Table of Contents


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended DECEMBERDecember 31, 20162019

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-12252 (Equity Residential)

Commission File Number: 0-24920 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)


EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland (Equity Residential)

13-3675988 (Equity Residential)

Illinois (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

36-3894853 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Two North Riverside Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60606

(312) 474-1300

 (Address

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 Par Value (Equity Residential)New York Stock Exchange
7.57% Notes due August 15, 2026 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)New York Stock Exchange
(

Title of each class)class

(

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered)registered

Common Shares of Beneficial Interest,
$0.01 Par Value (Equity Residential)

EQR

New York Stock Exchange

7.57% Notes due August 15, 2026
(ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

N/A

New York Stock Exchange


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:


None (Equity Residential)

Units of Limited Partnership Interest (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

(Title of each class)


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Equity Residential  Yes x  No ¨

ERP Operating Limited Partnership  Yes x  No o


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Equity Residential  Yes ¨  No x

ERP Operating Limited Partnership  Yes ¨  No x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Equity Residential  Yes x  No ¨

ERP Operating Limited Partnership  Yes x  No ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Equity Residential  Yes x  No ¨

ERP Operating Limited Partnership  Yes x  No ¨


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Equity Residential x
ERP Operating Limited Partnership x






Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Equity Residential:

Equity Residential:

Large accelerated filerx

Accelerated filer¨

Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company¨

Emerging growth company

ERP Operating Limited Partnership:

Large accelerated filer¨

Accelerated filer¨

Non-accelerated filerx (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company¨

Emerging growth company


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Equity Residential  ERP Operating Limited Partnership  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Equity Residential  Yes ¨  No x

ERP Operating Limited Partnership  Yes ¨  No x

The aggregate market value of Common Shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $24.8$27.9 billion based upon the closing price on June 30, 20162019 of $68.88$75.92 using beneficial ownership of shares rules adopted pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to exclude voting shares owned by Trustees and Executive Officers, some of whom may not be held to be affiliates upon judicial determination.

The number of Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 par value, outstanding on February 17, 201714, 2020 was 367,097,667.





























2
371,978,449.




DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates by reference certain information that will be contained in Equity Residential'sResidential’s Proxy Statement relating to its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which Equity Residential intends to file no later than 120 days after the end of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019, and thus these items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.  Equity Residential is the general partner and 96.2%96.4% owner of ERP Operating Limited Partnership.



3

2




EXPLANATORY NOTE


This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162019 of Equity Residential and ERP Operating Limited Partnership.  Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “EQR” mean Equity Residential, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”), and references to “ERPOP” mean ERP Operating Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership.  References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP.  References to the “Operating Partnership” mean collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP.  The following chart illustrates the Company'sCompany’s and the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s corporate structure:



EQR is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 20162019 owned an approximate 96.2%96.4% ownership interest in, ERPOP.  The remaining 3.8%3.6% interest is owned by limited partners.  As the sole general partner of ERPOP, EQR has exclusive control of ERPOP'sERPOP’s day-to-day management.  Management operates the Company and the Operating Partnership as one business.  The management of EQR consists of the same members as the management of ERPOP.


The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”) and EQR contributes all net proceeds from its various equity offerings to ERPOP.  In return for those contributions, EQR receives a number of OP Units (see definition below) in ERPOP equal to the number of Common Shares it has issued in the equity offering.  The Company may acquire properties in transactions that include the issuance of OP Units as consideration for the acquired properties.  Such transactions may, in certain circumstances, enable the sellers to defer in whole or in part, the recognition of taxable income or gain that might otherwise result from the sales.  This is one of the reasons why the Company is structured in the manner shown above.  Based on the terms of ERPOP'sERPOP’s partnership agreement, OP Units can be exchanged with Common Shares on a one-for-one basis because the Company maintains a one-for-one relationship between the OP Units of ERPOP issued to EQR and the outstanding Common Shares.


The Company believes that combining the reports on Form 10-K of EQR and ERPOP into this single report provides the following benefits:

enhances investors’ understanding of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;


eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation since a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Company and the Operating Partnership; and

enhances investors' understanding

creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

3


Table of the Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;


Contents

The Company believes it is important to understand the few differences between EQR and ERPOP in the context of how EQR and ERPOP operate as a consolidated company.  All of the Company'sCompany’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and EQR has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP.  EQR'sEQR’s primary function is acting as the general partner of ERPOP.  EQR also issues equity from time to time, the net proceeds of which it is obligated to contribute to ERPOP, and guarantees certain debt of ERPOP, as disclosed in this report.ERPOP.  EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership.  The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company'sCompany’s ownership interests in its joint ventures.  The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity.  Except for the net proceeds from equity offerings by EQR which(which are contributed to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional partnership interests in ERPOP (“OP Units”) (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis) or additional preference units in ERPOP (on a one-


4



for-oneone-for-one preferred share per preference unit basis)), the Operating Partnership generates all remaining capital required by the Company'sCompany’s business.  These sources include the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s working capital, net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under its revolving credit facility and/or commercial paper program, the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securitiespartnership interests, and proceeds received from disposition of certain properties and joint venture interests.

Shareholders'

Shareholders’ equity, partners'partners’ capital and noncontrolling interests are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the Company and those of the Operating Partnership.  The limited partners of the Operating Partnership are accounted for as partners'partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s financial statements and as noncontrolling interests in the Company'sCompany’s financial statements.  The noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s financial statements include the interests of unaffiliated partners in various consolidated partnerships and development joint venture partners.partnerships.  The noncontrolling interests in the Company'sCompany’s financial statements include the same noncontrolling interests at the Operating Partnership level and limited partner OP Unit holders of the Operating Partnership.  The differences between shareholders'shareholders’ equity and partners'partners’ capital result from differences in the equity issued at the Company and Operating Partnership levels.


To help investors understand the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report provides separate consolidated financial statements for the Company and the Operating Partnership; a single set of consolidated notes to such financial statements that includes separate discussions of each entity'sentity’s debt, noncontrolling interests and shareholders'shareholders’ equity or partners'partners’ capital, as applicable; and a combined Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section that includes discrete information related to each entity.


This report also includes separate Part II, Item 9A. 9A, Controls and Procedures, sections and separate Exhibits 31 and 32 certifications for each of the Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the requisite certifications have been made and that the Company and the Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and 18 U.S.C. §1350.


In order to highlight the differences between the Company and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report for the Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Company and the Operating Partnership.  In the sections that combine disclosure of the Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of the Company.  Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that directly or indirectly enters into contracts and joint ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the Company is one business and the Company operates that business through the Operating Partnership.


As general partner with control of ERPOP, EQR consolidates ERPOP for financial reporting purposes, and EQR essentially has no assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP.  Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.  The separate discussions of the Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.


5

4




EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

PART I.

PAGE

PART I.

Item 1.

Business

6

Item 1.

Item 1A.

9

Item 1B.

17

Item 2.

Item 3.2.

17

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

19

Item 4.

19

PART II.

PART II.

Item 5.


20

Item 6.

21

Item 7.

23

Item 7A.

42

Item 8.

43

Item 9.

43

Item 9A.

43

Item 9B.

PART III.

Item 9B.

Other Information

44

PART III.

Item 10.

45

Item 11.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

45

Item 12.

45

Item 13.

45

Item 14.

45

PART IV.

PART IV.

Item 15.

46

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

46

EX-4.1

EX-4.2

EX-4.3

EX-21

EX-23.1

EX-23.2

EX-31.1

EX-31.2

EX-31.3

EX 31.4

EX-32.1

EX-32.2

EX-32.3

EX-32.4

EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT

EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT

EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT

EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT


6

5




PART I


Item 1. Business

General


Equity Residential (“EQR”), is committed to creating communities where people thrive.  The Company, a member of the S&P 500, is focused on the acquisition, development and management of rental apartment properties located in urban and high-density suburban communities where today’s renters want to live, work and play.  ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) is focused on conducting the multifamily property business of EQR.  EQR is a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993 is an S&P 500 company focused on the acquisition, development and management of rental apartment properties in urban and high-density suburban coastal gateway markets where today's affluent renters want to live, work and play. ERP Operating Limited Partnership ("ERPOP"),ERPOP is an Illinois limited partnership was formed in May 1993 to conduct the multifamily residential property business of Equity Residential. EQR has elected to be taxed as a REIT.1993.  References to the "Company," "we," "us"“Company,” “we,” “us” or "our"“our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP.  References to the "Operating Partnership"“Operating Partnership” mean collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP.


  Unless otherwise indicated, the notes to consolidated financial statements apply to both the Company and the Operating Partnership.

EQR is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 20162019 owned an approximate 96.2%96.4% ownership interest in, ERPOP.  All of the Company'sCompany’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and EQR has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP.  EQR issues public equity from time to time, the net proceeds of which it is obligated to contribute to ERPOP, but does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership.  The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company'sCompany’s ownership interests in its joint ventures.  The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity.


As of December 31, 2016, the Company, directly or indirectly through investments in title holding entities, owned all or a portion of 302 properties located in 10 states and the District of Columbia consisting of 77,458 apartment units. The ownership breakdown includes (table does not include various uncompleted development properties):
  Properties Apartment Units
Wholly Owned Properties 280
 72,445
Master-Leased Properties – Consolidated 3
 853
Partially Owned Properties – Consolidated 17
 3,215
Partially Owned Properties – Unconsolidated 2
 945
  302
 77,458

The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois and the Company also operates regional property management offices in each of its six core coastal markets.  As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had approximately 2,700 employees who provided real estate operations, leasing, legal, financial, accounting, acquisition, disposition, development and other support functions.


Certain capitalized terms used herein are defined in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.  See also Note 17 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s segment disclosures.


Available Information


You may access our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to any of those reports we file with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) free of charge aton our website, www.equityapartments.com.  These reports are made available aton our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with the SEC.  The information contained on our website, including any information referred to in this report as being available on our website, is not a part of or incorporated into this report.


Business Objectives and Operating and Investing Strategies


Overview

The Company is one of the largest U.S. publicly-traded owners of rental apartments with a portfolio of properties primarily located in Boston, New York, Washington, D.C., Seattle, San Francisco, Southern California (including Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego) and Denver.  Continued high wage job and income growth, positive demographics and a consumer preference for a rental lifestyle in our highly desirable markets has created a supportive backdrop for our business.  Our markets continue to draw skilled knowledge workers that drive economic growth in the United States.  This, in turn, attracts employers to our markets seeking to locate and expand their businesses and employ this talented pool of workers, resulting in strong demand for our product.  

We believe we have created a best-in-class operating platform to run our properties.  Our employees are focused on delivering remarkable customer service to our residents so they will stay with us longer, be willing to pay higher rent for a great experience and will tell their friends about how much they love living in an Equity Residential property.  Increasingly, we are using technology to improve this resident experience and to operate our business more efficiently. Our disciplined balance sheet management enhances returns and value creation while maintaining capacity to take advantage of future opportunities.  We are committed to sustainability, diversity and inclusion, the total well-being of our employees and being a responsible corporate citizen in the communities in which we operate.  These “Equity Values” are deeply embedded in our culture.  We believe that our stakeholders value stability, liquidity, predictability and accountability and that is the mission to which we remain unwaveringly committed.

6


Table of Contents

Investment Strategy

The Company invests in apartment communities located in strategically targeted markets (primarily urban and high-density suburban locations) with the goal of maximizing our risk adjustedrisk-adjusted total return (operating income plusreturns by balancing current cash flow generation with long-term capital appreciation) on invested capital.

appreciation.  We seek to maximize the income and capital appreciation of our propertiesmeet this goal by investing in markets that are characterized by conditions favorable to multifamily property operations and appreciation. We are focused onover the six coastal markets of Boston, New York, Washington D.C., Southern California (including Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego), San Francisco and Seattle.long-term.  These markets generally feature one or more of the following characteristics that allow us to increase rents:
drive performance:



7




High home ownership costs;single family housing prices;

Strong economic growth as centers of the knowledge-based economy, leading to high wage job growth and household formation, which in turn leads to high demand for our apartments;

Urban core

Highly walkable urban and high-density suburban areas in what we believe are some of the best locations in the public apartment REIT sector with an attractive quality of life, leading to high resident demand and retention;

Favorable demographics contributing to a larger pool of target residents with a high propensity or greater preference to rent apartments; and

Higher barriers to entry where, because of land scarcity or government regulation, it is typically more difficult or costly to build new apartment properties, creating limits on new supply.supply; and

Strong demand drivers.

We believe our strategy also capitalizes on the increasing preference of renters of all ages to live in the urban core of cities or dense suburban locations near transit, entertainment and cultural amenities.  Millennials,Currently demand for rental housing is driven primarily by household formations from the 83Millennial segment of our population, also known as the Echo Boom Generation, that now comprises the largest segment of the U.S. population.  These young adults, born between 1981 and 2000, currently total approximately 78 million people and are disproportionately renters.  We also expect this demographic to remain renters longer due to societal trends favoring delays in marriage and having children.  We believe we will continue to see demand from this group, as the largest sub-segment of this cohort is now turning 29 years old while the median age of our resident is 33 years old.  Following the Millenials is Generation Z, which comprises the more than 70 million people born between ages 182001 and 34, are a prime apartment rental demographic.2014.  Reports also show a growing trend among aging Baby Boomers, a demographic of more than 76 million people born between the ages of 531946 and 71,1964, toward apartment rentals.  We believe we are extremely well positioned to benefit for many years to come as a result of the significant impact these generations will have on rental housing.

Over the past several years, the Company has done an extensive repositioning of its portfolio into urban and highly walkable, close-in suburban assets.  While we continue to look for opportunities to expand our portfolio in these locations, we also have been exploring other markets that both groups appreciate the locational values described aboveshare these same characteristics, such as well as the flexibility thatDenver.  These markets feature strong high wage job growth, high single family home prices and a very attractive lifestyle for our target demographic, which we believe will lead to long-term outperformance for a rental apartments offer.

Our operating focus is on balancingmarket.  

Operations and Innovation

We balance occupancy and rental rates to maximize our revenue while exercising tight cost control to generate the highest possible return to our shareholders.  Revenue is maximized by attracting qualified prospectsthrough our customized pricing system that uses market data on current and projected demand and availability to create both current and forward pricing daily for each apartment unit we manage.  We believe our great success with renewal rate growth is due to our properties, cost-effectively converting these prospects into new residents and keepingmotivation to retain our residents with a relentless focus on customer service.  Highly satisfied so they will renew their leases upon expiration. Whileresidents stay longer and say great things about us.  We also use a standardized purchasing system to control our operating expenses and a business intelligence platform that allows all our team members to quickly identify and address issues and opportunities.

The technology driving the rental industry continues to evolve at a rapid pace, and we believe that it is our high-quality, well-located assets that bringhave long been a leader in deploying and investing in property technology to serve our customers better and operate more efficiently.  As a first mover in such important areas as revenue management, online leasing, centralized procurement and internet listing services, we are focused on technology that improves our operating margin and customer experience.  Currently, we are focused on areas such as self-guided tours enabled by technology; automated responses to us, it iscustomer inquiries; data analytics to drive expense savings and revenue improvements; and “smart home” technology.  We believe these areas will provide the customer servicefoundation for current and superior value provided by our on-site personnel that keeps them renting with us and recommending usfuture improvements to their friends.


We use technology to engage our customers in the way that they want to be engaged. Manyhow we do business.

7


Table of our residents utilize our web-based resident portal which allows them to sign and renew their leases, review their accounts and make payments, provide feedback and make service requests on-line.


Acquisitions and developments may be financed from various sources of capital, which may include retained cash flow, issuance of additional equity and debt, sales of properties and joint venture agreements. In addition, the Company may acquire properties in transactions that include the issuance of partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) as consideration for the acquired properties. Such transactions may, in certain circumstances, enable the sellers to defer, in whole or in part, the recognition of taxable income or gain that might otherwise result from the sales. As part of its strategy, the Company purchases completed and fully occupied apartment properties, partially completed or partially occupied properties and may acquire land parcels to hold and/or sell basedContents

Focus on market opportunities as well as options to buy more land in the future. Our Employees

The Company may also seek to acquire properties by purchasing defaulted or distressed debt that encumbers desirable properties in the hope of obtaining title to property through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure proceedings.


Over the past several years, the Company has done an extensive repositioning of its portfolio into urban and highly walkable, close-in suburban assets. Since 2005, the Company has sold nearly 198,000 apartment units primarily located in the less dense portions of suburban markets for an aggregate sales price of approximately $23.5 billion, acquired nearly 69,000 apartment units primarily located in urban and high-density suburban markets for approximately $20.0 billion and began approximately $5.7 billion of development projects primarily located in urban and high-density suburban markets. We are currently seeking to acquire and develop assets in the following six core coastal metropolitan areas: Boston, New York, Washington D.C., Southern California, San Francisco and Seattle. The sale of the Starwood Portfolio (as defined below) combineda strong, rich culture with the other 2016 dispositions has resulted in the Company's exit from the South Florida, Denver and New England (excluding Boston) markets and has substantially completed the Company's portfolio transformation which started approximately ten years ago. See further discussion below regarding the Company's 2016 disposition activity.
We endeavor to attract and retain the best employees by providing them with the education, resources and opportunities to succeed. We have a commitment to diversityour “Equity Values” of Diversity & Inclusion, “Total Well-Being” (which brings together physical, financial, career, social and community well-being into a cohesive whole), Sustainability and Social Responsibility.  We actively elevate and support these values when employees’ voices are heard and we embrace each other regardless of our differences; when we give back to our communities; when we care for and preserve our environment; and when we encourage and enable our employees and their families to thrive in all areas of its formswell-being.  Our employee-led Equity Values Council leads our efforts on these values by acting as change agents to drive initiatives and strivecreate awareness.  We engage our stakeholders for feedback on key issues, and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) factors help guide our investment and operating strategy.  Additionally, executive compensation is based in part on meeting these important Equity Values goals, and our Board of Trustees takes an active role in overseeing these matters.

Our goal is to promotecreate and maintain a worksustain an inclusive environment where alldiversity will thrive, employees are treated with dignitywill want to work and respect, offered opportunitiesresidents will want to live.  The Equity Values Council drives new, diversity-focused initiatives for professionalrecruitment, career development and valued for their unique contributions to the Company's success. We provide many classroom and on-line training courses to assist our employees in interacting with prospects and residents as well as extensively train our customer service specialists in maintaining our properties and improvements, equipment and appliances.education.  We actively promote from within, and many senior corporate and property leaders have risen from entry level or junior positions.  We monitorsurvey our employees' engagement by surveying thememployees annually to identify strengths and have consistently receivedopportunities in employee satisfaction.  We continue to maintain high engagement scores.



8

Tablescores in these surveys and find our employees say they are proud to work at the Company, value one another as colleagues, believe in our mission and values and feel their skills meet their job requirements.  The Company was honored with a Glassdoor Employees’ Choice Award, recognizing the Company as one of Contents


We havethe 100 Best Places to Work in 2019 among all United States large companies, was in the Top 50 on the overall list and was the highest rated real estate company in this survey.  Indeed also recognized the Company as a commitment to sustainability and consider the environmental impactstop-rated workplace in many of our business activities. Sustainabilitymarkets.

Our Commitment to ESG

Our purpose is creating communities where people thrive.  This needs to be a sustainable endeavor, in which we provide properties that will stand the test of time and social responsibility are key drivers ofremain attractive to our focus on creatingcustomers and the best apartment communities for residents to live, work and play.community without negatively impacting the environment.  We have a dedicated in-house team that initiates and applies sustainable practices in all aspects of our business, including investment activities, development, property operations and property management activities.  With its high density, multifamilyMultifamily housing is by its nature, an environmentally friendlyone of the most environmentally-friendly uses of real estate, as each property type. provides homes for hundreds of families in a denser shared environment.  We invest in locations that are highly walkable and transit-friendly, enabling a low carbon footprint lifestyle for our residents to live, work and play.

Our recent acquisitionsustainability goals help us focus efforts and development activities have been primarily concentratedtrack progress.  We are especially focusing on energy consumption, water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.  We invest in pedestrian-friendly urban and close-in suburban locations near public transportation. When developing and renovating our properties, we strive to reducewith a focus on reducing waste, energy and water usageuse by investing in energy-saving technology, such as those for irrigation, lighting, HVAC and renewable energy, saving technology while positively impacting the experience of our residents and the value of our assets.  We continue to implement a combination of irrigation, lighting, HVAC and renewable energy improvements at our properties that will reduce energy and water consumption. The Company was named the 2016 Global Residential Listed Sector Leader in Sustainability by GRESB, a globally recognized analysis of the sustainability indicators of more than 750 real estate portfolios worldwide. The Company was also recently awarded the Residential Leader in the Light award for sustainability by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT").

For additional information regarding our sustainabilityESG efforts, see our December 2016 CorporateOctober 2019 Environmental, Social Responsibility and SustainabilityGovernance Report at our website, www.equityapartments.com. For 2017, wewww.equityapartments.com.  This report was reviewed and approved by the Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Trustees, which monitors the Company’s ongoing ESG efforts.  We continue to haveenhance our ESG disclosure efforts, including auditing the results outlined in the above report.  In addition, the Company issued $400.0 million of ten-year 4.15% unsecured notes in 2018 as "green" bonds, and as a result, the Company allocated an express company-wide goal regarding enhanced sustainability efforts. Employees, including our executives, will have their performance against our various social responsibility goals evaluated as partamount equal to the net proceeds to eligible green/sustainable projects.  This was the first "green" bond issuance from an apartment REIT.

Please refer to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of our annual performance review process.


Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for the Company’s Results of Operations and Liquidity.

Competition


All of the Company'sCompany’s properties are located in developed areas that include other multifamily properties.  The number of competitive multifamily properties in a particular area could have a material effect on the Company'sCompany’s ability to lease apartment units at its properties and on the rents charged.  The Company may be competing with other entities that have greater resources than the Company and whose managers have more experience than the Company'sCompany’s managers.  In addition, other forms of rental properties and single family housing provide housing alternatives to potential residents of multifamily properties.  See Item 1A. 1A, Risk Factors,for additional information with respect to competition.


Starwood Transaction

Following the approval by the Company's Board of Trustees, the Company executed an agreement with controlled affiliates of Starwood Capital Group ("Starwood") on October 23, 2015 to sell a portfolio of 72 operating properties consisting of 23,262 apartment units located in five markets across the United States for $5.365 billion (the "Starwood Transaction" or "Starwood Portfolio"). On January 26 and 27, 2016, the Company closed on the sale of the entire portfolio described above. The sale of the Starwood Portfolio, combined with the other 2016 dispositions, has resulted in the Company's exit from the South Florida, Denver and New England (excluding Boston) markets and has substantially completed the Company's portfolio transformation which started approximately ten years ago. These sales have narrowed the Company's focus, which is now entirely directed towards our six coastal markets. We believe the assets sold will have lower long-term returns (as compared to investments in our six coastal markets) and that we sold them for prices that are favorable. Given the strong demand for multifamily assets in our six coastal markets from institutional investors and the challenge in recycling $6.8 billion of capital in this competitive marketplace, the Company believed the best risk-adjusted use of the sale proceeds was to distribute a portion to our shareholders and use the remainder to repay outstanding debt (see further discussion below).

The Company used the majority of the proceeds from the Starwood Transaction and other 2016 dispositions to pay two special dividends to its shareholders and holders of OP Units of $11.00 per share/unit in the aggregate. The Company paid special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016. The Company used the majority of the remaining proceeds to reduce aggregate indebtedness in order to make the transaction leverage neutral. The Company retired approximately $2.0 billion in secured and unsecured debt, the majority of which was scheduled to mature in 2016 and 2017, improving the Company's already strong credit metrics.

Debt and Equity Activity

EQR issues public equity from time to time and guarantees certain debt of ERPOP. EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. In addition, ERPOP issues OP Units and preference interests ("Preference Units") from time to time.

Please refer to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for the Company’s and the Operating Partnership's Capital Structure charts as of December 31, 2016.



9

Table of Contents


Major Debt and Equity Activities for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

During 2016:

The Company repaid $440.8 million of 6.256% mortgage debt held in a Fannie Mae loan pool maturing in 2017 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $29.3 million;
The Company repaid $65.5 million of various tax-exempt mortgage bonds maturing in 2026 through 2037 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $0.2 million
The Company repaid $75.9 million of conventional fixed-rate mortgage loans and incurred prepayment penalties of approximately $2.2 million;
The Company repaid $0.9 million of conventional floating-rate mortgage loans;
The Company repaid $8.5 million of scheduled principal repayments on various mortgage debt;
The Company assumed $43.4 million of mortgage debt on one acquired property;
The Company repaid $228.9 million of 5.125% unsecured notes maturing in 2016 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $1.4 million and repaid the remaining $271.1 million of 5.125% unsecured notes at maturity;
The Company repaid $400.0 million of 5.375% unsecured notes maturing in 2016 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $9.5 million;
The Company repaid $255.9 million of 5.750% unsecured notes maturing in 2017 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $16.5 million;
The Company repaid $46.1 million of 7.125% unsecured notes maturing in 2017 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $4.6 million;
The Company repaid $250.0 million of 4.625% unsecured notes maturing in 2021 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $31.6 million;
The Company repaid $48.0 million of 7.570% unsecured notes maturing in 2026 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $19.3 million;
The Company issued $500.0 million of ten-year 2.85% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $496.7 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of approximately 3.10% after termination of a forward starting swap in conjunction with the issuance (see Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion);
The Company issued 815,044 Common Shares pursuant to its Share Incentive Plans and received net proceeds of approximately $35.8 million; and
The Company issued 63,909 Common Shares pursuant to its Employee Share Purchase Plan and received net proceeds of approximately $3.7 million.

During 2015:

The Company repaid $368.5 million of mortgage debt;
The Company repaid $300.0 million of 6.584% unsecured notes at maturity;
The Company issued $450.0 million of ten-year 3.375% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $447.5 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of 3.81% after termination of various forward starting swaps in conjunction with the issuance (see Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion);
The Company issued $300.0 million of thirty-year 4.50% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $298.9 million before underwriting fees and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of 4.55%;
The Company issued 1,456,363 Common Shares pursuant to its Share Incentive Plans and received net proceeds of approximately $59.5 million;
The Company issued 68,462 Common Shares pursuant to its Employee Share Purchase Plan and received net proceeds of approximately $4.4 million; and
The Company repurchased and retired 254,400 of its Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares with a par value of $12.7 million for total cash consideration of approximately $16.3 million inclusive of premiums and accrued dividends through the redemption date.

During 2014:

The Company assumed $28.9 million of mortgage debt on one property;
The Company repaid $100.7 million of mortgage debt;

10

Table of Contents


The Company repaid $500.0 million of 5.250% unsecured notes at maturity;
The Company repaid its $750.0 million unsecured term loan facility in conjunction with the note issuances discussed below;
The Company issued $450.0 million of five-year 2.375% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $449.6 million before underwriting fees and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of 2.52% and swapped the notes to a floating interest rate in conjunction with the issuance (see Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion);
The Company issued $750.0 million of thirty-year 4.50% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $744.7 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of 4.57% after termination of various forward starting swaps in conjunction with the issuance (see Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion);
The Company issued 2,086,380 Common Shares pursuant to its Share Incentive Plans and received net proceeds of approximately $82.6 million;
The Company issued 68,807 Common Shares pursuant to its Employee Share Purchase Plan and received net proceeds of approximately $3.4 million; and
The Company repurchased and retired 31,240 of its Common Shares at a price of $56.87 per share for total consideration of $1.8 million (all related to the vesting of employee restricted shares). See Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

EQR and ERPOP currently have an active universal shelf registration statement for the issuance of equity and debt securities that automatically became effective upon filing with the SEC on June 28, 2016 and expires on June 28, 2019. Per the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds of all equity offerings to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis) or preference units (on a one-for-one preferred share per preference unit basis).
Credit Facilities

EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. EQR guarantees the Operating Partnership’s revolving credit facility up to the maximum amount and for the full term of the facility.

On November 3, 2016, the Company replaced its existing $2.5 billion facility with a $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing January 10, 2022. The Company has the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $750.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase their commitments. The interest rate on advances under the facility will generally be LIBOR plus a spread (currently 0.825%), or based on bids received from the lending group, and the Company pays an annual facility fee (currently 12.5 basis points). Both the spread and the facility fee are dependent on the credit rating of the Company's long-term debt.

The Company's previous $2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility was set to mature on April 2, 2018. The Company had the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $500.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase their commitments. The interest rate on advances under the facility was generally LIBOR plus a spread (was 0.95% at termination), or based on bids received from the lending group, and the Company paid an annual facility fee (was 15 basis points at termination). Both the spread and the facility fee were dependent on the credit rating of the Company's long-term debt.

On February 2, 2015, the Company entered into an unsecured commercial paper note program in the United States. The Company may borrow up to a maximum of $500.0 million under this program subject to market conditions. The notes will be sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and will rank pari passu with all of the Company's other unsecured senior indebtedness. The Company does not intend to borrow more than $2.0 billion on the commercial paper program and new revolving credit facility combined. As of February 17, 2017, there was a balance of $100.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program. As of December 31, 2016, there was a balance of $20.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program. As of December 31, 2015, there was a balance of $387.3 million on the commercial paper program ($387.5 million in principal outstanding net of an unamortized discount of $0.2 million). The notes bear interest at various floating rates with a weighted average of 0.90% and 0.56% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and a weighted average maturity of 4 days and 19 days as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

As of February 17, 2017, no amounts were outstanding and the amount available on the revolving credit facility was $1.88 billion (net of $20.6 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and net of the $100.0 million outstanding

11

Table of Contents


on the commercial paper program). As of December 31, 2016, the amount available on the revolving credit facility was $1.96 billion (net of $20.6 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and net of the $20.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program). During the year ended December 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 1.37%. As of December 31, 2015, the amount available on the revolving credit facility was $2.07 billion (net of $45.1 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and net of the $387.5 million outstanding on the commercial paper program). During the year ended December 31, 2015, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 1.07%.

Environmental Considerations


See Item 1A. 1A, Risk Factors,for information concerning the potential effects of environmental regulations on our operations.


8


Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

General


References to "EQR" mean Equity Residential, a Maryland real estate investment trust ("REIT"), and references to "ERPOP" mean ERP Operating Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership. Unless otherwise indicated, when used in this section, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP and the term “Operating Partnership” means collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP.

This Item 1A.1A includes forward-looking statements.  You should refer to our discussion of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements included in Item 7, Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.


The occurrence of the events discussed in the following risk factors could adversely affect, possibly in a material manner, our business, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect the value of our common shares of beneficial interest or preferred shares of beneficial interest (which we refer to collectively as “Shares”), Preference Units, OP Units, restricted units and our public unsecured debt.  In this section, we refer to the Shares, Preference Units, OP Units, restricted units and public unsecured debt together as our “securities” and the investors who own such securities as our “security holders”.


Our performance and securities value areholders.”

Risks Related to our Business Strategy

Investing in real estate is inherently subject to risks associated with thethat could negatively impact our business.

Investing in real estate industry.


General

Real property investments areis subject to varying degrees and types of riskrisk. While we seek to mitigate these risks through various strategies, including geographic diversification, market research and proactive asset management, among other techniques, these risks cannot be eliminated. Factors that may impact cash flows and real estate values include, but are relatively illiquid. Numerous factorsnot limited to:

Local economic conditions, particularly oversupply or reductions in demand;

National, regional and local political climates and governmental policies;

The inability or unwillingness of residents to pay rent increases;

Increases in our operating expenses;

Cost of labor and materials required to maintain our properties at acceptable standards;

Availability of attractive financing opportunities;

Changes in social preferences; and

Additional risks that are discussed below.

Competition in multifamily housing may adverselynegatively affect operations and demand for the economic performance and value of ourCompany’s properties and the ability to realize that value. These factors include changes in the global, national, regional and local political and economic climates, local conditions such as an oversupply ofor residents.

Our properties face competition for residents from other existing or new multifamily properties, or a reduction in demand for our multifamily properties, the attractiveness of our properties to residents, competition from other multifamily properties andcondominiums, single family homes (both as rentals and owned housing) and changes in market rental rates. Our performance also depends on our ability to collect rent from residents and to pay for adequate maintenance, insurance and other operating costs, including real estate taxes, all of which could increase over time. These operating expenses could rise faster thanliving arrangements, whether owned or rental, that may attract residents from our revenues causing our incomeproperties or prospective residents that would otherwise choose to decline. In circumstances where we buy or sell properties, including large portfolios of properties, overhead (property management expense and general and administrative expense) may not increase/decrease proportionallylive with the associated changes in revenue. Costs of labor and materials required for maintenance, repair, capital expenditure or development may be more expensive than anticipated. Also, the expenses of owning and operatingus.  As a property are not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as market factors and competition cause a reduction in income from the property.


We may be unable to renew leases or relet units as leases expire.
When our residents decide to leave our apartments,result, we may not be able to relet their apartment units. Evenrenew existing resident leases or enter into new resident leases, or if the residents dowe are able to renew or we can reletenter into new leases, they may be at rates or terms that are less favorable than our current rates or terms, resulting in a material impact on our results of operations.

Failure to generate sufficient revenue could limit our ability to make financing payments or distributions to security holders.

A decrease in cash flows due to declines in rental revenue could negatively affect our ability to make financing payments and distributions to our security holders. Significant expenditures associated with each property, such as real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance costs and employee wages and benefits, may also negatively impact cash flows and not decline as quickly or at the same rate as revenues when circumstances might cause a reduction at our properties.

The short-term nature of apartment units,leases expose us more quickly to the effects of declining market rents, potentially making our revenue more volatile. 

Generally our residential apartment leases are for twelve months or less.  If the terms of the renewal or reletting may beare less favorable than current lease terms. If we are unable to promptly renewterms, then the leases or relet the apartment units, or if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected rates, then ourCompany’s results of operations and financial condition willcould be adverselynegatively affected. If residents do not experience increasesGiven our generally shorter term lease structure, our rental revenues are impacted by declines in their income, we may be unable to increase rent and/or delinquencies may increase. Occupancy levels and market rents may be adversely affected by national and local political, economic and market conditions including, without limitation, new construction and excess inventory of multifamily and owned housing/condominiums, increasing portions of owned housing/condominium stock being converted to rental use, rental housing subsidized by the government, other government programs that favor single family rental housing or owner occupied housing over multifamily rental housing, governmental


12
more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.

9


Table of Contents



regulations, slow or negative employment growth and household formation, the availability of low-interest mortgages or the availability of mortgages requiring little or no down payment for single family home buyers, changes in social preferences and the potential for geopolitical instability, all of which are beyond our control. In addition, various state and local municipalities have enacted and may continue to enact rent control legislation or take other actions which could limit our ability to raise rents. Finally, the federal government's policies, many of which may encourage home ownership, can increase competition and possibly limit our ability to raise rents. Consequently, our cash flow and ability to service debt and make distributions to security holders could be reduced.

The retail/commercial space at our properties primarily serves as an additional amenity for our residents and neighbors. The long term naturegeographic concentration of our retail/commercial leases (generally five to ten years with market based renewal options) and the characteristics of many of our tenants (generally small, local businesses) may subject us to certain risks. We may not be able to lease new space for rents that are consistent with our projections or for market rates. Also, when leases for our existing retail/commercial space expire, the space may not be relet or the terms of reletting, including the cost of allowances and concessions to tenants, may be less favorable than the current lease terms. Our properties compete with other properties with retail/commercial space. The presence of competitive alternatives may affect our ability to lease space and the level of rents we can obtain. If our retail/commercial tenants experience financial distress or bankruptcy, they may fail to comply with their contractual obligations, seek concessions in order to continue operations or cease their operations which could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. The revenues from our retail/commercial space represent approximately 4.5% of our total rental income.


We have increased our concentration of properties in our core markets, which could have an adverse effect on our operations if a particular market is adversely affected by economic or other conditions.

Over the past ten years, the Company has exited its non-core markets as part of its strategy to reposition its portfolio, leaving the Companyoperations.

The Company’s properties are highly concentrated in its six coreour primarily coastal markets.  If any one or more of our core markets (Boston, New York, Washington D.C., Southern California, San Francisco and Seattle) is adversely affectedunfavorably impacted by local or regionalspecific economic conditions, (such as business layoffs, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors) or local real estate conditions, (such as oversupplyincreases in real estate and other taxes, rent control or stabilization laws or localized environmental issues or natural/man-made disasters, the impact of or reduced demand for multifamily properties), such conditions may have an increased adversea more negative impact on our results of operations than if our portfolioproperties were more geographically diverse.


Additionally within its primarily coastal markets, the Company is highly concentrated in certain dense urban and suburban submarkets.  To the extent that these particular submarkets become less desirable to operate in, including changes in multifamily housing supply and demand, our results of operations could be more negatively impacted than if we were more diversified within our markets.  

Operations from new acquisitions, development projects and renovations may fail to perform as expected.

We intend to actively acquire, develop and renovate multifamily operating properties as part of our business strategy.  Newly acquired, developed or renovated properties may not perform as we expect.  We may also overestimate the revenue (or underestimate the expenses) that a new or repositioned project may generate.  The occupancy rates and rents at these properties may fail to meet the expectations underlying our investment.  Development and renovations, in particular, are subject to greater uncertainties and risks due to complexities and lead time in estimating costs.  We may underestimate the costs necessary to operate an acquired property to the standards established for its intended market position.  We may also underestimate the costs to complete a development property or to complete a renovation.  

Competition for acquisitions may prevent us from acquiring properties on favorable terms.

We may not be successful in pursuing acquisition and development opportunities.  We expect that other real estate investors will compete with us for attractive investment opportunities or may also develop properties in markets where we focus our development and acquisition efforts.  We may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms.  

Because real estate investments are illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when appropriate.


Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly.  We may not be able to reconfigure our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions.  We may be unable to consummate such dispositions in a timely manner, on attractive terms, or at all.  In some cases, we may also determine that we will not recover the carrying amount of the property upon disposition.  This inability to reallocate our capital promptly could adverselynegatively affect our financial condition, andincluding our ability to make distributions to our security holders.


New acquisitions, development projects and/or rehabs

The Company’s real estate assets may failbe subject to perform as expectedimpairment charges.

A decline in the fair value of our assets may require us to recognize an impairment against such assets under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) if we were to determine that, with respect to any assets in unrealized loss positions, we do not have the ability and competitionintent to hold such assets for acquisitions may result in increased pricesa period of time sufficient to allow for properties thatrecovery of the amortized cost of such assets. If such a determination were to be made, we would likerecognize unrealized losses through earnings and write-down the amortized cost of such assets to acquire.


We intenda new cost basis, based on the fair value of such assets on the date they are considered to actively acquire, developbe impaired. Such impairment charges reflect non-cash losses at the time of recognition; subsequent disposition or sale of such assets could further affect our future losses or gains, as they are based on the difference between the sale price received and rehab multifamily properties for rental operations as market conditions dictate. We may also acquire multifamily properties thatadjusted amortized cost of such assets at the time of sale. If we are unoccupied or in the early stages of lease up. We may be unablerequired to lease up these apartment properties on schedule, resulting in decreases in expected rental revenues and/or lower yields due to lower occupancy and rental rates as well as higher than expected concessions or higher than expected operating expenses. We may not be able to achieve rents that are consistent with expectations for acquired, developed or rehabbed properties. We may underestimate the costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to standards established for its intended market position, to complete a development property or to complete a rehab. Additionally, we expect that other real estate investors with capital will compete with us for attractive investment opportunities or may also develop properties in markets where we focus our development and acquisition efforts. This competition (or lack thereof) may increase (or depress) prices for multifamily properties. We may not be in a position or have the opportunityrecognize material asset impairment charges in the future, to make suitable property acquisitionsthese charges could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Construction risks on favorable terms. We have acquired in the past and intend to continue to pursue the acquisition of properties, including large portfolios of properties, that could increase our size and result in alterations to our capital structure. The total number of apartment units under development costs of development and estimated completion dates are subject to uncertainties arising from changing economic conditions (such as the cost of labor and construction materials), competition and local government regulation.


In connection with such government regulation, we may incur liability if our properties are not constructed and operated in compliance with the accessibility provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Housing Act or other federal, state or local requirements. Noncompliance could result in fines, subject us to lawsuits and require us to remediate or repair the noncompliance.


13

Table of Contents



Development and construction risksprojects could affect our profitability.

We intend to continue to develop multifamily properties. These activities can includeproperties as part of our business strategy.  Development often includes long planning and entitlement timelines, andsubjecting the project to changes in market conditions. It can involve complex and costly activities, including significant environmental remediation or construction work in high-density urban and close-in suburban areas.our markets.  We may also experience an increase in costs due to general disruptions that affect the cost of labor and/or materials such as trade disputes, tariffs, labor unrest and/or geopolitical conflicts.  We may abandon opportunities (including land that we have optioned for purchase) that we have already begun to explore for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions or increases in construction or financing costs, and as a result, we may fail to recover expenses or option payments already incurred in exploring those opportunities.  The occupancy rates and rents at a propertyWe may fail to meet our original expectations for a number of reasons, including changes in market and economic conditions beyond our control and the development by competitors of competing properties. We mayalso be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, occupancy, or other required governmental or third party permits and authorizations, which

10


Table of Contents

authorizations.  These and other risks inherent in development projects could result in increased costs or the delay or abandonment of opportunities.


We own certain propertiesare subject to ground leases that may limit our use of the properties, restrict our ability to finance, sell or otherwise transfer our interestsrisks involved in these properties and expose us to loss of the properties if such agreements are breached by us or terminated.


The Company owns the building and improvements and leases the land underlying the improvements under several long-term ground leases. These ground leases may impose limitations on our use of the properties, restrict our ability to finance, sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the properties or restrict the leasing of the properties. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the properties, impair the properties' value or negatively impact our ability to find suitable residents for the properties. In addition, we could lose our interests in the properties if the ground leases are breached by us or terminated. Certain of these ground leases have payments subject to annual escalations and/or periodic fair market value adjustments which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Our investments inreal estate activity through joint ventures could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority regarding major decisions, our reliance on our joint venture partners' financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.

ventures.

We currently do and may continue to in the future to develop and acquire properties in joint ventures with other persons or entities when we believe circumstances warrant the use of such structures. We have several jointentities.  Joint ventures with other real estate investors. Joint venture investments involvecreate risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:

The possibility that our partners might refuse to make capital contributions when due and therefore we may be forced to make contributions to protect our investments;


We may be responsible to our partners for indemnifiable losses;

our joint venture partners might experience financial distress, become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which may delay construction or development of a property or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture;

Our partners might at any time have business or economic goals that are inconsistent with ours; and

we may be responsible to our partners for indemnifiable losses;

Our partners may be in a position to take action or withhold consent contrary to our recommendations, instructions or requests.

our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a property that conflict with our business interests and goals, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;
we may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the property or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the property;
our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;
our ability to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted without prior consent of our joint venture partners;
we may disagree with our joint venture partners about decisions affecting a property or the joint venture, which could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and
we may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.

At times we have entered into agreements providing for joint and several liability with our partners.  We also have in the past and could choose in the future to guarantee part of or all of certain joint venture debt.  Frequently, weWe and our respective joint venture partners may each have the right to trigger a buy-sell arrangement whichthat could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire our partners'partner's interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have initiated such a transaction. Anytransaction.  In some instances, joint venture partners may also have competing interests or objectives that could create conflicts of these risksinterest similar to those noted above. These objectives may be contrary to our compliance with the REIT requirements, and our REIT status could materially and adversely affect


14



our ability to generate and recognize attractive returns on our joint ventures do not operate in compliance with those requirements. To the extent our partners do not meet their obligations to us or our joint ventures, or they take actions inconsistent with the interests of the joint venture, investments, whichit could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and distributions to our shareholders.

Several of the assets we acquired in the Archstone transaction along with certain preferred interests acquired in joint ventures as part of the Archstone transaction, as well as certain other tax protected properties we have acquired over the years, are subject to tax protection agreements, which could limit our flexibility with respect to our ownership of such assets or cause us to incur material costs.

Several of the assets we acquired from Archstone Enterprise LP ("Archstone") in February 2013 were contributed to Archstone subject to various agreements limiting the ability of the owner of the property to take actions that would trigger income tax liability for the contributing owner of the property, including a taxable disposition of the property. In addition, we will also be required to maintain a certain amount of qualified nonrecourse financing on the tax protected properties during their respective restricted periods. Our obligations relating to these tax protected properties (as well as certain other tax protected properties we have acquired over the years) may affect the way in which we conduct our business, including whether, when and under what circumstances we sell properties or interests therein and the timing and nature of our financings and refinancing transactions. As a result, we may not be able to dispose of or refinance the tax protected properties when to do so may have otherwise been favorable to us and our shareholders, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Certain preferred interests acquired in joint ventures as part of the Archstone transaction have complex tax requirements that, if violated, may cause us to be required to indemnify the preferred stockholders or our joint venture partner for certain tax protection costs.

Changes in market conditions and volatility of share prices could adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares.

The stock markets, including the New York Stock Exchange, on which we list our Common Shares, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations over time. As a result, the market price of our Common Shares could be similarly volatile, and investors in our Common Shares may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. The market price of our Common Shares may decline or fluctuate significantly in response to many factors, including but not limited to the following:

general political, market and economic conditions;
actual or anticipated variations in our guidance, quarterly operating results or dividends;
changes in our net operating income ("NOI"), earnings, funds from operations or normalized funds from operations estimates;
difficulties or inability to access capital or extend or refinance debt;
large portfolio acquisitions or dispositions;
decreasing (or uncertainty in) real estate valuations;
rising crime rates in markets where our primarily urban and close-in suburban portfolio is concentrated;
a change in analyst and/or credit ratings;
adverse market reaction to any additional debt we incur in the future;
governmental regulatory action, including changes or proposed changes to the mandates of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, and changes in tax laws;
the payment of any special dividends;
the issuance of additional Common Shares, or the perception that such issuances might occur, including under EQR's At-The-Market ("ATM") share offering program; and
the resale of substantial amounts of our common shares, or the anticipation of the resale of such shares, by large holders of our securities.

Issuances or sales of our Common Shares may be dilutive.
The issuance or sale of substantial amounts of our Common Shares, whether directly by us or in the secondary market, the perception that such issuances or sales of our Common Shares could occur or the availability for future issuance or sale of our Common Shares or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our Common Shares could have a dilutive effect on our actual and expected earnings per share, funds from operations (“FFO”) per share and Normalized FFO per share.  The actual amount of dilution cannot be determined at this time and would be dependent upon numerous factors which are not currently known to us.


15




We may not have sufficient cash flows from operations after capital expenditures to cover our distributions and our dividend policy may lead to quicker dividend reductions.

We generally consider our cash flows provided by operating activities after capital expenditures to be adequate to meet operating requirements and payment of regular distributions to our security holders. While our current dividend policy makes it less likely that we will over distribute, it will also lead to a dividend reduction more quickly should operating results deteriorate or large portfolio sales occur. However, whether due to changes in the dividend policy or otherwise, there may be times when we experience shortfalls in our coverage of distributions, which may cause us to consider reducing our distributions and/or using the proceeds from property dispositions or additional financing transactions to make up the difference. Should these shortfalls occur for lengthy periods of time or be material in nature, our financial condition may be adversely affected and we may not be able to maintain our current distribution levels. See Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for additional discussion regarding our dividend policy.

The value of investment securities could result in losses to the Company.

From time to time, the Company holds investment securities and/or cash investments that have various levels of repayment and liquidity risk, including government obligations and bond funds, money market funds or bank deposits. On occasion we also may purchase securities of companies in our own industry as a means to invest funds. There may be times when we experience declines in the value of these investment securities, which may result in losses to the Company and our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected. Sometimes the cash we deposit at a bank substantially exceeds the FDIC insurance limit or we invest cash in money market or similar type funds with investment management institutions that may be subject to, now or in the future, liquidity and/or withdrawal restrictions, resulting in risk to the Company of loss or lack of immediate availability of funds if these banks or institutions fail to meet their obligations.

Any weaknesses identified in our internal control over financial reporting could have an adverse effect on our share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting. If we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our share price.

The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cybersecurity, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our reputation and business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. More specifically, a cyber incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that can include gaining unauthorized access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, including information regarding our residents and employees. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those we have outsourced to third party service providers. In addition, information security risks have generally increased in recent years due to the rise in new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber attacks. Our primary risks that could directly result from the occurrence of a cyber incident include operational interruption, damage to our reputation, damage to our business relationships and private data exposure. We have implemented processes, procedures and controls to help mitigate these risks, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of a risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that our financial results will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

Changes in laws and litigation risk could affect our business.

We are generally not able to pass through to our residents under existing leases any real estate or other federal, state or local taxes. Consequently, any such tax increases may adversely affect our financial condition and limit our ability to make distributions to our security holders.

We may become involved in legal proceedings, including but not limited to, proceedings related to consumer, shareholder, securities, employment, environmental, development, condominium conversion, tort and commercial legal issues that, if decided adversely to or settled by us, could result in liability material to our financial condition or results of operations.


16




Environmental problems are possible and can be costly.

Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at such property. The owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination. These laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from that site.

Substantially all of our properties have been the subject of environmental assessments completed by qualified independent environmental consulting companies. While these environmental assessments have not revealed, nor are we aware of, any environmental liability that our management believes would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity, there can be no assurance that we will not incur such liabilities in the future.

We are aware that some of our properties have lead paint and have implemented an operations and maintenance program at each of those properties. While we do not currently anticipate that we will incur any material liabilities as a result of the presence of lead paint at our properties, there can be no assurance that we will not incur such liabilities in the future.

There have been a number of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties alleging personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold in residential real estate. While we have adopted programs designed to minimize the existence of mold in any of our properties as well as guidelines for promptly addressing and resolving reports of mold to minimize any impact mold might have on our residents or the property, should mold become an issue in the future, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

We cannot be assured that existing environmental assessments of our properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner of any of our properties did not create a material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any of our properties.

Insurance policies can be costly and may not cover all losses, which may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company's property insurance policies provide for a per occurrence deductible of $250,000. Earthquake losses are subject to a 2% deductible in the state of Washington and a 5% deductible in California, applied to the values of the buildings involved in the loss. The Company also typically self-insures a substantial portion of the first $50 million of a property loss in excess of these base deductibles. Should a claim exceed these amounts, it would be 100% covered by insurance. Furthermore, the Company purchased additional coverage in the event that the Company suffers multiple non-catastrophic occurrences with losses from $25 million to $50 million within the same policy year. The Company's general liability and worker's compensation policies at December 31, 2016 provide for a $2.0 million and $1.0 million per occurrence deductible, respectively. These higher deductible and self-insured retention amounts do expose the Company to greater potential for uninsured losses. The Company also has become more susceptible to large losses as it has transformed its portfolio, becoming more concentrated in fewer, more valuable assets over a smaller geographical footprint. Furthermore, the potential impact of climate change, increased severe weather or earthquakes could cause a significant increase in insurance premiums and deductibles, or a decrease in the availability of coverage, either of which could expose the Company to even greater uninsured losses which may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

The Company also has $750.0 million in terrorism insurance coverage, with a $100,000 deductible. This coverage excludes losses from nuclear, biological and chemical attacks. In the event of a terrorist attack impacting one or more of our properties, we could lose the revenues from the property, our capital investment in the property and possibly face liability claims from residents or others suffering injuries or losses.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company's cyber liability insurance policy provides for a $5.0 million policy aggregate limit and a per occurrence deductible of $250,000. Cyber liability insurance generally covers costs associated with the wrongful release, through inadvertent breach or network attack, of personally identifiable information such as social security or credit card numbers. This cyber policy would cover the cost of victim notification, credit monitoring and other crisis response expenses.


17



The Company relies on third party insurance providers for its property, general liability and worker's compensation insurance. While there has yet to be any non-performance by these major insurance providers, should any of them experience liquidity issues or other financial distress, it could negatively impact the Company. In addition, the Company annually assesses its insurance needs based on the cost of coverage and other factors. We may choose to self insure a greater portion of this risk in the future or may choose to have higher deductibles or lesser policy terms.

Damage from catastrophic weather and other natural events and climate change could result in losses to the Company.

Certain of our properties are located in areas that may experience catastrophic weather and other natural events from time to time, including fires, snow or ice storms, windstorms or hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding or other severe weather. These adverse weather and natural events could cause substantial damages or losses to our properties which could exceed our insurance coverage. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property, as well as anticipated future revenue from that property. We could also continue to be obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.

To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, all of which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, including destruction of our properties, or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

In addition, changes in federal and state legislation and regulation on climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties and could also require us to spend more on our new development properties without a corresponding increase in revenue.

The inability of Lehman to fulfill its indemnification obligations to us under the purchase agreement for the Archstone transaction could increase our liabilities and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
In addition to certain indemnification obligations of each party to the purchase agreement for the Archstone transaction relating to breaches of fundamental representations and warranties and breaches of covenants and certain other specified matters, we negotiated as a term in the purchase agreement that Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. ("Lehman") retain responsibility for and indemnify us against damages resulting from certain third-party claims or other liabilities. These third-party claims and other liabilities include, without limitation, costs associated with various litigation matters. Lehman filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in September 2008 and is currently in the process of post-petition liquidation. If Lehman completes its liquidation prior to the termination of their indemnity obligations to us under the purchase agreement, or otherwise distributes substantially all of its assets to its creditors prior to such time, Lehman may not be able to satisfy its obligations with respect to claims and retained liabilities covered by the purchase agreement. The failure of Lehman to satisfy such obligations could have a material adversenegative effect on our results of operations and financial condition, because claimants may successfully assert that we are liable for those claims and/or retained liabilities. In addition, we expect that certain obligations of Lehman to indemnify us will terminate upon expiration of the applicable indemnification period (generally no more than four years following the closing, which will be February 27, 2017). The assertion of third-party claims after the expiration of the applicable indemnification period, or the failure of Lehman to satisfy its indemnification obligations, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. 

Non-performance by our operating counterparties could adversely affect our performance.

We have relationships with and, from time to time, we execute transactions with or receive services from many counterparties. As a result, defaults by counterparties could result in services not being provided, or volatility in the financial markets could affect counterparties' ability to complete transactions with us as intended, both of which could result in disruptionsincluding distributions to our operations that may adversely affectsecurity holders.

Risks Related to our businessFinancing Strategy and results of operations.


Debt financing and preferred shares/preference units could adversely affect our performance.

General

Please refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for the Company's total debt and unsecured debt summaries as of December 31, 2016.


18



In addition to debt, we have a liquidation value of $37.3 million of outstanding preferred shares of beneficial interest/preference units with a dividend preference of 8.29% per annum as of December 31, 2016. Our use of debt and preferred equity financing creates certain risks, including the following:

Capital Structure

Disruptions in the financial markets could adversely affecthinder our ability to obtain debt and equity financing and impact our acquisitions and dispositions.


Dislocations and liquidity disruptions in capital and credit markets could impact liquidityresult in the debt markets, resulting in financing terms that are less attractive to us and/increased costs or the unavailabilitylack of certain typesavailability of debt financing (including under our $1.0 billion commercial paper program) and equity financing. Should the capital and credit markets experience volatility and the availability of funds again become limited, or be available only on unattractive terms, we will incur increased costs associated with issuing debt instruments. In addition, it is possible that our ability to access the capital and credit marketsSuch events may be limited or precluded by these or other factors at a time when we would like, or need, to do so, which would adversely impactaffect our ability to refinance maturingexisting debt, require us to utilize higher cost alternatives and/or reactimpair our ability to adjust to changing economic and business conditions.  Uncertainty in the credit marketsCapital market disruptions could negatively impact our ability to make acquisitions andor make it more difficult or not possible for us to sell properties or may adverselyunfavorably affect the price we receive for properties that we do sell, as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of debt financing or difficulties in obtaining debt financing. Potential continuedsell.  Such disruptions in the financial markets could also have other unknown adverse effects on us or the economy generally and may cause the price of our securities to fluctuate significantly and/or to decline.


Potential reforms to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could adversely affect our performance.

Through their lender originator networks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the "Government Sponsored Enterprises" or "GSEs") are significant lenders and enhancers of tax-exempt bonds both to the Company and to buyers of the Company's properties. The GSEs have a mandate to support multifamily housing through their financing activities. Any changes to their mandates, reductions in their size or the scale of their activities or loss of key personnel could have an impact on the Company and may, among other things, lead to lower values for our assets and higher interest rates on our secured borrowings. Disruptions in the floating rate tax-exempt bond market (where interest rates reset weekly) and in the credit market's perception of the GSEs, which guarantee and provide liquidity for many of these bonds, have been experienced in the past and may be experienced in the future and could result in an increase in interest rates on our tax-exempt debt obligations. These bonds could also be put to our consolidated subsidiaries if the GSEs fail to satisfy their guaranty obligations. While this obligation is in almost all cases non-recourse to us, this could cause the Company to have to repay these obligations on short notice or risk foreclosure actions on the collateralized assets.

Non-performance by our

Our financial counterparties could adversely affect our performance.


may not perform their obligations.

Although we have not experienced any material counterparty non-performance, disruptions in financial and credit markets or other events could among other things, impedeimpair the ability of our counterparties to perform onunder their contractual obligations.obligations to us.  There are multiple financial institutions that are individually committed to lend us varying amounts as part ofprovide borrowings under our revolving credit facility.  Should any of these institutions fail to fundperform their committed amountsobligations when contractually required, our financial condition could be adversely affected. Should several of these institutions fail to fund, we could experience significant financial distress.


Rising interest rates can increase costs.

The Company also has developed assetsis exposed to market risk from financial instruments primarily from changes in market interest rates.  Such risks derive from the refinancing of debt, exposure to interest rate fluctuations in floating rate debt and from derivative instruments utilized to swap fixed rate debt to floating rates or to hedge rates in anticipation of future debt issuances.  Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense and the costs of refinancing existing debt.

Insufficient cash flow could affect our ability to service existing debt and create refinancing risk.

We are subject to risks normally associated with joint venture partners which were financed by financial institutionsdebt financing, including the risk that have experienced varying degreesour cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments.  We may not be able to refinance existing debt and if we can, the terms of distress in the past and could experience similar distress as economic conditions change. If one or more of these lenders fail to fund when contractually required, the Company or its joint venture partnersuch refinancing may be unableless favorable than the terms of existing indebtedness.  Our inability to complete constructionrefinance, extend or repay debt with proceeds from other capital market transactions would negatively impact our financial condition.  If the debt is secured, the mortgage holder may also foreclose on the property.  

11


Table of its development properties.


Contents

A significant downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely affect our performance.


A significant downgrade in our credit ratings, while not affecting our ability to draw proceeds under the Company’s revolving credit facility, would cause ourthe corresponding borrowing costs to increase, under the revolving credit facility, impact our ability to borrow secured and unsecured debt, and potentially impair our ability to access the commercial paper market or otherwise limit our access to capital.  In addition, a downgrade below investment grade would require us to post cash collateral and/or letters of credit in favor of some of our secured lenders to cover our self-insured property and liability insurance deductibles or to obtain lower deductible insurance compliant with the lenders'lenders’ requirements at the lower ratings level.


Scheduled debt payments could adversely affect our financial condition.

In the future, our cash flow could be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest or to pay distributions on our securities at expected levels.

19





We may not be able to refinance existing debt, including joint venture indebtedness (which in virtually all cases requires substantial principal payments at maturity) and, if we can, the terms of such refinancing might not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions, such as new equity capital, our operating cash flow will not be sufficient in all years to repay all maturing debt. As a result, certain of our other debt may cross default, we may be forced to postpone capital expenditures necessary for the maintenance of our properties, we may have to dispose of one or more properties on terms that would otherwise be unacceptable to us or we may be forced to allow the mortgage holder to foreclose on a property. Foreclosure on mortgaged properties or an inability to refinance existing indebtedness would likely have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Please refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for the Company's debt maturity schedule as of December 31, 2016.

Financial covenants could adverselylimit operational flexibility and affect the Company'sour overall financial condition.


position.

The mortgages onterms of our properties may contain customary negative covenants that, among other things, limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the property and to reduce or change insurance coverage. In addition,credit agreements, including our revolving credit facility contains certain restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur debt. Thethe indentures under which a substantial portion of our unsecured debt was issued, also contain certainrequire us to comply with a number of financial covenants. These covenants may limit our flexibility to run our business and operatingbreaches of these covenants including, amongcould result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness and trigger a cross default of other things, maintenance of certain financial ratios, as well as limitations on our ability to incur secured and unsecured debt (including acquisition financing), and to sell all or substantially alldebt.

Some of our assets. Our revolving credit facility and indenturesproperties are cross-defaulted and also contain cross default provisions with other material debt. While the Company believes it was in compliance with its unsecured public debt covenants for both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, should it fall out of compliance, it would likely have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.


Some of the properties were financed with tax-exempt bonds or otherwise contain certain restrictive covenants or deed restrictions, including affordability requirements.requirements, which limit income from certain properties.  The Company and from time to time its consultants, monitormonitors compliance with the restrictive covenants and deed restrictions that affect these properties.  If these compliance requirements restrict our ability to increase our rental rates to low or moderate-income residents, or eligible/qualified residents, then our income from these properties may be limited. While we generally believe that the interest rate benefit attendant tofrom financing properties with tax-exempt bonds more than outweighs any loss of income due to restrictive covenants or deed restrictions, this may not always be the case.  Some of these requirements are complex, and our failure to comply with them may subject us to material fines or liabilities.

Our degree of leverage could limit

We may change the dividend policy for our ability to obtain additional financing.


Our degree of leverage could have important consequences to security holders. For example, the degree of leverage could affect our ability to obtain additional financingsecurities in the future.

The decision to declare and pay dividends on our securities, as well as the timing, amount and composition of any such future dividends, is at the discretion of the Board of Trustees and will depend on actual and projected financial conditions, the Company’s actual and projected liquidity and operating results, the Company’s projected cash needs for working capital, capital expenditures acquisitions, development orand other general corporate purposes, making us more vulnerable to a downturn in business orinvestment activities and such other factors as the economy in general. Our consolidated debt-to-total market capitalization ratio was 26.8% asCompany’s Board of December 31, 2016. In addition,Trustees deems relevant.  The Board of Trustees may modify our most restrictive unsecured public debt covenants are as follows:

  December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Total Debt to Adjusted Total Assets (not to exceed 60%) 35.4% 38.5%
Secured Debt to Adjusted Total Assets (not to exceed 40%) 16.2% 16.5%
Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to  
  
Maximum Annual Service Charges  
  
(must be at least 1.5 to 1) 3.73
 3.67
Total Unsecured Assets to Unsecured Debt  
  
(must be at least 150%) 390.8% 336.8%
Rising interest rates could adversely affect cash flow.

Advances under our revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable rate based upon LIBOR at various interest periods, plus a spread dependent upon the Operating Partnership's credit rating, or based upon bids received from the lending group. Borrowings under our commercial paper program also bear interest at variable rates. Certain public issuances of our senior unsecured debt instruments may also,dividend policy from time to time bear interest at floating rates orand any change in our dividend policy could negatively impact the market price of our securities.

Changes in market conditions and volatility of share prices could decrease the market price of our Common Shares.

The stock markets, including the New York Stock Exchange on which we list our Common Shares, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations over time.  As a result, the market price of our Common Shares could be swapped tosimilarly volatile.  Investors in our Common Shares consequently may experience a floating rate of interest.


20



We may also borrow additional money with variable interest ratesdecrease in the future. Increasesvalue of their shares, including decreases due to this volatility and not necessarily related to our operating performance or prospects.  Additionally, the market price of our Common Shares may decline or fluctuate significantly in interest rates would increaseresponse to the sale of substantial amounts of our interest expense under these debt instrumentsCommon Shares, or the anticipation of the sale of such shares, by large holders of our securities.  The issuance of additional Common Shares by the Company, or the perception that such issuances might occur, could also cause significant volatility and would increase the costs of refinancing existing debt and of issuing new debt. Accordingly, higher interest rates could adversely affect cash flow and our ability to service our debt and make distributions to security holders.

Derivatives and hedging activity could adversely affect cash flow.

In the normal course of business, we use derivatives to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility on debt instruments, including hedging for future debt issuances. At other times we may utilize derivatives to increase our exposure to floating interest rates. We may also use derivatives to manage commodity pricesdecreases in the daily operationsvalue of our business. There can be no assurance that these hedging arrangements will have the desired beneficial impact. These arrangements, which can include a number of counterparties, may expose us to additional risks, including failure of anyshares.

Issuances or sales of our counterpartiesCommon Shares or Units may be dilutive.

Any potential additional issuance of Common Shares or OP Units would reduce the percentage of our Common Shares and OP Units owned by investors. In most circumstances, shareholders and unitholders will not be entitled to perform under these contracts,vote on whether or not we issue additional Common Shares or Units. In addition, depending on the terms and may involve extensive costs, suchpricing of additional offerings of our Common Shares or Units along with the value of our properties, our shareholders and unitholders could experience dilution in both book value and fair value of their Common Shares or Units, as transaction fees or breakage costs, if we terminate them. No strategy can completely insulate uswell as dilution in our actual and expected earnings per share, funds from the risks associated with interest rate or commodity pricing fluctuations.


operations (“FFO”) per share and Normalized FFO per share.

General Risks

We depend on our key personnel.


We depend on the efforts of the Chairmanour trustees and executive officers.  If one or more of our Board of Trustees, Samuel Zell, and our executive officers, particularly David J. Neithercut, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). If theythem resign or otherwise cease to be employed by us, our business and results of operations and financial condition could be temporarily adversely affected.  Mr. Zell

12


Table of Contents

The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cybersecurity, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our reputation and business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.

A cyber incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that can include gaining unauthorized access to systems to disrupt payment collections and operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, including information regarding our residents, prospective residents, employees and employees’ dependents.  

Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures, required employee awareness training and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our internal information technology systems, our systems and systems maintained by third party vendors with which we do business are vulnerable to damage from any number of sources.  We face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to emails, phishing attempts or other scams, persons inside our organization or persons/vendors with access to our systems and other significant disruptions of our information technology networks and related systems, including property infrastructure.  Our information technology networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-to-day operations.  Even the most well-protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected.  Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.  

We collect and hold personally identifiable information of our residents and prospective residents in connection with our leasing activities, and we collect and hold personally identifiable information of our employees and their dependents.  In addition, we engage third party service providers that may have access to such personally identifiable information in connection with providing necessary information technology, security and other business services to us.  The systems of our third party service providers may contain defects in design or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise personally identifiable information.  Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our information technology networks and those of our third party providers and we have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging.

We address potential breaches or disclosure of this confidential personally identifiable information by implementing a variety of security measures intended to protect the confidentiality and security of this information including (among others):  (a) engaging reputable, recognized firms to help us design and maintain our information technology and data security systems; (b) conducting periodic testing and verification of information and data security systems, including performing ethical hacks of our systems to discover where any vulnerabilities may exist; and (c) providing periodic employee awareness training around phishing and other scams, malware and other cyber risks.  The Company also has entered into retirement benefita cyber liability insurance policy to provide some coverage for certain risks arising out of data and noncompetition agreementsnetwork breaches and data privacy regulations which provides a policy aggregate limit and a per occurrence deductible.  Cyber liability insurance generally covers, among other things, costs associated with the Company.


Shareholders'wrongful release, through inadvertent breach or network attack, of personally identifiable information.  However, there can be no assurance that these measures will prevent a cyber incident or that our cyber liability insurance coverage will be sufficient in the event of a cyber incident.

A breach or significant and extended disruption in the function of our systems, including our primary website, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose residents and revenues, result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, generate third party claims, result in the unintended and/or unauthorized public disclosure or the misappropriation of proprietary, personally identifiable and confidential information and require us to incur significant expenses to address and remediate or otherwise resolve these kinds of issues.  We may not be able to recover these expenses in whole or in any part from our service providers, our insurers or any other responsible parties.  As a result, there can be no assurance that our financial results would not be negatively impacted.

Litigation risk could affect our business.

We may become involved in legal proceedings, claims, actions, inquiries and investigations in the ordinary course of business. These legal proceedings may include, but are not limited to, proceedings related to consumer, shareholder, securities, employment, environmental, development, condominium conversion, tort, eviction and commercial legal issues.  Litigation can be lengthy and expensive, and it can divert management's attention and resources. Results cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable outcome in litigation could result in liability material to our financial condition or results of operations.

13


Table of Contents

Insurance policies can be costly and may not cover all losses, which may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

The Company’s property, general liability and workers compensation insurance policies provide coverage with substantial per occurrence deductibles and/or self-insured retentions.  These self-insurance retentions can be a material portion of insurance losses in excess of the base deductibles.  While the Company has previously purchased incremental insurance coverage in the event of multiple non-catastrophic occurrences within the same policy year, these substantial deductible and self-insured retention amounts do expose the Company to greater potential for uninsured losses and this additional multiple occurrences coverage may not be available at all or on commercially reasonable terms in the future.  We believe the policy specifications and insured limits of these policies are adequate and appropriate; however, there are certain types of extraordinary losses which may not be adequately covered under our insurance program.  As a result, our financial results could be adversely affected and may vary significantly from period to period.

The Company relies on third party insurance providers for its property, general liability, workers compensation and other insurance, and should any of them experience liquidity issues or other financial distress, it could negatively impact their ability to pay claims under the Company’s policies.  

Earthquake risk:  Our policies insuring against earthquake losses have substantial deductibles which are applied to the values of the buildings involved in the loss.  With the geographic concentration of our properties, a single earthquake affecting a market may have a significant negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  We cannot assure that an earthquake would not cause damage or losses greater than insured levels.  In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property or market, as well as anticipated future revenue.

Terrorism risk:  The Company has terrorism insurance coverage which excludes losses from nuclear, biological and chemical attacks.  In the event of a terrorist attack impacting one or more of our properties, we could lose the revenues from the property, our capital investment in the property and possibly face liability claims from residents or others suffering injuries or losses.

Catastrophic weather risk:  Our properties may be located in areas that could experience catastrophic weather and other natural disasters from time to time, including wildfires, snow or ice storms, windstorms or hurricanes, flooding or other severe weather.  This severe weather and natural disasters could cause substantial damages or losses to our properties which may not be covered or could exceed our insurance coverage.  Exposure to this risk could also result in a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions.  

Climate change risk: To the extent that significant changes in controlthe climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience severe weather, which may result in physical damage to or decrease the demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, significant property damage or destruction of our properties could result.  In addition, climate change could cause a significant increase in insurance premiums and deductibles or a decrease in the availability of coverage, either of which could expose the Company is limited.


to even greater uninsured losses. Our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, changes in federal, state and local legislation and regulation based on concerns about climate change could result in increased capital expenditures on our existing properties and our new development properties.

Provisions of our declarationDeclaration of trustTrust and bylawsBylaws could inhibit changes in control.


Certain provisions of our Declaration of Trust and Bylaws may delay or prevent a change in control of the Company or other transactions that could provide the security holders with a premium over the then-prevailing market price of their securities or which might otherwise be in the best interest of our security holders.  This includes the 5% Ownership Limit described below.below in this Item 1A.  While our existing preferred shares/preference units do not have all of these provisions, any future series of preferred shares/preference units may have certain voting provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control or other transactions that might otherwise be in the interest of our security holders.  Our Bylaws require certain information to be provided by any security holder, or persons acting in concert with such security holder, who proposes business or a nominee at an annual meeting of shareholders, including disclosure of information related to hedging activities and investment strategies with respect to our securities.  These requirements could delay or prevent a change in control or other transactions that might otherwise be in the interest of our security holders.


  The Board of Trustees may use its powers to issue preferred shares and to set the terms of such securities to delay or prevent a change in control of the Company even if a change in control were in the interest of the security holders.

Regulatory and Tax Risks

The adoption of, or changes, in rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations and eviction laws and regulations in our markets could have an adverse effect on our operations and property values.

Various state and local governments have enacted and may continue to enact rent control or rent stabilization laws and regulations which could limit our ability to raise rents or charge certain fees, either of which could have a retroactive effect. We continue to see increases in governments considering or being urged by advocacy groups to consider rent control or rent stabilization

14


Table of Contents

laws and regulations.  These regulations may also make changes to eviction and other tenants’ rights laws and regulations that could have an adverse impact on our operations and property values.  In June 2019, the State of New York enacted rent control regulations known as the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019.  In October 2019, the State of California enacted rent control regulations known as the Tenant Protection Act of 2019.

Compliance or failure to comply with regulatory requirements could result in substantial costs.

Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements and federal, state and local accessibility requirements, including and in addition to those imposed by the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. Noncompliance could result in fines, subject us to lawsuits and require us to remediate or repair the noncompliance. Existing requirements could change and compliance with future requirements may require significant unanticipated expenditures that could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Environmental problems are possible and can be costly.

Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require current or previous owners or operators of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances at such properties.  The owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination.  These laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants.  Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred.  Third parties may also sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from that site.  We cannot be assured that existing environmental assessments of our properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner of any of our properties did not create a material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any of our properties.

Changes in U.S. accounting standards may materially and adversely affect the reporting of our operations.

The Company follows GAAP, which is established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), an independent body whose standards are recognized by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as authoritative for publicly held companies.  The FASB and the SEC create and interpret accounting standards and may issue new accounting pronouncements or change the interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements.  These changes could have a material impact on our reported consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Any weaknesses identified in our internal control over financial reporting could result in a decrease of our share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting.  If we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could have a negative impact on our share price.

Our failure to qualify as a REIT would have serious adverse consequences to our security holders.

We plan to continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT.  Many of these requirements, for which there is limited judicial and administrative interpretation, however, are highly technical and complex.  Therefore, we cannot guarantee that we have qualified or will qualify as a REIT in the future.  The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters that may not be totally within our control.  To qualify as a REIT, our assets must be substantially comprised of real estate assets as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and related guidance and our gross income must generally come from rental and other real estate or passive related sources that are itemized in the REIT tax laws.  We are also required to distribute to security holders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income excluding net capital gains.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates (including, for years prior to 2018, any alternative minimum tax) and would have to pay significant income taxes unless the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) granted us relief under certain statutory provisions.  In addition, we would remain disqualified from taxation as a REIT for four years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT.  We would therefore have less money available for investments or for distributions to security holders and would no longer be required to make distributions to security holders.  This would likely have a significant negative impact on the value of our securities.  

In addition, certain of our subsidiary entities have elected to be taxed as REITs.  As such, each must separately satisfy all of the requirements to qualify for REIT status.  If a subsidiary REIT did not satisfy such requirements, and certain relief provisions did not apply, it would be taxed as a regular corporation and its income would be subject to U.S. federal income taxation.   Failure to comply with these complex REIT rules at the subsidiary REIT level can have a material and detrimental impact to EQR’s REIT status.

15


Table of Contents

Gain on disposition of assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business is subject to 100% tax.

Any gain resulting from transfers of properties we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a prohibited transaction subject to a 100% penalty tax.  We do not believe that our transfers or disposals of property are prohibited transactions.  However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction.  The IRS may contend that certain transfers or dispositions of properties by us or contributions of properties are prohibited transactions.  While we believe the IRS would not prevail in any such dispute, if the IRS were to argue successfully that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited transaction, we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction.  In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT.

We may be subject to legislative or regulatory tax changes that could negatively impact our financial condition.

At any time, U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be enacted or amended. We cannot predict if or when any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, IRS and U.S. Department of Treasury regulations or administrative guidance, will be adopted or become effective and any such law, regulation or interpretation may take effect retroactively.  The Company and our shareholders could be negatively impacted by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulations or administrative guidance.

Distribution requirements may limit our flexibility to manage our portfolio.

In order to maintain qualification as a REIT under the Code, a REIT must annually distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, excluding the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on amounts, if any, by which distributions we pay in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our net capital gains and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.  We may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the 90% distribution requirement. We may be required from time to time, under certain circumstances, to accrue as income for tax purposes interest and rent earned but not yet received.  We may incur a reduction in tax depreciation without a reduction in capital expenditures.  Difficulties in meeting the 90% distribution requirement might arise due to competing demands for our funds or due to timing differences between tax reporting and cash distributions, because deductions may be disallowed, income may be reported before cash is received, expenses may have to be paid before a deduction is allowed or because the IRS may make a determination that adjusts reported income.  In addition, gain from the sale of property may exceed the amount of cash received on a leverage-neutral basis.  A substantial increase to our taxable income may reduce the flexibility of the Company to manage its portfolio through dispositions of properties other than through tax deferred transactions or cause the Company to borrow funds or liquidate investments on unfavorable terms in order to meet these distribution requirements. If we fail to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, we would cease to be taxed as a REIT, resulting in substantial tax-related liabilities.

We have a share ownership limit for REIT tax purposes.


To remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding Shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of any year.  To facilitate maintenance of our REIT qualification, our Declaration of Trust, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits ownership by any single shareholder of more than 5%five percent of the lesser of the number or value of any outstanding class of common or preferred shares. We refer to this restriction as theshares (the “Ownership Limit.”Limit”). Absent anyan exemption or waiver granted by our Board of Trustees, securities acquired or held in violation of the Ownership Limit will be transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary, and the security holder'sholder’s rights to distributions and to vote would terminate.  A transfer of Shares may be void if it causes a person to violate the Ownership Limit.  The Ownership Limit could delay or prevent a change in control and, therefore, could adversely affect our security holders'holders’ ability to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for their Shares.  To reduce the ability of the Board to use the Ownership Limit as an anti-takeover device, the Company'sCompany’s Ownership Limit requires, rather than permits, the Board to grant a waiver of the Ownership Limit if the individual seeking a waiver demonstrates that such ownership would not jeopardize the Company'sCompany’s status as a REIT.  We have issued several of these waivers in the past.


Our preferred shares

Tax elections regarding distributions may affect changes in control.


Our Declaration of Trust authorizes the Board of Trustees to issue up to 100 million preferred shares, and to establish the preferences and rights (including the right to vote and the right to convert into common shares) of any preferred shares issued. The Board of Trustees may use its powers to issue preferred shares and to set the terms of such securities to delay or prevent a change in controlimpact future liquidity of the Company even if a change in control wereor our shareholders.

Under certain circumstances we have made and/or may consider making in the interestfuture, a tax election to treat future distributions to shareholders as distributions in the current year.  This election, which is provided for in the Code, may allow us to avoid increasing our dividends or paying additional income taxes in the current year.  However, this could result in a constraint on our ability to decrease our dividends in future years without creating risk of security holders.


21
either violating the REIT distribution requirements or generating additional income tax liability.

In order to retain liquidity and continue to satisfy the REIT distribution requirements, the Company could issue shares rather than pay a dividend entirely in cash to shareholders. The IRS has published several rulings which have allowed REITs to offer shareholders the choice between shares or cash as a form of payment of a dividend (an “elective stock dividend”).  However, REITs

16





are also permitted to limit the amount of cash paid to all shareholders to 20% of the total dividend paid.  Therefore, it is possible that the total tax burden to shareholders resulting from an elective stock dividend may exceed the amount of cash received by the shareholder.

Inapplicability of Maryland law limiting certain changes in control.


Certain provisions of Maryland law applicable to real estate investment trustsREITs prohibit “business combinations” (including certain issuances of equity securities) with any person who beneficially owns ten percent or more of the voting power of outstanding securities, or with an affiliate who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of ten percent or more of the voting power of the Company'sCompany’s outstanding voting securities (an “Interested Shareholder”), or with an affiliate of an Interested Shareholder.  These prohibitions last for five years after the most recent date on which the Interested Shareholder became an Interested Shareholder.  After the five-year period, a business combination with an Interested Shareholder must be approved by two super-majority shareholder votes unless, among other conditions, holders of common shares receive a minimum price for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the Interested Shareholder for its common shares.  As permitted by Maryland law, however, the Board of Trustees of the Company has opted out of these restrictions with respect to any business combination involving Mr.Sam Zell and certain of his affiliates and persons acting in concert with them.  Consequently, the five-year prohibition and the super-majority vote requirements will not apply to a business combination involving us and/or any of them.  Such business combinations may not be in the best interest of our security holders.


Our status as a REIT is dependent on compliance with federal income tax requirements.

Our failure to qualify as a REIT would have serious adverse consequences to our security holders.

We believe that we have qualified for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes since our taxable year ended December 31, 1992 based, in part, upon opinions of tax counsel received whenever we have issued equity securities or engaged in significant merger transactions. We plan to continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. We cannot, therefore, guarantee that we have qualified or will qualify as a REIT in the future. The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters that may not be totally within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, our gross income must generally come from rental and other real estate or passive related sources that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. We are also required to distribute to security holders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income excluding net capital gains. The fact that we hold our assets through the Operating Partnership further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. In addition, certain of our subsidiary entities have elected to be taxed as REITs. As such, each must separately satisfy all of the requirements to qualify for REIT status. Our failure to comply with the complex REIT rules at the subsidiary REIT level can materially and adversely impact EQR's REIT status.

Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status; however, the REIT qualification rules permit REITs in certain circumstances to pay a monetary penalty for inadvertent mistakes rather than lose REIT status. There is also risk that Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT. We do not believe, however, that any pending or proposed tax law changes would jeopardize our REIT status.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. Also, unless the IRS granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we would remain disqualified from taxation as a REIT for four years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would have to pay significant income taxes. We therefore would have less money available for investments or for distributions to security holders. This would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities. In addition, we would no longer be required to make any distributions to security holders. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we are and will continue to be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property. In addition, various business activities which generate income that is not qualifying income for a REIT are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries and will be subject to federal and state income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent they generate taxable income.

We could be disqualified as a REIT or have to pay taxes if our merger partners did not qualify as REITs.

If any of our prior merger partners had failed to qualify as a REIT throughout the duration of their existence, then they might have had undistributed “Subchapter C corporation earnings and profits” at the time of their merger with us. If that were the case and we did not distribute those earnings and profits prior to the end of the year in which the merger took place, we might not qualify as a REIT. We believe, based in part upon opinions of legal counsel received pursuant to the terms of our merger agreements as well as our own investigations, among other things, that each of our prior merger partners qualified as a REIT and that, in any event, none of them had any undistributed “Subchapter C corporation earnings and profits” at the time of their merger with us. If any of our prior merger partners failed to qualify as a REIT, an additional concern would be that they could have been required to recognize taxable gain at the time they merged with us. We would be liable for the tax on such gain. We also could

22



have to pay corporate income tax on any gain existing at the time of the applicable merger on assets acquired in the merger if the assets are sold within ten years of the merger.

Compliance with REIT distribution requirements may affect our financial condition and our shareholders' liquidity.

Distribution requirements may increase the indebtedness of the Company.

We may be required from time to time, under certain circumstances, to accrue as income for tax purposes interest and rent earned but not yet received. In such event, or upon our repayment of principal on debt, we could have taxable income without sufficient cash to enable us to meet the distribution requirements of a REIT. Accordingly, we could be required to borrow funds or liquidate investments on adverse terms in order to meet these distribution requirements.

Tax elections regarding distributions may impact future liquidity of the Company or our shareholders.

Under certain circumstances we have made and/or may consider making again in the future, a tax election to treat future distributions to shareholders as distributions in the current year. This election, which is provided for in the Internal Revenue Code, may allow us to avoid increasing our dividends or paying additional income taxes in the current year. However, this could result in a constraint on our ability to decrease our dividends in future years without creating risk of either violating the REIT distribution requirements or generating additional income tax liability.

The Internal Revenue Service has published several rulings that allow REITs to offer shareholders the choice of stock or cash with respect to the receipt of a dividend (an "elective stock dividend"). However, REITs are also permitted to limit the amount of cash paid to all shareholders to 20% of the total dividend paid. Therefore, it is possible that the total tax burden to shareholders resulting from an elective stock dividend may exceed the amount of cash received by the shareholder.

Federal Income Tax Considerations

General

The following discussion summarizes the federal income tax considerations material to a holder of common shares. It is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations. For example, it does not give a detailed discussion of any state, local or foreign tax considerations. The following discussion also does not address all tax matters that may be relevant to prospective shareholders in light of their particular circumstances. Moreover, it does not address all tax matters that may be relevant to shareholders who are subject to special treatment under the tax laws, such as insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, financial institutions or broker-dealers, foreign corporations, persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States and persons who own shares through a partnership or other entity treated as a flow-through entity for federal income tax purposes.

The specific tax attributes of a particular shareholder could have a material impact on the tax considerations associated with the purchase, ownership and disposition of common shares. Therefore, it is essential that each prospective shareholder consult with his or her own tax advisors with regard to the application of the federal income tax laws to the shareholder's personal tax situation, as well as any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction.

The information in this section is based on the current Internal Revenue Code, current, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, the legislative history of the Internal Revenue Code, current administrative interpretations and practices of the Internal Revenue Service, including its practices and policies as set forth in private letter rulings, which are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, and existing court decisions. Future legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations and court decisions could change current law or adversely affect existing interpretations of current law. Any change could apply retroactively. Thus, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service could challenge the statements in this discussion, which do not bind the Internal Revenue Service or the courts, and that a court could agree with the Internal Revenue Service.
Comprehensive tax reform

The potential enactment of comprehensive U.S. federal tax reform legislation may adversely impact the taxation of the REIT, its subsidiaries or its shareholders. Tax reform legislation could result in a material increase in both our federal and state tax liabilities and may change the size and tax character of our distributions in a way that increases our shareholders' tax liabilities as compared to current law or requires the Company to distribute more than it otherwise would have. In addition, comprehensive tax reform could increase the complexity of our compliance efforts and increase tax compliance costs and could have a material impact on our operations.

23





Our taxation

We elected REIT status beginning with the year that ended December 31, 1992. In any year in which we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our REIT taxable income or capital gain that we distribute to our shareholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the double taxation that applies to most corporations, which pay a tax on their income and then distribute dividends to shareholders who are in turn taxed on the amount they receive. We elected taxable REIT subsidiary status for certain of our corporate subsidiaries engaged in activities which cannot be performed directly by a REIT, such as condominium conversion and sale activities. As a result, we will be subject to federal income tax on the taxable income generated by these activities in our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

We will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates upon our REIT taxable income or capital gains that we do not distribute to our shareholders. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% excise tax if we do not satisfy specific REIT distribution requirements. We could also be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on our items of tax preference. In addition, any net income from “prohibited transactions” (i.e., dispositions of property, other than property held by a taxable REIT subsidiary, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business) will be subject to a 100% tax. We could also be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain payments received from or on certain expenses deducted by a taxable REIT subsidiary if any such transaction is not respected by the Internal Revenue Service. If we fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test (described below) but have maintained our qualification as a REIT because we satisfied certain other requirements, we will still generally be subject to a 100% penalty tax on the taxable income attributable to the gross income that caused the income test failure. If we fail to satisfy any of the REIT asset tests (described below) by more than a de minimis amount, due to reasonable cause, and we nonetheless maintain our REIT qualification because of specified cure provisions, we will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest marginal corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets. If we fail to satisfy any provision of the Internal Revenue Code that would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT (other than a violation of the REIT gross income or asset tests described below) and the violation is due to reasonable cause, we may retain our REIT qualification but we will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure. Moreover, we may be subject to taxes in certain situations and on certain transactions that we do not presently contemplate.

We believe that we have qualified as a REIT for all of our taxable years beginning with 1992. We also believe that our current structure and method of operation is such that we will continue to qualify as a REIT. However, given the complexity of the REIT qualification requirements, we cannot provide any assurance that the actual results of our operations have satisfied or will satisfy the requirements under the Internal Revenue Code for a particular year.

If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and the relief provisions described herein do not apply, we will be subject to tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We also may be subject to the corporate “alternative minimum tax.” As a result, our failure to qualify as a REIT would significantly reduce the cash we have available to distribute to our shareholders. Unless entitled to statutory relief, we would not be able to re-elect to be taxed as a REIT until our fifth taxable year after the year of disqualification. It is not possible to state whether we would be entitled to statutory relief.

Our qualification and taxation as a REIT depend on our ability to satisfy various requirements under the Internal Revenue Code. We are required to satisfy these requirements on a continuing basis through actual annual operating and other results. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to operate in a manner so as to remain qualified as a REIT.

Ownership of Taxable REIT Subsidiaries by Us. The Internal Revenue Code provides that REITs may own greater than ten percent of the voting power and value of the securities of a “taxable REIT subsidiary” or “TRS”, provided that the aggregate value of all of the TRS securities held by the REIT does not exceed 25% of the REIT's total asset value (20% for taxable years beginning January 1, 2018). TRSs are corporations subject to tax as a regular “C” corporation that have elected, jointly with a REIT, to be a TRS. Generally, a taxable REIT subsidiary may own assets that cannot otherwise be owned by a REIT and can perform impermissible tenant services (discussed below), which would otherwise taint our rental income under the REIT income tests. However, the REIT will be obligated to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that we receive or on certain expenses deducted by our TRSs if the economic arrangements between us, our tenants and the TRS are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties. A TRS may also receive income from prohibited transactions without incurring the 100% federal income tax liability imposed on REITs. Income from prohibited transactions may include the purchase and sale of land, the purchase and sale of completed development properties and the sale of condominium units.

TRSs pay federal and state income tax at the full applicable corporate rates. The amount of taxes paid on impermissible tenant services income and the sale of real estate held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business may be

24



material in amount. The TRSs will attempt to reduce, if possible, the amount of these taxes, but we cannot guarantee whether, or the extent to which, measures taken to reduce these taxes will be successful. To the extent that these companies are required to pay taxes, less cash may be available for distributions to shareholders.

Share Ownership Test and Organizational Requirement. In order to qualify as a REIT, our shares of beneficial interest must be held by a minimum of 100 persons for at least 335 days of a taxable year that is 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Also, not more than 50% in value of our shares of beneficial interest may be owned directly or indirectly by applying certain constructive ownership rules, by five or fewer individuals during the last half of each taxable year. In addition, we must meet certain other organizational requirements, including, but not limited to, that (i) the beneficial ownership in us is evidenced by transferable shares and (ii) we are managed by one or more trustees. We believe that we have satisfied all of these tests and all other organizational requirements and that we will continue to do so in the future. In order to ensure compliance with the 100 person test and the 50% share ownership test discussed above, we have placed certain restrictions on the transfer of our shares that are intended to prevent further concentration of share ownership. However, such restrictions may not prevent us from failing these requirements, and thereby failing to qualify as a REIT.

Gross Income Tests. To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income tests:

(1)At least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year must generally be derived directly or indirectly from rents from real property, interest on obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property, gain from the sale or other disposition of non-dealer real property and shares of REIT stock, dividends paid by another REIT and from some types of temporary investments (excluding certain hedging income).
(2)At least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year must generally be derived from sources qualifying under the 75% test described in (1) above, non-REIT dividends, non-real estate mortgage interest and gain from the sale or disposition of non-REIT stock or securities (excluding certain hedging income).

To qualify as rents from real property for the purpose of satisfying the gross income tests, rental payments must generally be received from unrelated persons and not be based on the net income of the resident. Also, the rent attributable to personal property must not exceed 15% of the total rent. We may generally provide services to residents without “tainting” our rental income only if such services are “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of real property and not otherwise considered “impermissible services”. If such services are impermissible, then we may generally provide them only if they are considered de minimis in amount, or are provided through an independent contractor from whom we derive no revenue and that meets other requirements, or through a taxable REIT subsidiary. We believe that services provided to residents by us either are usually or customarily rendered in connection with the rental of real property and not otherwise considered impermissible, or, if considered impermissible services, will meet the de minimis test or will be provided by an independent contractor or taxable REIT subsidiary. However, we cannot provide any assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with these positions.

If we fail to satisfy one or both of the gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for the year if we are entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. In this case, a penalty tax would still be applicable as discussed above. Generally, it is not possible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions and in the event these relief provisions do not apply, we will not qualify as a REIT.

Asset Tests. In general, on the last day of each quarter of our taxable year, we must satisfy five tests relating to the nature of our assets:

(1)At least 75% of the value of our total assets must consist of real estate assets (which include for this purpose shares in other real estate investment trusts) and certain cash related items;
(2)Not more than 25% of the value of our total assets may consist of securities other than those in the 75% asset class;
(3)Except for securities included in item 1 above, equity investments in other REITs, qualified REIT subsidiaries (i.e., corporations owned 100% by a REIT that are not TRSs or REITs), or taxable REIT subsidiaries: (a) the value of any one issuer's securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets and (b) we may not own securities representing more than 10% of the voting power or value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer;
(4)Not more than 25% of the value of our total assets may consist of securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries (20% for taxable years beginning January 1, 2018); and
(5)Not more than 25% of the value of our total assets may be represented by nonqualified publicly offered REIT debt instruments.

