional compliance obligations for covered entities.
We have put policies and procedures in place to comply with the CCPA we have developed new policies and procedures, and have implemented operational changes.CCPA. In addition to California, other states have started to move forward with new privacy regulations and federal regulators have proposed draft federal privacy legislation, all of which, if adopted, could impact our businesses or those of our customers.
Federal Regulation
CARES Act
Since the outbreak of the pandemic, there have been a number of governmental efforts to implement programs designed to assist individuals and businesses impacted by the COVID-19 virus, including the CARES Act that was enacted on March 27, 2020. The CARES Act provided a temporary foreclosure and eviction moratorium for residential mortgagors with certain federally or GSE-backed mortgages. These moratoriums have been extended through the action of relevant regulatory agencies. The GSEs recently extended their moratoriums on single-family foreclosures and real estate owned (REO) evictions until June 30, 2021. The ongoing REO eviction moratorium has negatively impacted the REO management business in our Real Estate segment.
In addition, under the CARES Act, upon request by borrowers of federally backed mortgage loans who attest to financial hardship related to the pandemic, mortgage servicers are required to provide these borrowers with up to 180 days forbearance on their mortgage payments, which may be extended for an additional 180 days upon request, without requiring validation by the borrowers of their hardship. The CARES Act provides no end date for when the 180 days forbearance must initially be offered. The permissible forbearance period of 12 months under the CARES Act has been lengthened by various federal agencies and the length of the period varies depending on the agency and type of mortgage at issue. For example, the GSEs recently extended the allowable forbearance period from 12 months to 18 months for those borrowers who are in an active COVID-19 related forbearance program as of February 28, 2021. A significant number of borrowers are participating in such programs, which has increased the number of defaults in our mortgage insurance portfolio and negatively impacted our results of operations and financial condition, and has increased our Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs. The GSEs have announced that, at the end of the forbearance plan, the homeowner may not be required to pay back their reduced or suspended mortgage payments in one lump sum, but may be eligible for a number of different options offered by their mortgage servicer, including repayment plans, resuming normal payments or lowering the monthly loan payment through a modification. However, there can be no assurances that homeowners will be able to remain current on their mortgages once the forbearance period ends, and a significant percentage could ultimately default and result in a mortgage insurance claim. For additional information on the potential impacts of the CARES Act on the GSEs, loan servicers and our PMIERs financial requirements, in Item 1A. Risk Factors, see “—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity,” “—Changes in the charters, business practices, or role of the GSEs in the U.S. housing market generally, could significantly impact our businesses,” and “—Our business depends, in part, on effective and reliable loan servicing.”
GSE Requirements
PMIERs—Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements. As the largest purchasers of conventional mortgage loans, and therefore, the main beneficiaries of private mortgage insurance, the GSEs impose eligibility requirements that private mortgage insurers must satisfy in order to be approved to insure loans purchased by the GSEs. The PMIERs initially became effective December 31, 2015, and aim to ensure that approved insurers will possess the financial and operational capacity to serve as strong counterparties to the GSEs throughout various market conditions. The PMIERs are comprehensive, covering virtually all aspects of the business and operations of a private mortgage insurer of GSE loans, including internal risk management and quality controls, the relationship between the GSEs and the approved insurer and the approved insurer’s financial condition. The PMIERs contain extensive requirements related to the conduct and operations of our mortgage insurance business, including operational requirements in areas such as claim processing, loss mitigation, document retention,
underwriting, quality control, reporting and monitoring, among others. In addition, the PMIERs prohibit private mortgage insurers from engaging in certain activities such as insuring loans originated or serviced by an affiliate (except under certain circumstances) and require private mortgage insurers to obtain the prior consent of the GSEs before taking certain actions, which may include entering into various intercompany agreements and settlements with respect to GSE insured loans and commuting or reinsuring risk, among others. Radian Guaranty currently is an approved mortgage insurer under the PMIERs.
The PMIERs financial requirements require that a mortgage insurer’s Available Assets meet or exceed its Minimum Required Assets. The PMIERs financial requirements include increased financial requirements for defaulted loans, as well as for performing loans with a higher likelihood of default and/or certain credit characteristics, such as higher LTVs and lower FICO scores, and forcredit scores. With respect to defaulted loans, originated after January 1, 2016the PMIERs recognize that are insured under lender-paid mortgage insurance policies not subject to automatic termination under the HPA. Therefore, if our mixloans that have become non-performing as a result of business includesa FEMA Declared Major Disaster generally have a higher percentagelikelihood of curing following the conclusion of the event by applying a Disaster Related Capital Charge to reduce the Minimum Required Asset factor for these loans. In 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the GSEs issued guidelines (“National Emergency Guidelines”) that became effective June 30, 2020 and, among other things, adopted the COVID-19 Amendment to the PMIERs to apply the Disaster Related Capital Charge nationwide to certain non-performing loans that we refer to as COVID-19 Defaulted Loans, which comprise non-performing loans that either: (i) have an Initial Missed Payment (discussed below) occurring during the COVID-19 Crisis Period or (ii) are subject to these increaseda forbearance plan granted in response to a financial requirements,hardship related to COVID-19 (which is assumed under the COVID-19 Amendment to be the case for any loan that has an Initial Missed Payment occurring during the COVID-19 Crisis Period and is subject to a forbearance plan), the terms of which are materially consistent with the terms of forbearance plans offered by the GSEs.
Under the COVID-19 Amendment, the Disaster Related Capital Charge applies for three calendar months beginning with the month the loan becomes non-performing (i.e., missed two monthly payments), or if greater, the period of time that the loan is subject to a forbearance plan, repayment plan or loan modification trial period granted in response to a financial hardship related
to COVID-19. Under the COVID-19 Amendment, the Initial Missed Payment means the first missed monthly payment, which would be reported to us as delinquent as of the last day of the month for which it increaseswas due. For example, for a loan first reported to the Minimum Required Assets and/orapproved insurer in May as having missed its payments due on April 1 and May 1, the Initial Missed Payment shall be deemed to have occurred on April 30. In this example, the loan would become a non-performing primary mortgage guaranty insurance loan in May and the 0.30 multiplier would be applied for May, June, and July. The National Emergency Guidelines state that they will be updated if the GSEs determine that the COVID-19 Crisis Period needs to be extended. In December 2020, the GSEs extended the COVID-19 Crisis Period through March 31, 2021. The current broad-based application of the Disaster Related Capital Charge has reduced the total amount of AvailableMinimum Required Assets that Radian Guaranty isotherwise would have been required to hold.hold against pandemic-related defaults as of December 31, 2020 by approximately $650.0 million, taking into account our existing risk distribution structures. The expiration of the COVID-19 Crisis Period on March 31, 2021 or a later date if further extended, does not automatically terminate the National Emergency Guidelines and the applicability of the COVID-19 Amendment. As long as the National Emergency Guidelines and the COVID-19 Amendment remain in place, the Disaster Related Capital Charge would continue to apply to defaults subject to a COVID-19 related forbearance plan regardless of whether the forbearance plan was entered into before or after the expiration of the COVID-19 Crisis Period. Further, if the National Emergency Guidelines and the COVID-19 Amendment are terminated, the Disaster Related Capital Charge would then be applied in accordance with the PMIERs’ provision pertaining to loans that have become non-performing as a result of a FEMA Declared Major Disaster. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview—Operating Environment.Liquidity and Capital Resources—Mortgage.” The
In addition to the increased financial requirements for defaulted loans and certain performing loans, the PMIERs financial requirements also impose limitations on the credit that is granted for certain Available Assets. For example, the PMIERs limit the amount of credit given to surplus notes issued by a mortgage insurer to 9% of Minimum Required Assets, and therefore, based onAssets. In addition, the balance of its surplus notes currently outstanding,PMIERs prohibit Radian Guaranty would not receivefrom engaging in certain activities such as insuring loans originated or serviced by an affiliate (except under certain circumstances) and require Radian Guaranty to obtain the prior consent of the GSEs before taking many actions, which may include, among other things, entering into various intercompany agreements, settling loss mitigation disputes with customers and commuting risk. Further, pursuant to the National Emergency Guidelines, through June 30, 2021, the consent of the GSEs is required for Radian Guaranty to: (i) pay dividends or make payments of principal or increase payments of interest beyond those commitments made prior to June 30, 2020 associated with the Surplus Notes; (ii) make any further creditother payments, unless related to expenses incurred in the normal course of business or to commitments made prior to June 30, 2020; (iii) pledge or transfer asset(s) to any affiliate or investor; or (iv) enter into any new arrangements or alter any existing arrangements under the PMIERs for any additional capital it received under additional surplus notes it may issue.tax sharing and intercompany expense-sharing agreements other than renewals and extensions of agreements in effect prior to June 30, 2020.
The GSEs have significant discretion under the PMIERs and may amend the PMIERs at any time, although the GSEs have communicated that for material changes, including large-scale material changes affecting Minimum Required Assets, they will generally provide written notice 180 days prior to the effective date and engage in a discussion and comment process with the private mortgage insurers regarding the proposed changes prior to finalizing them. The most recent large-scale revisions to PMIERs, or PMIERs 2.0, became effective on March 31, 2019.2019, and the PMIERs 2.0 eliminated any credit for future premiums for insurance policies written priorwere further updated in June 2020 to and including 2008, which had been permitted underspecifically address the prior PMIERs requirements. In addition, among other changes, defaulted loans in FEMA-declared major disaster areas require a reduced level of Minimum Required Assets under PMIERs 2.0, subject to certain requirements. COVID-19 pandemic.
It is possible that the GSEs may seek to amend PMIERs 2.0 in orderthe future to align the financial requirements of the PMIERs with the capital requirementrequirements for the GSEs set forth in the CCF once it is finalized.ERCF that was finalized in December 2020. See “Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform and the GSEs’ Business Practices” below for additional information on the ERCF.
We have entered into reinsurance transactions, including quota share and excess-of-loss reinsurance arrangements, asAs part of our capital and risk management activities, including to manage Radian Guaranty’s capital position under the PMIERs financial requirements.requirements, we have distributed risk through third party quota share and excess-of-loss reinsurance arrangements, including through the capital markets using insurance-linked-notes transactions. The initial and ongoing credit that we receive under the PMIERs financial requirements for these risk distribution transactions is subject to the periodic review of the GSEs.GSEs and could be influenced by the ERCF, which as discussed below, provides the GSEs with a reduced amount of credit for their own credit risk transfer activities.
Although we expect Radian Guaranty to retain its eligibility status with the GSEs and to continue to comply with the PMIERs financial requirements, including as they may be updated, we cannot provide assurance that this will occur. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs.”
Other GSE Business PracticesGSEs, and Requirements. The GSEs, acting independently or through their conservator, the FHFA, have the abilityadditional capital required to change their business practices and requirements in ways that impactsupport Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our business. Examples of more recent changes or proposed changes in the GSEs’ business practices and requirements are:
the revised GSE Rescission Relief Principles that, among other things, further clarify the circumstances under which mortgage insurers may rescind insurance coverage, and have been incorporated into our 2020 Master Policy that will be effective for applications received on or after March 1, 2020;
the changes to the PMIERs under PMIERs 2.0 that became effective on March 31, 2019; and
changes to underwriting standards on mortgages they purchase, including for example, the GSEs’ decision to expand credit in 2017 by purchasing a larger portion of loans with debt-to-income ratios greater than 45%.
For information on additional potential changes in GSE business practices and requirements that could impact our business, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Changes in the charters, business practices, or role of the GSEs in the U.S. housing market generally, could significantly impact our mortgage insurance businessavailable liquidity.”
Federal Regulation
Housing Finance Reform and the GSEs’ Business Practices
The federal government plays a significant role in the U.S. housing finance system through, among other things, the involvement of the FHFA and GSEs, the FHA and the VA. The GSEs’ charters, which cannot be altered outside of federal legislation, generally prohibit them from buying low down payment mortgage loans without certain forms of credit enhancement, the primary form of which has been private mortgage
insurance. Therethem compete with other secondary market guarantors and other models proposing a broad implementation of the multiple issuer structure that exists with Ginnie Mae-backed loans. In conjunction with these proposals, there has been ongoing debate about the roles that the federal government and private capital should play in the housing finance system, and in recent years, there generally has been broad policy consensus that there is a need to increase the role of private capital in the system. As a significant source of first-loss private capital in the existing housing finance system, private mortgage insurance ishas been well-positioned in recent legislative proposals to continue to provide the type of coverage that has become the predominant form of first-loss credit enhancement in the system, commonly referred to as “standard coverage.” However, to the extent new legislative action alters the existing GSE charters without explicit preservation of the role of private mortgage insurance for high-LTV loans, our business could be adversely affected. Furthermore, it is possible legislative or administrative action, such as the imposition of higher guarantee fees or loan level price adjustments, changes to loan limits, or a significant tightening
The executive branch of the credit underwriting standards forgovernment (the “Administration”), typically through its Departments and regulatory agencies, offers perspectives on the GSEs, could result in better execution or price to consumers for non-GSE executions, including the “private label” secondary market or loans insured by the FHA, VA, or U.S. Departmentfuture of Agriculture (“USDA”). In such a scenario, our business could be adversely impacted.
Since FHFA was appointed as conservator of the GSEs in September 2008, there has been a wide range of legislative proposals to reform the U.S. housing finance market,in the U.S., including proposalsobjectives for GSE reform ranging from some that advocate nearly complete privatization and elimination of the role of the GSEs to others that support a system that combines a federal role with private capital. Recent proposals have focused on making the federal guaranty of mortgage backed securities explicit, with some models proposing the repurposing of the GSEs to have them compete with other secondary market guarantors and other models proposing a broad implementation of the multiple issuer structure that exists with Ginnie Mae backed loans.
future reform. In September 2019, the Trump Administration, through the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) released plans (the “Treasury Plan” and “HUD Plan” respectively, and collectively, the “Plans”) to reform the housing finance system, and with respect to the Treasury Plan, to recapitalize the GSEs and release them from conservatorship after certain conditions were met. The Plans, which include actions that may be taken administratively (without Congressional action) and legislatively through(through Congressional action,action), call for, among other items: (i) recapitalizing the GSEs in preparation for their release from conservatorship; (ii) a greater role for private capital in limiting the GSEs’ risk profile and taxpayer exposure; (iii) a greater coordination of housing policy between the FHFA and HUD, including a reduction in the market overlap between the FHA and the GSEs; (iv) a better defined role for the FHA in adhering to its core mission of serving lowlow- and moderate incomemoderate-income borrowers; and (v) increased transparency by the GSEs to support a more level playing field with private capital. Under current law, the FHFA has significant discretion with respect to the future state of the GSEs, including the ability to place the GSEs into receivership without further legislative action. Leadership atWe expect that the current FHFA and HUD have stated that they plan to useleadership, which was appointed under the Plans to guide the direction and activities of the GSEs and FHA. With the Plans serving as a roadmap, we expect HUD and FHFATrump Administration, will continue to take actions to shape the role of the FHA and GSEs in the housing finance market and to prepare the GSEs to exit conservatorship. While we believe that private capital is viewed favorably as a critical component of the current and future housing finance market, actions taken in furtherance of the Plans could impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) currently owns the preferred stock of the GSEs pursuant to the terms of a senior preferred stock purchase agreementPSPAs, and was prohibited from selling its stake intherefore, has significant influence over the GSEs until January 1, 2018.fate and direction of the GSEs. Prior to a December 2017 amendment to the senior preferred stock purchase agreement thatPSPAs, which allowed each GSE to retain a $3 billion capital reserve, the GSEs were required under the senior preferred stock purchase agreementPSPAs to sweep all profits to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. In September 2019, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the FHFA further amended the senior preferred stock purchase agreementPSPAs to suspend the quarterly “net worth sweep” and allow the GSEs to build a capital reserve of up to $45 billion collectively. This suspensioncollectively, and in January 2021 prior to the recent change in Administration, the PSPAs were amended again to allow the GSEs to continue to retain capital up to the amounts prescribed in newly revised capital requirements for the GSEs, under the ERCF and discussed below. As part of the net worth sweepJanuary 2021 amendment to the PSPAs, the Trump appointed leadership in Treasury and FHFA agreed, among other things: (i) that the GSEs will be not be permitted to exit conservatorship until all material litigation relating to the conservatorship is consistentresolved or settled, and the GSEs have common equity Tier 1 capital of at least 3% of its assets; (ii) on certain conditions imposed on the GSEs’ ability to raise new capital; and (iii) that the GSEs must comply with the FHFA’s stated goalnew ERCF. Simultaneous with the January 2021 amendment to the PSPAs, the Trump appointed leadership in Treasury also released its latest views on housing finance reform with the “Blueprint on Next Steps for GSE Reform.” As part of recapitalizingthis Blueprint, Treasury states that both Treasury and the FHFA have been working to identify and assess strategic options to terminate the GSE conservatorships and raise capital, including identifying any necessary legislation for reform of the GSEs. The Blueprint cites the following five key considerations to inform work with FHFA:
■A continuation of the GSEs’ capital build, including when appropriate, through a new capital raise, to ensure the GSEs have sufficient equity capital to facilitate their ability to operate through a severe downturn;
■Resolution of the current capital structures of the GSEs, including as set forth in the PSPAs, and the pending litigation related to the conservatorships to facilitate the GSEs’ capital restructuring and eventual exit from conservatorship;
■A determination regarding, and ultimate imposition of, a periodic commitment fee to be paid by the GSEs to Treasury once the GSEs have retained capital up to their regulatory capital requirements under the ERCF;
■Establishing appropriate pricing oversight over the GSEs; and
■An assessment of market concentration and whether consolidation of the GSEs’ operations into a single entity would more efficiently fulfill their mission and promote the interests of stakeholders, including taxpayers.
Throughout 2020, the FHFA has moved forward with initiatives to develop new capital and liquidity requirements for the GSEs, which have been viewed as critical to any future release from conservatorship. In December 2020, the FHFA finalized a new ERCF for the GSEs and also proposed new liquidity requirements. Among other things, the ERCF: (i) significantly increases the capital requirements of the GSEs; (ii) decreases the capital credit provided to the GSEs for credit risk transfer transactions, which have been a significant component of the GSEs capital and risk management strategy for the past several years; and (iii) reduces the overall capital relief extended to the GSEs for loans with private mortgage insurance. In December 2020, the FHFA also proposed new liquidity requirements for the GSEs, which impose a mix of new cash-flow based requirements and long-term liquidity and funding requirements that according to the FHFA are designed to ensure that the GSEs remain a source of strength for the mortgage market during downturns in the economy, and to incentivize the GSEs to issue an appropriate and stable mix of debt over the long term. The liquidity requirements currently remain subject to public comment and are proposed to be effective
in September 2021. Taken together, compliance with the ERCF and proposed new liquidity requirements could significantly alter the business practices and operations of the GSEs. In particular, if the FHFA under its current leadership continues, as anticipated, to prioritize release of the GSEs from conservatorship, the GSEs could seek to increase pricing in order to support a level of returns that are attractive to future private capital investors. An increase in GSE pricing could make alternatives to the GSEs such as FHA insured loans or the private securitization market more attractive, which could reduce the GSEs’ market position and reduce the number of loans available for private mortgage insurance.
There are many considerations related to financial, underwriting, risk management, counterparty and operational areas that likely will need to be addressed by the GSEs in order to prepare them to exit conservatorship. Additional steps are likely to be taken in furtherance of this objective, including potential further amendments tocome into compliance with the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreementnew ERCF capital requirements and the possibility thatproposed liquidity requirements, many of which could have an effect on the GSEs may seek to raise new capital through one or more private or public offerings. In addition,conventional mortgage market and potentially our business with the GSEs. For example, the current FHFA leadership has stated that while the GSEs’ capital position remains limited compared to the amount of risk they hold, the GSEs should make risk-based decisions commensurate with their limited capital positions, which could influence the type of risk the GSEs are willing to write and the FHFA’s oversight decisions regarding the GSEs. For example,There is a heightened risk that the current FHFA leadership may seek to impose limitations on the ability of the GSEs to enter into new pilot programs or may seek to allocatetake actions that result in a greater portion of the high-LTV market moving to the FHA. It is difficult to predict what actions the FHFAFHA or GSEs may take in light of the GSEs’ limited capital position and the objective to reposition them for release from conservatorship; however, these actions could reduce the amount of business done by the GSEs orthat would make execution through the FHA or the private securitization market more attractive, which could adversely affect our mortgage insurance business.
In June 2018, As part of the FHFA released a proposed capital rule to establish a CCF that would apply minimum capital requirements for the GSEs once they exit conservatorship. This rule proposed both risked-based capital requirements and revisionsJanuary 2021 amendment to the minimum leverage capital requirement forPSPAs, the GSEs. While these requirements would only take effect once the
GSEs exit conservatorship,Trump appointed leadership in the absence of greater transparency, we believe the proposed CCF provides a reasonable basis for understanding how the GSEs are currently conducting their operations, including their decisions with respect to capital allocationTreasury and pricing. In December 2019, FHFA announced that it plans to re-propose this capital rule in 2020. If and when the CCF is finalized, it is reasonably possibleagreed that the GSEs will seekmust restrict their acquisition of higher-risk single-family mortgage loans, including in particular the acquisition of investor loans and single-family mortgage loans with two or more higher risk characteristics (i.e., LTVs greater than 90%, debt-to-income ratios greater than 45% and FICO credit scores less than 680), to more closely aligntheir then current levels. The January 2021 PSPA amendment further restricted the capital requirementsquality of loans that may be purchased by the PMIERs withGSEs by limiting the CCF, which could result in further changesGSEs’ purchases to, among other enumerated types, loans that meet the QM definition.
In addition to the PMIERs.
In the absence of comprehensive housing finance reform legislation, thePSPA amendment, current FHFA has made changes to the business and operations of the GSEs. Asleadership recently released for comment a mechanism for implementing changes, the FHFA usesproposed rule regarding the process of annually releasing a strategic plan for conservatorshiphow it will consider and setting goals for the GSEs to meet (the “Scorecard”) as part of its ongoing regulation. In October 2019, the FHFA released its 2020 Scorecard for the GSEs with objectives that largely align with the recommendations set forth in the Treasury Plan discussed above.approve new GSE activities and products. Among other things, the 2020 Scorecard includes goalsproposed rule would redefine criteria for determining what constitutes a new activity that requires prior notice to support Competitive, Liquid, Efficient,the FHFA and Resilient (CLEAR) national housing finance markets,for determining whether the activity constitutes a “new product” that requires public notice and to prepare to exitcomment, describing a new product as “any new activity that FHFA determines merits public notice and comment on matters of compliance with the applicable sections of a [GSE’s] authorizing statute, safety and soundness, or public interest.” Given the size and market influence of the GSEs, from conservatorship. In addition, the 2020 Scorecard calls forthis new proposed rule is generally viewed as important to ensure that the GSEs are not otherwise encroaching on areas that may be more appropriately served by private capital.
It is difficult to transfer a meaningful portionpredict what types of credit risk, also known as “credit risk transfer,” tonew products and activities may be proposed in the private sector.future and, if applicable, whether they may be approved by the FHFA. The mandateproposed rule regarding new products, assuming it is finalized and instituted, would provide clarity regarding the process and procedures for meaningfulassessing new products and whether they may be approved. If any existing or future credit risk transfer builds upon the goals set in each of the last four years for the GSEs to transfer portions of their mortgage credit risk to the private sector by experimenting with different forms of transactions and structures. We continuestructures were to participate in the credit risk transfer programs developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. For more information about these programs, see “Mortgage Insurance—Mortgage Insurance Business Overview—Mortgage Insurance Products—Other Mortgage Insurance Products—Non-Traditional Risk.”
In addition, alternatives to traditionaldisplace primary loan level or standard levels of mortgage insurance, the amount of mortgage insurance we write may be introduced that compete with private mortgage insurance.reduced, which could negatively impact our franchise value, results of operations and financial condition. In 2018, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae announced the launch of pilot programs, Integrated Mortgage Insurance (“IMAGIN”)IMAGIN and Enterprise-Paid Mortgage Insurance (“EPMI”),EPMI, respectively, as alternative ways for lenders to obtain credit enhancement and sell to the GSEs loans with LTVs greater than 80%. to the GSEs. These investor-paid mortgage insurance programs, in which insurance is acquired directly by each GSE, have many of the same features as private mortgage insurance and represent an alternative to traditional private mortgage insurance products that are provided to individual lenders. Participants in IMAGIN and EPMI are not subject to compliance with the PMIERs, which may create a competitive disadvantage for private mortgage insurers if these pilot programs are expanded. Further, the proposed rule regarding new products states that it is intended to apply to any future pilot programs, so it is unclear whether the same standards and procedures proposed in the new rule also would apply to existing pilots such as IMAGIN and EPMI.
ItIn addition to the matters discussed above, the future of the GSEs is difficultlikely to predict what other types of credit risk transfer transactions and structures might be usedimpacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the new Biden Administration. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FHFA has had to adjust its oversight over the GSEs to ensure the GSEs are able to support borrowers impacted by the pandemic and protect the ongoing functioning of the housing finance system. In response to the pandemic, the FHFA and the GSEs have temporarily suspended all foreclosures and evictions; temporarily instituted mortgage forbearance; temporarily streamlined the appraisal, employment verification, and loan closing processes to address frictions in the mortgage origination process created by social distancing and stay-at-home orders; implemented a four-month limit on servicer advance obligations for loans in forbearance; adopted the COVID-19 Amendment to the PMIERs effective June 30, 2020; and provided that loans in COVID-19 forbearance will remain in mortgage-backed securities pools for at least the duration of the forbearance. The actions taken to address the COVID-19 pandemic and environment may not be entirely aligned with the current FHFA leadership’s long-term objective of releasing the GSEs from conservatorship. The significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on housing markets and the housing finance system is wide-ranging and unprecedented in scope. As the situation continues to evolve, the actions or potential inactions of the FHFA and GSEs in response to COVID-19 are likely to continue to have a significant impact on the future. If anyoverall functioning of the credit risk transfer transactions and structures that are being developed were to displace standard primary loan level privatehousing finance system. Because traditional mortgage insurance is an important component of this system and because our businesses depend on the amounthealth of insurance we writethe housing finance system and housing markets in particular, these actions have impacted, and may continue to impact our business operations and financial performance.
Further, the Biden Administration is likely to have significant influence over the future direction of the GSEs and the overall approach to the housing finance market and system. The Biden Administration has proposed a housing plan that is focused on:
(i) increasing access to sustainable homeownership and making housing more affordable for low- and moderate-income borrowers; (ii) ensuring the housing finance system is equitable, by identifying and eliminating discriminatory or unfair practices in the housing system; (iii) increasing the supply, lowering the cost, and improving the quality of housing, including through investments in resilience, energy efficiency, and accessibility of homes; and (iv) providing financial assistance to help Americans buy or rent safe, quality housing, including down payment assistance through a refundable and advanceable tax credit and fully funding federal rental assistance. In addition to legislative proposals to Congress, the Biden Administration may choose to institute its policies directly through Executive Orders and through its various Departments and agencies, principally Treasury, HUD, the CFPB and the VA. With respect to the FHFA, the Biden Administration’s influence may be reduced. However,limited to the extent the FHFA continues to be led by its current leadership team, which was appointed by the Trump Administration for a five-year term beginning in April of 2019. Under the legislation that formed the FHFA, the director cannot be removed by the President other than for cause; however, litigation is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of this structure. The U.S. Supreme Court previously determined that a similar structure involving the CFPB director was unconstitutional and that the CFPB director must be removable by the President other than for cause, which would suggest that it is likely that the Court may find that the current FHFA director may be removeable by the President other than for cause. The current litigation involving the FHFA is expected to be decided in the summer of 2021. If it is determined that the FHFA director is removable by the President other than for cause, the Biden Administration may move to replace the current director of the FHFA with an appointee that may be more inclined to institute the principles set forth in the Biden Administration’s housing plan, including in particular, ensuring broad access to affordable homeownership for low- and moderate-income borrowers. This could lead the FHFA later in 2021 to consider changes to the ERCF and any new liquidity rules, to reevaluate and potentially lower the GSEs also have solicited comments regardingpricing and to consider further potential expansionary approaches to the possibility of including additional mortgage insuranceGSEs’ footprint in excess of standard coverage amounts through a concept known as “deeper cover mortgage insurance,” which could increase the amount of insurance we write. As a result, it is difficult to predict the impact of any credit risk transfer products and transactions implemented by the GSEs.housing finance system.
In Item 1A. Risk Factors, see “—Changes in the charters, business practices, or role of the GSEs in the U.S. housing market generally, could significantly impact our mortgage insurance businessbusinesses” and “—Our mortgage insurance business faces intense competition.”
FHA
Private mortgage insurance competes with the single familysingle-family mortgage insurance programs of the FHA. As such, the FHA is one of the biggest competitors to ourPrivate mortgage insurance business. We competecompetes with the FHA on the basis of loan limits, pricing, credit guidelines, terms of our insurance policies and loss mitigation practices. Since 2013, the loan limits for FHA-insured loans and the loan limits for GSE conforming loans have been substantially the same. It is possible that, in the future, Congress or the Administration could impose different loan limits for FHA loans than for GSE conforming loans as it has done in the past, which could impact the competitiveness of private mortgage insurance in relation to FHA programs.
Beginning in 2008,Since the FHA, which historically had not been a significant competitor, substantially increased its market share of the insured mortgage market. Since then,financial crisis, the private mortgage insurance industry generally has been recapturingimproved its share of the insurable, low down-payment market, share from the FHA, primarily due to: (i) improvements in the financial strength of private mortgage insurers; (ii) the development of new products, pricing delivery tools and marketing efforts directed at competing with the FHA; (iii) increases in the FHA’s pricing; (iv) the U.S. government’s pursuit of legal remedies against FHA-approved lenders related to loans insured by the FHA; and (v) various policy changes at the FHA, including the general elimination of the premium cancellation provision that exists for borrower-paid private mortgage insurance. Future reductions inAs discussed above, the Biden Administration is expected to pursue actions that will further its stated objective of increasing access to affordable mortgages for low- and moderate-income borrowers. In this regard, the Biden Administration may choose to reduce the FHA’s annual or upfront premiums and/or changes to its policies mayeliminate the life-of-loan premium requirement for FHA insured loans. While a reduction in pricing would improve the competitiveness of FHA execution, we expect that a potential 0.25% reduction in FHA pricing would modestly impact our competitiveness withoverall business volume, especially in light of our ability to dynamically price loans through our RADAR Rates pricing platform. It is uncertain if and when the FHA. FHA may change its pricing and what form this price reduction could take. As last reported in November 2020, the FHA’s Mutual Mortgage Insurance (MMI) Fund had a combined capital ratio for fiscal year 2020 above the 2% ratio that the FHA is required to maintain. While this would suggest that it may be more likely that the FHA will lower pricing, the pandemic has had a significant negative impact on the FHA’s insured portfolio, including a significant increase in the total percentage of severely delinquent loans, making it more difficult to predict any future pricing actions the FHA may pursue.
In addition, in 2019, HUD issued a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) that provides guidance on the process for enforcing the False Claims Act (“FCA”), and revisions of annual and loan-level certifications which became effective January 1, 2020. The MOU provides that alleged violations of the FCA will be primarily addressed through HUD administrative proceedings and only referred to the DOJ under
certain circumstances. TheWhile we do not believe the MOU has had a significant impact on the pool of lenders doing business with the FHA, it could make the FHA more attractive to lenders who havepreviously reduced their business with the FHA because of concerns regarding the DOJ’s pursuit of legal remedies against FHA lenders.
The Treasury Plan and the HUD Plan recommended a greater coordination of housing policy between the FHFA and HUD, including a reduction in the market overlap between the FHA and the GSEs, and a better defined role for the FHA in adhering to its core mission of serving low and moderate income borrowers. Leadership at the FHFA and HUD have stated that they plan to use the Plans to guide the direction and activities of the GSEs and FHA. It is uncertain whether changes to the FHA’s business practices will be adopted and, if so, what form they may ultimately take. If changes to the FHA’s business practices are implemented, they may impact the competitiveness of private mortgage insurance.
The Dodd-Frank Act
The Dodd-Frank Act mandates significant rulemaking by several regulatory agencies to implement its provisions. The Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB to regulate the offering and provision of consumer financial products and services under federal law, including residential mortgages, and transferred authority to the CFPB to enforce many existing consumer related federal laws, including the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and RESPA.
Among the most significant provisions for private mortgage insurers under the Dodd-Frank Act are the ability to repay mortgage provisions (“Ability to Repay Rule”), including a related safe harbor set forth in the QM Rule (defined below), the securitization risk retention provisions and the expanded mortgage servicing requirements under TILA and RESPA.
Qualified Mortgage Requirements—Ability to Repay Requirements. Requirements
The Ability to Repay Rule requires mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination that, at the time the loan is consummated, the consumer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan. The Dodd-Frank Act provides that a creditor may presume that a borrower will be able to repay a loan if the loan has certain low-risk characteristics that meet the definition of a qualified mortgage (“QM Rule”). This QM presumption is generally rebuttable, however, loans that are deemed to have the lowest risk profiles are granted a safe harbor from liability (“QM Safe Harbor”) related to the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.
In adoptingimplementing the QM Rule, the CFPB established rigorous underwriting and product feature requirements for the loans to be deemed qualified mortgages. Within those regulations,mortgages (“Current QM Definition”), including that the borrower does not exceed a 43% debt-to-income ratio after giving effect to the loan. As part of the Current QM Definition, the CFPB also created a special exemption for the GSEs, thatwhich is generally referred to as the QM“QM Patch, and” that allows any loan that meets the GSE underwriting and product guidelinesfeature requirements to be deemed to be a qualified mortgage, or QM. The QM, Patch effectively provides QM designation for GSE eligible loans that have aregardless of whether the loan exceeds the 43% debt-to-income ratio in excess of 43%, which represents a meaningful portion of the loans currently purchased by the GSEs. Without the QM Patch or an alternative, loans with debt-to-income ratios above 43% would not be designated as QM unless they were insured by a federal agency such as the FHA or VA, which have each adopted their own QM definitions that currently do not have a debt-to-income ratio limitation.ratio. The QM Patch expires on July 1, 2021.
In December 2020, the earlierCFPB issued a new QM definition (“New QM Definition”) that replaces the underwriting focused approach of the end ofCurrent QM Definition, including the GSEs’ conservatorship or January 10, 2021. On July 25, 2019,43% debt-to-income ratio limitation with a new pricing-based approach to QM. Under the CFPB released an Advanced Notice of Proposed RulemakingNew QM Definition, certain underwriting considerations are retained, but QM status generally is achieved if the loan is priced at no greater than 2.25% above the Average Prime Offer Rate (“ANPR”APOR”) regarding the expiration of the QM Patch. The ANPR specifically states that the CFPB intends to allow the QM Patch to expire in January 2021 or after a short extension, if necessary, and requested comments on possible amendments to the CFPB’s QM definition, including potential replacements for the QM Patch. The CFPB has stated that it is “committed to ensuring a smooth and orderly mortgage market” in considering these issues and any resulting transition away from the QM Patch. We believe there are many viable alternatives for replacing the QM Patch, which, if adopted in a manner that brings greater consistency to how QM is defined across regulatory agencies, would limit the potential impact on the housing market and mortgage insurance market resulting from the expiration of the QM Patch. In this regard, the CFPB recently indicated that it expects to issue for comment, no later than May 2020, a proposed new QM Rule that would replace the use of a DTI ratio with an alternative measure such as a pricing measure, following a short extension of the QM Patch. The pricing measure alternative that is most commonly being discussed would allow QM designation for loans. Loans priced at or less than 1.5% above APOR are subject to the average prime offer rate (“APOR”), plus 150 basis points,QM Safe Harbor, while all other QM loans would receive the general rebuttable presumption that the loans met the ability to repay standard. The New QM Definition is intended to replace the current QM Patch, which we believe wouldif implemented, is expected to effectively reduce the number of loans that would be designated QM compared to those receiving QM designation under the QM Patch, although not materially. The outcomeNew QM Definition is effective March 1, 2021 and has a mandatory compliance deadline of July 1, 2021, at which time it is intended to replace the rulemaking process remains uncertainQM Patch. However, on February 23, 2021, the CFPB announced that it expects to issue a proposed rule to delay the July 1, 2021 mandatory compliance deadline for the New QM Definition and the expiration ofthat if this proposed rule is finalized, then: (1) the QM Patch without a viable replacement, or other potential amendmentswould remain in place until the earlier of the CFPB’sdelayed mandatory compliance date or the date that the GSEs exit conservatorship; and (2) between the March 1, 2021 effective date of the New QM definition,Definition and the delayed mandatory compliance date, market participants could adversely impact our business, financial conditionsatisfy the QM Rule under either the Current QM Definition or the New QM Definition. In December 2020, the CFPB also created a new QM category (“Seasoned QM”) for first-lien, fixed-rate loans that meet certain performance requirements over a 36-month seasoning period and resultsare held in the lender’s portfolio until the end of operations.the seasoning period. As part of its February 23, 2021 announcement, the CFPB stated that it was evaluating whether to initiate a new rule to reconsider the Seasoned QM definition.
The QM Rule requires that points and fees paid at or prior to closing cannot exceed 3% of the total loan amount, with higher points and fees thresholds provided for loan amounts below $100,000. Any mortgage insurance paid by the borrower at or before the time of loan closing that is not refundable on a pro-rata basis must be applied toward the 3% points and fee calculation.
Additionally, any refundable borrower-paid insurance premiums paid at closing in excess of the premium amount payable on an FHA insured loan (currently 175 basis points) must be included in a lender’s QM 3% points and fees calculation. There are no similar restrictions on the points and fees associated with FHA premiums, and thus FHA has a market advantage for smaller balance loans where the 3% cap is more easily reached.
The Dodd-Frank Act also granted the FHA, VA and the USDA flexibility to establish their own definitions of qualified mortgages for their insurance guaranty programs. Both the FHA and VA have created their own definition of qualified mortgages that differ from both the CFPB’s definitionCurrent QM Definition and the current underwriting and product guidelines at the GSEs that are subject to the special exemption.New QM Definition. For example, the FHA’s QM Safe Harbor definition currently applies to loans priced at or less than APOR plus the sum of 115 basis points and the FHA’s annual mortgage insurance premium rate, which is effectively broader than the pricing metric currently being discussed for potential use byQM Safe Harbor adopted under the CFPB as a replacement to theNew QM Patch.Definition. These alternate definitions of qualified mortgages are more favorable to lenders and mortgage holders than the CFPBCFPB’s Current QM RuleDefinition and New QM Definition that appliesapply to loans purchased by the GSEs, and the markets in which we operate, which could drive business to these agencies and have a negative impact on our mortgage insurance business.
Qualified Residential Mortgage Regulations—Securitization Risk Retention Requirements.Requirements
The Dodd-Frank Act requires securitizers to retain at least 5% of the credit risk associated with mortgage loans that they transfer, sell or convey, unless the mortgage loans are qualified residential mortgages (“QRMs”) or are insured by the FHA or another federal agency (the “QRM Rule”). Under applicable federal regulations, a QRM is generally defined as a mortgage meeting the requirements of a qualified mortgage under the CFPB’s QM Rule described above. Because of the capital support provided by the U.S. government to the GSEs, the GSEs currently satisfy the proposed risk retention requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act while they are in conservatorship, so sellers of loans to the GSEs currently are not subject to the risk retention requirements referenced above. This means that securitizers would not be required to retain risk under the QRM Rule on loans that are guaranteed by the GSEs while in conservatorship. The QRM Rule requires the agencies that implemented the rule to review the QRM definition no later than four years after its effective date (i.e., December 2018) and every five years thereafter,
and allows each agency to request a review of the definition at any time. On December 20, 2019, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the SEC, FHFA, and HUD announced the commencement of review of the QRM Rule.Rule, with comments due by February 3, 2020. In June 2020, the agencies reviewing QRM announced that they were extending the review period until June 30, 2021. It is uncertain whether the review of the QRM will result in changes to the QRM definition and what form these changes may take. The outcome of this review may be further complicated by the recent announcement that the CFPB will be exploring options to preserve the Current QM Definition given that the QRM definition historically has been tied to the QM definition.
Other. Other
The Dodd-Frank Act establishes a Federal Insurance Office within the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “FIO”). While the FIO does not have a general supervisory or regulatory authority over the business of insurance, the director of this office performs various functions with respect to insurance, such as serving as a non-voting member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council. It is difficult to predict whether legislators or other executive agencies will pursue the development and implementation of federal standards for the mortgage insurance industry. Any divergence from the current system of state regulation could significantly change compliance burdens and possibly impact our financial condition.
In addition, Section 1473 of the Dodd-Frank Act establishes minimum requirements to be implemented by states regarding the registration and supervision of appraisal management companies (“AMCs”), including Independent SettlementRadian Valuation Services. In 2015, six federal regulatory agencies (the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve Board, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, CFPB and FHFA) approved final rules creating federal minimum requirements for state registration and supervision of AMCs. All AMCs subject to state registration, including Independent SettlementRadian Valuation Services, must satisfy certain minimum standards, including requirements to: (i) establish and comply with processes and controls designed to ensure that an AMC only engages an appraiser who has the appropriate education, expertise and experience necessary to competently complete a particular appraisal assignment and (ii) establish and comply with processes and controls reasonably designed to ensure that the AMC conducts its appraisal management services in accordance with applicable appraisal independence standards and regulations.
RESPA
Settlement service providers in connection with the origination or refinance of a federally regulated mortgage loan are subject to RESPA and Regulation X. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the authority to implement and enforce RESPA was transferred to the CFPB. RESPA authorizes the CFPB, the U.S. Department of Justice, state attorneys general and state insurance commissioners to bring civil enforcement actions, and also provides for criminal penalties and private rights of action.
Mortgage insurance and other products and services provided by Radian’s affiliates are considered settlement services for purposes of RESPA. The anti-referral fee and anti-kickback provisions of Section 8 of RESPA generally provide, among other things, that settlement service providers are prohibited from paying or accepting anything of value in connection with the referral of a settlement service or sharing in fees for those services. RESPA also prohibits requiring the use of an affiliate for settlement services and requires certain information to be disclosed if an affiliate is used to provide the settlement services. In addition to mortgage insurance, through our ServicesReal Estate business we offer a broad array of both settlement and non-settlement services to our customers, including real estate, valuation, hybrid appraisal, title and closing services. To the extent products and services provided by our ServicesReal Estate business are settlement services for purposes of RESPA, the anti-referral fee, anti-kickback, and required use provisions of RESPA would apply which could impact how these products and services are marketed and sold.
In the past, we and other mortgage insurers have faced lawsuits alleging, among other things, that our captive reinsurance arrangements constituted unlawful payments to mortgage lenders under RESPA. We also have been subject to lawsuits alleging that our Pool Mortgage Insurance and contract underwriting services violated RESPA. In addition, we and other mortgage insurers have been subject to inquiries and investigative demands from state and federal governmental agencies, including the CFPB, requesting information relating to captive reinsurance. In April 2013, we reached a settlement with the CFPB that concluded its investigation with respect to Radian Guaranty without any findings of wrongdoing. As part of the settlement, Radian Guaranty paid a civil penalty and agreed that it would not enter into any new captive reinsurance agreement or reinsure any new loans under any existing captive reinsurance agreement for a period of 10 years ending in 2023. In June 2015, Radian Guaranty executed a Consent Order with the Minnesota Department of Commerce that resolved the Minnesota Department of Commerce’s outstanding inquiries related to captive reinsurance arrangements involving mortgage insurance in Minnesota without any findings of wrongdoing. As part of the Consent Order, Radian Guaranty paid a civil penalty and agreed not to enter into new captive reinsurance arrangements until June 2025. We have not entered into any new captive reinsurance arrangements since 2007. In addition, under the PMIERs, the GSEs prohibit private mortgage insurers from entering into captive insurance arrangements.
Homeowner Assistance Programs
The Emergency Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 (“EESA”) included a requirement to “maximize assistance to homeowners and encourage mortgage servicers to take advantage of available programs (including the Hope for Homeowners program) to minimize foreclosures.” In 2008, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan to restructure or refinance mortgages to avoid foreclosures through: (i) refinancing mortgage loans through HARP; (ii) modifying
first- and second-lien mortgage loans through HAMP and the Second Lien Modification Program; and (iii) offering other alternatives to foreclosure through the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program. HAMP expired in December 2016 and was replaced with the “Flex Modification” program that will offeroffers payment relief similar to HAMP. Refinancing under the HARP program expired on December 31, 2018. The GSEs have since established high LTV streamlined refinance programs in coordination with FHFA to continue providing refinancing options to avoid foreclosure. These programs began enrolling participants in November 2018.
The SAFE Act
The SAFE Act and its state law equivalents require mortgage loan originators to be licensed with state agencies in the states in which they operate and/or registered with the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry (the “Registry”). The Registry is a database established by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators that tracks the licensing and eligibility requirements of loan originators. Among other things, the database was established to support the licensing of mortgage loan originators by each state. As part of this licensing and registration process, loan originators who are employees of institutions other than depository institutions or certain of their subsidiaries that, in each case, are regulated by a federal banking agency, must generally be licensed under the SAFE Act guidelines enacted by each state in which they engage in loan origination activities and registered with the Registry. Additionally, most states define underwriting and loan processing as a clerical and administrative duty, performed under the supervision of a licensed mortgage loan originator. The entity and its employees that provide our contract underwriting and loan processing services are compliant with the SAFE Act for underwriting in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and compliant for loan processing in 44 states and the District of Columbia.
Mortgage Insurance Cancellation
The HPA imposes certain cancellation and termination requirements for borrower-paid private mortgage insurance with respect to “residential mortgage transactions” as defined in the HPA, and requires certain disclosures to borrowers regarding their rights under the law. Specifically, the HPA provides that private mortgage insurance on most loans originated on or after July 29, 1999 may be cancelled at the request of the borrower once the LTV reaches 80% of the original value, provided that certain conditions are satisfied. Under HPA, private mortgage insurance on most borrower-paid mortgage insurance, subject to certain exceptions, must be canceled automatically on the date the LTV is scheduled to reach 78% of the original value (or, if the loan is not current on that date, on the date that the loan becomes current).
The HPA establishes special rules for the termination of private mortgage insurance in connection with loans that are “high risk.” The HPA does not define “high risk” loans, but leaves that determination to the GSEs for loans up to the GSE conforming loan limits and to lenders for any other loan. For “high risk” loans, private mortgage insurance must be terminated on the date that the LTV is first scheduled to reach 77% of the unpaid principal balance. In no case, however, may private mortgage insurance be required beyond the midpoint of the amortization period of the loan if the borrower is current on the payments required by the terms of the mortgage.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”)
The FCRA imposes restrictions on the permissible use of credit report information and disclosures that must be made to consumers when information from their credit reports is used. The FCRA has been interpreted by some Federal Trade Commission staff to require mortgage insurance companies to provide “adverse action” notices to consumers in the event an application for mortgage insurance is declined or a higher premium is charged based on the use, wholly or partly, of information contained in the consumer’s credit report.
Privacy and Information Security - Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the “GLBA”) and Other Regulatory Requirements
As part of our business, we, and certain of our subsidiaries, maintain large amounts of confidential information, including non-public personal information on consumers and our employees. We and our customers are subject to a variety of privacy and information security laws and regulations. The GLBA imposes privacy requirements on financial institutions, including obligations to protect and safeguard consumers’ nonpublic personal information and records, and limitations on the re-use of such information. The GLBA is enforced by state insurance regulators and by federal regulatory agencies. In addition, many states have enacted privacy and data security laws that impose compliance obligations beyond GLBA, such as: requiring notification in the event that a security breach results in a reasonable belief that unauthorized persons may have obtained access to consumer nonpublic personal information; imposing additional restrictions on the sale and use of consumers’ personal information; affording consumers new rights of both access and deletion of their personal information; and creating new private rights of action for data breaches. See “—State Regulation—Privacy.Privacy.”
Federal and state agencies have increased their focus on compliance obligations related to privacy, data security and cybersecurity. The CFPB, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and non-governmental regulatory agencies, such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), have announced new compliance measures and enforcement efforts designed to monitor and regulate the protection of personal consumer data, including with respect to: the development and delivery of
financial products and services; underwriting; mortgage servicing; credit reporting; digital payment systems; and vendor management. For information regarding the New York Department of Financial Services cybersecurity regulations and the California Consumer Privacy Act see “—State Regulation—Cybersecurity.Cybersecurity.”
Fair Lending and Fair Servicing
The federal Fair Housing Act (FHA), part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, makes it unlawful for any person whose business includes engaging in residential real estate related transactions to (i) discriminate in housing-related lending activities against any person on a prohibited basis, or (ii) for any person to discriminate in the sale or rental of housing “or in the provision of services or facilities in connection therewith,” to any person because of a prohibited basis. Similarly, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and Regulation B make it unlawful for a creditor to (i) discriminate in any aspect of a credit transaction against an applicant on a prohibited basis during any aspect of a consumer or business credit transaction; (ii) make any oral or written statement to applicants or prospective applicants that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application; or (iii) collect information regarding ethnicity, race, and sex permitted for mortgage loans, but prohibited for other credit products.
These laws seek to address discrimination in lending and other housing related activity by prohibiting discrimination that is intentional or where a facially neutral policy or practice has a “disparate impact;” that is, that it disproportionately excludes or burdens persons on a prohibited basis without a need to demonstrate intentional discrimination. In September of 2020, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued a Final Rule (2020 Rule) which modified the requirements for demonstrating disparate impact claims. The Biden Administration has indicated that it intends to focus heavily on discriminatory and unfair housing practices, including by revisiting the 2020 Rule, which has been criticized as making it more difficult to bring disparate impact claims. To this end, on January 26, 2021, President Biden issued a Memorandum ordering the Secretary of HUD to examine changes made by the 2020 Rule regarding disparate impact. This anticipated shift in policy priorities may lead to increased investigation and enforcement activity by federal regulatory authorities, including the CFPB.
Although we do not believe that our current products and services directly implicate fair lending or servicing, as a provider of products and services that support residential real estate transactions and the mortgage production process, fair lending and servicing laws may impact the way we deliver or conduct our products and services, including in response to customer requirements.
Mortgage Insurance Tax Deduction
In 2006, Congress enacted the private mortgage insurance tax deduction in order to foster homeownership. The deduction was enacted on a temporary basis and it expired at the end of 2011. Since 2011, the private mortgage insurance tax deduction has been extended fivesix times, most recently for insurance premiums paid through December 31, 2020.2021. It is difficult to predict whether the deduction will be extended in the future.
Basel III
Over the past few decades, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) has established international benchmarks for assessing banks’ capital adequacy requirements (“Basel III”). Included within those benchmarks are capital standards related to residential lending and securitization activity and importantly for private mortgage insurers, the capital treatment of mortgage insurance on those loans. These benchmarks are then interpreted and implemented via rulemaking by U.S. banking regulators. In July 2013, the U.S. banking regulators promulgated regulations, referred to as the “U.S. Basel III Rules,” to implement significant elements of the Basel framework. The U.S. Basel III Rules, among other things, revise and enhance the U.S. banking agencies’ general risk-based capital rules. Today, the U.S. Basel III Rules assign a 20%, 50% or 100% risk weight to loans secured by one-to-four-family residential properties. Generally, under the U.S. Basel III Rules in place today, the explicit government guarantees (FHA/VA/USDA) receive a 0% risk weight, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac related loans receive a 20% risk weight. Non-government related mortgage exposures secured by a first lien on a one-to-four family residential property that are prudently underwritten and that are performing according to their original terms receive a 50% risk weighting. All other one-to-four family residential mortgage loans are assigned a 100% risk weight.
In December 2014, the Basel Committee issued a proposal for further revisions to Basel III. It proposed adjustments to the risk weights for residential mortgage exposures that take into account LTV ratio and the borrower’s ability to service a mortgage, which were not previously addressed by Basel III. The proposed LTV ratio did not take into consideration any credit enhancement, including private mortgage insurance, but in March 2015, the U.S. banking regulators clarified that for purposes of the U.S. Basel III Rules, calculation of LTV ratios can account for credit enhancement such as private mortgage insurance in determining whether a loan is made in accordance with prudent underwriting standards for purposes of receiving the preferred 50% risk weight. The comment period for this proposal closed in March 2015, and in December 2015, the Basel Committee released a second proposal which retained the LTV provisions of the initial draft, but not the provisions pertaining to a
borrower’s ability to service a mortgage (the “2015 Basel Committee Proposal”). The comment period for the 2015 Basel Committee Proposal closed in March 2016. To date, federal regulators have not adopted or implemented any new regulations, including based on these proposals, that update or modify the U.S. Basel III Rules.
The revised and final recommendations from the Basel Committee with respect to Basel III were published in December 2017 (the “2017 Basel Committee III Recommendations”), and included finalized risk weighting guidelines for residential mortgage exposures. These rules recognize guarantees provided by sovereign governments (such as FHA, VA, USDA and Ginnie Mae) as off-setting the capital requirements, resulting in a 0% risk weight. While the 2017 Basel Committee III Recommendations include consideration of LTV ratios, including the impact of credit enhancement provided by third-party private mortgage insurance and the GSEs on LTV ratios, the credit enhancement provided by third-party private mortgage insurance and the GSEs would have higher risk weightings than the explicitly government guaranteed products, putting loans insured by private mortgage insurance at a disadvantage. It remains unclear whether new guidelines will be proposed or finalized in the U.S. in response to the most recent 2017 Basel III Committee Recommendations.
EmployeesItem 1A. Risk Factors
At December 31, 2019,
Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted us, and its ultimate impact on our business and financial results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has created periods of significant economic disruption, high unemployment, volatility and disruption in financial markets, and required adjustments in the housing finance system and real estate markets. In addition, the pandemic has resulted in temporary closures of many businesses and the institution of social distancing and sheltering in place requirements in most states and communities in the United States. As a result, the demand for certain of our products and services has been impacted, and this impact may continue for an unknown period and could expand. Our business operations may also be disrupted if significant portions of our workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, remote technology interruptions, quarantines, government actions, or other restrictions related to the pandemic. To date, in response to the pandemic, among other things, we have raised additional capital, aligned our business with the temporary origination and servicing guidelines announced by the GSEs, and activated our business continuity program by transitioning to a work-from-home virtual workforce model with certain essential activities supported by limited staff in office environments that comply with CDC guidelines and applicable state and local requirements.
We expect that the COVID-19 pandemic and measures taken to reduce its spread will continue to impact our business, subjecting us to the following risks:
■As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the economy, including the significant increase in unemployment, we have experienced a material increase in new defaults, including as a result of mortgage forbearance programs.
■The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on new and existing mortgage defaults as well as the amount of capital we are required to hold against COVID-19 related defaults under the PMIERs, could potentially exhaust Radian Guaranty’s excess, or “cushion,” of Available Assets over Minimum Required Assets, in which case we may be required to contribute capital to Radian Guaranty to remain in compliance with the PMIERs financial requirements. The amount that Radian Group could be required to contribute to Radian Guaranty to support PMIERs compliance is uncertain, but could be significant and, under extreme economic scenarios, exhaust Radian Group’s available liquidity. See “—The credit performance of our mortgage insurance portfolio is impacted by macroeconomic conditions and specific events that affect the ability of borrowers to pay their mortgages,”“—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity” and “—Radian Group’s sources of liquidity may be insufficient to fund its obligations.”
■The pandemic has placed additional significant strain on the operations and financial condition of mortgage servicers, which could result in the disruption of the servicing of mortgage loans covered by our insurance policies or result in servicers failing to appropriately report the status of loans, including whether the loans are subject to a COVID-19-related forbearance program. We could receive less mortgage insurance premiums as a result of loans going into default. See “—Our business depends, in part, on effective and reliable loan servicing.”
■The assumptions upon which we base our premium rates may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, especially in a period of high market volatility and economic uncertainty such as we have experienced as a result of the pandemic. We have experienced a material increase in new defaults as a result of the pandemic and we may continue to experience a high volume of new defaults associated with the pandemic in future periods. Future new defaults are not currently reflected in our mortgage insurance loss reserves because we generally are not permitted to establish reserves in anticipation of such defaults. As a result of the material increase in new defaults that we have experienced, our loss reserves increased significantly in 2020. Our loss reserves may again increase significantly in future periods as a result of new defaults stemming from the pandemic, which would negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. See “—Our success depends on our ability to assess and manage our underwriting risks; the premiums we charge may not be adequate to compensate us for our liability for losses and the amount of capital we are required to hold against our insured risks. We expect to incur losses for future defaults beyond what we have reserved for in our financial statements.”
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
■The GSEs’ business practices have changed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, with the primary objectives of supporting borrowers impacted by the pandemic and protecting the ongoing functioning of the housing finance system. As the situation continues to evolve, the actions of the FHFA and GSEs in response to COVID-19 are likely to continue to significantly impact the housing finance system. Because traditional mortgage insurance is an important component of this system, these actions have had, approximately 2,000 employees employedand may continue to have, a significant impact on our mortgage insurance operations and performance. See “—Changes in the charters, business practices, or role of the GSEs in the U.S. housing market generally, could significantly impact our businesses.”
■The number of home purchases or mortgage refinancings may be materially affected by the impact of the pandemic on general economic conditions, including unemployment, and on the availability of credit for mortgage loans. In addition, public and private sector initiatives to reduce the transmission of COVID-19, such as the imposition of restrictions on business activities, and various policy initiatives to keep people in their homes during the pandemic through foreclosure and eviction moratoriums may affect the number of new mortgages available for us to insure and the demand for certain of the products and services in our Real Estate business. See“—A decrease in the volume of mortgage originations could result in fewer opportunities for us to write new mortgage insurance business and conduct our Real Estate business.”
■As a result of COVID-19-related relief programs, we anticipate that defaults related to the pandemic, if not cured, could remain in our defaulted loan inventory for a protracted period of time, potentially resulting in higher levels of claims and Claim Severity for those loans that ultimately result in a claim. See “—An extension in the period of time that a loan remains in our defaulted loan inventory may increase the severity of claims that we ultimately are required to pay.”
■The models, assumptions and estimates we use to establish loss reserves may not be accurate, especially in the event of an extended economic downturn or a period of extreme market volatility and economic uncertainty such as we have experienced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, the ultimate cure rate for loan defaults resulting from the pandemic may be lower than we have previously experienced in the context of other FEMA declared emergencies and lower than our expectations. See “—If the estimates we use in establishing loss reserves are incorrect, we may be required to take unexpected charges to income, which could adversely affect our results of operations.”
■The rating agencies continually review the financial strength ratings assigned to Radian Group and its mortgage insurance subsidiaries, and the ratings are subject to change. The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our financial results and condition, could cause one or more of the rating agencies to downgrade the ratings assigned to Radian Group and its mortgage insurance subsidiaries. FollowingSee “—The current financial strength ratings assigned to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries could weaken our competitive position and potential downgrades by rating agencies to these ratings and the saleratings assigned to Radian Group could adversely affect the Company”
■The markets for credit and interest-rate-sensitive securities have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The value of Claytonour fixed income securities has been volatile, which increases the risk that we will not achieve our investment objectives. If, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, we underestimate our liabilities or improperly structure our investments to meet our expected liabilities, including claim payments in January 2020, our totalmortgage insurance business, we could have unexpected losses resulting from the forced liquidation of investments before their maturity, which could adversely affect our results of operations. See“—Our success depends, in part, on our ability to manage risks in our investment portfolio.”
Although we are uncertain of the ultimate magnitude or duration of the business and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, their long-term effect on our businesses will depend on, among other things: the extent and duration of the pandemic; the severity of and the number of employees decreasedpeople infected with the virus and the widespread availability of anti-viral treatments and vaccines, especially as new strains of COVID-19 have been discovered; the wider economic effects of the pandemic and the scope and duration of governmental and other third-party measures restricting day-to-day life and business operations; the impact of economic stimulus efforts to approximately 1,400. Management considers employee relationssupport the economy through the pandemic; and governmental and GSE programs implemented to assist borrowers experiencing a COVID-19-related hardship, including forbearance programs and suspensions of foreclosures and evictions. Due to the unprecedented and continually evolving social and economic impacts associated with the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. and global economies generally, and in particular on the U.S. housing, real estate and housing finance markets, there is significant uncertainty regarding the ultimate impact on our business, business prospects, operating results and financial condition and our estimates or predictions regarding such impact may be good.materially wrong.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.Risks Related to Regulatory Matters
Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs.GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity.
In order to be eligible to insure loans purchased by the GSEs, mortgage insurers such as Radian Guaranty must meet the GSEs’ eligibility requirements, or PMIERs. The PMIERs are comprehensive, covering virtually all aspects of the business of a private mortgage insurer, including internal risk management and quality controls, the relationship between the GSEs and the approved insurer and the approved insurer’s financial condition, as well as extensivecondition. In addition, the PMIERs contain requirements related to the conduct and operations of aour mortgage insurer’s business.insurance business, including extensive operational requirements in areas such as claim processing, loss mitigation, document retention, underwriting, quality control, reporting and monitoring, among others. These extensive operational requirements have resulted in additional expenses and have required substantial time and effort from management
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
and our employees, which we expect will continue. If Radian Guaranty is unable to satisfy the requirements set forth in the PMIERs, Freddie Mac and/or Fannie Maeincluding the financial requirements discussed below, the GSEs could restrict it from conducting certain types of business with them or take actions that may include not purchasing loans insured by Radian Guaranty.
The PMIERs include financial requirements currently requireincorporating a risk-based framework that requires a mortgage insurer’s Available Assets to meet or exceed its Minimum Required Assets. At December 31, 2019, Radian Guaranty was in compliance with theThe PMIERs financial requirements include increased financial requirements for defaulted loans, as well as for performing loans with a higher likelihood of default and/or certain credit characteristics, such as higher LTVs and had Available Assets of $3.6 billion, which resulted in an excess or “cushion” of $804 million over its Minimum Required Assets of $2.8 billion.lower FICO credit scores. Radian Guaranty’s ability to continue to comply with the PMIERs financial requirements could be impacted by, among other factors: (i) the volume and product mix of our NIW andNIW; (ii) factors affecting the performance of our mortgage insurance portfolio, including ourthe level of new defaults prepayments,and prepayments; (iii) for existing defaults, the aging of these existing defaults and whether they are subject to, and remain in, forbearance programs, and the ultimate losses we incur on new or existing defaults anddefaults; (iv) the credit characteristicsapplication of our mortgage insurance; (ii)the Disaster Related Capital Charge (as discussed below) under the PMIERs; (v) the amount of credit that we receive under the PMIERs financial requirements for our third-party reinsurance transactions (which is subject to initial and ongoing review by the GSEs); and (iii)(vi) potential amendments or updates to the PMIERs, including an increase in the capital requirements under the PMIERs financial requirements.
Under the PMIERs financial requirements there are increased financial requirements for loans with a higher likelihood of default and/or certain credit characteristics, such as higher LTVs and lower FICO scores, as well as for loans originated after January 1, 2016 that are insured under lender-paid mortgage insurance policies not subject to automatic termination under the HPA. Therefore, ifPMIERs. If our mix of business includes more loans that are subject to thesethe increased financial requirements it increasesunder the amount of Available Assets that Radian Guaranty is required to hold. Depending on the circumstances,PMIERs, we may limit the type and volume of business we are willing to write for certain of our products based on the increased financial requirements associated with certain loans. This could reduce the amount of NIW we write, which could reduce our future revenues. Additionally, as
The COVID-19 pandemic has created periods of significant economic disruption, high unemployment, volatility and disruption in financial markets, and required adjustments in the housing finance system and real estate markets. As a result, we have experienced a material increase in new defaults, substantially all related to defaults of loans subject to forbearance programs implemented in response to the past,COVID-19 pandemic. The overall volume of new defaults resulting from the pandemic has resulted in an increase in Radian Guaranty’s Minimum Required Assets and has negatively impacted Radian Guaranty’s PMIERs Cushion. We may continue to experience a high level of defaults as a result of the pandemic for the foreseeable future, which defaults would continue to negatively impact Radian Guaranty’s Minimum Required Assets and our insuredresults of operations. The amount of Minimum Required Assets that Radian Guaranty is and will be required to maintain, will depend on the number, timing and duration of defaults, including those defaulted loans participating in forbearance programs. This, in turn, will depend on the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, its resulting impact on the economy, including unemployment and housing prices, and the ability of current and any future government programs to provide economic and individual relief, all of which will likely have an impact on the ability of borrowers to remain current on their mortgage payments and, if they have entered into forbearance or other relief programs, to resume making payments upon the expiration of the forbearance period. Based on the date each loan in our delinquent inventory was reported to us as being in forbearance, we estimate that during the first half of 2021, a significant majority of those loans in forbearance will have been in forbearance for 12 months, and unless extended, their forbearance plans may experience increased defaultsterminate. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—CARES Act” and “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—GSE Requirements” for information regarding forbearance programs for borrowers experiencing financial hardship related to the pandemic.
As discussed in “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—GSE Requirements,” the future. Increases in defaults,PMIERs apply a 0.30 multiplier to the Minimum Required Asset factor for loans that have become non-performing as a result of a “FEMA Declared Major Disaster” event, including as a result of natural disasters,participation in a forbearance program. This effectively reduces the Minimum Required Asset amount for these loans by 70%. Under National Emergency Guidelines issued by the GSEs, the PMIERs were temporarily amended so that the Disaster Related Capital Charge is currently being applied nationwide to certain non-performing loans that we refer to as COVID-19 Defaulted Loans, which comprise non-performing loans that either: (i) have an Initial Missed Payment (discussed below) occurring during the COVID-19 Crisis Period or (ii) are subject to a forbearance plan granted in response to a financial hardship related to COVID-19 (which is assumed under the COVID-19 Amendment to be the case for any loan that has an Initial Missed Payment occurring during the COVID-19 Crisis Period and is subject to a forbearance plan), the terms of which are materially consistent with the terms of forbearance plans offered by the GSEs. The National Emergency Guidelines state that they will be updated if the GSEs determine that the COVID-19 Crisis Period needs to be extended. In December 2020, the GSEs extended the COVID-19 Crisis Period through March 31, 2021 and it is uncertain whether the COVID-19 Crisis Period will be further extended in the future. If the COVID-19 Crisis Period is not extended, then pursuant to the COVID-19 Amendment, the Disaster Related Capital Charge would continue to apply nationwide to defaults subject Radian Guaranty to an increasea COVID-19 related forbearance plan for as long as the GSEs choose to leave the National Emergency Guidelines in place.
The current broad-based application of the Disaster Related Capital Charge has materially reduced the total amount of Minimum Required Assets underthat Radian Guaranty otherwise would have been required to hold against COVID-19 Defaulted Loans. Primarily as a consequence of the Disaster Related Capital Charge, Radian Guaranty maintained a significant PMIERs Cushion as of December 31, 2020. While we expect that application of the Disaster Related Capital Charge will continue to materially reduce Radian Guaranty’s Minimum Required Assets for COVID-19 Defaulted Loans, the benefit that Radian Guaranty currently is receiving from the Disaster Related Capital Charge is expected to diminish over time. The reduction of this benefit could be accelerated if the GSEs were to terminate the temporary COVID-19 Amendment to the PMIERs issued under their National Emergency Guidelines. See, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and therefore, could impactAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Mortgage” for more information on the declining benefit of the Disaster Related Capital Charge received over time.
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
As the benefits of the Disaster Related Capital Charge diminish, or if existing and future new defaults continue to materially increase Radian Guaranty’s Minimum Required Assets, we may be required or otherwise choose to: (i) contribute capital to Radian Guaranty; (ii) alter our compliancestrategy with respect to our NIW; or (iii) seek additional capital relief through reinsurance or otherwise, which may not be available on acceptable terms or on terms that would be approved by the PMIERs or negatively impact our results of operations.GSEs.
The GSEs may amend the PMIERs at any time although the GSEs have communicated that for material changes, including material changes affecting Minimum Required Assets, they will generally provide written notice 180 days prior to the effective date. The GSEsand also have broad discretion to interpret the PMIERs, which could impact the calculation of Radian Guaranty’s Available Assets and/or Minimum Required Assets. The most recent large-scale revisions to PMIERs, or PMIERs 2.0, became
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
effective on March 31, 2019.2019 and the PMIERs were further updated as part of the temporary COVID-19 Amendment to the PMIERs under the National Emergency Guidelines. We expect the GSEs to continue to update the PMIERs periodically in the future, including ifpotentially to align the PMIERs 2.0 financial requirements with the increased capital requirements for the GSEs under the ERCF that was finalized in December 2020 and/or the proposed new liquidity requirements for the GSEs. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—GSE Requirements” and when there are changes to“Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform and the GSEs’ capital requirements, such as ifBusiness Practices” for additional information on the ERCF and when the CCF is finalized.proposed GSE liquidity requirements.
Compliance with the PMIERs financial requirements could impact our holding company liquidity. Ifliquidity if additional capital support for Radian Guaranty is required for it to supportmaintain this compliance. The amount of capital that Radian Guaranty’s compliance with the PMIERs financial requirements,Group could be required to contribute to Radian Guaranty for this purpose is uncertain, but could be significant and, under extreme economic scenarios, could exhaust Radian Group’s available liquidity. See “—Radian Group’s sources of liquidity may be insufficient to fund its obligations.” Further, if Radian Guaranty becomes capital constrained, it may make itbe more difficult for Radian Guaranty to return capital to Radian Group, inwhich would compound the form of dividends or otherwise, and depending on the circumstances, could requirenegative liquidity impact to Radian Group of the contributions it may be required to contribute capital through capital contributions or surplus notesmake to Radian Guaranty which wouldand leave less liquidity to satisfy Radian Group’s other obligations. Depending on the amount of liquidity that is utilized from Radian Group, we may be required (or may decide) to seek additional capital by incurring additional debt, issuing additional equity, or selling assets, which we may not be able to do on favorable terms, if at all.
In addition to the PMIERs financial requirements, the PMIERs contain requirements related to the operations of our mortgage insurance business, including extensive operational requirements in areas such as claim processing, loss mitigation, document retention, underwriting, quality control, reporting and monitoring, among others. These increased operational requirements have resulted in additional expenses and have required substantial time and effort from management and our employees, which we expect will continue.
The PMIERs prohibit Radian Guaranty from engaging in certain activities such as insuring loans originated or serviced by an affiliate (except under certain circumstances) and require Radian Guaranty to obtain the prior consent of the GSEs before taking many actions, which may include, among other things, entering into variouscertain intercompany agreements, settling loss mitigation disputes with customers and commuting risk, among others.risk. Further, pursuant to the National Emergency Guidelines, through June 30, 2021, the consent of the GSEs is required for Radian Guaranty to: (i) pay dividends or make payments of principal or increase payments of interest beyond those commitments made prior to June 30, 2020 associated with the Surplus Notes; (ii) make any other payments, unless related to expenses incurred in the normal course of business or to commitments made prior to June 30, 2020; (iii) pledge or transfer asset(s) to any affiliate or investor; or (iv) enter into any new arrangements or alter any existing arrangements under tax-sharing and intercompany expense-sharing agreements other than renewals and extensions of agreements in effect prior to June 30, 2020. These restrictions could prohibit or delay Radian Guaranty from taking certain actions that would be advantageous to it or its affiliates.to Radian Group.
Although we expect Radian Guaranty to retain its eligibility status with the GSEs and to continue to comply with the PMIERs financial requirements, including as potentially updated in the future, we cannot provide assurance that this will occur. Loss of Radian Guaranty’s eligibility status with the GSEs would have an immediate and material adverse impact on the franchise value of our mortgage insuranceMortgage business and our future prospects, as well as a material negative impact on our future results of operations and financial condition.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to comprehensive state insurance regulations and other requirements, which we may fail to satisfy.
We and our insurance subsidiaries are subject to comprehensive, detailed regulation by the insurance regulators in the states where they are domiciled or licensed to transact business. These regulations are principally designed for the protection of our insurance policyholders rather than for the benefit of our investors. Insurance laws vary from state to state, but generally grant broad supervisory powers to examine insurance companies and enforce rules or exercise discretion affecting almost every significant aspect of the insurance business, including the power to revoke or restrict an insurance company’s ability to write new business. Among other matters, the state insurance regulators impose various capital requirements on our insurance subsidiaries.
State insurance capital requirements for our mortgage insurance subsidiaries include Risk-to-capital ratios, other risk-based capital measures and surplus requirements that may limit the amount of insurance that our mortgage insurance subsidiaries write or the ability of our insurance subsidiaries to distribute capital to Radian Group. Similarly, our title insurance subsidiary is required to maintain statutory premium reserves that vary by state and are subject to periodic reviews of certain financial performance ratios, and the results of those ratios could result in additional capital requirements in states where it is licensed. OurSee “Item 1. Business—Regulation—State Regulation” for more information on these requirements. Among other things, our failure to maintain adequate levels of capital in our mortgage insurance and title insurance subsidiaries among other things, could lead to intervention by the various insurance regulatory authorities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, business prospects and financial condition.
With respect to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries, there are 16 states that currently impose a Statutory RBC Requirement. If Radian Guaranty is not in compliance with a state’s applicable Statutory RBC Requirement, it may be prohibited from writing new business in that state until it is back in compliance or it receives a waiver of, or similar relief from, the requirement. As of December 31, 2019, Radian Guaranty was in compliance with all applicable Statutory RBC Requirements. In states that do not have a Statutory RBC Requirement, it is not clear what actions the applicable state regulators would take if a mortgage insurer fails to meet the Statutory RBC Requirement established by another state. If Radian Guaranty were to fail to meet the Statutory RBC Requirement in one or more states, it could be required to suspend writing business in some or all of the states in which it does business. In addition, the GSEs and our mortgage lending customers may decide not to conduct new business with Radian Guaranty (or may reduce current business levels) or impose restrictions on Radian Guaranty whileif it wasis not in compliance.compliance with applicable state insurance requirements. The franchise value of our mortgage insurance business likely would be
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
significantly diminished if we were prohibited from writing new business or restricted in the amount of new business we could
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
write in one or more states. For additional information about statutory surplus and other state insurance requirements, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Mortgage”, as well as Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Radian Group also may be required to provide capital support for Radian Guaranty and its affiliated insurers if additional capital is required by those subsidiaries pursuant to future changes to insurance laws and regulations. The NAIC is in the process of reviewing the minimum capital and surplus requirements for mortgage insurers and considering changes to the Model Act. The NAICIn December 2019, a working group overseeing this initiative hasof state regulators released an exposure draftdrafts of a revised Model Act, including new proposed mortgage guaranty insurance capital requirements.requirements for mortgage insurers. While the process for developing this framework was inactive as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we understand the initiative remains active and that an effort to resume work on the exposure draft is expected in 2021. As proposed, the capital requirements set forth in the current exposure draft are impacted by, among other things, by changes in the economic and housing environment, including changes in home prices and incomes. Although theThe ultimate outcome of this process remains uncertain, givenincluding if and when the current economic and housing environment, ifprocess may be completed, the exposure draftpotential form of theany new Model Act was adopted and in effect today, we do not believe that the capital requirements, imposed by the new Model Act would exceed those of the current PMIERs financial requirements.and how they may be implemented and enforced.
The mortgage insurance industry has always been highly competitive with respect to pricing. Our mortgage insurance subsidiaries’ premium rates and policy forms are generally subject to regulation in every state in which they are licensed to transact business. These regulations are intended to protect policyholders against the adverse effects of excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory rates and to encourage fair competition in the insurance marketplace. In most states where our insurance subsidiaries are licensed, premium rates and policy forms must be filed with the state insurance regulatory authority and, in some states, must be approved, before their use. We may be subject to regulatory inquiries or examinations with respect to our mortgage insurance premium rates and policy forms.
Our Similarly, our title insurance business is subject to extensive rate regulation by the applicable state agencies in the states in which it operates. Title insurance rates are regulated differently in various states, with some states requiring the subsidiaries to file and receive approval of rates before such rates become effective and some states promulgating the rates that can be charged. In general, premium rates are determined on the basis of historical data for claim frequency and severity as well as related production costs and other expenses.
Given that the premium rates for our insurance subsidiaries are highly regulated, we could lose business opportunities and fail to successfully implement our business strategies if our rates are deemed non-compliant or are subject to investigation, if new rates and policy forms are not approved as may be required, or if we are otherwise unable to respond to competitor pricing actions and our customers’ demands in a timely and compliant manner.
The credit performanceChanges in the charters, business practices, or role of the GSEs in the U.S. housing market generally, could significantly impact our businesses.
Our current business model is highly dependent on the GSEs as the GSEs are the primary beneficiaries of most of our mortgage insurance portfolio ispolicies. Changes in the business practices of the GSEs, which can be implemented by the GSEs acting independently or through their conservator, the FHFA, could negatively impact our businesses and financial performance. Examples of potential changes that could impact our business, may include, without limitation:
■eligibility requirements for a mortgage insurer to become and remain an approved eligible insurer for the GSEs;
■underwriting standards on mortgages they purchase, including as a result of the FHFA’s more recent focus on reducing the GSEs’ risk profile with respect to loans with multiple higher risk characteristics;
■policies or requirements that may result in a reduction in the number of mortgages they acquire;
■the national conforming loan limit for mortgages they acquire;
■the level of mortgage insurance required;
■the terms on which mortgage insurance coverage may be canceled before reaching the cancellation thresholds established by law;
■the terms required to be included in master policies for the mortgage insurance policies they acquire, including limitations on our ability to mitigate losses on insured mortgages that are in default;
■the amount of loan level price adjustments or guarantee fees, which often result in a higher cost to borrowers, that the GSEs charge on loans that require mortgage insurance; and
■the degree of influence that the GSEs have over a mortgage lender’s selection of the mortgage insurer providing coverage.
In addition, as discussed above under “—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity,” the GSEs’ business practices have changed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, with the primary objectives of supporting borrowers impacted by macroeconomic conditionsthe pandemic and specific events that affectprotecting the abilityongoing functioning of borrowers to pay their mortgages.
As a seller of mortgage credit protection, our results are subject to macroeconomic conditions and specific events that impact the housing finance and real estatesystem. The significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on housing markets including events that impact mortgage originations and the credit performancehousing finance system is wide-ranging and unprecedented in scope. As the situation continues to evolve, the actions or potential inactions of our mortgage insurance portfolio. Many of these conditionsthe FHFA and GSEs in response to COVID-19 are beyond our control, including housing prices, unemployment levels, interest rate changes, the availability of credit and other factors that may be derived from national and regional economic conditions. In general, a deterioration in economic conditions increases the likelihood that borrowers will be unable to satisfy their mortgage obligations. A deteriorating economy can adversely affect housing values, which in turn can influence the willingness of borrowerslikely to continue to make mortgage payments despite having the financial resources to do so.
Mortgage defaults can occur due tohave a variety of specific events affecting borrowers, including death or illness, divorce or other family problems, unemployment, or other events. In addition, factors impacting regional economic conditions, acts of terrorism, war or other severe conflicts, event-specific economic depressions or other catastrophic events such as natural disasters and pandemics could result in increased defaults due to thesignificant impact of such events on the abilityoverall functioning of borrowersthe housing finance system. Because traditional mortgage insurance is an important component of this system and because our businesses depend on the health of the housing finance system and housing markets in particular, these actions have impacted, and may continue to satisfy their mortgage obligations and the value of affected homes.
Unfavorable macroeconomic developments and the other factors cited above could have a material negative impact on our results ofbusiness operations and financial condition.performance.
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
Under its current Trump-appointed leadership, the FHFA has been focused on recapitalizing the GSEs in preparation for releasing them from conservatorship. In December 2020, the FHFA finalized the ERCF, establishing new increased capital requirements for the GSEs, and the FHFA also has proposed new liquidity requirements for the GSEs that remain subject to public comment. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform and the GSEs’ Business Practices” for further information about the specific requirements established by the ERCF and the proposed new liquidity requirements. Taken together, compliance with the increased capital requirements imposed by the ERCF and the proposed new GSE liquidity requirements could significantly alter the business practices and operations of the GSEs, including potentially increasing GSE pricing and decreasing the GSEs’ use of credit risk transfer. An increase in GSE pricing could make alternatives to the GSEs such as FHA insured loans or the private securitization market more attractive, which could reduce the GSEs’ market position and reduce the number of loans available for private mortgage insurance. Further, the GSEs may seek to amend the PMIERs financial requirements in the future to align with the ERCF and the GSE liquidity requirements, once finalized. It remains uncertain if, when and how the PMIERs ultimately may be aligned with the ERCF, however, the changes could include: (i) an increase in the level of Radian Guaranty’s required capital and (ii) a decrease in the amount of PMIERs’ capital relief that Radian Guaranty receives for existing or future reinsurance or insurance-linked notes transactions.
There are many considerations related to financial, underwriting, risk management, counterparty and operational areas that likely would need to be addressed by the GSEs in order to come into compliance with the ERCF and proposed liquidity requirements, many of which could have an effect on the conventional purchase market and potentially our business with the GSEs. For example, the current FHFA leadership has stated that while the GSEs’ capital position remains limited compared to the amount of risk they hold, the GSEs should make risk-based decisions commensurate with their limited capital positions, which could influence the type of risk the GSEs are willing to write and the FHFA’s oversight decisions regarding the GSEs. There is a heightened risk that the current FHFA leadership may seek to take actions that may have the effect of allocating a greater portion of the high-LTV market to the FHA such as the recent amendment to the PSPAs that restricts the GSEs’ acquisition of higher-risk single-family mortgage loans.
The lengthGSEs have in the past and may in the future pursue new products and activities in pursuit of timetheir business strategies, including credit risk transfer transactions and structures that compete with private mortgage insurance. In 2018, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae announced the launch of pilot programs, IMAGIN and EPMI, respectively, as alternative ways for lenders to obtain credit enhancement and sell loans with LTVs greater than 80% to the GSEs. If these programs or any future credit risk transfer transactions and structures were to displace primary loan level or standard levels of mortgage insurance, the amount of mortgage insurance we write may be reduced, which could negatively impact our franchise value, results of operations and financial condition. The FHFA recently released for comment a proposed rule regarding the process for how it will consider and approve new GSE activities and products; however, this proposed rule is intended to apply to any future pilot programs, and therefore, it not certain whether the same standards and procedures proposed in the new rule also would apply to existing pilots such as IMAGIN and EPMI. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform and the GSEs’ Business Practices” for further discussion of IMAGIN and EPMI and additional information about the proposed rule discussed above.
The future direction of the GSEs and their role in the housing finance system could be impacted by the recent change in Administrations. With respect to the FHFA, the Biden Administration’s influence likely will be limited to the extent the FHFA continues to be led by its current leadership team, which was appointed under the Trump Administration for a five-year term beginning in April 2019. If it is determined under litigation currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court that the FHFA director is removable by the President other than for cause, the Biden Administration may move to replace the current director of the FHFA with an appointee that may be more inclined to institute the principles set forth in the Biden Administration’s housing plan. These changes may include a less restrictive, more expansionary approach to the GSEs in order to provide broader access to affordable homeownership for low- and moderate-income borrowers. In addition, as compared to the current FHFA leadership team, a Biden appointed director may choose to deprioritize exiting the GSEs from conservatorship, and therefore, may be more inclined to delay the implementation of, or make changes to, the ERCF and proposed GSE liquidity requirements. A change in policy priorities at the FHFA could alter the GSEs’ business practices in ways that have a significant impact on our businesses.
Although we believe that traditional private mortgage insurance will continue to play an important role in any future housing finance structure, developments in the practices of the GSEs, including potentially new federal legislation, changes to existing statutes, rules or regulations, or interpretations of existing statutes, rules or regulations that reduce the level of private mortgage insurance coverage used by the GSEs as credit enhancement, or even eliminate the requirement, may diminish the franchise value of our mortgage insurance policies remainbusiness and materially and adversely affect our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
Legislation and administrative and regulatory changes and interpretations could impact our businesses.
Our businesses are subject to and may be impacted by many federal and state lending, insurance and consumer laws and regulations and may be affected by changes in forcethese laws and regulations or the way they are interpreted or applied, as well as changes in other laws and regulations that may affect corporations more generally. In particular, our businesses may be significantly impacted by the following:
■legislation, administrative or regulatory action impacting the charters or business practices of the GSEs;
■reform of the U.S. housing finance system;
■legislation and regulation impacting the FHA and its competitive position versus private mortgage insurers;
■the enforcement of fair lending and fair servicing laws to ensure equitable housing finance and real estate markets;
■state insurance laws and regulations that address, among other items, licensing of companies to transact business, claims handling, reinsurance requirements, premium rates, policy forms offered to customers and requirements for Risk-to-capital, minimum policyholder positions, reserves (including contingency reserves), surplus, reinsurance and payment of dividends;
■the application of state, federal or private sector programs aimed at supporting borrowers and the housing market;
■the application of RESPA, the FCRA and other laws to our businesses;
■the application of real estate brokerage and other licensing requirements to our Real Estate businesses and strategic initiatives;
■new federal standards and oversight for mortgage insurers, including as a result of the recommendation of the Federal Insurance Office of the U.S. Department of the Treasury that federal standards and oversight for mortgage insurers be developed and implemented;
■the application of information security and consumer privacy regulations to our businesses;
■the implementation of new regulations under, or the potential repeal or amendment of provisions of, the Dodd-Frank Act;
■the implementation in the U.S. of the Basel III capital adequacy guidelines; and
■broader legislative and regulatory changes, including the adoption of (or failure to adopt) new laws and regulations, or changes in existing laws and regulations, or the way they are interpreted or applied, including potential changes in tax law.
See “Item 1. Business—Regulation.”
Any of the items discussed above could declineadversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and result in a decreasebusiness prospects. In addition, our businesses could be impacted by new legislation or regulations, as well as changes to existing legislation or regulations or the way they are interpreted or applied, including changes that are not currently contemplated and which could occur at any time.
Risks Related to our Mortgage and Real Estate Businesses
Our success depends on our ability to assess and manage our underwriting risks; the premiums we charge may not be adequate to compensate us for our liability for losses and the amount of capital we are required to hold against our insured risks. We expect to incur losses for future defaults beyond what we have reserved for in our future revenues.financial statements.
AsThe estimates and expectations we use to establish premium rates are based on assumptions made at the time our insurance is written.Our mortgage insurance premium rates are based on, among other items, our expectations about competitive and economic conditions and our cost of December 31, 2019, 72%capital, as well as a broad range of other factors and risk attributes that we consider in developing our total primary IIF consistsassumptions about the credit performance of policies for whichthe loans we insure and the economic benefits we expect to receive from our insurance policies. Our assumptions may ultimately prove to be inaccurate, especially in a period of high market volatility and economic uncertainty as currently exists due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The risk of inaccurate or unreliable data may have an adverse impact on our ability to effectively perform critical business operations, such as servicing, loss management, external reporting or data-driven internal analysis. The premium structure we apply is subject to approval by state regulatory agencies, which can delay or limit our ability to increase our premiums inif further filings or approvals are necessary to institute pricing adjustments.
If the future, typically through Monthly Premium Policies.risk underlying a mortgage loan that we have insured develops more adversely than we anticipated, we generally cannot increase the premium rates on this in-force business, or cancel coverage or elect not to renew coverage, to mitigate the effects of such adverse developments. Similarly, we cannot adjust our premiums if the amount of capital we are required to hold against our insured risks increases from the amount we were required to hold at the time a policy was written. As a result, mostif we are unable to compensate for or offset the increased capital requirements in other ways, the returns on our business may be lower than we assumed or expected. Our premiums earned and the associated investment income on those premiums may ultimately prove to be inadequate to compensate for the losses that we may incur and may not provide an adequate return on
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
increased capital that may be required. As a result, our results of operations and financial condition could be negatively impacted.
Additionally, in accordance with industry practice, we do not establish reserves in our mortgage insurance business until we are notified that a borrower has failed to make at least two monthly payments when due. Because our mortgage insurance reserving does not account for the impact of future losses that we expect to incur with respect to performing (non-defaulted) loans, our obligation for ultimate losses that we expect to incur at any period end is not reflected in our financial statements, except to the extent that a premium deficiency exists. As discussed above in “—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity,” the pandemic could result in a high volume of new defaults, both as a result of payment forbearance programs and otherwise, in future periods. As future defaults are not currently reflected in our mortgage insurance loss reserves, our loss reserves could increase significantly in future periods if we experience a high volume of new defaults in future periods, which would negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
If the estimates we use in establishing loss reserves are incorrect, we may be required to take unexpected charges to income, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We establish loss reserves in our mortgage insurance business to provide for the estimated cost of future claims on defaulted loans. Setting our loss reserves requires significant judgment by management with respect to the likelihood, magnitude and timing of each potential loss, including an estimate of the impact of our earned premiumsLoss Mitigation Activities with respect to defaulted loans. The models, assumptions and estimates we use to establish loss reserves may not prove to be accurate, especially in the event of an extended economic downturn or a period of extreme market volatility and economic uncertainty, such as we are derived from insurancecurrently experiencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Because of this, claims paid may be substantially different than our loss reserves and these reserves may be insufficient to satisfy the full amount of claims that was writtenwe ultimately have to pay. Changes to our loss reserve estimates could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, as a result of COVID-19-related relief programs, we anticipate that defaults related to the pandemic, if not cured, could remain in prior years. The lengthour defaulted loan inventory for a protracted period of time, resulting in a higher likelihood of claim and higher levels of Claim Severity for those loans that ultimately result in a claim. See “—An extension in the period of time that this insurancea loan remains in force, whichour defaulted loan inventory may increase the severity of claims that we referultimately are required to aspay.”
