UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

   
[X]þ Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 20032004

or

[  ]
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from            to

Commission file number1-3560

P. H. Glatfelter Company

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 23-0628360
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
   
96 South George Street, Suite 500
York, Pennsylvania 17401

(Address of principal executive offices)
 (717) 225-4711
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

   
Title of Class Name of Exchange on which registered


Common Stock, par value $.01 per share New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ].
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the filer is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [  ].
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy of information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o

Based on the closing price as of June 30, 2003, the aggregate market value of Common Stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates on March 3, 2004 was $417,250,390.
Indicate by check mark whether the filer is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yesþ Noo.

Based on the closing price as of June 30, 2004, the aggregate market value of Common Stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates was $538.1 million.

Common Stock outstanding on March 3, 20042, 2005 totaled 43,804,31043,965,207 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K: Proxy Statement to be dated on or about March 24, 2004 (Part III).



Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K: Proxy Statement to be dated on or about March 25, 2005 (Part III).

 


P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
for the YEAR ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 20032004

Table of Contents

     
    Page
     
Item 1  21
Item 2 5
Item 3Legal Proceedings 6
Item 43 7
Item 4 67
   7
PART II
     
Item 5PART II
 
Item 5 and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 8
Item 6  9
Item 7  10
Item 7A  1920
Item 8  2122
Item 9  4650
Item 9A  50
46Item 9B 
 50
     
Item 10Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant46PART III
Item 11Executive Compensation46
Item 12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management46
Item 13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions46
Item 14Principal Accounting Fees and Services46
PART IV
     
Item 1510 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules,47
SIGNATURESExecutive Officers of the Registrant
 50
Item 11 
 50
Item 1250
Item 1350
Item 1450
     
PART IV
Item 1551
SIGNATURES54
CERTIFICATIONS55
SCHEDULE II59
BY-LAWS AS AMENDED THROUGH MARCH 9, 2005
SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS WITH CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
CERTIFICATION OF GEORGE H. GLATFELTER, II
CERTIFICATION OF JOHN C. VAN RODEN, JR.
CERTIFICATION OF GEORGE H. GLATFELTER, II, PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION OF JOHN C. VAN RODEN, JR. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

-1-
GLATFELTER


PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date of this filing. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. See Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Forward-Looking Statements”.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Glatfelter began operations in 1864 in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania and in 1905 incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Todaytoday we believe we are one of the world’s leading manufacturers of specialty papers and engineered products. Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania, we own and operate paper mills located in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, and Neenah, Wisconsin. In 1998 we expanded our global reach with the acquisition of Schoeller & Hoesch GmbH & Co. (“S&H”). Based inWisconsin, Gernsbach, Germany S&H operates paper mills in Gernsbach and Scaër, France, and hasas well as an abaca pulp mill in the Philippines. Our products are marketed worldwide either through wholesale paper merchants, brokers and agents, or directly to our customers.

In August 2001, we completed the divestiture of our Ecusta Division, a supplier of paper primarily to the tobacco and financial printing industries. Product sales for the Ecusta Division, which are included in net sales in the Consolidated Statements of Income in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, totaled approximately $90.8 million in 2001.

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GLT”. As used herein, “Glatfelter,” “we,” “our” and similar terms include P. H. Glatfelter Company and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.

     We serve customers in numerous markets, including book publishing, envelope & converting, food and beverage, pressure-sensitive, digital imaging, composite laminates, and other highly technical niche markets. Many of the markets in which we operate are characterized by higher-value-added products and, in some cases, by higher growth prospects and lower cyclicality than commodity paper markets. Examples of some of our key product offerings include papers for:

•  Tea bags and coffee filters;
•  Trade book publishing;
•  Specialized envelopes;
•  Playing cards;
•  Pressure-sensitive postage stamps;
•  Metallized labels for beer bottles; and
•  Digital imaging applications.

     We market our products worldwide both through wholesale paper merchants, brokers and agents, and directly to our customers.

Our Business Units

     During the year we changed the way we manage our business and transitioned from three distinct business units to two: the Europe-based Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit and the North America-based Specialty Papers business unit. While the Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit remains unchanged, the formation of the Specialty Papers business unit, which consists of the former Engineered Products and the formation of the Printing &

Converting Papers business units, allows us to more effectively manage the demand planning process, optimize product mix, minimize process variability and meet the demands of our customers. As a result of this transition, all segment data has been restated to give effect to our new management structure. The following table summarizes consolidated net sales and the relative net sales contribution of each of our business units for the past three fiscal years:

              
Dollars in thousands 2004   2003  2002 
    
Net sales $543,524   $533,193  $540,347 
              
Business unit composition
             
Specialty Papers  62.1%   67.2%  71.2%
Long Fiber & Overlay Papers  37.8    31.0   25.1 
Tobacco (1)  0.1    1.8   3.7 
      
Total  100.0%   100.0%  100.0%
    


(1)– As of July 2004, we no longer produce products for the Tobacco industry.

Net tons sold by each business unit for the past three years were as follows:

              
  2004   2003  2002 
      
Specialty Papers  421,504    446,110   474,343 
Long Fiber & Overlay Papers  48,528    42,993   40,751 
Tobacco  390    6,463   13,109 
      
Total  470,422    495,566   528,203 
    

Specialty Papers

Our North America-based Specialty Papers business unit focuses on papers for the production of high-quality hardbound books and other book publishing needs, envelope & converting industries and highly technical customized products for the digital imaging, casting and release, pressure sensitive, and several niche technical specialty markets.

     Total book publishing papers represented 41.8%, 47.4% and 53.6% of this business unit’s revenue in the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We believe we are the leading supplier of book publishing papers in the United States. Specialty Papers also produces paper that is converted into specialized envelopes in a wide array of colors, finishes and capabilities. Net sales of envelope & converting papers represented 24.2%, 20.6% and 19.1% of this business unit’s net sales in the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The book publishing and envelope & converting papers markets are generally more mature and, therefore, have modest growth characteristics.

     Specialty Papers’ highly technical engineered paper products include those designed for multiple end uses, such as papers for pressure-sensitive postage stamps, disposable medical garments, playing cards and digital imaging applications. Revenue from of technical engineered products represented 32.5%, 30.1% and 26.7% of this business unit’s net sales in the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Such products comprise an



-1-

GLATFELTER


array of distinct business niches that are in a continuous state of evolution. These include digital imaging, casting and specialty release, pressure-sensitive, and industrial specialty. Many of these products are utilized in demanding, specialized customer and end-user applications and, therefore, command higher per ton values and generally exhibit greater pricing stability relative to commodity grade paper products. Some of our products are new and high growth while others are more mature and further along on the development curve. Because many of these products are technically complex and involve substantial customer-supplier development collaboration, product pricing has remained relatively stable.

Long Fiber & Overlay Papers

     Long Fiber & Overlay Papers, based in Gernsbach, Germany, focuses on higher-value-added products, such as paper for tea bags and coffee pods/pads and filters, decorative laminates used for furniture and flooring, and metallized products used in the labeling of beer bottles. Long fiber papers, which is the generic term we use to describe products made from abaca pulp (primarily tea bag and coffee filter papers), accounted for approximately 52.3%, 58.5% and 56.3% of this business unit’s net sales in the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This focus on long fiber papers has made us one of the world’s largest producers of tea bag papers. The balance of this unit’s sales are comprised of overlay and technical specialty products, which include flooring and furniture overlay papers, metallized products, and papers for adhesive tapes, vacuum bags, holographic labels and gift wrap. Many long fiber and overlay papers are technically sophisticated. We believe we are well positioned to produce these extremely lightweight papers because we understand their complexities, which require the use of highly specialized fiber and specifically designed papermaking equipment.

Other

     In August 2001, we completed the divestiture of our Ecusta Division, a supplier of paper primarily to the tobacco and financial printing industries. Until July 2004, we supplied tobacco papers to fulfill our obligations under a supply agreement entered into in connection with the divestiture. We no longer manufacture or sell tobacco paper products.

     Additional financial information for each of our business units during the past three years is included in Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our Competitive Strengths

     Since commencing operations over 140 years ago, we believe that Glatfelter has developed into one of the world’s leading manufacturers of specialty papers and engineered products. We believe that the following competitive strengths have contributed to our success:

     •Leading market positions in higher-value, niche segments.We have focused our resources to achieve market-leading positions in certain higher-value, niche segments. Our products include various highly specialized paper products designed for technically demanding end uses. Consequently, many of our products achieve premium pricing relative to that of commodity paper grades. In 2004, approximately 73% of our sales were derived from these higher-value, niche products. The specialized nature of these products generally provides greater pricing stability relative to commodity paper products.

     •Customer-centric business focus.We offer a unique and diverse product line that can be customized to serve the individual needs of our customers. Our size allows us to develop close relationships with our key customers and to be adaptable in our product development, manufacturing, sales and marketing practices. We believe that this approach has led to the development of excellent customer relationships, defensible market positions, and increased pricing stability relative to commodity paper producers. Additionally, our customer-centric focus has been a key driver to our success in new product development.

     •Significant investment in product development.In order to keep up with our customers’ ever-changing needs, we continually enhance our product offerings through significant investment in product development. In each of the past three years, we invested approximately $5 million in product development activities. We derive a significant portion of our revenue from products developed, enhanced or improved as a result of these activities. Revenue generated from products developed, enhanced or improved within the five previous years as a result of these activities represented approximately 60%, 47% and 37% of net sales in the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     •Integrated production.As a partially integrated producer, we are able to mitigate changes in the costs of certain raw materials and energy. Our Spring Grove mill is a vertically integrated operation producing in excess of 85% of the annual pulp required for its paper production. The principal raw material used to produce this pulp is pulpwood, consisting of both hardwoods and softwoods. We own approximately 84,000 acres of timberlands and obtain approximately 25% of our pulpwood requirements for our Spring Grove facility from Company-owned timberlands, which helps stabilize our fiber costs in a



-2-

GLATFELTER


highly fragmented market. Our Spring Grove facility also generates 100% of the steam and electricity required for its operations. In addition, our Philippine mill processes abaca fiber to produce abaca pulp, which is a key raw material used by our Long Fiber & Overlay business unit in Gernsbach and Scaër.

Our Business Strategy

Our Visionvision is to bebecome the global supplier of choice in specialty papers and engineered products. We are organized into three business units: Engineered Products, Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers, and Printing & Converting Papers. We also supply tobacco papers to fulfill obligations of a supply agreement entered into in connection with the sale of our Ecusta Division. This supply agreement expires in mid-2004.

The financial information presented within this section excludes the Ecusta Division. The following table summarizes consolidated net sales and the relative net sales contribution of each business unit for the past three years ended December 31:

             
Dollars in thousands
 2003
 2002
 2001
Net sales $533,193  $540,347  $541,766 
Business unit composition
            
Engineered Products  26%  23%  22%
Long Fiber & Overlay Papers  25   20   18 
Printing & Converting  47   53   54 
Tobacco  2   4   6 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
Total  100%  100%  100%
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

Additional business unit financial information is included in Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Engineered Productsis focused on highly technical “engineered” paper products designed for multiple end uses, such as papers for pressure sensitive postage stamps, disposable medical garments, playing cards and digital inkjet applications. This business unit comprises an array of products in distinct business niches that are in a continuous state of evolution. Some are high growth; others are further along on the development curve. Because the products are technically complex and require substantial “development capital” generated through the customer-supplier relationships, product pricing in this business unit has remained relatively stable.

Long-Fiber & Overlay PapersThis business unit focuses on products such as paper for tea bags and decorative laminates used for furniture, flooring and other commercial applications. Long-fiber papers, (the generic term we use to describe products primarily made from abaca pulp) primarily tea bag and related papers accounted for 72%, 70% and 72% of this business unit’s sales in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The balance of this unit’s sales represented overlay and casing products. Similar to engineered products, long-fiber and overlay papers are technically sophisticated. We believe we are uniquely positioned to produce these extremely lightweight papers because we understand their complexities, which require the use of highly specialized fiber and specifically designed papermaking equipment.

Printing & Converting Papersproducts include papers for the production of high-quality hardbound books. Book publishing papers represented 69% 73% and 74% of this business unit’s sales in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. We believe we are acknowledged as the leading supplier of papers for this market in the United States. In addition to book paper, this business unit also produces other papers, including paper that is converted into specialized envelopes in a wide array of colors, finishes and capabilities. These markets are in more mature phases of their lifecycles, exhibiting modest growth characteristics that historically parallel the U.S. Gross Domestic Product; however, the current industry conditions have adversely impacted the performance of this unit.

-2-
GLATFELTER


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
Exhibit Index
SIGNATURES
Schedule II
BY-LAWS
SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGRMTS
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
SECTION 302(A) CERTIFICATION OF CEO
SECTION 302(A) CERTIFICATION OF CFO
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO


Tobacco Paperssales in 2003 and 2002 were made pursuant to a supply agreement between S&H and Purico (IOM) Limited,et al(“Purico”), the buyers of the Ecusta Division. We will sell tobacco papers to an affiliate of Purico through mid-2004.

The industry in which we operate has been challenged by an imbalance between supply and demand, particularly for more commodity-like products offered by the Printing & Converting Papers business unit. Weakening demand and declining prices and higher production costs characterize the operating environment in this business unit.

To be successful in this environment, our strategy is to aggressively reduce costs and reposition our product portfolios to better align with our customers’ changing needs.

Our growth strategy is market focused and includes investments in developing products to meet the changing needs of our customers. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, we spent $5.1 million, $5.1 million and $5.2 million, respectively, on research and development activities. We continue to derive a significant portion of our revenue as a result of these activities. Revenue generated from products new to us in the past five years represented approximately 47%, 37% and 25% during 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, of consolidated revenue.

We are also focused on fully developing the benefits from our recently completed investment in a specialized, state-of-the-art inclined wire paper machine serving growth markets in our Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit. The investment in this machine supports our development of a new market of technical specialty papers, the global penetration of certain markets and our focus on cost reduction efforts within the Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit.

In September 2003, we initiated a restructuring of our Neenah, WI facility (the “Neenah restructuring”). The Neenah restructuring included permanently shutting down a paper making machine and the deinking process at the Neenah facility. The abandoned paper machine represented approximately 25% of the annual production capacity of the Neenah facility, and the deinking facility processed recycled wastepaper to produce pulp. This pulp source has been replaced by purchased market pulp. These actions will allow us to focus on our highest value-added products, fortify our leadership position in premium book publishing papers, and support growth in our Engineered Products and the Long Fiber & Overlay Products businesses.

We are continuously developing and refining strategies to positionstrengthen our business and position it for the future. Execution of these strategies is intended to capitalize on our strengths in customer relationships, technology, and people, and onas well as our leadership positionpositions in certain markets. In recent years, our industry has been challenged by a supply and demand imbalance, particularly for commodity-like products. To be successful in the current market environment, our strategy is focused on aggressively reducing costs and continually repositioning our product portfolio to increase our focus on higher-value, niche products and to better align our product offerings with our customers’ ever-changing needs. Certain key elements of our business strategy are outlined below:

     •Reposition our product portfolio.By leveraging our leadership positions in several specialty niche markets, we plan to accelerate growth, improve margins and generate better financial returns through the optimization of our product portfolio. In 2004, approximately 73% of our total sales were derived from what we consider to be higher-value, niche products. Over time, we plan to increase our concentration on such products by driving growth in our sales of trade book papers, uncoated specialty products, long fiber and overlay products, and other specialty products. We believe that this strategy will realign our business more closely with our customers’ needs and further reduce our exposure to the higher level of cyclicality experienced in commodity paper grades.

     •Execute Long Fiber & Overlay Papers growth plan.A core component of our long-term strategy is to drive growth in our Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit. Currently, we are one of the leading producers of tea bag coffee pod/pad papers in the world, and we believe that this segment has promising growth characteristics as certain markets move toward tea bags versus loose tea leaves. We believe that we are well positioned to capitalize on this growth by leveraging our strong customer relationships and market-leading position in this segment. In addition, our rebuilt paper machine in Gernsbach will allow us to penetrate certain technical specialty markets, including the wall coverings, textile/apparel and industrial markets.

     •Employ low cost approach to specialty product manufacturing.While we are focused on higher-value, niche products, we seek to employ a commodity-like, low-cost approach to our manufacturing activities. In 2004, we initiated the North American Restructuring Program that is designed to improve operating results by, among other factors, improving workforce efficiencies and implementing improved supply chain management processes. A major component of the workforce efficiencies resulted from an approximately 20% workforce reduction agreed to by our union members at our Spring Grove facility. The financial benefits from these efforts began to phase-in during the third quarter of 2004, and are expected to approximate $15 million to $20 million annually, beginning in 2006. During 2005, the financial benefits are expected to increase throughout much of the year aggregating an amount under the low end of the range of ultimate benefits.

     •Maintain a strong balance sheet and preserve financial flexibility.We are focused on prudent financial management and the maintenance of a conservative capital structure. Concurrent with the announcement of certain restructuring initiatives in 2003, we reduced our dividend in order to conserve approximately $15 million in annual cash flow to retain financial flexibility and strengthen our balance sheet. Furthermore, we are committed to maintaining a strong balance sheet and our flexibility to pursue strategic opportunities that will benefit our shareholders. We demonstrated this commitment in 2004, during which we reduced net debt by approximately $67 million.



-3-

GLATFELTER


Raw Material and Energy

The following table provides an overview of the estimated amount of principal raw materials (“PRM”) estimated to be used by each of our manufacturing facilities on an annual basis:

                
 Estimated   Estimated Annual Percent of 
 Annual Percent of Quantity PRM 
 Quantity PRM (short tons) Purchased 
 (short tons)
 Purchased
Domestic
  
Spring Grove  
Pulpwood 960,000  75% 1,006,000  75%
Wood- and other pulps 29,000 100  37,000 100 
 
Neenah  
Wood- and other pulps 49,700 100  70,000 100 
Pulp substitutes 51,000 100  41,000 100 
 
International
  
Gernsbach  
Wood- and other pulps 28,500 100  32,900 100 
Abaca pulp 6,800 0  8,450  
Synthetic fiber 2,000 100  2,000 100 
 
Scaër  
Wood pulp 1,700 100  1,450 100 
Abaca pulp 1,600 0  2,670  
Synthetic fiber 1,200 100  1,200 100 
 
Philippines  
Abaca fiber 14,000 100  17,980 100 

Our Spring Grove mill is a vertically integrated operation producing in excess of 85% of the annual pulp required for paper production. The principal raw material used to produce this pulp is pulpwood, of which both hardwoods and softwoods are used. At December 31, 2003,2004, we owned approximately 89,00084,000 acres of woodlands. During 2003,In addition to this source of pulpwood, we sold approximately 25,500 acres of timberland and we entered intoare committed, under a Supply Agreement (the “Agreement”) withexpiring in 2011, to buy at market prices a minimum annual amount of pine pulpwood averaging 34,425 tons per annum over the buyerseight-year term of the timberlands pursuantagreement. The pulpwood purchased under this agreement is to whichbe harvested from land we agreed to purchase from the buyer,sold in March 2003.

In addition to these sources, hardwoods are available within a relatively short distance of our Spring Grove mill. Softwoods are obtained primarily from Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. To protect our sources of pulpwood, we actively promote conservation and forest management among suppliers and woodland owners.

-3-
GLATFELTER


The     Our Spring Grove, Pennsylvania facility generates 100% of the steam and electricity required for its operations. Principal fuel sources used by the Spring Grove facility are coal, recycled pulping chemicals, bark and wood waste, and oil (#2 and #6).oil. This facility also produces excess electricity that is sold to the local power company under a long-term co-generation contract expiring in 2010. Net energy sales were $10.0 million in both 2004 and 2003, and $9.8 million and $9.7 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.2002.

Until the fourth quarter of 2003, theour Neenah, Wisconsin facility recycled high-grade wastepaper as its primary raw material. Since the initiation of the restructuring at the Neenah restructuring discussed above,facility, the pulp requirements for this facility are fulfilled with purchased pulp and hardwood pulp substitutes.

The Neenah facility purchases steam under a twenty-year contract, expiring in 2018, from a third party steam supplier which processes sludge from ourthe Neenah facility and from other mills in the Neenah area. UnderSteam acquired under the contract the cost of the steam is based on the market pricecost of natural gas and we are required to purchase an annual minimum of 1.1 million k lbs. of steam. Based on expected production levels in 2004, we anticipate our needs will approximate 1 million k lbs.coal. The Neenah facility generatedgenerates approximately 15% of its required electrical power and purchases the remainder.

Our Philippine mill processes abaca fiber to produce abaca pulp. This abaca pulp production provides a unique advantage by supplying a key raw material used by our Long Fiber & Overlay business unit in Gernsbach and Scaër. Events may arise from the relatively unstable geopoliticalpolitical and economic environment in which the Philippine facility operates that could interrupt the production of abaca pulp. Management periodically evaluates the supply chain, including the supply of abaca pulp to our Gernsbach and Scaër facilities. Any extended interruption of the Philippine operation could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and/or results of operations. We believe we have approximately fourthree months of abaca pulp supply available to us. In addition, we have established contingency plans for alternative sources of abaca pulp. However, the cost of obtaining abaca pulp from such alternative sources would likely be higher.

The Gernsbach and Scaër facilities both generate all of the steam required for their operations. The Gernsbach facility generated approximately 30% of its 20032004 electricity needs and purchased the balance. The Scaër facility purchased all of its 2004 electric power requirements. Natural gas was used to produce substantially all of Gernsbach’s internally generated energy at the Gernsbach’s facility during 2003. The2004. Beginning in September 2004, the Scaër facility purchased all of its 2003 electric power requirements.switched from fuel oil to natural gas.

Based on information currently available, we believe that we will continue to have ready access, for the foreseeable future, to all principal raw materials used in the production of our products. The cost of our raw material is subject to change, including, but not limited to, costs of wood and pulp products and gasenergy costs.

New Product Development

     In order to keep up with our customers’ ever-changing needs, we are continually enhancing our product offerings through significant investment in product development activities, including product customizations developed in



-4-

GLATFELTER


partnership or close collaboration with our customers. In each of the past three years, we invested approximately $5.2 million on product development. Revenue generated from products developed, enhanced or improved within the five previous years as a result of these activities represented approximately 60%, 47% and oil energy costs.37% of net sales in the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In determining revenue attributable to product development activities, we utilize an independently developed framework, which we believe to be generally accepted in the field of new product management. This framework categorizes products developed, enhanced or improved as those that (i) are new to the world, (ii) represent a product line new to our Company, (iii) are a new product within an existing product line, (iv) are a significant improvement of an existing product, (v) are repositioned into a new application or market, or (vi) are a lower cost alternative to an existing product of the Company and seen by our customers as a new offering. Approximately 47% of our revenue attributable to developed, enhanced or improved products come from products that fit within category (ii) and (iii), above.

Concentration of Customers

In 2004, 2003 and 2002, no single customer represented more than 10% of our consolidated net sales. In 2001, net sales to one customer, Central National Gottesman, Inc. (which buys paper through its division, Lindenmeyr Book Publishing) were approximately 11%

Competition

     Our industry is highly competitive. We compete on the basis of net sales, excluding the Ecusta Division.

Backlog

Backlogs are generally not significant in our U.S.-based business, as substantially allquality of our products, customer orders are filled within 30 days of receipt. Backlogs atservice, product development activities, price and distribution. We offer our S&H operation generally are 60-90 days. A backlog of unmade customer orders is monitored primarily for purposes of scheduling production to optimize paper machine performance.

Competition

The competitiveness ofproducts throughout the United States and globally in approximately 80 countries. Our competition in the markets in which we sellparticipate comes from companies of various sizes, some of which have greater financial and other resources than we do. In the engineered products markets of our products varies. In our Engineered ProductsSpecialty Papers business unit and Long-Fiberin the Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business units,unit, competition is product line specific as the necessity for technical expertise and specialized manufacturing equipment limits the number of companies offering multiple product lines. We compete with specialty divisions of large companies such as, among others, Ahlstrom, International Paper, MeadWestvaco, Sappi and Stora Enso Mead/Westvaco, Sappi and International Paper.as well as other companies such as J R Crompton. Service, product performance, and technological advances and product pricing are important competitive factors with respect to all our products. We believe our reputation in these areas continues to be excellent.

There are a number of companies in the United States that manufacture printing and converting papers. We believe we are the recognized leader in book publishing papers and compete in these markets with, among others, Domtar and Weyerhaeuser. In the envelope sector we

compete with, among others, Blue Ridge, International Paper Weyerhaeuser and Blue Ridge.Weyerhaeuser. Capacity in the worldwide uncoated free-sheet industry which includes specialty papers, has exceeded demand in recent years. Although we believe demand increases will narrow this gap, the worldwide excess capacity is not expected to decline significantly for the next few years.

     Demand for our products in the markets we serve is primarily driven by consumption of the products we produce, which is often affected by general economic conditions. In recent years, the global paper industry in which we compete has been adversely impacted by paper producing capacity exceeding the demand for products. The Specialty Papers business unit, in particular, has been negatively affected by such over capacity. Downturns in our target markets could result in decreased demand for our products. In addition to fluctuations in demand for our products in the markets we serve, the markets for our paper products are also significantly affected by changes in industry capacity and output levels. There have been periods of supply/demand imbalance in the pulp and paper industry that have caused pulp and paper prices to be volatile.

Our ability to compete in a global market place is also influenced by the relative value of the functional currency of our operations compared to the currency of the markets in which we sell our products and the location of our competitors. Due to the significant strengthening of the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar and other currencies over the last year,few years, our European-basedEurope-based facilities have seen increasing pricing and competitive pressures.

-4-
GLATFELTER


Employees

The following table summarizes our workforce as of December 31, 2003:

             
  Employees
      Non-  
Location
 Union
 union
 Total
US
            
Corporate/Spring Grove  707   391   1,098 
Neenah(1)
  231   60   291 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   938   451   1,389 
International
            
Gernsbach  416   202   618 
Scaër  89   56   145 
Philippines  52   27   79 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   557   285   842 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
Total  1,495   736   2,231 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

(1) As discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, we initiated a significant headcount reduction at Neenah that is expected to be completed by the end of March 2004.

Different locals of the Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union (PACE) represent the hourly employees at our US facilities.

A five-year labor agreement that covers employees in Spring Grove was ratified in November 2002 effective for the five-year period ending January 2008. Among other changes, the contract provides for wage increases of 2.5% in each of the first two years of the contract and 3% for the remaining years.

On October 22, 2002, hourly employees at our Neenah, Wisconsin facility ratified a five-year labor agreement with an expiration date of August 1, 2007. Under this agreement, effective August 1st of each year, wages increase 3% for the duration of the agreement.

Various unions represent employees at our S&H facility. One-year labor agreements covering employees at the Gernsbach, Germany and Scaër, France facilities were entered into during 2003 with terms retroactive to the expiration dates of the respective agreements. These expire in the first quarter of 2004. The terms and conditions of the agreements will remain in effect until new agreements are negotiated, although any wage increase negotiated in the new agreements will be retroactive to the respective expiration dates of the old agreements. Wages are expected to increase 2.5% in 2004. We are not directly involved in these negotiations as paper industry representatives are negotiating the agreements. This situation is not unusual in Germany and France, and we do not believe that the lack of an agreement will result in any significant operational interruptions.