25



The 10% value test described in clause (3)(b) above does not apply to nonqualified publicly offered REIT debt instruments or to certain securities that fall within a safe harbor under the Code. Under the safe harbor, the following are not considered “securities” held by us for purposes of this 10% value test: (i) straight debt securities, (ii) any loan of an individual or an estate, (iii) certain rental agreements for the use of tangible property, (iv) any obligation to pay rents from real property, (v) any security issued by a state or any political subdivision thereof, foreign government or Puerto Rico only if the determination of any payment under such security is not based on the profits of another entity or payments on any obligation issued by such other entity, or (vi) any security issued by a REIT. The timing and payment of interest or principal on a security qualifying as straight debt may be subject to a contingency provided that (A) such contingency does not change the effective yield to maturity, not considering a de minimis change which does not exceed the greater of ¼ of 1% or 5% of the annual yield to maturity or we own $1,000,000 or less of the aggregate issue price or value of the particular issuer's debt and not more than 12 months of unaccrued interest can be required to be prepaid or (B) the contingency is consistent with commercial practice and the contingency is effective upon a default or the exercise of a prepayment right by the issuer of the debt. If we hold indebtedness from any issuer, including a REIT, the indebtedness will be subject to, and may cause a violation of, the asset tests, unless it is a qualifying real estate asset or otherwise satisfies the above safe harbor. We currently own equity interests in certain entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs for federal income tax purposes and are not publicly traded. If any such entity were to fail to qualify as a REIT, we would not meet the 10% voting stock limitation and the 10% value limitation and we would, unless certain relief provisions applied, fail to qualify as a REIT. We believe that we and each of the REITs we own an interest in have and will comply with the foregoing asset tests for REIT qualification. However, we cannot provide any assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with our determinations.

If we fail to satisfy the 5% or 10% asset tests described above after a 30-day cure period provided in the Internal Revenue Code, we will be deemed to have met such tests if the value of our non-qualifying assets is de minimis (i.e., does not exceed the lesser of 1% of the total value of our assets at the end of the applicable quarter or $10,000,000) and we dispose of the non-qualifying assets within six months after the last day of the quarter in which the failure to satisfy the asset tests is discovered. For violations due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect that are in excess of the de minimis exception described above, we may avoid disqualification as a REIT under any of the asset tests, after the 30-day cure period, by disposing of sufficient assets to meet the asset test within such six month period, paying a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets and disclosing certain information to the Internal Revenue Service. If we cannot avail ourselves of these relief provisions, or if we fail to timely cure any noncompliance with the asset tests, we would cease to qualify as a REIT.

Annual Distribution Requirements. To qualify as a REIT, we are generally required to distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to our shareholders each year in an amount at least equal to 90% of our REIT taxable income. These distributions must be paid either in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our tax return for the prior year and if paid with or before the first regular dividend payment date after the declaration is made. We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy our annual distribution requirements. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, as adjusted, we are subject to tax on these amounts at regular corporate rates. We will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of amounts actually distributed and amounts retained for which federal income tax was paid, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of: (1) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year; (2) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year; and (3) any undistributed taxable income from prior taxable years. A REIT may elect to retain rather than distribute all or a portion of its net capital gains and pay the tax on the gains. In that case, a REIT may elect to have its shareholders include their proportionate share of the undistributed net capital gains in income as long-term capital gains and receive a credit for their share of the tax paid by the REIT. For purposes of the 4% excise tax described above, any retained amounts would be treated as having been distributed.

Ownership of Partnership Interests By Us. As a result of our ownership of the Operating Partnership, we will be considered to own and derive our proportionate share of the assets and items of income of the Operating Partnership, respectively, for purposes of the REIT asset and income tests, including its share of assets and items of income of any subsidiaries that are partnerships or limited liability companies.

State and Local Taxes. We may be subject to state or local taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in which we transact business or reside. Generally REITs have seen increases in state and local taxes in recent years. Our state and local tax treatment may not conform to the federal income tax treatment discussed above and any changes in the federal tax code may not be adopted by the states, potentially leading to material tax liabilities for the Company and its shareholders. Consequently, prospective shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on an investment in common shares.



26



Taxation of domestic shareholders subject to U.S. tax

General. If we qualify as a REIT, distributions made to our taxable domestic shareholders with respect to their common shares, other than capital gain distributions and distributions attributable to taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be treated as ordinary income to the extent that the distributions come out of earnings and profits. These distributions will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for shareholders that are corporations nor will they constitute “qualified dividend income” under the Internal Revenue Code, meaning that such dividends will be taxed at marginal rates applicable to ordinary income rather than the special capital gain rates currently applicable to qualified dividend income distributed to shareholders who satisfy applicable holding period requirements. In determining whether distributions are out of earnings and profits, we will allocate our earnings and profits first to preferred shares and second to the common shares. The portion of ordinary dividends which represent ordinary dividends we receive from a TRS, will be designated as “qualified dividend income” to REIT shareholders. These qualified dividends are eligible for preferential tax rates if paid to our non-corporate shareholders.

To the extent we make distributions to our taxable domestic shareholders in excess of our earnings and profits, such distributions will be considered a return of capital. Such distributions will be treated as a tax-free distribution and will reduce the tax basis of a shareholder's common shares by the amount of the distribution so treated. To the extent such distributions cumulatively exceed a taxable domestic shareholder's tax basis, such distributions are taxable as gain from the sale of shares. Shareholders may not include in their individual income tax returns any of our net operating losses or capital losses.

Dividends declared by a REIT in October, November, or December are deemed to have been paid by the REIT and received by its shareholders on December 31 of that year, so long as the dividends are actually paid during January of the following year. However, this treatment only applies to the extent of the REIT's earnings and profits existing on December 31. To the extent the shareholder distribution paid in January exceeds available earnings and profits as of December 31, the excess will be treated as a distribution taxable to shareholders in the year paid. As such, for tax reporting purposes, January distributions paid to our shareholders may be split between two tax years.

A REIT may make an election under the Internal Revenue Code to treat certain dividends that are paid in a taxable year, as being made by the REIT in the previous taxable year. A shareholder is required to include the amount of the dividend in the taxable year that it is paid by the REIT.

Distributions made by us that we properly designate as capital gain dividends will be taxable to taxable domestic shareholders as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than one year. This treatment applies only to the extent that the designated distributions do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year or the amount of distributions treated as dividends for the taxable year. It applies regardless of the period for which a domestic shareholder has held his or her common shares. Despite this general rule, corporate shareholders may be required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain dividends as ordinary income.
Generally, our designated capital gain dividends will be broken out into net capital gains distributions (which are taxable to taxable domestic shareholders that are individuals, estates or trusts at a maximum rate of 20% for individual taxpayers in the highest tax bracket) and unrecaptured Section 1250 gain distributions (which are taxable to taxable domestic shareholders that are individuals, estates or trusts at a maximum rate of 25%).

Certain U.S. shareholders that are taxed as individuals, estates or trusts may also be required to pay an additional 3.8% tax on, among other things, dividends on and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of shares.

If, for any taxable year, we elect to designate as capital gain dividends any portion of the dividends paid or made available for the year to holders of all classes of shares of beneficial interest, then the portion of the capital gains dividends that will be allocable to the holders of common shares will be the total capital gain dividends multiplied by a fraction. The numerator of the fraction will be the total dividends paid or made available to the holders of the common shares for the year. The denominator of the fraction will be the total dividends paid or made available to holders of all classes of shares of beneficial interest.

We may elect to retain (rather than distribute as is generally required) net capital gain for a taxable year and pay the income tax on that gain. If we make this election, shareholders must include in income, as long-term capital gain, their proportionate share of the undistributed net capital gain. Shareholders will be treated as having paid their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on these gains. Accordingly, they will receive a tax credit or refund for the amount. Shareholders will increase the basis in their common shares by the difference between the amount of capital gain included in their income and the amount of the tax they are treated as having paid. Our earnings and profits will be adjusted appropriately.


27



In general, a shareholder will recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes on the sale or other disposition of common shares in an amount equal to the difference between:

(a)the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received in the sale or other disposition; and
(b)the shareholder's adjusted tax basis in the common shares.
The gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the common shares were held as a capital asset. Generally, the capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the common shares were held for more than one year.

In general, a loss recognized by a shareholder upon the sale of common shares that were held for six months or less, determined after applying certain holding period rules, will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent that the shareholder received distributions that were treated as long-term capital gains. For shareholders who are individuals, trusts and estates, the long-term capital loss will be apportioned among the applicable long-term capital gain rates to the extent that distributions received by the shareholder were previously so treated.

Taxation of domestic tax-exempt shareholders

Most tax-exempt organizations are not subject to federal income tax except to the extent of their unrelated business taxable income, which is often referred to as UBTI. Unless a tax-exempt shareholder holds its common shares as debt financed property or uses the common shares in an unrelated trade or business, distributions to the shareholder should not constitute UBTI. Similarly, if a tax-exempt shareholder sells common shares, the income from the sale should not constitute UBTI unless the shareholder held the shares as debt financed property or used the shares in a trade or business.

However, for tax-exempt shareholders that are social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts, and qualified group legal services plans, income from owning or selling common shares will constitute UBTI unless the organization is able to properly deduct amounts set aside or placed in reserve so as to offset the income generated by its investment in common shares. These shareholders should consult their own tax advisors concerning these set aside and reserve requirements which are set forth in the Internal Revenue Code.

In addition, certain pension trusts that own more than 10% of a “pension-held REIT” must report a portion of the distributions that they receive from the REIT as UBTI. We have not been and do not expect to be treated as a pension-held REIT for purposes of this rule.
Taxation of foreign shareholders

The following is a discussion of certain anticipated United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of common shares applicable to a foreign shareholder. For purposes of this discussion, a “foreign shareholder” is any person other than:

(a)a citizen or resident of the United States;
(b)a corporation or partnership created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States or of any state thereof; or
(c)an estate or trust whose income is includable in gross income for United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its source.

Distributions by Us. Distributions by us to a foreign shareholder that are neither attributable to gain from sales or exchanges by us of United States real property interests nor designated by us as capital gains dividends will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to the extent that they are made out of our earnings and profits. These distributions ordinarily will be subject to withholding of United States federal income tax on a gross basis at a 30% rate, or a lower treaty rate, unless the dividends are treated as effectively connected with the conduct by the foreign shareholder of a United States trade or business. Please note that under certain treaties lower withholding rates generally applicable to dividends do not apply to dividends from REITs. Dividends that are effectively connected with a United States trade or business will be subject to tax on a net basis at graduated rates, and are generally not subject to withholding. Certification and disclosure requirements must be satisfied before a dividend is exempt from withholding under this exemption. A foreign shareholder that is a corporation also may be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or a lower treaty rate.

We expect to withhold United States income tax at the rate of 30% on any such distributions made to a foreign shareholder unless:

28




(a)a lower treaty rate applies and any required form or certification evidencing eligibility for that reduced rate is filed with us; or
(b)the foreign shareholder files an IRS Form W-8ECI with us claiming that the distribution is effectively connected income.

If such distribution is in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, it will not be taxable to a foreign shareholder to the extent that the distribution does not exceed the adjusted basis of the shareholder's common shares. Instead, the distribution will reduce the adjusted basis of the common shares. To the extent that the distribution exceeds the adjusted basis of the common shares, it will give rise to gain from the sale or exchange of the shareholder's common shares. The tax treatment of this gain is described below.

We intend to withhold at a rate of 30%, or a lower applicable treaty rate, on the entire amount of any distribution not designated as a capital gain distribution. In such event, a foreign shareholder may seek a refund of the withheld amount from the IRS if it is subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of our earnings and profits, and the amount withheld exceeded the foreign shareholder's United States tax liability with respect to the distribution.
Distributions to a foreign shareholder that we designate at the time of the distributions as capital gain dividends, other than those arising from the disposition of a United States real property interest, generally will not be subject to United States federal income taxation unless:

(a)the investment in the common shares is effectively connected with the foreign shareholder's United States trade or business, in which case the foreign shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as domestic shareholders, except that a shareholder that is a foreign corporation may also be subject to the branch profits tax, as discussed above; or
(b)the foreign shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States, in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual's capital gains.

Under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, which is known as FIRPTA, distributions to a foreign shareholder (other than certain qualified shareholders and qualified foreign pension funds discussed below) that are attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of United States real property interests will cause the foreign shareholder to be treated as recognizing the gain as income effectively connected with a United States trade or business. This rule applies whether or not a distribution is designated as a capital gain dividend. Accordingly, foreign shareholders generally would be taxed on these distributions at the same rates applicable to U.S. shareholders, subject to a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. In addition, a foreign corporate shareholder might be subject to the branch profits tax discussed above, as well as U.S. federal income tax return filing requirements. We are required to withhold 35% of these distributions. The withheld amount can be credited against the foreign shareholder's United States federal income tax liability.

Although the law is not entirely clear on the matter, it appears that amounts we designate as undistributed capital gains in respect of the common shares held by U.S. shareholders would be treated with respect to foreign shareholders in the same manner as actual distributions of capital gain dividends. Under that approach, foreign shareholders would be able to offset as a credit against their United States federal income tax liability their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on these undistributed capital gains. In addition, if timely requested, foreign shareholders might be able to receive from the IRS a refund to the extent their proportionate share of the tax paid by us were to exceed their actual United States federal income tax liability.

Foreign Shareholders' Sales of Common Shares. Gain recognized by a foreign shareholder upon the sale or exchange of common shares generally will not be subject to United States taxation unless the shares constitute a “United States real property interest” within the meaning of FIRPTA. The common shares will not constitute a United States real property interest so long as we are a domestically controlled REIT. A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which at all times during a specified testing period less than 50% in value of its stock is held directly or indirectly by foreign shareholders. We believe that we are a domestically controlled REIT. Therefore, we believe that the sale of common shares will not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. However, because common shares and preferred shares are publicly traded, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to be a domestically controlled REIT. In any event, gain from the sale or exchange of common shares not otherwise subject to FIRPTA will be subject to U.S. tax, if either:

(a)the investment in the common shares is effectively connected with the foreign shareholder's United States trade or business, in which case the foreign shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as domestic shareholders with respect to the gain; or

29



(b)the foreign shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a tax home in the United States, in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual's capital gains.

Even if we do not qualify as or cease to be a domestically controlled REIT, gain arising from the sale or exchange by a foreign shareholder of common shares still would not be subject to United States taxation under FIRPTA as a sale of a United States real property interest if:

(a)the class or series of shares being sold is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable IRS regulations, on an established securities market such as the New York Stock Exchange; and
(b)the selling foreign shareholder owned 10% or less of the value of the outstanding class or series of shares being sold throughout the five-year period ending on the date of the sale or exchange.
If gain on the sale or exchange of common shares were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the foreign shareholder would be subject to regular United States income tax with respect to the gain in the same manner as a taxable U.S. shareholder, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax, a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals and the possible application of the branch profits tax in the case of foreign corporations. The purchaser of the common shares would be required to withhold and remit to the IRS 15% of the purchase price.

Exception to FIRPTA for Qualified Shareholders. For dispositions and distributions after December 18, 2015, stock of a REIT held (directly or through partnerships) by a “qualified shareholder” will not be treated as United States real property interest, and capital gain dividends from such a REIT will not be treated as gain from the sale of a United States real property interest. This exception does not apply to persons that hold an interest, taking into account applicable constructive ownership rules, more than 10% of the stock of the REIT (unless that interest is solely as a creditor (an “applicable investor”)). If the qualified shareholder has such an “applicable investor,” the portion of REIT stock indirectly owned through the qualified shareholder by the applicable investor will be treated as gains from the sale of United States real property interests. For these purposes, a “qualified shareholder” is a foreign person which is in a treaty jurisdiction and satisfies certain publicly traded requirements, is a “qualified collective investment vehicle” and maintains records on the identity of certain 5% owners. A “qualified collective investment vehicle” is a foreign person that is eligible for a reduced withholding rate with respect to ordinary REIT dividends even if such person holds more than 10% of the REIT’s stock, a publicly traded partnership that is a withholding foreign partnership that would be a United States real property holding corporation if it were a United States corporation, or is designated as a qualified collective investment vehicle by the Secretary of the Treasury and is either fiscally transparent within the meaning of the Code or required to include dividends in its gross income but entitled to a deduction for distribution to its investors. Finally, capital gain dividends and nondividend redemption and liquidating distributions to a qualified shareholder that are not allocable to an applicable investor will be treated as ordinary dividends.

Exception to FIRPTA Withholding for Qualified Foreign Pension Funds. For distributions or disposition of REIT stock after December 18, 2015, “qualified foreign pension funds” and entities that are wholly owned by a qualified foreign pension fund are exempted from FIRPTA withholding. For these purposes, a “qualified foreign pension fund” is any trust, corporation, or other organization or arrangement if (i) it was created or organized under foreign law, (ii) it was established to provide retirement or pension benefits to participants or beneficiaries that are current or former employees (or persons designated by such employees) of one or more employers in consideration for services rendered, (iii) it does not have a single participant or beneficiary with a right to more than 5% of its assets or income, (iv) it is subject to government regulation and provides annual information reporting about its beneficiaries to the relevant tax authorities in the country in which it is established or operates, and (v) under the laws of the country in which it is established or operates, either contributions to such fund which would otherwise be subject to tax under such laws are deductible or excluded from the gross income of such fund or taxed at a reduced rate, or taxation of any investment income of such fund is deferred or such income is taxed at a reduced rate.

Information reporting requirement and backup withholding

We will report to our domestic shareholders and the Internal Revenue Service the amount of distributions paid during each calendar year and the amount of tax withheld, if any. Under certain circumstances, domestic shareholders may be subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding will apply only if such domestic shareholder fails to furnish certain information to us or the Internal Revenue Service. Backup withholding will not apply with respect to payments made to certain exempt recipients, such as corporations and tax-exempt organizations. Domestic shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding their qualification for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining such an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding with respect to a payment to a domestic shareholder will be allowed as a credit against such person's United States federal income tax liability and may entitle such person to a refund,

30



provided that the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

Withholding on foreign financial institutions and non-U.S. shareholders

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) imposes a U.S. withholding tax at a 30% rate on dividends and on proceeds from the sale of our shares paid beginning January 1, 2019 to “foreign financial institutions” (as defined under FATCA) and certain other foreign entities if certain due diligence and disclosure requirements related to U.S. accounts with, or ownership of, such entities are not satisfied or an exemption does not apply. If FATCA withholding is imposed, non-U.S. beneficial owners that are otherwise eligible for an exemption from, or a reduction of, U.S. withholding tax with respect to such distributions and sale proceeds would be required to seek a refund from the Internal Revenue Service to obtain the benefit of such exemption or reduction. Any payment made by us that is subject to withholding under FATCA or otherwise will be net of the amount required to be withheld.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments


None.


Item 2. Properties


As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company, directly or indirectly through investments in title holding entities, owned all or a portion of 302309 properties located in 10 states and the District of Columbia consisting of 77,45879,962 apartment units.  See Note 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the Starwood Transaction and the significant dispositions which occurred during 2016. See also Item 1, Business, for additional information regarding the Comapany'sCompany’s properties and the markets/metro areas upon which we are focused.The Company’s properties are summarized by building type in the following table:

Type

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment Units

 

 

Average

Apartment Units

 

Garden

 

 

105

 

 

 

26,688

 

 

 

254

 

Mid/High-Rise

 

 

204

 

 

 

53,274

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

 

309

 

 

 

79,962

 

 

 

259

 

Type Properties Apartment Units 
Average
Apartment Units
Garden 110
 27,769
 252
Mid/High-Rise 192
 49,689
 259
  302
 77,458
 256

The Company’s properties are summarized by ownership type in the following table:

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment Units

 

Wholly Owned Properties

 

 

291

 

 

 

76,265

 

Master-Leased Property – Consolidated

 

 

1

 

 

 

162

 

Partially Owned Properties – Consolidated

 

 

17

 

 

 

3,535

 

 

 

 

309

 

 

 

79,962

 

  Properties Apartment Units
Wholly Owned Properties 280
 72,445
Master-Leased Properties – Consolidated 3
 853
Partially Owned Properties – Consolidated 17
 3,215
Partially Owned Properties – Unconsolidated 2
 945
  302
 77,458

17


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth certain information by market relating to the Company'sCompany’s properties at December 31, 2016:2019:

Portfolio Summary

 

Markets/Metro Areas

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

% of

Stabilized

Budgeted

NOI (A)

 

 

Average

Rental

Rate (B)

 

Los Angeles

 

 

72

 

 

 

16,603

 

 

 

18.7

%

 

$

2,634

 

Orange County

 

 

13

 

 

 

4,028

 

 

 

4.3

%

 

 

2,271

 

San Diego

 

 

12

 

 

 

3,385

 

 

 

3.8

%

 

 

2,437

 

Subtotal – Southern California

 

 

97

 

 

 

24,016

 

 

 

26.8

%

 

 

2,545

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco

 

 

51

 

 

 

13,606

 

 

 

20.6

%

 

 

3,320

 

Washington D.C.

 

 

48

 

 

 

15,248

 

 

 

16.2

%

 

 

2,466

 

New York

 

 

37

 

 

 

9,606

 

 

 

14.4

%

 

 

3,937

 

Seattle

 

 

45

 

 

 

9,296

 

 

 

10.7

%

 

 

2,459

 

Boston

 

 

25

 

 

 

6,430

 

 

 

9.9

%

 

 

3,179

 

Denver

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,624

 

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

2,053

 

Other Markets

 

 

1

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

%

 

 

1,323

 

Total

 

 

309

 

 

 

79,962

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

2,858

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


31



Portfolio Summary
         
Markets/Metro Areas Properties Apartment Units 
% of
Stabilized
NOI (A)
 
Average
Rental
Rate (B)
Los Angeles 70
 15,857
 18.3% $2,382
Orange County 12
 3,684
 3.9% 2,028
San Diego 13
 3,505
 3.9% 2,198
Subtotal – Southern California 95
 23,046
 26.1% 2,295
         
San Francisco 54
 12,959
 19.7% 3,064
New York 40
 10,632
 17.9% 3,751
Washington D.C. 47
 15,637
 17.6% 2,341
Boston 26
 7,007
 10.7% 2,819
Seattle 37
 7,096
 8.0% 2,161
Other Markets 1
 136
 % 1,146
Total 300
 76,513
 100.0% 2,674
         
Unconsolidated Properties 2
 945
 
 
         
Grand Total 302
 77,458
 100.0% $2,674

Note: Projects under development are not included in the Portfolio Summary until construction has been completed.

(A)

% of Stabilized Budgeted NOI - Represents budgeted 2020 NOI for stabilized properties and projected annual NOI at stabilization (defined as having achieved 90% occupancy for three consecutive months) for properties that are in lease-up.

(A) % of Stabilized NOI - Represents budgeted 2017 NOI for stabilized properties and projected annual NOI at stabilization (defined as having achieved 90% occupancy for three consecutive months) for properties that are in lease-up.
(B) Average Rental Rate - Total residential rental revenues divided by the weighted average occupied apartment units for the reporting period presented.

The Company’s properties had an average occupancy of approximately 94.6% (95.7%

(B)

Average Rental Rate - Total residential rental revenues reflected on a straight-line basis in accordance with GAAP divided by the weighted average occupied apartment units for the reporting period presented.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s same store basis) at December 31, 2016.occupancy was 96.1% and its total portfolio-wide occupancy, which includes completed development properties in various stages of lease-up, was 95.8%.  Certain of the Company’s properties are encumbered by mortgages and additional detail can be found on Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.  Resident leases are generally for twelve months in length and can require security deposits. The garden-style propertieslength.  Garden-style are generally defined as properties with two and/or three story buildings while the mid-rise/high-rise are defined as properties with greater than three story buildings.  These two property types typically provide residents with amenities, such as rooftop decks and swimming pools, exercise roomsfitness centers and community rooms. Certain of these properties offer additional amenities such as saunas, whirlpools, spas, sports courts and exercise rooms or other amenities.  In addition, many of our urban properties have parking garagegarages and/or retail components.


18


Table of Contents

The consolidated properties currently in various stages of development and lease-up at December 31, 20162019 are included in the following table:

Development and Lease-Up Projects as of December 31, 2019

 

(Amounts in thousands except for project and apartment unit amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Total

 

 

Total Book

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of

 

 

Budgeted

 

 

Book

 

 

Value Not

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated/Actual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apartment

 

 

Capital

 

 

Value

 

 

Placed in

 

 

Total

 

 

Percentage

 

 

Initial

 

Completion

 

Stabilization

 

Percentage

 

 

Percentage

 

Projects

 

Location

 

Units

 

 

Cost (1)

 

 

to Date

 

 

Service

 

 

Debt

 

 

Completed

 

 

Occupancy

 

Date

 

Date

 

Leased

 

 

Occupied

 

Projects Under Development - Wholly Owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alcott Apartments (fka West End Tower)

 

Boston, MA

 

 

470

 

 

$

409,749

 

 

$

139,310

 

 

$

139,310

 

 

$

 

 

 

32

%

 

Q2 2021

 

Q3 2021

 

Q1 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

4885 Edgemoor Lane (2)

 

Bethesda, MD

 

 

154

 

 

 

75,271

 

 

 

10,865

 

 

 

10,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

%

 

Q3 2021

 

Q3 2021

 

Q3 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projects Under Development Wholly

   Owned

 

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

485,020

 

 

 

150,175

 

 

 

150,175

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projects Under Development - Partially Owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aero Apartments (3)

 

Alameda, CA

 

 

200

 

 

 

117,794

 

 

 

31,455

 

 

 

31,455

 

 

 

7,050

 

 

 

11

%

 

Q4 2020

 

Q2 2021

 

Q2 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projects Under Development Partially

   Owned

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

117,794

 

 

 

31,455

 

 

 

31,455

 

 

 

7,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projects Under Development

 

 

 

 

824

 

 

 

602,814

 

 

 

181,630

 

 

 

181,630

 

 

 

7,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Completed Not Stabilized (4):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lofts at Kendall Square II (fka 249 Third Street)

 

Cambridge, MA

 

 

84

 

 

 

51,447

 

 

 

47,259

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q3 2019

 

Q3 2019

 

Q2 2020

 

 

81

%

 

 

79

%

Chloe on Madison (fka 1401 E. Madison)

 

Seattle, WA

 

 

137

 

 

 

65,341

 

 

 

62,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q3 2019

 

Q3 2019

 

Q2 2020

 

 

81

%

 

 

75

%

Projects Completed Not Stabilized

 

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

116,788

 

 

 

110,254

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Completed and Stabilized During the Quarter:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100K Apartments

 

Washington D.C.

 

 

222

 

 

 

85,273

 

 

 

85,262

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q3 2018

 

Q4 2018

 

Q4 2019

 

 

96

%

 

 

96

%

Projects Completed and Stabilized During

   the Quarter

 

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

85,273

 

 

 

85,262

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Development Projects

 

 

 

 

1,267

 

 

$

804,875

 

 

$

377,146

 

 

$

181,630

 

 

$

7,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land Held for Development

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

$

96,688

 

 

$

96,688

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Total Budgeted Capital Cost – Estimated remaining cost for projects under development and/or developed plus all capitalized costs incurred to date, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, capitalized real estate taxes and insurance, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, plus any estimates of costs remaining to be funded for all projects, all in accordance with GAAP.


(2)

4885 Edgemoor Lane – The land under this project is subject to a long-term ground lease. This project is adjacent to an existing apartment property owned by the Company.

32

(3)

Aero Apartments – This development project is owned 90% by the Company and 10% by a third party partner in a joint venture consolidated by the Company. Construction is being partially funded with a construction loan that is non-recourse to the Company. The joint venture partner has funded $4.6 million for its allocated share of the project equity and serves as the developer of the project.

Table of Contents

(4)

Properties included here are substantially complete.  However, they may still require additional exterior and interior work for all apartment units to be available for leasing.  Both of these properties are wholly owned by the Company.



Development and Lease-Up Projects as of December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands except for project and apartment unit amounts)
Projects Location No. of
Apartment
Units
 Total
Capital
Cost (1)
 Total
Book Value
to Date
 Total Book
Value Not
Placed in
Service
 Total
Debt
 Percentage
Completed
 Percentage
Leased
 Percentage
Occupied
 Estimated
Completion
Date
 Estimated
Stabilization
Date
                        
Projects Under Development:                      
The Alton (formerly Millikan) Irvine, CA 344
 $102,331
 $101,907
 $39,993
 $
 96% 23% 17% Q1 2017 Q1 2018
455 Eye Street Washington, DC 174
 73,157
 58,558
 58,558
 
 72% 
 
 Q3 2017 Q2 2018
855 Brannan (formerly 801 Brannan) San Francisco, CA 449
 304,035
 208,268
 208,268
 
 66% 
 
 Q3 2017 Q1 2019
Helios (formerly 2nd & Pine) Seattle, WA 398
 215,787
 180,505
 180,505
 
 81% 
 
 Q3 2017 Q2 2019
Cascade Seattle, WA 477
 176,378
 123,462
 123,462
 
 68% 
 
 Q3 2017 Q2 2019
100 K Street Washington, DC 222
 88,023
 26,382
 26,382
 
 9% 
 
 Q4 2018 Q4 2019
                        
Projects Under Development   2,064
 959,711
 699,082
 637,168
 
          
                       
Completed Not Stabilized (2):                      
Potrero 1010 San Francisco, CA 453
 224,474
 219,668
 
 
   97% 96% Completed Q1 2017
340 Fremont (formerly Rincon Hill) San Francisco, CA 348
 292,054
 286,996
 
 
   80% 73% Completed Q2 2017
One Henry Adams San Francisco, CA 241
 172,337
 162,647
 
 
   26% 22% Completed Q4 2017
Altitude (formerly Village at Howard Hughes) Los Angeles, CA 545
 193,231
 191,702
 
 
   54% 52% Completed Q1 2018
                        
Projects Completed Not Stabilized   1,587
 882,096
 861,013
 
 
          
                        
Completed and Stabilized During the Quarter:                      
Vista 99 (formerly Tasman) San Jose, CA 554
 204,223
 202,884
 
 
   94% 93% Completed Stabilized
                        
Projects Completed and Stabilized During the Quarter   554
 204,223
 202,884
 
 
          
                        
Total Development Projects   4,205
 $2,046,030
 $1,762,979
 $637,168
 $
          
                        
Land Held for Development   N/A N/A $118,816
 $118,816
 $
          
                        
  
Note: All development projects listed are wholly owned by the Company.
(1)Total Capital Cost - Estimated cost for projects under development and/or developed and all capitalized costs incurred to date plus any estimates of costs remaining to be funded for all projects, including land acquisition costs, construction costs, capitalized real estate taxes and insurance, capitalized interest and loan fees, permits, professional fees, allocated development overhead and other regulatory fees, all in accordance with GAAP.
(2)Properties included here are substantially complete. However, they may still require additional exterior and interior work for all apartment units to be available for leasing.

The Company was party to a housing discrimination lawsuit brought by a non-profit civil rights organization in April 2006 in

As of December 31, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.  The suit alleged that the Company designed and built many of its properties in violation of the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) and Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”).  The suit sought actual and punitive damages, injunctive relief (including modification of non-compliant properties), costs and attorneys’ fees.  On March 31, 2016, the Court found that certain features at seven of the Company’s properties did not satisfy the accessibility requirements of the FHA. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company settled the lawsuit for $3.1 million, net of insurance recoveries already received. The Company also agreed to undertake the remediation of certain inaccessible features at a limited number of properties.


The Company does not believe there is any other litigation pending or threatened against it that, individually or in the aggregate, may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures


Not applicable.


33

19



PART II


Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Common Share Market PricesShare/Unit Dividends/Distributions (Equity Residential and Dividends (Equity Residential)


ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the high, low and closing sales prices for and the distributions declared on the Company’s Common Shares which trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol EQR.

  Sales Price  
  High Low Closing Distributions
2016  
  
  
  
Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2016 $65.14
 $58.28
 $64.36
 $0.50375
Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2016 $71.53
 $62.39
 $64.33
 $3.50375
Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2016 $75.49
 $63.11
 $68.88
 $0.50375
First Quarter Ended March 31, 2016 $81.76
 $66.62
 $75.03
 $8.50375
         
2015  
  
  
  
Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2015 $82.39
 $74.38
 $81.59
 $0.55250
Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2015 $81.98
 $61.90
 $75.12
 $0.55250
Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2015 $79.23
 $69.94
 $70.17
 $0.55250
First Quarter Ended March 31, 2015 $82.53
 $72.06
 $77.86
 $0.55250

Note: In addition to the regular quarterly dividends, the Company paid special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016.

The number of record holders of Common Shares at February 17, 2017 was approximately 2,400. The number of outstanding Common Shares as of February 17, 2017 was 367,097,667.

Unit Dividends (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

There is no established public market for the Operating Partnership’s Units (OP Units and restricted units).

  At February 14, 2020, the number of record holders of Common Shares was approximately 2,030 and 371,978,449 Common Shares were outstanding.  At February 14, 2020, the number of record holders of Units in the Operating Partnership was approximately 485 and 385,928,364 Units were outstanding.

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the dividends/distributions declared on the Company’s Common Shares/Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s Units.

 

 

Dividends/Distributions

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Fourth Quarter Ended December 31,

 

$

0.5675

 

 

$

0.54

 

Third Quarter Ended September 30,

 

$

0.5675

 

 

$

0.54

 

Second Quarter Ended June 30,

 

$

0.5675

 

 

$

0.54

 

First Quarter Ended March 31,

 

$

0.5675

 

 

$

0.54

 

  Distributions
  2016 2015
Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, $0.50375
 $0.55250
Third Quarter Ended September 30, $3.50375
 $0.55250
Second Quarter Ended June 30, $0.50375
 $0.55250
First Quarter Ended March 31, $8.50375
 $0.55250

Note: In addition to the regular quarterly dividends, the Company paid special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016.

The number of record holders of Units in the Operating Partnership at February 17, 2017 was approximately 500. The number of outstanding Units as of February 17, 2017 was 380,926,413.

Unregistered Common Shares Issued in the Quarter Ended December 31, 20162019 (Equity Residential)


During the quarter ended December 31, 2016,2019, EQR issued 1,67019,540 Common Shares in exchange for 1,67019,540 OP Units held by various limited partners of ERPOP.  OP Units are generally exchangeable into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis or, at the option of ERPOP, the cash equivalent thereof, at any time one year after the date of issuance.  These shares were either registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2)4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, as these were transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.  In light of the manner of the sale and information obtained by EQR from the limited partners in


34


connection with these transactions, EQR believes it may rely on these exemptions.

Equity Compensation Plan Information


The following table provides information as of December 31, 20162019 with respect to the Company'sCompany’s Common Shares that may be issued under its existing equity compensation plans.

Plan Category

 

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

 

 

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding

options, warrants

and rights

 

 

Number of securities

remaining available

for future issuance

under equity

compensation plans

(excluding securities

in column (a))

 

 

 

(a) (1)

 

 

(b) (1)

 

 

(c) (2)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 

 

5,567,544

 

 

$

55.52

 

 

 

14,042,598

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

  
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
in column (a))
Plan Category   
  (a) (1) (b) (1) (c) (2)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders 6,023,101 $42.05 11,501,716
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders N/A N/A N/A

(1)

(1)

The amounts shown in columns (a) and (b) of the above table do not include 452,034306,706 outstanding Common Shares (all of which are restricted and subject to vesting requirements) that were granted under the Company'sCompany’s 2011 Share Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2011 Plan"“2011 Plan”), and 2019 Share Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2019 Plan”), and outstanding Common Shares that have been purchased by employees and trustees under the Company'sCompany’s ESPP.

(2)

(2)

Includes 8,595,55311,328,266 Common Shares that may be issued under the 20112019 Plan of which only 33% may be in the form of restricted shares/units, and 2,906,1632,714,332 Common Shares that may be sold to employees and trustees under the ESPP.


On June 27, 2019, the shareholders of EQR approved the Company's 2019 Plan and the Company has filed a Form S-8 registration statement to register 11,331,958 Common Shares under this plan. As of December 31, 2019, 11,328,266 shares were available for future issuance. In conjunction with the approval of the 2019 Plan, no further awards may be granted under the 2011 Plan. The 2019 Plan expires on June 27, 2029.

Any Common Shares issued pursuant to EQR'sEQR’s incentive equity compensation and employee share purchase plans will result in ERPOP issuing OP Units to EQR on a one-for-one basis, with ERPOP receiving the net cash proceeds of such issuances.


Item 6.Selected Financial Data

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following tables set forth selected financial and operating information on a historical basis for the Company and the Operating Partnership.  The following information should be read in conjunction with all of the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.  The historical operating and balance sheet data have been derived from the historical financial statements of the Company and the Operating Partnership.  Selected balance sheet amounts have also been restated in accordance with the new deferred financing cost guidance effective January 1, 2016 (see Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion). Certain capitalized terms as used herein are defined in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.  As a result of the adoption of new lease accounting guidance on January 1, 2019, prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting policies (see Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion).

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(Financial information in thousands except for per share and property data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

OPERATING DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues from continuing operations

 

$

2,701,075

 

 

$

2,578,434

 

 

$

2,471,406

 

 

$

2,425,800

 

 

$

2,744,965

 

Net gain (loss) on sales of real estate properties

 

$

447,637

 

 

$

256,810

 

 

$

157,057

 

 

$

4,044,055

 

 

$

335,134

 

Interest and other income

 

$

2,817

 

 

$

15,317

 

 

$

6,136

 

 

$

65,773

 

 

$

7,372

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

 

$

4,479,586

 

 

$

907,621

 

Discontinued operations, net

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

518

 

 

$

397

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

 

$

4,480,104

 

 

$

908,018

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

967,287

 

 

$

654,445

 

 

$

600,363

 

 

$

4,289,072

 

 

$

863,277

 

Earnings per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

    available to Common Shares

 

$

2.61

 

 

$

1.78

 

 

$

1.64

 

 

$

11.75

 

 

$

2.37

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

2.61

 

 

$

1.78

 

 

$

1.64

 

 

$

11.75

 

 

$

2.37

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

 

370,461

 

 

 

368,052

 

 

 

366,968

 

 

 

365,002

 

 

 

363,498

 

Earnings per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

    available to Common Shares

 

$

2.60

 

 

$

1.77

 

 

$

1.63

 

 

$

11.68

 

 

$

2.36

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

2.60

 

 

$

1.77

 

 

$

1.63

 

 

$

11.68

 

 

$

2.36

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

 

386,333

 

 

 

383,695

 

 

 

382,678

 

 

 

381,992

 

 

 

380,620

 

Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding

 

$

2.27

 

 

$

2.16

 

 

$

2.015

 

 

$

13.015

 

 

$

2.21

 

BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of period):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate, before accumulated depreciation

 

$

27,533,607

 

 

$

26,511,022

 

 

$

26,026,896

 

 

$

25,386,425

 

 

$

25,182,352

 

Real estate, after accumulated depreciation

 

$

20,256,821

 

 

$

19,814,741

 

 

$

19,986,518

 

 

$

20,026,036

 

 

$

20,276,946

 

Real estate held for sale

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,181,135

 

Total assets

 

$

21,172,769

 

 

$

20,394,209

 

 

$

20,570,599

 

 

$

20,704,148

 

 

$

23,110,196

 

Total debt

 

$

9,036,956

 

 

$

8,817,939

 

 

$

8,957,291

 

 

$

8,987,258

 

 

$

10,921,366

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests –

   Operating Partnership

 

$

463,400

 

 

$

379,106

 

 

$

366,955

 

 

$

442,092

 

 

$

566,783

 

Total shareholders' equity

 

$

10,315,506

 

 

$

10,173,204

 

 

$

10,242,464

 

 

$

10,229,078

 

 

$

10,470,368

 

Total Noncontrolling Interests

 

$

229,020

 

 

$

226,445

 

 

$

231,399

 

 

$

231,906

 

 

$

225,987

 

OTHER DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total properties (at end of period)

 

 

309

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

305

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

394

 

Total apartment units (at end of period)

 

 

79,962

 

 

 

79,482

 

 

 

78,611

 

 

 

77,458

 

 

 

109,652

 

Funds from operations available to Common

   Shares and Units – basic (1)

 

$

1,311,058

 

 

$

1,204,867

 

 

$

1,204,904

 

 

$

1,123,530

 

 

$

1,323,786

 

Normalized funds from operations available to

   Common Shares and Units – basic (1)

 

$

1,348,068

 

 

$

1,248,710

 

 

$

1,199,237

 

 

$

1,179,650

 

 

$

1,317,802

 

Cash flow provided by (used for):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

1,456,984

 

 

$

1,356,295

 

 

$

1,265,788

 

 

$

1,214,123

 

 

$

1,356,628

 

Investing activities

 

$

(771,824

)

 

$

(376,834

)

 

$

(594,296

)

 

$

5,903,942

 

 

$

(695,814

)

Financing activities

 

$

(684,474

)

 

$

(963,910

)

 

$

(789,818

)

 

$

(7,054,092

)

 

$

(666,167

)


35

21


Table of Contents

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(Financial information in thousands except for per Unit and property data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

OPERATING DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues from continuing operations

 

$

2,701,075

 

 

$

2,578,434

 

 

$

2,471,406

 

 

$

2,425,800

 

 

$

2,744,965

 

Net gain (loss) on sales of real estate properties

 

$

447,637

 

 

$

256,810

 

 

$

157,057

 

 

$

4,044,055

 

 

$

335,134

 

Interest and other income

 

$

2,817

 

 

$

15,317

 

 

$

6,136

 

 

$

65,773

 

 

$

7,372

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

 

$

4,479,586

 

 

$

907,621

 

Discontinued operations, net

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

518

 

 

$

397

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

 

$

4,480,104

 

 

$

908,018

 

Net income available to Units

 

$

1,003,321

 

 

$

679,384

 

 

$

622,967

 

 

$

4,460,583

 

 

$

897,518

 

Earnings per Unit – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

   available to Units

 

$

2.61

 

 

$

1.78

 

 

$

1.64

 

 

$

11.75

 

 

$

2.37

 

Net income available to Units

 

$

2.61

 

 

$

1.78

 

 

$

1.64

 

 

$

11.75

 

 

$

2.37

 

Weighted average Units outstanding

 

 

383,368

 

 

 

380,921

 

 

 

379,869

 

 

 

378,829

 

 

 

377,074

 

Earnings per Unit – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

   available to Units

 

$

2.60

 

 

$

1.77

 

 

$

1.63

 

 

$

11.68

 

 

$

2.36

 

Net income available to Units

 

$

2.60

 

 

$

1.77

 

 

$

1.63

 

 

$

11.68

 

 

$

2.36

 

Weighted average Units outstanding

 

 

386,333

 

 

 

383,695

 

 

 

382,678

 

 

 

381,992

 

 

 

380,620

 

Distributions declared per Unit outstanding

 

$

2.27

 

 

$

2.16

 

 

$

2.015

 

 

$

13.015

 

 

$

2.21

 

BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of period):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate, before accumulated depreciation

 

$

27,533,607

 

 

$

26,511,022

 

 

$

26,026,896

 

 

$

25,386,425

 

 

$

25,182,352

 

Real estate, after accumulated depreciation

 

$

20,256,821

 

 

$

19,814,741

 

 

$

19,986,518

 

 

$

20,026,036

 

 

$

20,276,946

 

Real estate held for sale

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,181,135

 

Total assets

 

$

21,172,769

 

 

$

20,394,209

 

 

$

20,570,599

 

 

$

20,704,148

 

 

$

23,110,196

 

Total debt

 

$

9,036,956

 

 

$

8,817,939

 

 

$

8,957,291

 

 

$

8,987,258

 

 

$

10,921,366

 

Redeemable Limited Partners

 

$

463,400

 

 

$

379,106

 

 

$

366,955

 

 

$

442,092

 

 

$

566,783

 

Total partners’ capital

 

$

10,543,343

 

 

$

10,401,942

 

 

$

10,469,155

 

 

$

10,450,375

 

 

$

10,691,747

 

Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

$

1,183

 

 

$

(2,293

)

 

$

4,708

 

 

$

10,609

 

 

$

4,608

 

OTHER DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total properties (at end of period)

 

 

309

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

305

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

394

 

Total apartment units (at end of period)

 

 

79,962

 

 

 

79,482

 

 

 

78,611

 

 

 

77,458

 

 

 

109,652

 

Funds from operations available to Units –

   basic (1)

 

$

1,311,058

 

 

$

1,204,867

 

 

$

1,204,904

 

 

$

1,123,530

 

 

$

1,323,786

 

Normalized funds from operations available to

   Units – basic (1)

 

$

1,348,068

 

 

$

1,248,710

 

 

$

1,199,237

 

 

$

1,179,650

 

 

$

1,317,802

 

Cash flow provided by (used for):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

1,456,984

 

 

$

1,356,295

 

 

$

1,265,788

 

 

$

1,214,123

 

 

$

1,356,628

 

Investing activities

 

$

(771,824

)

 

$

(376,834

)

 

$

(594,296

)

 

$

5,903,942

 

 

$

(695,814

)

Financing activities

 

$

(684,474

)

 

$

(963,910

)

 

$

(789,818

)

 

$

(7,054,092

)

 

$

(666,167

)


(1)

See Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for a reconciliation of net income to FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units and the definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures.


EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Financial information in thousands except for per share and property data)
           
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
OPERATING DATA:  
  
  
  
  
Total revenues from continuing operations $2,425,800
 $2,744,965
 $2,614,748
 $2,387,702
 $1,747,502
Interest and other income $65,773
 $7,372
 $4,462
 $5,283
 $151,060
Net gain on sales of real estate properties $4,044,055
 $335,134
 $212,685
 $
 $
Income (loss) from continuing operations $4,479,586
 $907,621
 $657,101
 $(168,174) $160,298
Discontinued operations, net $518
 $397
 $1,582
 $2,073,527
 $720,906
Net income $4,480,104
 $908,018
 $658,683
 $1,905,353
 $881,204
Net income available to Common Shares $4,289,072
 $863,277
 $627,163
 $1,826,468
 $826,212
Earnings per share – basic:  
  
  
    
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    available to Common Shares
 $11.75
 $2.37
 $1.73
 $(0.47) $0.45
Net income available to Common Shares $11.75
 $2.37
 $1.74
 $5.16
 $2.73
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding 365,002
 363,498
 361,181
 354,305
 302,701
Earnings per share – diluted:  
  
  
    
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    available to Common Shares
 $11.68
 $2.36
 $1.72
 $(0.47) $0.45
Net income available to Common Shares $11.68
 $2.36
 $1.73
 $5.16
 $2.70
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding 381,992
 380,620
 377,735
 354,305
 319,766
Distributions declared per Common Share
    outstanding
 $13.015
 $2.21
 $2.00
 $1.85
 $1.78
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of period):
  
  
  
    
Real estate, before accumulated depreciation $25,386,425
 $25,182,352
 $27,675,383
 $26,800,948
 $21,008,429
Real estate, after accumulated depreciation $20,026,036
 $20,276,946
 $22,242,578
 $21,993,239
 $16,096,208
Real estate held for sale $
 $2,181,135
 $
 $
 $
Total assets $20,704,148
 $23,110,196
 $22,902,160
 $22,789,040
 $17,161,709
Total debt $8,987,258
 $10,921,366
 $10,796,407
 $10,720,749
 $8,489,953
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests –
   Operating Partnership
 $442,092
 $566,783
 $500,733
 $363,144
 $398,372
Total shareholders’ equity $10,229,078
 $10,470,368
 $10,368,456
 $10,507,201
 $7,289,813
Total Noncontrolling Interests $231,906
 $225,987
 $339,320
 $337,995
 $237,294
OTHER DATA:  
  
  
    
Total properties (at end of period) 302
 394
 391
 390
 403
Total apartment units (at end of period) 77,458
 109,652
 109,225
 109,855
 115,370
Funds from operations available to Common
   Shares and Units – basic (1) (3) (4)
 $1,123,530
 $1,323,786
 $1,190,915
 $872,421
 $993,217
Normalized funds from operations available to
   Common Shares and Units – basic (2) (3) (4)
 $1,179,650
 $1,317,802
 $1,196,446
 $1,057,073
 $883,269
Cash flow provided by (used for):  
  
  
    
Operating activities $1,111,489
 $1,356,499
 $1,324,073
 $868,916
 $1,046,155
Investing activities $5,871,973
 $(678,471) $(644,666) $(6,977) $(261,155)
Financing activities $(6,948,531) $(675,832) $(692,861) $(1,420,995) $(556,331)

36

22


Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company and the Operating Partnership should be read in connection with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.  Due to the Company’s ability to control the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, the Operating Partnership and each such subsidiary entity has been consolidated with the Company for financial reporting purposes, except for any unconsolidated properties/entities.  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined are as defined elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-looking statements in this Item 7 as well as elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions made by management.  While the Company’s management believes the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such information is inherently subject to uncertainties and may involve certain risks, which could cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Many of these uncertainties and risks are difficult to predict and beyond management’s control.  Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, results or events.  The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or supplement these forward-looking statements.  Factors that might cause such differences are discussed in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly those under Item 1A, Risk Factors.

Forward-looking statements and related uncertainties are also included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.  The 2020 guidance assumptions disclosed throughout this Item 7 are based on current expectations and are forward-looking.

Overview

See Item 1, Business, for discussion regarding the Company’s overview.

Business Objectives and Operating and Investing Strategies

See Item 1, Business, for discussion regarding the Company’s business objectives and operating and investing strategies.

23


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

2019 and 2018 Transactions

In conjunction with our business objectives and operating strategy, the Company continued to invest in apartment properties located primarily in our urban and high-density suburban communities and sell apartment properties that we believe will have inferior long-term returns.  The following tables provide a rollforward of the transactions that occurred during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Portfolio Rollforward

($ in thousands)

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Purchase

Price

 

 

Acquisition

Cap Rate

 

12/31/2018

 

 

307

 

 

 

79,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

 

9

 

 

 

2,412

 

 

$

1,039,830

 

 

 

4.6

%

Rental Properties – Not Stabilized (1)

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,128

 

 

$

454,859

 

 

 

4.9

%

Land Parcels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

19,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales Price

 

 

Disposition

Yield

 

Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated:

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(2,361

)

 

$

(1,080,675

)

 

 

(4.6

)%

Land Parcels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2,100

)

 

 

 

 

Unconsolidated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties (2)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(945

)

 

$

(394,500

)

 

 

(4.7

)%

Completed Developments – Consolidated

 

 

2

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Configuration Changes

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/31/2019

 

 

309

 

 

 

79,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Financial information in thousands except for per Unit and property data)
           
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
OPERATING DATA:  
  
  
  
  
Total revenues from continuing operations $2,425,800
 $2,744,965
 $2,614,748
 $2,387,702
 $1,747,502
Interest and other income $65,773
 $7,372
 $4,462
 $5,283
 $151,060
Net gain on sales of real estate properties $4,044,055
 $335,134
 $212,685
 $
 $
Income (loss) from continuing operations $4,479,586
 $907,621
 $657,101
 $(168,174) $160,298
Discontinued operations, net $518
 $397
 $1,582
 $2,073,527
 $720,906
Net income $4,480,104
 $908,018
 $658,683
 $1,905,353
 $881,204
Net income available to Units $4,460,583
 $897,518
 $651,994
 $1,901,746
 $864,853
Earnings per Unit – basic:  
  
  
  
  
Income (loss) from continuing operations
   available to Units
 $11.75
 $2.37
 $1.73
 $(0.47) $0.45
Net income available to Units $11.75
 $2.37
 $1.74
 $5.16
 $2.73
Weighted average Units outstanding 378,829
 377,074
 374,899
 368,038
 316,554
Earnings per Unit – diluted:  
  
  
  
  
Income (loss) from continuing operations
   available to Units
 $11.68
 $2.36
 $1.72
 $(0.47) $0.45
Net income available to Units $11.68
 $2.36
 $1.73
 $5.16
 $2.70
Weighted average Units outstanding 381,992
 380,620
 377,735
 368,038
 319,766
Distributions declared per Unit outstanding $13.015
 $2.21
 $2.00
 $1.85
 $1.78
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of period):
  
  
  
  
  
Real estate, before accumulated depreciation $25,386,425
 $25,182,352
 $27,675,383
 $26,800,948
 $21,008,429
Real estate, after accumulated depreciation $20,026,036
 $20,276,946
 $22,242,578
 $21,993,239
 $16,096,208
Real estate held for sale $
 $2,181,135
 $
 $
 $
Total assets $20,704,148
 $23,110,196
 $22,902,160
 $22,789,040
 $17,161,709
Total debt $8,987,258
 $10,921,366
 $10,796,407
 $10,720,749
 $8,489,953
Redeemable Limited Partners $442,092
 $566,783
 $500,733
 $363,144
 $398,372
Total partners' capital $10,450,375
 $10,691,747
 $10,582,867
 $10,718,613
 $7,449,419
Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned
   Properties
 $10,609
 $4,608
 $124,909
 $126,583
 $77,688
OTHER DATA:  
  
  
  
  
Total properties (at end of period) 302
 394
 391
 390
 403
Total apartment units (at end of period) 77,458
 109,652
 109,225
 109,855
 115,370
Funds from operations available to Units –
   basic (1) (3) (4)
 $1,123,530
 $1,323,786
 $1,190,915
 $872,421
 $993,217
Normalized funds from operations available to
   Units – basic (2) (3) (4)
 $1,179,650
 $1,317,802
 $1,196,446
 $1,057,073
 $883,269
Cash flow provided by (used for):  
  
  
  
  
Operating activities $1,111,489
 $1,356,499
 $1,324,073
 $868,916
 $1,046,155
Investing activities $5,871,973
 $(678,471) $(644,666) $(6,977) $(261,155)
Financing activities $(6,948,531) $(675,832) $(692,861) $(1,420,995) $(556,331)

(1)

The Company acquired four properties during the year ended December 31, 2019, consisting of two properties in the Denver market and two properties in the Seattle market, all of which are in the final stages of completing lease-up and are expected to stabilize in the second year of ownership at the Acquisition Cap Rate listed above.

(2)

The Company owned a 20% interest in unconsolidated rental properties located in San Jose, CA and South Florida.  Sales price listed is the gross sales price.  The Company received net sales proceeds of approximately $78.3 million and recognized a GAAP gain on sale of approximately $69.5 million.

24


Table of Contents

The consolidated properties acquired were located in the New York, Seattle, Washington D.C., San Francisco, Los Angeles and Denver markets.  The consolidated properties disposed of were located in the New York, Washington D.C., San Francisco and Boston markets and the sales generated an Unlevered IRR of 7.8%.  The consolidated properties development completions were located in the Boston and Seattle markets.  Finally, the Company started construction on two consolidated projects, located in the San Francisco and Washington D.C. markets, consisting of 354 apartment units totaling approximately $193.1 million of expected development costs.

Portfolio Rollforward

($ in thousands)

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Purchase

Price

 

 

Acquisition

Cap Rate

 

12/31/2017

 

 

305

 

 

 

78,611

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

$

707,005

 

 

 

4.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales Price

 

 

Disposition

Yield

 

Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(1,292

)

 

$

(706,120

)

 

 

(4.1

)%

Land Parcels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2,700

)

 

 

 

 

Completed Developments – Consolidated

 

 

2

 

 

 

671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Configuration Changes

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/31/2018

 

 

307

 

 

 

79,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The consolidated properties acquired were located in the Seattle, New York, Denver and Boston markets.  The consolidated properties disposed of were located in the Seattle, Los Angeles and New York markets and the sales generated an Unlevered IRR of 8.7%.  The consolidated properties development completions were located in the San Francisco and Washington D.C. markets.  Finally, the Company started construction on one consolidated project, located in the Boston market, consisting of 469 apartment units totaling approximately $409.7 million of expected development costs.

See the Definitions section below for the definition of Acquisition Cap Rate, Development Yield, Disposition Yield and Unlevered IRR.  See also Note 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s real estate transactions.

The Company’s guidance assumes consolidated rental acquisitions of $1.25 billion and consolidated rental dispositions of $1.0 billion, and the Company expects that the Acquisition Cap Rate will be 0.25% lower than the Disposition Yield for the full year ending December 31, 2020.  We currently budget spending approximately $365.0 million on development costs during the year ending December 31, 2020 (inclusive of approximately $50.0 million of construction mortgage and joint venture partner obligations), primarily for properties currently under construction.  

Same Store Results

Properties that the Company owned and were stabilized (see definition below) for all of both 2019 and 2018 (the “2019 Same Store Properties”), which represented 71,830 apartment units, impacted the Company’s results of operations.  The 2019 Same Store Properties are discussed in the following paragraphs.

The Company’s primary financial measure for evaluating each of its apartment communities is net operating income (“NOI”).  NOI represents rental income less direct property operating expenses (including real estate taxes and insurance).  The Company believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of its operating performance because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the Company’s apartment properties.

25


Table of Contents

The following tables provide a rollforward of the apartment units included in Same Store Properties and a reconciliation of apartment units included in Same Store Properties to those included in Total Properties for the year ended December 31, 2019:

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment

Units

 

Same Store Properties at December 31, 2018

 

 

281

 

 

 

71,721

 

2017 acquisitions

 

 

2

 

 

 

437

 

2019 dispositions

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(2,361

)

Properties added back to same store (1)

 

 

2

 

 

 

356

 

Lease-up properties stabilized

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,652

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Same Store Properties at December 31, 2019

 

 

279

 

 

 

71,830

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment

Units

 

Same Store

 

 

279

 

 

 

71,830

 

Non-Same Store:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 acquisitions

 

 

13

 

 

 

3,540

 

2018 acquisitions

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,461

 

2017 acquisitions – not stabilized

 

 

2

 

 

 

510

 

Master-Leased properties (2)

 

 

1

 

 

 

162

 

Lease-up properties not yet stabilized (3)

 

 

8

 

 

 

2,458

 

Other

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Total Non-Same Store

 

 

30

 

 

 

8,132

 

Total Properties and Apartment Units

 

 

309

 

 

 

79,962

 

Note: Properties are considered “stabilized” when they have achieved 90% occupancy for three consecutive months.  Properties are included in same store when they are stabilized for all of the current and comparable periods presented.

(1)

Consists of two properties which were added back to the same store portfolio as discussed further below:

a.

Playa Pacifica in Hermosa Beach, California containing 285 apartment units was removed from the same store portfolio in the first quarter of 2015 due to a major renovation in which significant portions of the property were taken offline for extended time periods.  Playa Pacifica was added back to same store for the year ended December 31, 2019 as the property achieved greater than 90% occupancy for all of the current and comparable periods presented.

b.

Acton Courtyard in Berkeley, California containing 71 apartment units was removed from the same store portfolio in the third quarter of 2016 due to an affordable housing dispute which required significant portions of the property to be vacant for an extended re-leasing period.  Acton Courtyard was added back to same store for the year ended December 31, 2019 as the property achieved greater than 90% occupancy for all of the current and comparable periods presented.

(2)

Consists of one property containing 162 apartment units that is wholly owned by the Company where the entire project is master-leased to a third party corporate housing provider.

(3)

Consists of properties in various stages of lease-up and properties where lease-up has been completed but the properties were not stabilized for the comparable periods presented.  Also includes two former master-leased properties that were not stabilized for the comparable periods presented.

26


Table of Contents

The following table provides comparative same store results and statistics for the 2019 Same Store Properties:

2019 vs. 2018

Same Store Results/Statistics for 71,830 Same Store Apartment Units

$ in thousands (except for Average Rental Rate)

 

 

Results

 

 

Statistics

 

Description

 

Revenues

 

 

Expenses

 

 

NOI

 

 

Average

Rental

Rate (1)

 

 

Physical

Occupancy (2)

 

 

Turnover (3)

 

2019

 

$

2,453,259

 

 

$

734,553

 

 

$

1,718,706

 

 

$

2,843

 

 

 

96.4

%

 

 

49.5

%

2018

 

$

2,377,066

 

 

$

708,616

 

 

$

1,668,450

 

 

$

2,762

 

 

 

96.2

%

 

 

51.4

%

Change

 

$

76,193

 

 

$

25,937

 

 

$

50,256

 

 

$

81

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

(1.9

%)

Change

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

3.7

%

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

2.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Same store revenues for all leases are reflected on a straight line basis in accordance with GAAP for the current and comparable periods.

(1)

Average Rental Rate – Total residential rental revenues reflected on a straight-line basis in accordance with GAAP divided by the weighted average occupied apartment units for the reporting period presented.  

(2)

Physical Occupancy – The weighted average occupied apartment units for the reporting period divided by the average of total apartment units available for rent for the reporting period.

(3)

Turnover – Total residential move-outs (including inter-property and intra-property transfers) divided by total residential apartment units.

The following tables present reconciliations of operating income per the consolidated statements of operations to NOI, along with rental income, operating expenses and NOI per the consolidated statements of operations allocated between same store and non-same store results for the 2019 Same Store Properties (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Operating income

 

$

1,356,544

 

 

$

1,115,370

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fee and asset management revenue

 

 

(384

)

 

 

(753

)

Property management

 

 

95,344

 

 

 

92,485

 

General and administrative

 

 

52,757

 

 

 

53,813

 

Depreciation

 

 

831,083

 

 

 

785,725

 

Net (gain) loss on sales of real estate properties

 

 

(447,637

)

 

 

(256,810

)

Impairment

 

 

 

 

 

702

 

Total NOI

 

$

1,887,707

 

 

$

1,790,532

 

Rental income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same store

 

$

2,453,259

 

 

$

2,377,066

 

Non-same store/other

 

 

247,432

 

 

 

200,615

 

Total rental income

 

 

2,700,691

 

 

 

2,577,681

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same store

 

 

734,553

 

 

 

708,616

 

Non-same store/other

 

 

78,431

 

 

 

78,533

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

812,984

 

 

 

787,149

 

NOI:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same store

 

 

1,718,706

 

 

 

1,668,450

 

Non-same store/other

 

 

169,001

 

 

 

122,082

 

Total NOI

 

$

1,887,707

 

 

$

1,790,532

 

The Company anticipates the following same store results for the full year ending December 31, 2020, which assumptions are based on current expectations and are forward-looking:

2020 Same Store Assumptions

(1)

Physical Occupancy

96.4%

Revenue change

2.3% to 3.3%

Expense change

3.0% to 4.0%

NOI change

1.5% to 3.5%

27


Table of Contents

The following table provides the actual same store revenue growth during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018 and our expected full year same store revenue growth for 2020:

Markets/Metro Areas

Actual Full Year 2019

Same Store Revenue Growth

Projected Full Year 2020

Same Store Revenue Growth

Boston

4.0%

2.6% to 3.6%

New York

2.3%

2.1% to 3.1%

Washington D.C.

2.3%

2.1% to 3.1%

Seattle

3.4%

3.5% to 4.5%

San Francisco

3.7%

2.6% to 3.6%

Los Angeles

3.7%

1.8% to 2.8%

Orange County

3.8%

2.7% to 3.7%

San Diego

3.3%

2.3% to 3.3%

Overall

3.2%

2.3% to 3.3%

Same store revenues for the full year of 2019 were slightly lower than our most recent expectations but still performed at the high end of our expectations from the beginning of the year.  Revenue increased due to record low turnover, strong occupancy and favorable overall demand.  The Company’s primary focus in 2019 was on providing remarkable experiences for our residents which resulted in record levels of customer satisfaction and resident retention.  The Company’s primary goals for 2020 will be to continue the 2019 trends while accelerating the deployment of various operating initiatives such as smart home technology and other sales and service related innovation improvements.   We expect consistent demand that should help with the absorption of the continued elevated supply that we expect in many of our markets.

New rent control regulations enacted in both the New York and California markets during 2019 are expected to negatively impact our overall same store revenue results by approximately 20 basis points for 2020.   Of the approximately 9,600 apartment units located in our New York market, approximately 3,100 apartment units are "rent stabilized" (primarily as a result of the 421(a) real estate tax abatement program) and therefore more directly impacted by these new regulations.  Once the abatement expires, the apartment units can be brought to market rents and will no longer be subject to the rent control regulations.  We estimate that the new regulations will have a negative impact on renewal rates for some of these 3,100 apartment units and will impact our ability to charge certain fees at all of our New York City properties (approximately 6,600 apartment units).  California’s new rent control regulations, which became effective on January 1, 2020, among other things limits the ability to raise rents on renewals to the local California consumer price index + 5% on properties fifteen years or older.  It does not, however, impose such a cap upon vacancy of an apartment unit.  Of our approximately 37,600 apartment units located in California, approximately 24,400 are subject to these new regulations.

Boston performed better than expected with strong demand across the market.  Strong occupancy, new lease and renewal pricing increases drove our improved performance in 2019.   However, with competitive new supply pressures increasing in 2020, we anticipate consistent occupancy but less growth from renewals and new leases that will lead to lower anticipated overall same store revenue growth levels in 2020.

Strong occupancy and pricing power continued to improve in New York as 2019 progressed.  This market, however, experienced some seasonal softness near year-end, resulting in a concessionary environment that was greater than expected.  For 2020, while we continue to believe the new rent control regulations will have a modestly negative impact on our New York market results, we expect overall same store revenue growth to improve from 2019 as pricing power returns to the market given the anticipated almost complete lack of competitive new supply.  Additionally, we expect slightly higher occupancy and renewal rates, favorable market conditions and new lease growth in 2020.  

Washington D.C. continued to demonstrate strength in demand with strong occupancy, renewal rates achieved and new lease change despite elevated supply in 2019.  The economy, particularly in Northern Virginia, remains strong with gains in the professional and business services sector which are aiding in the absorption of new supply being delivered.  In 2020, we anticipate improved results mostly driven by stronger embedded growth starting the year and similar operating outcomes for occupancy, new lease change and achieved renewal increase.

The Seattle market performed better than expected due to stronger than anticipated demand despite elevated new supply.  Job growth continued to be very strong and we experienced the highest occupancy gains, renewal rates achieved and new lease pricing of any of our markets in 2019.  We expect to produce better same store revenue growth in 2020 with similar occupancy, slight improvement to achieved renewal rates and the majority of growth coming from gains in new leases as we look to capitalize on the current and near-term pricing power in the portfolio.

28


Table of Contents

San Francisco performed slightly below our most recent expectations due to lower occupancy and elevated supply, especially in the East Bay, impacting performance towards the end of 2019.  While these trends are consistent with normal seasonal declines, they were modestly more pronounced.  In 2020, we expect similar new supply levels with the concentration of competitive supply impacting the downtown and South Bay areas the most.  Expected revenue growth in 2020 is lower compared to 2019 due to the impact of this new supply and the new rent control regulations.  While we expect some softness when new supply is concentrated around us, this market has a critical mass of technology talent and growth drivers for strong long-term performance.

While the Los Angeles market continued to maintain steady occupancy and solid renewal rates, the market performed slightly below our expectations due to pricing power declines and negative new lease changes as new supply was delivered during the second half of 2019.  We expect Los Angeles to be our most challenged market in 2020 due to elevated new supply, implementation of the new rent control regulations and restrictions on short-term lease pricing.  Therefore, we expect slightly lower occupancy, modest gains in new lease change and a decline in renewal rate achieved growth.  

In Orange County, results continued to be strong and in line with our expectations primarily due to high occupancy levels and in-line renewal rate achieved and new lease change.  Our properties performed well against competitive new supply during 2019.  For 2020, we expect to deliver similar occupancy, slight gains in new lease change and a decline in renewal rate achieved growth due to the impact of the new rent control regulations, leading to expected 2020 results below 2019. With strong occupancy, we believe that we are well-positioned heading into a competitive environment.

In San Diego, occupancy was better than expected but renewal rate achieved and new lease pricing were both lower than anticipated, resulting in same store revenue slightly below our expectations.  Overall, military spending in this market remains strong but supply pressure limits our pricing power.  We expect to deliver strong but lower same store revenue growth in 2020 with similar occupancy, slight gains in new lease change and a decline in renewal rate achieved growth based on the impact of the new rent control regulations.  With strong occupancy, we believe that we are well-positioned heading into a competitive environment.

The following table provides comparative same store operating expenses for the 2019 Same Store Properties:

2019 vs. 2018

Same Store Operating Expenses for 71,830 Same Store Apartment Units

$ in thousands

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Actual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

Actual

 

 

Actual

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

Operating

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

Change (5)

 

 

Change

 

 

Expenses

 

Real estate taxes

 

$

315,033

 

 

$

301,969

 

 

$

13,064

 

 

 

4.3

%

 

 

42.9

%

On-site payroll (1)

 

 

157,120

 

 

 

155,901

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

0.8

%

 

 

21.4

%

Utilities (2)

 

 

98,015

 

 

 

94,949

 

 

 

3,066

 

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

13.4

%

Repairs and maintenance (3)

 

 

92,361

 

 

 

90,050

 

 

 

2,311

 

 

 

2.6

%

 

 

12.6

%

Insurance

 

 

20,869

 

 

 

18,973

 

 

 

1,896

 

 

 

10.0

%

 

 

2.8

%

Leasing and advertising

 

 

9,774

 

 

 

9,883

 

 

 

(109

)

 

 

(1.1

)%

 

 

1.3

%

Other on-site operating expenses (4)

 

 

41,381

 

 

 

36,891

 

 

 

4,490

 

 

 

12.2

%

 

 

5.6

%

Same store operating expenses

 

$

734,553

 

 

$

708,616

 

 

$

25,937

 

 

 

3.7

%

 

 

100.0

%

(1)

On-site payroll – Includes payroll and related expenses for on-site personnel including property managers, leasing consultants and maintenance staff.

(2)

Utilities – Represents gross expenses prior to any recoveries under the Resident Utility Billing System (“RUBS”).  Recoveries are reflected in rental income.

(3)

Repairs and maintenance – Includes general maintenance costs, apartment unit turnover costs including interior painting, routine landscaping, security, exterminating, fire protection, snow removal, elevator, roof and parking lot repairs and other miscellaneous building repair and maintenance costs.

(4)

Other on-site operating expenses – Includes ground lease costs and administrative costs such as office supplies, telephone and data charges and association and business licensing fees.

(5)

The changes are due primarily to:

Real estate taxes – Increase above expectations due primarily to fewer recoveries from appeals activity.

On-site payroll – Increase below expectations.  Payroll pressures continue but were offset by lower than expected employee benefit-related costs.

Utilities – Growth generally in line with expectations for the year.

29


Table of Contents

Insurance – Increase due to higher premiums on property insurance renewal as a result of challenging conditions in the insurance market.

Other on-site operating expenses – Increase primarily driven by higher ground lease costs due to a contractual revaluation at one property along with higher association fees.

Same store expenses increased 3.7% during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, which was towards the low end of our original expectations (3.5% to 4.5%) and slightly lower than our most recent guidance provided in October 2019 (3.8%).  

We anticipate same store expenses to increase between 3.0% to 4.0% for 2020 as compared to 2019 primarily due to the following items:

Real estate taxes are estimated to remain elevated with an increase between 3.75% and 4.75% primarily due to the 421-a tax abatement benefits continuing to burn-off in New York, a slight decline in forecasted year-over-year appeals activity and anticipated rate pressure in Seattle;

Payroll costs are estimated to increase approximately 2.25% to 3.25% primarily due to continued pressures from a tight labor market and anticipated increases in medical insurance and other employee benefits due to these costs being lower than expected in 2019.  Excluding these anticipated medical expense/benefit pressures, we would expect growth to be very modest;

Utilities are estimated to increase between 2.5% and 3.5% primarily due to continued modest commodity cost pressures along with increases in trash and sewer costs; and

Repairs and maintenance costs are estimated to increase between 2.5% and 3.5% primarily due to significant pressure from increases in minimum wages for contract labor and additional cost from our operating initiatives offset by forecasted better utilization of our internal workforce.

Same store NOI increased 3.0% for the full year 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, which was at the high end of our original expectations (1.5% to 3.0%) and slightly lower than our most recent guidance provided in October 2019 (3.1%).  The Company anticipates same store NOI growth for the full year 2020 of approximately 1.5% to 3.5% as a result of the same store revenue and expense expectations discussed above.  

See also Note 17 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s segment disclosures.

Non-Same Store/Other Results

Non-same store/other NOI results for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased approximately $46.9 million compared to the same period of 2018 and consist primarily of properties acquired in calendar years 2018 and 2019, operations from the Company’s development properties and operations prior to disposition from 2018 and 2019 sold properties.  This difference is due primarily to:

A positive impact of higher NOI from development and newly stabilized development properties in lease-up of $13.4 million;

A positive impact of higher NOI from properties mainly acquired in 2018 and 2019 of $53.2 million;

A positive impact of higher NOI from other non-same store properties (including one current and two former master leased properties) of $0.8 million; and

A negative impact of lost NOI from 2018 and 2019 dispositions of $31.7 million.

30


Table of Contents

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2019 to the year ended December 31, 2018.  

The following table presents a reconciliation of diluted earnings per share/unit for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

December 31

 

Diluted earnings per share/unit for full year 2018

 

$

1.77

 

Property NOI

 

 

0.25

 

Debt extinguishment costs

 

 

0.05

 

Depreciation expense

 

 

(0.09

)

Net gain/loss on property/unconsolidated sales

 

 

0.67

 

Other

 

 

(0.05

)

Diluted earnings per share/unit for full year 2019

 

$

2.60

 

The increase in consolidated NOI is primarily a result of the Company’s improved NOI from same store and lease-up properties along with NOI from the Company’s recent transaction activity.  The following table presents the changes in the components of consolidated NOI for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018:

Year Ended

December 31, 2019

Consolidated rental income

4.8

%

Consolidated operating expenses (1)

3.3

%

Consolidated NOI

5.4

%

(1)

Consolidated operating expenses are comprised of property and maintenance and real estate taxes and insurance.

Property management expenses include off-site expenses associated with the self-management of the Company’s properties as well as management fees paid to any third party management companies.  These expenses increased approximately $2.9 million or 3.1% during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018.  These increases are primarily attributable to increases in legal and professional fees, computer operations and education/conferences cost.  The Company anticipates that property management expenses will approximate $100.0 million to $102.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2020, inclusive of $1.5 million of additional expenses for various operating initiatives such as sales-focused improvements and service enhancements along with personnel costs to support these initiatives.

General and administrative expenses, which include corporate operating expenses, decreased approximately $1.1 million or 2.0% during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to decreases in payroll-related costs, partially offset by increases in office rent.  The Company anticipates that general and administrative expenses will approximate $50.0 million to $52.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2020.

Depreciation expense, which includes depreciation on non-real estate assets, increased approximately $45.4 million or 5.8% during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily as a result of additional depreciation expense on properties acquired in 2018 and 2019 and development properties placed in service during 2018 and 2019, offset by lower depreciation from properties sold in 2018 and 2019.

Net gain on sales of real estate properties increased approximately $190.8 million or 74.3% during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily as a result of a higher sales volume with the sale of eleven consolidated apartment properties in 2019 as compared to five consolidated apartment properties in 2018.

Interest and other income decreased approximately $12.5 million or 81.6% during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to a decline in insurance/litigation settlement proceeds received during 2019 as compared to 2018.  The Company anticipates that interest and other income will approximate $1.5 million to $2.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2020, excluding certain non-comparable insurance/litigation settlement proceeds.

Other expenses increased approximately $0.9 million or 5.3% during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to an increase in expenses related to litigation settlements, pursuit costs and various consulting costs related to a data analytics project, partially offset by a decrease in advocacy contributions in 2019 as compared to 2018.

Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, decreased approximately $22.9 million or 5.4% during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018.  The decrease is due primarily to $17.3 million in lower debt extinguishment costs in 2019 as compared to 2018.  The effective interest cost on all indebtedness, excluding debt extinguishment costs/prepayment

31


Table of Contents

penalties, for the year ended December 31, 2019 was 4.20% as compared to 4.32% in 2018.  The Company capitalized interest of approximately $6.9 million and $6.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  The Company anticipates that interest expense, excluding debt extinguishment costs/prepayment penalties, will approximate $340.0 million to $348.0 million and capitalized interest will approximate $12.0 million to $14.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2020.

Income and other tax benefit increased approximately $3.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to various alternative minimum tax credit refunds recognized in 2019 that did not occur in 2018.  The Company anticipates that income and other tax expense will approximate $0.7 million to $1.2 million for the year ending December 31, 2020.

Income from investments in unconsolidated entities increased approximately $69.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily as a result of a $69.5 million gain on the sale of two unconsolidated properties in 2019 that did not occur in 2018.

Net gain on sales of land parcels increased approximately $1.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018, primarily due to a higher gain on the sale of two land parcels in 2019 as compared to one land parcel sale in 2018.  

For comparison of the year ended December 31, 2018 to the year ended December 31, 2017, refer to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Short-Term Liquidity and Cash Proceeds

The Company generally expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements, including capital expenditures related to maintaining its existing properties and scheduled unsecured note and mortgage note repayments, through its working capital, net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility and commercial paper program.  Under normal operating conditions, the Company considers its cash provided by operating activities to be adequate to meet operating requirements and payments of distributions.

As of January 1, 2019, the Company had approximately $47.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and approximately $68.9 million of restricted deposits, and the available borrowing capacity on its revolving credit facility was $1.40 billion.  After the effect of the various transactions discussed in the following paragraphs and the net cash provided by operating activities, at December 31, 2019, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance was approximately $45.8 million, the restricted deposits balance was approximately $71.2 million and the available borrowing capacity on its revolving credit facility was $1.38 billion.  See Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the availability on the Company’s revolving credit facility.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company generated proceeds from various transactions, which included the following:

Disposed of eleven consolidated rental properties, two unconsolidated rental properties and two land parcels, receiving combined net proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion;

Obtained $295.8 million of mortgage loan proceeds;

Issued $600.0 million of ten-year 3.00% unsecured notes, receiving net proceeds of approximately $597.5 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses;

Issued $600.0 million of ten-year 2.50% unsecured notes, receiving net proceeds of approximately $597.0 million before underwriting fees and other expenses; and

Issued Common Shares related to share option exercises and ESPP purchases and received net proceeds of $80.9 million, which were contributed to the capital of the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis).

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the above proceeds along with net cash flow from operations and borrowings from the Company’s revolving line of credit and commercial paper program were primarily utilized to:

Acquire thirteen consolidated rental properties and four land parcels for approximately $1.5 billion in cash;

Invest $195.7 million primarily in development projects;

Repay $749.8 million of mortgage loans (inclusive of scheduled principal repayments) and incur prepayment penalties of approximately $3.4 million; and

Repay $1.1 billion of unsecured notes and incur prepayment penalties of approximately $10.3 million.

32


Table of Contents

Credit Facility and Commercial Paper Program

The Company has a $2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing November 1, 2024.  The Company has the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $750.0 million by adding lenders to the facility, obtaining the agreement of existing lenders to increase their commitments or incurring one or more term loans.  The interest rate on advances under the facility will generally be LIBOR plus a spread (currently 0.775%), or based on bids received from the lending group, and the Company pays a quarterly facility fee (currently 0.125%).  Both the spread and the facility fee are dependent on the Company’s senior unsecured credit rating.

The unsecured revolving credit agreement contains provisions that establish a process for entering into an amendment to replace LIBOR under certain circumstances, such as the anticipated phase-out of LIBOR by the end of 2021. At this time, it cannot be determined what interest rate(s) may succeed LIBOR, if any, and how any successor or alternative rates for LIBOR may affect borrowing costs or the availability of variable interest rate borrowings.

The Company has an unsecured commercial paper note program in the United States.  The Company may borrow up to a maximum of $1.0 billion under this program subject to market conditions.  The notes will be sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and will rank pari passu with all of the Company’s other unsecured senior indebtedness.

The Company limits its utilization of the revolving credit facility in order to maintain liquidity to support its $1.0 billion commercial paper program along with certain other obligations.  The following table presents the availability on the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility as of February 14, 2020 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

February 14, 2020

 

Unsecured revolving credit facility commitment

 

$

2,500,000

 

Commercial paper balance outstanding

 

 

(1,000,000

)

Unsecured revolving credit facility balance outstanding

 

 

(10,000

)

Other restricted amounts

 

 

(100,949

)

Unsecured revolving credit facility availability

 

$

1,389,051

 

Dividend Policy

The Company determines its dividends/distributions based on actual and projected financial conditions, the Company’s actual and projected liquidity and operating results, the Company’s projected cash needs for capital expenditures and other investment activities and such other factors as the Company’s Board of Trustees deems relevant.  The Company declared a dividend/distribution for each quarter in 2019 of $0.5675 per share/unit, an annualized increase of 5.1% over the amount paid in 2018.  This increase is supported by the Company’s strong growth in property operations and a significant reduction in its development activity resulting in a material increase in available cash flow.  The Company’s 2019 operating cash flow was sufficient to cover capital expenditures and regular dividends/distributions.  

The Company expects to declare a dividend/distribution of $0.6025 per share/unit for the first quarter of 2020, an annualized increase of 6.2% over the amount paid in 2019.  This increase is driven by the Company’s continued strong cash flow performance, solid balance sheet and modest payout ratio.  The Company believes that its expected 2020 operating cash flow will be sufficient to cover capital expenditures and regular dividends/distributions.  All future dividends/distributions remain subject to the discretion of the Company’s Board of Trustees.  

Total dividends/distributions paid in January 2020 amounted to $218.3 million (excluding distributions on Partially Owned Properties), which consisted of certain distributions declared during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2019.

Long-Term Financing and Capital Needs

The Company expects to meet its long-term liquidity requirements, such as lump sum unsecured note and mortgage debt maturities, property acquisitions and financing of development activities, through the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities, including additional OP Units, proceeds received from the disposition of certain properties and joint ventures and cash generated from operations after all distributions.  In addition, the Company has a significant number of unencumbered properties available to secure additional mortgage borrowings in the event that unsecured capital is unavailable or the cost of alternative sources of capital is too high.  The value of and cash flow from these unencumbered properties are in excess of the requirements the Company must maintain in order to comply with covenants under its unsecured notes and line of credit.  Of the $27.5 billion in investment in real estate on the Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2019, $23.9 billion or 86.9% was unencumbered.  However, there can be no assurances that these sources of capital will be available to the Company in the future on acceptable terms or otherwise.

33


Table of Contents

EQR issues public equity and guarantees certain debt of the Operating Partnership from time to time.  EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership.

The Company’s total debt summary and debt maturity schedules as of December 31, 2019 are as follows:

Debt Summary as of December 31, 2019

($ in thousands)

 

 

Amounts

 

 

% of Total

 

 

Weighted

Average

Rates

 

 

Weighted

Average

Maturities

(years)

 

Secured

 

$

1,941,610

 

 

 

21.5

%

 

 

3.84

%

 

 

6.5

 

Unsecured

 

 

7,095,346

 

 

 

78.5

%

 

 

4.07

%

 

 

9.2

 

Total

 

$

9,036,956

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

4.02

%

 

 

8.6

 

Fixed Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured – Conventional

 

$

1,574,699

 

 

 

17.4

%

 

 

4.28

%

 

 

4.3

 

Unsecured – Public

 

 

6,077,513

 

 

 

67.3

%

 

 

4.24

%

 

 

10.8

 

Fixed Rate Debt

 

 

7,652,212

 

 

 

84.7

%

 

 

4.25

%

 

 

9.5

 

Floating Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured – Conventional

 

 

7,050

 

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

3.28

%

 

 

2.5

 

Secured – Tax Exempt

 

 

359,861

 

 

 

4.0

%

 

 

1.94

%

 

 

16.0

 

Unsecured – Public

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.34

%

 

 

 

Unsecured – Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

3.12

%

 

 

4.8

 

Unsecured – Commercial Paper Program

 

 

997,833

 

 

 

11.0

%

 

 

2.42

%

 

 

 

Floating Rate Debt

 

 

1,384,744

 

 

 

15.3

%

 

 

2.49

%

 

 

4.3

 

Total

 

$

9,036,956

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

4.02

%

 

 

8.6

 

34


Table of Contents

Debt Maturity Schedule as of December 31, 2019

($ in thousands)

Year

 

Fixed

Rate

 

 

Floating

Rate

 

 

Total

 

 

% of Total

 

 

Weighted Average

Coupons on

Fixed Rate Debt

 

 

Weighted Average

Coupons on

Total Debt

 

2020

 

$

27,542

 

 

$

1,000,000

 

(1)

$

1,027,542

 

 

 

11.3

%

 

 

4.56

%

 

 

2.07

%

2021

 

 

926,404

 

 

 

 

 

 

926,404

 

 

 

10.1

%

 

 

4.64

%

 

 

4.64

%

2022

 

 

264,185

 

 

 

7,650

 

 

 

271,835

 

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

3.25

%

 

 

3.23

%

2023

 

 

1,325,588

 

 

 

3,500

 

 

 

1,329,088

 

 

 

14.5

%

 

 

3.74

%

 

 

3.73

%

2024

 

 

 

 

 

26,100

 

(2)

 

26,100

 

 

 

0.3

%

 

N/A

 

 

 

2.37

%

2025

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

8,200

 

 

 

458,200

 

 

 

5.0

%

 

 

3.38

%

 

 

3.34

%

2026

 

 

592,025

 

 

 

9,000

 

 

 

601,025

 

 

 

6.6

%

 

 

3.58

%

 

 

3.56

%

2027

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

9,800

 

 

 

409,800

 

 

 

4.5

%

 

 

3.25

%

 

 

3.21

%

2028

 

 

900,000

 

 

 

42,380

 

 

 

942,380

 

 

 

10.3

%

 

 

3.79

%

 

 

3.70

%

2029

 

 

888,120

 

 

 

11,500

 

 

 

899,620

 

 

 

9.9

%

 

 

3.30

%

 

 

3.28

%

2030+

 

 

1,950,850

 

 

 

288,135

 

 

 

2,238,985

 

 

 

24.5

%

 

 

3.81

%

 

 

3.53

%

Subtotal

 

 

7,724,714

 

 

 

1,406,265

 

 

 

9,130,979

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

3.75

%

 

 

3.47

%

Deferred Financing Costs and

   Unamortized (Discount)

 

 

(72,502

)

 

 

(21,521

)

 

 

(94,023

)

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

Total

 

$

7,652,212

 

 

$

1,384,744

 

 

$

9,036,956

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

3.75

%

 

 

3.47

%

(1)

Represents principal outstanding on the Company’s commercial paper program.

(2)

Includes $20.0 million in principal outstanding on the Company’s revolving credit facility.

See the Definitions section below for the definition of Weighted Average Coupons and Weighted Average Rates.  See also Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of debt at December 31, 2019.

The Company’s “Consolidated Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization Ratio” as of December 31, 2019 is presented in the following table.  The Company calculates the equity component of its market capitalization as the sum of (i) the total outstanding Common Shares and assumed conversion of all Units at the equivalent market value of the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange and (ii) the liquidation value of all perpetual preferred shares outstanding.

Equity Residential

Capital Structure as of December 31, 2019

(Amounts in thousands except for share/unit and per share amounts)

Secured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,941,610

 

 

 

21.5

%

 

 

 

 

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,095,346

 

 

 

78.5

%

 

 

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,036,956

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

22.4

%

Common Shares (includes Restricted Shares)

 

 

371,670,884

 

 

 

96.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Units (includes OP Units and Restricted Units)

 

 

13,731,315

 

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Shares and Units

 

 

385,402,199

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Share Price at December 31, 2019

 

$

80.92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,186,746

 

 

 

99.9

%

 

 

 

 

Perpetual Preferred Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,280

 

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

 

 

Total Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,224,026

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

77.6

%

Total Market Capitalization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

40,260,982

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

The Operating Partnership’s “Consolidated Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization Ratio” as of December 31, 2019 is presented in the following table.  The Operating Partnership calculates the equity component of its market capitalization as the sum of (i) the total outstanding Units at the equivalent market value of the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange and (ii) the liquidation value of all perpetual preference units outstanding.

35


Table of Contents

ERP Operating Limited Partnership

Capital Structure as of December 31, 2019

(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)

Secured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,941,610

 

 

 

21.5

%

 

 

 

 

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,095,346

 

 

 

78.5

%

 

 

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,036,956

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

22.4

%

Total Outstanding Units

 

 

385,402,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Share Price at December 31, 2019

 

$

80.92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,186,746

 

 

 

99.9

%

 

 

 

 

Perpetual Preference Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,280

 

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

 

 

Total Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,224,026

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

77.6

%

Total Market Capitalization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

40,260,982

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0

%

EQR and ERPOP currently have an active universal shelf registration statement for the issuance of equity and debt securities that automatically became effective upon filing with the SEC in June 2019 and expires in June 2022.  Per the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds of all equity offerings to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis) or preference units (on a one-for-one preferred share per preference unit basis).

The Company has an At-The-Market (“ATM”) share offering program which allows EQR to sell Common Shares from time to time into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions.  In June 2019, the Company extended the program maturity to June 2022.  In connection with the extension, the Company may now also sell Common Shares under forward sale agreements.  The use of a forward sale agreement would allow the Company to lock in a price on the sale of Common Shares at the time the agreement is executed, but defer receiving the proceeds from the sale until a later date.  EQR has the authority to issue 13.0 million shares but has not issued any shares under this program since September 2012.  EQR may, but shall have no obligation to, sell Common Shares through the ATM share offering program in amounts and at times to be determined by EQR.  Actual sales will depend on a variety of factors, including (among others) market conditions, the trading price of EQR’s Common Shares and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for EQR. Through February 14, 2020, EQR has cumulatively issued approximately 16.7 million Common Shares at an average price of $48.53 per share for total consideration of approximately $809.9 million.

The Company may repurchase up to 13.0 million Common Shares under its share repurchase program.  No open market repurchases have occurred since 2008, and no repurchases of any kind have occurred since February 2014.  EQR may, but shall have no obligation to, repurchase Common Shares through the share repurchase program in amounts and at times to be determined by EQR.  Actual repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including (among others) market conditions, the trading price of EQR’s Common Shares and other opportunities for the investment of available capital.  As of February 14, 2020, EQR has remaining authorization to repurchase up to 13.0 million of its shares.  

ERPOP’s long-term senior debt ratings and short-term commercial paper ratings as well as EQR’s long-term preferred equity ratings, which all have a stable outlook, as of February 14, 2020 are as follows:

Standard &

Poors

Moodys

Fitch

ERPOPs long-term senior debt rating

A-

A3

A

ERPOPs short-term commercial paper rating

A-2

P-2

F-1

EQRs long-term preferred equity rating

BBB

Baa1

BBB+

See Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the events, if any, which occurred subsequent to December 31, 2019.

Capitalization of Fixed Assets and Improvements to Real Estate

Our policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize expenditures that improve the value of the property or extend the useful life of the component asset of the property.  We track improvements to real estate in three major categories and several subcategories:

Replacements (inside the apartment unit).  These include:

flooring such as carpets, hardwood, vinyl or tile;

36


Table of Contents

appliances;

mechanical equipment such as individual furnace/air units, hot water heaters, smoke/carbon monoxide/water alarms, etc.;

furniture and fixtures such as kitchen/bath cabinets, light fixtures, ceiling fans, sinks, tubs, toilets, mirrors, countertops, etc.; and

blinds and window coverings.

All replacements are depreciated over a five to ten-year estimated useful life.  We expense as incurred all make-ready maintenance and turnover costs such as cleaning, interior painting of individual apartment units and the repair of any replacement item noted above.

Building improvements (outside the apartment unit).  These include:

roof replacement and major repairs;

paving or major resurfacing of parking lots, curbs and sidewalks;

amenities and common areas such as pools, exterior sports and playground equipment, lobbies, clubhouses, laundry rooms, alarm and security systems and offices;

major building mechanical equipment systems;

interior and exterior structural repair and exterior painting and siding;

major landscaping and grounds improvement; and

vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.

All building improvements are depreciated over a five to fifteen-year estimated useful life.  We capitalize building improvements and upgrades only if the item: (i) exceeds $2,500 (selected projects may be restricted by other thresholds); (ii) extends the useful life of the asset; and (iii) improves the value of the asset.

