UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended May 25, 200631, 2007
A Wisconsin corporation
IRS Employer Identification No. 39-1139844
Commission File No. 1-12609
We have one class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: our Common Stock, $1 par value, which is registered on the New York Stock Exchange.
We do not have any securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
We are not a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in rule 405 of the Securities Act).
We are required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. We have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K iscontained in our definitive proxy statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
We are an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
We are not a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of November 24, 2005 and August 4,23, 2006 was $523,986,379.35 and $437,225,176.96, respectively.$522,367,369.71. This value includes all shares of our Common Stock, except for shares beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers listed in Part I below.
As of November 24, 2005 and August 4, 2006,10, 2007, there were 21,352,968 and 21,425,34121,539,284 shares of our Common Stock, $1 par value, and 9,090,471 and 8,953,6918,889,588 shares of our Class B Common Stock, $1 par value, outstanding, respectively.outstanding.
Portions of our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20062007 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the Commission under Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year, and, upon such filing, will be incorporated by reference into Part III to the extent indicated therein.therein upon such filing.
Certain matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the accompanying annual report to shareholders, particularly in the Shareholders’ Letter and Management’s Discussion and Analysis, are “forward-looking statements” intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may generally be identified as such because the context of such statements will include words such as we “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect” or words of similar import. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause results to differ materially from those expected, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) the availability, in terms of both quantity and audience appeal, of motion pictures for our theatre division, as well as other industry dynamics such as the maintenance of a suitable window between the date such motion pictures are released in theatres and the date they are released to other distribution channels; (2) the effects of increasing depreciation expenses and preopening and start-up costs due to the capital intensive nature of our businesses; (3) the effects of adverse economic conditions in our markets, particularly with respect to our hotels and resorts division; (4) the effects of adverse weather conditions, particularly during the winter in the Midwest and in our other markets; (5) the effects on our occupancy and room rates from the relative industry supply of available rooms at comparable lodging facilities in our markets; (6) the effects of competitive conditions in our markets; (7) our ability to identify properties to acquire, develop and/or manage and continuing availability of funds for such development; and (8) the adverse impact on business and consumer spending on travel, leisure and entertainment resulting from terrorist attacks in the United States, the United States’ responses thereto and subsequent hostilities.hostilities; and (9) the successful integration of the Cinema Entertainment Corporation theatres into our theatre circuit. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made herein are made only as of the date of this Form 10-K and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
| Item 1. | Business. |
We are engaged primarily in two business segments: movie theatres and hotels and resorts.
As of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, our theatre operations included 4550 movie theatres with 504608 screens throughout Wisconsin, Ohio, Illinois, Minnesota, North Dakota and Minnesota,Iowa, including fourtwo movie theatres with 4020 screens in Illinois and Wisconsin owned by third parties but managed by us. We also operate a family entertainment center,Funset Boulevard, that is adjacent to one of our theatres in Appleton, Wisconsin.
As of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, our hotels and resorts operations included eight owned and operated hotels and resorts in Wisconsin, Missouri, Illinois and Ohio.Oklahoma. We also manage fivetwelve hotels, resorts and other properties for third parties in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Texas, Arizona, Missouri, Nevada and California and a vacation ownership club in Wisconsin.California.
Both of these business segments are discussed in detail below.
Our current strategic plans include the following goalsPlease see our discussion under “Current Plans” in Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and strategies:Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
2
3
At the end of fiscal 2006,2007, we owned or operated 4550 movie theatre locations with a total of 504608 screens in Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio, North Dakota and OhioIowa for an average of 11.212.2 screens per location, compared to an average of 11.2 screens per location at the end of fiscal 20052006 and 10.7 at2005. Included in the end of fiscal 2004.2007 totals are two theatres with 20 screens that we manage for other owners. Included in the fiscal 2006 and 2005 and 2004 totals wereare four theatres with 40 screens that we managed for other owners. Our 4148 company-owned facilities include 2028 megaplex theatres (12 or more screens), representing 68%72% of our total screens, 19 multiplex theatres (two to 11 screens) and twoone single-screen theatres.theatre. At fiscal year-end, we operated 585 first-run screens, 20 of which are operated under management contracts, and 23 budget-oriented screens.
During fiscalOn November 17, 2006, we began construction onopened our new 12-screen theatre in Green Bay, Wisconsin and on our new 13-screen theatre in Sturtevant/Racine, Wisconsin. The new theatres in Green Bay and Sturtevant/Racine, Wisconsin will replacereplaced older existing facilities to offer moviegoers the latest technology and amenities. In early fiscaladdition, on May 4, 2007, we broke ground onopened our new flagship theatre, to be called “TheThe Marcus Majestic” of Brookfield, in Brookfield, Wisconsin. The Majestic will replacereplaced two smaller existing theatres with 17 screens in the same market and is expected to featurefeatures 16 stadium-style auditoriums, including two 72-feet-wideUltraScreens®, and a multi-use auditorium called the AT&T Palladium, fully equipped for live performances, meetings, broadcast concerts and willsporting events and regular screenings of first-run movies, with an attached kitchen from which we offer a full menu. The Majestic also includehas two caféscafes – one serving branded pizza and a lounge. At fiscal year-end,another serving branded coffee, ice cream and chocolates.
On April 19, 2007, we operated 484 first-runcompleted the acquisition of 11 multi-screen movie theatres owned and/or leased by Cinema Entertainment Corp. in portions of Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota and Iowa. The acquisition added 122 screens 40 of which are operated under management contracts,to our theatre operations. Additionally, we plan to add up to three new 72-foot-wideUltraScreens® to existing theatres during the next year, as well as expand our food and 20 budget-oriented screens.beverage offerings at several existing locations.
Revenues for the theatre business, and the motion picture industry in general, are heavily dependent on the general audience appeal of available films, together with studio marketing, advertising and support campaigns, factors over which we have no control. TwoThree fiscal 20062007 films produced box office receipts in excess of $3 million for our circuit, compared to fivetwo films that reached that amount during fiscal 2005.2006. The following five fiscal 20062007 films produced the most box office receipts for our circuit:Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe,WarPirates of the WorldsCaribbean: Dead Man’s Chest,Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge ofSpider-Man 3,Night at the SithMuseum,Shrek the Third andWedding CrashersCars.
We obtain our films from several national motion picture production and distribution companies and are not dependent on any single motion picture supplier. Our booking, advertising, concession purchases and promotional activities are handled centrally by our administrative staff.
4
We strive to provide our movie patrons with high-quality picture and sound presentation in clean, comfortable, attractive and contemporary theatre environments. Substantially all of our movie theatre complexes feature either digital sound, Dolby or other stereo sound systems; acoustical ceilings; side wall insulation; engineered drapery folds to eliminate sound imbalance, reverberation and distortion; tiled floors; loge seats; cup-holder chair-arms; and computer-controlled heating, air conditioning and ventilation. We offer stadium seating, a tiered seating system that permits unobstructed viewing, at approximately 90% of our first-run screens. Computerized box offices permit all of our movie theatres to sell tickets in advance. Our theatres are accessible to persons with disabilities and provide wireless headphones for hearing-impaired moviegoers. Other amenities at certain theatres include THX auditoriums, which allow customers to hear the softest and loudest sounds, and touch-screen, computerized, self-service ticket kiosks, which simplify advance ticket purchases. We own a minority interest in MovieTickets.com, a joint venture of movie and entertainment companies that was created to sell movie tickets over the internet and represents a large majority of the top 50 market theatre screens throughout the United States and Canada. As a result of our association with MovieTickets.com, moviegoers can buy tickets to movies at any of our first-run theatres via the internet and print them at home.
3
We are currently testing digital cinema hardware and software in our theatres.theatres and expect to expand our testing to include digital 3D technology. Digital cinema may be able to deliver an improved film presentation to our customers, increase our scheduling flexibility and provide an opportunity for alternate programming in our auditoriums other than movies, but the reliability of the hardware and software and the potential costs associated with this new technology are yet to be determined. Upon completion of successful testing and the determination of a suitable financing methodology (all film studios have preliminarily indicated that they will participate in the financing of the new technology implementation), we would anticipate a broader roll-out of digital cinema to our theatres in the future.
We sell food and beverage concessions in all of our movie theatres. We believe that a wide variety of food and beverage items, properly merchandised, increases concession revenue per patron. Although popcorn and soda remain the traditional favorites with moviegoers, we continue to upgrade our available concessions by offering varied choices. For example, some of our theatres offer hot dogs, pizza, ice cream, pretzel bites, frozen yogurt, coffee, mineral water and juices. We have recently added self-serve soft drinks to many of our theatres. The initial response to our new food and beverage offerings at the Majestic has been positive and we are currently exploring opportunities to duplicate and/or expand on these food and beverage strategies at several of our existing theatres.
We have a variety of ancillary revenue sources in our theatres, with the largest related to the sale of pre-show and lobby advertising. We have held a minority interest since fiscal 2004 in Cinema Screen Media, a cinema advertising company that provides pre-show entertainment on our screensAdditional ancillary revenues can come from corporate and on over 3,000 screens nationwide.group sales, sponsorships and alternate auditorium uses.
We also own a family entertainment center,Funset Boulevard, adjacent to our 14-screen movie theatre in Appleton, Wisconsin.Funset Boulevard features a 40,000 square foot Hollywood-themed indoor amusement facility that includes a restaurant, party room, laser tag center, virtual reality games, arcade, outdoor miniature golf course and batting cages.
Owned and Operated Hotels and Resorts
The Pfister Hotel
We own and operate the Pfister Hotel, which is located in downtown Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The Pfister Hotel is a full service luxury hotel and has 307 guest rooms (including 82 luxury suites and 176 tower rooms), three restaurants, twothree cocktail lounges and a 275-car parking ramp. The Pfister also has 24,000 square feet of banquet and convention facilities. The Pfister’s banquet and meeting rooms accommodate up to 3,000 people and the hotel features two large ballrooms, including one of the largest ballrooms in the Milwaukee metropolitan area, with banquet seating for 1,200 people. A portion of the Pfister’s first-floor space is leased for use by retail tenants. In fiscal 2006,2007, the Pfister Hotel earned its 3031thst consecutive four-diamond award from the American Automobile Association. The Pfister is also a member of Preferred Hotels and Resorts Worldwide Association, an organization of independent luxury hotels and resorts, and the Association of Historic Hotels of America. We are currently addinghave added a new signature restaurant to this hotel named the Mason Street Grill (replacing an existing restaurant) and we are addingrecently added a new spa and salon. Renovations to guest rooms, and meeting spaces and the parking garage are also planned at this hotel.
5
The Hilton Milwaukee City Center
We own and operate the 729-room Hilton Milwaukee City Center. Several aspects of Hilton’s franchise program have benefited this hotel, including Hilton’s international centralized reservation and marketing system, advertising cooperatives and frequent stay programs. The Hilton Milwaukee City Center also features Paradise Landing, an indoor water park and family fun center that features water slides, swimming pools, a sand beach, lounge and restaurant. The hotel also has two cocktail lounges, two restaurants and an 870-car parking ramp.
4
Hilton Madison at Monona Terrace
We own and operate the 240-room Hilton Madison at Monona Terrace in Madison, Wisconsin. The Hilton Madison, which also benefits from the aspects of Hilton’s franchise program noted above, is connected by skywalk to the Monona Terrace Community and Convention Center, has four meeting rooms totaling 2,400 square feet, an indoor swimming pool, a fitness center, a lounge and a restaurant.
The Grand Geneva Resort & Spa
We own and operate the Grand Geneva Resort & Spa in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, which is the largest convention resort in Wisconsin. This full-facility destination resort is located on 1,300 acres and includes 355 guest rooms, 50,000over 60,000 square feet of banquet, meeting and exhibit space 6,600(including approximately 12,000 square feet added during the past year), over 13,000 square feet of ballroom space, three specialty restaurants, two cocktail lounges, two championship golf courses, several ski-hills, two indoor and five outdoor tennis courts, three swimming pools, a spa and fitness complex, horse stables and an on-site airport. In fiscal 2006,2007, the Grand Geneva Resort & Spa earned its 89th consecutive four-diamond award from the American Automobile Association. A major conference center expansion, which will add approximately 12,000 square feet of meeting space to the resort, isWe are currently under development and we are reviewing plans for a guest room renovation and a major renovation of the outdoor pool complex.
Through fiscal 2006, we managed and sold units of a vacation ownership development, the Marcus Vacation Club, that is adjacent to the Grand Geneva Resort & Spa. The development includes 62 timeshare units and a timeshare sales center. In early fiscal 2007, we sold the remaining inventory in this development to Orange Lake Resort & Country Club of Orlando, Florida, but will continue to provide hospitality management services for the property, including check-in, housekeeping and maintenance.
Hotel Phillips
We own and operate the Hotel Phillips, a 217-room hotel in Kansas City, Missouri. After purchasing and completely restoring this landmark hotel, we reopened it in September 2001. The Hotel Phillips has conference rooms totaling 5,600 square feet of meeting space, a 2,300 square foot ballroom, a restaurant and a lounge.
Four Points by Sheraton Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile
We own and operate the Four Points by Sheraton Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, a 226-room (including 130 suites) hotel in Chicago, Illinois. The Four Points by Sheraton Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile has affordable, well-appointed guestroomsguest rooms and suites, 3,000 square feet of high-tech meeting rooms, an indoor swimming pool and fitness room and an on-site parking facility. The hotel will alsoleases space to one area restaurant and plans to lease space to severalup to two additional area restaurants with one restaurant currently under development.or retail outlets.
WyndhamInterContinental Milwaukee Center
We own and operate the InterContinental Milwaukee in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Formerly the Wyndham Milwaukee Center, inthis hotel recently underwent a major renovation and rebranding to the upscale InterContinental brand. The InterContinental Milwaukee Wisconsin. The Wyndham Milwaukee Center has 220 rooms, 12,000 square feet of flexible banquet and meeting space, on-site parking, a restaurant and two lounges and is located in the heart of Milwaukee’s theatre and financial district. A major renovation of this hotel is expected to begin during our fiscal 2007 second quarter.
6
Westin ColumbusSkirvin Hilton
DuringWe are the last monthprincipal equity partner and operator of fiscal 2006, we acquired the Westin ColumbusSkirvin Hilton hotel in Columbus, Ohio. The Westin Columbus is a AAA four-diamond full-serviceOklahoma City, Oklahoma, the oldest hotel in Oklahoma. This historic hotel that currently includes 186has 225 rooms, andincluding 20 one-bedroom suites and offers more than 12,000one Presidential Suite, and was renovated and reopened on February 26, 2007 by a public-private joint venture. The Skirvin Hilton will benefit from the aspects of Hilton’s franchise program noted above and has a restaurant, lounge, fitness center, indoor swimming pool, business center and approximately 18,500 square feet of meeting banquetspace.
5
Managed Hotels, Resorts and ballroom space, a restaurant and a cocktail lounge. The hotel is located in the heart of the downtown business district and is connected to the Southern Theatre, a historically restored performing arts theater. We anticipate a substantial renovation of this property during our fiscal 2007 and we will consider adding a majority equity partner to this hotel in the future.
Operated and Managed HotelsOther Properties
We operatealso manage hotels, resorts and other properties for third parties, typically under long-term management agreements. Revenues from these management contracts may include both base management fees, often in the form of a fixed percentage of defined revenues, and incentive management fees, typically calculated based upon defined profit performance. We may also earn fees for technical and preopening services before a property opens, as well as for on-going accounting and technology services.
We manage the Crowne Plaza-Northstar Hotel in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Crowne Plaza-Northstar Hotel is located in downtown Minneapolis and has 226 guest rooms, 13 meeting rooms, 6,370 square feet of ballroom and convention space, a restaurant, a cocktail lounge and an exercise facility.
We manage the Hotel Mead in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin. The Hotel Mead has 157 guest rooms, ten meeting rooms totaling 14,000 square feet of meeting space, two cocktail lounges, two restaurants and an indoor pool with a sauna and whirlpool. The Hotel Mead is expected to be sold during fiscal 2008, at which point we would likely cease managing the hotel.
We operatemanage Beverly Garland’s Holiday Inn in North Hollywood, California. The Beverly Garland has 257 guest rooms, including 12 suites, meeting space for up to 600, including an amphitheater and ballroom, an outdoor swimming pool and lighted tennis courts. The mission-style hotel is located on seven acres near Universal Studios.
We manage the Timber Ridge Lodge, an indoor/outdoor waterpark and condominium complex in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin. The Timber Ridge Lodge is a 225-unit condominium hotel on the same campus as our Grand Geneva Resort & Spa. The Timber Ridge Lodge has meeting rooms totaling 3,640 square feet, a general store, a restaurant-cafe, a snack bar and lounge, a state-of-the-art fitness center and an entertainment arcade.
Finally, we operateWe manage the Hilton Garden Inn Houston NW/Chateau in Houston, Texas. The Hilton Garden Inn has 171 guest rooms, a ballroom, a restaurant, a fitness center, a convenience mart and a swimming pool. The hotel is a part of Chateau Court, a 13-acre, European-style mixed-use development that also includes retail space and an office village.
Two new hotels are currently under construction that we willWe manage upon completion of the respective projects. The Platinum Hotel & Spa, will be a luxury condominium hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada just off the Las Vegas StripStrip. Developed and opened in October 2006 by a joint venture that will featurewe originally owned a 50% interest in, we now own 100% of the public space (with all condominium units to be ultimately individually-owned). In addition to earning a management fee equal to a share of room revenue when any of the 255 condo units, a luxuryone and two-bedroom suites are rented, we have the opportunity to earn revenues from the on-site restaurant, lounge, spa indoor and outdoor swimming pools, 8,440 square feet of meeting space restaurants, lounge and an upscale bar. We own 50% of the joint venture developingat this hotel, which is expected to open in September 2007. We are also participating, as the principal equity partner, innon-gaming, non-smoking hotel.
In February 2007, we formed a joint venture to restoreacquire the Sheraton Madison Hotel in Madison, Wisconsin. We own a 15% minority interest in the joint venture and thenwill manage the Skirvinhotel and oversee a major renovation of the property. The hotel features 237 rooms and suites, an indoor heated swimming pool, whirlpool, fitness center and 18,000 square feet of meeting space. It is adjacent to the Alliant Energy Center, which boasts more than 150,000 square feet of exhibit space, and is located approximately 1.5 miles from the Monona Terrace Convention Center, the city’s convention center facility.
We manage the Westin Columbus in Columbus, Ohio. Formerly a company-owned hotel, in April 2007 we sold the Westin Columbus into a joint venture with Waterton Tactical Real Estate Fund I, a discretionary real estate fund sponsored by Chicago-based Waterton Commercial, LLC. We own a 15% minority interest in the joint venture and will continue to operate and manage the hotel. The Westin Columbus is a AAA four-diamond full-service historic hotel that currently includes 186 rooms and suites and offers more than 12,000 square feet of meeting, banquet and ballroom space, a restaurant and a cocktail lounge. The hotel is located in the heart of the downtown business district and is connected to the Southern Theatre, a historically restored performing arts theater. This property will undergo a substantial renovation during our fiscal 2008.
6
In fiscal 2007, we also signed agreements to operate four additional properties for other owners. We now manage Brynwood Country Club in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Brynwood has an 18-hole golf course, four tennis courts, a fitness center, swimming pool and banquet facilities. We also now manage Resort Suites, a four-star destination resort in Scottsdale, Arizona, offering 483 suites, four swimming pools, three whirlpools, a fitness center, a 24-hour concierge and 7,600 square feet of meeting space. Plans for renovations of and modifications to this property are under development. In February 2007, we signed an agreement to manage the Sheraton Clayton Plaza Hotel in Oklahoma City, the oldest hotel in Oklahoma. Renovation of this historic hotel began in fiscal 2006 and is expected to be completed in February 2007. When completed, this hotel is expected to have 225St. Louis, Missouri, which offers 257 rooms and 25,000suites, an indoor swimming pool, a fitness facility, and a business center. The hotel will undergo a multi-million dollar renovation beginning later in 2007. Finally, we were selected to manage an under-construction Hilton Hotel in Bloomington, Minnesota. The hotel, scheduled to open in January of 2008, will offer 256 rooms, an indoor swimming pool, a club level, a fitness center, a business center and 9,100 square feet of meeting space.
Both of our businesses experience intense competition from national, regional and local chain and franchise operations, some of which have substantially greater financial and marketing resources than we have. Most of our facilities are located in close proximity to competing facilities.
7
Our movie theatres compete with large national movie theatre operators, such as AMC Entertainment, Cinemark, Regal Cinemas and Carmike Cinemas, as well as with a wide array of smaller first-run exhibitors. Movie exhibitors also generally compete with the home video, pay-per-view and cable television markets. We believe that such ancillary markets have assisted the growth of the movie theatre industry by encouraging the production of first-run movies released for initial movie theatre exhibition, which has historically established the demand for such movies in these ancillary markets.
Our hotels and resorts compete with the hotels and resorts operated by Hyatt Corporation, Marriott Corporation, Ramada Inns, Holiday Inns and others, along with other regional and local hotels and resorts.
We believe that the principal factors of competition in both of our businesses, in varying degrees, are the price and quality of the product, quality and location of our facilities and customer service. We believe that we are well positioned to compete on the basis of these factors.
Historically, our first fiscal quarter has produced the strongest operating results because this period coincides with the typical summer seasonality of the movie theatre industry and the summer strength of our lodging business. Our third fiscal quarter has historically produced the weakest operating results in our hotels and resorts division primarily due to the effects of reduced travel during the winter months. Our third fiscal quarter for our theatre division has historically been our second strongest quarter but is heavily dependent upon the quantity and quality of films released during the Thanksgiving to Christmas holiday period.
We do not expect federal, state or local environmental legislation to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. However, our activities in acquiring and selling real estate for business development purposes have been complicated by the continued emphasis that our personnel must place on properly analyzing real estate sites for potential environmental problems. This circumstance has resulted in, and is expected to continue to result in, greater time and increased costs involved in acquiring and selling properties associated with our various businesses.
7
As of the end of fiscal 2006,2007, we had approximately 5,3006,800 employees, overapproximately one-half of whom were employed on a part-time basis. A number of our (1) hotel employees at the Crowne Plaza Northstar in Minneapolis, Minnesota are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on April 30, 2010; (2) operating engineers in the Hilton Milwaukee City Center and Pfister Hotel are covered by collective bargaining agreements that expireexpired on December 31, 2006 and April 30, 2007, respectively;respectively, and have been extended on a day-to-day basis during on-going negotiations; (3) a number of our hotel employees in the Hilton Milwaukee City Center and the Pfister Hotel are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on AugustJune 15, 2006;2009; (4) painters in the Hilton Milwaukee City Center and the Pfister Hotel are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on May 31, 2008; (5) projectionists at thea Chicago, Illinois theatrestheatre that we manage for a third party are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on October 14, 2006;20, 2008; (6) projectionists at other Chicago locations are currently actively negotiatingcovered by a new collective bargaining agreement and the current agreement has been extended for the duration of these negotiations;that expires on December 31, 2008; (7) projectionists in Madison, Wisconsin are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on April 2, 2008; and (8) projectionists in Milwaukee, Wisconsin are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on May 30, 2007.2008; (9) a number of hotel employees at the Sheraton Clayton Plaza Hotel that we manage for a third party are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on December 14, 2009; (10) operating engineers at the Sheraton Clayton Plaza Hotel are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on November 30, 2009; and (11) painters at the Sheraton Clayton Plaza Hotel are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that expires on August 31, 2010.
Our corporate web site is www.marcuscorp.com. All of our Form 10-Ks, Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks, and amendments thereto, are available on this web site as soon as practicable after they have been filed with the SEC. In addition, our corporate governance guidelines and the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are available on our web site. If you would like us to mail you a copy of our corporate governance guidelines or a committee charter, please contact Thomas F. Kissinger, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, The Marcus Corporation, 100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1900, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202-4125.
8
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
The Lack of Both the Quantity and Audience Appeal of Motion Pictures May Adversely Affect Our Financial Results.
The financial results of our movie theatre business and the motion picture industry in general are heavily dependent on the general audience appeal of available films, together with studio marketing, advertising and support campaigns, factors over which we have no control. The relative success of our movie theatre business will continue to be largely dependent upon the quantity and audience appeal of films made available by the movie studios and other producers. Also, our quarterly results of operations are significantly dependent on the quantity and audience appeal of films that we exhibit during each quarter. As a result, our quarterly results may be unpredictable and somewhat volatile.
8
Our Financial Results May be Adversely Impacted by Unique Factors Affecting the Theatre Exhibition Industry, Such as the Shrinking Video Release Window, the Increasing Piracy of Feature Films and the Increasing Use of Alternative Film Distribution Channels and Other Competing Forms of Entertainment.
Over the last decade, the average video release window, which represents the time that elapses from the date of a film’s theatrical release to the date a film is available on video or DVD, has decreased from approximately six months to less than four and one-half months. We cannot assure you that this release window, which is determined by the film studios, will not shrink further, which could have an adverse impact on our movie theatre business and results of operations.
Piracy of motion pictures is prevalent in many parts of the world. Technological advances allowing the unauthorized dissemination of motion pictures increase the threat of piracy by making it easier to create, transmit and distribute high quality unauthorized copies of such motion pictures. The proliferation of unauthorized copies and piracy of motion pictures may have an adverse effect on our movie theatre business and results of operations.
We face competition for movie theatre patrons from a number of alternative motion picture distribution channels, such as DVD, network, cable and satellite television, video on-demand, pay-per-view television and downloading utilizing the internet. We also compete with other forms of entertainment competing for our patrons’ leisure time and disposable income such as concerts, amusement parks, sporting events, home entertainment systems, video games and portable entertainment devices such as the iPod®. An increase in popularity of these alternative film distribution channels and competing forms of entertainment may have an adverse effect on our movie theatre business and results of operations.
The Relative Industry Supply of Available Rooms at Comparable Lodging Facilities May Adversely Affect Our Financial Results.
Historically, a material increase in the supply of new hotel rooms in a market can destabilize that market and cause existing hotels to experience decreasing occupancy, room rates and profitability. If such over-supply occurs in one or more of our major markets, we may experience an adverse effect on our hotels and resorts business and results of operations.
9
Our Businesses are Heavily Capital Intensive and Preopening and Start-Up Costs and Increasing Depreciation Expenses May Adversely Affect Our Financial Results.