A portion of the Persistency Rate, isdefaulted loans in our portfolio originated in the years prior to and including 2008 have been in default for an extended period of time. While these loans are generally assigned a higher loss reserve based on our belief that they are more likely to result in a claim, we also assume, based on historical trends, that a significant driverportion of our future revenues, withthese loans will cure or otherwise not result in a lower overall Persistency Rate generally reducing our future revenues. The factors affectingclaim. Given the lengthsignificant period of time that these loans have been in default, it is possible that the ultimate cure rate for these defaulted loans will be less than our insurance remains in force include:
prevailing mortgage interest rates comparedcurrent estimates of Cures for this inventory of defaults, due to the mortgage rates on our IIF, which affects the incentive for borrowers to refinance (i.e., lower current interest rates make it more attractive for borrowers to refinance and receive a lower interest rate);
applicable policies for mortgage insurance cancellation, along with the current valuenegative impacts of the homes underlying the mortgages in our IIF;
the credit policies of lenders, which may make it more difficult for homeowners to refinance loans; and
economic conditions that can affect a borrower’s decision to pay off a mortgage earlier than required, including the strength of the housing market, which impacts a borrower’s prospects for selling their existing home and finding a suitable and affordable new home.COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise.
If these or other factors cause a decrease in the length of time that our Monthly Premium Policies (or other policies for whichloss reserve estimates are inadequate, we expectmay be required to receive premiums in the future) remain in force,increase our future revenues could be negatively impacted,reserves, which could negatively impacthave a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our Loss Mitigation Activity is not expected to mitigate mortgage insurance losses to the same extent as in prior years; Loss Mitigation Activity could continue to negatively impact our customer relationships.
As part of our claims management process we pursue opportunities to mitigate losses both before and after we receive claims, including processes to ensure claims are valid. Following the financial crisis, our Loss Mitigation Activities, such as Rescissions, Claim Denials and Claim Curtailments, increased significantly in response to the poor underwriting, servicer negligence and general non-compliance with our insurance policies that was prevalent in the period leading up to the financial crisis. These Loss Mitigation Activities materially mitigated our paid losses for loans originated and serviced during this period and resulted in a significant reduction in our loss reserves. Following the financial crisis, mortgage underwriting and servicing have generally improved, and the amount of Loss Mitigation Activity required with respect to the claims on loans originated and serviced in more recent periods has significantly decreased. As a result, our future Loss Mitigation Activity is not expected to mitigate our paid losses to the same extent as it did in the years following the financial crisis.
In addition, underwe have incorporated provisions into our 2014 Master Policy for NIW after October 1, 2014,and 2020 Master Policy that generally provide rescission relief based on the number of months that borrowers remain current on their mortgage loans. As a consequence, our rights to conduct Loss Mitigation Activity generally are more limited than under these more recent Master Policies as compared to our prior master insurance policies. Radian Guaranty offers 12-month and 36-month rescission relief programs in accordance with the specified terms and conditions set forth in our 2014 Master Policy. Further, in December 2017, the FHFA and the GSEs proposed revised GSE Rescission Relief Principles to further clarify the circumstances under which mortgage insurers may rescind coverage, and required private mortgage insurers to implement these principles into their master policies for loans insured going forward. Our 2020 Master Policy incorporates these principles. Among other things, the 2020 Master Policy includes a new 60-month rescission relief program that provides that a loan may be eligible to qualify for rescission relief even if the loan failed to meet the conditions required to receive 36-month rescission relief. The 2020 Master Policy will apply to applications received on or after March 1, 2020. The reduction in the Loss Mitigation rights available under our 2014 Master Policy and 2020 Master Policy could result in higher losses than would have been the case under our Prior Master Policy.
Our Loss Mitigation Activities and claims paying practices have resulted in disputes with certain of our customers and in some cases, damaged our relationships with customers, resulting in a loss of business. While we have resolved manymost all of these disputes, a risk remains that our Loss Mitigation Activities or claims paying practices could continue to have a negative impact on our relationships with customers or potential customers. Further, disputes with our customers that are not resolved could result in additional arbitration or judicial proceedings, requiring significant legal expenses, beyond those we are currently facing.recently experienced. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”Proceedings” and Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. To the extent that past or future Loss Mitigation Activities or claims paying practices impact our customer relationships, our competitive position could be adversely affected, resulting in the potential loss of business and impacting our results of operations.
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
We use reinsurance as a capital and risk management tool. We have distributed risk through third-party quota share and excess-of-loss reinsurance arrangements, as well as through the capital markets using mortgage insurance-linked notes transactions.
The availability and cost of reinsurance are subject to market conditions beyond our control. For example, in 2020, the market volatility stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic temporarily disrupted the market for new insurance-linked notes transactions before the market once again reopened for issuances. No assurance can be given that reinsurance will remain available to us in amounts that we consider sufficient and at rates and upon terms that we consider acceptable. Accordingly, we may be forced to incur additional expenses for reinsurance or may not be able to obtain sufficient reinsurance on acceptable terms, which could cause us to increase the amount of risk we retain, negatively affect the returns we are able to achieve on the business we write and adversely affect our ability to write future business. Further, reinsurance does not relieve us of our direct liability to policyholders, therefore, if the reinsurer is unable or unwilling to meet its obligations to us, we remain liable to make claims payments to our policyholders. As a result, our reinsurance arrangements do not fully eliminate our obligation to pay claims, and we have assumed credit risk with respect to our inability to recover amounts due from reinsurers.
We use reinsurance to manage Radian Guaranty’s capital position under the PMIERs financial requirements. Among other benefits, our risk distribution transactions reduce our required capital, including by significantly reducing our Required Minimum Assets under the PMIERs. The initial and ongoing credit that we receive under the PMIERs financial requirements for these risk distribution transactions is subject to the periodic review of the GSEs and could be influenced by the ERCF, which significantly increases the capital requirements for the GSEs and provides the GSEs with a reduced amount of credit for their own credit risk transfer activities. See, “—Changes in the charters, business practices, or role of the GSEs in the U.S. housing market generally, could significantly impact our mortgage insurance businessbusinesses..
Our current business model is highly dependent on” In addition, if the GSEs asrevise the GSEs are the primary beneficiaries of most of our mortgage insurance policies. The GSEs’ federal charters generally require credit enhancement for low down payment mortgage loans (i.e., a loan amount that exceeds 80% of a home’s value) in order for such loans to be eligible for purchase by them. Lenders generally have used private mortgage insurance to satisfy this credit enhancement requirement. As a result, low down payment mortgages purchased by the GSEs generally are insured with private mortgage insurance. In order to be eligible to insure loans purchased by the GSEs, mortgage insurers such as Radian Guaranty must meet the GSEs’ eligibility requirements, or PMIERs.
The GSEs’ business practices may be impacted by their results of operations, by administrative policy decisions (such as a desire to increase the competitiveness of private capital executionsPMIERs in the secondary mortgage market) as well as by legislative or regulatory changes. Since September 2008,future to align with the GSEs have been operating under the conservatorship of the FHFA. With respect to loans purchased by the GSEs, changes in the business practices of the GSEs, which can be implemented by the GSEs acting independently or through their conservator, the FHFA,ERCF, such alignment could negatively impact our mortgage insurance business and financial performance, including changes to:
eligibility requirements for a mortgage insurer to become and remain an approved eligible insurer for the GSEs;
underwriting standards on mortgages they purchase, including as a result of the FHFA’s current focus on reducing the GSEs’ risk profile with respect to loans with multiple higher risk characteristics;
policies or requirements that may result ininclude a reduction in the number of mortgages they acquire;
credit that Radian Guaranty receives for reinsurance under the national conforming loan limit for mortgages they acquire;
the level of mortgage insurance required, including expanding the loans that are eligible for reduced insurance coverage;
the terms on which mortgage insurance coverage may be canceled before reaching the cancellation thresholds established by law;
the terms required to be included in master policies for the mortgage insurance policies they acquire, including limitations on our ability to mitigate losses on insured mortgages that are in default;
the amount of loan level price adjustments (based on risk) or guarantee fees (which may result in a higher cost to borrowers) that the GSEs charge on loans that require mortgage insurance; and
the degree of influence that the GSEs have over a mortgage lender’s selection of the mortgage insurer providing coverage.
The FHFA has called for the GSEs to transfer a meaningful portion of credit risk, known as a “credit risk transfer,” to the private sector. This mandate builds upon the goals set in each of the last four years for the GSEs to increase the role of private capital by experimenting with different forms of transactions and structures.We continue to participate in these credit risk transfer programs developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Additional information about these programs may be found in Item 1. Business, see “Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform” and “Mortgage Insurance—Mortgage Insurance Business Overview—Mortgage Insurance Products—Other Mortgage Insurance Products—GSE Credit Risk Transfer.”
It is difficult to predict what other types of credit risk transfer transactions and structures may be used in the future. If any of the credit risk transfer transactions and structures were to displace primary loan level or standard levels of mortgage insurance, the amount of insurance we write may be reduced,PMIERs, which could negatively impact our franchise value,strategic approach to risk management and risk distribution.
If we are unable to obtain sufficient reinsurance on acceptable terms or to collect amounts due from our reinsurers, or if we receive less PMIERs capital relief for our reinsurance transactions, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An extension in the period of time that a loan remains in our defaulted loan inventory may increase the severity of claims that we ultimately are required to pay.
High levels of defaults and corresponding delays in foreclosures could delay our receipt of claims, resulting in an increase in the period of time that a loan remains in our defaulted loan inventory, and as a result, the Claim Severity. Generally, foreclosure delays do not stop the accrual of interest or affect other expenses on a loan, and unless a loan is cured during such delay, once title to the property ultimately is obtained and a claim is filed, our paid claim amount may include additional interest and expenses, increasing the Claim Severity.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous federal and state regulatory agencies have instituted borrower relief programs, including mortgage payment forbearance and foreclosure and eviction moratoriums, with the objective of supporting borrowers through the economic hardship resulting from the pandemic and allowing borrowers to remain in their homes. In addition to the mortgage payment forbearance relief discussed above in “—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity,” the CARES Act also instituted temporary foreclosure and eviction moratoriums on GSE loans and GSE REO properties. The GSEs recently extended their moratoriums on single-family foreclosures and REO evictions until June 30, 2021. As a result of COVID-19-related relief programs, including the foreclosure moratorium, we anticipate that defaults related to the pandemic, if not cured, could remain in our defaulted loan inventory for a protracted period of time, resulting in higher levels of Claim Severity for those loans that ultimately result in a claim. Higher levels of Claim Severity would increase our incurred losses and could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. As
The length of time that our mortgage insurance policies remain in force could decline further and result in a decrease in our future revenues.
Most of our primary IIF consists of policies for which we expect to receive premiums in the future, typically through Monthly Premium Policies, and as a result, a significant portion of our earned premiums are derived from insurance that was written in prior years, often with premium rates that are greater than those prevailing in the market today. The length of time that this insurance remains in force, which we refer to as the Persistency Rate, is a significant driver of our future revenues, with a lower overall Persistency Rate generally reducing our future revenues.
Prevailing mortgage interest rates compared to the mortgage rates on our IIF affects the incentive for borrowers to refinance and therefore our Persistency Rate, with lower current interest rates making it more attractive for borrowers to refinance. The impact of any credit risk transfer products and transactions or other structures implemented by the GSEs is uncertain and hard to predict. For example,COVID-19 pandemic, including the government stimulus efforts in 2018 Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae announced the launch of pilot programs, IMAGIN and EPMI, respectively, as alternative ways for lenders to obtain credit enhancement and sell loans with LTVs greater than 80%response to the GSEs. These investor-paid mortgage insurance programs,pandemic, has resulted in a historically low interest rate environment leading to elevated levels of refinance activity. The increase in policy cancellations associated with this high level of refinance activity has reduced our Persistency Rate, and in turn, limited the growth of our IIF, which insurance is acquired directly by each GSE, have manyone of the same features as private mortgage insurance and represent an alternativeprimary drivers of future premiums that we expect to traditional private mortgage insurance products that are provided to individual lenders. Participants in IMAGIN and EPMI are not subject to compliance with the PMIERs which may create a competitive disadvantage for private mortgage insurers if these pilot programs are expanded. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform.”
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
Other factors affecting the length of time that our insurance remains in force include:
Since■applicable policies for mortgage insurance cancellation, along with the FHFA was appointed as conservatorcurrent value of the GSEs, there has beenhomes underlying the mortgages in our IIF;
■the credit policies of certain lenders, which may make it more difficult for homeowners to refinance loans; and
■economic conditions that can affect a wide range of legislative proposalsborrower’s decision to reformpay off a mortgage earlier than required, including the U.S. housing finance market, including proposals for GSE reform ranging from some that advocate nearly complete privatization and eliminationstrength of the role of the GSEs to others that supporthousing market, which impacts a system that combinesborrower’s prospects for selling their existing home and finding a federal role with private capital. In September 2019, the U.S. Department of the Treasurysuitable and HUD released the Treasury Plan and the HUD Plan to reform the housing finance market, and with respect to the Treasury Plan, to release the GSEs from conservatorship after certain conditions were met. Leadership at the FHFA and HUD have stated that they plan to use the Plans to guide the direction and activities of the GSEs and FHA. With the Plans serving as a roadmap, we expect HUD and FHFA will continue to take actions to shape the role of the FHA and GSEs in the housing finance market and to prepare the GSEs to exit conservatorship. In particular, the FHFA has stated a desire to reduce the GSEs’ exposure to loans with multiple higher risk characteristics in light of the fact that the GSEs currently maintain limited capital positions to support such risk. It is difficult to predict whether or how the Treasury Plan and HUD Plan may be implemented and what impact actions taken in furtherance of these plans could have on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform.”affordable new home.
The future structure of the residential housing finance system remains uncertain, including whether comprehensive housing reform legislation will be adopted and, if so, what form it may ultimately take. It is difficult to predict the impact of any changes on our business. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform.” Although we believe that traditional private mortgage insurance will continue to play an important role in any future housing finance structure, developments in the practices of the GSEs, including potentially new federal legislation that reduces the level of private mortgage insurance coverage used by the GSEs as credit enhancement,If these or even eliminates the requirement, may diminish the franchise value of our mortgage insurance business and materially and adversely affect our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
Aother factors cause a decrease in the volumelength of mortgage originationstime that our Recurring Premium Policies, for which we expect to receive premiums in the future, remain in force, our future revenues could result in fewer opportunities for us to write new mortgage insurance business.
The amount of new business we write depends, among other things, on a steady flow of low down payment mortgages that benefit from our mortgage insurance. The volume of low down payment mortgage originations isbe negatively impacted, by a number of factors, including:
restrictions on mortgage credit due to changes in lender underwriting standards, capital requirements affecting lenders, regulatory requirements such as the QM designation for mortgage loans, and the health of the private securitization market;
mortgage interest rates;
the health of the domestic economy generally, as well as specific conditions in regional and local economies;
housing affordability;
tax laws and policies and their impact on, among other things, deductions for mortgage insurance premiums, mortgage interest payments and real estate taxes;
demographic trends, including the rate of household formation;
the rate of home price appreciation;
government housing policy encouraging loans to first-time homebuyers; and
the practices of the GSEs, including the extent to which the guaranty fees, loan level price adjustments (based on risk), credit underwriting guidelines and other business terms provided by the GSEs affect the cost of mortgages and lenders’ willingness to extend credit for low down payment mortgages.
If the overall volume of new mortgage originations declines, we could experience a reduced opportunity to write new insurance business and likely will be subject to increased competition, which could negatively affectimpact our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
Our NIW and franchise value could decline if we lose business from significant customers.
Ourdelegated underwriting program may subject our mortgage insurance business depends on our relationships with our customers. Our customers place insurance with us directly on loans they originate and they also do business with us indirectly through purchases of loans that already haveto unanticipated claims.
In our mortgage insurance coverage. Our relationships withbusiness, we permit lenders to obtain mortgage insurance for residential mortgage loans originated and underwritten by them using Radian’s pre-established underwriting guidelines. Once we accept a lender into our customers may influence both the amount of business they conduct with us directly and also their willingness to continue to approve us asdelegated underwriting program, we generally insure a mortgage insurance provider forloan originated by that lender based on our expectation that the lender has followed our specified underwriting guidelines. Under this program, a lender could commit us to insure a material number of loans that they
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
purchase. The loss of business from significant customers could have an adverse effect onwith unacceptable risk profiles before we discover the amount of new business weproblem and are able to write, and consequently,terminate that lender’s delegated underwriting authority or pursue other rights that may be available to us, such as our franchise value.
During 2019, our top 10 mortgage insurance customers (measured by NIW) were responsible for 34.3% of our primary NIW, as comparedrights to 29.1% in 2018. If we were to lose a significant customer, it is unlikely that the loss could be completely offset by other customers in the near-term, if at all. Some of our lending customers may decide to write business only with a limited number of mortgage insurersrescind coverage or only with certain mortgage insurers, based on their views with respect to an insurer’s pricing, service levels, underwriting guidelines, loss mitigation practices, financial strength or other factors. Alternatively, certain other lending customers have chosen for risk management purposes to diversify the mortgage insurers with which they do business, which may negatively affect our level of NIW and market share with those customers. Given that many of our customers currently give us a significant portion of their total mortgage insurance business, it is possible that further diversification could have a negative impact on our NIW if we are unable to mitigate the market share loss through new customers or increases in business with other customers. Further, we actively engage with our customers to ensure that we are receiving an appropriate mix of business from such customers at acceptable projected returns, and depending on the circumstances, we could take action with respect to customers (e.g., limiting the type of business we accept from them or instituting pricing changes that impact them) that could result in customers reducing the amount of business they do with us or deciding not to do business with us altogether. Any significant loss in our market share could negatively impact our mortgage insurance franchise, results of operations and financial condition.deny claims.
Our mortgage insurance business faces intense competition.
The U.S. mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive. Our competitors primarily include other private mortgage insurers and governmental agencies, principally the FHA and VA.
We currently compete with other private mortgage insurers that are eligible to write business for the GSEs primarily on the basis of price, underwriting guidelines, overall service, customer relationships, perceived financial strength (including comparative credit ratings) and reputation. Overall service competition is based on, among other things, effective and timely delivery of products, responsiveness to compliance audits, timeliness of claims payments, customer service, timely and accurate servicing of policies, training, loss mitigation efforts and management and field service expertise. We also believe that our service includes our ability to offer services to customers through our ServicesReal Estate business that are relevant to our mortgage insurance customers and complement our mortgage insurance products. For more information about our competitive environment, including pricing competition, see “Item 1. Business—Mortgage Insurance—Competition.”
In developing our pricing and origination strategies, we monitor various competitive and economic factors while seeking to enhance the long-term value of our portfolio by balancing credit risk, profitability and volume and capital considerations. Pricing strategies continue to evolve in the mortgage insurance industry and mortgage insurers generally have migrated to offering various pricing methodologies with differing degrees of risk-based granularity. The shift away from a predominantly rate-card-based pricing model and the increase in “black box” pricing frameworks provides a more dynamic pricing environment that has led to an increase in the frequency ofallows for more frequent pricing changes throughout the mortgage insurance industrythat can be implemented quickly and has contributed to a reduction in pricing transparency. As a result, we may not be aware of rate changes in the industry until we observe that our volume of NIW has changed. Further, among other factors, this shift into risk-based, granular pricing methodologies, as well astogether with the development of enhanced digital technologies for delivering and receiving price quotes, has led to an increasing number of customers making their choice of mortgage insurance providers based on the lowest price available for any particular loan, without consideration of other factors. The increased use of algorithms, artificial intelligence and data and analytics in the mortgage insurance industry may also lead to additional regulatory scrutiny related to other matters such as discrimination in pricing and underwriting, data privacy and access to insurance. Finally, industry pricing practices have also recently included an increased use of customized rate plans for certain customers, pursuant to which rates may be awarded to customers for only a limited periods of time, resulting in greater volatility in overall NIW as customers come onto and off of these customized rate cards.
The evolution of pricing changes in the mortgage insurance industry has heightened overall competition and, despite temporary pricing increases implemented throughout the industry in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, has generally resulted in reduced pricing for mortgage insurance throughout the industry, including our mortgage insurance.pricing. This reduction in our premium rates is expected to decrease the premium yield of our insured portfolio over time as older vintage insured loans with higher premium rates run-off and are replaced with insured loans with lower premium rates. There can be no assurance that pricing competition will not intensify further, which could result in a decrease in our projected returns. Despite our pricing actions, we may experience returns below our targeted returns.
Overall, our approach to pricing is customer-centric and flexible, as we offer a spectrum of risk-based pricing solutions for our customers that are designed to be balanced with our objectives for managing our volume of NIW and the risk/return profile of our insured portfolio. Although we believe we are well-positioned to compete effectively, our pricing strategy may not be successful. Despite our pricing actions, we may experience returns below our targeted returnssuccessful and we may lose business to other competitors. There can be no assurance that pricing competition will not intensify further, which could result in a decrease in our projected returns.
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
Certain of our private mortgage insurance competitors are subsidiaries of larger corporations, may have access to greater amounts of capital and financial resources than we do at a lower cost of capital (including off-shore reinsurance vehicles) and currently have better financial strength ratings than we have. As a result, they may be better positioned to compete outside of traditional mortgage insurance, including in the private label securitization market or if the GSEs expand their use of, or pursue
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
alternative forms of, credit enhancement outside of private mortgage insurance in its traditional form. In addition, because of tax advantages associated with being off-shore, which may become more pronounced if tax laws change in the future, certain of our competitors have been able to reinsure to their offshore affiliates and achieve higher after-tax rates of return on the NIW they write compared to mortgage insurers such as Radian Guaranty that do not have access to offshore affiliates, which could allow these off-shore competitors to leverage reduced pricing to gain market share, while continuing to achieve acceptable returns on NIW.
We also compete with governmental entities, such as the FHA and VA, primarily on the basis of loan limits, pricing, credit guidelines, terms of our insurance policies and loss mitigation practices. These governmental entities typically do not have the same capital requirements or business objectives that we and other private mortgage insurance companies have, and therefore, may have greater financial flexibility in their pricing guidelines and capacity that could put us at a competitive disadvantage. If these entities lower their pricing or alter the terms and conditions of their mortgage insurance or other credit enhancement products in furtherance of political, social or other goals rather than a profit motive, we may be unable to compete in that market effectively, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Beginning in 2008,Since the FHA, which historically had not been a significant competitor, substantially increasedfinancial crisis, the private mortgage insurance industry has improved its share of the mortgage insuranceinsurable, low down-payment market, includingprimarily by insuring a number of loans that would meet our current underwriting guidelines, sometimes at a lower monthly cost torecapturing market share from the borrower than a loan that carries our mortgage insurance. The FHA, may continuewhich had increased its share dramatically during and immediately following the crisis. Despite this, the FHA continues to maintain a significant market position and could increase its market position. Factors that could cause the FHA to maintain or enhance its competitive position include:
governmental■the Biden Administration’s housing policy, includingwhich is focused on increasing access to affordable housing for low and moderate income borrowers and which HUD and the FHFA may seek to implement through decreases in the pricing of FHA insurance or changes in the terms of FHA insurance such as the current life-of-loan coverage requirement;
a coordinated effort by■the focused efforts of the current, Trump-appointed leadership team at the FHFA to prepare the GSEs to exit conservatorship by restricting the GSEs’ credit profiles and FHA to increaseincreasing their capital levels, which could have the effect of increasing the FHA’s share of certain high LTV loans currently purchased by the GSEs;
■changes to the legal requirements (e.g., compliance certifications) for conducting business with the FHA, including those recentlychanges that have been implemented, to reduce the perceived risk that lenders will be subject to liability in connection with loans insured by the FHA;
■changes to the CFPB definition of QM that resultswere recently adopted by the CFPB and that result in a broader QM Safe Harbor definition of qualified mortgage for FHA eligible loans than GSE eligible loans;
■capital requirements imposed on the private mortgage insurance industry;
■the tightening by private mortgage insurers of underwriting guidelines based on credit risk concerns;
■business changes by the GSEs, including underwriting changes, a reduction in loan limits or increases in the loan level price adjustments (based on risk) charged by the GSEs on loans that require mortgage insurance and changes in the amount of guarantee fees for the loans that they acquire (which may result in higher cost to borrowers); and
■the perceived operational ease of using FHA insurance compared to the products of private mortgage insurers.
OtherSee “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal Regulation—Housing Finance Reform and the GSEs’ Business Practices” for further discussion of factors that could impact the FHA’s competitive position relative to private mortgage insurers may seekinsurance, including: (i) the FHFA’s current focus on preparing the GSEs to competeexit conservatorship; (ii) the likely focus of the Biden Administration and HUD and FHA on increasing mortgage accessibility and affordability for market share fromlow- and moderate-income borrowers; and (iii) the recent changes to the QM definition that could make execution through the FHA or other mortgage insurers by reducing pricing, which could, in turn, improve their competitive position in the industry and negatively impact our level of NIW.more attractive for certain high-LTV loans.
We have also faced increasing competition from the VA. Based on publicly available information, the VA accounted for 26% of the insurable mortgage market in 2019. We believe that the VA’s market share has generally been increasing because the VA offers 100% LTV loans and charges a one-time funding fee that can be included in the loan amount with no additional monthly expense, and because of an increase in the number of borrowers that are eligible for the VA’s program.
In addition, as market conditions change, alternatives to private mortgage insurance may become more prevalent, which could reduce the demand for private mortgage insurance in its traditional form, including:
■structures, such as the IMAGIN and EPMI pilot programs launched in 2018 by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, respectively, that are commonly referred to as “investor paid mortgage insurance” in which affiliates of traditional mortgage insurers directly insure the GSEs against loss;Mae;
■lenders and other investors holding mortgages in their portfolio and self-insuring;
■lenders using pass-through vehicles that take on the risk of loss for loans ultimately sold to the GSEs;
■structured risk transfer transactions in the capital markets;
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
■risk sharing, risk transfer or using other risk mitigation techniques in conjunction with reduced levels of private mortgage insurance coverage;
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
lenders originating mortgages using “piggyback” structures to avoid private mortgage insurance, such as a first-lien mortgage with an 80% LTV and a second mortgage with a 10%, 15% or 20% LTV; and
■other potential forms of credit enhancement that do not involve private mortgage insurance.
See “—Changes in the charters, business practices, or role of the GSEs in the U.S. housing market generally, could significantly impact our mortgage insurance businessbusinesses..”
The competitive environment is extremely challenging given the multitude of factors discussed above. This environment, as well as potential further changes to this evolving environment, could negatively impact our franchise value, business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
Our NIW and franchise value could decline if we lose business from significant customers.
Our mortgage insurance business depends on our relationships with our customers. Our customers place insurance with us directly on loans they originate and they also do business with us indirectly through purchases of loans that already have our mortgage insurance coverage. Our relationships with our customers may influence both the amount of business they conduct with us directly and their willingness to continue to approve us as a mortgage insurance provider for loans that they purchase. The loss of business from significant customers could have an adverse effect on the amount of new business we are able to write, and consequently, our franchise value.
If we were to lose a significant customer, it is unlikely that the loss could be completely offset by other customers in the near-term, if at all. Some of our lending customers may decide to write business only with a limited number of mortgage insurers or only with certain mortgage insurers, based on their views with respect to an insurer’s information security and other compliance programs, pricing levels and pricing delivery methods, service levels, underwriting guidelines, loss mitigation practices, financial strength or other factors. Alternatively, certain other lending customers have chosen for risk management purposes to diversify the mortgage insurers with which they do business, which may negatively affect our level of NIW and market share with those customers. Given that many of our customers currently give us a significant portion of their total mortgage insurance business, it is possible that further diversification could have a negative impact on our NIW if we are unable to mitigate the market share loss through new customers or increases in business with other customers. Further, we actively engage with our customers to ensure that we are receiving an appropriate mix of business from such customers at acceptable projected returns, and depending on the circumstances, we could take action with respect to customers (e.g., limiting the type of business we accept from them or instituting pricing changes that impact them) that could result in customers reducing the amount of business they do with us or deciding not to do business with us altogether. Finally, although we seek to develop our product offerings and strategies to be complementary to our customers, we currently offer and may offer in the future, products that could be viewed as competitive to products offered by certain of our customers, which could influence a customer’s decision as to whether to do business with us. Any significant loss in our market share could negatively impact our mortgage insurance franchise, results of operations and financial condition.
The current financial strength ratings assigned to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries could weaken our competitive position and potential downgrades by rating agencies to these ratings and the ratings assigned to Radian Group could adversely affect the Company.
Radian Guaranty has been assigned a rating of Baa1 by Moody’s, a rating of BBB+ by S&P and a rating of A- by Fitch. While Radian Guaranty’s financial strength ratings currently are investment grade, certain of these ratings are below the ratings assigned to certain other private mortgage insurers. We do not believe our ratings have had a material adverse effect on our relationships with existing customers. However, if financial strength ratings become a more prominent consideration for lenders, we may be competitively disadvantaged by customers choosing to do business with private mortgage insurers that have higher financial strength ratings. In addition, while the current PMIERs do not include a specific ratings requirement with respect to eligibility, if this were to change in the future, we may become subject to a ratings requirement in order to retain our eligibility status under the PMIERs. The recently finalized ERCF generally provides more capital credit for transactions with higher rated counterparties, which if translated to the PMIERS in the future, could potentially become a competitive disadvantage for us.
The GSEs currently consider financial strength ratings, among other items, to determine the amount of collateral that an insurer must post when participating in the credit risk transfer transactions currently being conducted by the GSEs. As a result, the returns that we are able to achieve when participating in these transactions are dependent, in part, on our financial strength ratings. We currently use Radian Reinsurance to participate in the GSEs’ credit risk transfer transactions. Radian Reinsurance has been assigned a rating of BBB+ by S&P. Market participants with higher ratings than us are assigned lower collateral requirements by the GSEs for these transactions and generally have a lower cost of capital, which may give them a competitive advantage, including the ability to price more aggressively for these transactions.
We believe that financial strength ratings remain a significant consideration for participants seeking to secure credit enhancement in the non-GSE mortgage market, which includes most non-QM loans. While this market has remained limited since the financial crisis and has further contracted as a result of COVID-19, we view this market as an area of potential long-term future growth, and our ability to successfully participate in this market could depend on our ability to secure higher ratings
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
for our mortgage insurance subsidiaries. In addition, if legislative or regulatory changes were to alter the current state of the housing finance industry such that the GSEs no longer operate in their current capacity, we may be forced to compete in a new marketplace in which financial strength ratings may play a greater role.
The rating agencies continually review the financial strength ratings assigned to Radian Group and its mortgage insurance subsidiaries, and the ratings are subject to change. The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on our financial results and condition, could cause one or more of the rating agencies to downgrade the ratings assigned to Radian Group and its mortgage insurance subsidiaries. Currently, S&P and Fitch have assigned a negative outlook for the financial strength ratings assigned to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries and Radian Group senior debt. Downgrades to the ratings of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries and Radian Group could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity, access to capital markets and competitive position. If we are unable to compete effectively in the current or any future markets as a result of the financial strength ratings assigned to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries, the franchise value and future prospects for our mortgage insurance business could be negatively affected.
Our business depends, in part, on effective and reliable loan servicing.
We depend on third-party servicing of the loans that we insure. Dependable servicing is necessary for timely billing and premium payments to us and effective loss mitigation opportunities for delinquent or near-delinquent loans. Changes in the servicing industry, challenging economic and market conditions or periods of economic stress and high mortgage defaults could negatively affect the ability of servicers to effectively service the loans that we insure. Further, servicersServicers are required to comply with a multitude of legal and regulatory requirements, procedures and standards for servicing residential mortgages such as the CFPB’s mortgage servicing rules. While these requirements are intended to ensure a high level of servicing performance, they also impose a high cost of compliance on servicers that may impact their financial condition and their operating effectiveness. The COVID-19 pandemic has placed additional burdens on many servicers. Challenging economic and market conditions or periods of economic stress and high mortgage defaults such as currently exist make it more difficult for servicers to effectively service the loans that we insure. Further, the various servicing-related requirements imposed by the CARES Act, the GSEs, the FHA and other federal and state governmental and regulatory bodies and agencies to address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortgage borrowers heighten the burdens placed on servicers in the current environment. Servicer performance may be further stressed due to the short timeframe over which these events have occurred, which has resulted in a high volume of COVID-19 related servicing demands, such as administering forbearance requests for borrowers, generally occurring and moving forward on similar timeframes.
Information with respect to the mortgage loans we insure is based in large part on information reported to us by third parties, including the servicers and originators of the mortgage loans, and information presented may be subject to lapses or inaccuracies in reporting from such third parties. In many cases, we may not be aware that information reported to us is incorrect until such time as a claim is made against us under the relevant insurance policy. We do not receive monthly information from servicers for single premium policies, and may not be aware that the mortgage loans insured by such policies have been repaid. We periodically attempt to determine if coverage is still in force on such policies by asking the last servicer of record or through the periodic reconciliation of loan information with certain servicers. It may be possible that our reports continue to reflect, as active, policies on mortgage loans that have been repaid.
In the event a borrower fails to make mortgage payments, including as the result of a forbearance program, servicers often are required to advance such amounts, including principal and interest on the mortgage and amounts to cover taxes and insurance, for a period of time, including with respect to loans purchased by the GSEs. These required “advances” may increase the financial strain on servicers, which could negatively impact their financial condition or otherwise disrupt their operations; although currently, in response to the pandemic, the FHFA and GSEs have implemented a four-month limit on servicer advance obligations for loans in forbearance which has reduced this financial burden. If we experience a disruption in the servicing of mortgage loans covered by our insurance policies or a failure by servicers to appropriately report the status of a loan, including whether the loan is subject to a COVID-19 related forbearance program, this, in turn, could impact the amount of assets Radian Guaranty is required to hold under the PMIERs or ultimately contribute to a rise in defaults and/or claims among those loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
An extension inUnder the period of time that a loan remains in our defaulted loan inventory may increase the severity of claims that we ultimately are required to pay.
High levels of defaults and corresponding delays in foreclosures could delay our receipt of claims, resulting in an increase in the period of time that a loan remains in our defaulted loan inventory, and as a result, the Claim Severity. Following the financial crisis, the average time that it took for us to receive a claim increased. This was, in part, due to loss mitigation protocols that were established by servicers and also to a significant backlog of foreclosure proceedings in many states, and especially in those states that impose a judicial process for foreclosures. Generally, foreclosure delays do not stop the accrual of interest or affect other expenses on a loan, and unless a loan is cured during such delay, once title to the property ultimately is obtained and a claim is filed, our paid claim amount may include additional interest and expenses, increasing the Claim Severity. While foreclosure timelines have improved in recent years, a portionterms of our portfolio originated in the years prior to2014 Master Policy and including 2008 consists of severely delinquent loans. Further, another period of significant economic stress and a high level of defaults could once again delay claims and result in higher levels of Claim Severity. Higher levels of Claim Severity would increase our incurred losses and could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Our success depends on our ability to assess and manage our underwriting risks; the premiums we charge may not be adequate to compensate us for our liability for losses and the amount of capital we are required to hold against our insured risks. We expect to incur future provisions for losses beyond what we have reserved for in our financial statements.
The estimates and expectations we use to establish premium rates are based on assumptions made at the time our insurance is written.Our2020 Master Policy, mortgage insurance premiums are based on, among other items, the amount of capital we arenot required to hold againstbe paid following an event of default. However, if a defaulted loan then cures, all mortgage insurance premiums must be brought current for our insured risks and our estimates of the long-term risk of claims on insured loans. Our premium rates are established based on performance models that consider a broad range of borrower, loan and property characteristics, as well as capital requirements and market and economic conditions. Our assumptions may ultimately prove to be inaccurate.
If the risk underlying a mortgage loan we have insured develops more adversely than we anticipated, we generally cannot increase the premium rates on this in-force business, or cancel coverage or elect not to renewinsurance coverage to mitigatecontinue, including all premiums that were not paid during the effectsperiod following the event of such adverse developments. Similarly, we cannot adjust ourdefault and through the date of cure. Because premiums must be brought current upon a cure, mortgage servicers typically continue to pay mortgage insurance premiums while loans remain in default, understanding that Radian Guaranty will refund these premiums if the amountloans fail to cure and ultimately go to claim. As part of capitalthe National Emergency Guidelines, the GSEs temporarily amended the PMIERs to require that mortgage insurers notify the GSEs before coverage is canceled in specific circumstances, and to give the GSEs the opportunity to pay the premium on behalf of the servicer to keep coverage in force. If we are requiredfail to hold against our insured risks increases from the amount we were required to hold at the time a policy was written. As a result, if we are unable to compensate for or offset the increased capital requirements in other ways, the returns on our business may be lower than we assumed or expected. Ourreceive mortgage insurance premiums earned and the associated investment income on those premiums may ultimately prove to be inadequate to compensate for the losses that we may incur and may not provide an adequate return on increased capital that may be required. As a result, our results of operations and financial conditionfollowing mortgage defaults, Radian Guaranty’s cash flow could be negatively impacted.
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
Additionally, in accordance with industry practice, we do not establish reserves in our mortgage insurance business until we are notified thatmaterially reduced, potentially requiring Radian Guaranty to liquidate investments at a borrower has failedloss to make at least two monthly payments when due. Because our mortgage insurance reserving does not account for the impact of future losses that we expect to incur with respect to performing (non-defaulted) loans, our obligation for ultimate losses that we expect to incur at any period end is not reflected in our financial statements, except to the extent that a premium deficiency exists. As a result, our losses can be more severe in periods of high defaults given that we generally are not permitted to establish reserves in anticipation of such defaults.
If the estimates we use in establishing loss reserves are incorrect, we may be required to take unexpected charges to income, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We establish loss reserves in our mortgage insurance business to provide for the estimated cost ofpay future claims on defaulted loans. Setting our loss reserves requires significant judgment by management with respect to the likelihood, magnitude and timing of each potential loss, including an estimate of the impact of our Loss Mitigation Activities with respect to defaulted loans. The models, assumptions and estimates we use to establish loss reserves may not prove to be accurate, especially in the event of an extended economic downturn or a period of extreme market volatility and uncertainty. Because of this, claims paid may be substantially different than our loss reserves and these reserves may be insufficient to satisfy the full amount of claims that we ultimately have to pay. Changes to our estimates could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
A portion of the defaulted loans in our portfolio originated in the years prior to and including 2008 have been in default for an extended period of time. While these loans are generally assigned a higher loss reserve based on our belief that they are more likely to result in a claim, we also assume, based on historical trends, that a significant portion of these loans will cure or otherwise not result in a claim. Given the significant period of time that these loans have been in default, it is possible that the ultimate cure rate for these defaulted loans will be less than our current estimates of Cures for this inventory of defaults.
If our estimates are inadequate, we may be required to increase our reserves, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our delegated underwriting program may subject our mortgage insurance business to unanticipated claims.
In our mortgage insurance business, we permit lenders to obtain mortgage insurance for residential mortgage loans originated and underwritten by them using Radian’s pre-established underwriting guidelines. Once we accept a lender into our delegated underwriting program, we generally insure a mortgage loan originated by that lender based on our expectation that the lender has followed our specified underwriting guidelines in accordance with the endorsement. Under this program, a lender could commitrequiring us to insure a material number of loans with unacceptable risk profiles before we discover the problem and terminate that lender’s delegated underwriting authority or pursue other rights that may be available to us, such asalter our rights to rescind coverage or deny claims.investment strategy.
We face risks associated with our contract underwriting business.
We provide third-party contract underwriting services for our customers. We provide these customers with limited indemnification rights with respect to those loans that we simultaneously underwrite for both secondary market compliance and for potential mortgage insurance eligibility. In addition, in certain circumstances,customers. Generally, we may also offer limited indemnification when we underwrite a loan only for secondary market compliance.to our contract underwriting customers. In addition to indemnification, we typically have limited loss mitigation
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
defenses available to us for loans that we have underwritten through our contract underwriting services. As a consequence, our results of operations could be negatively impacted if we are required to indemnify our customers for material underwriting errors in our contract underwriting services.
Reinsurance may not be available, affordable or adequateA decrease in the volume of mortgage originations could result in fewer opportunities for us to protect us against losses.write new mortgage insurance business and conduct our Real Estate business.
In ourThe amount of new mortgage insurance business we use reinsurancewrite and real estate transactions we support depends, among other things, on a steady flow of low down payment mortgages that benefit from our mortgage insurance and the volume of real estate transactions that require our services or products. The volume of mortgage originations is impacted by a number of factors, including:
■restrictions on mortgage credit due to changes in lender underwriting standards, capital requirements affecting lenders, regulatory requirements such as a capitalthe QM designation for mortgage loans (as further discussed below), and risk management tool. We have distributed risk through third-party quota share and excess-of-loss reinsurance arrangements,the health of the private securitization market;
■mortgage interest rates;
■the health of the domestic economy generally, as well as throughspecific conditions in regional and local economies;
■housing supply and affordability;
■tax laws and policies and their impact on, among other things, deductions for mortgage insurance premiums, mortgage interest payments and real estate taxes;
■demographic trends, including the capital markets using mortgage insurance-linked notes transactions.rate of household formation;
The availability■the rate of home price appreciation;
■government housing policy encouraging loans to first-time homebuyers; and
■the practices of the GSEs, including the extent to which the guaranty fees, loan level price adjustments, credit underwriting guidelines and other business terms provided by the GSEs affect the cost of reinsurancemortgages and lenders’ willingness to extend credit for low down payment mortgages.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, mortgage lenders must make a reasonable and good faith determination that, at the time the loan is consummated, the consumer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan (the “Ability to Repay Rule”). The Dodd-Frank Act provides that a creditor may presume that a borrower will be able to repay a loan if the loan has certain low-risk characteristics that meet the definition of a qualified mortgage (“QM Rule”). This QM presumption is generally rebuttable, however, loans that are deemed to have the lowest risk profiles are granted a safe harbor from liability (“QM Safe Harbor”) related to the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.
In implementing the QM Rule, the CFPB established rigorous underwriting and product feature requirements for the loans to be deemed qualified mortgages (“Current QM Definition”), including that the borrower does not exceed a 43% debt-to-income ratio after giving effect to the loan. As part of the Current QM Definition, the CFPB also created a special exemption for the GSEs, which is generally referred to as the “QM Patch,” that allows any loan that meets the GSE underwriting and product feature requirements to be deemed to be a qualified mortgage, or QM, regardless of whether the loan exceeds the 43% debt-to-income ratio. The QM Patch expires on July 1, 2021.
In December 2020, the CFPB issued a new QM definition (“New QM Definition”) that replaces the underwriting focused approach of the Current QM Definition, including the 43% debt-to-income ratio limitation, with a new pricing-based approach to QM. Under the New QM Definition, certain underwriting considerations are retained, but QM status generally is achieved if the loan is priced at no greater than 2.25% above the Average Prime Offer Rate (“APOR”). Loans priced at or less than 1.5% above APOR are subject to market conditions beyond our control. No assurance can be giventhe QM Safe Harbor, while all other QM loans would receive the general rebuttable presumption that reinsurance will remain available to us in amounts that we consider sufficient and at rates that we consider acceptable. Accordingly, we may be forced to incur additional expenses for reinsurance or may not be able to obtain sufficient reinsurance on acceptable terms, which could cause us to increase the amount of risk we retain, negatively affectloans met the returns we are able to achieve on the business we write and adversely affect our ability to write future business. Further, reinsurance doesrepay standard. The New QM Definition is intended to replace the current QM Patch, which if implemented, is expected to effectively reduce the number of loans that would be designated QM compared to those receiving QM designation under the QM Patch, although not relieve usmaterially. The New QM Definition is effective March 1, 2021 and has a mandatory compliance deadline of our direct liabilityJuly 1, 2021, at which time it is intended to policyholders, therefore,replace the QM Patch. However, on February 23, 2021, the CFPB announced that it expects to issue a proposed rule to delay the July 1, 2021 mandatory compliance deadline for the New QM Definition and that if this proposed rule is finalized, then: (1) the reinsurer is unableQM Patch would remain in place until the earlier of the delayed mandatory compliance date or unwillingthe date that the GSEs exit conservatorship; and (2) between the March 1, 2021 effective date of the New QM Definition and the delayed mandatory compliance date, market participants could satisfy the QM Rule under either the Current QM Definition or the New QM Definition. In December 2020, the CFPB also created a new QM category (“Seasoned QM”) for first-lien, fixed-rate loans that meet certain performance requirements over a 36-month seasoning period and are held in the lender’s portfolio until the end of the seasoning period. As part of its February 23, 2021 announcement, the CFPB stated that it was evaluating whether to meet its obligationsinitiate a new rule to us, we remain liablereconsider the Seasoned QM definition.
The Dodd-Frank Act also granted the FHA, VA and the USDA flexibility to make claims payments to our policyholders. As a result, our reinsurance arrangements do not fully eliminate
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
our obligationTo date, the housing and real estate markets have been able to pay claims,withstand the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, with markets generally supported by low interest rates, favorable demographics supporting growth in the population of first-time homebuyers and we have assumed credit riska relatively constrained supply of homes available for sale. However, the ongoing economic impact of the pandemic remains uncertain and unfavorable developments with respect to unemployment, consumer confidence and underwriting standards, as well as the implementation of public and private sector initiatives to reduce the transmission of COVID-19, such as the continued imposition of restrictions on business activities, could affect the number of new mortgages available for us to insure and real estate transactions available for our inabilityservices.
If the overall volume of new mortgage originations declines, we would likely be subject to recoverincreased competition and we could experience a reduced opportunity to write new insurance business and provide our real estate services, which could negatively affect our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
We face risks associated with our Real Estate business.
Our Real Estate business exposes us to certain risks that may negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition, including, among others, the following:
■Our Real Estate business is driven primarily by digital products and services, including software as a service solutions and proprietary technology platforms that depend on our ability to develop, launch and implement new and innovative technologies and digital solutions and expose us to additional risks and uncertainties that include, without limitation, challenges associated with new and rapidly evolving technologies and business environments, customer acceptance of our digital product and service offerings, the costs associated with the development and launch of these technologies and products, our failure to successfully integrate new technologies into our existing systems and the risk that our digital product and services offerings fail to operate as expected or planned or that expose us to additional cybersecurity or third party risks;
■Our Real Estate revenue is dependent on a limited number of large customers that represent a significant proportion of our Real Estate total revenues. The loss or reduction of business from one or more of these significant customers could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. In addition, Radian Guaranty does business with many of these significant customers. In the event of a dispute between a significant customer and either of our business segments, the overall customer relationship for Radian could be negatively impacted;
■Due to the transactional nature of our business, our Real Estate segment revenues are subject to fluctuation from period to period and are difficult to predict;
■The services we offer through our Real Estate business are influenced by the level of overall activity in the mortgage, real estate and mortgage finance markets generally. If real estate transaction volumes decline, we could experience less demand for our real estate and title services;
■Red Bell is a licensed real estate brokerage and provides real estate brokerage services in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. As a licensed real estate brokerage, Red Bell receives residential real estate information from various multiple listing services (“MLS”). Red Bell receives this information, which it uses in its business to broker real estate transactions and provide valuation products and services, pursuant to the terms of agreements with the MLS providers. If these agreements were to terminate or Red Bell otherwise were to lose access to this information, it could negatively impact Red Bell’s ability to conduct its business and our future real estate strategies; and
■By their nature, title claims are often complex, vary greatly in dollar amounts dueand are affected by economic and market conditions and the legal environment existing at the time of settlement of the claims. Estimating future title loss payments is difficult because of the complex nature of title claims, the long periods of time over which claims are paid, significantly varying dollar amounts of individual claims and other factors. From time to time, we could experience large losses or an overall worsening of our loss payment experience in regard to the frequency or severity of claims that require us to record additional charges to our claims loss reserve. These loss events are unpredictable and could adversely affect the financial performance of our Real Estate business.
Risks Related to the Economic Environment
The credit performance of our mortgage insurance portfolio is impacted by macroeconomic conditions and specific events that affect the ability of borrowers to pay their mortgages.
As a seller of mortgage credit protection, our results are subject to macroeconomic conditions and specific events that impact the housing finance and real estate markets, including events that impact mortgage originations and the credit performance of our mortgage insurance portfolio. Many of these conditions are beyond our control, including housing prices, unemployment levels, interest rate changes, the availability of credit and other factors that may be derived from reinsurers. Ifnational and
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
regional economic conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic has created periods of significant economic disruption, high unemployment, volatility and disruption in financial markets, and required adjustments in the housing finance system and real estate markets. In general, challenging economic conditions such as we are currently experiencing increase the likelihood that borrowers will be unable to obtain sufficient reinsurancesatisfy their mortgage obligations. A deteriorating economy can adversely affect housing values, which in turn can influence the willingness of borrowers to continue to make mortgage payments despite having the financial resources to do so.
Mortgage defaults can occur due to a variety of specific events affecting borrowers, including death or illness, divorce or other family problems, unemployment, among other events. In addition, factors impacting regional economic conditions, acts of terrorism, war or other severe conflicts, event-specific economic depressions, severe weather events and natural disasters which may be exacerbated in severity or frequency due to climate change and other catastrophic events such as the COVID-19 pandemic could result in increased defaults due to the impact of such events on acceptable termsthe ability of borrowers to satisfy their mortgage obligations and the value of affected homes. Further, as discussed above under “—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity,” mortgage forbearance programs available as a result of COVID-19 may continue to result in an elevated level of new defaults. Due to these factors, among others, we expect the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have a negative impact on the credit performance of our mortgage insurance portfolio, including potential further increases in defaults and losses. The pandemic’s effect on the number of new defaults and level of losses will depend, among other factors, on the pandemic’s scope, severity and duration, its resulting impact on the economy including unemployment and housing prices, and the ability of current and any future government programs to provide economic and individual relief, all of which will likely have an impact on borrowers’ ability to remain current on their mortgage payments, and if they have entered into forbearance or other relief programs, to collect amountsresume making payments upon the expiration of the forbearance period.
Unfavorable macroeconomic developments, including the current ongoing economic uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the other factors cited above, may continue to have a material negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to manage risks in our investment portfolio.
Our investment portfolio is an important source of revenue and is our primary source of claims paying resources. Although our investment portfolio consists primarily of highly-rated fixed income investments, our investment strategy is affected by general economic conditions, which may adversely affect the markets for credit and interest-rate-sensitive securities, including the extent and timing of investor participation in these markets, the level and volatility of interest rates and credit spreads and, consequently, the value of our fixed income securities, and as such, we may not achieve our investment objectives. Volatility or lack of liquidity in the markets in which we invest has at times reduced the market value of some of our investments, including most recently as a result of the disruption in the financial markets due fromto the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, when the credit environment experiences deterioration, such as occurred at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of impairments of our reinsurers,investments could increase. LIBOR, U.S. Treasury yields and credit spreads have declined, which could further lower investment yields. If the financial markets experience additional disruption and volatility, it could have a material adverse effect on our business,liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
Interest rates and investment yields on our investments continue to be low compared to historical averages, which has reduced the investment yield on our investment portfolio. For the significant portion of our investment portfolio held by our insurance subsidiaries, to receive favorable treatment under insurance regulatory requirements and full credit as Available Assets under the PMIERs, we generally are limited to investing in investment grade fixed income investments that are unlikely to increase our overall investment yields. Because we depend on our investments as a source of revenue, a prolonged period of lower than expected investment yields would have an adverse impact on our revenues and could adversely affect our results of operations. Further, future updates to the Model Act or PMIERs could restrict our investment choices, which could negatively impact our investment strategy.
In addition, we structure our investment portfolio to satisfy our expected liabilities, including claim payments in our mortgage insurance business. If we underestimate our future claim payments or other liabilities or improperly structure our investments to meet these liabilities, we could have unexpected losses resulting from the forced liquidation of investments before their maturity, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our reported earnings are subject to fluctuations based on changes in our trading securities, equity securities and short-term investments that require us to adjust their fair market value.
We have significant holdings of trading securities, equity securities and short-term investments that we carry at fair value. Because the changes in fair value of these financial instruments are reflected on our statements of operations each period, they affect our reported earnings and can create earnings volatility. Among other factors, interest rate changes, market volatility and declines in the value of underlying collateral will impact the value of our investments, potentially resulting in unrealized losses that could negatively impact our results of operations.
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
Uncertainty relating to the potential discontinuance of LIBOR after 2021 may adversely affect us.
In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that after 2021, it would no longer compel banks to submit rate quotations required to calculate LIBOR. As a result, it is uncertain whether LIBOR will continue to be quoted after 2021. Efforts are underway to identify and transition to a set of alternative reference rates. The set of alternative rates includes the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing in 2018. In addition, central banks in several other jurisdictions have also announced plans for alternative reference rates for other currencies. There is considerable uncertainty as to how the financial services industry will address the expected discontinuance of LIBOR in financial instruments that are indexed to LIBOR. Financial instruments indexed to LIBOR could experience disparate outcomes based on their contractual terms, ability to amend those terms, market or product type, legal or regulatory jurisdiction, and other factors. Alternative reference rates that replace LIBOR may not yield the same or similar economic results over the lives of the financial instruments, which could adversely affect the value of and return on these instruments.
Any changes to or discontinuation of LIBOR may have an adverse effect on the premium rates we are required to pay in connection with our existing insurance-linked notes transactions, which are tied to LIBOR, or other assets or liabilities whose value is tied to LIBOR or to a LIBOR alternative, including floating rate bonds that we hold in our investment portfolio and borrowings under our credit facility which currently uses LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing the interest rate. Furthermore, changes to or the discontinuation of LIBOR may impact our investment portfolio and our cost of debt, as well as other aspects of our business, such as our insurance products, the pricing we charge and the models we use to support our business decisions. It is possible that the discontinuance or replacement of LIBOR, including the implementation of alternative benchmark rates to LIBOR, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
The current financial strength ratings assignedRisks Related to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries could weaken our competitive position.
Radian Guaranty has been assigned a rating of Baa1 by Moody’sLiquidity and a rating of BBB+ by S&P. While Radian Guaranty’s financial strength ratings currently are investment grade, these ratings are below the ratings assigned to certain other private mortgage insurers. We do not believe our ratings have had a material adverse effect on our relationships with existing customers. However, if financial strength ratings become a more prominent consideration for lenders, we may be competitively disadvantaged by customers choosing to do business with private mortgage insurers that have higher financial strength ratings. In addition, the current PMIERs do not include a specific ratings requirement with respect to eligibility, but if this were to change in the future, we may become subject to a ratings requirement in order to retain our eligibility status under the PMIERs.
The GSEs currently consider financial strength ratings, among other items, to determine the amount of collateral that an insurer must post when participating in the credit risk transfer transactions currently being conducted by the GSEs. As a result, the returns that we are able to achieve when participating in these transactions are dependent, in part, on our financial strength ratings. We currently use Radian Reinsurance to participate in the GSEs’ credit risk transfer transactions. Radian Reinsurance has been assigned a rating of BBB+ by S&P. Market participants with higher ratings than us are assigned lower collateral requirements by the GSEs for these transactions and generally have a lower cost of capital, which may give them a competitive advantage, including the ability to price more aggressively for these transactions.
We believe that financial strength ratings remain a significant consideration for participants seeking to secure credit enhancement in the non-GSE mortgage market, which includes most non-qualified mortgage loans. While this market has remained limited since the financial crisis, we view this market as an area of potential future growth, which could be further accelerated by changes to the QM Rule currently under consideration by the CFPB, and our ability to successfully participate in this market could depend on our ability to secure higher ratings for our mortgage insurance subsidiaries. In addition, if legislative or regulatory changes were to alter the current state of the housing finance industry such that the GSEs no longer operate in their current capacity, we may be forced to compete in a new marketplace in which financial strength ratings may play a greater role. If we are unable to compete effectively in the current or any future markets as a result of the financial strength ratings assigned to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries, the franchise value and future prospects for our mortgage insurance business could be negatively affected.
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to manage risks in our investment portfolio.
Our investment portfolio is an important source of revenue and is our primary source of claims paying resources. Although our investment portfolio consists mostly of highly-rated fixed income investments, our investment strategy is affected by general economic conditions, which may adversely affect the markets for credit and interest-rate-sensitive securities, including the extent and timing of investor participation in these markets, the level and volatility of interest rates and credit spreads and, consequently, the value of our fixed income securities, and as such, we may not achieve our investment objectives. Volatility or lack of liquidity in the markets in which we hold positions has at times reduced the market value of some of our investments, and if this worsens substantially it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
Interest rates and investment yields on our investments continue to be low compared to historical averages, which has reduced the investment income we generate. Although in recent years our portfolio yield has been increasing, continued low interest rates could negatively affect our portfolio yield. For the significant portion of our investment portfolio held by our insurance subsidiaries, to receive full capital credit under insurance regulatory requirements and under the PMIERs, we generally are limited to investing in highly-rated investments that are unlikely to increase our investment returns. Because we depend on our investments as a source of revenue, a prolonged period of lower than expected investment yields would have an adverse impact on our revenues and could potentially adversely affect our results of operations. Further, future updates to the NAIC Model Act or PMIERs could impact our investment choices, which could negatively impact our investment strategy.
In addition, we structure our investment portfolio to satisfy our expected liabilities, including claim payments in our mortgage insurance business. If we underestimate our liabilities or improperly structure our investments to meet these liabilities, we could have unexpected losses resulting from the forced liquidation of investments before their maturity, which could adversely affect our results of operations.Financing
Radian Group’s sources of liquidity may be insufficient to fund its obligations.
Radian Group serves as the holding company for our operating subsidiaries and does not have any operations of its own. As of December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Group had available, either directly or through unregulated subsidiaries, unrestricted cash and liquid investments of $652.6 million.$1.1 billion. This amount excludes certain additional cash and liquid investments that have been advanced to Radian Group from our subsidiaries for corporate expenses and interest payments. Total liquidity, which includes our undrawn $267.5$267.5 million unsecured revolving credit facility entered into in October 2017, was $920.1 million $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2019.2020. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity Analysis—Holding Company” for more information on our liquidity demands, including as impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
We expectAs a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may experience an elevated level of new defaults in future periods. The number, timing and duration of new defaults and, in turn, the number of defaults that ultimately result in claims will depend, among other factors, on the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the resulting impact on the economy, including unemployment and housing prices, and the impact of government programs to provide economic and individual relief. If existing and future new defaults materially reduce Radian Guaranty’s PMIERs Cushion, we may be required or otherwise choose to contribute capital to Radian Guaranty. The amount that Radian Group could be required to contribute to Radian Guaranty could be significant and, under extreme economic scenarios, exhaust Radian Group’s principal liquidity demands foravailable liquidity. See “—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the next 12 months to be: (i)GSEs, and the payment of corporate expenses, including taxes; (ii) interest payments on our outstanding debt obligations; (iii) the payment of dividends on our common stock, which we recently increased to $0.125 per share; and (iv) the repurchases of Radian Group common stock pursuant to our authorized share repurchase program.
In addition to our ongoing short-term liquidity needs discussed above, our most significant need for liquidity beyond the next 12 months is the repayment of $900 million aggregate principal amount of our senior debt due in future years. Radian Group’s liquidity demands for the next 12 months or in future periods could also include: (i) early repurchases or redemptions of portions of our debt obligations and (ii) potential investmentsadditional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our business strategy, including potentialavailable liquidity” above for additional capital contributions to our subsidiaries and possible acquisitions or investments in new businesses.information.
In addition to available cash and marketable securities, Radian Group’s principalmost significant near-term sources of cash to fund future liquidity needs include: (i) payments made to Radian Group by its subsidiaries under expense- and tax-sharing arrangements;arrangements and; (ii) net investment income earned on its cash and marketable securities; (iii) to the extent available, dividends or other distributions from our subsidiaries; and (iv) amounts that Radian Guaranty is able to repay under the Surplus Notes. Radian Group also has in place a $267.5 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of bank lenders. At December 31, 2019, the full $267.5 million remains undrawn and available under the facility.securities. Radian Group’s expense-sharing arrangements with its principal operating subsidiaries require those subsidiaries to pay their allocated share of certain holding-company-level expenses, including interest payments on ourRadian Group’s outstanding senior notes. The expense-sharingexpense-sharing arrangements between Radian Group and our mortgage insurance subsidiaries, as amended, have been approved by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department, but such approval may be modified or revoked at any time.
In light of Radian Guaranty’s negative unassigned surplus related to operating losses in prior periods, and the ongoing need to set aside contingency reserves, and the current ongoing economic uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which could increase losses in future periods, we do not anticipate that Radian Guaranty will be permitted under applicable insurance laws to pay ordinary dividends to Radian Group for the foreseeable future. Based on the typical 10-year holding requirement, Radian Guaranty is scheduled to release contingency reserves to unassigned surplus in material amounts beginning in 2024,
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
which should accelerate the reduction of its negative unassigned surplus. See Note 1816 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on contingency reserve requirements.
Further, In addition, pursuant to the Services segment has not generated sufficient cash flows toNational Emergency Guidelines, through June 30, 2021, the consent of the GSEs is required for Radian Guaranty to: (i) pay dividends or make payments of principal or increase payments of interest beyond those commitments made prior to June 30, 2020 associated with the Surplus Notes; (ii) make any other payments, unless related to expenses incurred in the normal course of business or to commitments made prior to June 30, 2020; (iii) pledge or transfer asset(s) to any affiliate or investor; or (iv) enter into any new arrangements or alter any existing arrangements under tax sharing and intercompany expense-sharing agreements other than renewals and extensions of agreements in effect prior to June 30, 2020. These restrictions could prohibit or delay Radian Guaranty from taking certain actions that would be advantageous to it or to Radian Group. In the event the cash flow from operations
As of December 31, 2019, certain of our subsidiaries have incurred federal NOLs that could not be carried-back and utilized on a separate company tax return basis. As a result, we are not currently obligated under our tax-sharing agreement to reimburse these subsidiaries for their separate company federal NOL carryforward. However, if in a future period, one of these subsidiaries utilizes its share of federal NOL carryforwards on a separate entity basis, then Radian Group may be obligated to fund such subsidiary’s share of our consolidated tax liability to the IRS. Certain subsidiaries currently have federal NOLs on a separate entity basis that are available for future utilization. However, we do not expect to fund material obligations related to these subsidiary NOLs.GlossaryPart I Item 1A. Risk Factors
In light of Radian Group’s short- and long-term needs, it is possible that our sources of liquidity could be insufficient to fund our obligations and could exceed available holding company funds. If this were to occur, we may need or otherwise may decide to increase our available liquidity, including by reducing our quarterly dividend or terminating our stock repurchase authorizations, incurring additional debt, by issuing additional equity or by selling assets, any of which we may be unable to do on favorable terms, if at all.
Our revolving credit facility contains restrictive covenants that could limit our operating flexibility. A default under our credit facility could trigger an event of default under the terms of our senior notes. We may not have access to funding under our credit facility when we require it.
Radian Group is a party to a $267.5 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of bank lenders. As of December 31, 2019,2020, no borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility.
The credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants that, among other things, provide certain limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, create liens, transfer or dispose of assets, merge with or acquire other companies and pay dividends. The credit facility also requires us to comply with certain financial covenants and further provides that: (i) Radian Group must be rated by S&P or Moody’s and (ii) Radian Guaranty must remain eligible under the PMIERs to insure loans purchased by the GSEs. A failure to comply with these covenants or the other terms of the credit facility could result in an event of default, which could: (a) result in the termination of the commitments by the lenders to make loans to Radian Group under the credit facility and (b) enable the lenders to declare, subject to the terms and conditions of the credit facility, any outstanding obligations under the credit facility to be immediately due and payable.
Further, the occurrence of an event of default under the terms of our credit facility may trigger an event of default under the terms of our senior notes. An event of default would occur under the terms of our senior notes if a default: (i) in any scheduled payment of principal of other indebtedness by Radian Group or its subsidiaries of more than $100 million principal amount occurs, after giving effect to any applicable grace period or (ii) in the performance of any term or provision of any indebtedness of Radian Group or its subsidiaries in excess of $100 million principal amount occurs that results in the acceleration of the date such indebtedness is due and payable, subject to certain limited exceptions. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the carrying value of our senior notes.
If the commitments of the lenders under the credit facility are terminated or we are unable to satisfy certain covenants or representations, we may not have access to funding in a timely manner, or at all, when we require it. If funding is not available under the credit facility when we require it, our ability to continue our business practices or pursue our current strategy could be limited. If the indebtedness under the credit facility or our senior notes is accelerated, we may not be able to repay our debt or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it.
Our credit facility terminates on October 16, 2020January 18, 2022 and we may be unable to renew or replace this facility on acceptable terms. If we are unable to obtain new financing or funding when needed, or if there were to be an event of default under our credit facility or senior notes for any reason, our cash flows, financial results or financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
We may not continueRisks Related to pay dividends at the same rate we are currently paying them, or at all,Information Technology and any decrease in or suspension of payment of a dividend could cause our stock price to decline.
Effective February 13, 2020, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized an increase to the Company’s quarterly cash dividend to $0.125 per share effective for the quarterly dividend payable in March 2020. The payment of future cash dividends
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
is subject to the determination each quarter by our board of directors that the dividend remains in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, which determination will be based on a number of factors, including, among others, economic conditions, our earnings, financial condition, actual and forecasted cash flows, capital resources, capital requirements and alternative uses of capital, including potential investments to support our business strategy and possible acquisitions or investments in new businesses. Any decrease in the amount of the dividend, or suspension or discontinuance of payment of a dividend, could cause our stock price to decline.
Our reported earnings are subject to fluctuations based on changes in our trading securities, equity securities and short-term investments that require us to adjust their fair market value.
We have significant holdings of trading securities, equity securities and short-term investments that we carry at fair value. Because the changes in fair value of these financial instruments are reflected on our statements of operations each period, they affect our reported earnings and can create earnings volatility. Among other factors, interest rate changes, market volatility and declines in the value of underlying collateral will impact the value of our investments, potentially resulting in unrealized losses that could negatively impact our results of operations.Cybersecurity
Our information technology systems may fail or become outmoded, be temporarily interrupted or otherwise cause us to be unable to meet our customers’ demands.
Our business is highly dependent on the effective operation of our information technology systems, which are vulnerable to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, security breaches, catastrophic events and errors in usage. Although we have disaster recovery and business continuity plans in place, we may not be able to adequately execute these plans in a timely fashion.
Additionally, our ability to meet the needs of our customers depends on our ability to keep pace with technological advances and to invest in new technology as it becomes available or otherwise upgrade our technological capabilities. We rely on e-commerce and other technologies to provide our products and services to our customers, and they generally require that we provide an increasing number of our products and services electronically. Accordingly, we may not satisfy our customers’ requirements if we fail to invest sufficient resources or are otherwise unable to maintain and upgrade our technological capabilities. Further, customers may choose to do business only with business partners with which they are technologically compatible and may choose to retain existing relationships with mortgage insurance or mortgage and real estate services providers rather than invest the time and resources to on-board new providers. As a result, technology can represent a potential barrier to signing new customers.
Because we rely on our information technology systems for many critical functions, including connecting with our customers, if such systems were to fail, experience a prolonged interruption, or become outmoded, we may experience a significant disruption in our operations and in the business we receive, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
In addition, we are in the process
Table of implementing a major technology project to improve our operating systems, including a new platform for our mortgage insurance underwriting, policy administration, claims management and billing processes. The implementation of these technological improvements is complex, expensive, time consuming and, in certain respects, depends on the ability of third parties to perform their obligations in a timely manner. If we fail to timely and successfully implement the new technology systems and business processes, or if the systems do not operate as expected, it could have an adverse impact on our business, business prospects and results of operations.Contents Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
We could incur significant liability or reputational harm if the security of our information technology systems is breached, including as result of a cyberattack, or we otherwise fail to protect confidential information, including non-public personal information that we maintain.
We rely on information technology systems to process, transmit, store and protect the electronic information, financial data and proprietary models that are critical to our business. Furthermore, a significant portion of the communications between us and our employees, customers, business partners and service providers depends on information technology and electronic information exchange.
Our reliance on information technology has been further accelerated by the widespread transition to work-from-home measures following the outbreak of COVID-19. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to protect our employees and in response to governmental and other third-party measures restricting interpersonal contact, travel and business operations, we activated our business continuity program by transitioning to a work-from-home virtual workforce model. Remote working arrangements may increase the risk of cyber-security attacks or data security incidents.
Our information technology systems may be vulnerable to physical or electronic intrusions, computer viruses or other attacks, including cyberattacks. In recent years, cyberattacks such as distributed denial of service attacks, computer viruses, hacking, malware, ransomware, phishing or other forms of social engineering and insider threats designed to obtain confidential information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or to cause other damage have grown in volume and level of sophistication. Further, theThe risks of cyberattacks and information security breaches continue to increase in businesses such as ours due to, among other things, the proliferation of new technologies and the use of digital channels to conduct our business, including connectivity with customer devices that are beyond our security control systems.systems and the use of portable computers or mobile devices which can be stolen, lost or damaged.
As part of our business, we, and certain of our subsidiaries and affiliates, maintain large amounts of confidential information, including non-public personal information on borrowers, consumers and our employees. If the security of our
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
information technology is breached, including as a result of a cyberattack, it could result in the loss or misuse of this information, which could, in turn, result in potential regulatory actions or litigation, including material claims for damages, as well as interruption to our operations and damage to our customer relationships and reputation. While we have information security policies, controls and systems in place in order to attempt to prevent, detect and respond to unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information, including non-public personal information, there can be no assurance that such use or disclosure will not occur. Any cybersecurity event or other compromise of the security of our information technology systems, or unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information, could subject us to liability, regulatory scrutiny and action, damage our reputation and negatively affect our ability to attract and maintain customers, and could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiaries Generally
We may not continue to pay dividends at the same rate we are currently paying them, or at all, and any decrease in or suspension of payment of a dividend could cause our stock price to decline.
Effective February 13, 2020, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized an increase to the Company’s quarterly cash dividend to $0.125 per share effective for the quarterly dividend payable in March 2020. The payment of future cash dividends is subject to the determination each quarter by our board of directors that the dividend remains in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, which determination will be based on a number of factors, including, among others, economic conditions, our earnings, financial condition, actual and forecasted cash flows, capital resources, capital requirements and alternative uses of capital, including potential investments to support our business strategy and possible acquisitions or investments in new businesses. Any decrease in the amount of the dividend, or suspension or discontinuance of payment of a dividend, could cause our stock price to decline.
We are subject to litigation and regulatory proceedings.
We operate in highly regulated industries that are subject to a heightened risk of litigation and regulatory proceedings. We often are a party to material litigation and also are subject to legal and regulatory claims, assertions, actions, reviews, audits, inquiries and investigations. Additional lawsuits, legal and regulatory proceedings and inquiries and other matters may arise in the future. The outcome of existing and future legal and regulatory proceedings and inquiries and other matters could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restitutions or other relief which could require significant expenditures or have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”
LegislationProceedings” and administrative and regulatory changes and interpretations could impact our businesses.
Our businesses are subjectNote 13 of Notes to and may be impacted by many federal and state lending, insurance and consumer laws and regulations and may be affected by changes in these laws and regulations or the way they are interpreted or applied. In particular, our businesses may be significantly impacted by the following:
legislation, administrative or regulatory action impacting the charters or business practices of the GSEs;
reform of the U.S. housing finance system;
legislation and regulation impacting the FHA and its competitive position versus private mortgage insurers;
state insurance laws and regulations that address, among other items, licensing of companies to transact business, claims handling, reinsurance requirements, premium rates, policy forms offered to customers and requirements for Risk-to-capital, minimum policyholder positions, reserves (including contingency reserves), surplus, reinsurance and payment of dividends;
the application of state, federal or private sector programs aimed at supporting borrowers and the housing market;
the application of RESPA, the FCRA and other laws to our businesses;
new federal standards and oversight for mortgage insurers, including as a result of the recommendation of the Federal Insurance Office of the U.S. Department of the Treasury that federal standards and oversight for mortgage insurers be developed and implemented;
the implementation of new regulations under, or the potential repeal or amendment of provisions of, the Dodd-Frank Act, including future changes in the QM Rule and QM loan requirements as are currently being contemplated by the CFPB; and
the implementation in the U.S. of the Basel III capital adequacy guidelines.
See “Item 1. Business—Regulation.”
Any of the items discussed above could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and business prospects. In addition, our businesses could be impacted by new legislation or regulations, as well as changes to existing legislation or regulations or the way they are interpreted or applied, including changes that are not currently contemplated and which could occur at any time.Consolidated Financial Statements.
We rely on our management team and our business could be harmed if we are unable to retain qualified personnel or successfully develop and/or recruit their replacements.
Our success depends, in part, on the skills, working relationships and continued services of our management team and other key personnel, any of whom could terminate his or her relationship with us at any time. The unexpected departure of key personnel could adversely affect the conduct of our business. In such event, we would be required to obtain other personnel to
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
manage and operate our business. In addition, we will be required to replace the knowledge and expertise of our workforce as
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
our workers retire. In either case, there can be no assurance that we would be able to develop or recruit suitable replacements for the departing individuals, that replacements could be hired, if necessary, on terms that are favorable to us, or that we can successfully transition such replacements in a timely manner. Failure to effectively implement our succession planning efforts and to ensure effective transfers of knowledge and smooth transitions involving members of our management team and other key personnel could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Without a properly skilled and experienced workforce, our costs, including costs associated with a loss of productivity and costs to replace employees, may increase, and this could negatively impact our earnings.
We may make investments to grow our existing businesses, pursue new lines of business or new business initiatives, acquire other companies or engage in other strategic initiatives, each of which may result in additional risks and uncertainties.
In support of our growth and diversification strategy, we may make strategic investments, acquisitions or pursue other strategic initiatives that expose us to additional risks and uncertainties that include, without limitation:
■the use of capital and potential diversion of other resources, such as the diversion of management’s attention from our core businesses and potential disruption of those businesses;
■the assumption of liabilities in connection with any strategic investment, including any acquired business;
■our ability to comply with additional regulatory requirements associated with new products, services, lines of business, or other business or strategic initiatives;
■our ability to successfully integrate or develop the operations of any new business initiative or acquisition;
■the possibility that any new business initiatives may be disruptive to, or competitive with, our existing customer relationships;customers;
■the possibility that we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of an acquisition or other strategic investment or initiative, including expected synergies, cost savings, or sales or growth opportunities, within the anticipated timeframe or at all; and
■the possibility that we may fail to achieve forecasted results for a strategic investment, acquisition or other initiative that could result in lower or negative earnings contribution and/or impairment charges associated with intangible assets acquired.
We face risks associated with our Services business.
Our Services business exposes us to certain risks that may negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition, including, among others, the following:
Our Services revenue is dependent on a limited number of large customers that represent a significant proportion of our Services total revenues. The loss or reduction of business from one or more of these significant customers could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. In addition, Radian Guaranty does business with many of these significant customers. In the event of a dispute between a significant customer and either of our business segments, the overall customer relationship for Radian could be negatively impacted.
Due to the transactional nature of our business, our Services segment revenues are subject to fluctuation from period to period and are difficult to predict.
The services we offer through our Services business are influenced by the level of overall activity in the mortgage, real estate and mortgage finance markets generally. If real estate transaction volumes decline, we could experience less demand for our real estate and title services.
Red Bell is a licensed real estate brokerage and provides real estate brokerage services in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. As a licensed real estate brokerage, Red Bell receives residential real estate information from various multiple listing services (“MLS”). Red Bell receives this information, which it uses in its business to broker real estate transactions and provide valuation products and services, pursuant to the terms of agreements with the MLS providers. If these agreements were to terminate or Red Bell otherwise were to lose access to this information, it could negatively impact Red Bell’s ability to conduct its business and our future real estate strategies.
By their nature, title claims are often complex, vary greatly in dollar amounts and are affected by economic and market conditions and the legal environment existing at the time of settlement of the claims. Estimating future title loss payments is difficult because of the complex nature of title claims, the long periods of time over which claims
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
are paid, significantly varying dollar amounts of individual claims and other factors. From time to time, we could experience large losses or an overall worsening of our loss payment experience in regard to the frequency or severity of claims that require us to record additional charges to our claims loss reserve. These loss events are unpredictable and could adversely affect the financial performance of our Services business.
| |
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
Item 2. Properties
In addition to leases of other properties and facilities to support our business operations, the Company currently leases approximately 174,000 square feet of office and storage space at our corporate headquarters, located at 1500 Market Street, West Tower, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This property is used by both our reportable segments and our corporate functions.
We believe our existing properties are well utilized, suitable and adequate for their intended use. Despite nearly all of our present circumstances.employees currently working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, the longer-term strategy is for our current sites and offices to be re-occupied with more flexible work arrangements for our employees once it is safe for our employees to return to the office.
| |
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are routinely involved in a number of legal actions and proceedings, including reviews, audits and inquiries by various regulatory entities, as well as litigation and other disputes arising in the ordinary course of our business. These proceedings could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restitutions or other relief that could require significant expenditures or have other effects on our business. Management believes, based on current knowledgeSee Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding legal and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. The outcome of litigationregulatory matters and otherproceedings.
The legal and regulatory matters and proceedings is inherently uncertain, and it is possible that one or more of the matters currently pending or threatened could have an adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations for any particular period. In accordance with applicable accounting standards and guidance, we establish accruals only when we determine both that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. We accrue the amount that represents our best estimate of the probable loss; however, if we can only determine a range of estimated losses, we accrue an amount within the range that,discussed in our judgment, reflects the most likely outcome, and if none of the estimates within the range is more likely, we accrue the minimum amount of the range.
In the course of our regular review of pending legal and regulatory matters, we determine whether it is reasonably possible that a potential loss may have a material impact on our liquidity, results of operations or financial condition. If we determine such a loss is reasonably possible, we disclose information relating to such potential loss, including an estimate or range of loss or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. On a quarterly basis, we review relevant information with respect to loss contingencies and update our accruals, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible losses or range of losses based on such reviews. We are often unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss until developments in such matters have provided sufficient information to support an assessment of the range of possible loss, such as quantification of a damage demand from plaintiffs, discovery from other parties and investigation of factual allegations, rulings by the court on motions or appeals, analysis by experts, and the progress of settlement negotiations. In addition, we generally make no disclosures for loss contingencies that are determined to be remote. For matters for which we disclose an estimated loss, the disclosed estimate reflects the reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amount accrued, if any.
Loss estimates are inherently subjective, based on currently available information, and are subject to management’s judgment and various assumptions. Due to the inherently subjective nature of these estimates and the uncertainty and unpredictability surrounding the outcome of legal and other proceedings, actual results may differ materially from any amounts that have been accrued.
On December 22, 2016, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Homeward Residential, Inc. (collectively, “Ocwen”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Radian Guaranty alleging breach of contract and bad faith claims and seeking monetary damages and declaratory relief. Ocwen has also initiated similar legal proceedings against several other mortgage insurers. On December 17, 2016, Ocwen separately filed a parallel arbitration petition against Radian Guaranty before the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) asserting substantially the same allegations (the “Arbitration”). Ocwen’s filings together listed 9,420 mortgage insurance certificates issued under multiple insurance policies, including Pool Insurance policies, as subject to the dispute. On June 5, 2017, Ocwen filed an amended complaint and an amended petition (collectively, the “Amended Filings”) with both the court and the AAA, respectively, together listing 8,870 certificates as subject to the dispute. On April 11, 2018, the parties entered into a confidential agreement with respect to all certificates subject to the dispute. The confidential agreement resolved certain categories of claims involved
Part I Item 3. Legal Proceedings
in the dispute and, on April 12, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation of voluntary dismissal of the federal court proceeding and the trial judge issued an order dismissing all claims and counterclaims subject to the parties’ agreement. Radian Guaranty was not required to make any payment in connection with this confidential agreement. Pursuant to the confidential agreement, the parties: (1) dismissed the federal court proceeding; (2) narrowed the scope of the dispute to Ocwen’s breach of contract claims seeking payment of insurance benefits on approximately 2,500 certificates that Ocwen was previously pursuing through the Amended Filings; and (3) agreed to resolve the remaining dispute through the Arbitration. The Arbitration is proceeding, and Radian continues to defend against Ocwen’s claims vigorously.
On August 31, 2018, Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (“Nationstar”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Radian Guaranty (the “Complaint”) alleging breach of contract, bad faith,equitable indemnification, unjust enrichment, and conversion claims and seeking monetary damages and declaratory relief. Exhibit 1 to the Complaint lists 3,014 mortgage insurance certificates issued under multiple insurance policies as subject to disputes involving insurance coverage decisions (the “Coverage Disputed Loans”). Exhibit 2 to the Complaint further lists 2,231 mortgage insurance certificates issued under multiple insurance policies as subject to disputes involving premium refund requests. In December 2018, Radian Guaranty filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint. In March 2019, the trial judge issued an order granting in part, and denying in part, our motion to dismiss, and dismissed Nationstar’s unjust enrichment and conversion claims. In May 2019, Radian Guaranty filed an answer, with affirmative defenses and counterclaims, in response to the Complaint. On September 23, 2019, the trial judge entered as an order a joint stipulation submitted by Nationstar and Radian Guaranty that narrowed the scope of the dispute involving Coverage Disputed Loans to claims relating to 1,704 mortgage insurance certificates. Radian Guaranty believes that Nationstar’s allegations and claims in the legal proceedings described above are without merit and legally deficient, and continues to defend against these claims vigorously.
In 2019, the Company increased its IBNR reserve estimate by $30.5 million related to our best estimate of our probable loss in connection with the above legal proceedings. While Radian believes it has substantial defenses in these matters and intends to continue to defend against these claims vigorously, it is not feasible to predict the ultimate outcome of these disputes, and the Company could in the future be required to pay amounts as a result of settlements or decisions in these matters, potentially in excess of accruals.
We also are periodically subject to reviews and audits, as well as inquiries, information-gathering requests and investigations. In connection with these matters, from time to time we receive requests and subpoenas seeking information and documents related to aspects of our business.
Our Master Policies establish the timeline within which any suit or action arising from any right of an insured under the
policy generally must be commenced. In general, any suit or action arising from any right of an insured under the policy must be commenced within two years after such right first arose for primary insurance and within three years for certain other policies, including certain Pool Insurance policies. Although we believe that our Loss Mitigation Activities are justified under our policies, we continue to face challenges from certain lender and servicer customers regarding our Loss Mitigation Activities, which may result in some reversals of our decisions regarding Rescissions, Claim Denials or Claim Curtailments. To the extent we are unable to resolve challenges from our customers regarding Loss Mitigation Activities and our claim payment practices, it could result in arbitration or judicial proceedings and we may need to reassume the risk on, and increase
loss reserves for, those policies or pay additional claims.
The legal and regulatory matters discussed abovereport could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restitutions or other relief that could require significant expenditures or have other effects on our business. Management believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. The outcome of litigation and other legal and regulatory matters and proceedings is inherently uncertain, and it is possible that one or more of the matters currently pending or threatened could have an adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations for any particular period.
| |
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures. |
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
61
PART II
| |
Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “RDN.” At February 25, 2020,24, 2021, there were 198,640,237191,688,864 shares of our common stock outstanding and 5456 holders of record.
In 20192020 and 2018,2019, we declared quarterly cash dividends on our common stock equal to $0.125 and $0.0025 per share.share, respectively. We presently expect to continue to declare a regular quarterly dividend on our common stock. On February 13, 2020, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized an increase to the Company’s quarterly cash dividend from $0.0025 to $0.125 per share. For information on Radian Group’s ability to pay dividends, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Reference is made to the information in Item 12 of this report under the caption “Equity Compensation Plans,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Issuance of Unregistered Securities
During the last three years, no equity securities of the Company were sold that were not registered under the Securities Act.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information about purchases of Radian Group common stock by us (and our affiliated purchasers) during the three months ended December 31, 2019.2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | Average Price
Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
| Share repurchase program | | | | | | | | |
| Period: | | | | | | | | |
| 10/1/2020 to 10/31/2020 | | — | | | $ | — | | | — | | | $ | 198,860 | |
| 11/1/2020 to 11/30/2020 | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 198,860 | |
| 12/1/2020 to 12/31/2020 | | 18,596 | | | 19.91 | | | — | | | 198,860 | |
| Total | | 18,596 | | | | | — | | | |
(1)Includes 18,596 shares tendered by employees as payment of taxes withheld on the vesting of certain restricted stock awards granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans.
(2)On August 14, 2019, Radian Group’s board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to spend up to $200 million to repurchase Radian Group common stock. On February 13, 2020, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized a $275 million increase in this program, bringing the total authorization to repurchase shares up to $475 million, excluding commissions. Effective March 19, 2020, the Company temporarily suspended purchases under its share repurchase program in response to uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and canceled its then current 10b5-1 plan. The Company purchased no shares during the three months ended December 31, 2020, under this share repurchase program, which expires on August 31, 2021. As of February 24, 2021, purchase authority of up to $198.9 million remained available under this program. See Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | | | | | | | |
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
| Share repurchase program | | | | | | | |
| 10/1/2019 to 10/31/2019 | 1,094,069 |
| | $ | 22.93 |
| | 1,090,875 |
| | $ | 150,000 |
|
| 11/1/2019 to 11/30/2019 | 434 |
| | 25.46 |
| | — |
| | 150,000 |
|
| 12/1/2019 to 12/31/2019 | 401 |
| | 25.37 |
| | — |
| | 150,000 |
|
| Total | 1,094,904 |
| | | | 1,090,875 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Includes 4,029 shares tendered by employees as payment of taxes withheld on the vesting of certain restricted stock awards granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans. |
| |
(2) | On August 14, 2019, Radian Group’s board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to spend up to $200 million to repurchase Radian Group common stock. Pursuant to this authorization, during the three months ended December 31, 2019, the Company purchased 1,090,875 shares at an average price of $22.93 per share, including commissions. On February 13, 2020, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized a $275 million increase in this program, bringing the total authorization to repurchase shares up to $475 million, excluding commissions. This share repurchase program expires on August 31, 2021. As of February 25, 2020, purchase authority of up to $359.2 million remained available under this program. See Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
Part II Item 6. Selected Financial Data
| |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data. |
The information in the following tabletables should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8 and the information included in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions, except per-share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net premiums earned | | $ | 1,115.3 | | | $ | 1,145.3 | | | $ | 1,014.0 | | | $ | 932.8 | | | $ | 921.8 | |
| Services revenue | | 105.4 | | | 154.6 | | | 145.0 | | | 155.1 | | | 168.9 | |
| Net investment income | | 154.0 | | | 171.8 | | | 152.5 | | | 127.2 | | | 113.5 | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 60.3 | | | 51.7 | | | (42.5) | | | 3.6 | | | 30.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | | 1,438.6 | | | 1,527.0 | | | 1,273.0 | | | 1,221.6 | | | 1,238.5 | |
| Provision for losses | | 485.1 | | | 132.0 | | | 104.6 | | | 135.2 | | | 202.8 | |
| Cost of services | | 86.1 | | | 108.3 | | | 98.1 | | | 104.6 | | | 114.2 | |
| Other operating expenses | | 280.7 | | | 306.1 | | | 280.8 | | | 267.3 | | | 244.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | 71.2 | | | 56.3 | | | 61.5 | | | 62.8 | | | 81.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | — | | | 22.7 | | | — | | | 51.5 | | | 75.1 | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | — | | | 4.8 | | | — | | | 184.4 | | | — | |
| Amortization and impairment of acquired intangible assets | | 5.1 | | | 22.3 | | | 12.4 | | | 27.7 | | | 13.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Pretax income from continuing operations | | 479.4 | | | 849.0 | | | 684.2 | | | 346.7 | | | 483.7 | |
| Income tax provision | | 85.8 | | | 176.7 | | | 78.2 | | | 225.6 | | | 175.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | 393.6 | | | 672.3 | | | 606.0 | | | 121.1 | | | 308.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted net income per share (1) | | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 3.20 | | | $ | 2.77 | | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 1.37 | |
| Cash dividends declared per share | | $ | 0.50 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 0.01 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted (1) | | 196.6 | | | 210.3 | | | 218.6 | | | 220.4 | | | 229.3 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions, except per-share amounts and ratios) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations | | | | | | | | | |
| Net premiums earned—insurance | $ | 1,145.3 |
| | $ | 1,014.0 |
| | $ | 932.8 |
| | $ | 921.8 |
| | $ | 915.9 |
|
| Services revenue | 154.6 |
| | 145.0 |
| | 155.1 |
| | 168.9 |
| | 157.2 |
|
| Net investment income | 171.8 |
| | 152.5 |
| | 127.2 |
| | 113.5 |
| | 81.5 |
|
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 51.7 |
| | (42.5 | ) | | 3.6 |
| | 30.8 |
| | 35.7 |
|
| Total revenues | 1,527.0 |
| | 1,273.0 |
| | 1,221.6 |
| | 1,238.5 |
| | 1,193.3 |
|
| Provision for losses | 132.0 |
| | 104.6 |
| | 135.2 |
| | 202.8 |
| | 198.6 |
|
| Cost of services | 108.3 |
| | 98.1 |
| | 104.6 |
| | 114.2 |
| | 93.7 |
|
| Other operating expenses | 306.1 |
| | 280.8 |
| | 267.3 |
| | 244.9 |
| | 242.4 |
|
| Restructuring and other exit costs | — |
| | 6.1 |
| | 17.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Interest expense | 56.3 |
| | 61.5 |
| | 62.8 |
| | 81.1 |
| | 91.1 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill | 4.8 |
| | — |
| | 184.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization and impairment of acquired intangible assets | 22.3 |
| | 12.4 |
| | 27.7 |
| | 13.2 |
| | 13.0 |
|
| Pretax income from continuing operations | 849.0 |
| | 684.2 |
| | 346.7 |
| | 483.7 |
| | 437.8 |
|
| Income tax provision | 176.7 |
| | 78.2 |
| | 225.6 |
| | 175.4 |
| | 156.3 |
|
| Net income | 672.3 |
| | 606.0 |
| | 121.1 |
| | 308.3 |
| | 286.9 |
|
Diluted net income per share (1) | $ | 3.20 |
| | $ | 2.77 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | 1.37 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
|
| Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted (1) | 210.3 |
| | 218.6 |
| | 220.4 |
| | 229.3 |
| | 246.3 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions, except per-share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total investments | | $ | 6,788.4 | | | $ | 5,658.7 | | | $ | 5,153.0 | | | $ | 4,643.9 | | | $ | 4,462.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | | 7,948.0 | | | 6,808.3 | | | 6,314.7 | | | 5,900.9 | | | 5,863.2 | |
| Unearned premiums | | 448.8 | | | 626.8 | | | 739.4 | | | 723.9 | | | 681.2 | |
| Reserve for losses and LAE | | 848.4 | | | 404.8 | | | 401.4 | | | 507.6 | | | 760.3 | |
Senior notes (1) | | 1,405.7 | | | 887.1 | | | 1,030.3 | | | 1,027.1 | | | 1,069.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Stockholders’ equity | | 4,284.4 | | | 4,048.7 | | | 3,488.7 | | | 3,000.0 | | | 2,872.3 | |
| Book value per share | | $ | 22.36 | | | $ | 20.13 | | | $ | 16.34 | | | $ | 13.90 | | | $ | 13.39 | |
(1)Includes senior notes and convertible senior notes.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Selected Ratios—Mortgage | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss ratio (1) | | 44.2 | % | | 11.6 | % | | 10.4 | % | | 14.6 | % | | 22.2 | % |
Expense ratio—net premiums earned basis (1) | | 21.2 | % | | 22.1 | % | | 23.9 | % | | 24.7 | % | | 22.7 | % |
| Risk-to-capital—Radian Guaranty only | | 12.7 | :1 | | 13.6 | :1 | | 13.9 | :1 | | 12.8 | :1 | | 13.5 | :1 |
(1)Calculated using amounts determined under GAAP, using provision for losses to calculate the loss ratio, and policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses of our Mortgage segment to calculate the expense ratio, each as percentages of net premiums earned.