Employees at our pulpmill in the Philippines are covered by a five-year labor agreement, which was negotiated at the end of 2002.

We consider the overall relationship with our employees to be satisfactory.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to loss contingencies resulting from regulation by various federal, state, local and foreign governmental authorities with respect to the environmental impact on the environment of mills we operate, or have operated.our mills. To comply with environmental laws and regulations, we will continue to incurhave incurred substantial capital and operating expenditures.expenditures in past years. We anticipate that environmental regulation of our operations will continue to become more burdensome and that capital and operating expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. In addition, we may incur obligations to remove or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment resulting from the operation of our mills,operations, including the restoration of natural resources and liability for personal injury and for damages to property and natural resources. Because environmental regulations are not consistent worldwide, our ability to compete in the world marketplace may be adversely affected by capital and operating expenditures required for environmental compliance.

Additional information is included in Item 7 – Management’s Discussion & Analysis For a discussion of Results of Operations and Financial Condition and inenvironmental matters, see Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 19.



-5-

GLATFELTER


Employees

     The following table summarizes our workforce as of December 31, 2004:

             
  Employees 
Location Union  Salaried  Total 
 
U.S.
            
Corporate/Spring Grove  626   337   963 
Neenah  148   51   199 
   
   774   388   1,162 
             
International
            
Gernsbach  403   193   596 
Scaër  93   56   149 
Philippines  54   27   81 
   
   550   276   826 
   
Total  1,324   664   1,988 
 

     Different locals of the Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union, or PACE, represent the hourly employees at our U.S. facilities.

     A five-year labor agreement ending January 2008 covering employees in Spring Grove was ratified in November 2002. Among other changes, the contract provides for wage increases of 3% for years 2005 through 2007. In connection with the North American Restructuring Plan, the agreement was amended in July 2004 providing workplace flexibility, certain job changes and early retirement incentives.

     On October 22, 2002, hourly employees at our Neenah, Wisconsin facility ratified a five-year labor agreement with an expiration date of August 1, 2007. Under this agreement, effective August 1st of each year, wages increase 3% for the duration of the agreement.

     Various unions represent employees at our Schoeller & Hoesch facility. One-year labor agreements covering employees at the Gernsbach, Germany and Scaër, France facilities were entered into during 2004. The terms of the agreements provide for wage increases in 2004 of approximately 1.5%. Negotiations to renew the agreements began in February 2005. The terms and conditions of the agreements will remain in effect until new agreements are reached, although any wage increase negotiated in the new agreements will be retroactive to the respective expiration dates of the old agreements.

     Employees at our pulpmill in the Philippines are covered by a five-year labor agreement, which was negotiated at the end of 2002.

     We consider the overall relationship with our employees to be satisfactory.

Available Information

Our investor relations website can be accessed at www.glatfelter.com/e/investock.asp. We make available on our site free of charge our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K and other related information as soon as reasonably practical after they are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, our website includes a Corporate Governance page consisting of, among others, our Governance Principles and Code of Business Conduct, Board of Directors and Executive Officers, Nominating, Audit and Compensation committeesCommittees of the Board of Directors and their respective Charters, Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers of Glatfelter, our “whistle-blower” policy and other related material. We intend on satisfyingto satisfy the disclosure requirement for any future amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers by posting such information on our website. We will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers, without charge, to any person who requests one, by calling (717) 225-2703.225-2724.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our leased executivecorporate offices are located in York, Pennsylvania. We own and operate paper mills located in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania; Neenah, Wisconsin; Gernsbach, Germany; and Scaër, France. In addition, we own and operate a pulp mill in the Philippines.

-5-
GLATFELTER


We own substantially Substantially all of the propertiesequipment used in our papermaking operations. We own our operating equipmentand related operations, with the exception of some leased vehicles.vehicles, is also owned. All of our properties, other than those that are leased, are free from any material liens or encumbrances. We consider all of our buildings to be in good structural condition and well maintained and our properties to be suitable and adequate for present operations.

Estimated Annual Production Capacity (short tons)The following table summarizes the estimated production capacity of each of our facilities:

      
Estimated Annual Production Capacity (short tons)
 
Spring Grove  310,000  Uncoated
  66,000  Coated
Neenah  125,000  Uncoated
Gernsbach  38,00044,200  Lightweight
  8,80011,000  MetalizedMetallized
Scaër  4,4005,300  Lightweight
Philippines  9,30011,400  Abaca pulp

The Spring Grove facility includes five uncoated paper machines that have been rebuilt and modernized from time to time. The Spring Grove facilityIt has an off-line combi-blade coater and a Specialty Coater (“S-Coater”), which together yield a potential annual production capacity for coated paper of approximately 66,000 tons. Since uncoated paper is used in producing coated paper, this doesis not represent an increase in the Spring Grove milladditional capacity. We view the S-Coater as an important asset that allows us



-6-

GLATFELTER


to expand our more profitable engineered paper products business.

The Spring Grove facility also includes a pulpmill that has a production capacity of approximately 650 tons of bleached pulp per day. We have a precipitated calcium carbonate (“PCC”) plant at our Spring Grove facility that produces PCC at a lower cost than could be purchased from others and lowers the need for higher-priced raw material typically used for increasing the opacity and brightness of certain papers.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary Schoeller & Hoesch GmbH & Co. KG (“S&H&H”) owns and operates paper mills in Gernsbach, Germany and Scaër, France. S&H also owns a pulpmill in the Philippines that supplies substantially all of the abaca pulp requirements of the S&H paper mills.

In 2004, our Philippine facility, which supplies abaca pulp to S&H, expects to begin operation of a new globe digester that should increase our annual abaca pulp production by approximately 8%.

The Gernsbach facility includes five uncoated paper machines with an aggregate annual lightweight capacity of about 38,00044,200 tons. As discussed in Item 7- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, inIn 2003, we rebuilt a paper machine with a new state-of-the-art inclined wire paper machinetechnology (PM #9). We believe this machine provides us greater flexibility and technological capabilities. The Gernsbach facility also has the capacity to produce 8,80011,000 tons of metalizedmetallized papers annually, using a lacquering machine and two metalizers.metallizers. We purchase the base paper used to manufacture the metalizedmetallized paper.

In 2004, our Philippine facility, which supplies abaca pulp to S&H, began operation of a new globe digester that increased our annual abaca pulp production by approximately 8%.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In 1999, the EPA and the Pennsylvania DEP issued us separate Notices of Violation (“NOVs”) alleging violations of air pollution control laws, primarily for purportedly failing to obtain appropriate pre-construction air quality permits in conjunction with certain modifications to our Spring Grove facility.

For all but one of the modifications cited by the EPA, we applied for and obtained from the Pennsylvania DEP the pre-construction permits that we concluded were required by applicable law. The EPA reviewed those applications before the permits were issued. The Pennsylvania DEP’s NOV pertained only to the modification for which we did not receive a pre-construction permit. We conducted an evaluation at the time of this modification and determined that the pre-construction permit cited by the EPA and the Pennsylvania DEP was not required. We have been informed that the EPA and the Pennsylvania DEP will seek substantial emissions reductions, as well as civil penalties, to which we believe we have meritorious defenses. We are unable to predict whether these defenses would prevail in litigation. Should a government plaintiff obtain a judgment against us regarding these matters, it is likely that such a judgment would be material to our results of operations or financial condition.

We are involved in various lawsuits that we consider to be ordinary and incidental to our business. The ultimate outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we do not expect such lawsuits individually or in the aggregate, or individually, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

For a discussion of commitments, legal proceedings and related contingencies, see Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 19.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

Not Applicable – no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2003.

-6-
GLATFELTER2004.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers of Glatfelter as of March 10, 2004.2005.

       
Name
 Age
 Office with the Company
George H. Glatfelter II  5253  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Dante C. Parrini40Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
John C. van Roden, Jr.55Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
John P. Jacunski  3839  Vice President and Corporate Controller
Markus R. MuellerWerner A. Ruckenbrod  43Corporate Counsel and Director of Policy and Compliance
Dante C. Parrini39Senior Vice President and General Manager
C. Matthew Smith4547  Vice President and TreasurerLong Fiber & Overlay Papers
John C. van Roden, Jr.Mark A. Sullivan  54Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
William T. Yanavitch II4350  Vice President – Human ResourcesGlobal Supply Chain

Officers are elected to serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Except in the case of officers elected to fill a new position or a vacancy occurring at some other date, officers are generally elected at the organizational meeting of the Board of Directors held immediately after the annual meeting of shareholders.

George H. Glatfelter IIcurrently serves asis our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.Officer. From April 2000 to February 2001, Mr. Glatfelter was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. From June 1998 to April 2000, he was Chief Executive Officer and President.

Mr. Glatfelter serves as Directora director of Met-Pro Corporation; the American Forest and Paper Association; the National Council for Air and Stream Improvements; and the InstituteAlliance for the Chesapeake Bay.

Dante C. Parrinibecame Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in February 2005. Prior to this, Mr. Parrini was Senior Vice President and General Manager, a position he held since January 2003. From December 2000 until January 2003, Mr. Parrini was Vice President — Sales and Marketing. From July 2000 to December 2000, he was Vice President — Sales and Marketing, Glatfelter Division and Corporate Strategic Marketing.

John C. van Roden, Jr.was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in February 2005. Prior to that he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since he joined us in April 2003. From September 1998 to September 2002, Mr. van Roden was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Paper ScienceConectiv of Wilmington, DE.

Mr. van Roden is a Director of HB Fuller Company and Technology. Mr. Glatfelter is also a trustee of the York College of Pennsylvania.Ascendant Capital Partners, LLC.



-7-

GLATFELTER


John P. Jacunskijoined us in October 2003, and currently serves as Vice President & Corporate Controller. Mr. Jacunski was previously Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at WCI Steel, Inc. from June 1999 to October 2003. From May 1995 to June 1999 he was WCI’s Corporate Controller. Prior to joining WCI, Mr. Jacunski was with KPMG, an international accounting and consulting firm, where he served in various capacities.

Markus R. Muellerbecame Corporate Counsel and Director of Policy & Compliance in June 2000. Mr. Mueller has also served as Secretary since December 1999. Mr. Mueller was Associate Counsel from June 1998 to June 2000 for P. H. Glatfelter Company.

Dante C. Parrinibecame Senior Vice President and General Manager in January 2003. From December 2000 until January 2003, Mr. Parrini was Vice President - Sales and Marketing. From July 2000 to December 2000, he was Vice President - Sales and Marketing, Glatfelter Division and Corporate Strategic Marketing. From June 1999 to July 2000, he was Vice President - Sales and Marketing, Glatfelter Division. From August 1998 to June 1999, he was National Sales and Marketing Manager, Glatfelter Division.

Mr. Parrini serves as Director of the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry and of Junior Achievement of Southcentral Pennsylvania.

C. Matthew Smithcurrently serves as Vice President and Treasurer, and until December 18, 2003 served as Corporate Controller, having assumed that role in September 2001. From June 2000 to September 2001, Mr. Smith was Chief Financial Officer and continued to serve as Assistant Secretary. From December 1999 to June 2000, he was Assistant Secretary and Vice President – Finance. From December 1998 to December 1999, he was Vice President – Finance.

Mr. Smith has also served as a director of the United Way of York County since 1999.

John C. van Roden, Jr., since April 8, 2003, serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From September 1998 to September 2002, Mr. van Roden was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Conectiv of Wilmington, DE.

Mr. van Roden is a Director of HB Fuller Company and Ascendant Capital Partners, LLC.

-7-
GLATFELTER


William T. Yanavitch IIbecame Vice President - Human Resources in July 2000. From October 1998 to July 2000, Mr. Yanavitch was Director of Human Resources for the Ceramco and Trubyte Divisions of Dentsply.

In addition to the above executive officers of our company, the following individuals serve in a significant capacity with business unit responsibilities and/or policy-making capacities:

William W. Beible, Jr., is our Vice President Business Improvement. In this capacity, Mr. Beible is responsible for program management of all significant corporate projects including the North American restructuring program. Other key responsibilities include corporate information technology and leadership of sustainable business improvement efforts.

John R. Blindserves as our Director of Manufacturing – Specialty Papers. Mr. Blind has over 22 years of experience with our company in various capacities including Director of Manufacturing North America, Mill Manager of our Neenah facility, production management and other technical and engineering related positions.

Timothy R. Hessis our Director of Specialty Papers Business. Prior to being promoted to this position in January 2004, Mr. Hess was our Engineered Products Business Unit Director. Since joining Glatfelter in 1994, Mr. Hess has held various technical, manufacturing, sales and business development positions in the specialty papers arena.

Werner A. Ruckenbrodis Vice President Long Fiber & Overlay Papers with responsibilities for the operations and performance of this business unit. Mr. Ruckenbrod joined our subsidiary, S&H, in 1984. Since joining our company, Mr. Ruckenbrod has held various production related positions.

Mark A. Sullivanwas appointed Vice President Global Supply Chain in February 2005. Mr. Sullivan joined our company in December 2003, as Chief Procurement Officer. Mr. Sullivan’sHis experience includes a broad array of operations and supply chain management responsibilities during 20 years with the DuPont Company. He served with T-Mobile USA as an independent contractor during 2003, and Concur Technologies from 1999 until 2002.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Common Stock Prices and Dividends Declared Information

The following table shows the high and low prices of our common stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GLT” and the dividend declared per share for each quarter during the past two years.

                        
Quarter
 High
 Low
 Dividend
 High Low Dividend 
2004
 
Fourth
 $15.49 $11.34 $0.09 
Third
 14.23 11.50 0.09 
Second
 14.09 10.45 0.09 
First
 12.93 10.44 0.09 
 
2003
  
Fourth
 $13.29 $11.70 $.09  $13.29 $11.70 $0.09 
Third
 15.45 11.67 .09  15.45 11.67 0.09 
Second
 15.05 10.70 .175  15.05 10.70 0.175 
First
 14.15 9.65 .175  14.15 9.65 0.175 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2002 
Fourth $14.05 $10.22 $.175 
Third 18.94 11.50 .175 
Second 19.35 16.32 .175 
First 18.84 14.65 .175 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

As of March 3, 2004,2, 2005, we had 2,2992,054 shareholders of record. A number of the shareholders of record are nominees.

-8-
GLATFELTERIn accordance with our non-employee director compensation policy, two-thirds of the $18,000 retainer that non-employee directors received in 2004 was paid in shares of our common stock. We granted an aggregate of 3,696 shares of our common stock to our non-employee directors in May 2004 and an aggregate 3,346 shares of common stock to our non-employee directors on November 2004 in connection with payment of the retainer. The grants were made in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.



-8-

GLATFELTER


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data

                                   
As of or for the Year ended December 31          
As of or for the year ended December 31           
In thousands, except per share
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2000
 1999
 2004 2003 2002 2001 (1) 2000 
   
Net sales $533,193 $540,347 $632,602 $721,945 $702,377  $543,524   $533,193 $540,347 $632,602 $721,945 
Energy sales, net 9,953   10,040 9,814 9,661 9,243 
           
Total revenue 553,477   543,233 550,161 642,263 731,188 
Restructuring charges and unusual items  (20,375)   (24,995)  (2,241)  (60,908)  (3,336)
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands 58,509   32,334 1,304 2,015 467 
Gains from insurance recoveries 32,785       
Income from continuing operations 12,986 37,637 6,829 43,367 41,173  56,102   12,986 37,637 6,829 43,367 
Income per share from continuing operations    
Basic 0.30 0.87 0.16 1.02 0.98  1.28   0.30 0.87 0.16 1.02 
Diluted 0.30 0.86 0.16 1.02 0.97  1.27   0.30 0.86 0.16 1.02 
Total assets 1,027,019 953,202 963,250 1,019,631 999,831  1,052,270   1,027,019 953,202 966,604 1,023,325 
Long-term debt 249,275 219,504 276,302 301,509 302,704 
Total debt 211,227   254,275 220,532 277,755 306,822 
Shareholders’ equity 371,431 373,833 353,469 372,703 358,124  420,370   371,431 373,833 353,469 372,703 
Cash dividends declared per common share .53 .70 .70 .70 .70   0.36   0.53 0.70 0.70 0.70 
  


1. Our Ecusta Division was sold in August 2001. Ecusta Division net sales totaled $90.8 million. In 2001, we recorded a pre-tax loss on the sale, which was recorded as an unusual item, totaling $58.4 million. In 2000, we recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $3.3 million related to workforce reductions at the Ecusta facility.
 
2. The above Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data, and the comparability thereof, includes the impact of certain charges and gains from asset dispositions. For a discussion of these restructuring charges, unusual items and gains from sales of plant, equipment and timberlands that affect the comparability of this information, see Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplemental Data Notes 5 to 8.7 and Note 9.

-9-
- 9 -

GLATFELTER


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding industry prospects and future consolidated financial position or results of operations, made in this Report on Form 10-K are forward looking. We use words such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “expects”, “future”, “intends” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from management’s expectations. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements regarding expectations of, among others, net sales, costs of products sold, restructuring charges, non-cash pension income, restructuring charges, environmental costs, capital expenditures and liquidity, all of which are inherently difficult to predict. Although we make such statements based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. Accordingly, we identify the following important factors, among others, which could cause our results to differ from any results that might be projected, forecasted or estimated in any such forward-looking statements:

 i.  variations in demand for, or pricing of, our products;
 
 ii.  changes in the cost or availability of raw materials we use, in particular market pulp, pulp substitutes, and abaca fiber, and changes in energy-related costs;
 
 iii.  our ability to develop new, high value-added engineered productsEngineered Products and long fiberLong Fiber & overlay papers;Overlay Papers;
 
 iv.the impact of competition, changes in industry paper production capacity, including the construction of new mills, the closing of mills and incremental changes due to capital expenditures or productivity increases;
 
 v.the execution of our ability to execute our North American Restructuring Program, growth strategies and cost reduction initiatives;
 

 vi.  cost and other effects of environmental compliance, cleanup, damages, remediation or restoration, or personal injury or property damages related thereto, such as costs associated with the NOVs issued by the EPA and the Pennsylvania DEP, the costs of natural resource restoration or damages related to the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) in the lower Fox River on which our Neenah mill is located; and the costs of environmental matters at our former Ecusta Division mill;
 
 vii.  the gain or loss of significant customers and/or on-going viability of such customers;
 
 viii.  risks associated with our international operations, including local economic and political environments and fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
 
 ix.  geopolitical events, including war and terrorism;
 
 x.  enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign tax or other legislation or changes in government policy or regulation;
 
 xi.our ability to identify, finance and consummate future alliances or acquisitions;
xii.  adverse results in litigation;
 
 xiii.xii.  disruptions in production and/or increased costs due to labor disputes;
 
 xiv.xiii.  our ability to realize the value of our timberlands;
 
 xv.xiv.  the recovery of environmentalenvironmental-related losses under our insurance policies; and
 
 xvi.xv.  the level of declared common stock dividendsour ability to identify, finance and consummate future alliances or acquisitions.

Introduction

We manufacture, both domestically and internationally, a wide array of specialty papers and engineered products. Substantially all of our revenue is earned from the sale of our products to customers in numerous markets, including book publishing, food and beverage, decorative laminates for furniture and flooring, and other highly technical niche markets. Refer to Item 1 – Business for additional information.

OurOverviewDuring the past few years, our industry has been adversely impacted by an imbalance between supply and demand for certain of our products. In this environment during 2003, we experienced declining sales volumes and lower average selling prices primarily in ourthe more commodity-like products offered by our Printing & ConvertingSpecialty Papers business unit. Two significant developments occurred over the course of the latter part of 2003 and throughout 2004 that improved our financial performance in the year over year comparison:

A number of events occurred that impacted our results of operations and financial condition in 2003, including:
1)  We undertook two major restructuring initiatives – the North America Restructuring Program in 2004 and Neenah Restructuring in 2003 (each of which is discussed in more detail in the following sections), and
2)  Demand for products improved and selling prices strengthened beginning in the second quarter of 2004, reversing deteriorating trends experienced in 2003.



- 10 -

GLATFELTER


We experienced difficult market conditions

The restructuring initiatives are focused on improving the profitability of our product mix by targeting higher value niche markets, increasing workforce productivity, and reducing costs by enhancing supply chain management strategies. Together with continued strength in our Printing & Converting Papers business unit, resulting in a decline in revenue of $35 million, or 12.3%.

We increased unit volumes in Engineered Products by 8.8% and inEurope-based Long Fiber & Overlay Papers by 8.5%.

During 2003, thebusiness unit and improved market conditions in North America, these actions contributed to a widening gross margin and increased gross profit. Our operating results also reflect increasing raw material prices particularly pulp and energy related costs and affects of a weaker U.S. dollar weakened byon translated international operations.

In addition, over the past two years we generated gains of approximately 17% compared to$89.1 million from the Euro. This favorably impacted translated resultssale of operations by approximately $4.2non-strategic timberlands and the corporate aircraft. We were also successful in collecting $32.8 million in 2003.

insurance recoveries related to environmental claims. These proceeds were primarily used to reduce our debt levels.

The benefit reportedHighlights from non-cash pension income declined by $15.5 million in 2003 compared to 2002.
2004 include:

We initiated the Neenah restructuring, which included permanently shutting down certain equipment and processes, and eliminating approximately 200 positions. These actions resulted in pre-tax charges totaling $13.5 million in 2003.

-10-
GLATFELTER


•  Achieved 60% of total sales from new products introduced in the last five years.
•  Developed and executed the North American Restructuring Program:

We recorded an $11.5 million pre-tax charge relating to our former Ecusta Division. Of this amount, $5.5 million was to fully reserve for receivables due from parties that purchased Ecusta from us. The remaining $6.0 million is for contingent landfill closure costs.
•  Introduced improved product and service offerings for the book publishing market and increased market share in the premium book market.
•  Developed a pipeline of products to grow revenue from uncoated specialty papers.
•  Implemented a 20% workforce reduction program while maintaining full production capability at the Company’s Spring Grove facility. This program will be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2005.
•  Reduced production costs by implementing improved and expanded supply-chain management strategies in North America.
•  Reduced certain SG&A expenses.

•  Achieved strong growth in targeted markets led by a 13% increase in volume in the Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit.
•  Improved pricing in North America which more than offset raw material cost increases.
•  Enhanced financial flexibility by reducing net debt by $67 million through improved operating performance and monetization of timberland assets.

We completed a $35 million investment in a new, state-of-the-art, inclined wire papermaking machine in Gernsbach, Germany to support growth initiatives in Long Fiber & Overlay Papers.

We entered into a Consent Decree with certain governmental agencies that requires us to contribute a total of $27.0 million to fund the clean up of contamination of the Lower Fox River near our Neenah facility.

Our Board of Directors declared, effective in the third quarter of 2003, a $0.09 per common share cash dividend, or 49% lower than previous amounts. On an annualized basis, this reduced dividend will conserve approximately $15.0 million in cash.

We strengthened our financial position by completing a $37 million sale of timberlands and entered into agreements to sell an additional $31 million worth of property.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

20032004 versus 20022003

The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:

             
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 
   
Net sales $533,193 $540,347  $543,524   $533,193 
Gross profit 79,546 126,281  92,414   79,546 
Operating income 34,250 71,645  103,394   34,250 
Income from continuing operations 12,986 37,637  56,102   12,986 
Net loss from discontinued operations  (325)  (42)     (325)
Net income 12,661 37,595  56,102   12,661 
Earnings per diluted share from continuing operations 0.30 0.86  1.27   0.30 
Earnings per diluted share 0.29 0.86  1.27   0.29 
  

The consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20032004 and 20022003 include the following significant items:

               
In thousands, except per share
 After-tax
 EPS
 After-tax Diluted EPS 
 Income (loss)  Income (loss) 
2004
 
Gains on sale of timberlands and corporate aircraft $34,151 $0.78 
Insurance recoveries 21,310 0.48 
Restructuring charges  (12,723)  (0.29)
 
2003
  
Gain on sale of timberlands $19,965 $0.46  $19,965 $0.46 
Restructuring related charges  (8,582)  (0.20)
Restructuring charges  (8,582)  (0.20)
Ecusta related reserves  (7,315)  (0.17)  (7,315)  (0.17)
Asset write downs  (2,124)  (0.05)  (2,124)  (0.05)
2002
 
Escrow settlement 2,315 0.05 
Restructuring charges  (2,719)  (0.06)
Environmental matters  (1,500)  (0.03)

The above items increased earnings from continuing operations by $42.7 million, or $0.97 per diluted share in 2004, and by $1.9 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, in 2003,2003.

Business Units

As discussed in Item 1 — Business, in 2004 we changed the way we manage our business and decreased earningstransitioned from continuing operations in 2002 by $1.9 million, or $0.04 per share. The decline in earnings was primarily duethree distinct business units to lower sales volumestwo: the Europe-based Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit and selling prices inthe North America-based Specialty Papers business unit. While the Long Fiber & Overlay business Unit remains unchanged, the combination of the former Engineered Products and the Printing & Converting Papers business unitunits into Specialty Papers allows us to more effectively manage the demand planning process, optimize product mix, minimize process variability and higher costsmeet the demands of products sold, primarily dueour customers. As a result of this transition, all segment data has been restated to lower non-cash pension income, higher raw material prices, and increased market-related down time.

Business Units

We manage our organization along separate business units: Engineered Products, Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers and Printing & Converting Papers, as well as Tobacco Papers, which are sold pursuant to a supply agreement that expires in mid-2004. In the latter part of 2002, we completed the implementation of a new information system to provide, among other things, more complete business unit reporting. However, we are unable to provide detailed business unit profitability reporting for periods priorgive effect to the system implementation, including full-year 2002.further refinement of our organizational structure discussed above.



-11-
- 11 -

GLATFELTER


The following table sets forth profitability information by business unit and the composition of consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes:

         
  Year Ended
  December 31, 2003
  Operating Operating
Dollars in thousands
 Profit (Loss)
 Margin
Business Unit
        
Engineered Products $(452)  (0.3)%
Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers  14,737   10.9%
Printing and Converting Papers  (8,805)  (3.5)%
Tobacco Papers  (5,758)  (58.6)%
   
 
     
Total Business Unit  (278)  (0.1)%
Energy sales, net  10,040     
Pension income, net  17,149     
Restructuring charges – COS  (6,511)    
Restructuring charges – SG&A  (6,983)    
Unusual items  (11,501)    
Gain on disposition of plant, equipment and timberlands  32,334     
   
 
     
Total operating income  34,250     
Interest expense  (14,269)    
Other income (expense), net  435     
   
 
     
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $20,416     
   
 
   
 
 
                                     
Year Ended December 31            
In thousands Specialty Papers  Long Fiber & Overlay  Other and Unallocated  Total 
  2004   2003  2004   2003  2004   2003  2004   2003 
                 
Net sales $337,436   $357,989  $205,232   $165,389  $856   $9,815  $543,524   $533,193 
Energy sales, net  9,953    10,040                 9,953    10,040 
                     
Total revenue  347,389    368,029   205,232    165,389   856    9,815   553,477    543,233 
Cost of products sold  312,136    325,897   163,843    130,838   1,021    15,448   477,000    472,183 
                     
Gross profit (loss)  35,253    42,132   41,389    34,551   (165)   (5,633)  76,477    71,050 
SG&A  38,330    44,494   23,067    16,669   (53)   125   61,344    61,288 
Pension income                    (17,342)   (17,149)  (17,342)   (17,149)
Restructuring recorded as component of COS                        6,511       6,511 
Restructuring charges                    20,375    6,983   20,375    6,983 
Unusual items                        11,501       11,501 
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands                    (58,509)   (32,334)  (58,509)   (32,334)
Gain on insurance recoveries                    (32,785)      (32,785)    
                     
Total operating income (loss)  (3,077)   (2,362)  18,322    17,882   88,149    18,730   103,394    34,250 
Nonoperating income (expense)                (12,631)   (13,834)  (12,631)   (13,834)
                     
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $(3,077)  $(2,362) $18,322   $17,882  $75,518   $4,896  $90,763   $20,416 
                     
                                     
Supplementary Data
                                    
Net tons sold  421,504    446,110   48,528    42,993   390    6,463   470,422    495,566 
Depreciation expense $37,186   $44,216  $14,412   $11,813         $51,598   $56,029 
             

Results of individual business units are presented based on our management accounting practices and management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore, the financial results of individual business units are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined from time to time as management accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. Costs to produce products sold are allocated to the respective business unit based on standard costs and a proportion of manufacturing variances. The costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area services.