Both our movie theatre and hotels and resorts businesses are heavily capital intensive. Purchasing properties and buildings, constructing buildings, renovating and remodeling buildings and investing in joint venture projects all require substantial upfront cash investments before these properties, facilities and joint ventures can generate sufficient revenues to pay for the upfront costs and positively contribute to our profitability. In addition, many growth opportunities, particularly for our hotels and resorts division, require lengthy development periods during which significant capital is committed and preopening costs and early start-up losses are incurred. We expense these preopening and start-up costs currently. As a result, our results of operations may be adversely affected by our significant levels of capital investments. Additionally, to the extent we capitalize our capital expenditures, our depreciation expenses may increase, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations.
Downturns or adverse economic conditions affecting the United States economy generally, and particularly downturns or adverse economic conditions in the Midwest and in our other markets, adversely affect our results of operations, particularly with respect to our hotels and resorts division. Poor economic conditions can significantly adversely affect the business and group travel customers, which are the largest customer segments for our hotels and resorts division. Additionally, although our theatre business has historically performed well during economic downturns as consumers seek less expensive forms of out-of-home entertainment, a significant reduction in consumer confidence or disposable income in general may temporarily affect the demand for motion pictures or severely impact the motion picture production industry, which, in turn, may adversely affect our results of operations.
9
Adverse Weather Conditions, Particularly During the Winter in the Midwest and in Our Other Markets, May Adversely Affect Our Financial Results.
Poor weather conditions adversely affect business and leisure travel plans, which directly impacts our hotels and resorts division. In addition, theatre attendance on any given day may be negatively impacted by adverse weather conditions. In particular, adverse weather during peak movie-going weekends or holiday time periods may negatively affect our results of operations. Adverse winter weather conditions may also increase our snow removal and other maintenance costs in both of our divisions.
In each of our businesses we experience intense competition from national, regional and local chain and franchise operations, some of which have substantially greater financial and marketing resources than we have. Most of our facilities are located in close proximity to other facilities which compete directly with ours. The motion picture exhibition industry is fragmented and highly competitive with no significant barriers to entry. Theatres operated by national and regional circuits and by small independent exhibitors compete with our theatres, particularly with respect to film licensing, attracting patrons and developing new theatre sites. Moviegoers are generally not brand conscious and usually choose a theatre based on its location, the films showing there and its amenities. With respect to our hotels and resorts division, our ability to remain competitive and to attract and retain business and leisure travelers depends on our success in distinguishing the quality, value and efficiency of our lodging products and services from those offered by others. If we are unable to compete successfully in either of our divisions, this could adversely affect our results of operations.
10
Our Ability to Identify Suitable Properties to Acquire, Develop and Manage Will Directly Impact Our Ability to Achieve Certain of Our Growth Objectives.
A portion of our ability to successfully achieve our growth objectives in both our theatre and hotels and resorts divisions is dependent upon our ability to successfully identify suitable properties to acquire, develop and manage. Failure to successfully identify, acquire and develop suitable and successful locations for new lodging properties and theatres will substantially limit our ability to achieve these important growth objectives.
Our Properties are Subject to Risks Relating to Acts of God, Terrorist Activity and War and Any Such Event May Adversely Affect our Financial Results.
Acts of God, natural disasters, war (including the potential for war), terrorist activity (including threats of terrorist activity), epidemics (such as SARs and bird flu), travel-related accidents, as well as political unrest and other forms of civil strife and geopolitical uncertainty may adversely affect the lodging and movie exhibition industries and our results of operation.operations. Terrorism incidents, such as the events of September 11, 2001, and wars, such as the Iraq war, in 2003, significantly impact business and leisure travel and consequently demand for hotel rooms. In addition, inadequate preparedness, contingency planning, insurance coverage or recovery capability in relation to a major incident or crisis may prevent operational continuity and consequently impact the reputation of our businesses.
10
Historically, our first fiscal quarter has produced our strongest operating results because this period coincides with the typically strong summer performance of the movie theatre industry and the summer strength of our lodging business. Our third fiscal quarter has historically produced our weakest operating results in our hotels and resorts division, primarily due to the affects of reduced travel during the winter months. Our third fiscal quarter for our theatre division has historically been our second strongest quarter but is heavily dependent upon the quantity and quality of films released during the Thanksgiving to Christmas holiday period.
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
| Item 2. | Properties. |
We own the real estate of a substantial portion of our facilities, including, as of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, the Pfister Hotel, the Hilton Milwaukee City Center, the Hilton Madison at Monona Terrace, the Grand Geneva Resort & Spa, the Hotel Phillips, the WyndhamInterContinental Milwaukee, Center, the Westin ColumbusSkirvin Hilton and the majority of our theatres. We lease the remainder of our facilities. As of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, we also managed five hoteltwelve hotels, resorts and other properties and fourtwo theatres that are owned by third parties. Additionally, we own properties acquired for the future construction and operation of new facilities. All of our properties are suitably maintained and adequately utilized to cover the respective business segment served.
11
Our owned, leased and managed properties are summarized, as of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, in the following table:
| Business Segment | Total Number of Facilities in Operation | Owned(1) | Leased from Unrelated Parties(2) | Managed for Related Parties | Managed for Unrelated Parties(2) | Total Number of Facilities in Operation | Owned(1) | Leased from Unrelated Parties(2) | Managed for Related Parties | Managed for Unrelated Parties(2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theatres: | ||||||||||
| Movie Theatres | 45 | 32 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 50 | 40 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Family Entertainment Center | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Hotels and Resorts: | ||||||||||
| Hotels | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Resorts | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Vacation Ownership | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||
| Other Properties | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
| Limited-Service Lodging: | ||||||||||
| Baymont Inns & Suites | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Total | 62 | 40 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 73 | 48 | 9 | 4 | 12 |
| (1) |
| (2) | The |
Certain of the above individual properties or facilities are subject to purchase money or construction mortgages or commercial lease financing arrangements, but we do not consider these encumbrances, individually or in the aggregate, to be material.
Over 90% of our operating property leases expire on various dates after the end of fiscal 20072008 (assuming we exercise all of our renewal and extension options).
11
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. |
We do not believe that any pending legal proceedings involving us are material to our business. No legal proceeding required to be disclosed under this item was terminated during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.2007.
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.2007.
Each of our executive officers is identified below together with information about each officer’s age, position and employment history for at least the past five years:
| Name | Position | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen H. Marcus | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| Bruce J. Olson | Senior Vice President and President of Marcus Theatres Corporation | |
| Thomas F. Kissinger | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | |
| Douglas A. Neis | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
| William J. Otto | President and Chief Operating Officer of Marcus Hotels, Inc. | |
| Gregory S. Marcus | Senior Vice President - Corporate Development |
Stephen H. Marcus has been our Chairman of the Board since December 1991 and our President and Chief Executive Officer since December 1988. Mr. Marcus has worked at the Company for 4445 years.
12
Bruce J. Olson joined the Company in 1974. Mr. Olson served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Marcus Theatres Corporation from August 1978 until October 1988, at which time he was appointed President of that corporation. Mr. Olson also served as our Vice President-Administration and Planning from September 1987 until July 1991. In July 1991, he was appointed as our Group Vice President and in October 2004, he was promoted to Senior Vice President. He was elected to serve on our Board of Directors in April 1996.
Thomas F. Kissinger joined the Company in August 1993 as Secretary and Director of Legal Affairs. In August 1995, he was promoted to General Counsel and Secretary and in October 2004, he was promoted to Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to August 1993, Mr. Kissinger was associated with the law firm of Foley & Lardner LLP for five years.
Douglas A. Neis joined the Company in February 1986 as Controller of the Marcus Theatres division and in November 1987, he was promoted to Controller of Marcus Restaurants. In July 1991, Mr. Neis was appointed Vice President of Planning and Administration for Marcus Restaurants. In September 1994, Mr. Neis was also named as our Director of Technology and in September 1995 he was elected as our Corporate Controller. In September 1996, Mr. Neis was promoted to our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
William J. Otto joined the Company in 1993 as the Senior Vice President of Operations of Marcus Hotels, Inc. In 1996, Mr. Otto was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Marcus Hotels, Inc. and in April 2001 he was further promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer of Marcus Hotels, Inc.
Gregory S. Marcus joined the Company in March 1992 as Director of Property Management/Corporate Development. He was promoted in 1999 to Senior Vice President – Corporate Development and became an executive officer of the Company in July 2005. He was elected to serve on our Board of Directors in October 2005.
12
Our executive officers are generally elected annually by the Board of Directors after the annual meeting of shareholders. Each executive officer holds office until his successor has been duly qualified and elected or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.
13
| Item 5. | Market for the Company’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities. |
| (a) | Stock Performance Graph |
The following information under the caption “Stock Performance Graph” in this Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed”” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such a filing.
Set forth below is a graph comparing the annual percentage change during our last five fiscal years in our cumulative total shareholder return (stock price appreciation on a dividend reinvested basis) of our Common Shares, compared to: (1) the cumulative total return of a composite peer group index selected by us and (2) companies included in the Russell 2000 Index. The composite peer group index is comprised of a hotels and resorts index we selected that includes Choice Hotels International, Inc., Four Seasons Hotels Inc., John Q. Hammons Hotels Inc., Lodgian Inc., Orient Express Hotels, Ltd., Sonesta International Hotels Corp. and Red Lions Corporation (formerly WestCoast Hospitality Corp.) (weighted 50%) and a theatre index we selected that includes Regal Cinemas (weighted 50%). Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corp., which was previously included in our peer group for the theatre index, was acquired by a private company and no longer has a class of stock that is publicly traded. As a result, Loews Cineplex is no longer included in our peer group for the theatre index. Additionally, John Q. Hammons, which was taken private, is reflected only through September 18, 2005.
The indices within the composite peer group index are weighted to approximate the relative revenue contributions of each of our continuing business segments to our total revenues in our fiscal 2007. The shareholder returns of the companies included in the hotels and resorts index and theatre index are weighted based on each company’s relative market capitalization as of the beginning of the presented periods.
Source: FactSet Data Systems, Inc.
13
| 5/31/02 | 5/31/03 | 5/31/04 | 5/31/05 | 5/31/06 | 5/31/07 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Marcus Corporation | $100 | $97 | $115 | $158 | $181 | $244 |
| Composite Peer Group Index(1) | 100 | 90 | 126 | 168 | 192 | 236 |
| Russell 2000 Index | 100 | 90 | 117 | 127 | 148 | 174 |
| (1) | Weighted 50.0% for the Company-selected Hotels & Resorts Index and 50.0% for the Company-selected Theatre Index. |
| (b) | Market Information |
Our Common Stock, $1 par value, is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “MCS.” Our Class B Common Stock, $1 par value, is neither listed nor traded on any exchange. During each quarter of fiscal 2005 and the first and second quarters of fiscal 2006, we paid a dividend of $0.055 per share of our Common Stock and $0.05 per share of our Class B Common Stock. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2006, and the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007, we paid a dividend of $0.075 per share of our Common Stock and $0.06818 per share of our Class B Common Stock. Additionally, on January 17, 2006,During the Company announced the declarationthird and fourth quarters of fiscal 2007, we paid a special cash distributiondividend of $7.00$0.085 per share on the Company’sof our Common Stock and $0.07727 per share of our Class B Common Stock, which was paid on February 24, 2006. On February 27, 2006, during the Company’s fourth quarter, the Company’s stock began trading ex-dividend, reflecting the special distribution.Stock. The following table lists the high and low sale prices of our Common Stock for the periods indicated, which have been retroactively reduced for all periods prior to February 27, 2006 by $7.00 per share to adjust for the special cash distribution.indicated.
| Fiscal 2006 | 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | $15.73 | $18.34 | $18.95 | $19.99 |
| Low | $12.18 | $11.35 | $14.05 | $15.20 |
| Fiscal 2005 | 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal 2007 | 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | ||||
| High | $12.70 | $15.69 | $19.00 | $17.04 | $21.68 | $26.10 | $26.31 | $24.17 |
| Low | $8.50 | $11.71 | $15.08 | $10.90 | $17.15 | $19.30 | $22.52 | $20.18 |
Fiscal 2006 | 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | ||||
| High | $15.73 | $18.34 | $18.95 | $19.99 | ||||
| Low | $12.18 | $11.35 | $14.05 | $15.20 | ||||
On August 4, 2006,6, 2007, there were 2,2362,185 shareholders of record of our Common Stock and 5651 shareholders of record of our Class B Common Stock.
14
| Stock Repurchases |
As of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to 4.7 million shares of our outstanding Common Stock. Pursuant to this board authorization, we may repurchase shares of our Common Stock from time to time in the open market, pursuant to privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The repurchased shares are held in our treasury pending potential future issuance in connection with employee benefit, option or stock ownership plans or other general corporate purposes. Pursuant to this board authorization, we have repurchased approximately 3.13.6 million shares of Common Stock as of May 25, 2006.31, 2007. This board authorization does not have an expiration date.
The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases made by us or on our behalf of our Common Stock during the periods indicated. All of these repurchases were made in the open market and pursuant to the publicly announced repurchase authorization described above.
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 24 - March 23 | -- | N/A | -- | 1,732,249 |
| March 24 - April 23 | -- | N/A | -- | 1,732,249 |
| April 24 - May 25 | 174,127 | $17.83 | 174,127 | 1,558,122 |
| Total | 174,127 | $17.83 | 174,127 | 1,558,122 |
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 23 - March 22 | -- | -- | -- | 1,307,357 |
| March 23 - April 22 | 35,900 | $21.87 | 35,900 | 1,271,457 |
| April 23 - May 31 | 124,031 | 21.95 | 124,031 | 1,147,426 |
| Total | 159,931 | $21.94 | 159,931 | 1,147,426 |
1514
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data. |
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues(1) | $ | 289,244 | 267,058 | 269,221 | 255,414 | 247,287 | $ | 327,631 | 289,244 | 267,058 | 269,221 | 255,414 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from continuing operations(1) | $ | 22,468 | 19,578 | 18,562 | 14,851 | 13,288 | $ | 33,927 | 22,468 | 19,578 | 18,562 | 14,851 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 28,271 | 99,221 | 24,611 | 20,556 | 22,460 | $ | 33,297 | 28,271 | 99,221 | 24,611 | 20,556 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock Data(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per share - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per common share - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| continuing operations(1) | $ | .73 | .64 | .62 | .50 | .45 | $ | 1.10 | .73 | .64 | .62 | .50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per share | $ | .91 | 3.25 | .82 | .70 | .76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends per share(3) | $ | 7.26 | .22 | .22 | .22 | .22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per common share | $ | 1.08 | .91 | 3.25 | .82 | .70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends per common share(3) | $ | .32 | 7.26 | .22 | .22 | .22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | 30,939 | 30,526 | 29,850 | 29,549 | 29,470 | 30,807 | 30,939 | 30,526 | 29,850 | 29,549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Book value per share | $ | 9.87 | 16.27 | 13.20 | 12.54 | 12.07 | $ | 10.51 | 9.87 | 16.27 | 13.20 | 12.54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Position | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 587,234 | 787,499 | 749,811 | 755,457 | 774,786 | $ | 698,383 | 587,234 | 787,499 | 749,811 | 755,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt(4) | $ | 123,110 | 170,888 | 207,282 | 203,307 | 299,761 | $ | 199,425 | 123,110 | 170,888 | 207,282 | 203,307 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 301,323 | 493,661 | 393,723 | 369,900 | 354,068 | $ | 319,509 | 301,323 | 493,661 | 393,723 | 369,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures and other | $ | 75,532 | 63,431 | 50,915 | 26,004 | 48,899 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures and acquisitions | $ | 186,752 | 75,532 | 63,431 | 50,915 | 26,004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current ratio(4) | .73 | 4.18 | 2.96 | .40 | .51 | .47 | .73 | 4.18 | 2.96 | .40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt/capitalization ratio(4) | .37 | .28 | .37 | .43 | .48 | .45 | .37 | .28 | .37 | .43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average shareholders’ equity | 7.1 | % | 22.4 | % | 6.4 | % | 5.7 | % | 6.5 | % | 10.7 | % | 7.1 | % | 22.4 | % | 6.4 | % | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Restated to present limited-service lodging, the Miramonte Resort and Marcus Vacation Club |
| (2) | All per share and shares outstanding data is on a diluted basis. Earnings per share data is calculated on our Common Stock using the two-class method. |
| (3) | Includes $7.00 per share special dividend paid during fiscal 2006. |
| (4) | 2003 |
1615
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
We report our consolidated and individual segment results of operations on a 52-or-53-week fiscal year ending on the last Thursday in May. Fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 were 52-week years. Our upcoming fiscal 2007 will bewas a 53-week year and we anticipate that our reported results for fiscal 20072006 and 2005 were 52-week years. Fiscal 2008 will benefit from the additional week of reported operations.be a 52-week year.
We divide our fiscal year into three 13-week quarters and a final quarter consisting of 13 or 14 weeks. Our primary operations are reported in two business segments: theatres and hotels and resorts. As a result of the sale of substantially all of the assets of our limited-service lodging division during fiscal 2005, we have presented the limited-service lodging business segment as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements and in this discussion. As a result of our recent sale in June 2006 of the remaining inventory of real estate and development costs associated with our vacation ownership development adjacent to the Grand Geneva Resort and our sale of the Miramonte Resort during fiscal 2005, we have also presented these assets and related results of operations, previously included in our hotels and resorts segment, as part of our discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements and in this discussion. Prior year results have been restated to conform to the current year presentation.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we acquired the ownership interest of a partner in our Las Vegas Platinum Hotel joint venture, increasing our ownership of the property’s public space to 90%. The total purchase price was $10.0 million, including approximately $6.2 million of prepaid development fees. As a result of this transaction, effective October 31, 2006, the assets and liabilities of the Platinum Hotel, as well as the results of its operations, are now reported in our consolidated results. Prior to October 31, the joint venture was accounted for using the equity method of accounting. We acquired the remaining 10% of this joint venture during the second half of fiscal 2007 for $1.0 million.
Historically, our first fiscal quarter has produced the strongest operating results because this period coincides with the typical summer seasonality of the movie theatre industry and the summer strength of the lodging business. Our third fiscal quarter has historically produced the weakest operating results in our hotels and resorts division primarily due to the effects of reduced travel during the winter months. Our third fiscal quarter for our theatre division has historically been our second strongest quarter but is heavily dependent upon the quantity and quality of films released during the Thanksgiving to Christmas holiday period.
The following table sets forth revenues, operating income, other income (expense), earnings from continuing operations, earnings (losses) from discontinued operations, net earnings and earnings per share for the past three fiscal years (in millions, except for per share and percentage change data):
| Change F06 v. F05 | Change F05 v. F04 | Change F07 v. F06 | Change F06 v. F05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | 2004 | Amt. | Pct. | 2007 | 2006 | Amt. | Pct. | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 289.2 | $ | 267.1 | $ | 22.1 | 8.3 | % | $ | 269.2 | $ | (2.1 | ) | -0.8 | % | $ | 327.6 | $ | 289.2 | $ | 38.4 | 13.3 | % | $ | 267.1 | $ | 22.1 | 8.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating income | 39.5 | 38.9 | 0.6 | 1.6 | % | 43.0 | (4.1 | ) | -9.5 | % | 41.1 | 39.5 | 1.6 | 4.0 | % | 38.9 | 0.6 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | (6.7 | ) | (7.6 | ) | 0.9 | 12.3 | % | (12.5 | ) | 4.9 | 39.1 | % | 2.4 | (6.7 | ) | 9.1 | 135.5 | % | (7.6 | ) | 0.9 | 12.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| continuing operations | 22.5 | 19.6 | 2.9 | 14.8 | % | 18.6 | 1.0 | 5.5 | % | 33.9 | 22.5 | 11.4 | 51.0 | % | 19.6 | 2.9 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings (losses) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | 5.8 | 79.6 | (73.8 | ) | -92.7 | % | 6.0 | 73.6 | 1216.6 | % | (0.6 | ) | 5.8 | (6.4 | ) | -110.9 | % | 79.6 | (73.8 | ) | -92.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | 28.3 | 99.2 | (70.9 | ) | -71.5 | % | 24.6 | 74.6 | 303.2 | % | 33.3 | 28.3 | 5.0 | 17.8 | % | 99.2 | (70.9 | ) | -71.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per share - Diluted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per common share - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Continuing operations | $ | .73 | $ | .64 | $ | .09 | 14.1 | % | $ | .62 | $ | .02 | 3.2 | % | $ | 1.10 | $ | .73 | $ | .37 | 50.7 | % | $ | .64 | $ | .09 | 14.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per share | .91 | 3.25 | (2.34 | ) | -72.0 | % | .82 | 2.43 | 296.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per common share | 1.08 | .91 | .17 | 18.7 | % | 3.25 | (2.34 | ) | -72.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16
An increase in revenues and operating income from both our theatre division and our hotels and resorts division contributed to our improved operating results during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year. Theatre division operating results were favorably impacted by new screens and a stronger slate of movies during our fiscal first and fourth quarters compared to the same quarters last year. Operating results from our hotels and resorts division increased slightly during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year despite significant preopening and start-up operating losses related to several of our new hotels. Our additional 53rd week of operations benefited both of our operating divisions and contributed approximately $9.5 million in revenues and $2.9 million in operating income to our fourth quarter and fiscal 2007 results.
Increased gains on disposition of property, equipment and other assets, reduced interest expense and equity losses from unconsolidated joint ventures and a significantly lower income tax rate contributed to a significant increase in earnings from continuing operations during fiscal 2007, offsetting reduced investment income. Our overall net earnings increased during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year despite last year’s gains on the disposition of the previously noted discontinued operations.
We recognized investment income of $3.1 million during fiscal 2007, representing a decrease of $4.8 million, or 60.4%, compared to investment income of $7.9 million during the prior year. Investment income includes interest earned on cash, cash equivalents, cash held by intermediaries and notes receivable, including notes related to prior sales of timeshare units in our hotels and resorts division. Our fiscal 2007 cash balances were substantially lower than the prior year due to the impact of our $214.6 million special dividend paid on February 24, 2006, the first day of our fiscal 2006 fourth quarter, resulting in reduced investment income during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year. Due to our expectations that our notes receivable from timeshare sales will continue to decline (we are no longer selling timeshare units and our current notes are being paid off over time) and our average cash balances during fiscal 2008 will likely be less than fiscal 2007, we expect our fiscal 2008 investment income to be less than fiscal 2007. Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $12.0 million at the end of our fiscal year, compared to $34.5 million at the end of fiscal 2006. The majority of our cash was invested in federal tax-exempt short-term financial instruments during the year.
Our interest expense totaled $13.9 million for fiscal 2007, representing a decrease of approximately $500,000, or 3.3%, compared to fiscal 2006 interest expense of $14.4 million. The decrease in interest expense was primarily the result of making scheduled payments on our long-term debt during the year. We expect our interest expense may increase by approximately $2.5-$3.0 million during fiscal 2008 as a result of increased net borrowings related to our fiscal 2007 fourth quarter theatre acquisition. Current maturities of long-term debt on our balance sheet as of May 31, 2007 included a $25.5 million mortgage note related to our Chicago hotel with a maturity date in December 2007. We currently anticipate extending the maturity date of this note, which would result in the majority of this amount being reclassified as long-term debt.
Our continuing operations recognized net gains on disposition of property, equipment and other assets of $14.5 million during fiscal 2007, compared to similar gains from continuing operations of $1.7 million during fiscal 2006. The fiscal 2007 gains included gains related to the sale of four former restaurant properties, several parcels of land and the Westin Columbus hotel (to a joint venture in which we retained a minority interest). We also reported a significant gain of approximately $5.1 million during fiscal 2007 related to the sale of a theatre in Waukesha, Wisconsin, that was replaced by a new theatre in nearby Brookfield, Wisconsin. The timing of our periodic sales of property and equipment results in variations in the gains or losses that we report on disposition of property and equipment each year. We anticipate periodic additional sales of non-core property and equipment with the potential for additional disposition gains during fiscal 2008, including the potential for another significant gain from the intended sale of a valuable theatre parcel in Brookfield, Wisconsin that was also replaced by our new theatre.
Our fiscal 2007 gains on disposition of property, equipment and other assets also included a gain of approximately $5.9 million related to the sale of condominium units at our Las Vegas Platinum Hotel. As of May 31, 2007, we closed on sales of approximately 93% of the 255 available condominium units, with the majority of the remaining unit sales expected to close during fiscal 2008. We currently anticipate reporting a total gain on disposition of these assets of approximately $6.4 million after all condominium sales have been completed.
17
As noted earlier in this discussion, as a result of acquiring an additional equity interest in Platinum Condominium Development, LLC, the joint venture that developed our luxury condominium hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada, on October 31, 2006, results from our Platinum Hotel venture are now included in our consolidated financial statements and are no longer included in net equity losses from unconsolidated joint ventures. We reported net equity losses from unconsolidated joint ventures of approximately $1.4 million during fiscal 2007 compared to $1.9 million during the prior year. Losses during both years were primarily the result of preopening costs from our previous 50% ownership interest in the Platinum Hotel joint venture. These losses will not be repeated during fiscal 2008. During our fiscal 2007 fourth quarter, we made investments in two hotel joint ventures that are accounted for under the equity method and may result in equity earnings or losses during fiscal 2008.
We reported income tax expense on continuing operations for fiscal 2007 of $9.6 million, a decrease of approximately $800,000, or 8.1%, compared to fiscal 2006. Our effective income tax rate for continuing operations during fiscal 2007 was 22.0%, significantly lower than our fiscal 2006 effective rate of 31.7% and our historical 39-40% range. This was primarily due to investments in federal tax-exempt short-term financial instruments and, more significantly, due to the impact of federal and state historic tax credits generated upon the opening of our Oklahoma City Skirvin Hilton hotel project. These historic tax credits reduced our fiscal 2007 income tax expense by approximately $7.8 million. We currently anticipate that our fiscal 2008 effective income tax rate will return to our historical range.
Net earnings during fiscal 2007 included an after-tax loss from discontinued operations of $500,000, compared to an after-tax loss from discontinued operations of $1.9 million during the prior year. Net earnings for fiscal 2007 and 2006 also included after-tax gains (losses) on sale of discontinued operations of approximately $(100,000) and $7.7 million, respectively. A detailed discussion of these items is included in the Discontinued Operations section. Weighted-average shares outstanding were 30.8 million during fiscal 2007 and 30.9 million during fiscal 2006. All per share data is presented on a diluted basis.