The third major category is renovations, which primarily consists of expenditures for kitchens and baths designed to reposition the apartment units/properties for higher rental levels in their respective markets.  All renovation expenditures are depreciated over a ten-year estimated useful life.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, our actual capital expenditures to real estate included the following (amounts in thousands except for apartment unit and per apartment unit amounts):

Capital Expenditures to Real Estate

For the Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

Same Store

Properties (4)

 

 

Non-Same Store

Properties/Other (5)

 

 

Total

 

 

Same Store Avg. Per

Apartment Unit

 

Total Apartment Units

 

 

71,830

 

 

 

8,132

 

 

 

79,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Improvements (1)

 

$

91,256

 

 

$

7,469

 

 

$

98,725

 

 

$

1,270

 

Renovation Expenditures (2)

 

 

37,466

 

 

 

2,607

 

 

 

40,073

 

 

 

522

 

Replacements (3)

 

 

37,063

 

 

 

2,562

 

 

 

39,625

 

 

 

516

 

Total Capital Expenditures to Real Estate

 

$

165,785

 

 

$

12,638

 

 

$

178,423

 

 

$

2,308

 

(1)

Building Improvements – Includes roof replacement, paving, building mechanical equipment systems, exterior siding and painting, major landscaping, furniture, fixtures and equipment for amenities and common areas, vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.  

(2)

Renovation Expenditures – Apartment unit renovation costs (primarily kitchens and baths) designed to reposition these units for higher rental levels in their respective markets.  Amounts for 2,415 same store apartment units approximated $15,515 per apartment unit renovated.  

(3)

Replacements – Includes appliances, mechanical equipment, fixtures and flooring (including hardwood and carpeting).

(4)

Same Store Properties – Primarily includes all properties acquired or completed that are stabilized prior to January 1, 2018, less properties subsequently sold.

(5)

Non-Same Store Properties/Other – Primarily includes all properties acquired during 2018 and 2019, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2018.  Also includes capital expenditures for properties sold.

37


Table of Contents

For the year ended December 31, 2018, our actual capital expenditures to real estate included the following (amounts in thousands except for apartment unit and per apartment unit amounts):

Capital Expenditures to Real Estate

For the Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

 

Same Stores

Properties (5)

 

 

Non-Same Store

Properties/Other (6)

 

 

Total

 

 

Same Store

Avg. Per

Apartment Unit

 

Total Apartment Units (1)

 

 

71,721

 

 

 

6,816

 

 

 

78,537

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building Improvements (2)

 

$

100,382

 

 

$

3,830

 

 

$

104,212

 

 

$

1,399

 

Renovation Expenditures (3)

 

 

39,431

 

 

 

1,922

 

 

 

41,353

 

 

 

550

 

Replacements (4)

 

 

41,746

 

 

 

1,190

 

 

 

42,936

 

 

 

582

 

Total Capital Expenditures to Real Estate

 

$

181,559

 

 

$

6,942

 

 

$

188,501

 

 

$

2,531

 

(1)

Total Apartment Units – Excludes 945 unconsolidated apartment units for which capital expenditures to real estate are self-funded and do not consolidate into the Company’s results.

(2)

Building Improvements – Includes roof replacement, paving, building mechanical equipment systems, exterior siding and painting, major landscaping, furniture, fixtures and equipment for amenities and common areas, vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.  

(3)

Renovation Expenditures – Apartment unit renovation costs (primarily kitchens and baths) designed to reposition these units for higher rental levels in their respective markets.  Amounts for 2,850 same store apartment units approximated $13,800 per apartment unit renovated.  

(4)

Replacements – Includes appliances, mechanical equipment, fixtures and flooring (including hardwood and carpeting).

(5)

Same Store Properties – Primarily includes all properties acquired or completed that are stabilized prior to January 1, 2017, less properties subsequently sold.

(6)

Non-Same Store Properties/Other – Primarily includes all properties acquired during 2017 and 2018, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2017.  Also includes capital expenditures for properties sold.

The Company estimates that during 2020 it will spend approximately $2,600 per same store apartment unit or $195.0 million of total capital expenditures to real estate for same store properties.  Included in these total expected expenditures are approximately $50.0 million for apartment unit renovation expenditures on approximately 2,500 same store apartment units at an average cost of approximately $20,000 per apartment unit renovated and approximately $10.0 million on smart home technology upgrades on approximately 10,000 same store apartment units at an average cost of approximately $1,000 per apartment unit.  The anticipated total capital expenditures to real estate for same store properties represent a higher absolute and per unit dollar amount and percentage of same store revenues as compared to 2019, primarily due to the higher expected renovation expenditures and smart home technology upgrades.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s total non-real estate capital additions, such as computer software, computer equipment, and furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements to the Company’s property management offices and its corporate offices, were approximately $5.0 million.  The Company expects to fund approximately $22.7 million in total non-real estate capital additions in 2020.  These anticipated fundings are significantly higher than 2019 and are primarily driven by corporate office renovations during 2020.  

Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes.  The Company may seek to manage these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments.  The Company may also use derivatives to manage commodity prices in the daily operations of the business.

The Company has a policy of only entering into derivative contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors.  When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivatives are designed to hedge, the Company has not sustained a material loss from these instruments nor does it anticipate any material adverse effect on its net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives it currently has in place.

See Note 10 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of derivative instruments at December 31, 2019.

38


Table of Contents

Definitions

The definition of certain terms described above or below are as follows:

Acquisition Cap Rate – NOI that the Company anticipates receiving in the next 12 months (or the year two or three stabilized NOI for properties that are in lease-up at acquisition) less an estimate of property management costs/management fees allocated to the project (generally ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% of revenues depending on the size and income streams of the asset) and less an estimate for in-the-unit replacement capital expenditures (generally ranging from $100-$450 per apartment unit depending on the age and condition of the asset) divided by the gross purchase price of the asset. The weighted average Acquisition Cap Rate for acquired properties is weighted based on the projected NOI streams and the relative purchase price for each respective property.

Development Yield – NOI that the Company anticipates receiving in the next 12 months following stabilization less an estimate of property management costs/management fees allocated to the project (generally ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% of revenues depending on the size and income streams of the asset) and less an estimate for in-the-unit replacement capital expenditures (generally ranging from $50-$150 per apartment unit depending on the type of asset) divided by the Total Budgeted Capital Cost of the asset. The weighted average Development Yield for development properties is weighted based on the projected NOI streams and the relative Total Budgeted Capital Cost for each respective property.

Disposition Yield – NOI that the Company anticipates giving up in the next 12 months less an estimate of property management costs/management fees allocated to the project (generally ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% of revenues depending on the size and income streams of the asset) and less an estimate for in-the-unit replacement capital expenditures (generally ranging from $100-$450 per apartment unit depending on the age and condition of the asset) divided by the gross sales price of the asset. The weighted average Disposition Yield for sold properties is weighted based on the projected NOI streams and the relative sales price for each respective property.

Unlevered Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) – The Unlevered IRR on sold properties is the compound annual rate of return calculated by the Company based on the timing and amount of: (i) the gross purchase price of the property plus any direct acquisition costs incurred by the Company; (ii) total revenues earned during the Company’s ownership period; (iii) total direct property operating expenses (including real estate taxes and insurance) incurred during the Company’s ownership period; (iv) capital expenditures incurred during the Company’s ownership period; and (v) the gross sales price of the property net of selling costs.

Weighted Average Coupons – Contractual interest rate for each debt instrument weighted by principal balances as of December 31, 2019. In case of debt for which fair value hedges are in place, the rate payable under the corresponding derivatives is used in lieu of the contractual interest rate.

Weighted Average Rates – Interest expense for each debt instrument for the year ended December 31, 2019 weighted by its average principal balance for the same period. Interest expense includes amortization of premiums, discounts and other comprehensive income on debt and related derivative instruments. In case of debt for which derivatives are in place, the income or expense recognized under the corresponding derivatives is included in the total interest expense for the period.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The Company has various unconsolidated interests in certain joint ventures.  The Company does not believe that these unconsolidated investments have a materially different impact on its liquidity, cash flows, capital resources, credit or market risk than its consolidated operating and/or other activities.  See also Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s investments in partially owned entities.  See also Note 16 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion regarding the Company’s development projects.

39


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations for the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2019:

Payments Due by Year (in thousands)

 

Contractual Obligations

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Unamortized

Cost/Discounts

 

 

Total

 

Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal (1)

 

$

1,027,542

 

 

$

926,404

 

 

$

271,835

 

 

$

1,329,088

 

 

$

26,100

 

 

$

5,550,010

 

 

$

(94,023

)

 

$

9,036,956

 

Interest (2)

 

 

293,787

 

 

 

285,821

 

 

 

246,209

 

 

 

224,351

 

 

 

191,102

 

 

 

1,654,552

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,895,822

 

Finance Leases (3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Rent Payments

 

 

567

 

 

 

578

 

 

 

590

 

 

 

601

 

 

 

614

 

 

 

33,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,800

 

Operating Leases (3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Rent Payments

 

 

16,914

 

 

 

17,161

 

 

 

16,907

 

 

 

16,998

 

 

 

17,330

 

 

 

979,172

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,064,482

 

Other Long-Term Liabilities (3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Compensation

 

 

761

 

 

 

1,116

 

 

 

1,116

 

 

 

991

 

 

 

709

 

 

 

3,897

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,590

 

Total

 

$

1,339,571

 

 

$

1,231,080

 

 

$

536,657

 

 

$

1,572,029

 

 

$

235,855

 

 

$

8,221,481

 

 

$

(94,023

)

 

$

13,042,650

 

(1)

Amounts include aggregate principal payments only.

(2)

Amounts include interest expected to be incurred on the Company’s secured and unsecured debt based on obligations outstanding at December 31, 2019 and inclusive of capitalized interest.  For floating rate debt, the current rate in effect for the most recent payment through December 31, 2019 is assumed to be in effect through the respective maturity date of each instrument.

(3)

See Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s lease disclosures.  See Note 16 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion regarding the Company’s deferred compensation.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions.  If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different or different assumptions were made, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, resulting in different financial results or different presentation of our financial statements.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.  These policies were followed in preparing the consolidated financial statements at and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The Company has identified the significant accounting policies below as critical accounting policies.  These critical accounting policies are those that have the most impact on the reporting of our financial condition and those requiring significant judgments and estimates.  With respect to these critical accounting policies, management believes that the application of judgments and estimates is consistently applied and produces financial information that fairly presents the results of operations for all periods presented.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, including its investment in real estate, for indicators of impairment.  The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions, legal, regulatory and environmental concerns, the Company’s intent and ability to hold the related asset, as well as any significant cost overruns on development properties.  Future events could occur which would cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.  Assessing impairment can be complex and involves a high degree of subjectivity in determining if indicators are present and in estimating the future undiscounted cash flows or the fair value of an asset.  In particular, these estimates are sensitive to significant assumptions, including the estimation of future rental revenues, operating expenses, discount and capitalization rates and our intent and ability to hold the related asset, all of which could be affected by our expectations about future market or economic conditions.  These estimates can have a significant impact on the undiscounted cash flows or estimated fair value of an asset.

Acquisition of Investment Properties

The Company allocates the purchase price of properties that meet the definition of an asset acquisition to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on their relative fair values.  In making estimates of relative fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property, our own analysis of recently acquired and existing comparable properties in our portfolio and other market data.  The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the relative fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.

40


Table of Contents

Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations

The following is the Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s reconciliation of net income to FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units for each of the five years ended December 31, 2019:

Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

 

$

4,480,104

 

 

$

908,018

 

Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests –

   Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(3,297

)

 

 

(2,718

)

 

 

(2,323

)

 

 

(16,430

)

 

 

(3,657

)

Preferred/preference distributions

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,091

)

 

 

(3,091

)

 

 

(3,357

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares/Preference Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,486

)

Net income available to Common Shares and Units / Units

 

 

1,003,321

 

 

 

679,384

 

 

 

622,967

 

 

 

4,460,583

 

 

 

897,518

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

831,083

 

 

 

785,725

 

 

 

743,749

 

 

 

705,649

 

 

 

765,895

 

Depreciation – Non-real estate additions

 

 

(5,585

)

 

 

(4,561

)

 

 

(5,023

)

 

 

(5,224

)

 

 

(4,981

)

Depreciation – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(3,599

)

 

 

(3,740

)

 

 

(4,526

)

 

 

(3,805

)

 

 

(4,332

)

Depreciation – Unconsolidated Properties

 

 

2,997

 

 

 

4,451

 

 

 

4,577

 

 

 

4,745

 

 

 

4,920

 

Net (gain) loss on sales of unconsolidated entities – operating

   assets

 

 

(69,522

)

 

 

 

 

 

(73

)

 

 

(8,841

)

 

 

(100

)

Net (gain) loss on sales of real estate properties

 

 

(447,637

)

 

 

(256,810

)

 

 

(157,057

)

 

 

(4,044,055

)

 

 

(335,134

)

Noncontrolling Interests share of gain (loss) on sales of real

   estate properties

 

 

 

 

 

(284

)

 

 

290

 

 

 

14,521

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (gain) loss on sales of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(43

)

 

 

 

Impairment – operating assets

 

 

 

 

 

702

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (1) (3) (4)

 

 

1,311,058

 

 

 

1,204,867

 

 

 

1,204,904

 

 

 

1,123,530

 

 

 

1,323,786

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment – non-operating assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,693

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write-off of pursuit costs

 

 

5,529

 

 

 

4,450

 

 

 

3,106

 

 

 

4,092

 

 

 

3,208

 

Debt extinguishment and preferred share redemption (gains)

   losses

 

 

23,991

 

 

 

41,335

 

 

 

11,789

 

 

 

121,694

 

 

 

5,704

 

Non-operating asset (gains) losses

 

 

(940

)

 

 

(161

)

 

 

(18,884

)

 

 

(73,301

)

 

 

(18,805

)

Other miscellaneous items

 

 

8,430

 

 

 

(1,781

)

 

 

(3,371

)

 

 

3,635

 

 

 

3,909

 

Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units

   (2) (3) (4)

 

$

1,348,068

 

 

$

1,248,710

 

 

$

1,199,237

 

 

$

1,179,650

 

 

$

1,317,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFO (1) (3)

 

$

1,314,148

 

 

$

1,207,957

 

 

$

1,207,995

 

 

$

1,126,621

 

 

$

1,330,629

 

Preferred/preference distributions

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,091

)

 

 

(3,091

)

 

 

(3,357

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares/Preference Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,486

)

FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (1) (3) (4)

 

$

1,311,058

 

 

$

1,204,867

 

 

$

1,204,904

 

 

$

1,123,530

 

 

$

1,323,786

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normalized FFO (2) (3)

 

$

1,351,158

 

 

$

1,251,800

 

 

$

1,202,328

 

 

$

1,182,741

 

 

$

1,321,159

 

Preferred/preference distributions

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,091

)

 

 

(3,091

)

 

 

(3,357

)

Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units

   (2) (3) (4)

 

$

1,348,068

 

 

$

1,248,710

 

 

$

1,199,237

 

 

$

1,179,650

 

 

$

1,317,802

 

(1)

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”Nareit”) defines funds from operations (“FFO”) (April 2002(December 2018 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”)), excluding gains (or losses)or losses from sales and impairment write-downs of depreciable operating properties, plusreal estate and land when connected to the main business of a REIT, impairment write-downs of investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity and depreciation and amortization and after adjustmentsrelated to real estate.  Adjustments for unconsolidated partnershipspartially owned consolidated and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will beare calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. The April 2002 White Paper states that gain or loss on sales of property is excluded from FFO for previously depreciated operating properties only.


37

41




(2)

(2)

Normalized funds from operations (“Normalized FFO”) begins with FFO and excludes:

the impact of any expenses relating to non-operating asset impairment and valuation allowances;
property acquisition and other transaction costs related to mergers and acquisitions and pursuit cost write-offs;
gains and losses from early debt extinguishment, including prepayment penalties, preferred share/preference unit redemptions and the cost related to the implied option value of non-cash convertible debt discounts;
gains and losses on the sales of non-operating assets, including gains and losses from land parcel sales, net of the effect of income tax benefits or expenses; and
other miscellaneous items.

the impact of any expenses relating to non-operating asset impairment;

(3)

pursuit cost write-offs;

gains and losses from early debt extinguishment and preferred share redemptions;

gains and losses from non-operating assets; and

other miscellaneous items.

(3)

The Company believes that FFO and FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are helpful to investors as supplemental measures of the operating performance of a real estate company, because they are recognized measures of performance by the real estate industry and by excluding gains or losses from sales and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate and excluding depreciation related to dispositions of depreciable property and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO and FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units can help compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.  The Company also believes that Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are helpful to investors as supplemental measures of the operating performance of a real estate company because they allow investors to compare the Company’s operating performance to its performance in prior reporting periods and to the operating performance of other real estate companies without the effect of items that by their nature are not comparable from period to period and tend to obscure the Company’s actual operating results.  FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units do not represent net income, net income available to Common Shares / Units or net cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP.  Therefore, FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units should not be exclusively considered as alternatives to net income, net income available to Common Shares / Units or net cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP or as a measure of liquidity.  The Company’s calculation of FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units may differ from other real estate companies due to, among other items, variations in cost capitalization policies for capital expenditures and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other real estate companies.


(4)

(4)

FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are calculated on a basis consistent with net income available to Common Shares / Units and reflects adjustments to net income for preferred distributions and premiums on redemption of preferred shares/preference units in accordance with GAAP.  The equity positions of various individuals and entities that contributed their properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units are collectively referred to as the “Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership”.  Subject to certain restrictions, the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership may exchange their OP Units for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis.

Note: See

Item 7 for a reconciliation7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk from financial instruments primarily from changes in interest rates.  Such risks derive from the refinancing of net incomedebt maturities, from exposure to FFO, FFO availableinterest rate fluctuations on floating rate debt and from derivative instruments utilized to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO availableswap fixed rate debt to Common Shares and Units / Units.


Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company and the Operating Partnership should be readfloating or to hedge rates in connection with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. Due to the Company's ability to control the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, the Operating Partnership and each such subsidiary entity has been consolidated with the Company for financial reporting purposes, except for two unconsolidated operating properties. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined are as defined elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-looking statements in this Item 7 as well as elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions made by management. While the Company's management believes the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such information is inherently subject to uncertainties and may involve certain risks, which could cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Many of these uncertainties and risks are difficult to predict and beyond management's control. Forward-looking statements are not guaranteesanticipation of future performance,debt issuances.  Our operating results or events. The forward-looking statements contained herein are, made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or supplement these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to the following:

We intend to actively acquire, develop and rehab multifamily properties for rental operations as market conditions dictate. We may also acquire multifamily properties that are unoccupied or in the early stages of lease up. We may

38


be unable to lease up these apartment properties on schedule, resulting in decreases in expected rental revenues and/or lower yields due to lower occupancy and rental rates as well as higher than expected concessions or higher than expected operating expenses. We may not be able to achieve rents that are consistent with expectations for acquired, developed or rehabbed properties. We may underestimate the costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to standards established for its intended market position, to complete a development property or to complete a rehab. Additionally, we expect that other real estate investors with capital will compete with us for attractive investment opportunities or may also develop properties in markets where we focus our development and acquisition efforts. This competition (or lack thereof) may increase (or depress) prices for multifamily properties. We may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms. We have acquired in the past and intend to continue to pursue the acquisition of properties, including large portfolios of properties, that could increase our size and result in alterations to our capital structure. The total number of apartment units under development, costs of development and estimated completion dates are subject to uncertainties arising from changing economic conditions (such as the cost of labor and construction materials), competition and local government regulation;
Debt financing and other capital required by the Company may not be available or may only be available on adverse terms;
Labor and materials required for maintenance, repair, capital expenditure or development may be more expensive than anticipated;
Occupancy levels and market rents may be adverselytherefore, affected by national and local political, economic and market conditions including, without limitation, new construction and excess inventory of multifamily and owned housing/condominiums, increasing portions of owned housing/condominium stock being converted to rental use, rental housing subsidized by the government, other government programs that favor single family rental housing or owner occupied housing over multifamily rental housing, governmental regulations, slow or negative employment growth and household formation, the availability of low-interest mortgages or the availability of mortgages requiring little or no down payment for single family home buyers, changes in social preferencesshort-term interest rates, primarily London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) and the potential for geopolitical instability, all ofSecurities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”) indices, which are beyond the Company's control; and
Additional factors as discussed in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly thosedirectly impact borrowings under “Item 1A. Risk Factors”.

Forward-looking statements and related uncertainties are also included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Overview

Equity Residential (“EQR”), a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993, is an S&P 500 company focused on the acquisition, development and management of rental apartment properties in urban and high-density suburban coastal gateway markets where today's affluent renters want to live, work and play. ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”), an Illinois limited partnership, was formed in May 1993 to conduct the multifamily residential property business of Equity Residential. EQR has elected to be taxed as a REIT. References to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP. References to the “Operating Partnership” mean collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP.

EQR is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 2016 owned an approximate 96.2% ownership interest in, ERPOP. All of the Company’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and EQR has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP. EQR issues equity from time to time, the net proceeds of which it is obligated to contribute to ERPOP, but does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company’s ownership interests in its joint ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity.

The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois and the Company also operates property management offices in each of its six core coastal markets. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately 2,700 employees who provided real estate operations, leasing, legal, financial, accounting, acquisition, disposition, development and other support functions.




39


Business Objectives and Operating and Investing Strategies

The Company invests in apartment communities located in strategically targeted markets with the goal of maximizing our risk adjusted total return (operating income plus capital appreciation) on invested capital.
We seek to maximize the income and capital appreciation of our properties by investing in markets that are characterized by conditions favorable to multifamily property operations and appreciation. We are focused on the six coastal markets of Boston, New York, Washington D.C., Southern California (including Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego), San Francisco and Seattle. These markets generally feature one or more of the following characteristics that allow us to increase rents:

High home ownership costs;
Strong economic growth leading to job growth and household formation, which in turn leads to high demand for our apartments;
Urban core and high-density suburban locations with an attractive quality of life leading to high resident demand and retention;
Favorable demographics contributing to a larger pool of target residents with a high propensity to rent apartments; and
Higher barriers to entry where, because of land scarcity or government regulation, it is typically more difficult or costly to build new apartment properties, creating limits on new supply.
We believe our strategy also capitalizes on the increasing preference of renters of all ages to live in the urban core of cities or dense suburban locations near transit, entertainment and cultural amenities. Millennials, the 83 million people between ages 18 and 34, are a prime apartment rental demographic. Reports also show a growing trend among aging Baby Boomers, a demographic of more than 76 million people between the ages of 53 and 71, toward apartment rentals. We believe that both groups appreciate the locational values described above as well as the flexibility that rental apartments offer.
Our operating focus is on balancing occupancy and rental rates to maximize our revenue while exercising tight cost control to generate the highest possible return to our shareholders. Revenue is maximized by attracting qualified prospects to our properties, cost-effectively converting these prospects into new residents and keeping our residents satisfied so they will renew their leases upon expiration. While we believe that it is our high-quality, well-located assets that bring our customers to us, it is the customer service and superior value provided by our on-site personnel that keeps them renting with us and recommending us to their friends.

We use technology to engage our customers in the way that they want to be engaged. Many of our residents utilize our web-based resident portal which allows them to sign and renew their leases, review their accounts and make payments, provide feedback and make service requests on-line.

Acquisitions and developments may be financed from various sources of capital, which may include retained cash flow, issuance of additional equity and debt, sales of properties and joint venture agreements. In addition, the Company may acquire properties in transactions that include the issuance of partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) as consideration for the acquired properties. Such transactions may, in certain circumstances, enable the sellers to defer, in whole or in part, the recognition of taxable income or gain that might otherwise result from the sales. As part of its strategy, the Company purchases completed and fully occupied apartment properties, partially completed or partially occupied properties and may acquire land parcels to hold and/or sell based on market opportunities as well as options to buy more land in the future. The Company may also seek to acquire properties by purchasing defaulted or distressed debt that encumbers desirable properties in the hope of obtaining title to property through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure proceedings.

Over the past several years, the Company has done an extensive repositioning of its portfolio into urban and highly walkable, close-in suburban assets. Since 2005, the Company has sold nearly 198,000 apartment units primarily located in the less dense portion of suburban markets for an aggregate sales price of approximately $23.5 billion, acquired nearly 69,000 apartment units primarily located in urban and high-density suburban markets for approximately $20.0 billion and began approximately $5.7 billion of development projects primarily located in urban and high-density suburban markets. We are currently seeking to acquire and develop assets in the following six core coastal metropolitan areas: Boston, New York, Washington D.C., Southern California, San Francisco and Seattle. The sale of the Starwood Portfolio combined with the other 2016 dispositions has resulted in the Company's exit from the South Florida, Denver and New England (excluding Boston) markets and has substantially completed the Company's portfolio transformation which started approximately ten years ago. See further discussion below regarding the Company's 2016 disposition activity.


40


We endeavor to attract and retain the best employees by providing them with the education, resources and opportunities to succeed. We have a commitment to diversity in all of its forms and strive to promote and maintain a work environment where all employees are treated with dignity and respect, offered opportunities for professional development and valued for their unique contributions to the Company's success. We provide many classroom and on-line training courses to assist our employees in interacting with prospects and residents as well as extensively train our customer service specialists in maintaining our properties and improvements, equipment and appliances. We actively promote from within and many senior corporate and property leaders have risen from entry level or junior positions. We monitor our employees' engagement by surveying them annually and have consistently received high engagement scores.

We have a commitment to sustainability and consider the environmental impacts of our business activities. Sustainability and social responsibility are key drivers of our focus on creating the best apartment communities for residents to live, work and play. We have a dedicated in-house team that initiates and applies sustainable practices in all aspects of our business, including investment activities, development, property operations and property management activities. With its high density, multifamily housing is, by its nature, an environmentally friendly property type. Our recent acquisition and development activities have been primarily concentrated in pedestrian-friendly urban and close-in suburban locations near public transportation. When developing and renovating our properties, we strive to reduce energy and water usage by investing in energy saving technology while positively impacting the experience of our residents and the value of our assets. We continue to implement a combination of irrigation, lighting, HVAC and renewable energy improvements at our properties that will reduce energy and water consumption. The Company was named the 2016 Global Residential Listed Sector Leader in Sustainability by GRESB, a globally recognized analysis of the sustainability indicators of more than 750 real estate portfolios worldwide. The Company was also recently awarded the Residential Leader in the Light award for sustainability by NAREIT. For additional information regarding our sustainability efforts, see our December 2016 Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Report at our website, www.equityapartments.com. For 2017, we continue to have an express company-wide goal regarding enhanced sustainability efforts. Employees, including our executives, will have their performance against our various social responsibility goals evaluated as part of our annual performance review process.

Current Environment

Following the approval by the Company's Board of Trustees, the Company executed an agreement with controlled affiliates of Starwood Capital Group ("Starwood") on October 23, 2015 to sell a portfolio of 72 operating properties consisting of 23,262 apartment units located in five markets across the United States for $5.365 billion (the "Starwood Transaction" or "Starwood Portfolio"). On January 26 and 27, 2016, the Company closed on the sale of the entire portfolio described above. The sale of the Starwood Portfolio, combined with the other 2016 dispositions, has resulted in the Company's exit from the South Florida, Denver and New England (excluding Boston) markets and has substantially completed the Company's portfolio transformation which started approximately ten years ago. These sales have narrowed the Company's focus, which is now entirely directed towards our six coastal markets. We believe the assets sold will have lower long-term returns (as compared to investments in our six coastal markets) and that we sold them for prices that are favorable. Given the strong demand for multifamily assets in our six coastal markets from institutional investors and the challenge in recycling $6.8 billion of capital in this competitive marketplace, the Company believed the best risk-adjusted use of the sale proceeds was to distribute a portion to our shareholders and use the remainder to repay outstanding debt (see further discussion below).

The Company used the majority of the proceeds from the Starwood Transaction and other 2016 dispositions to pay two special dividends to its shareholders and holders of OP Units of $11.00 per share/unit in the aggregate. The Company paid special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016. The Company used the majority of the remaining proceeds to reduce aggregate indebtedness in order to make the transaction leverage neutral. The Company retired approximately $2.0 billion in secured and unsecured debt, the majority of which was scheduled to mature in 2016 and 2017, improving the Company's already strong credit metrics.

As a result of the Starwood Transaction and the other 2016 completed dispositions, the Company's portfolio has changed significantly from the portfolio summary included in the Company's 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table sets forth certain information by market relating to the Company's properties at December 31, 2016 as compared to December 31, 2015:


41


  Portfolio Summary as of December 31, 2015 Portfolio Summary as of December 31, 2016
                 
      % of Average     % of Average
    Apartment Stabilized Rental   Apartment Stabilized Rental
Markets/Metro Areas Properties Units NOI (A) Rate (B) Properties Units NOI (A) Rate (B)
                 
Los Angeles 70
 16,064
 14.5% $2,209
 70
 15,857
 18.3% $2,382
Orange County 12
 3,684
 3.1% 1,918
 12
 3,684
 3.9% 2,028
San Diego 13
 3,505
 3.1% 2,097
 13
 3,505
 3.9% 2,198
Subtotal – Southern California 95
 23,253
 20.7% 2,144
 95
 23,046
 26.1% 2,295
                 
San Francisco 52
 13,212
 14.9% 2,661
 54
 12,959
 19.7% 3,064
New York 40
 10,835
 17.3% 3,835
 40
 10,632
 17.9% 3,751
Washington D.C. 57
 18,656
 17.1% 2,182
 47
 15,637
 17.6% 2,341
Boston 35
 8,018
 9.6% 2,632
 26
 7,007
 10.7% 2,819
Seattle 44
 8,756
 7.6% 1,955
 37
 7,096
 8.0% 2,161
South Florida 34
 10,934
 7.2% 1,682
 
 
 
 
Denver 19
 6,935
 4.6% 1,556
 
 
 
 
Other Markets 13
 2,633
 1.0% 1,183
 1
 136
 % 1,146
Total 389
 103,232
 100.0% 2,306
 300
 76,513
 100.0% 2,674
                 
Unconsolidated Properties 3
 1,281
 
 
 2
 945
 
 
Military Housing 2
 5,139
 
 
 
 
 
 
                 
Grand Total 394
 109,652
 100.0% $2,306
 302
 77,458
 100.0% $2,764
                 
Note: Projects under development are not included in the Portfolio Summary until construction has been completed.
                 
(A) % of Stabilized NOI – For the December 31, 2016 Portfolio Summary, represents budgeted 2017 NOI for stabilized properties and projected annual NOI at stabilization (defined as having achieved 90% occupancy for three consecutive months) for properties that are in lease-up. For the December 31, 2015 Portfolio Summary, represents actual 2015 NOI for stabilized properties and projected annual NOI at stabilization (defined as having achieved 90% occupancy for three consecutive months) for properties that are in lease-up.
(B) Average Rental Rate – Total residential rental revenues divided by the weighted average occupied apartment units for the reporting period presented.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company acquired four consolidated rental properties consisting of 573 apartment units for $249.3 million. The Company acquired these properties primarily in order to protect the tax status of certain unaffiliated third parties arising from the Starwood Transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold 98 consolidated rental properties consisting of 29,440 apartment units for $6.8 billion, which includes the sale of the Starwood Portfolio described above. The Company also sold one unconsolidated rental property consisting of 336 apartment units for $74.5 million, with the Company's share of the net sales proceeds approximating $12.4 million. In addition, the Company sold three land parcels for $57.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company currently budgets consolidated rental acquisitions of approximately $500.0 million during the year ending December 31, 2017 to be funded with proceeds from rental dispositions. The Company currently budgets consolidated rental dispositions of approximately $500.0 million during the year ending December 31, 2017.
The Company has been reducing its development spending and starts in response to high land prices and low projected returns on investment. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company started construction on one project representing 222 apartment units totaling approximately $88.0 million of development costs and substantially completed construction on five projects representing 2,141 apartment units totaling approximately $1.1 billion of development costs. The Company currently budgets no development starts during the year ending December 31, 2017. We currently budget spending approximately $300.0 million on development costs during the year ending December 31, 2017, primarily for projects currently under construction. We currently anticipate having only $40.0 million remaining to spend during the year ending December 31, 2018 for projects currently under construction. We expect that this capital will be primarily sourced with excess operating cash flow, future debt offerings and borrowings on our revolving credit facility and/or commercial paper program.

We currently have access to multiple sources of capital including the equity markets as well as both the secured and unsecured debt markets. In February 2015, the Company entered into a $500.0 million commercial paper program, which allows for daily, weekly or monthly borrowings at low floating rates of interest. We believe this commercial paper program allows the

42


Company to continue to reduce its already low cost of capital and we generally use the program to replace a portion of the amount that otherwise would have been outstanding under our revolving line of credit (see further discussion below). In October 2016, the Company completed a $500.0 million unsecured ten year note offering with a coupon of 2.85% and an all-in effective interest rate of approximately 3.10%. The Company has budgeted $300.0 million to $500.0 million of secured or unsecured debt offerings during 2017, excluding usage of the commercial paper program.

On November 3, 2016, the Company replaced its existing $2.5 billion facility with a $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing January 10, 2022. The Company has the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $750.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase their commitments. The interest rate on advances under the facility will generally be LIBOR plus a spread (currently 0.825%), or based on bids received from the lending group, and the Company pays an annual facility fee (currently 12.5 basis points). Both the spread and the facility fee are dependent on the credit rating of the Company's long-term debt. We reduced the size of the facility to reflect the reduction in the size of the Company and the prepayment of a significant amount of debt during the first quarter of 2016. In the process, we were able to reduce the borrowing costs associated with this facility.

We believe that cash and cash equivalents, securities readily convertible to cash, excess operating cash flow, current availability on our revolving credit facility and interest on secured and unsecured borrowings contractually tied to such rates.  Short-term interest rates also indirectly affect the discount on notes issued under our commercial paper program, futureprogram.  Additionally, we have exposure to long-term interest rates, particularly U.S. Treasuries as they are utilized to price our long term borrowings and therefore affect the cost of refinancing existing debt offeringsor incurring additional debt.

The Company monitors and disposition proceeds for 2017 will provide sufficient liquiditymanages interest rates as part of its risk management process, by targeting adequate levels of floating rate exposure and an appropriate debt maturity profile.  From time to meet our funding obligations relatingtime, we may utilize derivative instruments to asset acquisitions, debt maturities and/or prepayments and existing development projects through 2017. We expect that our remaining longer-term funding requirements will be met through some combination of new borrowings, equity issuances, property dispositions, joint ventures and cash generated from operations.


Through their lender originator networks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the “Government Sponsored Enterprises” or “GSEs”) are significant lenders and enhancers of tax-exempt bonds both to the Companymanage interest rate exposure and to buyers of the Company's properties. The GSEs have a mandate to support multifamily housing through their financing activities. Any changes to their mandates, reductions in their size or the scale of their activities or loss of key personnel could have an impact on the Company and may, among other things, lead to lower values for our assets and higher interest rates on our secured borrowings. The Company has access to multiple other forms of public and private capital and over time, we would expect that other lenders, including banks, the commercial mortgage-backed securities market and life insurance companies, will become larger sources of secured debt capital to the multifamily market, particularly as it relates to the Company's high quality apartment properties.
Same store revenues increased 3.7% during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The full year 2016 results were below our original expectations due primarily to elevated levels of new luxury supply combined with slower job growth in the financial services and technology sectors in the New York and San Francisco markets, which made up approximately 38% of our NOI. We anticipate these trends continuing into 2017 and as a result currently estimate same store revenue increases ranging from 1.00% to 2.25% for 2017 as compared to 2016. Although occupancy rates remain strong across our portfolio, increased supply and slowing growth in higher paying jobs in many of our markets causes the Company to anticipate revenue growth in 2017 will be lower than 2016.

Washington D.C. continues to slowly and steadily improve, driven primarily by strong job growth. While the new administration issued a federal hiring freeze, we remain confident that demographics will continue to drive strong demand for apartments. Though new supply levels remain elevated, only about one-third of that supply is located in our submarkets. We expect continued slow improvement and expect to produce same store revenue growth of approximately 1.8% in this market in 2017.

In the New York market, elevated deliveries of new luxury supply in the Upper West Side and Brooklyn submarkets are having an impact on our ability to raise rents as renters trend towards affordability over neighborhood loyalty. There has also been a reduction in the rate of job growth in the financial services sector and technology sector, which are important demand drivers in the market. In order to remain competitive with this new supply, we offered rent concessions and increased leasing and advertising expenses throughout 2016 and will likely continue to do so during 2017. As a result, we expect there to be a decline in same store revenues of approximately 1.5% in 2017.

We have a cautious outlook for Boston as the market continues to feel the impact from an elevated level of deliveries of new supply in the downtown and Cambridge submarkets with approximately 75% of this new supply competing with our properties. Job growth has continued to improve in the market which is a positive sign that the additional supply may be absorbed without significant disruption. We expect to produce same store revenue growth of approximately 1.5% in this market in 2017.

Seattle is producing solid rental rate growth. Strong demand is being driven by the continued growth in technology jobs in the market. While new supply remains elevated in this market, the strong job growth has enabled that supply to be fully absorbed with little disruption. Therefore, we would expect Seattle to perform well through 2017, producing same store revenue growth of

43


approximately 4.25%.

San Francisco experienced significant volatility during peak leasing season as certain submarkets experienced elevated levels of new luxury supply combined with slower job growth in the technology sector. Currently, the market seems relatively stable, though with minimal pricing power on new leases. The market still features good demand as evidenced by how rapidly our newly completed development projects are leasing up. However, consumers have more choices as new supply continues to be delivered into most of our submarkets during 2017, limiting our pricing power. As a result, we expect to produce same store revenue growth of approximately 1.0% in this market in 2017.

Los Angeles is performing well and is positioned to be one of our better performing markets in 2017. Widely dispersed new supply, very good economic growth and a high level of job growth in the market are driving strong revenue growth. We expect to produce same store revenue growth of approximately 3.6% in this market in 2017. We expect our remaining markets in Southern California (Orange County and San Diego) to perform slightly better than Los Angeles.

Same store expenses increased 3.3% during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The full year 2016 results were slightly worse than our original expectations due to the following items:

Real estate taxes increased 5.9% for the full year 2016 primarily due to rate and value increases in certain states and municipalities, reflecting those states' and municipalities' continued economic challenges and the dramatic improvement in apartment values and fundamentals, the contractual annual reduction in the benefits of 421-a tax abatements in New York City and an adverse legal decision regarding the calculation of property taxes for certain properties in New Jersey; and
Payroll costs increased by 3.1% in 2016 over 2015 primarily due to an increase in on-site staffing to remain competitive within challenging markets, as well as higher on-site wages due to competition from new supply.

We anticipate same store expense increases ranging from 3.0% to 4.0% for 2017 as compared to 2016 due to the following items:

Real estate taxes are estimated to increase between 4.0% and 5.0% due primarily to increased values in most markets partially offset by declining rates. We expect 1.8 percentage points of the increase coming from 421-a tax abatement benefits expiring in New York;
Payroll costs are estimated to increase between 4.0% and 5.0% primarily due to an increase in on-site staffing to remain competitive within challenging markets, as well as higher on-site wages due to competition from new supply;
Utilities are estimated to increase approximately 2.0% primarily due to moderate increases in natural gas costs; and
Repair and maintenance expenses are estimated to be approximately $1.0 million higher due to increases in the minimum wage that impact our outside cleaning and landscaping vendors.

We anticipate same store NOI increases ranging from 0.0% to 2.0% for 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of the above same store revenue and expense expectations.

The Company expects total overhead costs (property management expense and general and administrative expense) to decline approximately $3.0 million in 2017 over 2016 as we have largely completed right sizing our overhead platform to our smaller asset size. As certain of the Company's overhead costs are fixed and/or not quickly scalable, the Company anticipates overhead costs as a percentage of total revenues will remain elevated as compared to 2015 levels, though slightly lower as compared to 2016 levels.

We believe that the Company is well-positioned in the long-term as a result of favorable demographics and increasing consumer preferences for the flexibility of rental housing. As of December 31, 2016, the Company's same store occupancy was 95.7% and its total portfolio-wide occupancy was 94.6%. We believe our markets/metro areas will continue to see increased luxury multifamily supply, especially in our urban core locations, and there will continue to be periods of disruption as new development projects lease up. We believe over the longer term that our markets will absorb future supply because of the strong long-term demand in these markets as exhibited by our current high occupancy levels and increasing household formations. We have seen evidence of this in Seattle as elevated levels of new supply have been absorbed and rental rates continue to grow. We also anticipate supply declining in our markets beginning in 2018,comply with the possible exception of New York, because of high construction costs, lower revenue growth and development lenders materially reducing their lending activities due to regulatory pressures and concerns over markets being overbuilt.

The current environment information presented above is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.

44



Results of Operations

In conjunction with our business objectives and operating strategy, the Company continued to invest in apartment properties located in our six coastal markets and sell apartment properties located primarily in the less dense portion of suburban markets during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. In summary, we:

Year Ended December 31, 2016:

Acquired four consolidated apartment properties consisting of 573 apartment units for $249.3 million at a weighted average Acquisition Cap Rate (see definition below) of 4.8%;
Sold 98 consolidated apartment properties consisting of 29,440 apartment units for $6.8 billion, which includes the sale of the Starwood Portfolio consisting of 72 consolidated rental properties containing 23,262 apartment units for $5.365 billion, at a weighted average Disposition Yield (see definition below) of 5.4% and generating an Unlevered IRR (see definition below) of 11.8%;
Sold one unconsolidated property consisting of 336 apartments units for $74.5 million (our share of the net sales proceeds approximated $12.4 million), generating a Disposition Yield of 5.6%;
Sold our entire interest in the management contracts and related rights associated with the military housing ventures at Joint Base Lewis McChord consisting of 5,161 apartment units for approximately $63.3 million and sold three land parcels for $57.5 million; and
Started the construction on one project consisting of 222 apartment units totaling approximately $88.0 million of development costs and substantially completed construction on five projects consisting of 2,141 apartment units totaling approximately $1.1 billion of development costs.

Year Ended December 31, 2015:

Acquired four consolidated apartment properties consisting of 625 apartment units for $296.0 million at a weighted average Acquisition Cap Rate of 4.5% and three contiguous land parcels for $27.8 million;
Sold eight consolidated apartment properties consisting of 1,857 apartments units as well as a 193,230 square foot medical office building for $513.3 million at a weighted average Disposition Yield of 5.3% and generating an Unlevered IRR of 13.4%; and
Started construction on two projects consisting of 623 apartment units totaling approximately $377.2 million of development costs and substantially completed construction on seven projects consisting of 1,546 apartments units totaling approximately $831.7 million of development costs.

The Company's primary financial measure for evaluating each of its apartment communities is net operating income (“NOI”). NOI represents rental income less direct property operating expenses (including real estate taxes and insurance). The Company believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of its operating performance because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the Company's apartment properties.
The definitionsrequirements of certain terms described above are as follows:

Acquisition Cap Rate – NOI that the Company anticipates receiving in the next 12 months (or the year twolenders, but not for trading or three stabilized NOI for properties that are in lease-up at acquisition) less an estimate of property management costs/management fees allocated to the project (generally ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% of revenues depending on the size and income streams of the asset) and less an estimate for in-the-unit replacement capital expenditures (generally ranging from $100-$450 per apartment unit depending on the age and condition of the asset) divided by the gross purchase price of the asset. The weighted average Acquisition Cap Rate for acquired properties is weighted based on the projected NOI streams and the relative purchase price for each respective property.
Disposition Yield – NOI that the Company anticipates giving up in the next 12 months less an estimate of property management costs/management fees allocated to the project (generally ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% of revenues depending on the size and income streams of the asset) and less an estimate for in-the-unit replacement capital expenditures (generally ranging from $100-$450 per apartment unit depending on the age and condition of the asset) divided by the gross sale price of the asset. The weighted average Disposition Yield for sold properties is weighted based on the projected NOI streams and the relative sales price for each respective property.
Unlevered Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) – The Unlevered IRR on sold properties refers to the internal rate of return calculated by the Company based on the timing and amount of (i) total revenue earned during the period owned by the

45


Company and (ii) the gross sales price net of selling costs, offset by (iii) the undepreciated capital cost of the properties at the time of sale and (iv) total direct property operating expenses (including real estate taxes and insurance) incurred during the period owned by the Company. Each of the items (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) is calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Properties that the Company owned and were stabilized (see definition below) for all of both 2016 and 2015 (the “2016 Same Store Properties”), which represented 69,879 apartment units, impacted the Company's results of operations. Properties that the Company owned for all of both 2015 and 2014 (the “2015 Same Store Properties”), which represented 96,286 apartment units, also impacted the Company's results of operations. Both the 2016 Same Store Properties and 2015 Same Store Properties are discussed in the following paragraphs.

The following tables provide a rollforward of the apartment units included in Same Store Properties and a reconciliation of apartment units included in Same Store Properties to those included in Total Properties for the year ended December 31, 2016:

  Year Ended
  December 31, 2016
  Properties 
Apartment
Units
Same Store Properties at December 31, 2015 358
 96,286
2014 acquisitions 4
 1,011
2016 dispositions (98) (29,440)
2016 dispositions not yet included in same store 2
 396
Lease-up properties stabilized 7
 1,690
Properties removed from same store (1) (1) (71)
Other 
 7
Same Store Properties at December 31, 2016 272
 69,879

  Year Ended
  December 31, 2016
  Properties 
Apartment
Units
Same Store 272
 69,879
     
Non-Same Store:    
2016 acquisitions 4
 573
2015 acquisitions 4
 625
Properties removed from same store (1) 2
 356
Master-Leased properties (2) 3
 853
   Lease-up properties not yet stabilized (3) 14
 4,226
   Other 1
 1
Total Non-Same Store 28
 6,634
Unconsolidated properties 2
 945
Total Properties and Apartment Units 302
 77,458
Note: Properties are considered "stabilized" when they have achieved 90% occupancy for three consecutive months. Properties are included in Same Store when they are stabilized for all of the current and comparable periods presented.
(1)Includes one property containing 285 apartment units (Playa Pacifica in Hermosa Beach, California) which was removed from the same store portfolio in 2015 due to a major renovation in which significant portions of the property were taken offline for extended time periods and one property containing 71 apartment units (Acton Courtyard in Berkeley, California) which was removed from the same store portfolio in 2016 due to an affordable housing dispute which required significant portions of the property to be vacant for an extended releasing period. As of December 31, 2016, Playa Pacifica had an occupancy of only 66.2% and Acton Courtyard had an occupancy of 69.0%. These properties will not return to the same store portfolio until they are stabilized for all of the current and comparable periods presented.
(2)Includes three properties containing 853 apartment units that are owned by the Company but the entire projects are master leased to a third party corporate housing provider and the Company earns monthly net rental income.
(3)Includes properties in various stages of lease-up and properties where lease-up has been completed but the properties were not stabilized for the comparable periods presented.

The Company's acquisition, disposition and completed development activities also impacted overall results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The impacts of these activities are discussed in greater detail in the following

46


paragraphs.
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2016 to the year ended December 31, 2015
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company reported diluted earnings per share/unit of $11.68 compared to $2.36 per share/unit for the year ended December 31, 2015. The difference is primarily due to approximately $3.7 billion in higher gains on property sales and lower depreciation expense in 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 as a direct result of the significant sales activity in 2016, partially offset by significantly higher debt extinguishment costs in 2016 compared to 2015.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, income from continuing operations increased approximately $3.6 billion when compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in continuing operations is discussed below.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, consolidated rental income decreased 11.5%, consolidated operating expenses (comprising of property and maintenance and real estate taxes and insurance) decreased 11.6% and consolidated NOI decreased 11.5% when compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The declines are all primarily a result of the Company's significant disposition activity in 2016.
Revenues from the 2016 Same Store Properties increased $78.1 million primarily as a result of an increase in average rental rates charged to residents. Expenses from the 2016 Same Store Properties increased $20.2 million primarily as a result of an increase in real estate taxes, on-site payroll costs, repairs and maintenance expenses and leasing and advertising expenses, partially offset by lower utility costs. The following tables provide comparative same store results and statistics for the 2016 Same Store Properties:
2016 vs. 2015
Same Store Results/Statistics for 69,879 Same Store Apartment Units
$ in thousands (except for Average Rental Rate)
             
  Results Statistics
        
Average
Rental
Rate (1)
    
Description Revenues Expenses NOI  Physical Occupancy (2) Turnover (3)
2016 $2,177,304
 $634,120
 $1,543,184
 $2,597
 96.0% 54.4%
2015 $2,099,166
 $613,924
 $1,485,242
 $2,504
 96.1% 54.5%
Change $78,138
 $20,196
 $57,942
 $93
 (0.1%) (0.1%)
Change 3.7% 3.3% 3.9% 3.7%    
Note: Same store operating expenses and same store NOI no longer include an allocation of property management expenses either in the current or comparable periods.
(1)Average Rental Rate – Total residential rental revenues divided by the weighted average occupied apartment units for the reporting period
presented.
(2)Physical Occupancy – The weighted average occupied apartment units for the reporting period divided by the average of total apartment
units available for rent for the reporting period.
(3)Turnover – Total residential move-outs divided by total residential apartment units, including inter-property and intra-property transfers.

The following table provides comparative same store operating expenses for the 2016 Same Store Properties:

47


2016 vs. 2015
Same Store Operating Expenses for 69,879 Same Store Apartment Units
$ in thousands
          % of Actual
2016
Operating
Expenses
  Actual
2016
 Actual
2015
 $
Change
 %
Change
 
      
Real estate taxes $264,689
 $249,916
 $14,773
 5.9% 41.7%
On-site payroll (1) 141,996
 137,731
 4,265
 3.1% 22.4%
Utilities (2) 88,261
 91,586
 (3,325) (3.6%) 13.9%
Repairs and maintenance (3) 81,600
 79,366
 2,234
 2.8% 12.9%
Insurance 17,055
 16,428
 627
 3.8% 2.7%
Leasing and advertising 9,928
 8,341
 1,587
 19.0% 1.6%
Other on-site operating expenses (4) 30,591
 30,556
 35
 0.1% 4.8%
Same store operating expenses $634,120
 $613,924
 $20,196
 3.3 % 100.0%
Note: Same store operating expenses and same store NOI no longer include an allocation of property management expenses either in the current or comparable periods.
(1)On-site payroll – Includes payroll and related expenses for on-site personnel including property managers, leasing consultants and
maintenance staff.
(2)Utilities – Represents gross expenses prior to any recoveries under the Resident Utility Billing System (“RUBS”). Recoveries are reflected
in rental income.
(3)Repairs and maintenance – Includes general maintenance costs, apartment unit turnover costs including interior painting, routine landscaping,
security, exterminating, fire protection, snow removal, elevator, roof and parking lot repairs and other miscellaneous building repair and
maintenance costs.
(4)Other on-site operating expenses – Includes ground lease costs and administrative costs such as office supplies, telephone and data charges
and association and business licensing fees.

The following tables present reconciliations of operating income per the consolidated statements of operations to NOI, along with rental income, operating expenses and NOI per the consolidated statements of operations allocated between same store and non-same store results:

48


  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015
  (Amounts in thousands)
Operating income $856,086
 $1,009,238
     
Adjustments:    
Fee and asset management revenue (3,567) (8,387)
Property management 82,015
 86,206
General and administrative 57,840
 64,664
Depreciation 705,649
 765,895
Total NOI $1,698,023
 $1,917,616
  

 

Rental income:    
Same store $2,177,304
 $2,099,166
Non-same store 244,929
 637,412
Total rental income 2,422,233
 2,736,578
  

 

Operating expenses:    
Same store 634,120
 613,924
Non-same store 90,090
 205,038
Total operating expenses 724,210
 818,962
     
NOI:    
Same store 1,543,184
 1,485,242
Non-same store 154,839
 432,374
Total NOI $1,698,023
 $1,917,616

For properties that the Company acquired or completed that were stabilized prior to January 1, 2016 and that the Company expects to continue to own through December 31, 2017, the Company anticipates the following same store results for the full year ending December 31, 2017:
2017 Same Store Assumptions
Physical occupancy95.7%
Revenue change1.0% to 2.25%
Expense change3.0% to 4.0%
NOI change0.0% to 2.0%

The Company anticipates consolidated rental acquisitions of $500.0 million and consolidated rental dispositions of $500.0 million and expects that the Acquisition Cap Rate will be 0.75% lower than the Disposition Yield for the full year ending December 31, 2017.
These 2017 assumptions are based on current expectations and are forward-looking.

Non-same store NOI results decreased approximately $277.5 million compared to the same period in 2015 and consist primarily of properties acquired in calendar years 2015 and 2016, operations from the Company’s development properties and operations prior to disposition from 2016 sold properties (including the Starwood Portfolio). This decrease primarily resulted from:

The lost NOI from 2015 and 2016 dispositions of $333.2 million;
A decrease in operating activities from other miscellaneous properties (including three master-leased properties) of $1.2 million;
A decrease in operating activities from other miscellaneous operations; and
A partial offset from development and newly stabilized development properties in lease-up of $50.8 million and

49


operating properties acquired in 2015 and 2016 of $15.2 million.

speculative purposes.  See also Note 17 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s segment disclosures.

Fee and asset management revenues decreased approximately $4.8 million or 57.5% primarily as a result of lower revenue earned on management of the Company's military housing ventures at Joint Base Lewis McChord due to the sale of the Company's entire interest in the management contracts and related rights associated with these ventures in the second quarter of 2016 as well as lower fees earned on management of the Company's unconsolidated joint ventures.

Property management expenses from continuing operations include off-site expenses associated with the self-management of the Company’s properties as well as management fees paid to any third party management companies. These expenses decreased approximately $4.2 million or 4.9%. This decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in payroll-related costs, office rent and education conference fees, partially offset by increases in computer operations costs. The Company anticipates that property management expenses will approximate $83.0 million to $85.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2017. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.

General and administrative expenses from continuing operations, which include corporate operating expenses, decreased approximately $6.8 million or 10.6% primarily due to a decrease in payroll-related costs, partially offset by an increase in directors fees and office rent. The Company anticipates that general and administrative expenses will approximate $50.0 million to $52.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2017, excluding charges of approximately $0.4 million related to the Company's current executive compensation program. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.

Depreciation expense from continuing operations, which includes depreciation on non-real estate assets, decreased approximately $60.2 million or 7.9% primarily as a result of no depreciation or a partial period of depreciation expense during the year ended December 31, 2016 related to the significant property sales in 2016 (including the Starwood Portfolio), partially offset by additional depreciation expense on properties acquired in 2016 and development properties placed in service.

Interest and other income from continuing operations increased approximately $58.4 million primarily due to the approximate $52.4 million gain from the sale of the Company's entire interest in the management contracts and related rights associated with the military housing ventures at Joint Base Lewis McChord and approximate $6.0 million gain from the sale of 421-a real estate tax certificates during the year ended December 31, 2016, neither of which occurred in 2015. The Company anticipates that interest and other income will approximate $0.5 million for the year ending December 31, 2017. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.

Other expenses from continuing operations increased approximately $7.4 million primarily due to increases in litigation/environmental reserve and/or settlement costs, property acquisition costs incurred in conjunction with the Company's 2016 acquisitions and the expensing of overhead (pursuit cost write-offs) as a result of fewer new development opportunities.

Interest expense from continuing operations, including amortization of deferred financing costs, increased approximately $39.6 million or 8.7% primarily as a result of prepayment penalties and debt extinguishment costs associated with the repayment of approximately $1.7 billion in debt principal prior to scheduled maturity, partially offset by lower interest expense as a result of these repayments. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company capitalized interest costs of approximately $51.5 million as compared to $59.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This capitalization of interest relates to consolidated projects under development. The effective interest cost on all indebtedness for the year ended December 31, 2016 was 4.68% as compared to 4.72% for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company anticipates that interest expense from continuing operations, excluding debt extinguishment costs/prepayment penalties, will approximate $362.6 million to $379.0 million and capitalized interest will approximate $23.0 million to $28.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2017. The above assumptions are based on current expectations and are forward-looking.

Income and other tax expense from continuing operations increased approximately $0.7 million or 75.9% primarily due to increases in various state and local taxes related to the Company's elevated disposition activity in 2016 vs. 2015. The Company anticipates that income and other tax expense will approximate $0.5 million to $1.5 million for the year ending December 31, 2017. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.

Income from investments in unconsolidated entities decreased approximately $10.2 million or 68.0% primarily due to $18.6 million in favorable litigation settlements which occurred during the year ended December 31, 2015, partially offset by a gain on the sale of one unconsolidated apartment property totaling $8.8 million which occurred during the year ended December 31, 2016.

50



Net gain on sales of real estate properties increased approximately $3.7 billion as a result of the sale of 98 consolidated apartment properties (including the Starwood Portfolio) during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to only eight consolidated apartment property sales during the year ended December 31, 2015, all of which did not meet the new criteria for reporting discontinued operations. See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Net gain on sales of land parcels increased approximately $15.7 million due to the gain on sale of three land parcels during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to no land sales during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Discontinued operations, net increased approximately $0.1 million or 30.5% between the periods under comparison. This increase is primarily due to the timing of trailing activity for properties sold in 2013 and prior years. The Company adopted the new discontinued operations standard effective January 1, 2014 and as a result, none of the properties sold during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 met the new criteria for reporting discontinued operations.  See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2015 to the year ended December 31, 2014
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company reported diluted earnings per share/unit of $2.36 compared to $1.73 per share/unit for the year ended December 31, 2014. The difference is primarily due to approximately $122.3 million in higher gains on property sales as well as improved operations in 2015 vs. 2014.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, income from continuing operations increased approximately $250.5 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in continuing operations is discussed below.

Revenues from the 2015 Same Store Properties increased $125.3 million primarily as a result of an increase in average rental rates charged to residents, higher occupancy and a decrease in turnover. Expenses from the 2015 Same Store Properties increased $20.5 million primarily due to increases in real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance expenses and payroll/property management costs, partially offset by lower utility costs. The following tables provide comparative same store results and statistics for the 2015 Same Store Properties:
2015 vs. 2014
Same Store Results/Statistics for 96,286 Same Store Apartment Units
$ in thousands (except for Average Rental Rate)
             
  Results Statistics
        
Average
Rental
Rate (1)
    
Description Revenues Expenses NOI  Occupancy Turnover
2015 $2,566,705
 $837,880
 $1,728,825
 $2,314
 96.1% 54.5%
2014 $2,441,390
 $817,337
 $1,624,053
 $2,208
 95.8% 54.9%
Change $125,315
 $20,543
 $104,772
 $106
 0.3% (0.4%)
Change 5.1% 2.5% 6.5% 4.8%    
(1)Average rental rate is defined as total rental revenues divided by the weighted average occupied apartment units for the period.

The following table provides comparative same store operating expenses for the 2015 Same Store Properties:

51


2015 vs. 2014
Same Store Operating Expenses for 96,286 Same Store Apartment Units
$ in thousands
          % of Actual
2015
Operating
Expenses
  Actual
2015
 Actual
2014
 $
Change
 %
Change
 
      
Real estate taxes $296,484
 $282,487
 $13,997
 5.0% 35.4%
On-site payroll (1) 174,950
 171,706
 3,244
 1.9% 20.9%
Utilities (2) 118,986
 123,296
 (4,310) (3.5%) 14.2%
Repairs and maintenance (3) 104,033
 98,168
 5,865
 6.0% 12.4%
Property management costs (4) 77,001
 73,242
 3,759
 5.1% 9.2%
Insurance 21,335
 23,909
 (2,574) (10.8%) 2.6%
Leasing and advertising 10,370
 10,605
 (235) (2.2%) 1.2%
Other on-site operating expenses (5) 34,721
 33,924
 797
 2.3% 4.1%
Same store operating expenses $837,880
 $817,337
 $20,543
 2.5 % 100.0%
(1)On-site payroll – Includes payroll and related expenses for on-site personnel including property managers, leasing consultants and maintenance staff.
(2)Utilities – Represents gross expenses prior to any recoveries under the Resident Utility Billing System (“RUBS”). Recoveries are reflected in rental income.
(3)Repairs and maintenance – Includes general maintenance costs, apartment unit turnover costs including interior painting, routine landscaping, security, exterminating, fire protection, snow removal, elevator, roof and parking lot repairs and other miscellaneous building repair costs.
(4)Property management costs – Includes payroll and related expenses for departments, or portions of departments, that directly support on-site management. These include such departments as regional and corporate property management, property accounting, human resources, training, marketing and revenue management, procurement, real estate tax, property legal services and information technology.
(5)Other on-site operating expenses – Includes ground lease costs and administrative costs such as office supplies, telephone and data charges and association and business licensing fees.

The following table presents a reconciliation of operating income per the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income to NOI for the 2015 Same Store Properties:
  Year Ended December 31,
  2015 2014
  (Amounts in thousands)
Operating income $1,009,238
 $921,644
Adjustments:    
Non-same store operating results (107,606) (103,123)
Fee and asset management revenue (8,387) (9,437)
Fee and asset management expense 5,021
 5,429
Depreciation 765,895
 758,861
General and administrative 64,664
 50,679
Same store NOI $1,728,825
 $1,624,053

Non-same store operating results increased approximately $4.5 million and consist primarily of properties acquired in calendar years 2014 and 2015 as well as operations from the Company’s completed development properties. This increase primarily resulted from:

Development and newly stabilized development properties in lease-up of $27.8 million;
Operating properties acquired in 2014 and 2015 of $18.1 million;
Operating activities from other miscellaneous operations; and
Was mostly offset by lost NOI from 2014 and 2015 dispositions of $41.8 million as well as a decrease in operating activities from other miscellaneous properties (including three master-leased properties) of $2.2 million.

See also Note 17 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s segment disclosures.

52



Fee and asset management revenues decreased approximately $1.1 million or 11.1% primarily as a result of lower revenue earned on management of the Company's military housing ventures at Joint Base Lewis McChord and lower fees earned on management of the Company's unconsolidated development joint ventures.

Property management expenses from continuing operations include off-site expenses associated with the self-management of the Company’s properties as well as management fees paid to any third party management companies. These expenses increased approximately $1.1 million or 1.3%. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in payroll-related costs and education/conferences fees.

General and administrative expenses from continuing operations, which include corporate operating expenses, increased approximately $14.0 million or 27.6% primarily due to an increase in payroll-related costs, including an additional $8.0 million related to the Company's revised executive compensation program.

Depreciation expense from continuing operations, which includes depreciation on non-real estate assets, increased approximately $7.0 million or 0.9% primarily as a result of additional depreciation expense on properties acquired in 2014 and 2015, development properties placed in service and capital expenditures for all properties owned, partially offset by no depreciation or a partial period of depreciation expense during the year ended December 31, 2015 for properties sold in 2015 and 2014 and properties classified as held for sale at December 31, 2015.

Interest and other income from continuing operations increased approximately $2.9 million or 65.2% primarily due to the settlement of various litigation/insurance claims during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Other expenses from continuing operations decreased approximately $6.1 million or 67.6% primarily due to litigation settlement costs recorded during the year ended December 31, 2014 that did not reoccur in 2015 as well as a reduction in the reserve for a litigation matter recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015, partially offset by an increase in the expensing of overhead (pursuit cost write-offs) as a result of a more active focus on sourcing new development opportunities.

Interest expense from continuing operations, including amortization of deferred financing costs, decreased approximately $13.3 million or 2.8% primarily as a result of the repayment of $300.0 million of 6.584% unsecured notes in April 2015, the repayment of $500.0 million of 5.25% unsecured notes in September 2014, the repayment of the Company's $750.0 million unsecured term loan facility in June 2014, mortgage payoffs and higher capitalized interest, partially offset by interest expense on $750.0 million of unsecured notes that closed in May 2015 and $1.2 billion of unsecured notes that closed in June 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company capitalized interest costs of approximately $59.9 million as compared to $52.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This capitalization of interest primarily relates to consolidated projects under development. The effective interest cost on all indebtedness for the year ended December 31, 2015 was 4.72% as compared to 4.74% for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Income and other tax expense from continuing operations decreased approximately $0.5 million or 34.2% primarily due to decreases in estimated taxes related to properties sold and/or operated by the Company's TRS in 2015 vs. 2014.

Income from investments in unconsolidated entities increased approximately $23.0 million primarily due to gains on the sale of certain assets owned by the Company's joint ventures with a joint venture partner and due to $18.6 million in favorable litigation settlements, neither of which occurred during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Net gain on sales of real estate properties increased approximately $122.4 million or 57.6% as a result of higher gains on the sale of eight consolidated apartment properties during the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to ten consolidated property sales during the year ended December 31, 2014, all of which did not meet the new criteria for reporting discontinued operations. See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Net gain on sales of land parcels decreased approximately $5.3 million due to the gain on sale of three land parcels during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to no land sales during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Discontinued operations, net decreased approximately $1.2 million or 74.9% between the periods under comparison. This decrease is primarily due to the Company's adoption of the new discontinued operations standard effective January 1, 2014. None of the properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 met the new criteria for reporting discontinued operations and as a result, the amounts included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 represent trailing activity for properties sold in 2013 and prior years.  See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

53


Liquidity and Capital Resources

EQR issues public equity from time to time and guarantees certain debt of the Operating Partnership. EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership.

As of January 1, 2016, the Company had approximately $42.3 million of cash and cash equivalents and the amount available on its revolving credit facility was $2.07 billion (net of $45.1 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and net of $387.5 million outstanding on the commercial paper program). After taking into effect the various transactions discussed in the following paragraphs and the net cash provided by operating activities, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance at December 31, 2016 was approximately $77.2 million and the amount available on its revolving credit facility was $1.96 billion (net of $20.6 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and net of the $20.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program).

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company generated proceeds from various transactions, which included the following:

Disposed of 98 consolidated rental properties (including the Starwood Portfolio) and three land parcels, receiving net proceeds of approximately $6.8 billion;
Disposed of one unconsolidated rental property, receiving net proceeds of approximately $12.4 million;
Disposed of its entire interest in the management contracts and related rights associated with the military housing ventures at Joint Base Lewis McChord along with the sale of certain 421-a real estate tax certificates, receiving net proceeds of approximately $72.8 million;
Issued $500.0 million of ten-year 2.85% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $496.7 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of approximately 3.10%; and
Issued approximately 0.9 million Common Shares related to share option exercises and ESPP purchases and received net proceeds of $39.5 million, which were contributed to the capital of the Operating Partnership in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis).

During the year ended December 31, 2016 , the above proceeds along with net cash flow from operations and availability on the Company's revolving line of credit and commercial paper program were primarily utilized to:

Acquire four consolidated rental properties for approximately $205.9 million in cash;
Invest $566.8 million primarily in development projects;
Pay a special dividend of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10 2016 to shareholders/unitholders of record as of March 3, 2016 and a special dividend of $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016 to shareholders/unitholders of record as of September 26, 2016;
Repay $591.7 million of mortgage loans and incur a prepayment penalty of approximately $31.7 million;
Repay $500.0 million of 5.125% unsecured notes maturing in 2016 and incur a prepayment penalty of approximately $1.4 million;
Repay $400.0 million of 5.375% unsecured notes maturing in 2016 and incur a prepayment penalty of approximately $9.5 million;
Repay $255.9 million of 5.750% unsecured notes maturing in 2017 and incur a prepayment penalty of approximately $16.5 million;
Repay $46.1 million of 7.125% unsecured notes maturing in 2017 and incur a prepayment penalty of approximately $4.6 million;
Repay $250.0 million of 4.625% unsecured notes maturing in 2021 and incur a prepayment penalty of approximately $31.6 million; and
Repay $48.0 million of 7.570% unsecured notes maturing in 2026 and incur a prepayment penalty of approximately $19.3 million.

In September 2009, EQR announced the establishment of an At-The-Market (“ATM”) share offering program which would allow EQR to sell Common Shares from time to time into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. Per the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds from all equity offerings to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis). EQR may, but shall have no obligation to, sell Common Shares through the ATM share offering program in amounts and at times to be determined by EQR. Actual sales will depend on a variety of factors to be determined by EQR from time to time, including (among others) market conditions, the trading price of EQR’s Common Shares and determinations of the appropriate sources of funding for EQR. The program currently has a maturity of June 2019. EQR has the authority to issue 13.0 million shares but has

54


not issued any shares under this program since September 2012. Through February 17, 2017, EQR has cumulatively issued approximately 16.7 million Common Shares at an average price of $48.53 per share for total consideration of approximately $809.9 million.

Depending on its analysis of market prices, economic conditions and other opportunities for the investment of available capital, EQR may repurchase its Common Shares pursuant to its existing share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Trustees. The Company may repurchase up to 13.0 million Common Shares under this program. EQR repurchased approximately $1.8 million (31,240 shares at a price of $56.87 per share) of its Common Shares (all related to the vesting of employees' restricted shares) during the year ended December 31, 2014. No open market repurchases have occurred since 2008. As of February 17, 2017, EQR has remaining authorization to repurchase up to 13.0 million of its shares. See Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Depending on its analysis of prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors, the Company may from time to time seek to repurchase and retire its outstanding debt in open market or privately negotiated transactions.

The Company’s total debt summary and debt maturity schedules as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:
Debt Summary as of December 31, 2016
($ in thousands)
        Weighted
Average
Maturities
(years)
      Weighted
Average
Rates (1)
 
       
  Amounts (1) % of Total  
Secured $4,119,181
 45.8% 4.34% 6.0
Unsecured 4,868,077
 54.2% 4.48% 10.0
Total$8,987,258
 100.0% 4.42% 8.2
Fixed Rate Debt:        
Secured – Conventional $3,483,389
 38.7% 4.95% 4.9
Unsecured – Public 4,397,829
 49.0% 4.90% 10.8
Fixed Rate Debt7,881,218
 87.7% 4.92% 8.2
Floating Rate Debt:        
Secured – Conventional 7,042
 0.1% 0.56% 16.9
Secured – Tax Exempt 628,750
 7.0% 1.06% 11.8
Unsecured – Public (2) 450,250
 5.0% 1.28% 2.5
Unsecured – Revolving Credit Facility 
 
 1.37% 5.0
Unsecured – Commercial Paper Program (3) 19,998
 0.2% 0.90% 
Floating Rate Debt 1,106,040
 12.3% 1.13% 8.0
Total $8,987,258
 100.0% 4.42% 8.2
(1)Net of the effect of any derivative instruments. Weighted average rates are for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(2)Fair value interest rate swaps convert the $450.0 million 2.375% notes due July 1, 2019 to a floating interest rate of 90-Day LIBOR plus 0.61%.
(3)As of December 31, 2016, the weighted average maturity on the Company's outstanding commercial paper was 4 days.
Note: The Company capitalized interest of approximately $51.5 million and $59.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Note: The Company recorded approximately $24.3 and $8.6 million of net debt discount/deferred derivative settlement amortization as additional interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

55


Debt Maturity Schedule as of December 31, 2016
($ in thousands)
             
          Weighted
Average Rates
on Fixed
Rate Debt (1)
 Weighted
Average
Rates on
Total Debt (1)
           
  Fixed
Rate (1)
 Floating
Rate (1)
      
Year  Total % of Total  
             
2017 $605,158
 $23,300
(2)$628,458
 6.9% 6.19% 5.99%
2018 83,634
 100,735
 184,369
 2.0% 5.57% 3.24%
2019 807,680
 478,357
 1,286,037
 14.1% 5.47% 3.96%
2020 1,679,590
 10,500
 1,690,090
 18.6% 5.49% 5.46%
2021 928,557
 12,600
 941,157
 10.3% 4.64% 4.59%
2022 266,447
 13,800
 280,247
 3.1% 3.27% 3.14%
2023 1,327,965
 15,300
 1,343,265
 14.8% 3.74% 3.71%
2024 2,498
 17,100
 19,598
 0.2% 4.97% 1.23%
2025 452,625
 19,600
 472,225
 5.2% 3.38% 3.27%
2026 594,783
 21,700
 616,483
 6.8% 3.59% 3.49%
2027+ 1,177,033
 457,665
 1,634,698
 18.0% 4.54% 3.46%
Subtotal 7,925,970
 1,170,657
 9,096,627
 100.0% 4.72% 4.20%
Deferred Financing Costs (33,605) (9,012) (42,617) N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Premium/(Discount) (11,147) (55,605) (66,752) N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Total $7,881,218
 $1,106,040
 $8,987,258
 100.0% 4.72% 4.20%
(1)Net of the effect of any derivative instruments. Weighted average rates are as of December 31, 2016.
(2)Includes $20.0 million in principal outstanding on the Company's unsecured commercial paper program. The company may borrow up to a maximum of $500.0 million on the program subject to market conditions.

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s unsecured debt as of December 31, 2016:

56


Unsecured Debt Summary as of December 31, 2016
($ in thousands)
       
  Interest Rate Due
Date
 Amount
    
Fixed Rate Notes:      
  5.750% 06/15/17 $394,077
  7.125% 10/15/17 103,898
  4.750% 07/15/20 600,000
  4.625% 12/15/21 750,000
  3.000% 04/15/23 500,000
  3.375% 06/01/25 450,000
  7.570% 08/15/26 92,025
  2.850% 11/01/26 500,000
  4.500% 07/01/44 750,000
  4.500% 06/01/45 300,000
Deferred Financing Costs and Unamortized (Discount)     (42,171)
      4,397,829
Floating Rate Notes:      
  (1) 07/01/19 450,000
Fair Value Derivative Adjustments (1) 07/01/19 1,857
Deferred Financing Costs and Unamortized (Discount)     (1,607)
      450,250
       
Line of Credit and Commercial Paper:      
Revolving Credit Facility (2) (3) LIBOR+0.825% 01/10/22 
Commercial Paper Program (2) (4)     20,000
Unamortized Commercial Paper (Discount)     (2)
      19,998
       
Total Unsecured Debt     $4,868,077
(1)Fair value interest rate swaps convert the $450.0 million 2.375% notes due July 1, 2019 to a floating interest rate of 90-Day LIBOR plus 0.61%.
(2)Facility/program is private. All other unsecured debt is public.
(3)On November 3, 2016, the Company replaced its existing $2.5 billion facility with a new $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing January 10, 2022. The interest rate on advances under the new credit facility will generally be LIBOR plus a spread (currently 0.825%) and an annual facility fee (currently 12.5 basis points). Both the spread and the facility fee are dependent on the credit rating of the Company's long term debt. As of December 31, 2016, there was approximately $1.96 billion available on the Company's unsecured revolving credit facility (net of $20.6 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and $20.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program).
(4)The Company may borrow up to a maximum of $500.0 million on the commercial paper program subject to market conditions. The notes bear interest at various floating rates with a weighted average of 0.90% for the year ended December 31, 2016 and a weighted average maturity of 4 days as of December 31, 2016.

EQR and ERPOP currently have an active universal shelf registration statement for the issuance of equity and debt securities that automatically became effective upon filing with the SEC on June 28, 2016 and expires on June 28, 2019. Per the terms of ERPOP's partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds of all equity offerings to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis) or preference units (on a one-for-one preferred share per preference unit basis).

The Company’s “Consolidated Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization Ratio” as of December 31, 2016 is presented in the following table. The Company calculates the equity component of its market capitalization as the sum of (i) the total outstanding Common Shares and assumed conversion of all Units at the equivalent market value of the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange and (ii) the liquidation value of all perpetual preferred shares outstanding.


57


Equity Residential
Capital Structure as of December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands except for share/unit and per share amounts)
           
Secured Debt     $4,119,181
 45.8%  
Unsecured Debt     4,868,077
 54.2%  
Total Debt     8,987,258
 100.0% 26.8%
Common Shares (includes Restricted Shares) 365,870,924
 96.2%      
Units (includes OP Units and Restricted Units) 14,626,075
 3.8%      
Total Shares and Units 380,496,999
 100.0%      
Common Share Price at December 31, 2016 $64.36
        
      24,488,787
 99.8%  
Perpetual Preferred Equity (see below)     37,280
 0.2%  
Total Equity     24,526,067
 100.0% 73.2%
Total Market Capitalization     $33,513,325
   100.0%

Equity Residential
Perpetual Preferred Equity as of December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands except for share and per share amounts)
           
        Annual
Dividend
Per Share
 Annual
Dividend
Amount
  Redemption
Date
 Outstanding
Shares
 Liquidation
Value
  
Series     
Preferred Shares:          
8.29% Series K 12/10/26 745,600
 $37,280
 $4.145
 $3,091
Total Perpetual Preferred Equity   745,600
 $37,280
   $3,091

The Operating Partnership’s “Consolidated Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization Ratio” as of December 31, 2016 is presented in the following table. The Operating Partnership calculates the equity component of its market capitalization as the sum of (i) the total outstanding Units at the equivalent market value of the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange and (ii) the liquidation value of all perpetual preference units outstanding.

ERP Operating Limited Partnership
Capital Structure as of December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)
           
Secured Debt     $4,119,181
 45.8%  
Unsecured Debt     4,868,077
 54.2%  
Total Debt     8,987,258
 100.0% 26.8%
Total Outstanding Units 380,496,999
        
Common Share Price at December 31, 2016 $64.36
        
      24,488,787
 99.8%  
Perpetual Preference Units (see below)     37,280
 0.2%  
Total Equity     24,526,067
 100.0% 73.2%
Total Market Capitalization     $33,513,325
   100.0%

ERP Operating Limited Partnership
Perpetual Preference Units as of December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts)
           
        Annual
Dividend
Per Unit
 Annual
Dividend
Amount
  Redemption
Date
 Outstanding
Units
 Liquidation
Value
  
Series     
Preference Units:          
8.29% Series K 12/10/26 745,600
 $37,280
 $4.145
 $3,091
Total Perpetual Preference Units   745,600
 $37,280
   $3,091


58


The Company generally expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements, including capital expenditures related to maintaining its existing properties and scheduled unsecured note and mortgage note repayments, through its working capital, net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility and commercial paper program. Under normal operating conditions, the Company considers its cash provided by operating activities to be adequate to meet operating requirements and payments of distributions.

The Company has a flexible dividend policy which it believes will generate payouts closely aligned with the actual annual operating results of the Company’s core business and provide transparency to investors. Beginning in 2014, the Company began paying its annual dividend based on 65% of the midpoint of the range of Normalized FFO guidance customarily provided as part of the Company's fourth quarter earnings release. The Company's 2016 regular annual dividend payout was $2.015 per share/unit and the Company paid four regular quarterly dividends of $0.50375 per share/unit in 2016. In addition to the regular quarterly dividends, the Company paid two special dividends to its shareholders and holders of OP Units of $11.00 per share/unit in the aggregate. The Company paid special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016. All future dividends remain subject to the discretion of the Board of Trustees.

While our current dividend policy makes it less likely that we will over distribute, it will also lead to a dividend reduction more quickly should operating results deteriorate or large portfolio sales occur. However, whether due to changes in the dividend policy or otherwise, there may be times when the Company experiences shortfalls in its coverage of distributions, which may cause the Company to consider reducing its distributions and/or using the proceeds from property dispositions or additional financing transactions to make up the difference. Should these shortfalls occur for lengthy periods of time or be material in nature, the Company's financial condition may be adversely affected and it may not be able to maintain its current distribution levels. The Company believes that its expected 2017 operating cash flow will be sufficient to cover capital expenditures and regular dividends/distributions.

The Company also expects to meet its long-term liquidity requirements, such as lump sum unsecured note and mortgage debt maturities, property acquisitions, financing of construction and development activities through the issuance of secured and unsecured debt and equity securities, including additional OP Units, proceeds received from the disposition of certain properties and joint ventures and cash generated from operations after all distributions. In addition, the Company has significant unencumbered properties available to secure additional mortgage borrowings in the event that the public capital markets are unavailable or the cost of alternative sources of capital is too high. The fair value of and cash flow from these unencumbered properties are in excess of the requirements the Company must maintain in order to comply with covenants under its unsecured notes, line of credit and commercial paper program. Of the $25.4 billion in investment in real estate on the Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2016, $18.7 billion or 73.8% was unencumbered. However, there can be no assurances that these sources of capital will be available to the Company in the future on acceptable terms or otherwise.

ERPOP's long-term senior debt ratings and short-term commercial paper ratings as well as EQR's long-term preferred equity ratings as of February 17, 2017 are as follows:
Standard & Poor'sMoody'sFitch
ERPOP's long-term senior debt ratingA-Baa1 (1)A-
ERPOP's short-term commercial paper ratingA-2P-2F-2
EQR's long-term preferred equity ratingBBBBaa2 (2)BBB
(1)Moody's rated ERPOP's long-term senior debt with a positive outlook.
(2)Moody's rated EQR's long-term preferred equity with a positive outlook.

The long-term ratings listed above were reaffirmed following the Company's announcement of the Starwood Transaction and other 2016 dispositions.

On November 3, 2016, the Company replaced its existing $2.5 billion facility with a $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing January 10, 2022. The Company has the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $750.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase their commitments. The interest rate on advances under the facility will generally be LIBOR plus a spread (currently 0.825%), or based on bids received from the lending group, and the Company pays an annual facility fee (currently 12.5 basis points). Both the spread and the facility fee are dependent on the credit rating of the Company's long-term debt.


59


The Company's previous $2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility was set to mature on April 2, 2018. The Company had the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $500.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase their commitments. The interest rate on advances under the facility was generally LIBOR plus a spread (was 0.95% at termination), or based on bids received from the lending group, and the Company paid an annual facility fee (was 15 basis points at termination). Both the spread and the facility fee were dependent on the credit rating of the Company’s long-term debt.

On February 2, 2015, the Company entered into an unsecured commercial paper note program in the United States. The Company may borrow up to a maximum of $500.0 million under this program subject to market conditions. The notes will be sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and will rank pari passu with all of the Company's other unsecured senior indebtedness. The Company does not intend to borrow more than $2.0 billion on the commercial paper program and new revolving credit facility combined. As of February 17, 2017, there was a balance of $100.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program.

As of February 17, 2017, no amounts were outstanding and the amount available on the revolving credit facility was $1.88 billion (net of $20.6 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and net of the $100.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program). This facility may, among other potential uses, be used to fund property acquisitions, costs for certain properties under development and short-term liquidity requirements.

See Note 18 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the events which occurred subsequent to December 31, 2016.

Capitalization of Fixed Assets and Improvements to Real Estate

Our policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize expenditures that improve the value of the property or extend the useful life of the component asset of the property. We track improvements to real estate in two major categories and several subcategories:

Replacements (inside the apartment unit). These include:
flooring such as carpets, hardwood, vinyl or tile;
appliances;
mechanical equipment such as individual furnace/air units, hot water heaters, etc;
furniture and fixtures such as kitchen/bath cabinets, light fixtures, ceiling fans, sinks, tubs, toilets, mirrors, countertops, etc; and
blinds.

All replacements are depreciated over a five to ten-year estimated useful life. We expense as incurred all make-ready maintenance and turnover costs such as cleaning, interior painting of individual apartment units and the repair of any replacement item noted above.

Building improvements (outside the apartment unit). These include:
roof replacement and major repairs;
paving or major resurfacing of parking lots, curbs and sidewalks;
amenities and common areas such as pools, exterior sports and playground equipment, lobbies, clubhouses, laundry rooms, alarm and security systems and offices;
major building mechanical equipment systems;
interior and exterior structural repair and exterior painting and siding;
major landscaping and grounds improvement; and
vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.

All building improvements are depreciated over a five to fifteen-year estimated useful life. We capitalize building improvements and upgrades only if the item: (i) exceeds $2,500 (selected projects must exceed $10,000); (ii) extends the useful life of the asset; and (iii) improves the value of the asset.


60


For the year ended December 31, 2016, our actual improvements to real estate totaled approximately $172.2 million. This includes the following (amounts in thousands except for apartment unit and per apartment unit amounts):
Capital Expenditures to Real Estate
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
               
  Total
Apartment
Units (1)
 Replacements
 (2)
 Avg. Per
Apartment
Unit
 Building
Improvements (3)
 Avg. Per
Apartment
Unit
 Total Avg. Per
Apartment
Unit
Same Store Properties (4) 69,879
 $75,298
 $1,077
 $80,890
 $1,158
 $156,188
 $2,235
Non-Same Store Properties (5) 6,634
 4,494
 851
 7,685
 1,456
 12,179
 2,307
Other (6) 
 2,744
   1,066
   3,810
  
Total 76,513
 $82,536
   $89,641
   $172,177
  
(1)Total Apartment Units – Excludes 945 unconsolidated apartment units for which capital expenditures to real estate are self-funded and do not consolidate into the Company's results.
(2)Replacements – Includes new expenditures inside the apartment units such as appliances, mechanical equipment, fixtures and flooring, including carpeting. Replacements for same store properties also include $47.0 million spent during 2016 on apartment unit renovations/rehabs (primarily kitchens and baths) on approximately 4,200 same store apartment units (equating to approximately $11,200 per apartment unit rehabbed) designed to reposition these units for higher rental levels in their respective markets.
(3)Building Improvements – Includes roof replacement, paving, amenities and common areas, building mechanical equipment systems, exterior painting and siding, major landscaping, vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.
(4)Same Store Properties – Primarily includes all properties acquired or completed that are stabilized prior to January 1, 2015, less properties subsequently sold.
(5)Non-Same Store Properties – Primarily includes all properties acquired during 2015 and 2016, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2015. Per apartment unit amounts are based on a weighted average of 5,279 apartment units.
(6)Other – Primarily includes expenditures for properties sold and properties under development.


For the year ended December 31, 2015, our actual improvements to real estate totaled approximately $182.1 million. This includes the following (amounts in thousands except for apartment unit and per apartment unit amounts):
Capital Expenditures to Real Estate
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
               
  
Total
Apartment
Units (1)
 Replacements (2) 
Avg. Per
Apartment
Unit
 Building
Improvements (3)
 
Avg. Per
Apartment
Unit
 Total 
Avg. Per
Apartment
Unit
Same Store Properties (4) 96,286
 $98,120
 $1,019
 $75,294
 $782
 $173,414
 $1,801
Non-Same Store Properties (5) 6,946
 1,870
 335
 6,293
 1,127
 8,163
 1,462
Other (6) 
 302
  
 234
  
 536
  
Total 103,232
 $100,292
  
 $81,821
  
 $182,113
  
(1)Total Apartment Units – Excludes 1,281 unconsolidated apartment units and 5,139 military housing apartment units for which capital expenditures to real estate are self-funded and do not consolidate into the Company's results.
(2)Replacements – Includes new expenditures inside the apartment units such as appliances, mechanical equipment, fixtures and flooring, including carpeting. Replacements for same store properties also include $60.6 million spent in 2015 on apartment unit renovations/rehabs (primarily kitchens and baths) on 6,499 same store apartment units (equating to about $9,300 per apartment unit rehabbed) designed to reposition these assets for higher rental levels in their respective markets.
(3)Building Improvements – Includes roof replacement, paving, amenities and common areas, building mechanical equipment systems, exterior painting and siding, major landscaping, vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.
(4)Same Store Properties – Primarily includes all properties acquired or completed and stabilized prior to January 1, 2014, less properties subsequently sold.
(5)Non-Same Store Properties – Primarily includes all properties acquired during 2014 and 2015, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2014. Per apartment unit amounts are based on a weighted average of 5,582 apartment units.
(6)Other – Primarily includes expenditures for properties sold and properties under development.

The Company estimates that during 2017 it will spend approximately $2,600 per apartment unit of capital expenditures, inclusive of apartment unit renovation/rehab costs, or $1,900 per apartment unit excluding apartment unit renovation/rehab costs. During 2017, the Company expects to spend approximately $50.0 million for all unit renovation/rehab costs (primarily on same store properties) at a weighted average cost of $11,000 per apartment unit rehabbed. These anticipated amounts represent an

61


increase as a percentage of rental revenues, in the cost per unit and in the absolute dollar amounts over 2016. These increases include approximately $17.0 million of additional estimated expenditures for resident focused renovation projects such as common areas and exercise rooms in order to remain competitive with the new luxury supply being delivered in many of our markets. We will continue to create value from our properties by doing those rehabs that meet our investment parameters. The above assumptions are based on current expectations and are forward-looking.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s total non-real estate capital additions, such as computer software, computer equipment, and furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements to the Company’s property management offices and its corporate offices, were approximately $5.7 million. The Company expects to fund approximately $3.1 million in total non-real estate capital additions in 2017. These anticipated fundings represent a decrease over 2016, which is primarily driven by the substantial completion of the implementation of new systems during 2016. The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.

Capital expenditures to real estate and non-real estate capital additions are generally funded from net cash provided by operating activities and from investment cash flow.

Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes. The Company seeks to manage these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments. The Company may also use derivatives to manage commodity prices in the daily operations of the business.

The Company has a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivatives are designed to hedge, the Company has not sustained a material loss from these instruments nor does it anticipate any material adverse effect on its net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives it currently has in place.

See Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of derivative instruments atinstruments.

The Company had total variable rate debt of $1.4 billion, representing 15.3% of total debt, and $1.4 billion, representing 16.4% of total debt as of December 31, 2016.


Other

Total distributions paid2019 and 2018, respectively.  If interest rates had been 100 basis points higher in January 2017 amounted to $192.32019 and 2018 and average balances coincided with year end balances, our annual interest expense would have been $13.8 million (excluding distributions on Partially Owned Properties), which included certain distributions declared duringand $14.5 million higher, respectively.  Unsecured notes issued under the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The Company has various unconsolidated interests in certain joint ventures. The Company does not believe that these unconsolidated investments have a materially different impact on its liquidity, cash flows, capital resources, credit or market risk than its consolidated operating and/or other activities.

Operating Properties

The Company has a 75% equity interest inCompany’s commercial paper program are treated as variable rate debt for the Wisconsin Place joint venture. The project contains a mixed-use site located in Chevy Chase, Maryland consisting of residential, retail, office and accessory uses, including underground parking facilities. The joint venture owns the 432 unit residential component, but has no ownership interest in the retail and office components. The joint venture also retains an unconsolidated interest in an entity that owns the land underlying the entire project and owns and operates the parking facility. At December 31, 2016, the basispurposes of this investment was $46.9 million. The joint venture, as a limited partner, does not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the entity. As a result, the entity qualifies as a VIE. The joint venture doescalculation even though they do not have a controlling financialstated interest rate, given their short-term nature.  The effect of derivatives, if applicable, is also considered when computing the total amount of variable rate debt.

Changes in interest rates also affect the VIE and is not the VIE's primary beneficiary. The joint venture does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance or the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. As a result, the entity that owns the land and owns and operates the parking facility is unconsolidated and recorded using the equity method of accounting.


The Company has a 20% equity interest in each of the Nexus Sawgrass and Domain joint ventures. The Nexus Sawgrass joint venture owns a 501 unit apartment property located in Sunrise, Florida and the Company's interest had a basis of $5.0 million at December 31, 2016. The Domain joint venture owns a 444 unit apartment property located in San Jose, California and the

62


Company's interest had a basis of $9.3 million at December 31, 2016. Nexus Sawgrass and Domain were completed and stabilized during the quarters ended September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2015, respectively. Construction on both properties was predominantly funded with long-term, non-recourse secured loans from the partner. The mortgage loan on Nexus Sawgrass has a current unconsolidated outstanding balance of $48.6 million, bears interest at 5.60% and matures January 1, 2021. The mortgage loan on Domain has a current unconsolidated outstanding balance of $96.8 million, bears interest at 5.75% and matures January 1, 2022. While the Company is the managing member of both of the joint ventures, was responsible for constructing both of the properties and gave certain construction cost overrun guarantees, the joint venture partner has significant participating rights and has active involvement in and oversight of the operations. As a result, the entities do not qualify as VIEs. The Company alone does not have the power to direct the activities of the entities that most significantly impact the entities' economic performance and as a result, the entities are unconsolidated and recorded using the equity method of accounting. The Company currently has no further funding obligations related to these properties.

