UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
þAnnual Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 20152016
o
Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Commission file number 1-32583 
 
FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in Its Charter) 
 
 
Delaware13-3391527
(State or Other Jurisdiction(I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation or Organization)Identification No.)
 4670 S. Fort Apache Rd., Suite 190, Las Vegas, Nevada 89147
(Address and zip code of principal executive offices)
(702) 221-7800
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
 
Common Stock, $0.0001 per ShareThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(Title of Each Class)(Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered)
 Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None
(Title of class)
  
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes  þ      No  o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o     Accelerated Filer o      Non Accelerated Filer o      Smaller reporting company  þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
 
The aggregate market value of Registrant’s voting $0.0001 par value common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, as of June 30, 2015,2016, was: $31,678,891.$35.1 million.  As of March 25, 2016,14, 2017, there were 18,969,39622,864,963 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

 Documents Incorporated By Reference
The information required by Part III of this Form 10-K, to the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2016,2017, which definitive proxy statement is anticipated to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the Registrant's fiscal year.






FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
  
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
  
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
  
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
  
   
 
   
 
 

2




PART I
 
Forward Looking Statements
 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to our financial condition, profitability, liquidity, resources, business outlook, market forces, corporate strategies, contractual commitments, legal matters, capital requirements and other matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. We note that many factors could cause our actual results and experience to change significantly from the anticipated results or expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. When words and expressions such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” “objectives,” “goals,” “aims,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “possible,” “seeks,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “might,” “likely,” “enable,” or similar words or expressions are used in this Form 10-K, as well as statements containing phrases such as “in our view,” “there can be no assurance,” “although no assurance can be given,” or “there is no way to anticipate with certainty,” forward-looking statements are being made.
 
Various risks and uncertaintiesmatters may affect the operation, performance, development and results of our business and could cause future outcomes to change significantly from those set forth in our forward-looking statements, including the following risks, uncertainties and other factors:
indebtedness and projected borrowing risks;
substantial dilution risks related to our present indebtednessoutstanding warrants and projected borrowings;options;
our growth strategies, including potential acquisitions and investments;
challenges regarding the successful integration of acquisitions;
risks related to development and construction activities;activities risks;
some of our casinos being on leased property;
changes into anticipated trends in the gaming industries;
changes in patron demographics;
general market and economic conditions including, but not limited to, the effects of local and national economic, housing and energy conditions on the economy in general and on the gaming and lodging industries in particular;
access to capital and credit, including our ability to finance future business requirements and to repay or refinance debt as it matures;
dependence on key personnel;
availability of adequate levels of insurance;
changes into federal, state, and local taxation and tax rates, and gaming taxation, and environmental laws, regulations and legislation, including obtaining and maintaining gaming and other licenses;licenses and approvals;
impactsevere weather;
lack of weather;alternative routes to certain of our properties;
competitive environment, including increased competition in our target market areas;
increases in the effective rate of taxation at any of our properties or at the corporate level; and
other risks, uncertainties and factors described from time to time in this and our other SEC filings and reports.









 
For a more detailed description of certain Risk Factors affecting our business, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of future developments, events or conditions. New risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ significantly from those forecast in any forward-looking statements. 


3




Item 1. Business.
 
Introduction
 
Formed as a Delaware corporation on January 5,in 1987, Full House Resorts, Inc. ("Full House") owns, leases, operates, develops, manages, and/or invests in casinos and related hospitality entertainment and relatedentertainment facilities. References in this document to “Full House”, the “Company”, “we”, “our,” or “us” refer to Full House Resorts, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where stated or the context otherwise indicates.
 
The following table presents selected statistical and other information concerning our properties as of December 31, 2015:2016:
 
Property
 
Acquisition
Date
 
 
Location
 
Slot
Machines
 
Table
Games
 
Hotel
Rooms
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel (owned) 2012 
Hancock County, MS
(near New Orleans)
 955 29 
129(1)
Rising Star Casino Resort (owned) 2011 
Rising Sun, IN
(near Cincinnati)
 944 25 
294(2)
Stockman’s Casino (owned) 2007 
Fallon, NV
(one hour east of Reno)
 235 4 
Grand Lodge Casino (leased and part of the Hyatt Regency Lake Tahoe Resort) 2011 
Incline Village, NV
(North Shore of Lake Tahoe)
 255 20 (3)
 
Property
 
Acquisition
Date
 
 
Location
 
Slot
Machines
 
Table
Games
 
Hotel
Rooms
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel 2012 
Hancock County, MS
(near New Orleans)
 955 28 
129(1)
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel 2016 
Cripple Creek, CO
(near Colorado Springs)
 807 12 24
Rising Star Casino Resort 2011 
Rising Sun, IN
(near Cincinnati)
 939 25 
294(2)
Stockman’s Casino 2007 
Fallon, NV
(one hour east of Reno)
 232 4 
Grand Lodge Casino (leased and part of the Hyatt Regency Lake Tahoe Resort) 2011 
Incline Village, NV
(North Shore of Lake Tahoe)
 253 16 (3)
(1)Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel opened its newly-constructed hotel in phases from May 2015 through September 2015.
(2)Includes a 190-room hotel that we own and operate, and an adjacent 104-room hotel that we lease pursuant to a capital lease.lease with a bargain purchase option.
(3)Under the Facilities Agreement with Hyatt Equities, L.L.C., we have the ability to provide rooms to our guests at the Hyatt Regency at Lake Tahoe Resort upon mutually agreeable rates, as well as other amenities and services that cater to our guests and support our operations. We also have an agreement with Hyatt to rent a villa for use by our designated casino guests. Hyatt has approximately 422 guest rooms.

We manage our casinos based on geographic regions within the United States.  Accordingly, Stockman’s Casino and Grand Lodge Casino comprise a Northern Nevada business segment, while Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel, Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel, and Rising Star Casino Resort and Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel are currently distinct segments.  We previously managed certain casinos owned by Native American tribesOur corporate headquarters are in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Our revenues are primarily derived from gaming sources, which include revenues from slot machines, table games and keno. Play at our slot machines accounts for most of our revenues, but we also consideroffer a wide range of table games. We set minimum and maximum betting limits for our fee-based casino developmentproperties based on market conditions, customer demand and management services asother factors. Our gaming revenues are derived from a segment, although nonebroad base of guests that includes both high- and low-stakes players. We also derive a significant amount of revenues from our hotel rooms, food and beverage outlets, retail outlets, entertainment and our golf course at the Rising Star Casino Resort. Our financial results are dependent upon the number of patrons that we attract to our properties and the amounts those guests spend per visit. Additionally, our operating results may be affected by, among other things, overall economic conditions affecting the disposable income of our current casinoguests, weather conditions affecting access to our properties, are managed for others.achieving and maintaining cost efficiencies, taxation and other regulatory changes, and competitive factors, including but not limited to, additions and improvement to the competitive supply of gaming facilities. We may experience significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to seasonality, variations in gaming hold percentages and other factors.

Our mission is to maximize shareholder value. We seek to increase revenues by providing our guests with their favorite games and amenities, high-quality customer service, and appropriate customer loyalty programs. Our customers include local value-oriented gaming customers who represent a high potential for repeat visits; generating customer satisfaction and loyaltyvisits along with this segment is a critical component of our strategy. We also have drive-in tourist patrons that we can entice for repeat visits.patrons. We continuously focus on improving the operating margins of our existing properties through a combination of top-line revenue growth and careful expense management. We also assess the potential impact of growth and development opportunities, which can includeincluding capital investments at our existing properties, the development of new properties, and the acquisition of existing third-party properties.

Play at our slot machines accounts for most of our revenues and income, but we also offer a wide range of table games. We set minimum and maximum betting limits for the properties based on market conditions, customer demand and other factors. Our gaming revenues are primarily derived from a broad base of guests that includes both high and low-stakes players.




All of our casino properties operateare operated by us 24 hours each day, every day of the year.  Our casino operations are managed by us.  We also manageoperate the hotel and food and beverage operations at Silver Slipper, Bronco Billy's, Rising Star and Stockman's. At the Grand Lodge Casino, Hyatt Regency manages the hotel and food and beverage operations.outlets.  

20152016 Highlights

Bronco Billy's Pending Acquisition and Amended and Restated Credit Facilities

On September 27, 2015, throughMay 13, 2016, we completed our wholly-owned subsidiary FHR-Colorado LLC, we entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement to acquire the operating assets and assume certain liabilitiesacquisition of Bronco Billy’sBilly's Casino and Hotel (“Bronco Billy’s”) in Cripple Creek, Colorado for consideration of $31.1 million. This acquisition diversifies our operations into a purchasenew geographical market.
Concurrent with the acquisition of Bronco Billy's, we entered into an amended and restated First Lien Credit Facility with a group of banks led by Capital One Bank, N.A., which includes a term loan of $45 million and revolving loan of $2 million. We also entered into an amended and restated Second Lien Credit Facility with ABC Funding, LLC which includes a term loan facility increase from $20 million to $55 million, of which the additional proceeds of $35 million were primarily used to complete our acquisition of Bronco Billy's.  As part of the amended and restated Second Lien Credit Facility, on May 13, 2016, the Company granted the second lien lenders 1,006,568 redeemable warrants.

Rights Offering

We completed a rights offering on November 10, 2016 and received a total of $5 million of gross proceeds ($4.64 million of net proceeds after offering costs) through the issuance of 3,846,154 shares of common stock at a price of $30 million, subject to an adjustment for working capital.$1.30 per share. We intend to financeuse the acquisition concurrent withnet proceeds from the refinancingrights offering to partially fund certain capital expenditure growth projects at our existing properties, as well as for general corporate purposes.

 For further information on the above, see the consolidated financial statements set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.
Operating Properties
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel
On October 1, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC (which owned the Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel) for approximately $72.2 million.  The Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel is situated on the far west end of the Mississippi Gulf Coast near Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, and has approximately 37,000 square feet of gaming space, a fine-dining restaurant, a buffet, a quick-service restaurant and two casino bars. The property sits at the western end of an approximately eight-mile-long white sand beach, the closest such beach to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge metropolitan areas. The Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel currently generates the most revenue and operating income of any of our outstanding firstproperties and second lien debt. Onits customers are primarily from communities in southern Louisiana, including the North Shore of Lake Pontchartrain and the New Orleans and Baton Rouge metropolitan areas, and southwestern Mississippi.

We lease approximately 38 acres, consisting of the seven-acre parcel on which the casino and hotel is situated and approximately 31 acres of marshlands. The lease term ends in April 2058. Between February 18, 2016,2019 and October 2027, we have the option to purchase the land. Management expects to exercise the buyout option depending on the Company's resources and future capital market conditions. During the third quarter of 2015, we completed the phased opening of our newly constructed 129-room hotel, which includes nine premium gaming customer suites. During 2017, we anticipate building a swimming pool and beach club, as well as a new food and beverage offering, at the property.

4


Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel

Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel was acquired in May 2016 for $31.1 million and includes three adjoining licensed operations in Cripple Creek, Colorado known as Bronco Billy's Casino, Buffalo Billy's Casino and Billy's Casino (collectively referred to as "Bronco Billy's"). Bronco Billy’s occupies a significant portion of the key city block of Cripple Creek’s prime “casino strip” and contains approximately 17,000 square feet of gaming space, 24 hotel rooms, a steakhouse and four casual dining outlets. Bronco Billy's also leases certain parking lots and buildings, including a portion of the hotel and casino, under a long-term lease. The lease has six renewal options in three-year increments to 2035 and the Company has the right to buy out the lease at any time during its term. Bronco Billy's customers are primarily from the Colorado LimitedSprings metropolitan area, the second-


largest metropolitan area in Colorado with a population of approximately 700,000. Its population increased approximately 1.7% between 2015 and 2016.
Rising Star Casino Resort
On April 1, 2011, we acquired all of the operating assets of Grand Victoria Casino & Resort, L.P. through Gaming Control Commission approved usEntertainment (Indiana) LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary. We paid approximately $43 million for the necessary licenses requiredproperty, including re-branding costs to rename the property Rising Star Casino Resort.  The property is located on the banks of the Ohio River in Rising Sun, Indiana, approximately one hour from Cincinnati, Ohio, and within two hours of Indianapolis, Indiana, and Louisville and Lexington, Kentucky. Rising Star offers approximately 40,000 square feet of casino space, a contiguous 190-room hotel, an adjacent leased 104-room hotel, five dining outlets and an 18-hole Scottish links golf course. The 104-room hotel is leased pursuant to a capital lease agreement which expires in 2027 and contains a bargain purchase option. During recent years, this property was adversely affected by the legalization of gaming in Ohio where several new competitors are now located. All of such potential casinos in Ohio are now open.

We are making significant improvements to the Rising Star facilities including a partial hotel refurbishment, the creation of a new VIP gaming room, sense-of-arrival improvements in the main pavilion and on the casino boat, construction of a new restaurant on the casino floor, and construction of an RV park. We are also in the process of developing a 10-car ferry boat service across the river to Kentucky. Commencement of the ferry boat service is subject to approvals from various agencies, including the Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Coast Guard.

Under Indiana regulations, we are allowed to have significantly greater casino gaming capacity than we utilize today. The Company has been exploring the possibility of relocating this excess gaming capacity to another location in Indiana. This would require legislative approval and there is no certainty that such approval will be received or, even if any proposed legislation were to become law, that the Company would be successful in developing a new gaming, lodging and entertainment facility.
Northern Nevada
Stockman’s Casino
We acquired Stockman’s Casino in Fallon, Nevada on January 31, 2007, for our pendingapproximately $27 million.  In 2008, we sold a Holiday Inn Express that was part of the original acquisition for approximately $7.2 million. Stockman’s Casino is located approximately one hour from Reno, Nevada and includes approximately 8,400 square feet of Bronco Billy’s.gaming space. The facility has a bar, a fine-dining restaurant and a coffee shop. Stockman's primarily serves the local market of Fallon and surrounding areas, including the nearby Naval Air Station, the United States Navy's premier air-to-air and air-to-ground training facility and home of the "Top Gun" school.

During the third quarter of 2016, we began construction on a number of exterior improvements to the property, including a new parking lot, a new digital marquee sign, lush landscaping surrounding the casino's main entrances, and new administrative offices connected directly to the casino. Construction work on the parking lot and new digital marquee sign was completed during the fourth quarter of 2016. We expect to complete our refinancing and close on the pending acquisition in the second quarter of 2016, subject to obtaining the remaining required regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. The transaction is not subject to a financing or due diligence condition, though we performed substantial due diligence prior to execution of the purchase and sale agreement. The Company made a $2.5 million deposit which would be forfeited under most circumstances if the transaction is not consummated.

Silver Slipper Hotel Completion

In September 2015, we completed our 129-room hotel overlooking the waterfront at the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel. The hotel opened in phases beginning in May 2015 and was fully completed in September 2015.enhancements during 2017.

Grand Lodge Casino Lease Amendment

On November 25, 2015,June 28, 2011, we andentered into a lease with Hyatt Equities, L.L.C. ("Hyatt") amended our lease through which weto operate the Grand Lodge Casino at the Hyatt Regency Lake Tahoe Resort Spa &and entered into an agreement with HCC Corporation to acquire the operating assets and certain liabilities related to the Grand Lodge Casino for approximately $1.4 million. The Grand Lodge Casino is located within the Hyatt Regency in Incline Village, Nevada ("on the north shore of Lake Tahoe and includes approximately 18,900 square feet of casino space.  The Hyatt Regency")Regency is one of three AAA Four Diamond hotels in the Lake Tahoe area, and is one of only three AAA Four Diamond hotels in northern Nevada. Its customers consist of both locals and tourists visiting the Lake Tahoe area.

  On November 25, 2015, the lease was amended to extend our relationship and work together to refurbish and improve the casino facility. The amendment included (i) an agreement for Hyatt to renovate the casino up to a maximum cost of $3.5 million and for the Company to purchase up to $1.5 million of new gaming devices, and equipment or other capital expenditures, and (ii) an increase in annual rentsmonthly rent from $1.5 million$125,000 to $1.75 million$145,833 commencing on January 1, 2017 (or the date which Hyatt's renovations are completed, whichever is later), and $166,667 commencing on January 1, 2018. The Company and Hyatt are working together on the refurbishment, which began in February 2017 and $2 millionis currently scheduled to be completed in 2018 and thereafter. June 2017.



The lease amendment also included, among other obligations, a five-year extension of the initial term of the lease to August 31, 2023. Hyatt has an2023 and deferral of Hyatt's option to purchase our leasehold interestsinterest and related operating assets subject to assumption of applicable liabilities, for their fair market value, plus Grand Lodge Casino’s earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for the twelve-month period preceding the acquisition (or pro-rated if less than twelve months remain on the lease) plus any positive working capital. Under the amendment, Hyatt agreed that it cannot exercise such extension prior to January 1, 2019. For the casino to continue in operation after such exercise, Hyatt or a replacement tenant would need to be licensed by the Nevada Gaming Commission.
 For further information on the above, see the consolidated financial statements set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

Board and Executive Transition

On November 28, 2014, Full House, and Daniel R. Lee, Bradley M. Tirpak and Craig W. Thomas (jointly and severally, the “Shareholder Group”), entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve actions taken by the Shareholder Group to call a special meeting of the Company’s shareholders for the purpose of, among other things, nominating certain individuals to our board of directors and amending the Company’s by-laws (the “Solicitation”).

The Settlement Agreement, and later the Amended Settlement Agreement, resulted in, among other items, the increase of our board of directors from five to eight members and related appointments, the resignation of Andre M. Hilliou and Mark J. Miller as directors, the Shareholder Group's irrevocable withdrawal of its solicitationSolicitation, and agreement to certain customary standstill restrictions, a mutual release of claims between the Company and the Shareholder Group, and certain reimbursements.

On January 9, 2015, in conjunction with the amendment of our existing credit facilities, Messrs. Hilliou’s and Miller’sMr. Hilliou's employment was terminated.  Mr. Hilliou had been the Company'sas Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Miller had been itsMiller's employment as Chief Operating Officer. Pursuant to the Separation Agreements, (i) all outstanding Company restricted stock held by Messrs. Hilliou and Miller (constituting 60,000 shares of common stock held by each) accelerated and vested in full as of their resignation and (ii) in connection with their terminations of employment, Messrs. Hilliou and Miller each received cash severance payments of $644,724 and $599,830, respectively, as well as other agreed upon company-paid benefits.Officer were terminated.

On November 28, 2014, we entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Lee (the “Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Lee serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer. The Employment Agreement was effective as of November 28, 2014 and expires on November 30, 2018, unless earlier terminated.

 For further information see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements set forth in “Item 8. Financial StatementsPrior Projects, Proposals and Supplementary Data”.


5



Operating PropertiesTerminations
 
Silver Slipper Casino & HotelAmerican Place

On October 1, 2012,In August 2015, we acquired allresponded to a "request for proposal" ("RFP") by the Indianapolis Airport Authority ("Airport Authority") with a proposal for a $650 million lifestyle complex, anchored by a modest-sized casino, known as "American Place". Under our proposal, we would act as the "master developer" (as such term is used in the RFP) of the outstanding membership interestsproject and plan to seek partners for many of its aspects. The project was contingent, among other things, on being selected by the Airport Authority; on changes in Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC (which owned the Silver Slipper Casino) forstate gaming laws and other regulatory approvals that would allow the relocation to Indianapolis of approximately $72.2 million, inclusive of net working capital, fees and expenses.  The Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel is situated on the far west endhalf of the Mississippi Gulf Coast in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, and has approximately 37,000 square feet of gaming space containing 955 slot machines, 29 table games and live keno. The property sits at the western end of an approximately eight-mile long white sand beach, the closest such beachdevices that are licensed to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge metropolitan areas. During the third quarter of 2015, we completed the phased opening of our newly constructed 129-room hotel, which includes nine premium gaming customer suites. We lease approximately 38 acres, consisting of the seven-acre parcel on which the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel is situated and approximately 31 acres of marshlands. We have the right to buy out the lease; such right can be exercised between February of 2019 and October 2027. Besides its casino and hotel, the property offers a fine dining restaurant, a buffet, a quick-service restaurant and two casino bars. Its customers are primarily from communities in southern Louisiana, including the New Orleans metropolitan area, and southwestern Mississippi.
Rising Star Casino Resort
On April 1, 2011, we acquired all of the operating assets of Grand Victoria Casino & Resort, L.P. through Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary. We paid approximately $43 million for the property, including working capital, fees and re-branding costs to rename the property as the Rising Star Casino Resort.  The property is located on the banks of the Ohio Riveroperate in Rising Sun, Indiana, approximately one hour from Cincinnati, Ohio,Indiana; and within two hours of Indianapolis, Indiana, and Louisville and Lexington, Kentucky. Rising Star offers approximately 40,000 square feet of casino space, including 944 slot and video poker machines and 25 table games. Under Indiana regulations, we are allowed to have significantly greater casino capacity than we operate today, but such capacity is not needed at Rising Staron obtaining financing for the current market demands. The Company has been exploringproposed project. In March 2016, the possibilityAirport Authority canceled the RFP process.

Terre Haute
In January 2017, State Senator Ford of relocating such excessTerre Haute, Indiana introduced legislation that would allow Full House to relocate half of its permitted gaming capacity to another location withina new casino to be developed in Terre Haute. Such development requires approval of both houses of the state. This would require legislativestate legislature and the approval or acquiescence of the governor. On February 16, 2017, the Public Policy Committee of the Indiana State Senate voted 5-5 on Senator Ford's bill; it required a majority vote to proceed to the Senate floor. There are other methods whereby the proposal could be considered by the broader legislature, although the Public Policy Committee is the normal and theremost expedient route. The legislature meets annually and is currently in session, with adjournment anticipated at the end of April. There is no certainty at this time that such approval wouldlegislation will ever become law or that such casino will ever be received. Rising Star also offers a contiguous 190-room hotel, a leased 104-room hotel, five dining outlets and an 18-hole Scottish links golf course.
Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC leases the 104-room hotel pursuant to a capital lease agreement which expires in 2027. At any time during the lease term, we have the exclusive option to purchase the hotel at a price based upon the project’s original cost of $7.7 million, reduced by the cumulative principal payments made by the Company during the lease term. At December 31, 2015, such price would have been approximately $6.2 million plus closing costs. Upon expiration of the lease term, if we have not yet exercised our option to purchase the hotel, either (i) the Landlord has the right to sell the hotel to us, or (ii) we have the option to purchase the hotel.  In either case, the purchase price is $1 plus closing costs.  The lease is not guaranteed by our parent company and the interest rates embedded in the lease are lower than the interest rates of our other debt. Therefore, management expects to continue the lease to its maturity and anticipates owning the hotel thereafter.developed.

Northern Nevada Casino Operations
Stockman’s Casino
We acquired Stockman’s Casino in Fallon, Nevada on January 31, 2007, for approximately $27 million, including fees and working capital.  In 2008, we sold a Holiday Inn Express that was part of the original acquisition for $7.2 million. Stockman’s Casino is located approximately one hour from Reno, Nevada and includes approximately 8,400 square feet of gaming space and 235 slot machines, 4 table games and keno. The facility has a bar, a fine dining restaurant and a coffee shop. Stockman's primarily serves the local market of Fallon and surrounding areas.

Grand Lodge Casino
On June 28, 2011, we entered into a lease with Hyatt Equities L.L.C. to operate the Grand Lodge Casino at the Hyatt Regency, and entered into an agreement with HCC Corporation to acquire the operating assets and certain liabilities related to the Grand Lodge Casino for approximately $1.4 million, including operating cash and working capital. The Grand Lodge Casino is located within Hyatt Regency in Incline Village, Nevada on the north shore of Lake Tahoe. It includes approximately 18,900 square feet of casino space featuring 255 slot machines and 20 table games, including a poker room.  The Hyatt Regency is one of two AAA Four Diamond hotels in the Lake Tahoe area, and is one of only three AAA Four Diamond hotels in northern Nevada. Its customers consist of both locals and tourists visiting the Lake Tahoe area.


6



The lease is secured by the Company’s interests under the lease and property, as defined, and is subordinate to the liens in the First and Second Lien Credit Facilities (defined below).  The lease was recently amended and is due to expire on August 31, 2023 and includes an option for the lessor to purchase the leasehold interest and the operating assets at the Grand Lodge Casino, subject to assumption of applicable liabilities, after January 1, 2019.  The lease has an option, subject to mutual agreement, to renew for an additional five-year term.

Recent Prior Projects
Buffalo Thunder Casino and Resort
 
From September 2011 to September 2014, we advised the Pueblo of Pojoaque on the operations of Buffalo Thunder Casino and Resort in Santa Fe, New Mexico, along with the Pueblo’s Cities of Gold and other gaming facilities. In aggregate, these gaming facilities included approximately 1,200 slot machines, 18 table games (including poker) and a simulcast area.
 
FireKeepers Casino
Until March 30, 2012, we owned 50% of Gaming Entertainment (Michigan), LLC, a joint venture with RAM Entertainment, LLC, a privately-held investment company.  Gaming Entertainment (Michigan), LLC had the exclusive right to provide casino management services at the FireKeepers Casino near Battle Creek, Michigan for the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi for seven years commencing August 5, 2009. On March 30, 2012, our joint venture which managed the FireKeepers Casino sold its interests to the FireKeepers Development Authority for $97.5 million.  In addition to the $97.5 million sale price, the FireKeepers Development Authority paid RAM Entertainment, LLC and us $1.2 million each.  Our gain on the sale was $41.2 million.
Terminated Transactions and AgreementsMajestic Star Agreement Termination
 
On March 21, 2014, we entered into an agreement with The Majestic Star Casino LLC ("Majestic Star") to acquire all of the outstanding membership interests of Majestic Mississippi, LLC, (“Majestic Mississippi”), which operates a casino located in Tunica, Mississippi commonly known as the Fitz Tunica Casino & Hotel.  On June 23, 2014, the agreement was terminated and on August 21, 2014, we settled all disputes related to this unconsummated matter by forfeiting $1.7 million in deposits. We also incurred additional acquisition relatedacquisition-related fees for this transaction, including $0.6 million of aborted registration costs associated with the attemptedpotential financing of the purchase.

On February 26, 2014, we entered into an exclusivity agreement with Keeneland Association, Inc. (“Keeneland”) to own, manage, and operate instant racing and, if authorized, traditional casino gaming at racetracks in Kentucky, subject to completion of definitive documents for each opportunity. On November 17, 2014, both parties agreed to terminate all agreements between us. The Company was reimbursed $0.2 million of costs incurred in connection with the matter.

For further information, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

Government Regulation
 
The ownership, management,gaming industry is highly regulated, and operationwe must maintain our licenses and pay gaming taxes to continue our operations. Each of gaming facilities areour casinos is subject to many federal, state, provincial, tribal and/or localextensive regulation under the laws, rules, and regulations and ordinances,of the jurisdiction in which are administered by the relevant regulatory agency or agencies in each jurisdiction.it is located. These laws, rules, and regulations and ordinances are different in each jurisdiction, but primarily deal withgenerally concern the responsibility, financial stability, and character of the owners, managers, and managers ofpersons with financial interests in the gaming operations as well as persons financially interested or involved in gaming operations.and include, without limitation, the following conditions and restrictions:
We may not own, manage or operate a gaming facility unless we obtain proper licenses, permitsPeriodic license fees and approvals. Applications for a license, permit or approval may generally be denied for reasonable cause. Most regulatory authorities license, investigate, and determine the suitability of any person who has a material relationship with us. Persons having material relationships include officers, directors, employees, and certain security holders.
Once obtained, licenses, permits, and approvalstaxes must be renewed from timepaid to timestate and generally are not transferable. Regulatory authorities may at any time revoke, suspend, condition, limit, or restrict a license for reasonable cause. License holders may be fined and, in some jurisdictions and under certain circumstances,local gaming operation revenues can be forfeited. We may be unable to obtain any licenses, permits, or approvals, or if obtained, they may not be renewed or may be revoked in the future. In addition, a rejection or termination of a license, permit, or approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect in other

7



jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions require gaming operators licensed in that state to receive their permission before conducting gaming in other jurisdictions.
The political and regulatory environment for gaming is dynamic and rapidly changing. The laws, regulations, and procedures dealing with gaming are subject to the interpretation of the regulatory authorities and may be amended. Any changes in such laws, regulations, or their interpretations could have a negative effect on our operations and future development of gaming opportunities. Certain specific provisions applicable to us are described below.  We believe that we are in material compliance with such governmental regulations in each jurisdiction in which we conduct business.
Nevada Regulatory Matters
In order to acquire, own or lease Stockman’s Casino, the Grand Lodge Casino or any other gaming operation in Nevada, we are subject to the Nevada Gaming Control Act and to the licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada Gaming Control Board, the Nevada Gaming Commission, and various local, city and county regulatory agencies.
The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada gaming authorities are based upon declarations of public policy which are concerned with, among other things:
the character of persons having any direct or indirect involvement with gaming to prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity;
establishment and application of responsible accounting practices and procedures;
maintenance of effective control over the financial practices and financial stability of licensees, including procedures for internal controls and the safeguarding of assets and revenues;
recordkeeping and reporting to the Nevada gaming authorities;
fair operation of games; and
the raising of revenues through taxation and licensing fees.
In May 2006, we applied for registration with the Nevada Gaming Commission as a publicly traded corporation, which was granted on January 25, 2007. The registration is not transferable and requires periodic payment of fees. The Nevada gaming authorities may limit, condition, suspend or revoke a license, registration, approval or finding of suitability for any cause deemed reasonable by the licensing agency. If a Nevada gaming authority determines that we violated gaming laws, then the approvals and licenses we hold could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked, and we, and the individuals involved, could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the gaming laws at the discretion of the Nevada Gaming Commission. Each type of gaming device, slot game, slot game operating system, table game or associated equipment manufactured, distributed, leased, licensed or sold in Nevada must first be approved by the Nevada Gaming Control Board and, in some cases, the Nevada Gaming Commission. We must regularly submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Certain loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions must also be reported to or approved by the Nevada Gaming Commission.
Certain officers, directors, key employees, and keygaming employees are required to be and have been, found suitablelicensed or otherwise approved by the Nevada Gaming Commission and employees associated with gaming authorities;
Individuals who must be registered as gaming employees, which are subject to immediate suspension under certain circumstances. An application for suitability may be denied for any cause deemed reasonable by the Nevada Gaming Commission. Changes in specified key positions must be reported to the Nevada Gaming Commission. In addition to its authority to deny an application for a license, the Nevada Gaming Commission has jurisdiction to disapprove a change in position by an officer, director or key employee. The Nevada Gaming Commission has the power to require licensed gaming companies to suspend or dismiss officers, directors or other key employees and to sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or whom the authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities.
The Nevada Gaming Commission may also require anyone having a material relationship or involvement with us to be found suitable or licensed, in which case those persons are required to pay the costs and fees of the Nevada Gaming Control Board in connection with the investigation. Any person who acquires more than 5% of any class of our voting securities must report the acquisition to the Nevada Gaming Commission; any person who becomes a beneficial owner of 10% or more of our voting securities is required to apply for a finding of suitability. Under certain circumstances, an “institutional investor,” as such term is defined in the regulations of the Nevada Gaming Commission, which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 25% of our voting securities, may apply to the Nevada Gaming Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability requirements, provided the institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. Additionally, an institutional investor may beneficially own more than 25%, but not more than 29%, of the voting securities if the ownership percentage results from a stock repurchase program. These institutional investors may not acquire any additional shares. An institutional investor will be deemed to hold voting securities

8



for investment purposes only if the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of our board of directors, any change in our corporate charter, by-laws, management, policies or operations, or any of our gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Nevada Gaming Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding our voting securities for investment purposes only.
Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Gaming Commission may be found unsuitable based solely on such failure or refusal. The same restrictions apply to a record owner if the record owner, when requested, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any security holder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the common stock beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada Gaming Commission may be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. We are subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a security holder or to have any other relationship with us, we:
pay that person any dividend or interest upon our voting securities;
allow that person to exercise, either directly or indirectly. any voting right conferred through securities held by that person, or;
give remuneration in any form to that person.

     If a security holder is found unsuitable, then we may be found unsuitable if we fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his or her voting securities for cash at fair market value.
The Nevada Gaming Commission may also, in its discretion, require any other holders of our debt or equity securities to file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own the debt or equity securities. The applicant security holder is required to pay all costs of such investigation. If the Nevada Gaming Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own such security, then pursuant to the regulations of the Nevada Gaming Commission, we may be sanctioned, including the loss of our approvals, if, without the prior approval of the Nevada Gaming Commission, we:
pay to the unsuitable person any dividends, interest or any distribution whatsoever;
recognize any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities;
pay the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or
make any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion exchange, liquidation or similar transaction.
We are required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Commission at any time, and to file with the Nevada Gaming Commission, at least annually, a list of our stockholders. The Nevada Gaming Commission has the power to require our stock certificates to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations of the Nevada Gaming Commission.
As a licensee or registrant, we may not make certain public offerings of our securities without the prior approval of the Nevada Gaming Commission.  Such approval, if given, does not constitute a recommendation or approval of the investment merits of the securities subject to the offering.  We have received a waiver of the prior approval requirement with respect to public offerings of securities subject to certain conditions.  Also, changes in control through merger, consolidation, acquisition of assets, management or consulting agreements or any form of takeover cannot occur without prior investigation by the Nevada Gaming Control Board and approval by the Nevada Gaming Commission.
The Nevada legislature has declared that some repurchases of voting securities, corporate acquisitions opposed by management, and corporate defense tactics affecting Nevada gaming licensees, and registered companies that are affiliated with those operations, may be harmful to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Nevada Gaming Commission has established a regulatory scheme to reduce the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada’s gaming industry and to further Nevada’s policy to:
assure the financial stability of corporate gaming licensees and their affiliates;
preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and
promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs.
Because we are a registered company, approvals may be required from the Nevada Gaming Commission before we can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above their current market price and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. The Nevada Gaming Control Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposedapproved by a registered company’s Board in response to a tender offer made directly to its stockholders for the purpose of acquiring control.

9



Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered, or who is under common control with those persons, collectively, “licensees,” and who proposes to become involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada, is required to deposit with the Nevada Gaming Control Board, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $30,000 to pay the expenses of investigation by the Nevada Gaming Control Board of the licensee’s participation in foreign gaming. We currently comply with this requirement. The revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease at the discretion of the Nevada Gaming Commission. Licensees are required to comply with the reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Gaming Control Act. A licensee is also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Gaming Commission if it:
knowingly violates any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming operation;
fails to conduct the foreign gaming operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations;
engages in any activity or enters into any association that is unsuitable because it poses an unreasonable threat to the control of gaming in Nevada, reflects or tends to reflect, discredit or disrepute upon the State of Nevada or gaming in Nevada, or is contrary to the gaming policies of Nevada;
engages in activities or enters into associations that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees; or
employs, contracts with or associates with a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or a finding of suitability in Nevada on the ground of unsuitability.
In May 2006, we adopted a compliance plan, which has been amended from time to time, and appointed a compliance committee in accordance with Nevada Gaming Commission requirements.  It currently consists of the following Company directors: Kenneth R. Adams (Chair and Independent Director), Carl G. Braunlich (Independent Director), Kathleen Marshall (Independent Director), W.H. Baird Garrett (Independent Director) and Daniel R. Lee.  Our compliance committee meets quarterly and is responsible for implementing and monitoring our compliance with Nevada regulatory matters, as well as other jurisdictions in which we operate. This committee will also review information and reports regarding the suitability of potential key employees or other parties who may be involved in material transactions or relationships with us.
Indiana Regulatory Matters
We own and operate a wholly-owned subsidiary, Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC, which acquired and operates Rising Star Casino Resort in Rising Sun, Indiana. The ownership and operation of casino facilities in Indiana are subject to extensive state and local regulation, including primarily the licensing and regulatory control of the Indiana Gaming Commission (“IGC”).  The IGC is given extensive powers and duties for administering, regulating and enforcing riverboat gaming in Indiana.
Pursuant to the Indiana Riverboat Gaming Act, as amended (the “Indiana Act”), the IGC is authorized to award up to 11 gaming licenses to operate riverboat casinos in the State of Indiana, including five to counties contiguous to Lake Michigan in northern Indiana, five to counties contiguous to the Ohio River in southern Indiana and one to a county contiguous to Patoka Lake in southern Indiana, which was subsequently relocated to French Lick, Indiana. In April 2007, the Indiana General Assembly enacted legislation that authorized the holders of two pari-mutuel racing permits located in Anderson and Shelbyville, Indiana to obtain gambling game licenses and install up to 2,000 slot machines at each facility (“racinos”). The IGC granted each horse track a five-year gaming license authorizing the use of such slot machines.  Installation of slot machines beyond the statutorily authorized number is allowed with further approval by the IGC. The slot operations at the racetracks opened in June of 2008. There is no similar cap on the number of gaming positions under each riverboat license, although the installation of additional tables and slots generally requires IGC approval. Historically, the IGC has generally permitted increases in gaming capacity, provided its concerns as to security and surveillance coverage are accommodated.  In November 2011, the IGC authorized Indiana Grand, located in Shelbyville, to install an additional 200 slot machines at its facility. In November 2012, the IGC authorized Hoosier Park, in Anderson, Indiana, to install an additional 200 slot machines at its facility. In 2015, the Indiana legislature passed legislation to allow table games at racetracks (which are now limited to slot machines) beginning in 2020.
The Indiana Act strictly regulates the facilities, persons, associations and practices related to gaming operations pursuant to the police powers of Indiana, including comprehensive law enforcement provisions. The Indiana Act vests the IGC with the power and duties of administering, regulating and enforcing the system of riverboat gaming in Indiana. The IGC’s jurisdiction extends to every person, association, corporation, partnership and trust involved in riverboat gaming operations in Indiana.
The Indiana Act requires the owner of a riverboat gaming operation to hold an owner’s license issued by the IGC. To obtain an owner’s license, the Indiana Act requires extensive disclosure of records and other information concerning an applicant.

