UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K
FORM ________________________________________10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021


or
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                     to                     
Commission file number 001-12658
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia54-1692118
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)
4250 Congress Street, Suite 900
Charlotte,, North Carolina28209
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (980(980) - 299-5700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered
COMMON STOCK, $.01 Par ValueALBNew York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes      No  
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes   No  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.    Yes      No  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes      No  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   No  
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $7.5$19.7 billion based on the last reported sale price of common stock on June 30, 2019,2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter.
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 18, 2020: 106,206,15711, 2022: 117,036,615
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of Albemarle Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Index to Form 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Page
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Index to Form 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2019




PART I


Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
PART I
Item 1.Business.

Albemarle Corporation was incorporated in Virginia in 1993. Our principal executive offices are located at 4250 Congress Street, Suite 900, Charlotte, North Carolina 28209. Unless the context otherwise indicates, the terms “Albemarle,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “the Company” mean Albemarle Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We are a leading global developer, manufacturer and marketer of highly-engineered specialty chemicals that are designed to meet our customers’ needs across a diverse range of end markets. We believe ourOur corporate purpose is making the world safe and sustainable by powering the potential of people. The end markets we serve include energy storage, petroleum refining, consumer electronics, construction, automotive, lubricants, pharmaceuticals and crop protection and custom chemistry services.protection. We believe that our commercial and geographic diversity, technical expertise, access to high-quality resources, innovative capability, flexible, low-cost global manufacturing base, experienced management team and strategic focus on our core base technologies will enable us to maintain leading positions in those areas of the specialty chemicals industry in which we operate.
We and our joint ventures currently operate 29more than 25 production and research and development (“R&D”) facilities, as well as a number of administrative and sales offices, around the world. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we served approximately 2,4002,100 customers, none of which individually represents more than 10% of net sales of the Company, in approximately 7570 countries. For information regarding our unconsolidated joint ventures see Note 10, “Investments,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
On February 5, 2020, the Company announced that Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Luke Kissam had advised the Board of Directors that he will retire from his roles as an officer and director of Albemarle effective June 2020, for health reasons. The Board of Directors will be conducting a comprehensive search process, which will include internal and external candidates.
Business Segments
During 2019,2021, we managed and reported our operations under three reportable segments: Lithium, Bromine Specialties and Catalysts. Each segment has a dedicated team of sales, research and development, process engineering, manufacturing and sourcing, and business strategy personnel and has full accountability for improving execution through greater asset efficiency, market focus, agility and responsiveness. Financial results and discussion about our segments included in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport are organized according to these categories except where noted.
For financial information regarding our reportable segments and geographic area information, see Note 25, “Segment and Geographic Area Information,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Lithium Segment
Our Lithium business develops lithium-based materials for a wide range of industries and end markets. We are a low-cost producer of one of the most diverse product portfolios of lithium derivatives in the industry.
We develop and manufacture a broad range of basic lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and value-added lithium specialties and reagents, including butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride. Lithium is a key component in products and processes used in a variety of applications and industries, which include lithium batteries used in consumer electronics and electric vehicles, high performance greases, thermoplastic elastomers for car tires, rubber soles and plastic bottles, catalysts for chemical reactions, organic synthesis processes in the areas of steroid chemistry and vitamins, various life science applications, as well as intermediates in the pharmaceutical industry, among other applications. We also develop and manufacture cesium products for the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, and zirconium, barium and titanium products for various pyrotechnical applications, including airbag initiators.
In addition to developing and supplying lithium compounds, we provide technical services, including the handling and use of reactive lithium products. We also offer our customers recycling services for lithium-containing by-products resulting from synthesis with organolithium products, lithium metal and other reagents. We plan to continue to focus on the development of new products and applications.
Competition
The global lithium market consists of producers primarily located in the Americas, Asia and Australia. Major competitors in lithium compounds include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A., Sichuan Tianqi Lithium, Jiangxi Ganfeng Lithium and Livent Corporation. In the cesium and other specialty metal business, key competitors include Sinomine and Sigma-Aldrich
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Corporation. Competition in the global lithium market is largely based on product quality, product diversity, reliability of supply and customer service.
Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts
We obtain lithium through solar evaporation of our ponds at the Salar de Atacama, in Chile, and in Silver Peak, Nevada. After we obtain the lithium brine from the Salar de Atacama, we process it into lithium carbonate and lithium chloride at a plant in nearby La Negra, Chile. The lithium brine from our Silver Peak site is processed into lithium carbonate at our plant in Silver Peak. Subsequently, in other locations in the United States (“U.S.”), Germany, France and Taiwan, we further process the materials into various derivatives, depending on the markets we serve. In addition, we own undeveloped land with access to a lithium resource in Antofalla, within the Catamarca Province of Argentina. If necessary, we can also obtain lithium from other sources.
Our mineral rights with respect to the Salar de Atacama in Chile consist exclusively of our right to access lithium brine, covering an area of approximately 16,700 hectares, pursuant to a long-term contract with the Chilean government, originally entered into in January 1975 by one of our predecessors and subsequently amended and restated. The amended agreement provides us with sufficient lithium to produce over 80,000 metric tons annually of technical and battery-grade lithium salts over the next 24 years at our expanding battery-grade manufacturing facilities in La Negra, Chile. In addition, the amended agreement provides for commission payments to the Chilean government based on sales price/metric ton, our support of research and development in Chile in lithium applications and solar energy, and our support of local communities in Northern Chile.
Our mineral rights in Silver Peak, Nevada consist of our right to access lithium brine pursuant to our permitted and certified senior water rights, a settlement agreement with the U.S. government, originally entered into in June 1991, and our patented and unpatented land claims. Pursuant to the 1991 agreement, our water rights and our land claims, we have rights to all lithium that we can remove economically from the Clayton Valley Basin in Nevada. We have been operating at the Silver Peak site since 1966. Our Silver Peak site covers a surface of over 13,500 acres, 10,826 acres of which we own through a subsidiary. The remaining acres are owned by the U.S. government from whom we lease the land pursuant to unpatented land claims that are renewed annually. Based on our 2019 production levels, we believe that the amount of lithium brine we can economically obtain from our Silver Peak, Nevada site pursuant to our rights could support the current levels of lithium carbonate production for approximately 20 years. Assuming certain operating conditions are satisfied, our annual lithium carbonate production capacity is estimated to be at least 6,000 metric tons at our Silver Peak facility. However, no assurance can be given that the indicated levels of production of lithium carbonate at either Silver Peak or La Negra will be realized.
We also obtain lithium through hard rock mining via our 49% interest in Windfield Holdings Pty. Ltd., which directly owns 100% of the equity of Talison Lithium Pty. Ltd., a company incorporated in Australia (“Talison”). Talison, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns and operates a lithium mine in Greenbushes, Western Australia and mines lithium ore, which is then milled and processed to separate lithium concentrate from the rest of the ore. Talison currently sells the lithium concentrate only to its shareholders. Talison has a leading position in two categories of lithium concentrates: (i) technical-grade lithium concentrates which have low iron content for use in the manufacture of glass, ceramics and heat-proof cookware; and (ii) a high-yielding chemical-grade lithium concentrate, used to produce lithium chemicals which form the basis for the manufacture of lithium-ion batteries for laptop computers, mobile phones, electric bicycles and electric vehicles. Albemarle’s share of the chemical-grade lithium concentrate is processed into battery-grade lithium hydroxide at our Jiangxi and Sichuan, China facilities, and lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide at our tolling partners in China. Following the completion of a chemical-grade concentrate expansion in 2019, Talison’s annual lithium carbonate equivalent production capacity is approximately 160,000 metric tons, along with annual production capacity for 10,000 metric tons of technical-grade lithium concentrate, of which Albemarle’s production share is 50 percent. However, no assurance can be given that the indicated levels of production of lithium concentrate at Talison will be realized.
On October 31, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in Mineral Resources Limited’s (“MRL”) Wodgina hard rock lithium mine project (“Wodgina Project”) in Western Australia and formed an unincorporated joint venture with MRL, named MARBL Lithium Joint Venture, for the exploration, development, mining, processing and production of lithium and other minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) from the Wodgina Project and for the operation of the Kemerton lithium hydroxide conversion assets. Based on current market conditions, MARBL Lithium Joint Venture will idle production of spodumene until market demand supports bringing the mine back into production. The Kemerton plant is currently scheduled to be commissioned in stages during the first half of 2021, with an initial lithium hydroxide conversion capacity of 50,000 metric tons.
3

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Bromine Specialties Segment
Our bromine and bromine-based business includes products used in fire safety solutions and other specialty chemicals applications. Our fire safety technology enables the use of plastics in high performance, high heat applications by enhancing the flame resistant properties of these materials. End market products that benefit from our fire safety technology include plastic enclosures for consumer electronics, printed circuit boards, wire and cable products, electrical connectors, textiles and foam insulation. Our bromine-based business also includes specialty chemicals products such as elemental bromine, alkyl bromides, inorganic bromides, brominated powdered activated carbon and a number of bromine fine chemicals. These specialty products are used in chemical synthesis, oil and gas well drilling and completion fluids, mercury control, water purification, beef and poultry processing and various other industrial applications. Other specialty chemicals that we produce include tertiary amines for surfactants, biocides, and disinfectants and sanitizers. A number of customers of our bromine business operate in cyclical industries, including the consumer electronics and oil field industries. As a result, demand from our customers in such industries is also cyclical.
Competition
Our bromine business serves markets in the Americas, Asia, Europe and the Middle East, each of which is highly competitive. Product performance and quality, price and contract terms are the primary factors in determining which qualified supplier is awarded a contract. Research and development, product and process improvements, specialized customer services, the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel and maintenance of a good safety record have also been important factors to compete effectively in the marketplace. Our most significant competitors are Lanxess AG and Israel Chemicals Ltd.
Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts
We obtain lithium through solar evaporation of our ponds at the Salar de Atacama, in Chile, and in Silver Peak, Nevada, and by purchasing lithium concentrate from our 49%-owned joint venture, Windfield Holdings Pty. Ltd. (“Windfield”), which directly owns 100% of the equity of Talison Lithium Pty. Ltd., a company incorporated in Australia (“Talison”). In 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in Mineral Resources Limited’s (“MRL”) Wodgina hard rock lithium mine project (“Wodgina Project”) in Western Australia and formed an unincorporated joint venture with MRL, named MARBL Lithium Joint Venture (“MARBL”), for the exploration, development, mining, processing and production of lithium and other minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) from the Wodgina Project and for the operation of the Kemerton, Australia lithium hydroxide conversion assets. Upon acquisition, we idled MARBL’s production of spodumene until market demand supported bringing the mine back into production. In October 2021, MARBL announced its intention to resume spodumene concentrate production at this site, with the production restart expected during the second quarter of 2022. In addition, we hold mineral rights in defined areas of Kings Mountain, North Carolina with available lithium resources and we own undeveloped land with access to a lithium resource in Antofalla, within the Catamarca Province of Argentina. If necessary, we can also obtain lithium from other sources. See Item 2. Properties, for additional disclosures of our lithium mineral properties.
Bromine Segment
During 2021, we changed the name of our Bromine Specialties segment to Bromine. This change simplifies the name of the reportable segment, and does not impact the operations of the business or disclosure of the related assets. Our bromine and bromine-based business includes products used in fire safety solutions and other specialty chemicals applications. Our fire safety technology enables the use of plastics in high performance, high heat applications by enhancing the flame resistant properties of these materials. End market products that benefit from our fire safety technology include plastic enclosures for consumer electronics, printed circuit boards, wire and cable products, electrical connectors, textiles and foam insulation. Our bromine-based business also includes specialty chemicals products such as elemental bromine, alkyl bromides, inorganic bromides, brominated powdered activated carbon and a number of bromine fine chemicals. These specialty products are used in chemical synthesis, oil and gas well drilling and completion fluids, mercury control, water purification, beef and poultry processing and various other industrial applications. Other specialty chemicals that we produce include tertiary amines for surfactants, biocides, and disinfectants and sanitizers. A number of customers of our bromine business operate in cyclical industries, including the consumer electronics and oil field industries. As a result, demand from our customers in such industries is also cyclical.
Competition
Our bromine business serves markets in the Americas, Asia, Europe and the Middle East, each of which is highly competitive. Product performance and quality, price and contract terms are the primary factors in determining which qualified supplier is awarded a contract. Research and development, product and process improvements, specialized customer services, the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel and maintenance of a good safety record have also been important factors to compete effectively in the marketplace. Our most significant competitors are Lanxess AG and Israel Chemicals Ltd.
Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts
The bromine we use is originally sourced from two locations: Arkansas and the Dead Sea. Our bromine production operations in Arkansas are supported by an active brine rights leasing program. We estimate that, at current production levels, we will be able to produce bromine in Arkansas for decades. In addition, through our 50% interest in Jordan Bromine Company Limited (“JBC”), a consolidated joint venture established in 1999, with operations in Safi, Jordan, we sourceacquire bromine that is originally sourced from the Dead Sea, which is believed to have indefinite quantitiesSea. JBC processes the bromine at its facilities into a variety of brine.end products. See Item 2. Properties, regarding additional disclosures for our mineral properties.
Catalysts Segment
Our three main product lines in this segment are (i) Clean Fuels Technologies (“CFT”), which is primarily composed of hydroprocessing catalysts (“HPC”) together with isomerization and akylation catalysts; (ii) fluidized catalytic cracking (“FCC”) catalysts and additives; and (iii) performance catalyst solutions (“PCS”), which is primarily composed of organometallics and curatives.
We offer a wide range of HPC products, which are applied throughout the oil refining industry. Their application enables the upgrading of oil fractions to clean fuels and other usable oil feedstocks and products by removing sulfur, nitrogen and other impurities from the feedstock. In addition, they improve product properties by adding hydrogen and in some cases improve the performance of downstream catalysts and processes. We continuously seek to add more value to refinery operations by offering HPC products that meet our customers’ requirements for profitability and performance in the very demanding refining market.
4

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We provide our customers with customized FCC catalyst systems. FCC catalystssystems, which assist in the high yield cracking of refinery petroleum streams into derivative, higher-value products such as transportation fuels and petrochemical feedstocks like propylene. Our FCC additives are used to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide in FCC units and to increase liquefied petroleum gas olefins yield, such as propylene, and to boost octane in gasoline. Albemarle offers unique refinery catalysts to crack and treat the lightest to the heaviest feedstocks while meeting refinery yield and product needs.
Within our PCS product line, we manufacture organometallic co-catalysts (e.g., aluminum, magnesium and zinc alkyls) used in the manufacture of alpha-olefins (i.e.(e.g., hexene, octene, decene), polyolefins (polyethylene(e.g., polyethylene and polypropylene) and electronics. Our curatives include a range of curing agents used in polyurethanes, epoxies and other engineered resins.
There were more than 600 refineries world-wide in 2019. Over the long-term, we2021. We expect to continue to see some less profitable, typically smaller, refineries shutting down and, over the long-term, being replaced by larger scale and more complex refineries, with growth concentrated in the Middle East and Asia. Oil refining has again increased moderatelyrefinery utilization was lower in 2021 and 2020 compared to the previous year.prior years, with most refineries cutting throughput due to the reduction in demand resulting from global travel restrictions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. We estimate that there are currently approximately 600 FCC units being operated globally, each of which requires a constant supply of FCC catalysts. In addition, we estimate that there are approximately 3,000 HPC units being operated globally, or a capacity of approximately 46 million barrels per day, each of which typically requires replacement HPC catalysts once every one to four years.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Competition
Our Catalysts segment serves the global market including the Americas, Asia, Europe and the Middle East, each of which is highly competitive. Competition in these markets is driven by a variety factors. Product performance and quality, price and contract terms, product and process improvements, specialized customer services, the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel, and the maintenance of a good safety record are the primary factors to compete effectively in the catalysts marketplace. In addition, through our research and development programs, we strive to differentiate our business by developing value-added products and products based on proprietary technologies.
Our major competitors in the CFT catalysts market include Shell Catalysts & Technologies, Advanced Refining Technologies and Haldor Topsoe. Our major competitors in the FCC catalysts market include W.R. Grace & Co., BASF Corporation and China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec). In the PCS market, our major competitors include Nouryon, Lanxess AG and Lonza.Arxada.
Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts
The major raw materials we use in our Catalysts operations include sodium silicate, sodium aluminate, kaolin, aluminum, ethylene, alpha-olefins, isobutylene, toluene and rare earths and metals, such as lanthanum, molybdenum, nickel and cobalt, most of which are readily available from numerous independent suppliers and are purchased or provided under contracts at prices we believe are competitive. The cost of raw materials is generally based on market prices, although we may use contracts with price caps or other tools, as appropriate, to mitigate price volatility.
Human Capital
Our main human capital management objectives are to attract, retain and develop the highest quality talent and ensure they feel safe, supported and empowered to do the best work they can do. We believe providing a diverse, equal and inclusive workplace facilitates opportunities for innovation, fosters good decision making practices, and promotes employee engagement and high productivity across our organization.
As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately 6,000 employees, including employees of our consolidated joint ventures, of whom 2,600, or 43%, are employed in the U.S. and the Americas; 1,600, or 27%, are employed in Asia Pacific; 1,400, or 23%, are employed in Europe; and 400, or 7%, are employed in the Middle East or other areas. Approximately 46% of these employees are represented by unions or works councils. We believe that we generally have a good relationship with our employees, and with those unions and works councils.
Health and Safety
The health and safety of our employees is a part of our core values at Albemarle and is integral to how we conduct business. Our employees, contractors, and visitors follow a comprehensive set of written health and safety policies and procedures at both the corporate and local site levels. We routinely audit ourselves against our policies, procedures and standards, using internal and third-party resources. We also include health and safety metrics in our annual incentive plan for all employees to incentivize our commitment to safety. In 2021, we improved our Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”) occupational injury and illness incident rate to 0.19 for our employees and nested contractors, compared to 0.26 in 2020. In
5

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
addition, we provide all employees and their dependents with access to our Employee Assistance Program which provides free mental and behavioral health resources.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Albemarle’s cross-functional Global Response Team continues to meet regularly to address employee health and safety and operational challenges. Our first priority is always the health and well-being of our employees, customers, and communities. Since the start of the pandemic, our focus has shifted from managing an immediate crisis to building in the flexibility needed to adjust for regional differences and changing conditions. Protocols that include restricted travel, shift adjustments, increased hygiene, and social distancing for the essential workers at our plants have been put in place at all locations. In some regions, employees are able to return to their work sites. Other regions, including most of North and South America, remain on work-from-home protocols for non-essential personnel.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
In 2020, we hired a Vice President, Diversity and Inclusion, to accelerate our inclusion and diversity initiatives and deliver meaningful change in our global organization. Our primary focus in our recruiting efforts is to drive greater diversity in our workforce, including higher representation in the professional and managerial job categories. We want to ensure that our workplace reflects the communities in which we live and work. Our recruiting policy includes a requirement that we include individuals from gender or racial minority groups among those we interview for openings at the manager level and above.
We seek to provide employees with a desirable workplace that will enable us to attract and retain top talent. We believe employees should be compensated through wages and benefits, based on experience, expertise, performance, and the criticality of their roles in the Company. We also perform an annual review of our pay practices to ensure that they are fair and equitable, and not influenced by biased opinions or discrimination. In addition, we have established employee groups, known as Connect groups, to promote an atmosphere of inclusion and encouragement in which every employee’s voice can be heard. These Connect groups provide opportunities for employees to share their backgrounds, experiences, and beliefs, and to use them to benefit others through mentoring and volunteering in the local community, among other activities.
Investment in Talent
Investing in talent is a critical process for Albemarle because it allows us to be proactive and anticipate key organizational needs for talent and capabilities. This enables us to efficiently and effectively ensure that we have the right talent pipeline to drive Albemarle’s success into the future. We also provide leadership development through performance coaching, 360-degree feedback, plant training including health, safety and environmental, and experiential development and mentoring. Our leadership development is a cornerstone to our talent management strategy.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
We have an international strategic account program that uses cross-functional teams to serve large global customers. This program emphasizes creative strategies to improve and strengthen strategic customer relationships with emphasis on creating value for customers and promoting post-sale service. Complementing this program are regional Albemarle sales and technical personnel around the world who serve numerous additional customers globally. We also utilize commissioned sales representatives and specialists in specific market areas when necessary or required by law.
Research and Development
We believe that in order to generate revenue growth, maintain our margins and remain competitive, we must continually invest in research and development, product and process improvements and specialized customer services. Our research and development efforts support each of our business segments. The objective of our research and development efforts is to develop innovative chemistries and technologies with applications relevant within targeted key markets through both process and new product development. Through research and development, we continue to seek increased margins by introducing value-added products and proprietary processes and innovative green chemistry technologies. Our green chemistry efforts focus on the development of products in a manner that minimizes waste and the use of raw materials and energy, avoids the use of toxic reagents and solvents and utilizes safe, environmentally friendly manufacturing processes. Green chemistry is encouraged with our researchers through periodic focus group discussions and special rewards and recognition for outstanding new green developments.
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property, including our patents, licenses and trade names, is an important component of our business. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we owned approximately 2,100more than 2,000 active patents and approximately 550more than 450 pending patent applications in key
6

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
strategic markets worldwide. We also have acquired rights under patents and inventions of others through licenses, and we license certain patents and inventions to third parties.
Regulation
Our business is subject to a broad array of employee health and safety laws and regulations, including those under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”).OSHA. We also are subject to similar state laws and regulations as well as local laws and regulations for our non-U.S. operations. We devote significant resources and have developed and implemented comprehensive programs to promote the health and safety of our employees and we maintain an active health, safety and environmental program. WeAs noted above, we finished 20192021 with an OSHA occupational injury and illness incident rate of 0.350.19 for Albemarle employees and nested contractors, compared to 0.580.26 in 2018.2020.
Our business and our customers are subject to significant requirements under the European Community Regulation for the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (“REACH”). REACH imposes obligations on European Union manufacturers and importers of chemicals and other products into the European Union to compile and file comprehensive reports, including testing data, on each chemical substance, and perform chemical safety assessments.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Additionally, substances of high concern, as defined under REACH, are subject to an authorization process. Authorization may result in restrictions in the use of products by application or even banning the product. REACH regulations impose significant additional responsibilities on chemical producers, importers, downstream users of chemical substances and preparations, and the entire supply chain. Our significant manufacturing presence and sales activities in the European Union require significant compliance costs and may result in increases in the costs of raw materials we purchase and the products we sell. Increases in the costs of our products could result in a decrease in their overall demand; additionally, customers may seek products that are not regulated by REACH,with lower regulatory compliance requirements, which could also result in a decrease in the demand of certain products subject to the REACH regulations.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”), as amended in June 2016, requires chemicals to be assessed against a risk-based safety standard and calling for the elimination of unreasonable risks identified during risk evaluation. This regulation and other pending initiatives at the U.S. state level, as well as initiatives in Canada, Asia and other regions, will potentially require toxicological testing and risk assessments of a wide variety of chemicals, including chemicals used or produced by us. These assessments may result in heightened concerns about the chemicals involved and additional requirements being placed on the production, handling, labeling or use of the subject chemicals. Such concerns and additional requirements could also increase the cost incurred by our customers to use our chemical products and otherwise limit the use of these products, which could lead to a decrease in demand for these products.
Historically, there has been scrutiny of certain brominated flame retardants by regulatory authorities, legislative bodies and environmental interest groups in various countries. We manufacture a broad range of brominated flame retardant products, which are used in a variety of applications. Concern about the impact of some of our products on human health or the environment may lead to regulation or reaction in our markets independent of regulation.
Environmental Regulation
We are subject to numerous foreign, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated properties. Ongoing compliance with such laws and regulations is an important consideration for us. Key aspects of our operations are subject to these laws and regulations. In addition, we incur substantial capital and operating costs in our efforts to comply with them.
We use and generate hazardous substances and wastes in our operations and may become subject to claims for personal injury and/or property damage relating to the release of such substances into the environment. In addition, some of our current properties are, or have been, used for industrial purposes, which could contain currently unknown contamination that could expose us to governmental requirements or claims relating to environmental remediation, personal injury and/or property damage. Liabilities associated with the investigation and cleanup of hazardous substances, as well as personal injury, property damages or natural resource damages arising from the release of, or exposure to, such hazardous substances, may be imposed in many situations without regard to violations of laws or regulations or other fault, and may also be imposed jointly and severally (so that a responsible party may be held liable for more than its share of the losses involved, or even the entire loss). Such liabilities also may be imposed on many different entities with a relationship to the hazardous substances at issue, including, for example, entities that formerly owned or operated the property affected by the hazardous substances and entities that arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances at the affected property, as well as entities that currently own or operate such property. We are subject to such laws, including the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as CERCLA or Superfund, in the U.S., and similar foreign and state laws. We may have
7

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
liability as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) with respect to active off-site locations under CERCLA or state equivalents. We have sought to resolve our liability as a PRP at these sites through indemnification by third parties and settlements, which would provide for payment of our allocable share of remediation costs. Because the cleanup costs are estimates and are subject to revision as more information becomes available about the extent of remediation required, and in some cases we have asserted a defense to any liability, our estimates could change. Moreover, liability under CERCLA and equivalent state statutes may be joint and several, which could require us to pay in excess of our pro rata share of remediation costs. Our understanding of the financial strength of other PRPs has been considered, where appropriate, in estimating our liabilities. Accruals for these matters are included in the environmental reserve. Our management is actively involved in evaluating environmental matters and, based on information currently available to us, we have concluded that our outstanding environmental liabilities for unresolved waste sites currently known to us should not have a material effect on our operations.
See “Safety and Environmental Matters” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further details.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Climate Change and Natural Resources
The growing concerns about climate change and the related increasingly stringent regulations may provide us with new or expanded business opportunities. We provide solutions to companies pursuing alternative fuel products and technologies (such as renewable fuels), emission control technologies (including mercury emissions), alternative transportation vehicles and energy storage technologies and other similar solutions. As demand for, and legislation mandating or incentivizing the use of, alternative fuel technologies that limit or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions increase, we continue to monitor the market and offer solutions where we have appropriate technology and believe we are well positioned to take advantage of opportunities that may arise from such demand or legislation.
In addition to potential business opportunities, we acknowledge our responsibility to address the impact of our operations on the environment. We are investing in technology and people to reduce energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and air emissions of ozone-depleting substances. In 2021, we established greenhouse gas emission targets for each of our businesses, including achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050, reducing the carbon-intensity of our Bromine and Catalysts businesses by a combined 35% by 2030, and growing our Lithium business in a carbon-intensity neutral manner through 2030.
Water is a critical input to Albemarle’s production operations. As water is a scarce resource, we understand the need to responsibly manage our water consumption not only for the preservation of the environment, but for the viability of our local communities. We are investing in new process technologies to reduce our water footprint and expand capacity sustainably in locations with high water risk. Our goal is to reduce our intensity of freshwater usage by 25% by 2030 in areas of high or extremely high-water risk, such as Chile and Jordan, as defined by the World Resources Institute.
Our businesses are dependent on the availability and responsible management of natural resources. We manage our natural resources to operate efficiently and preserve the environment for our local communities and the world. Our natural resource management includes mineral resource transparency with local communities, governments, regulators and other key stakeholders, as well as partnering with the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance for our lithium production for the assurance of responsible mining. We attempt to maximize the recovery of our extracted minerals and recycle or reuse by-products where possible. In addition, we work with local communities, regulatory agencies and wildlife organizations to preserve and restore land and biodiversity before, during and after all operations commence.
Recent Acquisitions, Joint Ventures and Divestitures
During recent years, we have devoted resources to acquisitions and joint ventures, including the subsequent integration of acquired businesses. These acquisitions and joint ventures have expanded our base business, provided our customers with a wider array of products and presented new alternatives for discovery through additional chemistries. In addition, we have pursued opportunities to divest businesses which do not fit our high priority business growth profile. Following is a summary of our significant acquisitions, joint ventures and divestitures over the last three years.
On September 30, 2021, the Company signed a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity of Guangxi Tianyuan New Energy Materials Co., Ltd. (“Tianyuan”), for approximately $200 million in cash. Tianyuan's operations include a recently constructed lithium processing plant strategically positioned near the Port of Qinzhou in Guangxi, China. The plant has designed annual conversion capacity of up to 25,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) and is capable of producing battery-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide. The plant is currently in the commissioning stage and is expected to begin commercial production in the first half of 2022. The Company expects the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, to close in the first half of 2022.
8

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
On June 1, 2021, we completed the sale of our fine chemistry services (“FCS”) business to W. R. Grace & Co. (“Grace”) for proceeds of approximately $570 million, consisting of $300 million in cash and the issuance to Albemarle of preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary having an aggregate stated value of $270 million. As part of the transaction, Grace acquired our manufacturing facilities located in South Haven, Michigan and Tyrone, Pennsylvania.
In the fourth quarter of 2020, we divested our ownership interest in the Saudi Organometallic Chemicals Company LLC (“SOCC”) joint venture for cash proceeds of $11.0 million. As a result of this divestiture, the Company recorded a gain of $7.2 million in Other expenses, net during the year ended December 31, 2020.
On October 31, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project in Western Australia andfor a total purchase price of approximately $1.3 billion. As part of this acquisition, we formed MARBL, an unincorporated joint venture with MRL, for the exploration, development, mining, processing and production of lithium and other minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) from the Wodgina Project and for the operation of the Kemerton assets, for a total purchase price of approximately $1.3 billion, subject to certain adjustments capped at $22.5 million. As part of this acquisition, MARBL Lithium Operations Pty. Ltd. (the “Manager”), an incorporated joint venture, was formed to manage the Wodgina Project.
On April 3, 2018, we completed the sale of the polyolefin catalysts and components portion of the PCS business (“Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture”) to W.R. Grace & Co. for net cash proceeds of approximately $413.6 million. The transaction included Albemarle’s Product Development Center located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and operations at our Yeosu, South Korea site. The sale did not include the organometallics or curatives portion of the PCS business.assets.
These transactions reflect our commitment to investing in future growth of our high priority businesses, maintaining leverage flexibility and returning capital to our shareholders.
Employees
As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately 6,000 employees, including employees of our consolidated joint ventures, of whom 2,800, or 47%, are employed in the U.S. and Latin America; 1,500, or 25%, are employed in Europe; 1,200, or 20%, are employed in Asia and 500, or 8%, are employed in the Middle East or other areas. Approximately 22% of these employees are represented by unions or works councils. We believe that we generally have a good relationship with our employees, and with those unions and works councils.
Available Information
Our website address is www.albemarle.com. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), as well as beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this report or incorporated into any other filings we make with the SEC. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding SEC registrants, including Albemarle.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct and the charters of the Audit and Finance, Health, Safety and Environment, Executive Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees of our Board of Directors are also available on our website and are available in print to any shareholder upon request by writing to Investor Relations, 4250 Congress Street, Suite 900, Charlotte, North Carolina 28209, or by calling (980) 299-5700.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Item 1A.Risk Factors.
You should consider carefully the following risks when reading the information, including the financial information, contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our substantial international operations subject us to risks of doing business in foreign countries, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We conduct a substantial portion of our business outside the U.S., with approximately 76%78% of our sales to foreign countries. We operate and/or sell our products to customers in approximately 7570 countries. We currently have many production facilities, research and development and administrative facilities, as well as sales offices located outside the U.S., as detailed in Item 2. Properties. Accordingly, our business is subject to risks related to the differing legal, political, social and regulatory requirements and economic conditions of many jurisdictions. Risks inherent in international operations include the following:
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may affect product demand and may adversely affect the profitability in U.S. dollars of products and services we provide in international markets where payment for our products and services is made in the local currency;
transportation and other shipping costs may increase, or transportation may be inhibited;
increased cost or decreased availability of raw materials;
increased regulations on, or reduced access to, scare resources, such as freshwater;
changes in foreign laws and tax rates or U.S. laws and tax rates with respect to foreign income may unexpectedly increase the rate at which our income is taxed, impose new and additional taxes on remittances, repatriation or other payments by subsidiaries, or cause the loss of previously recorded tax benefits;
9