Other

On February 27, 2013, in connection with the acquisition of Archstone, subsidiaries of the Company entered into three limited liability company agreements (collectively, the “Residual JV”). The Residual JV owned certain Archstone assets and succeeded to certain residual Archstone liabilities/litigation. The Residual JV is owned 60% by the Company and 40% by its joint venture partner. The Company's initial investment was $147.6 million and the Company's basis at December 31, 2016 was a net obligation of $1.1 million. The Residual JV is managed by a Management Committee consisting of two members from each of the Company and its joint venture partner. Both partners have equal participation in the Management Committee and all significant participating rights are shared by both partners. As a result, the Residual JV does not qualify as a VIE. The Company alone does not have the power to direct the activities of the Residual JV that most significantly impact the Residual JV's economic performance and as a result, the Residual JV is unconsolidated and recorded using the equity method of accounting. The Residual JV has sold all of the real estate assets that were acquired as part of the acquisition of Archstone, including all of the German assets, and is in the process of winding down all remaining activities.

On February 27, 2013, in connection with the acquisition of Archstone, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a limited liability company agreement (the “Legacy JV”), through which they assumed obligations of Archstone in the form of preferred interests, some of which are governed by tax protection arrangements. At December 31, 2016, the remaining preferred interests had an aggregate liquidationestimated fair market value of $39.9 million, our share of which is included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Obligations of the Legacy JV are borne 60% by the Company and 40% by its joint venture partner. The Legacy JV is managed byfixed rate debt, computed using a Management Committee consisting of two members from each of the Company and its joint venture partner. Both partners have equal participation in the Management Committee and all significant participating rights are shared by both partners. As a result, the Legacy JV does not qualify as a VIE. The Company alone does not have the power to direct the activities of the Legacy JV that most significantly impact the Legacy JV's economic performance and as a result, the Legacy JV is unconsolidated and recorded using the equity method of accounting.

discounted cash flow model.  As of December 31, 2016, the Company has six wholly owned projects totaling 2,064 apartment units in various stages of development with estimated completion dates ranging through December 31, 2018, as well as other completed development projects that are in various stages of lease up or are stabilized. See also Note 16 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company's development projects.

See also Notes 2 and 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s investments in partially owned entities.

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations for the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2016:
Payments Due by Year (in thousands)
Contractual Obligations 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Unamortized Cost/Discounts Total
Debt:  
  
  
  
  
  
    
Principal (a) $628,458
 $184,369
 $1,286,037
 $1,690,090
 $941,157
 $4,366,516
 $(109,369) $8,987,258
Interest (b) 367,157
 331,165
 285,074
 222,930
 188,420
 1,471,663
 
 2,866,409
Operating Leases:  
  
  
  
  
  
    
Minimum Rent Payments (c) 15,917
 16,027
 15,890
 15,489
 15,256
 826,259
 
 904,838
Other Long-Term Liabilities:  
  
  
  
    
    
Deferred Compensation (d) 1,387
 1,723
 1,128
 1,079
 1,079
 4,383
 
 10,779
Total $1,012,919
 $533,284
 $1,588,129
 $1,929,588
 $1,145,912
 $6,668,821
 $(109,369) $12,769,284

63


(a)Amounts include aggregate principal payments only.
(b)Amounts include interest expected to be incurred on the Company’s secured and unsecured debt based on obligations outstanding at December 31, 2016 and inclusive of capitalized interest. For floating rate debt, the current rate in effect for the most recent payment through December 31, 2016 is assumed to be in effect through the respective maturity date of each instrument.
(c)Minimum basic rent due for various office space the Company leases and fixed base rent due on ground leases for 11 properties.
(d)Estimated payments to the Company's Chairman, Vice Chairman and one former CEO based on actual and planned retirement dates.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different or different assumptions were made, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, resulting in different financial results or different presentation of our financial statements.

The Company’significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These policies were followed in preparing the consolidated financial statements at and for the year ended December 31, 2016 and are consistent with the year ended December 31, 2015.

The Company has identified five significant accounting policies as critical accounting policies. These critical accounting policies are those that have the most impact on the reporting of our financial condition and those requiring significant judgments and estimates. With respect to these critical accounting policies, management believes that the application of judgments and estimates is consistently applied and produces financial information that fairly presents the results of operations for all periods presented. The five critical accounting policies are:

Acquisition of Investment Properties

The Company allocates the purchase price of properties to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on their fair values. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property, our own analysis of recently acquired and existing comparable properties in our portfolio and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, including its investments in real estate, for indicators of impairment. The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions and legal and environmental concerns, as well as the Company’s ability to hold and its intent with regard to each asset. Future events could occur which would cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.

Depreciation of Investment in Real Estate

The Company depreciates the building component of its investment in real estate over a 30-year estimated useful life, building improvements over a 5-year to 15-year estimated useful life and both the furniture, fixtures and equipment and replacement components over a 5-year to 10-year estimated useful life, all of which are judgmental determinations.
Cost Capitalization
See the Capitalization of Fixed Assets and Improvements to Real Estate section for a discussion of the Company’s policy with respect to capitalization vs. expensing of fixed asset/repair and maintenance costs. In addition, the Company capitalizes an allocation of the payroll and associated costs of employees directly responsible for and who spend their time on the execution and supervision of major capital and/or renovation projects. These costs are reflected on the balance sheets as increases to depreciable property.
For all development projects, the Company uses its professional judgment in determining whether such costs meet the criteria for capitalization or must be expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes interest, real estate taxes and insurance and

64


payroll and associated costs for those individuals directly responsible for and who spend their time on development activities, with capitalization ceasing no later than 90 days following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. These costs are reflected on the balance sheets as construction-in-progress for each specific property. The Company expenses as incurred all payroll costs of on-site employees working directly at our properties, except as noted above on our development properties prior to certificate of occupancy issuance and on specific major renovations at selected properties when additional incremental employees are hired.

During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company capitalized $18.7 million, $22.3 million and $22.4 million, respectively, of payroll and associated costs of employees directly responsible for and who spend their time on the execution and supervision of development activities as well as major capital and/or renovation projects.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Including Derivative Instruments

The valuation of financial instruments requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. The Company, where possible, bases the fair values of its financial instruments, including its derivative instruments, on listed market prices and third party quotes. Where these are not available, the Company bases its estimates on current instruments with similar terms and maturities or on other factors relevant to the financial instruments.

Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations

The following is the Company's and the Operating Partnership's reconciliation of net income to FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units for each of the five years ended December 31, 2016:

65


Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations
(Amounts in thousands)
   
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Net income$4,480,104
 $908,018
 $658,683
 $1,905,353
 $881,204
Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties(16,430) (3,657) (2,544) 538
 (844)
Preferred/preference distributions(3,091) (3,357) (4,145) (4,145) (10,355)
Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares/Preference Units
 (3,486) 
 
 (5,152)
Net income available to Common Shares and Units / Units4,460,583
 897,518
 651,994
 1,901,746
 864,853
Adjustments:         
    Depreciation705,649
 765,895
 758,861
 978,973
 560,669
Depreciation – Non-real estate additions(5,224) (4,981) (4,643) (4,806) (5,346)
Depreciation – Partially Owned Properties(3,805) (4,332) (4,285) (6,499) (3,193)
Depreciation – Unconsolidated Properties4,745
 4,920
 6,754
 3,661
 
Net (gain) on sales of unconsolidated entities – operating assets(8,841) (100) (4,902) (7) 
Net (gain) on sales of real estate properties(4,044,055) (335,134) (212,685) 
 
Noncontrolling Interests share of gain on sales14,521
 
 
 
 
Discontinued operations:         
    Depreciation
 
 
 34,380
 124,323
    Net (gain) on sales of discontinued operations(43) 
 (179) (2,036,505) (548,278)
Net incremental gain (loss) on sales of condominium units
 
 
 8
 (11)
Gain on sale of Equity Corporate Housing (ECH)
 
 
 1,470
 200
FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (1) (3) (4)1,123,530
 1,323,786
 1,190,915
 872,421
 993,217
Adjustments:         
    Asset impairment and valuation allowances
 
 
 
 
Property acquisition costs and write-off of pursuit costs6,478
 (11,706) 8,248
 79,365
 21,649
Debt extinguishment (gains) losses, including prepayment penalties, preferred share/         
    preference unit redemptions and non-cash convertible debt discounts121,694
 5,704
 (1,110) 121,730
 16,293
(Gains) losses on sales of non-operating assets, net of income and other tax expense         
    (benefit)(74,221) (2,883) (1,866) (17,908) (255)
    Other miscellaneous non-comparable items2,169
 2,901
 259
 1,465
 (147,635)
Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (2) (3) (4)$1,179,650
 $1,317,802
 $1,196,446
 $1,057,073
 $883,269
           
FFO (1) (3)$1,126,621
 $1,330,629
 $1,195,060
 $876,566
 $1,008,724
Preferred/preference distributions(3,091) (3,357) (4,145) (4,145) (10,355)
Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares/Preference Units
 (3,486) 
 
 (5,152)
FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (1) (3) (4)$1,123,530
 $1,323,786
 $1,190,915
 $872,421
 $993,217
           
Normalized FFO (2) (3)$1,182,741
 $1,321,159
 $1,200,591
 $1,061,218
 $893,624
Preferred/preference distributions(3,091) (3,357) (4,145) (4,145) (10,355)
Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units (2) (3) (4)$1,179,650
 $1,317,802
 $1,196,446
 $1,057,073
 $883,269

(1)The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines funds from operations (“FFO”) (April 2002 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”)), excluding gains (or losses) from sales and impairment write-downs of depreciable operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. The April 2002 White Paper states that gain or loss on sales of property is excluded from FFO for previously depreciated operating properties only.

(2)Normalized funds from operations (“Normalized FFO”) begins with FFO and excludes:
the impact of any expenses relating to non-operating asset impairment and valuation allowances;
property acquisition and other transaction costs related to mergers and acquisitions and pursuit cost write-offs;
gains and losses from early debt extinguishment, including prepayment penalties, preferred share/preference unit redemptions and the cost related to the implied option value of non-cash convertible debt discounts;
gains and losses on the sales of non-operating assets, including gains and losses from land parcel sales, net of the effect of income tax benefits or expenses; and
other miscellaneous items.



66


(3)The Company believes that FFO and FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are helpful to investors as supplemental measures of the operating performance of a real estate company, because they are recognized measures of performance by the real estate industry and by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of depreciable property and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO and FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units can help compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. The Company also believes that Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are helpful to investors as supplemental measures of the operating performance of a real estate company because they allow investors to compare the Company’s operating performance to its performance in prior reporting periods and to the operating performance of other real estate companies without the effect of items that by their nature are not comparable from period to period and tend to obscure the Company’s actual operating results. FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units do not represent net income, net income available to Common Shares / Units or net cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Therefore, FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units should not be exclusively considered as alternatives to net income, net income available to Common Shares / Units or net cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP or as a measure of liquidity. The Company’s calculation of FFO, FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units, Normalized FFO and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units may differ from other real estate companies due to, among other items, variations in cost capitalization policies for capital expenditures and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other real estate companies.

(4)FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units and Normalized FFO available to Common Shares and Units / Units are calculated on a basis consistent with net income available to Common Shares / Units and reflects adjustments to net income for preferred distributions and premiums on redemption of preferred shares/preference units in accordance with GAAP. The equity positions of various individuals and entities that contributed their properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units are collectively referred to as the “Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership”. Subject to certain restrictions, the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership may exchange their OP Units for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risks relating to the Company’s financial instruments result primarily from changes in short-term LIBOR interest rates and changes in the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ("SIFMA") index for tax-exempt debt. The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to the unsecured revolving credit facility and commercial paper program, the floating rate tax-exempt debt and the fair value hedges that convert fixed rate debt to floating rate debt as well as exposure on the refinancing of its debt. The Company typically incurs fixed rate debt obligations to finance acquisitions while it typically incurs floating rate debt obligations to finance working capital needs and as a temporary measure in advance of securing long-term fixed rate financing. The Company continuously evaluates its level of floating rate debt with respect to total debt and other factors, including its assessment of the current and future economic environment. To the extent the Company carries substantial cash balances, this will tend to partially counterbalance any increase or decrease in interest rates.

The Company also utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to manage market risk. Interest rate protection agreements are used to convert floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis or vice versa as well as to partially lock in rates on future debt issuances. Derivatives are used for hedging purposes rather than speculation. The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes. See also Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of derivative instruments.

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments (including such items in the financial statement captions as cash and cash equivalents, other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities) approximate their carrying or contract values based on their nature, terms and interest rates that approximate current market rates. The fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes payable and unsecured debt (including its commercial paper) were approximately $4.2 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2016.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had total outstanding floating rate debt of approximately $1.1 billion, or 12.3% of total debt, net of the effects of any derivative instruments. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently increased by 11 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the increase in interest expense on the floating rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.3 million. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently decreased by 11 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the decrease in interest expense on the floating rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.3 million.

At December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had total outstanding fixed rate debt of approximately $7.9$7.7 billion, or 87.7%84.7% of total debt, netwith an estimated fair market value of the effects of any derivative instruments.$8.2 billion.  If marketinterest rates of interest permanently increased by 49had been 100 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates),lower as of December 31, 2019, the estimated fair market value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would behave increased by approximately $7.2 billion. If market rates$664.4 million.  As of interest permanently decreased by 49 basis points (a 10% decrease

67


from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $8.8 billion.

At December 31, 2016, the Company’s derivative instruments had a net asset fair value of approximately $1.9 million. If market rates of interest permanently increased by 24 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net asset fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $0.4 million. If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 24 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net asset fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $3.4 million.
At December 31, 2015, the Company had total outstanding floating rate debt of approximately $1.5 billion, or 14.1% of total debt, net of the effects of any derivative instruments. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently increased by 8 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the increase in interest expense on the floating rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.2 million. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently decreased by 8 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the decrease in interest expense on the floating rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.2 million.

At December 31, 2015,2018, the Company had total outstanding fixed rate debt of approximately $9.4$7.4 billion, or 85.9%83.6% of total debt, netwith an estimated fair market value of the effects of any derivative instruments.$7.4 billion.  If marketinterest rates of interest permanently increased by 51had been 100 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates),lower as of December 31, 2018, the estimated fair market value would have increased by approximately $514.3 million.

42


Table of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $8.6 billion. If market ratesContents

The Company had no outstanding derivative instruments as of interest permanently decreased by 51 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $10.5 billion.


At December 31, 2015, the Company’s2019 and had derivative instruments hadwith a net assetliability fair value of approximately $3.0 million.$10.1 million as of December 31, 2018.  If interest rates had been 27 basis points (representing 10% of the weighted average of the then prevailing market rates of interest permanentlyrates) lower on December 31, 2018, the liability would have increased by 17 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net asset fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $1.8$11.3 million. If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 17 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net asset fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $4.2 million.

These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the Company’s financial instruments. The foregoing assumptions apply to the entire amount of the Company’s debt and derivative instruments and do not differentiate among maturities.  These analyses do not consider the effects of the changes in overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment.  Further, in the event of changes of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate its exposure to thethese changes.  However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, this analysis assumes no changes in the Company’s financial structure or results.


The Company cannot predict the effect of adverse changes in interest rates on its debt and derivative instruments and, therefore, its exposure to market risk, nor can there be any assurance that long-term debt will be available at advantageous pricing.  Consequently, future results may differ materially from the estimated adverse changes discussed above.


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


None.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures


Equity Residential


(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

Effective as of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15.  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and


68


reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

Equity Residential’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.  Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework).


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.


Based on the Company’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2019.  Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited as of December 31, 20162019 by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.


(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

There were no changes to the internal control over financial reporting of the Company identified in connection with the Company’s evaluation referred to above that occurred during the fourth quarter of 20162019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


43


Table of Contents

ERP Operating Limited Partnership


(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

Effective as of December 31, 2016,2019, the Operating Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of EQR, of the effectiveness of the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15.  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in its Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC'sSEC’s rules and forms.


(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

ERP Operating Limited Partnership'sPartnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.  Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of EQR, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework).


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.


Based on the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2019.  Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited as of December 31, 20162019 by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.


(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

There were no changes to the internal control over financial reporting of the Operating Partnership identified in connection with the Operating Partnership’s evaluation referred to above that occurred during the fourth quarter of 20162019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.


Item 9B. Other Information


None.



69

44



PART III


Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

Trustees, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation; Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters; Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence; and Principal Accounting Fees and Services.


Services

The information required by Item 10, Item 11, Item 12, Item 13 and Item 14 is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, Equity Residential'sResidential’s Proxy Statement, which the Company intends to file no later than 120 days after the end of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019, and thus these items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. Equity Residential is the general partner and 96.2%96.4% owner of ERP Operating Limited Partnership.



70

45



PART IV


Item 15.  Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules.


Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

(1)

Financial Statements: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

(2)

Exhibits: See the Exhibit Index.

(3)

Financial Statement Schedules: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.



71

Item 16.  Form 10-K Summary

None.

46


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this report.  References to exhibits or other filings under the caption “Location” indicate that the exhibit or other filing has been filed, that the indexed exhibit and the exhibit referred to are the same and that the exhibit referred to is incorporated by reference.  The Commission file numbers for our Exchange Act filings referenced below are 1-12252 (Equity Residential) and 0-24920 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership).

Exhibit

Description

Location

  3.1

Articles of Restatement of Declaration of Trust of Equity Residential dated December 9, 2004.

Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Residential’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

  3.2

Eighth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Equity Residential, effective as of October 1, 2015.

Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Residential's Form 8-K dated and filed on October 1, 2015.

  3.3

First Amendment to Eighth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Equity Residential, dated November 20, 2017.

Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Residential's Form 8-K dated and filed on November 20, 2017.

  3.4

Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership for ERP Operating Limited Partnership dated as of March 12, 2009.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated March 12, 2009, filed on March 18, 2009.

  4.1

Description of Equity Residential Common Shares Registered Under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Attached herein.

  4.2

Description of ERP Operating Limited Partnership Notes Registered Under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Attached herein.

  4.3

Description of ERP Operating Limited Partnership OP Units Registered Under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Attached herein.

  4.4

Indenture, dated October 1, 1994, between the Operating Partnership and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee (“Indenture”).

Included as Exhibit 4(a) to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form S-3 filed on October 7, 1994. **

  4.5

First Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of September 9, 2004.

Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on September 10, 2004.

  4.6

Second Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of August 23, 2006.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated August 16, 2006, filed on August 23, 2006.

  4.7

Third Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2007.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated May 30, 2007, filed on June 1, 2007.

  4.8

Fourth Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of December 12, 2011.

Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated December 7, 2011, filed on December 9, 2011.

  4.9

Fifth Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2016.

Included as Exhibit 4.6 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

  4.10

Form of 4.625% Note due December 15, 2021.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated December 7, 2011, filed on December 9, 2011.

  4.11

Form of 3.00% Note due April 15, 2023.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated April 3, 2013, filed on April 8, 2013.

  4.12

Form of 3.375% Note due June 1, 2025.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated May 11, 2015, filed on May 13, 2015.

  4.13

Terms Agreement regarding 7.57% Notes due August 15, 2026.

Included as Exhibit 1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on August 13, 1996.

  4.14

Form of 2.850% Note due November 1, 2026.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated October 4, 2016, filed on October 7, 2016.

  4.15

Form of 3.250% Note due August 1, 2027.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated July 31, 2017, filed on August 2, 2017.

  4.16

Form of 3.500% Note due March 1, 2028.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 1, 2018, filed on February 6, 2018.

47


Table of Contents


  4.17

Form of 4.150% Note due December 1, 2028.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated November 28, 2018, filed on November 29, 2018.

  4.18

Form of 3.000% Note due July 1, 2029.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated June 17, 2019, filed on June 20, 2019.

  4.19

Form of 2.500% Note due February 15, 2030.

Included as Exhibit 4.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated August 20, 2019, filed on August 22, 2019.

  4.20

Form of 4.500% Note due July 1, 2044.

Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated June 16, 2014, filed on June 18, 2014.

  4.21

Form of 4.500% Note due June 1, 2045.

Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated May 11, 2015, filed on May 13, 2015.

  4.22

Form of 4.000% Note due August 1, 2047.

Included as Exhibit 4.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated July 31, 2017, filed on August 2, 2017.

10.1

*

Noncompetition Agreement (Zell).

Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential's Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158. **

10.2

*

Noncompetition Agreement (Spector).

Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential's Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158. **

10.3

*

Form of Noncompetition Agreement (other officers).

Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential's Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158. **

10.4

Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2019, among ERP Operating Limited Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the financial institutions party thereto.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated November 1, 2019, filed on November 4, 2019.

10.5

Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Lexford Properties, L.P.

Included as Exhibit 10.16 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.

10.6

*

Equity Residential 2019 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 99.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated June 27, 2019, filed on July 1, 2019.

10.7

*

Equity Residential 2011 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 99.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated June 16, 2011, filed on June 22, 2011.

10.8

*

First Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012.

10.9

*

Second Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013.

10.10

*

Third Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014.

10.11

*

Fourth Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014.

10.12

*

Fifth Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016.

10.13

*

Sixth Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.18 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

10.14

*

Seventh Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017.

10.15

*

Equity Residential Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan dated December 10, 2008.

Included as Exhibit 10.15 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

48


Table of Contents

10.16

*

First Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.

10.17

*

Second Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.3 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011.

10.18

*

Third Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012.

10.19

*

Fourth Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013.

10.20

*

Form of 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan Award Agreement.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018.

10.21

*

Form of Change in Control/Severance Agreement between the Company and other executive officers.

Included as Exhibit 10.13 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

10.22

*

Form of First Amendment to Amended and Restated Change in Control/Severance Agreement with each executive officer.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009.

10.23

*

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each trustee and executive officer.

Included as Exhibit 10.18 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

10.24

*

Form of Letter Agreement between Equity Residential and Alan W. George.

Included as Exhibit 10.3 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.

10.25

*

Form of Executive Retirement Benefits Agreement.

Included as Exhibit 10.24 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

10.26

*

Retirement Benefits Agreement between Samuel Zell and the Company dated October 18, 2001.

Included as Exhibit 10.18 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

10.27

*

Rule of 70 Retirement Agreement, dated February 28, 2018, by and between Equity Residential and David S. Santee.

Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018.

10.28

*

Age 62 Retirement Agreement, dated September 4, 2018, by and between Equity Residential and David J. Neithercut.

Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018.

10.29

*

The Equity Residential Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated effective April 1, 2017.

Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017.

10.30

*

The Equity Residential Grandfathered Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2005.

Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008.

10.31

Distribution Agreement, dated June  6, 2019, among the Company, the Operating Partnership, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Bank of America, N.A., BofA Securities, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon, BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, MUFG Securities EMEA plc, MUFG Securities Americas Inc., The Bank of Nova Scotia, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., UBS AG, London Branch and UBS Securities LLC.

Included as Exhibit 1.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed on June 6, 2019.

10.32

Form of Master Forward Sale Confirmation.

Included as Exhibit 1.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed on June 6, 2019.

10.33

Archstone Residual JV, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.

Included as Exhibit 10.3 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.

10.34

Archstone Parallel Residual JV, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.

Included as Exhibit 10.4 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.

10.35

Archstone Parallel Residual JV 2, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.

Included as Exhibit 10.5 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.

49


Table of Contents


10.36

Legacy Holdings JV, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.

Included as Exhibit 10.6 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.

21

List of Subsidiaries of Equity Residential and ERP Operating Limited Partnership.

Attached herein.

23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - Equity Residential.

Attached herein.

23.2

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - ERP Operating Limited Partnership.

Attached herein.

24

Power of Attorney.

See the signature page to this report.

31.1

Equity Residential - Certification of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Executive Officer.

Attached herein.

31.2

Equity Residential - Certification of Robert A. Garechana, Chief Financial Officer.

Attached herein.

31.3

ERP Operating Limited Partnership - Certification of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant's General Partner.

Attached herein.

31.4

ERP Operating Limited Partnership - Certification of Robert A. Garechana, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant's General Partner.

Attached herein.

32.1

Equity Residential - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Attached herein.

32.2

Equity Residential - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Robert A. Garechana, Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

Attached herein.

32.3

ERP Operating Limited Partnership - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant's General Partner.

Attached herein.

32.4

ERP Operating Limited Partnership - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Robert A. Garechana, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant's General Partner.

Attached herein.

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

*Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements filed as exhibits to this report are identified by an asterisk.

**Filed on paper – hyperlink is not required pursuant to Rule 105 of Regulation S-T.

50


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

By:

/s/ Mark J. Parrell

By: /s/ David

Mark J. Neithercut

David J. Neithercut
Parrell

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:

February 23, 2017



Date:

February 20, 2020

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

BY: EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ITS GENERAL PARTNER

By:

/s/ DavidMark J. NeithercutParrell

David

Mark J. Neithercut

Parrell

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:

Date:

February 23, 201720, 2020





EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL MEN/WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below, hereby constitutes and appoints David J. Neithercut, Mark J. Parrell, Robert A. Garechana and Ian S. Kaufman, or any of them, his or her attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him or her in any and all capacities, to do all acts and things which said attorneys and agents, or any of them, deem advisable to enable the company to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any requirements or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereof, in connection with the company’s filing of an annual report on Form 10-K for the company’s fiscal year 2016,2019, including specifically, but without limitation of the general authority hereby granted, the power and authority to sign his or her name as a trustee or officer, or both, of the company, as indicated below opposite his or her signature, to the Form 10-K, and any amendment thereto; and each of the undersigned does hereby fully ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agents, or any of them, or the substitute of any of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of each registrant and in the capacities set forth below and on the dates indicated:


Name

Title

Date

NameTitleDate

/s/  DavidMark J. NeithercutParrell

President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

David

Mark J. NeithercutParrell

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/  Mark J. ParrellRobert A. Garechana

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 23, 201720, 2020

Mark J. Parrell

Robert A. Garechana

(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/  Ian S. Kaufman

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

February 23, 201720, 2020

Ian S. Kaufman

(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ John W. AlexanderTrusteeFebruary 23, 2017
John W. Alexander

/s/  Charles L. Atwood

Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

Charles L. Atwood

/s/  Raymond Bennett

Trustee

February 20, 2020

Raymond Bennett

/s/  Linda Walker Bynoe

Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

Linda Walker Bynoe

/s/  Connie K. Duckworth

Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

Connie K. Duckworth

/s/  Mary Kay Haben

Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

Mary Kay Haben

/s/  T. Zia Huque

Trustee

February 20, 2020

T. Zia Huque

/s/  Bradley A. Keywell

Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

Bradley A. Keywell

/s/  John E. Neal

Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

John E. Neal

/s/  David J. Neithercut

Trustee

February 20, 2020

David J. Neithercut

/s/  Mark S. Shapiro

Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

Mark S. Shapiro

/s/  Stephen E. Sterrett

Trustee

February 23, 201720, 2020

Stephen E. Sterrett

/s/  B. Joseph WhiteSamuel Zell

TrusteeFebruary 23, 2017
B. Joseph White
/s/ Gerald A. SpectorVice

Chairman of the Board of Trustees

February 23, 201720, 2020

Gerald A. Spector
/s/

Samuel Zell

Chairman of the Board of Trustees

February 23, 2017
Samuel Zell




INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE


EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


PAGE

PAGE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Financial Statements (Equity Residential)

to F-3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Financial Statements (ERP Operating Limited Partnership)

F-4

F-5

F-6

Financial Statements of Equity Residential:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018

F-7

2017

F-9

2017

2017

Financial Statements of ERP Operating Limited Partnership:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018

2017

2017

F-20

2017

F-22

F-56

SCHEDULE FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

S-12

All other schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable, not required or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees and Shareholders

Equity Residential


Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Equity Residential (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015 and2018, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Equity Residentialthe Company at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016,2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Equity Residential’sthe Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 23, 201720, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


Adoption of New Accounting Standard

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases effective January 1, 2019.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.  

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the account or disclosure to which it relates.

F-2


Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Description of

the Matter

At December 31, 2019, the Company’s net investment in real estate was approximately $20.3 billion. As more fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, including its investment in real estate, for impairment. The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions, legal and environmental concerns, the Company’s intent and ability to hold the related asset, as well as any significant cost overruns on development properties.  If the expected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the long-lived asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying amount.  

Auditing the Company's process to evaluate long-lived assets for impairment was complex due to a high degree of subjectivity in determining whether indicators of impairment were present, and in determining the future undiscounted cash flows and estimated fair values, if necessary, of long-lived assets where impairment indicators were determined to be present. In particular, these estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions, including the estimation of future rental revenues, operating expenses and capitalization rates, which are affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions.    

How We

Addressed the

Matter in

Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s long-lived asset impairment evaluation and measurement process, including controls over management’s determination and review of the significant assumptions used in the analyses and described above.

To test the Company’s evaluation of long-lived assets for impairment, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, evaluating the indicators of impairment identified by management and testing the significant assumptions and completeness and accuracy of operating data used by the Company in its analyses. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to current market data and performed sensitivity analyses of certain significant assumptions as discussed above.  We also involved our valuation specialist to assist in evaluating certain assumptions used, including future rental revenues and operating expenses, and capitalization rates.

/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1996.

Chicago, Illinois

February 23, 201720, 2020



F-2


F-3



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Partners

ERP Operating Limited Partnership


Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”)Operating Partnership) as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015 and2018, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ERPthe Operating Limited Partnership at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016,2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), ERPthe Operating Limited Partnership'sPartnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 23, 201720, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


Adoption of New Accounting Standard

Asdiscussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Operating Partnership changed its method of accounting for leases effective January 1, 2019.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We have served as the Operating Partnership’s auditor since 1996.

Chicago, Illinois

February 23, 201720, 2020




F-3


F-4



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees and Shareholders

Equity Residential


Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Equity Residential’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO Criteria)criteria). In our opinion, Equity Residential’sResidential (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 20, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.


We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directorstrustees of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 20, 2020


In our opinion, Equity Residential maintained, in all material respects, effective


F-5


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners

ERP Operating Limited Partnership

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO Criteria.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Equity Residential as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 and our report dated February 23, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 23, 2017


F-4



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

To the Partners
ERP Operating Limited Partnership

We have audited ERP Operating Limited Partnership's (the “Operating Partnership”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO Criteria)criteria). In our opinion, ERP Operating Limited Partnership'sPartnership (the Operating Partnership) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 20, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Operating Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.


We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Operating Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directorstrustees of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


In our opinion, ERP Operating Limited Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO Criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of ERP Operating Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 and our report dated February 23, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 23, 201720, 2020



F-5

F-6



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands except for share amounts)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

$

5,936,188

 

 

$

5,875,803

 

Depreciable property

 

 

21,319,101

 

 

 

20,435,901

 

Projects under development

 

 

181,630

 

 

 

109,409

 

Land held for development

 

 

96,688

 

 

 

89,909

 

Investment in real estate

 

 

27,533,607

 

 

 

26,511,022

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(7,276,786

)

 

 

(6,696,281

)

Investment in real estate, net

 

 

20,256,821

 

 

 

19,814,741

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

 

52,238

 

 

 

58,349

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

45,753

 

 

 

47,442

 

Restricted deposits

 

 

71,246

 

 

 

68,871

 

Right-of-use assets

 

 

512,774

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

233,937

 

 

 

404,806

 

Total assets

 

$

21,172,769

 

 

$

20,394,209

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

1,941,610

 

 

$

2,385,470

 

Notes, net

 

 

6,077,513

 

 

 

5,933,286

 

Line of credit and commercial paper

 

 

1,017,833

 

 

 

499,183

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

94,350

 

 

 

102,471

 

Accrued interest payable

 

 

66,852

 

 

 

62,622

 

Lease liabilities

 

 

331,334

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

346,963

 

 

 

358,563

 

Security deposits

 

 

70,062

 

 

 

67,258

 

Distributions payable

 

 

218,326

 

 

 

206,601

 

Total liabilities

 

 

10,164,843

 

 

 

9,615,454

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership

 

 

463,400

 

 

 

379,106

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares

   authorized; 745,600 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and

   December 31, 2018

 

 

37,280

 

 

 

37,280

 

Common Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares

   authorized; 371,670,884 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and

   369,405,161 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018

 

 

3,717

 

 

 

3,694

 

Paid in capital

 

 

8,965,577

 

 

 

8,935,453

 

Retained earnings

 

 

1,386,495

 

 

 

1,261,763

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(77,563

)

 

 

(64,986

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

 

10,315,506

 

 

 

10,173,204

 

Noncontrolling Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Partnership

 

 

227,837

 

 

 

228,738

 

Partially Owned Properties

 

 

1,183

 

 

 

(2,293

)

Total Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

229,020

 

 

 

226,445

 

Total equity

 

 

10,544,526

 

 

 

10,399,649

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

21,172,769

 

 

$

20,394,209

 

  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
ASSETS    
Investment in real estate  
  
Land $5,899,862
 $5,864,046
Depreciable property 18,730,579
 18,037,087
Projects under development 637,168
 1,122,376
Land held for development 118,816
 158,843
Investment in real estate 25,386,425
 25,182,352
Accumulated depreciation (5,360,389) (4,905,406)
Investment in real estate, net 20,026,036
 20,276,946
Real estate held for sale 
 2,181,135
Cash and cash equivalents 77,207
 42,276
Investments in unconsolidated entities 60,141
 68,101
Deposits – restricted 76,946
 55,893
Escrow deposits – mortgage 64,935
 56,946
Other assets 398,883
 428,899
Total assets $20,704,148
 $23,110,196
     
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    
Liabilities:    
Mortgage notes payable, net $4,119,181
 $4,685,134
Notes, net 4,848,079
 5,848,956
Line of credit and commercial paper 19,998
 387,276
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 147,482
 187,124
Accrued interest payable 60,946
 85,221
Other liabilities 350,466
 366,387
Security deposits 62,624
 77,582
Distributions payable 192,296
 209,378
Total liabilities 9,801,072
 11,847,058
     
Commitments and contingencies 

 

     
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership 442,092
 566,783
Equity:    
Shareholders’ equity:    
Preferred Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value;
100,000,000 shares authorized; 745,600 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015
 37,280
 37,280
Common Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value;
1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 365,870,924 shares issued
and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 364,755,444
shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015
 3,659
 3,648
Paid in capital 8,758,422
 8,572,365
Retained earnings 1,543,626
 2,009,091
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) (113,909) (152,016)
Total shareholders’ equity 10,229,078
 10,470,368
Noncontrolling Interests:    
Operating Partnership 221,297
 221,379
Partially Owned Properties 10,609
 4,608
Total Noncontrolling Interests 231,906
 225,987
Total equity 10,460,984
 10,696,355
Total liabilities and equity $20,704,148
 $23,110,196

See accompanying notes

F-6

F-7



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Amounts in thousands except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

2,700,691

 

 

$

2,577,681

 

 

$

2,470,689

 

Fee and asset management

 

 

384

 

 

 

753

 

 

 

717

 

Total revenues

 

 

2,701,075

 

 

 

2,578,434

 

 

 

2,471,406

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and maintenance

 

 

446,845

 

 

 

429,335

 

 

 

405,281

 

Real estate taxes and insurance

 

 

366,139

 

 

 

357,814

 

 

 

335,495

 

Property management

 

 

95,344

 

 

 

92,485

 

 

 

85,493

 

General and administrative

 

 

52,757

 

 

 

53,813

 

 

 

52,224

 

Depreciation

 

 

831,083

 

 

 

785,725

 

 

 

743,749

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,792,168

 

 

 

1,719,172

 

 

 

1,622,242

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain (loss) on sales of real estate properties

 

 

447,637

 

 

 

256,810

 

 

 

157,057

 

Impairment

 

 

 

 

 

(702

)

 

 

(1,693

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

 

1,356,544

 

 

 

1,115,370

 

 

 

1,004,528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income

 

 

2,817

 

 

 

15,317

 

 

 

6,136

 

Other expenses

 

 

(18,177

)

 

 

(17,267

)

 

 

(5,186

)

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense incurred, net

 

 

(390,076

)

 

 

(413,360

)

 

 

(383,890

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

(11,670

)

 

 

(11,310

)

 

 

(8,526

)

Income before income and other taxes, income (loss) from investments in

   unconsolidated entities and net gain (loss) on sales of land parcels

 

 

939,438

 

 

 

688,750

 

 

 

613,062

 

Income and other tax (expense) benefit

 

 

2,281

 

 

 

(878

)

 

 

(478

)

Income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities

 

 

65,945

 

 

 

(3,667

)

 

 

(3,370

)

Net gain (loss) on sales of land parcels

 

 

2,044

 

 

 

987

 

 

 

19,167

 

Net income

 

 

1,009,708

 

 

 

685,192

 

 

 

628,381

 

Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Partnership

 

 

(36,034

)

 

 

(24,939

)

 

 

(22,604

)

Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(3,297

)

 

 

(2,718

)

 

 

(2,323

)

Net income attributable to controlling interests

 

 

970,377

 

 

 

657,535

 

 

 

603,454

 

Preferred distributions

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,091

)

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

967,287

 

 

$

654,445

 

 

$

600,363

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

2.61

 

 

$

1.78

 

 

$

1.64

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

 

370,461

 

 

 

368,052

 

 

 

366,968

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

2.60

 

 

$

1.77

 

 

$

1.63

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

 

386,333

 

 

 

383,695

 

 

 

382,678

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
REVENUES  
  
  
Rental income $2,422,233
 $2,736,578
 $2,605,311
Fee and asset management 3,567
 8,387
 9,437
Total revenues 2,425,800
 2,744,965
 2,614,748
       
EXPENSES      
Property and maintenance 406,823
 479,160
 473,098
Real estate taxes and insurance 317,387
 339,802
 325,401
Property management 82,015
 86,206
 85,065
General and administrative 57,840
 64,664
 50,679
Depreciation 705,649
 765,895
 758,861
Total expenses 1,569,714
 1,735,727
 1,693,104
       
Operating income 856,086
 1,009,238
 921,644
       
Interest and other income 65,773
 7,372
 4,462
Other expenses (10,368) (2,942) (9,073)
Interest:  
  
  
Expense incurred, net (482,246) (444,487) (457,460)
Amortization of deferred financing costs (12,633) (10,801) (11,088)
Income before income and other taxes, income (loss) from investments
in unconsolidated entities, net gain (loss) on sales of real estate properties and
land parcels and discontinued operations
 416,612
 558,380
 448,485
Income and other tax (expense) benefit (1,613) (917) (1,394)
Income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities 4,801
 15,025
 (7,952)
Net gain on sales of real estate properties 4,044,055
 335,134
 212,685
Net gain (loss) on sales of land parcels 15,731
 (1) 5,277
Income from continuing operations 4,479,586
 907,621
 657,101
Discontinued operations, net 518
 397
 1,582
Net income 4,480,104
 908,018
 658,683
Net (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests:  
  
  
Operating Partnership (171,511) (34,241) (24,831)
Partially Owned Properties (16,430) (3,657) (2,544)
Net income attributable to controlling interests 4,292,163
 870,120
 631,308
Preferred distributions (3,091) (3,357) (4,145)
Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares 
 (3,486) 
Net income available to Common Shares $4,289,072
 $863,277
 $627,163
       
Earnings per share – basic:  
  
  
Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares $11.75
 $2.37
 $1.73
Net income available to Common Shares $11.75
 $2.37
 $1.74
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding 365,002
 363,498
 361,181
       
Earnings per share – diluted:  
  
  
Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares $11.68
 $2.36
 $1.72
Net income available to Common Shares $11.68
 $2.36
 $1.73
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding 381,992
 380,620
 377,735
       
Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding $13.015
 $2.21
 $2.00

See accompanying notes

F-7

F-8



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year

 

 

(33,765

)

 

 

5,174

 

 

 

6,439

 

Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive

   income

 

 

21,188

 

 

 

18,452

 

 

 

18,858

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(12,577

)

 

 

23,626

 

 

 

25,297

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

997,131

 

 

 

708,818

 

 

 

653,678

 

Comprehensive (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

(38,872

)

 

 

(28,526

)

 

 

(25,845

)

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interests

 

$

958,259

 

 

$

680,292

 

 

$

627,833

 


  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Comprehensive income:  
  
  
Net income $4,480,104
 $908,018
 $658,683
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative instruments:  
  
  
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the year (3,915) 2,219
 (33,306)
Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income 41,758
 18,244
 16,868
Other comprehensive income (loss) – foreign currency:      
Currency translation adjustments arising during the year 264
 (327) (552)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 38,107
 20,136
 (16,990)
Comprehensive income 4,518,211
 928,154
 641,693
Comprehensive (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests (189,411) (38,668) (26,728)
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interests $4,328,800
 $889,486
 $614,965


See accompanying notes

F-8

F-9



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

831,083

 

 

 

785,725

 

 

 

743,749

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

11,670

 

 

 

11,310

 

 

 

8,526

 

Amortization of above/below market lease intangibles

 

 

(71

)

 

 

4,392

 

 

 

3,828

 

Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt

 

 

11,780

 

 

 

22,781

 

 

 

3,536

 

Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments

 

 

21,176

 

 

 

18,440

 

 

 

18,847

 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

 

 

11,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment

 

 

 

 

 

702

 

 

 

1,693

 

Write-off of pursuit costs

 

 

5,529

 

 

 

4,450

 

 

 

3,106

 

(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities

 

 

(65,945

)

 

 

3,667

 

 

 

3,370

 

Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return on capital

 

 

2,621

 

 

 

2,492

 

 

 

2,632

 

Net (gain) loss on sales of real estate properties

 

 

(447,637

)

 

 

(256,810

)

 

 

(157,057

)

Net (gain) loss on sales of land parcels

 

 

(2,044

)

 

 

(987

)

 

 

(19,167

)

Net (gain) loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

13,647

 

 

 

22,110

 

 

 

12,258

 

Realized/unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

Compensation paid with Company Common Shares

 

 

24,449

 

 

 

27,132

 

 

 

24,997

 

Other operating activities, net

 

 

(287

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in other assets

 

 

6,278

 

 

 

4,097

 

 

 

(449

)

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

5,116

 

 

 

(1,862

)

 

 

11,532

 

Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable

 

 

4,230

 

 

 

4,587

 

 

 

(2,911

)

Increase (decrease) in lease liabilities

 

 

(2,269

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

 

 

13,382

 

 

 

16,578

 

 

 

(23,468

)

Increase (decrease) in security deposits

 

 

2,804

 

 

 

2,249

 

 

 

2,385

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

1,456,984

 

 

 

1,356,295

 

 

 

1,265,788

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate – acquisitions

 

 

(1,518,878

)

 

 

(708,092

)

 

 

(466,394

)

Investment in real estate – development/other

 

 

(195,692

)

 

 

(154,431

)

 

 

(276,382

)

Capital expenditures to real estate

 

 

(178,423

)

 

 

(188,501

)

 

 

(202,607

)

Non-real estate capital additions

 

 

(4,955

)

 

 

(4,505

)

 

 

(1,506

)

Interest capitalized for real estate under development

 

 

(6,884

)

 

 

(6,260

)

 

 

(26,290

)

Proceeds from disposition of real estate, net

 

 

1,064,619

 

 

 

691,526

 

 

 

384,583

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

 

(9,604

)

 

 

(6,571

)

 

 

(6,034

)

Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return of capital

 

 

78,262

 

 

 

 

 

 

334

 

Purchase of investment securities and other investments

 

 

(269

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities

 

 

(771,824

)

 

 

(376,834

)

 

 

(594,296

)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:  
  
  
Net income $4,480,104
 $908,018
 $658,683
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
  
  
Depreciation 705,649
 765,895
 758,861
Amortization of deferred financing costs 12,633
 10,801
 11,088
Amortization of above/below market leases 3,426
 3,382
 3,222
Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt (17,378) (9,492) (13,520)
Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments 41,680
 18,075
 16,334
Write-off of pursuit costs 4,092
 3,208
 3,607
(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities (4,801) (15,025) 7,952
Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return on capital 2,863
 4,741
 5,570
Net (gain) on sales of investment securities and other investments (58,409) (526) (57)
Net (gain) on sales of real estate properties (4,044,055) (335,134) (212,685)
Net (gain) loss on sales of land parcels (15,731) 1
 (5,277)
Net (gain) on sales of discontinued operations (43) 
 (179)
Realized/unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments 74
 3,055
 (60)
Compensation paid with Company Common Shares 30,530
 34,607
 27,543
Changes in assets and liabilities:  
  
  
Decrease (increase) in deposits – restricted 11,450
 (1,794) (1,740)
(Increase) decrease in mortgage deposits (26) 258
 1,452
Decrease (increase) in other assets 31,147
 (41,803) 21,773
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses (6,061) (1,667) 17,797
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable (24,275) (4,319) 11,231
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities (26,422) 12,269
 8,437
(Decrease) increase in security deposits (14,958) 1,949
 4,041
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,111,489
 1,356,499
 1,324,073
       
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:  
  
  
Investment in real estate – acquisitions (205,880) (331,336) (469,989)
Investment in real estate – development/other (566,825) (653,897) (530,387)
Capital expenditures to real estate (172,177) (182,113) (185,957)
Non-real estate capital additions (5,731) (3,991) (5,286)
Interest capitalized for real estate and unconsolidated entities under development (51,451) (59,885) (52,782)
Proceeds from disposition of real estate, net 6,824,659
 504,748
 522,647
Investments in unconsolidated entities (5,266) (23,019) (15,768)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return of capital 13,798
 51,144
 103,793
Proceeds from sale of investment securities and other investments 72,815
 2,535
 57
(Increase) decrease in deposits on real estate acquisitions and investments, net (32,503) 17,874
 33,004
Decrease (increase) in mortgage deposits 534
 (531) 798
Consolidation of previously unconsolidated properties 
 
 (44,796)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities 5,871,973
 (678,471) (644,666)

See accompanying notes

F-9

F-10



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt financing costs

 

$

(19,812

)

 

$

(8,583

)

 

$

(6,289

)

Mortgage notes payable, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

295,771

 

 

 

96,935

 

 

 

 

Lump sum payoffs

 

 

(743,021

)

 

 

(1,347,939

)

 

 

(493,420

)

Scheduled principal repayments

 

 

(6,808

)

 

 

(6,629

)

 

 

(10,704

)

Net gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

 

 

(3,381

)

 

 

(22,110

)

 

 

(12,258

)

Notes, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

1,194,468

 

 

 

896,294

 

 

 

692,466

 

Lump sum payoffs

 

 

(1,050,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

(497,975

)

Net gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

 

 

(10,266

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Line of credit and commercial paper:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Line of credit proceeds

 

 

6,010,000

 

 

 

3,805,000

 

 

 

1,845,000

 

Line of credit repayments

 

 

(5,990,000

)

 

 

(3,805,000

)

 

 

(1,845,000

)

Commercial paper proceeds

 

 

15,944,800

 

 

 

14,030,926

 

 

 

5,066,509

 

Commercial paper repayments

 

 

(15,446,150

)

 

 

(13,831,500

)

 

 

(4,786,750

)

Proceeds from (payments on) settlement of derivative instruments

 

 

(41,616

)

 

 

18,118

 

 

 

1,295

 

Prepaid finance ground lease

 

 

(34,734

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

 

3,116

 

 

 

3,879

 

 

 

3,744

 

Proceeds from exercise of options

 

 

77,785

 

 

 

30,655

 

 

 

31,596

 

Payment of offering costs

 

 

(991

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(51

)

Other financing activities, net

 

 

(80

)

 

 

(78

)

 

 

(63

)

Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

 

Contributions – Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

7,337

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

125

 

Contributions – Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares

 

 

(831,111

)

 

 

(782,122

)

 

 

(739,375

)

Preferred Shares

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,863

)

 

 

(3,091

)

Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership

 

 

(29,615

)

 

 

(28,226

)

 

 

(27,291

)

Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(7,078

)

 

 

(9,753

)

 

 

(8,286

)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

 

 

(684,474

)

 

 

(963,910

)

 

 

(789,818

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits

 

 

686

 

 

 

15,551

 

 

 

(118,326

)

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits, beginning of year

 

 

116,313

 

 

 

100,762

 

 

 

219,088

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits, end of year

 

$

116,999

 

 

$

116,313

 

 

$

100,762

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits, end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

45,753

 

 

$

47,442

 

 

$

50,647

 

Restricted deposits

 

 

71,246

 

 

 

68,871

 

 

 

50,115

 

Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits, end of year

 

$

116,999

 

 

$

116,313

 

 

$

100,762

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:  
  
  
Debt financing costs $(13,305) $(6,425) $(10,982)
Mortgage deposits (8,497) (8,588) (7,699)
Mortgage notes payable, net:  
  
  
Lump sum payoffs (583,122) (359,244) (88,788)
Scheduled principal repayments (8,544) (9,275) (11,869)
Notes, net:  
  
  
Proceeds 496,705
 746,391
 1,194,277
Lump sum payoffs (1,500,000) (300,000) (1,250,000)
Line of credit and commercial paper:  
  
  
Line of credit proceeds 426,000
 3,770,000
 7,167,000
Line of credit repayments (426,000) (4,103,000) (6,949,000)
Commercial paper proceeds 1,759,586
 3,931,227
 
Commercial paper repayments (2,127,472) (3,545,028) 
(Payments on) settlement of derivative instruments (4,662) (13,938) (758)
Proceeds from Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 3,686
 4,404
 3,392
Proceeds from exercise of options 35,833
 59,508
 82,573
Common Shares repurchased and retired 
 
 (1,777)
Redemption of Preferred Shares 
 (12,720) 
Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares 
 (3,486) 
Payment of offering costs (314) (79) (41)
Other financing activities, net (49) (49) (49)
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 
 
 (5,501)
Contributions – Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 
 
 5,684
Contributions – Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership 1
 3
 3
Distributions:  
  
  
Common Shares (4,771,725) (784,748) (776,659)
Preferred Shares (2,318) (3,357) (4,145)
Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership (188,115) (30,869) (30,744)
Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties (36,219) (6,559) (7,778)
Net cash (used for) financing activities (6,948,531) (675,832) (692,861)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 34,931
 2,196
 (13,454)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 42,276
 40,080
 53,534
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $77,207
 $42,276
 $40,080










See accompanying notes

F-10

F-11



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

342,048

 

 

$

358,156

 

 

$

360,273

 

Net cash paid (received) for income and other taxes

 

$

(585

)

 

$

853

 

 

$

640

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate, net

 

$

(120

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other assets

 

$

2,987

 

 

$

2,412

 

 

$

2,412

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

3,934

 

 

$

4,792

 

 

$

2,493

 

Notes, net

 

$

4,869

 

 

$

4,106

 

 

$

3,621

 

Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

8,618

 

 

$

20,144

 

 

$

1,172

 

Notes, net

 

$

3,162

 

 

$

2,637

 

 

$

2,364

 

Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

$

(12

)

 

$

(12

)

 

$

(11

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

21,188

 

 

$

18,452

 

 

$

18,858

 

Write-off of pursuit costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate, net

 

$

5,451

 

 

$

4,364

 

 

$

2,965

 

Other assets

 

$

62

 

 

$

53

 

 

$

17

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

$

16

 

 

$

33

 

 

$

124

 

(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

$

(67,268

)

 

$

2,304

 

 

$

1,955

 

Other liabilities

 

$

1,323

 

 

$

1,363

 

 

$

1,415

 

Realized/unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

2,002

 

 

$

(14,977

)

 

$

(4,582

)

Notes, net

 

$

2,277

 

 

$

(680

)

 

$

(3,454

)

Other liabilities

 

$

29,486

 

 

$

10,533

 

 

$

1,597

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

(33,765

)

 

$

5,174

 

 

$

6,439

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

$

(7,504

)

 

$

(4,891

)

 

$

(3,034

)

Other liabilities

 

$

(2,100

)

 

$

(1,680

)

 

$

(3,000

)

Debt financing costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

(6,909

)

 

$

(145

)

 

$

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

(2,354

)

 

$

(555

)

 

$

 

Notes, net

 

$

(10,549

)

 

$

(7,883

)

 

$

(6,289

)

Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities initial measurement and reclassifications:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Right-of-use assets

 

$

(489,517

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other assets

 

$

184,116

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Lease liabilities

 

$

333,603

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other liabilities

 

$

(28,202

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

Proceeds from (payments on) settlement of derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

 

 

$

18,118

 

 

$

1,295

 

Other liabilities

 

$

(41,616

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:  
  
  
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $482,152
 $436,748
 $443,125
Net cash paid for income and other taxes $1,494
 $1,264
 $1,517
Real estate acquisitions/dispositions/other:  
  
  
Mortgage loans assumed $43,400
 $
 $28,910
Amortization of deferred financing costs:  
  
  
Other assets $3,366
 $3,054
 $3,054
Mortgage notes payable, net $3,978
 $3,589
 $3,075
Notes, net $5,289
 $4,158
 $4,959
Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt:  
  
  
Mortgage notes payable $(21,158) $(13,126) $(15,904)
Notes, net $3,172
 $2,557
 $2,384
Line of credit and commercial paper $608
 $1,077
 $
Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments:  
  
  
Other liabilities $(78) $(169) $(534)
Accumulated other comprehensive income $41,758
 $18,244
 $16,868
Write-off of pursuit costs:      
Investment in real estate, net $3,586
 $2,804
 $2,541
Deposits – restricted $
 $330
 $
Other assets $402
 $74
 $1,066
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $104
 $
 $
(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities:      
Investments in unconsolidated entities $(6,327) $(17,340) $4,610
Other liabilities $1,526
 $2,315
 $3,342
Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return on capital:      
Investments in unconsolidated entities $2,863
 $4,606
 $5,360
Other liabilities $
 $135
 $210
Realized/unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments:  
  
  
Other assets $1,798
 $(3,573) $10,160
Notes, net $(1,798) $2,058
 $1,597
Other liabilities $3,989
 $2,351
 $21,489
Accumulated other comprehensive income $(3,915) $2,219
 $(33,306)
Interest capitalized for real estate and unconsolidated entities under development:      
Investment in real estate, net $(51,451) $(59,885) $(52,717)
Investments in unconsolidated entities $
 $
 $(65)
Investments in unconsolidated entities:      
Investments in unconsolidated entities $(2,326) $(1,404) $(6,318)
Other liabilities $(2,940) $(21,615) $(9,450)

See accompanying notes

F-11

F-12



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (continued):      
Distributions from unconsolidated entities - return of capital:      
Investments in unconsolidated entities $14,014
 $51,144
 $103,793
Other assets $(216) $
 $
Consolidation of previously unconsolidated properties:      
Investment in real estate, net $
 $
 $(64,319)
Investments in unconsolidated entities $
 $
 $(847)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $
 $
 $1,987
Other liabilities $
 $
 $18,383
Debt financing costs:      
Other assets $(8,553) $
 $
Mortgage notes payable, net $(507) $(35) $(448)
Notes, net $(4,245) $(6,390) $(10,534)
(Payments on) settlement of derivative instruments:  
  
  
Other assets $
 $1,848
 $6,623
Other liabilities $(4,662) $(15,786) $(7,381)
Other:  
  
  
Foreign currency translation adjustments $(264) $327
 $552


See accompanying notes
F-12



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PREFERRED SHARES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

COMMON SHARES, $0.01 PAR VALUE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

3,694

 

 

$

3,680

 

 

$

3,659

 

Conversion of OP Units into Common Shares

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

11

 

Exercise of share options

 

 

17

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

8

 

Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Share-based employee compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted shares

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

3,717

 

 

$

3,694

 

 

$

3,680

 

PAID IN CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

8,935,453

 

 

$

8,886,586

 

 

$

8,758,422

 

Common Share Issuance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of OP Units into Common Shares

 

 

10,407

 

 

 

4,097

 

 

 

15,889

 

Exercise of share options

 

 

77,768

 

 

 

30,644

 

 

 

31,588

 

Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

 

3,115

 

 

 

3,878

 

 

 

3,743

 

Share-based employee compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted shares

 

 

12,436

 

 

 

8,257

 

 

 

9,776

 

Share options

 

 

2,675

 

 

 

9,734

 

 

 

6,835

 

ESPP discount

 

 

642

 

 

 

767

 

 

 

747

 

Offering costs

 

 

(991

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(51

)

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)

 

 

(1,675

)

 

 

(454

)

 

 

(594

)

Change in market value of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests –

   Operating Partnership

 

 

(82,283

)

 

 

(13,922

)

 

 

41,916

 

Adjustment for Noncontrolling Interests ownership in Operating

   Partnership

 

 

8,030

 

 

 

5,893

 

 

 

18,315

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

8,965,577

 

 

$

8,935,453

 

 

$

8,886,586

 

RETAINED EARNINGS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

1,261,763

 

 

$

1,403,530

 

 

$

1,543,626

 

Net income attributable to controlling interests

 

 

970,377

 

 

 

657,535

 

 

 

603,454

 

Common Share distributions

 

 

(842,555

)

 

 

(796,212

)

 

 

(740,459

)

Preferred Share distributions

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,091

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

1,386,495

 

 

$

1,261,763

 

 

$

1,403,530

 

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

(64,986

)

 

$

(88,612

)

 

$

(113,909

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year

 

 

(33,765

)

 

 

5,174

 

 

 

6,439

 

Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income

 

 

21,188

 

 

 

18,452

 

 

 

18,858

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

(77,563

)

 

$

(64,986

)

 

$

(88,612

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISTRIBUTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding

 

$

2.27

 

 

$

2.16

 

 

$

2.015

 


  Year Ended December 31,
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 2016 2015 2014
       
PREFERRED SHARES  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $37,280
 $50,000
 $50,000
Partial redemption of 8.29% Series K Cumulative Redeemable 
 (12,720) 
Balance, end of year $37,280
 $37,280
 $50,000
       
COMMON SHARES, $0.01 PAR VALUE  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $3,648
 $3,629
 $3,605
Conversion of OP Units into Common Shares 1
 2
 1
Exercise of share options 8
 14
 21
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 1
 1
 
Share-based employee compensation expense:  
  
  
Restricted shares 1
 2
 2
Balance, end of year $3,659
 $3,648
 $3,629
       
PAID IN CAPITAL  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $8,572,365
 $8,536,340
 $8,561,500
Common Share Issuance:  
  
  
Conversion of OP Units into Common Shares 3,725
 4,964
 2,364
Exercise of share options 35,825
 59,494
 82,552
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 3,685
 4,403
 3,392
Conversion of restricted shares to restricted units 
 (70) 
Share-based employee compensation expense:  
  
  
Restricted shares 15,015
 15,064
 9,902
Share options 3,432
 3,756
 7,349
ESPP discount 650
 884
 859
Common Shares repurchased and retired 
 
 (1,777)
Offering costs (314) (79) (41)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) 748
 1,380
 7,374
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 
 
 (2,308)
Change in market value of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating
Partnership
 115,093
 (64,378) (139,818)
Adjustment for Noncontrolling Interests ownership in Operating Partnership 8,198
 10,607
 4,992
Balance, end of year $8,758,422
 $8,572,365
 $8,536,340
       
RETAINED EARNINGS  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $2,009,091
 $1,950,639
 $2,047,258
Net income attributable to controlling interests 4,292,163
 870,120
 631,308
Common Share distributions (4,754,537) (804,825) (723,782)
Preferred Share distributions (3,091) (3,357) (4,145)
Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares – cash charge 
 (3,486) 
Balance, end of year $1,543,626
 $2,009,091
 $1,950,639



See accompanying notes

F-13




EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING PARTNERSHIP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

228,738

 

 

$

226,691

 

 

$

221,297

 

Issuance of restricted units to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Conversion of OP Units held by Noncontrolling Interests into OP Units

   held by General Partner

 

 

(10,410

)

 

 

(4,098

)

 

 

(15,900

)

Equity compensation associated with Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

13,410

 

 

 

14,009

 

 

 

10,523

 

Net income attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

36,034

 

 

 

24,939

 

 

 

22,604

 

Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

(29,896

)

 

 

(28,682

)

 

 

(26,739

)

Change in carrying value of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests –

   Operating Partnership

 

 

(2,011

)

 

 

1,771

 

 

 

33,221

 

Adjustment for Noncontrolling Interests ownership in Operating

   Partnership

 

 

(8,030

)

 

 

(5,893

)

 

 

(18,315

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

227,837

 

 

$

228,738

 

 

$

226,691

 

PARTIALLY OWNED PROPERTIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

(2,293

)

 

$

4,708

 

 

$

10,609

 

Net income attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

3,297

 

 

 

2,718

 

 

 

2,323

 

Acquisitions of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

 

Contributions by Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

7,337

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

125

 

Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

(7,158

)

 

 

(9,831

)

 

 

(8,349

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

1,183

 

 

$

(2,293

)

 

$

4,708

 

  Year Ended December 31,
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued) 2016 2015 2014
       
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $(152,016) $(172,152) $(155,162)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative instruments:  
  
  
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the year (3,915) 2,219
 (33,306)
Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income 41,758
 18,244
 16,868
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) – foreign currency:      
Currency translation adjustments arising during the year 264
 (327) (552)
Balance, end of year $(113,909) $(152,016) $(172,152)
       
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS  
  
  
       
OPERATING PARTNERSHIP  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $221,379
 $214,411
 $211,412
Issuance of restricted units to Noncontrolling Interests 1
 3
��3
Conversion of OP Units held by Noncontrolling Interests into OP Units held
by General Partner
 (3,726) (4,966) (2,365)
Conversion of restricted shares to restricted units 
 70
 
Equity compensation associated with Noncontrolling Interests 18,180
 21,503
 11,969
Net income attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 171,511
 34,241
 24,831
Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests (187,448) (31,604) (28,676)
Change in carrying value of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating
Partnership
 9,598
 (1,672) 2,229
Adjustment for Noncontrolling Interests ownership in Operating Partnership (8,198) (10,607) (4,992)
Balance, end of year $221,297
 $221,379
 $214,411
       
PARTIALLY OWNED PROPERTIES  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $4,608
 $124,909
 $126,583
Net income attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 16,430
 3,657
 2,544
Contributions by Noncontrolling Interests 
 
 5,684
Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests (36,268) (6,608) (7,827)
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 
 
 (2,244)
Deconsolidation of previously consolidated Noncontrolling Interests 
 (117,350) 
Other 25,839
 
 169
Balance, end of year $10,609
 $4,608
 $124,909

See accompanying notes

F-14




ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

$

5,936,188

 

 

$

5,875,803

 

Depreciable property

 

 

21,319,101

 

 

 

20,435,901

 

Projects under development

 

 

181,630

 

 

 

109,409

 

Land held for development

 

 

96,688

 

 

 

89,909

 

Investment in real estate

 

 

27,533,607

 

 

 

26,511,022

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(7,276,786

)

 

 

(6,696,281

)

Investment in real estate, net

 

 

20,256,821

 

 

 

19,814,741

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

 

52,238

 

 

 

58,349

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

45,753

 

 

 

47,442

 

Restricted deposits

 

 

71,246

 

 

 

68,871

 

Right-of-use assets

 

 

512,774

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

233,937

 

 

 

404,806

 

Total assets

 

$

21,172,769

 

 

$

20,394,209

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

1,941,610

 

 

$

2,385,470

 

Notes, net

 

 

6,077,513

 

 

 

5,933,286

 

Line of credit and commercial paper

 

 

1,017,833

 

 

 

499,183

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

94,350

 

 

 

102,471

 

Accrued interest payable

 

 

66,852

 

 

 

62,622

 

Lease liabilities

 

 

331,334

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

346,963

 

 

 

358,563

 

Security deposits

 

 

70,062

 

 

 

67,258

 

Distributions payable

 

 

218,326

 

 

 

206,601

 

Total liabilities

 

 

10,164,843

 

 

 

9,615,454

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable Limited Partners

 

 

463,400

 

 

 

379,106

 

Capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preference Units

 

 

37,280

 

 

 

37,280

 

General Partner

 

 

10,355,789

 

 

 

10,200,910

 

Limited Partners

 

 

227,837

 

 

 

228,738

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(77,563

)

 

 

(64,986

)

Total partners’ capital

 

 

10,543,343

 

 

 

10,401,942

 

Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

1,183

 

 

 

(2,293

)

Total capital

 

 

10,544,526

 

 

 

10,399,649

 

Total liabilities and capital

 

$

21,172,769

 

 

$

20,394,209

 


  December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
ASSETS    
Investment in real estate  
  
Land $5,899,862
 $5,864,046
Depreciable property 18,730,579
 18,037,087
Projects under development 637,168
 1,122,376
Land held for development 118,816
 158,843
Investment in real estate 25,386,425
 25,182,352
Accumulated depreciation (5,360,389) (4,905,406)
Investment in real estate, net 20,026,036
 20,276,946
Real estate held for sale 
 2,181,135
Cash and cash equivalents 77,207
 42,276
Investments in unconsolidated entities 60,141
 68,101
Deposits – restricted 76,946
 55,893
Escrow deposits – mortgage 64,935
 56,946
Other assets 398,883
 428,899
Total assets $20,704,148
 $23,110,196
     
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL    
Liabilities:  
  
Mortgage notes payable, net $4,119,181
 $4,685,134
Notes, net 4,848,079
 5,848,956
Line of credit and commercial paper 19,998
 387,276
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 147,482
 187,124
Accrued interest payable 60,946
 85,221
Other liabilities 350,466
 366,387
Security deposits 62,624
 77,582
Distributions payable 192,296
 209,378
Total liabilities 9,801,072
 11,847,058
     
Commitments and contingencies 

 

     
Redeemable Limited Partners 442,092
 566,783
Capital:  
  
Partners' Capital:  
  
Preference Units 37,280
 37,280
General Partner 10,305,707
 10,585,104
Limited Partners 221,297
 221,379
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) (113,909) (152,016)
Total partners' capital 10,450,375
 10,691,747
Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 10,609
 4,608
Total capital 10,460,984
 10,696,355
Total liabilities and capital $20,704,148
 $23,110,196


See accompanying notes

F-15




ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Amounts in thousands except per Unit data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

2,700,691

 

 

$

2,577,681

 

 

$

2,470,689

 

Fee and asset management

 

 

384

 

 

 

753

 

 

 

717

 

Total revenues

 

 

2,701,075

 

 

 

2,578,434

 

 

 

2,471,406

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and maintenance

 

 

446,845

 

 

 

429,335

 

 

 

405,281

 

Real estate taxes and insurance

 

 

366,139

 

 

 

357,814

 

 

 

335,495

 

Property management

 

 

95,344

 

 

 

92,485

 

 

 

85,493

 

General and administrative

 

 

52,757

 

 

 

53,813

 

 

 

52,224

 

Depreciation

 

 

831,083

 

 

 

785,725

 

 

 

743,749

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,792,168

 

 

 

1,719,172

 

 

 

1,622,242

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain (loss) on sales of real estate properties

 

 

447,637

 

 

 

256,810

 

 

 

157,057

 

Impairment

 

 

 

 

 

(702

)

 

 

(1,693

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

 

1,356,544

 

 

 

1,115,370

 

 

 

1,004,528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income

 

 

2,817

 

 

 

15,317

 

 

 

6,136

 

Other expenses

 

 

(18,177

)

 

 

(17,267

)

 

 

(5,186

)

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense incurred, net

 

 

(390,076

)

 

 

(413,360

)

 

 

(383,890

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

(11,670

)

 

 

(11,310

)

 

 

(8,526

)

Income before income and other taxes, income (loss) from investments in

   unconsolidated entities and net gain (loss) on sales of land parcels

 

 

939,438

 

 

 

688,750

 

 

 

613,062

 

Income and other tax (expense) benefit

 

 

2,281

 

 

 

(878

)

 

 

(478

)

Income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities

 

 

65,945

 

 

 

(3,667

)

 

 

(3,370

)

Net gain (loss) on sales of land parcels

 

 

2,044

 

 

 

987

 

 

 

19,167

 

Net income

 

 

1,009,708

 

 

 

685,192

 

 

 

628,381

 

Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests - Partially Owned

   Properties

 

 

(3,297

)

 

 

(2,718

)

 

 

(2,323

)

Net income attributable to controlling interests

 

$

1,006,411

 

 

$

682,474

 

 

$

626,058

 

ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preference Units

 

$

3,090

 

 

$

3,090

 

 

$

3,091

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Partner

 

$

967,287

 

 

$

654,445

 

 

$

600,363

 

Limited Partners

 

 

36,034

 

 

 

24,939

 

 

 

22,604

 

Net income available to Units

 

$

1,003,321

 

 

$

679,384

 

 

$

622,967

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per Unit – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Units

 

$

2.61

 

 

$

1.78

 

 

$

1.64

 

Weighted average Units outstanding

 

 

383,368

 

 

 

380,921

 

 

 

379,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per Unit – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Units

 

$

2.60

 

 

$

1.77

 

 

$

1.63

 

Weighted average Units outstanding

 

 

386,333

 

 

 

383,695

 

 

 

382,678

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
REVENUES  
    
Rental income $2,422,233
 $2,736,578
 $2,605,311
Fee and asset management 3,567
 8,387
 9,437
Total revenues 2,425,800
 2,744,965
 2,614,748
       
EXPENSES  
  
  
Property and maintenance 406,823
 479,160
 473,098
Real estate taxes and insurance 317,387
 339,802
 325,401
Property management 82,015
 86,206
 85,065
General and administrative 57,840
 64,664
 50,679
Depreciation 705,649
 765,895
 758,861
Total expenses 1,569,714
 1,735,727
 1,693,104
       
Operating income 856,086
 1,009,238
 921,644
Interest and other income 65,773
 7,372
 4,462
Other expenses (10,368) (2,942) (9,073)
Interest:  
  
  
Expense incurred, net (482,246) (444,487) (457,460)
Amortization of deferred financing costs (12,633) (10,801) (11,088)
Income before income and other taxes, income (loss) from investments
in unconsolidated entities, net gain (loss) on sales of real estate properties
and land parcels and discontinued operations
 416,612
 558,380
 448,485
Income and other tax (expense) benefit (1,613) (917) (1,394)
Income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities 4,801
 15,025
 (7,952)
Net gain on sales of real estate properties 4,044,055
 335,134
 212,685
Net gain (loss) on sales of land parcels 15,731
 (1) 5,277
Income from continuing operations 4,479,586
 907,621
 657,101
Discontinued operations, net 518
 397
 1,582
Net income 4,480,104
 908,018
 658,683
Net (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Partially
Owned Properties
 (16,430) (3,657) (2,544)
Net income attributable to controlling interests $4,463,674
 $904,361
 $656,139
ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME:      
Preference Units $3,091
 $3,357
 $4,145
Premium on redemption of Preference Units $
 $3,486
 $
       
General Partner $4,289,072
 $863,277
 $627,163
Limited Partners 171,511
 34,241
 24,831
Net income available to Units $4,460,583
 $897,518
 $651,994
       
Earnings per Unit – basic:  
  
  
Income from continuing operations available to Units $11.75
 $2.37
 $1.73
Net income available to Units $11.75
 $2.37
 $1.74
Weighted average Units outstanding 378,829
 377,074
 374,899
       
Earnings per Unit – diluted:  
  
  
Income from continuing operations available to Units $11.68
 $2.36
 $1.72
Net income available to Units $11.68
 $2.36
 $1.73
Weighted average Units outstanding 381,992
 380,620
 377,735
       
Distributions declared per Unit outstanding $13.015
 $2.21
 $2.00


See accompanying notes

F-16




ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands except per Unit data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year

 

 

(33,765

)

 

 

5,174

 

 

 

6,439

 

Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive

   income

 

 

21,188

 

 

 

18,452

 

 

 

18,858

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(12,577

)

 

 

23,626

 

 

 

25,297

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

997,131

 

 

 

708,818

 

 

 

653,678

 

Comprehensive (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests –

   Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(3,297

)

 

 

(2,718

)

 

 

(2,323

)

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interests

 

$

993,834

 

 

$

706,100

 

 

$

651,355

 


  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Comprehensive income:  
  
  
Net income $4,480,104
 $908,018
 $658,683
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative instruments:  
  
  
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the year (3,915) 2,219
 (33,306)
Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income 41,758
 18,244
 16,868
Other comprehensive income (loss) – foreign currency:      
Currency translation adjustments arising during the year 264
 (327) (552)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 38,107
 20,136
 (16,990)
Comprehensive income 4,518,211
 928,154
 641,693
Comprehensive (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests –
Partially Owned Properties
 (16,430) (3,657) (2,544)
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interests $4,501,781
 $924,497
 $639,149




See accompanying notes

F-17




ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

831,083

 

 

 

785,725

 

 

 

743,749

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

11,670

 

 

 

11,310

 

 

 

8,526

 

Amortization of above/below market lease intangibles

 

 

(71

)

 

 

4,392

 

 

 

3,828

 

Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt

 

 

11,780

 

 

 

22,781

 

 

 

3,536

 

Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments

 

 

21,176

 

 

 

18,440

 

 

 

18,847

 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

 

 

11,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment

 

 

 

 

 

702

 

 

 

1,693

 

Write-off of pursuit costs

 

 

5,529

 

 

 

4,450

 

 

 

3,106

 

(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities

 

 

(65,945

)

 

 

3,667

 

 

 

3,370

 

Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return on capital

 

 

2,621

 

 

 

2,492

 

 

 

2,632

 

Net (gain) loss on sales of real estate properties

 

 

(447,637

)

 

 

(256,810

)

 

 

(157,057

)

Net (gain) loss on sales of land parcels

 

 

(2,044

)

 

 

(987

)

 

 

(19,167

)

Net (gain) loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

13,647

 

 

 

22,110

 

 

 

12,258

 

Realized/unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

Compensation paid with Company Common Shares

 

 

24,449

 

 

 

27,132

 

 

 

24,997

 

Other operating activities, net

 

 

(287

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in other assets

 

 

6,278

 

 

 

4,097

 

 

 

(449

)

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

5,116

 

 

 

(1,862

)

 

 

11,532

 

Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable

 

 

4,230

 

 

 

4,587

 

 

 

(2,911

)

Increase (decrease) in lease liabilities

 

 

(2,269

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

 

 

13,382

 

 

 

16,578

 

 

 

(23,468

)

Increase (decrease) in security deposits

 

 

2,804

 

 

 

2,249

 

 

 

2,385

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

1,456,984

 

 

 

1,356,295

 

 

 

1,265,788

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate – acquisitions

 

 

(1,518,878

)

 

 

(708,092

)

 

 

(466,394

)

Investment in real estate – development/other

 

 

(195,692

)

 

 

(154,431

)

 

 

(276,382

)

Capital expenditures to real estate

 

 

(178,423

)

 

 

(188,501

)

 

 

(202,607

)

Non-real estate capital additions

 

 

(4,955

)

 

 

(4,505

)

 

 

(1,506

)

Interest capitalized for real estate under development

 

 

(6,884

)

 

 

(6,260

)

 

 

(26,290

)

Proceeds from disposition of real estate, net

 

 

1,064,619

 

 

 

691,526

 

 

 

384,583

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

 

(9,604

)

 

 

(6,571

)

 

 

(6,034

)

Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return of capital

 

 

78,262

 

 

 

 

 

 

334

 

Purchase of investment securities and other investments

 

 

(269

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities

 

 

(771,824

)

 

 

(376,834

)

 

 

(594,296

)


  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:  
  
  
Net income $4,480,104
 $908,018
 $658,683
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
  
  
Depreciation 705,649
 765,895
 758,861
Amortization of deferred financing costs 12,633
 10,801
 11,088
Amortization of above/below market leases 3,426
 3,382
 3,222
Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt (17,378) (9,492) (13,520)
Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments 41,680
 18,075
 16,334
Write-off of pursuit costs 4,092
 3,208
 3,607
(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities (4,801) (15,025) 7,952
Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return on capital 2,863
 4,741
 5,570
Net (gain) on sales of investment securities and other investments (58,409) (526) (57)
Net (gain) on sales of real estate properties (4,044,055) (335,134) (212,685)
Net (gain) loss on sales of land parcels (15,731) 1
 (5,277)
Net (gain) on sales of discontinued operations (43) 
 (179)
Realized/unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments 74
 3,055
 (60)
Compensation paid with Company Common Shares 30,530
 34,607
 27,543
Changes in assets and liabilities:  
  
  
Decrease (increase) in deposits – restricted 11,450
 (1,794) (1,740)
(Increase) decrease in mortgage deposits (26) 258
 1,452
Decrease (increase) in other assets 31,147
 (41,803) 21,773
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses (6,061) (1,667) 17,797
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable (24,275) (4,319) 11,231
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities (26,422) 12,269
 8,437
(Decrease) increase in security deposits (14,958) 1,949
 4,041
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,111,489
 1,356,499
 1,324,073
       
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:  
  
  
Investment in real estate – acquisitions (205,880) (331,336) (469,989)
Investment in real estate – development/other (566,825) (653,897) (530,387)
Capital expenditures to real estate (172,177) (182,113) (185,957)
Non-real estate capital additions (5,731) (3,991) (5,286)
Interest capitalized for real estate and unconsolidated entities under development (51,451) (59,885) (52,782)
Proceeds from disposition of real estate, net 6,824,659
 504,748
 522,647
Investments in unconsolidated entities (5,266) (23,019) (15,768)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return of capital 13,798
 51,144
 103,793
Proceeds from sale of investment securities and other investments 72,815
 2,535
 57
(Increase) decrease in deposits on real estate acquisitions and investments, net (32,503) 17,874
 33,004
Decrease (increase) in mortgage deposits 534
 (531) 798
Consolidation of previously unconsolidated properties 
 
 (44,796)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities 5,871,973
 (678,471) (644,666)








See accompanying notes

F-18




ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt financing costs

 

$

(19,812

)

 

$

(8,583

)

 

$

(6,289

)

Mortgage notes payable, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

295,771

 

 

 

96,935

 

 

 

 

Lump sum payoffs

 

 

(743,021

)

 

 

(1,347,939

)

 

 

(493,420

)

Scheduled principal repayments

 

 

(6,808

)

 

 

(6,629

)

 

 

(10,704

)

Net gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

 

 

(3,381

)

 

 

(22,110

)

 

 

(12,258

)

Notes, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

1,194,468

 

 

 

896,294

 

 

 

692,466

 

Lump sum payoffs

 

 

(1,050,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

(497,975

)

Net gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

 

 

(10,266

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Line of credit and commercial paper:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Line of credit proceeds

 

 

6,010,000

 

 

 

3,805,000

 

 

 

1,845,000

 

Line of credit repayments

 

 

(5,990,000

)

 

 

(3,805,000

)

 

 

(1,845,000

)

Commercial paper proceeds

 

 

15,944,800

 

 

 

14,030,926

 

 

 

5,066,509

 

Commercial paper repayments

 

 

(15,446,150

)

 

 

(13,831,500

)

 

 

(4,786,750

)

Proceeds from (payments on) settlement of derivative instruments

 

 

(41,616

)

 

 

18,118

 

 

 

1,295

 

Prepaid finance ground lease

 

 

(34,734

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from EQR’s Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

 

3,116

 

 

 

3,879

 

 

 

3,744

 

Proceeds from exercise of EQR options

 

 

77,785

 

 

 

30,655

 

 

 

31,596

 

Payment of offering costs

 

 

(991

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(51

)

Other financing activities, net

 

 

(80

)

 

 

(78

)

 

 

(63

)

Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

 

Contributions – Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

7,337

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

125

 

Contributions – Limited Partners

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OP Units – General Partner

 

 

(831,111

)

 

 

(782,122

)

 

 

(739,375

)

Preference Units

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,863

)

 

 

(3,091

)

OP Units – Limited Partners

 

 

(29,615

)

 

 

(28,226

)

 

 

(27,291

)

Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(7,078

)

 

 

(9,753

)

 

 

(8,286

)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

 

 

(684,474

)

 

 

(963,910

)

 

 

(789,818

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits

 

 

686

 

 

 

15,551

 

 

 

(118,326

)

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits, beginning of year

 

 

116,313

 

 

 

100,762

 

 

 

219,088

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits, end of year

 

$

116,999

 

 

$

116,313

 

 

$

100,762

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits, end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

45,753

 

 

$

47,442

 

 

$

50,647

 

Restricted deposits

 

 

71,246

 

 

 

68,871

 

 

 

50,115

 

Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted deposits, end of year

 

$

116,999

 

 

$

116,313

 

 

$

100,762

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:  
  
  
Debt financing costs $(13,305) $(6,425) $(10,982)
Mortgage deposits (8,497) (8,588) (7,699)
Mortgage notes payable, net:  
  
  
Lump sum payoffs (583,122) (359,244) (88,788)
Scheduled principal repayments (8,544) (9,275) (11,869)
Notes, net:  
  
  
Proceeds 496,705
 746,391
 1,194,277
Lump sum payoffs (1,500,000) (300,000) (1,250,000)
Line of credit and commercial paper:  
  
  
Line of credit proceeds 426,000
 3,770,000
 7,167,000
Line of credit repayments (426,000) (4,103,000) (6,949,000)
Commercial paper proceeds 1,759,586
 3,931,227
 
     Commercial paper repayments (2,127,472) (3,545,028) 
(Payments on) settlement of derivative instruments (4,662) (13,938) (758)
Proceeds from EQR's Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 3,686
 4,404
 3,392
Proceeds from exercise of EQR options 35,833
 59,508
 82,573
OP units repurchased and retired 
 
 (1,777)
Redemption of Preference Units 
 (12,720) 
Premium on redemption of Preference Units 
 (3,486) 
Payment of offering costs (314) (79) (41)
Other financing activities, net (49) (49) (49)
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 
 
 (5,501)
Contributions – Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 
 
 5,684
Contributions – Limited Partners 1
 3
 3
Distributions:  
  
  
OP Units – General Partner (4,771,725) (784,748) (776,659)
Preference Units (2,318) (3,357) (4,145)
OP Units – Limited Partners (188,115) (30,869) (30,744)
Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties (36,219) (6,559) (7,778)
Net cash (used for) financing activities (6,948,531) (675,832) (692,861)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 34,931
 2,196
 (13,454)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 42,276
 40,080
 53,534
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $77,207
 $42,276
 $40,080










See accompanying notes

F-19




ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

342,048

 

 

$

358,156

 

 

$

360,273

 

Net cash paid (received) for income and other taxes

 

$

(585

)

 

$

853

 

 

$

640

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate, net

 

$

(120

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other assets

 

$

2,987

 

 

$

2,412

 

 

$

2,412

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

3,934

 

 

$

4,792

 

 

$

2,493

 

Notes, net

 

$

4,869

 

 

$

4,106

 

 

$

3,621

 

Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

8,618

 

 

$

20,144

 

 

$

1,172

 

Notes, net

 

$

3,162

 

 

$

2,637

 

 

$

2,364

 

Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

$

(12

)

 

$

(12

)

 

$

(11

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

21,188

 

 

$

18,452

 

 

$

18,858

 

Write-off of pursuit costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate, net

 

$

5,451

 

 

$

4,364

 

 

$

2,965

 

Other assets

 

$

62

 

 

$

53

 

 

$

17

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

$

16

 

 

$

33

 

 

$

124

 

(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

$

(67,268

)

 

$

2,304

 

 

$

1,955

 

Other liabilities

 

$

1,323

 

 

$

1,363

 

 

$

1,415

 

Realized/unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

2,002

 

 

$

(14,977

)

 

$

(4,582

)

Notes, net

 

$

2,277

 

 

$

(680

)

 

$

(3,454

)

Other liabilities

 

$

29,486

 

 

$

10,533

 

 

$

1,597

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

(33,765

)

 

$

5,174

 

 

$

6,439

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

$

(7,504

)

 

$

(4,891

)

 

$

(3,034

)

Other liabilities

 

$

(2,100

)

 

$

(1,680

)

 

$

(3,000

)

Debt financing costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

(6,909

)

 

$

(145

)

 

$

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

(2,354

)

 

$

(555

)

 

$

 

Notes, net

 

$

(10,549

)

 

$

(7,883

)

 

$

(6,289

)

Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities initial measurement and reclassifications:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Right-of-use assets

 

$

(489,517

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other assets

 

$

184,116

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Lease liabilities

 

$

333,603

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other liabilities

 

$

(28,202

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

Proceeds from (payments on) settlement of derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

$

 

 

$

18,118

 

 

$

1,295

 

Other liabilities

 

$

(41,616

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:  
  
  
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $482,152
 $436,748
 $443,125
Net cash paid for income and other taxes $1,494
 $1,264
 $1,517
Real estate acquisitions/dispositions/other:  
  
  
Mortgage loans assumed $43,400
 $
 $28,910
Amortization of deferred financing costs:  
  
  
Other assets $3,366
 $3,054
 $3,054
Mortgage notes payable, net $3,978
 $3,589
 $3,075
Notes, net $5,289
 $4,158
 $4,959
Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt:  
  
  
Mortgage notes payable $(21,158) $(13,126) $(15,904)
Notes, net $3,172
 $2,557
 $2,384
Line of credit and commercial paper $608
 $1,077
 $
Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments:  
  
  
Other liabilities $(78) $(169) $(534)
Accumulated other comprehensive income $41,758
 $18,244
 $16,868
Write-off of pursuit costs:      
Investment in real estate, net $3,586
 $2,804
 $2,541
Deposits – restricted $
 $330
 $
Other assets $402
 $74
 $1,066
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $104
 $
 $
(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities:      
Investments in unconsolidated entities $(6,327) $(17,340) $4,610
Other liabilities $1,526
 $2,315
 $3,342
Distributions from unconsolidated entities – return on capital:      
Investments in unconsolidated entities $2,863
 $4,606
 $5,360
Other liabilities $
 $135
 $210
Realized/unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments:  
  
  
Other assets $1,798
 $(3,573) $10,160
Notes, net $(1,798) $2,058
 $1,597
Other liabilities $3,989
 $2,351
 $21,489
Accumulated other comprehensive income $(3,915) $2,219
 $(33,306)
Interest capitalized for real estate and unconsolidated entities under development:      
Investment in real estate, net $(51,451) $(59,885) $(52,717)
Investments in unconsolidated entities $
 $
 $(65)
Investments in unconsolidated entities:      
Investments in unconsolidated entities $(2,326) $(1,404) $(6,318)
Other liabilities $(2,940) $(21,615) $(9,450)

See accompanying notes

F-20




ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Amounts in thousands)
  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (continued):      
Distributions from unconsolidated entities - return of capital:      
Investments in unconsolidated entities $14,014
 $51,144
 $103,793
Other assets $(216) $
 $
Consolidation of previously unconsolidated properties:      
Investment in real estate, net $
 $
 $(64,319)
Investments in unconsolidated entities $
 $
 $(847)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $
 $
 $1,987
Other liabilities $
 $
 $18,383
Debt financing costs:      
Other assets $(8,553) $
 $
Mortgage notes payable, net $(507) $(35) $(448)
Notes, net $(4,245) $(6,390) $(10,534)
(Payments on) settlement of derivative instruments:      
Other assets $
 $1,848
 $6,623
Other liabilities $(4,662) $(15,786) $(7,381)
Other:      
Foreign currency translation adjustments $(264) $327
 $552


See accompanying notes
F-21



ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PREFERENCE UNITS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

GENERAL PARTNER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

10,200,910

 

 

$

10,293,796

 

 

$

10,305,707

 

OP Unit Issuance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of OP Units held by Limited Partners into OP Units held

   by General Partner

 

 

10,410

 

 

 

4,098

 

 

 

15,900

 

Exercise of EQR share options

 

 

77,785

 

 

 

30,655

 

 

 

31,596

 

EQR’s Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

 

3,116

 

 

 

3,879

 

 

 

3,744

 

Share-based employee compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQR restricted shares

 

 

12,438

 

 

 

8,258

 

 

 

9,777

 

EQR share options

 

 

2,675

 

 

 

9,734

 

 

 

6,835

 

EQR ESPP discount

 

 

642

 

 

 

767

 

 

 

747

 

Net income available to Units – General Partner

 

 

967,287

 

 

 

654,445

 

 

 

600,363

 

OP Units – General Partner distributions

 

 

(842,555

)

 

 

(796,212

)

 

 

(740,459

)

Offering costs

 

 

(991

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(51

)

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)

 

 

(1,675

)

 

 

(454

)

 

 

(594

)

Change in market value of Redeemable Limited Partners

 

 

(82,283

)

 

 

(13,922

)

 

 

41,916

 

Adjustment for Limited Partners ownership in Operating Partnership

 

 

8,030

 

 

 

5,893

 

 

 

18,315

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

10,355,789

 

 

$

10,200,910

 

 

$

10,293,796

 

LIMITED PARTNERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

228,738

 

 

$

226,691

 

 

$

221,297

 

Issuance of restricted units to Limited Partners

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Conversion of OP Units held by Limited Partners into OP Units held by

   General Partner

 

 

(10,410

)

 

 

(4,098

)

 

 

(15,900

)

Equity compensation associated with Units – Limited Partners

 

 

13,410

 

 

 

14,009

 

 

 

10,523

 

Net income available to Units – Limited Partners

 

 

36,034

 

 

 

24,939

 

 

 

22,604

 

Units – Limited Partners distributions

 

 

(29,896

)

 

 

(28,682

)

 

 

(26,739

)

Change in carrying value of Redeemable Limited Partners

 

 

(2,011

)

 

 

1,771

 

 

 

33,221

 

Adjustment for Limited Partners ownership in Operating Partnership

 

 

(8,030

)

 

 

(5,893

)

 

 

(18,315

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

227,837

 

 

$

228,738

 

 

$

226,691

 

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

(64,986

)

 

$

(88,612

)

 

$

(113,909

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year

 

 

(33,765

)

 

 

5,174

 

 

 

6,439

 

Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income

 

 

21,188

 

 

 

18,452

 

 

 

18,858

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

(77,563

)

 

$

(64,986

)

 

$

(88,612

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISTRIBUTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions declared per Unit outstanding

 

$

2.27

 

 

$

2.16

 

 

$

2.015

 

  Year Ended December 31,
PARTNERS' CAPITAL 2016 2015 2014
       
PREFERENCE UNITS  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $37,280
 $50,000
 $50,000
Partial redemption of 8.29% Series K Cumulative Redeemable 
 (12,720) 
Balance, end of year $37,280
 $37,280
 $50,000
       
GENERAL PARTNER  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $10,585,104
 $10,490,608
 $10,612,363
OP Unit Issuance:  
  
  
Conversion of OP Units held by Limited Partners into OP Units held by
General Partner
 3,726
 4,966
 2,365
Exercise of EQR share options 35,833
 59,508
 82,573
EQR's Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 3,686
 4,404
 3,392
Conversion of EQR restricted shares to restricted units 
 (70) 
Share-based employee compensation expense:  
  
  
EQR restricted shares 15,016
 15,066
 9,904
EQR share options 3,432
 3,756
 7,349
EQR ESPP discount 650
 884
 859
OP Units repurchased and retired 
 
 (1,777)
Net income available to Units – General Partner 4,289,072
 863,277
 627,163
OP Units – General Partner distributions (4,754,537) (804,825) (723,782)
Offering costs (314) (79) (41)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) 748
 1,380
 7,374
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 
 
 (2,308)
Change in market value of Redeemable Limited Partners 115,093
 (64,378) (139,818)
Adjustment for Limited Partners ownership in Operating Partnership 8,198
 10,607
 4,992
Balance, end of year $10,305,707
 $10,585,104
 $10,490,608
       
LIMITED PARTNERS      
Balance, beginning of year $221,379
 $214,411
 $211,412
Issuance of restricted units to Limited Partners 1
 3
 3
Conversion of OP Units held by Limited Partners into OP Units held by
General Partner
 (3,726) (4,966) (2,365)
Conversion of EQR restricted shares to restricted units 
 70
 
Equity compensation associated with Units – Limited Partners 18,180
 21,503
 11,969
Net income available to Units – Limited Partners 171,511
 34,241
 24,831
Units – Limited Partners distributions (187,448) (31,604) (28,676)
Change in carrying value of Redeemable Limited Partners 9,598
 (1,672) 2,229
Adjustment for Limited Partners ownership in Operating Partnership (8,198) (10,607) (4,992)
Balance, end of year $221,297
 $221,379
 $214,411
       
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $(152,016) $(172,152) $(155,162)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative instruments:  
  
  
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the year (3,915) 2,219
 (33,306)
Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income 41,758
 18,244
 16,868
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) – foreign currency:      
Currency translation adjustments arising during the year 264
 (327) (552)
Balance, end of year $(113,909) $(152,016) $(172,152)

See accompanying notes

F-22

F-21



ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS – PARTIALLY OWNED

   PROPERTIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

(2,293

)

 

$

4,708

 

 

$

10,609

 

Net income attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

3,297

 

 

 

2,718

 

 

 

2,323

 

Acquisitions of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

 

Contributions by Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

7,337

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

125

 

Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

(7,158

)

 

 

(9,831

)

 

 

(8,349

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

1,183

 

 

$

(2,293

)

 

$

4,708

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS  
  
  
       
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS – PARTIALLY OWNED PROPERTIES  
  
  
Balance, beginning of year $4,608
 $124,909
 $126,583
Net income attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 16,430
 3,657
 2,544
Contributions by Noncontrolling Interests 
 
 5,684
Distributions to Noncontrolling Interests (36,268) (6,608) (7,827)
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties 
 
 (2,244)
Deconsolidation of previously consolidated Noncontrolling Interests 
 (117,350) 
Other 25,839
 
 169
Balance, end of year $10,609
 $4,608
 $124,909





See accompanying notes

F-23

F-22



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.

