1217270v3
                                    FORM 10-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   (Mark One)

            [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                   For the fiscal year ended December 31, 19992000
                                       OR

          [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                        For the transition period from to

                         Commission file number 1-13165

                                 CRYOLIFE, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

            Florida                                           59-2417093
(State or other jurisdiction of                            (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                           Identification No.)

                 1655 Roberts Boulevard N.W., Kennesaw, GA 30144
               (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (770) 419-3355

                    Securities registered pursuant to Section
                               12(b) of the Act:

                                                        Name of each exchange
          Title of each class                             on which registered
  - - -------------------------------                     ---------------------------------------------------
   Common Stock, $.01 par value                        New York Stock Exchange
  Preferred Share Purchase Rights                      New York Stock Exchange

     Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

     None

     Indicate  by check mark  whether the  registrant  (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter  period that the registrant
was  required  to file such  reports),  and (2) has been  subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. __X__[X] Yes _____[  ] No

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent  filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's  knowledge,  in definitive proxy or information  statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]

     The  aggregate  market value of voting stock held by  nonaffiliates  of the
registrant was approximately $231,500,000$398,777,000 at March 24, 2000 (10,522,76227, 2001 (16,060,309 shares).
The  number of  common  shares  outstanding  at March  24,  200027,  2001 was  12,286,19618,750,704
(exclusive of treasury shares).

                       Documents Incorporated By Reference

     Part III: Portions of Registrant's  Proxy Statement  relating to the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be filed not later than April 29, 2000.30, 2001.


                                     PART I

Item 1. Business.

Overview

CryoLife,   Inc.   ("CryoLife"   or  the   "Company")   is  the  leader  in  the
cryopreservation  of viable  human  tissues  for  cardiovascular,  vascular  and
orthopaedic transplant applications,  and develops and commercializes additional
implantable  products,  including bioprosthetic
cardiovascular  products  and  surgical  bioadhesives,  and  single- use medical
devices.bioadhesives.  The Company estimates
that it provided approximatelyin excess of 70% of the cryopreserved  human heart valve tissue
implanted in the U.S. in 1998.2000.  The Company uses its  expertise in  biochemistry
and cell  biology,  and its  understanding  of the needs of the  cardiovascular,
vascular and orthopaedic surgery medical  specialties,  to continue expansion of
its core  cryopreservation  business  and to develop  or  acquire  complementary
implantable products and technologies for these fields. The Company develops and
markets  proprietary  implantable  biomaterials,  including  BioGlue(R) surgical
adhesive, which it began commercializing within the European Community ("EC") in
April  1998 and within the U.S.  in  December  1999.  Additionally  the  Company
develops  bioprosthetic   cardiovascular  devices  including  two  novel  design
stentless  porcine heart valves  currently  marketed in the European
Community.   The  Company  also  develops   proprietary   implantable   surgical
bioadhesives,    including   BioGlue   surgical   adhesive,   which   it   began
commercializing for vascular applications within the European Community in April
1998.EC. In addition,November 2000
the Company serves as an Original  Equipment  Manufacturerreceived a Conformite Europeene ("OEM"CE") manufacturer,  throughMark (product  certification)
for  commercial  distribution  of its  Ideas For Medicine,  Inc. ("IFM") subsidiary,SynerGraft(R)  heart  valve  in  the  EC.
Domestically the Company began applying its proprietary SynerGraft technology in
February 2000 to enhance the preservation of single-use medical devices for use in vascular surgical procedures.human heart valves.

CryoLife processes and distributes for transplantation cryopreserved human heart
valves and conduits,  human vascular tissue and human connective  tissue for the
knee.  Management  believes that  cryopreserved  human heart valves and conduits
offer  certain   advantages  over  mechanical,   synthetic  and   animal-derived
alternatives.  Depending on the  alternative,  these  advantages  include a more
natural functionality,  the elimination of a chroniclong-term need for anti-coagulation
drug  therapy,  a  reduced  incidence  of  reoperation  and a  reduced  risk  of
catastrophic  failure,  thromboembolism  (stroke) or calcification.  The Company
estimates  that the potential U.S.  market for  implantable  products  targeting
indications  addressed by the cryopreserved tissues processed by the Company was
in excess of $1 billion in 2000. The Company seeks to expand the availability of
human tissue through its  established  relationships  with over 250100 tissue banks
and organ procurement agencies nationwide.

CryoLife is developing  implantable  biomaterials for use as surgical  adhesives
and sealants. The Company's patent protected BioGlue surgical adhesive, designed
for cardiovascular, vascular and pulmonary applications, is a polymer based on a
derivative of an animal blood protein and a cross-linking  agent. BioGlue offers
advantages over sutures and staples, including more effective sealing and easier
application. The Company estimates that the annual worldwide market for surgical
sutures and staples in 2000 was in excess of $2 billion. The Company received CE
Mark  certification in 1998 for use of its BioGlue surgical adhesive in vascular
applications  and began marketing this product in April 1998 in the EC. In March
1999 the  Company was  awarded a second CE Mark  allowing  the use of BioGlue in
pulmonary  indications,  including the repair of air leaks in lungs. In December
1999 the Company received U.S. Food and Drug Administration  ("FDA") approval to
distribute  BioGlue  surgical  adhesive  under a Humanitarian  Device  Exemption
("HDE") for use as an adjunct in the repair of acute thoracic aortic dissections
and immediately  began  marketing this product in the U.S.  pursuant to the HDE.
The Company  completed its clinical trial for the use of BioGlue in all vascular
repair in the fall of 2000, and filed a premarket  approval ("PMA") with the FDA
on  February 1, 2001 that,  if  approved,  would allow for the broad  commercial
distribution of BioGlue in the U.S.

CryoLife  has   developed  and  markets   outside  of  the  U.S.   bioprosthetic
cardiovascular devices for implantation,  currently consisting of glutaraldehyde
fixed stentless porcine heart valves.  FixedGlutaraldehyde fixed porcine heart valves
are often  preferred  by surgeons  for  procedures  involving  elderly  patients
because  they  eliminate  the  risk of  patient  non-compliance  with  long-term
anti-coagulation  drug  therapy  associated  with  mechanical  valves,  are less
expensive  than  human  heart  valves or  mechanical  valves  and their  shorter
longevity is more appropriately  matched with these patients' life expectancies.
Glutaraldehyde  fixed porcine and bovine heart valves address a worldwide target
market estimated to have been $325 million in 2000.  Unlike most other available


                                       2


porcine  heart  valves,  the  Company's  stentless  porcine  heart valves do not
contain  synthetic  stentsmaterials  which  increase  the  risk  of  endocarditis,   a
debilitating and potentially fatal bacterial  infection. The Company's  CryoLife-O'BrienCryoLife-O'Brien(R)
aortic heart valve,  currently  marketed in the European CommunityEC and certain other countriesterritories
outside the U.S., is a stentless  porcine  heart valve which  contains a matched
composite  leaflet  design  that  approximates  human  heart  valve  blood  flow
characteristics and requires only a single suture line which simplifies surgical
implantation.  The Company's  CryoLife-RossCryoLife-Ross(R) pulmonary heart valve, another of
the Company's  fixed stentless  porcine  valves,  is also marketed in the European  CommunityEC and
certain  countries  outside the U.S.  The  Company  has applied its  proprietary
SynerGraft  technology to itsthe  processing of human heart valves and conduits and
to some of itsthe Company's stentless porcine heart valves. SynerGraft involves the
depopulation  of living
cells from the  structure of human heart tissues  to  allowtissue and  non-viable
animal  heart  tissue  leaving a collagen  matrix that has the  potential  for
repopulation of such tissue with recipient  cells.  In animal  studies,  porcine
valves which were  depopulated by the SynerGraft  process wereto be
repopulated  with cells from the valve recipient.implant  recipient's  cells.  This  process is designed to
reduce  calcification  of heart valves,  thereby  increasing  longevity,  and more generally to
improve the  biocompatibility and functionality of such tissue. In November 2000
the Company received CE Mark approval for its SynerGraft porcine pulmonary heart
valves, which allowed the Company to begin commercial  distribution into the EC.
The Company believes that its porcine heart valves,  when treated with the SynerGraft
technology, will expand its opportunity to address the broader international and
U.S. heart valve markets.

CryoLife is developing  implantable  biomaterials for use as surgical  adhesivesmarkets,  estimated to have been $390 million and sealants. The Company's patent protected BioGlue surgical adhesive, designed
for cardiovascular, peripheral vascular and pulmonary applications, is a polymer
based  on a  derivative  of a blood  protein  and a  cross  linking  agent.  The
Company's  patent  protected  FibRx  surgical   sealant,   designed  for  tissue
hemostasis and suture line sealing, is a light activated, biodegradable surgical
sealant  under  development  which is based on a  derivative  of the human blood
factors  fibrinogen and thrombin.  Both of these  products may offer  advantages
over  sutures  and  staples,   including  more  effective   sealing  and  easier
application. The Company estimates that the annual worldwide market for surgical

                                       2


sutures and staples$400 million,
respectively, in 1999 was in excess of $2 billion. The Company received CE
Mark  Certification in 1998 for use of its BioGlue surgical adhesive in vascular
applications  and began  marketing  this  product in April 1998 in the  European
Community. Following the approval of the Food and Drug Administration to conduct
human  clinical  studies  for  BioGlue  surgical  adhesive  as an adjunct in the
surgical  repair of acute  thoracic  aortic  dissections,  the Company  filed an
application  with FDA to market the  product  for this use under a  Humanitarian
Service  Exemption.  In December,  1999, the Company received US FDA approval of
the HDE and  immediately  began  marketing this product for use in the repair of
acute thoracic aortic  dissections in the U.S. pursuant to the HDE.2000.

Beginning in 1998,  the Company  began  seeking to complete a potential  private
placement  of equity  or  equity-oriented  securities  to formrepresenting  a  minority-owned subsidarymajority
investment in its wholly-owned  subsidiary  company,  AuraZyme  Pharmaceuticals,
LLC (AuraZyme)Inc.  ("AuraZyme"),  for the commercial  development  of its photo-activatedActivation  Control
Technology  ("ACT")  technology.  The  ACT  technology  is a  reversible  inhibitorlinker
technology  (FibRx),  includingthat has potential uses in the FibRx
adhesive. Suchareas of cancer  therapy,  blood clot
dissolving,  heart attack therapies and other drug delivery  applications.  This
strategy  is  designed  to allow the  Company to  continue  development  of this
technology without incurring  additional research and development  expenditures,
other than through Aurazyme,AuraZyme, and allow the Company to focus its resources on the
commercial  development of its BioGlue surgical adhesive,  SynerGraft technology
and other products under development.  As of  December  31, 1999 a portion of the
Company's  assets  relating to the  development of FibRx have been classified as
available  for sale pending the  identification  of a corporate  partner to fund
future development.

Prior to October 1, 1998 CryoLife manufactured and distributed,  through its IFM
subsidiary,   single-use  medical  devices,  including  endarterectomy  surgical
instruments,  intravascular  shunts,  infusion  ports,  accessories  utilized in
laparoscopic  procedures  and a wide  range of  single  and dual  lumen  balloon
catheters.  On September 30, 1998, the Company sold substantially all of its IFM
product line to Horizon Medical Products,  Inc. ("Horizon") pursuant to an asset
purchase agreement. As part of this agreement, the Company committed to continue
manufacturing  the IFM product line as an OEM  manufacturer of such products for
Horizon for four years. Thereafter,  responsibility for such manufacturing is to
be assumed by Horizon.  On June 22, 1999,  IFM  notified  Horizon that it was in
default  of  certain  provisions  of its OEM  Manufacturing  Agreement  with the
Company.  The  Company  has been  negotiating  with  Horizon in order to reach a
mutually  agreeable  solution to the default;  however,  due to the  significant
uncertainties related to the Company's ability to realize its investment in IFM,
the Company  determined  in the fourth  quarter of 1999 that it had  incurred an
impairment loss on its IFM assets. See "Management's Discussions and Analysis of
Financial  Condition  and Results of  Operations"  contained  elsewhere  in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K .

In the U.S., the Company markets its  cryopreservation  services for human heart
valves and conduits,  human vascular  tissue and its BioGlue  surgical  adhesive for
use in the  repair of acute  thoracic  aortic  dissections
through its direct technical service representatives,  and relies on independent
orthopaedic sales  representatives to market its  cryopreservation  services for
human  connective  tissue  for the knee.  Internationally,  cryopreserved  human
tissues, bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices, including SynerGraft, and BioGlue
surgical adhesive are distributed through independent representatives located in
several countries in Europe, Canada, South America and Asia.


Growth Strategy

The Company's primary objective is to continue its consistent revenue growth and
its
profitability.  The Company's  strategy to generate continued growth is based on
increasing the use of cryopreserved  tissues as an alternative to mechanical and
synthetic implantable products, developing new markets for existing products and
technologies  and developing new products and  technologies for new and existing
markets.  The Company  also  selectively  considers  strategic  acquisitions  of
complementary technologies and businesses to supplement its internal growth. The
key elements of the Company's business and growth strategy are to:

     o    Continue  Leadership  in  Cryopreservation  of Human Heart  Valves and
          Conduits.  The Company  intends to increase the market  penetration of
          its  cryopreserved  human heart valves and  conduits by (i)  expanding
          awareness  of  clinical  advantages  of  cryopreserved  human  tissues
          through  continuing   educational   efforts  directed  to  physicians,
          prospective heart valve and conduit  recipients and tissue procurement
          agencies,  (ii)  expanding  its  relationships  with the more than 250100
          tissue  banks and  procurement  agencies  across  the U.S.  which directsend
          tissue  to the  Company  for  cryopreservation,  (iii)  expanding  its
          physician training activities and (iv) expanding its product offerings
          by  utilizing  the  first  ofapplying  its

                                       3
  SynerGraft  technology  applications to develop depopulated human  heart  valves and
          conduits  withfor  antigen  reduction  properties  and the  potential  for
          recipient cell repopulation.


                                       -3


     o    Expand   Distribution  of  Cryopreserved  Human  Vascular  Tissue  and
          Connective  Tissue  for the  Knee.  Using  the  same  strategy  it has
          successfully  employed  to expand its  distribution  of  cryopreservedcryopreservation  services  for
          human heart valves and conduits,  the Company  intends to increase its
          cryopreservation  revenues from human  vascular  tissue and connective
          tissue for the knee through continuing educational efforts directed to
          vascular and  orthopaedic  surgeons  about the clinical  advantages of
          cryopreserved   vascular  and   orthopaedic   tissue,   expanding  its
          relationships with tissue banks and procurement agencies and expanding
          its   programs  for   training   physicians   in  the  use  of  tissue
          cryopreserved by the Company.

     -o    Broaden  Application of  Cryopreservation  Services.  The Company will
          continue to collect,  monitor and evaluate implant data to (i) develop
          expanded uses for the human  tissues  currently  cryopreserved  by the
          Company  and  (ii)  identify  new  human  tissues  as  candidates  for
          cryopreservation.  In 1997, the Company began providing  cryopreserved
          human vascular tissue to be used as dialysis access replacement grafts
          for patients  undergoing long-termchronic dialysis,  and separately,  as venous
          valve  replacements for patients suffering from diseases of the venous
          system.  In 1998 in addition to patellar  and  achilles  tendons,  the
          Company began providing  cryopreserved posterior tibialis,and anterior tibialis
          and semi t/semi-t/gracilis tendons for use in knee repairs, and in 1999 began
          providing  preserved human  osteoarticular  grafts to repair articular
          defects and  aortoiliac  grafts to repair  infected  abdominal  aortic
          aneurysms.grafts.  The Company is also  investigating  the use of  cryopreserved
          human  endothelial  cells,  peripheral  nerves  and  spinal
          disksother  connective
          tissues in various surgical applications.

     -o    Develop and  Commercialize  Biomaterials  for  Surgical  Adhesive  and
          Sealant Applications.  In the second quarter of 1998 the Company began
          commercializingcommercial marketing of its patent protected BioGlue surgical adhesive
          in the European CommunityEC through its existing  independent  representatives.  In April 1998December 1999
          the Company  received  approval under an  Investigational
          Device Exemption (IDE) to conduct clinical trials for BioGlue surgical
          adhesive in the U.S., and in December 1999 received US  FDA  approval to  distribute  BioGlue  surgical
          adhesive  under a Humanitarian  Device
          Exemption  ("HDE")HDE for use as an  adjunct  in the  repair  of acute
          thoracic aortic dissections.  The Company has  receivedcompleted its clinical trial
          for the use of BioGlue in all vascular repair in the fall of 2000, and
          filed a PMA with the FDA on February 1, 2001, that, if approved, would
          allow for the broad commercial  distribution of BioGlue in the U.S.  FDA
          approval to and will commence clinical trials under a supplemental IDE
          for use in general vascular and selected cardiac repairs.  The Company
          has formed a subsidiary to raise equity or  equity-related  capital in
          order to continue  development of its patent  protected FibRx surgical
          sealant. In
          addition  to  the   adhesive   and  sealant   applications   of  these
          biomaterials,  the  Company  intends to  pursue,  either  directly  or
          through  strategic  alliances,  certain potential  drug delivery  applications of
          BioGlue   surgical   adhesive   and  FibRx surgical sealant,its  ACT   technology,   such  as
          administering  antibiotics,  attaching  chemotherapy  drugs to tumors,
          delivering  growth  agents  or  delivering  bone  chipsmaterial  for  orthopaedic  bone  repair.

     -repair,  and  as a
          replacement for spinal discs.

     o    Develop and Commercialize  Bioprosthetic  Cardiovascular  Devices. The
          Company  intends to leverage its expertise with stentless  human heart
          valves to expand  commercialization  of its  stentless  porcine  heart
          valves and to use its stentless porcine heart valves as a platform for
          the  development  and  commercialization  of the Company's  SynerGraft
          technology.  The Company has expanded its production  capacity for its
          bioprosthetic  cardiovascular  devices to address the increased demand
          it  is  currently  experiencing.   Separately,  the  Company's  patent
          protected  SynerGraft  technology,  which is being  developed to expand the target market for
          the stentless porcine heart valves by minimizing  calcification  often
          associated   with  porcine  tissues  and  thereby   increasing   their
          longevity. -In October 2000 the Company received a CE Mark allowing for
          commercial distribution of the new tissue-engineered  SynerGraft heart
          valve throughout the European Community.  The Company has expanded its
          production  capacity for its bioprosthetic  cardiovascular  devices to
          address the increased demand it is currently experiencing.

     o    Leverage Existing Capability across Product Lines. The Company intends
          to apply its  expertise  with  stentless  human heart valves to expand
          commercialization of its stentless porcine heart valves and to use its
          human  heart  valvesvalve and  conduitsconduit  cryopreservation  expertise  and its
          stentless  porcine heart valves as a platform for the  development and
          commercialization of the Company's SynerGraft technology.