An increase in revenues and operating income from our hotels and resorts division during fiscal 2006 offset a decrease in revenues and operating income from our theatre division compared to the prior year. Operating results from our hotels and resorts division benefited from the addition of two new hotels as well as improved performance from our existing properties, partially offset by combined start-up and preopeningpre-opening costs associated with ongoing development projects. Theatre division operating results were negatively impacted by a particularly weak first quarter slate of movies compared to the prior year, as the division’s operating results during the last three quarters of fiscal 2006 improved slightly compared to the last three quarters of fiscal 2005. Increased investment income and reduced interest expense contributed to an overall increase in earnings from continuing operations during fiscal 2006, offsetting reduced gains on disposition of property and equipment and increased equity losses from unconsolidated joint ventures. Our overall net earnings decreased significantly during fiscal 2006 compareddue to the prior year due to last year’s significant gains on the disposition of the previously noted discontinued operations.
17
We recognized investment income of $7.9 million during fiscal 2006, representing an increase of $1.7 million, or 27.1%, compared to investment income of $6.2 million during the prior year. Investment income includes interest earned on cash, cash equivalents, cash held by intermediaries and notes receivable, including notes related to the sale of timeshare units in our hotels and resorts division. TheOur fiscal 2006 increase in investment income was the result of interest earned on proceeds received from the sale of our limited-service lodging division in September 2004. Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $34.5 million at the end of our fiscal year, but was as high as $292.7 million as of the end of our fiscal 2006 third quarter. The majority of our cash was invested in federal tax-exempt short-term financial instruments.
On January 17, 2006, our Board of Directors approved18
We paid a special cash dividend of $7.00 per share payable on February 24, 2006, the first day of our fiscal 2006 fourth quarter. The special dividend returned to our shareholders approximately $214.6 million of the proceeds received from the sale of the limited-service lodging division. As a result, our investment income was reduced in our fiscal 2006 fourth quarter and will be significantly reduced in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006.
In evaluating the use of the proceeds from the sale of our limited-service lodging division, we believed it was appropriate to return a portion of the value we had created in that business to our shareholders and to provide them with added liquidity for their investment. In addition, in order to provide additional stability to our shareholder return and emphasize our commitment to increasing long-term shareholder value, wequarter. We also increased our regular quarterly dividend by 36% to $.075 per share of common stock.
In a private letter ruling, the Internal Revenue Service determined that the special dividend would be treated as a distribution in partial liquidation pursuant to Sections 302(b)(4) and 302(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code. For shareholders that are not corporations, this means that the special distribution will generally be treated as payment in exchange for stock in the Company that is constructively redeemed. Non-corporate shareholders will generally recognize capital gain or loss on this constructive exchange to the extent of the difference between the amount of the special distribution and their adjusted basis of the shares constructively surrendered. Corporate shareholders generally will not be eligible for capital gains treatment with respect to the special distribution. Shareholders should consult with their tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of the special distribution.
Our interest expense totaled $14.4 million for fiscal 2006, representing a decrease of $500,000, or 3.2%, compared to fiscal 2005 interest expense of $14.9 million. The decrease in interest expense was primarily the result of making scheduled payments on our long-term debt during the year. We do not expect our interest expense to change substantially in fiscal 2007, other than as a result of the payment of scheduled current principal maturities. Current maturities of long-term debt on our balance sheet as of May 25, 2006 included $25.0 million related to a mortgage note on our new Chicago hotel with a maturity date of September 2006. We currently anticipate extending the maturity date of this note, which would result in the majority of this amount being reclassified as long-term debt.
Our continuing operations recognized net gains on disposition of property, equipment and investments in joint venturesother assets of $1.7 million during fiscal 2006, compared to similar gains from continuing operations of $2.2 million during fiscal 2005. The fiscal 2006 net gain was primarily the result of our first quarter sales of a theatre outlot and real estate development in Appleton, Wisconsin and a strip shopping center developed by a joint venture on land adjacent to our theatre in Delafield, Wisconsin. These gains were partially offset by fourth quarter losses related to the closing of a restaurant in our Pfister Hotel and the replacement of certain hotel assets. The timing of our periodic sales of property and equipment results in variations in the gains or losses that we report on disposition of property and equipment each year. We anticipate periodic additional sales of non-core property and equipment with the potential for additional disposition gains during fiscal 2007. It is possible that we may also report significant gains during fiscal 2007 from the intended sale of two valuable theatre parcels in conjunction with our building of a nearby replacement theatre in Brookfield, Wisconsin.
18
We currently hold investments in several joint ventures that are accounted for under the equity method and have reported equity gains and losses from unconsolidated joint ventures as a separate line item on our consolidated statements of earnings. During fiscal 2006, we reported net equity losses from unconsolidated joint ventures of $1.9 million, compared to net equity losses of $1.1 million during the prior fiscal year. Losses during fiscal 2006 were primarily the result of preopeningpre-opening costs from our then 50% ownership interest in Platinum Condominium Development, LLC, which is developingdeveloped a luxury condominium hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada, and operating losses from our former minority ownership interest in Cinema Screen Media, a cinema advertising company that providesprovided pre-show entertainment on our screens and over 3,000 screens nationwide. Primarily as a result of our expectation that the Las Vegas Platinum Hotel will open around September 2006, we do not expect to incur the same level of equity losses during fiscal 2007. In fact, upon completion of construction and the expected closing of the condominium unit sales, our hotels and resorts division will share in any development profit on the project. We currently estimate that our 50% share of the development profit may be recognized during the first half of fiscal 2007 and may be up to approximately $5 to $7 million after all units have closed, net of some expected additional preopening expenses. The division will then manage the hotel for a fee and share in any joint venture earnings on the commercial areas, such as the restaurants, spa and bars.screens.
We reported income tax expense on continuing operations for fiscal 2006 of $10.4 million, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 11.3%, compared to fiscal 2005. Our effective income tax rate for continuing operations during fiscal 2006 was 31.7%, significantly lower than our fiscal 2005 effective rate of 37.5% and our historical 39-40% range.. This was primarily due to the previously described investments in federal tax-exempt short-term financial instruments. A majority of the cash and cash equivalent funds remaining after our special dividend will likely continue to be invested in federal tax-exempt short-term financial instruments until they are needed to meet our cash requirements. These types of investments will continue to favorably impact our effective income tax rate, but not to the same extent in fiscal 2007 as in fiscal 2006 because the invested amount will be much lower. In addition, our fiscal 2007 effective income tax rate is also likely to be favorably impacted by federal and state net historic tax credits of over $6.0 million related to our Oklahoma City Hilton Skirvin project. As a result, assuming that the Hilton Skirvin renovation is completed during fiscal 2007 as planned, we currently anticipate that our fiscal 2007 effective income tax rate may be less than 30.0%.
Net earnings during fiscal 2006 included an after-tax loss from discontinued operations of $1.9 million, compared to after-tax income from discontinued operations of $1.3 million during the prior year. Net earnings for fiscal 2006 and 2005 also included after-tax gains on sale of discontinued operations of $7.7 million and $78.3 million, respectively. A detailed discussion of these items is included in the Discontinued Operations section. Weighted averageWeighted-average shares outstanding were 30.9 million during fiscal 2006 and 30.5 million during fiscal 2005. All per share data is presented on a diluted basis.
An increase in revenues and operating income from our hotels and resorts division was offset by reduced theatre division results, resulting in an overall decrease in total revenues and operating income from continuing operations during fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year. Theatre division operating results were negatively impacted by a weaker slate of movies compared to the prior year. Operating results from our hotels and resorts division for the same properties improved during fiscal 2005, partially offset by combined start-up and preopening costs associated with our new Chicago hotel. Significantly increased investment income and reduced interest expense contributed to an overall increase in earnings from continuing operations during fiscal 2005, offsetting the reduced operating income. Our overall net earnings increased significantly during fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year due to significant gains on the disposition of the previously noted discontinued operations.
19
We recognized investment income of $6.2 million during fiscal 2005, representing an increase of $4.5 million, or 257.6%, compared to investment income of $1.7 million during the prior year. The fiscal 2005 increase in investment income was the result of interest earned on proceeds received from the sale of our limited-service lodging division in September 2004 and Miramonte Resort in December 2004. The majority of our $259.1 million of cash and cash equivalents at the end of fiscal 2005 was invested in federal tax-exempt short-term financial instruments. A portion of these funds was held by intermediaries during the fiscal year to facilitate potential tax deferral opportunities and earned taxable interest. The majority of the cash held by intermediaries was released to us in early March 2005 and was subsequently reinvested in federal tax-exempt short-term financial instruments. The remaining $28.6 million of cash held by intermediaries for tax deferral purposes at the end of the fiscal year was used to acquire a new hotel in early fiscal 2006.
Our interest expense totaled $14.9 million for fiscal 2005, representing a decrease of $1.7 million, or 10.0%, compared to fiscal 2004 interest expense of $16.5 million. The decrease in interest expense was primarily the result of paying off all of our outstanding short-term borrowings, consisting of commercial paper, with cash provided by operating and investing activities (including the sale of our limited-service lodging division). In addition, we capitalized interest related to the construction of our Chicago hotel totaling approximately $835,000 during fiscal 2005, compared to capitalized interest of $296,000 during fiscal 2004. We also continued to make scheduled payments on our long-term debt during the year, further reducing our interest expense.
Our continuing operations recognized gains on disposition of property and equipment of $2.2 million during fiscal 2005, compared to gains from continuing operations of $2.8 million during fiscal 2004. The fiscal 2005 gain was primarily the result of our sale of two outlots on existing theatre land parcels, a four-screen theatre in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin and an excess land parcel.
During fiscal 2005, we reported net equity losses from unconsolidated joint ventures of $1.1 million, compared to net equity losses of approximately $400,000 during the prior fiscal year. Losses during fiscal 2005 were primarily the result of preopening costs from our 50% ownership interest in Platinum Condominium Development, LLC and operating losses from our minority ownership interest in Cinema Screen Media.
We reported income tax expense on continuing operations for fiscal 2005 of $11.7 million, a decrease of $200,000, or 1.8%, compared to fiscal 2004. Our effective tax rate for continuing operations during fiscal 2005 was 37.5% compared to 39.2% in fiscal 2004. The decrease in our effective tax rate for continuing operations was the result of our previously described investments in federal tax-exempt short-term financial instruments.
Net earnings during fiscal 2005 included after-tax income from discontinued operations of $1.3 million, compared to $6.0 million during the prior year. Net earnings for fiscal 2005 also included an after-tax gain on sale of discontinued operations of $78.3 million, or $2.57 per share. A detailed discussion of these items is included in the Discontinued Operations section. Weighted average shares outstanding were 30.5 million during fiscal 2005 and 29.9 million during fiscal 2004.
Our aggregate capital expenditures, including the purchaseacquisitions and purchases of two hotels,interests in joint ventures were approximately $76$198 million during fiscal 2006, an increase over2007 compared to $77 million and $68 million during the prior two years, of approximately $12 million and $25 million, respectively. We currently anticipate that our fiscal 2008 capital expenditures, during fiscal 2007including potential purchases of interests in joint ventures (but excluding any potential acquisitions) may exceed $100be in the $60-$80 million with the increased capital spending funded by the remaining proceeds from the sale of our limited-service lodging division as well as additional proceeds from the expected sale of existing assets and specific project-related financing.range. We will, however, continue to monitor our operating results and economic and industry conditions so that we respond appropriately.
20
Our current strategic plans may include the following goals and strategies:
| • | After |
19
2120
The actual number, mix and timing of potential future new facilities and expansions and/or divestitures will depend, in large part, on industry and economic conditions, our financial performance and available capital, the competitive environment, evolving customer needs and trends and the potential availability of attractive acquisition and investment opportunities. It is likely that our growth goals will continue to evolve and change in response to these and other factors, and there can be no assurance that these current goals will be achieved. Each of our goals and strategies are subject to the various risk factors discussed earlier in our Form 10-K.
21
Our oldest and largestmost profitable division is our theatre division. The theatre division contributed 50.5%47.8% of our consolidated revenues from continuing operations and 67.5%68.6% of our consolidated operating income, excluding corporate items, during fiscal 2006.2007. The theatre division operates motion picture theatres in Wisconsin, Illinois, Ohio, Minnesota, Iowa and Minnesota,North Dakota and a family entertainment center in Wisconsin. The following tables set forth revenues, operating income, operating margin, screens and theatre locations for the last three fiscal years:
| Change F06 v. F05 | Change F05 v. F04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | 2004 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 146.0 | $ | 149.1 | $ | (3.1 | ) | -2.1 | % | $ | 155.7 | $ | (6.6 | ) | -4.2 | % | |||||||
| Operating income | 32.5 | 34.8 | (2.3 | ) | -6.6 | % | 38.9 | (4.1 | ) | -10.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Operating margin | 22.2 | % | 23.3 | % | 25.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Number of screens and locations at fiscal year-end (1) (2) | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theatre screens | 504 | 504 | 492 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Theatre locations | 45 | 45 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average screens per location | 11.2 | 11.2 | 10.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Change F07 v. F06 | Change F06 v. F05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2006 | Amt. | Pct. | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 156.5 | $ | 146.0 | $ | 10.5 | 7.2 | % | $ | 149.1 | $ | (3.1 | ) | -2.1 | % | ||||||||
| Operating income | 34.6 | 32.5 | 2.1 | 6.4 | % | 34.8 | (2.3 | ) | -6.6 | % | |||||||||||||
| Operating margin | 22.1 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Number of screens and locations at fiscal year-end(1)(2) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theatre screens | 608 | 504 | 504 | ||||||||
| Theatre locations | 50 | 45 | 45 | ||||||||
| Average screens per location | 12.2 | 11.2 | 11.2 | ||||||||
| (1) | Includes |
| (2) | Includes 23 budget screens at four locations in 2007, 20 budget screens at four locations in 2006 and 15 budget screens at three locations in |
22
The following table further breaks down the components of revenues for the theatre division for the last three fiscal years:
| Change F06 v. F05 | Change F05 v. F04 | Change F07 v. F06 | Change F06 v. F05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | 2004 | Amt. | Pct. | 2007 | 2006 | Amt. | Pct. | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Box office revenues | $ | 93.4 | $ | 96.2 | $ | (2.8 | ) | -2.8 | % | $ | 101.1 | $ | (4.9 | ) | -4.9 | % | $ | 98.2 | $ | 93.4 | $ | 4.8 | 5.1 | % | $ | 96.2 | $ | (2.8 | ) | -2.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Concession revenues | 45.5 | 45.8 | (0.3 | ) | -0.6 | % | 46.7 | (0.9 | ) | -2.0 | % | 49.0 | 45.5 | 3.5 | 7.7 | % | 45.8 | (0.3 | ) | -0.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other revenues | 7.1 | 7.1 | -- | -- | 7.9 | (0.8 | ) | -9.0 | % | 9.3 | 7.1 | 2.2 | 30.9 | % | 7.1 | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenues | $ | 146.0 | $ | 149.1 | $ | (3.1 | ) | -2.1 | % | $ | 155.7 | $ | (6.6 | ) | -4.2 | % | $ | 156.5 | $ | 146.0 | $ | 10.5 | 7.2 | % | $ | 149.1 | $ | (3.1 | ) | -2.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
The decreaseincrease in theatre division revenues and operating income and operating margin during fiscal 20062007 compared to the prior year was entirely due to decreased overalla strong film slate during our fiscal first and fourth quarters, new screens added during the year and the additional week of operations included in our fiscal 2007 results. The additional week of operations, which included the traditionally strong Memorial Day holiday weekend, contributed approximately $5.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively, to our theatre division revenues and operating income during fiscal 2007, excluding the theatres acquired during our fiscal 2007 fourth quarter.
On April 19, 2007, we acquired 11 owned and/or leased movie theatres with 122 screens in Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota and Iowa from Cinema Entertainment Corporation (CEC) and related parties for a purchase price of approximately $75.7 million. The assets purchased consisted primarily of land, buildings, leasehold improvements, equipment and goodwill and the transaction was funded by using available cash-on-hand and drawing from our current credit facility. We expect that the acquisition will be accretive to both fiscal 2008 earnings and cash flow. The CEC theatres contributed approximately $3.5 million and $650,000, respectively, to our theatre division revenues and operating income for the six weeks that we owned them during fiscal 2007, including the additional week of operations during our fiscal year.
22
Total theatre attendance increased 5.0% during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year. Fiscal 2007 attendance at our comparable theatres. Total theatre attendancetheatres increased approximately 1.3%, including the additional week of operations, but decreased 4.5% during fiscal 2006approximately 1.7% excluding the additional week, compared to the prior year. As noted earlier, our theatre division operating results were primarily impacted by an overall weaka stronger slate of movies during our fiscal 20062007 first quarter, compared toand fourth quarters offset a weaker fall and holiday period film line-up. A particularly strong first quarter the prior yearMay 2007 that included record Memorial Day and July 4th holiday weeks. Total theatre attendance decreased 13.7% during our fiscal 2006 first quarter comparedthe opening of three blockbuster film sequels to the prior year’s first quarter, significantly impacting our overall fiscal 2006 results due to the fact that the summer quarter has historically accounted for 35-40% of our total year divisional operating income. In fact, not one of our five highest grossing films during the fiscal 2006 first quarter –WarSpider-Man, Shrek andPirates of the Worlds, Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith, Batman Begins, Madagascar,and Charlie & The Chocolate FactoryCaribbean – performed as well as any of the previous summer’s top three films,Spider-Man 2, Shrek 2and Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. However, attendance increased 2.4% during the second half of our fiscal 2006, withmovie franchises contributed to very strong fourth quarter theatre operating income increasing 5.2% during the same time period as the quality of the movies improved.results.
Revenues for the theatre business and the motion picture industry in general are heavily dependent on the general audience appeal of available films, together with studio marketing, advertising and support campaigns and the maintenance of the current “windows” between the date a film is released in theatres and the date a motion picture is released to other channels, including video on-demand and DVD. These are factors over which we have no control. With no significant changeExcluding a relatively small number of changes in the number of competitive screens in our markets, with one exception (Columbus, Ohio), we believe that athe most significant factor contributing to these variations in attendance during fiscal 20062007 was the quantity and quality of film product released during the respective quarters compared to the films released during the same quarters last year. Additional factors that are difficult to measure but which may have had some continuing impact on attendance during fiscal 20062007 include piracy and the ongoing impact of DVDs and home entertainment options on consumer spending choices. Partially offsetting our reduced attendance was a 1.7% increase inIncreased average ticket prices can favorably impact box office revenues, but during fiscal 2007, our average ticket price during fiscal 2006only increased 0.2% compared to the prior year, attributable primarily to modestselected regional price increases.promotions and film product mix.
Consistent with prior years in which blockbusters accounted for a significant portion of our total box office, our top 15 performing films accounted for 36% of our fiscal 20062007 and 20052006 box office receipts. Only twoThree fiscal 20062007 films produced box office receipts in excess of $3 million for our circuit, compared to fivetwo films that reached that amount for us during the prior year. The following five fiscal 20062007 films accounted for over 17% of our total box office and produced the most box office receipts for our circuit:Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe, WarPirates of the Worlds, Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge ofCaribbean: Dead Man’s Chest,Spider-Man 3,Night at the SithMuseum,Shrek the ThirdandWedding CrashersCars. The quantity of films remained fairly constantshown in our theatres increased during fiscal 2006.2007, primarily due to an increase in film distributors and independent films. We played 189214 films at our theatres during fiscal 20062007 compared to 188189 during fiscal 2005. We2006. Based upon projected film availability, we are currently estimating that we will show approximately 185 to 195a similar number of films on our screens during fiscal 2008 as we did during fiscal 2007. Generally, an increase in the quantity of films increases the potential for more blockbusters in any given year.
23
Our average concession sales per person increased 4.2%2.4% during fiscal 20062007 compared to the prior year. AveragePricing and film product mix are the two primary factors that impact our average ticket price and concession sales per person are impacted by changes in concession pricing, types of films played and changes in our geographic mix of theatre locations. Onperson. For example, on average, films that appeal to families and teenagers generally produce better than average concession sales but a lower average ticket price compared to more adult-orientedadult-orientated film product. As an example,During fiscal 2007, our average concession sales per person increased by over 6% during our fiscal 20062007 third quarter only increased 0.7% compared to the same period last year when our top films includedHarry Potter,King Kong andChronicles of Narnia, all of which generally attracted a younger audience.
Our theatre division’s operating margin decreased slightly to 22.1% during fiscal 2007, compared to 22.2% in fiscal 2006, due in part to the impact of approximately $800,000 of preopening expenses related primarily to the opening of our Majestic theatre. In addition, our fiscal 2007 operating margin was negatively impacted by increased film rental costs, due primarily to the fact that our top films (which historically have higher film rental costs as a percentage of revenues) represented a higher percentage of our total box office during fiscal 2007. Other revenues, which include management fees, pre-show advertising income and family entertainment center revenues, increased during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year, favorably impacting our operating margin. Increased pre-show and lobby advertising income, which included a final payment from our former screen advertising partner, Cinema Screen Media, and a one-time fee associated with the termination of our management contract for three theatres in Chicago, Illinois contributed to the increase in other revenues. We hope to increase our operating margins in our theatre division during fiscal 2008 by reducing our film costs, increasing our ancillary revenues and increasing our food and beverage revenues.
23
We opened three new locations with 41 screens during fiscal 2007. A new 13-screen theatre, which includes anUltraScreen®, opened in November 2006 in Sturtevant, Wisconsin and replaced an increaseexisting five-screen owned theatre in Racine, Wisconsin that we closed in late September and an 8-screen leased theatre in Racine that we converted to a budget-oriented theatre. We also opened a new 12-screen theatre in November 2006 in Green Bay, Wisconsin which replaced an 8-screen leased theatre that we closed in the same market. In May 2007, we opened the previously described 16-screen Majestic theatre in Brookfield, Wisconsin, replacing two nearby theatres that had 17 screens. We also closed a 3-screen theatre in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a single screen theatre in Cedarburg, Wisconsin and a 5-screen theatre in Madison, Wisconsin during fiscal 2007 with minimal impact on our fiscal 2007 operating results. The impact of only 1.0%the new theatres on fiscal 2007 operating results was also not significant, due to the timing of the openings in the fiscal year and the fact that the first year includes preopening expenses. We expect all three new theatres to favorably impact fiscal 2008 operating results. We have identified two other theatres with 12 screens that we may close during the next year with minimal impact on operating results.
Box office receipts during the summer to-date for comparable theatres have essentially matched last year’s strong summer results, despite the fact that our fiscal 2008 first quarter does not include the Memorial Day weekend. Strong performances from films such asPirates of the Caribbean:At World’s End,Fantastic 4:Rise of the Silver Surfer,Ratatouille,Transformers,Harry Potterand the Order of the Phoenix, The Simpsons Movie andThe Bourne Ultimatum have contributed to our early fiscal 2008 results.
The decrease in theatre division revenues, operating income and operating margin during fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year was entirely due to decreased overall attendance at our comparable theatres. Total theatre attendance decreased 4.5% during fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year. Our theatre division operating results were primarily impacted by an overall weak slate of movies during our fourthfiscal 2006 first quarter, whencompared to a strong first quarter the prior year that included record Memorial Day and July 4th holiday weeks. Total theatre attendance decreased 13.7% during our fiscal 2006 first quarter compared to the prior year’s first quarter, significantly impacting our overall fiscal 2006 results due to the fact that the summer quarter has historically accounted for 35-40% of our total year divisional operating income. In fact, not one of our five highest grossing films during the fiscal 2006 first quarter –War of the Worlds,Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith,Batman Begins,Madagascar, andCharlie & The Chocolate Factory – performed as well as any of the previous summer’s top three films,Spider-Man 2,Shrek 2 andHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. However, attendance increased 2.4% during the second half of our fiscal 2006, with operating income increasing 5.2% during the same time period as the quality of the movies improved. Partially offsetting our reduced attendance was a 1.7% increase in our average ticket price during fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year, attributable primarily to modest price increases. Our average concession sales per person increased 4.2% during fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year.
Consistent with prior years in which blockbusters accounted for a significant portion of our total box office, our top pictures included15 performing films accounted for 36% of our fiscal 2006 and 2005 box office receipts. Only two fiscal 2006 films produced box office receipts in excess of $3 million for our circuit, compared to five films that reached that amount for us during the prior year. The DaVinci Codefollowing five fiscal 2006 films accounted for over 15% of our total box office and produced the most box office receipts for our circuit:Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe,War of the Worlds,Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith andMission Impossible 3Wedding Crashers. The quantity of films remained fairly constant during fiscal 2006. We played 189 films at our theatres during fiscal 2006 compared to 188 during fiscal 2005.
Our theatre division’s operating margin decreased to 22.2% during fiscal 2006, compared to 23.3% in fiscal 2005, due in part to the impact of our fixed expenses on our decreased box office receipts. In addition, our fiscal 2006 operating margin was negatively impacted by a one-time charge of approximately $500,000 related to a minor restructuring of our administrative and theatre supervision organization and a one-time impairment charge of approximately $500,000 related to theatres scheduled to close during fiscal 2007. Our overall concession costs and film rental costs as a percentage of revenues decreased during fiscal 2006. Other revenues which included management fees, pre-show advertising income and family entertainment center revenues, remained unchanged compared to the prior year. If our box office performance improves during fiscal 2007, we could potentially return our theatre division operating margins to fiscal 2005 levels.
As noted earlier in the Current Plans section of this discussion, we expect to add three new locations during fiscal 2007, ultimately replacing five existing theatres. The impact of these anticipated new theatres on fiscal 2007 operating results will likely be minimal, due to the timing of the openings later in the fiscal year and the fact that the first year will include preopening expenses. Excluding the existing theatres in Racine, Green Bay and Brookfield, Wisconsin that are expected to be replaced with the new locations previously noted, we have identified approximately six other theatres with up to 27 screens that we may close over the next two to three years with minimal impact on operating results. One three-screen theatre closed early in our fiscal 2007 first quarter.