1.

Business


Equity Residential (“EQR”), a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993, is an S&P 500 company focused on the acquisition, development and management of rental apartment properties located in urban and high-density suburban coastal gateway markets.communities, a business that is conducted on its behalf by ERP Operating Limited Partnership ("ERPOP"(“ERPOP”),.  EQR is a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993 and ERPOP is an Illinois limited partnership was formed in May 1993 to conduct the multifamily residential property business of Equity Residential. EQR has elected to be taxed as a REIT.1993.  References to the "Company," "we," "us"“Company,” “we,” “us” or "our"“our” mean collectively EQR, ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by EQR and/or ERPOP.  References to the "Operating Partnership"“Operating Partnership” mean collectively ERPOP and those entities/subsidiaries owned or controlled by ERPOP.  Unless otherwise indicated, the notes to consolidated financial statements apply to both the Company and the Operating Partnership.


EQR is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 20162019 owned an approximate 96.2%96.4% ownership interest in, ERPOP.  All of the Company'sCompany’s property ownership, development and related business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and EQR has no material assets or liabilities other than its investment in ERPOP.  EQR issues public equity from time to time, the net proceeds of which it is obligated to contribute to ERPOP, but does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership.  The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Company'sCompany’s ownership interests in its joint ventures.  The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company, directly or indirectly through investments in title holding entities, owned all or a portion of 302309 properties located in 10 states and the District of Columbia consisting of 77,45879,962 apartment units.  The ownership breakdown includes (table does not include various uncompleted development properties):

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment Units

 

Wholly Owned Properties

 

 

291

 

 

 

76,265

 

Master-Leased Property – Consolidated

 

 

1

 

 

 

162

 

Partially Owned Properties – Consolidated

 

 

17

 

 

 

3,535

 

 

 

 

309

 

 

 

79,962

 

  Properties Apartment Units
Wholly Owned Properties 280
 72,445
Master-Leased Properties – Consolidated 3
 853
Partially Owned Properties – Consolidated 17
 3,215
Partially Owned Properties – Unconsolidated 2
 945
  302
 77,458

The “Wholly Owned Properties” are accounted for under the consolidation method of accounting.  The "Master-Leased Properties“Master-Leased PropertyConsolidated" areConsolidated” is wholly owned by the Company but the entire project is leased to a third party corporate housing provider.  These properties areThis property is consolidated and reflected as a real estate assetsasset while the master leases arelease is accounted for as an operating leases.lease.  The “Partially Owned Properties – Consolidated” are controlled by the Company, but have partners with noncontrolling interests and are accounted for under the consolidation method of accounting and qualify as variable interest entities. The “Partially Owned Properties – Unconsolidated” are controlled by the Company's partners but the Company has noncontrolling interests and are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.


The Company maintains long-term ground leases for 13 operating properties. The Company owns the building and improvements and leases the land underlying the improvements under long-term ground leases. The expiration dates for these leases range from 2042 through 2110. These properties are consolidated and reflected as real estate assets while the ground leases are accounted for as operating leases.

2.

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Presentation


Due to the Company’s ability as general partner to control either through ownership or by contract the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, the Operating Partnership and each such subsidiary has been consolidated with the Company for financial reporting purposes, except for twoany unconsolidated operating properties.

properties/entities.

Real Estate Assets and Depreciation of Investment in Real Estate

An acquiring entity

The Company expects that substantially all of its transactions will be accounted for as asset acquisitions.  In an asset acquisition, the Company is required to recognizecapitalize transaction costs and allocate the purchase price on a relative fair value basis.  For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-


F-24
acquisitions were considered asset acquisitions.

F-23



date fair value with limited exceptions. In addition, an acquiring entity is required to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred, value noncontrolling interests at fair value at

For asset acquisitions, the acquisition date and expense restructuring costs associated with an acquired business.


The Company allocates the purchase price of properties tothe net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on theira relative fair values.value basis.  In making estimates of relative fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property, our own analysis of recently acquired and existing comparable properties in our portfolio and other market data.  The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the relative fair value of the tangible and intangible assets/liabilities acquired.  The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired real estate to various components as follows:

Land – Based on actual purchase price adjusted to an allocation of the relative fair value (as necessary) if acquired separately or market research/comparables if acquired with an operating property.


Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment – Ranges between $10,000 and $35,000 per apartment unit acquired as an estimate of the allocation of the relative fair value of the appliances and fixtures inside an apartment unit.  The per-apartment unit amount applied depends on the economic age of the apartment units acquired.  Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of five to ten years.

Land – Based on actual purchase price adjusted to fair value (as necessary) if acquired separately or market research/comparables if acquired with an operating property.

Lease Intangibles – The Company considers the value of acquired in-place leases and above/below market leases and the amortization period is the average remaining term of each respective acquired lease.  In-place residential leases’ average term at acquisition approximates six months.  In-place retail leases’ term at acquisition approximates the average remaining term of all acquired retail leases.  See Note 8 for more information on ground lease intangibles.

Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment – Ranges between $10,000 and $25,000 per apartment unit acquired as an estimate of the fair value of the appliances and fixtures inside an apartment unit. The per-apartment unit amount applied depends on the economic age of the apartment building acquired. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of five to ten years.

Other Intangible Assets – The Company considers whether it has acquired other intangible assets, including any customer relationship intangibles and the amortization period is the estimated useful life of the acquired intangible asset.

Lease Intangibles – The Company considers the value of acquired in-place leases and above/below market leases and the amortization period is the average remaining term of each respective acquired lease. In-place residential leases' average term at acquisition approximates six months. In-place retail leases' term at acquisition approximates the average remaining term of all acquired retail leases. See Note 4 for more information on above and below market leases.

Building – Based on the allocation of the relative fair value determined on an “as-if vacant” basis.  Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of thirty years.

Other Intangible Assets – The Company considers whether it has acquired other intangible assets, including any customer relationship intangibles and the amortization period is the estimated useful life of the acquired intangible asset.

Long-Term Debt – The Company calculates the allocation of the relative fair value by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings.

Building – Based on the fair value determined on an “as-if vacant” basis. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of thirty years.
Site Improvements – Based on replacement cost, which approximates fair value. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of eight years.
Long-Term Debt – The Company calculates the fair value by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings.

Replacements inside an apartment unit such as appliances and carpeting are depreciated over an estimated useful life of five to ten years.  ExpendituresRenovation expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred and significant renovations and improvements that improve and/or extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized over their estimated useful life, generally five to fifteen years.  Initial direct leasing costs are expensed as incurred as such expense approximates the deferral and amortization of initial direct leasing costs over the lease terms.  

Property sales or dispositions are recorded when titlecontrol transfers to unrelated third parties, contingencies have been removed and sufficient cash consideration has been received by the Company.  Upon disposition, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts.  Any gain or loss on sale is recognized in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The Company classifies real estate assets as real estate held for sale when it is probable a property will be disposed of (see below and Note 4 for further discussion).

of.  The Company classifies properties under development and/or expansion and properties in the lease-up phase (including land) as construction-in-progress until construction has been completed and certificates of occupancy permits have been obtained.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, including its investmentsinvestment in real estate, for indicators of impairment.  The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions, and legal, regulatory and environmental concerns, the Company’s intent and ability to hold the related asset, as well as the Company’s ability to hold and its intent with regard to each asset.any significant cost overruns on development properties.  Future events could occur which would cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.  If impairment indicators exist, the Company performs the following:




F-25


For long-lived operating assets to be held and used, the Company compares the expected future undiscounted cash flows for the long-lived asset against the carrying amount of that asset.  If the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company would make an estimate of the fair value for the particular asset and would record an impairment loss for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying amount of the asset.  In determining the future undiscounted cash flows or the estimated fair value of an asset there is judgment in estimating the expected future rental revenues, operating expenses and discount and capitalization rates.

F-24


Table of Contents

For long-lived non-operating assets (projects under development and land held for development), management evaluates major cost overruns, market conditions that could affect lease-up projections, intent and ability to hold the asset and any other indicators of impairment.  If any of the indicators were to suggest impairment was present, the carrying value of the asset would be adjusted accordingly to fair value.  

For long-lived assets to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the estimated fair value of the asset, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the asset measured at the time that the Company has determined it will sell the asset.  Long-lived assets held for sale and the related liabilities are separately reported, with the long-lived assets reported at the lower of their carrying amounts or their estimated fair values, less their costs to sell, and are not depreciated after reclassification to real estate held for sale.


Cost Capitalization

See the Real Estate Assets and Depreciation of Investment in Real Estate section for a discussion of the Company’s policy with respect to capitalization vs. expensing of fixed asset/repair and maintenance costs.  In addition, the Company capitalizes an allocation of the payroll and associated costs of employees directly responsible for and who spend their time on the execution and supervision of major capital and/or renovation projects.  These costs are reflected on the balance sheets as increases to depreciable property.


For all development projects, the Company uses its professional judgment in determining whether such costs meet the criteria for capitalization or must be expensed as incurred.  The Company capitalizes interest, real estate taxes and insurance and payroll and associated costs for those individuals directly responsible for and who spend their time on development activities, with capitalization ceasing no later than 90 days following issuance of the certificate of occupancy.  These costs are reflected on the balance sheets as construction-in-progress for each specific property.  The Company expenses as incurred all payroll costs of on-site employees working directly at our properties, except as noted above on our development properties prior to certificate of occupancy issuance and on specific major renovations at selected properties when additional incremental employees are hired.


During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the Company capitalized $18.7$14.2 million, $22.3$13.2 million and $22.4$14.7 million, respectively, of payroll and associated costs of employees directly responsible for and who spend their time on the execution and supervision of development activities as well as major capital and/or renovation projects.


Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all demand deposits, money market accounts and investments in certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements purchased with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.  The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions.  The combined account balances at one or more institutions typically exceed the Federal DepositoryDeposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage, and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage.  The Company believes that the risk is not significant, as the Company does not anticipate the financial institutions’ non-performance.


Investment Securities
Investment securities are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. These securities are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost if management has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Otherwise, the securities are classified as available-for-sale and carried at estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity/partners' capital. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not hold any investment securities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Including Derivative Instruments

The valuation of financial instruments requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments.  The Company, where possible, bases the fair values of its financial instruments, including its derivative instruments, on listed market prices and third party quotes.  Where these are not available, the Company bases its estimates on current instruments with similar terms and maturities or on other factors relevant to the financial instruments.


In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes.  The Company seeksmay seek to manage these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments.  The Company may also use derivatives to manage commodity prices in the daily operations of the business.


F-26



The Company has a policy of only entering into derivative contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors.  When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivatives are designed to hedge, the Company has not sustained a material loss from these instruments nor does it anticipate any material adverse effect on its net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives it currently has in place.


F-25


Table of Contents

The Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and measures those instruments at fair value.  In addition, fair value adjustments will affect either shareholders’ equity/partners'partners’ capital or net income depending on whether the derivative instruments qualify as a hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the nature of the hedging activity.  When the terms of an underlying transaction are modified, or when the underlying transaction is terminated or completed, all changes in the fair value of the instrument are marked-to-market with changes in value included in net income each period until the instrument matures.  Any derivative instrument used for risk management that does not meet the hedging criteria is marked-to-market each period.  The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.


Leases and Revenue Recognition


Rental income attributable to residential leases is recorded on a straight-line basis, which is not materially different than if it were recorded when due from residents and recognized monthly as it was earned.  Leases entered into between a resident and a property for the rental of an apartment unit are generally year-to-year, renewable upon consent of both parties on an annual or monthly basis.  Rental income attributable to retail/retail leases (including commercial leasesleases) is also recorded on a straight-line basis.  Retail/commercialRetail leases generally have five to ten year lease terms with market based renewal options.  Fee and asset management revenue and interest income are recorded on an accrual basis.

The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from residential, retail and other lease income, which are accounted for under the new leasing standard effective January 1, 2019 (discussed below in Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements).  Our revenue streams have the same timing and pattern of revenue recognition across our reportable segments, with consistent allocations between the leasing and revenue recognition standards.  

The Company is a lessor for its residential and retail leases and is a lessee for its corporate headquarters and regional offices and ground leases for land underlying current operating properties or projects under development.  If applicable, lease agreements must be evaluated to determine the accounting treatment as a finance or operating lease in accordance with the new leasing standard.  A lease is classified as a finance lease if it meets any of the following criteria:  (a) Ownership of the underlying asset is transferred to the lessee by the end of the lease term; (b) the lessee has and is reasonably certain to exercise an option to purchase the underlying asset; (c) the lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset; (d) the present value of future minimum lease payments is equal to substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset; and (e) the underlying asset is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term due to its specialized nature.

The new leasing standard also requires the recognition on the balance sheet of: (a) a liability for the lease obligation (initially measured at the present value of the future lease payments not yet paid over the lease term); and (b) an asset for its right to use the underlying asset (initially equal to the lease liability).  See Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements below for additional details regarding the adoption of this standard.  Rental revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease when reasonably assured they are collectible.  The Company uses estimates and judgments on the incremental borrowing rate used to calculate the present value of the future lease payments.  See Note 8 for additional discussion.

The Company’s revenue streams that are not accounted for under the new leasing standard include:

Parking revenue – The Company’s parking revenue, not related to leasing, is derived primarily from monthly and transient daily parking and is accounted for at the point in time when control of the goods or services transfers to the customer and our performance obligation is satisfied.


Other rental and non-rental related revenue – The Company receives other income, including, but not limited to: (a) ancillary income, such as laundry, renters insurance and cable income; (b) net settlement income or collections; and (c) miscellaneous fee income.

Fee and asset management revenue – The Company received management fee revenue as the property manager for two unconsolidated joint ventures for which it had an ownership interest during part of the year but no longer owns as of December 31, 2019.

Gains or losses on sales of real estate properties – The Company accounts for the sale of real estate properties and any related gain recognition in accordance with the accounting guidance applicable to sales of real estate, which establishes standards for recognition of profit on all real estate sales transactions.  The Company recognizes the sale, and associated gain or loss from the disposition, provided that the earnings process is complete and the Company does not have significant continuing involvement. A gain or loss is recognized when the criteria for an asset to be derecognized are met, which include when a contract exists and the buyer obtained control of the nonfinancial asset that was sold.

F-26


Table of Contents

The Company’s rental income detail by leasing and revenue recognition standards along with the percentages of rental income are disclosed in the table below for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands).

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

Income Type

 

$ Rental Income

 

 

% of Rental Income

 

 

$ Rental Income

 

 

% of Rental Income

 

Residential and retail rent

 

$

2,486,189

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,369,552

 

 

 

 

 

Utility recoveries ("RUBS")

 

 

68,576

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63,218

 

 

 

 

 

Parking rent

 

 

37,905

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,757

 

 

 

 

 

Storage rent

 

 

3,816

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,674

 

 

 

 

 

Pet rent

 

 

11,617

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,185

 

 

 

 

 

Leasing standard (1)

 

 

2,608,103

 

 

 

96.6

%

 

 

2,481,386

 

 

 

96.3

%

Parking revenue

 

 

28,272

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,743

 

 

 

 

 

Other revenue

 

 

64,316

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,552

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue recognition standard

 

 

92,588

 

 

 

3.4

%

 

 

96,295

 

 

 

3.7

%

Rental income

 

$

2,700,691

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

2,577,681

 

 

 

100.0

%

(1)

See Note 8 for additional details on leasing revenue.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company expenses share-based compensation such as restricted shares, restricted units and share options.  Any common share of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share (the "Common Shares"“Common Shares”), issued pursuant to EQR'sEQR’s incentive equity compensation and employee share purchase plans will result in ERPOP issuing units of partnership interest ("(“OP Units"Units”) to EQR on a one-for-one basis, with ERPOP receiving the net cash proceeds of such issuances.  See Note 12 for further discussion.

The fair value of the option grants areis recognized over the requisite service/vesting period of the options.  The fair value for the Company'sCompany’s share options was estimated at the time the share options were granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the primary grant in each year having the following weighted average assumptions:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Expected volatility (1)

 

 

16.3

%

 

 

14.8

%

 

 

15.3

%

Expected life (2)

 

5 years

 

 

5 years

 

 

5 years

 

Expected dividend yield (3)

 

 

3.10

%

 

 

3.09

%

 

 

3.08

%

Risk-free interest rate (4)

 

 

2.43

%

 

 

2.52

%

 

 

1.93

%

Option valuation per share

 

$

8.06

 

 

$

6.15

 

 

$

5.86

 

  2016 2015 2014
Expected volatility (1) 26.3% 26.6% 27.0%
Expected life (2) 5 years 5 years 5 years
Expected dividend yield (3) 3.04% 3.13% 3.78%
Risk-free interest rate (4) 1.27% 1.29% 1.50%
Option valuation per share $13.02 $13.68 $9.12

(1)

(1)

Expected volatility – Estimated based on the historical ten-yearfive-year volatility (the period matching the expected life) of EQR’s share price measured on a monthly basis.

(2)

(2)

Expected life – Approximates the actual weighted average life of all share options granted since the Company went public in 1993.

(3)

(3)

Expected dividend yield – Calculated by averaging the historical annual yield on EQR shares for a period matching the expected life of each grant, with the annual yield calculated by dividing actual regular dividends (excluding any special dividends) by the average price of EQR’s shares in a given year.

(4)

(4)

Risk-free interest rate – The most current U.S. Treasury rate available prior toat the grant date for a period matching the expected life of each grant.


The valuation method and assumptions are the same as those the Company used in accounting for option expense in its consolidated financial statements.  The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable.  This model is only one method of valuing options.  Because the Company’s share options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, the actual value of the options to the recipient may be significantly different.


Income and Other Taxes


Due

EQR has elected to the structure of EQRbe taxed as a REIT andREIT.  This, along with the nature of the operations of its operating properties, resulted in no provision for federal


F-27


income taxes has beenbeing made at the EQR level.  In addition, ERPOP generally is not liable for federal income taxes as the partners recognize their proportionate share of income or loss in their tax returns; therefore no provision for federal income taxes has been made at the ERPOP level.  Historically, the Company has generally only incurred certain state and local income, excise and franchise taxes.  The Company has elected Taxabletaxable REIT Subsidiarysubsidiary (“TRS”) status for certain of its corporate subsidiaries and as a result, these entities will incur both federal and state income taxes on any taxable income of such entities after consideration of any net operating losses.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities applicable to the TRS are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts

F-27


Table of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. These assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates for which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effects of changes in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in earnings in the period enacted. Contents

The Company’s deferred tax assets are generally the result of tax affected suspended interest deductions, net operating losses, differing depreciable lives on capitalized assets and the timing of expense recognition for certain accrued liabilities. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has recorded a deferred tax asset of approximately $38.7 million, which is fully offset by a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of realization. The company currently anticipates electing REIT status in the third quarter of 2017 for its primary TRS, retroactive to January 1, 2016.


The Company providedprovision for income franchise and excise taxes allocatedother tax expense (benefit) was as follows in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

State and local income, franchise and excise tax (benefit)

 

$

963

 

 

$

878

 

 

$

478

 

Alternative minimum tax credit (benefit) (1)

 

 

(3,244

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income and other tax expense (benefit) (2)

 

$

(2,281

)

 

$

878

 

 

$

478

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Income and other tax expense (benefit) (1) $1,613
 $917
 $1,394
Discontinued operations, net (2) 12
 15
 8
Provision for income, franchise and excise taxes (3) $1,625
 $932
 $1,402

(1)

(1)Primarily includes state and local income, excise and franchise taxes.

As provided in recent tax legislation which repealed the alternative minimum tax on corporations, in 2019 the Company claimed/received $1.6 million of refunds of various alternative minimum tax credit carryovers generated in prior tax years.  The provision allows for carryover amounts to be refunded over four years, with 50% available in the first year.  The remaining $1.6 million, which will be claimed over three years, was accrued in 2019, for a total expected benefit of $3.2 million.

(2)

(2)Primarily represents state and local income, excise and franchise taxes on operating properties sold prior to January 1, 2014 and included in discontinued operations. The amounts included in discontinued operations for the years ending December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 represent trailing activity for properties sold in 2013 and prior years. None of the properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 met the new criteria for reporting discontinued operations.
(3)

All provisions for income tax amounts are current and none are deferred.

The Company’s TRSs have approximately $16.4 million of net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards available as of January 1, 2017 that will expire between 2030 and 2032.

During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the Company’s tax treatmentcharacter of the Company’s dividends and distributions were as follows (unaudited):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019 (1)

 

 

2018 (2)

 

 

2017 (3)

 

Tax character of dividends and distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary dividends

 

$

1.39604

 

 

$

1.84454

 

 

$

1.22126

 

Long-term capital gain

 

 

0.61243

 

 

 

0.21423

 

 

 

0.18959

 

Unrecaptured section 1250 gain

 

 

0.23403

 

 

 

0.06498

 

 

 

0.10040

 

Dividends and distributions per

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Share/Unit outstanding

 

$

2.24250

 

 

$

2.12375

 

 

$

1.51125

 

(1)

The Company’s fourth quarter 2019 dividends and distributions of $0.5675 per Common Share/Unit outstanding will be included as taxable income in calendar year 2020.

(2)

The Company’s fourth quarter 2018 dividends and distributions of $0.54 per Common Share/Unit outstanding was included as taxable income in calendar year 2019.


 Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Tax treatment of dividends and distributions:  
  
  
Ordinary dividends $0.722
 $1.591
 $1.475
Qualified dividends 
 0.037
 0.088
Long-term capital gain 9.176
 0.443
 0.280
Unrecaptured section 1250 gain 3.117
 0.139
 0.157
Dividends and distributions declared per  
  
  
Common Share/Unit outstanding $13.015
 $2.210
 $2.000

(3)

The Company’s fourth quarter 2017 dividends and distributions of $0.50375 per Common Share/Unit outstanding was included as taxable income in calendar year 2018.


The unaudited cost of land and depreciable property, net of accumulated depreciation, for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was approximately $15.8$13.7 billion and $17.0$14.0 billion, respectively.


Principles of Consolidation

The Company may hold an interest in subsidiaries, partnerships, joint ventures and other similar entities and accounts for these interests in accordance with the consolidation guidance. The Company first determines whether to consolidate the entity as a variable interest entity (“VIE”) or account for the interest under the equity method of accounting.  Equity investors of VIEs do not have sufficient equity at risk to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support or do not have substantive participating rights.  The Company consolidates an entity when it is considered to be the primary beneficiary or when it controls the entity through ownership of a majority voting interest.  A primary beneficiary has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s performance and has the obligation to absorb the expected losses or the right to receive the expected residual returns that could potentially be significant to the VIE.  In evaluating whether the entity is a VIE, the Company considers several factors, including, but not limited to, funding and financing sources, business purpose of the entity, related parties, developer and property management fees and agreement terms regarding major decisions, participating and voting rights, contributions and distributions.  

F-28


Table of Contents

Noncontrolling Interests


A noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (minority interest) is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent company'scompany’s equity.  In addition, consolidated net income is required to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest are


F-28


required to be disclosed on the face of the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.  See Note 3 for further discussion.

Operating Partnership:  Net income is allocated to noncontrolling interests based on their respective ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership.  The ownership percentage is calculated by dividing the number of OP Units held by the noncontrolling interests by the total OP Units held by the noncontrolling interests and EQR.  Issuance of additional Common Shares and OP Units changes the ownership interests of both the noncontrolling interests and EQR.  Such transactions and the related proceeds are treated as capital transactions.


Partially Owned Properties: The Company reflects noncontrolling interests in partially owned properties on the balance sheet for the portion of properties consolidated by the Company that are not wholly owned by the Company.  The earnings or losses from those properties attributable to the noncontrolling interests are generally based on ownership percentage and are reflected as noncontrolling interests in partially owned properties in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.


Partners'

Partners’ Capital

The "Limited Partners"“Limited Partners” of ERPOP include various individuals and entities that contributed their properties to ERPOP in exchange for OP Units.  The "General Partner"“General Partner” of ERPOP is EQR.  Net income is allocated to the Limited Partners based on their respective ownership percentage of ERPOP.  The ownership percentage is calculated by dividing the number of OP Units held by the Limited Partners by the total OP Units held by the Limited Partners and the General Partner.  Issuance of additional Common Shares and OP Units changes the ownership interests of both the Limited Partners and EQR.  Such transactions and the related proceeds are treated as capital transactions.


Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership / Redeemable Limited Partners

The Company classifies Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership / Redeemable Limited Partners in the mezzanine section of the consolidated balance sheets for the portion of OP Units that EQR is required, either by contract or securities law, to deliver registered Common Shares to the exchanging OP Unit holder.  The redeemable noncontrolling interest units / redeemable limited partner units are adjusted to the greater of carrying value or fair market value based on the Common Share price of EQR at the end of each respective reporting period.  See Note 3 for further discussion.


Use of Estimates

In preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.


Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications considered necessary for a fair presentation have been made to the prior period financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation.  These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations or equity/capital.


Recent

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements


In May 2014,June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB"(“FASB”) issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard entitled Revenue from Contracts with Customers that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance. The new standard specifically excludes lease revenue. The new standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Companies will likely need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current revenue recognition guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration, if any, to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018 and early adoption will be permitted beginning on January 1, 2017. The new standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or prospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company anticipates selecting the modified retrospective transition method with a cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption and will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2018. The Company is continuing to evaluate the standard; however, we do not expect


F-29


its adoption to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements, as in excess of 90% of total revenues consist of rental income from leasing arrangements, which is specifically excluded from the standard. In addition, the Company's fee and asset management activities are immaterial now that it sold its interest in Joint Base Lewis McChord (see Note 18 for further discussion) and given the nature of its disposition transactions, there should be no changes in accounting under the new standard.

In August 2014, the FASB issued a new standard that will explicitly require management to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. In connection with each annual and interim period, management will assess whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the issuance date. Disclosures will be required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt. However, to determine the specific disclosures, management will need to assess whether its plans will alleviate substantial doubt. The Company adopted this new standard as required effective for the annual period ending after December 31, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In February 2015, the FASB issued new consolidation guidance which makes changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model. Among other changes, the new standard specifically eliminated the presumption in the current voting model that a general partner controls a limited partnership or similar entity unless that presumption can be overcome. Generally, only a single limited partner that is able to exercise substantive kick-out rights will consolidate. The Company adopted this new standard as required effective January 1, 2016. While adoption of the new standard did not result in any changes to conclusions about whether a joint venture was consolidated or unconsolidated, the Company has determined that certain of its joint ventures and the Operating Partnership will now qualify as variable interest entities ("VIEs") and therefore will require additional disclosures. See Note 6 for further discussion.

In April 2015, the FASB issued a new standard which requires companies to present debt financing costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the associated debt liability rather than as an asset, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts on the consolidated balance sheets. Companies will be permitted to present debt issuance costs related to line of credit arrangements as an asset and amortize these costs over the term of the arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the arrangement. The new standard must be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.  The Company adopted this standard as required effective January 1, 2016 and other than presentation on the consolidated balance sheets, it did not have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position. As of December 31, 2016, $12.1 million, $16.3 million and $26.4 million of deferred financing costs were included within other assets, mortgage notes payable, net and notes, net respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2015, the following amounts of deferred financing costs were reclassified (amounts in thousands):

  As Originally
Presented
 Reclassification
Adjustments
 As Presented
Herein
Deferred financing costs, net $54,004
 $(54,004) $
Other assets $422,027
 $6,872
 $428,899
Mortgage notes payable, net $4,704,870
 $(19,736) $4,685,134
Notes, net $5,876,352
 $(27,396) $5,848,956

In January 2016, the FASB issued a new standard which requires companies to measure all equity securities with readily determinable fair values at fair value on the balance sheet, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. The Company does not expect that this will have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In February 2016, the FASB issued a new leases standard which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase of the leased asset by the lessee. This classification will determine whether the lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. The new standard is expected to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements as, among other things, the Company has certain operating ground lease arrangements for which it is the lessee. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The

F-30


Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new standard on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In March 2016, the FASB issued a new standard which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as equity or liability, statement of cash flows classification and policy election options for forfeitures. The new standard was effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. The Company will continue to estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjust the estimate when it is no longer probable that the employee will fulfill the service condition, as is currently required. The Company does not expect that this will have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In June 2016, the FASB issued a new standard which requires companies to adopt a new approach for estimating credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, such as trade and other receivables and loans.  The standard will requirerequires entities to estimate a lifetime expected credit loss for most financial instruments, including lease and other trade receivables.  In November 2018, the FASB issued an amendment excluding operating lease receivables accounted for under the new leases standard from the scope of the new credit losses standard.  The new standard will bewas effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2020 with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new standardand it did not have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations andor financial position.

F-29


Table of Contents

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

InMay2014,theFASBissuedacomprehensiverevenuerecognition standard entitled Revenue from Contracts with Customers that superseded nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance.  Thestandardspecificallyexcludesleaserevenue.  The standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or prospectively with the cumulative effect, if any, recognized as of the date of adoption.  The Company selected the modified retrospective transition method as of the date of adoption as required effectiveJanuary1,2018.  The majorityofrental income consistsof revenue from leasing arrangements, which is specifically excluded from the standard.  The Company analyzed its remaining revenue streams, inclusive of fee and asset management and gains and losses on sales, and concluded these revenue streams have the same timing and pattern of revenue recognition under the new guidance, and therefore the Company had no changes in revenue recognition with the adoption of the standard.  As such, adoption of the standard did not result in a cumulative adjustment recognized as of January 1, 2018, and the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, equity/capital or cash flows.

Additionally, as part of the revenue recognition standard, the FASB issued amendments related to partial sales of real estate.  Adoption of the partial sales standard did not result in a change of accounting for the Company related to its disposition process.  We concluded that the Company’s typical dispositions will continue to meet the criteria for sale and associated profit recognition under both standards.

In August 2016 and OctoberFebruary 2016, the FASB issued new standards to clarify how specific transactions are classified and presented on the statement of cash flows. Among other clarifications, the new standards specifically provide guidancea leases standard which sets out principles for the following items withinrecognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessors and lessees).  The standard requires the statement of cash flows which havefollowing:

Lessors – Leases are accounted for using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for operating, sales-type and financing leases, but aligned with the revenue recognition standard.  Lessors are required to allocate lease payments to separate lease and non-lease components of each lease agreement, with the non-lease components evaluated under the revenue recognition standard.

Lessees – Leases are accounted for using a dual approach, classifying leases as either operating or finance based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase of the leased asset by the lessee.  This classification determines whether the lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease (for operating leases) or based on an effective interest method (for finance leases).  A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on its balance sheet for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification as operating or finance leases.  Leases with a term of 12 months or less are accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases.

The Company adopted this standard as required significant judgment ineffective January 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective method and the past:


Cash payments related to debt prepayments or extinguishment costs are to be classified within financing activities;
The portionCompany applied the guidance as of the cash payment madeadoption date and elected certain practical expedients, as described below.  The standard impacted our consolidated balance sheets but did not impact our consolidated statements of operations. Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities where the Company is the lessee were recognized for various corporate office leases and ground leases.  The Company recorded ROU assets and related lease liabilities to settle a zero-coupon bondits opening balance sheet upon adoption on January 1, 2019 of $434.2 million and $278.3 million, respectively.  The Company calculated the net present value of the lease liabilities on January 1, 2019 and reclassed the following amounts from other assets and other liabilities to record our initial ROU assets (amounts in thousands):

 

 

January 1, 2019

 

 

Balance Sheet Reclass:

Initial lease liabilities

 

$

278,287

 

 

 

Reclassifications:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid ground leases

 

 

17,886

 

 

Other Assets

Ground lease intangibles – below market, net

 

 

166,230

 

 

Other Assets

Ground lease intangibles – above market, net

 

 

(2,110

)

 

Other Liabilities

Straight-line rent liabilities (1)

 

 

(26,092

)

 

Other Liabilities

Initial right-of-use assets

 

$

434,201

 

 

 

(1)

Straight-line rent liabilities relate to corporate office leases and certain ground leases.

The Company elected the practical expedient to not reassess the classification of existing operating leases.  As of January 1, 2019, any new or a bond with an insignificant cash coupon attributable to accreted interest related to a debt discount is tomodified ground leases may be classified as financing leases unless they meet certain conditions. When there is a cash outflow within operating activities,material lease modification, the Company is required to reassess the classification and remeasure the portion attributablelease liability.

F-30


Table of Contents

In July 2018, the FASB issued an amendment to the principal isleases standard, which includes a practical expedient that provides lessors an option not to be classified within financing activities;

Insurance settlement proceedsseparate lease and non-lease components when certain criteria are to be classified based onmet and instead account for those components as a single component under the natureleases standard.  The amendment also provides a transition option that permits the application of the loss;
Companies must elect to classify distributions received from equity method investees using either a cumulative earnings approach or a look-through approach andnew guidance as of the election must be disclosed; and
Restricted cash will be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are to be reconciled to the related line items on the balance sheet.

The new standards must be applied retrospectivelyadoption date rather than to all periods presented.  The Company elected the practical expedient to account for both its lease and non-lease components as a single component under the leases standard and elected the new transition option as of the date of adoption effective January 1, 2019. See Note 8 for additional discussion regarding the new lease standard.

In August 2017, the FASB issued a final standard which makes changes to the hedge accounting model to enable entities to better portray their risk management activities in the financial statements.  The standard expands an entity’s ability to hedge nonfinancial and financial risk components, reduces complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk and eases certain documentation and assessment requirements.  The standard also eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change in the fair value of any hedging instrument to be presented in the consolidated financial statements and they will besame income statement line as the hedged instrument.  The Company adopted this standard as required effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new standards2019 and it did not have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations andor financial position.


In January 2017, the FASB issued a new standard which clarifies definition of a business. The standard's objective is to add additional guidance that assists companies in determining whether transactions should be accounted for as an asset acquistion or a business combination. The new standard first requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set is not a business. If this threshold is not met, the entity next evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. Among other differences, transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions are capitalized while those associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred. In addition, purchase price in an asset acquisition is allocated on a relative fair value basis while in a business combination is generally measured at fair value. The new standard will be applied prospectively to any transactions occurring within the period of adoption. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018, but the Company early adopted it as allowed effective January 1, 2017. The Company anticipates that substantially all of its transactions will now be accounted for as asset acquisitions, which means transaction costs will largely be capitalized as noted above.

Other


The Company is the controlling partner in various consolidated partnerships owning 17 properties and 3,215consisting of 3,535 apartment units having a noncontrolling interest book valuebalance of $10.6$1.2 million at December 31, 2016.2019.  The Company is required to make certain disclosures regarding noncontrolling interests in consolidated limited-life subsidiaries.  Of the consolidated entities described above, the Company is the controlling partner in limited-life partnerships owning four4 properties having a noncontrolling interest deficit balance of $7.7$10.2 million.  These four partnership agreements contain provisions that require the partnerships to be liquidated through the sale of their assets upon reaching a date specified in each respective partnership agreement.  The Company, as controlling partner, has an obligation to cause the property owning partnerships to distribute the proceeds of liquidation to the Noncontrolling Interests in these Partially Owned Properties only to the extent that the net proceeds received by the partnerships from the sale of


F-31


their assets warrant a distribution based on the partnership agreements.  As of December 31, 2016,2019 the Company estimates the value of Noncontrolling Interest distributions for these four properties would have been approximately $62.6$78.9 million (“Settlement Value”) had the partnerships been liquidated.  This Settlement Value is based on estimated third party consideration realized by the partnerships upon disposition of the four Partially Owned Properties and is net of all other assets and liabilities, including yield maintenance on the mortgages encumbering the properties, that would have been due on December 31, 20162019 had those mortgages been prepaid.  Due to, among other things, the inherent uncertainty in the sale of real estate assets, the amount of any potential distribution to the Noncontrolling Interests in the Company'sCompany’s Partially Owned Properties is subject to change.  To the extent that the partnerships'partnerships’ underlying assets are worth less than the underlying liabilities, the Company has no obligation to remit any consideration to the Noncontrolling Interests in these Partially Owned Properties.


3.

3.

Equity, Capital and Other Interests


Equity

The Company refers to “Common Shares” and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests“Units” (which refer to both OP Units and restricted units) as equity securities for EQR and “General Partner Units” and “Limited Partner Units” as equity securities for ERPOP.  To provide a streamlined and more readable presentation of Equity Residential


the disclosures for the Company and the Operating Partnership, several sections below refer to the respective terminology for each with the same financial information and separate sections are provided, where needed, to further distinguish any differences in financial information and terminology.

F-31


Table of Contents

The following tables presenttable presents the changes in the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Shares and “Units” (which includes OP Units and restricted units) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014:2017:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Common Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares outstanding at January 1,

 

 

369,405,161

 

 

 

368,018,082

 

 

 

365,870,924

 

Common Shares Issued:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of OP Units

 

 

313,940

 

 

 

131,477

 

 

 

1,149,284

 

Exercise of share options

 

 

1,745,050

 

 

 

1,056,388

 

 

 

846,137

 

Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

 

48,131

 

 

 

75,414

 

 

 

68,286

 

Restricted share grants, net

 

 

158,602

 

 

 

123,800

 

 

 

83,451

 

Common Shares outstanding at December 31,

 

 

371,670,884

 

 

 

369,405,161

 

 

 

368,018,082

 

Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Units outstanding at January 1,

 

 

13,904,035

 

 

 

13,768,438

 

 

 

14,626,075

 

Restricted unit grants, net

 

 

141,220

 

 

 

267,074

 

 

 

291,647

 

Conversion of OP Units to Common Shares

 

 

(313,940

)

 

 

(131,477

)

 

 

(1,149,284

)

Units outstanding at December 31,

 

 

13,731,315

 

 

 

13,904,035

 

 

 

13,768,438

 

Total Common Shares and Units outstanding at December 31,

 

 

385,402,199

 

 

 

383,309,196

 

 

 

381,786,520

 

Units Ownership Interest in Operating Partnership

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

3.6

%

The following table presents the changes in the Operating Partnership’s issued and outstanding General Partner Units and Limited Partner Units for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

General and Limited Partner Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and Limited Partner Units outstanding at January 1,

 

 

383,309,196

 

 

 

381,786,520

 

 

 

380,496,999

 

Issued to General Partner:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise of EQR share options

 

 

1,745,050

 

 

 

1,056,388

 

 

 

846,137

 

EQR’s Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

 

48,131

 

 

 

75,414

 

 

 

68,286

 

EQR’s restricted share grants, net

 

 

158,602

 

 

 

123,800

 

 

 

83,451

 

Issued to Limited Partners:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted unit grants, net

 

 

141,220

 

 

 

267,074

 

 

 

291,647

 

General and Limited Partner Units outstanding at December 31,

 

 

385,402,199

 

 

 

383,309,196

 

 

 

381,786,520

 

Limited Partner Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited Partner Units outstanding at January 1,

 

 

13,904,035

 

 

 

13,768,438

 

 

 

14,626,075

 

Limited Partner restricted unit grants, net

 

 

141,220

 

 

 

267,074

 

 

 

291,647

 

Conversion of Limited Partner OP Units to EQR Common Shares

 

 

(313,940

)

 

 

(131,477

)

 

 

(1,149,284

)

Limited Partner Units outstanding at December 31,

 

 

13,731,315

 

 

 

13,904,035

 

 

 

13,768,438

 

Limited Partner Units Ownership Interest in Operating Partnership

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

3.6

%

  2016 2015 2014
Common Shares  
  
  
Common Shares outstanding at January 1, 364,755,444
 362,855,454
 360,479,260
Common Shares Issued:  
  
  
Conversion of OP Units 88,838
 208,307
 94,671
Exercise of share options 815,044
 1,456,363
 2,086,380
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 63,909
 68,462
 68,807
Restricted share grants, net 147,689
 168,142
 169,722
Common Shares Other:  
  
  
Conversion of restricted shares to restricted units 
 (1,284) (12,146)
Repurchased and retired 
 
 (31,240)
Common Shares outstanding at December 31, 365,870,924
 364,755,444
 362,855,454
Units  
  
  
Units outstanding at January 1, 14,427,164
 14,298,691
 14,180,376
Restricted unit grants, net 287,749
 335,496
 200,840
Conversion of restricted shares to restricted units 
 1,284
 12,146
Conversion of OP Units to Common Shares (88,838) (208,307) (94,671)
Units outstanding at December 31, 14,626,075
 14,427,164
 14,298,691
Total Common Shares and Units outstanding at December 31, 380,496,999
 379,182,608
 377,154,145
Units Ownership Interest in Operating Partnership 3.8% 3.8% 3.8%

The equity positions of various individuals and entities that contributed their properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units, as well as the equity positions of the holders of restricted units, are collectively referred to as the “Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership”. and “Limited Partners Capital,” respectively, for the Company and the Operating Partnership.  Subject to certain exceptions (including the “book-up” requirements of restricted units), the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Limited Partners Capital may exchange their Units with EQR for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis.  The carrying value of the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Limited Partners Capital (including redeemable interests) is allocated based on the number of Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership UnitsPartnership/Limited Partners Capital in total in proportion to the number of Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership UnitsPartnership/Limited Partners Capital in total plus the total number of Common Shares.Shares/General Partner Units.  Net income is allocated to the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Limited Partners Capital based on the weighted average ownership percentage during the period.


F-32


Table of Contents

The Operating Partnership has the right but not the obligation to make a cash payment instead of issuing Common Shares to any and all holders of Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership UnitsPartnership/Limited Partners Capital requesting an exchange of their OP UnitsNoncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership/Limited Partners Capital with EQR.  Once the Operating Partnership elects not to redeem the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership UnitsPartnership/Limited Partners Capital for cash, EQR is obligated to deliver Common Shares to the exchanging holder of the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership Units.


Partnership/Limited Partners Capital.

The Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership UnitsPartnership/Limited Partners Capital are classified as either mezzanine equity or permanent equity.  If EQR is required, either by contract or securities law, to deliver registered Common Shares, such Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Limited Partners Capital are differentiated and referred to as “Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership”.


F-32


and “Redeemable Limited Partners,” respectively.  Instruments that require settlement in registered shares cannot be classified in permanent equity as it is not always completely within an issuer’s control to deliver registered shares.  Therefore, settlement in cash is assumed and that responsibility for settlement in cash is deemed to fall to the Operating Partnership as the primary source of cash for EQR, resulting in presentation in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet.  The Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Redeemable Limited Partners are adjusted to the greater of carrying value or fair market value based on the Common Share price of EQR at the end of each respective reporting period.  EQR has the ability to deliver unregistered Common Shares for the remaining portion of the Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership UnitsPartnership/Limited Partners Capital that are classified in permanent equity at December 31, 20162019 and 2015.

2018.

The carrying value of the Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Redeemable Limited Partners is allocated based on the number of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership UnitsPartnership/Redeemable Limited Partners in proportion to the number of Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership UnitsPartnership/Limited Partners Capital in total.  Such percentage of the total carrying value of Units/Limited Partner Units which is ascribed to the Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Redeemable Limited Partners is then adjusted to the greater of carrying value or fair market value as described above.  As of December 31, 2016,2019 and 2018, the Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Redeemable Limited Partners have a redemption value of approximately $442.1$463.4 million and $379.1 million, respectively, which represents the value of Common Shares that would be issued in exchange withfor the Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership Units.

Partnership/Redeemable Limited Partners.

The following table presents the changes in the redemption value of the Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating PartnershipPartnership/Redeemable Limited Partners for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively (amounts in thousands):

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balance at January 1,

 

$

379,106

 

 

$

366,955

 

 

$

442,092

 

Change in market value

 

 

82,283

 

 

 

13,922

 

 

 

(41,916

)

Change in carrying value

 

 

2,011

 

 

 

(1,771

)

 

 

(33,221

)

Balance at December 31,

 

$

463,400

 

 

$

379,106

 

 

$

366,955

 

  2016 2015 2014
Balance at January 1, $566,783
 $500,733
 $363,144
Change in market value (115,093) 64,378
 139,818
Change in carrying value (9,598) 1,672
 (2,229)
Balance at December 31, $442,092
 $566,783
 $500,733

Net proceeds from EQR Common Share and Preferred Share (see definition below) offerings and proceeds from exercise of options for Common Shares are contributed by EQR to ERPOP.  In return for those contributions, EQR receives a number of OP Units in ERPOP equal to the number of Common Shares it has issued in the equity offering (or in the case of a preferred equity offering, a number of preference units in ERPOP equal in number and having the same terms as the Preferred Shares issued in the equity offering).  As a result, the net offering proceeds from Common Shares and Preferred Shares are allocated for the Company between shareholders’ equity and Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership and for the Operating Partnership between General Partner’s Capital and Limited Partners Capital to account for the change in their respective percentage ownership of the underlying equity of ERPOP.


equity.

The Company’s declaration of trust authorizes it to issue up to 100,000,000 preferred shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share (the “Preferred Shares”), with specific rights, preferences and other attributes as the Board of Trustees may determine, which may include preferences, powers and rights that are senior to the rights of holders of the Company’s Common Shares.


F-33


Table of Contents

The following table presents the Company’s issued and outstanding Preferred SharesShares/Preference Units as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015:2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts in thousands

 

 

 

 

 

Annual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Call

 

Dividend Per

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

Date (1)

 

Share/Unit (2)

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Preferred Shares/Preference Units of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value;

  100,000,000 shares authorized:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.29% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares/Preference

   Units; liquidation value $50 per share/unit; 745,600 shares/units issued

   and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018

 

12/10/26

 

$

4.145

 

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

37,280

 

      Amounts in thousands
  Redemption
Date (1)
 Annual
Dividend per
Share (2)
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Preferred Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value;
100,000,000 shares authorized:
        
8.29% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred; liquidation
value $50 per share; 745,600 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2016 and 2015
 12/10/26 $4.145
 $37,280
 $37,280
      $37,280
 $37,280

(1)

(1)

On or after the redemptioncall date, redeemable preferred sharesPreferred Shares/Preference Units may be redeemed for cash at the option of the Company or the Operating Partnership, respectively, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation price per share,share/unit, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, if any.

(2)

(2)

Dividends on Preferred Shares are payable quarterly.


During 2015, the Company repurchased and retired 254,400 Series K Preferred Shares with a par value of $12.7 million for total cash consideration of approximately $16.3 million. As a result of this partial redemption, the Company incurred a cash charge of approximately $3.5 million which was recorded as a premium on the redemption of Preferred Shares.



F-33


Capital and Redeemable Limited Partners of ERP Operating Limited Partnership

The following tables present the changes in the Operating Partnership's issued and outstanding Units and in the limited partners' Units for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:
  2016 2015 2014
General and Limited Partner Units  
  
  
General and Limited Partner Units outstanding at January 1, 379,182,608
 377,154,145
 374,659,636
Issued to General Partner:      
Exercise of EQR share options 815,044
 1,456,363
 2,086,380
EQR's Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP) 63,909
 68,462
 68,807
EQR's restricted share grants, net 147,689
 168,142
 169,722
Issued to Limited Partners:      
Restricted unit grants, net 287,749
 335,496
 200,840
OP Units Other:      
Repurchased and retired 
 
 (31,240)
General and Limited Partner Units outstanding at December 31, 380,496,999
 379,182,608
 377,154,145
Limited Partner Units  
  
  
Limited Partner Units outstanding at January 1, 14,427,164
 14,298,691
 14,180,376
Limited Partner restricted unit grants, net 287,749
 335,496
 200,840
Conversion of EQR restricted shares to restricted units 
 1,284
 12,146
Conversion of Limited Partner OP Units to EQR Common Shares (88,838) (208,307) (94,671)
Limited Partner Units outstanding at December 31, 14,626,075
 14,427,164
 14,298,691
Limited Partner Units Ownership Interest in Operating Partnership 3.8% 3.8% 3.8%
The Limited Partners of the Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2016 include various individuals and entities that contributed their properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units, as well as the equity positions of the holders of restricted units. Subject to certain exceptions (including the “book-up” requirements of restricted units), Limited Partners may exchange their Units with EQR for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis. The carrying value of the Limited Partner Units (including redeemable interests) is allocated based on the number of Limited Partner Units in total in proportion to the number of Limited Partner Units in total plus the number of General Partner Units. Net income is allocated to the Limited Partner Units based on the weighted average ownership percentage during the period.

The Operating Partnership has the right but not the obligation to make a cash payment instead of issuing Common Shares to any and all holders of Limited Partner Units requesting an exchange of their OP Units with EQR. Once the Operating Partnership elects not to redeem the Limited Partner Units for cash, EQR is obligated to deliver Common Shares to the exchanging limited partner.

The Limited Partner Units are classified as either mezzanine equity or permanent equity. If EQR is required, either by contract or securities law, to deliver registered Common Shares, such Limited Partner Units are differentiated and referred to as “Redeemable Limited Partner Units”. Instruments that require settlement in registered shares cannot be classified in permanent equity as it is not always completely within an issuer's control to deliver registered shares. Therefore, settlement in cash is assumed and that responsibility for settlement in cash is deemed to fall to the Operating Partnership as the primary source of cash for EQR, resulting in presentation in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet. The Redeemable Limited Partner Units are adjusted to the greater of carrying value or fair market value based on the Common Share price of EQR at the end of each respective reporting period. EQR has the ability to deliver unregistered Common Shares for the remaining portion of the Limited Partner Units that are classified in permanent equity at December 31, 2016 and 2015.

The carrying value of the Redeemable Limited Partner Units is allocated based on the number of Redeemable Limited Partner Units in proportion to the number of Limited Partner Units in total. Such percentage of the total carrying value of Limited Partner Units which is ascribed to the Redeemable Limited Partner Units is then adjusted to the greater of carrying value or fair market value as described above. As of December 31, 2016, the Redeemable Limited Partner Units have a redemption value of approximately $442.1 million, which represents the value of Common Shares that would be issued in exchange with the Redeemable Limited Partner Units.

The following table presents the changes in the redemption value of the Redeemable Limited Partners for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively (amounts in thousands):

F-34


  2016 2015 2014
Balance at January 1, $566,783
 $500,733
 $363,144
Change in market value (115,093) 64,378
 139,818
Change in carrying value (9,598) 1,672
 (2,229)
Balance at December 31, $442,092
 $566,783
 $500,733

EQR contributes all net proceeds from its various equity offerings (including proceeds from exercise of options for Common Shares) to ERPOP. In return for those contributions, EQR receives a number of OP Units in ERPOP equal to the number of Common Shares it has issued in the equity offering (or in the case of a preferred equity offering, a number of preference units in ERPOP equal in number and having the same terms as the preferred shares issued in the equity offering).
The following table presents the Operating Partnership's issued and outstanding “Preference Units” as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
      Amounts in thousands
  Redemption
Date (1)
 Annual
Dividend per
Unit (2)
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Preference Units:    
  
  
8.29% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units;
liquidation value $50 per unit; 745,600 units issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015
 12/10/26 $4.145
 $37,280
 $37,280
     
 $37,280
 $37,280
(1)
On or after the redemption date, redeemable preference units may be redeemed for cash at the option of the Operating Partnership, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation price per unit, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, if any, in conjunction with the concurrent redemption of the corresponding Company Preferred Shares.
(2)
Dividends on Shares/Preference Units are payable quarterly.


During 2015, the Operating Partnership repurchased and retired 254,400 Series K Preferred Shares with a par value of $12.7 million for total cash consideration of approximately $16.3 million, in conjunction with the concurrent redemption of the corresponding Company Preferred Shares. As a result of this partial redemption, the Operating Partnership incurred a cash charge of approximately $3.5 million which was recorded as a premium on the redemption of Preference Units.

Other

EQR and ERPOP currently have an active universal shelf registration statement for the issuance of equity and debt securities that automatically became effective upon filing with the SEC onin June 28, 20162019 and expires onin June 28, 2019.2022.  Per the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds of all equity offerings to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis) or preference units (on a one-for-one preferred share per preference unit basis).


In September 2009, the

The Company announced the establishment ofhas an At-The-Market (“ATM”) share offering program which would allowallows EQR to sell Common Shares from time to time into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions.  PerIn June 2019, the termsCompany extended the program maturity to June 2022.  In connection with the extension, the Company may now also sell Common Shares under forward sale agreements.  The use of ERPOP's partnershipa forward sale agreement EQR contributeswould allow the netCompany to lock in a price on the sale of Common Shares at the time the agreement is executed, but defer receiving the proceeds from all equity offerings to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional OP Units (onsale until a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis). The program currently has a maturity of June 2019.later date.  EQR has the authority to issue 13.0 million shares but has not issued any shares under this program since September 2012.


The Company may repurchase up to 13.0 million Common Shares under its share repurchase program.  No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2016NaN open market repurchases have occurred since 2008 and 2015.0 repurchases of any kind have occurred since February 2014.  As of December 31, 2016,2019, EQR has remaining authorization to repurchase up to 13.0 million of its shares under the repurchase program.

shares.


During the year ended December 31, 2014, EQR repurchased 31,240 of its Common Shares at an average price of $56.87 per share for total consideration of $1.8 million. These shares were retired subsequent to the repurchases. Concurrent with these transactions, ERPOP repurchased and retired 31,240 OP Units previously issued to EQR. All of the shares repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2014 were repurchased from employees at the then current market prices to cover the minimum statutory tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of employees' restricted shares.

F-35



During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company acquired all of its partners' interests in one consolidated partially owned property consisting of 268 apartment units and one consolidated partially owned land parcel for $5.5 million. In conjunction with these transactions, the Company reduced paid in capital (included in general partner's capital in the Operating Partnership's financial statements) by $2.3 million, Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties by $2.2 million and other liabilities by $1.0 million.

4.

4.

Real Estate Real Estate Held for Sale and Lease Intangibles


The following table summarizes the carrying amounts for the Company’s investment in real estate (at cost) as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Land

 

$

5,936,188

 

 

$

5,875,803

 

Depreciable property:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

18,904,686

 

 

 

18,232,625

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

��

1,916,458

 

 

 

1,722,231

 

In-Place lease intangibles

 

 

497,957

 

 

 

481,045

 

Projects under development:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

 

23,531

 

 

 

25,429

 

Construction-in-progress

 

 

158,099

 

 

 

83,980

 

Land held for development:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

 

64,460

 

 

 

61,038

 

Construction-in-progress

 

 

32,228

 

 

 

28,871

 

Investment in real estate

 

 

27,533,607

 

 

 

26,511,022

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(7,276,786

)

 

 

(6,696,281

)

Investment in real estate, net

 

$

20,256,821

 

 

$

19,814,741

 

  2016 2015
Land $5,899,862
 $5,864,046
Depreciable property:  
  
Buildings and improvements 16,913,430
 16,346,829
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 1,346,300
 1,207,098
In-Place lease intangibles 470,849
 483,160
Projects under development:  
  
Land 115,876
 284,995
Construction-in-progress 521,292
 837,381
Land held for development:  
  
Land 84,440
 120,007
Construction-in-progress 34,376
 38,836
Investment in real estate 25,386,425
 25,182,352
Accumulated depreciation (5,360,389) (4,905,406)
Investment in real estate, net $20,026,036
 $20,276,946

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts for the Company's above and below market ground and retail lease intangibles as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (amounts in thousands):
Description Balance Sheet Location 2016 2015
Assets      
Ground lease intangibles – below market Other Assets $178,251
 $178,251
Retail lease intangibles – above market Other Assets 1,260
 1,260
Lease intangible assets   179,511
 179,511
Accumulated amortization   (17,972) (13,451)
Lease intangible assets, net   $161,539
 $166,060
       
Liabilities      
Ground lease intangibles – above market Other Liabilities $2,400
 $2,400
Retail lease intangibles – below market Other Liabilities 5,270
 5,270
Lease intangible liabilities   7,670
 7,670
Accumulated amortization   (4,509) (3,414)
Lease intangible liabilities, net   $3,161
 $4,256

During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company amortized approximately $4.3 million in each year of above and below market ground lease intangibles which is included (net increase) in property and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company amortized approximately $0.9 million, $0.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of above and below market retail lease intangibles which is included (net increase) in rental income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.


F-36

F-34



The following table provides a summary of the aggregate amortization expense for above and below market ground lease intangibles and retail lease intangibles for each of the next five years (amounts in thousands):
  2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
           
Ground lease intangibles $4,321
 $4,321
 $4,321
 $4,321
 $4,321
Retail lease intangibles (540) (71) (71) (71) (67)
Total $3,781
 $4,250
 $4,250
 $4,250
 $4,254

Acquisitions and Dispositions


During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company acquired the entire equity interest in the following from unaffiliated parties (purchase price in thousands):

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment Units

 

 

Purchase Price

 

Rental Properties – Consolidated (1)

 

 

13

 

 

 

3,540

 

 

$

1,494,689

 

Land Parcels (four) (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,832

 

Total

 

 

13

 

 

 

3,540

 

 

$

1,514,521

 

  Properties Apartment Units Purchase Price
Rental Properties – Consolidated (1) 4
 573
 $249,334
Total 4
 573
 $249,334

(1)

(1)

Purchase price includes an allocation of approximately $98.0$268.3 million to land and $151.3$1.229 billion to depreciable property (inclusive of capitalized closing costs).

(2)

Purchase price includes an allocation of approximately $16.7 million to depreciable property.vacant land and $4.9 million to construction-in-progress (inclusive of capitalized closing costs).  Land parcels include entry into two long-term ground leases for land projects under development in the Washington D.C. market, of which one land parcel is subject to a fully prepaid ground lease. See Notes 6 and 8 for additional discussion.  


During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, the Company acquired the entire equity interest in the following from unaffiliated parties (purchase price in thousands):

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment Units

 

 

Purchase Price

 

Rental Properties – Consolidated (1)

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

$

707,005

 

Total

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

$

707,005

 

  Properties Apartment Units Purchase Price
Rental Properties – Consolidated (1) 4
 625
 $296,037
Land Parcels (2) 
 
 27,800
Total 4
 625
 $323,837

(1)

(1)

Purchase price includes an allocation of approximately $44.7$113.7 million to land and $251.3$594.4 million to depreciable property.property (inclusive of capitalized closing costs).

(2)The Company acquired three contiguous land parcels in San Francisco during 2015 which will be combined for future development.

During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company disposed of the following to unaffiliated parties (sales price in thousands):

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment Units

 

 

Sales Price

 

Rental Properties – Consolidated

 

 

11

 

 

 

2,361

 

 

$

1,080,675

 

Rental Properties – Unconsolidated (1)

 

 

2

 

 

 

945

 

 

 

394,500

 

Land Parcels (two)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,100

 

Total

 

 

13

 

 

 

3,306

 

 

$

1,477,275

 

  Properties Apartment Units Sales Price
Consolidated:      
Rental Properties (1) 98
 29,440
 $6,811,503
Land Parcels 
 
 57,455
Unconsolidated:      
Rental Properties (2) 1
 336
 74,500
Total 99
 29,776
 $6,943,458

(1)

(1)Includes

The Company owned a 20% interest in both unconsolidated rental properties. Sales price listed is the Starwood Portfolio sale (see further discussion below) representing 72 operating properties consistinggross sales price. The Company received net sales proceeds of 23,262 apartment units for $5.365 billion.approximately $78.3 million.

(2) The Company owned a 20% interest in this unconsolidated rental property. Sale price listed is the gross sale price. The Company's share of the net sales proceeds approximated $12.4 million.

The Company recognized a net gain on sales of real estate properties of approximately $4.0 billion (inclusive$447.6 million, a net gain on sales of $3.2 billion on the Starwood Portfolio sale),unconsolidated entities of approximately $69.5 million and a net gain on sales of land parcels of approximately $15.7 million and a net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities of approximately $8.9$2.0 million on the above sales.


During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, the Company disposed of the following to unaffiliated parties (sales price in thousands):

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment Units

 

 

Sales Price

 

Rental Properties – Consolidated

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,292

 

 

$

706,120

 

Land Parcels (one)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,700

 

Total

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,292

 

 

$

708,820

 

  Properties Apartment Units Sales Price
Consolidated:      
Rental Properties (1) 8
 1,857
 $513,312
Total 8
 1,857
 $513,312

F-37


(1)Includes a 193,230 square foot medical office building adjacent to our Longfellow Place property in Boston with a sales price of approximately $123.3 million which is not included in the Company's property and apartment unit counts.

The Company recognized a net gain on sales of real estate properties of approximately $335.1$256.8 million and a net gain on sales of land parcels of approximately $1.0 million on the above sales.


Starwood Disposition

Following

Impairment

During the approval by the Company's Board of Trustees,year ended December 31, 2018, the Company executedrecorded an agreement with controlled affiliates of Starwood Capital Group ("Starwood")approximate $0.7 million non-cash asset impairment charge on October 23, 2015 to sell a portfolio of 72 operating properties consisting of 23,262 apartment unitsproperty located in five markets across the United States for $5.365 billion (the "Starwood Transaction" or "Starwood Portfolio"). AsSan Francisco market due to physical property damage as a result of a fire at 1 of the buildings at the property.

F-35


Table of Contents

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Starwood had deposited $250.0 million in cash into escrow as earnest money, which was non-refundable unless2017, the Company defaultedrecorded an approximate $1.7 million non-cash asset impairment charge on the sales agreement. On January 26 and 27, 2016, the Company closed on thea land parcel that was being marketed for sale, of the entire portfolio described above. As a result, the Starwood Transaction met thewhich is included in land held for sale criteria at December 31, 2015. In accordance with this classification,development on the Company ceased depreciation on all assets in the Starwood Portfolio as of November 1, 2015 and the following assets were classified as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2015 (amountsand included in thousands):

  December 31, 2015
Land $602,737
Depreciable property:  
Buildings and improvements 2,386,489
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 335,565
In-Place lease intangibles 35,554
Real estate held for sale before accumulated depreciation 3,360,345
Accumulated depreciation (1,179,210)
Real estate held for sale $2,181,135

the non-same store/other segment discussed in Note 17.  The following table providescharge was the operating segments/locationsresult of an analysis of the propertiesparcel’s estimated fair value (determined using internally developed models based on market assumptions and apartment unitspotential sales data from the marketing process) compared to its current capitalized carrying value.  The parcel was sold in the Starwood Transaction, which represents substantially all of the assets in the Company's South Florida and Denver markets and certain assets in the Washington D.C., Seattle and Los Angeles markets. The sale of these properties represents the continuation of the Company's long-term strategy of investing in six core coastal markets. See Note 11 for further discussion.
2019.

Markets/Metro Areas Properties Apartment Units
South Florida 33
 10,742
Denver 18
 6,635
Washington D.C. 10
 3,020
Seattle 8
 1,721
Los Angeles 3
 1,144
Total 72
 23,262

The Company used proceeds from the Starwood Transaction and other 2016 sales discussed above to pay special dividends of $8.00 per share/unit (approximately $3.0 billion) on March 10, 2016 and $3.00 per share/unit (approximately $1.1 billion) on October 14, 2016. The Company used the majority of the remaining proceeds to reduce aggregate indebtedness in order to make the transaction leverage neutral. See Note 8 for further discussion.

Other

In December 2011, the Company and Toll Brothers (NYSE: TOL) jointly acquired a vacant land parcel at 400 Park Avenue South in New York City. The Company's and Toll Brothers' allocated portions of the purchase price were approximately $76.1 million and $57.9 million, respectively. The acquisition was financed through contributions by the Company and Toll Brothers of approximately $102.5 million and $75.7 million, respectively, which included the land purchase noted above, restricted deposits and taxes and fees. Until the core and shell of the building were complete, the building and land were owned jointly and were required to be consolidated on the Company's balance sheet as the Company was the managing member and Toll Brothers did not have substantive kick-out or participating rights. In July 2015, the Company recorded the master condominium declaration for this development project and as a result, the Toll Brothers’ portion of the property was deconsolidated from the Company's balance sheet. The Company now solely owns the rental portion of the building (floors 2-22) and the ground floor retail and Toll

F-38


Brothers solely owns the for sale portion of the building (floors 23-40). The joint venture no longer owns any real property. In conjunction with this transaction, the Company reduced investment in real estate by $116.7 million, noncontrolling interests in partially owned properties by $117.3 million and accrued retainage by $1.1 million and increased other liabilities by $1.7 million (to account for Toll Brothers' restricted cash still held by the Company). The deconsolidation of the Toll Brothers' portion of the project had no impact on the consolidated results of operations and comprehensive income.

5.

5.

Commitments to Acquire/Dispose of Real Estate


The Company has not entered into any separate agreements to acquire rental properties or land parcels as of February 17, 2017.


the date of filing.  

The Company has entered into separate agreements to dispose of the following (sales price in thousands):

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment Units

 

 

Sales Price

 

Rental Properties – Consolidated

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,416

 

 

$

723,500

 

Land Parcels (two)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55,150

 

Total

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,416

 

 

$

778,650

 

  Properties Apartment Units Sales Price
Rental Properties 2
 592
 $98,700
Land Parcels (two) 
 
 36,150
Total 2
 592
 $134,850

The closingsclosing of these pending transactions areis subject to certain conditions and restrictions,restrictions; therefore, there can be no assurance that thesethe transactions will be consummated or that the final terms will not differ in material respects from thoseany agreements summarized inabove.  See Note 18 for discussion of the preceding paragraphs.

properties acquired or disposed of, if any, subsequent to December 31, 2019.


6.

6.

Investments in Partially Owned Entities


The Company has co-invested in various properties with unrelated third parties which are either consolidated or accounted for under the equity method of accounting (unconsolidated).  The following tables and information summarize the Company’s investments in partially owned entities as

Consolidated VIEs

In accordance with accounting standards for consolidation of December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands except for project and apartment unit amounts):



F-39


  Consolidated Unconsolidated
         
  (VIE) (Non-VIE) (VIE) (1) Total
         
Total properties 17
 2
 
 2
         
Total apartment units 3,215
 945
 
 945
         
Balance sheet information at 12/31/16 (at 100%):        
ASSETS        
Investment in real estate $646,320
 $235,821
 $172,995
 $408,816
Accumulated depreciation (211,038) (32,881) (44,544) (77,425)
Investment in real estate, net 435,282
 202,940
 128,451
 331,391
Cash and cash equivalents 30,271
 5,287
 47
 5,334
Investments in unconsolidated entities 46,908
 
 
 
Deposits – restricted 345
 262
 
 262
Other assets 26,203
 157
 334
 491
       Total assets $539,009
 $208,646
 $128,832
 $337,478
         
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY/CAPITAL        
Mortgage notes payable, net (2) $301,110
 $145,424
 $
 $145,424
Accounts payable & accrued expenses 1,088
 189
 135
 324
Accrued interest payable 1,037
 691
 
 691
Other liabilities 600
 268
 70
 338
Security deposits 1,850
 493
 
 493
       Total liabilities 305,685
 147,065
 205
 147,270
         
Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties/Partners' equity 10,609
 59,115
 86,120
 145,235
Company equity/General and Limited Partners' Capital 222,715
 2,466
 42,507
 44,973
       Total equity/capital 233,324
 61,581
 128,627
 190,208
       Total liabilities and equity/capital $539,009
 $208,646
 $128,832
 $337,478

  Consolidated Unconsolidated
  (VIE) (Non-VIE) (VIE) (1) Total
Operating information for the year ended 12/31/16 (at 100%):        
Operating revenue $90,634
 $26,615
 $5,214
 $31,829
Operating expenses 21,647
 9,088
 2,023
 11,111
         
Net operating income 68,987
 17,527
 3,191
 20,718
Property management 3,190
 776
 75
 851
General and administrative/other 328
 2
 81
 83
Depreciation 20,764
 10,510
 5,501
 16,011
         
Operating income (loss) 44,705
 6,239
 (2,466) 3,773
Interest and other income 53
 
 
 
Other expenses (8) 
 
 
Interest:        
Expense incurred, net (13,857) (8,289) 
 (8,289)
Amortization of deferred financing costs (345) (1) 
 (1)
         
Income (loss) before income and other taxes and (loss)
from investments in unconsolidated entities
 30,548
 (2,051) (2,466) (4,517)
Income and other tax (expense) benefit (73) (13) 
 (13)
(Loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities
 (1,439) 
 
 
         
Net income (loss) $29,036
 $(2,064) $(2,466) $(4,530)
(1)Includes the Company's unconsolidated interest in an entity that owns the land underlying our Wisconsin Place apartment property and owns and operates the parking facility. This entity is excluded from the property and apartment unit count.
(2)All debt is non-recourse to the Company.

F-40


Note: The above tables exclude EQR's ownership interest in ERPOP and the Company's interests in unconsolidated joint ventures established in connection with the acquisition of certain real estate related assets from Archstone Enterprise LP (such assets are referred to herein as "Archstone"). These ventures owned certain Archstone assets and succeeded to certain residual Archstone liabilities/litigation, as well as responsibility for tax protection arrangements and third-party preferred interests in former Archstone subsidiaries. The preferred interests had an aggregate liquidation value of $39.9 million at December 31, 2016. The ventures are owned 60% by the Company. See below for further discussion.

During the year ended December 31, 2016,VIEs, the Company and its joint venture partners sold two consolidated partially owned properties consisting of 556 apartment units and recognized a net gainconsolidates ERPOP on sale of $54.3 million as well as one unconsolidated partially owned property consisting of 336 apartment units and recognized a net gain on the sale of approximately $8.9 million.

Operating Properties
The Company has various equity interests in certain limited partnerships owning 16 properties containing 2,783 apartment units. Each partnership owns a multifamily property. The Company is the general partner of these limited partnerships and is responsible for managing the operations and affairs of the partnerships as well as making all decisions regarding the businesses of the partnerships. The limited partners are not able to exercise substantive kick-out or participating rights. As a result, the partnerships qualify as VIEs. The Company has a controllingEQR’s financial interest in the VIEs and, thus, is the VIEs' primary beneficiary. The Company has both the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs' economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. As a result, the partnerships are required to be consolidated on the Company's balance sheet.
The Company has a 75% equity interest in the Wisconsin Place joint venture. The project contains a mixed-use site located in Chevy Chase, Maryland consisting of residential, retail, office and accessory uses, including underground parking facilities. The joint venture owns the 432 unit residential component, but has no ownership interest in the retail and office components. At December 31, 2016, the residential component had a net book value of $170.8 million. The Company is the managing member and is responsible for conducting all administrative day-to-day matters and affairs of the joint venture as well as implementing all decisions with respect to the joint venture. The limited partner is not able to exercise substantive kick-out or participating rights. As a result, the joint venture qualifies as a VIE. The Company has a controlling financial interest in the VIE and, thus, is the VIE's primary beneficiary. The Company has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. As a result, the entity that owns the residential component is required to be consolidated on the Company's balance sheet.

The Wisconsin Place joint venture also retains an unconsolidated interest in an entity that owns the land underlying the entire project and owns and operates the parking facility. At December 31, 2016, the basis of this investment was $46.9 million. The joint venture, as a limited partner, does not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the entity. As a result, the entity qualifies as a VIE. The joint venture does not have a controlling financial interest in the VIE and is not the VIE's primary beneficiary. The joint venture does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance or the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. As a result, the entity that owns the land and owns and operates the parking facility is unconsolidated and recorded using the equity method of accounting.

The Company has a 20% equity interest in each of the Nexus Sawgrass and Domain joint ventures. The Nexus Sawgrass joint venture owns a 501 unit apartment property located in Sunrise, Florida and the Company's interest had a basis of $5.0 million at December 31, 2016. The Domain joint venture owns a 444 unit apartment property located in San Jose, California and the Company's interest had a basis of $9.3 million at December 31, 2016. Nexus Sawgrass and Domain were completed and stabilized during the quarters ended September 30, 2014 and March 31, 2015, respectively. Construction on both properties was predominantly funded with long-term, non-recourse secured loans from the partner. The mortgage loan on Nexus Sawgrass has a current unconsolidated outstanding balance of $48.6 million, bears interest at 5.60% and matures January 1, 2021. The mortgage loan on Domain has a current unconsolidated outstanding balance of $96.8 million, bears interest at 5.75% and matures January 1, 2022. While the Company is the managing member of both of the joint ventures, was responsible for constructing both of the properties and gave certain construction cost overrun guarantees, the joint venture partner has significant participating rights and has active involvement in and oversight of the operations. As a result, the entities do not qualify as VIEs. The Company alone does not have the power to direct the activities of the entities that most significantly impact the entities' economic performance and as a result, the entities are unconsolidated and recorded using the equity method of accounting. The Company currently has no further funding obligations related to these properties.



F-41


Other
statements.  As the sole general partner of ERPOP, EQR has exclusive control of ERPOP'sERPOP’s day-to-day management.  The limited partners are not able to exercise substantive kick-out or participating rights.  As a result, ERPOP qualifies as a VIE.  EQR has a controlling financial interest in ERPOP and, thus, is ERPOP'sERPOP’s primary beneficiary.  EQR has the power to direct the activities of ERPOP that most significantly impact ERPOP'sERPOP’s economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from ERPOP that could potentially be significant to ERPOP.  As a result, ERPOP

The Company has various equity interests in certain joint ventures owning 17 properties containing 3,535 apartment units.  The Company is required to be consolidated on EQR's balance sheet.


On February 27, 2013, in connection with the acquisitiongeneral partner or managing member of Archstone, subsidiariesthese joint ventures and is responsible for managing the operations and affairs of the Company entered into three limited liability company agreements (collectively,joint ventures as well as making all decisions regarding the “Residual JV”). The Residual JV owned certain Archstone assets and succeeded to certain residual Archstone liabilities/litigation. The Residual JV is owned 60% by the Company and 40% by its joint venture partner. The Company's initial investment was $147.6 million and the Company's basis at December 31, 2016 was a net obligation of $1.1 million. The Residual JV is managed by a Management Committee consisting of two members from eachbusinesses of the Company and its joint venture partner. Bothventures.  The limited partners have equal participation in the Management Committee and all significantor non-managing members are not able to exercise substantive kick-out or participating rights are shared by both partners.rights.  As a result, the Residual JV does notjoint ventures qualify as a VIE.VIEs.  The Company alone does not havehas a controlling financial interest in the VIEs and, thus, is the VIEs’ primary beneficiary.  The Company has both the power to direct the activities of the Residual JVVIEs that most significantly impact the Residual JV'sVIEs’ economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs.  As a result, the joint ventures are required to be consolidated on the Company’s financial statements.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into 2 consolidated joint ventures, both of which have been deemed to be VIEs and as a reuslt,are consolidated due to the Residual JV isCompany being the primary beneficiary.  The joint ventures own two separate land parcels which they are currently developing into multifamily rental properties.

The consolidated assets and liabilities related to the VIEs discussed above were approximately $754.7 million and $323.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2019 and approximately $713.6 million and $313.9 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018.

F-36


Table of Contents

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

The following table and information summarizes the Company’s investments in unconsolidated and recorded usingentities, which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Residual JV has sold allaccounting as the requirements for consolidation are not met, as of the real estate assets that were acquired as part of the acquisition of Archstone, including all of the German assets, and is in the process of winding down all remaining activities.


On February 27, 2013, in connection with the acquisition of Archstone, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a limited liability company agreement (the “Legacy JV”), through which they assumed obligations of Archstone in the form of preferred interests, some of which are governed by tax protection arrangements. At December 31, 2016, the remaining preferred interests had an aggregate liquidation value of $39.9 million, our share of which is included2019 and December 31, 2018 (amounts in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Obligations of the Legacy JV are borne 60% by the Company and 40% by its joint venture partner. The Legacy JV is managed by a Management Committee consisting of two members from each of the Company and its joint venture partner. Both partners have equal participation in the Management Committee and all significant participating rights are shared by both partners. As a result, the Legacy JV does not qualify as a VIE. The Company alone does not have the power to direct the activities of the Legacy JV that most significantly impact the Legacy JV's economic performance and as a result, the Legacy JV is unconsolidated and recorded using the equity method of accounting.thousands except for ownership percentage):

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

Ownership Percentage

 

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Property (VIE) (1)

$

40,361

 

 

$

42,365

 

 

33.3%

 

Operating Properties (Non-VIE) (2)

 

 

 

 

10,494

 

 

20.0%

 

Real Estate Technology/Other

 

11,877

 

 

 

5,490

 

 

Varies

 

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

$

52,238

 

 

$

58,349

 

 

 

 

 


(1)

7.
Deposits –Restricted

Represents an unconsolidated interest in an entity that owns the land underlying one of the consolidated joint venture properties noted above and Escrow Deposits – Mortgage

owns and operates a related parking facility.  The joint venture, as a limited partner, does not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the entity.  As a result, the entity qualifies as a VIE.  The joint venture does not have a controlling financial interest in the VIE and is not the VIE’s primary beneficiary.  The joint venture does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance or the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.  As a result, the entity that owns the land and owns and operates the parking facility is unconsolidated and recorded using the equity method of accounting.


(2)

Includes 2 joint ventures under separate agreements with the same partner totaling 945 apartment units as of December 31, 2018.  During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company and its joint venture partner sold both properties under separate agreements to unaffiliated parties.  See Note 4 for additional discussion.

7.

Restricted Deposits

The following table presents the Company’s restricted deposits as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

Mortgage escrow deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate taxes and insurance

 

$

 

 

$

876

 

Replacement reserves

 

 

8,543

 

 

 

8,641

 

Mortgage principal reserves/sinking funds

 

 

9,689

 

 

 

9,754

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

852

 

Mortgage escrow deposits

 

 

18,232

 

 

 

20,123

 

Restricted cash:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax-deferred (1031) exchange proceeds

 

 

14,232

 

 

 

 

Earnest money on pending acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

Restricted deposits on real estate investments

 

 

658

 

 

 

540

 

Resident security and utility deposits

 

 

37,140

 

 

 

35,659

 

Other

 

 

984

 

 

 

7,549

 

Restricted cash

 

 

53,014

 

 

 

48,748

 

Restricted deposits

 

$

71,246

 

 

$

68,871

 

8.

Leases

Lessor Accounting

The Company is the lessor for its residential and retail leases (including commercial leases) and these leases will continue to be accounted for as operating leases under the new standard as described in Note 2.  Therefore, the Company did not have significant changes in the accounting for its lease revenues.  

For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 97% of the Company’s total lease revenue is generated from residential apartment leases that are generally twelve months or less in length.  The residential apartment leases may include lease income related to such items as RUBS income, parking, storage and pet rent that the Company treats as a single lease component because the amenities cannot be leased on their own and the timing and pattern of revenue recognition are the same.  The collection of lease payments at lease commencement is probable and therefore the Company subsequently recognizes lease income over the lease term on a straight-line basis.  Residential leases are renewable upon consent of both parties on an annual or monthly basis.

F-37


Table of Contents

For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 3% of the Company’s total lease revenue is generated by retail leases that are generally for terms ranging between five to ten years.  The retail leases generally consist of ground floor retail spaces and master-leased parking garages that serve as additional amenities for our residents.  The retail leases may include lease income related to such items as RUBS income, parking rent and storage rent that the Company treats as a single lease component because the amenities cannot be leased on their own and the timing and pattern of revenue recognition are the same.  The collection of lease payments at lease commencement is probable and therefore the Company subsequently recognizes lease income over the lease term on a straight-line basis.  Retail leases are renewable with market-based renewal options.

The Company elected the practical expedient to account for both its lease and non-lease components (specifically common area maintenance charges) as a single lease component under the leases standard.  

The following table presents the lease income types relating to lease payments for residential and retail leases for the year ended December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

Lease Income Type

 

Residential Leases

 

 

Retail Leases

 

 

Total

 

 

Residential and retail rent

 

$

2,414,201

 

 

$

71,988

 

 

$

2,486,189

 

 

Utility recoveries (RUBS income) (1)

 

 

67,659

 

 

 

917

 

 

 

68,576

 

 

Parking rent

 

 

37,557

 

 

 

348

 

 

 

37,905

 

 

Storage rent

 

 

3,745

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

3,816

 

 

Pet rent

 

 

11,617

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,617

 

 

Total lease revenue (2)

 

$

2,534,779

 

 

$

73,324

 

 

$

2,608,103

 

 

(1)

RUBS income primarily consists of variable payments representing the recovery of utility costs from residents.

(2)

Excludes other rental income of $92.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is accounted for under the revenue recognition standard discussed in Note 2.

  December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Tax-deferred (1031) exchange proceeds $38,847
 $
Earnest money on pending acquisitions 
 1,000
Restricted deposits on real estate investments 733
 6,077
Resident security and utility deposits 37,007
 48,458
Other 359
 358
Totals $76,946
 $55,893

Lessee Accounting

The Company is the lessee under various corporate office and ground leases for which the Company recognized ROU assets and related lease liabilities effective January 1, 2019.  The following table presents the Company’s escrow depositsROU assets and related lease liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and 20152019 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

2019

 

Right-of-use assets:

 

 

 

 

Corporate office leases

 

$

41,596

 

Ground leases (finance)

 

 

57,982

 

Ground leases (operating)

 

 

413,196

 

Right-of-use assets

 

$

512,774

 

Lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Corporate office leases

 

$

43,105

 

Ground leases (finance)

 

 

23,239

 

Ground leases (operating)

 

 

264,990

 

Lease liabilities

 

$

331,334

 

As the standard requires the recognition of a liability for the lease obligation, discount rates are used to determine the net present value of the lease payments.  The discount rate for the lease is the rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the incremental borrowing rate.  As the Company does not know the amount of the lessors’ initial direct costs, it cannot readily determine the rate implicit in the lease and instead must apply the incremental borrowing rate.  The Company has estimated the discount rate ranges of 3.3% to 3.9% for corporate office leases and 4.4% to 5.5% for ground leases at adoption.  Since the Company’s credit backs the corporate office lease obligations and the lease terms are generally ten years or less, the discount rate range was estimated by using the Company’s borrowing rates for actual pricing data.  The discount rate range for ground leases takes into account various factors, including the longer life of the ground leases, and was estimated by using the Company’s borrowing rates for actual pricing data through 30 years and other long-term market rates.  

Corporate office leases

The Company leases 9 corporate offices with lease expiration dates ranging from 2021 through 2042 (inclusive of applicable extension options).  The Company’s corporate office leases continue to be accounted for as operating leases under the new standard.  During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company modified 4 office leases that continue to be classified as operating leases

F-38


Table of Contents

and recorded an additional lease liability and ROU asset at initial remeasurement of approximately $32.1 million.  See Note 15 for details on a corporate office lease with a related party.

Ground leases

The Company maintains long-term ground leases for 14 operating properties and two projects under development with lease expiration dates ranging from 2042 through 2118 (inclusive of applicable purchase options).  The Company owns the building and improvements.  Based on its election of the package of practical expedients, the Company was not required to reassess the classification of existing ground leases at adoption and therefore the 14 operating property leases continue to be accounted for as operating leases.  During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into two new ground leases, one of which is a fully prepaid ground lease, for projects under development that are being accounted for as finance leases and recorded initial ROU assets of approximately $57.9 million and lease liabilities of approximately $23.2 million.

Ground Lease Intangibles

Effective on January 1, 2019 with the adoption of the new leasing standard, ground lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization were reclassed from other assets and other liabilities and are reported within the ROU assets on the consolidated balance sheets.  See Note 2 for discussion of the opening balance of ROU assets.  The following table summarizes the Company’s ground lease intangibles as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

Description

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ground lease intangibles

 

$

189,518

 

 

$

191,918

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(29,861

)

 

 

(25,688

)

Ground lease intangible assets, net (1)

 

$

159,657

 

 

$

166,230

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ground lease intangibles

 

$

 

 

$

2,400

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

 

 

 

(290

)

Ground lease intangible liabilities, net (1)

 

$

 

 

$

2,110

 

  December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Real estate taxes and insurance $2,003
 $1,977
Replacement reserves 3,428
 3,962
Mortgage principal reserves/sinking funds 58,652
 50,155
Other 852
 852
Totals $64,935
 $56,946


(1)

8.Debt

As of December 31, 2019, ground lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization are included within the ROU assets on the consolidated balance sheets.  As of December 31, 2018, the ground lease intangibles were included within other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

The following table provides a summary of the effect of the amortization for ground lease intangibles on the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (amounts in thousands):


Description

 

Income Statement Location

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Ground lease intangible amortization

 

Property and Maintenance

 

$

(4,463

)

 

$

(4,463

)

 

$

(4,369

)

The following table provides a summary of the aggregate amortization for ground lease intangibles for each of the next five years (amounts in thousands):

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

Ground lease intangibles

 

$

(4,463

)

 

$

(4,463

)

 

$

(4,463

)

 

$

(4,463

)

 

$

(4,463

)

F-39


Table of Contents

Additional disclosures

The following tables illustrate the quantitative disclosures for lessees as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended

December 31, 2019

 

Lease cost:

 

 

 

 

Finance lease cost:

 

 

 

 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

 

$

 

Interest on lease liabilities (capitalized)

 

 

225

 

Operating lease cost:

 

 

 

 

Corporate office leases

 

 

3,937

 

Ground leases

 

 

22,198

 

Variable lease cost:

 

 

 

 

Corporate office leases

 

 

1,489

 

Ground leases

 

 

3,700

 

Total lease cost

 

$

31,549

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Other information:

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Investing cash flows from finance leases (capitalized)

 

$

34,922

 

Operating cash flows from operating leases:

 

 

 

 

Corporate office leases

 

$

5,494

 

Ground leases

 

$

16,837

 

ROU assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities

 

$

23,201

 

ROU assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Corporate office leases

 

$

44,298

 

Ground leases

 

$

422,018

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases (1)

 

19.7 years

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases:

 

 

 

 

Corporate office leases

 

18.1 years

 

Ground leases

 

56.2 years

 

Weighted-average discount rate – finance leases

 

 

3.0

%

Weighted-average discount rate – operating leases:

 

 

 

 

Corporate office leases

 

 

3.2

%

Ground leases

 

 

5.0

%

(1)

The weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases does not include the remaining term of a fully prepaid finance lease entered into during the year ended December 31, 2019.

The following table summarizes the Company’s undiscounted cash flows for contractual obligations for minimum rent payments/receipts under operating and financing leases for the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2019:

(Payments)/Receipts Due by Year (in thousands)

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

Finance Leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Rent Payments (a)

 

$

(567

)

 

$

(578

)

 

$

(590

)

 

$

(601

)

 

$

(614

)

 

$

(33,850

)

 

$

(36,800

)

Operating Leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Rent Payments (a)

 

$

(16,914

)

 

$

(17,161

)

 

$

(16,907

)

 

$

(16,998

)

 

$

(17,330

)

 

$

(979,172

)

 

$

(1,064,482

)

Minimum Rent Receipts (b)

 

$

64,527

 

 

$

61,817

 

 

$

58,204

 

 

$

50,906

 

 

$

43,784

 

 

$

154,898

 

 

$

434,136

 

(a)

Minimum basic rent due for corporate office leases and base rent due on ground leases where the Company is the lessee.

(b)

Minimum basic rent receipts due for various retail space where the Company is the lessor.  Excludes residential leases due to their short-term nature.

F-40


Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of lease liabilities from our undiscounted cash flows for minimum rent payments as of December 31, 2019 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

2019

 

Total minimum rent payments

 

$

1,101,282

 

Less: Lease discount

 

 

769,948

 

Lease liabilities

 

$

331,334

 

9.

Debt

EQR does not have any indebtedness as all debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership.  EQR guarantees the Operating


F-42


Partnership’s revolving credit facility up to the maximum amount andWeighted average interest rates noted below for the full term of the facility. See Note 2 for a discussion regarding adoption of the new accounting standard impacting deferred financing costs.

Mortgage Notes Payable

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding mortgage debt of approximately $4.1 billion.

During the yearyears ended December 31, 2016,2019 and 2018 include the Company:
Repaid $440.8 millioneffect of 6.256% mortgageany derivative instruments and amortization of premiums/discounts/OCI (other comprehensive income) on debt held in a Fannie Mae loan pool maturing in 2017 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $29.3 million;
Repaid $65.5 million of various tax-exempt mortgage bonds maturing in 2026 through 2037 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $0.2 million;
Repaid $75.9 million of conventional fixed-rate mortgage loans and incurred prepayment penalties of approximately $2.2 million;
Repaid $0.9 million of conventional floating-rate mortgage loans;
Repaid $8.5 million of scheduled principal repayments on various mortgage debt; and
Assumed $43.4 million of mortgage debt on one acquired property.

The Company recorded $1.6 million of write-offs of unamortized deferred financing costs during the year ended December 31, 2016 as additional interest expense related to debt extinguishment of mortgages. The Company also recorded $20.7 million of write-offs of net unamortized premiums during the year ended December 31, 2016 as a reduction of interest expense related to debt extinguishment of mortgages.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $601.9 million of secured debt subject to third party credit enhancement.

As of December 31, 2016, scheduled maturities for the Company’s outstanding mortgage indebtedness were at various dates through May 28, 2061. At December 31, 2016, the interest rate range on the Company’s mortgage debt was 0.10% to 7.20%. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s mortgage debt was 4.34%.

The historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, of encumbered properties was $5.0 billion and $6.0 billion at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had outstanding mortgage debt of approximately $4.7 billion.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repaid $368.5 million of mortgage loans.

The Company recorded $0.6 million of write-offs of unamortized deferred financing costs during the year ended December 31, 2015 as additional interest expense related to debt extinguishment of mortgages. The Company also recorded $1.4 million of write-offs of net unamortized premiums during the year ended December 31, 2015 as a reduction of interest expense related to debt extinguishment of mortgages.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $668.8 million of secured debt subject to third party credit enhancement.

As of December 31, 2015, scheduled maturities for the Company’s outstanding mortgage indebtedness were at various dates through May 28, 2061. At December 31, 2015, the interest rate range on the Company’s mortgage debt was 0.01% to 7.25%. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s mortgage debt was 4.23%.

derivatives.    

Mortgage Notes


Payable

The following tables summarize the Company’s unsecured note balancesmortgage notes payable activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Mortgage notes

payable, net as of

December 31, 2018

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

Lump sum

payoffs

 

 

Scheduled

principal

repayments

 

 

Amortization

of premiums/

discounts

 

 

Amortization

of deferred

financing

costs, net (1)

 

 

Mortgage notes

payable, net as of

December 31, 2019

 

Fixed Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured – Conventional

 

$

1,885,407

 

 

$

288,120

 

(2)

$

(584,536

)

 

$

(6,308

)

 

$

(7,999

)

 

$

15

 

 

$

1,574,699

 

Floating Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured – Conventional

 

 

6,357

 

 

 

7,651

 

(3)

 

(5,920

)

 

 

(500

)

 

 

 

 

 

(538

)

 

 

7,050

 

Secured – Tax Exempt

 

 

493,706

 

 

 

 

 

 

(152,565

)

 

 

 

 

 

16,617

 

 

 

2,103

 

 

 

359,861

 

Floating Rate Debt

 

 

500,063

 

 

 

7,651

 

 

 

(158,485

)

 

 

(500

)

 

 

16,617

 

 

 

1,565

 

 

 

366,911

 

Total

 

$

2,385,470

 

 

$

295,771

 

 

$

(743,021

)

 

$

(6,808

)

 

$

8,618

 

 

$

1,580

 

 

$

1,941,610

 

(1)

Represents amortization of deferred financing costs, net of debt financing costs.

(2)

Obtained 3.94% fixed rate mortgage debt held in a Fannie Mae loan pool maturing on March 1, 2029.

(3)

Obtained variable rate construction mortgage debt that is non-recourse to the Company maturing on June 25, 2022 (total commitment of $67.6 million).