New  complementary  products under
          development include modified single and double lumen balloon catheters
          for use in delivering the Company's implantable bioadhesives.

                                       4
Services and Products

Cryopreservation of Human Tissue for Transplant/Living Biologic DevicesTransplant

The Company's proprietary and patent protected cryopreservation process involves
the procurement of tissue from deceased human donors,  the timely and controlled
delivery of such tissue  procured  from deceased
human  donors to the Company, the screening, disinfection,  dissection


                                       4


and  cryopreservation of the tissue by the Company,  the storage and shipment of
the cryopreserved  tissue and the controlled thawing of the tissue.  Thereafter,
the tissue is surgically implanted into a human recipient.

The transplant of human tissue that has not been preserved must be  accomplished
within extremely short time limits (not to exceed eight hours for transplants of
the human heart).  Prior to the advent of human tissue  cryopreservation,  these
time constraints resulted in the inability to use much of the tissue donated for
transplantation.  The application byof the Company  of  itsCompany's cryopreservation technologies
to donated tissue expands the amount of human tissue available to physicians for
transplantation.  Cryopreservation  also expands the treatment options available
to  physicians  and their  patients  by  offering  alternatives  to  implantable
mechanical,   synthetic  and  animal-derived   devices.  The  tissues  presently
cryopreserved  by the Company include human heart valves and conduits,  vascular
tissue and connective tissue for the knee.

CryoLife  maintains  and  collects  extensive  clinical  data  on  the  use  and
effectiveness of implanted human tissues that it has  cryopreserved,  and shares
this data with implanting physicians.physicians and its procurement  partners.  The Company
also uses  this data to help  direct  its  continuing  efforts  to  improve  its
cryopreservation services through ongoing research and development. Its research
staff and technical  representatives  assist physicians by providing educational
materials,  seminars  and clinics on methods for  handling  and  implanting  the
tissue cryopreserved by the Company and the clinical advantages, indications and
applications  for those  tissues.  The Company has ongoing  efforts to train and
educate  physicians  on the  indications  for  and  uses  of itsthe  human  tissues
cryopreserved  tissues,by the Company,  as well as its programs  whereby  surgeons train
other surgeons in necessarybest demonstrated  techniques.  The Company also assists organ
procurement  agencies  and tissue banks  through  training  and  development  of
protocols and provides  necessary  materials to improve their internal tissue  processing
techniques and to increase efficiency and the yield of usable tissue.

Human  Heart  Valves  and   Conduits.   The  Company's  revenues  have been  primarily
derived from the  cryopreservation of human  heart  valves  and  conduits
for usecryopreserved by the Company are used in reconstructive  heart valve replacement
surgery.  CryoLife shipped approximately 41,10046,500 cryopreserved human heart valves
and conduits from 1984 through 1999.2000.  Based on CryoLife's  records of documented
implants,  management believes that the Company's success in the allograft heart
valve market is due in part to  physicians'  recognition  of the  longevity  and
natural  functionality of the Company's  cryopreserved human tissues as compared
to mechanical and porcine heart valve alternatives in certain applications.  The
Company  currently  applies  its  cryopreservation  services  to  human  aortic,
pulmonary  and mitral  heart valves for  implantation  by cardiac  surgeons.  In
addition, the Company provides cryopreserved conduit tissue which is the only source of tissue  available to surgeons who wish
to perform certain  specialized  cardiac repair procedures.  Each of these human
heart valves and conduits maintains a viable tissue structure which more closely
resembles  and performs  like the  patient's  own tissue than  non-human  tissue
alternatives.  In February 2000 the Company began processing and distributing in
the U.S.  decellularized  human heart valves processed by usingand conduits utilizing the first of
its SynerGraft technology  applications,  which involves depopulating the donor cells from the
valve to producedeveloping  depopulated
heart valves with antigen  reduction  properties and the potential for repopulationrecipient
cell repopulation.

In February of 2000 CryoLife began  processing some human allograft heart valves
using its SynerGraft  technology.  The SynerGraft technology effectively removes
cells from the heart valve leaving the collagen matrix intact.  The CryoValve(R)
SG valve is especially  designed to benefit patients,  both children and adults,
who have had a minor immune  response to  transplanted  tissues.  Early clinical
data indicates that the new SynerGraft  processing method mitigates the increase
of PRA (panel  reactive  antibodies)  experienced  by some of the  patients  who
receive  allograft heart valves.  The absence of an immunologic  response to the
decellularized allograft has the potential of improved long-term function of the
allograft  heart valves.  Advanced  animal studies of both allograft and porcine
heart valves that have been treated with the implant recipient'sSynerGraft  process show that these
valves have the  potential to  repopulate  themselves in vivo with the patient's
own cells.

The Company estimates that the total heart valve and conduit  replacement market
in the U.S. in 2000 was  approximately  $400 million.  Management  believes that
approximately  88,000 heart valve and conduit  surgeries  were  conducted in the
U.S.  in 2000.  Of the  total  number  of heart  valve  and  conduit  surgeries,
approximately   43,000,   or  49%,   involved   mechanical  heart  valves,   and
approximately  45,000,  or  51%,  involved  tissue  heart  valves  or  conduits,


                                       5


including porcine and  cryopreserved  human tissues.  Approximately  5,400 human
heart  valves  and  conduits  cryopreserved  by the  Company  were  shipped  for
implantation in 2000.

Management   believes   cryopreserved  human  heart  valves  and  conduits  have
characteristics  that make them the  preferred  replacement  for most  patients.
Specifically,  human heart valves,  such as those  cryopreserved by the Company,
allow for more normal blood flow and provide  higher cardiac output than porcine
and  mechanical  heart  valves.  Human heart  valves are not as  susceptible  to
progressive calcification, or hardening, as are porcine heart valves, and do not
require  anti-coagulation  drug therapy,  as do mechanical valves. The synthetic
sewing  rings  contained in  mechanical  and stented  porcine  valves aremay harbor
bacteria  leading to  endocarditis.  Furthermore,  endocarditis  is difficult to
treat with  antibiotics,  after they have  become  infected,  a  condition  whichand this usually  necessitates the surgical removal of
these  valves  at   considerable   cost,   morbidity   and  risk  of  mortality.
Consequently,  for  many  physicians,  human  heart  valves  are  the  preferred
alternative to mechanical  and stented  porcine valves for patients who have, or
are at risk to contract, endocarditis.