We believe that we are strengthening our long-term competitive position with our aforementioned capital investments, but ultimately, our future operating performance will be dependent upon strong film product and the maintenance of suitable “windows” as referred to earlier. Box office receipts during the first half of the summer have exceeded last year’s summer results to-date, due to strong performances from films such asX-Men 3, Cars, Superman Returnsand Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest. Although it is difficult to predict future box office performance, we are hopeful that the remaining films of this summer, includingSnakes on a Plane, Talladega Nights:The Ballad of Ricky Bobby andThe Ant Bully, will perform favorably compared to prior year product. Our fiscal 2007 third quarter may have difficult comparisons (our top two pictures in fiscal 2006 played during our third quarter), but the end of our fiscal 2007 is expected to be very strong, with films such asSpider-Man 3, Shrek the ThirdandPirates of the Caribbean 3 all scheduled to open in May 2007. Our theatre division, in particular, is expected to benefit from our 53rd week during fiscal 2007, as it will include the traditionally strong Memorial Day weekend and the opening of the aforementionedPirates of the Caribbean 3.
The decrease in theatre division revenues, operating income and operating margin during fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year was entirely due to decreased overall attendance at our comparable theatres. During fiscal 2005, we converted our two former IMAX® screens into aSuperScreen™ (generally 45-65 feet wide) and our fifthUltraScreen (70-75 feet wide) and we opened eight new screens at existing theatres, including four screens in LaCrosse, Wisconsin, three screens in Oshkosh, Wisconsin and our sixth UltraScreen at a theatre in Oakdale, Minnesota. We also opened a 12-screen small-town prototype theatre in Saukville, Wisconsin during the fiscal 2005 fourth quarter. These new screens, plus screens added in fiscal 2004 that were not open for a full year last year, generated approximately $1.8 million of additional revenues during fiscal 2005. We closed two theatres with seven screens during fiscal 2005 and eliminated one screen at an existing theatre in conjunction with a project to convert two small auditoriums into one larger-capacity auditorium. Closing those screens along with several other screens we closed during fiscal 2004 negatively impacted comparisons of this year’s theatre division revenues to prior year results by $1.4 million, although our screen closings had a minimal impact on operating income.
24
Total theatre attendance decreased 7.5% during fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year and attendance at our comparable screens decreased 7.8%. After a very strong summer box office, which included record Memorial Day and July 4th holiday weeks, we experienced decreases in attendance during each of our last three fiscal quarters as compared to fiscal 2004 comparable periods. With no significant change in the number of competitive screens in our markets, we believe that a significant factor contributing to these variations in attendance during fiscal 2005 was the quality of film product released during the respective quarters compared to the films released during the same quarters last year. Due primarily to the unusually strong March and early April 2004 performance ofThe Passion of the Christ, attendance during our fiscal 2005 fourth quarter was nearly 20% below that of the prior year, despite the strong opening nine days of the final installment ofStar Wars in late May. Partially offsetting our reduced attendance was a 2.7% increase in our average ticket price during fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year, attributable primarily to modest price increases. Our average concession sales per person increased 5.9% during fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year.
Consistent with prior years in which blockbusters accounted for a significant portion of our total box office, our top 15 performing films accounted for 36% of our fiscal 2005 box office receipts, compared to 35% during fiscal 2004. No fiscal 2005 films produced box office receipts in excess of $4 million for our circuit, compared to three films that reached that amount for us during the prior year (Lord of the Rings: Return of the King, Finding Nemoand The Passion of the Christ). The following five fiscal 2005 films produced box office receipts in excess of $3 million:Spider-Man 2, Meet the Fockers, Shrek 2, The Incrediblesand Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. We played 188 films at our theatres during fiscal 2005 compared to 181 during fiscal 2004.
Our theatre division’s operating margin decreased to 23.3% during fiscal 2005, compared to 25.0% in fiscal 2004, due primarily to the impact of our fixed expenses on our decreased box office receipts. Our overall concession costs as a percentage of revenues decreased slightly during the current year, while our film rental costs remained essentially unchanged as a percentage of revenues. A decrease in other revenues, which included management fees, pre-show advertising income and family entertainment center revenues, also contributed to our lower operating margin. The decrease in other revenues compared to fiscal 2004 was primarily due to the fact that last year’s revenues (and resulting operating income and operating margin) were favorably impacted by an approximately $400,000 insurance settlement.
The hotels and resorts division contributed 49.1%51.9% of our consolidated revenues from continuing operations and 32.5%31.4% of our consolidated operating income, excluding corporate items, during fiscal 2006.2007. As of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, the hotels and resorts division owned and operated three full-service hotels in downtown Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a full-facility destination resort in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin and full-service hotels in Madison, Wisconsin, Kansas City, Missouri, Chicago, Illinois and Columbus, Ohio.Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. In addition, we managed five12 hotels, resorts and other properties for other owners. We alsoIncluded in the 12 properties managed for others are two hotels owned by joint ventures that we have a vacation ownership developmentminority interest in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin.and two condominium hotels where we own the public space. The following table sets forth revenues, operating income, operating margin and rooms data for the hotels and resorts division for the last three fiscal years (prior year revenues, operating income and operating margin have been restated to reflect the current presentation of the Miramonte Resort and Marcus Vacation Club timesharing operation as discontinued operations):
| Change F07 v. F06 | Change F06 v. F05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2006 | Amt. | Pct. | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 169.9 | $ | 141.9 | $ | 28.0 | 19.7 | % | $ | 116.5 | $ | 25.4 | 21.8 | % | |||||||||
| Operating income | 15.8 | 15.6 | 0.2 | 1.1 | % | 12.7 | 2.9 | 23.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Operating margin | 9.3 | % | 11.0 | % | 10.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Available rooms at fiscal year-end | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company-owned | 2,520 | 2,480 | 1,848 | ||||||||
| Management contracts with joint ventures | 423 | -- | -- | ||||||||
| Management contracts with condominium hotels | 480 | 225 | 225 | ||||||||
| Management contracts with other owners | 1,670 | 811 | 811 | ||||||||
| Total available rooms | 5,093 | 3,516 | 2,884 | ||||||||
Division revenues increased during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year due to improved overall performance from our comparable company-owned hotels and resorts, the addition of two new company-owned hotels for portions of the year, increased management fees from new contracts and shared revenues from a new condominium hotel opened during the year. Continued improvement in business travel and a particularly strong year for our downtown Chicago hotel contributed to our improved results. Our operating income increased despite approximately $7.0 million in start-up operating losses, including $4.5 million in preopening expenses associated primarily with our Oklahoma City Hilton Skirvin project, the new Las Vegas condominium hotel and the major renovation and rebranding of the InterContinental Milwaukee hotel. These projects also contributed to a lower operating margin during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year. The additional week of operations contributed approximately $3.2 million and $570,000, respectively, to our hotels and resorts division revenues and operating income during fiscal 2007.
The division’s total revenue per available room, or RevPAR, for comparable company-owned properties (excluding the Columbus Westin, InterContinental Milwaukee and Skirvin Hilton) increased 5.2% during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year. Our occupancy percentage (number of occupied rooms as a percentage of available rooms) decreased 0.1 percentage points and our average daily room rate, or ADR, increased 5.4% during fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 for these same properties. The relative lack of new hotel supply growth and continued strong business travel demand contributed to this ADR increase. According to data received from Smith Travel Research, comparable upper upscale hotels throughout the United States experienced a similar increase in RevPAR of 6.0% during our fiscal 2007.
25
| Change F06 v. F05 | Change F05 v. F04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | 2004 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 141.9 | $ | 116.5 | $ | 25.4 | 21.8 | % | $ | 112.3 | $ | 4.2 | 3.8 | % | |||||||||
| Operating income | 15.6 | 12.7 | 2.9 | 23.3 | % | 12.4 | 0.3 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Operating margin | 11.0 | % | 10.9 | % | 11.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Available rooms at fiscal year-end | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company-owned | 2,480 | 1,848 | 2,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Management contracts | 1,036 | 1,036 | 1,036 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total available rooms | 3,516 | 2,884 | 3,110 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Our Las Vegas condominium hotel project, the Platinum Hotel, opened in late October 2006. Start-up operating losses and preopening expenses, magnified by the fact that we were generally unable to rent a unit until after the condominium sale closed, negatively impacted our fiscal 2007 results. As manager of this hotel and now 100% owner of the public space (with all condominium units to be ultimately individually-owned), we expect the Platinum will contribute to revenues and operating income of our hotels and resorts division in several ways. In addition to earning a management fee equal to a share of room revenue, we are now reporting 100% of the revenues and profits (or losses) generated by the public space at this non-gaming, non-smoking hotel, including the restaurant, lounge, meeting space and spa.
Renovations of the historic Skirvin Hilton hotel were completed in late February and the 225-room property reopened during the first week of our fiscal 2007 fourth quarter, becoming our fifth historic hotel under management. As the principal equity partner in this complex public-private venture, the hotel is reported as a company-owned property and fiscal 2008 division revenues will be favorably impacted as a result. Our total equity investment in this venture was approximately $12.2 million, the majority of which is expected to be recouped from previously described federal and state historic tax credits related to this project. The remaining funds for this approximately $55 million project were provided by contributions from Oklahoma City, new markets tax credits and project-specific mortgage debt. Preopening costs from this project had a significant negative impact on our overall operating results during fiscal 2007. We expect this hotel to contribute positively to fiscal 2008 operating results.
In late April 2007, we sold the 186-room Westin Columbus hotel for $16.4 million, before transaction costs, into a joint venture formed by us and an entity sponsored by Chicago-based Waterton Commercial LLC. We own a 15% minority interest in the joint venture and will continue to manage the property under a long-term management agreement, as well as oversee a major, multi-million dollar renovation of the property. The sale of the Westin Columbus into a joint venture was contemplated when the property was initially acquired in May 2006. This hotel was included in our consolidated results for most of the fiscal year and contributed to our increased revenues and operating income during fiscal 2007. As a result of the sale, we will no longer include this hotel in our consolidated operating results and fiscal 2008 revenues and operating income will be slightly negatively impacted.
Six new management contracts were added during fiscal 2007. In June 2006, we agreed to provide hospitality management services to the new owner of our former vacation ownership development at Grand Geneva. In October 2006, we entered into an agreement to manage Brynwood Country Club in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and in November 2006, we assumed management of Resort Suites, a four-star 483-room destination resort in Scottsdale, Arizona owned by a subsidiary of Goldman Sachs. The new properties leverage our golf course and upscale resort management experience and should be excellent additions to our portfolio. In February 2007, we entered an agreement to manage the Sheraton Clayton Plaza Hotel St. Louis, a 257-room property in an upscale western suburb of St. Louis owned by another subsidiary of Goldman Sachs. We were also selected to manage an under-construction 256-room Hilton hotel in Bloomington, Minnesota, under a long-term contract with another owner. We are currently providing preopening and technical services for this project. The sixth contract added during fiscal 2007 is with another joint venture we formed with a fund sponsored by Waterton Commercial LLC to acquire the 237-room Sheraton Madison Hotel in Madison, Wisconsin. We also have a 15% minority interest in this joint venture and will manage the hotel and oversee a major renovation of the property. Although total revenues from an individual hotel management contract are significantly less than from an owned hotel, the operating margins are significantly higher due to the fact that all direct costs of operating the property are borne by the owner of the property. Management contracts provide us with an opportunity to increase our total number of rooms managed without a significant investment, thereby increasing our returns on equity from this division.
We also recently completed several capital projects at existing hotels that should enhance the long-term value of these properties. A significant renovation and repositioning of the Wyndham Milwaukee Center, including converting to the luxury InterContinental brand, was completed during our fiscal 2007 third quarter. The newly renovated lobby, ballroom, restaurant and bar opened late in our second quarter and a complete rooms renovation was completed in December 2006. As noted earlier, preopening expenses and start-up operating losses related to the repositioning of this hotel as a sophisticated, upscale property negatively impacted our fiscal 2007 results. Additional projects completed during fiscal 2007 include a 12,000 square foot conference center expansion at the Grand Geneva Resort and a new featured restaurant, the Mason Street Grill, at our Pfister Hotel. Preopening expenses for this restaurant, which has received very positive reaction from customers, also had a negative impact on fiscal 2007 results. A new spa and salon opened at the Pfister in April 2007. A major garage restoration project and a meeting and banquet space renovation currently underway at the Pfister will likely have a slight negative impact on that hotel’s fiscal 2008 operating results.
26
The near-term outlook for the future performance of this division continues to appear promising. Our advanced bookings for the early months of fiscal 2008 have been strong. Favorable comparisons to fiscal 2007 operating results at our newest hotels that experienced significant preopening expenses and start-up operating losses should benefit our fiscal 2008 results from this division. Although there is an increased number of proposed new hotels in several of our markets, including Milwaukee, supply growth during fiscal 2008 appears to be minimal. Subject to economic conditions that historically can have a significant impact on hotel demand, we currently expect continued improvement in our division operating results during fiscal 2008.
Division revenues and operating income increased during fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year due to improved overall performance from our five comparable company-owned hotels and resorts and the addition of three new company-owned hotels during the year. Continued improvement in business travel, particularly from the short-term transient business traveler, contributed to our improved results. Group business was inconsistent during fiscal 2006, particularly at our Grand Geneva Resort. The group business segment is very important to several of our properties, as this is a segment of our customer base that typically provides non-room revenues to our hotels and resorts which are a key to increasing profitability levels. Our operating income and operating margin increased despite over $500,000 in start-up and preopening costs associated with our Oklahoma City Hilton Skirvin project.
The division’s total revenue per available room, or RevPAR for comparable company-owned properties increased 6.8% during fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year. Our occupancy percentage (number of occupied rooms as a percentage of available rooms) increased 1.7 percentage points and our average daily room rate, or ADR increased 4.1% during fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. The relative lack of new hotel supply growth and continued improvement in business travel demand contributed to this ADR increase after several years of stagnant or declining rates at our hotels and throughout the hotel industry. According to data received from Smith Travel Research, comparable upper upscale hotels throughout the United States experienced an increase in RevPAR of 9.1% during our fiscal 2006. Hotels located in the Midwest, where all of our comparable hotels reside, generally did not achieve as high year-over-year RevPAR increases as those on the East and West Coasts.
During the first week of fiscal 2006, we purchased the 220-room Wyndham Milwaukee Center hotel for a total cash purchase price of $23.6 million. The hotel features 12,000 square feet of meeting space, on-site parking, a restaurant and two lounges and complements our other two downtown Milwaukee, Wisconsin hotels. We anticipate our major renovation of this property will begin in our fiscal 2007 second quarter. This renovation will likely have some negative impact on this hotel’s operating results during the renovation period.
We also opened another new hotel during the first week of fiscal 2006 — the Four Points by Sheraton Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile. This hotel features 226 units (including 130 suites), an indoor swimming pool and fitness center, high-tech meeting rooms and an on-site parking facility. It also will lease space to several area restaurants. Our operating results from this property contributed favorably to our year-over-year comparison to fiscal 2005, primarily due to significant preopening expenses incurred at this property during the fiscal 2005 fourth quarter. The initial guest response to thisWe added a third new company-owned hotel has exceeded our expectations to-date. We expect this hotel to benefit from favorable comparisons to fiscal 2006 during our fiscal 2007 first quarter due to preopening expenses incurred at this property during that period last year, as well as continued improvement in operating performance as the property continues to mature.
Onon May 2, 2006 when we purchased the historic Westin Columbus hotelHotel in downtown Columbus, Ohio for a total cash purchase price of $16.3 million. The Westin Columbus is a AAA four-diamond full-service historic hotel that currently includes 186 guest rooms and suites, more than 12,000 square feet of meeting, banquet and ballroom space, a restaurant and a cocktail lounge. We plan on remodeling the guest rooms and food and beverage facilities to further enhance the historic features of this hotel. We will consider adding a majority equity partner to this hotel in the future, while maintaining a long-term management contract, consistent with our previously stated preferred method of growth for our hotels and resorts division.
26
Construction is nearing completion on our Las Vegas condominium hotel joint venture, the Platinum Hotel & Spa, with the property currently expected to open around September 2006. The Platinum Hotel & Spa will feature 255 condo units, a luxury spa, indoor and outdoor swimming pools, restaurants, lounge, upscale bar and 8,440 square feet of meeting space, including a 4,500 square-foot rooftop terrace overlooking the Las Vegas Strip. The hotel will be located just over one block east of the Strip near Bellagio, Bally’s and Caesars Palace. The condo units were priced between $300,000 and $1.0 million. Our hotels and resorts division will manage a unit rental program for owners which will generate income for the owners from their units as well as associated management fees for us. As noted earlier in the Consolidated Financial Comparisons discussion, we will also recognize equity earnings and losses from our ongoing investment in this joint venture, including a potential development profit from this project.
During fiscal 2006, we also completed work on the creation of a public-private venture that will restore the historic Skirvin Hotel in Oklahoma City, the oldest existing hotel in Oklahoma. Renovation of this landmark hotel has begun, with a target opening date of February 2007. When completed, this hotel is expected to have 225 rooms and 25,000 square feet of meeting space and will be our fifth historic hotel, representing a particular area of expertise of our hotels and resorts division. We will be the principal equity partner in this venture and, as a result, the hotel will be reported as a company-owned hotel when opened. We currently anticipate that our total equity investment in this venture will be approximately $10 million, the majority of which will be recouped during fiscal 2007 from previously described federal and state historic tax credits related to this project. The remaining funds for this nearly $50 million project are being provided by contributions from Oklahoma City, new markets tax credits and non-recourse project debt. We expect this project to have a significant negative impact on fiscal 2007 operating results as a result of initial start-up, financing and preopening costs that will be expensed prior to the hotel opening. Once completed, we expect this hotel to contribute positively to fiscal 2008 operating results.
The near-term outlook for the future performance of this division remains promising. Group business, which was inconsistent during fiscal 2006, particularly at our Grand Geneva Resort, appears to be improving. Our advanced bookings for the early months of fiscal 2007 are very encouraging. The group business segment is very important to several of our properties, as this is a segment of our customer base that typically provides non-room revenues to our hotels and resorts which are a key to increasing profitability levels. Subject to economic conditions and the potential negative impact of the start-up costs associated with new hotel projects, we currently expect continued improvement in our division operating results during fiscal 2007.
We continue to endeavor to maintain our properties consistent with our traditional high standards, making capital investments necessary to improve operating results in the future. In addition to normal maintenance projects at all of our properties, several significant improvements were made to our Grand Geneva Resort & Spa during fiscal 2006, including golf course improvements and a renovation of its front entrance and restaurants. We have currently begun and are considering several additional projects at the Grand Geneva and at our Pfister Hotel during fiscal 2007 in order to further enhance the value of those properties, including adding additional convention space and a significantly enhanced outdoor pool complex to the Grand Geneva and a new restaurant, spa and salon to the Pfister Hotel. As noted in the Current Plans section of this discussion, we also continue to explore several new growth opportunities, with a focus on attempting to expand our hotel management business. We recently expanded our internal development team during fiscal 2006 in order to help facilitate our future growth.
Division revenues increased during fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year due to revenue increases at all five of our company-owned hotels and resorts, with the largest improvements attributed to our newest hotels (the Hotel Phillips in Kansas City, Missouri and the Hilton Madison at Monona Terrace) and our business travel-oriented Pfister Hotel. Increased food and beverage revenues also contributed to our fiscal 2005 increase in overall revenues. Operating income increased during fiscal 2005 despite over $600,000 of start-up losses and preopening expenses associated with our downtown Chicago hotel project.
27
The division’s total RevPAR for continuing company-owned properties increased 4.2% during fiscal 2005 compared to the prior year. Our occupancy percentage increased 2.0 percentage points and our ADR increased 1.0% during fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004. Our fiscal year ended on a very strong note, as our RevPAR increased 14.2% during our fiscal 2005 fourth quarter compared to the same period last year. Our occupancy percentage increased over four percentage points and our ADR increased nearly 7% during this last quarter. According to data received from Smith Travel Research, comparable upper upscale hotels experienced an increase in RevPAR of 8.6% during our fiscal 2005.
Despite a brief decline in group travel during our fiscal 2005 third quarter, group bookings were strong during fiscal 2005, particularly during our fourth quarter. The leisure customer segment continued to perform well for us and the individual business travel segment continued to show steady improvement, as evidenced by the strong performance of our Pfister Hotel.
During the fiscal 2004 third quarter, we announced that we had entered into a joint venture with the developer of the Timber Ridge Lodge to develop a luxury condominium hotel just off the Las Vegas Strip, the The Platinum Hotel & Spa. We contributed an initial $3.5 million to this joint venture during fiscal 2004 and an additional $3.9 million during fiscal 2005 as construction began.
On September 3, 2004,During fiscal 2005, we sold substantially all of the assets of our limited-service lodging division to La Quinta Corporation of Dallas, Texas for a total purchase price of approximately $415 million in cash. La Quinta purchased our Baymont Inns & Suites, Woodfield Suitescash, excluding transaction costs, and Budgetel Inns brands, substantially allreported a significant after-tax gain of the division’s real estate and related assets and assumed the operation of 90 company-owned and operated Baymont Inns & Suites, seven Woodfield Suites, one Budgetel Inn and the 87-unit Baymont franchise system (including four joint venture Baymont Inns & Suites that were excluded from the transaction and became franchisees). The total purchase price noted above included approximately $19$74.7 million of proceeds related to theon sale of four joint venture properties to LaQuinta.discontinued operations. At the time of the sale, a portion of salethe sales proceeds was held in escrow pending completion of certain customary transfer requirements on several locations. During fiscal 2006, the necessary transfer requirements for the six remaining escrowed locations were met and one of the three remaining joint venture properties was sold. As a result, additional net proceeds of $25.0 million were received and additional after-tax gains on sale of discontinued operations of $7.8 million were recognized during fiscal 2006. Our combined two-year net proceeds from this transaction, before the payment of income taxes resulting from the gain on sale, were $390.4 million, net of transaction costs and excluding proceeds related to the sale of joint venture properties. As a result, we reported a combined two-year after-tax gain on sale of discontinued operations of $82.5 million.
27
We have accounted for the results of our limited-service lodging division as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements for all years presented. The following table sets forth revenues, operating income (loss), income (loss) from discontinued operations and gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of applicable taxes, for our limited-service lodging division for the last three fiscal years:
| Change F06 v. F05 | Change F05 v. F04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | 2004 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 0.6 | $ | 43.5 | $ | (42.9 | ) | -98.6 | % | $ | 128.1 | $ | (84.6 | ) | -66.1 | % | |||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (1.6 | ) | 5.7 | (7.3 | ) | -127.5 | % | 14.3 | (8.6 | ) | -60.0 | % | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) from | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | (1.1 | ) | 3.0 | (4.1 | ) | -137.5 | % | 7.9 | (4.9 | ) | -62.0 | % | |||||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | 7.8 | 74.7 | (66.9 | ) | -89.6 | % | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
28
| Change F07 v. F06 | Change F06 v. F05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2006 | Amt. | Pct. | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.6 | $ | (0.5 | ) | -80.5 | % | $ | 43.5 | $ | (42.9 | ) | -98.6 | % | |||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (0.2 | ) | (1.6 | ) | 1.4 | 90.1 | % | 5.7 | (7.3 | ) | -127.5 | % | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) from | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | (0.5 | ) | (1.1 | ) | 0.6 | 57.1 | % | 3.0 | (4.1 | ) | -137.5 | % | |||||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain (loss) on sale of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | (0.3 | ) | 7.8 | (8.1 | ) | -103.1 | % | 74.7 | (66.9 | ) | -89.6 | % | |||||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Our fiscal 2007 and 2006 operating results included results from the remaining joint venture Baymont Inns & Suites that were excluded from the sale and are now operating as Baymont franchises. We are actively exploring opportunities to sell the remaining two properties and, as a result, we continue to include their operating results in discontinued operations. Our fiscal 2006 loss from discontinued operations included a one-time charge to earnings related to the costs associated with exiting leased office space for our former limited-service lodging division.
Operating results of the limited-service lodging division for Our fiscal 2005 operating results included 14 weeks of operationoperations prior to completion of the sale. Results reported subsequent to September 3, 2004 included various remaining costs associated with the limited-service lodging division, as well as results from four of our joint venture Baymont Inns & Suites that were excluded from the transactionsale and began operating as Baymont franchises. One of the original four joint venture properties excluded from the sale to LaQuinta was sold early in our fiscal 2005 third quarter and another was sold during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The limited-service lodging division’s operating income and income from discontinued operations, net of applicable taxes, during fiscal 2005 included various costs associated with exiting the business, including approximately $1.8 million of severance-related costs.business.
On December 1, 2004,During fiscal 2005, we sold the Miramonte Resort for $28.7 million in cash, before transaction costs. The assets sold consisted primarily of land, building and equipment. As a result of this transaction, we reported aan after-tax gain of $5.9 million before tax and $3.6 million after tax during fiscal 2005. Settlement of a dispute with a contractor during fiscal 2006 resulted in a $135,000 before$90,000 after tax reduction in the reported gain. Operating results for the Miramonte Resort for fiscal 2005 included almost 27 weeks of operation prior to completion of the sale.
We have accounted for the results of the Miramonte Resort, which had previously been included in our hotels and resorts segment results, as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements for all years presented. The following table sets forth revenues, operating loss, loss from discontinued operations and gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of applicable taxes, for the Miramonte Resort for the last three fiscal years:
| Change F06 v. F05 | Change F05 v. F04 | Change F07 v. F06 | Change F06 v. F05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | 2004 | Amt. | Pct. | 2007 | 2006 | Amt. | Pct. | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | -- | $ | 3.4 | $ | (3.4 | ) | -100.0 | % | $ | 6.5 | $ | (3.1 | ) | -47.1 | % | $ | -- | $ | - | $ | - | -- | $ | 3.4 | $ | (3.4 | ) | -100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating loss | (0.1 | ) | (2.2 | ) | 2.1 | 95.7 | % | (2.8 | ) | 0.6 | 22.9 | % | -- | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | 100.0 | % | (2.2 | ) | 2.1 | 95.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | (0.1 | ) | (1.3 | ) | 1.2 | 95.3 | % | (1.7 | ) | 0.4 | 23.0 | % | -- | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | 100.0 | % | (1.3 | ) | 1.2 | 95.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain (loss) on sale of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | (0.1 | ) | 3.6 | (3.7 | ) | -102.5 | % | -- | -- | -- | -- | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | 100.0 | % | 3.6 | (3.7 | ) | -102.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating results for the Miramonte Resort for fiscal 2005 included almost 27 weeks of operation prior to completion of the sale, generally during the slowest seasons (summer and fall) for that property. Operating results for the period the hotel was open during fiscal 2005 benefited from increased revenues as a result of its then recently opened spa.28
Early in our fiscal 2007 first quarter, we sold the remaining timeshare inventory of our Marcus Vacation Club at Grand Geneva vacation ownership development to Orange Lake Resort & Country Club of Orlando, Florida. The assets sold consisted primarily of real estate and development costs — Orange Lake acquired the remaining 34 units of the 136-unit Marcus Vacation Club property. Our hotels and resorts division will continue to provide hospitality management services for the property and continues to hold notes receivable from prior buyers of timeshare units, but will no longer be in the business of selling timeshare units to customers.units.