 

 

Mortgage notes

payable, net as of

December 31, 2017

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

Lump sum

payoffs

 

 

Scheduled

principal

repayments

 

 

Amortization

of premiums/

discounts

 

 

Amortization

of deferred

financing

costs, net (1)

 

 

Mortgage notes

payable, net as of

December 31, 2018

 

Fixed Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured – Conventional

 

$

2,982,344

 

 

$

 

 

$

(1,093,705

)

 

$

(6,029

)

 

$

719

 

 

$

2,078

 

 

$

1,885,407

 

Floating Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured – Conventional

 

 

6,948

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(600

)

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

6,357

 

Secured – Tax Exempt

 

 

629,430

 

 

 

96,935

 

(2)

 

(254,234

)

 

 

 

 

 

19,425

 

 

 

2,150

 

 

 

493,706

 

Floating Rate Debt

 

 

636,378

 

 

 

96,935

 

 

 

(254,234

)

 

 

(600

)

 

 

19,425

 

 

 

2,159

 

 

 

500,063

 

Total

 

$

3,618,722

 

 

$

96,935

 

 

$

(1,347,939

)

 

$

(6,629

)

 

$

20,144

 

 

$

4,237

 

 

$

2,385,470

 

(1)

Represents amortization of deferred financing costs, net of debt financing costs.  

(2)

Reissued floating rate tax-exempt mortgage bonds which mature on April 1, 2042, remarket weekly and are guaranteed by ERPOP.

The following table summarizes the Company’s debt extinguishment costs on mortgages recorded as additional interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (amounts in thousands):

Description

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Prepayment premiums/penalties

 

$

3,381

 

 

$

22,110

 

Write-offs of unamortized deferred financing costs

 

 

2,273

 

 

 

2,957

 

Write-offs of unamortized (premiums)/discounts/OCI

 

 

6,153

 

 

 

16,268

 

Total

 

$

11,807

 

 

$

41,335

 

F-41


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes certain interest rate and maturity date information as of and for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively:

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

Interest Rate Ranges

 

0.10% - 5.29%

 

 

0.10% - 6.90%

 

Weighted Average Interest Rate

 

3.84%

 

 

4.15%

 

Maturity Date Ranges

 

2020-2061

 

 

2019-2061

 

December 31, 2016
(Amounts in thousands)
 Net Principal Balance Interest Rate Ranges Weighted Average Interest Rate Maturity Date Ranges
Fixed Rate Public Notes (1) $4,397,829
 2.85% - 7.57% 4.90% 2017 - 2045
Floating Rate Public Notes (1) 450,250
 (1) 1.28% 2019
Totals $4,848,079
      


F-43

Table

As of ContentsDecember 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had $281.7 million and $440.7 million, respectively, of secured debt (primarily tax-exempt bonds) subject to third party credit enhancement.

The historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, of encumbered properties was $2.7 billion and $3.2 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Notes

The following tables summarize the Company’s notes activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Notes, net as of

December 31, 2018

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

Lump sum

payoffs

 

 

Realized/unrealized

(gain) loss on

derivative

instruments

 

 

Amortization

of premiums/

discounts

 

 

Amortization

of deferred

financing

costs, net (1)

 

 

Notes, net as of

December 31, 2019

 

Fixed Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured – Public

 

$

5,485,884

 

 

$

1,194,468

 

(2)

$

(600,000

)

 

$

 

 

$

3,117

 

 

$

(5,956

)

 

$

6,077,513

 

Floating Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured – Public

 

 

447,402

 

 

 

 

 

 

(450,000

)

 

 

2,277

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

276

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

5,933,286

 

 

$

1,194,468

 

 

$

(1,050,000

)

 

$

2,277

 

 

$

3,162

 

 

$

(5,680

)

 

$

6,077,513

 



December 31, 2015
(Amounts in thousands)
 Net Principal Balance Interest Rate Ranges Weighted Average Interest Rate Maturity Date Ranges
Fixed Rate Public Notes (1) $5,397,552
 3.00% - 7.57% 5.30% 2016 - 2045
Floating Rate Public Notes (1) 451,404
 (1) 0.93% 2019
Totals $5,848,956
      

(1)

Represents amortization of deferred financing costs, net of debt financing costs.

(1)

(2)

Issued $600.0 million of ten-year 3.00% unsecured notes, receiving net proceeds of approximately $597.5 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses.  Additionally, issued $600.0 million of ten-year 2.50% unsecured notes, receiving net proceeds of approximately $597.0 million before underwriting fees and other expenses.

 

 

Notes, net as of

December 31, 2017

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

Realized/unrealized

(gain) loss on

derivative

instruments

 

 

Amortization

of premiums/

discounts

 

 

Amortization

of deferred

financing

costs, net (1)

 

 

Notes, net as of

December 31, 2018

 

Fixed Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured – Public

 

$

4,591,373

 

 

$

896,294

 

(2)

$

 

 

$

2,547

 

 

$

(4,330

)

 

$

5,485,884

 

Floating Rate Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured – Public (3)

 

 

447,439

 

 

 

 

 

 

(680

)

 

 

90

 

 

 

553

 

 

 

447,402

 

Total

 

$

5,038,812

 

 

$

896,294

 

 

$

(680

)

 

$

2,637

 

 

$

(3,777

)

 

$

5,933,286

 

(1)

Represents amortization of deferred financing costs, net of debt financing costs.

(2)

Issued $500.0 million of ten-year 3.50% unsecured notes, receiving net proceeds of approximately $497.0 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses.  Additionally, issued $400.0 million of ten-year 4.15% unsecured notes, receiving net proceeds of approximately $399.3 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses.

(3)

Fair value interest rate swaps convertconverted the $450.0 million 2.375% notes due July 1, 2019 to a floating interest rate of 90-Day LIBOR plus 0.61%.

The following table summarizes the Company’s debt extinguishment costs on notes recorded as additional interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (amounts in thousands):


Description

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Prepayment premiums/penalties

 

$

10,266

 

 

$

 

Write-offs of unamortized deferred financing costs

 

 

287

 

 

 

 

Write-offs of unamortized (premiums)/discounts/OCI

 

 

1,043

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

11,596

 

 

$

 

F-42


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes certain interest rate and maturity date information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively:

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

Interest Rate Ranges

 

2.50% - 7.57%

 

 

2.85% - 7.57%

 

Weighted Average Interest Rate

 

4.21%

 

 

4.25%

 

Maturity Date Ranges

 

2021-2047

 

 

2019-2047

 

The Company’s unsecured public debt containsnotes contain certain financial and operating covenants including, among other things, maintenance of certain financial ratios.  The Company was in compliance with its unsecured public debt covenants for both the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015.


2018.

EQR and ERPOP currently have an active universal shelf registration statement for the issuance of equity and debt securities that automatically became effective upon filing with the SEC onin June 28, 20162019 and expires onin June 28, 2019. Per the terms of ERPOP’s partnership agreement, EQR contributes the net proceeds of all equity offerings to the capital of ERPOP in exchange for additional OP Units (on a one-for-one Common Share per OP Unit basis) or preference units (on a one-for-one preferred share per preference unit basis).


During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company:

Repaid $228.9 million of 5.125% unsecured notes maturing in 2016 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $1.4 million and repaid the remaining $271.1 million of 5.125% unsecured notes at maturity;
Repaid $400.0 million of 5.375% unsecured notes maturing in 2016 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $9.5 million;
Repaid $255.9 million of 5.750% unsecured notes maturing in 2017 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $16.5 million;
Repaid $46.1 million of 7.125% unsecured notes maturing in 2017 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $4.6 million;
Repaid $250.0 million of 4.625% unsecured notes maturing in 2021 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $31.6 million;
Repaid $48.0 million of 7.570% unsecured notes maturing in 2026 and incurred a prepayment penalty of approximately $19.3 million; and
Issued $500.0 million of ten-year 2.85% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $496.7 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of approximately 3.10% after termination of a forward starting swap in conjunction with the issuance (see Note 9 for further discussion).

The Company recorded $1.9 million of write-offs of unamortized deferred financing costs during the year ended December 31, 2016 as additional interest expense related to debt extinguishment of unsecured notes. The Company also recorded $25.2 million of write-offs of net unamortized premiums/discounts/OCI/treasury locks during the year ended December 31, 2016 as additional interest expense related to debt extinguishment of unsecured notes.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company:

Repaid $300.0 million of 6.584% unsecured notes at maturity;
Issued $450.0 million of ten-year 3.375% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $447.5 million before underwriting fees, hedge termination costs and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of 3.81% after termination of various forward starting swaps in conjunction with the issuance (see Note 9 for further discussion); and
Issued $300.0 million of thirty-year 4.50% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $298.9 million before underwriting fees and other expenses, at an all-in effective interest rate of 4.55%.

2022.    

Line of Credit and Commercial Paper


On November 3, 2016,1, 2019, the Company replaced its existing $2.5$2.0 billion facility with a $2.0$2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing January 10, 2022. November 1, 2024.  The Company has the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $750.0 million by adding additional bankslenders to the facility, or obtaining the agreement of existing bankslenders to increase their commitments.commitments or incurring one or more term loans.  The interest rate on advances under the facility will generally be LIBOR plus a spread (currently 0.825%0.775%), or based on bids received from the lending group, and the Company pays an annuala quarterly facility fee (currently 12.5 basis points). Both the spread and the facility


F-44


fee are dependent on the credit rating of the Company's long-term debt. The Company wrote off $0.4 million in unamortized deferred financing costs related to the old facility.

The Company's previous $2.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility was set to mature on April 2, 2018. The Company had the ability to increase available borrowings by an additional $500.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase their commitments. The interest rate on advances under the facility was generally LIBOR plus a spread (was 0.95% at termination), or based on bids received from the lending group, and the Company paid an annual facility fee (was 15 basis points at termination)0.125%).  Both the spread and the facility fee wereare dependent on the Company’s senior unsecured credit rating ofrating.  Weighted average interest rates on the Company's long-term debt.

revolving credit facility were 3.12% and 2.97% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The Company has an unsecuredcommercialpapernoteprogramintheUnitedStates.  On February 2, 2015,November 4, 2019, the Company entered into an unsecuredincreased the maximum aggregate amount outstanding for the commercial paper note program in the United States. The Company may borrow up to a maximum offrom $500.0 million under this program subject to market conditions.$1.0 billion.  The notes will be soldundercustomarytermsintheUnitedStatescommercialpapernotemarket subject to market conditions andwillrankparipassuwithallofthe Company'sCompany’s otherunsecuredseniorindebtedness.  As of December 31, 2016, there was a balance of $20.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program. As of December 31, 2015, there was a balance of $387.3 million on the commercial paper program ($387.5 million in principal outstanding net of an unamortized discount of $0.2 million). Thenotesbearinterest at various floating rates with a weighted average interest rate of 0.90%2.42% and 0.56%2.35% for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively, and a weighted average maturity of 440 days and 1922 days as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.


As of   The weighted average amount outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2016, the amount available on2019 and 2018 was approximately $434.4 million and $397.3 respectively.

The Company limits its utilization of the revolving credit facility was $1.96 billion (net of $20.6 million which was restricted/dedicatedin order to maintain liquidity to support lettersits $1.0 billion commercial paper program ($500.0 million at December 31, 2018) along with certain other obligations.  The following table presents the availability on the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

Unsecured revolving credit facility commitment

 

$

2,500,000

 

 

$

2,000,000

 

Commercial paper balance outstanding

 

 

(1,000,000

)

 

 

(500,000

)

Unsecured revolving credit facility balance outstanding

 

 

(20,000

)

 

 

 

Other restricted amounts

 

 

(100,929

)

 

 

(103,622

)

Unsecured revolving credit facility availability

 

$

1,379,071

 

 

$

1,396,378

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s debt extinguishment costs on the line of credit and net ofrecorded as additional interest expense during the $20.0 million outstanding on the commercial paper program). During the yearyears ended December 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 1.37%. As2019 and 2018, respectively (amounts in thousands):

Description

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Write-offs of unamortized deferred financing costs

 

$

588

 

 

$

 

Total

 

$

588

 

 

$

 

F-43


Table of December 31, 2015, the amount available on the revolving credit facility was $2.07 billion (net of $45.1 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and net of the $387.5 million outstanding on the commercial paper program). During the year ended December 31, 2015, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 1.07%.



Contents

Debt Maturity Table

The following table provides a summary of the aggregate payments of principal on all debt for each of the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 20162019 (amounts in thousands):

Year

 

Total

 

2020 (1)

 

$

1,027,542

 

2021

 

 

926,404

 

2022

 

 

271,835

 

2023

 

 

1,329,088

 

2024

 

 

26,100

 

Thereafter

 

 

5,550,010

 

Subtotal

 

 

9,130,979

 

Deferred Financing Costs and Unamortized (Discount)

 

 

(94,023

)

Total

 

$

9,036,956

 

Year Total
2017 $628,458
2018 184,369
2019 1,286,037
2020 1,690,090
2021 941,157
Thereafter 4,366,516
Deferred Financing Costs (42,617)
Net Unamortized (Discount) (66,752)
Total $8,987,258


(1)

Includes $1.0 billion in principal outstanding on the Company’s commercial paper program.

9.

10.

Derivative and Other Fair Value Instruments


The valuation of financial instruments requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments.  The Company, where possible, bases the fair values of its financial instruments, including its derivative instruments, on listed market prices and third party quotes.  Where these are not available, the Company bases its estimates on current instruments with similar terms and maturities or on other factors relevant to the financial instruments.


In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes.  The Company seeksmay seek to manage these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments.  The Company may also use derivatives to manage commodity prices in the daily operations of the business.


A three-level valuation hierarchy exists for disclosure of fair value measurements.  The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.  A financial instrument’s categorization


F-45


within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.


Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company’s derivative positions are valued using models developed by the respective counterparty as well as models developedapplied internally by the Company that use as their basisinputs readily observable market parameters (such as forward yield curves and credit default swap data).  Employee holdings other than Common Shares within the supplemental executive retirement plan (the “SERP”) are valued using quoted market prices for identical assets and are included in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.  Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership/Redeemable Limited Partners are valued using the quoted market price of Common Shares.  The fair values disclosed for mortgage notes payable and unsecured debt (including its commercial paper)paper and line of credit, if applicable) were calculated using indicative rates provided by lenders of similar loans in the case of mortgage notes payable and the private unsecured debt (including its commercial paper)paper and line of credit, if applicable) and quoted market prices for each underlying issuance in the case of the public unsecured notes.



value.  The following table summarizesprovides a summary of the carrying and fair values for the Company’s consolidated derivative instrumentsmortgage notes payable and unsecured debt (including its commercial paper and line of credit, if applicable) at December 31, 2016 (dollar amounts are2019 and 2018, respectively (amounts in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Estimated Fair

Value (Level 2)

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Estimated Fair

Value (Level 2)

 

Mortgage notes payable, net

 

$

1,941,610

 

 

$

1,930,710

 

 

$

2,385,470

 

 

$

2,352,502

 

Unsecured debt, net

 

 

7,095,346

 

 

 

7,677,289

 

 

 

6,432,469

 

 

 

6,481,426

 

Total debt, net

 

$

9,036,956

 

 

$

9,607,999

 

 

$

8,817,939

 

 

$

8,833,928

 

  Fair Value
Hedges (1)
Current Notional Balance $450,000
Indicative Interest Rate 2.375%
Maturity Date 2019
(1)
Fair Value Hedges – Converts outstanding fixed rate unsecured notes ($450.0 million 2.375%notes due July 1, 2019) to a floating interest rate of 90-Day LIBOR plus 0.61%.

The following tables provide a summary of the fair value measurements for each major category of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the location within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

Description

 

Balance Sheet

Location

 

12/31/2019

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets/Liabilities

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

 

Other Assets

 

$

151,889

 

 

$

151,889

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

 

Other Liabilities

 

$

151,889

 

 

$

151,889

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Partnership/Redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited Partners

 

Mezzanine

 

$

463,400

 

 

$

 

 

$

463,400

 

 

$

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 

Description

 

Balance Sheet

Location

 

12/31/2018

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets/Liabilities

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives designated as hedging

   instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward Starting Swaps

 

Other Assets

 

$

2,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,000

 

 

$

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

 

Other Assets

 

 

134,088

 

 

 

134,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

136,088

 

 

$

134,088

 

 

$

2,000

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives designated as hedging

   instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Hedges

 

Other Liabilities

 

$

2,277

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,277

 

 

$

 

Forward Starting Swaps

 

Other Liabilities

 

 

9,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,851

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

 

Other Liabilities

 

 

134,088

 

 

 

134,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

146,216

 

 

$

134,088

 

 

$

12,128

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Partnership/Redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited Partners

 

Mezzanine

 

$

379,106

 

 

$

 

 

$

379,106

 

 

$

 

F-46

F-45



      Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description Balance Sheet Location 12/31/2016 Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets/Liabilities
(Level 1)
 Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets          
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:         
   Interest Rate Contracts:         
Fair Value HedgesOther Assets $1,857
 $
 $1,857
 $
Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanOther Assets 124,420
 124,420
 
 
Total   $126,277
 $124,420
 $1,857
 $
           
Liabilities          
Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanOther Liabilities $124,420
 $124,420
 $
 $
Total   $124,420
 $124,420
 $
 $
           
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests –         
   Operating Partnership/Redeemable         
      Limited PartnersMezzanine $442,092
 $
 $442,092
 $

      Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description Balance Sheet Location 12/31/2015 Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets/Liabilities
(Level 1)
 Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets          
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:         
   Interest Rate Contracts:         
Fair Value Hedges Other Assets $3,655
 $
 $3,655
 $
Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanOther Assets 105,942
 105,942
 
 
Total   $109,597
 $105,942
 $3,655
 $
           
Liabilities          
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:         
   Interest Rate Contracts:         
      Forward Starting SwapsOther Liabilities $673
 $
 $673
 $
Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanOther Liabilities 105,942
 105,942
 
 
Total   $106,615
 $105,942
 $673
 $
           
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests –         
   Operating Partnership/Redeemable         
      Limited PartnersMezzanine $566,783
 $
 $566,783
 $

The following tables provide a summary of the effect of fair value hedges on the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively (amounts in thousands):

December 31, 2019

Type of Fair Value Hedge

 

Location of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income on

Derivative

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income on

Derivative

 

 

Hedged Item

 

Income Statement

Location of

Hedged Item

Gain/(Loss)

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income

on Hedged Item

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

Interest expense

 

$

2,277

 

 

Fixed rate debt

 

Interest expense

 

$

(2,277

)

Total

 

 

 

$

2,277

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2,277

)

December 31, 2018

Type of Fair Value Hedge

 

Location of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income on

Derivative

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income on

Derivative

 

 

Hedged Item

 

Income Statement

Location of

Hedged Item

Gain/(Loss)

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income

on Hedged Item

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

Interest expense

 

$

(680

)

 

Fixed rate debt

 

Interest expense

 

$

680

 

Total

 

 

 

$

(680

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

680

 

December 31, 2017

Type of Fair Value Hedge

 

Location of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income on

Derivative

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income on

Derivative

 

 

Hedged Item

 

Income Statement

Location of

Hedged Item

Gain/(Loss)

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income

on Hedged Item

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

Interest expense

 

$

(3,454

)

 

Fixed rate debt

 

Interest expense

 

$

3,454

 

Total

 

 

 

$

(3,454

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,454

 

December 31, 2016
Type of Fair Value Hedge
 Location of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
 Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
 Hedged Item Income Statement
Location of
Hedged Item
Gain/(Loss)
 Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in
Income
on Hedged Item
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:    
      
Interest Rate Contracts:    
      
Interest Rate Swaps Interest expense $(1,798) Fixed rate debt Interest expense $1,798
Total   $(1,798)     $1,798


F-47


December 31, 2015
Type of Fair Value Hedge
 Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Hedged Item Income Statement Location of Hedged Item Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss)Recognized in Income
on Hedged Item
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:    
      
Interest Rate Contracts:    
      
Interest Rate Swaps Interest expense $2,058
 Fixed rate debt Interest expense $(2,058)
Total   $2,058
     $(2,058)

December 31, 2014
Type of Fair Value Hedge
 Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Hedged Item Income Statement Location of Hedged Item Gain/(Loss) Amount of Gain/(Loss)Recognized in Income
on Hedged Item
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:    
      
Interest Rate Contracts:    
      
Interest Rate Swaps Interest expense $1,597
 Fixed rate debt Interest expense $(1,597)
Total   $1,597
     $(1,597)

The following tables provide a summary of the effect of cash flow hedges on the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Effective Portion

 

December 31, 2019

Type of Cash Flow Hedge

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in OCI

on Derivative

 

 

Location of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated OCI

into Income

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated

OCI into Income

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward Starting Swaps

 

$

(33,765

)

 

Interest expense

 

$

(21,188

)

Total

 

$

(33,765

)

 

 

 

$

(21,188

)

 

 

Effective Portion

 

 

Ineffective Portion

 

December 31, 2018

Type of Cash Flow Hedge

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in OCI

on Derivative

 

 

Location of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated OCI

into Income

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated

OCI into Income

 

 

Location of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income on

Derivative

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated

OCI into Income

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward Starting Swaps

 

$

5,124

 

 

Interest expense

 

$

(18,452

)

 

N/A

 

$

 

Total

 

$

5,124

 

 

 

 

$

(18,452

)

 

 

 

$

 

F-46


Table of Contents

 

 

Effective Portion

 

 

Ineffective Portion

 

December 31, 2017

Type of Cash Flow Hedge

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in OCI

on Derivative

 

 

Location of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated OCI

into Income

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated

OCI into Income

 

 

Location of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Income on

Derivative

 

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

Accumulated

OCI into Income

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward Starting Swaps

 

$

6,439

 

 

Interest expense

 

$

(18,858

)

 

N/A

 

$

 

Total

 

$

6,439

 

 

 

 

$

(18,858

)

 

 

 

$

 

  Effective Portion Ineffective Portion
December 31, 2016
Type of Cash Flow Hedge
 Amount of
Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
 Location of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
 Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
 Location of
Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
 Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
    
    
Interest Rate Contracts:  
    
    
Forward Starting Swaps $(3,989) Interest expense $(41,758) Interest expense $(74)
Total $(3,989)   $(41,758)   $(74)
  Effective Portion Ineffective Portion
December 31, 2015
Type of Cash Flow Hedge
 Amount of
Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
 Location of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
 Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
 Location of
Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
 Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:          
Interest Rate Contracts:          
Forward Starting Swaps $(814) Interest expense $(18,244) Interest expense $(3,033)
Total $(814)   $(18,244)   $(3,033)

  Effective Portion Ineffective Portion
December 31, 2014
Type of Cash Flow Hedge
 Amount of
Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
 Location of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
 Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
 Location of
Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
 Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:          
Interest Rate Contracts:          
Forward Starting Swaps $(33,215) Interest expense $(16,868) Interest expense $91
Total $(33,215)   $(16,868)   $91

As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, there were approximately $113.9$77.6 million and $151.8$65.0 million in deferred losses, net, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), respectively, related to derivative instruments. Based on the estimated fair valuesinstruments, of the net derivative instruments at December 31, 2016, the Company may recognizewhich an estimated $21.9$24.9 million of accumulated other comprehensive (loss)may be recognized as additional interest expense during the yeartwelve months ending December 31, 2017.


F-48



$450.0 million of 2.375% unsecured notes.

In October 2016,June 2019, the Company paid $4.7approximately $41.8 million to settle a10 forward starting ten-year swapswaps in conjunction with the issuance of $500.0$600.0 million of ten-year fixed rate unsecured public notes.  The ineffective portion of approximately $74,000 and accrued interest of approximately $9,000 were$0.2 million was recorded as increasesan increase to interest expense. The remaining amount of approximately $4.6$41.6 million will be deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized as an increase to interest expense over the approximate term of the notes.


In May 2015, the Company paid a net $15.1 million to settle nine forward starting ten-year swaps in conjunction with the issuance of $450.0 million of ten-year fixed rate public notes. The ineffective portion of approximately $30,000 and accrued interest of approximately $1.2 million were recorded as increases to interest expense. The remaining amount of approximately $13.9 million will be deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) and recognized as an increase to interest expense over the first 9 years and 10.5 months of the notes.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded approximately $3.0 million of deferred accumulated other comprehensive (loss) as additional interest expense due to the ineffectiveness of certain forward starting swaps.

In June 2014, the Company paid a net $2.0 million to settle seven forward starting ten-year swaps in conjunction with the issuance of $750.0 million of thirty-year fixed rate public notes. The ineffective portion of approximately $0.1 million was recorded as a decrease to interest expense and accrued interest of approximately $1.3 million was recorded as an increase to interest expense. The remaining amount of approximately $0.8 million will be deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) and recognized as an increase to interest expense over the first nine years and teneleven months of the notes.


10.Earnings Per Share

In November 2018, the Company received approximately $16.4 million to settle 6 forward starting swaps in conjunction with the issuance of $400.0 million of ten-year unsecured public notes.  The accrued interest of approximately $120,000 was recorded as an increase to interest expense. The remaining $16.5 million will be deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and Earnings Per Unitwill be recognized as a decrease to interest expense over the first nine years and nine months of the notes.

In February 2018, the Company received approximately $1.6 million to settle 2 forward starting swaps in conjunction with the issuance of $500.0 million of ten-year unsecured public notes.  The entire $1.6 million was initially deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and will be recognized as a decrease to interest expense over the ten-year term of the notes.

In August 2017, the Company received $1.3 million to settle 4 forward starting swaps in conjunction with the issuance of $400.0 million of ten-year fixed rate public notes.  The entire $1.3 million was initially deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and will be recognized as a decrease to interest expense over the ten-year term of the notes.

F-47


Table of Contents

11.

Earnings Per Share and Earnings Per Unit


Equity Residential


The following tables set forth the computation of net income per share – basic and net income per share – diluted for the Company (amounts in thousands except per share amounts):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Numerator for net income per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

Allocation to Noncontrolling Interests – Operating

   Partnership

 

 

(36,034

)

 

 

(24,939

)

 

 

(22,604

)

Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling

    Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(3,297

)

 

 

(2,718

)

 

 

(2,323

)

Preferred distributions

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,091

)

Numerator for net income per share – basic

 

$

967,287

 

 

$

654,445

 

 

$

600,363

 

Numerator for net income per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling

    Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(3,297

)

 

 

(2,718

)

 

 

(2,323

)

Preferred distributions

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,091

)

Numerator for net income per share – diluted

 

$

1,003,321

 

 

$

679,384

 

 

$

622,967

 

Denominator for net income per share – basic and diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for net income per share – basic

 

 

370,461

 

 

 

368,052

 

 

 

366,968

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OP Units

 

 

12,907

 

 

 

12,869

 

 

 

12,901

 

Long-term compensation shares/units

 

 

2,965

 

 

 

2,774

 

 

 

2,809

 

Denominator for net income per share – diluted

 

 

386,333

 

 

 

383,695

 

 

 

382,678

 

Net income per share – basic

 

$

2.61

 

 

$

1.78

 

 

$

1.64

 

Net income per share – diluted

 

$

2.60

 

 

$

1.77

 

 

$

1.63

 


F-49


 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Numerator for net income per share – basic: 
  
  
Income from continuing operations$4,479,586
 $907,621
 $657,101
Allocation to Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership, net(171,491) (34,226) (24,771)
Net (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties(16,430) (3,657) (2,544)
Preferred distributions(3,091) (3,357) (4,145)
Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares
 (3,486) 
Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares, net of
  Noncontrolling Interests
4,288,574
 862,895
 625,641
Discontinued operations, net of Noncontrolling Interests498
 382
 1,522
Numerator for net income per share – basic$4,289,072
 $863,277
 $627,163
Numerator for net income per share – diluted:     
Income from continuing operations$4,479,586
 $907,621
 $657,101
Net (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties(16,430) (3,657) (2,544)
Preferred distributions(3,091) (3,357) (4,145)
Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares
 (3,486) 
Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares4,460,065
 897,121
 650,412
Discontinued operations, net518
 397
 1,582
Numerator for net income per share – diluted$4,460,583
 $897,518
 $651,994
Denominator for net income per share – basic and diluted:     
Denominator for net income per share – basic365,002
 363,498
 361,181
Effect of dilutive securities:     
OP Units13,827
 13,576
 13,718
Long-term compensation shares/units3,163
 3,546
 2,836
Denominator for net income per share – diluted381,992
 380,620
 377,735
Net income per share – basic$11.75
 $2.37
 $1.74
Net income per share – diluted$11.68
 $2.36
 $1.73
Net income per share – basic: 
  
  
Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares, net of
Noncontrolling Interests
$11.75
 $2.37
 $1.73
Discontinued operations, net of Noncontrolling Interests
 
 0.01
Net income per share – basic$11.75
 $2.37
 $1.74
Net income per share – diluted: 
  
  
Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares$11.68
 $2.36
 $1.72
Discontinued operations, net
 
 0.01
Net income per share – diluted$11.68
 $2.36
 $1.73
Note: For additional disclosures regarding the employee share options and restricted shares, see Notes 2 and 12.

ERP Operating Limited Partnership


The following tables set forth the computation of net income per Unit – basic and net income per Unit – diluted for the Operating Partnership (amounts in thousands except per Unit amounts):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Numerator for net income per Unit – basic and diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,009,708

 

 

$

685,192

 

 

$

628,381

 

Net (income) loss attributable to Noncontrolling Interests –

   Partially Owned Properties

 

 

(3,297

)

 

 

(2,718

)

 

 

(2,323

)

Allocation to Preference Units

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,090

)

 

 

(3,091

)

Numerator for net income per Unit – basic and diluted

 

$

1,003,321

 

 

$

679,384

 

 

$

622,967

 

Denominator for net income per Unit – basic and diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for net income per Unit – basic

 

 

383,368

 

 

 

380,921

 

 

 

379,869

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dilution for Units issuable upon assumed exercise/vesting

    of the Company’s long-term compensation shares/units

 

 

2,965

 

 

 

2,774

 

 

 

2,809

 

Denominator for net income per Unit – diluted

 

 

386,333

 

 

 

383,695

 

 

 

382,678

 

Net income per Unit – basic

 

$

2.61

 

 

$

1.78

 

 

$

1.64

 

Net income per Unit – diluted

 

$

2.60

 

 

$

1.77

 

 

$

1.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


F-50


 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Numerator for net income per Unit – basic and diluted: 
  
  
Income from continuing operations$4,479,586
 $907,621
 $657,101
Net (income) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned Properties(16,430) (3,657) (2,544)
Allocation to Preference Units(3,091) (3,357) (4,145)
Allocation to premium on redemption of Preference Units
 (3,486) 
Income from continuing operations available to Units4,460,065
 897,121
 650,412
Discontinued operations, net518
 397
 1,582
Numerator for net income per Unit – basic and diluted$4,460,583
 $897,518
 $651,994
Denominator for net income per Unit – basic and diluted:     
Denominator for net income per Unit – basic378,829
 377,074
 374,899
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Dilution for Units issuable upon assumed exercise/vesting of the Company's
    long-term compensation shares/units
3,163
 3,546
 2,836
Denominator for net income per Unit – diluted381,992
 380,620
 377,735
Net income per Unit – basic$11.75
 $2.37
 $1.74
Net income per Unit – diluted$11.68
 $2.36
 $1.73
Net income per Unit – basic: 
  
  
Income from continuing operations available to Units$11.75
 $2.37
 $1.73
Discontinued operations, net
 
 0.01
Net income per Unit – basic$11.75
 $2.37
 $1.74
Net income per Unit – diluted: 
  
  
Income from continuing operations available to Units$11.68
 $2.36
 $1.72
Discontinued operations, net
 
 0.01
Net income per Unit – diluted$11.68
 $2.36
 $1.73
Note: For additional disclosures regarding the employee share options and restricted shares, see Notes 2 and 12.

12.

11.Individually Significant Dispositions and Discontinued Operations

In April 2014, the FASB issued new guidance for reporting discontinued operations. Only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations that has a major effect on a company’s operations and financial results will be presented as discontinued operations. Companies are required to expand their disclosures about discontinued operations to provide more information on the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the discontinued operations. Companies are also required to disclose the pre-tax income attributable to a disposal of a significant part of a company that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. Application of this guidance is prospective from the date of adoption and early adoption was permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that had not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The new standard was effective January 1, 2015, but the Company early adopted it as allowed effective January 1, 2014. Adoption of this standard resulted in and will likely continue to result in substantially fewer of the Company's dispositions meeting the discontinued operations qualifications.

Individually Significant Dispositions

The Company concluded that the Starwood Transaction does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting as it does not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. The Company has been investing only in its six coastal markets (Boston, New York, Washington D.C., Southern California, San Francisco and Seattle) and has not been acquiring or developing any new assets in its other markets. Over the past several years, the Company has been repositioning its portfolio by selling its suburban assets located in markets outside its six core coastal markets. However, the Company concluded that the Starwood Transaction does qualify as an individually significant component of the Company as the amount received upon disposal exceeded 10% of total assets and NOI (see definition in Note 17) of the Starwood Portfolio represents approximately 1.2% (for the approximate one-month period owned in 2016), 15.7% and 15.4%, respectively, of consolidated NOI for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. In addition, the Starwood Transaction met the held for sale criteria at December 31, 2015 and was classified as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2015 (see Note 4 for further discussion). In accordance with this classification, the Company ceased

F-51


depreciation on all assets in the Starwood Portfolio as of November 1, 2015. As a result, the following table summarizes the results of operations attributable to the Starwood Transaction for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
REVENUES 
  
  
Rental income$30,785
 $427,433
 $401,134
Total revenues30,785
 427,433
 401,134
      
EXPENSES (1) 
  
  
Property and maintenance7,838
 78,189
 76,579
Real estate taxes and insurance2,912
 48,403
 46,416
Property management2
 11
 11
General and administrative23
 38
 24
Depreciation
 87,616
 104,104
Total expenses10,775
 214,257
 227,134
      
Operating income20,010
 213,176
 174,000
      
Interest and other income21
 1
 1
Other expenses
 (35) (1)
Interest (2):     
Expense incurred, net(380) (680) (701)
Amortization of deferred financing costs(707) (559) (98)
Income and other tax (expense) benefit(1) (1) (3)
Net gain on sales of real estate properties3,161,097
 
 
      
Income from operations3,180,040
 211,902
 173,198
Income from operations attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Partially Owned
Properties

 
 (14)
Income from operations attributable to controlling interests – Operating Partnership3,180,040
 211,902
 173,184
Income from operations attributable to Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership(122,152) (8,083) (6,598)
Income from operations attributable to controlling interests – Company$3,057,888
 $203,819
 $166,586
(1)Includes expenses paid in the current period for properties held for sale.
(2)Includes only interest expense specific to secured mortgage notes payable for properties held for sale which was repaid at or before closing.

Discontinued Operations

The Company has presented separately as discontinued operations in all periods the results of operations for all consolidated assets disposed of and all properties held for sale, if any, for properties sold in 2013 and prior years. The amounts included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 represent trailing activity for properties sold in 2013 and prior years. None of the properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 met the new criteria for reporting discontinued operations.

The components of discontinued operations are outlined below and include the results of operations for the respective periods that the Company owned such assets for properties sold in 2013 and prior years during each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands).


F-52


 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
REVENUES 
  
  
Rental income$355
 $499
 $1,309
Total revenues355
 499
 1,309
      
EXPENSES (1) 
  
  
Property and maintenance(46) (60) (141)
Real estate taxes and insurance(461) 65
 267
General and administrative119
 85
 89
Total expenses(388) 90
 215
      
Discontinued operating income743
 409
 1,094
      
Interest and other income24
 3
 317
Other expenses(280) 
 
Income and other tax (expense) benefit(12) (15) (8)
      
Discontinued operations475
 397
 1,403
Net gain on sales of discontinued operations43
 
 179
      
Discontinued operations, net$518
 $397
 $1,582
(1)Includes expenses paid in the current period for properties sold in prior periods related to the Company’s period of ownership.

11.
12.

Share Incentive Plans


Any Common Shares issued pursuant to EQR'sEQR’s incentive equity compensation and employee share purchase plans will result in ERPOP issuing OP Units to EQR on a one-for-one basis with ERPOP receiving the net cash proceeds of such issuances.


On June 16, 2011,  See Note 2 for additional information regarding the shareholdersCompany’s share-based compensation.

F-48


Table of EQR approved the Company's 2011Contents

Overview of Share Incentive Plans

The 2019 Share Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”), as amended (the "2011 Plan"). The 2011 Plan originally reserved 12,980,741approved by the Company’s shareholders on June 27, 2019, expires on June 27, 2029 and reserves 11,331,958 Common Shares for issuance, which was subsequently adjusted to 14,725,321 Common Shares in accordance with the provisions of the 2011 Plan as a result of the option adjustments required for the special dividends paid in conjunction with the Starwood Transaction. In conjunction with the approval of the 2011 Plan, no furtherissuance.  All future awards maywill be granted under the 2002 Share Incentive2019 Plan. The 2011 Plan expires on June 16, 2021.  As of December 31, 2016, 8,595,5532019, 11,328,266 shares were available for future issuance.


Pursuant to the 2019 Plan, the 2011 Share Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) and the 2002 Share Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”), as restated and amended (collectively the “Share Incentive Plans”), officers, trustees, and key employees and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries may be granted share options to acquire Common Shares (“Options”), including non-qualified share options (“NQSOs”), incentive share options (“ISOs”) and share appreciation rights (“SARs”), or may be granted restricted or non-restricted shares/units (including performance-basedlong-term incentive plan awards), subject to conditions and restrictions as described in the Share Incentive Plans.restrictions.  Options, SARs, restricted shares (including performance awards) and restricted units (including performance awards) are sometimes collectively referred to herein as “Awards”.


The Options are generally granted at2011 Plan and the fair market value of the Company’s Common Shares at the date of grant, vest in three equal installments over a three-year period, are exercisable upon vesting and expire ten years from the date of grant (see additional valuation discussion in Note 2). The exercise price for all Options under the Share Incentive Plans is equal to the fair market value of the underlying Common Shares at the time the Option is granted. Options exercised result in new Common Shares being issued on the open market. The 2002 Share Incentive Plan, as restated and amended, will both terminate at such time aswhen all outstanding Awards have expired or have been exercised/vested.  The Board of Trustees may at any time amend or terminate the Share Incentive Plans, but termination will not affect Awards previously granted.granted, absent immediate vesting and cash settlement.  Any Options which had vested prior to such a termination would remain exercisable by the holder.


Restricted shares are

Employee Long-Term Compensation Awards

The following table summarizes the terms of Awards generally granted at the fair market value of the Company's Common Shares at the date of grant. Restricted shares that have been awarded through December 31, 2016 generally vest three years from the award date. In addition, the Company’s unvested restricted shareholders have the same voting rights as any other Common Share holder. During the three-year period of restriction, the Company’s unvested restricted shareholders receive quarterly dividend payments on their shares at the same rate and on the same date as any other Common Share holder. As a result, dividends paid on unvestedto employees:

Options

Restricted Shares

Restricted Units

Overview

Options exercised after vesting result in issuance of new Common Shares.

Restricted shareholders generally have the same voting rights and receive quarterly dividend payments on their shares at the same rate and on the same date as any other Common Share holder (1).

When certain conditions are met, restricted units convert into an equal number of OP Units, which the holder may exchange for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis or at the option of the Company the cash value of such shares. Restricted unitholders receive quarterly distribution payments on their restricted units at the same rate and on the same date as any other OP Unit holder (1).

Grant/Exercise

Price

Granted at the fair market value of Common Shares as of the grant date.

Granted at the fair market value of Common Shares as of the grant date.

Granted at varying discount rates to the fair market value of Common Shares as of the grant date (2).

Vesting Period

In three equal installments over a three-year period from the grant date.

Three years from the grant date.

Three years from the grant date.

Expiration

Ten years from the grant date.

Not applicable.

Ten years from the grant date (2).

Upon Employee

Termination

Unvested options are canceled.

Unvested restricted shares are canceled.

Unvested restricted units are canceled.


(1)

Dividends/distributions paid on unvested restricted shares and units are included as a component of retained earnings and Noncontrolling Interest – Operating Partnership/Limited Partners Capital, respectively, and have not been considered in reducing net income available to Common Shares/Units in a manner similar to the Company’s preferred share/preference unit dividends for the earnings per share/Unit calculation.

F-53

(2)

A restricted unit will automatically convert to an OP Unit when the capital account of each restricted unit increases (“books-up”) to a specified target.  The probability of a book-up occurring within the ten-year contractual life along with the liquidity risk associated with various hold period restrictions are both reflected in the discount.  If the capital target is not attained within ten years following the date of issuance, the restricted unit will automatically be canceled and no compensation will be payable to the holder of such canceled restricted unit.  If the capital target is attained and the restricted unit is converted to an OP Unit, it will not expire.

F-49



are included as a component of retained earnings (included in general partner's capital in the Operating Partnership's financial statements) and have not been considered in reducing net income available to Common Shares/Units in a manner similar to the

Long Term Incentive Plan

The Company’s preferred share/preference unit dividends for the earnings per share/Unit calculation. If employment is terminated prior to the lapsing of the restriction, the shares are generally canceled.


Restricted units are a class of partnership interests that under certain conditions, including vesting, are convertible by the holder into an equal number of OP Units, which are redeemable by the holder for Common Shares on a one-for-one basis or the cash value of such shares at the option of the Company. In connection with the grant of long-term incentive compensation for services provided during a year, officers of the Company are allowed to choose between restricted shares and restricted units. In January 2011, March 2014 and June 2015, certain holders of restricted shares converted these shares into restricted units. Similar to restricted shares, restricted units are generally granted at the fair market value of the Company's Common Shares at the date of grant and generally vest three years from the award date. In addition, restricted unit holders receive quarterly dividend payments on their restricted units at the same rate and on the same date as any other OP Unit holder. As a result, dividends paid on restricted units are included as a component of Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership/Limited Partners' capital and have not been considered in reducing net income available to Common Shares/Units in a manner similar to the Company’s preferred share/preference unit dividends for the earnings per share/Unit calculation. If employment is terminated prior to vesting, the restricted units are generally canceled. A restricted unit will automatically convert to an OP Unit when the capital account of each restricted unit increases (“books-up”) to a specified target. If the capital target is not attained within ten years following the date of issuance, the restricted unit will automatically be canceled and no compensation will be payable to the holder of such canceled restricted unit.
In January 2015, the Company revised its executive compensation program forallows the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and certain other Executive Officers. The long-term portion of the revised program will allow these individualsOfficers to earn from 0% to 200% of the target number of performancelong-term incentive (“LTI”) awards, payable in the form of restricted shares and/or restricted units, as determined by theunits.  The Company’s relative and absolute Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) and Normalized Funds from Operations (“FFO”) results over a forward-looking three-year performance period. The Company’s TSR will beperiod determine the restricted shares and/or restricted units awarded and are compared to pre-established quantitative performance metrics. In connection with the grant of long-term incentive compensation, the individuals are allowed to choose between restricted shares and restricted units.   The grant date fair value of the awards is estimated using a Monte Carlo model for the TSR portion of the awards and the resulting expense is recorded over the service period regardless of whether the TSR performance measures are achieved ifand the required serviceNormalized FFO portion of the awards is delivered. These awards generally vest three years fromadjusted based on the award date. The grant date fair value is amortized into expense over the service period.final achievement obtained.  If the executive is retirement-eligible, the grant date fair value is amortized into expense over the first year.  All other awards are amortized into expense over the three year performance/performance and vesting period. In addition, the awards granted as

The LTI participants receive distributions on only restricted units will receive quarterly partial dividend paymentsawarded equal to 10% of any common share dividend on the same date as any other OP Unit holder during the three-year performance period. As a result, dividendsquarterly distributions paid on restricted units are included as a component of Noncontrolling Interests – Operating Partnership/Limited Partners' capital and have not been considered in reducing net income available to Common Shares/OP Units in a manner similar to the Company’s preferred share/preference unit dividends for the earnings per share/Unit calculation. The awards granted as restricted shares will not receive dividends during the three-year performance period.  At the end of the three-year performance period, cumulative dividends will be paid for the three-year performance period for anyLTI participants receive dividends/distributions actually earned on restricted shares or restricted units actually earned,awarded during the performance period, less any dividendsdistributions already paid on the restricted units.No payout would be made for any return below 50% of the target performance metric.  If employment is terminated prior to vesting, the restricted shares and restricted units are generally canceled.  Once the Company's absolute and relative TSR is calculated at the end of the three-year performance period, the executive will earn a certain number of restricted shares and/or restricted units.  No payout would be made for any return below 50% of the target performance metric.


Trustees

All Trustees, with the exception of the Company's non-executiveCompany’s Chairman and employee Trustees, are granted options,Options, restricted shares and/or restricted units that vest one-year from the grant date that corresponds to the term for which he or she has been elected to serve.  Since 2016, the Chairman has only received awards under the LTI plan (see further discussion above).

Retirement Benefits

The non-executive Chairman's grants vest over the same term or period as all other employees.

The Company'sCompany’s Share Incentive Plans provide for certain benefits upon retirement.  For employees hired prior to January 1, 2009,The following table summarizes the terms of each retirement generally means the termination of employment (other than for cause): (i) on or after age 62; or (ii) prior to age 62 after meeting the requirements of the Rule of 70 (described below). For employees hired after January 1, 2009, retirement generally means the termination of employment (other than for cause) after meeting the requirements of the Rule of 70. For Trustees, retirement generally means termination of service on the Board (other than for cause) on or after age 72.eligibility category.

Age 62 for Employees

Rule of 70 for Employees

Age 72 for Trustees

Eligibility

For employees hired prior to January 1, 2009 and who were age 59 or older as of February 1, 2019.

All employees (1).

All non-employee Trustees.

Effect on unvested restricted shares,

restricted units and Options

Awards immediately vest and Options continue to be exercisable for the balance of the applicable ten-year option period.

Awards continue to vest per the original vesting schedule, subject to certain conditions, and Options continue to be exercisable for the balance of the applicable ten-year option period.

Awards immediately vest and Options continue to be exercisable for the balance of the applicable ten-year option period.

Effect on LTI Plan

Awards are prorated in proportion to the number of days worked in the first year of the three-year performance period and the individual does not receive any payout of shares or units until the final payout is determined at the end of the three-year performance period.


(1)

The Rule of 70 is met when an employee’s years of service with the Company (which must be at least 15 years) plus his or her age (which must be at least 55 years) on the date of termination equals or exceeds 70 years.  In addition, the employee must give the Company at least six months’ advance written notice of his or her intention to retire along with agreeing to certain other conditions.

The Rule of 70 is met when an employee’s years of service with the Company (which must be at least 15 years) plus his or her age (which must be at least 55 years) on the date of termination equals or exceeds 70 years. In addition, the employee must give the Company at least 6 months’ advance written notice of his or her intention to retire and sign a release upon termination of employment, releasing the Company from customary claims and agreeing to ongoing non-competition and employee non-solicitation provisions.


F-54


Under the Company'sCompany’s definitions of retirement, severalsome of its executive officers including its Chief Executive Officer, and its non-executive Chairman are retirement eligible.


For employees hired prior to January 1, 2009 who retire at or after age 62 (or for Trustees who retire at or after age 72), such employee’s or Trustee's unvested restricted shares, restricted units

F-50


Table of Contents

Compensation Expense and share options would immediately vest, and share options would continue to be exercisable for the balance of the applicable ten-year option period, as is provided under the Share Incentive Plans. For all other employees (those hired after January 1, 2009 and those hired before such date who choose to retire prior to age 62), upon such retirement under the Rule of 70 definition of retirement of employees, such employee’s unvested restricted shares, restricted units and share options would continue to vest per the original vesting schedule (subject to immediate vesting upon the occurrence of a subsequent change in control of the Company or the employee’s death), and options would continue to be exercisable for the balance of the applicable ten-year option period, subject to the employee’s compliance with the non-competition and employee non-solicitation provisions. The Rule of 70 does not apply to Trustees. For the individuals mentioned above who receive awards under the executive compensation program and retire at or after age 62 (age 72 for the Chairman of the Board) or under the Rule of 70, the award would be prorated in proportion to the number of days worked in the first year of the three-year performance period and the award would continue to vest per the original vesting schedule, subject to the individual’s compliance with the non-competition and employee non-solicitation provisions. The individual would not receive any payout of shares or units until the final payout is determined at the end of the three-year performance period. If an employee violates the non-competition and employee non-solicitation provisions after such retirement, all unvested restricted shares, unvested restricted units and unvested and vested share options at the time of the violation would be void, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees.


Award Activity

The following tables summarize compensation information regarding the restricted shares, restricted units, share optionsOptions and Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) for the threeyears ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014 (amounts in thousands):2017.

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Compensation

Expense

 

 

Compensation

Capitalized

 

 

Restricted Units/Options

In-Lieu of Bonus (1)

 

 

Compensation

Equity

 

 

Dividends

Incurred

 

Restricted shares (2)

 

$

11,522

 

 

$

916

 

 

$

 

 

$

12,438

 

 

$

979

 

Restricted units (2)

 

 

9,905

 

 

 

240

 

 

 

3,265

 

 

 

13,410

 

 

 

825

 

Options

 

 

2,420

 

 

 

254

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2,675

 

 

 

 

ESPP discount

 

 

602

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

642

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

24,449

 

 

$

1,450

 

 

$

3,266

 

 

$

29,165

 

 

$

1,804

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Compensation

Expense

 

 

Compensation

Capitalized

 

 

Restricted Units/Options

In-Lieu of Bonus (1)

 

 

Compensation

Equity

 

 

Dividends

Incurred

 

Restricted shares (2)

 

$

7,406

 

 

$

852

 

 

$

 

 

$

8,258

 

 

$

754

 

Restricted units (2)

 

 

12,310

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

1,663

 

 

 

14,009

 

 

 

963

 

Options

 

 

6,683

 

 

 

296

 

 

 

2,755

 

 

 

9,734

 

 

 

 

ESPP discount

 

 

733

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

767

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

27,132

 

 

$

1,218

 

 

$

4,418

 

 

$

32,768

 

 

$

1,717

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

Compensation

Expense

 

 

Compensation

Capitalized

 

 

Restricted Units/Options

In-Lieu of Bonus (1)

 

 

Compensation

Equity

 

 

Dividends

Incurred

 

Restricted shares (2)

 

$

9,209

 

 

$

568

 

 

$

 

 

$

9,777

 

 

$

761

 

Restricted units (2)

 

 

10,214

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

190

 

 

 

10,523

 

 

 

741

 

Options

 

 

4,893

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

1,619

 

 

 

6,835

 

 

 

 

ESPP discount

 

 

681

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

 

 

 

747

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

24,997

 

 

$

1,076

 

 

$

1,809

 

 

$

27,882

 

 

$

1,502

 

 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
Compensation
Expense
 
Compensation
Capitalized
 Restricted Units
In-Lieu of Bonus (1)
 
Compensation
Equity
 
Dividends
Incurred
Restricted shares (2)$13,539
 $1,477
 $
 $15,016
 $6,494
Restricted units (2)13,567
 591
 4,022
 18,180
 7,762
Share options2,839
 593
 
 3,432
 
ESPP discount585
 65
 
 650
 
Total$30,530
 $2,726
 $4,022
 $37,278
 $14,256

 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Compensation
Expense
 
Compensation
Capitalized
 
Restricted Units
In-Lieu of Bonus (1)
 
Compensation
Equity
 
Dividends
Incurred
Restricted shares (2)$13,755
 $1,311
 $
 $15,066
 $1,160
Restricted units (2)17,311
 538
 3,654
 21,503
 1,619
Share options2,746
 1,010
 
 3,756
 
ESPP discount795
 89
 
 884
 
Total$34,607
 $2,948
 $3,654
 $41,209
 $2,779
 Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
Compensation
Expense
 
Compensation
Capitalized
 
Compensation
Equity
 
Dividends
Incurred
Restricted shares$9,244
 $660
 $9,904
 $1,012
Restricted units11,049
 920
 11,969
 1,248
Share options6,453
 896
 7,349
 
ESPP discount797
 62
 859
 
Total$27,543
 $2,538
 $30,081
 $2,260

(1)

(1)Beginning in 2015, the

The Company allows eligible officers the ability to receive immediately vested restricted units (subject to the book-up provisions described above and a two-year hold restriction) or immediately vested Options in-lieu of any percentage of their annual cash bonus.

(2)

(2)

Includes performanceLTI plan awards granted under the executive compensation program.



F-55


Compensation expense is generally recognized for Awards as follows:

Restricted shares, restricted units and Options – Straight-line method over the vesting period of the Options, shares or units regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions.


LTI plan awards – Target amount is recognized under the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares or units regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions.

Restricted shares, restricted units and share options – Straight-line method over the vesting period of the options, shares or units regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions.

ESPP discount – Immediately upon the purchase of Common Shares each quarter.

Performance awards – Target amount is recognized under the straight-line method over the vesting period of the shares or units regardless of cliff or ratable vesting distinctions.
ESPP discount – Immediately upon the purchase of common shares each quarter.

The Company accelerates the recognition of compensation expense for all Awards for those individuals approaching or meeting the retirement age criteria discussed above.  The total compensation expense related to Awards not yet vested at December 31, 20162019 is $8.6$8.9 million (excluding(including the accelerated expenses for individuals approaching or meeting the retirement age criteria discussed above), which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average term of 1.311.35 years.


See Note 2 for additional information regarding the Company’s share-based compensation.

F-51


Table of Contents

The tabletables below summarizessummarize the Award activity of the Share Incentive Plansfor the three years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014:2017:

 

 

Common

Shares Subject

to Options

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

per Option

 

 

Restricted

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average Fair

Value per

Restricted Share

 

 

Restricted

Units

 

 

Weighted

Average Fair

Value per

Restricted Unit

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

6,023,101

 

 

$

42.05

 

 

 

452,034

 

 

$

70.35

 

 

 

802,257

 

 

$

75.26

 

Awards granted (1) (5)

 

 

1,337,898

 

 

$

60.88

 

 

 

93,867

 

 

$

61.94

 

 

 

291,921

 

 

$

68.57

 

Awards exercised/vested (2) (3) (4)

 

 

(846,137

)

 

$

37.26

 

 

 

(165,744

)

 

$

58.04

 

 

 

(192,644

)

 

$

54.16

 

Awards forfeited

 

 

(27,547

)

 

$

61.85

 

 

 

(10,416

)

 

$

72.44

 

 

 

(274

)

 

$

75.50

 

Awards expired

 

 

(3,483

)

 

$

65.91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

 

6,483,832

 

 

$

46.46

 

 

 

369,741

 

 

$

73.67

 

 

 

901,260

 

 

$

77.61

 

Awards granted (1) (5)

 

 

1,730,942

 

 

$

60.40

 

 

 

129,303

 

 

$

62.25

 

 

 

267,074

 

 

$

61.60

 

Awards exercised/vested (2) (3) (4)

 

 

(1,056,388

)

 

$

29.05

 

 

 

(194,116

)

 

$

77.32

 

 

 

(28,486

)

 

$

55.50

 

Awards forfeited

 

 

(38,133

)

 

$

60.74

 

 

 

(5,503

)

 

$

65.77

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Awards expired

 

 

(8,018

)

 

$

59.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

 

7,112,235

 

 

$

52.35

 

 

 

299,425

 

 

$

66.52

 

 

 

1,139,848

 

 

$

71.07

 

Awards granted (1) (5)

 

 

234,147

 

 

$

72.10

 

 

 

163,799

 

 

$

73.96

 

 

 

141,772

 

 

$

67.22

 

Awards exercised/vested (2) (3) (4)

 

 

(1,745,050

)

 

$

44.72

 

 

 

(151,321

)

 

$

75.41

 

 

 

(422,784

)

 

$

70.77

 

Awards forfeited

 

 

(30,489

)

 

$

61.92

 

 

 

(5,197

)

 

$

65.35

 

 

 

(552

)

 

$

69.43

 

Awards expired

 

 

(3,299

)

 

$

40.39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

 

5,567,544

 

 

$

55.52

 

 

 

306,706

 

 

$

66.15

 

 

 

858,284

 

 

$

64.95

 

 
Common
Shares Subject
to Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Option
 
Restricted
Shares
 
Weighted
Average Fair
Value per
Restricted Share
 Restricted
Units
 Weighted
Average Fair
Value per
Restricted Unit
Balance at December 31, 20138,470,532
 
$43.67
 500,234
 
$55.79
 471,256
 
$55.67
Awards granted (1)667,877
 
$56.72
 176,457
 
$56.56
 201,507
 
$53.82
Awards exercised/vested (2) (3) (4)(2,086,380) 
$39.34
 (175,344) 
$53.44
 (60,294) 
$53.71
Awards forfeited(19,022) 
$56.32
 (6,735) 
$56.57
 (667) 
$52.08
Awards expired(2,387) 
$55.24
 
 
 
 
Conversion of restricted shares
to restricted units

 
 (12,146) 
 12,146
 
Balance at December 31, 20147,030,620
 
$46.16
 482,466
 
$56.89
 623,948
 
$53.38
Awards granted (1) (5)171,150
 
$80.15
 174,112
 
$79.65
 337,505
 
$81.87
Awards exercised/vested (2) (3) (4)(1,456,363) 
$42.64
 (127,174) 
$60.21
 (72,003) 
$57.12
Awards forfeited(9,550) 
$64.53
 (5,970) 
$62.11
 (2,009) 
$64.39
Awards expired(1,492) 
$39.86
 
 
 
 
Conversion of restricted shares
to restricted units

 
 (1,284) 
 1,284
 
Balance at December 31, 20155,734,365
 
$48.04
 522,150
 
$63.67
 888,725
 
$63.91
Awards granted (1) (5)154,016
 
$64.99
 154,296
 
$75.19
 289,273
 
$81.05
Awards exercised/vested (2) (3) (4)(815,044) 
$38.01
 (217,805) 
$57.75
 (374,217) 
$52.73
Awards forfeited(10,512) 
$63.43
 (6,607) 
$70.73
 (1,524) 
$86.35
Awards expired(710) 
$68.40
 
 
 
 
Special dividend adjustment (6)960,986
 N/A
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 20166,023,101
 
$42.05
 452,034
 
$70.35
 802,257
 
$75.26

(1)

(1)

The weighted average grant date fair value for Options granted during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $11.09$8.05 per share, $13.67$6.17 per share and $9.21$5.86 per share, respectively.

(2)

(2)

The aggregate intrinsic value of optionsOptions exercised during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $26.2$58.1 million, $52.9$42.9 million and $50.8$25.6 million, respectively.  These values were calculated as the difference between the strike price of the underlying awards and the per share price at which each respective award was exercised.

(3)

(3)

The fair value of restricted shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $15.6$11.1 million, $10.2$11.5 million and $10.2 million, respectively.

(4)

(4)

The fair value of restricted units vested during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $27.2$29.1 million, $5.8$1.8 million and $3.4$11.7 million, respectively.

(5)

(5)

Includes performanceLTI plan awards granted under the executive compensation program.

(6)In addition to the regular quarterly dividends, the Company paid two special dividends to its shareholders and holders of OP Units of $11.00 per share/unit in the aggregate in 2016. Option holders were not entitled to these special dividends, but pursuant to the terms of the Share Incentive Plans are due equitable adjustments of additional options. The special dividend adjustment's weighted average

F-56


exercise price per option is reflected in the activity for 2016 for the awards granted, awards exercised/vested, and awards forfeited and the balance at December 31, 2016.

The following table summarizes information regarding optionsOptions outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2016:2019 (aggregate intrinsic value is in thousands):

 

 

Options

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual Life

in Years

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise Price

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value (1)

 

Options Outstanding

 

 

5,567,544

 

 

 

5.30

 

 

$

55.52

 

 

$

141,395

 

Options Exercisable

 

 

4,750,481

 

 

 

4.81

 

 

$

54.13

 

 

$

127,277

 

Vested and expected to vest

 

 

808,646

 

 

 

8.13

 

 

$

63.60

 

 

$

14,005

 

  Options Outstanding (1) Options Exercisable (2)
Range of Exercise Prices Options 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life in Years
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 Options 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
$19.67 to $24.93 892,111
 2.10 
$19.67
 892,111
 
$19.67
$24.94 to $37.39 930,884
 2.54 
$29.42
 930,884
 
$29.42
$37.40 to $43.62 2,412
 3.83 
$41.44
 2,412
 
$41.44
$43.63 to $49.86 2,715,880
 5.50 
$46.59
 2,515,401
 
$46.47
$49.87 to $56.09 1,114,654
 5.16 
$51.30
 1,114,654
 
$51.30
$56.10 to $62.32 2,761
 8.48 
$60.80
 2,761
 
$60.80
$62.33 to $68.55 364,399
 8.57 
$66.77
 152,454
 67.27
$19.67 to $68.55 6,023,101
 4.66 
$42.05
 5,610,677
 
$40.91
Vested and expected to vest
as of December 31, 2016
 6,003,870
 4.55 
$41.97
  
  

(1)

(1)

The aggregate intrinsic valuevalues were calculated as the excess, if any, between the Company’s closing share price of options outstanding that are vested and expected to vest as of$80.92 per share on December 31, 2016 is $135.3 million.2019 and the strike price of the underlying awards.

(2)The aggregate intrinsic value and weighted average remaining contractual life in years of options exercisable as of December 31, 2016 is $132.0 million and 4.4 years, respectively.
Note: The aggregate intrinsic values in Notes (1) and (2) above were both calculated as the excess, if any, between the Company’s closing share price of $64.36 per share on December 31, 2016 and the strike price of the underlying awards.

As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014, 4,436,9902017, 5,328,020 Options (with a weighted average exercise price of $45.11)$49.57) and 5,011,7845,336,043 Options (with a weighted average exercise price of $42.18)$43.24) were exercisable, respectively.

F-52


Table of Contents


13.

13.

Employee Plans


The Company established an Employee Share Purchase Plan to provide each employee and trustee the ability to annually acquire up to $100,000 of Common Shares of EQR.  The Company registered 7,000,000 Common Shares under the ESPP, of which 2,906,1632,714,332 Common Shares remained available for purchase at December 31, 2016.2019.  The Common Shares may be purchased quarterly at a price equal to 85% of the lesser of: (a) the closing price for a share on the last day of such quarter; and (b) the greater of: (i) the closing price for a share on the first day of such quarter, and (ii) the average closing price for a share for all the business days in the quarter.  The following table summarizes information regarding the Common Shares issued under the ESPP (thewith the net proceeds noted below werebeing contributed to ERPOP in exchange for OP Units)Units (amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Shares issued

 

 

48,131

 

 

 

75,414

 

 

 

68,286

 

Issuance price ranges

 

$59.56 – $72.91

 

 

$47.80 – $57.09

 

 

$52.79 – $58.06

 

Issuance proceeds

 

 

$3,116

 

 

$3,879

 

 

$3,744

 

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (Amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts)
Shares issued63,909 68,462 68,807
Issuance price ranges$51.85 – $63.37 $63.70 – $65.90 $45.90 – $55.95
Issuance proceeds$3,686 $4,404 $3,392

The Company established a defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”) to provide retirement benefits for employees that meet minimum employment criteria.  Prior to 2014, theThe Company matchedmatches dollar for dollar up to the first 3% of eligible compensation that a participant contributed to the 401(k) Plan. Beginning January 1, 2014, the Company increased its match to 4% of eligible compensation that a participant contributes to the 401(k) Plan for all employees except those defined as highly compensated employees, whose match remains atis 3%.  Participants are vested in the Company’s contributions over five years.  The Company recognized an expense in the amount of $5.0 million, $4.9 million $5.5 million and $5.2$4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively.


The Company established the SERP to provide certain officers and trustees an opportunity to defer a portion of their eligible compensation in order to save for retirement.  The SERP is restricted to investments in Common Shares, certain marketable securities that have been specifically approved and cash equivalents.  The deferred compensation liability represented in the SERP


F-57


and the securities issued to fund such deferred compensation liability are consolidated by the Company and carried on the Company’s balance sheet,sheets, and the Company’s Common Shares held in the SERP are accounted for as a reduction to paid in capital (included in general partner'spartner’s capital in the Operating Partnership'sPartnership’s financial statements).


14.

14.

Distribution Reinvestment Plan


On November 18, 2011, the Company filed with the SEC a Form S-3 Registration Statement to register 4,850,000 Common Shares pursuant to a Distribution Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (the "2011 DRIP"), which included the remaining shares available for issuance under a 2008 registration, which terminated as of such date. The registration statement was automatically declared effective the same day and was to expire at the earlier of the date on which all 4,850,000 shares had been issued or November 18, 2014.

On September 30, 2014, the Company filed with the SEC a Form S-3 Registration Statement to register 4,790,000 Common Shares under an amendedpursuant to a Distribution Reinvestment Plan (the "2014 DRIP"“2014 DRIP”), which included the remaining shares available for issuance under the 2011 DRIP, which terminated as of such date.a previous registration.  The registration was automatically declared effective the same day and will expire when all 4,790,000 shares have been issued.  The Company has 4,704,6084,664,977 Common Shares available for issuance under the 2014 DRIP at December 31, 2016.


2019.

The 2014 DRIP provides holders of record and beneficial owners of Common Shares and Preferred Shares with a simple and convenient method of reinvesting cash dividends/distributions in additional Common Shares.  Common Shares purchased under the 2014 DRIP may, at the option of EQR, be directly issued by EQR or purchased by EQR'sEQR’s transfer agent in the open market using participants'participants’ funds.  The net proceeds from any Common Share issuances are contributed to ERPOP in exchange for OP Units.


15.

15.

Transactions with Related Parties


The Company leases its corporate headquarters from an entity controlled byaffiliated with EQR’s Chairman of the Board of Trustees.  The lease terminatesterm expires on January 31, 2022. AmountsNovember 30, 2032 and contains two five-year extension options.  The amount incurred for such office space for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014, respectively,2017 were approximately $2.7 million, $2.6 million, $2.5 million and $2.5 million.$2.8 million, respectively.  The Company believes these amounts equalapproximate market rates for such rental space.


16.

16.

Commitments and Contingencies


The Company, as an owner of real estate, is subject to various Federal, state and local environmental laws.  Compliance by the Company with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on the Company.  However, the Company cannot predict the impact of new or changed laws or regulations on its current properties or on properties that it may acquire in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an environmental reserve of $4.7 million related to vacant land that it owns adjacent to one of its operating properties.


The Company was party to a housing discrimination lawsuit brought by a non-profit civil rights organization in April 2006 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.  The suit alleged that the Company designed and built many of its properties in violation of the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) and Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”).  The suit sought actual and punitive damages, injunctive relief (including modification of non-compliant properties), costs and attorneys’ fees.  On March 31, 2016, the Court found that certain features at seven of the Company’s properties did not satisfy the accessibility requirements of the FHA. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company settled the lawsuit for $3.1 million, net of insurance recoveries already received, which was recorded as other expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The Company also agreed to undertake the remediation of certain inaccessible features at a limited number of properties.

The Company has established a reserve related to various litigation matters associated with its Massachusetts properties and periodically assesses the adequacy of the reserve and makes adjustments as necessary. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company settled one matter, paying approximately $1.5 million, and recorded a reduction to the reserve of approximately $0.5 million, resulting in a total reserve of approximately $1.0 million at December 31, 2016. While no assurances can be given, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of any of these remaining litigation matters, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company does not believe there is any other litigation pending or threatened against it that, individually or in the aggregate, may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company has six2 wholly owned projects and 1 partially owned project totaling 2,064824 apartment units in various stages of development with remaining commitments to fund of approximately $260.6$421.2 million (inclusive of applicable construction mortgage and joint venture partner obligations) and estimated completion dates ranging through


F-58


December 31, 2018, September 30, 2021, as well as other completed development projects that are in various stages of lease uplease-up or are stabilized.

F-53


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company has two completed unconsolidated development properties that are stabilized. Both properties were co-developed with the same third party development partner in different ventures. The development2 joint venture agreements with this partner are primarily deal-specific regarding profit-sharing, equity contributions, returns on investment, buy-sell agreements and other customary provisions.third party partners for the consolidated development of multifamily rental properties.  The Company currently has no furtherdevelopment commitment to fund the project under construction is included in the development funding obligations related to these properties. While the Company is the managing member of bothtotals above for one of the joint ventures, was responsible for constructing both of the properties and gave certain construction cost overrun guarantees, theventures.  The joint venture agreements with each partner has significant participating rights and has active involvement in and oversight of the ongoing operations. Theinclude a buy-sell arrangements contain provisionsprovision that provideprovides the right, but not the obligation, for the Company to acquire theeach respective partner’s interests or sell its interests at any time following the occurrence of certain pre-defined events (including at stabilization) described in the developmentjoint venture agreements.  See Note 6 for furtheradditional discussion.


During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, total operating lease expense for ground leases and office space, including a portion of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and utilities, aggregated $26.2 million, $24.5 million and $21.2 million, respectively.

The Company has entered into a retirement benefits agreement with its Chairman of the Board of Trustees and deferred compensation agreements with its Vice Chairman and oneother former chief executive officer.officers.  During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the Company recognized compensation expense of $0.4 million, $0.3 million $0.4 million and $0.5$0.4 million, respectively, related to these agreements.


The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations for minimum rent payments under operating leases and deferred compensation for the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2016:2019:

(Payments)/Receipts Due by Year (in thousands)

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

Other Long-Term Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Compensation (1)

 

$

(761

)

 

$

(1,116

)

 

$

(1,116

)

 

$

(991

)

 

$

(709

)

 

$

(3,897

)

 

$

(8,590

)

(Payments)/Receipts Due by Year (in thousands)
  2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total
Operating Leases:  
  
  
  
    
  
Minimum Rent Payments (a) $(15,917) $(16,027) $(15,890) $(15,489) $(15,256) $(826,259) $(904,838)
Minimum Rent Receipts (b) 73,171
 60,004
 54,486
 50,705
 46,634
 211,853
 496,853
Other Long-Term Liabilities:  
  
  
  
    
  
Deferred Compensation (c) (1,387) (1,723) (1,128) (1,079) (1,079) (4,383) (10,779)

(1)

(a)Minimum basic rent due for various office space the Company leases and fixed base rent due on ground leases for 11 properties.
(b)Minimum basic rent receipts due for various retail/commercial space where the Company is the lessor.
(c)

Estimated payments to the Company's Chairman, ViceCompany’s Chairman and one former CEOexecutive officer based on actual and plannedestimated retirement dates.


17.

17.

Reportable Segments


Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business activities from which they may earn revenues and incur expenses and about which discrete financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker.  The chief operating decision maker decides how resources are allocated and assesses performance on a recurring basis at least quarterly.


The Company’s primary business is the acquisition, development and management of multifamily residential properties, which includes the generation of rental and other related income through the leasing of apartment units to residents.  The chief operating decision maker evaluates the Company'sCompany’s operating performance geographically by market and both on a same store and non-same store basis.  The Company’s geographic same store operating segments located in its coastal marketsurban and high-density suburban communities represent its reportable segments. As of January 1, 2016,segments (the recently acquired Denver properties owned by the Company has revised the presentation of Southern California to show separate results for Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange County, along with a subtotal of the three markets combined, for both the current and comparable periods.were included in non–same store through 2019). The Company'sCompany’s operating segments located in its other markets (Phoenix) that are not material have also been included in the tables presented below. See also Note 4 for further discussion of the Starwood Transaction and the operating segments/locations in which properties were sold.


The Company’s fee and asset management and development activities are other business activities that do not constitute an operating segment and as such, have been aggregated in the "Other"“Other” category in the tables presented below.



F-59


All revenues are from external customers and there is no0 customer who contributed 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues during the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2014.


2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The primary financial measure for the Company’s rental real estate segment is net operating income (“NOI”), which represents rental income less: 1) property and maintenance expense and 2) real estate taxes and insurance expense (all as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income).  As of January 1, 2016, NOI no longer includes an allocation of property management expenses either in the current or comparable periods. The Company believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of its operating performance because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the Company’s apartment properties.


  Revenues for all leases are reflected on a straight-line basis in accordance with GAAP for the current and comparable periods.  

The following table presents a reconciliation of NOI from our rental real estate specific to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Rental income

 

$

2,700,691

 

 

$

2,577,681

 

 

$

2,470,689

 

Property and maintenance expense

 

 

(446,845

)

 

 

(429,335

)

 

 

(405,281

)

Real estate taxes and insurance expense

 

 

(366,139

)

 

 

(357,814

)

 

 

(335,495

)

Total operating expenses

 

 

(812,984

)

 

 

(787,149

)

 

 

(740,776

)

Net operating income

 

$

1,887,707

 

 

$

1,790,532

 

 

$

1,729,913

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2016 2015 2014
Rental income $2,422,233
 $2,736,578
 $2,605,311
Property and maintenance expense (406,823) (479,160) (473,098)
Real estate taxes and insurance expense (317,387) (339,802) (325,401)
Total operating expenses (724,210) (818,962) (798,499)
Net operating income $1,698,023
 $1,917,616
 $1,806,812

F-54


Table of Contents

The following tables present NOI for each segment from our rental real estate specific to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, as well as total assets and capital expenditures at December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively (amounts in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

Rental

Income

 

 

Operating

Expenses

 

 

NOI

 

 

Rental

Income

 

 

Operating

Expenses

 

 

NOI

 

 

Rental

Income

 

 

Operating

Expenses

 

 

NOI

 

Same store (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Los Angeles

 

$

468,517

 

 

$

136,096

 

 

$

332,421

 

 

$

451,592

 

 

$

129,455

 

 

$

322,137

 

 

$

402,192

 

 

$

114,055

 

 

$

288,137

 

Orange County

 

 

105,087

 

 

 

24,407

 

 

 

80,680

 

 

 

101,198

 

 

 

24,468

 

 

 

76,730

 

 

 

88,527

 

 

 

21,544

 

 

 

66,983

 

San Diego

 

 

95,042

 

 

 

24,636

 

 

 

70,406

 

 

 

91,971

 

 

 

24,024

 

 

 

67,947

 

 

 

88,507

 

 

 

23,073

 

 

 

65,434

 

Subtotal - Southern California

 

 

668,646

 

 

 

185,139

 

 

 

483,507

 

 

 

644,761

 

 

 

177,947

 

 

 

466,814

 

 

 

579,226

 

 

 

158,672

 

 

 

420,554

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco

 

 

480,499

 

 

 

116,036

 

 

 

364,463

 

 

 

463,492

 

 

 

112,331

 

 

 

351,161

 

 

 

430,501

 

 

 

108,689

 

 

 

321,812

 

Washington D.C.

 

 

413,006

 

 

 

125,688

 

 

 

287,318

 

 

 

403,761

 

 

 

123,345

 

 

 

280,416

 

 

 

430,060

 

 

 

129,720

 

 

 

300,340

 

New York

 

 

454,448

 

 

 

188,784

 

 

 

265,664

 

 

 

444,112

 

 

 

178,055

 

 

 

266,057

 

 

 

454,945

 

 

 

170,064

 

 

 

284,881

 

Boston

 

 

227,547

 

 

 

62,176

 

 

 

165,371

 

 

 

218,778

 

 

 

60,409

 

 

 

158,369

 

 

 

223,595

 

 

 

60,931

 

 

 

162,664

 

Seattle

 

 

207,019

 

 

 

56,016

 

 

 

151,003

 

 

 

200,222

 

 

 

55,871

 

 

 

144,351

 

 

 

191,074

 

 

 

52,470

 

 

 

138,604

 

Other Markets

 

 

2,094

 

 

 

714

 

 

 

1,380

 

 

 

1,940

 

 

 

658

 

 

 

1,282

 

 

 

1,839

 

 

 

652

 

 

 

1,187

 

Total same store

 

 

2,453,259

 

 

 

734,553

 

 

 

1,718,706

 

 

 

2,377,066

 

 

 

708,616

 

 

 

1,668,450

 

 

 

2,311,240

 

 

 

681,198

 

 

 

1,630,042

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-same store/other (2) (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-same store

 

 

196,476

 

 

 

62,591

 

 

 

133,885

 

 

 

103,688

 

 

 

36,874

 

 

 

66,814

 

 

 

95,016

 

 

 

30,742

 

 

 

64,274

 

Other (3)

 

 

50,956

 

 

 

15,840

 

 

 

35,116

 

 

 

96,927

 

 

 

41,659

 

 

 

55,268

 

 

 

64,433

 

 

 

28,836

 

 

 

35,597

 

Total non-same store/other

 

 

247,432

 

 

 

78,431

 

 

 

169,001

 

 

 

200,615

 

 

 

78,533

 

 

 

122,082

 

 

 

159,449

 

 

 

59,578

 

 

 

99,871

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totals

 

$

2,700,691

 

 

$

812,984

 

 

$

1,887,707

 

 

$

2,577,681

 

 

$

787,149

 

 

$

1,790,532

 

 

$

2,470,689

 

 

$

740,776

 

 

$

1,729,913

 

  Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2014
  Rental Income Operating Expenses NOI Rental Income Operating Expenses NOI Rental Income Operating Expenses NOI
Same store (1)                  
   Los Angeles $368,734
 $107,138
 $261,596
 $349,285
 $104,614
 $244,671
 $259,437
 $81,972
 $177,465
   San Diego 88,049
 23,489
 64,560
 83,491
 22,938
 60,553
 79,217
 22,605
 56,612
   Orange County 79,602
 18,931
 60,671
 75,068
 18,550
 56,518
 71,440
 18,211
 53,229
   Subtotal - Southern California 536,385
 149,558
 386,827
 507,844
 146,102
 361,742
 410,094
 122,788
 287,306
                   
   New York 457,882
 160,772
 297,110
 450,460
 152,682
 297,778
 455,598
 156,881
 298,717
   Washington D.C. 424,055
 126,154
 297,901
 417,985
 123,450
 294,535
 451,973
 131,964
 320,009
   San Francisco 365,019
 88,141
 276,878
 343,089
 84,603
 258,486
 340,252
 96,217
 244,035
   Boston 237,683
 66,283
 171,400
 232,462
 67,252
 165,210
 244,612
 70,070
 174,542
   Seattle 154,482
 42,644
 111,838
 145,646
 39,307
 106,339
 153,197
 45,781
 107,416
   Other Markets 1,798
 568
 1,230
 1,680
 528
 1,152
 385,664
 120,395
 265,269
Total same store 2,177,304
 634,120
 1,543,184
 2,099,166
 613,924
 1,485,242
 2,441,390
 744,096
 1,697,294
                   
Non-same store/other (2) (3)                  
   Non-same store 163,768
 56,403
 107,365
 72,123
 27,078
 45,045
 83,715
 28,992
 54,723
   Other (3) 81,161
 33,687
 47,474
 565,289
 177,960
 387,329
 80,206
 25,411
 54,795
Total non-same store/other 244,929
 90,090
 154,839
 637,412
 205,038
 432,374
 163,921
 54,403
 109,518
                   
Totals $2,422,233
 $724,210
 $1,698,023
 $2,736,578
 $818,962
 $1,917,616
 $2,605,311
 $798,499
 $1,806,812

(1)

(1)

For the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, same store primarily includes all properties acquired or completed that arewere stabilized prior to January 1, 2015,2018, less properties subsequently sold, which represented 69,87971,830 apartment units.  For the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, same store primarily includes all properties acquired or completed that arewere stabilized prior to January 1, 2014,2017, less properties subsequently sold, which represented 96,28671,721 apartment units.

(2)

(2)

For the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, non-same store primarily includes properties acquired after January 1, 2015,2018, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2015.2018.  For the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, non-same store primarily


F-60


includes properties acquired after January 1, 2014, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2014.
(3)Other includes development, other corporate operations and operations prior to sale for properties sold in 2014 through 2016 that do not meet the new discontinued operations criteria.
  Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015
  Total Assets Capital Expenditures Total Assets Capital Expenditures
Same store (1)        
   Los Angeles $2,513,979
 $26,195
 $2,586,859
 $22,015
   San Diego 471,937
 5,172
 488,260
 4,608
   Orange County 260,918
 6,747
 268,479
 7,336
   Subtotal - Southern California 3,246,834
 38,114
 3,343,598
 33,959
         
   New York 4,275,930
 25,329
 4,383,354
 18,170
   Washington D.C. 3,916,264
 33,867
 4,023,474
 33,455
   San Francisco 2,441,256
 24,411
 2,506,004
 25,104
   Boston 1,723,942
 20,936
 1,774,181
 17,355
   Seattle 1,031,764
 13,464
 1,061,351
 9,106
   Other Markets 12,902
 67
 13,162
 182
Total same store 16,648,892
 156,188
 17,105,124
 137,331
         
Non-same store/other (2) (3)        
   Non-same store 2,864,250
 12,179
 2,441,637
 6,341
   Other (3) 1,191,006
 3,810
 3,563,435
 38,441
Total non-same store/other 4,055,256
 15,989
 6,005,072
 44,782
         
Totals $20,704,148
 $172,177
 $23,110,196
 $182,113
(1)Same store primarily includes all properties acquired or completed that are stabilized prior to January 1, 2015, less properties subsequently sold, which represented 69,879 apartment units.
(2)Non-same store primarily includes properties acquired after January 1, 2015,2017, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2015.2017.  

(3)

Other includes development, other corporate operations and operations prior to disposition for properties sold.

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

 

Capital Expenditures

 

 

Total Assets

 

 

Capital Expenditures

 

Same store (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Los Angeles

 

$

2,975,420

 

 

$

31,738

 

 

$

2,958,361

 

 

$

28,574

 

Orange County

 

 

404,545

 

 

 

9,276

 

 

 

418,041

 

 

 

8,214

 

San Diego

 

 

389,537

 

 

 

4,464

 

 

 

405,449

 

 

 

4,525

 

Subtotal - Southern California

 

 

3,769,502

 

 

 

45,478

 

 

 

3,781,851

 

 

 

41,313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco

 

 

3,238,884

 

 

 

28,153

 

 

 

3,325,595

 

 

 

42,497

 

Washington D.C.

 

 

3,370,750

 

 

 

23,015

 

 

 

3,484,045

 

 

 

26,981

 

New York

 

 

3,866,500

 

 

 

25,132

 

 

 

3,878,580

 

 

 

23,126

 

Boston

 

 

1,464,196

 

 

 

23,823

 

 

 

1,514,814

 

 

 

24,000

 

Seattle

 

 

1,292,609

 

 

 

19,990

 

 

 

1,330,959

 

 

 

18,065

 

Other Markets

 

 

12,931

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

12,781

 

 

 

163

 

Total same store

 

 

17,015,372

 

 

 

165,785

 

 

 

17,328,625

 

 

 

176,145

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-same store/other (2) (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-same store

 

 

3,447,497

 

 

 

10,788

 

 

 

1,990,102

 

 

 

5,934

 

Other (3)

 

 

709,900

 

 

 

1,850

 

 

 

1,075,482

 

 

 

6,422

 

Total non-same store/other

 

 

4,157,397

 

 

 

12,638

 

 

 

3,065,584

 

 

 

12,356

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totals

 

$

21,172,769

 

 

$

178,423

 

 

$

20,394,209

 

 

$

188,501

 

(3)

(1)

Same store primarily includes all properties acquired or completed that were stabilized prior to January 1, 2018, less properties subsequently sold, which represented 71,830 apartment units.

(2)

Non-same store primarily includes properties acquired after January 1, 2018, plus any properties in lease-up and not stabilized as of January 1, 2018.

(3)

Other includes development, other corporate operations and capital expenditures for properties sold.


18.

18.

Subsequent Events/OtherEvents


Subsequent Events


There have been no material subsequent events occurring sinceto December 31, 2016.

Other

During2019, the year ended December 31, 2014, the Operating Partnership issued the 3.00% Series P Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units with a liquidation value of approximately $18.4 million in conjunction with the buyout of its partner's 95% interest in a previously unconsolidated development property. The Series P Preference Units were classified as a liability due in part to the fact that the holder could put the units back to the Operating Partnership for cash. Dividends were paid quarterly on the Series P Preference Units. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company purchased all of the issued and outstanding Series P Preference Units at a par value of $18.4 million and retired these units in conjunction with the purchase. In conjunction with this transaction, the Company reduced other liabilities by $18.4 million.Company:

Sold 1 partially owned property consisting of 136 apartment units for $31.2 million.


During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold its entire interest in the management contracts and related rights associated with the military housing ventures at Joint Base Lewis McChord consisting of 5,161 apartment units for approximately $63.3 million and recognized a gain on sale of approximately $52.4 million, which is included in interest and other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

F-61

F-55



During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred charges of $1.5 million, $1.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to property acquisition costs, such as survey, title and legal fees, on the acquisition of operating properties and $4.1 million, $3.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively, related to the write-off of various pursuit and out-of-pocket costs for terminated acquisition, disposition and development transactions. These costs, totaling $5.6 million, $4.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively, are included in other expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 the Company received $3.2 million, $6.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the settlement of various litigation/insurance claims, which are included in interest and other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.


19.

19.

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)


Equity Residential


The following unaudited quarterly data has been prepared on the basis of a December 31 year-end.  Amounts are in thousands, except for per share amounts.

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

2019 (1)

 

3/31

 

 

6/30

 

 

9/30

 

 

12/31

 

Total revenues

 

$

662,494

 

 

$

669,517

 

 

$

685,145

 

 

$

683,919

 

Operating income

 

 

209,969

 

 

 

369,260

 

 

 

368,363

 

 

 

408,952

 

Net income *

 

 

109,257

 

 

 

321,299

 

 

 

277,846

 

 

 

301,306

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

 

103,766

 

 

 

308,196

 

 

 

266,333

 

 

 

288,992

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Net income available to Common Shares - basic

 

$

0.28

 

 

$

0.83

 

 

$

0.72

 

 

$

0.78

 

   Net income available to Common Shares - diluted

 

$

0.28

 

 

$

0.83

 

 

$

0.71

 

 

$

0.77

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

2018 (1)

 

3/31

 

 

6/30

 

 

9/30

 

 

12/31

 

Total revenues

 

$

633,016

 

 

$

639,808

 

 

$

652,867

 

 

$

652,743

 

Operating income

 

 

339,082

 

 

 

217,603

 

 

 

339,403

 

 

 

219,282

 

Net income *

 

 

220,548

 

 

 

118,410

 

 

 

223,846

 

 

 

122,388

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

 

211,036

 

 

 

112,830

 

 

 

214,164

 

 

 

116,415

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Net income available to Common Shares - basic

 

$

0.57

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.58

 

 

$

0.32

 

   Net income available to Common Shares - diluted

 

$

0.57

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.58

 

 

$

0.31

 

  First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
2016 3/31 6/30 9/30 12/31
Total revenues $619,083
 $595,154
 $606,074
 $605,489
Operating income 216,625
 206,018
 209,373
 224,070
Income from continuing operations 3,731,988
 228,365
 217,246
 301,987
Discontinued operations, net (157) 35
 246
 394
Net income * 3,731,831
 228,400
 217,492
 302,381
Net income available to Common Shares 3,586,985
 218,067
 207,543
 276,477
Earnings per share – basic:        
Net income available to Common Shares $9.84
 $0.60
 $0.57
 $0.76
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding 364,592
 365,047
 365,109
 365,256
Earnings per share – diluted:        
Net income available to Common Shares $9.76
 $0.59
 $0.56
 $0.75
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding 382,243
 382,065
 382,373
 381,860
  First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
2015 3/31 6/30 9/30 12/31
Total revenues $666,371
 $679,112
 $696,289
 $703,193
Operating income 218,331
 246,255
 257,594
 287,058
Income from continuing operations 190,069
 298,504
 205,375
 213,673
Discontinued operations, net 155
 114
 81
 47
Net income * 190,224
 298,618
 205,456
 213,720
Net income available to Common Shares 178,842
 285,587
 195,859
 202,989
Earnings per share – basic:        
Net income available to Common Shares $0.49
 $0.79
 $0.54
 $0.56
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding 363,098
 363,476
 363,579
 363,828
Earnings per share – diluted:        
Net income available to Common Shares $0.49
 $0.78
 $0.53
 $0.55
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding 380,327
 380,491
 380,663
 381,220

* The Company did not have any discontinued operations, extraordinary items or cumulative effect of change in accounting principle during the years ended December 31, 2016periods presented.  Therefore, income from continuing operations and 2015. Therefore, income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle isare not shown as it wasthey were both equal to the net income amounts disclosed above.

(1)

Amounts may not equal full year results due to rounding.






F-62



ERP Operating Limited Partnership


The following unaudited quarterly data has been prepared on the basis of a December 31 year-end.  Amounts are in thousands, except for per Unit amounts.

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

2019 (1)

 

3/31

 

 

6/30

 

 

9/30

 

 

12/31

 

Total revenues

 

$

662,494

 

 

$

669,517

 

 

$

685,145

 

 

$

683,919

 

Operating income

 

 

209,969

 

 

 

369,260

 

 

 

368,363

 

 

 

408,952

 

Net income *

 

 

109,257

 

 

 

321,299

 

 

 

277,846

 

 

 

301,306

 

Net income available to Units

 

 

107,685

 

 

 

319,706

 

 

 

276,243

 

 

 

299,687

 

Earnings per Unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Net income available to Units - basic

 

$

0.28

 

 

$

0.83

 

 

$

0.72

 

 

$

0.78

 

   Net income available to Units - diluted

 

$

0.28

 

 

$

0.83

 

 

$

0.71

 

 

$

0.77

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

2018 (1)

 

3/31

 

 

6/30

 

 

9/30

 

 

12/31

 

Total revenues

 

$

633,016

 

 

$

639,808

 

 

$

652,867

 

 

$

652,743

 

Operating income

 

 

339,082

 

 

 

217,603

 

 

 

339,403

 

 

 

219,282

 

Net income *

 

 

220,548

 

 

 

118,410

 

 

 

223,846

 

 

 

122,388

 

Net income available to Units

 

 

219,095

 

 

 

117,129

 

 

 

222,323

 

 

 

120,837

 

Earnings per Unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Net income available to Units - basic

 

$

0.57

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.58

 

 

$

0.32

 

   Net income available to Units - diluted

 

$

0.57

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.58

 

 

$

0.31

 

  First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
2016 3/31 6/30 9/30 12/31
Total revenues $619,083
 $595,154
 $606,074
 $605,489
Operating income 216,625
 206,018
 209,373
 224,070
Income from continuing operations 3,731,988
 228,365
 217,246
 301,987
Discontinued operations, net (157) 35
 246
 394
Net income * 3,731,831
 228,400
 217,492
 302,381
Net income available to Units 3,730,294
 226,847
 215,896
 287,546
Earnings per Unit – basic:  
  
  
  
Net income available to Units $9.84
 $0.60
 $0.57
 $0.76
Weighted average Units outstanding 378,289
 378,934
 379,008
 379,081
Earnings per Unit – diluted:  
    
  
Net income available to Units $9.76
 $0.59
 $0.56
 $0.75
Weighted average Units outstanding 382,243
 382,065
 382,373
 381,860

  First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
2015 3/31 6/30 9/30 12/31
Total revenues $666,371
 $679,112
 $696,289
 $703,193
Operating income 218,331
 246,255
 257,594
 287,058
Income from continuing operations 190,069
 298,504
 205,375
 213,673
Discontinued operations, net 155
 114
 81
 47
Net income * 190,224
 298,618
 205,456
 213,720
Net income available to Units 185,901
 296,941
 203,637
 211,039
Earnings per Unit – basic:  
  
  
  
Net income available to Units $0.49
 $0.79
 $0.54
 $0.56
Weighted average Units outstanding 376,696
 377,063
 377,147
 377,380
Earnings per Unit – diluted:  
  
  
  
Net income available to Units $0.49
 $0.78
 $0.53
 $0.55
Weighted average Units outstanding 380,327
 380,491
 380,663
 381,220

* The Operating Partnership did not have any discontinued operations, extraordinary items or cumulative effect of change in accounting principle during the years ended December 31, 2016periods presented.  Therefore, income from continuing operations and 2015. Therefore, income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle isare not shown as it wasthey were both equal to the net income amounts disclosed above.

(1)

Amounts may not equal full year results due to rounding.



