UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FormFORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
   
(MARK ONE)þ 
þ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

OR
  FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
OR
o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM          TO          
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROMTO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-11204
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
PENNSYLVANIA
25-1424278

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 25-1424278
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
MAIN & FRANKLIN STREETS,
P.O. BOX 430, JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA
(Address of principal executive offices)
 15907-0430
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(814) 533-5300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
   
Title of Each Class
 
Title Of Each Class
Name ofOf Each Exchange onOn Which Registered
 
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
   
COMMON STOCK,Common Stock, $2.50 PAR VALUESHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS
Par Value
(Title of class)
 Share Purchase Rights
(Title of class)
     
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.o Yes oþ Noþ
     
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.o Yes oþ Noþ
     
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ No Yeso No
     
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.þ
     
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
       
Large accelerated filero
 Accelerated filerþ Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting companyo
     
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No Yesþ No
     
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. The aggregate market value was $97,535,834$65,115,304 as of June 30, 2007.2008.
     
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. There were 22,178,33521,135,466 shares outstanding as of January 31, 2008.2009.
     
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
     
List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of theForm 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (e) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).
     
Portions of the annual shareholders’ report for the year ended December 31, 2007,2008, are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II.
     
Portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders’ meeting are incorporated by reference in Part III.
     
Exhibit Index is located on page 88.74.
 


 

FORM 10-K INDEX
FORM 10-K INDEX
       
    Page No.
  Business  2
Item 1. 
Business  3
Item 1A.Risk Factors  12 
Unresolved Staff Comments  Unresolved Staff Comments15
Item 2.Properties  1615 
Item 3.Legal Proceedings  Properties1615 
4. Legal Proceedings16
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  1715 
PART II
  
Item 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  1716 
Selected Consolidated Financial Data  Selected Consolidated Financial Data1918 
 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations  20 
 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk  4035 
 Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  4136 
 Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting and Financial Disclosure  8671 
Controls and Procedures  Controls and Procedures71
Item 9B.Other Information  8671 
PART III  Other Information  86 
PART III
 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant  8671 
Executive Compensation  Executive Compensation8671 
 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  8671 
 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence  8771 
 Principal Accounting Fees and Services  8772 
PART IV
  
Item 15.Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports onForm 8-K  8772 
 Signatures  Signatures74
Agreement, dated February 1, 2004, Allan R. Dennison as amended on January 24, 2008
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification pursuant to U.S.C. section 1350
Certification pursuant to U.S.C. section 1350


12


PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
     
ITEM 1.BUSINESS
GENERAL
AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (the Company) is a bank holding company organized under the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law. The Company became a holding company upon acquiring all of the outstanding shares of AmeriServ Financial Bank (the Bank) on January 5, 1983. The Company’s other wholly owned subsidiaries include AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company (the Trust Company) formed in October 1992, and AmeriServ Life Insurance Company (AmeriServ Life) formed in October 1987.
     
The Company’s principal activities consist of owning and operating its three wholly owned subsidiary entities. At December 31, 2007,2008, the Company had, on a consolidated basis, total assets, deposits, and shareholders’ equity of $905$967 million, $710$695 million and $90$113 million, respectively. The Company and its subsidiaries derive substantially all of their income from banking and bank-related services. The Company functions primarily as a coordinating and servicing unit for its subsidiary entities in general management, accounting and taxes, loan review, auditing, investment accounting, marketing and insurance risk management.
     
As previously stated, the Company is a bank holding company and is subject to supervision and regular examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking. The Company is also under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for matters relating to offering and sale of its securities. The Company is subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as administered by the SEC. The Company is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the trading symbol “ASRV,” and is subject to the rules of NASDAQ for listed companies.
AMERISERV FINANCIAL BANKING SUBSIDIARY
     
AmeriServ Financial Bank
     
The Bank is a state bank chartered under the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965, as amended. Through 1918 locations in Allegheny, Cambria, Centre, Somerset, and Westmoreland Counties, Pennsylvania, AmeriServ Financial Bank conducts a general banking business. It is a full-service bank offering (i) retail banking services, such as demand, savings and time deposits, money market accounts, secured and unsecured loans, mortgage loans, safe deposit boxes, holiday club accounts, collection services, money orders, and traveler’s checks; (ii) lending, depository and related financial services to commercial, industrial, financial, and governmental customers, such as real estate-mortgage loans, short- and medium-term loans, revolving credit arrangements, lines of credit, inventory and accounts receivable financing, real estate-construction loans, business savings accounts, certificates of deposit, wire transfers, night depository, and lock box services. The Bank also operates 2221 automated bank teller machines (ATMs) through its24-Hour Banking Network that is linked with NYCE, a regional ATM network and CIRRUS, a national ATM network.
On March 7, 2007, the Bank completed the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA). WCCA is a registered investment advisor with expertise in large cap stocks and as of December 31, 20072008 had $137$82 million in assets under management. The Bank had a wholly owned mortgage banking subsidiary — Standard Mortgage Corporation of Georgia (SMC). SMC was a residential mortgage loan servicer based in Atlanta, GA. The Company concluded that mortgage servicing was not a core community banking business and it did not have the scale nor the earnings power to absorb the volatility and risk associated with this business line. On December 28, 2004, the Company sold all of its remaining mortgage servicing rights and discontinued operations of this non-core business in 2005. Additionally, AmeriServ Financial Services Corporation was formed on May 23, 1997 and engages in the sale of annuities, mutual funds, and insurance. On December 31, 2004, the Company merged AmeriServ Financial Services Corporation into the Bank.
     
The Bank’s deposit base is such that loss of one depositor or a related group of depositors would not have a materially adverse effect on its business. In addition, the loan portfolio is also diversified so that one industry or


2


group of related industries does not comprise a material portion of the loan portfolio. The Bank’s business is not seasonal nor does it have any risks attendant to foreign sources.
     
The Bank is subject to supervision and regular examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking. See Note 22, Regulatory Matters, for a discussion of the Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) which the Company and its Board of Directors entered into with its primary regulators in February 2003 and which was terminated in February 2006. Various federal and state laws and regulations govern many aspects of its banking operations. The following is a summary of key data (dollars in thousands) and ratios at December 31, 2007:2008:
     
Headquarters Johnstown, PA 
Chartered  1933 
Total Assets $937,050 
Total Investment Securities  131,893 
Total Loans (net of unearned income)  707,108 
Total Deposits  695,156 
Total Net Income  5,322 
Asset Leverage Ratio  9.30%
Return on Average Assets  0.60 
Return on Average Equity  5.69 
Total Full-time Equivalent Employees  286 
     
Headquarters
 Johnstown, PA 
 
Chartered  1933 
Total Assets $894,193 
Total Investment Securities  156,248 
Total Loans (net of unearned income)  636,155 
Total Deposits  710,639 
Total Net Income  2,503 
Asset Leverage Ratio  8.84%
Return on Average Assets  0.29 
Return on Average Equity  2.78 
Total Full-time Equivalent Employees  287 

3


RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW:
     
Risk identification and management are essential elements for the successful management of the Company. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various types of risk, which includes interest rate, credit, and liquidity risk. The Company controls and monitors these risks with policies, procedures, and various levels of managerial and Board oversight.
     
Interest rate risk is the sensitivity of net interest income and the market value of financial instruments to the magnitude, direction, and frequency of changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk results from various repricing frequencies and the maturity structure of assets and liabilities. The Company uses its asset liability management policy to control and manage interest rate risk.
     
Liquidity risk represents the inability to generate cash or otherwise obtain funds at reasonable rates to satisfy commitments to borrowers, as well as, the obligations to depositors and debtholders. The Company uses its asset liability management policy and contingency funding plan to control and manage liquidity risk.
     
Credit risk represents the possibility that a customer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms. Credit risk results from extending credit to customers, purchasing securities, and entering into certain off-balance sheet loan funding commitments. The Company’s primary credit risk occurs in the loan portfolio. The Company uses its credit policy and disciplined approach to evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to control and manage credit risk. The Company’s investment policy and hedging policy strictly limit the amount of credit risk that may be assumed in the investment portfolio and through hedging activities. The following summarizes and describes the Company’s various loan categories and the underwriting standards applied to each:
     
Commercial
     
This category includes credit extensions to commercial and industrial borrowers. Business assets, including accounts receivable, inventoryand/or equipment, typically secure these credits. In appropriate instances, extensions of credit in this category are subject to collateral advance formulas. Balance sheet strength and profitability are considered when analyzing these credits, with special attention given to historical, current and prospective sources of cash flow, and the ability of the customer to sustain cash flow at acceptable levels. Our policy permits flexibility in determining acceptable debt service coverage ratios, with a minimum level of 1.1 to 1 desired. Personal guarantees are frequently required; however, as the financial strength of the borrower increases, the Company’s


3


ability to obtain personal guarantees decreases. In addition to economic risk, this category is impacted by the management ability of the borrower and industry risk, which are also considered during the underwriting process.
     
Commercial Loans Secured by Real Estate
     
This category includes various types of loans, including acquisition and construction of investment property, owner-occupied property and operating property. Maximum term, minimum cash flow coverage, leasing requirements, maximum amortization and maximum loan to value ratios are controlled by the Company’s credit policy and follow industry guidelines and norms, and regulatory limitations. Personal guarantees are normally required during the construction phase on construction credits, and are frequently obtained on mid to smaller commercial real estate loans. In addition to economic risk, this category is subject to geographic and portfolio concentration risk, which are monitored and considered in underwriting.
     
Real Estate — Mortgage
     
This category includes mortgages that are secured by residential property. Underwriting of loans within this category is pursuant to Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae underwriting guidelines, with the exception of Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) loans, which exhibit more liberal standards. The major risk in this category is that a significant downward economic trend would increase unemployment and cause payment default. The Company does not and has never engaged insub-prime residential mortgage lending.
     
Consumer
     
This category includes consumer installment loans and revolving credit plans. Underwriting is pursuant to industry norms and guidelines and is achieved through a process, which is inclusiveincludes of the Appro Credit Scoring program. The major risk in this category is a significant economic downturn.
MAJOR TYPES OF INVESTMENTS AND THE ASSOCIATED INVESTMENT POLICIES
     
The investment securities portfolio of the Company and its subsidiaries is managed to provide ample liquidity in a manner that is consistent with proper bank asset/liability management and current banking practices. The objectives of portfolio management include consideration of proper liquidity levels, interest rate and market valuation sensitivity, and profitability. The investment portfolios of

4


the Company and subsidiaries are proactively managed in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
     
The investment portfolio is primarily made up of AAA Agency Mortgage-backedrated agency mortgage-backed securities and short maturity agency securities. The purpose of this type of portfolio is to generate adequate cash flow to fund potential loan growth, as the market allows. Management strives to maintain a relatively short duration in the portfolio. All holdings must meet standards documented in the AmeriServ Financial Investment Policy.
DEPOSIT ACTIVITIES AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS, INCLUDING REPAYMENTS AND MATURITIES OF LOANS, SALES AND MATURITIES OF INVESTMENTS AND FHLB ADVANCES
Deposits
     
Deposits
The Bank has a loyal core deposit base made up of traditional commercial bank products that exhibits little fluctuation, other than Jumbo CDs, which demonstrate some seasonality. The bank also utilizes certain Trust Company specialty deposits related to the Build and Erect FundsFund as a funding source which serve as an alternative to wholesale borrowings and could exhibit some degree of volatility.
Borrowings
     
The Bank, when needed, uses both overnight borrowings and term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh for liquidity management purposes. During the past several years the Company has significantly deleveraged its balance sheet and reduced its level of borrowings through investment portfolio cash flow and security sales.


4


Loans
     
During the periods presented herein, the Company has moderately grown its loan portfolio with no adverse effect on liquidity. The Company believes it will be able to fund anticipated loan growth generally from investment securities portfolio cash flow and deposit growth.
Secondary Market Activities
     
The Residential Lending department of the Bank continues to originateone-to-four family mortgage loans for both outside investors in the secondary market and for the AmeriServ portfolio. Mortgages sold on the secondary market are sold to investors on a “flow” basis: Mortgages are priced and delivered on a “best efforts” pricing, with servicing released to the investor. Freddie Mac guidelines are used in underwriting all mortgages with the exception of CRA loans. The mortgages with longer terms such as20-year,30-year, 20-year, 30-year, FHA, and VA loans are usually sold. The remaining production of the department includes Adjustable Rate Mortgages,10-year,15-year,construction, adjustable rate mortgages, 10-year, 15-year, and bi-weekly mortgages. These loans are usually kept in the AmeriServ portfolio.portfolio although during periods of low interest rates 15-year loans are typically sold into the secondary market.
AMERISERV FINANCIAL NON-BANKING SUBSIDIARIES
     
AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company
     
AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company is a trust company organized under Pennsylvania law in October 1992. As one of the larger providers of trust and investment management products and services between Pittsburgh and Harrisburg, AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company is committed to delivering personalized, professional service to its clients. Its staff of approximately 3941 professionals administer assets valued at approximately $1.9$1.5 billion at December 31, 2007.2008. The Trust Company has two primary business divisions, traditional trust and union collective investment funds. Traditional trust includes personal trust products and services such as personal portfolio investment management, estate planning and administration, custodial services and pre-need trusts. Also, institutional trust products and services such as 401(k) plans, defined benefit and defined contribution employee benefit plans, and individual retirement accounts are included in this division. The union collective investment funds, namely the ERECT and BUILD Funds (includes Build Fund of America and Build Fund of Indiana), are designed to invest union pension dollars in construction projects that utilize union labor. At December 31, 2007,2008, AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services had total assets of$2.9 $3.3 million and total shareholder’s equity of $2.7$3.0 million. The Trust Company is subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking.
     
The diversification of the revenue-generating divisions within the trust company is one of the primary reasons for its successful profitable growth. The specialized union collective funds have attracted several internationalnational labor unions as investors as well as many local unions from a number of states. At the end of 2007,2008, assets in these union funds totaled approximately $415$325 million. In late 2008, both BUILD Funds were in liquidation status. The Company expects this fund to be liquidated over a 3 to 5 year period given current real estate market conditions.

5


     
The Trust Investment Division focuses on producingbetter-than-average investment returns by offering an array of individually managed accounts and several asset allocation disciplines utilizing non-proprietary mutual funds. In addition, the Tactical High Yield Bond Fund, the Pathroad Funds and the Premier Equity Discipline are examples of the Investment Division’s ability to respond to the needs and expectations of our clients. The diversified array of investment options, experienced staff and good investment returns facilitate client retention and the development of new clients.
     
In 2007,2008, the Trust Company continued to be a majorsolid contributor of earnings to the corporation. Grosscorporation as its gross revenue in 2007 amounted to $6.9$7.6 million which represents an increase of $248,000 or 3.7% over 2006. The Trust Company’sand the net income contribution was $1.7 million, an increase of $135,000 or 8.7% over 2006.$1.3 million.
     
AmeriServ Life
     
AmeriServ Life is a captive insurance company organized under the laws of the State of Arizona. AmeriServ Life engages in underwriting as reinsurer of credit life and disability insurance within the Company’s market area. Operations of AmeriServ Life are conducted in each office of the Company’s banking subsidiary. AmeriServ Life is subject to supervision and regulation by the Arizona Department of Insurance, the Insurance Department of the


5


Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Federal Reserve. At December 31, 2007,2008, AmeriServ Life had total assets of$1.1 million $927,000 and total shareholder’sstockholders’ equity of $939,000.$833,000.
MONETARY POLICIES
     
MONETARY POLICIES
Commercial banks are affected by policies of various regulatory authorities including the Federal Reserve System. An important function of the Federal Reserve System is to regulate the national supply of bank credit. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the Board of Governors are: open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the federal funds rate and discount rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements on bank deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits, and may also affect interest rate charges on loans or interest paid for deposits. The monetary policies of the Board of Governors have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.
COMPETITION
     
The subsidiaries face strong competition from other commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, and several other financial or investment service institutions for business in the communities they serve. Several of these institutions are affiliated with major banking and financial institutions which are substantially larger and have greater financial resources than the subsidiary entities. As the financial services industry continues to consolidate, the scope of potential competition affecting the subsidiary entities will also increase. For most of the services that the subsidiary entities perform, there is also competition from credit unions and issuers of commercial paper and money market funds. Such institutions, as well as brokerage houses, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, and pension trusts, are important competitors for various types of financial services. In addition, personal and corporate trust investment counseling services are offered by insurance companies, other firms, and individuals.
MARKET AREA & ECONOMY
     
Nationally, the economy demonstrated recessionary conditions as the Commerce Department stated that early indications show Gross Domestic Product fell at a 3.8% annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2008, following a 0.5% drop in the third quarter. Economic statistics reveal that the nation has been in a recession for more than a year. Overall, the economy grew at a weak 1.3% in 2008, which was the slowest expansion since the 2001 recession. The investment in financial institutions by the United States government together with other programs instituted by the United States Treasury and the Federal Reserve in 2008 has kept the economy from collapsing further, while the economic growth slowed during 2007 but remained positive at 2.2%,stimulus has not yet had a chance to work. This means additional layoffs are likely to occur. However, most recessions generally last no longer than two years. Accordingly, most economists are predicting that the least growth in five years.current recession will end by the end of 2009. Consumer spending, which accounts for more than two thirds of the economy, increased 2.9%decreased 3.5% in 2007, which was the least growth in four years. By the fourth quarter of 2007,2008 following a 3.8% drop in the third quarter, marking the worse back to back declines since quarterly records began in 1947. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy had shifted fromReserve cut its overnight funds interest rate basically to zero, set up a neutral stancehost of special lending programs and is prepared to an accommodative positionbegin buying longer-term Treasury bonds, a move that could push down some borrowing rates, in light of a weakening economic outlook and increasing downside risksfurther effort to growth.shore up the economy. Thesub-prime mortgage crisis caused housing activity and home values to decline. The troubled housing market along with rising energy and food prices began to negatively impact other sectors of the economy and increase Fed is increasingly worried about the possibility of deflation, which could make it harder for the economy slipping into a recession. Creditto recover. Tight credit markets have tightened makingmade it more difficult for households and businesses to borrow money. AsThe troubled housing market along with sharp increases to energy and food prices, particularly in the middle of 2008, negatively impacted other sectors of the economy. Labor markets were also hit hard with the unemployment rate climbing to 7.6% in January of 2009, which is its highest level since 1992. The government has enacted an economic stimulus plan that includes tax breaks, public works spending and expanded health care and unemployment benefits. Also, the Obama administration is moving forward with a result,plan to bolster the labor markets began to soften. Nationalfinancial systems which was helped during 2008 with the TARP program. Overall, national economic growth is expected to be flataverage -0.5% in the first quarter of 2008 and rebound slightly averaging 2% for the remainder of the year.2009.

6


     
The economy in Cambria and Somerset Counties while growing slowly, hadin December 2008 produced seasonally adjusted unemployment rates of 5.3%7.9% and 5.5%7.8%, respectively, at December 31, 2007, as compared to national and state rates of 4.9%7.2% and 4.3%.6.7%, respectively. Local markets have shown improvement as jobsbeen negatively impacted by the recessionary conditions that exist in the area have increasednational economy causing the unemployment rate to declineincrease from last year’s numberaverage of 5.7%5.4%. Johnstown, PA, where AmeriServ Financial, Inc is headquartered, is a national leader in technology ranked 45th in the nation for technology growth by the Milken Institute, the 4th best city in the eastern US byMoney Magazineand was designated as the most affordable city in the nation byForbes Magazine.The local economy did suffer a set back duringJohnstown’s cost of living is approximately 30% lower than the summernational average. As of December 31, 2008, total nonfarm jobs in the Johnstown MSA were 1,700 below the December 2007 level, which represents the largest year over year decline since January 2002, with the announced layoff of 200 workers at a local freight car manufacturer.losses coming from both goods-producing and service-providing industries. However, the beginningopening of construction on a planned technology park, and greater work on defense projects and the recent announcement of several retail and restaurant openings areis expected to contribute to economic expansion. Overall, local economic conditionsgrowth in 2008 are expected to remain positive.the future. Local loan demand remains good, in the commercial sector, but has slowed in the consumer sector.
     
Economic conditions are stronger in the State College, market.PA market, but have also been negatively impacted by the struggling national economy. The unemployment rate for the State College MSA reached 5.1% in December 2008, which is 3.4% and one ofthe highest level since June 1992, but remains the lowest of all regions in the Commonwealth. Seasonally adjusted total nonfarm jobs for the MSA dropped by 1,100 since December 2007, representing the largest year over year loss since May 2005. The Company plans to open a third branch office in the State College market during 2009 as this area presents the Company with a more vibrant economic market and a much different demographic. A large percentage of the population in State College falls into the 18 to 34 year old age group, while potential customers in the Cambria/Somerset markets tend to be over 50 years


6


of age. Overall, opportunities in the State College market are quite different and challenging, providing a promising source of business to profitably grow the Company.
EMPLOYEES
     
The Company employed 385379 people as of December 31, 2007,2008, in full- and part-time positions. Approximately 221217 non-supervisory employees of the Bank are represented by the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local Union2635-06. 2635-06/2635-07. The Bank’s current labor contract with the Steelworkers Local will expire on October 15, 2009. The Bank has not experienced a work stoppage since 1979. The Bank is one of 13 union-represented banks nationwide.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT
     
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (the “FDICIA”), among other things, identifies five capital categories for insured depository institutions: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. It requires U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies to implement systems for “prompt corrective action” for insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements based on these categories. The FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations, management and capital distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified. Unless a bank is well capitalized, it is subject to restrictions on its ability to offer brokered deposits and on other aspects of its operations. The FDICIA generally prohibits a bank from paying any dividend or making any capital distribution or paying any management fee to its holding company if the bank would thereafter be undercapitalized. An undercapitalized bank must develop a capital restoration plan, and its parent holding company must guarantee the bank’s compliance with the plan up to the lesser of 5% of the bank’s assets at the time it became undercapitalized and the amount needed to comply with the plan.
     
As of December 31, 2007,2008, the Company believes that its bank subsidiary was well capitalized, based on the prompt corrective action guidelines described above. A bank’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying the prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the bank’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.
TEMPORARY LIQUIDITY GUARANTEE PROGRAM
     On November 21, 2008, the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a final rule relating to the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). The TLGP was announced by the FDIC on October 14, 2008, preceded by the determination of systemic risk by the Secretary of the Department of Treasury, as an initiative to counter the system-wide crisis in the nation’s financial sector. Under the TLGP the FDIC will (1)guarantee, through the earlier of maturity or June 30, 2012, certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued by participating institutions on or after October 14, 2008, and before June 30, 2009 and (2)provide full FDIC deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, Negotiable Order of Withdraw (NOW) accounts paying less than 0.5% interest per annum and Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts held at participating FDIC-insured institutions through December 31, 2009. Coverage under the TLGP was available for the first 30 days without charge. The fee assessment for coverage of senior unsecured debt ranges from 50 basis points to 100 basis points per annum, depending on the initial maturity of the debt. The fee assessment for deposit insurance coverage is 10 basis points per quarter on amounts in covered accounts exceeding $250,000. As of December 31, 2008, the Company elected to participate in both guarantee programs.

7


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 contains important requirements for public companies in the area of financial disclosure and corporate governance. In accordance with section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley act, written certifications by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required. These certifications attest that the Company’s quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. In response to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company adopted a series of procedures to further strengthen its corporate governance practices. The Company also requires signed certifications from managers who are responsible for internal controls throughout the Company as to the integrity of the information they prepare. These procedures supplement the Company’s Code of Conduct Policy and other procedures that were previously in place. In 2005, the Company implemented a program designed to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This program included the identification of key processes and accounts, documentation of the design of control effectiveness over process and entity level controls, and testing of the effectiveness of key controls.
PRIVACY PROVISIONS OF GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT
     
Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act), federal banking regulators adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about customers to non-affiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to non-affiliated third parties. The privacy provision of the GLB Act affects how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors. The Company believes it is in compliance with the various provisions of the GLB Act.


7


CHECK CLEARING FOR THE 21ST CENTURYUSA PATRIOT ACT OF 2001
     
A major focus of governmental policy on financial institutions in recent years has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The Check ClearingUSA Patriot Act substantially broadened the scope of United States anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing significant new compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The United States Treasury Department has issued and, in some cases, proposed a number of regulations that apply various requirements of the USA Patriot Act to financial institutions. These regulations impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identity of their customers. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations, could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the 21st Century Act, also known as Check 21, which became effective on October 28, 2004, altered the way banks process checks. Check 21 facilitates check truncation, eliminating the original paper check from the clearing process. Instead, many checks are processed electronically. Under Check 21, as a bank processes a check, funds from the check writer’s account are transferred to the check depositor’s account, and an electronic image of the check, a processable printout known as a substitute check or Image Replacement Document (IRD), is considered the legal equivalent of the original check. Banks can choose to send substitute checks as electronic files to be printedon-site or in close proximity to the paying bank. For financial institutions and their clients, these changes have the potential to reduce costs, improve efficiency in check collections and accelerate funds availability, while alleviating dependence on the national transportation system.Company.
STATISTICAL DISCLOSURES FOR BANK HOLDING COMPANIES
   
The following Guide 3 information is included in thisForm 10-K as listed below:
I.Distribution of Assets, Liabilities, and Stockholders’ Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differential Information. Information required by this section is presented on pages 21-24, and 30-32.
I. Distribution of Assets, Liabilities, and Stockholders’ Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differential Information. Information required by this section is presented on pages22-24, and33-35.
II.Investment Portfolio Information required by this section is presented on pages 10 and 46-49.
III.Loan Portfolio Information required by this section appears on pages 10-11 and 25-27.
IV.Summary of Loan Loss Experience Information required by this section is presented on pages 26-27.
V.Deposits Information required by this section follows on pages 11-12.
VI.Return on Equity and Assets Information required by this section is presented on page 20.
VII.Short-Term Borrowings Information required by this section is presented on page 12.

8


INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
     
II. Investment Portfolio Information required by this section is presented on pages 8-9 and52-56.
III. Loan Portfolio Information required by this section appears on pages9-10 and26-27.
IV. Summary of Loan Loss Experience Information required by this section is presented on pages27-29.
V. Deposits Information required by this section follows on page 11.
VI. Return on Equity and Assets Information required by this section is presented on page 20.
VII. Short-Term Borrowings Information required by this section is presented on page 12.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
Investment securities classified as held to maturity are carried at amortized cost while investment securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair market value. The following table sets forth the cost basis and fair market value of the Company’s investment portfolio as of the periods indicated:
     
Investment securities available for sale at:
                        
 At December 31,  AT DECEMBER 31, 
Cost Basis:
 2007 2006 2005 
 (In thousands)  2008 2007 2006 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
COST BASIS:
 
U.S. Treasury $6,006  $6,011  $5,021  $ $6,006 $6,011 
U.S. Agency  38,041   57,636   59,335  10,387 37,255 57,636 
Mortgage-backed securities  98,484   113,460   131,981  114,380 98,484 113,460 
Equity investment in Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Stock*        6,988 
Other securities  3,598   3,362   4,499  24 25 42 
              
Total cost basis of investment securities available for sale $146,129  $180,469  $207,824  $124,791 $141,770 $177,149 
              
Total fair value of investment securities available for sale $144,941  $175,543  $201,569  $126,781 $140,582 $172,223 
              
     
*On January 1, 2006, the equity investments in Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Stocks were reclassified to Regulatory Stock within the other assets section of the Balance Sheet.


8


Investment securities held to maturity at:
             
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
COST BASIS:
            
U.S. Treasury $3,082  $3,153  $3,220 
U.S. Agency     3,473   3,471 
Mortgage-backed securities  9,562   6,157   7,216 
Other securities  3,250   5,750   6,750 
          
Total cost basis of investment securities held to maturity $15,894  $18,533  $20,657 
          
Total fair value of investment securities held to maturity $16,323  $18,378  $20,460 
          
             
  At December 31, 
Cost Basis:
 2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
U.S. Treasury $3,153  $3,220  $3,285 
U.S. Agency  3,473   3,471   11,484 
Mortgage-backed securities  6,157   7,216   8,836 
Other securities  5,750   6,750   6,750 
             
Total cost basis of investment securities held to maturity $18,533  $20,657  $30,355 
             
Total fair value of investment securities held to maturity $18,378  $20,460  $30,206 
             
LOAN PORTFOLIO
     
LOAN PORTFOLIO
The loan portfolio of the Company consisted of the following:
                     
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Commercial $110,197  $118,936  $91,746  $80,629  $72,011 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  353,870   285,115   269,781   249,204   225,661 
Real estate-mortgage(1)  218,928   214,839   209,728   201,111   201,406 
Consumer  23,804   16,676   18,336   20,391   23,285 
                
Loans  706,799   635,566   589,591   551,335   522,363 
Less: Unearned income  691   471   514   831   1,634 
                
Loans, net of unearned income $706,108  $635,095  $589,077  $550,504  $520,729 
                
                     
  At December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003 
  (In thousands) 
 
Commercial $118,936  $91,746  $80,629  $72,011  $75,738 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  285,115   269,781   249,204   225,661   206,204 
Real estate-mortgage(1)  214,839   209,728   201,111   201,406   194,605 
Consumer  16,676   18,336   20,391   23,285   28,343 
                     
Loans  635,566   589,591   551,335   522,363   504,890 
Less: Unearned income  471   514   831   1,634   2,926 
                     
Loans, net of unearned income $635,095  $589,077  $550,504  $520,729  $501,964 
                     
 
(1)For each of the periods presented beginning with December 31, 2007,2008, real estate-construction loans constituted 6.2%, 5.5%, 4.4%, 5.5%, and 6.3% and 3.2% of the Company’s total loans, net of unearned income, respectively.


9


NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
     
The following table presents information concerning non-performing assets:
                    
 At December 31,                     
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003  AT DECEMBER 31, 
 (In thousands, except percentages)  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 
Non-accrual loans
                     
Commercial $3,553  $494  $2,315  $802  $3,282  $1,128 $3,553 $494 $2,315 $802 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  225   195   318   606   5,262  484 225 195 318 606 
Real estate-mortgage  875   1,050   1,070   2,049   1,495  1,313 875 1,050 1,070 2,049 
Consumer  585   547   446   412   742  452 585 547 446 412 
                      
Total  5,238   2,286   4,149   3,869   10,781  3,377 5,238 2,286 4,149 3,869 
                      
 
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing
                     
Commercial              58 
Commercial loans secured by real estate              10 
Consumer     3   31      30    3 31  
                      
Total     3   31      98    3 31  
           
            
Other real estate owned
                     
Commercial loans secured by real estate              255  701     
Real estate-mortgage  42   3   130   15   248  494 42 3 130 15 
Consumer        5   10   29     5 10 
                      
Total  42   3   135   25   532  1,195 42 3 135 25 
                      
 
Total non-performing assets
 $4,572 $5,280 $2,292 $4,315 $3,894 
           
Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned  0.65%  0.83%  0.39%  0.78%  0.75%
Total restructured loans $1,360 $1,217 $1,302 $258 $5,685 
     
                     
Total non-performing assets
 $5,280  $2,292  $4,315  $3,894  $11,411 
                     
Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned  0.83%  0.39%  0.78%  0.75%  2.26%
Total restructured loans (included in non-accrual loans above) $1,217  $1,302  $258  $5,685  $698 
The Company is unaware of any additional loans which are required to either be charged-off or added to the non-performing asset totals disclosed above. Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of 1) fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or 2) carrying cost.
     
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (ii) the amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans, and (iii) the net reduction in interest income attributable to such loans.
                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Interest income due in accordance with original terms $198  $215  $214  $213  $469 
Interest income recorded     (24)  (55)  (12)  (19)
                
Net reduction in interest income $198  $191  $159  $201  $450 
                
                     
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003 
  (In thousands) 
 
Interest income due in accordance with original terms $215  $214  $213  $469  $670 
Interest income recorded  (24)  (55)  (12)  (19)  (119)
                     
Net reduction in interest income $191  $159  $201  $450  $551 
                     


10


DEPOSITS
     
The following table sets forth the average balance of the Company’s deposits and average rates paid thereon for the past three calendar years:
                         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES)     
Demand:                        
Non-interest bearing $110,601   % $105,306   % $104,266   %
Interest bearing  64,683   1.01   67,132   1.76   57,817   1.05 
Savings  70,255   0.76   71,922   0.76   81,964   0.78 
Money market  107,843   2.24   158,947   3.80   172,029   3.34 
Other time  341,185   3.54   346,134   4.34   319,220   3.83 
                      
Total deposits $694,567   2.69  $749,441   3.54  $735,296   3.05 
                      
                         
  At December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
 
Demand:                        
Non-interest bearing $105,306   % $104,266   % $107,018   %
Interest bearing  67,132   1.76   57,817   1.05   54,695   0.41 
Savings  71,922   0.76   81,964   0.78   96,819   0.86 
Money market  158,947   3.80   172,029   3.34   156,932   2.07 
Other time  346,134   4.34   319,220   3.83   284,951   3.04 
                         
Total deposits $749,441   3.54  $735,296   3.05  $700,415   2.18 
                         

10


     
Interest expense on deposits consisted of the following:
            
 Year Ended December 31,             
 2007 2006 2005  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
 (In thousands)  2008 2007 2006 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
Interest bearing demand $1,184  $606  $227  $653 $1,184 $606 
Savings  549   644   829  535 549 644 
Money market  6,040   5,743   3,256  2,417 6,040 5,743 
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more  1,774   1,894   1,378  1,744 1,774 1,894 
Other time  13,264   10,345   7,295  10,331 13,264 10,345 
              
Total interest expense $22,811  $19,232  $12,985  $15,680 $22,811 $19,232 
              
     
Additionally, the following table provides more detailed maturity information regarding certificates of deposit issued in denominations of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 20072008:
     
MATURING IN:
     
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Three months or less $11,813 
Over three through six months  13,382 
Over six through twelve months  3,565 
Over twelve months  7,406 
    
Total $36,166 
    
     
  (In thousands) 
 
Three months or less $14,354 
Over three through six months  15,270 
Over six through twelve months  7,895 
Over twelve months  3,871 
     
Total $41,390 
     


11


FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND OTHER SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
     
The outstanding balances and related information for federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
  FEDERAL OTHER
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $119,920 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end  5,685   138,855 
Average balance during year  20   71,617 
Average rate paid for the year  3.16%  1.96%
Interest rate on year end balance     0.60 
        
 At December 31, 2007 
 Federal
 Other
         
 Funds
 Short-Term
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2007
 Purchased Borrowings  FEDERAL OTHER
 (In thousands,
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
 except rates)  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $72,210  $ $72,210 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end  3,430   74,095  3,430 74,095 
Average balance during year  99   19,745  99 19,745 
Average rate paid for the year  5.18%  4.89%  5.18%  4.89%
Interest rate on year end balance     3.88   3.88 
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2006
  FEDERAL OTHER
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $49,091 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end     61,728 
Average balance during year  43   32,778 
Average rate paid for the year  5.69%  5.10%
Interest rate on year end balance     5.48 
     
         
  At December 31, 2006 
  Federal
  Other
 
  Funds
  Short-Term
 
  Purchased  Borrowings 
  (In thousands,
 
  except rates) 
 
Balance $  $49,091 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end     61,728 
Average balance during year  43   32,778 
Average rate paid for the year  5.69%  5.10%
Interest rate on year end balance     5.48 
         
  At December 31, 2005 
  Federal
  Other
 
  Funds
  Short-Term
 
  Purchased  Borrowings 
  (In thousands,
 
  except rates) 
 
Balance $  $63,184 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end     150,552 
Average balance during year  1   78,151 
Average rate paid for the year  4.94%  3.32%
Interest rate on year end balance     4.25 
Average amounts outstanding during the year represent daily averages. Average interest rates represent interest expense divided by the related average balances.
     