Management evaluates results of operations before energy sales, non-cash pension income, restructuring related charges, unusual items, and effects of asset dispositions and insurance recoveries because it believes this is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of business units and the extent of cash flow generated from core operations. This presentation is closely aligned with the management and operating structure of our Company.

It is also on this basis that Company’s performance is evaluated internally and by our Board of Directors.

Sales and Costs of Products Sold

                   
 Year Ended December 31
   Year Ended December 31   
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 Change
 2004 2003 Change 
Net Sales $533,193 $540,347 $(7,154)
   
Net sales $543,524   $533,193 $10,331 
Energy sales – net 10,040 9,814 226  9,953   10,040  (87)
 
 
 
 
 
 
        
Total revenues 543,233 550,161  (6,928) 553,477   543,233 10,244 
Cost of products sold 463,687 423,880 39,807 
Costs of products sold 461,063   463,687  (2,624)
 
 
 
 
 
 
        
Gross profit 79,546 126,281  (46,735) $92,414   $79,546 $12,868 
Gross margin as a percent of Net Sales  14.9%  23.4% 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        
Gross profit as a percent of Net sales  17.0%   14.9% 
  

Net sales in the Specialty Papers business unit declined $20.6 million, or 5.7% in the year-to-year comparison. Approximately $13.9 million of this decline was due to lower volume primarily attributable to the shutdown in late 2003 of a paper machine at the Neenah facility. Selling prices in this business unit declined during most of 2003, stabilized in the first quarter of 2004 and subsequently strengthened throughout the remainder of the year. Comparing the full year 2004 to 2003, average selling prices for the Specialty Papers business unit declined slightly.

Long Fiber & Overlay Papers’ net sales increased $39.8 million, or 24.1%, in the comparison due to an increase in volumes shipped, particularly in the Food and Beverage and Composite Laminates sectors, and a $16.0 million favorable effect of foreign currency translation adjustments. Although the weaker U.S. dollar favorably impacted translated net sales of international operations, it adversely affected the price competitiveness of Long Fiber & Overlay Papers’ products in certain geographic markets.



- 12 -

GLATFELTER


The following tables set forth the contribution to consolidated net sales by each business unit:

          
  Percent of Total 
  2004   2003 
    
Business Unit
         
Special Papers  62.1%   67.2%
Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers  37.8    31.0 
Tobacco Papers  0.1    1.8 
      
Total  100.0%   100.0%
    

Costs of products sold declined $2.6 million in the comparison due to lower production costs related to the decline in sales volumes in the Specialty Papers business unit, nonrecurring restructuring charges from 2003 and other cost reduction initiatives. Partially offsetting these factors was the unfavorable effect of foreign currency translation adjustments, costs associated with increased sales volume in the Long Fiber & Overlay business unit, and higher raw material and energy prices. The following table summarizes changes in costs of products sold for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the 2003.

     
  Year Ended 
In millions December 31, 2004 
  (Favorable) 
  unfavorable 
Foreign currency changes $12,322 
Lower sales volume, net  (8,262)
2003 Neenah restructuring related charges  (6,511)
Other  (173)
    
Total $(2,624)
 

Non-Cash Pension IncomeNon-cash pension income results from the considerably over-funded status of our plans. The amount of pension income recognized each year is determined using various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors, including the fair value of our pension assets as of the beginning of the year. The following summarizes non-cash pension income for each year:

              
  Year Ended December 31    
In thousands 2004   2003  Change 
    
Recorded as:
             
Costs of products sold $15,937   $15,007  $930 
SG&A expense  1,405    2,142   (737)
        
Total $17,342   $17,149  $193 
    

The following summarizes SG&A expenses, restructuring charges, gains from asset dispositions and other nonrecurring items:

              
  Year Ended December 31    
In thousands 2004   2003  Change 
    
SG&A expenses $59,939   $59,146  $793 
Restructuring charges  20,375    6,983   13,392 
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands  (58,509)   (32,334)  (26,175)
Unusual items      11,501   (11,501)
Gains from insurance recoveries $(32,785)     $(32,785)
       

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)SG&A expenses increased $0.8 million in the year-to-year comparison. The increase was primarily due to a $1.6 million unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation adjustments, higher legal and accounting and professional fees, mostly related to insurance recoveries, and costs associated with implementing the North American Restructuring Program. Lower variable compensation expenses and the impact of cost reduction initiatives substantially offset these costs.

Restructuring ChargesAs discussed earlier, we undertook two major restructuring initiatives beginning in the fourth quarter of 2003. The following table summarizes restructuring charges incurred in connection with these initiatives:

          
  Year Ended December 31 
In thousands 2004   2003 
    
Restructuring initiative:
         
North American Restructuring Program $17,187   $ 
Neenah Restructuring         
Recorded as:
         
Costs of products sold      6,511 
Restructuring charge  3,188    6,983 
      
Total Neenah  3,188    13,494 
      
Total $20,375   $13,494 
     

North American Restructuring ProgramThe North American Restructuring Program is designed to improve operating results by enhancing product and service offerings in Specialty Papers’ book publishing markets, growing revenue from uncoated specialty papers, reducing our workforce at our Spring Grove facility by approximately 20%, and implementing improved supply chain management processes. The financial benefits from these efforts began to phase-in during the third quarter of 2004, and are expected to approximate $15 million to $20 million annually, beginning in 2006. During 2005, the financial benefits are expected to increase throughout much of the year aggregating an amount under the low end of the range of ultimate benefits.

In 2004, we negotiated a new labor agreement that enabled us to reduce workforce levels at our Spring Grove, PA facility by approximately 20%. As part of the new labor agreement, we offered a voluntary early retirement benefits package to eligible employees. The



- 13 -

GLATFELTER


acceptance of these special termination benefits resulted in a charge of $16.5 million in 2004, substantially all of which was for enhanced pension benefits, post-retirement medical benefits and other related employee severance costs.

We also recorded restructuring charges totaling $0.7 million, for severance and related pension and other post employment benefits (“OPEB”) associated with the elimination of certain non-represented positions. The following table sets forth activity in the North American Restructuring Program restructuring reserve.

     
  Year Ended 
  December 31, 
In thousands 2004 
 
Beginning balance $0 
Amounts accrued  17,187 
Payments made  (644)
To be paid:    
From pension plan assets  (11,255)
As OPEB benefits  (5,228)
    
Ending balance $60 
   

The ending balance set forth above represents the portion of the North American Restructuring Program charges that is expected to require near term cash payments from us and primarily consists of severance and benefits continuation. Amounts representing enhanced pension benefits will be paid from our pension plan assets and are recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of our prepaid pension assets. The amounts for OPEB benefits were recorded as “Other long-term liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We will pay the OPEB benefits as they are incurred over the course of the affected employees’ benefit period, which could range up to 8 years.

Neenah RestructuringIn September 2003, we announced the decision to permanently shut down a paper making machine and the deinking process at our Neenah, WI facility. The abandoned machines and processes had been primarily supporting our book publishing products of the Specialty Papers business unit. This initiative resulted in the elimination of approximately 190 positions and was completed by March 31, 2004. The results of operations in 2003 include related pre-tax charges of approximately $13.5 million, of which $6.5 million are reflected in the consolidated income statements as components of costs of products sold, and $7.0 million are reflected as “restructuring charges.”

The results of operations in 2004 include $3.2 million of Neenah related restructuring charges, of which $3.0 million represents a fee paid to modify a steam supply contract in connection with the restructuring initiative at the Neenah facility. The remaining amount represents adjustments to estimated benefit continuation costs.

The following table sets forth information with respect to Neenah restructuring charges:

         
  Year Ended December 31 
In thousands 2004  2003 
 
Contract modification fee $3,000  $ 
Depreciation on abandoned equipment     5,974 
Severance and benefit continuation  188   1,874 
Pension and other retirement benefits     4,878 
Other     768 
     
Total $3,188  $13,494 
     

The following table summarizes activity in the Neenah Restructuring reserve:

         
  Year Ended December 31 
In thousands 2004  2003 
 
Beginning balance $1,625  $ 
Amounts accrued  3,188   2,105 
Payments made  (4,065)  (480)
     
Ending balance $748  $1,625 
     

As of December 31, 2004, the amounts accrued related to the Neenah restructuring represent only those charges that are expected to result in cash payments and primarily consist of severance payments, benefits continuation and medical retirement benefits. The Neenah restructuring charge totaled $16.7 million, of which $6.5 million was non-cash related, and $5.4 million is to be paid out of pension plan assets.

Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and TimberlandsDuring 2004 and 2003, we completed sales of timberlands and, in 2004, the corporate aircraft. The following table summarizes these transactions.

             
Dollars in thousands Acres  Proceeds  Gain 
2004
            
Timberlands  4,482  $56,586  $55,355 
Corporate Aircraft  n/a   2,861   2,554 
Other  n/a   724   600 
         
Total     $60,171  $58,509 
         
2003            
Timberlands  25,500  $37,850  $31,234 
Other  n/a   2,892   1,100 
         
Total     $40,742  $32,334 
     

All property sales completed in 2004 were sold for cash. As consideration for the timberlands sold in 2003, we received a 10-year note from a subsidiary of The Conservation Fund in the principal amount of $37.9 million (the “Note”), which is included in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Insurance RecoveriesDuring 2004, we reached successful resolution of certain claims under insurance policies related to the Fox River environmental matter. Insurance recoveries included in the results of operations for 2004 totaled $32.8 million and were received in cash.



- 14 -

GLATFELTER


Interest ExpenseFor the year ended December 31, 2004, interest expense declined $0.9 million to $13.4 million, largely due to lower debt levels. Average outstanding debt declined $25.4 million in the year-to-year comparison.

Income TaxesOur provision for income taxes from continuing operations in 2004 and 2003, totaled $34.7 million and $7.4 million, respectively, and the effective tax rate in the same periods was 38.2% and 36.4%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the proportion of taxable income attributable to timberland sales and foreign source income, both of which are taxed at higher effective rates.

Foreign CurrencyWe own and operate paper and pulp mills in Germany, France and the Philippines. The local currency in Germany and France is the Euro, while in the Philippines the currency is the Peso. These operations generate approximately 34% of our sales and 33% of operating expenses. The translation of the results from these international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

The table below summarizes the effect from foreign currency translation on reported results compared to 2003:

     
  Year Ended 
  December 31, 
In thousands 2004 
  Favorable 
  (unfavorable) 
Net sales $15,994 
Costs of products sold  (12,322)
SG&A expenses  (1,629)
Income taxes and other  (305)
    
Net income $1,738 
 

The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or competing in multi-currency markets. The strengthening of the Euro relative to certain other currencies in 2004 compared to 2003, adversely affected the price competitiveness of our Germany-based Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit relative to certain competitors.

Discontinued Operations

In July 2003, we sold our Wisches, France subsidiary for approximately $2.0 million and the buyer’s assumption of approximately $1.1 million of debt owed to us by our subsidiary. At closing, we received $1.7 million with the remaining amounts to be paid in two annual installments, the first of which was received in July 2004. The financial results of this subsidiary are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Prior to the sale, the underlying assets were recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Accordingly, loss from discontinued operations for the year ended

December 31, 2003, includes a charge of $0.5 million, after tax, to write-down the carrying value of the assets prior to the sale. Revenue included in determining results from discontinued operations totaled $2.6 million and $3.5 million for 2003 and 2002, respectively. The financial results of this operation were previously reported in the Specialty Papers business unit.

2003 versus 2002

The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:

         
  Year Ended December 31 
In thousands 2003  2002 
 
Net sales $533,193  $540,347 
Gross profit  79,546   126,281 
Operating income  34,250   71,645 
Income from continuing operations  12,986   37,637 
Net loss from discontinued operations  (325)  (42)
Net income  12,661   37,595 
Earnings per diluted share from continuing operations  0.30   0.86 
Earnings per diluted share 0.29  0.86 
     

The consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 include the following significant items:

         
In thousands, except per share After-tax  EPS 
  Income (loss)     
2003         
Gain on sale of timberlands $19,965  $0.46 
Restructuring related charges  (8,582)  (0.20)
Ecusta related reserves  (7,315)  (0.17)
Asset write downs  (2,124)  (0.05)
         
2002        
Escrow settlement  2,315   0.05 
Restructuring charges  (2,719)  (0.06)
Environmental matters  (1,500)  (0.03)
     

The above items increased earnings from continuing operations by $1.9 million, or $0.04 per diluted share in 2003, and decreased earnings from continuing operations in 2002 by $1.9 million, or $0.04 per share. The decline in earnings was primarily due to lower sales volumes and selling prices in the Specialty Papers business unit and higher costs of products sold, primarily due to lower non-cash pension income, higher raw material prices, and increased market-related down time.



- 15 -

GLATFELTER


Business Units

The following table sets forth profitability information by business unit and the composition of consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes:

                                      
Year Ended December 31             
In thousandsSpecialty PapersLong Fiber & OverlayOther and UnallocatedTotal 
  2003   2002  2003   2002  2003   2002  2003   2002  
                
Net sales $357,989   $384,784  $165,389   $135,715  $9,815   $19,848  $533,193   $540,347  
Energy sales, net  10,040    9,814                  10,040    9,814  
                
Total revenue  368,029    394,598   165,389    135,715   9,815    19,848   543,233    550,161  
Costs of products sold  325,897    329,304   130,838    102,767   15,448    18,709   472,183    450,780  
                
Gross profit  42,132    65,294   34,551    32,948   (5,633)   1,139   71,050    99,381  
SG&A  44,494    43,347   16,669    15,193   125    907   61,288    59,447  
Pension income                    (17,149)   (32,648)  (17,149)   (32,648) 
Restructuring recorded as component of COS                    6,511       6,511      
Restructuring charges                    6,983    4,249   6,983    4,249  
Unusual items                    11,501    (2,008)  11,501    (2,008) 
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands                    (32,334)   (1,304)  (32,334)   (1,304) 
                
Total operating income (loss)  (2,362)   21,947   17,882    17,755   18,730    31,943   34,250    71,645  
Nonoperating income (expense)                (13,834)   (12,516)  (13,834)   (12,516) 
                
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $(2,362)  $21,947  $17,882   $17,755  $4,896   $19,427  $20,416   $59,129  
                
                                      
Supplementary Data
                                     
Net tons sold  446,110    474,343   42,993    40,751   6,463    13,109   495,566    528,203  
Depreciation expense $44,216   $35,438  $11,813   $9,565         $56,029   $45,003  
              

Sales and Costs of Products Sold

             
  Year Ended December 31    
In thousands 2003  2002  Change 
 
Net sales $533,193  $540,347  $(7,154)
Energy sales – net  10,040   9,814   226 
   
Total revenues  543,233   550,161   (6,928)
Costs of products sold  463,687   423,880   39,807 
   
Gross profit $79,546  $126,281  $(46,735)
             
Gross profit as a percent of Net sales  14.9%  23.4%    
 

The decline in net sales was primarily due to a $19.8 million net sales volume-related decline as lower volumes in our Printing & ConvertingSpecialty Papers and tobacco papers more than offset sales volume growth in our Engineered Products and Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business units. In addition each business unit experienced lower average selling prices, in constant currency rates, aggregating $13.3 million. The impact of lower sales volumes and selling prices was partially offset by a $27.9 million favorable effect of a weaker U.S. dollar on translated international results.

The following tables set forth net sales information by business unit:

         
  Year Ended December 31
In thousands
 2003
 2002
Business Unit
        
Engineered Products $137,246  $123,610 
Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers  135,047   110,441 
Printing and Converting Papers  251,085   286,448 
Tobacco Papers  9,815   19,848 
   
 
   
 
 
Total $533,193  $540,347 
   
 
   
 
 
         
  Percent of Total
  2003
 2002
Business Unit
        
Engineered Products  25.8%  22.8%
Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers  25.3   20.5 
Printing and Converting Papers  47.1   53.0 
Tobacco Papers  1.8   3.7 
   
 
   
 
 
Total  100.0%  100.0%
   
 
   
 
 

Costs of products sold increased $39.8 million in the comparison due to the following significant items:

     
  Year Ended 
In millionsDecember 31, 2003 
  (Favorable) 
  unfavorable 
Foreign currency changes $19.8 
Lower pension income  11.9 
Higher raw material and energy prices  10.4 
Restructuring related  6.5 
Lower sales volume  (17.9)
Other  9.1 
    
Total $39.8 
 

-12-
GLATFELTER


In the preceding table, “other” primarily consisted of depreciation, market-related downtime and assets write-offs.

The market price of natural gas is a significant component of our Neenah facility’s production costs as the cost of the facility’s steam is dependent on natural gas market prices. During 2003 we experienced increases in natural gas market prices. Based on expected production levels and contractual obligations, a $1 per decatherm increase in the cost of natural gas is expected to increase the cost of operating our Neenah facility by approximately $1.4 million per year. Thus far in 2004, natural gas market prices appear to have stabilized and we expect the price to decline moderately compared with the levels during 2003.

Non-Cash Pension Income

Non-cash pension income results from the considerably over-funded status of our plans. The amount of pension income recognized each year is determined using various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors, including the fair value of our pension assets as of the beginning of the year. Because the value of our plan assets as of January 1, 2003, was lower than the previous year and due to changes in actuarial assumptions, the amount of non-cash pension income recognized in 2003 was less than 2002.



-16-

GLATFELTER


The following summarizes non-cash pension income for each year.

             
  Year Ended December 31    
In thousands 2003  2002  Change 
 
Recorded as:
            
Costs of products sold $15,007  $26,900  $(11,893)
SG&A expense  2,142   5,748   (3,606)
   
Total $17,149  $32,648  $(15,499)
 

Non-cash pension income in 2004 is expected to approximate amounts recognized in 2003.

Operating Expenses

             
  Year Ended December 31    
In thousands 2003  2002  Change 
 
SG&A expenses $59,146  $53,699  $5,447 
Restructuring charge  6,983   4,249   2,734 
Unusual items  11,501   (2,008)  13,509 
Gain on sale of plant, equipment and timberlands  (32,334)  (1,304)  (31,030)
 

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)SG&A expenses increased $5.4 million during 2003 compared to 2002. During 2003, a weaker U.SU.S. dollar resulted in a $2.6 million increase in translated SG&A expenses for our international operations. The remaining increase was primarily due to a lower benefit from non-cash pension income and higher depreciation, primarily attributable to an information technology system implemented in the latter part of 2002.

Restructuring ChargechargeIn September 2003, we announcedrecorded restructuring charges related to the decisionNeenah Restructuring initiative. For a complete discussion of this charge, refer to permanently shut down a paper making machine and the deinking process at our Neenah, WI facility. The abandoned machines and processes had been primarily supporting our Printing & Converting Papers business unit. The Neenah restructuring was initiated to allow us to reallocate resources to more fully support opportunities in higher growth, more profitable specialty markets. These initiatives will result in the eliminationanalysis of approximately 200 positions and is expected to be completed by March 31, 2004. The results2004 versus 2003 section of operations include related pre-tax charges of approximately $13.5 million, of which $6.5 million are reflected in the consolidated income statements as components of costs of products sold, and $7.0 million are reflected as “restructuring charges.”

The following table sets forth information with respect to Neenah restructuring charges.

     
  Year Ended
In thousands
 December 31, 2003
Depreciation on abandoned equipment $5,974 
Severance and benefit continuation  1,874 
Pension and other retirement benefits  4,878 
Other  768 
   
 
 
Total $13,494 
   
 
 

Additional charges may be required in 2004 depending on the resolution of certain contractual matters.

this Item 7. In 2002 we recorded a $4.2 million charge related to a workforce reduction at our corporate and Spring Grove, PA locations.

Unusual ItemsUnusual items during 2003 reflect a charge of $11.5 million related to our former Ecusta Division, which was sold in 2001. Under the Ecusta Division acquisition agreement, we are indemnified for certain liabilities that have been assumed by the buyers. We had previously accrued liabilities related to certain post-retirement benefits, workers compensation claims and vendor payables and established a corresponding receivable due from the buyers. We paid the portion of these liabilities that became due and sought reimbursement from the buyers, which, to date, they have refused. The 2003 charge includes $5.5 million to fully reserve such receivables and an additional $6.0 million related to contingent landfill closure costs at the Ecusta facility. In 2002, we recognized a $3.5 million gain from the settlement of an escrow account with the previous owners of our Schoeller & Hoesch Division. This was partially offset by a $1.5 million charge for certain environmental matters related to the Pennsylvania DEP.

-13-
GLATFELTER


Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and TimberlandsDuring 2003 we recognized a net gain from the sale of plant, equipment and timberlands of $32.3 million. This primarily includes a $31.2 million pre-tax gain from the March 2003 sale of approximately 25,500 acres of timberlands (the “Maryland Timberlands”) to a subsidiary of The Conservation Fund, a non-profit land conservation fund (the “Timberland Buyer”).

In the fourth quarter of 2003, we entered into agreements to sell approximately 2,300 acres of timberlands for an aggregate cash consideration of approximately $30.8 million, of which $24.8 million has been completed to date. The sales are expected to result in a pre-tax gain of approximately $29 million during the first quarter of 2004.

Foreign Currency

We own and operate paper and pulp mills in Germany, France and the Philippines. The local currency in Germany and France is the Euro, while in the Philippines the currency is the Peso. These operations generate approximately 31% of our sales and operating expenses. The translation of the results from these international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

The following table summarizes the effect from foreign currency translation on reported results compared to 2002:

        
 Year Ended Year Ended 
In thousands
 December 31, 2003
In thousandsDecember 31, 2003 
 Favorable Favorable 
 (unfavorable) (unfavorable) 
Net sales $27,869  $27,869 
Costs of products sold  (19,776)  (19,776)
SG&A expenses  (2,648)  (2,648)
Income taxes and other  (1,278)  (1,278)
 
 
    
Net income $4,170  $4,167 
 
 
 

The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or competing in a global, multi-currency environment. In 2003, the strengthening of the Euro relative to certain other currencies adversely affecting average selling prices, in the functional currency, of products sold by S&H.

Discontinued Operations



In July 2003, we sold our Wisches, France subsidiary for approximately $2.0 million and the assumption of approximately $1.1 million of debt owed to us by our subsidiary. At closing, we received $1.7 million and the remaining amounts are to be paid in annual installments over two years beginning July 2004. The financial results of this subsidiary are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Prior to the sale, the underlying assets were recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Accordingly, loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2003, includes a charge of $0.5 million, after tax, to write-down the carrying value of the assets prior to the sale. Revenue included in determining results from discontinued operations totaled $2.6 million and $3.5 million for 2003 and 2002, respectively. The financial results of this operation were previously reported in the Engineered Products business unit.-17-

2002 versus 2001

For the year ended December 31, 2002, net income totaled $37.6 million, or $.86 per diluted share, compared with $7.0 million and $.16 per diluted share in 2001. Unusual items discussed in detail below affect the comparison of reported results.

Net Sales

Net sales decreased $92.3 million in 2002 compared with 2001. The decline was substantially due to the Ecusta divestiture in 2001. Excluding Ecusta Division net sales in 2001, net sales declined $1.5 million, or 0.2%. On this basis, the decline was primarily due to the effect of a 3.5% decrease in average net selling price partially offset by the effect of a 2.1% increase in net sales volume. The decline in average net selling price was also mitigated by the effect of a stronger Euro relative to the U.S. dollar resulting in an increase of approximately $6.4 million in translated net sales in 2002 versus 2001.

During 2002, sales volume for our Engineered Products increased by approximately 12% compared to 2001, offset somewhat by lower average selling prices. Our Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit experienced increased sales volume for its products that more than offset adverse pricing pressures it experienced during the year. In the Printing & Converting Papers business unit, our net sales volume was substantially the same as the prior year at lower average selling prices. During the fourth quarter of 2002, Printing & Converting Papers experienced declining prices, reversing favorable pricing trends that were seen during the third quarter of 2002.

Cost of Products Sold and Gross Profit

Cost of products sold declined $77.3 million, or 15.4%, in the year-to-year comparison. Excluding the Ecusta Division, cost of products sold increased $1.8 million, or 0.3%. The increase in cost of products sold is primarily due to the increase in net sales volume. Cost of products sold is approximately $4.3 million higher in 2002 than in 2001 due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar compared to the Euro and the resulting impact on translated international results. These factors more than offset the effect of a decrease in the unit cost of pulp and benefits of our cost control initiatives. As a percent of sales, our gross margin increased to 23.0% for the full year 2002 from 22.3% in 2001. Excluding the Ecusta Division, our gross margin was slightly lower in 2002 than in 2001.

-14-
GLATFELTER


Our gross margin includes net non-cash pension income resulting from the overfunded status of our defined benefit pension plans. Cost of products sold was reduced for such income by $26.9 million in 2002 and by $24.4 million in 2001. Partially offsetting this benefit was expense attributable to other post-retirement benefits totaling $4.6 million and $2.9 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The primary cause of the increase in other-post retirement benefits was a change in our estimate of liability based upon recent claims history.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

SG&A expenses declined $6.5 million, or 10.8%, in the year-to-year comparison due to the Ecusta divestiture together with disciplined cost control initiatives. Excluding the Ecusta Division, SG&A expenses declined 1.4%. SG&A is approximately $0.7 million higher in 2002 than in 2001 due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar compared to the Euro, and the resulting impact on translated U.S. dollar results. Costs incurred in 2002 include resources dedicated to implementing our strategic initiatives, including depreciation expense and increased service fees related to implementing information technology. SG&A expenses were also lower in 2002 compared with 2001 due to a decrease in compensation expense related to certain stock awards that varies with the price of our common stock. Our common stock price declined during 2002.

Net non-cash pension income reduced reported SG&A expenses $5.7 million in 2002 and $6.3 million in 2001. Post-retirement expense included in SG&A expenses was $1.0 million and $0.5 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The primary cause of the increase in post-retirement expense was a change in our estimate of liability based upon recent claims history.

Gains on Sales of Plant, Equipment and Timberlands

During 2002, we recorded $1.3 million gain from the sale of certain fixed assets compared with a gain of $2.0 million in 2001. The gain in 2001 primarily resulted from the sale of a 413-acre tract of land from which we recognized a $1.7 million gain. There were no significant sales of properties completed in 2002.