10



Applicants for licensureauthority must submit a comprehensive application and personal disclosure forms and undergo an exhaustive background investigation, priorthe costs for which must be borne by the applicant;
Changes in any licensed or approved individuals must be reported to and/or approved by the issuance of a license. The applicant must also discloserelevant gaming authority;
Failure to timely file the identity of every person holding an ownership interestrequired application forms by any individual required to be approved by the relevant gaming authority may result in that individual’s denial and the applicant. The IGC hasgaming licensee may be required by the gaming authority to request specific information on or license anyone holding an ownership interest.  An ownership interest in a licensee may only be transferred in accordancedisassociate with the Indiana Actthat individual; and the rules promulgated thereunder.
Each licenseIf any individual is a revocable privilege and is not a property right under the Indiana Act.   An Indiana riverboat license entitles the licensee to own and operate one riverboat and gaming equipment as part offound unsuitable by a gaming operation. The Indiana Act allows a person to hold up to 100% of up to two separate licenses. Each initial owner’s license runs for a period of five years. Thereafter,authority, the license is subject to renewal on an annual basis upon a determination by the IGC that the licensee continues to be eligible for an owner’s license pursuant to the Indiana Act and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder. A licensee may not lease, hypothecate, borrow money against or lend money against an owner’s riverboat gaming license. An ownership interest in an owner’s riverboat gaming license may only be transferred in accordance with the regulations promulgated under the Indiana Act.  Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC applied for and, on March 15, 2011, was granted the transfer of a riverboat owner’s license. Thereafter, Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC has renewed its license annually on September 15 of each year.
The Indiana Act requires that a licensed owner undergo a complete investigation every three years. If for any reason the license is terminated, the assets of the riverboat gaming operation cannot be disposed of without the approval of the IGC. Furthermore, the Indiana Act requires licensees to disclose the identity of all directors, officers and persons holding a beneficial ownership interest in the licensee, and the IGC may require licensure for such persons, as well as other key employees.  The IGC also requires a comprehensive disclosure of financial and operating information on licensees, their principal officers and their parent corporations.
If an institutional investor acquires 5% or more of any class of voting securities, the investor is required to notify the IGC and may be subject to a finding of suitability.  Institutional investors who acquire 15% or more of any class of voting securities are subject to a finding of suitability.  In addition, the IGC may require an institutional investor that acquires 15% or more of certain non-voting equity units to apply for a finding of suitability.  Any other person who acquires 5% or more of any class of voting securities of a licensee is required to apply for a findingdisassociate with that individual.

Violations of suitability.
The Indiana Act prohibits contributions to a candidate for a state, legislative, or local office, to a candidate’s committee or to a regular party by the holder of a riverboat owner’s license or a supplier’s license, by a politicalgaming laws in one jurisdiction could result in disciplinary action committeein other jurisdictions. A summary of the licensee, by an officer of a licensee, by an officer of a person that holds at least 1% interest in the licensee or by a person holding at least 1% interest in the licensee.
In 2009, the Indiana General Assembly enacted legislation requiring all casino operators to submit for approval by the IGC a written power of attorney identifying a person who would serve as a trustee to temporarily operate the casino in certain rare circumstances, such as the revocation or non-renewal of any owner’s license; the denial of an owner’s license to a proposed transferee and the person attempting to sell the riverboat is unable or unwilling to retain ownership or control; or a licensed owner agrees in writing to relinquish control of the riverboat. The IGC has developed a model power of attorney granting the trustee broad and exclusive authority to exercise and perform those acts and powers concerning real and personal property transactions, litigation, insurance, employees and making transactions.  The power of attorney, which each licensee is required to execute, also authorizes the trustee, on behalf of the licensee, to commence, manage, and consent to relief in a case involving the licensee under bankruptcy code without the consent of the licensee.  A riverboat’s owner has 180 days after the date that the resolution is adopted to sell the riverboat and its related properties to a suitable owner who is approved by the IGC.  If the owner is unable to sell the property within the timeframe, the trustee may take any action necessary to sell the property to a person who meets the requirements for licensure under the Indiana Act.  During the time period that the trustee is operating the casino operations, the trustee has exclusive and broad authority over the casino gambling operations.  The IGC most recently approved Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC’s power of attorney renewal on September 17, 2015.
The IGC has promulgated a rule mandating that licensees maintain a cash reserve.  The cash reserve is to be equal to a licensee’s average payout for a three-day period based on the riverboat’s performance during the prior calendar quarter. The cash reserve can consist of cash on hand, cash maintained in Indiana bank accounts and cash equivalents not otherwise committed or obligated. The IGC has also promulgated a rule that prohibits distributions, excluding distributions for the payment of state or federal taxes, by a licensee to its partners, shareholders, itself or any affiliated entity if the distribution would impair the financial viability of the riverboatgovernmental gaming operation.

11



The Indiana Act does not limit the maximum bet or loss per patron. Each licensee sets minimum and maximum wagers on its own games. Players must use chips or tokens as, according to the Indiana Act, wagering may not be conducted with money or other negotiable currency. No person under the age of 21 is permitted to wager, and wagers may only be taken from persons present at a licensed riverboat.
Contractsregulations to which Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLCwe are subject is a partyfiled as Exhibit 99.1 and is herein incorporated by reference.
Our businesses are subject to disclosure and approval processes imposed by Indiana regulations.  A riverboat owner licensee may not enter into or perform any contract or transaction in which it transfers or receives consideration which is not commercially reasonable or which does not reflect the fair market value of the goods or services rendered or received.  All contracts are subject to disapproval by the IGC. 

Through the establishment of purchasing goals, the IGC encourages minority business enterprises and women business enterprises to participate in the gaming industry. The goals must be derived from the statistical analysis of utilization studies of licensee contracts for goods and services. Failure to meet these goals will be scrutinized heavily by the IGC, and the Indiana Act authorizes the IGC to suspend, limit or revoke an owner’s gaming license or impose a fine for failure to comply with these guidelines. If a determination is made that a licensee has failed to demonstrate compliance with these guidelines, the licensee has 90 days from the date of the determination to comply.
Pursuant to a 2013 amendment to the graduated wagering tax law, riverboat licensees that received Adjusted Gross Receipts (“AGR”) under $75 million are subject to a graduated wagering tax with a starting tax rate of 5% for the first $25 million of AGR and a top rate of 40% for AGR in excess of $600 million. “AGR” is the total of all cash and property received from gaming less cash paid out as winnings and uncollectible gaming receivables (not to exceed 2%).
The 2013 legislation also permits riverboats and racinos to deduct amounts attributable to qualified wagering incentives from AGR.  Qualified wagering incentives refers to wagers made by patrons using non-cash vouchers, coupons, electronic credits or electronic promotions offered by the licensee and are commonly referred to as “free play”.  For the state fiscal years ending after June 30, 2013, and before July 1, 2016, the maximum amount of permitted deduction is $5 million.
In addition to the wagering tax, an admissions tax of $3 per admission is assessed. The Indiana Act provides for the suspension or revocation of a license if the wagering and admissions taxes are not timely submitted.
Pursuant to a development agreement between the Company and the City of Rising Sun, Indiana, we are required to pay annually 1.55% of AGR if $150 million or less, or 1.6% of AGR if greater than $150 million, to the Rising Sun Regional Foundation.
Real property taxes are imposed on riverboats at rates determined by local taxing authorities.  Income to us from Rising Star Casino Resort is also subject to the Indiana adjusted gross income tax and certain court decisions have resulted in gaming taxes not being deductible in the computation of Indiana income taxes.  Sales on a riverboat and at its related amenities, other than gaming revenues, are subject to applicable use, excise and retail taxes.  The Indiana Act requires a riverboat licensee to directly reimburse the IGC for the costs of gaming enforcement agents which are required to be present while gaming is conducted.
A licensee may enter into debt transactions of $1 million or greater only with the prior approval of the IGC. Such approval is subject to compliance with requisite procedures and a showing that each person with whom the licensee enters into a debt transaction would be suitable for licensure under the Indiana Act. Unless waived, approval of debt transactions requires consideration by the IGC at two business meetings. The IGC, by resolution, has authorized its executive director, subject to subsequent ratification by the IGC, to approve debt transactions after a review of the transaction documents and consultation with the IGC’s Chairman and the IGC’s financial consultant.
The IGC may subject a licensee to fines, suspension or revocation of its license for any act that is in violation of the Indiana Act or the regulations of the IGC or for any other fraudulent act. In addition, the IGC may revoke an owner’s license if the IGC determines that the revocation of the license is in the best interests of the State of Indiana. Limitation, conditioning, or suspension of any gaming license or approval or the directive to utilize its power of attorney could (and revocation of any gaming license or approval would) materially adversely affect us, our gaming operations and our results of operations.
The Indiana Act provides that the sale of alcoholic beverages at riverboat casinos is subject to licensing, control and regulation pursuant to Title 7.1 of the Indiana Code and the rules adopted by the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission.

12




Mississippi Regulatory Matters
In order to acquire, own and operate Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel or any other gaming operation in Mississippi, we are subject to the Mississippi Gaming Control Act (“Mississippi Act”) and to the licensing and regulatory control of the Mississippi Gaming Commission (“MGC”), the Mississippi Department of Revenue and various local, city and county regulatory agencies.
The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Mississippi gaming authorities are based upon declarations of public policy which are concerned with, among other things:
the character of persons having any direct or indirect involvement with gaming to prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity;
the establishment and application of responsible accounting practices and procedures;
maintenance of effective control over the financial practices and financial stability of licensees, including procedures for internal controls and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, including recordkeeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports to the MGC;
the prevention of cheating and fraudulent practices;
providing a source offederal, state, and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees; and
ensuring that gaming licensees, to the extent practicable, employ Mississippi residents.
The Mississippi Act provides for legalized gaming in each of the 14 counties that border the Gulf Coast or the Mississippi River; however, gaming is legal only if the voters in the county have not voted to prohibit gaming in that county. Currently, gaming is permissible in nine of the fourteen counties and occurs in all nine counties. Historically, the Mississippi Act required gaming vessels to be located on the Mississippi River or on navigable waterways in eligible counties along the Mississippi River or in waters along the Gulf Coast shore of the eligible counties. However, more recently, the Mississippi Act has been amended to permit licensees in the three counties along the Gulf Coast to establish land-based casino operations. Due to another change to the Mississippi Act, the MGC has also permitted licensees in approved river counties to conduct gaming operations on permanent structures, provided that the majority of any such structure is located on the river side of the “bank full” line of the Mississippi River.

We and any subsidiary we own that operates a casino in Mississippi are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the MGC. As the sole member of Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, a licensee of the MGC, we applied for registration with the MGC as a publicly traded corporation, which was granted on September 20, 2012. As a registered, publicly-traded corporation, we are required periodically to submit financial and operating reports, and any other information that the MGC may require. If we fail to satisfy the requirements of the Mississippi Act, we and our Mississippi subsidiary, Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, cannot own or operate gaming facilities in Mississippi. No person may receive any percentage of profits from a Mississippi gaming licensee without first obtaining the necessary licensing and approvals from the MGC. A Mississippi gaming licensee must maintain a gaming license from the MGC, subject to certain conditions, including continued compliance with all applicable state laws and regulations.
There are no limitations on the number ofregulations, in addition to gaming licenses that may be granted. Further, the Mississippi Act provides for 24-hour gaming operationsregulations. These laws and does not limit the maximum bet or loss per patron or the percentage of space that may be utilized for gaming. Gaming licenses are issued for a three-year period,regulations include, but are not transferable,limited to, restrictions and must be renewed periodically thereafter. There is no assurance that a new license can be obtained at the endconditions concerning alcoholic beverages, smoking, environmental matters, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, construction, land use, and marketing and advertising. We also deal with significant amounts of each three-year period of a license.  Moreover, the MGC may, at any time, and for any cause it deems reasonable, revoke, suspend, condition, limit or restrict a license.  Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel was most recently granted a renewal of its license by the MGC on June 18, 2015, effective July 20, 2015. The license expires on July 19, 2018.
If the MGC determines that we violated gaming laws, then the approvals and licenses we hold could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked, and we, our subsidiary, and the individuals involved, could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the gaming laws at the discretion of the MGC. Such limitation, conditioning, or suspension of any gaming license or approval could (and revocation of any gaming license or approval would) materially adversely affect us, our gaming operations and our results of operations.
Certain of our officers, directors and key employees are required to be, and have been, found suitable by the MGC and employees associated with gaming must obtain work permits which are subject to immediate suspension under certain circumstances. The MGC, at its discretion, may require additional persons to file applications for findings of suitability.  An application for suitability may be denied for any cause deemed reasonable by the MGC. Changes in specified key positions must

13



be reported to the MGC. In addition to its authority to deny an application for a license, the MGC has jurisdiction to disapprove a change in position by an officer, director or key employee. The MGC has the power to require licensed gaming companies to suspend or dismiss officers, directors or other key employees and to sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or whom the authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities. Determinations of suitability or questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Mississippi. We believe that we have obtained, applied for or are in the process of applying for all necessary findings of suitability with respect to such persons affiliated with us or Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, although the MGC, in its discretion, may require additional persons to file applications for findings of suitability.
The MGC may also require anyone having a material relationship or involvement with us to be found suitable or licensed, in which case those persons are required to pay the costs and fees in connection with the investigation. At any time, the MGC has the power to investigate and require the finding of suitability of any beneficial stockholders of record. The Mississippi Act requires that any person who acquires more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, as reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission, must report the acquisition to the MGC and such person may be required to be found suitable. Also, any person who becomes a beneficial owner of 10% or more of any class of our voting securities, as reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission, is required to apply for a finding of suitability by the MGC and must pay the costs and fees that the MGC incurs in conducting its investigation. If a stockholder who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information, including a list of beneficial owners.
The MGC generally has exercised its discretion to require a finding of suitability of any beneficial owner of 5% of any class of voting securities of a registered corporation. However, under certain circumstances, an “institutional investor”, as defined in the Mississippi gaming regulations, which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 15%, of the voting securities of a registered corporation, as reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission, may apply for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such investor holds the securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor will be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes only if the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of our board of directors, any changecash in our corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations or any of our gaming affiliates, or any other action which the MGC finds to be inconsistent with holding our voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities that are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes include (1) voting on all matters voted on by stockholders; (2) making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in the registered corporation’s management, policies or operations and (3) such other activities as the MGC may determine to be consistent with such investment intent.
Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the MGC may be found unsuitable based solely on such failure or refusal. The same restrictions apply to a record owner if the record owner, when requested, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any security holder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the common stock beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the MGC may be guilty of a misdemeanor. We are subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a security holder or to have any other relationship with us, we:
pay that person any dividend or interest upon our voting securities;
recognize the exercise, directly or indirectly of any voting right conferred through securities held by that person;
pay the unsuitable person any remuneration in any form for services rendered or otherwise, except in certain limited and specific circumstances; or
fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require the unsuitable person to divest himself of the securities including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of the securities for cash at fair market value. 
The MGC may require us to disclose the identities of the holders of our debt or other securities, and, in its discretion, require such holders to file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own any debt security of a registered corporation. Although the MGC generally does not require the individual holders of such securities to be investigated and found suitable, it retains the right to do so for any reason deemed necessary by the MGC. The applicant holder of any debt securities is required to pay all costs of such investigation.
If the MGC determines that a person is unsuitable to own such debt security, we may be sanctioned, including the loss of our approvals, if, without the prior approval of the MGC, we:
pay to the unsuitable person any dividends, interest or any distribution whatsoever;
recognize any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities;
pay the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or

14



make any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion; exchange, liquidation or similar transaction. 
Each Mississippi gaming subsidiary must maintain in Mississippi a current stock ledger with respect to the ownership of its equity securities. We also must maintain a current list of our shareholders, which must reflect the record ownership of each outstanding share of any class of our equity securities. The ledger and stockholder lists must be available for inspection by the MGC at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the MGC. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We must also render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner. The Mississippi Act requires that certificates representing securities of a registered corporation bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Mississippi Act and the regulations of the MGC. On September 20, 2012, we received a waiver of this legend requirement from the MGC. The MGC has the power to impose additional restrictions on the holders of our securities at any time.
Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by a registered corporation or a Mississippi gaming subsidiary must be reported to and approved by the MGC. A Mississippi gaming subsidiary may not make a public offering of its securities, but may pledge or mortgage casino facilities. A registered corporation may not make a public offering of its securities without the prior approval of the MGC if any part of the proceeds of the offering is to be used to finance the construction, acquisition, or operation of gaming facilities in Mississippi or to retire or extend obligations incurred for those purposes. Such approval, if given, does not constitute a recommendation or approval of the investment merits of the securities subject to the offering. We have received a waiver of the prior approval requirement with respect to public offerings and private placements of securities, subject to certain conditions.
A Mississippi gaming subsidiary may not guarantee a security issued by an affiliated company pursuant to a public offering, or pledge its assets to secure payment or performance of the obligations evidenced by a security issued by an affiliated company, without the prior approval of the MGC. A pledge of the stock of a Mississippi gaming subsidiary and the foreclosure of such a pledge are ineffective without the prior approval of the MGC. We have obtained approvals from the MGC for such guarantees, pledges and restrictions in connection with offerings of securities, subject to certain restrictions. 

Also, changes in control through merger, consolidation, acquisition of assets, management or consulting agreements or any form of takeover cannot occur without prior investigation and approval by the MGC.
The Mississippi legislature has declared that some repurchases of voting securities, corporate acquisitions opposed by management, and corporate defense tactics affecting Mississippi gaming licensees and registered corporations that are affiliated with those operations, may be harmful to stable and productive corporate gaming. The MGC has established a regulatory scheme to reduce the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Mississippi’s gaming industry and to further Mississippi’s policy to:
assure the financial stability of corporate gaming licensees and their affiliates;
preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and
promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs.
Because we are a registered corporation, approvals may be required from the MGC before we can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above their current market price and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. Mississippi gaming regulations also require prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by a registered corporation’s board of directors in response to a tender offer made directly to its stockholders for the purpose of acquiring control of the registered corporation.
Neither we nor Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC may engage in gaming activities in Mississippi while also conducting operations outside of Mississippi without approval of, or a waiver of such approval by, the MGC. The MGC may require determinations that there are means for the MGC to have access to information concerning us and our affiliates’ out-of-state gaming operations. We have approval from the MGC for foreign gaming operations in that such approval for foreign gaming operations is automatically granted under the Mississippi regulations in connection with foreign operations (except for internet gaming activities) conducted within the 50 states or any territory of the United States, or on board any cruise ship embarking from a port located therein. The MGC requires a formal foreign gaming waiver for involvement in internet gaming.
License, fees and taxes are payable to the State of Mississippi, the MGC, and the county and city in which our Mississippi subsidiary, Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC’s gaming operations are conducted. Depending on the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable either monthly, quarterly or annually. Gaming fees and tax calculations are generally based upon (1) a percentage of the gross gaming revenues received by the subsidiary operation; (2) the number of gaming devices operated by the casino; or (3) the number of table games operated by the casino. The license fee payable to the State of Mississippi is based

15



upon gross revenue (generally defined as gaming receipts less payout to customers as winnings) and equals 4% of gross revenue of $50,000 or less per calendar month, 6% of gross revenue in excess of $50,000 but less than $134,000 per calendar month, and 8% of gross revenue in excess of $134,000 per calendar month.  The Gaming Commission imposes a flat annual fee on each casino operator licensee, covering all investigative fees for that year associated with an operator licensee, any entity registered as a holding company or publicly traded corporation of that licensee, and any person required to be found suitable in connection with that licensee or any holding company or publicly-traded corporation of that licensee.  The annual fee is based on the average number of gaming devices operated by the licensee during a twelve-month period, as reported to the MGC.  The investigative fee is $325,000 for licensees with 1,500 or more gaming devices, $250,000 for licensees with 1,000 to 1,499 gaming devices, and $150,000 for licensees with less than 1,000 gaming devices.  The fee is payable in four equal quarterly installments.  During the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel operated an average of 955 gaming devices.
The sale of alcoholic beverages at our Mississippi gaming operation is subject to the licensing, control and regulation by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Division of the Mississippi Department of Revenue as well as local ordinances. If alcohol regulations are violated, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Division may limit, condition, suspend or revoke any license for the serving of alcoholic beverages or place such licensee on probation with or without conditions.
In November 2004, Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC entered into a thirty-year public trust tidelands lease agreement with the State of Mississippi for certain marsh lands. Prior to Hurricane Katrina, all Gulf Coast casinos had similar tidelands leases with the State of Mississippi, generally for the lease of water bottoms under each casino when the casinos were required to be floating. Subsequent to Hurricane Katrina, the law changed to allow casinos to be built on land no further than 800 feet from the approved gaming site. Therefore, the tidelands lease expired and the Gulf Coast casinos hold “In Lieu” agreements with the State of Mississippi. The “In Lieu” agreements are in the form of a property tax assessment with the State of Mississippi, and the properties are taxed similarly to their tidelands leases as long as they occupy the land and continue gaming operations.  Payments under our “In Lieu” agreement are currently approximately $473,000 per year and are subject to annual reviewvarious reporting and adjustment including consumer price index factors.

Colorado Regulatory Matters

On February 18, 2016, the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission approved us for the necessary licenses required for our pending acquisition of Bronco Billy's. We expect to complete our refinancinganti-money laundering regulations. Such laws and close on the pending acquisitionregulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the second quarter of 2016, subject to obtaining the remaining required regulatory approvalsfuture, or new laws and other customary closing conditions. Assuming the transaction closes as expected,regulations could be enacted. Material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences in future years we will provide a summary of relevant Colorado regulatory matters.

interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our operating results. See Item 1A - “Risk Factors” for additional discussion.
Costs and Effects of Compliance with Environmental Laws
 
Indiana riverboat casinosWe are subject to regulation byvarious federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern our operations, including emissions and discharges into the environment, and the handling and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous substances and wastes. For example, our Indiana property is subject to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (“IDEM”). That department has regulations similar to the federal Department of Environmental Protection and maintains enforcement programs in the areas of air pollution, water and wastewater pollution and hazardous waste handling. Operating afor its riverboat and a golf club weoperations, and our Mississippi property is located near environmental wetlands and discharges wastewater. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could result in costs for corrective action, penalties or the imposition of other liabilities or restrictions. We also are subject to laws and regulations that impose liability and clean-up responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the regulationenvironment. Under certain of these laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of the IDEM inproperty may be liable for the costs of remediating contaminated soil or groundwater on or from its property, without regard to whether the owners or operator knew of, or caused, the contamination, as well as incur liability to third parties impacted by such contamination. The presence of contamination, or failure to remediate it properly, may adversely affect our operations. The IDEMability to use, sell or rent the property. To date, none of these matters or other matters arising under environmental laws has reporting requirements and can impose fines and other penalties for violationshad a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of its regulations. Whileoperations; however, there can be criminal sanctions for serious and intentional violations ofno assurance that such matters will not have such an effect in the regulations, the general penalty is a fine of up to $30,000 for each day of a violation and injunctions against continued violations and corrective orders. Rising Star Casino Resort has not been the subject of any fine or other enforcement proceeding by the IDEM.future.
 
Competition
 
The gaming industry is highly competitive. Gaming activities include traditional land-basedcommercial casinos and casino resorts in various states including on tribal lands and at racetracks, riverboat and dockside gaming, casino gaming on tribal land, state-sponsored lotteries, video poker in restaurants, bars and hotels, pari-mutuel betting on horse racing,and dog racing and jai alai, sports bookmaking,betting and card rooms, and casinos at racetracks.rooms.  Furthermore, competition from internet lotteries, sweepstakes, and other internet wagering gaming services, which allow their customers to wager on a wide variety of sporting events and play Las Vegas-style casino games from home or in non-casino settings, could divert customers from our properties and thus adversely affect our business. Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel, Rising Star Casino Resort, Stockman’s Casino and Grand Lodge Casino,All of our casinos, as well as other casinos that we may develop or acquire, compete with all these forms of gaming.  We also will compete with any new forms or jurisdictions of gaming that may be legalized, as well as with other types of entertainment. Some of our competitors have more personnel and


greater financial or other resources than we do. The principal methods of competition are: location, with casinos located closer to their feeder markets at an advantage; casino, lodging, entertainment and other hospitality product quality both in terms of the qualityfacilities, customer service and ease of the facilities and customer service;access; breadth of offerings, including the selectiontypes of casino games and other non-gaming amenities (such as a hotel) offered at the facility;amenities; and marketing, oftenincluding the amount and frequency of promotions offered to guests.

16




     
Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel
 
Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel is the western-most casino on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. ItCoast and competes with several larger casinos located nearby in Hancock County, Mississippi, casinos in Gulfport and Biloxi, Mississippi and with casinos in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Gulfport and Biloxi are 45 minutes and one hour east, respectively, of the Silver Slipper along Interstate 10. New Orleans and Baton Rouge are one and two hours, respectively, west of Silver Slipper.

Silver Slipper is the closest casino to most of St. Tammany Parish, one of the most affluent and fast-growingfastest-growing parishes in Louisiana. Louisiana law permits fifteen15 riverboat casinos, one land-based casino, four casinos at racetracks, and in certain areas, a limited number of slot machines at qualifying truck stops. The legislation permitting riverboat and truck stop casinos requires a local referendum and, at the time such legislation occurred, the legalization was rejected by St. Tammany Parish voters. At this time, all licenses for riverboat casinos in Louisiana have been granted and are in operation. Mississippi, which has lower gaming tax rates than Louisiana, does not have a limitation on the number of casino licenses, but requires casinos in certain southern counties to be within 800 feet of the shoreline.shoreline, as defined by state law.

Silver Slipper competes with larger casinosBronco Billy's Casino and Hotel

Bronco Billy's is located nearby in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. It also competes withCripple Creek, Colorado, which is a former gold mining town located approximately one hour southwest of Colorado Springs near the base of Pikes Peak. Cripple Creek is now considered a gambling and tourist destination and is one of only three cities in Colorado where commercial gaming is permitted. The other two cities are near Denver. Additionally, two Native American gaming operations exist in southwestern Colorado and there are tribal casinos in Gulfport and Biloxi, Mississippi and with casinosOklahoma, but these are much further from Colorado Springs than Cripple Creek. As of December 31, 2016, there were eight other gaming facilities operating in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Gulfport and Biloxi are 45 minutes and one hour east, respectively,Cripple Creek. Gaming in Colorado is “limited stakes,” which restricts any single wager to a current maximum of the Silver Slipper along Interstate 10. New Orleans and Baton Rouge are one and two hours, respectively, west of Silver Slipper.$100.

Rising Star Casino Resort
 
The Rising Star Casino Resort in Rising Sun, Indiana is one of three riverboat casinos located on the Ohio River in southeastern Indiana, approximately one hour from Cincinnati, Ohio and within two hours of Indianapolis, Indiana and Louisville and Lexington, Kentucky. Its closest competitors are each approximately 15 miles away, near bridges crossing the Ohio River. Rising Star also competes with casinos in Ohio, including Belterra Park, which opened in downtown Cincinnati in 2014,Ohio; a casino-resort in French Lick, Indiana,Indiana; and two racetrack casinos near Indianapolis, Indiana.

A Kentucky Supreme Court decision in 2014 may permit a horse racing track in northern Kentucky to install slot machine-like devices.devices, although it has not yet done so. The Indiana legislature also passed legislation in 2015 to allow table games at racetracks (which are now limited to slot machines) beginning in 2020. We recently acquired land in Kentucky and are seeking permission to operate a car ferry service so customers residing in Kentucky do not have to travel additional distance and pass other casinos en route to Rising Star.2021.
 
Northern Nevada

Stockman’s Casino
 
We believe Stockman’s Casino is located in Fallon, Nevada on Highway 50, approximately 60 miles east of Reno, Nevada, and is the largest of several casinos in Churchill County.  The county’sCounty, which has a population isof approximately 25,000. A nearby source of additional customers is Naval Air Station Fallon, the United States Navy's premier air-to-air and air-to-ground training facility and home of the "Top Gun" school. While we are not aware of any significant planned expansion to gaming capacity in the Churchill County area, additional competition may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, ifwhile the naval airNavy seems to be currently expanding its base closed,in Fallon, were it to reduce its activities at the base, it would likely have an adverse effect on our financial condition andStockman's results of operations. However, the base is currently in the midst of a significant expansion.
 
Grand Lodge Casino
 
Grand Lodge Casino is one of four casinos located within a five-mile radius in the North Lake Tahoe area.   A fifth casino, is scheduled to re-open duringin 2016 although suchafter a refurbishment, has not yet re-opened. Its opening date has been postponed several times.times and the project entered bankruptcy proceedings in 2016. 
 


Grand Lodge Casino also competes with casinos in nearby South Lake Tahoe and Reno.  There are also numerous Native American casinos in California serving the Northern California market.

Marketing
 
Our marketing efforts are conducted through various means, including our customer loyalty programs and specialized marketing campaigns, such as our seasonal "Christmas Casino" event at the Rising Star Casino Resort. We advertise through various channels, including radio, television, internet, billboards, newspapers and magazines, direct mail, email and social media.  We also maintain websites to inform customers about our properties and utilize social media sites to promote our brands, unique events, and special deals.  Our customer loyalty programs include the Silver Slipper Casino Players Club, Bronco Billy’s MVP “Most Valuable Players” Club, the Rising Star Rewards Club™, the Grand Lodge Players Advantage Club® and the Stockman’s Winner’s Club.  Under these programs, customers earn points based on their volume of wagering that may be redeemed for various benefits, such as free play, cash back, complimentary dining, or hotel stays.


17



Our properties do not have coordinated loyalty programs. We do not currently believe that it would be economically advantageous given the disparate locations of our properties. Instead, our loyalty programs focus on providing each casino's customers the amenities they most prefer.

Employees
 
As of March 25, 2016,14, 2017, we had fourteen13 full-time corporate employees, three of whom are executive officers and two additional senior management employees. Our casino properties had 1,0471,319 full-time and 295360 part-time employees as follows:
 
 Full-time Part-time Full-time Part-time
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel 441
 93
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel 455
 95
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel 253
 56
Rising Star Casino Resort 421
 147
 431
 161
Grand Lodge Casino 99
 45
 97
 44
Stockman’s Casino 86
 10
 83
 4
 
We believe that our relationship with our employees is excellent. None of our employees nor those of our principal competitors, are currently represented by labor unions.

18





Item 1A. Risk Factors.
 
An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent to our business. We have described below what we currently believe to be the material risks and uncertainties in our business. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
We also face other risks and uncertainties beyond what is described below. This Annual Report on Form 10-K is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of securities, including our common stock, could decline significantly. You could lose all or part of your investment.

Our present indebtedness, projected future borrowings, possible fluctuating interest rates, and required repayment schedule, and redeemable common stock warrants could adversely affect our financial health; future cash flows may not be sufficient to satisfy our obligations when due, anddue; and/or we may have difficulty obtaining additional financing or refinancing.
refinancing in the future.
As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had gross indebtedness of $68$98.3 million, including $48$43.3 million of variable interest first lien debt and $20$55 million of second lien debt. Interest rates on the second lien debt with an interest rate that can range from 13.25%12.5% to 15.25%13.5%. Our first lien debt matures in April 2017,May 2019, and includes monthly interest payments plus quarterly principal payments of $1.5 million.$562,500 until May 13, 2018 and $843,750 through its maturity in May 2019. Our second lien debt also matures in April 2017upon the earlier of May 2022 or six months following the maturity of our first lien debt, and includes monthly interest payments.payments with the principal due in its entirety at maturity.
Additionally, in connection with the refinanced second lien debt, we granted warrants to the second lien lenders representing 5% of the outstanding common equity of the Company, as determined on a fully-diluted basis. Among other items, the warrants provide the second lien lenders with registration rights and certain redemption rights. The redemption rights allow the second lien lenders, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of all of the warrants under certain conditions.
There can be no assurance that, in the future, we will be successful in refinancing our debt or that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or through asset sales to meet our long-term debt service obligations. Our present indebtedness and projected future borrowings could have important adverse consequences to us, such as:
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our existing indebtedness;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing without restructuring the covenants in our existing indebtedness to permit the incurrence of such financing;
requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow to be used for payments on the debt and related interest, thereby reducing our ability to use cash flow to fund other working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate requirements;
limiting our ability to respond to changing business, industry and economic conditions and to withstand competitive pressures, which may affect our financial condition;
causing us to incur higher interest expense, either in the event of increases in interest rates on our borrowings that have variable interest rates, or in the event of refinancing existing debt at higher interest rates;
limiting our ability to make investments, dispose of assets, pay cash dividends or repurchase stock;
increasing our vulnerability to downturns in our business, our industry or the general economy and restricting us from making improvements or acquisitions or exploring business opportunities;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors with less debt or greater resources; and
subjecting us to financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness, the non-compliance with which could result in an event of default.
If we fail to refinance our debt or extend our current loan maturities at least one year prior to their maturities, it becomes a current liability.  Having a large current liability may cause our auditors to express substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a “going concern”.
There can be no assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that our anticipated growth in operations will be realized, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our credit facilities in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness to complete our pending acquisition of Bronco Billy's, or to fund our other liquidity needs. In addition, as we undertake substantial new developments or facility renovations or if we consummate significant acquisitions in the future, our cash requirements and our debt service requirements may increase significantly.
We may need or opt to refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity. There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance any of our debt on either attractive terms or commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Our future operating performance and our ability to service, extend or refinance our indebtedness will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.


19



Certain borrowings under our credit facilities are at variable rates of interest, and to the extent not protected with interest rate hedges, could expose us to market risk from adverse changes in interest rates. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable-rate indebtedness could increase significantly even though the amount borrowed would remain the same.

The pending acquisition of Bronco Billy's remains subject to closing risks and integration risks should it be completed.

The pending acquisition pursuant to which the Company will acquire Bronco Billy's may not be completed for a variety of reasons, and could result in the loss of our $2.5 million purchase deposit. Such reasons include, but are not limited to: the ability to refinance our debt or raise additional funds with terms that are commercially reasonable; conditions to the closing of the transaction may not be satisfied; the occurrence of an event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the agreement; other risks to the consummation of the transaction, including the risk that the transaction will not receive necessary approvals from the remaining gaming regulatory authorities either within the permitted time period or at all; and the transaction may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays.

If we do consummate the transaction, we will face certain challenges as we integrate Bronco Billy’s operational and administrative systems into our business. As a result, the realization of anticipated benefits may be delayed or substantially reduced. Events outside of our control, including changes in state and federal regulations and laws as well as economic trends, also could adversely affect our ability to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition.
Our indebtedness imposes restrictive covenants on us.
     