These borrowing transactions can range from overnight to one year in maturity. The average maturity was two days at the end of 2008 and 2007 and three days at the end of 2006 and 2005.2006.

11


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
     
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before investing in our common stock. The risks described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may impair our business. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In assessing these risks, you should also refer to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in thisForm 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Other corporate information is available at www.AmeriServFinancial.com


12


Failure to successfully execute our turnaround strategy would adversely affect future earnings.
     
At the end of 2003, we adopted a turnaround strategy that consisted of three distinct elements. These were:
  In 2003, stabilizing AmeriServ and taking immediate steps to eliminate or minimize those risk elements that posed a threat to our survival;
 
  In 2004 and 2005, initiatingexecuting steps to eliminate the key structural impediments to sustainable, improved earnings; and
 
  Articulating and executing, over the long-term, a strategy centered on community banking and continued expansion of our successful trust business that is intended to produce consistent future earnings.
     
We believe we accomplished the first two elements of the turnaround strategy. With our earnings growth in 2007 and 2008, we achieved some successmeaningful progress towards the third element of the turnaround. However, this final element of the turnaround requires sustained execution of our business plan to drive our financial performance closer to peer bank levels. If we are unable to achieve the last element of the turnaround strategy, our financial condition and results of operations will not dramatically improve and may deteriorate.
Weak loan growth may hinder our ability to improve earnings performance.
In order to improve our financial performance, we must increase our average balance of quality loans. However, our market area is characterized by an aging and declining population base and comparatively slow economic growth. Despite these unattractive fundamentals, our market also is highly competitive. Unless loan originations increase, our earnings performance may not improve to the degree we have planned.
We have unionized employees, which increases our costs and may deter any acquisition proposal.
The Bank is party to a collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America, which represents approximately 61% of our employees. In 2007, our current contract was extended until October 15, 2009. Terms of the contract extension remain the same as the prior contract with the exception of a 2.0% wage increase in the first year, and a 2.5% increase in the second year. As a result of provisions in the contract, generally known as work rules, we sometimes cannot take steps that would reduce our operating costs. Furthermore, to our knowledge, we are one of only 13 unionized banking institutions in the United States. The banking industry is a consolidating industry in which acquisitions are frequent. However, some banking institutions may be reluctant to buy a unionized bank because of a perception that operating costs may be higher or that it could result in unionization of its work force. Additionally, there is the risk of a work stoppage if a new collective bargaining agreement cannot be negotiated before the end of the current agreement. Therefore, our stock price may be adversely affected because investors may conclude that there is a reduced likelihood that we will be acquired or could be an acquiror.
A meaningful portion of our trust business is dependent on a union client base.
In an effort to capitalize on the Bank’s union affiliation, our Trust Company operates the ERECT Funds and the BUILD Funds that seek to attract investment from union pension funds. These funds then use the investments to make loansand/or equity investments on construction projects that use union labor. At December 31, 2007, approximately $415 million was invested by unions in the ERECT and BUILD Funds. This represents approximately 22.0% of the total assets under management held by the Trust Company. Therefore, the Trust Company is dependent on a discrete union client base for a meaningful portion of its assets under management and its resulting revenue and net income.
Changes in interest rates could reduce our income, cash flows and asset values.
Our income, cash flows and the value of our assets depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates we earn on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, as well as the interest rates we pay on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors which are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Changes in


13


monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence not only the interest we receive on our loans and investment securities and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but it also will affect our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits and the value of our investment portfolio. If the rate of interest we pay on our deposits and other borrowings increases more than the rate of interest we earn on our loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore our earnings, could be adversely affected. This challenge was particularly evident during periods such as 2006 and the first half of 2007 when the yield curve was flat to inverted. Our earnings also could be adversely affected if the rates on our loans and other investments fall more quickly than those on our deposits and other borrowings.
Because our operations are concentrated in Cambria and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania, we are subject to economic conditions in this area, which typically lag behind economic activity in other areas.
Our loan and deposit activities are largely based in Cambria and Somerset Counties, located in southwestern Pennsylvania. As a result, our financial performance will depend largely upon economic conditions in this area. Economic activity in this geographic market generally lags behind the economic activity in Pennsylvania and the nation. Similarly, unemployment in this market area is typically higher than the unemployment rate in Pennsylvania and the nation, although this difference has declined in recent years as our local economy has become more diversified. Adverse local economic conditions could cause us to experience a reduction in deposits, an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, all of which could adversely affect our profitability.
We are subject to lending risks.
     
There are risks inherent in making all loans. These risks include interest rate changes over the time period in which loans may be repaid and changes in the national economy or the economy of our regional market that affect the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans or the value of the collateral securing these loans.
     
At December 31, 2007, 63.5%2008, 65.6% of our net loan portfolio consisted of commercial and commercial mortgage loans, including construction loans. Commercial loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans or consumer loans. These types of loans also are typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans. Because our loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial and commercial mortgage loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans would cause a significant increase in nonperformingnon-performing loans. An increase in nonperformingnon-performing loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in our provision for loan losses and an increase in loan charge-offs.
Our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected if our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to absorb actual losses or if we are required to increase our allowance.
     
Despite our underwriting criteria, we may experience loan delinquencies and losses for reasons beyond our control, such as general economic conditions. At December 31, 2007,2008, we had nonperformingnon-performing assets equal to 0.83%0.65% of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income and other real estate owned. In order to absorb losses associated with nonperformingnon-performing assets, we maintain an allowance for loan losses based on, among other things, historical experience, an evaluation of economic conditions, and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality. Determination of the allowance inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. We may be required to increase our allowance for loan losses for any of several reasons. State and federal regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio as part of a regulatory examination, may request that we increase our allowance for loan losses. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in our allowance. In addition, if charge-offs in future periods exceed our allowance for loan losses, we will need additional increases in our allowance for loan losses. Any increases in our allowance for loan losses will result in a decrease in our net income and, possibly, our capital, and may materially affect our results of operations in the period in which the allowance is increased.
We have unionized employees, which increases our costs and may deter any acquisition proposal.
     The Bank is party to a collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America, which represents approximately 57% of our employees. In 2007, our current contract was extended until October 15, 2009. Terms of the contract extension remain the same as the prior contract with the exception of a 2.0% wage increase in the first year, and a 2.5% increase in the second year. As


1412


a result of provisions in the contract, generally known as work rules, we sometimes cannot take steps that would reduce our operating costs. Furthermore, to our knowledge, we are one of only 13 unionized banking institutions in the United States. The banking industry is a consolidating industry in which acquisitions are frequent. However, some banking institutions may be reluctant to buy a unionized bank because of a perception that operating costs may be higher or that it could result in unionization of its work force. Additionally, there is the risk of a work stoppage if a new collective bargaining agreement cannot be negotiated before the end of the current agreement. Therefore, our stock price may be adversely affected because investors may conclude that there is a reduced likelihood that we will be acquired or could be an acquiror.
Changes in interest rates could reduce our income, cash flows and asset values.
     Our income, cash flows and the value of our assets depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates we earn on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, as well as the interest rates we pay on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors which are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence not only the interest we receive on our loans and investment securities and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but it also will affect our ability to originate loans and obtain deposits and the value of our investment portfolio. If the rate of interest we pay on our deposits and other borrowings increases more than the rate of interest we earn on our loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore our earnings, could be adversely affected. Our earnings also could be adversely affected if the rates on our loans and other investments fall more quickly than those on our deposits and other borrowings.
Because our operations are concentrated in Cambria and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania, we are subject to economic conditions in this area, which typically lag behind economic activity in other areas.
     Some of our loans and the majority of our deposit activities are based in Cambria and Somerset Counties, located in southwestern Pennsylvania. As a result, our financial performance will depend largely upon economic conditions in this area. Economic activity in this geographic market generally lags behind the economic activity in Pennsylvania and the nation. Similarly, unemployment in this market area is typically higher than the unemployment rate in Pennsylvania and the nation, although this difference has declined in recent years as our local economy has become more diversified. Adverse local economic conditions could cause us to experience a reduction in deposits, an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, all of which could adversely affect our profitability.
A portion of our trust business is dependent on a union client base.
     In an effort to capitalize on the Bank’s union affiliation, our Trust Company operates the ERECT Funds and the BUILD Funds that seek to attract investment from union pension funds. These funds then use the investments to make loans and/or equity investments on construction projects that use union labor.At December 31, 2008, approximately $325 million was invested by unions in the ERECT and BUILD Funds. This represents approximately 21.2% of the total assets administered by the Trust Company. Therefore, the Trust Company is dependent on a discrete union client base for a portion of its assets under management and its resulting revenue and net income. In late 2008 both BUILD Funds were in liquidation status. The Company expects this fund to be liquidated over a 3 to 5 year period given the current real estate market conditions.
The Company may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.
     Financial service institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. The Company has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose the Company to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, the Company’s credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Company cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to the Company. Reduced wholesale funding capacity or higher borrowing costs due to capital constraints at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, would reduce the Company’s liquidity and negatively impact earnings and net interest margin. Any such losses could have a material adverse affect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success will depend on our ability to compete effectively in a highly competitive market and geographic area.
     
We face substantial competition in all phases of our operations from a variety of different competitors, including commercial banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, credit unions, consumer finance companies, factoring companies, insurance companies and money market mutual funds. There is very strong competition among financial services providers in our

13


principal service area. Due to their size, many competitors can achieve economies of scale and, as a result, may offer a broader range of products and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than we can.
     
We believe that our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including:
  Our ability to build upon existing customer relationships and market position;
 
  Competitors’ interest rates and service fees;
 
  Our ability to attract and retain a qualified workforce;
 
  The scope of our products and services;
 
  The relevance of our products and services to customer needs and demands and the rate at which we and our competitors introduce them;
 
  Satisfaction of our customers with our customer service; and
 
  Industry and general economic trends.
     
If we experience difficulty in any of these areas, our competitive position could be materially adversely affected, which will affect our growth and profitability.
     
Some of the financial services organizations with which we compete are not subject to the same degree of regulation as is imposed on federally insured financial institutions. As a result, those non-bank competitors may be able to access funding and provide various services more easily or at less cost than we can, adversely affecting our ability to compete effectively.
We may be adversely affected by government regulation.
     We are subject to extensive federal and state banking regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are intended primarily to protect our depositors’ funds and the federal deposit insurance funds, not shareholders. Regulatory requirements affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in the imposition of limitations on our operations that would adversely impact our operations and could, if capital levels drop significantly, result in our being required to cease operations. Changes in governing law, regulations or regulatory practices could impose additional costs on us or adversely affect our ability to obtain deposits or make loans and, as a consequence, our revenues and profitability.
Environmental liability associated with lending activities could result in losses.
     
In the course of our business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing our loans. If hazardous substances were discovered on any of these properties, we may be liable to governmental entities or third parties for the costs of remediation of the hazard, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Many environmental laws can impose liability regardless of whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the contamination. In addition, if we arrange for the disposal of hazardous or toxic substances at another site, we may be liable for the costs of cleaning up and removing those substances from the site, even if we neither own nor operate the disposal site. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially limit use of properties we acquire through foreclosure, reduce their value or limit our ability to sell them in the event of a default on the loans they secure. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability.
We may be adversely affected by government regulation.
We are subject to extensive federal and state banking regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are intended primarily to protect our depositors’ funds and the federal deposit insurance funds, not shareholders. Regulatory requirements affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in the imposition of limitations on our operations that would adversely impact our operations and could, if capital levels drop significantly, result in our being required to cease operations. Changes in governing law, regulations or regulatory practices could impose additional costs on us or adversely affect our ability to obtain deposits or make loans and, as a consequence, our revenues and profitability.


15


RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK
The Company’s stock price can be volatile.
     
Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. The Company’s stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:
  Actual or anticipated variations in quarterly results of operations;
 
  Operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Company;
 
  News reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry;
 
  Perceptions in the marketplace regarding the Companyand/or its competitors;
 
  New technology used, or services offered, by competitors;
 
  Changes in government regulations; and
 
  Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.

14


     
General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause the Company’s stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.
The trading volume in the Company’s common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.
     
Although the Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the NationalNASDAQ Global Market System (NASDAQ), the trading volume in its common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of the Company’s common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which the Company has no control. Given the lower trading volume of the Company’s common stock, significant sales of the Company’s common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause the Company’s stock price to fall.
An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit.
     
Our common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, commonly referred to as the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in our common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and is subject to the same market forces that affect the price of common stock in any company. As a result, if you acquire our common stock, you may lose some or all of your investment.
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
     
The Company has no unresolved staff comments from the SEC for the reporting period presented.
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
     
The principal offices of the Company and the Bank occupy the five-story AmeriServ Financial building at the corner of Main and Franklin Streets in Johnstown plus twelve floors of the building adjacent thereto. The Company occupies the main office and its subsidiary entities have 13 other locations which are owned. TenEight additional locations are leased with terms expiring from January 1, 2008September 30, 2009 to March 31, 2018.
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
     
The Company is subject to a number of asserted and unasserted potential legal claims encountered in the normal course of business. In the opinion of both management and legal counsel, there is no present basis to


16


conclude that the resolution of these claims will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
     
No matter was submitted by the Company to its shareholders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

15


PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
COMMON STOCK
     
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
COMMON STOCK
As of January 31, 2008,2009, the Company had 5,7954,201 shareholders of its common stock. AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ NationalGlobal Market System under the symbol ASRV. The following table sets forth the actual high and low closing prices and the cash dividends declared per share for the periods indicated:
             
          CASH
  PRICES DIVIDENDS
  HIGH LOW DECLARED
Year ended December 31, 2008:
            
First Quarter
 $3.30  $2.21  $0.00 
Second Quarter
  3.08   2.60   0.00 
Third Quarter
  2.98   2.37   0.00 
Fourth Quarter
  2.85   1.59   0.025 
Year ended December 31, 2007            
First Quarter $4.85  $4.52  $0.00 
Second Quarter  4.77   4.25   0.00 
Third Quarter  4.26   3.33   0.00 
Fourth Quarter  3.36   2.77   0.00 
             
        Cash
 
  Prices  Dividends
 
  High  Low  Declared 
 
Year ended December 31, 2007:
            
First Quarter
 $4.85  $4.52  $0.00 
Second Quarter
  4.77   4.25   0.00 
Third Quarter
  4.26   3.33   0.00 
Fourth Quarter
  3.36   2.77   0.00 
Year ended December 31, 2006            
First Quarter $5.00  $4.31  $0.00 
Second Quarter  5.24   4.50   0.00 
Third Quarter  4.96   4.43   0.00 
Fourth Quarter  5.00   4.25   0.00 
     As a result of the decision by the Company to accept a preferred stock investment under the U.S. Treasury’s CPP for a period of three years the Company is no longer permitted to repurchase stock or declare and pay common dividends without the consent of the U.S. Treasury.
     The following table summarizes share repurchase activity for the quarter ended December 31, 2008.
             
          Number Of
          Shares That May
  Total Number Average Price Yet Be
  Of Shares Paid Per Share Purchased
October  86,400  $2.53   656,800 
November  411,600  $2.30   245,200 
December  245,200  $2.32    
     All shares are repurchased under Board of Directors authorization. In December 2007, the Board authorized a new program to repurchase 1.1 million shares.


1716


PERFORMANCE GRAPH
     
The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “Soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Returns
Among AmeriServ Financial, Inc., NASDAQ Stock Market,
and NASDAQ Bank Stocks
     
     
The following table compares total shareholder returns for the Company over the past five years to the NASDAQ Stock Market and the NASDAQ Bank Stocks assuming a $100 investment made on December 31, 2002.2003. Each of the three measures of cumulative return assumes reinvestment of dividends. The stock performance shown on the graph above is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.
                               
   12/31/02  12/31/03  12/31/04  12/31/05  12/31/06  12/31/07
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.   $100.00   $175.40   $181.40   $153.70   $173.00   $97.20 
NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies)   100.00    150.80    164.60    168.10    185.50    205.30 
NASDAQ Bank Stocks   100.00    133.00    151.20    148.30    168.70    135.20 
                               
                                 
 
    12/31/03  12/31/04  12/31/05  12/31/06  12/31/07  12/31/08 
 AmeriServ Financial, Inc.  $100.00   $103.40   $87.60   $98.60   $55.40   $40.20  
 NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies)   100.00    109.20    111.50    123.00    136.20    81.70  
 NASDAQ Bank Stocks   100.00    113.60    111.50    126.80    101.60    79.70  
 


1817


ITEM 6.SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
SELECTED FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
                     
  AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
  (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 
SUMMARY OF INCOME STATEMENT DATA:                    
Total interest income $47,819  $49,379  $46,565  $45,865  $50,104 
Total interest expense  18,702   25,156   22,087   21,753   26,638 
                
Net interest income  29,117   24,223   24,478   24,112   23,466 
Provision for loan losses  2,925   300   (125)  (175)  1,758 
                
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  26,192   23,923   24,603   24,287   21,708 
Total non-interest income  16,424   14,707   12,841   10,209   14,012 
Total non-interest expense  35,637   34,672   34,692   49,420   50,091 
                
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  6,979   3,958   2,752   (14,924)  (14,371)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  1,470   924   420   (5,902)  (5,845)
                
Income (loss) from continuing operations  5,509   3,034   2,332   (9,022)  (8,526)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes *           (119)  (1,193)
                
Net income (loss) $5,509  $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141) $(9,719)
                
PER COMMON SHARE DATA FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:                    
Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.25  $0.14  $0.11  $(0.44) $(0.58)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  0.25   0.14   0.11   (0.44)  (0.58)
PER COMMON SHARE DATA FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS*:                    
Basic loss per share $  $  $  $(0.01) $(0.08)
Diluted loss per share           (0.01)  (0.08)
PER COMMON SHARE DATA:                    
Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.25  $0.14  $0.11  $(0.45) $(0.66)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  0.25   0.14   0.11   (0.45)  (0.66)
Cash dividends declared  0.025   0.00   0.00   0.00   0.00 
Book value at period end  4.39   4.07   3.82   3.82   4.32 
BALANCE SHEET AND OTHER DATA:                    
Total assets $966,929  $904,878  $895,992  $880,176  $1,009,232 
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  707,108   636,155   589,435   550,602   521,416 
Allowance for loan losses  8,910   7,252   8,092   9,143   9,893 
Investment securities available for sale  126,781   140,582   172,223   201,569   373,584 
Investment securities held to maturity  15,894   18,533   20,657   30,355   27,435 
Deposits  694,956   710,439   741,755   712,665   644,391 
Total borrowings  133,778   82,115   63,122   77,256   269,169 
Stockholders’ equity  113,252   90,294   84,684   84,474   85,219 
Full-time equivalent employees  353   351   369   378   406 
 
                     
  At or for the Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003 
  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 
 
SUMMARY OF INCOME STATEMENT DATA:                    
Total interest income $49,379  $46,565  $45,865  $50,104  $55,005 
Total interest expense  25,156   22,087   21,753   26,638   30,360 
                     
Net interest income  24,223   24,478   24,112   23,466   24,645 
Provision for loan losses  300   (125)  (175)  1,758   2,961 
                     
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  23,923   24,603   24,287   21,708   21,684 
Total non-interest income  14,707   12,841   10,209   14,012   16,995 
Total non-interest expense  34,672   34,692   49,420   50,091   35,902 
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  3,958   2,752   (14,924)  (14,371)  2,777 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  924   420   (5,902)  (5,845)  587 
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations  3,034   2,332   (9,022)  (8,526)  2,190 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes*        (119)  (1,193)  (1,641)
                     
Net income (loss) $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141) $(9,719) $549 
                     
PER COMMON SHARE DATA FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:                    
Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.14  $0.11  $(0.44) $(0.58) $0.16 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  0.14   0.11   (0.44)  (0.58)  0.16 
PER COMMON SHARE DATA FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS*:                    
Basic loss per share $  $  $(0.01) $(0.08) $(0.12)
Diluted loss per share        (0.01)  (0.08)  (0.12)
PER COMMON SHARE DATA:                    
Basic earnings (loss) per share $0.14  $0.11  $(0.45) $(0.66) $0.04 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  0.14   0.11   (0.45)  (0.66)  0.04 
Cash dividends declared  0.00   0.00   0.00   0.00   0.00 
Book value at period end  4.07   3.82   3.82   4.32   5.32 
BALANCE SHEET AND OTHER DATA:                    
Total assets $904,878  $895,992  $880,176  $1,009,232  $1,148,782 
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  636,155   589,435   550,602   521,416   503,387 
Allowance for loan losses  7,252   8,092   9,143   9,893   11,682 
Investment securities available for sale  144,941   175,543   201,569   373,584   524,573 
Investment securities held to maturity  18,533   20,657   30,355   27,435   28,089 
Deposits  710,439   741,755   712,665   644,391   654,597 
Total borrowings  82,115   63,122   77,256   269,169   409,064 
Stockholders’ equity  90,294   84,684   84,474   85,219   74,270 
Full-time equivalent employees  351   369   378   406   413 
*The Company sold its remaining mortgage servicing rights of Standard Mortgage Corporation, its former mortgage servicing subsidiary, in December 2004 and incurred discontinued operations activity of this non-core business in 2005 (see Note 23).2005.


1918


                    
 At or for the Year Ended December 31,                 
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003  AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS:                       
Return on average total equity  3.51%  2.74%  (10.77)%  (11.44)%  0.71%  5.93%  3.51%  2.74%  (10.77)%  (11.44)%
Return on average assets  0.34   0.27   (0.95)  (0.76)  0.05  0.62 0.34 0.27  (0.95)  (0.76)
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, as a percent of deposits, at period end  89.54   79.46   77.26   80.92   76.90  101.75 89.54 79.46 77.26 80.92 
Ratio of average total equity to average assets  9.79   9.73   8.80   6.67   6.67  10.40 9.79 9.73 8.80 6.67 
Common stock cash dividends as a percent of net income applicable to common stock 9.92     
Interest rate spread  2.54   2.67   2.39   2.01   2.02  3.21 2.54 2.67 2.39 2.01 
Net interest margin  3.06   3.12   2.76   2.28   2.31  3.64 3.06 3.12 2.76 2.28 
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, at period end  1.14   1.37   1.66   1.90   2.32  1.26 1.14 1.37 1.66 1.90 
Non-performing assets as a percentage of loans, loans held for sale and other real estate owned, at period end  0.83   0.39   0.78   0.75   2.26  0.65 0.83 0.39 0.78 0.75 
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and loans held for sale  0.19   0.16   0.11   0.68   0.22  0.20 0.19 0.16 0.11 0.68 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends:(1)                       
Excluding interest on deposits  2.60X  1.93X  (1.35)X  0.12X  1.15x 3.17X 2.60X 1.93X (1.35)X 0.12X
Including interest on deposits  1.16   1.12   0.05   0.46   1.09  1.37 1.16 1.12 0.05 0.46 
Cumulative one year interest rate sensitivity gap ratio, at period end  0.90   0.85   0.89   0.78   0.96  1.10 0.90 0.85 0.89 0.78 
 
(1)The ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends is computed by dividing the sum of income before taxes, fixed charges, and preferred dividends by the sum of fixed charges and preferred dividends. Fixed charges represent interest expense and are shown as both excluding and including interest on deposits.

19


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
     
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. including the related notes thereto, included elsewhere herein.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, AND 20052006
2008 SUMMARY OVERVIEW:
     
SUMMARY OVERVIEW:The net income of AmeriServ in the fourth quarter of 2008 exceeded net income for the same period of 2007 by 75%. This resulted from a $71 million increase in loans outstanding and a 76 basis point increase in the net interest margin. The conservative balance sheet that AmeriServ has maintained since 2005 was well positioned for the Federal Reserve program to lower interest rates. At the same time, AmeriServ had ample liquidity to respond to a number of attractive lending opportunities which increased net loans. The result was that the fourth quarter proved to be the strongest quarter recorded in 2008, with no unusual events.
     The impact of the fourth quarter on the full year was significant. Net income in 2008 totaled $5.5 million and surpassed that of 2007 by 82% as earnings per share increased from $0.14 per share in 2007 to $0.25 per share in 2008. Return on assets for the full year was 0.62% or 28 basis points above the full year 2007. These performance improvements were in spite of the decline in the equity markets which reduced the late year revenue streams of both the Trust Company and West Chester Capital Advisors
There     However, all this is not to say that 2008 was significant financial turmoila year without challenges. The stumbles in the economy caused AmeriServ to increase its loan loss provision by $2.6 million over 2007 to improve its coverage of non-performing assets to 195% (as compared with 137% at December 31, 2007). After two years of reducing expenses, in 2008 expenses increased by 2.8%. This increase was not in salaries and benefits, but chiefly in external professional expenses to gain the best guidance as we manage through these turbulent times. Overall, we believe the fourth quarter and full year results were encouraging, especially considering the well documented troubles that persist in banking and which now have spread into the national and global market placeeconomy.
     During 2007 and 2008, and now extending into 2009, we have become sadly familiar with a new set of phrases. We speak daily of sub-prime mortgages, of a credit crunch, of financial bailouts and the like. We hear leading economists and governmental experts tell us that their next recommended program will finally be the answer to the nation’s dilemma. But we have also noticed — in spite of these frequently encouraging pronouncements — the economy has continued its decline. Employment reductions have become commonplace, bankruptcy filings are disturbingly frequent and none of the hastily designed economic solutions have arrested the decline.
     Here at AmeriServ we observe these developments with an attitude of careful concern. As a company operating in the heart of the Rust Belt, we learned it is foolhardy to swim against the tide. During the period 2002 through 2005, we learned just how difficult it is to overcome mounting real world difficulties. Our positive performance during the fourth quartertroubles of 2007. Concerns2008 tells us that AmeriServ is once again a credit and liquidity crunch withinhealthy company.
     Now the challenge is to keep it healthy while the banking sectorindustry and a weak housing market impacted by risky sub prime lending practices could combinethe global economy continue to causeexperience what can only be termed as stunning losses. It was this commitment to protect the United States economyreinvented AmeriServ that caused the Board of Directors to enter a recession in 2008. Because of the actions taken earlyelect to participate in the Turnaround effort in 2003, 2004 and 2005, AmeriServ enters this periodTreasury Department Capital Purchase Program (CPP). The infusion of uncertainty with strong$21 million of new capital good asset quality, reduced operating expenses and continued improvement in net income. Additionally, AmeriServ has never made a sub prime mortgage, therefore, it has never sold a sub prime mortgage and it owns no investment securities for which the collateral is sub prime mortgages. A few of the highlights of the fourth quarter of 2007 and some comments about the yearon December 19, 2008, serves as a whole follow.
• On January 22, 2008, AmeriServ announced fourth quarter net income of $924,000 or $0.04 per share. This was a 59% increase over the $581,000 reported for the fourth quarter of 2006.
• This level of net income meant that AmeriServ — in the fourth quarter of 2007 — reported a Return on Assets of 0.41%, the highest level reported since the balance sheet restructuring in 2005.

20


• Loans Outstanding continued to grow, ending the 2007 year at $636 million. This represented solid growth of $47 million or 7.9% from the December 31, 2006 total.
• Operating Expenses declined by $69,000 from the third quarter and $20,000 for the full year creating the third consecutive year of declining expenses.
• Non-Performing Assets increased by $2.8 million over September 30, 2007. However, in early January 2008 the largest non- performing loan in the portfolio was paid off with no loss to the company, returning the coverage of the remaining non- performing assets by the Loan Loss Reserve to approximately 250%.
• The Net Interest Margin in the fourth quarter was 3.08% or 15 basis points above the fourth quarter of 2006 and demonstrated an improving trend in the second half of 2007.
These fourth quarter highlights, combined with the improvements reported in the preceding quarterssort of 2007, enabled AmeriServ“rainy day fund” to report net income for the full year of $3.0 million or $0.14 per share, an increase of $702,000 or 30.1% better than the $2.3 million or $0.11 per share reported for 2006. We believe thatprotect our shareholders should this is tangible evidence that the AmeriServ Turnaround continued in 2007 even as conditions in our industry deteriorated.recession deepen into a depression. However, it is importantalso provides a solid foundation so AmeriServ can continue to say that while we are pleased to report the continuing recovery of the franchise, we recognize that this level of earnings is still well below the level AmeriServ should be reporting. We remain committed to continue the unrelenting focus on building upon our growing strengthmake new job-creating business loans in the community, bankingthus enabling local consumers to pay their bills and trust activities which have beenfeed their families.
     In better times this additional capital can also position AmeriServ to be immediately proactive once the focus oflong promised economic recovery begins. The Board’s decision reflects our view that this additional capital further strengthens AmeriServ today — and for the Turnaround.
On January 22, 2008,future. Unfortunately, participation in the CPP forced us to suspend our recently announced common stock dividend. We requested an exception from this restriction in a detailed submission to the authorities, but our request was denied. We will continue to monitor the CPP program and file a new exception request as soon as conditions suggest an approval is possible. But for the present, as stated, we will strive to manage this 23% increase in capital to build an even stronger AmeriServ also announced a stock repurchase program with a goal to buy back up to 5% — or approximately 1.1 million — of the outstanding common shares. The Board and management believe thisthat is a positive strategy that will benefit shareholders. During 2007 the common stock prices of most banks were severely punished by investors who were concerned about the spreading turmoil in financial markets. By the end of 2007 many bank stocks, including that of AmeriServ, were selling below their stated book value. With the balance sheet restructuring activities of 2004 and 2005, AmeriServ not only reduced the size of the Company but also reduced the level of risk present on the restructured balance sheet. Concurrently, a maximum effort was effective in reducing the level of non-performing assets below that of AmeriServ’s peer banks. We believe this stock repurchase program will result in positive changes. The number of shares outstanding will be reduced with the goal of improving future earnings per share. This will also allow us to return a portion of Company capital to shareholders while maintaining conservative capital ratios.sound, rewarding, long term investment.
     
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company returned to profitability by reporting net income of $2.3 million or $0.11 per share. This compared favorably to the net loss of $9.1 million or ($0.45) per share reported for 2005. These positive 2006 earnings were generated from traditional community banking and trust activities with no complex financial transactions or unusual strategies. These earnings are an indication that the operating losses of 2002 and 2003 have ended and that the balance sheet restructuring losses of 2004 and 2005 have accomplished their stated goal — to reconstitute AmeriServ as a safe and sound community bank with a growing trust and asset management subsidiary.
Specifically when analyzing 2005, the successful completion of a $10.3 million private placement common stock offering on September 29, 2005 provided the Company with the capital to facilitate a series of transactions which were designed to significantly improve the Company’s interest rate risk position and position the Company for future increased earnings performance. These transactions and their related impact on 2005 earnings were as follows: 1) We retired all remaining $100 million of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) convertible advances that had a cost of approximately 6.0% and a 2010 maturity. The Company incurred a $6.5 million pre-tax prepayment penalty to accomplish this transaction. 2) We terminated all interest rate hedges associated with the FHLB debt. The Company incurred a pre-tax termination fee of $5.8 million to eliminate these hedges on which the Company was a net payer. 3) We sold $112 million of investment securities to provide the additional cash needed by the Bank for these FHLB debt and interest rate swap prepayments. The Company incurred a $2.5 million pre-tax loss on these investment security sales. 4) We redeemed at par $7.2 million of our high coupon trust preferred securities for which the Company incurred a $210,000 charge to write-off related unamortized issuance costs which is included within other expense. These transactions were significant factors that caused the Company to report losses in 2005.


21


However, the execution of these transactions combined with the capital provided from the successful private placement common stock offerings strengthened the Company’s balance sheet and reduced its risk profile.
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW.OVERVIEW. . .The following table summarizes some of the Company’s key profitability performance indicators for each of the past three years.

20


             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands, except per share data and ratios) 
 
Net income (loss) $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share  0.14   0.11   (0.45)
Return on average equity  3.51%  2.74%  (10.77)%
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
  PER SHARE DATA AND RATIOS)
Net income $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
Diluted earnings per share  0.25   0.14   0.11 
Return on average assets  0.62%  0.34%  0.27%
Return on average equity  5.93   3.51   2.74 
     The Company reported net income of $5.5 million or $0.25 per diluted share for 2008. This represents an increase of $2.5 million or 82% over 2007 net income of $3.0 million or $0.14 per diluted share. The Company’s return on assets improved to 0.62% in 2008 compared to 0.34% in 2007. Our conservative balance sheet positioning allowed AmeriServ Financial to report improved financial performance during a historic period of turmoil and crisis within the financial markets. The Company has no direct exposure to sub-prime mortgages, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac preferred stock, pooled trust preferred securities, or credit exposure to any of the large financial firms that have recently failed or been taken over. The growth in earnings in 2008 was driven by increased net interest income and higher non-interest revenue, which more than offset an increased provision for loan losses and higher non-interest expenses.
The Company reported net income of $3.0 million or $0.14 per diluted share for 2007. This representsrepresented an increase of $702,000 or 30.1% when compared to net income of $2.3 million or $0.11 per diluted share for the full year 2006. The increase in net income in 2007 was due to increased non-interest revenue and lower non-interest expense, which more than offset the negative impact of reduced net interest income, a higher provision for loan losses and increased income tax expense. The increase in non-interest revenue was driven by the benefit ofattributable to the West Chester Capital Advisors acquisition, which was completed in March of 2007. Also, the Company benefited from higher trust revenue and increased gains on asset sales in 2007.
     