F-63

F-56



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

Overall Summary

December 31, 20162019

 

 

Properties

 

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Gross

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net

 

 

Encumbrances (1)

 

Wholly Owned Unencumbered

 

 

257

 

 

 

68,002

 

 

$

23,408,268,350

 

 

$

(6,199,955,243

)

 

$

17,208,313,107

 

 

$

 

Wholly Owned Encumbered

 

 

35

 

 

 

8,425

 

 

 

3,204,805,398

 

 

 

(792,348,079

)

 

 

2,412,457,319

 

 

 

1,630,731,451

 

Wholly Owned Properties

 

 

292

 

 

 

76,427

 

 

 

26,613,073,748

 

 

 

(6,992,303,322

)

 

 

19,620,770,426

 

 

 

1,630,731,451

 

Partially Owned Unencumbered

 

 

9

 

 

 

1,847

 

 

 

524,897,809

 

 

 

(133,111,488

)

 

 

391,786,321

 

 

 

 

Partially Owned Encumbered

 

 

8

 

 

 

1,688

 

 

 

395,635,869

 

 

 

(151,371,564

)

 

 

244,264,305

 

 

 

310,878,101

 

Partially Owned Properties

 

 

17

 

 

 

3,535

 

 

 

920,533,678

 

 

 

(284,483,052

)

 

 

636,050,626

 

 

 

310,878,101

 

Total Unencumbered Properties

 

 

266

 

 

 

69,849

 

 

 

23,933,166,159

 

 

 

(6,333,066,731

)

 

 

17,600,099,428

 

 

 

 

Total Encumbered Properties

 

 

43

 

 

 

10,113

 

 

 

3,600,441,267

 

 

 

(943,719,643

)

 

 

2,656,721,624

 

 

 

1,941,609,552

 

Total Consolidated Investment in Real Estate

 

 

309

 

 

 

79,962

 

 

$

27,533,607,426

 

 

$

(7,276,786,374

)

 

$

20,256,821,052

 

 

$

1,941,609,552

 

 Properties (H) Apartment Units (H) Investment in Real Estate, Gross 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 Investment in Real Estate, Net Encumbrances (1)
Wholly Owned Unencumbered204
 52,102
 $18,448,319,778
 $(3,651,990,171) $14,796,329,607
 $
Wholly Owned Encumbered79
 21,196
 6,291,785,512
 (1,497,361,379) 4,794,424,133
 3,818,071,013
Wholly Owned Properties283
 73,298
 24,740,105,290
 (5,149,351,550) 19,590,753,740
 3,818,071,013
            
Partially Owned Unencumbered9
 1,527
 288,230,337
 (98,826,978) 189,403,359
 
Partially Owned Encumbered8
 1,688
 358,089,848
 (112,210,888) 245,878,960
 301,109,812
Partially Owned Properties17
 3,215
 646,320,185
 (211,037,866) 435,282,319
 301,109,812
            
            
Total Unencumbered Properties213
 53,629
 18,736,550,115
 (3,750,817,149) 14,985,732,966
 
Total Encumbered Properties87
 22,884
 6,649,875,360
 (1,609,572,267) 5,040,303,093
 4,119,180,825
Total Consolidated Investment in Real Estate300
 76,513
 $25,386,425,475
 $(5,360,389,416) $20,026,036,059
 $4,119,180,825
            

(1)

(1)

See attached Encumbrances Reconciliation.





















S-1



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

Encumbrances Reconciliation

December 31, 20162019

Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances

 

Number of

Properties

Encumbered by

 

 

See Properties

With Note:

 

Amount

 

Archstone Master Property Holdings LLC

 

 

13

 

 

H

 

$

798,230,171

 

Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

798,230,171

 

Individual Property Encumbrances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,143,379,381

 

Total Encumbrances per Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,941,609,552

 

Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances 
Number of
Properties Encumbered by
 See Properties With Note: Amount
EQR-Fanwell 2007 LP 4 I $299,795,866
EQR-Wellfan 2008 LP (R) 10 J 549,337,934
Archstone Master Property Holdings LLC 13 K 796,845,087
       
Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances 27   1,645,978,887
       
Individual Property Encumbrances     2,473,201,938
       
Total Encumbrances per Financial Statements     $4,119,180,825



























S-2



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

(Amounts in thousands)

The changes in total real estate for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 are as follows:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

26,511,022

 

 

$

26,026,896

 

 

$

25,386,425

 

Acquisitions and development

 

 

1,704,320

 

 

 

855,254

 

 

 

710,960

 

Improvements

 

 

180,944

 

 

 

192,661

 

 

 

204,113

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(862,679

)

 

 

(563,789

)

 

 

(274,602

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

27,533,607

 

 

$

26,511,022

 

 

$

26,026,896

 

 2016 2015 2014
Balance, beginning of year$28,542,697
 $27,675,383
 $26,800,948
Acquisitions and development832,803
 964,645
 1,121,423
Improvements174,981
 186,104
 191,243
Dispositions and other(4,164,056) (283,435) (438,231)
Balance, end of year (1)$25,386,425
 $28,542,697
 $27,675,383

The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 are as follows:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

6,696,281

 

 

$

6,040,378

 

 

$

5,360,389

 

Depreciation

 

 

831,083

 

 

 

785,725

 

 

 

743,749

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(250,578

)

 

 

(129,822

)

 

 

(63,760

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

7,276,786

 

 

$

6,696,281

 

 

$

6,040,378

 

 2016 2015 2014
Balance, beginning of year$6,084,616
 $5,432,805
 $4,807,709
Depreciation705,649
 765,895
 758,861
Dispositions and other(1,429,876) (114,084) (133,765)
Balance, end of year (1)$5,360,389
 $6,084,616
 $5,432,805

(1) Balances at December 31, 2015 include assets classified as real estate held for sale.

S-3



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 20162019

Description

 

 

Initial Cost to

Company

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Acquisition

(Improvements,

net) (E)

 

 

Gross Amount Carried at

Close of Period 12/31/19

 

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Retail/

Commercial

Space

 

 

Date of

Construction

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures (A)

 

 

Total (B)

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation (C)

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net at

12/31/19

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Wholly Owned Unencumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100 K Apartments (fka 100K Street)

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

222

 

 

$

15,600,000

 

 

$

69,662,369

 

 

$

2,484

 

 

$

15,600,000

 

 

$

69,664,853

 

 

$

85,264,853

 

 

$

(3,157,965

)

 

$

82,106,888

 

 

$

 

140 Riverside Boulevard

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2003

 

 

354

 

 

 

103,539,100

 

 

 

94,082,725

 

 

 

10,160,746

 

 

 

103,539,100

 

 

 

104,243,471

 

 

 

207,782,571

 

 

 

(52,510,393

)

 

 

155,272,178

 

 

 

 

160 Riverside Boulevard

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2001

 

 

455

 

 

 

139,933,500

 

 

 

190,964,745

 

 

 

17,198,947

 

 

 

139,933,500

 

 

 

208,163,692

 

 

 

348,097,192

 

 

 

(104,423,480

)

 

 

243,673,712

 

 

 

 

170 Amsterdam

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2015

 

 

236

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,096,955

 

 

 

439,194

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,536,149

 

 

 

112,536,149

 

 

 

(20,556,743

)

 

 

91,979,406

 

 

 

 

175 Kent

 

Brooklyn, NY

 

G

 

 

2011

 

 

113

 

 

 

22,037,831

 

 

 

53,962,169

 

 

 

2,003,647

 

 

 

22,037,831

 

 

 

55,965,816

 

 

 

78,003,647

 

 

 

(18,206,594

)

 

 

59,797,053

 

 

 

 

180 Montague (fka Brooklyn Heights)

 

Brooklyn, NY

 

G

 

 

2000

 

 

193

 

 

 

32,400,000

 

 

 

92,675,228

 

 

 

4,764,589

 

 

 

32,400,000

 

 

 

97,439,817

 

 

 

129,839,817

 

 

 

(27,077,371

)

 

 

102,762,446

 

 

 

 

180 Riverside Boulevard

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1998

 

 

516

 

 

 

144,968,250

 

 

 

138,346,681

 

 

 

14,692,592

 

 

 

144,968,250

 

 

 

153,039,273

 

 

 

298,007,523

 

 

 

(78,364,843

)

 

 

219,642,680

 

 

 

 

1111 Belle Pre (fka The Madison)

 

Alexandria, VA

 

G

 

 

2014

 

 

360

 

 

 

18,937,702

 

 

 

94,758,679

 

 

 

399,141

 

 

 

18,937,702

 

 

 

95,157,820

 

 

 

114,095,522

 

 

 

(25,780,466

)

 

 

88,315,056

 

 

 

 

1210 Mass

 

Washington, D.C.

 

G

 

 

2004

 

 

144

 

 

 

9,213,512

 

 

 

36,559,189

 

 

 

2,770,003

 

 

 

9,213,512

 

 

 

39,329,192

 

 

 

48,542,704

 

 

 

(20,032,298

)

 

 

28,510,406

 

 

 

 

1401 Joyce on Pentagon Row

 

Arlington, VA

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

326

 

 

 

9,780,000

 

 

 

89,668,165

 

 

 

5,482,703

 

 

 

9,780,000

 

 

 

95,150,868

 

 

 

104,930,868

 

 

 

(38,110,856

)

 

 

66,820,012

 

 

 

 

1500 Mass Ave

 

Washington, D.C.

 

G

 

 

1951

 

 

556

 

 

 

54,638,298

 

 

 

40,361,702

 

 

 

15,851,496

 

 

 

54,638,298

 

 

 

56,213,198

 

 

 

110,851,496

 

 

 

(29,241,959

)

 

 

81,609,537

 

 

 

 

1800 Oak (fka Rosslyn)

 

Arlington, VA

 

G

 

 

2003

 

 

314

 

 

 

31,400,000

 

 

 

109,005,734

 

 

 

7,759,305

 

 

 

31,400,000

 

 

 

116,765,039

 

 

 

148,165,039

 

 

 

(32,605,736

)

 

 

115,559,303

 

 

 

 

2201 Pershing Drive

 

Arlington, VA

 

G

 

 

2012

 

 

188

 

 

 

11,321,198

 

 

 

49,674,175

 

 

 

2,653,163

 

 

 

11,321,198

 

 

 

52,327,338

 

 

 

63,648,536

 

 

 

(15,332,930

)

 

 

48,315,606

 

 

 

 

2201 Wilson

 

Arlington, VA

 

G

 

 

2000

 

 

219

 

 

 

21,900,000

 

 

 

78,724,663

 

 

 

4,621,475

 

 

 

21,900,000

 

 

 

83,346,138

 

 

 

105,246,138

 

 

 

(23,254,386

)

 

 

81,991,752

 

 

 

 

2400 M St

 

Washington, D.C.

 

G

 

 

2006

 

 

359

 

 

 

30,006,593

 

 

 

114,013,785

 

 

 

4,706,151

 

 

 

30,006,593

 

 

 

118,719,936

 

 

 

148,726,529

 

 

 

(57,645,397

)

 

 

91,081,132

 

 

 

 

315 on A

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

2013

 

 

202

 

 

 

14,450,070

 

 

 

115,824,930

 

 

 

1,261,179

 

 

 

14,450,070

 

 

 

117,086,109

 

 

 

131,536,179

 

 

 

(22,891,380

)

 

 

108,644,799

 

 

 

 

340 Fremont (fka Rincon Hill)

 

San Francisco, CA

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

348

 

 

 

42,000,000

 

 

 

248,609,655

 

 

 

179,247

 

 

 

42,000,000

 

 

 

248,788,902

 

 

 

290,788,902

 

 

 

(33,388,938

)

 

 

257,399,964

 

 

 

 

341 Nevins

 

Brooklyn, NY

 

 

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

3,621,830

 

 

 

189,222

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,621,830

 

 

 

189,222

 

 

 

3,811,052

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,811,052

 

 

 

 

3003 Van Ness (fka Van Ness)

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

1970

 

 

625

 

 

 

56,300,000

 

 

 

141,191,580

 

 

 

7,157,154

 

 

 

56,300,000

 

 

 

148,348,734

 

 

 

204,648,734

 

 

 

(43,856,738

)

 

 

160,791,996

 

 

 

 

425 Mass

 

Washington, D.C.

 

G

 

 

2009

 

 

559

 

 

 

28,150,000

 

 

 

138,600,000

 

 

 

4,759,357

 

 

 

28,150,000

 

 

 

143,359,357

 

 

 

171,509,357

 

 

 

(53,491,733

)

 

 

118,017,624

 

 

 

 

455 Eye Street

 

Washington, D.C.

 

G

 

 

2017

 

 

174

 

 

 

11,941,407

 

 

 

61,418,274

 

 

 

40,682

 

 

 

11,941,407

 

 

 

61,458,956

 

 

 

73,400,363

 

 

 

(6,002,916

)

 

 

67,397,447

 

 

 

 

4701 Willard

 

Chevy Chase, MD

 

G

 

 

1966

 

 

517

 

 

 

76,921,130

 

 

 

153,947,682

 

 

 

31,235,663

 

 

 

76,921,130

 

 

 

185,183,345

 

 

 

262,104,475

 

 

 

(67,153,478

)

 

 

194,950,997

 

 

 

 

4885 Edgemoor Lane

 

Bethesda, MD

 

 

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,864,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,864,626

 

 

 

10,864,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,864,626

 

 

 

 

4th and Hill

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

13,131,456

 

 

 

16,680,349

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,131,456

 

 

 

16,680,349

 

 

 

29,811,805

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,811,805

 

 

 

 

600 Washington

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2004

 

 

135

 

 

 

32,852,000

 

 

 

43,140,551

 

 

 

1,548,076

 

 

 

32,852,000

 

 

 

44,688,627

 

 

 

77,540,627

 

 

 

(22,331,625

)

 

 

55,209,002

 

 

 

 

660 Washington (fka Boston Common)

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

2006

 

 

420

 

 

 

106,100,000

 

 

 

166,311,679

 

 

 

4,730,410

 

 

 

106,100,000

 

 

 

171,042,089

 

 

 

277,142,089

 

 

 

(46,949,010

)

 

 

230,193,079

 

 

 

 

70 Greene

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

G

 

 

2010

 

 

480

 

 

 

28,108,899

 

 

 

236,763,553

 

 

 

2,932,277

 

 

 

28,108,899

 

 

 

239,695,830

 

 

 

267,804,729

 

 

 

(81,879,133

)

 

 

185,925,596

 

 

 

 

71 Broadway

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1997

 

 

238

 

 

 

22,611,600

 

 

 

77,492,171

 

 

 

17,054,425

 

 

 

22,611,600

 

 

 

94,546,596

 

 

 

117,158,196

 

 

 

(51,104,697

)

 

 

66,053,499

 

 

 

 

77 Bluxome

 

San Francisco, CA

 

 

 

 

2007

 

 

102

 

 

 

5,249,124

 

 

 

18,609,876

 

 

 

479,898

 

 

 

5,249,124

 

 

 

19,089,774

 

 

 

24,338,898

 

 

 

(6,408,288

)

 

 

17,930,610

 

 

 

 

77 Park Avenue (fka Hoboken)

 

Hoboken, NJ

 

G

 

 

2000

 

 

301

 

 

 

27,900,000

 

 

 

168,992,440

 

 

 

7,688,560

 

 

 

27,900,000

 

 

 

176,681,000

 

 

 

204,581,000

 

 

 

(47,768,422

)

 

 

156,812,578

 

 

 

 

777 Sixth

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2002

 

 

294

 

 

 

65,352,706

 

 

 

65,747,294

 

 

 

4,999,856

 

 

 

65,352,706

 

 

 

70,747,150

 

 

 

136,099,856

 

 

 

(30,672,075

)

 

 

105,427,781

 

 

 

 

88 Hillside

 

Daly City, CA

 

G

 

 

2011

 

 

95

 

 

 

7,786,800

 

 

 

31,587,325

 

 

 

3,225,899

 

 

 

7,786,800

 

 

 

34,813,224

 

 

 

42,600,024

 

 

 

(11,434,181

)

 

 

31,165,843

 

 

 

 

855 Brannan

 

San Francisco, CA

 

G

 

 

2018

 

 

449

 

 

 

41,363,921

 

 

 

282,107,685

 

 

 

62,476

 

 

 

41,363,921

 

 

 

282,170,161

 

 

 

323,534,082

 

 

 

(23,429,467

)

 

 

300,104,615

 

 

 

 

929 Mass (fka 929 House)

 

Cambridge, MA

 

G

 

 

1975

 

 

127

 

 

 

3,252,993

 

 

 

21,745,595

 

 

 

7,695,575

 

 

 

3,252,993

 

 

 

29,441,170

 

 

 

32,694,163

 

 

 

(19,893,418

)

 

 

12,800,745

 

 

 

 

Academy Village

 

North Hollywood, CA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

248

 

 

 

25,000,000

 

 

 

23,593,194

 

 

 

9,821,339

 

 

 

25,000,000

 

 

 

33,414,533

 

 

 

58,414,533

 

 

 

(20,345,297

)

 

 

38,069,236

 

 

 

 

Acappella

 

Pasadena, CA

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

143

 

 

 

5,839,548

 

 

 

29,360,452

 

 

 

2,301,628

 

 

 

5,839,548

 

 

 

31,662,080

 

 

 

37,501,628

 

 

 

(12,293,107

)

 

 

25,208,521

 

 

 

 

Acton Courtyard

 

Berkeley, CA

 

G

 

 

2003

 

 

71

 

 

 

5,550,000

 

 

 

15,785,509

 

 

 

396,492

 

 

 

5,550,000

 

 

 

16,182,001

 

 

 

21,732,001

 

 

 

(7,612,133

)

 

 

14,119,868

 

 

 

 

Alban Towers

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

1934

 

 

229

 

 

 

18,900,000

 

 

 

89,794,201

 

 

 

6,474,195

 

 

 

18,900,000

 

 

 

96,268,396

 

 

 

115,168,396

 

 

 

(25,786,581

)

 

 

89,381,815

 

 

 

 

Alborada

 

Fremont, CA

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

442

 

 

 

24,310,000

 

 

 

59,214,129

 

 

 

9,528,299

 

 

 

24,310,000

 

 

 

68,742,428

 

 

 

93,052,428

 

 

 

(44,468,172

)

 

 

48,584,256

 

 

 

 

Alcott Apartments (fka West End Tower)

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

10,424,000

 

 

 

128,885,729

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,424,000

 

 

 

128,885,729

 

 

 

139,309,729

 

 

 

 

 

 

139,309,729

 

 

 

 

Altitude (fka Village at Howard Hughes, The (Lots 1 & 2))

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

545

 

 

 

43,783,485

 

 

 

150,235,905

 

 

 

493,024

 

 

 

43,783,485

 

 

 

150,728,929

 

 

 

194,512,414

 

 

 

(20,615,169

)

 

 

173,897,245

 

 

 

 

Alton, The (fka Millikan)

 

Irvine, CA

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

344

 

 

 

11,049,027

 

 

 

96,526,323

 

 

 

150,438

 

 

 

11,049,027

 

 

 

96,676,761

 

 

 

107,725,788

 

 

 

(11,346,591

)

 

 

96,379,197

 

 

 

 

Arbor Terrace

 

Sunnyvale, CA

 

 

 

 

1979

 

 

175

 

 

 

9,057,300

 

 

 

18,483,642

 

 

 

11,357,865

 

 

 

9,057,300

 

 

 

29,841,507

 

 

 

38,898,807

 

 

 

(17,937,496

)

 

 

20,961,311

 

 

 

 

Arches, The

 

Sunnyvale, CA

 

 

 

 

1974

 

 

410

 

 

 

26,650,000

 

 

 

62,850,000

 

 

 

2,623,168

 

 

 

26,650,000

 

 

 

65,473,168

 

 

 

92,123,168

 

 

 

(24,870,049

)

 

 

67,253,119

 

 

 

 

Description   Initial Cost to Company Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Improvements, net) (E) Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period 12/31/16        
Apartment NameLocation Retail/Commercial Space  Date of Construction Apartment Units (H) Land  Building & Fixtures Building & Fixtures Land Building & Fixtures (A) Total (B)Accumulated Depreciation (C)Investment in Real Estate, Net at 12/31/16 Encumbrances
Wholly Owned Unencumbered:                         
100 K StreetWashington, D.C.  (F) 
 $15,600,000
 $10,782,320
 $
 $15,600,000
 $10,782,320
 $26,382,320
 $
 $26,382,320
 $
140 Riverside BoulevardNew York, NY G 2003 354
 103,539,100
 94,082,725
 6,750,405
 103,539,100
 100,833,130
 204,372,230
 (41,010,422) 163,361,808
 
160 Riverside BoulevardNew York, NY G 2001 455
 139,933,500
 190,964,745
 12,780,175
 139,933,500
 203,744,920
 343,678,420
 (81,836,307) 261,842,113
 
170 AmsterdamNew York, NY G 2015 236
 
 111,872,438
 60,750
 
 111,933,188
 111,933,188
 (7,014,736) 104,918,452
 
175 KentBrooklyn, NY G 2011 113
 22,037,831
 53,962,169
 1,396,338
 22,037,831
 55,358,507
 77,396,338
 (12,584,288) 64,812,050
 
180 Montague (fka Brooklyn Heights)Brooklyn, NY G 2000 193
 32,400,000
 92,675,228
 2,910,862
 32,400,000
 95,586,090
 127,986,090
 (16,638,099) 111,347,991
 
180 Riverside BoulevardNew York, NY G 1998 516
 144,968,250
 138,346,681
 11,344,206
 144,968,250
 149,690,887
 294,659,137
 (61,661,842) 232,997,295
 
1111 Belle Pre (fka The Madison)Alexandria, VA G 2014 360
 18,937,702
 94,758,679
 101,850
 18,937,702
 94,860,529
 113,798,231
 (12,803,962) 100,994,269
 
1210 MassWashington, D.C. G 2004 144
 9,213,513
 36,559,189
 2,112,056
 9,213,513
 38,671,245
 47,884,758
 (15,416,324) 32,468,434
 
1401 E. MadisonSeattle, WA  (F) 
 10,401,958
 4,932,954
 
 10,401,958
 4,932,954
 15,334,912
 
 15,334,912
 
1500 Mass AveWashington, D.C. G 1951 556
 54,638,298
 40,361,702
 14,505,801
 54,638,298
 54,867,503
 109,505,801
 (21,697,139) 87,808,662
 
1800 Oak (fka Rosslyn)Arlington, VA G 2003 314
 31,400,000
 109,005,734
 2,999,587
 31,400,000
 112,005,321
 143,405,321
 (19,795,492) 123,609,829
 
2201 Pershing DriveArlington, VA G 2012 188
 11,321,198
 49,674,175
 2,103,036
 11,321,198
 51,777,211
 63,098,409
 (9,394,581) 53,703,828
 
2201 WilsonArlington, VA G 2000 219
 21,900,000
 78,724,663
 2,390,730
 21,900,000
 81,115,393
 103,015,393
 (13,936,506) 89,078,887
 
2400 M StWashington, D.C. G 2006 359
 30,006,593
 114,013,785
 4,082,076
 30,006,593
 118,095,861
 148,102,454
 (45,418,266) 102,684,188
 
315 on ABoston, MA G 2013 202
 14,450,070
 115,824,930
 517,562
 14,450,070
 116,342,492
 130,792,562
 (10,319,919) 120,472,643
 
340 Fremont (fka Rincon Hill)San Francisco, CA  2016 348
 42,000,000
 244,995,446
 88
 42,000,000
 244,995,534
 286,995,534
 (4,611,169) 282,384,365
 
3003 Van Ness (fka Van Ness)Washington, D.C.  1970 625
 56,300,000
 141,191,580
 4,018,369
 56,300,000
 145,209,949
 201,509,949
 (27,557,126) 173,952,823
 
45 Worthington (CityView II)Boston, MA  (F) 
 
 2,058,673
 
 
 2,058,673
 2,058,673
 
 2,058,673
 
420 East 80th StreetNew York, NY  1961 155
 39,277,000
 23,026,984
 4,252,598
 39,277,000
 27,279,582
 66,556,582
 (12,559,376) 53,997,206
 
425 MassWashington, D.C. G 2009 559
 28,150,000
 138,600,000
 3,740,413
 28,150,000
 142,340,413
 170,490,413
 (39,542,039) 130,948,374
 
455 Eye StreetWashington, D.C. G (F) 
 12,762,857
 45,794,997
 
 12,762,857
 45,794,997
 58,557,854
 
 58,557,854
 
4885 Edgemoor LaneBethesda, MD  (F) 
 
 1,237,673
 
 
 1,237,673
 1,237,673
 
 1,237,673
 
4th and HillLos Angeles, CA  (F) 
 13,131,456
 11,144,682
 
 13,131,456
 11,144,682
 24,276,138
 
 24,276,138
 
600 WashingtonNew York, NY G 2004 135
 32,852,000
 43,140,551
 734,411
 32,852,000
 43,874,962
 76,726,962
 (17,905,409) 58,821,553
 
660 Washington (fka Boston Common)Boston, MA G 2006 420
 106,100,000
 166,311,679
 2,325,428
 106,100,000
 168,637,107
 274,737,107
 (29,635,573) 245,101,534
 
70 GreeneJersey City, NJ G 2010 480
 28,108,899
 236,763,553
 1,103,051
 28,108,899
 237,866,604
 265,975,503
 (57,907,087) 208,068,416
 
71 BroadwayNew York, NY G 1997 238
 22,611,600
 77,492,171
 12,799,538
 22,611,600
 90,291,709
 112,903,309
 (39,723,414) 73,179,895
 
77 BluxomeSan Francisco, CA  2007 102
 5,249,124
 18,609,876
 264,502
 5,249,124
 18,874,378
 24,123,502
 (4,400,965) 19,722,537
 
77 Park Avenue (fka Hoboken)Hoboken, NJ G 2000 301
 27,900,000
 168,992,440
 5,319,200
 27,900,000
 174,311,640
 202,211,640
 (28,587,488) 173,624,152
 
777 SixthNew York, NY G 2002 294
 65,352,706
 65,747,294
 1,975,718
 65,352,706
 67,723,012
 133,075,718
 (24,056,905) 109,018,813
 
88 HillsideDaly City, CA G 2011 95
 7,786,800
 31,587,325
 1,965,143
 7,786,800
 33,552,468
 41,339,268
 (7,400,305) 33,938,963
 
855 BrannanSan Francisco, CA G (F) 
 41,363,921
 166,903,627
 
 41,363,921
 166,903,627
 208,267,548
 
 208,267,548
 
Acton CourtyardBerkeley, CA G 2003 71
 5,550,000
 15,785,509
 199,531
 5,550,000
 15,985,040
 21,535,040
 (6,078,896) 15,456,144
 
Alban TowersWashington, D.C.  1934 229
 18,900,000
 89,794,201
 1,712,897
 18,900,000
 91,507,098
 110,407,098
 (15,639,767) 94,767,331
 
Altitude (fka Village at Howard Hughes, The (Lots 1 & 2))Los Angeles, CA  2016 545
 43,783,485
 147,918,661
 25,744
 43,783,485
 147,944,405
 191,727,890
 (2,490,933) 189,236,957
 
Alton, The (fka Millikan)Irvine, CA  (F) 
 11,049,027
 90,857,975
 
 11,049,027
 90,857,975
 101,907,002
 
 101,907,002
 
Arbor TerraceSunnyvale, CA  1979 175
 9,057,300
 18,483,642
 4,162,140
 9,057,300
 22,645,782
 31,703,082
 (13,943,284) 17,759,798
 
Artech BuildingBerkeley, CA G 2002 27
 1,642,000
 9,152,518
 329,292
 1,642,000
 9,481,810
 11,123,810
 (3,371,389) 7,752,421
 
Artisan on SecondLos Angeles, CA  2008 118
 8,000,400
 36,074,600
 670,299
 8,000,400
 36,744,899
 44,745,299
 (9,258,909) 35,486,390
 
Artistry Emeryville (fka Emeryville)Emeryville, CA  1994 261
 12,300,000
 61,466,267
 2,277,634
 12,300,000
 63,743,901
 76,043,901
 (12,191,117) 63,852,784
 
AtelierBrooklyn, NY  2015 120
 32,401,680
 47,135,432
 90,854
 32,401,680
 47,226,286
 79,627,966
 (3,149,449) 76,478,517
 
Avenue TwoRedwood City, CA  1972 123
 7,995,000
 18,005,000
 1,749,322
 7,995,000
 19,754,322
 27,749,322
 (5,134,751) 22,614,571
 
Azure (fka Mission Bay-Block 13)San Francisco, CA  2015 273
 32,855,115
 152,254,155
 26,494
 32,855,115
 152,280,649
 185,135,764
 (7,791,579) 177,344,185
 
Bay HillLong Beach, CA  2002 160
 7,600,000
 27,437,239
 2,909,175
 7,600,000
 30,346,414
 37,946,414
 (13,103,323) 24,843,091
 
Beatrice, TheNew York, NY G 2010 302
 114,351,405
 165,648,595
 1,000,140
 114,351,405
 166,648,735
 281,000,140
 (35,148,328) 245,851,812
 
Belle Arts Condominium Homes, LLCBellevue, WA  2000 1
 63,158
 248,928
 (5,320) 63,158
 243,608
 306,766
 
 306,766
 

S-4



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 20162019

Description

 

 

Initial Cost to

Company

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Acquisition

(Improvements,

net) (E)

 

 

Gross Amount Carried at

Close of Period 12/31/19

 

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Retail/

Commercial

Space

 

 

Date of

Construction

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures (A)

 

 

Total (B)

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation (C)

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net at

12/31/19

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Artisan on Second

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

2008

 

 

118

 

 

 

8,000,400

 

 

 

36,074,600

 

 

 

1,173,462

 

 

 

8,000,400

 

 

 

37,248,062

 

 

 

45,248,462

 

 

 

(12,924,017

)

 

 

32,324,445

 

 

 

 

Artisan Square

 

Northridge, CA

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

140

 

 

 

7,000,000

 

 

 

20,537,359

 

 

 

1,889,100

 

 

 

7,000,000

 

 

 

22,426,459

 

 

 

29,426,459

 

 

 

(13,116,756

)

 

 

16,309,703

 

 

 

 

Artistry Emeryville (fka Emeryville)

 

Emeryville, CA

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

267

 

 

 

12,300,000

 

 

 

61,466,267

 

 

 

7,189,056

 

 

 

12,300,000

 

 

 

68,655,323

 

 

 

80,955,323

 

 

 

(20,908,096

)

 

 

60,047,227

 

 

 

 

Atelier

 

Brooklyn, NY

 

G

 

 

2015

 

 

120

 

 

 

32,401,680

 

 

 

47,135,432

 

 

 

432,778

 

 

 

32,401,680

 

 

 

47,568,210

 

 

 

79,969,890

 

 

 

(8,426,826

)

 

 

71,543,064

 

 

 

 

Avenue Two

 

Redwood City, CA

 

 

 

 

1972

 

 

123

 

 

 

7,995,000

 

 

 

18,005,000

 

 

 

2,417,128

 

 

 

7,995,000

 

 

 

20,422,128

 

 

 

28,417,128

 

 

 

(7,587,499

)

 

 

20,829,629

 

 

 

 

Axis at Shady Grove

 

Rockville, MD

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

366

 

 

 

14,745,774

 

 

 

90,503,831

 

 

 

123,658

 

 

 

14,745,774

 

 

 

90,627,489

 

 

 

105,373,263

 

 

 

(6,627,790

)

 

 

98,745,473

 

 

 

 

Azure (fka Mission Bay-Block 13)

 

San Francisco, CA

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

273

 

 

 

32,855,115

 

 

 

153,569,655

 

 

 

385,653

 

 

 

32,855,115

 

 

 

153,955,308

 

 

 

186,810,423

 

 

 

(25,110,173

)

 

 

161,700,250

 

 

 

 

Bay Hill

 

Long Beach, CA

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

160

 

 

 

7,600,000

 

 

 

27,437,239

 

 

 

3,648,128

 

 

 

7,600,000

 

 

 

31,085,367

 

 

 

38,685,367

 

 

 

(16,705,166

)

 

 

21,980,201

 

 

 

 

Beatrice, The

 

New York, NY

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

302

 

 

 

114,351,405

 

 

 

165,648,595

 

 

 

1,852,511

 

 

 

114,351,405

 

 

 

167,501,106

 

 

 

281,852,511

 

 

 

(51,586,536

)

 

 

230,265,975

 

 

 

 

Bella Vista I, II, III Combined

 

Woodland Hills, CA

 

 

 

 

2003-2007

 

 

579

 

 

 

31,682,754

 

 

 

121,095,786

 

 

 

10,564,320

 

 

 

31,682,754

 

 

 

131,660,106

 

 

 

163,342,860

 

 

 

(63,397,900

)

 

 

99,944,960

 

 

 

 

Belle Arts Condominium Homes, LLC

 

Bellevue, WA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

1

 

 

 

63,158

 

 

 

236,157

 

 

 

2,098

 

 

 

63,158

 

 

 

238,255

 

 

 

301,413

 

 

 

(91,640

)

 

 

209,773

 

 

 

 

Belle Fontaine

 

Marina Del Rey, CA

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

102

 

 

 

9,098,808

 

 

 

28,701,192

 

 

 

2,077,210

 

 

 

9,098,808

 

 

 

30,778,402

 

 

 

39,877,210

 

 

 

(9,929,838

)

 

 

29,947,372

 

 

 

 

Breakwater at Marina Del Rey

 

Marina Del Rey, CA

 

 

 

 

1964-1969

 

 

224

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,189,262

 

 

 

2,301,977

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,491,239

 

 

 

75,491,239

 

 

 

(22,556,033

)

 

 

52,935,206

 

 

 

 

Briarwood (CA)

 

Sunnyvale, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

192

 

 

 

9,991,500

 

 

 

22,247,278

 

 

 

4,223,652

 

 

 

9,991,500

 

 

 

26,470,930

 

 

 

36,462,430

 

 

 

(19,003,418

)

 

 

17,459,012

 

 

 

 

Brodie, The

 

Westminster, CO

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

312

 

 

 

8,639,904

 

 

 

79,254,009

 

 

 

338,241

 

 

 

8,639,904

 

 

 

79,592,250

 

 

 

88,232,154

 

 

 

(4,390,121

)

 

 

83,842,033

 

 

 

 

Brooklyner, The (fka 111 Lawrence)

 

Brooklyn, NY

 

G

 

 

2010

 

 

490

 

 

 

40,099,922

 

 

 

221,438,631

 

 

 

4,272,230

 

 

 

40,099,922

 

 

 

225,710,861

 

 

 

265,810,783

 

 

 

(69,755,616

)

 

 

196,055,167

 

 

 

 

C on Pico

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

94

 

 

 

17,125,766

 

 

 

28,074,234

 

 

 

468,094

 

 

 

17,125,766

 

 

 

28,542,328

 

 

 

45,668,094

 

 

 

(4,917,365

)

 

 

40,750,729

 

 

 

 

Carlyle Mill

 

Alexandria, VA

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

317

 

 

 

10,000,000

 

 

 

51,367,913

 

 

 

9,043,657

 

 

 

10,000,000

 

 

 

60,411,570

 

 

 

70,411,570

 

 

 

(34,997,308

)

 

 

35,414,262

 

 

 

 

Carmel Terrace

 

San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

1988-1989

 

 

384

 

 

 

2,288,300

 

 

 

20,596,281

 

 

 

12,519,325

 

 

 

2,288,300

 

 

 

33,115,606

 

 

 

35,403,906

 

 

 

(28,576,803

)

 

 

6,827,103

 

 

 

 

Cascade

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2017

 

 

477

 

 

 

23,751,564

 

 

 

149,388,658

 

 

 

10,060

 

 

 

23,751,564

 

 

 

149,398,718

 

 

 

173,150,282

 

 

 

(14,329,011

)

 

 

158,821,271

 

 

 

 

Centennial (fka Centennial Court & Centennial Tower)

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

1991/2001

 

 

408

 

 

 

9,700,000

 

 

 

70,080,378

 

 

 

13,065,205

 

 

 

9,700,000

 

 

 

83,145,583

 

 

 

92,845,583

 

 

 

(43,852,523

)

 

 

48,993,060

 

 

 

 

Centre Club Combined

 

Ontario, CA

 

 

 

 

1994 & 2002

 

 

412

 

 

 

7,436,000

 

 

 

33,014,789

 

 

 

9,490,814

 

 

 

7,436,000

 

 

 

42,505,603

 

 

 

49,941,603

 

 

 

(26,716,928

)

 

 

23,224,675

 

 

 

 

Chloe on Madison (fka 1401 E. Madison)

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2019

 

 

137

 

 

 

10,401,958

 

 

 

52,593,395

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,401,958

 

 

 

52,593,395

 

 

 

62,995,353

 

 

 

(497,660

)

 

 

62,497,693

 

 

 

 

Chloe on Union (fka Chloe)

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2010

 

 

117

 

 

 

14,835,571

 

 

 

39,359,650

 

 

 

2,516,557

 

 

 

14,835,571

 

 

 

41,876,207

 

 

 

56,711,778

 

 

 

(4,541,342

)

 

 

52,170,436

 

 

 

 

Church Corner

 

Cambridge, MA

 

G

 

 

1987

 

 

85

 

 

 

5,220,000

 

 

 

16,744,643

 

 

 

3,270,549

 

 

 

5,220,000

 

 

 

20,015,192

 

 

 

25,235,192

 

 

 

(10,988,447

)

 

 

14,246,745

 

 

 

 

City Gate at Cupertino (fka Cupertino)

 

Cupertino, CA

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

311

 

 

 

40,400,000

 

 

 

95,937,046

 

 

 

7,548,015

 

 

 

40,400,000

 

 

 

103,485,061

 

 

 

143,885,061

 

 

 

(29,361,079

)

 

 

114,523,982

 

 

 

 

City Pointe

 

Fullerton, CA

 

G

 

 

2004

 

 

183

 

 

 

6,863,792

 

 

 

36,476,208

 

 

 

3,588,233

 

 

 

6,863,792

 

 

 

40,064,441

 

 

 

46,928,233

 

 

 

(15,519,206

)

 

 

31,409,027

 

 

 

 

City Square Bellevue (fka Bellevue)

 

Bellevue, WA

 

G

 

 

1998

 

 

191

 

 

 

15,100,000

 

 

 

41,876,257

 

 

 

3,873,050

 

 

 

15,100,000

 

 

 

45,749,307

 

 

 

60,849,307

 

 

 

(13,419,667

)

 

 

47,429,640

 

 

 

 

Clarendon, The

 

Arlington, VA

 

G

 

 

2005

 

 

292

 

 

 

30,400,340

 

 

 

103,824,660

 

 

 

2,674,009

 

 

 

30,400,340

 

 

 

106,498,669

 

 

 

136,899,009

 

 

 

(36,985,746

)

 

 

99,913,263

 

 

 

 

Cleo, The

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

92

 

 

 

6,615,467

 

 

 

14,829,335

 

 

 

4,079,934

 

 

 

6,615,467

 

 

 

18,909,269

 

 

 

25,524,736

 

 

 

(9,776,697

)

 

 

15,748,039

 

 

 

 

Connecticut Heights

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

1974

 

 

518

 

 

 

27,600,000

 

 

 

114,002,295

 

 

 

10,060,643

 

 

 

27,600,000

 

 

 

124,062,938

 

 

 

151,662,938

 

 

 

(33,971,504

)

 

 

117,691,434

 

 

 

 

Corcoran House at DuPont Circle (fka DuPont Circle)

 

Washington, D.C.

 

G

 

 

1961

 

 

138

 

 

 

13,500,000

 

 

 

26,913,113

 

 

 

2,637,933

 

 

 

13,500,000

 

 

 

29,551,046

 

 

 

43,051,046

 

 

 

(9,012,285

)

 

 

34,038,761

 

 

 

 

Courthouse Plaza

 

Arlington, VA

 

G

 

 

1990

 

 

396

 

 

 

 

 

 

87,386,024

 

 

 

6,316,702

 

 

 

 

 

 

93,702,726

 

 

 

93,702,726

 

 

 

(28,408,921

)

 

 

65,293,805

 

 

 

 

Creekside (San Mateo)

 

San Mateo, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

192

 

 

 

9,606,600

 

 

 

21,193,232

 

 

 

4,951,801

 

 

 

9,606,600

 

 

 

26,145,033

 

 

 

35,751,633

 

 

 

(18,907,735

)

 

 

16,843,898

 

 

 

 

Cronins Landing

 

Waltham, MA

 

G

 

 

1998

 

 

281

 

 

 

32,300,000

 

 

 

85,119,324

 

 

 

11,972,290

 

 

 

32,300,000

 

 

 

97,091,614

 

 

 

129,391,614

 

 

 

(27,201,943

)

 

 

102,189,671

 

 

 

 

Crystal Place

 

Arlington, VA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

181

 

 

 

17,200,000

 

 

 

47,918,975

 

 

 

3,946,812

 

 

 

17,200,000

 

 

 

51,865,787

 

 

 

69,065,787

 

 

 

(15,614,718

)

 

 

53,451,069

 

 

 

 

Dalton, The

 

Alexandria, VA

 

G

 

 

2018

 

 

270

 

 

 

22,947,777

 

 

 

95,292,515

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

22,947,777

 

 

 

95,292,509

 

 

 

118,240,286

 

 

 

 

 

 

118,240,286

 

 

 

 

Deerwood (SD)

 

San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

316

 

 

 

2,082,095

 

 

 

18,739,815

 

 

 

15,675,022

 

 

 

2,082,095

 

 

 

34,414,837

 

 

 

36,496,932

 

 

 

(30,453,714

)

 

 

6,043,218

 

 

 

 

Del Mar Ridge

 

San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

181

 

 

 

7,801,824

 

 

 

36,948,176

 

 

 

4,246,225

 

 

 

7,801,824

 

 

 

41,194,401

 

 

 

48,996,225

 

 

 

(17,680,819

)

 

 

31,315,406

 

 

 

 

Eagle Canyon

 

Chino Hills, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

252

 

 

 

1,808,900

 

 

 

16,274,361

 

 

 

10,865,978

 

 

 

1,808,900

 

 

 

27,140,339

 

 

 

28,949,239

 

 

 

(20,747,510

)

 

 

8,201,729

 

 

 

 

Edgemont at Bethesda Metro

 

Bethesda, MD

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

122

 

 

 

13,092,552

 

 

 

43,907,448

 

 

 

1,674,370

 

 

 

13,092,552

 

 

 

45,581,818

 

 

 

58,674,370

 

 

 

(15,155,907

)

 

 

43,518,463

 

 

 

 

Emerson Place

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

1962

 

 

444

 

 

 

14,855,000

 

 

 

57,566,636

 

 

 

35,014,249

 

 

 

14,855,000

 

 

 

92,580,885

 

 

 

107,435,885

 

 

 

(63,325,270

)

 

 

44,110,615

 

 

 

 

Encore at Sherman Oaks, The

 

Sherman Oaks, CA

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

174

 

 

 

8,700,000

 

 

 

25,446,003

 

 

 

3,847,449

 

 

 

8,700,000

 

 

 

29,293,452

 

 

 

37,993,452

 

 

 

(10,801,336

)

 

 

27,192,116

 

 

 

 

Eviva on Cherokee

 

Denver, CO

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

274

 

 

 

10,507,626

 

 

 

100,037,204

 

 

 

151,235

 

 

 

10,507,626

 

 

 

100,188,439

 

 

 

110,696,065

 

 

 

(6,553,585

)

 

 

104,142,480

 

 

 

 

Description   Initial Cost to Company  Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(Improvements, net) (E) Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period 12/31/16        
Apartment NameLocation Retail/Commercial Space  Date of Construction Apartment Units (H) Land  Building & Fixtures Building & Fixtures Land Building & Fixtures (A) Total (B)Accumulated Depreciation (C)Investment in Real Estate, Net at 12/31/16 Encumbrances
Belle FontaineMarina Del Rey, CA  2003 102
 9,098,808
 28,701,192
 683,777
 9,098,808
 29,384,969
 38,483,777
 (6,820,566) 31,663,211
 
Breakwater at Marina Del ReyMarina Del Rey, CA  1964-1969 224
 
 73,189,262
 1,050,136
 
 74,239,398
 74,239,398
 (14,067,543) 60,171,855
 
Briarwood (CA)Sunnyvale, CA  1985 192
 9,991,500
 22,247,278
 3,599,062
 9,991,500
 25,846,340
 35,837,840
 (15,933,244) 19,904,596
 
Bridford Lakes IIGreensboro, NC  (F) 
 1,100,564
 792,508
 
 1,100,564
 792,508
 1,893,072
 
 1,893,072
 
Brooklyner, The (fka 111 Lawrence)Brooklyn, NY G 2010 490
 40,099,922
 221,438,631
 1,827,017
 40,099,922
 223,265,648
 263,365,570
 (46,337,376) 217,028,194
 
C on PicoLos Angeles, CA  2014 94
 17,125,766
 28,074,234
 7,841
 17,125,766
 28,082,075
 45,207,841
 (978,707) 44,229,134
 
Cambridge ParkCambridge, MA G 2002 312
 31,200,000
 106,048,587
 4,107,045
 31,200,000
 110,155,632
 141,355,632
 (19,695,291) 121,660,341
 
Carlyle MillAlexandria, VA  2002 317
 10,000,000
 51,367,913
 7,872,672
 10,000,000
 59,240,585
 69,240,585
 (28,386,923) 40,853,662
 
CascadeSeattle, WA G (F) 
 23,751,564
 99,710,750
 
 23,751,564
 99,710,750
 123,462,314
 
 123,462,314
 
Centennial (fka Centennial Court & Centennial Tower)Seattle, WA G 1991/2001 408
 9,700,000
 70,080,378
 10,056,055
 9,700,000
 80,136,433
 89,836,433
 (33,705,547) 56,130,886
 
Centre Club CombinedOntario, CA  1994 & 2002 412
 7,436,000
 33,014,789
 7,413,964
 7,436,000
 40,428,753
 47,864,753
 (21,574,006) 26,290,747
 
Church CornerCambridge, MA G 1987 85
 5,220,000
 16,744,643
 2,266,923
 5,220,000
 19,011,566
 24,231,566
 (8,540,355) 15,691,211
 
City Gate at Cupertino (fka Cupertino)Cupertino, CA  1998 311
 40,400,000
 95,937,046
 5,626,705
 40,400,000
 101,563,751
 141,963,751
 (17,548,498) 124,415,253
 
City PointeFullerton, CA G 2004 183
 6,863,792
 36,476,208
 857,946
 6,863,792
 37,334,154
 44,197,946
 (11,712,818) 32,485,128
 
City Square Bellevue (fka Bellevue)Bellevue, WA G 1998 191
 15,100,000
 41,876,257
 3,126,524
 15,100,000
 45,002,781
 60,102,781
 (7,953,824) 52,148,957
 
CityView at LongwoodBoston, MA G 1970 295
 14,704,898
 79,195,102
 10,574,412
 14,704,898
 89,769,514
 104,474,412
 (25,961,856) 78,512,556
 
Clarendon, TheArlington, VA G 2005 292
 30,400,340
 103,824,660
 2,143,113
 30,400,340
 105,967,773
 136,368,113
 (26,624,877) 109,743,236
 
Cleo, TheLos Angeles, CA  1989 92
 6,615,467
 14,829,335
 3,832,717
 6,615,467
 18,662,052
 25,277,519
 (8,171,402) 17,106,117
 
Connecticut HeightsWashington, D.C.  1974 518
 27,600,000
 114,002,295
 4,856,602
 27,600,000
 118,858,897
 146,458,897
 (20,124,977) 126,333,920
 
Corcoran House at DuPont Circle (fka DuPont Circle)Washington, D.C. G 1961 138
 13,500,000
 26,913,113
 1,796,515
 13,500,000
 28,709,628
 42,209,628
 (5,801,661) 36,407,967
 
Courthouse PlazaArlington, VA G 1990 396
 
 87,386,024
 4,635,703
 
 92,021,727
 92,021,727
 (17,966,254) 74,055,473
 
Creekside (San Mateo)San Mateo, CA  1985 192
 9,606,600
 21,193,231
 4,013,129
 9,606,600
 25,206,360
 34,812,960
 (15,771,922) 19,041,038
 
Cronins LandingWaltham, MA G 1998 281
 32,300,000
 85,119,324
 3,914,279
 32,300,000
 89,033,603
 121,333,603
 (15,979,321) 105,354,282
 
Crystal PlaceArlington, VA  1986 181
 17,200,000
 47,918,975
 3,157,515
 17,200,000
 51,076,490
 68,276,490
 (9,260,208) 59,016,282
 
Eagle CanyonChino Hills, CA  1985 252
 1,808,900
 16,274,361
 8,800,432
 1,808,900
 25,074,793
 26,883,693
 (17,314,590) 9,569,103
 
Edgemont at Bethesda MetroBethesda, MD  1989 122
 13,092,552
 43,907,448
 1,125,457
 13,092,552
 45,032,905
 58,125,457
 (10,423,583) 47,701,874
 
ElevéGlendale, CA G 2013 208
 14,080,560
 56,419,440
 415,204
 14,080,560
 56,834,644
 70,915,204
 (7,584,216) 63,330,988
 
Emerson PlaceBoston, MA G 1962 444
 14,855,000
 57,566,636
 22,690,975
 14,855,000
 80,257,611
 95,112,611
 (52,167,424) 42,945,187
 
Encinitas Heights (fka Encinitas)Encinitas, CA G 2002 120
 12,000,000
 29,207,497
 617,199
 12,000,000
 29,824,696
 41,824,696
 (5,889,783) 35,934,913
 
Encore at Sherman Oaks, TheSherman Oaks, CA  1988 174
 8,700,000
 25,446,003
 1,211,820
 8,700,000
 26,657,823
 35,357,823
 (7,869,084) 27,488,739
 
Fountains at Emerald Park (fka Emerald Park)Dublin, CA  2000 324
 25,900,000
 83,986,217
 927,144
 25,900,000
 84,913,361
 110,813,361
 (15,751,998) 95,061,363
 
Fremont CenterFremont, CA G 2002 322
 25,800,000
 78,753,114
 2,733,097
 25,800,000
 81,486,211
 107,286,211
 (14,742,488) 92,543,723
 
Gallery, TheHermosa Beach, CA  1971 169
 18,144,000
 46,567,941
 2,651,435
 18,144,000
 49,219,376
 67,363,376
 (19,871,531) 47,491,845
 
Garden GarageBoston, MA  (F) 
 
 4,917,373
 
 
 4,917,373
 4,917,373
 
 4,917,373
 
Gateway at Malden CenterMalden, MA G 1988 203
 9,209,780
 25,722,666
 13,834,746
 9,209,780
 39,557,412
 48,767,192
 (21,301,983) 27,465,209
 
Geary Court YardSan Francisco, CA  1990 164
 1,722,400
 15,471,429
 4,477,710
 1,722,400
 19,949,139
 21,671,539
 (12,574,169) 9,097,370
 
Glen MeadowFranklin, MA  1971 288
 2,339,331
 16,133,588
 4,347,422
 2,339,331
 20,481,010
 22,820,341
 (12,813,162) 10,007,179
 
Hampshire PlaceLos Angeles, CA  1989 259
 10,806,000
 30,335,330
 4,042,761
 10,806,000
 34,378,091
 45,184,091
 (15,493,262) 29,690,829
 
Harbor StepsSeattle, WA G 2000 758
 59,387,158
 158,829,432
 20,957,019
 59,387,158
 179,786,451
 239,173,609
 (73,216,856) 165,956,753
 
Helios (fka 2nd & Pine)Seattle, WA G (F) 
 18,061,674
 162,443,822
 
 18,061,674
 162,443,822
 180,505,496
 
 180,505,496
 
Heritage at Stone RidgeBurlington, MA  2005 180
 10,800,000
 31,808,335
 1,839,852
 10,800,000
 33,648,187
 44,448,187
 (14,133,220) 30,314,967
 
Heritage RidgeLynwood, WA  1999 197
 6,895,000
 18,983,597
 1,741,466
 6,895,000
 20,725,063
 27,620,063
 (9,305,589) 18,314,474
 
HesbyNorth Hollywood, CA  2013 308
 23,299,892
 102,700,108
 323,337
 23,299,892
 103,023,445
 126,323,337
 (13,208,612) 113,114,725
 
Highlands at Cherry HillCherry Hills, NJ  2002 170
 6,800,000
 21,459,108
 1,219,837
 6,800,000
 22,678,945
 29,478,945
 (9,622,596) 19,856,349
 
Highlands at South PlainfieldSouth Plainfield, NJ  2000 252
 10,080,000
 37,526,912
 1,671,208
 10,080,000
 39,198,120
 49,278,120
 (15,870,459) 33,407,661
 
HikariLos Angeles, CA G 2007 128
 9,435,760
 32,564,240
 623,527
 9,435,760
 33,187,767
 42,623,527
 (8,254,511) 34,369,016
 
Hudson CrossingNew York, NY G 2003 259
 23,420,000
 69,977,699
 2,182,860
 23,420,000
 72,160,559
 95,580,559
 (30,934,660) 64,645,899
 
Hudson Crossing IINew York, NY  (F) 
 10,599,287
 3,293,787
 
 10,599,287
 3,293,787
 13,893,074
 
 13,893,074
 

S-5



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 20162019

Description

 

 

Initial Cost to

Company

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Acquisition

(Improvements,

net) (E)

 

 

Gross Amount Carried at

Close of Period 12/31/19

 

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Retail/

Commercial

Space

 

 

Date of

Construction

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures (A)

 

 

Total (B)

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation (C)

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net at

12/31/19

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Fountains at Emerald Park (fka Emerald Park)

 

Dublin, CA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

324

 

 

 

25,900,000

 

 

 

83,986,217

 

 

 

3,935,049

 

 

 

25,900,000

 

 

 

87,921,266

 

 

 

113,821,266

 

 

 

(25,270,333

)

 

 

88,550,933

 

 

 

 

Fremont Center

 

Fremont, CA

 

G

 

 

2002

 

 

322

 

 

 

25,800,000

 

 

 

78,753,114

 

 

 

4,490,634

 

 

 

25,800,000

 

 

 

83,243,748

 

 

 

109,043,748

 

 

 

(24,471,382

)

 

 

84,572,366

 

 

 

 

Gaithersburg Station

 

Gaithersburg, MD

 

G

 

 

2013

 

 

400

 

 

 

17,500,000

 

 

 

74,678,917

 

 

 

3,537,268

 

 

 

17,500,000

 

 

 

78,216,185

 

 

 

95,716,185

 

 

 

(20,628,153

)

 

 

75,088,032

 

 

 

 

Gallery, The

 

Hermosa Beach, CA

 

 

 

 

1971

 

 

169

 

 

 

18,144,000

 

 

 

46,567,941

 

 

 

2,995,980

 

 

 

18,144,000

 

 

 

49,563,921

 

 

 

67,707,921

 

 

 

(24,741,834

)

 

 

42,966,087

 

 

 

 

Gateway at Malden Center

 

Malden, MA

 

G

 

 

1988

 

 

203

 

 

 

9,209,780

 

 

 

25,722,666

 

 

 

16,463,954

 

 

 

9,209,780

 

 

 

42,186,620

 

 

 

51,396,400

 

 

 

(26,861,288

)

 

 

24,535,112

 

 

 

 

Geary Court Yard

 

San Francisco, CA

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

165

 

 

 

1,722,400

 

 

 

15,471,429

 

 

 

6,197,853

 

 

 

1,722,400

 

 

 

21,669,282

 

 

 

23,391,682

 

 

 

(15,406,560

)

 

 

7,985,122

 

 

 

 

Girard

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

2016

 

 

160

 

 

 

 

 

 

102,450,328

 

 

 

865,330

 

 

 

 

 

 

103,315,658

 

 

 

103,315,658

 

 

 

(11,248,402

)

 

 

92,067,256

 

 

 

 

Hampshire Place

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

259

 

 

 

10,806,000

 

 

 

30,335,330

 

 

 

8,125,571

 

 

 

10,806,000

 

 

 

38,460,901

 

 

 

49,266,901

 

 

 

(19,841,849

)

 

 

29,425,052

 

 

 

 

Harbor Steps

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2000

 

 

761

 

 

 

59,403,601

 

 

 

158,829,432

 

 

 

40,880,428

 

 

 

59,403,601

 

 

 

199,709,860

 

 

 

259,113,461

 

 

 

(97,046,373

)

 

 

162,067,088

 

 

 

 

Hathaway

 

Long Beach, CA

 

 

 

 

1987

 

 

385

 

 

 

2,512,500

 

 

 

22,611,912

 

 

 

13,674,471

 

 

 

2,512,500

 

 

 

36,286,383

 

 

 

38,798,883

 

 

 

(27,001,675

)

 

 

11,797,208

 

 

 

 

Helios (fka 2nd+Pine)

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2017

 

 

398

 

 

 

18,061,674

 

 

 

206,628,093

 

 

 

110,524

 

 

 

18,061,674

 

 

 

206,738,617

 

 

 

224,800,291

 

 

 

(20,125,380

)

 

 

204,674,911

 

 

 

 

Heritage at Stone Ridge

 

Burlington, MA

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

180

 

 

 

10,800,000

 

 

 

31,808,335

 

 

 

2,849,652

 

 

 

10,800,000

 

 

 

34,657,987

 

 

 

45,457,987

 

 

 

(17,798,543

)

 

 

27,659,444

 

 

 

 

Heritage Ridge

 

Lynwood, WA

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

197

 

 

 

6,895,000

 

 

 

18,983,597

 

 

 

4,605,503

 

 

 

6,895,000

 

 

 

23,589,100

 

 

 

30,484,100

 

 

 

(11,968,336

)

 

 

18,515,764

 

 

 

 

Hesby

 

North Hollywood, CA

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

308

 

 

 

23,299,892

 

 

 

102,700,108

 

 

 

1,653,931

 

 

 

23,299,892

 

 

 

104,354,039

 

 

 

127,653,931

 

 

 

(25,277,554

)

 

 

102,376,377

 

 

 

 

Highlands at South Plainfield

 

South Plainfield, NJ

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

252

 

 

 

10,080,000

 

 

 

37,526,912

 

 

 

2,592,223

 

 

 

10,080,000

 

 

 

40,119,135

 

 

 

50,199,135

 

 

 

(20,191,766

)

 

 

30,007,369

 

 

 

 

Hikari

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

2007

 

 

128

 

 

 

9,435,760

 

 

 

32,564,240

 

 

 

965,477

 

 

 

9,435,760

 

 

 

33,529,717

 

 

 

42,965,477

 

 

 

(11,609,215

)

 

 

31,356,262

 

 

 

 

Hudson Crossing

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2003

 

 

259

 

 

 

23,420,000

 

 

 

69,977,699

 

 

 

3,000,297

 

 

 

23,420,000

 

 

 

72,977,996

 

 

 

96,397,996

 

 

 

(38,482,671

)

 

 

57,915,325

 

 

 

 

Hudson Pointe

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

182

 

 

 

5,350,000

 

 

 

41,114,074

 

 

 

6,902,664

 

 

 

5,350,000

 

 

 

48,016,738

 

 

 

53,366,738

 

 

 

(26,064,218

)

 

 

27,302,520

 

 

 

 

Hunt Club II

 

Charlotte, NC

 

 

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

Huxley, The

 

Redwood City, CA

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

137

 

 

 

18,775,028

 

 

 

89,335,476

 

 

 

5,577

 

 

 

18,775,028

 

 

 

89,341,053

 

 

 

108,116,081

 

 

 

(2,362,663

)

 

 

105,753,418

 

 

 

 

Ivory Wood

 

Bothell, WA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

144

 

 

 

2,732,800

 

 

 

13,888,282

 

 

 

1,716,006

 

 

 

2,732,800

 

 

 

15,604,288

 

 

 

18,337,088

 

 

 

(8,531,839

)

 

 

9,805,249

 

 

 

 

Jia (fka Chinatown Gateway)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

2014

 

 

280

 

 

 

14,791,831

 

 

 

77,752,457

 

 

 

816,097

 

 

 

14,791,831

 

 

 

78,568,554

 

 

 

93,360,385

 

 

 

(22,410,277

)

 

 

70,950,108

 

 

 

 

Junction 47 (fka West Seattle)

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2015

 

 

206

 

 

 

11,726,305

 

 

 

56,576,329

 

 

 

139,678

 

 

 

11,726,305

 

 

 

56,716,007

 

 

 

68,442,312

 

 

 

(9,832,830

)

 

 

58,609,482

 

 

 

 

Kelvin, The (fka Modera)

 

Irvine, CA

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

194

 

 

 

15,521,552

 

 

 

64,853,448

 

 

 

593,826

 

 

 

15,521,552

 

 

 

65,447,274

 

 

 

80,968,826

 

 

 

(12,644,037

)

 

 

68,324,789

 

 

 

 

Kenwood Mews

 

Burbank, CA

 

 

 

 

1991

 

 

141

 

 

 

14,100,000

 

 

 

24,662,883

 

 

 

4,164,875

 

 

 

14,100,000

 

 

 

28,827,758

 

 

 

42,927,758

 

 

 

(14,951,144

)

 

 

27,976,614

 

 

 

 

Laguna Clara

 

Santa Clara, CA

 

 

 

 

1972

 

 

264

 

 

 

13,642,420

 

 

 

29,597,400

 

 

 

5,500,048

 

 

 

13,642,420

 

 

 

35,097,448

 

 

 

48,739,868

 

 

 

(19,856,605

)

 

 

28,883,263

 

 

 

 

Landings at Port Imperial

 

W. New York, NJ

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

276

 

 

 

27,246,045

 

 

 

37,741,050

 

 

 

14,471,631

 

 

 

27,246,045

 

 

 

52,212,681

 

 

 

79,458,726

 

 

 

(33,207,884

)

 

 

46,250,842

 

 

 

 

Lane

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2019

 

 

217

 

 

 

13,142,946

 

 

 

71,853,083

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

13,142,946

 

 

 

71,853,082

 

 

 

84,996,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

84,996,028

 

 

 

 

Lex, The

 

San Jose, CA

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

387

 

 

 

21,817,512

 

 

 

158,778,598

 

 

 

77,511

 

 

 

21,817,512

 

 

 

158,856,109

 

 

 

180,673,621

 

 

 

(8,972,354

)

 

 

171,701,267

 

 

 

 

Liberty Park

 

Braintree, MA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

202

 

 

 

5,977,504

 

 

 

26,749,111

 

 

 

6,951,551

 

 

 

5,977,504

 

 

 

33,700,662

 

 

 

39,678,166

 

 

 

(19,975,624

)

 

 

19,702,542

 

 

 

 

Liberty Tower

 

Arlington, VA

 

G

 

 

2008

 

 

235

 

 

 

16,382,822

 

 

 

83,817,078

 

 

 

2,551,120

 

 

 

16,382,822

 

 

 

86,368,198

 

 

 

102,751,020

 

 

 

(31,785,187

)

 

 

70,965,833

 

 

 

 

Lincoln Heights

 

Quincy, MA

 

 

 

 

1991

 

 

336

 

 

 

5,928,400

 

 

 

33,595,262

 

 

 

15,019,958

 

 

 

5,928,400

 

 

 

48,615,220

 

 

 

54,543,620

 

 

 

(37,746,289

)

 

 

16,797,331

 

 

 

 

Lindley Apartments

 

Encino, CA

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

129

 

 

 

5,805,000

 

 

 

25,705,000

 

 

 

2,055,111

 

 

 

5,805,000

 

 

 

27,760,111

 

 

 

33,565,111

 

 

 

(10,259,804

)

 

 

23,305,307

 

 

 

 

Lofts at Kendall Square (fka Kendall Square)

 

Cambridge, MA

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

186

 

 

 

18,696,674

 

 

 

78,445,657

 

 

 

6,941,386

 

 

 

18,696,674

 

 

 

85,387,043

 

 

 

104,083,717

 

 

 

(24,300,285

)

 

 

79,783,432

 

 

 

 

Lofts at Kendall Square ll (fka 249 Third Street)

 

Cambridge, MA

 

G

 

 

2019

 

 

84

 

 

 

4,603,326

 

 

 

42,655,411

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,603,326

 

 

 

42,655,411

 

 

 

47,258,737

 

 

 

(388,231

)

 

 

46,870,506

 

 

 

 

Longacre House

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2000

 

 

293

 

 

 

73,170,045

 

 

 

53,962,510

 

 

 

4,562,899

 

 

 

73,170,045

 

 

 

58,525,409

 

 

 

131,695,454

 

 

 

(26,269,075

)

 

 

105,426,379

 

 

 

 

Longfellow Place

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

1975

 

 

710

 

 

 

38,264,917

 

 

 

132,175,915

 

 

 

86,857,633

 

 

 

38,264,917

 

 

 

219,033,548

 

 

 

257,298,465

 

 

 

(153,930,179

)

 

 

103,368,286

 

 

 

 

Madox

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

G

 

 

2013

 

 

131

 

 

 

9,679,635

 

 

 

64,594,205

 

 

 

456,215

 

 

 

9,679,635

 

 

 

65,050,420

 

 

 

74,730,055

 

 

 

(4,991,342

)

 

 

69,738,713

 

 

 

 

Mantena

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2012

 

 

98

 

 

 

22,346,513

 

 

 

61,501,158

 

 

 

1,159,451

 

 

 

22,346,513

 

 

 

62,660,609

 

 

 

85,007,122

 

 

 

(18,028,047

)

 

 

66,979,075

 

 

 

 

Marina 41 (fka Marina Del Rey)

 

Marina Del Rey, CA

 

 

 

 

1973

 

 

623

 

 

 

 

 

 

168,842,442

 

 

 

9,214,698

 

 

 

 

 

 

178,057,140

 

 

 

178,057,140

 

 

 

(53,401,243

)

 

 

124,655,897

 

 

 

 

Mariposa at Playa Del Rey (fka Playa Del Rey)

 

Playa Del Rey, CA

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

354

 

 

 

60,900,000

 

 

 

89,311,482

 

 

 

6,259,009

 

 

 

60,900,000

 

 

 

95,570,491

 

 

 

156,470,491

 

 

 

(28,260,197

)

 

 

128,210,294

 

 

 

 

Mark on 8th

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2016

 

 

174

 

 

 

23,004,387

 

 

 

51,148,861

 

 

 

132,254

 

 

 

23,004,387

 

 

 

51,281,115

 

 

 

74,285,502

 

 

 

(4,399,467

)

 

 

69,886,035

 

 

 

 

Market Street Village

 

San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

229

 

 

 

13,740,000

 

 

 

40,757,301

 

 

 

2,433,811

 

 

 

13,740,000

 

 

 

43,191,112

 

 

 

56,931,112

 

 

 

(21,071,334

)

 

 

35,859,778

 

 

 

 

Milano Lofts

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

1925/2006

 

 

99

 

 

 

8,125,216

 

 

 

27,378,784

 

 

 

4,128,987

 

 

 

8,125,216

 

 

 

31,507,771

 

 

 

39,632,987

 

 

 

(9,253,714

)

 

 

30,379,273

 

 

 

 

Mill Creek

 

Milpitas, CA

 

 

 

 

1991

 

 

516

 

 

 

12,858,693

 

 

 

57,168,503

 

 

 

17,604,121

 

 

 

12,858,693

 

 

 

74,772,624

 

 

 

87,631,317

 

 

 

(39,853,420

)

 

 

47,777,897

 

 

 

 

Montierra (CA)

 

San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

272

 

 

 

8,160,000

 

 

 

29,360,938

 

 

 

8,510,123

 

 

 

8,160,000

 

 

 

37,871,061

 

 

 

46,031,061

 

 

 

(26,472,405

)

 

 

19,558,656

 

 

 

 

Description   Initial Cost to Company Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Improvements, net) (E) Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period 12/31/16        
Apartment NameLocation Retail/Commercial Space  Date of Construction Apartment Units (H) Land  Building & Fixtures Building & Fixtures Land Building & Fixtures (A) Total (B)Accumulated Depreciation (C)Investment in Real Estate, Net at 12/31/16 Encumbrances
Hudson PointeJersey City, NJ  2003 182
 5,350,000
 41,114,074
 4,844,133
 5,350,000
 45,958,207
 51,308,207
 (20,241,451) 31,066,756
 
Hunt Club IICharlotte, NC  (F) 
 100,000
 
 
 100,000
 
 100,000
 
 100,000
 
Ivory WoodBothell, WA  2000 144
 2,732,800
 13,888,282
 992,859
 2,732,800
 14,881,141
 17,613,941
 (6,865,471) 10,748,470
 
Jia (fka Chinatown Gateway)Los Angeles, CA G 2014 280
 14,791,831
 76,417,368
 160,373
 14,791,831
 76,577,741
 91,369,572
 (11,450,392) 79,919,180
 
Junction 47 (fka West Seattle)Seattle, WA G 2015 206
 11,726,305
 55,592,607
 10,285
 11,726,305
 55,602,892
 67,329,197
 (2,870,469) 64,458,728
 
Kelvin, The (fka Modera)Irvine, CA  2015 194
 15,521,552
 64,853,448
 140,201
 15,521,552
 64,993,649
 80,515,201
 (5,226,037) 75,289,164
 
Kendall Square IICambridge, MA  (F) 
 
 2,361,587
 
 
 2,361,587
 2,361,587
 
 2,361,587
 
Landings at Port ImperialW. New York, NJ  1999 276
��27,246,045
 37,741,050
 8,727,114
 27,246,045
 46,468,164
 73,714,209
 (27,123,316) 46,590,893
 
Lincoln HeightsQuincy, MA  1991 336
 5,928,400
 33,595,262
 12,900,751
 5,928,400
 46,496,013
 52,424,413
 (32,166,271) 20,258,142
 
Lindley ApartmentsEncino, CA  2004 129
 5,805,000
 25,705,000
 927,140
 5,805,000
 26,632,140
 32,437,140
 (7,515,112) 24,922,028
 
Lofts 590Arlington, VA  2005 212
 20,100,000
 67,909,023
 593,626
 20,100,000
 68,502,649
 88,602,649
 (11,467,543) 77,135,106
 
Lofts at Kendall Square (fka Kendall Square)Cambridge, MA  1998 186
 23,300,000
 78,445,657
 4,430,000
 23,300,000
 82,875,657
 106,175,657
 (14,293,167) 91,882,490
 
Longacre HouseNew York, NY G 2000 293
 73,170,045
 53,962,510
 1,952,072
 73,170,045
 55,914,582
 129,084,627
 (20,862,433) 108,222,194
 
Longfellow PlaceBoston, MA G 1975 710
 47,096,917
 150,143,916
 77,175,848
 47,096,917
 227,319,764
 274,416,681
 (140,185,560) 134,231,121
 
MantenaNew York, NY G 2012 98
 22,346,513
 61,501,158
 726,983
 22,346,513
 62,228,141
 84,574,654
 (11,547,865) 73,026,789
 
Marina 41 (fka Marina Del Rey)Marina Del Rey, CA  1973 623
 
 168,842,442
 5,590,178
 
 174,432,620
 174,432,620
 (34,075,934) 140,356,686
 
Mariposa at Playa Del Rey (fka Playa Del Rey)Playa Del Rey, CA  2004 354
 60,900,000
 89,311,482
 4,874,252
 60,900,000
 94,185,734
 155,085,734
 (17,348,528) 137,737,206
 
Milano LoftsLos Angeles, CA G 1925/2006 99
 8,125,216
 27,378,784
 419,390
 8,125,216
 27,798,174
 35,923,390
 (5,879,972) 30,043,418
 
Mountain View RedevelopmentMountain View, CA  (F) 
 
 11,539
 
 
 11,539
 11,539
 
 11,539
 
Mozaic at Union StationLos Angeles, CA  2007 272
 8,500,000
 52,529,446
 1,742,611
 8,500,000
 54,272,057
 62,772,057
 (20,324,720) 42,447,337
 
Murray Hill Tower (fka Murray Hill)New York, NY G 1974 270
 75,800,000
 102,705,401
 5,632,060
 75,800,000
 108,337,461
 184,137,461
 (21,534,636) 162,602,825
 
NorthglenValencia, CA  1988 234
 9,360,000
 20,778,553
 3,216,250
 9,360,000
 23,994,803
 33,354,803
 (13,232,302) 20,122,501
 
NorthparkBurlingame, CA  1972 510
 38,607,000
 77,472,217
 12,538,178
 38,607,000
 90,010,395
 128,617,395
 (29,143,721) 99,473,674
 
NorthridgePleasant Hill, CA  1974 221
 5,524,000
 14,691,705
 10,511,874
 5,524,000
 25,203,579
 30,727,579
 (17,391,149) 13,336,430
 
Oak Park CombinedAgoura Hills, CA  1989 & 1990 444
 3,390,700
 30,517,274
 9,746,651
 3,390,700
 40,263,925
 43,654,625
 (28,656,591) 14,998,034
 
Oakwood BostonBoston, MA G 1901 94
 22,200,000
 28,672,979
 1,529,010
 22,200,000
 30,201,989
 52,401,989
 (5,884,677) 46,517,312
 
Oakwood Crystal CityArlington, VA  1987 162
 15,400,000
 35,474,336
 2,425,184
 15,400,000
 37,899,520
 53,299,520
 (6,786,525) 46,512,995
 
Oakwood Marina Del ReyMarina Del Rey, CA  1969 597
 
 120,795,359
 2,437,138
 
 123,232,497
 123,232,497
 (24,113,286) 99,119,211
 
OaksSanta Clarita, CA  2000 520
 23,400,000
 61,020,438
 5,042,217
 23,400,000
 66,062,655
 89,462,655
 (31,804,000) 57,658,655
 
Ocean CrestSolana Beach, CA  1986 146
 5,111,200
 11,910,438
 3,961,557
 5,111,200
 15,871,995
 20,983,195
 (9,843,174) 11,140,021
 
Odin (fka Tallman)Seattle, WA  2015 301
 16,807,519
 63,703,105
 4,853
 16,807,519
 63,707,958
 80,515,477
 (3,220,384) 77,295,093
 
Old Town LoftsRedmond, WA G 2014 149
 7,740,467
 44,146,181
 615,810
 7,740,467
 44,761,991
 52,502,458
 (3,368,591) 49,133,867
 
One Henry AdamsSan Francisco, CA G 2016 241
 30,224,393
 132,422,943
 
 30,224,393
 132,422,943
 162,647,336
 
 162,647,336
 
Pacific PlaceLos Angeles, CA  2008 430
 32,250,000
 110,750,000
 1,114,418
 32,250,000
 111,864,418
 144,114,418
 (18,609,682) 125,504,736
 
Packard BuildingSeattle, WA G 2010 61
 5,911,041
 19,954,959
 25,690
 5,911,041
 19,980,649
 25,891,690
 (1,315,590) 24,576,100
 
Parc 77New York, NY G 1903 137
 40,504,000
 18,025,679
 5,639,147
 40,504,000
 23,664,826
 64,168,826
 (11,317,834) 52,850,992
 
Parc CameronNew York, NY G 1927 166
 37,600,000
 9,855,597
 6,917,858
 37,600,000
 16,773,455
 54,373,455
 (9,519,277) 44,854,178
 
Parc ColiseumNew York, NY G 1910 177
 52,654,000
 23,045,751
 8,635,413
 52,654,000
 31,681,164
 84,335,164
 (15,575,683) 68,759,481
 
Parc East TowersNew York, NY G 1977 324
 102,163,000
 108,989,402
 8,841,139
 102,163,000
 117,830,541
 219,993,541
 (44,109,145) 175,884,396
 
Parc on Powell (fka Parkside at Emeryville)Emeryville, CA G 2015 173
 16,667,059
 67,690,072
 48,612
 16,667,059
 67,738,684
 84,405,743
 (4,037,098) 80,368,645
 
Park at Pentagon Row (fka Pentagon City)Arlington, VA G 1990 298
 28,300,000
 78,838,184
 1,353,525
 28,300,000
 80,191,709
 108,491,709
 (14,341,704) 94,150,005
 
Park ConnecticutWashington, D.C.  2000 142
 13,700,000
 59,087,519
 1,138,671
 13,700,000
 60,226,190
 73,926,190
 (10,132,810) 63,793,380
 
Park Hacienda (fka Hacienda)Pleasanton, CA  2000 540
 43,200,000
 128,753,359
 1,303,861
 43,200,000
 130,057,220
 173,257,220
 (24,868,371) 148,388,849
 
Park West (CA)Los Angeles, CA  1987/1990 444
 3,033,500
 27,302,383
 9,833,303
 3,033,500
 37,135,686
 40,169,186
 (26,282,067) 13,887,119
 
ParksideUnion City, CA  1979 208
 6,246,700
 11,827,453
 4,057,554
 6,246,700
 15,885,007
 22,131,707
 (11,039,298) 11,092,409
 
Pearl, TheSeattle, WA G 2008 80
 6,972,585
 26,527,415
 86,236
 6,972,585
 26,613,651
 33,586,236
 (1,802,018) 31,784,218
 
PegasusLos Angeles, CA G 1949/2003 322
 18,094,052
 81,905,948
 4,353,371
 18,094,052
 86,259,319
 104,353,371
 (23,034,817) 81,318,554
 


S-6



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 20162019

Description

 

 

Initial Cost to

Company

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Acquisition

(Improvements,

net) (E)

 

 

Gross Amount Carried at

Close of Period 12/31/19

 

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Retail/

Commercial

Space

 

 

Date of

Construction

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures (A)

 

 

Total (B)

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation (C)

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net at

12/31/19

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Mosaic at Metro

 

Hyattsville, MD

 

 

 

 

2008

 

 

260

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,580,898

 

 

 

1,537,111

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,118,009

 

 

 

61,118,009

 

 

 

(23,624,406

)

 

 

37,493,603

 

 

 

 

Mountain View Redevelopment

 

Mountain View, CA

 

 

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

882,046

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

882,046

 

 

 

882,046

 

 

 

 

 

 

882,046

 

 

 

 

Mozaic at Union Station

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

2007

 

 

272

 

 

 

8,500,000

 

 

 

52,529,446

 

 

 

2,472,824

 

 

 

8,500,000

 

 

 

55,002,270

 

 

 

63,502,270

 

 

 

(26,004,162

)

 

 

37,498,108

 

 

 

 

Murray Hill Tower (fka Murray Hill)

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1974

 

 

270

 

 

 

75,800,000

 

 

 

102,705,401

 

 

 

10,547,453

 

 

 

75,800,000

 

 

 

113,252,854

 

 

 

189,052,854

 

 

 

(34,480,104

)

 

 

154,572,750

 

 

 

 

Next on Sixth

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

2017

 

 

398

 

 

 

52,509,906

 

 

 

136,635,362

 

 

 

52,028

 

 

 

52,509,906

 

 

 

136,687,390

 

 

 

189,197,296

 

 

 

(6,067,150

)

 

 

183,130,146

 

 

 

 

North Pier at Harborside

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

297

 

 

 

4,000,159

 

 

 

94,290,590

 

 

 

5,767,779

 

 

 

4,000,159

 

 

 

100,058,369

 

 

 

104,058,528

 

 

 

(53,298,183

)

 

 

50,760,345

 

 

 

 

Northglen

 

Valencia, CA

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

234

 

 

 

9,360,000

 

 

 

20,778,553

 

 

 

6,828,841

 

 

 

9,360,000

 

 

 

27,607,394

 

 

 

36,967,394

 

 

 

(16,473,980

)

 

 

20,493,414

 

 

 

 

Northpark

 

Burlingame, CA

 

 

 

 

1972

 

 

510

 

 

 

38,607,000

 

 

 

77,472,217

 

 

 

15,236,070

 

 

 

38,607,000

 

 

 

92,708,287

 

 

 

131,315,287

 

 

 

(40,034,278

)

 

 

91,281,009

 

 

 

 

Northridge

 

Pleasant Hill, CA

 

 

 

 

1974

 

 

221

 

 

 

5,524,000

 

 

 

14,691,705

 

 

 

11,618,255

 

 

 

5,524,000

 

 

 

26,309,960

 

 

 

31,833,960

 

 

 

(20,784,027

)

 

 

11,049,933

 

 

 

 

Oak Park Combined

 

Agoura Hills, CA

 

 

 

 

1989 & 1990

 

 

444

 

 

 

3,390,700

 

 

 

30,517,274

 

 

 

11,129,906

 

 

 

3,390,700

 

 

 

41,647,180

 

 

 

45,037,880

 

 

 

(33,598,181

)

 

 

11,439,699

 

 

 

 

Oaks

 

Santa Clarita, CA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

520

 

 

 

23,400,000

 

 

 

61,020,438

 

 

 

7,150,916

 

 

 

23,400,000

 

 

 

68,171,354

 

 

 

91,571,354

 

 

 

(38,896,036

)

 

 

52,675,318

 

 

 

 

Oakwood Crystal City

 

Arlington, VA

 

 

 

 

1987

 

 

162

 

 

 

15,400,000

 

 

 

35,474,336

 

 

 

4,164,931

 

 

 

15,400,000

 

 

 

39,639,267

 

 

 

55,039,267

 

 

 

(11,715,439

)

 

 

43,323,828

 

 

 

 

Ocean Crest

 

Solana Beach, CA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

146

 

 

 

5,111,200

 

 

 

11,910,438

 

 

 

4,831,677

 

 

 

5,111,200

 

 

 

16,742,115

 

 

 

21,853,315

 

 

 

(11,831,439

)

 

 

10,021,876

 

 

 

 

Odin (fka Tallman)

 

Seattle, WA

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

301

 

 

 

16,807,519

 

 

 

64,519,515

 

 

 

70,389

 

 

 

16,807,519

 

 

 

64,589,904

 

 

 

81,397,423

 

 

 

(11,050,157

)

 

 

70,347,266

 

 

 

 

Old Town Lofts

 

Redmond, WA

 

G

 

 

2014

 

 

149

 

 

 

7,740,467

 

 

 

44,146,181

 

 

 

821,523

 

 

 

7,740,467

 

 

 

44,967,704

 

 

 

52,708,171

 

 

 

(8,666,808

)

 

 

44,041,363

 

 

 

 

Olympus Towers

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2000

 

 

328

 

 

 

14,752,034

 

 

 

73,335,425

 

 

 

10,370,617

 

 

 

14,752,034

 

 

 

83,706,042

 

 

 

98,458,076

 

 

 

(46,375,373

)

 

 

52,082,703

 

 

 

 

One Henry Adams

 

San Francisco, CA

 

G

 

 

2016

 

 

241

 

 

 

30,224,393

 

 

 

139,558,692

 

 

 

22,022

 

 

 

30,224,393

 

 

 

139,580,714

 

 

 

169,805,107

 

 

 

(16,605,628

)

 

 

153,199,479

 

 

 

 

One India Street (fka Oakwood Boston)

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

1901

 

 

94

 

 

 

22,200,000

 

 

 

28,672,979

 

 

 

6,249,693

 

 

 

22,200,000

 

 

 

34,922,672

 

 

 

57,122,672

 

 

 

(9,689,007

)

 

 

47,433,665

 

 

 

 

Pacific Place

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

2008

 

 

430

 

 

 

32,250,000

 

 

 

110,750,000

 

 

 

2,028,500

 

 

 

32,250,000

 

 

 

112,778,500

 

 

 

145,028,500

 

 

 

(31,554,841

)

 

 

113,473,659

 

 

 

 

Packard Building

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2010

 

 

61

 

 

 

5,911,041

 

 

 

19,954,959

 

 

 

1,112,353

 

 

 

5,911,041

 

 

 

21,067,312

 

 

 

26,978,353

 

 

 

(3,941,611

)

 

 

23,036,742

 

 

 

 

Parc 77

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1903

 

 

137

 

 

 

40,504,000

 

 

 

18,025,679

 

 

 

6,560,029

 

 

 

40,504,000

 

 

 

24,585,708

 

 

 

65,089,708

 

 

 

(14,088,276

)

 

 

51,001,432

 

 

 

 

Parc Cameron

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1927

 

 

166

 

 

 

37,600,000

 

 

 

9,855,597

 

 

 

7,590,854

 

 

 

37,600,000

 

 

 

17,446,451

 

 

 

55,046,451

 

 

 

(11,702,099

)

 

 

43,344,352

 

 

 

 

Parc Coliseum

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1910

 

 

177

 

 

 

52,654,000

 

 

 

23,045,751

 

 

 

9,553,310

 

 

 

52,654,000

 

 

 

32,599,061

 

 

 

85,253,061

 

 

 

(19,280,179

)

 

 

65,972,882

 

 

 

 

Parc East Towers

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1977

 

 

324

 

 

 

102,163,000

 

 

 

108,989,402

 

 

 

12,219,604

 

 

 

102,163,000

 

 

 

121,209,006

 

 

 

223,372,006

 

 

 

(56,644,803

)

 

 

166,727,203

 

 

 

 

Parc on Powell (fka Parkside at Emeryville)

 

Emeryville, CA

 

G

 

 

2015

 

 

173

 

 

 

16,667,059

 

 

 

65,073,509

 

 

 

419,037

 

 

 

16,667,059

 

 

 

65,492,546

 

 

 

82,159,605

 

 

 

(12,009,148

)

 

 

70,150,457

 

 

 

 

Park Connecticut

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

142

 

 

 

13,700,000

 

 

 

59,087,519

 

 

 

1,863,350

 

 

 

13,700,000

 

 

 

60,950,869

 

 

 

74,650,869

 

 

 

(16,566,168

)

 

 

58,084,701

 

 

 

 

Park Hacienda (fka Hacienda)

 

Pleasanton, CA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

540

 

 

 

43,200,000

 

 

 

128,753,359

 

 

 

6,614,073

 

 

 

43,200,000

 

 

 

135,367,432

 

 

 

178,567,432

 

 

 

(39,974,119

)

 

 

138,593,313

 

 

 

 

Park West (CA)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1987/1990

 

 

444

 

 

 

3,033,500

 

 

 

27,302,383

 

 

 

12,126,113

 

 

 

3,033,500

 

 

 

39,428,496

 

 

 

42,461,996

 

 

 

(30,924,343

)

 

 

11,537,653

 

 

 

 

Parkside

 

Union City, CA

 

 

 

 

1979

 

 

208

 

 

 

6,246,700

 

 

 

11,827,453

 

 

 

8,185,992

 

 

 

6,246,700

 

 

 

20,013,445

 

 

 

26,260,145

 

 

 

(13,217,770

)

 

 

13,042,375

 

 

 

 

Pearl, The (WA)

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2008

 

 

80

 

 

 

6,972,585

 

 

 

26,527,415

 

 

 

1,051,124

 

 

 

6,972,585

 

 

 

27,578,539

 

 

 

34,551,124

 

 

 

(5,151,187

)

 

 

29,399,937

 

 

 

 

Pearl MDR (fka Oakwood Marina Del Rey)

 

Marina Del Rey, CA

 

G

 

 

1969

 

 

597

 

 

 

 

 

 

120,795,359

 

 

 

5,726,479

 

 

 

 

 

 

126,521,838

 

 

 

126,521,838

 

 

 

(38,784,120

)

 

 

87,737,718

 

 

 

 

Pegasus

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

1949/2003

 

 

322

 

 

 

18,094,052

 

 

 

81,905,948

 

 

 

6,904,081

 

 

 

18,094,052

 

 

 

88,810,029

 

 

 

106,904,081

 

 

 

(32,523,925

)

 

 

74,380,156

 

 

 

 

Playa Pacifica

 

Hermosa Beach, CA

 

 

 

 

1972

 

 

285

 

 

 

35,100,000

 

 

 

33,473,822

 

 

 

23,756,377

 

 

 

35,100,000

 

 

 

57,230,199

 

 

 

92,330,199

 

 

 

(31,171,766

)

 

 

61,158,433

 

 

 

 

Portofino

 

Chino Hills, CA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

176

 

 

 

3,572,400

 

 

 

14,660,994

 

 

 

3,874,242

 

 

 

3,572,400

 

 

 

18,535,236

 

 

 

22,107,636

 

 

 

(14,171,043

)

 

 

7,936,593

 

 

 

 

Portofino (Val)

 

Valencia, CA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

216

 

 

 

8,640,000

 

 

 

21,487,126

 

 

 

5,837,031

 

 

 

8,640,000

 

 

 

27,324,157

 

 

 

35,964,157

 

 

 

(17,518,529

)

 

 

18,445,628

 

 

 

 

Portside Towers

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

G

 

 

1992-1997

 

 

527

 

 

 

22,487,006

 

 

 

96,842,913

 

 

 

24,128,821

 

 

 

22,487,006

 

 

 

120,971,734

 

 

 

143,458,740

 

 

 

(89,422,204

)

 

 

54,036,536

 

 

 

 

Potrero 1010

 

San Francisco, CA

 

G

 

 

2016

 

 

453

 

 

 

40,830,011

 

 

 

181,812,933

 

 

 

518,975

 

 

 

40,830,011

 

 

 

182,331,908

 

 

 

223,161,919

 

 

 

(26,294,704

)

 

 

196,867,215

 

 

 

 

Prado (fka Glendale)

 

Glendale, CA

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

264

 

 

 

 

 

 

67,977,313

 

 

 

5,928,659

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,905,972

 

 

 

73,905,972

 

 

 

(21,102,334

)

 

 

52,803,638

 

 

 

 

Prime, The

 

Arlington, VA

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

281

 

 

 

34,625,000

 

 

 

77,879,740

 

 

 

2,669,467

 

 

 

34,625,000

 

 

 

80,549,207

 

 

 

115,174,207

 

 

 

(32,656,903

)

 

 

82,517,304

 

 

 

 

Prism at Park Avenue South (fka 400 Park Avenue South)

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2015

 

 

269

 

 

 

76,292,169

 

 

 

171,649,131

 

 

 

208,922

 

 

 

76,292,169

 

 

 

171,858,053

 

 

 

248,150,222

 

 

 

(32,299,311

)

 

 

215,850,911

 

 

 

 

Promenade at Town Center I & II

 

Valencia, CA

 

 

 

 

2001

 

 

564

 

 

 

28,200,000

 

 

 

69,795,915

 

 

 

10,883,962

 

 

 

28,200,000

 

 

 

80,679,877

 

 

 

108,879,877

 

 

 

(44,391,535

)

 

 

64,488,342

 

 

 

 

Providence

 

Bothell, WA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

200

 

 

 

3,573,621

 

 

 

19,055,505

 

 

 

4,537,035

 

 

 

3,573,621

 

 

 

23,592,540

 

 

 

27,166,161

 

 

 

(12,025,867

)

 

 

15,140,294

 

 

 

 

Quarry Hills

 

Quincy, MA

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

316

 

 

 

26,900,000

 

 

 

84,411,162

 

 

 

4,202,638

 

 

 

26,900,000

 

 

 

88,613,800

 

 

 

115,513,800

 

 

 

(25,515,603

)

 

 

89,998,197

 

 

 

 

Radius Uptown

 

Denver, CO

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

372

 

 

 

13,644,960

 

 

 

121,899,084

 

 

 

640,652

 

 

 

13,644,960

 

 

 

122,539,736

 

 

 

136,184,696

 

 

 

(9,914,578

)

 

 

126,270,118

 

 

 

 

Red 160 (fka Redmond Way)

 

Redmond, WA

 

G

 

 

2011

 

 

250

 

 

 

15,546,376

 

 

 

65,320,010

 

 

 

1,448,098

 

 

 

15,546,376

 

 

 

66,768,108

 

 

 

82,314,484

 

 

 

(20,622,372

)

 

 

61,692,112

 

 

 

 

Redmond Court

 

Bellevue, WA

 

 

 

 

1977

 

 

206

 

 

 

10,300,000

 

 

 

33,488,745

 

 

 

1,211,705

 

 

 

10,300,000

 

 

 

34,700,450

 

 

 

45,000,450

 

 

 

(11,274,160

)

 

 

33,726,290

 

 

 

 

Description   Initial Cost to Company  Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(Improvements, net) (E) Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period 12/31/16        
Apartment NameLocation Retail/Commercial Space  Date of Construction Apartment Units (H) Land  Building & Fixtures Building & Fixtures Land Building & Fixtures (A) Total (B)Accumulated Depreciation (C)Investment in Real Estate, Net at 12/31/16 Encumbrances
Playa PacificaHermosa Beach, CA  1972 285
 35,100,000
 33,473,822
 21,252,912
 35,100,000
 54,726,734
 89,826,734
 (22,557,639) 67,269,095
 