29
We have accounted for the results of the Marcus Vacation Club, which had previously been included in our hotels and resorts segment results, as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2006 and have restated prior year results to conform with the current year presentation.all years presented. The following table sets forth revenues, operating loss, and loss from discontinued operations and gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of applicable taxes, for the Marcus Vacation Club for the last three fiscal years:
| Change F06 v. F05 | Change F05 v. F04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | 2004 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4.8 | $ | 5.6 | $ | (0.8 | ) | -14.4 | % | $ | 5.7 | $ | (0.1 | ) | -1.1 | % | |||||||
| Operating loss | (1.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.5 | ) | -93.8 | % | (0.2 | ) | (0.4 | ) | -254.4 | % | |||||||||
| Loss from | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | (0.7 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.4 | ) | -113.0 | % | (0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | -253.1 | % | |||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating results from our timeshare operation were negatively impacted in each of the last two years by new rules related to telephone solicitation of potential customers. With just one vacation ownership development in our portfolio and no ability to leverage the cost of alternate marketing methods across multiple developments, this resulted in significantly increased marketing and selling costs for our operation.
| Change F07 v. F06 | Change F06 v. F05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2006 | Amt. | Pct. | 2005 | Amt. | Pct. | |||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4.0 | $ | 4.8 | $ | (0.8 | ) | -18.1 | % | $ | 5.6 | $ | (0.8 | ) | -14.4 | % | |||||||
| Operating loss | -- | (1.1 | ) | 1.1 | 97.0 | % | (0.6 | ) | (0.5 | ) | -93.8 | % | |||||||||||
| Loss from | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | -- | (0.7 | ) | 0.7 | 97.2 | % | (0.3 | ) | (0.4 | ) | -113.0 | % | |||||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | 0.1 | -- | 0.1 | N/A | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||
| (net of income taxes) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Our movie theatre and hotels and resorts businesses each generate significant and relatively consistent daily amounts of cash, subject to previously noted seasonality, because each segment’s revenue is derived predominantly from consumer cash purchases. We believe that these relatively consistent and predictable cash sources, as well as the availability of $125$55 million of unused credit lines at fiscal 20062007 year-end, should be adequate to support the ongoing operational liquidity needs of our businesses.businesses during fiscal 2008.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $64.9 million during fiscal 2007, an increase of $25.3 million compared to $39.6 million during fiscal 2006. The increase was due primarily to increased earnings (excluding gains from sales of property, equipment and other assets and gains from sale of discontinued operations) and deferred taxes, as well as favorable timing in the collection of accounts and notes receivable and other current assets, partially offset by unfavorable timing in the payment of other accrued liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities during fiscal 2007 totaled $72.3 million compared to $20.5 million during fiscal 2006, an increase of $51.8 million. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily the result of increased capital expenditures and acquisitions, decreased cash received from intermediaries and increased purchases of additional interests in joint ventures, partially offset by increased cash proceeds from disposals of property, equipment and other assets and increased proceeds from the sale of condominium units. Our fiscal 2007 results included $95.7 million of net proceeds from the sale of condominium units at our Platinum Hotel in Las Vegas. Our fiscal 2006 results included $25.0 million of net proceeds from the disposal of our limited-service lodging division. In addition, fiscal 2006 results included $26.8 million of cash received from intermediaries related to net proceeds received during fiscal 2005 from the sale of the Miramonte Resort. Cash proceeds from the disposals of property, equipment and other assets totaled $32.2 million and $6.9 million during fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. The cash proceeds received during fiscal 2007 were primarily the result of our sale of the Westin Columbus, a former theatre property, four former restaurant locations and several excess parcels of land. The cash proceeds received during fiscal 2006 were primarily the result of our sale of a non-operating real estate development, a former restaurant location and several excess parcels of land. In addition, during fiscal 2007 and 2006, we received $4.0 and $7.4 million, respectively, from Oklahoma City in conjunction with their contribution to the renovation of the Skirvin Hilton Hotel. The city’s total contribution of over $11 million was reported as a reduction to our property and equipment and will reduce future depreciation expense for this asset.
29
Total capital expenditures and acquisitions (including normal continuing capital maintenance projects) totaled $186.8 million during fiscal 2007, including our acquisition of the CEC theatres, compared to $75.5 million of capital expenditures and acquisitions incurred in fiscal 2006 (including the acquisitions of the Wyndham Milwaukee Center and Westin Columbus). We incurred approximately $70.6 million of capital expenditures during fiscal 2007 in our hotels and resorts division, including costs associated with the Skirvin Hilton renovation, InterContinental Milwaukee renovation and projects at the Grand Geneva Resort and Pfister Hotel. In addition to the CEC acquisition for $75.7 million, we incurred approximately $39.7 million of capital expenditures during fiscal 2007 in our theatre division, including costs associated with the three new theatres opened during the year. In addition to capital expenditures, we also incurred $11.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively, during fiscal 2007 and 2006 in connection with the purchase of interests in joint ventures, including our interests in the Platinum Hotel, the Sheraton Madison and the Columbus Westin. During fiscal 2006, we incurred $65.8 million of capital expenditures for our hotels and resorts division, the majority of which was related to our purchases of the aforementioned two hotels, completion of our Chicago hotel construction and beginning of construction on the Oklahoma City hotel project. We also incurred fiscal 2006 capital expenditures of $8.4 million in our theatre division, including costs associated with a parking structure at one of our Chicago-area theatres. Estimated current planned fiscal 2008 capital expenditures, which may be in the $60-$80 million range, are described in greater detail in the Current Plans section of this discussion.
Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2007 totaled $15.1 million, compared to $243.6 million in fiscal 2006, with the decrease primarily related to our $214.6 million special dividend paid during our fiscal 2006 fourth quarter. During fiscal 2007, we received $111.4 million of net proceeds from the issuance of notes payable and long-term debt, compared to $5.6 million during fiscal 2006. The proceeds during fiscal 2007 were primarily from debt related to the Skirvin Hilton and borrowings on commercial paper and our revolving credit facility used to finance the CEC theatre acquisition. Fiscal 2006 proceeds were from mortgage debt related to our downtown Chicago hotel. We made total principal payments on notes payable and long-term debt of $111.3 million and $27.3 million during fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively, representing the payment of current maturities during both years and payment of construction loans on the Platinum Hotel of $81.9 during fiscal 2007. As a result, our total debt (including current maturities) increased to $256.7 million at the close of fiscal 2007, compared to $176.5 million at the end of fiscal 2006. Our debt-capitalization ratio was 0.45 at May 31, 2007, compared to 0.37 at the prior fiscal year-end. Based upon our current expectations for fiscal 2008 capital expenditure levels and potential asset sales proceeds, we anticipate our long-term debt total and debt-capitalization ratio will not change significantly during fiscal 2008. Our actual long-term debt total and debt-capitalization ratio at the end of fiscal 2008 will likely be dependent upon our actual capital expenditures, asset sales proceeds and equity transactions during the year.
During fiscal 2007, we repurchased 411,000 of our common shares for approximately $8.1 million in conjunction with the exercise of stock options and purchase of shares in the open market, compared to 313,000 of common shares repurchased for approximately $6.5 million during fiscal 2006. Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 4.7 million shares of our outstanding common stock. As of May 31, 2007, approximately 1.1 million shares remained available under this repurchase authorization. Any additional repurchases are expected to be executed on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions depending upon a number of factors, including prevailing market conditions.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $39.6 million during fiscal 2006, an increase of $52.6 million compared to net cash used in operating activities of $13.0 million during fiscal 2005. The increase was due primarily to $75.7 million in income taxes, including a reduction in deferred income taxes, during fiscal 2005 related principally to the gain on sale of discontinued operations, as well as a difference in the timing of payments of accounts payable and taxes other than income, partially offset by unfavorable comparisons in collections of accounts and notes receivable and other current assets.
30
Net cash used in investing activities during fiscal 2006 totaled $20.5 million, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $302.4 million during fiscal 2005. Our fiscal 2005 results included $365.4 million of net proceeds from the disposal of our limited-service lodging division, compared to $25.0 million during fiscal 2006. In addition, fiscal 2005 results included $28.5 million of net proceeds from the sale of the Miramonte Resort, all of which was invested with intermediaries to facilitate potential tax deferral opportunities. The cash held by intermediaries was released shortly after year-end, a portion of which was used to purchase the Wyndham Milwaukee Center hotel. Cash proceeds from the disposals of other property and equipment totaled $6.9 million and $4.2 million during fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. The cash proceeds received during fiscal 2006 were primarily the result of our sale of a non-operating real estate development, a former restaurant location and several excess parcels of land. The cash proceeds received during fiscal 2005 were primarily the result of our sale of two outlots on existing theatre land parcels, a four-screen theatre and an excess land parcel. In addition, during fiscal 2006, we received $7.4 million from Oklahoma City in conjunction with their contribution to the renovation of the Hilton Skirvin Hotel. Upon completion of this project, the city’s total contribution, which is expected to be over $11 million, will be reported as a reduction to our property and equipment and will reduce future depreciation expense for this asset.
30
Total capital expenditures (including normal continuing capital maintenance projects) totaled $75.5 million during fiscal 2006, including the previously noted acquisitions of the Wyndham Milwaukee Center and Westin Columbus, compared to $63.4 million of capital expenditures incurred in fiscal 2005. We incurred $65.8 million of capital expenditures during fiscal 2006 in our hotels and resorts division the majority of which was relatedcompared to our purchases of the aforementioned two hotels, completion of our Chicago hotel construction and beginning of construction on the Oklahoma City hotel project.$21.5 million for this division during fiscal 2005. In addition, we incurred $8.4 million of capital expenditures during fiscal 2006 in our theatre division including costs associated with a parking structure at onecompared to $35.9 million of capital expenditures for our Chicago-area theatres, Project 2010 renovation costs and beginning the construction on our new Racine-area theatre.theatre division during fiscal 2005. In addition to capital expenditures, we also incurred $1.7 million and $4.3 million, respectively, during fiscal 2006 and 2005 in connection with the purchase of interests in joint ventures, including our interest in the Las Vegas project for our hotels and resorts division and our interest in a theatre advertising company for our theatre division. During fiscal 2005, we incurred $35.9 million of capital expenditures for our theatre division, $21.5 million for our hotels and resorts division projects and $4.5 million for discontinued operation projects. Estimated current planned fiscal 2007 capital expenditures, which may exceed $100 million, are described in greater detail in the Current Plans section of this discussion.ventures.
Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2006 totaled $243.6 million, compared to $40.0 million in fiscal 2005, with the increase primarily related to the previously described $214.6 million special dividend paid during our fiscal 2006 fourth quarter. During fiscal 2006, we received $5.6 million of net proceeds from the issuance of notes payable and long-term debt, compared to $13.6 million during fiscal 2005. The proceeds during both fiscal years were from mortgage debt related to theour downtown Chicago development.hotel. We made total principal payments on notes payable and long-term debt of $27.3 million and $53.7 million during fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing the payment of current maturities during both years and payment of borrowings on commercial paper and revolving credit facilities with the excess operating cash flow and sales proceeds available during fiscal 2005. As a result, our total debt (including current maturities) decreased to $176.5 million at the close of fiscal 2006, compared to $196.7 million at the end of fiscal 2005. Our debt-capitalization ratio was 0.37 at May 25, 2006, compared to 0.28 at the prior fiscal year-end. Based upon our current expectations for fiscal 2007 capital expenditure levels and potential asset sales proceeds, as well as the expected addition of debt related to the Oklahoma City hotel, we anticipate our long-term debt total will increase slightly during fiscal 2007. We also currently expect our debt-capitalization ratio to increase slightly as a result. Our actual long-term debt total and debt-capitalization ratio at the end of fiscal 2007 will be dependent upon our actual capital expenditures and asset sales proceeds during the year.
During fiscal 2006, we repurchasedpurchased 313,000 of our common shares for approximately $6.5 million in conjunction with the exercise of stock options and purchase of shares in the open market, compared to 28,000 of common shares repurchased for approximately $518,000 during fiscal 2005. Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 4.7 million shares of our outstanding common stock. As of May 25, 2006, approximately 1.6 million shares remained available under this repurchase authorization. Any additional repurchases are expected to be executed on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions depending upon a number of factors, including prevailing market conditions.
31
We have obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt and operating leases. The following schedule details these obligations at May 25, 200631, 2007 (in thousands):
| Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Less Than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | After 5 Years | |||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | $ | 176,512 | $ | 53,402 | $ | 63,950 | $ | 29,032 | $ | 30,128 | |||||||
| Notes payable | 500 | 500 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
| Operating lease obligations | 65,241 | 2,523 | 4,903 | 5,020 | 52,795 | ||||||||||||
| Construction commitments | 41,356 | 41,356 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 283,609 | $ | 97,781 | $ | 68,853 | $ | 34,052 | $ | 82,923 | |||||||
31
| Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Less Than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | After 5 Years | |||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | $ | 256,675 | $ | 57,250 | $ | 116,420 | $ | 28,570 | $ | 54,435 | |||||||
| Notes payable | 239 | 239 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
| Operating lease obligations | 90,808 | 3,521 | 7,240 | 7,163 | 72,884 | ||||||||||||
| Construction commitments | 7,075 | 7,075 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 354,797 | $ | 68,085 | $ | 123,660 | $ | 35,733 | $ | 127,319 | |||||||
Additional detail describing our long-term debt is included in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements.
As of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, we had no additional material purchase obligations other than those created in the ordinary course of business related to property and equipment, which generally have terms of less than 90 days. We also have long-term obligations related to our employee benefit plans, which are discussed in detail in Note 7 of our consolidated financial statements.
We guarantee debt of our 50% unconsolidated joint ventures and other entities. Our joint venture partners also guarantee all or a portion of this same debt. During fiscal 2004, we paid $930,000 in connection with our guarantee of debt on a joint venture that was liquidated.
We have approximately sevensix and one-half years remaining on a ten and one-half year office lease. During fiscal 2006, the lease was amended in order to exit leased office space for our former limited-service lodging division. To induce the landlord to amend the lease, we guaranteed the lease obligations of the new tenant of the relinquished space throughout the remaining term of the lease.
The following schedule details our guarantee obligations at May 25, 200631, 2007 (in thousands):
| Expiration by Period | Expiration by Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Less Than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | After 5 Years | Total | Less Than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | After 5 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt guarantee obligations | $ | 5,034 | $ | 199 | $ | 4,835 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 4,835 | $ | 1,650 | $ | 3,185 | $ | -- | $ | -- | ||||||||||||||
| Lease guarantee obligations | 3,271 | 401 | 831 | 871 | 1,168 | 2,854 | 408 | 846 | 887 | 713 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total guarantee obligations | $ | 8,305 | $ | 600 | $ | 5,666 | $ | 871 | $ | 1,168 | $ | 7,689 | $ | 2,058 | $ | 4,031 | $ | 887 | $ | 713 | ||||||||||||||
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and we manage our exposure to this market risk by monitoring available financing alternatives.
Variable interest rate debt outstanding as of May 25, 200631, 2007 was $25.0$95.9 million, carried an average interest rate of 7.3%6.1% and represented 14.2%37.4% of our total debt portfolio. Our earnings are affected by changes in short-term interest rates as a result of our borrowings under our revolving credit agreements and floating-rate mortgages.
Fixed interest rate debt totaled $151.5$160.8 million as of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, carried an average interest rate of 7.3%6.4% and represented 85.8%62.6% of our total debt portfolio. Fixed interest rate debt included the following: senior notes bearing interest semiannually at fixed rates ranging from 6.66% to 7.93%, maturing in fiscal 2009 through 2014; and fixed rate mortgages and other debt instruments bearing interest from 6.50%1.00% to 8.22%6.96%, maturing in 2010 through 2025.2036. The fair value of our long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk. Generally, the fair market value of our fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The fair value of our $148.1$120.0 million of senior notes is approximately $151.5$122.4 million. Based upon the respective rate and prepayment provisions of our remaining fixed interest rate mortgage and unsecured term note at May 25, 2006,31, 2007, the carrying amounts of such debt approximates fair value.
32
The variable interest rate debt and fixed interest rate debt outstanding as of May 25, 200631, 2007 matures as follows (in thousands):
| 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable interest rate | $ | 25,030 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 25,030 | |||||||||
| Fixed interest rate | 28,372 | 31,964 | 31,986 | 14,506 | 14,526 | 30,128 | 151,482 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total debt | $ | 53,402 | $ | 31,964 | $ | 31,986 | $ | 14,506 | $ | 14,526 | $ | 30,128 | $ | 176,512 | |||||||||
32
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable interest rate | $ | 25,514 | $ | 70,359 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 95,873 | |||||||||
| Fixed interest rate | 31,736 | 31,779 | 14,282 | 14,283 | 14,287 | 54,435 | 160,802 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total debt | $ | 57,250 | $ | 102,138 | $ | 14,282 | $ | 14,283 | $ | 14,287 | $ | 54,435 | $ | 256,675 | |||||||||
We periodically enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to interest rate changes. These swaps involve the exchange of fixed and variable interest rate payments without exchanging the notional principal amount. Payments or receipts on the agreements are recorded as adjustments to interest expense. We had no outstanding interest rate swap agreements at May 25, 2006.31, 2007. On May 3, 2002, we terminated a swap agreement that had effectively converted $25 million of our borrowings under revolving credit agreements from floating-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. The fair value of the swap on the date of the termination resulted in a liability of $2.8 million. The remaining loss of $184,000 ($111,000 net of tax), previously included in other comprehensive income, was reclassified into earnings as interest expense during fiscal 2006 in conjunction with the end of the original life of the hedge.
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, insurance reserves, carrying value of investments in long-lived assets, intangible assets, income taxes, pensions, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
33
33
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004)(SFAS No. 123R), “Share Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123R123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123R123(R) is similar to the approach in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123R123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their grant date fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
We will adopt SFASPrior to May 26, 2006, we accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 123R at25. Accordingly, no compensation expense was recognized for stock options because all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. As discussed in Note 6 of our consolidated financial statements, we began expensing the fair value of stock options on May 26, 2006, the beginning of our fiscal 2007 year, when we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method. This transition method does not result in the restatement of previously issued financial statements.
34
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) on May 26, 2006, our earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and net earnings for fiscal year.2007 were lower by $1.1 million and $830,000, respectively, than if we had been allowed to continue to account for stock-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. We expect thatwill continue to expense awards of non-vested stock over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of our common stock at the date of grant. At the end of fiscal 2007, total remaining unearned compensation related to non-vested stock compensation expensewas approximately $941,000, which will be similar toamortized over the fiscalweighted-average remaining service period of 8.8 years.
On May 26, 2006, pro-forma stock compensation expense included in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2004, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position 04-2, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions” (the SOP) and the FASB amendedwe adopted SFAS No. 66, “Accounting158, “Employers’ Accounting for SalesDefined Benefit Pension and other Postretirement Plans,” which requires us to recognize previously unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs in the statement of Real Estate,”financial position and to recognize future changes in these amounts in the year in which changes occur through comprehensive income. Additionally, we are required to measure the funded status of our plan as of the date of our year-end statement of financial position. The adoption of SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Project,” to exclude accounting for real estate time-sharing transactions from these statements. The SOP is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The impact of the SOP158 had no effect on our required reserves onconsolidated statement of earnings for the year ended May 31, 2007, or for any prior period presented, and it will not affect our remaining notes receivable for interval ownership is currently being evaluated.operating results in future periods.
In June 2006, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB interpretationInterpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement criteria for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The new standard will be effective for the Company in theour first quarter of fiscal 2008. The impactBased upon our initial review, we do not believe adoption of FIN 48 will have a material impact on our overall financial results is currently being evaluated.position.
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
The information required by this item is set forth in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” above.
34
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 25, 2006.31, 2007. The Company’s auditors, Ernst & Young, LLP, have issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. That attestation report is set forth immediately following this report.
