UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

x[X]Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

For the year ended December 31, 20022003

or

 

¨[    ]Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from                    to                    .

 

Commission File Number ( 0-22292 )


 

Captiva Software Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

77-0104275

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

10145 Pacific Heights Blvd.Boulevard

San Diego, CA 92121

(858) 320-1000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001$0.01 par value

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx    X    No¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨[    ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). Yes¨Nox    X    

 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of June 28, 200230, 2003, was approximately $5,767,684$38,274,365 (based on the closing price for shares of the registrant’s Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market for the last trading day prior toon that date). Shares of Common Stock held by each officer, director and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.001$0.01 par value, as of February 28, 200329, 2004 was 8,859,953.10,938,083.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 2003registrant’s 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this Report. Such Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the registrant’s year ended December 31, 2002.2003.

 

Certain exhibits filed with the registrant’s (i) Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 20, 2002, (ii) Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (Registration No. 33-66142), (iii) Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 24, 1997, (iv) Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on September 10, 1997 (Registration No. 000-22292), (v) Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 29, 2002, (vi) Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 2, 2001, (vii) Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-87106) and (viii) Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2003, are incorporated by reference into Part IV of this Report.



CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

 

FORM 10-K

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 20022003

 

INDEX

 

Part I       

Page


Part I

Item 1.

    

Business

  

1

Item 2.

    

Properties

  

18

19

Item 3.

    

Legal Proceedings

  

18

19

Item 4.

    

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  

18

19

Part II

Item 5.

    

Item 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock andEquity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  

19

20

Item 6.

    

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

  

20

Item 7.

    

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  

21

Item 7A.

    

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  

35

37

Item 8.

    

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  

35

38

Item 9.

    

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosures

  

35

38
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures38

Part III

Item 10.

    

Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

  

36

39

Item 11.

    

Executive Compensation

  

36

39

Item 12.

    

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Managementand Related Stockholder Matters

  

36

39

Item 13.

    

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

  

36

40
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services40

Item 14.

Part IV
    

Controls and Procedures

  

36

Part IV

Item 15.

    

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

  

38

40

Signatures

  

40

43

 

i


PART I

 

Item 1.

BusinessItem 1.

Business

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminologyterms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of suchthese terms or other words of similar meaning. These statements are only predictions based on information currently available to us. Actual events or results may differ materially. Important factors whichthat may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements are described in the Sectionsection entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport and in other risks identified from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases and other communications.

 

Although we believe that the estimates and expectations reflected in theour forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We assume no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

 

Overview

 

We are a leading provider of input management solutions designed to manage business critical information from paper, faxed and electronic forms, documents and transactions into the enterprise. Our solutions automate the processing of billions of forms, documents and transactions annually, converting their content into information that is usable in database, document, content, and other information management systems. We believe that our products and services enable organizations to reduce operating costs, obtain higher information accuracy rates, and speed processing times.

Our products offer organizations a cost-effective, accurate, and automated alternative to both manual data entry and electronic data interchange (EDI). These traditional approaches are typically labor intensive, time consuming and costly methods of managing the input of information into the enterprise. Organizations can utilize our products to capture information digitally, extract the meaningful content or data, and apply business rules that ensure the data’s accuracy. Our solutions serve thousands of users in insurance, financial services, business process outsourcing (BPO), government, manufacturing, and other markets. Enterprises that have purchased our products and services include American Express, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oklahoma, Electronic Data Systems, FileNet, Fujitsu, GEICO, National City Corporation, and Texas Workforce Commission.

In February 2004, we acquired ADP Context Inc. (Context), a business unit of ADP Claims Solutions Group, Inc. and a part of the worldwide Automatic Data Processing, Inc. family of companies, for approximately $5.2 million in cash. Context’s products provide automated solutions to complex medical claims coding, editing and reimbursement challenges in the healthcare industry and allow us to better serve our claims processing customers and expand our reach in the healthcare insurance market.

Captiva Software Corporation is a result ofresulted from the merger of ActionPoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (ActionPoint), with Captiva Software Corporation, a California corporation (Old Captiva). The merger was consummated during, in the third quarter of 2002.2002 (the Merger). In this transaction, Captiva Software Corporation became a wholly owned subsidiary of ActionPoint, and ActionPoint changed its name to Captiva Software Corporation and remained a Delaware Corporation.

 

ActionPoint was incorporated in California in January 1986 and was reincorporated in Delaware in September 1993. Our principal executive offices are located at 10145 Pacific Heights Boulevard, San Diego, California 92121, and our telephone number is (858) 320-1000.

We develop, market, deploy320-1000 and service input management solutions used to manage business critical information from paper, faxed and scanned forms and documents, Internet forms and extensible markup language (XML) data streams into enterprises in a more accurate, timely and cost-effective manner. These solutions automate the processing of billions of forms and documents annually, converting their contents into information that is usable in database, enterprise content management, enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, financial accounting and other information management systems.

Ourour Internet website address is www.captivasoftware.com. We were incorporated in California in January 1986 and were reincorporated in Delaware in September 1993. Our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly

reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, are available free of charge through the investor relations section of our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after being filed with or furnished to the SEC.

 

Industry Background

 

The Input Management Problem.Problem

Enormous quantities of printed and electronic information flow into businesses, government agencies and other organizations on a daily basis. Most of this information comes from customers, suppliers, employees and other third parties conducting transactions or corresponding with the organization through the use of paper and electronic forms and documents. Examples of these forms and documents include medical claims, credit applications,such as letters, resumes, new account enrollments, credit applications, tax returns, invoices, legal briefs, and regulatory filings and otherfilings.

Pertinent information intensive forms and documents. Some parties have predicted that the use of paperfrom these forms and documents will rapidly decline in favor of their electronic counterparts. In fact, the use of both information mediums is increasing at a significant rate and both paper and electronic forms and documents are expected to remain in use

for the foreseeable future. For example, in 2000 Xerox Corporation stated that the percentage of paper versus electronic documents is expected to decline from 90% today to 40% in 2005 but also predicted a 400% increase in the volume of printed pages. These increases have and will continue to fuel rapid growth in the amount of information that needs to be entered into database, enterprise content management, enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, financial accounting and other information management systems.

Regardless of the source, pertinent information must be collected, extracted, perfected, formatted and exported intoto an organization’s information management systems as quickly and cost effectively, accurately and quickly as possible. Irrelevant,Processing delays, incorrect or invalid data processing delays and inefficient methods can adversely impact an organization’s revenues, operating expenses and interactions with customers, suppliers and employees. For example, an incorrect policy number forAccording to Strategy Partners, a medical insurance claim can causeconsultancy firm specializing in enterprise content management (ECM), the claim to be rejected, which necessitates a second submission and processing cycle or exception processing and additional correspondence, causing delays in payment to the provider, telephone calls from both the provider and the insured and a reduced level of customer satisfaction. Conversely, accurate, timely and cost effective input management processes can increase an organization’s revenue, reduce its expenses and improve its relationships with customers, suppliers and employees.software market is expected to exceed $1.2 billion in 2004.

 

Current Approaches are Inadequate.Inadequate    Current approaches to

Traditional methods for capturing data from paper forms and documents rely principally upon manual data entry. According to Harvey Spencer Associates, a consultancy firm specializing in input management,ECM, organizations in the United States spend $15 billion a year manually keying data from forms alone. Organizations generally perform this work internally or outsource it to business process outsourcingBPO firms. BothBut both approaches have inherent problems. Organizations performing this work internally usually distribute it on a departmental basis, where higherhighly paid knowledge workers often manually key data directly into information management systems with minimal data validation and low productivity rates. As a result, theThe accuracy of the manually entered information canand processing times usually suffer, and manual entrycosts incurred from both erroneous data and poorly utilized human resources are high.

Gartner Group, an independent information technology research firm, estimates that the amount of time wasted on these document management tasks is significant and increasing. In 1997, Gartner estimated that knowledge workers spent about eight hours per week or 20% of their time on document management tasks. In 2003, Gartner increased this estimate to between 12 and 16 hours per week or 30% and 40% of their time. Additional data gathered by Gartner indicated that:

the average document is copied, either physically or electronically, nine to 11 times at a relatively expensive formcost of about $18;
the cost to file each document is about $20; and
the cost to find a misfiled document processing method. Business process outsourcingis about $120.

BPO firms whichthat specialize in performing this type of work typically achieve higher productivity rates use less costly data entry operators and locations and typically offerat a more cost effective approach.lower cost. However, unpredictable data accuracy and turnaround times as well as an overall loss of control impede the adoption, of this approach, particularly for confidential or time sensitive forms and documents.documents and for government agencies sensitive to the increased outsourcing of jobs to offshore firms.

 

Alternative approaches to manually capturing data include electronic data interchange (EDI), electronic forms and documents and, more recently, Internet applications. AllEach of these approaches havealso has inherent problems and limitations. Electronic data interchangeEDI is difficult to implement and has been adopted in only a few vertical markets, such as medical claims processing, where weprocessing. We believe approximately 40%60% of all medical claims continue to be submitted on paper forms. ElectronicThe growth in use of electronic forms and documents suffer from and Internet-based transactions is limited by

user concerns about the security of the transaction,transactions, the absence of a standard data exchange format and the limited acceptance of legally binding, digital signatures. As a result, the use

These alternative input management methods frequently have minimal data validation capabilities, are incapable of electroniccapturing data from paper forms and documents, has usually been limited to certain types of intra-company applications. The Internet provides a platform for e-commerce applications, which have potentially broad applicability but suffer from high Internet site abandonment rates. According to Forrester Research, an independent information technology research firm, less than 5% of visitors to an e-commerce site attempt to purchase and only 33% of those attempting to purchase actually do so. Similarly, large financial service and insurance companies report that over 95% of all Internet transactions are abandoned prior to completion.

All of these alternative input management methods require substantial custom application development and maintenance, feature minimal data validation capabilities, are disparate, single point technologies and are incapable of capturing data from legacy and new paper forms, documents and attachments.maintenance. Gartner Group another independent information technology research firm, estimates that, for every dollar spent on Internet applications, software organizations should expect to spend from five$5 to twenty dollars$20 on services, especiallyprincipally for the integration of Internet applications with existing information management systems.

 

Many organizations processing paper and electronic data intensive transactions are acutely aware of these problems and seeking a more comprehensive solution. The problems with manual processing and the benefits of

automation in input management and processing will become increasingly evident asAs the volume of forms and documents processed grows. Accordingcontinues to Strategy Partners, an independent information technology researchgrow, many organizations processing paper and consulting firm, the worldwideelectronic forms and documents are seeking a more comprehensive solution to address their input management software market amountedproblems. We believe there is a significant opportunity to more than $1 billion in 2002.help organizations automate their input management processes, reduce operating costs, obtain higher information accuracy rates and speed processing times.

 

Our SolutionSolutions

 

Our solution provides a universal input management platformproducts and related services, that providewhich we refer to together as our “solutions”, allow our customers withto realize the following benefits:

 

An Input Management Process That is More Accurate, Timely, Cost Effective, Accurate and Subject to Configurable Business Rules.Timely    Our software allows

By automating previously manual processes, our solutions enable our customers to capture information from allmultiple sources in a more accurate, timely and cost effective, accurate and timely manner while consistently applying a configurable set of business rules throughout the process. These business rules allow the information to be automatically verified and properly routed. This allows ourthan otherwise possible. Our customers to achieve lower operating costs, higher information accuracy rates and faster processing times and lower operating costs.times. These benefits can increase the user’sour customers’ revenues, reduce their expenses, accelerate their business processes and help improve their relationships with customers, suppliers and employees. We believe our solutions typically provide a 12 to 18 month return on investment (ROI) through reduced manual data entry costs alone, and also improve the quality and timeliness of information, which further increases the ROI.

 

Rapid Implementation Timeframes.Timeframes

Our software utilizes a single, integrated environmentproducts utilize graphically oriented, easy to use, development modules that enablesenable rapid application development, testing and deployment. We also offer professional services to assist customers with these tasks or to perform them entirely on their behalf. These capabilitiesOur solutions allow Captiva’sour customers to achieve lowerreduce implementation costs and shortershorten implementation timeframes.

 

A Highly Flexible, Open and Scalable System.System

Our software products provide a modular platform withusing an open architecture that is scalable from a single personal computer to large, computermulti-user networks processing from several hundred to hundreds of thousands of forms and documents aper day. This allows our customers to configure systems and supplement our software productssolutions with third partythird-party software and hardware products in order to meet their unique requirements and easily expand their systems should the need arise.

 

An Increased Return onEase in Extracting and Exporting Information Technology Investments.    Our software products typically provide a 12- to 24-month return on investment through reduced manual data entry costs alone. They also improve the quality and timeliness of information, which significantly increases its value.

 

The AbilityOur solutions are able to Capture Data from Diverse Sourcesextract and Export Data to Most Information Management Systems.    Our solution enables captureimprove the accuracy of information from paper, faxed and scanned forms documents and attachments,documents, electronic forms and electronic data in XMLan EDI or an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) format. Hybrid means transactions in which information must be captured from more than one source; for example, a credit application submitted via an electronic form and the related paper attachments, such as tax returns and W-2 forms submitted via fax, both of which contain information required to complete the process. Our solutionsolutions also providesprovide the ability to export datainformation in manymultiple formats, including XML, to mostalmost any information management systems. This allowssystem, including those from Documentum, FileNet, IBM, OpenText and SAP. These capabilities allow our customers to deploy and benefit from a single, fully integrated input management solutionplatform as opposed, for example, to multiple separate technologiessystems for document capture, forms processing and systems.electronic data streams.

The Application of Uniform Business Rules to All Sources of Information

 

Our solutions are able to consistently apply a configurable set of business rules to all forms and documents entering the organization throughout the input management process, regardless of their origin or format. This allows organizations to make a one-time investment in developing, testing and deploying these rules, and it allows the forms and documents to be automatically verified and properly routed.

Growth Strategy

 

Our objective is to extend our position as a leading provider of input management software.solutions. Key elements of ourthis strategy to achieve this objective include:

 

Leverage Customers, Resellers, System Integrators and Cooperative Marketing Partners.Our Existing Customer Base

We perceivebelieve significant opportunities exist to leverageexpand the use of our softwaresolutions in our existing customer base and through our resellers, system integrators and cooperative marketing partners. Captiva’s newbase. Our customers generally deploystart by deploying our

software solutions on a departmental basis or for limited form or document types. We believe that satisfactionSatisfaction with these initial deployments can lead to a broader or enterprise-wide adoption of our software. In addition, because many of the leading resellers and system integrators remarket Captiva’s software and because we have cooperative marketing partners who offer synergistic products, we expect to benefit from a multiplier effect as these partners expose our products to their current and prospective customers.solutions.

 

Leverage Professional Services Staff.and Expand Our professional services staff is among the largestSales Channels and most experienced in the input management market. This allows us to respond to the implementation needs of our customers, resellers and system integrators in a timely manner and gives us the ability to manage multiple concurrent deployments while maintaining a strong commitment to quality. The ability to meet customers’ needs enables us to establish strong relationships with these parties.Markets

 

Strengthen Our International Presence.In 2003 we derived 36% of our revenues from resellers, system integrators and distributors. We believe there are significant opportunities to increase sales of our softwaresolutions through resellers, system integrators and servicesdistributors. We also believe there are significant opportunities to both add new cooperative marketing partners and leverage our existing cooperative marketing partners, who typically develop and market complementary products but do not actually resell our products.

We have historically focused our sales and marketing efforts on large organizations, which typically require the ability to process large volumes of forms and documents through scalable input management solutions. Our solutions are, however, flexible enough to serve the full spectrum of market needs, and we intend to expand into lower volume segments by repackaging and repricing our solutions for these segments.In 2003 we released InputAccel Express to specifically address the lower volume market and we announced a distribution agreement for this product with Headway Technology Group, a leading imaging products distributor in international markets.Western Europe. In 20022004 we announced a distribution agreement for this product with Scientific Digital Business Group, a leading imaging products distributor in Southeast Asia.

Expand International Presence

We derived 21%, 25% and 30% of our revenues from outside the United States.States in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. We believe there are significant opportunities to increase sales of our solutions in international markets. We believe the additional size and presence of our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Germany and GermanyAustralia will improve our competitiveness in those countries. In 2003, we initiated efforts to add resellers and system integrators in Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries. In 2004, we initiated similar efforts in the European market, and we will continue to lookPacific Rim. We expect to expand our international presence in otheradditional international markets and to continue to address local language requirements by localizing our products.

Broaden Product Offerings

We intend to continue to develop and introduce new solutions that utilize our proven technologies and allow us to enter new markets. For example, in 2001 we released ClaimPack, in 2003 we introduced InputAccel Express and in 2004 we introduced Digital Mailroom. All of these products build upon our pre-existing technology and have allowed us to enter new markets.

 

Capture a Larger Portion of Customer Dollars Spent.According to IDC, an independent information technology research firm, end-users are willing to pay a single vendor source 10% to 15% more for a complete solution that includes software, hardware and integration services.

services than they would if they obtained these components separately from multiple vendors. We believe that we can extend our position and increase our average selling price by offering a variety of software, services, and hardware, including digital scanners and other third partythird-party products as part of the solutions we provide.

 

Move “down market.”Pursue Strategic Acquisitions    We have historically focused on the “high-end” segment of the input management market, which typically involves larger volumes of forms and documents and more complex processes. Our solutions are, however, scalable and flexible enough to serve the full spectrum of market needs and we intend to expand into the “mid-market” segment by expanding the number of our resellers and system integrators.

 

Leverage Proven Technologies.We believe we extend our presence by developing and introducing products that leverage our proven technology andacquisitions of complementary technologies may allow us to enter new markets. For example,expand our product offerings, augment our distribution channels, expand our market opportunities or broaden our customer base. We have acquired technology in 2001 we introduced our ClaimPack productthe past to achieve these objectives and may in the future evaluate and pursue similar opportunities.

Our Products and Services

Our products and services enable enterprises to manage business critical information from paper, faxed, and electronic forms, documents and transactions. Our solutions automate the processing of medical claimsbillions of forms, documents and 2002 we introduced our InvoicePack product to automate accounts payable departments.transactions annually, converting their contents into information that is usable in database, document, content, and other information management systems.

Software

 

Our Softwarecustomers are usually required to capture large amounts of information within short timeframes in order to meet inflexible deadlines on a regular basis. We have optimized our software products to provide this level of system performance and Servicesavailability. Our software products are generally licensed on either a per server, per user or per concurrent user basis, with the server-based processes typically being configured to support only a specified form or document throughput rate. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, software revenues were approximately 47%, 57% and 68% of our total revenues, respectively.

FormWare

 

FormWare

The FormWare software suite began shipping in 1996 and now providesis comprised of a comprehensive set of fully compatible modules that work in conjunction with one another to capture data from paper, faxed and scanned forms and documents, Internet forms and attachments, electronic data in an EDI or XML format. It is a forms processing platform optimized to extract data from structured forms containing fielded data, such as medical claims, new account enrollments, credit applications, tax returns, orders and similar forms. It includes modules for:

scanning paper forms and documents to create digitized images;
performing image quality assurance functions;
optimizing images for the application of recognition technologies and viewing purposes;
automatically identifying form and document types;
applying optical character recognition (OCR), intelligent character recognition (ICR), barcode, marksense and other recognition technologies to extract data;
manually correcting, in a highly productive manner from images, individual characters or entire fields output by recognition technologies that are considered to be erroneous or suspicious;
manually keying, in a highly productive manner from images, data in order to extract data from fields that can’t be processed using recognition technologies;
applying “check box” or standard as well as custom business rules to validate the accuracy of data;
formatting and exporting data and images to most leading information management systems;
an integrated development environment for setting up applications and writing custom business rules using Microsoft’s Visual Basic for Applications (VBA);
an event and data driven workflow for routing and tracking all data and images; and
system administration.

ClaimPack

Built on FormWare, ClaimPack is an automated medical claims processing solution for the healthcare industry that is able to capture critical information from paper-based claim forms (including HCFA and UB92 forms). It speeds deployment times by providing a standard packaged application while maintaining the ability to customize applications through the use of FormWare’s integrated development environment and VBA.

InputAccel

InputAccelis comprised of a set of modules that work in conjunction with one another to capture content from paper, faxed and scanned forms and documents and electronic data sources. It is a document capture platform optimized to extract content from unstructured documents, such as correspondence, resumes, regulatory filings, litigation materials, drug test reports and similar documents. It includes modules for:

scanning paper forms and documents to create digitized images;
performing image quality assurance functions;
optimizing images for the application of recognition technologies and viewing purposes;
automatically identifying form and document types;
manually keying a limited number of index fields to be used as “meta data” for retrieval purposes;
applying OCR and barcode recognition technologies to extract index fields or full text indexes;
manually correcting individual characters or entire fields output by recognition technologies that are considered to be erroneous or suspicious;
applying “check box” or standard as well as custom business rules to validate the accuracy of index fields;
formatting the index data and exporting it and images to most leading information management systems;
a development environment for setting up applications and writing custom business rules using Visual Basic (VB) Scripting;
an event and data driven workflow for routing and tracking all data and images; and
system administration.

FormWare and InputAccel are fully integrated with one another and can be licensed separately or together.

InputAccel Express

Based on InputAccel, InputAccel Express is a repackaged and repriced version of InputAccel designed for the mid-market segment of the input management market. Completely upgradeable to InputAccel, InputAccel Express is more of a packaged solution for departmental or lower volume users who need to quickly and easily transform paper forms and documents into more usable electronic content.

InputAccel for Invoices

Built on InputAccel, InputAccel for Invoices is a product for accounts payable departments that is designed to capture critical information from invoices. Like ClaimPack, it speeds deployment times by providing a standard packaged application, but can be customized through the use of InputAccel’s development environment and VB Scripting. InputAccel for Invoices was released in the first quarter of 2004.

Digital Mailroom

Also built on InputAccel, Digital Mailroom is a XML format. While it includessolution for the automated classification and routing of digitized images of inbound mail and electronic communications. It provides a single point of entry and centralized processing that is able to automatically recognize and route forms and documents to the appropriate department or person for processing, while providing full auditing and tracking capabilities. Digital Mailroom was released in the first quarter of 2004.

Pixel Products

Pixel software products include:

PixTools, a toolkit for developing highly customized imaging applications by providing the ability to process less structured documents, it is optimizedeasily control scanners, view images, compress and convert the format of images, and read or write files containing images;
ISIS scanner drivers, the “de facto” industry standard scanner drivers for over 250 digital scanner models based on the processing of more structured forms.Image and Scanner Interface Specification (ISIS);
QuickScan Pro, an entry level scanning module with limited capabilities; and
QuickScan, a free scanning module with very limited capabilities currently bundled with several scanners from industry leading manufacturers.

Context Products

 

FormWare isWe acquired the Context products on February 1, 2004 through the acquisition of ADP Context, Inc., a business unit of ADP Claims Solutions Group, Inc. and a part of the worldwide Automatic Data Processing, Inc. family of companies. Context products are sold to providers and payers in the health insurance market and include:

CodeLink, claims coding software that assists providers in the preparation of medical claims and helps ensure their accuracy prior to submission;
Claims Editor, claims editing software for providers to review and optimize medical claims to be submitted in an EDI format prior to submission;
FirstPass, claims editing software that allows payers to preview and accept or reject medical claims submitted in an EDI format; and
approximately 75 knowledge products, which are databases that contain clinical content and information.

Architecture

Our software products are sophisticated 32 bit applicationapplications for use on standalone personal computers and client-server systemsplatforms using Microsoft Windows 98, NT, 2000software at the desktop and XP. FormWare Enterprise Edition is available for implementing mission critical, production level solutionsMicrosoft Server software on client-server platforms. FormWare Desktop Edition provides many of these capabilities in a tightly integrated bundle for less demanding applications on standalone personal computers and small local area networks. Both are available in English, German and Japanese versions, and we may provide additional localized versions as partfile servers. Many of our strategy to increase our international presence and revenues.

Because our customers are regularly required to capture large amounts of information within short timeframes in order to meet inflexible deadlines, we have optimized FormWare to provide this level of system performance and availability. FormWare uses complex queuing algorithms to ensure less than one second response times and minimize the number of system calls required to complete various tasks. Many of FormWare’ssoftware products include modules that function as servers, which means that their resources can be shared by multiple users and that additional modules can be added as required to address more complex processing or greater throughput requirements. In the eventAll of a system failure, the entire FormWare systemour software products use Microsoft SQL Server or a single module can be restarted with no loss of data or significant duplicate processing. Depending upon the FormWare module, this software is licensed on either a per server or per concurrent user basis.highly optimized proprietary file system to maintain higher throughput rates.

 

FormWare includes an open architecture with many application programming interfaces and access to real time event and data level information. These features and FormWare’s modular platform allow our customers, resellers and system integrators to programmatically control processing sequences, supplement our solution with third party software and hardware products, configure systems to meet their unique needs and easily expand systems to meet new requirements.

We also offer two vertical market applications that run on the FormWare platform.ClaimPack automates the processing of medical claims submitted on HCFA 1500 and UB 92 forms, andInvoicePack automates the manual keying of data from invoices by accounts payable staff. The use of these applications can speed deployment times by typically providing 80% or more of the functionality required with the remainder being implemented by our customers, resellers, system integrators or professional services staff.

InputAccel

InputAccel began shipping in November 1995. It offers a comprehensive set of fully compatible modules that work in conjunction with one another to capture data from paper, faxed and scanned forms, documents and attachments and electronic data in a XML format. While it includes the ability to process more structured forms, it is optimized for the processing of less structured documents.

InputAccel is a client server application that utilizes an open architecture and includes a set of software modules designed to automate the conversion and indexing of paper documents into formats compatible with information management systems. The Windows NT-based Enterprise Server is the foundationMost of our InputAccel system. It managessoftware products use complex queuing algorithms to ensure subsecond response times and controls various scanning processes, acting as a work-queue manager, performing automatic workload balancing and collecting performance data thatminimize the number of system managers need to control the processing and insure efficiency and productivity. InputAccel modules plug into the Enterprise Server and perform specific input management tasks such as scanning, image enhancement or data extraction. Many of InputAccel’s modules function as servers, which means that their resources can be shared by multiple users and that additional modules can be added ascalls required to address more complex processing or greater throughput requirements. Ascomplete various taskstasks. All of our software products are completed the Enterprise Server provides the connectivity between paper and digital formats by delivering data and images to information management systems.