Part II Item 6. Selected Financial Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions, except ratios) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Other Data—Mortgage | | | | | | | | | | |
| NIW | | $ | 105,024 | | | $ | 71,327 | | | $ | 56,547 | | | $ | 53,905 | | | $ | 50,530 | |
| Direct primary IIF | | 246,144 | | | 240,558 | | | 221,443 | | | 200,724 | | | 183,450 | |
| Direct primary RIF | | 60,656 | | | 60,921 | | | 56,728 | | | 51,288 | | | 46,741 | |
Persistency Rate (12 months ended) (1) | | 61.2 | % | | 78.2 | % | | 83.1 | % | | 81.1 | % | | 76.7 | % |
Persistency Rate (quarterly, annualized) (1) | | 60.4 | % | | 75.0 | % | | 85.5 | % | | 79.4 | % | | 76.8 | % |
(1)Persistency Rate (12 months ended) and Persistency Rate (quarterly, annualized) are based on loan level detail for the 12 months and for the fourth quarter, respectively, of each year shown. The Persistency Rate on a quarterly, annualized basis may be impacted by seasonality or other factors, and may not be indicative of full-year trends. In Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, see “Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage—IIF and Related Drivers” and “Mortgage Insurance Portfolio—Insurance and Risk in Force” for additional information about the Persistency Rate.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions, except per-share amounts and ratios) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | | | | | | | |
| Total investments | $ | 5,658.7 |
| | $ | 5,153.0 |
| | $ | 4,643.9 |
| | $ | 4,462.4 |
| | $ | 4,298.7 |
|
| Total assets | 6,808.3 |
| | 6,314.7 |
| | 5,900.9 |
| | 5,863.2 |
| | 5,642.1 |
|
| Unearned premiums | 626.8 |
| | 739.4 |
| | 723.9 |
| | 681.2 |
| | 680.3 |
|
| Reserve for losses and LAE | 404.8 |
| | 401.4 |
| | 507.6 |
| | 760.3 |
| | 976.4 |
|
Senior notes (2) | 887.1 |
| | 1,030.3 |
| | 1,027.1 |
| | 1,069.5 |
| | 1,219.5 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | 4,048.7 |
| | 3,488.7 |
| | 3,000.0 |
| | 2,872.3 |
| | 2,496.9 |
|
| Book value per share | $ | 20.13 |
| | $ | 16.34 |
| | $ | 13.90 |
| | $ | 13.39 |
| | $ | 12.07 |
|
| Selected Ratios—Mortgage Insurance | | | | | | | | | |
Loss ratio (3) | 11.6 | % | | 10.4 | % | | 14.6 | % | | 22.2 | % | | 21.7 | % |
Expense ratio—net premiums earned basis (3) | 22.2 | % | | 23.9 | % | | 24.7 | % | | 22.7 | % | | 23.7 | % |
| Risk-to-capital—Radian Guaranty only | 13.6 | :1 | | 13.9 | :1 | | 12.8 | :1 | | 13.5 | :1 | | 14.3:1 |
|
| Risk-to-capital—Mortgage Insurance combined | 12.3 | :1 | | 12.8 | :1 | | 12.1 | :1 | | 13.6 | :1 | | 14.6:1 |
|
| Other Data—Mortgage Insurance | | | | | | | | | |
| Primary NIW | $ | 71,327 |
| | $ | 56,547 |
| | $ | 53,905 |
| | $ | 50,530 |
| | $ | 41,411 |
|
| Direct primary IIF | 240,558 |
| | 221,443 |
| | 200,724 |
| | 183,450 |
| | 175,584 |
|
| Direct primary RIF | 60,921 |
| | 56,728 |
| | 51,288 |
| | 46,741 |
| | 44,627 |
|
Persistency Rate (12 months ended) (4) | 78.2 | % | | 83.1 | % | | 81.1 | % | | 76.7 | % | | 78.8 | % |
Persistency (quarterly, annualized) (4) | 75.0 | % | | 85.5 | % | | 79.4 | % | | 76.8 | % | | 81.8 | % |
______________________
| |
(1) | Diluted net income per share and average share information calculated in accordance with the accounting standard regarding earnings per share. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
(2) | Includes Senior Notes and Convertible Senior Notes. |
| |
(3) | Calculated using amounts determined under GAAP, using provision for losses to calculate the loss ratio and policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses of our Mortgage Insurance segment to calculate the expense ratio, as percentages of net premiums earned—insurance. |
| |
(4) | Based on loan level detail for the fourth quarter of each year shown. The Persistency Rate on a quarterly, annualized basis may be impacted by seasonality or other factors, and may not be indicative of full-year trends. In Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, see “Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage Insurance—IIF; Persistency Rate; Mix of Business” and “Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—NIW, IIF, RIF” for additional information about the Persistency Rate.
|
| |
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8.8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain terms and acronyms used throughout this report are defined in the Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms included as part of this report. Some of the information in this discussion and analysis or included elsewhere in this report, including information with respect to our projections, plans and strategy for our business, are forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements—Safe Harbor Provisions” and in the Risk Factors detailed in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
This section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses our financial results for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and a year-over-year comparison between 2019 and 2018. Detailed discussions of our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2017, including the year-over-year comparisons between 2018 and 2017, that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K can be found inIndex to Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC on February 28, 2019.
|
| | | | |
IItemndex to Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
| PAGEPage |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Overview
We are a diversified mortgage and real estate services business with two business segments—Mortgage Insurance and Services.Real Estate. Our Mortgage Insurance segment provides credit-related insurance coverage, principally through private mortgage insurance on residential first-lien mortgage loans, as well as other credit risk management and contract underwriting solutions, to mortgage lending institutions and mortgage credit investors. Our ServicesReal Estate segment is primarily a fee-for-service business that offers a broad array of real estate, titleproducts and mortgage services to market participants across the mortgage and real estate value chain.
Operating Environment
As a seller of mortgage credit protection and other mortgage and credit risk management solutions, our Mortgage business results are subject to macroeconomic conditions and other events that impact the housing, finance and real estate and housing finance markets, including seasonal fluctuations, that specifically impact the mortgage origination environment,and the credit performance of our underlying insured assets andas well as our future business opportunities. These include the current global pandemic as well as seasonal fluctuations that specifically affect the mortgage origination environment. The macroeconomic conditions, seasonality and other events that impact the housing, mortgage finance and related real estate markets also affect the demand for our real estate, titleproducts and mortgage services offered through our ServicesReal Estate segment.
Our mortgage insurance business continues to benefit from the improvement in market conditions sinceFollowing the financial crisis of 2007-2008 and until the first quarter of 2020, our mortgage insurance business benefited from continued improvement in market conditions evidenced by, among other things, the current strength of the U.S. economy and housing finance industry. In addition, our mortgage insurance business has benefited from strong demand for home purchases by first-time home buyers and other purchasers requiring low down payment loans. The positive growth in home prices and historically low levels of unemployment are reflected in the performance and favorable results of our existing portfolio of IIF, as evidenced by, among other things, the improvement in our levels of new defaults, incurred losses, paid claims and cure rates.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Loans originated for the private mortgage insurance marketOur NIW since 2008 havehas consisted primarily of high credit quality loans and mortgage underwriting quality remained strong throughout 2019. These high credit quality loansthat have had significantly better credit performance than the loans originated during 2008 and prior periods. Significant contributors to the improved loan quality of our post-2008 insured portfolio include the greater risk discipline of loan originators and the private mortgage insurance providers, the Qualified Mortgage (QM)QM loan requirements under the Dodd Frank Act (including the QM Patch, which is scheduled to expire in January 2021) and the loan-level criteria of the PMIERs financial requirements.
BasedBeginning in March 2020, the unprecedented and continually evolving social and economic impacts associated with the COVID-19 pandemic on the most recently available industry reports, total mortgage origination volume was higher for 2019 as compared to 2018, due to an increaseU.S. and global economies generally, and in both purchaseparticular on the U.S. housing, real estate and refinance originations. Mortgage originations for home purchases increased 7% in 2019 as compared to 2018, while refinancing activity increased 74% due to declining interest rates. Mortgage insurance penetration in the private mortgage insurance market has gradually increased over the past few years and is generally three to five times higher for purchase originations than for refinancings. In 2019 and 2018,housing finance markets, had a negative effect on our results were favorably impacted by: (i) the strong mortgage origination market, including the elevated volume of refinance originations in 2019, and (ii) increased private mortgage insurance penetration rates for both purchase and refinance originations. These trends resulted in a larger private mortgage insurance market in 2019 as compared to 2018.
Although it is difficult to predict future volumes, the most recently available industry reports currently project the mortgage origination market for 2020 to be lower in comparison to 2019, with purchase loan volume expected to increase, but to be more than offset by a significant decrease in refinancings. We also currently expect the private mortgage insurance market for 2020 to decrease in comparison to 2019, driven by a decrease in refinance originations. Based on current industry forecastsbusiness and our projections,financial results for the second quarter of 2020, and to a lesser extent the second half of 2020, and could continue to adversely impact our business and results of operations in future periods. Despite the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, we expect ourwrote record levels of NIW in 2020 and believe that the long-term housing
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
market fundamentals and outlook remain positive, including low interest rates, demographics supporting growth in the population of first-time homebuyers and a relatively constrained supply of homes available for sale. However, the economic impact of the pandemic as well as public and private sector initiatives to be approximately $60 billion.reduce the transmission of COVID-19, such as social distancing and the imposition of restrictions on business activities, have affected and we expect will continue in the near term to affect, among other things: (i) the number of defaults that, over time, will result in claims that we must pay; (ii) the number of mortgages we have insured that will default; and (iii) the number of real estate transactions available for our services. See “—COVID-19 Impacts” below for further discussion of the impacts on our business associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including the effects of low interest rates on our mortgage insurance and investment portfolios. Further, beginning in March 2020, the market volatility stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic caused a temporary disruption in the market for reinsurance, including new mortgage insurance-linked notes transactions. While Radian Guaranty and other private mortgage insurers completed new insurance-linked notes transactions during the second half of 2020, those transactions were on less favorable terms than similar reinsurance transactions executed prior to the pandemic.
Our ServicesReal Estate business, comprising real estate title and mortgagetitle services, is largely a transactional business that depends on the level of customer activity and may be sensitive to changes in macro-level home sales, home prices,mortgage volumes, interest rates, homemortgage default rates and GSE guidelines. In addition, demand for our title services may be impacted by general marketplace competition in the real estate title industry, coupled with housing and mortgage banking relatedmarket conditions such as new home sales, the sizes of the real estate purchase and refinance markets and interest rate fluctuations. See “Item 1. Business—Services—ServicesReal Estate—Real Estate Business Overview” and Notes 41 and 74 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the ServicesReal Estate segment.
PMIERs. In order to be eligible to insure loans purchased by the GSEs, mortgage insurers such as Radian Guaranty must meet the GSEs’ eligibility requirements, or PMIERs. The GSEs have significant discretion under the PMIERs and may amend the PMIERs at any time. The most recent revisionsFor further discussion of the PMIERs eligibility and other requirements, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our PMIERs Minimum Required Assets and the COVID-19 Amendment to the PMIERs, or PMIERs 2.0, became effective on March 31, 2019. Radian Guaranty currently is an approved mortgage insurer under the PMIERs. Seesee “Item 1. Business—Regulation—GSE Requirements,” “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Mortgage Insurance”Mortgage” and Note 1816 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
COVID-19 Impacts
The COVID-19 pandemic has created periods of significant economic disruption, high unemployment, volatility and disruption in financial markets, and required adjustments in the housing finance system and real estate markets. In addition, the pandemic has resulted in travel restrictions, temporary business shutdowns, and stay-at-home, quarantine, and similar orders, and even as some businesses have been reopened, numerous operating limitations such as social distancing and extensive health and safety measures have limited operations, all of which contributed to the rapid and significant rise in unemployment. Although unemployment declined in the second half of 2020, it remains elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels, and may remain elevated or may rise if the current economic disruption is prolonged.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the economy, including the significant increase in unemployment, we have experienced a material increase in new defaults, substantially all related to defaults of loans subject to forbearance programs implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in the number of new mortgage defaults resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative effect on our results of operations for the second quarter of 2020, and to a lesser extent the second half of 2020. This negative impact could continue in future quarters, primarily due to the need to increase our reserve for losses related to the volume of new defaults. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the reserving methodology for the mortgage insurance industry.
As a result of this material increase in new defaults, our primary default rate increased from 2.0% at December 31, 2019 to 5.2% at December 31, 2020, which is down from a peak of 6.5% at June 30, 2020. Favorable trends in the number of new defaults and Cures were the primary drivers of the decline in our default inventory and default rate in the second half of 2020, compared to June 30, 2020. As a result of these favorable trends in new defaults and Cures and assuming continued economic recovery, we currently expect our primary default rate to remain below 6%. However, the number, timing and duration of new defaults and, in turn, the number of defaults that ultimately result in claims will depend on a variety of factors, including the scope, severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, the resulting impact on the economy, including with respect to unemployment and housing prices, and the effectiveness of forbearance and other government efforts such as financial stimulus programs, to provide economic and individual relief to assist homeowners. Consequently, the number and rate of total defaults is difficult to predict and will depend on the foregoing and other factors, including the number and timing of Cures and claims paid and the net impact on IIF from our Persistency Rate and future NIW. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for additional discussion of these factors and other risks and uncertainties.
The increase in new defaults resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic may also affect our ability to remain compliant with the PMIERs financial requirements. Our Master Policies generally provide that a default occurs when a borrower misses one monthly payment, regardless of why the payment was missed, including if the payment was deferred under a forbearance program. Once two missed payments have occurred, the PMIERs characterize a loan as “non-performing” and require us to establish an increased Minimum Required Asset factor for that loan regardless of the reason for the missed payments. Pursuant to the COVID-19 Amendment that temporarily amends the PMIERs, a Disaster Related Capital Charge that effectively reduces the
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Minimum Required Asset factor by 70% is now applied nationwide to all COVID-19 Defaulted Loans for no longer than three calendar months beginning with the month the loan becomes non-performing (i.e., missed two monthly payments), or if greater, the period of time that the loan is subject to a forbearance plan, repayment plan or loan modification trial period granted in response to a financial hardship related to COVID-19. The current broad-based application of the Disaster Related Capital Charge has significantly reduced the total amount of assets that Radian Guaranty otherwise would be required to hold against COVID-19 Defaulted Loans under the PMIERs. Nonetheless, since March 31, 2020, the overall volume of new defaults resulting from the pandemic, even after giving effect to the Disaster Related Capital Charge, resulted in an increase in Radian Guaranty’s Minimum Required Assets and negatively impacted Radian Guaranty’s PMIERs Cushion as of December 31, 2020. While we expect Radian Guaranty to continue to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, there are possible scenarios in which the projected increase in new defaults could impact Radian Guaranty’s ability to comply with the PMIERs financial requirements. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity.”
Further, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the government stimulus efforts in response to the pandemic, has resulted in a historically low interest rate environment. As discussed above, this low interest rate environment contributed to strong NIW volume in 2020, including from continued elevated levels of refinance activity. However, mortgage prepayment speeds also impact the ultimate profitability of our mortgage insurance business. The increase in policy cancellations associated with the high level of refinance activity during 2020 has reduced our Persistency Rate, and in turn, limited the growth of our IIF, which is one of the primary drivers of future premiums that we expect to earn over time. If refinance activity remains elevated, resulting in earlier than anticipated loan prepayments, it could result in a decrease in our future revenues, particularly from our Recurring Premium Policies. The low interest rate environment also affected the performance of our investment portfolio, resulting in an increase in our unrealized gains on investments beginning with the second quarter of 2020, and we expect it will result in the recognition of lower net investment income in future periods if the current low interest rate environment persists and we must reinvest cash flows in lower yielding securities. In addition, the negative impacts to the global economy could result in increased defaults on corporate bonds and other financial instruments, which could increase the frequency and severity of impairments in our investment portfolio. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.information about our investments.
As further described in this report, although we are uncertain of the potential magnitude or duration of the business and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, we believe the resulting increased financial requirements under the PMIERs, reduced Persistency Rates due to a low interest rate environment and increased reserves for losses due to higher new defaults could continue to negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our businesses will depend on, among other things: the extent and duration of the pandemic, the severity of and number of people infected with the virus and the widespread availability of effective anti-viral treatments and vaccines, especially as new strains of COVID-19 have been discovered; the wider economic effects of the pandemic and the scope and duration of governmental and other third-party measures restricting day-to-day life and business operations; the impact of economic stimulus efforts to support the economy through the pandemic; and governmental and GSE programs implemented to assist borrowers experiencing a COVID-19-related hardship, including forbearance programs and suspensions of foreclosures and evictions. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted us, and its ultimate impact on our business and financial results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic.”
CompetitionIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we raised additional capital, temporarily suspended purchases under our share repurchase program, aligned our business with the temporary origination and servicing guidelines announced by the GSEs, and made adjustments to our pricing and our underwriting guidelines to account for the increased risk and uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we have taken a number of actions to focus on protecting and supporting our workforce, while continuing to serve our customers with excellence and support our communities. We have activated our business continuity program by transitioning to a work-from-home virtual workforce model with certain essential activities supported by limited staff in office environments that comply with CDC guidelines and applicable state and local requirements. In order to support our communities during this unprecedented time, we have, among other things, pledged financial support to certain charitable organizations focused on assisting first responders, health care workers and their families. Further actions to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and comply with governmental regulations and government and GSE programs adopted in response to the pandemic may be necessary as conditions continue to evolve.
InDespite the risks and uncertainties posed by COVID-19, we believe that the steps we have taken in recent years, such as improving our debt maturity profile, enhancing our financial flexibility, implementing greater risk-based granularity into our pricing methodologies and increasing our use of risk distribution strategies to lower the risk profile and financial volatility of our mortgage insurance portfolio, has helped position the Company to better withstand the negative effects from macroeconomic stresses associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, which may continue in future periods.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Key Factors Affecting Our Results
Mortgage
Our Mortgage segment provides credit-related insurance coverage, principally through private mortgage insurance issued nationwide, as well as other credit risk management and contract underwriting solutions, to mortgage lending institutions and mortgage credit investors. The following sections discuss certain key drivers affecting our Mortgage revenue, as well as other key factors affecting our results.
IIF and Related Drivers
Our IIF is one of the primary drivers of our future premiums that we expect to earn over time. Although not reflected in the current period financial statements, nor in our reported book value, we expect our IIF to generate substantial earnings in future periods, due to the high credit quality of our current mortgage insurance portfolio and expected Persistency Rate over multiple years.
Based on the composition of our mortgage insurance portfolio, with Monthly Premium Policies comprising a larger proportion of our total portfolio than Single Premium Policies, an increase or decrease in IIF generally has a corresponding impact on premiums earned. Cancellations of our insurance policies as a result of prepayments and other reductions of IIF, such as Rescissions of coverage and claims paid, generally have a negative effect on premiums earned over time. See “Mortgage Insurance Portfolio—Insurance and Risk in Force” for more information about the levels and characteristics of our IIF.
The ultimate profitability of our mortgage insurance business is affected by the impact of mortgage prepayment speeds on the mix of business we write. The measure for assessing the impact of policy cancellations on our primary competitors includeIIF is our Persistency Rate, defined as the percentage of IIF that remains in force over a period of time. Assuming all other factors remain constant, over the life of the policies, prepayment speeds have an inverse impact on IIF and the expected revenue from our Monthly Premium Policies. Slower loan prepayment speeds, demonstrated by a higher Persistency Rate, result in more IIF remaining in place, providing increased revenue from Monthly Premium Policies over time as premium payments continue. Earlier than anticipated loan prepayments, demonstrated by a lower Persistency Rate, reduce IIF and the revenue from our Monthly Premium Policies. Among other factors, prepayment speeds may be affected by changes in interest rates and other macroeconomic factors. A rising interest rate environment generally will reduce refinancing activity and result in lower prepayments, whereas a declining interest rate environment generally will increase the level of refinancing activity and therefore increase prepayments.
In contrast to Monthly Premium Policies, when Single Premium Policies are cancelled by the insured because the loan has been paid off or otherwise, we accelerate the recognition of any remaining unearned premiums, net of any refunds that may be owed to the borrower. Although these cancellations reduce IIF, assuming all other factors remain constant, the profitability of our Single Premium business increases when Persistency Rates are lower. As a result, we believe that writing a mix of Single Premium Policies and Monthly Premium Policies has the potential to moderate the overall impact on our results if actual prepayment speeds are significantly different from expectations. However, the impact of this moderating effect may be affected by the amount of reinsurance we obtain on portions of our portfolio, with the Single Premium QSR Program currently reducing the proportion of retained Single Premium Policies in our portfolio.
NIW and Related Drivers
NIW increases our IIF and our premiums written and earned. NIW is affected by the overall size of the mortgage origination market, the penetration percentage of private mortgage insurance into the overall mortgage origination market and our market share of the private mortgage insurance market. The overall mortgage origination market is influenced by macroeconomic factors such as household formation, household composition, home affordability, interest rates, housing markets in general, credit availability and the impact of various legislative and regulatory actions that may influence the housing and mortgage finance industries. The penetration percentage of private mortgage insurance is mainly influenced by: (i) the competitiveness of private mortgage insurance for GSE conforming loans compared to FHA and VA insured loans and (ii) the relative percentage of mortgage originations that are for purchased homes versus refinances. We believe, for example, that better execution for borrowers with higher FICO scores, lender preference and the inability to cancel FHA insurance for certain loans are factors that continue to provide a competitive advantage for private mortgage insurers. See “Mortgage Insurance Portfolio—New Insurance Written.”
Private mortgage insurance penetration in the insurable market has generally been significantly higher on new mortgages for purchased homes than on the refinance of existing mortgages, because average LTVs are typically higher on home purchases and therefore these lower down payment loans are more likely to require mortgage insurance. Radian Guaranty’s share of the private mortgage insurance market is influenced by competition in that market. See “Item 1. Business—Competition.”
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following charts provide a historical perspective on certain key market drivers, including:
■the mortgage origination volume from home purchases and refinancings; and
■private mortgage insurance penetration as a percentage of the mortgage origination market.
| | |
Mortgage Origination Market (1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Origination Market ($ in billions) | Q1
2018 | Q2
2018 | Q3
2018 | Q4
2018 | Q1
2019 | Q2
2019 | Q3
2019 | Q4
2019 | Q1
2020 | Q2
2020 | Q3
2020 | Q4
2020 |
| ¢ | Refinance | $151 | $130 | $119 | $110 | $120 | $193 | $350 | $435 | $392 | $660 | $735 | $779 |
| ¢ | Purchase | $233 | $344 | $339 | $278 | $230 | $365 | $371 | $319 | $272 | $339 | $443 | $429 |
| Total | $384 | $474 | $458 | $388 | $350 | $558 | $721 | $754 | $664 | $999 | $1,178 | $1,208 |
| | |
Private Mortgage Insurance Penetration into Mortgage Origination Market (1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Market Penetration (%) | Q1
2018 | Q2
2018 | Q3
2018 | Q4
2018 | Q1
2019 | Q2
2019 | Q3
2019 | Q4
2019 | Q1
2020 | Q2
2020 | Q3
2020 | Q4
2020 |
| ò | Purchase (2) | 22.0% | 22.0% | 23.3% | 23.5% | 23.5% | 23.2% | 25.1% | 24.1% | 23.7% | 25.3% | 28.3% | 27.9% |
| ò | Overall (2) | 15.2% | 16.9% | 18.2% | 17.9% | 17.0% | 17.3% | 16.4% | 14.5% | 14.2% | 14.8% | 15.3% | 14.7% |
| ò | Refinance (2) | 4.7% | 3.6% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 4.6% | 6.1% | 7.1% | 7.5% | 7.6% | 9.4% | 7.5% | 7.4% |
(1)Based on actual dollars generated in the credit enhanced market, as reported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and industry publicly reported information. Mortgage originations are based upon the average of originations reported by the Mortgage Bankers Association, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in their most recent published industry reports.
(2)Excluding originations under HARP.
Premiums
The premium rates we charge for our insurance are based on a number of borrower, loan and property characteristics. The mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive and private mortgage insurers and governmental agencies, principally the FHA and the VA. We compete with each other private mortgage insurers on the basis of price, underwriting guidelines, overall service, customer relationships, perceived financial strength (including based on comparative financial strength credit ratings) and reputation, as well as the breadth and quality of the services offered through our Services business that complement our mortgage insurance products. We compete with the FHA and VA primarily on the basis of loan limits, pricing, credit guidelines, terms of our insurance policieswith respect to price and loss mitigation practices. For additional information, see “Item 1. Business—Mortgage Insurance—Competition.”
Pricing is highly competitive in the mortgage insurance industry. During 2019,other factors. We expect price competition to continue throughout the mortgage insurance industry hasand future price changes from private mortgage insurers or the FHA could impact our future premium rates or our ability to compete.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our pricing is risk-based and is intended to generally align with the capital requirements under the PMIERs, while considering pricing trends within the private mortgage insurance industry. As a result, our pricing is expected to generate relatively consistent returns across the credit spectrum and to provide relatively stable expected loss ratios regardless of further credit expansion or contraction. In developing our strategies, we monitor various competitive and economic factors while seeking to enhance the long-term value of our portfolio by balancing credit risk, profitability and volume considerations, and aim to achieve an overall risk-adjusted rate of return on capital given our modeled performance expectations. We continued to shiftgenerate strong NIW in 2020, while at the same time maintaining projected returns on NIW within our targeted ranges.
Our pricing actions gradually affect our results over time, as existing IIF cancels and is replaced with NIW at current pricing. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Mortgage” and “Mortgage Insurance Portfolio—New Insurance Written” for additional information.
As described above, premiums on our mortgage insurance products are generally paid either on an installment basis, pursuant to Monthly Premium Policies, or in a single payment at the time of loan origination, pursuant to Single Premium Policies. See “Item 1. Business—Mortgage—Pricing—Primary Mortgage Insurance Premiums.” Our expected premium yield on our Single Premium Policies is lower than on our Monthly Premium Policies because our premium rates for the life of the policy are generally lower for our Single Premium Policies. However, as discussed above, the ultimate profitability of Single Premium Policies may be higher or lower than expected due to the impact of prepayment speeds. See “—IIF and Related Drivers” above.
Our actual portfolio returns will depend on a number of factors, including economic conditions, the mix of NIW that we are able to write, our pricing, environment where a varietythe amount of pricing methodologies and pricing levels are being deployed with differing degrees of risk-based granularity. The shift away from a predominately rate card-based pricing modelreinsurance we use and the increaselevel of capital required under the PMIERs financial requirements.
Approximately 74.6% of the loans in “black box”our total Primary Mortgage Insurance portfolio at December 31, 2020 are Monthly Premium Policies that provide a level monthly premium for the first 10 years of the policy, followed by a reduced level monthly premium thereafter. For loans that have been refinanced under HARP, the initial 10-year period is reset. Due to the borrower’s ability to cancel the policy generally when the LTV reaches 80% of the original value, and other pricing frameworks providesthe automatic cancellation of the policy on the date the LTV is scheduled to reach 78% of the original value, the volume of loans that remain insured after 10 years and would be subject to the premium reset is generally not material in relation to the total loans originated. However, to the extent the volume of loans resetting from year to year varies significantly, the trend in earned premiums may also vary.
Losses
Incurred losses represent the estimated future claim payments on newly defaulted insured loans as well as any change in our claim estimates for existing defaults, including changes in the estimates we use to determine our expected losses, and estimates with respect to the frequency, magnitude and timing of anticipated losses on defaulted loans. Other factors influencing incurred losses include:
■The mix of credit characteristics in our total direct RIF (e.g., loans with higher risk characteristics, or loans with layered risk that combine multiple higher-risk attributes within the same loan, generally result in more delinquencies and claims). See “Mortgage Insurance Portfolio—Insurance and Risk in Force.”
■The average loan size (relatively higher priced properties with larger average loan amounts may result in higher incurred losses).
■The percentage of coverage on insured loans (higher percentages of insurance coverage generally correlate with higher incurred losses) and the presence of structural mitigants such as deductibles or stop losses.
■Changes in housing values (declines in housing values generally make it more difficult for borrowers to sell a more dynamic pricing capability that allowshome to avoid default or for more frequent pricing changes throughoutthe property to be sold to mitigate a claim, and also may negatively affect a borrower’s willingness to continue to make mortgage payments when the home value is less than the mortgage balance; conversely, increases in housing values tend to reduce the level of defaults as well as make it more likely that foreclosures will result in the loan being satisfied).
■The distribution of claims over the life cycle of a portfolio (historically, claims are relatively low during the first two years after a loan is originated and then increase over a period of several years before declining; however, several factors can impact and change this cycle, including the economic environment, the quality of the underwriting of the loan, characteristics of the mortgage loan, the credit profile of the borrower, housing prices and unemployment rates).
■Our ability to mitigate potential losses through Rescissions, Claim Denials, cancellations and Claim Curtailments on claims submitted to us. These actions all reduce our incurred losses. However, if these Loss Mitigation Activities are successfully challenged at rates that are higher than expected or we agree to settle disputes related to our Loss Mitigation Activities, our incurred losses will increase. We may enter into specific agreements that govern activities such as claims decisions, claim payments, Loss Mitigation Activities and insurance industry.coverage. As our portfolio originated prior to and including 2008 has become a smaller percentage of our overall insured portfolio, there has been a decrease in the amount of Loss Mitigation Activity with respect to the claims we receive, and we expect this trend to continue, particularly given the limitations on our Loss Mitigation Activities imposed in both the 2014 Master Policy and 2020 Master Policy. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Loss Mitigation Activities and “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Loss Mitigation Activity is not expected to mitigate mortgage insurance losses to the same extent as in prior years; Loss Mitigation Activity could continue to negatively impact our customer relationships.”
Risk Distribution
In recent years, participantsWe use third-party reinsurance in the private mortgage insurance industry have engaged in a range of risk distribution strategies. In our mortgage insurance business we use reinsurance as ato manage capital and risk management toolin an effort to loweroptimize the amounts and types of capital and risk profiledistribution deployed against insured risk. See “—IIF and financial volatility ofRelated Drivers” above. Currently, we distribute risk in our mortgage insurance portfolio through economic cycles. We have distributed risk through third-party quota share and excess-of-loss reinsurance programs.
When we enter into a quota share reinsurance agreement, the reinsurer receives a premium and, in exchange, agrees to insure an agreed upon portion of incurred losses. These arrangements reduce our earned premiums but also reduce our net RIF, which provides capital relief, including under the PMIERs financial requirements. Our incurred losses are reduced by any incurred losses ceded in accordance with the reinsurance agreement, and we often receive ceding commissions from the reinsurer as part of the transaction, which, in turn, reduce our reported operating expenses and policy acquisition costs.
Our Excess-of-Loss Program accesses the capital markets (through the Eagle Re Issuers, VIEs funded by mortgage insurance-linked notes), as well as through the capitalreinsurance markets by using mortgage insurance-linked notes transactions. Among other benefits, risk distributiondirectly (through separate excess-of-loss reinsurance with a third-party reinsurer). Our Excess-of-Loss Program reduces our required capital, lowersearned premiums, but also reduces our overall
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussionnet RIF, PMIERs financial requirements and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
cost of capital and enhances our projected return on capital. Risk distribution may also provide additional claims paying resources and increase our strength as a counterparty. Asincurred losses, which are allocated in accordance with the industry continues to evolve from a model where private mortgage insurers “originate and hold” risk to an “aggregate, manage and distribute” risk model, we expect to continue to leverage multiple forms of risk distribution. After considerationstructure of the transaction. The Eagle Re 2020-1 insurance-linked notes transactionIssuers are special purpose VIEs that was completedare not consolidated in earlyour consolidated financial statements because we do not have the unilateral power to direct those activities that are significant to their economic performance.
As of December 31, 2020, 72%66% of our primary RIF as of December 31, 2019 is subject to a form of risk distribution.
Key Factors Affecting Our Results
Mortgage Insurance
Our Mortgage Insurance segment provides credit-related insurance coverage, principally through private mortgage insurance, as well as other credit risk management solutions,distribution and our estimated reinsurance recoverables related to mortgage lending institutions and mortgage credit investors nationwide. The following sections discuss certain key drivers affecting our Mortgage Insurance revenue, as well as other key factors affecting our results.
| |
• | IIF; Persistency Rate; Mix of Business. Our IIF is one of the primary drivers of our future premiums that we expect to earn over time. Although not reflected in the current period financial statements, nor in our reported book value, we expect our IIF to generate substantial earnings in future periods, due to the high credit quality of our current mortgage insurance portfolio and expected Persistency Rate over multiple years.
|
Based on the composition of our mortgage insurance portfolio with Monthly Premium Policies comprising a larger proportionwas $71.8 million. See Note 8 of our total portfolio than Single Premium Policies, an increase or decrease in IIF generally has a corresponding impact on premiums earned. Cancellations of our insurance policies as a result of prepayments and other reductions of IIF, such as Rescissions of coverage and claims paid, generally have a negative effect on premiums earned. See “Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—NIW, IIF, RIF”Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our reinsurance arrangements, including the levelstotal assets and characteristicsliabilities of the Eagle Re Issuers.
Investment Income
Investment income is determined primarily by the investment balances held and the average yield on our overall investment portfolio.
Other Operating Expenses
Our other operating expenses are affected by the amount of our NIW, IIF and RIF.
The ultimate profitabilityas well as the amount of our mortgage insurance business isIIF. Our other operating expenses may also be affected by the impact of mortgage prepayment speedsperformance on our incentive compensation programs, as a result of our pay-for-performance approach to compensation that is based on the mix of business we write. The measure for assessing the impact of policy cancellations on our IIF is our Persistency Rate, defined as the percentage of IIF that remains in force over a period of time. Assuming all other factors remain constant, over the life of the policies, prepayment speeds have an inverse impact on IIF and the expected revenue from our Monthly Premium Policies. Slower loan prepayment speeds, demonstrated by a higher Persistency Rate, result in more IIF remaining in place, providing increased revenue from Monthly Premium Policies over time as premium payments continue. Earlier than anticipated loan prepayments, demonstrated by a lower Persistency Rate, reduce IIF and the revenue from our Monthly Premium Policies. Among other factors, prepayment speeds may be affected by changes in interest rates and other macroeconomic factors. A rising interest rate environment generally will reduce refinancing activity and result in lower prepayments, whereas a declining interest rate environment generally will increase the level of refinancing activityachievement of both short-term and therefore increase prepayments.long-term goals.
In contrast to Monthly Premium Policies, when Single Premium Policies are cancelled by the insured because the loan has been paid off or otherwise, we accelerate the recognition of any remaining unearned premiums, net of any refunds that may be owed to the borrower. Although these cancellations reduce IIF, assuming all other factors remain constant, the profitability of our Single Premium business increases when Persistency Rates are lower. As a result, we believe that writing a mix of Single Premium Policies and Monthly Premium Policies has the potential to moderate the overall impact on our results if actual prepayment speeds are significantly different from expectations. However, the impact of this moderating effect may be affected by the amount of reinsurance we obtain on portions of our portfolio, with the Single Premium QSR Program currently reducing the proportion of retained Single Premium Policies in our portfolio.
| |
• | NIW; Origination Market; Penetration Rate. NIW increases our IIF and our premiums written and earned. NIW is affected by the overall size of the mortgage origination market, the penetration percentage of private mortgage insurance into the overall mortgage origination market and our market share of the private mortgage insurance market. The overall mortgage origination market is influenced by macroeconomic factors such as household formation, household composition, home affordability, interest rates, housing markets in general, credit availability and the impact of various legislative and regulatory actions that may influence the housing and mortgage finance industries. The penetration percentage of private mortgage insurance is mainly influenced by: (i) the competitiveness of private mortgage insurance for GSE conforming loans compared to FHA and VA insured loans and (ii) the relative percentage of mortgage originations that are for purchased homes versus refinances. We
|
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
believe, for example, that better execution for borrowers with higher FICO scores, lender preference and the inability to cancel FHA insurance for certain loans are factors that continue to provide a competitive advantage for private mortgage insurers. See “Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—NIW, IIF, RIF.”
Private mortgage insurance penetration in the insurable market has generally been significantly higher on new mortgages for purchased homes than on the refinance of existing mortgages, because average LTVs are typically higher on home purchases and therefore these low down payment loans are more likely to require mortgage insurance. Radian Guaranty’s share of the private mortgage insurance market is influenced by competition in that market. See “Item 1. Business—Mortgage Insurance—Competition” and “Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—NIW, IIF, RIF.”
The following charts provide a historical perspective on certain key market drivers, including:
| |
◦ | the mortgage origination volume from home purchases and refinancings; |
| |
◦ | private mortgage insurance penetration as a percentage of the mortgage origination market; and |
| |
◦ | the composition of the insured mortgage market between private mortgage insurance and FHA insurance. |
______________________
| |
(1) | Based on actual dollars generated in the credit enhanced market, as reported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and industry publicly reported information. Mortgage originations are based upon the average of originations reported by the Mortgage Bankers Association, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in their most recent published industry reports. |
| |
(2) | Excluding originations under HARP. |
| |
• | Premiums. The premium rates we charge for our insurance are based on a number of borrower, loan and property characteristics. The mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive and private mortgage insurers compete with each other and with the FHA and VA with respect to price and other factors. We expect price competition to
|
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
continue throughout the mortgage insurance industry and future price changes from private mortgage insurers or the FHA could impact our future premium rates or our ability to compete.Real Estate
Our pricing is risk-based and is intended to generally align with the capital requirements under the PMIERs, while considering pricing trends within the private mortgage insurance industry. As a result, our pricing is expected to generate relatively consistent returns across the credit spectrum and to provide relatively stable expected loss ratios regardless of further credit expansion or contraction. In developing our strategies, we monitor various competitive and economic factors while seeking to enhance the long-term value of our portfolio by balancing credit risk, profitability and volume considerations, and aim to achieve an overall risk-adjusted rate of return on capital given our modeled performance expectations. We continued to generate strong NIW in 2019, and believe we remain well positioned to compete for the NIW being originated today, while at the same time maintaining projected returns on NIW within our targeted ranges.
Our pricing actions gradually affect our results over time, as existing IIF cancels and is replaced with NIW at current pricing. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Mortgage Insurance” and “Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—NIW, IIF, RIF” for additional information.
Premiums on our mortgage insurance products are generally paid either on an installment basis or in a single payment at the time of loan origination. See “Item 1. Business—Mortgage Insurance—Mortgage Insurance Business Overview—Premium Rates—Primary Mortgage Insurance.” Our expected premium yield on our Single Premium Policies is lower than on our Monthly Premium Policies because our premium rates are generally lower for our Single Premium Policies. However, as discussed above, the ultimate profitability of Single Premium Policies may be higher or lower than expected due to the level of prepayments. See “—IIF; Persistency Rate; Mix of Business” above.
Our actual portfolio returns will depend on a number of factors, including economic conditions, the mix of NIW that we are able to write, our pricing, the amount of reinsurance we use and the level of capital required under the PMIERs financial requirements.
Approximately 69% of the loans in our total primary mortgage insurance portfolio at December 31, 2019 are Monthly Premium Policies that provide a level monthly premium for the first 10 years of the policy, followed by a reduced level monthly premium thereafter. For loans that have been refinanced under HARP or HARP Replacement Programs, the initial 10-year period is reset. Due to the borrower’s ability to cancel the policy generally when the LTV reaches 80% of the original value, and the automatic cancellation of the policy on the date the LTV is scheduled to reach 78% of the original value, the volume of loans that remain insured after 10 years and would be subject to the premium reset is generally not material in relation to the total loans originated. However, to the extent the volume of loans resetting from year to year varies significantly, the trend in earned premiums may also vary.
| |
• | Losses. Incurred losses represent the estimated future claim payments on newly defaulted insured loans as well as any change in our claim estimates for existing defaults, including changes in the estimates we use to determine our expected losses, and estimates with respect to the frequency, magnitude and timing of anticipated losses on defaulted loans. Other factors influencing incurred losses include:
|
| |
◦ | The mix of credit characteristics in our total direct RIF (e.g., loans with higher risk characteristics, or loans with layered risk that combine multiple higher-risk attributes within the same loan, generally result in more delinquencies and claims). See “Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—NIW, IIF, RIF.”
|
| |
◦ | The average loan size (relatively higher priced properties with larger average loan amounts may result in higher incurred losses). |
| |
◦ | The percentage of coverage on insured loans (higher percentages of insurance coverage generally correlate with higher incurred losses) and the presence of structural mitigants such as deductibles or stop losses. |
| |
◦ | Changes in housing values (declines in housing values generally make it more difficult for borrowers to sell a home to avoid default or for the property to be sold to mitigate a claim, and also may negatively affect a borrower’s willingness to continue to make mortgage payments when the home value is less than the mortgage balance; conversely, increases in housing values tend to reduce the level of defaults as well as make it more likely that foreclosures will result in the loan being satisfied). |
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| |
◦ | The distribution of claims over the life cycle of a portfolio (historically, claims are relatively low during the first two years after a loan is originated and then increase over a period of several years before declining; however, several factors can impact and change this cycle, including the economic environment, the quality of the underwriting of the loan, characteristics of the mortgage loan, the credit profile of the borrower, housing prices and unemployment rates). |
| |
◦ | Our ability to mitigate potential losses through Rescissions, Claim Denials, cancellations and Claim Curtailments on claims submitted to us. These actions all reduce our incurred losses. However, if these Loss Mitigation Activities are successfully challenged at rates that are higher than expected or we agree to settle disputes related to our Loss Mitigation Activities, our incurred losses will increase. We may enter into specific agreements that govern activities such as claims decisions, claim payments, Loss Mitigation Activities and insurance coverage. As our portfolio originated prior to and including 2008 has become a smaller percentage of our overall insured portfolio, there has been a decrease in the amount of Loss Mitigation Activity with respect to the claims we receive, and we expect this trend to continue, particularly given the limitations on our Loss Mitigation Activities imposed in the 2014 Master Policy and the additional clarifications that will be effective under our new 2020 Master Policy. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Loss Mitigation Activities and “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our Loss Mitigation Activity is not expected to mitigate mortgage insurance losses to the same extent as in prior years; Loss Mitigation Activity could continue to negatively impact our customer relationships.”
|
| |
• | Other Operating Expenses. Our other operating expenses are affected by the amount of our NIW, as well as the amount of IIF. Our other operating expenses may also be affected by the impact of performance on our incentive compensation programs, as a result of our pay-for-performance approach to compensation that is based on the level of achievement of both short-term and long-term goals.
|
| |
• | Risk Distribution. We use third-party reinsurance in our mortgage insurance business to manage capital and risk in an effort to optimize the amounts and types of capital and risk distribution deployed against insured risk. See “—IIF; Persistency Rate; Mix of Business” above. Currently, we distribute risk in our mortgage insurance portfolio through quota share and excess-of-loss reinsurance programs. When we enter into a quota share reinsurance agreement, the reinsurer receives a premium and, in exchange, agrees to insure an agreed upon portion of incurred losses. These arrangements reduce our earned premiums but also reduce our net RIF, which provides capital relief, including under the PMIERs financial requirements. Our incurred losses are reduced by any incurred losses ceded in accordance with the reinsurance agreement, and we often receive ceding commissions from the reinsurer as part of the transaction, which, in turn, reduce our reported operating expenses and policy acquisition costs. Our Excess-of-Loss Program accesses the capital markets (through a VIE funded by mortgage insurance-linked notes), as well as the reinsurance markets directly (through separate excess-of-loss reinsurance with a third-party reinsurer). Our Excess-of-Loss Program reduces our net RIF and our incurred losses are reduced by any incurred losses allocated in accordance with the structure of the transaction. While these reinsurance arrangements have the impact of reducing our earned premiums, they also provide capital relief, including under the PMIERs financial requirements. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our reinsurance arrangements.
|
| |
• | Investment Income. Investment income is determined primarily by the investment balances held and the average yield on our overall investment portfolio.
|
Services
Our ServicesReal Estate segment offers a broad array of real estate, titleproducts and mortgage services to market participants across the mortgage and real estate value chain. See “Item 1. Business—Services—ServicesReal Estate—Real Estate Business Overview” and Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Services segment and the January 2020 sale of Clayton.Real Estate segment.
In contrast to our mortgage insuranceMortgage business, the ServicesReal Estate segment is primarily a fee-for-service business without significant balance sheet risk. Key factors impacting results for our Real Estate business include the following items.
Premiums
We earn net premiums on title insurance through Radian Title Insurance. Demand for our title services may be impacted by general marketplace competition in the real estate title industry, coupled with housing market related conditions such as new home sales, the sizes of the real estate purchase and refinance markets and interest rate fluctuations.
Services Revenue
Our Real Estate segment is dependent upon overall activity in the mortgage, real estate and mortgage finance markets, as well as the overall health of the related industries. Due, in part, to the transactional nature of the business, include:
| |
• | Services Revenue. Our Services segment is dependent upon overall activity in the mortgage, real estate and mortgage finance markets, as well as the overall healthrevenues for our Real Estate segment are subject to fluctuations from period to period, including seasonal fluctuations that reflect the activities in these markets. Sales volume is also affected by the number of competing companies and alternative products offered in the market. We believe the diversity of the related industries. Due, in part, to the transactional nature of the business, revenues for our Services segment are subject to fluctuations from period to period, including seasonal fluctuations that reflect the activities in these markets. Sales volume is also affected by the number of competing companies and alternative products offered in the market. We believe the diversity of
|
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
services we offer has the potential to produce fee income from the ServicesReal Estate segment throughout various mortgage finance environments, although market conditions can significantly impact the mix and amount of fee income we generate in any particular period. In addition, see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsSee “Item 1. Business—Real Estate—Real Estate Business Overview” for more information on revenue recognition policies for our Services segment.Real Estate services.
The ServicesReal Estate segment is dependent on a limited number of large customers that represent a significant portion of its revenues. An unexpected loss of a major customer could significantly impact the level of ServicesReal Estate revenue. Generally, our
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contracts do not contain volume commitments and may be terminated by clients at any time. Access to Radian Guaranty’s mortgage insurance customer base provides additional opportunities to expand the ServicesReal Estate segment’s existing customers.
Revenue for the Services segment also includes inter-segment revenues from services performed for our Mortgage Insurance segment. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.customers.
Our ServicesReal Estate revenue is primarily generated under fixed-price contracts. Under fixed-price contracts, we agree to perform the specified services and deliverables for a pre-determined per-unit or per-file price or day rate.price. To the extent our actual direct and allocated indirect costs decrease or increase from the estimates upon which the price was negotiated, we will generate more or less profit, respectively, or could incur a loss. See “Item 1. Business—Services—Services Business Overview”Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on revenue recognition policies for our Real Estate segment.
Cost of Services revenue.
| |
• | Cost of Services. Our cost of services is primarily affected by our level of services revenue. Our cost of services primarily consists of employee compensation and related payroll benefits and to a lesser extent, other costs of providing services such as travel and related expenses incurred in providing client services, costs paid to outside vendors, data acquisition costs and other compensation-related expenses to maintain software application platforms that directly support our businesses. The level of these costs may fluctuate if market rates of compensation change, or if there is decreased availability or a loss of qualified employees.Our cost of services is primarily affected by our level of services revenue and the number of employees providing products and services for our Real Estate businesses. Our cost of services primarily consists of employee compensation and related payroll benefits and to a lesser extent, other costs of providing services such as travel and related expenses incurred in providing client services, costs paid to outside vendors, data acquisition costs and other compensation-related expenses to maintain software application platforms that directly support our businesses. The level of these costs may fluctuate if market rates of compensation change, or if there is decreased availability or a loss of qualified employees. Operating Expenses Our operating expenses primarily consist of salaries and benefits not classified as cost of services because they are related to employees, such as sales and corporate employees, who are not directly involved in providing client services. Operating expenses also include other selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation, and allocations of corporate general and administrative expenses. |
| |
• | Premiums. We earn net premiums on title insurance, effective with our acquisition of Radian Title Insurance in the first quarter of 2018. By adding the capabilities of this subsidiary to the title and settlement services that we already were offering through our existing title agency, Radian Settlement Services, we expanded the geographic reach of our title services and are positioned to provide title insurance and settlement services to our customers across the country.
|
| |
• | Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses primarily consist of salaries and benefits not classified as cost of services because they are related to employees, such as sales and corporate employees, who are not directly involved in providing client services. Operating expenses also include other selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation, and allocations of corporate general and administrative expenses.
|
Other Factors Affecting Consolidated Results
TheFor information about our All Other activities that affect our consolidated results, see “Item 1. Business—All Other.” In addition, the following items also may impact our consolidated results in the ordinary course. The items listed are not representative of all potential items impacting our consolidated results. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for additional information on the risks affecting our business.
| |
• | Net Gains (Losses) on Investments and Other Financial Instruments. The recognition of realized investment gains or losses can vary significantly across periods as the activity is highly discretionary based on the timing of individual securities sales due to such factors as market opportunities, our tax and capital profile and overall market cycles. Unrealized gains and losses arise primarily from changes in the market value of our investments that are classified as trading or effective with our implementation of the update to the standard for the accounting of financial instruments effective January 1, 2018, equity securities. These valuation adjustments may not necessarily result in realized economic gains or losses. |
| |
• | Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt and losses incurred to purchase our debt prior to maturity are discretionary activities that are undertaken in order to take advantage of market opportunities to strengthen our financial and capital positions. |
| |
• | Impairment of Goodwill or Other Acquired Intangible Assets. The periodic review of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets for potential impairment may impact consolidated results. Our goodwill and other acquired intangible assets analysis is based on management’s assumptions, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
71
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Mortgage Insurance Portfolio
| | |
Primary Insurance in Force (1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Insurance in Force as of: |
| Vintage written in:
($ in billions) | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 |
| ¢ | 2020 | $98.8 | 40.2 | % | $— | — | % | $— | — | % |
| ¢ | 2019 | 44.6 | 18.1 | | 67.3 | 28.0 | | — | — | |
| ¢ | 2018 | 23.5 | 9.5 | | 42.9 | 17.8 | | 54.6 | 24.6 | |
| ¢ | 2017 | 21.2 | 8.6 | | 37.9 | 15.8 | | 47.1 | 21.3 | |
| ¢ | 2016 | 17.5 | 7.1 | | 29.5 | 12.2 | | 37.5 | 17.0 | |
| ¢ | 2009 - 2015 | 25.7 | 10.5 | | 44.0 | 18.3 | | 59.4 | 26.8 | |
| ¢ | 2008 & Prior (2) | 14.8 | 6.0 | | 19.0 | 7.9 | | 22.8 | 10.3 | |
| Total | $246.1 | 100.0 | % | $240.6 | 100.0 | % | $221.4 | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | |
(1)Policy years represent the original policy years, and have not been adjusted to reflect subsequent refinancing activity under HARP.
(2)Adjusted to reflect subsequent refinancing activity under HARP, this percentage would decrease to 3.7%, 4.7%, and 6.0% as of December 31, 2020, December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
New Insurance Written
A key component of our current business strategy is to write profitable NIW while effectively maintaining the portfolio’s health, balance and profitability. Consistent with this objective, we wrote $105.0 billion of primary new mortgage insurance in 2020, compared to $71.3 billion of NIW in 2019. The NIW written on a Flow Basis in 2020 was Radian’s highest volume in its history.
We target a blended return on required capital on new business on an unlevered basis (i.e., after-tax underwriting returns plus projected investment income) between 13-17%. This projected targeted return incorporates the impact of the PMIERs financial requirements and the risk distribution programs we have in place to cover NIW at the time it is originated, such as our Single Premium QSR Program, but does not include the impact of leverage or risk distribution transactions that are executed after the NIW has been originated, such as our Excess-of-Loss Program. Actions we take with respect to pricing and risk on NIW we are writing today are expected to gradually affect our results over time, due to the natural turnover of the mortgage insurance portfolio as existing IIF cancels.
Our 2020 NIW, partially offset by cancellations and amortization within our existing portfolio, resulted in an increase in IIF to $246.1 billion at December 31, 2020, from $240.6 billion at December 31, 2019, as shown in the chart above. Our NIW increased by 47.2% in 2020 as compared to 2019, due to a strong mortgage origination market including higher refinance activity, aided by a historically low interest rate environment, and increased private mortgage insurance penetration rates.
Among other factors, private mortgage insurance industry volumes are impacted by total mortgage origination volumes and the mix between mortgage originations that are for home purchases versus refinancings of existing mortgages, with the penetration rate for private mortgage insurance being generally three to five times higher for purchase transactions than for refinancings. According to industry estimates, total mortgage origination volume was higher in 2020 as compared to 2019, due to a strong purchase market and a significant increase in refinance originations driven largely by lower interest rates. Although it is difficult to project future volumes, recent market projections for 2021 estimate total mortgage originations of approximately three trillion dollars, which would represent a decline in the total mortgage origination market of 20-25%, with a private mortgage insurance market of 450 to 500 billion dollars. This outlook anticipates a significant decrease in refinance originations in the second half of 2021 resulting from expected increases in interest rates. While expectations for refinance volume vary, there is consensus around a large purchase market driven by increased home sales, which is a positive for mortgage insurers given the higher likelihood of purchase loans to utilize private mortgage insurance as compared to a refinance loan. If refinance volume declines we would expect the Persistency Rate for our portfolio to increase, benefiting the growth of our Insurance in Force portfolio. See "Overview—COVID-19 Impacts” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for more information.
We experienced a decrease in our total mix of Single Premium Policies to 12.3% of our NIW for 2020, compared to 16.5% for 2019. Borrower-paid Single Premium Policies were 90.2% of our total direct Single Premium NIW for 2020 compared to
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
86.1% for 2019. We expect our production level for Single Premium Policies to fluctuate over time based on various factors, which include risk/return considerations and market conditions.
The following table provides selected information as of and for the periods indicated related to our mortgage insurance NIW. For direct Single Premium Policies, NIW includes policies written on an individual basis (as each loan is originated) and on an aggregated basis (in which each individual loan in a group of loans is insured in a single transaction, typically after the loans have been originated).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| ($ in millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| NIW | | $ | 105,024 | | | $ | 71,327 | | | $ | 56,547 | |
| Primary risk written | | $ | 24,540 | | | $ | 17,163 | | | $ | 14,264 | |
| Average coverage percentage | | 23.4 | % | | 24.1 | % | | 25.2 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| NIW by loan purpose: | | | | | | |
| Purchases | | 64.8 | % | | 81.1 | % | | 93.8 | % |
| Refinances | | 35.2 | % | | 18.9 | % | | 6.2 | % |
| | | | | | |
| NIW by premium type: | | | | | | |
| Direct Monthly and Other Recurring Premiums | | 87.7 | % | | 83.5 | % | | 78.8 | % |
| Direct single premiums: | | | | | | |
| Borrower-paid | | 11.1 | | | 14.2 | | | 11.9 | |
Lender-paid (1) | | 1.2 | | | 2.3 | | | 9.3 | |
| Total direct single premiums | | 12.3 | | | 16.5 | | | 21.2 | |
| Total | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| Total borrower-paid | | 98.2 | % | | 96.7 | % | | 89.6 | % |
| | | | | | | |
NIW by FICO score (2): | | | | | | |
| >=740 | | 66.0 | % | | 63.3 | % | | 55.6 | % |
| 680-739 | | 30.8 | % | | 31.9 | % | | 35.6 | % |
| 620-679 | | 3.2 | % | | 4.8 | % | | 8.8 | % |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| NIW by LTV: | | | | | | |
| 95.01% and above | | 9.2 | % | | 16.7 | % | | 16.7 | % |
| 90.01% to 95.00% | | 37.1 | % | | 37.7 | % | | 44.4 | % |
| 85.01% to 90.00% | | 29.4 | % | | 28.0 | % | | 27.6 | % |
| 85.00% and below | | 24.3 | % | | 17.6 | % | | 11.3 | % |
| | | | | | |
(1)Lender-paid Single Premium Policies have higher Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs as compared to borrower-paid Single Premium Policies. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—GSE Requirements” for additional information.
(2)For loans with multiple borrowers, the percentage of NIW by FICO score represents the lowest of the borrowers’ FICO scores. Data for 2018 had previously been presented based on the FICO score of the primary borrower and have been restated to reflect the lowest of the borrowers’ FICO scores.
Insurance and Risk in Force
IIF at December 31, 2020 increased 2.3% as compared to the same period last year, reflecting an 11.4% increase in Monthly Premium Policies in force, partially offset by a 20.9% decline in Single Premium Policies in force. As shown in the table below, our Persistency Rate at December 31, 2020 declined as compared to the same period in 2019. Historically, there is a close correlation between interest rates and Persistency Rates. Lower interest rate environments generally increase refinancings, which increase the cancellation rate of our insurance and negatively affect our Persistency Rates. The decline in our Persistency Rate at December 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to increased refinance activity resulting from historically low interest rates, and resulted in an increase in policy cancellations and a net decline in Single Premium Policies in force in particular.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our IIF is the primary driver of the future premiums that we expect to earn over time. Although not reflected in the current period financial statements, nor in our reported book value, we expect our IIF to generate substantial earnings in future periods, due to the high credit quality of our current mortgage insurance portfolio and its expected persistency over multiple years. See “Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage—IIF and Related Drivers” for more information.
Our earnings in future periods are subject to elevated risks and uncertainties due in particular to the potential impact of the unprecedented and continually evolving social and economic impacts associated with the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. and global economies generally, and in particular on the U.S. housing, real estate and housing finance markets. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about the COVID-19 pandemic, which could have a material negative effect on the Company’s business, liquidity, results of operations and financial condition. See “Overview—COVID-19 Impacts” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for additional information.
Historical loan performance data indicates that credit scores and underwriting quality are key drivers of credit performance. As of December 31, 2020, our portfolio of business written subsequent to 2008, including refinancings under HARP, represented approximately 96.3% of our total primary RIF. Loan originations after 2008 have consisted primarily of high credit quality loans with significantly better credit performance than loans originated during 2008 and prior periods. The volume of insurance that we have written on high credit quality loans after 2008 has significantly improved our mortgage insurance portfolio mix. Our actual and expected future losses on our portfolio written after 2008, together with refinancings under HARP, are significantly lower than those experienced on our NIW prior to and including 2008. However, the impact to our future losses from the COVID-19 pandemic, including from recent increases in and elevated levels of unemployment, which may be prolonged, is highly uncertain.
The following table illustrates the trends of our cumulative incurred loss ratios by year of origination and development year.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative Incurred Loss Ratio by Vintage (1) |
| Vintage | Dec
2011 | Dec
2012 | Dec
2013 | Dec
2014 | Dec
2015 | Dec
2016 | Dec
2017 | Dec
2018 | Dec
2019 | Dec 2020 (2) |
| 2011 | 1.7% | 4.4% | 5.5% | 5.6% | 5.0% | 4.9% | 5.0% | 4.9% | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| 2012 | | 2.0% | 3.2% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 3.2% |
| 2013 | | | 2.5% | 4.0% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 3.4% | 3.3% | 4.2% |
| 2014 | | | | 2.7% | 4.1% | 4.9% | 5.0% | 5.1% | 5.2% | 6.9% |
| 2015 | | | | | 2.1% | 4.8% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 4.7% | 7.4% |
| 2016 | | | | | | 2.9% | 5.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 9.7% |
| 2017 | | | | | | | 4.7% | 5.1% | 6.1% | 14.3% |
| 2018 | | | | | | | | 3.0% | 6.4% | 22.8% |
| 2019 | | | | | | | | | 2.8% | 35.6% |
| 2020 | | | | | | | | | | 25.6% |
(1)Represents inception-to-date losses incurred as a percentage of net premiums earned.
(2)Losses incurred in 2020 across all vintages were elevated due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Throughout this report, unless otherwise noted, RIF is presented on a gross basis and includes the amount ceded under reinsurance. NIW, RIF and IIF for direct Single Premium Policies include policies written on an individual basis (as each loan is originated) and on an aggregated basis (in which each individual loan in a group of loans is insured in a single transaction, typically after the loans have been originated).
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following tables provide selected information as of and for the periods indicated related to mortgage insurance IIF and RIF.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| ($ in millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Primary IIF | | $ | 246,144 | | | $ | 240,558 | | | $ | 221,443 | |
| Primary RIF | | $ | 60,656 | | | $ | 60,921 | | | $ | 56,728 | |
| Average coverage percentage | | 24.6 | % | | 25.3 | % | | 25.6 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Total primary RIF on defaulted loans | | $ | 3,250 | | | $ | 1,061 | | | $ | 1,032 | |
| Percentage of RIF in default | | 5.4 | % | | 1.7 | % | | 1.8 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Persistency Rate (12 months ended) | | 61.2 | % | | 78.2 | % | | 83.1 | % |
Persistency Rate (quarterly, annualized) (1) | | 60.4 | % | | 75.0 | % | | 85.5 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Primary RIF by premium type: | | | | | | |
| Direct Monthly and Other Recurring Premiums | | 79.1 | % | | 72.4 | % | | 70.3 | % |
| Direct single premiums: | | | | | | |
| Borrower-paid | | 9.4 | | | 9.1 | | | 7.3 | |
Lender-paid (2) | | 11.5 | | | 18.5 | | | 22.4 | |
| Total direct single premiums | | 20.9 | | | 27.6 | | | 29.7 | |
| Total | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| Total borrower-paid | | 86.3 | % | | 78.9 | % | | 74.5 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Primary RIF by FICO score (3) : | | | | | | |
| >=740 | | 57.5 | % | | 56.9 | % | | 55.1 | % |
| 680-739 | | 34.6 | % | | 34.2 | % | | 34.8 | % |
| 620-679 | | 7.3 | % | | 8.2 | % | | 9.3 | % |
| <=619 | | 0.6 | % | | 0.7 | % | | 0.8 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| Primary RIF by LTV: | | | | | | |
| 95.01% and above | | 14.4 | % | | 14.2 | % | | 11.6 | % |
| 90.01% to 95.00% | | 49.3 | % | | 51.3 | % | | 53.1 | % |
| 85.01% to 90.00% | | 28.0 | % | | 27.9 | % | | 29.0 | % |
| 85.00% and below | | 8.3 | % | | 6.6 | % | | 6.3 | % |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
(1)The Persistency Rate on a quarterly, annualized basis is calculated based on loan-level detail for the quarter ending as of the date shown. It may be impacted by seasonality or other factors, including the level of refinance activity during the applicable periods, and may not be indicative of full-year trends.
(1)Lender-paid Single Premium Policies have higher Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs as compared to borrower-paid Single Premium Policies.
(2)Represents the borrower’s FICO score at origination. For loans with multiple borrowers, the percentage of primary RIF by FICO score represents the lowest of the borrowers’ FICO scores. Data for 2018 had previously been presented based on the FICO score of the primary borrower and have been restated to reflect the lowest of the borrowers’ FICO scores.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following table shows our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF by year of origination and selected information related to that risk as of December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ in millions) | | RIF | | Number of Defaults | | Delinquency Rate | | Percentage of Reserve for Losses | | | | |
| 2008 and prior | | $ | 3,733 | | | 12,046 | | | 12.1 | % | | 26.2 | % | | | | |
| 2009 - 2013 | | 2,678 | | | 2,601 | | | 4.6 | | | 4.7 | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 1,554 | | | 2,180 | | | 6.7 | | | 3.8 | | | | | |
| 2015 | | 2,608 | | | 3,167 | | | 6.3 | | | 5.8 | | | | | |
| 2016 | | 4,616 | | | 5,243 | | | 6.2 | | | 9.6 | | | | | |
| 2017 | | 5,495 | | | 7,652 | | | 7.5 | | | 13.1 | | | | | |
| 2018 | | 5,973 | | | 9,974 | | | 9.0 | | | 16.7 | | | | | |
| 2019 | | 10,832 | | | 9,741 | | | 5.3 | | | 15.5 | | | | | |
| 2020 | | 23,167 | | | 2,933 | | | 0.9 | | | 4.6 | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 60,656 | | | 55,537 | | | | | 100.0 | % | | | | |
Geographic Dispersion
The following table shows, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the percentage of our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF and the associated percentage of our mortgage insurance reserve for losses (by location of property) for the top 10 states in the U.S. (as measured by our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF as of December 31, 2020).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | |
| Top 10 States | | RIF | | Reserve for Losses | | RIF | | Reserve for Losses | | |
| California | | 9.9 | % | | 11.2 | % | | 11.2 | % | | 8.0 | % | | |
| Texas | | 8.7 | | | 10.0 | | | 9.1 | | | 7.7 | | | |
| Florida | | 7.5 | | | 11.4 | | | 7.1 | | | 11.2 | | | |
| Illinois | | 4.4 | | | 4.9 | | | 4.8 | | | 5.2 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Virginia | | 3.8 | | | 2.6 | | | 3.7 | | | 2.1 | | | |
| New York | | 3.8 | | | 7.0 | | | 3.0 | | | 9.9 | | | |
| New Jersey | | 3.4 | | | 4.9 | | | 3.0 | | | 7.9 | | | |
| Maryland | | 3.4 | | | 3.4 | | | 3.3 | | | 3.3 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Pennsylvania | | 3.3 | | | 2.5 | | | 3.0 | | | 3.3 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Washington | | 3.3 | | | 1.9 | | | 3.0 | | | 1.4 | | | |
| Total | | 51.5 | % | | 59.8 | % | | 51.2 | % | | 60.0 | % | | |
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following table shows, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the percentage of our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF and the associated percentage of our mortgage insurance reserve for losses (by location of property) for the top 10 Core Based Statistical Areas, referred to as “CBSAs,” in the U.S. (as measured by our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF as of December 31, 2020).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Top 10 CBSAs (1) | | RIF | | Reserve for Losses | | RIF | | Reserve for Losses |
| New York, NY-NJ-PA | | 4.7 | % | | 9.1 | % | | 3.8 | % | | 12.3 | % |
| Chicago, IL-IN-WI | | 4.1 | | | 4.7 | | | 4.5 | | | 5.0 | |
| Washington, DC-MD-VA | | 4.0 | | | 3.7 | | | 3.9 | | | 2.5 | |
| Dallas, TX | | 3.2 | | | 3.5 | | | 3.5 | | | 2.6 | |
| Los Angeles - Long Beach, CA | | 2.6 | | | 3.4 | | | 3.0 | | | 2.4 | |
| Atlanta, GA | | 2.5 | | | 3.6 | | | 3.0 | | | 2.8 | |
| Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD | | 2.5 | | | 2.1 | | | 2.3 | | | 2.6 | |
| Houston, TX | | 2.3 | | | 3.3 | | | 2.2 | | | 2.7 | |
| Miami, FL | | 2.2 | | | 4.8 | | | 2.2 | | | 4.3 | |
| Phoenix/Mesa, AZ | | 2.1 | | | 1.9 | | | 2.4 | | | 1.3 | |
| Total | | 30.2 | % | | 40.1 | % | | 30.8 | % | | 38.5 | % |
(1)CBSAs are metropolitan areas and include a portion of adjoining states as noted above.
Risk Distribution
We use third-party reinsurance in our mortgage insurance business as part of our risk distribution strategy, including to manage our capital position and risk profile. When we enter into a reinsurance agreement, the reinsurer receives a premium and, in exchange, insures an agreed upon portion of incurred losses. While these arrangements have the impact of reducing our earned premiums, they reduce our required capital and are expected to increase our return on required capital for the related policies. The impact of these programs on our financial results will vary depending on the level of ceded RIF, as well as the levels of prepayments and incurred losses on the reinsured portfolios, among other factors. See “Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage—Risk Distribution” and Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our reinsurance transactions.
The table below provides information about the amounts by which Radian Guaranty’s reinsurance programs reduced its Minimum Required Assets as of the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
PMIERs impact - reduction in Minimum Required Assets: (1) | | | | | | |
| Excess-of-Loss Program | | $ | 912,734 | | | $ | 738,386 | | | $ | 455,440 | |
| Single Premium QSR Program | | 423,712 | | | 511,695 | | | 522,318 | |
| QSR Program | | 22,712 | | | 35,382 | | | 48,734 | |
| Total PMIERs impact | | $ | 1,359,158 | | | $ | 1,285,463 | | | $ | 1,026,492 | |
| Percentage of gross Minimum Required Assets | | 28.8 | % | | 27.4 | % | | 22.8 | % |
(1)Excludes the impact of intercompany reinsurance agreement with Radian Reinsurance, which was terminated in January 2020. See Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Results of Operations—Consolidated
Radian Group serves as the holding company for our operating subsidiaries and does not have any operations of its own. Our consolidated operating results for 20192020 primarily reflect the financial results and performance of our two business segments—Mortgage Insurance and Services.Real Estate. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the basis ofmodifications to our segment reporting, including the related allocations.allocations and the impacts of the sale of Clayton in January 2020 and subsequent organizational changes made in the first quarter of 2020, as well as the wind down of our traditional appraisal
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
business announced in the fourth quarter of 2020. See “Results of Operations—Mortgage, Insurance,” and “Results of Operations—Services”Real Estate” for the operating results of these business segments.
In addition to the results of our operating segments, pretax income (loss) is also affected by other factors. See “Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Other Factors Affecting Consolidated Results.Results.” See “—Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for more information regarding items that are excluded from the operating results of our operating segments.
The following table highlights selected information related to our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017:2018.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | $ Change |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Favorable (Unfavorable) |
| ($ in millions, except per-share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 vs. 2019 | | 2019 vs. 2018 |
| Pretax income | | $ | 479.4 | | | $ | 849.0 | | | $ | 684.2 | | | $ | (369.6) | | | $ | 164.8 | |
| Net income | | 393.6 | | | 672.3 | | | 606.0 | | | (278.7) | | | 66.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted net income per share | | 2.00 | | | 3.20 | | | 2.77 | | | (1.20) | | | 0.43 | |
| Book value per share at December 31 | | 22.36 | | | 20.13 | | | 16.34 | | | 2.23 | | | 3.79 | |
Net premiums earned (1) | | 1,115.3 | | | 1,145.3 | | | 1,014.0 | | | (30.0) | | | 131.3 | |
Services revenue (2) | | 105.4 | | | 154.6 | | | 145.0 | | | (49.2) | | | 9.6 | |
Net investment income (1) | | 154.0 | | | 171.8 | | | 152.5 | | | (17.8) | | | 19.3 | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 60.3 | | | 51.7 | | | (42.5) | | | 8.6 | | | 94.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for losses (1) | | 485.1 | | | 132.0 | | | 104.6 | | | (353.1) | | | (27.4) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of services (2) | | 86.1 | | | 108.3 | | | 98.1 | | | 22.2 | | | (10.2) | |
Other operating expenses (3) | | 280.7 | | | 306.1 | | | 280.8 | | | 25.4 | | | (25.3) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense (1) | | 71.2 | | | 56.3 | | | 61.5 | | | (14.9) | | | 5.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | — | | | 22.7 | | | — | | | 22.7 | | | (22.7) | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | — | | | 4.8 | | | — | | | 4.8 | | | (4.8) | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | 5.1 | | | 22.3 | | | 12.4 | | | 17.2 | | | (9.9) | |
| Income tax provision | | 85.8 | | | 176.7 | | | 78.2 | | | 90.9 | | | (98.5) | |
Adjusted pretax operating income (4) | | 432.1 | | | 854.6 | | | 745.5 | | | (422.5) | | | 109.1 | |
Adjusted diluted net operating income per share (4) | | 1.74 | | | 3.21 | | | 2.69 | | | (1.47) | | | 0.52 | |
| Return on equity | | 9.4 | % | | 17.8 | % | | 18.7 | % | | (8.4) | % | | (0.9) | % |
Adjusted net operating return on equity (4) | | 8.2 | % | | 17.9 | % | | 18.2 | % | | (9.7) | % | | (0.3) | % |
(1)Relates primarily to the Mortgage segment. See “Results of Operations—Mortgage” for more information.
(2)Relates primarily to our Real Estate segment. See “Results of Operations—Real Estate” and “Results of Operations—All Other” for more information.
(3)See “Results of Operations—Mortgage,” “Results of Operations—Real Estate” and “Results of Operations—All Other” for more information on both direct and allocated operating expenses.
(4)See “—Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ Change |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Favorable (Unfavorable) |
| ($ in millions, except per-share amounts) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| Pretax income | $ | 849.0 |
| | $ | 684.2 |
| | $ | 346.7 |
| | $ | 164.8 |
| | $ | 337.5 |
|
| Net income | 672.3 |
| | 606.0 |
| | 121.1 |
| | 66.3 |
| | 484.9 |
|
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 3.20 |
| | $ | 2.77 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | 0.43 |
| | $ | 2.22 |
|
| Book value per share at December 31 | $ | 20.13 |
| | $ | 16.34 |
| | $ | 13.90 |
| | $ | 3.79 |
| | $ | 2.44 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net premiums earned—insurance (1) | $ | 1,145.3 |
| | $ | 1,014.0 |
| | $ | 932.8 |
| | $ | 131.3 |
| | $ | 81.2 |
|
Services revenue (2) | 154.6 |
| | 145.0 |
| | 155.1 |
| | 9.6 |
| | (10.1 | ) |
Net investment income (1) | 171.8 |
| | 152.5 |
| | 127.2 |
| | 19.3 |
| | 25.3 |
|
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 51.7 |
| | (42.5 | ) | | 3.6 |
| | 94.2 |
| | (46.1 | ) |
Provision for losses (1) | 132.0 |
| | 104.6 |
| | 135.2 |
| | (27.4 | ) | | 30.6 |
|
Cost of services (2) | 108.3 |
| | 98.1 |
| | 104.6 |
| | (10.2 | ) | | 6.5 |
|
| Other operating expenses | 306.1 |
| | 280.8 |
| | 267.3 |
| | (25.3 | ) | | (13.5 | ) |
| Restructuring and other exit costs | — |
| | 6.1 |
| | 17.3 |
| | 6.1 |
| | 11.2 |
|
| Interest expense | 56.3 |
| | 61.5 |
| | 62.8 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 1.3 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 22.7 |
| | — |
| | 51.5 |
| | (22.7 | ) | | 51.5 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill | 4.8 |
| | — |
| | 184.4 |
| | (4.8 | ) | | 184.4 |
|
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | 22.3 |
| | 12.4 |
| | 27.7 |
| | (9.9 | ) | | 15.3 |
|
| Income tax provision | 176.7 |
| | 78.2 |
| | 225.6 |
| | (98.5 | ) | | 147.4 |
|
Adjusted pretax operating income (3) | 854.6 |
| | 745.5 |
| | 617.2 |
| | 109.1 |
| | 128.3 |
|
Adjusted diluted net operating income per share (3) | 3.21 |
| | 2.69 |
| | 1.82 |
| | 0.52 |
| | 0.87 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Return on equity | 17.8 | % | | 18.7 | % | | 4.1 | % | | (0.9 | )% | | 14.6 | % |
Adjusted net operating return on equity (3) | 17.9 | % | | 18.2 | % | | 13.7 | % | | (0.3 | )% | | 4.5 | % |
______________________
| |
(1) | Relates primarily to the Mortgage Insurance segment. See “Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance” for more information. |
| |
(2) | Relates to our Services segment. See “Results of Operations—Services” for more information. |
| |
(3) | See “—Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
|
Net Income. As discussed in more detail below, our net income increased for 2019 compared to 2018 primarily reflecting: (i) an increase in net premiums earned; (ii) an increase in net gains on investments and other financial instruments; and (iii) an increase in net investment income. Partially offsetting these items are increases in: (i) provision for losses; (ii) other operating
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Net Income. As discussed in more detail below, our net income decreased for 2020 compared to 2019, primarily reflecting: (i) an increase in provision for losses; (ii) a decrease in our Mortgage segment net premiums earned; (iii) a decrease in services revenue primarily related to the sale of Clayton; and (iv) a decrease in net investment income. Partially offsetting these items are decreases in: (i) our income tax provision; (ii) other operating expenses; and (iii) loss on extinguishment of debt. In addition, the overall increase in net income was partially offset by an increase in the income tax provision, duedebt; and (iv) cost of services primarily to a $73.6 million tax benefit in 2018 related to the impactsale of Clayton. See “Results of Operations—All Other—Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019” for additional information on the settlementsale of the IRS Matter. See “—Income Tax Provision” below.Clayton.
Diluted Net Income Per Share. The increasedecrease in diluted net income per share for 20192020 compared to 20182019 is primarily due to the change in net income, as discussed above, andpartially offset by the decrease in average diluted shares from 218.6210.3 million shares in 20182019 to 210.3196.6 million shares for 2019.2020.
Adjusted Diluted Net Operating Income Per Share. The increasedecrease in adjusted diluted net operating income per share for 20192020 compared to 20182019 is primarily due to the increasedecrease in our Mortgage Insurance segment’s adjusted pretax operating income, which increaseddecreased to $868.9$451.5 million in 2019,2020, from $772.6$852.9 million in 2018.2019. See “Results of Operations—Mortgage—Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019—Adjusted Pretax Operating Income” for more information on our Mortgage segment’s results.
Book Value Per Share. The increase in book value per share from $16.34 at December 31, 2018, to $20.13 at December 31, 2019, to $22.36 at December 31, 2020, is primarily due to: (i) our net income for the year ended December 31, 20192020 and (ii) an increase of $0.80$0.76 per share due to net unrealized gains in our available for sale securities, recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. These increases were partially offset byPartially offsetting these items is: (i) a decrease$0.49 per share impact of $0.25dividends and dividend equivalents and (ii) a $0.06 per share reduction from the net impact of our share repurchases for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, inclusive of the cost of these repurchases.
Return on Equity. The changes in return on equity across all periods presented are primarily due to the changes in net income and, to a lesser extent, increases in stockholders’ equity. See “—Net Income” above for more information on the changes in net income.
Adjusted Net Operating Return on Equity. The changes in adjusted net operating return on equity across all periods presented are primarily due to the increaseschanges in our adjusted pretax operating income, partially offset by increases in stockholders’ equity. The increases in our adjusted pretax operating income primarily reflect the increases in our Mortgage Insurance segment’s adjusted pretax operating income. See “Results of Operations—Mortgage Insurance—Adjusted Pretax Operating Income” for more information on our Mortgage Insurance segment’s results.
Net Gains (Losses) on Investments and Other Financial Instruments. The netNet gains on investments and other financial instruments for 2019,2020 increased as compared to net losses in 2018, are2019 primarily due to: (i) the increase in unrealized gains in our trading portfolio related to changes in fair value resulting from lower interest rates and (ii) net realized gains on our fixed-maturities available for sale.sale and (ii) higher gains on other financial instruments. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in unrealized gains in our equity and trading portfolio. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on net gains (losses) on investments.
Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses for 2019 increased as compared to 2018, primarily due to: (i) higher compensation expense in 2019, including variable and incentive-based compensation and (ii) ongoing investments in our technology systems. Additionally, operating expenses increased due to: (i) the inclusion of operating expenses of businesses acquired in 2018 and (ii) an increase in non-operating items, primarily related to impairment of other long-lived assets. Partially offsetting these items is an increase in ceding commissions, related to higher earned premiums on policies covered under our Single Premium QSR Program.
Restructuring and Other Exit Costs. In 2019, we did not recognize any restructuring or other exit costs. For 2018, we recognized $3.6 million of other exit costs associated with impairment of internal-use software. Restructuring and other exit costs for 2018 also include the remaining charges associated with our 2017 plan to restructure the Services business.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for 2019 decreased compared to 2018. This decrease was primarily due to reductions in interest expense from our: (i) repayment at maturity of $158.6 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Notes due 2019 and (ii) tender offers and the subsequent redemptions that together resulted in the repayment of the remaining aggregate principal amounts of $234.1 million and $197.7 million of our Senior Notes due 2020 and 2021, respectively. Partially offsetting these decreases was higher interest expense from the issuance of $450 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2027.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. During 2019, the redemption of our remaining Senior Notes due 2020 and 2021 resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $22.7 million. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. During 2018, we had no loss on extinguishment of debt.
Amortization and Impairment of Other Acquired Intangible Assets and Impairment of Goodwill. During the fourth quarter of 2019, in connection with the reclassification of Clayton toas held for sale, we recorded a goodwill impairment of $4.8 million, as well as an impairment charge for other acquired intangible assets of $13.7 million. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The amortization of intangible assets primarily reflects the amortization of intangible assets acquired as part of the Clayton acquisition in 2014.
Income Tax Provision. Our 20192020 effective tax rate was 20.8%17.9%, which approximates the 21% federal statutory tax rate.as compared to 20.8% for 2019. Our 2018 effective tax rate of 11.4%in 2020 was lower than the federal statutory tax rate primarily due to the accounting for uncertainty of income taxes, which we view as a result ofDiscrete Item. Our effective tax rate in 2019 approximated the federal statutory tax benefit recorded related to the settlement of our IRS Matter.rate.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. In addition to the traditional GAAP financial measures, we have presented “adjusted pretax operating income,” “adjusted diluted net operating income per share” and “adjusted net operating return on equity,” which are non-GAAP financial measures for the consolidated company, among our key performance indicators to evaluate our fundamental financial performance. These non-GAAP financial measures align with the way our business performance is evaluated by both management and by our board of directors. These measures have been established in order to increase transparency for the purposes of evaluating our operating trends and enabling more meaningful comparisons with our peers. Although on a consolidated basis “adjusted pretax operating income,” “adjusted diluted net operating income per share” and “adjusted net operating return on equity”equity” are non-GAAP financial measures, for the reasons discussed above we believe these measures aid in understanding the underlying performance of our operations.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Total adjusted pretax operating income (loss), adjusted diluted net operating income (loss) per share and adjusted net operating return on equity are not measures of overall profitability, and therefore should not be considered in isolation or viewed as substitutes for GAAP pretax income (loss), diluted net income (loss) per share or return on equity. Our definitions of adjusted pretax operating income (loss), adjusted diluted net operating income (loss) per share and adjusted net operating return on equity, as discussed and reconciled below to the most comparable respective GAAP measures, may not be comparable to similarly-named measures reported by other companies.
Our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer (Radian’s chief operating decision maker), uses adjusted pretax operating income (loss) as our primary measure to evaluate the fundamental financial performance of the Company’s business segments and to allocate resources to the segments.
Adjusted pretax operating income (loss) is defined as GAAP consolidated pretax income (loss), excluding the effects of: (i) net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments; (ii) loss on extinguishment of debt; (iii) amortization and impairment of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets; and (iv) impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items, such as lossesgains (losses) from the sale of lines of business and acquisition-related expenses. Adjusted diluted net operating income per share is calculated by dividing (i) adjusted pretax operating income attributable to common stockholders, net of taxes computed using the Company’s statutory tax rate, by (ii) the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and all dilutive potential common shares outstanding. Adjusted net operating return on equity is calculated by dividing annualized adjusted pretax operating income, net of taxes computed using the Company’s statutory tax rate, by average stockholders’ equity, based on the average of the beginning and ending balances for each period presented.
Although adjusted pretax operating income (loss) excludes certain items that have occurred in the past and are expected to occur in the future, the excluded items represent those that are: (i) not viewed as part of the operating performance of our primary activities or (ii) not expected to result in an economic impact equal to the amount reflected in pretax income.income (loss). These adjustments, along with the reasons for their treatment, are described below.
| |
(1) | Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments. The recognition of realized investment gains or losses can vary significantly across periods as the activity is highly discretionary based on the timing of individual securities sales due to such factors as market opportunities, our tax and capital profile and overall market cycles. Unrealized gains and losses arise primarily from changes in the market value of our investments that are classified as trading or equity securities. These valuation adjustments may not necessarily result in realized economic gains or losses.
|
Trends in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table provides a reconciliation of consolidated pretax income to our non-GAAP financial measure for the profitabilityconsolidated Company of our fundamentaladjusted pretax operating activities can be more clearly identified withoutincome.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Consolidated pretax income | | $ | 479,441 | | | $ | 848,993 | | | $ | 684,186 | |
| Less income (expense) items: | | | | | | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 60,277 | | | 51,719 | | | (42,476) | |
| | | | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | — | | | (22,738) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | — | | | (4,828) | | | — | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | (5,144) | | | (22,288) | | | (12,429) | |
Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items (1) | | (7,759) | | | (7,507) | | | (6,404) | |
Total adjusted pretax operating income (2) | | $ | 432,067 | | | $ | 854,635 | | | $ | 745,495 | |
(1)The amounts for the fluctuations of these realizedyears ended December 31, 2020 and unrealized gains or losses and changes in fair value2019 primarily relate to impairments of other financial instruments. We do not view themlong-lived assets and are included in other operating expenses on the consolidated statement of operations. The amount for the year ended December 31, 2018 is included within restructuring and other exit costs on the consolidated statements of operations, except for $1.6 million in 2018 related to be indicativethe impairment of other long-lived assets, included in other operating expenses.
(2)Total adjusted pretax operating income on a consolidated basis consists of adjusted pretax operating income (loss) for our fundamental operating activities.
| |
(2) | Loss on extinguishment of debt. Mortgage segment, Real Estate segment and All Other activities, as further detailed in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt and losses incurred to purchase our debt prior to maturity are discretionary activities that are undertaken in order to take advantage of market opportunities to strengthen our financial and capital positions; therefore, we do not view these activities as part of our operating performance. Such transactions do not reflect expected future operations and do not provide meaningful insight regarding our current or past operating trends.
|
| |
(3) | Amortization and impairment of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets. Amortization of acquired intangible assets represents the periodic expense required to amortize the cost of acquired intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Acquired intangible assets are also periodically reviewed for potential impairment, and impairment adjustments are made whenever appropriate. We do not view these charges as part of the operating performance of our primary activities.
|
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| |
(4) | Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items. Includes activities that we do not view to be indicative of our fundamental operating activities, such as:Adjusted diluted net operating income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing (i) gains (losses) from the sale of lines of business and (ii) acquisition-related expenses.
|
Total adjusted pretax operating income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, net of taxes computed using the Company’s statutory tax rate, by (ii) the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and all dilutive potential common shares outstanding. The following table provides a reconciliation of diluted net income (loss) per share to our non-GAAP financial measure for the consolidated company of adjusted diluted net operating income (loss) per share,share.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Diluted net income per share | | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 3.20 | | | $ | 2.77 | |
| Less per-share impact of reconciling income (expense) items: | | | | | | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 0.31 | | | 0.25 | | | (0.19) | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | — | | | (0.11) | | | — | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | — | | | (0.02) | | | — | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | (0.03) | | | (0.11) | | | (0.06) | |
| Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items | | (0.04) | | | (0.04) | | | (0.03) | |
Income tax (provision) benefit on other income (expense) items (1) | | (0.05) | | | 0.01 | | | 0.06 | |
Difference between statutory and effective tax rate (2) | | 0.07 | | | 0.01 | | | 0.30 | |
| Per-share impact of other income (expense) items | | 0.26 | | | (0.01) | | | 0.08 | |
Adjusted diluted net operating income per share (1) | | $ | 1.74 | | | $ | 3.21 | | | $ | 2.69 | |
(1)Calculated using the Company’s federal statutory tax rate of 21%. Any permanent tax adjustments and adjustedstate income taxes on these items have been deemed immaterial and are not included.