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
foreign countries in which we do business may adopt other restrictions on foreign trade or investment, including currency exchange controls;
trade sanctions by or against these countries could result in our losing access to customers and suppliers in those countries;
unexpected adverse changes in foreign laws or regulatory requirements may occur;
our agreements with counterparties in foreign countries may be difficult for us to enforce and related receivables may be difficult for us to collect;
compliance with the variety of foreign laws and regulations may be unduly burdensome;
compliance with anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws (such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act) as well as anti-money-laundering laws may be costly;
unexpected adverse changes in export duties, quotas and tariffs and difficulties in obtaining export licenses may occur;
general economic conditions in the countries in which we operate could have an adverse effect on our earnings from operations in those countries;
our foreign operations may experience staffing difficulties and labor disputes;
termination or substantial modification of international trade agreements may adversely affect our access to raw materials and to markets for our products outside the U.S.;
foreign governments may nationalize or expropriate private enterprises;
increased sovereign risk (such as default by or deterioration in the economies and credit worthiness of local governments) may occur; and
political or economic repercussions from terrorist activities, including the possibility of hyperinflationary conditions and political instability, may occur in certain countries in which we do business.
In addition, certain of our operations, and we have ongoing capital projects, in regions of the world such as the Middle East and South America, that are of high risk due to significant civil, political and security instability. Unanticipated events, such as geopolitical changes, could result in a write-down of our investment in the affected joint venture or a delay or cause cancellation of those capital projects, which could negatively impact our future growth and profitability. Our success as a global business will depend, in part, upon our ability to succeed in differing legal, regulatory, economic, social and political conditions by developing, implementing and maintaining policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we and our joint ventures do business.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Furthermore, we are subject to rules and regulations related to anti-bribery and anti-trust prohibitions of the U.S. and other countries, as well as export controls and economic embargoes, violations of which may carry substantial penalties. For example, export control and economic embargo regulations limit the ability of our subsidiaries to market, sell, distribute or otherwise transfer their products or technology to prohibited countries or persons. Failure to comply with these regulations could subject our subsidiaries to fines, enforcement actions and/or have an adverse effect on our reputation and the value of our common stock.
Our inability to secure key raw materials, or to pass through increases in costs and expenses for other raw materials and energy, on a timely basis or at all, including due to climate change, could have an adverse effect on the margins of our products and our results of operations.
The long-term profitability of our operations will, in part, depend on our ability to continue to economically obtain resources, including energy and raw materials. For example, our lithium and bromine businesses rely upon our continued ability to produce, or otherwise obtain, lithium and bromine of sufficient quality and in adequate amounts to meet our customers’ demand. If we fail to secure and retain the rights to continue to access these key raw materials, we may have to restrict or suspend our operations that rely upon these key resources, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, in some cases access to these raw materials by us and our competitors is subject to decisions or actions by governmental authorities, which could adversely impact us. Furthermore, other raw material and energy costs account for a significant percentage of our total costs of products sold, even if they can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Our raw material and energy costs can be volatile and may increase significantly. Increases are primarily driven by tightening of market conditions and major increases in the pricing of key constituent materials for our products such as crude oil, chlorine and metals (including molybdenum and rare earths which are used in the refinery catalysts business). We generally attempt to pass through changes in the prices of raw materials and energy to our customers, but we may be unable to do so (or may be delayed in doing so). In addition, raising prices we charge to our customers in order to offset increases in the prices we pay for raw materials could cause us to suffer a loss of sales volumes. Our inability to efficiently and effectively pass through price increases, or inventory impacts resulting from price volatility, could adversely affect our margins.
10

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Competition within our industry may place downward pressure on the prices and margins of our products and may adversely affect our businesses and results of operations.
We compete against a number of highly competitive global specialty chemical producers. Competition is based on several key criteria, including product performance and quality, product price, product availability and security of supply, and responsiveness of product development in cooperation with customers and customer service. Some of our competitors are larger than we are and may have greater financial resources. These competitors may also be able to maintain significantly greater operating and financial flexibility. As a result, these competitors may be better able to withstand changes in conditions within our industry. Competitors’ pricing decisions could compel us to decrease our prices, which could negatively affect our margins and profitability. Our ability to maintain or increase our profitability is, and will continue to be, dependent upon our ability to offset decreases in the prices and margins of our products by improving production efficiency and volume and other productivity enhancements, shifting to production of higher margin chemical products and improving existing products through innovation and research and development. If we are unable to do so or to otherwise maintain our competitive position, we could lose market share to our competitors.
In addition, Albemarle’s brands, product image and trademarks represent the unique product identity of each of our products and are important symbols of the Company’s reputation. Accordingly, the performance of our business could be adversely affected by any marketing and promotional materials used by our competitors that make adverse claims, whether with or without merit, against our Company or its products, imply or assert immoral or improper conduct by us, or are otherwise disparaging of our Company or its products. Further, our own actions could hurt such brands, product image and trademarks if our products underperform or we otherwise draw negative publicity.
Our research and development efforts may not succeed in addressing changes in our customers’ needs, and our competitors may develop more effective or successful products.
Our industries and the end markets into which we sell our products experience technological change and product improvement. Manufacturers periodically introduce new products or require new technological capacity to develop customized products. Our future growth depends on our ability to gauge the direction of the commercial and technological progress in all key end markets in which we sell our products and upon our ability to fund and successfully develop, manufacture and market products in such changing end markets. As a result, we must commit substantial resources each year to research and development. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to identify, develop, market and, in certain cases, secure regulatory approval for, innovative products in a timely manner or at all, as may be required to replace or enhance existing products, and any such inability could have a material adverse effect on our profit margins and our competitive position.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

In addition, our customers use our specialty chemicals for a broad range of applications. Changes in our customers’ products or processes may enable our customers to reduce consumption of the specialty chemicals that we produce or make our specialty chemicals unnecessary. Customers may also find alternative materials or processes that do not require our products. Should a customer decide to use a different material due to price, performance or other considerations, we may not be able to supply a product that meets the customer’s new requirements. Consequently, it is important that we develop new products to replace the sales of products that mature and decline in use. Our business, results of operations, cash flows and margins could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to manage successfully the maturation of our existing products and the introduction of new products.
Despite our efforts, we may not be successful in developing new products and/or technology, either alone or with third parties, or licensing intellectual property rights from third parties on a commercially competitive basis. Our new products may not be accepted by our customers or may fail to receive regulatory approval. Moreover, new products may have lower margins than the products they replace. Furthermore, ongoing investments in research and development for the future do not yield an immediate beneficial impact on our operating results and therefore could result in higher costs without a proportional increase in revenues.
The development of non-lithium battery technologies could adversely affect us.
The development and adoption of new battery technologies that rely on inputs other than lithium compounds, could significantly impact our prospects and future revenues. Current and next generation high energy density batteries for use in electric vehicles rely on lithium compounds as a critical input. Alternative materials and technologies are being researched with the goal of making batteries lighter, more efficient, faster charging and less expensive, and some of these could be less reliant on lithium compounds. We cannot predict which new technologies may ultimately prove to be commercially viable and on what time horizon. Commercialized battery technologies that use no, or significantly less, lithium could materially and adversely impact our prospects and future revenues.
Adverse conditions in the economy, and volatility and disruption of financial markets can negatively impact our customers, suppliers and other business partners and therefore have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
11

A global, regional or localized economic downturn may reduce customer demand or inhibit our ability to produce our products, negatively impacting our operating results. Our business and operating results have been and will continue to be sensitive to the many challenges that can affect national, regional and global economies, including economic downturns (including credit market tightness, which can impact our liquidity as well as that of our customers, suppliers and other business partners), declining consumer and business confidence, fluctuating commodity prices and volatile exchange rates. Our customers may experience deterioration of their businesses, cash flow shortages and difficulty obtaining financing, leading them to delay or cancel plans to purchase products, and they may not be able to fulfill their obligations in a timely fashion. Further, suppliers and other business partners may experience similar conditions, which could impact their ability to fulfill their obligations to us. Also, it could be difficult to find replacements for business partners without incurring significant delays or cost increases.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Downturns in our customers’ industries, many of which are cyclical, could adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Downturns in the businesses that use our specialty chemicals may adversely affect our sales. Many of our customers are in industries, including the electronics, building and construction, oilfield and automotive industries, which are cyclical in nature, or which are subject to secular market downturns. Historically, cyclical or secular industry downturns have resulted in diminished demand for our products, excess manufacturing capacity and lower average selling prices, and we may experience similar problems in the future. A decline in our customers’ industries may have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
Our results are subject to fluctuation because of irregularities in the demand for our HPC catalysts and certain of our agrichemicals.
Our HPC catalysts are used by petroleum refiners in their processing units to reduce the quantity of sulfur and other impurities in petroleum products. The effectiveness of HPC catalysts diminishes with use, requiring the HPC catalysts to be replaced, on average, once every one to four years. The sales of our HPC catalysts, therefore, are largely dependent on the useful life cycle of the HPC catalysts in the processing units and may vary materially by quarter. In addition, the timing and profitability of HPC catalysts sales can have a significant impact on revenue and profit in any one quarter. Sales of our agrichemicals are also subject to fluctuation as demand varies depending on climate and other environmental conditions, which may prevent or reduce farming for extended periods. In addition, crop pricing and the timing of when farms alternate from one crop to another crop in a particular year can also alter sales of agrichemicals.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Regulation, or the threat of regulation, of some of our products could have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
We manufacture or market a number of products that are or have been the subject of attention by regulatory authorities and environmental interest groups. For example, over the past decade, there has been increasing scrutiny of certain brominated flame retardants by regulatory authorities, legislative bodies and environmental interest groups in various countries. We manufacture a broad range of brominated flame retardant products, which are used in a variety of applications to protect people, property and the environment from injury and damage caused by fire. Concern about the impact of some of our products on human health or the environment may lead to regulation, or reaction in our markets independent of regulation, that could reduce or eliminate markets for such products.
Agencies in the European Union (“E.U.”) continue to evaluate the risks to human health and the environment associated with certain brominated flame retardants such as tetrabromobisphenol A and decabromodiphenylethane, both of which we manufacture. Additional government regulations, including limitations or bans on the use of brominated flame retardants, could result in a decline in our net sales of brominated flame retardants and have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability. In addition, the threat of additional regulation or concern about the impact of brominated flame retardants on human health or the environment could lead to a negative reaction in our markets that could reduce or eliminate our markets for these products, which could have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
Our business and our customers are subject to significant requirements under REACH, which imposes obligations on E.U. manufacturers and importers of chemicals and other products into the E.U. to compile and file comprehensive reports, including testing data, on each chemical substance, and perform chemical safety assessments. Additionally, substances of high concern, as defined under REACH, are subject to an authorization process, which may result in restrictions in the use of products by application or even banning the product. REACH regulations impose significant additional burdens on chemical producers, importers, downstream users of chemical substances and preparations, and the entire supply chain. See “Regulation” in Item 1. Business. Our significant manufacturing presence and sales activities in the E.U. requires significant compliance costs and may result in increases in the costs of raw materials we purchase and the products we sell. Increases in the costs of our products could result in a decrease in their overall demand; additionally, customers may seek products that are not regulated by REACH,with lower regulatory compliance requirements, which could also result in a decrease in the demand of certain products subject to the REACH regulations.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”), as amended in June 2016,TSCA requires chemicals to be assessed against a risk-based safety standard and calling for the elimination of unreasonable risks identified during risk evaluation. This regulation and other pending initiatives at the U.S. state level, as well as initiatives in Canada, Asia and other regions, could potentially require toxicological testing and risk assessments of a wide variety of chemicals, including chemicals used or produced by us. These assessments may result in heightened concerns about the chemicals involved and additional requirements being placed on the production, handling, labeling or use of the subject chemicals. Such concerns and additional requirements could also increase the cost incurred by our customers to use our chemical products and otherwise limit the use of these products, which could lead to a decrease in demand for these products. Such a decrease in demand could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
12

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We could be subject to damages based on claims brought against us by our customers or lose customers as a result of the failure of our products to meet certain quality specifications.
Our products provide important performance attributes to our customers’ products. If a product fails to perform in a manner consistent with quality specifications or has a shorter useful life than guaranteed, a customer of ours could seek the replacement of the product or damages for costs incurred as a result of the product failing to perform as guaranteed. These risks apply to our refinery catalysts in particular because, in certain instances, we sell our refinery catalysts under agreements that contain limited performance and life cycle guarantees. Also, because many of our products are integrated into our customers’ products, we may be requested to participate in, or fund in whole or in part the costs of, a product recall conducted by a customer. For example, some of our businesses supply products to customers in the automotive industry. In the event one of these customers conducts a product recall that it believes is related to one of our products, we may be asked to participate in, or fund in whole or in part, such a recall.
Our customers often require our subsidiaries to represent that our products conform to certain product specifications provided by our customers. Any failure to comply with such specifications could result in claims or legal action against us. 
A successful claim or series of claims against us could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and could result in our loss of one or more customers.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Our business is subject to hazards common to chemical and natural resource extraction businesses, any of which could injure our employees or other persons, damage our facilities or other properties, interrupt our production and adversely affect our reputation and results of operations.
Our business is subject to hazards common to chemical manufacturing, storage, handling and transportation, as well as natural resource extraction, including explosions, fires, severe weather, natural disasters, mechanical failure, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, remediation, chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases and other risks. These hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life to our employees and other persons, severe damage to, or destruction of, property and equipment and environmental contamination. In addition, the occurrence of disruptions, shutdowns or other material operating problems at our facilities due to any of these hazards may diminish our ability to meet our output goals. Accordingly, these hazards and their consequences could adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our operations as a whole, including our results of operations and cash flows, both during and after the period of operational difficulties.
Our business could be adversely affected by environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.
The nature of our business, including historical operations at our current and former facilities, exposes us to risks of liability under environmental laws and regulations due to the production, storage, use, transportation and sale of materials that can cause contamination or personal injury if released into the environment. In the jurisdictions in which we operate, we are subject to numerous U.S. and non-U.S. national, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated properties. We currently use, and in the past have used, hazardous substances at many of our facilities, and we have in the past been, and may in the future be, subject to claims relating to exposure to hazardous materials. We also have generated, and continue to generate, hazardous wastes at a number of our facilities. Some of our facilities also have lengthy histories of manufacturing or other activities that may have resulted in site contamination. Liabilities associated with the investigation and cleanup of hazardous substances, as well as personal injury, property damages or natural resource damages arising from the release of, or exposure to, such hazardous substances, may be imposed in many situations without regard to violations of laws or regulations or other fault, and may also be imposed jointly and severally (so that a responsible party may be held liable for more than its share of the losses involved, or even the entire loss). Such liabilities may also be imposed on many different entities, including, for example, current and prior property owners or operators, as well as entities that arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances. Such liabilities may be material and can be difficult to identify or quantify.
Further, some of the raw materials we handle are subject to government regulation. These regulations affect the manufacturing processes, handling, uses and applications of our products. In addition, our production facilities and a number of our distribution centers require numerous operating permits. Due to the nature of these requirements and changes in our operations, our operations may exceed limits under permits or we may not have the proper permits to conduct our operations. Ongoing compliance with such laws, regulations and permits is an important consideration for us and we incur substantial capital and operating costs in our compliance efforts.
13

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Compliance with environmental laws generally increases the costs of manufacturing, registration/approval requirements, transportation and storage of raw materials and finished products, and storage and disposal of wastes, and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. We may incur substantial costs, including fines, damages, criminal or civil sanctions and remediation costs, or experience interruptions in our operations, for violations arising under these laws or permit requirements. Additional information may arise in the future concerning the nature or extent of our liability with respect to identified sites, and additional sites may be identified for which we are alleged to be liable, that could cause us to materially increase our environmental accrual or the upper range of the costs we believe we could reasonably incur for such matters. Furthermore, environmental laws are subject to change and have become increasingly stringent in recent years. We expect this trend to continue and to require materially increased capital expenditures and operating and compliance costs.
We may be subject to indemnity claims and liable for other payments relating to properties or businesses we have divested. 
In connection with the sale of certain properties and businesses, we have agreed to indemnify the purchasers of such properties for certain types of matters, such as certain breaches of representations and warranties, taxes and certain environmental matters. With respect to environmental matters, the discovery of contamination arising from properties that we have divested may expose us to indemnity obligations under the sale agreements with the buyers of such properties or cleanup obligations and other damages under applicable environmental laws. We may not have insurance coverage for such indemnity obligations or cash flows to make such indemnity or other payments. Further, we cannot predict the nature of and the amount of any indemnity or other obligations we may have to the applicable purchaser. Such payments may be costly and may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

At several of our properties where hazardous substances are known to exist (including some sites where hazardous substances are being investigated or remediated), we believe we are entitled to contractual indemnification from one or more former owners or operators; however, in the event we make a claim, the indemnifier may disagree with us regarding, or not have the financial capacity to fulfill, its indemnity obligation. If our contractual indemnity is not upheld or effective, our accrual and/or our costs for the investigation and cleanup of hazardous substances could increase materially.
We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar foreign anti-corruption laws.
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) and similar foreign anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions around the world generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments or providing anything of value to non-U.S. government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or securing an unfair advantage. We operate in some parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree, and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Although we have established formal policies or procedures for prohibiting or monitoring this conduct, we cannot assure you that our employees or other agents will not engage in such conduct for which we might be held responsible. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees, agents or distributors have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. If we are found to be liable for violations of the FCPA or other applicable anti-corruption laws (either due to our own acts or our inadvertence, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others, including employees of our joint ventures), we could suffer from civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
As previouslyfirst reported in 2018, and 2019, following receipt of information regarding potential improper payments being made by third partythird-party sales representatives of our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, we promptly retained outside counsel and forensic accountants to investigate potential violations of the Company’s Code of Conduct, the FCPA, and other potentially applicable laws. Based on this internal investigation, we have voluntarily self-reported potential issues relating to the use of third partythird-party sales representatives in our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, to the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the SEC, and the Dutch Public Prosecutor (“DPP”), and are cooperating with the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP in their review of these matters. In connection with our internal investigation, we have implemented, and are continuing to implement, appropriate remedial measures. We have commenced discussions with the SEC about a potential resolution.
At this time, we are unable to predict the duration, scope, result, or related costs associated with the investigations by the DOJ, the SEC, or DPP.investigations. We also are unable to predict what if any, action may be taken by the DOJ, the SEC, or the DPP, or what penalties or remedial actions they may ultimately seek. Any determination that our operations or activities are not, or were not, in compliance with existing laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses. An adverse resolution could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a particular period.

14

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We are subject to extensive foreign government regulation that can negatively impact our business.
We are subject to government regulation in non-U.S. jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. The requirements for compliance with these laws and regulations may be unclear or indeterminate and may involve significant costs, including additional capital expenditures or increased operating expenses, or require changes in business practice, in each case that could result in reduced profitability for our business. Our having to comply with these foreign laws or regulations may provide a competitive advantage to competitors who are not subject to comparable restrictions or prevent us from taking advantage of growth opportunities. Determination of noncompliance can result in penalties or sanctions that could also adversely impact our operating results and financial condition.
Our inability to protect our intellectual property rights, or being accused of infringing on intellectual property rights of third parties,, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Protection of our proprietary processes, methods and compounds and other technology is important to our business. We generally rely on patent, trade secret, trademark and copyright laws of the U.S. and certain other countries in which our products are produced or sold, as well as licenses and nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements, to protect our intellectual property rights. The patent, trade secret, trademark and copyright laws of some countries, or their enforcement, may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. Failure to protect our intellectual property rights may result in the loss of valuable proprietary technologies. Additionally, some of our technologies are not covered by any patent or patent application and, even if a patent application has been filed, it may not result in an issued patent. If patents are issued to us, those patents may not provide meaningful protection against competitors or against competitive technologies. We cannot assure you that our intellectual property rights will not be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

We also conduct research and development activities with third parties and license certain intellectual property rights from third parties and we plan to continue to do so in the future. We endeavor to license or otherwise obtain intellectual property rights on terms favorable to us. However, we may not be able to license or otherwise obtain intellectual property rights on such terms or at all. Our inability to license or otherwise obtain such intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on our ability to create a competitive advantage and create innovative solutions for our customers, which will adversely affect our net sales and our relationships with our customers.
We could face patent infringement claims from our competitors or others alleging that our processes or products infringe on their proprietary technologies. If we are found to be infringing on the proprietary technology of others, we may be liable for damages and we may be required to change our processes, redesign our products partially or completely, pay to use the technology of others, stop using certain technologies or stop producing the infringing product entirely. Even if we ultimately prevail in an infringement suit, the existence of the suit could prompt customers to switch to products that are not the subject of infringement suits. We may not prevail in intellectual property litigation and such litigation may result in significant legal costs or otherwise impede our ability to produce and distribute key products.
We also rely upon unpatented proprietary manufacturing expertise, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop and maintain our competitive position. While we generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and third parties to protect our intellectual property, we cannot assure you that our confidentiality agreements will not be breached, that they will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets and proprietary manufacturing expertise or that adequate remedies will be available in the event of an unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets or manufacturing expertise. In addition, our trade secrets and know-how may be improperly obtained by other means, such as a breach of our information technologies security systems or direct theft.
Our inability to acquire or develop additional reserves that are economically viable could have a material adverse effect on our future profitability.
Our lithium reserves will, without more, decline as we continue to extract these raw materials. Accordingly, our future profitability depends upon our ability to acquire additional lithium reserves that are economically viable to replace the reserves we will extract. Exploration and development of lithium resources are highly speculative in nature. Exploration projects involve many risks, require substantial expenditures and may not result in the discovery of sufficient additional resources that can be extracted profitably. Once a site with potential resources is discovered, it may take several years of development until production is possible, during which time the economic viability of production may change. Substantial expenditures are required to establish recoverable proven and probable reserves and to construct extraction and production facilities. As a result, there is no assurance that current or future exploration programs will be successful and there is a risk that depletion of reserves will not be offset by discoveries or acquisitions.
15

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We utilize feasibility studies to estimate the anticipated economic returns of an exploration project. The actual project profitability or economic feasibility may differ from such estimates as a result of factors such as, but not limited to, changes in volumes, grades and characteristics of resources to be mined and processed; changes in labor costs or availability of adequate and skilled labor force; the quality of the data on which engineering assumptions were made; adverse geotechnical conditions; availability, supply and cost of water and power; fluctuations in inflation and currency exchange rates; delays in obtaining environmental or other government permits or approvals or changes in the laws and regulations related to our operations or project development; changes in royalty agreements, laws and/or regulations around royalties and other taxes; and weather or severe climate impacts.
For our existing operations, we utilize geological and metallurgical assumptions, financial projections and price estimates. These estimates are periodically updated to reflect changes in our operations, including modifications to our proven and probable reserves and mineralized material, revisions to environmental obligations, changes in legislation and/or social, political or economic environment, and other significant events associated with natural resource extraction operations. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities and qualities of lithium and costs to extract recoverable reserves, including many factors beyond our control, that could cause results to differ materially from expected financial and operating results or result in future impairment charges. In addition, it cannot be assumed that any part or all of the inferred mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves, as defined by the SEC. See Item 2. Properties, for a discussion and quantification of our current mineral resources and reserves.
There is risk to the growth of lithium markets.
Our lithium business is significantly dependent on the development and adoption of new applications for lithium powerbatteries and the growth in demand for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles. To the extent that such development, adoption and growth do not occur in the volume and/or manner that we contemplate, including for reasons described under the heading “The development of non-lithium battery technologies could adversely affect us,” above, the long-term growth in the markets for
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

lithium products may be adversely affected, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Demand and market prices for lithium will greatly affect the value of our investment in our lithium resources and our ability to develop it successfully.
Our ability to successfully develop our lithium resources, including recently acquiredour 60% interest in MRL’sMARBL’s Wodgina Project,mine, and generate a return on investment will be affected by changes in the demand for and market price of lithium-based end products, such as lithium hydroxide. The market price of these products can fluctuate and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control, primarily world supply and demand. Such external economic factors are influenced by changes in international investment patterns, various political developments and macro-economic circumstances. In addition, the price of lithium products is impacted by their purity and performance. We may not be able to effectively mitigate against such fluctuations.
Following the Wodgina acquisition, we announced that, based on current market conditions, the Wodgina mine would idleidled production of spodumene until market demand supportssupported bringing the mine back into production. There can beIn October 2021, MARBL announced its intention to resume spodumene concentrate production at the Wodgina mine, with the production restart expected during the second quarter of 2022, but there are no assuranceassurances that the market demand for lithium will improve or that the Wodgina mine will be put back into production in the futurethat time frame or at all. Delays in putting the mine into production, as well as continued fluctuations in demand for and pricing of lithium and related products may affect the value of our investment in the Wodgina Project and our value as a whole.
Our business and operations could suffer in the event of cybersecurity breaches, information technology system failures, or network disruptions.
Attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems become more sophisticated over time. These attempts, which might be related to industrial or other espionage, include covertly introducing malware to our computers and networks and impersonating authorized users, among others. We seek to detect and investigate all security incidents and to prevent their recurrence, but in some cases we might be unaware of an incident or its magnitude and effects. The theft, unauthorized use or publication of our intellectual property and/or confidential business information could harm our competitive position, reduce the value of our investment in research and development and other strategic initiatives or otherwise adversely affect our business. To the extent that any cybersecurity breach results in inappropriate disclosure of our customers’ or licensees’ confidential information, we may incur liability as a result. The devotion of additional resources to the security of our information technology systems in the future could significantly increase the cost of doing business or otherwise adversely impact our financial results.
In addition, risks associated with information technology systems failures or network disruptions, including risks associated with upgrading our systems or in successfully integrating information technology and other systems in connection with the integration of businesses we acquire, could disrupt our operations by impeding our processing of transactions, financial reporting and our ability to protect our customer or company information, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
The occurrence or threat of extraordinary events, including domestic and international terrorist attacks, may disrupt our operations and decrease demand for our products.
Chemical-related assets may be at greater risk of future terrorist attacks than other possible targets in the U.S. and around the world. As a result, we are subject to existing federal rules and regulations (and may be subject to additional legislation or regulations in the future) that impose site security requirements on chemical manufacturing facilities, which increase our overhead expenses.
We are also subject to federal regulations that have heightened security requirements for the transportation of hazardous chemicals in the U.S. We believe we have met these requirements but additional federal and local regulations that limit the distribution of hazardous materials are being considered. We ship and receive materials that are classified as hazardous. Bans on movement of hazardous materials through cities, like Washington, D.C., could affect the efficiency of our logistical operations. Broader restrictions on hazardous material movements could lead to additional investment to produce hazardous raw materials and change where and what products we manufacture.
The Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards program (“CFATS Program”), which is administered by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), identifies and regulates chemical facilities to ensure that they have security measures in place to reduce the risks associated with potential terrorist attacks on chemical plants located in the U.S. In December 2014, the Protecting and Securing Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 (“CFATS Act”) was enacted. The CFATS Act reauthorized the CFATS Program for four years. On January 18, 2019, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Extension Act was enacted to extend the CFATS Program for another 15 months. DHS has released an interim final rule under the CFATS Program that imposes comprehensive federal security regulations for high-risk chemical facilities in possession of specified quantities of chemicals of interest. This rule establishes risk-based performance standards for the security of the U.S.'s chemical facilities. It requires covered chemical facilities to prepare Security Vulnerability Assessments, which identify facility security vulnerabilities, and to develop and implement Site Security Plans, which include measures that satisfy the identified risk-based performance standards. We cannot determine with certainty the costs associated with any security measures that DHS may require.
The occurrence of extraordinary events, including future terrorist attacks and the outbreak or escalation of hostilities, cannot be predicted, and their occurrence can be expected to continue to negatively affect the economy in general, and the markets for our products in particular. The resulting damage from a direct attack on our assets, or assets used by us, could include loss of life and property damage. In addition, available insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all of the damage incurred or, if available, may be prohibitively expensive.
Natural disasters or other unanticipated catastrophes could impact our results of operations.
The occurrence of natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods or earthquakes; pandemics, such as the recent outbreak of the novel coronavirus COVID-19; or other unanticipated catastrophes at any of the locations in which we or our key partners, suppliers and customers do business, could cause interruptions in our operations. Historically, major hurricanes have caused significant disruption to the operations on the U.S. Gulf Coast for many of our customers and our suppliers of certain raw materials, which had an adverse impact on volume and cost for some of our products. Our operations in Chile could be subject to significant rain events and earthquakes, and our operations in Asia could be subject to weather events such as typhoons. A global or regional pandemic or similar outbreak in a region of our, our customers, or our suppliers could disrupt business. If similar or other weather events, natural disasters, or other catastrophe events occur in the future, they could negatively affect the results of operations at our sites in the affected regions as well as have adverse impacts on the global economy.
Our insurance may not fully cover all potential exposures.
We maintain property, business interruption, casualty, and other insurance, but such insurance may not cover all risks associated with the hazards of our business and is subject to limitations, including deductibles and coverage limits. We may incur losses beyond the limits, or outside the coverage, of our insurance policies, including liabilities for environmental remediation. In addition, from time to time, various types of insurance for companies in the specialty chemical industry have not been available on commercially acceptable terms or, in some cases, have not been available at all. We are potentially at additional risk if one or more of our insurance carriers fail. Additionally, severe disruptions in the domestic and global financial markets could adversely impact the ratings and survival of some insurers. Future downgrades in the ratings of enough insurers could adversely impact both the availability of appropriate insurance coverage and its cost. In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, if at all, and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain.
We may be exposed to certain regulatory and financial risks related to climate change.
Growing concerns about climate change may result in the imposition of additional regulations or restrictions to which we may become subject. Climate changes include changes in rainfall and in storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, significantly changing sea levels and increasing atmospheric and water temperatures, among others. For example, there have been concerns regarding the declining water level of the Dead Sea, from which our joint venture, JBC, produces bromine. A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to climate change, including regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Potentially, additional U.S. federal regulation will be forthcoming with respect to greenhouse gas emissions (including carbon dioxide) and/or “cap and trade” legislation that could impact our operations. In addition, we have operations in the E.U., Brazil, China, Japan, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, which have implemented, or may implement, measures to achieve objectives under the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCC”), which set targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The outcome of new legislation or regulation in the U.S. and other jurisdictions in which we operate may result in new or additional requirements, additional charges to fund energy efficiency activities, and fees or restrictions on certain activities. While certain climate change initiatives may result in new business opportunities for us in the area of alternative fuel technologies and emissions control, compliance with these initiatives may also result in additional costs to us, including, among other things, increased production costs, additional taxes, reduced emission allowances or additional restrictions on production or operations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Even without such regulation, increased public awareness and adverse publicity about potential impacts on climate change emanating from us or our industry could harm us. We may not be
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

able to recover the cost of compliance with new or more stringent laws and regulations, which could adversely affect our business and negatively impact our growth. Furthermore, the potential impact of climate change and related regulation on our customers is highly uncertain and there can be no assurance that it will not have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Economic conditions and regulatory changes relating to the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union could adversely impact our business.
Following a referendum in 2016, voters in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) approved that country’s exit from the E.U., a process often referred to as “Brexit.” The U.K. formally left the E.U. on January 31, 2020, and is now in a transition period through December 31, 2020. The future effects of Brexit will depend on any agreements the U.K. makes to retain access to the E.U. or other markets either during a transitional period or more permanently. Given the lack of comparable precedent and the uncertainty around the terms upon which the U.K. will leave the E.U., it is unclear what financial, trade and legal implications Brexit would have and how such withdrawal would affect our Company. We derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales outside the U.S., including 15% from E.U. countries. The consequences of Brexit, together with what may be protracted negotiations around the terms of Brexit (including the possibility of a so-called “Hard Brexit,” where no formal agreement is made between the E.U. and U.K. prior to the U.K.’s exit from the E.U.), could introduce significant uncertainties into global financial markets, including volatility in foreign currencies, and adversely impact the markets in which we and our customers operate. Adverse consequences such as deterioration in economic conditions, volatility in currency exchange rates or adverse changes in regulation could have a negative impact on our future operations, operating results and financial condition. All of these potential consequences could be further magnified if additional countries were to exit the E.U.
If we are unable to retain key personnel or attract new skilled personnel, it could have an adverse effect on our business.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain key personnel including our management team. In light of the specialized and technical nature of our business, our performance is dependent on the continued service of, and on our ability to attract and retain, qualified management, scientific, technical, marketing and support personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we may be unable to continue to attract or retain such personnel. In addition, because of our reliance on our senior management team, the unanticipated departure of any key member of our management team could have an adverse effect on our business. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to identify and develop or recruit talent to succeed our senior management and other key positions throughout the organization. If we fail to identify and develop or recruit successors, we are at risk of being harmed by the departures of these key employees. Effective succession planning is also important to our long-term success. Failure to ensure effective transfer of knowledge and smooth transitions involving key employees could hinder our strategic planning and execution.
On February 5, 2020, the Company announced that Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Luke Kissam had advised the Board of Directors that he will retire from his roles as an officer and director of Albemarle effective June 2020, for health reasons. The Board of Directors will be conducting a comprehensive search process, which will include internal and external candidates.
16