Our credit facilities impose various customary covenants on us and our subsidiaries. The restrictions that are imposed under these debt obligations include, among other obligations, limitations on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to:
incur additional debt;
make payments on subordinated obligations;
make dividends or distributions and repurchase stock;
make investments;
grant liens on our property to secure debt;
sell assets or enter into mergers or consolidations;
sell equity interest in our subsidiaries;
make capital expenditures;
amend or modify our subordinate indebtedness without obtaining consent from the holders of our senior indebtedness.
Our credit facilities impose various customary affirmative covenants on us and our restricted subsidiaries, including, among others, reporting covenants, covenants to maintain insurance, compliance with laws, maintenance of properties and other covenants customary in financings of this type. In addition, our credit facilities require that we comply with various restrictive maintenance financial covenants, including a maximum total leverage ratio and maximum first lien leverage ratio (a ratio of debt to LTM Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in our credit facilities), and a fixed chargefixed-charge coverage ratio.
Our ability to comply with the covenants governing our indebtedness may be affected by general economic conditions, industry conditions, and other events beyond our control, including delay in the completion of new projects under construction. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with these covenants. Our failure to comply with the covenants contained in the instruments governing our indebtedness, including failure to comply as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and our financial condition.
 
If there were an event of default under one of our credit facilities and it is not waived (at their option) by the requisite lenders, the holders of the defaulted debt could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to that debt to be due and payable, subject to applicable grace periods. This could trigger cross-defaults under our other debt obligations. There can be no assurance that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient to repay borrowings under our outstanding credit facilities if accelerated upon an event of default, or that we would be able to repay, refinance or restructure the payments on any of those debt instruments.


20



To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.
 
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, and to fund planned capital expenditures and expansion efforts, will depend upon our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.
 
There can be no assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our credit facilities in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness as such indebtedness matures, and to fund our other liquidity needs. In such circumstances, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness at or before maturity, and cannot provide assurances that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. We may have to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying planned expenses and capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring debt, or obtaining additional equity or debt financing or joint venture partners. These financing strategies may not be completed on satisfactory terms, if at all. In addition, certain states’ laws to undertake certain financing transactions require approval of gaming regulatory authorities. Some requirements may prevent or delay us from obtaining necessary capital.


Our ability to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms may be limited.
 
Although we believe that our cash, cash equivalents and working capital, as well as future cash from operations and availability under the revolving term loan, will provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating requirements over the next 12 months, we may need to refinance or seek additional financing to compete effectively.effectively or grow our business. Management is reviewing market conditions and exploring financing or refinancing alternatives. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain any additional financing or to refinance our existing debt, or to fund our growth efforts. If we are unable to obtain financing on commercially reasonable terms, it could:

reduce funds available to us for purposes such as working capital, capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
restrict our ability to capitalize on business opportunities;
increase our vulnerability to economic downturns and competitive pressures in the markets in which we operate; and
place us at a competitive disadvantage.
 
The exercise of outstanding warrants and options may result in substantial dilution and may depress the trading price of our common stock.
If our outstanding warrants and options to purchase shares of our common stock are exercised and the underlying shares of common stock are issued upon such exercise are sold, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution and the market price of our shares of common stock could decline. Further, the perception that such securities might be exercised could adversely affect the trading price of our shares of common stock. In addition, during the time that such securities are outstanding, they may adversely affect the terms on which we could obtain additional capital.
We may face disruption and other difficulties in integrating and managing facilities we have recently developed or acquired, or may develop or acquire in the future.
     During 2016, we acquired Bronco Billy's. We may face certain challenges as we integrate these operational and administrative systems into our business. As a result, the realization of anticipated benefits may be delayed or substantially reduced. Events outside of our control, including changes in state and federal regulations and laws as well as economic trends, also could adversely affect our ability to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition or future development.

We expect to continue pursuing expansion opportunities. We regularly evaluate opportunities for acquisition and development of new properties, which evaluations may include discussions and the review of confidential information after the execution of nondisclosure agreements with potential acquisition candidates, some of which may be potentially significant in relation to our size. We could face significant challenges in managing and integrating our expanded or combined operations and any other properties we may develop or acquire, particularly in new competitive markets. The integration of properties we may develop or acquire will require the dedication of management resources that may temporarily divert attention from our day-to-day business. The process of integrating properties that we may acquire also could interrupt the activities of those businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the development of new properties may involve construction, local opposition, regulatory, legal and competitive risks, as well as the risks attendant to partnership deals on these development opportunities. In particular, in projects where we team up with a joint venture partner, if we cannot reach agreement with such partners, or our relationships otherwise deteriorate, we could face significant increased costs and delays. Local opposition can delay or increase the anticipated cost of a project. Finally, given the competitive nature of these types of limited license opportunities, litigation is possible.
Management of new properties, especially in new geographic areas, may require that we increase our management resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to manage the combined operations effectively or realize any of the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions. We also cannot assure you that if acquisitions are completed, that the acquired businesses will generate returns consistent with our expectations.
Our ability to achieve our objectives in connection with any acquisition we may consummate may be highly dependent on, among other things, our ability to retain the senior-level property management teams of such acquisition candidates. If, for any reason, we are unable to retain these management teams following such acquisitions or if we fail to attract new capable executives, our operations after consummation of such acquisitions could be materially adversely affected.


If we make new acquisitions or new investments, we may face additional risks related to our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, ability to satisfy financial covenants and comply with other restrictive covenants under our debt agreements, and ability to pay or refinance our credit facilities and other indebtedness.
The occurrence of some or all of the above described events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may face reductions in discretionary consumer spending as a result of an economic downturn.
     
Our net revenues are highly dependent upon the volume and spending levels of customers at our properties and, as such, our business has been adversely impacted by economic downturns. Decreases in discretionary consumer spending brought about by weakened general economic conditions such as, but not limited to, lackluster recoveries from recessions, high unemployment levels, higher income taxes, low levels of consumer confidence, weakness in the housing market, cultural and demographic changes, and increased stock market volatility may negatively impact our revenues and operating cash flow.
 
We face significant competition from other gaming and entertainment operations.
 
The gaming industry is characterized by an increasingly high degree of competition among a large number of participants, including riverboat casinos, dockside casinos, land-based casinos, racetrack casinos, video lottery, poker machines not located in casinos, Native American gaming, social gaming and other forms of gaming. Furthermore, competition from internet lotteries, sweepstakes, and other internet wagering gaming services, which allow their customers to wager on a wide variety of sporting events and play Las Vegas-style casino games from home or in non-casino settings, could divert customers from our properties and thus adversely affect our business. Such internet wagering services are often illegal under federal law but operate from overseas locations and are nevertheless sometimes accessible to domestic gamblers. Currently, there are proposals that would legalize internet poker and other varieties of internet gaming in a number of states and at the federal level. Several states, including Nevada, New Jersey, and Delaware, have enacted legislation authorizing intrastate internet gaming and internet gaming operations have begun in these states. Expansion of internet gaming in other jurisdictions (both legal and illegal) could further compete with our traditional operations, which could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
 
In a broader sense, our gaming operations face competition from all manner of leisure and entertainment activities, including shopping, athletic events, television and movies, concerts, and travel. Legalized gaming is currently permitted in various forms throughout the U.S., in several Canadian provinces and on various lands taken into trust for the benefit of certain Native Americans in the U.S. and Canada. Other jurisdictions that border our operational locations, such as Ohio, have recently legalized and implemented gaming. In addition, established gaming jurisdictions could award additional gaming licenses or permit the expansion or relocation of existing gaming operations. New, relocated or expanded operations by other persons could increase

21



competition for our gaming operations and could have a material adverse impact on us. Gaming competition is intense in most of the markets where we operate. As competing properties and new markets are opened, our operating results may be negatively impacted. In addition, some of our direct competitors in certain markets may have superior facilities and/or operating conditions.  We expect each existing or future market in which we participate to be highly competitive. The competitive position of each of our casino properties is discussed in “Item 1. Business – Competition”.
 
We face extensive regulation from gaming and other regulatory authorities.
 
Licensing.    The ownership, management and operation of gaming facilities are subject to extensive state and local regulation.   See “Item 1. Business – Government Regulation.”
 
Taxation and fees.    We believe that the prospect of significant revenue is one of the primary reasons that jurisdictions permit legalized gaming. As a result, gaming companies are typically subject to significant revenue-based taxes and fees in addition to normal federal, state, local and provincial income and employment taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. We pay substantial taxes and fees with respect to our operations. From time to time, federal, state, local and provincial legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax laws, or in the administration of such laws, affecting the gaming industry. In addition, worsening economic conditions could intensify the efforts of state and local governments to raise revenues through increases in gaming taxes and/or property taxes. It is not possible to determine with certainty the likelihood of changes in tax laws or in the administration of such laws. Such changes, if adopted, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The large number of state and local governments with significant current or projected budget deficits makes it more likely that those governments that currently permit gaming will seek to fund such deficits with new or increased gaming taxes and/or property taxes, and worsening economic conditions could intensify those efforts. Any material increase, or the adoption of additional taxes or fees, could have a material adverse effect on our futurebusiness, financial results.condition and results of operations.
 
Compliance with other laws.    We are also subject to a variety of other rules and regulations, including zoning, environmental, employment, construction and land-use laws, and regulations governing the serving of alcoholic beverages. If we


are not in compliance with these laws, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are a significant employer.

While the vast majority of our employees earn more than the minimum wage in the relative jurisdictions, increases in the minimum wage could have an impact on our expenses and results of operations. We also provide medical plan benefits for a majority of our employees and many of their families. The cost of providing such benefits has risen significantly more than inflation in recent years and is encumbered by numerous regulations.

We are subject to certain federal, state and other regulations.
 
We are subject to certain federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to businesses generally. The Bank Secrecy Act, enforced by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) of the U.S. Treasury Department, requires us to report currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the guest by name and social security number, to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).  This regulation also requires us to report certain suspicious activity, including any transaction that exceeds $5,000 that we know, suspect or have reason to believe involves funds from illegal activity or is designed to evade federal regulations or reporting requirements.  Periodic audits by the IRS and our internal audit department assess compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act, and substantial penalties can be imposed against us if we fail to comply with this regulation.  In recent years, the U.S. Treasury Department has increased its focus on Bank Secrecy Act compliance throughout the gaming industry. Recent public comments by FinCEN suggest that casinos should obtain information on each customer’s sources of income.  This could impact our ability to attract and retain casino guests.
 
Our riverboat at Rising Star must comply with certain federal and state laws and regulations with respect to boat design, on-board facilities, equipment, personnel and safety. In addition, we are required to have third parties periodically inspect and certify our casino riverboat for safety, stability and single compartment flooding integrity. All of our casinos also must meet local fire safety standards. We would incur additional costs, if any, if our gaming facilities were not in compliance with one or more of these regulations.
 
We are also subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations affecting businesses in general. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, smoking, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising.
 
We also deal with significant amounts of cash in our operations and are subject to various reporting and anti-money laundering regulations. Any violations of anti-money laundering laws or regulations by any of our properties could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Such laws and regulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted.
 
The imposition of a substantial penalty could have a material adverse effect on our business.
 

22



Our business may be adversely affected by legislation prohibiting tobacco smoking.
 
Legislation in various forms to ban indoor tobacco smoking has been enacted or introduced in jurisdictions in which we operate.  The gaming areas of our properties are not currently subject to tobacco restrictions.  While gaming areas have generally been exempted from these restrictions, if additional restrictions on smoking are enacted in jurisdictions in which we operate, we could experience a significant decrease in gaming revenue and particularly, if such restrictions are not applicable to all competitive facilities in that gaming market, our business could be materially adversely affected.
 
We derive a significant amount of our revenues and operating income from our properties located in Mississippi, Colorado, Indiana and Nevada, and are especially subject to certain risks, including economic and competitive risks, associated with the conditions in those areas and in the states from which we draw patrons.
Because we derive a significant amount of revenues and operating income from properties concentrated in threefour states, we are subject to greater risks from regional conditions than a gaming company with operating properties in severala greater number of different geographies. A decrease in revenues from or increase in costs for one of these locations is likely to have a proportionally greater impact on our business and operations than it would for a gaming company with more geographically diverse operating properties. Risks from regional conditions include the following:
regional economic conditions;


regional competitive conditions, including legalization or expansion of gaming in Mississippi, Colorado, Indiana, Nevada, or in neighboring states;
allowance of new types of gaming, such as the introduction of live table games at Indiana racinos;
reduced land and air travel due to increasing fuel costs or transportation disruptions; and,
increase in our vulnerability to economic downturns and competitive pressures in the markets in which we operate.

Some of our casinos are located on leased property. If lessor buyout rights are exercised or if we default on one or more leases, the applicable lessors could terminate the affected leases and we could lose possession of the affected casino.
We lease certain parcels of land at our Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel in Mississippi, both land and buildings at Bronco Billy’s Hotel and Casino in Colorado, and one of the two hotels at our Rising Star Casino Resort in Indiana. We also lease casino space at our Grand Lodge Casino in Nevada. As a lessee, we have the right to use the leased land, hotel or space as applicable; however, we do not hold fee ownership. Accordingly, unless we have a purchase option and exercise such option, we will have no interest in the improvements thereon at the expiration of the leases. We have such purchase options on the leased property at the Silver Slipper, Bronco Billy’s and for the leased hotel at Rising Star, but it is generally more advantageous to the Company to continue to lease rather than exercise the buyout option. Under certain circumstances and at the expirations of the underlying leases, the Company might be forced to exercise its buyout options in order to continue to operate those properties. There is no certainty that the funds could be raised at that time at a reasonable cost, or at all, to exercise some or all of the buyout options. The operating lease at the Grand Lodge Casino includes certain lessor buyout rights based upon a multiple of EBITDA that, if exercised, could result in the lessor purchasing our leasehold interest and the operating assets on terms that are less than fair market value or that are financially unfavorable to us. Sincewe do not completely control the land, buildings, hotel and space underlying our leased properties, a lessor could take certain actions to disrupt our rights under the long-term leases which are beyond our control. If the entity owning any leased land, buildings, hotel or space chose to disrupt our use either permanently or for a significant period of time, then the value of our assets could be impaired and our business and operations could be adversely affected. If we were to default on the lease, the lessor could terminate the affected lease and we could lose possession of the affected land, buildings, hotel or space and any improvements thereon. The loss of the lease through exercise of buyout rights or through termination upon default would have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations as we would then be unable to operate all or portions of the affected facilities, which, in turn, may result in a default under our credit facilities.
We are engaged from time to time in one or more construction and development projects, and many factors could prevent us from completing them as planned.
 
Construction of major buildings has certain inherent risks, including the risks of fire, structural collapse, human error and electrical, mechanical and plumbing malfunction. In addition, projects entail additional risks related to structural heights and the required use of cranes. Our development and expansion projects also entail significant risks, including:
 
shortage of materials;
shortage of skilled labor or work stoppages;
unforeseen construction scheduling, engineering, excavation, environmental or geological problems;
natural disasters, hurricanes, weather interference, changes in river levels, floods, fires, earthquakes or other casualty losses or delays;
unanticipated cost increase or delays in completing the project;

23



delays in obtaining or inability to obtain or maintain necessary license or permits;
changes to plans or specifications;
performance by contractors and subcontractors;
disputes with contractors;
disruption of our operations caused by diversion of management’s attention to new development projects and construction at our existing properties;
remediation of environmental contamination at some of our proposed construction sites, which may prove more difficult or expensive than anticipated in our construction budgets;
failure to obtain and maintain necessary gaming regulatory approvals and licenses, or failure to obtain such approvals and licenses on a timely basis;
requirements or government-established “goals” concerning union labor or requiring that a portion of the project expenditures be through companies controlled by specific ethnic or gender groups, goals that may not be obtainable, or may only be obtainable at additional project cost; and


increases in the cost of raw materials for construction, driven by demand, higher labor and construction costs and other factors, may cause price increases beyond those anticipated in the budgets for our development projects.
  
Escalating construction costs may cause us to modify the design and scope of projects from those initially contemplated or cause the budgets for those projects to be increased. We generally carry insurance to cover certain liabilities related to construction, but not all risks are covered, and it is uncertain whether such insurance will provide sufficient payment in a timely fashion even for those risks that are insured and material to us.
 
Construction of our development projects exposes us to risks of cost overruns due to typical construction uncertainties associated with any project or changes in the designs, plans or concepts of such projects. For these and other reasons, construction costs may exceed the estimated cost of completion, notwithstanding the existence of any guaranteed maximum price construction contracts.

We face a number of challenges prior to opening new or upgraded facilities.
We have several development and improvement projects planned in the near future. No assurance can provide no assurancebe given that, when we endeavor to open new or upgraded facilities, the expected timetables for opening such facilities will be met in light of the uncertainties inherent in the development of the regulatory framework, construction, the licensing process, legislative action and litigation. Delays in opening new or upgraded facilities could lead to increased costs and delays in receiving anticipated revenues with respect to such facilities and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Subsequent phases to certain of our existing projects and potential enhancements at our properties may require us to raise additional capital.
We may need to access the capital markets or otherwise obtain additional funds to complete subsequent phases of our existing projects and to fund potential enhancements we may undertake at our facilities there. We do not know when or if the capital markets will permit us to raise additional funds for such phases and enhancements in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, or at all. Inability to access the capital markets, or the availability of capital only on less-than-favorable terms, may force us to delay, reduce or cancel our subsequent phases and enhancement projects.
Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets for future offerings may also be limited by our financial condition, results of operations or other factors, such as our credit rating or outlook at the time of any such financing or offering and the covenants in our existing debt agreements, as well as by general economic conditions and contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. As we seek additional financing, we will be successful in the "request for proposal" process, which is a competitive bidding process that involves unique risks.

On August 10, 2015, we responded to a "Request for Proposal" (RFP) by the Indianapolis Airport Authority with a proposal for a $650 million lifestyle complex, anchored by a modest-size casino, known as "American Place". The RFP process typically involves intense competition and presents a number of risks that may not typically be present, including the need to devote substantial time and attention of management and key employeessubject to the preparationrisks of a proposal that may not be accepted. In addition,rising interest rates and other factors affecting the RFP may attract competitors with more experience in developing large commercial projects or that are better capitalized or possess other advantages that may be compelling to the Indianapolis Airport Authority. The Indianapolis Airport Authority invited oral presentations from the different applicants in September 2015. The Indianapolis Airport Authority may select a proposal other than the proposal submitted by us or no proposal at all. We are aware of at least one other proposal which includes a sports medical complex and a 20,000-seat sports stadium. In March 2016, the Airport Authority indicated that it was canceling the RFP process, but intends to continue to seek development of the site in a manner that would be beneficial to Indianapolis and the state of Indiana. Even if selected, we may not be able to obtain the financing, partners or regulatory and legislative approvals necessary for this proposed project. There can be no assurances regarding our business prospects with respect to this opportunity. There is no certainty that our proposal will be selected or that the proposed project will become a reality.financial markets.

The casino, hotel and resort industry is capital intensive and we may not be able to finance expansion and renovation projects, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage.
 
Our properties have an ongoing need for renovations and other capital improvements to remain competitive, including replacement, from time to time, of furniture, fixtures and equipment.  We may also need to make capital expenditures at our casino properties to comply with our debt covenants, lease agreements and applicable laws and regulations.
 
Renovations and other capital improvements at our properties require significant capital expenditures. In addition, renovations and capital improvements usually generate little or no cash flow until the projects are completed.  We may not be able to fund such projects solely from existing resources and cash provided from operating activities.  Consequently, we may have to rely upon the availability of debt or equity capital to fund renovations and capital improvements, and our ability to carry them out will be limited if we cannot obtain satisfactory debt or equity financing, which will depend on, among other things, market conditions.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional equity or debt financing or that we will be able to obtain such financing on favorable terms. Our failure to renovate our properties may put us at a competitive disadvantage.

24



 
Adverse weather conditions, road construction, gasoline shortages and other factors affecting our facilities and the areas in which we operate could make it more difficult for potential customers to travel to our properties and deter customers from visiting our properties.
Our continued success depends upon our ability to draw customers from each of the geographic markets in which we operate. Adverse weather conditions or road construction can deter our customers from traveling to our facilities or make it difficult for them to frequent our properties. In 2014, there were severe cold temperatures that we believe adversely affected our Indiana


and Mississippi properties’ financial performance. Additionally, we believe historically low snow levels in early 2015 in the Lake Tahoe region adversely affected visitation and financial performance at the Grand Lodge Casino. Bronco Billy's was adversely affected by nearby fires, as well as the subsequent flooding of its access roads in 2012 and 2013, and road construction in 2014. Moreover, gasoline shortages or fuel price increases in regions that constitute a significant source of customers for our properties could make it more difficult for potential customers to travel to our properties and deter customers from visiting. Our dockside gaming facility in Indiana, as well as any additional riverboat or dockside casino properties that might be developed or acquired, are also subject to risks, in addition to those associated with land-based casinos, which could disrupt our operations. Although our Indiana vessel does not leave its moorings in normal operations, there are risks associated with the movement or mooring of vessels on waterways, including risks of casualty due to river turbulence, flooding, collisions with other vessels and severe weather conditions.
Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by the occurrence of natural disasters, such as hurricanes, or other catastrophic events, including war and terrorism.
 
Natural disasters, such as major hurricanes, tornados, typhoons, floods, fires and earthquakes, could adversely affect our business and operating results. Hurricanes are common in the areas in which our Mississippi property is located and the severity of such natural disasters is unpredictable. In 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused significant damage in the Gulf Coast region and damaged a casino that previously existed at our Mississippi site.  Additionally, our Indiana property is at risk of flooding due to its proximity to the Ohio River.
 
Catastrophic events, such as terrorist and war activities in the United States and elsewhere, have had a negative effect on travel and leisure expenditures, including lodging, gaming and tourism. We cannot accurately predict the extent to which such events may affect us, directly or indirectly, in the future. There also can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or choose to purchase any insurance coverage with respect to occurrences of terrorist acts and any losses that could result from these acts. If there is a prolonged disruption at our properties due to natural disasters, terrorist attacks or other catastrophic events, our results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

Several of our properties, including Silver Slipper, Bronco Billy’s and, to a lesser extent, Rising Star, are accessed by our customers via routes that have few alternatives.
The Silver Slipper is located at the end of a dead-end road, with no other access. Bronco Billy’s is accessed by most guests via a mountain pass; if that pass is closed for any reason, the alternatives take much longer. Rising Star’s primary access from Cincinnati is via a road alongside the Ohio River; if this road were to close, the alternative routes involve more winding roads through the rolling hills inland from the river. If access to any of these roads is blocked for any significant period, our results of operations and financial condition would be materially affected.
We may incur property and other losses that are not adequately covered by insurance, including adequate levels of Weather Catastrophe Occurrence/Named Windstorm, Flood and Earthquake insurance coverage for our properties.
 
Although we maintain insurance that our management believes is customary and appropriate for our business, there can be no assurance that insurance will be available at reasonable costs in any given year or adequate to cover all losses and damage to which our business or our assets might be subjected. The lack of adequate insurance for certain types or levels of risk could expose us to significant losses in the event that a catastrophe occurred for which we are uninsured or under-insured. Any losses we incur that are not adequately covered by insurance may decrease our future operating income, require us to find replacements or repairs for destroyed property, and reduce the funds available for payments of our obligations.
 
Because of significant loss experience caused by hurricanes and other natural disasters over the last several years, a number of insurance companies have stopped writing insurance in Class 1 hurricane areas, including Mississippi. Others have significantly limited the amount of coverage they will write in these markets and increased the premiums charged for this coverage. In addition, as a result of the worldwide economic conditions, there has beenAdditionally, uncertainty can occur as to the viability of certain insurance companies. While we believe that the insurance companies from which we have purchased insurance policies will remain solvent, there is no certainty that this will be the case.

We may face disruption and other difficulties in integrating and managing facilities we have recently developed or acquired, or may develop or acquire in the future.
We expect to continue pursuing expansion opportunities, and we regularly evaluate opportunities for acquisition and development of new properties, which evaluations may include discussions and the review of confidential information after the execution of nondisclosure agreements with potential acquisition candidates, some of which may be potentially significant in relation to our size.

25



We could face significant challenges in managing and integrating our expanded or combined operations and any other properties we may develop or acquire, particularly in new competitive markets. The integration of properties we may develop or acquire will require the dedication of management resources that may temporarily divert attention from our day-to-day business. The process of integrating properties that we may acquire also could interrupt the activities of those businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the development of new properties may involve construction, local opposition, regulatory, legal and competitive risks, as well as the risks attendant to partnership deals on these development opportunities. In particular, in projects where we team up with a joint venture partner, if we cannot reach agreement with such partners, or our relationships otherwise deteriorate, we could face significant increased costs and delays. Local opposition can delay or increase the anticipated cost of a project. Finally, given the competitive nature of these types of limited license opportunities, litigation is possible.
Management of new properties, especially in new geographic areas, may require that we increase our management resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to manage the combined operations effectively or realize any of the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions. We also cannot assure you that if acquisitions are completed, that the acquired businesses will generate returns consistent with our expectations.
Our ability to achieve our objectives in connection with any acquisition we may consummate may be highly dependent on, among other things, our ability to retain the senior level property management teams of such acquisition candidates. If, for any reason, we are unable to retain these management teams following such acquisitions or if we fail to attract new capable executives, our operations after consummation of such acquisitions could be materially adversely affected.
If we make new acquisitions or new investments, we may face additional risks related to our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, ability to satisfy financial covenants and comply with other restrictive covenants under our debt agreements, and ability to pay or refinance our credit facilities and other indebtedness.
The occurrence of some or all of the above described events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may face risks related to our ability to receive regulatory approvals required to complete certain acquisitions, mergers, joint ventures, and other developments, as well as other potential delays in completing certain transactions.
 
Our growth may be fueled, in part, by the acquisition of existing gaming and development properties. In addition to standard closing conditions, our material transactions, including but not limited to acquisitions, are often conditioned on the receipt of regulatory approvals and other hurdles that create uncertainty and could increase costs. Such delays could significantly reduce the benefits to us of such transactions and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face a number of challenges prior to opening new or upgraded facilities.
No assurance can be given that, when we endeavor to open new or upgraded facilities, the expected timetables for opening such facilities will be met in light of the uncertainties inherent in the development of the regulatory framework, construction, the licensing process, legislative action and litigation. Delays in opening new or upgraded facilities could lead to increased costs and delays in receiving anticipated revenues with respect to such facilities and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Insufficient or lower-than-expected results generated from our new developments and acquired properties may negatively affect our operating results and financial condition.
 
There can be no assurance that the revenues generated from our new developments and acquired properties will be sufficient to pay related expenses if and when these developments are completed; or, even if revenues are sufficient to pay expenses, that the new developments and acquired properties will yield an adequate return or any return on our significant investments. Our projects, if completed, may take significantly longer than we expect to generate returns, if any. Moreover, lower-than-expected results from the opening of a new facility may negatively affect our operating results and financial condition and may make it more difficult to raise capital.
 
Rising operating costs at our gaming properties could have a negative impact on our business.
 
The operating expenses associated with our gaming properties could increase due to, among other reasons, the following factors:

26



 
changes in federal, state or local tax or regulations, including state gaming regulations or gaming taxes, could impose additional restrictions or increase our operating costs;
aggressive marketing and promotional campaigns by our competitors for an extended period of time could force us to increase our expenditures for marketing and promotional campaigns in order to maintain our existing customer base or attract new customers;
as our properties age, we may need to increase our expenditures for repairs, maintenance, and to replace equipment necessary to operate our business in amounts greater than what we have spent historically;
an increase in the cost of health care benefits for our employees could have a negative impact on our financial results;
our reliance on slot play revenues and any additional costs imposed on us from vendors;
availability and cost of the many products and service we provide our customers, including food, beverages, retail items, entertainment, hotel rooms, spa and golf services;
availability and costs associated with insurance;
increase in costs of labor;
our properties use significant amounts of electricity, natural gas and other forms of energy, and energy price increases may adversely affect our cost structure; and
our properties use significant amounts of water, and a water shortage may adversely affect our operations.
 
If our operating expenses increase without any offsetting increase in our revenues, our results of operations would suffer.
 
We may experience an impairment of our goodwill, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
 
We have recognized a substantial amount of goodwill in connection with the purchase of our owned properties. We test goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. A significant amount of judgment is involved in performing fair value estimates for goodwill since the results are based on estimated future cash flows and assumptions related thereto. Significant assumptions include estimates of future sales and expense trends, liquidity and capitalization, among other factors. We base our fair value estimates on projected financial information, which we believe to be reasonable. However, actual results may differ from those projections. Further, we may need to recognize an impairment of some or all of the goodwill recognized. While such impairment charges do not immediately affect cash flows from operations, they could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our gaming operations rely heavily on technology services and an uninterrupted supply of electrical power. Our security systems and all of our slot machines are controlled by computers and are reliant on electrical power to operate.
 
Any unscheduled disruption in our technology services or interruption in the supply of electrical power could result in an immediate, and possibly substantial, loss of revenues due to a shutdown of our gaming operations. Such interruptions may occur as a result of, for example, a failure of our information technology or related systems, catastrophic events or rolling blackouts. Our systems are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, computer denial-of-service attacks and similar events.


 
Our information technology and other systems are subject to cyber security risk, including misappropriation of customer information or other breaches of information security.
 
We rely on information technology and other systems to maintain and transmit our customers’ personal and financial information, credit cardcredit-card settlements, credit cardcredit-card funds transmissions, mailing lists and reservations information. We have taken steps designed to safeguard our customers’ confidential personal information and have implemented systems designed to meet all requirements of the Payment Card Industry standards for data protection. However, our information and processes are subject to the ever-changing threat of compromised security in the form of a risk of potential breach, system failure, computer virus, or unauthorized or fraudulent use by customers, company employees, or employees of third partythird-party vendors. The steps we take to deter and mitigate these risks may not be successful, and any resulting compromise or loss of data or systems could adversely impact operations or regulatory compliance and could result in remedial expenses, fines, litigation, and loss of reputation, potentially impacting our financial results.
 


27



We are subject to environmental laws and potential exposure to environmental liabilities.
 
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern our operations, including emissions and discharges into the environment, and the handling and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous substances and wastes. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could result in costs for corrective action, penalties or the imposition of other liabilities or restrictions.  To date, none of these matters have had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that such matters will not have such an effect in the future.  We also are subject to laws and regulations that impose liability and clean-up responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Under certain of these laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of property may be liable for the costs of remediating contaminated soil or groundwater on or from its property, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or caused, the contamination, as well as incur liability to third parties impacted by such contamination. The presence of contamination, or failure to remediate it properly, may adversely affect our ability to use, sell or rent property. To date, none of these matters or other matters arising under environmental laws has had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that such matters will not have such an effect in the future. 

The concentration and evolution of the slot machine manufacturing industry could impose additional costs on us.
��
A majority of our revenues are attributable to slot machines and related systems operated by us at our gaming facilities. It is important, for competitive reasons, that we offer popular and up-to-date slot machine games to our customers.
 
A substantial majority of the slot machines sold in the U.S. in recent years were manufactured by only a few companies, and there has been recent consolidation activity within the gaming equipment sector.
 
In recent years, slot machine manufacturers have frequently refused to sell slot machines featuring the most popular games, instead requiring participation lease arrangements. Participation slot machine leasing arrangements typically often require the payment of a fixed daily rental or a percentage payment of coin-in or net win. Generally, a participation lease is substantially more expensive over the long term than the cost to purchase a new machine.
 
For competitive reasons, we may be forced to purchase new slot machines or enter into participation lease arrangements that are more expensive than our current costs associated with the continued operation of our existing slot machines. If the newer slot machines do not result in sufficient incremental revenues to offset the increased investment and participation lease costs, it could hurt our profitability.
 
We depend on our key personnel.
 
We are highly dependent on the services of our executive management team and other members of our senior management team.  Our ability to attract and retain key personnel is affected by the competitiveness of our compensation packages and the other terms and conditions of employment, our continued ability to compete effectively against other gaming companies, and our growth prospects. The loss of the services of any members of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
We are subject to litigation which, if adversely determined, could cause us to incur substantial losses.
 
From time to time during the normal course of operating our businesses, we are subject to various litigation claims and legal disputes. Some of the litigation claims may not be covered under our insurance policies, or our insurance carriers may seek to deny coverage. As a result, we might also be required to incur significant legal fees, which may have a material adverse effect


on our financial position. In addition, because we cannot accurately predict the outcome of any action, it is possible that, as a result of current and/or future litigation, we will be subject to adverse judgments or settlements that could significantly reduce our earnings or result in losses.
 
Subsequent phases to certain of our existing projects and potential enhancements at our properties may require us to raise additional capital.
We may need to access the capital markets or otherwise obtain additional funds to complete subsequent phases of our existing projects and to fund potential enhancements we may undertake at our facilities there. We do not know when or if the capital markets will permit us to raise additional funds for such phases and enhancements in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, or at all. Inability to access the capital markets, or the availability of capital only on less-than-favorable terms, may force us to delay, reduce or cancel our subsequent phases and enhancement projects.

28



Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets for future offerings may also be limited by our financial condition, results of operations or other factors, such as our credit rating or outlook at the time of any such financing or offering and the covenants in our existing debt agreements, as well as by general economic conditions and contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. As we seek additional financing, we will be subject to the risks of rising interest rates and other factors affecting the financial markets.
The market price for our common stock may be volatile, and youinvestors may not be able to sell our stock at a favorable price or at all.
 
Many factors could cause the market price of our common stock to rise and fall, including:
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly results of operations;
change in market valuations of companies in our industry;
change in expectations of future financial performance;
regulatory changes;
fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes;
issuance of common stock market prices and volumes;
the addition or departure of key personnel; and
announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, investments, dispositions, joint ventures or other significant business decisions. 

In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to companies’ operating performance. Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, shareholder derivative lawsuits and/or securities class actionclass-action litigation has often been instituted against that company. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
 

29




Item 2. Properties.
The following describes our principal real estate properties. All owned properties listed below and substantially all other assets secure our indebtedness in connection with our First Lien Credit Agreement with Capital One Bank, N.A. (“First Lien Credit Facility”) and our Second Lien Credit Agreement with ABC Funding, LLC (“Second Lien Credit Facility”), as discussed in Note 67 to the consolidated financial statements set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.
 
Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel
We own the facilities and related improvements at the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel located near Bay St. Louis, Mississippi.and Hotel. The property offers a casino withincludes approximately 37,000 square feet of gaming space, a surface parking lot, an approximately 800-space parking garage and a newly constructed 129-room hotel including nine suites.hotel. The propertycasino and hotel are located on 38 acres of leased land, including 31 acres of protected marshlands, that wemarshlands. The lease pursuant to a Land Lease with Option to Purchase, as amended, which expires on April 30, 2058. The2058 and contains a purchase option that can be exercised from February 2019 through October 2027.  We also lease approximately five acres of land occupied by the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel gaming officeoffices and warehouse space, as well as a small parcel of land with a building. building and sign. 

Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel

Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel is located on approximately 1.86 acres of owned land and 2.15 acres of leased land in Cripple Creek, Colorado. The property includes approximately 17,000 square feet of gaming space, 24 hotel rooms and several acres of surface parking. A portion of the casino, fourteen of the property's 24 hotel rooms and a portion of the parking lots are subject to a long-term lease that includes renewal options in three-year increments to 2035 and a purchase option that can be exercised at any time.