InputAccel is only available in English, but we mayEnglish; some are available in localized German, Spanish, Portuguese and Japanese versions. We expect to provide additional localized versions as part of our strategyin order to increase our international presence and revenues. Depending upon the client server module, this software is licensed on either a per server, per transaction or per concurrent user basis. In addition to our InputAccel modules, over a dozen third-party technology developers offer InputAccel-compatible modules worldwide. These technology developers help make InputAccel a standard platform for building information capture solutions and give customers the flexibility they need. These third-party relationships also help extend our reach to market segments requiring specialized functionality.

 

ISIS & Pix ToolsAdvantEDGE Services

 

Created in 1990, our Image and Scanner Interface Specification (ISIS) is a flexible, modular software standard for acquiring, converting, viewing, printing and storing scanned document and form images. By creating

applications using ISIS-based software toolkits, resellers, system integrators and third party software vendors can support over 250 devices through ISIS scanner drivers. As new devices and their corresponding ISIS drivers are made available, ISIS-based applications automatically inherit support for these drivers. The ISIS interface bridges the gap between scanner and other vendors making ISIS thede facto industry standard. Because ISIS is the basis of an industry standard (ANSI/AIIM MS61-1996), ISIS users can be confident that the hardware they have purchased will be supported byWe offer a variety of applications, and that their imaging applications will support a wide variety of scanners.

Our PixTools software toolkits provide users the most efficient means possible for adding ISIS-based imaging functions to software applications and are designed to enable software application developers to write custom, commercial-level document imaging applications. They save developers both time and money by reducing time to market, lowering application support costs, and lowering research and development costs. It is a collection of software modules, each of which performs a specific imaging related function. PixTools modules are available to control scanners, assist in the viewing of images, compress and convert the format of image data, and read or write files containing image data. PixTools modules communicate with one another using messages that carry information in “tags” and “choices”. The modules are linked together into “pipes” to perform specific imaging functions. PixTools is only available in English, but we may provide localized versions as part ofservices through our strategy to increase our international presence and revenues. This software is usually licensed on per toolkit user basis with an additional royalty being payable for each resulting end user of the application developed.

Professional Services

Our AdvantEDGE services programprogram. We believe that this allows us to better address the implementation and support needs of our customers, resellers and system integrators and achieve a greater level of customer satisfaction. This program includes a comprehensivebroad range of services provided by our professional and technical services staff, which consisted of 7669 employees as of December 31, 2002.2003. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, services revenues were approximately 40%, 40% and 32% of our total revenues, respectively.

 

Our professional services staff provides project management, functional and detailed specification preparation, application development, form redesign, system configuration, quality assurance,testing, installation and application specific training services to our customers. While our resellers and system integrators can and do provide these services to their customers, they often alsofrequently ask us to provide these services to their customers on a subcontract basis. We generally chargescharge for professional services on a fixed fee basis for projects utilizing mutually agreed upon functional and detailed specifications and on a time and materials basis for other projects.

Our technical services staff provides maintenance for the dependable and timely resolution of technical inquiries by telephone, email and over the Internet, and a set of regularly scheduled training classes usually held at our offices in San Diego, California, San Jose, California and Waltham, Massachusetts.customer sites. We offer several levels of these technical services,maintenance, with the most comprehensive option covering 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We generally charge for customer support based uponmaintenance as a percentage of the related software license feesfee that varies, depending upon the related level of service and other factors, and classroom training on a per attendee basis.

 

Hardware and Other Products

As part of our solutions, we offer digital scanners and other third-party products. In 2003 these accounted for approximately 13% of our total revenues, with substantially all of these amounts being attributable to the sale of sophisticated, production level digital scanners manufactured by Kodak and IBML. We had a backlog of digital scanner revenues of approximately $4.3 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Our Customers

 

As of December 31, 20022003 we had licensed our software to over 1,0002,000 customers. Our software issolutions are designed to address theinput management needs ofin a broad range of businesses,industries, including those in the insurance, financial services, banking, technology, government, business process outsourcing, retailBPO, and other markets. The following is a partial list of our customers that have licensedand are representative of our software:overall customer base:

 

Insurance


 

Government


Allianz

Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina

Blue Cross Blue Shield of CaliforniaOklahoma

Cigna

Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield

First Health

Fortis Health

GEICO

Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield

HumanaMetropolitan Life

Marsh USA

Medical Mutual

Metropolitan Life

Premera

Prudential

Wisconsin Physicians ServiceServices

 

State of California, Franchise Tax Board

State of Florida, Departments of Revenue and Labor

State of Indiana, Departments of Revenue and Transportation

State of Kansas, Department of Revenue

State of Michigan, Department of Community Health

State of Minnesota, Department of Revenue

State of New Jersey, Department of Revenue

State of Pennsylvania, Department of Revenue &and Office of the Attorney General

Texas Workforce Commission

U.S. Bureau of the Census

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Labor

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

U.S. Office of Personnel Management

Financial Services


 

Business Process OutsourcingBPO


AIM FundsABN Amro

ConsorsAmerican Express

Discover Financial Services

Fidelity Investments

GMAC Financial Services

PrimericaNational City Corporation

Postbank Systems

Putnam Investments

Siemens Business Services

Vanguard Group

Wachovia Bank

 

ADP

Cendris

Diversified Information Technologies

LasonElectronic Data Systems

SourcecorpImaging Acceptance Corporation

SOURCECORP

Banking


 

RetailOther


Bank of America

Amgen

Bank of New York

Bank One

Chase Manhattan

Citicorp

Deutsche Postbank

 

DillardsCleary Gottlieb

Express Scripts

Home Depot

Intracorp

JD Power and Associates

Jostens

Lands’ EndKable News

Victoria’s SecretMerck

Pfizer

PixTools CustomersTechnology


 

Other


Bell & Howell

Canon

Cardiff Software

Kofax (a Dicom Group (Kofax)company)

FileNet

Fujitsu

Hewlett-PackardHP

Hummingbird

IBM

Kodak

Readsoft

Ricoh

Siemens Business Services

 

Amgen

Amtrak

Delta Airlines

Greyhound

JD Power and Associates

Kable News

Merck

Monsanto

Pfizer

Searle

 

For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000In 2003, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues.

 

Sales, Marketing &and Business Development

 

We sell input management software and servicesreach our customers through our direct sales staff, often in conjunction withforce, our cooperative marketing partners. Approximately 29%partners and a network of our sales are made through resellers, and system integrators and the remainder comes fromdistributors, collectively “channels”. Our cooperative marketing partners typically develop and market complementary products, and we jointly sell directly to end-user customers. We have established relationships with resellers, system integrators and distributors that deliver our direct sales staff.solutions to multiple markets. We believe our ability to successfully work with and through these diverse and sometimes competing channels represents a significant competitive advantage. As of December 31, 2002,These channels currently offer our sales, marketingsolutions in the United States, Western Europe, the Pacific Rim and business development staff consisted of 95 employeesSpanish and we had over 100Portuguese speaking countries.

Our resellers, system integrators and distributors include American Management Systems, Crowe Chizek, Documentum (an EMC company), DST Technologies, EDS, Headway Technology Group (an Acal company), IBM Deutschland, IKON Image Systems Solutions, ImageScan, Integrated Document Technologies, Nissho Electronics Corporation, Open Text and Unisys. Our cooperative marketing partners. We intend to expand our salespartners include Eastman Kodak, FileNet, Fujitsu, Hyland Software, IBM, IBML, Information Management Resources (IMR), Interwoven and marketing staff and activities and to increase the number of our resellers, system integrators and strategic marketing partners.SAP.

 

Our salesmarketing strategy involves targeting organizations with forms or document capture needs that either already recognize or can be educated about their input management problems. Because our software can increase an organization’s revenue, reduce its expenses and improve its relationships with customers, suppliers and employees, we direct our selling efforts to senior management, including executives responsible for input management functions as well as chief information and chief financial officers at prospective customers. We explain the benefits of our software, assess the specific needs of the organizations, create demonstrations and provide proposals, including return on investment analyses, to satisfy the prospective customer’s requirements. The sales cycle typically ranges from 60 to 180 days.

We useuses a variety of marketing programs to build awareness of input management problems, our solutions and our software and brand name,name. We use a broad mix of programs to accomplish these goals, including market research, product and strategy updates with industry analysts, public relations activities, direct mail and relationship marketing programs, seminars, advertising, trade shows, speaking engagements and Internet siteInternet-based marketing. OurTo support our selling efforts, our marketing staff also produces collateral materials to support sales to prospective customers that includesuch as brochures, data sheets, white papers, customer success stories, presentations and demonstrations.

Our

As of December 31, 2003, our sales, marketing and business development staff consisted of 97 employees. In 2003 approximately 36% of our total revenues came from resellers, and system integrators include American Management Systems, BancTec, Documentum, DST, EDS, IBM Global Services, Xerox, Lockheed Martin, Logicon (a Northrop Grumman company), Nissho Electronics Corporation, PFPC (PNC’s mutual fund servicing subsidiary) and Unisys.

In the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000distributors, but none of our resellers or system integratorsthese parties accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues.

 

We believeintend to aggressively expand our sales and marketing activities, increase the number of our resellers, system integrators, distributors and cooperative marketing partners who offer synergistic products are important in selling and marketing our solution. We benefit from a multiplier effect asdevote significant resources to accomplishing these partners expose Captiva’s products to more of their customers and prospects. As a result, we have developed such arrangements with numerous cooperative marketing partners, including Eastman Kodak, FileNET, IBM, IBML, Information Management Resources, Interwoven, Open Text, Optika and Legato.

Our Pixel software tools are generally sold or licensed on a royalty basis through a direct sales program to hardware and software suppliers such as Fujitsu, Canon, IBM and FileNet.objectives.

 

Research and Development

 

We believe that our future success will dependdepends in large part on our ability to enhance our current product line,products, develop new products, maintain technological competitiveness, implement emerging standards and satisfy an evolving range of customer requirements. requirements for existing and new input management problems. Our research and development employees are responsible for achieving these objectives, and we have and intend to continue to devote substantial resources to these efforts.

We have assembled a team of skilled software developers and softwaredevelopment, quality assurance and documentation engineers with substantial industry experience and believe they represent a significant industry experience.competitive advantage. This development group is responsible for exploring new directions and applications of core technologies, incorporating new technologies into products and maintaining strong research relationships withteam includes many individuals who have previously worked together in other software developers. We seek to build upon our direct investment inorganizations where they developed alternative input management products.

Our research and development by supporting efforts by independent software vendors to develop complementary productsexpenditures were approximately $9.0 million, $5.9 million and participate actively$4.9 million in the2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. As of December 31, 2003, our research and development staff consisted of industry standards.

Technical Support65 employees. All research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred.

 

An important element in our strategy is to provide comprehensive support of our products. We believe that responsive technical support is essential to satisfy customer requirements. Our support activities provide telephone support via a help desk, e-mail support and remote support that provide direct access from our support staff to our customers’ systems for problem diagnosis and resolution. We also provide support through our Web site, which offers technical information designed to assist in answering frequently asked questions and in problem diagnosis and resolution. Customers are required to buy an annual maintenance contract when they initially license our software and most renew this contract on an annual basis. Additionally, we provide a variety of training and professional consulting services to many of our customers, which assist them to more efficiently implement their systems.

We typically provide a ninety-day warranty program on all our products. Our standard terms and conditions provide that a customer may return a defective product for repair or replacement during the warranty period.

Intellectual Property

 

We have invested and will continue to invest significantly in the development of proprietary technology forand information, and we believe our productssuccess and ability to compete is dependent on our operations frequently incorporate proprietary and confidential information.ability to protect this intellectual property. We rely uponon a combination of copyright andpatent, trademark, laws and non-disclosure and other intellectual property contractual arrangements to protect our proprietary rights. We protect our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws which only provide limited protection. We hold one patent and currently have no patent applications pending. We also enter into confidentiality, or license agreements with our employees, consultantsnon-disclosure and corporate partners and control accessother contractual arrangements to and distributionprotect these rights.

Our customers’ use of our software documentation and other proprietary information.

Use by customers of our softwareproducts is governed by shrink-wrap or executed license agreements. We also enter into written agreements with each of our resellers, and system integrators forand distributors governing the distributionlicensing of our software.software products. In addition, we seek to avoid disclosure of our proprietary technology and information by requiring each of our employees and others with access to our intellectual property to execute confidentiality and/or non-disclosure agreements with us. We protect our software products, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws. All of these measures afford only limited protection.

 

Competition

 

The market for our products is highly competitive, evolving and subject to rapid technological change. We believe that the principal competitive factors in the input management market are:

 

solution performance, features, functionality and reliability;

ability to provide professional services;services and other components required to form a more complete solution;

price/price and performance characteristics;

timeliness of new software product introductions with minimal fixes;

adoptionand quality of emerging standards;the same;

size of a vendor’s existing customer base;
access to prospective customers;
brand name;

access to customers; and

the financial stability of the vendor.vendor; and
adoption of emerging standards.

 

We believe that we compare favorably with our competitors with respect to each of the above factors.

 

Our principal competitors are:

 

companies addressing segments of the input management market, including Adobe, Anydoc, Cardiff, Software, OCE OD,ODT, Dakota Imaging, Datacap, Easy Software, FileNet, Improx (an Isis Holding AG company), IteSoft, Kleindienst,FileNET, Kofax (a Dicom Group company), Microsoft, Microsystems Technology, Mitek Systems, PureEdge,IRIS, ReadSoft, Recognition Research, Shana, Scan-Optics Top Image Systems and others;

electronic data interchangeEDI and e-commerce software vendors; and

in-house development efforts by our customers, prospective customers, resellers and system integrators.

 

We expect additional competition from other established and emerging companies if the market continues to develop and expand. Many of these competitors and potential competitors may have significant competitive advantages, including greater name recognition; more resources to apply to the development, marketing and sales of their products and more established sales channels. In addition, many of our competitors have well-established relationships with our current and potential customers and have extensive knowledge of our industry. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can. In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to address customer needs. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. We also expect that competition will increase as a result of software industry consolidations.

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2002,2003, we had 271266 employees. We employ 175 peopleThis included 97 employees in sales, marketing sales, services,and business development; 69 employees in professional and technical support; 60services; 65 employees in engineeringresearch and product developmentdevelopment; and 3635 employees in finance and administration. NoneOur acquisition of theContext on February 1, 2004 added 34 employees. Our employees are not represented by a labor union or are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Weagreement, and we believe that our employee relations are good.

 

Risk Factors

 

You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Risks and uncertainties, in addition to those we describe below, that are not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business could be harmed, the price of our common stock could decline and you maycould lose all or part of your investment.

 

The merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva could harm key third party relationships.

The merger may harm our relationship with third parties with whom ActionPoint and Old Captiva had relationships prior to the merger. Uncertainties following the merger may cause these parties to discontinue or modify these relationships. Any changes in these relationships could harm our business. In addition, customers of Old Captiva and ActionPoint and other third parties may, in response to the merger, delay or defer decisions concerning whether to utilize our services and products. We could experience a decrease in expected revenue as a consequence of uncertainties associated with the merger. Any delay or deferral in those decisions by customers of Old Captiva and ActionPoint or other third parties could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Because of the unpredictability and variability of revenues from our products, we may not accurately forecast revenues or match expenses to revenues, which could harm quarterly operating results and cause volatility or declines in our stock price.

 

Both ActionPoint’s and Old Captiva’sOur quarterly revenues, expenses and operating results have varied significantly in the past, and our quarterly revenues, expenses and operating results are likelymay fluctuate significantly from period to vary significantlyperiod in the future due to a variety of factors, including:

fluctuations in the size and timing of significant orders;

possible delays in recognizing software licensing revenues;

the trend within the software industry forfact that a large portion of our orders to beare generally booked late in a given calendareach quarter;

uncertainty in the budgeting cycles of customers; and

the timing of introduction of new or enhanced products.products; and
general economic and political conditions.

We believe that comparisons of quarterly operating results will not necessarily be meaningful and should not be relied upon as the sole measure of our future performance. In addition, we may from time to time provide estimates of our future performance. For example, we typically estimate that the first quarter of each year is our weakest quarter and the fourth quarter of each year is our strongest quarter. Estimates are inherently uncertain and actual results are likely to deviate, perhaps substantially, from our estimates as a result of the many risks and uncertainties in our business, including, but not limited to, those set forth in these risk factors. We undertake no duty to update estimates if given. Our operating results in one or more future quarters may fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If this occurs, the trading price of our stock could decline significantly.

If we fail to rapidly reduce expenses in the event our revenues unexpectedly decline, our results may be harmed.

 

We currently operate with virtually no software order backlog because software products are shipped shortly after orders are received. This fact makes software revenues in any quarter substantially dependent on orders booked and shipped throughout that quarter. In addition, a large portion of our orders are generally booked late in each quarter and we obtain a significant portion of our revenues from indirect sales channels over which we have little control. Moreover, expenseThe combination of these factors makes our revenues difficult to predict from period to period. Expense levels are based to a significant extent on expectations of future revenues and therefore are relatively fixed in the short term. IfIn particular, we increased hiring and product development expenses in the fourth quarter of 2003 in anticipation of an improving economic environment. We expect to continue these higher levels of expenses and, if revenue levels are below expectations, our operating results are likely to be harmed because only small portions of our expenses vary directly with revenues.

 

We have a long sales cycle and our solutions require a sophisticated sales effort.

Given the high average selling price and the cost and time to implement our solutions, a customer’s decision to license our products typically involves a significant commitment of resources and is influenced by the customer’s budget cycles and internal approval procedures for IT purchases. In addition, selling our solutions requires us to educate potential customers on our solutions’ uses and benefits. As a result, of these factors,our solutions have a long sales cycle, which can take from three to six months or more. Consequently, we believe that revenues, expenses and operating results are likelyface difficulty predicting the quarter in which sales to vary significantly between quarters in the future and comparisons of operating results from period-to-period will not necessarily be meaningful. As such, these comparisons should not be relied upon as the sole measureexpected customers may occur. The sale of our future performance. Our operating results in one or more future quarters may failsolutions is also subject to meetdelays from the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If this occurs, we could experience an immediatelengthy budgeting, approval and significant decline in the trading pricecompetitive evaluation processes of our stock.customers that typically accompany significant capital expenditures.

Our solutions require a sophisticated sales effort targeted at senior management of our prospective customers. New hires in our sales department require extensive training and typically take at least six months to achieve full productivity. There is no assurance that new sales representatives will ultimately become productive. If we were to lose qualified and productive sales personnel, our revenues could be adversely impacted.

 

The loss of key employees pursuant to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva may prevent us from achieving the anticipated benefits of the merger.

The merger of ActionPoint and Captiva has been and will continue to be followed by a period of integration and transition. This process may result in the loss of key employees. The loss of key employees could make it significantly more difficult to manage the critical functions of these two businesses and impair our ability to compete effectively against other input management software providers.

As a result of the merger, James Vickers, David Sharp and Matthew Albanese, the former executive officers of ActionPoint, may be entitled to significant severance benefits if they resign or if their employment is terminated under certain circumstances after the merger. The former executive officers may be entitled to resign and collect severance payments if they have suffered a material reduction in their authority or responsibility. In addition, Reynolds Bish, Rick Russo, Steven Burton and Blaine Owens are employees at will and may terminate their employment at any time.

Charges against earnings related to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva have reduced and may continue to reduce our earnings, if any, during the post-merger integration period.

We have incurred direct transaction costs of approximately $1.7 million, including legal, accounting and financial advisory fees. In addition, we incurred integration costs associated with the merger of $2.1 million, including the payment of employee severance benefits, which are expected to be nonrecurring and have been charged to operations in the third quarter of 2002, thereby increasing expenses for the quarter. We may incur additional merger-related integration costs.

Accounting charges resulting from the merger will continue to have a negative effect on earnings over future quarters.

The merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva has resulted in approximately $13 million of goodwill and other intangible assets being recorded on the books of the combined company. Of this amount, up to approximately $6 million will be amortized as part of our cost of revenues over the next five years. These non-cash charges will negatively affect earnings during the amortization period, which could have a negative effect on our stock price.

If we cannot successfully integrate existing business operations of ActionPoint and Old Captiva, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva.

Integrating the business of Old Captiva and ActionPoint involves a number of risks, including:

the difficulties of the potential introduction of new or enhanced products;

the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing operations;

the difficulties and expenses in combining the operations, technology and systems of the two companies;

the difficulties in integrating the two companies’ key revenue-generating products and/or services in a way that would be accepted in the market;

the difficulties in the creation and maintenance of uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies;

the different geographic locations of the principal operations of ActionPoint and Old Captiva; and

the challenges in keeping and attracting customers.

In the past, as a private company Old Captiva was not subject to rigorous public disclosure and reporting obligations. Further, the process of combining the two companies could create uncertainty among employees about their future roles with us, thereby negatively affecting employee morale. This uncertainty may adversely affect the ability of the combined company to retain some of our key employees after the merger.

If we are to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger, the operations of Old Captiva and ActionPoint must be integrated and combined efficiently and effectively. There can be no assurance that the integration will be successful, or that the anticipated benefits of the merger will be realized.

ActionPoint and Old Captiva incurred losses in the past and we may incur losses in the future.

ActionPoint incurred losses of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, and Old Captiva incurred losses of $0.4 million for the same period. Even if we maintain profitability, given the competitive and evolving nature of the industry in which we operate, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. We will need to generate higher revenues while containing costs and operating expenses to become and remain profitable. Failure to do so may cause our stock price to decline.

We may not be able to compete successfully against current and potential competitors.

 

The input management software industry is currently fragmented, with no one company having a significant market share. We believeexpect that competition in the input management software industry maywill intensify in the future. The market for forms processing and document capture solutions is very competitive and subject to rapid change. In addition, because there are relatively low barriers to entry into the software market, we may encounter additional competition from both established and emerging companies. Our current competitors could be acquired by larger companies and could become more formidable competitors. Many potential competitors have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than ours, in addition to significantly greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers. As a result, these potential competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of competitive products than we can. There is also a substantial risk that announcements of competing products by potential competitors could result in the delay or postponement of customer orders in anticipation of the introduction of the competitors’ new products.

 

In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to address customer needs. These cooperative relationships may limit our ability to sell our products through particular reseller partners. Accordingly, new competitors or competitive cooperative relationships may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share. We also expectContributing to these challenges, our industry is subject to consolidation, which could subject us to competition with larger companies offering integrated solutions and a wider breadth of products. Potential competitors may bundle their products or incorporate additional components into existing products in a manner that discourages users from purchasing our products.

Increased competition will increase as a result of software industry consolidation. Increased competitionany combination of the above factors is likely to result in price reductions, fewer customer orders, reduced margins and loss of market share, any of which could harm our revenues, business and operating results.

 

We have incurred losses in the past and we may incur losses in the future.

We have only recently become profitable with net income of $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. We incurred a net loss of $0.5 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Given the competitive and evolving nature of the industry in which we operate, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis, which would likely cause our stock price to decline.

If the market for input management software does not grow, our revenues may not grow.

 

The market for input management software is fragmented and extremely competitive.competitive and in recent years has had limited, if any, growth. In addition, the concept of input management software is not widely understood in the marketplace. We have spent, and intend to continue to spend, considerable resources educating potential customers about our software products

and the input management market in general. These expenditures may fail to achieve any broadening of the market or additional degree of market acceptance for our products. The rate at which organizations have adopted ActionPoint and Old Captivaour products has varied significantly in the past, and we expect to continue to experience such variations in the future. If the market for input management products grows more slowly than we anticipate or not at all, our revenues will not grow and our operating results will suffer.

 

We currently depend on repeat business for a substantial portion of our revenues, and need to increase our customer base to grow in the future.

Currently, a significant and increasing portion of our revenues is generated from existing customers. Many of our customers initially make a limited purchase of our products and services on a departmental basis or for limited form or document types. These customers may not choose to purchase additional licenses to expand their use of our products. If this occurs, or if existing customers fail to renew services or maintenance contracts, then new customer revenue may not be sufficient to offset this and enable us to sustain our current revenue levels.

Conversely, a significant factor in our ability to grow our revenues in the future is our ability to expand our customer base. We believe our ability to grow depends in part on our ability to expand into the “mid-market” segment of the input management market. Some of our competitors are more established in this segment of the market, and price is a more significant factor in the mid-market segment than the ability of our products to handle large volumes of documents. We have recently released products that address this market segment, and it is uncertain whether and to what extent these products will be successful and to what extent price-driven competition will erode our margins. If we are unsuccessful in expanding into the mid-market segment, or otherwise fail to increase our customer base, our business and operating results would be harmed.

If we are unable to respond in an effective and timely manner to technological change and new products in the industry, our revenues and operating results will suffer.

 

We currently expect to release a number of new products and enhancements to existing products in 2004 and anticipate that a substantial portion of our product revenue growth will come from these new releases. If we faceexperience material delays in introducing new services, products and enhancements, our customers may forego the use of our products and services and use those of our competitors. The market for input management is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, uncertain product life cycles, changes in customer demands and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. Our future success will depend upon our ability to continue to enhance our current products while developing and introducing new products on a timely basis that keep pace with technological developments and satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements. As a result of the complexities inherent in our software,

new products and product enhancements can require long development and testing periods. Significant delays in the general availability of suchthese new releases or significant problems in the installation or implementation of suchthese new releases could harm our operating results and financial condition. Both ActionPoint and Old CaptivaWe have experienced delays in the past in the release of new products and new product enhancements. We may fail to develop and market on a timely and cost effective basis new products or new product enhancements that respond to technological change, evolving industry standards or customer requirements. We may also experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction or marketing of our products or reduce the likelihood that our new products and product enhancements will achieve market acceptance. Any such failures or difficulties would harm our business and operating results.

 

We may not be successful in expanding into new vertical markets.

One element of our strategy involves applying our technology in new applications for new vertical markets. To be successful in expanding our sales in new vertical markets, we will need to develop additional expertise in these markets. We may be required to hire new employees with expertise in new target markets in order to compete effectively in those markets. If we are not successful in growing our sales in other vertical markets, we may not achieve desired sales growth.

We could be subject to potential product liability claims and third-party litigation related to our products and services, and as a result our operating results might suffer.

Our products are used in connection with critical business functions and may result in significant liability claims if they do not work properly. Limitation of liability provisions included in our license agreements may not sufficiently protect us from product liability claims because of limitations in existing or future laws or unfavorable judicial decisions. Although we have not experienced any material product liability claims in the past, the sale and support of our products may give rise to claims in the future that may be substantial in light of the use of those products in business-critical applications. Liability claims could require expenditure of significant time and money in litigation or payment of significant damages.