The following 5
table sets forth the  characteristics  of alternative  heart valve
implants  that  management  believes make  cryopreserved  human heart valves the
preferred replacement for most patients:
Porcine ----------------------------------- Cryopreserved Bovine Cryopreserved --------------------------------Human Stented Stentless(1) Mechanical Pericardium Human----------------- ------------------ ------------------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------- Stented Stentless(1) --------------- --------------- Materials: human glutaraldehyde- glutaraldehyde-glutaraldehyde glutaraldehyde pyrolitic carbon glutaraldehyde-glutaraldehyde tissue fixed pig tissue fixed pig bi-tissue bi-leaflet and fixed cow tissue and tissue leaflet and tissue synthetic sewing synthetic and synthetic and synthetic sewing ring sewing ring sewing ring Blood Flow Dynamics:Dynamics normal moderate nearly normal high elevation high elevation elevation (Required Pressure): (2) (0-5) (10-20)elevation (5-15) (10-25) (10-30) Mode of Failure: gradual gradual expected to be catastrophic gradual gradual Longevity: 20 years 7-1015-20 10-15 years expected to 2015-20 years 10-15 years years exceed stented porcine valves Increased Risk of Bleeding no occasional occasional yes occasional or Thromboembolic Events (strokes or other no occasional expected to be yes occasional clotting): rare Anti-Coagulation Drug Therapy Required: none short-term short-term chronic short-term Therapy Required: Responsiveness to Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis: high low low low low Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis: Average Valve Cost in U.S.: $7,000 $4,228$6,900 $4,500 $5,500 $4,100(3) $4,500 U.S.:
(1) Limited long-term clinical data is available since stentless porcine heart valves only recently became commercially available. (2) Pressure measured in mm/Hg. (3) Mechanical valves also require chronic anti-coagulation drug therapy at a cost of approximately $450 per year. While the clinical benefits of cryopreserved human heart valves discussed above are relevant to all patients, they are particularly important for (i) pediatric patients (newborn to 1417 years) who are prone to calcification of porcine tissue, (ii) young or otherwise active patients who face an increased risk of severe blood loss or even death due to side effects associated with the anti-coagulation drug therapy required with mechanical valves and (iii) women in their childbearing years for whom anti-coagulation drug therapy would interfere with normal pregnancy.is contraindicated. Human Vascular Tissues. The Company cryopreserves human saphenous and superficial femoral veins and arteries for use in vascular surgeries that require small diameter conduits (3mm to 6mm), such as coronary bypass surgery and peripheral vascular reconstructions. Failure to bypass or revascularize an obstruction in such cases may result in death or the loss of a limb. The Company 6 believes it offers the only available small diameter conduit product for below-the-knee vascular reconstruction. The Company also cryopreserves aortoiliac arteries for the reconstruction andof infected abdominal synthetic grafts. The Company shipped approximately 17,60022,800 human vascular tissues from 1986 through 1999.2000, which includes 5,200 shipments in 2000. A surgeon's first choice for replacing diseased or damaged vascular tissue is generally the patient's own tissue. However, in cases of advanced vascular disease, the patient's own tissue is often unusable and the surgeon may consider using synthetic grafts or transplanted human vascular tissue. Synthetic smallSmall diameter synthetic vascular grafts are generally not availablesuitable for below-the-knee surgeries and, in other procedures,because they have a tendency to shut down due to occlusionocclude because the synthetic materials in these products attract cellular material from the blood stream which in turn closes off the vessel to normal blood flow. Cryopreserved vascular tissues tend not to occluderemain open longer and as quickly because of the presence of an endothelial cell liningsuch are used in the donor vein which remains intact following the cryopreservation process.indications where synthetics fail. The Company's cryopreserved human vascular tissues are used for coronary artery bypass surgeries, peripheral vascular reconstruction, dialysis access graft replacement, and venous valve transplantation. 6 transplantation and infected abdominal graft replacement. In 1986, the Company began a program to cryopreserve saphenous veins for use in coronary artery bypass surgeries. Although the Company's cryopreserved human tissue was used in only a small percentage of the nearly 500,000 coronary artery bypass procedures estimated to have been performed in 1999,2000, the Company believes it is the only commercially available alternative to the patient's own tissue. The Company estimates that, in 1998, approximately 20,000 coronary artery bypass surgeries using the patient's vascular tissue were performed in which human vascular tissues cryopreserved by the Company could have been used. In 1989, the Company began a program to cryopreserve long segment saphenous veins for use in peripheral vascular reconstruction. In cases of peripheral arteriosclerosis, a cryopreserved saphenous vein can be implanted as a bypass graft for the diseased artery in order to improve blood flow and maintain a functional limb. Analysis of clinicalthe Company's data on file of approximately 425 implants has shown that approximately 80% of patients receiving CryoLife's preserved vascular tissues in this type of surgical procedure still have the use of the affected leg threefour years after surgery. The only alternative for many of these patients was amputation. The Company estimates that, in 2000, approximately 130,000 peripheral vascular reconstruction surgeries were performed in which its cryopreserved human vascular tissues could have been used. In 1996, the Company began a program for the cryopreservation of human superficial femoral veins for use in dialysis access graft replacement as an alternative for synthetic grafts which have a higher risk of infection than human tissue. In 1997, theThe Company began a program for the cryopreservation of human superficial femoral veins for venous valve transplant. The cryopreservation of these human tissues is designed for patients suffering from chronic venous insufficiency, a conditionestimates that, in 2000, approximately 30,000 dialysis access graft replacements were performed in which the blood flow returning to the heart from the legs is compromised due to absent, improperly functioning or destroyed venous valves. Prior to the introduction of CryoLife'sits cryopreserved venous valves, treatment for patients suffering from this ailment generally was limited to drug therapy or compression stockings.human vascular tissues could have been used. Human Connective Tissue for the Knee. The Company provides cryopreservedcryopreservation services for surgical replacements for the meniscus and the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, which are connective tissues critical to the proper operation of the human knee, as well as osteochondral grafts used for the repair of cartilage defects in the knee. CryoLife has shipped approximately 11,30016,600 human connective tissues for the knee through 1999.2000, which includes 5,300 shipments in 2000. Human menisci cryopreserved by the Company provide orthopaedic surgeons with an alternative treatment in cases where a patient's meniscus has been completely removed. When a patient has a damaged meniscus, the current surgical alternatives are to repair, partially remove or completely remove the patient's meniscus, with partial removal being the most common procedure. Meniscal removal increases the risk of premature knee degeneration and arthritis and typically results in the need for knee replacement surgery at some point during the patient's life. Management believes that the Company is the only provider of cryopreserved meniscal tissue and that there are no synthetic menisci on the market. The Company estimates that in 2000 in the U.S. approximately 700,000 patients underwent partial or total meniscectomies. The Company believes up to 30% of these patients could become candidates for meniscal replacement within five years. Tendons cryopreserved by the Company are used for the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligaments in cases where the patient's ligaments are irreparably damaged. Surgeons have traditionally removed a portion of the patient's patellar tendon from the patient's undamaged knee for use in repairing a damaged anterior cruciate ligament. Tendons cryopreserved by the Company provide an alternative 7 to this procedure. Because surgeries using cryopreserved tissue do not involve the removal of any of the patient's own patellar tendon, the patient recovery period is typically shorter. The Company estimates that in 2000 approximately 175,000 cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries were performed. Other Allograft Tissues UnderTissue Research and Development. The Company hasis engaged in research and development on other projects for the use of cryopreserved human endothelial cells, peripheral nerves and spinal discs,other connective tissues, in various surgical applications. Bioprosthetic Cardiovascular Devices The Company is developing bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices based on its experience with cryopreserved human tissue implants. Like human heart valves, the Company's porcine heart valves are stentless with the valve opening, or annulus, retaining a more natural flexibility. Stented porcine and mechanical heart valves are typically fitted with synthetic sewing rings which are rigid and can impede normal blood flow. Unlike most other available porcine heart valves, the Company's stentless porcine heart valves do not contain synthetic materials which increase the risk of endocarditis, a debilitating and potentially deadly bacterial infection. 7 Fixed porcine heart valves are often preferred by surgeons for procedures involving elderly patients because they eliminate the risk of patient non-compliance with anti-coagulation drug therapy associated with mechanical valves, are less expensive than allograft valves and their shorter longevity is more appropriately matched with these patients' life expectancies. The Company's SynerGraft technology applies to its porcine heart valves and involves the removal of living cells from the structure of non-viable animal tissue to allow the potential repopulation of such tissue with the implant recipient's own cells. In animal studies, porcine valves that were depopulated by the SynerGraft process were repopulated with cells from the valve recipient. This process is designed to reduce calcification of porcine heart valves, thereby increasing their longevity, and more generally to improve the biocompatibility and functionality of such tissue. The Company believes that its porcine heart valves, when treated with SynerGraft technology, will expand its opportunity to address the broader international and U.S. heart valve markets. Potential future SynerGraft technology applications may involve developing stentless porcine heart valves repopulated with viable human cells prior to implantation. This technology will use porcine tissues that have been depopulated of viable animal cells using the SynerGraft process. The following table sets forth the bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices currently marketed by the Company, along with the product features and market status for each.
Fixed Stentless Porcine Valves Features Regulatory/Market Status ------------------------------ ------------ ------------------------- CryoLife-O'Brien aortic valve of matched currently marketed in Europe with composite leaflet design; regulatory approval under CE Mark single suture line CryoLife-Ross pulmonary valve with currently marketed in Europe with attached conduit regulatory approval under CE Mark
The CryoLife-O'Brien aortic valve is a stentless porcine valve with design features which management believes provide significant advantages over other stentless porcine heart valves. CryoLife began exclusive worldwide distribution of this valve in 1992 and acquired all rights to the underlying technology in 1995. The Company's CryoLife-O'Brien aortic heart valve, currently marketed in the European Community and certain other territories outside the U.S., contains a matched composite leaflet design that approximates human heart valve blood flow characteristics and requires only a single suture line thereby simplifying surgical implantation. Most other stentless porcine valves require a more complicated implant procedure. The CryoLife-Ross pulmonary valve, the patent for which the Company acquired in October 1996, is an advanced design stentless porcine heart valve within an attached conduit of porcine tissue, which mimics the structure of a human heart valve. The Company began manufacturing and distributing the Cryolife-Ross pulmonary heart valve, another of the Company's fixed stentless porcine valves, in the European Community in September 1998. The Company plans to apply its proprietary SynerGraft technology to stentless porcine heart valves. The first of the SynerGraft technology applications involves developing depopulated stentless porcine heart valves with antigen reduction properties. This technology removes viable cells from animal tissues, thereby reducing the transplant recipient's immune response to the remaining depopulated tissues. The auto-immune response typically deposits calcium which attaches to and hardens implanted porcine heart valve tissue, a process known as calcification, which reduces the useful life of the implant. By removing viable animal cells from the tissue while maintaining the underlying structural strength of the porcine heart valve, this SynerGraft application is designed to provide a platform for a patient's own cells with the potential to naturally populate the implant. 8 The second of the SynerGraft technology applications involves an attempt to develop stentless porcine heart valves repopulated with viable human cells prior to implantation. This technology uses porcine tissues that have been depopulated of viable animal cells using the SynerGraft process. Implantable Biomaterials for Use as Surgical Adhesives and Sealants The effective closure of internal wounds following surgical procedures is critical to the restoration of the function of tissue and to the ultimate success of the surgical procedure. Failure to effectively seal surgical wounds can result in leakage of air in lung surgeries, cerebral spinal fluids in neurosurgeries, blood in cardiovascular surgeries and gastrointestinal contents in abdominal surgeries. Air and fluid leaks resulting from surgical procedures can lead to significant post-surgicalpost-operative morbidity resulting in prolonged hospitalization, higher levels of post-operative pain and a higher mortality rate. Sutures and staples facilitate healing by joining wound edges and allowing the body to heal naturally. However, because sutures and staples do not have inherent sealing capabilities, they cannot consistently eliminate air and fluid leakage at the wound site. This is particularly the case when sutures and staples are used to close tissues containing air or fluids under pressure, such as the lobes of the lung, the dural membrane surrounding the brain and spinal cord, blood vessels and the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, in minimally invasive surgical procedures, where the physician must operate through small access devices, it can be difficult and time consuming for the physician to apply sutures and staples. The Company believes that the use of surgical adhesives and sealants with or without sutures and staples could enhance the efficacy of these procedures through more effective and rapid wound closure. In order to address the inherent limitations of sutures and staples, the Company has developed and begun commercializing its BioGlue surgical adhesive and is developing its FibRx surgical sealant.adhesive. The BioGlue surgical adhesive is a polymeric surgical bioadhesive based on a derivative of aan animal blood protein and a cross-linking agent. BioGlue surgical adhesive is nonbiodegradable and has a tensile strength that is four to five times that of FibRx surgical sealant.fibrin sealants. Clinical applications for BioGlue surgical adhesive include cardiovascular, vascular and pulmonary repair. Other potential applications for BioGlue surgical adhesive include neurosurgery, orthopaedic indications, general surgery and as a replacement for spinal discs. A derivative of the BioGlue technology is BioLastic(TM), an implantable biomaterial under development which is capable of exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide. BioLastic is being developed for use in reinforcing or patching vascular tissue, repairing air leaks in lungs, and replacing or sealing holes in dura mater. FibRx surgical sealant is a light activated surgical sealant based on a derivative of the human blood factors fibrinogen and thrombin. The Company believes that FibRx is the only surgical sealant under development offering ease of use to the surgeon through either single-syringe or spray applicators. The Company is currently seeking funding for FibRx and other photo-activated reversible inhibitors through AuraZyme, its wholly owned subsidiary. In March 2000, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement with Viragen, Inc. to conduct a project to research the feasibility of site-specifc delivery and activation of Viragen's anti-cancer proteins using the Company's light activation technology. The following table summarizes certain important features, targeted applications and regulatory and market status of BioGlue surgical adhesive and FibRx surgical sealant:
BioGlue Surgical Adhesive FibRx Surgical Sealant ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- Composition: animal albumin and glutaraldehyde thrombin, fibrinogen and a thrombin inhibitor Method of Application: double syringe; mixing device light activated single syringe; or provided light activated spray applicator Targeted Clinical vascular repair; anastomotic hemostasis in cardiovascular Applications: sealing; aortic procedures; modified tPA, drug delivery dissection repair; carotid endarterectomy patching; tissue bonding; pulmonary repair Performance high tensile strength; strength of normal human blood clot; Characteristics: non-biodegradable biodegradable; flexible, easily manipulated Regulatory/Market Status Europe, Canada and Approved for cardiovascular, regulatory pathway to be determined certain other vascular and pulmonary repair pending AuraZyme funding countries: applications United States: FDA approved as a Humanitarian Use regulatory pathway to be determined Device for use as an adjunct in pending AuraZyme funding repair of acute thoracic aortic dissections; clinical trials for general vascular and selected cardiac repairs will begin in second quarter of 2000
9 The Company estimates that the worldwide market for surgical sutures and staples in 19992000 was in excess of $2 billion. The Company began shipping BioGlue surgical adhesive for distribution in the European CommunityEC in the second quarter of 1998 for use in vascular applications and in the U.S.first quarter of 1999 for use in pulmonary applications. In December 1999 the Company began shipping BioGlue surgical adhesive in the U.S. pursuant to an HDE for use as an adjunct in repair of acute thoracic aortic dissections. Bioprosthetic Cardiovascular Devices The regulatory pathwayCompany is developing bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices based on its experience with cryopreserved human tissue implants. Like human heart valves, the Company's porcine heart valves are stentless with the valve opening, or annulus, retaining a more natural flexibility. Stented porcine and mechanical heart valves are typically fitted with synthetic sewing rings which are rigid and can impede normal blood flow. Unlike most other available porcine heart valves, the Company's stentless porcine heart valves do not contain synthetic materials which increase the risk of endocarditis, a debilitating and potentially deadly infection. Glutaraldehyde fixed porcine heart valves are often preferred by surgeons for FibRxprocedures involving elderly patients because they eliminate the risk of patient non-compliance with anti-coagulation drug therapy associated with mechanical valves, they are less expensive than allograft valves and their shorter 8 longevity is more appropriately matched with these patients' life expectancies. Glutaraldehyde fixed porcine and bovine heart valves address a worldwide target market estimated to have been $325 million in 2000. The Company's SynerGraft technology involves the removal of cells from the structure of non-viable animal tissue, leaving a collagen matrix that has the potential to repopulate in vivo with the recipient's own cells. This process is designed to reduce calcification of porcine heart valves, thereby increasing their longevity, and more generally to improve the biocompatibility and functionality of such tissue. The Company believes that its porcine heart valves, when treated with SynerGraft technology, will expand its opportunity to address the broader international and U.S. heart valve markets, estimated to have been $390 million and $400 million, respectively, in 2000. Potential future SynerGraft technology applications involve developing stentless porcine heart valves repopulated in vitro with viable human cells prior to implantation. The following table sets forth the bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices currently marketed by the Company, along with the product features and market status for each.
Fixed Stentless Porcine Valves Features Regulatory/Market Status ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------- SynerGraft depopulated aortic pulmonary valve currently marketed in Europe with of composite leaflet design; no regulatory approval under CE Mark synthetic material; normal hemodynamics CryoLife-O'Brien aortic valve of matched composite currently marketed in Europe with leaflet design; single suture line regulatory approval under CE Mark; implantation technique; no currently marketed in Canada with synthetic material; normal regulatory approval under Therapeutic hemodynamics Products Programme CryoLife-Ross pulmonary valve with attached currently marketed in Europe with conduit; no synthetic material; regulatory approval under CE Mark normal hemodynamics
The SynerGraft heart valve is a depopulated stentless porcine heart valve with antigen reduction properties. CryoLife obtained a CE Mark for the SynerGraft heart valve in November 2000. This technology removes cells from animal tissues, thereby reducing the transplant recipient's immune response to the implanted tissue. Typically calcium is deposited through an immune response, which reduces the useful life of the implant. By removing animal cells from the tissue while maintaining the underlying structural strength of the porcine heart valve, this SynerGraft application is designed to provide a platform for a patient's own cells to potentially repopulate the implant. The CryoLife-O'Brien aortic valve is a stentless porcine valve with design features which management believes provide significant advantages over other stentless porcine heart valves. CryoLife began exclusive worldwide distribution of this valve in 1992 and acquired all rights to the underlying technology in 1995. The Company's CryoLife-O'Brien aortic heart valve, currently marketed in the EC and certain other territories outside the U.S., contains a matched composite leaflet design that approximates human heart valve blood flow characteristics and requires only a single suture line thereby simplifying surgical sealant will be determined uponimplantation. Most other stentless porcine valves require a more complicated implant procedure. The CryoLife-Ross pulmonary valve, the fundingpatent for which the Company acquired in October 1996, is an advanced design stentless porcine heart valve within an attached conduit of Aurazyme.porcine tissue, which mimics the structure of a human heart valve. The Company began manufacturing and distributing the CryoLife-Ross pulmonary heart valve, in the EC in September 1998. 9 Single-Use Medical Devices TheOn October 9, 2000 the Company serves as an OEM manufacturer, through its IFM subsidiary,sold substantially all of single-use medical devices including endarterectomy surgical instruments, intravascular shunts, infusion ports, accessories utilized in laparoscopic procedures and a wide rangethe remaining assets of single and dual lumen balloon catheters. The Company is benefiting from, and intendsIdeas for Medicine, Inc. ("IFM") to utilize, its design and manufacturing expertise in developing single-use medical devices for use in conjunction with its human tissue and biomaterial products. An example of such a single-use medical device under development includes families of balloon catheters and applicator tips designed to assist in applying the BioGlue surgical adhesive. HMP has defaulted on its OEM manufacturing agreement with IFM.Horizon Medical Products, Inc. See Item 7: "Management's DiscussionsDiscussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.for a more detailed discussion. Sales, Distribution and Marketing Cryopreservation Services CryoLife markets its cryopreservation services to tissue procurement agencies, implanting physicians and prospective tissue recipients. The Company works with tissue banks and organ procurement agencies to ensure consistent and continued availability of donated human tissue for transplant and educates physicians and prospective tissue recipients with respect to the benefits of cryopreserved human tissues. Procurement of Tissue. Donated human tissue is procured from deceased human donors by organ procurement agencies and tissue banks and subject to required testing and donor screening procedures.banks. After procurement, the tissue is packed and shipped, together with certain information about the tissue and its donor, to the Company in accordance with the Company's protocols. The tissue is transported to the Company's laboratory facilities via commercial airlines pursuant to arrangements with qualified courier services. Timely receipt of procured tissue is important, as tissue that is not received promptly cannot be cryopreserved successfully. The procurement agency receives a fee for its services, which is paidreimbursed by the Company.Company, for the costs associated with these procurement services. The procurement fee and related shipping costs, together with the charges for the cryopreservation services of the Company, are ultimately reimbursedpaid to the Company by the hospital with which the implanting physician is associated. The Company has developed relationships with over 250100 tissue banks and organ procurement agencies throughout the U.S. Management believes the establishment of these relationships is critical for a growing business in the cryopreservation services industry and that the breadth of these existing relationships provides the Company a significant advantage over potential new entrants to this market. As a result of its maintaining and developing these relationships, the Company has consistently increased its annual human heart valve procurement since its inception. The Company employs approximately 1814 individuals in the area ofto work with organ procurement agencies and tissue procurement, fivebanks, six of whom are employed as procurement relations managers and are stationed throughout the country. The Company's central office for procurement officerelations is staffed 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Preservation of Tissue. Upon receiving tissue, a Company technician completes the documentation control for the tissue prepared by the procurement agency and gives it a control number. The documentation identifies, among other things, donor age and cause of death. A trained technician then removes the portion or portions of the delivered tissue that will be cryopreserved. These procedures are conducted under aseptic conditions in clean rooms. At the same time, additional samples are taken from the donated tissue and subjected to the 10 Company's comprehensive quality assurance program that includes review of donor screening information and further testing of the tissue to determine if it is free of infectuous diseases.program. This program may identify characteristics which would disqualify the tissue for cryopreservation. Human heart valves and conduits, vascular tissue and connective tissue for the knee are cryopreserved in a proprietary freezing process conducted according to strict Company protocols. After the cryopreservation process, the specimens are transferred to liquid nitrogen freezers for long-term storage at temperatures below -135(Degree)C. The entire cryopreservation process is rigidly controlled by guidelines established by the Company. The tissue is not released for distribution until all quality assurance procedures have been satisfied and the tissue has been determined to be suitable for transplant. Distribution of Tissue to Implanting Physicians. After cryopreservation, tissue is stored by the Company or is delivered directly to hospitals at the implanting physician's request. Cryopreserved tissue must be transported under stringent handling conditions and maintained within specific temperature tolerances at all times. Cryopreserved tissue is packaged for shipment using the Company's proprietary processes. At the hospital, the tissue is held in a liquid nitrogen freezer according to Company protocols pending implantation. The Company provides a detailed protocol for thawing the cryopreserved tissue. The Company also makes its technical personnel available by phone or in person to answer questions. After the Company transports the tissue to the hospital, the Company invoices the institution for its services, the procurement fee and transportation costs. 