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Some of our employees are unionized, represented by works councils or are employed subject to local laws that are less favorable to employers than the laws of the U.S.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had approximately 6,000 employees, including employees of our consolidated joint ventures. Approximately 22%46% of these employees are represented by unions or works councils. In addition, a large number of our employees are employed in countries in which employment laws provide greater bargaining or other rights to employees than the laws of the U.S. Such employment rights require us to work collaboratively with the legal representatives of those employees to effect any changes to labor arrangements. For example, most of our employees in Europe are represented by works councils that must approve any changes in conditions of employment, including salaries and benefits and staff changes, and may impede efforts to restructure our workforce. Although we believe that we have a good working relationship with our employees, a strike, work stoppage, slowdown or significant dispute with our employees could result in a significant disruption of our operations or higher labor costs.
Our joint ventures may not operate according to their business plans if our partners fail to fulfill their obligations, which may adversely affect our results of operations and may force us to dedicate additional resources to these joint ventures.
We currently participate in a number of joint ventures and may enter into additional joint ventures in the future. The nature of a joint venture requires us to share control with unaffiliated third parties. If our joint venture partners do not fulfill their obligations, the affected joint venture may not be able to operate according to its business plan. In that case, our results of operations may be adversely affected and we may be required to materially change the level of our commitment to the joint
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

venture. Also, differences in views among joint venture participants may result in delayed decisions or failures to agree on major issues. If these differences cause the joint ventures to deviate from their business plans, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Financial Condition
Our required capital expenditures can be complex, may experience delays or other difficulties, and the costs may exceed our estimates.
Our capital expenditures generally consist of expenditures to maintain and improve existing equipment, facilities and properties, and substantial investments in new or expanded equipment, facilities and properties. Execution of these capital expenditures can be complex, and commencement of production requires start-up, commission and certification of product quality by our customers, which may impact the expected output and timing of sales of product from such facilities. Construction of large chemical operations is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, among others, the ability to complete a project on a timely basis and in accordance with the estimated budget for such project and our ability to estimate future demand for our products. In addition, our returns on these capital expenditures may not meet our expectations.
Future capital expenditures may be significantly higher, depending on the investment requirements of each of our business lines, and may also vary substantially if we are required to undertake actions to compete with new technologies in our industry. We may not have the capital necessary to undertake these capital investments. If we are unable to do so, we may not be able to effectively compete in some of our markets.
We will need a significant amount of cash to service our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or use existing cash balances to make scheduled payments on our debt depends on a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt obligations. If we are unable to service our debt obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets or raise additional equity. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, sell assets or raise additional equity on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could cause us to default on our obligations and impair our liquidity. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow or use existing cash balances to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Restrictive covenants in our debt instruments may adversely affect our business.
Our senior credit facilities and the indentures governing our senior notes contain select restrictive covenants. These covenants provide constraints on our financial flexibility. The failure to comply with these or other covenants governing other indebtedness, including indebtedness incurred in the future, could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including cross-defaults to
17

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
other debt facilities. See “Financial Condition and Liquidity—Long-Term Debt” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Changes in credit ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations could adversely affect our cost of financing, the market price of our securities and our debt service obligations.
Credit rating agencies rate our debt securities on factors that include our operating results, actions that we take, their view of the general outlook for our industry and their view of the general outlook for the economy. Actions taken by the rating agencies can include maintaining, upgrading or downgrading the current rating or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrades. Downgrading the credit rating of our debt securities or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrades would likely increase our cost of future financing, limit our access to the capital markets and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
Borrowings under a portion of our debt facilities bear interest at floating rates, and are subject to adjustment based on the ratings of our senior unsecured long-term debt. The downgrading of any of our ratings or an increase in any of the benchmark interest rates would result in an increase of the interest expense on our variable rate borrowings.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our operating results and net income.
We conduct our business and incur costs in the local currency of most of the countries in which we operate. Changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. Dollar will affect the recorded levels of our assets, liabilities, net sales, cost of goods sold and operating margins and could result in exchange losses. The primary currencies to which we have exposure are the E.U. Euro, Japanese Yen, Chinese Renminbi, Australian Dollar and Chilean Peso. Exchange rates between these currencies and the U.S. Dollar in recent years have fluctuated significantly and may do so in the future. With respect to our potential exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and devaluations, for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, approximately 32%27% of our net sales were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Significant changes in these foreign currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar could also have an adverse effect on our ability to meet interest and principal payments on any foreign currency-denominated debt outstanding. In addition to currency translation risks, we incur currency transaction risks whenever one of our operating subsidiaries or joint ventures enters into either a purchase or a sales transaction using a different currency from its functional currency. Our operating results and net income may be affected by any volatility in currency exchange rates and our ability to manage effectively our currency transaction and translation risks.
Changes in, or the interpretation of, tax legislation or rates throughout the world could materially impact our results.
Our effective tax rate and related tax balance sheet attributes could be impacted by changes in tax legislation throughout the world. Currently, the majority of our net sales are generated from customers located outside the U.S., and a substantial portion of our assets and employees are located outside of the U.S.
We have not accrued income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings for most non-U.S. subsidiaries, because those earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested in the operations of those subsidiaries. Certain tax proposals with respect to such earnings could substantially increase our tax expense, which would substantially reduce our income and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows from operating activities.
Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, expirations of tax holidays or rulings, changes in the assessment regarding the realization of the valuation of deferred tax assets, or changes in tax laws and regulations or their interpretation. Recent developments, including the European Commission’s investigations on illegal state aid, as well as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) project on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting may result in changes to long-standing tax principles, which could adversely affect our effective tax rates or result in higher cash tax liabilities.
We are subject to the regular examination of our income tax returns by various tax authorities. Examinations in material jurisdictions or changes in laws, rules, regulations or interpretations by local taxing authorities could result in impacts to tax years open under statute or to foreign operating structures currently in place. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations or changes in laws, rules, regulations or interpretations to determine the adequacy of our provision for taxes. It is possible the outcomes from these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

18

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We may be subject to increased tax exposure resulting from Rockwood pre-acquisition periods. 
Under the terms of certain purchase agreements, third party sellers have agreed to substantially indemnify us for tax liabilities pertaining to Rockwood’s periods prior to itsour 2015 acquisition by us.of Rockwood Holdings Inc. (“Rockwood”). These indemnity obligations will continue generally until the applicable statutes of limitations expire. To the extent that such companies fail to indemnify or satisfy their obligations, or if any amount is not covered by the terms of the indemnity, our earnings could be negatively impacted in future periods through increased tax expense.
Future events may impact our deferred tax asset position and U.S. deferred federal income taxes on undistributed earnings of international affiliates that are considered to be indefinitely reinvested.
We evaluate our ability to utilize deferred tax assets and our need for valuation allowances based on available evidence. This process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances between future projected operating performance and actual results. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if we determine, based on available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be utilized. In making this determination, we evaluate all positive and negative evidence as of the end of each reporting period. Future adjustments (either increases or decreases), to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance are determined based upon changes in the expected realization of the net deferred tax assets. The utilization of our deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carry-back or carry-forward periods under the applicable tax law. Due to
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

significant estimates used to establish the valuation allowance and the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is reasonably possible that we will be required to record adjustments to the valuation allowance in future reporting periods. Changes to the valuation allowance or the amount of deferred tax liabilities could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, should we change our assertion regarding the permanent reinvestment of the undistributed earnings in foreign operations, a deferred tax liability may need to be established.
Our business and financial results may be adversely affected by various legal and regulatory proceedings.
We are involved from time to time in legal and regulatory proceedings, which may be material in the future. The outcome of proceedings, lawsuits and claims may differ from our expectations, leading us to change estimates of liabilities and related insurance receivables.
Legal and regulatory proceedings, whether with or without merit, and associated internal investigations, may be time-consuming and expensive to prosecute, defend or conduct, may divert management’s attention and other resources, inhibit our ability to sell our products, result in adverse judgments for damages, injunctive relief, penalties and fines, and otherwise negatively affect our business.
Because a significant portion of our operations is conducted through our subsidiaries and joint ventures, our ability to service our debt may be dependent on our receipt of distributions or other payments from our subsidiaries and joint ventures.
A significant portion of our operations is conducted through our subsidiaries and joint ventures. As a result, our ability to service our debt may be partially dependent on the earnings of our subsidiaries and joint ventures and the payment of those earnings to us in the form of dividends, loans or advances and through repayment of loans or advances from us. Payments to us by our subsidiaries and joint ventures are contingent upon our subsidiaries’ or joint ventures’ earnings and other business considerations and may be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. In addition, there may be significant tax and other legal restrictions on the ability of our non-U.S. subsidiaries or joint ventures to remit money to us.
Although our pension plans currently meet minimum funding requirements, events could occur that would require us to make significant contributions to the plans and reduce the cash available for our business.
We have several defined benefit pension plans around the world, including in the U.S., U.K., Germany, Belgium and Japan. We are required to make cash contributions to our pension plans to the extent necessary to comply with minimum funding requirements imposed by the various countries’ benefit and tax laws. The amount of any such required contributions will be determined annually based on an actuarial valuation of the plans as performed by the plans’ actuaries.
In previous years, we have made voluntary contributions to our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plans. We anticipate approximately $10.8$10 million of required cash contributions during 20202022 for our defined benefit pension plans. Additional voluntary pension contributions in and after 20202022 may vary depending on factors such as asset returns, interest rates, and legislative changes. The amounts we may elect or be required to contribute to our pension plans in the future may increase significantly. These contributions could be substantial and would reduce the cash available for our business.
19

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Further, an economic downturn or recession or market disruption in the capital and credit markets may adversely impact the value of our pension plan assets, our results of operations, our statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and our liquidity. Our funding obligations could change significantly based on the investment performance of the pension plan assets and changes in actuarial assumptions for local statutory funding valuations. Any deterioration of the capital markets or returns available in such markets may negatively impact our pension plan assets and increase our funding obligations for one or more of these plans and negatively impact our liquidity. We cannot predict the impact of this or any further market disruption on our pension funding obligations.
We may not be able to consummate future acquisitions or integrate acquisitions into our business, which could result in unanticipated expenses and losses.
We believe that our customers are increasingly looking for strong, long-term relationships with a few key suppliers that help them improve product performance, reduce costs, and support new product development. To satisfy these growing customer requirements, our competitors have been consolidating within product lines through mergers and acquisitions.
As part of our business growth strategy, we have acquired businesses and entered into joint ventures in the past and intend to pursue acquisitions and joint venture opportunities in the future. Our ability to implement this component of our growth strategy will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate acquisition or joint venture candidates and our financial resources, including available cash and borrowing capacity. The expense incurred in consummating acquisitions or entering into joint
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

ventures, the time it takes to integrate an acquisition or our failure to integrate businesses successfully, could result in unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to realize any of the anticipated benefits from acquisitions or joint ventures.
The process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations. Some of the risks associated with the integration of acquisitions include:
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management;
unforeseen claims and liabilities, including unexpected environmental exposures;
unforeseen adjustments, charges and write-offs;
problems enforcing the indemnification obligations of sellers of businesses or joint venture partners for claims and liabilities;
unexpected losses of customers of, or suppliers to, the acquired business;
difficulty in conforming the acquired businesses’ standards, processes, procedures and controls with our operations;
in the case of foreign acquisitions, the need to integrate operations across different cultures and languages and to address the particular economic, currency, political and regulatory risks associated with specific countries;
variability in financial information arising from the implementation of purchase price accounting;
inability to coordinate new product and process development;
loss of senior managers and other critical personnel and problems with new labor unions and cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization; and
challenges arising from the increased scope, geographic diversity and complexity of our operations.
We may continue to expand our business through acquisitions and we may incur additional indebtedness, including indebtedness related to acquisitions.
We have historically expanded our business primarily through acquisitions. A part of our business strategy is to continue to grow through acquisitions that complement our existing technologies and accelerate our growth. Our credit facilities have limited financial maintenance covenants. In addition, the indenture and other agreements governing our senior notes do not limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness in connection with acquisitions or otherwise. As a result, we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in connection with acquisitions.
Any such additional indebtedness and the related debt service obligations could have important consequences and risks for us, including:
reducing flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our businesses, the competitive environment and the industries in which we operate, and to technological and other changes;
lowering credit ratings;
20

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
reducing access to capital and increasing borrowing costs generally or for any additional indebtedness to finance future operating and capital expenses and for general corporate purposes;
reducing funds available for operations, capital expenditures, share repurchases, dividends and other activities; and
creating competitive disadvantages relative to other companies with lower debt levels.
If our goodwill, intangible assets or long-lived assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.
Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), we review our intangible assets and long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment on October 31 of each year, or more frequently if required. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill, intangible assets or long-lived assets may not be recoverable, include, but are not limited to, a decline in our stock price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow estimates, and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be required to record a significant charge in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill, intangible assets or long-lived assets is determined, negatively impacting our results of operations and financial condition.
General Risk Factors

Adverse conditions in the economy, and volatility and disruption of financial markets can negatively impact our customers, suppliers and other business partners and therefore have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

A global, regional or localized economic downturn may reduce customer demand or inhibit our ability to produce our products, negatively impacting our operating results. Our business and operating results have been and will continue to be sensitive to the many challenges that can affect national, regional and global economies, including economic downturns (including credit market tightness, which can impact our liquidity as well as that of our customers, suppliers and other business partners), declining consumer and business confidence, fluctuating commodity prices and volatile exchange rates. Our customers may experience deterioration of their businesses, cash flow shortages and difficulty obtaining financing, leading them to delay or cancel plans to purchase products, and they may not be able to fulfill their obligations in a timely fashion. Further, suppliers and other business partners may experience similar conditions, which could impact their ability to fulfill their obligations to us. Also, it could be difficult to find replacements for business partners without incurring significant delays or cost increases.
Our business and operations could suffer in the event of cybersecurity breaches, information technology system failures, or network disruptions.
Attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems become more sophisticated over time. These attempts, which might be related to industrial or other espionage, include covertly introducing malware to our computers and networks and impersonating authorized users, among others. We seek to detect and investigate all security incidents and to prevent their recurrence, but in some cases we might be unaware of an incident or its magnitude and effects. The theft, unauthorized use or publication of our intellectual property and/or confidential business information could harm our competitive position, reduce the value of our investment in research and development and other strategic initiatives or otherwise adversely affect our business. To the extent that any cybersecurity breach results in inappropriate disclosure of our customers’ or licensees’ confidential information, we may incur liability as a result. The devotion of additional resources to the security of our information technology systems in the future could significantly increase the cost of doing business or otherwise adversely impact our financial results.
In addition, risks associated with information technology systems failures or network disruptions, including risks associated with upgrading our systems or in successfully integrating information technology and other systems in connection with the integration of businesses we acquire, could disrupt our operations by impeding our processing of transactions, financial reporting and our ability to protect our customer or company information, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
The occurrence or threat of extraordinary events, including domestic and international terrorist attacks, may disrupt our operations and decrease demand for our products.
Chemical-related assets may be at greater risk of future terrorist attacks than other possible targets in the U.S. and around the world. As a result, we are subject to existing federal rules and regulations (and may be subject to additional legislation or regulations in the future) that impose site security requirements on chemical manufacturing facilities, which increase our overhead expenses.
21

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We are also subject to federal regulations that have heightened security requirements for the transportation of hazardous chemicals in the U.S. We believe we have met these requirements but additional federal and local regulations that limit the distribution of hazardous materials are being considered. We ship and receive materials that are classified as hazardous. Bans on movement of hazardous materials through cities, like Washington, D.C., could affect the efficiency of our logistical operations. Broader restrictions on hazardous material movements could lead to additional investment to produce hazardous raw materials and change where and what products we manufacture.
The Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards program (“CFATS Program”), which is administered by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), identifies and regulates chemical facilities to ensure that they have security measures in place to reduce the risks associated with potential terrorist attacks on chemical plants located in the U.S. In December 2014, the Protecting and Securing Chemical Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 (“CFATS Act”) was enacted. DHS has enacted new rules under the CFATS Program that imposes comprehensive federal security regulations for high-risk chemical facilities in possession of specified quantities of chemicals of interest. This rule establishes risk-based performance standards for the security of the U.S.'s chemical facilities. It requires covered chemical facilities to prepare Security Vulnerability Assessments, which identify facility security vulnerabilities, and to develop and implement Site Security Plans, which include measures that satisfy the identified risk-based performance standards. We have implemented all necessary changes to comply with the rules under the CFATS Program to date, however, we cannot determine with certainty any future costs associated with any additional security measures that DHS may require.
The occurrence of extraordinary events, including future terrorist attacks and the outbreak or escalation of hostilities, cannot be predicted, and their occurrence can be expected to continue to negatively affect the economy in general, and the markets for our products in particular. The resulting damage from a direct attack on our assets, or assets used by us, could include loss of life and property damage. In addition, available insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all of the damage incurred or, if available, may be prohibitively expensive.
The COVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant uncertainty and economic disruption. While we have not experienced a material impact to date, the ultimate extent to which it impacts our business, results of operations, financial position, and cash flows is difficult to predict and dependent upon many factors over which we have no control. These factors include, but are not limited to, the duration and severity of the pandemic, including from the discovery of new strain variants; government restrictions on businesses and individuals; the health and safety of our employees and communities in which we do business; the impact of the pandemic on our customers' businesses and the resulting demand for our products; the impact on our suppliers and supply chain network; the impact on U.S. and global economies and the timing and rate of economic recovery; and potential adverse effects on the financial markets.
The Company has taken, and plans to continue to take, certain measures to maintain financial flexibility, including reducing debt balances with an underwritten public offering of its common stock and implementing a cost savings initiative, while still protecting our employees and customers. However, if conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic worsen, the Company may not be able to maintain compliance with its financial covenants and could be required to seek additional amendments to the Credit Agreements. If the Company were not able to obtain any such necessary additional amendments, that would lead to an event of default and its lenders could require the Company to repay its outstanding debt. In that situation, the Company may not be able to raise sufficient debt or equity capital, or divest assets, to refinance or repay the lenders.
Natural disasters or other unanticipated catastrophes could impact our results of operations.
The occurrence of natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods or earthquakes; pandemics, such as COVID-19; or other unanticipated catastrophes at any of the locations in which we or our key partners, suppliers and customers do business, could cause interruptions in our operations. Historically, major hurricanes have caused significant disruption to the operations on the U.S. Gulf Coast for many of our customers and our suppliers of certain raw materials, which had an adverse impact on volume and cost for some of our products. Our operations in Chile could be subject to significant rain events and earthquakes, and our operations in Asia could be subject to weather events such as typhoons. A global or regional pandemic or similar outbreak in a region of our, our customers, or our suppliers could disrupt business. If similar or other weather events, natural disasters, or other catastrophe events occur in the future, they could negatively affect the results of operations at our sites in the affected regions as well as have adverse impacts on the global economy.

22

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Our insurance may not fully cover all potential exposures.
We maintain property, business interruption, casualty, and other insurance, but such insurance may not cover all risks associated with the hazards of our business and is subject to limitations, including deductibles and coverage limits. We may incur losses beyond the limits, or outside the coverage, of our insurance policies, including liabilities for environmental remediation. In addition, from time to time, various types of insurance for companies in the specialty chemical industry have not been available on commercially acceptable terms or, in some cases, have not been available at all. We are potentially at additional risk if one or more of our insurance carriers fail. Additionally, severe disruptions in the domestic and global financial markets could adversely impact the ratings and survival of some insurers. Future downgrades in the ratings of enough insurers could adversely impact both the availability of appropriate insurance coverage and its cost. In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, if at all, and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain.
We may be exposed to certain regulatory and financial risks related to climate change.
Growing concerns about climate change may result in the imposition of additional regulations or restrictions to which we may become subject. Climate changes include changes in rainfall and in storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, significantly changing sea levels and increasing atmospheric and water temperatures, among others. For example, there have been concerns regarding the declining water level of the Dead Sea, from which our joint venture, JBC, produces bromine. A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to climate change, including regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Potentially, additional U.S. federal regulation will be forthcoming with respect to greenhouse gas emissions (including carbon dioxide) and/or “cap and trade” legislation that could impact our operations. In addition, we have operations in the E.U., Brazil, China, Japan, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, which have implemented, or may implement, measures to achieve objectives under the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCC”), which set targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The outcome of new legislation or regulation in the U.S. and other jurisdictions in which we operate may result in new or additional requirements, additional charges to fund energy efficiency activities, and fees or restrictions on certain activities. While certain climate change initiatives may result in new business opportunities for us in the area of alternative fuel technologies and emissions control, compliance with these initiatives may also result in additional costs to us, including, among other things, increased production costs, additional taxes, reduced emission allowances or additional restrictions on production or operations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Even without such regulation, increased public awareness and adverse publicity about potential impacts on climate change emanating from us or our industry could harm us. We may not be able to recover the cost of compliance with new or more stringent laws and regulations, which could adversely affect our business and negatively impact our growth. Furthermore, the potential impact of climate change and related regulation on our customers is highly uncertain and there can be no assurance that it will not have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.
NONE
Item 2.Properties.
We operate globally, with our principal executive offices located in Charlotte, NC, our corporate office located in Baton Rouge, LANorth Carolina and regional shared services offices located in Budapest, Hungary and Dalian, China. AllEach of these properties are leased. We and our affiliates also operate regional sales and administrative offices in various locations throughout the world, which are generally leased.
We believe that our production facilities, research and development facilities, and sales and administrative offices are generally well maintained, effectively used and are adequate to operate our business. During 2019,2021, the Company’s manufacturing plants operated at approximately 80%86% capacity, in the aggregate.
Set forth below is information regarding our significant production facilities operated by us and our affiliates:
affiliates. Additional details regarding our significant mineral properties can be found below the table.
LocationBusiness SegmentPrincipal UseOwned/Leased
Amsterdam, the NetherlandsLithiumCatalysts
Chengdu, ChinaProduction of refinery catalysts, researchlithium carbonate and product development activitiestechnical and battery-grade lithium hydroxideOwned
23

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Bromine SpecialtiesResearch and product development activities, and production of flame retardantsLeased
LocationPrincipal UseOwned/Leased
Bitterfeld, GermanyCatalystsRefinery catalyst regeneration, rejuvenation, and sulfidingOwned by Eurecat S.A., a joint venture owned 50% by each of Axens Group and us
Greenbushes, Australia(a)
LithiumProduction of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium concentrate
Owned by Windfield Holdings Pty Ltd, a joint venture in which we own 49%, and Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries Inc. which owns the remaining interest(e)
Kemerton, Australia(a)(b)
Production of lithium carbonate and technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide
Owned(e)
Jubail, Saudi ArabiaCatalystsManufacturing and marketing of organometallicsOwned by Saudi Organometallic Chemicals Company LLC, a joint venture owned 50% by each of Saudi Specialty Chemicals Company (a SABIC affiliate) and us
Kings Mountain, North CarolinaNCLithiumProduction of technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxide, lithium salts and battery-grade lithium metal productsOwned
La Negra, ChileLithiumProduction of technical and battery-grade lithium carbonate and lithium chlorideOwned
Langelsheim, GermanyLithiumProduction of butyllithium, lithium chloride, specialty products, lithium hydrides, cesium and special metalsOwned
New Johnsonville, TNProduction of butyllithium and specialty productsOwned
Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumLithium; Bromine Specialties; Catalysts; All OtherRegional offices and research and customer technical service activitiesOwned
Salar de Atacama, Chile(a)
Production of lithium brine and potash
Owned(f)
La Voulte, France
Silver Peak, NV(a)
CatalystsRefinery catalysts regenerationProduction of lithium brine, technical-grade lithium carbonate and treatment, researchlithium hydroxideOwned
Taichung, TaiwanProduction of butyllithiumOwned
Wodgina, Australia(a)(c)
Production of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium concentrate
Owned and leased(e)
Xinyu, ChinaProduction of lithium carbonate and technical and battery-grade lithium hydroxideOwned
Bromine
Baton Rouge, LAResearch and product development activities, and production of flame retardantsOwned by Eurecat S.A., a joint venture owned 50% by each of Axens Group and usLeased
Magnolia, AR(a)
Magnolia, ArkansasBromine SpecialtiesProduction of flame retardants, bromine, inorganic bromides, agricultural intermediates and tertiary aminesOwned
Safi, Jordan(a)
Production of bromine and derivatives and flame retardants
Owned and leased(e)
Twinsburg, OHProduction of bromine-activated carbonLeased
Catalysts
Amsterdam, the NetherlandsProduction of refinery catalysts, research and product development activitiesOwned
Bitterfeld, GermanyRefinery catalyst regeneration, rejuvenation, and sulfiding
Owned(e)
La Voulte, FranceRefinery catalysts regeneration and treatment, research and development activities
Owned(e)
McAlester, OklahomaOKCatalystsRefinery catalyst regeneration, rejuvenation, pre-reclaim burn off, as well as specialty zeolites and additives marketing activities
Owned by Eurecat S.A., a joint venture owned 50% by each of Axens Group and us(e)
Mobile, AL
Meishan, ChinaLithiumProduction of lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxideOwned
Albemarle Corporation and SubsidiariesProduction of tin stabilizers
Owned(e)
Niihama, JapanProduction of refinery catalysts
Leased(e)
Pasadena, TX(d)
Production of aluminum alkyls, orthoalkylated anilines, refinery catalysts and other specialty chemicals; refinery catalysts regeneration services and research and development activitiesOwned
Santa Cruz, BrazilProduction of catalysts, research and product development activities
Owned(e)
Takaishi City, Osaka, JapanProduction of aluminum alkyls
Owned(e)
(a)    See below for further discussion of these significant mineral extraction facilities.
(b)    Construction of Train I of the Kemerton, Australia facility was completed in the fourth quarter of 2021. Due to the ongoing labor shortages and COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions in Western Australia, Train II construction is expected to be completed in the second half of 2022. Commercial sales volume from Train I will begin in 2022 and Train II in 2023.
(c)    Since its acquisition in 2019, the Wodgina mine idled production of spodumene until the market demand supported bringing the mine back into production. MARBL recently announced its intention to resume spodumene concentrate production at this site, with the production restart expected during the second quarter of 2022.
(d)    The Pasadena, Texas location includes three separate manufacturing plants which are owned, primarily utilized by Catalysts, including one plant that is owned by an unconsolidated joint venture.
(e)    Owned or leased by joint venture.
(f)    Ownership will revert to the Chilean government once we have sold all remaining amounts under our contract with the Chilean government pursuant to which we obtain lithium brine in Chile.

Mineral Properties
Set forth below are details regarding our mineral properties operated by us and our affiliates which have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K, issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resource,” “indicated
24

LocationBusiness SegmentPrincipal UseOwned/LeasedAlbemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Mobile, AlabamaCatalystsProduction of tin stabilizersOwned by PMC Group, Inc. which operates the plant for Stannica LLC, a joint venture owned 50% by each of PMC Group Inc. and us
New Johnsonville, TennesseeLithium
Production of specialty products

Owned
Niihama, JapanCatalystsProduction of refinery catalystsLeased by Nippon Ketjen Company Limited, a joint venture owned 50% by each of Sumitomo Metal Mining Company Limited and us
Pasadena, TexasCatalysts; All OtherProduction of aluminum alkyls, orthoalkylated anilines, and other specialty chemicalsOwned
Pasadena, TexasCatalystsProduction of refinery catalysts, research and development activitiesOwned
Pasadena, TexasCatalystsRefinery catalysts regeneration servicesOwned by Eurecat U.S. Incorporated, a joint venture in which we own a 57.5% interest and a consortium of entities in various proportions owns the remaining interest
Safi, JordanBromine SpecialtiesProduction of bromine and derivatives and flame retardantsOwned and leased by JBC, a joint venture owned 50% by each of Arab Potash Company Limited and us
Salar de Atacama, ChileLithiumProduction of lithium brine and potashOwned; however ownership will revert to the Chilean government once we have sold all remaining amounts under our contract with the Chilean government pursuant to which we obtain lithium brine in Chile
Santa Cruz, BrazilCatalystsProduction of catalysts, research and product development activitiesOwned by Fábrica Carioca de Catalisadores S.A, a joint venture owned 50% by each of Petrobras Química S.A.—PETROQUISA and us
Silver Peak, NevadaLithiumProduction of lithium brine and lithium carbonateOwned
South Haven, MichiganAll OtherProduction of custom fine chemistry products including pharmaceutical activesOwned
Taichung, TaiwanLithiumProduction of butyllithiumOwned
Takaishi City, Osaka, JapanCatalystsProduction of aluminum alkylsOwned by Nippon Aluminum Alkys, a joint venture owned 50% by each of Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. and us
Twinsburg, OhioBromine SpecialtiesProduction of bromine-activated carbonLeased
Tyrone, PennsylvaniaAll OtherProduction of custom fine chemistry products, agricultural intermediates, performance polymer products and research and development activitiesOwned
Wodgina, Australia(a)
LithiumProduction of lithium spodumene mineralsOwned 60% via an undivided interest, with MRL, our co-participant in the MARBL joint venture, owning the remaining 40%
mineral resource,” “inferred mineral resource,” “mineral reserve,” “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are defined and used in accordance with subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K. Under subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K, mineral resources may not be classified as “mineral reserves” unless the determination has been made by a qualified person (“QP”) that the mineral resources can be the basis of an economically viable project.
Except for that portion of mineral resources classified as mineral reserves, mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic value. Inferred mineral resources are estimates based on limited geological evidence and sampling and have a too high of a degree of uncertainty as to their existence to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Estimates of inferred mineral resources may not be converted to a mineral reserve. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. A significant amount of exploration must be completed in order to determine whether an inferred mineral resource may be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, that it can be the basis of an economically viable project, that it will ever be upgraded to a higher category, or that all or any part of the mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. See risk factor - “Our inability to acquire or develop additional reserves that are economically viable could have a material adverse effect on our future profitability,” in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Overview
alb-20211231_g1.jpg
At December 31, 2021, we had the following mineral extraction facilities:
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

LocationBusiness SegmentPrincipal UseOwnership %Owned/LeasedExtraction TypeStage
Xinyu, ChinaAustraliaLithiumProduction of lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxideOwned

(a)GreenbushesBased on current market conditions, the Lithium49%Hard rockProduction
Wodgina mine has idled production of spodumene until market demand supports bringing the mine back into production.Lithium
60%(a)
Hard rock
Production(b)
Chile
Salar de AtacamaLithium100%BrineProduction
Jordan
Safi(c)
Bromine50%BrineProduction
United States
Kings Mountain, NCLithium100%Hard rockDevelopment
Magnolia, AR(c)
Bromine100%BrineProduction
Silver Peak, NV(c)
Lithium100%BrineProduction
25