Unusual Items

Unusual items totaled a gain of $2.0 million and a charge of $60.9 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Amounts recorded in 2002 included a $3.5 million one-time, pretax gain for the settlement of certain escrow claims, including interest and associated liabilities related to the 1998 acquisition of our S&H subsidiary. The gain was partially offset by a $1.5 million liability related to the Pennsylvania DEP.

On August 9, 2001, we completed the sale of the Ecusta Division, consisting of our Ecusta paper-making facility and two of its operating subsidiaries, including plant and equipment, inventory, accounts receivable and essentially all other operating assets and certain other receivables related to our Tobacco Papers business. As part of this transaction, the buyer assumed certain liabilities related to the operation of the Ecusta Division. Our total charge to earnings associated with the sale was $58.4 million, including a $50.0 million impairment charge recognized during the second quarter of 2001. We also recognized a $2.5 million pretax charge in the second quarter of 2001 due to the settlement of an environmental matter in connection with the Spring Grove, Pennsylvania facility’s wastewater discharge permit.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our business is capital intensive and requires significant expenditures for new or enhanced equipment, for environmental compliance matters and to support our business strategy and research and development efforts.

The following table summarizes cash flow information for each of the years presented.

              
 Year Ended Year Ended 
 December 31
 December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2004   2003 
   
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $32,219 $87,950  $15,566   $32,219 
Cash provided by (used for)    
Operating activities 46,996 77,706  39,584   46,996 
Investing activities, net  (62,367)  (49,610)
Investing activities 42,109    (62,367)
Financing activities  (2,462)  (84,605)  (59,753)   (2,462)
Discontinued operations  (304) 288      (304)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 1,484 490  2,445   1,484 
 
 
 
 
      
Net cash used  (16,653)  (55,731)
Net cash provided (used) 24,385    (16,653)
 
 
 
 
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $15,566 $32,219  $39,951   $15,566 
 
 
 
 
    

The declinedecrease in cash generated from operations iswas primarily due to payments for federal income taxes and to modify the steam contract at the Neenah facility, as well as changes in our resultsworking capital. These uses of operations discussed previouslycash were partially offset by the $6.3 million net benefit of insurance recoveries in this report.excess of cash payments pursuant to the Fox River Consent Decree.

Cash spentThe changes in 2003 on investing activities primarilycash flows reflects the investments madecash proceeds in 2004 from dispositions of property, equipment and timberlands and lower capital expenditures, which totaled $18.6 million in 2004 and $66.8 million in 2003. Prior to install2004, we completed certain major capital projects, including a state-of-the-art inclined wire paper machine (“PM #9”) to support growth opportunities in the Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers business unitrebuild and capital expenditures for the “New Century” project. In 2002, cash spent on investing activities included the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system (“IMPACT”), the New Century Project, and the rebuild of PM #9. The New Century Project is a substantially completed initiative at our Spring Grove facility under the Voluntary Advanced Technical Incentive Program as set forth by the EPA’s “Cluster Rule”. This project includes new hardwood brownstock washing, installation of hardwood oxygen delignification,

-15-
GLATFELTER


100% chlorine dioxide substitution on both the hardwood and softwood fiber lines, and a hardwood ozone bleaching system. To comply with the Cluster Rule, we will also install equipment to reduce air emissions of air pollutants and odorous compounds.

The following table summarizes capital spending by major project, by year:

         
  Year Ended
  December 31
In millions
 2003
 2002
PM #9 $29.6  $5.6 
New Century Project  22.2   9.9 
IMPACT     19.9 
Others  15.0   15.7 
   
 
   
 
 
Total $66.8  $51.1 
   
 
   
 
 

Capital expenditures in 2004 are expected to approximate one-half of our annual depreciation expense.environmental related initiatives. The reduction in capital expenditures is not expected to have a significant effect on our results of operations, as we will continue to complete necessary repairs and maintenance activities. We currently expect capital expenditures in 2005 to approximate $30 million to $35 million.

Excess cash flow from operating and investing activities during 2004 were used to reduce long-term debt by approximately $42 million and to make dividend payments.

The following table sets forth our outstanding long-term indebtedness:

             
 Year Ended Year Ended 
 December 31
 December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2004   2003 
   
Revolving credit facility, due June 2006 $64,047 $67,681  $23,277   $64,047 
67/8% Notes, due July 2007
 150,000 150,000  150,000   150,000 
Note payable – SunTrust, due March 2008 34,000   34,000   34,000 
Other notes, various 1,228 1,823  446   1,228 
 
 
 
 
      
Total long-term debt 249,275 219,504  207,723   249,275 
Less current portion  (806)  (795)  (446)   (806)
 
 
 
 
      
Long-term debt, excluding current portion $248,469 $218,709  $207,277   $248,469 
 
 
 
 
    

The significant terms of the debt obligations are set forth in Item 78 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 17.16.

Sales of TimberlandsDuring 2003, we completed the sale of approximately 25,500 acres of timberlands (the “Maryland Timberlands”) to a subsidiary of The Conservation Fund, a non-profit land conservation fund (the “Timberland Buyer”). As consideration for the sale of the Maryland Timberlands, we received a 10-year note from the Timberland Buyer in the principal amount of $37.9 million (the “Note”). The Note bears interest at 3.22% per annum with interest-only payments due in quarterly installments. After five years, the interest rate on the Note will be adjusted to the then existing bank prime rate. The full amount of the Note is secured by a letter of credit issued by a financial institution. We pledged the Note2004 and letter of credit as collateral for a $34.0 million term loan payable to SunTrust.

In connection with the Maryland Timberland sale, we entered into a Supply Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Timberland Buyer pursuant to which we agreed to purchase from the Timberland Buyer at market prices, a minimum annual amount of pine pulpwood averaging 34,425 tons per annum over the eight-year term of the Agreement.

Dividend PaymentsDuring 2003, and 2002, cash dividends paid on common stock totaled $26.9$15.8 million and $30.3$26.9 million, respectively. Our Board of Directors determines what, if any, dividends will be paid to our shareholders. Dividend payment decisions are based upon then-existing factors and conditions and, therefore, historical trends of dividend payments are not necessarily indicative of future payments. Beginning in the third quarter of 2003, our Board of Directors declared a $0.09 per common share quarterly cash dividend, or 49% lower than previous quarterly dividends. On an annualized basis, this reduced dividend will conserve approximately $15.0 million in cash.

In the first quarter of 2004, we expect to complete the sale of approximately 2,300 acres of timberlands for a total of $30.8 million in cash, of which $24.8 million has been received to date.

These strategic timberland sales are designed to monetize the underlying value of certain assets.

Environmental MattersWe are subject to loss contingencies resulting from regulation by various federal, state, local and foreign governmental authorities with respect to the environmental impact of mills we operate, or have operated. To comply with environmental laws and regulations, we have incurred substantial capital and operating expenditures in past years. We anticipate that environmental regulation of our operations will continue to become more burdensome and that capital and operating expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. In addition, we may incur obligations to remove or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment resulting from our operations, including the restoration of natural resources and liability for personal injury and for damages to property and natural resources. Because environmental regulations are not consistent worldwide, our ability to compete in the world marketplace may be adversely affected by capital and operating expenditures required for environmental compliance. (SeeSee Item 8 – Financial Statements – Note 19 for a summary of significant environmental matters.)

As more fully discussed in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplemental Data – Note 19 we entered into a Consent Decree with the various governmental agencies related to the remediation of Operable Unit 1 (“OU1”) of the Lower Fox River.

-16-
GLATFELTER


The OU1 Consent Decree requires the Company to pay amounts under the following schedule:

     
In thousands
    
November 1, 2003 $525 
January 31, 2004  250 
March 31, 2004  10,500 
June 30, 2004  15,750 
   
 
 
Total $27,025 
   
 
 

The amounts due on November 1, 2003 and January 31, 2004, were paid.

In February 2004, we entered into settlement agreements with certain of our insurance carriers relating to coverage for various environmental liabilities incurred by the Company associated with the Lower Fox River and Bay of Green Bay in Wisconsin. Under terms of the settlement agreements, the insurance carriers agreed to pay us an aggregate of $25.2 million. We expect to receive the settlement proceeds in the first quarter of 2004. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any amounts for such recoveries.

We expect to meet all of our other near- and longer-term cash needs from a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents, sale of additional timberlands, proceeds from insurance recoveries, our existing credit facility or other bank lines of credit and other long-term debt. However, as discussed in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 19, an unfavorable outcome of various environmental matters could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and/or results of operations.



-18-

GLATFELTER


Off-Balance-Sheet ArrangementsAs of December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, we had not entered into any off-balance-sheet arrangements. AllA financial derivative financial instrumentsinstrument to which we are a party and guarantees of indebtedness, which solely consists of ourobligations of subsidiaries obligations,and a

partnership, are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets included herein in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

-17-


GLATFELTER


Contractual ObligationsThe following table sets forth contractual obligations as of December 31, 2003.2004.

                   
 Payments Due During the Payments Due During the Year 
 Year Ended December 31,
 Ended December 31, 
 2005 to 2007 to 2009 and 2006 to2008 to2010 and 
In thousands
 Total
 2004
 2006
 2008
 beyond
 Total200520072009beyond 
Long-term debt(1)
 $249,275 $806 $64,469 $184,000 $  $207,723  $446 $173,277 $34,000 $ 
Operating leases(2)
 18,277 3,674 3,023 1,390 10,190   15,435 2,289 2,225 1,428 9,493 
Purchase obligations(3)
 153,928 40,615 19,776 16,639 76,898  145,913 43,059 29,317 15,744 57,793 
Other long term obligations(4)
 53,467 6,694 12,118 10,731 23,924  92,357 7,168 43,235 12,866 29,088 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Total $474,947 $51,789 $99,386 $212,760 $111,012  $461,428 $52,962 $248,054 $64,038 $96,374 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


(1) Represents principal payments due on long-term debt. We have $150 million of debt maturing in July 2007 and bearing a fixed rate of interest at 67/8%, payable semiannually, $34 million note maturing in March 2008 and bearing a fixed rate of interest of 3.82%. In addition, at December 31, 2003, $642004, $23 million, bearing a variable interest rate, was outstanding under our revolving credit facility that matures in June 2006.
 
(2) Represents rental agreements for various land, buildings, and computer and office equipment.

(3) Represents open purchase order commitments and other obligations, primarily for steam and pulpwood contracts with minimum annual purchase obligations. In certain situations, prices are subject to variations based on market prices. In such situations, the information above is based on prices in effect at December 31, 20032004 or expectations based on historical experience and/or current market conditions.

(4) Represents expected benefits to be paid pursuant to medical retirement plans and nonqualified pension plans over the next ten years.years and $29 million related to cross currency swap maturing in June 2006.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


The preceding discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial position and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories, long-lived assets, pension and post-retirement obligations, environmental liabilities and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

We believe the following represent the most significant and subjective estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Inventory ReservesWe maintain reserves for excess and obsolete inventories to reflect our inventory at the lower of its stated cost or market value. Our estimate for excess and obsolete inventory is based upon our assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are more or less favorable than those we have projected, we may need to increase or decrease our reserves for excess and obsolete inventories, which could affect our reported results of operations.

Long-lived AssetsWe evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets, including property, equipment and intangible assets periodically or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Our evaluations include analyses based on the cash flows generated by the underlying assets, profitability information, including estimated future operating results, trends or other determinants of fair value. If the value of an asset determined by these evaluations is less than its carrying amount, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the asset. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of the related business may indicate an inability to recover the carrying value of the assets, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.



- 19 -

GLATFELTER


Pension and Other Post-Retirement ObligationsAccounting for defined-benefit pension plans, and any curtailments thereof, requires various assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates, expected rates of return on plan assets and future compensation growth rates. Accounting for our retiree medical plans, and any curtailments thereof, also requires various assumptions, which include, but are not limited to, discount rates and annual rates of increase in the per capita costs of health care benefits. We evaluate these assumptions at least once each year or as facts and circumstances dictate and make changes as conditions warrant. Changes to these assumptions will increase or decrease our reported income, which will result in changes to the recorded benefit plan assets and liabilities.

-18-
GLATFELTER


Environmental LiabilitiesWe maintain accruals for losses associated with environmental obligations when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing legislation and remediation technologies. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions continue and/or further legal or technical information develops. Such undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other claims against third parties. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties, including insurance carriers, are recorded as assets when their receipt is assured beyond a reasonable doubt.

Income TaxesWe record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in our balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. These deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such amounts are expected to reverse or be utilized. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies. If we continue to operate at a loss in certain jurisdictions or are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required to increase the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets resulting in a substantial increase in our effective tax rate and a material adverse impact on our reported results.

Other significant accounting policies, not involving the same level of uncertainties as those discussed above, are nevertheless important to an understanding of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional accounting policies.



ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

                                                      
 Year Ended December 31
 At December 31, 2003
 Year Ended December 31 At December 31, 2004 
Dollars in thousands
 2004
 2005
 2006
 2007
 2008
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Carrying Value Fair Value 
Long-term debt
  
Average principal outstanding  
At fixed interest rates $185,029 $184,202 $184,000 $115,250 $8,500 $185,228 $198,637  $184,225 $184,000 $115,250 $8,500  $184,446 $192,125 
At variable interest rates 64,047 64,047 30,707   64,047 64,047  23,277 23,277    23,277 23,277 
Weighted-average interest rate  
On fixed interest rate debt  6.30%  6.31%  6.31%  5.97%  3.82%   6.31%  6.31%  5.97%  3.82%  
On variable interest rate debt 2.69 2.51 2.51    2.96 3.05    
 
Cross-currency swap
  
Pay variable – EURIBOR 72,985 72,985 34,993  (22,034)  (22,034)
Pay variable ��� EURIBOR 72,985 34,993    $(29,552) $(29,552)
Variable rate payable  2.89%  2.89%  2.89%   2.92%  2.92%    
Receive variable – US$ LIBOR $70,000 $70,000 $33,562  $70,000 $33,562    
Variable rate receivable  1.82%  1.82%  1.82%   3.18%  3.18%    

Our market risk exposure primarily results from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. At December 31, 2003,2004, we had long-term debt outstanding of $249.3$207.7 million, of which $64.0$23.3 million, or 25.7%11.2% was at variable interest rates.

The table above presents average principal outstanding and related interest rates for the next five years and the amountsamount of a cross-currency swap agreements.agreement. Fair values included herein have been determined based upon rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Variable-rate debt outstanding represents borrowings under our revolving credit facility that incur interest based on the domestic prime rate or a Eurocurrency rate, at our option, plus a margin. At December 31, 2003,2004, the interest rate paid was 2.69%2.96%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in the interest rate on variable rate debt would increase or decrease annual interest expense by $0.6$0.2 million.

At December 31, 2003,2004, we had a cross-currency swap agreement outstanding with a termination date of June 24, 2006. Under this transaction, we swapped $70.0 million for approximately €73 million, and will pay interest on the Euro



- 20 -

GLATFELTER


portion of the swap at a floating Eurocurrency Rate (EURIBOR), plus applicable margins and will receive interest on the dollar portion of the swap at a floating U.S. dollar LIBOR rate, plus applicable margins. The cross-currency swap is designed to provide protection from the impact that changes in currency rates have on certain U.S. dollar-denominated inter-company obligations recorded at our S&H subsidiary in Gernsbach, Germany.

The cross

-19-
GLATFELTER


currency swaps areswap is recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet under the caption “Other long-term liabilities.” Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings as “Other income (expense)” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Changes in fair value of the cross-currency swap transaction are

substantially offset by changes in the value of U.S. dollar-denominated inter-company obligations when they are re-measured in Euros, the functional currency of S&H (See(see Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 18)17).

We are subject to certain risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are conducted in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. During year ended December 31, 2003,2004, approximately 69%67% of our net sales were shipped from the United States, 26%29% from Germany, and 5%4% from other international locations.



-20-
- 21 -

GLATFELTER


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORTManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of P. H. Glatfelter Company (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the chief executive and chief financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

As of December 31, 2004, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 is effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized

acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein, which expresses unqualified opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.

The Company’s management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all frauds. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
Its



- 22 -

GLATFELTER


Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of P. H. Glatfelter Company

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that P. H. Glatfelter Company and Directors:subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial

statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, of the Company and our report dated March 15, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2005



- 23 -

GLATFELTER


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
P. H. Glatfelter Company

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003.2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditingthe standards generally accepted inof the United States of America.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries atas of December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003,2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussedWe have also audited, in Noteaccordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 15, to2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the consolidatedeffectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial statements,reporting and an unqualified opinion on the Company adopted Statementeffectiveness of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” effective January 1, 2002.the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 10, 200415, 2005



-21-
- 24 -

GLATFELTER


P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

                 
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In thousands, except per share amounts
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004   2003 2002 
  
   
Net sales $533,193 $540,347 $632,602  $543,524   $533,193 $540,347 
Energy sales – net 10,040 9,814 9,661  9,953   10,040 9,814 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Total revenues 543,233 550,161 642,263  553,477   543,233 550,161 
Cost of products sold 463,687 423,880 501,142 
Costs of products sold 461,063   463,687 423,880 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Gross profit 79,546 126,281 141,121  92,414   79,546 126,281 
Operating expenses 
   
Selling, general and administrative expenses 59,146 53,699 60,225  59,939   59,146 53,699 
Restructuring charges 6,983 4,249   20,375   6,983 4,249 
Unusual items 11,501  (2,008) 60,908     11,501  (2,008)
Gains on disposition of plant, equipment and timberlands, net  (32,334)  (1,304)  (2,015)  (58,509)   (32,334)  (1,304)
Insurance recoveries  (32,785)    
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Total operating expenses 45,296 54,636 119,118 
Total  (10,980)  45,296 54,636 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Operating income 34,250 71,645 22,003  103,394   34,250 71,645 
Other nonoperating income (expense)              
Interest expense  (14,269)  (15,103)  (15,628)  (13,385)   (14,269)  (15,103)
Interest income 1,820 1,571 3,589  2,012   1,820 1,571 
Other – net  (1,385) 1,016 1,558 
Other — net  (1,258)   (1,385) 1,016 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Total other income (expense)  (13,834)  (12,516)  (10,481)
Total other nonoperating income (expense)  (12,631)   (13,834)  (12,516)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Income from continuing operations before income taxes 20,416 59,129 11,522  90,763   20,416 59,129 
Income tax provision 7,430 21,492 4,693  34,661   7,430 21,492 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Income from continuing operations 12,986 37,637 6,829  56,102   12,986 37,637 
Discontinued operations             
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (513)  (64) 198 
Income tax provision (benefit)  (188)  (22) 69 
Loss from discontinued operations     (513)  (64)
Income tax benefit     (188)  (22)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (325)  (42) 129 
Loss from discontinued operations     (325)  (42)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net income $12,661 $37,595 $6,958  $56,102   $12,661 $37,595 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
Basic earnings per share
    
Income from continuing operations $0.30 $0.87 $0.16  $1.28   $0.30 $0.87 
Loss from discontinued operations  (0.01)        (0.01)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net income $0.29 $0.87 $0.16  $1.28   $0.29 $0.87 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
   
Diluted earnings per share
    
Income from continuing operations $0.30 $0.86 $0.16  $1.27   $0.30 $0.86 
Loss from discontinued operations  (0.01)        (0.01)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net income $0.29 $0.86 $0.16  $1.27   $0.29 $0.86 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

-22-
- 25 -

GLATFELTER


P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

              
 December 31
 December 31 
Dollars in thousands, except par values
 2003
 2002
 2004   2003 
  
Assets
    
Current assets
    
Cash and cash equivalents $15,566 $32,219  $39,951   $15,566 
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts: 2003 – $3,115; 2002 – $2,211) 59,882 59,171 
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts: 2004-$2,364; 2003-$3,115)
 60,900   59,882 
Inventories 71,569 69,890  78,836   71,569 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 24,685 9,401  18,765   24,685 
Assets held for sale  4,241 
 
 
 
 
      
Total current assets 171,702 174,922  198,452   171,702 
   
Plant, equipment and timberlands – net
 542,960 517,053  520,412   542,960 
   
Other assets
 312,357 261,227  333,406   312,357 
 
 
 
 
      
Total assets $1,027,019 $953,202  $1,052,270   $1,027,019 
     
 
 
 
 
    
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
    
Current liabilities
    
Current portion of long-term debt $806 $795  $446   $806 
Short-term debt 5,000 1,028  3,503   5,000 
Accounts payable 31,472 28,866  30,174   31,472 
Dividends payable 3,942 7,638  3,955   3,942 
Environmental liabilities 27,000   7,715   27,000 
Other current liabilities 44,250 46,847  58,214   44,250 
Liabilities of discontinued operations  1,608 
 
 
 
 
      
Total current liabilities 112,470 86,782  104,007   112,470 
   
Long-term debt
 248,469 218,709  207,277   248,469 
   
Deferred income taxes
 207,834 183,758  212,074   207,834 
   
Other long-term liabilities
 86,815 90,120  108,542   86,815 
 
 
 
 
      
Total liabilities 655,588 579,369  631,900   655,588 
   
Commitments and contingencies
        
   
Shareholders’ equity
    
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized – 120,000,000 shares; issued – 54,361,980 shares (including shares in treasury: 2003 – 10,579,543; 2002 - 10,717,824) 544 544 
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized – 120,000,000 shares; issued – 54,361,980 shares (including shares in treasury: 2004 –10,412,222; 2003 - - 10,579,543) 544   544 
Capital in excess of par value 40,469 40,798  41,828   40,469 
Retained earnings 484,756 495,278  525,056   484,756 
Deferred compensation  (1,275)   
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 2,690  (3,708) 8,768   2,690 
 
 
 
 
      
 528,459 532,912  574,921   528,459 
Less cost of common stock in treasury  (157,028)  (159,079)  (154,551)   (157,028)
 
 
 
 
      
Total shareholders’ equity 371,431 373,833  420,370   371,431 
 
 
 
 
      
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $1,027,019 $953,202  $1,052,570   $1,027,019 
 
 
 
 
      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

-23-
- 26 -

GLATFELTER


P.H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

                   
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004   2003 2002 
  
Operating activities
    
Net income $12,661 $37,595 $6,958  $56,102   $12,661 $37,595 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (325)  (42) 129 
Loss from discontinued operations     (325)  (42)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Income from continuing operations 12,986 37,637 6,829  56,102   12,986 37,637 
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by continuing operations:    
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 56,029 45,003 44,815  51,598   56,029 45,003 
Pension income  (17,149)  (32,648)  (30,678)  (17,342)   (17,149)  (32,648)
Restructuring charges and unusual items 16,483   17,640  (2,008)
Deferred income tax provision 7,779 17,913 13,554  17,364   7,779 17,913 
Loss (gain) on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands  (32,334)  (1,304)  (2,015)
Unusual items 11,501  (2,008) 60,908 
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net  (58,509)   (32,334)  (1,304)
Other 745 1,235 1,681  655   745 1,235 
Change in operating assets and liabilities          
Accounts receivable 4,399 5,969  (14,342) 470   4,399 5,969 
Inventories 3,060  (2,816) 3,824   (4,276)  3,060  (2,816)
Other assets and prepaid expenses  (359)  (5,201)  (4,697)  (12,721)   (359)  (5,201)
Other liabilities 339 13,926  (15,442)  (10,240)   (5,800) 13,926 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net cash provided by continuing operations 46,996 77,706 64,437  39,584   46,996 77,706 
Net cash provided (used) by discontinued operations  (244) 332 418      (244) 332 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net cash provided by operating activities 46,752 78,038 64,855  39,584   46,752 78,038 
Investing activities
    
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands  (66,758)  (51,108)  (47,805)  (18,587)   (66,758)  (51,108)
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets 2,892 1,498 2,764 
Proceeds from disposal of plant, equipment and timberlands 60,171   2,892 1,498 
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary, net of cash divested 1,499    525   1,499  
Proceeds from sale of Ecusta   14,505 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net cash used by investing activities of continuing operations  (62,367)  (49,610)  (30,536)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities of continuing operations 42,109    (62,367)  (49,610)
Net cash used by investing activities of discontinued operations  (60)  (44)  (40)     (60)  (44)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net cash used by investing activities  (62,427)  (49,654)  (30,576)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 42,109    (62,427)  (49,654)
Financing activities
    
Repayment of debt under previous revolving credit agreement   (133,027)        (133,027)
Net (repayments of) proceeds from revolving credit facility  (10,124) 68,238  (21,794)  (44,888)   (10,124) 68,238 
Proceeds from borrowing from SunTrust Financial 34,000       34,000  
Payment of dividends  (26,879)  (30,307)  (29,876)  (15,782)   (26,879)  (30,307)
Proceeds from stock options exercised 541 10,491 2,960  917   541 10,491 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net cash used by financing activities  (2,462)  (84,605)  (48,710)  (59,753)   (2,462)  (84,605)
   
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 1,484 490 336  2,445   1,484 490 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents  (16,653)  (55,731)  (14,095)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 24,385    (16,653)  (55,731)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period 32,219 87,950 102,045  15,566   32,219 87,950 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period $15,566 $32,219 $87,950  $39,951   $15,566 $32,219 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
Supplemental cash flow information
    
Cash paid (received) for    
Interest expense $16,438 $16,420 $16,455  $11,713   $13,767 $17,074 
Income taxes  (1,575)  (12,419) 13,385  3,256    (1,575)  (12,419)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

-24-
- 27 -

GLATFELTER


P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002

                                                      
 Accumulated   Accumulated   
 Common Capital in Other Total Other   
In thousands, except shares Shares Common Excess of Retained Comprehensive Treasury Shareholders’
outstanding
 Outstanding
 Stock
 Par Value
 Earnings
 Income (Loss)
 Stock
 Equity
Balance, January 1, 2001 42,390,772 $544 $41,669 $511,019 $(2,843) $(177,686) $372,703 
Comprehensive income 
Net income 6,958 6,958 
Other comprehensive income 
Reclassification adjustment for Ecusta sale included in net income, net of tax of $1,042 1,936 
Foreign currency translation adjustments  (2,963) 
Transition adjustment for interest rate swaps, net of tax of $455 845 
Change in market value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $444  (824) 
 
 
  Compre-   
Other comprehensive income  (1,006)  (1,006)
 
 
  Capital in Deferred hensive Total 
Comprehensive income 5,952 
Cash dividends declared  (29,827)  (29,827)
Delivery of treasury shares 
Performance shares 3,489  (9) 52 43 
401(k) plans 118,389  (108) 1,746 1,638 
Employee stock options exercised – net 237,771  (584) 3,544 2,960 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Common Excess of Retained Compen- Income Treasury Shareholders’ 
Balance, December 31, 2001 42,750,421 544 40,968 488,150  (3,849)  (172,344) 353,469 
In thousands, except shares outstanding Stock Par Value Earnings sation (Loss) Stock Equity 
Balance, January 1, 2002 $544 $40,968 $488,150 $(3,849) $(172,344) $353,469 
Comprehensive income  
Net income 37,595 37,595  37,595 37,595 
Other comprehensive income  
Foreign currency translation adjustments 162  162 
Change in market value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $11  (21)   (21) 
 
 
    
Other comprehensive income 141 141  141 141 
 
 
    
Comprehensive income 37,736  37,736 
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised 1,071 1,071  1,071 1,071 
Cash dividends declared  (30,467)  (30,467)  (30,467)  (30,467)
Delivery of treasury shares  
Performance shares 4,726 3 70 73  3 70 73 
401(k) plans 92,504 19 1,373 1,392  19 1,373 1,392 
Director compensation 5,705  (1) 69 68   (1) 69 68 
Employee stock options exercised – net 790,800  (1,262) 11,753 10,491   (1,262) 11,753 10,491 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Balance, December 31, 2002 43,644,156 544 40,798 495,278  (3,708)  (159,079) 373,833  544 40,798 495,278  (3,708)  (159,079) 373,833 
Comprehensive income  
Net income 12,661 12,661  12,661 12,661 
Other comprehensive income  
Foreign currency translation adjustments 6,398  6,398 
 
 
    
Other comprehensive income 6,398 6,398  6,398 6,398 
 
 
    
Comprehensive income 19,059  19,059 
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised 13 13  13 13 
Cash dividends declared  (23,183)  (23,183)  (23,183)  (23,183)
Delivery of treasury shares  
Performance shares 8,369  (13) 124 111   (13) 124 111 
401(k) plans 80,065  (207) 1,188 981   (207) 1,188 981 
Director compensation 6,560  (21) 97 76   (21) 97 76 
Employee stock options exercised – net 43,287  (101) 642 541   (101) 642 541 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Balance, December 31, 2003
 43,782,437 $544 $40,469 $484,756 $2,690 $(157,028) $371,431  544 40,469 484,756  2,690  (157,028) 371,431 
Comprehensive income 
Net income 56,102 56,102 
Other comprehensive income 
Foreign currency translation adjustments 6,078 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
Other comprehensive income 6,078 6,078 
   
Comprehensive income 62,180 
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised 38 38 
Cash dividends declared  (15,802)  (15,802)
Issuance of restricted stock units, net 1,725  (1,275)  450 
Delivery of treasury shares 
Restricted stock awards (57)   275 218 
401(k) plans  (170) 1,015 845 
Director compensation  (12) 105 93 
Employee stock options exercised – net  (165) 1,082 917 
  
Balance at December 31, 2004 $544 $41,828 $525,056 $(1,275) $8,768 $(154,551) $420,370 
  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of thesethe Consolidated Financial Statements.