Software defects that are discovered in our products could also damage our reputation, causing a loss of customers and resulting in significant costs and liabilities.costs.

 

Our software products are complex and may contain errors or defects, particularly when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are released. In the past, both ActionPoint and Old Captivawe have discovered software errors in certain of their products after they were released to the market. In addition, our products are combined with complex products developed by other vendors. As a result, should problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source or sources of the problems. Defects and errors, or end-user perception of defects and errors, found in current versions, new versions or enhancements of these products after commencement of commercial shipments may result in:

 

loss of customers;

warranty claims;
damage to brand reputation;

delay in market acceptance of current and future products; and

diversion of development and engineering resources; and

legal actions by customers.resources.

 

The occurrence of any one or more of these factors could harm our operating results and financial condition.

 

If we cannot manage and expand international operations or respond to changing regulatory conditions in international markets, our revenues may not increase and our business and results of operations wouldcould be harmed.

 

In 2002, ourWe currently have international operations, including offices in the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. For the year ended December 31, 2003, international sales represented approximately 25%21% of our revenues. We anticipate that our international sales will increase as a percentage of our revenues, and that for the foreseeable

future, a significant portion of our revenues will be derived from sources outside the United States. We

intend to continue to expand sales and support operations internationally. In order to successfullyWe could enter additional international markets which would require significant management time and financial resources which could adversely affect our operating margins and earnings. To expand international sales, we may establish additional foreigninternational operations, expand international sales channel management and support organizations, hire additional personnel, customize our products for local markets, recruit additional international resellers and attempt to increase the productivity of existing international resellers. If we are unable to do any of the foregoing in a timely and cost-effective manner, our sales growth internationally, if any, will be limited, and our business, operating results and financial condition wouldmay be harmed. Even if we are able to successfully expand international operations successfully, we may not be able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products. Our international operations are generally subject to a number of risks, including:

 

costs of and other difficulties in customizing products for foreign countries;

costs and challenges of educating customers and developing brand awareness in new local markets;
protectionist laws and business practices favoring local competition;

greater seasonal reductions in business activity;
greater difficulty or delay in accounts receivable collection;

difficulties in staffing and managing international operations and in establishing and managing sales channels;
foreign operations;and United States taxation issues;

regulatory uncertainties in international countries;
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; and

political and economic instability.

 

The majority of ActionPoint’s and Old Captiva’s historicalour international revenues and costs have been denominated in United States dollars. However, we expect that in the future an increasing portion of revenues and costs could beare denominated in foreign currencies. Although we do not currently undertake foreign exchange hedging transactions to reduce foreign currency transaction exposure, we may do so in the future. However, we do not have any plans to eliminate all foreign currency transaction exposure. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and other risks associated with international operations could increase our costs which, in turn, could harm our business. If we are unable to expand and manage our international operations effectively, our business may be harmed.

 

Failure to further develop and sustain our indirect sales channel could limit or prevent future growth.

Our strategy for future growth depends in part on our ability to increase sales through our indirect sales channel. We have a limited number of distribution relationships for our products with systems integrators and other resellers, and we may not be able to maintain our existing relationships or form new relationships. Competitors may have existing relationships with these parties that may make it difficult for us to form new relationships in some cases. If our indirect sales channel does not continue to grow, our ability to generate revenues may be harmed.

Our current agreements with our distribution partners typically do not prevent these companies from selling products of other companies (including products that may compete with our products), and they do not generally require these companies to purchase minimum quantities of our products. Some of these relationships are governed by agreements that can be terminated by either party with little or no prior notice. These distributors could give higher priority to the products of other companies or to their own products than they give to our products. The loss of, or significant reduction in, sales volume from any of our current or future distribution partners as a result of any of these or other factors could harm our revenues and operating results.

Our future success is dependent on the services of our key management, sales and marketing, professional services, technical support and research and development personnel, and those persons’whose knowledge of our business and technical expertise would be difficult to replace.

 

Our products and technologies are complex, and we are substantially dependent upon the continued service of existing key management, sales and marketing, professional services, technical support and research and

development personnel. All of these key employees are employees “at will” and can resign at any time. Moreover, some of these key employees may be entitled to receive severance benefits upon their termination or resignation. Mergers like that of ActionPoint and Old Captiva are followed by a period of transition that often results in changes in key employees. The loss of the services of one or more of these key employees could harm our business and slow product development processes or sales and marketing efforts.efforts or otherwise harm our business.

A significant aspect of our ability to attract and retain highly qualified employees is the equity compensation that we offer, typically in the form of stock options. Bills are currently pending before Congress, and the Financial Accounting Standards Board is expected to propose standards, that would require companies to include compensation expense in their statement of operations relating to the issuance of employee stock options. As a result, we may decide to issue fewer stock options and may be impaired in our efforts to attract and retain necessary personnel.

 

If we fail to recruit and retain a significant number of qualified technical personnel, we may not be able to develop, introduce or enhance products on a timely basis.

 

We require the services of a substantial number of qualified professional services, technical support and research and development personnel. The market for these highly skilled employees is characterized by intense competition, which is heightened by their high level of mobility. These factors make it particularly difficult to attract and retain the qualified technical personnel required. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate technical qualifications.

If we are unable to recruit and retain a sufficient number of technical personnel with the skills required for existing and future products, we may not be able to complete development of, or upgrade or enhance, our products in a timely manner. Even if we are able to expand our staff of qualified technical personnel, they may require greater than expected compensation packages whichthat would increase operating expenses.

 

We could be subjectIf we are unable to potential product liability claims and third party litigation related toprotect our products and services, and as a resultintellectual property, our reputation and operating results may suffer.

Our products are used in connection with critical business functions and may result in significant liability claims if they do not work properly. Limitation of liability provisions included in our license agreements may not sufficiently protect us from product liability claims because of limitations in existing or future laws or unfavorable judicial decisions. Although neither ActionPoint nor Old Captiva experienced any material product liability claims in the past, the sale and support of our products may give rise to claims in the future which may be substantial in light of the use of those products in business-critical applications. Liability claims could require expenditure of significant time and money in litigation or payment of significant damages. Any claims for damages, whether or not successful, could seriously damage our reputation and business.harmed.

 

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology. Monitoring unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology, particularly in foreigninternational countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. In particular, we could begin performing significant research and development outside of the United States, where intellectual property protection could be less stringent than in the United States. In addition, our competitors might independently develop similar technology, or duplicate our productproducts or circumvent any patents or our other intellectual property rights.rights we may have. Due to rapid technological change in our market, we believe the various legal protections available for our intellectual property are of limited value. Instead, we seek to establish and maintain a technology leadership position by leveraging technological and creative skills of our personnel, new product developments and enhancements to existing products.

 

Substantial litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in the software industry. To date we have been notified that our technologies infringe the proprietary rights of two other parties and have settled such claims on terms we consider to be favorable. There can be no assurance that others will not claim that we have infringed proprietary rights relating to past, current or future software or technologies. We could become subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our competitors grows and as our software overlaps with competitive offerings. These claims, even if meritless, could be expensive, time-consuming to defend, divert our attention from the operation of our business and cause software shipment delays. If we infringe another party’s intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay a substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the software that contains the infringing intellectual property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing technology or to obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

We license some technologies from third parties. Although these licenses include indemnifications, there can be no assurance that these technology licenses will not infringe the proprietary rights of others.

We depend upon software that we license from and products provided by third parties, the loss of which could harm our revenues.

 

We rely upon certain software licensed from third parties, including software that is integrated with our internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions. There can be no assurance that these third-party softwaretechnology licenses will not infringe the proprietary rights of others or will continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The loss of or inability to maintain any such software licenses could result in shipment delays or reductions until equivalent software could be developed, identified, licensed and integrated. Such delays wouldDelays of this type could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

In addition, we have recently derived a significant portion of our revenues from reselling third-party products, primarily digital scanners. These third-party products may not continue to meet industry standards or be available to us at all or on commercially reasonable terms, in which case our operating results and financial condition would be harmed. In addition, we have little control over the quality of these third-party products other than our decisions as to which products to resell.

If we wereare subject to a protracted infringement claim or one withthat we infringe a significant damage award,third-party’s intellectual property, our operating results wouldcould suffer.

 

Substantial litigation regarding intellectual property rights and brand names exists in the software industry. We expect that software product developers increasingly will be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in this industry segment grows and the functionality of products in differentrelated industry segments overlaps. We are not aware that any of our products infringe any proprietary rights of third parties.

However, third parties, some with far greater financial resources than ours, may claim infringement of their intellectual property rights by our products. products, both those developed by us and obtained through the acquisition of other businesses.

Any such claims, with or without merit, could:

 

be time consuming to defend;

result in costly litigation;

divert management’s attention and resources;

cause product shipment delays; or

require us to redesign products;
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements.agreements; or
cause others to seek indemnity from us.

 

If we are required to enter into royalty or licensing agreements to resolve an infringement claim, we may not be able to enter into those agreements on favorable terms. A successful claim of product infringement against us, or failure or inability to either license the infringed or similar technology or develop alternative technology on a timely basis, could harm our operating results, financial condition or liquidity.

 

To manage our expected growth and expansion,If we needare unable to continue to improveimplement and implementimprove financial and managerial controls and continue to improve our reporting systems and procedures. If we are unable to do so successfully,procedures, we may not be able to manage growth effectively and our operating results may be harmed.

 

Our expected growthGrowth will place a significant strain on our management, information systems and resources. In order to manage this growth effectively, we will need to continue to improve our financial and managerial controls and our reporting systems and procedures. Any inability of our management to integrate employees, products, technology advances and customer service into operations and to eliminate unnecessary duplication may have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations, Nasdaq Stock Market rules, and new accounting pronouncements are creating uncertainty and additional complexities for companies such as ours. To maintain high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure, we intend to invest all reasonable necessary resources to comply with evolving standards. This investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from strategic revenue generating and cost management activities.

If we are unable to build awareness of our brand,brands, we may not be able to compete effectively against competitors with greater name recognition and our sales could be adversely affected.

 

If we are unable to economically achieve orand maintain a leading position in input management software or to promote and maintain our brands, our business, results of operations and financial condition could suffer. Development and awareness of our brands will depend largely on our success in increasing our customer base. In order to attract and retain customers and to promote and maintain our brands in response to competitive pressures, we may be required to increase our marketing and advertising budget or otherwise increase our sales expenses. There can be no assurance that our efforts will be sufficient or that we will be successful in attracting and retaining customers or promoting our brands. Failure in this regard could harm our business and results.

Most of our revenues are currently derived from sales and service of three software products.product lines. If demand for these products declines or fails to grow as expected, our revenues will be harmed.

 

Historically, ActionPointwe have derived substantially all of itsour revenues from the InputAccel productFormWare, InputAccel and PixTools software, and substantially all of Old Captiva’s revenues were generated from the FormWare product.product lines. Our future operating results continue towill depend heavily upon continued and widespread market acceptance for the InputAccel,FormWare, InputAccel and PixTools and FormWare productsproduct lines and enhancements to those products. A decline in the demand for any of these products as a result of competition, technological change or other factors may cause our revenues to decrease.

 

We may not be successful in our efforts to identify, acquire or integrate acquisitions.

Our failure to manage risks associated with acquisitions could harm our business. A component of our business strategy is to expand our presence in new or existing markets by acquiring additional businesses. For example, we most recently acquired ADP Context, Inc. in February 2004. Acquisitions involve a number of risks, including:

diversion of management’s attention;
difficulty in integrating and absorbing the acquired business and its employees, corporate culture, managerial systems and processes, technology, products and services;
failure to retain key personnel and employee turnover;
challenges in retaining customers of the acquired business and customer dissatisfaction or performance problems with an acquired firm;
assumption of unknown liabilities;
dilutive issuances of securities or use of debt or limited cash;
goodwill and potential impairment charges;
write-offs and amortization expenses; and
other unanticipated events or circumstances.

We may be unable to meet our future working capital requirements and any inability to finance our operationswhich could harm our business.

 

We could experience negative cash flow from operations in the future and could require substantial working capital to fund our business. We cannot be certain that financing will be available to us on favorable terms if and when required, or at all. If we raise funds through the issuance of equity, equity-related or debt securities, the securities may have rights,

preferences or privileges senior to those of the rights of our common stock and our stockholders may experience dilution. We could require substantial working capital to fund our business. Each of ActionPoint and Old Captiva frequently experienced negative cash flows from operations in the past, and we may experience negative cash flow from operations in the future. Notwithstanding these factors, we believe that we have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months.

 

We rely upon contractual provisions and domestic copyright and trademark laws to protect our proprietary rights. Such laws may not be sufficient to protect our intellectual property from others who may sell similar products.

We believe that the steps we have taken to safeguard our intellectual property afford only limited protection. We rely primarily on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We license our software products primarily under license agreements with our customers. Our trade secrets may be inadvertently or unlawfully disclosed. In addition, competitors may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology or design that do not infringe our copyrights and this could reduce demand for our products. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing the unauthorized use of our products and proprietary information is difficult and, although we are not able to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products and proprietary information exists, such piracy is expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws of many foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights and intellectual property as fully as the laws of the United States.

In the past, ActionPoint and Old Captivawe have depended heavily on service and other revenues to increase overall revenues, and we may not be able to sustain the existing levels of profitability of this part of our business.

 

Many ActionPointof our customers enter into professional services and Old Captiva customers entered into servicemaintenance agreements, which made up a significant portion of each company’s revenueour revenues in the past. Service and other revenues represented 43%40%, 40% and 32% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002. Service revenues represented 30% and 22% of ActionPoint’s total revenues for the years ended December 31, 20012003, 2002 and 2000, respectively. Service revenues represented 54% and 48% of Old Captiva’s total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The level of service revenues in the future will depend largely upon our implementationprofessional services and ongoing renewals of customer supportmaintenance contracts by our growing installed customer base. Our serviceprofessional services revenues could decline if third-party organizations such as systems integrators compete for the installation or servicing of our products. In addition, our customer supportmaintenance contracts might be downsized or might not be renewed in the future. Due to the increasing costs of operating a professional services organization, we may not be able to sustain profitability in this part of our business in the near future, or ever.

 

Our executive officersWe are subject to the effects of general economic and directors, and entities affiliated with them, have substantial control over us, which could delay or prevent a change in the corporate control favored by non-affiliate stockholders.geopolitical conditions.

 

Our executive officersbusiness is subject to the effects of general economic conditions and, directors,in particular, market conditions in the industries that we serve. Recent political turmoil in many parts of the world, including terrorist and entities affiliated with them, beneficially ownmilitary actions, may put pressure on global economic conditions. Our customers’ decisions to purchase our products are discretionary and subject to their internal budget and purchasing processes, which may be affected by the above factors. If economic conditions deteriorate, our business and operating results are likely to be adversely impacted.

Accounting charges resulting from mergers and acquisitions will continue to have a significant percentagenegative effect on earnings over future quarters.

The merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva has resulted in approximately $13.0 million of goodwill and other intangible assets being recorded on the books of the combined company. Of this amount, amortization of purchased intangibles, which is included as part of our common stock.cost of revenues, is expected to be $2.1 million, $1.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the years ending December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. These parties acting together would be able to significantly influence any matters requiring approvalnon-cash charges and additional charges arising from our acquisition of ADP Context, Inc. in February 2004 will negatively affect earnings during the amortization period, which could have a negative effect on our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions.stock price.

 

Provisions ofin our charter documents, Delaware law and our rights plan may have anti-takeover effects that could discourage or prevent a change in control, which may depress our stock price or cause it to decline.price.

 

Provisions ofin our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and a stockholder rights plan may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition of us that the majority of our stockholders may consider favorable. Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws:

 

prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors;

eliminate the ability of stockholders to call special meetings; and

establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

 

The terms of the rights plan are set forth in the rights agreement entered into by us and the rights agent. The rights granted pursuant to the rights agreement have anti-takeover effects, which may cause substantial dilution to any party that attempts to acquire us or our stock on terms that our board of directors determines are not in the best interests of our stockholders. Certain provisions of Delaware law also may discourage, delay or prevent a party from acquiring or merging with us, which may cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

 

We may not be able to maintain our listing on The Nasdaq National Market, in which event the liquidity and share price of our common stock will be adversely affected.

Our common stock is presently authorized for quotation on The Nasdaq National Market. Accordingly, we are subject to all the requirements of our listing agreement with Nasdaq. Certain events could cause us to have our status as a National Market Issuer terminated, including:

failure to maintain a closing bid price for our common stock of at least $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days;

failure to maintain stockholders’ equity of at least $10.0 million;

failure to maintain an audit committee that comports to the independence and other standards of The Nasdaq National Market and the Securities and Exchange Commission; and

failure to timely hold annual meetings of stockholders and comply with other corporate governance requirements.

Our common stock has had a closing bid price below the $1.00 minimum within the last six months, but for fewer than 30 consecutive trading days. If our common stock fails to maintain a closing bid price of at least $1.00, it could result in the delisting of our stock on The Nasdaq National Market. If our stock is delisted and thus no longer eligible for quotation on The Nasdaq National Market, it could trade either as a Nasdaq Small Cap issue or in the over-the-counter market, both of which are viewed by most investors as less desirable and less liquid marketplaces. The loss of our listing on The Nasdaq National Market could reduce the liquidity and share price of our common stock and would complicate compliance with state blue-sky laws.

Item 2.

Properties

 

Our principal offices are located in San Diego, California and consist of approximately 25,000 square feet of office space held under a lease that expires in January 2009. We also lease approximately 46,00024,000 square feet of office space in San Jose, California under a lease expiring in February 2004, of which approximately half is subleased to a third party,2010, approximately 8,200 square feet of office space in Park City, Utah under a lease expiring in June 2006, and 4,600 square feet of office space in Waltham, Massachusetts under a lease expiring in March 2007, bothall of which house a portion of Captiva’sour professional and technical services and software development employees. We also lease office space for sales and professional and technical services employees in Westmont, Illinois; Guildford, United Kingdom; Freiburg, Germany; Munich, GermanyGermany; and Toorak, Australia. We believe these offices are adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future.

 

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

 

Captiva Software Corporation is not a party to any material legal proceedings.

 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31, 2002.2003.

PART II

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Stock andEquity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “CPTV.” TheOur common stock was initially offered to the public in September 1993. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices on the Nasdaq National Market of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by Nasdaq. Such quotations represent inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

  

High


  

Low


Fiscal 2001

      

First Quarter

  

$

6.75

  

$

1.75

Second Quarter

  

 

6.25

  

 

2.51

Third Quarter

  

 

3.02

  

 

1.11

Fourth Quarter

  

 

1.89

  

 

1.17

  High

  Low

Fiscal 2002

            

First Quarter

  

$

3.15

  

$

1.57

  $3.15  $1.57

Second Quarter

  

 

2.14

  

 

1.60

   2.14   1.60

Third Quarter

  

 

1.66

  

 

0.80

   1.66   0.80

Fourth Quarter

  

 

1.75

  

 

0.68

   1.75   0.68

Fiscal 2003

      

First Quarter

  $3.25  $1.37

Second Quarter

   4.95   2.95

Third Quarter

   8.05   4.53

Fourth Quarter

   13.64   7.38

There were approximately 191 holders of record of our common stock as of February 29, 2004.

 

To date, we have neither declared nor paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and development of our business and, therefore, do not expect to declare or pay any cash dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, any such dividends would be required to be approved pursuant to the terms and conditions of our line of credit.

 

The information required to be disclosed by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation PlansPlans” is included under Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Item 6.

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

 

In the table below, we provide you with our summary historical consolidated financial data. We have prepared this information using our consolidated financial statements, for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998.1999. When you read this selected historical consolidated financial data, it is important that you read the historical consolidated financial statements and related notes as well as the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Amounts below are in thousands, except per share data.

 

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002(1)


   

2001


   

2000


   

1999


   

1998


 

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

                         

For continuing operations:

                         

Net revenue

  

$

35,604

 

  

$

22,035

 

  

$

25,042

 

  

$

22,178

 

  

$

17,409

 

Gross profit

  

 

26,116

 

  

 

17,667

 

  

 

19,781

 

  

 

18,964

 

  

 

15,661

 

Operating income (loss)

  

 

(868

)

  

 

(2,551

)

  

 

(8,353

)

  

 

(848

)

  

 

832

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  

 

(532

)

  

 

(1,915

)

  

 

(8,758

)

  

 

(141

)

  

 

1,039

 

Basic and diluted net income (loss) from continuing operations per share

  

$

(0.09

)

  

$

(0.45

)

  

$

(2.09

)

  

$

(0.03

)

  

$

0.18

 

Loss from discontinued operations

                      

$

(1,351

)

Basic and diluted net loss from discontinued operations per share

                      

$

(0.24

)

Net loss

  

$

(532

)

  

$

(1,915

)

  

$

(8,758

)

  

$

(141

)

  

$

(312

)

Basic and diluted net loss per share(2)

  

$

(0.09

)

  

$

(0.45

)

  

$

(2.09

)

  

$

(0.03

)

  

$

(0.06

)

Shares used in per share calculations

  

 

6,242

 

  

 

4,300

 

  

 

4,190

 

  

 

4,370

 

  

 

5,657

 

   Year Ended December 31,

 
    2003   2002(1)  2001   2000   1999 
   

  


 


 


 


Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

                     

Net revenue

  $57,145  $35,604  $22,035  $25,042  $22,178 

Gross profit

   36,514   26,116   17,667   19,781   18,964 

Income (loss) from operations

   3,675   (868)  (2,551)  (8,353)  (848)

Net income (loss)

   2,587   (532)  (1,915)  (8,758)  (141)

Basic net income (loss) per share (2)

  $0.27  $(0.09) $(0.45) $(2.09) $(0.03)

Diluted net income (loss) per share (2)

  $0.23  $(0.09) $(0.45) $(2.09) $(0.03)

Shares used in basic per share calculations

   9,484   6,242   4,300   4,190   4,370 

Shares used in diluted per share calculations

   11,234   6,242   4,300   4,190   4,370 


(1)(1)As a result of the purchase accounting that applies to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva,Merger, the results of operations of Old Captiva are included in our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 from August 1, 2002 and are excluded for all periods prior to the year ended December 31, 2002. The results for the year ended December 31, 2002 also include the amortization of purchased intangible assets of $1.0 million, mergerMerger costs of $2.1 million and a write-off of in-process research and development of $0.9 million.
(2)(2)See Note 31 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share and the number of shares used to compute basic and diluted net income (loss) per share.

 

   

As of December 31,


   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


  

1999


  

1998


Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

                    

Working capital

  

$

1,213

  

$

8,099

  

$

4,960

  

$

13,863

  

$

19,030

Total assets

  

 

35,136

  

 

15,328

  

 

17,801

  

 

23,178

  

 

26,877

Line of credit

  

 

2,145

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

Total stockholders’ equity

  

 

13,091

  

 

8,157

  

 

9,922

  

 

17,378

  

 

21,357

   As of December 31,

   2003

  2002

  2001

  2000

  1999

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

                    

Working capital

  $12,018  $1,213  $8,099  $4,960  $13,863

Total assets

   43,254   35,136   15,328   17,801   23,178

Line of credit

   —     2,145   —     —     —  

Total stockholders’ equity

   24,386   13,091   8,157   9,922   17,378

 

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

OVERVIEW:

 

We develop, market, deploy and service input management solutions used to manage business critical information from paper, faxed and electronic forms, documents and transactions into an organizations’s internal computing systems. Our objective is to extend our position as a leading provider of input management solutions. Key elements of our growth strategy include: leveraging our existing customer base, leveraging and expanding our sales channels and markets, expanding our international presence, broadening our product offerings, and pursuing strategic acquisitions.

In 2003, our revenues increased to $57.1 million from $35.6 million and $22.0 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. In addition, in 2003, we became profitable with net income of $2.6 million, as compared to net losses of $0.5 million and $1.9 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively.

On March 4,July 31, 2002, ActionPoint, Inc. entered into a merger agreementmerged with Captiva Software Corporation or Old Captiva. The merger was completed on July 31, 2002. In the merger,Merger, Old Captiva became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ActionPoint and ActionPoint changed its name to Captiva Software Corporation.

Corporation and remained a Delaware corporation. As a result of the purchase accounting that appliesapplied to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva,Merger, the results of operations of Old Captiva are included in our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 only from August 1, 2002. Therefore,We have included a pro forma presentation below to assist in making comparisons of our results on a combined company basis.

On February 1, 2004, we completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of ADP Context, Inc., an Illinois corporation (Context) for approximately $5.2 million of cash derived from our existing cash and cash equivalents. We acquired Context to expand our presence and application expertise in the payor side of the healthcare market and to extend our reach into the provider side of this market. We are not planning any significant changes to Context’s cost structure, and we expect to report increasedboth our consolidated revenues and increased costsexpenses to increase in the future periods as the operationsa result of Old Captiva will be included for an entire reporting period.this acquisition.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:POLICIES AND ESTIMATES:

 

A critical accounting policy is one whichthat is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition andor results of operations and requires significant judgment or complex estimation processes. We believe that the following accounting policies fit this definition:

 

Revenue Recognition

 

RevenueOur revenue is generated primarily from two sourcesthree sources: (i) software, primarily software licenses which includes software license and royalty revenue, androyalties, (ii) services, and other, which includesincluding software license maintenance fees, training fees and professional services revenue and (iii) hardware and other products, primarily sales of third party products, primarily digital scanners. Licensescanners in the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Software license revenue is recognized upon shipment provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, fees are fixed or determinable, collection is determined to be probable and no significant undelivered obligations remain. Royalty revenue is recognized when partnersour resellers ship or pre-purchase rights to ship products incorporating our software, provided collection of suchthe revenue is determined to be probable and we have no further obligations. Services and support revenue is recognized ratably over the period of the maintenance contract or as the services are provided. Payments for maintenance fees are generally made in advance and are non-refundable. Third partyRevenue for hardware sales revenueand other products is recognized when the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence thatof an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii) the selling price is fixed or determinable and;determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.