The Company reported net income of $2.3 million or $0.11 per diluted share for 2006 compared to a net loss of $9.1 million or ($0.45) per diluted share in 2005. The Company increased earnings in 2006 by generating more revenue from traditional community banking and its trust company while reducing its non-interest expense base. This revenue improvement was evidenced by increased levels of both net interest income and non-interest income. The Company also benefited from a negative loan loss provision for the second consecutive year in 2006 due to the demonstrated sustained improvement in its asset quality. The Company’s financial performance was negatively impacted by increased income tax expense in 2006 after recording an income tax benefit in 2005 due to the large pre-tax loss realized that year from the balance sheet restructuring actions discussed earlier.
NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN.MARGIN. . . .The Company’s net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is a primary source of the Company’s earnings; it is affected by interest rate fluctuations as well as changes in the amount and mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The following table summarizes the Company’s net interest income performance for each of the past three years:
            
 Year Ended December 31,           
 2007 2006 2005  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
 (In thousands, except ratios)  2008 2007 2006
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
Interest income $49,379  $46,565  $45,865  $47,819 $49,379 $46,565 
Interest expense  25,156   22,087   21,753  18,702 25,156 22,087 
              
Net interest income  24,223   24,478   24,112  29,117 24,223 24,478 
Tax-equivalent adjustment  91   96   108 
       
Net tax-equivalent interest income $24,314  $24,574  $24,220 
       
Net interest margin  3.06%  3.12%  2.76%  3.64%  3.06%  3.12%
     2008 NET INTEREST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW... The Company’s net interest income in 2008 increased by $4.9 million or 20.2% from the prior year and the net interest margin was up by 58 basis points over the same comparative period. The Company’s balance sheet positioning allowed it to benefit from the significant Federal Reserve reductions in short-term interest rates and the return to a more traditional positively sloped yield curve. As a result of these changes, the Company’s interest expense on deposits and borrowings declined at a faster rate than the interest income on loans and investments. Additionally, an improved earning asset mix with fewer investment securities and more loans outstanding also contributed to the increased net interest income and margin in 2008. Total loans increased by $71 million or 11.1% with $43 million of the growth occurring during the fourth quarter of 2008 as we were able to extend credit to quality borrowers within the communities in which we operate. Overall, net interest income has now increased for eight consecutive quarters.
     COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME: 2008 VERSUS 2007... Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company’s total interest income for 2008 decreased by $1.6 million when compared to 2007. This decrease was due to a 27 basis point decrease in the earning asset yield to 5.96%. Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total loan portfolio decreased by 45 basis points to 6.37% and reflects the lower interest rate environment in 2008 as the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds rate by 400 basis points during 2008. The total investment securities yield, however, has increased by five basis points to 4.13%. The Company took advantage of the positively sloped yield curve in the second quarter of 2008 to position the investment portfolio for better future earnings by selling some of the lower yielding securities in the portfolio at a loss and replacing them with higher yielding securities with a modestly longer duration.
     The $8.8 million increase in the volume of average earning assets was due to a $34.3 million or 5.6% increase in average loans partially offset by a $21.6 million or 12.3% decrease in average investment securities. The loan growth was driven by increased

21


commercial real estate loans as a result of successful new business development efforts particularly in the suburban Pittsburgh market. The Company has found increased commercial lending opportunities in the Pittsburgh market in 2008 due to the retrenchment of several larger competitors as a result of the turmoil in the financial markets. The decline in investment securities was caused by the call of certain agency securities and ongoing cash flow from mortgage-backed securities. The Company has elected to utilize this cash from lower yielding securities to fund higher yielding loans in an effort to improve the Company’s earning asset yield.
     The Company’s total interest expense for 2008 decreased by $6.5 million or 25.7% when compared to 2007. This decrease in interest expense was due to a lower cost of funds. The total cost of funds for 2008 declined by 94 basis points to 2.75% and was driven down by lower short-term interest rates and a more favorable funding mix in 2008. Specifically, the costs of interest bearing deposits decreased by 85 basis points to 2.69% while the cost of short-term borrowings dropped by 293 basis points to 1.96%. Total average interest bearing deposits decreased by $60.2 million or 9.3% due almost entirely to a decline in Trust Company specialty deposits as wholesale borrowings provided the Company with a lower cost funding source than these deposits for the majority of 2008. Wholesale borrowings averaged 9.3% of total assets in 2008. Additionally, the Company’s funding mix also benefited from a $5.3 million increase in non-interest bearing demand deposits and an increase in retail money market deposits as customers have opted for short-term liquidity during this period of volatility and decline in the equity markets. With the recent increase in the Company’s loan to deposit ratio to slightly over 100%, the Company expects to more actively utilize the trust specialty deposits as a funding source in 2009 along with a more aggressive strategy to try to grow retail deposits.
2007 NET INTEREST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW. . .OVERVIEW... The Company’s 2007 net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis decreased by $260,000 or 1.1% from 2006 due to a six basis point drop in the net interest margin to 3.06%. The decline in both net interest income and net interest margin resulted from the Company’s cost of funds increasing at a faster pace than the earning asset yield, particularly during the first six months of 2007. This resulted from deposit customer preference for higher yielding certificates of deposit and money market accounts due to the inverted/flat yield curve with short-term interest rates exceeding intermediate to longer term rates during that period. This net interest margin pressure overshadowed solid loan and deposit growth within our community bank. Average loans in 2007 grew by $43 million or 7.7% while average deposits increased by $14 million or 1.9% when


22


compared to 2006. However, it is important to note that the Federal Reserve reductions in short-term interest rates that began late in the third quarter of 2007 favorably impacted the Company. On a quarterly basis, the Company’s net interest margin has shownshowed improvement throughout 2007 increasing from 2.97% in the first quarter to 3.08% in the fourth quarter. This helped to reverse a trend of four consecutive quarters of net interest income and margin contraction experienced in 2006 where the margin declined from 3.20% to a low of 2.93% in the fourth quarter. The Company believes it is well positioned for net interest income and margin expansion in 2008.
     
COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME: 2007 VERSUS 2006...Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company’s total interest income for 2007 increased by $2.8 million or 6.0% when compared to 2006. This increase was due to a 30 basis point increase in the earning asset yield to 6.23%, and was aided by an $8 million increase in average earning assets. Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total loan portfolio increased by 18 basis points to 6.82% and reflects the higher interest rate environment in place during most of 2007, which has allowed the Company to book new loans at rates moderately higher than those currently in the portfolio. The yield on the total investment securities portfolio increased by 12 basis points to 4.08% as the Company has generally elected to not replace maturing lower yielding securities. Also reduced amortization expense on the Company’s lower balance of mortgage-backed securities has favorably impacted the portfolio yield.
     
The $8 million increase in average earning assets was due to a $43 million or 7.7% increase in average loans, partially mitigated by a $38 million or 17.0% reduction in average investment securities. This loan growth was driven by increased commercial and commercial real estate loans as a result of successful new business development efforts. Note thatIn 2007 the Company has focused on growing the higher yielding and more rate sensitive commercial loans at a faster rate than the commercial real-estate loans. The decline in investment securities was caused by regularly scheduled maturities and ongoing cash flow from mortgage-backed securities. The Company has elected to utilize this cash from lower yielding investment securities to fund higher yielding loans in an effort to increase the Company’s earning asset yield.
     
The Company’s total interest expense for 2007 increased by $3.1 million or 13.9% when compared to 2006. This increase in interest expense was due to a higher cost of funds and an increase in total average interest bearing liabilities which were $4.0 million higher in 2007. The total cost of funds for 2007 increased by 43 basis points to 3.69% and was driven up by higher short-term interest rates and increased deposits when compared to 2006. Specifically, total average deposits increased by $14 million or 1.9% compared to 2006, while the cost of interest bearing deposits increased by 49 basis points to 3.54%. The increased cost of deposits reflects the higher short-term interest rate environment for the majority of 2007 as well as a customer movement of funds from lower cost savings accounts into higher yielding certificates of deposit. Average wholesale borrowings declined by $9 million in 2007 and averaged only 2.8% of total assets in 2007.
     
2006 NET INTEREST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW. . . The Company’s 2006 net interest income on atax-equivalent basis increased by $354,000 or 1.5% from 2005. This improvement reflected the benefit of an increased net interest margin which more than offset a reduced level of average earning assets. Specifically, the net interest margin increased by 36 basis points to 3.12% while average earning assets declined by $91 million or 10.4%. Both of these items reflected the benefits of the previously mentioned balance sheet restructuring where the removal of high cost debt from the Company’s balance sheet had resulted in lower levels of both borrowed funds and investment securities. Wholesale borrowings averaged only 3.9% of total assets in 2006 compared to 15.8% of total assets in 2005 while investment securities as a percentage of total assets had declined from 36.5% to 25.4% during this same period. The Company’s net interest margin and net interest income also benefited from increased loans in the earning asset mix as total loans outstanding averaged $564 million in 2006, a $39 million or 7.4% increase from 2005. This loan growth was driven by increased commercial and commercial real estate loans. Total deposits averaged $735 million in 2006, a $35 million or 5.0% increase from 2005 due primarily to increased deposits from the trust company’s operations and increased certificates of deposit as customers demonstrated a preference for this product due to higher short-term interest rates. Overall, the Company generated increased net interest income from a smaller but stronger balance sheet despite the negative impact resulting from a flat to inverted yield curve which pressured the Company’s net interest margin on a quarterly basis throughout 2006.
COMPONENT CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME:  2006 VERSUS 2005... Regarding the separate components of net interest income, the Company’s total interest income for 2006 increased by $688,000 or 1.5%


23


when compared to 2005. This increase was due to a 69 basis point increase in the earning asset yield to 5.93%, but was partially offset by a $91 million decrease in average earning assets. Within the earning asset base, the yield on the total loan portfolio increased by 39 basis points to 6.64% and reflected the higher interest rate environment in 2006 which allowed the Company to book new loans at rates higher than those in the portfolio. The yield on the total investment securities portfolio increased by 26 basis points to 3.96% due to the repricing of variable rate securities in the higher rate environment and reduced amortization expense on the Company’s lower balance of mortgage-backed securities.
The $91 million decline in average earning assets was due to a $130 million or 37% reduction in average investment securities partially mitigated by a $39 million increase in average loans. The average investment securities decline in 2006 reflects the impact of the Company’s deleveraging and balance sheet repositioning strategies which began in the second half of 2004 and continued throughout 2005. This repositioning involved selling investment securities and using the proceeds to retire borrowings. The increase in average loans reflects successful commercial loan growth as the Company was able to generate new business particularly in commercial real estate loans. This commercial loan growth led to a greater composition of loans in the earning asset mix that favorably impacted the Company’s net interest margin.
The Company’s total interest expense for 2006 increased by $334,000 or 1.5% when compared to 2005. This increase in interest expense was due to a higher cost of funds which more than offset the decline in total average interest bearing liabilities which were $87 million lower in 2006. We deleveraged our balance sheet by reducing high cost FHLB debt and trust preferred securities in the second half of 2005.
The total cost of funds for 2006 increased by 41 basis points to 3.26% and was driven up by higher short-term interest rates and increased deposits when compared to 2005. Specifically, total average deposits increased by $35 million or 5.0% compared to 2005, while the cost of interest bearing deposits increased by 87 basis points to 3.05%. The increased cost of deposits reflects the higher short-term interest rate environment as well as a customer movement of funds from lower cost savings and demand deposit accounts into higher yielding certificates of deposit.


24


The table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis setting forth (i) average assets, liabilities, and stockholders’ equity, (ii) interest income earned on interest earning assets and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iii) average yields earned on interest earning assets and average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iv) interest rate spread (the difference between the average yield earned on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing

22


liabilities), and (v) net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets). For purposes of these tables loan balances exclude non-accrual loans, but interest income recorded on non-accrual loans on a cash basis, which is deemed to be immaterial, is included in interest income. Regulatory stock is included within available for sale investment securities for this analysis. Additionally, a tax rate of approximately 34% is used to compute tax-equivalent yields.
                                 
 Year Ended December 31,                                     
 2007 2006 2005  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
   Interest
     Interest
     Interest
    2008 2007 2006 
 Average
 Income/
 Yield/
 Average
 Income/
 Yield/
 Average
 Income/
 Yield/
  INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST   
 Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate  AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ 
 (In thousands, except percentages)  BALANCE EXPENSE RATE BALANCE EXPENSE RATE BALANCE EXPENSE RATE 
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 
Interest earning assets:                                     
Loans, net of unearned income $607,507  $41,654   6.82% $564,173  $37,693   6.64% $525,401  $33,055   6.25% $641,766 $41,100  6.37% $607,507 $41,654  6.82% $564,173 $37,693  6.64%
Deposits with banks  500   20   4.00   706   23   3.26   770   6   0.78  583 13 2.23 500 20 4.00 706 23 3.26 
Federal funds sold  2,278   121   5.26   62   3   5.21           114 4 3.54 2,278 121 5.26 62 3 5.21 
Short-term investment in money market funds 7,136 140 1.96 8,857 203 2.29 5,573 188 3.37 
Investment securities:                                     
Available for sale  163,860   6,636   3.96   197,256   7,868   3.92   326,533   11,926   3.65  136,344 5,770 4.03 155,003 6,433 3.96 191,683 7,680 3.92 
Held to maturity  20,257   1,039   5.04   24,448   1,074   4.39   25,422   986   3.88  17,292 875 5.06 20,257 1,039 5.04 24,448 1,074 4.39 
                          
Total investment securities  184,117   7,675   4.08   221,704   8,942   3.96   351,955   12,912   3.70  153,636 6,645 4.13 175,260 7,472 4.08 216,131 8,754 3.96 
                          
TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS/ INTEREST INCOME  794,402   49,470   6.23   786,645   46,661   5.93   878,126   45,973   5.24  803,235 47,902 5.96 794,402 49,470 6.23 786,645 46,661 5.93 
                          
Non-interest earning assets:                                     
Cash and due from banks  17,750           18,841           21,449          16,786 17,750 18,841 
Premises and equipment  8,623           8,324           9,365          9,333 8,623 8,324 
Other assets  70,369           68,920           63,401          72,249 70,369 68,920 
Assets of discontinued operations                        1,135         
Allowance for loan losses  (7,755)          (8,750)          (9,613)          (7,837)  (7,755)  (8,750) 
              
TOTAL ASSETS $883,389          $873,980          $963,863          $893,766 $883,389 $873,980 
              
Interest bearing liabilities:                                     
Interest bearing deposits:                                     
Interest bearing demand $67,132  $1,184   1.76% $57,817  $606   1.05% $54,695  $227   0.41% $64,683 $654  1.01% $67,132 $1,184  1.76% $57,817 $606  1.05%
Savings  71,922   549   0.76   81,964   643   0.78   96,819   829   0.86  70,255 535 0.76 71,922 549 0.76 81,964 643 0.78 
Money market  158,947   6,040   3.80   172,029   5,741   3.34   156,932   3,256   2.07  107,843 2,417 2.24 158,947 6,040 3.80 172,029 5,741 3.34 
Other time  346,134   15,038   4.34   319,220   12,242   3.83   284,951   8,673   3.04  341,185 12,074 3.54 346,134 15,038 4.34 319,220 12,242 3.83 
                          
Total interest bearing deposits  644,135   22,811   3.54   631,030   19,232   3.05   593,397   12,985   2.18  583,966 15,680 2.69 644,135 22,811 3.54 631,030 19,232 3.05 
                          
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings  19,844   972   4.89   32,821   1,672   5.09   78,152   2,599   3.32  71,636 1,403 1.96 19,844 972 4.89 32,821 1,672 5.09 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  4,852   253   5.22 �� 967   63   6.45   73,924   4,510   6.10  11,725 499 4.26 4,852 253 5.22 967 63 6.45 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures  13,085   1,120   8.57   13,085   1,120   8.57   19,345   1,659   8.58  13,085 1,120 8.57 13,085 1,120 8.57 13,085 1,120 8.57 
                          
TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES/INTEREST EXPENSE  681,916   25,156   3.69   677,903   22,087   3.26   764,818   21,753   2.85  680,412 18,702 2.75 681,916 25,156 3.69 677,903 22,087 3.26 
                          
Non-interest bearing liabilities:                                     
Demand deposits  105,306           104,266           107,018          110,601 105,306 104,266 
Liabilities of discontinued operations                        379         
Other liabilities  9,703           6,765           6,780          9,816 9,703 6,765 
Stockholders’ equity  86,464           85,046           84,868          92,937 86,464 85,046 
              
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $883,389          $873,980          $963,863          $893,766 $883,389 $873,980 
              
Interest rate spread          2.54           2.67           2.39  3.21 2.54 2.67 
Net interest income/net interest margin      24,314   3.06%      24,574   3.12%      24,220   2.76% 29,200  3.64% 24,314  3.06% 24,574  3.12%
Tax-equivalent adjustment      (91)          (96)          (108)      (83)  (91)  (96) 
              
Net interest income     $24,223          $24,478          $24,112      $29,117 $24,223 $24,478 
              


2523


Net interest income may also be analyzed by segregating the volume and rate components of interest income and interest expense. The table below sets forth an analysis of volume and rate changes in net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis. For purposes of this table, changes in interest income and interest expense are allocated to volume and rate categories based upon the respective percentage changes in average balances and average rates. Changes in net interest income that could not be specifically identified as either a rate or volume change were allocated proportionately to changes in volume and changes in rate.
                                                
 2007 vs. 2006 2006 vs. 2005  2008 vs. 2007 2007 vs. 2006 
 Increase (Decrease) due to Change in: Increase (Decrease) due to Change in:  INCREASE (DECREASE) INCREASE (DECREASE) 
 Average
     Average
      DUE TO CHANGE IN: DUE TO CHANGE IN: 
 Volume Rate Total Volume Rate Total  AVERAGE AVERAGE     
 (In thousands)  VOLUME RATE TOTAL VOLUME RATE TOTAL 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
INTEREST EARNED ON:                         
Loans, net of unearned income $2,928  $1,033  $3,961  $2,513  $2,125  $4,638  $3,258 $(3,812) $(554) $2,928 $1,033 $3,961 
Deposits with banks  (14)  11   (3)     17   17  4  (11)  (7)  (14) 11  (3)
Federal funds sold  118      118   3      3   (87)  (30)  (117) 118  118 
Short-term investments in money market funds  (36)  (27)  (63) 33  (18) 15 
Investment securities:                         
Available for sale  (1,286)  79   (1,207)  (4,990)  932   (4,058)  (777) 114  (663)  (1,317) 70  (1,247)
Held to maturity  (257)  197   (60)  (36)  124   88   (169) 5  (164)  (257) 222  (35)
                          
Total investment securities  (1,543)  276   (1,267)  (5,026)  1,056   (3,970)  (946) 119  (827)  (1,574) 292  (1,282)
                          
Total interest income  1,489   1,320   2,809   (2,510)  3,198   688  2,193  (3,761)  (1,568) 1,491 1,318 2,809 
                          
INTEREST PAID ON:                         
Interest bearing demand deposits  111   467   578   13   366   379   (42)  (489)  (531) 111 467 578 
Savings deposits  (78)  (16)  (94)  (116)  (70)  (186)  (14)   (14)  (78)  (16)  (94)
Money market  (369)  668   299   337   2,148   2,485   (1,591)  (2,032)  (3,623)  (369) 668 299 
Other time deposits  1,084   1,712   2,796   1,139   2,430   3,569   (213)  (2,751)  (2,964) 1,084 1,712 2,796 
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings  (637)  (63)  (700)  (1,964)  1,037   (927) 561  (129) 432  (637)  (63)  (700)
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  199   (9)  190   (4,721)  274   (4,447) 283  (37) 246 199  (9) 190 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures           (537)  (2)  (539)
                          
Total interest expense  310   2,759   3,069   (5,849)  6,183   334   (1,016)  (5,438)  (6,454) 310 2,759 3,069 
                          
Change in net interest income $1,179  $(1,439) $(260) $3,339  $(2,985) $354  $3,209 $1,677 $4,886 $1,181 $(1,441) $(260)
                          
     
LOAN QUALITY.QUALITY. . .AmeriServ Financial’s written lending policies require underwriting, loan documentation, and credit analysis standards to be met prior to funding any loan. After the loan has been approved and funded, continued periodic credit review is required. The Company’s policy is to individually review, as circumstances warrant, each of its commercial and commercial mortgage loans to determine if a loan is impaired. At a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loan relationships with aggregate balances in excess of $250,000 within a12-month period. The Company defines classified loans as those loans rated substandard or doubtful. The Company has also identified three pools of small dollar value homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment. These separate pools are for small business loans $250,000 or less, residential mortgage loans and consumer loans. Individual loans within these pools are reviewed and removed from the pool if factors such as significant delinquency in payments of 90 days or more, bankruptcy, or other negative


26


economic concerns indicate impairment. The following table sets forth information concerning AmeriServ Financial’s loan delinquency and other non-performing assets.
             
  AT DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006
  (IN THOUSANDS,
  EXCEPT PERCENTAGES)
Total loan past due 30 to 89 days $1,195  $3,559  $2,991 
Total non-accrual loans  3,377   5,238  ��2,286 
Total non-performing assets(1)  4,572   5,280   2,292 
Loan delinquency as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  0.17%  0.56%  0.51%
Non-accrual loans as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  0.48   0.82   0.39 
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned  0.65   0.83   0.39 
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets  0.47   0.58   0.26 
             
  At December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
 
Total loan past due 30 to 89 days $3,559  $2,991  $4,361 
Total non-accrual loans  5,238   2,286   4,149 
Total non-performing assets(1)  5,280   2,292   4,315 
Loan delinquency as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  0.56%  0.51%  0.79%
Non-accrual loans as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  0.82   0.39   0.75 
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned  0.83   0.39   0.78 
 
(1)Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans that are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest and principal payments and (iii) other real estate owned.
     
Loan delinquency levels have now remained well below 1% for the past three years and reflect the improvedcontinued good loan portfolio quality. This stability resulted fromNon-performing assets have remained in a range of $2.3 million to $5.3 million for the Company’s diligent focus on improving asset quality as onepast three years and ended 2008 at

24


$4.6 million or 0.65% of total loans. The $708,000 decline since year-end 2007 reflects the core strategiessuccessful workout during the first quarter of 2008 of the Company’s turnaround. Non-performing assets totaled $5.3 million or 0.83% of total loans at December 31, 2007 which represented an increase from the approximate $2.4 millionlargest non-performing asset total at December 31, 2006. The increase during the fourth quarter of 2007 resulted primarily from the transfer of a $2.4 million commercial real-estate loan into non-accrual status. The Company is pleased to report that this non-performing loan was subsequently paid-off in January 2008 with no loss to the bank.
Overall, the Company had one loan totaling $1.2 million at December 31, 2007, that had been restructured which involved granting loan rates less than that of the market rate.
mortgage loan. While we are pleased with the sustained improvement inour asset quality, we continue to closely monitor the portfolio given the recessionary economy and the number of relatively large sized commercial and commercial real estate loans within the portfolio. As of December 31, 2007,2008, the 25 largest credits represented 31.4%29.0% of total loans outstanding.
     The Company had two loans totaling $1.4 million at December 31, 2008, that had been restructured which involved granting loan rates less than that of the market rate. Both of these loans are currently in non-accrual status and are currently not performing with the amended terms.
ALLOWANCE AND PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES.LOSSES. . . As described in more detail in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section of this MD&A, the Company uses a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline to maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio. The Company believes this is a critical accounting policy since it involves significant estimates and judgments. The allowance consists of three elements; 1) reserves established on specifically identified problem loans, 2) formula driven general reserves established for loan categories based upon historical loss experience and other qualitative factors which include delinquency and non-performing loan trends, economic trends, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies, and trends in policy, financial information, and documentation exceptions, and 3) a general risk reserve which provides adequate positioning in the event ofsupport for variance from our assessment of the previously listed qualitative factors, provides protection against credit risks resulting from other inherent risk factors contained in the bank’s loan portfolio, and recognizes the model and estimation risk associated with the specific and formula driven allowances. Note that theThe qualitative factors used in the formula driven general reserves are evaluated quarterly (and revised if necessary) by the


27


Company’s management to establish allocations which accommodate each of the listed risk factors. The following table sets forth changes in the allowance for loan losses and certain ratios for the periods ended.
                    
 Year Ended December 31,                     
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
 (In thousands, except ratios and percentages)  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS AND PERCENTAGES) 
Balance at beginning of year $8,092  $9,143  $9,893  $11,682  $10,035  $7,252 $8,092 $9,143 $9,893 $11,682 
Transfer to reserve for unfunded loan commitments           (122)  (139)      (122)
                      
Charge-offs:                     
Commercial  (934)  (769)  (214)  (1,107)  (425)  (405)  (934)  (769)  (214)  (1,107)
Commercial loans secured by real estate  (12)  (2)  (113)  (1,928)  (172)  (811)  (12)  (2)  (113)  (1,928)
Real estate-mortgage  (79)  (76)  (145)  (139)  (331)  (132)  (79)  (76)  (145)  (139)
Consumer  (307)  (397)  (403)  (867)  (645)  (365)  (307)  (397)  (403)  (867)
                      
Total charge-offs  (1,332)  (1,244)  (875)  (4,041)  (1,573)  (1,713)  (1,332)  (1,244)  (875)  (4,041)
                      
Recoveries:                     
Commercial  40   115   77   410   170  299 40 115 77 410 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  38   41   15   7   2  39 38 41 15 7 
Real estate-mortgage  12   19   52   65   63  26 12 19 52 65 
Consumer  102   143   156   134   163  82 102 143 156 134 
                      
Total recoveries  192   318   300   616   398  446 192 318 300 616 
                      
Net charge-offs  (1,140)  (926)  (575)  (3,425)  (1,175)  (1,267)  (1,140)  (926)  (575)  (3,425)
Provision for loan losses  300   (125)  (175)  1,758   2,961  2,925 300  (125)  (175) 1,758 
                      
Balance at end of year $7,252  $8,092  $9,143  $9,893  $11,682  $8,910 $7,252 $8,092 $9,143 $9,893 
                      
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income:                     
Average for the year $610,685  $567,435  $528,545  $503,742  $525,604  $644,896 $610,685 $567,435 $528,545 $503,742 
At December 31  636,155   589,435   550,602   521,416   503,387  707,108 636,155 589,435 550,602 521,416 
As a percent of average loans and loans held for sale:                     
Net charge-offs  0.19%  0.16%  0.11%  0.68%  0.22%  0.20%  0.19%  0.16%  0.11%  0.68%
Provision for loan losses  0.05   (0.02)  (0.03)  0.35   0.56  0.45 0.05  (0.02)  (0.03) 0.35 
Allowance for loan losses  1.19   1.43   1.73   1.96   2.22 
Allowance as a percent of each of the following:                     
Total loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income  1.14   1.37   1.66   1.90   2.32  1.26 1.14 1.37 1.66 1.90 
Total delinquent loans (past due 30 to 89 days)  203.77   270.54   209.65   298.79   79.82  745.61 203.77 270.54 209.65 298.79 
Total non-accrual loans  138.45   353.98   220.37   255.70   108.36  263.84 138.45 353.98 220.37 255.70 
Total non-performing assets  137.35   353.05   211.89   254.06   102.37  194.88 137.35 353.05 211.89 254.06 
Allowance as a multiple of net charge-offs  6.36x  8.74x  15.90x  2.89x  9.94x 7.03x 6.36x 8.74x 15.90x 2.89x
Total classified loans $10,839  $15,163  $20,208  $22,921  $35,135 
Total classified loans (loans rated substandard or doubtful) $13,235 $10,839 $15,163 $20,208 $22,921 
     The Company recorded a $2.9 million loan loss provision for 2008 compared to a $300,000 loan loss provision for 2007. The higher loan provision in 2008 was caused by the Company’s decision to strengthen its allowance for loan losses due to the downgrade of the rating classification of several specific performing commercial loans, uncertainties in the local and national economies and strong growth in total loans in 2008. Overall net charge-offs have trended upward over the past 4 years. Specifically, for 2008, net

25


charge-offs have amounted to $1.3 million or 0.20% of total loans compared to net charge-offs of $1.1 million or 0.19% of total loans for 2007. Overall, the allowance for loan losses provided 195% coverage of non-performing assets and was 1.26% of total loans at December 31, 2008 compared to 137% of non-performing assets and 1.14% of total loans at December 31, 2007. The Company has no direct exposure to sub-prime mortgage loans in either the loan or investment portfolios.
For 2007, the provision for loan losses amounted to $300,000 compared to a negative loan loss provision of $125,000 for 2006 and $175,000 for 2005. The Company did experience higher net charge-offs in 2007, as net charge-offs amounted to $1.1 million or 0.19% of total loans compared to net charge-offs of $926,000 or 0.16% of total loans for 2006 and net charge-offs of $575,000 or 0.11% of total loans in 2005. Note that the2006. The Company’s


28


2007 net charge-offs were materially impacted by a third quarter $875,000 complete charge-off of a commercial loan that resulted from fraud committed by the borrower. Classified loans have now declined for four consecutive years from a high point of $35.1 million at December 31, 2003 to $10.8 million at December 31, 2007. This is another metric that demonstrates the sustained improvement in asset quality that the Company has experienced.
     
Additionally, at December 31, 2007, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans amounted to 1.14% compared to 1.37% at December 31, 2006 and 1.66% at December 31, 2005. The drop in this ratio since December 31, 2005 is due to a decrease in the size of the allowance for loan loss combined with an increase in total loans. The Company’s allowance for loan loss coverage of non-performing assets amounted to 137% at December 31, 2007 compared to 353% at December 31, 2006 and 212% at December 31, 2005.
The following schedule sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among various loan categories. This allocation is determined by using the consistent quarterly procedural discipline that was previously discussed. The entire allowance for loan losses is available to absorb future loan losses in any loan category.
                                                                                
 At December 31,  AT DECEMBER 31, 
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 
   Percent of
   Percent of
   Percent of
   Percent of
   Percent of
  PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PERCENT OF PERCENT OF 
   Loans in
   Loans in
   Loans in
   Loans in
   Loans in
  LOANS IN LOANS IN LOANS IN LOANS IN LOANS IN 
   Each
   Each
   Each
   Each
   Each
  EACH EACH EACH EACH EACH 
   Category
   Category
   Category
   Category
   Category
  CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY 
 Amount to Loans Amount to Loans Amount to Loans Amount to Loans Amount to Loans  TO TO TO TO TO 
 (In thousands, except percentages)  AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS 
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 
Commercial $2,074   18.7% $2,361   15.6% $3,312   14.6% $2,173   13.8% $2,623   15.0% $2,841  15.6% $2,074  18.7% $2,361  15.6% $3,312  14.6% $2,173  13.8%
Commercial loans secured by real estate  3,632   44.8   3,546   45.8   3,644   45.3   5,519   43.2   7,120   41.0  4,467 50.0 3,632 44.8 3,546 45.8 3,644 45.3 5,519 43.2 
Real estate-mortgage  316   33.9   424   35.6   381   36.5   346   38.9   376   38.9  325 31.1 316 33.9 424 35.6 381 36.5 346 38.9 
Consumer  835   2.6   1,000   3.0   1,022   3.6   1,074   4.1   853   5.1  925 3.3 835 2.6 1,000 3.0 1,022 3.6 1,074 4.1 
Allocation to general risk  395      761      784      781      710     352  395  761  784  781  
                        
Total $7,252   100.0% $8,092   100.0% $9,143   100.0% $9,893   100.0% $11,682   100.0% $8,910  100.0% $7,252  100.0% $8,092  100.0% $9,143  100.0% $9,893  100.0%
                                          
     
Even though residential real estate-mortgage loans comprise 33.9%31.1% of the Company’s total loan portfolio, only $316,000$325,000 or 4.4%3.6% of the total allowance for loan losses is allocated against this loan category. The residential real estate-mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company’s five-year historical average of actual loan charge-offs experienced in that category and other qualitative factors. The disproportionately higher allocations for commercial loans and commercial loans secured by real estate reflect the increased credit risk associated with this type of lending, the Company’s historical loss experience in these categories, and other qualitative factors.
     
Based on the Company’s allowance for loan loss methodology and the related assessment of the inherent risk factors contained within the Company’s loan portfolio, we believe that the allowance for loan losses was adequate at December 31, 20072008 to cover losses within the Company’s loan portfolio.
     NON-INTEREST INCOME. . Non-interest income for 2008 totalled $16.4 million; an increase of $1.7 million or 11.7% from 2007. Factors contributing to this increased level of non-interest income in 2008 included:
NON-INTEREST INCOME. .
-a $1.4 million increase in revenue from bank owned life insurance (BOLI) due to increased payments of death claims in 2008.
-a $170,000 increase in gains on loans held for sale due to increased residential mortgage loan sales into the secondary market in 2008. There were $37.5 million of residential mortgage loans sold into the secondary market in 2008 compared to $26.7 million in 2007.
-a $490,000 or 19.0% increase in deposit service charges due to increased overdraft fees and greater service charge revenue that resulted from a realignment of the bank’s checking accounts to include more fee based products.
-a $195,000 decrease in investment advisory fees as a result of a drop in assets under management due to the declines experienced in the equity markets in 2008.

26


     Non-interest income for 2007 totaled $14.7 million; a $1.9 million or 14.5% increase from the 2006 performance. Factors contributing to the net increase in non-interest income in 2007 included:
 - a $974,000 increase in investment advisory fees resulting from the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors in March of 2007.
 
 - a $234,000 or 3.6% increase in trust fees due to continued successful new business development efforts. Over the past year, theThe fair market value of trust customer assets has growngrew by 5.9% to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2007.
 
 - a $202,000 increase in gains realized on residential mortgage loan sales into the secondary market in 2007. There were $26.3 million of residential mortgage loans sold into the secondary market in 2007 compared to $11.5 million in 2006.


29


 - other income increased by $377,000 in 2007 or 15.4% due in part to a $200,000 gain realized on the sale of a bank owned operations facility that was no longer being fully utilized. The Company also benefited from a $69,000 gain realized on the sale of a closed branch facility in the third quarter of 2007.
     