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
(a)    Through our MARBL joint venture, we own 60% interest in the Wodgina Project. We are providing 100% of attributable value for Wodgina mineral resources based on intended marketing of 100% of the output of the mining operation to the Kemerton lithium hydroxide processing plant.
(b)    Following the Wodgina acquisition in 2019, the Wodgina mine idled production of spodumene until market demand supported bringing the mine back into production. In October 2021, our 60%-owned MARBL joint venture announced its intention to resume spodumene concentrate production at the Wodgina mine, with the production restart expected during the second quarter of 2022.
(c)    Site includes on-site, or otherwise near-by exclusive, conversion facilities. See individual property disclosure below for further details.
Aggregate annual production from our mineral extraction facilities is shown in the below table. Amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted above and are shown in thousands of metric tons (“MT”) of lithium metal and bromine production. Lithium and bromine is extracted as brine or hard rock concentrate at the extraction facilities. These are then further converted into various compounds and products at on-site processing facilities or other conversion facilities owned by Albemarle around the world. In addition, the brine or concentrate can be used by tolling entities for further processing.
Aggregate Annual Production (MT in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Lithium483 301 389 
Bromine128 131 130 
See individual property disclosure below for further details regarding mineral rights, titles, property size, permits and other information for our significant mineral extraction properties. The extracted brine or hard rock is processed at facilities on location (as described below) or processed, or further processed, at other facilities throughout the world.
The following table provides a summary of our mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, at December 31, 2021. The below mineral resource amounts are rounded and shown in thousands of MT. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted above. The relevant technical information supporting mineral resources for each material property is included in the "”Material Individual Properties” section below, as well as the in the technical report summaries filed as Exhibits 96.1 to 96.6 to this report.
Measured Mineral ResourcesIndicated Mineral ResourcesMeasured and Indicated Mineral ResourcesInferred Mineral Resources
Amount (MT)
Grade
(Li2O%)
Amount (MT)
Grade
(Li2O%)
Amount (MT)
Grade
(Li2O%)
Amount (MT)
Grade
(Li2O%)
Lithium - Hard Rock:
Australia
Greenbushes16,9001.47%16,9001.47%20,0001.05%
Wodgina(a)
22,3001.39%22,3001.39%164,0001.15%
United States
Kings Mountain, NC46,8161.37%46,8161.37%42,8691.10%
Amount (MT)Concentration (mg/L)Amount (MT)Concentration (mg/L)Amount (MT)Concentration (mg/L)Amount (MT)Concentration (mg/L)
Lithium - Brine:
Chile
Salar de Atacama7172,2116421,7471,3601,9591311,593
United States
Silver Peak, NV10152251433514563121
(a)    Through our MARBL joint venture, we own 60% interest in the Wodgina Project. We are providing 100% of attributable value for Wodgina mineral resources based on intended marketing of 100% of the output of the mining operation to the Kemerton lithium hydroxide processing plant.
The feedstock for the Safi, Jordan site, owned 50% by Albemarle through its JBC joint venture, is drawn from the Dead Sea, a nonconventional reservoir owned by the nations of Israel and Jordan. As such, there are no specific resources owned by JBC, but Albemarle’s joint venture partner, Arab Potash Company (“APC”) has exclusive rights granted by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to withdraw brine from the Dead Sea and process it to extract minerals. The resource base of bromide ion
26

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
estimated to be allocated to Jordan’s share of the Dead Sea is estimated at 354.9 million MT. JBC is extracting approximately 1 percent of the bromine available. Bromide concentration in the Dead Sea is estimated to average approximately 5,000 mg/L.
There are no mineral resource estimates at the Magnolia, AR bromine extraction site. All bromine mineral accumulations of economic interest and with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction within the Magnolia production lease area are either currently on production or subject to an economically viable future development plan and are classified as mineral reserves.
The following table provides a summary of our mineral reserves at December 31, 2021. The below mineral reserve amounts are rounded and shown in thousands of MT. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on ownership percentages noted above. The relevant technical information supporting mineral reserves for each material property is included in the "”Material Individual Properties” section below, as well as the in the technical report summaries filed as Exhibits 96.1 to 96.6 to this report.
Proven Mineral ReservesProbable Mineral ReservesTotal Mineral Reserves
Amount (MT)
Grade
(Li2O%)
Amount (MT)
Grade
(Li2O%)
Amount (MT)
Grade
(Li2O%)
Lithium - Hard Rock(a):
Australia
Greenbushes69,9001.95%69,9001.95%
Amount (MT)Concentration (mg/L)Amount (MT)Concentration (mg/L)Amount (MT)Concentration (mg/L)
Lithium - Brine:
Chile
Salar de Atacama3232,1903241,9276472,071
United States
Silver Peak, NV138849836284
Bromine:
United States
Magnolia, AR(b)
2,4975743,071
(a)    The Wodgina mine is at an initial assessment level, and as a result, contains no mineral reserves. Mineral reserve estimates are not applicable for the Kings Mountain site.
(b)    The concentration of bromine at the Magnolia site varies based on the physical location of the field and can range up to over 6,000 mg/L.
The mineral reserve estimate for the Safi, Jordan bromine site is 4.89 million MT of bromine from the Dead Sea. This estimate is based on the time available under the concession agreement with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the processing capability of the JBC plant. As only approximately one percent of the available resource is consumed, as noted above, the reserve estimate is based on the amount the JBC plant can produce over until the end of 2058, when the APC concession agreement ends. Bromine concentration used to calculate the reserve estimate from the Dead Sea was approximately 8,890 mg/L based on historical pumping.
Mineral resource and reserve estimates were prepared by a QP with an effective date provided in the individual technical report summaries filed as Exhibits 96.1 to 96.6 to this report. Differences from those amounts in the technical report summaries represent depletion from the effective date of the report until December 31, 2021. Our mineral resource and reserve estimates are based on many factors, including the area and volume covered by our mining rights, assumptions regarding our extraction rates based upon an expectation of operating the mines on a long-term basis and the quality of in-place reserves.
Internal Controls
The modeling and analysis of our mineral resources and reserves was developed by our site personnel and reviewed by several levels of internal management, as well as the QP for each site. The development of such resources and reserves estimates, including related assumptions, were prepared by a QP.
When determining resources and reserves, as well as the differences between resources and reserves, management developed specific criteria, each of which must be met to qualify as a resource or reserve, respectively. These criteria, such as demonstration of economic viability, points of reference and grade, are specific and attainable. The QP and management agree
27

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
on the reasonableness of the criteria for the purposes of estimating resources and reserves. Calculations using these criteria are reviewed and validated by the QP.
Estimations and assumptions were developed independently for each significant mineral location. All estimates require a combination of historical data and key assumptions and parameters. When possible, resources and data from public information and generally accepted industry sources, such as governmental resource agencies, were used to develop these estimations.
Each site has developed quality control and quality assurance (“QC/QA”) procedures, which were reviewed by the QP, to ensure the process for developing mineral resource and reserve estimates were sufficiently accurate. QC/QA procedures include independent checks (duplicates) on samples by third party laboratories, blind blank/standard insertion into sample streams, duplicate sampling, among others. In addition, the QPs reviewed the consistency of historical production at each site as part of their analysis of the QC/QA procedures. See details of the controls for each site in the technical summary reports filed as Exhibits 96.1 to 96.6 to this report.
We recognize the risks inherent in mineral resource and reserve estimates, such as the geological complexity, the interpretation and extrapolation of field and well data, changes in operating approach, macroeconomic conditions and new data, among others. The capital, operating and economic analysis estimates rely on a range of assumptions and forecasts that are subject to change. In addition, certain estimates are based on mineral rights agreements with local and foreign governments. Any changes to these access rights could impact the estimates of mineral resources and reserves calculated in these reports. Overestimated resources and reserves resulting from these risks could have a material effect on future profitability.
Material Individual Properties

Greenbushes, Australia
alb-20211231_g2.jpg
28

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
The Greenbushes mine is a hard rock, open pit mine (latitude 33° 52´S, longitude 116° 04´ E) located approximately 250km south of Perth, Western Australia, 90km southeast of the port of Bunbury, a major bulk-handling port in the southwest of Western Australia. The lithium mining operation is near the Greenbushes townsite located in the Shire of Bridgetown-Greenbushes. Access to the Greenbushes Mine is via the paved South Western Highway between Bunbury and Bridgetown to Greenbushes Township and via the paved Maranup Ford Road to the Greenbushes Mine.
Lithium production from the Greenbushes Mine has been undertaken continuously for more than 20 years. Modern exploration has been undertaken on the property since the mid-1980s, first by Greenbushes Limited, then by Lithium Australia Ltd and in turn by Sons of Gwalia prior to the acquisition of Greenbushes by Talison in 2007. Initial exploration focused largely on tantalum, with the emphasis changing to lithium from around 2000. In 2014, Rockwood acquired a 49% ownership interest in Windfield, which owns 100% of Talison, from Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries Inc. This 49% ownership in Windfield was assumed by Albemarle in 2015 as part of the acquisition of Rockwood. We purchase lithium concentrate from Windfield, and our investment in the joint venture is reported as an unconsolidated equity investment on our balance sheet.
About 55% of the tenements held by Talison are covered by Western Australia’s State Forest, which is under the authority of the Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. The majority of the remaining land is private land that covers about 40% of the surface rights. The remaining ground comprises crown land, road reserves and other miscellaneous reserves. The tenements cover a total area of approximately 10,000 hectares and include the historic Greenbushes tin, tantalum and current lithium mining areas. See section 3 of the Greenbushes technical report summary, filed as Exhibit 96.1 to this report, for a listing of tenements held by the Greenbushes site. Talison holds the mining rights for all lithium minerals on these tenements. The operating open pit lithium mining and processing plant area covers approximately 2,000 hectares comprising three mining leases. All lithium mining activities, including tailings storage, processing plant operations, open pits and waste rock dumps, are currently carried out within the boundaries of the three mining leases plus two general purpose leases. In order to keep the granted tenements in good standing, Talison is required to maintain permits, make an annual contribution to the statutory Mining Rehabilitation Fund and pay a royalty on concentrate sales for lithium mineral production as prescribed under the Mining Act 1978 in Western Australia. There are no private royalties that apply to the Greenbushes property. Talison reviews and renews all tenements on an annual basis.
The Greenbushes deposit consists of a main, rare-metal zoned pegmatite body, with numerous smaller footwall pegmatite dykes and pods. The primary intrusion and its subsidiary dykes and pods are concentrated within shear zones on the boundaries of granofels, ultramafic schists and amphibolites. The pegmatites are crosscut by ferrous-rich, mafic dolerite which is of paramount importance to the currant mining methods. The pegmatite body is over 3 km long (north by northwest), up to 300 meters wide (normal to dip), strikes north to northwest and dips moderately to steeply west to southwest.
The major minerals from the Greenbushes pegmatite are quartz, spodumene, albite and K-feldspar. The main lithium-bearing minerals are spodumene (containing approximately 8% lithium oxide) and varieties kunzite and hiddenite. Minor to trace lithium minerals include lepidolite mica, amblygonite and lithiophilite. Lithium is readily leached in the weathering environment and thus is virtually non-existent in weathered pegmatite. Exploration drilling at Greenbushes has been ongoing for over 40 years, including drilling in 2020, using reverse circulation and diamond drill holes.
Three lithium mineral processing plants are currently operating on the Greenbushes site, two chemical grade plants and a technical grade plant. Tailings are discharged to the tailings storage facility without the need for any neutralization process. Additional infrastructure on site includes power and water supply facilities, a laboratory, administrative offices, occupational health/safety/training offices, dedicated mines rescue area, stores, storage sheds, workshops and engineering offices. The Greenbushes site also leases production drills, excavators, trucks and various support equipment to extract the ore deposit by open pit methods. Talison’s power is delivered by a local distribution system and reticulated and metered within the site. Water is sourced from rainfall and stored in several process dams located on site. We consider the condition of all of our plants, facilities and equipment to be suitable and adequate for the businesses we conduct, and we maintain them regularly. As of December 31, 2021, our 49% ownership interest of the gross asset value of the facilities at the Greenbushes site was approximately $415.6 million.
Talison ships the chemical-grade lithium concentrate in vessels to our facilities in Meishan and Xinyu, China to process into battery-grade lithium hydroxide. In addition, the output from Talison can be used by tolling entities in China to produce both lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide.
A summary of the Greenbushes facility’s lithium mineral resources and reserves as of December 31, 2021 are shown in the following tables. This is the first period estimated mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, and reserves have been developed for Greenbushes since being acquired by Albemarle. SRK Consulting (U.S.) Inc. (“SRK”), a third-party firm comprising mining experts in accordance with Item 1302(b)(1) of Regulation S-K, served as the QP and prepared the estimates
29

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
of lithium mineral resources and reserves at the Greenbushes facility, with an effective date of June 30, 2021. A copy of the QP’s technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Greenbushes facility, dated January 28, 2028 is filed as Exhibit 96.1 to this report. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 49% ownership percentage, and are presented as MT in thousands.
Amount
Grade (Li2O%)
Indicated mineral resources:
Resource Pit15,6001.54%
Reserve Pit1,3000.64%
Inferred mineral resources:
Resource Pit11,7001.05%
Reserve Pit8,2001.05%
Stockpiles1001.40%
Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Resources have been reported as in situ (hard rock within optimized pit shell) and stockpile (mined and stored on surface as blasted/crushed material).
Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey information, and have been validated against long term mine reconciliation for the in-situ volumes.
Resources which are contained within the mineral reserve pit design may be excluded from reserves due to an Inferred classification or because they sit in the incremental cutoff grade range between the resource and reserve cutoff grade. They are disclosed separately from the resources contained within the Resource Pit. There is reasonable expectation that some Inferred resources within the mineral reserve pit design may be converted to higher confidence materials with additional drilling and exploration effort.
All Measured and Indicated Stockpile resources have been converted to mineral reserves.
Mineral resources are reported considering a nominal set of assumptions for reporting purposes:
Mass Yields (“MY”) for chemical grade material are based on Greenbushes chemical grade plant 1 (“CGP1”) life-of-mine (“LoM”) feed MY formula. For the LoM material, MY is assumed at 29.49% and is subject to a 97% recovery limitation when the lithium oxide grade exceeds 5.5%. Mass yield varies as a function of grade, and may be reported herein at lower mass yields than the CGP1 average.
Pit optimization and economics for derivation of cutoff grade include mine gate pricing of $672/MT of 6% Li2O concentrate, $4.75/MT mining cost (LoM average cost-variable by depth), $17.87/MT processing cost, $4.91/MT G&A cost, and $2.66/MT sustaining capital cost.
Costs estimated in Australian Dollars (“AUD”) were converted to US Dollars based on an exchange rate of AUD 0.76:$1.00.
These economics define a cutoff grade of 0.573% Li2O.
An overall 43% pit slope angle, 0% mining dilution, and 100% mining recovery.
Resources were reported above this 0.573% Li2O cutoff grade and are constrained by an optimized break-even pit shell.
No infrastructure movement capital costs have been added to the optimization.
Resources are reported with a cutoff grade between 0.5% and 0.7% Li2O.
Stockpile resources have been previously mined between nominal cutoff grades of 0.5 to 0.7% Li2O.
Mineral resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Amount
Grade (Li2O%)
Probable mineral reserves:
Reserve Pit67,6501.97%
Stockpiles2,2501.31%
Mineral reserves are reported exclusive of mineral resources.
Indicated in situ resources have been converted to Probable reserves.
Measured and Indicated stockpile resources have been converted to Probable mineral reserves.
Mineral reserves are reported considering a nominal set of assumptions for reporting purposes:
Mineral reserves are based on a mine gate price of $577/MT of chemical grade concentrate (6% Li2O).
Mineral reserves assume 80% mining recovery for ore/waste contact areas and 100% for non-waste contact material.
Mineral reserves are diluted at approximately 20% at zero grade for ore/waste contact areas in addition to internal dilution built into the resource model (2.7% with the assumed selective mining unit of 5 m x 5 m x 5 m).
30

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
The MY for reserves processed through the chemical grade plants is estimated by the based on Greenbushes’ MY formula and the LoM mass yield is 29.49% subject to a 97% recovery limitation when the lithium oxide grade exceeds 5.5%.
The MY for reserves processed through the chemical grade plant chemical grade plant 2 (“CGP2”) in the next three to four years is estimated by the based on Greenbushes’ MY formula for a LoM mass yield of 16.77%, and is subject to a 97% recovery limitation when the lithium oxide grade exceeds 5.5%. The CGP2 plant is going through a ramp up period where lower recoveries are expected until all equipment has been optimized and additional capital is spent.
The MY for reserves processed through the technical grade plant is estimated by the based on Greenbushes’ MY formula and the LoM mass yield is 46.18%. There is approximately 3.5 million MT of technical grade plant feed at 4% Li2O
Although Greenbushes produces a technical grade product from the current operation, it is assumed that the reserves reported herein will be sold as a chemical grade product. This assumption is necessary because feed for the technical grade plant is currently only defined at the grade control or blasting level. Therefore, it is conservatively assumed that concentrate produced by the technical grade plant will be sold at the chemical grade product price
Pit optimization and economics for derivation of cutoff grade include mine gate pricing of $577/MT of 6% Li2O concentrate, $4.75/MT mining cost (LoM average cost-variable by depth), $17.87/MT processing cost, $4.91/MT G&A cost, and $2.66/MT sustaining capital cost. The mine gate price is based on 650/MT-concentrate cost-insurance-freight (“CIF”) less $73/MT-concentrate for government royalty and transportation to China.
Costs estimated in AUD were converted to US Dollars based on an exchange rate of AUD 0.76:$1.00.
The price, cost and mass yield parameters, along with the internal constraints of the current operations, result in a mineral reserves cutoff grade of 0.7% Li2O.
The cutoff grade of 0.7% Li2O was applied to reserves that are constrained by the ultimate pit design and are detailed in a yearly mine schedule.
Stockpile reserves have been previously mined and are reported at a 0.7% Li2O cutoff grade.
Waste tonnage within the reserve pit is 459 MT at a strip ratio of 3.32:1 (waste to ore – not including reserve stockpiles).
Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Key assumptions and parameters relating to the lithium mineral resources and reserves at the Greenbushes facility are discussed in sections 11 and 12, respectively, of the Greenbushes technical report summary.

31

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Wodgina, Australia
alb-20211231_g3.jpg
The Wodgina property, which includes a hard rock, open pit mine (latitude -21° 11' 25"S, longitude 118° 40' 25"E) is located approximately 110 km south-southeast of Port Hedland, Western Australia between the Turner and Yule Rivers. The area includes multiple prominent greenstone ridges up to 180 m above mean sea level surrounded by granitic plains and lowlands. The property is accessible via National Highway 1 to National highway 95 to the Wodgina camp road. All roads to site are paved. The nearest large regional airport is in Port Hedland which also hosts an international deep-water port facility. In addition, a site dedicated all-weather airstrip is located near to site, capable of landing certain aircrafts.
The Wodgina pegmatite deposits were discovered in 1902. Since then, the pegmatite-hosted deposits have been mined for tin, tantalum, beryl, and lithium by various companies. Mining occurred sporadically until Goldrim Mining formed a new partnership with Pan West Tantalum Pty Ltd., who opened open pit mining at the site in 1989 and progressively expanded during the 1990s. Active mining at the Mt. Cassiterite pit has been started and stopped regularly between 2008 and the present. The mine was placed on care and maintenance in 2008, 2012, and most recently in 2019. In 2016, MRL acquired the mine and upgraded the processing facilities and site infrastructure to 750ktpa spodumene plant producing 6% spodumene concentrate, completed in 2019. On October 31, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in this hard rock lithium mine project and formed an unincorporated joint venture with MRL, named MARBL. We formed MARBL for the exploration, development, mining, processing and production of lithium and other minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) from the Wodgina Project. Following the acquisition, MARBL’s production of spodumene was idled until market demand supported bringing the mine back into production. In October 2021, our 60%-owned MARBL joint venture announced its intention to resume spodumene concentrate production at the Wodgina mine, with the production restart expected during the second quarter of 2022.
Wodgina holds mining tenements within the Karriyarra native title claim and are subject to the Land Use Agreement dated March 2001 between the Karriyarra People and Gwalia Tantalum Ltd (now Wodgina Lithium, a 100% subsidiary of MRL, our MARBL joint venture partner). See section 3 of the Wodgina technical report summary, filed as Exhibit 96.2 to this report, for a listing of all mining and exploration land tenements, which are in good standing and no known impediments exist. Certain
32

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
tenements are due for renewal in 2026 and another in 2030. Drilling and exploration activities have been conducted throughout the mining life of the Wodgina property.
The Wodgina mine is a pegmatite lithium deposit with spodumene the dominant mineral. The lithium mineralization occurs as 10 - 30 cm long grey-white spodumene crystals within medium grained pegmatites comprising primarily of quartz, feldspar, spodumene, and muscovite. Typically, the spodumene crystals are oriented orthogonal to the pegmatite contacts.
The facilities at Wodgina consist of a three stage crushing plant, the spodumene concentration plant, administrative offices, an accommodation camp, a power station, gas pipeline, three mature and reliable water bore fields, extension for future tailing storage and a fleet of owned and leased mine production equipment. The gas pipeline feeds the site power station to provide the power to the facilities. Water is obtained from the dedicated water bore fields. We consider the condition of all of our plants, facilities and equipment to be suitable and adequate for the businesses we conduct, and we maintain them regularly. As of December 31, 2021, our 60% ownership interest of the gross asset value of the facilities at our Wodgina site was approximately $192.2 million.
A summary of the Wodgina facility’s lithium mineral resources as of December 31, 2021 are shown in the following tables. This is the first period estimated mineral resources have been developed for Wodgina since being acquired by Albemarle. SRK served as the QP and prepared the estimates of lithium mineral resources and reserves at the Wodgina facility, with an effective date of September 30, 2020. A copy of the QP’s technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource estimates at the Wodgina facility, dated December 31, 2021, is filed as Exhibit 96.2 to this report. Through our MARBL joint venture, we own 60% interest in the Wodgina Project. We are providing 100% of attributable value for Wodgina mineral resources based on intended marketing of 100% of the output of the mining operation to the Kemerton lithium hydroxide processing plant. Amounts are presented as MT in thousands.
Amount
Grade (Li2O%)
Indicated mineral resources22,3001.39%
Measured and Indicated mineral resources22,3001.39%
Inferred mineral resources164,0001.15%
•    All significant figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates.
•    The Mineral Resource estimate has been classified in accordance with SEC S-K 1300 guidelines and definitions.
•    The Cassiterite Deposit comprises the historically mined Mt. Cassiterite pit and undeveloped North Hill areas.
•    Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources have a high degree of uncertainty as to their economic and technical feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resources can be upgraded to Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources.
•    Metallurgical recovery of lithium has been estimated on a block basis at a consistent 65% based on documentation from historic plant production.
•    To demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction of Mineral Resources, a cut-off grade of 0.5% Li2O based on metal recoverability assumptions, long-term lithium price assumptions of $584/MT, variable mining costs averaging $3.40/MT, processing costs and G&A costs totaling $23/MT.
•    There are no known legal, political, environmental, or other risks that could materially affect the potential development of the Mineral Resources based on the level of study completed for this property.
The Wodgina mine is at an initial assessment level, and as a result, contains no mineral reserves. Key assumptions and parameters relating to the lithium mineral resources at the Wodgina facility are discussed in section 11 of the Wodgina technical report summary.

33

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Salar de Atacama/La Negra, Chile
alb-20211231_g4.jpg
The Salar de Atacama is located in the commune of San Pedro de Atacama, with the operations approximately 100 kilometers to the south of this commune, in the extreme east of the Antofagasta Region and close to the border with the republics of Argentina and Bolivia. Access to the property is on the major four-lane paved Panamericana Route 5 north from Antofagasta, Chile approximately 60 km northeast to B-385. On B-385, a two-lane paved highway, the Albemarle Salar de Atacama project (latitude 23°38'31.52"S, longitude 68°19'30.31"W) is approximately 175 km to the east. The site has a small private airport that serves the project. A small paved runway airport is also located near San Pedro de Atacama and a large international airport is located in Antofagasta. The La Negra plant (latitude 23°45'20.31"S, longitude 70°18'36.92"W) has direct access roads and located approximately 20 km by paved four lane highway Route 28 southeast of Antofagasta turning north approximately 3 km on Route 5.
In the early 1960s, water with high concentrations of salts was discovered in the Salar de Atacama Basin. In January 1975, one of our predecessors, Foote Mineral Company, signed a long-term contract with the Chilean government for mineral rights with respect to the Salar de Atacama consisting exclusively of the right to access lithium brine, covering an area of approximately 16,700 hectares. See section 3 of the Salar de Atacama technical report summary, filed as Exhibit 96.3 to this report, for a listing of mining concessions at the Salar de Atacama site. The contract originally permitted the production and sale of up to 200,000 metric tons of lithium metal equivalent (“LME”), a calculated percentage of LCE. In 1981, the first construction of evaporation ponds in the Salar de Atacama began. The following year, the construction of the lithium carbonate plant in La Negra began. In 1990, the facilities at the Salar de Atacama were expanded with a new well system and the capacity of the lithium carbonate plant in the La Negra plant was expanded. In 1998, the lithium chloride plant in La Negra began operating, the same year that Chemetall purchased Foote Mineral Company. Subsequently, in 2004, Chemetall was acquired by Rockwood, and in 2015, Rockwood was acquired by Albemarle. Effective January 1, 2017, the Chilean government and Albemarle entered into an annex to the original agreement through which its duration was modified, extending it until the balance of: (a) the original 200,000 metric tons of LME and an additional 262,132 metric tons of LME granted through this annex have been exploited, processed, and sold, or (b) on January 1, 2044, whichever comes first. In addition, the amended
34

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
agreement provides for commission payments to the Chilean government based on sales price/metric ton on the amounts sold under the additional quota granted, our support of research and development in Chile of lithium applications and solar energy, and our support of local communities in Northern Chile. Albemarle currently operates its extraction and production facilities in Chile under this mineral rights agreement with the Chilean government.
The Salar de Atacama is a salt flat, the largest in Chile, located in the Atacama desert in northern Chile, which is the driest place on the planet and thus has an extremely high annual rate of evaporation and extremely low annual rainfall. Our extraction through evaporation process works as follows: snow in the Andes Mountains melts and flows into underground pools of water containing brine, which generally have high concentrations of lithium. We then pump the water containing brine above ground through a series of pumps and wells into a network of large evaporation ponds. Over the course of approximately eighteen months, the desert sun evaporates the water causing other salts to precipitate and leaving behind concentrated lithium brine. If weather conditions are not favorable, the evaporation process may be prolonged. After we obtain the lithium brine from the Salar de Atacama, we process it into lithium carbonate and lithium chloride at our manufacturing facilities in nearby La Negra, Chile.
The filling materials of the Salar de Atacama Basin are dominated by the Vilama Formation and the more recently, in geologic time, by evaporitic and clastic materials that are currently being deposited in the basin. These units house the basin's aquifer system and are composed of evaporitic chemical sediments that include carbonate, gypsum and halite intervals interrupted by volcanic deposits of large sheets of ignimbrite, volcanic ash and smaller classical deposits. Lithium-rich brines are extracted from the halite aquifer that is located within the nucleus of the salt flat. The Salar de Atacama basin contains a continental system of lithium-rich brine. These types of systems have six common (global) characteristics: arid climate; closed basin that contains a salt flat (salt crust), a salt lake, or both; igneous and/or hydrothermal activity; tectonic subsidence; suitable sources of lithium; and sufficient time to concentrate the lithium in the brine.
In the Salar de Atacama basin, lithium-rich brines are found in a halite aquifer. Carbonate and sulfates are found near the edges of the basin. The average, minimum and maximum concentrations of lithium in the Salar de Atacama basin are approximately 1,400, 900 and 7,000 mg/L, respectively. From 2017 through 2019, two drilling campaigns were carried out in order to obtain geological and hydrogeological information at the Albemarle mining concession.
The facilities at the Salar de Atacama consist of extraction wells, evaporation and concentration ponds, leaching plants, a potash plant, a drying plant, services and general areas, including salt stockpiles, as well as a fleet of owned and leased equipment. In addition, the site includes administrative offices, an operations building and a laboratory. The extracted concentrated lithium brine is sent to the La Negra plant by truck for processing. The Salar de Atacama has its own powerhouse that generates the energy necessary for the entire operation of the facilities. We also have permanent and continuous groundwater exploitation rights for two wells that are for industrial use and to supply the Salar de Atacama facilities. The La Negra facilities consist of a boron removal plant, a calcium and magnesium removal plant, two lithium carbonate conversion plants, a lithium chloride plant, evaporation-sedimentation ponds, an offsite area where the raw materials are housed and the inputs that are used in the process are prepared, a dry area where the various products are prepared, as well as a fleet of owned and leased equipment. La Negra is supplied electricity from a local company and has rights to a well in the Peine community for its water supply. We are currently constructing a third lithium carbonate conversion plant expected to be completed mid-2021, followed by a six-month commissioning and qualification process. We consider the condition of all of our plants, facilities and equipment to be suitable and adequate for the businesses we conduct, and we maintain them regularly. As of December 31, 2021, the combined gross asset value of our facilities at the Salar de Atacama and in La Negra, Chile (not inclusive of construction in process) was approximately $941.9 million.
A summary of the Salar de Atacama facility’s lithium mineral resources and reserves as of December 31, 2021 are shown in the following tables. This is the first period estimated mineral resources (exclusive of reserves) and reserves have been developed for Salar de Atacama. SRK served as the QP and prepared the estimates of lithium mineral resources and reserves at the Salar de Atacama facility, with an effective date of August 31, 2022. A copy of the QP’s technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Salar de Atacama facility, dated January 28, 2022, is filed as Exhibit 96.3 to this report. Differences from the amounts in the technical report summary represent depletion since the effective date of the technical report summary until December 31, 2021. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as MT in thousands.
35

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
AmountConcentration (mg/L)
Measured mineral resources7172,211
Indicated mineral resources6421,747
Measured and Indicated mineral resources1,3601,959
Inferred mineral resources1311,593
Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Given the dynamic reserve versus the static resource, a direct measurement of resources post-reserve extraction is not practical. Therefore, as a simplification, to calculate mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, the quantity of lithium pumped in the life of mine plan was subtracted from the overall resource without modification to lithium concentration. Measured and indicated resource were deducted proportionate to their contribution to the overall mineral resource.
Resources are reported on an in-situ basis.
Resources are reported between the elevations of 2,299 meters above mean sea level (“mamsl”) and 2,200 masl. Resources are reported as lithium metal.
Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey information.
Resources have been calculated using drainable porosity estimated from measured values in Upper Halite and volcanic, gypsum and clastic units, and bibliographical values based on the lithology and QP’s experience in similar deposits.
The estimated economic cutoff grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 670 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions:
A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $11,000/MT CIF La Negra. This is a 10% premium to the price utilized for reserve reporting purposes. The 10% premium applied to the resource versus the reserve was selected to generate a resource larger than the reserve, ensuring the resource fully encompassed the reserve while still maintaining reasonable prospect for eventual economic extraction.
Recovery factors for the salar operation increase gradually over the span of four years, from the current 40% to the proposed Salar Yield Improvement Program (“SYIP”) 65% recovery in 2025. After that point, evaporation pond recovery is assumed constant at 65%, considering the installation of a liming plant is assumed in 2027. An additional recovery factor of 80% lithium recovery is applied to the La Negra lithium carbonate plant.
A fixed average annual brine pumping rate of 442 L/s is assumed, consistent with Albemarle’s permit conditions.
Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average life of mine operating cost is calculated at approximately $3,000/MT CIF Asia.
Sustaining capital costs are included in the cutoff grade calculation and post the SYIP installation, average around $54 million per year.
Government royalties are excluded from the cutoff grade calculation as these costs are variable, depending upon price. A 3.5% community royalty is included in the cutoff grade as this royalty is fixed.
Mineral Resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
AmountConcentration (mg/L)
Proven mineral reserves:
In Situ2992,150
In Process242,685
Probable mineral reserves:
In Situ3241,927
Total mineral reserves:
In Situ6232,047
In Process242,685
In process reserves quantify the prior 24 months of pumping data and reflect the raw brine, at the time of pumping. These reserves represent the first 24 months of feed to the lithium process plant in the economic model.
Proven reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped during Years 2020 through 2030 of the proposed LoM plan.
Probable reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped from 2030 until the end of the proposed LoM plan (2041).
Reserves are reported as lithium metal
This mineral reserve estimate was derived based on a production pumping plan truncated in March 2042 (i.e., approximately 21 years). This plan was truncated to reflect the projected depletion of Albemarle’s authorized lithium production quota.
The estimated economic cutoff grade for the Project is 783 mg/L lithium, based on the assumptions discussed below. The truncated production pumping plan remained well above the economic cutoff grade (i.e., the economic cutoff grade did not result in a limiting factor to the estimation of the reserve).
A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $10,000/MT CIF Asia.
36