Rising Star Casino Resort
We own the Rising Star Casino Resort in Rising Sun, Indiana on the Ohio River.Indiana.  The property consists of a dockside riverboat on the Ohio River with approximately 40,000 square feet of gaming space, a land-based pavilion with approximately 30,000 square feet of meeting and convention space, a 190-room hotel, surface parking and an 18-hole golf course on approximately 311 acres. In addition, a third party constructed a 104-room hotel operated by us that opened in 2013 on property adjacent to Rising Star Casino Resort, bringing total room capacity to 294.  Through our Indiana subsidiary,Additionally, we lease thisa 104-room hotel pursuant to a capital lease that expires in October 2027 and includes an option to purchase the hotel during the term of the lease at a pre-set price or at the end of the term for $1 plus closing costs. Upon expiration of the term of the lease, if we have not exercised our option to purchase the hotel, the Landlord shall havelandlord also has the right and option to sell us the hotel for $1 plus closing costs. On March 16, 2016, we made amendments to the hotel lease that: (i) extend the initial term of the hotel lease by four years to October 1, 2027, (ii) reduce the monthly rent, and (iii) require us to invest $1 million of capital improvements into Rising Star Casino Resort. We intend to invest in a new restaurant concept on the riverboat casino, renovate its existing steakhouse, and implement a ferry boat service to Kentucky.
See Notes 7 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements set forth in “Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

Stockman’s Casino
Included as part of our Northern Nevada segment, we own Stockman’s Casino, located on approximately five acres in Fallon, Nevada. Stockman’s Casino includes approximately 8,400 square feet of gaming space, a fine dining restaurant, a coffee shop and adjacent surface parking.
 
Grand Lodge Casino

Included as part of our Northern Nevada segment, the Grand Lodge Casino has 18,900 square feet of gaming space and is integrated into the Hyatt Regency Lake Tahoe in Incline Village, Nevada on the north shore of Lake Tahoe.  We operate the Grand Lodge Casino pursuant to a lease expiring on August 31, 2023 and own the personal property, including slot machines.  The lease is secured by the Company’s interests under the lease and is subordinate to the liens in the First and Second Lien Credit Facilities. Beginning on January 1, 2019, the Lessor has an option to purchase theour leasehold interest and the operating assets of the Grand Lodge Casino. The option purchase price is an amount equal to the Grand Lodge Casino’s positive working capital, plus Grand Lodge Casino’s EBITDA for the twelve-month period preceding the acquisition (or pro-rated if less than twelve months remain on the lease), plus the fair market value of the Grand Lodge Casino’s personal property (including slot machines).
    
Additionally, we entered into an agreement with the Lessor to rent a lakeside villa, which includes four rooms, for use by our designated casino guests. The agreement commences on June 1, 2016, includes a six month termination clauselease expires in August 2023, but can be terminated by either party and matures on August 31, 2023, or earlier as defined.at any time with six months' notice.

Other
We lease 5,942 square feet of corporate office space in Las Vegas, Nevada pursuant to an amended lease agreement whichthat expires on May 31, 2018.   We do not intend to renew this lease.
In August 2016, the Company executed a lease for 4,479 square feet of new corporate office space in Las Vegas, Nevada with rent commencing upon move-in and includes a maturity date in 7.6 years. We anticipate moving into the space during 2017.


We own 1.29 acres of vacant land and a single family residence located in Burlington, Kentucky, both of which werewas purchased to facilitate a potential ferry boat service between Rising Star and Kentucky.

30




Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
In 2013 and 2014, we expended approximately $1.6 million to repair defects to the parking garage at the Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel. The parking garage was originally built in 2007, and we acquired the property in 2012, discovering later that there were defects in the original construction. We hired outside legal counsel to pursue the reimbursement of such costs from the contractor and architect, who neglected to install certain structural elements required by the building codes. During the third quarter of 2015, the case was dismissed in favor of the defendants, as the statutes of repose had expired. We filed an appeal on November 2, 2015 on the basis that there were elements in the case that would have extended our right to seek reimbursement of the remedial costs. On November 25, 2015, we entered into a settlement and release agreement with the architect, and on January 12, 2016, we filed an appellate brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit") with respect to our litigation with the contractor. On August 31, 2016, oral arguments were heard in the Fifth Circuit and on January 6, 2017, the Fifth Circuit reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case back to the District Court for trial.  On January 20, 2017, the contractor filed a petition for rehearing in the Fifth Circuit, which was denied on February 7, 2017. The Company expects a trial to be set during the third or fourth quarter of 2017. During March 2017, the Company filed a lawsuit against the contractor's insurance company.
We are subject to various legal and administrative proceedings relating to personal injuries, employment matters, commercial transactions and other matters arising in the normal course of business.  We do not believe that the final outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We maintain what we believe is adequate insurance coverage to further mitigate the risks of such proceedings.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.

31




PART II
 
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
 
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “FLL.”  The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low sale prices of our common stock.
 
High LowHigh Low
Year Ended December 31, 2015    
  
First Quarter$1.60
 $1.10
$1.60
 $1.10
Second Quarter1.79
 1.42
1.79
 1.42
Third Quarter1.79
 1.18
1.79
 1.18
Fourth Quarter1.75
 1.31
1.75
 1.31
Year Ended December 31, 2014 
  
Year Ended December 31, 2016   
First Quarter$2.79
 $1.92
$1.78
 $1.31
Second Quarter2.23
 1.18
2.08
 1.38
Third Quarter1.59
 0.87
2.08
 1.71
Fourth Quarter1.65
 1.07
2.49
 1.56
 
On March 25, 2016,14, 2017, the last sale price of our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market was $1.55$2.32 and we had 9790 registered holders of record of our common stock. A substantial portion of holders of our common stock are "street name" or beneficial holders whose shares of record are held by banks, brokers, and other financial institutions. Such holders are not taken into consideration in the number of "registered holders" above.
 
Dividend Policy
 
We have not paid any dividends on our common stock to date.  The payment of dividends in the future will be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any; the terms of our indebtedness; our capital requirements; growth opportunities; and general financial condition.  Our debt covenants restrict the payment of dividends and it is the present intention of our board of directors to retain all earnings, if any, for use in our business operations, debt reduction and growth initiatives.  Accordingly, we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.
 

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.
 
As a "smallersmaller reporting company",company, as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities and Exchange Commission,Act, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
 

32



Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read together with the other financial information and consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in Item 1A. "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this report. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods. Full House Resorts, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, may be referred to as “Full House”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”.
 
Executive Overview
 
Our primary business is the ownership andand/or operation of casino and related hospitality and entertainment facilities, which includes offering gaming, hotel, dining, entertainment, retail and other amenities. We own or operate fourfive casino properties in Mississippi, Colorado, Indiana and Nevada. We view our Mississippi, Colorado and Indiana properties as distinct operating segments and both of our Nevada properties as one operating segment.
 


Our portfolio consists of the following:
Property 
Acquisition
Date
 Location 
Slot
Machines
 
Table
Games
 
Hotel
Rooms
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel (owned) 2012 
Hancock County, MS
(near New Orleans)
 955 29 
129(1)
Rising Star Casino Resort (owned) 2011 
Rising Sun, IN
(near Cincinnati)
 944 25 
294(2)
Stockman’s Casino (owned) 2007 
Fallon, NV
(one hour east of Reno)
 235 4 
Grand Lodge Casino (leased and part of the Hyatt Regency Lake Tahoe Resort) 2011 
Incline Village, NV
(North Shore of Lake Tahoe)
 255 20 (3)
(1)Property
Acquisition
Date
Location
Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel opened its newly constructed hotel in phases from May 2015 through September 2015.
2012
Hancock County, MS
(near New Orleans)
(2)Bronco Billy's Casino and HotelIncludes a 190-room hotel that we own, and a 104-room hotel that we lease pursuant to a capital lease.
2016
Cripple Creek, CO
(near Colorado Springs)
(3)Rising Star Casino ResortUnder the Facilities Agreement with Hyatt Equities, L.L.C., we have the ability to provide rooms to our guests at2011
Rising Sun, IN
(near Cincinnati)
Stockman’s Casino2007
Fallon, NV
(one hour east of Reno)
Grand Lodge Casino (leased and part of the Hyatt Regency at Lake Tahoe upon mutually agreeable rates, as well as other amenities and services that cater to our guests and support our operations.Resort)2011
Incline Village, NV
(North Shore of Lake Tahoe)

Until our three-year contract expired on September 23, 2014, we managed Buffalo Thunder Casino and Resort, Cities of Gold and other gaming facilities near Santa Fe, New Mexico for the Pueblo of Pojoaque.

While we do provide credit at some of our casinos where we are permitted to by gaming regulations, most of our revenues are cash-based, through customers wagering with cash or paying for non-gaming services with cash or credit cards. Our revenues are primarily derived from gaming revenues, which include revenues from slot machines, table games and live keno. In addition, we derive a significant amount of revenue from our hotel rooms and our food and beverage outlets. We also derive revenues from our golf course (at Rising Star Casino Resort), retail outlets and entertainment. Promotional allowances consist primarily of hotel rooms and food and beverages furnished to customers on a complimentary basis. The retail value of such services is included in the respective revenue classifications and is then deducted as promotional allowances to calculate net revenues. 

Our financial results are dependent upon the number of patrons that we attract to our properties and the amounts those guests spend per visit. Additionally, our operating results may be impacted by, among other things, overall economic conditions affecting the disposable income of our guests, weather conditions affecting our properties, achieving and maintaining cost efficiencies, competitive factors, gaming tax increases and other regulatory changes, the commencement of new gaming operations and expansion or enhancement at existing facilities. We may experience significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to seasonality, variations in gaming hold percentages and other factors. Consequently, our operating results for any quarter or year are not necessarily comparable and may not be indicative of future periods’ results. Our industry is capital-intensive, and we rely on the ability of our properties to generate operating cash flow to pay interest, repay debt costs and fund maintenance capital expenditures.

33




We use several key performance indicators to evaluate the operations of our properties. These key performance indicators include the following:

 Gaming revenue indicators:

Slot coin-in is the gross dollar amount wagered in slot machines and table game drop is the total amount of cash or promises to pay (“markers”)credit exchanged into chips for use at the Company’s table games. Slot coin-in and table game drop are indicators of volume.

Slot win is the difference between customer wagers and customer winnings on slot machines. Table game hold is the difference between net winnings by customers and the amount of money or markers exchanged into chips. Slot win and table game hold percentages represent the relationship between slot coin-in and table game drop to gaming wins and losses.

 Room revenue indicators:

Hotel occupancy rate is an indicator of the utilization of our available rooms; average daily rate (“ADR”) is a price indicator; and hotel revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) is the product of the two and indicates the overall revenue generation of the hotel. Complimentary room sales, or the retail value of accommodations gratuitously furnished to customers, are included in the calculation of the hotel occupancy rate, ADR and RevPAR.

Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Property EBITDA and Adjusted Property EBITDA:EBITDA margin:

Management also uses Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Property EBITDA as measures of performance as more fully explained and discussed later herein. Adjusted Property EBITDA margin is a measure of operating profitability and is calculated by dividing Adjusted Property EBITDA by the property's net revenues. For a description of these measures, see "Non-GAAP Measures" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Credit Facilities - Covenants".

2015

2016 Highlights

Bronco Billy's Acquisition and Amended and Restated Credit Facilities

On September 27, 2015, throughMay 13, 2016, we completed our wholly-owned subsidiary FHR-Colorado LLC, we entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement with Pioneer Group, Inc. to acquire the operating assets and assume certain liabilitiesacquisition of Bronco Billy’sBilly's Casino and Hotel in Cripple Creek, Colorado from Pioneer Group, Inc. for a purchase priceconsideration of $30$31.1 million, subject toincluding an adjustment for net working capital ("Bronco Billy's Purchase Agreement"). Accordingly, we made a non-refundable (except under certain conditions) deposit of $2.5 million which will be credited againstcapital. Concurrent with the purchase price upon closing. The Bronco Billy's Purchase Agreement may be terminated by Pioneer Group, Inc. if the closing has not taken place by May 14, 2016, which includes up to four 30-day extensions that we may exercise to obtain required gaming approvals. The fourth extension period requires us to increase our deposit by $100,000 by April 14, 2016. On February 18, 2016, the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission approved us for the necessary licenses required for our pending acquisition of Bronco Billy’s.Billy's, we entered into an amended and restated First Lien Credit Facility ("First Lien Credit Facility") with a group of banks led by Capital One Bank, N.A., ("Capital One"), which includes a First Term Loan of $45 million and Revolving Loan of $2 million. We expectalso entered into an amended and restated Second Lien Credit Facility ("Second Lien Credit Facility") with ABC Funding, LLC which included a term loan facility increase from $20 million to $55 million, of which the additional proceeds of $35 million were primarily used to complete our refinancing and closeacquisition of Bronco Billy's.  As part of the Second Lien Credit Facility, on May 13, 2016, the pending acquisition inCompany granted the second quarterlien lenders 1,006,568 redeemable warrants.

Bronco Billy’s has approximately 807 slot and video poker machines, 12 table games, a 24-room hotel, a steakhouse, and four casual-dining outlets. This acquisition diversified our operations into a new geographical market.

Rights Offering

On August 15, 2016, the Company announced a $5.0 million rights offering. A registration statement on Form S-3 relating to these securities was declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 6, 2016. The rights offering commenced on October 7, 2016 and the Company distributed, at no charge, non-transferable subscription rights to the holders of 2016, subjectthe Company's common stock as of August 25, 2016. Daniel R. Lee, President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of the Company, guaranteed the completion of the offering through a standby purchase agreement.

The Company closed on its rights offering on November 10, 2016. The Company received a total of $5.0 million of gross proceeds ($4.64 million of net proceeds after offering costs) from the rights offering through the issuance of 3,846,154 shares of common stock at a price of $1.30 per share. The net proceeds from the rights offering will be used to obtainingpartially fund certain capital expenditure growth projects at our existing properties, as well as for general corporate purposes.

Shareholders directly subscribed for approximately 2.7 million shares under the remaining required regulatory approvalsrights offering, representing approximately 71% of the shares being offered. Shareholders also subscribed for more than 4.8 million shares via oversubscription rights, which significantly exceeded the number of available oversubscription shares.

Mr. Lee and other customary closing conditions. The transaction is not subjectvarious family-related accounts exercised their basic subscription and oversubscription rights related to a financing or due diligence condition, though we performed substantial due diligenceshares purchased prior to executionthe offering. Additionally, in connection with the standby purchase agreement that the Company entered into with Mr. Lee on October 7, 2016, Mr. Lee purchased 1,000,000 additional shares, which are restricted shares under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the standby purchase agreement, Mr. Lee (i) agreed to hold such shares for a minimum period, (ii) received reimbursement of his legal fees, (iii) received a priority right to purchase the first 1,000,000 shares that remained after shareholders exercised their basic subscription rights, and sale(iv) received registration rights from the Company with respect to such purchased shares. Mr. Lee received no payment for providing the standby purchase agreement. We intend to finance the acquisition concurrent with the refinancing of our outstanding first and second lien debt.
In September 2015, we completed our newly constructed 129-room hotel overlooking the waterfront at Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel. The hotel opened in phases, beginning with 72 rooms in late May 2015. We opened an additional 24 rooms in both June and July, and the nine luxury suites were completed in September. The approximate cost of the hotel, inclusive of the design change and capitalized interest, was $20.5 million.

In December 2015, we amended our lease with Hyatt Equities L.L.C. ("Hyatt") through which we operate the Grand Lodge Casino at the Hyatt Regency Lake Tahoe Resort, Spa & Casino in Incline Village, Nevada. The amendment extends the initial term of the lease by five years to August 31, 2023; provides that Hyatt may not exercise its option to purchase (i) our leasehold interest under the lease, and (ii) our assets used in its gaming operations at the property, before January 1, 2019; and increases the monthly rent from $125,000 to (i) $145,833 commencing on January 1, 2017, and (ii) $166,667 commencing on January 1, 2018. Additionally, Hyatt, in consultation with us, will renovate the casino at its sole cost and expense not to exceed $3.5 million, and we, in consultation with Hyatt, will purchase new gaming devices and equipment at its sole cost and expense not to exceed $1.5 million. We currently expect to incur the entire $1.5 million, and each party must complete its respective obligations by February 25, 2017.


34



Results of Operations - 20152016 Compared to 20142015

Consolidated operating results

The following summarizes our consolidated operating results for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014:2015:

(In thousands)For the Year Ended December 31,  
 2015 2014 Percent Change
Net revenues$124,588
 $121,421
 2.6 %
Operating expenses119,544
 135,259
 (11.6)%
Operating income (loss)5,044
 (13,838) (136.5)%
Interest expense(6,715) (6,272) 7.1 %
Settlement loss
 (1,700) (100.0)%
Income tax benefit(342) (988) NM
Net loss(1,317) (20,845) NM
NM - not meaningful
(In thousands)For the Year Ended December 31,  
 2016 2015 Percent Change
Net revenues$145,992
 $124,431
 17.3 %
Operating expenses139,803
 119,387
 17.1 %
Operating income6,189
 5,044
 22.7 %
Interest and other non-operating expenses, net10,653
 6,703
 58.9 %
Income tax provision (benefit)630
 (342) (284.2)%
Net loss$(5,094) $(1,317) 286.8 %

(In thousands)For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31,  
2015 2014 Percent Change2016 2015 Percent Change
Casino revenues          
Slots$96,584
 $94,239
 2.5 %$113,192
 $96,428
 17.4%
Table games15,014
 14,968
 0.3 %18,018
 15,014
 20.0%
Other322
 359
 (10.3)%374
 322
 16.1%
111,920

109,566
 2.1 %131,584

111,764
 17.7%
          
Non-casino revenues, net          
Food and beverage9,118
 7,768
 17.4 %9,925
 9,118
 8.9%
Hotel1,090
 822
 32.6 %1,547
 1,090
 41.9%
Other2,460
 2,199
 11.9 %2,936
 2,459
 19.4%
12,668
 10,789
 17.4 %14,408
 12,667
 13.7%
Management fees
 1,066
 (100)%
    
Total net revenues$124,588
 $121,421
 2.6 %$145,992
 $124,431
 17.3%


The following discussion is based on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, unless otherwise described.

Revenues. Consolidated net revenues increased despite17.3% due to our acquisition of Bronco Billy's and increases at each of our properties. Excluding Bronco Billy's, our consolidated net revenues increased 4.3%. At Silver Slipper, the expirationcompletion of the tribal management contract.new hotel in September 2015 resulted in a full year of hotel operations during 2016, thus leading to increases in both customer volumes and casino revenue. At our Silver Slipper segment, both casino and non-casino revenues rose significantly, reflecting the phased opening of the property's hotel during the second and third quarters, strategic promotional activity and enhancements to our food offerings. The increase at Silver Slipper was partially offset by lower casino revenue at our Rising Star, segment, which was affected by increased competition,marketing enhancements and atother customer-focused initiatives resulted in increases in both slots and table games revenue. At our Northern Nevada segment, where weather conditions resultedGrand Lodge Casino experienced an increase in a poorcasino revenues primarily due to an improved ski season in early 2016 in the Lake Tahoe region. Stockman's Casino saw an increase in casino revenue due to modest physical improvements at the property and we incurred an unfavorable swing in win percentage. Additionally, in September 2014,marketing enhancements.

See further information within our management contract with the Pueblo of Pojoaque Tribe expired, as reflected in our Development/Management segment.reportable segmentsdescribed below.

Operating expenses. Consolidated operating expenses decreasedincreased 17.1%, primarily due to $11.5 millionas a result of impairment charges in 2014 at our Rising Star segment. Additionally, there were $2.7 million of board and executive transition costs during 2014 resulting from significant changes in the Company’s board of directors and management. During 2015, selling, general and administrative expenses declined primarily due to a $1.4 million property tax refund from a settlement with Ohio County, a $450,000 net settlement with the Nambe Pueblo Tribe, and $0.6 million of offering costs incurred during 2014, partially offset by increased costs at our Silver Slipper segment in 2015. Depreciation and amortization decreased primarily due to certain fixed

35



assets becoming fully depreciated and our acquired customer loyalty programs becoming fully amortized. These decreases were partially offset by increased food and beverage and hotel costs at our Silver Slipper segment, and increased project and development costs for the pending acquisition of Bronco Billy's, and the American Place proposal.increases in casino expenses and selling, general and administrative costs. Excluding Bronco Billy's, our operating expenses increased 5.4%.

See further information within our reportable segmentsdescribed below.



Interest expense.and other non-operating expense, net.

Interest Expense

(In thousands)For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Interest cost (excluding debt issuance cost amortization)$5,539
 $5,150
$8,422
 $5,539
Amortization of debt issuance costs1,615
 1,500
1,064
 1,615
Capitalized interest(439) (378)
 (439)
$6,715
 $6,272
$9,486
 $6,715

The above increase in interest cost above was dueprimarily attributed to the debt refinancing on May 13, 2016, which resulted in $35 million of additional debt incurred to construct the hotel at Silver Slipper and an increase in interest rate for the Second Lien Credit Facility.proceeds.

Settlement Loss. DuringOther non-operating expense, net    

Other non-operating expense consisted of $0.6 million of debt modification costs in conjunction with the thirdrefinancing and a change in the fair value of our common stock warrant liability of $0.5 million. The common stock warrant liability is adjusted to fair value each quarter of 2014,with the Company settled its lawsuit with Majestic Star Casino LLC ("Majestic Star") and Majestic Mississippi, LLC ("Majestic Mississippi")increase in fair value primarily related to the Company's attempted purchase of the Fitz Tunica Casino & Hotel. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, Majestic Star and Majestic Mississippi received $1.7 million of the funds heldincrease in escrow which was recorded by the Company as a settlement loss.our share price.

Income tax benefit.taxes. We hadThe Company's effective income tax benefitsrate for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was (14.1)% and 2014. These benefits were20.6%, respectively. Our tax rate differs from the statutory rate of 34.0% primarily due to the effects of changes in our valuation allowance against our deferredand items that are permanently treated differently for GAAP and tax assets. Inpurposes, with such differences being amplified by the prior-year periods, we accrued a provision forCompany's low pre-taxable income taxes, but recorded a full valuation allowance against our federal and certain state deferred tax assets(loss) during the fourth quarter of 2014. We assessed the realizability of deferred tax assets and concluded that we did not meet the "more likely than not" threshold under GAAP to recognize certain deferred tax assets. As a result, during 2014, a valuation allowance of $7 million was recorded against federal and certain state deferred tax assets, which also resulted in a tax rate substantially below statutory rates.recent periods. During 2015,2016, we continued to provide a valuation allowance against our remaining deferred tax assets, after being utilized bynet of any available deferred tax liabilities for all jurisdictions.liabilities. In future years, if it is determined that we do meet the "more likely than not" threshold of utilizing our deferred tax assets, we may qualify to reverse some or all of our valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

Our 2014 federalDuring 2016, we did not pay cash taxes or receive any tax return resulted in a tax loss whichrefunds. During 2015, we elected to carry-back to taxable income earned during 2012, in accordance with IRS rules. This carry-back resulted in anreceived income tax refundrefunds of $3.7$4.0 million during 2015.primarily from our federal loss carry-back election related to our 2014 tax return.

We do not expect to pay any federal income taxes or receive any federal tax refunds related to our 20152016 results. Tax losses incurred in 20152016 may shelter taxable income in future years, but because of the level of uncertainty regarding sufficient prospective income, we maintain a full valuation allowance against our netremaining deferred tax assets. assets, as mentioned above.

See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements set forth in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, for a more detailed discussion. 

Operating results – reportable segments

We manage our casinos based on geographic regions within the United States. Accordingly, Stockman’s Casino and Grand Lodge Casino comprise aour Northern Nevada business segment, while Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel, Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel and Rising Star Casino Resort and the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel are currently distinct segments. We previously managed certain casinos owned by Native American tribes andno longer have a Development/Management segment, as we also consider our fee-based casino development and management servicesdid in 2014, as a segment, although none of our current casinowe did not manage any properties are managed for others. others during the reporting periods.
 
The following table presents detail by segment of our consolidated net revenue and Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014.2015. Management uses Adjusted Property EBITDA as the primary profit measure for its reportable segments. See "Non-GAAP Measures" for additional information.
 

36




(In Thousands)For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31,  
2015 2014 Percent Change2016 2015 Percent Change
Net Revenues          
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel$56,837
 $48,023
 18.4 %
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel$59,093
 $56,836
 4.0 %
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel16,220
 
 n/a
Rising Star Casino Resort47,557
 51,110
 (7.0)%49,472
 47,557
 4.0 %
Northern Nevada Casinos20,194
 21,222
 (4.8)%21,207
 20,038
 5.8 %
Development/Management
 1,066
 (100.0)%
$124,588
 $121,421
 2.6 %$145,992
 $124,431
 17.3 %
Adjusted EBITDA 
  
  
 
  
  
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel$9,925
 $7,501
 32.3 %
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel$9,994
 $9,925
 0.7 %
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel3,423
 
 n/a
Rising Star Casino Resort4,005
 2,174
 84.2 %2,931
 4,005
 (26.8)%
Northern Nevada Casinos3,877
 4,466
 (13.2)%3,941
 3,877
 1.7 %
Development/Management
 1,066
 (100.0)%
Corporate and other(3,843) (4,506) 14.7 %(4,105) (3,843) (6.8)%
$13,964
 $10,701
 30.5 %$16,184
 $13,964
 15.9 %
 
Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel
    
Net revenues increased 4.0% primarily due to highera full year of hotel operations of the hotel, which opened in phases between May and September 2015. The hotel helped grow both customer counts and gaming volumes reflecting the phased opening of our hotel, strategic promotional activity and enhancements to our food offerings.in 2016. Slot revenue increased 15.4%,4.9% and table games revenue rose 24.3%6.9%, primarily due to increases in slot handle and table games drop, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in non-gaming net revenues (principally food and beverage revenues) grew 39.9 % comparedof 6.4% due to reduction of certain promotional activities. Our hotel occupancy during 2016 was 88.1% versus 71.8% in the prior year.partial-year period.

Adjusted Property EBITDA increased significantly0.7% primarily due to the gamingrevenue increase noted above, and non-gaming revenue increases described above. Casino, non-casino and selling, general and administrativepartially offset by increased expenses increased by less than thedue to a full year of hotel operations, an increase in gaming revenues. As a result,promotional and marketing activity (other than food and beverage promotions), and higher property taxes due to the hotel. Adjusted Property EBITDA margin improved towas 16.9% versus 17.5% from 15.6%.in the prior-year period.
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel

As described above in our Executive Overview section, we acquired Bronco Billy's on May 13, 2016. The market is seasonal, favoring the summer months.     

Net revenues from May 13, 2016 through December 31, 2016 were $16.2 million, consisting of $13.8 million of slot revenues, $0.9 million of table games revenues, and $1.5 million of non-gaming net revenues. Non-gaming revenues at Bronco Billy's are primarily food and beverage revenues.

Adjusted Property EBITDA increasefrom May 13, 2016 through December 31, 2016 was $3.4 million and the resultAdjusted Property EBITDA margin was 21.1%. The property has performed in accordance with expectations.

For further information about the fair values of improvements in each quarter as follows: 26.2% in the first quarter, 25.1% inassets acquired and liabilities assumed at the second quarter, 39.0% in the third quarter, and 43.0% in the fourth quarter, comparedacquisition date, see Note 3 to the prior-year periods. The higher increasesconsolidated financial statements set forth in the second half of the year primarily reflect the opening of the hotel.“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

Rising Star Casino Resort

Net revenues decreased primarily as a result of competitive pressure from new casinos in Ohio, resulting in a decline in gaming volumes at Rising Star.increased 4.0% due to marketing enhancements and other customer-focused initiatives. Slot revenue decreased 7.6% andincreased 0.5%, table games revenue decreased 11%, whileincreased 19.7% due to increases in both table games drop and the win percentage, and non-gaming revenues (including food and beverage, hotel, golf and retail) increased 3.9%. During the fourth quarter, we enacted new marketing initiatives that helped increase net revenues by 10.9% comparedincreased 12.1%. Our hotel occupancy during 2016 increased to 85.6% from 83.7% in the prior-year period, resulting in the first quarterly increase since we purchased the property in 2011.period.

WeDuring 2015, we resolved a property tax dispute with the local governmental authorities, resulting in a $1.4 million property tax refund for the tax years 2011 through 2014 and an approximatelyapproximate $0.4 million reduction in annual property taxes during 2015.2015 and 2016. The refund was a reversal of property taxes previously expensed and resulted in a credit to operating expenses during the third quarter of 2015.



Adjusted Property EBITDA increased primarilydecreased 26.8% due to the property tax refund and a reductionreceived in current-year property taxes, cost containment measures affecting casino and selling, general and administrative expenses, and the improved fourth quarterprior-year period as described above. Apart fromabove and increased marketing and advertising costs in 2016, partially offset by the property tax resolution, Adjusted Property EBITDA still rose significantly in 2015 versus 2014. In addition to an increase in thenet revenues. Adjusted Property EBITDA margin towas 5.9% versus 8.4% from 4.3% in the prior-year period, 2015 waswhich included the first increaseproperty tax refund. Comparing Rising Star and Silver Slipper, Rising Star has a larger physical plant and gaming taxes are higher in annualIndiana than Mississippi, which accounts for much of the difference in Adjusted Property EBITDA since 2012.margin.

Goodwill and other intangible assets are reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. During the second quarter of 2014, we believed such indicators existed, resulting in a $9.9 million and $1.6 million impairment to Rising Star's gaming license and goodwill, respectively. These impairments were driven by various factors, including weak economic conditions, lower than anticipated discretionary consumer spending, and increased competition in the regional market. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for a more detailed discussion.


37



On March 16, 2016, we entered into the first amendment to our capital lease agreement related to our leased hotel. The amendment extended the initial term of the lease by four years to October 1, 2027, modified the rent payment schedule by lowering our monthly payments, and shall causerequires us to make a minimum of $1 million of capital improvements for the benefit ofat Rising Star by March 31, 2017.2017, which the Company intends to satisfy. If the Company does not make the $1 million of improvements, the lease will revert back to the original payment schedule. The implied interest rate for the remainder of the lease is approximately 4.5%.
    
All casinos as currently allowed by law in Indiana and Ohio have now opened. Kentucky does not permit casino gaming. AHowever, a Kentucky Supreme Court decision in 2014 however, may permit a horse racing track in northern Kentucky to install slot machine-like devices. Also, the Indiana legislature passed legislation to allow table games at racetracks beginning in 2020.2021. Although Indiana's two racetracks are not currently allowed to have table games with live dealers, they do offer electronic table games at their facilities. TheseWe believe these prospective and potential increases in competition are much more limited than the legalization and opening of a significant number of casinos in Ohio, which adversely affected the propertyRising Star over the past several years.

Northern Nevada

Net revenues decreasedincreased 5.8% due primarily as a result of decreasedto an improved ski season in the Lake Tahoe region. With elevated snow levels for the 2015/2016 ski season, customer traffic, slot winhandle and table game hold percentages. Slot revenue decreased 4.1%, table games revenue decreased 8.9%, and non-gaming net revenues were flat.

At Grand Lodge Casino, table games drop all increased 5.7% versus the prior year. Table games hold percentage, however, decreased to 13.9% from 16.1%in 2016, especially during the same period. The property's average annual table games hold percentage for the past three years has been 16.2%. Revenues were additionally affected by historically low snow levels in the area, which adversely affected the winter sports season and visitation at the property.

first quarter. At Stockman's Casino, net revenues decreased 4%, primarily as a result of a decreased slot win percentage, although slot coin-in increased 2.1%. The Company madecosmetic facility improvements, marketing enhancements, and certain management and operational changes from mid-2015 helped increase casino revenue by 9.4%. For our Northern Nevada segment overall, these factors resulted in a 16.4% increase in table games revenue, a 3.6% increase in slot revenue and cosmetic facility improvements during the year which helped stabilizea 1.9% increase in non-gaming net revenues during the third and fourth quarters. Amongst these was our decision early in the year to offer more favorable win percentages to customers to enhance our competitive position. While net revenues decreased 11.8% and 4.8% for the first and second quarter, respectively, net revenues increased 1.7% in the third quarter and were flat during the fourth quarter, compared to the prior year periods.revenues.

Adjusted Property EBITDA increased 1.7%, but increases in rent expense at Grand Lodge Casino, which in 2016 included additional rent for a villa, and more promotional activity partially offset increases in revenues. Rent expense at Grand Lodge Casino also increased in exchange for an extension of the Northern Nevada segment decreased duringcasino lease through August 2023 and a $5 million refurbishment of the year primarilycasino space, which is currently underway, $3.5 million of which is being funded by Hyatt. Because there are rent increases within the Hyatt lease at future dates, GAAP requires us to sum the rents due through the term of the lease and divide it by the remaining years of the lease to the swings in slot win and table game hold percentages mentioned above.calculate rent expense. Adjusted Property EBITDA margin decreased to 19.2% from 21%.was 18.6% versus 19.3% in the prior-year period.

The Company's Northern Nevada operations have historically been seasonal, with the summer months accounting for a disproportionate share of its annual profits. In addition,revenues. Additionally, the winter months can be affected by snowfall. The Grand Lodge Casino servesis located near several nearby ski resorts, including Alpine Meadows, Northstar and Squaw Valley. The snow during the 2014/2015 season was below average and the snow for the 2015/2016 season has been above average.

Development/Management

Development/Management net revenues and Adjusted EBITDA decreased during the year due to the expiration in September 2014 of our management agreement with the Pueblo of Pojoaque.

Corporate and Other

Corporate expenses decreased during the yearincreased 6.8% primarily due to decreasedthe hiring of an additional corporate salariesemployee and lower benefitsincreases in health care and other benefit costs.

Non-GAAP Measures    

“Adjusted EBITDA” is earnings before interest and other non-operating income (expense), taxes, depreciation and amortization, pre-opening expenses, impairment charges, asset write-offs, recoveries, gain (loss) from asset disposals, board and executive transition costs, project development and acquisition costs, and non-cash share basedshare-based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA information is presented solely as a supplemental disclosure to reported U.Saccounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America (“GAAP”) measures because management believes these measures are (1) widely used measures of operating performance in the gaming and hospitality industry, (2) a principal basis for valuation of gaming and hospitality companies, and (3) are utilized in the covenants within our debt agreements, although not necessarily defined in the same way as above. “Adjusted Property EBITDA” is Adjusted EBITDA before corporate related costs and expenses which are not allocated to each property. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Property EBITDA are not, however, a measure of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP. Accordingly, these

38



measures should be considered supplemental and not a substitute for operating income (loss), net income (loss) or cash flows as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance or liquidity.