| Stephen H. Marcus | Douglas A. Neis |
| Chairman of the Board, President and | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| Chief Executive Officer |
35
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
of the Marcus Corporation
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that The Marcus Corporation (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Marcus Corporation as of May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 25, 2006,31, 2007, and our report dated August 4, 200610, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 4, 200610, 2007
36
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
of The Marcus Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Marcus Corporation (the Company) as of May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 25, 2006.31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 25, 2006,31, 2007, in conformity with United StatesU. S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, on May 26, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based awards. Additionally, as discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, on May 31, 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting for defined benefit pension plans.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 25, 2006,31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 4, 200610, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 4, 200610, 2007
37
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||
| CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 34,528 | $ | 259,057 | $ | 12,018 | $ | 34,528 | ||||||||
| Cash held by intermediaries | 1,752 | 28,552 | 5,749 | 1,752 | ||||||||||||
| Accounts and notes receivable, net of reserves(Note 4) | 14,306 | 8,911 | 16,224 | 14,306 | ||||||||||||
| Receivables from joint ventures, net of reserves(Note 10) | 3,385 | 2,704 | 3,732 | 3,385 | ||||||||||||
| Refundable income taxes | 216 | 871 | 5,939 | 216 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes(Note 8) | 5,898 | 5,464 | 1,056 | 5,898 | ||||||||||||
| Condominium units held for sale(Note 10) | 7,320 | -- | ||||||||||||||
| Other current assets(Note 4) | 11,273 | 4,856 | 6,340 | 11,273 | ||||||||||||
| Assets of discontinued operations(Note 3) | 7,545 | 22,860 | 975 | 7,545 | ||||||||||||
| Total current assets | 78,903 | 333,275 | 59,353 | 78,903 | ||||||||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net(Note 4) | 450,529 | 398,748 | 559,785 | 450,529 | ||||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS: | ||||||||||||||||
| Investments in joint ventures(Note 10) | 7,487 | 6,658 | 1,868 | 7,487 | ||||||||||||
| Goodwill | 11,196 | 11,196 | 37,805 | 11,196 | ||||||||||||
| Other(Note 4) | 39,119 | 37,622 | 39,572 | 39,119 | ||||||||||||
| Total other assets | 57,802 | 55,476 | 79,245 | 57,802 | ||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 587,234 | $ | 787,499 | $ | 698,383 | $ | 587,234 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||||||||||
| Notes payable(Note 10) | $ | 500 | $ | 1,774 | $ | 239 | $ | 500 | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | 19,399 | 14,871 | 24,242 | 19,399 | ||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 11,064 | 8,507 | 11,215 | 11,064 | ||||||||||||
| Accrued compensation | 7,444 | 6,191 | 6,720 | 7,444 | ||||||||||||
| Other accrued liabilities(Note 4) | 14,887 | 13,046 | 24,746 | 15,137 | ||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt(Note 5) | 53,402 | 25,765 | 57,250 | 53,402 | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities of discontinued operations(Note 3) | 1,998 | 9,533 | 2,731 | 1,998 | ||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities | 108,694 | 79,687 | 127,143 | 108,944 | ||||||||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT(Note 5) | 123,110 | 170,888 | 199,425 | 123,110 | ||||||||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES(Note 8) | 27,946 | 26,614 | 29,376 | 27,946 | ||||||||||||
DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND OTHER(Note 7) | 26,161 | 16,649 | 22,930 | 25,911 | ||||||||||||
COMMITMENTS, LICENSE RIGHTS AND CONTINGENCIES(Note 9) | ||||||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY(Note 6): | ||||||||||||||||
| Preferred Stock, $1 par; authorized 1,000,000 shares; none issued | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
| Common Stock: | ||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock, $1 par; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued | ||||||||||||||||
| 22,235,822 shares in 2006 and 22,099,042 shares in 2005 | 22,236 | 22,099 | ||||||||||||||
| 22,299,925 shares in 2007 and 22,235,822 shares in 2006 | 22,300 | 22,236 | ||||||||||||||
| Class B Common Stock, $1 par; authorized 33,000,000 shares; | ||||||||||||||||
| issued and outstanding 8,953,691 shares in 2006 and | ||||||||||||||||
| 9,090,471 shares in 2005 | 8,954 | 9,091 | ||||||||||||||
| issued and outstanding 8,889,588 shares in 2007 and | ||||||||||||||||
| 8,953,691 shares in 2006 | 8,890 | 8,954 | ||||||||||||||
| Capital in excess of par | 45,911 | 45,481 | 46,438 | 45,911 | ||||||||||||
| Retained earnings | 231,907 | 425,941 | 255,727 | 231,907 | ||||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 112 | (532 | ) | (1,515 | ) | 112 | ||||||||||
| 309,120 | 502,080 | 331,840 | 309,120 | |||||||||||||
| Less unearned compensation on restricted stock | (293 | ) | (413 | ) | -- | (293 | ) | |||||||||
| Less cost of Common Stock in treasury (646,544 shares in 2006 and | ||||||||||||||||
| 857,088 shares in 2005 | (7,504 | ) | (8,006 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Less cost of Common Stock in treasury | ||||||||||||||||
| (795,335 shares in 2007 and | ||||||||||||||||
| 646,544 shares in 2006 | (12,331 | ) | (7,504 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 301,323 | 493,661 | 319,509 | 301,323 | ||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 587,234 | $ | 787,499 | $ | 698,383 | $ | 587,234 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
38
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(in thousands, except per share data)
| Year ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
| REVENUES: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rooms and telephone | $ | 75,871 | $ | 56,778 | $ | 55,095 | $ | 88,369 | $ | 75,871 | $ | 56,778 | ||||||||||
| Theatre admissions | 93,429 | 96,157 | 101,144 | 98,184 | 93,429 | 96,157 | ||||||||||||||||
| Theatre concessions | 45,496 | 45,785 | 46,696 | 49,018 | 45,496 | 45,785 | ||||||||||||||||
| Food and beverage | 41,162 | 36,576 | 34,940 | 49,183 | 41,162 | 36,576 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other revenues | 33,286 | 31,762 | 31,346 | 42,877 | 33,286 | 31,762 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenues | 289,244 | 267,058 | 269,221 | 327,631 | 289,244 | 267,058 | ||||||||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rooms and telephone | 27,852 | 22,726 | 21,694 | 32,949 | 27,852 | 22,726 | ||||||||||||||||
| Theatre operations | 73,527 | 75,560 | 77,944 | 81,085 | 73,527 | 75,560 | ||||||||||||||||
| Theatre concessions | 9,672 | 9,896 | 10,209 | 10,853 | 9,672 | 9,896 | ||||||||||||||||
| Food and beverage | 31,461 | 28,640 | 27,046 | 38,505 | 31,461 | 28,640 | ||||||||||||||||
| Advertising and marketing | 16,446 | 13,442 | 13,361 | 19,608 | 16,446 | 13,442 | ||||||||||||||||
| Administrative | 29,001 | 26,084 | 24,186 | 34,464 | 29,001 | 26,084 | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 26,131 | 24,503 | 24,844 | 26,913 | 26,131 | 24,503 | ||||||||||||||||
| Rent(Note 9) | 3,630 | 1,989 | 1,845 | 3,413 | 3,630 | 1,989 | ||||||||||||||||
| Property taxes | 10,395 | 8,145 | 7,944 | 9,473 | 10,395 | 8,145 | ||||||||||||||||
| Preopening expenses | 805 | 816 | 173 | 5,293 | 805 | 816 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other operating expenses | 20,784 | 16,355 | 16,997 | 23,936 | 20,784 | 16,355 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 249,704 | 228,156 | 226,243 | 286,492 | 249,704 | 228,156 | ||||||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME | 39,540 | 38,902 | 42,978 | 41,139 | 39,540 | 38,902 | ||||||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment income | 7,863 | 6,187 | 1,730 | 3,110 | 7,863 | 6,187 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (14,397 | ) | (14,874 | ) | (16,529 | ) | (13,921 | ) | (14,397 | ) | (14,874 | ) | ||||||||||
| Gain on disposition of property and equipment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| and investments in joint ventures | 1,749 | 2,195 | 2,778 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on disposition of property, equipment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| and other assets | 14,541 | 1,749 | 2,195 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Equity losses from unconsolidated joint ventures, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| net(Note 10) | (1,868 | ) | (1,090 | ) | (439 | ) | (1,366 | ) | (1,868 | ) | (1,090 | ) | ||||||||||
| (6,653 | ) | (7,582 | ) | (12,460 | ) | 2,364 | (6,653 | ) | (7,582 | ) | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 32,887 | 31,320 | 30,518 | 43,503 | 32,887 | 31,320 | ||||||||||||||||
| INCOME TAXES(Note 8) | 10,419 | 11,742 | 11,956 | 9,576 | 10,419 | 11,742 | ||||||||||||||||
| EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | 22,468 | 19,578 | 18,562 | 33,927 | 22,468 | 19,578 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
39
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (continued)
(in thousands, except per share data)
| Year ended | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | |||||||||
| DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS(Note 3): | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income | |||||||||||
| taxes (benefit) of $(960), $858 and $3,896 in 2006, | |||||||||||
| 2005 and 2004, respectively | $ | (1,905 | ) | $ | 1,322 | $ | 6,049 | ||||
| Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of income | |||||||||||
| taxes of $3,885 in 2006 and $50,856 in 2005 | 7,708 | 78,321 | -- | ||||||||
| EARNINGS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | 5,803 | 79,643 | 6,049 | ||||||||
| NET EARNINGS | $ | 28,271 | $ | 99,221 | $ | 24,611 | |||||
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC: | |||||||||||
| Continuing operations | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.63 | |||||
| Discontinued operations | 0.19 | 2.64 | 0.20 | ||||||||
| Net earnings per share | $ | 0.93 | $ | 3.29 | $ | 0.83 | |||||
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED: | |||||||||||
| Continuing operations | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.62 | |||||
| Discontinued operations | 0.18 | 2.61 | 0.20 | ||||||||
| Net earnings per share | $ | 0.91 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 0.82 | |||||
| Year ended | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||
| DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS(Note 3): | |||||||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income | |||||||||||
| taxes (benefit) of $(365), $(960) and $858 in 2007, | |||||||||||
| 2006 and 2005, respectively | $ | (515 | ) | $ | (1,905 | ) | $ | 1,322 | |||
| Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of | |||||||||||
| income taxes of $335, $3,885 and $50,856 in 2007, 2006 | |||||||||||
| and 2005, respectively | (115 | ) | 7,708 | 78,321 | |||||||
| EARNINGS (LOSSES) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | (630 | ) | 5,803 | 79,643 | |||||||
| NET EARNINGS | $ | 33,297 | $ | 28,271 | $ | 99,221 | |||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS- BASIC: | |||||||||||
| Common Stock | $ | 1.15 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.67 | |||||
| Class B Common Stock | 1.04 | 0.68 | 0.60 | ||||||||
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - BASIC: | |||||||||||
| Common Stock | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.20 | $ | 2.75 | ||||
| Class B Common Stock | (0.02 | ) | 0.18 | 2.42 | |||||||
NET EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC: | |||||||||||
| Common Stock | $ | 1.13 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 3.42 | |||||
| Class B Common Stock | 1.02 | 0.86 | 3.02 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS- DILUTED: | |||||||||||
| Common Stock | $ | 1.10 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.64 | |||||
| Class B Common Stock | 1.03 | 0.67 | 0.59 | ||||||||
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - DILUTED: | |||||||||||
| Common Stock | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.18 | $ | 2.61 | ||||
| Class B Common Stock | (0.02 | ) | 0.18 | 2.40 | |||||||
NET EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED: | |||||||||||
| Common Stock | $ | 1.08 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 3.25 | |||||
| Class B Common Stock | 1.01 | 0.85 | 2.99 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
40
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except per share data)
| Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Capital in Excess of Par | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Unearned Compensation on Restricted Stock | Treasury Stock | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALANCES AT MAY 29, 2003 | $ | 21,684 | $ | 9,506 | $ | 41,751 | $ | 314,903 | $ | (2,181 | ) | $ | -- | $ | (15,763 | ) | $ | 369,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $.20 per share Class B Common Stock | -- | -- | -- | (1,875 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (1,875 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $.22 per share Common Stock | -- | -- | -- | (4,468 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (4,468 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of stock options | -- | -- | 537 | -- | -- | -- | 2,597 | 3,134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of treasury stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (512 | ) | (512 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Savings and profit-sharing contribution | -- | -- | 302 | -- | -- | -- | 390 | 692 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reissuance of treasury stock | -- | -- | 99 | -- | -- | -- | 149 | 248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted stock | -- | -- | 263 | -- | -- | (731 | ) | 468 | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of unearned compensation on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| restricted stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 101 | -- | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversions of Class B Common Stock | 182 | (182 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Components of comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | -- | -- | -- | 24,611 | -- | -- | -- | 24,611 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain on available for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| sale investments, net of tax effect of $101 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 151 | -- | -- | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of loss on swap agreement, net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of tax effect of $269(Note 5) | -- | -- | -- | -- | 402 | -- | -- | 402 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum pension liability, net of tax effect | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of $880 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1,339 | -- | -- | 1,339 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | 26,503 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Capital In Excess of Par | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Unearned Compensation on Non-vested Stock | Treasury Stock | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BALANCES AT MAY 27, 2004 | 21,866 | 9,324 | 42,952 | 333,171 | (289 | ) | (630 | ) | (12,671 | ) | 393,723 | $ | 21,866 | $ | 9,324 | $ | 42,952 | $ | 333,171 | $ | (289 | ) | $ | (630 | ) | $ | (12,671 | ) | $ | 393,723 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $.20 per share Class B Common Stock | -- | -- | -- | (1,831 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (1,831 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (1,831 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (1,831 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $.22 per share Common Stock | -- | -- | -- | (4,620 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (4,620 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (4,620 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (4,620 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of stock options | -- | -- | 1,885 | -- | -- | -- | 4,845 | 6,730 | -- | -- | 1,885 | -- | -- | -- | 4,845 | 6,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of treasury stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (518 | ) | (518 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (518 | ) | (518 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Savings and profit-sharing contribution | -- | -- | 338 | -- | -- | -- | 221 | 559 | -- | -- | 338 | -- | -- | -- | 221 | 559 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reissuance of treasury stock | -- | -- | 134 | -- | -- | -- | 113 | 247 | -- | -- | 134 | -- | -- | -- | 113 | 247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted stock | -- | -- | 98 | -- | -- | -- | 75 | 173 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of non-vested stock | -- | -- | 98 | -- | -- | -- | 75 | 173 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of unearned compensation on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| restricted stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 107 | -- | 107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cancellation of restricted stock | -- | -- | (39 | ) | -- | -- | 110 | (71 | ) | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| non-vested stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 107 | -- | 107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cancellation of non-vested stock | -- | -- | (39 | ) | -- | -- | 110 | (71 | ) | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration of stock option vesting period | -- | -- | 113 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 113 | -- | -- | 113 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 113 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversions of Class B Common Stock | 233 | (233 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 233 | (233 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Components of comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | -- | -- | -- | 99,221 | -- | -- | -- | 99,221 | -- | -- | -- | 99,221 | -- | -- | -- | 99,221 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain on available for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| sale investments, net of tax effect of $80 | -- | -- | -- | -- | (121 | ) | -- | -- | (121 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | (121 | ) | -- | -- | (121 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of loss on swap agreement, net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of tax effect of $173(Note 5) | -- | -- | -- | -- | 259 | -- | -- | 259 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 259 | -- | -- | 259 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum pension liability, net of tax | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| benefit of $250 | -- | -- | -- | -- | (381 | ) | -- | -- | (381 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | (381 | ) | -- | -- | (381 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | 98,978 | 98,978 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BALANCES AT MAY 26, 2005 | 22,099 | 9,091 | 45,481 | 425,941 | (532 | ) | (413 | ) | (8,006 | ) | 493,661 | 22,099 | 9,091 | 45,481 | 425,941 | (532 | ) | (413 | ) | (8,006 | ) | 493,661 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $.24 per share Class B Common Stock | -- | -- | -- | (2,137 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (2,137 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (2,137 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (2,137 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $.26 per share Common Stock | -- | -- | -- | (5,592 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (5,592 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (5,592 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (5,592 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $7.00 per share Class B and Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| special dividend | -- | -- | -- | (214,576 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (214,576 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (214,576 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (214,576 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of stock options | -- | -- | (19 | ) | -- | -- | -- | 6,507 | 6,488 | -- | -- | (19 | ) | -- | -- | -- | 6,507 | 6,488 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of treasury stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (6,492 | ) | (6,492 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (6,492 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Savings and profit-sharing contribution | -- | -- | 224 | -- | -- | -- | 292 | 516 | -- | -- | 224 | -- | -- | -- | 292 | 516 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reissuance of treasury stock | -- | -- | 127 | -- | -- | -- | 120 | 247 | -- | -- | 127 | -- | -- | -- | 120 | 247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of restricted stock | -- | -- | 98 | -- | -- | -- | 75 | 173 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of non-vested stock | -- | -- | 98 | -- | -- | -- | 75 | 173 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of unearned compensation on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| restricted stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 120 | -- | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| non-vested stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 120 | -- | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversions of Class B Common Stock | 137 | (137 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 137 | (137 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Components of comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | -- | -- | -- | 28,271 | -- | -- | -- | 28,271 | -- | -- | -- | 28,271 | -- | -- | -- | 28,271 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain on available for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| sale investments, net of tax effect of $63 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 93 | -- | -- | 93 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 93 | -- | -- | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of loss on swap agreement, net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of tax effect of $73(Note 5) | -- | -- | -- | -- | 111 | -- | -- | 111 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 111 | -- | -- | 111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum pension liability, net of tax effect | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of $288 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 440 | -- | -- | 440 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 440 | -- | -- | 440 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | 28,915 | 28,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BALANCES AT MAY 25, 2006 | $ | 22,236 | $ | 8,954 | $ | 45,911 | $ | 231,907 | $ | 112 | $ | (293 | ) | $ | (7,504 | ) | $ | 301,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BALANCES AT MAY 26, 2006 | 22,236 | 8,954 | 45,911 | 231,907 | 112 | (293 | ) | (7,504 | ) | 301,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $.29 per share Class B Common Stock | -- | -- | -- | (2,599 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (2,599 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $.32 per share Common Stock | -- | -- | -- | (6,878 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (6,878 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercise of stock options | -- | -- | (671 | ) | -- | -- | -- | 2,735 | 2,064 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of treasury stock | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (8,117 | ) | (8,117 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Savings and profit-sharing contribution | -- | -- | 176 | -- | -- | -- | 273 | 449 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reissuance of treasury stock | -- | -- | 112 | -- | -- | -- | 159 | 271 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of non-vested stock | -- | -- | (123 | ) | -- | -- | -- | 123 | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | -- | -- | 1,326 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1,326 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassification of unearned compensation on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| non-vested stock | -- | -- | (293 | ) | -- | -- | 293 | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversions of Class B Common Stock | 64 | (64 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Components of comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | -- | -- | -- | 33,297 | -- | -- | -- | 33,297 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gain on available for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| sale investments, net of tax effect of $78 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 117 | -- | -- | 117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum pension liability, net of tax effect | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of $7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 11 | -- | -- | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | 33,425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| net of taxes of $1,170 | -- | -- | -- | -- | (1,755 | ) | -- | -- | (1,755 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BALANCES AT MAY 31, 2007 | $ | 22,300 | $ | 8,890 | $ | 46,438 | $ | 255,727 | $ | (1,515 | ) | $ | -- | $ | (12,331 | ) | $ | 319,509 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
41
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
| Year ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 28,271 | $ | 99,221 | $ | 24,611 | $ | 33,297 | $ | 28,271 | $ | 99,221 | ||||||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| in) operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Losses on loans to and investments in joint ventures | 1,974 | 1,566 | 755 | 1,770 | 1,974 | 1,566 | ||||||||||||||||
| Gain on disposition of property, equipment and investments in | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| joint ventures | (1,749 | ) | (2,113 | ) | (2,174 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Gain on disposition of property, equipment and other assets | (8,868 | ) | (1,749 | ) | (2,113 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of condominium units | (5,893 | ) | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale of limited-service lodging division | (11,728 | ) | (123,283 | ) | -- | -- | (11,728 | ) | (123,283 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Loss (gain) on sale of Miramonte Resort | 135 | (5,894 | ) | -- | -- | 135 | (5,894 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Impairment of property and equipment | 501 | -- | -- | -- | 501 | -- | ||||||||||||||||
| Distributions from joint ventures | 373 | 6,638 | 296 | 184 | 373 | 6,638 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of loss on swap agreement | 184 | 432 | 671 | -- | 184 | 432 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of unearned compensation on restricted stock | 120 | 107 | 101 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of favorable lease right | 676 | -- | -- | (9 | ) | 676 | -- | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 26,274 | 28,402 | 46,036 | 26,925 | 26,274 | 28,402 | ||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation expense | 1,326 | 120 | 107 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (3,598 | ) | (15,159 | ) | 1,252 | 7,405 | (3,598 | ) | (15,159 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Deferred compensation and other | 240 | 663 | 1,423 | 2,007 | 240 | 663 | ||||||||||||||||
| Contribution of the Company's stock to savings and | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| profit-sharing plan | 516 | 559 | 692 | 449 | 516 | 559 | ||||||||||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounts and notes receivable | (4,431 | ) | 1,555 | 13,756 | (445 | ) | (4,431 | ) | 1,555 | |||||||||||||
| Real estate and development costs | 1,541 | 1,453 | (1,100 | ) | 3,173 | 1,541 | 1,453 | |||||||||||||||
| Condominium units held for sale | (692 | ) | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other current assets | (6,343 | ) | 707 | (557 | ) | 7,794 | (6,343 | ) | 707 | |||||||||||||
| Accounts payable | 4,395 | (1,324 | ) | (3,207 | ) | 4,711 | 4,395 | (1,324 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Income taxes | 194 | (4,092 | ) | 4,344 | (3,643 | ) | 194 | (4,092 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes other than income taxes | 2,375 | (1,254 | ) | 35 | 415 | 2,375 | (1,254 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Accrued compensation | 647 | (1,996 | ) | 1,517 | (724 | ) | 647 | (1,996 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Other accrued liabilities | (993 | ) | 820 | 3,796 | (4,326 | ) | (993 | ) | 820 | |||||||||||||
| Total adjustments | 11,303 | (112,213 | ) | 67,636 | 31,559 | 11,303 | (112,213 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 39,574 | (12,992 | ) | 92,247 | 64,856 | 39,574 | (12,992 | ) | ||||||||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | (35,702 | ) | (63,431 | ) | (50,915 | ) | (111,102 | ) | (35,702 | ) | (63,431 | ) | ||||||||||
| Purchase of theatres, net of cash acquired | (75,650 | ) | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of hotels, net of cash acquired | (39,830 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (39,830 | ) | -- | ||||||||||||||
| Net proceeds from disposals of property, equipment and other assets | 6,902 | 4,154 | 8,751 | 32,194 | 6,902 | 4,154 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net proceeds from sale of condominium units | 95,695 | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net proceeds from sale of limited-service lodging division | 24,979 | 365,447 | -- | -- | 24,979 | 365,447 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net proceeds from sale of Miramonte Resort | -- | 28,503 | -- | -- | -- | 28,503 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net proceeds received from (held by) intermediaries | 26,800 | (28,552 | ) | -- | (3,997 | ) | 26,800 | (28,552 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Contributions received from Oklahoma City | 7,372 | -- | -- | 3,972 | 7,372 | -- | ||||||||||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in other assets | (8,608 | ) | 446 | 798 | (1,996 | ) | (8,608 | ) | 446 | |||||||||||||
| Purchase of interest in joint ventures | (1,685 | ) | (4,276 | ) | (4,500 | ) | (11,057 | ) | (1,685 | ) | (4,276 | ) | ||||||||||
| Payment on joint venture debt guarantee | -- | -- | (930 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cash received from (advanced to) joint ventures | (684 | ) | 145 | 102 | (344 | ) | (684 | ) | 145 | |||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (20,456 | ) | 302,436 | (46,694 | ) | (72,285 | ) | (20,456 | ) | 302,436 | ||||||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt transactions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net proceeds from issuance of notes payable and long-term debt | 5,558 | 13,550 | 10,840 | 111,448 | 5,558 | 13,550 | ||||||||||||||||
| Principal payments on notes payable and long-term debt | (27,317 | ) | (53,746 | ) | (49,330 | ) | (111,270 | ) | (27,317 | ) | (53,746 | ) | ||||||||||
| Equity transactions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury stock transactions, except for stock options | (6,072 | ) | (98 | ) | (264 | ) | (7,846 | ) | (6,072 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||||||||
| Exercise of stock options | 6,488 | 6,730 | 3,134 | 2,064 | 6,488 | 6,730 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid | (222,305 | ) | (6,451 | ) | (6,343 | ) | (9,477 | ) | (222,305 | ) | (6,451 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (243,648 | ) | (40,015 | ) | (41,963 | ) | (15,081 | ) | (243,648 | ) | (40,015 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (224,530 | ) | 249,429 | 3,590 | (22,510 | ) | (224,530 | ) | 249,429 | |||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 259,058 | 9,629 | 6,039 | 34,528 | 259,058 | 9,629 | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 34,528 | $ | 259,058 | * | $ | 9,629 | ** | $ | 12,018 | $ | 34,528 | $ | 259,058 | * | |||||||
*Includes $1 of cash included in assets of discontinued operations**Includes $190 of cash included in assets of discontinued operations
See accompanying notes.
42
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
Description of Business – The Marcus Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) operate principally in two business segments:
| Theatres: Operates multiscreen motion picture theatres in Wisconsin, Illinois, Ohio, Iowa, Minnesota and |
| Hotels and Resorts: Owns and operates full service hotels and resorts in Wisconsin, |
Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Marcus Corporation and all of its subsidiaries. Investments in affiliates which are 50% or less owned by the Company for which the Company exercises significant influence or for which the affiliate maintains separate equity accounts are accounted for on the equity method. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fiscal Year – The Company reports on a 52/53-week year ending the last Thursday of May. All segments hadFiscal 2007 was a 52-week53-week year inand fiscal 2006 and 2005 and 2004.were 52-week years.
Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Financial Instruments – The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments (including cash and cash equivalents, cash held by intermediaries, accounts receivable, notes receivable, investments and accounts and notes payable) approximates fair value. The fair value of the Company’s $148,127,000$119,998,000 of senior notes is approximately $151,535,000$122,374,000 at May 25, 2006,31, 2007, determined based upon current market interest rates for financial instruments with a similar average remaining life. The carrying amounts of the Company’s remaining long-term debt approximate their fair values.
Accounts and Notes Receivable – The Company evaluates the collectibility of its accounts and notes receivable based on a number of factors. For larger accounts, an allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on the applicable parties’ ability and likelihood to pay based on management’s review of the facts. For all other accounts, the Company recognizes an allowance based on length of time the receivable is past due based on historical experience and industry practice.
43
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Long-Lived Assets – The Company periodically considers whether indicators of impairment of long-lived assets held for use are present. If such indicators are present, the Company determines whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to such assets is less than their carrying amounts. The Company recognizes any impairment losses based on the excess of the carrying amount of the assets over their fair value. For the purpose of determining fair value, defined as the amount at which an asset or group of assets could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, the Company utilizes currently available market valuations of similar assets in its respective industries, often expressed as a given multiple of operating cash flow. The Company evaluated the ongoing value of its property and equipment and other long-lived assets as of May 31, 2007, May 25, 2006, and May 26, 2005, and May 27, 2004, and determined that there was no significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, other than a $501,000 before-tax impairment charge recorded in fiscal 2006 related to theatres scheduled to close during fiscal 2007. The impairment charge is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings.closed theatres.
Goodwill – The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if certain indicators arise. The Company performed an annual impairment test as of the Company’s year-end date in fiscal 2007, 2006 2005 and 20042005 and deemed that no impairment loss was necessary.indicated. The Company’s goodwill relates to its Theatres segment and represents the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of the assets acquired.
Capitalization of Interest – The Company capitalizes interest during construction periods by adding such interest to the cost of property and equipment.constructed assets. Interest of approximately $835,000$856,000 and $296,000$835,000 was capitalized in fiscal 20052007 and 2004,2005, respectively. There was no interest capitalized in fiscal 2006.
Investments – Available for sale securities are stated at fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of shareholders’ equity. The cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in investment income. The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a periodic basis and principally considers the type of security, the severity of the decline in fair value, and the duration of the decline in fair value in determining whether a security’s decline in fair value is other-than-temporary.
Revenue Recognition – The Company recognizes revenue from its rooms as earned on the close of business each day. Revenues from theatre admissions, concessions and food and beverage sales are recognized at the time of sale. Revenues from advanced ticket and gift certificate sales are recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized when tickets or gift certificates are used.redeemed. Other revenues include management fees for theatres and hotels under management agreements. The management fees are recognized as earned based on the terms of the agreements and include both base fees and incentive fees. Revenues do not include sales tax as the Company considers itself a pass-through conduit for collecting and remitting sales taxes.
44
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Revenues from discontinued operations include, in part, sales from a vacation ownership development. Sale of vacation intervals arewere recognized on an accrual basis after a binding sales contract hashad been executed, a 10% minimum down payment is received, the rescission period has expired, construction iswas substantially complete, and certain minimum sales levels havehad been reached. Development costs, including construction costs, interest and other carrying costs, which arewere allocated based on relative sales values, are included in assets of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Advertising and Marketing Costs – The Company generally expenses all advertising and marketing costs as incurred.
Depreciation and Amortization – Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are provided using the straight-line method over the shorter of the following estimated useful lives or any related lease terms:
| Years | ||
Land improvements | 15 - 39 | |
| Buildings and improvements | 25 - 39 | |
| Leasehold improvements | 3 - 40 | |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 3 - 20 |
Preopening Expenses – Costs incurred prior to opening new or remodeled facilities are expensed as incurred.
EarningsEarning Per Share (EPS) – Basic EPSNet earnings per share (EPS) of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock is computed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128,Earnings per Share (SFAS No. 128) using the two-class method. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 128, basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding.outstanding less any non-vested stock. Diluted net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for the effect of dilutive stock options and non-vested restricted stock using the treasury stock method. Convertible Class B Common Stock is reflected on an if-converted basis. The computation of the diluted net earnings per share of Common Stock assumes the conversion of Class B Common Stock, while the diluted net earnings per share of Class B Common Stock does not assume the conversion of those shares.
Holders of Common Stock are entitled to cash dividends per share equal to 110% of all dividends declared and paid on each share of the Class B Common Stock. As such, and in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 03-06,Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128(EITF 03-06), the undistributed earnings for each year are allocated based on the proportionate share of entitled cash dividends. Basic earnings per share for fiscal 2006 and 2005 have been presented in accordance with EITF 03-06 for comparative purposes. The computation of diluted net earnings per share of Common Stock assumes the conversion of Class B Common Stock and, as such, the undistributed earnings are equal to net earnings for that computation.