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Recovery factors for the salar operation increase gradually over the span of 4 years, from the current 40% to the proposed SYIP 65% recovery in 2025. After that point, evaporation pond recovery is assumed constant at 65%, considering the installation of a liming plant is assumed in 2027. An additional recovery factor of 80% lithium recovery is applied to the La Negra lithium carbonate plant.
A fixed average annual brine pumping rate of 442 L/s is assumed, consistent with Albemarle’s permit conditions.
Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average life of mine operating cost is calculated at approximately $3,000/MT CIF Asia.
Sustaining capital costs are included in the cutoff grade calculation and post the SYIP installation, average around $54M per year.
Government royalties are excluded from the cutoff grade calculation as these costs are variable, depending upon price. A 3.5% community royalty is included in the cutoff grade as this royalty is fixed.
Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Key assumptions and parameters relating to the lithium mineral resources and reserves at the Salar de Atacama facility are discussed in sections 11 and 12, respectively, of the Salar de Atacama technical report summary.
Silver Peak, Nevada
alb-20211231_g5.jpg
The Silver Peak site (latitude 37.751773°N, longitude 117.639027°W) is located in a rural area approximately 30 miles southwest of Tonopah, in Esmeralda County, Nevada. It is located in the Clayton Valley, an arid valley historically covered with dry lake beds (playas). The operation borders the small unincorporated town of Silver Peak, Nevada. Albemarle uses the Silver Peak site for the production of lithium brines, which are used to make lithium carbonate and, to a lesser degree, lithium hydroxide. Access to the site is off of the paved highway SR-265 in the town of Silver Peak, Nevada. The administrative offices are located on the south side of the road. The process facility is on the north side of the road and the brine operations are located approximately three miles east of Silver Peak on Silver Peak Road and occupy both the north and south sides of the road. In addition, access to the site is also possible via gravel/dirt roads from Tonopah, Nevada and Goldfield, Nevada.
37

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Lithium brine extraction in the Clayton Valley began in the mid-1960’s by one of our predecessors, the Foote Mineral Company. Since that time, lithium brine operations have been operated on a continuous basis. In 1998, Chemetall purchased Foote Mineral Company. Subsequently, in 2004, Chemetall was acquired by Rockwood, and in 2015, Rockwood was acquired by Albemarle. Our mineral rights in Silver Peak consist of our right to access lithium brine pursuant to our permitted and certified senior water rights, a settlement agreement with the U.S. government, originally entered into in June 1991, and our patented and unpatented land claims. Pursuant to the 1991 agreement, our water rights and our land claims, we have rights to all lithium that we can remove economically from the Clayton Valley Basin in Nevada. See section 3 of the Silver Peak technical report summary, filed as Exhibit 96.4 to this report, for a listing of patented and unpatented claims at the Silver Peak site. We have been operating at the Silver Peak site since 1966. Our Silver Peak site covers a surface of over 13,500 acres, more than 10,500 acres of which we own through a subsidiary. The remaining acres are owned by the U.S. government from whom we lease the land pursuant to unpatented land claims that are renewed annually. Actual surface disturbance associated with the operations is 7,390 acres, primarily associated with the evaporation ponds. The manufacturing and administrative activities are confined to an area approximately 20 acres in size.
We extract lithium brine from our Silver Peak site through substantially the same evaporation process we use at the Salar de Atacama. We process the lithium brine extracted from our Silver Peak site into lithium carbonate at our plant in Silver Peak. It is hypothesized that the current levels of lithium dissolved in brine originate from relatively recent dissolution of halite by meteoric waters that have penetrated the playa in the last 10,000 years. The halite formed in the playa during the aforementioned climatic periods of low precipitation and that the concentrated lithium was incorporated as liquid inclusions into the halite crystals. There are no current exploration activities on the Silver Peak lithium operation. However, in January 2021, we announced that we will expand capacity in Silver Peak and begin a program to evaluate clays and other available Nevada resources for commercial production of lithium. Beginning in 2021, we plan to invest $30 million to $50 million to double the current production in Silver Peak by 2025, with the aim of making full use of the brine water rights.
The facilities at Silver Peak consist of extraction wells, evaporation and concentration ponds, a lithium carbonate plant, a lithium anhydrous plant, a lithium hydroxide plant, a liming plant, wellfield and mill maintenance, a shipping and packaging facility and administrative offices, as well as a fleet of owned and leased equipment. Silver Peak is supplied electricity from a local company and we currently have two operating fresh water wells nearby that supply water to the facilities. We consider the condition of all of our plants, facilities and equipment to be suitable and adequate for the businesses we conduct, and we maintain them regularly. As of December 31, 2021, the gross asset value of our facilities at our Silver Peak site was approximately $60.8 million.
A summary of the Silver Peak facility’s lithium mineral resources and reserves as of December 31, 2021 are shown in the following tables. This is the first period estimated mineral resources and reserves have been developed for Silver Peak. SRK served as the QP and prepared the estimates of lithium mineral resources (exclusive of reserves) and reserves at the Silver Peak facility, with an effective date of June 30, 2021. A copy of the QP’s technical report summary with respect to the lithium mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Silver Peak facility, dated September 30, 2021, is filed as Exhibit 96.4 to this report. Differences from the amounts in the technical report summary represent depletion since the effective date of the technical report summary until December 31, 2021. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as MT in thousands.
AmountConcentration (mg/L)
Measured mineral resources10152
Indicated mineral resources25143
Measured and Indicated mineral resources35145
Inferred mineral resources63121
Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Given the dynamic reserve versus the static resource, a direct measurement of resources post-reserve extraction is not practical. Therefore, as a simplification, to calculate mineral resources, exclusive of reserves, the quantity of lithium pumped in the LoM plan was subtracted from the overall resource without modification to lithium concentration. Measured and indicated resource were deducted proportionate to their contribution to the overall mineral resource.
Resources are reported on an in situ basis.
Resources are reported as lithium metal.
Resources have been categorized subject to the opinion of a QP based on the amount/robustness of informing data for the estimate, consistency of geological/grade distribution, survey information.
38

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Resources have been calculated using drainable porosity estimated from bibliographical values based on the lithology and QP’s experience in similar deposits.
The estimated economic cutoff grade utilized for resource reporting purposes is 50 mg/L lithium, based on the following assumptions:
A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $11,000/metric tonne CIF North Carolina. This is a 10% premium to the price utilized for reserve reporting purposes. The 10% premium applied to the resource versus the reserve was selected to generate a resource larger than the reserve, ensuring the resource fully encompassed the reserve while still maintaining reasonable prospect for eventual economic extraction.
Recovery factors for the wellfield are = -206.23*(Li wellfield feed)2 +7.1903*(wellfield Li feed)+0.4609. An additional recovery factor of 85% lithium recovery is applied to the lithium carbonate plant.
A fixed brine pumping rate of 20,000 acre feet per year (“afpy”), ramped up from current levels over a period of five years.
Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average life of mine operating costs is calculated at approximately $4,900/MT lithium carbonate CIF North Carolina.
Sustaining capital costs are included in the cutoff grade calculation and include a fixed component at $2.5 million per year and an additional component tied to the estimated number of wells replaced per year.
Mineral resources tonnage and contained metal have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may not add due to rounding.
AmountConcentration (mg/L)
Proven mineral reserves:
In Situ1187
In Process1103
Probable mineral reserves:
In Situ4983
Total mineral reserves:
In Situ6084
In Process1103
In process reserves quantify the prior 24 months of pumping data and reflect the raw brine, at the time of pumping. These reserves represent the first 24 months of feed to the lithium process plant in the economic model.
Proven reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped during Years 2021 through 2026 of the proposed LoM plan.
Probable reserves have been estimated as the lithium mass pumped from 2026 until the end of the proposed LoM plan (2050).
Reserves are reported as lithium metal.
This mineral reserve estimate was derived based on a production pumping plan truncated at the end of year 2050 (i.e., approximately 29.5 years). This plan was truncated to reflect the QP’s opinion on uncertainty associated with the production plan as a direct conversion of measured and indicated resource to proven and probable reserve is not possible in the same way as a typical hard-rock mining project.
The estimated economic cutoff grade for the Silver Peak project is 56 mg/L lithium, based on the assumptions discussed below. The production pumping plan was truncated due to technical uncertainty inherent in long-term production modelling and remained well above the economic cutoff grade (i.e., the economic cutoff grade did not result in a limiting factor to the estimation of the reserve).
A technical grade lithium carbonate price of $10,000/MT CIF North Carolina.
Recovery factors for the wellfield are = -206.23*(Li wellfield feed)2 +7.1903*(wellfield Li feed)+0.4609. An additional recovery factor of 85% lithium recovery is applied to the lithium carbonate plant.
A fixed brine pumping rate of 20,000 afpy, ramped up from current levels over a period of five years.
Operating cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate. Average life of mine operating costs is calculated at approximately $5,100/MT lithium carbonate CIF North Carolina.
Sustaining capital costs are included in the cutoff grade calculation and include a fixed component at $2.5 million per year and an additional component tied to the estimated number of wells replaced per year.
Mineral reserve tonnage, grade and mass yield have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate (thousand tonnes), and numbers may not add due to rounding.
Key assumptions and parameters relating to the lithium mineral resources and reserves at the Silver Peak facility are discussed in sections 11 and 12, respectively, of the Silver Peak technical report summary.


39

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Safi, Jordan
alb-20211231_g6.jpg
Our 50% interest in JBC, a consolidated joint venture established in 1999, with operations in Safi, Jordan, acquires bromine that is originally sourced from the Dead Sea. JBC processes the bromine at its facilities into a variety of end products. The JBC operation (latitude 31°8'34.85"N , longitude 35°31'34.68"E) is located in Safi, Jordan, and is located on a 26-ha area on the southeastern edge of the Dead Sea, about 6 kilometers north of the of the APC plant. JBC also has a 2-hectare storage facility within the free-zone industrial area at the Port of Aqaba. The Jordan Valley Highway/Route 65 is the primary method of access for supplies and personnel to JBC. The Port of Aqaba is the main entry point for supplies and equipment for JBC, where imported shipping containers are offloaded from ships and are transported by truck to JBC via the Jordan Valley Highway. Aqaba is approximately 205 km south of JBC via Highway 65. Major international airports can be readily accessed either at Amman or Aqaba. Jordan’s railway transport runs north-south through Jordan and is not used to transport JBC employees and product.
In 1958, the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan granted APC a concession for exclusive rights to exploit the minerals and salts from the Dead Sea brine until 2058; at that time, APC factories and installations would become the property of the Government. APC was granted its exclusive mineral rights under the Concession Ratification Law No. 16 of 1958. APC produces potash from the brine extracted from the Dead Sea. A concentrated bromide-enriched brine extracted from APC’s evaporation ponds is the feed material for the JBC plant. Following the formation of the joint venture, the JBC bromine plant began operations in 2002. Expansion of the facilities to double its bromine production capacity went into operation in 2017.
The climate, geology and location provide a setting that makes the Dead Sea a valuable large-scale natural resource for potash and bromine. Today, the Dead Sea has a surface area of 583 km2 and a brine volume of 110 km3. The Dead Sea is the world’s saltiest natural lake, containing high concentrations of ions compared to that of regular sea water and an unusually high amount of magnesium and bromine. There is an estimated 900 million tonnes of bromine in the Dead Sea.
40

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Mining methods consist of all activities necessary to extract brine from the Dead Sea and extract Bromine. The low rainfall, low humidity and high temperatures in the Dead Sea area provide ideal conditions for recovering potash from the brine by solar evaporation. JBC obtains its feedbrine from APC’s evaporation pond and this supply is intimately linked to the APC operation. As evaporation takes place the specific gravity of the brine increases until its constituent salts progressively crystallize and precipitate out of solution, starting with sodium chloride (common salt) precipitating out to the bottom of the ponds (pre-carnallite ponds). Brine is transferred to other pans in succession where its specific gravity increases further, ultimately precipitating out of the sodium chloride. Carnallite precipitation takes place at the evaporation pond. where it is harvested from the brine and pumped as slurry to a process plant (where the potassium chloride is separated from the magnesium chloride). JBC extracts the bromide-rich, “carnallite-free” brine through a pumping station. This brine feeds the bromine and magnesium plants. There is no exploration as typically conducted for the characterization of a mineral deposit.
Infrastructure and facilities to support the operation of the bromine production plant at the Safi site is compact and contained in an approximately 33 ha area. JBC ships product in bulk through a storage terminal in Aqaba. There are above ground storage tanks as well as pumps and piping for loading these products onto ships. JBC main activities at Aqaba are raw material/product storing, importing, and exporting. An evaporation pond collects the waste streams from pipe flushing, housekeeping, and other activities. Fresh water is sources from the Mujib Reservoir, a man-made reservoir. JBC is supplied electricity from the National Electric Power Company of Jordan. We consider the condition of all of our plants, facilities and equipment to be suitable and adequate for the businesses we conduct, and we maintain them regularly. As of December 31, 2021, our 50% ownership interest of the gross asset value of the facilities at the Safi, Jordan site was approximately $210.6 million.
A summary of the Safi facility’s bromine mineral resources and reserves as of December 31, 2021 are provided below. This is the first period estimated mineral resources and reserves have been developed for Safi. RPS Energy Canada Ltd (“RPS”), a third-party firm comprising mining experts in accordance with Item 1302(b)(1) of Regulation S-K, served as the QP and prepared the estimates of bromine mineral resources and reserves at the Safi facility, with an effective date of December 31, 2021. A copy of the QP’s technical report summary with respect to the bromine mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Safi facility, dated February 7, 2022, is filed as Exhibit 96.5 to this report.
The feedstock is drawn from the Dead Sea, a nonconventional reservoir owned by the nations of Israel and Jordan. As such, there are no specific resources owned by JBC, but Albemarle’s joint venture partner, APC has exclusive rights granted by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to withdraw brine from the Dead Sea and process it to extract minerals. The resource base of bromide ion estimated to be allocated to Jordan’s share of the Dead Sea is estimated at 354.9 million MT. JBC is extracting approximately 1 percent of the bromine available. Bromide concentration in the Dead Sea is estimated to average approximately 5,000 mg/L.
The mineral reserve estimate is 4.89 million MT of bromine from the Dead Sea. This estimate is based on the time available under the concession agreement with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the processing capability of the JBC plant. As only approximately one percent of the available resource is consumed, as noted above, the reserve estimate is based on the amount the JBC plant can produce over until the end of 2058, when the APC concession agreement ends. Revenues are based on a forecast bromine price ranging from $4,570 to $8,300 per MT. At the plant process recovery of 83.4 percent (bromine from bromide), product bromine is estimated at approximately 122,100 tonnes per year. Bromine concentration used to calculate the reserve estimate from the Dead Sea was approximately 8,890 mg/L based on historical pumping.
Key assumptions and parameters relating to the bromine mineral resources and reserves at the Safi facility are discussed in sections 11 and 12, respectively, of the Safi technical report summary.


41

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Magnolia, Arkansas
alb-20211231_g7.jpg
Magnolia is located in the southwest Arkansas, north of the center of Columbia County, approximately 50 miles east of Texarkana and 135 miles south of Little Rock. Our facilities include two separate production plants, the South Plant and the West Plant. The South Plant (latitude 33.1775°N, longitude 93.2161°W) is accessible via U.S. Route 79 and paved local roads. The West Plant (latitude 33.2648°N, longitude 93.3151°W) is accessible by U.S. Route 371 and paved local roads. The decentralized well sites around the brine fields are accessed via paved Arkansas Highway 19, 98, 160 and 344.
In Magnolia, bromine is recovered from underground brine wells and then processed into a variety of end products at the plant on location. Albemarle has more than 50 brine production and injection wells that are currently active on the property. Albemarle’s area of bromine operation is comprised of over 9,500 individual leases with local landowners comprising a total area of over 99,500 acres. The leases have been acquired over time as field development extended across the field. Each lease continues for a period of 25 years or longer until after a two year period where brine is not injected or produced from/to a well within two miles of lease land areas, as long as lease rentals are continuing to be paid. See section 3 of the Magnolia technical report summary, filed as Exhibit 96.6 to this report, for a map of leases and burdens on those leases at the Magonlia site.
Bromine extraction began in Magnolia in 1965 as the first brine supply well was drilled, and additional wells were put into production over the next few years. In 1987, a predecessor company took over operations of certain brine supply and injection wells, which Albemarle continues to operate to this day. In 2019, Albemarle completed, and put into production, two new brine production supply wells in Magnolia.
In Magnolia, bromine exists as sodium bromide in the formation waters or brine of the Jurassic age Smackover Formation, a geological formation in Arkansas, in the subsurface at 7,000 to 8,500 feet below sea level. The mineralization occurs within the highly saline Smackover Formation waters or brine where the bromide has an abnormally rich composition. The bromine concentration is more than twice as high as that found in normal evaporated sea water. The bromine mineralization of the brine is distributed throughout the porous intervals of the upper and middle Smackover on the property. The strong permeability and porosity of the Smackover grainstones provide excellent continuity of the bromine mineralization within the brine.
The facilities at Magnolia consist of brine production and injection wells, brine ponds, two bromine processing plants, pipelines between the plants and wells, a laboratory, storage and warehouses, administrative offices, as well as a fleet of owned and leased equipment. Our Magnolia facilities are supplied electricity from a local company and we currently have several operating freshwater wells nearby that supply water to the facilities. In addition, both plants have dedicated rail spurs that provide access to several rail lines to transport product throughout the country. We consider the condition of all of our plants, facilities and equipment to be suitable and adequate for the businesses we conduct, and we maintain them regularly. As of December 31, 2021, the gross asset value of our facilities at our Magnolia site was approximately $772.8 million.
42

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
A summary of the Magnolia facility’s bromine mineral reserves as of December 31, 2021 are shown in the following table. This is the first period estimated mineral reserves have been developed for Magnolia. RPS served as the QP and prepared the estimates of bromine mineral reserves at the Magnolia facility, with an effective date of December 31, 2021. A copy of the QP’s technical report summary with respect to the bromine mineral resource and reserve estimates at the Magnolia facility, dated January 27, 2022, is filed as Exhibit 96.6 to this report. The amounts represent Albemarle’s attributable portion based on a 100% ownership percentage, and are presented as MT in thousands.
There are no mineral resource estimates at the Magnolia, AR bromine extraction site. All bromine mineral accumulations of economic interest and with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction within the Magnolia production lease area are either currently on production or subject to an economically viable future development plan and are classified as mineral reserves.
Amount
Proven mineral reserves2,497
Probable mineral reserves574
Total mineral reserves3,071
Reserves are reported as bromine, on an in situ basis.
The estimated economic cutoff grade utilized for reserve reporting purposes is 250 mg/L bromine, with a bromine price ranging from $4,570 to $8,300 per MT.
Recovery factors for the Magnolia are 74% and 81% for the proven mineral reserves and total mineral reserves, respectively.
The concentration of bromine at the Magnolia site varies based on the physical location of the field and can range up to over 6,000 mg/L.
Key assumptions and parameters relating to the bromine mineral reserves at the Magnolia facility are discussed in section 12 of the Magnolia technical report summary.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.
We are involved in litigation incidental to our business and are a party to a number of legal actions and claims, various governmental proceedings and private civil lawsuits, including, but not limited to, those related to environmental and hazardous material exposure matters, product liability, and breach of contract. Some of the legal proceedings include claims for compensatory as well as punitive damages. While the final outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, considering, among other things, the legal defenses available and liabilities that have been recorded along with applicable insurance, it is currently the opinion of management that none of these pending items will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
As previously reported in 2018, following receipt ofIn addition, the information regarding potential improper payments being made by third party sales representatives of our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, we promptly retained outside counselset forth under Note 17, “Commitments and forensic accountants to investigate potential violations of the Company’s Code of Conduct, the FCPA, and other potentially applicable laws. Based on this internal investigation, we have voluntarily self-reported potential issues relatingContingencies – Litigation” to the useConsolidated Financial Statements of third party sales representatives in our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, to the DOJ, the SEC, and DPP, and are cooperating with the DOJ, the SEC, and DPP in their review of these matters. In connection with our internal investigation, we have implemented, and are continuing to implement, appropriate remedial measures.
At this time, we are unable to predict the duration, scope, result or related costs associated with the investigationsAnnual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by the DOJ, the SEC, or DPP. We also are unable to predict what, if any, action may be taken by the DOJ, the SEC or DPP, or what penalties or remedial actions they may seek to impose. Any determination that our operations or activities are not in compliance with existing laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses. We do not believe, however, that any such fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief or other losses would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or liquidity.reference.
An unexpected adverse resolution of one or more of these items, however, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity in that particular period.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.NONE

Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The names, ages and biographies of our executive officers, as of February 18, 2020,2022, are set forth below. The term of office of each officer is until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual shareholders’ meeting (May 5, 2020).in May 2022.
43

NameAgePositionAlbemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Luther C. Kissam IV
55
NameAgePosition
J. Kent Masters61Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Karen G. Narwold6062Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Scott A. Tozier5456Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Melissa Anderson57Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
John C. Barichivich III5254Vice President, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer
Raphael Crawford4446President, Catalysts Global Business Unit
Netha Johnson4951President, Bromine Specialties Global Business Unit
DeeAnne Marlow54Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
Eric Norris5355President, Lithium Global Business Unit
David Ryan50Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Investor Relations
Luther C. Kissam IVJ. Kent Masters was elected as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in April 2020. He joined the Albemarle board of the Boarddirectors in 2015 and served as Lead Independent Director from 2018 until April 2020. Prior to joining Albemarle, Mr. Masters served as Operating Partner of Directors in November 2016. Mr. Kissam was first electedAdvent International, an international private equity group. Prior to our Board of Directors effective November 2011. He was electedAdvent, he served as Chief Executive Officer effective September
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

2011of Foster Wheeler AG, a global engineering and as our President effective March 2010. Previously, Mr. Kissam served as Executive Vice President, Manufacturing, Lawconstruction contractor and HS&E from May 2009 until March 2010, and as Senior Vice President, Manufacturing and Law and Corporate Secretary from January 2008 until May 2009. Mr. Kissam joined us in October 2003 and served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from that time until December 2005,power equipment supplier, when heFoster Wheeler AG was promotedacquired by Amec plc to Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Before joining us, Mr. Kissam served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Merisant Company (manufacturer and marketer of sweetener and consumer food products), having previously served as Associate General Counsel of Monsanto Company (provider of agricultural products and solutions). Mr. Kissam joined the Specialty Products Advisory Committee in April 2018 and has served as an ex-officioform Amec Foster Wheeler plc. He is also a former member of the DowDuPont Board since that time. Mr. Kissam was appointed toexecutive board of Linde AG, a global leader in manufacturing and sales of industrial gases, with responsibility for the Board of Directors of DuPont in June 2019. On February 4, 2020, Mr. Kissam advisedAmericas, Africa, and the Board of Directors that he will retire from his roles as an officer and director of Albemarle effective June 2020, for health reasons.South Pacific.
Karen G. Narwold joined us in September of 2010 and currently serves as Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Ms. Narwold has over 25 years of legal, management and business experience with global industrial and chemical companies. After five years in private practice, she served as Vice President, General Counsel, Human Resources and Secretary of GrafTech International Ltd., a global graphite and carbon manufacturer and former subsidiary of Union Carbide. She then served as Vice President and Strategic Counsel of Barzel Industries, a North American steel processor and distributor. Ms. Narwold resigned from Barzel in November 2009, after Barzel reached an agreement to sell substantially all of its assets in a planned transaction that was consummated in a sale pursuant to Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Prior to joining Albemarle, Ms. Narwold served as Special Counsel with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP and with Symmetry Advisors where she worked in the areas of strategic, financial and capital structure planning and restructuring for public and private companies. Ms. Narwold was appointed as a member of the Board of Directors of Ingevity Corporation on February 20, 2019.
Scott A. Tozier was elected as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective January 2011. Mr. Tozier also served as our Chief Accounting Officer from January 2013 until February 2014. Mr. Tozier has over 25 years of diversified international financial management experience. Following four years of assurance services with the international firm Ernst & Young, LLP, Mr. Tozier joined Honeywell International, Inc., where his 16 year career spanned senior financial positions in the U.S., Australia and Europe. His roles of increasing responsibilities included management of financial planning, analysis and reporting, global credit and treasury services and Chief Financial Officer of Honeywell’s Transportation Systems, Turbo Technologies and Building Solutions divisions. Most recently, Mr. Tozier served as Vice President of Finance, Operations and Transformation of Honeywell International, Inc. Mr. Tozier has
Melissa Anderson joined Albemarle as Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer in January 2021. Prior to joining Albemarle, Ms. Anderson served as Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Human Resources Officer at Duke Energy, an American electric power holding company based in North Carolina. Previous to that role, she held the role of Senior Vice President, Human Resources, for Domtar Corporation in South Carolina. Her previous experience also includes 17 years with IBM in progressive Human Resources leadership roles. Ms. Anderson serves on the board of Vulcan Materials and as Chair of the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM), the world's largest HR professional association. She is also a member of the advisory board for the Center for Executive Succession at the University of directorsSouth Carolina's Darla Moore School of Garrett Motion Inc. since October 2018.Business.
John C. Barichivich III was elected Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer effective November 2019. Mr. Barichivich has worked for the Company for over 12 yearssince 2007, holding various staff and leadership positions of increasing responsibility. Most recently, Mr. Barichivich served as Chief Financial Officer Vice President Finance, Purchasing, and S&OP Catalysts GBU since February 2019. Between January 2016 and February 2019, Mr. Barichivich acted as Vice President - Finance, Bromine Specialties global business unit, and he previously served as Vice President of Finance, Catalysts global business unit from September 2012 until December 2015. Mr. Barichivich was also the Director of Finance for the Albemarle shared service centers and he started his career with Albemarle as the Operations Controller for the Polymer Solutions business. Prior to Albemarle, Mr. Barichivich held a number of positions, including Director of Finance at the Home Depot, CFO Sensors SBE at PerkinElmer, and Manager of FP&A at General Electric. Mr. Barichivich began his 27 year career at
44

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Georgia Pacific, where he worked as an internal auditor and was a financial analyst supporting the restructuring of the Distribution Division.
Raphael Crawford was appointed President, Catalysts Global Business Unit in 2018. Mr. Crawford joined Albemarle in 2012 as Vice President of the Performance Catalysts Solutions unit, and the additional responsibility of Managing Director for Rockwood Lithium GbmHGmbH after the Rockwood acquisition. In 2015, Mr. Crawford was appointed President of the Bromine Specialties business unit until being named to his current role. Prior to Albemarle, Mr. Crawford served as the Director of Global Marketing and Business Development for Dow Coating Materials, a global business unit of The Dow Chemical Company. He also served as the Global Commercial Director and Global Asset Director for Dow Water and Process Solutions, following the acquisition of Rohm and Haas Company. Previously, Crawford held various strategic marketing and commercial roles at Rohm and Haas. Prior to Rohm and Haas, Mr. Crawford worked at Campbell Soup Company as a Marketing Manager. He began his career at SNET Telecommunications where he served in several capacities including new ventures, finance and marketing. Mr. Crawford currently serves onis a member of the Associationboard of directors of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) Board of Directors,association, where he hashad served as chairman of the Petrochemical Members Committee and has been elected toas a member of the Executive Committee starting in 2020.Committee.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Netha Johnson joined Albemarle as President, Bromine Global Business Unit in 2018. Mr. Johnson has more than 20 years of diverse leadership experience, both domestically and internationally, including having worked extensively in Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan, Japan and Germany. Prior to joining Albemarle, Mr. Johnson served in several progressive leadership roles with 3M Company. Most recently, he served as Vice President and General Manager, Electrical Markets Division, where he was directly responsible for 3M’s electrical and renewable energy solutions. Prior to that, he served as 3M’s Vice President, Advanced Materials Division. In this role, he was responsible for three distinct businesses comprising the Advanced Material division, which provided world-leading, innovative solutions in fluoropolymer chemicals, advanced ceramics and light-weighting materials. Preceding his business career, Mr. Johnson served as a U.S. Naval Officer.
DeeAnne Marlow joined Albemarle in 2018 Mr. Johnson has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer. In this role, she is responsible for leading the executiona member of the Human Resources’ strategic plan and key initiatives with an emphasis on business partnerships, talent acquisition and development, compensation and benefits, inclusion and diversity programs, and HR operations. Prior to joining Albemarle, Ms. Marlow served as Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer, at Greif,board of directors of Xcel Energy, Inc., a leader in industrial packaging solutions. Previously, she spent seven years with Cummins, Inc., where she led Human Resources for the Turbo Technologies business and then for the Global Power Generation business segment. In addition, she had responsibility for all Cummins operations in Central America and the Middle East including multiple manufacturing facilities, sales, engineering technical centers and general management / support. She was also responsible for marketing and sales capability development and succession across Cummins. Prior to Cummins, Ms. Marlow held progressive leadership roles with GE, SC Johnson, and Principal Financial, where she gained experience in consumer products, financial services, diversified industrials and healthcare. since March 2020.
Eric Norris was appointed President, Lithium Global Business Unit in August 2018. Mr. Norris joined Albemarle in January 2018 as Chief Strategy Officer. In this role, he managed the company’s strategic planning, M&A, and corporate business development programs as well as its investor relations efforts. Prior to joining Albemarle, Mr. Norris served as President of Health and Nutrition for FMC Corporation. Following FMC’s announcement to acquire DuPont Agricultural Chemical assets, he led the divestiture of FMC Health and Nutrition to DuPont. Previously, Mr. Norris served as Vice President and Global Business Director for FMC Health and Nutrition, and Vice President and Global Business Director for FMC Lithium. During his 16-year FMC career, he served in additional leadership roles including Investor Relations, Corporate Development and Director of FMC Healthcare Ventures. Prior to FMC, Mr. Norris founded and led an internet-based firm offering formulation and design tools to the chemical industry. Previously, he served in a variety of roles for Rohm and Haas Company including sales, marketing, strategic planning and investor relations.
David Ryan was appointed Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Investor Relations in 2018. In this role, he manages the company’s strategic planning, M&A, and corporate business development programs, as well as its investor relations efforts. Ryan joined Albemarle in April 2016 as Vice President and Treasurer after Norris is a 25-year career with West Rock Company where he held several progressive leadership roles. At WestRock, Ryan served as Vice President, Special Projects, responsible for leading the spin-offmember of the Specialty Chemicals Division intoboard of directors of Communities in Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg and is a standalone, publicly traded company. Prior to that, he served in a wide range of strategic finance roles at WestRock including, Chief Financial Officermember of the Packaging Platform and the Specialty Chemicals divisions. While with Specialty Chemicals, Ryan also served as Chief Strategy Officer and General Managerboard of the Industrial Air Purification business. He also held several positions in the Beverage Packaging, Consumer Products, and Electronic Publishing businesses.advisors of The Zero Emission Transportation Association (ZETA).