(2)For 2018, includes $0.34 of tax benefit related to the settlement of the IRS Matter, which includes both the impact of the settlement with the IRS as well as the reversal of certain related previously accrued state and local tax liabilities.
Adjusted net operating return on equity are not measures of overall profitability, and therefore should not be considered in isolation or viewed as substitutes for GAAP pretax income, diluted net income per share, or return on equity. Our definitions ofis calculated by dividing annualized adjusted pretax operating income adjusted diluted(loss), net operating income per share,of taxes computed using the Company’s statutory tax rate, by average stockholders’ equity, based on the average of the beginning and adjusted net operating return on equity may not be comparable to similarly-named measures reported by other companies.
ending balances for each period presented. The following tables provide reconciliationstable provides a reconciliation of the most comparable GAAP measures of consolidated pretax income, diluted net income per share and return on equity to our non-GAAP financial measuresmeasure for the consolidated Companycompany of adjusted pretax operating income, adjusted diluted net income per share and adjusted net operating return on equity, respectively:equity.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Return on equity (1) | | 9.4 | % | | 17.8 | % | | 18.7 | % |
Less impact of reconciling income (expense) items: (2) | | | | | | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 1.4 | | | 1.4 | | | (1.3) | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | — | | | (0.6) | | | — | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | — | | | (0.1) | | | — | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | (0.1) | | | (0.6) | | | (0.4) | |
| Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items | | (0.2) | | | (0.2) | | | (0.2) | |
Income tax (provision) benefit on reconciling income (expense) items (3) | | (0.2) | | | — | | | 0.4 | |
Difference between statutory and effective tax rate (3) (4) | | 0.3 | | | — | | | 2.0 | |
| Impact of reconciling income (expense) items | | 1.2 | | | (0.1) | | | 0.5 | |
| Adjusted net operating return on equity | | 8.2 | % | | 17.9 | % | | 18.2 | % |
(1)Calculated by dividing net income by average stockholders’ equity.
(2)As a percentage of average stockholders’ equity.
(3)Calculated using the Company’s federal statutory tax rates of 21%. Any permanent tax adjustments and state income taxes on these items have been deemed immaterial and are not included.
(4)The difference in 2018 includes the tax benefit related to the settlement of the IRS Matter, which includes both the impact of the settlement with the IRS as well as the reversal of certain related previously accrued state and local tax liabilities.
Results of Operations—Mortgage
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reconciliation of Consolidated Pretax Income to Adjusted Pretax Operating Income |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Consolidated pretax income | $ | 848,993 |
| | $ | 684,186 |
| | $ | 346,737 |
|
| Less income (expense) items: | | | | | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 51,719 |
| | (42,476 | ) | | 3,621 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | (22,738 | ) | | — |
| | (51,469 | ) |
| Impairment of goodwill | (4,828 | ) | | — |
| | (184,374 | ) |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | (22,288 | ) | | (12,429 | ) | | (27,671 | ) |
Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items (1) | (7,507 | ) | | (6,404 | ) | | (10,545 | ) |
Total adjusted pretax operating income (2) | $ | 854,635 |
|
| $ | 745,495 |
|
| $ | 617,175 |
|
| | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | The amount for the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily relates to impairments of other long-lived assetsAs noted above in Results of Operations—Consolidated and is included in other operating expenses on the consolidated statement of operations. The amounts for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are included within restructuring and other exit costs on the consolidated statements of operations, except for $1.6 million in 2018 related to the impairment of other long-lived assets, included in other operating expenses. |
| |
(2) | Total adjusted pretax operating income on a consolidated basis consists of adjusted pretax operating income (loss) for our |
Mortgage Insurance segment and our Services segment, as further detaileddiscussed in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ Change |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Favorable (Unfavorable) |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 vs. 2019 | | 2019 vs. 2018 |
Adjusted pretax operating income (1) (2) | | $ | 451.5 | | | $ | 852.9 | | | $ | 770.7 | | | $ | (401.4) | | | $ | 82.2 | |
| Net premiums written | | 1,011.0 | | | 1,075.5 | | | 991.0 | | | (64.5) | | | 84.5 | |
| (Increase) decrease in unearned premiums | | 81.8 | | | 58.8 | | | 15.7 | | | 23.0 | | | 43.1 | |
| Net premiums earned | | 1,092.8 | | | 1,134.2 | | | 1,006.7 | | | (41.4) | | | 127.5 | |
| Services revenue | | 14.8 | | | 8.1 | | | 5.0 | | | 6.7 | | | 3.1 | |
| Net investment income | | 137.2 | | | 151.5 | | | 148.3 | | | (14.3) | | | 3.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Provision for losses | | 483.3 | | | 131.5 | | | 104.5 | | | (351.8) | | | (27.0) | |
| Policy acquisition costs | | 31.0 | | | 25.3 | | | 25.3 | | | (5.7) | | | — | |
| Cost of services | | 10.0 | | | 5.0 | | | 3.5 | | | (5.0) | | | (1.5) | |
Other operating expenses (2) | | 200.5 | | | 225.7 | | | 214.5 | | | 25.2 | | | (11.2) | |
| Interest expense | | 71.2 | | | 56.3 | | | 43.7 | | | (14.9) | | | (12.6) | |
(1)Our senior management uses adjusted pretax operating income as our primary measure to evaluate the fundamental financial performance of our business segments. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
(2)Includes allocation of corporate operating expenses of $114.8 million, $104.1 million and $80.1 million for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019
Adjusted Pretax Operating Income. The decrease in our Mortgage segment’s adjusted pretax operating income for 2020, compared to 2019, primarily reflects: (i) an increase in provision for losses and (ii) a decrease in net premiums earned. These items were partially offset by a decrease in other operating expenses. See “—Net Premiums Written and Earned” and “—Provision for Losses” below for more information about our net premiums earned and provision for losses, respectively.
Net Premiums Written and Earned. Net premiums written for 2020 decreased compared to 2019. The decrease reflects lower premium rates on our IIF portfolio compared to the same period in 2019, as well as a lower proportion of Single Premium Policies. In addition, net premiums written for 2020 reflect an increase in ceded premiums resulting from a reduction to accrued profit commissions, due to higher ceded losses primarily recorded in the second quarter of 2020.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Diluted Net Income Per Share to Adjusted Diluted Net Operating Income Per Share |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 3.20 |
| | $ | 2.77 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
|
| Less per-share impact of reconciling income (expense) items: | | | | | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 0.25 |
| | (0.19 | ) | | 0.02 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | (0.11 | ) | | — |
| | (0.23 | ) |
| Impairment of goodwill | (0.02 | ) | | — |
| | (0.84 | ) |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | (0.11 | ) | | (0.06 | ) | | (0.13 | ) |
| Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items | (0.04 | ) | | (0.03 | ) | | (0.05 | ) |
Income tax (provision) benefit on other income (expense) items (1) | 0.01 |
| | 0.06 |
| | 0.43 |
|
Difference between statutory and effective tax rate (2) | 0.01 |
| | 0.30 |
| | (0.47 | ) |
| Per-share impact of other income (expense) items | (0.01 | ) | | 0.08 |
| | (1.27 | ) |
Adjusted diluted net operating income per share (1) | $ | 3.21 |
| | $ | 2.69 |
| | $ | 1.82 |
|
| | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Calculated using the Company’s federal statutory tax rates of 21% for 2019 and 2018 and 35% for 2017. Any permanent tax adjustments and state income taxes on these items have been deemed immaterial and are not included. |
| |
(2) | For 2018, includes $0.34 of tax benefit related to the settlement of the IRS Matter, which includes both the impact of the settlement with the IRS as well as the reversal of certain related previously accrued state and local tax liabilities. All of the 2017 amount represents additional tax expense related to the remeasurement of our net deferred tax assets as a result of the TCJA enacted in December 2017. |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Return on Equity to Adjusted Net Operating Return on Equity (1) |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Return on equity (1) | 17.8 | % | | 18.7 | % | | 4.1 | % |
Less impact of reconciling income (expense) items: (2) | | | | | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 1.4 |
| | (1.3 | ) | | 0.1 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | (0.6 | ) | | — |
| | (1.8 | ) |
| Impairment of goodwill | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | (6.3 | ) |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | (0.6 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | (0.9 | ) |
| Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items | (0.2 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
Income tax (provision) benefit on reconciling income (expense) items (3) | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | 3.2 |
|
Difference between statutory and effective tax rate (3) (4) | — |
| | 2.0 |
| | (3.5 | ) |
| Impact of reconciling income (expense) items | (0.1 | ) | | 0.5 |
| | (9.6 | ) |
| Adjusted net operating return on equity | 17.9 | % | | 18.2 | % | | 13.7 | % |
| | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Calculated by dividing net income by average stockholders’ equity. |
| |
(2) | As a percentage of average stockholders’ equity. |
| |
(3) | Calculated using the Company’s federal statutory tax rates of 21% for 2019 and 2018 and 35% for 2017. Any permanent tax adjustments and state income taxes on these items have been deemed immaterial and are not included. |
| |
(4) | The difference in 2018 includes the tax benefit related to the settlement of the IRS Matter, which includes both the impact of the settlement with the IRS as well as the reversal of certain related previously accrued state and local tax liabilities. All of the 2017 amount represents additional tax expense related to the remeasurement of our net deferred tax assets as a result of the TCJA enacted in December 2017. |
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ResultsThe table below provides additional information about the components of Operations—Mortgage Insurance
During 2019, we continued our strategy of growing our mortgage insurance portfolio, executing our risk distribution strategy and effectively managing our capital and liquidity positions.
The following table summarizes our Mortgage Insurance segment’s results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ Change |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Favorable (Unfavorable) |
| (In millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
Adjusted pretax operating income (1) (2) | $ | 868.9 |
| | $ | 772.6 |
| | $ | 651.0 |
| | $ | 96.3 |
| | $ | 121.6 |
|
| Net premiums written—insurance | 1,075.5 |
| | 991.0 |
| | 818.4 |
| | 84.5 |
| | 172.6 |
|
| (Increase) decrease in unearned premiums | 58.8 |
| | 15.7 |
| | 114.4 |
| | 43.1 |
| | (98.7 | ) |
| Net premiums earned—insurance | 1,134.2 |
| | 1,006.7 |
| | 932.8 |
| | 127.5 |
| | 73.9 |
|
| Net investment income | 171.1 |
| | 152.1 |
| | 127.2 |
| | 19.0 |
| | 24.9 |
|
| Provision for losses | 131.5 |
| | 104.5 |
| | 136.2 |
| | (27.0 | ) | | 31.7 |
|
| Policy acquisition costs | 25.3 |
| | 25.3 |
| | 24.3 |
| | — |
| | (1.0 | ) |
Other operating expenses (2) | 226.8 |
| | 215.5 |
| | 206.4 |
| | (11.3 | ) | | (9.1 | ) |
| Interest expense | 56.3 |
| | 43.7 |
| | 45.0 |
| | (12.6 | ) | | 1.3 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Our senior management uses adjusted pretax operating income as our primary measure to evaluate the fundamental financial performance of our business segments. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. |
| |
(2) | Includes allocation of corporate operating expenses of $104.1 million, $80.1 million and $55.4 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
|
Adjusted Pretax Operating Income. The increase in our Mortgage Insurance segment’s adjusted pretax operating income for 2019, compared to 2018, primarily reflects: (i) an increase in net premiums earned and (ii) an increase in net investment income. See “—NIW, IIF, RIF—Net Premiums Written and Earned” for more information about our net premiums earned. Partially offsetting these items are increases in: (i) provision for losses; (ii) other operating expenses; and (iii) interest expense as a result of the Clayton Intercompany Note repayment. See “Results of Operations—Services—Interest Expense” for additional information.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
NIW, IIF, RIF
A key component of our current business strategy is to write profitable NIW while effectively maintaining the portfolio’s health, balance and profitability. Consistent with this objective, we wrote $71.3 billion of primary new mortgage insurance in 2019, compared to $56.5 billion of NIW in 2018. The NIW written on a Flow Basis in 2019 was Radian’s highest volume in its history. Our 2019 NIW, partially offset by cancellations and amortization within our existing portfolio, resulted in an increase in IIF to $240.6 billion at December 31, 2019, from $221.4 billion at December 31, 2018, as shown in the chart below.
______________________
| |
(1) | Policy years represent the original policy years, and have not been adjusted to reflect subsequent refinancing activity under HARP. |
| |
(2) | Adjusted to reflect subsequent refinancing activity under HARP, this percentage would decrease to 4.7%, 6.0%, and 8.4% as of December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. |
Our IIF is the primary driver of the future premiums that we expect to earn over time. Although not reflected in the current period financial statements, nor in our reported book value, we expect our IIF to generate substantial earnings in future periods, due to the high credit quality of our current mortgage insurance portfolio and its expected persistency over multiple years. See “Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage Insurance—IIF; Persistency Rate; Mix of Business” for more information.
We target a blended return on required capital on new business on an unlevered basis (i.e., after-tax underwriting returns
plus projected investment income) within the mid-teens range. This projected targeted return incorporates the impact of the PMIERs 2.0 financial requirements and the risk distribution programs we have in place to cover NIW at the time it is originated, such as our Single Premium QSR Program, but does not include the impact of leverage or risk distribution transactions that are executed after the NIW has been originated, such as our Excess-of-Loss Program. Actions we take with respect to pricing and risk on NIW we are writing today are expected to gradually affect our results over time, due to the natural turnover of the mortgage insurance portfolio as existing IIF cancels.
Our NIW increased by 26.1% in 2019 as compared to 2018, aided by a strong mortgage origination market and increased private mortgage insurance penetration rates. See “Overview—Operating Environment” for additional information about the mortgage origination market. Our NIW for 2019 also reflects the successful implementation of our spectrum of innovative pricing structures, including RADAR Rates, our “black box” pricing strategy. Currently, a majority of the NIW we are writing is being priced through RADAR Rates.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Historical loan performance data indicates that credit scores and underwriting quality are key drivers of credit performance. As of December 31, 2019, our portfolio of business written subsequent to 2008, including refinancings under HARP, represented approximately 95% of our total primary RIF. Loan originations after 2008 have consisted primarily of high credit quality loans with significantly better credit performance than loans originated during 2008 and prior periods. The volume of insurance that we have written on high credit quality loans after 2008 has significantly improved our mortgage insurance portfolio mix. Our actual and expected future losses on our portfolio written after 2008, together with refinancings under HARP, are significantly lower than those experienced on our NIW prior to and including 2008. The following charts illustrate the trends of our cumulative incurred loss ratios by year of origination and development year.
______________________
| |
(1) | Represents inception-to-date losses incurred as a percentage of net premiums earned. |
| |
(2) | Radian’s stochastic modeling, used for pricing, indicates an approximate 20% through-the-cycle loss ratio on newly originated mortgage insurance business. |
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following tables provide selected information as of and for the periods indicatedindicated, including the effects of our reinsurance programs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| ($ in thousands, except average primary IIF) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net premiums earned: | | | | | | |
| Direct | | | | | | |
| Premiums earned, excluding revenue from cancellations | | $ | 1,070,335 | | | $ | 1,154,045 | | (1) | $ | 1,018,874 | |
| Single Premium Policy cancellations | | 193,349 | | | 79,483 | | | 47,990 | |
| Direct | | 1,263,684 | | | 1,233,528 | | (1) | 1,066,864 | |
Assumed (2) | | 12,214 | | | 10,382 | | | 6,904 | |
| Ceded | | | | | | |
| Premiums earned, excluding revenue from cancellations | | (107,451) | | | (134,946) | | (1) | (85,357) | |
Single Premium Policy cancellations (3) | | (55,483) | | | (23,766) | | | (13,726) | |
Profit commission—other (4) | | (20,197) | | | 49,016 | | (1) | 32,036 | |
| Ceded premiums, net of profit commission | | (183,131) | | | (109,696) | | (1) | (67,047) | |
| Total net premiums earned | | $ | 1,092,767 | | | $ | 1,134,214 | | (1) | $ | 1,006,721 | |
| | | | | | | |
Direct premium yield (in basis points) (5) | | 44.5 | | 50.4 | (1) | 48.6 |
Net premium yield (in basis points) (6) | | 44.9 | | 49.1 | (1) | 47.7 |
| Average primary IIF (in billions) | | $ | 243.4 | | | $ | 231.0 | | | $ | 211.1 | |
(1)Includes a cumulative adjustment to unearned premiums recorded in the second quarter of 2019 related to mortgage insurance NIW, RIF and IIF. Policy years representan update to the original policy years and have not been adjustedamortization rates used to reflect subsequent refinancing activity under HARP. Throughout this report, unless otherwise noted, RIF is presented on a gross basis and includes the amount ceded under reinsurance. NIW, RIF and IIF for direct Single Premiums include policies written on an individual basis (as each loan is originated) and on an aggregated basis (in which each individual loan in a group of loans is insured in a single transaction, typically after the loans have been originated).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Primary NIW | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| ($ in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Total primary NIW | $ | 71,327 |
| | $ | 56,547 |
| | $ | 53,905 |
|
| Total primary risk written | $ | 17,163 |
| | $ | 14,264 |
| | $ | 13,569 |
|
| Average coverage percentage | 24.1 | % | | 25.2 | % | | 25.2 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Primary NIW by Loan Purpose: | | | | | |
| Purchases | 81.1 | % | | 93.8 | % | | 88.8 | % |
| Refinances | 18.9 | % | | 6.2 | % | | 11.2 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Primary NIW by Premium Type: | | | | | |
| Direct Monthly and Other Recurring Premiums | 83.5 | % | | 78.8 | % | | 76.5 | % |
| Direct single premiums: | | | | | |
| Borrower-paid | 14.2 |
| | 11.9 |
| | 2.5 |
|
Lender-paid (1) | 2.3 |
| | 9.3 |
| | 21.0 |
|
| Total | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Total borrower-paid | 96.7 | % | | 89.6 | % | | 77.9 | % |
| | | | | | |
Primary NIW by FICO Score (2) : | | | | | |
| >=740 | 63.3 | % | | 55.6 | % | | 56.3 | % |
| 680-739 | 31.9 | % | | 35.6 | % | | 36.2 | % |
| 620-679 | 4.8 | % | | 8.8 | % | | 7.5 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Primary NIW by LTV: | | | | | |
| 95.01% and above | 16.7 | % | | 16.7 | % | | 13.2 | % |
| 90.01% to 95.00% | 37.7 | % | | 44.4 | % | | 46.0 | % |
| 85.01% to 90.00% | 28.0 | % | | 27.6 | % | | 28.5 | % |
| 85.00% and below | 17.6 | % | | 11.3 | % | | 12.3 | % |
______________________
| |
(1) | Lender-paid Single Premium Policies have higher Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs as compared to borrower-paid Single Premium Policies. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—GSE Requirements—PMIERs—Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements”for additional information.
|
| |
(2) | For loans with multiple borrowers, the percentage of primary NIW by FICO score represents the lowest of the borrowers’ FICO scores. Data for 2018 and 2017 had previously been presented based on the FICO score of the primary borrower and have been restated to reflect the lowest of the borrowers’ FICO scores. |
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Primary IIF and RIF | Year Ended December 31, |
| ($ in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Total primary IIF | $ | 240,558 |
| | $ | 221,443 |
| | $ | 200,724 |
|
| Total primary RIF | $ | 60,921 |
| | $ | 56,728 |
| | $ | 51,288 |
|
| Average coverage percentage | 25.3 | % | | 25.6 | % | | 25.6 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Total primary RIF on defaulted loans | $ | 1,061 |
| | $ | 1,032 |
| | $ | 1,389 |
|
| Percentage of RIF in default | 1.7 | % | | 1.8 | % | | 2.7 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Persistency Rate (12 months ended) | 78.2 | % | | 83.1 | % | | 81.1 | % |
Persistency Rate (quarterly, annualized) (1) | 75.0 | % | | 85.5 | % | | 79.4 | % |
| | | | | | |
Net premium yield (in basis points) (2) | 49.1 |
| | 47.7 |
| | 48.6 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Primary RIF by Premium Type: | | | | | |
| Direct Monthly and Other Recurring Premiums | 72.4 | % | | 70.3 | % | | 69.1 | % |
| Direct single premiums: | | | | | |
| Borrower-paid | 9.1 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 5.9 |
|
Lender-paid (3) | 18.5 |
| | 22.4 |
| | 25.0 |
|
| Total | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Total borrower-paid | 78.9 | % | | 74.5 | % | | 71.3 | % |
| | | | | �� | |
Primary RIF by FICO Score (4) : | | | | | |
| >=740 | 56.9 | % | | 55.1 | % | | 54.8 | % |
| 680-739 | 34.2 | % | | 34.8 | % | | 34.4 | % |
| 620-679 | 8.2 | % | | 9.3 | % | | 9.7 | % |
| <=619 | 0.7 | % | | 0.8 | % | | 1.1 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Primary RIF by LTV: | | | | | |
| 95.01% and above | 14.2 | % | | 11.6 | % | | 9.2 | % |
| 90.01% to 95.00% | 51.3 | % | | 53.1 | % | | 53.2 | % |
| 85.01% to 90.00% | 27.9 | % | | 29.0 | % | | 30.6 | % |
| 85.00% and below | 6.6 | % | | 6.3 | % | | 7.0 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Primary RIF by Policy Year: | | | | | |
| 2008 and prior | 7.8 | % | | 10.1 | % | | 14.0 | % |
| 2009 - 2013 | 7.5 | % | | 11.4 | % | | 16.8 | % |
| 2014 | 4.3 | % | | 6.1 | % | | 8.5 | % |
| 2015 | 7.4 | % | | 10.2 | % | | 13.8 | % |
| 2016 | 12.5 | % | | 16.8 | % | | 21.4 | % |
| 2017 | 16.0 | % | | 21.1 | % | | 25.5 | % |
| 2018 | 17.9 | % | | 24.3 | % | | — | % |
| 2019 | 26.6 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
______________________
| |
(1) | The Persistency Rate on a quarterly, annualized basis is calculated based on loan-level detail for the quarter ending as of the date shown. It may be impacted by seasonality or other factors, including the level of refinance activity during the applicable periods, and may not be indicative of full-year trends.
|
| |
(2) | Calculated by dividing net premiums earned by average primary IIF. For 2019, includes a 1.4 basis point increase resulting from the impact of the cumulative adjustments in 2019 related to an update to the amortization rates used to |
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
recognize revenue for Single Premium Policies. This adjustment increased the 2019 direct premium yield and net premium yield by 1.9 and 1.4 basis points, respectively. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additionalfurther information.
| |
(3) | Lender-paid Single Premium Policies have higher Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs as compared to borrower-paid Single Premium Policies.
|
| |
(4) | For loans with multiple borrowers, the percentage of primary RIF by FICO score represents the lowest of the borrowers’ FICO scores. Data for 2018 and 2017 had previously been presented based on the FICO score of the primary borrower and have been restated to reflect the lowest of the borrowers’ FICO scores. |
Net Premiums Written(2)Includes premiums from our participation in certain credit risk transfer programs.
(3)Includes the impact of related profit commissions.
(4)Represents the profit commission on the Single Premium QSR Program, excluding the impact of Single Premium Policy cancellations.
(5)Calculated by dividing direct premiums earned, including assumed revenue and Earned. excluding revenue from cancellations, by average primary IIF.
(6)NetCalculated by dividing net premiums written and earned by average primary IIF. The calculation for 2019 increased compared to 2018, reflecting an increase in our IIF primarilyall periods presented incorporates the impact of profit commission adjustments related to an increaseour Single Premium QSR Program. For the year ended December 31, 2020, these profit commission adjustments are significantly impacted by the increased ceded losses in our Monthly Premium Policies. 2020. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Net premiums earned decreased for 2020 compared to 2019, also includesprimarily due to reduced profit commissions as a result of higher ceded losses. Also contributing to the decline for 2020 compared to 2019 was a $32.9 million cumulative adjustment in 2019 related to an update to the amortization rates used to recognize revenue for Single Premium Policies. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
The table below provides additional information about the components of mortgage insurance These decreases to net premiums earned for 2020 were partially offset by the periods indicated, including the effects of our reinsurance programs.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | | | | |
| Net premiums earned—insurance: | | | | | |
| Direct | | | | | |
| Premiums earned, excluding revenue from cancellations | $ | 1,154,045 |
|
| $ | 1,018,874 |
| | $ | 929,668 |
|
| Single Premium Policy cancellations | 79,483 |
| | 47,990 |
| | 60,348 |
|
| Direct | 1,233,528 |
| | 1,066,864 |
| | 990,016 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Assumed | 10,382 |
| (1) | 6,904 |
| (1) | 28 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Ceded | | | | | |
| Premiums earned, excluding revenue from cancellations | (134,946 | ) | | (85,357 | ) | | (63,406 | ) |
Single Premium Policy cancellations (2) | (23,766 | ) | | (13,726 | ) | | (11,734 | ) |
Profit commission—other (3) | 49,016 |
| | 32,036 |
| | 17,869 |
|
| Ceded premiums, net of profit commission | (109,696 | ) | | (67,047 | ) | | (57,271 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Total net premiums earned—insurance | $ | 1,134,214 |
| | $ | 1,006,721 |
| | $ | 932,773 |
|
| | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Includes premiums earned from our participation in certain credit risk transfer programs. |
| |
(2) | Includes the impact of related profit commissions. |
| |
(3) | The amounts represent the profit commission on the Single Premium QSR Program, excluding the impact of Single Premium Policy cancellations. |
The impact of the level of mortgage prepayments based on the mix of business we writeprepayment speeds affects the revenue ultimately produced by our mortgage insurance business.business and is influenced by the mix of business we write. We believe that writing a mix of Single Premium Policies and Monthly Premium Policies has the potential to moderate the overall impact on our results if actual prepayments are significantly different from expectations. However, the impact of this moderating effect is affected by the amount of reinsurance we obtain on portions of our portfolio, with the Single Premium QSR Program currently reducing the proportion of retained Single Premium Policies in our portfolio. See “Overview—Operating Environment” as well as “Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage InsuranceResults—IIF; Persistency Rate; Mix of Business” aboveMortgage—IIF and Related Drivers” for more information.
We experienced a decrease in our total mix of Single Premium Policies to 16.5% of our NIW for 2019, compared to 21.2% for 2018. Borrower-paid Single Premium Policies were 86.1% of our total direct Single Premium NIW for 2019 compared to 56.1% for 2018. We expect our production level for Single Premium Policies to fluctuate over time based on various factors, which include risk/return considerations and market conditions.
Net Premiums Written and Earned—Ceded. We use third-party reinsurance in our mortgage insurance business as part of our risk distribution strategy, including to manage our capital position and risk profile. When we enter into a reinsurance agreement, the reinsurer receives a premium and, in exchange, agrees to insure an agreed upon portion of incurred losses. While these arrangements have the impact of reducing our earned premiums, they reduce our required capital and are expected to
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
increase our return on required capital for the related policies. The impact of these programs on our financial results will vary depending on the level of ceded RIF, as well as the levels of prepayments and incurred losses on the reinsured portfolios, among other factors. See “Key Factors Affecting Our Results—Mortgage Insurance—Risk Distribution” and Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our reinsurance transactions.
The following table provides information related to the premium impact on premiums earned of our reinsurance transactions. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our reinsurance programs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Ceded premiums earned: | | | | | | |
| Single Premium QSR Program | | $ | 137,198 | | | $ | 69,632 | | | $ | 44,286 | |
| Excess-of-Loss Program | | 37,053 | | | 25,483 | | | 2,305 | |
| QSR Program | | 8,418 | | | 13,979 | | | 19,660 | |
| Other | | 462 | | | 602 | | | 796 | |
Total ceded premiums earned (1) | | $ | 183,131 | | | $ | 109,696 | | | $ | 67,047 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Percentage of total direct and assumed premiums earned | | 14.2 | % | | 8.8 | % | | 6.1 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Ceded premiums earned: | | | | | |
| QSR Program | $ | 13,979 |
| | $ | 19,660 |
| | $ | 28,503 |
|
| Single Premium QSR Program | 69,632 |
| | 44,286 |
| | 27,284 |
|
| Excess-of-Loss Program | 25,483 |
| | 2,305 |
| | — |
|
Total ceded premiums earned (1) | $ | 109,094 |
| | $ | 66,251 |
| | $ | 55,787 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Percentage of total direct and assumed premiums earned | 8.8 | % | | 6.1 | % | | 5.7 | % |
| | | | | | |
______________________(1) | |
(1) | Does not include ceded premiums earned related to our captive reinsurance arrangements or the benefit from ceding commissions on our Single Premium QSR Programs, which are included in other operating expenses on the consolidated statement of operations. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
The table below provides information about the PMIERs impact of our reinsurance programs on our Minimum Required Assets asSingle Premium QSR Programs, which are included in other operating expenses on the consolidated statement of the dates indicated.operations. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
PMIERs impact - reduction in Minimum Required Assets: (1) | | | | | |
| QSR Program | $ | 35,382 |
| | $ | 48,734 |
| | $ | 65,757 |
|
| Single Premium QSR Program | 511,695 |
| | 522,318 |
| | 446,509 |
|
| Excess-of-Loss Program | 738,386 |
| | 455,440 |
| | — |
|
| Total PMIERs impact | $ | 1,285,463 |
| | $ | 1,026,492 |
| | $ | 512,266 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Percentage of gross Minimum Required Assets | 27.4 | % | | 22.8 | % | | 11.8 | % |
| | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Excludes the impact of intercompany reinsurance and captive reinsurance arrangements. |
Net Investment Income. HigherLower investment yields, partially offset by higher average investment balances, combined with higher investment yields, resulted in increasesdecreases in net investment income for 2019,2020, compared to 2018.2019. Our higher investment balances were primarily a result of investing our positive cash flowflows from operations. All periods include full allocation to the Mortgage Insurance segment of net investment income from investments held at Radian Group.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Provision for Losses. The following table details the financial impact of the significant components of our provision for losses for the periods indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| ($ in millions, except reserve per new default) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Current year defaults (1) | | $ | 517.8 | | | $ | 146.7 | | | $ | 135.3 | |
Prior year defaults (2) | | (34.5) | | | (14.7) | | | (31.7) | |
| Second-lien mortgage loan PDR and other | | — | | | (0.5) | | | 0.9 | |
| Provision for losses | | $ | 483.3 | | | $ | 131.5 | | | $ | 104.5 | |
Loss ratio (3) | | 44.2 | % | | 11.6 | % | | 10.4 | % |
Reserve per new default (4) | | $ | 4,793 | | | $ | 3,579 | | | $ | 3,621 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Current year defaults (1) | $ | 146.7 |
| | $ | 135.3 |
| | $ | 185.5 |
|
Prior year defaults (2) | (14.7 | ) | | (31.7 | ) | | (49.3 | ) |
| Second-lien mortgage loan PDR and other | (0.5 | ) | | 0.9 |
| | — |
|
| Provision for losses | $ | 131.5 |
| | $ | 104.5 |
| | $ | 136.2 |
|
| | | | | | |
Loss ratio (3) | 11.6 | % | | 10.4 | % | | 14.6 | % |
| | | | | | |
______________________(2)Related to defaulted loans with a default notice dated in a year earlier than the year indicated, which have been continuously in default since that time.
| |
(1) | Related to defaulted loans with a most recent default notice dated in the year indicated. For example, if a loan had defaulted in a prior year, but then subsequently cured and later re-defaulted in the current year, that default would be considered a current year default. |
| |
(2) | Related to defaulted loans with a default notice dated in a year earlier than the year indicated, which have been continuously in default since that time. |
| |
(3) | Provision for losses as a percentage of net premiums earned. |
(3)Provision for losses as a percentage of net premiums earned. See below and “—Net Premiums Written and Earned” for further discussion of the components of this ratio.
(4)Calculated by dividing provision for losses for new defaults, net of reinsurance, by new primary defaults for each period.
Our mortgage insurance provision for losses for 20192020 increased by $27.0$351.8 million as compared to 2018.2019. Reserves established for new default notices were the primary driver of our total incurred losses for 20192020 and 2018.2019. Current periodyear new primary defaults increased by 0.8% in 2019,significantly for 2020, compared to 2018.2019, as shown below. The increase primarily relates to a significant increase in the number of new default notices resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, substantially all due to borrowers in forbearance programs. Our gross Default to Claim Rate assumption for new primary defaults was 7.5%8.5% at December 31, 2019,2020, compared to 8.0%7.5% as of December 31, 2018.2019. This reduction inincrease reflects the estimated gross Defaultimpact of a worsening macroeconomic environment, partially offset by the expected beneficial effects of mortgage relief options and protections, including forbearance programs under the CARES Act. See Notes 1 and 11 of Notes to Claim Rate assumption,Consolidated Financial Statements and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for additional information. In addition, the new defaults reported in 2020 are concentrated in more recent origination vintages and have higher average loan balances, which was based on observed trends, partially mitigated the increase in ourturn contributes to higher reserves per new default.
Our provision for losses related to the increased number of newduring 2020 benefited from favorable reserve development on prior period defaults, in 2019, compared to 2018.
based on favorable cure activity. Our provision for losses during 2019 was positivelysimilarly impacted by favorable reserve development on prior year defaults. This favorable development in 2019 was primarily driven by a reduction during the period in certain Default to Claim Rate assumptions for prior year defaults, based on observed trends of higher Cures than were previously estimated on those prior year defaults, partially offset by an increase in our IBNR reserve estimate related to certain legal proceedings. See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Our primary default rate at December 31, 2019 was 2.0% compared to 2.1% at December 31, 2018. The following table shows a rollforward of the number of our primary loans in default, including new defaults from our insurance written in years: (i) prior to and including 2008 and (ii) after 2008:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Beginning default inventory | 21,093 |
| | 27,922 |
| | 29,105 |
|
| Plus: New defaults on insurance written in years: | | | | | |
| Prior to and including 2008 | 17,521 |
| | 19,629 |
| | 25,300 |
|
| After 2008 | 23,464 |
| | 17,740 |
| | 17,588 |
|
| Total new defaults | 40,985 |
| | 37,369 |
| | 42,888 |
|
| Less: Cures | 38,005 |
| | 39,799 |
| | 37,464 |
|
Less: Claims paid (1) | 2,747 |
| | 4,322 |
| | 6,477 |
|
Less: Rescissions and Claim Denials, net of (Reinstatements) (2) | 60 |
| | 77 |
| | 130 |
|
| Ending default inventory | 21,266 |
| | 21,093 |
| | 27,922 |
|
| | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Includes those charged to a deductible or captive reinsurance arrangements, as well as commutations. |
| |
(2) | Net of any previous Rescission and Claim Denials that were reinstated during the period. Such reinstated Rescissions and Claim Denials may ultimately result in a paid claim. |
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Beginning default inventory | | 21,266 | | | 21,093 | | | 27,922 | |
| New defaults | | 108,025 | | | 40,985 | | | 37,369 | |
| Cures | | (72,404) | | | (38,005) | | | (39,799) | |
Claims paid (1) | | (1,330) | | | (2,747) | | | (4,322) | |
Rescissions and Claim Denials, net of (Reinstatements) (2) | | (20) | | | (60) | | | (77) | |
| | | | | | |
| Ending default inventory | | 55,537 | | | 21,266 | | | 21,093 | |
(1)Includes those charged to a deductible under Pool Mortgage Insurance arrangements, as well as commutations. Excludes the impact of claims settled in 2020 related to certain previously disclosed legal proceedings. See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
(2)Net of any previous Rescission and Claim Denials that were reinstated during the period. Such reinstated Rescissions and Claim Denials may ultimately result in a paid claim.
We develop our Default to Claim Rate estimates on defaulted loans based on models that use a variety of loan characteristics to determine the likelihood that a default will reach claim status. Our gross Default to Claim Rate estimates on defaulted loans are mainly developed based on the Stage of Default and Time in Default of the underlying defaulted loans, as measured by the progress toward foreclosure sale and the number of months in default. See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the table detailing our Default to Claim Rate assumptions.
The following tables show additional information about our primary loans in default as of the dates indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ in thousands) | | Total | | Foreclosure Stage Defaulted Loans | | Cure % During the 4th Quarter | | Reserve for Losses | | % of Reserve |
| Missed Payments | | # | | % | | # | | % | | $ | | % |
| Two to three payments | | 12,504 | | | 22.5 | % | | 64 | | | 36.5 | % | | $ | 99,491 | | | 12.4 | % |
| Four to 11 payments | | 37,691 | | | 67.9 | | | 190 | | | 26.3 | | | 512,248 | | | 64.1 | |
| 12 payments or more | | 5,067 | | | 9.1 | | | 861 | | | 5.4 | | | 172,161 | | | 21.5 | |
| Pending claims | | 275 | | | 0.5 | | | N/A | | 8.2 | | | 15,614 | | | 2.0 | |
| Total | | 55,537 | | | 100.0 | % | | 1,115 | | | | | 799,514 | | | 100.0 | % |
| IBNR and other | | | | | | | | | | 9,966 | | | |
| LAE | | | | | | | | | | 20,172 | | | |
| Total primary reserves | | | | | | | | | | $ | 829,652 | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| | Total | | Foreclosure Stage Defaulted Loans | | Cure % During the 4th Quarter | | Reserve for Losses | | % of Reserve |
| ($ in thousands) | # | | % | | # | | % | | $ | | % |
| Missed payments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Two to three payments | 10,816 |
| | 50.9 | % | | 125 |
| | 32.6 | % | | $ | 89,187 |
| | 26.2 | % |
| Four to 11 payments | 6,222 |
| | 29.3 |
| | 462 |
| | 21.5 |
| | 94,912 |
| | 27.9 |
|
| 12 payments or more | 3,646 |
| | 17.1 |
| | 1,077 |
| | 7.0 |
| | 124,534 |
| | 36.7 |
|
| Pending claims | 582 |
| | 2.7 |
| | N/A |
| | 3.7 |
| | 31,187 |
| | 9.2 |
|
| Total | 21,266 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 1,664 |
| |
|
| | 339,820 |
| | 100.0 | % |
| IBNR and other | | | | | | | | | 40,920 |
| | |
| LAE | | | | | | | | | 8,918 |
| | |
| Total primary reserves | | | | | | | | | $ | 389,658 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| December 31, 2019 |
| Key Reserve Assumptions |
| Gross Default to Claim Rate % | | Net Default to Claim Rate % | | Claim Severity % |
| 31% | | 30% | | 98% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| | Total | | Foreclosure Stage Defaulted Loans | | Cure % During the 4th Quarter | | Reserve for Losses | | % of Reserve |
| ($ in thousands) | # | | % | | # | | % | | $ | | % |
| Missed payments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Two to three payments | 10,038 |
| | 47.6 | % | | 148 |
| | 33.2 | % | | $ | 83,540 |
| | 23.1 | % |
| Four to 11 payments | 5,905 |
| | 28.0 |
| | 422 |
| | 24.7 |
| | 87,210 |
| | 24.1 |
|
| 12 payments or more | 4,468 |
| | 21.2 |
| | 1,365 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 156,808 |
| | 43.4 |
|
| Pending claims | 682 |
| | 3.2 |
| | N/A |
| | 4.3 |
| | 34,130 |
| | 9.4 |
|
| Total | 21,093 |
| | 100.0 | % | | 1,935 |
| | | | 361,688 |
| | 100.0 | % |
| IBNR and other | | | | | | | | | 13,864 |
| | |
| LAE | | | | | | | | | 10,271 |
| | |
| Total primary reserves | | | | | | | | | $ | 385,823 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| December 31, 2018 |
| Key Reserve Assumptions |
| Gross Default to Claim Rate % | | Net Default to Claim Rate % | | Claim Severity % |
| 35% | | 33% | | 96% |
______________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| ($ in thousands) | | Total | | Foreclosure Stage Defaulted Loans | | Cure % During the 4th Quarter | | Reserve for Losses | | % of Reserve |
| Missed Payments | | # | | % | | # | | % | | $ | | % |
| Two to three payments | | 10,816 | | | 50.9 | % | | 125 | | | 32.6 | % | | $ | 89,187 | | | 26.2 | % |
| Four to 11 payments | | 6,222 | | | 29.3 | | | 462 | | | 21.5 | | | 94,912 | | | 27.9 | |
| 12 payments or more | | 3,646 | | | 17.1 | | | 1,077 | | | 7.0 | | | 124,534 | | | 36.7 | |
| Pending claims | | 582 | | | 2.7 | | | N/A | | 3.7 | | | 31,187 | | | 9.2 | |
| Total | | 21,266 | | | 100.0 | % | | 1,664 | | | | | 339,820 | | | 100.0 | % |
| IBNR and other | | | | | | | | | | 40,920 | | | |
| LAE | | | | | | | | | | 8,918 | | | |
| Total primary reserves | | | | | | | | | | $ | 389,658 | | | |
N/A – Not applicable
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our aggregate weighted-average net Default to Claim Rate assumption for our primary loans used in estimating our reserve for losses, which is net of estimated Claim Denials and Rescissions, was approximately 30%24% and 33%30%, at December 31,
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
2020 and 2019, and 2018, respectively. This decrease was primarily due to a shift in the mix of defaults during 2020, given the larger proportion of more recent defaults, including defaults of loans subject to forbearance programs implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our net Default to Claim Rate and loss reserve estimate incorporates our expectations with respect to future Rescissions, Claim Denials and Claim Curtailments. Our estimate of such net future Loss Mitigation Activities, inclusive of claim withdrawals, reduced our loss reserve as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 by $19$29 million and $32$19 million, respectively. These expectations are based primarily on recent claim withdrawal activity and our recent experience with respect to the number of claims that have been denied due to the policyholder’s failure to submit sufficient documentation to perfect a claim within the time period permitted under our Master Policies, and alsoas well as our recent experience with respect to the number of insurance certificates that have been rescinded due to fraud, underwriter negligence or other factors.
Our reported Rescission, Claim Denial and Claim Curtailments activity in any given period is subject to challenge by our lender and servicer customers through our claims rebuttal process. In addition, we are at times engaged in discussions with our lender and servicer customers regarding our Loss Mitigation Activities. Unless a liability associated with such activities or discussions becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated, we consider our claim payments and our Rescissions, Claim Denials and Claim Curtailments to be resolved for financial reporting purposes. In accordance with the accounting standard regarding contingencies, we accrue for an estimated loss when we determine that the loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated.
We expect that a portion of previously rescinded policies will be reinstated and previously denied claims will be resubmitted with the required documentation and ultimately paid; therefore, we have incorporated this expectation into our IBNR reserve estimate. Our IBNR reserve estimate was $41.0$10.0 million and $11.3$41.0 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The decrease in our IBNR reserve in 2020 as compared to 2019 is primarily related to claims paid in 2020 to settle certain previously disclosed legal proceedings. See Notes 11 and 2018, respectively. See Note 1113 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Factors that impact the severity of a claim include, but are not limited to: (i) the size of the loan; (ii) the amount of mortgage insurance coverage placed on the loan; (iii) the amount of time between default and claim during which we are expected to cover interest (capped at two years under our Prior Master Policy and capped at three years under our 2014 Master Policy and 2020 Master Policy) and certain expenses; and (iv) the impact of certain loss management activities with respect to the loan. The average Claim Severity experienced for loans covered by our primary insurance was 101.8%101.4% for 2019,2020, compared to 104.9%101.8% in 2018.2019.
Our mortgage insurance total loss reserve as a percentage of our mortgage insurance total RIF was 1.4% and 0.7% at bothDecember 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018.respectively. See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our reserves for losses and a reconciliation of our Mortgage Insurance segment’s beginning and ending reserves for losses and LAE.
Total mortgage insurance claims paid in 20192020 of $132.2$97.6 million have decreased from claims paid of $215.9$132.2 million in 2018.2019. The decrease in claims paid is consistent with the ongoing decline in the outstanding default inventory.primarily attributable to COVID-19-related forbearance plans and suspensions of foreclosures and evictions. Claims paid in both periods also include the impact of commutations.commutations and settlements, including for payments made in 2020 to settle certain previously disclosed legal proceedings. Although expected claims are included in our reserve for losses, the timing of claims paid is subject to fluctuation from quarter to quarter, based on the rate that defaults cure and other factors, including the impact of foreclosure moratoriums (as further described in “Item 1. Business—Mortgage Insurance—Business—Mortgage—Defaults and Claims”), that make the timing of paid claims difficult to predict.
The following table shows net claims paid by product and the average claim paid by product for the periods indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Net claims paid: (1) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Total primary claims paid | | $ | 66,186 | | | $ | 118,548 | | | $ | 187,639 | |
| Total pool and other | | (432) | | | 3,162 | | | 3,842 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Subtotal | | 65,754 | | | 121,710 | | | 191,481 | |
Impact of commutations and settlements (2) | | 31,847 | | | 10,517 | | | 24,467 | |
| Total net claims paid | | $ | 97,601 | | | $ | 132,227 | | | $ | 215,948 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Total average net primary claim paid (1) (3) | | $ | 46.7 | | | $ | 49.0 | | | $ | 53.7 | |
Average direct primary claim paid (3) (4) | | $ | 49.4 | | | $ | 50.0 | | | $ | 54.4 | |
(1)Net of reinsurance recoveries.
(2)Includes payments to commute mortgage insurance coverage on certain performing and non-performing loans. For the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily includes payments made to settle certain previously disclosed legal proceedings.
(3)Calculated without giving effect to the impact of commutations and settlements.
(4)Before reinsurance recoveries.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Net claims paid: (1) | | | | | |
| Total primary claims paid | $ | 118,548 |
| | $ | 187,639 |
| | $ | 278,440 |
|
| Total pool and other | 3,162 |
| | 3,842 |
| | 8,750 |
|
| Subtotal | 121,710 |
| | 191,481 |
| | 287,190 |
|
Impact of commutations and settlements (2) | 10,517 |
| | 24,467 |
| | 103,190 |
|
| Total net claims paid | $ | 132,227 |
| | $ | 215,948 |
| | $ | 390,380 |
|
| | | | | | |
Total average net primary claim paid (1) (3) | $ | 49.0 |
| | $ | 53.7 |
| | $ | 50.8 |
|
| | | | | | |
Average direct primary claim paid (3) (4) | $ | 50.0 |
| | $ | 54.4 |
| | $ | 51.1 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Net of reinsurance recoveries. |
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| |
(2) | Includes payments to commute mortgage insurance coverage on certain performing and non-performing loans. For 2019 and 2017, includes payments that, as expected, were made in connection with the settlement of the Freddie Mac Agreement, as well as payments to commute mortgage insurance coverage on certain performing and non-performing loans on which we had Pool Insurance risk. |
| |
(3) | Calculated without giving effect to the impact of captive reinsurance terminations and other commutations.
|
| |
(4) | Before reinsurance recoveries.
|
Other Operating Expenses. The increasedecrease in other operating expenses for 2019,2020, as compared to 2018,2019, is primarily due toto: (i) a decrease in technology-related expenses; (ii) a decrease in compensation expense in 2020, including variable and share-based compensation; and (iii) an increase in ceding commissions. This decrease in expense was partially offset by higher allocated corporate operating expenses. This increase was partially offset by an increase in ceding commissions related to higher earned premiums on policies covered under our Single Premium QSR Program.
Our expense ratio on a net premiums earned basis represents our Mortgage Insurance segment’s operating expenses (which include policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses, as well as allocated corporate operating expenses), expressed as a percentage of net premiums earned. Our expense ratio was 22.2%21.2% for 2019,2020, compared to 23.9%22.1% for 2018.2019. The increasedecrease in net premiums earnedother operating expenses during 20192020 was the primary driver of the decrease in the expense ratio as compared to 2018.2019.
Interest Expense.The increase in interest expense for 2020, as compared to 2019, primarily reflects an increase in our senior notes outstanding in 2020. This increase in interest expense was partially offset by the positive impact of our net reduction in senior notes outstanding in 2019. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our senior notes. Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
The increase in our Mortgage segment’s adjusted pretax operating income for 2019, compared to 2018, primarily reflected an increase in net premiums earned, due primarily to an increase in IIF and also impacted by a $32.9 million cumulative adjustment in 2019 related to an update to the amortization rates used to recognize revenue for Single Premium Policies, as further discussed above in “—Net Premiums Written and Earned”. Partially offsetting this item were increases in: (i) provision for losses; (ii) other operating expenses; and (iii) interest expense allocated by Radian Group.
Results of Operations—ServicesReal Estate
The following table summarizes our Services segment’s resultsAs noted above in “Results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018Operations—Consolidated” and 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ Change |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Favorable (Unfavorable) |
| (In millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
Adjusted pretax operating income (loss) (1) | $ | (14.3 | ) | | $ | (27.1 | ) | | $ | (33.8 | ) | | $ | 12.8 |
| | $ | 6.7 |
|
| Net premiums earned—insurance | 11.1 |
| | 7.3 |
| | — |
| | 3.8 |
| | 7.3 |
|
| Services revenue | 158.6 |
| | 148.2 |
| | 161.8 |
| | 10.4 |
| | (13.6 | ) |
| Cost of services | 109.2 |
| | 98.7 |
| | 105.8 |
| | (10.5 | ) | | 7.1 |
|
| Gross profit on services | 49.4 |
| | 49.5 |
| | 56.0 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (6.5 | ) |
Other operating expenses (2) | 74.7 |
| | 65.2 |
| | 65.3 |
| | (9.5 | ) | | 0.1 |
|
| Interest expense | — |
| | 17.8 |
| | 17.7 |
| | 17.8 |
| | (0.1 | ) |
______________________
| |
(1) | Our senior management uses adjusted pretax operating income (loss) as our primary measure to evaluate the fundamental financial performance of each of our business segments. Seeas further discussed in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
(2) | Includes allocation of corporate operating expenses of $16.9 million, $12.0 million and $14.3 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
Our Services segment offers a broad array of real estate, title and mortgage servicesNotes to market participants across the mortgage and real estate value chain. These services are primarily provided to mortgage lenders, financial institutions, investors and government entities. In addition,Consolidated Financial Statements, we provide title insurance and settlement services to mortgage lenders as well as directly to consumers. Priormade certain modifications to our January 2020 sale of Clayton,segment reporting in 2020. These changes to our mortgage services included transaction management services such as loan review, RMBS securitization and distressed asset reviews, as well as servicer and loan surveillance.reportable segments have been reflected in our Real Estate segment operating results for all periods presented. See “Item 1. Business—Services—ServicesReal Estate—Real Estate Business Overview—Services Offered”Offered” and Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the ServicesReal Estate segment and the January 2020 sale of Clayton.Clayton, as well as other changes impacting our reportable segments in 2020.
The following table summarizes our Real Estate segment’s results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ Change |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Favorable (Unfavorable) |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 vs. 2019 | | 2019 vs. 2018 |
Adjusted pretax operating income (loss) (1) | | $ | (23.2) | | | $ | (18.0) | | | $ | (4.0) | | | $ | (5.2) | | | $ | (14.0) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net premiums earned | | 22.6 | | | 12.0 | | | 7.3 | | | 10.6 | | | 4.7 | |
| Services revenue | | 79.5 | | | 76.9 | | | 79.1 | | | 2.6 | | | (2.2) | |
| Cost of services | | 61.5 | | | 56.6 | | | 47.0 | | | (4.9) | | | (9.6) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Other operating expenses (2) | | 62.3 | | | 50.2 | | | 42.9 | | | (12.1) | | | (7.3) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Our senior management uses adjusted pretax operating income (loss) as our primary measure to evaluate the fundamental financial performance of each of our business segments. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Adjusted Pretax Operating Income (Loss)(2). Includes allocation of corporate operating expenses of $12.8 million, $10.2 million and $8.4 million for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019
Our ServicesReal Estate segment’s adjusted pretax operating loss for 20192020 was $14.3$23.2 million, compared to an adjusted pretax operating loss of $27.1$18.0 million in 2018.2019. The decreaseincrease in our adjusted pretax operating loss for 2019,in 2020, as compared to 2018,2019, was driven by a decreaseprimarily related to the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operating environment for certain business lines and continued strategic investments focused on our title and digital real estate businesses. Such investments contributed to an increase in interest expense, as discussed below,total expenses, which was partially offset by an increase in operating expense.
Net Premiums Earned-Insurance. Netnet premiums earned and services revenue attributable to the strong origination growth in our title insurance business. The increase in other operating expenses for 2019 increased2020 compared to 2018, as a result of the acquisition of the title insurance business2019 was also due in March 2018 and the inclusion of its operations.
Services Revenue. Services revenue increased for 2019, as comparedpart to 2018, primarily due to the inclusion of revenue from businesses acquired in 2018 since their respective dates of acquisition.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cost of Services. OurThe increase in our adjusted pretax operating loss for 2019, as compared to 2018, was driven by an increase in other operating expenses and cost of services is primarily affecteddue to an increase in the number of employees and other similar initiatives to support growth, partially offset by an increase in net premiums earned from our level of services revenue and the mix of services provided. The level of these costs may also fluctuate if market rates of compensation change, or if there is decreased availability or a loss of qualified employees.title insurance business.
Other Operating Expenses. Other operating expenses for 2019 were impacted by businesses acquired in 2018 and the resulting inclusion of other operating expenses for these businesses from their respective dates of acquisition. Other operating expenses also include other selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation, and allocations of corporate general and administrative expenses. See “Results
Results of Operations—Consolidated—All Other Operating Expenses.”
Interest Expense. Effective January 1, 2019, the Clayton Intercompany Note was repaid using proceeds from an additional capital contribution from Radian Group. As a result of the intercompany note repayment, the Services segment no longer incurs interest expense on the intercompany note.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We have various contractual obligations that are recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes certainour All Other results of our contractual obligations and commitments, including our expected claim payments on insurance policies and interest payments on debt obligations, as ofoperations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ Change |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Favorable (Unfavorable) |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2020 vs. 2019 | | 2019 vs. 2018 |
Adjusted pretax operating income (loss) (1) | | $ | 3.8 | | | $ | 19.8 | | | $ | (21.2) | | | $ | (16.0) | | | $ | 41.0 | |
| Services revenue | | 12.5 | | | 71.0 | | | 62.6 | | | (58.5) | | | 8.4 | |
| Net investment income | | 16.5 | | | 19.6 | | | 3.8 | | | (3.1) | | | 15.8 | |
| Cost of services | | 15.6 | | | 47.6 | | | 48.9 | | | 32.0 | | | 1.3 | |
| Other operating expenses | | 10.1 | | | 23.0 | | | 21.1 | | | 12.9 | | | (1.9) | |
| Interest expense | | — | | | — | | | 17.8 | | | — | | | 17.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Our senior management uses adjusted pretax operating income (loss) as our primary measure to evaluate the future periods in which such obligations are expected to be settled in cash. Additional details regarding these obligations are provided infundamental financial performance of each of the narrative following the table and in theCompany’s business segments. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements that are referencedStatements.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019
Adjusted pretax operating income decreased in the table.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Payments Due by Period | |
| (In thousands) | Total | | 2020 | | 2021-2022 | | 2023-2024 | | Thereafter | |
Long-term debt obligations (Note 12) (1) | $ | 1,170,717 |
| | $ | 47,123 |
| | $ | 84,375 |
| | $ | 534,375 |
|
| $ | 504,844 |
| |
Lease obligations (Note 13) (2) | 95,486 |
| | 10,622 |
| | 19,955 |
| | 20,000 |
| | 44,909 |
| |
| Purchase obligations | 4,441 |
| | 2,069 |
| | 2,372 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Other long-term liabilities reflected on our consolidated balance sheets (3) (4) | 404,765 |
| | 109,954 |
| | 166,877 |
| | 127,934 |
| | — |
| |
| Total | $ | 1,675,409 |
| | $ | 169,768 |
| | $ | 273,579 |
| | $ | 682,309 |
| | $ | 549,753 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Includes contractual principal and related interest for $450 million of Senior Notes due 2024 and $450 million of Senior Notes due 2027, both of which may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time prior to maturity. |
| |
(2) | Includes $3.8 million for operating leases that were divested as part of the sale of Clayton. |
| |
(3) | Includes our reserve for losses and LAE which reflects the application of accounting policies described below in “Critical Accounting Policies—Reserve for Losses and LAE.” The payments due by period are based on management’s estimates and assume that all of the loss reserves included in the table will2020 as compared to 2019 primarily as a result in claim payments, net of expected recoveries.
|
| |
(4) | Excludes approximately $38.5 million in potential additional liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2019. The timing or magnitude of any potential payments is unknown. |
Other Contractual Obligations and Commitments
In the ordinary course of business, Radian enters into agreements pursuant to which we may be obligated under specified circumstances or upon the occurrence of certain eventsallocated adjustments, which contributed to indemnify the counterparties with respectreduction in services revenue from 2019 in addition to certain matters. The terms and amount of indemnification are negotiated on a transaction by transaction basis, but generally the circumstancesimpact of the transaction and/orsale of Clayton discussed below. Also contributing to the contract provisions are such that we believedecrease in adjusted pretax operating income is a decrease in net investment income. Lower investment yields, partially offset by higher average investment balances, resulted in decreases in investment income for 2020, compared to 2019. Our higher investment balances were primarily a result of investing the exposureproceeds from our May 2020 issuance of Senior Notes due 2025. In addition, services revenue, cost of services and other operating expenses all declined in 2020 as compared to 2019 as a result of the sale of Clayton in January 2020; however, the net impact of the sale was not material liability is remote.to the trend in adjusted pretax operating income.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As ofYear Ended December 31, 2019 we had not entered into any material off-balance sheet arrangementsCompared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Adjusted pretax operating income increased in 2019 compared to an adjusted pretax operating loss in 2018 primarily as defineda result of: (i) a decrease in Item 303(a)(4)interest expense, as a result of Regulation S-K, other than those below:
Securities Lending Agreements
We participatethe Clayton Intercompany Note repayment, and (ii) an increase in securities lending agreementsnet investment income. Higher average investment balances, combined with higher investment yields, resulted in increases in investment income for 2019, compared to 2018. Our higher investment balances were primarily a result of investing the purpose of increasing the yield on our investment securities portfolio with minimal incremental risk. Pursuant to these agreements, we loan to third-party borrowers certain securities that are held as part of our investment portfolio. For a complete discussion of our securities lending agreements, including the effect of these agreements on our liquiditylarge Extraordinary Distributions received by Radian Group from Radian Guaranty in 2019 and risks related to these agreements, see2018. See Note 616 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”
88
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Variable Interest Entities
In April 2019 and November 2018, Radian Guaranty entered into fully collateralized reinsurance agreements with Eagle Re 2019-1 and Eagle Re 2018-1, respectively, both unaffiliated special purpose reinsurers domiciled in Bermuda. The Eagle Re Issuers are special purpose VIEs that are not consolidated in our consolidated financial statements because we do not have the unilateral power to direct those activities that are significant to their economic performance.
For additional information about Eagle Re 2019-1 and Eagle Re 2018-1 and our other reinsurance arrangements, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Segregated Funds Held for Others
Through Radian Title Insurance, we maintain escrow deposits as a service to our customers. Amounts held in escrow and excluded from assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets totaled $2.0 million as of December 31, 2019. These amounts were held at third-party financial institutions and not considered assets of the Company. Should one or more of the financial institutions at which escrow deposits are maintained fail, there is no guarantee that we would recover the funds deposited, whether through Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation coverage or otherwise. In the event of any such failure, we could be held liable for the disposition of these funds owned by third parties.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:activities.
| | | | | | | | | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | Year Ended December 31, | |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | Net cash provided by (used in): | |
| Operating activities | $ | 694,431 |
| | $ | 677,786 |
| | $ | 360,575 |
| Operating activities | | $ | 658,434 | | | $ | 694,431 | | | $ | 677,786 | |
| Investing activities | (302,049 | ) | | (689,414 | ) | | (201,492 | ) | Investing activities | | (883,180) | | | (302,049) | | | (689,414) | |
| Financing activities | (403,106 | ) | | 22,386 |
| | (125,084 | ) | Financing activities | | 222,618 | | | (403,106) | | | 22,386 | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | (4 | ) | | — |
| | 431 |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | | — | | | (4) | | | — | |
| | Increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash | $ | (10,728 | ) | | $ | 10,758 |
| | $ | 34,430 |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash | | $ | (2,128) | | | $ | (10,728) | | | $ | 10,758 | |
| | | | | | | |
Operating Activities. Our most significant source of operating cash flows is generally from premiums received from our mortgage insurance policies, while our most significant uses of operating cash flows are generally for claims paid on our mortgage insurance policies and our operating expenses. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $658.4 million for 2020, compared to $694.4 million for 2019, compared to $677.8 million in 2018.2019. This increasedecrease was principally the result of cash received from the IRS in the first quarter of 2019, which included a $57.2 million refund that was previously on deposit with the IRS, partially offset by a reduction in claims paid in 2019, partially offset by: (i) ceded premiums paid under the Excess-of-Loss Program in 2019 and (ii) an increase in net cash paid related to federal income taxes, including our purchases of U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds in 2019.2020.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities decreasedincreased in 2019,2020, compared to 2018,2019, primarily as a result of: (i) an increase in purchases, net of proceeds from sales, net of purchases, of fixed-maturitiesfixed-maturity investments available for sale; (ii) a decrease in net purchasesproceeds from sales of short-term investments;trading securities; and (iii) an increase in proceeds from sales of trading securities. These changes were partially offset by a decrease in proceeds from sales, net of purchases of equity securities.short-term investments.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for 2020 was $222.6 million, as compared to net cash used in financing activities for 2019 wasof $403.1 million, as compared to net cash provided bymillion. For 2020, our primary financing activities included the issuance of Senior Notes due 2025, partially offset by: (i) repurchases of our common shares and (ii) an increase in dividends paid. See Notes 12 and14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for 2018 of $22.4 million.additional information regarding our senior note issuance, share repurchases and increased dividends. For 2019, our primary financing activities included: (i) an increase in repurchases of our common shares and (ii) repayments and repurchases of senior notes exceeding related issuances. For 2018, our primary financing activities included an increase in secured borrowings from the FHLB, partially offset by an increase in purchases of our common shares.
See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows” for additional information.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Investment Portfolio
At December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the following tables include $57.5 million and $66.4 million, respectively, of securities loaned to third-party borrowers under securities lending agreements, which are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our investment portfolio, including our securities lending agreements.
The composition of our investment portfolio, presented as a percentage of overall fair value at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, was as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Portfolio Diversification | | December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| ($ in millions) | | Fair
Value | | Percent | | Fair
Value | | Percent |
| Corporate bonds and commercial paper | | $ | 3,527.7 | | | 51.5 | % | | $ | 2,554.8 | | | 44.6 | % |
| RMBS | | 846.9 | | | 12.4 | | | 795.5 | | | 13.9 | |
| CMBS | | 715.5 | | | 10.5 | | | 623.2 | | | 10.9 | |
| CLO | | 568.6 | | | 8.3 | | | 462.6 | | | 8.1 | |
State and municipal obligations (1) | | 307.5 | | | 4.5 | | | 260.4 | | | 4.5 | |
| Money market instruments and certificates of deposit | | 270.0 | | | 3.9 | | | 203.5 | | | 3.5 | |
| Other ABS | | 252.7 | | | 3.7 | | | 316.1 | | | 5.5 | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | 174.1 | | | 2.5 | | | 342.1 | | | 6.0 | |
| Equity securities | | 172.5 | | | 2.5 | | | 157.7 | | | 2.7 | |
| Other investments | | 10.4 | | | 0.2 | | | 9.3 | | | 0.3 | |
| Total | | $ | 6,845.9 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,725.2 | | | 100.0 | % |
(1)Primarily consists of taxable state and municipal investments.
The following table shows the scheduled maturities of the securities held in our investment portfolio at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Portfolio Scheduled Maturity | | December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| ($ in millions) | | Fair
Value | | Percent | | Fair
Value | | Percent |
| Short-term investments | | $ | 618.0 | | | 9.0 | % | | $ | 533.4 | | | 9.3 | % |
Due in one year or less (1) | | 132.5 | | | 1.9 | | | 166.8 | | | 2.9 | |
Due after one year through five years (1) | | 1,165.0 | | | 17.0 | | | 961.1 | | | 16.8 | |
Due after five years through 10 years (1) | | 1,357.5 | | | 19.8 | | | 1,134.1 | | | 19.8 | |
Due after 10 years (1) | | 1,014.9 | | | 14.8 | | | 570.6 | | | 10.0 | |
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities (2) | | 2,383.5 | | | 34.9 | | | 2,197.4 | | | 38.4 | |
Equity securities (3) | | 172.5 | | | 2.5 | | | 157.7 | | | 2.7 | |
Other investments (3) | | 2.0 | | | 0.1 | | | 4.1 | | | 0.1 | |
| Total | | $ | 6,845.9 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,725.2 | | | 100.0 | % |
(1)Actual maturities may differ as a result of calls before scheduled maturity.
(2)RMBS, CMBS, CLO and other ABS are shown separately, as they are not due at a single maturity date.
(3)No stated maturity date.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following table provides the ratings of our investment portfolio, presented as a percentage of overall fair value, as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Portfolio by Rating | | December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| ($ in millions) | | Fair
Value | | Percent | | Fair
Value | | Percent |
| U.S. government / AAA | | $ | 2,420.6 | | | 35.4 | % | | $ | 2,339.9 | | | 40.9 | % |
| AA | | 1,095.5 | | | 16.0 | | | 932.6 | | | 16.3 | |
| A | | 2,128.6 | | | 31.1 | | | 1,506.5 | | | 26.3 | |
| BBB | | 999.7 | | | 14.6 | | | 784.4 | | | 13.7 | |
| BB and below | | 24.0 | | | 0.3 | | | — | | | — | |
| Equity securities | | 172.5 | | | 2.5 | | | 157.7 | | | 2.7 | |
| Other invested assets | | 5.0 | | | 0.1 | | | 4.1 | | | 0.1 | |
| Total | | $ | 6,845.9 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 5,725.2 | | | 100.0 | % |
Liquidity Analysis—Holding Company
Radian Group serves as the holding company for our insurance and otheroperating subsidiaries and does not have any operations of its own. At December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Group had available, either directly or through an unregulated subsidiary,subsidiaries, unrestricted cash and liquid investments of $652.6 million.$1.1 billion. Available liquidity at December 31, 20192020 excludes certain additional cash and liquid investments that have been advanced to Radian Group from our subsidiaries to pay their allocated share offor corporate expenses and interest payments. In addition, this amount does not take into consideration transactions subsequent toTotal liquidity, which includes our undrawn $267.5 million unsecured revolving credit facility, as described below, was $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2019, including: (i) the share repurchases of Radian Group common stock, described below, and (ii) intercompany capital actions, which collectively resulted in a net increase in2020.
During 2020, Radian Group’s available liquidity increased by $450.1 million, due primarily to net proceeds of approximately $199 million.$515.6 million from the issuance of Senior Notes due 2025 (see “—Capitalization—Holding Company” below for details) and Radian Reinsurance’s return of $465 million of capital to Radian Group in January 2020, as approved by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. The effects of the debt issuance and return of capital were partially offset by the cost of share repurchases and dividends, as described below, and the transfer of $200 million of cash and marketable securities to Radian Guaranty in exchange for a surplus note in the same amount. See “—Mortgage Insurance”Mortgage” below for additional information on our recent intercompany capital actions.information.
In addition to available cash and marketable securities, Radian Group’s principal sources of cash to fund future liquidity needs include: (i) payments made to Radian Group by its subsidiaries under expense- and tax-sharing arrangements; (ii) net investment income earned on its cash and marketable securities; (iii) to the extent available, dividends or other distributions from our subsidiaries; and (iv) amounts, if any, that Radian Guaranty is able to repay under the Surplus Notes. Radian Group also has in place a $267.5 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of bank lenders.lenders, which has a maturity date of January 18, 2022. At December 31, 2019,2020, the full $267.5 million remains undrawn and available under the facility. Subject to certain limitations, borrowings under the credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, capital contributions to Radian Group’sour insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries as well as growth initiatives. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on ourthe unsecured revolving credit facility.
We expect Radian Group’s principal liquidity demands for the next 12 months to be: (i) the payment of corporate expenses, including taxes; (ii) interest payments on our outstanding debt obligations; and (iii) subject to approval by our board of directors and our ongoing assessment of our financial condition and potential capital demands in our Mortgage business, the payment of quarterly dividends on our common stock which we recently increased to $0.125 per share; and (iv) the repurchasespotential repurchase of Radian Groupshares of our common stock, including pursuant to the current share repurchase authorization, as described below.below, for which $198.9 million in authorization remains outstanding.
In addition to our ongoing short-term liquidity needs discussed above, our most significant need for liquidity beyond the next 12 months is the repayment of $900 million$1.4 billion aggregate principal amount of our senior debt due in future years. See “—“—Capitalization—Holding Company”Company” below for details of our debt maturity profile. Radian Group’s liquidity demands for the next 12 months or in future periods could also include: (i) early repurchases or redemptions of portions of our debt obligations andobligations; (ii) the repurchase of shares of our common stock; (iii) potential additional investments to support our business strategy, includingstrategy; and (iv) potential additional capital contributions to our subsidiaries, including due to the continuing impact that the COVID-19 pandemic could have on the liquidity, results of operations and possible acquisitions or investmentsfinancial condition of Radian Group and our subsidiaries. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the economy, including the significant increase in unemployment, we experienced a material increase in new businesses.defaults in the second quarter of 2020, and to a lesser extent in the second half of 2020, substantially all related to defaulted loans subject to forbearance programs implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. While we expect it will take a number of months or years before any new defaults resulting from the pandemic would require a claim payment, Radian Group may be required to contribute additional capital to support Radian Guaranty’s PMIERs Cushion due to increased minimum asset requirements on defaulted loans. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” including “—Radian Group’s sources of
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
liquidity may be insufficient to fund its obligations” and “—Radian Guaranty may fail to maintain its eligibility status with the GSEs, and the additional capital required to support Radian Guaranty’s eligibility could reduce our available liquidity” for additional discussion about the elevated risks and uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and the potential impact to Radian Guaranty’s Minimum Required Assets. See also Notes 1 and 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Overview—COVID-19 Impacts” for further information.
If Radian Group’s current sources of liquidity are insufficient to fund its obligations, or if we otherwise decide to increase our liquidity position, Radian Group may seek additional capital, including by incurring additional debt, issuing additional equity, or selling assets, which we may not be able to do on favorable terms, if at all.
Share Repurchases. During 2019, Radian Group’s available liquidity decreased by $61.5 million, due primarily to the cost of share repurchases2020 and the net impact of a series of debt transactions designed to reduce our total debt outstanding, as described below, the effects of which were partially offset by intercompany capital actions, including Radian Guaranty’s return of $375 million in capital to Radian Group in April 2019, as approved by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. See “—Mortgage Insurance” below and Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on capital requirements and dividend restrictions that impact our mortgage insurance subsidiaries.
Share Repurchases. During 2019 and 2018, the Company repurchased 13.511.0 million shares and 3.013.5 million shares of Radian Group common stock, respectively, under programs authorized by Radian Group’s board of directors, at a total cost of $300.2$226.3 million and $50.1$300.2 million, respectively, including commissions. Subsequent to December 31, 2019,Effective March 19, 2020, the Company purchased an additional 2.7 million shares of its common stocktemporarily suspended purchases under its share repurchase program and canceled its then current 10b5-1 plan in response to uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Radian may initiate a new 10b5-1 plan at a total costits discretion in the future. The expiration date of $65.8the current share repurchase authorization remains August 31, 2021 and the Company had $198.9 million including commissions.of the share repurchase authorization remaining at December 31, 2020. See Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional informationdetails on our share repurchase programs, including remaining purchase authority available under our current program.programs.
DividendsDividends. . In 2019 and 2018, our quarterly common stock dividend was $0.0025 per share. Effective February 13, 2020, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized an increase to the Company’s quarterly cash dividend to $0.125 per share. Based on our current outstanding shares of common stock, we would require approximately $101$96 million in the aggregate to pay our quarterly dividends for the next 12 months. Radian Group is not subject to any limitations on its ability to pay dividends except those generally applicable to corporations that are incorporated in Delaware. Delaware corporation law provides that dividends are only payable out of a corporation’s capital surplus or (subject to certain limitations) recent net profits. As of December 31, 2019,2020, our capital surplus was $4.0$4.2 billion, representing our dividend limitation under Delaware law.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysisfuture quarterly cash dividends remains subject to the board of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Corporate Expenses and Interest ExpenseExpense. . Radian Group has expense-sharing arrangements in place with its principal operating subsidiaries that require those subsidiaries to pay their allocated share of certain holding-companyholding-company-level expenses, including interest payments on Radian Group’s outstanding debt obligations. Payments under these arrangements of corporateCorporate expenses and interest expense on Radian Group’s debt obligations allocated under these arrangements during 2019 were $1212020 of $129.9 million and $54$68.9 million, respectively.respectively, were substantially all reimbursed by our subsidiaries. We expect substantially all of our holding company expenses to continue to be reimbursed by our subsidiaries under our expense-sharing arrangements. The expense-sharing arrangements between Radian Group and our mortgage insurance subsidiaries, as amended, have been approved by the applicable insurance departments,Pennsylvania Insurance Department, but such approval may be modified or revoked at any time.
Taxes. Pursuant to our tax-sharing agreements, our operating subsidiaries pay Radian Group an amount equal to any federal income tax the subsidiary would have paid on a standalone basis if they were not part of our consolidated tax return. As a result, from time to time, under the provisions of our tax-sharing agreements, Radian Group may pay to or receive from its operating subsidiariessubsidiaries amounts that differ from Radian Group’s consolidated federal tax payment obligation. In 2018, under the provisions of our tax-sharing agreements,During 2020, Radian Group received cash $17.4 million of net tax-sharing agreement payments from certain of its subsidiaries that were $222 million in excess of Radian Group’s 2018 consolidated federal tax payment obligations, due primarily to the benefit in our consolidated tax return of applying certain NOL carryforwards and other tax credits that had been previously utilized by our subsidiaries on a standalone basis. For 2019, these excess tax payments from our subsidiaries were $28 million.operating subsidiaries.
In July 2018, Radian finalized a settlement with the IRS which resolved the issues and concluded all disputes related to the IRS Matter. During 2018, under the terms of the settlement, Radian utilized its qualified deposits with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to settle its $31 million obligation to the IRS, and in 2019, the IRS refunded to Radian the remaining $57.2 million that was previously on deposit, resulting in a reduction of our current federal income tax receivable. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the IRS Matter.
Capitalization—Holding Company
The following table presents our holding company capital structure:structure.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Debt: | | | | |
| Senior Notes due 2024 | | $ | 450,000 | | | $ | 450,000 | |
| Senior Notes due 2025 | | 525,000 | | | — | |
| Senior Notes due 2027 | | 450,000 | | | 450,000 | |
| Deferred debt costs on senior notes | | (19,326) | | | (12,890) | |
| Revolving credit facility | | — | | | — | |
| Total | | 1,405,674 | | | 887,110 | |
| Stockholders’ equity | | 4,284,353 | | | 4,048,723 | |
| Total capitalization | | $ | 5,690,027 | | | $ | 4,935,833 | |
| Debt-to-capital ratio | | 24.7 | % | | 18.0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| Debt: | | | |
| 5.500% Senior Notes due 2019 | $ | — |
| | $ | 158,623 |
|
| 5.250% Senior Notes due 2020 | — |
| | 234,126 |
|
| 7.000% Senior Notes due 2021 | — |
| | 197,661 |
|
| 4.500% Senior Notes due 2024 | 450,000 |
| | 450,000 |
|
| 4.875% Senior Notes due 2027 | 450,000 |
| | — |
|
| Deferred debt costs on senior notes | (12,890 | ) | | (10,062 | ) |
| Revolving credit facility | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | 887,110 |
| | 1,030,348 |
|
| | | | |
| Stockholders’ equity | 4,048,723 |
| | 3,488,715 |
|
| | | | |
| Total capitalization | $ | 4,935,833 |
| | $ | 4,519,063 |
|
| | | | |
| Debt-to-capital ratio | 18.0 | % | | 22.8 | % |
Radian’s holding company debt-to-capital ratio decreased to 18.0% at December 31, 2019, from 22.8% at December 31, 2018. During 2019, we reduced our total debt outstanding and improved our debt maturity profile by completing the following transactions:
repayment at maturity of $158.6 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Notes due 2019;
the issuance of $450 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2027; and
tender offers and the subsequent redemptions that together resulted in the repayment of the remaining aggregate principal amounts of $234.1 million and $197.7 million of our Senior Notes due 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Stockholders’ equity increased by $560.0 million from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019. The net increase in stockholders’ equity resulted primarily from: (i) our net income of $672.3 million for 2019 and (ii) net unrealized gains on
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Stockholders’ equity increased by $235.6 million from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020. The net increase in stockholders’ equity resulted primarily from: (i) our net income of $393.6 million for 2020 and (ii) net unrealized gains on investments of $171.5$153.3 million. These items were partially offset by shares repurchased under our share repurchase programs at a cost of $300.2$226.3 million, including commissions.commissions, and dividend and dividend equivalents of $98.8 million.
We regularly evaluate opportunities, based on market conditions, to finance our operations by accessing the capital markets or entering into other types of financing arrangements with institutional and other lenders and financing sources, and consider various measures to improve our capital and liquidity positions, as well as to strengthen our balance sheet, and improve Radian Group’s debt maturity profile.profile and maintain adequate liquidity for our operations. In the past we have repurchased andor exchanged, prior to maturity, some of our outstanding debt, and in the future, we may from time to time seek to redeem, repurchase or exchange for other securities, or otherwise restructure or refinance some or all of our outstanding debt prior to maturity in the open market or through other public or private transactions, including pursuant to one or more tender offers or through any combination of the foregoing, as circumstances may allow. The timing or amount of any potential transactions will depend on a number of factors, including market opportunities and our views regarding our capital and liquidity positions and potential future needs.needs, including as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. There can be no assurance that any such transactions will be completed on favorable terms, or at all.
In May 2020, we issued $525 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2025 and received net proceeds of $515.6 million. These notes mature on March 15, 2025 and bear interest at a rate of 6.625% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, which interest payments commenced on September 15, 2020. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about these notes and our other senior notes.
Mortgage Insurance
The principal demands for liquidity in our mortgage insuranceMortgage business currently include: (i) the payment of claims, and potential claim settlement transactions, net of reinsurance; (ii) expenses (including those allocated from Radian Group); (iii) repayments of FHLB advances; (iv) interest expense and repayments, if any, associated with the Surplus Notes; and (v) taxes, including potential additional purchases of U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds. See Notes 10 and 1816 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to these non-interest bearing instruments. The principal sources of liquidity in our mortgage insuranceMortgage business currently include insurance premiums, net investment income and cash flows from: (i) investment sales and maturities; (ii) FHLB advances; and (iii) capital contributions from Radian Group. We believe that the operating cash flows generated by each of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries will provide these subsidiaries with a substantial portion of the funds necessary to satisfy their needs for the foreseeable future. However, see “Overview—COVID-19 Impacts” and Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion about the elevated risks and uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including the impact on our PMIERs Cushion.
As of December 31, 2019,2020, our Mortgage Insurance segmentmortgage insurance subsidiaries maintained claims paying resources of $4.7$5.2 billion on a statutory basis, which consists of contingency reserves, statutory policyholders’ surplus, premiums received but not yet earned and loss reserves. In addition, our reinsurance programs are designed to provide additional claims-paying resources during times of economic stress and elevated losses. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.information about our reinsurance programs.
Radian Guaranty’s Risk-to-capital as of December 31, 20192020 was 13.612.7 to 1. Our combined Risk-to-capital, which represents the consolidated Risk-to-capital measure for all of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries, was 12.3 to 1 as of December 31, 2019. Radian Guaranty is not expected to need additional capital to satisfy state insurance regulatory requirements in their current form. At December 31, 2020, Radian Guaranty had statutory policyholders’ surplus of $481.5 million. This balance includes a $210.9 million benefit from U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, which mortgage guaranty insurers such as Radian Guaranty may purchase in order to be eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations, related to amounts required to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves. See Note 1816 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, “Overview—COVID-19 Impacts” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for additionalmore information including information concerningabout these bonds and the risks associated with potential changescorporate tax rate increases, our statutory and PMIERs requirements and the potential effects of increased defaults due to the Model Act.COVID-19 pandemic.
Private mortgage insurers, including Radian Guaranty, are required to comply with the PMIERs to remain approved insurers of loans purchased by the GSEs. Radian Guaranty currently is an approved mortgage insurer under the PMIERs. At December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Guaranty’s Available Assets under the current PMIERs financial requirements totaled approximately $3.6$4.7 billion, resulting in excess available resourcesa PMIERs Cushion of $1.3 billion, or a “cushion” of $804 million, or 28%40%, over its Minimum Required Assets of $2.8$3.4 billion.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following chart below summarizes our “cushion” under the PMIERs Cushion and Radian’s excess available resources as of December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, calculated based on the PMIERs financial requirements in effect for each date shown. Our excess
| | |
| PMIERs Excess Available Resources |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ in millions (1)) | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 |
| ¢ | Credit Facility | $ | 268 | | 8 | % | $268 | 9 | % | $268 | 9 | % |
| ¢ | Radian Group Liquidity, Net (2) | 1,068 | 32 | | 618 | 22 | | 679 | 23 | |
| ¢ | PMIERs Cushion (3) | 1,338 | 40 | | 804 | 28 | | 567 | 19 | |
| Total | $2,674 | 80 | % | $1,690 | 59 | % | $1,514 | 51 | % |
| | | | | | | |
_______________________________________________________________________(1)Percentages represent the values shown as a percentage of Minimum Required Assets under the applicable PMIERs financial requirements in effect for the dates shown.
(2)Represents Radian Group’s available resources include ourliquidity, net of the $35 million minimum liquidity requirement under the unsecured revolving credit facility and holding company liquidity, which may be utilized to enhancefacility.
(3)Represents Radian Guaranty’s excess, or “cushion,” of Available Assets over its Minimum Required Assets, calculated in accordance with the PMIERs cushion. financial requirements in effect for each date shown.
Our cushion increasedPMIERs Cushion at December 31, 2020, includes a benefit from the current broad-based application of the Disaster Related Capital Charge that has reduced the total amount of Minimum Required Assets that Radian Guaranty otherwise would have been required to hold against pandemic-related defaults as of December 31, 2019,2020 by approximately $650.0 million, taking into consideration our existing risk distribution structures. We expect that application of the Disaster Related Capital Charge will continue to materially reduce Radian Guaranty’s PMIERs Minimum Required Assets; however, the benefit that Radian Guaranty currently is receiving from the Disaster Related Capital Charge is expected to diminish over time.
Under the terms of the temporary COVID-19 Amendment, unless extended by the GSEs, the COVID-19 Crisis Period is currently scheduled to end March 31, 2021. If this occurs, for new defaults going forward, the Disaster Related Capital Charge would only be applied to these defaults if they are subject to a COVID-19 forbearance plan. The Disaster Related Capital Charge would continue to apply to these defaults for as comparedlong as they remained in the COVID-19 forbearance plan.
With respect to 2018, primarily asexisting defaults occurring during the COVID-19 Crisis Period, the Disaster Related Capital Charge will continue to apply until: (i) they fail to enter a COVID-19 forbearance program within the period prescribed by the COVID-19 Amendment or (ii) for defaults subject to a COVID-19 forbearance plan, repayment plan or loan modification trial period, they exit the program, plan or trial period without curing the default status.
For all defaulted loans that continue to remain in forbearance, increased asset factors under the PMIERs are applied against defaulted loans based on the amount of time the loans remain in default, with increases taking place upon four, six and 12 missed monthly payments. As a result, notwithstanding the continued application of the Eagle Re 2019-1 excess-of-loss reinsurance agreement, partially offsetDisaster Related Capital Charge, the total amount of Minimum Required Assets we may be required to hold against defaulted loans will increase over time, including for loans subject to forbearance programs, because the 0.30 multiplier is applied to a higher base factor for the defaulting loans as they age.
Given the lack of an expiration date under the CARES Act, it is difficult to estimate how long the GSEs may continue to offer COVID-19 forbearance programs for new defaults. It is also difficult to assess how long the GSEs may continue to apply the temporary COVID-19 Amendment to new and existing defaults. See “Item 1. Business—Regulation—GSE Requirements” for more information about the Disaster Related Capital Charge that is currently being applied by the 2019 Extraordinary Distribution from Radian GuarantyGSEs to Radian Group. See Notes 8 and 18 of Notescertain nonperforming loans in response to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these transactions.the COVID-19 pandemic.
______________________
| |
(1) | Represents Radian Group’s liquidity, net of the $35 million minimum liquidity requirement under the unsecured revolving credit facility. |
| |
(2) | Represents Radian Guaranty’s excess of Available Assets over its Minimum Required Assets, calculated in accordance with the PMIERs financial requirements in effect at each date shown. PMIERs 1.0 was in effect for December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018; PMIERs 2.0 was in effect for December 31, 2019. |
| |
(3) | Percentages represent the values shownOur PMIERs Cushion as a percentage of Minimum Required Assets under the applicable PMIERs financial requirements in effect for the dates shown. |
As of December 31, 2019,2020 includes the coverage provided bybenefit from our reinsurance programs with third parties reduced Radian Guaranty’s Minimum Required Assets by $1.3 billion, which transactions include thoseagreements, including the 2020 agreements with Eagle Re 2018-12020-1 Ltd. and Eagle Re 2019-1. In2020-2 Ltd., effective February 2020 Radian Guaranty entered into an additional fully collateralized reinsurance agreement with Eagle Re 2020-1. This reinsurance agreement provides for up to $488.4 million of aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance coverage for mortgage insurance losses on new defaults on our existing portfolio of eligible Recurring Premium Policies with RIF of $9.9 billion that were issued between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2019. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our reinsurance programs.
In JanuaryOctober 2020, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approved the following actions:
the termination of the intercompany reinsurance agreement between Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance;
a $465 million return of capital from Radian Reinsurance to Radian Group as an Extraordinary Distribution; and
respectively. The PMIERs Cushion also includes the transfer of $200 million of cash and marketable securities from Radian Group to Radian Guaranty in exchange for a surplus note in the same amount.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively, for moreadditional information on these actions.
After consideration of the reinsurance agreement with Eagle Re 2020-1 Ltd. and Eagle Re 2020-2 Ltd. and these intercompany actions.
In addition to the netPMIERs Cushion held at Radian Guaranty, our excess available resources include our unsecured revolving credit facility and holding company liquidity. While these resources may be utilized to enhance Radian Guaranty’s PMIERs Cushion, the impact of the recent intercompany capital actions described above, Radian Guaranty’s excess of Available Assets over itsCOVID-19 pandemic could affect our ability to remain compliant with the PMIERs financial requirements as the increase in defaults and resulting increase to our Minimum Required Assets undercould reduce or potentially exhaust our PMIERs would have increased from 28% to 31%.Cushion or exceed our Available Assets. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for additional information.
Despite holdingEven though they hold assets abovein excess of the minimum statutory capital thresholds and PMIERs financial requirements, the ability of Radian’s mortgage insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends on their common stock is restricted by certain provisions of the insurance laws of Pennsylvania, their state of domicile. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, ordinary dividends and other distributions may only be paid out of an insurer’s positive unassigned surplus, measured as of the end of the prior fiscal year, unless the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approves the payment of dividends or other distributions from another source. In light of Radian Guaranty’s negative unassigned surplus related to operating losses in prior periods, and the ongoing need to set aside contingency reserves, and the current ongoing economic uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which increased losses in 2020 and could further increase losses in future periods, we do not anticipate that Radian Guaranty will be permitted under applicable insurance laws to pay ordinary dividends to Radian Group for the foreseeable future. As a result of its positive unassigned surplus as of December 31, 2020, Radian Reinsurance does have the ability to pay an ordinary dividend in 2021 up to $36.1 million. See Note 1816 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on statutory dividend restrictions and contingency reserve requirements.
Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, an insurer may request an Extraordinary Distribution, but payment is subject to the approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Radian Guaranty sought and received such approval to return capital by paying Extraordinary Distributions of $375 million and $450 million to Radian Group in 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance are both members of the FHLB. As members, they may borrow from the FHLB, subject to certain conditions, which include the requirements to post collateral and to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock. Advances from the FHLB may be used to provide low-cost, supplemental liquidity for various purposes, including to fund incremental investments. Radian’s current strategy includes using FHLB advances as financing to purchasefor general cash management purposes and for purchases of additional investment securities that have similar durations, for the purpose of generating additional earnings from our investment securities portfolio with minimallimited incremental risk. As of December 31, 2019,2020, there were $134.9$176.5 million of FHLB advances outstanding. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
ServicesReal Estate
As of December 31, 2019,2020, our ServicesReal Estate segment maintained cash and liquid investments totaling $39.6 million, which included restricted cash of $0.1$55.3 million, primarily held by Radian Title Insurance. The sale of Clayton, in January 2020, isdid not expected to have a material impact on our liquidity.
Title insurance companies, including Radian Title Insurance, are subject to comprehensive state regulations, including minimum net worth requirements. Radian Title Insurance was in compliance with its respective minimum net worth requirements at December 31, 2019.2020. In the event the cash flowflows from operations of the ServicesReal Estate segment isare not adequate to fund all of its needs, including the regulatory capital needs of Radian Title Insurance, Radian Group may provide additional funds to the Services segment in the form of an intercompany note or other capital contribution, and if needed for Radian Title Insurance subject to the approval of the Ohio Department of Insurance, if needed.Insurance. Additional capital support may also be required for potential investments in new business initiatives to support our strategy of growing our businesses.
Liquidity levels may fluctuate depending on the levels and contractual timing of our invoicing and the payment practices of our ServicesReal Estate clients, in combination with the timing of Services’our Real Estate segment’s payments for employee compensation and to external vendors. The amount, if any, and timing of the ServicesReal Estate segment’s dividend paying capacity will depend primarily on the amount of excess cash flow generated by the segment.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Ratings
Radian Group, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance have been assigned the ratings set forth in the chart below. We believe that ratings often are considered by others in assessing our credit strength and the financial strength of our primary mortgage insurancePrimary Mortgage Insurance subsidiaries. The following ratings have been independently assigned by third-party statistical rating organizations, are for informational purposes only and are subject to change. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—The current financial
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
strength ratings assigned to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries could weaken our competitive position.position and potential downgrades by rating agencies to these ratings and the ratings assigned to Radian Group could adversely affect the Company.”
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Moody’s (1) | | S&P (2) |
Radian Group | Ba1 | | BB+ |
Radian Guaranty | Baa1 |
| BBB+ |
Radian Reinsurance | N/A | | BBB+ |
Fitch (3)
______________________
| |
(1) | Based on the October 17, 2019 update, Moody’s outlook for Radian Group and Radian Guaranty currently is Stable. |
| Ba1 | | BB+ | | BBB- | |
(2) | Based on the September 30, 2019 update, S&P’s outlook for Radian Group, Radian Guaranty and | | Baa1 | | BBB+ | | A- | |
Radian Reinsurance is currently Stable. | | N/A | | BBB+ | | N/A | |
(1)Based on the July 14, 2020 update, Moody’s outlook for Radian Group and Radian Guaranty currently is Stable. (2)Based on the November 17, 2020 update, S&P’s outlook for Radian Group, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance is currently Negative.
(3)Based on the August 27, 2020 release, Fitch’s outlook for Radian Group and Radian Guaranty is currently Negative.
Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates
SEC guidance defines Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates as those policiesestimates made in accordance with GAAP that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operation of the registrant. These items require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. In preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, management has made estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
In preparing these financial statements, management has utilized available information, including our past history, industry standards and the current and projected economic and housing environments, among other factors, in forming its estimates, assumptions and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Because the use of estimates is inherent in GAAP, actual results could differ from those estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. A summary of the accounting policiesestimates that management believes are critical to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements is set forth below. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding our significant accounting policies.
InvestmentsMortgage Insurance Portfolio
We group fixed-maturity securities in our investment portfolio into one of three main categories: held to maturity, available for sale or trading securities. Fixed-maturity securities for which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, if any, are classified as held to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Trading securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of income. Investments in fixed-maturity securities not classified as held to maturity or trading securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses (net of tax) reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Equity securities consist of holdings in common stock, preferred stock and exchange traded funds, which, effective January 1, 2018, are all recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in income. Prior to the implementation of the update to the standard for the accounting of financial instruments effective January 1, 2018, the unrealized gains (losses) associated with equity securities that were available for sale were classified in accumulated other comprehensive income. Short-term investments consist of money market instruments, certificates of deposit and highly liquid, interest-bearing instruments with an original maturity of 12 months or less at the time of purchase. Amortization of premium and accretion of discount are calculated principally using the interest method over the term of the investment. Realized gains and losses on investments are recognized using the specific identification method.
We record an other-than-temporary impairment adjustment on a security with an unrealized loss if we intend to sell the impaired security, if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the impaired security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis, or if the present value of cash flows we expect to collect is less than the amortized cost basis of the security. If a sale is likely, the security is classified as other-than-temporarily impaired and the full amount of the impairment is recognized as a loss in the statement of operations. Otherwise, losses on securities that are other-than-temporarily impaired are separated into: (i) the portion of loss that represents the credit loss and (ii) the portion that is due to other factors. The credit loss portion is recognized as a loss in the statement of operations, while the loss due to other factors is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes. A credit loss is determined to exist if the present value of discounted cash
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
flows expected to be collected from the security is less than the amortized cost basis of the security. The present value of discounted cash flows is determined using the original yield of the security. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, we consider several factors in addition to the above, including, but not limited to, the following:
| |
• | the extent and the duration of the decline in value;
|
the reasons for the decline in value (e.g., credit event, interest-related or market fluctuations); and
the financial position, access to capital and near term prospects of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our estimated fair value measurements are intended to reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and the risks inherent in the inputs to the model. Changes in economic conditions and capital market conditions, including but not limited to, credit spread changes, benchmark interest rate changes, market volatility and changes in the value of underlying collateral, could cause actual results to differ materially from our estimated fair value measurements. We define fair value as the current amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The fair value of fixed-maturities, short-term investments and equity securities are estimated primarily based on information derived from third-party pricing services (“pricing services”), internal models and/or broker quotes, which use a market approach, income approach or a combination of the market and income approach depending on the type of instrument and availability of information. We measure fair value and classify invested assets in a hierarchy for disclosure purposes consisting of three “levels” based on the observability of inputs available in the marketplace used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Reserve for Losses and LAE
We establish reserves to provide for losses and LAE, which include the estimated costs of settling claims in our Mortgage Insurance segment,mortgage insurance portfolio, in accordance with the accounting standard regarding accounting and reporting by insurance enterprises. In our mortgage insurance business, the default and claim cycle begins with the receipt of a default notice from the loan servicer. Case reserves for losses are established upon receipt of notification from servicers that a borrower has missed two monthly payments, which is when we consider a loan to be in default for financial statement and internal tracking purposes. We also establish reserves for associated LAE, consisting of the estimated cost of the claims administration process, including legal and other fees and expenses associated with administering the claims process.
We maintain an extensive database of default and claim payment history, and use models based on a variety of loan characteristics to determine the likelihood that a default will reach claim status. Estimating our case reserve for losses involves significant reliance upon assumptions and estimates with regard to the likelihood, magnitude and timing of each potential loss, including an estimate of the impact of our Loss Mitigation Activities. The models, assumptions and estimates we use to establish loss reserves may prove to be inaccurate, especially during an extended economic downturn or a period of extreme market volatility and uncertainty. As such, we cannot be certain that our reserve estimate will be adequate to cover ultimate losses on incurred defaults. This uncertainty requires management to use considerable judgment in estimating the rate at which these loans will result in claims.
With respect to loans that are in default, considerable judgment is exercised as to the adequacy of reserve levels. We use an actuarial projection methodology referred to as a “roll rate” analysis that uses historical claim frequency information to determine the projected ultimate Default to Claim Rates based on the Stage of Default and Time in Default as well as the date that a loan goes into default. The Default to Claim Rate also includes our estimates with respect to expected Rescissions and Claim Denials, which have the effect of reducing our Default to Claim Rates. Although we believe thatSee Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the table detailing our Loss Mitigation Activities are justified under our policies, certain challenges have resulted in disputes and litigation, which if resolved unfavorably to us, could require us to reassume the risk on, and increase loss reserves for, those policies or pay additional claims. The assumptions embedded in our estimated Default to Claim Rate on our in-force default inventory include an adjustment to our estimated Rescissions and Claim Denials to account for the fact that we expect a certain number of policies to be reinstated and ultimately to be paid, as a result of valid challenges by such policyholders.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
After estimating the Default to Claim Rate, we estimate Claim Severity based on the average of recently observed severity rates within product type, type of insurance, and Time in Default cohorts. These average severity estimates are then applied to individual loan coverage amounts to determine reserves. Similar to the Default to Claim Rate, Claim Severity also is impacted by the length of time that loans are in default and by our Loss Mitigation Activity. For claims under our primary mortgage insurance,Primary Mortgage Insurance, the coverage percentage is applied to the claim amount, which consists of the unpaid loan principal, plus past due interest (for which our liability is contractually capped in accordance with the terms of our Master Policies) and certain expenses associated with the default, to determine our maximum liability. Therefore, Claim Severity generally increases the longer that a loan is in default. In addition, we estimate the impact that the amount that Claim Curtailments due to servicer noncompliance with our insurance policies and servicing guidelines have on the amount that we ultimately will have to pay with respect to claims. As part of our claims review process, we assess whether defaulted loans were serviced appropriately in accordance with our insurance policies and servicing guidelines. If a servicer failed to satisfy its servicing obligations, our insurance policies provide that we may curtail the claim payment for such default, and in some circumstances, cancel coverage or deny the claim.
We do not establish reserves for loans that are in default if we believe that we will not be liable for the payment of a claim with respect to that default unless a reserve for premium deficiency is required. We generally do not establish loss reserves for expected future claims on insured mortgages that are not in default. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an exception to this general principle related to premium deficiency reserve.
IBNR and Other Reserves
We also establish reserves for defaults that we estimate have been incurred but have not been reported to us on a timely basis by the servicer, as well as for previous Rescissions, Claim Denials and Claim Curtailments that we estimate will be reinstated and subsequently paid. We generally give the policyholder up to 30 days to challenge our decision to rescind coverage before we consider a policy to be rescinded and remove it from our defaulted inventory; therefore, we currently expect only a limited percentage of policies that were rescinded to be reinstated. We currently expect a significant percentage of claims that were denied to be resubmitted as a perfected claim and ultimately paid.
Sensitivity Analysis
We considered the sensitivity of first-lien loss reserve estimates at December 31, 20192020 by assessing the potential changes resulting from a parallel shift in Claim Severity and Default to Claim Rate estimates for primary loans.loans, excluding any potential benefits from reinsurance. For example, assuming all other factors remain constant, for every one percentage point change in primary Claim Severity (which we estimate to be 97.6%97.5% of defaulted risk exposure at December 31, 2019)2020), we estimated that our loss reserves would change by approximately $3.5$8.2 million at December 31, 2019.2020. Assuming all other factors remain constant, for every one percentage point change in our overall primary net Default to Claim Rate (which we estimate to be 30%24% at December
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
31, 2019,2020, including our assumptions related to Rescissions and Claim Denials)Loss Mitigation Activities), we estimated a $11.0$33.5 million change in our loss reserves at December 31, 2019.2020.
Senior management regularly reviews the modeled frequency, Rescission, Claim Denial, Claim Curtailments and Claim Severity and Loss Mitigation Activity estimates, which are based on historical trends, as described above. If recent emerging or projected trends differ significantly from the historical trends used to develop the modeled estimates, management evaluates these trends and determines how they should be considered in its reserve estimates. Estimating our case reserve for losses involves significant reliance upon assumptions and estimates with regard to the likelihood, magnitude and timing of each potential loss. The models, assumptions and estimates we use to establish loss reserves may prove to be inaccurate, especially during an extended economic downturn or a period of extreme market volatility and economic uncertainty such as we are currently experiencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These assumptions require management to use considerable judgment in estimating the rate at which these loans will result in claims. As such, given the current environment, there is significant uncertainty around our reserve estimate.
Premium Revenue Recognition—Insurance Premiums
Mortgage InsuranceRecognition
Premiums on mortgage insurance products are written on a recurring basis, either as monthly or annual premiums, or on a multi-year basis as a single premium. Monthly premiums written are earned as coverage is provided each month. For certain monthly policies where the billing is deferred for the first month’s coverage period, currently to the end of the policy, we record a net premium receivable representing the present value of such deferred premiums that we estimate will be collected at that future date. As of December 31, 2019, this net premium receivable was $17.4 million, representing the present value of $78.4 million in contractual deferred monthly premiums, after adjustments for the estimated collectability and timing of future billing. We recognize changes in this receivable based on changes in the estimated amount and timing of such collections, including as a result of changes in observed trends as well as our periodic review of our servicing guide and our operations and collections practices. AnnualKey assumptions supporting our estimate include a collection rate and average life. During 2020, we adjusted our assumptions for collectability and average life, which had an impact of increasing the net premium receivable and net premiums writtenearned by $11.3 million and was the primary driver of the $12.3 million net change in the deferred premium receivable. If the collection rate assumption increased or decreased by 500 basis points, it would result in a $2.5 million increase or decrease, respectively, in the net premium receivable and net premiums earned. If the average life assumption increased or decreased by one year, it would result in an approximate $2.5 million decrease or increase, respectively, in the net premium receivable and net premiums earned. Additionally, given the difference between the present value of the net premium receivable recorded and the contractual premiums due, changes in our servicing guide, operations or collection practices, such as reductions in the deferral period, could have up to a $47.3 million pre-tax benefit to our results of operations in periods when any changes are initially recorded as unearned premiums and amortized on a monthly, straight-line basis.implemented.
Single premiums written are initially recorded as unearned premiums and earned over time based on the anticipated claim paymentloss pattern and the estimated period of risk exposure, which includesis primarily derived from historical industry experience and other factors such as projected losses, premium type and projected contractual periods of risk based on original LTV. Our estimate for the single premium earnings pattern is updated periodically.periodically and subject to change given uncertainty as to the underlying loss development and duration of risk. During 2019, we updated the amortization ratesour estimated period of risk exposure due to the continuing increase in the significance of borrower-paid Single Premium Policies inas well as our portfolio following our rate reductions on borrower-paid Single Premium Policies in 2018. Under HPA, most borrower-paid policies
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
must be canceled automatically on the date the LTV is scheduledestimated anticipated loss pattern due to reach 78% of the original value (or, if the loan is not current on that date, on the subsequent date that the loan becomes current). As a result, given the shift in our mix of Single Premium Policies toward more borrower-paid Single Premium Policies than lender-paid, the average anticipated term of our Single Premium IIF is declining compared to historical levels. We updated our analysis to reflect not only this anticipated effect of HPA cancellations on borrower-paid policies, but also changes in observed and projected loss patterns for both borrower-paid and lender-paid policies. Our results forlosses. During 2019, includethis change in estimate resulted in a $32.9 million increase in net premiums earned and a $0.12 increaseearned. There were no changes to our single premium earnings pattern estimate in 2020. Actual future experience that is different than expected loss development or policy cancellations could result in further material increases or decreases in the recognition of net income per share, resulting from a cumulative adjustment related topremiums earned. Based on historical experience, losses are relatively low during the updated amortization rates used to recognize revenue for Single Premium Policies.
When we rescind insurance coverage on a loan, we refund all premiums received in connection with such coverage. When insurance coverage onfirst two years after a loan is canceled dueoriginated and then increase over a period of several years before declining; however, several factors can impact and change this cycle, including the economic environment, the quality of the underwriting of the loan, characteristics of the mortgage loan, the credit profile of the borrower, housing prices and unemployment rates. If the timing of losses were to claim payment, we refund all premiums received since the date of delinquency. When insurance coverage is cancelled for a reason other than Rescissionshift, it could accelerate or claim payment, all premium that is nonrefundable is immediately earned. Premium revenue is recognized net ofdecelerate our accrual for estimated premium refunds due to Rescissions or other factors, which accrual is presented in other liabilities.
With respect to our reinsurance transactions, ceded premiums written on an annual or multi-year basis are initially set up as prepaid reinsurance and are amortized in a manner consistent with the recognition of income on direct premiums.
Revenue Recognition — Services
Revenue from services is typically comprised of real estate valuationnet premiums earned and component services, loan review, underwriting and due diligence services as well as our title and closing services. Professional services are generally sold oncould have a fixed-price or percentage-of-sale basis. In fixed fee arrangements, revenue is recognized as services are performed as measured by costs incurred to date, compared to total estimated costs to complete the services project. Under percentage-of-sale contracts, we are paid a contractual percentage of the sale proceeds upon the sale of each property. Management applies judgment when estimating project status and the costs necessary to complete the services projects. A number of internal and external factors can affect these estimates, including labor rates, utilization and efficiency variances and specification and testing requirement changes. Services are generally invoiced upon milestones in the contract or upon consumption of the hourly resources and payments are typically due 30 days after invoice.
Income Taxes
We provide for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of the accounting standard regarding accounting for income taxes. As required under this standard, our deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are recognized under the balance sheet method, which recognizes the future tax effect of temporary differences between the amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements and the tax bases of these amounts. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or deferred tax liability is expected to be realized or settled. In regards to accumulated other comprehensive income, the Company’s policy for releasing disproportionate income tax effects is to release the effects as individual items are sold.
We are required to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. At each balance sheet date, we assess our need for a valuation allowance. Our assessment is based on all available evidence, both positive and negative. This requires management to exercise judgment and make assumptions regarding whether our deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods.
Our provision for income taxes for interim financial periods is based on an estimate of our annual effective tax rate for the full year. When estimating our full year effective tax rates, we adjust our forecasted pre-tax income for gains and lossesmaterial impact on our investments, changes in the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, changes in our beginningresults of year valuation allowance, and other adjustments. The impact of these items is accounted for as Discrete Items at the applicable federal tax rate.operations.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Incremental, direct costs associated with the successful acquisition of mortgage insurance policies, consisting of compensation, premium tax and other policy issuance and underwriting expenses, are initially deferred and reported as deferred policy acquisition costs. Consistent with industry accounting practice, amortization of these costs for each underwriting year book of business is recognizedand amortized in proportion to estimated gross profits over the estimated life of the policies.
Estimated gross profits are composed of earned premium, interest income, losses and LAE. Estimates of expected gross profit, including the Persistency Rate and loss development assumptions for each underwriting year used as a basis for amortization, are evaluated quarterly and the total amortization recorded to date is adjusted by a charge or credit to our consolidated statements of operations if actual experience or other evidence suggests that previous estimates should be revised.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Considerable judgmentInvestments
We perform an evaluation of fixed-maturity securities available for sale each quarter to assess whether any decline in their fair value below cost is useddeemed to be a credit impairment recognized in evaluating these estimatesearnings. Factors considered in our assessment for impairment include the extent to which the amortized cost basis is greater than fair value and the assumptionsreasons for the decline in value. As of December 31, 2020, our gross unrealized losses on available for sale securities was $14.2 million, which they are based. The usecan fluctuate materially over time based on changes in market conditions. During 2020, we recognized credit losses of different assumptions may have a significant effect on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
$1.0 million related to our fixed-maturity securities available for sale. See Note 26 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding impairments related to investments.
Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets
We review goodwill for impairment at the impactreporting unit level at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. We review other acquired intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of recent accounting pronouncementsan asset may not be recoverable. The estimated fair value of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets requires considerable judgment and is determined by an income approach using a discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flow methodology is based on projections of the amounts and timing of future revenues and cash flows, assumed discount rates and other assumptions as deemed appropriate. In estimating future cash flows, we consider factors such as historical performance, anticipated market conditions, operating expense trends and capital expenditure requirements as well as management’s future changes in strategy.
We recognized a $4.8 million impairment of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2019. As it relates to other acquired intangible assets, we recognized $1.3 million and $13.7 million in impairments for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, our remaining goodwill and other acquired intangible assets were $9.8 million and $13.2 million, respectively. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our estimated fair value measurements are intended to reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and the risks inherent in the inputs to the model. Changes in economic conditions and capital market conditions, including but not limited to, benchmark interest rate changes, credit spread changes, market volatility and changes in the value of underlying collateral, could cause actual results to differ materially from our estimated fair value measurements.
Nearly all of our financial instruments recorded at fair value relate to our investment portfolio, which totaled $6.8 billion as of December 31, 2020. The primary risks in our investment portfolio are interest-rate risk and credit-spread risk, namely the fair value sensitivity of our fixed income securities to changes in interest rates and credit spreads, respectively. We regularly analyze our exposure to interest-rate risk and credit-spread risk and have determined that the fair value of our investments is materially exposed to changes in both interest rates and credit spreads. For additional information regarding the sensitivity of our investment portfolio to these inputs, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
See also Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information pertaining to financial instruments at fair value and our valuation methodologies.
Liability for Legal Contingencies
As discussed in Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. We establish accruals only when we determine both that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable, which requires significant accounting policies.judgment. For example, in 2019, we increased our IBNR reserve estimate by $30.5 million related to our best estimate of our probable loss in connection with legal proceedings for certain of our Loss Mitigation Activities.
Except as described in Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we believe there was not at least a reasonable possibility we may have incurred a material loss, or a material loss greater than a recorded accrual, concerning loss contingencies for asserted legal and other claims. Due to the inherently subjective nature of these estimates and the uncertainty and unpredictability surrounding the outcome of legal and other proceedings, actual results may differ materially from any amounts that have been accrued. If one or more legal matters were resolved against the Company in a reporting period for amounts above management’s expectations, actual results could differ materially from any amounts that have been accrued.
Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Income Taxes
We are required to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. At each balance sheet date, we assess our need for a valuation allowance and this assessment is based on all available evidence, both positive and negative, and requires management to exercise judgment and make assumptions regarding whether such deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods. Future realization of our deferred tax assets will ultimately depend on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character (ordinary income or capital gains) within the applicable carryback and carryforward periods provided under the tax law. In making our assessment of the more likely than not standard, the weight assigned to the effect of both positive and negative evidence is commensurate with the extent to which such evidence can be objectively verified.
We have determined that certain non-insurance entities within Radian may continue to generate taxable losses on a separate company basis in the near term and may not be able to fully utilize certain state and local NOLs on their state and local tax returns. Therefore, with respect to deferred tax assets relating to these state and local NOLs and other state timing adjustments, we retained a valuation allowance of $77.7 million at December 31, 2020 and $66.4 million at December 31, 2019.
Estimated factors in this assessment include, but are not limited to, forecasts of future income and actual and planned business and operational changes. An amount up to the total valuation allowance currently recorded could be recognized if our assessment of realizability changes. Our assumptions around these items and the weight assigned to them have remained consistent in recent periods. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Risk
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the potential for loss due to adverse changes in the value of financial instruments as a result of changes in market conditions. Examples of market risk include changes in interest rates, credit spreads, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. We perform sensitivity analyses to determine the effects of market risk exposures on our investment securities by determining the potential loss in future earnings, fair values or cash flows of market-risk-sensitive instruments resulting from one or more selected hypothetical changes in the above mentioned market risks.
Interest-Rate Risk and Credit-Spread Risk
The primary market risks in our investment portfolio are interest-rate risk and credit-spread risk, namely the fair value sensitivity of our fixed income securities to changes in interest rates and credit spreads, respectively. We regularly analyze our exposure to interest-rate risk and credit-spread risk and have determined that the fair value of our investments is materially exposed to changes in both interest rates and credit spreads. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we held $317.2$291 million of investment securities for trading purposes, representing less than 6%5% of our total investment portfolio. Accordingly, in presenting this discussion, we have not distinguished between trading and non-trading instruments.
We calculate the duration of our fixed income securities, expressed in years, in order to estimate the interest-rate sensitivity of these securities. The average duration of our total fixed income portfolio was 4.7 years at December 31, 2020 and 4.0 years at December 31, 2019 and at December 31, 2018.2019. To assist us in setting duration targets for the investment portfolio, we analyze: (i) the interest-rate sensitivities of our liabilities, including prepayment risk associated with premium cash flows and credit losses; (ii) entity specific cash flows under various economic scenarios; (iii) return, volatility and correlation of specific asset classes and the interconnection with our liabilities; and (iv) our current risk appetite.
Our sensitivitystress analysis for interest rates is based on the change in fair value of our fixed income securities, assuming a hypothetical instantaneous and parallel 100-basis point increase or decrease in the U.S. Treasury yield curve, with all other factors remaining constant. The carrying value of our fixed income securities has a balance of $6.8 billion and $5.6 billion as of December 31, 2020 and $5.1 billion.2019, respectively. If interest rates experienced an increase of 100 basis points, our fixed income portfolio would decrease by $220.4$300.4 million and $198.4$220.4 million of the market value of the related fixed income portfolio for 20192020 and 2018, respectively. A decrease of 100 basis points to interest rates would increase our fixed income portfolio by $228.1 million and $212.1 million for 2019, and 2018, respectively.
Credit spread represents the additional yield on a fixed income security, above the risk-free rate, that is paid by an issuer to compensate investors for assuming the credit risk of the issuer and market liquidity of the fixed income security. We manage credit-spread risk on both an entity and group level, across issuer, maturity, sector and asset class. Our sensitivitystress analysis for credit-spread risk is based on the change in fair value of our fixed income securities, assuming a hypothetical 100-basis point increase or decrease in all credit spreads, with the exception of U.S. Treasury and agency RMBS obligations for which we have assumed no change in credit spreads, and assuming all other factors remain constant. If credit-spreadcredit spread experienced an increase of 100 basis points, our fixed income portfolio would decrease by $211.3$285.4 million and $210.3$211.3 million of the market value of the related fixed income portfolio for 20192020 and 2018, respectively. A decrease of 100 basis points to credit spread would increase our fixed income portfolio by $172.1 million and $195.7 million for 2019, and 2018, respectively.
Actual shifts in credit spreads generally vary by issuer and security, based on issuer-specific and security-specific factors such as credit quality, maturity, sector and asset class. Within a given asset class, investment grade securities generally exhibit less credit-spread volatility than securities with lower credit ratings. OurAt December 31, 2020, 97.1% of our investment securities portfolio primarily consists ofwas rated investment grade securities.grade.
Our sensitivity analyses for interest-rate risk and credit-spread risk provide an indication of our investment portfolio’s sensitivity to shifts in interest rates and credit spreads. However, the timing and magnitude of actual market changes may differ from the hypothetical assumptions used in our sensitivity calculations.
See “Item 1. Business—Investment Policy and Portfolio” for a discussion of portfolio strategy and risk exposure.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Securities Lending Agreements.Radian Group, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance from time to time enter into short-term securities lending agreements with third-party borrowers for the purpose of increasing the yield on our investment securities portfolio with minimallimited incremental risk. Market factors, including changes in interest rates, credit spreads and equity prices, may impact the timing or magnitude of cash outflows for the return of cash collateral. As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the carrying value of these securities included in the sensitivity analyses above was $39.0$53.7 million and $17.8$39.0 million, respectively.
We also have the right to request the return of the loaned securities at any time. For additional information on our securities lending agreements, see Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
| | | | | |
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
| Page |
| Annual Financial Statements: | |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements |
Annual Financial Statements: | PAGE |
| |
| |
| |
Financial Statements as of December 20192020 and 20182019 and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017:2018: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
REPORT ON MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY
Management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivityReport of the Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial information presented in this annual report. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, applying certain estimations and judgments as required.
Our board of directors exercises its responsibility for the financial statements through its Audit Committee, which consists entirely of independent non-management board members. The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our Consolidated Financial Statements, both privately and with management present, to review accounting, auditing, internal control and financial reporting matters.
The accompanying report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is based on its audit, which it is required to conduct in accordance with the standards of theIndependent Registered Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (U.S.), and which includes the consideration of our internal control over financial reporting to establish a basis for reliance thereon in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests to be applied.
Richard G. Thornberry
Chief Executive Officer
J. Franklin Hall
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Radian Group Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Radian Group Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in common stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2020, including the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(3) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Valuation of First-Lien Primary Case Reserves for Mortgage Insurance Policies
As described in Notes 2 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company establishes case reserves for losses on mortgage insurance policies for loans that are considered to be in default, as well as reserves for loss adjustment expenses, IBNR and other reserves. As of December 31, 2019,2020, first-lien primary case reserves were $339.8$799.5 million of the total $401.3$844.1 million of mortgage insurance loss reserves. Management’s estimate of the case reserves involves significant reliance upon assumptions and estimates with regard to the likelihood, magnitude and timing of each potential loss. Management uses an actuarial projection methodology referred to as a “roll rate” analysis that uses historical claim frequency information to determine the projected ultimate default to claim rates based on the stage of default and time in default as well as the date that a loan goes into default. After estimating the default to claim rate, management estimates claim severity based on the average of recently observed severity rates within product type, type of insurance, and time in default cohorts.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of first-lien primary case reserves for mortgage insurance policies is a critical audit matter are (i) there wasthe significant judgment by management when developing their estimates of the default to claim rates and claim severity, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor subjectivity and judgment in performing procedures relating to such estimates, (ii) there wasthe significant audit effort and subjectivity in evaluating the audit evidence relatingrelated to the default to claim rates management’s assessment of the relevance of historical claim frequency information and claim severity, and (iii) the audit effort included the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s valuation of first-lien primary case reserves for mortgage insurance policies, including controls over the development of the default to claim rates and claim severity. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in developing an independent estimate of the case reserves for first-lien primary mortgage insurance policies using actual historical data, comparing this independent estimate to management’s determined case reserves, and evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assumptions related to the default to claim rates and claim severity. Performing these procedures involved testing the completeness and accuracy of data provided by management.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 28, 202026, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.
Radian Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Assets | | | | |
| Investments (Notes 5 and 6) | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale—at fair value, net of allowance for credit losses of $948 as of December 31, 2020 (amortized cost of $5,393,623 and $4,549,534) | | $ | 5,723,340 | | | $ | 4,688,911 | |
| Trading securities—at fair value (amortized cost of $260,773 and $297,505) | | 290,885 | | | 317,150 | |
| Equity securities—at fair value (cost of $145,501 and $125,311) | | 151,240 | | | 130,221 | |
| Short-term investments—at fair value (includes $15,587 and $25,561 of reinvested cash collateral held under securities lending agreements) | | 618,004 | | | 518,393 | |
| Other invested assets—at fair value | | 4,973 | | | 4,072 | |
| Total investments | | 6,788,442 | | | 5,658,747 | |
| Cash | | 87,915 | | | 92,729 | |
| Restricted cash | | 6,231 | | | 3,545 | |
| Accrued investment income | | 34,047 | | | 32,333 | |
| Accounts and notes receivable | | 121,294 | | | 93,630 | |
| | | | |
| Reinsurance recoverables | | 73,202 | | | 16,976 | |
| Deferred policy acquisition costs | | 18,305 | | | 20,759 | |
| Property and equipment, net (Note 2) | | 80,457 | | | 87,879 | |
| Prepaid reinsurance premium | | 267,638 | | | 363,856 | |
| Goodwill and other acquired intangible assets, net (Note 7) | | 23,043 | | | 28,187 | |
| Other assets (Note 9) | | 447,447 | | | 409,672 | |
| Total assets | | $ | 7,948,021 | | | $ | 6,808,313 | |
| | | | |
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | |
| Liabilities | | | | |
| Unearned premiums | | $ | 448,791 | | | $ | 626,822 | |
| Reserve for losses and LAE (Note 11) | | 848,413 | | | 404,765 | |
| Senior notes (Note 12) | | 1,405,674 | | | 887,110 | |
| FHLB advances (Note 12) | | 176,483 | | | 134,875 | |
| Reinsurance funds withheld | | 278,555 | | | 291,829 | |
| Net deferred tax liability (Note 10) | | 213,897 | | | 71,084 | |
| Other liabilities | | 291,855 | | | 343,105 | |
| Total liabilities | | 3,663,668 | | | 2,759,590 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) | | 0 | | 0 |
| Stockholders’ equity | | | | |
| Common stock: par value $0.001 per share; 485,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2020 and 2019; 210,130 and 219,123 shares issued at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively; 191,606 and 201,164 shares outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | | 210 | | | 219 | |
| Treasury stock, at cost: 18,524 and 17,959 shares at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | | (910,115) | | | (901,657) | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | 2,245,897 | | | 2,449,884 | |
| Retained earnings | | 2,684,636 | | | 2,389,789 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 15) | | 263,725 | | | 110,488 | |
| Total stockholders’ equity | | 4,284,353 | | | 4,048,723 | |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 7,948,021 | | | $ | 6,808,313 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Radian Group Inc. |
| CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
| | December 31,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | | | |
| Assets | | | |
| Investments (Notes 5 and 6) | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale—at fair value (amortized cost of $4,549,534 and $4,098,962) | $ | 4,688,911 |
| | $ | 4,021,575 |
|
| Trading securities—at fair value (amortized cost of $297,505 and $468,696) | 317,150 |
| | 469,071 |
|
| Equity securities—at fair value (cost of $125,311 and $139,377) | 130,221 |
| | 130,565 |
|
| Short-term investments—at fair value (includes $25,561 and $11,699 of reinvested cash collateral held under securities lending agreements) | 518,393 |
| | 528,403 |
|
| Other invested assets—at fair value | 4,072 |
| | 3,415 |
|
| Total investments | 5,658,747 |
| | 5,153,029 |
|
| Cash | 92,729 |
| | 95,393 |
|
| Restricted cash | 3,545 |
| | 11,609 |
|
| Accounts and notes receivable | 93,630 |
| | 78,652 |
|
| Deferred income taxes, net (Note 10) | — |
| | 131,643 |
|
| Goodwill and other acquired intangible assets, net (Note 7) | 28,187 |
| | 58,998 |
|
| Prepaid reinsurance premium | 363,856 |
| | 417,628 |
|
| Other assets (Note 9) | 567,619 |
| | 367,700 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 6,808,313 |
| | $ | 6,314,652 |
|
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
| | |
| Unearned premiums | $ | 626,822 |
| | $ | 739,357 |
|
| Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) (Note 11) | 404,765 |
| | 401,361 |
|
| Senior notes (Note 12) | 887,110 |
| | 1,030,348 |
|
| FHLB advances (Note 12) | 134,875 |
| | 82,532 |
|
| Reinsurance funds withheld | 291,829 |
| | 321,212 |
|
| Other liabilities | 414,189 |
| | 251,127 |
|
| Total liabilities | 2,759,590 |
| | 2,825,937 |
|
| Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) |
| |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | | | |
| Common stock: par value $.001 per share; 485,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2019 and 2018; 219,123 and 231,132 shares issued at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively; 201,164 and 213,473 shares outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | 219 |
| | 231 |
|
| Treasury stock, at cost: 17,959 and 17,660 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | (901,657 | ) | | (894,870 | ) |
| Additional paid-in capital | 2,449,884 |
| | 2,724,733 |
|
| Retained earnings | 2,389,789 |
| | 1,719,541 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 17) | 110,488 |
| | (60,920 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 4,048,723 |
| | 3,488,715 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 6,808,313 |
| | $ | 6,314,652 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Radian Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | |
| Net premiums earned (Note 8) | | $ | 1,115,321 | | | $ | 1,145,349 | | | $ | 1,014,007 | | | |
| Services revenue (Note 4) | | 105,385 | | | 154,596 | | | 144,972 | | | |
| Net investment income (Note 6) | | 154,037 | | | 171,796 | | | 152,475 | | | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 60,277 | | | 51,719 | | | (42,476) | | | |
| Other income | | 3,597 | | | 3,495 | | | 4,028 | | | |
| Total revenues | | 1,438,617 | | | 1,526,955 | | | 1,273,006 | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | |
| Provision for losses | | 485,117 | | | 132,031 | | | 104,641 | | | |
| Policy acquisition costs | | 30,989 | | | 25,314 | | | 25,265 | | | |
| Cost of services | | 86,066 | | | 108,324 | | | 98,124 | | | |
| Other operating expenses | | 280,710 | | | 306,129 | | | 280,818 | | | |
| Restructuring and other exit costs | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6,053 | | | |
| Interest expense | | 71,150 | | | 56,310 | | | 61,490 | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 12) | | 0 | | | 22,738 | | | 0 | | | |
| Impairment of goodwill (Note 7) | | 0 | | | 4,828 | | | 0 | | | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | 5,144 | | | 22,288 | | | 12,429 | | | |
| Total expenses | | 959,176 | | | 677,962 | | | 588,820 | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Pretax income | | 479,441 | | | 848,993 | | | 684,186 | | | |
| Income tax provision (Note 10) | | 85,815 | | | 176,684 | | | 78,175 | | | |
| Net income | | $ | 393,626 | | | $ | 672,309 | | | $ | 606,011 | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income per share: | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 2.01 | | | $ | 3.22 | | | $ | 2.83 | | | |
| Diluted | | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 3.20 | | | $ | 2.77 | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding—basic | | 195,443 | | | 208,773 | | | 214,267 | | | |
| Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding—diluted | | 196,642 | | | 210,340 | | | 218,553 | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Radian Group Inc. |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Revenues: | | | | | |
| Net premiums earned—insurance (Note 8) | $ | 1,145,349 |
| | $ | 1,014,007 |
| | $ | 932,773 |
|
| Services revenue (Note 4) | 154,596 |
| | 144,972 |
| | 155,103 |
|
| Net investment income (Note 6) | 171,796 |
| | 152,475 |
| | 127,248 |
|
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 51,719 |
| | (42,476 | ) | | 3,621 |
|
| Other income | 3,495 |
| | 4,028 |
| | 2,886 |
|
| Total revenues | 1,526,955 |
| | 1,273,006 |
| | 1,221,631 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | |
| Provision for losses | 132,031 |
| | 104,641 |
| | 135,154 |
|
| Policy acquisition costs | 25,314 |
| | 25,265 |
| | 24,277 |
|
| Cost of services | 108,324 |
| | 98,124 |
| | 104,599 |
|
| Other operating expenses | 306,129 |
| | 280,818 |
| | 267,321 |
|
| Restructuring and other exit costs | — |
| | 6,053 |
| | 17,268 |
|
| Interest expense | 56,310 |
|
| 61,490 |
|
| 62,761 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 12) | 22,738 |
| | — |
| | 51,469 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill (Note 7) | 4,828 |
| | — |
| | 184,374 |
|
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | 22,288 |
| | 12,429 |
| | 27,671 |
|
| Total expenses | 677,962 |
| | 588,820 |
| | 874,894 |
|
| Pretax income | 848,993 |
| | 684,186 |
| | 346,737 |
|
| Income tax provision (Note 10) | 176,684 |
|
| 78,175 |
|
| 225,649 |
|
| Net income | $ | 672,309 |
| | $ | 606,011 |
| | $ | 121,088 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net income per share: | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 3.22 |
| | $ | 2.83 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 3.20 |
| | $ | 2.77 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding—basic | 208,773 |
| | 214,267 |
| | 215,321 |
|
| Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding—diluted | 210,340 |
| | 218,553 |
| | 220,406 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Radian Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | | | |
| Net income | | $ | 393,626 | | | $ | 672,309 | | | $ | 606,011 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (Note 15): | | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period for which an allowance for expected losses has not been recognized | | 178,761 | | | 180,441 | | | (97,356) | |
| Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (loss): | | | | | | |
| Net realized gains (losses) on disposals and non-credit related impairment losses | | 26,440 | | | 8,897 | | | (10,270) | |
| Net decrease (increase) in expected credit losses | | (991) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | | 153,312 | | | 171,544 | | | (87,086) | |
| Other adjustments to comprehensive income, net | | (75) | | | (136) | | | 133 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | 153,237 | | | 171,408 | | | (86,953) | |
| Comprehensive income | | $ | 546,863 | | | $ | 843,717 | | | $ | 519,058 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Radian Group Inc. |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net income | $ | 672,309 |
| | $ | 606,011 |
| | $ | 121,088 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (Note 17): | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | 180,441 |
| | (97,356 | ) | | 31,903 |
|
| Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income | 8,897 |
| | (10,270 | ) | | (2,642 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | 171,544 |
| | (87,086 | ) | | 34,545 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | 5 |
| | 150 |
|
| Less: Reclassification adjustment for liquidation of foreign subsidiary and other adjustments included in net income | 3 |
| | 1 |
| | (721 | ) |
| Net foreign currency translation adjustments | (3 | ) | | 4 |
| | 871 |
|
| Net actuarial gains (losses) | (133 | ) | | 129 |
| | 64 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 171,408 |
| | (86,953 | ) | | 35,480 |
|
| Comprehensive income | $ | 843,717 |
| | $ | 519,058 |
| | $ | 156,568 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Radian Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Stockholders’ Equity
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Common Stock | | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 219 | | | $ | 231 | | | $ | 233 | |
| | | | | | |
| Issuance of common stock under incentive and benefit plans | | 2 | | | 1 | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Shares repurchased under share repurchase program (Note 14) | | (11) | | | (13) | | | (3) | |
| Balance, end of period | | 210 | | | 219 | | | 231 | |
| | | | | | |
| Treasury Stock | | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | | (901,657) | | | (894,870) | | | (893,888) | |
| Repurchases of common stock under incentive plans | | (8,458) | | | (6,787) | | | (982) | |
| Balance, end of period | | (910,115) | | | (901,657) | | | (894,870) | |
| | | | | | |
| Additional Paid-in Capital | | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | | 2,449,884 | | | 2,724,733 | | | 2,754,275 | |
| Issuance of common stock under incentive and benefit plans | | 3,143 | | | 3,925 | | | 2,859 | |
| | | | | | |
| Share-based compensation | | 19,164 | | | 21,414 | | | 17,649 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Shares repurchased under share repurchase program (Note 14) | | (226,294) | | | (300,188) | | | (50,050) | |
| Balance, end of period | | 2,245,897 | | | 2,449,884 | | | 2,724,733 | |
| | | | | | |
| Retained Earnings | | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | | 2,389,789 | | | 1,719,541 | | | 1,116,333 | |
| Cumulative effect of adopting accounting standards updates | | — | | | — | | | (663) | |
| Net income | | 393,626 | | | 672,309 | | | 606,011 | |
| Dividends and dividend equivalents declared | | (98,779) | | | (2,061) | | | (2,140) | |
| Balance, end of period | | 2,684,636 | | | 2,389,789 | | | 1,719,541 | |
| | | | | | |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | | 110,488 | | | (60,920) | | | 23,085 | |
| Cumulative effect of adopting accounting standards updates | | — | | | — | | | 2,948 | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax | | 153,312 | | | 171,544 | | | (87,086) | |
| Other adjustments to other comprehensive income (loss) | | (75) | | | (136) | | | 133 | |
| Balance, end of period | | 263,725 | | | 110,488 | | | (60,920) | |
| Total Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 4,284,353 | | | $ | 4,048,723 | | | $ | 3,488,715 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Radian Group Inc. |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Common Stock | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 231 |
| | $ | 233 |
| | $ | 232 |
|
| Issuance of common stock under incentive and benefit plans | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
|
| Shares repurchased under share repurchase program (Note 14) | (13 | ) | | (3 | ) | | — |
|
| Balance, end of period | 219 |
| | 231 |
| | 233 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Treasury Stock | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | (894,870 | ) | | (893,888 | ) | | (893,332 | ) |
| Repurchases of common stock under incentive plans | (6,787 | ) | | (982 | ) | | (556 | ) |
| Balance, end of period | (901,657 | ) | | (894,870 | ) | | (893,888 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Additional Paid-in Capital | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | 2,724,733 |
| | 2,754,275 |
| | 2,779,891 |
|
| Issuance of common stock under incentive and benefit plans | 3,925 |
| | 2,859 |
| | 8,635 |
|
| Cumulative effect of adopting accounting standard updates | — |
| | — |
| | 756 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | 21,414 |
| | 17,649 |
| | 13,491 |
|
| Impact of extinguishment of convertible senior notes (Note 12) | — |
| | — |
| | (52,700 | ) |
| Termination of capped calls (Note 12) | — |
| | — |
| | 4,208 |
|
| Shares repurchased under share repurchase program (Note 14) | (300,188 | ) | | (50,050 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Balance, end of period | 2,449,884 |
| | 2,724,733 |
| | 2,754,275 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Retained Earnings | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | 1,719,541 |
| | 1,116,333 |
| | 997,890 |
|
| Cumulative effect of adopting accounting standards updates | — |
| | (663 | ) | | (491 | ) |
| Net income | 672,309 |
| | 606,011 |
| | 121,088 |
|
| Dividends declared | (2,061 | ) | | (2,140 | ) | | (2,154 | ) |
| Balance, end of period | 2,389,789 |
| | 1,719,541 |
| | 1,116,333 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | (60,920 | ) | | 23,085 |
| | (12,395 | ) |
| Cumulative effect of adopting accounting standards updates | — |
| | 2,948 |
| | — |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax | 171,544 |
| | (87,086 | ) | | 34,545 |
|
| Net foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax | (3 | ) | | 4 |
| | 871 |
|
| Net actuarial gains (losses) | (133 | ) | | 129 |
| | 64 |
|
| Balance, end of period | 110,488 |
| | (60,920 | ) | | 23,085 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Total Stockholders’ Equity | $ | 4,048,723 |
| | $ | 3,488,715 |
| | $ | 3,000,038 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Radian Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Net income | | $ | 393,626 | | | $ | 672,309 | | | $ | 606,011 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Net (gains) losses on investments and other financial instruments | | (60,277) | | | (51,719) | | | 42,476 | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | 0 | | | 22,738 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Deferred income tax provision | | 102,079 | | | 157,162 | | | 120,573 | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | 0 | | | 4,828 | | | 0 | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | 5,144 | | | 22,288 | | | 12,429 | |
| Depreciation, other amortization, and other impairments, net | | 66,585 | | | 50,439 | | | 56,661 | |
| Change in: | | | | | | |
| Accrued investment income | | (1,714) | | | 2,545 | | | (3,485) | |
| Accounts and notes receivable | | (29,280) | | | (25,504) | | | (4,599) | |
| Reinsurance recoverables | | (56,226) | | | (2,574) | | | (2,497) | |
| Deferred policy acquisition costs | | 2,454 | | | (3,448) | | | (324) | |
| Prepaid reinsurance premiums | | 96,218 | | | 53,772 | | | (31,119) | |
| Unearned premiums | | (178,031) | | | (112,535) | | | 15,419 | |
| Reserve for losses and LAE | | 443,648 | | | 3,404 | | | (109,642) | |
| Reinsurance funds withheld | | (13,274) | | | (29,383) | | | 32,814 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Other assets | | (57,538) | | | (130,953) | | | 49,868 | |
| Other liabilities | | (54,980) | | | 61,062 | | | (106,799) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | 658,434 | | | 694,431 | | | 677,786 | |
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from sales of: | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | | 963,589 | | | 986,647 | | | 728,584 | |
| Trading securities | | 11,602 | | | 130,537 | | | 58,317 | |
| Equity securities | | 90,450 | | | 69,779 | | | 95,697 | |
| Proceeds from redemptions of: | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | | 645,068 | | | 464,777 | | | 457,595 | |
| Trading securities | | 22,913 | | | 37,684 | | | 54,329 | |
| Purchases of: | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | | (2,449,762) | | | (1,913,703) | | | (1,875,069) | |
| Equity securities | | (85,014) | | | (57,422) | | | (69,160) | |
| | | | | | |
| Sales, redemptions and (purchases) of: | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments, net | | (82,925) | | | 8,017 | | | (108,325) | |
| Other assets and other invested assets, net | | 1,434 | | | (739) | | | 2,590 | |
| Proceeds from sale of subsidiary, net of cash sold | | 16,481 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | | (17,016) | | | (27,626) | | | (26,008) | |
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (7,964) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | (883,180) | | | (302,049) | | | (689,414) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Radian Group Inc. |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| (In thousands) | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 672,309 |
| | $ | 606,011 |
| | $ | 121,088 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | |
| Net (gains) losses on investments and other financial instruments | (51,719 | ) | | 42,476 |
| | (3,621 | ) |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 22,738 |
| | — |
| | 51,469 |
|
| Deferred income tax provision | 157,162 |
| | 120,573 |
| | 166,527 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill | 4,828 |
| | — |
| | 184,374 |
|
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | 22,288 |
| | 12,429 |
| | 27,797 |
|
| Depreciation, other amortization, and other impairments, net | 50,439 |
| | 56,661 |
| | 58,038 |
|
| Change in: |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Accounts and notes receivable | (25,504 | ) | | (4,599 | ) | | 3,628 |
|
| Prepaid reinsurance premiums | 53,772 |
| | (31,119 | ) | | (157,071 | ) |
| Unearned premiums | (112,535 | ) | | 15,419 |
| | 42,716 |
|
| Reserve for losses and LAE | 3,404 |
| | (109,642 | ) | | (252,681 | ) |
| Reinsurance funds withheld | (29,383 | ) | | 32,814 |
| | 130,397 |
|
| Other assets | (134,430 | ) | | 43,562 |
| | (16,491 | ) |
| Other liabilities | 61,062 |
| | (106,799 | ) | | 4,405 |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 694,431 |
| | 677,786 |
| | 360,575 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
| Proceeds from sales of: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | 986,647 |
| | 728,584 |
| | 888,219 |
|
| Trading securities | 130,537 |
| | 58,317 |
| | 194,784 |
|
| Equity securities | 69,779 |
| | 95,697 |
| | 38,318 |
|
| Proceeds from redemptions of: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | 464,777 |
| | 457,595 |
| | 463,548 |
|
| Trading securities | 37,684 |
| | 54,329 |
| | 79,296 |
|
| Purchases of: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | (1,913,703 | ) | | (1,875,069 | ) | | (1,947,916 | ) |
| Equity securities | (57,422 | ) | | (69,160 | ) | | (213,469 | ) |
| Sales, redemptions and (purchases) of: | | | | | |
| Short-term investments, net | 8,017 |
| | (108,325 | ) | | 324,258 |
|
| Other assets and other invested assets, net | (739 | ) | | 2,590 |
| | 882 |
|
| Net cash received (transferred) in sale of subsidiaries | — |
| | — |
| | (650 | ) |
| Purchases of property and equipment, net | (27,626 | ) | | (26,008 | ) | | (28,676 | ) |
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |
| | (7,964 | ) | | (86 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (302,049 | ) | | (689,414 | ) | | (201,492 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Radian Group Inc. |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| (In thousands) | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
| Dividends paid | (2,061 | ) | | (2,140 | ) | | (2,154 | ) |
| Issuance of senior notes, net | 442,439 |
| | — |
| | 442,163 |
|
| Repayments and repurchases of senior notes | (610,763 | ) | | — |
| | (593,527 | ) |
| Proceeds from termination of capped calls | — |
| | — |
| | 4,208 |
|
| Issuance of common stock | 2,416 |
| | 1,385 |
| | 7,132 |
|
| Repurchases of common shares | (300,201 | ) | | (50,053 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Credit facility commitment fees paid | (989 | ) | | (1,510 | ) | | (1,993 | ) |
| Change in secured borrowings, net (with terms 3 months or less) | 13,862 |
| | 39,342 |
| | 19,357 |
|
| Proceeds from secured borrowings (with terms greater than 3 months) | 115,275 |
| | 56,449 |
| | — |
|
| Repayments of secured borrowings (with terms greater than 3 months) | (62,932 | ) | | (20,917 | ) | | — |
|
| Repayments of other borrowings | (152 | ) | | (170 | ) | | (264 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (403,106 | ) | | 22,386 |
| | (125,084 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | (4 | ) | | — |
| | 431 |
|
| Increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash | (10,728 | ) | | 10,758 |
| | 34,430 |
|
| Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period | 107,002 |
| | 96,244 |
| | 61,814 |
|
| Cash and restricted cash, end of period | $ | 96,274 |
| | $ | 107,002 |
| | $ | 96,244 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | |
| Income taxes paid (received) (Note 10) | $ | 71,469 |
| | $ | 8,364 |
| | $ | 94,328 |
|
| Interest paid | 45,762 |
| | 56,688 |
| | 57,453 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | |
| Dividends and dividend equivalents paid | | (97,458) | | | (2,061) | | | (2,140) | |
| Issuance of senior notes, net | | 515,567 | | | 442,439 | | | 0 | |
| Repayments and repurchases of senior notes | | 0 | | | (610,763) | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | |
| Issuance of common stock | | 1,553 | | | 2,416 | | | 1,385 | |
| Repurchases of common shares | | (226,305) | | | (300,201) | | | (50,053) | |
| Credit facility commitment fees paid | | (2,292) | | | (989) | | | (1,510) | |
| Change in secured borrowings, net (with terms three months or less) | | (37,475) | | | 13,862 | | | 39,342 | |
| Proceeds from secured borrowings (with terms greater than three months) | | 207,034 | | | 115,275 | | | 56,449 | |
| Repayments of secured borrowings (with terms greater than three months) | | (137,927) | | | (62,932) | | | (20,917) | |
| | | | | | |
| Repayments of other borrowings | | (79) | | | (152) | | | (170) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 222,618 | | | (403,106) | | | 22,386 | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | | 0 | | | (4) | | | 0 | |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash | | (2,128) | | | (10,728) | | | 10,758 | |
| Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period | | 96,274 | | | 107,002 | | | 96,244 | |
| Cash and restricted cash, end of period | | $ | 94,146 | | | $ | 96,274 | | | $ | 107,002 | |
| | | | | | |
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | |
| Income taxes paid (Note 10) | | $ | 81,404 | | | $ | 71,469 | | | $ | 8,364 | |
| Interest paid | | 60,564 | | | 45,762 | | | 56,688 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
112
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Description of Business
We are a diversified mortgage and real estate services business, providing both credit-related mortgage insurance coverage and other credit risk management solutions, as well as a broad array of other mortgage, risk, title, valuation, asset management and other real estate title and mortgage services. We have 2 reportable business segments—Mortgage Insurance and Services.Real Estate.
Mortgage Insurance
Our Mortgage Insurance segment provides credit-related insurance coverage, principally through private mortgage insurance on residential first-lien mortgage loans, as well as other credit risk management and contract underwriting solutions, to mortgage lending institutions and mortgage credit investors. We provide our mortgage insurance products and services mainly through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Radian Guaranty. Private mortgage insurance plays an important role in the U.S. housing finance system because it promotes affordable home ownership and helps protect mortgage lenders and investors, andas well as other beneficiaries by mitigating default-related losses on residential mortgage loans. Generally, these loans are made to home buyershomebuyers who make down payments of less than 20% of the purchase price for their home or, in the case of refinancings, have less than 20% equity in their home. Private mortgage insurance also facilitates the sale of these low down payment loans in the secondary mortgage market, most of which are currently sold to the GSEs. Our total direct primary mortgage IIF and RIF were $246.1 billion and $60.7 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2020, compared to $240.6 billion and $60.9 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. In addition to providing private mortgage insurance, we participate in credit risk transfer programs developed by the GSEs as part of their initiative to distribute mortgage credit risk and increase the role of private capital in the mortgage market. Our additional RIF under credit risk transfer transactions, resulting from our participation in these programs with the GSEs, totaled $392.0 million as of December 31, 2020 compared to $275.2 million as of December 31, 2019.
The GSEs and state insurance regulators impose various capital and financial requirements on our mortgage insurance subsidiaries. These include Risk-to-capital, other risk-based capital measures and surplus requirements, as well as the PMIERs financial requirements. Failure to comply with these capital and financial requirements may limit the amount of insurance that our mortgage insurance subsidiaries may write or may prohibit our mortgage insurance subsidiariesthem from writing insurance altogether. The GSEs and state insurance regulators also possess significant discretion with respect to our mortgage insurance subsidiaries and all aspects of their business. See Note 1816 for additional information on PMIERs and other regulatory information.information, and “—Recent Developments” below for a discussion of the elevated risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to an increase in mortgage defaults in our insured portfolio and a resulting increase in our Minimum Required Assets during 2020.
ServicesReal Estate
Our ServicesReal Estate segment is primarily a fee-for-service business that offers a broad array of real estate, titleproducts and mortgage services to market participants across the real estate value chain. Our real estate services include title, valuation, asset management and other real estate services offered primarily to mortgage lenders, mortgage and real estate value chain. We offer these services primarily to mortgage lenders, financial institutions, investors, and government entities. In addition, we provide title insurance and settlement services to mortgage lenders as well as directly to consumers. OurGSEs, real estate brokers and agents. These services help lenders, investors, consumers and real estate agents evaluate, manage, monitor, acquire and sell properties. These real estate services include software as a service solutions and platforms, as well as managed services, such as REO asset management, real estate valuationsingle family rental services and real estate brokeragevaluation services. OurIn addition, we provide title services provide a comprehensive suite of insurance and non-insurance title, closing and settlement services to mortgage lenders, GSEs and mortgage investors, as well as directly to consumers for residential mortgage loans. Our mortgage services include a full range of services to support
See Note 4 for additional information about our reportable segments and All Other business activities, including the single family rental business and asset class and contract underwriting to support our mortgage insurance customers.
Prior to our January 2020 sale of Clayton and the impact of organizational changes in the first quarter of 2020, as well as other changes impacting our reportable segments in 2020.
Recent Developments
As a seller of mortgage servicescredit protection, our results are subject to macroeconomic conditions and specific events that impact the housing finance and real estate markets, including events that impact mortgage originations and the credit performance of our RIF. Many of these conditions are beyond our control, including housing prices, unemployment, interest rate changes, the availability of credit and other factors that may be derived from national and regional economic conditions. In general, a deterioration in economic conditions increases the likelihood that borrowers will be unable to satisfy their mortgage obligations. A deteriorating economy can adversely affect housing values, which in turn can influence the willingness of borrowers to continue to make mortgage payments regardless of whether they have the financial resources to do so. Mortgage defaults can also included transaction management services,occur due to a variety of specific events affecting borrowers, including death or illness, divorce or other family problems, unemployment, or other events. In addition, factors impacting regional economic conditions, acts of terrorism, war or other severe conflicts, event-specific economic depressions or other catastrophic events such as loan review, RMBS securitizationnatural disasters and distressed asset reviews
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
pandemics could result in increased defaults due to the impact of such events on the ability of borrowers to satisfy their mortgage obligations and serviceron the value of affected homes.
Beginning in March 2020, the unprecedented and loan surveillance services.continually evolving social and economic impacts associated with the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. and global economies generally, and in particular on the U.S. housing, real estate and housing finance markets, had a negative effect on our business and our financial results for the second quarter of 2020, and to a lesser extent the second half of 2020, and are expected to adversely impact our business and results of operations in future periods. Specifically, and primarily as a result of an increase in the number of new defaults for the year ended December 31, 2020, our financial results include: (i) an increase in provision for losses and (ii) an increase in our Minimum Required Assets required under the PMIERs. The number of new defaults increased significantly during the second quarter of 2020, but have trended down during the second half of the year, while remaining elevated compared to levels before the pandemic. See Note 711 for additional information on our reserve for losses.
In response to the saleuncertainties associated with COVID-19, during the second quarter of Clayton.2020 we strengthened our capital and liquidity positions by extending our existing credit facility and issuing $525 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2025. See Note 12 for additional information on our borrowings and financing activities. The long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our businesses will depend on, among other things: the extent and duration of the pandemic, the severity of and number of people infected with the virus and the widespread availability of effective anti-viral treatments and vaccines, especially as new strains of COVID-19 have been discovered; the wider economic effects of the pandemic and the scope and duration of governmental and other third-party measures restricting day-to-day life and business operations; the impact of economic stimulus efforts to support the economy through the pandemic; and governmental and GSE programs implemented to assist borrowers experiencing a COVID-19-related hardship, including forbearance programs and suspensions of foreclosures and evictions. Although we are uncertain of the potential magnitude or duration of the business and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, these and other factors could continue to have a material negative effect on the Company’s business, liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and include the accounts of Radian Group Inc. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions, and intercompany profits and losses, have been eliminated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.presentation, including certain balance sheet line items that were previously reported in other assets or other liabilities and certain segment reporting balances due to changes in the composition of our segments during 2020.
We refer to Radian Group Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries as “Radian,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our,” unless the context requires otherwise. We generally refer to Radian Group Inc. alone, without its consolidated subsidiaries, as “Radian Group.” Unless otherwise defined in this report, certain terms and acronyms used throughout this report are defined in the Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms included as part of this report.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of our contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. While the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements include our best estimates and assumptions, actual results may vary materially.
Investments
We group fixed-maturity securities in our investment portfolio into one of three3 main categories: held to maturity, available for sale or trading securities. Fixed-maturity securities for which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, if any, are classified as held to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Trading securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of income. Investments in fixed-maturity securities not classified as held to maturity or trading securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses (net of tax) reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Equity securities consist of holdings in common stock, preferred stock and exchange traded funds, which effective January 1, 2018, are all recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in income. Prior to the implementation of the update to the standard for the accounting of financial instruments effective January 1, 2018, the unrealized gains (losses) associated with equity securities that were available for sale were classified in accumulated other comprehensive income. Short-term investments consist of money market instruments, certificates of deposit and highly liquid, interest-bearing instruments with an original maturity of 12 months or less at the time of purchase. Amortization of premium and accretion of discount are calculated principally using the interest method over the term of the investment. Realized gains and losses on investments are recognized using the specific identification method. See Notes 5 and 6 for further discussion on investments.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
We recordrecognize an other-than-temporary impairment adjustmentas a loss for fixed-maturities available for sale on a security with an unrealized loss ifthe statement of operations if: (i) we intend to sell the impaired security, ifsecurity; (ii) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the impaired security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis,basis; or if(iii) the present value of cash flows we expect to collect is less than the amortized cost basis of thea security. In those instances, we record an impairment loss through earnings that varies depending on specific circumstances. If a sale is likely, the security is classified as other-than-temporarily impaired and the full amount of the impairment is recognized as a loss in the statement of operations. Otherwise, unrealized losses on securities that are other-than-temporarily impaired are separated into: (i) the portion of loss that represents the credit loss and (ii) the portion that is due to other factors. The credit loss portion is recognized as a loss in the statement of operations, while the loss due to other factors is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes. A credit loss is determined to exist if the present value of discounted cash flows expected to be collected from the security is less than the amortized cost basis of the security. The present value of discounted cash flows is determined using the original yield of the security. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary,for other securities relates to an existing credit loss, we consider several factors, in addition to the above, including, but not limited to, the following:
■the extent andto which the duration of the decline inamortized cost basis is greater than fair value;
the ■reasons for the decline in value (e.g., credit event, interest-relatedadverse conditions related to industry or market fluctuations)geographic area, changes in financial condition to the issuers or underlying loan obligors); and
■any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency;
■the failure of the issuer to make a scheduled payment;
■the financial position, access to capital and near termnear-term prospects of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events.events; and
■our best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”), as described below under “—Recent Accounting Pronouncements” and effective January 1, 2020, we also considered the duration of the decline in value in assessing whether our fixed income securities available for sale have a credit loss impairment.
As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-13, on initial recognition and at each reporting date after a credit loss is identified, we recognize an allowance for remaining lifetime expected credit losses. This amount is calculated as the difference between the amortized cost and the present value of future expected cash flows, limited to the difference between the carrying amount (i.e. fair value) and amortized cost. If a credit loss is determined to exist, the credit loss impairment is included in net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments in the statement of operations, with an offset to an allowance for credit losses. Subsequent changes (favorable and unfavorable) in expected credit losses are recognized immediately in net income as a credit loss impairment or a reversal of credit loss impairment.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, the amortized cost of any other-than-temporarily impaired securities was written down to a new basis and any subsequent increases in fair value were recognized as a component of other comprehensive income until such gains were realized through cash collection or sale, rather than through net income.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our estimated fair value measurements are intended to reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and the risks inherent in the inputs to the model. Changes in economic conditions and capital market conditions, including but not limited to, credit spread changes, benchmark interest rate changes, market volatility and changes in the value of underlying collateral, could cause actual results to differ materially from our estimated fair value measurements. We define fair value as the current amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
In accordance with GAAP, we established a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level I measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level III measurements). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined below:
| |
Level I | Level I — Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; Level II — Prices or valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and Level III— Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
| |
Level II | — Prices or valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and
|
| |
Level III | — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. Level III inputs are used to measure fair value only to the extent that observable inputs are not available.
|
For markets in which inputs are not observable or are limited, we use significant judgment and assumptions that a typical market participant would use to evaluate the market price of an asset or liability. Given the level of judgment necessary, another
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
market participant may derive a materially different estimate of fair value. These assets and liabilities are classified in Level III of our fair value hierarchy.
Available for sale securities, trading securities, equity securities and certain other assets are recorded at fair value as described in Note 5. All changes in fair value of trading securities, equity securities (effective January 1, 2018) and certain other assets are included in our consolidated statements of operations.
Restricted Cash
Included in our restricted cash balances as of December 31, 20192020 were cash funds held in trusts for the benefit of: a mortgage insurance reserve policy held in escrow for any future duties, rights and liabilities; certain policyholders; servicer liabilities; and title services obligations.
Accounts and Notes Receivable
Accounts and notes receivable primarily consist of accrued premiums receivable, due from our Mortgage Insurance customers, amounts billed and due from our Services customers for services our Services segment has performed, and profit commission receivable, if any,certain receivables related to our reinsurance transactions. See “—Revenue Recognition—Mortgage Insurance” below for information on our deferred premium receivable, and Note 8 for details.details on our reinsurance agreements. Accounts and notes receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts, net of any allowance for doubtful accounts, and are periodically evaluated for collectability based on past payment history and current economic conditions. Accounts and notes receivable exclude unbilled receivables totaling $13.8 million, which represent receivables for services performed that are not yet billed. Unbilled receivables are presented in other assets.
Income Taxes
We provide for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of the accounting standard regarding accounting for income taxes. As required under this standard, our deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are recognized under the balance sheet method, which recognizes the future tax effect of temporary differences between the amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements and the tax bases of these amounts. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or deferred tax liability is expected to be realized or settled. In regards to accumulated other comprehensive income, the Company’s policy for releasing disproportionate income tax effects is to release the effects as individual items are sold.
We are required to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. At each balance sheet date, we assess our need for a valuation allowance. Our assessment is based on all available evidence, both positive and negative. This requires management to exercise judgment and make assumptions regarding whether our deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods.
Our provision for income taxes for interim financial periods is based on an estimate of our annual effective tax rate for the full year. When estimating our full year effective tax rates,rate, we adjust our forecasted pre-tax incomeestimate for gains and losses on our investments, changes in the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, changes in our beginning of year valuation allowance, and other adjustments. The impact of these items is accounted for as Discrete Items at the applicable federal tax rate.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Reserve for Losses and LAE
Mortgage Insurance
We establish reserves to provide for losses and LAE on our mortgage insurance policies, which include the estimated costs of settling claims, in our Mortgage Insurance segment, in accordance with the accounting standard regarding accounting and reporting by insurance enterprises (ASC 944). Although this standard specifically excludes mortgage insurance from its guidance relating to the reserve for losses, because there is no specific guidance for mortgage insurance, we establish reserves for mortgage insurance as described below, using the guidance contained in this standard supplemented with other accounting guidance.
In our mortgage insurance business, the default and claim cycle begins with the receipt of a default notice from the loan servicer. Case reserves for losses are established upon receipt of notification from servicers that a borrower has missed two2 monthly payments, which is when we consider a loan to be in default for financial statement and internal tracking purposes. We also establish reserves for associated LAE, consisting of the estimated cost of the claims administration process, including legal and other fees and expenses associated with administering the claims process.
We do not establish reserves for loans that are in default if we believe that we will not be liable for the payment of a claim with respect to that default. We generally do not establish loss reserves for expected future claims on insured mortgages that are not in default. See “—Reserve for Premium Deficiency”below for an exception to these general principles.
With respect to loans that are in default, considerable judgment is exercised as to the adequacy of reserve levels. We use an actuarial projection methodology referred to as a “roll rate” analysis that uses historical claim frequency information to determine the projected ultimate Default to Claim Rates based on the Stage of Default and Time in Default as well as the date
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
that a loan goes into default. The Default to Claim Rate also includes our estimates with respect to expected Rescissions and Claim Denials,Loss Mitigation Activities, which have the effect of reducing our Default to Claim Rates.
After estimating the Default to Claim Rate, we estimate Claim Severity based on the average of recently observed severity rates within product type, type of insurance, and Time in Default cohorts. These average severity estimates are then applied to individual loan coverage amounts to determine reserves.
Estimating our case reserve for losses involves significant reliance upon assumptions and estimates with regard to the likelihood, magnitude and timing of each potential loss, including an estimate of the impact of our Loss Mitigation Activities. The models, assumptions and estimates we use to establish loss reserves may prove to be inaccurate, especially during an extended economic downturn or a period of extreme market volatility and uncertainty. As such, we cannot be certain that our reserve estimate will be adequate to cover ultimate losses on incurred defaults. This uncertainty requires management to use considerable judgment in estimating the rate at which these loans will result in claims.
We also establish reserves for defaults that we estimate have been incurred but have not been reported (“IBNR”) to us on a timely basis by the servicer, as well as for previous Rescissions, Claim Denials, and Claim Curtailments that we estimate will be reinstated and subsequently paid. We generally give the policyholder up to 30 days to challenge our decision to rescind coverage before we consider a policy to be rescinded and remove it from our defaulted inventory. We currently expect a significant percentage of claims that were denied to be resubmitted as a perfected claim and ultimately paid. All estimates are periodically reviewed and adjustments are made as they become necessary.
The impact to our reserve due to estimated future Loss Mitigation Activities incorporates our expectations regarding the number of policies that we expect to be reinstated as a result of our claims rebuttal process. Rescissions, Claim Denials and Claim Curtailments may occur for various reasons, including, without limitation, underwriting negligence, fraudulent applications and appraisals, breach of representations and warranties and inadequate documentation, primarily related to our insurance written in years prior to and including 2008.
We do not establish reserves for loans that are in default if we believe that we will not be liable for the payment of a claim with respect to that default. We generally do not establish loss reserves for expected future claims on insured mortgages that are not in default. See “—Reserve for Premium Deficiency”below for an exception to these general principles.
Unless a liability associated with such activities or discussions becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated, we consider our claim payments and our Rescissions, Claim Denials and Claim Curtailments to be resolved for financial reporting purposes. Under the accounting standard regarding contingencies, an estimated loss is accrued only if we determine that the loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. For populations of disputed Rescissions, Claim Denials and Claim Curtailments where we determine that a settlement is probable and that a loss can be reasonably estimated, we reflect our best estimate of the expected loss related to the populations under discussion in our financial statements, primarily as a component of our IBNR reserve. While our reserves include our best estimate of such losses, the outcome of the discussions or potential legal proceedings that could ensue is uncertain, and it is reasonably possible that a loss exists in excess of the amount accrued.
Radian Group Inc.
Notesboth known claims and incurred but unreported claims expected to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)be paid in the future for policies issued as of the balance sheet date. We provide for losses associated with these policies based upon our historical experience and other factors. However, by their nature, title claims can often be complex, vary greatly in dollar amounts, vary in number due to economic and market conditions such as an increase in mortgage foreclosures, and involve uncertainties as to ultimate exposure. Due to the length of time over which claim payments are made and regularly occurring changes in underlying economic and market conditions, these estimates are subject to variability.
Reserve for Premium Deficiency
Insurance enterprises are required to establish a PDR if the net present value of the expected future losses and expenses for a particular product line exceeds the net present value of expected future premiums and existing reserves for that product line. We reassess our expectations for premiums, losses and expenses for our mortgage insurance business at least quarterly and update our premium deficiency analyses accordingly. For our mortgage insurance business, we group our mortgage insurance products into two2 categories: first-lien and second-lien mortgage loans. As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, the combination of the net present value of our expected future premiums and existing reserves (net of reinsurance recoverables) significantly exceeded the net present value of our future expected losses and expenses associated with our first lien mortgage insurance portfolio. Our second-lien PDR, which was $0.2$0.1 million and $0.9$0.2 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018,
respectively, is recorded as a component of other liabilities.
Revenue Recognition—Insurance PremiumsRecognition
Mortgage Insurance
Premiums on mortgage insurance products are written on a recurring basis, either as monthly or annual premiums, or on a multi-year basis as a single premium. Monthly premiums written are earned as coverage is provided each month. For certain monthly policies where the billing is deferred for the first month’s coverage period, currently to the end of the policy, we record a net premium receivable representing the present value of such deferred premiums that we estimate will be collected at that future date. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, this net premium receivable was $29.7 million and $17.4 million, respectively, representing the present valuevalues of $77.0 million and $78.4 million, respectively, in contractual deferred monthly premiums, after adjustments for the estimated collectability and timing of future billing. We recognize changes in this receivable based on changes in the estimated amount and timing of such collections, including as a result of changes in observed trends as well as
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
our periodic review of our servicing guide and our operations and collections practices. Given the difference between the present value of the net premium receivable recorded and the contractual premiums due, such changes to the preceding factors could have a material effect on our results of operations in future periods if any changes are implemented.
Annual premiums written are initially recorded as unearned premiums and amortized on a monthly, straight-line basis.
Single premiums written are initially recorded as unearned premiums and earned over time based on the anticipated claim payment pattern, which includes historical industry experience and is updated periodically. During 2019, we updated the amortization rates due to the continuing increase in the significance of borrower-paid Single Premium Policies in our portfolio following our rate reductions on borrower-paid Single Premium Policies in 2018. Under HPA, most borrower-paid policies must be canceled automatically on the date the LTV is scheduled to reach 78% of the original value (or, if the loan is not current on that date, on the subsequent date that the loan becomes current). As a result, given the shift in our mix of Single Premium Policies toward more borrower-paid Single Premium Policies than lender-paid, the average anticipated term of our Single Premium IIF is declining compared to historical levels. We updated our analysis to reflect not only this anticipated effect of HPA cancellations on borrower-paid policies, but also changes in observed and projected loss patterns for both borrower-paid and lender-paid policies. Our results for 2019 include a $32.9 million increase in net premiums earned and a $0.12 increase in net income per share, resulting from a cumulative adjustment related to the updated amortization rates used to recognize revenue for Single Premium Policies.
When we rescind insurance coverage on a loan, we refund all premiums received in connection with such coverage. When insurance coverage on a loan is canceled due to claim payment, we refund all premiums received since the date of delinquency. When insurance coverage is cancelled for a reason other than Rescission or claim payment, all premium that is nonrefundable is immediately earned. Premium revenue is recognized net of our accrual for estimated premium refunds due to Rescissions or other factors, which accrual is presented in other liabilities.factors.
With respect to our reinsurance transactions, ceded premiums written on an annual or multi-year basis are initially set up as prepaid reinsurance and are amortized in a manner consistent with the recognition of income on direct premiums.
Title Insurance and Related Services
Title insurance premiums are typically duerecognized as revenue upon closing and earned in full whencompletion of the real estate transaction is closed.transaction. Premiums generally are calculated with reference to the policy amount. The premiumPremiums are charged by a title insurer or an agent is subject to regulationcustomers based on rates predetermined in most areas.coordination with each state's respective Department of Insurance. Such regulations vary from state to state. Premium revenues from agency title operations are primarily comprised of premiums recognized upon title order and completion of real estate transaction closing.
Revenue Recognition—Services
The FASB issued an updateOther title-related fees and income are closely related to title insurance premiums and are primarily associated with managing the accounting standard regardingclosing of real estate transactions. As such, revenue recognition, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which establishes principles for reporting information aboutis primarily recognized upon closing of the nature, amount, timingreal estate transaction or completion and uncertaintybilling of revenue and cash flows arising from our contracts with customers to provide services. We adopted this update effective January 1, 2018,offer title services that include tax and title data services; centralized recording services; document retrieval; default curative title services; deed reports; property reports, and other real estate or title-related activities. Expenses typically associated with premiums include third-party agent commissions and premium taxes.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
using the modified retrospective approach. The principle of this update requires an entity toWe recognize revenue representing the transfer of services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expectswe expect to be entitled to receive in exchange for those services, recognized as the performance obligations are satisfied.
This update is primarily applicable to revenues from our Services segment. This update did not change revenue recognition principles related to our investments and insurance products, which together represented the majority of our total revenue for 2018 and are subject to other GAAP guidance discussed elsewhere within our disclosures. See Note 1 “—Services” for information about the services we offer.
Revenue expected to be recognized in any future period related to remaining performance obligations, such as contracts where revenue is recognized as invoiced and contracts with variable consideration related to undelivered performance obligations, is not material.
Fee-for-Service Contracts
Generally, our contracts with our Services clients do not include minimum volume commitments and can be terminated at any time by our clients. Although some of our contracts and assignments are recurring in nature, and include repetitive monthly assignments, a portion of our engagements are transactional in nature. Due to the transactional nature of our business, our Services segment revenuesservices revenue may fluctuate from period to period as transactions are commenced or completed. We do not recognize revenue or expense
Prior to our January 2020 sale of Clayton, our services included transaction management services related to amounts advanced by usloan acquisition, RMBS securitization and subsequently reimbursed by clientsdistressed asset reviews and servicer and loan surveillance services. Also, through December 2020, we offered residential real estate appraisal services through a panel of independent contractor appraisers; however, consistent with increased market demand for maintenance or repairs, becausetechnology-driven solutions, in October 2020 we do not takeannounced the wind down of this traditional appraisal business, in order to focus on our digital valuation services that are expected to produce higher growth. Our remaining services and related revenue recognition considerations are as follows:
Valuation Services. We leverage technology and a quality control of the service priorprocess to the client taking control. We record an expense if an advance is made by us that is not in accordance with a client contract, and the client is not obligated to reimburse us.
Due to the nature of the services provided, our Services arrangements with customers may include fixed price contracts, and to a lesser extent, percentage-of-sale contracts.
Fixed-Price Contracts. Following the Clayton sale, we use fixed-price contracts in ourdeliver real estate valuation products and asset management business activities,services to our titlecustomers, which include: appraisal review products; hybrid/ancillary appraisal products; automated valuation products; interactive valuation products; and closing services, as well as our services related to single family rental services and contract underwriting. Prior to the Clayton sale, we also used fixed-price contracts in our surveillance business for our servicer oversight services and RMBS surveillance services. Under fixed-price contracts we agree to perform the specified services and deliverables for a pre-determined per-unit or per-filebroker price or day rate.opinions (BPOs). Each service qualifies as a separate performance obligation andfor which revenue is recognized as the service is performed isand made available to the client.
Percentage-of-Sale Contracts. Asset Management Services.Under percentage-of-sale contracts, we are paid We provide asset management services, which include management of the entire REO disposition process, services such as diligence and underwriting that serve the single family rental asset class, and a contractualweb-based workflow solution for task driven asset management, including the management of REO assets, rental properties, due diligence for bulk acquisitions, loss mitigation efforts and short sales. Revenue attributable to REO services provided is based on a percentage of the sale proceeds upon the sale of each property. These contracts are only used for a portion of our REO management services and our real estate brokerage services. In addition, through the use of our proprietary technology, property leads are sent to select clients. Revenue attributable to services provided under a percentage-of-sale contract is recognized over time, and measured based on the progress to date and typically coincides with the client’s successful closing on the property. The revenue recognized for these transactions is based on a percentage of the sale.
In certain instances, fees are received at the time that an asset is assigned to Radian
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
for management. These fees are recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized over time based on progress to date and the availability to customers.
Mortgage Services. We provide third-party contract underwriting services to our mortgage insurance customers. Generally, revenue is recognized when contract underwriting results are made available to the customer.
Cost of Services
Cost of services consists primarily of costs paid to outside vendors, including real estate agents that provide valuation and related services, as well as data acquisition costs and other compensation-related expenses to maintain software application platforms that directly support our businesses. Cost of services also includesfor employee compensation and related payroll benefits, as well as corresponding travel and related expenses incurred in providing such services to clients in our Services segment. Cost of services does not include an allocation of overhead costs.clients.
Leases
We determine if an arrangement includes a lease at inception, and if it does, we recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheet. Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and are recognized net of any payments made or received from the lessor. Lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease and are based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. In determining the net present value of lease payments, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date or as of our date of adoption, January 1, 2019.date.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. For lease agreements entered into after the adoption of a new accounting standard in 2019, leaseLease and non-lease components are generally not accounted for separately. For more information regarding this new accounting standard, see “—Recent Accounting Pronouncements—Accounting Standards Adopted During 2019” below. We have elected the short-term exemption for contracts with lease terms of 12 months or less.
Our lease agreements primarily relate to operating leases for office space we use in our operations. Certain of our leases include renewal options and/or termination options that we did not consider in the determination of the right-of-use asset or the lease liability as we did not believe it was reasonably certain that we would exercise such options. Our lease agreements do not contain any variable lease payments, material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Reinsurance
We cede insurance risk through the use of reinsurance contracts and follow reinsurance accounting for those transactions where significant risk is transferred. Loss reserves and unearned premiums are established before consideration is given to amounts related to our reinsurance agreements.
In accordance with the terms of the Single Premium QSR Program, rather than making a cash payment or transferring investments for ceded premiums written, Radian Guaranty holds the related amounts to collateralize the reinsurers’ obligations and has established a corresponding funds withheld liability. Any loss recoveries and any potential profit commission to Radian Guaranty will be realized from this account. The reinsurers’ share of earned premiums is paid from this account on a quarterly basis. This liability also includes an interest credit on funds withheld, which is recorded as ceded premiums at a rate specified in the agreement and, depending on experience under the contract, may be paid to either Radian Guaranty or the reinsurers. The ceding commission earned for premiums ceded pursuant to this transaction is attributable to other underwriting costs (including any related deferred policy acquisition costs). The unamortized portion of the ceding commission in excess of our related acquisition cost is reflected in other liabilities. Ceded premiums written are recorded on the balance sheet as prepaid reinsurance premiums and amortized to ceded premiums earned in a manner consistent with the recognition of income on direct premiums. See Note 8 for further discussion of our reinsurance transactions.
Variable Interest Entity
In connection with our reinsurance programs for our mortgage insurance business, we may enter into contracts with variable interest entities (“VIEs”).VIEs. VIEs include corporations, trusts or partnerships in which: (i) the entity has insufficient equity at risk to allow it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) at-risk equity holders, as a group, do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest.
We perform an evaluation to determine whether we are required to consolidate the VIE’s assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements, based on whether we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the variable interest holder that is determined to have the controlling financial interest as a result of having both: (i) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits from the VIE that potentially could be significant to the VIE. See Note 8 for additional information.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets, Net
Goodwill and other acquired intangible assets were established in connection with acquisitions. Goodwill is an asset representing the estimated future economic benefits arising from the assets we have acquired that were not individually identified and separately recognized, and includesrecognized. We generally perform our annual goodwill impairment test during the valuefourth quarter of discounted expected future cash flowseach year, using balances as of the entities acquired, the workforce, and expected synergies with our other affiliates and other unidentifiable intangible assets.prior quarter. Goodwill is deemed to have an indefinite useful life and is subject to review for impairment annually, or more frequently, whenever circumstances indicate potential impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit represents a business for which discrete financial information is available; more than one reporting unit may be aggregated into a single reporting unit if they have similar economic characteristics.available. We have concluded that we have one1 reporting unit, the ServicesReal Estate segment, for purposes of our goodwill impairment assessment. Events that could result in an interim assessment of goodwill impairment and/or a potential impairment charge include, but are not limited to: (i) a more-likely-than-not expectation of selling or disposing of all, or a portion, of a reporting unit; (ii) significant under-performance relative to historical or projected future operating results; (iii) significant changes in the strategy for the Services segment; (iv) significant negative industry or economic trends; and (v) a decline in Radian’s market capitalization below book value if such decline is attributable to the Services segment. Management
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
regularly updates certain assumptions related to our projections, including the likelihood of achieving the assumed potential revenues from new initiatives and business strategies, and if these or other items have a significant negative impact on the reporting unit’s projections we may perform additional analysis to determine whether an impairment charge is needed. Lower earnings over sustained periods also can lead to impairment of goodwill, which could result in a charge to earnings. The value of goodwill is primarily supported by revenue projections, which are mostly driven by projected transaction volume and margins.
Acquired intangible assets, other than goodwill, primarily consist of customer relationships and represents the value of the specifically acquired customer relationships and are valued using the excess earnings approach using estimated client revenues, attrition rates, implied royalty rates and discount rates. The excess earnings approach estimates the present value of expected earnings in excess of a traditional return on business assets.relationships. For financial reporting purposes, intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their applicable estimated useful lives in a manner that approximates the pattern of expected economic benefit from each intangible asset.
The calculation of the estimated fair value of goodwill and other acquired intangibles is performed primarily using an income approach and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions that are highly subjective in nature, such as attrition rates, discount rates, future expected cash flows, discount rates, attrition rates and market conditions. The most significant assumptions relate to the valuation of customer relationships. Our estimates are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. For more information on our accounting for goodwill and other acquired intangibles, including our impairment analysis policy, see Note 7.
Internal-use software, Property and Equipment
We capitalize certain costs associated with the development of internal-use software and the purchase of property and equipment. Software, property and equipment are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Amortization and depreciation commence during the month of our placement of the assets into use. Amortization and depreciation are calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the respective assets typically from threeand commence during the month of our placement of the assets into use. The estimated useful life used to calculate the amortization of internal-use software is generally seven years, unless factors indicate a shorter useful life.years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset improved or the remaining term of the lease. See Note 9The estimated useful life used to calculate the depreciation of furniture and equipment is generally three years. Depreciation and amortization expense associated with property and equipment for additional information.the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $18.3 million, $20.8 million and $19.4 million, respectively.
The following is a summary of the gross and net carrying amounts and accumulated amortization / depreciation (including impairment) of our property and equipment as of the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization /
Depreciation | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization /
Depreciation | | Net Carrying Amount |
| Internal-use software | | $ | 136,033 | | | $ | (81,724) | | | $ | 54,309 | | | $ | 131,854 | | | $ | (73,498) | | | $ | 58,356 | |
| Leasehold improvements | | 32,975 | | | (15,608) | | | 17,367 | | | 32,872 | | | (13,409) | | | 19,463 | |
| Furniture and equipment | | 65,478 | | | (56,697) | | | 8,781 | | | 65,087 | | | (55,027) | | | 10,060 | |
| Total | | $ | 234,486 | | | $ | (154,029) | | | $ | 80,457 | | | $ | 229,813 | | | $ | (141,934) | | | $ | 87,879 | |
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Incremental, direct costs associated with the successful acquisition of mortgage insurance policies, consisting of compensation, premium tax, and other policy issuance and underwriting expenses, are initially deferred and reported as deferred policy acquisition costs. Consistent with industry accounting practice, amortization of these costs for each underwriting year book of business is recognized in proportion to estimated gross profits over the estimated life of the policies.
Estimated gross profits are composed of earned premium, interest income, losses and LAE. Estimates of expected gross profit, including the Persistency Rate and loss development assumptions for each underwriting year used as a basis for amortization, are evaluated quarterly and the total amortization recorded to date is adjusted by a charge or credit to our consolidated statements of operations if actual experience or other evidence suggests that previous estimates should be revised. Considerable judgment is used in evaluating these estimates and the assumptions on which they are based. The use of different assumptions may have a significant effect on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs. Ceding commissions received under our reinsurance arrangements related to these costs are also deferred and accounted for using similar assumptions. See NotesNote 8 and 9 for additional information.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Earnings per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, while diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted-average number of dilutive potential common shares. Dilutive potential common shares relate primarily to our share-based compensation arrangements. For all calculations, the determination of whether potential common shares are dilutive or anti-dilutive is based on net income.
Accounting for Share-Based Compensation
The stock-based compensation cost related to share-based equity instruments is measured based on the grant-date fair value at the date of issuance.issuance, which for RSU awards is primarily determined by our common stock price on the date of grant. For share-based awards with performance conditions related to our own operations, the expense
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
recognized is dependent on the probability of the performance measure being achieved. Compensation cost is generally recognized over the periods that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. Any forfeitures of awards are recognized as they occur. See Note 1517 for further information.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted During 20192020
We adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases,2016-13 on January 1, 2019. Most significantly, this update requires2020 using the modified retrospective adoption approach. This ASU and the associated subsequent amendments require that financial assets measured at their amortized cost basis be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. Credit losses relating to our available-for-sale debt securities are recorded through an allowance for credit losses, rather than a lessee to recognize, aswrite-down of the lease commencement date, a liability to make lease payments and an asset, with respectthe amount of the allowance limited to its right to use the underlying asset foramount by which fair value is less than amortized cost. This allowance method will allow reversals of credit losses if the lease term. Upon adoption for contracts in effect asestimate of January 1, 2019, we recorded a lease liabilitycredit losses declines. This ASU also affected certain of $73.5 million within other liabilities,our accounts and a right-of-use assetnotes receivable, and certain of $49.4 million withinour other assets, corresponding toincluding reinsurance recoverables; however, the lease liability as adjusted for deferred rent and unamortized allowances and incentives of $24.1 million. We elected the optional transition method and the practical expedients for transitioning existing leases to the new standard as of the effective date. As a result of applying the practical expedients: (i) weupdate did not reassess expired or existing contracts to determine if they contain additional leases; (ii) we did not reassess the lease classification for expiredhave a material effect on our financial statements and existing leases; and (iii) we did not reassess initial direct costs for existing leases. Prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under previous lease guidance. We do not have material sublease agreements. As of December 31, 2019, there were 0 leases that had not yet commenced but that created significant rights and obligations for us.disclosures. See Note 135 for more information about our lease agreements.additional information.