The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) and net loss:

(In thousands)For the Year Ended December 31,For the Year Ended December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Adjusted EBITDA$13,964
 $10,701
$16,184
 $13,964
Depreciation and amortization(7,893) (9,183)(7,928) (7,893)
Impairments
 (11,547)
Write-offs, recoveries and asset disposals, net363
 (524)(344) 363
Board & executive transition costs
 (2,741)
Pre-opening costs(156) 

 (156)
Project development & acquisition costs(891) (296)
Project development and acquisition costs(1,314) (891)
Stock compensation(343) (248)(409) (343)
Operating income (loss)5,044
 (13,838)
Operating income6,189
 5,044
Non-operating expense, net      
Interest expense6,715
 6,272
9,486
 6,715
Settlement loss
 1,700
Other(12) 23
Debt modification costs624
 
Adjustment to fair value of warrants and other543
 (12)
6,703
 7,995
10,653
 6,703
      
Loss before income tax benefit(1,659)
(21,833)
Income tax benefit(342) (988)
Loss before income tax provision (benefit)(4,464)
(1,659)
Income tax provision (benefit)630
 (342)
Net loss$(1,317) $(20,845)$(5,094) $(1,317)


The following tables present reconciliations of operating income (loss) to Adjusted Property EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 (In thousands)For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 (In thousands)
Operating
income (loss)
 
Depreciation
and
amortization
 Write-offs, recoveries and asset disposals Pre-Opening 
Project
development
and acquisition
costs
 
Stock
compensation
 
Adjusted
EBITDA
Operating
income (loss)
 
Depreciation
and
amortization
 Write-offs, recoveries and asset disposals Pre-Opening 
Project
development
and acquisition
costs
 
Stock
compensation
 
Adjusted
EBITDA
Casino properties                          
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel$5,383
 $4,383
 $3
 $156
 $
 $
 $9,925
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel$6,654
 $3,308
 $32
 $
 $
 $
 $9,994
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel2,200
 1,215
 8
 
 
 
 3,423
Rising Star Casino Resort1,291
 2,714
 
 
 
 
 4,005
277
 2,645
 9
 
 
 
 2,931
Northern Nevada Casinos3,016
 781
 80
 
 
 
 3,877
2,900
 746
 295
 
 
 
 3,941
Development/Management












9,690
 7,878
 83
 156
 
 
 17,807
12,031
 7,914
 344
 
 
 
 20,289
Other operations 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Corporate(4,646)
15

(446)


891

343
 (3,843)(5,842) 14
 
 
 1,314
 409
 (4,105)
(4,646) 15
 (446) 
 891
 343
 (3,843)(5,842) 14
 
 
 1,314
 409
 (4,105)
$5,044
 $7,893
 $(363) $156
 $891
 $343
 $13,964
$6,189
 $7,928
 $344
 $
 $1,314
 $409
 $16,184
 

39




For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 (In thousands)For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 (In thousands)
Operating
income (loss)
 
Depreciation
and
amortization
 Impairments Write-offs, recoveries and asset disposals 
Board and
executive
transition costs
 
Project
development
and acquisition
costs
 
Stock
compensation
 
Adjusted
EBITDA
Operating
income (loss)
 
Depreciation
and
amortization
 Write-offs, recoveries and asset disposals Pre-Opening 
Project
development
and acquisition
costs
 
Stock
compensation
 
Adjusted
EBITDA
Casino properties                            
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel$2,189
 $5,312
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $7,501
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel$5,383
 $4,383
 $3
 $156
 $
 $
 $9,925
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rising Star Casino Resort(12,742) 2,997
 11,547
 372
 
 
 
 2,174
1,291
 2,714
 
 
 
 
 4,005
Northern Nevada Casinos3,609
 857
 
   
 
 
 4,466
3,016
 781
 80
 
 
 
 3,877
Development/Management1,066
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,066
(5,878) 9,166

11,547
 372
 
 
 
 15,207
9,690
 7,878

83
 156
 
 
 17,807
Other operations 
  
    
  
  
  
  
 
  
    
  
  
  
Board and executive transition costs(2,741) 
 
 
 2,741
 
 
 
Corporate(5,219) 17
 
 152
 
 296
 248
 (4,506)(4,646) 15
 (446) 
 891
 343
 (3,843)
(7,960) 17
 
 152
 2,741
 296
 248
 (4,506)(4,646) 15
 (446) 
 891
 343
 (3,843)
$(13,838)
$9,183

$11,547
 $524

$2,741

$296

$248

$10,701
$5,044

$7,893

$(363) $156

$891

$343

$13,964
 
TheOperating expenses deducted to arrive at operating income (loss) in the above tables include facility rents related to: (i) Silver Slipper information presented above is net of rent paid on its underlying land lease of$1.3 million in 2016 and $1.2 million in 2015, and $1(ii) Northern Nevada segment of $1.9 million in 2014.  Likewise, the Northern Nevada figures are net of2016 and $1.5 million of rent paid for the casino space at Grand Lodge Casino in both 2015 and 2014.  Rising Star Casino Resort paid $0.9 million in 2015, and 2014(iii) Bronco Billy's of $0.2 million from May 13, 2016 through December 31, 2016. Capital lease payments of $0.6 million during 2016 and $0.9 million during 2015 related to rent theRising Star’s hotel that opened in November 2013. Because this hotel lease is a capital lease, those rentare not deducted; such payments are not included in the above numbers but instead appearaccounted for as interest expense and amortization of the capitalized lease obligation and as a component of interest expense.capitalized-lease-related debt.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
 Liquidity OutlookCash Flows

As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had $14.6$27 million of unrestricted cash and equivalents and $3 million of our $5$2 million Revolving Loan under our First Lien Credit Facility was available to draw.undrawn and fully available. Our ability to draw on our Revolving Loan is subject to, amongst other terms, our continued ability to meet our various financial covenants. Management currently estimates that approximately $12 million of cash and cash equivalents is required for the day-to-day operations of the Company.

ExcludingAs discussed in more detail above, our pending acquisitionrights offering closed on November 10, 2016, realizing $5 million of Bronco Billy's, we believegross proceeds ($4.64 million of net proceeds after offering costs). We intend to utilize the net proceeds from the rights offering to partially fund certain capital expenditure growth projects, as well as for general corporate purposes.

Our casinos are our primary sources of income and operating cash flow. There can be no assurance that our existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, and availability under our Revolving Loanbusiness will meet our financial and operating obligations over the next twelve months. However, we will continue to closely monitor and manage our cash position given the current economic environment. Our First Lien and Second Lien Credit Facilities mature on April 1, 2017, and we are currently in the process of refinancing our debt in order to meet our debt service requirements as we are unlikely to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available in amounts sufficient to repayenable us to pay our indebtedness or fund our other liquidity needs. Subject to the principaleffects of the economic uncertainties discussed herein, we believe that adequate financial resources (including from operating cash flows and external debt and equity financing) will be available to fund ongoing operating requirements over the next 12 months, though we may need to refinance or seek additional financing to compete effectively or grow our business. Management is reviewing market conditions and exploring financing or refinancing alternatives. However, there can be no assurances of our ability to obtain any additional financing, to refinance our existing debt, upon the scheduled maturities. Additionally, we believe the refinancing of our debt, which has not yet been finalized, is expected to include an increased facility amount for the Bronco Billy's purchase obligations. This will enable us to fund the Bronco Billy's acquisition and allow us to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, including funding our operations, capital expenditures and debt service requirements. If our sources of capital are inadequateor to fund our long-term liquidity requirements, we will attemptgrowth efforts or to procure additional debt or equity financing. Management believes that, in the current capital markets and given the Company's positive trends, we will be able to refinance our debt on acceptable terms. There is no certainty, however, that we will be successful in doing so, or that we will be able to successfully fund our pending acquisition of Bronco Billy's.

Cash Flowscontinue expanding.

Cash flows - operating activities.On a consolidated basis, cash provided by operations during the year ended December 31, 20152016 was $7.5$7.9 million compared to $7.6$7.5 million in 2014.2015. Trends in our operating cash flows tend to follow trends in operating income, excluding non-cash charges, but can beare also affected by changes in components of working capital accounts such as receivables, prepaid

40



expenses, and payables. Comparing 20152016 to 2014,2015, our operating incomecash flows increased due to the acquisition of Bronco Billy's and we received our federal income tax refunds, while our prepaid expenses increased and payables and accruals decreased.working capital timing differences, partially offset by an increase in interest paid due to higher debt levels.

Cash flows - investing activities.On a consolidated basis, cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 20152016 was $14.8$28.5 million, largely for the construction of the hotel at Silver Slipper and the deposit forwhich primarily related to the acquisition of Bronco Billy's. Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 20142015 was $8.9$14.8 million, which primarily related to the the constructionreflected completion of the hotel and repair of the parking garage at Silver Slipper.



Cash flows - financing activities. On a consolidated basis, cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 20152016 was $33.1 million and was attributed primarily to the $35 million of additional proceeds from the Second Lien Credit Facility and $4.64 million of net rights offering proceeds, partially offset by payments related to the First Lien Credit Facility and debt issuance costs from the refinancing. Cash provided by financing activities for the prior-year period was $6.2 million, andwhich included $8.9 million drawn onfor construction costs related to the First Term Loan for the hotel construction at Silver Slipper partially offset by payments on our $1.5 million First Term Loan, principal repayment made in the fourth quarter, principal debt reduction on our capital lease at Rising Star Casino Resort, and additional loan fees incurred during the year for the First and Second Lien Credit Facility amendments.  Cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2014 was $2.1 million and included $1.1 million drawn for construction costs related to the hotel construction at Silver Slipper and $2 million drawn on our Revolving Loan, partially offset by the principal debt reduction on our capital lease at Rising Star and additional loan fees for the First and Second Lien Credit Facilityfacility amendments.

Other Factors Affecting Liquidity

We have significant outstanding debt and contractual obligations in addition to planned capital expenditures. At December 31, 2015,We expect to meet these obligations and planned capital expenditure requirements primarily through future anticipated operating cash flows, cash and equivalents and available borrowings under our Revolving Loan. We also intend to refinance our existing debt facilities prior to their maturity. However, our operations are subject to financial, economic, competitive, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. If we had $6 millionare unable to generate sufficient operating cash flow and/or the capital markets do not facilitate the refinancing of our debt, maturing inwe could be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing, delaying, or eliminating certain planned capital expenditures, selling assets, or obtaining additional equity financing.
Long-term Debt. On May 13, 2016, we entered into an amended and $42 million of debt maturing in April 2017 under ourrestated First Lien Credit Facility with Capital One which includes a First Term Loan of $45 million and Revolving Loan of $2 million, and an amended and restated Second Lien Credit Facility with ABC Funding, LLC, which included a term loan facility increase from $20 million to $55 million, of which the additional proceeds of $35 million were primarily used to complete our acquisition of Bronco Billy's. 

Our First Lien Credit Facility matures in May 2019 and includes quarterly principal payments of $1.5 million.$562,500 until May 2018 and $843,750 thereafter through maturity. Our Second Lien Credit Facility has no quarterly principal payment requirements butand matures in April 2017.November 2019. We expect to meet oura pay an estimated $10 million of cash interest payments, based on current outstanding debt maturities and planned capital expenditure requirements primarily throughapplicable interest rates, within the refinancingnext 12 months.

Common Stock Warrants. As part of our First andthe Second Lien Credit Facilities, future anticipated operatingFacility, on May 13, 2016, the Company granted the second lien lenders warrants representing 5% of the outstanding common equity of the Company, as determined on a fully-diluted basis. The warrants include redemption rights which allow the second lien lenders, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the warrants under certain conditions. Should the redemption rights be exercised, the repurchase value will be equal to the 21-day average price of the Company's stock, less the warrant exercise price, and will be payable by the Company in cash flowsor through the issuance of an unsecured note with a four-year term, a minimum interest rate of 13.25%, and casha guarantee by the Company's subsidiaries. Alternatively, the second lien lenders may choose to have the Company register and cash equivalents, and available borrowings under our First Lien Credit Facility.sell the shares related to the warrants through a public stock offering.

Hyatt Option to Purchase our Leasehold Interest and Related Assets. Our lease with Hyatt Equities, L.L.C. ("Hyatt") to operate the Grand Lodge Casino contains an option for Hyatt, beginning on January 1, 2019, to purchase our leasehold interest and related operating assets of the Grand Lodge Casino subject to assumption of applicable liabilities. The option price is an amount equal to the Grand Lodge Casino’s positive working capital, plus Grand Lodge Casino’s earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for the 12-month period preceding the acquisition (or pro-rated if less than 12 months remain on the lease), plus the fair market value of the Grand Lodge Casino’s personal property. Additionally, monthly rent will increase from $125,000 to (i) $145,833 commencing on the later of January 1, 2017 or when Hyatt completes its renovation (but no later than June 30, 2017), and (ii) $166,667 commencing on January 1, 2018 through maturity.

Capital Investments. We made significant capital investments during the year ended December 31, 2016. We expect to make the following additional capital investments during 2016:2017 and beyond as discussed below. The Company intends to utilize existing cash and equivalents, cash flow from operations, and if necessary, availability under its Revolving Loan to finance the capital investments.

Bronco Billy's Pending AcquisitionRising Star Casino Resort - Approximately$27.5 million for the remainderWe plan to make significant improvements at Rising Star, including (i) refurbishment of a portion of the $30 million acquisitioncasino to include a VIP room and sense-of-arrival improvements; (ii) implementation of a ferry boat service to Kentucky; (iii) construction of an RV park; (iv) construction of a restaurant on the riverboat; and (v) renovation of approximately 71 of the hotel's guest rooms that had not been refurbished under an earlier refurbishment program. On July 13, 2016, we received a conditional use permit from the Boone County Board of Adjustment for a ferry landing on land that the Company has purchased in Rabbit Hash, Kentucky. We intend to operate a 10-vehicle ferry boat to significantly shorten the distance for customers traveling from Kentucky to Rising Star. Commencement of ferry boat operations


remains subject to additional approvals, including from the Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Coast Guard. We anticipate the total cost of Bronco Billy's, which we intendthe improvements at Rising Star will be approximately $6 million, including $4 million expected to finance in connection with the refinancing of our outstanding First and Second Lien Credit Facilities.be funded during 2017.

Grand Lodge Casino - Under the terms of the lease amendment effective November 25, 2015, in consultation with Hyatt, we will purchase new gaming devices and equipment or make other capital expenditures at our sole cost and expense upof approximately $1.5 million, which is being invested alongside approximately $3.5 million of enhancements being funded by our landlord. The Company and the landlord are working together on that refurbishment, which began in February 2017 and is expected to be complete in June 2017. The refurbishment is being conducted in phases, thus allowing the casino to remain open during the refurbishment.

Stockman's Casino - During the third quarter of 2016, we began construction on a number of exterior improvements to the property including access to the casino through construction of a new parking lot, and making certain other enhancements at a budgeted cost of $1.5 million. We currently expect to fundThe parking lot and a portionnew digital marquee sign were completed during the fourth quarter of the $1.5 million2016. Landscaping improvements, a new porte cochère, and a new administrative office building are slated for completion during 2016 from working capital, with the remainder being invested in 2017.

Rising Star Casino ResortSilver Slipper - The amendment to the capital lease agreement on March 16, 2016 requires us to investWe anticipate building a minimumswimming pool and beach complex, new casino restaurant, and outdoor event space in 2017 at a cost of $1 million in capital expenditures to the Rising Star Casino Resort by March 31, 2017. These improvements may include, but are not limited to, (i) re-branding and re-naming the steakhouse; (ii) renovating the lower level of the boat to add a new restaurant concept; and (iii) implementation of a ferry boat service to Kentucky. We currently expect to fund a significant portion of the $1 million during 2016 from working capital.approximately $0.8 million.

Additionally, we may fund other various capital expenditure projects, during 2016 which are dependentdepending on our financial resources. Our capital expenditures may fluctuate depending ondue to our decisions with respect to strategic capital investments in new or existing facilities, and the timing of capital investments to maintain the quality of our properties.

American Place Proposal

In August 2015, we responded to a "request for proposal" (RFP) by the Indianapolis Airport Authority ("Airport Authority") with a proposal for a $650 million lifestyle complex, anchored by a modest-sized casino, known as "American Place". Under No assurance can be given that any of our proposal, we would act as the "master developer" (as such term is used in the RFP) of the project and plan to seek partners for many of its aspects. The project is contingent, amongst other things, on being selected by the Airport Authority, on changes in the state gaming laws and other regulatory approvals that would allow the relocation to Indianapolis of approximately half of the gaming devices that are licensed to operate in Rising Sun, Indiana, and on obtaining financing for the proposed project. There is no certainty that our proposalplanned capital expenditure projects will be selectedcompleted or if selected, that the proposed project will become a reality. We are aware of at least one other proposal which includes a sports medical complex and a 20,000-seat sports stadium. In March 2016, the Airport Authority indicated that it was canceling the RFP process, but intends to continue to seek development of the site in a manner that would be beneficial to Indianapolis and the state of Indiana.

41



Subject to the effects of the economic uncertainties discussed above, we believe that adequate financial resourcesany completed projects will be available to execute our current growth plan from a combination of operating cash flows and external debt and equity financing. However, there can be no assurances of our ability to continue expanding.successful.

We evaluate projects on a number of factors, including forecasted profitability forecasts, length of the development period, the regulatory and political environment, and the ability to secure the funding necessary to complete the development or acquisition, among other considerations. No assurance can be given that any additional projects will be pursued or completed or that any completed projects will be successful.

Credit Facilities

Our debt consists primarily of the  The First and Second Lien Credit Facilities that are secured by substantially all of our assets. Ourassets and our wholly-owned subsidiaries guarantee our obligationobligations under the agreements, except for the subsidiary FHR-Colorado LLC, which was formed to acquire Bronco Billy's.  The First Lien Credit Facility is a $56.3 million loan facility, including a $10 million construction term loan to fund a portion of the cost to build the hotel at Silver Slipper (together, the "First Term Loan") and a $5 million Revolving Loan. On March 11, 2016, the maturity date of the First Lien Credit Facility was extended to April 1, 2017.

At December 31, 2015, we had $48 million of principal indebtedness outstanding for the First Lien Credit Facility. We also had the remaining $569,000 drawn from the construction portion of the term loan in a trust account that we intend to use to resolve the final construction costs of the new hotel. On October 1, 2015, we made a $1.5 million principal payment on the First Term Loan in accordance with the amended terms.

As of December 31, 2015, we had principal obligations of $20 million for the Second Lien Credit Facility which matures April 1, 2017.agreements.  The Second Lien Credit Facility is subordinate to the lien of the First Lien Credit Facility.

Effective May 31, 2015, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to First Lien Credit Facility which amended certain provisions of the First Lien Credit Agreement as follows: (i) extended the period for draws against the $10 million term loan associated with the hotel construction at Silver Slipper to August 31, 2015, and (ii) extended the date that the first payment is due for this term loan to October 1, 2015.

As discussed in "Note 6 - Long-Term Debt", on August 5, 2015 and effective as of June 30, 2015, we entered into the Fifth Amendment toDecember 31, 2016, the First Lien Credit Facility had $43.3 million of gross principal indebtedness outstanding on our First Term Loan and Amendment No. 4 to the Second Lien Credit Facility. These amendments included the following:$2 million Revolving Loan was undrawn and fully available.

The First Lien 5th Amendment:

Extended the maturity date to October 1, 2016;
Modified the definition of Adjusted EBITDA to allow the addition of up to $300,000 in pre-opening and development expenses related to the construction of the hotel at Silver Slipper;
Modified the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio to exclude up to $9,100,000 in non-financed Capital Expenditures incurred to construct the hotel at Silver Slipper;
Modified certain other financial covenants; and
Adjusted the Total Leverage Ratio and First Lien Leverage Ratio covenants to accommodate the delayed opening of the hotel at Silver Slipper.

Amendment No. 4 to the Second Lien Credit Facility:

Modified the definition of Adjusted EBITDA to allow the addition of up to $300,000 in preopening and development expenses related to the construction of the hotel at Silver Slipper;
Modified the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio to exclude up to $9,100,000 in non-financed Capital Expenditures incurred to construct the hotel at Silver Slipper;
Modified certain other financial covenants;
Adjusted the Total Leverage Ratio and First Lien Leverage Ratio covenants to accommodate the delayed opening of the hotel at Silver Slipper;
Created a variable interest rate through a pricing grid based on the Company’s Total Leverage Ratio. For a Total Leverage Ratio below 6.25 to 1.00, the interest rate can vary between a minimum of 13.25% to 14.25%. If the Company’s Total Leverage Ratio is at or above 6.25 to 1.00, the Company may, at its option, pay interest (i) solely in cash at the maximum rate of 14.75%, or (ii) partially in cash at 14.25% and “in kind” at 1% by capitalizing the interest and adding the capitalized interest to the principal of the Term Loans; and

42



Amended the prepayment premium to the following amounts:    
Prior to October 1, 2015, 2% of the aggregate principal amount prepaid;
On or after October 1, 2015 and before January 1, 2016, 1% of the aggregate principal amount prepaid;
On or after January 1, 2016, and before April 1, 2016, 0.50% of the aggregate principal amount prepaid; and
On or after April 1, 2016, no prepayment premium applies.

We have elected to pay interest on the First Lien Credit Facility based on the greater of the elected London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate(as defined) or 1.0%, plus a margin rate. LIBOR rate elections canof 3.75%. The margin rate of 3.75% will be made based on a 30-day, 60-day, 90-dayincreased by 50 basis points beginning in May 2017. There is no prepayment premium or 180-day LIBOR, and margins are adjusted quarterly. interest rate cap associated with this facility.

Second Lien Credit Facility

As of December 31, 2015,2016, the interest rate was 4.75% on the balance outstanding on the FirstSecond Lien Credit Facility basedhad $55 million of gross principal indebtedness outstanding. Interest is currently payable monthly at 13.5% (and may vary at a rate between 12.5% and 13.5% depending on the 1.0% minimum plus a 3.75% margin. In accordance with the termstotal leverage of the First Lien Credit Facility, we maintain a prepaid interest rate cap for a notionalCompany), and there are no quarterly principal payment requirements, as all principal is due at maturity. The prepayment premium is 3% of the total principal amount of $14.75 million at a LIBOR cap rate of 1.5%, which terminates on June 29, 2016.until May 13, 2017, 2% until May 13, 2018, 1% until May 13, 2019, and no prepayment premium thereafter.

Covenants

The First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities contain customary negative covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to: incur indebtedness; grant liens; pay dividends and make other restricted payments; make investments; make fundamental changes; dispose of assets; and change the nature of our business. The First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit Facility require that weWe are also required to maintain specified financial covenants, including a total leverage ratio, a first lien leverage ratio, and a fixed chargefixed-charge coverage ratio, all of which measure Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the agreements)


against outstanding debt and fixed charges (as defined in the agreements). AWe are also required to make capital expenditure ratio must also be maintained which requires we investexpenditures of at least 1.5%1.425%, and no more than 5%5.25%, of our prior-year revenues, excluding costs related torevenues. The cap does not include capital expenditures made from the Silver Slipper hotel project. issuance of equity securities, including the recent rights offering.

The First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities currently define Adjusted EBITDA as, for any four fiscal quarter period, (a) net income (loss) for such period, plus, (a)(b) to the extent deducted in determining net income (loss) for such period: (i) interest expense, (b)(ii) provisions for income taxes, and (c)(iii) depreciation and amortization and further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that are either non-cash items or are not indicative of ongoing operating performance such as (d)expenses, (iv) extraordinary gains and losses (including non-cash impairment charges), (e) non-cash(v) stock compensation expense, (f) certain(vi) acquisition costs, including the Company’s canceled acquisition of the Fitz Tunica Casino & Hotel (g) costs related to the Company’s canceled S-1 registration statement filedBronco Billy's in early 2014, (h) board and management transitionan aggregate amount not to exceed $1,000,000, (vii) pre-opening expenses from the changes enacted in 2014 (i) preopening and development costs for the construction ofrelated to the hotel at Silver Slipper that opened in 2015, and (j)(viii) non-recurring development expenses for new initiatives in an aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000 for the trailing four consecutive fiscal quarters, minus (c) extraordinary gains, and minus (d) joint venture net income, unless such net income has been actually been received by the Company in the form of cash dividends or distributions. For purposes of our covenants, we also received pro forma creditAdjusted EBITDA shall include results for gaming tax reductions implemented in Indiana in 2014 andBronco Billy's as if it were owned for the first quarter of 2015.entire measurement period.

The revised financial covenant ratios, as detailed in the First Lien 5th Amendment and Amendment No. 4 to the Second Lien Credit Facility, are statedFacilities' restrictive covenants include a maximum total leverage ratio, a maximum first lien leverage ratio, and a fixed-charge coverage ratio. For further information, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements set forth in the tables below:

First Lien Credit Facility
Applicable Period
Maximum
Total Leverage
Ratio
Maximum
First Lien Leverage Ratio
Minimum
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
June 30, 2015 through and including September 29, 20156.85x4.85x1.10x
September 30, 2015 through and including December 30, 20156.75x4.75x1.10x
December 31, 2015 through and including March 30, 20166.35x4.35x1.10x
March 31, 2016 through and including June 29, 20166.15x4.15x1.10x
June 30, 2016 through and including September 29, 20165.85x4.00x1.10x
September 30, 2016 and thereafter5.50x3.75x1.10x


43



Second Lien Credit Facility
Applicable Period
Maximum
Total Leverage
Ratio
Maximum
First Lien Leverage Ratio
Minimum
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
June 30, 2015 through and including September 29, 20157.10x5.10x1.00x
September 30, 2015 through and including December 30, 20157.00x5.00x1.00x
December 31, 2015 through and including March 30, 20166.60x4.60x1.00x
March 31, 2016 through and including June 29, 20166.40x4.40x1.00x
June 30, 2016 through and including September 29, 20166.10x4.25x1.00x
September 30, 2016 and thereafter5.75x4.00x1.00x
“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

We were in compliance with our covenants as amended, as of December 31, 2015. There2016; however, there can be no assurances that we will remain in compliance with all covenants in all future periods or that, if there is a breach, lenders will waive such breach.

the future. The First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities also include other customary events of default, including, among other things: non-payment; breach of covenant; breach of representation or warranty; cross-default under certain other indebtedness or guarantees; commencement of insolvency proceedings; inability to pay debts; entry of certain material judgments against us or our subsidiaries; occurrence of certain ERISA events; limitations onrepurchase of our ability to re-purchase shares or pay dividends;own stock and certain changes of control. A breach of a covenant or other events of default could cause the loans to be immediately due and payable, terminate commitments for additional loan funds, or the lenders could exercise any other remedy available under the First Lien Credit Facility orand Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities or by law.  If a breach of covenants or other event of default were to occur, we would seek modifications to covenants or a temporary waiver or waivers from the First and Second Lien Credit Facilities lenders. No assurance can be given that we would be successful in obtaining such waivers or modifications.

We are required to make prepayments under the First Lien Credit Facility, under certain conditions as defined in the agreement, in addition to the scheduled principal installments as defined. With regards to the Second Lien Credit Facility, no mandatory prepayments are required prior to the discharge of the First Lien Credit Facility.

The summary of principal terms of the amended and the amendments to therestated First Lien Credit Facility and to theamended and restated Second Lien Credit Facility in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are in all cases subject to the terms of the actual credit agreements and amendments, copies of which are referenced as Exhibits in Part IV to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
 
Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).America. Certain of our accounting policies require that we apply significant judgment in defining the appropriate assumptions for calculating estimates that affect reported amounts and disclosures. By their nature, judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty, and therefore actual results may differ from our estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets, Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles
 
Our long-lived assets include property and equipment, goodwill, and indefinite-lived intangibles and are evaluated at least annually (and more frequently when circumstances warrant) to determine if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  Examples of such events or changes in circumstances that might indicate impairment testing is warranted might include, as applicable, an adverse change in the legal, regulatory or business climate relative to gaming nationally or in the jurisdictions in which we operate, or a significant long-term decline in historical or forecasted earnings or cash


flows or the fair value of our property or business, possibly as a result of competitive or other economic or political factors. In evaluating whether a loss in value is other than temporary, we consider: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value or market value has been less than cost; (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the casino property, including

44



any specific events which may influence the operations; (3) our intent related to the asset and ability to retain it for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value; (4) the condition and trend of the economic cycle; (5) historical and forecasted financial performance; and (6) trends in the general market.

We review the carrying value of our property and equipment used in our operations whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then an impairment is recorded based on the fair value of the asset. Fair value is typically measured using a discounted cash flow model whereby future cash flows are discounted using a weighted-average cost of capital, developed using a standard capital assetcapital-asset pricing model, based on guideline companies in our industry. 

We test our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually during the fourth quarter or when a triggering event occurs and evaluate goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets using an income approach to value applying a typical discounted cash flows methodology. In determining whether the carrying value of long-lived assets is less than its estimated fair value, a discounted cash flow approach to value is used and is based on Level 3 inputs as defined by GAAP. The Company’s valuation model incorporates a discount rate considering specific transactions and/or an estimated weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value multiples that are used by market participants.  We also consider the metrics of specific business transactions that may be comparable to varying degrees. The weight assigned to these approaches to value in our impairment evaluation may vary from period to period depending upon evolving events. Forecasted prospective financial information used in the model is based on management’s expected course of action. Sensitivity analyses are also performed related to key assumptions used, including possible variations in the weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value multiples, among others. Any impairment charges incurred are not reversed if a subsequent evaluation concludes in a higher valuation than the carrying value.
 
Fixed Asset Capitalization and Depreciation Policies
 
We define a fixed asset as a unit of property that (a) has an economic useful life that extends beyond 12 months and (b) was acquired or produced for a cost greater than $2,500 for a single asset or greater than $5,000 for a group of assets, including interestassets. Property and equipment are stated at cost. For the majority of our property and equipment, cost was determined at the acquisition date based on estimated fair values in connection with the May 2016 Bronco Billy's acquisition, the October 2012 Silver Slipper acquisition, the April 2011 Rising Star acquisition and the January 2007 Stockman's acquisition. Project development costs, associated with long-term development projects calculated using our weighted average ratewhich are amounts expended on the pursuit of borrowing.
new business opportunities, and acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred. Maintenance and repairs that neither materially add to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong its life are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are computed using theprovided on a straight-line methodbasis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. When we construct assets, or the termwe capitalize direct costs of the lease, whicheverproject, including fees paid to architects and contractors and property taxes. Salaries are capitalized only for employees working directly on the project. In addition, interest cost associated with major development and construction projects is appropriate undercapitalized as part of the circumstances.cost of the project. Interest is typically capitalized on amounts expended on the project using the weighted-average cost of our outstanding borrowings. Capitalization of interest starts when construction activities begin and ceases when construction is substantially complete or development activity is suspended for more than a brief period.

We must make estimates and assumptions when accounting for capital expenditures. Whether an expenditure is considered a maintenance expense or a capital asset is a matter of judgment. When constructing or purchasing assets, we must determine whether existing assets are being replaced or otherwise impaired, which also may be a matter of judgment. In addition, our depreciation expense is highly dependent on the assumptions we make about our assets’ estimated useful lives. We determine the estimated useful lives based on our experience with similar assets, engineering studies, and common industry practice.our estimate of the usage of the asset. Whenever events or circumstances occur which change the estimated useful life of an asset, we account for the change prospectively.
 
Goodwill and Business Combinations
 
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over fair value of net tangible and other intangible assets acquired in connection with business combinations.  We accounted for our acquisition of casino properties, most recently theBronco Billy's Casino and Hotel, Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel and Rising Star Casino Resort, as business combinations. In a business combination, we determine the fair value of acquired assets, including identifiable intangible assets, assumed liabilities, and non-controlling interests, if any. The fair value of the acquired business is allocated to the acquired assets, assumed liabilities, and non-controlling interests based on their fair value, with any remaining fair value allocated to goodwill. This allocation process requires use of estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows to be generated by the acquired assets.



Intangible Assets
 
Our indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily include the cost of gaming licenses and trademarks.trade names. Gaming licenses represent the rights to conduct gaming in certain jurisdictions.jurisdictions and trade names represent the fair value of the casino name's brand recognition. The value of the Rising Star Casino Resortour gaming license waslicenses were primarily estimated using a derivation of the income approach to valuation. The value of certain trademarks is basedthe Bronco Billy's trade names utilized the "relief from royalty" method which primarily on legal and recording feesutilizes comparable royalty agreements to obtain such marks.determine value. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized unless it is determined that their useful life is no longer indefinite. We periodically review our indefinite-lived assets to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.  If it is determined that an indefinite-lived intangible asset has a finite useful life, then the asset is tested for impairment and is subsequently accounted for as a finite-lived intangible asset.
 
Our finite-lived intangible assets include customer relationship and loyalty programs, land leases and water rights. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the shorter of their contractual or economic useful lives.
 

45



Customer loyalty programs represent the value of repeat business associated with the casinos’ loyalty programs when we acquired the properties. Such values were determined using a derivation of the income approach to valuation.  The valuation analyses for the active-rated players were based on estimated revenues and attrition rates. The Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel and Rising Star Casino Resort maintain historical information for the proportion of revenues attributable to the rated play.  The value of the customer loyalty programs are amortized over three years, their assumed economic useful life.  
 
Revenue Recognition and Promotional Allowances
 
Our revenue recognition policies follow casino industry practices. Casino revenue is the aggregate net difference between gaming wins and losses, with certain liabilities recognized including progressive jackpots, earned customer loyalty incentives, funds deposited by customers before gaming play occurs, and for certain chips and tokens in the customers’ possession. Key performance indicators related to gaming revenue are slot coin-in and table game drop (volume indicators) and “win” or “hold” percentage.
 
Hotel rooms, food, beverages and other services provided by us on a complimentary basis are recorded at estimated retail value, then subtracted as promotional allowances (a contra-revenue item) to calculate net revenues. The actual estimated cost of providing such goods and services is then charged as a casino operating expense.
 
Hotel, food and beverage, entertainment and other operating revenues are recognized as these services are performed.  Advance deposits on rooms and advance ticket sales are recorded as deferred revenue until services are provided to the customer without regard to whether they are refundable. Sales and similar revenue-linked taxes (except for gaming taxes) collected from customers on behalf of, and submitted to, taxing authorities are also excluded from revenue and recorded as a current liability.
 
Customer Loyalty Programs
 
We have customer loyalty programs at each of our properties – the Silver Slipper Casino Players Club, theBronco Billy’s MVP “Most Valuable Players” Club, Rising Star Rewards Club™, the Grand Lodge Players Advantage Club® and the Stockman’s Winner’s Club.  Under these programs, customers earn points based on their volume of wagering that may be redeemed for various benefits, such as free play, cash back, complimentary dining, or hotel stays, among others, depending on each property’s specific offers. We also occasionally offer sweepstakes and other promotions for tracked customers that do not require redemption of points.  The cost of points redeemed for cash is recorded as a reduction of gaming revenue, and the cost of points redeemed for complimentary goods or services is recorded as an operating expense of the gaming department. Unredeemed points are forfeited if the customer becomes and remains inactive for a specified period of time.
 
Loyalty programs are a part of the total marketing program. The amount of marketing reinvestment (complimentaries to players, promotional awards, entertainment, etc.) is based on the specific property and competitive assumptions.  We track the percentage of promotional and marketing costs compared to gaming revenue for an efficient use and return on our marketing investment.  Each of ourOur properties has been faced with a highly competitiveare in highly-competitive promotional environmentenvironments due to the high amounts of incentives offered by theour competition.



Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable consist primarily of casino, hotel and other receivables, are typically non-interest bearing, and are carried net of an appropriate collection allowance to approximate fair value. The collections allowance isallowances for doubtful accounts are estimated based on specific review of customer accounts as well as historical collection experience and current economic and business conditions.  Accounts are written off when management deems the account to be uncollectible and recoveries of accounts previously written off are recorded when received. 

Income Taxes

We are subject to federal and state taxes in the United States. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We make these estimates and judgments about our future taxable income that are based on assumptions that are consistent with our future plans. Tax laws, regulations, and administrative practices may be subject to change due to economic or political conditions including fundamental changes to the applicable tax laws. As of December 31, 2016, we had recorded a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets because we determined that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will not be realized in the foreseeable future. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, the amount of our valuation allowance could be materially impacted.

Our income tax returns are subject to examination by the IRS and other tax authorities. Positions taken in tax returns are sometimes subject to uncertainty in the tax laws and may not ultimately be accepted by the IRS or other tax authorities.  We assess our tax positions using a two-step process. A tax position is recognized if it meets a “more likely than not” threshold. It is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized.  Additionally, we recognize accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Share-based Compensation
 
We have granted shares of both restricted common stock and stock options to key members of management and the board of directors.  Accounting standards require us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognize that cost over the service period.  Share-based compensation expense from stock awards is included in general and administrative expense. Vesting is contingent upon certain conditions, including continuous service of the individual recipients.  We use the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the estimated fair value for each option grant issued. The Black-Scholes-determined fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, is amortized as compensation cost on a straight line basis over the service period.
 

46




Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets when it is deemed more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized within a reasonable time period.
Our income tax returns are subject to examination by the IRS and other tax authorities. Positions taken in tax returns are sometimes subject to uncertainty in the tax laws and may not ultimately be accepted by the IRS or other tax authorities.  We assess our tax positions using a two-step process. A tax position is recognized if it meets a “more likely than not” threshold. It is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized.  Additionally, we recognize accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
 
We have reviewed authoritative standardsIn February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” (“ASU 2016-02”), which replaces the existing guidance in ASC 840, Leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 31,15, 2018. ASU 2016-02 requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee would account for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition model, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 has been amended by ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-11 and ASU 2016-12, which the FASB issued in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016, May 2016 and others not yet effective.May 2016, respectively. ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including gaming industry specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 also provides a five-step analysis in determining how and when the revenue is recognized. ASU 2014-09 will require revenue recognition to represent the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. Revenues are defined as inflows or other enhancements of assets of an entity or settlements of its liabilities (or a combination of both) from delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or other activities that constitute the entity’s ongoing major or central operations. As a result, we determinedrevenues will be presented net of the retail value of goods and services provided to customers on a complimentary basis.The effective date for the amended ASU 2014-09 is for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company does not plan to early adopt and is currently evaluating the newimplementation


approach to be used which will assist with the analysis and disclosure of the effect of the adoption of the amended ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements.