PART II
Item 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “ALB.” There were 106,206,157117,036,615 shares of common stock held by 2,3492,180 shareholders of record as of February 18, 2020.11, 2022. We expect to continue to declare and pay dividends to our shareholders in the future, however, dividends are declared solely at the discretion of our Board of Directors and there is no guarantee that the Board of Directors will continue to declare dividends in the future.
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $100 in our common stock on December 31, 20142016 and the reinvestment of all dividends thereafter. The information contained in the graph below is furnished and therefore not to be considered “filed” with the SEC, and is not incorporated by reference into any document that incorporates this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
45

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

alb-20211231_g8.jpg
stockperformancegraph2019.jpg
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.[Removed and Reserved]
The information for the five years ended December 31, 2019, is contained in the “Five-Year Summary” included in Part IV, Item 15, Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-looking Statements
Some of the information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the documents incorporated by reference, may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, which are in turn based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable based on our current knowledge of our business and operations. We have used words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “will” and variations of such words and similar expressions to identify such forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that our actual results will not differ materially from the results and expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the outlook expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement include, without limitation, information related to:
changes in economic and business conditions;
product development;
future acquisition and divestiture transactions, including the ability to successfully execute, operate and integrate acquisitions and divestitures;
expected benefits from proposed transactions;
timing of active and proposed projects;
changes in financial and operating performance of our major customers and industries and markets served by us;
the timing of orders received from customers;
the gain or loss of significant customers;
competition from other manufacturers;
changes in the demand for our products or the end-user markets in which our products are sold;
limitations or prohibitions on the manufacture and sale of our products;
46

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
availability of raw materials;
increases in the cost of raw materials and energy, and our ability to pass through such increases to our customers;
changes in our markets in general;
fluctuations in foreign currencies;
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

changes in laws and government regulation impacting our operations or our products;
the occurrence of regulatory actions, proceedings, claims or litigation;
the effects of climate change, including any regulatory changes to which we might be subject;
the occurrence of cyber-security breaches, terrorist attacks, industrial accidents or natural disasters or climate change;disasters;
hazards associated with chemicals manufacturing;
the inability to maintain current levels of product or premises liability insurance or the denial of such coverage;
political unrest affecting the global economy, including adverse effects from terrorism or hostilities;
political instability affecting our manufacturing operations or joint ventures;
changes in accounting standards;
the inability to achieve results from our global manufacturing cost reduction initiatives as well as our ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs;
changes in the jurisdictional mix of our earnings and changes in tax laws and rates;
changes in monetary policies, inflation or interest rates that may impact our ability to raise capital or increase our cost of funds, impact the performance of our pension fund investments and increase our pension expense and funding obligations;
volatility and uncertainties in the debt and equity markets;
technology or intellectual property infringement, including through cyber-security breaches, and other innovation risks;
decisions we may make in the future;
uncertainties as to the ability to successfully execute, operateduration and integrate acquisitionsimpact of the COVID-19 pandemic; and divestitures; and
the other factors detailed from time to time in the reports we file with the U.S. SEC.
We assume no obligation to provide revisions to any forward-looking statements should circumstances change, except as otherwise required by securities and other applicable laws. The following discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following is a discussion and analysis of our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017.2019. A discussion of our consolidated financial condition and sources of additional capital is included under a separate heading “Financial Condition and Liquidity.”

Overview
We are a leading global developer, manufacturer and marketer of highly-engineered specialty chemicals that are designed to meet our customers’ needs across a diverse range of end markets. Our corporate purpose is making the world safe and sustainable by powering the potential of people. The end markets we serve include energy storage, petroleum refining, consumer electronics, construction, automotive, lubricants, pharmaceuticals and crop protection and custom chemistry services.protection. We believe that our commercial and geographic diversity, technical expertise, access to high-quality resources, innovative capability, flexible, low-cost global manufacturing base, experienced management team and strategic focus on our core base technologies will enable us to maintain leading market positions in those areas of the specialty chemicals industry in which we operate.
Secular trends favorably impacting demand within the end markets that we serve combined with our diverse product portfolio, broad geographic presence and customer-focused solutions will continue to be key drivers of our future earnings growth. We continue to build upon our existing green solutions portfolio and our ongoing mission to provide innovative, yet commercially viable, clean energy products and services to the marketplace to contribute to our sustainable revenue. For example, our Lithium business contributes to the growth of clean miles driven with electric miles and more efficient use of renewable energy through grid storage; Bromine Specialties enables the prevention of fires starting in electronic equipment, greater fuel efficiency from rubber tires and the reduction of emissions from coal fired power plants; and the Catalysts business creates efficiency of natural resources through more usable products from a single barrel of oil, enables safer, greener production of alkylates used to produce more environmentally-friendly fuels, and reduced emissions through cleaner transportation fuels. We believe our disciplined cost reduction efforts and ongoing productivity improvements, among other factors, position us well to
47

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
take advantage of strengthening economic conditions as they occur, while softening the negative impact of the current challenging global economic environment.

20192021 Highlights
In the first quarter of 2021, we increased our quarterly dividend for the 25th28th consecutive year, to $0.3675$0.39 per share.
We announced the planned capacity expansion at our lithium production facility in Silver Peak, Nevada beginning in 2021. We plan to invest $30 million to $50 million to double the current production at the Silver Peak site by 2025, making full use of the brine water rights.
On February 8, 2021, we completed an underwritten public offering of 8,496,773 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a price to the public of $153.00 per share. We also granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 1,274,509 shares, which was exercised. The total gross proceeds from this offering were approximately $1.5 billion, before deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and commissions.
Using the proceeds of the underwritten public offering of shares of our common stock, we repaid the outstanding principal balances of the 1.875% senior notes due in 2021, the floating rate notes due in 2022, the unsecured credit facility originally entered into on August 14, 2019, as amended and restated on December 15, 2020 (the “2019 Credit Facility”) and the commercial paper notes. In addition, we repaid €123.8 million of the 1.125% notes due in 2025 and $128.4 million of the 3.45% senior notes due in 2029. As a result, in February 2020, we were recognized by being named torecorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $29.0 million, representing the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of this debt during 2021.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

On August 14, 2019,We announced that we have joined the Company entered intoUnited Nations Global Compact, a $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility with several banksvoluntary leadership platform for the development, implementation and other financial institutions. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at variable rates based on an average London inter-bank offered rate (“LIBOR”), plus an applicable margin that depends on certain credit ratingsdisclosure of responsible business practices, and the Company. Upon the closing of the credit facility, the applicable margin over LIBOR was 1.125%. In October 2019, we borrowed $1.0 billion under this credit facility to fund the cash portion of the acquisition of a 60% interestlargest corporate sustainability initiative in the Wodgina Project. This balance was repaid in full with proceeds from notes issued in November 2019 (see below for further details).world.
On October 31, 2019,June 1, 2021, we completed the acquisitionsale of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project and formed a 60%-40% unincorporated joint venture with MRLour FCS business to operate the mine and battery-grade lithium hydroxide production facilities. Albemarle paid $820Grace for proceeds of approximately $570 million, consisting of $300 million in cash and transferredthe issuance to Albemarle of preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary having an aggregate stated value of $270 million. The sale included our operations in Tyrone, Pennsylvania and South Haven, Michigan.
On June 30, 2021, we announced the opening of our Battery Materials Innovation Center (“BMIC”) located at the Kings Mountain, North Carolina site. The BMIC is now fully operational and will support our lithium hydroxide, lithium carbonate and advanced energy storage materials growth platforms.
On September 30, 2021, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity of Tianyuan, for approximately $200 million in cash. Tianyuan's operations include a recently constructed lithium processing plant with a designed annual conversion capacity of up to 25,000 metric tons of LCE per year.
On October 22, 2021, we announced that we signed two investment agreements in China in support of the expansion of our lithium conversion capacity. Following the agreements, we will move forward with the design, engineering and permitting plans to build aoog
conversion plant at each site, each of which has planned production capacity initially targeting 50,000 metric tons lithium hydroxide per annum. Subject to additional studies and approvals, it is expected these plants would start construction during 2022 and complete construction by the end of 2024.
Our 60%-owned MARBL joint venture recently announced its intention to resume spodumene concentrate production at the Wodgina spodumene mine, with the production restart expected during the second quarter of 2022.
We achieved earnings of $123.7 million during 2021 as compared to $375.8 million for 2020. Earnings for 2021 included an after tax gain of $330.8 million from the sale of the FCS business, but were negatively impact by an after tax loss of $508.5 million following an arbitration ruling related to a legal matter from a legacy Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (“Rockwood”) business sold to Huntsman International LLC (“Huntsman”) prior to our acquisition of Rockwood. In addition, 2021 included a $132.4 million expense related to MRL’s 40% interest in certaincost overruns of the lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton Western Australia.
On November 25, 2019, we closed the offerings on notes totaling $500.0 million and €1.0 billion. Net proceeds from these offerings were used to repay 1) the $1.0 billion balanceincluded as part of the credit facility entered into on August 14, 2019, 2) a large portion of approximately $370 million of commercial paper notes and 3) the remaining balance of $175.2 million of the senior notes issued in December 2010, and for general corporate purposes.
In collaboration with ExxonMobil, we created the Galexia™ platform, a transformative hydroprocessing suite of catalyst and service solutions for the refining industry. The platform enables an improved way of doing business, ensuring customer demands are better addressed at every stage throughout the value chain.
Announced a cost-reduction program expected to deliver a run rate of over $100 million in sustainable savings by the end of 2021.
We achieved earnings of $533.2 million during 2019 as compared to $693.6 million for 2018. Cash flows from operations in 2019 were $719.4 million up 32% from 2018.Wodgina purchase price. Earnings for 2018 included a $169.9 million after-tax gain from the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture. In addition, earnings for 20192021 includes pension and other postretirement benefit (“OPEB”) actuarial lossesgains of $21.1$43.6 million after income taxes, compared to pension and OPEB actuarial losses of $10.6$40.9 million after income taxes in 2018.2020.
Cash flows from operations in 2021 were $344.3 million.

Outlook
The current global business environment presents a diverse set of opportunities and challenges in the markets we serve. In particular, the market for lithium battery and energy storage, continues to accelerate, particularly that for electric vehicles (“EVs”), remains strong,
48

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
providing the opportunity to continue to develop high quality and innovative products while managing the high cost of expanding capacity. The other markets we serve continue to present various opportunities for value and growth as we have positioned ourselves to manage the impact on our business of changing global conditions, such as slow and uneven global growth, currency exchange volatility, crude oil price fluctuation, a dynamic pricing environment, an ever-changing landscape in electronics, the continuous need for cutting edge catalysts and technology by our refinery customers and increasingly stringent environmental standards. Amidst these dynamics, we believe our business fundamentals are sound and that we are strategically well-positioned as we remain focused on increasing sales volumes, optimizing and improving the value of our portfolio primarily through pricing and product development, managing costs and delivering value to our customers and shareholders. We believe that our businesses remain well-positioned to capitalize on new business opportunities and long-term trends driving growth within our end markets and to respond quickly to changes in economic conditions in these markets.
While global economic conditions have been improving, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to have an impact globally. We have not seen a material impact to our operations to date, however, the ultimate impact on our business will depend on the length and severity of the outbreak throughout the world. All of our information technology systems are running as designed and all sites are operating at normal capacity while we continue to comply with all government and health agency recommendations and requirements, as well as protecting the safety of our employees and communities. We believe we have sufficient inventory to continue to produce at current levels, however, government mandated shutdowns could impact our ability to acquire additional materials and disrupt our customers’ purchases. At this time we cannot predict the expected overall financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, but we are planning for various economic scenarios and continue to make efforts to protect the safety of our employees and the health of our business.
Lithium: We expect results to declinebe higher year-over-year during 20202022 in Lithium, due mainly to pricing pressure in certain markets, partially offset by productivity enhancements across our business. In addition, there is noincreased volume from new capacity coming online during 2020 to drive significant additional volume. While we completedon line from La Negra, Chile, Train 1 in Kemerton, Western Australia, and the expected acquisition of 60% interestTianyuan, which includes a lithium hydroxide conversion plant designed to produce up to 25,000 metric tons of LCE per year. We expect commercial production from this lithium hydroxide conversion plant will begin in the first half of 2022. In addition, pricing is expected to increase reflecting tight market conditions and last year’s expiration of pricing concessions on long-term contracts. EV sales are expected to continue to increase over the prior year as the lithium battery market remains strong.
We also announced agreements for strategic investments in China with plans to build two lithium hydroxide conversion plants, each initially targeting 50,000 metric tons per year. Subject to additional studies and approvals, it is expected these plants would start construction during 2022 and complete construction by the end of 2024. In addition, our 60%-owned MARBL joint venture recently announced its intention to resume spodumene concentrate production at the Wodgina Project,spodumene mine, with the production restart expected during the second quarter of 2022. In February 2022, we have madeannounced that we signed a non-binding letter agreement with our MARBL joint venture partner, MRL, to explore a potential expansion of the decisionMARBL joint venture, in an effort to idle production of spodumene until demand supports bringing the mine back into production.expand lithium conversion capacity with increased optionality and reduced risk.
On a longer-term basis, we believe that demand for lithium will continue to grow as new lithium applications advance and the use of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and full battery electric vehicles increases. This demand for lithium is supported by a favorable backdrop of steadily declining lithium ion battery costs, increasing battery performance, continuing significant investments in the battery and EV supply chain by cathode and battery producers, and automotive OEM’s, favorable global public policy toward e-mobility/renewable energy usage.usage, and additional stimulus measures taken in Europe in light of the COVID-19 pandemic that we expect to strengthen EV demand. Our outlook is also bolstered by long-term supply agreements with key strategic customers, reflecting our standing as a preferred global lithium partner, highlighted by our scale, access to geographically diverse, low-cost resources and long-term track record of reliability of supply and operating execution.
Bromine Specialties:Bromine: We expect to see modest growth inboth net sales in 2020 driven by continued strong demand in flame retardants, drilling completion fluids, and other derivatives. We expect profitability to be flat to slightly downmodestly higher in 2022 due to lower overall average selling pricesstrength in demand for flame retardants, as global bromine supplywell as benefiting from diverse end markets. Volumes are expected to up slightly compared to full year 2021 due to the successful execution of growth projects in 2021 assuming continued availability of raw materials like chlorine. Bromine’s ongoing cost savings initiatives and demand comes into balance in 2020.higher pricing are expected to offset higher freight and raw material costs.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

On a longer-term basis, we continue to believe that improving global standards of living, widespread digitization, increasing demand for data management capacity and the potential for increasingly stringent fire safety regulations in developing markets are likely to drive continued demand for fire safety products. Absent an increase in regulatory pressure on offshoreOur long-term drilling we would expectoutlook is uncertain at this business totime and will follow a long-term growth trajectory oncein line with oil prices recover from prevailing levels as we expect that deep-water drilling will continue to increase around the world.prices. We are focused on profitably growing our globally competitive bromine and derivatives production network to serve all major bromine consuming products and markets. The combination of our solid, long-term business fundamentals, strong cost position, product innovations and effective management of raw material costs will enable us to manage our business through end-market challenges and to capitalize on opportunities that are expected with favorable market trends in select end markets.
49

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Catalysts: WeTotal Catalysts results in 2022 are expected to increase year-over-year with overall refining markets and as travel lockdown conditions abate. 2021 results for both the refining catalyst and performance catalyst solutions (“PCS”) businesses were negatively impacted by the U.S. Gulf Coast winter storm in the first half of the year. Volumes are expected to grow across each of the Catalysts products. In addition, pricing is expected to increase to offset inflationary pressures in freight and input costs. In particular, we expect increased natural gas prices in Europe due to see modest sales growthpotential supply restrictions. The fluidized catalytic cracking (“FCC”) market is expected to gradually recover from the COVID-19 pandemic in net salesline with increased travel and flatdepletion of global gasoline inventories, however, demand may not return to modest growth in profitability in 2020, driven bynormal levels until late 2022 or 2023 at the earliest. Hydroprocessing catalysts (“HPC”) demand tends to be lumpier than FCC growth, partially offset by lower HPC results. Wedemand and is also expected to continue to be negatively impacted as refiners defer spending into 2022. In 2021, we initiated a strategic review of the Catalysts business to position for value creation.
On a longer-term basis, we believe increased global demand for transportation fuels, new refinery start-ups and ongoing adoption of cleaner fuels will be the primary drivers of growth in our Catalysts business. We believe delivering superior end-use performance continues to be the most effective way to create sustainable value in the refinery catalysts industry. We also believe our technologies continue to provide significant performance and financial benefits to refiners challenged to meet tighter regulations around the world, including those managing new contaminants present in North America tight oil, and those in the Middle East and Asia seeking to use heavier feedstock while pushing for higher propylene yields. Longer-term, we believe that the global crude supply will get heavier and more sour, a trend that bodes well for our catalysts portfolio. With superior technology and production capacities, and expected growth in end market demand, we believe that Catalysts remains well-positioned for the future. In PCS, we expect growth on a longer-term basis in our organometallicorganometallics business due to growing global demand for plastics driven by rising standards of living and infrastructure spending. In 2019, we announced that we have begun to pursue opportunities to divest PCS, with the expectation that a divestiture will be completed in 2020.
All Other: The fine chemistry services business is reported outside the Company’s reportable segments as it does not fit in the Company’s core businesses. We expect the near future prospects for the fine chemistry services business to be impacted by a challenging agriculture industry environment and the timing of customer orders in pharmaceuticals. In addition, in 2019, we announced that we have begun to pursue opportunities to divest our fine chemistry services business, with the expectation that a divestiture will be completed in 2020.
Corporate: We continue to focus on cash generation, working capital management and process efficiencies. We expect our global effective tax rate for 2020 to be between 18.5% and 19.5%; however, our rate will vary based on the locales in which income is actually earned and remains subject to potential volatility from changing legislation in the U.S., including the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), and other tax jurisdictions.
Actuarial gains and losses related to our defined benefit pension and OPEB plan obligations are reflected in Corporate as a component of non-operating pension and OPEB plan costs under mark-to-market accounting. Results for the year ended December 31, 20192021 include an actuarial lossgain of $29.3$56.9 million ($21.143.6 million after income taxes), as compared to a loss of $14.0$52.3 million ($10.640.9 million after income taxes) for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020.
We remain committed to evaluating the merits of any opportunities that may arise for acquisitions or other business development activities that will complement our business footprint. Additional information regarding our products, markets and financial performance is provided at our web site,website, www.albemarle.com. Our web sitewebsite is not a part of this document nor is it incorporated herein by reference.

Results of Operations
The following data and discussion provides an analysis of certain significant factors affecting our results of operations during the periods included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
Discussion of our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 20182020 compared to the year ended December 31, 20172019 can be found in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020.

Comparison of 2021 to 2020
Selected Financial Data
Net Sales
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Net sales3,327,957 3,128,909 199,048 %

$177.1 million of higher sales volume from reportable segments, primarily in Lithium and Bromine, partially offset by Catalysts
$129.9 million of favorable pricing from reportable segments, driven by Bromine and Lithium, partially offset by Catalysts
$146.0 million decrease in net sales following the sale of the FCS business on June 1, 2021
$38.2 million of favorable currency translation resulting from the weaker U.S. Dollar against various currencies

50

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Comparison of 2019 to 2018
Selected Financial Data
Net Sales
In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Net sales3,589,427
 3,374,950
 214,477
 6%
$213.1 million of higher sales volume, driven primarily by Lithium, Bromine Specialties and Fine Chemistry Services, and $76.5 million of favorable pricing impacts across all businesses
$48.1 million of unfavorable currency exchange resulting from a stronger U.S. Dollar against various currencies
$27.1 million related to the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture

Gross Profit
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Gross profit$997,971 $994,853 $3,118 — %
Gross profit margin30.0 %31.8 %
Higher sales volume and pricing in Lithium and Bromine, partially offset by Catalysts
Decrease in net sales resulting from the disposal of the FCS business on June 1, 2021
Increased production and utility costs of approximately $22 million in Bromine and Catalysts resulting from the U.S. Gulf Coast winter storm
2021 included $8.7 million of out-of-period adjustment expense in Cost of goods sold to correct misstated inventory foreign exchange values relating to prior periods. See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation,” for further details
Increased freight costs in Bromine and Catalysts
Favorable currency exchange impacts resulting from the weaker U.S. Dollar against various currencies

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Gross profit$1,257,778
 $1,217,256
 $40,522
 3%
Gross profit margin35.0% 36.1%    
Higher sales volume, driven primarily by Lithium, Bromine Specialties and Fine Chemistry Services, and favorable pricing impacts across all businesses
Higher input costs in our Lithium segment, resulting from increased toll feedstock, higher tolled volume and investments in operational excellence
Higher raw material costs, primarily in our Lithium and Bromine Specialties segments
$10.7 million related to the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture
Unfavorable currency exchange impacts resulting from the stronger U.S. Dollar against various currencies
Charges of $8.8 million related to non-routine labor and compensation related costs in Chile that are outside normal compensation arrangements and $4.9 million for the write-off of fixed assets in our Jordanian joint venture in 2018

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Selling, general and administrative expenses$441,482 $429,827 $11,655 %
Percentage of Net sales13.3 %13.7 %
$20.0 million charitable contribution, using a portion of the proceeds received from the FCS divestiture, to the Albemarle Foundation, in addition to the normal annual contributions in 2021
Higher compensation, including incentive-based, expenses across all businesses and Corporate
$11.5 million of legal fees related to a legacy Rockwood legal matter
$9.8 million of expenses in 2021 primarily related to non-routine labor and compensation related costs that are outside normal compensation arrangements
$4.0 million loss resulting from the sale of property, plant and equipment in 2021
Partially offset by productivity improvements and a reduction in professional fees and other administrative costs
$20.8 million decrease in restructuring and other expenses, and acquisition and integration related costs for various significant projects

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Selling, general and administrative expenses$533,368
 $446,090
 $87,278
 20%
Percentage of Net sales14.9% 13.2%    
$64.8 million of stamp duties levied on assets purchased related to the Wodgina Project in 2019
Higher professional fees to support planned projects
$7.4 million of increased acquisition and integration related costs, driven by the Wodgina Project, and increased severance payments as part of a business reorganization plan
$16.2 million of charitable contributions in 2018 beyond the Company’s ordinary, recurring charitable contributions

Research and Development Expenses
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Research and development expenses$54,026 $59,214 $(5,188)(9)%
Percentage of Net sales1.6 %1.9 %
Lower research and development spending in each of our businesses

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Research and development expenses$58,287
 $70,054
 $(11,767) (17)%
Percentage of Net sales1.6% 2.1%    
Lower spend in our Lithium and Catalysts segments, including the impact of the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture

Gain on Sale of BusinessBusiness/Interest in Properties, Net
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Gain on sale of business/interest in properties, net$(295,971)$— $(295,971)
Gain of $428.4 million resulting from the sale of the FCS business on June 1, 2021
$132.4 million expense related to anticipated cost overruns for MRL’s 40% interest in lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for additional information.

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Gain on sale of business$
 $(210,428) $210,428
 (100)%
Gain related to the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture, which closed in the second quarter of 2018
Interest and Financing Expenses
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Interest and financing expenses$(61,476)$(73,116)$11,640 (16)%
Decreased debt balance as certain debt instruments were repaid in the first quarter of 2021
Higher capitalized interest from continued capital expenditures in 2021
Partially offset by $29.0 million loss on early extinguishment of debt, representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of debt during the first quarter of 2021


51

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Interest and Financing Expenses
In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Interest and financing expenses$(57,695) $(52,405) $(5,290) 10%
Increased debt balance in 2019, primarily related to the funding of the Wodgina Project acquisition
2019 included a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of the senior notes issued in 2010
The increase was partially offset by higher capitalized interest from an increase in capital expenditures in 2019

Other Expenses, Net
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Other expenses, net$(603,340)$(59,177)$(544,163)920 %
$657.4 million of additional expense recorded following an arbitration ruling related to a legal matter from a legacy Rockwood business sold to Huntsman prior to Albemarle’s acquisition of Rockwood. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further details
$29.8 million increase in indemnification expenses primarily to revise an indemnification estimate for an ongoing tax-related matter of a previously disposed business in Germany
$28.8 million increase in foreign exchange activity
$7.4 million of income in 2021 from accretion of discount in preferred equity of Grace subsidiary acquired as a portion of the proceeds of the FCS sale
$7.2 million gain related to the sale of our ownership percentage in the SOCC joint venture in 2020
$78.8 million of pension and OPEB credits (including mark-to-market actuarial gains of $56.9 million) in 2021 as compared to $40.7 million of pension and OPEB costs (including mark-to-market actuarial losses of $52.3 million) in 2020
The mark-to-market actuarial gain in 2021 is primarily attributable to a higher return on pension plan assets in 2021 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S. and foreign pension plan assets was 8.42% versus an expected return of 6.50%. In addition, there was an increase in the weighted-average discount rate to 2.86% from 2.50% for our U.S. pension plans and to 1.44% from 0.86% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2021 measurement date.
The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2020 is primarily attributable to a decrease in the weighted-average discount rate to 2.50% from 3.56% for our U.S. pension plans and to 0.86% from 1.33% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2020 measurement date. This was partially offset by a higher return on pension plan assets in 2019 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S. and foreign pension plan assets was 13.15% versus an expected return of 6.52%.

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Other expenses, net$(45,478) $(64,434) $18,956
 (29)%
$11.1 million gain related to the sale of land in Pasadena, Texas in 2019
$27.0 million of legal expenses in 2018, related to products that Albemarle no longer manufactures and a previously disposed business
$15.6 million in 2018 related to environmental charges related to a site formerly owned by Albemarle
Decrease of $16.5 million in losses related to adjustments to indemnification liabilities of previously disposed businesses
Decrease in interest income of $5.4 million from lower cash balances
Increase in foreign exchange losses of $15.3 million
$4.4 million decrease from the remeasurement of the fair value of our investment in private equity securities
$27.0 million of pension and OPEB costs (including mark-to-market actuarial losses of $29.3 million) as compared to $5.3 million of pension and OPEB costs (including mark-to-market actuarial losses of $14.0 million) in 2018
The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2019 is primarily attributable to a decrease in the weighted-average discount rate to 3.56% from 4.59% for our U.S. pension plans and to 1.33% from 2.15% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2019 measurement date. This was partially offset by a higher return on pension plan assets in 2019 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S. and foreign pension plan assets was 15.82% versus an expected return of 6.72%.
The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2018 is primarily attributable to a lower return on pension plan assets in 2018 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S. and foreign pension plan assets was (4.55%) versus an expected return of 6.73%. This was partially offset by an increase in the weighted-average discount rate to 4.59% from 4.03% for our U.S. pension plans and to 2.15% from 1.94% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2018 measurement date.

Income Tax Expense
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Income Tax Expense$29,446 $54,425 $(24,979)(46)%
Effective income tax rate22.0 %14.6 %
2021 includes $148.9 million tax benefit resulting from an expense recorded following an arbitration ruling related to a legal matter from a legacy Rockwood business sold to Huntsman prior to Albemarle’s acquisition of Rockwood. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further details
$97.5 million one-time tax expense recorded for the gain on the sale of the FCS business in 2021
$27.9 million discrete tax benefit recorded in 2021 related to the indemnification estimate of an ongoing tax-related matter in Germany
Change in geographic mix of earnings
2021 includes a discrete tax expense due to an out-of-period adjustment for an overstated deferred tax liability recorded during the three-month period ended December 31, 2017

 2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Income Tax Expense$88,161
 $144,826
 $(56,665) (39)%
Effective income tax rate15.7% 18.2%    
Change in geographic mix of earnings, mainly attributable to our share of income of our JBC joint venture, a Free Zones company under the laws of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and tax discretes
The discrete net tax benefits in 2019 of $15.0 million related to uncertain tax positions, primarily from seeking treaty relief from the competent authority to prevent double taxation

Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Investments
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments$95,770 $127,521 $(31,751)(25)%
Primarily lower earnings from our Lithium segment joint venture, Talison, primarily driven by unfavorable foreign exchange impacts, partially offset by higher volumes
Increased earnings from strong operating results and other income from our Catalysts segment joint ventures

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments$129,568
 $89,264
 $40,304
 45%
Higher equity income reported by our Lithium segment joint venture, Windfield Holdings Pty. Ltd. and certain Catalyst segment joint ventures
$17.3 million charge representing our 49% share of a tax settlement between our Windfield Holdings joint venture and an Australian taxing authority, offset in Income tax expense
Approximately $2.0 million of foreign currency losses

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests$(76,270)$(70,851)$(5,419)%
Increase in consolidated income related to our JBC joint venture from higher sales volume

52

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests$(71,129) $(45,577) $(25,552) 56%
Increase in consolidated income related to our JBC joint venture resulting from the full year impact of the Tetrabrom expansion completed in second quarter 2018.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Net Income Attributable to Albemarle Corporation
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$123,672 $375,764 $(252,092)(67)%
Percentage of Net Sales3.7 %12.0 %
Basic earnings per share$1.07 $3.53 $(2.46)(70)%
Diluted earnings per share$1.06 $3.52 $(2.46)(70)%
$504.5 million, net of income taxes, of additional expense recorded following an arbitration ruling related to a legal matter from a legacy Rockwood business sold to Huntsman prior to Albemarle’s acquisition of Rockwood
Gain on sale of FCS business of $330.8 million, net of tax
$132.4 million expense related to anticipated cost overruns for MRL’s 40% interest in lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton
Increased sales volume and favorable pricing from Lithium and Bromine
Decreased recurring interest and financing expenses due to lower debt balances; 2021 included loss on early extinguishment of debt of $23.8 million, net of income taxes
Productivity improvements and a reduction in professional fees and other administrative costs
Loss of seven months of sales from FCS business following the disposition on June 1, 2021
Mark-to-market actuarial gains of $45.6 million, net of income taxes, recorded in 2021 compared to mark-to-market actuarial losses of $40.9 million, net of income taxes, recorded in 2020
Increased production and utility costs in Bromine and Catalysts resulting from the winter storms in the southern U.S.
Increased SG&A expenses, primarily related to additional charitable contribution using proceeds from the sale of the FCS business
Lower equity in net income of unconsolidated investments from the Talison joint venture
Earnings per share also impacted by the underwritten public offering of our common stock in February 2021, increasing share count by 9.8 million shares

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$533,228
 $693,562
 $(160,334) (23)%
Percentage of Net Sales14.9% 20.6%    
Basic earnings per share$5.03
 $6.40
 $(1.37) (21)%
Diluted earnings per share$5.02
 $6.34
 $(1.32) (21)%
Decrease primarily due to gain related to the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture in 2018 and increased charges resulting from the acquisition of a 60% interest in the Wodgina Project during 2019, as well as other items noted above.

Other Comprehensive Loss,(Loss) Income, Net of Tax
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(66,478)$69,850 $(136,328)*
Foreign currency translation
$(74,385)$99,832 $(174,217)*
2021 included unfavorable movements in the Euro of approximately $62 million, the Japanese Yen of approximately $8 million, the Brazilian Real of approximately $5 million, the South Korean Won of approximately $4 million and the net unfavorable variance in other currencies totaling approximately $5 million, partially offset by favorable movements in the Chinese Renminbi of approximately $10 million
2020 included favorable movements in the Euro of approximately $84 million, the Chinese Renminbi of approximately $22 million, the Taiwanese Dollar of approximately $7 million, the Japanese Yen of approximately $5 million and the Korean Won of approximately $4 million, partially offset by unfavorable movements in the Brazilian Real of approximately $19 million and a net unfavorable variance in various other currencies totaling approximately $2 million
Cash flow hedge
$174 $1,602 $(1,428)(89)%
Net investment hedge
$5,110 $(34,185)$39,295 (115)%
In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax$(45,520) $(125,195) $79,675
 (64)%
Foreign currency translation
$(62,031) $(150,258) $88,227
 (59)%
2019 included unfavorable movements in the Euro of approximately $52 million, the Chinese Renminbi of approximately $6 million, the Brazilian Real of approximately $4 million and a net unfavorable variance in various other currencies totaling approximately less than $1 million
2018 included unfavorable movements in the Euro of approximately $114 million, the Chinese Renminbi of approximately $14 million, the Brazilian Real of approximately $12 million, the Korean Won of approximately $5 million and a net unfavorable variance in various other currencies totaling approximately $5 million
Net investment hedge
$8,441
 $25,786
 $(17,345) (67)%

Percentage calculation is not meaningful
Segment Information Overview. We have identified three reportable segments according to the nature and economic characteristics of our products as well as the manner in which the information is used internally by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to evaluate performance and make resource allocation decisions. Our reportable business segments consist of: (1) Lithium, (2) Bromine Specialties and (3) Catalysts.
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following tables. The “All Other” category includes only the fine chemistry servicesFCS business, the sale of which was completed on June 1, 2021, that does not fit into any of our core businesses.