-25-
- 28 -

GLATFELTER


P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.ORGANIZATION

1. ORGANIZATION

P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (“Glatfelter”) is a manufacturer of specialty papers and engineered products. Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania, our manufacturing facilities are located in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania; Neenah, Wisconsin; Gernsbach, Germany; Scaër, France and the Philippines. Our products are marketed throughout the United States and in many foreignover 80 other countries, either through wholesale paper merchants, brokers and agents or directly to customers.

2.2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of ConsolidationThe consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Glatfelter and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Accounting EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingencies as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are reasonable, based upon currently available facts and known circumstances, but recognizes that actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.

ReclassificationsCertain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto,statement of cash flows to conform to those classifications used in the current year.

Cash and Cash EquivalentsWe classify all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.

InventoriesInventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Raw materials and in-process and finished inventories of our domestic manufacturing operations are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, and the supplies inventories are valued principally using the average-cost method. Inventories at our foreign operations are valued using a method that approximates average cost.

Plant, Equipment and TimberlandsFor financial reporting purposes, depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. For income taxes purposes, depreciation is primarily calculated using accelerated methods over lives established by statute or U. S. Treasury Department procedures. Provision is made for deferred income taxes applicable to this difference.

The range of estimated service lives used to calculate financial reporting depreciation for principal items of plant and equipment are as follows:

     
Buildings 10–10 - 45 Years
Machinery and equipment 7–7 - 35 Years
Other 4–4 - 40 Years

All timber costs related to the reforestation process, including, interest, taxes, site preparation, planting, fertilization, herbicide application and thinning, are capitalized. After 20 years, the timber is considered merchantable and depletion is computed on a unit rate of usage by growing area based on estimated quantities of recoverable material. For purchases of land tracts with existing timber, inventoried merchantable timber is subject to immediate depletion based upon usage. Costs related to the purchase of pre-merchantable timber are transferred to merchantable timber over a 10-year period, whereupon it is eligible for depletion.

Estimated timber volume is based upon its current stage in the growth cycle. Growth and yield data is developed through the use of published growth and yield studies as well as our own historical experience. This data is used to calculate volumes for established timber stands. Timber is depleted on an actual usage basis. For purchased timber tracts, a systematic timber inventory is completed and volume is estimated for merchantable timber. Pre-merchantable timber of purchased tracts is estimated based upon its current stage in the growth cycle using growth and yield data.

Maintenance and repairs are charged to income and major renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time property is retired or sold, the cost and related reserve arenet carrying value is eliminated and any resultant gain or loss is included in income.



-26-
-29-

GLATFELTER


Investment SecuritiesInvestments in debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity and recorded at amortized cost in the consolidated balance sheets when we have the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity. At December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, investments in debt securities classified as held-to-maturity totaled $9.3 million and $9.8 million, and $10.1 million, respectively, and therespectively. The noncurrent portion is included in “Other assets” on the consolidated balance sheets.

Valuation of Long-lived AssetsWe evaluate long-lived assets for impairment when a specific event indicates that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed based on estimates of future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the sum of expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. An impairment loss, if any, is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Income TaxesIncome taxes are accounted for under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.reverse or be utilized. Valuation allowances, if any, are provided when a portion or all of a deferred tax asset may not be realized.

Treasury StockCommon stock purchased for treasury is recorded at cost. At the date of subsequent reissue, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock on the weighted-average cost basis.

Foreign Currency TranslationOur subsidiaries outside the United States use their local currency as the functional currency. Accordingly, translation gains and losses and the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions designated as hedges of net foreign investments are included as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Transaction gains and losses are included in income in the period in which they occur.

Revenue RecognitionWe recognize revenue on product sales when the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership. Generally, product shipments are designated f.o.b. (free on board) shipping point and accordingly, revenue is recognized at the time the product leaves Glatfelter’s plant of manufacture. We record revenue net of an allowance for customer returns.

Revenue from energy sales is recognized when electricity is delivered to the customer. Certain costs associated with the production of electricity, such as fuel, labor, depreciation and maintenance are netted against energy sales for presentation on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Costs netted against energy sales totaled $8.3 million, $7.7 million $7.1 million and $6.4$7.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 2001,2002, respectively. Our current contract to sell electricity generated in excess of our own use expires in the year 2010 and requires that the customer purchase all of our excess electricity up to a certain level. The price for the electricity is determined pursuant to a formula and varies depending upon the amount sold in any given year.

Environmental LiabilitiesAccruals for losses associated with environmental obligations are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing legislation and remediation technologies. Costs related to environmental remediation are charged to expense. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions continue and/or further legal or technical information develops. Such undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other claims against third parties. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties, including insurance carriers, are recorded as assets when their receipt is assured beyond a reasonable doubt. We have not recorded any such recoveries.

Costs related to environmental remediation are charged to expense. Environmental costs are capitalized if the costs extend the life of the asset, increase its capacity and/or mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties, including insurance carriers, are recorded as assets when their receipt is assured beyond a reasonable doubt.

Stock-based CompensationWe account for Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” Compensation expense for both restricted stock and performance stock awards is recognized ratably over the performance period based on changes in quoted market prices of Glatfelter stock and the likelihood of achieving the performance goals. This variable plan accounting recognition is due to the uncertainty of achieving performance goals and estimating the number of shares ultimately to be issued. Compensation expense for awards of nonvested Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) is recognized over their graded vesting period based on the grant-date value. The grant-date value is determined based on the grant-date closing price of Glatfelter common stock. The exercise price of all employee stock options is at least equal to their grant-date market value. Accordingly, no compensation expense is recorded for stock options granted to employees.



-27-
-30-

GLATFELTER


Pro Forma InformationNo compensation expense has been recognized for the issuance of non-qualified stock options. The weighted-average grant dategrant-date fair valuesvalue of options granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $3.31 $2.72 and 2001 were $2.72, $2.48, and $3.84, respectively.

The fair value of each option on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following weighted-average assumptions:

            
             2004 2003 2002 
 2003
 2002
 2001
  
Risk-free interest rate  3.47%  4.13%  5.57%  4.50%  3.47%  4.13%
Expected dividend yield 5.74 5.15 4.58  3.17 5.74 5.15 
Expected volatility 38.9 27.8 29.7  35.0 38.9 27.8 
Expected life 6.5 yrs 6.5 yrs 10 yrs 6.5 yrs 6.5 yrs 6.5 yrs

HadThe following table sets forth pro forma information as if compensation expense for stock optionsall stock-based compensation had been determined consistent with the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, our net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:123.

                      
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In thousands, except per share
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 
   
Net income as reported $12,661 $37,595 $6,958  $56,102   $12,661 $37,595 
Add: stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income, net of tax 346 235 475  16   346 235 
Less: stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax  (1,808)  (1,420)  (1,989)  (339)   (1,808)  (1,420)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Pro forma $11,199 $36,410 $5,444  $55,779   $11,199 $36,410 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Earnings per share    
Reported – basic $0.29 $0.87 $0.16  $1.28   $0.29 $0.87 
Pro forma – basic 0.26 0.84 0.13  1.27   0.26 0.84 
Reported – diluted 0.29 0.86 0.16  1.27   0.29 0.86 
Pro forma – diluted 0.26 0.83 0.13  1.27   0.26 0.83 
  

Financial DerivativesWe account for financial derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 138. This statement requires the recognition of the fair value of any derivative financial instrument on the balance sheet. Changes in fair value of the derivative and, in certain instances, changes in the fair value of an underlying hedged asset or liability, are recognized either through income or as a component of other comprehensive income.

Earnings Per ShareBasic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the respective periods. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of common share equivalents is considered in the diluted earnings per share computation using the treasury stock method.

Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsThe amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other assets, and short-term debt approximate fair value. Financial derivatives are recorded at fair value. The following table sets forth carrying value and fair value for investment securities and long-term debt:

              
             2004 2003 
 2003
 2002
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value 
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
 Carrying Value
 Fair Value
     
Investment securities $9,838 $11,353 $10,124 $11,934  $9,348 $10,714   $9,838 $11,353 
Long-term debt 249,275 262,684 219,504 234,119  207,723 215,402   249,275 262,684 
  

3. RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” was issued in June 2001 and applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. We adopted SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003, and it did not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of SFAS No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections,” was issued April 2002 and was effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. This statement, among other things, rescinds the requirement to classify a gain or loss upon the extinguishments of debt as an extraordinary item on the income statement. It also requires lessees to account for certain modifications to lease agreements in a manner consistent with sale-leaseback transaction accounting. We adopted SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003, and it did not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” was issued in June 2002 and requires recognition of costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. This statement was to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We adopted SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003, and it did not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In November of 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN No.

- 28 -
GLATFELTER


45”). FIN No. 45 requires entities to establish liabilities for certain types of guarantees, and expands financial statement disclosures for others. The accounting requirements of FIN No. 45 were effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, and the disclosure requirements were effective for financial statements for interim or annual periods ended



-31-

GLATFELTER


after December 15, 2002. The adoption on January 1, 2003, of FIN No. 45 did not have any significant accounting implications for us as all of our commitments and guarantees are on behalf of our subsidiaries.

SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” was issued in April 2003, and it amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments including derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. This standard was effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and its adoption did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” This Statement requires an issuer to classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). SFAS No. 150 was effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, except for certain provisions that were deferred, and otherwise was effective at the beginning of the third quarter of 2003. Based onThis statement did not affect the financial instruments we currently use, and therefore the adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not impact our financial statements.

In December 2004, SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” was issued. This standard requires employee stock options other stock-based compensation awards to be accounted for under the fair value method, and eliminates the ability to account for these instruments under the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, and allowed under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123(R); is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We are evaluating the transition methods available under this standard but do not expect its impact to be material to our results of operations or financial position.

4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In July 2003, we sold our Wisches, France subsidiary for approximately $2.0 million and the assumption of approximately $1.1 million of debt owed to us by our subsidiary. At closing, we received $1.7 million and the remaining amounts arewere to be paid in two annual installments, over two years beginningthe first of which was received in July 2004. This subsidiary is reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Prior to the sale, the underlying assets were recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Accordingly, loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2003, includes a charge of $0.5 million, after tax, to write-down the carrying value of the assets prior to the sale. Revenue included in determining results from

discontinued operations totaled $2.6 million and $3.5 million for 2003 and 2002, respectively. This operation was previously reported in the Engineered ProductsSpecialty Papers business unit.

5. NEENAH RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

North American Restructuring ProgramThe North American Restructuring Program, which was initiated in the second quarter of 2004, is designed to improve operating results by enhancing product and service offerings in Specialty Papers’ book publishing markets, growing revenue from uncoated specialty papers, reducing our workforce at our Spring Grove facility by approximately 20%, and implementing improved supply chain management processes. In conjunction with this initiative, we negotiated a new labor agreement that enables us to achieve targeted workforce reduction levels at our Spring Grove, PA facility. As part of the new labor agreement, we offered a voluntary early retirement benefits package to eligible employees. These special termination benefits resulted in a charge of $16.5 million in 2004, substantially all of which is for enhanced pension benefits, post-retirement medical benefits and other related employee severance costs. In addition, we recorded restructuring charges totaling $0.7 million, for severance and related pension and other post employment benefits (“OPEB”) associated with the elimination of certain non-represented positions. The following table sets forth activity in the North American Restructuring Program restructuring reserve.

     
  Year Ended 
  December 31, 
In thousands 2004 
 
Beginning balance $0 
Amounts accrued  17,187 
Payments made  (644)
To be paid:    
From pension plan assets  (11,255)
As OPEB benefits  (5,228)
    
Ending balance $60 
 

The ending balance set forth above represents the portion of the North American Restructuring Program charges that is expected to require near term cash payments from us and primarily consist of severance and benefits continuation. Amounts representing enhanced pension benefits will be paid from our pension plan assets and are recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of our prepaid pension assets. The amounts for OPEB benefits were recorded as “Other long-term liabilities” in the accompanying condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We will pay the OPEB benefits as they are incurred over the course of the affected employees’ benefit period, which could range up to 8 years.



-32-

GLATFELTER


Neenah RestructuringIn September 2003, we announced the decision to permanently shut down a paper making machine and the deinking process at our Neenah, WI facility. The machinesThis initiative, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 190 positions and processes to be abandoned had been primarily supporting our Printing & Converting Paper business unit. The Neenah restructuringthe modification of a long-term steam supply contract, was initiated to allow us to reallocate resources to more fully support opportunities in higher growth, more profitable specialty markets. These initiatives, expected to be completed by March 31, 2004, will result in the elimination of approximately 200 positions.The machines and processes abandoned had supported our Specialty Papers business unit. The results of operations infor 2003 include related pre-tax charges of $13.5 million, of which $6.5 million are reflected in the consolidated income statement as components of cost of products sold, and $7.0 million are reflected as “restructuring charges.”

The $6.5results of operations in 2004 include $3.2 million pre-tax charge relatesof Neenah related restructuring charges, of which $3.0 million represents a fee paid to accelerated depreciation and an adjustmentmodify a steam supply contract at the Neenah facility in connection with the restructuring initiative. The remaining amount represents adjustments to net realizable value for spare parts and supplies inventory related to equipment to be abandoned. The $7.0 million pre-tax restructuring charge relates to the curtailment of pension and other retirement benefits, severance and certainestimated benefit continuation costs associated with the termination of employees.costs.

The following table sets forth information with respect to Neenah restructuring charges:

           
 Year Ended Year Ended December 31 
In thousands
 December 31, 2003
 2004 2003 
Contract modification fee $3,000 $ 
Depreciation on abandoned equipment $5,974   5,974 
Severance and benefit continuation 1,874  188 1,874 
Pension and other retirement benefits 4,878   4,878 
Other 768   768 
 
 
     
Total $13,494  $3,188 $13,494 
 
 
 

Additional charges may be required in 2004 depending on the resolution of certain contractual matters.

6. RESTRUCTURING RESERVE

The following table summarizes activity in ourthe Neenah Restructuring reserve:

    
 Neenah        
 Restructuring
 Year Ended December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2004 2003 
Beginning balance $  $1,625 $ 
Amounts accrued 1,754  3,188 2,105 
Payments made (129)  (4,065)  (480)
 
 
     
Ending balance $1,625  $748 $1,625 
 
 
 

As of December 31, 2003,2004, the amounts accrued related to the Neenah restructuring represent only those charges that are expected to result in cash payments and primarily consist of severance payments, benefits continuation and

- 29 -
GLATFELTER


medical retirement benefits. The Neenah restructuring charge totaled $13.5$16.7 million, of which $6.5 million iswas non-cash related, and $5.4 million is to be paid out of pension plan assets.

         
  2002
  Restructuring
In thousands
 2003
 2002
Beginning balance $2,572  $ 
Amounts accrued  350   2,572 
Payments made  (2,628)   
   
 
   
 
 
Ending balance $294  $2,572 
   
 
   
 
 

The 2002 Restructuring charge related to the reduction of our corporate workforce by 76 positions, including 36 positions eliminated through attrition. The workforce reduction was substantially completed in the first quarter of 2003. Of the $4.2 million charge, $1.7 million related to enhanced pension benefits to be paid out of pension plan assets.

7.6. UNUSUAL ITEMS

Unusual items included charges (gains) of $11.5 million, $(2.0) million and $60.9 million in 2003 2002 and 2001, respectively.

2003Unusual items reflect an $11.5 million charge relating to our former Ecusta Division, which was sold in 2001. Under the Ecusta Division acquisition agreement, we are indemnified for certain liabilities that have been assumed by the buyers. We had previously accrued liabilities related to certain post-retirement benefits, workers compensation claims and vendor payables and established a corresponding receivable due from the buyers. We paid the portion of these liabilities that became due and sought reimbursement from the buyers, which, to date, they have refused. The 2003 charge includes $5.5 million to fully reserve such receivables and an additional $6.0 million related to contingent landfill closure costs at the Ecusta facility.

2002Unusual items in 2002 included a $1.5 million contingent liability related to environmental matters with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (“Pennsylvania DEP”). This charge was offset by a $3.5 million gain for the settlement of certain escrow claims, including interest and associated liabilities related to the 1998 acquisition of our Schoeller & Hoesch (“S&H”) subsidiary.

2001On August 9, 2001,7. GAIN ON DISPOSITIONS OF PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS

During 2004 and 2003, we completed sales of timberlands and, in 2004, the sale of the Ecusta Division, including plant and equipment, inventory, accounts receivable and essentially all other operating assets and certain other receivables related to our tobacco papers business. These assetscorporate aircraft. The following table summarizes these transactions.

             
Dollars in thousands Acres  Proceeds  Gain/(loss) 
     
2004
            
Timberlands  4,482  $56,586  $55,355 
Corporate Aircraft  n/a   2,861   2,554 
Other  n/a   724   600 
         
Total     $60,171  $58,509 
         
             
2003            
Timberlands  25,500  $37,850  $31,234 
Other  n/a   2,892   1,100 
         
Total     $40,742  $32,334 
 

All property sales completed in 2004 were sold for $22.7 million pluscash. As consideration for the assumption by the buyer of certain liabilities totaling $21.4 million related to the Ecusta Division’s business. The liabilities assumed by the buyer included accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities related to the operation of the Ecusta Division’s business.

A calculation of the unusual item related to the 2001 sale of the Ecusta Division is as follows:

         
  Year Ended
In thousands
 December 31, 2001
Asset impairment recognized     $(50,000)
Loss recognized upon sale        
Consideration received $44,166     
Book value of net assets sold  (61,467)    
   
 
     
   (17,301)    
Transaction and other costs  (6,095)    
Gain on retiree benefit plans  14,988     
   
 
     
Loss on disposition excluding impairment charge      (8,408)
       
 
 
Total loss on disposition     $(58,408)
       
 
 

We also recognized a $2.5 million pretax charge during the second quarter of 2001 related to the settlement of an environmental mattertimberlands sold in connection with the Spring Grove facility’s wastewater discharge permit.

8. GAIN ON SALE OF TIMBERLANDS

On March 21, 2003, we sold 25,500 acres of timberlands in Maryland (the “Maryland Timberlands”, withreceived a carrying amount of $6.0 million, to10-year note from a subsidiary of The Conservation Fund (the “Timberland Buyer”). As consideration for the Maryland Timberlands, we received a 10-year note from the Timberland Buyer in the principal amount of $37.9 million (the “Note”), which is included in “Other Assets”assets” in the consolidated balance sheet. The Note bears interest at 3.22% per annum with interest-only payments due in quarterly installments. After five years the interest rate on the Note will be adjusted to the then existing bank prime rate. The Note is secured by a letter of credit issued by a financial institution. Net of transaction fees, a $31.2 million pre-tax gain was recognized from this transaction.Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The Company pledged the Note as collateral under a $34.0 million promissory note payable to SunTrust Financial (the “Note Payable”). The Note Payable bears a fixed rate of interest at 3.82% for five years at which time the Company can elect to renew the obligation.



-33-

- 30 -
GLATFELTER


9.

8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the details of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS):

                      
In thousands, except per share
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 
   
Income from continuing operations $12,986 $37,637 $6,829  $56,102   $12,986 $37,637 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (325)  (42) 129 
Loss from discontinued operations     (325)  (42)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net income $12,661 $37,595 $6,958  $56,102   $12,661 $37,595 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in basic EPS 43,731 43,396 42,577  43,856   43,731 43,396 
Common shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive stock options, restricted stock awards and performance awards 29 395 269  167   29 395 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common share equivalents used in diluted EPS 43,760 43,791 42,846  44,023   43,760 43,791 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
   
Basic EPS
    
Income from continuing operations $0.30 $0.87 $0.16  $1.28   $0.30 $0.87 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (0.01)   
Loss from discontinued operations     (0.01)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net income $0.29 $0.87 $0.16  $1.28   $0.29 $0.87 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Diluted EPS
    
Income from continuing operations $0.30 $0.86 $0.16  $1.27   $0.30 $0.86 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (0.01)   
Loss from discontinued operations     (0.01)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net income $0.29 $0.86 $0.16  $1.27   $0.29 $0.86 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    

The following table sets forth the potential common shares outstanding for options to purchase shares of common stock and the respective weighted-average exercise prices that were outstanding but were not included in the computation of dilutivediluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2003,period indicated, because their effect would be anti-dilutive.

             
In thousands, except exercise price
 2003
 2002
 2001
Options to purchase shares of common stock  1,846   1,996   1,818 
Weighted-average exercise price $15.33  $16.09  $16.98 
              
In thousands 2004  2003 2002
    
Potential common shares  1,664    1,846   1,996 

9. GAIN ON INSURANCE RECOVERIES

During 2004, we reached successful resolution of certain claims under insurance policies related to the Fox River environmental matter. Insurance recoveries included in the results of operations for 2004 totaled $32.8 million and were received in cash prior to December 31, 2004.

10. INCOME TAXES

Income taxes are recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns. The effects of income taxes are measured based on effective tax law and rates.

The provision for income taxes from continuing operations consisted of the following:

                     
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 
   
Current taxes             
Federal $(723) $1,135 $(8,893) $8,982   $(723) $1,135 
State 27 18   5,262   27 18 
Foreign 347 2,426 32  3,053   347 2,426 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
  (349) 3,579  (8,861) 17,297    (349) 3,579 
Deferred taxes          
Federal 1,562 12,653 7,777  14,292   1,562 12,653 
State 2,950 167 1,604  101   2,950 167 
Foreign 3,267 5,093 4,173  2,971   3,267 5,093 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 7,779 17,913 13,554  17,364   7,779 17,913 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Total provision for income taxes from continuing operations $7,430 $21,492 $4,693  $34,661   $7,430 $21,492 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    

The following are domestic and foreign components of pretax income from continuing operations:

                      
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 
United States $16,968 $38,742 $(525) $78,627   $16,968 $38,742 
Foreign 3,448 20,387 12,047  12,136   3,448 20,387 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
Total pretax income $20,416 $59,129 $11,522  $90,763   $20,416 $59,129 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    

A reconciliation between the income tax provision, computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes from continuing operations, and the actual income tax:

                      
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 
   
Federal income tax provision at statutory rate $7,146 $20,695 $4,033  $31,767   $7,146 $20,695 
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 1,935 120 1,043  3,486   1,935 120 
Tax effect of bargain sale  (3,991)        (3,991)  
Tax effect of tax credits  (1,493)  (300)  (100)  (3,690)   (1,493)  (300)
Valuation allowance 5,027    3,078   5,027  
Resolution of tax matters  (1,723)   
Tax effect of exempt earnings of foreign sales corporation    (33)
Resolution/(provision) of tax matters 263    (1,723)  
       
Other 529 977  (250)  (243)  529 977 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Income tax provision $7,430 $21,492 $4,693 
Total provision for income taxes from continuing operations $34,661   $7,430 $21,492 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    



- 31 -
-34-

GLATFELTER


As of December 31, 2003, theThe sources of deferred income taxes were as follows:

              
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 
   
Deferred tax assets:    
Reserves $19,362 $14,145  $16,397   $19,362 
Compensation 4,952 6,648  3,344   4,952 
Post-retirement benefits 10,448 11,008  12,583   10,448 
Property 168 606  182   168 
Pension 765 757  890   765 
Inventories 427 505  368   427 
Tax carryforwards 27,917 8,364  24,339   27,917 
Other 11,256 9,352  3,023   11,256 
 
 
 
 
     
Subtotal 75,295 51,385  61,126   75,295 
Valuation allowance  (15,777)  (8,438)  (20,037)   (15,777)
 
 
 
 
     
Total deferred tax assets 59,518 42,947  41,089   59,518 
Deferred tax liabilities:    
Property 127,262 124,439  124,833   127,262 
Pension 92,009 82,022  95,741   92,009 
Installment sale 12,679   12,521   12,679 
Other 6,324 4,951  5,535   6,324 
 
 
 
 
     
Total deferred tax liabilities 238,274 211,412  238,630   238,274 
 
 
 
 
     
Net deferred tax liabilities $178,756 $168,465  $197,541   $178,756 
 
 
 
 
 

At December 31, 2003,2004, the Company had federal, state and foreign tax net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $28.7 million, $64.6$60.8 million and $17.9$11.7 million, respectively. These NOL carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income, if any. The federal NOL carryforward expires in 2023; state NOL carryforwards expire between 20042005 and 2018;2024; and the foreign NOL carryforwards do not expire.

In addition, the Company had federal charitable contribution carryforwards totaling $14.2of $11.1 million, that expire between 2006 andwhich expires in 2008, and federal researchforeign tax credit carryforwards of $0.5$0.9 million, which expire in 2022between 2013 and 2023.2014, and various state tax credit carryforwards totaling $5.0 million, which expire between 2005 and 2019.

The Company has established a valuation allowance of $15.8$20.0 million against the net deferred tax assets, primarily due to the uncertainty regarding the ability to utilize state NOL andtax carryforwards, a federal charitable contribution carryforwards,carryforward, and certain deferred foreign tax credits, the realization of which has been impacted by recent changes in German tax legislation.credits.