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE. . . Non-interest incomeexpense for 2006 totaled $12.82008 totalled $35.6 million; a $2.6 million$965,000 or 25.8%2.8% increase from the 2005 performance.2007. Factors contributing to the net increasehigher non-interest expense in non-interest income in 20062008 included:
 • -a $887,000 increase in other expense was largely caused by the non-recurrence of a favorable $400,000 recovery related to previous mortgage servicing operation that was realized in 2007 and greater marketing, other real estate owned, and telephone expenses in 2008. The higher other real estate expense was due to the Company realized $2.5 milliontaking possession of investment security lossesa commercial apartment building in 2005 in conjunction with its balance sheet restructuring. There were no investment security losses realized in 2006.the first half of 2008.
 
 - a $390,000 or 6.4%$385,000 increase in trustprofessional fees due to continued successful business development effortshigher legal costs related to the Trust Company matters, and higher consulting and other professional fees related to productivity studies in both the union and traditional trust product lines.2008.
 
 - a $190,000 increase$122,000 decrease in bank owned lifesalaries and employee benefits due primarily to lower medical insurance proceeds due largely to the paymentpremiums in 2008 as a result of a death claimswitch in 2006.carriers.
 
 - a $104,000$368,000 decrease in gains realizedequipment expense resulting from the benefits achieved on loan sales into the secondary market duemigration to weaker residential mortgage loan production in 2006. Overall, there were $5.8 million fewer loans sold into the secondary market in 2006 when compared to 2005.a new core data processing operating system and mainframe processor.
 
 • -other income declined by $204,000 in 2006 or 7.7% due to reduced revenuesa $91,000 penalty realized on the prepayment of $6 million of Federal Home Loan Bank debt. This charge resulted from AmeriServ Associates, a subsidiary that previously provided asset liability management and investment consulting services to smaller community banks, that was closed in the second quarter of 2006 because it no longer fit the Company’s strategic direction.decision to retire some higher cost advances and replace them with lower cost current market rate borrowings in order to reduce ongoing interest expense.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE. . .     Non-interest expense for 2007 totaled $34.7 million, a $20,000 decrease from the 2006 performance. Note that this2006. This overall decline in total non-interest expense occurred even after the inclusion of $820,000 of non-interest expenses from the newly acquired West Chester Capital Advisors. Factors contributing to the net decrease in non-interest expense in 2007 included:
 - salaries and employee benefits increased by $670,000 or 3.6% due primarily to $588,000 of personnel costs related to the West Chester Capital Advisors acquisition and an $85,000 curtailment charge for an early retirement program.
 
 - equipment expense decreased by $304,000 or 12.9% due to lower depreciation expense and maintenance costs.
 
 - FDIC deposit insurance expense declined by $104,000 or 54.2% due to the termination of the Memorandum of Understanding that the Company had been operating under in the first quarter of 2006.
 
 - other expenses declined by $268,000 due to a recovery on a previous mortgage loan securitizationservicing operation and our continuing focus on cost reduction and rationalization that has resulted in numerous expense reductions in categories such as software amortization, collection costs, telephone costs, and other taxes and insurance.
Non-interest expense for 2006 totaled $34.7 million, a $14.7 million or 29.8% decrease from the 2005 performance. Factors contributing to the net decrease in non-interest expense in 2006 included:
     
• the Company incurred $12.3 million in charges related to FHLB prepayment penalties and interest rate hedge termination costs in conjunction with its balance sheet restructuring in 2005. There were no such charges in 2006.
• professional fees decreased by $1.0 million or 24.4% due to lower legal costs and external audit fees. The Company also experienced a reduction in costs related to Sarbanes Oxley Section 404 compliance in 2006 as the professional costs associated with the first year implementation were higher in 2005.
• salaries and employee benefits decreased by $393,000 or 2.1% due primarily to 17 fewer full time equivalent employees (FTE) in 2006. The closure of AmeriServ Associates was responsible for a reduction of 8 of these FTE.
• miscellaneous taxes and insurance declined by $195,000 or 11.1% due largely to reduced premium costs for professional insurance coverage.


30


• other expenses declined by $433,000 as our continuing focus on cost reduction and rationalization has resulted in numerous expense reductions in categories such as collection costs, business development expenses, telephone costs, and other real estate owned expense. Also, the Company incurred a $210,000 charge to write-off unamortized issuance costs related to the redemption of trust preferred securities in 2005. There was no such charge in 2006.
INCOME TAX EXPENSEEXPENSE. . . . For the full year 2007, theThe Company recorded an income tax expense of $924,000,$1.5 million in 2008 which reflects an effective tax rate of 23.3%21.1%. This compares to $420,000 ofThe income tax expense recorded in 2007 was $924,000 or an effective tax rate of approximately 15.3% in 2006 compared23.3%. The Company was able to an income tax benefit of approximately $5.9 million for 2005. The higherrecord a lower effective tax rate in 2007 resulted from the Company’s improved profitability. As part of the 2006 tax expense, the Company did benefit from the elimination of a $100,000 income tax valuation allowance related to the deductibility of charitable contributions that management determined was no longer needed given the2008 despite an increased level of taxablepre-tax income generated bydue to greater tax-free revenue from BOLI. BOLI is the Company in 2006. The Company’s largest source of tax-free income is from bank owned life insurance which isincome. The Company’s deferred tax asset declined to $12.7 million at December 31, 2008 due to the primary reason whyongoing utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and improved market value of the effective tax rate is lower than the statutory rate in all years.AFS investment portfolio.

27


     
SEGMENT RESULTS.RESULTS. . . Retail banking’s net income contribution was $2.7 million in 2008 compared to $2.0 million in 2007 compared toand $1.2 million forin 2006. The retail banking2008 net income contribution was up from the prior yearis better than 2007 due to higherthe positive impact of increased non-interest incomerevenue in line items such as deposit service charges, bank owned life insurance, and gain on residential mortgage loan sales. Retail banking also benefited from reduced non-interest expenses due to lower non-interest expense. Thissalaries/benefits costs and reduced occupancy costs as a result of the consolidation and closing of two offices in our branch network. These items more than offset reduced net interest income and a higher provision for loan losses. These same factors were also responsible for the $704,000 improvement inRetail banking’s net income betweencontribution in 2007 was $776,000 better than 2006 also due to higher non- interest income and 2005.lower non-interest expense. The reduced net interest income in both 2006 and 2007 reflected increased deposit costs due to the negative impact that the flat to inverted yield curve had on customers shifting customers into higher cost certificates of deposit.
     
The commercial lending segment increased its profitability by generating net income ofwas $2.3 million in 2008 compared to $3.2 million in 2007 compared toand $2.6 million of net income earned in 2006. The improved performancereduced net income contribution in 20072008 was caused by increased net interest income resulting from the greater level of commercial loans outstanding. This more than offset higher non-interest expense and an increased provision for loan losses.losses due to the previously discussed strengthening of the allowance for loan losses and higher non-interest expenses. These factors more than offset an increased level of net interest income that resulted from the strong growth in commercial real-estate loans achieved in 2008. Assets within the commercial lending segment increased by $70$68 million or 16.9% during 2008 after achieving growth of 21.2% duringin 2007. When 2006 is compared to 2005, the
     The trust segment’s net income contribution was $1.3 million in 2008 compared to $1.8 million in 2007. One factor responsible for the decrease between years was less investment advisory and trust revenue as a result of fewer assets under management due to the declines experienced in the equity markets during 2008. Another factor causing the drop between years was increased by $1.2 million for this segment againnon-interest expenses due largelyin part to higher net interest income resulting from commercial loan growth. Improved asset quality also allowedlegal and professional costs incurred in conjunction with the movement of the union collective investment Build Fund into liquidation status. The Company expects this fund to releasebe liquidated over a portion of our allowance for loan losses into earnings in both 2006 and 2005.
3 to 5 year period given the current real estate market conditions. The trust segment’s net income contribution in 2007 amounted to $1.8 million, which was up $99,000 from the prior year.2006. Successful new business development and the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors caused revenues to increase at a faster pace than expenses in 2007. Between 2006 and 2005, the trust segment’s net income contribution increased by $303,000 due to increased revenue and controlled expenses. The diversification of the revenue-generating divisions within the trust segment is also one of the primary reasons for its successful profitable growth over the past several years. The specialized union collective funds are expected to continue to be a unique growth niche for the trust company. The union collective investment funds, namely the ERECT and BUILD Funds are designed to invest union pension dollars in construction projects that utilize union labor. The union funds have attracted several international labor unions as investors as well as many local unions from a number of states. The market value of these union funds totaled $415 million at December 31, 2007. Overall, since December 31, 2006, the fair market value of all trust assets combined with the West Chester Capital acquisition caused customer assets to increase by $242 million or 13.6% to $1.9totaled $1.55 billion at December 31, 2007.2008, a decrease of $329 million or 17.5% from the December 31, 2007 total of $1.88 billion.
     
The investment/parent segment reported a net loss of $783,000 in 2008 compared to losses of $3.9 million in 2007 which was greater than the net loss ofand $3.2 million realized in 2006, but significantly less than2006. The Company’s balance sheet positioning allowed it to benefit from the net loss of $12.2 million realizedsignificant Federal Reserve reductions in 2005. The lower level ofshort-term interest rates and the return to a more traditional positively sloped yield curve, which has caused net interest income in this segment in 2007 reflectsto increase. This was the negative impact ofprimary factor responsible for the inverted/flat yield curve with short-term rates exceeding intermediate to longer term rates during the first eight months of 2007. This more than offset the benefit of lower non-interest expenses. Note that thereduced net loss in 2005 was due primarily to2008. In addition, the previously discussed balance sheet restructuring actions which were executedinvestment portfolio repositioning to reduceimprove the Company’s risk profile and improve our earnings power. Specifically in 2005, these restructuring actions included $12.3 million of FHLB debt and interest rate hedge prepayment penalties and $2.6 million of losses realized on investment security sales.portfolio yield also benefitted this segment.


31


For greater discussion on the future strategic direction of the Company’s key business segments, see Forward Looking StatementStatements which begins on page 38.35.
     
BALANCE SHEET.SHEET. . . The Company’s total consolidated assets were $967 million at December 31, 2008 compared with $905 million at December 31, 2007, compared with $896 million at December 31, 2006, which represents an increase of $8.9$62 million or 1.0%6.9%. This higher level of assets resulted primarily from an increased level of loans. The Company’s loans totaled $636$707 million at December 31, 2007,2008, an increase of $47$71 million or 7.9%11.2% from year-end 20062007 due to commercial real estate loan growth. The Company’s commercial loan pipelines remain strong as we enter 2009 we expect to see continued growth in new loan fundings during the first half of 2009. Investment securities declined by $33$16 million in 2007 as investment2008 due to increased calls of agency securities and normal portfolio cash flowflow. The Company has been usedelected to eitherutilize this excess cash to fund loan growth or pay-down borrowings. Goodwillgrowth. Short-term investments in money market funds increased by $4.0 million to $13.5$16 million as a resultportion of the West Chesterrecently received proceeds from the $21 million Capital Advisors acquisition.Purchase Program have been temporarily invested in this product.
     
The Company’s deposits totaled $710totalled $695 million at December 31, 2007,2008, which was $31$15 million or 4.2%2.2% lower than December 31, 2006. This decrease was2007 due entirely to a $39 million decline in Trustcertificates of deposit. The Company specialty deposits relatedelected to use more wholesale borrowings as a funding source because they cost less than certificates of deposit during the majority of 2008. As a result, total FHLB short-term borrowings and advances increased by $52 million during 2008. The Company’s total stockholders’ equity increased by $23 million since year-end 2007 to $113 million due primarily to the Buildissuance of $21 million of preferred stock through the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program(CPP). The CPP is a voluntary program designed to provide capital to healthy, well managed financial institutions in order to increase the availability of credit to businesses and Erect Funds as wholesale borrowings provided the Company with a lower cost funding source than these deposits in the fourth quarter of 2007.individuals. The remainder of the deposit increase in capital was due to increased certificates of deposit and growth in non-interest bearing demand deposits. Total borrowed funds increased by $32 million due to the replacement of the Trust specialty deposits with lower rate short-term borrowed funds and FHLB advances. Total stockholders’ equity increased to approximately $90 million at December 31, 2007 from $85 million at December 31, 2006 due to thenet retention of all earnings after repurchasing stock and paying one common dividend in 2008. Overall, the Company has a reduced accumulated other comprehensive loss due to the improved value of the Company’s available for sale investment securities in 2007. The Company continues to bestrong capital position and is considered well capitalized for regulatory purposes with an asset leverage ratio of 12.15% at December 31, 2007 of2008 compared to 9.74%. at December 31, 2007. The Company’s book value per share at December 31, 20072008 was $4.07.$4.39 and its tangible book value per share was $3.75.
     
LIQUIDITYLIQUIDITY. . . The Bank’s liquidity position has been sufficientstrong during the last several years when the Bank was undergoing a turnaround and a return to traditional community banking. Our core retail deposit base has first remained stable and then grown throughout this period and has been adequate to fund the Bank’s operations. Cash flow from maturities, prepayments and amortization of securities that was used to reduce FHLBfund the strong net loan growth that the Company has achieved over the past several years. At the end of 2008, the Company’s loan to

28


deposit ratio for the first time exceeded 100%, and as a result we plan to focus more aggressively on raising deposits in 2008 to fund future loan growth. We do not expect to increase borrowings has not adversely affected the Bank’s liquidity. We expect that liquidity will continue to be adequate as we transform the balance sheet to one that is more loan dependent.above their current level.
     
Liquidity can also be analyzed by utilizing the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $1.0$6 million from December 31, 2006,2007, to December 31, 2007,2008, due primarily to $10.3$52 million of cash provided by financing activities and $6 million of cash provided by operating activities. This was partially offset by $9.2$52 million of cash used in investing activities. Within investing activities, proceeds fromcash provided by investment security maturities and sales exceeded cash used for limited purchases of new investment securities by $32.1$22 million. This reflectedHowever, the Company’s ongoing strategynet use of using cash from the investment portfolioin investing activities was due to fund loans.loan growth. Cash advanced for new loan fundings and purchases totaled $214$209 million and was $46$72 million morehigher than the $137 million of cash received from loan principal payments and sales. Note that both the level of new loan fundings and existing loan payoffs were sharply higher in 2007 when compared to the prior two years. Within financing activities, the Company experienced a net $31.3$17 million decline in deposits due to less utilizationreduced certificates of specialty deposits from the Trust Company.deposit. The Company largelymore than replaced these deposits with increased short-term FHLB borrowings and advances, which we chose to increase by $52 million due to more attractive funding costs.
The CPP preferred stock issuance also provided the Company used $1.0with $21 million of cash to service the dividend on the guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (trust preferred securities) in 2007 and $2.2 million of cash to acquire West Chester Capital Advisors. There was no cash used for common stock cash dividends payments to shareholders in any of the past three years.from financing activities.
     The parent company had $4.1$23 million of cash and short-term investments at December 31, 2008 compared to $4 million at December 31, 2007.
Dividend payments from subsidiaries and the settlement of the inter-company tax position also provide ongoing cash to the parent. As of January 1,December 31, 2008, the subsidiary bank had $4.6$3.9 million of cash available for dividend upstream toper the parent as the bank’s 2004 and 2005 loss years are no longer part of the dividend upstream calculation. On January 22, 2008, the Company announced a stock repurchase program with a goal to buy back up to 5% — or approximately 1.1 million — of the outstanding common shares.applicable regulatory formulas.
     
Financial institutions must maintain liquidity to meetday-to-day requirements of depositordepositors and borrower customers,borrowers, take advantage of market opportunities, and provide a cushion against unforeseen needs. Liquidity needs can be met by either reducing assets or increasing liabilities. Sources of asset liquidity are provided by short-term


32


investment securities, time deposits with banks, federal funds sold, short-term investments in money market funds, banker’s acceptances, and commercial paper. These assets totaled $42 million at December 31, 2008 and $8 million at both December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.2007. Maturing and repaying loans, as well as the monthly cash flow associated with mortgage-backed securities and security maturities are other significant sources of asset liquidity for the Company.
     
Liability liquidity can be met by attracting deposits with competitive rates, using repurchase agreements, buying federal funds, or utilizing the facilities of the Federal Reserve or the Federal Home Loan Bank systems. The Company utilizes a variety of these methods of liability liquidity. Additionally, the Company’s subsidiary bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank, which provides the opportunity to obtain short- to longer-term advances based upon the Bank’s investment in assets secured by one- to four-family residential real estate. At December 31, 2007,2008, the bank had immediately available $218$183 million of overnight borrowing capabilityavailability at the FHLB and $18$10 million of unsecured federal funds lines with correspondent banks. The Company believes it has ample liquidity available to fund outstanding loan commitments if they were fully drawn upon.
     
CAPITAL RESOURCES.RESOURCES. . . The Company exceeds all regulatory capital ratios for each of the periods presented. The Company continues to bepresented and is considered well capitalized as thecapitalized. The asset leverage ratio was 9.74%12.15% and the Tier 1 capital ratio was 14.66% at December 31, 20072008 compared to 10.54%9.74% and 12.79% at December 31, 2006. Note that the2007. The impact of other comprehensive loss is excluded from the regulatory capital ratios. At December 31, 2007,2008, accumulated other comprehensive loss amounted to $4.0$4.2 million. Additionally, the amortization of $865,000 of core deposit intangible assets has favorably impacted tangible capital. The Company’s tangible equity to assetassets ratio was 8.52%8.90% and its tangible common equity to assets ratio was 8.30% at December 31, 2007.2008. We anticipate that our strong capital ratios may decline modestly during 2008 as we expectfurther increase in 2009 due to return capital to our shareholders through the executionretention of all earnings that will be partially offset by preferred dividend requirements and growth of the stockbalance sheet.
     In January 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a repurchase program that was discussed earlier.to buyback up to 5% or approximately 1.1 million of its outstanding common shares. The Company completed this program in 2008 by repurchasing 1,098,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of $2.58. The Company also used $544,000 of cash to pay a 2.5 cent common dividend to its shareholders in the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of our decision to accept the $21 million CPP preferred stock investment, for a period of three years we are no longer permitted to repurchase stock or declare and pay common dividends without the consent of the U.S. Treasury.
     
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY.SENSITIVITY. . . Asset/liability management involves managing the risks associated with changing interest rates and the resulting impact on the Company’s net interest income, net income and capital. The management and measurement of interest rate risk at AmeriServ Financial is performed by using the following tools: 1) simulation modeling, which analyzes the impact of interest rate changes on net interest income, net income and capital levels over specific future time periods. The simulation modeling forecasts earnings under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in the absolute level of interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, prepayments and changes in the volumes and rates of various loan and deposit categories. The simulation modeling incorporates assumptions about reinvestment and the repricing characteristics of certain assets and liabilities without stated contractual maturities; 2) market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis, and 3) static GAP analysis, which analyzes the extent to which interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities are matched at specific points in time. The overall interest rate risk position and strategies are reviewed by senior management and the Company’s Board of Directors on an ongoing basis.


3329


The following table presents a summary of the Company’s static GAP positions at December 31, 2007:2008:
                     
      OVER  OVER       
      3 MONTHS  6 MONTHS       
  3 MONTHS  THROUGH  THROUGH  OVER    
  OR LESS  6 MONTHS  1 YEAR  1 YEAR  TOTAL 
INTEREST SENSITIVITY PERIOD (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS AND PERCENTAGES) 
RATE SENSITIVE ASSETS:                    
Loans and loans held for sale $225,644  $55,561  $93,070  $323,923  $698,198 
Investment securities  12,207   23,238   34,638   72,592   142,675 
Short-term assets  17,179            17,179 
Regulatory stock  7,614         2,125   9,739 
Bank owned life insurance        32,929      32,929 
                
Total rate sensitive assets $262,644  $78,799  $160,637  $398,640  $900,720 
                
RATE SENSITIVE LIABILITIES:                    
Deposits:                    
Non-interest bearing deposits $  $  $  $116,372  $116,372 
NOW  4,379         56,521   60,900 
Money market  116,667         13,025   129,692 
Other savings  17,670         53,012   70,682 
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more  11,813   13,382   3,565   7,406   36,166 
Other time deposits  104,374   25,239   35,546   115,985   281,144 
                
Total deposits  254,903   38,621   39,111   362,321   694,956 
Borrowings  119,932   12   3,029   23,890   146,863 
                
Total rate sensitive liabilities $374,835  $38,633  $42,140  $386,211  $841,819 
                
INTEREST SENSITIVITY GAP:                    
Interval  (112,191)  40,166   118,497   12,429    
Cumulative $(112,191) $(72,025) $46,472  $58,901  $58,901 
                
Period GAP ratio  0.70X  2.04X  3.81X  1.03X    
Cumulative GAP ratio  0.70   0.83   1.10   1.07     
Ratio of cumulative GAP to total assets  (11.60)%  (7.45)%  4.81%  6.09%    
     
                     
     Over
  Over
       
     3 Months
  6 Months
       
  3 Months
  through
  through
  Over
    
Interest Sensitivity Period
 or Less  6 Months  1 Year  1 Year  Total 
  (In thousands, except ratios and percentages) 
 
RATE SENSITIVE ASSETS:                    
Loans and loans held for sale $169,747  $41,332  $86,501  $331,323  $628,903 
Investment securities  13,655   15,949   32,137   101,733   163,474 
Regulatory stock  5,079         2,125   7,204 
Short-term assets  197            197 
Bank owned life insurance        32,864      32,864 
                     
Total rate sensitive assets $188,678  $57,281  $151,502  $435,181  $832,642 
                     
RATE SENSITIVE LIABILITIES:                    
Deposits:                    
Non-interest bearing deposits $  $  $  $113,380  $113,380 
NOW  9,243         53,956   63,199 
Money market  106,987         10,986   117,973 
Other savings  17,289         51,866   69,155 
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more  14,354   15,270   7,895   3,871   41,390 
Other time deposits  110,587   31,215   55,837   107,703   305,642 
                     
Total deposits  258,460   46,485   63,732   341,762   710,439 
Borrowings  72,222   12   24   22,942   95,200 
                     
Total rate sensitive liabilities $330,682  $46,497  $63,756  $364,704  $805,639 
                     
INTEREST SENSITIVITY GAP:                    
Interval  (142,004)  10,784   87,746   70,477    
Cumulative $(142,004) $(131,220) $(43,474) $27,003  $27,003 
                     
Period GAP ratio  0.57X  1.23X  2.38X  1.19X    
Cumulative GAP ratio  0.57   0.65   0.90   1.03     
Ratio of cumulative GAP to total assets  (15.69)%  (14.50)%  (4.80)%  2.98%    
When December 31, 2007,2008, is compared to December 31, 2006,2007, the ratio of the cumulative GAP to total assets up to thethrough one year time frame became less negative increasing from -7.80% to -4.80%more positive due to an anticipated increase in asset prepayment speeds. ThisWhile the Company does have a negative gap positioning suggests thatposition through six months, the Company’s net interest income should benefit from the recent reductions in short-term interest rates.absolute low level of rates makes this table more difficult to analyze since there is little room for certain liabilities to reprice downward further.
     
Management places primary emphasis on simulation modeling to manage and measure interest rate risk. The Company’s asset/liability management policy seeks to limit net interest income variability over the first twelve months of the forecast period to +/ − 7.5%-7.5%, which include, interest rate movements of 200 basis points. Additionally, the Company also uses market value sensitivity measures to further evaluate the balance sheet exposure to changes in interest rates. The Company monitors the trends in market value of portfolio equity sensitivity analysis on a quarterly basis.
     
The following table presents an analysis of the sensitivity inherent in the Company’s net interest income and market value of portfolio equity. The interest rate scenarios in the table compare the Company’s base forecast, which was prepared using a flat interest rate scenario, to scenarios that reflect immediate interest rate changes of


34


100 and 200 basis points. Note that we suspended the 200 basis point downward rate shock since it has little value due to the absolute low level of interest rates. Each rate scenario contains unique prepayment and repricing assumptions that are applied to the Company’s existing balance sheet that was developed under the flat interest rate scenario.
                
 Variability of
 Change in
  VARIABILITY OF CHANGE IN
 Net Interest
 Market Value of
  NET INTEREST MARKET VALUE OF
Interest Rate Scenario
 Income Portfolio Equity 
INTEREST RATE SCENARIO INCOME PORTFOLIO EQUITY
200 bp increase  (2.7)%  7.8%  (0.7)%  6.6%
100 bp increase  0.3   5.7  1.7 6.2 
100 bp decrease  (1.9)  (12.3)  (9.6)  (14.9)
200 bp decrease  (8.9)  (32.9)
     
The variability of net interest income is negative in the 100 basis point downward rate scenario as the Company has more exposure to assets repricing downward to a greater extent than liabilities due to the absolute low level of interest rates with the fed funds rate currently at 0.25%. There is only limited net interest income variability in the increasing interest rate scenarios. The market value of portfolio equity increases in the upward rate shocks due to improved value of the Company’s core deposit base. Negative variability of market value of portfolio equity occurred in boththe downward rate shocksshock due to a reduced value for core deposits. Overall, the Company is within its policy guidelines for the interest rate simulations.

30


     
Within the investment portfolio at December 31, 2007, 90%2008, 89% of the portfolio is classified as available for sale and 10%11% as held to maturity. The available for sale classification provides management with greater flexibility to manage the securities portfolio to better achieve overall balance sheet rate sensitivity goals and provide liquidity to fund loan growth if needed. The mark to market of the available for sale securities does inject more volatility in the book value of equity, but has no impact on regulatory capital. There are 21 securities that are temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008. The Company reviews its securities quarterly and has asserted that at December 31, 2008, the impaired value of securities represents temporary declines due to movements in interest rates and the Company does have the ability and intent to hold those securities to maturity or to allow a market recovery. Furthermore, it is the Company’s intent to manage its long-term interest rate risk by continuing to sell newly originated fixed-rate30-year mortgage loans into the secondary market. The Company also periodically sells15-year fixed rate mortgage loans into the secondary market as well. For the year 2008, 65% of all residential mortgage loan production was sold into the secondary market.
     
The amount of loans outstanding by category as of December 31, 2007,2008, which are due in (i) one year or less, (ii) more than one year through five years, and (iii) over five years, are shown in the following table. Loan balances are also categorized according to their sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
                
   More
                     
   than One
      MORE     
 One
 Year
      THAN ONE     
 Year or
 through
 Over Five
 Total
  ONE YEAR     
 Less Five Years Years Loans  YEAR OR THROUGH OVER FIVE TOTAL 
 (In thousands, except ratios)  LESS FIVE YEARS YEARS LOANS 
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS) 
Commercial $36,461  $66,550  $15,925  $118,936  $30,654 $66,319 $13,224 $110,197 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  29,967   103,524   151,624   285,115  39,622 132,074 182,174 353,870 
Real estate-mortgage  40,748   75,862   99,289   215,899  54,201 77,716 88,011 219,928 
Consumer  2,763   4,694   9,219   16,676  8,133 2,143 13,528 23,804 
                  
Total $109,939  $250,630  $276,057  $636,626  $132,610 $278,252 $296,937 $707,799 
                  
 
Loans with fixed-rate $54,294  $160,737  $155,567  $370,600  $71,304 $148,603 $140,388 $360,295 
Loans with floating-rate  55,645   89,893   120,490   266,026  61,306 129,649 156,549 347,504 
                  
Total $109,939  $250,630  $276,057  $636,626  $132,610 $278,252 $296,937 $707,799 
                  
  
Percent composition of maturity  17.3%  39.3%  43.4%  100.0%  18.7%  39.3%  42.0%  100.0%
Fixed-rate loans as a percentage of total loans              58.2%  50.9%
Floating-rate loans as a percentage of total loans              41.8%  49.1%
     
The loan maturity information is based upon original loan terms and is not adjusted for principal paydowns and rollovers. In the ordinary course of business, loans maturing within one year may be renewed, in whole or in part, as to principal amount at interest rates prevailing at the date of renewal.


35


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.OBLIGATIONS. . .The following table presents, as of December 31, 2007,2008, significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced note to the consolidated financial statements.
                         
  PAYMENTS DUE IN
  NOTE ONE YEAR ONE TO THREE THREE TO FIVE OVER FIVE  
  REFERENCE OR LESS YEARS YEARS YEARS TOTAL
  (IN THOUSANDS)
Deposits without a stated maturity  8  $377,646  $  $  $  $377,646 
Certificates of deposit*  8   200,784   86,957   30,823   24,255   342,819 
Borrowed funds*  10   125,420   11,190   147   692   137,449 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures*  10            32,158   32,158 
Pension obligation  13   1,500            1,500 
Lease commitments  14   613   945   428   391   2,377 
                         
  Payments due in 
  Note
  One Year
  One to Three
  Three to Five
  Over Five
    
  Reference  or Less  Years  Years  Years  Total 
  (In thousands) 
 
Deposits without a stated maturity  8  $363,707  $  $  $  $363,707 
Certificates of deposit*  8   245,387   78,661   29,039   24,234   377,321 
Borrowed funds*  10   76,001   10,443   146   819   87,409 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures*  10            33,264   33,264 
Pension obligation  13   1,100            1,100 
Lease commitments  14   582   970   524   502   2,578 
 
*Includes interest based upon interest rates in effect at December 31, 2007.2008. Future changes in market interest rates could materially affect contractual amounts to be paid.
     
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS.ARRANGEMENTS. . . The Bank incurs off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These risks derive from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments and standby letters of credit involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by their contractual amounts. The Bank uses the same

31


credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for all other lending. The Company had various outstanding commitments to extend credit approximating $93,583,000$112,192,000 and standby letters of credit of $7,884,000$13,064,000 as of December 31, 2007.2008. The Company can also use various interest rate contracts, such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and swaptions to help manage interest rate and market valuation risk exposure, which is incurred in normal recurrent banking activities. As of December 31, 2007, there were no2008, the Company had $18 million in interest rate contractsswaps outstanding.
     
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES.ESTIMATES. . . The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and conform to general practices within the banking industry. Accounting and reporting policies for the allowance for loan losses, goodwill and core deposit intangibles and income taxes are deemed critical because they involve the use of estimates and require significant management judgments. Application of assumptions different than those used by the Company could result in material changes in the Company’s financial position or results of operation.
     
ACCOUNT — Allowance for Loan Losses
     
BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Allowance for Loan Losses
     
INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Provision for Loan Losses
     
DESCRIPTION
     
The allowance for loan losses is calculated with the objective of maintaining reserve levels believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable credit losses. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the credit portfolio and other relevant factors. However, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including, among others, likelihood of customer default, loss given default, exposure at default, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, value of collateral, estimated losses on consumer loans and residential mortgages, and general amounts for historical loss experience. This process also considers economic conditions, uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in the various credit portfolios. All of these factors may be susceptible to


36


significant change. Also, the allocation of the allowance for credit losses to specific loan pools is based on historical loss trends and management’s judgment concerning those trends.
     
Commercial and commercial mortgagesmortgage loans are the largest category of credits and the most sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the allowance for loan loss. Approximately $5.7$7.3 million, or 79%82%, of the total allowance for creditloan losses at December 31, 20072008 has been allotted to these two loan categories. This allocation also considers other relevant factors such as actual versus estimated losses, economic trends, delinquencies, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy, financial information and documentation exceptions. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provision for credit losses may be required that would adversely impact earnings in future periods.
     ACCOUNT — Goodwill and core deposit intangibles
     BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Goodwill and core deposit intangibles
     INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Goodwill impairment and amortization of core deposit intangibles
     DESCRIPTION
     The Company considers our accounting policies related to goodwill and core deposit intangibles to be critical because the assumptions or judgment used in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in past acquisitions are subjective and complex. As a result, changes in these assumptions or judgment could have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
     The fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, including the resulting goodwill, was based either on quoted market prices or provided by other third party sources, when available. When third party information was not available, estimates were made in good faith by management primarily through the use of internal cash flow modeling techniques. The assumptions that were used in the cash flow modeling were subjective and are susceptible to significant changes. The Company routinely utilizes the services of an independent third party that is regarded within the banking industry as an expert in valuing core deposits to monitor the ongoing value and changes in the Company’s core deposit base. These core deposit valuation updates are based upon specific data provided from statistical analysis of the bank’s own deposit behavior to estimate the duration of these non-maturity deposits combined with market interest rates and other economic factors.

32


     Goodwill arising from business combinations represents the value attributable to unidentifiable intangible elements in the business acquired. The Company’s goodwill relates to value inherent in the banking business and the value is dependent upon the Company’s ability to provide quality, cost-effective services in the face of free competition from other market participants on a regional basis. This ability relies upon continuing investments in processing systems, the development of value-added service features and the ease of use the Company’s services. As such, goodwill value is supported ultimately by revenue that is driven by the volume of business transacted and the loyalty of the Company’s deposit base over a longer time frame. The quality and value of a Company’s assets is also an important factor to consider when performing goodwill impairment testing. A decline in earnings as a result of a lack of growth or the inability to deliver cost-effective value added services over sustained periods can lead to impairment of goodwill.
     Goodwill which has an indefinite useful life is tested for impairment at least annually and written down and charged to results of operations only in periods in which the recorded value is more than the estimated fair value. The Company’s testing in 2008 indicated that its goodwill was not impaired. Core deposit intangibles that have a finite life will continue to be amortized over their useful life and are also regularly evaluated for impairment.
     As of December 31, 2008, goodwill and core deposit intangibles were not considered impaired; however, deteriorating economic conditions could result in impairment, which could adversely affect earnings in future periods.
ACCOUNT — Income Taxes
     
BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Deferred Tax Asset and Current Taxes Payable
     
INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Provision for Income Taxes
     
DESCRIPTION
     
In accordance with the liability method of accounting for income taxes specified in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) #109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” the provision for income taxes is the sum of income taxes both currently payable and deferred. The changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the changes in differences between the basis of asset and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that management estimates will be in effect when the differences reverse.
     
In relation to recording the provision for income taxes, management must estimate the future tax rates applicable to the reversal of tax differences, make certain assumptions regarding whether tax differences are permanent or temporary and the related timing of the expected reversal. Also, estimates are made as to whether taxable operating income in future periods will be sufficient to fully recognize any gross deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. Alternatively, we may make estimates about the potential usage of deferred tax assets that decrease our valuation allowances. As of December 31, 2007,2008, we believe that all of the deferred tax assets recorded on our balance sheet will ultimately be recovered.recovered and that no valuation allowances were needed.
     