 

For arrangements with multiple elements (e.g., delivered and undelivered products, maintenance and other services), we allocate revenue to each element of the arrangement based on the fair value of the undelivered elements, which is specific to us, using the residual value method. The fair values for ongoing maintenance and support obligations are based upon separate sales of renewals to customers or upon substantive renewal rates quoted in the agreements. The fair values for services, such as training or consulting, are based upon sales prices of these services when sold separately to other customers. When software licenses are sold without services, revenue is recognized when the above criteria are met. Deferred revenue is primarily comprised of undelivered maintenance services.services and in some cases hardware and other products delivered but not yet accepted. When software licenses are sold with professional services and suchthose services are deemed essential to the functionality of the overall solution,software, combined software license and service revenue is recognized overas the service period.services are performed. When software licenses are sold with professional services and suchthose services are not considered essential to the functionality of the software, software license revenue is recognized when the above criteria are met and service revenue is recognized as the services are performed.

 

Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested at least annually for impairment. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from less than one year to five years.

 

The determination of the fair value of certain acquired assets and liabilities is subjective in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Determining the fair values and useful lives of

intangible assets especially requires the exercise of judgment. To assist us in this process, we used an independent valuation firm. While there are a number of different generally accepted valuation methods to estimate the value of intangible assets acquired, we primarily used the discounted cash flow method. This method requires significant management judgment to forecastin forecasting the future operating results used in the analysis. In addition,This method also requires other significant estimates, are required such as residual growth rates and discount factors. The estimates we have used are consistent with the plans and estimates that we use to manage our business, based on available historical information and industry averages. The judgments made in determining the estimated useful lives assigned to each class of assets acquired can also significantly affect our net operating results. Amortization of purchased intangibles is expected to be $2.1 million, $1.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the years ending December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

 

In addition, the value of our intangible assets, including goodwill, is subject to future impairmentsimpairment if we experience declines in operating results or negative industry or economic trends or if our future performance is below our projections and estimates.

 

Valuation of Goodwill

 

We assess the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment is reviewed at least annually.

Factors we consider important whichthat could trigger an impairment include the following:

 

Significant under performanceunderperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results;

Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;

Significant negative industry or economic trends;

Significant declinedeclines in our stock price for a sustained period; and

Decreased market capitalization relative to our net book value.

 

WhenIf there iswere an indication that the carrying value of goodwill maymight not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators, we would recognize an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amountvalue exceeds its fair value. We performed our annual impairment review in the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and determined there was no impairment.

Income Tax Valuation Allowance

On a quarterly basis, management evaluates the realizability of our net deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a valuation allowance. Realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. The amount of the net deferred tax assets actually realized could vary if there are differences in the timing or amount of future reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities or changes in the actual amounts of future taxable income. If we do not generate our forecasted taxable income, we may be required to establish a valuation allowance against all or part of our net deferred tax assets based upon applicable accounting criteria. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance, an expense will be recorded within the provision for income taxes line in our Statement of Operations. As of December 31, 2003, management has determined that it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets will be realized based on forecasted taxable income.

 

Recent Accounting PronouncementsRECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

 

In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” was issued Statementin January 2003, and a revision of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“FAS 146”)FIN 46 was issued in December 2003 (FIN 46R). This statement supercedes Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3,Liability Recognition for Certain EmployeeTermination Benefits and Other CostsFIN 46R requires certain variable interest entities to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurredbe consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in a Restructuring) (EITF 94-3). FAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. FAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. We recently initiated certain exit activities and are accounting for those activities under EITF 94-3. Accordingly, adoption of FAS 146 willentity do not have a material impact on our results of operations.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 (“FAS 148”). This statement amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation (“FAS 123”) to provide alternative methods of voluntarily transitioning to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. FAS 148 also amends the disclosure requirements of FAS 123 to require disclosure of the method used to account for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method on reported results in both annual and interim financial statements. The quarterly disclosure provisions will be effective for us beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2003. We will continue to utilize the intrinsic value method and accordingly, adoption of FAS 148 has no impact on our results of operations.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (the “Interpretation”). The Interpretation requires companies to recognize, at inception of the guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee and also requires a guarantor to make significant new disclosures, even when the likelihood of making any payments under the guarantee is remote. The Interpretation provides specific guidance identifying the characteristics of contracts that are subjecta controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its guidance in its entiretyactivities without additional subordinated financial support from those only subject to the initial recognition and measurement provisions.other parties. The recognition and measurement provisions of the Interpretation areFIN 46R were effective on a prospective basisimmediately for guarantees issued or modifiedall arrangements entered into after DecemberJanuary 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of the Interpretation are effective for interim and annual period financial statements ending after December 15, 2002. Although2003. Since January 31, 2003, we have issued guarantees and will likely continue to issue guaranteesnot invested in any entities that we believe are withinvariable interest entities. Had we entered into such arrangements prior to February 1, 2003, we would be required to adopt the scopeprovisions of FIN 46R at the end of the Interpretation,first quarter of 2004, in accordance with the fair value associated with such guarantees is not expected to be material. Accordingly,FASB Staff Position 46-6 which delayed the effective date of FIN 46R for those arrangements. We expect the adoption of the Interpretation is not currently expected toFIN 46R will have a material impactno effect on our results of operations.financial statements.

 

Pro Forma Results of OperationsRESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

 

The results of operations of Old Captiva are included in the year ended December 31, 2002 only from August 1, 2002. Accordingly, the following pro forma presentation is included to assist in making comparisons of our results on a combined basis. This pro forma presentation is prepared2002 in accordance with Accounting Principles Board No. 16,Business Combinationsgenerally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Certain prior year items have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on net revenues, income (loss) from operations or net income (loss) as previously reported.

The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for an entire year and should not be relied upon as such. The pro forma financial information below includes the results of operations from the Old Captiva business from January 1, 2001. In addition, the pro forma financial information above includes the amortization of purchased intangible assets from the beginning of each of the periods presented and $2.1 million in merger costs in the year ended December 31, 2002 and excludes a write-off of in-process research and development of $0.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2002. The following table sets forth certain pro forma income data for the periods indicated.

   

Year Ended

December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


 

Net revenues:

          

Software licenses

  

$

25,529

 

  

$

25,455

 

Services and other

  

 

23,054

 

  

 

20,841

 

   


  


Total revenues

  

 

48,583

 

  

 

46,296

 

Cost of revenues:

          

Software licenses

  

 

1,520

 

  

 

1,714

 

Services and other

  

 

11,725

 

  

 

10,903

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

  

 

2,076

 

  

 

2,175

 

   


  


Total cost of revenues

  

 

15,321

 

  

 

14,792

 

   


  


Gross profit

  

 

33,262

 

  

 

31,504

 

   


  


Operating expenses:

          

Research and development

  

 

7,749

 

  

 

7,828

 

Sales and marketing

  

 

18,863

 

  

 

20,691

 

General and administrative

  

 

6,140

 

  

 

6,704

 

Merger costs

  

 

2,148

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


Loss from operations

  

 

(1,638

)

  

 

(3,719

)

Other income (expense), net

  

 

(113

)

  

 

4,851

 

   


  


Income (loss) before income taxes

  

 

(1,751

)

  

 

1,132

 

Provision for income taxes

  

 

(345

)

  

 

2,074

 

   


  


Pro forma net loss

  

 

(1,406

)

  

 

(942

)

   


  


The following table sets forth, as a percentage of total revenues, certain pro forma incomestatement of operations data for the periods indicated.

 

  

Year Ended December 31,


   Year Ended
December 31,


 
  

2002


   

2001


   2003

 2002

 2001

 

Net revenues:

         

Software licenses

  

53

%

  

55

 %

Services and other

  

47

%

  

45

 %

Software

  47% 57% 68%

Services

  40% 40% 32%

Hardware and other

  13% 3%  
  

  

  

 

 

Total revenues

  

100

%

  

100

 %

  100% 100% 100%

Cost of revenues:

         

Software licenses

  

3

%

  

4

 %

Services and other

  

24

%

  

24

 %

Software

  5% 4% 4%

Services

  17% 18% 16%

Hardware and other

  10% 2%  

Amortization of purchased intangibles

  

4

%

  

5

 %

  4% 3%  
  

  

  

 

 

Total cost of revenues

  

31

%

  

33

 %

  36% 27% 20%
  

  

  

 

 

Gross profit

  

69

%

  

67

 %

  64% 73% 80%
  

  

  

 

 

Operating expenses:

         

Research and development

  

16

%

  

17

 %

  16% 17% 22%

Sales and marketing

  

39

%

  

45

 %

  31% 39% 55%

General and administrative

  

13

%

  

14

 %

  11% 12% 15%

Merger costs

  

4

%

  

—  

 

    6%  

Write-off of in-process research and development

    2%  
  

  

  

 

 

Loss from operations

  

(3

)%

  

(9

)%

Other income (expense), net

  

(1

)%

  

11

 %

Income (loss) from operations

  6% (3)% (12)%

Other income, net

  1% 2% 22%
  

  

  

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  

(4

)%

  

 

2 %

  7% (1)% 10%

Provision for income taxes

  

(1

)%

  

4

 %

  2
%
 
 
 1
%
 
 
 19%
  

  

  

 

 

Pro forma net loss

  

(3

)%

  

(2

)%

Net income (loss)

  5% (2)% (9)%
  

  

  

 

 

 

PRO FORMA RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

Revenues

Our license revenues were consistent at $25.5 million in 2002 and 2001. As a percent of total revenue, licenses accounted for 53% and 55% in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease in license revenues as a percentage of total revenues reflects an increase in third party product sales.

Our service and other revenues increased 11% in 2002 to $23.1 million from $20.8 million in 2001. As a percentage of total revenue, services accounted for 47% and 45% for 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increases in service and other revenues in total and as a percentage of total revenues reflect an increase in third party product sales.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased 6% for 2002 to $33.3 million from $31.5 million for 2001. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 69% from 67% for 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in gross profit for 2002 is due primarily to the increase in revenues and reflects decreases in combined headcount for 2002, which is partially offset by the increase in third party product sales, which have lower margins.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses were $7.7 million and $7.8 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. As a percent of revenue, research and development expenses were 16% for 2002 and 17% for 2001. The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenue reflects the increase in revenues.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses decreased 9% in 2002 to $18.9 million from $20.7 million in 2001. As a percent of revenue, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 39% for 2002 from 45% in 2001. The higher cost in 2001 is primarily attributable to marketing expenses incurred in early 2001 for the launch of our Dialog Server product, which was sold in May 2001.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased 8% for 2002 to $6.1 million from $6.7 million in 2001. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses decreased to 13% for 2002, from 14% for 2001. The decrease is attributable to professional fees and expenses incurred in 2001 in conjunction with various strategic initiatives.

Merger Costs

Details of the merger costs are as follows (in thousands):

   

Cash/

Non-cash


  

Estimated Cost


  

Completed Activity


     

Reserve

Balance at

December 31,

2002


Impairment of assets

  

Non-cash

  

$

471

  

$

(471

)

    

$

 —  

Excess lease costs

  

Cash

  

 

798

  

 

(139

)

    

 

659

Reduction in workforce

  

Cash

  

 

879

  

 

(660

)

    

 

219

      

  


    

      

$

2,148

  

$

(1,270

)

    

$

878

      

  


    

During the year ended December 31, 2002, as the result of a review of the combined operation, we adopted a plan which included a reduction of our workforce and office space made redundant by the merger. Implementation of this plan is expected to largely be completed during 2003. As a result of the adoption of this plan, we recorded charges of $2.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2002. These charges primarily relate to the consolidation of the Company’s continuing operations resulting in the impairment of an asset, excess lease costs and a reduction in workforce, resulting in costs incurred for employee severance.

Employee reductions occurred primarily in marketing and administrative areas. As a result of this plan, we reduced our work force by approximately 20 employees. Substantially all workforce reductions occurred during 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2002, charges related to the reduction of workforce totaling $0.9 million were recorded and activities costing $0.7 million were completed.

As a part of this plan, the carrying value of a prepaid royalty fee was written off. The technology associated with this royalty fee was utilized in certain of our products and because of technology acquired in the merger it will no longer be utilized. In the third quarter, we recorded a loss from impairment of an asset of $0.5 million, which was classified as a merger cost.

Also as part of this plan, we elected to consolidate our operations and attempt to sublease certain of our facilities which housed portions of our operations, marketing, sales and administrative activities. During the year ended December 31, 2002, we recorded estimated excess lease costs of $0.8 million which were recorded as merger costs. Estimated excess lease costs are based on assumptions of differences between lease payments and

sublease receipts that could be realized on a potential sublease and assumed carrying terms. In January 2003, we entered into an agreement to sublease the excess facility space. The sublease commenced in February 2003 and expires in February 2004. Future expected receipts under the sublease are $0.2 million and $40,000 for the years ending December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. These expected receipts are in excess of the estimated receipts used to estimate the merger costs recorded during the year ended December 31, 2002, however, due to the uncertainty of collectibility of these amounts, the estimated merger costs will be reduced as the sublease receipts are collected or reasonably expected to be collected.

Future cash outlays related to this plan of $0.9 million are expected to be completed in 2003.

Provision for Income Taxes

A tax benefit of $0.3 million has been recorded for 2002, which represents an effective tax rate of 20%. As a result of the merger, we recorded a substantial amount of non-deductible amortization charges and a non-deductible in-process research and development write-off. In addition, as a result of the merger, our ability to utilize its historical net operating losses and tax credits as well as the historical net operating losses and tax credits of the Old Captiva business may have become limited and therefore it is more likely than not that a substantial portion of those deferred tax assets will not be realized. The income tax provision of $4.0 million recorded during the year ended December, 2001 is comprised of the following: tax on the gain from the sale of our Dialog Server product of $1.7 million, the change in valuation allowance of approximately $3.1 million to reduce net deferred tax assets based on management’s assessment of the uncertainty of the realizability of such assets, and a provision for foreign taxes of approximately $0.2 million offset by the utilization of net operating losses of $1.0 million.

Sale of the Dialog Server Product

We sold our Dialog Server product to Chordiant Software, Inc. on May 17, 2001 for approximately $7.1 million consisting of $2.0 million in cash and 1.7 million shares of Chordiant common stock, which was valued at $3.00 per share at the transaction date. We sold all of our Chordiant common stock in July 2001 for a price of approximately $2.73 per share and, as a result, recognized a loss of approximately $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2001. We recognized a pretax gain on the transaction, comprised of proceeds, excluding amounts in escrow and less transaction expenses, of approximately $4.6 million ($2.3 million net of tax). A portion of the total proceeds remained in escrow for one year pursuant to the asset sale agreement with Chordiant and $0.6 million of this amount was received by us in May 2002. The escrow funds were not included on the balance sheet or in the computation of gain on sale; hence, the receipt of funds in May 2002 was recognized as other income for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Results of Operations

 

Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002

Revenues

Total revenues increased 61% in 2003 to $57.1 million from $35.6 million in 2002.

Our software revenues increased 33% in 2003 to $27.0 million from $20.3 million in 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, software revenues accounted for 47% in 2003 and 57% in 2002. The following table sets forth,increase in software revenues in absolute terms was attributable primarily to the Merger. The decrease in software revenues as a percentage of total revenues certain income datareflects the lower software revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated.Old Captiva business and the increase in hardware and other revenues as a percentage of total revenues in 2003 as a result of an increase in sales of digital scanners. In absolute terms and as a percentage of total revenues, we expect software revenues to increase from 2003 to 2004.

 

   

Year Ended

December 31,


 
   

2002


     

2001


     

2000


 

Net revenues:

                

Software licenses

  

57

 %

    

68

 %

    

7

6 %

Services and other

  

43

 %

    

32

 %

    

2

4 %

   

    

    

Total revenues

  

100

 %

    

100

 %

    

100

 %

Cost of revenues:

                

Software licenses

  

3

 %

    

4

 %

    

2

 %

Services and other

  

21

 %

    

16

 %

    

19

 %

Amortization of purchased intangibles

  

3

 %

    

—  

 

    

—  

 

   

    

    

Total cost of revenues

  

27

 %

    

20

 %

    

21

 %

   

    

    

Gross profit

  

73

 %

    

80

 %

    

79

 %

   

    

    

Operating expenses:

                

Research and development

  

17

 %

    

22

 %

    

28

 %

Sales and marketing

  

39

 %

    

55

 %

    

66

 %

General and administrative

�� 

12

 %

    

15

 %

    

19

 %

Merger costs

  

6

 %

    

—  

 

    

—  

 

Write-off of in-process research and development

  

2

 %

    

—  

 

    

—  

 

   

    

    

Loss from operations

  

(3

)%

    

(12

)%

    

(33

)%

Other income (expense), net

  

2

 %

    

22

 %

    

(2

)%

   

    

    

Income (loss) before income taxes

  

(1

)%

    

10

 %

    

(35

)%

Provision for income taxes

  

1

 %

    

19

 %

    

—  

 

   

    

    

Net loss

  

(2

)%

    

(9

)%

    

(35

)%

   

    

    

Our service revenues increased 61% in 2003 to $22.7 million from $14.1 million in 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, services accounted for 40% for both 2003 and 2002. The increase in service revenues in absolute terms was attributable primarily to the Merger. The consistency of service revenues as a percentage of total revenues was due to the higher service revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the Old Captiva business

and a growing installed base of customers, most of which purchase ongoing software maintenance support, offset by the increase in hardware and other revenues as a percentage of total revenues in 2003 as a result of an increase in sales of digital scanners. We expect service revenues to increase in absolute terms in the future as we continue to grow our installed base of customers and maintain our maintenance renewal rates.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:Our hardware and other revenues increased 533% in 2003 to $7.4 million from $1.2 million in 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, hardware and other revenues accounted for 13% in 2003 and 3% in 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in sales of digital scanners in 2003, which were not sold by us until the third quarter of 2002. In absolute terms, we expect hardware and other revenues to remain constant from 2003 to 2004.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased 40% in 2003 to $36.5 million from $26.1 million in 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues decreased to 64% in 2003 from 73% in 2002. The increase in absolute terms was primarily attributable to the increased revenues related to the Merger and partially offset by the increase in amortization of intangible assets of $1.1 million also related to the Merger. The decrease in percentage terms was primarily attributable to Old Captiva’s revenue mix, which equated to a lower gross margin percentage than our historical gross margin, and the increase in hardware and other revenues in 2003, which have lower gross margins relative to software and service revenues.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses increased 52% in 2003 to $9.0 million from $5.9 million in 2002. The increase is primarily attributable to the Merger. As a percentage of total revenues, research and development expenses decreased to 16% in 2003 from 17% in 2002. The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues primarily reflects a lower percentage of research and development expense relative to revenue for the Old Captiva business and the increase in absolute terms being offset by the increase in total revenues in 2003 compared to 2002. We expect research and development expenses to increase in absolute terms in 2004 due to an expansion of our research and development staff.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses increased 30% in 2003 to $17.8 million from $13.7 million in 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, sales and marketing expenses were 31% in 2003 and 39% in 2002. The increase in absolute terms was primarily attributable to the Merger. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues reflects the lower percentage of sales and marketing expense relative to revenue for the Old Captiva business and the increase in absolute terms being offset by the increase in total revenues in 2003. We expect sales expenses to continue to increase in absolute terms in 2004 due to an expansion of our sales force and revenue growth.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses increased 41% in 2003 to $6.1 million from $4.3 million in 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses were 11% in 2003 and 12% in 2002. The increase in absolute terms was primarily attributable to increases in staffing resulting from the Merger. The decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues was due to cost efficiencies that have been realized post-Merger and the increase in absolute terms being offset by the increase in total revenues in 2003.

Merger Costs

We recorded Merger costs of $2.1 million during 2002, including estimated excess lease costs of $0.8 million. Estimated excess lease costs were based on the expected differences between our lease payments and the sublease receipts that could be realized on a potential sublease. In 2003, we recorded sublease receipts in excess of estimated receipts of $58,000.

Details of the Merger costs are as follows (in thousands):

   

Cash/

Non-cash


  Estimated
Cost


  

Completed
Activity

2002


  

Completed
Activity

2003


  

Adjustments

2003


  Accrual Balance
at December 31,
2003


Impairment of assets

  Non-cash  $471  $(471) $  $  $

Excess lease costs

  Cash   798   (139)  (487)  (58)  114

Reduction in workforce

  Cash   879   (660)  (219)     
      

  


 


 


 

      $2,148  $(1,270) $(706) $(58) $114
      

  


 


 


 

In-process Research and Development

In connection with the Merger, we wrote-off the purchased in-process research and development of $0.9 million, which was charged to operations in 2002.

Other Income, Net

Approximately $0.6 million of amounts held in escrow in conjunction with the May 2001 sale of the Dialog Server business to Chordiant Software, Inc. were received and recognized as other income in 2002.

Provision for Income Taxes

In 2003, we recorded a tax provision of $1.2 million, comprised of a provision for federal and state taxes of approximately $1.5 million, a provision for foreign taxes of approximately $0.4 million, research and development credits of approximately $(0.3) million, and a release of a valuation allowance of $(0.4) million, the net of which represented an effective tax rate of 31%. We released the valuation allowance of $(0.4) million based upon management’s determination that it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets will be realized. A tax provision of $0.3 million was recorded for 2002, which represented an effective tax rate of (118)%. As a result of the Merger in 2002, we recorded substantial non-deductible amortization charges and a non-deductible in-process research and development write-off.

 

Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

 

Revenues

Total revenues increased 62% in 2002 to $35.6 million from $22.0 million in 2001.

 

Our licensesoftware revenues increased 35%36% in 2002 to $20.2$20.3 million from $15.0 million in 2001. As a percentpercentage of total revenue, licensesrevenues, software revenues accounted for 57% in 2002 and 68% in 2002 and 2001, respectively.2001. The increase in license revenue for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 2001 issoftware revenues in absolute terms was attributable primarily due to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva.Merger. The decreasesdecrease in licensesoftware revenues as a percentage of total revenues reflectreflects the lower licensesoftware revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the Old Captiva business.

 

Our service and other revenues increased 119%100% in 2002 to $15.4$14.1 million from $7.1 million in 2001. As a percentage of total revenue,revenues, services accounted for 43%40% in 2002 and 32% for 2002 and 2001, respectively.in 2001. The increase in service revenues both in

absolute and percentage terms was attributable primarily to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva.Merger. The increases in service and other revenues as a percentage of total revenues reflect the higher service revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the Old Captiva business and an increase in third party product sales.business.

 

Our hardware and other revenues in 2002 were $1.2 million. There were no hardware and other revenues in 2001.

Gross Profit

 

Gross profit increased 48% forin 2002 to $26.1 million from $17.7 million forin 2001. The increase in gross profit forin 2002 is due primarily to the increase in revenues, partially offset by the amortization of intangible assets resulting from the merger of ActionPoint and Old CaptivaMerger and the increase of servicehardware and other revenuerevenues as a percentage of total revenue,revenues, which carries lower gross profit.

 

Gross profit as a percentage of revenuetotal revenues decreased to 73% in 2002 from 80% for 2002 and 2001, respectively.in 2001. The decrease is primarily attributable to the amortization of purchased intangibles which resulted from the merger of ActionPoint and Old CaptivaMerger and the increase of service revenueand hardware and other revenues as a percentage of total revenues. Since the periods presented only reflect amortization of purchased intangibles from August 1, 2002, management expects this amortization to have a more significant impact in future periods. Initially, in future periods, amortization of purchased intangibles will further decrease gross profit.

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses increased 20% in 2002 to $5.9 million from $4.9 million in 2001. The increase is attributable to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva.

Merger. As a percentpercentage of revenue,total revenues, research and development expenses decreased to 17% forin 2002 from 22% forin 2001. The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenuetotal revenues reflects a lower percentage of research and development expense to revenuerevenues for the Old Captiva business, and to a higher percentage of research and development expense to revenuerevenues for the Dialog Server product line, which was sold in May 2001. Management expects research and development expense to increase in absolute dollars in reporting periods that include the Old Captiva business for the entire period.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

Sales and marketing expenses increased 14% in 2002 to $13.7 million from $12.0 million in 2001. The increase is primarily attributable to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva which isMerger, partially offset by reductions in marketing expenses incurred in 2001 for the launch of the Company’s Dialog Server product, which was sold in May 2001.

 

As a percentpercentage of revenue,total revenues, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 39% for 2002 from 55% in 2001.The decreases in sales and marketingmaketing expenses as a percentage of revenuetotal revenues reflect a lower percentage of marketing expense to revenue for the Old Captiva business. Management expects sales and marketing expense to increase in absolute dollars in reporting periods that include the Old Captiva business for the entire period.

 

General and Administrative

 

General and administrative expenses increased 33% for 2002 to $4.3 million from $3.3 million in 2001. The increase is attributable to the merger of ActionPoint and Old Captiva and isMerger, partially offset by professional fees and expenses incurred in 2001 in conjunction with various strategic initiatives.

 

As a percentage of revenue,total revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 12% forin 2002, from 15% forin 2001. The decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenuetotal revenues reflects a lower percentage of general and administrative expense to revenuerevenues for the Old Captiva business. Management expects general and administrative expense to increase in absolute dollars in reporting periods that include the Old Captiva business for the entire period.

Merger Costs

 

Details of the mergerMerger costs are as follows (in thousands):

 

  

Cash/

Non-cash


  

Estimated Cost


  

Completed Activity


     

Reserve Balance at

December 31, 2002


  

Cash/
Non-

cash


  Estimated
Cost


  Completed
Activity


 Accrual Balance
at December 31,
2002


Impairment of assets

  

Non-cash

  

$

471

  

$

(471

)

    

$

 —  

  Non-cash  $471  $(471) $

Excess lease costs

  

Cash

  

 

798

  

 

(139

)

    

 

659

  Cash   798   (139)  659

Reduction in workforce

  

Cash

  

 

879

  

 

(660

)

    

 

219

  Cash   879   (660)  219
     

  


    

     

  


 

     

$

2,148

  

$

(1,270

)

    

$

878

     $2,148  $(1,270) $878
     

  


    

     

  


 

 

During the year ended December 31,In 2002, as the result of a review of the combined operation, we adopted a plan whichthat included a reduction of our workforce and office space made redundant by the merger.Merger. Implementation of this plan is expected towas largely be completed during 2003. As a result of the adoption of this plan, we recorded charges of $2.1 million during the year ended December 31,in 2002. These charges primarily relaterelated to the consolidation of our continuing operations resulting in the impairment of an asset, excess lease costs and a reduction in workforce, resulting in costs incurred for employee severance.

 

Employee reductions occurred primarily in marketing and administrative areas. As a result of this plan, we reduced our workforce by approximately 20 employees. Substantially all workforce reductions occurred during 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2002, charges related to the reduction of workforce totaling $0.9 million were recorded and activities costing $0.7 million were completed.