We adopted ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees2019-04, Codification Improvements related to Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Derivatives and Other Costs,Hedging, and Financial Instruments on January 1, 2019. The new standard requires certain premiums on purchased callable debt securities to be amortized2020. This update to the earliest call date. The amortization periodaccounting standards regarding financial instruments and derivatives and hedging clarifies the accounting treatment for callable debt securities purchased at a discount will not be impacted.the measurement of credit losses and provides further clarification on previously issued updates. The adoption of this update did not have a material effect on our financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software. This ASU requires the capitalization of implementation costs for activities performed in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract. The new standard aligns the accounting for implementation costs of hosting arrangements that are service contracts with the accounting for capitalizing internal-use software. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We elected to early adopt this update effective December 31, 2019. The adoption of this update did not have a material effect on our financial statements and disclosures.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance. This ASU and the associated subsequent amendments require that financial assets measured at their amortized cost basis be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. Credit losses relating to our available-for-sale debt securities are to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses, rather than a write-down of the asset, with the amount of the allowance limited to the amount by which fair value is less than amortized cost. This allowance method will allow reversals of credit losses if the estimate of credit losses declines. This ASU will also affect certain of our accounts and notes receivable, including premiums receivable, and certain of our other assets, including reinsurance recoverables. However, this ASU is not applicable to the accounting for insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses. Due to the nature of our assets affected by this update, we do not expect it to have a material effect on our financial statements and disclosures. This update is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We will adopt this standard effective January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective adoption approach. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-12, Financial Services-Insurance.Services—Insurance. The new standard: (i) requires that assumptions used to measure the liability for future policy benefits be reviewed at least annually; (ii) defines and simplifies the measurement of market risk benefits; (iii) simplifies the amortization of deferred acquisition costs; and (iv) enhances the required disclosures about long-duration contracts. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021,2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact on our financial statements and future disclosures as a result of this update.
In AprilDecember 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements related to Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Derivatives and Hedging, and Financial Instruments.2019-12, Income Taxes—Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. This update simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the accounting standards regarding financial instruments and derivatives and hedging clarifies the accounting treatment for the measurementgeneral principles of credit losses and provides further clarification on previously issued updates.ASC Topic 740 in GAAP. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019,2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We will adopt this standard effective January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective adoption approach.permitted. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’sCompany's consolidated financial statements.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform—Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Reform on Financial Reporting. This update provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 Reference Rate Reform - Scope, to clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The amendments in these updates are optional and may be elected from the date of issuance through December 31, 2022, as reference rate reform activities occur. We are currently evaluating the impact of the guidance and our options related to the practical expedients.
In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-08, Codification Improvements to Subtopic 310-20, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. This update clarifies that an entity should reevaluate whether a callable debt security is within the scope of ASC paragraph 310-20-35-33 for each reporting period. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted. Entities are required to apply ASU 2020-08 on a prospective basis as of the beginning of the period of adoption for existing or newly purchased
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
callable debt securities. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
3. Net Income Per Share
The calculation of basic and diluted net income per share is as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net income—basic and diluted | | $ | 393,626 | | | $ | 672,309 | | | $ | 606,011 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Average common shares outstanding—basic | | 195,443 | | | 208,773 | | | 214,267 | |
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation arrangements (1) | | 1,199 | | | 1,567 | | | 4,286 | |
| Adjusted average common shares outstanding—diluted | | 196,642 | | | 210,340 | | | 218,553 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net income per share: | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 2.01 | | | $ | 3.22 | | | $ | 2.83 | |
| Diluted | | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | 3.20 | | | $ | 2.77 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | | | | | |
Net income—basic | $ | 672,309 |
| | $ | 606,011 |
| | $ | 121,088 |
|
| Adjustment for dilutive Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | (215 | ) |
Net income —diluted | $ | 672,309 |
| | $ | 606,011 |
| | $ | 120,873 |
|
| | | | | | |
Average common shares outstanding—basic | 208,773 |
| | 214,267 |
| | 215,321 |
|
| Dilutive effect of Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 and 2019 | — |
| | — |
| | 780 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation arrangements (1) | 1,567 |
| | 4,286 |
| | 4,305 |
|
| Adjusted average common shares outstanding—diluted | 210,340 |
| | 218,553 |
| | 220,406 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net income per share: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 3.22 |
| | $ | 2.83 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Diluted | $ | 3.20 |
| | $ | 2.77 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Shares of common stock equivalents | | 865 | | | 221 | | | 337 | |
| | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | The following number of shares of our common stock equivalents issued under our share-based compensation arrangements were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share because they were anti-dilutive: |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Shares of common stock equivalents | 221 |
| | 337 |
| | 353 |
|
4. Segment Reporting
We have 2 strategic business segments that we manage separately—Mortgage Insurance and Services. Adjusted pretaxReal Estate. Our Mortgage segment derives its revenue from mortgage insurance and other mortgage and risk services, including contract underwriting services provided to lenders. Our Real Estate segment offers a broad array of title, valuation, asset management and other real estate services to market participants across the real estate value chain. In addition, we report as All Other activities that include: (i) income (losses) from assets held by our holding company; (ii) related general corporate operating expenses not attributable or allocated to our reportable segments; (iii) for all periods through its sale in January 2020, income (loss)and expenses related to Clayton; (iv) for each segment represents segment results on a standalone basis; therefore, inter-segment eliminationsall periods presented, the income and reclassifications requiredexpenses related to our traditional appraisal services, which in October 2020 we announced we were winding down; and (v) other immaterial revenue and expense items, including entries to correct for consolidated GAAP presentation have not been reflected. Inter-segment activitiescertain immaterial adjustments.
Subsequent to the sale of Clayton, our Chief Executive Officer (Radian’s chief operating decision maker) implemented certain organizational changes that caused the composition of our reportable segments to change. As revised, the Company’s Mortgage and Real Estate segments are recorded at market ratesmanaged by our President of Mortgage and Co-Heads of Real Estate, respectively, who are responsible for the overall profitability of their respective segments and who are directly accountable to our chief operating decision maker.
These segment reporting changes align with the changes in personnel reporting lines, management oversight and eliminatedbranding following the sale of Clayton, and are consistent with the way our chief operating decision maker began assessing the performance of our reportable segments and other business activities effective in consolidation.the first quarter of 2020. All changes in 2020 to the composition of our reportable segments have been reflected in our segment operating results for all periods presented. See Note 1 for additional details about our Mortgage and Real Estate businesses.
We allocate corporate operating expenses to our Mortgage Insurance segment: (i) corporate expensesboth reportable segments based on theeach segment’s forecasted annual percentage of total revenue, which approximates the estimated percentage of management time spent on the segment; (ii) except as described below for periods prior to January 1, 2019,each segment. In addition, we allocate all interest expense; and (iii) all net investment income from corporate cash and investments. Effective January 1, 2019, Radian Group recapitalized the Services segment with a capital contribution that enabled the Services segment to repay the Clayton Intercompany Note and its accumulated allocated interest expense associated with the note, and thereafter, all interest expense is allocated to our Mortgage Insurance segment.
We allocate to our Services segment: (i) corporate expenses based on the segment’s forecasted annual percentage of total revenue, which approximates the estimated percentage of time spent on the segment, and (ii) until January 1, 2019, the allocated interest expense relateddue to the Clayton Intercompany Note as described above.capital-intensive nature of our mortgage insurance business.
With the exception of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets that relate to our ServicesReal Estate segment, which are reviewed as part of our annual goodwill impairment assessment, we do not manage assets by segment.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Adjusted Pretax Operating Income (Loss)
Our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer (Radian’s chief operating decision maker), uses adjusted pretax operating income (loss) as our primary measure to evaluate the fundamental financial performance of each of Radian’s business segments and to allocate resources to the segments. Adjusted pretax operating income (loss) is defined as pretax income (loss) from continuing operations excluding the effects of: (i) net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments; (ii) loss on extinguishment of debt; (iii) amortization and impairment of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets; and (iv) impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items, such as gains (losses) from the sale of lines of business and acquisition-related expenses.
Although adjusted pretax operating income (loss) excludes certain items that have occurred in the past and are expected to occur in the future, the excluded items represent those that are: (i) not viewed as part of the operating performance of our primary activities or (ii) not expected to result in an economic impact equal to the amount reflected in pretax income.income (loss). These adjustments, along with the reasons for their treatment, are described below.
| |
(1) | Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments. The recognition of realized investment gains or losses can vary significantly across periods as the activity is highly discretionary based on the timing of individual securities sales due to such factors as market opportunities, our tax and capital profile and overall market cycles. Unrealized gains and losses arise primarily from changes in the market value of our investments that are classified as trading or equity securities. These valuation adjustments may not necessarily result in realized economic gains or losses.
|
(1)Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments. The recognition of realized investment gains or losses can vary significantly across periods as the activity is highly discretionary based on the timing of individual securities sales due to such factors as market opportunities, our tax and capital profile and overall market cycles. Unrealized gains and losses arise primarily from changes in the market value of our investments that are classified as trading or equity securities. These valuation adjustments may not necessarily result in realized economic gains or losses.
Trends in the profitability of our fundamental operating activities can be more clearly identified without the fluctuations of these realized and unrealized gains or losses and changes in fair value of other financial instruments. We do not view them to be indicative of our fundamental operating activities.
(2)Loss on extinguishment of debt. Gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt and losses incurred to purchase our debt prior to maturity are discretionary activities that are undertaken in order to take advantage of market opportunities to strengthen our financial and capital positions; therefore, we do not view these activities as part of our operating performance. Such transactions do not reflect expected future operations and do not provide meaningful insight regarding our current or past operating trends.
| |
(2) | Loss on extinguishment of debt. Gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt and losses incurred to purchase our debt prior to maturity are discretionary activities that are undertaken in order to take advantage of market opportunities to strengthen our financial and capital positions; therefore, we do not view these activities as part of our operating performance. Such transactions do not reflect expected future operations and do not provide meaningful insight regarding our current or past operating trends.
|
| |
| (3) | Amortization and impairment of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets. Amortization of acquired intangible assets represents the periodic expense required to amortize the cost of acquired intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Acquired intangible assets are also periodically reviewed for potential impairment, and impairment adjustments are made whenever appropriate. We do not view these charges as part of the operating performance of our primary activities.
|
| |
(4) | Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items. Includes activities that we do not view to be indicative of our fundamental operating activities, such as: (i) gains (losses) from the sale of lines of business and impairment of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets. Amortization of acquired intangible assets represents the periodic expense required to amortize the cost of acquired intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Acquired intangible assets are also periodically reviewed for potential impairment, and impairment adjustments are made whenever appropriate. We do not view these charges as part of the operating performance of our primary activities.
(4)Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items. Includes activities that we do not view to be indicative of our fundamental operating activities, such as: (i) impairment of internal-use software and other long-lived assets; (ii) gains (losses) from the sale of lines of business; and (iii) acquisition-related expenses. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The reconciliation of adjusted pretax operating income (loss) for our reportable segments to consolidated pretax income is as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Adjusted pretax operating income (loss): | | | | | | |
| Mortgage | | $ | 451,488 | | | $ | 852,854 | | | $ | 770,714 | |
| Real Estate | | (23,240) | | | (17,987) | | | (4,005) | |
Total adjusted pretax operating income (loss) for reportable
segments | | 428,248 | | | 834,867 | | | 766,709 | |
| All Other adjusted pretax operating income (loss) | | 3,819 | | | 19,768 | | | (21,214) | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 60,277 | | | 51,719 | | | (42,476) | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | 0 | | | (22,738) | | | 0 | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | 0 | | | (4,828) | | | 0 | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | (5,144) | | | (22,288) | | | (12,429) | |
| Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items | | (7,759) | | | (7,507) | | | (6,404) | |
| Consolidated pretax income | | $ | 479,441 | | | $ | 848,993 | | | $ | 684,186 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Adjusted pretax operating income (loss): | | | | | |
| Mortgage insurance | $ | 868,898 |
| | $ | 772,614 |
| | $ | 651,015 |
|
Services (1) | (14,263 | ) | | (27,119 | ) | | (33,840 | ) |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 51,719 |
| | (42,476 | ) | | 3,621 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | (22,738 | ) | | — |
| | (51,469 | ) |
| Impairment of goodwill | (4,828 | ) | | — |
| | (184,374 | ) |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | (22,288 | ) | | (12,429 | ) | | (27,671 | ) |
| Impairment of other long-lived assets and other non-operating items | (7,507 | ) | | (6,404 | ) | | (10,545 | ) |
| Consolidated pretax income | $ | 848,993 |
| | $ | 684,186 |
| | $ | 346,737 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes inter-segment revenues as reflected in the tables below. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Revenue and Other Segment Information
The following tables reconcile reportable segment revenues to consolidated revenues and summarize interest expense, depreciation expense, allocation of corporate operating expenses and adjusted pretax operating income for our reportable segments as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2020 |
| (In thousands) | | Mortgage | | Real Estate | | Reportable Segment Total | | All Other | | Inter-segment | | Adjustments | | Consolidated Total |
| Net premiums earned | | $ | 1,092,767 | | | $ | 22,554 | | | $ | 1,115,321 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,115,321 | |
| Services revenue | | 14,765 | | | 79,524 | | | 94,289 | | | 12,535 | | | (1,439) | | | 0 | | | 105,385 | |
| Net investment income | | 137,195 | | | 361 | | | 137,556 | | | 16,481 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 154,037 | |
| Other income | | 2,816 | | | 0 | | | 2,816 | | | 534 | | | 0 | | | 247 | | | 3,597 | |
| Add: Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 60,277 | | | 60,277 | |
| Total revenues | | $ | 1,247,543 | | | $ | 102,439 | | | $ | 1,349,982 | | | $ | 29,550 | | | $ | (1,439) | | | $ | 60,524 | | | $ | 1,438,617 | |
| Other segment information: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | $ | 71,150 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 71,150 | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | | 9,815 | | | 2,559 | | | 12,374 | | | | | | | | | |
Allocation of corporate operating expenses (1) | | 114,802 | | | 12,807 | | | 127,609 | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Includes additional depreciation expense of $2.6 million, $0.3 million and $2.9 million allocated to Mortgage, Real Estate and Reportable Segment Total, respectively.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | | Mortgage | | Real Estate | | Reportable Segment Total | | All Other | | Inter-segment | | Adjustments | | Consolidated Total |
| Net premiums earned | | $ | 1,134,214 | | | $ | 11,976 | | | $ | 1,146,190 | | | $ | (841) | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,145,349 | |
| Services revenue | | 8,134 | | | 76,941 | | | 85,075 | | | 70,961 | | | (1,440) | | | 0 | | | 154,596 | |
| Net investment income | | 151,491 | | | 680 | | | 152,171 | | | 19,625 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 171,796 | |
| Other income | | 2,798 | | | 0 | | | 2,798 | | | 697 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 3,495 | |
| Add: Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 51,719 | | | 51,719 | |
| Total revenues | | $ | 1,296,637 | | | $ | 89,597 | | | $ | 1,386,234 | | | $ | 90,442 | | | $ | (1,440) | | | $ | 51,719 | | | $ | 1,526,955 | |
| Other segment information: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | $ | 56,310 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 56,310 | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | | 13,770 | | | 2,169 | | | 15,939 | | | | | | | | | |
Allocation of corporate operating expenses (1) | | 104,078 | | | 10,165 | | | 114,243 | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Includes additional depreciation expense of $1.6 million, $0.1 million and $1.7 million allocated to Mortgage, Real Estate and Reportable Segment Total, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | Mortgage Insurance | | Services | | Reportable Segment Total | | Inter-segment | | Adjustments | | Consolidated Total |
| Premiums earned | $ | 1,134,214 |
| | $ | 11,135 |
| | $ | 1,145,349 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,145,349 |
|
| Services revenue | — |
| | 158,629 |
| | 158,629 |
| | (4,033 | ) | | — |
| | 154,596 |
|
| Net investment income | 171,116 |
| | 680 |
| | 171,796 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 171,796 |
|
| Other income | 3,495 |
| | — |
| | 3,495 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,495 |
|
| Add: Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 51,719 |
| | 51,719 |
|
| Total revenues | $ | 1,308,825 |
| | $ | 170,444 |
| | $ | 1,479,269 |
| | $ | (4,033 | ) | | $ | 51,719 |
| | $ | 1,526,955 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other segment information: | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Interest expense | $ | 56,310 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 56,310 |
| | | | | |
|
|
| Depreciation | 15,317 |
| | 3,684 |
| | 19,001 |
| | | | | |
|
|
Allocation of corporate operating expenses (1) | 104,078 |
| | 16,943 |
| | 121,021 |
| | | | | |
|
|
124
______________________
| |
(1) | Includes additional depreciation expense of $1.6 million, $0.2 million and $1.8 million allocated to Mortgage Insurance, Services and Reportable Segment Total, respectively. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| (In thousands) | | Mortgage | | Real Estate | | Reportable Segment Total | | All Other | | Inter-segment | | Adjustments | | Consolidated Total |
| Net premiums earned | | $1,006,721 | | $ | 7,286 | | | $ | 1,014,007 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,014,007 | |
| Services revenue | | 4,968 | | | 79,080 | | | 84,048 | | | 62,574 | | | (1,650) | | | 0 | | | 144,972 | |
| Net investment income | | 148,274 | | | 373 | | | 148,647 | | | 3,828 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 152,475 | |
| Other income | | 2,214 | | | 1,234 | | | 3,448 | | | 580 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 4,028 | |
| Add: Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (42,476) | | | (42,476) | |
| Total revenues | | $ | 1,162,177 | | | $ | 87,973 | | | $ | 1,250,150 | | | $ | 66,982 | | | $ | (1,650) | | | $ | (42,476) | | | $ | 1,273,006 | |
| Other segment information: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | $ | 43,685 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 43,685 | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation | | 14,714 | | | 1,395 | | | 16,109 | | | | | | | | | |
Allocation of corporate operating expenses (1) | | 80,135 | | | 8,382 | | | 88,517 | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| (In thousands) | Mortgage Insurance | | Services | | Reportable Segment Total | | Inter-segment | | Adjustments | | Consolidated Total |
| Premiums earned | $ | 1,006,721 |
| | $ | 7,286 |
| | $ | 1,014,007 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,014,007 |
|
| Services revenue | — |
| | 148,217 |
| | 148,217 |
| | (3,245 | ) | | — |
| | 144,972 |
|
| Net investment income | 152,102 |
| | 373 |
| | 152,475 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 152,475 |
|
| Other income | 2,794 |
| | 1,234 |
| | 4,028 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,028 |
|
| Add: Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (42,476 | ) | | (42,476 | ) |
| Total revenues | $ | 1,161,617 |
| | $ | 157,110 |
| | $ | 1,318,727 |
| | $ | (3,245 | ) | | $ | (42,476 | ) | | $ | 1,273,006 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other segment information: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | $ | 43,685 |
| | $ | 17,805 |
| | $ | 61,490 |
| | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 15,229 |
| | 3,563 |
| | 18,792 |
| | | | | | |
Allocation of corporate operating expenses (1) | 80,134 |
| | 11,974 |
| | 92,108 |
| | | | | | |
______________________(1) | |
(1) | Includes additional depreciation expense of $0.5 million, $0.1 million and $0.6 million allocated to Mortgage Insurance, Services and Reportable Segment Total, respectively. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Mortgage Insurance | | Services | | Reportable Segment Total | | Inter-segment | | Adjustments | | Consolidated Total |
| Premiums earned | $ | 932,773 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 932,773 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 932,773 |
|
| Services revenue | — |
| | 161,833 |
| | 161,833 |
| | (6,730 | ) | | — |
| | 155,103 |
|
| Net investment income | 127,248 |
| | — |
| | 127,248 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 127,248 |
|
| Other income | 2,886 |
| | — |
| | 2,886 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,886 |
|
| Add: Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,621 |
| | 3,621 |
|
| Total revenues | $ | 1,062,907 |
| | $ | 161,833 |
| | $ | 1,224,740 |
| | $ | (6,730 | ) | | $ | 3,621 |
| | $ | 1,221,631 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other segment information: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | $ | 45,016 |
| | $ | 17,745 |
| | $ | 62,761 |
| | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 13,315 |
| | 3,758 |
| | 17,073 |
| | | | | | |
Allocation of corporate operating expenses (1) | 55,441 |
| | 14,319 |
| | 69,760 |
| | | | | | |
______________________ | |
(1) | Includes additional depreciation expense of $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.3 million allocated to Mortgage Insurance, Services and Reportable Segment Total, respectively. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes$0.5 million, $0.1 million and $0.6 million allocated to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The table below represents the disaggregation of services revenues by revenue type:type.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Real Estate services: | | | | | | |
| Asset management services | | $ | 29,841 | | | $ | 30,846 | | | $ | 42,839 | |
| Title services | | 23,266 | | | 14,185 | | | 5,512 | |
| Valuation services | | 22,582 | | | 29,026 | | | 30,269 | |
| Other real estate services | | 2,479 | | | 2,431 | | | 0 | |
| Mortgage services | | 14,682 | | | 7,632 | | | 4,307 | |
All Other services (1) | | 12,535 | | | 70,476 | | | 62,045 | |
| Total services revenue | | $ | 105,385 | | | $ | 154,596 | | | $ | 144,972 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Services revenue | | | | | |
Mortgage Services (1) | $ | 74,007 |
| | $ | 76,050 |
| | $ | 77,121 |
|
| Real Estate Services | 64,945 |
| | 60,059 |
| | 54,649 |
|
| Title Services | 15,644 |
| | 8,863 |
| | 23,333 |
|
| Total services revenue | $ | 154,596 |
| | $ | 144,972 |
| | $ | 155,103 |
|
______________________(1) | |
(1) | Includes $48.4 million, $50.8 million and $46.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to Clayton, which was sold in January 2020. |
Our Services segment revenues are recognized over timeIncludes services revenue from Clayton prior to its sale in January 2020 and measured each period based on the progress to date as services are performed and made available to customers. Our contracts with customers, including payment terms, are generally short-term in nature; therefore, any impactamounts related to timing is immaterial. our traditional appraisal business, which we wound down beginning in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Revenue recognized related to services made available to customers and billed is reflected in accounts and notes receivable. Accounts and notes receivable included $18.8 million and $10.8 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, related to services revenue contracts. Revenue recognized related to services performed and not yet billed is recorded in unbilled receivables and reflected in other assets. Deferred revenue, which represents advance payments received from customers in advance of revenue recognition, is immaterial for all periods presented. We have 0 material bad-debt expense. The following represents balances related to service revenue contracts as of the dates indicated:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | December 31, 2019 (1) | | December 31, 2018 |
| Accounts receivable | $ | 10,773 |
| | $ | 15,461 |
|
| Unbilled receivables | 13,772 |
| | 19,917 |
|
| Deferred revenues | 1,784 |
| | 3,204 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Excludes $10.5 million and $3.9 million of accounts receivable and unbilled receivables, respectively, that are related to Clayton and classified as held-for-sale. |
There was 01 single customer that accounted for more than 10% of NIW in 2020, as compared to NaN in 2019 or 2018. There was 0 single customer that accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues (excluding net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments) in 2020, 2019 2018 or 2017.2018.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following istables include a list of assets that are measured at fair value by hierarchy level as of December 31, 2019:2020 and 2019.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | Level I | | Level II | | Total |
| Assets at fair value | | | | | |
| Investments: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 143,884 |
| | $ | 35,700 |
| | $ | 179,584 |
|
| State and municipal obligations | — |
| | 119,994 |
| | 119,994 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | — |
| | 2,237,611 |
| | 2,237,611 |
|
| RMBS | — |
| | 779,354 |
| | 779,354 |
|
| CMBS | — |
| | 608,015 |
| | 608,015 |
|
| Other ABS | — |
| | 759,129 |
| | 759,129 |
|
| Foreign government and agency securities | — |
| | 5,224 |
| | 5,224 |
|
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | 143,884 |
| | 4,545,027 |
| | 4,688,911 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Trading securities: | | | | | |
| State and municipal obligations | — |
| | 118,949 |
| | 118,949 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | — |
| | 147,232 |
| | 147,232 |
|
| RMBS | — |
| | 16,180 |
| | 16,180 |
|
| CMBS | — |
| | 34,789 |
| | 34,789 |
|
| Total trading securities | — |
| | 317,150 |
| | 317,150 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Equity securities | 124,009 |
| | 6,212 |
| | 130,221 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Short-term investments: | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | 127,152 |
| | — |
| | 127,152 |
|
| State and municipal obligations | — |
| | 21,475 |
| | 21,475 |
|
| Money market instruments | 202,461 |
| | — |
| | 202,461 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | — |
| | 20,298 |
| | 20,298 |
|
Other investments (1) | — |
| | 147,007 |
| | 147,007 |
|
| Total short-term investments | 329,613 |
| | 188,780 |
| | 518,393 |
|
| | | | | | |
Total investments at fair value (2) | 597,506 |
| | 5,057,169 |
| | 5,654,675 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Other assets: | | | | | |
Loaned securities: (3) | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | 35,309 |
| | — |
| | 35,309 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | — |
| | 3,669 |
| | 3,669 |
|
| Equity securities | 27,464 |
| | — |
| | 27,464 |
|
Total assets at fair value (2) | $ | 660,279 |
| | $ | 5,060,838 |
| | $ | 5,721,117 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Comprising short-term certificates of deposit and commercial paper. |
| |
(2) | Does not include other invested assets of $2.6 million that are primarily invested in limited partnership investments valued using the net asset value as a practical expedient and $1.5 million invested in a private convertible promissory note. |
| |
(3) | Securities loaned to third-party borrowers under securities lending agreements are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 6 for more information. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | Level I | | Level II | | Level III | | Total | |
| Assets at fair value as of December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Investments: | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | $ | 140,034 | | | $ | 29,189 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 169,223 | | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 0 | | | 165,271 | | | 0 | | | 165,271 | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 0 | | | 3,047,189 | | | 0 | | | 3,047,189 | | |
| RMBS | | 0 | | | 833,939 | | | 0 | | | 833,939 | | |
| CMBS | | 0 | | | 681,265 | | | 0 | | | 681,265 | | |
| CLO | | 0 | | | 568,558 | | | 0 | | | 568,558 | | |
| Other ABS | | 0 | | | 252,457 | | | 0 | | | 252,457 | | |
| Foreign government and agency securities | | 0 | | | 5,438 | | | 0 | | | 5,438 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | | 140,034 | | | 5,583,306 | | | 0 | | | 5,723,340 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Trading securities: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 0 | | | 120,449 | | | 0 | | | 120,449 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 0 | | | 123,142 | | | 0 | | | 123,142 | | |
| RMBS | | 0 | | | 13,000 | | | 0 | | | 13,000 | | |
| CMBS | | 0 | | | 34,294 | | | 0 | | | 34,294 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total trading securities | | 0 | | | 290,885 | | | 0 | | | 290,885 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Equity securities | | 142,761 | | | 8,479 | | | 0 | | | 151,240 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 0 | | | 21,819 | | | 0 | | | 21,819 | | |
| Money market instruments | | 268,900 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 268,900 | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 0 | | | 30,495 | | | 0 | | | 30,495 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other ABS | | 0 | | | 219 | | | 0 | | | 219 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other investments (1) | | 0 | | | 296,571 | | | 0 | | | 296,571 | | |
| Total short-term investments | | 268,900 | | | 349,104 | | | 0 | | | 618,004 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other invested assets (2) | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 3,000 | | | 3,000 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total investments at fair value (2) | | 551,695 | | | 6,231,774 | | | 3,000 | | | 6,786,469 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other: | | | | | | | | | |
Embedded derivatives (3) | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 5,513 | | | 5,513 | | |
Loaned securities: (4) | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | 4,876 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 4,876 | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 0 | | | 31,324 | | | 0 | | | 31,324 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Equity securities | | 21,299 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 21,299 | | |
Total assets at fair value (2) | | $ | 577,870 | | | $ | 6,263,098 | | | $ | 8,513 | | | $ | 6,849,481 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The following is a list(1)Comprising short-term certificates of deposit and commercial paper.
(2)Does not include other invested assets of $2.0 million that are measured at fairprimarily invested in limited partnership investments valued using the net asset value by hierarchy level as of December 31, 2018:a practical expedient.
(3)Embedded derivatives related to our Excess-of-Loss Program are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 8 for more information about our reinsurance programs.
(4)Securities loaned to third-party borrowers under securities lending agreements are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 6 for more information.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | Level I | | Level II | | Total |
| Assets at fair value | | | | | |
| Investments: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 55,658 |
| | $ | 28,412 |
| | $ | 84,070 |
|
| State and municipal obligations | — |
| | 138,313 |
| | 138,313 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | — |
| | 2,222,473 |
| | 2,222,473 |
|
| RMBS | — |
| | 332,142 |
| | 332,142 |
|
| CMBS | — |
| | 539,915 |
| | 539,915 |
|
| Other ABS | — |
| | 704,662 |
| | 704,662 |
|
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | 55,658 |
| | 3,965,917 |
| | 4,021,575 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Trading securities: | | | | | |
| State and municipal obligations | — |
| | 168,359 |
| | 168,359 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | — |
| | 228,152 |
| | 228,152 |
|
| RMBS | — |
| | 21,082 |
| | 21,082 |
|
| CMBS | — |
| | 51,478 |
| | 51,478 |
|
| Total trading securities | — |
| | 469,071 |
| | 469,071 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Equity securities | 126,607 |
| | 3,958 |
| | 130,565 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Short-term investments: | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | 133,657 |
| | — |
| | 133,657 |
|
| State and municipal obligations | — |
| | 18,070 |
| | 18,070 |
|
| Money market instruments | 95,132 |
| | — |
| | 95,132 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | — |
| | 105,625 |
| | 105,625 |
|
| Other ABS | — |
| | 806 |
| | 806 |
|
Other investments (1) | — |
| | 175,113 |
| | 175,113 |
|
| Total short-term investments | 228,789 |
| | 299,614 |
| | 528,403 |
|
| | | | | | |
Total investments at fair value (2) | 411,054 |
| | 4,738,560 |
| | 5,149,614 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Other assets: | | | | | |
Loaned securities: (3) | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | 9,987 |
| | — |
| | 9,987 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | — |
| | 7,818 |
| | 7,818 |
|
| Equity securities | 10,055 |
| | — |
| | 10,055 |
|
Total assets at fair value (2) | $ | 431,096 |
| | $ | 4,746,378 |
| | $ | 5,177,474 |
|
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | Level I | | Level II | | Level III | | Total | |
| Assets at fair value as of December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Investments: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | $ | 143,884 | | | $ | 35,700 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 179,584 | | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 0 | | | 119,994 | | | 0 | | | 119,994 | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 0 | | | 2,237,611 | | | 0 | | | 2,237,611 | | |
| RMBS | | 0 | | | 779,354 | | | 0 | | | 779,354 | | |
| CMBS | | 0 | | | 588,420 | | | 0 | | | 588,420 | | |
| CLO | | 0 | | | 462,561 | | | 0 | | | 462,561 | | |
| Other ABS | | 0 | | | 316,163 | | | 0 | | | 316,163 | | |
| Foreign government and agency securities | | 0 | | | 5,224 | | | 0 | | | 5,224 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | | 143,884 | | | 4,545,027 | | | 0 | | | 4,688,911 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Trading securities: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 0 | | | 118,949 | | | 0 | | | 118,949 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 0 | | | 147,232 | | | 0 | | | 147,232 | | |
| RMBS | | 0 | | | 16,180 | | | 0 | | | 16,180 | | |
| CMBS | | 0 | | | 34,789 | | | 0 | | | 34,789 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total trading securities | | 0 | | | 317,150 | | | 0 | | | 317,150 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity securities | | 124,009 | | | 6,212 | | | 0 | | | 130,221 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | 127,152 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 127,152 | | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 0 | | | 21,475 | | | 0 | | | 21,475 | | |
| Money market instruments | | 202,461 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 202,461 | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 0 | | | 20,298 | | | 0 | | | 20,298 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other investments (1) | | 0 | | | 147,007 | | | 0 | | | 147,007 | | |
| Total short-term investments | | 329,613 | | | 188,780 | | | 0 | | | 518,393 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Other invested assets (2) | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1,500 | | | 1,500 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total investments at fair value (2) | | 597,506 | | | 5,057,169 | | | 1,500 | | | 5,656,175 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Other: | | | | | | | | | |
Embedded derivatives (3) | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 383 | | | 383 | | |
Loaned securities: (4) | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | 35,309 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 35,309 | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 0 | | | 3,669 | | | 0 | | | 3,669 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Equity securities | | 27,464 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 27,464 | | |
Total assets at fair value (2) | | $ | 660,279 | | | $ | 5,060,838 | | | $ | 1,883 | | | $ | 5,723,000 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1)______________________Comprising short-term certificates of deposit and commercial paper.
| |
(1) | Comprising short-term certificates of deposit and commercial paper. |
| |
(2) | (2)Does not include other invested assets of $3.4 million that are primarily invested in limited partnerships valued using the net asset value as a practical expedient. |
| |
(3) | Securities loaned to third-party borrowers under securities lending agreements are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 6 for more information. |
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 0 material Level III assets measured at fairof $2.6 million that are primarily invested in limited partnership investments valued using the net asset value and 0 Level III liabilities. as a practical expedient.
(3)Embedded derivatives related to our Excess-of-Loss Program are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 8 for more information about our reinsurance programs.
(4)Securities loaned to third-party borrowers under securities lending agreements are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 6 for more information.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
There were 0 investment transfers to or from Level III for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019. Activity
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
related to Level III assets and liabilities (including realized and unrealized gains and losses, purchases, sales, issuances, settlements and transfers) was immaterial for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019.
Valuation Methodologies for Assets Measured at Fair Value
The following are descriptions of our valuation methodologies for financial assets measured at fair value.
We are responsible for the determination of the value of all investments carried at fair value and the supporting methodologies and assumptions. To assist us in this responsibility, we utilize independent third-party valuation service providers to gather, analyze and interpret market information and estimate fair values based upon relevant methodologies and assumptions for various asset classes and individual securities. We perform monthly quantitative and qualitative analyses on the prices received from third parties to determine whether the prices are reasonable estimates of fair value. Our analysis includes: (i) a review of the methodology used by third-party pricing services; (ii) a comparison of pricing services’ valuations to other independent sources; (iii) a review of month-to-month price fluctuations; and (iv) a comparison of actual purchase and sale transactions with valuations received from third parties. These processes are designed to ensure that our investment values are accurately recorded, that the data inputs and valuation techniques utilized are appropriate and consistently applied and that the assumptions are reasonable and consistent with the objective of determining fair value.
U.S. Government and Agency Securities. The fair value of U.S. government and agency securities is estimated using observed market transactions, including broker-dealer quotes and actual trade activity as a basis for valuation. U.S. government and agency securities are categorized in either Level I or Level II of the fair value hierarchy.
State and Municipal Obligations. The fair value of state and municipal obligations is estimated using recent transaction activity, including market observations. Valuation models are used, which incorporate bond structure, yield curve, credit spreads and other factors. These securities are generally categorized in Level II of the fair value hierarchy or in Level III when market-based transaction activity is unavailable.
Money Market Instruments. The fair value of money market instruments is based on daily prices, which are published and available to all potential investors and market participants. As such, these securities are categorized in Level I of the fair value hierarchy.
Corporate Bonds and Notes. The fair value of corporate bonds and notes is estimated using recent transaction activity, including market observations. Spread models are used that incorporate issuer and structure characteristics, such as credit risk and early redemption features, where applicable. These securities are generally categorized in Level II of the fair value hierarchy or in Level III when market-based transaction activity is unavailable.
RMBS, CMBS, CLO and Other ABS. The fair value of these instruments is estimated based on prices of comparable securities and spreads and observable prepayment speeds. These securities are generally categorized in Level II of the fair value hierarchy or in Level III when market-based transaction activity is unavailable. The fair value of any Level III securities is generally estimated by discounting estimated future cash flows.
Foreign Government and Agency Securities. The fair value of foreign government and agency securities is estimated using observed market yields used to create a maturity curve and observed credit spreads from market makers and broker-dealers. These securities are categorized in Level II of the fair value hierarchy.
Equity Securities. The fair value of these securities is generally estimated using observable market data in active markets or bid prices from market makers and broker-dealers. Generally, these securities are categorized in Level I or II of the fair value hierarchy, as observable market data are readily available. From time to time, certain equity securities may be categorized in Level III of the fair value hierarchy due to a lack of market-based transaction data or the use of model-based valuations.
Other Investments. These securities primarily consist of commercial paper and short-term certificates of deposit, which are categorized in Level II of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of these investments is estimated using market data for comparable instruments of similar maturity and average yield.
Other Invested Assets. These other invested assets represent a promissory note receivable. The estimated fair value approximates its cost due to the short-term nature of the note.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Other Fair Value Disclosure
The carrying value and estimated fair value of other selected liabilities not carried at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets were as follows as of the dates indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | | Carrying
Amount | | Estimated
Fair Value | | Carrying
Amount | | Estimated
Fair Value |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Senior notes | | $ | 1,405,674 | | | $ | 1,563,503 | | | $ | 887,110 | | | $ | 949,500 | |
| FHLB advances | | 176,483 | | | 179,578 | | | 134,875 | | | 135,997 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| (In thousands) | Carrying Amount | | Estimated Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Estimated Fair Value |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Senior notes | $ | 887,110 |
| | $ | 949,500 |
| | $ | 1,030,348 |
| | $ | 1,007,687 |
|
| FHLB advances | 134,875 |
| | 135,997 |
| | 82,532 |
| | 82,899 |
|
The fair value of our senior notes is estimated based on the quoted market prices. The fair value of our FHLB advances is estimated based on expected cash flows for similar borrowings. These liabilities are categorized in Level II of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 12 for further information.information about these borrowings.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
6. Investments
Available for Sale Securities
Our available for sale securities within our investment portfolio consisted of the following as of the dates indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2020 |
| (In thousands) | | Amortized
Cost | | Allowance for Credit Losses | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Fair Value |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | $ | 176,033 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,677 | | | $ | (3,611) | | | $ | 174,099 | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 149,258 | | | 0 | | | 16,113 | | | (100) | | | 165,271 | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 2,832,350 | | | (948) | | | 250,771 | | | (3,758) | | | 3,078,415 | |
| RMBS | | 799,814 | | | 0 | | | 34,439 | | | (314) | | | 833,939 | |
| CMBS | | 645,071 | | | 0 | | | 39,495 | | | (3,301) | | | 681,265 | |
| CLO | | 569,173 | | | 0 | | | 2,026 | | | (2,641) | | | 568,558 | |
| Other ABS | | 249,988 | | | 0 | | | 2,901 | | | (432) | | | 252,457 | |
| Foreign government and agency securities | | 5,100 | | | 0 | | | 338 | | | 0 | | | 5,438 | |
| Total securities available for sale, including loaned securities | | 5,426,787 | | | $ | (948) | | | $ | 347,760 | | | $ | (14,157) | | | 5,759,442 | |
Less: loaned securities (1) | | 33,164 | | | | | | | | | 36,102 | |
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | | $ | 5,393,623 | | | | | | | | | $ | 5,723,340 | |
(1)Included in Other assets in our consolidated balance sheet as further described below. See below for a discussion of our securities lending agreements.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 198,613 |
| | $ | 199,928 |
| | $ | 2,048 |
| | $ | 733 |
|
| State and municipal obligations | 112,003 |
| | 119,994 |
| | 8,032 |
| | 41 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | 2,136,819 |
| | 2,241,280 |
| | 106,189 |
| | 1,728 |
|
| RMBS | 766,429 |
| | 779,354 |
| | 14,452 |
| | 1,527 |
|
| CMBS | 593,647 |
| | 608,015 |
| | 14,993 |
| | 625 |
|
| Other ABS | 760,785 |
| | 759,129 |
| | 2,018 |
| | 3,674 |
|
| Foreign government and agency securities | 5,091 |
| | 5,224 |
| | 133 |
| | — |
|
| Total securities available for sale, including loaned securities | 4,573,387 |
| | 4,712,924 |
| | $ | 147,865 |
| | $ | 8,328 |
|
| Less: loaned securities | 23,853 |
| | 24,013 |
| | | | |
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | $ | 4,549,534 |
| | $ | 4,688,911 |
| | | | |
129
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | | Amortized
Cost | | | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | Fair Value |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | $ | 198,613 | | | | | $ | 2,048 | | | $ | (733) | | | $ | 199,928 | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 112,003 | | | | | 8,032 | | | (41) | | | 119,994 | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 2,136,819 | | | | | 106,189 | | | (1,728) | | | 2,241,280 | |
| RMBS | | 766,429 | | | | | 14,452 | | | (1,527) | | | 779,354 | |
| CMBS | | 574,037 | | | | | 14,993 | | | (610) | | | 588,420 | |
| CLO | | 465,449 | | | | | 229 | | | (3,117) | | | 462,561 | |
| Other ABS | | 314,946 | | | | | 1,789 | | | (572) | | | 316,163 | |
| Foreign government and agency securities | | 5,091 | | | | | 133 | | | 0 | | | 5,224 | |
| Total securities available for sale, including loaned securities | | 4,573,387 | | | | | $ | 147,865 | | | $ | (8,328) | | | 4,712,924 | |
Less: loaned securities (1) | | 23,853 | | | | | | | | | 24,013 | |
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | | $ | 4,549,534 | | | | | | | | | $ | 4,688,911 | |
(1)Included in Other assets in our consolidated balance sheet as further described below. See below for a discussion of our securities lending agreements.
The following table provides a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses on fixed-maturities available for sale, which relates entirely to corporate bonds and notes for the periods indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| (In thousands) | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 85,532 |
| | $ | 84,070 |
| | $ | 46 |
| | $ | 1,508 |
|
| State and municipal obligations | 138,022 |
| | 138,313 |
| | 2,191 |
| | 1,900 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | 2,288,720 |
| | 2,229,885 |
| | 5,053 |
| | 63,888 |
|
| RMBS | 334,843 |
| | 332,142 |
| | 1,785 |
| | 4,486 |
|
| CMBS | 546,729 |
| | 539,915 |
| | 544 |
| | 7,358 |
|
| Other ABS | 712,748 |
| | 704,662 |
| | 814 |
| | 8,900 |
|
| Total securities available for sale, including loaned securities | 4,106,594 |
| | 4,028,987 |
| | $ | 10,433 |
| | $ | 88,040 |
|
| Less: loaned securities | 7,632 |
| | 7,412 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | $ | 4,098,962 |
| | $ | 4,021,575 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | Year Ended
December 31, 2020 | | |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 0 | | | |
| Current provision for securities without prior allowance | | 1,254 | | | |
| Net increases (decreases) in allowance on previously impaired securities | | 0 | | | |
| Reduction for securities sold | | (306) | | | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 948 | | | |
Gross Unrealized Losses and Related Fair Values of Available for Sale Securities
For securities deemed “available for sale” and that are in an unrealized loss position and for which an allowance for credit loss has not been established, the following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair values, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of the dates indicated. Included in the amounts as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, are loaned securities under securities lending agreements that are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets, as further described below.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2020 |
| ($ in thousands) | | Less Than 12 Months | | 12 Months or Greater | | Total |
Description of
Securities | | # of
securities | | Fair
Value | | Unrealized
Losses | | # of
securities | | Fair
Value | | Unrealized
Losses | | # of
securities | | Fair
Value | | Unrealized
Losses |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | 4 | | | $ | 90,591 | | | $ | (3,611) | | | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | 4 | | | $ | 90,591 | | | $ | (3,611) | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 4 | | | 9,626 | | | (100) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 4 | | | 9,626 | | | (100) | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 60 | | | 174,848 | | | (3,758) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 60 | | | 174,848 | | | (3,758) | |
| RMBS | | 5 | | | 42,003 | | | (305) | | | 2 | | | 915 | | | (9) | | | 7 | | | 42,918 | | | (314) | |
| CMBS | | 43 | | | 118,345 | | | (3,035) | | | 6 | | | 8,312 | | | (266) | | | 49 | | | 126,657 | | | (3,301) | |
| CLO | | 52 | | | 173,459 | | | (970) | | | 25 | | | 137,506 | | | (1,671) | | | 77 | | | 310,965 | | | (2,641) | |
| Other ABS | | 26 | | | 70,759 | | | (322) | | | 3 | | | 12,119 | | | (110) | | | 29 | | | 82,878 | | | (432) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | 194 | | | $ | 679,631 | | | $ | (12,101) | | | 36 | | | $ | 158,852 | | | $ | (2,056) | | | 230 | | | $ | 838,483 | | | $ | (14,157) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| ($ in thousands) | | Less Than 12 Months | | 12 Months or Greater | | Total |
Description of
Securities | | # of
securities | | Fair
Value | | Unrealized
Losses | | # of
securities | | Fair
Value | | Unrealized
Losses | | # of
securities | | Fair
Value | | Unrealized
Losses |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | 2 | | | $ | 26,142 | | | $ | (731) | | | 2 | | | $ | 2,529 | | | $ | (2) | | | 4 | | | $ | 28,671 | | | $ | (733) | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 1 | | | 3,959 | | | (41) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 1 | | | 3,959 | | | (41) | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 25 | | | 110,871 | | | (1,728) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 25 | | | 110,871 | | | (1,728) | |
| RMBS | | 27 | | | 184,378 | | | (535) | | | 16 | | | 36,192 | | | (992) | | | 43 | | | 220,570 | | | (1,527) | |
| CMBS | | 33 | | | 89,994 | | | (463) | | | 8 | | | 6,346 | | | (147) | | | 41 | | | 96,340 | | | (610) | |
| CLO | | 34 | | | 170,806 | | | (327) | | | 36 | | | 184,483 | | | (2,790) | | | 70 | | | 355,289 | | | (3,117) | |
| Other ABS | | 32 | | | 74,733 | | | (358) | | | 8 | | | 25,178 | | | (214) | | | 40 | | | 99,911 | | | (572) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | 154 | | | $ | 660,883 | | | $ | (4,183) | | | 70 | | | $ | 254,728 | | | $ | (4,145) | | | 224 | | | $ | 915,611 | | | $ | (8,328) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2019 |
($ in thousands) Description of Securities | | Less Than 12 Months | | 12 Months or Greater | | Total |
| | # of securities | | Fair Value | | Unrealized Losses | | # of securities | | Fair Value | | Unrealized Losses | | # of securities | | Fair Value | | Unrealized Losses |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | 2 |
| | $ | 26,142 |
| | $ | 731 |
| | 2 |
| | $ | 2,529 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | 4 |
| | $ | 28,671 |
| | $ | 733 |
|
| State and municipal obligations | | 1 |
| | 3,959 |
| | 41 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 3,959 |
| | 41 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 25 |
| | 110,871 |
| | 1,728 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25 |
| | 110,871 |
| | 1,728 |
|
| RMBS | | 27 |
| | 184,378 |
| | 535 |
| | 16 |
| | 36,192 |
| | 992 |
| | 43 |
| | 220,570 |
| | 1,527 |
|
| CMBS | | 36 |
| | 109,589 |
| | 478 |
| | 8 |
| | 6,346 |
| | 147 |
| | 44 |
| | 115,935 |
| | 625 |
|
| Other ABS | | 63 |
| | 225,944 |
| | 670 |
| | 44 |
| | 209,661 |
| | 3,004 |
| | 107 |
| | 435,605 |
| | 3,674 |
|
| Total | | 154 |
| | $ | 660,883 |
| | $ | 4,183 |
| | 70 |
| | $ | 254,728 |
| | $ | 4,145 |
| | 224 |
| | $ | 915,611 |
| | $ | 8,328 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2018 |
($ in thousands)
Description of Securities | | Less Than 12 Months | | 12 Months or Greater | | Total |
| | # of securities | | Fair Value | | Unrealized Losses | | # of securities | | Fair Value | | Unrealized Losses | | # of securities | | Fair Value | | Unrealized Losses |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | 2 |
| | $ | 27,415 |
| | $ | 796 |
| | 8 |
| | $ | 23,476 |
| | $ | 712 |
| | 10 |
| | $ | 50,891 |
| | $ | 1,508 |
|
| State and municipal obligations | | 12 |
| | 41,263 |
| | 955 |
| | 16 |
| | 39,982 |
| | 945 |
| | 28 |
| | 81,245 |
| | 1,900 |
|
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 330 |
| | 1,208,430 |
| | 36,284 |
| | 126 |
| | 601,533 |
| | 27,604 |
| | 456 |
| | 1,809,963 |
| | 63,888 |
|
| RMBS | | 15 |
| | 92,315 |
| | 782 |
| | 28 |
| | 77,395 |
| | 3,704 |
| | 43 |
| | 169,710 |
| | 4,486 |
|
| CMBS | | 62 |
| | 328,696 |
| | 3,973 |
| | 33 |
| | 125,728 |
| | 3,385 |
| | 95 |
| | 454,424 |
| | 7,358 |
|
| Other ABS | | 129 |
| | 503,109 |
| | 7,917 |
| | 26 |
| | 89,628 |
| | 983 |
| | 155 |
| | 592,737 |
| | 8,900 |
|
| Total | | 550 |
| | $ | 2,201,228 |
| | $ | 50,707 |
| | 237 |
| | $ | 957,742 |
| | $ | 37,333 |
| | 787 |
| | $ | 3,158,970 |
| | $ | 88,040 |
|
Although we heldSee below for additional details on our net gains (losses) on investments, including the changes in the allowance for credit losses on fixed-maturities available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2019, we did not consider those securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. For all investment categories, the unrealized losses of 12 months or greater duration as of December 31, 2019 were generally caused by interest rate or credit spread movements since the purchase date, and as such, we expect to recover the amortized cost basis of these securities. As of December 31, 2019, we did not have the intent to sell any available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position, and we determined that it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity; therefore, we did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Activity. To the extent we determine that a security is deemed to have had an other-than-temporary impairment, an impairment loss is recognized. While there were 0 other-than-temporary impairment losses in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized such losses during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. There were 0 other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for any of those periods.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded other-than-temporary impairment losses in earnings of $1.7 millionimpairments due to our intent to sell certain securities. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded other-than-temporary impairment lossessecurities in earningsan unrealized loss position. See Note 2 for a discussion of $1.4 million, due primarily to credit deterioration in certain securities.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Securities Lending Agreements
During the third quarter of 2017, we commenced participationWe participate in a securities lending program whereby we loan certain securities in our investment portfolio to third parties, generally large banks, for short periods of time. These securities lending agreements are collateralized financing arrangements whereby we transfer securities to third parties through an intermediary in exchange for cash or other securities. However, pursuant to the terms of these agreements, we maintain effective control over all loaned securities. Although we report such securities at fair value within other assets in our consolidated balance sheets, rather than in investments, the detailed information provided in this Note includes these securities. See Note 9 for additional information.
Under our securities lending agreements, the borrower is required to provide to us collateral, consisting of cash or securities, in amounts generally equal to or exceeding: (i) 102% of the value of the loaned securities (105% in the case of foreign securities) or (ii) another agreed-upon percentage not less than 100% of the market value of the loaned securities. Any cash collateral we receive may be invested in liquid assets. Cash collateral, which is reinvested for our benefit by the intermediary in accordance with the investment guidelines contained in the securities lending and collateral agreements, is reflected in short-term investments, with an offsetting liability recognized in other liabilities for the obligation to return the cash collateral. Securities collateral we receive is held on deposit for the borrower’s benefit and we may not transfer or loan such securities collateral
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
unless the borrower is in default. Therefore, such securities collateral is not reflected in our consolidated financial statements given that the risks and rewards of ownership are not transferred to us from the borrowers.
Fees received and paid in connection with securities lending agreements are recorded in net investment income and interest expense, respectively, on the consolidated statements of operations.
All of our securities lending agreements are classified as overnight and revolving. Securities collateral on deposit with us from third-party borrowers totaling $42.4$43.3 million and $16.8$42.4 million as of December 31, 20192020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively, may not be transferred or re-pledged unless the third-party borrower is in default, and is therefore not reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
Net Investment Income
Net investment income consisted of:of the following.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Investment income: | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities | | $ | 148,127 | | | $ | 155,104 | | | $ | 141,552 | |
| Equity securities | | 6,378 | | | 7,028 | | | 7,157 | |
| Short-term investments | | 5,774 | | | 17,255 | | | 10,270 | |
| Other | | 354 | | | 545 | | | 976 | |
| Gross investment income | | 160,633 | | | 179,932 | | | 159,955 | |
| Investment expenses | | (6,596) | | | (8,136) | | | (7,480) | |
| Net investment income | | $ | 154,037 | | | $ | 171,796 | | | $ | 152,475 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Investment income: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities | $ | 155,104 |
| | $ | 141,552 |
| | $ | 122,890 |
|
| Equity securities | 7,028 |
| | 7,157 |
| | 4,318 |
|
| Short-term investments | 17,255 |
| | 10,270 |
| | 5,453 |
|
| Other | 545 |
| | 976 |
| | 987 |
|
| Gross investment income | 179,932 |
| | 159,955 |
| | 133,648 |
|
| Investment expenses | (8,136 | ) | | (7,480 | ) | | (6,400 | ) |
| Net investment income | $ | 171,796 |
| | $ | 152,475 |
| | $ | 127,248 |
|
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Net Gains (Losses) on Investments
Net gains (losses) on investments consisted of:of the following.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| Net realized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | |
Fixed-maturities available for sale (1) | $ | 11,262 |
| | $ | (11,256 | ) | | $ | (3,014 | ) |
| Trading securities | (303 | ) | | (1,840 | ) | | (5,995 | ) |
| Equity securities | (719 | ) | | 532 |
| | 368 |
|
| Other investments | 603 |
| | 470 |
| | 38 |
|
| Net realized gains (losses) on investments | 10,843 |
| | (12,094 | ) | | (8,603 | ) |
| Other-than-temporary impairment losses | — |
| | (1,744 | ) | | (1,420 | ) |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments (2) | 33,220 |
| | (27,287 | ) | | 13,230 |
|
| Total net gains (losses) on investments | $ | 44,063 |
| | $ | (41,125 | ) | | $ | 3,207 |
|
______________________ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2018 | |
| Net realized gains (losses): | | | | | | | |
Fixed-maturities available for sale (1) | | $ | 34,869 | | | $ | 11,262 | | | $ | (11,256) | | |
| Trading securities | | 4 | | | (303) | | | (1,840) | | |
| Equity securities | | 353 | | | (719) | | | 532 | | |
| Other investments | | 600 | | | 603 | | | 470 | | |
| Net realized gains (losses) on investments | | 35,826 | | | 10,843 | | | (12,094) | | |
| Impairment losses due to intent to sell | | (1,401) | | | 0 | | | (1,744) | | |
| Net decrease (increase) in expected credit losses | | (1,254) | | | 0 | | | 0 | | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | | 10,960 | | | 33,220 | | | (27,287) | | |
| Total net gains (losses) on investments | | $ | 44,131 | | | $ | 44,063 | | | $ | (41,125) | | |
(1)Components of net realized gains (losses) on fixed-maturities available for sale include:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Gross investment gains from sales and redemptions | $ | 17,663 |
| | $ | 1,986 |
| | $ | 6,052 |
| Gross investment gains from sales and redemptions | | $ | 37,431 | | | $ | 17,663 | | | $ | 1,986 | |
| Gross investment losses from sales and redemptions | (6,401 | ) | | (13,242 | ) | | (9,066 | ) | Gross investment losses from sales and redemptions | | (2,562) | | | (6,401) | | | (13,242) | |
| |
(2) | These amounts include unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities other than securities available for sale. For 2017, the unrealized gains (losses) on investments exclude the net change in unrealized gains and losses on equity securities. Prior to the implementation of the update to the standard for the accounting of financial instruments effective January 1, 2018, the unrealized gains (losses) associated with equity securities were classified in accumulated other comprehensive income. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The net changes in unrealized gains (losses) recognized in earnings on investments that were still held at each period-end were as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments still held: | | | | | | |
| Trading securities | | $ | 10,583 | | | $ | 16,346 | | | $ | (16,281) | |
| Equity securities | | 1,759 | | | 11,906 | | | (8,886) | |
| Other investments | | 248 | | | (174) | | | 447 | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments still held | | $ | 12,590 | | | $ | 28,078 | | | $ | (24,720) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments still held: | | | | | |
| Trading securities | $ | 16,346 |
| | $ | (16,281 | ) | | $ | 8,945 |
|
Equity securities (1) | 11,906 |
| | (8,886 | ) | | — |
|
| Other investments | (174 | ) | | 447 |
| | (118 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments still held | $ | 28,078 |
| | $ | (24,720 | ) | | $ | 8,827 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Prior to the implementation of the update to the standard for the accounting of financial instruments effective January 1, 2018, the unrealized gains (losses) associated with equity securities were classified in accumulated other comprehensive income. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The change in unrealized gains (losses) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Fixed-maturities: | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax | $ | 180,441 |
| | $ | (97,356 | ) | | $ | 32,147 |
|
| Less reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (loss), net of tax | 8,897 |
| | (10,270 | ) | | (2,556 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax | $ | 171,544 |
| | $ | (87,086 | ) | | $ | 34,703 |
|
| | | | | | |
Equities (1): | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (244 | ) |
| Less reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (loss), net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | (86 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (158 | ) |
______________________
| |
(1) | Prior to our implementation of the update to the standard for the accounting of financial instruments effective January 1, 2018, the unrealized losses associated with equity securities were classified in accumulated other comprehensive income. Effective January 1, 2018, we measure our equity investments at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. |
Contractual Maturities
The contractual maturities of fixed-maturities available for sale were as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2020 |
| (In thousands) | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value |
| Due in one year or less | | $ | 125,361 | | | $ | 126,414 | |
Due after one year through five years (1) | | 1,002,786 | | | 1,062,579 | |
Due after five years through 10 years (1) | | 1,225,712 | | | 1,338,147 | |
Due after 10 years (1) | | 808,882 | | | 896,083 | |
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities (2) | | 2,264,046 | | | 2,336,219 | |
| Total | | 5,426,787 | | | 5,759,442 | |
| Less: loaned securities | | 33,164 | | | 36,102 | |
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | | $ | 5,393,623 | | | $ | 5,723,340 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | Amortized
Cost | | Fair
Value |
| Due in one year or less | $ | 146,985 |
| | $ | 147,541 |
|
Due after one year through five years (1) | 834,096 |
| | 852,660 |
|
Due after five years through 10 years (1) | 1,062,725 |
| | 1,121,536 |
|
Due after 10 years (1) | 408,720 |
| | 444,689 |
|
RMBS (2) | 766,429 |
| | 779,354 |
|
CMBS (2) | 593,647 |
| | 608,015 |
|
Other ABS (2) | 760,785 |
| | 759,129 |
|
| Total | 4,573,387 |
| | 4,712,924 |
|
| Less: loaned securities | 23,853 |
| | 24,013 |
|
| Total fixed-maturities available for sale | $ | 4,549,534 |
| | $ | 4,688,911 |
|
______________________(2)Includes RMBS, CMBS, CLO and Other ABS, which are not due at a single maturity date.
| |
(1) | Actual maturities may differ as a result of calls before scheduled maturity. |
| |
(2) | RMBS, CMBS, and Other ABS are shown separately, as they are not due at a single maturity date. |
Other
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, we did not transfer any securities to or from the available for sale or trading categories.
Our fixed-maturities available for sale include securities totaling $16.8$16.9 million and $17.6$16.8 million at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively, on deposit and serving as collateral with various state regulatory authorities. Our fixed-maturities available for sale also include securities serving as collateral for our FHLB advances. See Note 12 for additional information about our FHLB advances.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
7. Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets, Net
All of our goodwill and other acquired intangible assets relate to our ServicesReal Estate segment. The purchase price allocation for the acquisition of Five Bridges in December 2018 was finalized in the first quarter of 2019. In comparison to the preliminary fair value amounts recorded as of December 31, 2018, the final calculations resulted in an increase in goodwill of $0.5 million and a decrease in other acquired intangible assets of $0.5 million.
The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as of and for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018:2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | Goodwill | | Accumulated Impairment Losses | | Net |
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | | $ | 200,561 | | | $ | (186,469) | | | $ | 14,092 | |
| Goodwill acquired | | 538 | | | — | | | 538 | |
| Impairment losses | | — | | | (4,828) | | | (4,828) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | | 201,099 | | | (191,297) | | | 9,802 | |
| | | | | | |
Goodwill disposed (1) | | (191,297) | | | 191,297 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | | $ | 9,802 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 9,802 | |
(1)Related to the sale of Clayton in January 2020.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | Goodwill | | Accumulated Impairment Losses | | Net |
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 197,391 |
| | $ | (186,469 | ) | | $ | 10,922 |
|
| Goodwill acquired | 3,170 |
| | — |
| | 3,170 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | 200,561 |
| | (186,469 | ) | | 14,092 |
|
| Goodwill acquired | 538 |
| | — |
| | 538 |
|
| Impairment losses | — |
| | (4,828 | ) | | (4,828 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | 201,099 |
| | $ | (191,297 | ) | | $ | 9,802 |
|
133
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The following is a summary of the gross and net carrying amounts and accumulated amortization (including impairment) of our other acquired intangible assets as of the periods indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
| Client relationships | | $ | 43,550 | | | $ | (31,559) | | | $ | 11,991 | | | $ | 43,550 | | | $ | (27,269) | | | $ | 16,281 | |
| Technology | | 8,285 | | | (7,370) | | | 915 | | | 8,435 | | | (6,789) | | | 1,646 | |
| Licenses | | 463 | | | (128) | | | 335 | | | 463 | | | (81) | | | 382 | |
| Trade names and trademarks | | 480 | | | (480) | | | 0 | | | 480 | | | (404) | | | 76 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 52,778 | | | $ | (39,537) | | | $ | 13,241 | | | $ | 52,928 | | | $ | (34,543) | | | $ | 18,385 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 (1) |
| (In thousands) | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
| Client relationships | $ | 43,550 |
| | $ | (27,269 | ) | | $ | 16,281 |
|
| Technology | 8,435 |
| | (6,789 | ) | | 1,646 |
|
| Trade name and trademarks | 480 |
| | (404 | ) | | 76 |
|
| Licenses | 463 |
| | (81 | ) | | 382 |
|
| Total | $ | 52,928 |
| | $ | (34,543 | ) | | $ | 18,385 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| (In thousands) | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
| Client relationships | $ | 84,000 |
| | $ | (48,227 | ) | | $ | 35,773 |
|
| Technology | 17,362 |
| | (13,141 | ) | | 4,221 |
|
| Trade name and trademarks | 8,340 |
| | (3,864 | ) | | 4,476 |
|
| Non-competition agreements | 185 |
| | (177 | ) | | 8 |
|
| Licenses | 463 |
| | (35 | ) | | 428 |
|
| Total | $ | 110,350 |
| | $ | (65,444 | ) | (2) | $ | 44,906 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Excludes total gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization (including impairment) related to Clayton of $60.9 million and $57.2 million, respectively, which were reclassified to assets held-for-sale and included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2019. |
| |
(2) | Includes accumulated impairment charges of $15.8 million as of December 31, 2018, which were related entirely to Clayton. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, amortization expense (including impairment) was $5.1 million, $8.6 million $12.4 million and $11.8$12.4 million, respectively. The estimated aggregateamortization expense for 20202021 and thereafter is as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | Estimated Amortization Expense |
| 2021 | | $ | 3,450 | |
| 2022 | | 3,397 | |
| 2023 | | 3,361 | |
| 2024 | | 3,033 | |
| | |
| Thereafter | | 0 | |
| Total | | $ | 13,241 | |
|
| | | |
| (In thousands) | |
| 2020 | $ | 3,880 |
|
| 2021 | 3,516 |
|
| 2022 | 3,463 |
|
| 2023 | 3,428 |
|
| 2024 | 3,343 |
|
| Thereafter | 755 |
|
| Total | $ | 18,385 |
|
Impairment Analysis
2019 Activity
As described below, in 2017, we undertook a strategic reviewpart of our Services2020 annual goodwill impairment assessment performed during the fourth quarter, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit using primarily an income approach. The key factor in our fair value analysis was forecasted future cash flows. We considered both positive and negative factors and concluded that, after considering all of the factors and evidence available, there was 0 impairment of goodwill indicated as of the measurement date because the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeded our carrying amount.
Based primarily on the wind down of the traditional appraisal business, as of December 31, 2020, we also evaluated the recoverability of certain asset groups in the fourth quarter, including other acquired intangible assets. Based on our analysis, we recognized an impairment of client relationships of $1.0 millionand made several decisions with respect totechnology of $0.3 million as of December 31, 2020. There was 0 impairment indicated for the business strategy that were designed to reposition this business to drive future growth and profitability. As a further step in this strategic repositioning,remaining other acquired intangible assets.
Clayton Sale
In January 2020, we initiated a process in 2019 to evaluate a potentialcompleted the sale of Clayton, through which we provided mortgage services related to loan acquisition, RMBS securitization and distressed asset reviews and servicer and loan surveillance services. This sale was completed in January 2020.
We report an asset group as held for sale when: (i) management is committed to a formal plan to sell the assets; (ii) the asset group is available for immediate sale; (iii) it is being actively marketed at a price that is reasonable in relation to its fair value; (iv) there is an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset have been initiated; (v) the sale is probable and expected to be completed within one year; and (vi) it is deemed unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Based on developments in the fourth quarter of 2019, we determined that the asset group associated with the sale of Clayton met the criteria to be reclassified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019.
An asset group classified as held for sale is reflected at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell. If the carrying amount of the business exceeds its estimated fair value, a loss is recognized. Due to the reclassification as held for sale of the asset group associated with the sale of Clayton, we2019 and recognized an impairmentimpairment charge of $4.8 million for goodwill allocated to this asset group. The allocation was based on the estimated relative indicated fair value of the Clayton asset group and the remaining Services reporting unit. In addition, we recognized an impairment of other acquired intangible assets for $13.7 million and reclassified the remaining other acquired intangible assets balance associated with the asset group of $3.7 million as held for sale as of December 31, 2019.
Assets and liabilities related to Clayton classified as held for sale are presented in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets in the period in which the business iswas classified as held for sale. See Notes 4 and 9 for additional detail on assets held for sale as of December 31, 2019.
We generally perform our annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of each year, using balances as of the prior quarter. Following the reclassification to held for sale of allocated goodwill and other acquired intangible assets and the related impairment recognized, we elected to perform a qualitative impairment analysis for the remaining goodwill and other acquired intangible assets in the fourth quarter of 2019. The qualitative analysis requires us to assess all relevant events and circumstances that could affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. We considered factors such as: (i) our recent impairment of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets related to the sale of Clayton and (ii) the increase in and timing of revenues during the third and fourth quarters of 2019 for the remaining reporting unit (as compared to the forecasted amounts for the same periods), including the impact of higher margin business. Based on our qualitative assessment in the fourth quarter of 2019, we concluded that it is not “more likely than not” that the fair value of the remaining Services reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as of December 31, 2019. In addition, based on our analysis, there was 0 impairment indicated for the remaining other acquired intangible assets, as the carrying amounts were estimated to be recoverable from future cash flows.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2018 Activity
As part of our annual goodwill impairment assessment in 2018, which was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2018, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit using primarily an income approach and, to a lesser extent, a market approach. The key factor in our fair value analysis was forecasted future cash flows. We considered both positive and negative factors and concluded that, after considering all of the factors and evidence available, there was 0 impairment of goodwill as of December 31, 2018 because the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeded our carrying amount.
As of December 31, 2018, we also evaluated the recoverability of our other acquired intangible assets. Factors affecting the estimated fair value of our goodwill were also considered in estimating the recoverability of our other acquired intangible assets. Based on our analysis, there was 0 impairment indicated for other acquired intangible assets, as the carrying amounts were estimated to be recoverable from future cash flows.
2017 Activity
Our Chief Executive Officer joined Radian in March 2017 and initiated a review to evaluate the strategic direction of the Services segment. Based on this strategic review, in the second quarter of 2017, we made several decisions with respect to business strategy for the segment in order to reposition the Services business to drive future growth and profitability. We determined to: (i) discontinue certain initiatives and (ii) shift the strategy of the Services segment to focus on core products and services that were expected to have higher growth potential, to produce more predictable, recurring revenue streams over time and to better align with our market expertise and the needs of our customers.
During the second quarter of 2017, the Services segment performed below forecasted levels. The anticipated business and growth opportunities for certain business lines in our Services segment had been impacted by: (i) market demand, which was lower than anticipated; (ii) increased competition, including with respect to product alternatives and pricing; and (iii) delays in the realization of efficiencies and margin improvements associated with certain technology initiatives. The impact of the observed market trends, which we expected to continue, together with our strategic decisions in 2017 discussed above, resulted in changes to our expected product mix and the expected growth rates associated with various initiatives, which in turn generated material reductions to our forecasted net cash flows. As a result of the quantitative goodwill analysis, we recorded an impairment charge of $184.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, to reduce the carrying amount of the Services segment to its estimated fair value. Prior to finalizing this amount, we also evaluated the recoverability of the segment’s other acquired intangible assets and recorded impairment charges of $15.8 million related to the Services segment’s other acquired intangible assets.
During the fourth quarter of 2017, we elected to perform a qualitative annual goodwill impairment analysis, which requires us to assess all relevant events and circumstances that could affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. We considered factors such as: (i) the increase in and timing of revenues during the third and fourth quarters of 2017 (as compared to the forecasted amounts for the same periods); (ii) the impact to projected cash flows, a significant input used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit, associated with the TCJA enacted in the fourth quarter of 2017; (iii) our recent interim goodwill impairment test and recognition of impairment charges; and (iv) the January 2020 sale of a business line. Based on our qualitative assessment in the fourth quarter of 2017, we concluded that it was not “more likely than not” that the fair value of the Services reporting unit was less than its carrying amount as of December 31, 2017.
For additional information on our accounting policies for goodwill and other acquired intangible assets, see Note 2.
8. Reinsurance
In our mortgage insurance and title insurance businesses, we use reinsurance as part of our risk distribution strategy, including to manage our capital position and risk profile. The reinsurance arrangements for our mortgage insurance business include premiums ceded under the QSR Program, the Single Premium QSR Program, and the Excess-of-Loss Program. The Company’s related PMIERs credit under these programs are subject to GSE approval.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The effect of all of our reinsurance programs on our net income is as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net premiums written: | | | | | | |
| Direct | | $ | 1,108,513 | | | $ | 1,132,338 | | | $ | 1,089,720 | |
Assumed (1) | | 12,197 | | | 10,379 | | | 6,901 | |
Ceded (2) | | (87,201) | | | (56,132) | | | (98,314) | |
| Net premiums written | | $ | 1,033,509 | | | $ | 1,086,585 | | | $ | 998,307 | |
| Net premiums earned: | | | | | | |
| Direct | | $ | 1,286,527 | | | $ | 1,244,870 | | (3) | $ | 1,074,298 | |
Assumed (1) | | 12,213 | | | 10,382 | | | 6,904 | |
Ceded (2) | | (183,419) | | | (109,903) | | (3) | (67,195) | |
| Net premiums earned | | $ | 1,115,321 | | | $ | 1,145,349 | | (3) | $ | 1,014,007 | |
| | | | | | | |
Ceding commissions earned (4) | | $ | 53,654 | | | $ | 48,659 | | (3) | $ | 33,446 | |
| Ceded losses | | 58,266 | | | 5,859 | | | 5,086 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net premiums written—insurance: | | | | | |
| Direct | $ | 1,132,338 |
| | $ | 1,089,720 |
| | $ | 1,032,735 |
|
| Assumed | 10,379 |
| (1) | 6,901 |
| (1) | 25 |
|
Ceded (2) | (56,132 | ) | | (98,314 | ) | | (214,343 | ) |
| Net premiums written—insurance | $ | 1,086,585 |
| | $ | 998,307 |
| | $ | 818,417 |
|
| Net premiums earned—insurance: | | | | | |
| Direct | $ | 1,244,870 |
| | $ | 1,074,298 |
|
| $ | 990,016 |
|
| Assumed | 10,382 |
| (1) | 6,904 |
| (1) | 28 |
|
Ceded (2) | (109,903 | ) | | (67,195 | ) | | (57,271 | ) |
| Net premiums earned—insurance | $ | 1,145,349 |
| | $ | 1,014,007 |
| | $ | 932,773 |
|
| | | | | | |
Ceding commissions earned (3) | $ | 48,659 |
| | $ | 33,446 |
| | $ | 26,896 |
|
| Ceded losses | 5,859 |
| | 5,086 |
| | 3,261 |
|
______________________(2)Net of profit commission, which is impacted by the level of ceded losses recoverable, if any, on reinsurance transactions. See Note 11 for additional information on our reserve for losses and reinsurance recoverables.
| |
(1) | Includes premiums earned from our participation in certain credit risk transfer programs.(3)Includes a cumulative adjustment to unearned premiums recorded in the second quarter of 2019 related to an update to the amortization rates used to recognize revenue for Single Premium Policies. See Note 4 for further information. (4) |
| |
(2) | Net of profit commission. |
| |
(3) | Deferred ceding commissions of $52.5 million and $74.8 million and $91.4 million are included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
QSR Program
In 2012, Radian Guaranty entered into the QSR Program with a third-party reinsurance provider. Radian Guaranty has ceded the maximum amount permitted under the QSR Program and is no longer ceding NIW under this program. RIF ceded under the QSR Program was $0.6 billion, $0.9 billion and $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Single Premium QSR Program
2016 Single Premium QSR Agreement. In 2016, Radian Guaranty entered into each of the 2016 Single Premium QSR Agreement, with a panel of third-party reinsurers. Under the 20162018 Single Premium QSR Agreement effective January 1, 2016, Radian Guaranty began ceding the followingand 2020 Single Premium IIF andQSR Agreement with panels of third-party reinsurers to cede a contractual quota share percent of our Single Premium NIW as of the effective date of each agreement (as set forth in the table below), subject to certain conditions:
20% of its existing performing Single Premium Policies written between January 1, 2012 and March 31, 2013;
35% of its existing performing Single Premium Policies written between April 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015; and
35% of its Single Premium NIW from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017.
conditions. Radian Guaranty receivedreceives a 25% ceding commission for ceded premiums written pursuant to this transaction.these transactions. Radian Guaranty also receives a profit commission annually, provided that the loss ratio on the loans covered under the agreement generally remains below 55%.the applicable prescribed thresholds. Losses on the ceded risk aboveup to this level reduce Radian Guaranty’s profit commission on a dollar-for-dollar basis.
The agreementEach of the agreements is subject to a scheduled to terminate on December 31, 2027.termination date as set forth in the table below; however, Radian Guaranty has the option, based on certain conditions and subject to a termination fee, to terminate any of the agreementagreements at the end of any calendar quarter on or after January 1, 2020.the applicable optional termination date. If Radian Guaranty exercises this option in the future, it would result in Radian Guaranty reassuming the related RIF in exchange for a net payment to the reinsurer calculated in accordance with the terms of the applicable agreement. Radian Guaranty also may terminate this agreementany of the agreements prior to the applicable scheduled termination date under certain circumstances/conditions,circumstances, including if 1one or both of the GSEs no longer grant full PMIERs creditcapital relief for the reinsurance.
The 2020 Single Premium QSR Agreement is the only QSR agreement under which Radian Guaranty is currently ceding NIW. Under the 2020 Single Premium QSR Agreement, NIW for policies issued between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 is being ceded, subject to certain conditions and a limitation on ceded premiums written of $250 million. The parties may
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
mutually agree to increase the amount of ceded risk above this level. The following table sets forth additional details regarding the Single Premium QSR Program.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 Singles QSR | | 2018 Singles QSR | | 2016 Singles QSR |
| | | | | | |
| NIW Policy Dates | | Jan 1, 2020-Dec 31, 2021 | | Jan 1, 2018-Dec 31, 2019 | | Jan 1, 2012-Dec 31, 2017 |
| Effective Date | | January 1, 2020 | | January 1, 2018 | | January 1, 2016 |
| Scheduled Termination Date | | December 31, 2031 | | December 31, 2029 | | December 31, 2027 |
| Optional Termination Date | | January 1, 2024 | | January 1, 2022 | | January 1, 2020 |
| Quota Share % | | 65% | | 65% | | 20% - 65% (1) |
| Ceding Commission % | | 25% | | 25% | | 25% |
| Profit Commission % | | Up to 56% | | Up to 56% | | Up to 55% |
| | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | | As of December 31, 2020 |
| RIF Ceded | | $ | 1,597 | | | $ | 1,979 | | | $ | 3,071 | |
| | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | | As of December 31, 2019 |
| RIF Ceded | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3,231 | | | $ | 5,351 | |
(1)Effective December 31, 2017, we amended the 2016 Single Premium QSR Agreement to increase the amount of ceded risk on performing loans under the agreement from 35% to 65% for the 2015 through 2017 vintages. As ofLoans included in the effective date, the result of this amendment increased the amount of risk ceded on Single Premium Policies, including for the purposes of calculating2012 through 2014 vintages, and any future ceding commissions and profit commissions that Radian Guaranty will earn. It also increased the future
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
amounts of our ceded premiums and ceded losses. RIF ceded under the 2016 Single Premium QSR Agreement was $5.4 billion as of December 31, 2019, compared to $6.3 billion and $6.9 billion as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of January 1, 2018, Radian Guaranty is no longer ceding NIW under this arrangement.
2018 Single Premium QSR Agreement. In October 2017, we entered into the 2018 Single Premium QSR Agreement with a panel of third-party reinsurers. Under the 2018 Single Premium QSR Agreement, we ceded 65% of our Single Premium NIW beginning with the business written in January 2018, subject to certain conditions.
Radian Guaranty received a 25% ceding commission for ceded premiums written pursuant to this transaction. Radian Guaranty also receives an annual profit commission based on the performance of theother loans subject to the agreement provided that the loss ratio on the subject loans is below 56% for that calendar year.
The agreement is scheduled to terminate on December 31, 2029. Radian Guaranty has the option, based on certain conditions and subject to a termination fee, to terminate the agreement as of January 1, 2022, orwere delinquent at the end of any calendar quarter thereafter, which would result in Radian Guaranty reassuming the related RIF in exchange for a net payment to the reinsurer calculated in accordance with the termstime of the agreement. Radian Guaranty also may terminate this agreement prior toamendment, were unaffected by the scheduled termination date under certain circumstances/conditions, including if 1 or both of the GSEs no longer grant full PMIERs credit for the reinsurance. RIF ceded under the 2018 Single Premium QSR Agreement was $3.2 billion as of December 31, 2019, compared to $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2018. As of January 1, 2020, Radian Guaranty is no longer ceding NIW under this arrangement.
2020 Single Premium QSR Agreement. In January 2020, we entered into the 2020 Single Premium QSR Agreement with a panel of third-party reinsurers. Under the 2020 Single Premium QSR Agreement, beginning with the business written in January 2020, we expect to cede 65% of our Single Premium NIW, subject to certain conditionschange and a limitation on ceded premiums written equal to $250 million for policies issued between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. The parties may mutually agree to increasetherefore the amount of ceded risk above this level.
Radian Guaranty will receive a 25% ceding commission for ceded premiums written pursuantthose loans continues to this transaction. Radian Guaranty will also receive an annual profit commission based on the performance of the loans subjectrange from 20% to the agreement, provided that the loss ratio on the subject loans is below 56% for that calendar year. Radian Guaranty may discontinue ceding new policies under the agreement at the end of any calendar quarter.
The agreement is scheduled to terminate on December 31, 2031. Radian Guaranty has the option, based on certain conditions and subject to a termination fee, to terminate the agreement as of January 1, 2024, or at the end of any calendar quarter thereafter, which would result in Radian Guaranty reassuming the related RIF in exchange for a net payment to the reinsurer calculated in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Radian Guaranty also may terminate this agreement prior to the scheduled termination date under certain circumstances/conditions, including if 1 or both of the GSEs no longer grant full PMIERs credit for the reinsurance.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Excess-of-Loss Program
Through December 31, 2019, Radian Guaranty has entered into 24 fully collateralized reinsurance arrangements with the Eagle Re Issuers. For the respective coverage periods, Radian Guaranty will retainretains the first-loss layer of aggregate losses, as well as any losses in excess of the outstanding reinsurance coverage amounts. The Eagle Re Issuers will provide the second layer coverage up to the outstanding coverage amounts. For each of these 4 reinsurance arrangements, the Eagle Re Issuers financed their coverage by issuing mortgage insurance-linked notes to eligible third-party capital markets investors in unregistered private offerings. The aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance coverage for these transactions decreases over a ten-year10-year period as the principal balances of the underlying covered mortgages decrease and as any claims are paid by the applicable Eagle Re Issuer or the mortgage insurance is canceled. TheRadian Guaranty has rights to terminate the reinsurance agreements upon the occurrence of certain events.
In each of the insurance-linked notes transactions, the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount will begin amortizing after an initial period in which a target level of credit enhancement is obtained and will stop amortizing if certain thresholds, or triggers, are reached, such as if the reinsured mortgages were to experienceincluding a trigger based on an elevated level of delinquencies or certain credit enhancement tests were not maintained. Radian Guaranty has rights to terminateas defined in the reinsurance agreements uponinsurance-linked notes transaction agreements. With the occurrenceexception of certain events. Thethe most recent transaction, Eagle Re 2020-2 Ltd., the insurance-linked notes issued by the Eagle Re Issuers financed theirin connection with our Excess-of-Loss Program are currently subject to a delinquency trigger event, which was reported to the insurance-linked note investors on June 25, 2020. Both the amortization of the outstanding reinsurance coverage by issuing mortgageamount pursuant to our reinsurance arrangements with the Eagle Re Issuers and the amortization of the principal amount of the related insurance-linked notes issued by the Eagle Re Issuers have been suspended and will continue to eligible third-party capital markets investors in an unregistered private offering.be suspended during the pendency of the trigger event.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Eagle Re 2019-1 (Issued April 2019) |
(In millions)
| | | | | | | As of December 31, 2019 |
| Policy In-force Dates | Initial RIF | | Initial Coverage | | First Layer Retention | | RIF | | Remaining Coverage | | First Layer Retention |
| Jan 1, 2018-Dec 31, 2018 | $ | 10,705 |
| | $ | 562 |
| | $ | 268 |
| | $ | 8,409 |
| | $ | 487 |
| | $ | 267 |
|
136
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Eagle Re 2018-1 (Issued November 2018) |
(In millions)
| | | | | | | As of December 31, 2019 |
| Policy In-force Dates | Initial RIF | | Initial Coverage (1) | | First Layer Retention | | RIF | | Remaining Coverage (1) | | First Layer Retention |
| Jan 1, 2017-Dec 31, 2017 | $ | 9,109 |
| | $ | 434 |
| | $ | 205 |
| | $ | 7,026 |
| | $ | 343 |
| | $ | 204 |
|
______________________Radian Group Inc.
| |
(1) | Excludes a separate excess-of-loss reinsurance agreement entered into by Radian Guaranty that initially provided up to $21.4 million of coverage. |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The following table sets forth additional details regarding the Excess-of-Loss Program.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | | Eagle Re 2020-2 Ltd. | | Eagle Re 2020-1 Ltd. | | Eagle Re 2019-1 Ltd. | | Eagle Re 2018-1 Ltd. |
| Issued | | October 2020 | | February 2020 | | April 2019 | | November 2018 | |
| NIW Policy Dates | | Oct 1, 2019-
Jul 31, 2020 | | Jan 1, 2019-
Sep 30, 2019 | | Jan 1, 2018-
Dec 31, 2018 | | Jan 1, 2017-
Dec 31, 2017 | |
| Initial RIF | | $ | 13,011 | | | | $ | 9,866 | | | | $ | 10,705 | | | | $ | 9,109 | | | |
| Initial Coverage | | 390 | | | | 488 | | | | 562 | | | | 434 | | (1) | |
| Initial First Layer Retention | | 423 | | | | 202 | | | | 268 | | | | 205 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | | As of December 31, 2020 |
| RIF | | $ | 11,748 | | | | $ | 6,121 | | | | $ | 4,657 | | | | $ | 3,986 | | | |
| Remaining Coverage | | 390 | | | | 488 | | | | 385 | | | | 276 | | (1) | |
| First Layer Retention | | 423 | | | | 202 | | | | 265 | | | | 201 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | | As of December 31, 2019 |
| RIF | | $ | 0 | | | | $ | 0 | | | | $ | 8,409 | | | | $ | 7,026 | | | |
| Remaining Coverage | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 487 | | | | 343 | | (1) | |
| First Layer Retention | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 267 | | | | 204 | | | |
(1)Excludes a separate excess-of-loss reinsurance agreement entered into by Radian Guaranty with both initial and remaining coverage of $21.4 million.
The Eagle Re Issuers are not subsidiaries or affiliates of Radian Guaranty. Based on the accounting guidance that addresses VIEs, we have not consolidated any of the Eagle Re Issuers in our consolidated financial statements, because Radian does not have: (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the Eagle Re Issuers’ economic performances or (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the Eagle Re Issuers that potentially could be significant to the Eagle Re Issuers. See Note 2 for more information on our accounting treatment of VIEs.
The reinsurance premium due to the Eagle Re Issuers is calculated by multiplying the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount at the beginning of a period by a coupon rate, which is the sum of one-month LIBOR, or acceptable alternative to LIBOR, plus a contractual risk margin, and then subtracting actual investment income collected on the assets in the reinsurance trust during the preceding month. As a result, the premiums we pay will vary based on: (i) the spread between LIBOR and the rates on the investments held by the reinsurance trust and (ii) the outstanding amount of reinsurance coverage. As the reinsurance premium will vary based on changes in these rates, we concluded that the reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives, which we have accounted for separately as freestanding derivatives and recorded in other assets or other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 25 for moreadditional information on our accounting treatment of VIEs.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, our maximum exposure to loss associated with our Eagle Re Issuers was $0.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, which represents the fair value of the embedded derivatives.
In the event the VIEan Eagle Re Issuer is unable to meet its future obligations to us, if any, our insurance subsidiaries would be liable to make claims payments to our policyholders. In the event that all of the assets in the reinsurance trust (consisting of U.S. government money market funds, cash or U.S. Treasury securities) have become worthless and the VIEEagle Re Issuer is unable to make its payments to us, our maximum potential loss would be the amount of mortgage insurance claim payments for losses on the insured policies, net of the aggregate reinsurance payments already received, up to the full aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance coverage amount. In the same scenario, the related embedded derivative would no longer have value.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The Eagle Re Issuers represent our only VIEs as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The following table presents the total assets and liabilities of the Eagle Re Issuers as of the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total VIE Assets and Liabilities (1) |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Eagle Re 2020-2 Ltd. | | $ | 390,324 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Eagle Re 2020-1 Ltd. | | 488,385 | | | 0 | |
| Eagle Re 2019-1 Ltd. | | 384,602 | | | 508,449 | |
| Eagle Re 2018-1 Ltd. | | 275,718 | | | 357,005 | |
| Total | | $ | 1,539,029 | | | $ | 865,454 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Total VIE Assets and Liabilities (1) |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Eagle Re 2018-1 | $ | 357,005 |
| | $ | 434,034 |
|
| Eagle Re 2019-1 | 508,449 |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 865,454 |
| | $ | 434,034 |
|
______________________QSR Program
| |
(1) | Assets held by the Eagle Re Issuers are required to be invested in U.S. government money market funds, cash or U.S. Treasury securities. Liabilities of Eagle Re Issuers consist of their mortgage insurance-linked notes, as described above. |
In February 2020,2012, Radian Guaranty entered into the QSR Program with a fully collateralizedthird-party reinsurance agreement with Eagle Re 2020-1. Eagle Re 2020-1 is a VIEprovider. Radian Guaranty has ceded the maximum amount permitted under the QSR Program and is not a subsidiary or affiliateno longer ceding NIW under this program. RIF ceded under the QSR Program was $381.8 million and $644.5 million as of Radian Guaranty. This reinsurance agreement provides for up to $488.4 million of aggregate excess-of-loss reinsurance coverage for the mortgage insurance losses on new defaults on an existing portfolio of eligible Recurring Premium Policies with RIF of $9.9 billion that were issued between January 1,December 31, 2020 and 2019, and September 30, 2019. Eagle Re 2020-1 financed its coverage by issuing mortgage insurance-linked notes in an aggregate amount of $488.4 million to eligible third-party capital markets investors in an unregistered private offering.respectively.