In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.
     
ACCOUNT — Investment Securities
     
BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Investment Securities
     
INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Net realized gains (losses) on investment securities
     
DESCRIPTION
     
Available-for-sale andheld-to-maturity securities are reviewed quarterly for possibleother-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances of each individual investment such as the severity of loss, the length of time the fair value has been below cost, the expectation for that security’s performance, the creditworthiness of the issuer and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security to recovery. A decline in value that is considered to beother-than-temporary is recorded as a loss within non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At December 31, 2007, 100%2008, 97% of the

33


unrealized losses in theavailable-for-sale security portfolio were comprised of securities issued by Government agencies, U.S. Treasury or


37


Government sponsored agencies. The Company believes the price movements in these securities are dependent upon the movement in market interest rates. The Company’s management also maintains the intent and ability to hold securities in an unrealized loss position to the earlier of the recovery of losses or maturity.
     
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT.STATEMENTS. . .
THE STRATEGIC FOCUS:
     
The challenge for the future is to improve earnings performance to peer levels through a disciplined focus on community banking and our growing Trust Company. In accordance with our strategic plan, AmeriServ will maintain its focus as a community bank delivering banking and trust services to the best of our ability. This company will not succumb to the lure of quick fixes and fancy financial gimmicks. We have seen where that path leads, and have marveled at how many knowledgeable people fall victim. It is our plan to continue to build AmeriServ into a potent banking force in this region and in this industry. Our focus encompasses the following:
Customer Service — it is the existing and prospective customer that AmeriServ must satisfy. This means good products and fair prices. But it also means quick response time and professional competence. It means speedy problem resolution and a minimizing of bureaucratic frustrations. AmeriServ is training and motivating its staff to meet these standards.
• Customer Service — it is the existing and prospective customer that AmeriServ must satisfy. This means good products and fair prices. But it also means quick response time and professional competence. It means speedy problem resolution and a minimizing of bureaucratic frustrations. AmeriServ is training and motivating its staff to meet these standards.
• Revenue Growth — It is necessary for AmeriServ to focus on growing revenues. This means loan growth, deposit growth and fee growth. It also means close coordination between all customer service areas so as many revenue producing products as possible can be presented to existing and prospective customers. The Company’s Strategic Plan contains action plans in each of these areas. This challenge will be met by seeking to exceed customer expectations in every area. An examination of the peer bank database provides ample proof that a well executed community banking business model can generate a reliable and rewarding revenue stream.
• Expense Rationalization — a quick review of recent AmeriServ financial statements tells the story of a continuing process of expense rationalization. This has not been a program of broad based cuts but has been targeted so AmeriServ stays strong but spends less. However, this initiative takes on new importance because it is critical to be certain that future expenditures are directed to areas that are playing a positive role in the drive to improve revenues.
Revenue Growth — It is necessary for AmeriServ to focus on growing revenues. This means loan growth, deposit growth and fee growth. It also means close coordination between all customer service areas so as many revenue producing products as possible can be presented to existing and prospective customers. The Company’s Strategic Plan contains action plans in each of these areas. This challenge will be met by seeking to exceed customer expectations in every area. An examination of the peer bank database provides ample proof that a well executed community banking business model can generate a reliable and rewarding revenue stream.
Expense Rationalization — a quick review of recent AmeriServ financial statements tells the story of a continuing process of trying to rationalize expenses. This has not been a program of broad based cuts but has been targeted so AmeriServ stays strong but spends less. However, this initiative takes on new importance because it is critical to be certain that future expenditures are directed to areas that are playing a positive role in the drive to improve revenues.
     
Each of the preceding charges has become the focus at AmeriServ, particularly in the three major customer service, revenue generating areas.
1. THE RETAIL BANK — this business unit has emerged from the past difficulties strong and eager to grow. It has new powers in that it now includes Consumer Lending and Residential Mortgages. But more importantly, it has a solid array of banking services, and a broad distribution of community offices in its primary market. This business unit will provide a solid foundation for the company as it presents its new, positive face to the community.
1.THE RETAIL BANK — this business unit had a successful 2008 and is eager to continue to grow. It has a solid array of banking services that includes deposit gathering, consumer lending and residential mortgages. With its broad distribution of community offices in its primary market, this business unit provides a solid foundation for the company to grow from.
2.COMMERCIAL LENDING — this business unit is already in a growth mode. It has totally revised procedures and has recruited an experienced professional staff. But it also has the skills and energy to provide financial advice and counsel. The challenge is to shorten response time, to eliminate bureaucracy and to always understand the needs of the customer. This business unit has already proven its value with record loan production in each of the past two years. The challenge is to maintain this momentum and to continue working to maximize its potential.
3.TRUST COMPANY — the Trust Company has already proven its ability to grow its assets under management along with its fees. It has restructured itself into a true 21st Century business model which has improved its marketplace focus. It has a positive investment performance record which enables it to excel in traditional trust functions such as wealth management. But also, it has shown creativity in building a position of substance in the vast world of union managed pension funds. Resources will continue to be channeled to the Trust Company so that this kind of creativity can continue to lead to new opportunities. Also, synergies need to be developed between the Trust Company and West Chester Capital Advisors so that revenue growth can be further enhanced.
     
2. COMMERCIAL LENDING — this business unit is already in a growth mode. It has totally revised procedures and has recruited an experienced professional staff. But it also has the skills and energy to provide financial advice and counsel. The challenge is to shorten response time, to eliminate bureaucracy and to always understand the needs of the customer. This business unit has already proven its value, while now only in the early stages of working to maximize its potential.
3. TRUST COMPANY — the Trust Company has already proven its ability to grow its assets under management along with its fees. It has restructured itself into a true 21st Century business model which has improved its marketplace focus. It has a positive investment performance record which enables it to excel in traditional trust functions such as wealth management. But also, it has shown creativity in building a position of substance in the vast world of union managed pension funds. Resources will continue to be channeled to the Trust Company so that this kind of creativity can continue to lead to new opportunities. Also, synergies need to be developed between the Trust Company and West Chester Capital Advisors so that revenue growth can be further enhanced.
ThisForm 10-K contains various forward-looking statements and includes assumptions concerning the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations estimates, intentions, operations, future results, and prospects, including statements that include the words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and are subject to risk and uncertainties. In connection with the “safe harbor”


38


provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the following cautionary statement identifying important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control) which could cause

34


the actual results or events to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the forward-looking statements and related assumptions.
     
Such factors include the following: (i) the effect of changing regional and national economic conditions; (ii) the effects of trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (iii) significant changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds; (iv) inflation, stock and bond market, and monetary fluctuations; (v) credit risks of commercial, real estate, consumer, and other lending activities; (vi) changes in federal and state banking and financial services laws and regulations; (vii) the presence in the Company’s market area of competitors with greater financial resources than the Company; (viii) the timely development of competitive new products and services by the Company and the acceptance of those products and services by customers and regulators (when required); (ix) the willingness of customers to substitute competitors’ products and services for those of the Company and vice versa; (x) changes in consumer spending and savings habits; (xi) unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings; and (xii) other external developments which could materially impact the Company’s operational and financial performance.
     
The foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive, and neither such list nor any forward-looking statement takes into account the impact that any future acquisition may have on the Company and on any such forward-looking statement.


39


ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     
Risk identification and management are essential elements for the successful management of the Company. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various types of risk, including interest rate, credit, and liquidity risk. The Company controls and monitors these risks with policies, procedures, and various levels of managerial and Board oversight. The Company’s objective is to optimize profitability while managing and controlling risk within Board approved policy limits.
     
Interest rate risk is the sensitivity of net interest income and the market value of financial instruments to the magnitude, direction, and frequency of changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk results from various repricing frequencies and the maturity structure of assets, liabilities, and hedges. The Company uses its asset liability management policy and hedging policy to control and manage interest rate risk.
     
Liquidity risk represents the inability to generate cash or otherwise obtain funds at reasonable rates to satisfy commitments to borrowers, as well as, the obligations to depositors and debtholders. The Company uses its asset liability management policy and contingency funding plan to control and manage liquidity risk.
     
Credit risk represents the possibility that a customer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms. Credit risk results from extending credit to customers, purchasing securities, and entering into certain off-balance sheet loan funding commitments. The Company’s primary credit risk occurs in the loan portfolio. The Company uses its credit policy and disciplined approach to evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to control and manage credit risk. The Company’s investment policy and hedging policy strictly limit the amount of credit risk that may be assumed in the investment portfolio and through hedging activities.
For information regarding the market risk of the Company’s financial instruments, see Interest Rate Sensitivity in the MD&A presented on pages33-35. 30-32. The Company’s principal market risk exposure is to interest rates.


4035


ITEM 8.CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
         
  At December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
ASSETS
Cash and due from depository institutions $24,715  $23,491 
Interest bearing deposits  197   413 
         
Cash and cash equivalents  24,912   23,904 
         
Investment securities:        
Available for sale  144,941   175,543 
Held to maturity (market value $18,378 at December 31, 2007 and $20,460 at December 31, 2006)  18,533   20,657 
Loans held for sale  1,060   358 
Loans  635,566   589,591 
Less: Unearned income  471   514 
Allowance for loan losses  7,252   8,092 
         
Net loans  627,843   580,985 
         
Premises and equipment, net  8,450   8,562 
Accrued income receivable  4,032   4,165 
Goodwill  13,497   9,544 
Core deposit intangibles  973   1,838 
Bank owned life insurance  32,864   32,256 
Net deferred tax asset  13,750   15,837 
Regulatory stock  7,204   5,355 
Other assets  6,819   16,988 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $904,878  $895,992 
         
 
LIABILITIES
Non-interest bearing deposits $113,380  $107,559 
Interest bearing deposits  597,059   634,196 
         
Total deposits  710,439   741,755 
         
Short-term borrowings  72,210   49,091 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  9,905   946 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures  13,085   13,085 
         
Total borrowed funds  95,200   63,122 
         
Other liabilities  8,945   6,431 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES  814,584   811,308 
         
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; there were no shares issued and outstanding on December 31, 2007, and 2006      
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 26,279,916 shares issued and 22,188,997 shares outstanding on December 31, 2007; 26,247,013 shares issued and 22,156,094 shares outstanding on December 31, 2006  65,700   65,618 
Treasury stock at cost, 4,090,919 shares on December 31, 2007 and 2006  (65,824)  (65,824)
Capital surplus  78,788   78,739 
Retained earnings  15,602   12,568 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net  (3,972)  (6,417)
         
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  90,294   84,684 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $904,878  $895,992 
         
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
ASSETS        
Cash and due from depository institutions $17,945  $24,715 
Interest bearing deposits  1,601   197 
Short-term investments in money market funds  15,578   4,359 
       
Cash and cash equivalents  35,124   29,271 
       
Investment securities:        
Available for sale  126,781   140,582 
Held to maturity (market value $16,323 at December 31, 2008 and $18,378 at December 31, 2007)  15,894   18,533 
Loans held for sale  1,000   1,060 
Loans  706,799   635,566 
Less: Unearned income  691   471 
     Allowance for loan losses  8,910   7,252 
       
Net loans  697,198   627,843 
       
         
Premises and equipment, net  9,521   8,450 
Accrued income receivable  3,735   4,032 
Goodwill  13,497   13,497 
Core deposit intangibles  108   973 
Bank owned life insurance  32,929   32,864 
Net deferred tax asset  12,651   13,750 
Regulatory stock  9,739   7,204 
Other assets  8,752   6,819 
       
TOTAL ASSETS $966,929  $904,878 
       
         
LIABILITIES        
Non-interest bearing deposits $116,372  $113,380 
Interest bearing deposits  578,584   597,059 
       
Total deposits  694,956   710,439 
       
         
Short-term borrowings  119,920   72,210 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  13,858   9,905 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures  13,085   13,085 
       
Total borrowed funds  146,863   95,200 
       
         
Other liabilities  11,858   8,945 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES  853,677   814,584 
       
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; there were 21,000 shares issued and outstanding on December 31, 2008, and no shares issued or outstanding on December 31, 2007  20,447    
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 26,317,450 shares issued and 21,128,831 shares outstanding on December 31, 2008; 26,279,916 shares issued and 22,188,997 shares outstanding on December 31, 2007  65,794   65,700 
Treasury stock at cost, 5,188,619 shares on December 31, 2008 and 4,090,919 shares on December 31, 2007  (68,659)  (65,824)
Capital surplus  79,353   78,788 
Retained earnings  20,533   15,602 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net  (4,216)  (3,972)
       
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  113,252   90,294 
       
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $966,929  $904,878 
       
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


4136


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands, except
 
  per share data) 
 
INTEREST INCOME            
Interest and fees on loans:            
Taxable $41,345  $37,366  $32,685 
Tax exempt  218   231   262 
Deposits with banks  20   23   6 
Federal funds sold  121   3    
Investment securities:            
Available for sale  6,636   7,868   11,926 
Held to maturity  1,039   1,074   986 
             
Total Interest Income  49,379   46,565   45,865 
             
INTEREST EXPENSE            
Deposits  22,811   19,232   12,985 
Short-term borrowings  972   1,672   2,599 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  253   63   4,510 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures  1,120   1,120   1,659 
             
Total Interest Expense  25,156   22,087   21,753 
             
Net Interest Income  24,223   24,478   24,112 
Provision for loan losses  300   (125)  (175)
             
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses  23,923   24,603   24,287 
             
NON-INTEREST INCOME            
Trust fees  6,753   6,519   6,129 
Net gains on loans held for sale  307   105   209 
Net realized losses on investment securities        (2,499)
Service charges on deposit accounts  2,579   2,561   2,700 
Investment advisory fees  974       
Bank owned life insurance  1,268   1,207   1,017 
Other income  2,826   2,449   2,653 
             
Total Non-Interest Income  14,707   12,841   10,209 
             
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE            
Salaries and employee benefits  19,339   18,669   19,062 
Net occupancy expense  2,494   2,410   2,552 
Equipment expense  2,045   2,349   2,509 
Professional fees  3,197   3,208   4,242 
Supplies, postage, and freight  1,211   1,167   1,154 
Miscellaneous taxes and insurance  1,436   1,567   1,762 
FDIC deposit insurance expense  88   192   289 
Amortization of core deposit intangibles  865   865   865 
Federal Home Loan Bank and hedge prepayment penalties        12,287 
Other expense  3,997   4,265   4,698 
             
Total Non-Interest Expense  34,672   34,692   49,420 
             
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES  3,958   2,752   (14,924)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  924   420   (5,902)
             
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS  3,034   2,332   (9,022)
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS NET OF TAX BENEFIT $(61)        (119)
             
NET INCOME (LOSS) $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141)
             
PER COMMON SHARE DATA FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:            
Basic:            
Income (loss) $0.14  $0.11  $(0.44)
Average number of shares outstanding  22,171   22,141   20,340 
Diluted:            
Income (loss) $0.14  $0.11  $(0.44)
Average number of shares outstanding  22,173   22,149   20,340 
PER COMMON SHARE DATA:            
Basic:            
Net income (loss) $0.14  $0.11  $(0.45)
Average number of shares outstanding  22,171   22,141   20,340 
Diluted:            
Net income (loss) $0.14  $0.11  $(0.45)
Average number of shares outstanding  22,173   22,149   20,340 
Cash dividends declared $0.00  $0.00  $0.00 
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS, 
  EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 
INTEREST INCOME            
Interest and fees on loans:            
Taxable $40,817  $41,345  $37,366 
Tax exempt  200   218   231 
Deposits with banks  13   20   23 
Short-term investments in money market funds  140   203   188 
Federal funds sold  4   121   3 
Investment securities:            
Available for sale  5,770   6,433   7,680 
Held to maturity  875   1,039   1,074 
          
Total Interest Income  47,819   49,379   46,565 
          
             
INTEREST EXPENSE            
Deposits  15,680   22,811   19,232 
Short-term borrowings  1,403   972   1,672 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank   499    253   63 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures  1,120   1,120   1,120 
          
Total Interest Expense  18,702   25,156   22,087 
          
             
Net Interest Income  29,117   24,223   24,478 
Provision for loan losses  2,925    300   (125)
          
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses  26,192   23,923   24,603 
          
             
NON-INTEREST INCOME            
Trust fees  6,731   6,753   6,519 
Net gains on loans held for sale  477   307   105 
Net realized losses on investment securities  (95)      
Service charges on deposit accounts  3,069   2,579   2,561 
Investment advisory fees  779   974    
Bank owned life insurance  2,695   1,268   1,207 
Other income  2,768   2,826   2,449 
          
Total Non-Interest Income  16,424   14,707   12,841 
          
             
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE            
Salaries and employee benefits  19,217   19,339   18,669 
Net occupancy expense  2,561   2,494   2,410 
Equipment expense  1,677   2,045   2,349 
Professional fees  3,582   3,197   3,208 
Supplies, postage, and freight  1,252   1,211   1,167 
Miscellaneous taxes and insurance  1,395   1,436   1,567 
FDIC deposit insurance expense  113   88   192 
Amortization of core deposit intangibles  865   865   865 
Federal Home Loan Bank prepayment penalties  91       
Other expense  4,884   3,997   4,265 
          
Total Non-Interest Expense  35,637   34,672   34,692 
          
             
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES  6,979   3,958   2,752 
Provision for income taxes  1,470   924   420 
          
NET INCOME $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
          
             
PER COMMON SHARE DATA:            
Basic:            
Net income $0.25  $0.14  $0.11 
Average number of shares outstanding  21,833   22,171   22,141 
Diluted:            
Net income $0.25  $0.14  $0.11 
Average number of shares outstanding  21,975   22,173   22,149 
Cash dividends declared $0.025  $0.00  $0.00 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


4237


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)            
Net income (loss) $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141)
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:            
Pension obligation change for defined benefit plan  21       
Income tax effect  (7)      
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale securities arising during period  3,683   1,309   (3,605)
Income tax effect  (1,252)  (444)  1,226 
Reclassification adjustment for losses on available for sale securities included in net loss        2,499 
Income tax effect        (850)
             
Other comprehensive income (loss)  2,445   865   (730)
             
Comprehensive income (loss) $5,479  $3,197  $(9,871)
             
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME            
Net income $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
             
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:            
Pension obligation change for defined benefit plan  (3,745)  21    
Income tax effect  1,273   (7)   
Unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities arising during period  3,471   3,683   1,309 
Income tax effect  (1,180)  (1,252)  (444)
Reclassification adjustment for losses on available for sale securities included in net income  (95)      
Income tax effect  32       
          
Other comprehensive income (loss)  (244)  2,445   865 
          
             
Comprehensive income $5,265  $5,479  $3,197 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


4338


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
COMMON STOCK            
Balance at beginning of period $65,618  $65,508  $59,522 
Stock options exercised/new shares issued  82   110   67 
Shares issued from private offering        5,919 
             
Balance at end of period  65,700   65,618   65,508 
             
TREASURY STOCK            
Balance at beginning of period  (65,824)  (65,824)  (65,824)
             
Balance at end of period  (65,824)  (65,824)  (65,824)
             
CAPITAL SURPLUS            
Balance at beginning of period  78,739   78,620   75,480 
Stock options exercised/new shares issued  37   64   66 
Stock option expense  12   55    
Shares issued from private offering, net of issuance costs        3,074 
             
Balance at end of period  78,788   78,739   78,620 
             
RETAINED EARNINGS            
Balance at beginning of period  12,568   10,236   19,377 
Net income (loss)  3,034   2,332   (9,141)
             
Balance at end of period  15,602   12,568   10,236 
             
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS            
Balance at beginning of period  (6,417)  (4,066)  (3,336)
Cumulative effect of adoption of change in accounting for pension obligation, net of tax effect     (3,216)   
Other comprehensive income (loss)  2,445   865   (730)
             
Balance at end of period  (3,972)  (6,417)  (4,066)
             
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $90,294  $84,684  $84,474 
             
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
PREFERRED STOCK            
Balance at beginning of period $  $  $ 
New shares issued (21,000 shares)  20,447       
          
Balance at end of period  20,447       
          
             
COMMON STOCK            
Balance at beginning of period  65,700   65,618   65,508 
New shares issued (37,534 shares)  94   82   110 
          
Balance at end of period  65,794   65,700   65,618 
          
             
TREASURY STOCK            
Balance at beginning of period  (65,824)  (65,824)  (65,824)
Treasury stock, purchased at cost (1,097,700 shares)  (2,835)      
          
Balance at end of period  (68,659)  (65,824)  (65,824)
          
             
CAPITAL SURPLUS            
Balance at beginning of period  78,788   78,739   78,620 
New common shares issued (37,534 shares)  5   37   64 
Stock option expense  7   12   55 
Common stock warrant issued (1,312,500 shares)  553       
          
Balance at end of period  79,353   78,788   78,739 
          
             
RETAINED EARNINGS            
Balance at beginning of period  15,602   12,568   10,236 
Net income  5,509   3,034   2,332 
Cash dividend declared on preferred stock  (35)      
Cash dividend declared on common stock of $0.025 on 21,771,237 shares  (543)      
          
Balance at end of period  20,533   15,602   12,568 
          
             
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS            
Balance at beginning of period  (3,972)  (6,417)  (4,066)
Cumulative effect of adoption of change in accounting for pension obligation, net of tax effect        (3,216)
Other comprehensive income  (244)  2,445   865 
          
Balance at end of period  (4,216)  (3,972)  (6,417)
          
   
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $113,252  $90,294  $84,684 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


4439


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
             
  Year Ended December 31 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
            
Net income (loss) $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141)
Loss from discontinued operations        (119)
             
Income (loss) from continuing operations  3,034   2,332   (9,022)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:            
Provision for loan losses  300   (125)  (175)
Depreciation and amortization expense  1,505   1,700   1,817 
Amortization expense of core deposit intangibles  865   865   865 
Net amortization of investment securities  387   597   1,560 
Net realized losses on investment securities — available for sale        2,499 
Net gain on sale of fixed assets  (248)      
Net realized gains on loans held for sale  (307)  (105)  (209)
Amortization of deferred loan fees  (518)  (393)  (421)
Loss on prepayment of interest rate swaps        5,825 
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale  (26,720)  (11,714)  (16,807)
Sales of mortgage loans held for sale  26,325   11,454   17,298 
Write-off of debt issuance costs        210 
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable  133   (40)  163 
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable  530   1,029   (707)
Net decrease (increase) in other assets  2,047   (1,148)  (10,605)
Net increase in other liabilities  3,000   627   889 
             
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations  10,333   5,079   (6,820)
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations        (597)
             
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  10,333   5,079   (7,417)
             
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
            
Purchase of investment securities — available for sale  (6,768)  (8,823)  (32,469)
Purchase of investment securities — held to maturity     (1,500)   
Purchase of regulatory stock  (5,824)  (3,363)   
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities — available for sale  42,639   28,088   60,086 
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities — held to maturity  2,054   11,104   3,701 
Proceeds from sales of investment securities — available for sale        132,595 
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock  3,975   4,996    
Long-term loans originated  (180,558)  (142,247)  (119,012)
Principal collected on long-term loans  163,819   112,027   110,991 
Loans purchased or participated  (33,762)  (10,004)  (22,104)
Loans sold or participated  4,500   1,600   1,000 
Net increase in other short-term loans  (332)  (377)  (497)
Purchases of premises and equipment  (1,667)  (1,597)  (1,028)
Proceeds from sale/retirement of premises and equipment  522   50   210 
Acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors  2,200       
             
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (9,202)  (10,046)  133,473 
             
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
            
Net (decrease) increase in deposit accounts  (31,316)  22,608   68,264 
Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings  23,119   (14,093)  (88,751)
Principal advances on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  9,004       
Principal repayments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  (45)  (41)  (100,039)
Cancellation payment of interest rate swaps        (5,825)
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture dividends paid  (1,016)  (1,016)  (1,546)
Redemption of guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures        (7,200)
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan and stock options exercised  131   173   133 
Private placement issuance of common stock        10,300 
Costs associated with private placement        (1,482)
             
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (123)  7,631   (126,146)
             
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  1,008   2,664   (90)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1  23,904   21,240   21,330 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31 $24,912  $23,904  $21,240 
             
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
            
Net income $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Provision for loan losses  2,925   300   (125)
Depreciation and amortization expense  1,533   1,505   1,700 
Amortization expense of core deposit intangibles  865   865   865 
Net amortization of investment securities  193   387   597 
Net realized losses on investment securities — available for sale  95       
Net gain on sale of fixed assets     (248)   
Net realized gains on loans held for sale  (477)  (307)  (105)
Amortization of deferred loan fees  (466)  (518)  (393)
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale  (36,923)  (26,720)  (11,714)
Sales of mortgage loans held for sale  37,460   26,325   11,454 
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable  297   133   (40)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable  (899)  530   1,029 
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance  (2,695)  (1,268)  (1,207)
Net decrease in other assets  459   779   59 
Net increase in other liabilities  1,048   3,000   627 
          
Net cash provided by operating activities  8,924   10,333   5,079 
          
             
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
            
Purchase of investment securities — available for sale  (68,610)  (6,768)  (8,823)
Purchase of investment securities — held to maturity  (4,464)     (1,500)
Purchase of regulatory stock  (8,268)  (5,824)  (3,363)
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities — available for sale  59,299   41,988   33,098 
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities — held to maturity  7,052   2,054   11,104 
Proceeds from sales of investment securities — available for sale  25,941       
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock  5,733   3,975   4,996 
Long-term loans originated  (152,535)  (180,558)  (142,247)
Principal collected on long-term loans  133,043   163,819   112,027 
Loans purchased or participated  (56,182)  (33,762)  (10,004)
Loans sold or participated  3,950   4,500   1,600 
Net decrease (increase) in other short-term loans  90   (332)  (377)
Purchases of premises and equipment  (2,604)  (1,667)  (1,597)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment     522   50 
Proceeds from insurance policies  2,635       
Acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors     2,200    
          
Net cash used in investing activities  (54,920)  (9,853)  (5,036)
          
             
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
            
Net (decrease) increase in deposit accounts  (16,526)  (31,316)  22,608 
Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings  47,710   23,119   (14,093)
Principal borrowings on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  11,000   9,004    
Principal repayments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  (7,047)  (45)  (41)
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture dividends paid  (1,016)  (1,016)  (1,016)
Common stock dividend paid  (543)      
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan and stock options exercised  106   131   173 
Purchases of treasury stock  (2,835)      
Preferred stock issuance  21,000       
          
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  51,849   (123)  7,631 
          
             
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  5,853   357   7,674 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1  29,271   28,914   21,240 
          
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31 $35,124  $29,271  $28,914 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


4540


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At and for the Years EndedAT AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DecemberDECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006 and 2005
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BUSINESS AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS:
     
AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (the Company) is a bank holding company, headquartered in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. Through its banking subsidiary the Company operates 1918 banking locations in five southwestern Pennsylvania counties. These branches provide a full range of consumer, mortgage, and commercial financial products. The AmeriServ Trust and Financial Services Company (Trust Company) offers a complete range of trust and financial services and administers assets valued at approximately $1.9$1.5 billion at December 31, 2007.2008. On March 7, 2007, the Bank completed the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA). WCCA (a subsidiary of the bank) is a registered investment advisor with expertise in large cap stocks and at December 31, 20072008 had $137$82 million in assets under management.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION:
     
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, AmeriServ Financial Bank (the Bank), Trust Company, and AmeriServ Life Insurance Company (AmeriServ Life). The Bank is a state-chartered full service bank with 1918 locations in Pennsylvania. On March 7, 2007, the Bank completed the acquisition of West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA). WCCA is a registered investment advisor with expertise in large cap stocks and at December 31, 2007 had $137 million in assets under management. Standard Mortgage Corporation of Georgia (SMC), a former wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, was a mortgage banking company whose business included the servicing of mortgage loans. The Company sold its remaining mortgage servicing rights in December 2004 and discontinued the operations of this non-core business in 2005 (see Note 23). AmeriServ Life is a captive insurance company that engages in underwriting as a reinsurer of credit life and disability insurance.
     
Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from these estimates and the differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s most significant estimate is the allowance for loan losses.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES:
     
Securities are classified at the time of purchase as investment securities held to maturity if it is management’s intent and the Company has the ability to hold the securities until maturity. These held to maturity securities are carried on the Company’s books at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount which is computed using the level yield method which approximates the effective interest method. Alternatively, securities are classified as available for sale if it is management’s intent at the time of purchase to hold the securities for an indefinite period of timeand/or to use the securities as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy. Securities classified as available for sale include securities which may be sold to effectively manage interest rate risk exposure, prepayment risk, and other factors (such as liquidity requirements). These available for sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized aggregate appreciation/depreciation excluded from income and credited/charged to accumulated other comprehensive income/loss within stockholders’ equity on a net of tax basis. Any securities classified as trading assets are reported at fair value with unrealized aggregate appreciation/depreciation included in income on a net of tax basis. The Company does not engage in trading activity. Realized gains or losses on securities sold are computed upon the adjusted cost of the specific securities sold. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are reviewed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances of each individual investment such as the severity of loss, the length of time


46


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
the fair value has been below cost, the expectation for that security’s performance, the creditworthiness of the issuer and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security to recovery.
LOANS:
     
Interest income is recognized using methods which approximate a level yield related to principal amounts outstanding. The Bank discontinues the accrual of interest income when loans become 90 days past due in either principal or interest. In addition, if circumstances warrant, the accrual of interest may be discontinued prior to 90 days. Payments received on non-accrual loans are credited to principal until full recovery of principal has been recognized; or the loan has been returned to accrual status. The only exception to this policy is for residential mortgage loans wherein interest income is recognized on a cash basis as payments are received. A non-accrual commercial loan is placed on accrual status after becoming current and remaining current for twelve consecutive payments. Residential mortgage loans are placed on accrual status upon becoming current.
LOAN FEES:
     
Loan origination and commitment fees, net of associated direct costs, are deferred and amortized into interest and fees on loans over the loan or commitment period. Fee amortization is determined by the effective interest method.

41


LOANS HELD FOR SALE:
     
Certain newly originated fixed-rate residential mortgage loans are classified as held for sale, because it is management’s intent to sell these residential mortgage loans. The residential mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT:
     
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is charged to operations over the estimated useful lives of the premises and equipment using the straight-line method with a half-year convention. Useful lives of up to 4530 years for buildings and up to 1210 years for equipment are utilized. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases or useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Maintenance, repairs, and minor alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures are incurred.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND CHARGE-OFF PROCEDURES:
     
As a financial institution, which assumes lending and credit risks as a principal element of its business, the Company anticipates that credit losses will be experienced in the normal course of business. Accordingly, the Company consistently applies a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline to perform an analysis which is updated on a quarterly basis at the Bank level to determine both the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the necessary provision for loan losses to be charged against earnings. This methodology includes:
 - review of all criticized and impaired loans with balances over $250,000 ($100,000 for loans classified as doubtful or worse) to determine if any specific reserve allocations are required on an individual loan basis. The specific reserve established for these criticized and impaired loans is based on careful analysis of the loan’s performance, the related collateral value, cash flow considerations and the financial capability of any guarantor. For impaired loans the measurement of impairment may be based upon: 1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; 2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or 3) the fair value of the collateral of a collateral dependent loan.
 
 - The application of formula driven reserve allocations for all commercial and commercial real-estate loans by using a three-year migration analysis of net losses incurred within each risk grade for the entire commercial


47


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
loan portfolio. The difference between estimated and actual losses is reconciled through the nature of the migration analysis.
 - The application of formula driven reserve allocations to consumer and mortgage loans which are based upon historical net charge-off experience for those loan types. The residential mortgage loan allocation is based upon the Company’s five-year historical average of actual loan net charge-offs experienced in that category. The same methodology is used to determine the allocation for consumer loans except the allocation is based upon an average of the most recent actual three-year historical net charge-off experience for consumer loans.
 
 - The application of formula driven reserve allocations to all outstanding loans is based upon review of historical losses and qualitative factors, which include but are not limited to, economic trends, delinquencies, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy, financial information and documentation exceptions.
 
 - Management recognizes that there may be events or economic factors that have occurred affecting specific borrowers or segments of borrowers that may not yet be fully reflected in the information that the Company uses for arriving at reserves for a specific loan or portfolio segment. Therefore, the Company believes that there is estimation risk associated with the use of specific and formula driven allowances.
     
After completion of this process, a formal meeting of the Loan Loss Reserve Committee is held to evaluate the adequacy of the reserve.
     
When it is determined that the prospects for recovery of the principal of a loan have significantly diminished, the loan is charged against the allowance account; subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance account. In addition, non-accrual and large delinquent loans are reviewed monthly to determine potential losses.
     
The Company’s policy is to individually review, as circumstances warrant, each of its commercial and commercial mortgage loans to determine if a loan is impaired. At a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loan relationships with aggregate balances in excess of $250,000 within a12-month period. The Company defines classified loans as those loans rated substandard or doubtful. The Company has also identified three pools of small dollar value homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment. These separate pools are for small business loans $250,000 or less, residential mortgage loans

42


and consumer loans. Individual loans within these pools are reviewed and removed from the poolevaluated for specific impairment if factors such as significant delinquency in payments of 90 days or more, bankruptcy, or other negative economic concerns indicate impairment.
ALLOWANCE FOR UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT:
     
The allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated losses related to these unfunded credit facilities. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the unfunded credit facilities including an assessment of the probability of commitment usage, credit risk factors for loans outstanding to these same customers and the terms and expiration dates of the unfunded credit facilities. Net adjustments to the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit are provided for in the unfunded commitment reserve expense line item within other expense in the consolidated statement of income and a separate reserve is recorded within the liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheet in other liabilities.
TRUST FEES:
     
Trust fees are recorded on the cash basis which approximates the accrual basis for such income.