At December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, unremitted earnings of subsidiaries outside the United States deemed to be permanently reinvested totaled $55.9 million and $42.5 million, and $37.0 million, respectively. NoBecause the unremitted earnings of subsidiaries are deemed to be permanently reinvested as of December 31, 2004, no deferred tax liability has been recognized with regardin the Company’s financial statements.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”) was signed into law on October 22, 2004. The Act creates a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate accumulated income abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. As of December 31, 2004, management has not decided whether, and to what extent, the remittanceCompany would repatriate foreign earnings under the Act. Neither the amount of repatriation nor the related income tax effect from such earnings. Itrepatriation can be reasonably estimated at this time. The income tax effect is not practicabledependent upon a number of factors, which are being analyzed, including, among others, the cost of financing, the cash requirements of foreign entities and the issuance of additional guidance from the U.S. Treasury Department. The Company will continue to estimateanalyze the effect of this provision and expects to complete this analysis before the end of 2005, and will recognize the income tax liability that might be incurredeffect, if such earnings were remittedany, in the period when a decision whether to the United States.repatriate is made.



The net deferred taxes reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows:

                                      
 2003
 2002 2004 2003 
In thousands
 Federal
 State
 Foreign
 Total
 Total
 Federal State Foreign Total Total 
   
Current asset $19,459 $1,429 $1,207 $22,095 $6,984  $7,880 $322 $708 $8,910   $22,095 
Current liability   1,071 1,071 975  1,010 1,010   1,071 
Long-term asset   8,054 8,054 9,284  6,633 6,633   8,054 
Long-term liability 157,565 28,079 22,190 207,834 183,758  159,143 28,234 24,697 212,074   207,834 
  

The components of the net deferred tax balances as of December 31 are as follows:

                                    
 2003
 2002 2004 2003 
In thousands
 Federal
 State
 Foreign
 Total
 Total
 Federal State Foreign Total Total 
Deferred tax assets:    
Current $19,459 $1,429 $1,207 $22,095 $6,984  $7,880 $322 $708 $8,910   $22,095 
Long-term 24,574 4,795 8,054 37,423 35,963  21,395 4,151 6,633 32,179   37,423 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 $44,033 $6,224 $9,261 $59,518 $42,947  $29,275 $4,473 $7,341 $41,089   $59,518 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
           
Deferred tax liabilities:    
Current $ $ $1,071 $1,071 $975    $1,010 $1,010   $1,071 
Long-term 182,139 32,874 22,190 237,203 210,437  180,538 32,385 24,697 237,620   237,203 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
           
 $182,139 $32,874 $23,261 $238,274 $211,412  $180,538 $32,385 $25,707 $238,630   $238,274 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
           

- 32 -
-35-

GLATFELTER


11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

On April 23, 1997, the common shareholders amended the 1992 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan (“1992 Plan”) to authorize, among other things, the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of Glatfelter common stock to eligible participants. The 1992 Plan provides for restricted stock awards, non-qualified stock options, performance shares, incentive stock options and performance units. To date, there have been no grants of incentive stock options or performance units.

Restricted Stock UnitsDuring 2004, 157,280 nonvested RSUs, net of forfeitures, were awarded, under the 1992 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan, to executive officers and other key employees. Under terms of the awards, the RSUs vest based solely on the passage of time on a graded scale over a three, four, and five year period. On the grant date, the RSUs, net of forfeitures were valued at $1.7 million and were recorded as “Deferred compensation,” a contra-equity account in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Stock-based compensation expense with respect to the RSUs totaled $0.5 million during the 2004.

Restricted Stock Performance AwardsThe following table summarizes shares of restricted common stock awarded under the 1992 Plan for each of the past three years:Plan:

      
For the year ended December 31:
 Restricted Stock Awards
 Awards
2003 2,660   2,660 
2002 29,926   29,926 
2001 64,430 

Awards issued in 2003 and 2002 vest ratably over a three-year period and the 2001 awards vest over a four-year period. Awarded shares are subject to forfeiture, in whole or in part, if the recipient ceases to be an employee within a specified time period. Awards made in 2003 and 2002 are also subject to forfeiture if targeted earnings per share or shareholder returns measures are not met. Shares awarded in 2001 are subject to forfeiture if defined minimum earnings levels are not met.

The number of shares otherwise required to be delivered may be reduced by an amount that would have a fair market value equal to the taxes we withhold on delivery. We may also, at our discretion, elect to pay to the recipients in cash an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares that would otherwise be delivered. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense with respect to restricted stock performance awards for each of the past three years:

        
In thousands
 Compensation Expense
 Compensation Expense 
2004
 $(443)
2003
 $533  533 
2002 362  362 
2001 856 

Performance SharesGrants of Performance Shares under the 1992 Plan of 44,060, 40,060 and 45,740 shares were made during each of the three years ended 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. We recognized a reduction of expense of $0.1 million in 2001 related to these awards.



Non-Qualified Stock OptionsThe following table summarizes the activity with respect to non-qualified options to purchase shares of common stock granted under the 1992 Plan:

                      
                       2004 2003 2002 
 2003 2002 2001 Weighted- Weighted- Weighted- 
 Weighted- Weighted- Weighted- Average Average Average 
 Average Average Average Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price 
 Shares
 Exercise Price
 Shares
 Exercise Price
 Shares
 Exercise Price
   
Outstanding at beginning of year 2,828,529 $15.00 3,736,182 $14.79 3,650,682 $14.49  2,304,339 $14.71   2,828,529 $15.00 3,736,182 $14.79 
Granted 40,990 11.75 309,450 13.98 569,100 15.45  51,250 11.18   40,990 11.75 309,450 13.98 
Exercised  (43,287) 12.60  (790,800) 13.26  (237,771) 12.40   (72,850) 12.61    (43,287) 12.60  (790,800) 13.26 
Canceled  (521,893) 16.47  (426,303) 15.60  (245,829) 14.26   (184,127) 15.51    (521,893) 16.47  (426,303) 15.60 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          
Outstanding at end of year 2,304,339 14.71 2,828,529 15.00 3,736,182 14.79  2,098,612 14.65   2,304,339 14.71 2,828,529 15.00 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          
   
Exercisable at end of year 1,410,614 $15.45 1,436,681 $15.94 1,982,233 $15.72  1,956,439 $15.17   1,410,614 $15.45 1,436,681 $15.94 

-36-

GLATFELTER


The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003:2004:

                         
      Options Outstanding
 Option Exercisable
          Weighted-        
          Average Weighted-     Weighted-
          Remaining Average Number Average
      Shares
 Contractual Life
 Exercise Price
 Outstanding
 Exercise Price
$10.78 to $12.41     458,835   5.3  $12.24   426,095  $12.30 
 12.95 to   14.44     791,772   7.3   13.28   331,487   13.14 
 15.44 to   17.16     556,075   6.1   15.73   162,875   16.36 
 17.54 to   18.78     497,657   3.4   18.13   490,157   18.14 
       
 
           
 
     
       2,304,339   5.8   14.71   1,410,614   15.00 
       
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
                         
  Options Outstanding      Option Exercisable 
      Weighted-               
      Average  Weighted-          Weighted- 
      Remaining  Average      Number  Average 
  Shares  Contractual Life  Exercise Price      Outstanding  Exercise Price 
 
$10.78 to $12.41  434,810   4.9  $12.11       373,237  $12.25 
12.95 to 14.44  732,097   6.4   13.28       651,497   13.32 
15.44 to 17.16  471,275   5.9   15.74       471,275   15.74 
17.54 to 18.78  460,430   2.4   18.13       460,430   18.13 
                       
   2,098,612   5.1           1,956,439     
 

- 33 -
GLATFELTER


An additional 674,110112,720 options became exercisable January 1, 20042005 at a weighted-average exercise price of $14.45.$12.42.

Options granted prior to 2002 become exercisable for 25% of the grant amount, beginning January 1 of the year following the date of grant, assuming six months has passed. An additional 25% become exercisable on January 1 of each of the next three years. Options not exercisable in this format are exercisable in full either six months or one year from the date of grant. Stock options granted in 2002 were toafter December 31, 2001 vest ratably over three years beginning January 1 of the year following the date of grant. In December 2003, the Compensation Committee accelerated the vesting of options granted during December 2001 and December 2002, to become fully vested as of January 1, 2004. Vesting was accelerated for an aggregate of 639,610 shares, of which 98,300 were previously vested under their original terms. Since the options’ exercise price was belowgreater than the market value of the underlying common stock at the time vesting was accelerated, no compensation expense was recognized. All options expire on the earlier of termination or, in some instances, a defined period subsequent to termination of employment, or ten years from the date of grant.

The exercise price represents the average quoted market price of Glatfelter common stock on the date of grant, or the average quoted market prices of Glatfelter common stock on the first day before and after the date of grant for which quoted market price information was available if such information was not available on the date of grant.

The 1992 plan, as amended, expires in 2007. As of December 31, 2003, 1,230,2182004, 1,205,815 shares of common stock were available for future issuance under the 1992 Plan.

12. RETIREMENT PLANS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

We have both funded and, with respect to our international operations, unfunded noncontributory defined-benefit pension plans covering substantially all of

our employees. The benefits are based, in the case of certain plans, on average salary and years of service and, in the case of other plans, on a fixed amount for each year of service. Plan provisions and funding meet the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Company usesWe use a December 31-measurement date for all of itsour defined benefit plans.

We also provide certain health care benefits to eligible retired employees. These benefits include a comprehensive medical plan for retirees prior to age 65 and fixed supplemental premium payments to retirees over age 65 to help defray the costs of Medicare. The plan is not funded and claims are paid as reported.

                            
 Pension Benefits
 Other Benefits
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits 
In millions
 2003
 2002
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 2004 2003 
      
Change in Benefit Obligation
      
Balance at beginning of year $249.8 $223.8 $49.4 $33.3  $267.2   $249.8 $39.7   $49.4 
Service Cost 3.7 4.3 1.0 1.4  3.9   3.7 1.0   1.0 
Interest Cost 16.3 15.5 2.5 3.2  16.1   16.3 2.4   2.5 
Plan amendments 4.7 16.2  (4.6)  (4.3) 0.2   4.7    (4.6)
Actuarial loss 10.0 4.6  (4.3) 20.0  15.9   10.0 2.0    (4.3)
Benefits paid  (17.0)  (16.3)  (4.0)  (4.2)  (18.4)   (17.0)  (3.6)   (4.0)
Impact of curtailments  (0.3)   (0.3)    (0.5)   (0.3) 5.1    (0.3)
Unusual items  1.7   
Impact of special termination benefits 10.8    0.1    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
Balance at end of year $267.2 $249.8 $39.7 $49.4  $295.2   $267.2 46.7   $39.7 
        
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Change in Plan Assets
      
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $385.9 $458.6 $ $  $445.7   $385.9 $   $ 
Actual return on plan assets 74.5  (58.8)    35.8   74.5     
Employer contributions 2.3 2.4 4.0 4.2  2.5   2.3 3.6   4.0 
Benefits paid  (17.0)  (16.3)  (4.0)  (4.2)  (18.4)   (17.0)  (3.6)   (4.0)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $445.7 $385.9    $465.6   $445.7 $   $ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
     
Reconciliation of Funded Status
      
Funded Status $178.5 $136.2 $(39.7) $(49.4) $170.4   $178.5 $(46.7)  $(39.7)
Unrecognized transition assets  (0.9)  (2.1)        (0.9)     
Unrecognized prior service cost 24.3 26.8  (7.6)  (4.7) 21.7   24.3  (6.8)   (7.6)
Unrecognized (gain) loss 15.2 43.2 20.4 26.0  33.4   15.2 21.1   20.4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
Net amount recognized $217.1 $204.1 $(26.9) $(28.1) $225.5   $217.1 $(32.4)  $(26.9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         



-37-

GLATFELTER


The net prepaid pension cost for qualified pension plans is primarily included in “Other assets,” and the accrued pension cost for non-qualified pension plans and accrued post-retirement benefit costs are primarily included in “Other long-term liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20032004 and 2002.2003.

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of the following as of December 31:

                            
 Pension Benefits
 Other Benefits
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits 
In millions
 2003
 2002
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 2004 2003 
      
Prepaid benefit cost $236.3 $221.6 $ $  $245.4   $236.3 $   $ 
Accrued benefit liability  (19.2)  (17.6)  (26.9)  (28.1)  (19.9)   (19.2)  (32.4)   (26.9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
Net amount recognized $217.1 $204.0 $(26.9) $(28.1) $225.5   $217.1 $(32.4)  $(26.9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $254.9$283.2 million and $234.3$262.2 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and 2002, respectively.

- 34 -
GLATFELTER


The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the benefit obligations above were as follows:

                 
  Pension Benefits
 Other Benefits
  2003
 2002
 2003
 2002
Discount rate – benefit obligation  6.25%  6.75%  6.25%  6.75%
Future compensation growth rate  4.0   4.5       
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets  8.5   8.5       
                   
  Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
  2004   2003  2004   2003 
       
Discount rate - benefit obligation  5.75%   6.25%  5.75%   6.25%
Future compensation growth rate  4.0    4.0        
         

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets was as follows:

              
In millions
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 
   
Projected benefit obligation $29.8 $25.7  $23.1   $29.8 
Accumulated benefit obligation 27.1 23.1  21.8   27.1 
Fair value of plan assets        

Net periodic benefit (income) cost includes the following components:

                      
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In millions
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 
   
Pension Benefits
    
Service cost $3.7 $4.3 $4.6  $3.9   $3.7 $4.3 
Interest cost 16.3 15.5 16.1  16.1   16.3 15.5 
Expected return on plan assets  (38.7)  (46.7)  (45.8)  (39.4)   (38.7)  (46.7)
Amortization of transition asset  (1.3)  (1.9)  (1.7)  (0.8)   (1.3)  (1.9)
Amortization of prior service cost 2.8 1.4 1.5  2.4   2.8 1.4 
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss 0.0  (5.3)  (5.4) 0.4   0.0  (5.3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Net periodic benefit (income) cost  (17.2)  (32.7)  (30.7)  (17.4)   (17.2)  (32.7)
Special termination benefits 5.4 1.7      5.4 1.7 
Curtailment and settlement    (14.0) 11.4     
     
Total net periodic benefit (income) cost $(11.8) $(31.0) $(44.7) $(6.0)  $(11.8) $(31.0)
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
Other Benefits
    
Service cost $1.0 $1.4 $0.9  $1.0   $1.0 $1.4 
Interest cost 2.5 3.2 2.3  2.4   2.5 3.2 
Expected return on plan assets          
Amortization of transition asset          
Amortization of prior service cost  (0.8)  (0.4)  (0.2)  (0.7)   (0.8)  (0.4)
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss 1.1 1.4 0.4  1.2   1.1 1.4 
     
Net periodic benefit (income) cost 3.8 5.6 3.4  3.9   3.8 5.6 
Special termination benefits  (0.5)    5.2    (0.5)  
Plan amendments  (0.7)        (0.7)  
Curtailment and settlement    (0.9)      
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Total net periodic benefit cost $2.6 $5.6 $2.5  $9.1   $2.6 $5.6 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    

The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the net periodic benefit (income) cost information above were as follows:

                    
 Year Ended December 31
 Year Ended December 31 
In millions
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 
   
Pension Benefits
    
Discount rate – benefit expense  6.75%  7.0%  7.0%  6.25%   6.75%  7.0%
Future compensation growth rate 4.0 3.5 3.5  4.0   4.0 3.5 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets 8.5 9.0 9.0  8.5   8.5 9.0 
   
Other Benefits
    
Discount rate – benefit expense  6.75%  7.0%  7.0%  6.25%   6.75%  7.0%
Future compensation growth rate          
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets          
  

To develop the expected long-term rate of return assumption, the Companywe considered the historical returns and the future expected returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio. This resulted in the selection of the 8.5% long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for 2003.2004.



-38-

GLATFELTER


Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31 were as follows

      
       2004 2003 
 2003
 2002
   
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year  13.0%  12.0%  11.5%   13.0%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) 5.0 5.0  5.0   5.0 
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate rate 2013 2016  2014   2013 
  

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A one percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

                
 One percentage point
 One percentage point 
In thousands
 increase
 decrease
 increase decrease 
Effect on:  
Post-retirement benefit obligation $3,417 $(3,017) $3,744 $(3,303)
Total of service and interest cost components 361  (312) 376  (325)

- 35 -
GLATFELTER


Plan Assets

Glatfelter’s pension plan weighted-average allocations at December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, by asset category, are as follows:

      
      2004 2003 
 2003
 2002
   
Asset Category    
Equity securities  74%  79%  66%   74%
Debt securities 18 18  30   18 
Cash and real estate 8 3  4   8 
 
 
 
 
      
Total  100%  100%  100%   100%
 
 
 
 
    

Our objective is to achieve an above-market rate of return on our pension plan assets. Based upon this objective, along with the timing of benefit payments and the risks associated with various asset classes available for investment, we have established the following asset allocation guidelines:

      
             Minimum Target Maximum
 Minimum
 Target
 Maximum
  
Equity  60%  70%  80% 60% 70% 80%
Fixed Income & Other  20%  30%  40% 20% 30% 40%

Real estate can be between 0% and 5% of the target equity allocation. Glatfelter stock can also be between 0% and 5% of the target equity allocation, although there were no holdings of Glatfelter stock as of December 31, 20032004 or 2002.2003. Our investment policy prohibits the investment in certain securities without the approval of the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors. Regarding Fixed Income securities, the weighted-average credit quality will be at least “AA” with a “BBB” minimum credit quality for each issue.

Cash FlowThe Company doesWe do not expect to make contributions to itsour qualified pension plans in 2004.2005. Contributions and benefit payments expected to be made in 20042005 under its our

non-qualified pension plans and other benefit plans are summarized below:

        
In millions
 
In thousands 
Nonqualified pension plans $2.4  $1,680 
Other benefit plans 4.3  4,983 

Defined Contribution PlansWe maintain 401(k) plans for certain hourly and salaried employees. Employees may contribute up to 15% of their salary to these plans, subject to certain restrictions. We will match a portion of the employee’s contribution, subject to certain limitations, in the form of shares of Glatfelter common stock. The expense associated with our 401(k) match was $0.7 million, $0.7 million and $1.2 million in 2004, 2003 and $1.4 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

13. INVENTORIES

Inventories, net of reserves were as follows:

              
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 
   
Raw materials $15,105 $14,385  $14,974   $15,106 
In-process and finished 32,145 31,959  39,327   32,145 
Supplies 24,318 23,546  24,535   24,318 
 
 
 
 
      
Total $71,569 $69,890  $78,836   $71,569 
 
 
 
 
    

If we had valued all inventories using the average-cost method, inventories would have been $14.412.6 million and $9.3$14.4 million higher than reported at December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, respectively. During 2003 and 2001 we liquidated certain LIFO inventories. Theinventories, the effect of the liquidationswhich did not have a significant impact on net income.

At December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, the recorded value of the above inventories werewas approximately $1.3$0.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, lower than inventories for income tax purposes.

14. PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS

Plant, equipment and timberlands at December 31 were as follows:

              
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 
   
Land and buildings $129,130 $123,749  $137,668   $129,130 
Machinery and equipment 880,897 811,982  902,835   880,897 
Other 86,306 87,807  85,891   86,306 
Accumulated depreciation  (560,291)  (522,345)  (611,852)   (560,291)
 
 
 
 
      
 536,042 501,193  514,542   536,042 
Construction in progress 4,454 12,228  3,219   4,454 
Timberlands, less depletion 2,464 3,632  2,651   2,464 
 
 
 
 
      
Plant, equipment and timberlands – net $542,960 $517,053  $520,412   $542,960 
 
 
 
 
    

15. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

We adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002 and discontinued the amortization of goodwill. Excluding goodwill amortization expense, adjusted net income in 2001 was $7.2 million, or $0.17 per diluted share.- 39 -

16. GLATFELTER


15.OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other current liabilities is summarized as follows:

              
 December 31
 December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 
   
Accrued payroll and benefits $13,791 $16,176  $19,525   $13,791 
Other accrued compensation and retirement benefits 6,929 6,532  8,838   6,929 
Income taxes payable 15,317   1,565 
Other accrued expenses 23,530 24,139  14,534   21,965 
 
 
 
 
      
Total $44,250 $46,847  $58,214   $44,250 
 
 
 
 
    

- 36 -
GLATFELTER


17.16. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt is summarized as follows:

             
 December 31
 December 31 
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2004 2003 
   
Revolving credit facility, due June 2006 $64,047 $67,681  $23,277   $64,047 
67/8% Notes, due July 2007
 150,000 150,000 
6 7/8% Notes, due July 2007 150,000   150,000 
Note payable – SunTrust, due March 2008 34,000   34,000   34,000 
Other notes, various 1,228 1,823  446   1,228 
 
 
 
 
      
Total long-term debt 249,275 219,504  207,723   249,275 
Less current portion  (806)  (795)  (446)   (806)
 
 
 
 
      
Long-term debt, excluding current portion $248,469 $218,709  $207,277   $248,469 
 
 
 
 
    

On June 24, 2002, we entered into an unsecured $102.5 million multi-currency revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) with a syndicate of three major banks. An additional $22.5 million was added to the Facility on September 24, 2002 with a fourth major bank. The Facility, which replaced an old facility, enables Glatfelter or its subsidiaries to borrow up to the equivalent of $125.0 million in certain currencies. Borrowings can be made for any time period from one day to six months and incur interest based on the domestic prime rate or a Eurocurrency rate, at our option, plus a margin ranging from .525 to 1.05. The margin and a facility fee on the commitment balance are based on the higher of our debt ratings as published by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. The Facility requires us to meet certain leverage and interest coverage ratios, with both of which we are in compliance with at December 31, 2003.2004.

On July 22, 1997, we issued $150.0 million principal amount of 67/8%8% Notes due July 15, 2007. Interest on the Notes is payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15. The Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at our option at any time at a calculated redemption price plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption, and constitute unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The net proceeds from the sale of the Notes were used primarily to repay certain short-term unsecured debt and related interest.

On March 21, 2003, we sold approximately 25,500 acres of timberlands and received as consideration a $37.9 million 10-year interest bearing note receivable from the Timberland Buyer. We pledged the Note as collateral under a $34.0 million promissory note payable to SunTrust Financial (the “Note Payable”). The Note Payable bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.82% for five years at which time we can elect to renew the obligation.

P. H. Glatfelter Company guarantees debt obligations of all its subsidiaries. All such obligations are recorded in these consolidated financial statements.

At December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, we had $4.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of letters of credit issued to us by a financial institution. The letters of credit are for the benefit of certain state workers compensation insurance agencies in conjunction with our self-insurance program. No amounts were outstanding under the letters of credit. We bear the credit risk on this amount to the extent that we do not comply with the provisions of certain agreements. The letters of credit do not reduce the amount available under our lines of credit.

18. FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES17. CROSS-CURRENCY SWAP

In conjunction with our 2002 refinancing, we entered into a cross-currency swap transaction effective June 24, 2002. Under this transaction, we swapped $70.0 million for approximately €73.073.0 million and will pay interest on the Euro portion of the swap at a floating Eurocurrency Rate, plus applicable margins and will receive interest on the dollar portion of the swap at a floating U.S. Dollar LIBOR, plus applicable margins. The contract matures on June 24, 2006. The cross-currency swap is designed to provide protection from the impact that changes in currency rates have on certain U.S. dollar-denominated inter-company obligations recorded at our subsidiary in Gernsbach, Germany. The cross currencycross-currency swap is recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value of $(22.0)$(29.6) and $(6.5)$(22.0) million at December 31, 20032004 and 2002,2003, respectively, under the caption “Other long-term liabilities”.liabilities.” Changes in fair value are recognized in current earnings as “Other income (expenses)” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The mark-to-market adjustment was offset by a gain on the related remeasurement of the USU.S. dollar denominated inter-company obligations.

The credit risks associated with our financial derivatives are controlled through the evaluation and monitoring of creditworthiness of the counterparties. Although counterparties may expose us to losses in the event of nonperformance, we do not expect such losses, if any, to be significant.



- 3740 -

GLATFELTER


18. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The following table summarizes outstanding shares of common stock:

              
  Year Ended December 31, 
In thousands 2004   2003  2002 
    
Shares outstanding at beginning of year  43,782    43,644   42,750 
Treasury shares issued for:             
Restricted stock performance awards  19    8   5 
401(k) plan  69    80   92 
Director compensation  7    7   6 
Employee stock options exercised  73    43   791 
      
Shares outstanding at end of year  43,950    43,782   43,644 
    

19. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Contractual Commitments

At December 31, 2003, requiredThe following table summarizes the minimum annual rentals due on noncancelable operating leases and other similar contractual obligations having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year aggregated $18.2 million. Minimumyear. Other contractual obligations primarily represent minimum purchase commitments under steam, energy and pulpwood supply contracts.

         
In thousands Leases  Other 
 
2005  2,289   21,086 
2006  1,166   19,726 
2007  1,059   7,872 
2008  733   7,722 
2009  695   7,700 
 

At December 31, 2004, required minimum annual rentals for each of the years 2004 through 2008 are $3.7 million, $1.7 million, $1.3 million, $0.7due under operating leases and other similar contractual obligation aggregated $15.4 million and $0.6$121.9 million, respectively.

Ecusta Division Matters

In August 2001, pursuant to an acquisition agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”), we sold the assets of our Ecusta Division to four related entities, consisting of Purico (IOM) Limited, an Isle of Man limited liability company (“Purico”), and RF&Son Inc. (“RF”), RFS US Inc. (“RFS US”) and RFS Ecusta Inc. (“RFS Ecusta”), each of which is a Delaware corporation, (collectively, the “Buyers”). As part of the Acquisition Agreement, the Buyers assumed certain liabilities related to the operation of the Ecusta Division. In July 2002, we received notice from the Buyers’ legal counsel asserting claims for indemnification for certain alleged damages incurred by the Buyers, pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement. During October 2003, the Buyers informed us that the total value of these claims was approximately $3.5 million. We believe that these claims are without merit and intend to vigorously defend our position.

In August 2002, the Buyers shut down the manufacturing operation of the pulp and paper mill in Pisgah Forest, North Carolina, which was the most significant operation of the Ecusta Division. On October 23, 2002, RFS Ecusta and RFS US filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. During the fourth quarter of 2002, in accordance with the provisions of the Acquisition Agreement, we notified the Buyers of third party claims (“Third Party Claims”) made against us for which we are seeking indemnification from the Buyers. The Third Party Claims primarily relate to certain post-retirement benefits, workers compensation claims and vendor payables.

Effective August 8, 2003, the assets of RFS Ecusta and RFS US, which substantially consist of the pulp and paper mill and related real property, were sold to anseveral third

parties unrelated third partyto the Buyers (the “New Buyer”Buyers”), whose. We understand the New Buyers’ business plan iswas to continue certain mill-related operations and to convert portions of the mill site into a business park.

Beginning in April 2003, governmental authorities, including the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (“NCDENR”), initiated discussions with us and the New BuyerBuyers regarding, among other environmental issues, certain potential landfill closure liabilities (“Landfill Closure Costs”) associated with the Ecusta mill and its properties. The discussions focused on NCDENR’s desire to establish a plan and secure financial resources to close three landfills located at the Ecusta facility and to address other environmental matters at the facility. During the third quarter of 2003, the discussions ended with NCDENR’s conclusion to hold us responsible for the closure of the landfills. In March 2004, the NCDENR issued us an order requiring the closure of one of the three landfills at issue. We intend to pursue reimbursement for any such claimsLandfill Closure Costs from the Buyers under the indemnification provisions of the Acquisition Agreement.