10 The Company encourages hospitals to accept the cryopreserved tissue quickly by providingprovides Company-owned liquid nitrogen freezers to client hospitals without charge. The Company has currently installed more than 300 of these freezers. Participating hospitals pay the cost of liquid nitrogen and regular maintenance. The availability of on-site freezers makes it easier for a hospital's physicians to utilize the Company's cryopreservation services by making the cryopreserved tissue more readily available. Because fees for the Company's cryopreservation services become due upon the delivery of tissue to the hospital, the use of such on-site freezers also reduces the Company's working capital needs. Marketing, Educational and Technical Support. The Company maintains active relationships with approximately 2,000 cardiovascular, vascular and orthopaedic surgeons who have active practices implanting cryopreserved human tissues and markets to a broader group of physicians within these medical specialties. Because the Company markets its cryopreservation services directly to physicians, an important aspect of increasing the distribution of the Company's cryopreservation services is educating physicians on the use of cryopreserved human tissue and on proper implantation techniques. Trained field support personnel provide back-up and support to implanting institutions and surgeons. The Company currently has over 100150 independent technical service representatives and sub-representatives (who deal primarily with orthopaedic surgeons and who are paid on a commission basis) as well as 4145 persons employed as technical service representatives (who deal primarily with cardiovascular and vascular surgeons and receive a base salary with a performance bonus) all of whom provide field support. The Company sponsors physician training seminars where leading physicians teach other physicians the proper technique for handling and implanting cryopreserved human tissue. Physicians pay their own expenses to attend these seminars in addition to paying the Company a fee for attendance. The Company also produces educational videotapes for physicians. The Company coordinates live surgery demonstrations at various medical schools. The Company also coordinates laboratory sessions that utilize animal tissue to demonstrate the respective surgical techniques. Members of the Company's Medical Advisory Board often lead the surgery demonstrations and laboratory sessions. Management believes that these activities improve the medical community's acceptance of the cryopreserved human tissue processed by the Company. In order to increase the Company's supply of humanTo assist procurement agencies and tissue for cryopreservation,banks, the Company educatesprovides educational materials and trains procurement agency personnel intraining on procurement, dissection, packaging and shipping techniques. The Company also produces educational videotapes and coordinates laboratory sessions on procurement techniques for procurement agency personnel. To supplement its educational activities, the Company employs in-house technical specialists that provide technical information and assistance and maintains a staff 24 hours per day, 365 days per year for customer support. 11 Bioprosthetic Cardiovascular DevicesEuropean Distribution In September 1999 the Company established its European subsidiary, CryoLife Europa Ltd ("Europa"), to provide distribution and technical services to the Company's network of European representatives, institutional customers and surgeons. In February 2000 Europa officially opened its headquarters located near London, England. The Company markets the CryoLife-O'Brien and CryoLife-Ross stentless porcine heart valves in the European Community and Australia. The Company's European sales, distribution and marketing force consists of 21 independent representatives, representing each of the Benelux countries, France, Germany, Greece, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden, Italy, Turkey and the United Kingdom. Marketing efforts are directed almost exclusively toward cardiovascular and vascular surgeons, and the Company conducts educational seminars and conferences to train these surgeons and educate them with respect to the uses and benefits of its porcine stentless heart valves. BioGlue Surgical Adhesive The Company markets and distributes its BioGlue surgical adhesive in the U.S. under the HDE for use in the repair of acute thoracic aortic dissections through its existing direct technical representatives. The Company markets and distributes its BioGlue surgical adhesive in the European Community through Europa and its existing independent representatives, and in other international markets, excluding Japan, through itsEuropa and other existing independent representatives. The Company's European, Middle East and African sales, marketing and distribution activities directed through Europa are channeled through 26 independent distributors located in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Latvia, Benelux, Switzerland, Austria, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Solvenia, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Turkey, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Kuwait, UAE and South Africa. Marketing efforts are directed almost exclusively toward cardiovascular, vascular and thoracic surgeons, and the Company conducts training sessions for doctors with respect to the application and administration of BioGlue surgical adhesive. During 1998, the Company signed a five-year exclusive agreement with Century Medical, Inc. for the introduction and distribution of BioGlue in Japan. Under the terms of the agreement, Century Medical will be responsible for the applications and clearances throughwith the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare. 11 Bioprosthetic Cardiovascular Devices The Company markets the CryoLife-O'Brien and CryoLife-Ross stentless porcine heart valves in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The CryoLife-O'Brien valve is marketed in Canada. The Company commenced marketing the SynerGraft heart valve in Europe during the fourth quarter of 2000. Marketing efforts are primarily directed almost exclusively toward cardiovascular,cardiac, cardio-thoracic and vascular and thoracic surgeons and the Company conducts training sessions for doctorseducational seminars and conferences to train these surgeons and educate them with respect to the applicationuses and administration of BioGlue surgical adhesive. Single-Use Medical Devices The Company serves as an OEM manufacturer for single-use medical devices for Horizon Medical Products, Inc. The Company plans to expand salesbenefits of its own single-use medical devices, which include BioGlue extender tips and aortic balloon catheters, by continuing new product development and leveraging its established cryopreservation services and product marketing and sales staff to market the products.porcine stentless heart valves. Research and Development The Company uses its expertise in immunology, biochemistry and cell biology, and its understanding of the needs of the cardiovascular, vascular and orthopaedic surgery medical specialties, to continue to expand its core cryopreservation business in the U.S. and to develop or acquire implantable products and technologies for these fields. The Company seeks to identify market areas that can benefit from preserved living tissues and other related technologies, to develop innovative techniques and products within these areas, to secure their commercial protection, to establish their efficacy and then to market these techniques and products. The Company employs approximately 22 people in its research and development department. There are 10department, including seven PhDs with specialties in the fields of immunology, molecular biology, protein chemistry, organic chemistry and vascular biology. In order to expand the Company's service and product offerings, the Company is currently in the process of developing or investigating several technologies and products, including FibRx surgical sealant, additional applications of the SynerGraft technology and additional applications of BioGlue surgical adhesive.adhesive, as well as its ACT technology. The Company is currently investigating certain drug delivery applications for BioGlue surgical adhesive and FibRx surgical sealant,its ACT technology, such as administering antibiotics, attaching chemotherapy drugs to tumors, delivering growth agents or delivering bone chipsmaterial for orthopaedic bone repair. To the extent the Company identifies additional applications for these products, the Company may attempt to license these products to corporate partners for further development of such applications or seek funding from outside sources to continue the commercial develomentdevelopment of such technologies. The Company's research and development strategy is to allocate available resources among the Company's four core market areas of 12 cryopreservation services, bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices and implantable biomaterials, and single-use medical devices, based on the size of the potential market for any specific product candidate and the estimated development time and cost required to bring the product to market. Research on these and other projects is conducted in the Company's research and development laboratory or at universities or clinics where the Company sponsors research projects. In 1997, 1998, 1999 and 1999,2000, the Company spent approximately $3.9 million, $4.7 million, $4.4 million and $4.4$5.2 million, respectively, on research and development activities on new and existing products. These amounts represented approximately 8%, 8%7% and 7% of the Company's revenues for those respective years. The Company's research and development program is overseen by its medical and scientific advisory boards. The Company's pre-clinical studies are conducted at universities and other locations outside the Company's facilities by third parties under contract with the Company. In addition to these efforts, the Company may, as situations develop, pursue other research and development activities. Manufacturing and Operations The Company's facilities (other than its single-use medical device manufacturing plant) are located in suburban Atlanta, Georgia, and consist of three separate locations totaling approximately 130,000 square feet of leased office, laboratory and warehouse space. In February 2000 the Company began construction of a 100,000 square foot expansion of its corporate headquarters and manufacturing facilities. Approximately 17,500 square feet are dedicated to laboratory work areas. The primary facility, which does not include the FibRxbiomedical products laboratory and the bioprosthetic manufacturing operation, has four main laboratory facilities: human tissue processing, BioGlue manufacturing, research and development and microbiology. Each of these areas consists of a general technician work area and adjoining "clean rooms" for work with human tissue or BioglueBioGlue manufacturing, and for aseptic processing. The clean rooms are supplied with highly filtered air which provides a near-sterile environment. In February 2000 the Company began construction of a 100,000 square foot expansion of its corporate headquarters and manufacturing facilities, which is expected to be fully completed and occupied in the fourth quarter of 2001. 12 Human Tissue Processing The human tissue processing laboratory is responsible for the processing and cryopreservation of human tissue for transplant, including the processing of SynerGraft treated human heart valves and conduits processed by applying SyneGraft technology.and certain vascular tissues. This includes all processing of heart valves and conduits, vascular tissue and connective tissue for the knee supplied by CryoLife. This laboratory contains approximately 7,700 square feet with a suite of seven clean rooms. Currently there are 5358 technicians employed in this area, and the laboratory is staffed for two shifts, 365 days per year. In 1999,2000 the laboratory processed approximately 27,30017,200 human tissues for distribution and transplant. The current staffing level is estimated to be at about half of total capacity. Increasing this capacity could be accomplished by increasing employees and expanding to three shifts. Implantable Biomaterials for Use as Surgical Adhesives and Sealants BioGlue surgical adhesive is presently manufactured at the Company's headquarters facility, which has an annual capacity of approximately 300,000 units. This laboratory contains approximately 12,90014,500 square feet, including a suite of 2four cleanrooms. Currently, there are six technicians employed in this area. The Company conducts research on its FibRx surgical sealantACT technology in the biomedical products laboratory, which is located in Marietta, Georgia, and employs 2two technicians. This laboratory contains approximately 11,000 square feet, including 4,000 square feet of laboratory space and a suite of eight clean rooms. Bioprosthetic Cardiovascular Devices The bioprosthesis laboratory is responsible for the manufacturing of the CryoLife-O'Brien and CryoLife-Ross stentless porcine heart valves, as well as for the manufacturing of SynerGraft porcine valves. This laboratory is located in Marietta, Georgia and contains approximately 13,00020,500 square feet, with about 3,5002,100 square feet of laboratory space and a suite of foursix clean rooms for tissue processing. Currently, this laboratory employs 2536 technicians and is scheduled to manufacture approximately 1,2001,600 CryoLife-O'Brien, CryoLife-Ross and CryoLife-RossSynerGraft valves in 2000. The recently renovated facility's capacity is over 6,000 valves. 13 Single-Use Medical Devices The manufacturing of single-use medical devices is conducted at the Company's IFM subsidiary located in St. Petersburg, Florida. IFM moved to a renovated 30,000 square foot facility in January 1998. The Company has approximately 105 employees at this facility. In the new facility, a single shift can produce approximately 300,000 units annually with full capacity expected to be nearly 800,000 units annually.2001. Quality Assurance The Company's operations encompass the provision of cryopreservation services and the manufacturing of bioprosthetics bioadhesives and single-use medical devices.bioadhesives. In all of its facilities, the Company is subject to regulatory standards for good manufacturing practices, including current Quality System Regulations, which are U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA")FDA regulatory requirements for medical device manufacturers. The FDA periodically inspects Company facilities to ensure Company compliance with these regulations. The Company also operates according to ISO 9001 Quality System Requirements, an internationally recognized voluntary system of quality management for companies that design, develop, manufacture, distribute and service products. The Company maintains a Certification of Approval to the ISO 9001, as well as EN46001 and ANSI/ISO/ASQC/Q9001, the European and U.S. versions of the international standard, respectively. This approval is issued by Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Limited ("LRQA"). LRQA is a Notified Body officially recognized by the European CommunityEC to perform assessments of compliance with ISO 9001 and its derivative standards. LRQA performs semi-annual on-site inspections of the Company's quality systems. The Company's quality assurance staff is comprised primarily of experienced professionals from the medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturing industries. The quality assurance department, in conjunction with the Company's research and development and select university research staffs, routinely evaluates the Company's processes and procedures. 13 Cryopreservation Services The Company employs a comprehensive quality assurance program in all of its tissue processing activities. The Company is subject to Quality System Regulations, additional FDA regulations and ISO 9001. The Company's quality assurance program begins with the development and implementation of training courses for the employees of procurement agencies. To assure uniformity of procurement practices among the tissue recovery teams, the Company provides procurement protocols, transport packages and tissue transport liquids to the donor sites. Upon receipt by the Company, each tissue is assigned a unique control number that provides traceability of tissue from procurement through the processing and preservation processes, and ultimately to the tissue recipient. Blood samples from each tissue donor are subjected to a variety of tests to screen for infectious diseases. Samples of certain tissues are also sent to independent laboratories for pathology testing. Following dissection of the tissue to be cryopreserved, a separate disinfection procedure is begun during which the dissected tissue is treated with proprietary antibiotic solutions. A trained technician then removes samples from the disinfected tissue upon which serial cultures are performed to identify bacterial or fungal growth. The materials and solutions used by the Company in processing tissue are pre-screened to determine if they are of desired quality as defined by Company protocols. Only materials and solutions that meet the Company's requirements are approved by quality assurance personnel for use in processing. Throughout tissue processing, detailed records are maintained and reviewed by quality assurance personnel. The Company's tissue processing facilities are annually licensed by the States of Georgia, New York, Florida and California as facilities that process, store and distribute human tissue for implantation. The regulatory bodies of these states perform appropriate inspections of the facilities to ensure compliance with state law and regulations. In addition, the Company's human heart valve processing operations are additionally regulated by the FDA and periodically inspected for compliance withto Quality System Regulations. Other human tissue processed by the Company is periodically inspected for compliance with the Code of Federal Regulation ("CFR") Part 1270. CFR 1270 is an FDA regulation which sets forth the requirements with which the Company must comply in determining the suitability of human tissue for implantation. 14 Bioprosthetic Bioadhesive and Single-Use Medical DeviceBioadhesive Manufacturing The Company employs a comprehensive quality assurance program in all of its manufacturing activities. The Company is subject to Quality System Regulations, additional FDA regulations and ISO 9001. All materials and components utilized in the production of the Company's products are received and thoroughly inspected by trained quality control personnel, according to written specifications and standard operating procedures. Only materials and components found to comply with Company procedures are accepted by quality control and utilized in production. All materials, components and resulting sub-assemblies are traced throughout the manufacturing process to assure that appropriate corrective actions can be implemented if necessary. Each process is documented along with all inspection results, including final finished product inspection and acceptance. Records are maintained as to the consignee of product to facilitate product removals or corrections, if necessary. All processes in manufacturing are validated by quality engineers to assure that they are capable of consistently producing product meeting specifications. The Company maintains a rigorous quality assurance program of measuring devices used for manufacturing and inspection to ensure appropriate accuracy and precision. Each manufacturing facility is subject to periodic inspection by the FDA and LRQA to independently assure the Company's compliance with its systems and regulatory requirements. 14 Patents, Licenses and Other Proprietary Rights The Company relies on a combination of patents, trade secrets, trademarks and confidentiality agreements to protect its proprietary products, processing technology rights and know-how. The Company believes that its patents, trade secrets, trademarks and technology licensing rights provide it with important competitive advantages. The Company owns or has licensed rights to 3035 U.S. patents and 2633 foreign patents, including patents relating to its technology for human heart valve and conduit, vascular tissue and connective tissue for the knee preservation; tissue revitalization prior to freezing; tissue transport; fibrinBioGlue surgical adhesive; ACT; organ storage solution; and packaging. Certain of the above patents relate to the Company's BioGlue surgical adhesive and FibRx surgical sealant. The Company has 1520 pending U.S. patent applications and in excess of 4378 pending foreign applications that relate to areas including heart valve and tissue processing technology and delivery of bioadhesives for anastomosis and other uses. In connection with the sale of the IFM product line to Horizon in 1998, the Company sold all patents related to such product line. There can be no assurance that any patents pending will result in issued patents. The Company also has exclusive licensing rights for technology relating to light-sensitive enzyme inhibitors. The remaining duration of the Company's issued patents ranges from 23 to 17 years. The Company has licensed from third parties certain technologies used in the development of its FibRx surgical sealantACT technology and SynerGraft technology. These licenses call for the payment of both development milestones and royalties based on product sales, when and if such products are approved for marketing. The loss of these licenses could adversely affect the Company's ability to successfully develop its FibRx surgical sealantACT and SynerGraft technologies. There can be no assurance that the claims allowed in any of the Company's existing or future patents will provide competitive advantages for the Company's products, processes and technologies or will not be successfully challenged or circumvented by competitors. To the extent that any of the Company's products are not patent protected, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Under current law, patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy until patents are issued and patent applications in foreign countries are maintained in secrecy for a period after filing. The right to a patent in the U.S. is attributable to the first to invent, not the first to file a patent application. The Company cannot be sure that its products or technologies do not infringe patents that 15 may be granted in the future pursuant to pending patent applications or that its products do not infringe any patents or proprietary rights of third parties. The Company may incur substantial legal fees in defending against a patent infringement claim or in asserting claims against third parties. In the event that any relevant claims of third-party patents are upheld as valid and enforceable, the Company could be prevented from selling certain of its products or could be required to obtain licenses from the owners of such patents or be required to redesign its products to avoid infringement. There can be no assurance that such licenses would be available or, if available, would be on terms acceptable to the Company or that the Company would be successful in any attempt to redesign its products or processes to avoid infringement. The Company's failure to obtain these licenses or to redesign its products could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company has entered into confidentiality agreements with all of its employees and several of its consultants and third-party vendors to maintain the confidentiality of trade secrets and proprietary information. There can be no assurance that the obligations of employees of the Company and third parties with whom the Company has entered into confidentiality agreements will effectively prevent disclosure of the Company's confidential information or provide meaningful protection for the Company's confidential information if there is unauthorized use or disclosure, or that the Company's trade secrets or proprietary information will not be independently developed by the Company's competitors. Litigation may be necessary to defend against claims of infringement, to enforce patents and trademarks of the Company, or to protect trade secrets and could result in substantial cost to, and diversion of effort by, the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company would prevail in any such litigation. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect the Company's proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S. 15 Competition Cryopreserved Human Tissues and Bioprosthetic Cardiovascular Devices The Company faces competition from at least one for profit company and a small number of non-profit tissue banks that cryopreserve and distribute human tissue, as well as from companies that market mechanical, porcine and bovine heart valves for implantation. Many established companies, some with resources greater than those of the Company, are engaged in manufacturing, marketing and selling alternatives to cryopreserved human tissue. Management believes that it competes favorably with other entities that cryopreserve human tissue on the basis of technology, customer service and quality assurance. As compared to mechanical, porcine and bovine heart valves, management believes that the human heart valves cryopreserved by the Company compete on the factors set forth above, as well as by providing a tissue that is the preferred replacement alternative with respect to certain medical conditions, such as pediatric cardiac reconstruction, valve replacements for women in their child-bearing years and valve replacements for patients with endocarditis. Although human tissue cryopreserved by the Company is initially higher priced than are mechanical alternatives, these alternatives typically require that the patient take anti-coagulation drug therapy for the lifetime of the implant. As a result of the costs associated with anti-coagulants, mechanical valves are generally, over the life of the implant, more expensive than tissue cryopreserved by the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, management believes that, to date, price has not been a significant competitive factor. Generally, for each procedure that may utilize other human tissue that the Company cryopreserves, there are alternative treatments. Often, as in the case of veins and ligaments, these alternatives include the repair, partial removal or complete removal of the damaged tissue and may utilize other tissues from the patients themselves or synthetic products. The selection of treatment choices is made by the attending physician in consultation with the patient. Any newly developed treatments will also compete with the use of tissue cryopreserved by the Company. Human and Stentless Porcine Heart Valves. Alternatives to human heart valves cryopreserved by the Company include mechanical valves, porcine valves and valves constructed from bovine pericardium. St. Jude Medical, Inc. is the leading supplier of mechanical heart valves, and has a marketing and distribution arrangement with a non-profit tissue bank for supplies of cryopreserved human heart valves and St. Jude Medical,valves. Edwards Life Sciences, Inc., Baxter International Inc. and Medtronics, Inc. are is the leading supplierssupplier of porcinebovine heart valves. In addition, management believes that at least three tissue banks offer cryopreservation services for human heart valves in competition with the Company. The Company 16 presently distributes its stentless porcine heart valves only outside the U.S. These stentless porcine heart valves compete with mechanical valves, human heart valves and processed bovine pericardium. The Company is aware of at least twothree other companies that offer stentless porcine heart valves. Human Vascular Tissue. Synthetic alternatives to veins cryopreserved by the Company are available primarily in medium and large diameters. Currently, management believes that there are no other providers of cryopreserved human vascular tissue in competition with the Company. Companies offering either synthetic or allograft products may enter this market in the future. Human Connective Tissue for the Knee. The Company's competition in the area of connective tissue for the knee varies according to the tissue involved. When transplant is indicated, the principal competition for human tissues cryopreserved by the Company are freeze-dried and fresh frozen human connective tissues. These alternative allografts are distributed by distributors of Osteotech, Inc. and various tissue banks, among others. Ligaments and tendons cryopreserved by the Company constitute the principal treatment options for injuries which require anterior cruciate ligament repair. To management's knowledge, there are presently no processed or synthetic alternatives to menisci cryopreserved by the Company or preserved osteochondral grafts. Implantable Biomedical Devices for Use as Surgical Adhesives and Sealants The Company competes with many domestic and foreign medical device, pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies. In the surgical adhesive and surgical sealant area, the Company will compete with existing methodologies, including traditional wound closure products such as sutures and staples, marketed by companies such as Johnson & Johnson, United States Surgical 16 Corporation, Sherwood, Davis & Geck and others. Other products currently being marketed include fibrin glue sold by Immuno AG, a subsidiary of Baxter Healthcare Company, Chemo-Sero Therapeutic Research Institute, Hoechst AG and others, and management believes other products are under development by Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, V.I. Technologies, Inc. and others. Other competitors in the surgical sealant market include Closure Medical Corporation, B. Braun GmbH, Focal, Inc., Fusion Medical Technologies Inc. and Focal,Cohesion, Inc. Competitive products may also be under development by other large medical device, pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies. Many of the Company's current and potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, regulatory and clinical, manufacturing, marketing and sales and personnel resources than the Company. These competitors may also have greater experience in developing products, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals, and manufacturing and marketing such products. Certain of these competitors may obtain patent protection, approval or clearance by the FDA or foreign countries or product commercialization earlier than the Company, any of which could materially adversely affect the Company. Furthermore, if the Company commences significant commercial sales of its products, it will also be competing with respect to manufacturing efficiency and marketing capabilities, areas in which it currently has limited experience. Other recently developed technologies or procedures are, or may in the future be, the basis of competitive products. There can be no assurance that the Company's current competitors or other parties will not succeed in developing alternative technologies and products that are more effective, easier to use or more economical than those which have been or are being developed by the Company or that would render the Company's technology and products obsolete and non-competitive in these fields. In such event, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. See "Risk Factors-RapidFactors--Rapid Technological Change." Government Regulation U.S. Federal Regulation Because human heart valves and BioGlue surgical bioadhesives are, and other Company products may be, regulated in the future as, medical devices, the Company and these products are subject to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ("FDCA") and implementing regulations. Pursuant to the FDCA, the FDA regulates the manufacture, distribution, labeling and promotion of medical devices in the U.S. In addition, various foreign countries in which the Company's products are or may be distributed impose additional regulatory requirements. 17 The FDCA provides that, unless exempted by regulation, medical devices may not be distributed in the U.S. unless they have been approved or cleared for marketing by the FDA. There are two review procedures by which medical devices can receive such approval or clearance. Some products may qualify for clearance to be marketed under a Section 510(k) ("510(k)") procedure, in which the manufacturer provides a premarket notification that it intends to begin marketing the product, and shows that the product is substantially equivalent to another legally marketed product (i.e., that it has the same intended use and that it is as safe and effective as a legally marketed device and does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness than does a legally marketed device). In some cases, the submission must include data from clinical studies. Marketing may commence when the FDA issues a clearance letter finding such substantial equivalence. If the product does not qualify for the 510(k) procedure (either because it is not substantially equivalent to a legally marketed device or because it is a Class III device required by the FDCA and implementing regulations to have an approved application for premarket approval ("PMA")),PMA, the FDA must approve a PMA application before marketing can begin. PMA applications must demonstrate, among other matters, that the medical device is safe and effective. A PMA application is typically a 17 complex submission, usually including the results of human clinical studies, and preparing an application is a detailed and time-consuming process. Once a PMA application has been submitted, the FDA's review may be lengthy and may include requests for additional data. By statute and regulation, the FDA may take 180 days to review a PMA application although such time may be extended. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that a PMA application will be reviewed within 180 days or that a PMA application will be approved by the FDA. The FDCA also provides for an investigational device exemption ("IDE") which authorizes distribution for clinical evaluation of devices that lack a PMA or 510(k). Devices subject to an IDE are subject to various restrictions imposed by the FDA. The number of patients that may be treated with the device is limited, as are the number of institutions at which the device may be used. The device may not be used until the Institutional Review Boiard for the clinical site has given its approval for the clinical study and patients have givenPatients must give informed consent to be treated with thean investigational device. The device must be labeled that it is for investigational use and may not be advertised, or otherwise promoted, and the price charged for the device may be limited. Unexpected adverse experiences must be reported to the FDA. Under certain circumstances, where human clinical studies have established the safety of a device, the FDA may grant a Humanitarian Device Exemption. HDE's are granted by the FDA in an attempt to encourage the development of medical devices for use in the treatementtreatment of rare conditions that affect small patient populations. If a device is determined to be for humanitarian use by the FDA, the manufacturer is required to show only that the device is safe and has a probable benefit to patients, but not a demonstration of safety. An approval by the FDA allowsexempts such devices to be distributed before completion offrom full compliance with clinical studies to establish the effectiveness of the device.study requirements for premarket approval. The FDCA requires all medical device manufacturers and distributors to register with the FDA annually and to provide the FDA with a list of those medical devices which they distribute commercially. The FDCA also requires manufacturers of medical devices to comply with labeling requirements and to manufacture devices in accordance with Quality System Regulations, which require that companies manufacture their products and maintain their documents in a prescribed manner with respect to good manufacturing practices, design, document production, process, labeling and packaging controls, process validation record keeping, and other quality control activities. The FDA's medical device trackingreporting regulation requires that a device manufacturer provide information to the FDA on death or serious injuries alleged to have been associated with the use of its products, as well as product malfunctions that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. The FDA's medical device tracking regulation requires the adoption of a method of device tracking by manufacturers of certain life-sustaining or implantable products, the failure of which would be reasonably likely to have serious adverse health consequences. The manufacturer must adopt methods to ensure that such devices can be traced from the manufacturing facility to the ultimate user, the patient. The FDA further requires that certain medical devices not cleared for marketing in the U.S. follow certain procedures before they are exported. 18 The FDA inspects medical device manufacturers and distributors and has authority to seize noncomplying medical devices, to enjoin and/or to impose civil penalties on manufacturers and distributors marketing non-complying medical devices, to criminally prosecute violators and to order recalls in certain instances. Human Heart Valves. The Company's human heart valves became subject to regulation by the FDA in June 1991, when the FDA published a notice stating that human heart valves arewere Class III medical devices under the FDCA. The June 1991 notice provided that distribution of human heart valves for transplantation would violate the FDCA unless they were the subject of an approved PMA or IDE on or before August 26, 1991. On October 14, 1994, the FDA announced in the Federal Register that neither an approved application for PMA nor an IDE is required for processors and distributors who had marketed heart valve allografts before June 26, 1991. This action by the FDA has resulted in the allograft heart valves being classified as Class II Medical Devices and has removed them from clinical trial status. It also allows the Company to distribute such valves to cardiovascular surgeons throughout the U.S. Other Tissue. Other than human and porcine heart valves, BioGlue and SynerGraft devices, none of the Company's other tissue services or tissue-based products are currently subject to regulation as medical devices under the FDCA or FDA regulation. Heart valves are one of a small number of processed human tissues over which the FDA has asserted medical device jurisdiction. In July 1997, the FDA published a final rule, which became effective in January 1998, regulating "human tissue." The rule clarifies and modifies an earlier interim rule and defines human tissue as any tissue derived from a human body which is (i) intended for administration to another human for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of any condition or disease and (ii) recovered, processed, stored or distributed by methods not intended to change tissue function or characteristics. The FDA definition excludes, among other 18 things, tissue that currently is regulated as a human drug, biological product or medical device and excludes kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas or any other vascularized human organ. In January 2001 the FDA published a final rule to require establishments that process or produce human tissue and cellular-based products to register with the agency and list the tissue and cellular products they process or manufacture. Human tissue is regulated by the FDA in a manner the agency has deemed necessary to protect the public health from the transmission of HIV infection and hepatitis infection through transplantation of tissue from donors with or at risk for these diseases. Unlike certain drugs, biologicals and medical devices, human tissue is not subject to premarket notification or approval by the FDA. It is likely, moreover, that the FDA will expand its regulation of processed human tissue in the future. For example, in November 2000 the FDA published a proposed rule for good tissue manufacturing practices. Moreover, the FDA may determine that the veins and connective tissue that are currently processed by the Company are medical devices, or the FDA may determine to regulate human heart valves as "human tissue" or biological products rather than medical devices, but the FDA has not done so at this time. Complying with FDA regulatory requirements or obtaining required FDA approvals or clearances may entail significant time delays and expenses or may not be possible, any of which may have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, the U.S. Congress has consideredis expected to consider legislation that would regulate human tissue for transplant or the FDA could impose a separate regulatory scheme for human tissue. Such legislation or regulation could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Porcine Heart Valves. Porcine heart valves are Class III medical devices, and FDA approval of a PMA is required prior to commercial distribution of such valves in the U.S. The porcine heart valves currently marketed by the Company have not been approved by the FDA for commercial distribution in the U.S. but may be manufactured in the U.S. and exported to foreign countries if the valves meet the specifications of the foreign purchaser, do not conflict with the laws of and are approved by the country to which they will be exported and the FDA determines that their exportation is not contrary to the public health and safety. Single-Use Medical Devices. The products manufactured by the Company through IFM are regulated as Class I and Class II medical devices by the FDA. These products require clearance under a 510(k) procedure. All products currently manufactured by IFM have received a 510(k) clearance from the FDA. In addition, the IFM facilities are subject to period inspection by the FDA, as are certain of the Company's records, including reports on returned products and problems associated with use of its products. BioGlue Surgical Adhesive. BioGlue surgical adhesive is regulated as a Class III medical device by the FDA. The Company is currently conducting clinical trials for BioGlue surgical adhesive in the U.S. There can be no assurance that BioGlue will receive FDA approval. 19 The Company received a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE)HDE in December 1999 for BioGlue surgical adhesive for use as an adjunct in repair of acute thoracic aortic dissections. The Company commercially distributes BioGlue in the USU.S. for this indication, subject to the limitations imposed by the FDA under an HDE, and will likely discontinue clinical trials of BioGlue under its current IDE.HDE. The Company has received U.S. FDA approval tocommenced and will commencecompleted enrollment of a clinical trialstrial under a supplemental IDE for BioGlue surgical adhesive for use in general vascular and selected cardiac repairs.surgery, and on February 1, 2001, the Company submitted a PMA to the FDA. If successful, the Company would be able to commercially distribute BioGlue in the USU.S. for these indications. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in gaining approval for the IDE.PMA. Possible Other FDA Regulation. Other products and processes under development by the Company are likely to be subject to regulation by the FDA (e.g., SynerGraft heart valves and FibRx surgical sealant).FDA. Some may be classified as medical devices; others may be classified as drugs or biological products or subject to a regulatory scheme for human tissue that the FDA may adopt in the future. Regulation of drugs and biological products is substantially similar to regulation of medical devices. Obtaining FDA approval to market these products is likely to be a time consuming and expensive process, and there can be no assurance that any of these products will ever receive FDA approval, if required, to be marketed. NOTA Regulation. The Company's activities in processing and transporting human hearts and certain other organs are also subject to federal regulation under the National Organ Transplant Act ("NOTA"), which makes it unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive or otherwise transfer any human organ for valuable consideration for use in human transplantation if the transfer affects interstate commerce. NOTA excludes from the definition of "valuable consideration" reasonable payments associated with the removal, transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of a human organ. The purpose of this statutory provision is to allow for compensation for legitimate services. The Company believes that to the extent its activities are subject to NOTA, it meets this statutory provision relating to the reasonableness of its charges. There can be no assurance, however, that restrictive interpretations of NOTA will not be adopted in the future that would call into question one or more aspects of the Company's methods of charging for its preservation services. 19 State Licensing Requirements Some states have enacted statutes and regulations governing the processing, transportation and storage of human organs and tissue. The activities engaged in by the Company require it to be licensed as a clinical laboratory and tissue bank under Georgia, New York, California and Florida law. The Company has such licenses, and the Company believes it is in compliance with applicable state laws and regulations relating to clinical laboratories and tissue banks which store, process and distribute human tissue designed to be used for medical purposes in human beings. There can be no assurance, however, that more restrictive state laws or regulations will not be adopted in the future that could adversely affect the Company's operations. Certain employees of the Company have obtained other required licenses. Foreign Approval Requirements Sales of medical devices and biological products outside the U.S. are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country. Approval of a product by comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries must be obtained prior to commercializationcommercial distribution of the product in those countries. The time required to obtain foreign approvals may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. The European CommunityEC recognizes a single approval, called a CE Mark, which allows for distribution of an approved product throughout the European CommunityEC (15 countries) without additional general applications to each country. However, individual EC members reserve the right to require additional data to address particular patient safety issues prior to allowing importation. France and an increasing number of EC members require such additional data for products containing material of animal origin. The CE Mark is awarded by third parties called Notified Bodies. These Notified Bodies are approved and subject to review by the Competent Authorities of their respective countries. A number of countries outside of the European CommunityEC accept the CE Mark in lieu of clinical data submission as an addendum to that country's application process. The Company has been issued CE Marks issued by LRQA for the distribution of its CyroLife-O'BrienCryoLife-O'Brien and CryoLife-Ross porcine heart valves, BioGlue surgical adhesive, and IFM single-use medical devices in the European Community.its SynerGraft pulmonary heart valve. The Company's porcine heart valves may be exported to specified developed nations, including countries in the European Community,EC, Australia, Canada, 20 Israel, Japan, New Zealand, South Africa and Switzerland if they comply with the laws of that country and have valid marketing authorization by the appropriate authority in that country. Beginning in July 1998, CE Mark Certification is required to market porcine heart valves and other bioprosthetics in the EC. Environmental Matters The Company's tissue processing activities generate some biomedical wastes consisting primarily of human pathological and biological wastes, including human tissue and body fluids removed during laboratory procedures. The biomedical wastes generated by the Company are placed in appropriately constructed and labeled containers and are segregated from other wastes generated by the Company. The Company contracts with third parties for transport, treatment and disposal of biomedical waste. Although the Company believes it is in compliance with applicable laws and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, the failure by the Company to comply fully with any such regulations could result in an imposition of penalties, fines or sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business. Employees At March 20, 20002001 the Company had approximately 410340 employees. These employees included 1311 persons with PhD degrees. None of the Company's employees is represented by a labor organization or covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage or interruption due to labor disputes. Management believes its relations with its employees are good. 20 RISK FACTORS Dependence on Cryopreservation of Human Tissue A significant portion of the Company's current revenues is derived from the cryopreservation of human.human tissues. The success of this business depends upon, among other factors, the availability of sufficient quantities of tissue from human donors. Any material reduction in the supply of donated human tissue could restrict the Company's growth. The Company relies primarily upon the efforts of third party procurement agencies and tissue banks (all of which are not-for-profit) and others to educate the public and foster a willingness to donate tissue. Based on the Company's experience with human heart valves and vascular and orthopaedic tissues, management believes that once the use by physicians of a particular transplantable tissue gains acceptance, demand for that tissue will exceed the amount of tissue available from human donors. Failure of the Company to maintain its supply of tissue for cryopreservation could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, a reduction in the demand for the Company's cryopreserved human tissue could also have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Such reduction could occur if competitors' products were perceived as either functionally superior or more cost effective, if the number of procedures in which cryopreserved tissues are used declines or if hospitals acquire sufficient inventories of cryopreserved tissue to allow a reduction in new orders. See "-Intense"--Intense Competition" and "-Uncertainties"--Uncertainties Regarding Future Health Care Reimbursement." Intense Competition The Company faces competition from other companies that cryopreserve human tissue, as well as companies that market mechanical valves and synthetic and animal tissue for implantation.implantation and companies that market wound closure products. Management believes that at least three tissue banks offer cryopreservation services for human heart valves and many companies offer processed porcine heart valves and mechanical heart valves. A few companies dominate portions of the mechanical and porcine heart valve markets, including St. Jude Medical, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Baxter International Inc.Edwards Life Sciences. The Company is aware that several companies have surgical adhesive products under development. Competitive products may also be under development by other large medical device, pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies. Many of 21 the Company's competitors have greater financial, technical, manufacturing and marketing resources than the Company and are well established in their markets. There can be no assurance that the Company's products and services will be able to compete successfully with the products of these or other companies. Any products developed by the Company that gain regulatory clearance or approval will have to compete for market acceptance and market share. Failure of the Company to compete effectively could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Business-Competition."Business--Competition." Rapid Technological Change The technologies underlying the Company's products and services are subject to rapid and profound technological change. The Company expects competition to intensify as technical advances in each field are made and become more widely known. There can be no assurance that others will not develop products or processes with significant advantages over the products and processes that the Company offers or is seeking to develop. Any such occurrence could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Uncertainties Regarding Products in Development The Company's growth and profitability will depend, in part, upon its ability to complete development of and successfully introduce new products, including additional applications of its BioGlue and SynerGraft technologytechnologies and its FibRx technologyACT technology. The Company may be required to undertake time consuming and costly 21 development activities and seek regulatory clearance or approval for new products. See "-Extensive"--Extensive Government Regulation." Although the Company has