48


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE:
     
The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain employees. These policies are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized. Income from these policies and changes in the cash surrender value are recorded in bank owned life insurance within non-interest income.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
Intangible Assets
     
Intangible assets consist of core deposit acquisition premiums. Core deposit intangible assetsacquisition premiums, which were developed by specific core deposit life studies, are amortized over their useful lives, which do not exceed 10 years. Prior to January 1, 2002, goodwill was amortized using the straight-line method over a periodperiods not exceeding 10 years. The recoverability of 15 years. Beginningthe carrying value of intangible assets evaluated on an ongoing basis, and permanent declines in 2002, thevalue, if any, are charged to expense.
Goodwill
     The Company ceased amortizingaccounts for goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Statement #142 (FAS #142). Standards (“FAS”) No. 142,Goodwill and core deposit intangibles are reviewedOther Intangible Assets.This statement, among other things, requires a two-step process for testing the impairment of goodwill on at least on an annual basisbasis. This approach could cause more volatility in the Company’s reported net income because impairment losses, if any, could occur irregularly and in varying amounts. The Company performs an annual impairment analysis of goodwill. Based on the fair value of the reporting unit, estimated using the expected present value of future cash flows, no impairment of goodwill was recognized in 2008 or when events occur that could result in impairment.2007.
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
     
Basic earnings per share include only the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the weighted average common shares outstanding and any potentially dilutive common stock equivalent shares in the calculation. Treasury shares are treated as retired for earnings per share purposes. Options and warrant to purchase 1,539,509, 220,892, 213,974, and 134,349213,974 shares of common stock were outstanding during 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share as the options’ exerciseto do so would be anti-dilutive. Exercise prices were greater than the average market price of theoptions and warrant to purchase common stock foroutstanding were $2.40-$6.10, $4.02-$6.10, and $4.86-$6.21 during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Dividends on preferred shares are excluded from net income in the respective periods.calculation of earnings per common share.

43


STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:
     
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) #123(R) “Share-Based Payment” using the “modified prospective” method. Under this method, awards that are granted, modified, or vested after December 15, 2005, are measured and accounted for in accordance with FAS #123(R). The Company recognized $12,000$7,000 and $55,000$12,000 of pretax compensation expense for the year 20072008 and 2006.2007. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for the grants: risk-free interest rates ranging from 3.41%2.76% to 4.70%; expected lives of 10 years; expected volatility ranging from 33.39%33.28% to 39.65%37.22% and expected dividend yields of 0%.
The Company has stock based compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 17 Stock Compensation Plans. Prior to FAS #123(R), the Company accounted for these plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion #25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation expense had been reflected in net income as all rights and options to purchase the Company’s stock granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the income from continuing operations and earnings per share as


49


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) #123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock compensation plans.
PRO FORMA NET LOSS
AND LOSS PER SHARE
     
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2005 
  (In thousands, except per
 
  share data) 
 
Net loss, as reported $(9,022)
Less: Total stock compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects  (74)
     
Pro forma net loss $(9,096)
     
Loss per share:    
Basic as reported $(0.44)
Basic pro forma  (0.45)
Diluted as reported  (0.44)
Diluted pro forma  (0.45)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:
For the Company, comprehensive loss includes net income, unfunded pension obligation and unrealized holding gains and losses from available for sale investment securities. The balances of accumulated other comprehensive loss were $(3,972,000), $(6,417,000) and $(4,066,000) at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS:
     
On a consolidated basis, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with banks, and federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell.short-term investments in money market funds. The Company made $138,000$200,000 in income tax payments in 2008; $138,000 in 2007; and $169,000 in 2006; and $54,000 in 2005.2006. The Company made total interest payments of $19,601,000 in 2008; $24,626,000 in 2007; and $21,058,000 in 2006; and $22,460,000 in 2005.2006.
INCOME TAXES:
     
INCOME TAXES:
Deferred tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate. Deferred income tax expenses or credits are based on the changes in the corresponding asset or liability from period to period. Deferred tax assets are reduced, if necessary, by the amounts of such benefits that are not expected to be realized based upon available evidence.
INTEREST RATE CONTRACTS:
     
The Company can use various interest rate contracts, suchaccounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (as amended).” The company recognizes all derivatives as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and swaptions to help manage interest rate and market valuation risk exposure, which is incurred in normal recurrent banking activities. These interest rate contracts function as hedges against specificeither assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company does not use interest rate contracts for trading purposes.
The interest rate contracts involve no exchange of principal eitherSheets and measures those instruments at inception or upon maturity; rather, they involvefair value. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the periodic exchange of interest payments arising from an underlying notional principal amount. For


50


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
interest rate swaps, the interest differential to be paid or received is accrued by the Company and recognized as an adjustment to interest income or interest expensefair value of the underlying assets or liabilities being hedged. Because only interest payments are exchanged, the cash requirementderivative and exposure to credit risk are significantly less than the notional amount.
Any premium or transaction fee incurred to purchase interest rate caps or floors is deferred and amortized to interest income or interest expense over the term of the contract. Unamortized premiumshedged item related to the purchasehedged risk are recognized in earnings. Changes in fair value of capsderivatives designated and floorsaccounted as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are includedeffective as hedges, are recorded in “Other Comprehensive Income,” net of deferred taxes and are subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any hedge ineffectiveness would be recognized in the income statement line item pertaining to the hedged item.
     The Company typically enters into derivative instruments to meet the financing, interest rate and equity risk management needs of its customers. Upon entering into these instruments to meet customer needs, the Company enters into offsetting positions to minimize interest rate and equity risk to the Company. These derivative financial instruments are reported at fair value with any resulting gain or loss recorded in current period earnings. These instruments and their offsetting positions are recorded in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. There were no interest rate contracts in place atConsolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006.2008, the notional amount of the customer related derivative financial instrument was $9 million with an average maturity of 60 months, an average interest receive rate of 5.25% and an average interest pay rate of 4.40%.
RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:
     
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations(“FAS 141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. FAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
     
In September 2006,February 2008, the FASB issued FASStaff Position No. 157-1,Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which provides enhancedremoved leasing transactions accounted for under FAS No. 13 and related guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard applies whenever other standards require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expandfrom the usescope of fair valueFAS No. 157. Also in any new circumstances.February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No.157-2,Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157, which deferred the effective date of FAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued forall nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.2008. The adoption of this standard didis not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

44


     
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which provides all entities with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of the FAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply the complex provisions of hedge accounting. FAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007 provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of FAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. The Company presently does not expect to elect to adopt this standard.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51. FAS No. 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, this statement requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. FAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
     
In September 2006,March 2008, the FASB reached consensus on the guidance providedissued FAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to require enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new standard has revised financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue06-4(“EITF 06-4”),requiring more transparency about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS No. 133,Accounting for Deferred CompensationDerivative Instruments and Postretirement Benefit AspectsHedging Activities; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. FAS No. 161 requires disclosure of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. The guidance is applicablethe fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. It also requires entities to endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements, whereby the employer owns and controls the insurance policy,provide more information about their liquidity by requiring disclosure of derivative features that are associated with


51


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
a postretirement benefit.EITF 06-4credit risk-related. Further, it requires that for a split-dollar life insurance arrangementcross-referencing within the scope of the Issue, an employer should recognize a liability for future benefits in accordance withfootnotes to enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. FAS No. 106 (if, in substance, a postretirement benefit plan exists) or Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 12 (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract) based on the substantive agreement with the employee.EITF 06-4161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after DecemberNovember 15, 2007.2008, with early application encourage. The adoption of this EITF didstandard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
     
In March 2007,April 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issueissued FASB Staff Position No. 06-10(“EITF 06-10”),142-3,Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Agreements.EITF 06-10 provides guidance for determining a liability for the postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and measurementDetermination of the associatedUseful Life of Intangible Assets(“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing assumptions about renewal or extension used in estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset onunder FAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This standard is intended to improve the basisconsistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the terms of the collateral assignment agreement.EITF 06-10asset under FAS No. 141R and other GAAP. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007.2008. The measurement provisions of this standard will apply only to intangible assets of the Company acquired after the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the FSP will have on the Company’s results of operations.
     In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 132(R)-1,Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003),Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,to improve an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets required by the FSP are to be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this EITF didFSP is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force IssueNo. 06-11(“EITF 06-11”),Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards.EITF 06-11 applies to share-based payment arrangements with dividend protection features that entitle employees to receive (a) dividends on equity-classified nonvested shares, (b) dividend equivalents on equity-classified nonvested share units, or (c) payments equal to the dividends paid on the underlying shares while an equity-classified share option is outstanding, when those dividends or dividend equivalents are charged to retained earnings under FAS No. 123R,Share-Based Payment, and result in an income tax deduction for the employer. A consensus was reached that a realized income tax benefit from dividends or dividend equivalents that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for equity-classified nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units, and outstanding equity share options should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital.EITF 06-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this EITF did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.2. CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
     
2.  CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
Cash and due from banks at December 31, 2008 and 2007, included $587,000 and 2006, included $9,107,000, and $8,481,000, respectively, of reserves required to be maintained under Federal Reserve Bank regulations.
3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
3.  INVESTMENT SECURITIES
     
The cost basis and fair values of investment securities are summarized as follows:
     
Investment securities available for sale:
                                
 At December 31, 2007  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
   Gross
 Gross
    GROSS GROSS   
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
 Fair
  UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR 
 Cost Basis Gains Losses Value  COST BASIS GAINS LOSSES VALUE 
 (In thousands)  (IN THOUSANDS) 
U.S. Treasury $6,006  $5  $  $6,011 
U.S. Agency  38,041   44   (12)  38,073  $10,387 $188 $ $10,575 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  98,484   105   (1,328)  97,261  114,380 2,057  (248) 116,189 
Other securities  3,598      (2)  3,596  24   (7) 17 
                  
Total $146,129  $154  $(1,342) $144,941  $124,791 $2,245 $(255) $126,781 
                  


5245


     
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Investment securities held to maturity:
                
 At December 31, 2007                 
   Gross
 Gross
    AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
 Fair
  GROSS GROSS   
 Cost Basis Gains Losses Value  UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR 
 (In thousands)  COST BASIS GAINS LOSSES VALUE 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
U.S. Treasury $3,153  $55  $  $3,208  $3,082 $118 $ $3,200 
U.S. Agency  3,473   23      3,496 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  6,157   13      6,170  9,562 321  9,883 
Other securities  5,750      (246)  5,504  3,250   (10) 3,240 
                  
Total $18,533  $91  $(246) $18,378  $15,894 $439 $(10) $16,323 
                  
     
Investment securities available for sale:
                
 At December 31, 2006                 
   Gross
 Gross
    AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
 Fair
  GROSS GROSS   
 Cost Basis Gains Losses Value  UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR 
 (In thousands)  COST BASIS GAINS LOSSES VALUE 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
U.S. Treasury $6,011  $  $(164) $5,847  $6,006 $5 $ $6,011 
U.S. Agency  57,636   7   (1,021)  56,622  37,255 44  (12) 37,287 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  113,460   22   (3,800)  109,682  98,484 105  (1,328) 97,261 
Other securities  3,362   30      3,392  25   (2) 23 
                  
Total $180,469  $59  $(4,985) $175,543  $141,770 $154 $(1,342) $140,582 
                  
Investment securities held to maturity:                
     Investment securities held to maturity:
                
 At December 31, 2006                 
   Gross
 Gross
    AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
 Fair
  GROSS GROSS   
 Cost Basis Gains Losses Value  UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR 
 (In thousands)  COST BASIS GAINS LOSSES VALUE 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
U.S. Treasury $3,220  $  $(69) $3,151  $3,153 $55 $ $3,208 
U.S. Agency  3,471      (75)  3,396  3,473 23  3,496 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  7,216      (53)  7,163  6,157 13  6,170 
Other securities  6,750         6,750  5,750   (246) 5,504 
                  
Total $20,657  $  $(197) $20,460  $18,533 $91 $(246) $18,378 
                  
     
Realized gains and losses are calculated by the specific identification method.
     
Maintaining investment quality is a primary objective of the Company’s investment policy which, subject to certain limited exceptions, prohibits the purchase of any investment security below a Moody’s Investors Service or Standard & Poor’s rating of A. At December 31, 2007, 94.3%2008,97.7% of the portfolio was rated AAA as compared to 94.8%96.4% at December 31, 2006.2007. Less than 1.0% of the portfolio was rated below A or unrated on December 31, 2007.2008. The Company and its subsidiaries, collectively, did not hold securities of any single issuer, excluding U.S. Treasury and U.S. Agencies, that exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2007.2008.
     
The book value of securities, both available for sale and held to maturity, pledged to secure public and trust deposits, and certain Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings was $119,267,000 at December 31, 2008 and $146,365,000 at December 31, 2007 and $182,552,000 at December 31, 2006.2007. The Company had realized $42,000 of gross investment security gains and $137,000 of gross security losses for 2008 and no security gains or losses on available for sale securities in 2007 or 2006. The Company realized $78,000 of gross investment security gains and $2,577,000 of


53


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
gross investment security losses on available for sale securities in 2005. On a net basis, the realized losses amounted to ($1,649,000) in 2005 after factoring in the tax benefit of ($850,000) for 2005. The Company realized no gross investment security gains and losses on held to maturity securities in 2008, 2007 2006 or 2005.2006. On a net basis, the realized losses amounted to $63,000 in 2008, after factoring in tax benefit of $32,000. Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale were zero during 2007 and 2006 and $133$25 million during 2005.2008. There were no sales of investment securities for 2007 or 2006.
     
The following table sets forth the contractual maturity distribution of the investment securities, cost basis and fair market values, and the weighted average yield for each type and range of maturity as of December 31, 2007.2008. Yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis, but are based upon the cost basis and are weighted for the scheduled maturity. Average maturities are based upon the original contractual maturity dates with the exception of mortgage-backed securities for which the average lives were used. At December 31, 2007, theThe Company’s consolidated investment securities portfolio had a modified duration of approximately 1.981.80 years. The weighted average expected maturity for available for sale securities at December 31, 20072008 for U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency, U.S. Agency Mortgage-Backed, and other securities was 0.87, 1.73, 4.73,2.80, 16.84, and 1.0 years, respectively. The weighted average expected maturity for held to maturity securities at December 31, 20072008 for U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency, U.S. Agency Mortgage-Backed and other securities was 1.94, 5.16, 5.011.17, 24.39 and 1.421.48 years.

46


     
Investment securities available for sale:
                                         
  At December 31, 2007 
     After 1 Year
  After 5 Years
       
     But Within
  But Within
       
  Within 1 Year  5 Years  10 Years  After 10 Years  Total 
  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
           (In thousands, except yields)          
 
COST BASIS U.S. Treasury $6,006   3.39% $   % $   % $   % $6,006   3.39%
U.S. Agency  1,983   4.61   36,058   4.38               38,041   4.39 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities        61,097   4.19   28,580   4.15   8,807   3.98   98,484   4.16 
Other securities  3,598   4.92                     3,598   4.92 
                                         
Total investment securities available for sale $11,587   4.07% $97,155   4.26% $28,580   4.15% $8,807   3.98% $146,129   4.21%
                                         
FAIR VALUE U.S. Treasury $6,011      $      $      $      $6,011     
U.S. Agency  1,984       36,089                     38,073     
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities         60,258       28,328       8,675       97,261     
Other securities  3,596                            3,596     
                                         
Total investment securities available for sale $11,591      $96,347      $28,328      $8,675      $144,941     
                                         


54


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
                                         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
          AFTER 1 YEAR  AFTER 5 YEARS       
          BUT WITHIN  BUT WITHIN       
  WITHIN 1 YEAR  5 YEARS  10 YEARS  AFTER 10 YEARS  TOTAL 
  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD  AMOUNT  YIELD 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT YIELDS) 
COST BASIS                                        
U.S. Agency $996   5.30% $9,391   3.94% $   % $   % $10,387   4.08%
U.S. Agency mortgage- backed securities        13,899   4.75   16,261   4.93   84,220   4.58   114,380   4.65 
Other securities  24   4.70                     24   4.70 
                                    
Total investment securities available for sale $1,020   5.29% $23,290   4.27% $16,261   4.93% $84,220   4.58% $124,791   4.60%
                                    
FAIR VALUE                                        
U.S. Agency $1,016      $9,559      $      $      $10,575     
U.S. Agency mortgage- backed securities         13,901       16,812       85,476       116,189     
Other securities  17                            17     
                                    
Total investment securities available for sale $1,033      $23,460      $16,812      $85,476      $126,781     
                                    
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Investment securities held to maturity:
                                   
 At December 31, 2007                                         
     After 5 Years
      AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
   After 1 Year But
 But Within
      AFTER 5 YEARS     
 Within 1 Year Within 5 Years 10 Years After 10 Years Total  AFTER 1 YEAR BUT BUT WITHIN     
 Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield  WITHIN 1 YEAR WITHIN 5 YEARS 10 YEARS AFTER 10 YEARS TOTAL 
 (In thousands, except yields)  AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD 
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT YIELDS) 
COST BASIS                                         
U.S. Treasury $   % $3,153   3.98% $   % $   % $3,153   3.98% $  % $3,082  3.98% $  % $  % $3,082  3.98%
U.S. Agency              3,473   5.22         3,473   5.22 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities        5,110   5.49   1,047   5.50         6,157   5.50 
U.S. Agency mortgage -backed securities       9,562 5.36 9,562 5.36 
Other securities  2,500   5.62   3,250   5.78                5,750   5.71  2,250 3.60 1,000 3.39    3,250 3.54 
                      
Total investment securities held to maturity $2,500   5.62% $11,513   5.16% $4,520   5.28% $   % $18,533   5.25% $2,250  3.60% $4,082  3.84% $  % $9,562  5.36% $15,894  4.72%
                      
FAIR VALUE                                         
U.S. Treasury $      $3,208      $      $      $3,208      $ $3,200 $ $ $3,200 
U.S. Agency                3,496              3,496     
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities         5,122       1,048              6,170     
U.S. Agency mortgage -backed securities    9,883 9,883 
Other securities  2,452       3,052                     5,504      2,249 991   3,240 
                      
Total investment securities held to maturity $2.452      $11,382      $4,544      $      $18,378      $2,249 $4,191 $ $9,883 $16,323 
                      
     The following tables present information concerning investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
     Investment securities available for sale:
                         
  LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED 
  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES 
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities $31,063  $(226) $3,375  $(22) $34,438  $(248)
Other        17   (7)  17   (7)
                   
Total investment securities available for sale $31,063  $(226) $3,392  $(29) $34,455  $(255)
                   
     Investment securities held to maturity:
                         
  LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED 
  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES 
Other $  $  $3,240  $(10) $3,240  $(10)
                   
Total investment securities held to maturity $  $  $3,240  $(10) $3,240  $(10)
                   

47


The following tables present information concerning investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
     
Investment securities available for sale:
                        
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months Or Longer Total                         
 Fair
 Unrealized
 Fair
 Unrealized
 Fair
 Unrealized
  LESS THAN 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS OR LONGER TOTAL 
 Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses  FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED 
 VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES 
U.S. Agency $  $  $25,963  $(12) $25,963  $(12) $ $ $25,963 $(12) $25,963 $(12)
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  4,388   (31)  81,085   (1,297)  85,473   (1,328) 4,388  (31) 81,085  (1,297) 85,473  (1,328)
Other  22   (2)        22   (2) 23  (2)   23  (2)
                          
Total investment securities available for sale $4,410  $(33) $107,048  $(1,309) $111,458  $(1,342) $4,411 $(33) $107,048 $(1,309) $111,459 $(1,342)
                          
     
Investment securities held to maturity:
                         
  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months Or Longer  Total 
  Fair
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
Other $  $  $5,504  $(246) $5,504  $(246)
                         
Total investment securities held to maturity $  $  $5,504  $(246) $5,504  $(246)
                         


55


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
                         
  LESS THAN 12 MONTHS  12 MONTHS OR LONGER  TOTAL 
  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED  FAIR  UNREALIZED 
  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES  VALUE  LOSSES 
Other $  $  $5,504  $(246) $5,504  $(246)
                   
Total investment securities held to maturity $  $  $5,504  $(246) $5,504  $(246)
                   
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following tables present information concerning investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
Investment securities available for sale:
                         
  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months Or Longer  Total 
  Fair
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
U.S. Treasury $996  $(2) $4,851  $(162) $5,847  $(164)
U.S. Agency        49,554   (1,021)  49,554   (1,021)
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  1,948   (5)  105,151   (3,795)  107,099   (3,800)
                         
Total investment securities available for sale $2,944  $(7) $159,556  $(4,978) $162,500  $(4,985)
                         
Investment securities held to maturity:
                         
  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months Or Longer  Total 
  Fair
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
  Fair
  Unrealized
 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
 
U.S. Treasury $  $  $3,151  $(69) $3,151  $(69)
U.S. Agency        3,396   (75)  3,396   (75)
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities  3,005   (17)  4,158   (36)  7,163   (53)
                         
Total investment securities held to maturity $3,005  $(17) $10,705  $(180) $13,710  $(197)
                         
For fixed maturity investments with unrealized losses due to interest rates where the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow a market recovery, declines in value below cost are not assumed to be other than temporary. There are 3721 positions that are temporarily impaired at December 31, 2007.2008. The Company reviews its position quarterly and has asserted that at December 31, 2007,2008, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does have the intentability and abilityintent to hold those securities to maturity or to allow a market recovery.
4. LOANS
4.  LOANS
     
The loan portfolio of the Company consisted of the following:
         
  At December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Commercial $118,936  $91,746 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  285,115   269,781 
Real estate-mortgage  214,839   209,728 
Consumer  16,676   18,336 
         
Loans  635,566   589,591 
Less: Unearned income  471   514 
         
Loans, net of unearned income $635,095  $589,077 
         


56


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Commercial $110,197  $118,936 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  353,870   285,115 
Real estate-mortgage  218,928   214,839 
Consumer  23,804   16,676 
       
Loans  706,799   635,566 
Less: Unearned income  691   471 
       
Loans, net of unearned income $706,108  $635,095 
       
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Real estate construction loans comprised 5.5%6.2% and 4.4%5.5% of total loans net of unearned income at December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The Company has no exposure to sub prime mortgage loans in either the loan or investment portfolios. The Company has no direct credit exposure to foreign countries. Additionally, the Company has no significant industry lending concentrations. As of December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, loans to customers engaged in similar activities and having similar economic characteristics, as defined by standard industrial classifications, did not exceed 10% of total loans.
     
In the ordinary course of business, the subsidiaries have transactions, including loans, with their officers, directors, and their affiliated companies. These transactions were on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated parties and do not involve more than the normal credit risk. These loans totaled $4,729,000$6,121,000 and $3,977,000$4,729,000 at December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. An analysis of these related party loans follows:
         
  YEAR ENDED 
  DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Balance January 1 $4,729  $3,977 
New loans  2,209   1,457 
Payments  (817)  (705)
       
Balance December 31 $6,121  $4,729 
       
         
  Year Ended
 
  December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Balance January 1 $3,977  $4,250 
New loans  1,457   350 
Payments  (705)  (623)
         
Balance December 31 $4,729  $3,977 
         

48


5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
     
5.  ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Balance January 1 $7,252  $8,092  $9,143 
Provision for loan losses  2,925   300   (125)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off  446   192   318 
Loans charged-off  (1,713)  (1,332)  (1,244)
          
Balance December 31 $8,910  $7,252  $8,092 
          
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Balance January 1 $8,092  $9,143  $9,893 
Provision for loan losses  300   (125)  (175)
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off  192   318   300 
Loans charged-off  (1,332)  (1,244)  (875)
             
Balance December 31 $7,252  $8,092  $9,143 
             
6. NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
     
6.  NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans which are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, and (iii) other real estate owned (real estate acquired through foreclosure, in-substance foreclosures and repossessed assets).


57


     
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following tables present information concerning non-performing assets:
                        
 At December 31,  AT DECEMBER 31, 
 2007 2006 2005  2008 2007 2006 
 (In thousands, except percentages)  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT 
 PERCENTAGES) 
Non-accrual loans
             
 
Commercial $3,553  $494  $2,315  $1,128 $3,553 $494 
Commercial loans secured by real estate  225   195   318  484 225 195 
Real estate-mortgage  875   1,050   1,070  1,313 875 1,050 
Consumer  585   547   446  452 585 547 
              
Total  5,238   2,286   4,149  3,377 5,238 2,286 
              
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing
             
Consumer     3   31    3 
              
Total     3   31    3 
              
Other real estate owned
             
Commercial loans secured by real estate 701   
Real estate-mortgage  42   3   130  494 42 3 
Consumer        5 
              
Total  42   3   135  1,195 42 3 
              
Total non-performing assets
 $5,280  $2,292  $4,315  $4,572 $5,280 $2,292 
              
Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned  0.83%  0.39%  0.78%  0.65%  0.83%  0.39%
Total restructured loans (included in non-accrual loans above) $1,217  $1,302  $258  $1,360 $1,217 $1,302 
     
The Company is unaware of any additional loans which are required to either be charged-off or added to the non-performing asset totals disclosed above. Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of 1) fair value minus estimated costs to sell, or 2) carrying cost.
     
The Company had non-accrual loans totaling $3,778,000$1,612,000 and $9,582,000$3,778,000 being specifically identified as impaired and a corresponding allocation reserve of $694,000$755,000 and $1,835,000$694,000 at December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The average outstanding balance for loans being specifically identified as impaired was $1,605,000 for 2008 and $3,907,000 for 2007 and $10,872,000 for 2006.2007. A majority of the impaired loans are secured by sellable collateral, dependent, therefore the estimated timing of the liquidation of the collateral and the estimated fair value of the collateral of the impaired loans isare evaluated in measuring the impairment. The interest income recognized on impaired loans during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $123,000, $0 and 2005 was $262,000, $725,000 and $833,000,$34,000, respectively.
     
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (i) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (ii) the amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans, and (iii) the net reduction in interest income attributable to such loans.
            
 Year Ended December 31,             
 2007 2006 2005  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
 (In thousands)  2008 2007 2006 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
Interest income due in accordance with original terms $215  $214  $213  $198 $215 $214 
Interest income recorded  (24)  (55)  (12)  (148)  (40)  (87)
              
Net reduction in interest income $191  $159  $201  $50 $175 $127 
              


5849


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.7. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
7.  PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
An analysis of premises and equipment follows:
        
 At December 31,         
 2007 2006  AT DECEMBER 31, 
 (In thousands)  2008 2007 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
Land $1,208  $1,714  $1,208 $1,208 
Premises  20,041   19,198  20,845 20,041 
Furniture and equipment  15,681   15,087  13,501 15,681 
Leasehold improvements  612   618  599 612 
          
Total at cost  37,542   36,617  36,153 37,542 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization  29,092   28,055  26,632 29,092 
          
Net book value $8,450  $8,562  $9,521 $8,450 
          
     
The Company recorded depreciation expense of $1.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.7 million for 2008, 2007 and $1.8 million for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
8. DEPOSITS
8.  DEPOSITS
     
The following table sets forth the balance of the Company’s deposits:
        
 At December 31,         
 2007 2006  AT DECEMBER 31, 
 (In thousands)  2008 2007 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
Demand:         
Non-interest bearing $113,380  $107,559  $116,372 $113,380 
Interest bearing  63,199   58,047  60,900 63,199 
Savings  69,155   74,452  70,682 69,155 
Money market  117,973   174,118  129,692 117,973 
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more  41,390   30,580  36,166 41,390 
Other time  305,342   296,999  281,144 305,342 
          
Total deposits $710,439  $741,755  $694,956 $710,439 
          
     
Interest expense on deposits consisted of the following:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Interest bearing demand $1,184  $606  $227 
Savings  549   644   829 
Money market  6,040   5,743   3,256 
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more  1,774   1,894   1,378 
Other time  13,264   10,345   7,295 
             
Total interest expense $22,811  $19,232  $12,985 
             


59


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Interest bearing demand $653  $1,184  $606 
Savings  535   549   644 
Money market  2,417   6,040   5,743 
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more  1,744   1,774   1,894 
Other time  10,331   13,264   10,345 
          
Total interest expense $15,680  $22,811  $19,232 
          
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table sets forth the balance of other time deposits and certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 20072008 maturing in the periods presented:
         
      CERTIFICATES OF 
      DEPOSIT 
  OTHER TIME DEPOSITS  OF $100,000 OR MORE 
YEAR  (IN THOUSANDS) 
2008 $165,136  $28,760 
2009  50,410   3,707 
2010  23,207   1,285 
2011  14,655   433 
2012  9,396   1,704 
2013 and after  18,340   277 
       
Total $281,144  $36,166 
       
         
     Certificates of
 
     Deposit
 
Year
 Other Time Deposits  of $100,000 or More 
  (In thousands) 
 
2008 $197,638  $37,519 
2009  48,094   2,310 
2010  18,776   400 
2011  8,640   561 
2012  14,411   238 
2013 and after  17,783   362 
         
Total $305,342  $41,390 
         

50


     
The aggregate amount of time certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 and individual retirement accounts with a minimum denomination of $250,000 was $85 million and $968,000, respectively, at December 31, 2007. Time certificates of deposit in excess of $100,000 and individual retirement accounts in excess of $250,000 are not federally insured.
The maturities on certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2007,2008, are as follows:
     
MATURING IN:
     
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Three months or less $11,813 
Over three through six months  13,382 
Over six through twelve months  3,565 
Over twelve months  7,406 
    
Total $36,166 
    
9. FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
     
     
  (In thousands) 
 
Three months or less $32,692 
Over three through six months  18,847 
Over six through twelve months  13,821 
Over twelve months  19,282 
     
Total $84,642 
     
9.  FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND OTHER SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
The outstanding balances and related information for federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings are summarized as follows:
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
  FEDERAL  
  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $119,920 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end  5,685   138,855 
Average balance during year  20   71,617 
Average rate paid for the year  3.16%  1.96%
Interest rate on year end balance     0.60 
        
 At December 31, 2007         
 Federal
 Other
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2007
 Funds
 Short-Term
  FEDERAL  
 Purchased Borrowings  FUNDS SHORT-TERM
 (In thousands, except rates)  PURCHASED BORROWINGS
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATES)
Balance $  $72,210  $ $72,210 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end  3,430   74,095  3,430 74,095 
Average balance during year  99   19,745  99 19,745 
Average rate paid for the year  5.18%  4.89%  5.18%  4.89%
Interest rate on year end balance     3.88   3.88 
     


60


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
         
  At December 31, 2006 
  Federal
  Other
 
  Funds
  Short-Term
 
  Purchased  Borrowings 
  (In thousands, except rates) 
 
Balance $  $49,091 
Maximum indebtedness at any month end     61,728 
Average balance during year  43   32,778 
Average rate paid for the year  5.69%  5.10%
Interest rate on year end balance     5.48 
Average amounts outstanding during the year represent daily averages. Average interest rates represent interest expense divided by the related average balances.
     
These borrowing transactions can range from overnight to one year in maturity. The average maturity was two days at the end of 20072008 and three days at the end of 2006.2007.
10.
10.  ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK AND GUARANTEED JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEFERRABLE INTEREST DEBENTURES
     
Borrowings and advances from the FHLB consist of the following:
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 
  WEIGHTED    
  AVERAGE YIELD  BALANCE 
MATURING  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Overnight  1.96% $119,920 
         
2009  4.17   3,004 
2010  3.36   10,000 
2011 and after  6.44   854 
        
Total advances  3.72   13,858 
        
Total FHLB borrowings  2.14% $133,778 
        
         
  At December 31, 2007 
  Weighted
    
Maturing
 Average Yield  Balance 
  (In thousands) 
 
Overnight  3.88% $72,210 
2009  4.62   9,004 
2010 and after  6.45   901 
         
Total advances  4.79   9,905 
         
Total FHLB borrowings  3.99% $82,115 
         

51


         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 
  WEIGHTED    
  AVERAGE YIELD  BALANCE 
MATURING  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Overnight  3.88% $72,210 
         
2009  4.62   9,004 
2010 and after  6.45   901 
        
Total advances  4.79   9,905 
        
Total FHLB borrowings  3.99% $82,115 
        
     
         
  At December 31, 2006 
  Weighted
    
  Maturing
    
Maturing
 Average Yield  Balance 
  (In thousands) 
 
Overnight  5.48% $49,091 
2011 and after  6.45   946 
         
Total FHLB borrowings  5.50% $50,037 
         
The Company’s subsidiary bank is a member of the FHLB which provides this subsidiary with the opportunity to obtain short to longer-term advances based upon the bank’s investment in assets secured by one-toone- to four-family residential real estate. The rate on open repo plus advances, which are typically overnight borrowings, can change daily, while the rate on the advances is fixed until the maturity of the advance. All FHLB stock, along with an interest in certain mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, with an aggregate statutory value equal to the amount of the advances, are pledged as collateral to the FHLB of Pittsburgh to support these borrowings.

61


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
At December 31, 2008, the bank had immediately available $183 million of overnight borrowing capability at the FHLB and $10 million of unsecured federal funds lines with correspondent banks.
Guaranteed Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures:
     
On April 28, 1998, the Company completed a $34.5 million public offering of 8.45% Trust Preferred Securities, which represent undivided beneficial interests in the assets of a Delaware business trust, AmeriServ Financial Capital Trust I. The Trust Preferred Securities will mature on June 30, 2028, and are callable at par at the option of the Company after June 30, 2003. Proceeds of the issue were invested by AmeriServ Financial Capital Trust I in Junior Subordinated Debentures issued by AmeriServ Financial, Inc. Unamortized deferred issuance costs associated with the Trust Preferred Securities amounted to $318,000$302,000 as of December 31, 20072008 and are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet, and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the issue. The Trust Preferred securities are listed on NASDAQ under the symbol ASRVP. AmeriServ Financial Capital Trust I was deconsolidated in the first quarter of 2004 in accordance with FASB Interpretation #46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46(R)). The Company used $22.5 million of proceeds from a private placement of common stock to redeem Trust Preferred Securities in 2005 and 2004. The balance as of December 31, 20072008 and 20062007 was $13.1 million.
11. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Upon the occurrence of certain events, specifically a tax event or a capital treatment event,     Effective January 1, 2008, the Company may redeemadopted the provisions of FAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and financial liabilities. FAS No. 157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard applies whenever other standards require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value in whole,any new circumstances. The FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-1,Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which removed leasing transactions accounted for under FAS No. 13 and related guidance from the scope of FAS No. 157. The FASB also issued Staff Position No.157-2,Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157, which deferred the effective date of FAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
     FAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in part,measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels defined by FAS No. 157 hierarchy are as follows:
Level I:Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
Level II:Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
Level III:Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.
     Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Guaranteed Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures priorCompany obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may

52


include dealer quoted market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. This applies to June 30, 2028. A tax event meansall available for sale securities except U.S. Treasury and equity securities which are considered to be Level 1.
     Residential real estate loans held for sale are carried at fair value on a recurring basis. Residential real estate loans are valued based on quoted market prices from purchase commitments from market participants and are classified as Level 1.
     The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value as of December 31, 2008, by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by FAS No. 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis
     Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
                 
  Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
      Quoted Prices in Significant  
      Active Markets Other Significant
      for Observable Unobservable
      Identical Assets Inputs Inputs
  Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Assets:                
Available for sale securities $126,781  $17  $126,764  $ 
Loans held for sale  1,000   1,000       
Fair value swap asset  336      336    
Assets Measured on a Non-recurring Basis
     Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
                 
  Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using 
      Quoted Prices in  Significant    
      Active Markets  Other  Significant 
      for  Observable  Unobservable 
      Identical Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
  Total  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Assets:                
Impaired loans $857  $  $857  $ 
Other real estate owned  1,195      1,195    
     Loans considered impaired under FAS 114,“Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” as amended by FAS 118,“Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — Income Recognition and Disclosure,”are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the interest paid bycreditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the Companycontractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect (1) partial write-downs that are based on the subordinated debentures will no longer be deductible for federal income tax purposes. A capital treatment event means that the Trust Preferred Securities no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital for purposesobservable market price or current appraised value of the capital adequacy guidelinescollateral, or (2) the full charge-off of the Federal Reserve. Proceeds from any redemptioncarrying value. All of the subordinated debentures would cause mandatory redemptionCompany’s impaired loans are classified as level 2.
     Other real estate owned (OREO) is measured at fair value, less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the Trust Preferred Securities.assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell. Income and expenses from operations and changes in valuation allowance are included in the net expenses from OREO.
12. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
     
11.  DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
For the Company, as for most financial institutions, approximately 90% of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments. Many of the Company’s financial instruments, however, lack an available trading market characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Therefore, significant estimates and present value calculations were used by the Company for the purpose of this disclosure.