The Corporate category is not considered to be a segment and includes corporate-related items not allocated to the operating segments. Pension and OPEB service cost (which represents the benefits earned by active employees during the period) and amortization of prior service cost or benefit are allocated to the reportable segments, All Other, and Corporate, whereas the remaining components of pension and OPEB benefits cost or credit (“Non-operating pension and OPEB items”)
53

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
are included in Corporate. Segment data includes intersegment transfers of raw materials at cost and allocations for certain corporate costs.
The Company’s
Our chief operating decision maker uses adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) to assess the ongoing performance of the Company’s business segments and to allocate resources. The Company definesWe define adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest taxes,and financing expenses, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted on a consistent basis for certain non-operating, non-recurring or unusual items in a balanced manner and on a segment basis. These non-operating, non-recurring or unusual items may include acquisition and integration related costs, gains or losses on sales of businesses, restructuring charges, facility divestiture charges, certain litigation and arbitration costs and charges, non-operating pension and OPEB items and other significant non-recurring items. In addition, management uses adjusted EBITDA for business planning purposes and as a significant component in the calculation of performance-based compensation for management and other employees. The Company hasWe reported adjusted EBITDA because management believes it provides transparency to investors and enables period-to-period comparability of financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA is a financial
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

measure that is not required by, or presented in accordance with, the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP.GAAP”). Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to Net (loss) income attributable to Albemarle Corporation, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP, or any other financial measure reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Year Ended December 31,Percentage Change
2021%2020%2021 vs. 2020
(In thousands, except percentages)
Net sales:
Lithium$1,363,284 41.0 %$1,144,778 36.6 %19 %
Bromine1,128,343 33.9 %964,962 30.8 %17 %
Catalysts761,235 22.9 %797,914 25.5 %(5)%
All Other75,095 2.2 %221,255 7.1 %(66)%
Total net sales$3,327,957 100.0 %$3,128,909 100.0 %%
Adjusted EBITDA:
Lithium$479,538 55.1 %$393,093 48.0 %22 %
Bromine360,682 41.4 %323,605 39.5 %11 %
Catalysts106,941 12.3 %130,134 15.9 %(18)%
All Other29,858 3.4 %84,821 10.4 %(65)%
Corporate(106,045)(12.2)%(112,915)(13.8)%(6)%
Total adjusted EBITDA$870,974 100.0 %$818,738 100.0 %%
  Year Ended December 31, Percentage Change
  2019 % 2018 % 2019 vs. 2018
  (In thousands, except percentages)
Net sales:          
Lithium $1,358,170
 37.8 % $1,228,171
 36.4 % 11 %
Bromine Specialties 1,004,216
 28.0 % 917,880
 27.2 % 9 %
Catalysts 1,061,817
 29.6 % 1,101,554
 32.6 % (4)%
All Other 165,224
 4.6 % 127,186
 3.8 % 30 %
Corporate 
  % 159
  % (100)%
Total net sales $3,589,427
 100.0 % $3,374,950
 100.0 % 6 %
           
Adjusted EBITDA:          
Lithium $524,934
 50.6 % $530,773
 52.7 % (1)%
Bromine Specialties 328,457
 31.7 % 288,116
 28.6 % 14 %
Catalysts 270,624
 26.1 % 284,307
 28.3 % (5)%
All Other 49,628
 4.8 % 14,091
 1.4 % 252 %
Corporate (136,862) (13.2)% (110,623) (11.0)% 24 %
Total adjusted EBITDA $1,036,781
 100.0 % $1,006,664
 100.0 % 3 %



54

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

See below for a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA, the non-GAAP financial measure, from Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP, (in thousands):
LithiumBromineCatalystsReportable Segments TotalAll OtherCorporateConsolidated Total
2021
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$192,244 $309,501 $55,353 $557,098 $27,988 $(461,414)$123,672 
Depreciation and amortization138,772 51,181 51,588 241,541 1,870 10,589 254,000 
Restructuring and other(a)
— — — — — 3,027 3,027 
Gain on sale of business/interest in properties, net(b)
132,400 — — 132,400 — (428,371)(295,971)
Acquisition and integration related costs(c)
— — — — — 12,670 12,670 
Interest and financing expenses— — — — — 61,476 61,476 
Income tax expense— — — — — 29,446 29,446 
Non-operating pension and OPEB items— — — — — (78,814)(78,814)
Legacy Rockwood legal matter(d)
— — — — — 657,412 657,412 
Albemarle Foundation contribution(e)
— — — — — 20,000 20,000 
Indemnification adjustments(f)
— — — — — 39,381 39,381 
Other(g)
16,122 — — 16,122 — 28,553 44,675 
Adjusted EBITDA$479,538 $360,682 $106,941 $947,161 $29,858 $(106,045)$870,974 
2020
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$277,711 $274,495 $80,149 $632,355 $76,323 $(332,914)$375,764 
Depreciation and amortization112,854 50,310 49,985 213,149 8,498 10,337 231,984 
Restructuring and other(a)
— — — — — 19,597 19,597 
Acquisition and integration related costs(c)
— — — — — 17,263 17,263 
Interest and financing expenses— — — — — 73,116 73,116 
Income tax expense— — — — — 54,425 54,425 
Non-operating pension and OPEB items— — — — — 40,668 40,668 
Other(h)
2,528 (1,200)— 1,328 — 4,593 5,921 
Adjusted EBITDA$393,093 $323,605 $130,134 $846,832 $84,821 $(112,915)$818,738 

(a)In 2021, we recorded facility closure related to offices in Germany, and severance expenses in Germany and Belgium, in SG&A. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded severance expenses as part of business reorganization plans, impacting each of our businesses and Corporate, primarily in the U.S., Belgium, Germany and with our Jordanian joint venture partner. We recorded expenses of $0.7 million in Cost of goods sold, $19.2 million in SG&A and a $0.3 million gain in Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the portion of severance expense allocated to our Jordanian joint venture partner. The balance of unpaid restructuring costs and severance is recorded in Accrued expenses and is expected to primarily be paid through 2022.
(b)Includes a $428.4 million gain related to the FCS divestiture recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021. See Note 3, “Divestitures,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for additional information on this gain. In addition, includes a $132.4 million expense related to anticipated cost overruns for MRL’s 40% interest in lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for additional information.
(c)See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for additional information.
(d)Loss recorded in Other expenses, net for the year ended December 31, 2021 related to the settlement of an arbitration ruling for a legacy Rockwood legal matter. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further details.
(e)Included in SG&A is a charitable contribution, using a portion of the proceeds received from the FCS divestiture, to the Albemarle Foundation, a non-profit organization that sponsors grants, health and social projects, educational initiatives, disaster relief, matching gift programs, scholarships and other charitable initiatives in locations where our employees live and the Company operates. This contribution is in addition to the normal annual contribution made to the Albemarle Foundation by the Company, and is significant in size and nature in that it is intended to provide more long-term benefits in these communities.
55

 Lithium Bromine Specialties Catalysts Reportable Segments Total All Other Corporate Consolidated Total
2019             
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$341,767
 $279,945
 $219,686
 $841,398
 $41,188
 $(349,358) $533,228
Depreciation and amortization99,424
 47,611
 50,144
 197,179
 8,440
 7,865
 213,484
Restructuring and other(a)

 
 
 
 
 5,877
 5,877
Acquisition and integration related costs(b)

 
 
 
 
 20,684
 20,684
Gain on sale of property(c)

 
 
 
 
 (14,411) (14,411)
Interest and financing expenses(d)

 
 
 
 
 57,695
 57,695
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 88,161
 88,161
Non-operating pension and OPEB items
 
 
 
 
 26,970
 26,970
Stamp duty(e)
64,766
 
 
 64,766
 
 
 64,766
Windfield tax settlement(f)
17,292
 
 
 17,292
 
 
 17,292
Other(g)
1,685
 901
 794
 3,380
 
 19,655
 23,035
Adjusted EBITDA$524,934
 $328,457
 $270,624
 $1,124,015
 $49,628
 $(136,862) $1,036,781
2018             
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$428,212
 $246,509
 $445,604
 $1,120,325
 $6,018
 $(432,781) $693,562
Depreciation and amortization95,193
 41,607
 49,131
 185,931
 8,073
 6,694
 200,698
Restructuring and other(a)

 
 
 
 
 3,838
 3,838
Gain on sale of business(h)

 
 (210,428) (210,428) 
 
 (210,428)
Acquisition and integration related costs(b)

 
 
 
 
 19,377
 19,377
Interest and financing expenses
 
 
 
 
 52,405
 52,405
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 144,826
 144,826
Non-operating pension and OPEB items
 
 
 
 
 5,285
 5,285
Legal accrual(i)

 
 
 
 
 27,027
 27,027
Environmental accrual(j)

 
 
 
 
 15,597
 15,597
Albemarle Foundation contribution(k)

 
 
 
 
 15,000
 15,000
Indemnification adjustments(l)

 
 
 
 
 25,240
 25,240
Other(m)
7,368
 
 
 7,368
 
 6,869
 14,237
Adjusted EBITDA$530,773
 $288,116
 $284,307
 $1,103,196
 $14,091
 $(110,623) $1,006,664

(a)Severance payments as part of a business reorganization plan, $5.9 million recorded in Selling, generalAlbemarle Corporation and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $0.1 million and $3.7 million recorded in Cost of goods sold and Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Subsidiaries
(b)Included amounts for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 recorded in (1) Cost of goods sold of $1.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively; and (2) Selling, general and administrative expenses of $19.7 million and $15.7 million, respectively, relating to various significant projects, including the acquisition of the 60% interest Wodgina Project.
(c)Gain of $3.3 million recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses related to the release of liabilities as part of the sale of a property and $11.1 million gain recorded in Other expenses, net related to the sale of land in Pasadena, Texas not used as part of our operations.
(d)Included in Interest and financing expenses is a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million. See Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for additional information.
(e)
See “
(f)Included in Other expenses, net to revise an indemnification estimate for an ongoing tax-related matter of a previously disposed business in Germany. A corresponding discrete tax benefit of $27.9 million was recorded in Income tax expense during the same period, netting to an expected cash obligation of approximately $11.5 million.
(g)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2021 recorded in:
Selling, general and administrative expenses” on page 32 for a description of these costs.
(f)Represents our 49% share of a tax settlement between our Windfield joint venture and an Australian taxing authority, recorded in Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax).
(g)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2019 recorded in:
Cost of goods sold - $0.7$10.5 million of expense related to a legal matter as part of a prior acquisition in our Lithium business.
SG&A - $11.5 million of legal fees related to a legacy Rockwood legal matter noted above, $9.8 million of expenses primarily related to non-routine labor and compensation related costs in Chile that are outside normal compensation arrangements.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Selling, generalarrangements, a $4.0 million loss resulting from the sale of property, plant and administrative expenses - $1.8equipment and $3.8 million of shortfall contributionscharges for environmental reserves at a sites not part of our multiemployer plan financial improvement plan, $0.9 million of a write off of uncollectable accounts receivable from a terminated distributor in the Bromine Specialties segment, $1.0 million related to the settlement of terminated agreements, primarily in the Catalysts segment, and $0.8 million related to the settlement of an ongoing audit in the Lithium segment.operations.
Other expenses, net - $3.1$4.8 million of unrecoverable vendor costs outside the operations of the businessnet expenses primarily related to the construction of the future Kemerton production facility, $9.8 million of a net loss primarily resulting from the adjustment of indemnifications and other liabilities related to previously disposed businesses or purchase accounting, $3.6 million of asset retirement obligation charges related to the update of an estimate at a site formerly owned by Albemarle, and $1.2 million of non-operating pension costs from our 50% interest in JBC.Albemarle.
(h)
See “
(h)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2020 recorded in:
Gain on Sale of Business” on page 32 for a description of this gain.
(i)Included in Other expenses, net is a $16.2 million expense resulting from a jury rendered verdict against Albemarle related to certain business concluded under a 2014 sales agreement for products that Albemarle no longer manufactures and a $10.8 million expense resulting from a settlement of a legal matter related to guarantees from a previously disposed business.
(j)Increase in environmental reserve to indemnify the buyer of a formerly owned site recorded in Other expenses, net. As defined in the agreement of sale, this indemnification has a set cutoff date in 2024, at which point we will no longer be required to provide financial coverage.
(k)Included in Selling, general and administrative expenses is a charitable contribution, using a portion of the proceeds received from the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture, to the Albemarle Foundation, a non-profit organization that sponsors grants, health and social projects, educational initiatives, disaster relief, matching gift programs, scholarships and other charitable initiatives in locations where our employees live and operate. This contribution is in addition to the ordinary annual contribution made to the Albemarle Foundation by the Company, and is significant in size and nature in that it is intended to provide more long-term benefits in the communities where we live and operate.
(l)Included in Other expenses, net is $19.7 million related to the proposed settlement of an ongoing audit of a previously disposed business in Germany, and $5.5 million related to the adjustment of indemnifications previously recorded from disposed businesses.
(m)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2018 recorded in:
Cost of goods sold - $4.9$1.3 million for the write-off of fixed assetsexpense related to a major capacity expansionlegal matter as part of a prior acquisition in our Jordanian joint venture and $8.8 million related to non-routine labor and compensation related costs in Chile that are outside normal compensation arrangements.Lithium business.
Selling, general and administrative expensesSG&A - $2.3$3.1 million of shortfall contributions for our multiemployer plan financial improvement plan and $3.8 million of a $1.2 million contribution, using a portionnet expense primarily relating to the increase of the proceeds received from the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture, to schools in the state of Louisiana for qualified tuition purposes. This contribution is significant in size and is intended to provide long-term benefits for families in the Louisiana community. This was partially offset by a $1.5 million gain related to a refund from Chilean authorities due to an overpayment made in a prior year.environmental reserves at non-operating businesses we have previously divested.
Other expenses, net - $1.5$7.2 million gain related to the reversalsale of our ownership percentage in the SOCC joint venture, $3.6 million of a net gain primarily relating to the sale of intangible assets in our Bromine business and property in Germany not used as part of our operations and a $2.5 million net gain resulting from the settlement of legal matters related to a business sold or a site in the process of being sold, partially offset by $9.6 million of losses resulting from the adjustment of indemnifications related to previously recorded liabilitiesdisposed businesses and $1.2 million of disposed businesses.expenses related to other costs outside of our regular operations.

Lithium
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Net sales$1,363,284 $1,144,778 $218,506 19 %
$174.8 million of higher sales volume, driven by strength in both carbonate and hydroxide
$22.1 million of favorable pricing impacts, primarily in battery- and tech-grade carbonate and hydroxide due to higher pricing under certain contracts and mix
$21.6 million of favorable currency translation resulting from the weaker U.S. Dollar against various currencies
Adjusted EBITDA$479,538 $393,093 $86,445 22 %
Higher sales volume and favorable pricing impacts
Increased SG&A expenses from higher compensation, professional fees and other administrative costs
Productivity improvements, offsetting the impact of inflation
Lower equity in net income of unconsolidated investments from the Talison joint venture
$4.4 million out-of-period adjustment expense recorded in Cost of goods sold to correct misstated inventory foreign exchange values relating to prior year periods
$4.1 million of unfavorable currency translation resulting from a stronger Chilean Peso

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Net sales$1,358,170
 $1,228,171
 $129,999
 11 %
$151.6 million in higher sales volume, primarily in battery-grade lithium hydroxide due to continued strong demand
Pricing was effectively flat due to favorable price/mix in battery-grade hydroxide, offset by the impact of lower prices in China on battery-grade and technical- grade sales
$22.5 million of unfavorable currency translation resulting from the stronger U.S. Dollar against various currencies
Adjusted EBITDA$524,934
 $530,773
 $(5,839) (1)%
Increased cost of goods sold, mainly related to higher tolled product volumes to meet customer commitments
Higher sales volume, primarily in battery-grade lithium hydroxide
$8.7 million of favorable currency translation resulting from a weaker Chilean Peso
Bromine
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Net sales$1,128,343 $964,962 $163,381 17 %
$108.7 million of favorable pricing impacts, primarily in the flame retardants division and as a result of a favorable 2021 customer mix
$45.1 million of higher sales volume related to increased demand across all products
$9.6 million of favorable currency translation resulting from the weaker U.S. Dollar against various currencies
Adjusted EBITDA$360,682 $323,605 $37,077 11 %
Higher sales volume and favorable pricing impacts as a result of a favorable 2021 customer mix
Productivity improvements and a reduction in professional fees and other administrative costs
Increased raw material prices, primarily due to shortage of available chlorine
Increased production and utility costs of approximately $6 million resulting from the U.S. Gulf Coast winter storm
Increased freight costs
$8.7 million of favorable currency translation resulting from the weaker U.S. Dollar against various currencies

Bromine Specialties
In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Net sales$1,004,216
 $917,880
 $86,336
 9%
$46.7 million in higher sales volume and $48.5 million in favorable pricing impacts in flame retardants and other bromine derivatives due to continued strong demand
$8.8 million of unfavorable currency translation resulting from the stronger U.S. Dollar against various currencies
Adjusted EBITDA$328,457
 $288,116
 $40,341
 14%
Higher sales volume and favorable pricing impacts
Higher production and raw material costs
$5.8 million of unfavorable currency translation

56

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Catalysts
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Net sales$761,235 $797,914 $(36,679)(5)%
$42.7 million of lower sales volume, primarily from lower demand in clean fuel technologies
$0.9 million of unfavorable pricing impacts, primarily in FCC, partially offset by PCS
$6.9 million of favorable currency translation resulting from the weaker U.S. Dollar against various currencies
Adjusted EBITDA$106,941 $130,134 $(23,193)(18)%
Lower sales volume, primarily from lower demand in clean fuel technologies, as well as unfavorable pricing impacts, primarily in FCC
Increased production and utility costs of approximately $16 million resulting from the U.S. Gulf Coast winter storm
$3.1 million out-of-period adjustment expense recorded in Cost of goods sold to correct misstated inventory foreign exchange values relating to prior year periods
Increased raw material and freight costs
Partially offset by productivity improvements and a reduction in professional fees and other administrative costs
$19 million of government grants from the Netherlands in response to losses during the COVID-19 pandemic
Catalysts
In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Net sales$1,061,817
 $1,101,554
 $(39,737) (4)%
$27.1 million impact of the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture
$16.9 million of unfavorable currency translation resulting from the stronger U.S. Dollar against various currencies
$21.4 million of lower sales volume, primarily related to delays in the start-up of new FCC units and the loss of certain customers in PCS, partially offset by sales volume increases in CFT
$25.4 million of favorable pricing impacts, primarily in FCC and CFT
Adjusted EBITDA$270,624
 $284,307
 $(13,683) (5)%
$10.9 million impact of the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture
Higher raw material costs in our CFT division, as well as lower sales volume in FCC and PCS
$10.9 million of unfavorable currency translation resulting from the stronger U.S. Dollar against various currencies
Favorable pricing impacts
Partial insurance claim reimbursement of $4.2 million received in 2018

All Other
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Net sales$75,095 $221,255 $(146,160)(66)%
Primarily decreased volume resulting from the sale of the FCS business in the second quarter of 2021
Adjusted EBITDA$29,858 $84,821 $(54,963)(65)%
Primarily decreased volume resulting from the sale of the FCS business in the second quarter of 2021

In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Net sales$165,224
 $127,186
 $38,038
 30%
Higher sales volume and favorable pricing impacts in our fine chemistry services business
Adjusted EBITDA$49,628
 $14,091
 $35,537
 252%
Higher sales volume and favorable pricing impacts in our fine chemistry services business
$4.4 million decrease from the remeasurement of the fair value of our investment in private equity securities
Corporate
In thousands20212020$ Change% Change
Adjusted EBITDA$(106,045)$(112,915)$6,870 (6)%
$5.3 million of favorable currency exchange impacts, including a $23.5 million decrease in foreign currency impacts from our Talison joint venture
Productivity improvements and a reduction in professional fees and other administrative costs
Increase in incentive compensation costs

Corporate
In thousands2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Adjusted EBITDA$(136,862) $(110,623) $(26,239) 24%
Higher selling, general and administrative spending related to professional fees to support planned projects
$18.9 million of unfavorable currency exchange impacts

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Estimates, Assumptions and Reclassifications
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Listed below are the estimates and assumptions that we consider to be critical in the preparation of our financial statements.
Property, Plant and Equipment. We assign the useful lives of our property, plant and equipment based upon our internal engineering estimates which are reviewed periodically. The estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment range from two to sixty years and depreciation is recorded on the straight-line method, with the exception of our mineral rights and reserves, which are depleted on a units-of-production method. We evaluate the recovery of our property, plant and equipment by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized.
Acquisition Method of Accounting. We recognize the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition for acquired businesses. Determining the fair value of these items requires management’s judgment and the utilization of independent valuation specialists and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the timing and amounts of future cash flows and discount rates, among other items. When acquiring mineral reserves, the fair value is estimated using an excess earnings approach, which requires management to estimate future cash flows, net of capital investments in the specific operation. Management’s cash flow projections involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the
57

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
expected production of the mine over the estimated time period, sales prices, shipment volumes, and expected profit margins.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

The present value of the projected net cash flows represents the preliminary fair value assigned to mineral reserves. The discount rate is a significant assumption used in the valuation model. The judgments made in the determination of the estimated fair value assigned to the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the investee, as well as the estimated useful life of each asset and the duration of each liability, can materially impact the financial statements in periods after acquisition, such as through depreciation and amortization expense. For more information on our acquisitions and application of the acquisition method, see Note 2, “Acquisitions,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Income Taxes. We assume the deductibility of certain costs in our income tax filings, and we estimate the future recovery of deferred tax assets, uncertain tax positions and indefinite investment assertions.
Environmental Remediation Liabilities. We estimate and accrue the costs required to remediate a specific site depending on site-specific facts and circumstances. Cost estimates to remediate each specific site are developed by assessing (i) the scope of our contribution to the environmental matter, (ii) the scope of the anticipated remediation and monitoring plan and (iii) the extent of other parties’ share of responsibility.
Actual results could differ materially from the estimates and assumptions that we use in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services, and is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied under the terms of contracts with our customers. A performance obligation is deemed to be satisfied when control of the product or service is transferred to our customer. The transaction price of a contract, or the amount we expect to receive upon satisfaction of all performance obligations, is determined by reference to the contract’s terms and includes adjustments, if applicable, for any variable consideration, such as customer rebates, noncash consideration or consideration payable to the customer, although these adjustments are generally not material. Where a contract contains more than one distinct performance obligation, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price of each performance obligation, although these situations do not occur frequently and are generally not built into our contracts. Any unsatisfied performance obligations are not material. Standalone selling prices are based on prices we charge to our customers, which in some cases is based on established market prices. Sales and other similar taxes collected from customers on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue. Our payment terms are generally between 30 to 90 days, however, they vary by market factors, such as customer size, creditworthiness, geography and competitive environment.
All of our revenue is derived from contracts with customers, and almost all of our contracts with customers contain one performance obligation for the transfer of goods where such performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time. Control of a product is deemed to be transferred to the customer upon shipment or delivery. Significant portions of our sales are sold free on board shipping point or on an equivalent basis, while delivery terms of other transactions are based upon specific contractual arrangements. Our standard terms of delivery are generally included in our contracts of sale, order confirmation documents and invoices, while the timing between shipment and delivery generally ranges between 1 and 45 days. Costs for shipping and handling activities, whether performed before or after the customer obtains control of the goods, are accounted for as fulfillment costs.
The Company currently utilizes the following practical expedients, as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
All sales and other pass-through taxes are excluded from contract value;
In utilizing the modified retrospective transition method, no adjustment was necessary for contracts that did not cross over the reporting year;
We will not consider the possibility of a contract having a significant financing component (which would effectively attribute a portion of the sales price to interest income) unless, if at contract inception, the expected payment terms (from time of delivery or other relevant criterion) are more than one year;
If our right to customer payment is directly related to the value of our completed performance, we recognize revenue consistent with the invoicing right; and
We expense as incurred all costs of obtaining a contract incremental to any costs/compensation attributable to individual product sales/shipments for contracts where the amortization period for such costs would otherwise be one year or less.
58

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Certain products we produce are made to our customer’s specifications where such products have no alternative use or would need significant rework costs in order to be sold to another customer. In management’s judgment, control of these arrangements is transferred to the customer at a point in time (upon shipment or delivery) and not over the time they are produced. Therefore revenue is recognized upon shipment or delivery of these products.
Costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers are not significant and are expensed immediately as the amortization period would be one year or less. When the Company incurs pre-production or other fulfillment costs in connection with an existing or specific anticipated contract and such costs are recoverable through margin or explicitly reimbursable, such costs are capitalized and amortized to Cost of goods sold on a systematic basis that is consistent with the pattern of transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates, which is less than one year. We record bad debt expense in specific situations when we determine the customer is unable to meet its financial obligation.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and other intangibles acquired in a business combination in conformity with current accounting guidance which requires goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets to not be amortized.
We test goodwill for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of our reporting units to the related carrying value. Our reporting units are either our operating business segments or one level below our operating business segments for which discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed by the business management. WeIn applying the goodwill impairment test, we initially perform a qualitative test (“Step 0”), where we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance of the reporting units and other entity and reporting unit specific events. If after assessing these qualitative factors, we determine it is “more-likely-than-not” that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we perform a quantitative test (“Step 1”). During Step 1, we estimate the fair value based on present value techniques involving future cash flows. Future cash flows for all reporting units include assumptions about sales volumes, selling prices, raw material prices, labor and other employee benefit costs, capital additions, income taxes, working capital, andrevenue growth rates, adjusted EBITDA margins, discount rate as well as other economic or market-relatedindustry-related factors. For the Refining Solutions reporting unit, the revenue growth rates and adjusted EBITDA margins were deemed to be significant assumptions. Significant management judgment is involved in estimating these variables and they include inherent uncertainties since they are forecasting future events. We perform a sensitivity analysis by using a range of inputs to confirm the reasonableness of these estimates being used in the goodwill impairment analysis. We use a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) approach to determine our discount rate for goodwill recoverability testing. Our WACC calculation incorporates industry-weighted average returns on debt and equity from a market perspective. The factors in this calculation are largely external to the CompanyAlbemarle and, therefore, are beyond our control. We test our recorded goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year or upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying amounts. The CompanyWe performed itsour annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 20192021 and no evidence of impairment was noted from the analysis. As a result, we concluded there was no impairment as of that date. In addition, no material indications of impairment in any of our reporting units were indicated by the sensitivity analysis.
We assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names and trademarks, for impairment annually and between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment standard allows us to first assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only required if we determine, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If we determine based on the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, an impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to its carrying amount. During the year ended December 31, 2021, no evidence of impairment was noted from the analysis for our indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Definite-lived intangible assets, such as purchased technology, patents and customer lists, are amortized over their estimated useful lives generally for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years. Except for customer lists and relationships associated with the majority of our Lithium business, which are amortized using the pattern of economic benefit method, definite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method. We evaluate the recovery of our definite-lived intangible assets by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. See Note 12, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

59

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Resource Development Expenses
We incur costs in resource exploration, evaluation and development during the different phases of our resource development projects. Exploration costs incurred before obtaining legal rights to explore an areathe declaration of proven and probable resources are generally expensed as incurred. After obtaining legal rights, exploration costs are expensed in areas where we have uncertainty about obtaining proven resources. In areas where we have substantial knowledge about the area and consider it probable to obtain commercially viable proven resources, exploration and evaluation costs are capitalized.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

If technical feasibility studies have been obtained, resource evaluation expenses are capitalized when the study demonstrates proven or probable resources for which future economic returns are expected, whiledeclared, exploration, evaluation and development costs for projects that are not considered viable are expensed. Development costs that are necessary to bring the property to commercial productioncapacity or increase the capacity or useful life are capitalized. CostsAny costs to maintain the production capacity in a property under production are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized resource costs are depleted using the units-of-production method. Our resource development assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
Under authoritative accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets. As required, we recognize a balance sheet asset or liability for each of our pension and OPEB plans equal to the plan’s funded status as of the measurement date. The primary assumptions are as follows:
Discount Rate—The discount rate is used in calculating the present value of benefits, which is based on projections of benefit payments to be made in the future.
Expected Return on Plan Assets—We project the future return on plan assets based on prior performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plans as well as the expected long-term allocation of plan assets for these investments. These projected returns reduce the net benefit costs recorded currently.
Rate of Compensation Increase—For salary-related plans, we project employees’ annual pay increases, which are used to project employees’ pension benefits at retirement.
Mortality Assumptions—Assumptions about life expectancy of plan participants are used in the measurement of related plan obligations.
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized annually in our consolidated statements of income in the fourth quarter and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for a remeasurement during a fiscal year. The remaining components of pension and OPEB plan expense, primarily service cost, interest cost and expected return on assets, are recorded on a monthly basis. The market-related value of assets equals the actual market value as of the date of measurement.
During 2019,2021, we made changes to assumptions related to discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets. We consider available information that we deem relevant when selecting each of these assumptions.
Our U.S. defined benefit plans for non-represented employees are closed to new participants, with no additional benefits accruing under these plans as participants’ accrued benefits have been frozen. In selecting the discount rates for the U.S. plans, we consider expected benefit payments on a plan-by-plan basis. As a result, the Company uses different discount rates for each plan depending on the demographics of participants and the expected timing of benefit payments. For 2019,2021, the discount rates were calculated using the results from a bond matching technique developed by Milliman, which matched the future estimated annual benefit payments of each respective plan against a portfolio of bonds of high quality to determine the discount rate. We believe our selected discount rates are determined using preferred methodology under authoritative accounting guidance and accurately reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 20192021 measurement date.
In selecting the discount rates for the foreign plans, we look at long-term yields on AA-rated corporate bonds when available. Our actuaries have developed yield curves based on the yields of constituent bonds in the various indices as well as on other market indicators such as swap rates, particularly at the longer durations. For the Eurozone, we apply the Aon Hewitt yield curve to projected cash flows from the relevant plans to derive the discount rate. For the U.K., the discount rate is determined by applying the Aon Hewitt yield curve for typical schemes of similar duration to projected cash flows of Albemarle’s U.K. plan. In other countries where there is not a sufficiently deep market of high-quality corporate bonds, we set the discount rate by referencing the yield on government bonds of an appropriate duration.
At December 31, 2019,2021, the weighted-average discount rate for the U.S. and foreign pension plans decreased to 3.56%2.86% and 1.33%1.44%, respectively, from 4.59%2.50% and 2.15%0.86%, respectively, at December 31, 20182020 to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 20192021 measurement date. The discount rate for the OPEB plans at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 was 3.53%2.85% and 4.55%2.49%, respectively.
In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we consider past performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plan as well as the expected long-term allocations of plan assets to these investments. For the years 20192021 and 2018,2020, the weighted-average expected rate of return on U.S. pension plan assets was 6.89%6.88%, and the weighted-average
60

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
expected rate of return on foreign pension plan assets was 5.51%3.98% and 5.52%4.07%, respectively. Effective January 1, 2020,2022, the weighted-average expected rate of return on U.S. and foreign pension plan assets is 6.88%6.89% and 4.07%3.85%, respectively.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

In projecting the rate of compensation increase, we consider past experience in light of movements in inflation rates. At December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the assumed weighted-average rate of compensation increase was 3.72%3.20% and 3.63%3.82%, respectively, for our foreign pension plans.