Based on our analysis of currently available information and our landfill closure experience, we estimateestimated the Landfill Closure Costs willwould total approximately $7.6 million. During 2003, we established a reserve in this amount through charges to our results of operations. In November 2004, in compliance with the March 2004 NCDENR order, we completed the physical closure of the subject landfill. As of December 31, 2004, our reserve for Landfill Closure Costs declined to $6.4 million, of which $1.6 million was accrued in the second quarter of 2003 and $6.0 million was accrued in the third quarter of 2003. The second quarter 2003 accrual relatedreflecting costs paid to a specific landfill and was recordeddate. We believe this reserve to be adequate based on our conclusion it was probable that we would incur the closure costs because the landfill was already in the processassessment of being closed and was of no potential value to the New Buyer. In the second quarter of 2003, we established an offsetting receivable due from the Buyers for landfill closure costs of $1.6 million pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement indemnification provisions. We believe theremaining Landfill Closure Costs are liabilities for which the Buyers are obligated to indemnify us.be incurred.

In addition to Landfill Closure Costs, prior to 2003 we had recorded liabilities for Third Party Claims, totaling $3.3 million. Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, we believe the Buyers assumed all of these liabilities and they agreed to indemnify and hold us harmless. Accordingly, we had previously recorded a receivable for amounts due from Purico and RF, the Buyers that have not filed for bankruptcy. However, in September 2003, the Buyers failed to respond to our demand to reimburse us for the portion of the liabilities that we had paid. Therefore, in the third quarter of 2003, we fully reserved for the amounts recordedprimarily related to the receivables due from Purico and RF.workers compensation claims, for approximately $2.2 million.

In the third quarter of 2003, we terminated postretirement medical benefits previously provided to certain former employees of Ecusta. Pursuant to a separate agreement, we continued to provide these benefits and were to be reimbursed by the Buyers. In connection with the termination of such benefits, we reduced recorded Third Party Claims by approximately $1.0 million. The corresponding offsetting receivable was reduced as well, but only to the extent we had not previously expended cash for such postretirement benefits.

- 38 -
GLATFELTER


The charge included in our results of operations for 2003 totaled $11.5 million and was to fully reserve for amounts due from the Buyers. We continue to believe the Buyers are responsible for the Landfill Closure Costs and the Third Party Claims under provisions of the Acquisition Agreement, and believe we have a strong legal basis to seek indemnification. We intend to pursue appropriate avenues to enforce the provisions of the Acquisition Agreement.

In October 2004, the bankruptcy trustee for the estates of RFS Ecusta and RFS US filed a complaint in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina against certain of the Buyers and other related parties (“Defendant Buyers”) and us. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Defendant Buyers engaged in fraud and fraudulent transfers and breached their fiduciary duties. With respect to Glatfelter, the



- 41 -

GLATFELTER


complaint alleges that we aided and abetted the Defendant Buyers in their purported actions in the Defendant Buyers’ structuring of the acquisition of the Ecusta Division and asserts a claim against us under the Bankruptcy Code. The trustee seeks damages from us in an amount not less than $25.8 million, plus interest, and other relief. We believe these claims are largely without merit and we are vigorously defending ourselves in this action. Accordingly, no amounts have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The bankruptcy trustee filed another complaint, also in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina, against us, certain banks and other parties, seeking, among other things, damages totaling $6.5 million for alleged breaches of the Acquisition Agreement (the “Breach Claims”), release of certain amounts held in escrow totaling $3.5 million (the “Escrow Claims”) and recoveries of unspecified amounts allegedly payable under the Acquisition Agreement and a related agreement. As we previously disclosed, we were first notified of the potential Breach Claims in July 2002, which are primarily related to the physical condition of the Ecusta mill at the time of sale. We believe these claims are without merit. With respect to the Escrow Claims, the trustee seeks the release of certain amounts held in escrow related to the sale of the Ecusta Division, of which $2.0 million was escrowed at the time of closing in the event of claims arising such as those asserted in the Breach Claim. The Escrow Claims also include amounts alleged to total $1.5 million arising from sales by us of certain properties at or around the Ecusta mill. We have previously reserved such escrowed amounts and they are recorded in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Other long-term liabilities.” We are vigorously defending ourselves in this action.

Further, governmental authorities are continuing to investigatemonitor the environmental conditions at the Ecusta mill. We are uncertain as to what additional Ecusta-related claims, including environmental matters, if any, may be asserted against us. The aboveIn September 2004, one of the New Buyers entered into a Brownfield Agreement with the NCDENR relating to the Ecusta mill. We believe that the New Buyers continue to have discussions with the governmental authorities concerning certain other environmental related matters at the former Ecusta facility resulted in the New Buyer agreeing to be held responsible for the resolution thereof. Based on information currently available, we estimate the cost of resolution of these issues could range from $0 to $0.5 million in addition to amounts accrued.facility. The likelihood and extent of potential claims against us could be mitigated by the successful execution of the New Buyer’sBuyers’ business plan. Should any claims be made against us, we would seek indemnification for such damages to the extent possible in accordance with the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. We cannot ascertain at this time what additional impact, if any, these matters will have on our consolidated financial position and/or results of operations, and no amounts with respect thereto have been recorded.

In addition to the amounts discussed above, as of December 31, 2003, our trade accounts receivable included $0.6 million for products sold by our S&H subsidiary pursuant to a supply agreement with a German company affiliated with Purico. Payments under these receivables continue to be made.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to loss contingencies resulting from regulation by various federal, state, local and foreign governmental authorities with respect to the environmental impact of our mills. To comply with environmental laws and regulations, we have incurred substantial capital and operating expenditures in past years. We anticipate that environmental regulation of our operations will continue to become more burdensome and that capital and operating expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. In addition, we may incur obligations to remove or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment resulting from our operations, including the restoration of natural resources and liability for personal injury and for damages to property and natural resources. Because environmental regulations are not consistent worldwide, our ability to compete in the world marketplace may be adversely affected by capital and operating expenditures required for environmental compliance.

Spring Grove, PennsylvaniaWe are subject to the “Cluster Rule,” a 1998 federal regulation in which the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) aims to regulate air and water emissions from certain pulp and paper mills, including kraft pulp mills, such as our Spring Grove facility. Issued under both the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, the Cluster Rule establishes baseline emissions limits for toxic and conventional pollutant releases to both water and air.

Subject to permit approvals, we have undertaken an initiative at our Spring Grove facility under the Voluntary Advanced Technical Incentive Program set forth by the EPA in the Cluster Rule. This initiative, the “New Century Project,” will require capital expenditures currently estimated to be approximately $36.8 million to be incurred before April 2004, of which $34.5 million was incurred through December 31, 2003. The New Century Project includes improvements in brownstock washing, installation of an oxygen delignification bleaching process, 100 percent chlorine dioxide substitution and a hardwood ozone bleaching system. We presently do not anticipate difficulties in implementing the New Century Project. While we have obtained all the required governmental approvals, we have yet to bring all the necessary equipment on-line.

We voluntarily cooperated with an investigation byIn 1999, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (the “PA (“DEP”) that commenced in February 2002, relatedissued to certain discharges by our Spring Grove facility to the Codorus Creek. On June 13, 2003, we entered intous a Consent Order and Agreement with the PA DEP regarding such discharges. Under the terms of this agreement, we agreed to pay a civil penalty of $1.5 million over three years, beginning June 15, 2003, and to implement various remedial measures related to the facility’s operations and to the facility’s historical piping network. We accrued $1.5 million in the 2002 fourth quarter results of operations for this obligation. The remedial measures are expected to be recorded as capital expenditures.

In 1999, EPA and the PA DEP issued us separate NoticesNotice of Violation (“NOVs”NOV”) alleging violations of air pollution control laws primarily for purportedly failing to obtain appropriate pre-construction air quality permits in conjunction with certain modifications tothe installation of a turbine generator at our Spring Grove facility.

For all but one of the modifications cited by EPA, we applied for and obtained from the PA DEP the pre-construction permits that we concluded were required by applicable law. EPA reviewed those applications before

- 39 -
GLATFELTER


the permits were issued. The Pennsylvania DEP’s NOV pertained only to thea modification for which we did not receive a pre-construction permit. We conducted an evaluation at the time of this modificationIn October 2004, we entered into a Consent Order and determined that the pre-construction permit cited by EPA and the PA DEP was not required. We have been informed that EPA andAgreement with the Pennsylvania DEP will seek substantial emissions reductions, as well as civil penalties,that requires us to which we believe wepay a $0.1 million penalty, complete certain other corrective actions and install an air pollution control device at the Spring Grove facility, the related capital expenditure requirement does not represent a material amount. This agreement did not have meritorious defenses. We are unable to predict whether these defenses would prevail in litigation. Should a government plaintiff obtain a judgment against us regarding these matters, it is likely that such a judgment would be material toimpact on our consolidated financial position or our results of operations or financial condition.operations.

Neenah, WisconsinWe have previously reported with respect to potential environmental claims arising out of the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) in sediments in the lower Fox River and in the Bay of Green Bay, downstream of our Neenah, Wisconsin facility. We acquired the Neenah facility in 1979 as part of the acquisition of the Bergstrom Paper Company. In part, this facility used wastepaper as a source of fiber. At no time did the Neenah facility utilize PCBs in the pulp and paper making process, but discharges from the facility containing PCBs from wastepaper may have occurred from 1954 to the late 1970s. Any PCBs that the Neenah facility discharged into the Fox River resulted from the



- 42 -

GLATFELTER


presence of NCR®-brand carbonless copy paper in the wastepaper that was received from others and recycled. As described below, various state and federal governmental agencies have formally notified nine potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”), including Glatfelter,us, that they are potentially responsible for response costs and “natural resource damages” (“NRDs”) arising from PCB contamination in the lower Fox River and in the Bay of Green Bay, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and other statutes. The other identified PRPs are NCR Corporation, Appleton Papers Inc., Georgia Pacific Corp. (formerly Fort Howard Corp. and Fort James), WTM I Co. (a subsidiary of Chesapeake Corp.), Riverside Paper Corporation, U.S. Paper Mills Corp. (a subsidiary of Sonoco Products Company), Sonoco Products Company, and Menasha Corporation. We believe some of these PRPs may have corporate or contractual relationships with unidentified entities that may shift monetary obligations arising from the lower Fox River and Bay of Green Bay.

CERCLA establishes a two-part liability structure that makes responsible parties liable for (1) “response costs” associated with the remediation of a release of hazardous substances and (2) NRDs related to that release. Courts have interpreted CERCLA to impose joint and several liabilities on responsible parties for response costs, subject to equitable allocation in certain instances. Prior to a final settlement by all responsible parties and the final cleanup of the contamination, uncertainty regarding the application of such liability will persist.

The areas of the lower Fox River and in the Bay of Green Bay in which the contamination exists are commonly referred to as Operable Unit 1 (“OU1”), which consists of Little Lake Butte des Morts, the portion of the river that is closest to our Neenah facility, Operable Unit 2 (“OU2”) which is the portion of the river between dams at Appleton and Little Rapids and Operable Units 3 through 5 (“OU3–5”), an area approximately 20 miles downstream of our Neenah facility.

The following summarizes the status of our potential exposure:

RESPONSE ACTIONSResponse Actions

OU1 and OU2On January 7, 2003, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (the “Wisconsin DNR”) and EPAthe Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued a Record of Decision (“ROD”) for the cleanup of OU1 and OU2. Subject to extenuating circumstances and alternative solutions arising during the cleanup, the ROD requires the removal of approximately 784,000 cubic yards of sediment from OU1 and no active remediation of OU2. The ROD also requires the monitoring of the two operable units. Wisconsin DNR and EPA estimate that the remedy for these two reaches will cost approximately $75 million but could cost within a range from approximately $52 million to $112 million.

On July 1, 2003, WTM I entered into an Administrative Order on Consent (“AOC”) with EPA and the Wisconsin DNR regarding to the implementation of the Remedial Design for OU1.

On October 1, 2003, the U.S. Department of Justice lodged a consent decree regarding OU1 (“the OU1 Consent Decree”) with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. In the first quarter of 2004, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin entered the OU1 Consent Decree. Under terms of the OU1 Consent Decree, Glatfelter and WTM I each agreed to pay approximately $27 million. This includes $25million, of which $25.0 million from each to be escrowedwas placed in escrow to fund response work associated with remedial actions specified in the December 2002 ROD. In addition, the U.S. EPA agreed to take steps to place $10 million from another source into escrow for the OU1 cleanup. The remaining amount agreed to be paid under the consent decree is for NRD, NRD assessment and Past Costs incurred by the government.

The response work will be managed and/or performed by Glatfelter and WTM I, with governmental oversight, and funded by the amounts placed into escrow. WeBased on information currently available to us, we believe the required remedial actions can be completed with the amount of monies expected to be escrowed.committed under the Consent Decree. If the Consent Decree is terminated due to a lackan insufficiency of escrow funds, Glatfelter and WTM I each remain potentially responsible for the costs necessary to complete the remedial actions.

- 40 -
GLATFELTERThe terms of the OU1 Consent Decree and the underlying escrow agreement restrict the use of the funds to qualifying remediation activities or restoration activities at the lower Fox River. In mid 2004, together with WTM I, we began activities to remediate the area known as OU1. These activities included, among others, construction of de-watering and water-treatment facilities, and commencement of dredging of portions of the OU1. In 2004 we completed dredging, dewatering and disposal activities covering of approximately 18,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment from various locations in OU1.


The terms of the OU1 Consent Decree include provisions to be followed should the escrow account be depleted prior to completion of the response work. In this event, each company would be notified and be provided an opportunity to contribute additional funds to the escrow account and thereby to preserve the OU1 Consent Decree. Should the OU1 Consent Decree be terminated for this reason, each company would lose the protections contained in the settlement and the governments may turn to one or both of usparties for the completion of work in OU1.OU1 clean up. In such a situation, the governments may also seek response work from a third party, or perform the work



- 43 -

GLATFELTER


themselves and seek response costs from any of the identified PRPs, including Glatfelter.

In addition to the $25 million escrow amount discussed above, the OU1 Consent Decree requires that each company pay the governments $375,000 for past response costs. These payments are being made in return for credit to be applied toward each settling company’s potential liability for response costs associated with the entire river. The OU1 Consent Decree also requires the companies to pay certain NRD-related amounts, which are discussed below.

The United States has lodged the OU1 Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, for court review. The United States Department of Justice published a noticeAt December 31, 2004, our portion of the lodgingescrow fund totaled approximately $20.2 million, of the OU1 Consent Decreewhich $7.2 million is recorded in the Federal Register on October 17, 2003, opening a 30-day public comment period. A public meeting was held on October 29, 2003. After compiling any written comments received,accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet under the United States Departmentcaption “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and $13.0 million is included under the caption “Other assets.” As of Justice will, if appropriate, move the Court to enter theDecember 31, 2004, our reserve for environmental liabilities, substantially all of which is for OU1 Consent Decree.remediation activities, totaled $21.1 million.

OU3 – 5On July 28, 2003, the EPA and the Wisconsin DNR issued a ROD (the “Second ROD”) for the cleanup of OU3 – 5. The Second ROD calls for the removal of 6.5 million cubic yards of sediment and certain monitoring at an estimated cost of $324.4 million but could, according to the Second ROD, could cost within a range from approximately $227.0 million to $486.6 million. The most significant component of the estimated costs is attributable to large-scale sediment removal by dredging. We are currently analyzing

During the Second RODfirst quarter of 2004, NCR Corp. and Georgia Pacific Corp. entered into an AOC with the United States EPA under which they agreed to determineperform the feasibility of the remedy set forth therein and its impact, if any, on our potential liability.Remedial Design for OU3-5, thereby accomplishing a first step towards remediation.

We do not believe that we have more than a de minimis share of any equitable distribution of responsibility for a share of liability with respect to OU3–5 after taking into account the location of our Neenah facility relative to the site and considering other work or funds committed or expended by us. However, uncertainty regarding responsibilities for the cleanup of these sites continues due to disagreement over a fair allocation or apportionment of responsibility.

NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGESNatural Resource Damages

The ROD and Second ROD do not place any value on claims for NRDs associated with this matter. As noted above, NRD claims are distinct from costs related to the primary remediation of a Superfund site. Calculating the value of NRD claims is difficult, especially in the absence of a completed remedy for the underlying contamination. The State of Wisconsin, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), four Indian tribes and the Michigan Attorney General have asserted that they possess NRD claims related to the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay.

In June 1994, FWS notified the then identified PRPs that it considered them potentially responsible for NRDs. The federal, tribal and Michigan agencies claiming to be NRD trustees have proceeded with the preparation of an NRD assessment. While the final assessment willhas yet to be delayed until after the selection of a remedy,

completed, the federal trustees released a plan on October 25, 2000 that values their NRDs for injured natural resources between $176 million and $333 million. We believe that the federal NRD assessment is technically and procedurally flawed. We also believe that the NRD claims alleged by the various alleged trustees are legally and factually without merit.

On June 20, 2002, the United States, the State of Wisconsin and the Fort James Operating Company (“Fort James”) lodged a consent decree with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. If entered, that consent decree would resolve certain outstanding claims, primarily NRD claims, against Fort James and a related entity. Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, Fort James would pay $6.2 million in cash to the United States and the State of Wisconsin in settlement of various claims related to NRDs and cost recovery related to dredging of sediments at Deposits 56/57 (downstream from OU1 and OU2). Fort James also agrees to convey 1,063 acres of land to the State and to perform delineated NRD “restoration” projects at a cost of up to $3.9 million.

We submitted comments on the proposed Fort James consent decree to the U.S. Department of Justice. These comments suggest that the United States, the State of Wisconsin and certain alleged natural resource trustees not move to enter this proposed consent decree, due to various procedural and substantive infirmities. Nevertheless, on March 28, 2003, the federal government made such a motion with respect to which the courts have not yet ruled. Because the factual and legal justification the plaintiffs provided for the settlement is vague and specific to the Fort James situation, we are not able to extrapolate an estimated settlement amount for Glatfelter from the proposed consent decree.

- 41 -
GLATFELTER


In addition to the amounts discussed above, theThe OU1 Consent Decree requiresrequired that Glatfelter and WTM I each pay the governments $1.5 million for NRDs for the Fox River site, and $150,000 for NRD assessment costs. Each of these payments is beingwas made in return for credit to be applied toward each settling company’s potential liability for NRDs associated with the entire river.

OTHER INFORMATIONOther Information

The Wisconsin DNR and FWS have published studies, the latter in draft form, estimating the amount of PCBs discharged by each identified PRP to the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay. These reports estimate our Neenah facility’s share of the volumetric discharge to be as high as 27%. We do not believe the volumetric estimates used in these studies are accurate because the studies themselves disclose that they are not accurate and are based on assumptions for which there exists no evidence. We believe that our volumetric contribution is significantly lower than the estimates. Further, we do not believe that a volumetric allocation would constitute an equitable distribution of the potential liability for the contamination. Other factors, such as the location of contamination, location of discharge and a party’s role in causing discharge must be considered in order for the allocation to be equitable.

We have entered into interim cost-sharing agreements with four of the other PRPs, pursuant to which such PRPs have agreed to share both defense costs and costs for scientific studies relating to PCBs discharged into the lower Fox River. These interim cost-sharing agreements have no bearing on the final allocation of costs related to this matter. Based upon our evaluation of the magnitude, nature and location of the various discharges of PCBs to the river and the relationship of those discharges to identified contamination, we believe our share of any liability among the identified PRPs is much less than our per capita share.share of the cost sharing agreement.

We also believe that there exist additional potentially responsible parties other than the identified PRPs. For instance, certain of the identified PRPs discharged their wastewater through public wastewater treatment facilities, which we believe makes the owners of such facilities potentially responsible in this matter. We also believe that entities providing wastepaper-containing PCBs to each of the recycling mills are also potentially responsible for this matter.



We believe- 44 -

GLATFELTER


While the OU1 Consent Decree is a significant milestone in our continuing negotiations to resolve anyclarifies exposure we may have with regard to the Fox River site, and that the agreement provides further clarity on the financial commitment that may be required of us. Notwithstanding these developments, the OU1 Consent Decreeit does not completely resolve our potential liability related to the Fox River site.this matter. We continue to believe that this matter may result in litigation, but cannot predict the timing, nature, extent or magnitude of such litigation. We currently are unable to predict our ultimate cost related to this matter.

Reserves for Environmental LiabilitiesWe have reserves for environmental liabilities with contractual obligations and for those environmental matters for which it is probable that a claim will be made, that an obligation may exist and for which the amount of the obligation is reasonably estimable. AsThe following table summarizes information with respect to such reserves as of December 31, 2003,2004 and December 31, 2002, we had accrued reserves for asserted and unasserted2003.

          
  December 31, 
In millions 2004   2003 
    
Recorded as:
         
Environmental liabilities $7.7   $27.0 
Other long-term liabilities  13.9    2.4 
      
Total $21.6   $29.4 
    

The classification of our environmental liabilities related to environmental matters of approximately $29.4 million and $30.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2003, $27.0 millionis based on the development of the reserves are recorded as current liabilities inunderlying remediation plan and execution of the caption “environmental liabilities” and $2.4 million are included in “other long-term liabilities,” onrelated escrow agreement for the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2002, these accruals are primarily included in “other long-term liabilities.” During 2003, thefunding thereof. The reserve balance declined $0.5 million as a result of payments associated with remediation activities under the first of three installment payments made to the PA DEP. With respectOU1 Consent Decree and items related to the Fox River site, in 2001 we accrued and chargedmatter. We did not record charges to pre-tax earnings $2.4 million. No amounts were accrued in 2002our results of operations during 2004 or 2003. In the fourth quarter of 2002, we accrued $1.5 million2003 related to the PA DEP matter. these matters.

Other than with respect to the OU1 Consent Decree, and the settlement with the Pennsylvania DEP regarding water issues at the Spring Grove mill, the amount and timing of future expenditures for environmental compliance, cleanup, remediation and personal injury, NRDs and property damage liabilityliabilities cannot be ascertained with any certainty due to, among other things, the unknown extent and nature of any contamination, the extent and timing of any technological advances for pollution abatement, the response actions that may be required, the availability of qualified remediation contractors, equipment and landfill space and the number and financial resources of any other parties.

Range of Reasonably Possible Outcomes – Neenah, WisconsinAs discussed above, the OU1 Consent Decree solidifies the financial commitment that may be required of us regarding responseBased on currently available information, including actual remediation costs relatedincurred to OU1. Wedate, we believe that the remediation of OU1 will be satisfactorily completed for the amounts currently expected to be committed under the OU1 Consent Decree. Our assessment is dependent, in part, on successful use of anticipated dredging techniques and the ultimate extent of such dredging, and on the successful negotiation of acceptable contracts to complete remediation related activities.

The OU1 Consent Decree does not address response costs necessary to remediate the remainder of the Fox River site

and only addresses NRDs and claims for reimbursement of government expenses to a limited extent. Due to judicial interpretations that find CERCLA imposes with respect to joint and several liability, uncertainty persists regarding

- 42 -
GLATFELTER


our exposure with respect to the remainder of the Fox River site.

Based on our analysis of currently available information and experience regarding the cleanup of hazardous substances, we believe that it is reasonably possible that our costs associated with the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay may exceed currentour reserves by amounts that may prove to be insignificant or that could range, in the aggregate, up to approximately $125$115 million, over a period that is undeterminable but could range beyond 20 years. We believe that the likelihood of an outcome in the upper end of the monetary range is significantly less than other possible outcomes within the range and that the possibility of an outcome in excess of the upper end of the monetary range is remote.

In our estimate of the upper end of the range, we have considered: (i) the remedial actions agreed to in the OU1 Consent Decree and our belief that the required actions can be accomplished with the funds to be escrowed under the OU1 Consent Decree; and (ii) no active remediation of OU2. We have also assumed full-scale dredging for the remainder of the River and the Bay of Green Bay, as set forth in the Second ROD, although at a significantly higher cost than estimated in the Second ROD. We have also assumed our share of the ultimate liability to be 18%, which is significantly higher than we believe is appropriate or than we will incur and a level of NRD claims and claims for reimbursement of expenses from other parties that, although reasonably possible, is unlikely.

In estimating both our current reservereserves for environmental remediation and other environmental liabilities and the possible range of additional costs, we have not assumed that we will bear the entire cost of remediation and damages to the exclusion of other known PRPs who may be jointly and severally liable. The ability of other PRPs to participate has been taken into account, generally based generally on their financial condition and probable contribution. Our evaluation of the other PRPs’ financial condition included the review of publicly disclosed financial information. Furthermore, we believe certain of these PRPs have corporate or contractual relationships with additional entities that may shift monetary obligations arising from the lower Fox River and Bay of Green Bay. The relative probable contribution is based upon our knowledge that at least two PRPs manufactured the paper and arranged for the disposal of the wastepaper that included the PCBs and as such, in our opinion, bear a higher level of responsibility.

In addition, our assessment is based upon the magnitude, nature and location of the various discharges of PCBs to



- 45 -

GLATFELTER


the river and the relationship of those discharges to identified contamination. We have also considered that over a number of years, certain PRPsfacilities were under the ownership of large multinational companies whichthat appear to retain some liability for this matter. We continue to evaluate our exposure and the level of our reserves, including, but not limited to, our potential share of the costs and NRDs, (if any)if any, associated with the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay.

We believe that we are insured against certain losses related to the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay, depending on the nature and amount of the losses. On July 30, 2003, we filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court for the County of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, against our insurers, seeking damages for breach of contract and declaratory relief related to such losses. One of the insurers that is a defendant in our Wisconsin litigation has filed a counter-suit against us in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The filing of our lawsuit followed the issuance of a Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion regarding environmental coverage issues that is favorable to policyholders. The Company has beenIn 2004, we reached successful resolution of certain claims under insurance policies related to the Fox River environmental matter. Insurance recoveries included in settlement discussions with certain defendantsthe results of operations for the year ended 2004 totaled $32.8 million and were fully received in this matter. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any amounts for such potential recoveries. See Note 22 - “Subsequent Events.”cash prior to the end of the year.

SummaryOur current assessment is that we should be able to manage these environmental matters without a long-term, material adverse impact on us.the Company. These matters could, however, at any particular time or for any particular year or years, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and/or results of operations or could result in a default under our loan covenants. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our reserves will be adequate to provide for future obligations related to these matters, that our share of costs and/or damages for these matters will not exceed our available resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term, material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations. With regard to the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay, if we are not successful in managing the implementation of the OU1 Consent Decree and/or if we are ordered to implement the remedy proposed in the Second ROD, such developments maycould have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and results of operations and may result in a default under our loan covenants.

We are also involved in other lawsuits that are ordinary and incidental to our business. The ultimate outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we do not expect that such lawsuits in the aggregate or individually will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations.