45
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
The following table illustrates the computation of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock basic and diluted earnings per share for earnings from continuing operations and provides a reconciliation of the number of weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding:
| Year ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data) | (in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Numerator: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 22,468 | $ | 19,578 | $ | 18,562 | $ | 33,927 | $ | 22,468 | $ | 19,578 | ||||||||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Denominator for basic EPS | 30,439 | 30,120 | 29,630 | 30,359 | 30,439 | 30,120 | ||||||||||||||||
| Effect of dilutive employee stock options and non-vested | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| restricted stock | 500 | 406 | 220 | 448 | 500 | 406 | ||||||||||||||||
| Denominator for diluted EPS | 30,939 | 30,526 | 29,850 | 30,807 | 30,939 | 30,526 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share from continuing operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.63 | ||||||||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.62 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share from continuing operations - Basic: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | $ | 1.15 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||||||||||||
| Class B Common Stock | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.60 | ||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per share from continuing operations - Diluted: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | $ | 1.10 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||||||||||
| Class B Common Stock | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||||||||||
Options to purchase 5,500 shares, 7,778 shares, 6,416 shares and 400,2216,416 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $22.89 to $23.37, $16.24 to $17.73, and $15.70 to $16.24 and $11.27 to $12.72 per share were outstanding at May 31, 2007, May 25, 2006, and May 26, 2005, and May 27, 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares, and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) – Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the following, all presented net of tax:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Unrealized gain on available for sale investments | $ | 123 | $ | 30 | ||||
| Unrecognized loss on interest rate swap agreement | -- | (111 | ) | |||||
| Minimum pension liability | (11 | ) | (451 | ) | ||||
| $ | 112 | $ | (532 | ) | ||||
Stock-Based Compensation – The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25), in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB No. 25, because the number of shares is fixed and the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
Pro forma information regarding net earnings and earnings per share required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rates of 4.2%, 3.5% and 3.3% for
46
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively; a dividend yield of 1.1%, 1.2% and 1.5% for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively; volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company’s Common Stock of 39% for fiscal 2006, 43% for fiscal 2005 and 45% for fiscal 2004; and an expected life of the option of approximately five years in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. Had compensation cost been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards under the plans based on the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s pro forma earnings and earnings per share would have been as follows:
| Year ended | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | |||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||
Net earnings, as reported | $ | 28,271 | $ | 99,221 | $ | 24,611 | |||||
| Deduct: incremental stock-based employee compensation | |||||||||||
| expense determined under the fair value method for all | |||||||||||
| option awards, net of related tax effects | (782 | ) | (949 | ) | (1,071 | ) | |||||
| Pro forma net earnings | $ | 27,489 | $ | 98,272 | $ | 23,540 | |||||
Earnings per share: | |||||||||||
| Basic - as reported | $ | 0.93 | $ | 3.29 | $ | 0.83 | |||||
| Basic - pro forma | $ | 0.90 | $ | 3.26 | $ | 0.79 | |||||
Diluted - as reported | $ | 0.91 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 0.82 | |||||
| Diluted - pro forma | $ | 0.89 | $ | 3.23 | $ | 0.79 | |||||
| May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
Unrealized gain on available for sale investments | $ | 240 | $ | 123 | ||||
| Minimum pension liability | -- | (11 | ) | |||||
| Net actuarial loss | (1,755 | ) | -- | |||||
| $ | (1,515 | ) | $ | 112 | ||||
New Accounting Pronouncements – In December 2004,June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123(R),Shared-Based Payment, which changed the accounting rules relating to equity compensation programs. Effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, companies that award share-based payments to employees, including stock options, must begin to recognize the expense of these awards in the financial statements at the time the employee receives the award based on a fair value measurement method. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, the Company has elected to follow APB No. 25 (which uses an intrinsic value measurement method) in accounting for its employee stock options until the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R).
Under APB No. 25’s intrinsic value method, no compensation cost for the Company’s employee stock options is recognized. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)’s fair value method will have an impact on the Company’s results of operations in fiscal 2007, although it will not have an impact on the Company’s overall financial position. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, it is believed that had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net earnings and earnings per share in the discussion of “Stock-Based Compensation” above.
47
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which establishes retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition requirements specific to the newly adopted accounting principle. The statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
In December 2004, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position 04-2,Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions (the SOP) and the FASB amended SFAS No. 66,Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, and SFAS No. 67,Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, to exclude accounting for real estate time-sharing transactions from these statements. The SOP is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The impact of the SOP on the Company’s required reserves on its remaining notes receivable for interval ownership is currently being evaluated.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement criteria for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The new standard will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The impactBased upon the Company’s initial review, the Company does not believe adoption of FIN 48 will have a material impact on the Company’s overall financial results is currently being evaluated.position.
Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation.46
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
On May 30, 2005,April 19, 2007, the Company purchased the Wyndham Milwaukee Center hotel, consisting primarily of land, building and fixtures,acquired 11 owned and/or leased movie theatres for a total purchase price of $23,580,000,$75,650,000, net of cash acquired. The resultsacquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of operationaccounting. The net assets acquired consist primarily of land, buildings, leasehold improvements and equipment. The difference between the Wyndham Milwaukee Center hotel are included in the consolidated statement of earnings since the acquisition date. The fair value of the net assets acquired approximates the purchase price. The consolidated financial statements reflect the allocation ofand the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their respective fair values.
On May 2, 2006, the Company purchased the Westin Columbus hotel, consisting primarilywas recorded as goodwill of land, building and fixtures,$26,609,000, which is deductible for a total purchase price of $16,250,000, net of cash acquired. The results of operation of the Westin Columbus hotel are included in the consolidated statement of earnings since the acquisition date. The fair value of the net assets acquired approximates the purchase price.tax purposes over fifteen years. The consolidated financial statements reflect the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values.
The effects From the date of presentingacquisition, the acquisitions on an unaudited pro forma basis were not significantacquired theatres contributed approximately $3,500,000 and $650,000 to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
48
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMETNS
May 25, 2006revenues and operating income, respectively, in fiscal 2007.
On September 3, 2004, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of its limited-service lodging division for a total purchase price of $414,900,000 in cash. The purchase price includes approximately $19,000,000 of proceeds related to the sale of four joint venture properties in the transaction. Net proceeds related to the Company to-date from the sale arewere $390,426,000, net of transaction costs and include $24,979,000 in proceeds received during fiscal 2006 related to funds held in escrow pending completion of certain customary transfer requirements. Net proceeds exclude $10,297,000 of proceeds related to the sale of a joint venture property sold in a subsequent transaction.
The assets sold to-date consisted primarily of land, buildings and equipment with a net book value of approximately $254,792,000, including goodwill with a net book value of approximately $551,000. The result of the transaction to-date iswas a gain on sale of $82,545,000, net of income taxes of $52,466,000, including additional after tax gains of $7,798,000 recognized during fiscal 2006. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144), the results of operations of the limited-service lodging division have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of earnings for all periods presented. Limited-service lodging revenues for the years ended May 31, 2007, May 25, 2006 and May 26, 2005 were $102,000, $523,000 and May 27, 2004 were $629,000, $43,456,000, and $128,127,000, respectively. Operating income (loss) for the years ended May 31, 2007, May 25, 2006 and May 26, 2005 was $(166,000), $(1,679,000) and May 27, 2004 was $(1,573,000), $5,719,000, and $14,289,000, respectively.
The Company incurred approximately $1,800,000 in one-time severance related costs during fiscal 2005, of which approximately $1,600,000 of these costs were paid out during fiscal 2005. The remaining costs were paid out during fiscal 2006. These one-time termination benefits are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of earnings.
On December 1, 2004, the Company sold the Miramonte Resort for a total purchase price of approximately $28,700,000 in cash. Net proceeds to the Company from the sale were approximately $28,503,000, net of transaction costs, all of which was being held by intermediaries at May 26, 2005 to facilitate potential tax deferral opportunities.costs. The assets sold to-date consisted primarily of land, building and equipment with a net book value of approximately $22,744,000. The result of the transaction to-date is a gain on sale of $3,484,000, which is net of income taxes of $2,275,000. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the results of operations of the Miramonte, which have historically been included in the Hotels and Resorts segment financial results, have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of earnings for all periods presented. Miramonte revenues for the yearsyear ended May 26, 2005 and May 27, 2004 were $3,433,000 and $6,495,000, respectively.$3,433,000. Miramonte’s operating loss for the years ended May 31, 2007, May 25, 2006 and May 26, 2005 was $25,000, $95,000 and $2,193,000, respectively.
47
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 27, 2004 was $95,000, $2,193,000 and $2,843,000, respectively.31, 2007
On June 29, 2006, during the Company’s fiscal 2007 first quarter, the Company sold the remaining timeshare inventory of its Marcus Vacation Club at Grand Geneva vacation ownership development. The assets sold consisted primarily of real estate and development costs. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the results of operations of the Marcus Vacation Club, which have historically been included in the Hotels and Resorts segment financial results, have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of earnings for all periods presented. Marcus Vacation Club revenues for the years ended May 31, 2007, May 25, 2006 and May 26, 2005 were $3,958,000, $4,835,000 and May 27, 2004 were $4,835,000, $5,649,000, and $5,710,000, respectively. Marcus Vacation Club’s operating loss for the years ended May 31, 2007, May 25, 2006 and May 26, 2005 was $33,000, $1,085,000 and May 27, 2004 was $1,085,000, $560,000, and $158,000, respectively.
49The consolidated statements of cash flows include the cash flows from discontinued operations, effectively $0 for both fiscal 2007 and 2006 and $1,000 for fiscal 2005.
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
The components of the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations included in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | -- | $ | 1 | ||||
| Refundable income taxes | 2,812 | 2,424 | ||||||
| Real estate and development costs | 3,444 | 4,985 | ||||||
| Other current assets | 144 | 444 | ||||||
| Net property and equipment | 1,101 | 14,869 | ||||||
| Other assets | 44 | 137 | ||||||
| Assets of discontinued operations | $ | 7,545 | $ | 22,860 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | 343 | $ | 3,878 | ||||
| Deferred income taxes | 172 | 4,319 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | 1,483 | 1,336 | ||||||
| Liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 1,998 | $ | 9,533 | ||||
The consolidated statements of cash flows include results of operations from both continuing operations and discontinued operations.
| May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||
| Refundable income taxes | $ | 733 | $ | 2,812 | ||||
| Real estate and development costs | 24 | 3,444 | ||||||
| Other current assets | 203 | 144 | ||||||
| Net property and equipment | -- | 1,101 | ||||||
| Other assets | 15 | 44 | ||||||
| Assets of discontinued operations | $ | 975 | $ | 7,545 | ||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | 463 | $ | 343 | ||||
| Deferred income taxes | 222 | 172 | ||||||
| Other liabilities | 2,046 | 1,483 | ||||||
| Liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 2,731 | $ | 1,998 | ||||
The composition of accounts and notes receivable is as follows:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Trade receivables, net of allowance of $453 and $156, respectively | $ | 4,715 | $ | 4,079 | ||||||||||||
Trade receivables, net of allowance of $138 and $453, respectively | $ | 6,866 | $ | 4,715 | ||||||||||||
| Current notes receivable for interval ownership | 1,406 | 1,352 | 1,174 | 1,406 | ||||||||||||
| Other receivables | 8,185 | 3,480 | 8,184 | 8,185 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 14,306 | $ | 8,911 | $ | 16,224 | $ | 14,306 | |||||||||
48
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
The composition of property and equipment, which is stated at cost, is as follows:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
Land and improvements | $ | 60,889 | $ | 50,595 | ||||
| Buildings and improvements | 382,555 | 343,375 | ||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 39,682 | 9,138 | ||||||
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 167,687 | 160,488 | ||||||
| Construction in progress | 17,580 | 36,820 | ||||||
| 668,393 | 600,416 | |||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 217,864 | 201,668 | ||||||
| $ | 450,529 | $ | 398,748 | |||||
50
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
| May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Land and improvements | $ | 68,732 | $ | 60,889 | ||||
| Buildings and improvements | 464,928 | 382,555 | ||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 57,309 | 39,682 | ||||||
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 197,593 | 167,687 | ||||||
| Construction in progress | 3,995 | 17,580 | ||||||
| 792,557 | 668,393 | |||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 232,772 | 217,864 | ||||||
| $ | 559,785 | $ | 450,529 | |||||
The composition of other assets is as follows:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Favorable lease right | $ | 12,677 | $ | 13,353 | $ | 12,686 | $ | 12,677 | ||||||||
| Long-term notes receivable for interval ownership, net | 4,540 | 5,295 | 2,930 | 4,540 | ||||||||||||
| Split dollar life insurance policies | 9,319 | 4,870 | 10,299 | 9,319 | ||||||||||||
| Deposit on land purchase | -- | 5,662 | ||||||||||||||
| Other assets | 12,583 | 8,442 | 13,657 | 12,583 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 39,119 | $ | 37,622 | $ | 39,572 | $ | 39,119 | |||||||||
The Company’s long-term notes receivable for interval ownership are net of a reserve for uncollectible amounts of $1,206,000$945,000 and $1,182,000$1,206,000 as of May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, respectively. The notes bear fixed-rate interest between 11.90%6.0% and 15.90% over the seven-year or ten-year terms of the loans. The weighted-average rate of interest on outstanding notes receivable for interval ownership is 15.25%15.30%. The notes are collateralized by the underlying vacation intervals.
The Company has escrow deposits of $6,895,000$722,000 and $864,000,$6,895,000, which are included in other current assets as of May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, respectively. The Company also has deferred revenue of $7,752,000$9,654,000 and $6,080,000,$7,752,000, which is included in other accrued liabilities as of May 31, 2007 and May 25, 2006, and respectively.
49
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 26, 2005, respectively.31, 2007
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands, except payment data) | (in thousands, except payment data) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage notes | $ | 25,139 | $ | 22,043 | $ | 61,090 | $ | 25,139 | ||||||||
| Senior notes due May 31, 2005, bearing interest at 10.22% | -- | 359 | ||||||||||||||
| Senior notes | 148,127 | 172,685 | 119,998 | 148,127 | ||||||||||||
| Unsecured term note due February 2025, with monthly principal | ||||||||||||||||
| and interest payments of $39,110, bearing interest at 8.22% | 3,246 | 1,566 | ||||||||||||||
| Unsecured term note due February 2025, with monthly principal and | ||||||||||||||||
| interest payments of $39,110, bearing interest at 5.75% | 5,228 | 3,246 | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial paper | 46,359 | -- | ||||||||||||||
| Revolving credit agreement | 24,000 | -- | ||||||||||||||
| 176,512 | 196,653 | 256,675 | 176,512 | |||||||||||||
| Less current maturities | 53,402 | 25,765 | 57,250 | 53,402 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 123,110 | $ | 170,888 | $ | 199,425 | $ | 123,110 | |||||||||
The mortgage notes, both fixed rate and adjustable, bear interest from 6.50%1.0% to 7.33%7.32% at May 25, 2006,31, 2007, and mature in fiscal years 20072008 through 2010. During fiscal 2007, it is the Company’s intention to extend the maturity date of a mortgage note in the amount of $25,030,000 with a current maturity date of September 2006.2036. The mortgage notes are secured by the related land, buildings and equipment.
51
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
The $148,127,000$119,998,000 of senior notes maturing in 2009 through 2014 require annual principal payments in varying installments and bear interest payable semiannually at fixed rates ranging from 6.66% to 7.93%, with a weighted-average fixed rate of 7.25%7.21% at May 25, 2006.31, 2007.
The Company has the ability to issueissues commercial paper through an agreement with two banks, up to a maximum of $65,000,000.$65,000,000, which bears interest at 5.45% at May 31, 2007. The agreements require the Company to maintain unused bank lines of credit at least equal to the principal amount of outstanding commercial paper.
At May 25, 2006,31, 2007, the Company had a credit line totaling $125,000,000 in place. NoThere were borrowings areof $24,000,000 outstanding on the $125,000,000 line, which bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin which adjusts based on the Company’s borrowing levels.levels, effectively 6.175% at May 31, 2007. This agreement matures in April 2009 and requires an annual facility fee of 0.175% on the total commitment. Based on noborrowings and commercial paper outstanding, availability under the line at May 25, 200631, 2007 totaled $125,000,000.$54,641,000.
The Company has the ability and the intent to replace commercial paper borrowings with long-term borrowings under its credit facility. Accordingly, the Company has classified these borrowings at May 31, 2007 as long-term.
The Company’s loan agreements include, among other covenants, maintenance of certain financial ratios.
50
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
Scheduled annual principal payments on long-term debt for the years subsequent to May 25, 200631, 2007 are:
| Fiscal Year | Fiscal Year | (in thousands) | Fiscal Year | (in thousands) | ||||||
| 2007 | $ | 53,402 | ||||||||
| 2008 | 31,964 | $ | 57,250 | |||||||
| 2009 | 31,986 | 102,138 | ||||||||
| 2010 | 14,506 | 14,282 | ||||||||
| 2011 | 14,526 | 14,283 | ||||||||
| 2012 | 14,287 | |||||||||
| Thereafter | 30,128 | 54,435 | ||||||||
| $ | 176,512 | $ | 256,675 | |||||||
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized, in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 totaled $13,581,000, $14,245,000 and 2004 totaled $14,245,000, $14,682,000, and $16,398,000, respectively.
The Company has utilized derivatives in the past principally to manage market risks and reduce its exposure resulting from fluctuations in interest rates. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions. From June 1, 2001 to May 3, 2002, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement that was considered effective and qualified as a cash flow hedge. On May 3, 2002, the Company terminated the swap, at which time cash flow hedge accounting ceased. The fair value of the swap on the date of termination was a liability of $2,791,000. In fiscal 2006 2005 and 2004,2005, the Company reclassified $184,000 ($111,000 net of tax), and $432,000 ($259,000 net of tax) and $671,000 ($402,000 net of tax), respectively, from other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense.
52
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
Shareholders may convert their shares of Class B Common Stock into shares of Common Stock at any time. Class B Common Stock shareholders are substantially restricted in their ability to transfer their Class B Common Stock. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to cash dividends per share equal to 110% of all dividends declared and paid on each share of the Class B Common Stock. Holders of Class B Common Stock are entitled to ten votes per share while holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on any matters brought before the shareholders of the Company. Liquidation rights are the same for both classes of stock.
During both fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, the Company granted 8,000 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $172,800 each year. These shares were issued in connection with the sale of the limited-service lodging division, and therefore, the related compensation expense is included in discontinued operations in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2004, the Company granted 50,000 shares of restricted stock. Pursuant to the sale of the limited-service lodging division, 7,500 of these restricted stock shares were cancelled in fiscal 2005. The remaining unearned compensation of the restricted stock of $293,000 as of May 25, 2006 is being amortized to compensation expense over the vesting period. The restricted stock may not be sold, transferred, pledged or assigned, except as provided by the vesting schedule included in the Company’s equity incentive plan. The restricted stock cumulatively vests 25% after three years of the grant date, 50% after five years of the grant date, 75% after ten years of the grant date and 100% upon retirement.
Shareholders have approved the issuance of up to 3,437,500 shares of Common Stock under various stock option plans. The options generally become exercisable 40% after two years, 60% after three years and 80% after four years. The remaining options are exercisable five years after the date of the grant. At May 25, 2006, there were 1,623,543 shares available for grants under the current plan.
On February 24, 2006, the Company paid a special cash dividend of $7.00 per share, returning to shareholders approximately $214,576,000 in proceeds resulting from the sale of the limited-service lodging division. In connection with the special dividend, and pursuant to the terms of the Company’s various stock option plans, certain adjustments were made to the stock options outstanding under the plans in order to avoid dilution of the intended benefits to existing optionees holding outstanding options under the plans which would otherwise result as a consequence of the special dividend. All stock option data prior to the special dividend date has been restated to reflect the adjustments.
5351
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information follows:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
| (options in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 1,661 | $ | 10.28 | 2,489 | $ | 9.85 | 2,706 | $ | 9.62 | |||||||||||
| Granted | 227 | 14.16 | 212 | 12.82 | 265 | 10.27 | ||||||||||||||
| Exercised | (662 | ) | 9.81 | (701 | ) | 9.60 | (366 | ) | 8.56 | |||||||||||
| Forfeited | (69 | ) | 11.71 | (339 | ) | 10.04 | (116 | ) | 9.74 | |||||||||||
| Outstanding at end of year | 1,157 | $ | 11.22 | 1,661 | $ | 10.28 | 2,489 | $ | 9.85 | |||||||||||
| Exercisable at end of year | 493 | $ | 9.90 | 833 | $ | 9.86 | 1,183 | $ | 9.80 | |||||||||||
| Weighted-average fair value of | ||||||||||||||||||||
| options granted during year | $ | 5.22 | $ | 4.92 | $ | 3.93 | ||||||||||||||
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of May 25, 2006 ranged from $7.71 to $17.73. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of those options is 6.4 years. Additional information related to these options segregated by exercise price range is as follows:
| Exercise Price Range | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $7.71 to $10.17 | $10.18 to $12.71 | $12.72 to $17.73 | |||||||||
| (options in thousands) | |||||||||||
Options outstanding | 355 | 407 | 395 | ||||||||
| Weighted-average exercise price of options outstanding | $ | 9.04 | $ | 10.85 | $ | 13.55 | |||||
| Weighted-average remaining contractual life of options outstanding | 4.5 | 5.6 | 8.9 | ||||||||
| Options exercisable | 283 | 201 | 9 | ||||||||
| Weighted-average exercise price of options exercisable | $ | 8.84 | $ | 11.11 | $ | 16.53 | |||||
Through May 25, 2006,31, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors has approved the repurchase of up to 4,687,500 shares of Common Stock to be held in treasury. The Company intends to reissue these shares upon the exercise of stock options and for savings and profit-sharing plan contributions. The Company repurchasedpurchased 410,696, 313,416 28,295 and 33,67628,295 shares pursuant to these authorizations during fiscal 2007, 2006 2005 and 2004,2005, respectively. At May 25, 2006,31, 2007, there were 1,558,1221,147,426 shares available for repurchase under these authorizations.
The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the issuance of up to 750,000 shares of Common Stock for The Marcus Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and Associate Stock Purchase Plan. At May 25, 2006,31, 2007, there were 591,321583,408 shares available under this authorization.
Shareholders have approved the issuance of up to 3,437,500 shares of Common Stock under various equity incentive plans. Options granted under the plans to employees generally become exercisable 40% after two years, 60% after three years, 80% after four years and 100% after five years of the date of grant. The options generally expire ten years from the date of grant as long as the optionee is still employed with the Company.
Awarded shares of non-vested stock cumulatively vest either 25% after three years of the grant date, 50% after five years of the grant date, 75% after ten years of the grant date and 100% upon retirement, or 50% after three years of the grant date and 100% after five years of the grant date, depending on the date of grant. The non-vested stock may not be sold, transferred, pledged or assigned, except as provided by the vesting schedule included in the Company’s equity incentive plan. During the period of restriction, the holder of the non-vested stock has voting rights and is entitled to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to the stock. Non-vested stock awards and shares issued upon option exercises are issued from previously acquired treasury shares. At May 31, 2007, there were 1,444,115 shares available for grants of additional stock options, non-vested stock and other types of equity awards under the current plan.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, on May 26, 2006. SFAS No. 123(R) requires stock-based compensation to be expensed over the vesting period of the awards based on the grant date fair value. The Company elected to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method which does not result in the restatement of previously issued financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. In addition, compensation expense must be recognized for the amortization of unvested stock option awards outstanding as of the date of adoption. Prior to May 26, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, no compensation expense had been recognized for stock options because all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant.
52
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
The Company estimated the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for awards granted during fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005:
| Year Ended May 31, 2007 | Year Ended May 25, 2006 | Year Ended May 26, 2005 | |
|---|---|---|---|
Risk-free interest rate | 5.0% | 4.2% | 3.5% |
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Volatility | 37 - 41% | 39% | 43% |
| Expected life | 5 - 9 years | 5 years | 5 years |
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation expense was $1,326,000 in fiscal 2007 and $121,000 in both fiscal 2006 and 2005. Total pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 2006 and 2005 was entirely related to non-vested stock.
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) on May 26, 2006, the Company’s fiscal 2007 earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and net earnings were $1,073,000 and $830,000 lower, respectively, than if the Company had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB No. 25. For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007, basic and diluted net earnings per common share were $0.02 and $0.03 lower, respectively, than if the Company had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB No. 25.
The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net earnings and earnings per common share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based compensation for fiscal 2006 and 2005:
| Year Ended May 25, 2006 | Year Ended May 26, 2005 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Net earnings, as reported | $ | 28,271 | $ | 99,221 | ||||
| Add: reported stock compensation expense, net of tax | 82 | 75 | ||||||
| Deduct: stock-based employee compensation expense determined | ||||||||
| under the fair value method, net of tax | (864 | ) | (1,025 | ) | ||||
| Pro forma net earnings | $ | 27,489 | $ | 98,271 | ||||
Earnings per common share: | ||||||||
| Basic - as reported | $ | 0.96 | $ | 3.42 | ||||
| Basic - pro forma | $ | 0.93 | $ | 3.39 | ||||
| Diluted - as reported | $ | 0.91 | $ | 3.25 | ||||
| Diluted - pro forma | $ | 0.89 | $ | 3.22 | ||||
53
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information follows:
| May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
| (options in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 1,157 | $ | 11.22 | 1,661 | $ | 10.28 | 2,489 | $ | 9.85 | |||||||||||
| Granted | 195 | 19.86 | 227 | 14.16 | 212 | 12.82 | ||||||||||||||
| Exercised | (185 | ) | 10.70 | (662 | ) | 9.81 | (701 | ) | 9.60 | |||||||||||
| Forfeited | (30 | ) | 14.88 | (69 | ) | 11.71 | (339 | ) | 10.04 | |||||||||||
| Outstanding at end of year | 1,137 | $ | 12.69 | 1,157 | $ | 11.22 | 1,661 | $ | 10.28 | |||||||||||
| Exercisable at end of year | 548 | $ | 10.22 | 493 | $ | 9.90 | 833 | $ | 9.86 | |||||||||||
| Weighted-average fair value of | $8.09 | $5.22 | $4.92 | |||||||||||||||||
| options granted during year | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of May 31, 2007 ranged from $7.71 to $23.37. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of those options is 6.1 years. Additional information related to these options segregated by exercise price range is as follows:
| Exercise Price Range | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $7.71 to $10.17 | $10.18 to $12.71 | $12.72 to $17.73 | $17.74 to $23.37 | |||||||||||
| (options in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding | 298 | 291 | 362 | 186 | ||||||||||
| Weighted-average exercise price of options | ||||||||||||||
| outstanding | $ | 9.00 | $ | 10.75 | $ | 13.59 | $ | 19.86 | ||||||
| Weighted-average remaining contractual life of | ||||||||||||||
| options outstanding | 3.4 | 5.0 | 7.7 | 9.1 | ||||||||||
| Options exercisable | 297 | 181 | 66 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Weighted-average exercise price of options | ||||||||||||||
| exercisable | $ | 9.00 | $ | 10.87 | $ | 13.25 | $ | 23.24 | ||||||
The intrinsic value of options outstanding at May 31, 2007 was $12,144,000, and the intrinsic value of options exercisable at May 31, 2007 was $7,209,000. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $2,246,000, $18,283,000 and $3,221,000 during fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of May 31, 2007, total remaining unearned compensation cost related to stock options was $2,111,000, which will be amortized to expense over the remaining weighted-average service period of five years.
54
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
Following is a summary of the Company’s non-vested stock activity and related information for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007:
| Shares | Weighted-Average Fair Value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (shares in thousands) | ||||||||
Outstanding at May 26, 2006 | 59 | $ | 16.52 | |||||
| Granted | 44 | 20.26 | ||||||
| Vested | (14 | ) | 14.61 | |||||
| Forfeited | -- | -- | ||||||
| Outstanding at May 31, 2007 | 89 | $ | 18.71 | |||||
The Company previously had and will continue to expense awards of non-vested stock based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R), unearned compensation on non-vested stock was reclassified into capital in excess of par on the date of adoption. As of May 31, 2007, total remaining unearned compensation related to non-vested stock was $941,000, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining service period of 8.8 years.