Management believes that there are no other recently issued accounting standards not yet effective that are not likely to have any significanta material impact on our future financial statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
As a "smallersmaller reporting company",company, as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities and Exchange Commission,Act, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
 

47





Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 
 Page
 

48




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
Board of Directors
Full House Resorts, Inc.
Las Vegas, NVNevada
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Full House Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
 
/s/ Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern
 
Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern
Certified Public Accountants
Las Vegas, Nevada
 
March 29, 201617, 2017
 


49




FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except number of shares and per share data)
 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Revenues      
Casino$111,920
 $109,566
$131,584
 $111,763
Food and beverage25,222
 20,083
28,797
 25,222
Hotel6,675
 5,002
8,637
 6,675
Management fees
 1,066
Other operations3,811
 3,535
4,394
 3,811
Gross revenues147,628
 139,252
173,412
 147,471
Less promotional allowances(23,040) (17,831)(27,420) (23,040)
Net revenues124,588
 121,421
145,992
 124,431
Operating expenses 
  
 
  
Casino57,157
 56,867
68,127
 57,157
Food and beverage8,992
 8,315
9,804
 8,992
Hotel1,243
 713
969
 1,243
Other operations1,325
 1,246
1,561
 1,325
Project development and acquisition costs891
 296
1,314
 891
Board and executive transition costs
 2,741
Selling, general and administrative42,040
 43,979
49,756
 41,883
Depreciation and amortization7,893
 9,183
7,928
 7,893
Loss on disposal of assets, net3
 372
344
 3
Impairments
 11,547
119,544
 135,259
139,803
 119,387
Operating income (loss)5,044
 (13,838)
Operating income6,189
 5,044
Other expense, net 
  
 
  
Interest expense, net of $0.4 million capitalized during 2015 and 2014(6,715) (6,272)
Settlement loss
 (1,700)
Other12
 (23)
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized of $0.4 million in 2015(9,486) (6,715)
Debt modification costs(624) 
Adjustment to fair value of stock warrants and other(543) 12
(6,703) (7,995)(10,653) (6,703)
Loss before income taxes
(1,659) (21,833)(4,464) (1,659)
Income tax benefit(342) (988)
Income tax expense (benefit)630
 (342)
Net loss$(1,317) $(20,845)$(5,094) $(1,317)
   
   
Basic and diluted loss per share$(0.07) $(1.10)$(0.26) $(0.07)
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding18,937,812
 18,874,472
19,601,842
 19,607,937
      
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 



50




FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except shares)
December 31,December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash and equivalents$14,574
 $15,639
$27,038
 $14,574
Restricted cash569
 

 569
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $121 and $5131,380
 1,573
Income tax and other receivables334
 3,095
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $53 and $1211,909
 1,714
Inventories1,125
 728
1,329
 1,125
Prepaid expenses2,800
 2,105
2,809
 2,800
Acquisition deposit2,500
 

 2,500
23,282
 23,140
33,085
 23,282
Property and equipment, net98,982
 95,040
111,465
 98,982
 
  
 
  
Goodwill16,480
 16,480
21,286
 16,480
Intangible assets, net2,127
 3,382
10,966
 2,127
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $5,442 and $3,8271,426
 2,650
Deposits473
 178
404
 541
Deferred tax asset
 74
42
 55
20,506
 22,764
32,698
 19,203
$142,770
 $140,944
$177,248
 $141,467
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
  
 
  
Current liabilities 
  
 
  
Accounts payable$3,703
 $4,102
$4,910
 $4,272
Construction contracts payable569
 1,638
Accrued payroll and related1,773
 3,743
3,126
 1,773
Other accrued expenses4,756
 5,413
7,996
 4,756
Current portion of long-term debt6,000
 1,337
1,688
 6,000
Current portion of capital lease obligation665
 690
419
 665
Deferred tax liability
 901
723
 981
17,466
 17,824
18,862
 18,447
   
Common stock warrant liability1,117
 
Long-term debt, net of current portion62,000
 59,294
94,246
 60,642
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion5,505
 6,230
5,318
 5,505
Deferred tax liability1,276
 99
1,226
 350
86,247
 83,447
120,769
 84,944
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

 

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 8 and 12)

 

Stockholders’ equity 
  
 
  
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 20,325,991 and 20,233,276 shares issued; 18,969,396 and 18,876,681 shares outstanding2
 2
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 24,221,558 and 20,325,991shares issued; 22,864,963 and 18,969,396 shares outstanding2
 2
Additional paid-in capital46,221
 45,878
51,271
 46,221
Treasury stock, 1,356,595 common shares(1,654) (1,654)(1,654) (1,654)
Retained earnings11,954
 13,271
6,860
 11,954
56,523
 57,497
56,479
 56,523
$142,770
 $140,944
$177,248
 $141,467
 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

51





FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152016 and 20142015
(In thousands)
Common stock 
Additional
paid-in
 Treasury stock Retained 
Total
Stockholders’
Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Treasury Stock 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
December 31, 2015Shares Dollars capital Shares Dollars Earnings Equity
December 31, 2016Shares Dollars 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Shares Dollars 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Beginning balances20,233
 $2
 $45,878
 1,357
 $(1,654) $13,271
 $57,497
20,326
 $2
 1,357
 $(1,654) 
Stock based compensation
 
 203
 
 
 
 203
Issuances of restricted common stock93
 
 140
 
 
 
 140
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs3,846
 
 4,641
 
 
 
 4,641
Share-based compensation49
 
 409
 
 
 
 409
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 (1,317) (1,317)
 
 
 
 
 (5,094) (5,094)
Ending balances20,326
 $2
 $46,221
 1,357
 $(1,654) $11,954
 $56,523
24,221
 $2
 $51,271
 1,357
 $(1,654) $6,860
 $56,479
 
 Common stock 
Additional
paid-in
 Treasury stock Retained 
Total
Stockholders’
December 31, 2014Shares Dollars capital Shares Dollars Earnings Equity
Beginning balances20,107
 $2
 $45,350
 1,357
 $(1,654) $34,116
 $77,814
Issuance of share based compensation120
 
 
 
 
 
 
Previously deferred share-based compensation recognized
 
 229
 
 
 
 229
Immediate vesting of deferred-based compensation recognized
 
 280
 
 
 
 280
Stock based compensation
 
 10
 
 
 
 10
Issuances of common stock6
 
 9
 
 
 
 9
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 (20,845) (20,845)
Ending balances20,233
 $2
 $45,878
 1,357
 $(1,654) $13,271
 $57,497
 Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Treasury Stock 
Retained
Earnings
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
December 31, 2015Shares Dollars  Shares Dollars  
Beginning balances20,233
 $2
 $45,878
 1,357
 $(1,654) $13,271
 $57,497
Share-based compensation
 
 203
 
 
 
 203
Issuances of restricted common stock93
 
 140
 
 
 
 140
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 (1,317) (1,317)
Ending balances20,326
 $2
 $46,221
 1,357
 $(1,654) $11,954
 $56,523
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.




52




FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss$(1,317) $(20,845)$(5,094) $(1,317)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
 
  
Gaming license impairment
 9,900
Goodwill impairment
 1,647
Depreciation6,387
 7,044
7,897
 6,387
Amortization of debt costs1,615
 1,500
Amortization of customer loyalty program, land lease and water rights1,506
 2,139
Loss on disposals3
 372
Amortization of debt costs and warrants1,088
 1,615
Amortization of customer loyalty programs, land lease and water rights31
 1,506
Change in fair value of stock warrants543
 
Loss on disposals and other write-offs567
 3
Tribal advance collection allowance reduction(500) 

 (500)
Share-based compensation343
 528
409
 343
Increases and decreases in operating assets and liabilities: 
  
 
  
Accounts receivable, net193
 296
(445) 193
Income tax and other receivables3,011
 (1,125)
 3,011
Prepaid expenses, inventories and other(1,008) 2,283
(5) (1,008)
Deferred tax350
 2,068
631
 350
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(3,074) 1,754
2,298
 (3,074)
Net cash provided by operating activities7,509
 7,561
7,920
 7,509
Cash flows from investing activities: 
  
 
  
Acquisition of Bronco Billy's, net of cash acquired(28,369) 
Purchase of property and equipment, net of construction contracts payable(11,354) (9,567)(3,496) (11,354)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets172
 
Restricted cash(569) 
569
 (569)
Proceeds from repayment of tribal advance250
 
250
 250
Deposits and other(3,129) 643
Refunded acquisition deposit and other, net2,364
 (3,129)
Net cash used in investing activities(14,802) (8,924)(28,510) (14,802)
Cash flows from financing activities: 
  
 
  
First Term Loan borrowings8,869
 1,131
First Term Loan repayments(1,500) 
Revolving Loan borrowings, net
 2,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs4,641
 
First Term Loan (repayments) borrowings(2,688) 8,869
Revolving Loan repayments, net(2,000) (1,500)
Second Term Loan borrowings35,000
 
Repayment of long-term debt on capital lease obligation(750) (799)(433) (750)
Debt costs, net of costs payable(391) (266)
Debt costs(1,466) (391)
Net cash provided by financing activities6,228
 2,066
33,054
 6,228
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents(1,065) 703
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents12,464
 (1,065)
Cash and equivalents, beginning of year15,639
 14,936
14,574
 15,639
Cash and equivalents, end of year$14,574
 $15,639
$27,038
 $14,574
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:   
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized$8,187
 $4,846
Cash received from income tax refunds, net$
 $(3,958)
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
  
 Accrued capital expenditures$1,367
 $604
 Issuance of common stock warrants$574
 $
 
 2015 2014
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:   
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized$4,846
 $4,577
Cash received from income tax refunds, net$(3,983) $(2,370)
NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
  
 Accrued capital expenditures$604
 $2,292
See notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

53




FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  ORGANIZATION

Formed as a Delaware corporation in 1987, Full House Resorts, Inc. ("Full House") owns, leases, operates, develops, manages, and/or invests in casinos and related hospitality and entertainment facilities. References in this document to "Full House", the “Company”, “we”, “our,” or “us” refer to Full House Resorts, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where stated or the context otherwise indicates.

We currently own threeand operate four casino properties and operate a fourth casinoGrand Lodge Casino subject to a lease, as follows:space lease. The following identifies the properties along with their dates of acquisition and locations:
Property 
Acquisition
Date
 Location
Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel (owned) 2012 Hancock County, MS (near New Orleans)
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel2016Cripple Creek, CO (near Colorado Springs)
Rising Star Casino Resort (owned) 2011 Rising Sun, IN (near Cincinnati)
Stockman’s Casino (owned) 2007 Fallon, NV (one hour east of Reno)
Grand Lodge Casino (leased and part of the Hyatt Regency Lake Tahoe Resort) 2011 Incline Village, NV (North Shore of Lake Tahoe)

Until our three-year contract expired in September 2014, we also managed the Buffalo Thunder Casino and Resort, Cities of Gold and other gaming facilities, located in Santa Fe, New Mexico, for the Pueblo of Pojoaque.

On September 27, 2015, we, through our newly formed subsidiary FHR-Colorado, LLC, entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the "Bronco Billy's Purchase Agreement") with Pioneer Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Pioneer Group”), to acquire the operating assets and assume certain liabilities of Bronco Billy’s Casino and Hotel (“Bronco Billy’s”) in Cripple Creek, Colorado for a purchase price of $30 million. The acquisition is pending and is expected to be consummated in the second quarter of 2016. See Notes 12 and 15 for further information.

On November 28, 2014, Full House, and Daniel R. Lee, Bradley M. Tirpak and Craig W. Thomas (jointly and severally), the (“Shareholder Group”), entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”), which was subsequently amended on January 28, 2015, resulting in significant changes in the Company’s board of directors and management. The Company incurred significant costs involved with such changes. See Note 9 for further information.

We manage our casinos based on geographic regions within the United States.  Accordingly, Stockman’s Casino and Grand Lodge Casino comprise a Northern Nevada business segment, while Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel, Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel and Rising Star and Silver SlipperCasino Resort are currently distinct segments. We also consider our fee-based casino development and management services as a segment, although none of our current casino properties are managed for others.

2.  BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation and Accounting. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Full House and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior-period amounts in the consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the previously reported income (loss) from operations or net loss.

Except when otherwise required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP)("GAAP"), we measure all of our assets and liabilities on the historical cost basis of accounting.

Use of Estimates. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP.  These principles require the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Significant accounting estimates include, among other items, valuation of goodwill and impairment of other long-lived assets, allocation of the purchase price associated with our acquisitions, collectability of receivables, the estimated useful lives assigned to our depreciable and amortizable assets, contingencies and litigation, estimated cost of services furnished on a complimentary basis to customers and the estimated liability for unredeemed customer loyalty awards, estimated income tax provisions and evaluation of the future realizability of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

54


Fair Value and the Fair Value Input Hierarchy. Fair value measurements affect our accounting for net assets acquired in acquisition transactions, share-based compensation, and certain financial assets and liabilities such as our common stock warrant liability. Our periodic assessments of long-lived tangible and intangible assets for possible impairment, including for property and equipment, goodwill, and other intangible assets, may also be affected by fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and is measured according to a hierarchy that includes: “Level 1” inputs, such as quoted prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities; “Level 2” inputs, which are observable inputs for similar assets; or “Level 3” inputs, which are unobservable inputs.

Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash involved in operations and cash in excess of daily requirements that is invested in highly liquid, short-term investments with initial maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Restricted cash. TheAt December 31, 2015 the Company iswas required to maintain $0.6 million in a segregated construction trust account for proceeds drawn from its construction loan which have not yet been remittedrelated to contractors forthe construction of the hotel at Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel. We estimate the contractors are due $0.6 million at December 31, 2015 and we are holding a like amount in a restricted trust account pending resolutionSlipper. During June 2016, all of the remaining construction costs.proceeds were released to the Company.

Inventories. Inventories consist primarily of food, beverage and retail items, and are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Costs are determined using the first-in, first-out and the weighted average methods.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Fair value measurements affect the Company��s accounting and impairment assessments of its long-lived assets, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition, and goodwill and other intangible assets. Fair value measurements also affect the Company’s accounting for certain of its financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and is measured according to a hierarchy that includes: Level 1 inputs, such as quoted prices in an active market; Level 2 inputs, which are observable inputs for similar assets; or Level 3 inputs, which are unobservable inputs.  The carrying value of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The estimated fair values of our debt approximate the recorded values as of the balance sheet dates presented, based on Level 2 inputs as defined by GAAP consisting of interest rates offered to us for loans with similar maturities and risks. We used Level 3 inputs when assessing the fair value of goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment.

Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable consist primarily of casino, hotel and other receivables, are typically non-interest bearing, and are carried, net of an appropriate collection allowance to approximate fair value. The collections allowance isAllowances for doubtful accounts are estimated based on specific review of customer accounts including the customers' willingness and ability to pay and nature of any collateral, if any, as well as historical collection experience and current economic and business conditions.  Accounts are written off when management deems the account to be uncollectible and recoveries of accounts previously written off are recorded when received. 

Property and Equipment. We define a fixed asset as a unit of property that: (a) has an economic useful life that extends beyond 12 months; and (b) was acquired or produced for a cost greater than $2,500 for a single asset, or greater than $5,000 for a group of assets, for a specific capital project. Fixed assets are capitalized and depreciated while normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense. A significant amount of the Company’s property and equipment was acquired through business combinations and therefore recognized at fair value at the acquisition date.  Gains or losses on dispositions of property and equipment are included in the determination of income.operating expenses, effectively as adjustments to depreciation estimates. 

Certain events or changes in circumstances may indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment should be assessed, including, among others, a significant decrease in market value, a significant change in the business climate in a particular market, or a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with historical losses or projected future losses. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset (or asset group) and its eventual disposition. These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount, we recognize an impairment loss. The impairment loss recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value.

Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the term of the lease, whichever is appropriate under the circumstances. We determine the estimated useful lives based on our experience with similar assets, estimated usage of the asset, and industry practice. Whenever events or circumstances occur which change the estimated useful life of an asset, we account for the change prospectively.  Depreciation and amortization is provided over the following estimated useful lives:
 
Land improvements15 years
Buildings and improvements103 to 3944 years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment2 to 10 years



55



Capitalized Interest. The interest cost associated with major development and construction projects is capitalized and included in the cost of the project.  Interest expense is capitalized atusing the applicableCompany's weighted-average borrowing rates of interest, and added to the project cost.rate of specific borrowings for the subject, or a combination of the two. Interest capitalization ceases once a project is substantially complete or no longer undergoing construction activities to prepare it for its intended use. The Company capitalized $0 and $0.4 million of interest during 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of theBronco Billy's Casino and Hotel, Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel, Rising Star Casino Resort and Stockman’s Casino properties over the estimated fair value of their net tangible and other intangible assets on the acquisition date, net of subsequent impairment charges. Our other indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily include certain license rights to conduct gaming in certain jurisdictions and trademarks.trade names. Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are periodically tested for impairment.  We also periodically review our indefinite-lived assets to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.  If it is determined that an indefinite-lived intangible asset has a finite useful life, then the asset is tested for impairment and is subsequently accounted for as a finite-lived intangible asset.the appropriateness of remaining estimated useful lives.  

We test our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assetsThese tests for impairment are performed annually during the fourth quarter or when a triggering event occurs, and evaluate goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets using an income approach to value applying a typical discounted cash flows methodology.occurs.

Finite-lived Intangible Assets. Our finite-lived intangible assets include customer loyalty programs, land leaseslease acquisition costs and water rights. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the shorter of their contractual or economic lives.  We periodically evaluate the remaining useful lives of these intangible assets to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization. We also review our finite-lived intangible assetsamortization and the possible need for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

Debt Issuance Costs. In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” (“ASU 2015-03”), which is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs to


be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount. The amortization of such costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. Accordingly, the Company has adopted this accounting standard and reclassified the prior-period amounts to conform to the current-period presentation.

Debt issuance costs include costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt and are capitalized and amortized over the contractual term of the debt to interest expense using the effective interest method. When our existing debt agreements are modified, we capitalize any new amounts paid and amortize such costs to interest expense using the effective interest method over the terms of the modified debt agreement. During 2015 and 2014, we incurred $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of additional costs related to amendment modifications to our First and Second Lien Credit Facilities. The First Lien amendment modifications included an extended maturity date to October 1, 2016, and the Second Lien amendment modifications included an extended maturity date to April 1, 2017. Thus, the amortization periods for these costs were also extended.

Revenue Recognition and Promotional Allowances.  Casino revenue is the aggregate net difference between gaming wins and losses, with certain liabilities recognized including progressive jackpots, earned customer loyaltycustomer-loyalty incentives, funds deposited by customers before gaming play occurs and for chips and tokens in the customers’ possession.  Key performance indicators related to gaming revenue are slot coin-in and table game drop (volume indicators) and “win” or “hold” percentage.
 
Hotel, food and beverage, entertainment and other operating revenues are recognized as these services are performed. Advance deposits on rooms and advance ticket sales are recorded as deferred revenue until services are provided to the customer without regard to whether they are refundable. Sales and similar revenue-linked taxes collected from customers on behalf of, and submitted to, taxing authorities are also excluded from revenue and recorded as a current liability.

Net revenues are recognized net of certain sales incentives and, accordingly, cash incentives for gambling activity such as cash back and free play has been netted against gross revenues. The retail value of hotel accommodations, food and beverage items and entertainment provided to guests without charge is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances to arrive at net revenues. The estimated costs of providing these promotional allowances are primarily included in casino operating expenses. The amounts in promotional allowances and the estimated cost of such promotional allowances are noted in the tables below:
Retail Value of Promotional Allowances  

(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Food and beverage$18,872
 $16,104
Rooms$5,585
 $4,180
7,090
 5,585
Food and beverage16,104
 12,315
Other incentives1,351
 1,336
1,458
 1,351
$23,040
 $17,831
$27,420
 $23,040

56



 
Costs of Providing Promotional Allowances      

(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Food and beverage$17,324
 $14,040
Rooms$3,659
 $3,412
4,426
 3,659
Food and beverage14,040
 12,451
Other incentives1,010
 991
975
 1,010
$18,709
 $16,854
$22,725
 $18,709
 
Advertising Costs.  Costs for advertising are expensed as incurred or the first time the advertising takes place and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Total advertising costs were $2.0$2.5 million and $1.8$2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively.

Derivative Instruments – Interest Rate Cap Agreement. We adopted the accounting guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities (ASC Topic 815, “DerivativesDerivatives and Hedging”)Hedging), as amended, to account for our interest rate cap.cap agreement. Our interest rate cap agreement is classified as a risk management instrument and management elected not to apply hedge accounting.
 
Customer Loyalty Programs. We have customer loyalty programs at each of our properties – the Silver Slipper Casino Players Club, theBronco Billy’s MVP “Most Valuable Players” Club, Rising Star Rewards Club™, the Grand Lodge Players Advantage Club® and the Stockman’s Winner’s Club.  Under these programs, customers earn points based on their volume of wagering that may be redeemed for various benefits, such as free play, cash back, complimentary dining, or hotel stays, among others, depending on


each property’s specific offers. Unredeemed points are forfeited if the customer becomes and remains inactive for a specified period of time.  At December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, our liability for the estimated cost to provide such benefits totaled $0.9$1.3 million and $1.0$0.9 million, respectively. Such amounts are included in “other accrued expenses" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Project Development and Acquisition Costs. Project development and acquisition costs consist of amounts expended on potential developmentsthe pursuit of new business opportunities and acquisitions. Theseacquisitions, which are expensed as incurred. During 2016 and 2015, these costs primarily include legal and other professional fees during 2015 for the pending acquisition ofrelated to costs associated with acquiring Bronco Billy's and the American Place development, and the terminated acquisition of Majestic Starfor potential projects in 2014.Indiana.
 
Share-based Compensation. Share-based compensation costs are measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for stock options, and based on the closing share price of the Company's stock on the grant date for other share-based awards. The cost is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the employee's requisite service period (the vesting period of the award) net of estimated forfeitures.

Legal Defense Costs. We do not accrue for estimated future legal and related defense costs, if any, to be incurred in connection with outstanding or threatened litigation and other disputed matters. Instead, we record such costs as period costs when the related services are rendered.

Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets when it is deemed more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized within a reasonable time period.
 
Our income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other tax authorities. Positions taken in tax returns are sometimes subject to uncertainty in the tax laws and may not ultimately be accepted by the IRS or other tax authorities.  We assess our tax positions using a two-step process. A tax position is recognized if it meets a “more likely than not” threshold, and is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty50 percent likely of being realized.  Additionally, we recognize accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Earnings (loss) per share. Earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the additional dilution for all potentially-dilutive securities, including stock options and unvested restricted shareswarrants using the treasury stock method.

57



For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and 2014,we recorded a net loss. Accordingly, all potentially dilutive securities, totaling 1,563,8343,064,518 and 943,8341,563,834 shares, were excluded from the earnings (loss)loss per share computation, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. These securities could potentially dilute

In November 2016 the Company completed a rights offering to existing common stockholders (see Note 13). Because the rights issue was offered to all existing stockholders at an exercise price that was less than the fair value of the stock, the weighted average shares outstanding and basic and diluted earnings per share inwere adjusted retroactively to reflect the future.bonus element of the rights offering for all periods presented. As a result, for the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company retroactively adjusted the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding from 18,937,812 to 19,607,937. This had no material effect on the previously reported basic and diluted loss per share.

Other reclassifications. Certain minor reclassifications have been made to 2015 amounts to conform to the current-period presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on the previously reported net loss or retained earnings.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. We have reviewed authoritative standardsIn February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” (“ASU 2016-02”), which replaces the existing guidance in ASC 840, Leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 31,15, 2018. ASU 2016-02 requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee would account for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition model, ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 has been amended by ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-11 and ASU 2016-12, which the FASB issued in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016, May 2016 and others not yet effective.May 2016, respectively. ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single, comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with


customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including gaming industry specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 also provides a five-step analysis in determining how and when the revenue is recognized. ASU 2014-09 will require revenue recognition to represent the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. Revenues are defined as inflows or other enhancements of assets of an entity or settlements of its liabilities (or a combination of both) from delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or other activities that constitute the entity’s ongoing major or central operations. As a result, we determinedrevenues will be presented net of the retail value of goods and services provided to customers on a complimentary basis.The effective date for the amended ASU 2014-09 is for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company does not plan to early adopt and is currently evaluating the newimplementation approach to be used which will assist with the analysis and disclosure of the effect of the adoption of the amended ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements.

Management believes that there are no other recently issued accounting standards not yet effective that are not likely to have any significanta material impact on our future financial statements.

3. ACQUISITION

On May 13, 2016, we completed our acquisition of Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel from Pioneer Group, Inc. for consideration of $31.1 million, inclusive of an adjustment for net working capital. The acquisition included the three licensed operations in Cripple Creek, Colorado known as Bronco Billy's Casino, Buffalo Billy's Casino and Billy's Casino (collectively referred to as "Bronco Billy's"). The results of Bronco Billy's operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. The acquisition was financed primarily through a $35 million increase in our Second Lien Credit Facility (see Note 7). Bronco Billy’s has approximately 807 slot and video poker machines, 12 table games and a 24-room hotel. This acquisition diversifies our operations into a new geographical market.

During the fourth quarter we completed our valuation analysis. Our fair value estimates utilize significant unobservable inputs and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements. The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):
   
Cash and equivalents $2,682
Other current assets 258
Property and equipment 16,694
Goodwill4,806
Gaming licenses 7,000
Trade names 1,800
Total assets 33,240
   
Current liabilities 2,189
Total liabilities 2,189
   
Net assets acquired $31,051

The $4.8 million of goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired, was primarily attributable to expected synergies and the economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized, including the assembled workforce. All of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The Company incurred $0.6 million of project development and acquisition costs related to this business combination during 2016 and $0.4 million during 2015. We also incurred $1.5 million of debt issuance costs, $0.6 million of warrant issuance costs, and $0.6 million of debt modification expenses in conjunction with the refinanced credit facilities.

From May 13, 2016 through December 31, 2016, Bronco Billy's revenues were $16.2 million and net income was $2.0 million and were included in our consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.



The following unaudited pro forma consolidated income statement for the Company includes the results of Bronco Billy's as if the acquisition and related financing transactions occurred on January 1, 2015. The pro forma financial information does not necessarily represent the results that might have actually occurred or may occur in the future. The pro forma amounts include the historical operating results of Full House and Bronco Billy's prior to the acquisition, adjusted only for matters directly attributable to the acquisition, which primarily include interest expense related to the amended and restated First and Second Lien Credit Facilities (see Note 7). The pro forma results also reflect adjustments for the impact of depreciation and amortization expense based on the estimated fair value of property and equipment acquired, income tax expense, and the removal of non-recurring expenses directly attributable to the transaction of $1.4 million and $1.0 million during 2016 and 2015, respectively. These non-recurring expenses primarily related to acquisition costs and debt modification costs. The pro forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits from the acquisition.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
(In thousands, unaudited)
  
 For the year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Net revenues$154,734
 $149,150
Net loss(5,818) (4,157)
Basic loss per share(0.30) (0.21)
Diluted loss per share(0.30) (0.21)

4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
 December 31,
 2015 2014
Land and improvements$12,657
 $11,670
Buildings and improvements90,636
 73,997
Furniture and equipment31,899
 27,951
Construction in progress13
 11,264
 135,205
 124,882
Less accumulated depreciation(36,223) (29,842)
 $98,982
 $95,040

The hotel at Silver Slipper opened in phases, beginning in May 2015 and was completed during the third quarter. The total costs incurred for the construction of the hotel were $20.5 million.  During 2014, we disposed of certain assets primarily related to a partial hotel remodel at Rising Star Casino Resort and recorded a $0.4 million loss on disposal.
 December 31,
 2016 2015
Land and improvements$14,548
 $12,657
Buildings and improvements102,410
 90,636
Furniture and equipment37,312
 31,899
Construction in progress868
 13
 155,138
 135,205
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(43,673) (36,223)
 $111,465
 $98,982

At December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, property and equipment included assets under capitalized leases detailed in the table below (in thousands), is related to theour 104-room hotel at Rising Star Casino Resort (Note 7) and is also included in the schedule above.8) as follows (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Leased land and improvements$215
 $215
$215
 $215
Leased buildings and improvements5,787
 5,787
5,787
 5,787
Leased furniture and equipment1,724
 1,717
1,724
 1,724
7,726
 7,719
7,726
 7,726
Less accumulated amortization(1,081) (582)(1,586) (1,081)
$6,645
 $7,137
$6,140
 $6,645

Amortization related to the Rising Star Casino Resort capital lease is combined with depreciation expense.

4.

5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over fair value of net tangible and other intangible assets acquired in connection with Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel, Rising Star Casino Resort and Stockman’s Casino business combinations, net of subsequent impairments as summarized below.

There were no impairments to goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2015. During 2014, we performed interim impairment assessments of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets during the second quarter for all relevant properties and recognized a $1.6 million and $9.9 million impairment of Rising Star Casino Resort’s goodwill and gaming license, respectively, due to various factors, including declines in operating results, weak economic conditions, lower than anticipated discretionary consumer spending, and increased competition in our regional market. We evaluated the fair value of these assets using the income (discounted cash flow) approach which use Level 3 inputs as defined by GAAP. Key assumptions included in the analysis were estimates of future cash flows including outflows for capital expenditures, a long-term growth rate of 1% and a discount rate of 11.2%.  

58



Goodwill:

The following tables set forth changes in the carrying value of goodwill by segment:segment (in thousands):
December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
December 31, 2016
Gross Carrying Value Accumulated Impairments 
Balance at
end of the
year
Gross Carrying Value Accumulated Impairments 
Balance at
End of the
Year
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel$14,671
 $
 $14,671
Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel4,806
 
 4,806
Rising Star Casino Resort1,647
 (1,647) 
Northern Nevada$5,809
 $(4,000) $1,809
5,809
 (4,000) 1,809
Rising Star Casino Resort1,647
 (1,647) 
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel14,671
 
 14,671
Goodwill, net of accumulated impairment losses$22,127
 $(5,647) $16,480
$26,933
 $(5,647) $21,286

December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
December 31, 2015
Gross Carrying Value Accumulated Impairments 
Balance at
end of the
year
Gross Carrying Value Accumulated Impairments 
Balance at
End of the
Year
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel$14,671
 $
 $14,671
Rising Star Casino Resort1,647
 (1,647) 
Northern Nevada$5,809
 $(4,000) $1,809
5,809
 (4,000) 1,809
Rising Star Casino Resort1,647
 (1,647) 
Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel14,671
 
 14,671
Goodwill, net of accumulated impairment losses$22,127
 $(5,647) $16,480
$22,127
 $(5,647) $16,480
 
There were no impairments to goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Intangible Assets:

The following tables set forth changes in the carrying value of intangible assets:assets (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
 
Estimated
Life
(Years)
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Accumulated Impairments /
Write-offs, Net
 
Intangible
Assets, Net
Amortizing Intangible Assets:         
Customer Loyalty Program - Rising Star3 $1,700
 $(1,700) $
 $
Customer Loyalty Program - Silver Slipper3 5,900
 (5,900) 
 
Land Lease and Water Rights - Silver Slipper46 1,420
 (101) 
 1,319
Non-amortizing Intangible Assets:   
  
  
 

Gaming License - Rising StarIndefinite 10,034
 
 (9,900) 134
Gaming License – Silver SlipperIndefinite 127
 
 
 127
Gaming License – Northern NevadaIndefinite 384
 
 (104) 280
Gaming License - ColoradoIndefinite 199
 
 
 199
TrademarksIndefinite 68
 
 
 68
   $19,832
 $(7,701) $(10,004) $2,127
 December 31, 2016
 
Estimated
Life
(Years)
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairments, Net 
Intangible
Assets, Net
          
Customer Loyalty Programs3 $7,600
 $(7,600) $
 $
Land Lease and Water Rights46 1,420
 (132) 
 1,288
Gaming LicensesIndefinite 17,981
 
 (10,203) 7,778
Trade NamesIndefinite 1,800
 
 
 1,800
TrademarksIndefinite 100
 
 
 100
   $28,901
 $(7,732) $(10,203) $10,966
 


59




 
December 31, 2014
(in thousands)
 
Estimated
Life
(Years)
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairments/ Write-offs, Net 
Intangible
Assets, Net
Amortizing Intangible Assets:         
Customer Loyalty Program - Rising Star3 $1,700
 $(1,700) $
 $
Customer Loyalty Program - Silver Slipper3 5,900
 (4,425) 
 1,475
Land Lease and Water Rights - Silver Slipper46 1,420
 (70) 
 1,350
Non-amortizing Intangible Assets:   
  
  
 

Gaming License - Rising StarIndefinite 9,900
 
 (9,900) 
Gaming License – Silver SlipperIndefinite 105
 
 (44) 61
Gaming License – Northern NevadaIndefinite 523
 
 (67) 456
TrademarksIndefinite 40
 
 
 40
   $19,588
 $(6,195) $(10,011) $3,382
 December 31, 2015
 
Estimated
Life
(Years)
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairments, Net 
Intangible
Assets, Net
          
Customer Loyalty Programs3 $7,600
 $(7,600) $
 $
Land Lease and Water Rights46 1,420
 (101) 
 1,319
Gaming LicensesIndefinite 10,744
 
 (10,004) 740
TrademarksIndefinite 68
 
 
 68
   $19,832
 $(7,701) $(10,004) $2,127
 
Customer Loyalty Programs. The customerCustomer loyalty programs represent the value of repeat business associated with Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel’s and Rising Star Casino Resort’sour loyalty programs.  The valuevalues of $5.9 million for Silver Slipper and $1.7 million of the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel’s andfor Rising Star Casino Resort’sStar's customer loyalty programs, respectively, were determined using a multi-period excess earning method of the income approach, which examines the economic returns contributed by the identified tangible and intangible assets of a company, and then isolates the excess return, which is attributable to the asset being valued, based on cash flows attributable to the customer loyalty program.  The valuation analyses for the active rated players were based on projected revenues and attrition rates.  Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel and Rising Star Casino Resort maintain historical information for the proportion of revenues attributable to the rated players for gross gaming revenue.  The value of the customer loyalty programs are amortized over a life of three years.

Land Lease Acquisition Costs and Water Rights.  In November 2004, our subsidiary, Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC, entered into arecognized intangible assets related to its lease agreement with Cure Land Company, LLC for approximately 38 acres of land (“Land Lease”), which includes approximately 31 acres of protected marshland and the seven-acre casino parcel on which the Silver Slipper Casino(see Note 12). The lease was subsequently built. Thevalued at $1 million Land Leaseand represents the excess fair value of the land over the estimated net present value of the Land Lease payments.  Theland lease payments, and the water rights value of $0.4 million of water rights represented the fair value of the water rights based upon market rates in Hancock County, Mississippi.  The term of the land lease matures in April 2058.
 
Gaming Licenses.  Gaming licenses represent the value of the license to conduct gaming in certain jurisdictions, which are subject to highly extensive regulatory oversight and, in some cases, a limitation on the number of licenses available for issuance.  The valuevalues of the $9.9 million Rising Star Casino Resort gaming license waslicenses were primarily estimated using a multi-period excess earning method of the income approach, which examines the economic returns contributed by the identified tangible and intangible assets of a company, and then isolates the excess return, which is attributable to the asset being valued, based on cash flows attributable to the gaming license. The other gaming license values are based on actual costs. Gaming licenses are not amortized as they have indefinite useful lives and are evaluated for potential impairment on an annual basis unless events or changes in circumstances indicate

Trade Names. Trade names represents the carrying amountvalue of the gaming licenses may not be recoverable.  We reviewed existing gaming licensesBronco Billy's casino name which has existed for approximately 25 years and recognized an expense of $0.1 million during 2015, and $10.2 million, includingprovides brand recognition. The value was estimated using a $9.9 million impairmentmulti-period excess earning method of the gaming license at Rising Star Casino Resort, during 2014.income approach based upon comparable trade name royalty agreements.

Current and Future Amortization.   Intangible asset amortization expense was $1.5 million$31,000 and $2.1$1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and December 31, 2014,2015, respectively.

Total amortization expense for intangible assets is expected to be $31,000 for each of the years ending 20162017 through 20202021 and $1.3 million thereafter.
 