53


     
Estimated fair values have been determined by the Company using theindependent third party valuations that uses best available data (Level 2) and an estimation methodology (level 3) the Company believes is suitable for each category of financial instruments. Management believes that cash, cash equivalents, and loans and deposits with floating interest rates have estimated fair values which approximate the recorded book balances. The estimation methodologies used, the estimated fair values based off of FAS 157 measurements, and recorded book balances at December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, were as follows:
                 
  2007  2006 
  Estimated
  Recorded
  Estimated
  Recorded
 
  Fair Value  Book Balance  Fair Value  Book Balance 
  (In thousands) 
 
FINANCIAL ASSETS:                
Investment securities $163,319  $163,474  $196,603  $196,200 
Regulatory stock  7,204   7,204   5,355   5,355 
Net loans (including loans held for sale), net of allowance for loan loss  632,609   628,903   579,691   581,343 
Bank owned life insurance  32,864   32,864   32,256   32,256 
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:                
Deposits with no stated maturities $363,707  $363,707  $414,176  $414,176 
Deposits with stated maturities  347,361   346,732   326,752   327,579 
Short-term borrowings  72,210   72,210   49,091   49,091 
All other borrowings  25,811   22,990   16,181   14,031 


62


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
                 
  2008 2007
  ESTIMATED RECORDED ESTIMATED RECORDED
  FAIR VALUE BOOK BALANCE FAIR VALUE BOOK BALANCE
  (IN THOUSANDS)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:                
Investment securities $143,104  $142,675  $163,319  $163,474 
Regulatory stock  9,739   9,739   7,204   7,204 
Net loans (including loans held for sale), net of allowance for loan loss  701,066   698,198   632,609   628,903 
Accrued income receivable  3,735   3,735   4,032   4,032 
Bank owned life insurance  32,929   32,929   32,864   32,864 
Fair value swap asset  336   336       
                 
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:                
Deposits with no stated maturities $377,646  $377,646  $363,707  $363,707 
Deposits with stated maturities  320,201   317,310   347,361   346,732 
Short-term borrowings  119,920   119,920   72,210   72,210 
All other borrowings  31,472   26,943   25,811   22,990 
Accrued interest payable  4,062   4,062   4,961   4,961 
Fair value swap liability  336   336       
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)The fair value of investment securities is equal to the available quoted market price.
     The fair value of regulatory stock is equal to the current carrying value.
Financial instruments actively traded in a secondary market have been valued using quoted available market prices.     The net loan portfolio has been valued using a present value discounted cash flow. The discount rate used in these calculations is based upon the treasury yield curve adjusted for non-interest operating costs, credit loss, current market prices and assumed prepayment risk.
     The fair value of accrued income receivable is equal to the current carrying value.
Financial instruments     The fair value of bank owned life insurance is based upon the cash surrender value of the underlying policies and matches the book value.
     Deposits with stated maturities have been valued using a present value discounted cash flow with a discount rate approximating current market for similar assets and liabilities. Financial instrument liabilitiesDeposits with no stated maturities have an estimated fair value equal to both the amount payable on demand and the recorded book balance.
     The fair value of short-term borrowings is equal to the current carrying value.
     The fair value of other borrowed funds are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates are estimated using rates currently offered for similar instruments with similar remaining maturities.
     The fair value of accrued interest payable is equal to the current carrying value.
     The fair values of the fair value swaps used for interest rate risk management represents the amount the Company would have expected to receive or pay to terminate such agreements.
Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on these estimated fair values. The Company’s remaining assets and liabilities which are not considered financial instruments have not been valued differently than has been customary under historical cost accounting.
     
There is not a material difference between the notional amount and the estimated fair value of the off-balance sheet items which total $93.6$112.2 million at December 31, 2007,2008, and are primarily comprised of unfunded loan commitments which are generally priced at market at the time of funding.

54


13. INCOME TAXES
     
12.  INCOME TAXES
The expense (benefit) for income taxes is summarized below:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Current $116  $76  $(471)
Deferred  808   344   (5,431)
             
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations  924   420   (5,902)
Deferred income tax benefit from discontinued operations        (61)
             
Income tax expense (benefit) $924  $420  $(5,963)
             
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Current $121  $116  $76 
Deferred  1,349   808   344 
          
Income tax expense $1,470  $924  $420 
          
     
The reconciliation between the federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective consolidated income tax rate is as follows:
                         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
 
Income tax expense (benefit) based on federal statutory rate $1,346   34.0% $936   34.0% $(5,074)  (34.0)%
Tax exempt income  (506)  (12.8)  (478)  (17.4)  (424)  (2.8)
Reversal of valuation allowance        (100)  (3.6)      
Reversal of contingency reserves              (475)  (3.2)
Other  84   2.1   62   2.3   71   0.5 
                         
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations  924   23.3   420   15.3   (5,902)  (39.6)
Income tax benefit from discontinued operations              (61)  (33.9)
                         
Total expense (benefit) for income taxes $924   23.3% $420   15.3% $(5,963)  (39.5)%
                         


63


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
                         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  AMOUNT  RATE  AMOUNT  RATE  AMOUNT  RATE 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES) 
Income tax expense based on federal statutory rate $2,373   34.0% $1,346   34.0% $936   34.0%
Tax exempt income  (985)  (14.1)  (506)  (12.8)  (478)  (17.4)
Reversal of valuation allowance              (100)  (3.6)
Other  82   1.2   84   2.1   62   2.3 
                   
Total expense for income taxes $1,470   21.1% $924   23.3% $420   15.3%
                   
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, deferred taxes are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table highlights the major components comprising the deferred tax assets and liabilities for each of the periods presented:
        
 At December 31,         
 2007 2006  AT DECEMBER 31, 
 (In thousands)  2008 2007 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:         
Allowance for loan losses $2,465  $2,751  $3,029 $2,465 
Unfunded commitment reserve  135   112  167 135 
Premises and equipment  876   431  1,102 876 
Accrued pension obligation  100   108  1,165 100 
Unrealized investment security losses  403   1,675   403 
Net operating loss carryforwards  8,539   10,318  6,362 8,539 
Alternative minimum tax credits  1,132   994  1,301 1,132 
Other  332   274  396 332 
          
Total tax assets  13,982   16,663  13,522 13,982 
          
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES:         
Investment accretion  (26)  (26)  (36)  (26)
Lease accounting     (702)
Unrealized investment security gains  (676)  
Other  (206)  (98)  (159)  (206)
          
Total tax liabilities  (232)  (826)  (871)  (232)
          
Net deferred tax asset $13,750  $15,837  $12,651 $13,750 
          
As part of the 2006 tax expense, the Company did benefit from the elimination of a $100,000 income tax valuation allowance related to the deductibility of charitable contributions that management determined was no longer needed given the level of taxable income generated by the Company in 2006.     At December 31, 2007,2008, the Company had no valuation allowance established against its deferred tax assets as we believe the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income to fully utilize all net operating loss carryforwards and AMT tax credits.
     
The change in net deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:
         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Investmentwrite-ups due to FAS #115, charged to equity
 $(1,272) $(452)
Cumulative effect of adoption of change in accounting for pension obligation  (7)  1,657 
Reversal of valuation allowance     100 
Deferred provision for income taxes  (808)  (444)
         
Net (decrease) increase $(2,087) $861 
         
         
  YEAR ENDED 
  DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Investment write-ups due to FAS #115, charged to equity $(1,079) $(1,272)
Pension obligation of the defined benefit plan not yet recognized in income  1,329   (7)
Deferred provision for income taxes  (1,349)  (808)
       
Net decrease $(1,099) $(2,087)
       
     
The Company has alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1.1$1.3 million at December 31, 2007.2008. These credits have an indefinite carryforward period. The Company also has a $25.1an $18.7 million net operating loss carryforward that will begin to expire in the year 2024.

55


     
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement 109, effective January 1, 2007. FIN No. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and


64


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions should be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on the accounting for and disclosure of unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties. The adoption of FIN No. 48 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
13.  14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
PENSION PLANS:
     
The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering all employees who work at least 1,000 hours per year. The participants shall have a vested interest in their accrued benefit after five full years of service. The benefits of the plan are based upon the employee’s years of service and average annual earnings for the highest five consecutive calendar years during the final ten year period of employment. The Company’s funding policy has been to contribute annually an amount that will ensure that the total value of the plans assets will exceed the accumulated benefit obligation. Plan assets are primarily debt securities (including U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, corporate notes and bonds), listed common stocks (including shares of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. common stock valued at $576,000$414,000 and is limited to 10% of the plans assets), mutual funds, and short-term cash equivalent instruments. The following actuarial tables are based upon data provided by an independent third party as of December 31, 2008.
PENSION BENEFITS:
         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION:        
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $16,231  $15,410 
Service cost  926   927 
Interest cost  937   880 
Actuarial (gain) loss  (78)  109 
Special termination benefits     85 
Benefits paid  (1,215)  (1,180)
       
Benefit obligation at end of year  16,801   16,231 
       
         
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year  15,929   15,091 
Actual return on plan assets  (2,912)  918 
Employer contributions  1,400   1,100 
Benefits paid  (1,215)  (1,180)
       
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  13,202   15,929 
       
Funded status of the plan—under funded $(3,599) $(302)
       
         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
AMOUNTS NOT YET RECOGNIZED AS A COMPONENT OF NET PERIODIC PENSION COST:        
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of:        
Transition asset $17  $17 
Prior service cost  (4)  (4)
Net actuarial loss (gain)  3,711   (34)
       
Total $3,724  $(21)
       
         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
ACCUMULATED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:        
Accumulated benefit obligation $14,850  $14,254 
       


6556


     The weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
         
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007
  (PERCENTAGES)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:        
Discount rate  6.25%  6.00%
Salary scale  2.50   2.50 
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST:            
Service cost $926  $927  $882 
Interest cost  937   880   816 
Expected return on plan assets  (1,232)  (1,146)  (1,007)
Amortization of prior year service cost  4   4   4 
Amortization of transition asset  (17)  (17)  (17)
Recognized net actuarial loss due to special termination benefit     85    
Recognized net actuarial loss  355   370   398 
          
Net periodic pension cost $973  $1,103  $1,076 
          
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
PENSION BENEFITS:
         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands, except percentages) 
 
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION:        
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $15,410  $14,158 
Service cost  927   882 
Interest cost  880   816 
Actuarial loss  109   85 
Special termination benefits  85    
Benefits paid  (1,180)  (531)
         
Benefit obligation at end of year  16,231   15,410 
         
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year  15,091   12,956 
Actual return on plan assets  918   1,166 
Employer contributions  1,100   1,500 
Benefits paid  (1,180)  (531)
         
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  15,929   15,091 
         
Funded status of the plan — under funded $(302) $(319)
         
AMOUNTS NOT YET RECOGNIZED AS A COMPONENT OF NET PERIODIC PENSION COST:        
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of:        
Transition asset $17  $(109)
Prior service cost  (4)  (17)
Net actuarial (loss) gain  (34)  4,998 
         
Total $(21) $4,872 
         
         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
ACCUMULATED BENEFIT OBLIGATION:        
Accumulated benefit obligation $14,254  $13,486 
         
         
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (Percentages) 
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:        
Discount rate  6.00%  6.00%
Salary scale  2.50   2.50 


66


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST:            
Service cost $927  $882  $855 
Interest cost  880   816   806 
Expected return on plan assets  (1,146)  (1,007)  (924)
Amortization of prior year service cost  4   4   4 
Amortization of transition asset  (17)  (17)  (17)
Recognized net actuarial loss due to special termination benefit  85       
Recognized net actuarial loss  370   398   383 
             
Net periodic pension cost $1,103  $1,076  $1,107 
             
The estimated net loss, prior service cost and transition asset for the defined benefit pension plan that be will amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost over the next year are $341,000,$475,000, $11,000, and $(17,000), and $4,000, respectively.
     The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
            
 Year Ended December 31,             
 2007 2006 2005  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
 (Percenttages)  2008 2007 2006 
 (PERCENTAGES) 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:             
Discount rate  6.00%  6.00%  6.00%  6.00%  6.00%  6.00%
Expected return on plan assets  8.00   8.00   8.00  8.00 8.00 8.00 
Rate of compensation increase  2.50   2.50   2.50  2.50 2.50 2.50 
     
The Company has assumed an 8% long-term expected return on plan assets. This assumption was based upon the plan’s historical investment performance over a longer-term period of 15 years combined with the plan’s investment objective of balanced growth and income. Additionally, this assumption also incorporates a targeted range for equity securities of 50% to 60% of plan assets.
PLAN ASSETS:
     
The plan’s measurement date is December 31, 2007.2008. This plan’s asset allocations at December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, by asset category are as follows:
      
 2007 2006 
        
ASSET CATEGORY:         2008 2007
Equity securities  59%  64%  17%  59%
Debt securities and short-term investments  41   36  83 41 
          
Total  100%  100%  100%  100%
          
     
The investment strategy objective for the pension plan is a balance of growth and income. This objective seeks to develop a portfolio for acceptable levels of current income together with the opportunity for capital appreciation. The balanced growth and income objective reflects a relatively equal balance between equity and fixed income investments such as debt securities. The allocation between equity and fixed income assets may vary by a moderate degree but the plan typically targets a range of equity investments between 50% and 60% of the plan assets. This means that fixed income and cash investments typically approximate 40% to 50% of the plan assets. The investment manager deviated from this targeted range due to the volatility experienced in the equity markets in 2008. The plan is also able to invest in ASRV common stock up to a maximum level of 10% of the market value of the plan assets (at

67


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2007, 3.6%2008, 2.7% of the plan assets were invested in ASRV common stock). This asset mix is intended to ensure that there is a steady stream of cash from maturing investments to fund benefit payments.

57


CASH FLOWS:
     
The Bank presently expects that the contribution to be made to the Plan in 20082009 will be comparable with recent years of approximately $1.1$1.5 million.
ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS:
     
The following benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in thousands).
     
2009 $1,497 
2010  1,884 
2011  1,992 
2012  2,002 
2013  2,244 
Years 2014—2018  10,964 
     
2008 $1,493 
2009  1,467 
2010  1,847 
2011  1,965 
2012  1,972 
Years 2013 — 2017  11,175 
401(k) PLAN:
     
401(k) PLAN:
The Bank maintains a qualified 401(k) plan that allows for participation by Bank employees. Under the plan, employees may elect to make voluntary, pretax contributions to their accounts, and the Bank contributes 4% of salaries for union members who are in the plan. Contributions by the Bank charged to operations were $218,000$226,000 and $195,000$218,000 for the years ended December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The fair value of plan assets includes $293,000$266,000 pertaining to the value of the Company’s common stock that is held by the plan at December 31, 2007.2008.
     
Except for the above benefit plans, the Company has no significant additional exposure for any other post-retirement or post-employment benefits.
15. LEASE COMMITMENTS
14.  LEASE COMMITMENTS
     
The Company’s obligation for future minimum lease payments on operating leases at December 31, 2007,2008, is as follows:
        
 Future Minimum
  FUTURE MINIMUM
Year
 Lease Payments 
 (In thousands)  LEASE PAYMENTS
2008 $582 
YEAR  (IN THOUSANDS)
2009  520  $613 
2010  449   514 
2011  352   431 
2012  171   256 
2013 and thereafter  502 
2013  172 
2014 and thereafter  391 
     
In addition to the amounts set forth above, certain of the leases require payments by the Company for taxes, insurance, and maintenance. Rent expense included in total non-interest expense amounted to $514,000, $492,000 and $423,000, in 2008, 2007, and $388,000, in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.


68


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
15.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Bank incurs off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These risks derive from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments and standby letters of credit involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are obligations to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the loan agreement. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Because many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on acase-by-case basis. Collateral which secures these types of commitments is the same as for other types of secured lending such as accounts receivable, inventory, and fixed assets.
     
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including normal business activities, bond financings, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Letters of credit are issued both on an unsecured and secured basis. Collateral securing these types of transactions is similar to collateral securing the Bank’s commercial loans.

58


     
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by their contractual amounts. The Bank uses the same credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for all other lending. At December 31, 20072008 the Company had various outstanding commitments to extend credit approximating $112,192,000 and standby letters of credit of $13,064,000, compared to commitments to extend credit of $93,583,000 and standby letters of credit of $7,884,000 compared to commitments to extend credit of $125,863,000 and standby letters of credit of $8,472,000 at December 31, 2006.2007. Standby letters of credit had terms ranging from 1 to 4 years. Standby letters of credit of approximately $5.1$10.1 million were secured as of December 31, 20072008 and approximately $5.6$5.1 million at December 31, 2006.2007. The carrying amount of the liability for AmeriServ obligations related to standby letters of credit was $492,000 at December 31, 2008 and $398,000 at December 31, 2007 and $330,000 at December 31, 2006.2007.
     
Pursuant to its bylaws, the Company provides indemnification to its directors and officers against certain liabilities incurred as a result of their service on behalf of the Company. In connection with this indemnification obligation, the Company advancescan advance on behalf of covered individuals costs incurred in defending against certain claims. Additionally, the Company is also subject to a number of asserted and unasserted potential claims encountered in the normal course of business. In the opinion of the Company, neither the resolution of these claims nor the funding of these credit commitments will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operation or cash flows.
17. PREFERRED STOCK
16.  PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS
     On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (initially introduced as the Troubled Asset Relief Program or “TARP”) was enacted. On October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced its intention to inject capital into financial institutions under the TARP Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”). The CPP is a voluntary program designed to provide capital to healthy, well managed financial institutions in order to increase the availability of credit to businesses and individuals and help stabilize the U.S. financial system.
On September 27, 2005,December 19, 2008, the Company entered into agreementssold to the U.S. Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $21 million in cash 21,000 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D. In conjunction with institutional investors forthe purchase of these senior preferred shares, the U.S. Treasury also received a $10.3 million private placementwarrant to purchase up to 1,312,500 shares of the Company’s common stock. The agreements secured commitments from these investors to purchase 2.4 millionwarrant has a term of the Company’s shares10 years and is exercisable at aany time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $4.35 per share.
The Company contributed $1.0 million of the net proceeds to the capital of the Bank and $1.0 million of the net proceeds to the capital of the Trust Company. The Company used the remaining $7.2 million of net proceeds to redeem outstanding 8.45% Trust Preferred Securities, which resulted in annual pre-tax savings of approximately $600,000 in interest expense.
The successful completion of a $10.3 million private placement common stock offering provided the Company with the capital to facilitate a series of transactions in 2005 which were designed to significantly improve the Company’s interest rate risk position and position the Company for future increased earnings performance. These


69


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
transactions and their related impact on earnings were as follows: 1) The Company retired all remaining $100 million of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) convertible advances that had a cost of approximately 6.0% and a 2010 maturity. The Company incurred a $6.5 million pre-tax prepayment penalty to accomplish this transaction. 2) The Company terminated all interest rate hedges associated with the FHLB debt. The Company incurred a pre-tax termination fee of $5.8 million to eliminate these hedges on which the Company was a net payer. 3) The Company sold $112 million of investment securities to provide the cash needed at the bank for this FHLB debt and swap prepayment. The Company incurred a $2.6 million pre-tax loss on these investment security sales. 4) The Company redeemed at par $7.2 million of our high coupon trust preferred securities for which the Company incurred a $210,000 charge to write-off related unamortized issuance costs which is included within other expense.
On October 8, 2004, the Company announced that it entered into agreements with institutional investors on a $25.8 million private placement of common stock. The agreements secured commitments from investors to purchase 5.7 million shares at a price of $4.50$2.40 per share. The private placement$21 million in proceeds was funded in two tranches. The first tranche for 2.8 million shares, or $12.6 million, closed on October 8, 2004. The second tranche of 2.9 million shares, or $13.2 million, closed on December 13, 2004. The funding ofallocated to the second tranche was subject to shareholder approval, which was obtained on December 10, 2004.
The Company received net proceeds of $22.8 million after payment of offering expenses of $3.0 million and used the proceeds to strengthen its balance sheet. The specific actions included a $125 million reduction in high-cost, long-term borrowings from the FHLB, the repurchase or redemption of $15.3 million of outstanding AmeriServ TrustSeries D Preferred Stock and the closure of Standard Mortgage Corporation of Georgia. The Company incurred penalties in connection withwarrant based on their relative fair values at issuance (approximately $20.4 million was allocated to the prepayment of the advances, and expenses associated with reducing the amount of TrustSeries D Preferred Stock and approximately $600,000 to the closurewarrant). The difference between the initial value allocated to the Series D Preferred Stock of Standard Mortgage Corporationapproximately $20.4 million and the liquidation value of Georgia totaling approximately $10.0$21 million after-tax.will be charged to surplus over the first three years of the contract. Cumulative dividends on Series D Preferred Stock are payable quarterly at 5% through December 19, 2013 and at a rate of 9% thereafter. As a result of the decision by the Company to accept a preferred stock investment under the U.S. Treasury’s CPP for a period of three years the Company is no longer permitted to repurchase stock or declare and pay dividends on common stock without the consent of the U.S. Treasury.
18. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
     
17.  STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) #123(R) “Share-Based Payment” using the “modified perspective” method. Under this method, awards that are granted, modified, or settled after December 31, 2005, are measured and accounted for in accordance with FAS #123(R). As a result of this adoption the Company recognized $12,000$7,000 of pretax compensation expense for the year 2008, $12,000 in 2007 and $56,000 in 2006.
     
In 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a shareholder approved Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) authorizing the grant of options or restricted stock covering 800,000 shares of common stock. This Plan replaced the expired 1991 Stock Option Plan. Under the Plan, options or restricted stock can be granted (the Grant Date) to directors, officers, and employees that provide services to the Company and its affiliates, as selected by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The option price at which a stock option may be exercised shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value per share of common stock on the Grant Date. The maximum term of any option granted under the Plan cannot exceed 10 years. Generally, under the Plan on or after the first anniversary of the Grant Date, one-third of such options may be exercised. On or after the second anniversary of the Grant Date, two-thirds of such options may be exercised minus the aggregate number of such options previously exercised. On or after the third anniversary of the Grant Date, the remainder of the options may be exercised.


7059


     
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
A summary of the status of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan at December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005,2006, and changes during the years then ended is presented in the table and narrative following:
                        
 Year Ended December 31,                         
 2007 2006 2005  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
   Weighted
   Weighted
   Weighted
  2008 2007 2006
   Average
   Average
   Average
  WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
   Exercise
   Exercise
   Exercise
  AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
 Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price  EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE
 SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
Outstanding at beginning of year  247,208  $5.03   372,645  $5.33   393,848  $5.31  228,392 $5.09 247,208 $5.03 372,645 $5.33 
Granted  900   4.60   1,233   4.70   11,492   5.34  21,217 2.86 900 4.60 1,233 4.70 
Exercised  (5,834)  2.71   (21,667)  3.21   (3,352)  4.27     (5,834) 2.71  (21,667) 3.21 
Forfeited  (13,882)  5.02   (105,003)  6.46   (29,343)  5.23   (17,600) 4.86  (13,882) 5.02  (105,003) 6.46 
                    
Outstanding at end of year  228,392   5.09   247,208   5.03   372,645   5.33  232,009 4.90 228,392 5.09 247,208 5.03 
                    
Exercisable at end of year  227,381   5.09   223,314   4.93   303,653   5.25  217,564 5.04 227,381 5.09 223,314 4.93 
Weighted average fair value of options granted in current year     $2.59      $2.69      $2.99  $1.39 $2.59 $2.69 
     
A total of 227,381217,564 of the 228,392232,009 options outstanding at December 31, 2007,2008, have exercise prices between $2.31 and $6.10, with a weighted average exercise price of $5.09$5.04 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.973.31 years. Options outstanding at December 31, 20072008 reflect option ranges of: $2.31 to $3.49 totaling 7,50014,572 options which have a weighted average exercise price of $2.70$2.78 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 5.06.55 years; and $4.02 to $6.10 totaling 219,881202,992 options which have a weighted average exercise price of $5.17$5.20 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 3.943.07 years. All of these options are exercisable. The remaining 1,01114,445 options have exercise prices between $4.60$2.85 and $4.70,$4.60, with a weighted average exercise price of $4.64$2.90 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 8.849.22 years. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005.2006.
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
  2008 2007 2006
BLACK-SCHOLES ASSUMPTION RANGES            
             
Risk-free interest rate 2.76-3.34% 4.52% 4.70%
Expected lives in years 10 10 10
Expected volatility 33.28% 36.84% 37.22%
Expected dividend rate 0% 0% 0%
19. DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND COMMON STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
     
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
 
Black-Scholes Assumption Ranges
            
Risk-free interest rate  4.52%  4.70%  3.95-4.19%
Expected lives in years  10   10   10 
Expected volatility  36.84%  37.22%  37.34-38.63%
Expected dividend rate  0%  0%  0%
18.  DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND COMMON STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan (the Purchase Plan) provides each record holder of Common Stock with a simple and convenient method of purchasing additional shares without payment of any brokerage commissions, service charges or other similar expense. A participant in the Purchase Plan may purchase shares of Common Stock by electing either to (1) reinvest dividends on all of his or her shares of Common Stock (if applicable) or (2) make optional cash payments of not less than $10 and up to a maximum of $2,000 per month and continue to receive regular dividend payments on his or her other shares. A participant may withdraw from the Purchase Plan at any time.
     
In the case of purchases from AmeriServ Financial, Inc. of treasury or newly-issued shares of Common Stock, the average market price is determined by averaging the high and low sale price of the Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ on the relevant investment date. At December 31, 2007,2008, the Company issued 27,06937,534 shares and had 86,00048,000 unissued reserved shares available under the Purchase Plan. In the case of purchases of shares of


71


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Common Stock on the open market, the average market price will be the weighted average purchase price of shares purchased for the Purchase Plan in the market for the relevant investment date.
20. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
19.  INTANGIBLE ASSETS
     
The Company’s consolidated balance sheet shows both tangible assets (such as loans, buildings, and investments) and intangible assets (such as goodwill and core deposits). Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Instead such intangibles are evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually. Any resulting impairment would be reflected as a non-interest expense. Of the Company’s goodwill of $13.5 million, $9.5 million is allocated to the retail banking segment and $4 million relates to the West Chester Capital Advisors acquisition which is included in the trust segment. Goodwill in both of these segments was evaluated for impairment on its annual impairment evaluation date. The result of this evaluationthese evaluations indicated that the Company’s goodwill had no impairment. The remaining $4.0 million relates to the West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA) acquisition which will be evaluated for impairment in the first quarter of 2008. The Company’s only intangible asset, other than goodwill, is its core deposit intangible, which the Company currently believes has a remaining finite life of approximately 1.1 years.two months.

60


     
As of December 31, 2007,2008, the Company’s core deposit intangibles had an original cost of $17.6 million with accumulated amortization of $16.6$17.5 million. The weighted average amortization period of the Company’s core deposit intangibles at December 31, 2007,2008, is 1.10 years.two months. Estimated amortization expense for the next two years2009 is summarized as follows (in thousands):$108,000.
     
     
Year
 Expense
  (In thousands)
 
2008  865 
2009  108 
A reconciliation of the Company’s intangible asset balances for 20072008 and 20062007 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2008  2007 
  CORE DEPOSIT    
  INTANGIBLES  GOODWILL 
Balance January 1 $973  $1,838  $13,497  $9,544 
Addition due to WCCA           3,953 
Amortization expense  (865)  (865)      
             
Balance December 31 $108  $973  $13,497  $13,497 
             
                 
  At December 31, 
  Core Deposit
    
  Intangibles  Goodwill 
  2007  2006  2007  2006 
 
Balance January 1 $1,838  $2,703  $9,544  $9,544 
Addition due to WCCA        3,953    
Amortization expense  (865)  (865)      
                 
Balance December 31 $973  $1,838  $13,497  $9,544 
                 
21. DERIVATIVE HEDGING INSTRUMENTS
     
20.  DERIVATIVE HEDGING INSTRUMENTS
The Company can use various interest rate contracts, such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and swaptions to help manage interest rate and market valuation risk exposure, which is incurred in normal recurrent banking activities. The Company can use derivative instruments, primarily interest rate swaps, to manage interest rate risk and match the rates on certain assets by hedging the fair value of certain fixed rate debt, which converts the debt to variable rates and by hedging the cash flow variability associated with certain variable rate debt by converting the debt to fixed rates. During
     To accommodate a customer need and support the thirdCompany’s asset/liability positioning, we entered into an interest rate swap with the customer and Pittsburgh National Bank (PNC) in the fourth quarter of 2005,2008. This arrangement involves the increasing short-termexchange of interest payments based on the notional amounts. The Company entered into a floating rate loan and a fixed rate swap with our customer. Simultaneously, the Company entered into an offsetting fixed rate swap with PNC. In connection with each swap transaction, the Company agrees to pay interest to the customer on a notional amount at a variable interest rate environment causedand receive interest from the customer on the same notional amount at a fixed interest rate. At the same time, the Company agrees to exit all hedging transactions withpay PNC the counter partiessame fixed interest rate on the same notional amount and incurreceive the same variable interest rate on the same notional amount. This transaction allows the Company’s customer to effectively convert a pretax prepayment penaltyvariable rate loan to a fixed rate. Because the Company acts as an intermediary for its customer, changes in the fair value of $5.8 million.


72


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.the underlying derivative contracts offset each other and do not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations. The $144,000 fee the Company received on the transaction is being amortized into income over the term of the swap.
     
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table summarizes the interest rate swap transactions that impacted the Company’s 20052008 performance:
                         
                 Increase
 
        Fixed
  Floating
     (Decrease)
 
     Notional
  Rate
  Rate
  Repricing
  in Interest
 
2005
 Hedge Type  Amount  Received  Paid  Frequency  Expense 
 
   FAIR VALUE  $50,000,000   2.58%  2.70%  QUARTERLY  $175,000 
   FAIR VALUE   50,000,000   5.89   5.27   QUARTERLY   (148,000)
                         
                      $27,000 
                         
                             
                          INCREASE 
                          (DECREASE) IN 
  MATURITY      NOTIONAL  RATE  RATE  REPRICING  INTEREST 
START DATE DATE  HEDGE TYPE  AMOUNT  RECEIVED  PAID  FREQUENCY  EXPENSE 
12/12/08  12/24/13  FAIR VALUE $9,000,000   5.25%  4.40% MONTHLY $4,250 
12/12/08  12/24/13  FAIR VALUE  9,000,000   4.40   5.25  MONTHLY  (4,250)
                            
                          $ 
                            
     
The Company monitors and controls all derivative products with a comprehensive Board of Director approved hedging policy. This policy permits a total maximum notional amount outstanding of $500 million for interest rate swaps, interest rate caps/floors, and swaptions. All hedge transactions must be approved in advance by the Investment Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) of the Board of Directors. The Company had no interest rate swaps, caps or floors outstanding at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.2007.
22. SEGMENT RESULTS
     
21.  SEGMENT RESULTS
The financial performance of the Company is also monitored by an internal funds transfer pricing profitability measurement system which produces line of business results and key performance measures. The Company’s major business units include retail banking, commercial lending, trust, and investment/parent. The Company sold its remaining mortgage servicing rights in December 2004 and discontinued the operations of this non-core business (mortgage banking) in 2005(see Note 23). The reported results reflect the underlying economics of the business segments. Expenses for centrally provided services are allocated based upon the cost and estimated usage of those services. The businesses are match-funded and interest rate risk is centrally managed and accounted for within the investment/parent business segment. The key performance measure the Company focuses on for each business segment is net income contribution.
     
Retail banking includes the deposit-gathering branch franchise, lending to both individuals and small businesses, and financial services. Lending activities include residential mortgage loans, direct consumer loans, and small business commercial loans. Financial services include the sale of mutual funds, annuities, and insurance products. Commercial lending to businesses includes commercial

61


loans, and commercial real-estate loans. The trust segment has two primary business divisions, traditional trust and union collective investment funds. Traditional trust includes personal trust products and services such as personal portfolio investment management, estate planning and administration, custodial services and pre-need trusts. Also, institutional trust products and services such as 401(k) plans, defined benefit and defined contribution employee benefit plans, and individual retirement accounts are included in this segment. The union collective investment funds, namely the ERECT and BUILD Funds are designed to invest union pension dollars in construction projects that utilize union labor. The financial results of the recently acquired WCCA, an investment advisory firm, have been incorporated into the trust segment beginning March 7, 2007. The investment/parent includes the net results of investment securities and borrowing activities, general corporate expenses not allocated to the business segments, interest expense on guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and centralized interest rate risk management. Inter-segment revenues were not material.