Other Collateral
Although we use reinsurance as one of our risk management tools, reinsurance does not relieve us of our obligations to our policyholders. In the event the reinsurers are unable to meet their obligations to us, our insurance subsidiaries would be liable for any defaulted amounts. However, consistent with the PMIERs reinsurer counterparty collateral requirements, Radian Guaranty’s reinsurers have established trusts to help secure our potential cash recoveries. In addition to the total VIE assets of the Eagle Re Issuers discussed above, the amount held in reinsurance trusts was $228.6 million as of December 31, 2020, compared to $203.2 million as of December 31, 2019, compared to $212.2 million as of December 31, 2018.2019. In addition, for the Single Premium QSR Program, Radian Guaranty holds amounts received from ceded premiums written to collateralize the reinsurers’ obligations, which is reported in reinsurance funds withheld on our consolidated balance sheets. Any loss recoveries and profit commissions paid to Radian Guaranty related to the Single Premium QSR Program are expected to be realized from this account.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
9. Other Assets
The following table shows the components of other assets for the periods indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Prepaid federal income taxes (Note 10) | | $ | 210,889 | | | $ | 134,800 | |
| Company-owned life insurance | | 115,586 | | | 105,721 | |
| | | | |
| Loaned securities (Notes 5 and 6) | | 57,499 | | | 66,442 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Right-of-use assets (Note 13) | | 32,985 | | | 37,866 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Assets held for sale (1) | | 0 | | | 24,908 | |
| | | | |
| Other | | 30,488 | | | 39,935 | |
| Total other assets | | $ | 447,447 | | | $ | 409,672 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Prepaid federal income taxes (Note 10) | $ | 134,800 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Company-owned life insurance | 105,721 |
| | 83,377 |
|
| Loaned securities (Note 6) | 66,442 |
| | 27,860 |
|
Internal-use software (1) | 58,356 |
| | 51,367 |
|
Right-of-use assets (2) | 37,866 |
| | — |
|
| Accrued investment income | 32,333 |
| | 34,878 |
|
Property and equipment (3) | 29,523 |
| | 37,090 |
|
Assets held for sale (4) | 24,908 |
| | — |
|
| Deferred policy acquisition costs | 20,759 |
| | 17,311 |
|
| Reinsurance recoverables | 16,976 |
| | 14,402 |
|
| Unbilled receivables | 13,772 |
| | 19,917 |
|
Current federal income tax receivable (5) | — |
| | 44,506 |
|
| Other | 26,163 |
| | 36,992 |
|
| Total other assets | $ | 567,619 |
| | $ | 367,700 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Internal-use software, at cost, has been reduced by accumulated amortization of $73.5 million and $60.3 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as well as $3.8 million of impairment charges in 2019 and $5.1 million of impairment charges in 2018. Amortization expense was $13.0 million, $11.4 million and $10.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
| |
(2) | Represents right-of-use assets recognized as a result of our adoption, as of January 1, 2019, of the new accounting and |
disclosure requirements for leases(1)Related to the sale of property, plantClayton. See Notes 4 and equipment. See Note 27 for additional information. Right-of-useinformation on assets are shown less accumulated amortization of $8.5 millionheld for sale. Liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2019.2019 are included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
| |
(3) | Property and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $68.4 million and $62.9 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Depreciation expense was $7.8 million, $8.0 million and $6.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
| |
(4) | Related to the sale of Clayton. See Notes 4 and 7 for additional information on assets held for sale. Liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2019 are included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(5) | During the year ended December 31, 2019, current federal income tax receivable was reduced by our receipt of the remaining $57.2 million refund from amounts on deposit with the IRS related to the settlement of the IRS Matter. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
10. Income Taxes
Income Tax Provision
The components of our consolidated income tax provision from continuing operations are as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Current provision (benefit) | | $ | (16,264) | | | $ | 19,522 | | | $ | (42,398) | |
| Deferred provision | | 102,079 | | | 157,162 | | | 120,573 | |
| Total income tax provision | | $ | 85,815 | | | $ | 176,684 | | | $ | 78,175 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Current provision (benefit) | $ | 19,522 |
| | $ | (42,398 | ) | | $ | 59,122 |
|
| Deferred provision | 157,162 |
| | 120,573 |
| | 166,527 |
|
| Total income tax provision | $ | 176,684 |
| | $ | 78,175 |
| | $ | 225,649 |
|
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The reconciliation of taxes computed at the statutory tax rate of 21% in 2020, 2019 and 2018 and 35% in 2017 to the provision for income taxes is as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Provision for income taxes computed at the statutory tax rate | | $ | 100,683 | | | $ | 178,289 | | | $ | 143,679 | |
| Change in tax resulting from: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Valuation allowance | | 11,290 | | | 1,941 | | | (1,856) | |
| Uncertain tax positions | | (14,784) | | | 1,202 | | | 2,589 | |
| State tax provision (benefit), net of federal impact | | (9,062) | | | (293) | | | 5,570 | |
| Other, net | | (2,312) | | | (4,455) | | | 1,778 | |
| Impact related to settlement of IRS Matter | | 0 | | | 0 | | | (73,585) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Provision for income taxes | | $ | 85,815 | | | $ | 176,684 | | | $ | 78,175 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Provision for income taxes computed at the statutory tax rate | $ | 178,289 |
| | $ | 143,679 |
| | $ | 121,358 |
|
| Change in tax resulting from: |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Repurchase premium on convertible notes | — |
| | — |
| | (96 | ) |
| State tax provision (benefit), net of federal impact | (293 | ) | | 5,570 |
| | (15,641 | ) |
| Valuation allowance | 1,941 |
| | (1,856 | ) | | 18,197 |
|
| Remeasurement of net deferred tax assets due to the TCJA | — |
| | — |
| | 102,617 |
|
| Impact related to settlement of IRS Matter | — |
| | (73,585 | ) | | — |
|
| Other, net | (3,253 | ) | | 4,367 |
| | (786 | ) |
| Provision for income taxes | $ | 176,684 |
| | $ | 78,175 |
| | $ | 225,649 |
|
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
The significant components of our net deferred tax assets and liabilities from continuing operations are summarized as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | |
| | | | |
| State income taxes, net of federal impact | | $ | 75,499 | | | $ | 65,917 | |
| Goodwill and intangibles | | 32,673 | | | 36,282 | |
| Unearned premiums | | 27,703 | | | 34,394 | |
| Lease liability | | 11,214 | | | 13,293 | |
| Accrued expenses | | 11,140 | | | 11,642 | |
| Share-based compensation | | 9,291 | | | 11,238 | |
| Deferred policy acquisition and ceding commission costs | | 7,043 | | | 11,190 | |
| Loss reserves | | 4,578 | | | 1,920 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Other | | 8,732 | | | 11,188 | |
| Total deferred tax assets | | $ | 187,873 | | | $ | 197,064 | |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | |
| Accrued expenses | $ | 11,642 |
| | $ | 17,487 |
|
| Unearned premiums | 34,394 |
| | 34,686 |
|
| Differences in fair value of financial instruments | — |
| | 1,115 |
|
| Net unrealized loss on investments | — |
| | 16,297 |
|
| State income taxes | 65,917 |
| | 67,069 |
|
| Loss reserves | 1,920 |
| | 1,044 |
|
| Goodwill and intangibles | 36,282 |
| | 35,068 |
|
| Deferred policy acquisition and ceding commission costs | 11,190 |
| | 15,288 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 11,238 |
| | 10,776 |
|
| Lease liability | 13,293 |
| | — |
|
| Other | 11,188 |
| | 13,091 |
|
| Total deferred tax assets | 197,064 |
| | 211,921 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities: | |
| | |
|
| Differences in fair value of financial instruments | 5,708 |
| | — |
|
| Net unrealized gain on investments | 29,303 |
| | — |
|
| Depreciation | 12,803 |
| | 12,201 |
|
| Contingency reserve | 137,983 |
| | — |
|
| Other | 15,914 |
| | 3,581 |
|
| Total deferred tax liabilities | 201,711 |
| | 15,782 |
|
| Less: Valuation allowance | 66,437 |
| | 64,496 |
|
| Net deferred tax asset (liability) | $ | (71,084 | ) | | $ | 131,643 |
|
139
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | |
| | | | |
| Contingency reserve | | $ | 216,122 | | | $ | 137,983 | |
| Net unrealized gain on investments | | 70,057 | | | 29,303 | |
| Depreciation | | 13,029 | | | 12,803 | |
| Differences in fair value of financial instruments | | 9,087 | | | 5,708 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Other | | 15,747 | | | 15,914 | |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | | 324,042 | | | 201,711 | |
| Less: Valuation allowance | | 77,728 | | | 66,437 | |
| Net deferred tax asset (liability) | | $ | (213,897) | | | $ | (71,084) | |
Current and Deferred Taxes
As of December 31, 2019,2020, we recorded a net current income tax payable of $39.1$17.5 million, which primarily relates to applying the standards of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.
Certain entities within our consolidated group have generated net deferred tax assets of approximately $65.8$74.9 million, relating primarily to state and local NOL carryforwards which, if unutilized, will expire during various future tax periods.
As a mortgage guaranty insurer, we are eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations, under Internal Revenue Code Section 832(e) for amounts required by state law or regulation to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves. The deduction is allowed only to the extent that we purchase non-interest bearing U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in an amount equal to the tax benefit derived from deducting any portion of our statutory contingency reserves. As of December 31, 2019, we held $134.8 million of these bonds, which are included as prepaid income taxes within other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. The corresponding deduction of our statutory contingency reserves resulted in the recognition of a net deferred tax liability, which is included in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Valuation Allowances
We are required to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. At each balance sheet date, we assess our need for a valuation allowance. Our assessment is based on all available evidence, both positive and negative. This requires management to exercise judgment and make assumptions regarding whether our deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods. We have determined that certain non-insurance entities within Radian may continue to generate taxable losses on a separate company basis in the near term and may not be able to fully utilize certain state and local NOLs on their state and local tax returns. Therefore, with respect to deferred tax assets relating to these state and local NOLs and other state timing adjustments, we retained a valuation allowance of $77.7 million at December 31, 2020 and $66.4 million at December 31, 20192019.
As a mortgage guaranty insurer, we are eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations, under Internal Revenue Code Section 832(e) for amounts required by state law or regulation to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves. The deduction is allowed only to the extent that we purchase non-interest bearing U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and $64.5 million atLoss Bonds issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in an amount equal to the tax benefit derived from deducting any portion of our statutory contingency reserves. As of December 31, 2018.2020, we held $210.9 million of these bonds, which are included as prepaid income taxes within other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. The corresponding deduction of our statutory contingency reserves resulted in the recognition of a net deferred tax liability. See Note 16 for additional information about our U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds.
IRS Matter
In July 2018, we finalized a settlement with the IRS related to adjustments we had been contesting that resulted from the examination by the IRS of our 2000 through 2007 consolidated federal income tax returns. This settlement with the IRS resolved the issues and concluded all disputes related to the IRS Matter. During 2018, we recorded tax benefits of $73.6 million, which includes both the impact of the settlement with the IRS as well as the reversal of certain previously accrued state and local tax liabilities. In 2018, under the terms of the settlement, Radian utilized its “qualified deposits” with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to settle its $31 million obligation to the IRS, and during the first quarter of 2019, the IRS refunded to Radian the remaining $57.2 million that was previously on deposit. See Note 9 for additional information about these qualified deposits.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
As of December 31, 2019,2020, we have $17.8$3.1 million of net unrecognized tax benefits, including $1.3$1.6 million of interest and penalties, that would affect the effective tax rate, if recognized. Our policy for the recognition of interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions is to record such items as a component of our income tax provision, of which $1.3$0.3 million and $2.2$1.3 million were recorded for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2017,2019, respectively. In 2018, we recorded an income tax benefit of $61.6 million for interest and penalties primarily related to our IRS settlement.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 37,208 | | | $ | 33,552 | |
| Tax positions related to the current year: | | | | |
| Increases | | 250 | | | 3,215 | |
| Decreases | | (1,788) | | | 0 | |
| Tax positions related to prior years: | | | | |
| Increases | | 16,568 | | | 441 | |
| Decreases | | (171) | | | 0 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Lapses of applicable statute of limitation | | (31,818) | | | 0 | |
| Balance at end of period | | $ | 20,249 | | | $ | 37,208 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 33,552 |
| | $ | 123,951 |
|
| Tax positions related to the current year: | | | |
| Increases | 3,215 |
| | 5,058 |
|
| Tax positions related to prior years: | | | |
| Increases | 441 |
| | 26,465 |
|
| Decreases | — |
| | (43,146 | ) |
| Settlements with taxing authorities | — |
| | (52,353 | ) |
| Lapses of applicable statute of limitation | — |
| | (26,423 | ) |
| Balance at end of period | $ | 37,208 |
| | $ | 33,552 |
|
Our total net unrecognized tax benefits increaseddecreased by $3.7$17.0 million from December 31, 20182019 to December 31, 2019,2020, primarily due to the impactlapses of the statute of limitations relating to the 2015 and 2016 tax years offset by the increase of unrecognized tax benefits associated with our recognition of certain premium income.income in prior years. Although unrecognized tax benefits for this item decreased due to statute expirations, the related amounts continued to impact subsequent years, resulting in a corresponding increase. Over the next 12 months, we do not anticipate a material change in our unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by approximately $7.5 million due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations relating to the 2015 and 2016 tax years.benefits. The statute of limitations related to our federal consolidated income tax return remains open for tax years 2015-2018.2017-2019. Additionally, among the entities within our consolidated group, various tax years remain open to potential examination by state and local taxing authorities.
11. Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
Our reserve for losses and LAE, at the end of each period indicated, consisted of:of the following.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Mortgage insurance loss reserves (1) | | $ | 844,107 | | | $ | 401,273 | |
| Title insurance loss reserves | | 4,306 | | | 3,492 | |
| Total reserve for losses and LAE | | $ | 848,413 | | | $ | 404,765 | |
(1)Primarily comprises first lien primary case reserves of $799.5 million and $339.8 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
Mortgage Insurance loss reserves (1) | $ | 401,273 |
| | $ | 397,891 |
|
Services loss reserves (2) | 3,492 |
| | 3,470 |
|
| Total reserve for losses and LAE | $ | 404,765 |
| | $ | 401,361 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Primarily comprises first lien primary case reserves of $339.8 million and $361.7 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
| |
(2) | A majority of this amount is subject to reinsurance, with the related reinsurance recoverables reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheet, and relates to Radian Title Insurance. For all periods presented, total incurred losses and paid claims for Radian Title Insurance were not material. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
For the periods indicated, the following table presents information relating to our mortgage insurance reserve for losses, including our IBNR reserve and LAE, but excluding our second-lien mortgage loan PDR:PDR.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Balance at January 1, | | $ | 401,273 | | | $ | 397,891 | | | $ | 507,588 | |
Less: Reinsurance recoverables (1) | | 14,594 | | | 11,009 | | | 8,350 | |
| Balance at January 1, net of reinsurance recoverables | | 386,679 | | | 386,882 | | | 499,238 | |
| Add: Losses and LAE incurred in respect of default notices reported and unreported in: | | | | | | |
Current year (2) | | 517,807 | | | 146,733 | | | 135,291 | |
| Prior years | | (34,547) | | | (14,709) | | | (31,699) | |
| Total incurred | | 483,260 | | | 132,024 | | | 103,592 | |
| Deduct: Paid claims and LAE related to: | | | | | | |
Current year (2) | | 4,148 | | | 4,220 | | | 5,856 | |
| Prior years | | 93,453 | | | 128,007 | | | 210,092 | |
| Total paid | | 97,601 | | | 132,227 | | | 215,948 | |
| Balance at end of period, net of reinsurance recoverables | | 772,338 | | | 386,679 | | | 386,882 | |
Add: reinsurance recoverables (1) | | 71,769 | | | 14,594 | | | 11,009 | |
| Balance at December 31, | | $ | 844,107 | | | $ | 401,273 | | | $ | 397,891 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | |
| Balance at January 1, | $ | 397,891 |
| | $ | 507,588 |
| | $ | 760,269 |
| |
Less: Reinsurance recoverables (1) | 11,009 |
| | 8,350 |
| | 6,851 |
| |
| Balance at January 1, net of reinsurance recoverables | 386,882 |
| | 499,238 |
| | 753,418 |
| |
| Add: Losses and LAE incurred in respect of default notices reported and unreported in: | | | | | | |
Current year (2) | 146,733 |
| | 135,291 |
| | 185,486 |
| |
| Prior years | (14,709 | ) | | (31,699 | ) | | (49,286 | ) | |
| Total incurred | 132,024 |
| | 103,592 |
| | 136,200 |
| |
| Deduct: Paid claims and LAE related to: | | | | | | |
Current year (2) | 4,220 |
| | 5,856 |
| | 25,011 |
| |
| Prior years | 128,007 |
| | 210,092 |
| | 365,369 |
| |
| Total paid | 132,227 |
| | 215,948 |
| | 390,380 |
| (3) |
| Balance at end of period, net of reinsurance recoverables | 386,679 |
| | 386,882 |
| | 499,238 |
| |
Add: reinsurance recoverables (1) | 14,594 |
| | 11,009 |
| | 8,350 |
| |
| Balance at December 31, | $ | 401,273 |
| | $ | 397,891 |
| | $ | 507,588 |
| |
______________________(2)Related to underlying defaulted loans with a most recent default notice dated in the year indicated. For example, if a loan had defaulted in a prior year, but then subsequently cured and later re-defaulted in the current year, that default would be considered a current year default.
| |
(1) | Related to ceded losses recoverable, if any, on reinsurance transactions. See Note 8 for additional information. |
| |
(2) | Related to underlying defaulted loans with a most recent default notice dated in the year indicated. For example, if a loan had defaulted in a prior year, but then subsequently cured and later re-defaulted in the current year, that default would be considered a current year default. For 2017, includes payments made on pool commutations, in some cases for loans not previously in default. |
| |
(3) | Includes the payment of $54.8 million made in connection with the scheduled final settlement of the Freddie Mac Agreement in the third quarter of 2017. |
Reserve Activity
Incurred Losses
For all periods presented, our case reserves established for new first-lien primary default notices were the primary driver of our total incurred losses, and they were primarily impacted by the number of new primary default notices received in the period and our related gross Default to Claim Rate assumption applied to those new defaults, as reflecteddefaults. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we experienced a significant increase in the number of new primary default notices, substantially all related to defaults of loans subject to forbearance programs implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. New primary default notices totaled 108,025 for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to 40,985 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our gross Default to Claim Rate table below. Additionally,assumption applied to new defaults was 8.5% as of December 31, 2020, compared to 7.5% as of December 31, 2019. This increase reflects the estimated impact of a worsening macroeconomic environment, partially offset by the expected beneficial effects of mortgage relief options and other protections, including forbearance programs under the CARES Act.
For all periods presented, our provision for losses was positivelyalso impacted by favorable reserve development on prior year defaults. This favorable development in all periods wasdefaults, primarily driven by a reduction during the period in certain Defaultdue to Claim Rate assumptions for these prior year defaults based on observed trends.higher Cures than previously estimated. For 2019, this favorable development was partially offset by a $30.5 million increase in our IBNR reserve estimate. The increase in our IBNR reserve estimate is related to certain legal proceedings involving challenges from certain servicers regarding our Loss Mitigation Activities, which challenges may result in the reversal of certain decisions regarding prior Rescissions, Claim Denials or Claim Curtailments.Activities. See Note 13 for additional information.
Hurricane Impact 2018/2017information. During
See also Note 1 for additional information on the third quarterelevated risks and uncertainties resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic to our business and Note 2 for discussion of 2017, Hurricanes Harvey and Irma caused extensive property damage to areas of Texas, Florida and Georgia, as well as other general disruptions including power outages and flooding. Following Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, we observed an increase in new primary defaults from FEMA Designated Areas associated with these hurricanes. As expected, most of these hurricane-related defaults cured by the end of 2018, and at higher cure rates thanreserving methodology for the rates for our general population of defaults. These incremental defaults did not have a material impact on our provisionmortgage insurance industry, which requires that reserves for losses in 2017 or 2018.are generally not established until receipt of notification from servicers that a borrower has missed 2 payments.
Default to Claim Rate.Our Default to Claim Rate estimates on defaulted loans are mainly developed based on the Stage of Default and Time in Default of the underlying defaulted loans grouped according to the period in which the default occurred,
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
as measured by the progress toward foreclosure sale and the number of months in default. Our estimate of expected Rescissions and Claim Denials (net of expected Reinstatements) embedded in our estimated net Default to Claim Rate is generally based on our recent experience. Consideration is also given to differences in characteristics between those rescinded policies and denied
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
claims and the loans remaining in our defaulted inventory. The following table shows our gross Default to Claim Rates on our primary portfolio based on the Time in Default and as of the dates indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Default to Claim Rate on: | | | | | | |
| New defaults | | 8.5 | % | | 7.5 | % | | 8.0 | % |
| Defaults not in Foreclosure Stage: | | | | | | |
Time in Default: < 2 years (1) | | 21.0 | % | | 22.0 | % | | 23.0 | % |
| Time in Default: 2 - 5 years | | 62.5 | % | | 48.0 | % | | 52.0 | % |
| Time in Default: > 5 years | | 70.0 | % | | 63.0 | % | | 68.0 | % |
| Foreclosure Stage Defaults | | 75.0 | % | | 70.0 | % | | 75.0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Default to Claim Rate on: | | | | | |
New defaults (1) | 7.5 | % | | 8.0 | % | | 10.0 | % |
| Defaults not in Foreclosure Stage: | | | | | |
Time in Default: <= 5 years (1) (2) | 23.9 | % | | 25.8 | % | | 28.3 | % |
| Time in Default: > 5 years | 63.0 | % | | 68.0 | % | | 62.0 | % |
| Foreclosure Stage Defaults | 70.0 | % | | 75.0 | % | | 81.0 | % |
______________________
| |
(1) | A 3% Default to Claim Rate assumption was assigned to the new primary defaults from FEMA Designated Areas associated with Hurricanes Harvey and Irma that were reported subsequent to those 2 natural disasters in 2017 and through February 2018. |
| |
(2) | Represents the weighted average Default to Claim Rate for all defaults not in foreclosure stage that have been in default for up to five years, including new defaults. The estimated Default to Claim Rates applied to defaults within this population vary by Time in Default, and range from the Default to Claim Rates on new defaults shown above, up to 55.6%, 57.4% and 62.0% for more aged defaults in this category as of December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. |
Claims Paid
TotalThe decrease in claims paid continuein 2020 is primarily attributable to COVID-19-related forbearance plans and suspensions of foreclosures and evictions. Claims paid in 2020 include payments made to settle certain previously disclosed legal proceedings. See Note 13 for additional information about these legal proceedings. The decrease in total claims paid is consistent with the ongoing decline in the outstanding default inventory. Claims paid for 2017 were higher because they included payments that were made in connection with the scheduled final settlement of the Freddie Mac Agreement in the third quarter of 2017.inventory prior to 2020.
Concentration of Risk
As of December 31, 2019, California is the only2020, there was 0 state that accounted for more than 10% of our mortgage insurance business measured by primary RIF. California accounted for 11.2%As of our Mortgage Insurance segment’s primary RIF at December 31, 2019, comparedCalifornia, at 11.2%, was the only state to 12.3% at December 31, 2018.account for more than 10% of primary RIF. California also accounted for 10.6%10.4% of our Mortgage Insurance segment’s direct primary NIW for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, compared to 11.9%10.6% and 14.1%11.9% for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Additional Disclosures
The following tables provide information as of and for the periods indicated about: (i) incurred losses, net of reinsurance; (ii) the total of IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claims, included within the net incurred loss amounts; (iii) the cumulative number of reported defaults; and (iv) cumulative paid claims, net of reinsurance. The default year represents the period that a new default notice is first reported to us by loan servicers, related to borrowers that missed 2 monthly payments.
The information about net incurred losses and paid claims development for the years ended prior to 20192020 is presented as supplementary information.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Incurred Losses, Net of Reinsurance ($ in thousands) | | Total of IBNR Liabilities Plus Expected Development on Reported Claims (1) | | Cumulative Number of Reported Defaults (2) |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| Default Year | | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | | |
| Unaudited | | | As of December 31, 2020 |
| 2011 | | $ | 1,058,625 | | $ | 1,152,016 | | $ | 1,052,277 | | $ | 1,050,555 | | $ | 1,062,579 | | $ | 1,061,161 | | $ | 1,059,116 | | $ | 1,060,376 | | $ | 1,064,054 | | $ | 1,062,826 | | | $ | 578 | | | 117,019 | |
| 2012 | | | 803,831 | | 763,969 | | 711,213 | | 720,502 | | 715,646 | | 714,783 | | 713,750 | | 713,839 | | 713,146 | | | 313 | | | 88,555 | |
| 2013 | | | | 505,732 | | 405,334 | | 401,444 | | 404,333 | | 402,259 | | 400,243 | | 399,356 | | 399,317 | | | 150 | | | 70,723 | |
| 2014 | | | | | 337,784 | | 247,074 | | 265,891 | | 264,620 | | 260,098 | | 261,507 | | 261,377 | | | 73 | | | 57,541 | |
| 2015 | | | | | | 222,555 | | 198,186 | | 178,042 | | 183,952 | | 183,546 | | 184,066 | | | 69 | | | 49,255 | |
| 2016 | | | | | | | 201,016 | | 165,440 | | 149,753 | | 148,811 | | 148,640 | | | 75 | | | 45,824 | |
| 2017 | | | | | | | | 180,851 | | 151,802 | | 133,357 | | 130,274 | | | 144 | | | 46,956 | |
| 2018 | | | | | | | | | 131,513 | | 116,634 | | 95,534 | | | 279 | | | 39,341 | |
| 2019 | | | | | | | | | | 143,475 | | 136,860 | | | 809 | | | 42,884 | |
| 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | 504,160 | | | 4,540 | | | 109,411 | |
| Total | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 3,636,200 | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Incurred Losses, Net of Reinsurance | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | As of December 31, 2019 |
| ($ in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | Total of IBNR Liabilities Plus Expected Development on Reported Claims (1) | | Cumulative Number of Reported Defaults (2) |
| | Unaudited | | |
| Default Year | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
| 2010 | $ | 1,102,856 |
| $ | 1,215,136 |
| $ | 1,192,482 |
| $ | 1,195,056 |
| $ | 1,207,774 |
| $ | 1,220,289 |
| $ | 1,218,264 |
| $ | 1,219,469 |
| $ | 1,221,938 |
| $ | 1,225,474 |
| | $ | 5,292 |
| | 146,324 |
|
| 2011 | | 1,058,625 |
| 1,152,016 |
| 1,052,277 |
| 1,050,555 |
| 1,062,579 |
| 1,061,161 |
| 1,059,116 |
| 1,060,376 |
| 1,064,054 |
| | 5,020 |
| | 118,972 |
|
| 2012 | | | 803,831 |
| 763,969 |
| 711,213 |
| 720,502 |
| 715,646 |
| 714,783 |
| 713,750 |
| 713,839 |
| | 2,652 |
| | 89,845 |
|
| 2013 | | | | 505,732 |
| 405,334 |
| 401,444 |
| 404,333 |
| 402,259 |
| 400,243 |
| 399,356 |
| | 1,172 |
| | 71,749 |
|
| 2014 | | | | | 337,784 |
| 247,074 |
| 265,891 |
| 264,620 |
| 260,098 |
| 261,507 |
| | 398 |
| | 58,215 |
|
| 2015 | | | | | | 222,555 |
| 198,186 |
| 178,042 |
| 183,952 |
| 183,546 |
| | 160 |
| | 49,825 |
|
| 2016 | | | | | | | 201,016 |
| 165,440 |
| 149,753 |
| 148,811 |
| | 115 |
| | 46,264 |
|
| 2017 | | | | | | | | 180,851 |
| 151,802 |
| 133,357 |
| | 264 |
| | 47,283 |
|
| 2018 | | | | | | | | | 131,513 |
| 116,634 |
| | 650 |
| | 39,598 |
|
| 2019 | | | | | | | | | | 143,475 |
| | 3,117 |
| | 42,884 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Total |
| $ | 4,390,053 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Represents reserves as of December 31, 2019 related to IBNR liabilities. |
| |
(2) | Represents total number of new default notices received in each calendar year as compiled monthly based on reports received from loan servicers. As reflected in our Default to Claim Rate assumptions, a significant portion of reported defaults generally do not result in a claim. In certain instances, a defaulted loan may cure, and then re-default in a later period. Consistent with our reserving practice, each new event of default is treated as a unique occurrence and therefore certain loans that cure and re-default may be included as a reported default in multiple periods. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cumulative Paid Claims, Net of Reinsurance |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | Unaudited | | |
| Default Year | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 |
| 2011 | | $ | 40,392 | | | $ | 323,216 | | | $ | 756,820 | | | $ | 892,959 | | | $ | 982,830 | | | $ | 1,016,855 | | | $ | 1,038,582 | | | $ | 1,048,966 | | | $ | 1,052,688 | | | $ | 1,057,199 | |
| 2012 | | | | 19,200 | | | 295,332 | | | 528,744 | | | 631,982 | | | 672,271 | | | 692,291 | | | 702,136 | | | 704,770 | | | 708,528 | |
| 2013 | | | | | | 34,504 | | | 191,040 | | | 307,361 | | | 357,087 | | | 379,036 | | | 388,688 | | | 392,818 | | | 395,093 | |
| 2014 | | | | | | | | 13,108 | | | 115,852 | | | 200,422 | | | 233,607 | | | 246,611 | | | 252,619 | | | 255,742 | |
| 2015 | | | | | | | | | | 10,479 | | | 84,271 | | | 142,421 | | | 163,916 | | | 172,645 | | | 174,812 | |
| 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | 11,061 | | | 76,616 | | | 119,357 | | | 134,115 | | | 137,306 | |
| 2017 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,653 | | | 66,585 | | | 99,678 | | | 108,484 | |
| 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,584 | | | 36,066 | | | 54,625 | |
| 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,220 | | | 18,703 | |
| 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,148 | |
| Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 2,914,640 | |
| All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance | | 30,257 | |
Liabilities for claims, net of reinsurance (1) | | $ | 751,817 | |
(1)Calculated as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cumulative Paid Claims, Net of Reinsurance |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | | | | | | | | |
| | Unaudited | |
| Default Year | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
| 2010 | $ | 11,810 |
| $ | 394,278 |
| $ | 700,316 |
| $ | 956,598 |
| $ | 1,055,935 |
| $ | 1,145,497 |
| $ | 1,178,546 |
| $ | 1,198,031 |
| $ | 1,210,281 |
| $ | 1,214,558 |
|
| 2011 | | 40,392 |
| 323,216 |
| 756,820 |
| 892,959 |
| 982,830 |
| 1,016,855 |
| 1,038,582 |
| 1,048,966 |
| 1,052,688 |
|
| 2012 | | | 19,200 |
| 295,332 |
| 528,744 |
| 631,982 |
| 672,271 |
| 692,291 |
| 702,136 |
| 704,770 |
|
| 2013 | | | | 34,504 |
| 191,040 |
| 307,361 |
| 357,087 |
| 379,036 |
| 388,688 |
| 392,818 |
|
| 2014 | | | | | 13,108 |
| 115,852 |
| 200,422 |
| 233,607 |
| 246,611 |
| 252,619 |
|
| 2015 | | | | | | 10,479 |
| 84,271 |
| 142,421 |
| 163,916 |
| 172,645 |
|
| 2016 | | | | | | | 11,061 |
| 76,616 |
| 119,357 |
| 134,115 |
|
| 2017 | | | | | | | | 24,653 |
| 66,585 |
| 99,678 |
|
| 2018 | | | | | | | | | 5,584 |
| 36,066 |
|
| 2019 | | | | | | | | | | 4,220 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Total |
| $ | 4,064,177 |
|
| | | | | | All outstanding liabilities before 2010, net of reinsurance | | 51,883 |
|
| | | | | | Liabilities for claims, net of reinsurance (1) | | $ | 377,759 |
|
______________________
| | | | | | | | |
(1)(In thousands) | Calculated as follows: | |
| Incurred losses, net of reinsurance | | $ | 3,636,200 | |
| All outstanding liabilities before 2011, net of reinsurance | | 30,257 | |
| Cumulative paid claims, net of reinsurance | | (2,914,640) | |
| Liabilities for claims, net of reinsurance | | $ | 751,817 | |
|
| | | |
| (In thousands) | |
| Incurred losses, net of reinsurance | $ | 4,390,053 |
|
| Add: All outstanding liabilities before 2010, net of reinsurance | 51,883 |
|
| Less: Cumulative paid claims, net of reinsurance | 4,064,177 |
|
| Liabilities for claims, net of reinsurance | $ | 377,759 |
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of the net incurred losses and paid claims development tables above to the Mortgage Insurancemortgage insurance reserve for losses and LAE at December 31, 2019:2020.
|
| | | |
| (In thousands) | December 31, 2019 |
| Net outstanding liabilities - Mortgage Insurance: | |
| Reserve for losses and LAE, net of reinsurance | $ | 377,759 |
|
| Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid claims | 14,594 |
|
| Unallocated LAE | 8,920 |
|
Total gross reserve for losses and LAE (1) | $ | 401,273 |
|
______________________
| | | | | | | | |
(1)(In thousands) | Excludes Services | December 31, 2020 |
| Net outstanding liabilities - mortgage insurance: | | |
| Reserve for losses and LAE, net of reinsurance | | $ | 751,817 | |
| Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid claims | | 71,769 | |
| Unallocated LAE | | 20,521 | |
Total gross reserve for losses and LAE of $3.5 million. (1) | | $ | 844,107 | |
(1)Excludes title insurance reserve for losses and LAE of $4.3 million.
The following is supplementary information about average historical claims duration as of December 31, 2019,2020, representing the average distribution of when claims are paid relative to the year of default:default.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Losses by Age, Net of Reinsurance (Unaudited) |
| Years | | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | | 6 | | 7 | | 8 | | 9 | | 10 |
| Mortgage insurance | | 6.2% | | 33.6% | | 30.0% | | 11.5% | | 5.2% | | 2.4% | | 1.4% | | 0.6% | | 0.4% | | 0.4% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average Annual Percentage Payout of Incurred Losses by Age, Net of Reinsurance (Unaudited) |
| Years | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Mortgage Insurance | 6.0% | 35.2% | 30.6% | 13.6% | 6.2% | 3.6% | 1.8% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.3% |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
12. Borrowings and Financing Activities
The carrying value of our debt at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 was as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| ($ in thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Senior notes: | | | | |
| Senior Notes due 2024 | | $ | 445,512 | | | $ | 444,445 | |
| Senior Notes due 2025 | | 516,634 | | | 0 | |
| Senior Notes due 2027 | | 443,528 | | | 442,665 | |
| Total senior notes | | $ | 1,405,674 | | | $ | 887,110�� | |
| | | | | |
| FHLB advances: | | | | |
| FHLB advances due 2020 | | $ | — | | | $ | 79,002 | |
| FHLB advances due 2021 | | 67,500 | | | 19,000 | |
| FHLB advances due 2022 | | 61,050 | | | 11,925 | |
| FHLB advances due 2023 | | 27,995 | | | 14,994 | |
| FHLB advances due 2024 | | 9,954 | | | 9,954 | |
| FHLB advances due 2025 | | 9,984 | | | 0 | |
| Total FHLB advances | | $ | 176,483 | | | $ | 134,875 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| ($ in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Senior notes: | | | |
| 5.500% Senior Notes due 2019 | $ | — |
| | $ | 158,324 |
|
| 5.250% Senior Notes due 2020 | — |
| | 232,729 |
|
| 7.000% Senior Notes due 2021 | — |
| | 195,867 |
|
| 4.500% Senior Notes due 2024 | 444,445 |
| | 443,428 |
|
| 4.875% Senior Notes due 2027 | 442,665 |
| | — |
|
| Total Senior Notes | $ | 887,110 |
| | $ | 1,030,348 |
|
| | | | |
| FHLB advances: | | | |
| FHLB advances due 2019 | $ | — |
| | $ | 60,550 |
|
| FHLB advances due 2020 | 79,002 |
| | 2,991 |
|
| FHLB advances due 2021 | 19,000 |
| | 8,000 |
|
| FHLB advances due 2022 | 11,925 |
| | — |
|
| FHLB advances due 2023 | 14,994 |
| | 8,995 |
|
| FHLB advances due 2024 | 9,954 |
| | 1,996 |
|
| Total FHLB advances | $ | 134,875 |
| | $ | 82,532 |
|
Extinguishment of Debt
2019 Activity
Repayment of Senior Notes due 20192019.. In accordance with the terms of the notes under the related indenture, we retired the remaining aggregate principal amount of $158.6 million of outstanding Senior Notes due 2019 upon their maturity in June 2019.
Repurchases of Senior Notes due 2020 and 20212021. . During the second quarter of 2019, pursuant to cash tender offers to purchase any and all of our outstanding Senior Notes due 2020 and 2021, we purchased aggregate principal amounts of $207.2 million and $127.3 million of our Senior Notes due 2020 and 2021, respectively. We funded the purchases with $351.8 million in cash (which includes accrued and unpaid interest due on the purchased notes). These purchases resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $16.8 million.
During the third quarter of 2019, we redeemed the remaining $27.0 million and $70.4 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2020 and 2021, respectively, in accordance with the terms of the related indentures. The aggregate redemption amount paid was $103.1 million, which includes accrued interest through the applicable redemption dates. These purchases resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $5.9 million.
Following these purchases and redemptions, there were 0 remaining principal amounts outstanding on the Senior Notes due 2020 and 2021 at December 31, 2019.
2017 Activity
Repurchases of Senior Notes due 2019, 2020 and 2021. During the third quarter of 2017, pursuant to cash tender offers, we purchased aggregate principal amounts of $141.4 million, $115.9 million and $152.3 million of our Senior Notes due 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. We funded the purchases with $450.8 million in cash (plus accrued and unpaid interest due on the purchased notes). These purchases resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $45.8 million. At December 31, 2017, the remaining principal amounts of our outstanding Senior Notes due 2019, 2020 and 2021 were $158.6 million, $234.1 million and $197.7 million, respectively.
Repurchases of Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 and 2019. During the second quarter of 2017, we purchased an aggregate principal amount of $21.6 million of our outstanding Convertible Senior Notes due 2017. We funded the purchases
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
with $31.6 million in cash (plus accrued and unpaid interest due on the purchased notes). These purchases of Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million.
In connection with our purchases of Convertible Senior Notes due 2017, we terminated a corresponding portion of the capped call transactions we entered into in 2010 related to the initial issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes due 2017. We received proceeds of $4.1 million for this termination.
In November 2016, we announced our intent to exercise our redemption option for the remaining $68.0 million aggregate principal amount of our Convertible Senior Notes due 2019. As a result of the average closing price of our common stock exceeding the conversion price of $10.60 prior to the redemption date, all of the holders of these notes elected to exercise their conversion rights. Radian elected to settle all of the notes surrendered for conversion with cash. We settled our obligations with respect to these conversions on January 27, 2017, with a cash payment of $110.1 million. At the time of settlement, this transaction resulted in a pretax charge of $4.5 million, representing the difference between the fair value and the carrying value, net of unamortized issuance costs, of the liability component of the Convertible Senior Notes due 2019. This transaction also resulted in an aggregate decrease as of the settlement date of 6.4 million diluted shares for the purposes of determining diluted net income per share.
As of December 31, 2017, there were 0 Convertible Senior Notes due 2017 or Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 outstanding.
Senior Notes
Senior Notes due 2024. In September 2017, we issued $450 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2024 and received net proceeds of $442.2 million. These notes mature on October 1, 2024 and bear interest at a rate of 4.500% per annum, payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year, with interest payments commencing on April 1, 2018.
Senior Notes due 2025. In May 2020, we issued $525 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2025 and received net proceeds of $515.6 million. These notes mature on March 15, 2025 and bear interest at a rate of 6.625% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, with interest payments commencing on September 15, 2020.
Senior Notes due 2027. In June 2019, we issued $450 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2027 and received net proceeds of $442.2 million. These notes mature on March 15, 2027 and bear interest at a rate of 4.875% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, with interest payments commencing on March 15, 2020.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Redemption Terms in Senior Notes. We have the option to redeem the Senior Notes due 2024, 2025 and 2027, in whole or in part, at any time, or from time to time, prior to July 1, 2024 (the date that is three months prior to the maturity date of the Senior notes due 2024), September 15, 2024 (the date that is six months prior to the maturity date of the Senior notes due 2025) and September 15, 2026 (the date that is six months prior to the maturity date of the Senior notes due 2027) (the(in each case, the “Par Call Date”), respectively, at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed and (ii) the make-whole amount, which is the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest in respect of the notes to be redeemed from the redemption date to the Par Call Date discounted to the redemption date at the applicable treasury rate plus 50 basis points, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date. At any time on or after the Par Call Date, we may, at our option, redeem the notes in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Covenants in Senior Notes. The indentures governing the Senior Notes due 2024, 2025 and 2027 contain covenants customary for securities of this nature, including covenants related to the payments of the notes, periodic reporting and certificates to be issued and covenants related to amendments to the indentures. Additionally, the indentures include covenants restricting us from encumbering the capital stock of a designated subsidiary (as defined in the indenture for the notes) or disposing of any capital stock of any designated subsidiary unless either all of the stock is disposed of or we retain more than 80% of the stock. We were in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2019.2020.
FHLB Advances
In August 2016, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance became members of the FHLB. As members, they may borrow from the FHLB, subject to certain conditions, which include the need to post collateral and the requirement to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock, in part depending on the level of their outstanding FHLB advances.
As of December 31, 2019,2020, we had $134.9$176.5 million of fixed-rate advances outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 2.14%1.12%. Interest on the FHLB advances is payable quarterly, or at maturity if the term of the advance is less than 90 days. Principal is due at maturity. For obligations with maturities greater than or equal to 90 days, we may prepay the debt at any time, subject to the calculation and payment of a prepayment fee calculation.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The principal balance of the FHLB advances areis required to be collateralized by eligible assets with a market value that must be maintained atgenerally within a minimumrange of approximately 103% to 105%111% of market value, depending on the principal balancetype of the FHLB advances.collateral pledged. Our fixed-maturities available for sale include securities totaling $143.1$188.0 million and $88.4$143.1 million at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively, which serve as collateral for our FHLB advances to satisfy this requirement.
Revolving Credit Facility
Radian Group has in place a $267.5 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of bank lenders, which is scheduled to expire on October 16, 2020.has a maturity date of January 18, 2022. Terms of the credit facility include an accordion feature that allows Radian Group, at its option, to increase the total borrowing capacity during the term of the agreement, subject to our obtaining the necessary increased commitments from lenders (which may include then existing or other lenders), up to a total of $300 million.
Subject to certain limitations, borrowings under the credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including capital contributions to Radian Group’s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries as well as growth initiatives. The credit facility contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, terms and conditions. Our ability to borrow under the credit facility is conditioned on the satisfaction of certain financial and other covenants, including covenants related to minimum net worth and statutory surplus, a maximum debt-to-capitalization level, limits on certain types of indebtedness and liens, minimum liquidity levels and Radian Guaranty’s eligibility as a private mortgage insurer with the GSEs. At December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Group was in compliance with all the covenants and there were 0 amounts outstanding under this revolving credit facility.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
We are routinely involved in a number of legal actions and proceedings, including reviews, audits and inquiries by various regulatory entities, as well as litigation and other disputes arising in the ordinary course of our business. These proceedings could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restitutions or other relief that could require significant expenditures or have other effects on our business. Management believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. The outcome of litigation and other legal and regulatory matters and proceedings is inherently uncertain, and it is possible that one1 or more of the matters currently pending or threatened could have an adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations for any particular period. In accordance with applicable accounting standards and guidance, we establish accruals
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
only when we determine both that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. We accrue the amount that represents our best estimate of the probable loss; however, if we can only determine a range of estimated losses, we accrue an amount within the range that, in our judgment, reflects the most likely outcome, and if none of the estimates within the range is more likely, we accrue the minimum amount of the range.
In the course of our regular review of pending legal and regulatory matters, we determine whether it is reasonably possible that a potential loss may have a material impact on our liquidity, results of operations or financial condition. If we determine such a loss is reasonably possible, we disclose information relating to such potential loss, including an estimate or range of loss or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. On a quarterly basis, we review relevant information with respect to loss contingencies and update our accruals, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible losses or range of losses based on such reviews. We are often unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss until developments in such matters have provided sufficient information to support an assessment of the range of possible loss, such as quantification of a damage demand from plaintiffs, discovery from other parties and investigation of factual allegations, rulings by the court on motions or appeals, analysis by experts, and the progress of settlement negotiations. In addition, we generally make no disclosures for loss contingencies that are determined to be remote. For matters for which we disclose an estimated loss, the disclosed estimate reflects the reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amount accrued, if any.
Loss estimates are inherently subjective, based on currently available information, and are subject to management’s judgment and various assumptions. Due to the inherently subjective nature of these estimates and the uncertainty and unpredictability surrounding the outcome of legal and other proceedings, actual results may differ materially from any amounts that have been accrued.
On December 22, 2016, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Homeward Residential, Inc. (collectively, “Ocwen”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Radian Guaranty alleging breach of contract and bad faith claims and seeking monetary damages and declaratory relief.relief (the “Litigation”). Ocwen has also initiated similar legal
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
proceedings against several other mortgage insurers. On December 17, 2016, Ocwen separately filed a parallel arbitration petition against Radian Guaranty before the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) asserting substantially the same allegations (the “Arbitration”). Ocwen’s filings together listed 9,420 mortgage insurance certificates issued under multiple insurance policies, including Pool Mortgage Insurance policies, as subject to the dispute. On June 5, 2017, Ocwen filed an amended complaint and an amended petition (collectively, the “Amended Filings”) with both the court and the AAA, respectively, together listing 8,870 certificates as subject to the dispute. On April 11, 2018, the parties entered into a confidential agreement with respect to all certificates subject to the dispute. The confidential agreement resolved certain categories of claims involved in the dispute and, on April 12, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation of voluntary dismissal of the federal court proceedingLitigation and the trial judge issued an order dismissing all claims and counterclaims subject toin the parties’ agreement.Litigation. Radian Guaranty was not required to make any payment in connection with this confidential agreement. Pursuant to the confidential agreement, the parties: (1)(i) dismissed the federal court proceeding; (2)Litigation; (ii) narrowed the scope of the disputeArbitration to Ocwen’s breach of contract claims seeking payment of insurance benefits on approximately 2,500 certificates that Ocwen was previously pursuing through the Amended Filings; and (3)(iii) agreed to resolve the remainingArbitration through an alternative dispute throughresolution process administered by the Arbitration. TheAAA (the “ADR Process”). Effective June 30, 2020, Radian Guaranty, PHH Mortgage Corporation, on behalf of itself, and as successor by merger to Ocwen (collectively, “PHH”), and Ocwen Financial Corporation entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Ocwen Settlement”) to fully resolve, among other things, all claims subject to the ADR Process. Implementation of the Ocwen Settlement, which was subject to the condition precedent that the GSEs consent to the settlement agreement, became effective on November 1, 2020 upon finalization of the consents. Pursuant to the Ocwen Settlement, among other things: (i) Radian made a cash settlement payment on November 6, 2020 and (ii) each party agreed to release the other with respect to all known or unknown claims with respect to the certificates subject to the ADR Process as well as with respect to all other certificates issued on loans serviced by PHH for which Radian decided claims prior to January 1, 2019. On November 13, 2020, the Arbitration is proceeding, and Radian continues to defend against Ocwen’s claims vigorously.ADR Process was dismissed with prejudice.
On August 31, 2018, Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (“Nationstar”) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Radian Guaranty (the “Complaint”) alleging breach of contract, bad faith,equitable indemnification, unjust enrichment, and conversion claims and seeking monetary damages and declaratory relief. Exhibit 1 to the Complaint lists 3,014 mortgage insurance certificates issued under multiple insurance policies as subject to disputes involving insurance coverage decisions (the “Coverage Disputed Loans”). Exhibit 2 to the Complaint further lists 2,231 mortgage insurance certificates issued under multiple insurance policies as subject to disputes involving premium refund requests. In December 2018, Radian Guaranty filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint. In March 2019, the trial judge issued an order granting in part, and denying in part, our motion to dismiss, and dismissed Nationstar’s unjust enrichment and conversion claims. In May 2019, Radian Guaranty filed an answer to the Complaint, with affirmative defenses and counterclaims, in response to the Complaint.counterclaims. On September 23, 2019, the trial judge entered as an order a joint stipulation submitted by Nationstar and Radian Guaranty that narrowed the scope of the dispute involving Coverage Disputed Loans to claims relating to 1,704 mortgage insurance certificates. Effective June 26, 2020, Radian Guaranty believesand Nationstar entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Nationstar Settlement”) to fully resolve, among other things, all claims and counterclaims in this litigation. Pursuant to the Nationstar Settlement, among other things: (i) Radian agreed to make a cash settlement payment following the implementation of the Nationstar Settlement and (ii) each party agreed to release the other with respect to all known or unknown claims with respect to the certificates subject to this litigation as well as with respect to all other certificates issued under certain policies on loans serviced by Nationstar for
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
which Radian decided claims prior to January 1, 2019. Implementation of the Nationstar Settlement remains subject to the condition precedent that Nationstar’s allegationsthe GSEs consent to the settlement agreement. On July 9, 2020, the trial judge granted the parties’ joint motion requesting to stay this litigation pending receipt of required consents. On January 5, 2021, counsel for Radian and claimsNationstar submitted a joint status report to the trial judge reporting that the parties anticipate receiving the GSE consents, and that the case will be dismissed in the near future.
As previously disclosed, based on developments in the Ocwen and Nationstar legal proceedings describeddiscussed above, are without merit and legally deficient, and continues to defend against these claims vigorously.
In 2019, the Company increased itsCompany’s IBNR reserve estimate by $30.5 million relatedwas increased in 2019 to reflect our best estimate as of that time of our probable loss in connection with the abovethese legal proceedings. While Radian believes it has substantial defenses inThe settlement agreements are materially consistent with these mattersestimates, and intends to continue to defend against these claims vigorously, it is not feasible to predict the ultimate outcome of these disputes, and the Company could in the future be required to pay amounts as a result, the implementation of settlementsthe Ocwen Settlement, which became effective as of November 1, 2020, and the execution and expected implementation of the Nationstar Settlement, do not have a material impact on our mortgage insurance reserves for these legal proceedings. A failure to receive the required consents of the GSEs to the Nationstar Settlement could restart the applicable legal proceeding, the outcome of which could have an adverse effect on our future results of operations, liquidity or decisions in these matters, potentially in excess of accruals.financial condition.
We also are periodically subject to reviews and audits, as well as inquiries, information-gathering requests and investigations. In connection with these matters, from time to time we receive requests and subpoenas seeking information and documents related to aspects of our business.
Our Master Policies establish the timeline within which any suit or action arising from any right of an insured under the policy generally must be commenced. In general, any suit or action arising from any right of an insured under the policy must be commenced within two years after such right first arose for primary insurance and within three years for certain other policies, including certain Pool Mortgage Insurance policies. Although we believe that our Loss Mitigation Activities are justified under our policies, from time to time we face challenges from certain lender and servicer customers regarding our Loss Mitigation Activities. These challenges could result in additional arbitration or judicial proceedings and we may need to reassume the risk on, and increase loss reserves for, the associated policies or pay additional claims.
The legal and regulatory matters and proceedings discussed above could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, restitutions or other relief that could require significant expenditures or have other effects on our business.
Other
We provide contract underwriting as an outsourced service to our customers. Under our current contract underwriting program the remedy we offer is limited indemnification to our contract underwriting customers only with respect to those loans that we simultaneously underwrite for both secondary market compliance and for potential mortgage insurance eligibility. In 2019, payments for losses related to contract underwriting remedies were de minimis. In 2019, our provision for contract underwriting expenses was de minimis. We monitor this risk and negotiate our underwriting fee structure and recourse agreements on a client-by-client basis. We also routinely audit the performance of our contract underwriters.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Lease Liability
Our lease liability represents the present value of future lease payments over the lease term. Our leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate. Therefore, we must estimate our incremental borrowing rate, on a collateralized basis, to discount the lease payments based on information available at lease commencement. Our leases expire periodically through August 2032, and contain provisions for scheduled periodic rent increases. We estimate the incremental borrowing rate based on the yields of Radian Group corporate bonds, as adjusted to reflect a collateralized borrowing rate, resultsresulting in discount rates ranging from 4.22% to 7.08%. While the majority of our lease population expires within one year of one of the Radian Group corporate bonds, our more significant leases do not. For those leases, we adjust the corporate bond rate for both U.S. Department of the Treasury rate yields and a corporate spread adjustment determined from recent market data.
The following tables provide additional information related to our leases, including: (i) the components of our total lease cost; (ii) the cash flows arising from our lease transactions; (iii) supplemental balance sheet information; (iv) the weighted-average remaining lease term; (v) the weighted-average discount rate used for our leases; and (vi) the remaining maturities of our lease liabilities, as of and for the periods indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| ($ in thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Operating lease cost | | $ | 8,798 | | | $ | 9,332 | |
| Short-term lease cost | | 13 | | | 140 | |
| Total lease cost | | $ | 8,811 | | | $ | 9,472 | |
| | | | | |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | | | | |
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | | $ | (9,595) | | | $ | (10,615) | |
|
| | | |
| ($ in thousands) | Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| Operating lease cost | $ | 9,332 |
|
| Short-term lease cost | 140 |
|
| Total lease cost | $ | 9,472 |
|
| | |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | (10,615 | ) |
149
|
| | | |
| ($ in thousands) | December 31, 2019 |
Operating leases: (1) | |
Operating lease right-of-use assets (2) | $ | 37,866 |
|
Operating lease liabilities (3) | 59,452 |
|
| | |
| Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases (in years) | 10.2 years |
|
| | |
| Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases | 6.80 | % |
| | |
| Remaining maturities of lease liabilities for future years is as follows: | |
| 2020 | $ | 9,781 |
|
| 2021 | 9,299 |
|
| 2022 | 9,474 |
|
| 2023 | 9,594 |
|
| 2024 | 9,316 |
|
| 2025 and thereafter | 44,350 |
|
| Total lease payments | 91,814 |
|
| Less: Imputed interest | (32,362 | ) |
Present value of lease liabilities (3) | $ | 59,452 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities of $2.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively, are classified as held for sale and are excluded from the amounts in this disclosure. |
| |
(2) | Classified in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 9. |
| |
(3) | Classified in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| ($ in thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Operating leases: | | | | |
Operating lease right-of-use assets (1) | | $ | 32,985 | | | $ | 37,866 | |
Operating lease liabilities (2) | | 53,399 | | | 59,452 | |
| Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases (in years) | | 9.3 years | | 10.2 years |
| Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases | | 6.72 | % | | 6.80 | % |
| Remaining maturities of lease liabilities for future years is as follows: | | | | |
| 2021 | | $ | 8,330 | | | |
| 2022 | | 10,040 | | | |
| 2023 | | 10,170 | | | |
| 2024 | | 9,904 | | | |
| 2025 | | 7,976 | | | |
| 2026 and thereafter | | 39,870 | | | |
| Total lease payments | | 86,290 | | | |
| Less: Imputed interest | | (32,891) | | | |
Present value of lease liabilities (2) | | $ | 53,399 | | | |
(1)Classified in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 9.
(2)Classified in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Pursuant to the previous lease accounting standard, rent expense for
each of the
yearsyear ended December 31, 2018
and 2017 was $9.7
million and $5.7 million, respectively. Our commitment for non-cancelable leases in future years as of December 31, 2018, as disclosed in our 2018 Form 10-K, was as follows (in thousands): |
| | | |
| 2019 | $ | 11,310 |
|
| 2020 | 10,847 |
|
| 2021 | 10,165 |
|
| 2022 | 10,100 |
|
| 2023 | 10,251 |
|
| 2024 and thereafter | 56,317 |
|
| Total | $ | 108,990 |
|
million. At December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, there were 0 future minimum receipts expected from sublease rental payments.
We provide contract underwriting to our mortgage insurance customers. Generally, under our current contract underwriting program the remedy we offer is limited indemnification. In 2020, payments for losses related to contract underwriting remedies were de minimis. In 2020, our provision for contract underwriting expenses was also de minimis. We monitor this risk and negotiate our underwriting fee structure and recourse agreements on a client-by-client basis. We also routinely audit the performance of our contract underwriters.
14. Capital Stock
2019Share Repurchase Activity
On August 9, 2017, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program to spend up to $50 million to repurchase Radian Group common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, based on market and business conditions, stock price and other factors. Radian established a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act to implement the program. The Company completed this program during the first half of 2018 by purchasing 3,022,856 shares of Radian Group common stock at an average price of $16.56 per share, including commissions.
On August 16, 2018, Radian Group’s board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the Company to repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, based on market and business conditions, stock price and other factors. On March 20, 2019, Radian Group’s board of directors approved a $150 million increase in authorization for this program, bringing the total authorization to repurchase shares up to $250 million, excluding commissions. Radian operated this program pursuant to a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act which permitted the Company to purchase shares, according to the parameters in the plan, when it may have otherwise been precluded from doing so.implement this program. During 2019, the Company completed this program by purchasing 11,258,574 shares, at an average price of $22.22 per share, including commissions, which represents 5.3% of the shares outstanding at the beginning of the program. Asprogram, at an average price of December 31, 2019,$22.22 per share including commissions, at which time 0 further purchase authority remainsremained under this program.
On August 14, 2019, Radian Group’s board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizingthat authorized the Company to spend up to $200 million, excluding commissions, to repurchase Radian Group common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, based on market and business conditions, stock price and other factors. Radian operatesoperated this program pursuant to a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act, which permits the Company to purchase shares, at pre-determined price targets, when it may otherwise be precluded from doing so. DuringAct. Under this program during 2019, the Company purchased 2,195,661 shares at an average price of $22.79 per share, including commissions. As of December 31, 2019, purchase authority of up to $150.0 million remained available under this program.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
On February 13, 2020, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized a $275 million increase in this program, bringing the total authorization to repurchase shares up to $475 million, excluding commissions, and extended the expiration of this program extension from July 31, 2020 to August 31, 2021.
Subsequent to During the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, the Company purchased 2,738,46211,036,248 shares at an average price of its common stock$20.51, including commissions.
Effective March 19, 2020, the Company temporarily suspended purchases under its share repurchase program and canceled its then current 10b5-1 plan in response to uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Radian may initiate a new 10b5-1 plan at an average price of $24.03 per share, including commissions.its discretion in the future. As of February 25,December 31, 2020, purchase authority of up to $359.2$198.9 million remained available under this program.
2018 Activity
On August 9, 2017, Radian Group’s board The expiration date of directors authorized athe current share repurchase program to spend up to $50 million to repurchase Radian Group common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, based on market and business conditions, stock price and other factors. Radian established a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act to implement the program. The Company completed this program during the first half of 2018 by purchasing 3,022,856 shares of Radian Group common stock at an average price of $16.56 per share, including commissions.authorization remains August 31, 2021.
2017 Activity
On June 29, 2016, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program to spend up to $125 million to repurchase Radian Group common stock. In order to implement the program, Radian adopted a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act during the third quarter of 2016. During the second quarter of 2017, 380 shares were purchased at
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
an average price of $15.59 per share, which represented the only purchases made under the plan. This share repurchase program expired on June 30, 2017.
Other Purchases
We may purchase shares on the open market to settle stock options exercised by employees and purchases under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Through December 31, 2019, from time to time we also purchased shares on the open market to fund certain 401(k) matches. In addition, upon the vesting of certain restricted stock awards under our equity compensation plans, we may withhold from such vested awards shares of our common stock to satisfy the tax liability of the award recipients.
Dividends Paidand Dividend Equivalents
In each of the quarters during 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, we declared quarterly cash dividends on our common stock equal to $0.0025 per share. On February 13, 2020, Radian Group’s board of directors authorized an increase to the Company’s quarterly cash dividend from $0.0025 to $0.125 per share.share, which was declared and paid during each of the quarters in 2020.
Also beginning in first quarter of 2020, dividend equivalents are accrued on RSUs when dividends are declared on the Company’s common stock, subject to certain exclusions. See Note 17 for information about our dividend equivalents on RSU awards. 15. Share-BasedAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following tables show the rollforward of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2020 |
| (In thousands) | | Before Tax | | Tax Effect | | Net of Tax |
| Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 139,858 | | | $ | 29,370 | | | $ | 110,488 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period for which an allowance for expected credit losses has not been recognized | | 226,280 | | | 47,519 | | | 178,761 | |
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (1) | | | | | | |
| Net realized gains (losses) on disposals and non-credit related impairment losses | | 33,468 | | | 7,028 | | | 26,440 | |
| Net decrease (increase) in expected credit losses | | (1,254) | | | (263) | | | (991) | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | | 194,066 | | | 40,754 | | | 153,312 | |
| Other adjustments to comprehensive income, net | | (95) | | | (20) | | | (75) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | | 193,971 | | | 40,734 | | | 153,237 | |
| Balance at end of period | | $ | 333,829 | | | $ | 70,104 | | | $ | 263,725 | |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | | Before Tax | | Tax Effect | | Net of Tax |
| Balance at beginning of period | | $ | (77,114) | | | $ | (16,194) | | | $ | (60,920) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | | 228,406 | | | 47,965 | | | 180,441 | |
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (1) | | 11,262 | | | 2,365 | | | 8,897 | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | | 217,144 | | | 45,600 | | | 171,544 | |
| Other adjustments to comprehensive income, net | | (172) | | | (36) | | | (136) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | | 216,972 | | | 45,564 | | | 171,408 | |
| Balance at end of period | | $ | 139,858 | | | $ | 29,370 | | | $ | 110,488 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| (In thousands) | | Before Tax | | Tax Effect | | Net of Tax |
| Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 32,669 | | | $ | 9,584 | | | $ | 23,085 | |
| Cumulative effect of adopting accounting standard updates | | 284 | | | (2,664) | | | 2,948 | |
| Balance adjusted for cumulative effect of adopting accounting standard updates | | 32,953 | | | 6,920 | | | 26,033 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | | (123,235) | | | (25,879) | | | (97,356) | |
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (1) | | (13,000) | | | (2,730) | | | (10,270) | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | | (110,235) | | | (23,149) | | | (87,086) | |
| Other adjustments to comprehensive income, net | | 168 | | | 35 | | | 133 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | | (110,067) | | | (23,114) | | | (86,953) | |
| Balance at end of period | | $ | (77,114) | | | $ | (16,194) | | | $ | (60,920) | |
(1)Included in net gains (losses) on investments and Other Compensation Programsother financial instruments in our consolidated statements of operations.
On May 10, 2017,
16. Statutory Information
Radian Group serves as the holding company for our stockholdersinsurance subsidiaries, through which we conduct our mortgage insurance and title insurance businesses. These insurance subsidiaries are subject to comprehensive, detailed regulation by the insurance departments in the various states where our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled or licensed to transact business. Insurance laws vary from state to state, but generally grant broad supervisory powers to state agencies or officials to examine insurance companies and enforce rules or exercise discretion affecting almost every significant aspect of the insurance business, including the power to revoke or restrict an insurance company’s ability to write new business. In addition, in order to be eligible to insure loans purchased by the GSEs, mortgage insurers such as Radian Guaranty must meet the GSEs’ eligibility requirements, or PMIERs. The PMIERs are comprehensive, covering virtually all aspects of the business and operations of a private mortgage insurer, including internal risk management and quality controls, the relationship between the GSEs and the approved insurer, as well as the Amendedapproved insurer’s financial condition. See “PMIERs” below for additional information.
The PMIERs and Restated Equity Compensation Plan,state insurance regulations include various capital requirements and dividend restrictions based on our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory financial position and results of operations, as described below. Our failure to maintain adequate levels of capital could lead to intervention by the various insurance regulatory authorities, which amendedcould materially and restatedadversely affect our business, business prospects and financial condition.
Statutory Financial Statements
We prepare our statutory financial statements in accordance with the 2014 Equity Plan.accounting practices required or permitted, if applicable, by the insurance departments of the respective states of domicile of our insurance subsidiaries. Required SAP are
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
established by the NAIC, as well as state laws, regulations and general administrative rules. In addition, insurance departments have the right to permit other specific practices that may deviate from prescribed practices. As of December 31, 2020, we did not have any prescribed or permitted SAP that resulted in reported statutory surplus or risk-based capital being different from what would have been reported had NAIC statutory accounting practices been followed.
Reflecting the principal differences between SAP and GAAP, statutory financial statements typically do not include unrealized gains or losses on fixed-maturity securities, deferred policy acquisition costs, and certain net deferred tax assets and certain other less readily marketable assets that are designated as non-admitted assets. In addition to these general differences, SAP also requires that mortgage insurance companies establish a special contingency reserve equal to 50% of premiums earned in each year, generally to be maintained for 10 years, to protect policyholders against loss during adverse economic cycles. As a result of the Amendedrequirement to establish and Restated Equity Compensation Plan,maintain this statutory liability, contingency reserves affect the ability of a mortgage insurer to pay dividends, as described below. With regulatory approval, a mortgage insurance company may make early withdrawals from this contingency reserve when incurred losses exceed 35% of net premiums in a calendar year. Due to elevated losses in 2020, Radian Guaranty received regulatory approval to release $93.0 million from contingency reserves for the year. Radian Guaranty did not release any amounts from their contingency reserves in 2019 or 2018. Based on the typical 10-year holding requirement, Radian Guaranty is scheduled to release contingency reserves to unassigned surplus in material amounts beginning in 2024. See “—Statutory Dividend Restrictions” below for additional information.
As a mortgage guaranty insurer, we are eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations, related to amounts required to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves to the extent we purchase U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Under SAP, this deduction reduces the tax provision reflected in the statutory financial statements, which in turn increases statutory net income and surplus as well as Available Assets under the PMIERs. As of December 31, 2020, Radian Guaranty held $210.9 million of these bonds, which have a 10-year original maturity but may be redeemed in any tax year prior to maturity. If redeemed, the taxable income in the tax year of the redemption includes the previously deducted amount associated with the redeemed bond, and is subject to tax at the statutory tax rate applicable in the year of the redemption. Accordingly, if corporate income tax rates were to increase in a year subsequent to the tax year in which the deduction was taken, additional amounts of tax above what was paid originally for the bonds must be paid when those amounts are included in income in future years. If Radian Guaranty were to redeem its bonds early in anticipation of future corporate tax rate increases, its statutory surplus and PMIERs Available Assets would decline by the amount of the redemption only, which would be up to $210.9 million based on the amount held as of December 31, 2020. Under that scenario, Radian Guaranty would still remain in compliance with both minimum surplus requirements and the current PMIERs financial requirements, as described below.
All of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in Pennsylvania, and we currently write new business using 2 principal subsidiaries, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance. Radian Guaranty, our only approved insurer under the PMIERs, is authorized as a monoline insurer to write mortgage guaranty insurance (or in states where there is no specific authorization for mortgage guaranty insurance, the applicable line of insurance under which mortgage guaranty insurance is regulated) in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Guam. Radian Reinsurance is licensed only in Pennsylvania as a stock casualty insurance company authorized to carry on the business of credit insurance, which includes the authority to write direct mortgage guaranty insurance. We use Radian Reinsurance to participate in the credit risk transfer programs developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Prior to the January 2020 actions described below, we also used Radian Reinsurance to provide reinsurance to Radian Guaranty.
In January 2020, in connection with the termination of an intercompany reinsurance agreement between Radian Reinsurance and Radian Guaranty, Radian Reinsurance transferred $6.0 billion in RIF to Radian Guaranty and released substantially all of its contingency reserves to unassigned surplus. In turn, Radian Guaranty established equivalent contingency reserves with a corresponding decrease to its unassigned surplus. As part of these actions, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approved a $465 million return of capital from Radian Reinsurance to Radian Group as well as the transfer of $200 million of cash and marketable securities from Radian Group to Radian Guaranty in exchange for a surplus note. This intercompany surplus note has a 3% interest rate and a stated maturity of January 31, 2030; however, any principal or interest payments made by Radian Guaranty are subject to approval by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. To date, 0 payments have awards outstanding underbeen made related to this surplus note. The surplus note may be redeemed or converted to paid in capital at any time upon 30 days prior notice, subject to a request by Radian Guaranty for the approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Our mortgage insurance subsidiaries also include Radian Mortgage Assurance, Radian Insurance Inc., Radian Investor Surety Inc. and Radian Mortgage Guaranty Inc.
Additionally, as part of our 2008 Equity Plantitle services, we offer title insurance through Radian Title Insurance, an Ohio domiciled title insurance underwriter and 1995 Equity Plan.settlement services company that is licensed to issue title insurance policies in 39 states and the District of Columbia.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory net income and statutory policyholders’ surplus for the years ended and as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Statutory net income (loss) | | | | | | |
| Radian Guaranty | | $ | 441.9 | | | $ | 703.4 | | | $ | 501.9 | |
| Radian Reinsurance | | 32.5 | | | 101.6 | | | 86.1 | |
| Other Mortgage Subsidiaries | | 1.1 | | | 0.1 | | | (2.8) | |
| Radian Title Insurance | | 2.1 | | | 0.3 | | | (1.8) | |
| | | | | | |
| Statutory policyholders’ surplus | | | | | | |
| Radian Guaranty | | $ | 481.5 | | | $ | 637.7 | | | $ | 814.1 | |
| Radian Reinsurance | | 360.7 | | | 455.6 | | | 356.2 | |
| Other Mortgage Subsidiaries | | 41.3 | | | 45.7 | | | 58.0 | |
| Radian Title Insurance | | 28.8 | | | 27.0 | | | 27.0 | |
Statutory Capital Requirements
Under state insurance regulations, Radian Guaranty is required to maintain minimum surplus levels and, in certain states, a maximum ratio of net RIF relative to statutory capital, or Risk-to-capital. There are 16 RBC States that currently impose a Statutory RBC Requirement. The last awards granted pursuantmost common Statutory RBC Requirement is that a mortgage insurer’s Risk-to-capital may not exceed 25 to 1. In certain of the RBC States, a mortgage insurer must satisfy a MPP Requirement. Unless an RBC State grants a waiver or other form of relief, if a mortgage insurer, such as Radian Guaranty, is not in compliance with the Statutory RBC Requirement of that state, the mortgage insurer may be prohibited from writing new mortgage insurance business in that state. The statutory capital requirements for the non-RBC States are de minimis (ranging from $1 million to $5 million); however, the insurance laws of these states generally grant broad supervisory powers to state agencies or officials to enforce rules or exercise discretion affecting almost every significant aspect of the insurance business, including the power to revoke or restrict an insurance company’s ability to write new business. Radian Guaranty’s domiciliary state, Pennsylvania, is not one of the RBC States.
Radian Guaranty was in compliance with all applicable Statutory RBC Requirements or MPP Requirements, as applicable, in each of the RBC States as of December 31, 2020. Radian Guaranty’s Risk-to-capital calculation was 12.7:1 and 13.6:1 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. For purposes of the Risk-to-capital requirements imposed by certain states, statutory capital is defined as the sum of statutory policyholders’ surplus plus statutory contingency reserves.
Our other mortgage insurance and title insurance subsidiaries were also in compliance with all statutory and counterparty capital requirements as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The NAIC is in the process of reviewing the minimum capital and surplus requirements for mortgage insurers and considering changes to the 2008 Equity PlanModel Act. In December 2019, a working group of state regulators released exposure drafts of a revised Model Act, including new proposed mortgage guaranty insurance capital requirements for mortgage insurers. While the process for developing this framework was inactive as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we understand the initiative remains active and 1995 Equity Plan werethat an effort to resume work on the exposure draft is expected in 2021. As proposed, the capital requirements set forth in the most recent exposure draft rely on, among other things, changes in the economic and housing environment, including changes in home prices and incomes.
PMIERs
The PMIERs financial requirements require that a mortgage insurer’s Available Assets meet or exceed its Minimum Required Assets. At December 31, 2020, Radian Guaranty is an approved mortgage insurer under the PMIERs and is in compliance with the current PMIERs financial requirements.
Under the PMIERs there are increased financial requirements for loans in default, including as a result of natural disasters and pandemics. As a result, increases in defaults related to the COVID-19 pandemic have subjected Radian Guaranty to an increase in Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs, and therefore, could impact our compliance with the PMIERs or continue to negatively impact our results of operations. However, as further described below, the PMIERs apply a multiplier that reduces the Minimum Required Asset factor for loans that have become non-performing as a result of a “FEMA Declared Major
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Disaster” event, including as a result of participation in a forbearance program, because those loans generally have a higher likelihood of curing following the conclusion of the event. For these defaults, the PMIERs apply the Disaster Related Capital Charge, which is a 0.30 multiplier to the factor that normally would be applied to such default, effectively reducing the required asset amount by 70%, unless the resulting Minimum Required Asset amount after applying the Disaster Related Capital Charge would be less than the Minimum Required Asset amount for the loan if it was performing, in which case the Minimum Required Asset amount would equal the performing level amount. Pursuant to the COVID-19 Amendment, the Disaster Related Capital Charge is now applied nationwide to all COVID-19 Defaulted Loans for no longer than three calendar months beginning with the month the loan becomes non-performing (i.e., missed 2 monthly payments), or if greater, the period of time that the loan is subject to a forbearance plan, repayment plan or loan modification trial period granted in 2014response to a financial hardship related to COVID-19. See Note 1 for discussion about the elevated risks and 2008,uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
The GSEs may amend the PMIERs at any time, and they have broad discretion to interpret the requirements, which could impact the calculation of Radian Guaranty’s Available Assets and/or Minimum Required Assets. In addition, the GSEs have a broad range of consent rights under the PMIERs and require private mortgage insurers to obtain the prior consent of the GSEs before taking certain actions. If Radian Guaranty is unable to satisfy the requirements set forth in the PMIERs, the GSEs could restrict it from conducting certain types of business with them or take actions that may include not purchasing loans insured by Radian Guaranty.
Statutory Dividend Restrictions
As of December 31, 2020, the amount of restricted net assets held by our consolidated insurance subsidiaries (which represents our equity investment in those insurance subsidiaries) totaled $4.1 billion of our consolidated net assets. Despite holding assets above the minimum statutory capital thresholds and PMIERs financial requirements, the ability of Radian’s mortgage insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends on their common stock is restricted by certain provisions of the insurance laws of Pennsylvania, their state of domicile. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, ordinary dividends and distributions may only be paid out of an insurer’s positive unassigned surplus, measured as of the end of the prior fiscal year, unless the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approves the payment of extraordinary dividends or other distributions from another source.
As of December 31, 2020, Radian Guaranty had negative unassigned surplus of $859.5 million. Therefore, 0 dividends or other ordinary distributions can be paid by Radian Guaranty in 2021. In light of Radian Guaranty’s negative unassigned surplus related to operating losses in prior periods and the ongoing need to set aside contingency reserves, we do not anticipate that Radian Guaranty will be permitted under applicable insurance laws to pay ordinary dividends to Radian Group for the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2020, Radian Reinsurance had positive unassigned surplus of $319.7 million. As a result, Radian Reinsurance does have the ability to pay an ordinary dividend in 2021. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, Radian Reinsurance can distribute up to $36.1 million in 2021 without prior approval from the Pennsylvania Insurance Department.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, Radian Guaranty had contingency reserves of $3.4 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. As discussed above, absent early releases related to elevated incurred losses such as occurred in 2020, Radian Guaranty is scheduled to release contingency reserves to unassigned surplus in material amounts beginning in 2024, which should accelerate the reduction of its negative unassigned surplus. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, an insurer may request approval to pay an Extraordinary Distribution, subject to the approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Radian Guaranty sought and received such approval to return capital by paying Extraordinary Distributions to Radian Group in 2019 and 2018. As described above, Radian Reinsurance sought and received approval to return capital by paying an Extraordinary Distribution to Radian Group in January 2020.
The surplus additions (distributions) between Radian Group and Radian Guaranty and our other insurance subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Additions to Radian Guaranty surplus | | $ | 200.0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Distributions from Radian Guaranty surplus | | 0 | | | (375.0) | | | (450.0) | |
| Additions to other insurance subsidiaries’ surplus | | 0 | | | 65.2 | | | 0 | |
| Distributions from other insurance subsidiaries’ surplus | | (465.0) | | | (14.0) | | | 0 | |
17. Share-Based Compensation and Other Benefit Programs
All outstanding awards granted under the Equity Plans have beenare performance-based or time-based awards in the form of RSUs, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, RSUs,or phantom stock, or stock appreciation rights.stock. The maximum contractual term for stock options and similar instruments under the Equity Plans is 10 years, although awards of these instruments may be granted with shorter terms.
The Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan authorizes the issuance
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to 8,954,109 shares, plus such number of shares of common stock that were subject to awards outstanding under the 2014 Equity Plan and the 2008 Equity Plan prior to the effective date of the Amended and Restated Equity Plan that subsequently terminate, expire or are cancelled and become available for issuance under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan (“Prior Plan Shares”). Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
There were 6,266,0173,478,075 shares available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan as of December 31, 20192020 (the “share reserve”), which includes Prior Plan Shares.. Each grant of restricted stock, RSUs, or performance share awards under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan (other than those settled in cash) reduces the share reserve available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan by 1.31 shares for every share subject to such grant. Absent this share reserve adjustment for outstanding restricted stock, RSUs, phantom stock or performance share awards, our shares remaining available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan would have been 9,678,7238,050,843 shares as of December 31, 2019. Awards under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan that provide for settlement solely in cash (and not common shares) do not count against the share reserve.2020.
Most awards vest at the end of the performance or service period and will vest earlier under certain circumstances. In the event of a grantee’s death or disability, awards generally vest immediately. Upon retirement, if certain conditions are met, awards generally vest immediately or at the end of the performance period, if any. Certain time-based RSU awards granted to officers under our Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan will vest in whole or in part in the event the grantee’s employment is terminated by us without cause or for “good reason.” Awards granted under the Equity Plans to officers and our non-employee directors provide for “double trigger” vesting in the event of a change of control. As a result, awards granted to officers will vest in connection with a change of control only in the event the grantee’s employment is terminated by us without cause or the grantee terminates employment for “good reason,” in each case within 90 days before or one year after the change of control. Awards to our non-employee directors will vest in connection with a change of control only in the event the grantee fails to be appointed to the board of directors of the surviving entity or is not nominated for reelection, or fails to be reelected after nomination, to the board of directors of the Company or the surviving entity, in each case at any time beginning upon the change of control and ending 90 days following the first meeting of the stockholders of the Company or the surviving entity after the change in control. In the event of a hypothetical change of control as of December 31, 2019, we estimate that the vesting of awards, assuming for purposes of this hypothetical that “double trigger” vesting occurred, would have resulted in a pretax accounting charge to us of approximately $21.4 million, representing the acceleration of compensation expense.
We use the Monte Carlo valuation model to determine the fair value of all cash-settled awards where stock price is a factor in determining the vesting, as well as for cash- or equity-settled performance awards where there exists a similar stock price-based market condition. The Monte Carlo valuation model incorporates multiple input variables, including expected life,
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
volatility, risk-free rate of return and dividend yield for each award to estimate the probability that a vesting condition will be achieved. In determining these assumptions for the Monte Carlo valuations, we consider historic and observable market data.entity.
The following table summarizes the compensation cost recognized and additional information regarding all share-based awards for the years indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Compensation cost recognized: (1) | | | | | | |
| RSUs | | $ | 18,403 | | | $ | 20,694 | | | $ | 16,591 | |
| Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | 671 | | | 444 | | | 453 | |
| Non-Qualified Stock Options and Other | | 119 | | | 276 | | | 605 | |
| Total compensation cost recognized | | 19,193 | | | 21,414 | | | 17,649 | |
| Less: Costs deferred as acquisition costs | | 0 | | | 373 | | | 324 | |
| Share-based compensation expense | | 19,193 | | | 21,041 | | | 17,325 | |
| Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense | | 4,264 | | | 6,343 | | | 2,863 | |
| Share-based compensation expense, net | | $ | 14,929 | | | $ | 14,698 | | | $ | 14,462 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Compensation cost recognized (1): | | | | | |
| RSUs | $ | 20,694 |
| | $ | 16,591 |
| | $ | 12,207 |
|
| Non-Qualified Stock Options | 274 |
| | 603 |
| | 851 |
|
| Phantom Stock | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
|
| Employee Stock Purchase Plan | 444 |
| | 453 |
| | 432 |
|
| Total compensation cost recognized | 21,414 |
| | 17,649 |
| | 13,492 |
|
| Less: Costs deferred as acquisition costs | 373 |
| | 324 |
| | 269 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 21,041 |
| | $ | 17,325 |
| | $ | 13,223 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Compensation cost is generally recognized over the periods that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. For purposes of calculating compensation cost recognized, we generally consider awards effectively vested (and we recognize the full compensation costs) when grantees become retirement eligible. |
As of December 31, 2019,2020, unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion offor all of our outstanding share-based awards was $24.8$22.7 million. Absent a change of control under the Equity Plans, this expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.9 years. The ultimate unrecognized expense associated with our outstanding awards could differ, depending upon whether or not the performance and service conditions are met.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
RSUs
Information with regard to RSUs to be settled in stock for the periods indicated is as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Performance-Based | | Time-Vested |
| | Number of
Shares | | Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | Number of
Shares | | Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value |
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 (1) | | 2,375,005 | | | $ | 15.84 | | | 1,869,740 | | | $ | 13.82 | |
Granted (2) | | 839,330 | | | 11.91 | | | 763,608 | | | 13.49 | |
Performance adjustment (3) | | 168,749 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Vested (4) | | (1,174,535) | | | 13.14 | | | (501,283) | | | 15.98 | |
| Forfeited | | (22,305) | | | 18.69 | | | (13,180) | | | 17.61 | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2020 (1) | | 2,186,244 | | | 15.71 | | | 2,118,885 | | | 13.16 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Performance-Based | | Time-Vested |
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Number of Shares | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Unvested, December 31, 2018 (1) | 2,692,949 |
| | $ | 14.32 |
| | 704,062 |
| | $ | 16.51 |
|
Granted (2) | 656,854 |
| | $ | 21.45 |
| | 380,568 |
| | $ | 22.76 |
|
Performance adjustment (3) | 400,757 |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Vested (4) | (1,246,824 | ) | | $ | 8.43 |
| | (368,325 | ) | | $ | 16.81 |
|
| Forfeited | (55,389 | ) | | $ | 17.81 |
| | (18,729 | ) | | $ | 18.31 |
|
Unvested, December 31, 2019 (1) | 2,448,347 |
| | $ | 17.03 |
| | 697,576 |
| | $ | 19.72 |
|
______________________(2)For performance-based RSUs, amount represents the number of target shares at grant date.
| |
(1) | The final amount of RSUs distributed depends on the level of performance achieved along with each employee’s continued service through the vest date, which could result in changes in vested RSUs. |
| |
(2) | For performance-based RSUs, amount represents the probable outcome at grant date. |
| |
(3) | Represents an adjustment to the number of unvested performance-based RSUs due to changes during the period in our estimated payouts, which can range from 0 to 200% of target depending on results over the applicable performance periods. |
| |
(4) | Represents amounts vested during the year, which can include both original shares granted and the impact of performance adjustments. |
(3)For performance-based RSUs, represents the difference between the number of target shares at grant date and the number of shares vested at settlement, which can range from 0 to 200% of target depending on results over the applicable performance periods.
(4)Represents amounts vested during the year, including the impact of performance adjustments for performance-based awards.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of performance-based RSUs granted during 2019 and 2018 was $21.45 and 2017$15.07, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of time-vested RSUs granted during 2019 and 2018 was $15.43$22.76 and $16.60,$16.24, respectively.
The fair value as of the respective vesting dates of performance-based RSUs vested during 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $17.2 million, $10.6 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. The fair value as of the respective vesting dates of time-vested RSUs vested during 2020, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 was $36.2$7.6 million, $3.3$10.9 million, and $1.4$4.2 million, respectively.
Radian Group Inc.
NotesGroup’s board of directors approved the amendment of outstanding performance-based RSU awards and time-based RSU awards held by eligible employees (including former employees) and directors of the Company to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Performance-Based RSUs.In 2019, 2018 and 2017, executive and non-executive officers were granted performance-based RSUs to be settled in common stock with target awards totaling 486,540, 595,320, and 456,510 RSUs, respectively. The maximum payout at the end of the three-year performance period is 200% of a grantee’s target number of RSUs. The maximum payout for awards based on the TSR Measures described below is generally subject to a maximum cap of 6 times the value of the grantee’s target award on the grant date. Performance-based RSUs granted to executive officers are subject to a one-year post vesting holding period.
In2020, 2019 and 2018, the vesting of the performance-based RSUs granted to each executive officer and non-executive will be based upon the cumulative growth in Radian’s book value per share, adjusted for certain defined items, over a three-yearthree-year performance period. In 2017, approximately 50%The maximum payout at the end of the performance-basedthree-year performance period is 200% of the award’s target number of RSUs. Performance-based RSUs granted to each executive and non-executive officer will vest based on the cumulative growth in Radian book value per share, adjusted for certain defined items over a three-year period. The vesting of the remaining 50% of each performance-based RSU granted in 2017 is dependent upon: (i) Radian Group’s total stockholder return (“TSR”) compared to the median TSR of a designated peer group of companies as of the date of grant and (ii) Radian Group’s absolute TSR, in each case measured over a three-year performance period andofficers are subject to certain conditions.a one-year post vesting holding period.
The grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs that are based on the cumulative growth in Radian’s book value per share is calculated based on the stock price as of the grant date, discounted for executives for the one-yearone-year post-vesting holding period. The compensation cost that is recognized over the remaining requisite service period is based on our expectations of the probable level of achievement of the performance condition.
Time-Vested RSUs.With the exception of certain time-vested RSUs granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 to non-employee directors, the time-vested RSU awards granted in 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 are scheduled to vest in: (i) pro rata installments on each of the first 3 anniversaries of the grant date or (ii) generally at the end of three years. Certain time-vested RSU awards granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 to non-employee directors generally are subject to one-yearone-year cliff vesting.vesting; however, those awards, as well as awards granted to non-employee directors in earlier periods, remain outstanding and the shares are not issued until the non-employee director retires or certain conditions related to a change in control are met, as described above.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Non-Qualified Stock Options
Information with regard to stock options for the periods indicated is as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | | Number of
Shares | | Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share | | Weighted
Average
Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) |
| Outstanding, December 31, 2019 | | 981,547 | | | $ | 10.05 | | | | | |
| Granted | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Exercised | | (207,598) | | | 7.50 | | | | | |
| Forfeited | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Expired | | (430) | | | 18.42 | | | | | |
| Outstanding, December 31, 2020 | | 773,519 | | | $ | 10.73 | | | 3.2 | | $ | 7,366 | |
| Exercisable, December 31, 2020 | | 773,519 | | | $ | 10.73 | | | 3.2 | | $ | 7,366 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) |
| Outstanding, December 31, 2018 | 1,312,791 |
| | $ | 9.39 |
| | | | |
| Granted | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Exercised | (329,900 | ) | | 7.41 |
| | | | |
| Forfeited | (1,344 | ) | | 12.25 |
| | | | |
| Expired | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Outstanding, December 31, 2019 | 981,547 |
| | 10.05 |
| | 4.0 | | $ | 14,833 |
|
| Exercisable, December 31, 2019 | 853,041 |
| | $ | 9.73 |
| | 3.7 | | $ | 13,163 |
|
| Available for grant, December 31, 2019 | 6,266,017 |
| | | | | | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Based on the market price of $25.16 at December 31, 2019. |
The following table summarizes additional information concerning stock option activity for the periods indicated:indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised | | $ | 3,344 | | | $ | 4,984 | | | $ | 6,274 | |
| Tax benefit of options exercised | | 702 | | | 1,047 | | | 1,318 | |
| Cash received from options exercised | | 1,553 | | | 2,416 | | | 1,425 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised | $ | 4,984 |
| | $ | 6,274 |
| | $ | 14,389 |
|
| Tax benefit of options exercised | 1,047 |
| | 1,318 |
| | 5,036 |
|
| Cash received from options exercised | 2,416 |
| | 1,425 |
| | 7,131 |
|
Upon the exercise of stock options, we generally issue shares from the authorized, unissued share reserves when the exercise price is less than the treasury stock repurchase price and from treasury stock when the exercise price is greater than the treasury stock repurchase price.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable |
| Range of Exercise Prices | Number Outstanding | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Number Exercisable | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| $2.45 - $3.58 | 377,117 |
| | 2.4 | | $ | 2.45 |
| | 377,117 |
| | $ | 2.45 |
|
| $10.42 - $15.44 | 449,976 |
| | 4.9 | | $ | 13.54 |
| | 321,470 |
| | $ | 14.09 |
|
| $18.42 | 154,454 |
| | 5.3 | | $ | 18.42 |
| | 154,454 |
| | $ | 18.42 |
|
| | 981,547 |
| | 4.0 | | $ | 10.05 |
| | 853,041 |
| | $ | 9.73 |
|
Generally, the stock option awards have a four-yearfour-year vesting period, with 50% of the award vesting on or after the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% of the award vesting on or after the fourth anniversary of the grant date, provided the applicable stock price performance hurdle is met. The fair value of stock options vested during the year ended December 31, 2019 was $30 thousand, as compared to $1.3 million in 2018 and $3.3 million in 2017.
There were 0 stock options granted in 2017, 20182020, 2019 and 2019.2018.