60



5.6. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Other accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Player club points and progressive jackpots$1,667
 $1,709
$2,901
 $1,667
Real estate and personal property taxes909
 1,172
1,538
 909
Gaming and other taxes962
 789
1,667
 962
Gaming related accruals410
 490
622
 410
Accrued rent443
 
Accrued interest195
 159
174
 195
Other613
 1,094
651
 613
$4,756
 $5,413
$7,996
 $4,756
 
6. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

 December 31,
  2015 2014
First Term Loan, maturing April 1, 2017 (as amended), variable interest rate which averaged 4.75% in 2015 and 2014$46,000
 $38,631
Revolving Loan, maturing April 1, 2017 (as amended), variable interest rate which averaged 4.75% in 2015 and 20142,000
 2,000
Second Term Loan, maturing April 1, 2017, variable interest rate (as amended) averaged 14.25% in 2015; interest rate was fixed in 2014 at 14.25% effective July 18, 2014 and fixed at 13.25% prior to July 18, 201420,000
 20,000
 68,000
 60,631
Less current portion(6,000) (1,337)
 $62,000
 $59,294

First and Second Lien Credit Facilities7. During 2012,LONG-TERM DEBT AND COMMON STOCK WARRANT LIABILITY
Long-Term Debt

On May 13, 2016, we entered into thean amended and restated First Lien Credit Facility ("First Lien Credit Facility") with Capital One Bank, N.A., ("Capital One"), which included theincludes a First Term Loan of $45 million and Revolving Loan of $2 million, and thean amended and restated Second Lien Credit Facility ("Second Lien Credit Facility") with ABC Funding, LLC, which included a term loan facility increase from $20 million to $55 million, of which the additional proceeds of $35 million were used primarily to complete our acquisition of Silver Slipper Casino.Bronco Billy's.  The First and Second Lien Credit Facilities are secured by substantially all of our assets and our wholly-owned subsidiaries except for FHR-Colorado LLC which was formed to acquire Bronco Billy's, guarantee our obligationobligations under the agreements.  The Second Lien Credit Facility is subordinate to the lien of the First Lien Credit Facility.

Long-term debt, related discounts and issuance costs consists of the following:
(In thousands)December 31, 2016
 Outstanding Principal Unamortized Discount Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs 
Long-term
Debt, Net
First Term Loan$43,312
 $
 $(561) $42,751
Revolving Loan
 
 
 
Second Term Loan55,000
 (469) (1,348) 53,183
Total debt including current maturities98,312
 (469) (1,909) 95,934
Less current portion(1,688) 
 
 (1,688)
Total long-term debt, net$96,624
 $(469) $(1,909) $94,246

(In thousands)December 31, 2015
 Outstanding Principal Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs 
Long-term
Debt, Net
First Term Loan$46,000
 $(777) $45,223
Revolving Loan2,000
 
 2,000
Second Term Loan20,000
 (581) 19,419
Total debt including current maturities68,000
 (1,358) 66,642
Less current portion(6,000) 
 (6,000)
Total long-term debt, net$62,000
 $(1,358) $60,642

First Lien Credit Facility

. The First Lien Credit Facility as amended, provided for the First Term Loanmatures in an amount up to $56.3 million which included a $10 million construction term loan to build the hotel at Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel,May 2019 and the Revolving Loan for up to $5 million. Interest-onlyrequires monthly interest-only payments are due monthly, and quarterly scheduled principal payments of $1.5 million,$562,500 through May 2018, with such quarterly principal payments increasing to $843,750 thereafter through maturity. We incurred debt issuance costs of $248,000, which include $0.25 million forare being amortized over the constructionremaining term of the loan, began Octoberand expensed debt modification costs of $330,000. We made our required quarterly payment of $562,500 due January 1, 2015.2017 on December 30, 2016.

We have elected to payThe interest onrate of the First Lien Credit Facility is initially based on the greater of the elected London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate(as defined) or 1.0%, plus a margin rate. LIBOR rate elections can be made based on a 30-day, 60-day, 90-dayof 3.75%. The margin rate of 3.75% will increase by 50 basis points beginning in May 2017. There is no prepayment premium or 180-day LIBOR, and margins are adjusted quarterly.  As of December 31, 2015, the interest rate was 4.75%cap associated with this facility.

Second Lien Credit Facility. The Second Lien Credit Facility matures on the balance outstanding onearlier of (i) May 13, 2022, or (ii) six months following the maturity date of the First Lien Credit Facility. Given that the First Lien Credit Facility based oncurrently matures in May 2019, the minimum, plus a 3.75% margin.  

As of December 31, 2015, commensurate with the completion of the hotel at Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel, we had drawn all of the proceeds of the $10 million construction term loan. The final costs related to the construction are still being resolved, and approximately $569,000 of those proceeds remain in a trust account and will be used to fund the remaining construction costs.

During 2015 and 2014, the First Lien Credit Facility was amended as follows:

61




On July 18, 2014, we entered into the First Lien 2ndAmendment effective as of June 30, 2014 which:
Revised certain financial ratio covenants as of June 30, 2014, and going forward through the term of the loans;
Extended the time period to March 31, 2015 for draws against the $10 million construction term loan; and
Extended the payment terms for the construction term loan to begin on April 1, 2015.

On January 9, 2015 we entered into the First Lien 3rd Amendment effective as of December 31, 2014 which:
Revised certain financial ratio covenants as of December 31, 2014, and going forward through the term of the loan;
Extended the time period to May 31, 2015 for draws against the $10 million construction term loan; and
Extended the payment terms for the construction term loan to begin on June 1, 2015.

We entered into the First Lien 4th Amendment effective as of May 31, 2015 which:
Extended the period for draws against the $10 million construction term loan to August 31, 2015; and
Extended the payment terms for the construction term loan to begin on October 1, 2015.


On August 5, 2015 we entered into the First Lien 5th Amendment effective as of June 30, 2015 which:
Revised certain financial covenant ratios as of June 30, 2015, and going forward through the term of the loans; and
Extended thecurrent maturity date for the First Lien Credit Facility from June 29, 2016 to October 1, 2016.

As disclosed in Footnote 15, the maturity of the First Lien Credit Facility was extended to April 1, 2017, and, as a result, the Company revised the debt maturities schedule.

Second Lien Credit Facility

The Second Lien Credit Facility provided foris November 2019. Interest is currently payable monthly at a term loan in anrate of 13.5% (and may vary between 12.5% and 13.5%, depending on the total leverage of the Company), and there are no quarterly principal payment requirements as all principal is due at maturity. The prepayment premium is 3% of the total principal amount up to $20 million,until May 13, 2017, 2% until May 13, 2018, 1% until May 13, 2019, and was amended during 2015 and 2014 as follows:

On July 18, 2014, we entered intono prepayment premium thereafter. We incurred debt issuance costs of $1,239,000, which are being amortized over the Second Lien 2nd Amendment which:
Revised certain financial ratio covenants as of June 30, 2014, and going forward through thecurrent remaining term of the loan;loan, and
Increased the interest rate by one percentage point to 14.25% for the remainder expensed debt modification costs of the term of the loan.$294,000.

On January 9, 2015, we entered into the Second Lien 3rd Amendment, which became effective December 31, 2014, which:
Revised certain financial ratio covenants as of December 31, 2014, and going forward through the term of the loan; and
Extended the maturity date to April 1, 2017.

On August 5, 2015, we entered into the Second Lien 4th Amendment effective June 30, 2015, which:
Revised certain financial ratio covenants as of June 30, 2015, and going forward through the term of the loan;
Created a pricing grid to allow the interest rate to vary between 13.25% and 15.25% with changes in our leverage ratios as defined; and
Amended the prepayment premium.

Covenants. The First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities contain customary negative covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to: incur indebtedness; grant liens; pay dividends and make other restricted payments; make investments; make fundamental changes;


dispose of assets; and change the basic underlying nature of our business. We are also required to make capital expenditures of at least 1.425%, and no more than 5.25%, of our prior-year revenues, excluding capital expenditures made from any future sale of equity securities.

The First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities define Adjusted EBITDA as, for any four fiscal quarter period, (a) net income (loss) for such period, plus (b) to the extent deducted in determining net income (loss) for such period: (i) interest expense, (ii) provisions for income taxes, (iii) depreciation and amortization expenses, (iv) extraordinary losses (including non-cash impairment charges), (v) stock compensation expense, (vi) acquisition costs related to Bronco Billy's in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1 million, (vii) pre-opening expenses related to the hotel at Silver Slipper that opened in 2015, and (viii) non-recurring development expenses for new initiatives in an aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000 for the trailing four consecutive fiscal quarters, minus (c) extraordinary gains, and minus (d) joint venture net income, unless such net income has been actually received by the Company in the form of cash dividends or distributions. Adjusted EBITDA shall include results for Bronco Billy's as if it were owned for the entire measurement period.

The First Lien and Second Lien Credit Facilities require that we maintain specified financial covenants, including a total leverage ratio, a first lien leverage ratio, and a fixed chargefixed-charge coverage ratio, all of which measure Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the agreements) against outstanding debt and fixed charges (as defined in the agreements). A capital expenditure ratio must also be maintained which requires we invest at least 1.5%, and no more than 5%, of our prior-year revenues, excluding costs related to the Silver Slipper hotel project. The First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit Facility currently define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus (a) interest expense, (b) provisions for income taxes, and (c) depreciation and amortization, and further adjusted to eliminate the impact of certain items that are either non-cash items or are not indicative of ongoing operating performance such as (d) extraordinary gains and losses (including non-cash impairment charges), (e) non-cash stock compensation expense, (f) certain acquisition costs, including the Company’s canceled acquisition of the Fitz Tunica Casino & Hotel (g) costs related to the Company’s canceled S-1 registration statement filed in early 2014, (h) board and management transition expenses from the changes enacted in 2014 (i) pre-opening and development costs for the construction of the hotel at Silver Slipper, and (j) joint venture net income, unless such net income has actually been received by the Company in the form of cash dividends or distributions. For purposes of our covenants, we also received pro forma credit for gaming tax reductions implemented in Indiana in 2014 and the first quarter of 2015.

62




The revisedThese financial covenant ratios currently are as detailed in the First Lien 5th Amendment and Second Lien 4th Amendment, are stated in the tables below:follows:
First Lien Credit Facility
 
 
Applicable Period
Maximum
Total Leverage
Ratio
 
Maximum
First Lien Leverage
Ratio
 
Minimum
Fixed Charge
Coverage Ratio
April 1, 2016 through and including March 30, 2017
5.875x2.750x
June 30, 2015March 31, 2017 through and including September 29, 20156.85x2017 4.85x5.875x 1.10x2.625x
September 30, 2015 through and including December 30, 20156.75x4.75x1.10x
December 31, 20152017 through and including March 30, 20166.35x2018 4.35x5.750x 1.10x2.500x
March 31, 2016 through and including June 29, 20166.15x4.15x1.10x
June 30, 20162018 through and including September 29, 20165.85x2018 4.00x5.625x 1.10x2.375x
September 30, 20162018 through and including March 30, 20195.375x2.250x
March 31, 2019 and thereafter5.50x5.250x 3.75x2.125x 1.10x

Additionally, the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio as of the last day of any fiscal quarter shall not be less than 1.10x.

Second Lien Credit Facility
 
 
Applicable Period
Maximum
Total Leverage
Ratio
 
Maximum
First Lien Leverage
Ratio
 
Minimum
Fixed Charge
Coverage Ratio
April 1, 2016 through and including March 30, 2017
6.125x3.000x
June 30, 2015March 31, 2017 through and including September 29, 20157.10x2017 5.10x6.125x 1.00x2.875x
September 30, 2015 through and including December 30, 20157.00x5.00x1.00x
December 31, 20152017 through and including March 30, 20166.60x2018 4.60x6.000x 1.00x2.750x
March 31, 2016 through and including June 29, 20166.40x4.40x1.00x
June 30, 20162018 through and including September 29, 20166.10x2018 4.25x5.875x 1.00x2.625x
September 30, 20162018 through and including March 30, 20195.625x2.500x
March 31, 2019 through and including September 29, 20195.500x2.375x
September 30, 2019 and thereafter5.75x5.250x 4.00x2.250x 1.00x

Additionally, the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio as of the last day of any fiscal quarter shall not be less than 1.0x.

We were in compliance with our covenants as of December 31, 2015;2016; however, there can be no assurances that we will remain in compliance with all covenants in the future. The First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities also include customary events of default, including, among other things: non-payment; breach of covenant; breach of representation or warranty; cross-default under certain other indebtedness or guarantees; commencement of insolvency proceedings; inability to pay debts; entry of certain material judgments against us or our subsidiaries; occurrence of certain ERISA events; re-purchaserepurchase of our own stockstock; and certain changes of control. A breach of a covenant or other events of default could cause the loans to be immediately due and payable, terminate commitments for additional loan funds, or the lenders could exercise any other remedy available under the First Lien Credit Facility orand Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities or by law.  If a breach of covenants or other event of default were to occur, we would seek modifications to


covenants or a temporary waiver or waivers from the First Lien Credit Facility and Second Lien Credit FacilityFacilities lenders. No assurance can be given that we would be successful in obtaining such waivers or modifications.

We are required to make prepayments under the First Lien Credit Facility, under certain conditions as defined in the agreement, in addition to the scheduled principal installments for any fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 or thereafter.  Prepayment penalties will be assessed in the event that prepayments are made onas defined. With regards to the Second Lien Credit Facility, no mandatory prepayments are required prior to the discharge of the First Lien Credit Facility.

Maturities of Long-Term Debt. Maturities of the principal amount of the Company’s long-term debt as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:
 (In thousands)
2017$1,688
20182,812
201993,812
 $98,312

Common Stock Warrant Liability

As noted above,part of the maturities schedule presented below has been adjusted for the subsequent amendment to the FirstSecond Lien Credit Facility, on May 13, 2016, the Company granted the second lien lenders 1,006,568 warrants representing 5% of the outstanding common equity of the Company, as discusseddetermined on a fully-diluted basis. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.67 (the average trading price of the Company's common stock during a 60-day period bracketing the completion of the financing) and expire May 13, 2026. The warrants also provide the second lien lenders with redemption rights, pre-emptive rights under certain circumstances to maintain their 5% ownership interest in Footnote 15.  Scheduled debt repayments based on this amendment for the Company, piggyback registration rights and mandatory registration rights after two years. The redemption rights allow the second lien lenders, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of all of the warrants in the event of: (i) the maturity of the Second Lien Credit Facility, (ii) an acceleration pursuant to the Second Lien Credit Facility, (iii) a refinancing, repayment or other transaction decreasing the aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Facility debt outstanding as of May 13, 2016 by more than 50%, (iv) a liquidity event, as defined, or (v) the Company's insolvency. The repurchase value is the 21-day average price of the Company's stock at the time of the event, as defined, net of the warrant exercise price. If the redemption rights are exercised, the repurchase amount is payable by the Company in cash or through the issuance of an unsecured note with a four-year term and a minimum interest rate of 13.25%, as further defined. Although unsecured, the note would be guaranteed by the Company's subsidiaries. Alternatively, the second lien lenders may choose to have the Company register and sell the shares related to the warrants through a public stock offering.

We measure the fair value of the warrants at each reporting period. The fair value at issuance of the warrants was $0.6 million, which was recorded as a liability due to the redemption feature and a resulting discount to the Second Lien Credit Facility. The discount is amortized to interest expense during the expected term of the Second Lien Credit Facility, which is currently 3.5 years. The Company recognized $0.5 million of expense from May 13, 2016 to December 31, 2016 due to a change in the fair value of the warrants, which was reflected as part of "Other" non-operating expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Due to the variable terms regarding the timing of the settlement of the warrants, the Company utilized a "Monte Carlo" simulation approach, a mathematical technique used to model the probability of different outcomes, to measure the fair value of the warrants at issuance. The simulation included the Company's stock price and the following assumptions: an expected contractual term of 3.85 years, an expected stock price volatility rate of 44.78%, an expected dividend yield of 0%, and an expected risk-free interest rate of 1.1%. The simulation included certain estimates by Company management regarding the estimated timing of the settlement of the warrants. Significant increases or decreases in those management estimates would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The Company also utilized the Monte Carlo simulation approach for its valuation at December 31, 2015 are as follows, for2016, which included the annual periods ended December 31 (in thousands):
2016$6,000
201762,000
 $68,000
following assumptions: an expected contractual term of 3.38 years, an expected stock price volatility rate of 47.68%, an expected dividend yield of 0%, and an expected risk-free interest rate of 1.68%.



63






7.8. CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION

Rising Star Casino Resort Capital Lease. Our Indiana subsidiary, Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC, leases a 104-room hotel at Rising Star Casino Resort pursuant to a capital lease agreement (the “Rising Star Lease Agreement”) with Rising Sun/Ohio County First, Inc., an Indiana non-profit corporation (the “Landlord”). Rent is fixed atOn March 16, 2016, the hotel lease agreement was amended. The amendment extended the initial term of the lease by four years to October 1, 2027 and modified the rent payment schedule. The rental rate has been reduced from $77,537 per month throughoutas follows: (i) to $48,537 per month from April 2016 through March 2017, (ii) to $56,537 per month from April 2017 through March 2018; (iii) to $57,537 per month from April 2018 through March 2019; and (iv) to $63,537 per month from April 2019 through March 2020. Beginning April 1, 2020 through the end of the lease, term and hasthe scheduled monthly payment shall be $54,326. The amendment also requires the Company to make certain improvements to the Rising Star Casino Resort of at least $1 million by March 31, 2017 which the Company intends to satisfy. If the Company does not make the $1 million of improvements, the lease will revert back to the original payment schedule. The lease payments include an annual interest rate of 2.5% until September 30, 2015, 3.5% from October 1, 2015 untilthrough September 30, 2017 and 4.5% thereafter. The ten-year lease term expires on October 1, 2023.

At any time during the lease term, we have the exclusive option to purchase the hotel at a price based upon the project’s actual original cost of $7.7 million, reduced by the cumulative principal payments made by the Company during the lease term.  At December 31, 2015,2016, such net amount was $6.2$5.7 million. Upon expiration of the lease term, if we have not yet exercised our option to purchase the hotel, tower, either (i) the Landlord has the right to sell the hotel to us, or (ii) we have the option to purchase the hotel.  In either case, the purchase price is $1 plus closing costs. The Rising Star Lease Agreementlease agreement is not guaranteed by the parent company or any subsidiary other than Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC and has customary provisions in the event of a default.

On March 16, 2016, we amended the Rising Star Lease Agreement. See Footnote 15 for further information.

The future minimum lease payment schedule presented below has been adjusted for the subsequent amendment to the lease. Future minimum lease payments and the present value of such payments based on this amendment related to the capital lease, as of December 31, 2015,2016, are as follows (in thousands):
2016$592
2017654
$606
2018688
687
2019744
744
2020680
680
2021652
Thereafter4,455
3,803
Total minimum lease payments7,813
7,172
Less: amount representing interest(1,643)(1,435)
Present value of minimum lease payments$6,170
$5,737
 
8.9. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITY

In accordance with the terms of theour previous First Lien Credit Facility, we entered intohad a prepaid interest rate cap agreement with Capital One for a notional amount of $15 million at a LIBOR cap rate of 1.5%. The agreement was effective November 2, 2012 and terminated on October 1, 2014. We renewed our prepaid interest rate cap agreement with Capital One, effective October 1, 2014, for a notional amount of $14.75 million at a LIBOR cap rate of 1.5%. This agreement terminatesexpired on June 29, 2016.  Any future settlements resulting from theThe Company currently does not have and is not required to maintain a prepaid interest rate cap will be recognized in interest expense during the period in which the change occurs.

9. BOARD AND EXECUTIVE TRANSITION COSTSaccordance with its current First Lien Credit Facility.

On October 9, 2014, we received a Preliminary Consent Solicitation Statement (the “Preliminary Solicitation”) from the Shareholder Group to call a special meeting of shareholders for the purpose, among other things, of nominating certain individuals to our board of directors and amending certain of the Company’s by-laws. On October 21, 2014, our board amended Article I, Section 2 of our by-laws. See Exhibit 3.2 as set forth in "Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules” for a copy of our amended and restated by-laws effective as of October 21, 2014.  On October 22, 2014, our board of directors authorized management to hire an investment bank to explore its alternatives, including the potential sale of the Company.
On October 28, 2014, the Shareholder Group filed a Definitive Consent Solicitation Statement (the “Solicitation”) which had been approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission for distribution.

On November 28, 2014, Full House and the Shareholder Group entered into the Settlement Agreement. In conjunction with such activities, we incurred fees during 2014 of $1 million, which included $0.5 million of legal fees and $0.2 million as reimbursement for a portion of the Shareholder Group's expenses.


64



Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things:
The size of our board of directors was increased from five to nine members, creating four vacancies on the board of directors.
We accepted the resignation of Andre M. Hilliou and Mark J. Miller as directors, effective November 28, 2014, resulting in two additional vacancies on the board of directors.
W.H. Baird Garrett, Raymond Hemmig, Ellis Landau, Daniel R. Lee, Bradley M. Tirpak and Craig W. Thomas (the “Shareholder Group Nominees”) were appointed by the board of directors to fill the six vacancies each subject to normal and customary state licensing requirements. Pursuant to the Amended Settlement Agreement (see below), Mr. Hemmig subsequently resigned, leaving the current size of the board of directors at eight members.
At our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2015 Annual Meeting”), we nominated Kenneth R. Adams, Carl G. Braunlich, Kathleen Marshall and each of the Shareholder Group Nominees, with the exception of Mr. Hemmig, to the board of directors.
The Shareholder Group irrevocably withdrew its Solicitation, and agreed to immediately cease all efforts related to the Solicitation.
Through the end of our 2016 meeting of the stockholders (or an earlier date upon the occurrence of certain events), each member of the Shareholder Group has agreed to certain customary standstill restrictions.
The Company and the Shareholder Group agreed to a mutual release of claims, including those arising in respect of, or in connection with, the Solicitation.
We agreed to reimburse the Shareholder Group for actual out-of-pocket expenses in the aggregate amount of up to $215,000 incurred in connection with the Solicitation.

Andre M. Hilliou resigned as a director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective November 28, 2014. Pursuant to a Separation Agreement entered into between Mr. Hilliou and the Company (the “Hilliou Separation Agreement”), it was agreed that Mr. Hilliou’s employment with the Company would be terminated at a future date, subject to the Company using its best efforts to comply with its covenants under the Company’s existing credit facilities.  Mark J. Miller resigned as a director and Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective November 28, 2014. Pursuant to a Separation Agreement entered into between Mr. Miller and the Company (the “Miller Separation Agreement” and together with the Hilliou Separation Agreement, the “Separation Agreements”), it was agreed that Mr. Miller’s employment would be terminated at a future date, subject to the Company using its best efforts to comply with its covenants under the Company’s existing credit facilities.  On January 9, 2015 (the “Resignation Date”), in conjunction with the amendment of our existing credit facilities, Mr. Hilliou’s and Mr. Miller’s employment was terminated. Pursuant to the Separation Agreements, (i) all outstanding Company restricted stock held by Messrs. Hilliou and Miller (constituting 60,000 shares of common stock held by each) accelerated and vested in full on the Resignation Date and (ii) in connection with their terminations of employment, Messrs. Hilliou and Miller received cash severance payments of $644,724 and $599,830, respectively, as well as company-paid continued healthcare coverage to the earlier of December 31, 2015 or the date that such executive is covered by another employer’s comparable health plan.
On November 28, 2014, we entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Lee pursuant to which Mr. Lee serves as our Chief Executive Officer.

On January 28, 2015, we entered into that certain First Amendment to Settlement Agreement (the "Amended Settlement Agreement"), which modified portions of the Settlement Agreement. The Amended Settlement Agreement eliminated the requirement that Mr. Hemmig be nominated and elected to the Board, and acknowledged the reduction in the size of the Board from nine (9) to eight (8) Directors.

10. SETTLEMENTS AND TERMINATED PROJECTS

Property Tax Assessments and Settlement Agreement.Assessments. In September 2015, the Company agreed to settle its real property tax assessment appeal for the tax years 2011 through 2014 with respect to the Rising Star Casino Resort. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Ohio County paid the Company a tax refund of $1,352,937, which was received during the fourth quarter of 2015. In exchange, the Company dismissed its appeals pending before the Ohio County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals. In addition, the parties have agreed to a final determination of the Company's real property tax assessment for the tax year 2015 and to certain parameters affecting the calculation of the real property assessment for the tax years 2016 and 2017. The refund was recorded during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and included in selling, general and administrative expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


65



Nambe Pueblo Settlement Agreement.Pueblo. In July 2015, the Company reached a settlement with the Nambe Pueblo tribe related to $662,000 previously advanced by the Company as part of a development agreement and a security and reimbursement agreement from 2005. The advance had been fully reserved since 2011.

In consideration for the release of any future claims and other items as defined within the settlement agreement, Nambe Pueblo agreed to pay $500,000 towhich the Company in two installments of $250,000. The first installment was received on July 31, 2015, and the final installment was due upon the earlier of the opening of the Nambe Pueblo casino or December 31, 2015. In February and March 2016, Nambe Pueblo remitted a total of $200,000. The Company expects to receive the remaining $50,000 by March 31, 2016, and estimates the entire amount as collectible.has received. The Company also incurred a $50,000 collection fee payable upon the


receipt of the proceeds. The net expected recovery was recognized as a change in estimate in the quarter ended June 30,during 2015 and was included in selling, general and administrative expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Indiana Department of Revenue. During 2014, we received a proposed assessment of $1.6 million, including interest and penalties, from the Indiana Department of Revenue (“IDOR”) related to unpaid sales and use taxes for periods prior to 2013, which we protested. In April 2015, we withdrew our formal protest with the IDOR and accepted the IDOR’s revised audit findings and proposed assessment. The revised assessment totaled $237,000, including interest and penalties, which approximated our estimate and was remitted in April 2015.

Majestic Star. On March 21, 2014, we entered into an agreement with the The Majestic Star Casino LLC ("Majestic Star") to acquire all of the outstanding membership interests of Majestic Mississippi, LLC (“Majestic Mississippi”), which operates a casino located in Tunica, Mississippi commonly known as the Fitz Tunica Casino & Hotel.  On June 23, 2014, the agreement was terminated and on August 21, 2014, we settled all disputes related to this unconsummated matter by forfeiting $1.7 million in deposits. We also incurred $0.9 million of acquisition related fees for this transaction, including $0.6 million of aborted registration costs associated with the attempted financing of the purchase.
In November 2014, the Company reached an agreement with one of its advisors on the Majestic Mississippi transaction. The advisor agreed to reimburse the Company $0.25 million which was included as a reimbursement of fees incurred in conjunction with the advisor’s services to the Company during 2014.
Keeneland Association, Inc.  On February 26, 2014, we entered into an exclusivity agreement with Keeneland Association, Inc. (“Keeneland”) to own, manage, and operate instant racing and, if authorized, traditional casino gaming at racetracks in Kentucky, subject to completion of definitive documents for each opportunity. On November 17, 2014, both parties agreed to terminate such agreements. The Company was reimbursed $0.2 million of costs incurred in connection with the matter.

11. INCOME TAXES

The income tax benefitsprovision (benefit) attributable to our loss before income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2016 2015
Current:Federal$(631) $(3,436)Federal$
 $(631)
State(62) 379
State
 (62)
 (693) (3,057) 
 (693)
    
Deferred:Federal600
 7,925
Federal(1,383) 275
State12
 1,119
State(505) (185)
Increase in valuation allowance(261) (6,975)Increase in valuation allowance2,518
 261
 351
 2,069
 630
 351
 $(342)
$(988) $630

$(342)
 

66



A reconciliation of the federal income tax statutory rate and the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Percent Amount Percent AmountPercent Amount Percent Amount
Federal income tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate34.0 % $(564) 35.0 % $(7,641)34.0 % $(1,518) 34.0 % $(564)
State taxes, net of federal benefit7.8 % (129) 2.6 % (570)7.5 % (333) 7.8 % (129)
Change in valuation allowance(15.7)% 261
 (31.9)% 6,975
(56.5)% 2,518
 (15.7)% 261
Permanent differences(7.3)% 121
 (0.4)% 92
(2.1)% 95
 (7.3)% 121
Credits5.5 % (91) 
 
2.9 % (129) 5.5 % (91)
Adjustments to beginning deferred balances(3.7)% 60
 (0.2)% 42
Other % 
 (0.6)% 114
0.1 % (3) (3.7)% 60
20.6 % $(342) 4.5 % $(988)(14.1)% $630
 20.6 % $(342)
 


Our deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,December 31,
2015 20142016 2015
Deferred tax assets:      
Deferred compensation$230
 $238
$655
 $230
Depreciation of fixed assets52
 91
42
 52
Intangible assets and amortization7,284
 7,249
6,830
 7,284
Net operating loss carry-forwards1,384
 
2,861
 1,384
Accrued expenses441
 642
1,077
 441
Allowance for doubtful accounts47
 199
19
 47
Other134
 29
Credits220
 91
Common stock warrant liability263
 
Charitable contribution carry-forward90
 43
Valuation allowance(7,236) (6,975)(9,753) (7,236)
2,336
 1,473
2,304
 2,336
Deferred tax liabilities: 
  
 
  
Depreciation of fixed assets(772) (455)(631) (772)
Amortization of indefinite lived intangibles(1,276) (926)
Amortization of indefinite-lived intangibles(1,907) (1,276)
Prepaid expenses(1,085) (772)(1,055) (1,085)
Effect of state taxes on future federal returns(391) (200)(585) (391)
Other(88) (46)(33) (88)
(3,612) (2,399)(4,211) (3,612)
$(1,276)
$(926)$(1,907)
$(1,276)
 
As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had a gross federal net operating loss carry-forward ("NOL") of $3.1$5.8 million and state tax carry-forwards of $4.8$14.2 million, all of which can be carried forward 20 years and begin to expire after 2035. We also have general business credits of $0.1$0.2 million which begin to expire after 2035.

TheGoodwill impairment charges recorded in 2014prior years have resulted in a significant amount of deferred tax assets. In assessing our ability to realize ourthe realizability of the Company's deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is “more likely than not” that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We considerconsidered the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Our assessmentWe evaluated this, plus all otherboth positive and negative evidence in determining the need for a valuation allowance. We assessedcontinue to assess the realizability of deferred tax assets and have concluded that we have not met the "more likely than not" threshold. As a result, during 2014, a valuation allowance of $7 million was recorded against federal and certain state deferred tax assets, which also resulted in a tax rate substantially below statutory rates.  AsAccordingly, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we continue to provide a valuation allowance against our remaining deferred tax assets after being utilized by deferred tax liabilities for all jurisdictions. The impairment charges and the valuation reserve against deferred tax assets havehas no effect on the actual taxes paid or owed by the Company.


67



As of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, we had $1.3$1.9 million and $0.9$1.3 million, respectively, of deferred tax liabilities relating to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles for which the timing of the reversal is not determinable and, therefore, does not assure the realization of deferred tax assets or reduce the need for a valuation allowance.

Our 2014 federalThe Company’s utilization of NOL and the general business tax return resultedcredit carry-forwards may be subject to an annual limitation under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (IRC), and similar state provisions’ due to ownership changes that may have occurred or that could occur in athe future. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL and tax loss which we electedcredit carryforwards that can be utilized annually to carry-back tooffset future taxable income earned during 2012and tax, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Sections 382 and 383, results from transactions increasing ownership of certain stockholders or public groups in accordance with IRS rules. This carry-back resulted inthe stock of the corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. While the Company has not completed an incomeIRC Section 382/383 analysis to determine if there are any annual limitations on the utilization of NOLs and tax refund of $3.7 million during 2015.

When accounting for uncertain tax positions, accounting standards requirecredit carryforwards, the Company does not believe that tax positions be assessed using a two-step process. A tax position is recognized if it meets a “more likely than not” threshold. It is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that isthere have been greater than 50% likely of being realized. Uncertain tax positions must be reviewed at each balance sheet date. It is our policy to recognize penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefitsownership change in the provision for income taxes. last three years that would prohibit the Company from utilizing all of its tax attributes.
Management has made an annual analysis of its state and federal tax returns and concluded that the Company has no recordable liability, as of December 31, 20152016 or 2014,2015, for unrecognized tax benefits as a result of uncertain tax positions taken.



As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations for the tax years 20122013 through 2015.2016. In addition, the Company is subject to state and local income tax examinations for various tax years in the taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The nature of our operating leases includesIn addition to the following as summarized below:

Leased propertyExpiration
Grand Lodge Casino facilityAugust 2023
Land lease of Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel siteApril 2058

Additionally,significant leases, we have less significant operating leases for our corporate offices and othercertain office and warehouse facilities, office equipment, signage and land.

RentSilver Slipper Casino Land Lease through April 2058 and Options to Purchase. In 2004, our subsidiary, Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC, entered into a land lease with Cure Land Company, LLC for approximately 31 acres of marshlands and a seven-acre parcel on which the Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel is situated. The land lease includes base monthly payments of $77,500 plus contingent rents of 3% of gross gaming revenue (as defined) in excess of $3.65 million in any given month. We recognized $1.3 million of rent expense, for all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2015including $0.3 million of contingent rents, during 2016, and December 31, 2014 was $3.1$1.2 million and $2.9of rent expense, including $0.2 million respectively.of contingent rents, during 2015.

The Company was obligatedland lease also includes an exclusive option to purchase the leased land (“Purchase Option”) after February 26, 2019 through October 1, 2027, for $15.5 million plus a retained interest in Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel’s operations of 3% of net income (as defined), for 10 years from the purchase date. In the event that Full House sells or transfers (i) substantially all of the assets of Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC, or (ii) its membership interests in Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC in its entirety, the purchase price will increase to $17.1 million plus the retained interest for 10 years mentioned above. In either case, we also have an option to purchase only a four-acre portion of the leased land for $2 million, which may be exercised at any time in conjunction with the development of a hotel and which accordingly reduces the purchase price of the remaining land by $2 million.

Bronco Billy's Lease through January 2035 and Option to Purchase. Bronco Billy's leases certain parking lots and buildings, including a portion of the hotel and casino, under non-cancellable operating leasesa long-term lease. The lease terms include an initial expiration date of January 2017, current rents of $18,500 per month, and six renewal options in three-year increments to make future minimum2035. Bronco Billy's exercised its first renewal option through January 2020, which increases the monthly rents to $25,000 for the first two years of the renewal period and $30,000 for the third year. The lease payments as follows (in thousands):also contains a requirement for Bronco Billy's to pay the property taxes and certain other costs associated with the leased property, a $7.6 million purchase option exercisable at any time during the lease and a right of first refusal.
2016$2,722
20172,969
20183,115
20193,074
20203,058
Thereafter40,330
 $55,268

Grand Lodge Casino Lease.Lease through August 2023.  Our subsidiary, Gaming Entertainment (Nevada), LLC, has a lease with Hyatt Equities, L.L.C. ("Hyatt") to operate the Grand Lodge Casino through August 31, 2023.Casino.  The lease as amended on December 16, 2015 (and effective as of November 25, 2015), is secured by the Company’s interests under the lease and property as defined and is subordinate to the liens in the First and Second Lien Credit Facilities. Hyatt has an option, beginning January 1, 2019, to purchase our leasehold interest and related operating assets of the Grand Lodge Casino subject to assumption of applicable liabilities. The option price is an amount equal to the Grand Lodge Casino’s positive working capital, plus Grand Lodge Casino’s earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for the twelve-month12-month period preceding the acquisition (or pro-rated if less than twelve12 months remain on the lease), plus the fair market value of the Grand Lodge Casino’s personal property. The lease has a renewal option, subject to mutual agreement, for an additional five-year term. Monthly rent will increase from $125,000 to

68



(i) $145,833 commencing on January 1, 2017 (or the date which Hyatt's renovations are completed as described below, whichever is later), and (ii) $166,667 commencing on January 1, 2018. As a condition of the amended lease, the Company is required to purchase new gaming devices and equipment or make other capital expenditures at its sole cost and expense up toof approximately $1.5 million and Hyatt is required to renovate the casino at its sole cost and expense up toof approximately $3.5 million, with both parties completing these renovations by FebruaryJune 30, 2017.

We recognized $1.9 million and $1.5 million of rent expense related to this lease in each ofduring 2016 and 2015, and 2014.respectively.

Additionally, we entered intoWe also have an agreement with Hyatt to rent a villa which includes four rooms, for use by our designated casino guests. The agreement commencesguests which commenced on June 1, 20162016. The villa is a free-standing building and consists of two, two-bedroom suites. The agreement includes monthly payments of $41,667, a six-month termination notification clause which may be exercised by either party, and a maturity date of August 31, 2023, or earlier as defined.set forth therein.