73


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The contribution of the major business segments to the consolidated results of operations were as follows:
                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 
      COMMERCIAL      INVESTMENT/    
  RETAIL BANKING  LENDING  TRUST  PARENT  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Net interest income $17,373  $10,328  $85  $1,331  $29,117 
Provision for loan loss  585   2,340         2,925 
Non-interest income  8,253   865   7,511   (205)  16,424 
Non-interest expense  21,610   5,849   5,694   2,484   35,637 
                
Income (loss) before income taxes  3,431   3,004   1,902   (1,358)  6,979 
Income taxes (benefit)  691   705   649   (575)  1,470 
                
Net income (loss) $2,740  $2,299  $1,253  $(783) $5,509 
                
Total assets $350,864  $470,084  $3,306  $142,675  $966,929 
                
                    
 Year Ended December 31, 2007                     
 Retail
 Commercial
   Investment/
    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 
 Banking Lending Trust Parent Total  COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT/   
 (In thousands)  RETAIL BANKING LENDING TRUST PARENT TOTAL 
 (IN THOUSANDS) 
Net interest income $18,207  $9,199  $159  $(3,342) $24,223  $18,207 $9,199 $159 $(3,342) $24,223 
Provision for loan loss  60   240         300  60 240   300 
Non-interest income  6,312   588   7,728   79   14,707  6,312 588 7,728 79 14,707 
Non-interest expense  21,932   5,463   5,155   2,122   34,672  21,932 5,463 5,155 2,122 34,672 
                      
Income (loss) before income taxes  2,527   4,084   2,732   (5,385)  3,958  2,527 4,084 2,732  (5,385) 3,958 
Income taxes (benefit)  548   892   935   (1,451)  924  548 892 935  (1,451) 924 
                      
Net income (loss) $1,979  $3,192  $1,797  $(3,934) $3,034  $1,979 $3,192 $1,797 $(3,934) $3,034 
                      
Total assets $336,291  $402,222  $2,891  $163,474  $904,878  $336,291 $402,222 $2,891 $163,474 $904,878 
                      
                     
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 
      COMMERCIAL      INVESTMENT/    
  RETAIL BANKING  LENDING  TRUST  PARENT  TOTAL 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
Net interest income $18,822  $7,328  $343  $(2,015) $24,478 
Provision for loan loss  (34)  (91)        (125)
Non-interest income  5,732   540   6,521   48   12,841 
Non-interest expense  23,120   4,735   4,291   2,546   34,692 
                
Income (loss) before income taxes  1,468   3,224   2,573   (4,513)  2,752 
Income taxes (benefit)  265   626   875   (1,346)  420 
                
Net income (loss) $1,203  $2,598  $1,698  $(3,167) $2,332 
                
Total assets $357,083  $331,849  $2,716  $204,344  $895,992 
                
23. REGULATORY CAPITAL
     
                     
  Year Ended December 31, 2006 
  Retail
  Commercial
     Investment/
    
  Banking  Lending  Trust  Parent  Total 
  (In thousands) 
 
Net interest income $18,822  $7,328  $343  $(2,015) $24,478 
Provision for loan loss  (34)  (91)        (125)
Non-interest income  5,732   540   6,521   48   12,841 
Non-interest expense  23,120   4,735   4,291   2,546   34,692 
                     
Income (loss) before income taxes  1,468   3,224   2,573   (4,513)  2,752 
Income taxes (benefit)  265   626   875   (1,346)  420 
                     
Net income (loss) $1,203  $2,598  $1,698  $(3,167) $2,332 
                     
Total assets $357,083  $331,849  $2,716  $204,344  $895,992 
                     


74


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                             
  Year Ended December 31, 2005 
  Retail
  Commercial
  Mortgage
     Investment/
  Other Fee
    
  Banking  Lending  Banking  Trust  Parent  Based  Total 
  (In thousands) 
 
Net interest income $19,237  $5,538  $  $319  $(1,025) $43  $24,112 
Provision for loan loss  (56)  (119)              (175)
Non-interest income  5,607   442      6,129   (2,624)  655   10,209 
Non-interest expense  24,879   4,418      4,334   15,014   775   49,420 
                             
Income (loss) before income taxes  21   1,681      2,114   (18,663)  (77)  (14,924)
Income taxes (benefit)  (478)  309      719   (6,426)  (26)  (5,902)
                             
Income (loss) from continuing operations  499   1,372      1,395   (12,237)  (51)  (9,022)
Loss from discontinued operations        (119)           (119)
                             
Net income (loss) $499  $1,372  $(119) $1,395  $(12,237) $(51) $(9,141)
                             
Total assets $349,255  $293,997  $329  $2,890  $231,924  $1,781  $880,176 
                             
22.  REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company announced on February 21, 2006, that the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking had terminated the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that the Company had been operating under since February 28, 2003. The MOU was enacted to address prior deficiencies in asset quality, credit administration, and other matters. The Company’s successful actions to improve asset quality, strengthen capital, reduce interest rate risk, and enhance administrative procedures were the key factors that led to the termination of this regulatory enforcement action.
The Company is subject to various capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

7562


     
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier I capital to average assets. As of December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, the Federal Reserve categorized the Company as Well Capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. The Company believes that no conditions or events have occurred that would change this conclusion. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table.
                         
  AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008
                  TO BE WELL
          FOR CAPITAL CAPITALIZED UNDER
          ADEQUACY PROMPT CORRECTIVE
  ACTUAL PURPOSES ACTION PROVISIONS
  AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                        
Consolidated $120,035   15.90% $60,377   8.00% $75,472   10.00%
AmeriServ Financial Bank  92,333   12.56   58,813   8.00   73,517   10.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                        
Consolidated  110,633   14.66   30,189   4.00   45,283   6.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  83,143   11.31   29,407   4.00   44,110   6.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets)                        
Consolidated  110,633   12.15   36,414   4.00   45,518   5.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  83,143   9.30   35,751   4.00   44,688   5.00 
                       
 As of December 31, 2007                         
     To be Well
  AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007
   For Capital
 Capitalized Under
  TO BE WELL
   Adequacy
 Prompt Corrective
  FOR CAPITAL CAPITALIZED UNDER
 Actual Purposes Action Provisions  ADEQUACY PROMPT CORRECTIVE
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio  ACTUAL PURPOSES ACTION PROVISIONS
 (In thousands, Except Ratios)  AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                         
Consolidated $92,404   13.94% $53,017   8.00% $66,271   10.00% $92,404  13.94% $53,017  8.00% $66,271  10.00%
AmeriServ Financial Bank  83,612   12.75   52,458   8.00   65,573   10.00  83,612 12.75 52,458 8.00 65,573 10.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                         
Consolidated  84,754   12.79   26,508   4.00   39,762   6.00  84,754 12.79 26,508 4.00 39,762 6.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  75,962   11.58   26,229   4.00   39,344   6.00  75,962 11.58 26,229 4.00 39,344 6.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets)                         
Consolidated  84,754   9.74   34,811   4.00   43,514   5.00  84,754 9.74 34,811 4.00 43,514 5.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  75,962   8.84   34,391   4.00   42,989   5.00  75,962 8.84 34,391 4.00 42,989 5.00 
24. WEST CHESTER CAPITAL ADVISORS ACQUISITION
     
                         
  As of December 31, 2006 
        To be Well
 
     For Capital
  Capitalized Under
 
     Adequacy
  Prompt Corrective
 
  Actual  Purposes  Action Provisions 
  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio 
  (In thousands, Except Ratios) 
 
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                        
Consolidated $99,881   15.34% $52,097   8.00% $65,121   10.00%
AmeriServ Financial Bank  91,555   14.25   51,391   8.00   64,239   10.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)                        
Consolidated  91,737   14.09   26,048   4.00   39,073   6.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  83,520   13.00   25,696   4.00   38,543   6.00 
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets)                        
Consolidated  91,737   10.54   34,800   4.00   43,500   5.00 
AmeriServ Financial Bank  83,520   9.70   34,428   4.00   43,035   5.00 
23.  DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
As of December 28, 2004, SMC entered into an agreement to sell its remaining mortgage servicing rights. This action resulted in the closing of this non-core business which exposed theThe Company to greater balance sheet market risk and earnings volatility. SMC completed the transferacquisition of all files related to the servicing rights in the first half of 2005 and ceased operations as of June 30, 2005.


76


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
SMC’s operations had previously been reported as the Company’s mortgage banking segment. All results have been removed from the Company’s continuing operations for all periods presented. The results of SMC presented as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statement of Operations are as follows:
     
  Year Ended
 
  December 31,
 
  2005 
  (In thousands, Except
 
  Per Share Data) 
 
NET INTEREST INCOME $ 
Provision for loan losses   
     
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses   
NON-INTEREST INCOME    
Net mortgage servicing fees  50 
Other income  311 
     
Total Non-Interest Income  361 
     
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE    
Salaries and employee benefits  240 
Net occupancy expense  208 
Equipment expense  49 
Professional fees  22 
Supplies, postage, and freight  23 
Miscellaneous taxes and insurance  (1)
     
Total Non-Interest Expense  541 
     
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES  (180)
Benefit for income taxes  (61)
     
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS $(119)
     
PER COMMON SHARE DATA FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:    
Basic:    
Net loss $(0.01)
Average number of shares outstanding  20,340 
Diluted:    
Net loss $(0.01)
Average number of shares outstanding  20,340 
24.  WEST CHESTER CAPITAL ADVISORS ACQUISITION
The Company announced on January 22, 2007, that it had signed a Definitive Agreement to acquire West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA) of West Chester, Pennsylvania.Pennsylvania on March 7, 2007. WCCA is registered investment advisor with expertiseformed in large cap stocks,1994 and at December 31, 20072008 had $137$82 million in assets under management. WCCA was formed in 1994.
The acquisition was completed on March 7, 2007. WCCA is a wholly owned subsidiary of AmeriServ Financial Bank.
     Because the acquisition was a cash transaction, the Company did not issue any stock to execute the purchase. Therefore, there was no ownership dilution to AmeriServ stockholders, and as expected the transaction was accretive to earnings in 2007.stockholders. The purchase price paid by AmeriServ Financial Bank to the Sellers for all the


77


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
capital stock of WCCA was $4,000,000. This amount consisted of: (a) $2,200,000 paid at closing in immediately available funds, and (b) a deferred payment of up to $1,800,000 to be paid as follows: (A) up to $1,000,000 payable 30 months after closing, and (B) up to $800,000 payable 48 months after closing, in each case, subject to proportionate reduction if revenues of WCCA as of those dates is less than $1,360,000.

63


25. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
     
25.  PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The parent company functions primarily as a coordinating and servicing unit for all subsidiary entities. Provided services include general management, accounting and taxes, loan review, internal auditing, investment advisory, marketing, insurance risk management, general corporate services, and financial and strategic planning. The following financial information relates only to the parent company operations:
BALANCE SHEETS
         
  AT DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
ASSETS        
Cash $106  $100 
Short-term investments in money market funds  14,202   3,053 
Investment securities available for sale  8,813   1,007 
Equity investment in banking subsidiary  97,434   93,427 
Equity investment in non-banking subsidiaries  4,938   4,720 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture issuance costs  302   318 
Other assets  1,527   1,508 
       
TOTAL ASSETS $127,322  $104,133 
       
         
LIABILITIES        
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures $13,085  $13,085 
Other liabilities  985   754 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES  14,070   13,839 
       
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Total stockholders’ equity  113,252   90,294 
       
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $127,322  $104,133 
       
         
  At December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
ASSETS        
Cash $100  $100 
Investment securities available for sale  4,060   3,112 
Equity investment in banking subsidiaries  93,427   88,468 
Equity investment in non-banking subsidiaries  4,720   4,645 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture issuance costs  318   334 
Other assets  1,508   1,717 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $104,133  $98,376 
         
LIABILITIES        
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures $13,085  $13,085 
Other liabilities  754   607 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES  13,839   13,692 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Total stockholders’ equity  90,294   84,684 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $104,133  $98,376 
         
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
INCOME            
Inter-entity management and other fees $2,254  $2,363  $2,351 
Dividends from banking subsidiary  6,000       
Dividends from non-banking subsidiaries  1,250   1,580   1,722 
Interest and dividend income  292   167   120 
          
TOTAL INCOME  9,796   4,110   4,193 
          
             
EXPENSE            
Interest expense  1,121   1,121   1,121 
Salaries and employee benefits  2,004   1,910   2,008 
Other expense  1,336   1,223   1,184 
          
TOTAL EXPENSE  4,461   4,254   4,313 
          
             
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES  5,335   (144)  (120)
Benefit for income taxes  651   583   640 
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  (477)  2,595   1,812 
          
NET INCOME $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
          


7864


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
INCOME            
Inter-entity management and other fees $2,363  $2,351  $2,411 
Dividends from non-banking subsidiaries  1,580   1,722   1,186 
Interest and dividend income  167   120   94 
             
TOTAL INCOME  4,110   4,193   3,691 
             
EXPENSE            
Interest expense  1,121   1,121   1,659 
Salaries and employee benefits  1,910   2,008   1,834 
Dividends downstreamed to banking subsidiary        1,000 
Dividends downstreamed to non-banking subsidiaries        1,000 
Other expense  1,223   1,184   1,532 
             
TOTAL EXPENSE  4,254   4,313   7,025 
             
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES  (144)  (120)  (3,334)
Benefit for income taxes  583   640   837 
Equity in undistributed gains (losses) of subsidiaries  2,595   1,812   (6,644)
             
NET INCOME (LOSS) $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141)
             


79


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
             
  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2008  2007  2006 
  (IN THOUSANDS) 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
Net income $5,509  $3,034  $2,332 
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:            
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  477   (2,595)  (1,812)
Other — net  1,176   1,445   1,043 
          
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES  7,162   1,884   1,563 
          
             
INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
Purchase of investment securities — available for sale  (9,720)  (999)  (3,112)
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities — available for sale  2,008   3,053    
Capital contribution to banking subsidiary  (5,000)      
          
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (12,712)  2,054   (3,112)
          
             
FINANCING ACTIVITIES            
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  99   131   173 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock  21,000       
Treasury stock, purchased at cost  (2,835)      
Common stock dividends paid  (543)      
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures dividends paid  (1,016)  (1,016)  (1,016)
          
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES  16,705   (885)  (843)
          
             
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  11,155   3,053   (2,392)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1  3,153   100   2,492 
          
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31 $14,308  $3,153  $100 
          
     
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
Net income (loss) $3,034  $2,332  $(9,141)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:            
Equity in undistributed (gains) losses of subsidiaries  (2,595)  (1,812)  6,644 
Other — net  1,445   1,043   1,422 
             
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES  1,884   1,563   (1,075)
             
INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
Purchase of short-term investments — available for sale  (999)  (3,112)   
             
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (999)  (3,112)   
             
FINANCING ACTIVITIES            
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  131   173   133 
Proceeds from private offering, net of issuance costs        8,818 
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures dividends paid  (1,016)  (1,016)  (1,546)
Retirement of Trust Preferred Securities        (7,200)
             
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  (885)  (843)  205 
             
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS     (2,392)  (870)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT JANUARY 1  100   2,492   3,362 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT DECEMBER 31 $100  $100  $2,492 
             
The ability of the subsidiary bank to upstream cash to the parent company is restricted by regulations. Federal law prevents the parent company from borrowing from its subsidiary bank unless the loans are secured by specified assets. Further, such secured loans are limited in amount to ten percent of the subsidiary bank’s capital and surplus. In addition, the Bank is subject to legal limitations on the amount of dividends that can be paid to its shareholder. The dividend limitation generally restricts dividend payments to a bank’s retained net income for the current and preceding two calendar years. Cash may also be upstreamed to the parent company by the subsidiaries as an inter-entity management fee. At December 31, 2007,2008, the subsidiary bank was not permitted to upstream anyan additional $3,899,000 in cash dividends to the parent company. However, as of January 1, 2008, the subsidiary bank had $4.6 million of cash available for dividend upstream to the parent. The subsidiary bank had a combined $90,717,000$102,984,000 of restricted surplus and retained earnings at December 31, 2007.


80


2008.
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
NOTES TO26. SELECTED QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)DATA
     
26.  SELECTED QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly consolidated financial data regarding the Company:
                 
  2007 Quarter Ended 
  Dec. 31  Sept. 30  June 30  March 31 
  (In thousands, except per share data) 
 
Interest income $12,442  $12,454  $12,308  $12,175 
Interest expense  6,209   6,432   6,295   6,220 
                 
Net interest income  6,233   6,022   6,013   5,955 
Provision for loan losses  150   150       
                 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  6,083   5,872   6,013   5,955 
Non-interest income  3,860   4,022   3,592   3,233 
Non-interest expense  8,704   8,773   8,522   8,673 
                 
Income before income taxes  1,239   1,121   1,083   515 
Provision for income taxes  315   247   275   87 
                 
Net income $924  $874  $808  $428 
                 
Basic earnings per common share  0.04   0.04   0.04   0.02 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.04   0.04   0.04   0.02 
Cash dividends declared per common share  0.00   0.00   0.00   0.00 
                
 2006 Quarter Ended                 
 Dec. 31 Sept. 30 June 30 March 31  2008 QUARTER ENDED 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  DEC. 31 SEPT. 30 JUNE 30 MARCH 31 
 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 
Interest income $12,077  $11,895  $11,414  $11,179  $12,355 $11,732 $11,450 $12,282 
Interest expense  6,181   5,796   5,223   4,887  4,170 4,501 4,484 5,547 
                  
Net interest income  5,896   6,099   6,191   6,292  8,185 7,231 6,966 6,735 
Provision for loan losses  (75)     (50)    625 775 1,375 150 
                  
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  5,971   6,099   6,241   6,292  7,560 6,456 5,591 6,585 
Non-interest income  3,084   3,247   3,268   3,242  3,476 3,767 5,343 3,838 
Non-interest expense  8,493   8,564   8,777   8,858  9,049 8,784 9,025 8,779 
                  
Income before income taxes  562   782   732   676  1,987 1,439 1,909 1,644 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (19)  139   164   136 
Provision for income taxes 372 290 393 415 
                  
Net income $581  $643  $568  $540  $1,615 $1,149 $1,516 $1,229 
                  
Basic earnings per common share  0.03   0.03   0.03   0.02  0.07 0.05 0.07 0.06 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.03   0.03   0.03   0.02  0.07 0.05 0.07 0.06 
Cash dividends declared per common share  0.00   0.00   0.00   0.00  0.025 0.00 0.00 0.00 


8165


                 
  2007 QUARTER ENDED 
  DEC. 31  SEPT. 30  JUNE 30  MARCH 31 
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 
Interest income $12,442  $12,454  $12,308  $12,175 
Interest expense  6,209   6,432   6,295   6,220 
             
Net interest income  6,233   6,022   6,013   5,955 
Provision for loan losses  150   150       
             
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  6,083   5,872   6,013   5,955 
Non-interest income  3,860   4,022   3,592   3,233 
Non-interest expense  8,704   8,773   8,522   8,673 
             
Income before income taxes  1,239   1,121   1,083   515 
Provision for income taxes  315   247   275   87 
             
Net income $924  $874  $808  $428 
             
Basic earnings per common share  0.04   0.04   0.04   0.02 
Diluted earnings per common share  0.04   0.04   0.04   0.02 
Cash dividends declared per common share  0.00   0.00   0.00   0.00 

66


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Audit Committee

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20072008 and 2006,2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years then ended. We also have audited AmeriServ Financial Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as ofin the period ended December 31, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management is responsible for these2008. These consolidated financial statements for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessmentare the responsibility of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanyingReport on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. The accompanying consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005, were audited by other auditors whose report thereon dated March 6, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatementmisstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 2, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements.
/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
Wexford, PA
March 2, 2009

67


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Audit Committee
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
We have audited AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements include examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, AmeriServ Financial, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2008, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Audit Report of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and our report dated March 2, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
Wexford, PA

March 6, 20082, 2009


8268


REPORT ON MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
     
AmeriServ Financial, Inc. is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements and notes included in this annual report have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.
     
We, as management of AmeriServ Financial, Inc., are responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The system of internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits. Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as they are identified. Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.
     
Management assessed the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2008, in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting as described in “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concludes that, as of December 31, 2007,2008, its system of internal control over financial reporting is effective and meets the criteria of the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”. S.R. Snodgrass A.C., independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
   
/s/ ALLAN R. DENNISON

/s/ JEFFREY A. STOPKO
Allan R. Dennison
Jeffrey A. Stopko
President &
Senior Vice President &
Chief Executive Officer 
/s/  JEFFREY A. STOPKO

Jeffrey A. Stopko
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
Johnstown, PA

February 21, 200819, 2009


8369


STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
February 21, 200819, 2009
To the Stockholders and

Board of Directors of

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
     
Management of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries have prepared the consolidated financial statements and other information in the Annual Report andForm 10-K in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and are responsible for its accuracy.
     
In meeting its responsibility, management relies on internal accounting and related control systems, which include selection and training of qualified personnel, establishment and communication of accounting and administrative policies and procedures, appropriate segregation of responsibilities, and programs of internal audit. These systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance that financial records are reliable for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets and that assets are safeguarded against unauthorized use or disposition. Such assurance cannot be absolute because of inherent limitations in any internal control system.
     
Management also recognizes its responsibility to foster a climate in which Company affairs are conducted with the highest ethical standards. The Company’s Code of Conduct, furnished to each employee and director, addresses the importance of open internal communications, potential conflicts of interest, compliance with applicable laws, including those related to financial disclosure, the confidentiality of proprietary information, and other items. There is an ongoing program to assess compliance with these policies.
     
The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors consists solely of outside directors. The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and the independent auditors to discuss audit, financial reporting, and related matters. S.R. Snodgrass A.C. and the Company’s internal auditors have direct access to the Audit Committee.
   
/s/ ALLAN R. DENNISON

/s/ JEFFREY A. STOPKO
Allan R. Dennison
Jeffrey A. Stopko
President &
Senior Vice President &
Chief Executive Officer 
/s/  JEFFREY A. STOPKO

Jeffrey A. Stopko
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer


8470


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING FIRMAND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
     None.
To the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
of AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
Johnstown, PennsylvaniaITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
     
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of operations of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 6, 2008


85


ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.As of December 31, 2007,2008, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, on the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRules Rule 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2007.2008.
     
Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed and submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the third quarter, AmeriServ Financial Inc. completed a data processing conversion. As a result there were changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. While the controls are similar in nature, modifications have been made to confirm to the specifications of the new system. Through evaluation and comparison of these controls, we have determined that the change has not materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
     
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined inRule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20072008 is included in Item 8.
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
     None.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
     
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information required by this section relativerelating to Directors of the Registrant is presented in the “Election of ASRV Directors” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
     
Information required by this section is presented in the “Compensation Paid to Executive Officers” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
     
Information required by this section is presented in the “Security Ownership of Management” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


86


ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
     
Information required by this section is presented in the “Transactions with Management” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

71


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
     
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by this section is presented in the “Audit Committee Report” section of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
PART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ONFORM 8-K
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED:
     
The consolidated financial statements listed below are from the 2007this 2008 Form 10-K and Part II — Item 8. Page references are to saidthis Form 10-K.10-K.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
     
AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries    
36
Consolidated Statements of Operations,37
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income,38
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity,39
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,40
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,  41 
42
43
44
45
46
  8267 
  8369 
  8470 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES:
     
These schedules are not required or are not applicable under Securities and Exchange Commission accounting regulations and therefore have been omitted.


8772


EXHIBITS:
     
The exhibits listed below are filed herewith or to other filings.
       
Exhibit
   Prior Filing or Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
Page Number Herein
 
 3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended through January 5, 2005. Exhibit 3.1 to 2004Form 10-K Filed on March 10, 2005
 3.2 Bylaws, as amended and restated on January 26, 2005. Exhibit 3.2 to January 26, 2005Form 8-K Filed on January 26, 2005
 10.3 Agreement, dated May 24, 2002, between AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Jeffrey A. Stopko. Exhibit 10.1 toForm 10-Q Filed August 14, 2002
 10.5 2001 Stock Incentive Plan dated February 23, 2001. 2000 Proxy Statement Filed March 16, 2001
 10.6 Agreement, dated December 1, 1994, between AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Ronald W. Virag. Exhibit 10.6 to 2000Form 10-K Filed March 21, 2001
 10.7 Agreement, dated February 1, 2004, between AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Allan R. Dennison, as amended on January 24, 2008 Exhibit 10.7 to 2007Form 10-K Filed March 6, 2008
 10.8 Agreement, dated May 24, 2002, between AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Dan L. Hummel Exhibit 10.8 to 2004Form 10-K Filed March 10, 2005
 21  Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Below
 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Below
 23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Below
 31.1 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14 (a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Below
 31.2 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14 (a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Below
 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Below
 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Below
EXHIBITPRIOR FILING OR EXHIBIT
NUMBERDESCRIPTIONPAGE NUMBER HEREIN
3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended through January 5, 2005.Exhibit 3.1 to 2004 Form 10-K Filed on March 10, 2005
3.2Bylaws, as amended and restated on January 26, 2005.Exhibit 3.2 to January 26, 2005 Form 8-K Filed on January 26, 2005
3.3Certificate of Designation of Rights of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D.Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K Filed December 22, 2008
4.1Warrant, dated December 19, 2008, to Purchase 1,312,500 shares of common stock, par value $2.50 per share, of AmeriServ Financial, Inc.Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K Filed December 22, 2008
10.1Agreement, dated February 1, 2004, between AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Allan R. Dennison, as amended on January 24, 2008Exhibit 10.7 to 2007 Form 10-K Filed March 6, 2008
10.2Agreement, dated May 24, 2002, between AmeriServ Financial, Inc. and Dan L. HummelExhibit 10.8 to 2004 Form 10-K Filed March 10, 2005
21.1Subsidiaries of the Registrant.Below
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmBelow
31.1Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Below
31.2Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Below
32.1Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Below
32.2Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Below


8873


SIGNATURES
     
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
(Registrant)
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
(Registrant)
 By:  /s/ Allan R. Dennison
Allan R. Dennison 
President & CEO 
Allan R. Dennison
President & CEO
Date: February 21, 200819, 2009
     
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 21, 2008:19, 2009:
/s/ Craig G. Ford
 
Craig G. Ford
Chairman
Director
/s/ Allan R. Dennison
Allan R. Dennison
President, CEO & Director/s/ Jeffrey A. Stopko
Jeffrey A. Stopko
SVP & CFO 
/s/ J. Michael Adams, Jr.
J. Michael Adams, Jr.
Director/s/ Margaret A. O’Malley
Margaret A. O’Malley
Director 
/s/ Edward J. Cernic, Sr.
Edward J. Cernic, Sr.
Director/s/ Very Rev. Christian R. Oravec
Very Rev. Christian R. Oravec
Director 
/s/ Daniel R. DeVos
Daniel R. DeVos
Director/s/ Mark E. Pasquerilla
Mark E. Pasquerilla
Director 
/s/ James C. Dewar
James C. Dewar
Director/s/ Howard M. Picking, III
Howard M. Picking, III
Director 
/s/ Bruce E. Duke, III
Bruce E. Duke, III, M.D.
Director/s/ Sara A. Sargent
Sara A. Sargent
Director 
/s/ James M. Edwards, Sr.
James M. Edwards, Sr.
Director/s/ Thomas C. Slater
Thomas C. Slater
Director 
/s/ Kim W. Kunkle
Kim W. Kunkle
Director/s/ Nedret Vidinli
Nedret Vidinli
Director 
     
   
/s/  Craig G. Ford
Craig G. Ford
 ChairmanDirector
/s/ Allan R. DennisonRobert L. Wise
Allan R. Dennison
President, CEO & Director
/s/  J. Michael Adams, Jr.
J. Michael Adams, Jr.Robert L. Wise
 Director
/s/  Edward J. Cernic, Sr.
Edward J. Cernic, Sr.
Director
/s/  Daniel R. DeVos
Daniel R. DeVos
Director
/s/  James C. Dewar
James C. Dewar
Director
/s/  Bruce E. Duke, III, M.D.
Bruce E. Duke, III, M.D.
Director
/s/  James M. Edwards, Sr.
James M. Edwards, Sr.
Director
/s/  Kim W. Kunkle
Kim W. Kunkle
Director
/s/  Jeffrey A. Stopko
Jeffrey A. Stopko
SVP & CFO
/s/  Margaret A. O’Malley
Margaret A. O’Malley
Director


8974


AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
     
AMERISERV FINANCIAL
/s/  Very Rev. Christian R. Oravec
Very Rev. Christian R. Oravec
Director
   REMOTE ATM
/s/  Mark E. PasquerillaBANK OFFICE LOCATIONS
Mark E. Pasquerilla
Director
   
/s/  Howard M. Picking, III
Howard M. Picking, III
Director
/s/  Sara A. Sargent
Sara A. Sargent
Director
/s/  Thomas C. Slater
Thomas C. Slater
Director
/s/  Robert L. Wise
Robert L. Wise
DirectorBANKING LOCATIONS


90


AMERISERV FINANCIAL*   Main Office Downtown
BANK
OFFICE LOCATIONS
*  Main Office Downtown
216 Franklin Street
P.O.
     PO Box 520

Johnstown, PA15907-0520
     1-800-837-BANK (2265)
1-800-837-BANK(2265)
+* Westmont Office
†* Westmont Office
110 Plaza Drive

Johnstown, PA15905-1211
+* University Heights Office
†* University Heights Office
1404 Eisenhower Boulevard

Johnstown, PA15904-3218
*  Eighth Ward Office
*   Eighth Ward Office
1059 Franklin Street

Johnstown, PA15905-4303
*  West End Office
*   West End Office
163 Fairfield Avenue

Johnstown, PA15906-2347
*  Carrolltown Office
*   Carrolltown Office
101 South Main Street

Carrolltown, PA15722-0507
*  Northern Cambria Office
*   Northern Cambria Office
4206 Crawford Avenue Suite 1

Northern Cambria, PA
15714-1342
*  Ebensburg Office
104 South Center Street
Ebensburg, PA15931-0209
+* Lovell Park Office
†* Lovell Park Office
179 Lovell Avenue

Ebensburg, PA15931-0418
*  Nanty Glo Office
*   Nanty Glo Office
1383 Shoemaker Street

Nanty Glo, PA15943-1254
+* Galleria Mall Office
†* Galleria Mall Office
500 Galleria Drive Suite 100

Johnstown, PA15904-8911
*  Seward Office
*  Seward Office
     1 Roadway Plaza
6858 Route 711 Suite 1
One
Seward, PA15954-9501
*  Windber Office
*   Windber Office
1501 Somerset Avenue

Windber, PA15963-1745
     
Central City Office


91


104 Sunshine Avenue

Central City, PA15926-1129
*  Somerset Office
*   Somerset Office
108 W. Main Street

Somerset, PA15501-2035
*  Derry Office
*   Derry Office
112 South Chestnut Street

Derry, PA15627-1938
*  South Atherton Office
*   South Atherton Office
734 South Atherton Street

State College, PA16801-4628
*  Pittsburgh Office
*   Pittsburgh Office
60 Boulevard of the Allies

Suite 100

Pittsburgh, PA15222-1232
*  Benner Pike Office
*   Benner Pike Office
763 Benner Pike

State College, PA16801-7313
*= 24-Hour ATM Banking
* = 24-Hour ATM Banking
      Available
†= Seven Day a Week Banking
Available
+= Seven Day a Week Banking
Available
REMOTE ATM
BANKING LOCATIONS
East HillsDrive-up,
1213 Scalp Avenue, Johnstown

Main Office, 216 Franklin Street,
     Johnstown

The Galleria, Johnstown
Gogas
Goga’s Service Station, Cairnbrook
AMERISERV RESIDENTIAL
LENDING LOCATIONS
GreensburgMain Office
Oakley Park II, 4963 Route 30
Greensburg, Downtown
216 Franklin Street
PO Box 520
Johnstown, PA15601-9560
15907-0520
Altoona Office

87 Logan Boulevard

Altoona, PA16602-3123
Mt. Nittany Mortgage Company

2300 South Atherton Street

State College, PA16801-7613
Pittsburgh Loan Center

300 Penn Center Boulevard

Suite 613

Pittsburgh, PA15235-5507



9275


SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
SECURITIES MARKETS
     
SECURITIES MARKETS
AmeriServ Financial, Inc. Common Stock is publicly traded and quoted on the NASDAQ National Market System. The common stock is traded under the symbol of “ASRV.” The listed market makers for the stock are:

Citigroup SmithBarney

969 Eisenhower Boulevard

Oak Ridge East

Johnstown, PA 15904

Telephone:(814) 266-7900
Stifel Nicolaus

18 Columbia Turnpike

Florham Park, NJ07932-2290

Telephone:(973) 549-4217
UBS Financial Services, Inc.

1407 Eisenhower Boulevard

Johnstown, PA 15904

Telephone:(814) 269-9211
Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc.

787 Seventh Avenue

Equitable Bldg — 4th Floor

New York, NY 10019

Telephone:(800) 966-1559
Knight Capital Group, Inc.

545 Washington Boulevard

Jersey City, NJ 07310

Telephone:(800) 544-7508
Janney Montgomery Scott, LLC

1801 Market Street, 8th8th Floor

Philadelphia, PA19103-1675

Telephone:(215) 665-6000
Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P.

919 Third Avenue

6th Floor

New York, NY 10022

Telephone:(800) 635-6860


CORPORATE OFFICES
     
CORPORATE OFFICES
The corporate offices of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. are located at 216 Franklin Street, Johnstown, PA 15901. Mailing address:
P.O. Box 430

Johnstown, PA15907-0430

(814) 533-5300
AGENTS
     
The transfer agent and registrar for AmeriServ Financial, Inc.’s common stock is:
Computershare Investor Services

P O Box 43010
43078
Providence, RI02940-3023
02940-3078
Shareholder Inquiries:1-800-730-4001

Internet Address:http://www. Computershare.comwww.Computershare.com
INFORMATION
     
Analysts, investors, shareholders, and others seeking financial data about AmeriServ Financial, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries’ annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements,10-K,10-Q,8-K, 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, and call reports — are asked to contact Jeffrey A. Stopko, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer at(814) 533-5310 or bye-mail atJStopko@AMERISERVFINANCIAL.com. The Company also maintains a website (www.AmeriServFinancial.com) that makes available, free of charge, such reports and proxy statements and other current financial information, such as press releases and SEC documents, as well as the corporate governance documents under the Investor Relations tab on the Company’s website.


9376