The Company has a qualified profit-sharing savings plan (401(k) plan) covering eligible employees. The 401(k) plan provides for a contribution of a minimum of 1% of defined compensation for all plan participants and matching of 25% of employee contributions up to 6% of defined compensation. In addition, the Company may make additional discretionary contributions. During fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, the 1% and the discretionary contributions were made with the Company’s common stock. The Company also sponsors unfunded, nonqualified, defined-benefit and deferred compensation plans. Pension and profit-sharing expense fromrelated to continuing operations for all plans was $2,408,000, $2,243,000 $2,217,000 and $2,086,000$2,217,000 for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On May 26, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and 2004, respectively.Other Postretirement Plans, which requires the Company to recognize previously unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs in the statement of financial position and to recognize future changes in these amounts in the year in which changes occur though comprehensive income. Additionally, the Company is required to measure the funded status of its plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position.
55
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
The adoption of SFAS No. 158 had no effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings for the year ended May 31, 2007, or for any prior period presented, and it will not affect the Company’s operating results in future periods. The incremental effects of adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 158 on the Company’s statement of financial position at May 31, 2007 are presented in the following table:
| At May 31, 2007 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prior to Adopting SFAS No. 158 | Effect of Adopting SFAS No. 158 | As Reported | |||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | $ | 30,546 | $ | (1,170 | ) | $ | 29,376 | ||||
| Other accrued liabilities | 23,961 | 785 | 24,746 | ||||||||
| Deferred compensation and other | 20,790 | 2,140 | 22,930 | ||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | |||||||||||
| (loss) | 240 | (1,755 | ) | (1,515 | ) | ||||||
The status of the Company’s unfunded nonqualified, defined-benefit plan based on the respective May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 200525, 2006 measurement dates is as follows:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Change in benefit obligation: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 16,090 | $ | 12,676 | $ | 16,896 | $ | 16,090 | ||||||||
| Service cost | 412 | 369 | 432 | 412 | ||||||||||||
| Interest cost | 877 | 891 | 1,085 | 877 | ||||||||||||
| Actuarial (gain) loss | (239 | ) | 2,371 | |||||||||||||
| Actuarial gain | (1,477 | ) | (239 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Benefits paid | (244 | ) | (217 | ) | (250 | ) | (244 | ) | ||||||||
| Net benefit obligation at end of year | $ | 16,896 | $ | 16,090 | $ | 16,686 | $ | 16,896 | ||||||||
Funded status at end of year | $ | (16,896 | ) | $ | (16,090 | ) | $ | (16,686 | ) | $ | (16,896 | ) | ||||
| Unrecognized net actuarial loss | 4,583 | 5,001 | -- | 4,583 | ||||||||||||
| Unrecognized prior service cost | 5 | 9 | -- | 5 | ||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | 2,925 | -- | ||||||||||||||
| Net amount recognized at end of year | $ | (12,308 | ) | $ | (11,080 | ) | $ | (13,761 | ) | $ | (12,308 | ) | ||||
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of: | ||||||||||||||||
| Accrued benefit liability | $ | (12,308 | ) | $ | (11,080 | ) | ||||||||||
| Current accrued benefit liability | $ | (785 | ) | $ | (250 | ) | ||||||||||
| Noncurrent accrued benefit liability | (15,901 | ) | (12,058 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Additional minimum liability | (24 | ) | (756 | ) | -- | (24 | ) | |||||||||
| Intangible asset | 5 | 9 | -- | 5 | ||||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | 11 | 451 | 1,755 | 11 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred tax asset | 8 | 296 | 1,170 | 8 | ||||||||||||
| Net amount recognized at end of year | $ | (12,308 | ) | $ | (11,080 | ) | $ | (13,761 | ) | $ | (12,308 | ) | ||||
| Year ended | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | |||||||||
| Net periodic pension cost: | |||||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 412 | $ | 369 | $ | 463 | |||||
| Interest cost | 877 | 891 | 767 | ||||||||
| Net amortization of prior service cost, transition | |||||||||||
| obligation and actuarial loss | 184 | 198 | 242 | ||||||||
| $ | 1,473 | $ | 1,458 | $ | 1,472 | ||||||
5556
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
| Year ended | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost: | |||||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 432 | $ | 412 | $ | 369 | |||||
| Interest cost | 1,085 | 877 | 891 | ||||||||
| Net amortization of prior service cost, transition obligation | |||||||||||
| and actuarial loss | 186 | 184 | 198 | ||||||||
| $ | 1,703 | $ | 1,473 | $ | 1,458 | ||||||
The $1,755,000 loss, net of tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at May 31, 2007, is the net actuarial loss which has not yet been recognized in the net periodic benefit cost.
The accumulated benefit obligation was $12,332,000$12,464,000 and $11,836,000$12,332,000 as of May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, respectively.
The benefit obligations were determined using an assumed weighted-average discount rate of 6.10% and 6.25% in 2007 and 5.50% in 2006, and 2005, respectively, and an annual salary rate increase of 5.0% for both years.
The net periodic benefit cost was determined using an assumed discount rate of 5.5%6.25%, 5.5% and 6.5% in 2007, 2006 and 5.75% in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and an annual salary rate increase of 5.0% for all three years.
Benefit payments expected to be paid subsequent to May 25, 200631, 2007 are:
| Fiscal Year | Fiscal Year | (in thousands) | Fiscal Year | (in thousands) | ||||||
| 2007 | $ | 776 | ||||||||
| 2008 | 780 | $ | 785,439 | |||||||
| 2009 | 897 | 903,872 | ||||||||
| 2010 | 920 | 907,828 | ||||||||
| 2011 | 933 | 920,140 | ||||||||
| Years 2012-2016 | 5,471 | |||||||||
| 2012 | 944,076 | |||||||||
| Years 2013 - 2017 | 5,280,197 | |||||||||
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based upon the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
57
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
The components of the net deferred tax liability for continuing operations were as follows:
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Current deferred income tax assets (liabilities): | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | -- | $ | (20 | ) | |||
| Accrued employee benefits | 5,413 | 5,039 | ||||||
| Other accrued liabilities | 485 | 445 | ||||||
| Net current deferred tax assets | $ | 5,898 | $ | 5,464 | ||||
Noncurrent deferred income tax (liabilities) assets: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | (28,823 | ) | $ | (27,905 | ) | ||
| Accrued employee benefits | 741 | 708 | ||||||
| Other accrued liabilities | 136 | 583 | ||||||
| Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities | $ | (27,946 | ) | $ | (26,614 | ) | ||
56
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
| May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Current deferred income tax assets: | ||||||||
| Accrued employee benefits | $ | 544 | $ | 5,413 | ||||
| Other accrued liabilities | 512 | 485 | ||||||
| Net current deferred tax assets | $ | 1,056 | $ | 5,898 | ||||
| Noncurrent deferred income tax (liabilities) assets: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | (37,473 | ) | $ | (28,823 | ) | ||
| Accrued employee benefits | 8,161 | 741 | ||||||
| Other accrued liabilities | (64 | ) | 136 | |||||
| Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities | $ | (29,376 | ) | $ | (27,946 | ) | ||
Income tax expense for continuing operations consists of the following:
| Year ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Currently payable: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currently payable (refundable): | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | 7,871 | $ | 6,976 | $ | 8,130 | $ | 8,753 | $ | 7,871 | $ | 6,976 | ||||||||||
| State | 2,851 | 1,908 | 2,039 | (1,244 | ) | 2,851 | 1,908 | |||||||||||||||
| Deferred (benefit) expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal | (266 | ) | 2,507 | 1,579 | 1,813 | (266 | ) | 2,507 | ||||||||||||||
| State | (37 | ) | 351 | 208 | 254 | (37 | ) | 351 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 10,419 | $ | 11,742 | $ | 11,956 | $ | 9,576 | $ | 10,419 | $ | 11,742 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense is included in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings as follows:
| Year ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 10,419 | $ | 11,742 | $ | 11,956 | $ | 9,576 | $ | 10,419 | $ | 11,742 | ||||||||||
| Discontinued operations | 2,925 | 51,714 | 3,896 | (30 | ) | 2,925 | 51,714 | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 13,344 | $ | 63,456 | $ | 15,852 | $ | 9,546 | $ | 13,344 | $ | 63,456 | |||||||||||
58
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
A reconciliation of the statutory federal tax rate to the effective tax rate for continuing operations follows:
| Year ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
Statutory federal tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 5.5 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 5.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal tax exempt interest | (5.9 | ) | (3.1 | ) | -- | (0.6 | ) | (5.9 | ) | (3.1 | ) | |||||||||||
| Federal and state historic tax credits | (18.0 | ) | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other | (2.9 | ) | 0.4 | (0.5 | ) | 0.5 | (2.9 | ) | 0.4 | |||||||||||||
| 31.7 | % | 37.5 | % | 39.2 | % | 22.0 | % | 31.7 | % | 37.5 | % | |||||||||||
Income taxes paid, net of refunds received, in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 totaled $4,796,000, $14,374,000 and 2004 totaled $14,374,000, $82,485,000, and $12,907,000, respectively.
57
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
Lease Commitments – The Company leases real estate under various noncancellable operating leases with an initial term greater than one year that contain multiple renewal options, exercisable at the Company’s option. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term, including cancelable option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty. Percentage rentals are based on the revenues at the specific rented property. Certain sublease agreements include buyout incentives. Rent expense charged to operations under these leases was as follows:
| Year Ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | May 27, 2004 | May 31, 2007 | May 25, 2006 | May 26, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed minimum rentals | $ | 2,833 | $ | 1,866 | $ | 1,750 | $ | 2,957 | $ | 2,833 | $ | 1,866 | ||||||||||
| Amortization of favorable lease right | 676 | -- | -- | 354 | 676 | -- | ||||||||||||||||
| Percentage rentals | 121 | 135 | 137 | 102 | 121 | 135 | ||||||||||||||||
| Sublease rental income | -- | (12 | ) | (42 | ) | -- | -- | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||
| $ | 3,630 | $ | 1,989 | $ | 1,845 | $ | 3,413 | $ | 3,630 | $ | 1,989 | |||||||||||
59
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
Aggregate minimum rental commitments under long-term operating leases, assuming the exercise of certain lease options, are as follows at May 25, 2006:31, 2007:
| Fiscal Year | Fiscal Year | (in thousands) | Fiscal Year | (in thousands) | ||||||
| 2007 | $ | 2,523 | ||||||||
| 2008 | 2,455 | $ | 3,521 | |||||||
| 2009 | 2,448 | 3,562 | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2,534 | 3,678 | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2,486 | 3,634 | ||||||||
| 2012 | 3,529 | |||||||||
| Thereafter | 52,795 | 72,884 | ||||||||
| $ | 65,241 | $ | 90,808 | |||||||
Commitments – The Company has commitments for the completion of construction at various properties and the purchase of various properties totaling approximately $41,356,000$7,075,000 at May 25, 2006.31, 2007.
License Rights – The Company has license rights to operate twothree hotels using the Hilton trademark, one hotel using the Four Points by Sheraton trademark one hotel using the Wyndham trademark, and one hotel using the WestinInterContinental trademark. Under the terms of the licenses, the Company is obligated to pay fees based on defined gross sales.
Contingencies – The Company guarantees the debt of joint ventures and other entities totaling $5,034,000$4,835,000 at May 25, 2006.31, 2007. The debt of the joint ventures is collateralized by the real estate, buildings and improvements and all equipment of each joint venture. The Company does not anticipate these guarantees to be payable.
58
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 2006
The Company has approximately sevensix and one half years remaining on a ten and one half-year office lease. On July 7, 2005, the lease was amended in order to exit leased office space for the Company’s former limited-service lodging division. To induce the landlord to amend the lease, the Company guaranteed the lease obligations of the new tenant of the relinquished space throughout the remaining term of the lease. The maximum amount of future payments the Company could be required to pay if the new tenant defaults on its lease obligations was approximately $3,271,000$2,854,000 as of May 25, 2006.31, 2007.
At May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, the Company held investments with aggregate carrying values of $7,487,000$1,868,000 and $6,658,000,$7,487,000, respectively, in several joint ventures, excludingventures. The investments are accounted for under the carrying values of investments in discontinued joint ventures.equity method. Included in the May 25, 2006 investments in joint ventures totals istotal was a 50% ownership interest in Platinum Condominium Development, LLC, a joint venture developingthat developed a condominium hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. TheNevada, with a carrying value of $7,324,000.
60
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2007
During fiscal 2007, the investmentCompany acquired the ownership interests of its joint venture partners in Platinum Condominium Development, LLC, thus increasing the Company’s ownership of the property’s public space to 100%. The total purchase price was $7,324,000$11,000,000, including approximately $6,249,000 in prepaid development fees. As a result of these transactions, effective October 31, 2006, the assets and $5,327,000 at May 25,liabilities of the Platinum Hotel, as well as the results of its operations, are now reported in the Company’s consolidated results. Prior to October 31, 2006, and May 26, 2005, respectively. The investments arethe joint venture was accounted for underusing the equity method.method of accounting.
During fiscal 2004, the Company recordedAs a $585,000 loss on the termination and disposal of a discontinued joint venture and paid $930,000 under the Company’s guaranteeresult of the joint venture’s outstanding debt.purchase, the assets and liabilities, consisting primarily of condominium units held for sale, prepaid development fees, land, building and fixtures and other accrued liabilities are now reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. The consolidated financial statements reflect the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their respective fair value, which approximates the purchase price. Pro forma information is not required as the impact to the results of operations is not significant.
The costs of the condominium hotel development project attributable to the condominium units to be sold have been classified as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2007.
The Company has receivables from the discontinued joint ventures of $3,386,000$3,732,000 and $2,704,000$3,385,000 at May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, respectively. The Company earns interest on $3,298,000$3,732,000 and $2,616,000$3,298,000 of the net receivables at approximately prime to prime plus 1.5% at May 25, 200631, 2007 and May 26, 2005,25, 2006, respectively.
Included in notes payable at May 31, 2007 and May 25, 2006 is $239,000 and May 26, 2005 is $500,000, and $774,000, respectively, dueowed to discontinued joint ventures in connection with cash advanced to the Company. The Company pays interest on the cash advances based on the 90-day certificate of deposit rates.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on the operating income (loss) of each segment. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
5961
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
Following is a summary of business segment information for fiscal 20042005 through 2006:2007:
| Theatres | Hotels/ Resorts | Corporate Items | Continuing Operations Total | Discontinued Operations | Total | Theatres | Hotels/ Resorts | Corporate Items | Continuing Operations Total | Discontinued Operations | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 156,451 | $ | 169,942 | $ | 1,238 | $ | 327,631 | $ | 4,060 | $ | 331,691 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 34,561 | 15,792 | (9,214 | ) | 41,139 | (224 | ) | 40,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 11,826 | 14,336 | 751 | 26,913 | 12 | 26,925 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity losses from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| unconsolidated joint ventures | (149 | ) | (1,217 | ) | -- | (1,366 | ) | (367 | ) | (1,733 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | 320,280 | 329,245 | 47,883 | 697,408 | 975 | 698,383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| acquisitions | 115,403 | 70,606 | 743 | 186,752 | -- | 186,752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 145,990 | $ | 141,917 | $ | 1,337 | $ | 289,244 | $ | 5,358 | $ | 294,602 | $ | 145,990 | $ | 141,917 | $ | 1,337 | $ | 289,244 | $ | 5,358 | $ | 294,602 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 32,481 | 15,613 | (8,554 | ) | 39,540 | (2,859 | ) | 36,681 | 32,481 | 15,613 | (8,554 | ) | 39,540 | (2,859 | ) | 36,681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 12,372 | 12,632 | 1,127 | 26,131 | 143 | 26,274 | 12,372 | 12,632 | 1,127 | 26,131 | 143 | 26,274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity losses from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| unconsolidated joint ventures | (985 | ) | (850 | ) | (33 | ) | (1,868 | ) | (106 | ) | (1,974 | ) | (985 | ) | (850 | ) | (33 | ) | (1,868 | ) | (106 | ) | (1,974 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Assets | 220,595 | 285,132 | 73,962 | 579,689 | 7,545 | 587,234 | 220,595 | 285,132 | 73,962 | 579,689 | 7,545 | 587,234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures and other | 8,394 | 65,816 | 1,187 | 75,397 | 135 | 75,532 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| acquisitions | 8,394 | 65,816 | 1,187 | 75,397 | 135 | 75,532 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 149,125 | $ | 116,532 | $ | 1,401 | $ | 267,058 | $ | 52,538 | $ | 319,596 | $ | 149,125 | $ | 116,532 | $ | 1,401 | $ | 267,058 | $ | 52,538 | $ | 319,596 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 34,791 | 12,658 | (8,547 | ) | 38,902 | 2,966 | 41,868 | 34,791 | 12,658 | (8,547 | ) | 38,902 | 2,966 | 41,868 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 12,148 | 10,955 | 1,400 | 24,503 | 3,899 | 28,402 | 12,148 | 10,955 | 1,400 | 24,503 | 3,899 | 28,402 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity earnings (losses) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| unconsolidated joint ventures | (264 | ) | (863 | ) | 37 | (1,090 | ) | (477 | ) | (1,567 | ) | (264 | ) | (863 | ) | 37 | (1,090 | ) | (477 | ) | (1,567 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | 226,127 | 243,896 | 294,616 | 764,639 | 22,860 | 787,499 | 226,127 | 243,896 | 294,616 | 764,639 | 22,860 | 787,499 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures and other | 35,858 | 21,520 | 1,504 | 58,882 | 4,549 | 63,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 155,732 | $ | 112,266 | $ | 1,223 | $ | 269,221 | $ | 140,332 | $ | 409,553 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 38,933 | 12,378 | (8,333 | ) | 42,978 | 11,288 | 54,266 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 11,782 | 11,530 | 1,532 | 24,844 | 21,192 | 46,036 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity earnings (losses) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| unconsolidated joint ventures | -- | (497 | ) | 58 | (439 | ) | (346 | ) | (785 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | 204,711 | 203,368 | 43,670 | 451,749 | 298,062 | 749,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures and other | 10,973 | 15,064 | 399 | 26,436 | 24,479 | 50,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| acquisitions | 35,858 | 21,520 | 1,504 | 58,882 | 4,549 | 63,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate items include amounts not allocable to the business segments. Corporate revenues consist principally of rent and the corporate operating loss includes general corporate expenses. Corporate information technology costs and accounting shared services costs are allocated to the business segments based upon several factors, including actual usage and segment revenues. Corporate assets primarily include cash and cash equivalents, investments, notes receivable, receivables from joint ventures and land held for development.
6062
THE MARCUS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 25, 200631, 2007
12. Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information(in thousands, except per share data)
| 13 Weeks Ended | 13 Weeks Ended | 14 Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal 2006 | August 25, 2005 | November 24, 2005 | February 23, 2006 | May 25, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fiscal 2007 | Fiscal 2007 | August 24, 2006 | November 23, 2006 | February 22, 2007 | May 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 86,245 | $ | 67,025 | $ | 68,751 | $ | 67,223 | $ | 93,407 | $ | 70,605 | $ | 71,418 | $ | 92,201 | ||||||||||||
| Operating income | 18,486 | 8,300 | 5,637 | 7,117 | 21,182 | 8,467 | 1,853 | 9,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | 15,489 | 5,044 | 4,723 | 3,015 | 13,707 | 10,091 | 4,028 | 5,471 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per basic share | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per diluted share | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per common share - diluted(1) | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 Weeks Ended | 13 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal 2005 | August 26, 2004 | November 25, 2004 | February 24, 2005 | May 26, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fiscal 2006 | Fiscal 2006 | August 25, 2005 | November 24, 2005 | February 23, 2006 | May 25, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 85,215 | $ | 60,695 | $ | 61,426 | $ | 59,722 | $ | 86,245 | $ | 67,025 | $ | 68,751 | $ | 67,223 | ||||||||||||
| Operating income | 21,325 | 8,001 | 5,203 | 4,373 | 18,487 | 8,299 | 5,637 | 7,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | 18,145 | 71,588 | 6,595 | 2,893 | 15,489 | 5,044 | 4,723 | 3,015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per basic share | $ | 0.61 | $ | 2.38 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per diluted share | $ | 0.60 | $ | 2.34 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per common share - diluted(1) | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The results for(1) Calculated on our Common Stock using the first three quarters of fiscal 2006 and all four quarters of fiscal 2005 have been restated to reflect certain reclassifications in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and to reflect Marcus Vacation Club as discontinued operations.two-class method.
6163
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
None.
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures. |
| (a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. |
Based on their evaluations, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or furnish under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
| (b) | Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. |
The report of management required under this Item 9A is contained in the section titled “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” under the heading “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”
| (c) | Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
The attestation report required under this Item 9A is contained in the section titled “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” under the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”
| (d) | Changes in internal control over financial reporting. |
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act during the fourth quarter of our fiscal 20062007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
| Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Company. |
The information required by this item with respect to directors is incorporated herein by reference to the information pertaining thereto set forth under the caption entitled “Election of Directors” in the definitive Proxy Statement for our 20062007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held on October 4, 200616, 2007 (our “Proxy Statement”). The information required with respect to executive officers appears at the end of Part I of this Form 10-K. The required information with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by directors and executive officers is incorporated by reference to the information pertaining thereto set forth under the caption entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement.
We have adopted a written code of conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, which is available on our corporate web site (www.marcuscorp.com). No amendments to our code of conduct, or waivers from our code of conduct with respect to any of our executive officers or directors, have been made. If, in the future, we amend our code of conduct, or grant waivers from our code of conduct with respect to any of our executive officers or directors, we will make information regarding such amendments or waivers available on our corporate web site (www.marcuscorp.com) for a period of at least 12 months.
62
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation. |
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information pertaining thereto set forth under the caption entitled “Executive Compensation”“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in our Proxy Statement.
64
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. |
The following table lists certain information about our three stock option plans, our 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, our 1994 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan and our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, all of which were approved by our shareholders:
| Number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under current equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in the first column) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,157,000 | $11.22 | 1,624,000 |
| Number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under current equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in the first column) |
|---|---|---|
1,137,000 | $12.69 | 1,444,000 |
The other information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information pertaining thereto set forth under the caption entitled “Stock Ownership of Management and Others” in our Proxy Statement.
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. |
The information required by this item, to the extent applicable, is incorporated herein by reference to the information pertaining thereto set forth under the caption entitled “Certain Transactions” in our Proxy Statement.
| Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services. |
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference herein to the information pertaining thereto set forth under the caption “Other Matters” in our Proxy Statement.
| Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
| (a)(1) | Financial Statements. |
The information required by this item is set forth in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” above.
| (a)(2) | Financial Statement Schedules. |
All schedules are omitted because they are inapplicable, not required under the instructions or the financial information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
| (a)(3) | Exhibits. |
The exhibits filed herewith or incorporated by reference herein are set forth on the attached Exhibit Index.*
*Exhibits to this Form 10-K will be furnished to shareholders upon advance payment of a fee of $0.25 per page, plus mailing expenses. Requests for copies should be addressed to Thomas F. Kissinger, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, The Marcus Corporation, 100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1900, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202-4125.
6365
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| THE MARCUS CORPORATION | ||
Date: August | By: /s/ Stephen H. Marcus | |
| Stephen H. Marcus, | ||
| Chairman of the Board, President | ||
| and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of us and in the capacities as of the date indicated above.
| By: | By: | ||
| Stephen H. Marcus, Chairman of the | Daniel F. McKeithan, Jr., Director | ||
| Board, President and Chief Executive | |||
| Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
By: | /s/ Douglas A. Neis | By: | |
| Douglas A. Neis, Chief Financial | Diane Marcus Gershowitz, Director | ||
| Officer and Treasurer (Principal | |||
| Financial Officer and Accounting | |||
| Officer) | |||
By: | /s/ Bruce J. Olson | By: | |
| Bruce J. Olson, Director | Timothy E. Hoeksema, Director | ||
By: | /s/ Philip L. Milstein | By: | |
| Philip L. Milstein, Director | Allan H. Selig, Director | ||
By: | /s/ Bronson J. Haase | By: | |
| Bronson J. Haase, Director | James D. Ericson, Director | ||
By: | /s/ Gregory S. Marcus | ||
| Gregory S. Marcus, Director |
The most recent certifications by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. We have also filed with the New York Stock Exchange the most recent Annual CEO Certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual.
S-1
EXHIBIT INDEX
| 2.1 | Asset Purchase Agreement dated |
| 3.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 13, 1997.] |
| 3.2 | Bylaws, as amended as of July 18, 2006. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2006.] |
| The Marcus Corporation Note Purchase Agreement dated October 25, 1996. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 14, 1996.] |
| 4.2 | First Supplement to Note Purchase Agreements dated May 15, 1998. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 1998.] |
| 4.3 | Second Supplement to Note Purchase Agreements dated May 7, 1999. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 27, 1999.] |
| 4.4 | Third Supplement to Note Purchase Agreements dated April 1, 2002. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2002.] |
| 4.5 | Credit Agreement dated April 30, 2004, by and among The Marcus Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, Bank of America, N.A., Bank One, NA, LaSalle Bank National Association, and the other financial institutions party hereto. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 27, 2004.] |
| Other than as set forth in Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 |
| 10.1* | The Marcus Corporation 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit |
| 10.2* | The Marcus Corporation 1994 Nonemployee Director Stock Option |
| 10.3* | The Marcus Corporation 2004 Equity Incentive |
E-1
| 10.4* | Form of The Marcus Corporation 2004 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Award (Employees). [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2005.] |
E-1
| 10.5* | Form of The Marcus Corporation 2004 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Award (Non-Employee Directors). [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2005.] |
| 10.6* | Form of The Marcus Corporation Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2005.] |
| 10.7* | The Marcus Corporation |
| 10.8* | The Marcus Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May |
| 10.9* | The Marcus Corporation Retirement Income Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 25, 2006.] |
| 21 | Our subsidiaries as of May |
| 23 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. |
| 31.1 | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 31.2 | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 |
| 99.1 | Administrative Services Agreement between Marcus Investments, LLC and The Marcus Corporation, as amended, dated |
| 99.2 | Proxy Statement for the |
*This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this form pursuant to Item 14(c) of Form 10-K.
E-2