PortofinoChino Hills, CA  1989 176
 3,572,400
 14,660,994
 3,619,935
 3,572,400
 18,280,929
 21,853,329
 (12,064,192) 9,789,137
 
Portofino (Val)Valencia, CA  1989 216
 8,640,000
 21,487,126
 4,531,435
 8,640,000
 26,018,561
 34,658,561
 (14,294,138) 20,364,423
 
Portside TowersJersey City, NJ G 1992-1997 527
 22,487,006
 96,842,913
 20,261,246
 22,487,006
 117,104,159
 139,591,165
 (75,662,868) 63,928,297
 
Potrero 1010San Francisco, CA G 2016 453
 40,830,011
 178,838,375
 2,685
 40,830,011
 178,841,060
 219,671,071
 (4,297,727) 215,373,344
 
Prado (fka Glendale)Glendale, CA  1988 264
 
 67,977,313
 2,474,023
 
 70,451,336
 70,451,336
 (12,649,164) 57,802,172
 
Prime, TheArlington, VA  2002 256
 32,000,000
 64,436,539
 1,366,624
 32,000,000
 65,803,163
 97,803,163
 (25,533,405) 72,269,758
 
Prism at Park Avenue South (fka 400 Park Avenue South)New York, NY G 2015 269
 76,292,169
 171,532,416
 40,159
 76,292,169
 171,572,575
 247,864,744
 (12,053,844) 235,810,900
 
Promenade at Town Center I & IIValencia, CA  2001 564
 28,200,000
 69,795,915
 6,603,855
 28,200,000
 76,399,770
 104,599,770
 (35,742,052) 68,857,718
 
Quarry HillsQuincy, MA  2006 316
 26,900,000
 84,411,162
 1,276,264
 26,900,000
 85,687,426
 112,587,426
 (15,916,309) 96,671,117
 
Red 160 (fka Redmond Way)Redmond, WA G 2011 250
 15,546,376
 65,320,010
 1,069,525
 15,546,376
 66,389,535
 81,935,911
 (13,743,779) 68,192,132
 
Redmond CourtBellevue, WA  1977 206
 10,300,000
 33,488,745
 828,734
 10,300,000
 34,317,479
 44,617,479
 (6,900,171) 37,717,308
 
Regency PalmsHuntington Beach, CA  1969 310
 1,857,400
 16,713,254
 5,843,205
 1,857,400
 22,556,459
 24,413,859
 (16,685,572) 7,728,287
 
Renaissance VillasBerkeley, CA G 1998 34
 2,458,000
 4,542,000
 157,541
 2,458,000
 4,699,541
 7,157,541
 (1,716,722) 5,440,819
 
Reserve at Mountain View (fka Mountain View)Mountain View, CA  1965 180
 27,000,000
 33,029,605
 3,985,141
 27,000,000
 37,014,746
 64,014,746
 (7,098,473) 56,916,273
 
Reserve at Potomac YardAlexandria, VA  2002 588
 11,918,917
 68,862,641
 10,012,055
 11,918,917
 78,874,696
 90,793,613
 (34,843,070) 55,950,543
 
Reserve at Town Center I-III (WA)Mill Creek, WA G 2001, 2009, 2014 584
 16,769,205
 77,511,523
 2,904,720
 16,769,205
 80,416,243
 97,185,448
 (27,282,993) 69,902,455
 
Residences at Westgate I (fka Westgate II)Pasadena, CA G 2014 252
 17,859,785
 108,596,287
 152,142
 17,859,785
 108,748,429
 126,608,214
 (11,706,631) 114,901,583
 
Residences at Westgate II (fka Westgate III)Pasadena, CA G 2015 88
 12,118,248
 40,458,283
 28,122
 12,118,248
 40,486,405
 52,604,653
 (2,670,021) 49,934,632
 
Rianna ISeattle, WA G 2000 78
 2,268,160
 14,864,482
 570,971
 2,268,160
 15,435,453
 17,703,613
 (4,912,805) 12,790,808
 
Ridgewood Village I&IISan Diego, CA  1997 408
 11,809,500
 34,004,048
 5,443,381
 11,809,500
 39,447,429
 51,256,929
 (23,108,949) 28,147,980
 
Riva Terra I (fka Redwood Shores)Redwood City, CA  1986 304
 34,963,355
 84,587,658
 1,530,506
 34,963,355
 86,118,164
 121,081,519
 (16,714,984) 104,366,535
 
Riva Terra II (fka Harborside)Redwood City, CA  1986 149
 17,136,645
 40,536,531
 1,833,334
 17,136,645
 42,369,865
 59,506,510
 (7,532,830) 51,973,680
 
RiverparkRedmond, WA G 2009 319
 14,355,000
 80,894,049
 1,100,173
 14,355,000
 81,994,222
 96,349,222
 (18,616,561) 77,732,661
 
Rolling Green (Milford)Milford, MA  1970 304
 2,012,350
 13,452,150
 7,325,804
 2,012,350
 20,777,954
 22,790,304
 (12,541,523) 10,248,781
 
Rosecliff IIQuincy, MA  2005 130
 4,922,840
 30,202,160
 873,630
 4,922,840
 31,075,790
 35,998,630
 (7,963,684) 28,034,946
 
Sakura CrossingLos Angeles, CA G 2009 230
 14,641,990
 42,858,010
 703,088
 14,641,990
 43,561,098
 58,203,088
 (11,836,842) 46,366,246
 
Seventh & JamesSeattle, WA  1992 96
 663,800
 5,974,803
 3,798,267
 663,800
 9,773,070
 10,436,870
 (7,029,871) 3,406,999
 
Sheffield CourtArlington, VA  1986 597
 3,342,381
 31,337,332
 14,316,432
 3,342,381
 45,653,764
 48,996,145
 (33,910,069) 15,086,076
 
SkycrestValencia, CA  1999 264
 10,560,000
 25,574,457
 3,079,215
 10,560,000
 28,653,672
 39,213,672
 (16,045,953) 23,167,719
 
SkylarkUnion City, CA  1986 174
 1,781,600
 16,731,916
 4,194,009
 1,781,600
 20,925,925
 22,707,525
 (12,497,731) 10,209,794
 
Skyline TerraceBurlingame, CA  1967 & 1987 138
 16,836,000
 35,414,000
 4,638,329
 16,836,000
 40,052,329
 56,888,329
 (11,663,739) 45,224,590
 
Skyline TowersFalls Church, VA G 1971 939
 78,278,200
 91,485,591
 39,225,721
 78,278,200
 130,711,312
 208,989,512
 (66,807,948) 142,181,564
 
SoMa IISan Francisco, CA  (F) 
 29,406,606
 3,589,891
 
 29,406,606
 3,589,891
 32,996,497
 
 32,996,497
 
Sonterra at Foothill RanchFoothill Ranch, CA  1997 300
 7,503,400
 24,048,507
 4,962,421
 7,503,400
 29,010,928
 36,514,328
 (17,403,278) 19,111,050
 
South City Station (fka South San Francisco)San Francisco, CA G 2007 360
 68,900,000
 79,476,861
 2,331,779
 68,900,000
 81,808,640
 150,708,640
 (15,596,819) 135,111,821
 
SouthwoodPalo Alto, CA  1985 100
 6,936,600
 14,324,069
 3,202,676
 6,936,600
 17,526,745
 24,463,345
 (11,356,629) 13,106,716
 
Springbrook EstatesRiverside, CA  (F) 
 18,200,000
 
 
 18,200,000
 
 18,200,000
 
 18,200,000
 
Summerset Village IIChatsworth, CA  (F) 
 260,646
 
 
 260,646
 
 260,646
 
 260,646
 
Summit at Sausalito (fka Sausalito)Sausalito, CA  1978 198
 26,000,000
 28,435,024
 3,586,242
 26,000,000
 32,021,266
 58,021,266
 (7,628,434) 50,392,832
 
Ten23 (fka 500 West 23rd Street)New York, NY G 2011 111
 
 58,881,873
 165,340
 
 59,047,213
 59,047,213
 (10,287,817) 48,759,396
 
Terraces, TheSan Francisco, CA G 1975 117
 14,087,610
 16,314,151
 982,446
 14,087,610
 17,296,597
 31,384,207
 (5,171,269) 26,212,938
 
Third SquareCambridge, MA G 2008/2009 471
 26,767,171
 218,822,728
 5,396,605
 26,767,171
 224,219,333
 250,986,504
 (62,174,271) 188,812,233
 
Three20Seattle, WA G 2013 134
 7,030,766
 29,005,762
 703,110
 7,030,766
 29,708,872
 36,739,638
 (4,264,421) 32,475,217
 
Town Center South Commercial TractSt. Charles, MD  (F) 
 1,500,000
 9,394
 
 1,500,000
 9,394
 1,509,394
 
 1,509,394
 


S-7



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 20162019

Description

 

 

Initial Cost to

Company

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Acquisition

(Improvements,

net) (E)

 

 

Gross Amount Carried at

Close of Period 12/31/19

 

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Retail/

Commercial

Space

 

 

Date of

Construction

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures (A)

 

 

Total (B)

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation (C)

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net at

12/31/19

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Regency Palms

 

Huntington Beach, CA

 

 

 

 

1969

 

 

310

 

 

 

1,857,400

 

 

 

16,713,254

 

 

 

7,272,427

 

 

 

1,857,400

 

 

 

23,985,681

 

 

 

25,843,081

 

 

 

(19,161,878

)

 

 

6,681,203

 

 

 

 

Reserve at Clarendon Centre, The

 

Arlington, VA

 

G

 

 

2003

 

 

252

 

 

 

10,500,000

 

 

 

52,812,935

 

 

 

4,855,911

 

 

 

10,500,000

 

 

 

57,668,846

 

 

 

68,168,846

 

 

 

(32,743,477

)

 

 

35,425,369

 

 

 

 

Reserve at Eisenhower, The

 

Alexandria, VA

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

226

 

 

 

6,500,000

 

 

 

34,585,060

 

 

 

4,852,458

 

 

 

6,500,000

 

 

 

39,437,518

 

 

 

45,937,518

 

 

 

(22,240,250

)

 

 

23,697,268

 

 

 

 

Reserve at Empire Lakes

 

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

467

 

 

 

16,345,000

 

 

 

73,080,670

 

 

 

3,893,736

 

 

 

16,345,000

 

 

 

76,974,406

 

 

 

93,319,406

 

 

 

(39,080,433

)

 

 

54,238,973

 

 

 

 

Reserve at Fairfax Corner

 

Fairfax, VA

 

 

 

 

2001

 

 

652

 

 

 

15,804,057

 

 

 

63,129,051

 

 

 

12,239,068

 

 

 

15,804,057

 

 

 

75,368,119

 

 

 

91,172,176

 

 

 

(44,632,394

)

 

 

46,539,782

 

 

 

 

Reserve at Mountain View (fka Mountain View)

 

Mountain View, CA

 

 

 

 

1965

 

 

180

 

 

 

27,000,000

 

 

 

33,029,605

 

 

 

7,608,914

 

 

 

27,000,000

 

 

 

40,638,519

 

 

 

67,638,519

 

 

 

(12,863,114

)

 

 

54,775,405

 

 

 

 

Reserve at Potomac Yard

 

Alexandria, VA

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

588

 

 

 

11,918,917

 

 

 

68,862,641

 

 

 

17,256,235

 

 

 

11,918,917

 

 

 

86,118,876

 

 

 

98,037,793

 

 

 

(45,846,659

)

 

 

52,191,134

 

 

 

 

Reserve at Town Center I-III (WA)

 

Mill Creek, WA

 

G

 

 

2001, 2009, 2014

 

 

584

 

 

 

16,768,705

 

 

 

77,623,664

 

 

 

8,538,253

 

 

 

16,768,705

 

 

 

86,161,917

 

 

 

102,930,622

 

 

 

(36,697,179

)

 

 

66,233,443

 

 

 

 

Residences at Westgate I (fka Westgate II)

 

Pasadena, CA

 

G

 

 

2014

 

 

252

 

 

 

17,859,785

 

 

 

109,259,858

 

 

 

477,844

 

 

 

17,859,785

 

 

 

109,737,702

 

 

 

127,597,487

 

 

 

(27,267,435

)

 

 

100,330,052

 

 

 

 

Residences at Westgate II (fka Westgate III)

 

Pasadena, CA

 

G

 

 

2015

 

 

88

 

 

 

12,118,248

 

 

 

40,486,467

 

 

 

97,831

 

 

 

12,118,248

 

 

 

40,584,298

 

 

 

52,702,546

 

 

 

(7,453,042

)

 

 

45,249,504

 

 

 

 

Rianna I & II

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2000/2002

 

 

156

 

 

 

4,430,000

 

 

 

29,298,096

 

 

 

1,408,357

 

 

 

4,430,000

 

 

 

30,706,453

 

 

 

35,136,453

 

 

 

(12,521,975

)

 

 

22,614,478

 

 

 

 

Ridgewood Village I&II

 

San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

408

 

 

 

11,809,500

 

 

 

34,004,048

 

 

 

6,152,653

 

 

 

11,809,500

 

 

 

40,156,701

 

 

 

51,966,201

 

 

 

(27,801,818

)

 

 

24,164,383

 

 

 

 

Riva Terra I (fka Redwood Shores)

 

Redwood City, CA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

304

 

 

 

34,963,355

 

 

 

84,587,658

 

 

 

6,552,889

 

 

 

34,963,355

 

 

 

91,140,547

 

 

 

126,103,902

 

 

 

(27,578,186

)

 

 

98,525,716

 

 

 

 

Riva Terra II (fka Harborside)

 

Redwood City, CA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

149

 

 

 

17,136,645

 

 

 

40,536,531

 

 

 

3,532,047

 

 

 

17,136,645

 

 

 

44,068,578

 

 

 

61,205,223

 

 

 

(12,214,368

)

 

 

48,990,855

 

 

 

 

Riverpark

 

Redmond, WA

 

G

 

 

2009

 

 

321

 

 

 

14,355,000

 

 

 

80,894,049

 

 

 

4,145,694

 

 

 

14,355,000

 

 

 

85,039,743

 

 

 

99,394,743

 

 

 

(27,531,587

)

 

 

71,863,156

 

 

 

 

Rivington, The

 

Hoboken, NJ

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

240

 

 

 

34,340,640

 

 

 

112,522,073

 

 

 

2,385,966

 

 

 

34,340,640

 

 

 

114,908,039

 

 

 

149,248,679

 

 

 

(11,203,805

)

 

 

138,044,874

 

 

 

 

Rosecliff II

 

Quincy, MA

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

130

 

 

 

4,922,840

 

 

 

30,202,160

 

 

 

1,575,032

 

 

 

4,922,840

 

 

 

31,777,192

 

 

 

36,700,032

 

 

 

(11,139,316

)

 

 

25,560,716

 

 

 

 

Sakura Crossing

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

2009

 

 

230

 

 

 

14,641,990

 

 

 

42,858,010

 

 

 

1,508,474

 

 

 

14,641,990

 

 

 

44,366,484

 

 

 

59,008,474

 

 

 

(16,104,349

)

 

 

42,904,125

 

 

 

 

Saxton

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2019

 

 

325

 

 

 

38,805,400

 

 

 

128,661,766

 

 

 

1,221

 

 

 

38,805,400

 

 

 

128,662,987

 

 

 

167,468,387

 

 

 

(1,106,731

)

 

 

166,361,656

 

 

 

 

Seventh & James

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

1992

 

 

96

 

 

 

663,800

 

 

 

5,974,803

 

 

 

4,559,907

 

 

 

663,800

 

 

 

10,534,710

 

 

 

11,198,510

 

 

 

(8,193,189

)

 

 

3,005,321

 

 

 

 

Sheffield Court

 

Arlington, VA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

597

 

 

 

3,342,381

 

 

 

31,337,332

 

 

 

16,837,180

 

 

 

3,342,381

 

 

 

48,174,512

 

 

 

51,516,893

 

 

 

(39,604,857

)

 

 

11,912,036

 

 

 

 

Siena Terrace

 

Lake Forest, CA

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

356

 

 

 

8,900,000

 

 

 

24,083,024

 

 

 

7,673,467

 

 

 

8,900,000

 

 

 

31,756,491

 

 

 

40,656,491

 

 

 

(22,703,857

)

 

 

17,952,634

 

 

 

 

Skycrest

 

Valencia, CA

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

264

 

 

 

10,560,000

 

 

 

25,574,457

 

 

 

6,439,296

 

 

 

10,560,000

 

 

 

32,013,753

 

 

 

42,573,753

 

 

 

(19,701,076

)

 

 

22,872,677

 

 

 

 

Skyhouse Denver

 

Denver, CO

 

G

 

 

2017

 

 

354

 

 

 

13,562,331

 

 

 

126,360,318

 

 

 

260,188

 

 

 

13,562,331

 

 

 

126,620,506

 

 

 

140,182,837

 

 

 

(10,544,133

)

 

 

129,638,704

 

 

 

 

Skylark

 

Union City, CA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

174

 

 

 

1,781,600

 

 

 

16,731,916

 

 

 

5,693,705

 

 

 

1,781,600

 

 

 

22,425,621

 

 

 

24,207,221

 

 

 

(15,390,513

)

 

 

8,816,708

 

 

 

 

Skyline Terrace

 

Burlingame, CA

 

 

 

 

1967 & 1987

 

 

138

 

 

 

16,836,000

 

 

 

35,414,000

 

 

 

8,685,848

 

 

 

16,836,000

 

 

 

44,099,848

 

 

 

60,935,848

 

 

 

(16,883,846

)

 

 

44,052,002

 

 

 

 

Skyview

 

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

260

 

 

 

3,380,000

 

 

 

21,952,863

 

 

 

5,952,747

 

 

 

3,380,000

 

 

 

27,905,610

 

 

 

31,285,610

 

 

 

(18,956,521

)

 

 

12,329,089

 

 

 

 

SoMa II

 

San Francisco, CA

 

 

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

29,406,606

 

 

 

5,863,582

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,406,606

 

 

 

5,863,582

 

 

 

35,270,188

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,270,188

 

 

 

 

Sonterra at Foothill Ranch

 

Foothill Ranch, CA

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

300

 

 

 

7,503,400

 

 

 

24,048,507

 

 

 

6,103,825

 

 

 

7,503,400

 

 

 

30,152,332

 

 

 

37,655,732

 

 

 

(21,265,834

)

 

 

16,389,898

 

 

 

 

South City Station (fka South San Francisco)

 

San Francisco, CA

 

G

 

 

2007

 

 

368

 

 

 

68,900,000

 

 

 

79,476,861

 

 

 

5,496,725

 

 

 

68,900,000

 

 

 

84,973,586

 

 

 

153,873,586

 

 

 

(24,542,210

)

 

 

129,331,376

 

 

 

 

Southwood

 

Palo Alto, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

100

 

 

 

6,936,600

 

 

 

14,324,069

 

 

 

6,974,332

 

 

 

6,936,600

 

 

 

21,298,401

 

 

 

28,235,001

 

 

 

(13,871,734

)

 

 

14,363,267

 

 

 

 

Springbrook Estates

 

Riverside, CA

 

 

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

18,200,000

 

 

 

1,145,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,200,000

 

 

 

1,145,000

 

 

 

19,345,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,345,000

 

 

 

 

Springline

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2016

 

 

136

 

 

 

9,163,667

 

 

 

47,910,981

 

 

 

413,447

 

 

 

9,163,667

 

 

 

48,324,428

 

 

 

57,488,095

 

 

 

(6,348,664

)

 

 

51,139,431

 

 

 

 

STOA

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

2017

 

 

237

 

 

 

25,326,048

 

 

 

79,976,031

 

 

 

355,097

 

 

 

25,326,048

 

 

 

80,331,128

 

 

 

105,657,176

 

 

 

(4,420,377

)

 

 

101,236,799

 

 

 

 

Summerset Village

 

Chatsworth, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

280

 

 

 

2,890,450

 

 

 

23,670,889

 

 

 

8,502,754

 

 

 

2,890,450

 

 

 

32,173,643

 

 

 

35,064,093

 

 

 

(25,071,401

)

 

 

9,992,692

 

 

 

 

Summit at Sausalito (fka Sausalito)

 

Sausalito, CA

 

 

 

 

1978

 

 

198

 

 

 

26,000,000

 

 

 

28,435,024

 

 

 

9,826,451

 

 

 

26,000,000

 

 

 

38,261,475

 

 

 

64,261,475

 

 

 

(13,610,363

)

 

 

50,651,112

 

 

 

 

Ten23 (fka 500 West 23rd Street)

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2011

 

 

111

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,881,873

 

 

 

839,289

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,721,162

 

 

 

59,721,162

 

 

 

(16,244,073

)

 

 

43,477,089

 

 

 

 

Terraces, The

 

San Francisco, CA

 

G

 

 

1975

 

 

117

 

 

 

14,087,610

 

 

 

16,314,151

 

 

 

2,303,726

 

 

 

14,087,610

 

 

 

18,617,877

 

 

 

32,705,487

 

 

 

(7,132,658

)

 

 

25,572,829

 

 

 

 

Third Square

 

Cambridge, MA

 

G

 

 

2008/2009

 

 

471

 

 

 

26,767,171

 

 

 

218,822,728

 

 

 

8,710,964

 

 

 

26,767,171

 

 

 

227,533,692

 

 

 

254,300,863

 

 

 

(86,467,715

)

 

 

167,833,148

 

 

 

 

Three20

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2013

 

 

134

 

 

 

7,030,766

 

 

 

29,005,762

 

 

 

783,255

 

 

 

7,030,766

 

 

 

29,789,017

 

 

 

36,819,783

 

 

 

(8,010,054

)

 

 

28,809,729

 

 

 

 

Toscana

 

Irvine, CA

 

 

 

 

1991/1993

 

 

563

 

 

 

39,410,000

 

 

 

50,806,072

 

 

 

23,541,748

 

 

 

39,410,000

 

 

 

74,347,820

 

 

 

113,757,820

 

 

 

(44,385,604

)

 

 

69,372,216

 

 

 

 

Town Square at Mark Center I (fka Millbrook I)

 

Alexandria, VA

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

406

 

 

 

24,360,000

 

 

 

86,178,714

 

 

 

9,536,594

 

 

 

24,360,000

 

 

 

95,715,308

 

 

 

120,075,308

 

 

 

(47,769,571

)

 

 

72,305,737

 

 

 

 

Town Square at Mark Center II

 

Alexandria, VA

 

 

 

 

2001

 

 

272

 

 

 

15,568,464

 

 

 

55,029,607

 

 

 

4,431,783

 

 

 

15,568,464

 

 

 

59,461,390

 

 

 

75,029,854

 

 

 

(23,267,306

)

 

 

51,762,548

 

 

 

 

Troy Boston

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

2015

 

 

378

 

 

 

34,641,051

 

 

 

181,607,331

 

 

 

657,969

 

 

 

34,641,051

 

 

 

182,265,300

 

 

 

216,906,351

 

 

 

(16,175,931

)

 

 

200,730,420

 

 

 

 

Urbana (fka Market Street Landing)

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2014

 

 

289

 

 

 

12,542,418

 

 

 

75,800,090

 

 

 

2,128,448

 

 

 

12,542,418

 

 

 

77,928,538

 

 

 

90,470,956

 

 

 

(20,704,557

)

 

 

69,766,399

 

 

 

 

Description   Initial Cost to Company  Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(Improvements, net) (E) Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period 12/31/16        
Apartment NameLocation Retail/Commercial Space  Date of Construction Apartment Units (H) Land  Building & Fixtures Building & Fixtures Land Building & Fixtures (A) Total (B)Accumulated Depreciation (C)Investment in Real Estate, Net at 12/31/16 Encumbrances
Town Square at Mark Center IIAlexandria, VA  2001 272
 15,568,464
 55,029,607
 2,117,754
 15,568,464
 57,147,361
 72,715,825
 (17,050,654) 55,665,171
 
Urbana (fka Market Street Landing)Seattle, WA G 2014 287
 12,542,418
 75,766,505
 283,439
 12,542,418
 76,049,944
 88,592,362
 (10,215,162) 78,377,200
 
Uwajimaya VillageSeattle, WA  2002 176
 8,800,000
 22,188,288
 724,720
 8,800,000
 22,913,008
 31,713,008
 (10,116,792) 21,596,216
 
Vantage PointeSan Diego, CA G 2009 679
 9,403,960
 190,596,040
 8,156,057
 9,403,960
 198,752,097
 208,156,057
 (52,465,809) 155,690,248
 
VeloceRedmond, WA G 2009 322
 15,322,724
 76,176,594
 750,251
 15,322,724
 76,926,845
 92,249,569
 (14,412,958) 77,836,611
 
Verde Condominium Homes (fka Mission Verde, LLC)San Jose, CA  1986 108
 5,190,700
 9,679,109
 4,206,652
 5,190,700
 13,885,761
 19,076,461
 (9,342,080) 9,734,381
 
Veridian (fka Silver Spring)Silver Spring, MD G 2009 457
 18,539,817
 130,407,365
 1,921,459
 18,539,817
 132,328,824
 150,868,641
 (34,495,297) 116,373,344
 
Villa SolanaLaguna Hills, CA  1984 272
 1,665,100
 14,985,678
 9,397,116
 1,665,100
 24,382,794
 26,047,894
 (18,569,428) 7,478,466
 
Village at Del Mar Heights, The (fka Del Mar Heights)San Diego, CA  1986 168
 15,100,000
 40,859,396
 814,553
 15,100,000
 41,673,949
 56,773,949
 (7,931,652) 48,842,297
 
Virginia SquareArlington, VA G 2002 231
 
 85,940,003
 2,598,732
 
 88,538,735
 88,538,735
 (15,463,270) 73,075,465
 
Vista 99 (fka Tasman)San Jose, CA  2016 554
 27,709,329
 175,174,600
 15,853
 27,709,329
 175,190,453
 202,899,782
 (5,630,074) 197,269,708
 
Vista Del LagoMission Viejo, CA  1986-1988 608
 4,525,800
 40,736,293
 16,333,057
 4,525,800
 57,069,350
 61,595,150
 (43,829,076) 17,766,074
 
Vista on CourthouseArlington, VA  2008 220
 15,550,260
 69,449,740
 1,412,841
 15,550,260
 70,862,581
 86,412,841
 (21,083,205) 65,329,636
 
Walden ParkCambridge, MA  1966 232
 12,448,888
 52,044,448
 4,033,426
 12,448,888
 56,077,874
 68,526,762
 (15,551,486) 52,975,276
 
Water Park TowersArlington, VA  1989 362
 34,400,000
 108,485,859
 6,380,938
 34,400,000
 114,866,797
 149,266,797
 (20,648,479) 128,618,318
 
Watertown SquareWatertown, MA G 2005 134
 16,800,000
 34,074,056
 1,145,350
 16,800,000
 35,219,406
 52,019,406
 (6,303,140) 45,716,266
 
West 96thNew York, NY G 1987 207
 84,800,000
 67,055,502
 4,128,963
 84,800,000
 71,184,465
 155,984,465
 (15,247,357) 140,737,108
 
West End Apartments (fka Emerson Place/CRP II)Boston, MA G 2008 310
 469,546
 163,123,022
 2,430,837
 469,546
 165,553,859
 166,023,405
 (50,041,771) 115,981,634
 
Westchester at RockvilleRockville, MD  2009 192
 10,600,000
 44,135,207
 467,221
 10,600,000
 44,602,428
 55,202,428
 (8,102,186) 47,100,242
 
WestmontNew York, NY G 1986 163
 64,900,000
 61,143,259
 2,222,721
 64,900,000
 63,365,980
 128,265,980
 (12,146,404) 116,119,576
 
WestsideLos Angeles, CA  2004 204
 34,200,000
 56,962,630
 2,395,974
 34,200,000
 59,358,604
 93,558,604
 (10,435,607) 83,122,997
 
Westside Barrington (fka Westside Villas III)Los Angeles, CA  1999 36
 3,060,000
 5,538,871
 839,038
 3,060,000
 6,377,909
 9,437,909
 (3,354,957) 6,082,952
 
Westside Barry (Westside Villas VI)Los Angeles, CA  1989 18
 1,530,000
 3,023,523
 547,484
 1,530,000
 3,571,007
 5,101,007
 (1,914,301) 3,186,706
 
Westside Beloit (fka Westside Villas I)Los Angeles, CA  1999 21
 1,785,000
 3,233,254
 589,475
 1,785,000
 3,822,729
 5,607,729
 (2,090,807) 3,516,922
 
Westside Bundy (fka Westside Villas II)Los Angeles, CA  1999 23
 1,955,000
 3,541,435
 542,370
 1,955,000
 4,083,805
 6,038,805
 (2,154,240) 3,884,565
 
Westside Butler (fka Westside Villas IV)Los Angeles, CA  1999 36
 3,060,000
 5,539,390
 838,212
 3,060,000
 6,377,602
 9,437,602
 (3,356,464) 6,081,138
 
Westside Villas (fka Westside Villas V &VII)Los Angeles, CA  1999 & 2001 113
 9,605,000
 19,983,385
 2,301,916
 9,605,000
 22,285,301
 31,890,301
 (11,417,791) 20,472,510
 
Windridge (CA)Laguna Niguel, CA  1989 344
 2,662,900
 23,985,497
 9,609,243
 2,662,900
 33,594,740
 36,257,640
 (24,492,262) 11,765,378
 
Wood Creek IPleasant Hill, CA  1987 256
 9,729,900
 23,009,768
 6,948,103
 9,729,900
 29,957,871
 39,687,771
 (20,466,696) 19,221,075
 
Management BusinessChicago, IL  (D) 
 
 
 110,281,527
 
 110,281,527
 110,281,527
 (86,786,203) 23,495,324
 
Operating PartnershipChicago, IL  (F) 
 
 25,724
 
 
 25,724
 25,724
 
 25,724
 
OtherN/A   
 
 
 51,888
 
 51,888
 51,888
 (3,279) 48,609
 
Wholly Owned Unencumbered  
 
 52,102
 4,477,036,244
 13,029,648,911
 941,634,623
 4,477,036,244
 13,971,283,534
 18,448,319,778
 (3,651,990,171) 14,796,329,607
 

  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Wholly Owned Encumbered:  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
101 West EndNew York, NY G 2000 506
 190,600,000
 131,374,708
 3,789,525
 190,600,000
 135,164,233
 325,764,233
 (29,116,644) 296,647,589
 105,541,770
1401 Joyce on Pentagon RowArlington, VA  2004 326
 9,780,000
 89,668,165
 4,067,409
 9,780,000
 93,735,574
 103,515,574
 (28,321,732) 75,193,842
 57,324,952
2501 PorterWashington, D.C.  1988 202
 13,000,000
 75,271,179
 2,836,196
 13,000,000
 78,107,375
 91,107,375
 (13,691,308) 77,416,067
  (K)
300 East 39th (fka East 39th)New York, NY G 2001 254
 48,900,000
 96,174,639
 2,284,116
 48,900,000
 98,458,755
 147,358,755
 (18,157,350) 129,201,405
 59,763,098
303 East 83rd (fka Camargue)New York, NY G 1976 261
 79,400,000
 79,122,624
 2,200,064
 79,400,000
 81,322,688
 160,722,688
 (16,079,870) 144,642,818
  (K)
425 BroadwaySanta Monica, CA G 2001 101
 12,600,000
 34,394,772
 2,855,350
 12,600,000
 37,250,122
 49,850,122
 (6,449,425) 43,400,697
  (K)
4701 WillardChevy Chase, MD G 1966 517
 76,921,130
 153,947,682
 29,256,068
 76,921,130
 183,203,750
 260,124,880
 (41,887,641) 218,237,239
 92,377,799
55 West Fifth I & II (fka Townhouse Plaza and Gardens)San Mateo, CA  1964/1972 241
 21,041,710
 71,931,323
 11,437,590
 21,041,710
 83,368,913
 104,410,623
 (17,523,868) 86,886,755
 27,229,091
800 Sixth Ave (fka Chelsea)New York, NY G 2003 266
 59,900,000
 155,861,605
 1,300,274
 59,900,000
 157,161,879
 217,061,879
 (27,296,410) 189,765,469
 76,708,911
929 Mass (fka 929 House)Cambridge, MA G 1975 127
 3,252,993
 21,745,595
 6,246,692
 3,252,993
 27,992,287
 31,245,280
 (16,141,485) 15,103,795
 1,007,468
Academy VillageNorth Hollywood, CA  1989 248
 25,000,000
 23,593,194
 8,049,828
 25,000,000
 31,643,022
 56,643,022
 (16,858,183) 39,784,839
 19,946,425
AcappellaPasadena, CA  2002 143
 5,839,548
 29,360,452
 1,816,839
 5,839,548
 31,177,291
 37,016,839
 (8,938,860) 28,077,979
 19,213,624




S-8




EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 20162019

Description

 

 

Initial Cost to

Company

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Acquisition

(Improvements,

net) (E)

 

 

Gross Amount Carried at

Close of Period 12/31/19

 

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Retail/

Commercial

Space

 

 

Date of

Construction

 

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures (A)

 

 

Total (B)

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation (C)

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net at

12/31/19

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Uwajimaya Village

 

Seattle, WA

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

 

176

 

 

 

8,800,000

 

 

 

22,188,288

 

 

 

4,603,487

 

 

 

8,800,000

 

 

 

26,791,775

 

 

 

35,591,775

 

 

 

(12,717,581

)

 

 

22,874,194

 

 

 

 

Vantage Pointe

 

San Diego, CA

 

G

 

 

2009

 

 

 

679

 

 

 

9,403,960

 

 

 

190,596,040

 

 

 

10,700,900

 

 

 

9,403,960

 

 

 

201,296,940

 

 

 

210,700,900

 

 

 

(73,412,146

)

 

 

137,288,754

 

 

 

 

Veloce

 

Redmond, WA

 

G

 

 

2009

 

 

 

322

 

 

 

15,322,724

 

 

 

76,176,594

 

 

 

1,876,091

 

 

 

15,322,724

 

 

 

78,052,685

 

 

 

93,375,409

 

 

 

(23,071,740

)

 

 

70,303,669

 

 

 

 

Venue at the Promenade

 

Castle Rock, CO

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

312

 

 

 

8,355,048

 

 

 

83,752,689

 

 

 

89,298

 

 

 

8,355,048

 

 

 

83,841,987

 

 

 

92,197,035

 

 

 

(4,260,814

)

 

 

87,936,221

 

 

 

 

Verde Condominium Homes (fka Mission Verde, LLC)

 

San Jose, CA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

5,190,700

 

 

 

9,679,109

 

 

 

4,541,057

 

 

 

5,190,700

 

 

 

14,220,166

 

 

 

19,410,866

 

 

 

(10,817,710

)

 

 

8,593,156

 

 

 

 

Veridian (fka Silver Spring)

 

Silver Spring, MD

 

G

 

 

2009

 

 

 

457

 

 

 

18,539,817

 

 

 

130,407,365

 

 

 

3,911,967

 

 

 

18,539,817

 

 

 

134,319,332

 

 

 

152,859,149

 

 

 

(48,528,051

)

 

 

104,331,098

 

 

 

 

Versailles

 

Woodland Hills, CA

 

 

 

 

1991

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

12,650,000

 

 

 

33,656,292

 

 

 

8,301,520

 

 

 

12,650,000

 

 

 

41,957,812

 

 

 

54,607,812

 

 

 

(24,444,631

)

 

 

30,163,181

 

 

 

 

Versailles (K-Town)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

2008

 

 

 

225

 

 

 

10,590,975

 

 

 

44,409,025

 

 

 

1,768,461

 

 

 

10,590,975

 

 

 

46,177,486

 

 

 

56,768,461

 

 

 

(18,704,272

)

 

 

38,064,189

 

 

 

 

Victor on Venice

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

2006

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

10,350,000

 

 

 

35,433,437

 

 

 

1,455,531

 

 

 

10,350,000

 

 

 

36,888,968

 

 

 

47,238,968

 

 

 

(17,138,982

)

 

 

30,099,986

 

 

 

 

Villa Solana

 

Laguna Hills, CA

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

 

272

 

 

 

1,665,100

 

 

 

14,985,677

 

 

 

11,916,441

 

 

 

1,665,100

 

 

 

26,902,118

 

 

 

28,567,218

 

 

 

(21,819,381

)

 

 

6,747,837

 

 

 

 

Village at Del Mar Heights, The (fka Del Mar Heights)

 

San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

15,100,000

 

 

 

40,859,396

 

 

 

3,059,227

 

 

 

15,100,000

 

 

 

43,918,623

 

 

 

59,018,623

 

 

 

(13,135,144

)

 

 

45,883,479

 

 

 

 

Virginia Square

 

Arlington, VA

 

G

 

 

2002

 

 

 

231

 

 

 

 

 

 

85,940,003

 

 

 

6,071,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

92,011,128

 

 

 

92,011,128

 

 

 

(25,981,773

)

 

 

66,029,355

 

 

 

 

Vista 99 (fka Tasman)

 

San Jose, CA

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

554

 

 

 

27,709,329

 

 

 

177,551,020

 

 

 

530,009

 

 

 

27,709,329

 

 

 

178,081,029

 

 

 

205,790,358

 

 

 

(26,777,048

)

 

 

179,013,310

 

 

 

 

Vista Del Lago

 

Mission Viejo, CA

 

 

 

 

1986-1988

 

 

 

608

 

 

 

4,525,800

 

 

 

40,736,293

 

 

 

18,471,821

 

 

 

4,525,800

 

 

 

59,208,114

 

 

 

63,733,914

 

 

 

(50,585,532

)

 

 

13,148,382

 

 

 

 

Walden Park

 

Cambridge, MA

 

 

 

 

1966

 

 

 

232

 

 

 

12,448,888

 

 

 

52,044,448

 

 

 

4,534,927

 

 

 

12,448,888

 

 

 

56,579,375

 

 

 

69,028,263

 

 

 

(21,419,276

)

 

 

47,608,987

 

 

 

 

Water Park Towers

 

Arlington, VA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

362

 

 

 

34,400,000

 

 

 

108,485,859

 

 

 

10,352,960

 

 

 

34,400,000

 

 

 

118,838,819

 

 

 

153,238,819

 

 

 

(34,973,941

)

 

 

118,264,878

 

 

 

 

Watertown Square

 

Watertown, MA

 

G

 

 

2005

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

16,800,000

 

 

 

34,074,056

 

 

 

1,780,526

 

 

 

16,800,000

 

 

 

35,854,582

 

 

 

52,654,582

 

 

 

(10,288,446

)

 

 

42,366,136

 

 

 

 

West 96th

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1987

 

 

 

207

 

 

 

84,800,000

 

 

 

67,055,501

 

 

 

6,032,361

 

 

 

84,800,000

 

 

 

73,087,862

 

 

 

157,887,862

 

 

 

(23,339,208

)

 

 

134,548,654

 

 

 

 

West End Apartments (fka Emerson Place/CRP II)

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

2008

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

469,546

 

 

 

163,123,022

 

 

 

4,644,170

 

 

 

469,546

 

 

 

167,767,192

 

 

 

168,236,738

 

 

 

(67,233,339

)

 

 

101,003,399

 

 

 

 

Westchester at Rockville

 

Rockville, MD

 

 

 

 

2009

 

 

 

192

 

 

 

10,600,000

 

 

 

44,135,207

 

 

 

1,115,325

 

 

 

10,600,000

 

 

 

45,250,532

 

 

 

55,850,532

 

 

 

(12,723,620

)

 

 

43,126,912

 

 

 

 

Westmont

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1986

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

64,900,000

 

 

 

61,143,259

 

 

 

5,556,773

 

 

 

64,900,000

 

 

 

66,700,032

 

 

 

131,600,032

 

 

 

(19,263,749

)

 

 

112,336,283

 

 

 

 

Westside

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

204

 

 

 

34,200,000

 

 

 

56,962,630

 

 

 

3,224,934

 

 

 

34,200,000

 

 

 

60,187,564

 

 

 

94,387,564

 

 

 

(17,012,037

)

 

 

77,375,527

 

 

 

 

Westside Barrington (fka Westside Villas III)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

3,060,000

 

 

 

5,538,871

 

 

 

1,138,171

 

 

 

3,060,000

 

 

 

6,677,042

 

 

 

9,737,042

 

 

 

(4,172,543

)

 

 

5,564,499

 

 

 

 

Westside Barry (Westside Villas VI)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

1,530,000

 

 

 

3,023,523

 

 

 

731,986

 

 

 

1,530,000

 

 

 

3,755,509

 

 

 

5,285,509

 

 

 

(2,345,294

)

 

 

2,940,215

 

 

 

 

Westside Beloit (fka Westside Villas I)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

1,785,000

 

 

 

3,233,254

 

 

 

748,943

 

 

 

1,785,000

 

 

 

3,982,197

 

 

 

5,767,197

 

 

 

(2,551,527

)

 

 

3,215,670

 

 

 

 

Westside Bundy (fka Westside Villas II)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

1,955,000

 

 

 

3,541,435

 

 

 

760,287

 

 

 

1,955,000

 

 

 

4,301,722

 

 

 

6,256,722

 

 

 

(2,680,002

)

 

 

3,576,720

 

 

 

 

Westside Butler (fka Westside Villas IV)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1999

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

3,060,000

 

 

 

5,539,390

 

 

 

1,169,833

 

 

 

3,060,000

 

 

 

6,709,223

 

 

 

9,769,223

 

 

 

(4,174,963

)

 

 

5,594,260

 

 

 

 

Westside Villas (fka Westside Villas V &VII)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1999 & 2001

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

9,605,000

 

 

 

19,983,385

 

 

 

2,834,458

 

 

 

9,605,000

 

 

 

22,817,843

 

 

 

32,422,843

 

 

 

(14,084,170

)

 

 

18,338,673

 

 

 

 

Windridge (CA)

 

Laguna Niguel, CA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

344

 

 

 

2,662,900

 

 

 

23,985,497

 

 

 

12,894,049

 

 

 

2,662,900

 

 

 

36,879,546

 

 

 

39,542,446

 

 

 

(29,263,863

)

 

 

10,278,583

 

 

 

 

Wood Creek I

 

Pleasant Hill, CA

 

 

 

 

1987

 

 

 

256

 

 

 

9,729,900

 

 

 

23,009,768

 

 

 

10,186,943

 

 

 

9,729,900

 

 

 

33,196,711

 

 

 

42,926,611

 

 

 

(24,464,128

)

 

 

18,462,483

 

 

 

 

Woodleaf

 

Campbell, CA

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

 

178

 

 

 

8,550,600

 

 

 

16,988,183

 

 

 

5,276,931

 

 

 

8,550,600

 

 

 

22,265,114

 

 

 

30,815,714

 

 

 

(16,233,694

)

 

 

14,582,020

 

 

 

 

Management Business

 

Chicago, IL

 

 

 

 

(D)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

120,063,148

 

 

 

 

 

 

120,063,148

 

 

 

120,063,148

 

 

 

(100,043,672

)

 

 

20,019,476

 

 

 

 

Operating Partnership

 

Chicago, IL

 

 

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,342,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,342,110

 

 

 

3,342,110

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,342,110

 

 

 

 

Other

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,015

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,015

 

 

 

99,015

 

 

 

(46,097

)

 

 

52,918

 

 

 

 

Wholly Owned Unencumbered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68,002

 

 

 

5,112,513,000

 

 

 

16,729,302,793

 

 

 

1,566,452,557

 

 

 

5,112,513,000

 

 

 

18,295,755,350

 

 

 

23,408,268,350

 

 

 

(6,199,955,243

)

 

 

17,208,313,107

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholly Owned Encumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2501 Porter

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

13,000,000

 

 

 

75,271,179

 

 

 

6,881,392

 

 

 

13,000,000

 

 

 

82,152,571

 

 

 

95,152,571

 

 

 

(23,752,603

)

 

 

71,399,968

 

 

(H)

 

300 East 39th (fka East 39th)

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2001

 

 

 

254

 

 

 

48,900,000

 

 

 

96,174,639

 

 

 

5,454,780

 

 

 

48,900,000

 

 

 

101,629,419

 

 

 

150,529,419

 

 

 

(29,129,896

)

 

 

121,399,523

 

 

 

61,827,655

 

303 East 83rd (fka Camargue)

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

1976

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

79,400,000

 

 

 

79,122,624

 

 

 

9,514,116

 

 

 

79,400,000

 

 

 

88,636,740

 

 

 

168,036,740

 

 

 

(25,938,650

)

 

 

142,098,090

 

 

(H)

 

425 Broadway

 

Santa Monica, CA

 

G

 

 

2001

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

12,600,000

 

 

 

34,394,772

 

 

 

3,743,997

 

 

 

12,600,000

 

 

 

38,138,769

 

 

 

50,738,769

 

 

 

(11,169,257

)

 

 

39,569,512

 

 

(H)

 

55 West Fifth I & II (fka Townhouse Plaza and Gardens)

 

San Mateo, CA

 

 

 

 

1964/1972

 

 

 

241

 

 

 

21,041,710

 

 

 

71,931,323

 

 

 

13,813,466

 

 

 

21,041,710

 

 

 

85,744,789

 

 

 

106,786,499

 

 

 

(29,022,401

)

 

 

77,764,098

 

 

 

24,527,815

 

Alcyone

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2004

 

 

 

162

 

 

 

11,379,497

 

 

 

49,360,503

 

 

 

1,521,001

 

 

 

11,379,497

 

 

 

50,881,504

 

 

 

62,261,001

 

 

 

(11,900,832

)

 

 

50,360,169

 

 

 

27,246,175

 

Avanti

 

Anaheim, CA

 

 

 

 

1987

 

 

 

162

 

 

 

12,960,000

 

 

 

18,497,683

 

 

 

4,104,266

 

 

 

12,960,000

 

 

 

22,601,949

 

 

 

35,561,949

 

 

 

(11,252,625

)

 

 

24,309,324

 

 

 

28,015,078

 

Avenir Apartments

 

Boston, MA

 

G

 

 

2009

 

 

 

241

 

 

 

 

 

 

114,321,619

 

 

 

5,726,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

120,047,969

 

 

 

120,047,969

 

 

 

(32,447,760

)

 

 

87,600,209

 

 

 

85,443,736

 

Calvert Woodley

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

1962

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

12,600,000

 

 

 

43,527,379

 

 

 

2,412,100

 

 

 

12,600,000

 

 

 

45,939,479

 

 

 

58,539,479

 

 

 

(13,266,223

)

 

 

45,273,256

 

 

(H)

 

Description   Initial Cost to Company  Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(Improvements, net) (E) Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period 12/31/16        
Apartment NameLocation Retail/Commercial Space  Date of Construction Apartment Units (H) Land  Building & Fixtures Building & Fixtures Land Building & Fixtures (A) Total (B)Accumulated Depreciation (C)Investment in Real Estate, Net at 12/31/16 Encumbrances
AlboradaFremont, CA  1999 442
 24,310,000
 59,214,129
 7,336,822
 24,310,000
 66,550,951
 90,860,951
 (36,408,710) 54,452,241
  (I)
AlcyoneSeattle, WA G 2004 161
 11,379,497
 49,360,503
 560,007
 11,379,497
 49,920,510
 61,300,007
 (5,595,873) 55,704,134
 28,675,325
Arches, TheSunnyvale, CA  1974 410
 26,650,000
 62,850,000
 1,319,564
 26,650,000
 64,169,564
 90,819,564
 (18,676,294) 72,143,270
  (J)
Artisan SquareNorthridge, CA  2002 140
 7,000,000
 20,537,359
 1,314,168
 7,000,000
 21,851,527
 28,851,527
 (10,748,443) 18,103,084
 22,749,081
AvantiAnaheim, CA  1987 162
 12,960,000
 18,497,682
 2,706,778
 12,960,000
 21,204,460
 34,164,460
 (8,619,700) 25,544,760
 25,005,850
Avenir ApartmentsBoston, MA G 2009 241
 
 114,321,618
 1,416,319
 
 115,737,937
 115,737,937
 (20,055,604) 95,682,333
 90,544,765
Bella Vista I, II, III CombinedWoodland Hills, CA  2003-2007 579
 31,682,754
 121,095,786
 4,165,480
 31,682,754
 125,261,266
 156,944,020
 (49,400,072) 107,543,948
 57,848,455
BerkeleyanBerkeley, CA G 1998 56
 4,377,000
 16,022,110
 360,831
 4,377,000
 16,382,941
 20,759,941
 (6,147,451) 14,612,490
 8,188,077
Calvert WoodleyWashington, D.C.  1962 136
 12,600,000
 43,527,379
 1,869,918
 12,600,000
 45,397,297
 57,997,297
 (8,314,350) 49,682,947
  (K)
Carmel TerraceSan Diego, CA  1988-1989 384
 2,288,300
 20,596,281
 11,662,759
 2,288,300
 32,259,040
 34,547,340
 (25,490,481) 9,056,859
  (J)
Chelsea SquareRedmond, WA  1991 113
 3,397,100
 9,289,074
 2,167,212
 3,397,100
 11,456,286
 14,853,386
 (7,244,601) 7,608,785
 9,205,288
Citrus SuitesSanta Monica, CA  1978 70
 9,000,000
 16,950,326
 1,623,844
 9,000,000
 18,574,170
 27,574,170
 (3,264,484) 24,309,686
  (K)
Cleveland HouseWashington, D.C.  1953 214
 18,300,000
 66,392,414
 3,359,210
 18,300,000
 69,751,624
 88,051,624
 (12,463,465) 75,588,159
  (K)
Columbia CrossingArlington, VA  1991 247
 23,500,000
 53,045,073
 2,467,048
 23,500,000
 55,512,121
 79,012,121
 (10,603,755) 68,408,366
  (K)
Deerwood (SD)San Diego, CA  1990 316
 2,082,095
 18,739,815
 14,552,126
 2,082,095
 33,291,941
 35,374,036
 (26,781,646) 8,592,390
  (J)
Del Mar RidgeSan Diego, CA  1998 181
 7,801,824
 36,948,176
 3,554,417
 7,801,824
 40,502,593
 48,304,417
 (13,227,515) 35,076,902
 39,472,029
Estancia at Santa Clara (fka Santa Clara)Santa Clara, CA  2000 450
 
 123,759,804
 907,589
 
 124,667,393
 124,667,393
 (22,844,872) 101,822,521
  (K)
FairchaseFairfax, VA  2007 392
 23,500,000
 87,722,321
 791,751
 23,500,000
 88,514,072
 112,014,072
 (15,478,802) 96,535,270
  (K)
FairfieldStamford, CT G 1996 263
 6,510,200
 39,690,120
 7,374,368
 6,510,200
 47,064,488
 53,574,688
 (30,942,121) 22,632,567
 31,281,223
Fine Arts BuildingBerkeley, CA G 2004 100
 7,817,000
 26,462,772
 335,849
 7,817,000
 26,798,621
 34,615,621
 (9,960,485) 24,655,136
 16,055,441
Flats at DuPont CircleWashington, D.C.  1967 306
 35,200,000
 108,768,198
 891,807
 35,200,000
 109,660,005
 144,860,005
 (18,523,867) 126,336,138
  (K)
Gaia BuildingBerkeley, CA G 2000 91
 7,113,000
 25,623,826
 253,313
 7,113,000
 25,877,139
 32,990,139
 (9,605,521) 23,384,618
 14,492,793
Gaithersburg StationGaithersburg, MD G 2013 389
 17,500,000
 74,678,917
 580,456
 17,500,000
 75,259,373
 92,759,373
 (12,410,304) 80,349,069
 96,542,458
GloLos Angeles, CA G 2008 201
 16,047,022
 48,650,963
 1,928,600
 16,047,022
 50,579,563
 66,626,585
 (12,285,651) 54,340,934
 31,863,038
HathawayLong Beach, CA  1987 385
 2,512,500
 22,611,912
 8,822,118
 2,512,500
 31,434,030
 33,946,530
 (23,107,759) 10,838,771
 46,464,853
Heights on Capitol HillSeattle, WA G 2006 104
 5,425,000
 21,138,028
 561,221
 5,425,000
 21,699,249
 27,124,249
 (8,325,174) 18,799,075
 25,879,145
Kelvin Court (fka Alta Pacific)Irvine, CA  2008 132
 10,752,145
 34,628,115
 487,960
 10,752,145
 35,116,075
 45,868,220
 (10,739,451) 35,128,769
 26,218,004
Kenwood MewsBurbank, CA  1991 141
 14,100,000
 24,662,883
 3,432,035
 14,100,000
 28,094,918
 42,194,918
 (11,624,548) 30,570,370
  (J)
La Terrazza at Colma StationColma, CA G 2005 153
 
 41,251,044
 759,840
 
 42,010,884
 42,010,884
 (15,478,760) 26,532,124
 24,976,920
Laguna ClaraSanta Clara, CA  1972 264
 13,642,420
 29,707,475
 4,774,728
 13,642,420
 34,482,203
 48,124,623
 (17,151,836) 30,972,787
  (J)
Liberty ParkBraintree, MA  2000 202
 5,977,504
 26,749,111
 5,895,100
 5,977,504
 32,644,211
 38,621,715
 (15,657,977) 22,963,738
 24,947,516
Liberty TowerArlington, VA G 2008 235
 16,382,822
 83,817,078
 1,647,551
 16,382,822
 85,464,629
 101,847,451
 (23,410,128) 78,437,323
 44,696,782
Longview PlaceWaltham, MA  2004 348
 20,880,000
 90,255,509
 4,693,142
 20,880,000
 94,948,651
 115,828,651
 (38,397,081) 77,431,570
 70,777,791
Market Street VillageSan Diego, CA  2006 229
 13,740,000
 40,757,301
 1,957,762
 13,740,000
 42,715,063
 56,455,063
 (16,545,350) 39,909,713
  (J)
Metro on FirstSeattle, WA G 2002 102
 8,540,000
 12,209,981
 1,040,629
 8,540,000
 13,250,610
 21,790,610
 (5,406,375) 16,384,235
 22,622,379
Mill CreekMilpitas, CA  1991 516
 12,858,693
 57,168,503
 9,258,516
 12,858,693
 66,427,019
 79,285,712
 (30,949,901) 48,335,811
 69,242,252
ModaSeattle, WA G 2009 251
 12,649,228
 36,842,012
 875,933
 12,649,228
 37,717,945
 50,367,173
 (11,291,703) 39,075,470
  (L)
Montierra (CA)San Diego, CA  1990 272
 8,160,000
 29,360,938
 7,732,818
 8,160,000
 37,093,756
 45,253,756
 (22,969,702) 22,284,054
  (J)
Mosaic at MetroHyattsville, MD  2008 260
 
 59,580,898
 813,248
 
 60,394,146
 60,394,146
 (17,426,612) 42,967,534
 42,327,373
North Pier at HarborsideJersey City, NJ  2003 297
 4,000,159
 94,290,590
 3,486,749
 4,000,159
 97,777,339
 101,777,498
 (42,656,500) 59,120,998
  (I)
Olympus TowersSeattle, WA G 2000 328
 14,752,034
 73,335,425
 8,245,007
 14,752,034
 81,580,432
 96,332,466
 (36,690,596) 59,641,870
 49,754,197
Park Place at San Mateo (fka San Mateo)San Mateo, CA G 2001 575
 71,900,000
 211,907,141
 9,695,764
 71,900,000
 221,602,905
 293,502,905
 (39,044,321) 254,458,584
  (K)
ProvidenceBothell, WA  2000 200
 3,573,621
 19,055,505
 1,328,617
 3,573,621
 20,384,122
 23,957,743
 (9,481,448) 14,476,295
  (I)
Reserve at Clarendon Centre, TheArlington, VA G 2003 252
 10,500,000
 52,812,935
 4,133,203
 10,500,000
 56,946,138
 67,446,138
 (26,559,665) 40,886,473
  (J)
Reserve at Eisenhower, TheAlexandria, VA  2002 226
 6,500,000
 34,585,060
 2,771,158
 6,500,000
 37,356,218
 43,856,218
 (17,817,428) 26,038,790
  (J)
Reserve at Empire LakesRancho Cucamonga, CA  2005 467
 16,345,000
 73,080,670
 2,674,707
 16,345,000
 75,755,377
 92,100,377
 (31,075,305) 61,025,072
  (I)
Reserve at Fairfax CornerFairfax, VA  2001 652
 15,804,057
 63,129,051
 10,544,380
 15,804,057
 73,673,431
 89,477,488
 (35,713,995) 53,763,493
 84,636,440
Rianna IISeattle, WA G 2002 78
 2,161,840
 14,433,614
 335,207
 2,161,840
 14,768,821
 16,930,661
 (4,665,753) 12,264,908
 9,179,918
Siena TerraceLake Forest, CA  1988 356
 8,900,000
 24,083,024
 6,960,564
 8,900,000
 31,043,588
 39,943,588
 (18,827,023) 21,116,565
 64,374,172
SkyviewRancho Santa Margarita, CA  1999 260
 3,380,000
 21,952,863
 5,142,411
 3,380,000
 27,095,274
 30,475,274
 (15,457,341) 15,017,933
 47,170,890

S-9




EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 20162019

Description

 

 

Initial Cost to

Company

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Acquisition

(Improvements,

net) (E)

 

 

Gross Amount Carried at

Close of Period 12/31/19

 

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Retail/

Commercial

Space

 

 

Date of

Construction

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures (A)

 

 

Total (B)

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation (C)

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net at

12/31/19

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Chelsea Square

 

Redmond, WA

 

 

 

 

1991

 

 

113

 

 

 

3,397,100

 

 

 

9,289,074

 

 

 

2,960,815

 

 

 

3,397,100

 

 

 

12,249,889

 

 

 

15,646,989

 

 

 

(8,780,971

)

 

 

6,866,018

 

 

 

9,248,429

 

Citrus Suites

 

Santa Monica, CA

 

 

 

 

1978

 

 

70

 

 

 

9,000,000

 

 

 

16,950,326

 

 

 

2,141,605

 

 

 

9,000,000

 

 

 

19,091,931

 

 

 

28,091,931

 

 

 

(5,582,509

)

 

 

22,509,422

 

 

(H)

 

Cleveland House

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

1953

 

 

214

 

 

 

18,300,000

 

 

 

66,392,414

 

 

 

5,509,932

 

 

 

18,300,000

 

 

 

71,902,346

 

 

 

90,202,346

 

 

 

(20,430,345

)

 

 

69,772,001

 

 

(H)

 

Columbia Crossing

 

Arlington, VA

 

 

 

 

1991

 

 

247

 

 

 

23,500,000

 

 

 

53,045,073

 

 

 

3,113,933

 

 

 

23,500,000

 

 

 

56,159,006

 

 

 

79,659,006

 

 

 

(16,792,580

)

 

 

62,866,426

 

 

(H)

 

Elevé

 

Glendale, CA

 

G

 

 

2013

 

 

208

 

 

 

14,080,560

 

 

 

56,419,440

 

 

 

1,010,321

 

 

 

14,080,560

 

 

 

57,429,761

 

 

 

71,510,321

 

 

 

(14,460,258

)

 

 

57,050,063

 

 

 

38,356,888

 

Estancia at Santa Clara (fka Santa Clara)

 

Santa Clara, CA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

450

 

 

 

 

 

 

123,759,804

 

 

 

1,914,108

 

 

 

 

 

 

125,673,912

 

 

 

125,673,912

 

 

 

(36,538,855

)

 

 

89,135,057

 

 

(H)

 

Fairchase

 

Fairfax, VA

 

 

 

 

2007

 

 

392

 

 

 

23,500,000

 

 

 

87,722,321

 

 

 

1,576,897

 

 

 

23,500,000

 

 

 

89,299,218

 

 

 

112,799,218

 

 

 

(24,613,974

)

 

 

88,185,244

 

 

(H)

 

Fairfield

 

Stamford, CT

 

G

 

 

1996

 

 

263

 

 

 

6,510,200

 

 

 

39,690,120

 

 

 

9,165,718

 

 

 

6,510,200

 

 

 

48,855,838

 

 

 

55,366,038

 

 

 

(36,158,521

)

 

 

19,207,517

 

 

 

31,381,614

 

Flats at DuPont Circle

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

1967

 

 

306

 

 

 

35,200,000

 

 

 

108,768,198

 

 

 

4,181,605

 

 

 

35,200,000

 

 

 

112,949,803

 

 

 

148,149,803

 

 

 

(29,876,521

)

 

 

118,273,282

 

 

(H)

 

Glo

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

G

 

 

2008

 

 

201

 

 

 

16,047,023

 

 

 

48,650,963

 

 

 

3,529,222

 

 

 

16,047,023

 

 

 

52,180,185

 

 

 

68,227,208

 

 

 

(17,906,742

)

 

 

50,320,466

 

 

 

32,367,606

 

Heights on Capitol Hill

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2006

 

 

104

 

 

 

5,425,000

 

 

 

21,138,028

 

 

 

1,887,584

 

 

 

5,425,000

 

 

 

23,025,612

 

 

 

28,450,612

 

 

 

(10,762,358

)

 

 

17,688,254

 

 

 

22,562,286

 

Kelvin Court (fka Alta Pacific)

 

Irvine, CA

 

 

 

 

2008

 

 

132

 

 

 

10,752,145

 

 

 

34,628,115

 

 

 

851,673

 

 

 

10,752,145

 

 

 

35,479,788

 

 

 

46,231,933

 

 

 

(14,415,041

)

 

 

31,816,892

 

 

 

26,242,091

 

La Terrazza at Colma Station

 

Colma, CA

 

G

 

 

2005

 

 

155

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,251,044

 

 

 

3,207,542

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,458,586

 

 

 

44,458,586

 

 

 

(19,788,954

)

 

 

24,669,632

 

 

 

25,008,472

 

Lofts 590

 

Arlington, VA

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

212

 

 

 

20,100,000

 

 

 

67,909,023

 

 

 

785,733

 

 

 

20,100,000

 

 

 

68,694,756

 

 

 

88,794,756

 

 

 

(18,393,776

)

 

 

70,400,980

 

 

 

42,942,461

 

Longview Place

 

Waltham, MA

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

348

 

 

 

20,880,000

 

 

 

90,255,509

 

 

 

10,395,783

 

 

 

20,880,000

 

 

 

100,651,292

 

 

 

121,531,292

 

 

 

(49,137,968

)

 

 

72,393,324

 

 

 

84,192,433

 

Metro on First

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2002

 

 

102

 

 

 

8,540,000

 

 

 

12,209,981

 

 

 

2,455,932

 

 

 

8,540,000

 

 

 

14,665,913

 

 

 

23,205,913

 

 

 

(7,193,891

)

 

 

16,012,022

 

 

 

21,468,471

 

Moda

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

2009

 

 

251

 

 

 

12,649,228

 

 

 

36,842,012

 

 

 

1,903,142

 

 

 

12,649,228

 

 

 

38,745,154

 

 

 

51,394,382

 

 

 

(14,892,031

)

 

 

36,502,351

 

 

(I)

 

Park Place at San Mateo (fka San Mateo)

 

San Mateo, CA

 

G

 

 

2001

 

 

575

 

 

 

71,900,000

 

 

 

211,907,141

 

 

 

13,628,927

 

 

 

71,900,000

 

 

 

225,536,068

 

 

 

297,436,068

 

 

 

(64,679,195

)

 

 

232,756,873

 

 

(H)

 

SoMa Square Apartments (fka South Market)

 

San Francisco, CA

 

G

 

 

1986

 

 

410

 

 

 

79,900,000

 

 

 

177,316,977

 

 

 

15,704,742

 

 

 

79,900,000

 

 

 

193,021,719

 

 

 

272,921,719

 

 

 

(52,889,334

)

 

 

220,032,385

 

 

(H)

 

Square One

 

Seattle, WA

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

112

 

 

 

7,222,544

 

 

 

26,277,456

 

 

 

99,319

 

 

 

7,222,544

 

 

 

26,376,775

 

 

 

33,599,319

 

 

 

(6,486,674

)

 

 

27,112,645

 

 

(I)

 

Teresina

 

Chula Vista, CA

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

440

 

 

 

28,600,000

 

 

 

61,916,670

 

 

 

7,609,660

 

 

 

28,600,000

 

 

 

69,526,330

 

 

 

98,126,330

 

 

 

(34,235,450

)

 

 

63,890,880

 

 

 

37,940,000

 

Vantage Hollywood

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1987

 

 

298

 

 

 

42,580,326

 

 

 

56,014,674

 

 

 

2,850,265

 

 

 

42,580,326

 

 

 

58,864,939

 

 

 

101,445,265

 

 

 

(13,149,796

)

 

 

88,295,469

 

 

 

39,550,471

 

Vintage

 

Ontario, CA

 

 

 

 

2005-2007

 

 

300

 

 

 

7,059,230

 

 

 

47,677,762

 

 

 

1,742,159

 

 

 

7,059,230

 

 

 

49,419,921

 

 

 

56,479,151

 

 

 

(23,528,467

)

 

 

32,950,684

 

 

 

49,085,671

 

Vintage at 425 Broadway (fka Promenade)

 

Santa Monica, CA

 

G

 

 

1934/2001

 

 

60

 

 

 

9,000,000

 

 

 

13,961,523

 

 

 

1,918,439

 

 

 

9,000,000

 

 

 

15,879,962

 

 

 

24,879,962

 

 

 

(4,816,090

)

 

 

20,063,872

 

 

(H)

 

West 54th

 

New York, NY

 

G

 

 

2001

 

 

222

 

 

 

60,900,000

 

 

 

48,193,837

 

 

 

4,230,586

 

 

 

60,900,000

 

 

 

52,424,423

 

 

 

113,324,423

 

 

 

(16,852,716

)

 

 

96,471,707

 

 

 

48,684,032

 

Westgate (fka Westgate I)

 

Pasadena, CA

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

480

 

 

 

22,898,848

 

 

 

133,467,158

 

 

 

3,178,513

 

 

 

22,898,848

 

 

 

136,645,671

 

 

 

159,544,519

 

 

 

(42,104,815

)

 

 

117,439,704

 

 

 

96,409,896

 

Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

798,230,171

 

Wholly Owned Encumbered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,425

 

 

 

769,823,411

 

 

 

2,274,256,364

 

 

 

160,725,623

 

 

 

769,823,411

 

 

 

2,434,981,987

 

 

 

3,204,805,398

 

 

 

(792,348,079

)

 

 

2,412,457,319

 

 

 

1,630,731,451

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partially Owned Unencumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2300 Elliott

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

1992

 

 

92

 

 

 

796,800

 

 

 

7,173,725

 

 

 

7,612,428

 

 

 

796,800

 

 

 

14,786,153

 

 

 

15,582,953

 

 

 

(11,840,195

)

 

 

3,742,758

 

 

 

 

9th & W

 

Washington, DC

 

G

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,566,064

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,566,064

 

 

 

3,566,064

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,566,064

 

 

 

 

Canyon Ridge

 

San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

162

 

 

 

4,869,448

 

 

 

11,955,064

 

 

 

4,156,380

 

 

 

4,869,448

 

 

 

16,111,444

 

 

 

20,980,892

 

 

 

(11,815,991

)

 

 

9,164,901

 

 

 

 

Country Oaks

 

Agoura Hills, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

256

 

 

 

6,105,000

 

 

 

29,561,865

 

 

 

7,265,339

 

 

 

6,105,000

 

 

 

36,827,204

 

 

 

42,932,204

 

 

 

(22,480,257

)

 

 

20,451,947

 

 

 

 

Harrison Square (fka Elliot Bay)

 

Seattle, WA

 

G

 

 

1992

 

 

166

 

 

 

7,600,000

 

 

 

35,844,345

 

 

 

5,653,924

 

 

 

7,600,000

 

 

 

41,498,269

 

 

 

49,098,269

 

 

 

(12,916,108

)

 

 

36,182,161

 

 

 

 

Radius Koreatown

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

2014/2016

 

 

301

 

 

 

32,494,154

 

 

 

84,645,202

 

 

 

276,918

 

 

 

32,494,154

 

 

 

84,922,120

 

 

 

117,416,274

 

 

 

(11,662,625

)

 

 

105,753,649

 

 

 

 

Rosecliff

 

Quincy, MA

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

156

 

 

 

5,460,000

 

 

 

15,721,570

 

 

 

4,373,677

 

 

 

5,460,000

 

 

 

20,095,247

 

 

 

25,555,247

 

 

 

(13,904,866

)

 

 

11,650,381

 

 

 

 

Strayhorse at Arrowhead Ranch

 

Glendale, AZ

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

136

 

 

 

4,400,000

 

 

 

12,968,001

 

 

 

1,162,489

 

 

 

4,400,000

 

 

 

14,130,490

 

 

 

18,530,490

 

 

 

(7,106,675

)

 

 

11,423,815

 

 

 

 

Venn at Main

 

Bellevue, WA

 

G

 

 

2016

 

 

350

 

 

 

26,626,497

 

 

 

151,652,048

 

 

 

226,783

 

 

 

26,626,497

 

 

 

151,878,831

 

 

 

178,505,328

 

 

 

(15,894,448

)

 

 

162,610,880

 

 

 

 

Wood Creek II (fka Willow Brook (CA))

 

Pleasant Hill, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

228

 

 

 

5,055,000

 

 

 

38,388,672

 

 

 

9,286,416

 

 

 

5,055,000

 

 

 

47,675,088

 

 

 

52,730,088

 

 

 

(25,490,323

)

 

 

27,239,765

 

 

 

 

Partially Owned Unencumbered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,847

 

 

 

93,406,899

 

 

 

391,476,556

 

 

 

40,014,354

 

 

 

93,406,899

 

 

 

431,490,910

 

 

 

524,897,809

 

 

 

(133,111,488

)

 

 

391,786,321

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partially Owned Encumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aero Apartments

 

Alameda, CA

 

G

 

 

(F)

 

 

 

 

 

13,107,242

 

 

 

18,347,948

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,107,242

 

 

 

18,347,948

 

 

 

31,455,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,455,190

 

 

 

7,049,636

 

Bellevue Meadows

 

Bellevue, WA

 

 

 

 

1983

 

 

180

 

 

 

4,507,100

 

 

 

12,574,814

 

 

 

5,863,119

 

 

 

4,507,100

 

 

 

18,437,933

 

 

 

22,945,033

 

 

 

(13,949,169

)

 

 

8,995,864

 

 

 

16,526,976

 

Description   Initial Cost to Company  Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(Improvements, net) (E) Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period 12/31/16        
Apartment NameLocation Retail/Commercial Space  Date of Construction Apartment Units (H) Land  Building & Fixtures Building & Fixtures Land Building & Fixtures (A) Total (B)Accumulated Depreciation (C)Investment in Real Estate, Net at 12/31/16 Encumbrances
SoMa Square Apartments (fka South Market)San Francisco, CA G 1986 410
 79,900,000
 177,316,977
 5,784,763
 79,900,000
 183,101,740
 263,001,740
 (31,584,442) 231,417,298
  (K)
Square OneSeattle, WA  2014 112
 7,222,544
 26,277,456
 18,949
 7,222,544
 26,296,405
 33,518,949
 (3,222,469) 30,296,480
  (L)
Summerset VillageChatsworth, CA  1985 280
 2,629,804
 23,670,889
 7,407,026
 2,629,804
 31,077,915
 33,707,719
 (21,189,393) 12,518,326
 37,994,251
TalleyrandTarrytown, NY  1997-1998 300
 12,000,000
 49,838,160
 5,280,338
 12,000,000
 55,118,498
 67,118,498
 (29,826,719) 37,291,779
 34,794,181
TeresinaChula Vista, CA  2000 440
 28,600,000
 61,916,670
 3,924,692
 28,600,000
 65,841,362
 94,441,362
 (27,199,505) 67,241,857
 39,353,690
ToscanaIrvine, CA  1991/1993 563
 39,410,000
 50,806,072
 13,015,608
 39,410,000
 63,821,680
 103,231,680
 (35,049,666) 68,182,014
 98,021,589
Touriel BuildingBerkeley, CA G 2004 35
 2,736,000
 7,810,027
 178,396
 2,736,000
 7,988,423
 10,724,423
 (3,056,587) 7,667,836
 4,965,054
Town Square at Mark Center I (fka Millbrook I)Alexandria, VA  1996 406
 24,360,000
 86,178,714
 5,090,465
 24,360,000
 91,269,179
 115,629,179
 (37,802,676) 77,826,503
 60,195,391
Vantage HollywoodLos Angeles, CA  1987 298
 42,580,326
 56,014,674
 126,527
 42,580,326
 56,141,201
 98,721,527
 (5,287,978) 93,433,549
 42,297,038
VersaillesWoodland Hills, CA  1991 253
 12,650,000
 33,656,292
 6,676,131
 12,650,000
 40,332,423
 52,982,423
 (19,770,723) 33,211,700
 30,337,321
Versailles (K-Town)Los Angeles, CA  2008 225
 10,590,975
 44,409,025
 1,443,140
 10,590,975
 45,852,165
 56,443,140
 (14,149,083) 42,294,057
 45,950,109
Victor on VeniceLos Angeles, CA G 2006 115
 10,350,000
 35,433,437
 651,436
 10,350,000
 36,084,873
 46,434,873
 (13,516,691) 32,918,182
  (J)
VintageOntario, CA  2005-2007 300
 7,059,230
 47,677,762
 991,090
 7,059,230
 48,668,852
 55,728,082
 (18,740,063) 36,988,019
 32,972,257
Vintage at 425 Broadway (fka Promenade)Santa Monica, CA G 1934/2001 58
 9,000,000
 13,961,523
 1,059,233
 9,000,000
 15,020,756
 24,020,756
 (2,968,658) 21,052,098
  (K)
West 54thNew York, NY G 2001 222
 60,900,000
 48,193,837
 1,803,032
 60,900,000
 49,996,869
 110,896,869
 (10,859,764) 100,037,105
 47,159,623
Westgate (fka Westgate I)Pasadena, CA  2010 480
 22,898,848
 133,559,573
 1,626,531
 22,898,848
 135,186,104
 158,084,952
 (27,829,027) 130,255,925
 95,942,439
WoodleafCampbell, CA  1984 178
 8,550,600
 16,988,183
 4,564,556
 8,550,600
 21,552,739
 30,103,339
 (13,279,360) 16,823,979
 17,803,590
Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances (1)  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 1,645,978,887
Wholly Owned Encumbered  
 
 21,196
 1,542,126,523
 4,432,306,521
 317,352,468
 1,542,126,523
 4,749,658,989
 6,291,785,512
 (1,497,361,379) 4,794,424,133
 3,818,071,013

  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Partially Owned Unencumbered:  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
2300 ElliottSeattle, WA  1992 92
 796,800
 7,173,725
 6,364,098
 796,800
 13,537,823
 14,334,623
 (10,501,930) 3,832,693
 
Canyon RidgeSan Diego, CA  1989 162
 4,869,448
 11,955,064
 3,764,545
 4,869,448
 15,719,609
 20,589,057
 (9,906,118) 10,682,939
 
Country OaksAgoura Hills, CA  1985 256
 6,105,000
 29,561,865
 6,382,976
 6,105,000
 35,944,841
 42,049,841
 (18,330,095) 23,719,746
 
Harrison Square (fka Elliot Bay)Seattle, WA G 1992 166
 7,600,000
 35,844,345
 4,889,669
 7,600,000
 40,734,014
 48,334,014
 (7,462,882) 40,871,132
 
Monterra in Mill CreekMill Creek, WA  2003 139
 2,800,000
 13,255,123
 935,693
 2,800,000
 14,190,816
 16,990,816
 (6,101,965) 10,888,851
 
RosecliffQuincy, MA  1990 156
 5,460,000
 15,721,570
 3,246,786
 5,460,000
 18,968,356
 24,428,356
 (11,421,082) 13,007,274
 
Strayhorse at Arrowhead RanchGlendale, AZ  1998 136
 4,400,000
 12,968,002
 699,374
 4,400,000
 13,667,376
 18,067,376
 (5,724,191) 12,343,185
 
Via Ventura (CA) (fka Ventura)Ventura, CA  2002 192
 8,600,000
 44,308,202
 703,519
 8,600,000
 45,011,721
 53,611,721
 (9,035,652) 44,576,069
 
Wood Creek II (fka Willow Brook (CA))Pleasant Hill, CA  1985 228
 5,055,000
 38,388,672
 6,380,861
 5,055,000
 44,769,533
 49,824,533
 (20,343,063) 29,481,470
 
Partially Owned Unencumbered  
 
 1,527
 45,686,248
 209,176,568
 33,367,521
 45,686,248
 242,544,089
 288,230,337
 (98,826,978) 189,403,359
 

  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Partially Owned Encumbered:  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Bellevue MeadowsBellevue, WA  1983 180
 4,507,100
 12,574,814
 5,224,512
 4,507,100
 17,799,326
 22,306,426
 (12,054,134) 10,252,292
 16,493,902
Canyon Creek (CA)San Ramon, CA  1984 268
 5,425,000
 18,812,120
 7,124,649
 5,425,000
 25,936,769
 31,361,769
 (14,964,999) 16,396,770
 28,108,382
Lantern CoveFoster City, CA  1985 232
 6,945,000
 23,064,976
 6,190,412
 6,945,000
 29,255,388
 36,200,388
 (16,167,257) 20,033,131
 36,395,508
Schooner Bay IFoster City, CA  1985 168
 5,345,000
 20,390,618
 5,003,636
 5,345,000
 25,394,254
 30,739,254
 (14,020,421) 16,718,833
 28,811,122
Schooner Bay IIFoster City, CA  1985 144
 4,550,000
 18,064,764
 4,440,120
 4,550,000
 22,504,884
 27,054,884
 (12,562,453) 14,492,431
 26,116,380
Surrey DownsBellevue, WA  1986 122
 3,057,100
 7,848,618
 2,931,955
 3,057,100
 10,780,573
 13,837,673
 (6,893,799) 6,943,874
 9,801,248
Virgil SquareLos Angeles, CA  1979 142
 5,500,000
 15,216,613
 2,761,807
 5,500,000
 17,978,420
 23,478,420
 (7,925,733) 15,552,687
 9,869,581
Wisconsin PlaceChevy Chase, MD  2009 432
 
 172,089,355
 1,021,679
 
 173,111,034
 173,111,034
 (27,622,092) 145,488,942
 145,513,689
Partially Owned Encumbered      1,688
 35,329,200
 288,061,878
 34,698,770
 35,329,200
 322,760,648
 358,089,848
 (112,210,888) 245,878,960
 301,109,812

  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
Total Consolidated Investment in Real Estate  
 
 76,513
 $6,100,178,215
 $17,959,193,878
 $1,327,053,382
 $6,100,178,215
 $19,286,247,260
 $25,386,425,475
 $(5,360,389,416) $20,026,036,059
 $4,119,180,825

(1)See attached Encumbrances Reconciliation.



S-10



EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 20162019

Description

 

 

Initial Cost to

Company

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Acquisition

(Improvements,

net) (E)

 

 

Gross Amount Carried at

Close of Period 12/31/19

 

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Retail/

Commercial

Space

 

 

Date of

Construction

 

Apartment

Units

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Building &

Fixtures

 

 

Land

 

 

Building &

Fixtures (A)

 

 

Total (B)

 

 

Accumulated

Depreciation (C)

 

 

Investment

in Real

Estate, Net at

12/31/19

 

 

Encumbrances

 

Canyon Creek (CA)

 

San Ramon, CA

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

268

 

 

 

5,425,000

 

 

 

18,812,120

 

 

 

7,911,730

 

 

 

5,425,000

 

 

 

26,723,850

 

 

 

32,148,850

 

 

 

(18,327,786

)

 

 

13,821,064

 

 

 

28,171,906

 

Lantern Cove

 

Foster City, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

232

 

 

 

6,945,000

 

 

 

23,064,976

 

 

 

7,320,624

 

 

 

6,945,000

 

 

 

30,385,600

 

 

 

37,330,600

 

 

 

(19,807,488

)

 

 

17,523,112

 

 

 

36,439,783

 

Schooner Bay I

 

Foster City, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

168

 

 

 

5,345,000

 

 

 

20,390,618

 

 

 

5,854,156

 

 

 

5,345,000

 

 

 

26,244,774

 

 

 

31,589,774

 

 

 

(17,054,268

)

 

 

14,535,506

 

 

 

28,854,243

 

Schooner Bay II

 

Foster City, CA

 

 

 

 

1985

 

 

144

 

 

 

4,550,000

 

 

 

18,064,764

 

 

 

5,376,714

 

 

 

4,550,000

 

 

 

23,441,478

 

 

 

27,991,478

 

 

 

(15,168,558

)

 

 

12,822,920

 

 

 

26,159,132

 

Surrey Downs

 

Bellevue, WA

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

122

 

 

 

3,057,100

 

 

 

7,848,618

 

 

 

3,532,712

 

 

 

3,057,100

 

 

 

11,381,330

 

 

 

14,438,430

 

 

 

(8,356,388

)

 

 

6,082,042

 

 

 

9,829,000

 

Virgil Square

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

 

 

1979

 

 

142

 

 

 

5,500,000

 

 

 

15,216,613

 

 

 

3,380,225

 

 

 

5,500,000

 

 

 

18,596,838

 

 

 

24,096,838

 

 

 

(10,021,205

)

 

 

14,075,633

 

 

 

9,893,916

 

Wisconsin Place

 

Chevy Chase, MD

 

 

 

 

2009

 

 

432

 

 

 

 

 

 

172,089,355

 

 

 

1,550,321

 

 

 

 

 

 

173,639,676

 

 

 

173,639,676

 

 

 

(48,686,702

)

 

 

124,952,974

 

 

 

147,953,509

 

Partially Owned Encumbered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,688

 

 

 

48,436,442

 

 

 

306,409,826

 

 

 

40,789,601

 

 

 

48,436,442

 

 

 

347,199,427

 

 

 

395,635,869

 

 

 

(151,371,564

)

 

 

244,264,305

 

 

 

310,878,101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Consolidated Investment in Real Estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

79,962

 

 

$

6,024,179,752

 

 

$

19,701,445,539

 

 

$

1,807,982,135

 

 

$

6,024,179,752

 

 

$

21,509,427,674

 

 

$

27,533,607,426

 

 

$

(7,276,786,374

)

 

$

20,256,821,052

 

 

$

1,941,609,552

 

(1)See attached Encumbrances Reconciliation.

S-11


Table of Contents

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2019

NOTES:

NOTES:

(A)

The balance of furniture & fixtures included in the total investment in real estate amount was $1,346,300,284$1,916,458,010 as of December 31, 2016.2019.

(B)

The cost, net of accumulated depreciation, for Federal Income Tax purposes as of December 31, 20162019 was approximately $15.8$13.7 billion (unaudited).

(C)

The life to compute depreciation for building is 30 years, for building improvements ranges from 5 to 15 years, for furniture & fixtures, replacements and replacementsrenovations is 5 to 10 years and for lease intangibles is the average remaining term of each respective lease.

(D)

This asset consists of various acquisition dates and largely represents furniture, fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements and capitalizedcomputer equipment and software costs owned by the Management Business, which are generally depreciated over periods ranging from 3 to 7 years.

(E)

Primarily represents capital expenditures for major maintenancebuilding improvements, replacements and replacementsrenovations incurred subsequent to each property’s acquisition date.

(F)

Represents

Primarily represents land and/or construction-in-progress on projects either held for future development or projects currently under development.

(G)

A portion of these properties includes and/or will include retail/commercial space.space (including parking garages).

(H)

(H)

Total properties and apartment units exclude two unconsolidated properties containing 945 apartment units.
(I)Through (K) 

See Encumbrances Reconciliation schedule.

(L)

(I)

Boot property for Bond Partnership mortgage pool.






S-11


EXHIBIT INDEX
The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this report. References to exhibits or other filings under the caption “Location” indicate that the exhibit or other filing has been filed, that the indexed exhibit and the exhibit referred to are the same and that the exhibit referred to is incorporated by reference. The Commission file numbers for our Exchange Act filings referenced below are 1-12252 (Equity Residential) and 0-24920 (ERP Operating Limited Partnership).
ExhibitDescriptionLocation
3.1Articles of Restatement of Declaration of Trust of Equity Residential dated December 9, 2004.Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Residential’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
3.2Eighth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Equity Residential, effective as of October 1, 2015.Included as Exhibit 3.1 to Equity Residential's Form 8-K dated and filed on October 1, 2015.
3.3Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership for ERP Operating Limited Partnership dated as of March 12, 2009.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated March 12, 2009, filed on March 18, 2009.
4.1Indenture, dated October 1, 1994, between the Operating Partnership and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee (“Indenture”).Included as Exhibit 4(a) to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form S-3 filed on October 7, 1994.
4.2First Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of September 9, 2004.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on September 10, 2004.
4.3Second Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of August 23, 2006.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated August 16, 2006, filed on August 23, 2006.
4.4Third Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2007.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated May 30, 2007, filed on June 1, 2007.
4.5Fourth Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of December 12, 2011.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated December 7, 2011, filed on December 9, 2011.
4.6Fifth Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2016.Included as Exhibit 4.6 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
4.7Form of 5.75% Note due June 15, 2017.Included as Exhibit 4.3 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated May 30, 2007, filed on June 1, 2007.
4.8
Terms Agreement regarding 7.125%Notes due October 15, 2017.
Included as Exhibit 1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on October 9, 1997.
4.9Form of 2.375% Note due July 1, 2019.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated June 16, 2014, filed on June 18, 2014.
4.10Form of 4.75% Note due July 15, 2020.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K dated July 12, 2010, filed on July 15, 2010.
4.11Form of 4.625% Note due December 15, 2021.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated December 7, 2011, filed on December 9, 2011.
4.12Form of 3.00% Note due April 15, 2023.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated April 3, 2013, filed on April 8, 2013.
4.13Form of 3.375% Note due June 1, 2025.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated May 11, 2015, filed on May 13, 2015.
4.14Terms Agreement regarding 7.57% Notes due August 15, 2026.Included as Exhibit 1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on August 13, 1996.
4.15Form of 2.850% Note due November 1, 2026.Included as Exhibit 4.1 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated October 4, 2016, filed on October 7, 2016.
4.16Form of 4.500% Note due July 1, 2044.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated June 16, 2014, filed on June 18, 2014.
4.17Form of 4.500% Note due June 1, 2045.Included as Exhibit 4.2 to ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated May 11, 2015, filed on May 13, 2015.
10.1*Noncompetition Agreement (Zell).Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential's Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158.
10.2*Noncompetition Agreement (Spector).Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential's Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158.
10.3*Form of Noncompetition Agreement (other officers).Included as an exhibit to Equity Residential's Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158.










ExhibitDescriptionLocation
10.4Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of January 11, 2013 among ERP Operating Limited Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners, and a syndicate of other banks (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”).Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated January 11, 2013, filed January 15, 2013.
10.5Guaranty of Payment made as of January 11, 2013 between Equity Residential and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the banks party to the Revolving Credit Agreement.Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated January 11, 2013, filed January 15, 2013.
10.6Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of January 16, 2015 among ERP Operating Limited Partnership, the Banks party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents, and the other Agents named therein.Included as Exhibit 10.6 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
10.7Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 3, 2016 among ERP Operating Limited Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, and a syndicate of other banks (the “Credit Agreement”).Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed November 3, 2016.
10.8Guaranty of Payment made as of November 3, 2016 between Equity Residential and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the banks party to the Credit Agreement.Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed November 3, 2016.
10.9Master Credit Facility Agreement, dated February 27, 2013, by and among Federal National Mortgage Association and ASN Santa Monica LLC, et al.Included as Exhibit 10.7 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.
10.10Amended and Restated Fixed Loan Note (Collateral Pool 3), dated February 27, 2013, executed by ASN Santa Monica LLC, et al. in favor of Federal National Mortgage Association.Included as Exhibit 10.8 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.
10.11Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Lexford Properties, L.P.Included as Exhibit 10.16 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.
10.12*Equity Residential 2011 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 99.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated June 16, 2011, filed on June 22, 2011.
10.13*First Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012.
10.14*Second Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013.
10.15*Third Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014.
10.16*Fourth Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014.
10.17*Fifth Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016.
10.18*Sixth Amendment to 2011 Share Incentive Plan.Attached herein.
10.19*Equity Residential Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan dated December 10, 2008.Included as Exhibit 10.15 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
10.20*First Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.
10.21*Second Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.3 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011.
10.22*Third Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012.



ExhibitDescriptionLocation
10.23*Fourth Amendment to Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan.Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013.
10.24*Form of 2015 Performance Award Agreement.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015.
10.25*Form of Change in Control/Severance Agreement between the Company and other executive officers.Included as Exhibit 10.13 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
10.26*Form of First Amendment to Amended and Restated Change in Control/Severance Agreement with each executive officer.Included as Exhibit 10.1 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009.
10.27*Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each trustee and executive officer.Included as Exhibit 10.18 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.28*Form of Letter Agreement between Equity Residential and each of David J. Neithercut, Alan W. George and Bruce C. Strohm.Included as Exhibit 10.3 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.
10.29*Form of Executive Retirement Benefits Agreement.Included as Exhibit 10.24 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.30*Retirement Benefits Agreement between Samuel Zell and the Company dated October 18, 2001.Included as Exhibit 10.18 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
10.31*Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Agreement between the Company and Gerald A. Spector dated January 1, 2002.Included as Exhibit 10.17 to Equity Residential's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
10.32*The Equity Residential Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated effective July 1, 2014.Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014.
10.33*The Equity Residential Grandfathered Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2005.Included as Exhibit 10.2 to Equity Residential's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008.
10.34Second Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated July 31, 2013, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated.Included as Exhibit 1.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed on July 31, 2013.
10.35Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated July 31, 2013, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC.Included as Exhibit 1.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed on July 31, 2013.
10.36Second Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated July 31, 2013, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.Included as Exhibit 1.3 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed on July 31, 2013.
10.37Second Amended and Restated Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated July 31, 2013, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC.Included as Exhibit 1.4 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed on July 31, 2013.
10.38Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated July 31, 2013, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc.Included as Exhibit 1.5 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed on July 31, 2013.
10.39Distribution Agreement, dated June 29, 2016, among the Company, the Operating Partnership, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Mitsubishi UFJ Securities (USA), Inc., Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. and UBS Securities LLC.Included as Exhibit 1.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated and filed on June 29, 2016.
10.40Archstone Residual JV, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.Included as Exhibit 10.3 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.



ExhibitDescriptionLocation
10.41Archstone Parallel Residual JV, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.Included as Exhibit 10.4 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.
10.42Archstone Parallel Residual JV 2, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.Included as Exhibit 10.5 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.
10.43Legacy Holdings JV, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.Included as Exhibit 10.6 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated February 27, 2013, filed on February 28, 2013.
10.44Real Estate Sale Agreement, dated October 23, 2015, by and among ERP Operating Limited Partnership, certain of its affiliates, and SCG Atlas Acquisition, L.P. (the "Real Estate Sale Agreement").Included as Exhibit 2.1 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated October 23, 2015, filed on October 26, 2015.
10.45Schedule of Agreements Substantially Identical in all Material Respects to the Real Estate Sale Agreement.Included as Exhibit 2.2 to Equity Residential's and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Form 8-K dated October 23, 2015, filed on October 26, 2015.
12Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges.Attached herein.
21List of Subsidiaries of Equity Residential and ERP Operating Limited Partnership.Attached herein.
23.1Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - Equity Residential.Attached herein.
23.2Consent of Ernst & Young LLP - ERP Operating Limited Partnership.Attached herein.
24Power of Attorney.See the signature page to this report.
31.1Equity Residential - Certification of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer.Attached herein.
31.2Equity Residential - Certification of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer.Attached herein.
31.3ERP Operating Limited Partnership - Certification of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant's General Partner.Attached herein.
31.4ERP Operating Limited Partnership - Certification of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant's General Partner.Attached herein.
32.1Equity Residential - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of the Company.Attached herein.
32.2Equity Residential - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company.Attached herein.
32.3ERP Operating Limited Partnership - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant's General Partner.Attached herein.
32.4ERP Operating Limited Partnership - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant's General Partner.Attached herein.
101XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from Equity Residential’s and ERP Operating Limited Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL: (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, (iii) consolidated statements of cash flows, (iv) consolidated statements of changes in equity (Equity Residential), (v) consolidated statements of changes in capital (ERP Operating Limited Partnership) and (vi) notes to consolidated financial statements.Attached herein.
*Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements filed as exhibits to this report are identified by an asterisk.


S-12