 

As a part of this plan, the carrying value of a prepaid royalty fee was written off. The technology associated with this royalty fee was utilized in certain of our products and because of technology acquired in the mergerMerger it willwas no longer going to be utilized. In the third quarter, we recorded a loss from impairment of an asset of $0.5 million, which was classified as a mergerMerger cost.

 

Also as part of this plan, we elected to consolidate our operations and attempt to sublease certain of itsour facilities which housed portions of itsour operations, marketing, sales and administrative activities. During the year ended December 31,In 2002, we recorded estimated excess lease costs of $0.8 million which were recorded as mergerMerger costs. Estimated excess lease costs are based on assumptions of differences between our lease payments and the sublease receipts that could be realized on a potential sublease and assumed carrying terms. In January 2003, we entered into an agreement to sublease the excess facility space. The sublease commenced in February 2003 and expires in February 2004. Future expected receipts under the sublease are $0.2 million and $40,000 for the years ending December 31,in 2003 and 2004, respectively. These expected receipts are in excess of the estimated receipts used to estimate the mergerMerger costs recorded during the year ended December 31, 2002, however, due to the uncertaintyuncertanty of collectibility of these amounts, the estimated mergerMerger costs will be reduced as the sublease receipts are collected or reasonably expected to be collected.

 

Future cash outlays related to this plan of $0.9 million are expected to be completed in 2003.

In-Process Research and Development

 

In connection with the merger,Merger, we wrote-off the purchased in-process research and development of $0.9 million, which was charged to operations for the year ended December 31,in 2002. The purchased in-process research and development iswas solely related to the next version of Old Captiva’s FormWare software. The latest release of Old Captiva’s FormwareFormWare software prior to the Merger was introduced in March 2002. Old Captiva’s forms processing solutions complement our existing line of document capture solutions to create a more complete input

management software solution. Based on time spent on the next version of Old Captiva’s FormWareFormware software system and costs incurred, this project was estimated to be approximately 44% complete as of the mergerMerger date. At the date of acquisition, the total cost to complete the project was estimated to be approximately $0.8 million, primarily consisting of salaries, and the project is expected to bewas completed during the second quarter of 2003.2003, as expected. The estimated fair value of the project was estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow model which was based on estimates of operating results and capital expenditures for the period from August 1, 2002 to December 31, 2006 and a risk adjusted discount rate of 30%.

Provision for Income Taxes

 

A tax provision of $0.3 million has beenwas recorded for 2002, which represents an effective tax rate of (118)%. As a result of the merger,Merger, we recorded a substantial amount of non-deductible amortization charges and a non-deductible in-process research and development write-off. In addition, as a result of the merger,Merger, our ability to utilize our historical net operating losses and tax credits as well as the historical net operating losses and tax credits of the Old Captiva business may have become limited and thereforelimited. At December 31, 2002, it iswas more likely than not that a substantial portion of those deferred tax assets willwould not be realized. The income tax provision of $4.2 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2001 is comprised of the following: tax on the gain from the sale of our Dialog Server product of $1.7 million, the change in valuation allowance of approximately $3.3 million to reduce net deferred tax assets based on management’s assessment of the uncertainty of the realizability of such assets, and a provision for foreign taxes of approximately $0.2 million offset by the utilization of net operating losses of $1.0 million.

 

Sale of the Dialog Server Product

 

We sold our Dialog Server product to Chordiant Software, Inc. on May 17, 2001 for approximately $7.1 million consisting of $2.0 million in cash and 1.7 million shares of Chordiant common stock, which was valued at $3$3.00 per share at the transaction date. We sold all of our Chordiant common stock in July 2001 for a price of approximately $2.73 per share and as a result, recognized a loss of approximately $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2001. We recognized a pretax gain on the transaction comprised of proceeds, excluding amounts in escrow and less transaction expenses, of approximately $4.6 million ($2.3 million net of tax). comprised of proceeds other than amounts in escrow and less transaction expenses. A portion of the total proceeds remained in escrow for one year pursuant to the asset sale agreement with Chordiant and $0.6 million of this amount was received by us in May 2002. The escrow funds were not included on the balance sheet or in the computation of gain on sale; hence, the receipt of funds in May 2002 was recognized as other income forin 2002.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – PRO FORMA COMBINED COMPANY:

The results of operations of Old Captiva are included in the year ended December 31, 2002 beginning August 1, 2002, in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, the following pro forma presentation is included to assist in making comparisons of our results on a combined company basis. This pro forma presentation is prepared in a manner consistent with the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations”.

The pro forma financial information presented below includes the results of operations from the Old Captiva business from January 1, 2001. In addition, the pro forma financial information below includes the amortization of purchased intangible assets from the beginning of each of the periods presented and $2.1 million in merger costs in the year ended December 31, 2002 and excludes a write-off of in-process research and development of $0.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2002. The following table sets forth certain pro forma income (loss) data for the periods indicated. Certain prior year items have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on net revenues, income (loss) from operations or net income (loss) as previously reported.

   Year Ended December 31,

 
   2003

  2002

  2001

 
   (Actual)  (Pro Forma
Combined)
  (Pro Forma
Combined)
 

Net revenues:

             

Software

  $27,006  $25,710  $25,455 

Services

   22,724   20,918   20,841 

Hardware and other

   7,415   1,955    
   


 


 


Total revenues

   57,145   48,583   46,296 

Cost of revenues:

             

Software

   2,631   1,677   1,714 

Services

   9,936   10,062   10,903 

Hardware and other

   5,969   1,506    

Amortization of purchased intangibles

   2,095   2,076   2,175 
   


 


 


Total cost of revenues

   20,631   15,321   14,792 
   


 


 


Gross profit

   36,514   33,262   31,504 
   


 


 


Operating expenses:

             

Research and development

   8,979   7,749   7,828 

Sales and marketing

   17,816   18,863   20,691 

General and administrative

   6,102   6,140   6,704 

Merger costs

   (58)  2,148    
   


 


 


Income (loss) from operations

   3,675   (1,638)  (3,719)

Other income (expense), net

   74   (113)  4,851 
   


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

   3,749   (1,751)  1,132 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

   1,162   (345)  2,074 
   


 


 


Pro forma net income (loss)

  $2,587  $(1,406) $(942)
   


 


 


The following table sets forth, as a percentage of total revenues, certain pro forma statement of operations data for the periods indicated.

   Year Ended December 31,

 
   2003

  2002

  2001

 
   (Actual)  (Pro Forma
Combined)
  (Pro Forma
Combined)
 

Net revenues:

          

Software

  47% 53% 55%

Services

  40% 43% 45%

Hardware and other

  13% 4%  
   

 

 

Total revenues

  100% 100% 100%

Cost of revenues:

          

Software

  5% 3% 4%

Services

  17% 21% 24%

Hardware and other

  10% 3%  

Amortization of purchased intangibles

  4% 4% 5%
   

 

 

Total cost of revenues

  36% 31% 33%
   

 

 

Gross profit

  64% 69% 67%
   

 

 

Operating expenses:

          

Research and development

  16% 16% 17%

Sales and marketing

  31% 39% 45%

General and administrative

  11% 13% 14%

Merger costs

    4%  
   

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

  6% (3)% (9)%

Other income (expense), net

  1% (1)% 11%
   

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  7% (4)% 2%

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

  2% (1)% 4%
   

 

 

Pro forma net income (loss)

  5% (3)% (2)%
   

 

 

Results of Operations—Proforma Combined Company

 

Years Ended December 31, 20012003 and 20002002

 

Revenues

Total revenues increased 18% in 2003 to $57.1 million from $48.6 million in 2002.

 

Our licensesoftware revenues decreased by 21%increased 5% in 20012003 to $15.0$27.0 million from $19.0$25.7 million in 2000.2002. As a percentage of total revenues, software revenues accounted for 47% in 2003 and 53% in 2002. The decrease in license revenue for 2001 was due to information technology spending on internet related products and services and in part tosoftware revenues as a weak economy, which led to extended sales cycles and general slowdowns in information technology spending. License and royalties accounted for 68% and 76%percentage of 2001 and 2000 total revenues respectively.was primarily attributable to the increase in hardware and other revenues as a percentage of total revenues in 2003 as a result of an increase in sales of digital scanners. In absolute terms and as a percentage of total revenues, we expect software revenues to increase from 2003 to 2004.

 

Our service revenues which are derived from software maintenance and professional consulting, increased by 18%9% in 20012003 to $7.1$22.7 million from $6.0$20.9 million in 2000. This represents 32% and 24%2002. As a percentage of 2001 and 2000 total revenues, respectively.services accounted for 40% in 2003 and 43% in 2002. The increase in service revenues in both absolute and percentage terms was primarily attributable toreflects a growing installed base of customers, most of which purchase ongoing software maintenance support. The decrease in service revenues as a percentage of total revenues was primarily attributable to the increase in hardware and other revenues as a percentage of total revenues in 2003 as a result of an increase in sales of digital scanners. We expect service revenues to increase in absolute terms in the future as we continue to grow our installed base of customers and maintain our maintenance renewal rates.

Our hardware and other revenues increased 279% in 2003 to $7.4 million from $2.0 million in 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, hardware and other revenues accounted for 13% in 2003 and 4% in 2002. The increases in hardware and other revenues in absolute terms and as a percentage of total revenues reflect an increase in sales of digital scanners, which Old Captiva introduced in the first quarter of 2002. In absolute terms, we expect hardware and other revenues to remain constant from 2003 to 2004.

 

Gross Profit

 

Gross profit decreased by 11%increased 13% in 2003 to $17.7$36.5 million from $32.3 million in 2001 from $19.8 million in 2000.2002. Gross profit margin increasedas a percentage of total revenues decreased to 80%64% in 20012003 from 79%69% in 2000. Fluctuations2002. The decrease in gross profit margins are generally attributableas a percentage of total revenues was due primarily to the

change in revenue mix ofdue to the increase in hardware and other revenues, which have lower gross margins relative to software license revenues and lower margin servicesservice revenues. Gross profit margin for services revenues increased to 51% in 2001 compared to 21% in 2000 largely as a result of expense reductions.

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses decreased by 30%increased 16% in 20012003 to $4.9$9.0 million from $7.0$7.7 million in 2000. The decrease in 2001 is largely related to the sale2002. As a percentage of the Dialog Server product in May 2001.

Researchtotal revenues, research and development expenses decreasedwere 16% in both 2003 and 2002. The increase in research and development expenses in absolute terms was attributable to increases in headcount and related labor costs needed to meet product development requirements. The consistency in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenuetotal revenues was due to 22%the increase in 2001, from 28%absolute terms being offset by the increase in 2000.total revenues in 2003. We expect research and development expenses to increase in absolute terms in 2004 due to an expansion of our research and development staff.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 27%6% in 20012003 to $12.0$17.8 million from $16.4$18.9 million in 2000.2002. As a percentage of total revenues, sales and marketing expenses were 31% in 2003 and 39% in 2002. The decrease in 2001 is largelysales and marketing expenses in absolute terms and as a percentage of total revenues was primarily attributable to the cost efficiencies that have been realized post-Merger through combining the sales and marketing operations of Old Captiva and ActionPoint. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues was also due to reductionsthe increase in total revenues in 2003. We expect sales expenses to increase in absolute terms in 2004 due to an expansion of our sales force and revenue growth.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses remained constant at $6.1 million in 2003 and 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 11% in 2003 from 13% in 2002, as a result of the increase in total revenues in 2003.

Merger Costs

We recorded Merger costs of $2.1 million during 2002, including estimated excess lease costs of $0.8 million. Estimated excess lease costs were based on the expected differences between our lease payments and the sublease receipts that could be realized on a potential sublease. In 2003, we recorded sublease receipts in excess of estimated receipts of $58,000.

Details of the Merger costs are as follows (in thousands):

   

Cash/

Non-

cash


  Estimated
Cost


  

Completed
Activity

2002


  

Completed
Activity

2003


  

Adjustments

2003


  Accrual Balance
at December 31,
2003


Impairment of assets

  Non-cash  $471  $(471) $  $  $

Excess lease costs

  Cash   798   (139)  (487)  (58)  114

Reduction in workforce

  Cash   879   (660)  (219)     
      

  


 


 


 

      $2,148  $(1,270) $(706) $(58) $114
      

  


 


 


 

Other Income, Net

Approximately $0.6 million of amounts held in escrow in conjunction with the May 2001 sale of the Dialog Server business to Chordiant Software, Inc. were received and recognized as other income in 2002.

Provision for Income Taxes

In 2003, we recorded a tax provision of $1.2 million, comprised of a provision for federal and state taxes of approximately $1.5 million, a provision for foreign taxes of approximately $0.4 million, research and development credits of approximately $(0.3) million, and a release of a valuation allowance of $(0.4) million, the net of which represented an effective tax rate of 31%. We released the valuation allowance of $(0.4) million based upon management’s determination that it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets will be realized. A tax benefit of $0.3 million was recorded for 2002, which represented an effective tax rate of 20%. As a result of the Merger in 2002, we recorded substantial non-deductible amortization charges and a non-deductible in-process research and development write-off.

Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001

Revenues

Total revenues increased 5% in 2002 to $48.6 million from $46.3 million in 2001.

Our software revenues were relatively constant, increasing only 1% in 2002 to $25.7 million from $25.5 million in 2001. As a percentage of total revenues, software revenues accounted for 53% in 2002 and 55% in 2001. The decrease in software revenues as a percentage of total revenues reflects an increase in total revenues in 2002.

Our service revenues were constant at $20.9 million in 2002 and $20.8 million in 2001. As a percentage of total revenues, services accounted for 43% in 2002 and 45% in 2001. The decrease in service revenues as a percentage of total revenues reflects an increase in total revenues in 2002.

Our hardware and other revenues in 2002 were $2.0 million. There were no hardware and other revenues in 2001.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased 6% in 2002 to $33.3 million from $31.5 million in 2001. Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues increased to 69% in 2002 from 67% in 2001. The increase in gross profit for 2002 is due primarily to the increase in revenues and reflects decreases in combined headcount for 2002, which is partially offset by the increase in hardware and other revenues, which have lower margins.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses were $7.7 million in 2002 and $7.8 million in 2001. As a percentage of total revenues, research and development expenses were 16% in 2002 and 17% in 2001. The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues reflects the increase in total revenues.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses decreased 9% in 2002 to $18.9 million from $20.7 million in 2001. As a percentage of total revenues, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 39% in 2002 from 45% in 2001. The higher cost in 2001 was primarily attributable to marketing expenses incurred in 2000 and early 2001 for the launch of our Dialog Server product, which was sold in May 2001. Additionally, there was a stock related bonus expense of $0.6 million in 2000.

 

SalesGeneral and marketing expenses decreased as a percentage of revenue to 55% in 2001, from 66% in 2000.Administrative

 

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased by 31%8% in 20012002 to $3.3$6.1 million from $4.7$6.7 million in 2000. This decrease is primarily attributable to2001. As a $1.1 million stock related bonus in 2000.

Generalpercentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of revenue to 15%13% in 2002, from 14% in 2001. Both decreases were attributable to professional fees and expenses incurred in 2001 from 19% in 2000.conjunction with various strategic initiatives.

 

Merger Costs

Details of the Merger costs are as follows (in thousands):

   

Cash/

Non-

cash


  Estimated
Cost


  Completed
Activity


  Accrual Balance
at December 31,
2002


Impairment of assets

  Non-cash  $471  $(471) $

Excess lease costs

  Cash   798   (139)  659

Reduction in workforce

  Cash   879   (660)  219
      

  


 

      $2,148  $(1,270) $878
      

  


 

In 2002, as the result of a review of the combined operation, we adopted a plan that included a reduction of our workforce and office space made redundant by the Merger. Implementation of this plan was largely completed during 2003. As a result of the adoption of this plan, we recorded charges of $2.1 million in 2002. These charges primarily related to the consolidation of our continuing operations resulting in the impairment of an asset, excess lease costs and a reduction in workforce, resulting in costs incurred for employee severance.

Employee reductions occurred primarily in marketing and administrative areas. As a result of this plan, we reduced our workforce by approximately 20 employees. Substantially all workforce reductions occurred during 2002. During 2002, charges related to the reduction of workforce totaling $0.9 million were recorded and activities costing $0.7 million were completed.

As a part of this plan, the carrying value of a prepaid royalty fee was written off. The technology associated with this royalty fee was utilized in certain of our products and because of technology acquired in the Merger it was no longer going to be utilized. In the third quarter, we recorded a loss from impairment of an asset of $0.5 million, which was classified as a Merger cost.

Also as part of this plan, we elected to consolidate our operations and attempt to sublease certain of our facilities which housed portions of our operations, marketing, sales and administrative activities. During 2002, we recorded estimated excess lease costs of $0.8 million which were recorded as Merger costs. Estimated excess lease costs are based on assumptions of differences between our lease payments and the sublease receipts that could be realized on a potential sublease and assumed carrying terms. In January 2003, we entered into an agreement to sublease the excess facility space. The sublease commenced in February 2003 and expires in February 2004. Future expected receipts under the sublease are $0.2 million and $40,000 in 2003 and 2004, respectively. These expected receipts are in excess of the estimated receipts used to estimate the Merger costs recorded during 2002, however, due to the uncertanty of collectibility of these amounts, the estimated Merger costs will be reduced as the sublease receipts are collected or reasonably expected to be collected.

Provision for Income Taxes

A tax benefit of $0.3 million was recorded for 2002, which represented an effective tax rate of 20%. As a result of the Merger, we recorded a substantial amount of non-deductible amortization charges and a non-deductible in-process research and development write-off. In addition, as a result of the Merger, our ability to utilize our historical net operating losses and tax credits as well as the historical net operating losses and tax credits of the Old Captiva business may have become limited. At December 31, 2002, it was more likely than not that a substantial portion of those deferred tax assets would not be realized. The income tax provision of $4.0 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2001 is comprised of the following: tax on the gain from the sale of our Dialog Server product of $1.7 million, the change in valuation allowance of approximately $3.1 million to reduce net deferred tax assets based on management’s assessment of the uncertainty of the realizability of such assets, and a provision for foreign taxes of approximately $0.2 million offset by the utilization of net operating losses of $1.0 million.

Sale of the Dialog Server Product

 

We sold our Dialog Server product to Chordiant Software, Inc. on May 17, 2001 for approximately $7.1 million consisting of $2.0 million in cash and 1.7 million shares of Chordiant common stock, which was valued at $3$3.00 per share at the transaction date. We sold all of theour Chordiant common stock including the shares held in escrow, in July 2001 atfor a price of approximately $2.73 per share and recognized a loss of approximately $0.4 million.million in the third quarter of 2001. We recognized a pretax gain on the transaction comprised of proceeds, excluding amounts in escrow and less transaction expenses, of approximately $4.6 million ($2.3 million net of tax). Of comprised of proceeds other than amounts in escrow and less transaction expenses. A portion of the total proceeds $0.6 million in cash remained in escrow at December 31, 2001for one year pursuant to the asset sale agreement with Chordiant and $0.6 million of this amount was not released untilreceived by us in May 2002. Accordingly, this amount wasThe escrow funds were not included on the balance sheet at December 31, 2001 or in the computation of gain on sale forsale; hence, the year ended December 31, 2001.

As a resultreceipt of the sale of Dialog Server, we will forgo future revenue opportunities but will significantly reduce expenses. Historical revenues and expenses, in thousands of dollars, for the Dialog Server Product line were as follows:

   

2001


  

2000


Revenues

  

$

275

  

$

740

Cost of revenues

  

 

99

  

 

378

Research and development

  

 

606

  

 

1,861

Sales and marketing

  

 

566

  

 

2,088

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income increased in 2001 to $0.2 million from $0.1 million in 2000. The increase is due to the additional cash generated by the sale of the Dialog Server product line. Funds held in escrow as a result of the

the sale of the Dialog Server product, $0.6 million, net of fees, as of December 31, 2001, were receivedfunds in May 2002 and recordedwas recognized as other income in the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

The income tax provision recorded in fiscal 2001 of $4.2 million is comprised of the following: tax on the gain from the sale of the Dialog Server product of $1.7 million, the change in valuation allowance of $3.3 million to reduce net deferred tax assets based on management’s assessment of the uncertainty of the realizability of such assets and the provision for foreign taxes of $0.2 million offset by the utilization of net operating losses of $1.0 million. In 2000 there was no benefit for income taxes recorded as a result of the pretax losses generated during the year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We have has incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations in prior periods. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we incurred a net loss of $0.5 million and used $0.1 million cash in operations. For the year ended December 31, 2001, we incurred a net loss of $1.9 million, but generated positive cash flows from operating activities of $0.9 million as a result of the sale of the Dialog Server product and other cost reduction measures. For the year ended December 31, 2000, we incurred negative cash flows from operations of $6.9 million. We may incur additional operating losses and negative cash flows in the future. Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital or reduce spending could adversely affect our ability to achieve our intended business objectives. We currently have no plans to fund our business with cash from sources other than operations and its existing cash and cash equivalents. A substantial portion of our annual revenues are realized during the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. We believe that this is caused by its customers’ spending and budget patterns. This seasonality causes variability in our working capital needs during the year, however, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and availability under our line of credit are sufficient to manage this variability.

At December 31, 2002,2003, we had cash and cash equivalents of $7.5$16.0 million, compared to $8.3$7.5 million at December 31, 2001.2002. On February 1, 2004, we completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding capital of Context for approximately $5.2 million in cash derived from our existing cash and cash equivalents.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.9 million in 2003 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $0.1 million in 2002. The net cash provided by operating activities in 2003 was primarily attributable to net income of $2.6 million, depreciation and amortization of $2.7 million and a decrease in accounts receivable of $1.0 million. In addtion, the tax benefit we received from stock option exercises had a positive effect on our net cash used in operating activities and could continue to have a positive effect if stock options continue to be exercised. The net cash used in operating activities in 2002 was largely due to the payment of Merger costs, and increased accounts receivable, offset by an increase in deferred revenue.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2003 was $0.5 million and $0.9 million in 2002. Net cash used in investing activities in 2003 was exclusively for additions to property and equipment and is consistent with our expected rate of capital expenditures in the short-term. Net cash used in investing activities in 2002 included direct costs of the Merger of $1.6 million and purchases of property and equipment of $0.4 million, partially offset by proceeds from the Dialog Server escrow account of $0.6 million and cash received in the Merger of $0.6 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2003 was $2.9 million and $47,000 in 2002. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2003 consisted of $4.7 million of proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and $0.3 million of proceeds from the sale of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan, offset by discretionary principal repayments totaling $2.1 million against our line of credit. Net cash provided by financing

activities in 2002 consisted of $124,000 of proceeds from the sale of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan, offset by $77,000 of issuance costs for common stock issued in the Merger. In the future, we expect to generate further net cash from financing activities from the sale of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options.

 

In connection with the merger,Merger, we assumed a line of credit with a bank. On the mergereffective date of the Merger, July 31, 2002, and on December 31, 2002, the outstanding principal balance was $2.1 million. On December 31, 2003, there was no outstanding principal balance. Borrowings under the line of credit are limited to the greater of $3.0 million or 80% of eligible accounts receivable. OutstandingAny outstanding balances under the line of credit would bear interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 0.5%. All of our assets collateralize the line of credit. In August 2003, we extended the term of our line of credit, facility.which is now scheduled to expire in August 2004. The line of credit expires in August 2003. Pursuant to the terms of the line of credit, we are restrictedrestricts us from paying dividends on our common stock. The line of credit also includes various financial covenants related to our operating results. As of December 31, 2003, we were in compliance with all loan covenants. We expect to renew the line of credit prior to its expiration, however, there is no assurance that we will be able to do so under comparable terms or at all.

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $0.1 million in 2002 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $0.9 million in 2001. The net cash used in operating activities in 2002 was largely due to the payment of merger costs, increased accounts receivable and deferred revenue and net changes to other components of working capital. The net cash provided by operating activities in 2001 was primarily due to a reduction in operating expenses together with favorable net changes in working capital. As of December 31, 2002, we believe that cash payments of certain professional fees and related transaction costs associated with the recently completed merger and costs related to integration activities are substantially complete.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2002 was $0.9 million, including direct costs of the merger and purchases of property and equipment, partially off set by proceeds from the Dialog Server escrow account and cash received in the merger. This compares to net cash provided by investing activities of $5.1 million in 2001

which included proceeds from net sales of marketable investments and the sale of the Dialog Server product line that were partially off set by purchases of property and equipment. We do not anticipate that there will be substantial cash used or generated from investing activities for the short-term.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $47,000 for 2002 and $0.2 million for 2001, primarily from purchases of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan and from the proceeds from exercises of employee stock options. We expect that cash provided from financing activities, primarily semi-annual sales of stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, will be comparable to that of recent periods in the short-term.

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, on hand, as well as expected cash flows from operations and the line of credit. Although transactionWe may also continue to receive and integration expenses associated withuse proceeds from the recently completed merger have reduced cash, wesale of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. We may, however, seek additional equity or debt financing to fund further expansion. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available at all or that it, if available, will be obtainable on terms favorable to us and would not be dilutive.or at all.

 

We had purchase orders outstanding at December 31, 2003 related to purchases of digital scanners for resale. We have also entered into various operating leases for our facilities and sales offices, which as of December 31, 2002 expiredexpire at various dates through 2007.2009. We have entered into capital leases for certain of our property and equipment which expire in 2004. Future purchase order obligations and future minimum lease commitments at December 31, 20022003 due under these non-cancelable operating and capital leases are as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

      Payments due by period

   

Contractual Obligations


  Total

  Less
than 1
year


  1 – 3
years


  3 –5
years


  More
than 5
years


Operating Lease Obligations

  $8,257  $1,857  $3,040  $2,644  $716

Capital Lease Obligations

  $62  $62         

Purchase Order Obligations

  $417  $417         

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

   

Operating

Leases


  

Capital

Leases


 

Year ending December 31,

         

2003

  

 

2,441

  

 

62

 

2004

  

 

1,327

  

 

62

 

2005

  

 

201

  

 

—  

 

2006

  

 

127

  

 

—  

 

2007

  

 

30

  

 

—  

 

   

  


Total minimum lease payments

  

$

4,126

  

 

124

 

   

     

Less amount representing interest

      

 

(4

)

       


Total present value of minimum payments

      

 

120

 

Less current portion

      

 

(60

)

       


Non-current portion

      

$

60

 

       


We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Regulation S-K 303(a)(4)(ii).