Employee Stock Purchase PlanStatutory Financial Statements
On May 9, 2018, stockholdersWe prepare our statutory financial statements in accordance with the accounting practices required or permitted, if applicable, by the insurance departments of Radian approved the Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP, which amended and restated the Radian Group Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under this plan, we issued 107,009; 103,668; and 105,476 shares to employees during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and when amended in 2018, an additional 1,250,000 sharesrespective states of domicile of our authorized but unissued common stock were reserved for issuance. In January 2020, we issued 39,332 shares from the shares available for issuance under our Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP. As a result, 1,902,459 shares currently remain available for issuance under the Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP.
The Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP is designed to allow eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount of 15% off the lower of the fair market value of our common stock at the beginning or end of a six-month offering period (each period being the first and second six months in a calendar year).
The following assumptions were used in our calculation of Employee Stock Purchase Plan compensation expense during 2019:insurance subsidiaries. Required SAP are
|
| | | | | |
| | January 1, 2019 | | July 1, 2019 |
| Expected life | 6 months |
| | 6 months |
|
| Risk-free interest rate | 2.76 | % | | 2.18 | % |
| Volatility | 36.24 | % | | 27.90 | % |
| Dividend yield | 0.06 | % | | 0.04 | % |
152
16. Benefit Plans
The Radian Group Inc. Savings Incentive Plan (“Savings Plan”) covers substantially all of our full-time and our part-time employees. Participants can contribute up to 100% of their base earnings as pretax and/or after-tax (Roth IRA) contributions up to a maximum amount of $19,000 for 2019. The Savings Plan also includes a catch-up contribution provision whereby participants who are or will be age 50 and above during the Savings Plan year may contribute an additional contribution. The maximum catch-up contribution for the Savings Plan in 2019 was $6,000. We match up to 100% of the first 6.0% of base earnings contributed in any given year. Our expense for matching funds for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $5.6 million, $6.1 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
Certain of the benefits of this plan are as follows:
allows for the immediate eligibility of new hire participation and provides for the automatic enrollment of eligible employees;
provides for the immediate vesting of matching contributions (including existing unvested matching contributions attributable to prior periods) and the elimination of all restrictions (other than Radian Group’s Insider Trading Policy) on a participant’s ability to diversify his/her position in matching contributions; and
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
permitsReflecting the principal differences between SAP and GAAP, statutory financial statements typically do not include unrealized gains or losses on fixed-maturity securities, deferred policy acquisition costs, and certain net deferred tax assets and certain other less readily marketable assets that are designated as non-admitted assets. In addition to these general differences, SAP also requires that mortgage insurance companies establish a special contingency reserve equal to 50% of premiums earned in each year, generally to be maintained for 10 years, to protect policyholders against loss during adverse economic cycles. As a result of the requirement to establish and maintain this statutory liability, contingency reserves affect the ability of a mortgage insurer to pay dividends, as described below. With regulatory approval, a mortgage insurance company may make early withdrawals from this contingency reserve when incurred losses exceed 35% of net premiums in a calendar year. Due to elevated losses in 2020, Radian Guaranty received regulatory approval to release $93.0 million from contingency reserves for the year. Radian Guaranty did not release any amounts from their contingency reserves in 2019 or 2018. Based on the typical 10-year holding requirement, Radian Guaranty is scheduled to release contingency reserves to unassigned surplus in material amounts beginning in 2024. See “—Statutory Dividend Restrictions” below for additional information.
As a mortgage guaranty insurer, we are eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations, related to amounts required to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves to the extent we purchase U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Under SAP, this deduction reduces the tax provision reflected in the statutory financial statements, which in turn increases statutory net income and surplus as well as Available Assets under the PMIERs. As of December 31, 2020, Radian Guaranty held $210.9 million of these bonds, which have a 10-year original maturity but may be redeemed in any tax year prior to maturity. If redeemed, the taxable income in the tax year of the redemption includes the previously deducted amount associated with the redeemed bond, and is subject to tax at the statutory tax rate applicable in the year of the redemption. Accordingly, if corporate income tax rates were to increase in a year subsequent to the tax year in which the deduction was taken, additional amounts of tax above what was paid originally for the bonds must be paid when those amounts are included in income in future years. If Radian Guaranty were to redeem its bonds early in anticipation of future corporate tax rate increases, its statutory surplus and PMIERs Available Assets would decline by the amount of the redemption only, which would be up to $210.9 million based on the amount held as of December 31, 2020. Under that scenario, Radian Guaranty would still remain in compliance with both minimum surplus requirements and the current PMIERs financial requirements, as described below.
All of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in Pennsylvania, and we currently write new business using 2 principal subsidiaries, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance. Radian Guaranty, our only approved insurer under the PMIERs, is authorized as a monoline insurer to write mortgage guaranty insurance (or in states where there is no specific authorization for mortgage guaranty insurance, the applicable line of insurance under which mortgage guaranty insurance is regulated) in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Guam. Radian Reinsurance is licensed only in Pennsylvania as a stock casualty insurance company authorized to carry on the business of credit insurance, which includes the authority to write direct mortgage guaranty insurance. We use Radian Reinsurance to participate in the credit risk transfer programs developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Prior to the January 2020 actions described below, we also used Radian Reinsurance to provide reinsurance to Radian Guaranty.
In January 2020, in connection with the termination of an intercompany reinsurance agreement between Radian Reinsurance and Radian Guaranty, Radian Reinsurance transferred $6.0 billion in RIF to Radian Guaranty and released substantially all of its contingency reserves to unassigned surplus. In turn, Radian Guaranty established equivalent contingency reserves with a corresponding decrease to its unassigned surplus. As part of these actions, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approved a $465 million return of capital from Radian Reinsurance to Radian Group as well as the transfer of $200 million of cash and marketable securities from Radian Group to make discretionary, pro rata (based on eligible pay) cash allocationsRadian Guaranty in exchange for a surplus note. This intercompany surplus note has a 3% interest rate and a stated maturity of January 31, 2030; however, any principal or interest payments made by Radian Guaranty are subject to each eligible participant’s account, with vestingapproval by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. To date, 0 payments have been made related to this surplus note. The surplus note may be redeemed or converted to paid in capital at any time upon completion of three years of service with us.
17. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table shows30 days prior notice, subject to a request by Radian Guaranty for the rollforward of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) asapproval of the periods indicated:Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Our mortgage insurance subsidiaries also include Radian Mortgage Assurance, Radian Insurance Inc., Radian Investor Surety Inc. and Radian Mortgage Guaranty Inc.
Additionally, as part of our title services, we offer title insurance through Radian Title Insurance, an Ohio domiciled title insurance underwriter and settlement services company that is licensed to issue title insurance policies in 39 states and the District of Columbia.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| (In thousands) | Before Tax | | Tax Effect | | Net of Tax |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | (77,114 | ) | | $ | (16,194 | ) | | $ | (60,920 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”): | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | 228,406 |
| | 47,965 |
| | 180,441 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (1) | 11,262 |
| | 2,365 |
| | 8,897 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | 217,144 |
| | 45,600 |
| | 171,544 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for liquidation of foreign subsidiary and other adjustments included in net income (2) | 4 |
| | 1 |
| | 3 |
|
| Net foreign currency translation adjustments | (4 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (3 | ) |
| Net actuarial gains (losses) | (168 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (133 | ) |
| OCI | 216,972 |
| | 45,564 |
| | 171,408 |
|
| Balance at end of period | $ | 139,858 |
| | $ | 29,370 |
| | $ | 110,488 |
|
| | | | | | |
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Statutory net income (loss) | | | | | | |
| Radian Guaranty | | $ | 441.9 | | | $ | 703.4 | | | $ | 501.9 | |
| Radian Reinsurance | | 32.5 | | | 101.6 | | | 86.1 | |
| Other Mortgage Subsidiaries | | 1.1 | | | 0.1 | | | (2.8) | |
| Radian Title Insurance | | 2.1 | | | 0.3 | | | (1.8) | |
| | | | | | |
| Statutory policyholders’ surplus | | | | | | |
| Radian Guaranty | | $ | 481.5 | | | $ | 637.7 | | | $ | 814.1 | |
| Radian Reinsurance | | 360.7 | | | 455.6 | | | 356.2 | |
| Other Mortgage Subsidiaries | | 41.3 | | | 45.7 | | | 58.0 | |
| Radian Title Insurance | | 28.8 | | | 27.0 | | | 27.0 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| (In thousands) | Before Tax | | Tax Effect | | Net of Tax |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 32,669 |
| | $ | 9,584 |
| | $ | 23,085 |
|
| Cumulative effect of adopting accounting standard updates | 284 |
| | (2,664 | ) | | 2,948 |
|
| Balance adjusted for cumulative effect of adopting accounting standard updates | 32,953 |
| | 6,920 |
| | 26,033 |
|
| OCI: | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | (123,235 | ) | | (25,879 | ) | | (97,356 | ) |
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (1) | (13,000 | ) | | (2,730 | ) | | (10,270 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | (110,235 | ) | | (23,149 | ) | | (87,086 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments | 5 |
| | 1 |
| | 4 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for liquidation of foreign subsidiary and other adjustments included in net income (2) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net foreign currency translation adjustments | 5 |
| | 1 |
| | 4 |
|
| Net actuarial gains (losses) | 163 |
| | 34 |
| | 129 |
|
| OCI | (110,067 | ) | | (23,114 | ) | | (86,953 | ) |
| Balance at end of period | $ | (77,114 | ) | | $ | (16,194 | ) | | $ | (60,920 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Before Tax | | Tax Effect | | Net of Tax |
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | (19,063 | ) | | $ | (6,668 | ) | | $ | (12,395 | ) |
| OCI: | | | | | |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on investments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | 46,235 |
| | 14,332 |
| | 31,903 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains (losses) included in net income (1) | (4,065 | ) | | (1,423 | ) | | (2,642 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | 50,300 |
| | 15,755 |
| | 34,545 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustments: | | | | | |
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments | 225 |
| | 75 |
| | 150 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for liquidation of foreign subsidiary and other adjustments included in net income (2) | (1,109 | ) | | (388 | ) | | (721 | ) |
| Net foreign currency translation adjustments | 1,334 |
| | 463 |
| | 871 |
|
| Net actuarial gains (losses) | 98 |
| | 34 |
| | 64 |
|
| OCI | 51,732 |
| | 16,252 |
| | 35,480 |
|
| Balance at end of period | $ | 32,669 |
| | $ | 9,584 |
| | $ | 23,085 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Included in net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments in our consolidated statements of operations. |
| |
(2) | Included in restructuring and other exit costs in our consolidated statements of operations. |
net RIF relative to statutory capital, or Risk-to-capital. There are 16 RBC States that currently impose a Statutory RBC Requirement. The most common Statutory RBC Requirement is that a mortgage insurer’s Risk-to-capital may not exceed 25 to 1. In certain of the RBC States, a mortgage insurer must satisfy a MPP Requirement. Unless an RBC State grants a waiver or other form of relief, if a mortgage insurer, such as Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
18.Guaranty, is not in compliance with the Statutory Information
Radian Group serves asRBC Requirement of that state, the holding company for our insurance subsidiaries, through which we conduct ourmortgage insurer may be prohibited from writing new mortgage insurance and title insurance businesses. These insurance subsidiariesbusiness in that state. The statutory capital requirements for the non-RBC States are subjectde minimis (ranging from $1 million to comprehensive, detailed regulation by$5 million); however, the insurance departments in the variouslaws of these states where our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled or licensed to transact business. Insurance laws vary from state to state, but generally grant broad supervisory powers to state agencies or officials to examine insurance companies and enforce rules or exercise discretion affecting almost every significant aspect of the insurance business, including the power to revoke or restrict an insurance company’s ability to write new business. Radian Guaranty’s domiciliary state, Pennsylvania, is not one of the RBC States.
Radian Guaranty was in compliance with all applicable Statutory RBC Requirements or MPP Requirements, as applicable, in each of the RBC States as of December 31, 2020. Radian Guaranty’s Risk-to-capital calculation was 12.7:1 and 13.6:1 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. For purposes of the Risk-to-capital requirements imposed by certain states, statutory capital is defined as the sum of statutory policyholders’ surplus plus statutory contingency reserves.
Our other mortgage insurance and title insurance subsidiaries were also in compliance with all statutory and counterparty capital requirements as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The NAIC is in the process of reviewing the minimum capital and surplus requirements for mortgage insurers and considering changes to the Model Act. In December 2019, a working group of state regulators released exposure drafts of a revised Model Act, including new proposed mortgage guaranty insurance capital requirements for mortgage insurers. While the process for developing this framework was inactive as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we understand the initiative remains active and that an effort to resume work on the exposure draft is expected in 2021. As proposed, the capital requirements set forth in the most recent exposure draft rely on, among other things, changes in the economic and housing environment, including changes in home prices and incomes.
PMIERs
The PMIERs financial requirements require that a mortgage insurer’s Available Assets meet or exceed its Minimum Required Assets. At December 31, 2020, Radian Guaranty is an approved mortgage insurer under the PMIERs and is in compliance with the current PMIERs financial requirements.
Under the PMIERs there are increased financial requirements for loans in default, including as a result of natural disasters and pandemics. As a result, increases in defaults related to the COVID-19 pandemic have subjected Radian Guaranty to an increase in Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs, and therefore, could impact our compliance with the PMIERs or continue to negatively impact our results of operations. However, as further described below, the PMIERs apply a multiplier that reduces the Minimum Required Asset factor for loans that have become non-performing as a result of a “FEMA Declared Major
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Disaster” event, including as a result of participation in a forbearance program, because those loans generally have a higher likelihood of curing following the conclusion of the event. For these defaults, the PMIERs apply the Disaster Related Capital Charge, which is a 0.30 multiplier to the factor that normally would be applied to such default, effectively reducing the required asset amount by 70%, unless the resulting Minimum Required Asset amount after applying the Disaster Related Capital Charge would be less than the Minimum Required Asset amount for the loan if it was performing, in which case the Minimum Required Asset amount would equal the performing level amount. Pursuant to the COVID-19 Amendment, the Disaster Related Capital Charge is now applied nationwide to all COVID-19 Defaulted Loans for no longer than three calendar months beginning with the month the loan becomes non-performing (i.e., missed 2 monthly payments), or if greater, the period of time that the loan is subject to a forbearance plan, repayment plan or loan modification trial period granted in response to a financial hardship related to COVID-19. See Note 1 for discussion about the elevated risks and uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
The GSEs may amend the PMIERs at any time, and they have broad discretion to interpret the requirements, which could impact the calculation of Radian Guaranty’s Available Assets and/or Minimum Required Assets. In addition, the GSEs have a broad range of consent rights under the PMIERs and require private mortgage insurers to obtain the prior consent of the GSEs before taking certain actions. If Radian Guaranty is unable to satisfy the requirements set forth in orderthe PMIERs, the GSEs could restrict it from conducting certain types of business with them or take actions that may include not purchasing loans insured by Radian Guaranty.
Statutory Dividend Restrictions
As of December 31, 2020, the amount of restricted net assets held by our consolidated insurance subsidiaries (which represents our equity investment in those insurance subsidiaries) totaled $4.1 billion of our consolidated net assets. Despite holding assets above the minimum statutory capital thresholds and PMIERs financial requirements, the ability of Radian’s mortgage insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends on their common stock is restricted by certain provisions of the insurance laws of Pennsylvania, their state of domicile. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, ordinary dividends and distributions may only be paid out of an insurer’s positive unassigned surplus, measured as of the end of the prior fiscal year, unless the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approves the payment of extraordinary dividends or other distributions from another source.
As of December 31, 2020, Radian Guaranty had negative unassigned surplus of $859.5 million. Therefore, 0 dividends or other ordinary distributions can be paid by Radian Guaranty in 2021. In light of Radian Guaranty’s negative unassigned surplus related to operating losses in prior periods and the ongoing need to set aside contingency reserves, we do not anticipate that Radian Guaranty will be permitted under applicable insurance laws to pay ordinary dividends to Radian Group for the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2020, Radian Reinsurance had positive unassigned surplus of $319.7 million. As a result, Radian Reinsurance does have the ability to pay an ordinary dividend in 2021. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, Radian Reinsurance can distribute up to $36.1 million in 2021 without prior approval from the Pennsylvania Insurance Department.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, Radian Guaranty had contingency reserves of $3.4 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. As discussed above, absent early releases related to elevated incurred losses such as occurred in 2020, Radian Guaranty is scheduled to release contingency reserves to unassigned surplus in material amounts beginning in 2024, which should accelerate the reduction of its negative unassigned surplus. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, an insurer may request approval to pay an Extraordinary Distribution, subject to the approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Radian Guaranty sought and received such approval to return capital by paying Extraordinary Distributions to Radian Group in 2019 and 2018. As described above, Radian Reinsurance sought and received approval to return capital by paying an Extraordinary Distribution to Radian Group in January 2020.
The surplus additions (distributions) between Radian Group and Radian Guaranty and our other insurance subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Additions to Radian Guaranty surplus | | $ | 200.0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Distributions from Radian Guaranty surplus | | 0 | | | (375.0) | | | (450.0) | |
| Additions to other insurance subsidiaries’ surplus | | 0 | | | 65.2 | | | 0 | |
| Distributions from other insurance subsidiaries’ surplus | | (465.0) | | | (14.0) | | | 0 | |
17. Share-Based Compensation and Other Benefit Programs
All outstanding awards granted under the Equity Plans are performance-based or time-based awards in the form of RSUs, non-qualified stock options, or phantom stock. The maximum contractual term for stock options and similar instruments under the Equity Plans is 10 years, although awards of these instruments may be granted with shorter terms.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
There were 3,478,075 shares available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2020 (the “share reserve”). Each grant of restricted stock, RSUs, or performance share awards under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan (other than those settled in cash) reduces the share reserve available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan by 1.31 shares for every share subject to such grant. Absent this share reserve adjustment for outstanding restricted stock, RSUs, phantom stock or performance share awards, our shares remaining available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan would have been 8,050,843 shares as of December 31, 2020.
Most awards vest at the end of the performance or service period and will vest earlier under certain circumstances. In the event of a grantee’s death or disability, awards generally vest immediately. Upon retirement, if certain conditions are met, awards generally vest immediately or at the end of the performance period, if any. Certain time-based RSU awards granted to officers under our Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan will vest in whole or in part in the event the grantee’s employment is terminated by us without cause or for “good reason.” Awards granted to officers will vest in connection with a change of control only in the event the grantee’s employment is terminated by us without cause or the grantee terminates employment for “good reason,” in each case within 90 days before or one year after the change of control. Awards to our non-employee directors will vest in connection with a change of control only in the event the grantee fails to be eligibleappointed to insure loans purchased by the GSEs, mortgage insurers such as Radian Guaranty must meet the GSEs’ eligibility requirements, or PMIERs. The PMIERs are comprehensive, covering virtually all aspectsboard of directors of the businesssurviving entity or is not nominated for reelection, or fails to be reelected after nomination, to the board of directors of the Company or the surviving entity.
The following table summarizes the compensation cost recognized and operationsadditional information regarding all share-based awards for the years indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Compensation cost recognized: (1) | | | | | | |
| RSUs | | $ | 18,403 | | | $ | 20,694 | | | $ | 16,591 | |
| Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | 671 | | | 444 | | | 453 | |
| Non-Qualified Stock Options and Other | | 119 | | | 276 | | | 605 | |
| Total compensation cost recognized | | 19,193 | | | 21,414 | | | 17,649 | |
| Less: Costs deferred as acquisition costs | | 0 | | | 373 | | | 324 | |
| Share-based compensation expense | | 19,193 | | | 21,041 | | | 17,325 | |
| Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense | | 4,264 | | | 6,343 | | | 2,863 | |
| Share-based compensation expense, net | | $ | 14,929 | | | $ | 14,698 | | | $ | 14,462 | |
(1)Compensation cost is generally recognized over the periods that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. For purposes of calculating compensation cost recognized for retirement eligible grantees, we consider the service condition to be met (and recognize the full compensation costs) as of the date when a private mortgage insurer, including internal risk managementgrantee becomes retirement eligible.
As of December 31, 2020, unrecognized compensation expense for all of our outstanding share-based awards was $22.7 million. Absent a change of control under the Equity Plans, this expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.9 years. The ultimate unrecognized expense associated with our outstanding awards could differ, depending upon whether or not the performance and quality controls,service conditions are met.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
RSUs
Information with regard to RSUs to be settled in stock for the relationshipperiods indicated is as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Performance-Based | | Time-Vested |
| | Number of
Shares | | Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | Number of
Shares | | Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value |
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 (1) | | 2,375,005 | | | $ | 15.84 | | | 1,869,740 | | | $ | 13.82 | |
Granted (2) | | 839,330 | | | 11.91 | | | 763,608 | | | 13.49 | |
Performance adjustment (3) | | 168,749 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Vested (4) | | (1,174,535) | | | 13.14 | | | (501,283) | | | 15.98 | |
| Forfeited | | (22,305) | | | 18.69 | | | (13,180) | | | 17.61 | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2020 (1) | | 2,186,244 | | | 15.71 | | | 2,118,885 | | | 13.16 | |
(1)Outstanding RSUs represent shares that have not yet been issued because not all conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied. The final amount of RSUs distributed depends on the employee’s level of performance achieved and, with the exception of certain retirement-eligible employees, continued service through the vesting date, which could result in changes in vested RSUs.
(2)For performance-based RSUs, amount represents the number of target shares at grant date.
(3)For performance-based RSUs, represents the difference between the GSEsnumber of target shares at grant date and the number of shares vested at settlement, which can range from 0 to 200% of target depending on results over the applicable performance periods.
(4)Represents amounts vested during the year, including the impact of performance adjustments for performance-based awards.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of performance-based RSUs granted during 2019 and 2018 was $21.45 and $15.07, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of time-vested RSUs granted during 2019 and 2018 was $22.76 and $16.24, respectively.
The fair value as of the respective vesting dates of performance-based RSUs vested during 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $17.2 million, $10.6 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. The fair value as of the respective vesting dates of time-vested RSUs vested during 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $7.6 million, $10.9 million, and $4.2 million, respectively.
In February 2020, the Compensation and Human Capital Management Committee of Radian Group’s board of directors approved insurer,the amendment of outstanding performance-based RSU awards and time-based RSU awards held by eligible employees (including former employees) and directors of the Company to add dividend equivalent rights to such equity awards, subject to certain exclusions. Therefore, beginning in the first quarter of 2020, dividend equivalents are accrued on these awards when dividends are declared on the Company’s common stock and will generally be paid in cash when the awards are settled.
Performance-Based RSUs. In 2020, 2019 and 2018, the vesting of the performance-based RSUs granted to each executive officer and non-executive will be based upon the cumulative growth in Radian’s book value per share, adjusted for certain defined items, over a three-year performance period. The maximum payout at the end of the three-year performance period is 200% of the award’s target number of RSUs. Performance-based RSUs granted to executive officers are subject to a one-year post vesting holding period.
The grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs that are based on the cumulative growth in Radian’s book value per share is calculated based on the stock price as of the grant date, discounted for executives for the one-year post-vesting holding period. The compensation cost that is recognized over the remaining requisite service period is based on our expectations of the probable level of achievement of the performance condition.
Time-Vested RSUs. With the exception of certain time-vested RSUs granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 to non-employee directors, the time-vested RSU awards granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 are scheduled to vest in: (i) pro rata installments on each of the first 3 anniversaries of the grant date or (ii) generally at the end of three years. Certain time-vested RSU awards granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 to non-employee directors generally are subject to one-year cliff vesting; however, those awards, as well as awards granted to non-employee directors in earlier periods, remain outstanding and the approved insurer’s financial condition.shares are not issued until the non-employee director retires or certain conditions related to a change in control are met, as described above.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Non-Qualified Stock Options
Information with regard to stock options for the periods indicated is as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | | Number of
Shares | | Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share | | Weighted
Average
Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) |
| Outstanding, December 31, 2019 | | 981,547 | | | $ | 10.05 | | | | | |
| Granted | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Exercised | | (207,598) | | | 7.50 | | | | | |
| Forfeited | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Expired | | (430) | | | 18.42 | | | | | |
| Outstanding, December 31, 2020 | | 773,519 | | | $ | 10.73 | | | 3.2 | | $ | 7,366 | |
| Exercisable, December 31, 2020 | | 773,519 | | | $ | 10.73 | | | 3.2 | | $ | 7,366 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1)Based on the market price of $20.25 at December 31, 2020.
The PMIERsfollowing table summarizes additional information concerning stock option activity for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised | | $ | 3,344 | | | $ | 4,984 | | | $ | 6,274 | |
| Tax benefit of options exercised | | 702 | | | 1,047 | | | 1,318 | |
| Cash received from options exercised | | 1,553 | | | 2,416 | | | 1,425 | |
Upon the exercise of stock options, we generally issue shares from the authorized, unissued share reserves when the exercise price is less than the treasury stock repurchase price and state insurance regulations include various capital requirementsfrom treasury stock when the exercise price is greater than the treasury stock repurchase price.
Generally, the stock option awards have a four-year vesting period, with 50% of the award vesting on or after the third anniversary of the grant date and dividend restrictions basedthe remaining 50% of the award vesting on our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory financial positionor after the fourth anniversary of the grant date, provided the applicable stock price performance hurdle is met.
There were 0 stock options granted in 2020, 2019 and results of operations, as described below. Our failure to maintain adequate levels of capital could lead to intervention by the various insurance regulatory authorities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, business prospects and financial condition.2018.
Statutory Financial Statements
We prepare our statutory financial statements in accordance with the accounting practices required or permitted, if applicable, by the insurance departments of the respective states of domicile of our insurance subsidiaries. Required SAP are
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
established by the NAIC, as well as state laws, regulations and general administrative rules. In addition, insurance departments have the right to permit other specific practices that may deviate from prescribed practices. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we did not have any prescribed or permitted SAP that resulted in reported statutory surplus or risk-based capital being different from what would have been reported had NAIC statutory accounting practices been followed.
Reflecting the principal differences between SAP and GAAP, statutory financial statements typically do not include unrealized gains or losses on fixed maturityfixed-maturity securities, deferred policy acquisition costs, and certain net deferred tax assets and certain other less readily marketable assets that are designated as non-admitted assets. In addition to these general differences, SAP also requires that mortgage insurance companies establish a special contingency reserve equal to 50% of premiums earned in each year, generally to be maintained for 10 years, to protect policyholders against loss during adverse economic cycles. As a result of the requirement to establish and maintain this statutory liability, contingency reserves affect the ability of a mortgage insurer to pay dividends, as described below. With regulatory approval, a mortgage insurance company may make early withdrawals from this contingency reserve when incurred losses exceed 35% of net premiums in a calendar year. NeitherDue to elevated losses in 2020, Radian Guaranty nor any other of our other mortgage insurance subsidiaries releasedreceived regulatory approval to release $93.0 million from contingency reserves for the year. Radian Guaranty did not release any amounts from their contingency reserves in 2019 2018 or 2017.2018. Based on the typical 10-year holding requirement, Radian Guaranty is scheduled to release contingency reserves to unassigned surplus in material amounts beginning in 2024. See “—Statutory Dividend Restrictions” below for additional information.
As a mortgage guaranty insurer, we are eligible for a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations, related to amounts required to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves to the extent we purchase U.S. Mortgage Guaranty Tax and Loss Bonds issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Under SAP, this deduction reduces the tax provision reflected in the statutory financial statements, which in turn increases statutory net income and surplus. See Note 10surplus as well as Available Assets under the PMIERs. As of December 31, 2020, Radian Guaranty held $210.9 million of these bonds, which have a 10-year original maturity but may be redeemed in any tax year prior to maturity. If redeemed, the taxable income in the tax year of the redemption includes the previously deducted amount associated with the redeemed bond, and is subject to tax at the statutory tax rate applicable in the year of the redemption. Accordingly, if corporate income tax rates were to increase in a year subsequent to the tax year in which the deduction was taken, additional amounts of tax above what was paid originally for additional information.the bonds must be paid when those amounts are included in income in future years. If Radian Guaranty were to redeem its bonds early in anticipation of future corporate tax rate increases, its statutory surplus and PMIERs Available Assets would decline by the amount of the redemption only, which would be up to $210.9 million based on the amount held as of December 31, 2020. Under that scenario, Radian Guaranty would still remain in compliance with both minimum surplus requirements and the current PMIERs financial requirements, as described below.
All of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in Pennsylvania, and we currently write new business using 2 principal subsidiaries, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance.
Radian Guaranty, our only approved insurer under the PMIERs, is authorized as a monoline insurer to write mortgage guaranty insurance (or in states where there is no specific authorization for mortgage guaranty insurance, the applicable line of insurance under which mortgage guaranty insurance is regulated) in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Guam. Radian Reinsurance is licensed only in Pennsylvania as a stock casualty insurance company authorized to carry on the business of credit insurance, which includes the authority to write direct mortgage guaranty insurance. We use Radian Reinsurance to participate in the credit risk transfer programs developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Prior to the January 2020 actions described below, we also used Radian Reinsurance to provide reinsurance to Radian Guaranty. Our mortgage insurance subsidiaries also include Radian Insurance, Radian Mortgage Assurance, Radian Guaranty Reinsurance Inc., Radian Investor Surety Inc. and Radian Mortgage Guaranty Inc.; however, Radian Insurance is our only other mortgage insurance entity that had any remaining RIF as of December 31, 2019, totaling $10.2 million.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Our mortgage insurance subsidiaries’ statutory net income, statutory policyholders’ surplus and contingency reserve as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Radian Guaranty | | | | | |
| Statutory net income | $ | 703.4 |
| | $ | 501.9 |
| | $ | 445.1 |
|
| Statutory policyholders’ surplus | 637.7 |
| | 814.1 |
| | 1,201.0 |
|
| Contingency reserve | 2,607.8 |
| | 2,109.9 |
| | 1,667.0 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Radian Reinsurance | | | | | |
| Statutory net income | $ | 101.6 |
| | $ | 86.1 |
| | $ | 64.3 |
|
| Statutory policyholders’ surplus | 455.6 |
| | 356.2 |
| | 328.9 |
|
| Contingency reserve | 360.3 |
| | 293.5 |
| | 234.0 |
|
| | | | | | |
| All Other Mortgage Insurance Subsidiaries | | | | | |
| Statutory net income | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | (2.8 | ) | | $ | 0.1 |
|
| Statutory policyholders’ surplus | 45.7 |
| | 58.0 |
| | 58.6 |
|
| Contingency reserve | 1.8 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 1.7 |
|
In January 2020, in connection with the termination of an intercompany reinsurance agreement between Radian Reinsurance and Radian Guaranty, Radian Reinsurance transferred $6.0 billion in RIF to Radian Guaranty and released substantially all of its contingency reserves to unassigned surplus. In turn, Radian Guaranty established equivalent contingency reserves with a corresponding decrease to its unassigned surplus. As part of these actions, the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approved a $465 million return of capital from Radian Reinsurance to Radian Group as well as the transfer of $200 million of cash and marketable securities from Radian Group to Radian Guaranty in exchange for a surplus note. This intercompany surplus note has a 3% interest rate and a stated maturity of January 31, 2030.2030; however, any principal or interest payments made by Radian Guaranty are subject to approval by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. To date, 0 payments have been made related to this surplus note. The surplus note may be redeemed or converted to paid in capital at any time upon 30 days prior notice, subject to a request by Radian Guaranty for the approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Our mortgage insurance subsidiaries also include Radian Mortgage Assurance, Radian Insurance Inc., Radian Investor Surety Inc. and Radian Mortgage Guaranty Inc.
Additionally, as part of our title services, we offer title insurance through Radian Title Insurance, an Ohio domiciled title insurance underwriter and settlement services company that is licensed to issue title insurance policies in 39 states and the District of Columbia.
Radian Title Insurance’sGroup Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory net income and statutory policyholders’ surplus for the years ended and statutory net income were $27.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.2020, 2019 and 2018 were as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Statutory net income (loss) | | | | | | |
| Radian Guaranty | | $ | 441.9 | | | $ | 703.4 | | | $ | 501.9 | |
| Radian Reinsurance | | 32.5 | | | 101.6 | | | 86.1 | |
| Other Mortgage Subsidiaries | | 1.1 | | | 0.1 | | | (2.8) | |
| Radian Title Insurance | | 2.1 | | | 0.3 | | | (1.8) | |
| | | | | | |
| Statutory policyholders’ surplus | | | | | | |
| Radian Guaranty | | $ | 481.5 | | | $ | 637.7 | | | $ | 814.1 | |
| Radian Reinsurance | | 360.7 | | | 455.6 | | | 356.2 | |
| Other Mortgage Subsidiaries | | 41.3 | | | 45.7 | | | 58.0 | |
| Radian Title Insurance | | 28.8 | | | 27.0 | | | 27.0 | |
Statutory Capital Requirements
Under state insurance regulations, Radian Guaranty is required to maintain minimum surplus levels and, in certain states, a minimummaximum ratio of statutory capitalnet RIF relative to the level of net RIF,statutory capital, or Risk-to-capital. There are 16 RBC States that currently impose a Statutory RBC Requirement. The most common Statutory RBC Requirement is that a mortgage insurer’s Risk-to-capital may not exceed 25 to 1. In certain of the RBC States, a mortgage insurer must satisfy a MPP Requirement. Unless an RBC State grants a waiver or other form of relief, if a mortgage insurer, such as Radian Guaranty, is not in compliance with the Statutory RBC Requirement of that state, the mortgage insurer may be prohibited from writing new mortgage insurance business in that state. The statutory capital requirements for the non-RBC States are de minimis (ranging from $1 million to $5 million); however, the insurance laws of these states generally grant broad supervisory powers to state agencies or officials to enforce rules or exercise discretion affecting almost every significant aspect of the insurance business, including the power to revoke or restrict an insurance company’s ability to write new business. Radian Guaranty’s domiciliary state, Pennsylvania, is not one of the RBC States.
Radian Guaranty was in compliance with theall applicable Statutory RBC Requirements or MPP Requirements, as applicable, in each of the RBC States as of December 31, 2019.2020. Radian Guaranty’s Risk-to-capital calculation appears in the table below.was 12.7:1 and 13.6:1 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. For purposes of the Risk-to-capital requirements imposed by certain states, statutory capital is defined as the sum of statutory policyholders’ surplus plus statutory contingency reserves.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| ($ in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 |
RIF, net (1) | $ | 44,076.7 |
| | $ | 40,711.3 |
|
| | | | |
| Common stock and paid-in capital | $ | 1,041.0 |
| | $ | 1,416.0 |
|
| Surplus Note | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
|
| Unassigned earnings (deficit) | (503.3 | ) | | (701.9 | ) |
| Statutory policyholders’ surplus | 637.7 |
| | 814.1 |
|
| Contingency reserve | 2,607.8 |
| | 2,109.9 |
|
| Statutory capital | $ | 3,245.5 |
| | $ | 2,924.0 |
|
| | | | |
| Risk-to-capital | 13.6:1 |
| | 13.9:1 |
______________________
| |
(1) | Excludes risk ceded through all reinsurance programs (including with affiliates) and RIF on defaulted loans. |
Our other mortgage insurance and title insurance subsidiaries were also in compliance with all statutory and counterparty capital requirements as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019.
The NAIC is in the process of reviewing the minimum capital and surplus requirements for mortgage insurers and considering changes to the Model Act. In December 2019, a working group of state regulators released exposure drafts of a revised Model Act, including new proposed mortgage guaranty insurance capital requirements for mortgage insurers. TheWhile the process for developing this framework was inactive as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we understand the initiative remains active and that an effort to resume work on the exposure draft is ongoing, and the outcome of this process remains uncertain.expected in 2021. As proposed, the capital requirements set forth in the currentmost recent exposure draft are impacted,rely on, among other things, by changes in the economic and housing environment, including changes in home prices and incomes. Given the current economic and housing environment, if the exposure draft of the new Model Act was adopted and in effect today, we do not believe that the capital requirements imposed by the new Model Act would exceed those of the current PMIERs financial requirements described below.
PMIERs.PMIERs
The PMIERs financial requirements require that a mortgage insurer’s Available Assets meet or exceed its Minimum Required Assets. At December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Guaranty wasis an approved mortgage insurer under the PMIERs and is in compliance with the current PMIERs financial requirements.
Under the PMIERs there are increased financial requirements for loans in default, including as a result of natural disasters and pandemics. As a result, increases in defaults related to the COVID-19 pandemic have subjected Radian Guaranty to an increase in Minimum Required Assets under the PMIERs, and therefore, could impact our compliance with the PMIERs or continue to negatively impact our results of operations. However, as further described below, the PMIERs apply a multiplier that reduces the Minimum Required Asset factor for loans that have become non-performing as a result of a “FEMA Declared Major
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Disaster” event, including as a result of participation in a forbearance program, because those loans generally have a higher likelihood of curing following the conclusion of the event. For these defaults, the PMIERs apply the Disaster Related Capital Charge, which is a 0.30 multiplier to the factor that normally would be applied to such default, effectively reducing the required asset amount by 70%, unless the resulting Minimum Required Asset amount after applying the Disaster Related Capital Charge would be less than the Minimum Required Asset amount for the loan if it was performing, in which case the Minimum Required Asset amount would equal the performing level amount. Pursuant to the COVID-19 Amendment, the Disaster Related Capital Charge is now applied nationwide to all COVID-19 Defaulted Loans for no longer than three calendar months beginning with the month the loan becomes non-performing (i.e., missed 2 monthly payments), or if greater, the period of time that the loan is subject to a forbearance plan, repayment plan or loan modification trial period granted in response to a financial hardship related to COVID-19. See Note 1 for discussion about the elevated risks and uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
The GSEs may amend the PMIERs at any time, and they have broad discretion to interpret the requirements, which could impact the calculation of Radian Guaranty’s Available Assets and/or Minimum Required Assets. In addition, the GSEs have a broad range of consent rights under the PMIERs and require private mortgage insurers to obtain the prior consent of the GSEs before taking certain actions. If Radian Guaranty is unable to satisfy the requirements set forth in the PMIERs, the GSEs could restrict it from conducting certain types of business with them or take actions that may include not purchasing loans insured by Radian Guaranty.
Statutory Dividend Restrictions
As of December 31, 2019,2020, the amount of restricted net assets held by our consolidated insurance subsidiaries (which represents our equity investment in those insurance subsidiaries) totaled $4.2$4.1 billion of our consolidated net assets. Despite holding assets above the minimum statutory capital thresholds and PMIERs financial requirements, the ability of Radian’s mortgage insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends on their common stock is restricted by certain provisions of the insurance laws of Pennsylvania, their state of domicile. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, ordinary dividends and distributions may only be paid out of an insurer’s positive unassigned surplus, measured as of the end of the prior fiscal year, unless the Pennsylvania Insurance Department approves the payment of extraordinary dividends or other distributions from another source.
As of December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Guaranty and Radian Reinsurance had negative unassigned surplus of $503.3 million and $50.4 million, respectively.$859.5 million. Therefore, 0 dividends or other ordinary distributions can be paid by these subsidiariesRadian Guaranty in 2020.2021. In light of Radian Guaranty’s negative unassigned surplus related to operating losses in prior periods and the ongoing need to set aside contingency reserves, we do not anticipate that Radian Guaranty will be permitted under applicable insurance laws to pay ordinary dividends to Radian Group for the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2020, Radian Reinsurance had positive unassigned surplus of $319.7 million. As a result, Radian Reinsurance does have the ability to pay an ordinary dividend in 2021. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, Radian Reinsurance can distribute up to $36.1 million in 2021 without prior approval from the Pennsylvania Insurance Department.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, Radian Guaranty had contingency reserves of $3.4 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. As discussed above, absent early releases related to elevated incurred losses such as occurred in 2020, Radian Guaranty is scheduled to release contingency reserves to unassigned surplus in material amounts beginning in 2024, which should accelerate the reduction of its negative unassigned surplus. Under Pennsylvania’s insurance laws, an insurer may request approval to pay an
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Extraordinary Distribution, subject to the approval of the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Radian Guaranty sought and received such approval to return capital by paying Extraordinary Distributions to Radian Group in 2019 and 2018. As described above, Radian Reinsurance sought and received approval to return capital by paying an Extraordinary Distribution to Radian Group in January 2020.
The surplus additions (distributions) between Radian Group and Radian Guaranty and our other insurance subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 were as follows:follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Additions to Radian Guaranty surplus | | $ | 200.0 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Distributions from Radian Guaranty surplus | | 0 | | | (375.0) | | | (450.0) | |
| Additions to other insurance subsidiaries’ surplus | | 0 | | | 65.2 | | | 0 | |
| Distributions from other insurance subsidiaries’ surplus | | (465.0) | | | (14.0) | | | 0 | |
17. Share-Based Compensation and Other Benefit Programs
All outstanding awards granted under the Equity Plans are performance-based or time-based awards in the form of RSUs, non-qualified stock options, or phantom stock. The maximum contractual term for stock options and similar instruments under the Equity Plans is 10 years, although awards of these instruments may be granted with shorter terms.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Additions to Radian Guaranty surplus | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 100.0 |
|
| Distributions from Radian Guaranty surplus | (375.0 | ) | | (450.0 | ) | | (175.0 | ) |
| Additions to other insurance subsidiaries’ surplus | 65.4 |
| | 30.3 |
| | 175.2 |
|
| Distributions from other insurance subsidiaries’ surplus | (14.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
155
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
There were 3,478,075 shares available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2020 (the “share reserve”). Each grant of restricted stock, RSUs, or performance share awards under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan (other than those settled in cash) reduces the share reserve available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan by 1.31 shares for every share subject to such grant. Absent this share reserve adjustment for outstanding restricted stock, RSUs, phantom stock or performance share awards, our shares remaining available for grant under the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan would have been 8,050,843 shares as of December 31, 2020.
Most awards vest at the end of the performance or service period and will vest earlier under certain circumstances. In the event of a grantee’s death or disability, awards generally vest immediately. Upon retirement, if certain conditions are met, awards generally vest immediately or at the end of the performance period, if any. Certain time-based RSU awards granted to officers under our Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan will vest in whole or in part in the event the grantee’s employment is terminated by us without cause or for “good reason.” Awards granted to officers will vest in connection with a change of control only in the event the grantee’s employment is terminated by us without cause or the grantee terminates employment for “good reason,” in each case within 90 days before or one year after the change of control. Awards to our non-employee directors will vest in connection with a change of control only in the event the grantee fails to be appointed to the board of directors of the surviving entity or is not nominated for reelection, or fails to be reelected after nomination, to the board of directors of the Company or the surviving entity.
The following table summarizes the compensation cost recognized and additional information regarding all share-based awards for the years indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Compensation cost recognized: (1) | | | | | | |
| RSUs | | $ | 18,403 | | | $ | 20,694 | | | $ | 16,591 | |
| Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | 671 | | | 444 | | | 453 | |
| Non-Qualified Stock Options and Other | | 119 | | | 276 | | | 605 | |
| Total compensation cost recognized | | 19,193 | | | 21,414 | | | 17,649 | |
| Less: Costs deferred as acquisition costs | | 0 | | | 373 | | | 324 | |
| Share-based compensation expense | | 19,193 | | | 21,041 | | | 17,325 | |
| Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense | | 4,264 | | | 6,343 | | | 2,863 | |
| Share-based compensation expense, net | | $ | 14,929 | | | $ | 14,698 | | | $ | 14,462 | |
(1)Compensation cost is generally recognized over the periods that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. For purposes of calculating compensation cost recognized for retirement eligible grantees, we consider the service condition to be met (and recognize the full compensation costs) as of the date when a grantee becomes retirement eligible.
As of December 31, 2020, unrecognized compensation expense for all of our outstanding share-based awards was $22.7 million. Absent a change of control under the Equity Plans, this expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.9 years. The ultimate unrecognized expense associated with our outstanding awards could differ, depending upon whether or not the performance and service conditions are met.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
RSUs
Information with regard to RSUs to be settled in stock for the periods indicated is as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Performance-Based | | Time-Vested |
| | Number of
Shares | | Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value | | Number of
Shares | | Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value |
Outstanding, December 31, 2019 (1) | | 2,375,005 | | | $ | 15.84 | | | 1,869,740 | | | $ | 13.82 | |
Granted (2) | | 839,330 | | | 11.91 | | | 763,608 | | | 13.49 | |
Performance adjustment (3) | | 168,749 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Vested (4) | | (1,174,535) | | | 13.14 | | | (501,283) | | | 15.98 | |
| Forfeited | | (22,305) | | | 18.69 | | | (13,180) | | | 17.61 | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2020 (1) | | 2,186,244 | | | 15.71 | | | 2,118,885 | | | 13.16 | |
(1)Outstanding RSUs represent shares that have not yet been issued because not all conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments have been satisfied. The final amount of RSUs distributed depends on the employee’s level of performance achieved and, with the exception of certain retirement-eligible employees, continued service through the vesting date, which could result in changes in vested RSUs.
(2)For performance-based RSUs, amount represents the number of target shares at grant date.
(3)For performance-based RSUs, represents the difference between the number of target shares at grant date and the number of shares vested at settlement, which can range from 0 to 200% of target depending on results over the applicable performance periods.
(4)Represents amounts vested during the year, including the impact of performance adjustments for performance-based awards.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of performance-based RSUs granted during 2019 and 2018 was $21.45 and $15.07, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of time-vested RSUs granted during 2019 and 2018 was $22.76 and $16.24, respectively.
The fair value as of the respective vesting dates of performance-based RSUs vested during 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $17.2 million, $10.6 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. The fair value as of the respective vesting dates of time-vested RSUs vested during 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $7.6 million, $10.9 million, and $4.2 million, respectively.
In February 2020, the Compensation and Human Capital Management Committee of Radian Group’s board of directors approved the amendment of outstanding performance-based RSU awards and time-based RSU awards held by eligible employees (including former employees) and directors of the Company to add dividend equivalent rights to such equity awards, subject to certain exclusions. Therefore, beginning in the first quarter of 2020, dividend equivalents are accrued on these awards when dividends are declared on the Company’s common stock and will generally be paid in cash when the awards are settled.
Performance-Based RSUs. In 2020, 2019 and 2018, the vesting of the performance-based RSUs granted to each executive officer and non-executive will be based upon the cumulative growth in Radian’s book value per share, adjusted for certain defined items, over a three-year performance period. The maximum payout at the end of the three-year performance period is 200% of the award’s target number of RSUs. Performance-based RSUs granted to executive officers are subject to a one-year post vesting holding period.
The grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs that are based on the cumulative growth in Radian’s book value per share is calculated based on the stock price as of the grant date, discounted for executives for the one-year post-vesting holding period. The compensation cost that is recognized over the remaining requisite service period is based on our expectations of the probable level of achievement of the performance condition.
Time-Vested RSUs. With the exception of certain time-vested RSUs granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 to non-employee directors, the time-vested RSU awards granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 are scheduled to vest in: (i) pro rata installments on each of the first 3 anniversaries of the grant date or (ii) generally at the end of three years. Certain time-vested RSU awards granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018 to non-employee directors generally are subject to one-year cliff vesting; however, those awards, as well as awards granted to non-employee directors in earlier periods, remain outstanding and the shares are not issued until the non-employee director retires or certain conditions related to a change in control are met, as described above.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Non-Qualified Stock Options
Information with regard to stock options for the periods indicated is as follows.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | | Number of
Shares | | Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share | | Weighted
Average
Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) |
| Outstanding, December 31, 2019 | | 981,547 | | | $ | 10.05 | | | | | |
| Granted | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Exercised | | (207,598) | | | 7.50 | | | | | |
| Forfeited | | 0 | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Expired | | (430) | | | 18.42 | | | | | |
| Outstanding, December 31, 2020 | | 773,519 | | | $ | 10.73 | | | 3.2 | | $ | 7,366 | |
| Exercisable, December 31, 2020 | | 773,519 | | | $ | 10.73 | | | 3.2 | | $ | 7,366 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1)Based on the market price of $20.25 at December 31, 2020.
The following table summarizes additional information concerning stock option activity for the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| ($ in thousands, except per-share amounts) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised | | $ | 3,344 | | | $ | 4,984 | | | $ | 6,274 | |
| Tax benefit of options exercised | | 702 | | | 1,047 | | | 1,318 | |
| Cash received from options exercised | | 1,553 | | | 2,416 | | | 1,425 | |
Upon the exercise of stock options, we generally issue shares from the authorized, unissued share reserves when the exercise price is less than the treasury stock repurchase price and from treasury stock when the exercise price is greater than the treasury stock repurchase price.
Generally, the stock option awards have a four-year vesting period, with 50% of the award vesting on or after the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% of the award vesting on or after the fourth anniversary of the grant date, provided the applicable stock price performance hurdle is met.
There were 0 stock options granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On May 9, 2018, stockholders of Radian approved the Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP, which amended and restated the Radian Group Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP is designed to allow eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount of 15% off the lower of the fair market value of our common stock at the beginning or end of a six-month offering period (each period being the first and second six months in a calendar year).
Under this plan, we issued 100,022; 107,009; and 103,668 shares to employees during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of February 2021, 1,776,532 shares remain available for issuance under the Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP.
Benefit Plans
The Radian Group Inc. Savings Incentive Plan (“Savings Plan”) covers substantially all of our full-time and our part-time employees. Participants can contribute up to 100% of their base earnings as pretax and/or after-tax (Roth IRA) contributions up to a maximum amount of $19,500 for 2020. The Savings Plan also includes a catch-up contribution provision whereby participants who are or will be age 50 and above during the Savings Plan year may contribute an additional contribution. The maximum catch-up contribution for the Savings Plan in 2020 was $6,500. We match up to 100% of the first 6.0% of eligible compensation contributed in any given year. Our expense for matching funds for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $7.8 million, $5.6 million and $6.1 million, respectively.
Radian Group Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
18. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 Quarters |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | | Year |
| Net premiums earned | | $ | 277,415 | | | $ | 249,295 | | | $ | 286,471 | | | $ | 302,140 | | | $ | 1,115,321 | |
| Services revenue | | 31,927 | | | 28,075 | | | 33,943 | | | 11,440 | | | 105,385 | |
| Net investment income | | 40,944 | | | 38,723 | | | 36,255 | | | 38,115 | | | 154,037 | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | (22,027) | | | 47,276 | | | 17,652 | | | 17,376 | | | 60,277 | |
| Provision for losses | | 35,951 | | | 304,418 | | | 88,084 | | | 56,664 | | | 485,117 | |
| Policy acquisition costs | | 7,413 | | | 6,015 | | | 10,166 | | | 7,395 | | | 30,989 | |
| Cost of services | | 22,141 | | | 17,972 | | | 24,353 | | | 21,600 | | | 86,066 | |
| Other operating expenses | | 69,110 | | | 60,582 | | | 69,377 | | | 81,641 | | | 280,710 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | 979 | | | 979 | | | 961 | | | 2,225 | | | 5,144 | |
| Net income (loss) | | 140,461 | | | (29,951) | | | 135,103 | | | 148,013 | | | 393,626 | |
Diluted net income (loss) per share (1) | | $ | 0.70 | | | $ | (0.15) | | | $ | 0.70 | | | $ | 0.76 | | | $ | 2.00 | |
| Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted | | 201,819 | | | 193,299 | | | 194,156 | | | 194,663 | | | 196,642 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 Quarters |
| | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | | Year |
| Net premiums earned | | $ | 263,512 | | | $ | 299,166 | | | $ | 281,185 | | | $ | 301,486 | | | $ | 1,145,349 | |
| Services revenue | | 32,753 | | | 39,303 | | | 42,509 | | | 40,031 | | | 154,596 | |
| Net investment income | | 43,847 | | | 43,761 | | | 42,756 | | | 41,432 | | | 171,796 | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 21,913 | | | 12,540 | | | 13,009 | | | 4,257 | | | 51,719 | |
| Provision for losses | | 20,754 | | | 47,427 | | | 29,231 | | | 34,619 | | | 132,031 | |
| Policy acquisition costs | | 5,893 | | | 6,203 | | | 6,435 | | | 6,783 | | | 25,314 | |
| Cost of services | | 24,157 | | | 27,845 | | | 29,044 | | | 27,278 | | | 108,324 | |
| Other operating expenses | | 78,805 | | | 70,046 | | | 76,384 | | | 80,894 | | | 306,129 | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | 0 | | | 16,798 | | | 5,940 | | | 0 | | | 22,738 | |
| Impairment of goodwill | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 4,828 | | | 4,828 | |
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | | 2,187 | | | 2,139 | | | 2,139 | | | 15,823 | | | 22,288 | |
| Net income | | 170,957 | | | 166,730 | | | 173,438 | | | 161,184 | | | 672,309 | |
Diluted net income per share (1) | | $ | 0.78 | | | $ | 0.78 | | | $ | 0.83 | | | $ | 0.79 | | | $ | 3.20 | |
| Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted | | 218,343 | | | 213,603 | | | 208,691 | | | 205,165 | | | 210,340 | |
(1)Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed independently for each period presented. Consequently, the sum of the quarters may not equal the total net income per share for the year.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 Quarters |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | | Year |
| Net premiums earned—insurance | $ | 263,512 |
| | $ | 299,166 |
| | $ | 281,185 |
| | $ | 301,486 |
| | $ | 1,145,349 |
|
| Services revenue | 32,753 |
| | 39,303 |
| | 42,509 |
| | 40,031 |
| | 154,596 |
|
| Net investment income | 43,847 |
| | 43,761 |
| | 42,756 |
| | 41,432 |
| | 171,796 |
|
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 21,913 |
| | 12,540 |
| | 13,009 |
| | 4,257 |
| | 51,719 |
|
| Provision for losses | 20,754 |
| | 47,427 |
| | 29,231 |
| | 34,619 |
| | 132,031 |
|
| Policy acquisition costs | 5,893 |
| | 6,203 |
| | 6,435 |
| | 6,783 |
| | 25,314 |
|
| Cost of services | 24,157 |
| | 27,845 |
| | 29,044 |
| | 27,278 |
| | 108,324 |
|
| Other operating expenses | 78,805 |
| | 70,046 |
| | 76,384 |
| | 80,894 |
| | 306,129 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | — |
| | 16,798 |
| | 5,940 |
| | — |
| | 22,738 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,828 |
| | 4,828 |
|
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | 2,187 |
| | 2,139 |
| | 2,139 |
| | 15,823 |
| | 22,288 |
|
| Net income | 170,957 |
| | 166,730 |
| | 173,438 |
| | 161,184 |
| | 672,309 |
|
Diluted net income per share (1) | $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | 0.79 |
| | $ | 3.20 |
|
| Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted | 218,343 |
| | 213,603 |
| | 208,691 |
| | 205,165 |
| | 210,340 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 Quarters |
| | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth | | Year |
| Net premiums earned—insurance | $ | 242,550 |
| | $ | 251,344 |
| | $ | 258,431 |
| | $ | 261,682 |
| | $ | 1,014,007 |
|
| Services revenue | 33,164 |
| | 36,828 |
| | 36,566 |
| | 38,414 |
| | 144,972 |
|
| Net investment income | 33,956 |
| | 37,473 |
| | 38,995 |
| | 42,051 |
| | 152,475 |
|
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | (18,887 | ) | | (7,404 | ) | | (4,480 | ) | | (11,705 | ) | | (42,476 | ) |
| Provision for losses | 37,283 |
| | 19,337 |
| | 20,881 |
| | 27,140 |
| | 104,641 |
|
| Policy acquisition costs | 7,117 |
| | 5,996 |
| | 5,667 |
| | 6,485 |
| | 25,265 |
|
| Cost of services | 23,126 |
| | 24,205 |
| | 25,854 |
| | 24,939 |
| | 98,124 |
|
| Other operating expenses | 63,243 |
| | 70,184 |
| | 70,125 |
| | 77,266 |
| | 280,818 |
|
| Restructuring and other exit costs | 551 |
| | 925 |
| | 4,464 |
| | 113 |
| | 6,053 |
|
| Amortization and impairment of other acquired intangible assets | 2,748 |
| | 2,748 |
| | 3,472 |
| | 3,461 |
| | 12,429 |
|
| Net income | 114,486 |
| | 208,949 |
| | 142,797 |
| | 139,779 |
| | 606,011 |
|
Diluted net income per share (1) | $ | 0.52 |
| | $ | 0.96 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 2.77 |
|
| Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted | 219,883 |
| | 217,830 |
| | 217,902 |
| | 217,883 |
| | 218,553 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Diluted net income per share is computed independently for each period presented. Consequently, the sum of the quarters may not equal the total net income per share for the year. |
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.Disclosure
None.
| |
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures. |
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 20192020 pursuant to Rule 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives. Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all errors and fraud. A control system, irrespective of how well it is designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance and cannot guarantee that it will succeed in its stated objectives.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2019,2020, using the criteria described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under the updated internal control framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.2020. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192020 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20192020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
160
| |
Item 9B. | Other Information. |
None.
None.
PART III
| |
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. |
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019.2020. Accordingly, we have omitted the information from this Item pursuant to General Instruction G (3) of Form 10-K.
| |
Item 11. | Executive Compensation. |
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019.2020. Accordingly, we have omitted the information from this Item pursuant to General Instruction G (3) of Form 10-K.
| |
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019.2020. Accordingly, we have omitted the information from this Item pursuant to General Instruction G (3) of Form 10-K.
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019.2020. Each number of securities reflected in the table is a reference to shares of our common stock.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category (1) | | (a)
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights | (b)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights | (c)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a)) |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (2) | | 5,197,971 | | (3) | $ | 1.80 | | (4) | 5,319,844 | | (5) |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | | — | | | — | | | — | | |
| Total | | 5,197,971 | | (3) | $ | 1.80 | | (4) | 5,319,844 | | (5) |
(1)The table does not include information for equity compensation plans assumed by us in mergers, under which we do not grant additional awards.
(2)These plans consist of our 1995 Equity Plan, 2008 Equity Plan, the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan and our Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP.
(3)Represents 22,637 shares of phantom stock issued under our 1995 Equity Plan, 96,686 shares of phantom stock, 359,212 non-qualified stock options and 631,092 RSUs issued under our 2008 Equity Plan, and 414,307 non-qualified stock options and 3,674,037 RSUs issued under our Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan. Of the RSUs included herein, 2,186,244 are performance-based stock-settled RSUs that could potentially pay out between 0% and 200% of this represented target.
(4)The shares of phantom stock and RSUs were granted at full value, and therefore, have a weighted-average exercise price of $0. Excluding shares of phantom stock and RSUs from this calculation, the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding non-qualified stock options was $10.73 at December 31, 2020.
(5)Includes 3,478,075 shares available for issuance under our Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan, and 1,841,769 shares available for issuance under our Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP, in each case as of December 31, 2020. In January 2021, we issued 65,237 shares from the shares available for issuance under our Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP. As of February 2021, 1,776,532 shares remain available for issuance under the Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category (1) | (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | (b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (2) | 5,402,083 |
| (3) | $ | 2.19 |
| (4) | 8,207,808 |
| (5) |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Total | 5,402,083 |
| (3) | $ | 2.19 |
| (4) | 8,207,808 |
| (5) |
| | | | | | | |
| |
(1) | The table does not include information for equity compensation plans assumed by us in mergers, under which we do not grant additional awards. |
| |
(2) | These plans consist of our 1995 Equity Plan, 2008 Equity Plan, the Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan and our Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP. |
| |
(3) | Represents 175,791 shares of phantom stock issued under our 1995 Equity Plan, 496,152 non-qualified stock options and 760,426 RSUs issued under our 2008 Equity Plan, and 485,395 non-qualified stock options and 3,484,319 RSUs issued under our Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan. Of the RSUs included herein, 2,375,005 are performance-based stock-settled RSUs that could potentially pay out between 0% and 200% of this represented target. |
| |
(4) | The shares of phantom stock and RSUs were granted at full value, and therefore, have a weighted-average exercise price of $0. Excluding shares of phantom stock and RSUs from this calculation, the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding non-qualified stock options was $10.05 at December 31, 2019. |
| |
(5) | Includes 6,266,017 shares available for issuance under our Amended and Restated Equity Compensation Plan, and 1,941,791 shares available for issuance under our Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP, in each case as of December 31, 2019. In January 2020, we issued 39,332 shares from the shares available for issuance under our Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP. As a result, 1,902,459 shares currently remain available for issuance under the Amended and Restated Radian Group Inc. ESPP. |
| |
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019.2020. Accordingly, we have omitted the information from this Item pursuant to General Instruction G (3) of Form 10-K.
167
| |
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2019.2020. Accordingly, we have omitted the information from this Item pursuant to General Instruction G (3) of Form 10-K.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
| | | | | |
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
(a)
| |
| 1. | Financial Statements—See the “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Item 8 of this report for a list of the financial statements filed as part of this report. |
2.Exhibits—See “Index to Exhibits” on pageof this report for a list of exhibits filed as part of this report.3.Financial Statement Schedules—See the “Index to Financial Statement Schedules” on pageof this report for a list of the financial statement schedules filed as part of this report.Schedule I—Summary of investments—other than investments in related parties (December 31, 2019) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2. | Exhibits—See “Index to Exhibits” on page | | of this report for a list of exhibits filed as part of this report. |
Schedule II—Financial information of Radian Group, Inc., Parent Company Only (Registrant) Condensed Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 Condensed Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 Supplemental Notes to Condensed Financial Statements Schedule IV—Reinsurance (December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017) | |
Item 16.3. | Financial Statement Schedules—The following financial statement schedules are filed as part of this Form 10-K Summary.and appear immediately following the signature page. |
| | | | | | | | |
| Schedule I—Summary of investments—other than investments in related parties (December 31, 2020) | |
| Schedule II—Financial information of Radian Group Inc., Parent Company Only (Registrant) | |
| Condensed Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 | |
| Condensed Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 | |
| Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 | |
| Supplemental Notes to Condensed Financial Statements | |
| Schedule IV—Reinsurance (December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018) | |
| All other schedules are omitted because the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules, or because the information required is included in our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto. | |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| | | | | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit |
| |
Exhibit
Number
| Exhibit |
| 3.1 |
|
| |
| 3.2 |
|
| |
| 3.3 |
|
| |
| 3.4 |
|
| |
| 3.5 |
|
| |
| 3.6 |
|
| |
| 3.7 |
|
| |
| 3.8 |
|
| |
| 3.9 | |
| |
| 4.1 |
|
| |
| 4.2 |
|
| |
| 4.3 |
|
| |
| 4.4 |
|
| |
| 4.5 |
|
| | | | | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit |
| |
| 4.6 |
|
| 4.7 |
|
*4.74.8 | |
| 4.9 |
|
| |
| +10.1 | |
|
| |
Exhibit
Number
| Exhibit |
| |
| +10.2 |
|
| |
| 10.3 |
|
| |
| +10.4 |
|
| |
| +10.5 |
|
| |
| +10.6 | |
| |
| +10.7 |
|
| |
| +10.8 |
|
| |
| +10.9 |
|
| |
| +10.10 |
|
| |
| +10.11 | |
| |
+10.12 |
|
| | | | | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit |
| |
+10.1310.12 |
|
| |
*10.1410.13 | Global Expense Allocation and Services Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2016, between the Registrant and each of its insurance subsidiaries: Radian Guaranty Inc., Radian Insurance Inc., Radian Mortgage Assurance Inc., Radian Mortgage Insurance Inc., Radian Guaranty Reinsurance Inc., Radian Reinsurance Inc., Radian Mortgage Guaranty Inc. and Radian Investor Surety Inc.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 1-11356) for the year ended December 31, 2019)
|
| |
*10.1510.14 |
|
| |
+10.1610.15 |
|
| |
|
| |
Exhibit
Number
| Exhibit |
+10.17 |
|
| |
+10.1810.17 |
|
| |
10.19+10.18 | Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release, dated as of September 16, 2014 by and among Radian Guaranty Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., and Bank of America, N.A., as a successor to BofA Home Loans Servicing f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP on its own behalf and as successor in interest by de jure merger to Countrywide Bank FSB, formerly Treasury Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (file no. 1-11356) dated September 16, 2014 and filed on September 19, 2014)
|
| |
+10.2010.19 |
|
| |
+10.2110.20 |
|
| |
+10.22
10.21 |
|
| |
+10.2310.22 |
|
| |
+10.2410.23 |
|
| | | | | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit |
| |
+10.2510.24 |
|
| |
+10.2610.25 |
|
| |
+10.2710.26 |
|
| |
+10.2810.27 |
|
| |
+10.2910.28 |
|
| |
+10.3010.29 |
|
| |
+10.3110.30 |
|
| |
|
| |
Exhibit
Number
| Exhibit |
+10.32 |
|
| |
+10.3310.32 |
|
| |
+10.3410.33 |
|
| |
+10.3510.34 |
|
| |
+10.3610.35 |
|
| |
+10.3710.36 |
|
| | | | | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit |
| |
+10.3810.37 |
|
| |
+10.3910.38 |
|
| |
+10.4010.39 |
|
| |
+10.4110.40 |
|
| |
+10.4210.41 |
|
| |
10.43+10.42 | Credit Agreement, dated October 16, 2017, by and among the Registrant, Royal Bank of Canada, as Administrative Agent, RBC Capital Markets and U.S. Bank National Association, as Syndication Agents, Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners, Associated Bank, National Association, as Documentation Agent, and certain other banks and financial institutions (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (file no. 1-11356) dated October 16, 2017 and filed on October 20, 2017)
|
| |
10.4410.43 | Augmenting Lender Supplement, dated October 26, 2018, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2017, among the Registrant, the Lenders party thereto and Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.91 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 1-11356) dated February 28, 2019 and filed on February 28, 2019)
|
| |
10.4510.44 | First Amendment, dated as of December 21, 2018, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2017 (as amended by that certain Augmenting Lender Supplement dated as of October 26, 2018), by and among the Registrant, each of the lenders from time to time party thereto, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and the other agents and arrangers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.92 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 1-11356) dated February 28, 2019 and filed on February 28, 2019)
|
| |
|
| |
Exhibit
Number
| Exhibit |
10.46 |
|
| +10.46 |
|
*2110.47 | Second Amendment, dated as of May 6, 2020, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2017 (as amended by that certain Augmenting Lender Supplement dated as of October 26, 2018 and that certain First Amendment dated as of December 21, 2018), by and among the Registrant, each of the lenders from time to time party thereto, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and the other agents and arrangers party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no. 1-11356) for the period ended June 30, 2020)
|
| | | | | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit |
| |
| +10.48 |
|
| +10.49 |
|
| +10.50 |
|
| +10.51 |
|
| *21 |
|
| |
| *23.1 |
|
| |
| *31 |
|
| |
| **32 |
|
| *101.INS | |
*101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
|
| *101.SCH | |
*101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
| *101.CAL | |
*101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
| *101.DEF | |
*101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
| *101.LAB | |
*101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
| *101.PRE | |
*101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
| *104 | |
*104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.INS)
|
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
+ Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement
SIGNATURESSignatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 28, 2020.
| | | | | |
| Radian Group Inc. |
| |
Radian Group Inc. |
| |
| By: | /s/ Richard G. Thornberry
|
| Richard G. Thornberry
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on February 28, 2020,26, 2021, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Name | | Title |
| /s/ RICHARD G. THORNBERRY | | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director |
| Richard G. Thornberry | | |
| | |
| /s/ J. FRANKLIN HALL | | Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
| J. Franklin Hall | | |
| | |
| /s/ ROBERT J. QUIGLEY | | SeniorExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller
(Principal |
| Robert J. Quigley | | |
| | |
| /s/ HERBERT WENDER | | Non-Executive Chairman of the Board |
| Herbert Wender | | |
| | |
/s/ DAVID C. CARNEY | | Director |
David C. Carney | | |
| | |
| /s/ BRAD L. CONNER | | Director |
| Brad L. Conner | | |
| | |
| /s/ HOWARD B. CULANG | | Director |
| Howard B. Culang | | |
| | |
| /s/ DEBRA HESS | | Director |
| Debra Hess | | |
| | |
| /s/ LISA W. HESS | | Director |
| Lisa W. Hess | | |
| | |
| /s/ LISA MUMFORD | | Director |
| Lisa Mumford | | |
| | |
| /s/ GAETANO MUZIO | | Director |
| Gaetano Muzio | | |
| | |
| /s/ GREGORY V. SERIO | | Director |
| Gregory V. Serio | | |
| | |
| /s/ NOEL J. SPIEGEL | | Director |
| Noel J. Spiegel | | |
|
| |
Index to Financial Statement Schedules |
| Page |
Financial Statement Schedules | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
All other schedules are omitted because the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules, or because the information required is included in our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto.
Radian Group Inc. and Its Consolidated Subsidiaries
Schedule I
Summary of Investments—Other Than Investments in Related Parties
December 31, 20192020
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | Amortized
Cost | | Allowance for Credit Losses | | Fair Value | | Amount Reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet |
| Type of Investment | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bonds: | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | | $ | 176,033 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 174,099 | | | | $ | 174,099 | | |
| State and municipal obligations | | 149,258 | | | 0 | | | 165,271 | | | | 165,271 | | |
| Corporate bonds and notes | | 2,832,350 | | | (948) | | | 3,078,415 | | | | 3,078,415 | | |
| RMBS | | 799,814 | | | 0 | | | 833,939 | | | | 833,939 | | |
| CMBS | | 645,071 | | | 0 | | | 681,265 | | | | 681,265 | | |
| CLO | | 569,173 | | | 0 | | | 568,558 | | | | 568,558 | | |
| Other ABS | | 249,988 | | | 0 | | | 252,457 | | | | 252,457 | | |
| Foreign government and agency securities | | 5,100 | | | 0 | | | 5,438 | | | | 5,438 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total securities available for sale | | 5,426,787 | | | (948) | | | 5,759,442 | | (1) | | 5,759,442 | | (1) |
| Trading securities | | 260,863 | | | 0 | | | 290,983 | | (2) | | 290,983 | | (2) |
| Equity securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stocks | | 166,721 | | | 0 | | | 172,539 | | | | 172,539 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total equity securities | | 166,721 | | | 0 | | | 172,539 | | (3) | | 172,539 | | (3) |
Short-term investments (4) | | 618,014 | | | 0 | | | 618,004 | | | | 618,004 | | |
| Other invested assets | | 3,145 | | | 0 | | | 4,973 | | | | 4,973 | | |
| Total investments other than investments in related parties | | $ | 6,475,530 | | | $ | (948) | | | $ | 6,845,941 | | | | $ | 6,845,941 | | |
(1)Includes $36.1 million of fixed-maturity securities available for sale loaned under securities lending agreements that are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
(2)Includes $0.1 million of trading securities loaned under securities lending agreements that are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
(3)Includes $21.3 million of equity securities loaned under securities lending agreements that are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
(4)Includes cash collateral held under securities lending agreements of $15.6 million that is reinvested in money market instruments.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Type of Investment | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Amount Reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | |
| (In thousands) | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale: | | | | | | |
| Bonds: | | | | | | |
| U.S. government and agency securities | $ | 198,613 |
| | $ | 199,928 |
| | $ | 199,928 |
| |
| State and municipal obligations | 112,003 |
| | 119,994 |
| | 119,994 |
| |
| Corporate bonds and notes | 2,136,819 |
| | 2,241,280 |
| | 2,241,280 |
| |
| RMBS | 766,429 |
| | 779,354 |
| | 779,354 |
| |
| CMBS | 593,647 |
| | 608,015 |
| | 608,015 |
| |
| Other ABS | 760,785 |
| | 759,129 |
| | 759,129 |
| |
| Foreign government and agency securities | 5,091 |
| | 5,224 |
| | 5,224 |
| |
| Total securities available for sale | 4,573,387 |
| | 4,712,924 |
| | 4,712,924 |
| |
| Trading securities | 297,505 |
| | 317,150 |
| | 317,150 |
| |
| Equity securities: | | | | | | |
| Common stocks | 153,023 |
| | 157,685 |
| | 157,685 |
| |
| Total equity securities | 153,023 |
| | 157,685 |
| | 157,685 |
| |
Short-term investments (1) | 533,184 |
| | 533,358 |
| | 533,358 |
| |
| Other invested assets | 1,756 |
| | 4,072 |
| | 4,072 |
| |
| Total investments other than investments in related parties | $ | 5,558,855 |
| | $ | 5,725,189 |
| (2) | $ | 5,725,189 |
| (2) |
______________________
| |
(1) | Includes cash collateral held under securities lending agreements of $25.6 million that is reinvested in money market instruments. |
| |
(2) | Includes $24.0 million of fixed maturity securities available for sale, $27.5 million of equity securities and $14.9 million of short-term securities loaned under securities lending agreements that are classified as other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. |
Radian Group Inc.
Schedule II—Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Balance Sheet
Parent Company Only
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Assets | | | | |
| Investments | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale—at fair value (amortized cost of $836,191 and $429,999) | | $ | 844,393 | | | $ | 430,442 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Equity securities—at fair value (cost of $0 and $13,280) | | 0 | | | 13,381 | |
| Short-term investments—at fair value | | 233,569 | | | 162,363 | |
| Other invested assets—at fair value | | 3,000 | | | 1,500 | |
| Total investments | | 1,080,962 | | | 607,686 | |
| Cash | | 20,141 | | | 23,534 | |
| | | | |
| Investment in subsidiaries, at equity in net assets (Note C) | | 4,545,508 | | | 4,413,065 | |
| | | | |
| Accounts and notes receivable | | 300,656 | | | 100,775 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Other assets (Note C) | | 75,305 | | | 113,917 | |
| Total assets | | $ | 6,022,572 | | | $ | 5,258,977 | |
| | | | |
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Liabilities: | | | | |
| Senior notes | | $ | 1,405,674 | | | $ | 887,110 | |
| | | | |
| Net deferred tax liability (Note A) | | 272,868 | | | 253,739 | |
| Other liabilities | | 59,677 | | | 69,405 | |
| Total liabilities | | 1,738,219 | | | 1,210,254 | |
| Common stockholders’ equity | | | | |
| Common stock: par value $0.001 per share; 485,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2020 and 2019; 210,130 and 219,123 shares issued at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively; 191,606 and 201,164 shares outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | | 210 | | | 219 | |
| Treasury stock, at cost: 18,524 and 17,959 shares at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively | | (910,115) | | | (901,657) | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | 2,245,897 | | | 2,449,884 | |
| Retained earnings | | 2,684,636 | | | 2,389,789 | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | 263,725 | | | 110,488 | |
| Total common stockholders’ equity | | 4,284,353 | | | 4,048,723 | |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 6,022,572 | | | $ | 5,258,977 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| (In thousands, except per-share amounts) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Assets | | | |
| Investments | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale—at fair value (amortized cost of $429,999 and $320,746) | $ | 430,442 |
| | $ | 321,401 |
|
| Trading securities—at fair value (amortized cost of $0 and $55,948) | — |
| | 56,011 |
|
| Equity securities—at fair value (cost of $13,280 and $29,387) | 13,381 |
| | 29,375 |
|
| Short-term investments—at fair value | 162,363 |
| | 238,185 |
|
| Other invested assets—at fair value | 1,500 |
| | — |
|
| Total investments | 607,686 |
| | 644,972 |
|
| Cash | 23,534 |
| | 32,352 |
|
| Investment in subsidiaries, at equity in net assets (Note C) | 4,413,065 |
| | 3,927,268 |
|
| Accounts and notes receivable | 100,775 |
| | 101,072 |
|
| Federal income taxes recoverable, net—current | — |
| | 49,381 |
|
| Other assets (Note C) | 113,917 |
| | 58,993 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 5,258,977 |
| | $ | 4,814,038 |
|
| | | | |
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | |
| Senior notes | $ | 887,110 |
| | $ | 1,030,348 |
|
| Federal income taxes—deferred (Note A) | 253,739 |
| | 243,341 |
|
| Other liabilities | 69,405 |
| | 51,634 |
|
| Total liabilities | 1,210,254 |
| | 1,325,323 |
|
| | | | |
| Common stockholders’ equity | | | |
| Common stock: par value $.001 per share; 485,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2019 and 2018; 219,123 and 231,132 shares issued at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively; 201,164 and 213,473 shares outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | 219 |
| | 231 |
|
| Treasury stock, at cost: 17,959 and 17,660 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | (901,657 | ) | | (894,870 | ) |
| Additional paid-in capital | 2,449,884 |
| | 2,724,733 |
|
| Retained earnings | 2,389,789 |
| | 1,719,541 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 110,488 |
| | (60,920 | ) |
| Total common stockholders’ equity | 4,048,723 |
| | 3,488,715 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 5,258,977 |
| | $ | 4,814,038 |
|
See Supplemental Notes.
F-2
Radian Group Inc.
Schedule II—Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Statements of Operations
Parent Company Only
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Revenues: | | | | | |
| Net investment income | $ | 19,751 |
| | $ | 21,294 |
| | $ | 22,528 |
|
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | 12,863 |
| | (470 | ) | | (328 | ) |
| Other income | 218 |
| | — |
| | 80 |
|
| Total revenues | 32,832 |
| | 20,824 |
| | 22,280 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 22,738 |
| | — |
| | 51,469 |
|
| Interest expense | — |
| | 17,805 |
| | 18,033 |
|
| Total expenses (Note B) | 22,738 |
| | 17,805 |
| | 69,502 |
|
| Pretax income (loss) | 10,094 |
| | 3,019 |
| | (47,222 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | (19,997 | ) | | (3,319 | ) | | (141,437 | ) |
| Equity in net income of affiliates | 642,218 |
| | 599,673 |
| | 26,873 |
|
| Net income | 672,309 |
| | 606,011 |
| | 121,088 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 171,408 |
| | (86,953 | ) | | 35,480 |
|
| Comprehensive income | $ | 843,717 |
| | $ | 519,058 |
| | $ | 156,568 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Revenues: | | | | | | |
| Net investment income | | $ | 19,459 | | | $ | 19,751 | | | $ | 21,294 | |
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | | 5,682 | | | 12,863 | | | (470) | |
| Other income | | 101 | | | 218 | | | 0 | |
| Total revenues | | 25,242 | | | 32,832 | | | 20,824 | |
| | | | | | |
| Expenses: | | | | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | 0 | | | 22,738 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 17,805 | |
| Other operating expenses | | 2,619 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Total expenses (Note B) | | 2,619 | | | 22,738 | | | 17,805 | |
| Pretax income | | 22,623 | | | 10,094 | | | 3,019 | |
| Income tax benefit | | (3,165) | | | (19,997) | | | (3,319) | |
| Equity in net income of affiliates | | 367,838 | | | 642,218 | | | 599,673 | |
| Net income | | 393,626 | | | 672,309 | | | 606,011 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | 153,237 | | | 171,408 | | | (86,953) | |
| Comprehensive income | | $ | 546,863 | | | $ | 843,717 | | | $ | 519,058 | |
See Supplemental Notes.
F-3
Radian Group Inc.
Schedule II—Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Parent Company Only
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (1) | | $ | (13,741) | | | $ | 143,664 | | | $ | 254,698 | |
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from sales of: | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | | 304,737 | | | 296,171 | | | 6,779 | |
| Trading securities | | 0 | | | 56,787 | | | 0 | |
| Equity securities | | 13,401 | | | 16,916 | | | 0 | |
| Proceeds from redemptions of: | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | | 238,161 | | | 149,767 | | | 12,391 | |
| Trading securities | | 0 | | | 114 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | |
| Purchases of: | | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | | (691,874) | | | (293,284) | | | (37,552) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Sales, redemptions and (purchases) of : | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments, net | | (53,024) | | | 157,045 | | | (131,164) | |
| Other assets, net | | (6,068) | | | (6,958) | | | (3,317) | |
| Capital distributions from subsidiaries | | 19,000 | | | 6,000 | | | 0 | |
| Capital contributions to subsidiaries | | (5,050) | | | (65,879) | | | (30,338) | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | (180,717) | | | 316,679 | | | (183,201) | |
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | |
| Dividends paid | | (97,458) | | | (2,061) | | | (2,140) | |
| Issuance of senior notes, net | | 515,567 | | | 442,439 | | | 0 | |
| Repayments and repurchases of senior notes | | 0 | | | (610,763) | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | |
| Issuance of common stock | | 1,553 | | | 2,416 | | | 1,385 | |
| Repurchases of common shares | | (226,305) | | | (300,201) | | | (50,053) | |
| Credit facility commitment fees paid | | (2,292) | | | (989) | | | (1,510) | |
| | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 191,065 | | | (469,159) | | | (52,318) | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | | 0 | | | (2) | | | 0 | |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash | | (3,393) | | | (8,818) | | | 19,179 | |
| Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period | | 23,534 | | | 32,352 | | | 13,173 | |
| Cash and restricted cash, end of period | | $ | 20,141 | | | $ | 23,534 | | | $ | 32,352 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (In thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (1) | $ | 143,664 |
| | $ | 254,698 |
| | $ | (23,654 | ) |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
| Proceeds from sales of: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | 296,171 |
| | 6,779 |
| | 58,007 |
|
| Trading securities | 56,787 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Equity securities | 16,916 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from redemptions of: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | 149,767 |
| | 12,391 |
| | 60,414 |
|
| Trading securities | 114 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Purchases of: | | | | | |
| Fixed-maturities available for sale | (293,284 | ) | | (37,552 | ) | | (134,456 | ) |
| Sales, redemptions and (purchases) of : | | | | | |
| Short-term investments, net | 157,045 |
| | (131,164 | ) | | 210,529 |
|
| Other assets, net | (6,958 | ) | | (3,317 | ) | | (1,107 | ) |
| Capital distributions from subsidiaries | 6,000 |
| | — |
| | 924 |
|
| Capital contributions to subsidiaries | (65,879 | ) | | (30,338 | ) | | (21,643 | ) |
| (Issuance) repayment of note receivable from affiliate | — |
| | — |
| | (44 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 316,679 |
| | (183,201 | ) | | 172,624 |
|
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
| Dividends paid | (2,061 | ) | | (2,140 | ) | | (2,154 | ) |
| Issuance of senior notes, net | 442,439 |
| | — |
| | 442,163 |
|
| Repayments and repurchases of senior notes | (610,763 | ) | | — |
| | (593,527 | ) |
| Proceeds from termination of capped calls | — |
| | — |
| | 4,208 |
|
| Issuance of common stock | 2,416 |
| | 1,385 |
| | 7,132 |
|
| Repurchases of common shares | (300,201 | ) | | (50,053 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Credit facility commitment fees paid | (989 | ) | | (1,510 | ) | | (1,993 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (469,159 | ) | | (52,318 | ) | | (144,177 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and restricted cash | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash | (8,818 | ) | | 19,179 |
| | 4,793 |
|
| Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period | 32,352 |
| | 13,173 |
| | 8,380 |
|
| Cash and restricted cash, end of period | $ | 23,534 |
| | $ | 32,352 |
| | $ | 13,173 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | Includes cash distributions received from subsidiaries of $26.6 million, $55.4 million and $24.3 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Excludes non-cash distributions received from subsidiaries of $362.4 million, $394.6 million and $197.3 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
See Supplemental Notes.
F-4
Radian Group Inc.
Schedule II—Financial Information of Registrant
Parent Company Only
Supplemental Notes
Note A
The Radian Group Inc. (the “Parent Company”, “we” or “our”) financial statements represent the stand-alone financial statements of the Parent Company. These financial statements have been prepared on the same basis and using the same accounting policies as described in the consolidated financial statements included herein, except that the Parent Company uses the equity-method of accounting for its majority-owned subsidiaries. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto.
See Notes 12 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Parent Company’s debt obligations and capital stock.
The Parent Company has entered into the following intercompany guarantees with certain of our subsidiaries:
■Radian Group and Radian Mortgage Assurance are parties to a guaranty agreement, which provides that Radian Group will make sufficient funds available to Radian Mortgage Assurance to ensure that Radian Mortgage Assurance has a minimum of $5.0 million of statutory policyholders’ surplus every calendar quarter. Radian Mortgage Assurance had $8.8$8.7 million of statutory policyholders’ surplus and 0 RIF exposure as of December 31, 2019.2020.
■To allow our mortgage insurance customers to comply with applicable securities regulations for issuers of ABS (including mortgage-backed securities), Radian Group has guaranteed 2 structured transactions for Radian Guaranty with $79.3$73.2 million of aggregate remaining credit exposure as of December 31, 2019.
Radian Group and Radian Guaranty Reinsurance are parties to an Assumption and Indemnification Agreement with regard to obligations under our tax-sharing arrangements. Pursuant to this agreement, Radian Group is required to assume certain obligations that arise as a result of our tax-sharing arrangement.2020.
As of December 31, 2019,2020, Radian Group recorded a net deferred tax liability of $253.7$272.9 million. This balance includes liabilities related to certain of our subsidiaries, which have incurred federal NOLs that could not be carried-back and utilized on a separate company tax return basis. As a result, we are not currently obligated under our tax-sharing agreement to reimburse these subsidiaries for their separate company federal NOL carryforward. However, if in a future period one of these subsidiaries utilizes its share of federal NOL carryforwards on a separate entity basis, then Radian Group may be obligated to fund such subsidiary’s share of our consolidated tax liability to the IRS.
Note B
The Parent Company provides certain services to its subsidiaries. The Parent Company allocates to its subsidiaries expenses it incurs in the capacity of supporting those subsidiaries, including operating expenses, which are allocated based on the forecasted annual percentage of total revenue, which approximates the estimated percentage of time spent on certain subsidiaries, and interest expense, which is allocated based on relative capital. These expenses are presented net of allocations in the Statements of Operations. Substantially all operating expenses and interest expense, have been allocated to the subsidiaries for 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017.2018.
Amounts allocated to the subsidiaries for expenses are based on actual cost, without any mark-up. The Parent Company considers these charges fair and reasonable. The subsidiaries generally reimburse the Parent Company for these costs in a timely manner, which has the impact of temporarily improving the cash flows of the Parent Company, if accrued expenses are reimbursed prior to actual payment.
The following table shows the components of our Parent Company expenses that have been allocated to our subsidiaries for the periods indicated:indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Allocated operating expenses | $ | 124,412 |
| | $ | 94,815 |
| | $ | 72,764 |
|
| Allocated interest expense | 53,692 |
| | 42,195 |
| | 44,686 |
|
| Total allocated expenses | $ | 178,104 |
| | $ | 137,010 |
| | $ | 117,450 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in thousands) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Allocated operating expenses | | $ | 129,870 | | | $ | 124,412 | | | $ | 94,815 | |
| Allocated interest expense | | 68,938 | | | 53,692 | | | 42,195 | |
| Total allocated expenses | | $ | 198,808 | | | $ | 178,104 | | | $ | 137,010 | |
Note C
During 2018, the Services segment2020, certain non-insurance subsidiaries had not generated sufficient cash flow to reimburse the Parent Company for its share of its direct and allocated operating expenses, and interest expense, and therefore the Parent Company effectively contributed $66.1a total of $116.8 million to Clayton Group Holdings Inc.these subsidiaries to reflect the impairment of the interest receivable on the Clayton Intercompany Note of $17.8 million and the outstanding intercompany receivable balance of $48.3 millionreceivables representing unreimbursed direct and allocated costs.
See Note 1816 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to capital transactions between the Parent Company and its consolidated insurance subsidiaries.
Radian Group Inc.
Schedule IV—Reinsurance
Insurance Premiums Earned
Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ($ in thousands) | Gross Amount | | Ceded to Other Companies | | Assumed from Other Companies | | Net Amount | | Assumed
Premiums as a
Percentage
of Net
Premiums |
| 2019 | $ | 1,244,870 |
| | $ | 109,903 |
| | $ | 10,382 |
| | $ | 1,145,349 |
| | 0.91 | % |
| 2018 | $ | 1,074,298 |
| | $ | 67,195 |
| | $ | 6,904 |
| | $ | 1,014,007 |
| | 0.68 | % |
| 2017 | $ | 990,016 |
| | $ | 57,271 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 932,773 |
| | 0.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ in thousands) Premiums Earned | | Gross
Amount | | Ceded
to Other
Companies | | Assumed
from Other
Companies | | Net
Amount | | Assumed Premiums as a Percentage of Net Premiums |
| 2020 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage Insurance | | $ | 1,263,684 | | | $ | 183,130 | | | $ | 12,213 | | | $ | 1,092,767 | | | 1.12 | % |
| Title Insurance | | 22,843 | | | 289 | | | 0 | | | 22,554 | | | 0.00 | % |
| Total | | $ | 1,286,527 | | | $ | 183,419 | | | $ | 12,213 | | | $ | 1,115,321 | | | 1.10 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage Insurance | | $ | 1,233,528 | | | $ | 109,696 | | | $ | 10,382 | | | $ | 1,134,214 | | | 0.92 | % |
| Title Insurance | | 11,342 | | | 207 | | | 0 | | | 11,135 | | | 0.00 | % |
| Total | | $ | 1,244,870 | | | $ | 109,903 | | | $ | 10,382 | | | $ | 1,145,349 | | | 0.91 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage Insurance | | $ | 1,066,860 | | | $ | 67,047 | | | $ | 6,904 | | | $ | 1,006,717 | | | 0.69 | % |
| Title Insurance | | 7,438 | | | 148 | | | 0 | | | 7,290 | | | 0.00 | % |
| Total | | $ | 1,074,298 | | | $ | 67,195 | | | $ | 6,904 | | | $ | 1,014,007 | | | 0.68 | % |