conducted pre-clinical studies on many of its products under development which indicate that such products may be effective in a particular application, there can be no assurance that the results obtained from humanexpanded clinical studies will be consistent with earlier pre-clinicaltrial results or be sufficient for the Company to obtain any required regulatory approvals or clearances. There can be no assurance that the Company will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of new products, that regulatory clearance or approval of these or any new products will be granted on a timely basis, if ever, or that the new products will adequately meet the requirements of the applicable market or achieve market acceptance. The completion of the development of any of the Company's products remains subject to all of the risks associated with the commercialization of new products based on innovative technologies, including unanticipated technical or other problems, manufacturing difficulties and the possible insufficiency of the funds allocated for the completion of such development. Consequently, there can be no assurance that any of the Company's products under development will be successfully developed or manufactured or, if developed and manufactured, that such products will meet price or performance objectives, be developed on a timely basis or prove to be as effective as competing products. The inability to complete successfully the development of a product or application, or a determination by the Company, for financial, technical or other reasons, not to complete development of any product or application, particularly in instances in which the Company has made significant capital expenditures, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company's BioGlue surgical adhesive is currently offered for sale in the U.S. pursuant to an HDE approval, which provides for limited distributiondistribution. On February 1, 2001 the Company submitted a PMA to the FDA for the use only as an adjunctof BioGlue in the repair of acute thoracic aortic dissections.vascular and cardiac surgery. There can be no assurance that the Company will obtain thethis or other necessary approvals to allow for general distribution of its BioGlue surgical adhesive in the U.S. The Company's porcine heart valve products, including its SynerGraft treated porcine valves, are currently only offered for sale outside of the U.S.U.S . The Company's porcine heart valves are subject to the risk that the Company may be unable to obtain regulatory approval necessary to permit commercial distribution of these products in the U.S. The Company's research and development efforts are time consuming and expensive and there can be no assurance that these efforts will lead to commercially successful products or services. Even the successful commercialization of a new service or product in the medical industry can be characterized by slow growth and high costs associated with marketing, under-utilized production capacity and continuing research, and development and education costs. Generally, the introduction of new human tissue products requires significant physician training and years of clinical evidence derived from follow-up studies on human implant recipients in order to gain acceptance in the medical community. Uncertainties Regarding the Funding of the ACT Technology The ACT technology is a reversible linker technology that has potential uses in the areas of cancer therapy, blood clot dissolving, heart attack therapies and other drug delivery applications. The Company has formed AuraZyme, a wholly-owned subsidiary, in order to seek funding for the development of the ACT technology. This strategy is designed to allow the Company to continue development of this technology without incurring additional research and development expenditures, other than through AuraZyme. There can be no guarantee that such funding can be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all. If such funding is not obtained, the Company may be unable to effectively test and 22 develop the ACT technology, and may therefore be unable to determine its effectiveness. Even if such financing is obtained, there is no guarantee that the ACT technology will in fact prove to be effective in the above applications. Failure to obtain the desired financing, or failure of the ACT technology to perform as anticipated in future tests, could have a material adverse effect on our future expansion plans and could limit future growth. Uncertainties Regarding the SynerGraft Technology The Company currently processes both porcine and human tissues with the SynerGraft process. In animal studies, explanted porcine heart valves have been shown to repopulate with the hosts' cells. However, should SynerGraft-treated tissues implanted in humans not repopulate with the human host cells, the SynerGraft-treated tissues may not have the longevity that the Company currently expects. This could have a material adverse effect on future expansion plans and could limit future growth. Extensive Government Regulation Government regulation in the U.S., the European CommunityEC and other jurisdictions represents a potentially determinative factor in the success of the Company's efforts to market and develop its products. See "Business-Government"Business--Government Regulation." The human heart valves to which the Company applies its cryopreservation services are currently regulated as Class II medical devices by the FDA and are subject to significant regulatory requirements, including Quality System Regulations and recordkeeping requirements. There can be no assurance that changes in regulatory treatment or the adoption of new statutory or regulatory requirements will not occur, which could adversely impact the marketing or development of these products or could adversely affect market demand for these products. Other allograft tissues processed and distributed by the Company are currently regulated as "human tissue" under a rulerules promulgated by the FDA pursuant to the Public Health Services Act. This rule establishesThese rules establish requirements for donor testing and screening of human tissue and recordkeeping relating to these activities.activities and impose certain registration and product listing requirements on establishments that process or distribute human tissue or cellular-based products. Although the Company's other human tissue allografts are not currently regulated as medical devices, such tissue may in the future become subject to more extensive FDA regulation, which could include PMA or product licensing requirements. BioGlue surgical adhesive is regulated as a Class III medical device and the Company believes that FibRx surgical sealant willits ACT technology may be regulated as a biologic or drug by the FDA. BioGlue surgical adhesive has been approved for limited distribution in the U.S. under a Humanitarian Device Exemption while FibRx surgical sealantthe ACT technology has not been approved for commercial distribution in the U.S. or elsewhere. Fixed porcine heart valve products are classified as Class III medical devices. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the FDA approval required to distribute its surgical sealants or porcine heart valve products in the U.S., or the approval for unlimited distribution of its BioGlue surgical adhesive in the U.S. Distribution of these products within the European CommunityEC is dependent upon the Company maintaining its CE Mark and ISO 9001 certifications, of which there can be no assurance. Most of the Company's products in development, if successfully developed, will require regulatory approvals from the FDA and perhaps other regulatory authorities before they may be commercially distributed. The process of obtaining required regulatory approvals from the FDA normally involves clinical trials and the preparation of an extensive PMA application and often takes many years. The process is expensive and can vary significantly based on the type, complexity and novelty of the product. There can be no assurance that any products developed by the Company, independently or in collaboration with others, will receive the required approvals for manufacturing and marketing. Delays in obtaining U.S. or foreign approvals could result in substantial additional cost to the Company and adversely affect the Company's competitive position. The FDA may also place conditions on product approvals that could restrict commercial applications of such products. Product marketing approvals or clearances may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained or if problems occur following initial marketing. Delays imposed by 23 the governmental clearance process may materially reduce the period during which the Company has the exclusive right to commercialize patented products. Also, delays or rejections may be encountered during any stage of the regulatory approval process based upon the failure of the clinical or other data to demonstrate compliance with, or upon the failure of the product to meet, the regulatory agency's requirements for safety, efficacy and quality, and those requirements may become more stringent due to changes in applicable law, regulatory agency policy or the adoption of new regulations. Clinical trials may also be delayed due to unanticipated side effects, inability to locate, recruit and qualify sufficient numbers of patients, lack of funding, the inability to locate or recruit clinical investigation,investigators, the redesign of clinical trial programs, the inability to manufacture or acquire sufficient quantities of the particular product candidate or any other components required for clinical trials, changes in the Company's or its collaborative partners' development focus and disclosure of trial results by competitors. Even if regulatory approval is obtained for any of the Company's products or services, the scope of the approval may significantly limit the indicated usage for which such products or services may be marketed. 23 Products marketed by the Company pursuant to FDA or foreign oversight or approval are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation. In the U.S., devices and biologics must be manufactured in registered and,establishments (and, in the case of biologics, licensed establishmentsestablishments) and must be produced in accordance with Quality System Regulations. Manufacturing facilities and processes are subject to periodic FDA inspection. Labeling and promotional activities are also subject to scrutiny by the FDA and, in certain instances, by the Federal Trade Commission. The export of devices and biologics is also subject to regulation and may require FDA approval. From time to time, the FDA may modify such regulations, imposing additional or different requirements. Failure to comply with any applicable FDA requirements, which may be ambiguous, could result in civil and criminal enforcement actions, product recalls or detentions and other penalties and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, NOTA prohibits the acquisition or transfer of human organs for "valuable consideration" for use in human transplantation. NOTA permits the payment of reasonable expenses associated with the removal, transportation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of human organs. There can be no assurance that restrictive interpretations of NOTA will not be adopted in the future that will challenge one or more aspects of the Company's methods of charging for its cryopreservation services. The Company's laboratory operations are subject to the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Environmental Protection Agency requirements for prevention of occupational exposure to infectious agents and hazardous chemicals and protection of the environment. Some states have enacted statutes and regulations governing the processing, transportation and storage of human organs and tissue. While management believes that the Company is presently in compliance in all material respects with all such applicable statutes and regulations, there can be no assurance that more restrictive state laws or regulations will not be adopted in the future that could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Business-Government"Business--Government Regulation." Uncertainties Related to Patents and Protection of Proprietary Technology The Company owns several patents, patent applications and licenses relating to its technologies, which it believes provide important competitive advantages. There can be no assurance that the Company's pending patent applications will issue as patents or that challenges will not be instituted concerning the validity or enforceability of any patent owned by the Company, or, if instituted, that such challenges will not be successful. The cost of litigation to uphold the validity and prevent infringement of a patent could be substantial. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that competitors will not independently develop similar technologies or duplicate the Company's technologies or design around the patented aspects of the Company's technologies. There can be no assurance that the Company's proposed technologies will not infringe patents or other rights owned by others. In addition, under certain of the Company's license agreements, if the Company fails to meet certain contractual obligations, including the payment of minimum royalty amounts, such licenses may become nonexclusive or terminable by the licensor, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the Company protects its proprietary technologies and processes in part by confidentiality agreements with its collaborative partners, employees and consultants. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that the Company will have adequate remedies for any breach or that the Company's trade secrets will not otherwise become known or independently discovered by competitors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Uncertainties Regarding Future Health Care Reimbursement Even though the Company does not receive payments directly from third-party health care payors, their reimbursement methods and policies impact demand for the Company's cryopreserved tissue and other services and products. The Company's cryopreservation services may be particularly susceptible to third-party cost containment measures. In particular, the initial cost of a 24 cryopreserved human heart valve generally exceeds the cost of a mechanical, synthetic or animal-derived valve. The Company is unable to predict what changes will be made in the reimbursement methods and policies utilized by third-party health care payors or their effect on the Company. Changes in the reimbursement methods and policies utilized by third-party health care payors, including Medicare, with respect to cryopreserved tissues provided for implant by the Company and other Company services and products, could have a material adverse 24 effect on the Company. Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved health care products and services and there can be no assurance that adequate third-party coverage will be available for the Company to maintain price levels sufficient for realization of an appropriate return on its investment in developing new products. Government and other third-party payors are increasingly attempting to contain health care costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for new products approved for marketing by the FDA and by refusing in some cases to provide any coverage for uses of approved products for indications for which the FDA has not granted marketing approval. If adequate coverage and reimbursement levels are not provided by government and other third-party payors for uses of the Company's new products and services, market acceptance of these products would be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Dependence on Key Personnel The Company's business and future operating results depend in significant part upon the continued contributions of its key technical personnel and senior management, many of whom would be difficult to replace. The Company's business and future operating results also depend in significant part upon its ability to attract and retain qualified management, processing, technical, marketing, sales and support personnel for its operation. Competition for such personnel is intense and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. The loss of key employees, the failure of any key employee to perform adequately or the Company's inability to attract and retain skilled employees as needed could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Product Liability and Insurance The use of the Company's products and human tissue processed by the Company involves the possibility of adverse effects that could expose the Company to product liability claims. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision held that priorproduct liability may exist despite FDA approval, or clearance of the product did not preempt product liability actions involving the product. FDA and future court decisions may also increase the Company's risk of product liability. From time to time, the Company is involved in legal proceedings based on product liability claims of a nature considered normal to its business. The Company's products are used by health care providers in connection with the treatment of patients, who will, on occasion, sustain injury or die as a result of their condition or medical treatment. If a lawsuit is filed because of such an occurrence, the Company, along with physicians and nurses, hospitals and other medical suppliers, may be named as a defendant, and whether or not the Company is ultimately determined to be liable, the Company may incur significant legal expenses. In addition, such litigation could damage the Company's reputation and therefore impair its ability to market its products or obtain product liability insurance and could cause the premiums for such insurance to increase. Although the Company has incurred minimal losses due to product liability claims to date, there can be no assurance that it will not incur significant losses in the future. The Company currently maintains product liability insurance in the aggregate amount of $14 million per year. There can be no assurance that such coverage will continue to be available on terms acceptable to the Company or will be adequate to cover any losses due to product claims if actually incurred. Furthermore, if any such claim is successful, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Business-Legal"Business--Legal Proceedings." Use and Disposal of Hazardous Material The Company's research, development and processing activities involve the controlled use of small quantities of radioactive compounds, chemical solvents and other hazardous materials. The Company's activities also include the preservation and growth of human cells and the processing of human tissue. 25 Although the Company believes that its safety procedures for handling, processing and disposing of hazardous materials and human tissue comply with the standards prescribed by federal, state and local regulations, the risk of accidental contamination, injury or disease transmission from these materials cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of such an accident or transmission, the Company could be held liable for resulting damages and any liability could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, 25 financial condition and results of operations. Also, any failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in the imposition of penalties, fines and sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Volatility of Securities Prices The trading price of the Company's Common Stock has been subject to wide fluctuations from time to time and may continue to be subject to such volatility in the future. Trading price fluctuations can be caused by a variety of factors, including quarter to quarter variations in operating results, announcement of technological innovations or new products by the Company or its competitors, governmental regulatory acts, developments with respect to patents or proprietary rights, general conditions in the medical device or service industries, actions taken by government regulators, changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or other events or factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control. If the Company's revenues or operating results in future quarters fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, the price of the Company's Common Stock would likely decline, perhaps substantially. Changes in the trading price of the Company's Common Stock may bear no relation to the Company's actual operational or financial results. Anti-Takeover Provisions The Company's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws contain provisions that may discourage or make more difficult any attempt by a person or group to obtain control of the Company, including provisions authorizing the issuance of preferred stock without shareholder approval, restricting the persons who may call a special meeting of the shareholders and prohibiting shareholders from taking action by written consent. In addition, the Company is subject to certain provisions of Florida law that may discourage or make more difficult takeover attempts or acquisitions of substantial amounts of the Company's Common Stock. Further, pursuant to the terms of a shareholder rights plan adopted in 1995, each outstanding share of Common Stock has one attached right. The rights will cause substantial dilution of the ownership of a person or group that attempts to acquire the Company on terms not approved by the Board and may have the effect of deterring hostile takeover attempts. Absence of Dividends The Company has not paid, and does not presently intend to pay, cash dividends. The Company's major credit agreement contains, and future credit agreements may contain, financial covenants, including covenants to maintain certain levels of net worth and certain leverage ratios, which could have the effect of restricting the amount of dividends that the Company may pay. It is not likely that any cash dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future. Forward-Looking Statements This Form 10-K includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K which address activities, events or developments which the 26 Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements regarding the Company's competitive position, the successful development of its SynerGraft porcine valves, the funding to continue development of FibRx surgical sealant,the ACT technology, other estimated dates relating to the Company's proposed regulatory submissions, the timing of the Company's clinical trials for the approval of BioGlue surgical adhesive for general vascular repair, the timing of the completion of the expansion of the Company's corporate headquatersheadquarters and manufacturing facilities, the Company's expectations regarding the adequacy of current financing arrangements, product demand and market growth, the impactpotential of the introduction of BioGlueACT technologies for use in the U.S. or marketing opportunities for the Company's single-use medical devicescancer therapies, blood clot dissolving, heart attack therapies and other drug delivery applications and other statements regarding future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar 26 expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform with the Company's expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations, including the risk factors discussed in this Form 10-K and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-K are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by the Company will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on the Company or its business or operations. The Company assumes no obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Item 2. Properties. The Company's facilities (other than its single use medical device manufacturing plant) are located in suburban Atlanta, Georgia, and consistin Fareham, United Kingdom. The Atlanta facility consists of three separate locations totaling approximately 130,000 square feet of leased office, laboratory and warehouse space. Approximately 30,00017,500 square feet are dedicated to laboratory work areas. The primary facility, which does not include the FibRxbiomedical products laboratory and the bioprosthetic manufacturing operation, has four main laboratory facilities: human tissue processing, BioGlue manufacturing, research and development, and microbiology. Each of these areas consists of a general technician work area and adjoining "clean rooms" for work with human tissue and for aseptic processing. The clean rooms are supplied with highly filtered air which provides a near-sterile environment. The human tissue processing laboratory contains approximately 7,700 square feet with a suite of seven clean rooms. The BioGlue manufacturing laboratory contains approximately 12,9004,500 square feet with a suite of 2four clean rooms. The research and development laboratory is approximately 5,500 square feet with a suite of five clean rooms. The microbiology laboratory is approximately 3,200 square feet with a suite of three clean rooms. The FibRxbiomedical products laboratory facility contains approximately 11,000 square feet, including approximately 4,000 square feet of laboratory space with a suite of eight clean rooms. The Company's porcine heart valves are manufactured in the Company's bioprosthesis laboratory, which contains approximately 13,00020,500 square feet, with about 3,5002,100 square feet of laboratory space and a suite of foursix clean rooms for tissue processing. TheSubsequent to the sale of the remaining IFM assets, the Company manufactures single-use medical devices atcontinues to lease the Company's30,000 square foot IFM subsidiary locatedfacility in St. Petersburg, Florida. This facility is approximately 30,000 square feet and is leasedFlorida from the former principal shareholder of IFM. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Vascutech, Inc. currently subleases the IFM facility from the Company. The Company's lease and sublease on its IFM facility expires in 2007. The Europa facility located in Fareham, United Kingdom contains approximately 5,600 square feet of office, warehousing and training laboratory space. In February 2000 the Company began construction of a major new addition to its corporate headquarters and manufacturing facilities located in suburban Atlanta, Georgia. The new addition will consistconsists of a two-story 100,000 square foot manufacturing facility for BioGlue surgical adhesive and SynerGraft heart valves,products, as well as physician training laboratories and additional corporate office space. The Company anticipates completion of the project in mid to late 2001. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. Management believes that no currently ongoing litigation, if determined adversely to the Company, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. 27 Item 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders. Inapplicable. 27 Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant. Each of the executive officers of the Registrant was elected by the Board of Directors to serve until the Board of Directors' meeting immediately following the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his earlier removal by the Board of Directors or his resignation. The following table lists the executive officers of the Registrant and their ages, positions with the Registrant, and the dates from which they have continually served in their present positions with the Registrant.