In January 2003, we extended the term of a facility lease to January 2009 at a reduced rental rate. As of the date of the amendment, our future minimum lease commitments due under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

   

Operating

Leases


Year ending December 31,

    

2003

  

 

2,202

2004

  

 

1,074

2005

  

 

726

2006

  

 

737

2007

  

 

655

Thereafter

  

 

695

   

Total minimum lease payments

  

$

6,089

   

Summarized Quarterly Data (Unaudited)

 

The following tables present unaudited quarterly financial information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2002. We believe this2003. This information reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, except for mergerMerger costs of $2.1 million and a write-off of in-process research and development of $0.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2002) that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of suchthis information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period. (in thousands, except per share data):

 

  

1st Quarter


   

2nd Quarter


   

3rd Quarter


   

4th Quarter


2002

            
  1st Quarter

  2nd Quarter

  3rd Quarter

 4th Quarter

2003

         

Net revenues

  $12,604  $13,882  $14,517  $16,142

Gross profit

   8,049   8,570   9,286   10,609

Operating income

   144   488   1,212   1,831

Net income

   82   301   706   1,498

Basic net income per share (1)

  $0.01  $0.03  $0.07  $0.14

Diluted net income per share (1)

  $0.01  $0.03  $0.06  $0.12

2002(2)

         

Net revenues

  

$

5,792

 

  

$

5,708

 

  

$

10,663

 

  

$

13,440

  $5,792  $5,708  $10,663  $13,440

Gross profit

  

 

4,727

 

  

 

4,608

 

  

 

7,839

 

  

 

8,942

   4,727   4,608   7,839   8,942

Operating income (loss)

  

 

4

 

  

 

108

 

  

 

(1,859

)

  

 

879

   4   108   (1,859)  879

Net income (loss)

  

 

17

 

  

 

790

 

  

 

(1,881

)

  

 

542

   17   790   (1,881)  542

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share(1)

  

$

0.00

 

  

$

0.18

 

  

$

(0.26

)

  

$

0.06

2001

            

Net revenues

  

$

6,595

 

  

$

4,863

 

  

$

4,694

 

  

$

5,883

Gross profit

  

 

5,426

 

  

 

3,794

 

  

 

3,586

 

  

 

4,859

Operating income (loss)

  

 

(350

)

  

 

(1,456

)

  

 

(1,065

)

  

 

320

Net income (loss)

  

 

(315

)

  

 

(436

)

  

 

(1,471

)

  

 

307

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share(1)

  

$

(0.07

)

  

$

(0.10

)

  

$

(0.34

)

  

$

0.07

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (1)

  $0.00  $0.18  $(0.26) $0.06

(1)Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share computations for each quarter are independent and do not add up to the net loss per share computation for the respective year. See Note 31 of the Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of the determination of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share.

 

(2)The results of operations of Old Captiva are included in the year ended December 31, 2002 only from August 1, 2002 in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The first quarter of each year is generally our weakest quarter of the year and our fourth quarter of each year is generally our strongest quarter of the year.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskRisk.

We have significant foreign operations and, as a result, are subject to various risks, including, foreign currency risks. We have not entered into foreign currency contracts for purposes of hedging or speculation. To date, we have not realized any significant gain or loss from transactions denominated in foreign currencies. For the year ended December 31, 2002, approximately 25% of our sales were denominated in currencies other than our functional currency, the United States dollar. These foreign currencies are primarily British pounds, Euros and the Australian dollar. Additionally, substantially all of the receivables and payables of our foreign subsidiaries are denominated in currencies other than our functional currency.

 

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to itsour investment portfolio and its line of credit.portfolio. We maintain an investment policy whichthat is intended to ensure the safety and preservation of itsour invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. We do not currently use, nor have we historically used, derivative financial instruments to manage or reduce market risk. We mitigate default risk for our investments by investing in high credit quality securities such as debt instruments of the United States government and its agencies and high quality corporate issuers, as well as money market funds. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity and maintains a prudent amount of diversification. As of December 31, 2002,2003, we had approximately $7.5$16.0 million in cash and cash equivalents. On February 1, 2004, we completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding capital of Context for approximately $5.2 million in cash derived from our existing cash and cash equivalents.

 

We have significant international operations and, as a result, are subject to various risks, including, foreign currency risks. We have not entered into foreign currency contracts for purposes of hedging or speculation. To date, we have not realized any significant gain or loss from transactions denominated in foreign currencies. For

the year ended December 31, 2003, approximately 21% of our sales and approximately 15% of our operating expenses were denominated in currencies other than our functional currency, the United States dollar. These foreign currencies are primarily British pounds, Euros and Australian dollars. Additionally, substantially all of the receivables and payables of our international subsidiaries are denominated in their respective local currencies.

 

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002,2003, and the Report of Independent Accountants,Auditors, are included in this Report on pages F-1 through F-18.

 

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

PART III

 

Item 10.9A.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information required by this item will be set forth under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Executive Officers” in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the heading “Executive Compensation.”

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Information about our equity compensation plans at December 31, 2002 was as follows (000s omitted):

Plan Category


    

Number of Shares

to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options


    

Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options


    

Number of Shares Remaining for Future Issuance


Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

    

4,894

    

$

2.88

    

797

For more information on our equity compensation plans, see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. The table above includes approximately 108,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to our 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement under the heading “Certain Transactions.”

Item 14.

Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

 

We maintain controls and procedures, which have been designed to ensure that material information related to Captiva Software Corporation, including ourits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to management on a timely and consistent basis. In response to recent legislation and proposed regulations, we have been reviewing itsour internal control structure and hashave established a disclosure committee, which consists of certain members of our management. Although we believe our existing disclosure controls and procedures are adequate to enable us to comply with its currentour disclosure obligations, the review and documentation of our internal control structure is a process that will continue in conjunction with other integration activities.to evolve.

 

After the formationAs of the disclosure committee and within 90 days prior toend of the filing ofperiod covered by this Annual Report,report, the disclosure committee carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Bish, and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Russo, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation,

Mr. Bish and Mr. Russo concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in causing material information relating to us to be collected, communicated and analyzed by management on a timely basis and to ensure that our public disclosures aredisclosed in a timely filed and complymanner in compliance with SEC disclosure obligations.

 

Changes in Controls and Procedures

 

There werewas no significant changeschange in our internal controls that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter in the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or in other factors that could significantlyis reasonably likely to affect, theseour internal controls afterover financial reporting.

PART III

Some information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the dateSecurities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for our most recent evaluation.

2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Proxy Statement).

Item 10.Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Election of Directors” and “Executive Officers” in the Proxy Statement.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section in the Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers.”

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information relating to the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” in the Proxy Statement.

Information about our equity compensation plans at December 31, 2003 was as follows:

Plan Category  Number of Shares to
be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options
  Number of
Shares
Remaining
for Future
Issuance
 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

  1,001,586  $4.12  662,254(1)

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders (2), (3)

  705,258  $7.48  314,326 

(1)Includes 109,413 shares reserved for issuance pursuant to our 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1998 ESPP). Our 1998 ESPP contains a provision under which the total number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1998 ESPP is restored to 300,000 on January 1 of each year.

(2)Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders consist of our 1999 Stock Plan (the 1999 Plan) and our 2003 New Executive Recruitment Stock Option Plan (the 2003 Plan).

The 1999 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 700,000 shares of common stock over the term of the 1999 Plan, pursuant to the grant of non-qualified stock options and the direct issuance of shares to eligible employees and independent consultants.

The 2003 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of common stock over the term of the 2003 Plan, pursuant to the grant of non-qualified stock options and the direct issuance of shares to eligible employees.

(3)

Replacement options issued and outstanding under the 1994 Captiva Software Corporation Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and the Captiva 2002 Equity Incentive Plan were not included in equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders. In connection with the Merger with Old Captiva in July 2002, we assumed all options then outstanding under the 1994 Captiva Software Corporation Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and the Captiva 2002 Equity Incentive Plan of Old Captiva and issued new options to purchase shares of our common stock in replacement for all outstanding options to purchase common stock

of Old Captiva under such plans. By virtue of the Merger, the Old Captiva options were proportionally adjusted with respect to exercise prices and the number of shares subject to each option based on the exchange ratio used in the Merger. All other terms of the Old Captiva options, such as vesting schedules, remained unchanged. We have not and will not make future grants under either of the Old Captiva plans subsequent to the Merger. At December 31, 2003, there were 18,258 shares reserved for issuance pursuant to options outstanding under the 1994 Captiva Software Corporation Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan with a weighted average exercise price of $1.56 per share and 1,742,472 shares reserved for issuance pursuant to options outstanding under the Captiva 2002 Equity Incentive Plan with a weighted average exercise price of $1.82 per share.

For more information on our equity compensation plans, see Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Proxy Statement.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditors” in the Proxy Statement.

PART IV

 

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

 

   

Page
Number



(a)

Documents filed as part of the report:

   

(1)     Financial Statements

   

(1)

Report of Independent AccountantsAuditors

  

F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20022003 and 20012002

  

F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001

  

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and OtherTotal Comprehensive Income (Loss) for 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001

  

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001

  

F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  

F-6

(2)     Financial Statement Schedule

   

Schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

  

II-1

 

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

 

(2)(3)    Exhibits

The exhibits listed below are required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K. Each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K has been identified.

 

Exhibit
Number



  

Description of Document


  2.1*

  

Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated March 4, 2002 by and among the registrant, Condor Merger Corp. and Captiva Software Corporation.

  2.2*

+
  

Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated April 16,26, 2002 by and among the registrant, Condor Merger Corp. and Captiva Software Corporation.

  3.1**

  

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant.

  3.2*+Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant.

  3.2***

Exhibit
Number


  

Description of Document


  3.3*+++Amended and Restated Bylaws of the registrant.

  4.1

  

Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.

  4.2**

  

Form of Investor Rights Agreement dated August 27, 1993 by and among the registrant and the investors identified therein.

  4.3+

  

Rights Agreement dated September 9, 1997.

1997 between the registrant and Bank Boston, N.A.

  4.4++

  

Amendment to Rights Agreement dated October 5, 2001 by and among the registrant, Fleet National Bank, formerly known as Bank Boston, N.A., and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.

  4.5*

  

Second Amendment to Rights Agreement dated March 4, 2002 between the registrant and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.

10.1**

  

Form of indemnification agreement entered into between the registrant and its directors and executive officers.

10.2**

  

Form of theThe registrant’s Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan.

(A)

10.3†††

10.3+++
  

Form of theThe registrant’s 1999 Stock Plan.

(A)

10.4†††

10.4*+++
  

Form of theThe registrant’s Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

(A)

10.5*

+++
  

Form of proposed Amended and Restated 1998 EmployeeThe registrant’s 2003 New Executive Recruitment Stock PurchaseOption Plan.

(A)

10.6†††

10.6++
  

Form of Severance Agreement between the registrant and certain of its executive officers.

(A)

10.7††

10.7++
  

Form of Severance Agreement between the registrant and certain of its executive officers in connection with the mergerMerger of the registrant and Captiva Software Corporation.

(A)

Exhibit Number


10.14*+  

Description of Document


10.12*†

Employment offer letter from ActionPoint, Inc. to Rick Russo dated March 4, 2002.

10.13*†

Employment offer letter from ActionPoint, Inc. to Reynolds Bish dated March 4, 2002.

10.14*†

Amendment No. 1 to the registrant’s Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan.

(A)

10.15†††

10.15*+++
  

TheAmendment No. 2 to the registrant’s leaseAmended and Restated 1993 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan. (A)

10.16*+++Lease dated January 12, 2004 between CA-Metro Plaza Limited Partnership and the registrant for property at 1299 Parkmoor Ave.,25 Metro Drive, San Jose, CA.

23.1*††

10.17*+++
  

Amended Employment Agreement for Rick Russo dated August 1, 2003. (A)

10.18*+++Amended Employment Agreement for Reynolds Bish dated August 1, 2003. (A)
10.19*+++Amended Employment Agreement for Bradford Weller dated August 1, 2003. (A)
10.20*+++Amended Employment Agreement for Steven Burton dated August 1, 2003. (A)
10.21*+++Amended Employment Agreement for Blaine Owens dated August 1, 2003. (A)
10.22*+++Amended Employment Agreement for James Vickers dated August 1, 2003. (A)
10.23*+++Employment Agreement for Jim Nicol dated September 14, 2003. (A)
10.24*+++Employment Agreement for Howard Dratler dated November 24, 2003. (A)
23.1*+++Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants.

24.1

  

Power of Attorney. Reference is made to page 40.

43.

99.1*††

31.1*+++
  

Certification

by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).

99.2*††

31.2*+++
  

Certification

by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).
32.1*+++Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*+++Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


**Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed on March 20, 2002.
**Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1, as amended (Registration No. 33-66142).
***Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed on September 24, 1997.
+Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the registrant’s registration statement on Form 8-A filed on September 10, 1997. (Registration No. 000-22292)
††++Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 29, 2002.
†††+++Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K filed on April 2, 2001.
*†*+Incorporated by reference to an exhibit or an annex to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-87106).
*††++Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2003.
 *+++Filed HerewithHerewith.
(A)Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

(b)

We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on October 28, 2003 to furnish our disclosure of unaudited financial information for the third quarter of 2003.

(c) Exhibits

Refer to Item 15(a)(3) above.

(d) Financial Statement Schedules

Refer to Item 15(a)(2) above.

Reports on Form 8-K:

none

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: March 26, 200315, 2004

 

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

Captiva Software Corporation

By:

 

/s/ REYNOLDSReynolds C. BISH        Bish


  

Reynolds C. Bish

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Reynolds C. Bish and/or Rick Russo, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their or his substitute or substituted, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature


  

Title


 

Date


/s/    REYNOLDS C. BISH        


Reynolds C. Bish

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

March 26, 2003

/s/ RICK RUSSO        Reynolds C. Bish


Rick Russo

  Chief Executive Officer,March 15, 2004
Reynolds C. BishPresident and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Rick Russo


Chief Financial Officer (PrincipalMarch 15, 2004
Rick Russo(Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

March 26, 2003

/s/ KIMRA D. HAWLEY        Patrick Edsell


Kimra D. Hawley

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

March 26, 2003

15, 2004
Patrick Edsell

/s/ JAMES BERGLUND        


James Berglund


  

Director

 

March 26, 2003

15, 2004
James Berglund

/s/ PATRICK EDSELL        Mel S. Lavitt


Patrick Edsell

  

Director

 

March 26, 2003

15, 2004
Mel S. Lavitt

/s/ STEPHEN S. FRANCIS        Jeffrey Lenches


Stephen S. Francis

  

Director

 

March 26, 2003

15, 2004
Jeffrey Lenches

/s/ MEL S. LAVITT        Bruce Silver


Mel S. Lavitt

  

Director

 

March 26, 2003

15, 2004

/s/    BRUCE SILVER        


Bruce Silver

  

Director

 

March 26, 2003

CERTIFICATION

I, Reynolds C. Bish, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Captiva Software Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:    March 26, 2003

/s/    REYNOLDS C. BISH


Reynolds C. Bish

Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION

I, Rick E. Russo, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Captiva Software Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:    March 26, 2003

/s/    RICK E. RUSSO


Rick E. Russo

Chief Financial Officer

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTSAUDITORS

 

TheTo the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Captiva Software CorporationCorporation:

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Captiva Software Corporation formerly known as ActionPoint, Inc., and its subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 20022003 and 2001,2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20022003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Diego, California

March 20, 2003February 27, 2004

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

   

December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


 
   

(in thousands, except share and
per share data)

 

ASSETS

          

Current assets:

          

Cash and cash equivalents

  

$

7,453

 

  

$

8,325

 

Accounts receivable, net

  

 

11,764

 

  

 

4,845

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  

 

2,564

 

  

 

935

 

   


  


Total current assets

  

 

21,781

 

  

 

14,105

 

Property and equipment, net

  

 

1,014

 

  

 

808

 

Other assets

  

 

402

 

  

 

415

 

Goodwill

  

 

6,082

 

  

 

—  

 

Other intangible assets, net

  

 

5,857

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


Total assets

  

$

35,136

 

  

$

15,328

 

   


  


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

          

Current liabilities:

          

Accounts payable

  

$

699

 

  

$

440

 

Deferred revenue

  

 

10,371

 

  

 

3,400

 

Accrued compensation and related liabilities

  

 

2,914

 

  

 

982

 

Other liabilities

  

 

4,439

 

  

 

1,184

 

Line of credit

  

 

2,145

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


Total current liabilities

  

 

20,568

 

  

 

6,006

 

Deferred revenue

  

 

956

 

  

 

989

 

Other liabilities

  

 

521

 

  

 

176

 

Commitments (see notes 5 and 6)

          

Stockholders’ equity:

          

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 8,860,000 and 4,375,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively

  

 

89

 

  

 

44

 

Additional paid in capital

  

 

15,499

 

  

 

10,130

 

Accumulated deficit

  

 

(2,549

)

  

 

(2,017

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  

 

52

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


Total stockholders’ equity

  

 

13,091

 

  

 

8,157

 

   


  


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  

$

35,136

 

  

$

15,328

 

   


  


   December 31,

 
   2003

  2002

 

ASSETS

         

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $16,038  $7,453 

Accounts receivable, net

   10,780   11,764 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   3,314   2,564 
   

  


Total current assets

   30,132   21,781 

Property and equipment, net

   924   1,014 

Other assets

   2,354   402 

Goodwill

   6,082   6,082 

Other intangible assets, net

   3,762   5,857 
   

  


Total assets

  $43,254  $35,136 
   

  


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

         

Current liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

  $891  $699 

Accrued compensation and related liabilities

   2,793   2,914 

Other liabilities

   3,166   4,439 

Line of credit

   —     2,145 

Deferred revenue

   11,264   10,371 
   

  


Total current liabilities

   18,114   20,568 

Deferred revenue

   519   956 

Other liabilities

   235   521 

Commitments (see notes 4 and 5)

         

Stockholders’ equity:

         

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding

   —     —   

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 10,790,000 and 8,860,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively

   108   89 

Additional paid-in capital

   24,171   15,499 

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

   38   (2,549)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   69   52 
   

  


Total stockholders’ equity

   24,386   13,091 
   

  


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $43,254  $35,136 
   

  


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 
   

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Net revenues:

               

Software licenses

  

$

20,164

 

  

$

14,975

 

  

$

19,040

 

Services and other

  

 

15,440

 

  

 

7,060

 

  

 

6,002

 

   


  


  


Total revenues

  

 

35,604

 

  

 

22,035

 

  

 

25,042

 

Cost of revenues:

               

Software licenses

  

 

1,152

 

  

 

885

 

  

 

525

 

Services and other

  

 

7,364

 

  

 

3,483

 

  

 

4,736

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

  

 

972

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


Total cost of revenues

  

 

9,488

 

  

 

4,368

 

  

 

5,261

 

   


  


  


Gross profit

  

 

26,116

 

  

 

17,667

 

  

 

19,781

 

   


  


  


Operating expenses:

               

Research and development

  

 

5,924

 

  

 

4,923

 

  

 

7,014

 

Sales and marketing

  

 

13,729

 

  

 

12,045

 

  

 

16,437

 

General and administrative

  

 

4,327

 

  

 

3,250

 

  

 

4,683

 

Merger costs

  

 

2,148

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Write-off of in-process research and development

  

 

856

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


Total operating expenses

  

 

26,984

 

  

 

20,218

 

  

 

28,134

 

   


  


  


Loss from operations

  

 

(868

)

  

 

(2,551

)

  

 

(8,353

)

Other income (expense):

               

Interest and other income, net

  

 

16

 

  

 

239

 

  

 

95

 

Gain on sale of Dialog Server

  

 

608

 

  

 

4,612

 

  

 

—  

 

Write-off of minority investment

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(500

)

   


  


  


Income (loss) before income taxes

  

 

(244

)

  

 

2,300

 

  

 

(8,758

)

Provision for income taxes

  

 

288

 

  

 

4,215

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


Net loss

  

$

(532

)

  

$

(1,915

)

  

$

(8,758

)

   


  


  


Basic and diluted net loss per share

  

$

(0.09

)

  

$

(0.45

)

  

$

(2.09

)

   


  


  


Basic and diluted common equivalent shares

  

 

6,242

 

  

 

4,300

 

  

 

4,190

 

   


  


  


   

Year Ended

December 31,


 
   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Net revenues:

             

Software

  $27,006  $20,346  $14,975 

Services

   22,724   14,087   7,060 

Hardware and other

   7,415   1,171   —   
   


 


 


Total revenues

   57,145   35,604   22,035 

Cost of revenues:

             

Software

   2,631   1,309   885 

Services

   9,936   6,311   3,483 

Hardware and other

   5,969   896   —   

Amortization of purchased intangibles

   2,095   972   —   
   


 


 


Total cost of revenues

   20,631   9,488   4,368 
   


 


 


Gross profit

   36,514   26,116   17,667 
   


 


 


Operating expenses:

             

Research and development

   8,979   5,924   4,923 

Sales and marketing

   17,816   13,729   12,045 

General and administrative

   6,102   4,327   3,250 

Merger costs

   (58)  2,148   —   

Write-off of in-process research and development

   —     856   —   
   


 


 


Total operating expenses

   32,839   26,984   20,218 
   


 


 


Income (loss) from operations

   3,675   (868)  (2,551)

Other income (expense):

             

Interest and other income, net

   74   16   239 

Gain on sale of Dialog Server

   —     608   4,612 
   


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

   3,749   (244)  2,300 

Provision for income taxes

   1,162   288   4,215 
   


 


 


Net income (loss)

  $2,587  $(532) $(1,915)
   


 


 


Basic net income (loss) per share

  $0.27  $(0.09) $(0.45)
   


 


 


Diluted net income (loss) per share

  $0.23  $(0.09) $(0.45)
   


 


 


Basic common equivalent shares

   9,484   6,242   4,300 
   


 


 


Diluted common equivalent shares

   11,234   6,242   4,300 
   


 


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND OTHER

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

    

Preferred Stock


  

Common Stock


  

Additional paid in capital


  

Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)


     

Accumulated other comprehensive income


  

Total stockholders’ equity


     

Other comprehensive income


 
    

Number of Shares


  

Amount


  

Number of Shares


  

Amount


              Preferred Stock

  Common Stock

  

Additional

Paid-in

Capital


  

Retained

Earnings

(Accumulated

Deficit)


  

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Income


  

Total

Stockholders’

Equity


 
    

(in thousands, except per share data)

   

Number of

Shares


  Amount

  

Number of

Shares


  Amount

     

Balance at December 31, 1999

    

  

$

 —

  

4,076

  

$

41

  

$

8,681

  

$

8,656

 

    

$

 —

  

$

17,378

 

    

$

   —

 

Balance at December 31, 2000

  —    $—    4,274  $43  $9,981  $(102) $—    $9,922 

Common stock issued under:

                                                      

Stock option plans

          

85

  

 

1

  

 

596

          

 

597

 

             1   —     6      6 

Employee stock purchase plan

          

88

  

 

1

  

 

282

          

 

283

 

             100   1   143      144 

Stock related bonus plan

          

25

  

 

  

 

362

          

 

362

 

     

Stock-based compensation

                

 

60

          

 

60

 

     

Comprehensive loss:

                     

Net loss

                   

 

(8,758

)

       

 

(8,758

)

    

 

(8,758

)

                  (1,915)    (1,915)
    
  

  
  

  

  


    

  


    


                    


Balance at December 31, 2000

    

  

 

  

4,274

  

 

43

  

 

9,981

  

 

(102

)

    

 

  

 

9,922

 

    

 

(8,758

)

Total comprehensive loss

                     (1,915)
  
  

  
  

  

  


 

  


Balance at December 31, 2001

  —     —    4,375   44   10,130   (2,017)  —     8,157 

Common stock issued under:

                     

Employee stock purchase plan

        92   1   123      124 

Shares issued in conjunction with merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

        4,393   44   5,246      5,290 

Comprehensive income (loss):

                     

Equity adjustment from foreign currencies

                   52   52 

Net loss

                  (532)    (532)
                    


Total comprehensive loss

                     (480)
  
  

  
  

  

  


 

  


Balance at December 31, 2002

  —     —    8,860   89   15,499   (2,549)  52   13,091 

Common stock issued under:

                                                      

Stock option plans

          

1

  

 

  

 

6

          

 

6

 

             1,733   17   4,723      4,740 

Employee stock purchase plan

          

100

  

 

1

  

 

143

          

 

144

 

             191   2   308      310 

Net loss

                   

 

(1,915

)

       

 

(1,915

)

    

 

(1,915

)

    
  

  
  

  

  


    

  


    


Balance at December 31, 2001

    

  

 

  

4,375

  

 

44

  

 

10,130

  

 

(2,017

)

    

 

  

 

8,157

 

    

 

(1,915

)

Common stock issued under:

                                 

Employee stock purchase plan

          

92

  

 

1

  

 

123

          

 

124

 

     

Shares issued in conjunction with merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

          

4,393

  

 

44

  

 

5,246

          

 

5,290

 

     

Warrants

        6   —     —        —   

Tax benefit of stock option exercises

               3,641      3,641 

Comprehensive income:

                     

Equity adjustment from foreign currencies

                        

 

52

  

 

52

 

    

 

52

 

                   17   17 

Net income

                   

 

(532

)

    

 

  

 

(532

)

    

 

(532

)

                  2,587     2,587 
    
  

  
  

  

  


    

  


    


                    


Balance at December 31, 2002

    

  

$

  

8,860

  

$

89

  

$

15,499

  

$

(2,549

)

    

$

52

  

$

13,091

 

    

$

(480

)

Total comprehensive income

                     2,604 
    
  

  
  

  

  


    

  


    


  
  

  
  

  

  


 

  


Balance at December 31, 2003

  —    $—    10,790  $108  $24,171  $38  $69  $24,386 
  
  

  
  

  

  


 

  


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 
   

(in thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

               

Net loss

  

$

(532

)

  

$

(1,915

)

  

$

(8,758

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

               

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

1,608

 

  

 

763

 

  

 

815

 

Write-off of in-process research and development

  

 

856

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Deferred income taxes

  

 

(721

)

  

 

1,664

 

  

 

895

 

Net gain on sale of Dialog Server Product line

  

 

(608

)

  

 

(2,278

)

  

 

—  

 

Non-cash merger costs

  

 

471

 

          

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

  

 

—  

 

  

 

25

 

  

 

—  

 

Write-off of minority investment

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

500

 