- 4346 -

GLATFELTER


20. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

WeIn connection with the implementation of the North American Restructuring Program and other initiatives, during 2004, we changed the way we manage our organization along separate business units: Engineered Products, Long-Fiberand transitioned from three distinct business units to two: the Europe-based Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit and the North America-based Specialty Papers business unit. While the Long Fiber & Overlay Papers business unit remains unchanged, the formation of the Specialty Papers business unit, which consists of the former Engineered Products and the Printing & Converting Papers as well as Tobacco Papers, which are sold pursuantbusiness units, allows us to more effectively manage the demand planning process, optimize product mix, minimize process variability and meet the demands of our customers. As a supply agreement that expires in mid-2004. Inresult of this transition, all segment data has been restated to give effect to the latter partfurther refinement of 2002, we completed the implementation of a new information system to provide, among other things, more complete business unit reporting. However, we are unable to provide all of the financial information identified in SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures of an Enterprise and Related Information.”our organizational structure discussed above.

The following table sets forth profitability and other information by business unit:unit for the year ended December 31:

         
  Year Ended
  December 31, 2003
  Operating Profit  
Dollars in thousands
 (Loss)
 Operating Margin
Business Unit
        
Engineered Products $(452)  (0.3)%
Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers  14,737   10.9%
Printing and Converting Papers  (8,805)  (3.5)%
Tobacco Papers  (5,758)  (58.6)%
   
 
     
Total Business Unit  (278)  (0.1)%
Energy sales, net  10,040     
Pension income, net  17,149     
Restructuring charges – COS  (6,511)    
Restructuring charges – SG&A  (6,983)    
Unusual items  (11,501)    
Gain on disposition of plant, equipment and timberlands  32,334     
   
 
     
Total operating income  34,250     
Interest expense  (14,269)    
Other income (expense), net  435     
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $20,416     
   
 
     
                                                     
  Specialty Papers  Long Fiber & Overlay  Other and Unallocated  Total 
In millions 2004   2003  2002  2004   2003  2002  2004   2003  2002  2004   2003  2002 
               
Net sales $337   $358  $385  $205   $165  $135  $1   $10  $20  $543   $533  $540 
Energy sales, net  10    10   10                       10    10   10 
               
Total revenue  347    368   395   205    165   135   1    10   20   553    543   550 
Costs of products sold  312    326   329   164    131   103   1    15   19   477    471   451 
               
Gross profit  35    42   66   41    34   32       (5)  1   76    72   99 
SG&A  38    44   44   23    17   14          1   61    61   59 
Pension income                            (17)   (17)  (33)  (17)   (17)  (33)
Restructuring recorded as component of COS                                7          7    
Restructuring charges                            20    7   4   20    7   4 
Unusual items                                12   (2)      12   (2)
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands                            (58)   (32)  (1)  (58)   (32)  (1)
Gain on insurance recoveries                            (33)         (33)       
               
Total operating income (loss)  (3)   (2)  22   18    17   18   88    19   32   103    34   72 
Nonoperating income (expense)                            (13)   (14)  (13)  (13)   (14)  (13)
               
Income from continuing operations before income taxes $(3)  $(2) $22  $18   17  18  $75   5  19  $90   20  59 
             
                                                     
Supplemental Data
                                                    
Plant, equipment and timberlands, net $351   377  396  $169   $166  $121            $520   543  517 
Depreciation expense  37    44   35   14    12   10             51    56   45 
             

Results of individual business units are presented based on our management accounting practices and management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore, the financial results of individual business units are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined from time to time as management accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. Costs to produce products sold are allocated to the respective business unit based on standard costs and a proportion of manufacturing variances. The costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area services. Assets are not allocated to the business units for management reporting purposes and accordingly, are not presented herein.services

Management evaluates results of operations before energy sales, non-cash pension income, restructuring related charges, unusual items, and effects of asset dispositiondispositions and insurance recoveries because it believes this is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of business units and the extent of cash flow generated from core operations. This presentation is closely aligned with the management and operating structure of our company. It is also on this basis that Company’s performance is evaluated internally and by the Company’s Board of Directors.

The following table sets forth information with respect to net sales for each business unit:

             
  Year Ended December 31
In thousands
 2003
 2002
 2001
Business Unit            
Engineered Products $137,246  $123,610  $113,533 
Long-Fiber & Overlay Papers  135,047   110,441   99,816 
Printing and Converting Papers  251,085   286,448   295,681 
Tobacco Papers  9,815   19,848   32,736 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
Total excluding Ecusta  533,193   540,347   541,766 
Ecusta Division        90,836 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
Total $533,193  $540,347  $632,602 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 

We sell a significant portion of our specialty papers through wholesale paper merchants. No individual customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in 2004, 2003 2002 or 2001.2002.



- 4447 -

GLATFELTER


Our 2004, 2003 2002, and 20012002 net sales to external customers and location of net plant, equipment and timberlands as of December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002 are summarized below. Net sales are attributed to countries based upon origin of shipment. The net sales information below includes the results of the Ecusta Division through August 9, 2001.

                                              
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 
 Plant, Plant, Plant, Plant,   Plant, Plant, 
 Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and   Equipment and Equipment and 
In thousands
 Net Sales
 Timberlands – Net
 Net Sales
 Timberlands – Net
 Net Sales
 Timberlands – Net
 Net sales Timberlands – Net   Net sales Timberlands – Net Net sales Timberlands – Net 
     
United States $367,903 $377,182 $386,458 $396,160 $477,437 $391,510  $353,284 $351,086   $367,903 $377,182 $386,458 $396,160 
Germany 138,630 147,651 128,574 104,477 129,228 89,473  156,337 149,513   138,630 147,651 128,574 104,477 
Other 26,660 18,127 25,315 16,416 25,937 14,549  33,903 19,813   26,660 18,127 25,315 16,416 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Total $533,193 $542,960 $540,347 $517,053 $632,602 $495,532  $543,524 $520,412   $533,193 $542,960 $540,347 $517,053 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    

21. QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)

In thousands, except per share

                        
                            Diluted 
 Diluted Net sales Gross Profit Net Income Earnings Per Share 
 Net Sales
 Gross Profit
 Net Income
 Earnings Per Share
 2004 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 
 2003
 2002
 2003
 2002
 2003
 2002
 2003
 2002
              
First $142,286 $131,288 $30,307 $34,355 $26,777 $11,124 $0.61 $0.26  $132,078   $142,286 $20,499   $30,307 $36,258   $26,777 $0.83   $0.61 
Second 129,620 136,693 18,269 28,796 269 7,576 0.01 0.17  129,029   129,620 16,042   18,269  (1,629)  269  (0.04)  0.01 
Third 131,904 135,105 19,957 33,559  (6,665) 13,311  (0.15) 0.30  143,075   131,904 27,042   19,957 2,199    (6,665) 0.05    (0.15)
Fourth 129,383 137,261 11,013 29,571  (7,720) 5,584  (0.18) 0.13  139,342   129,383 28,831   11,013 19,274    (7,720) 0.44    (0.18)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
Total $533,193 $540,347 $79,546 $126,281 $12,661 $37,595 $0.29 $0.86  $543,524   $533,193 $92,414   $79,546 $56,102   $12,661 $1.28   $0.29 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          

A reconciliation ofThe information set forth above includes the amounts presented above to the amounts previously reported in our Quarterly Reportfollowing on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:

             
  Originally Discontinued  
In thousands
 Reported
 Operations
 Adjusted
First Quarter 2003
            
Net Sales $143,614  $(1,328) $142,286 
Gross Profit  30,629   (322)  30,307 
First Quarter2002
            
Net Sales  131,998   (710)  131,288 
Gross Profit  18,683   (414)  18,269 

Net income for the third and fourth quarter of 2003 and 2002 includes restructuring charges and unusual items that are fully described in Notes 5 and 7.

22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In February 2004, we completed the previously announced sale of 1,187 acres of timberland (the “Delaware Timberland”) for $17.1 million in cash. We also completed the previously announced sale of approximately 900 acres of timberland commonly known as Ponders (the “Ponders Timberland”) for $7.7 million in cash. We recognized a pre-tax gain totaling approximately $22.4 million from these timberland sales.

Also in February 2004, we entered into settlement agreements with certain of our insurance carriers relating to recoveries for various environmental liabilities incurred by the Company associated with the Lower Fox River and Bay of Green Bay in Wisconsin. Under terms of the settlement agreements, the insurance carriers agreed to pay us an aggregate of $25.2 million. Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, do not include any amounts for such recoveries.after-tax basis:

                                 
          Gains on Sales of Plant,            
          Equipment and            
  Restructuring Charges and  Timberlands, and Other          Diluted 
  Unusual Items  Asset Sales  Insurance Recoveries  Earnings Per Share 
In thousands 2004  2003  2004  2003  2004  2003  2004  2003 
 
First $  $  $19,559  $19,311  $15,221  $  $0.80  $0.44 
Second  (524)           181      (0.01)   
Third  (10,249)  (10,330)  947      5,908      (0.08)  (0.23)
Fourth  (1,950)  (7,258)  13,558            0.27   (0.17)
   
Total $(12,723) $(17,588) $34,064  $19,311  $21,310     $0.98  $0.03 
 

- 4548 -

GLATFELTER


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.Procedures

Our chief executive officer and our principalchief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), as of December 31, 2003,2004, have concluded that, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) and the related report of our independent registered public accounting firm are included in Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Changes Inin Internal ControlsControl over Financial Reporting

There waswere no changesignificant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2003,2004, that has materially affected or isare reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. In the course of completing our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting we implemented certain changes and enhancements to our controls. These primarily related to segregation of duties and documentation of the functioning of controls.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Directors.Directors. The information with respect to directors required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to pages 6 through 7 of our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March 24, 2004.25, 2005. Our board of directors has determined that, based on the relevant experience of the members of the Audit Committee, the members areaudit committee financial expertsas this term is set forth in the applicable regulations of the SEC.

Executive Officers of the Registrant.Registrant. The information with respect to the executive officers required under this Item is

set forth in Part I of this report.

We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers in compliance with applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that applies to its principalour chief executive officer, its principalchief financial officer and itsour principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct is filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is available on our website, free of charge, at www.glatfelter.com.www.glatfelter.com.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to pages 10 through 16 of our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March ^ 24, 2004.25, 2005.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to pages 21 through 23 of our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March ^ 24, 2004.25, 2005.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to page 20 of our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March ^ 24, 2004.25, 2005.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to pages 9 through 18 of our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March ^ 24, 2004.25, 2005.



- 4649 -

GLATFELTER


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

         
(a)  1.    Our Consolidated Financial Statements as follows are included in Part II, Item 8:
       
     i. Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002
     ii. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20032004 and 20022003
     iii. Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ EquityCash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002
     iv. Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsShareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002
     v. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 2002 and 20012002
         
  2.    Financial Statement Schedules (Consolidated) are included in Part IV:
         
     i. Schedule II -Valuation and Qualifying Accounts - For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2003
(b)Current Report on Form 8-K
The following Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended December 31, 2003, or thereafter:
Pursuant to
Date of Report
Description
Item No.
October 1, 2003Reporting we entered into a Consent Decree regarding the remediation of certain portions of the Lower Fox River.5
October 1, 2003Amendment No. 1 for purposes of filing as an exhibit the Lower Fox River Consent Decree.5
October 2, 2003Announcing we had entered into an agreement to sell timberlands.5
October 22, 2003Reporting the issuance of an earnings press release for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003.5
February 6, 2004Reporting the issuance of an earnings press release for the three months and full year ended December 31, 2003.

- 4750 -

GLATFELTER


(c) Exhibit Index

             
            Incorporated by
Exhibit Number
 Description of Documents
     Reference to
        Exhibit
 (Filing)
(2)   Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement dated as of August 9, 2001 by and among Purico (IOM) Limited, RF & Son Inc., RFS US Inc. and RFS Ecusta Inc., as Buyers, and P. H. Glatfelter Company and Mollanvick, Inc., as Sellers  2  August 24, 2001 Form 8-K
             
(3) (a) Articles of Amendment dated April 27, 1977, including restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended by;  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
             
   i. Articles of Merger dated January 30, 1979  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
             
   ii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated May 12, 1980  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
             
   iii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated September 23, 1981  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
             
   iv. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated August 2, 1982  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
             
   v. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated July 29, 1983  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
             
   vi. Articles of Amendment dated April 25, 1984  3(a) 1994 Form 10-K
             
   vii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated October 15, 1984  3(b) 1984 Form 10-K
             
   viii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated December 24, 1985  3(b) 1985 Form 10-K
             
   ix. Articles of Amendment dated April 23, 1986  (3) March 31, 1986 Form 10-Q
             
   x. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated July 11, 1986  3(b) 1986 Form 10-K
             
   xi. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated March 25, 1988  3(b) 1987 Form 10-K
             
   xii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated November 9, 1988  3(b) 1988 Form 10-K
             
   xiii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated April 24, 1989  3(b) 1989 Form 10-K
             
   xiv. Articles of Amendment dated November 29, 1990  3(b) 1990 Form 10-K
             
   xv. Articles of Amendment dated June 26, 1991  3(b) 1991 Form 10-K
             
   xvi. Articles of Amendment dated August 7, 1992  3(b) 1992 Form 10-K
             
   xvii. Articles of Amendment dated July 30, 1993  3(b) 1993 Form 10-K
             
   xviii. Articles of Amendment dated January 26, 1994  3(b) 1993 Form 10-K
             
  (b) Articles of Incorporation, as amended through January 26, 1994 (restated for the purpose of filing on EDGAR)  3(c) 1993 Form 10-K
             
  (c) By-Laws as amended through March 10, 2004, filed herewith.      
             
4 (a) Indenture, dated as of July 22, 1997, between P. H. Glatfelter Company and The Bank of New York, relating to the 6-7/8 Notes due 2007  4.1  Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-36395
             
  (b) Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 22, 1997, among P. H. Glatfelter Company, Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. and BT Securities Corporation, relating to the 6-7/8 Notes due 2007  4.3  Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-36395
             
9   P. H. Glatfelter Family Shareholders’ Voting Trust dated July 1, 1993  1  Schedule 13D filed by P. H. Glatfelter Family Shareholders’ Voting Trust dated July 1, 1993
             
10 (a) P. H. Glatfelter Company Management Incentive Plan, adopted as of January 1, 1994, as amended and restated December 19, 2000 and effective January 1, 2001  10(a) 2000 Form 10-K**
             
  (b) P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective April 23, 1998 and further amended December 20, 2000  10(c) 2000 Form 10-K**
             
  (c) Description of Executive Salary Continuation Plan  10(g) 1990 Form 10-K**
             
  (d) P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Management Pension Plan, effective as of April 23, 1998  10(f) 1998 Form 10-K**
             
  (e) P. H. Glatfelter Company 1992 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended December 20, 2000  10(g) 2000 Form 10-K **
             
  (f) P. H. Glatfelter Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, effective as of April 22, 1998  10(h) 1998 Form 10-K**
             
  (g) Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and George H. Glatfelter II, dated as of December 31, 2000  10(i) 2000 Form 10-K **
             
  (h) Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, dated as of December 31, 2000  10.1  June 30, 2003 Form 10-Q **
               
              Incorporated by
Exhibit Number Description of Documents     Reference to
          Exhibit (Filing)
(2)     Amended and Restated Acquisition Agreement dated as of August 9, 2001 by and among Purico (IOM) Limited, RF & Son Inc., RFS US Inc. and RFS Ecusta Inc., as Buyers, and P. H. Glatfelter Company and Mollanvick, Inc., as Sellers.  2  August 24, 2001 Form 8-K
               
(3) (a)   Articles of Amendment dated April 27, 1977, including restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended by:  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
               
     i. Articles of Merger dated January 30, 1979  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
               
     ii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated May 12, 1980  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
               
     iii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated September 23, 1981  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
               
     iv. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated August 2, 1982  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
               
     v. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated July 29, 1983  3(a) 1993 Form 10-K
               
     vi. Articles of Amendment dated April 25, 1984  3(a) 1994 Form 10-K
               
     vii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated October 15, 1984  3(b) 1984 Form 10-K
               
     viii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated December 24, 1985  3(b) 1985 Form 10-K
               
     ix. Articles of Amendment dated April 23, 1986  (3) March 31, 1986 Form 10-Q
               
     x. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated July 11, 1986  3(b) 1986 Form 10-K
               
     xi. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated March 25, 1988  3(b) 1987 Form 10-K
               
     xii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated November 9, 1988  3(b) 1988 Form 10-K
               
     xiii. Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated April 24, 1989  3(b) 1989 Form 10-K
               
     xiv. Articles of Amendment dated November 29, 1990  3(b) 1990 Form 10-K
               
     xv. Articles of Amendment dated June 26, 1991  3(b) 1991 Form 10-K
               
     xvi. Articles of Amendment dated August 7, 1992  3(b) 1992 Form 10-K
               
     xvii. Articles of Amendment dated July 30, 1993  3(b) 1993 Form 10-K
               
     xviii. Articles of Amendment dated January 26, 1994  3(b) 1993 Form 10-K
               
  (b)   Articles of Incorporation, as amended through January 26, 1994 (restated for the purpose of filing on EDGAR)  3(c) 1993 Form 10-K
               
  (c)   By-Laws as amended through March 9, 2005, filed herewith.      
               
4 (a)   Indenture, dated as of July 22, 1997, between P. H. Glatfelter Company and The Bank of New York, relating to the 6-7/8 Notes due 2007.  4.1  Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-36395
               
  (b)   Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 22, 1997, among P. H. Glatfelter Company, Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. and BT Securities Corporation, relating to the 6-7/8 Notes due 2007.  4.3  Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-36395
               
10 (a)   P. H. Glatfelter Company Management Incentive Plan, adopted as of January 1, 1994, as amended and restated December 19, 2000 and effective January 1, 2001.  10(a) 2000 Form 10-K**
               
  (b)   P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective April 23, 1998 and further amended December 20, 2000.  10(c) 2000 Form 10-K**
               
  (c)   Description of Executive Salary Continuation Plan.  10(g) 1990 Form 10-K**
               
  (d)   P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Management Pension Plan, effective as of April 23, 1998.  10(f) 1998 Form 10-K**
               
  (e)   P. H. Glatfelter Company 1992 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended December 20, 2000.  10(g) 2000 Form 10-K **
               
  (f)   P. H. Glatfelter Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, effective as of April 22, 1998.  10(h) 1998 Form 10-K**
               
  (g)   Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and George H. Glatfelter II, dated as of December 31, 2000.  10(i) 2000 Form 10-K **
               
  (h)   Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, dated as of December 31, 2000.  10.1  June 30, 2003 Form 10-Q **

- 4851 -

GLATFELTER


               
              Incorporated by
Exhibit Number Description of Documents     Reference to
          Exhibit (Filing)
  (h) (A) Schedule of Change in Control Employment Agreements, filed herewith. **      
               
  (i)   Loan Agreement, dated February 24, 1997, between P. H. Glatfelter Company, as borrower, and GWS Valuch, Inc., as lender.  10(h) 1996 Form 10-k
               
  (j)   Agreement between the State of Wisconsin and Certain Companies Concerning the Fox River, dated as of January 31, 1997, among P. H. Glatfelter Company, Fort Howard Corporation, NCR Corporation, Appleton Papers Inc., Riverside Paper Corporation, U.S. Paper Mills, Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. and the State of Wisconsin.  10(i) 1996 Form 10-K
               
  (k)   Credit Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2002, among P. H. Glatfelter Company, various subsidiary borrowers, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as Agent, and various lending institutions with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Runner.  10.1  June 30, 2002 Form 10-Q
               
  (l)   Increase in Commitments and Lender Addition Agreement.  10.1  September 30, 2002 Form 10Q
               
  (m)   Supply and Service Agreement dated as of August 1, 2001 by and among Purico GmbH, Purico (IOM) Limited and Papierfabrik Schoeller & Hoesch GmbH & Co.  10(s) 2001 Form 10-K
               
  (n)   Contract for the Purchase and Bargain Sale of Property (exhibits omitted).  10(m) 2002 Form 10-K
               
  (o)   Employment agreement between the Registrant and John C. van Roden, Jr., Chief Financial Officer.  10.1  March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q**
               
  (p)   Severance Agreement and General Release between Mr. C. Matthew Smith and the Registrant, dated January 31, 2005.  10.1  January 31, 2005 Form 8-K
               
  (q)   Term Loan Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2003, among GPW Timberlands, LLC, (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant) and Suntrust Bank, as Administrative Agent.  10.3  March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q
               
  (r)   Consent Decree for Remedial Design and Remedial Action at Operable Unit 1 of the Lower Fox River and Green Bay site by and among the United States of America and the State of Wisconsin v. P. H. Glatfelter Company and WTMI Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills, Inc.).  10.2  October 1, 2003 Form 8-K/A – No. 1
               
  (s)   Employment agreement between the Registrant and John Jacunski, Vice President and Corporate Controller.  10(u) 2003 Form 10-K**
               
  (t)   Compensatory Arrangements with Certain Executive Officers, filed herewith.**      
               
  (u)   Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation, (effective January 1, 2005).  10.1  December 15, 2004 Form 8-K
               
  (v)   Contract for the Purchase and Sale of Property, dated September 21, 2004, among Glatfelter Pulp Wood Company, The Conservation Fund and Stewart Title Guaranty Company.  10.1  September 21, 2004 Form 8-K
             
14     Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers of Glatfelter.  14  2003 Form 10-K
               
21     Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith.      
               
23     Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed herewith.      
               
31.1     Certification of George H. Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302 (a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, filed herewith.      
               
31.2     Certification of John C. van Roden, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302 (a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, filed herewith.      
               
32.1     Certification of George H. Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.      
               
32.2     Certification of John C. van Roden, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.      
             
            Incorporated by
Exhibit Number
 Description of Documents
     Reference to
        Exhibit
 (Filing)
  (i) Schedule of Change in Control Employment Agreements by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and other employees which have not been filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K).      
             
  (j)(A)      Schedule of Change in Control Employment Agreements, filed herewith.      
             
  (k) Loan Agreement, dated February 24, 1997, between P. H. Glatfelter Company, as borrower, and GWS Valuch, Inc., as lender  10(h) 1996 Form 10-k
             
  (l) Agreement between the State of Wisconsin and Certain Companies Concerning the Fox River, dated as of January 31, 1997, among P. H. Glatfelter Company, Fort Howard Corporation, NCR Corporation, Appleton Papers Inc., Riverside Paper Corporation, U.S. Paper Mills, Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. and the State of Wisconsin  10(i) 1996 Form 10-K
             
  (m) Credit Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2002, among P. H. Glatfelter Company, various subsidiary borrowers, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as Agent, and various lending institutions with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as Lead Arranger and Book Runner  10.1  June 30, 2002 Form 10-Q
             
  (n) Increase in Commitments and Lender Addition Agreement  10.1  September 30, 2002 Form 10Q
             
  (o) Supply and Service Agreement dated as of August 1, 2001 by and among Purico GmbH, Purico (IOM) Limited and Papierfabrik Schoeller & Hoesch GmbH & Co.  10(s)  2001 Form 10-K
             
  (p) Contract for the Purchase and Bargain Sale of Property (exhibits omitted)  10(m) 2002 Form 10-K
             
  (q) Employment agreement between the Registrant and John C. van Roden, Jr., Chief Financial Officer  10.1  March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q
             
  (r) Severance agreement between the Registrant and Robert C. Newcomer, President and Chief Operating Officer (exhibits omitted).  10.2  March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q
             
  (s) Term Loan Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2003, among GPW Timberlands, LLC, (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant) and Suntrust Bank, as Administrative Agent.  10.3  March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q
             
  (t) Consent Decree for Remedial Design and Remedial Action at Operable Unit 1 of the Lower Fox River and Green Bay site by and among the United States of America and the State of Wisconsin v. P. H. Glatfelter Company and WTMI Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills, Inc.  10.2  October 1, 2003 Form 8-K/A – No. 1
             
  (u) Employment agreement between the Registrant and John Jacunski, Vice President and Corporate Controller, filed herewith.      
             
14   Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers of Glatfelter, filed herewith.      
             
21   Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith.      
             
23   Consent of Independent Auditors, filed herewith.      
             
31.1   Certification of George H. Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302 (a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, filed herewith.      
             
31.2   Certification of John C. van Roden, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302 (a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, filed herewith.      
             
32.1   Certification of George H. Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.      
             
32.2   Certification of John C. van Roden, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.      
             
  
   **Management contract or compensatory plan      


**Management contract or compensatory plan

- 4952 -

GLATFELTER


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

     
  P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
  (Registrant)
March 10, 2004
16, 2005    
 By /s/ George H. Glatfelter II
   
 
   George H. Glatfelter II
   Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

     
Date
 Signature
 Capacity
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ George H. Glatfelter II
George H. Glatfelter II
 Principal Executive Officer and Director

George H. Glatfelter II
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
     
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ John C. van Roden, Jr.
John C. van Roden, Jr.
 Principal Financial Officer
 
John C. van Roden, Jr.
SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief  
 Financial Officer  
     
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ John P. JacunskiController

John P. Jacunski Controller
 Vice President and Corporate Controller  
     
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ Kathleen A. DahlbergDirector

Kathleen A. Dahlberg Director
     
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ Nicholas DeBenedictisDirector

Nicholas DeBenedictis Director
     
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ J. Robert HallRichard C. Ill
Richard C. Ill
 Director

J. Robert Hall
     
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ M. A. Johnson IIJ. Robert Hall
J. Robert Hall
 Director

M. A. Johnson II
     
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ Ronald J. NaplesM. A. Johnson II
M. A. Johnson II
 Director

Ronald J. Naples
     
March 10, 200416, 2005 /s/ Richard L. SmootRonald J. Naples
Ronald J. Naples
 Director

Richard L. Smoot
     
March 10, 200416, 2005/s/ Richard L. Smoot
Richard L. Smoot
Director
March 16, 2005 /s/ Lee C. StewartDirector

Lee C. Stewart Director

- 5053 -

GLATFELTER


Schedule II

P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 20032004
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

                                         
 Allowances for
 Allowances for 
 Doubtful Accounts
 Sales Discounts and Deductions
 Doubtful Accounts Sales Discounts and Deductions 
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2003
 2002
 2001
 2004 2003 2002 2004 2003 2002 
Balance, beginning of year $2,211 $1,551 $1,515 $1,662 $1,624 $1,069  $3,115   $2,211 $1,551 $2,038   $1,662 $1,624 
Other(a)  168(a)  157(a)  (240)  266(a)  199(a)  (70) 24   168 157 162   266 199 
Provision 1,098 732 861 1,604 12,172 11,499  868   1,098 732 3,964   1,604 12,172 
Write-offs, recoveries and discounts allowed  (362)  (229)  (585)  (1,494)  (12,333)  (10,874)  (1,643)   (362)  (229)  (3,947)   (1,494)  (12,333)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
Balance, end of year $3,115 $2,211 $1,551 $2,038 $1,662 $1,624  $2,364   $3,115 $2,211 $2,217   $2,038 $1,662 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
`        

The provision for doubtful accounts is included in administrative expense and the provision for sales discounts and deductions is deducted from sales. The related allowances are deducted from accounts receivable.

(a)Relates primarily to changes in currency exchange rates
(b)Relates primarily to the sale of the Ecusta Division


(a) Relates primarily to changes in currency exchange rates

- 5154 -

GLATFELTER