Date First Elected to Name Age Position Present Office - - ----------- --- --------- ----------------------------- -------------- Steven G. Anderson 6162 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman February, 1984 Sidney B. Ashmore 42 Vice President, Marketing March, 2001 Kirby S. Black, PhD 4546 Senior Vice President, Research and Development July, 1995 Edwin B. Cordell, Jr., CPA 41 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer December, 1994 David M. Fronk 3637 Vice President, Clinical Research December, 1998 Albert E. Heacox, PhD 4950 Senior Vice President, Laboratory Operations June, 1995 Gerald B. Seery 43D. Ashley Lee, CPA 36 Vice President Marketing August, 1995and Chief Financial Officer April, 2000 James C. Vander Wyk, PhD 5556 Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality February, 1996 Assurance Ronald D. McCall, Esq. 6364 Director, Secretary and Treasurer January, 1984
Steven G. Anderson, a founder of the Company, has served as the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman since its inception. Mr. Anderson has more than 30 years of experience in the implantable medical device industry. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Anderson was Senior Executive Vice President and Vice President, Marketing, from 1976 until 1983 of Intermedics, Inc. (now Guidant, Inc.), a manufacturer and distributor of pacemakers and other medical devices. Mr. Anderson received his BA from the University of Minnesota. Sydney B. Ashmore has served as Vice President of Marketing since March 2001 and has been with the Company since September 1996 as Director of Marketing. Mr. Ashmore is responsible for developing and implementing the Company's sales and marketing plans and supervising all tissue procurement activities. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ashmore held senior marketing positions with Baxter Healthcare from 1991 to 1996, and general management positions with Amorient Aquafarms from 1985 - 1989. Mr. Ashmore received his BA from Vanderbilt University in 1981, his MS from the University of Hawaii in 1985 and his MBA from Northwestern University in 1991. Kirby S. Black, PhD, has served as Vice President of Research and Development since July 1995. Dr. Black was promoted to Senior Vice President in December of 2000. Dr. Black is responsible for the continued development of the Company's current products as well as the evaluation of new technologies. Dr. Black is listed on threesix patents and has authored over 125130 publications. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Black was Director, Medical Information and Project Leader from July 1993 until July 1994 at Advanced Tissue Sciences, LaJolla, California. Dr. Black has also held a number of positions at the University of California at Irvine, including Director, Transplantation and Immunology Laboratories, Department of Surgery. Dr. Black received his BSBSME degree from the University of California, Los Angeles, and his PhD degree in immunology from the University of California at Irvine. Edwin B. Cordell, Jr., CPA, has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since November 1994. From August 1987 to November 1994, Mr. Cordell served as Controller and Chief Financial Officer of Video Display Corporation, a publically held consumer electronics manufacturing and distribution company. Mr. Cordell received his BS in Accounting from the University of Tennessee. David M. Fronk was appointed to the position of Vice President of Clinical Research in December 1998 and has been with the Company since 1992. Mr. Fronk is responsible for managing the preclinicalpre-clinical and clinical investigations for all products, as well as monitoring product performance. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Fronk held engineering positions with Zimmer Inc. from 1986 until 28 1988 and Baxter Healthcare Corporation from 1988 until 1991. MrMr. Fronk served as a market manager with Baxter Healthcare Corporation from 1991 until 1992. Mr. Fronk received his BS in Mechanical Engineering at The Ohio State University in 1985 and his MS in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State University in 1986. Albert E. Heacox, PhD, has served as Vice President, Laboratory Operations since June 1988 and has been with the Company since June of 1985. Dr. Heacox was promoted to Senior Vice President in December of 2000. Dr. Heacox has been responsible for developing protocols and procedures for both cardiovascular and connective tissues, implementing upgrades in procedures in conjunction with the Company's quality assurance programs, and overseeing all production activities of the Company's laboratories. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Heacox worked as a researcher with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and North Dakota State University, developing methods for the cryopreservation of cells and animal germ plasm storage. Dr. Heacox received a BA and an MS in Biology from Adelphi University, and received his PhD in Biology from Washington State University and completed his post-doctorate training in cell biology at the University of Cologne, West Germany. Gerald B. SeeryD. Ashley Lee, CPA, has served as Vice President of Marketing since August 1995 and has been withChief Financial Officer of the Company since July 1993.April 2000 and had previously served as controller of the Company since December 1994. Mr. SeeryLee is responsible for developing and implementing the Company's sales and marketing plans and supervising all tissue procurement activities. Prior to joiningfinancial affairs of the Company, as well as information technology, human resources, and purchasing. From 1993 to 1994, Mr. Seery held senior marketing management positionsLee served as the Assistant Director of Finance for Compass Retail Inc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Equitable Real Estate. From 1987 to 1993, Mr. Lee was employed as a certified public accountant with Meadox Medicals from 1982 until 1985, Electro Catheter Corporation from 1985 until 1989 and Daig Corporation from 1992 until 1993, accumulating fifteen years of specialized marketing experience in cardiovascular medical devices.Ernst & Young, LLP. Mr. SeeryLee received his BABS in International Economics at The CatholicAccounting from the University of America in Washington, D.C. in 1978 and completed his MBA at Columbia University in New York in 1980. 28 Mississippi. James C. Vander Wyk, PhD, has served as Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance of the Company since February 1996. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Vander Wyk held senior management positions at Schneider (USA), Inc. from 1993 until 1996, Pharmacia Deltec, Inc. from 1985 until 1993, Delmed, Inc. from 1980 until 1985 and Pharmaco, Inc. from 1975 to 1979, gaining 20 years of experience in Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance. Dr. Vander Wyk received his BS in Pharmacy from the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and his PhD in Microbiology from the University of Massachusetts. Dr. Vander Wyk performed his NIH Postdoctoral Fellowship at the University of Illinois. Ronald D. McCall has served as a director of the Company and as the Secretary and Treasurer of the Company since January 1984. From 1985 to the present, Mr. McCall has been the proprietor of the law firm of Ronald D. McCall, Attorney At Law, Tampa, Florida. Mr. McCall was admitted to the practice of law in Florida in 1961. Mr. McCall received his BA and JD degrees from the University of Florida. 29 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters. The response to Item 5 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption "Market Price of Common Stock" on page 35 of the annual shareholders report for the year ended December 31, 1999.2000. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. The response to Item 6 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption "Selected Financial Information" on page 36 of the annual shareholders report for the year ended December 31, 1999.2000. Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Overview CryoLife, Inc. was organized in 1984 to address market opportunities in the area of biological implantable products and materials, and today is the leader in the preservation of viable human tissue for cardiovascular, vascular, and orthopaedic applications. The responseCompany pays a fee to Item 7 is incorporated herein by referencean organ procurement agency or tissue bank at the time such organization consigns human tissue to the information set forthCompany. The Company generates revenues from preservation services by charging hospitals a fee, which covers the Company's services, the associated procurement fee, and applicable shipping expenses. The Company records revenue upon shipping tissue. Costs associated with the procurement, processing, and storage of tissue are accounted for as deferred preservation costs on the Company's consolidated balance sheet and are expensed when the tissue is shipped. Through a series of acquisitions of intellectual property and businesses, the Company has expanded its portfolio of products and services. As a result, the Company also develops implantable biomaterials, including BioGlue surgical adhesive, which is approved for distribution in 42 countries; SynerGraft, a tissue engineering technology which incorporates the use of decellularized animal tissues with the potential to remodel in vivo; and other stentless porcine heart valves that are approved for distribution internationally. In 1996, the Company also acquired the assets of UCFI, a tissue processor, for $750,000 in cash and a $1.3 million note. In 1997, the Company acquired Ideas for Medicine, Inc. ("IFM") and its line of single-use medical devices for $4.5 million in cash, and a $5.0 million convertible debenture. On September 30, 1998 the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the IFM product line and certain related assets to Horizon Medical Products, Inc. ("HMP") for $15 million in cash pursuant to an asset purchase agreement. Concurrently, IFM and HMP signed a Manufacturing Agreement (the "Agreement") which provided for the manufacture by IFM of specified minimum dollar amounts of IFM products to be purchased exclusively by HMP over each of the four years following the sale. Thereafter, responsibility for such manufacturing was to be assumed by HMP. The Company recorded a deferred gain at the transaction date totaling $2.9 million, representing the selling price less the net book value of the assets sold, which included $7.7 million of goodwill, net of accumulated 30 amortization, and the costs related to the sale. The gain was deferred because the sale and the manufacturing agreements represent, in the aggregate, a single transaction for which the related income should be recognized over the term of the Agreement. Accordingly, the deferred gain was reflected in cost of goods sold during 1999 and 1998 to maintain margins that would have been approximately equal over the four-year period of the Agreement on the products manufactured and sold by IFM to HMP. During 1999 and 1998 amortization of deferred revenue totaled $1.2 million and $387,000, respectively. As more fully discussed under nonrecurring charges in the Results of Operations section, HMP defaulted on the Agreement in June of 1999. On October 9, 2000 the Company sold substantially all of the remaining assets of Ideas for Medicine, Inc. ("IFM") to Horizon Medical Products, Inc. ("HMP"). The assets consisted primarily of inventory, equipment and leasehold improvements which had a net book value of $2.4 million at the date of sale. The transaction provided for HMP to pay the Company the sum of approximately $5.9 million, payable in equal monthly installments of principal and interest of $140,000. The note consists of a portion, approximately $3.8 million, which bears interest at 9% per year, and a non-interest-bearing portion of approximately $2.1 million. The note also requires an additional $1 million principal payment at any time prior to April 3, 2001. If the $1 million payment is made when due, and no other defaults exist under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis" on pages 16 though 21note, then $1 million of the annual shareholders reportnon-interest-bearing portion of the note will be forgiven. In addition, at such time as the principal balance has been paid down to $1.1 million and there have been no defaults under the promissory note, the remainder of the note will be forgiven and the note will be canceled. The Company has recorded reserves against these notes such that the gain from the sale is deferred until the full amount of the note is deemed collectible. On March 30, 2001, HMP transferred the IFM assets to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vascutech, Inc. and the HMP note was assumed by the Vascutech subsidiary. The assumed note is guaranteed by Vascutech, Inc. The composition of the Company's revenues is expected to change in future years, reflecting, among other things, the anticipated growth in shipments of human vascular tissue and human connective tissue for the knee, and the introduction of BioGlue surgical adhesive into domestic and international markets, as well as other expected new products. Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999 Revenues increased 16% to $77.1 million in 2000 from $66.7 million in 1999. The increase in revenues was primarily due to increased acceptance in the medical community of preserved tissues which has resulted in increased demand for the Company's preservation services, the Company's ability to procure greater amounts of tissue, revenues attributable to the Company's introduction of BioGlue surgical adhesive in domestic markets in January of 2000, and other reasons discussed below. These increases in revenues have been offset by certain decreases in revenues as discussed below. Revenues from human heart valve and conduit cryopreservation services increased 2% to $29.7 million in 2000 from $29.0 million in 1999, representing 39% and 44%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. This increase in revenues resulted from a 5% increase in the number of heart allograft shipments due to increased demand. Revenues from human vascular tissue cryopreservation services increased 10% to $21.3 million in 2000 from $19.3 million in 1999, representing 28% and 29%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. This increase in revenues was primarily due to an 11% increase in the number of vascular allograft shipments due to an increased demand for saphenous vein, the Company's ability to procure greater amounts of tissue, and the growth in demand for the Company's cryopreserved femoral vein for dialysis access. Revenues from human connective tissue of the knee cryopreservation services increased 44% to $16.1 million in 2000 from $11.2 million in 1999, representing 21% and 17%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. This increase in revenues was primarily due to a 45% increase in the number of allograft shipments due to increased acceptance of osteoarticular grafts and non-bone tendons by the orthopaedic surgeon community and the Company's ability to procure greater amounts of tissue. 31 Revenues from the sale of BioGlue surgical adhesive increased 287% to $6.4 million for 2000 from $1.7 million in 1999, representing 8% and 2%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. The increase in revenues is due to a 177% increase in the number of milliliter shipment s of BioGlue. The increase in shipments was primarily due to the introduction of BioGlue in domestic markets in January of 2000 pursuant to a Humanitarian Use Device Exemption for the use of BioGlue as an adjunct in the repair of acute thoracic aortic dissections, as well as greater product awareness since the introduction of BioGlue in international markets in April of 1998, increased surgeon training, and the receipt of the CE approval for pulmonary indications in Europe in March 1999. Revenues from bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices decreased 19% to $771,000 in 2000 from $955,000 in 1999, representing 1% of total revenues during such periods. This decrease in revenues is primarily due to the Company's focus on the start-up of the SynerGraft heart valve manufacturing process, which adversely impacted its ability to manufacture other bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices. Revenues from IFM decreased 41% to $2.2 million in 2000 from $3.7 million in 1999, representing 3% and 6%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. The decrease in revenues is due to HMP's default under its manufacturing agreement and to the sale of the remaining assets of IFM to HMP. Grant revenues decreased to $616,000 in 2000 from $877,000 in 1999. Grant revenues are primarily attributable to the SynerGraft research and development programs. Cost of cryopreservation services and products aggregated $33.3 million in 2000 compared to $30.2 million in 1999, representing 44% and 46%, respectively, of total cryopreservation and product revenues. The decrease in the 2000 cost of cryopreservation services and products as a percentage of revenues results from an increase in revenues from BioGlue surgical adhesive, which carry higher gross margins than cryopreservation services, and from a greater portion of 2000 orthopaedic cryopreservation revenues being derived from services that have higher gross margins than other orthopaedic cryopreservation services, partially offset by a lesser portion of 2000 revenues being derived from human heart valve and conduit cryopreservation services, which carry higher gross margins than other cryopreservation services. General, administrative, and marketing expenses increased 16% to $28.7 million in 2000, compared to $24.7 million in 1999, representing 38% of total cryopreservation and product revenues for each period. The increase in expenditures in 2000 resulted from expenses incurred to support the increase in revenues and expenses associated with the establishment of the Company's European headquarters. Research and development expenses increased 18% to $5.2 million in 2000, compared to $4.4 million in 1999, representing 7% of total cryopreservation and product revenues for each period. Research and development spending relates principally to the Company's ongoing human clinical trials for its BioGlue surgical adhesive and to its focus on its SynerGraft and BioGlue technologies. As more fully discussed in the following comparison of years ended December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, the Company recorded a nonrecurring charge of $2.4 million in 1999 primarily as a result of HMP's default on its manufacturing contract with IFM. Net interest income was $1.7 million and $1.2 in 2000 and 1999, respectively. This increase in interest income was due primarily to the increase in cash generated from operations during the year ended December 31, 2000. The effective income tax rate was 33% and 32% for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998 Revenues increased 10% to $66.7 million in 1999 from $60.7 million in 1998. The increase in revenues was primarily due to increased acceptance in the medical community of cryopreserved tissues, the Company's ability to procure greater amounts of tissue, price increases for certain cryopreservation services instituted during the third quarter of 1998 which continued during 1999, a full 32 year of BioGlue international revenue in 1999 as compared to nine months in 1998, and revenues attributable to the Company's introduction of osteoarticular grafts in January 1999. These increases in revenues have been offset by certain decreases in revenues as discussed below. Revenues from human heart valve and conduit cryopreservation services decreased 6% to $29.0 million in 1999 from $30.8 million in 1998, representing 44% and 51%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. This decrease in revenues resulted from an 8% decrease in the number of heart allograft shipments, which decrease consisted primarily of a 9% decrease in the number of pulmonary heart valve shipments due to a decrease in the number of Ross procedures being performed and competitive price pressures on pulmonary valves. In a Ross procedure, the patient's pulmonary valve is transplanted into the aortic position and a human pulmonary allograft is transplanted into the patient's pulmonary position. The Company has attempted to promote the positive clinical results of the Ross procedure by hosting science forums around the country with its cardiovascular surgeon customers. Revenues from human vascular tissue cryopreservation services increased 35% to $19.3 million in 1999 from $14.3 million in 1998, representing 29% and 24%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. This increase in revenues was primarily due to a 32% increase in the number of vascular allograft shipments attributable to an increased demand for preserved vascular tissue, the Company's ability to procure greater amounts of tissue, and the introduction of the femoral vein program for use as A-V shunts in dialysis patients. The increase in revenues was also due to the Company's focus on procuring and distributing long segment veins, which have a higher per unit revenue than the short segment veins. Revenues from human connective tissue of the knee cryopreservation services increased 45% to $11.2 million in 1999 from $7.7 million in 1998, representing 17% and 13%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. This increase in revenues was primarily due to a 31% increase in the number of allograft shipments due to increased demand, the Company's ability to procure greater amounts of tissue, and the introduction of preserved osteoarticular grafts in January of 1999. Additional revenue increases resulted from price increases for the cryopreservation of menisci and tendons during the third quarter of 1998. Revenues from IFM decreased 34% to $3.7 million in 1999 from $5.7 million in 1998, representing 6% and 9%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. The decrease in revenues is due to HMP's failure to meet the minimum purchase requirements set forth in the Agreement as more fully discussed below. Revenues from BioGlue surgical adhesive increased 88% to $1.7 million for 1999 from $883,000 in 1998, representing 2% and 1%, respectively, of total revenues during such periods. The increase in revenues is due to a 95% increase in the volume of milliliter shipments of BioGlue due to increased product awareness as a result of the introduction of BioGlue in international markets in April of 1998, increased surgeon training, and the receipt of the CE mark approval for the use of BioGlue for pulmonary indications in Europe in March 1999. Revenues from bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices increased 20% to $955,000 in 1999 from $798,000 in 1998, representing 1% of total revenues during such periods. This increase in revenues was due to a 7% increase in the number of bioprosthetic cardiovascular device shipments due to an increase in demand, a full year of international revenues from the CryoLife-Ross Pulmonary Valve in 1999 as compared to three months of revenues in 1998, and price increases in November of 1998 that continued throughout 1999. Grant revenues increased to $877,000 in 1999 from $512,000 in 1998. This increase in grant revenues is primarily attributable to the SynerGraft research and development programs. Other income decreased to $224,000 in 1999 from $1.1 million in 1998. Other income in 1998 relates primarily to proceeds from the sale of the Company's port product line. Cost of cryopreservation services and products aggregated $30.2 million in 1999 compared to $25.3 million in 1998, representing 46% and 42%, respectively, of total cryopreservation and product revenues. The increase of the cost of cryopreservation services and products as a percentage of revenues in 1999 33 results from a smaller percentage of 1999 revenues being derived from human heart valve and conduit cryopreservation services, which carry a significantly higher gross margin than other cryopreservation services. An additional reason for the increase in costs in 1999 results from the switch in October of 1998 to OEM manufacturing of single-use medical devices, which generates lower gross margins than cryopreservation services and lower gross margins than the IFM products generated prior to the sale of the IFM product line. General, administrative, and marketing expenses increased 3% to $24.7 million in 1999, compared to $23.9 million in 1998, representing 38% and 40%, respectively, of total cryopreservation and product revenues in such periods. The increase in expenditures in 1999 resulted from expenses incurred to support the increase in revenues, partially offset by increased absorption of overhead expenses associated with increased production of new products. Research and development expenses decreased 7% to $4.4 million in 1999, compared to $4.7 million in 1998, representing 7% and 8%, respectively, of total cryopreservation and product revenues for each period. Research and development spending relates principally to the Company's focus on its bioadhesives and SynerGraft technologies. The Company recorded a nonrecurring pretax charge of $2.4 million in 1999 primarily as a result of HMP's default on its manufacturing contract with IFM. On June 22, 1999 IFM notified HMP that it was in default of certain provisions of the Agreement. Specifically, HMP was in violation of the payment provisions contained within the Agreement, which calls for inventory purchases to be paid for within 45 days of delivery. Additionally, HMP was in violation due to nonpayment of interest related to such past due accounts receivable. After notification of the default, HMP indicated to the Company that it would not be able to meet and did not met the minimum purchase requirements outlined in the Agreement. Due to the significant uncertainties related to the Company's ability to realize its investment in IFM, the Company determined that it had incurred an impairment loss on its IFM assets. In calculating the amount of the impairment loss, management used its best estimate to determine the realizable value of its increase in working capital due to the HMP default, and the recoverability of IFM's long-lived assets, consisting primarily of leasehold improvements and equipment. As a result, management recorded a $2.1 million impairment loss on working capital and a $2.6 million impairment loss on leasehold improvements. Additionally, the Company offset the above charges with $2.5 million of deferred gain recorded in connection with the sale of the IFM product line to HMP. The net pretax effect of the above nonrecurring charges is $2.2 million, and has been included under the caption "Nonrecurring charges" in the accompanying Consolidated Income Statements. As previously discussed in the Overview section, on October 9, 2000 the Company sold substantially all of the remaining assets of IFM to HMP. Net interest income was $1.2 million and $820,000 in 1999 and 1998, respectively. This increase in interest income is due to recording a full year of interest income on the invested proceeds from the follow-on equity offering (the "Offering") completed in April 1998, lower interest expense resulting from the repayment of certain indebtedness with the proceeds from the Offering, and the conversion of certain convertible debentures into common stock of the Company. The increase in the effective income tax rate to 32% in 1999 from 25% in 1998, is the result of the nonrecurrence of income tax benefits realized in 1998 from the implementation of certain income tax planning strategies in the fourth quarter, which had a significant one-time impact on 1998 taxes. Despite the increase in the tax rate between 1999 and 1998, the 1999 effective tax rate is reflective of the ongoing impact of these tax planning strategies. Seasonality The demand for the Company's human heart valve and conduit cryopreservation services is seasonal, with peak demand generally occurring in the second and third quarters. Management