Silver Slipper Casino Land LeaseCorporate Office Lease. In August 2016, the Company executed a lease for 4,479 square feet of office space in Las Vegas, Nevada, replacing our existing office space lease which matures in May 2018. The lease terms include a maturity date of 7.6 years and Options to Purchase. In 2004, our subsidiary, Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC, entered into a land lease with Cure Land Company, LLC for approximately 31 acres of marshlands and a seven-acre parcel on which the Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel is situated (the "Silver Slipper Land Lease"). The Silver Slipper Land Lease includes base monthly payments of $77,500 plus contingent rents of 3% of gross gaming revenue (as defined in the Silver Slipper Land Lease) in excess of $3.65 million. We recognized $1.2 million of rent expense, including $0.2 million of contingent rents,annual rents. The lease also includes a tenant improvement allowance of $0.2 million. We anticipate occupying the new offices during 2017.



Rent expense for all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $3.6 million and $1$3.1 million, of rent expense, including $0.06 million of contingent rents, during 2014.respectively.

The Silver Slipper Land Lease includes an exclusive optionCompany was obligated under non-cancellable operating leases to purchase the leased land (“Purchase Option”) after February 26, 2019 through October 1, 2027, for $15.5 million plus a retained interest in Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel’s operations of 3% of net income (as defined in the Silver Slipper Land Lease), for ten years from the purchase date. In the event that Full House sells or transfers (i) substantially all of the assets of Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC, or (ii) its membership interests in Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC in its entirety, the purchase price will increase to $17.1 million plus the retained interest for ten years mentioned above. In either case, we also have an option to purchase only a four-acre portion of the leased land for $2 million, which may be exercised at any time in conjunction with the development of a hotel and which accordingly reduces the purchase price of the remaining land by $2 million. The current term of the landmake future minimum lease is through April 30, 2058.payments as follows (in thousands):

Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel Pending Acquisition

On September 27, 2015, through our wholly-owned subsidiary FHR-Colorado LLC, we entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement to acquire the operating assets and assume certain liabilities of Bronco Billy's in Cripple Creek, Colorado for a purchase price of $30 million, subject to an adjustment for working capital. The transaction is not subject to a financing or due diligence condition, though we performed substantial due diligence prior to execution of the purchase and sale agreement. The Company made a $2.5 million deposit which would be forfeited under most circumstances if the transaction is not consummated. The Bronco Billy's Purchase Agreement may be terminated by Pioneer Group if the closing has not taken place by May 14, 2016, which includes extensions of up to four 30-day periods that we may exercise to obtain required gaming approvals. The fourth extension period requires us to increase our deposit by $100,000 by April 14, 2016.

We intend to finance the acquisition concurrent with the refinancing of our outstanding first and second lien debt. The Company expects to complete its refinancing and close on the pending acquisition in the second quarter of 2016, subject to obtaining the remaining required regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.
See Footnote 15 for further information.

American Place Proposal

In August 2015, we responded to a "request for proposal" (RFP) by the Indianapolis Airport Authority with a proposal for a $650 million lifestyle complex, anchored by a modest-sized casino, known as "American Place". Under our proposal, we would act as the "master developer" (as such term is used in the RFP) of the project and plan to seek partners for many of its aspects. The project is contingent, amongst other things, on being selected by the Indianapolis Airport Authority, on changes in the state gaming laws and other regulatory approvals that would allow the relocation to Indianapolis of approximately half of the gaming devices that are licensed to operate in Rising Sun, Indiana, and on obtaining financing for the proposed project. There is no certainty that our proposal will be selected or, if selected, that the proposed project will become a reality.
2017$3,258
20183,615
20193,590
20203,250
20213,117
Thereafter37,703
 $54,533

Litigation

In 2013 and 2014, we expended approximately $1.6 million repairingto repair defects to the parking garage at the Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel. The parking garage was originally built in 2007, and we acquired the property in 2012. We hired outside legal counsel to pursue the reimbursement of such costs from the contractor and architect, who neglected to install certain structural elements required by the building codes. During the third quarter of 2015, the case was dismissed in favor of the defendants, as the statutes

69



of repose had expired and,expired. We filed an appeal on November 2, 2015 on the basis that there were elements in the judge's opinion, we had failed to prove elementscase that would have extended our right to seek reimbursement of the remedial costs. We filed an appeal on November 2, 2015. On November 25, 2015, we entered into a settlement and release agreement with the architect, and on January 12, 2016, we filed an appellate brief in the US DistrictU.S. Court of Appeals 5thfor the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit") with respect to our litigation with the contractor. On August 31, 2016, oral arguments were heard in the Fifth Circuit and on January 6, 2017, the Fifth Circuit reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case back to the District Court for trial.  On January 20, 2017, the contractor filed a petition for rehearing in the Fifth Circuit, which was denied on February 7, 2017. The Company expects a trial to be set during the third or fourth quarter of 2017. During March 2017, the Company filed a lawsuit against the contractor's insurance company.

Additionally, weWe are party to a number of pending legal proceedings which occurred in the normal course of business.  Management does not expect that the outcome of such proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain of its key employees. The agreements may provide the employee with a base salary, bonus, restricted stock grants, stock options and other customary benefits. Certain agreements also provide for severance in the event the employee resigns with “good reason,” or the employee is terminated without “cause” or due to a “change of control,” as defined in the agreements. The severance amounts vary with the terms of the agreements and may include the acceleration and vesting of certain unvested shares and stock-based awards upon a change of control, along with continuation of insurance costs and certain other benefits.

Defined Contribution Pension Plan

We sponsor a defined contribution pension plan for all eligible employees providing for voluntary contributions by eligible employees and matching contributions made by us.  Matching contributions made by us were $0.3 million for each of 20152016 and 2014,2015, excluding nominal administrative expenses assumed. During 2014,For 2016 and 2015, the Company changed itsCompany's employer contribution rate towas 50% up to 4% of compensation for each participating employee, from 100% of the first 3% of compensation, plus 50% of the next 2% of compensation for each participating employee.compensation.

Liquidity, Concentrations and Economic Risks and Uncertainties

We are economically dependent upon relatively few investments in the gaming industry.  Future operations could be affected by adverse economic conditions and increased competition, particularly in those areas and their key feeder markets in neighboring states. The effects and duration of these conditions and related risks and uncertainties on our future operations and cash flows, including our access to capital or credit financing, cannot be estimated at this time, but may be significant.



The Company carries cash on deposit with financial institutions that may be in excess of federally-insured limits. However, theThe extent of any loss that might be incurred as a result of uninsured deposits in the event of a future failure of a bank or other financial institution, if any, is not subject to estimation at this time.

13. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

On August 15, 2016, the Company announced a $5 million rights offering. A registration statement on Form S-3 relating to these securities was declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 6, 2016. The rights offering commenced on October 7, 2016 and the Company distributed, at no charge, non-transferable subscription rights to the holders of the Company's common stock as of August 25, 2016.

The Company closed on its rights offering on November 10, 2016. The Company received a total of $5 million of gross proceeds (or $4.64 million of net proceeds after offering costs) from the rights offering through the issuance of 3,846,154 shares of common stock at a price of $1.30 per share. The net proceeds from the rights offering are intended to be used to partially fund certain capital expenditure growth projects at our existing properties, as well as for general corporate purposes.

Of the 3,846,154 shares issued in connection with the rights offering, Daniel R. Lee, Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of the Company, purchased 1,000,000 shares as the standby purchaser in connection with the standby purchase agreement that the Company entered into with Mr. Lee on October 7, 2016. Mr. Lee (i) agreed to hold such shares for a minimum period, (ii) received reimbursement of his legal fees, (iii) received a priority right to purchase the first 1,000,000 shares that remained after shareholders exercised their basic subscription rights, and (iv) received registration rights from the Company with respect to such purchased shares. Mr. Lee received no fee for providing the standby purchase agreement.
14. SHARE-BASED BENEFIT PLANSCOMPENSATION

2015 Equity Incentive Plan. On March 31, 2015, our board of directors adopted the Full House Resorts, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). Our stockholders approved the 2015 Plan on May 5, 2015, terminating our Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2006 Plan"). The 2015 Plan includes shares reserved for issuance of up to 1,400,000 new shares to directors, employees and consultants and allows for a variety of forms of awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents and performance-based compensation. Stock option awards have maximum 10-year terms and all awards issued thus far vest on an accelerated basis if there is a change in control of the Company, unless the awards are assumed by the successor as defined.

OnIn May 5, 2015, members2016, the Company issued stock options to purchase 420,000 shares of our board of directors were issued 92,715 shares of restricted common stock as partial payment for their service as directors, andto various employees of the Company, were granted 320,000 stock options withall of which have an exercise price of $1.51,$1.70 per share, a price higher than the Company's closing price on the day of grant. These stock options all vest in equal amounts over three years from the date of grant. As a part of its compensation package for serving on the Company's board of directors, the Company also issued stock options to purchase 74,116 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.70 per share on the grant date. The stock options havesubject to a three yearone-year vesting period, and vest ratably each year.49,413 shares of common stock, which vested immediately, to Full House board members. As of December 31, 2015,2016, we had 987,285443,756 share-based awards available for grant from the 2015 Plan.

In November 2014,Prior to the adoption of the 2015 Plan and outside of the 2006 Plan, in order to recruit our executive officers, we issued 943,834 non-qualified stock options to Daniel R. Lee, our President and Chief Executive Officer was granted 943,834 nonqualifiedand President, and 300,000 non-qualified stock options. In January 2015,options to Lewis Fanger, our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, was granted 300,000 nonqualified stock options. Each grant was effected outside the 2015 Plan and in connection with their employment.Treasurer. Messrs. Lee and Fanger's stock options will vestvested with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of their respective grant dates, and will continue to vest with respect to an additional 1/48th of the shares on each monthly anniversary thereafter.


70



In conjunction with the Settlement Agreement on November 28, 2014 related to the transition of the Company's Board and Executives (Note 9), the remaining shares of unvested restricted stock under our 2006 Plan vested as of such date.

Stock Options. The following table summarizes information related to our common stock options:
Number
of Stock
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
Aggregate Instrinsic Value
Number
of Stock
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
Aggregate Instrinsic Value
Options outstanding at January 1, 2015943,834
 $1.25
  
Options outstanding at January 1, 20161,563,834
 $1.33
  
Granted620,000
 $1.44
  494,116
 $1.70
  
Exercised
 
  
 
  
Canceled/Forfeited
 
  
 
  
Options outstanding at December 31, 20151,563,834
 $1.33
9.05$537,610
Options exercisable at December 31, 2015235,959
 $1.25
8.91$99,103
Options outstanding at December 31, 20162,057,950
 $1.42
8.38$2,025,090
Options exercisable at December 31, 2016741,994
 $1.31
8.02$808,311

As of December 31, 2015, 235,9592016, 741,994 stock options had vested, the remainder were unvested, and none of the unvested options are estimated to be forfeited.

As of December 31, 2015,2016, there was approximately $0.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted by the Company. This unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.831.88 years.

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $1.44 and $1.25 per share.

Compensation Cost.  We recognized compensationCompensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the yearsperiods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0.4 million and 2014,$0.3 million, respectively. Share-based compensation expense isThese costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the awards net of estimated forfeitures and are included in selling, general and administrative expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Costs associated with accelerating the vesting of shares associated with the termination of Mr. Hilliou’s and Mr. Miller’s employment, as described in Note 9, is included in board and executive transition costs on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We estimated the fair value of each stock option award on the grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, and changes in assumptions used can materially affect the fair value estimate. Option valuation weighted-average assumptions were as follows:

For the year ended December 31,For the year ended December 31,
201520142016 2015
Expected volatility51.3%60.0%43.87% 51.3%
Expected dividend yield—%—% —%
Expected term (in years)4.4 years3.0 years1.85 4.4
Weighted average risk free rate1.34%0.88%1.41% 1.34%

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0.67 and $0.60 per share.

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock price. Dividend yield is based on the estimate of annual dividends expected to be paid at the time of the grant. The expected term considers the contractual term of the option as well as historical exercise and forfeiture behavior.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the rates in effect on the grant date for U.S. Treasury instruments with maturities matching the relevant expected term of the award.

14.15. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments are affected by the duration of the instruments and other factors used by market participants to estimate value. The carrying amounts for cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payables approximate their estimated fair value because of the short durations of the instruments and inconsequential rates of interest. Management also believes that the carrying value of long-term debt also approximates their estimated fair value because the terms of the facilities are representative of current market conditions. While management believes the fair value of our capitalized lease obligation approximates its fair value because certain terms of the lease were recently renegotiated, management also believes that precise estimates are not practical because of the unique nature of the relationships.



The following table presents the fair value of those assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands). There were no assets or liabilities measured on a recurring basis during 2015. See Note 7 for further information regarding our common stock warrant liability.
  December 31, 2016
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Common stock warrant liability $
 $
 $1,117
 $1,117

16. SEGMENT REPORTING

We manage our casinos based on geographic regions within the United States. The casino/resort segments includeoperations includes four segments: the Silver Slipper Casino &and Hotel in Hancock(Hancock County, Mississippi;Mississippi); Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel (Cripple Creek, Colorado); the Rising Star Casino Resort in Rising(Rising Sun, Indiana;Indiana); and the Northern Nevada segment, which consistsconsisting of the Grand Lodge Casino in Incline(Incline Village, NevadaNevada) and Stockman’s Casino in Fallon, Nevada.(Fallon, Nevada). We began including Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel on May 13, 2016, its acquisition date.

71



The Development/Management segment includes costs associated with casino-related development and management projects, including our management contract with the Pueblo of Pojoaque that expired in September 2014.

In 2015, the Company's management began utilizingutilizes Adjusted Property EBITDA as the primary profit measure for its segments. Adjusted Property EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure defined as Adjusted EBITDA before corporate-related costs and expenses that are not allocated to each property. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure defined as earnings before interest and other non-operating income (expense), taxes, depreciation and amortization, preopeningpre-opening expenses, impairment charges, asset write-offs, recoveries, gain (loss) from asset disposals, board and executive transition costs, project development and acquisition costs, and non-cash share basedshare-based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA orand Adjusted Property EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to operating income orand net income for use as an indicatorindicators of our performance; or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities for use as a measure of liquidity; or as an alternative to any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. We have significant uses of cash flows, including capital expenditures, interest payments, taxes and debt principal repayments, which are not reflected in Adjusted EBITDA and/or Adjusted Property EBITDA. Also, other companies in the gaming and hospitality industries that report Adjusted EBITDA and/or Adjusted Property EBITDA information may calculate Adjusted EBITDA or Adjusted Property EBITDA in a different manner.

The following tables reflect selected operating information for our reporting segments for the year ended December 31, 20152016 and 20142015 and include a reconciliation of Adjusted Property EBITDA to operating income (loss) and net income (loss):

Year Ended December 31, 2015 (In thousands)       
 
 
  Casino Operations
      
 Northern Nevada Rising Star Casino Resort Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel Development/ Management Corporate Consolidated
Revenues, net$20,194
 $47,557
 $56,837
 $
 $
 $124,588
            
Adjusted Property EBITDA$3,877
 $4,005
 $9,925
 $
 $
 $17,807
            
Other operating costs and expenses:           
Depreciation and amortization781
 2,714
 4,383
 
 15
 7,893
Write-offs, recoveries and asset disposals80
 
 3
 
 (446) (363)
Pre-opening costs
 
 156
 
 
 156
Corporate expenses
 
 
 
 3,843
 3,843
Project development and acquisition costs
 
 
 
 891
 891
Stock compensation
 
 
 
 343
 343
Operating income (loss)3,016
 1,291
 5,383
 
 (4,646) 5,044
Non-operating expense:           
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
 (179) (18) 
 (6,518) (6,715)
Other  11
 
   1
 12
Non-operating expense
 (168) (18) 
 (6,517) (6,703)
Income (loss) before income taxes3,016
 1,123
 5,365
 
 (11,163) (1,659)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(168) (343) 307
 
 (138) (342)
Net income (loss)$3,184
 $1,466
 $5,058
 $
 $(11,025) $(1,317)
            



72



Year Ended December 31, 2014 (In thousands)       
For the year ended December 31, 2016For the year ended December 31, 2016
(In thousands)(In thousands)
 
  Casino Operations
           
Northern Nevada Rising Star Casino Resort Silver Slipper Casino & Hotel Development/ Management Corporate Consolidated
Silver Slipper
Casino & Hotel
 Bronco Billy's Casino & Hotel 
Rising Star
Casino Resort
 Northern Nevada Corporate Consolidated
Revenues, net$21,222
 $51,110
 $48,023
 $1,066
 $
 $121,421
$59,093
 $16,220
 $49,472
 $21,207
 $
 $145,992
                      
Adjusted Property EBITDA$4,466
 $2,174
 $7,501
 $1,066
 $
 $15,207
$9,994
 $3,423
 $2,931
 $3,941
 $
 $20,289
                      
Other operating costs and expenses:                      
Depreciation and amortization857
 2,997
 5,312
 
 17
 9,183
3,308
 1,215
 2,645
 746
 14
 7,928
Impairment
 11,547
 
 
 
 11,547
Write-offs, recoveries and asset disposals
 372
 
 
 152
 524
Board and executive transition costs
 
 
 
 2,741
 2,741
Loss on asset disposals, net32
 8
 9
 295
 
 344
Corporate expenses
 
 
 
 4,506
 4,506

 
 
 
 4,105
 4,105
Project development and acquisition costs
 
 
 
 296
 296

 
 
 
 1,314
 1,314
Stock compensation
 
 
 
 248
 248

 
 
 
 409
 409
Operating income (loss)3,609
 (12,742) 2,189
 1,066
 (7,960) (13,838)6,654
 2,200
 277
 2,900
 (5,842) 6,189
Non-operating expense:           
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
 (203) (12) 
 (6,057) (6,272)
Settlement loss
       (1,700) (1,700)
Other(21) (25) (16) 
 39
 (23)
Non-operating expense (income):           
Interest expense18
 
 208
 
 9,260
 9,486
Debt modification costs
 
 
 
 624
 624
Adjustment to fair value of warrants and other
 
 
 
 543
 543
Non-operating expense(21) (228) (28) 
 (7,718) (7,995)18
 
 208
 
 10,427
 10,653
Income (loss) before income taxes3,588
 (12,970) 2,161
 1,066
 (15,678) (21,833)6,636
 2,200
 69
 2,900
 (16,269) (4,464)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes224
 (522) 222
 (23) (889) (988)
Provision for income taxes402
 209
 
 
 19
 630
Net income (loss)$3,364
 $(12,448) $1,939
 $1,089
 $(14,789) $(20,845)$6,234
 $1,991
 $69
 $2,900
 $(16,288) $(5,094)
           





For the year ended December 31, 2015
(In thousands)
      
 
Silver Slipper
Casino & Hotel
 Bronco Billy's Casino & Hotel 
Rising Star
Casino Resort
 Northern Nevada Corporate Consolidated
Revenues, net$56,836
 $
 $47,557
 $20,038
 $
 $124,431
            
Adjusted Property EBITDA$9,925
 $
 $4,005
 $3,877
 $
 $17,807
            
Other operating costs and expenses:           
Depreciation and amortization4,383
 
 2,714
 781
 15
 7,893
Write-offs, recoveries and asset disposals3
 
 
 80
 (446) (363)
Pre-opening costs156
 
 
 
 
 156
Corporate expenses
 
 
 
 3,843
 3,843
Project development and acquisition costs
 
 
 
 891
 891
Stock compensation
 
 
 
 343
 343
Operating income (loss)5,383
 
 1,291
 3,016
 (4,646) 5,044
Non-operating expense (income):           
Interest expense18
 
 179
 
 6,518
 6,715
Other
 
 (11) 
 (1) (12)
Non-operating expense18
 
 168
 
 6,517
 6,703
Income (loss) before income taxes5,365
 
 1,123
 3,016
 (11,163) (1,659)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes307
 
 (343) (168) (138) (342)
Net income (loss)$5,058
 $
 $1,466
 $3,184
 $(11,025) $(1,317)


Selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 20152016 and 20142015 is as follows:
At December 31, 2015 (In thousands)       
Casino Operations      
At December 31, 2016 (In thousands)       
Northern
Nevada
 
Rising Star
Casino
Resort
 
Silver Slipper
Casino & Hotel
 
Development/
Management
 Corporate 
 
Consolidated
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel 
Rising Star
Casino
Resort
 Northern Nevada Corporate 
 
Consolidated
Total assets$12,105
 $37,086
 $82,621
 $
 $10,958
 $142,770
$79,975
 $36,732
 $36,444
 $12,722
 $11,375
 $177,248
Property and equipment, net6,098
 31,391
 61,150
 
 343
 98,982
58,856
 16,020
 29,819
 6,202
 568
 111,465
Goodwill1,809
 
 14,671
 
 
 16,480
14,671
 4,806
 
 1,809
 
 21,286
Liabilities1,834
 9,979
 3,389
 
 71,045
 86,247
 

73



At December 31, 2014 (In thousands)       
Casino Operations      
At December 31, 2015 (In thousands)       
Northern
Nevada
 
Rising Star
Casino
Resort
 
Silver Slipper
Casino & Hotel
 
Development/
Management
 Corporate 
 
Consolidated
Silver Slipper Casino and Hotel Bronco Billy's Casino and Hotel 
Rising Star
Casino
Resort
 Northern Nevada Corporate 
 
Consolidated
Total assets$12,471
 $39,101
 $76,898
 $
 $12,474
 $140,944
$82,621
 $
 $37,141
 $12,105
 $9,600
 $141,467
Property and equipment, net6,656
 33,801
 54,548
 
 35
 95,040
61,150
 
 31,391
 6,098
 343
 98,982
Goodwill1,809
 
 14,671
 
 
 16,480
14,671
 
 
 1,809
 
 16,480
Liabilities1,970
 11,543
 4,182
 
 65,752
 83,447
 
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Bronco Billy's Colorado Approval

On February 18, 2016, the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission approved the Company for the licenses necessary for its pending acquisition of Bronco Billy’s. The Company expects to complete its refinancing and close on the pending acquisition in the second quarter of 2016, subject to obtaining the remaining required regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. There is no certainty that the acquisition will be consummated. The Bronco Billy's Purchase Agreement may be terminated by Pioneer Group if the closing has not taken place by May 14, 2016, which includes extensions of up to four 30-day periods we may exercise to obtain required gaming approvals. We have exercised three of our four 30-day extensions, with the fourth extension due on April 14, 2016. The fourth extension period requires us to increase our deposit by $100,000.

First Lien Credit Facility Amendment

Effective March 11, 2016, we entered into the First Lien 6th Amendment to the First Lien Credit Facility, which extended the maturity date for the First Lien Credit Facility from October 1, 2016 to April 1, 2017.

Rising Star Casino Resort Capital Lease Amendment

On March 16, 2016, our Indiana subsidiary, Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC, entered into the first amendment to its capital lease agreement with Rising Sun/Ohio County First, Inc. The amendment extended the initial term of the lease by four years to October 1, 2027, modified the rent payment schedule, and shall cause Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC to make a minimum of $1 million of capital improvements for the benefit of Rising Star Casino Resort, as defined, by March 31, 2017. The modified rents will be reduced from $77,537 per month as follows: (i) to $48,537 per month from April 2016 through March 2017, (ii) to $56,537 per month from April 2017 through March 2018; (iii) to $57,537 per month from April 2018 through March 2019; and (iv) to $63,537 per month from April 2019 through March 2020. Beginning April 1, 2020 through the end of the lease, the scheduled monthly payment shall be $54,326. An annual interest rate of 4.5% was applied to the payment schedule from October 1, 2017 through the lease expiration.




74



Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of December 31, 2015,2016, we completed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at a reasonable assurance level in timely alerting them to material information relating to us which is required to be included in our periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Evaluation of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) as of December 31, 2015.2016. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2015,2016, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

There have been no changes during the quarter ended December 31, 20152016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.


75




PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by this Item will be set forth under the captions “Proposal One: Election“Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and elsewhere in the definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of December 31, 20152016 (our “Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this Item will be set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation” and elsewhere in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by this Item will be set forth under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Compensation - Equity Compensation Plan Information” and elsewhere in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this Item will be set forth under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Independence of Directors” and elsewhere in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this Item will be set forth under the caption “Proposal Two: Ratification“Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and elsewhere in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.


76




PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Financial statements of the Company (including related Notes to consolidated financial statements) included herein under Item 8 of Part II hereof are listed below:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014;2015;
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014;2015;
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014;2015;
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014;2015;
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b) Exhibits
Exhibit Number Description
2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Grand Victoria Casino & Resort, L.P. and Full House Resorts, Inc., dated as of September 10, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2010)
 
2.2 Equity Purchase Agreement dated March 30, 2012 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc.; Firekeepers Development Authority, an unincorporated instrumentality and political subdivision of the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians; RAM Entertainment, LLC and Robert A. Mathewson. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on May 8, 2012)
 
2.3 Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and between the Sellers named therein, Full House Resorts, Inc. and Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, dated as of March 30, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.01 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2012)
 
2.4 Interest Purchase Agreement by and among The Majestic Star Casino, LLC, Majestic Mississippi, LLC, and Full House Resorts, Inc., dated as of March 21, 2014. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2014.)
 
2.5 Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2015, between Pioneer Group, Inc. and FHR-Colorado LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant's Form 8-K/A (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on October 5, 2015)
   
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as amended to date. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on May 9, 2011)
 
3.2 Amended and Restated By-lawsBy-Laws of Full House Resorts, Inc., effective as amended on October 21, 2014of May 10, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.1 to the Registrant’s Annual ReportForm 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on May 13, 2016)
4.1Specimen Certificate for Shares of Full House Resorts, Inc.'s Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10-K asS-3 filed withon August 15, 2016)
4.2Specimen Certificate for Common Stock Subscription Rights of Full House Resorts, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Securities and Exchange CommissionRegistrant’s Form S-3/A filed on March 26, 2015)September 16, 2016)
4.3Instructions for use of Common Stock Subscription Rights Certificates of Full House Resorts, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-3/A filed on September 16, 2016)
 
10.1+ Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan (Effective as of April 26, 2011). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement as(SEC File No. 1-32583) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2011)
 
10.2+ 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (Effective as of May 5, 2015) (Incorporated by reference to Attachment A to Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on April 3, 2015)
   
10.3+ Form of Restricted Stock Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.75 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2006)
    
10.4+Employment Agreement, dated July 17, 2007, between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Andre Hilliou. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20, 2007)
10.5+Employment Agreement, dated July 17, 2007, between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Mark J. Miller. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 20, 2007)

77




10.6+Letter Agreement dated November 12, 2012, between Full House Resorts, Inc. and T. Wesley Elam. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2012)
10.7+Employment Agreement, dated December 7, 2012, between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Deborah J. Pierce. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2013)
10.810.4 Casino Operations Lease dated June 28, 2011 by and between Hyatt Equities, L.L.C. and Gaming Entertainment (Nevada) LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2011)
 
10.910.5 Asset Purchase and Transition Agreement dated June 28, 2011 by and between HCC Corporation, doing business as Grand Lodge Casino, and Gaming Entertainment (Nevada) LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2011)
 
10.1010.6 First Lien Credit Agreement dated as of June 29, 2012, by and among Full House Resorts, Inc. as borrower, the Lenders named therein and Capital One, National Association as Administrative Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2012)
 
10.1110.7 Second Lien Credit Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, by and among Full House Resorts, Inc. as borrower, the Lenders named therein and ABC Funding, LLC as Administrative Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2012)
 
10.1210.8 Lease Agreement with Option to Purchase dated as of November 17, 2004, by and between Cure Land Company, LLC, as landlord, and Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, as tenant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2013)
 
10.1310.9 First Amendment to Lease Agreement with Option to Purchase dated as of March 13, 2009, by and between Cure Land Company, LLC, as landlord, and Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, as tenant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2013)
   
10.1410.10 Second Amendment to Lease Agreement with Option to Purchase dated as of September 26, 2012, by and between Cure Land Company, LLC, as landlord, and Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, as tenant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2013)
    
10.1510.11 Third Amendment to Lease Agreement with Option to Purchase dated as of February 26, 2013, by and between Cure Land Company, LLC, as landlord, and Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, as tenant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2013)
   
10.1610.12

 First Amendment to Casino Operations Lease dated April 8, 2013 by and between Hyatt Equities, L.L.C. and Gaming Entertainment (Nevada) LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the SEC on April 11, 2013)
    
10.1710.13 Second Amendment to Casino Operations Lease effective as of November 25, 2015, by and between Gaming Entertainment (Nevada) LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, and Hyatt Equities, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the SEC on December 17, 2015)
    
10.1810.14Third Amendment to Casino Operations Lease, effective August 29, 2016, between Hyatt Equities, L.L.C. and Gaming Entertainment (Nevada) LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's current report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the SEC on August 30, 2016)
10.15 Hotel Lease / Purchase Agreement dated August 15, 2013 by and between Rising Sun/Ohio County First, Inc. and Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 2013)
    
10.1910.16 First Amendment to Hotel Lease / Purchase Agreement dated March 16, 2016 by and between Rising Sun/Ohio County First, Inc. and Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2016)
   

78



10.2010.17 First Amendment to First Lien Credit Agreement dated as of August 26, 2013 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent for the Lenders, as L/C Issuer and as Swing Line Lender. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30, 2013)
    


10.21
10.18 Amendment No. 1 to Second Lien Credit Agreement dated as of August 26, 2013 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and ABC Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the Lenders. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30, 2013)
   
10.2210.19 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Design-Builder dated August 26, 2013 between Silver Slipper Casino Venture, LLC and WHD Silver Slipper, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30, 2013)
    
10.2310.20 Second Amendment to First Lien Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent for the Lenders, as L/C Issuer and as Swing Line Lender. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2014)
    
10.2410.21 Amendment No. 2 to Second Lien Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and ABC Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the Lenders. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2014)
    
10.2510.22 Third Amendment to First Lien Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2015 and effective as of December 31, 2014 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent for the Lenders, as L/C Issuer and as Swing Line Lender. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2015)
    
10.2610.23 Amendment No. 3 to Second Lien Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2015 and effective as of December 31, 2014 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and ABC Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the Lenders. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2015)
    
10.2710.24 Fourth Amendment to First Lien Credit Agreement dated as of May 31, 2015, by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders from time to time parties thereto and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent for the Lenders, as L/C Issuer and as Swing Line Lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on June 4, 2015)
   
10.2810.25 Acknowledgment of First Lien Guarantors dated May 31, 2015 by and between (i) Full House Subsidiary, Inc., Full House Subsidiary II, Inc., Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC, Gaming Entertainment (Nevada) LLC, Stockman’s Casino, and Silver Slipper Casino Venture LLC, and (ii) Capital One, National Association, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Trustee for the Lender Parties (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on June 4, 2015)
   
10.2910.26 Acknowledgment of Second Lien Lenders dated May 31, 2015 executed by ABC Funding, LLC as administrative agent and collateral trustee for the Second Lien Lenders (defined below) listed in that certain Second Lien Credit Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, as amended, by and among the Company, as borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto (the “Second Lien Lenders”) and ABC Funding, LLC as administrative agent for the Second Lien Lenders (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on June 4, 2015)
   
10.3010.27 Fifth Amendment to First Lien Credit Agreement dated as of August 5, 2015 and effective as of June 30, 2015 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders from time to time parties thereto and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent for the Lenders, as L/C Issuer and as Swing Line Lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on August 10, 2015)
   
10.3110.28 Amendment No. 4 to Second Lien Agreement dated as of August 5, 2015 and effective as of June 30, 2015 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders named therein and ABC Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the Lenders (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on August 10, 2015)
   
10.3210.29 Sixth Amendment to First Lien Credit Agreement dated as of March 11, 2016 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the Lenders from time to time parties thereto and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent for the Lenders, as L/C Issuer and as Swing Line Lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on March 15, 2016)
10.30Amended and Restated First Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2016, among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto, and Capital One Bank, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K/A (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on May 18, 2016).

79




10.31Amended and Restated Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2016, among Full House Resorts, Inc., as borrower, the lenders from time to time parties thereto, and ABC Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K/A (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on May 18, 2016).
10.32Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2016, among Full House Resorts, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 8-K/A (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on May 18, 2016)
   
10.33 Joinder Agreement to the First Lien Guaranty Agreement by Robert and Louise Johnson, LLC in favor of Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent for the Lender Parties, dated as of June 30, 2015(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on August 10, 2015)
   
10.34 Joinder Agreement to the Second Lien Guaranty Agreement by and between Robert and Louise Johnson, LLC and ABC Funding, LLC, as administrative agent for the Lender Parties, dated as of June 30, 2015(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on August 10, 2015)
10.35 Settlement Agreement dated as of August 21, 2014 by and among Majestic Star Casino, LLC, Majestic Mississippi, LLC and Full House Resorts, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2014)
    
10.36 Settlement Agreement dated November 28, 2014 by and among Full House Resorts, Inc., Daniel R. Lee, Bradley M. Tirpak, and Craig W. Thomas. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2014)
    
10.37+

 Employment Agreement dated as of November 28, 2014 by and between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Daniel R. Lee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2014)
    
10.38+

 Inducement Stock Option Agreement dated November 28, 2014 by and between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Daniel R. Lee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K8-K(SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2014)
    
10.39+

 Employment Agreement dated as of January 30, 2015, by and between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Lewis A. Fanger. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2015)
    
10.40+

 Inducement Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2015, by and between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Lewis A. Fanger. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2015)
    
10.41 First Amendment to Settlement Agreement dated as of January 28, 2015 by and among the Company, Daniel R. Lee, Bradley M. Tirpak, and Craig W. Thomas. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 29, 2015)
    
10.42Separation Agreement dated as of November 28, 2014 by and between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Andre M. Hilliou. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2014)
    
10.43Separation Agreement dated as of November 28, 2014 by and between Full House Resorts, Inc. and Mark L. Miller. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2014)
10.44Amendment to Separation Agreement dated as of February 18, 2015 by and between the Company and Andre M. Hilliou (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2015)
10.45Amendment to Separation Agreement dated as of February 18, 2015 by and between the Company and Mark L. Miller (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2015)
10.46+10.42+ Employment Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2015, by and among Full House Resorts, Inc. and Elaine L. Guidroz (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on July 23, 2015)
10.43Standby Purchase Agreement dated October 7, 2016 between the Company and Daniel R. Lee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on October 7, 2016)
10.44Registration Rights Agreement dated October 7, 2016 between the Company and Daniel R. Lee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-32583) filed on October 7, 2016)
21.1*

 List of Subsidiaries of Full House Resorts, Inc.
    
23.1* Consent of Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern, independent auditors to the Company
    
31.1*

 Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    


31.2*

 Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.1* Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 

80



32.2* Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1*Description of Governmental Gaming Regulations
 
101.INS* XBRL Instance
 
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
 
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition
 
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels
 
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation
    
                                                                                            
* Filed herewith.
+ Executive compensation plan or arrangement.



81





SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC. 
 
March 29, 201617, 2017By:/s/ DANIEL R. LEE
  Daniel R. Lee, Chief Executive Officer 
 
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name and Capacity Date
   
/s/ DANIEL R. LEE March 29, 201617, 2017
Daniel R. Lee, Chief Executive Officer and Director  
(Principal Executive Officer)  
   
/s/ LEWIS A. FANGER March 29, 201617, 2017
Lewis A. Fanger, Chief Financial Officer  
(Principal Financial Officer)  
   
/s/ KENNETH R. ADAMS March 29, 201617, 2017
Kenneth R. Adams, Director  
   
/s/ CARL G. BRAUNLICH March 29, 201617, 2017
Carl G. Braunlich, Director  
   
/s/ W. H. BAIRD GARRETT March 29, 201617, 2017
W. H. Baird Garrett, Director  
   
/s/ ELLIS LANDAU March 29, 201617, 2017
Ellis Landau, Director  
   
/s/ KATHLEEN MARSHALL March 29, 201617, 2017
Kathleen Marshall, Director  
   
/s/ CRAIG W. THOMAS March 29, 201617, 2017
Craig W. Thomas, Director  
   
/s/ BRADLEY M. TIRPAK March 29, 201617, 2017
Bradley M. Tirpak, Director  


8275