Stock-based compensation

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

422

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

               

Accounts receivable

  

 

(3,081

)

  

 

3,067

 

  

 

(2,612

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  

 

(847

)

  

 

695

 

  

 

(251

)

Accounts payable

  

 

(2,195

)

  

 

26

 

  

 

(100

)

Deferred revenue

  

 

2,966

 

  

 

443

 

  

 

2,005

 

Accrued compensation and related liabilities

  

 

1,932

 

  

 

(1,073

)

  

 

838

 

Other liabilities

  

 

71

 

  

 

(558

)

  

 

(664

)

   


  


  


Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  

 

(80

)

  

 

859

 

  

 

(6,910

)

   


  


  


Cash flows from investing activities:

               

Sales of marketable investments, net

  

 

—  

 

  

 

4,299

 

  

 

—  

 

Purchases of property and equipment

  

 

(422

)

  

 

(112

)

  

 

(921

)

Investment in patents

  

 

(92

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Proceeds from sale of Dialog Server product line

  

 

608

 

  

 

887

 

  

 

—  

 

Direct costs of merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

  

 

(1,581

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Cash received in the merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

  

 

583

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  

 

(904

)

  

 

5,074

 

  

 

(921

)

   


  


  


Cash flows from financing activities:

               

Issuance costs for common stock issued in the merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

  

 

(77

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  

 

124

 

  

 

150

 

  

 

880

 

   


  


  


Net cash provided by financing activities

  

 

47

 

  

 

150

 

  

 

880

 

   


  


  


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

  

 

65

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  

 

(872

)

  

 

6,083

 

  

 

(6,951

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  

 

8,325

 

  

 

2,242

 

  

 

9,193

 

   


  


  


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  

$

7,453

 

  

$

8,325

 

  

$

2,242

 

   


  


  


Supplemental information:

               

Common stock issued in conjunction with merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

  

$

5,367

 

  

$

—  

 

  

$

—  

 

   


  


  


Equipment acquired under capital lease obligations

  

$

122

 

  

$

—  

 

  

$

—  

 

   


  


  


Cash paid (received) for taxes

  

$

—  

 

  

$

(410

)

  

$

36

 

   


  


  


   

Year Ended

December 31,


 
   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

             

Net income (loss)

  $2,587  $(532) $(1,915)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

             

Depreciation and amortization

   2,702   1,608   763 

Tax benefit of stock option exercises

   3,641         

Deferred income taxes

   (2,177)  (721)  1,664 

Write-off of in-process research and development

   —     856   —   

Net gain on sale of Dialog Server product line

   —     (608)  (2,278)

Non-cash merger costs

   —     471     

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

   —     —     25 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition in 2002:

             

Accounts receivable, net

   984   (3,081)  3,067 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   (921)  (847)  695 

Accounts payable

   192   (2,195)  26 

Deferred revenue

   456   2,966   443 

Accrued compensation and related liabilities

   (121)  1,932   (1,073)

Other liabilities

   (1,441)  71   (558)
   


 


 


Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   5,902   (80)  859 
   


 


 


Cash flows from investing activities:

             

Sales of marketable investments, net

   —     —     4,299 

Purchases of property and equipment

   (517)  (422)  (112)

Investment in patents

   —     (92)  —   

Proceeds from sale of Dialog Server product line

   —     608   887 

Direct costs of merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

   —     (1,581)  —   

Cash received in the merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

   —     583   —   
   


 


 


Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   (517)  (904)  5,074 
   


 


 


Cash flows from financing activities:

             

Issuance costs for common stock issued in the merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

   —     (77)  —   

Payments on line of credit

   (2,145)  —     —   

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   5,050   124   150 
   


 


 


Net cash provided by financing activities

   2,905   47   150 
   


 


 


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

   295   65   —   

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   8,585   (872)  6,083 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   7,453   8,325   2,242 
   


 


 


Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $16,038  $7,453  $8,325 
   


 


 


Supplemental information:

             

Common stock issued in conjunction with merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation

  $—    $5,367  $—   
   


 


 


Equipment acquired under capital lease obligations

  $—    $122  $—   
   


 


 


Cash paid (received) for taxes

  $173  $—    $(410)
   


 


 


 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statementsstatements.

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.    Nature of BusinessThe Company and Liquidity:its Significant Accounting Policies

 

The Company:

 

Captiva Software Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) develops, markets, and services input management software that helps automate and manage the capture of external information into an organization’s internal computing systems. The Company was incorporated in California in January 1986 and was reincorporated in Delaware in September 1993.

Liquidity and capital resources:

The Company has incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations in prior periods. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company incurred a net loss of $0.5 million and used $0.1 million cash in operations. Included in this result is payment of merger costs of $0.8 million, which is expected to be non-recurring. For the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company incurred a net loss of $1.9 million, but generated positive cash flows from operating activities of $0.9 million as a result of the sale of the Dialog Server product line and other cost reduction measures. Included in this result are $1.2 million in operating expenses from our Dialog Server business, which was sold in May 2001. For the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company incurred negative cash flows from operations of $6.9 million. Included in this result are $3.9 million in operating expenses from our Dialog Server business, which was sold in May 2001. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $7.5 million and an accumulated deficit of $2.5 million. The Company may incur additional operating losses and negative cash flows in the future. Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital or reduce spending could adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its intended business objectives.

Although transaction and integration expenses associated with the recently completed merger have reduced cash, the Company believes that its cash, cash equivalents and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company’s liquidity and capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. In the event that existing funds are not sufficient to meet the Company’s obligations, the Company may need to seek additional financing. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available or will be available on terms acceptable to the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

2.    Merger of ActionPoint and Captiva Software:

On July 31, 2002, the Company completed the merger with privately-held Captiva Software Corporation, or Old Captiva, of San Diego, California. Old Captiva was a provider of forms information capture software and related services. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company exchanged all of Old Captiva’s outstanding common stock for 4.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock and 2.2 million replacement options to purchase common stock, of which 772,000 options were vested and the issuance of warrants to purchase approximately 8,000 shares of common stock. The 2.2 million options to purchase common stock have exercise prices ranging from $0.52 to $2.43 per share and a weighted-average exercise price of $1.94 per share. The warrants to purchase common stock have an exercise price of $2.43 per share.

The merger was accounted for as a purchase. The fair value of the Company’s common stock issued in the merger of $1.11 per share was determined based on the average closing price three days prior to the completion date of the merger. The fair value of the vested replacement options and the warrants to purchase common stock were estimated based on a Black-Scholes model utilizing the following assumptions: fair value of common stock of $1.11 per share, expected term of 2 years, expected volatility of 90%, expected dividend yield of 0% and a risk free rate of 2.3%.

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On the date of the merger the purchase price was allocated as follows (in thousands):

Identified intangibles

  

$

6,737

 

Goodwill

  

 

6,082

 

In-process research and development

  

 

856

 

Current assets

  

 

4,771

 

Non-current assets

  

 

542

 

Current liabilities

  

 

(11,889

)

Non-current liabilities

  

 

(150

)

Direct acquisition and equity issuance costs

  

 

(1,659

)

   


Equity consideration

  

$

5,290

 

   


In connection with the merger, the Company wrote-off the purchased in-process research and development of $0.9 million, which was charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. The purchased in-process research and development is solely related to the next version of Old Captiva’s FormWare software. The latest release of Old Captiva’s FormWare software was introduced in March 2002. Old Captiva’s forms processing solutions complement the Company’s existing line of document capture solutions to create a more complete input management software solution. Based on time spent on the next version of Old Captiva’s FormWare software system and costs incurred, this project was estimated to be approximately 44% complete as of the merger date. At the date of acquisition, the total cost to complete the project was estimated to be approximately $0.8 million, primarily consisting of salaries, and the project is expected to be completed during the first quarter of 2003. The estimated fair value of the project was estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow model which was based on estimates of operating results and capital expenditures for the period from August 1, 2002 to December 31, 2006 and a risk adjusted discount rate of 30%. Projects that qualify as IPR&D represent those that have not yet reached technological feasibility and for which no future alternative uses existed. Technological feasibility is defined as being equivalent to a beta-phase working prototype in which there is no remaining risk relating to the development. The estimates used in valuing IPR&D were based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable, and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. The other acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of between less than one year and five years. The estimated lives were determined based on an analysis, as of the acquisition date, of conditions in, and the economic outlook for the input management software industry and the history, current state and future operations of Old Captiva. The results of operations of Old Captiva are included in the year ended December 31, 2002 only from August 1, 2002. If the merger would have occurred on January 1, 2001, pro forma financial information would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share information):

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


 

Net revenue

  

$

48,583

 

  

$

46,296

 

Net loss

  

 

(1,406

)

  

 

(942

)

Basic and diluted net loss per share

  

 

(0.16

)

  

 

(0.11

)

The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for an entire year and should not be relied upon as such. The pro forma financial information above includes the results of operations from the Old Captiva business from January 1, 2001. In addition, the pro forma financial information above includes the amortization of purchased intangible assets from the beginning of each of the periods

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

presented and $2.1 million in merger costs in the year ended December 31, 2002 and excludes a write-off of in-process research and development of $0.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2002.

During the year ended December 31, 2002, as the result of a review of the combined operation, the Company adopted a plan which included a reduction of its workforce and office space made redundant by the merger. This plan is expected to largely be completed during 2003. As a result of the adoption of this plan, the Company recorded charges of $2.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2002. These charges primarily relate to the consolidation of the Company’s continuing operations resulting in the impairment of an asset, excess lease costs and a reduction in workforce, resulting in costs incurred for employee severance.

Employee reductions occurred primarily in marketing and administrative areas. As a result of this plan, the Company reduced its work force by approximately 20 employees. Substantially all workforce reductions occurred during 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2002, charges related to the reduction of workforce totaling $0.9 million were recorded and activities costing $0.7 million were completed.

As a part of this plan, the carrying value of a prepaid royalty fee was written off. The technology associated with this royalty fee was utilized in certain of the Company’s products and because of technology acquired in the merger it will no longer be utilized. In the third quarter, the Company recorded a loss from impairment of an asset of $0.5 million, which was recorded as a merger cost.

Also as part of this plan, the Company elected to consolidate its operations and attempt to sublease certain of its facilities which housed portions of its operations, marketing, sales and administrative activities. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recorded estimated excess lease costs of $0.8 million which were recorded as merger costs. Estimated excess lease costs are based on assumptions of differences between lease payments and sublease receipts that could be realized on a potential sublease and assumed carrying terms. The rates and terms of the actual sublease, if any, may differ materially from these estimates which could result in changes in the restructuring charge recognized during the year ended December 31, 2002. In January 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sublease the excess facility space. The sublease commenced in February 2003 and expires in February 2004. Future expected receipts under the sublease are $0.2 million and $40,000 for the years ending December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. These expected receipts are in excess of the estimated receipts used to estimate the merger costs recorded during the year ended December 31, 2002, however, due to the uncertainty of collectibility of these amounts, the estimated merger costs will be reduced as the sublease receipts are collected or reasonably expected to be collected.

Future cash outlays related to this plan of $0.9 million are expected to be completed in 2003.

Details of the merger costs are as follows (in thousands):

   

Cash/

Non-cash


  

Estimated Cost


  

Completed Activity


     

Reserve Balance at December 31, 2002


Impairment of assets

  

Non-cash

  

$

471

  

$

(471

)

    

$

—  

Excess lease costs

  

Cash

  

 

798

  

 

(139

)

    

 

 659

Reduction in workforce

  

Cash

  

 

879

  

 

(660

)

    

 

219

      

  


    

      

$

2,148

  

$

(1,270

)

    

$

878

      

  


    

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

3.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

 

Principles of Consolidation:

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

In preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to translate the financial statements of the foreignits international subsidiaries from the currency in which they keep their accounting records, generally the local currency, into USUnited States dollars, the reporting currency. This process results in exchange gains and losses which, under the relevant accounting guidance are either included within the statement of operations or as a separate part of net equity under the caption equity adjustment from foreign currencies.

 

The functional currencies of the Company’s subsidiaries are the local currencies. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the current exchange rate at the end of the period. Revenues and expenses are translated at the weighted average exchange rates for the period. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in results of operations. Net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions were not significant during any of the periods presented.

 

Use of Estimates:

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of reported assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition:

 

Revenue is generated primarily from two sourcesthree sources: (i) software, licenses, which includesis primarily software license and royalty revenue, and (ii) services, and other, which includes software license maintenance fees, training and professional services revenue and (iii) hardware and other products, which were primarily sales of third party products, primarily digital scanners. Licensescanners in the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. Software license revenue is recognized upon shipment provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, fees are fixed or determinable, collection is determined to be probable and no significant undelivered obligations remain. Royalty revenue is recognized when partners ship or pre-purchase rights to ship products incorporating the Company’s software, provided collection of such revenue is determined to be probable and the Company has no further obligations. Services and support revenue is recognized ratably over the period of the maintenance contract or as the services are provided. Payments for maintenance fees are generally made in advance and are non-refundable. Third party sales revenueRevenue for hardware and other products is recognized when the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence thatof an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery of the products and/or services has occurred; (iii) the selling price is fixed or determinable and;determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.

 

For arrangements with multiple elements (e.g., delivered and undelivered products, maintenance and other services), the Company allocates revenue to each element of the arrangement based on the fair value of the undelivered elements, which is specific to the Company, using the residual value method. The fair values for

ongoing maintenance and support obligations are based upon separate sales of renewals to customers or upon substantive renewal rates quoted in the agreements. The fair values for services, such as training or consulting, are based upon sales prices of these services when sold separately to other customers. When software licenses are sold without services, revenue is recognized when the above criteria are met. Deferred revenue is primarily

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

comprised of undelivered maintenance services.services and in some cases hardware and other products delivered but not yet accepted. When software licenses are sold with professional services and such services are deemed essential to the functionality of the overall solution,software, combined software license and service revenue is recognized overas the service period.services are performed. When software licenses are sold with professional services and such services are not considered essential to the functionality of the software, software license revenue is recognized when the above criteria are met and service revenue is recognized as the services are performed.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity from date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market funds at cost, which approximates fair value.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk:

 

The Company sells its products primarily to customers located in North America and Europe. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains an allowance for potential credit losses, which have been within management’s expectations.

 

Fair value of financial instruments:

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, line of credit and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

 

Certain Risks and Concentrations:

 

The Company’s products are concentrated in the data capture and documentinput management industry, which is highly competitive and rapidly changing. Significant technological changes in the industry, including changes in computing platforms, changes in customer requirements, the infringement of a proprietary patent, or the emergence of a major direct competitor could affect operating results adversely. In addition, a portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from international sales. Fluctuations of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies or local economic conditions could adversely affect operating results and cash flows.

 

Property and Equipment:

 

Office equipment, machinery and software are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization and depreciated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of three to five years. Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of their useful lives or the related lease term. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, depreciation expense, including amortization of property and equipment acquired under capital lease obligations, was $0.6 million, $0.8$0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

 

Software Development Costs:

 

Costs, primarily salaries, incurred in the research and development of new products and enhancements primarily salaries, to existing products are charged to expense as incurred until the technological feasibility of the product or enhancement has been established. After establishing technological feasibility, material development costs incurred through the date the product is available for general release to customers would be capitalized and amortized over the estimated product life. To date, the period between achievements of technological feasibility,

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

which the Company defines as the establishment of a working model, until the general availability of such software to customers, has been short

and software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any software development costs since its inception.

 

Intangible Assets:

 

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized.amortized but is tested annually for impairment. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from less than one year to five years.

 

The determination of the fair value of certain acquired assets and liabilities is subjective in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Determining the fair values and useful lives of intangible assets especially requires the exercise of judgment. To assist the Company in this process, the Company used an independent valuation firm. While there are a number of different generally accepted valuation methods to estimate the value of intangible assets acquired, the Company primarily used the discounted cash flow method. This method requires significant management judgment to forecast the future operating results used in the analysis. In addition, other significant estimates are required, such as residual growth rates and discount factors. The estimates that the Company has used are consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company uses to manage its business, based on available historical information and industry averages. The judgments made in determining the estimated useful lives assigned to each class of assets acquired can also significantly affect the Company’s net operating results. Amortization of purchased intangibles is expected to be $2.1 million, $2.1 million, $1.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the years ending December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

 

In addition, the value of the Company’s intangible assets, including goodwill, is subject to future impairments if the Company experiences declines in operating results or negative industry or economic trends or if the Company’s future performance is below the Company’s projections and estimates.

 

Valuation of Goodwill:

 

The Company assesses the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment is reviewed at least annually.

 

Factors the Company considers important whichImportant factors that could trigger an impairment, include the following:

 

Significant under performanceunderperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results;

 

Significant changes in the manner of the Company’s use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business;

 

Significant negative industry or economic trends;

 

Significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period; and

 

Decreased market capitalization relative to net book value.

 

When there is indication that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. The Company performed its annual impairment review in the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and determined there was no impairment.

 

Stock-Based Compensation:

 

The Company has elected to utilize the intrinsic value method to account for theirits employee stock option plans. When the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options equals the fair value price of the

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized in the Company’s financial statements. Compensation expense for options granted to non-employees is determined in accordance with SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 and EITFEmerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 96-18 as the fair value of the consideration

received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured. Deferred charges for options granted to non-employees are periodically remeasured as the underlying options vest.

Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based compensation to employees been determined based on the fair value method, the amount of stock basedstock-based employee compensation cost and the Company’s pro forma results would have been as indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):

 

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 

Net loss as reported

  

$

(532

)

  

$

(1,915

)

  

$

(8,758

)

Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax, utilizing the intrinsic value method

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

422

 

Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax, utilizing the fair value method

  

 

(1,318

)

  

 

(822

)

  

 

(2,502

)

Pro forma net loss under SFAS No. 123

  

 

(1,850

)

  

 

(2,737

)

  

 

(10,838

)

Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share under SFAS No. 123

  

 

(0.30

)

  

 

(0.64

)

  

 

(2.59

)

   

Year Ended

December 31,


 
   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Net income (loss) as reported

  $2,587  $(532) $(1,915)

Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax, utilizing the intrinsic value method

   —     —     —   

Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax, utilizing the fair value method

   (1,058)  (1,318)  (822)
   


 


 


Pro forma net income (loss) under SFAS No. 123

  $1,529  $(1,850) $(2,737)
   


 


 


Pro forma basic net income (loss) per share under SFAS No. 123

  $0.16  $(0.30) $(0.64)

Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share under SFAS No. 123

  $0.14  $(0.30) $(0.64)

 

The fair value of each option grant issued for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001 was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

  

Year Ended December 31,


   

Year Ended

December 31,


  

2002


   

2001


   

2000


   2003

  2002

  2001

Risk-free interest rate

  

2.5

%

  

4.1

%

  

5.6

%

  2.2%  2.5%  4.1%

Expected life

  

3.5 years

 

  

3.5 years

 

  

3.5 years

 

  3.5 years  3.5 years  3.5 years

Expected volatility

  

90

%

  

50

%

  

50

%

  100%  90%  50%

Expected dividend yield

  

—  

 

  

—  

 

  

—  

 

  0%  0%  0%

 

The weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $6.32, $1.12 and 2000 was $1.12, $1.73 and $4.60 per share, respectively. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of options is amortized to expense over the vesting period.

 

The fair value of each purchase right issued under the Company’s employee stock purchase plans for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001 was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

  

Year Ended December 31,


   

Year Ended

December 31,


  

2002


   

2001


   

2000


   2003

  2002

  2001

Risk-free interest rate

  

2.5

%

  

4.1

%

  

5.6

%

  2.2%  2.5%  4.1%

Expected life

  

0.5 years

 

  

0.5 years

 

  

0.5 years

 

  0.5 years  0.5 years  0.5 years

Expected volatility

  

90

%

  

50

%

  

50

%

  100%  90%  50%

Expected dividend yield

  

—  

 

  

—  

 

  

—  

 

  0%  0%  0%

The weighted-average purchase price of stock purchases under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan in 2003 was $1.63.

 

Advertising:

 

The Company expenses the costs of advertising as the expenses are incurred. The costs of advertising consist primarily of magazine advertisements, brochures, and other direct production costs. Costs associated with trade

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

trade shows are charged to expense upon completion of the trade show. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 and 2000 was $0.4 million, $0.8 million $1.1 million and $2.0$1.1 million, respectively.

 

Income Taxes:

 

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

 

The Company has not provided for United States federal income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings of its international subsidiaries because such earnings are intended to be reinvested indefinitely outside of the United States.

Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share:

 

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common stockshares outstanding for that period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of incremental common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants.

 

Dilutive securities include options subject to vesting and warrants as if converted.on an as-if-converted-to-common stock basis. Dilutive securities of 1.75 million shares are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation for the year ended December 31, 2003. Potentially dilutive securities totaling 0.7 million, 4.9 million and 1.8 million and 3.0 millionshares for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively, were excluded from basic and diluted earnings per share because of their anti-dilutive effect.

 

Comprehensive Income:Income (Loss):

 

Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity during the period from non-owner sources. To date, the Company has not had any material transactions that are required to be reported in comprehensive income (loss), except for an equity adjustment from foreign currencies.currencies and net income (loss).

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

 

In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” was issued Statementin January 2003, and a revision of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“FAS 146”)FIN 46 was issued in December 2003 (FIN 46R). This statement supercedes Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3,Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other CostsFIN 46R requires certain variable interest entities to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurredbe consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in a Restructuring) (EITF 94-3). FAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. FAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company recently initiated certain exit activities and is accounting for those activities under EITF 94-3. Accordingly, adoption of FAS 146 willentity do not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 (“FAS 148”). This statement amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation (“FAS 123”) to provide alternative methods of voluntarily transitioning to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. FAS 148 also amends the disclosure requirements of FAS 123 to require disclosure of the method used to account for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method on reported results in both annual and interim financial statements. The quarterly disclosure provisions will be effective for the Company beginning

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

with the quarter ending March 31, 2003. The Company will continue to utilize the intrinsic value method and accordingly, adoption of FAS 148 has no material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (the “Interpretation”). The Interpretation requires companies to recognize, at inception of the guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee and also requires a guarantor to make significant new disclosures, even when the likelihood of making any payments under the guarantee is remote. The Interpretation provides specific guidance identifying the characteristics of contracts that are subjecta controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its guidance in its entiretyactivities without additional subordinated financial support from those only subject to the initial recognition and measurement provisions.other parties. The recognition and measurement provisions of the InterpretationFIN 46R are effective on a prospective basisimmediately for guarantees issued or modifiedall arrangements entered into after DecemberJanuary 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of the Interpretation are effective for interim and annual period financial statements ending after December 15, 2002. Although2003. Since January 31, 2003, the Company has issued guarantees and will likely continue to issue guarantees thatnot invested in any entities it believes are withinvariable interest entities. Had we entered into any of those arrangements prior to February 1, 2003, the scopeCompany would be required to adopt the provisions of FIN 46R at the end of the Interpretation,first quarter of fiscal 2004, in accordance with the fair value associated with such guarantees is not expected to be material. Accordingly,FASB Staff Position 46-6 which delayed the effective date of FIN 46R for those arrangements. The Company expects the adoption of the Interpretation is not currently expected toFIN 46R will have a material impactno effect on the Company’s results of operations.its financial statements.

 

ReclassificationsReclassifications:

 

Certain prior year items have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on total assets, net revenues, operating losses or net loss as previously reported.

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION2.    Merger of ActionPoint and Captiva Software

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)On July 31, 2002, the Company completed the merger with privately-held Captiva Software Corporation, or Old Captiva, of San Diego, California. Old Captiva was a provider of forms input management software and related services. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company exchanged all of Old Captiva’s outstanding common stock for 4.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock and 2.2 million replacement options to purchase common stock, of which 772,000 options were vested, and issued warrants to purchase approximately 8,000 shares of common stock. The 2.2 million options to purchase common stock have exercise prices ranging from $0.52 to $2.43 per share and a weighted-average exercise price of $1.94 per share. The warrants to purchase common stock had an exercise price of $2.43 per share.

 

The merger was accounted for as a purchase. The fair value of the Company’s common stock issued in the merger of $1.11 per share was determined based on the average closing price three days prior to the completion date of the merger. The fair value of the vested replacement options and the warrants to purchase common stock were estimated based on a Black-Scholes model utilizing the following assumptions: fair value of common stock of $1.11 per share, expected term of two years, expected volatility of 90%, expected dividend yield of 0% and a risk-free interest rate of 2.3%.

On the date of the merger the purchase price was allocated as follows (in thousands):

Identified intangibles

  $6,737 

Goodwill

   6,082 

In-process research and development

   856 

Current assets

   4,771 

Non-current assets

   542 

Current liabilities

   (11,889)

Non-current liabilities

   (150)

Direct acquisition and equity issuance costs

   (1,659)
   


Equity consideration

  $5,290 
   


In connection with the merger, the Company wrote-off the purchased in-process research and development of $0.9 million, which was charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. The purchased in-process research and development (IPR&D) is solely related to the next version of Old Captiva’s Formware software. The latest release of Old Captiva’s Formware software prior to the Merger was introduced in March 2002. Based on time spent on the next version of Old Captiva’s Formware software system and costs incurred, this project was estimated to be approximately 44% complete as of the merger date. At the date of acquisition, the total cost to complete the project was estimated to be approximately $0.8 million, primarily consisting of salaries, and the project was completed during the second quarter of 2003, as expected. The results of operations of Old Captiva are included in the year ended December 31, 2002 only from August 1, 2002. If the merger had occurred on January 1, 2001, pro forma financial information would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share information):

   

Year Ended

December 31,


 
   (unaudited) 
   2002

  2001

 

Net revenue

  $48,583  $46,296 

Net loss

   (1,406)  (942)

Basic and diluted net loss per share

   (0.16)  (0.11)

The pro forma financial information above includes the results of operations from the Old Captiva business from January 1, 2001. In addition, the pro forma financial information above includes the amortization of purchased intangible assets from the beginning of each of the periods presented and $2.1 million in merger costs in the year

ended December 31, 2002 and excludes a write-off of in-process research and development of $0.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2002.

During the year ended December 31, 2002, as the result of a review of the combined operation, the Company adopted a plan which included a reduction of its workforce and office space made redundant by the merger. This plan was largely completed during 2003. As a result of the adoption of this plan, the Company recorded charges of $2.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2002. These charges primarily relate to the consolidation of the Company’s continuing operations resulting in the impairment of an asset, excess lease costs and employee severance costs related to a reduction in workforce.