believes this trend for human heart valve and conduit cryopreservation services is primarily due to the high number of surgeries 34 scheduled during the summer months. However, the demand for the Company's human connective tissue of the knee cryopreservation services, human vascular tissue cryopreservation services, bioprosthetic cardiovascular devices, and BioGlue surgical adhesive does not appear to experience seasonal trends. Liquidity and Capital Resources At December 31, 2000 net working capital was $68.5 million, compared to $59.6 million at December 31, 1999, with a current ratio of 7 to 1. The Company's primary capital requirements arise out of general working capital needs, capital expenditures for facilities and equipment, funding of research and development projects, and a common stock repurchase plan approved by the board of directors in October of 1998. The Company historically has funded these requirements through bank credit facilities, cash generated by operations, and equity offerings. Net cash provided by operating activities was $10.3 million in 2000, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $1.3 million in 1999. This increase primarily resulted from 1) an increase in net income, 2) a decrease in accounts receivable despite increased revenues, 3) a reduction in the growth of deferred preservation costs and inventories, and 4) an increase in the amount of accounts payable due to the timing of payments of outstanding invoices, partially offset by a decrease in accrued expenses. Net cash used in investing activities was $6.6 million in 2000, as compared to $3.6 million in 1999. This increase in cash used was primarily attributable to a increase in capital expenditures due to the expansion of the Company's corporate headquarters and manufacturing facilities, partially offset by an increase in sales of marketable equity securities during 2000. Net cash provided by financing activities was $7.8 million in 2000, as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $4.5 million in 1999. This increase was primarily attributable to the proceeds received on the bank line of credit to finance the expansion of the Company's headquarters and manufacturing facilities, a reduction in the Company's repurchase of treasury stock during 2000 and an increase in the proceeds from stock option exercises. Management is currently seeking to complete a potential private placement of equity or equity-oriented securities to form a subsidiary company for the commercial development of its serine proteinase light activation technologies through its wholly-owned subsidiary AuraZyme Pharmaceutical, Inc. This strategy, if successful, will allow an affiliated entity to fund the light activation technology and should expedite the commercial development of its blood clot dissolving and surgical sealant product applications without additional research and development expenditures by the Company (other than through the affiliated company). This strategy, if successful, will favorably impact the Company's liquidity going forward. The Company has ceased further material development of light activation technology pending the identification of a corporate partner to fund future development. The Company anticipates that current cash and marketable securities, cash generated from operations and its $10 million of bank facilities (of which $8.0 million was drawn as of March 31, 2001) will be sufficient to meet its operating and development needs for at least the next 12 months, including the expansion of the Company's corporate headquarters and manufacturing facilities. However, the Company's future liquidity and capital requirements beyond that period will depend upon numerous factors, including the timing of the Company's receipt of FDA approvals to begin clinical trials for its products currently in development, the resources required to further develop its marketing and sales capabilities if and when those products gain approval, the resources required for any additional expansion of its corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility, and the extent to which the Company's products generate market acceptance and demand. There can be no assurance the Company will not require additional financing or will not seek to raise additional funds through bank facilities, debt or equity offerings, or other sources of capital to meet future requirements. These additional funds may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. 35 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. The responseCompany's interest income and expense are most sensitive to Item 7A is incorporated herein by reference tochanges in the information set forth undergeneral level of U.S. interest rates. In this regard, changes in U.S. interest rates affect the caption "Quantitativeinterest earned on the Company's cash equivalents of $8.3 million and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" appearingshort-term investments of $17.8 million in municipal obligations as of December 31, 2000, as well as interest paid on page 20its debt. At March 31, 2001, approximately $8 million of the annual shareholders report forCompany's debt charged interest at a variable rate. To mitigate the year ending Decemberimpact of fluctuations in U.S. interest rates, the Company generally maintains approximately 50% (approximately $4.6 million at March 31, 1999.2001) of its debt as fixed rate in nature. As a result, the Company is subject to a risk that interest rates will decrease and the Company may be unable to refinance its debt. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The report of independent auditors and consolidated financial statements included on pages 22 through 35 of the annual shareholders report for the year ended December 31, 19992000 are incorporated herein by reference. Quarterly Results of Operations on page 3736 of the annual shareholders report for the year ended December 31, 19992000 is incorporated herein by reference. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None required to be reported in thisthe Form 10-K. 3036 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. The response to Item 10, applicable to the Directors of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption "Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Commission not later than April 29, 2000.30, 2001. Information concerning executive officers is included in Part I, Item 4A of this Form 10-K. The response to Item 10, applicable to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Commission not later than April 29, 2000.30, 2001. Item 11. Executive Compensation. The response to Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation" in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Commission not later than April 30, 2000.2001. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. The response to Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the captions "Ownership of Principal Shareholders and Certain Executive Officers" and "Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Commission not later than April 29, 2000.30, 2001. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. The response to Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation" in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Commission not later than April 29, 2000. 3130, 2001. 37 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K. The following are filed as part of this report: (a) 1. Financial Statements The report of independent auditorspublic accountants and consolidated financial statements included on pages 22 through 35 of the annual shareholders report for the year ended December 31, 19992000 are incorporated herein by reference and the report of independent auditors for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1998 is set forth below. Report of Independent Auditors The Board of Directors and Shareholders CryoLife, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of CryoLife, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows of CryoLife, Inc. for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.audit. We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows of CryoLife, Inc. referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of CryoLife, Inc. at December 31, 1998, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Atlanta, GeorgiaGA February 2, 1999 2. Financial Statement Schedule Report of Independent Auditors' ReportPublic Accountants on Schedule II Schedule II-ValuationII--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts All other financial statement schedules not listed above are omitted, as the required information is not applicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes. 32 3. A. Exhibits The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference: Exhibit Number Description - - ----- --------------------- ----------- 2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement among the Company and United Cryopreservation Foundation, Inc., United Transplant Foundation, Inc. and QV, Inc. dated September 11, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.) 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 5, 1997 among Ideas for Medicine, Inc., J. Crayton Pruitt,CraytonPruitt, Sr., M.D., Thomas Benham, Thomas Alexandris, Tom Judge, Natalie Judge, Helen Wallace,J. Crayton Pruitt, Jr., M.D., and Johanna Pruitt, and CryoLife, Inc. and CryoLife Acquisition Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed8-Kfiled on March 19, 1997.) 38 Exhibit Number Description - -------- ----------- 2.3 Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Horizon Medical Products, Inc. and Ideas for Medicine, Inc. dated September 30, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Horizon Medical Products, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8K-filed8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 1998.) 2.4*+ Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 9, 2000, by and between Horizon and IFM. 3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.) 3.2 ByLaws of the Company, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.) 3.3* Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company. 4.1 Form of Certificate for the Company's Common Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 4.2 Form of Certificate for the Company's Common Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.) 33 Exhibit Number Description - - ------ --------------- 10.1 Lease, by and between New Market Partners III, Laing Properties, Inc., General Partner, as Landlord, and the Company, as Tenant, dated February 13, 1986, as amended by that Amendment to Lease, by and between the parties, dated April 7, 1986, as amended by that Amendment to Lease, by and between the parties, dated May 15, 1987, as amended by that Second Amendment to Lease, by and between the parties, dated June 22, 1988, as amended by that Third Amendment to Lease, by and between the parties, dated April 4, 1989, as amended by that Fourth Amendment to Lease, by and between the parties, dated April 4, 1989 as amended by that Fifth Amendment to Lease, by and between the parties, dated October 15, 1990. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10.1(a) Seventh Amendment to Lease dated February 13, 1986, by and between New Market Partners III, Laing Properties, Inc., General Partner, as Landlord, and the Company as tenant, dated May 15, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.) 10.2 Lease by and between Newmarket Partners I, Laing Properties, Inc. and Laing Management Company, General Partner, as Landlord, and the Company as Tenant, dated July 23, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.) 10.3 1993 Employee Stock Incentive Plan adopted on July 6, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993.) 10.4 1989 Incentive Stock Option Plan for the Company, adopted on March 23, 1989. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10.5 Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated as of April 5, 1984. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 39 Exhibit Number Description - -------- ----------- 10.6 Form of Stock Option Agreement and Grant under the Incentive Stock Option and Employee Stock Incentive Plans. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10.7 CryoLife, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan, as adopted on December 17, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10.8 Form of Supplemental Retirement Plan, by and between the Company and its Officers -- Parties to Supplemental Retirement Plans: Steven G. Anderson, David M. Fronk, GeraldSidney B. Seery,Ashmore, James C. Vander Wyk, Albert E. Heacox, Kirby S. Black, and Edwin B. Cordell, Jr.David Ashley Lee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10.9(a) Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Steven G. Anderson. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(a) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.) 34 Exhibit Number Description - - ------- ------------- 10.9(b) Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Albert E. Heacox. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7(c) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10.9(c)* Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Edwin B. Cordell, Jr. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(f) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedD. Ashley Lee, dated December 31,12, 1994.) 10.9(d) Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Gerald B. Seery. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(e) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.) 10.9(e) Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and James C. Vander Wyk, Ph.D. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(f) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.) 10.9(f)10.9(e) Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Kirby S. Black, Ph.D. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(g) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.) 10.9(g)10.9(f) Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and David M. Fronk. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(g) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.) 10.10 Form of Secrecy and Noncompete Agreement, by and between the Company and its Officers. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10.11*10.11 Terms of Agreement Between Bruce J. Van Dyne, M.D. and CryoLife, Inc. dated November 1, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.) 10.12 Technology Acquisition Agreement between the Company and Nicholas Kowanko, Ph.D., dated March 14, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.) 40 Exhibit Number Description - -------- ----------- 10.13 Option Agreement, by and between the Company and Duke University, dated July 9, 1990, as amended by that Option Agreement Extension, by and between the parties, dated July 9, 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10.14 Research and License Agreement by and between Medical University of South Carolina and CryoLife dated November 15, 1985, as amended by Amendment to the Research and License Agreement dated February 25, 1986 by and between the parties and an Addendum to Research and License Agreement by and between the parties, dated March 4, 1986. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 35 Exhibit Number Description - - ------ -------------- 10.15 CryoLife, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Appendix 2 to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 1998.) 10.16 Lease Agreement between the Company and Amli Land Development-IDevelopment--I Limited Partnership, dated April 18, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.) 10.16(a)* First Amendment to Lease Agreement Agreement, dated April 18, 1995, between the Company and Amli Land Development-IDevelopment--I Limited Partnership dated August 6, 1999. 10.17 Funding Agreement between the Company and Amli Land Development-I Limited Partnership dated April 18, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2810.16(a) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.1999.) 10.16(b)* Restatement and Amendment to Funding Agreement between the Company and Amli Land Development- I Limited Partnership, dated August 6, 1999. 10.18 CryoLife, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit "A" of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 1996.) 10.19 Noncompetition Agreement between the Company and United Cryopreservation Foundation, Inc. dated September 11,1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.) 10.210.20 Noncompetition Agreement between the Company and QV, Inc. dated September 11, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.) 10.21 RevolvingTermRevolving Term Loan Facility between the Company and NationsBank N.A., dated August 30, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.) 10.22 Technology License Agreement between the Company and Colorado State University Research Foundation dated March 28, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996.) 10.23 Noncompetition Agreement between the Company and United Transplant Foundation, Inc. dated September 11, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.) 10.24(a)* Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between CryoLife, Inc, as Borrower and NationsBank, N.A., as Lender, dated August 30, 1996. 10.24(b) First Amendment of Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement between CryoLife, Inc., as Borrower and NationsBank, N.A. (South), as Lender, dated April 14, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.) 10.24(c)10.24(b) Second Modification of Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated December 16, 1997 by and between the Registrant and NationsBank, N.A. . (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32(b)4.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.) 3641 Exhibit Number Description - - -------- ----------------- 10.24(d)* Third Modification of Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated June 12, 1998 by and between the Registrant and NationsBank, N.A. 10.24(e)*----------- 10.24 Fourth Modification of Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated December 16, 1997 by and between the Company and Bank of America, N.A. and First Modification of Revolving Note dated December 31, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999) 10.25 Reserved. 10.26 CryoLife, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Appendix 2 to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 1998.) 10.27 Consulting Agreement dated March 5, 1997 between CryoLife Acquisition Corporation and J. Crayton Pruitt, Sr., M.D. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997.) 10.28 Subordinated Convertible Debenture dated March 5, 1997 between the Company and J. Crayton Pruitt, Sr., M.D. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997.) 10.29 Lease Agreement dated March 5, 1997 between the Company and J. Crayton Pruitt, Sr., M.D. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997.) 10.30 Lease Guaranty dated March 5, 1997 between J. Crayton Pruitt Family Trust U/T/A and CryoLife, Inc., as Guarantor for CryoLife Acquisition Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997.) 10.310.31 Form of Non-Competition Agreement dated March 5, 1997 between the Company and J. Crayton Pruitt, Sr., M.D., Thomas Benham, Thomas Alexandris, Tom Judge, Natalie Judge, Helen Wallace, J. Crayton Pruitt, Jr., M.D., and Johanna Pruitt. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997.) 10.32*10.32 Standard Form of Agreements Between Owner and Design/Builder by and between the Company and Choate Design and Build Company dated January 19, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999) 10.33 Construction Loan and Permanent Financing Agreement with Bank of America dated April 25, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000.) 10.34* Sublease Agreement between Horizon and IFM, dated October 9, 2000. 10.35* Terms of Agreement between Ronald C. Elkins, MD and CryoLife, Inc., dated November 7, 2000. 10.36* Rights Agreement between the Company and Chemical Mellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent, dated as of November 27, 1995. 10.37* International Distribution Agreement, dated September 17, 1998, between the Company and Century Medical, Inc. 13.1* Portions of the Registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 19992000 which are incorporated by reference herein. 21.1* Subsidiaries of CryoLife, Inc. 23.1* Consent of Arthur Andersen LLPLLP. 23.2* Consent of Ernst & Young LLP 27.1* Financial Data Schedule ________________________________LLP. - --------------------- * Filed herewith. 37+ In accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the schedules and certain exhibits have been omitted and a list of the schedules and exhibits is at the end of the Exhibit. The Registrant will furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the Commission upon request. 42 3.B.3. B. Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements. 1. 1993 Employee Stock Incentive Plan adopted on July 6, 1993. (Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.) 2. 1989 Incentive Stock Option Plan for the Company, adopted on March 23, 1989 (Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 3. Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated as of April 5, 1984 (Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 4. Form of Stock Option Agreement and Grant under the Incentive Stock Option and Employee Stock Incentive Plans (Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 5. CryoLife, Inc. Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan, as adopted on December 17, 1991 (Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 6. Form of Supplemental Retirement Plan, by and between the Company and its Officers --Officers-- Parties to Supplemental Retirement Plans: Steven G. Anderson, Robert T. McNally, Gerald B. Seery, James C. Vander Wyk, Albert E. Heacox, Kirby S. Black and Edwin B. Cordell, Jr. (Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 7. Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Steven G. Anderson. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(a) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.) 8. Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and David M. Fronk. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(g) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.) 9. Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Albert E. Heacox. (Exhibit 10.7(c) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-56388).) 10. Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Gerald B. Seery. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(e) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.) 11. Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and James C. Vander Wyk, Ph.D. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(f) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.) 12. Employment Agreement, by and between the Company and Edwin B. Cordell, Jr. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(f) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.)D. Ashley Lee. 13. CryoLife, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to this form 10-K.the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.) 14. CryoLife, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit "A" of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 1996.) 15. Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Kirby S. Black (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9(g) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.) 16. CryoLife, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (Exhibit(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to thisthe Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K).10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.) 17. Terms of Agreement Between Bruce J. Van Dyne, M.D. and CryoLife, Inc., dated November 1, 1999. 38 18. Terms of Agreement between Ronald C. Elkins, MD and CryoLife, Inc., dated November 7, 2000. (b) Reports on Form 8-K 1. The Registrant filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with respect to the change in its Independent Auditors with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 1999. 2. The Registrant filed a Current Report on Form 8-K/A with respect to the change in its Independent Auditors with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9, 1999. 39NONE. 43 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. CRYOLIFE, INC. March 27, 2000April 2, 2001 By /s/ Steven/S/ STEVEN G. Anderson -----------------------------------------ANDERSON -------------------------------------- Steven G. Anderson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date ------------- ---------- ------- /s/ StevenSTEVEN G. AndersonANDERSON President, Chief Executive Officer March 27, 2000April 2, 2001 - - ------------------------------------------------------ and Chairman of the Board of Directors Steven G. Anderson Directors (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Edwin B. Cordell, Jr.D. ASHLEY LEE Vice President and Chief Financial March 27, 2000April 2, 2001 - - ------------------------------------------------------- Officer (Principal Financial and Edwin B. Cordell, Jr.D. Ashley Lee Accounting Officer) /s/ RonaldRONALD D. McCallMCCALL Director March 27, 2000April 2, 2001 - - ------------------------------------------------------- Ronald D. McCall /s/ Benjamin H. GRAYVIRGINIA C. LACY Director March 27, 2000April 2, 2001 - - ------------------------ Benjamin H. Gray /s/ Virginia C. Lacy Director March 27, 2000 - - ------------------------------------------------------- Virginia C. Lacy /s/ Ronald Charles Elkins,RONALD CHARLES ELKINS, M.D. Director March 27, 2000April 2, 2001 - - --------------------------------------------------------------- Ronald Charles Elkins, M.D. /s/ Bruce j. Van dyne, M.D.JOHN M. COOK Director March 27, 2000April 2, 2001 - - -------------------------------- Bruce J. Van Dyne, M.D. /s/------------------------------- John M. Cook Director March 27, 2000 - - -------------------------- John M. Cook /s/ Alexander C. Schwartz, jr. Director March 27, 2000 - - ------------------------ Alexander C. Schwartz, Jr.
4044 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To CryoLife, Inc. We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements included in CryoLife, Inc.'s 19992000 annual report to stockholders and this Form 10-K and have issued our report thereon dated February 7, 2000.2001. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in Item 14(a)14 of this Form 10-K is the responsibility of the Company's management, is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules, and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. ARTHUR ANDERSEN,/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP Atlanta, Georgia February 7, 20002001 S-1 1216257v1 1217270v3 SCHEDULE II CRYOLIFE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, and 19971998
Balance beginning Balance end of Description of period Additions Deductions period - - ---------------------------------------------Period ----------- ----------------- --------- ---------- --------------- Year ended December 31, 2000 Allowance for doubtful accounts........... $ 528,000 $21,000 $464,000 $85,000 Deferred preservation costs............... 151,000 230,000 152,000 229,000 Year ended December 31, 1999 Allowance for doubtful accounts........... $ 256,000 $521,000 $249,000 $528,000 Deferred preservation costs............... 53,000 235,000 137,000 151,000 Year ended December 31, 1998 Allowance for doubtful accounts........... $ 103,000 $171,000$ 171,000 $ 18,000 $256,000 Deferred preservation costs............... 152,000 -- 99,000 53,000 Year ended December 31, 1997 Allowance for doubtful accounts........... $ 94,000 $ 46,000 $ 37,000 $103,000256,000 Deferred preservation costs............... 278,000152,000 -- 126,000 152,00099,000 53,000
S-2 1345392