Details of the Merger costs are as follows (in thousands):

   

Cash/

Non-

cash


  

Estimated

Cost


  

Completed

Activity

2002


  

Completed

Activity

2003


  

Adjustments

2003


  

Accrual Balance

at December 31,

2003


Impairment of assets

  Non-
cash
  $471  $(471) $—    $—    $—  

Excess lease costs

  Cash   798   (139)  (487)  (58)  114

Reduction in workforce

  Cash   879   (660)  (219)  —     —  
      

  


 


 


 

      $2,148  $(1,270) $(706) $(58) $114
      

  


 


 


 

 

4.3.    Composition of Certain Balance Sheet Captions:Captions

 

  

December 31,


   December 31,

 
  

2002


   

2001


   2003

 2002

 
  

(in thousands)

   (in thousands) 

Accounts receivable, net:

         

Accounts receivable

  

$

12,519

 

  

$

5,094

 

  $11,556  $12,519 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  

 

(755

)

  

 

(249

)

   (776)  (755)
  


  


  


 


  

$

11,764

 

  

$

4,845

 

  $10,780  $11,764 
  


  


  


 


Prepaid expenses and other current assets:

         

Inventory

  

$

1,077

 

  

$

—  

 

Purchased equipment inventory

  $1,258  $1,077 

Deferred taxes

  

 

839

 

  

 

—  

 

   794   839 

Other

  

 

648

 

  

 

935

 

   1,262   648 
  


  


  


 


  

$

2,564

 

  

$

935

 

  $3,314  $2,564 
  


  


  


 


Property and equipment, net:

         

Office equipment and machinery

  

$

2,255

 

  

$

2,078

 

  $2,738  $2,255 

Computer software

  

 

908

 

  

 

749

 

   914   908 

Leasehold improvements

  

 

533

 

  

 

526

 

   561   533 
  


  


  


 


  

 

3,696

 

  

 

3,353

 

   4,213   3,696 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

  

 

(2,682

)

  

 

(2,545

)

   (3,289)  (2,682)
  


  


  


 


  

$

1,014

 

  

$

808

 

  $924  $1,014 
  


  


  


 


Intangible assets, net:

      

Existing technology

  

$

4,813

 

  

$

—  

 

Tradename and trademarks

  

 

679

 

  

 

—  

 

Core technology

  

 

551

 

  

 

—  

 

Maintenance agreements

  

 

479

 

  

 

—  

 

Channel partner relationships

  

 

116

 

  

 

—  

 

Order backlog

  

 

99

 

  

 

—  

 

Patents

  

 

92

 

  

 

—  

 

Accumulated amortization

  

 

(972

)

  

 

—  

 

Other assets:

   

Deferred taxes

  $2,104  $—   

Other

   250   402 
  


  


  


 


  

$

5,857

 

  

$

—  

 

  $2,354  $402 
  


  


  


 


Accrued compensation and related liabilities:

   

Accrued vacation

  $1,118  $1,106 

Other

   1,675   1,808 
  


 


  $2,793  $2,914 
  


 


CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

   

Gross

Carrying

Amount


  

Accumulated

Amortization


  

Net

Carrying

Amount


Intangible assets, net:

            

December 31, 2003:

            

Existing technology

  $4,813  $(2,273) $2,540

Tradename and trademarks

   679   (193)  486

Core technology

   551   (195)  356

Maintenance agreements

   479   (226)  253

Channel partner relationships

   116   (55)  61

Order backlog

   99   (99)  —  

Patents

   92   (26)  66
   

  


 

Maintenance agreements

  $6,829  $(3,067) $3,762
   

  


 

December 31, 2002:

            

Existing technology

  $4,813  $(668) $4,145

Tradename and trademarks

   679   (57)  622

Core technology

   551   (57)  494

Maintenance agreements

   479   (67)  412

Channel partner relationships

   116   (16)  100

Order backlog

   99   (99)  —  

Patents

   92   (8)  84
   

  


 

Maintenance agreements

  $6,829  $(972) $5,857
   

  


 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

5.4.    Commitments:

 

The Company has entered into various operating leases for its facilities and sales offices, which expire at various dates through 2007.2009. The Company has entered into capital leases for certain of its property and equipment which expire in 2004. Future minimum lease commitments at December 31, 20022003 due under these non-cancelable operating and capital leases are as follows (in thousands)(in thousands):

 

  

Operating

Leases


  

Capital

Leases


 

Year ending December 31

      

2003

  

 

2,441

  

 

62

 

  

Operating

Leases


  

Capital

Leases


 

Year ending December 31,

      

2004

  

 

1,327

  

 

62

 

  $1,857  $62 

2005

  

 

201

  

 

—  

 

   1,556   —   

2006

  

 

127

  

 

—  

 

   1,484   —   

2007

  

 

30

  

 

—  

 

   1,321   —   

2008

   1,323   —   

Thereafter

   716   —   
  

  


  

  


Total minimum lease payments

  

$

4,126

  

 

124

 

  $8,257   62 
  

     

   

Less amount representing interest

     

 

(4

)

      (2)
     


     


Total present value of minimum payments

     

 

120

 

      60 

Less current portion

     

 

(60

)

      (60)
     


     


Non-current portion

     

$

60

 

     $—   
     


     


 

Rent expense was approximately $1.8$1.7 million, $1.3$1.8 million and $1.3 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, and 2000, respectively. In January 2003, the Company extended the term of a facility lease to January 2009 at a reduced rental rate. As of the date of the amendment, the Company’s future minimum lease commitments due under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

   

Operating

Leases


Year ending December 31

    

2003

  

 

2,202

2004

  

 

1,074

2005

  

 

726

2006

  

 

737

2007

  

 

655

Thereafter

  

 

695

   

Total minimum lease payments

  

$

6,089

   

 

6.5.    Line of Credit:

 

In connection with the merger, the Company assumed a line of credit with a bank. In August 2003, the Company extended the term of its line of credit. The line of credit will expire in August 2003.2004. On December 31, 2002, the2003, there

was no outstanding principal balance was $2.1 million.under the line of credit. Borrowings under the line of credit are limited to the lesser of $3.0 million or 80% of eligible accounts receivable. Outstanding balances under the line of credit and the term loan bear interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 0.5% (4.75%(4.5% at December 31, 2002)2003). All assets of the Company collateralize the credit facility. The Company is restricted from paying dividends under the terms of the line of credit. The line of credit includes various financial covenants related to the Company’s operating results.

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION As of December 31, 2003, the Company was compliant with all loan covenants.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

7.6.    Stockholders’ Equity:

 

Preferred Stock:Stock: The Board of Directors is authorized to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions (including voting rights) of preferred stock without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The Board is also authorized to increase or decrease the number of shares of any series. At December 31, 2001,2003 and 2002, there were 2,000,000 shares of $.01 par value preferred stock authorized. No preferred shares were issued and outstanding at December 31, 2002, 2001,2003 or 2000.2002.

Warrants: Under the terms of the merger agreement of the merger of Old Captiva and ActionPoint, the Company issued warrants to purchase approximately 8,000 shares of common stock. The warrants to purchase common stock had an exercise price of $2.43 per share. In November 2003, these warrants were converted in a net exercise, in accordance with the warrant agreements, into approximately 6,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plans:Plans:The Board of Directors has reserved 200,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 130,000 shares under the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 500,000 shares under the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “1998 ESPP”)1998 ESPP). During the year ended December 31, 2002, the 1998 ESPP was amended to to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance during each six-month purchase period from 50,000 to 150,000 and to add a provision under which the total number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1998 ESPP was automatically restored to 150,000 on July 1, 2002, and will be restored to 300,000 on January 1 of each subsequent year. Employees who enrolled in the 1998 ESPP prior to October 2003 may elect to have the Company withhold up to 10% of their compensation for the purchase of the Company’s common stock. In October 2003, the 1998 ESPP was amended to allow employees who enroll in the 1998 ESPP subsequent to October 2003 to elect to have the Company withhold up to 15% of their compensation for the purchase of the Company’s common stock. The amounts withheld are used to purchase the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 85% of the fair market value of the stock on the day before the first day of a two-year offering or the last day of a six-month purchase period, whichever is lower. The number of shares employees may purchase is subject to certain limitations.

 

Stock Option Plans:Plans: The Company has established the 1993 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (the 1993 Plan) and, the 1999 Stock Plan (the 1999 Plan) and the 2003 New Executive Recruitment Stock Option Plan (the 2003 Plan). As amended, the 1993 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 3,274,852 shares of common stock over the term of the Plan, pursuant to the grant of incentive stock and non-qualified stock options and the direct issuance of shares to eligible employees, independent consultants and non-employee directors. The 1999 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 700,000 shares of common stock over the term of the Plan, pursuant to the grant of non-qualified stock options and the direct issuance of shares to eligible employees and independent consultantsconsultants. The 2003 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of common stock over the term of the Plan, pursuant to the grant of non-qualified stock options and non-employee directors.the direct issuance of shares to eligible employees. In connection with the merger with Old Captiva in July 2002, the Company issued replacement stock options under the 1994 Captiva Software Corporation Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and the Captiva 2002 Equity Incentive Plan and all outstanding options to purchase common stock of Old Captiva under such plans. By virtue of the merger, the Old Captiva options were proportionally adjusted with respect to exercise prices and the number of shares subject to each option based on the exchange ratio used in the merger. All other terms of the Old Captiva options, such as vesting schedules, remained unchanged. As of July 31, 2002, the replacement options were exercisable for a total of 772,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with exercise prices ranging from $0.52 to $2.43 per share. The Company will not make future grants under either of the Old Captiva plans.

In 1999, the Company issued an option to purchase 47,750 shares of common stock to a consulting firm with which it has an ongoing business relationship, under the 1999 Plan. The fully vested option, with a strike price of $4.88 per share, was valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant. The fair value of approximately $60,000 was recorded as consulting expense in the year ended December 31, 2000 as earned. The option expired unexercised during the year ended December 31, 2002.

Under these stock option plans, the exercise price per share is determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The exercise price of an incentive stock option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date and the exercise price of a non-qualified stock option cannot be less than 85% of such fair market value. Options generally vest over four years and have a term of ten years.

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

All stock option transactions are summarized as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 

      

Options Outstanding


  

Number of Shares Available for Grant


   

Number of Shares


   

Weighted Average Exercise Price


  

Number of

Shares

Available for

Grant


  Options Outstanding

Balance at December 31, 1999

  

134

 

  

2,660

 

  

$

6.56

Plan Amendment

  

550

 

      

Granted

  

(613

)

  

613

 

  

$

8.47

Canceled

  

158

 

  

(158

)

  

$

8.34

Exercised

  

—  

 

  

(85

)

  

$

7.02

  

  

   

Number of

Shares

Available for

Grant


  

Number of

Shares


 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price


Balance at December 31, 2000

  

229

 

  

3,030

 

  

$

6.84

   3,030  $6.84

Plan Amendment

  

150

 

        150  

Granted

  

(751

)

  

751

 

  

$

3.35

  (751) 751  $3.35

Canceled

  

1,958

 

  

(1,958

)

  

$

7.16

  1,958  (1,958) $7.16

Exercised

  

—  

 

  

(1

)

  

$

6.00

  —    (1) $6.00
  

  

     

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2001

  

1,586

 

  

1,822

 

  

$

5.06

  1,586  1,822  $5.06

Granted

  

(1,318

)

  

1,318

 

  

$

2.27

  (1,318) 1,318  $2.27

Issued in merger with Old Captiva

  

—  

 

  

2,227

 

  

$

1.94

  —    2,227  $1.94

Cancellation of options issued in merger with Old Captiva

  

—  

 

  

(4

)

  

$

2.18

  —    (4) $2.18

Canceled

  

421

 

  

(421

)

  

$

5.21

  421  (421) $5.21

Expired

  

—  

 

  

(48

)

  

$

4.88

  —    (48) $4.88

Exercised

  

—  

 

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  —    —     —  
  

  

     

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2002

  

689

 

  

4,894

 

  

$

2.88

  689  4,894  $2.88

New Plan

  500  

Granted

  (660) 660  $7.95

Cancellation of options issued in merger with Old Captiva

  —    (16) $2.40

Canceled

  338  (338) $4.88

Exercised

  —    (1,733) $2.74
  

  

     

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2003

  867  3,467  $3.74
  

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001 there were options outstanding to purchase 2.0 million shares, 2.8 million shares 1.0 million shares and 1.81.0 million shares, respectively, vested and exercisable at weighted average exercise prices per share of $2.95, $3.14 $6.20 and $6.99,$6.20, respectively.

 

The following table summarizes all options outstanding and exercisable by price range as of December 31, 2001:2003:

 

Options Outstanding


    

Options Exercisable


Range of Exercise Prices


    

Number of Shares (thousands)


    

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life—Years


    

Weighted Average Exercise Price


    

Number of Shares (thousands)


    

Weighted Average Exercise Price


$0.52–  0.52

    

550

    

9.6

    

$

0.52

    

550

    

$

0.52

0.86–  1.45

    

313

    

9.2

    

 

1.31

    

76

    

 

1.40

1.56–  2.43

    

2,749

    

8.2

    

 

2.41

    

1,216

    

 

2.40

2.63–  5.00

    

620

    

6.9

    

 

3.88

    

409

    

 

4.25

5.16–  7.88

    

588

    

6.2

    

 

6.17

    

512

    

 

6.27

8.00–31.00

    

74

    

4.0

    

 

10.30

    

62

    

 

9.79

     
               
      

$0.52–31.00

    

4,894

    

8.0

    

$

2.88

    

2,825

    

$

3.14

     
               
      
Options Outstanding

 Options Exercisable

Range of

Exercise Prices


 

Number

of Shares

(thousands)


 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life-Years


 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price


 

Number

of Shares

(thousands)


 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price


$    0.52 -   0.52 367 8.6 $0.52 367 $0.52
0.86 -   1.45 226 8.4  1.29 78  1.28
1.56 -   2.43 1,678 8.1  2.41 1,021  2.41
2.63 -   5.00 471 8.0  4.03 165  4.35
5.16 -   7.88 371 5.4  6.20 332  6.28
8.00 - 13.11 341 9.7  11.71 8  8.47
15.75 - 31.00 13 2.4  18.80 12  18.65
  
      
   
$    0.52 - 31.00 3,467 8.0 $3.74 1,983 $2.95
  
      
   

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On August 3, 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock option exchange program (the Exchange Program). Under the Exchange Program, employees were given the opportunity to exchange one or more new stock options previously granted to them in exchange for a promise to receive one or more new stock options to be granted at least six months and a day after the old options were cancelled provided the individual was still employed or providing service on such date. The participation deadline for this Exchange Program was August 31, 2001. In total, 1,137,629 stock options were returned to the Company and cancelled as a result of this Exchange Program. On March 2, 2002, 1,137,629 stock options were issued under the Exchange Program at a exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock of $2.43 per share. The options granted in March have the same vesting start date as the cancelled options and were immediately exercisable as to the vested shares when granted.

 

8.7.    Business Segments:

 

The Company has a single reportable segment consisting of the development, marketing and servicing of input management software. Management uses one measurement of profitability and does not disaggregate its business for internal reporting. Operations outside the United States primarily consist of sales offices of the Company’s subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia, which are responsible for sales to foreigninternational customers. The foreigninternational subsidiaries do not carry any significant tangible long-lived assets.

 

The following table presents revenue derived from domestic and international sales, based on location of customer, for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 2001 and 2000,2001, respectively (in thousands, except percentage data):

 

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 

United States

  

$

26,652

 

  

$

15,425

 

  

$

18,531

 

% of total

  

 

75

%

  

 

70

%

  

 

74

%

International

  

 

$8,952

 

  

 

$6,611

 

  

 

$6,511

 

% of total

  

 

25

%

  

 

30

%

  

 

26

%

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

   

Year Ended

December 31,


 
   2003

  2002

  2001

 

United States and Canada

  $45,163  $26,652  $15,424 

% of total

   79%  75%  70%

International (excluding Canada)

  $11,982  $8,952  $6,611 

% of total

   21%  25%  30%

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

9.8.    Income Taxes:

 

Significant components of the provision for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):

 

  

Year Ended December 31,


    

Year Ended

December 31,


  

2002


   

2001


  

2000


    2003

   2002

   2001

Current:

                    

Federal

  

$

706

 

  

$

79

  

$

    $1,107   $706   $79

State

  

 

87

 

  

 

33

  

 

     105    87    33

Foreign

  

 

34

 

  

 

169

  

 

     301    34    169
  


  

  

    


  


  

  

 

827

 

  

 

281

  

 

     1,513    827    281
  


  

  

    


  


  

Deferred:

                    

Federal

  

 

(702

)

  

 

3,386

  

 

     (349)   (702)   3,386

State

  

 

(103

)

  

 

548

  

 

     (2)   (103)   548

Foreign

  

 

266

 

  

 

—  

  

 

     —      266    —  
  


  

  

    


  


  

  

 

(539

)

  

 

3,934

  

 

     (351)   (539)   3,934
  


  

  

    


  


  

Total:

                    

Federal

  

 

4

 

  

 

3,465

  

 

     758    4    3,465

State

  

 

(16

)

  

 

581

  

 

     103    (16)   581

Foreign

  

 

300

 

  

 

169

  

 

     301    300    169
  


  

  

    


  


  

  

$

288

 

  

$

4,215

  

$

  —

    $1,162   $288   $4,215
  


  

  

    


  


  

The following is a reconciliation from the expected statutory federal income tax expense to the Company’s actual income tax expense (in thousands):

 

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 

Statutory federal income tax rate

  

34.0

 %

  

34.0

%

  

(33.5

)%

State taxes, net of federal benefit

  

4.5

 %

  

6.0

%

  

(5.1

)%

Effect of foreign operations

  

(25.1

)%

  

—  

 

  

—  

 

Research and development credits

  

22.0

 %

  

—  

 

  

—  

 

Non-deductible expenses

  

(133.5

)%

  

—  

 

  

—  

 

Change in valuation allowance

  

(19.9

)%

  

143.2

%

  

38.6

 %

   

  

  

   

(118.0

)%

  

183.2

%

  

—  

 

   

  

  

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

   

Year Ended

December 31,


 
   2003

  2002

  2001

 

Statutory federal income tax rate

  34.0% 34.0% 34.0%

State taxes, net of federal benefit

  6.4% 4.5% 6.0%

Effect of foreign operations

  9.1% (25.1)% —   

Research and development credits

  (8.4)% 22.0% —   

Non-deductible expenses

  1.0% (133.5)% —   

Change in valuation allowance

  (11.1)% (19.9)% 143.2%
   

 

 

   31.0% (118.0)% 183.2%
   

 

 

 

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20022003 and 20012002 are shown below (in thousands):

 

  

December 31,


   December 31,

 
  

2002


   

2001


   2003

 2002

 

Current deferred tax assets:

         

Provision for doubtful accounts

  

$

232

 

  

$

100

 

  $226  $232 

Accrued liabilities and deferred revenue

  

 

1,720

 

  

 

814

 

   1,370   1,720 

Net operating loss carryforwards

  

 

1,360

 

  

 

4,378

 

   —     1,360 

Tax credit carryforwards

  

 

—  

 

  

 

1,756

 

Other, net

  

 

—  

 

  

 

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

   (802)  —   
  


  


  


 


Total current deferred tax assets

  

 

3,312

 

  

 

7,048

 

   794   3,312 

Depreciation and basis differences

  

 

54

 

  

 

(87

)

   (147)  54 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

  

 

(2,112

)

  

 

—  

 

   (628)  (2,112)

Deferred revenue

   201   —   

Net operating loss carryforwards

   1,836   —   

Tax credit carryforwards

   842   —   

Valuation allowance

  

 

(415

)

  

 

(6,961

)

   —     (415)
  


  


  


 


Net deferred tax assets

  

$

839

 

  

$

  —  

 

  $2,898  $839 
  


  


  


 


Non-current deferred tax liabilities

  

$

118

 

  

$

—  

 

  $—    $118 
  


  


  


 


 

At December 31, 2002,2003, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards available to reduce its future taxable income of approximately $4.0$4.8 million and $1.0$4.4 million respectively, for federal and state income tax purposes.purposes, respectively. The federal and state operating losses begin to expire in 2005.2019 and 2011, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2001,2003, the Company had deferred tax assetscredit carryforwards of $4.4$0.9 million available to reduce its future taxable income. These tax credit carryforwards begin to expire in 2008.

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Code Sections 382 and $1.8 million for383, use of a portion of the Company’s net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards respectively. are limited because of a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% which occurred in conjunction with the merger.

A full valuation allowance of $0.4 million which was recordedprovided against thesethe Company’s net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2001. As a result of the merger,2002 was released in 2003 based on the Company’s abilitydetermination that it will more likely than not have sufficient taxable income after the benefit of stock option exercises to utilize its net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards has become limited due to ownership changes pursuant to Internal Revenue Code sections 382 and 383. To the extent that the Company’s net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards have become limited and the likelihood of realization is remote, such assets have been removed from gross deferred tax assets with a corresponding decrease to the valuation allowance.assets.

For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company had current income tax expense of $0.8 million for federal, state, and foreign taxes. The Company also had net deferred tax assets in certain taxing jurisdictions at December 31, 2002 which represent future tax deductions. To the extent these future tax deductions are available in jurisdictions in which the Company had 2002 current tax expense and which also provide for the carryback of tax net operating losses, no valuation allowance has been provided. As a result, of the $1.1 million in net deferred tax assets outstanding at December 31, 2002 before valuation allowance, the Company has provided for a $0.4 million valuation allowance.

10.9.    Sale of the Dialog Server Product Line:

 

The Company sold its Dialog Server product line to Chordiant Software, Inc. (Chordiant) on May 17, 2001 for approximately $7.1 million consisting of $2.0 million in cash and 1.7 million shares of Chordiant common stock, which was valued at $3$3.00 per share at the transactionclosing sale date. The Company sold all of the Chordiant common stock, including the shares held escrow, in July 2001 at approximately $2.73 per share, and recognized a loss of approximately $0.4 million. The Company recognized a pretax gain on the transaction comprised of proceeds, excluding amounts in escrow and less transaction expenses, of approximately $4.6 million ($2.3 million net of

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

tax). comprised of proceeds other than amounts in escrow and less transaction expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company received all remaining proceeds and recognized a gain of $0.6 million.

 

11.    Stock Related Bonus Plan:

On October 8, 1999, the Company adopted (and further amended on December 29, 1999 and February 1, 2000) a stock related bonus plan that, upon a specified increase to the Company’s per share stock price, would result in bonus payments of $2.6 million, consisting of a combination of cash and stock to executive officers.

During February 2000 the Company satisfied the requirements for payment of bonuses pursuant to the plan.

12.10.    Employee Benefit Plan:Plan

 

The Company provides a 401(K) Plan (the Plan) to its employees providing tax deferred salary deductions for eligible employees. Participants may make voluntary contributions between 1% and 20% of their compensation subject to certain annual maximums. TheIn the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company matched 50% of employee contributions with a maximum of $2,000 per employee. The Plan provides for additional Company contributions at its discretion.

In conjunction with the merger of Old Captiva on July 31, 2002, the Company assumed the Old Captiva 401(k) plan. The Company matched 1% of employee gross salary for employees that contributed at least 5% of their compensation.

Total matching contributions made by the Company were $0.2 million duringcompensation under this plan from July 31, 2002 2001 and 2000.through December 31, 2002. Effective January 1, 2003, the plans were merged and the Company amended the match to 33% of employee contributions up to a maximum of $1,250 per employee. The Plan provides for additional Company contributions at its discretion. Total matching contributions made by the Company were $0.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

11.    Guarantees

From time to time, the Company provides indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of the Company’s products. To date, the Company has not encountered material costs as a result of such obligations and has not accrued any liabilities related to such indemnifications in its financial statements.

12.    Subsequent Event

On February 1, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of ADP Context, Inc., an Illinois corporation (Context). The Company acquired Context to expand the Company’s presence and application expertise in the payor side of the healthcare market and extend the Company’s reach in to the provider side of this market. The acquisition was effected in accordance with a stock purchase agreement dated as of February 1, 2004 by and among the Company, ADP Integrated Medical Solutions, a Delaware corporation (ADP), and ADP Claims Solutions Group, Inc. (CSG), pursuant to which the Company purchased all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Context from ADP and paid to ADP approximately $5.2 million in immediately available cash. The sole source of the cash consideration the Company paid in the acquisition was the Company’s cash and cash equivalents. There were no material relationships between the Company or any of the Company’s affiliates, directors or officers, on the one hand, and ADP or CSG, on the other hand, at the time of the acquisition. The purchase price allocation for the Context acquisition has not been completed. Adjustments to the purchase price may be made once the final purchase price allocation is completed.

SCHEDULESchedule II

 

CAPTIVA SOFTWARE CORPORATION

 

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(000s omitted)in thousands)

 

  

Balance at Beginning of Year


    

Additions


             Additions

  
      

Charged to Costs and Expenses


   

Deductions


   

Balance at End of Year


  

Balance at

Beginning

of Year


  

Charged to

Costs and

Expenses


 Deductions

 

Balance at

End of
Year


Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:

                    

Year ended December 31, 2000

  

$

209

    

83

 

  

(92

)

  

$

200

Year ended December 31, 2001

  

$

200

    

61

 

  

(12

)

  

$

249

  $200  61  (12) $249

Year ended December 31, 2002

  

$

249

    

658

*

  

(152

)

  

$

755

  $249  658* (152) $755

Year ended December 31, 2003

  $755  332  (311) $776

*Includes $581 related to the merger of ActionPoint, Inc. and Captiva Software Corporation.

 

  

Balance at Beginning of Year


  

Additions


            Additions

    
  

Charged to Costs and Expenses


  

Deductions


   

Balance at End of Year


  

Balance at

Beginning

of Year


  

Charged to

Costs and

Expenses


  Deductions

 

Balance at

End of

Year


Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance:

                     

Year ended December 31, 2000

  

$

  —  

  

3,665

  

  —  

 

  

$

3,665

Year ended December 31, 2001

  

$

3,665

  

3,296

  

—  

 

  

$

6,961

  $3,665  3,296  —    $6,961

Year ended December 31, 2002

  

$

6,961

  

—  

  

(6,546

)

  

$

415

  $6,961  —    (6,546) $415

Year ended December 31, 2003

  $415  —    (415) $—  

 

S-1II-1