In October 2018,For thethe Society of Actuaries (“SOA”) published an updated Mortality Improvement Scale, MP-2018. The updated Improvement Scale incorporates an additional year of mortality data (2016). We utilized the same base mortality, SOA RP-2014 Adjusted to 2006 Total Dataset Mortality, but we revised our mortality assumption to incorporate the MP-2018 Mortality Improvement Scale for purposes of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December 31, 2018. In October 2019, the SOA published the Pri-2012 Mortality Tables and an updated Improvement Scale, MP-2019. The Pri-2012 Mortality Tables are an update to the RP-2014 Adjusted to 2006 Total Dataset Mortality while the updated improvement scale incorporates an additional year of mortality data (2017). We revised both the base mortality tables and mortality improvement assumption by incorporating both the Pri-2012 Mortality Tables and MP-2019 Mortality Improvement Scale for purpose of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December 31, 2019.2021 and 2020, we used the Pri-2012 Mortality Tables along with the MP-2021 and MP-2020 Mortality Improvement Scale, respectively, published by the SOA.
At December 31, 2019,2021, the assumed rate of increase in the pre-65 and post-65 per capita cost of covered health care benefits for U.S. retirees was zero as the employer-paid premium caps (pre-65 and post-65) were met starting January 1, 2013.
A variance in the assumptions discussed above would have an impact on the projected benefit obligations, the accrued OPEB liabilities, and the annual net periodic pension and OPEB cost. The following table reflects the sensitivities associated with a hypothetical change in certain assumptions, primarily in the U.S. (in thousands):
(Favorable) Unfavorable(Favorable) Unfavorable
1% Increase 1% Decrease1% Increase1% Decrease
Increase (Decrease)
in  Benefit Obligation
 
Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Cost
 
Increase (Decrease)
in  Benefit Obligation
 
Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Cost
Increase (Decrease)
in  Benefit Obligation
Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Cost
Increase (Decrease)
in  Benefit Obligation
Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Cost
Actuarial Assumptions       Actuarial Assumptions
Discount Rate:       Discount Rate:
Pension$(103,167) $4,733
 $125,286
 $(6,286)Pension$(104,285)$4,919 $120,116 $(6,514)
Other postretirement benefits$(5,070) $289
 $6,058
 $(363)Other postretirement benefits$(4,520)$276 $5,414 $(348)
Expected return on plan assets:       Expected return on plan assets:
Pension
 $(6,183) 
 $6,183
Pension$(6,796)$6,796 
Other postretirement benefits
 $
 
 $
Other postretirement benefits$— $— 
* Not applicable.
Of the $638.1$700.2 million total pension and postretirement assets at December 31, 2019, $73.82021, $96.3 million, or approximately 12%14%, are measured using the net asset value as a practical expedient. Gains or losses attributable to these assets are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as either an increase or decrease in plan assets. See Note 15, “Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Income Taxes
We use the liability method for determining our income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. In order to record deferred tax assets and liabilities, we are following guidance under ASU 2015-17, which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet, along with any related valuation allowance. Tax effects are released from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income using either the specific identification approach or the portfolio approach based on the nature of the underlying item.
Deferred income taxes are provided for the estimated income tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also provided for operating losses, capital losses and certain tax credit carryovers. A valuation allowance, reducing deferred tax assets, is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of such deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character. Although realization is not assured, we do not establish a valuation allowance when we believe it is more likely than not that a net deferred tax asset will be realized.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

We only recognize a tax benefit after concluding that it is more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained upon audit by the respective taxing authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. Once the recognition threshold is met, we recognize a tax benefit measured as the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in our judgment, is greater
61

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
than 50% likely to be realized. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in Income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Due to the statute of limitations, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax audits by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for years prior to 2011.2017. Due to the statute of limitations, we also are no longer subject to U.S. state income tax audits prior to 2011.2017.
With respect to jurisdictions outside the U.S., several audits are in process. We have audits ongoing for the years 2011 through 20182020 related to Germany, Italy, India, Belgium, South Africa and Chile, some of which are for entities that have since been divested.
While we believe we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
Since the timing of resolutions and/or closure of tax audits are uncertain, it is difficult to predict with certainty the range of reasonably possible significant increases or decreases in the liability related to uncertain tax positions that may occur within the next twelve months. Our current view is that it is reasonably possible that we could record a decrease in the liability related to uncertain tax positions, relating to a number of issues, up to approximately $9.6$0.3 million as a result of closure of tax statutes. As a result of the sale of the Chemetall Surface Treatment business in 2016, we agreed to indemnify certain income and non-income tax liabilities, including uncertain tax positions, associated with the entities sold. The associated liability is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities. See Note 16, “Other Noncurrent Liabilities,” and Note 21, “Income Taxes,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further details.
We have designated the undistributed earnings of a portion of our foreign operations as indefinitely reinvested and as a result we do not provide for deferred income taxes on the unremitted earnings of these subsidiaries. Our foreign earnings are computed under U.S. federal tax earnings and profits (“E&P”) principles. In general, to the extent our financial reporting book basis over tax basis of a foreign subsidiary exceeds these E&P amounts, deferred taxes have not been provided, as they are essentially permanent in duration. The determination of the amount of such unrecognized deferred tax liability is not practicable. We provide for deferred income taxes on our undistributed earnings of foreign operations that are not deemed to be indefinitely invested. We will continue to evaluate our permanent investment assertion taking into consideration all relevant and current tax laws.
On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law in the U.S. The TCJA contains several key tax provisions including, among other things, the reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, the requirement of companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, and the creation of new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings such as global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”).  A company can elect an accounting policy to account for GILTI as a period charge in the future period the tax arises or as part of deferred taxes related to the investment or subsidiary.  The Company has elected to account for GILTI as a period cost.

Financial Condition and Liquidity
Overview
The principal uses of cash in our business generally have been capital investments and resource development costs, funding working capital, and service of debt. We also make contributions to our defined benefit pension plans, pay dividends to our shareholders and repurchase shares of our common stock. Historically, cash to fund the needs of our business has been principally provided by cash from operations, debt financing and equity issuances.
We are continually focused on working capital efficiency particularly in the areas of accounts receivable, payables and inventory. We anticipate that cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from divestitures and borrowings will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses, satisfy debt service obligations, fund capital expenditures and other investing activities, fund pension contributions and pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flow
Our cash and cash equivalents were $613.1$439.3 million at December 31, 20192021 as compared to $555.3$746.7 million at December 31, 2018.2020. Cash provided by operating activities was $719.4$344.3 million, $546.2$798.9 million and $304.0$719.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2021 versus 2020 was primarily due to the $332.5 million payment to Huntsman to settle a legacy Rockwood legal matter, lower earnings from the FCS business sold on June 1, 2021, as well as increased inventory balances and accounts receivable due to the timing of payments. This was partially offset by increased sales in our Lithium and Bromine segments. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 20192020 versus 20182019 was primarily due to lower working capital outflow, including a reduction in inventory build-up in Lithiumreductions and Catalysts. In addition, we receivedthe timing of receivable collections, as well as the previously announced Company-wide cost savings initiative and increased dividends from unconsolidated investments, and recorded higher cash earnings, particularly in Bromine Specialties. This was partiallywhich more than offset by timing on payables and higher cash taxes paid. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2018 versus 2017 was primarily due to higher income tax payments in 2017, including approximately $257 million of income taxes from the gain on sale of the Chemetall Surface Treatment business. In addition, 2018 benefited from increased earningslower revenues in each of our reportable segments, increased dividends receivedsegments. The working capital
62

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
outflow in 2020 also included the payment of $61.5 million related to stamp duties in Australia levied on the assets purchased as part of the acquisition of the Wodgina Project completed in 2019.
During 2021, cash on hand, cash provided by operations, net cash proceeds of $289.8 million from unconsolidated investments and lower interest payments. This was partially offset by increased receivables from higher net sales during 2018the sale of the FCS business, $388.5 million of commercial paper borrowings and the build-up$1.5 billion net proceeds from our underwritten public offering of inventorycommon stock funded debt principal payments of approximately $1.5 billion, early extinguishment of debt fees of (24,877), $332.5 million of the legal settlement related to the legacy Rockwood business arbitration, $953.7 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $177.9 million, and pension and postretirement contributions of $30.3 million. During 2020, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and proceeds from borrowings of $200 million from one of our credit facilities funded $850.0 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $161.8 million, and pension and postretirement contributions of $16.4 million. In addition, during 2020 we received $11.0 million in proceeds from the sale of our Lithiumownership interest in the SOCC joint venture during and Catalysts segments due to higher forecasted sales.
paid $22.6 million of agreed upon purchase price adjustments for the Wodgina Project acquisition. During 2019, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and proceeds from borrowings of $1.60 billion funded the Wodgina Project acquisition discussed below, $851.8 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $152.2 million, the repayment of $175.2 million of senior notes, and pension and postretirement contributions of $16.5 million. During 2018, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and $413.6 million of net proceeds from divestitures funded $114.7 million of commercial paper repayments, net of borrowings, $500.0 million of accelerated share repurchase programs, $700.0 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, and mining resource development, dividends to shareholders of $144.6 million, and pension and postretirement contributions of $15.2 million. During 2017, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and net borrowings of $138.8 million funded $778.2 million of debt repayments, $317.7 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, a $250.0 million accelerated share repurchase program, dividends to shareholders of $140.6 million, and pension and postretirement contributions of $13.3 million. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, our consolidated joint venture, JBC, paid dividends of approximately $224.9$247.8 million, $40.0$63.7 million and $102.5$224.9 million, respectively, which resulted in dividends to noncontrolling interests of $96.1 million, $32.1 million and $83.2 million, $14.8respectively.
On June 1, 2021, we completed the sale of the FCS business to Grace for proceeds of approximately $570 million, consisting of $300 million in cash and $36.8the issuance to Albemarle of preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary having an aggregate stated value of $270 million. The preferred equity can be redeemed at Grace’s option under certain conditions and will accrue payment-in-kind dividends at an annual rate of 12% beginning on June 1, 2023, two years after issuance.
On February 8, 2021, we completed an underwritten public offering of 8,496,773 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $153.00 per share. We also granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 1,274,509 shares, which was exercised. The total gross proceeds from this offering were approximately $1.5 billion, before deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and commissions. In the first quarter of 2021, we made the following debt principal payments using the net proceeds from this underwritten public offering:
€123.8 million respectively.of the 1.125% notes due in November 2025
€393.0 million, the remaining balance, of the 1.875% Senior notes originally due in December 2021
$128.4 million of the 3.45% Senior notes due in November 2029
$200.0 million, the remaining balance, of the floating rate notes originally due in November 2022
€183.3 million, the outstanding balance, of the unsecured credit facility originally entered into on August 14, 2019, as amended and restated on December 15, 2020 (the “2019 Credit Facility”)
$325.0 million, the outstanding balance, of the commercial paper notes
On October 31, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in the Wodgina Project for a total purchase price of$1.3of $1.3 billion. The purchase price is comprised of $820 million in cash subject to certain adjustments capped at $22.5 million, and the transfer of 40% interest in certain lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built by Albemarle in Kemerton, Western Australia, valued at approximately $480 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we paid $22.6 million of agreed upon purchase price adjustments. The cash consideration was funded by the unsecured credit facility entered into on August 14, 2019.
In November 2019, we issued notes totaling $500.0 million and €1.0 billion. The net proceeds from the issuance of these notes were used to repay the $1.0 billion balance of the the unsecured credit facility entered into on August 14, 2019, a large portion of approximately $370 million of commercial paper notes, the remaining balance of $175.2 million of the senior notes issued on December 10, 2010 (“2010 Senior Notes”), and for general corporate purposes. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million in Interest and financing expenses, representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of the 2010 Senior Notes.
On April 3, 2018, we completed the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture to W.R. Grace & Co. for net cash proceeds of approximately $413.6 million and recorded a gain of $210.4 million before income taxes in 2018 related to the sale of this business. The transaction included Albemarle’s Product Development Center located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and operations at our Yeosu, South Korea site. The sale did not include the organometallics or curatives portion of the PCS business. The Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture reflects our commitment to investing in the future growth of our high priority businesses and returning capital to our shareholders.
In the first quarter of 2017, using a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Chemetall Surface Treatment business, we repaid the 3.00% Senior notes in full, €307.0 million of the 1.875% Senior notes and $174.7 million of the 4.50% Senior notes, as well as related tender premiums of $45.2 million. As a result, Interest and financing expenses on the consolidated statements of income includes a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $52.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of these senior notes.
Capital expenditures were $851.8$953.7 million, $700.0$850.5 million and $317.7$851.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively, and were incurred mainly for plant, machinery and equipment, and mining resource development. The increase in capital expenditures during the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily driven by expansion in our Lithium business.
63

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We expect our capital expenditures to be between $1.0$1.3 billion and $1.1$1.5 billion in 20202022 primarily for Lithium growth and capacity increases, primarily in Australia, China and Silver Peak, Nevada, as well as productivity and continuity of operations projects in all segments. OfTrain I of our Kemerton, Western Australia plant was completed in December 2021, but due to the total capital expenditures, our projectsongoing labor shortages and COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions in Western Australia, Train II construction is now expected to be completed in the second half of 2022. Commercial sales volume from Train I will begin in 2022 and Train II in 2023.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we incurred $12.7 million, $17.3 million and $20.7 million of costs related to the continuity of operations is expected to remain in the range of 5-7% of net sales, similar to prior years.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

During 2019, we incurred $20.7 million of acquisition, integration and integration related costs related topotential divestitures for various significant projects, including the acquisition of the Wodgina Project in 2019, which primarily consistingconsisted of professional services and advisory fees. During 2018, we incurred $19.4 million of acquisition and integration related costs related to various significant projects. During 2017, we incurred $33.9 million of acquisition and integration related costs related to various significant projects, including the Jiangli New Materials acquisition, which contains non-routine compensation related costs negotiated specifically as a result of this acquisition that are outside of the Company’s ordinary course compensation arrangements.
The Company is permitted to repurchase up to a maximum of 15,000,000 shares under a share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors. Under this share repurchase program, the Company repurchased approximately 5.3 million shares and 2.3 million shares of our common stock during 2018 and 2017, respectively, which reduced the Company’s weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share. All of the shares repurchased in 2018 and 2017 were repurchased pursuant to the terms of accelerated share repurchase agreements with major financial institutions. There were no shares of our common stock repurchased during 2021, 2020 or 2019. At December 31, 2019,2021, there were 7,396,263 remaining shares available for repurchase under the Company’s authorized share repurchase program.
Net current assets decreased to approximately $816.1$133.6 million at December 31, 20192021 from $815.2$404.3 million at December 31, 2018, with the2020. The decrease being largelyis primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents to pay a portion of the 40% interestlegacy Rockwood legal matter and for capital expenditures, as well as the increase in our Kemerton assets being constructed to be transferred to MRL inaccrued expenses for the next twelve months, which is recorded in Accrued expenses.remaining payment of the legacy Rockwood legal matter. This iswas partially offset by the increase in Cash and cash equivalents and repayment of commercial paper notes resultingthe current portion of long-term debt using proceeds from the issuanceour underwritten public offering of approximately $1.6 billion of new notes in November 2019.our common stock. Additional changes in the components of net current assets are primarily due to the timing of the sale of goods and other ordinary transactions leading up to the balance sheet dates and are not the result of any policy changes by the Company, and do not reflect any change in either the quality of our net current assets or our expectation of success in converting net working capital to cash in the ordinary course of business.
At December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, our cash and cash equivalents included $565.6$374.0 million and $525.8$492.8 million, respectively, held by our foreign subsidiaries. The majority of these foreign cash balances are associated with earnings that we have asserted are indefinitely reinvested and which we plan to use to support our continued growth plans outside the U.S. through funding of capital expenditures, acquisitions, research, operating expenses or other similar cash needs of our foreign operations. From time to time, we repatriate cash associated with earnings from our foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. for normal operating needs through intercompany dividends, but only from subsidiaries whose earnings we have not asserted to be indefinitely reinvested or whose earnings qualify as “previously taxed income” as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, we repatriated approximately $351.9$0.9 million, $621.8$1.8 million and $20.5$351.9 million of cash, respectively, as part of these foreign earnings cash repatriation activities.
While we continue to closely monitor our cash generation, working capital management and capital spending in light of continuing uncertainties in the global economy, we believe that we will continue to have the financial flexibility and capability to opportunistically fund future growth initiatives. Additionally, we anticipate that future capital spending, including business acquisitions, share repurchases and other cash outlays, should be financed primarily with cash flow provided by operations and cash on hand, with additional cash needed, if any, provided by borrowings. The amount and timing of any additional borrowings will depend on our specific cash requirements.
Long-Term Debt
We currently have the following notes outstanding:
Issue Month/YearPrincipal (in millions)Interest RateInterest Payment DatesMaturity Date
November 2019€371.71.125%November 25November 25, 2025
November 2019€500.01.625%November 25November 25, 2028
November 2019(a)
$171.63.45% May 15 and November 15November 15, 2029
November 2014(a)
$425.04.15%June 1 and December 1December 1, 2024
November 2014(a)
$350.05.45%June 1 and December 1December 1, 2044

Issue Month/Year Principal (in millions) Interest Rate Interest Payment Dates Maturity Date
November 2019 €500.0 1.125% November 25 November 25, 2025
November 2019 €500.0 1.625% November 25 November 25, 2028
November 2019(a)
 $300.0 3.45%  May 15 and November 15 November 15, 2029
November 2019(b)
 $200.0 Floating Rate February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 November 15, 2022
December 2014(a)
 €393.0 1.875% December 8 December 8, 2021
November 2014(a)
 $425.0 4.15% June 1 and December 1 December 1, 2024
November 2014(a)
 $350.0 5.45% June 1 and December 1 December 1, 2044
(a)    Denotes senior notes.

(a)Denotes senior notes.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

(b)Borrowings bear interest at a floating rate based on the 3-month LIBOR plus 105 basis points. The floating interest rate for the initial interest period is 2.9595%, with the interest rate reset on each interest payment date.
Our senior notes and the floating rate note are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all our other senior unsecured indebtedness from time to time outstanding. TheseThe notes are effectively subordinated to anyall of our existing or future secured indebtedness and to the existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries. As is customary for such long-term debt instruments, each series of these notes
64

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
outstanding has terms that allow us to redeem the notes before its maturity, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of these notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of redemption) discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis using the comparable government rate (as defined in the indentures governing these notes) plus between 25 and 40 basis points, depending on the note,series of notes, plus, in each case, accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption. Holders may require us to purchase such notes at 101% upon a change of control triggering event, as defined in the indentures. These notes are subject to typical events of default, including bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment and the acceleration of certain subsidiary indebtedness of $40 million or more caused by a nonpayment default.
Our Euro notes issued in 2019 are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment to all our other unsecured senior obligations. The Euro notes are effectively subordinated to all of our existing or future secured indebtedness and to the existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries. As is customary for such long-term debt instruments, each series of these notes outstanding has terms that allow us to redeem the notes before itstheir maturity, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal thereof and interest thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to, but excluding, the date of redemption) discounted to the redemption date on an annual basis using the bond rate (as defined in the indentures governing these notes) plus between 25 and 35 basis points, depending on the note,series of notes, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption. Holders may require us to purchase such notes at 101% upon a change of control triggering event, as defined in the indentures. These notes are subject to typical events of default, including bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment and the acceleration of certain subsidiary indebtedness exceeding $100 million caused by a nonpayment default.
Our revolving, unsecured credit agreement dated as of June 21, 2018, as amended on August 14, 2019 and further amended on May 11, 2020 (the “2018 Credit Agreement”), currently provides for borrowings of up to $1.0 billion and matures on August 9, 2024. Borrowings under the 2018 Credit Agreement bear interest at variable rates based on an average LIBOR for deposits in the relevant currency plus an applicable margin which ranges from 0.910% to 1.500%, depending on the Company’s credit rating from Standard & Poor’s RatingRatings Services LLC (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”). The applicable margin on the facility was 1.125% as of December 31, 2019.2021. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2018 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2019.2021.
On August 14, 2019, the Company entered into athe $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility (the “20192019 Credit Facility”)Facility with several banks and other financial institutions.institutions, which was amended and restated on December 15, 2020 and again on December 10, 2021. The lenders’ commitment to provide new loans under the amended 2019 Credit Facility permits up to four borrowings by the Company in an aggregate amount equal to $750 million. The 2019 Credit Facility terminates on August 11, 2020,December 9, 2022, with each such loan maturing one year364 days after the funding of such loan. The Company can request that the maturity date of loans be extended for an additionala period of up to four additional years, but any such extension is subject to the approval of the lenders. BorrowingsAt the option of the Company, the borrowings under the 2019 Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates based on an averageeither the base rate or LIBOR for deposits in the relevant currencyU.S. dollars, in each case plus an applicable margin which ranges from 0.000% to 0.375% for base rate borrowings or 0.875% to 1.625%,1.375% for LIBOR borrowings, depending on the Company’s credit rating from S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. The applicable margin on the credit facility2019 Credit Facility was 1.125% as of December 31, 2019. In October 2019, we borrowed $1.0 billion under this credit facility to fund the cash portion of the October 31, 2019 acquisition of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project and for general corporate purposes, and such amount was repaid in full in November 2019 using a portion of the proceeds received from the notes issued in 2019 (see above for further details). Following the repayment of the amounts borrowed, the Company had $200 million remaining to borrow under this credit facility.2021. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2019 Credit FacilityAgreement as of December 31, 2019.2021.
Borrowings under the under the 2019 Credit Facility and 2018 Credit Agreement (together “the Creditthe “Credit Agreements”) are conditioned upon satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the absence of defaults. The Company is subject to one financial covenant, as well as customary affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenant requires that the Company’s consolidated net funded debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio (as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreements) to be less than or equal to 4.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021 and 3.50:1.00,1 for fiscal quarters thereafter, subject to adjustments in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreements relating to a consummation of an acquisition where the consideration includes cash proceeds from issuance of funded debt in excess of $500 million. The Credit Agreements also contain customary default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants and cross-defaults to other material indebtedness. The occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreements could result in all loans and other obligations becoming immediately due and payable and the credit facilityeach such Credit Agreement being terminated. Certain representations, warranties and covenants under
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

the 2018 Credit Agreement were conformed to those under the 2019 Credit Facility following an amendment entered into on August 14, 2019.the amendments to those agreements.
On May 29, 2013, we entered into agreements to initiate a commercial paper program on a private placement basis under which we may issue unsecured commercial paper notes (the “Commercial Paper Notes”) from time-to-time up to a maximum
65

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time of $750.0 million. The proceeds from the issuance of the Commercial Paper Notes are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of other debt of the Company. The Credit Agreements are available to repay the Commercial Paper Notes, if necessary. Aggregate borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreements and the Commercial Paper Notes will not exceed the $1.2$1.75 billion current maximum amount available under the Credit Agreements. The Commercial Paper Notes will be sold at a discount from par, or alternatively, will be sold at par and bear interest at rates that will vary based upon market conditions at the time of issuance. The maturities of the Commercial Paper Notes will vary but may not exceed 397 days from the date of issue. The definitive documents relating to the commercial paper program contain customary representations, warranties, default and indemnification provisions. At December 31, 2019,2021, we had $186.7$388.5 million of Commercial Paper Notes outstanding bearing a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 2.01%0.46% and a weighted-average maturity of 3920 days. The Commercial Paper Notes are classified as Current portion of long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020.
The non-current portion of our long-term debt amounted to $2.86$2.00 billion at December 31, 2019,2021, compared to $1.40$2.77 billion at December 31, 2018.2020. In addition, at December 31, 2019,2021, we had the ability to borrow $1.01$1.36 billion under our commercial paper program and the Credit Agreements, and $283.4$210.6 million under other existing lines of credit, subject to various financial covenants under our Credit Agreements. We have the ability and intent to refinance our borrowings under our other existing credit lines with borrowings under the Credit Agreements, as applicable. Therefore, the amounts outstanding under those credit lines, if any, are classified as long-term debt. We believe that as of December 31, 20192021 we were, and currently are, in compliance with all of our debt covenants. For additional information about our long-term debt obligations, see Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and others, we have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, including bank guarantees and letters of credit, which totaled approximately $82.3$81.2 million at December 31, 2019.2021. None of these off-balance sheet arrangements has, or is likely to have, a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
Other Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations for capital projects, various take or pay and throughput agreements, long-term debt, operating leases and other commitments as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter
Long-term debt obligations(a)
$187,336
 $436,072
 $200,000
 $
 $425,000
 $1,825,984
Expected interest payments on long-term debt obligations(b)
76,515
 76,515
 68,134
 62,215
 60,745
 473,065
Operating lease obligations (rental)28,333
 15,306
 13,153
 12,433
 11,850
 94,002
Take or pay / throughput agreements(c)
62,568
 20,860
 7,690
 5,628
 4,830
 10,907
Letters of credit and guarantees49,152
 11,383
 1,303
 1,190
 
 19,305
Transition tax on foreign earnings(d)
10,540
 30,442
 30,442
 44,578
 67,177
 130,850
Capital projects500,975
 96,343
 3,473
 
 
 
Total$915,419
 $686,921
 $324,195
 $126,044
 $569,602
 $2,554,113
(a)Amounts represent the expected principal payments of our long-term debt and do not include any fair value adjustments, premiums or discounts. Obligations in 2020 include our outstanding Commercial Paper Notes of $186.7 million with a weighted average maturity of 39 days.
(b)Interest on our fixed rate borrowings was calculated based on the stated rates of such borrowings. A weighted average interest rate of approximately 2.87% was used for our remaining long-term debt obligations.
(c)These amounts primarily relate to contracts entered into with certain third party vendors in the normal course of business to secure raw materials for our production processes. In order to secure materials, sometimes for long durations, these contracts mandate a minimum amount of product to be purchased at predetermined rates over a set timeframe.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

(d)In December 2017, the TCJA was signed into law imposing a one-time transition tax on foreign earnings, payable over an eight-year period. The one-time transition tax imposed by the TCJA is based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits that we previously deferred from U.S. income taxes.
Amounts in the table above exclude required employer pension contributions. Contributions to our domestic and foreign qualified and nonqualified pension plans, including our supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”), are expected to approximate $13 million in 2020. We may choose to make additional pension contributions in excess of this amount. We made contributions of approximately $13.4 million to our domestic and foreign pension plans (both qualified and nonqualified) during the year ended December 31, 2019.
The liability related to uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities totaled $21.2 million and $22.9 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Related assets for corresponding offsetting benefits recorded in Other assets totaled $26.1 million and $13.0 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We cannot estimate the amounts of any cash payments during the next twelve months associated with these liabilities and are unable to estimate the timing of any such cash payments in the future at this time.
Liquidity Outlook
We anticipate that cash on hand and cash provided by operating activities, divestitures and borrowings will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses, satisfy debt service obligations, fund any capital expenditures and share repurchases, make acquisitions, make pension contributions and pay dividends for the foreseeable future. Our main focus overduring the continued uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic is to continue to maintain financial flexibility by continuing our cost savings initiative, while still protecting our employees and customers, committing to shareholder returns and maintaining an investment grade rating. Over the next three years, in terms of uses of cash, we will be investingcontinue to invest in growth of the businesses and the return of value to shareholders. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate the merits of any opportunities that may arise for acquisitions of businesses or assets, which may require additional liquidity.
Our growth investments include the recently announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity of Tianyuan for approximately $200 million in cash. Tianyuan's operations include a recently constructed lithium processing plant that has designed annual conversion capacity of up to 25,000 metric tons of LCE and is capable of producing battery-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide. We expect the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, to close in the first half of 2022. In 2019,addition, we announced thatagreements for strategic investments in China with plans to build two lithium hydroxide conversion plants, each initially targeting 50,000 metric tons per year. We expect construction of these conversion plants to begin in 2022 and be completed by the end of 2024.
Overall, with generally strong cash-generative businesses and no significant long-term debt maturities before November 2024, we believe we have, begunand will be able to pursue opportunitiesmaintain, a solid liquidity position. Our annual maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in millions): 2022—$389.9; 2023—$0.0; 2024—$425.0; 2025—$426.6; 2026—$0.0; thereafter—$1,166.4. Obligations in 2022 primarily include our outstanding Commercial Paper Notes of $388.5 million with a weighted average maturity of 20 days. In addition, we expect to divestmake interest payments on those long-term debt obligations as follows (in millions): 2022—$58.5; 2023—$56.6; 2024—$55.1; 2025—$38.5; 2026—$34.1; thereafter—$378.1. For variable-rate debt obligations, projected interest payments are calculated using the December 31, 2021 weighted average interest rate of approximately 0.40%.
In addition, we expect our PCScapital expenditures to be between $1.3 billion and fine chemistry services businesses, with$1.5 billion in 2022, primarily for Lithium growth and capacity increases, primarily in Australia, China and Silver Peak, Nevada, as well as productivity and continuity of operations projects in all segments. Train I of our Kemerton, Western Australia plant was completed in December 2021, but due to the expectation that each divestiture willongoing labor shortages and COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions in Western Australia, Train II construction is now
66

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
expected to be completed in 2020.the second half of 2022. Commercial sales volume from Train I will begin in 2022 and Train II in 2023. As of December 31, 2021, we have also committed to approximately $99.4 million of payments to third-party vendors in the normal course of business to secure raw materials for our production processes, with approximately $78.3 million to be paid in 2022. In order to secure materials, sometimes for long durations, these contracts mandate a minimum amount of product to be purchased at predetermined rates over a set timeframe.
See Note 18, “Leases,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for our annual expected payments under our operating lease obligations at December 31, 2021.
In 2022, we expect to pay $23.8 million of the $258.0 million balance remaining from the transition tax on foreign earnings as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) signed into law in December 2017. The one-time transition tax imposed by the TCJA is based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits that we previously deferred from U.S. income taxes and is payable over an eight-year period, with the final payment made in 2026.
Contributions to our domestic and foreign qualified and nonqualified pension plans, including our supplemental executive retirement plan, are expected to approximate $12 million in 2022. We may choose to make additional pension contributions in excess of this amount. We made contributions of approximately $27.6 million to our domestic and foreign pension plans (both qualified and nonqualified) during the year ended December 31, 2021.
The liability related to uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities totaled $27.7 million and $14.7 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Related assets for corresponding offsetting benefits recorded in Other assets totaled $32.9 million and $24.1 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We cannot estimate the amounts of any cash payments during the next twelve months associated with these liabilities and are unable to estimate the timing of any such cash payments in the future at this time.
Our cash flows from operations may be negatively affected by adverse consequences to our customers and the markets in which we compete as a result of moderating global economic conditions and reduced capital availability. The COVID-19 pandemic has not had a material impact on our liquidity to date; however, we cannot predict the overall impact in terms of cash flow generation as that will depend on the length and severity of the outbreak. As a result, we are planning for various economic scenarios and actively monitoring our balance sheet to maintain the financial flexibility needed.
WhileAlthough we maintain business relationships with a diverse group of financial institutions as sources of financing, an adverse change in their credit standing could lead them to not honor their contractual credit commitments to us, decline funding under our existing but uncommitted lines of credit with them, not renew their extensions of credit or not provide new financing.financing to us. While the global corporate bond and bank loan markets remain strong, periods of elevated uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic or global economic and/or geopolitical concerns may limit efficient access to such markets for extended periods of time. If such concerns heighten, we may incur increased borrowing costs and reduced credit capacity as our various credit facilities mature. WhenIf the U.S. Federal Reserve or similar national reserve banks in other countries decide to tighten the monetary supply in response, for example, to improving economic conditions, we may incur increased borrowing costs as(as interest rates increase on our variable rate credit facilities, as our various credit facilities mature or as we refinance any maturing fixed rate debt obligations,obligations), although these cost increases would be partially offset by increased income rates on portions of our cash deposits.
Overall,On February 6, 2017, Huntsman, a subsidiary of Huntsman Corporation, filed a lawsuit in New York state court against Rockwood, Rockwood Specialties, Inc., certain former executives of Rockwood and its subsidiaries—Seifollah Ghasemi, Thomas Riordan, Andrew Ross, and Michael Valente, and Albemarle. The lawsuit arises out of Huntsman’s acquisition of certain Rockwood subsidiaries in connection with generally strong cash-generative businessesa stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”), dated September 17, 2013. Before that transaction closed on October 1, 2014, Albemarle began discussions with Rockwood to purchase all outstanding equity of Rockwood and no significant long-term debt maturities beforedid so in a transaction that closed on January 12, 2015. Huntsman’s complaint asserted that certain technology that Rockwood had developed for a production facility in Augusta, Georgia, and which was among the assets that Huntsman acquired pursuant to the SPA, did not work, and that Rockwood and the defendant executives had intentionally misled Huntsman about that technology in connection with the Huntsman-Rockwood transaction. The complaint asserted claims for, among other things, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the SPA, and sought certain costs for completing construction of the production facility.
On March 10, 2017, Albemarle moved in New York state court to compel arbitration, which was granted on January 8, 2018 (although Huntsman unsuccessfully appealed that decision). Huntsman’s arbitration demand asserted claims substantially similar to those asserted in its state court complaint, and sought various forms of legal remedies, including cost overruns, compensatory damages, expectation damages, punitive damages, and restitution. After a trial, the arbitration panel issued an
67

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
award on October 28, 2021, we believe we have,awarding approximately $600 million (including interest) to be paid by Albemarle to Huntsman, in addition to the possibility of attorney’s fees, costs and will maintain,expenses. Following the arbitration panel decision, Albemarle reached a solid liquidity position.settlement with Huntsman to pay $665 million in two equal installments, with the first payment made in December 2021. As a result, the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2021, includes expense of $657.4 million ($508.5 million net of income tax), inclusive of legal fees incurred by Huntsman and other related obligations, to reflect the agreed upon resolution of this legal matter.
As previouslyIn addition, as first reported in 2018, following receipt of information regarding potential improper payments being made by third partythird-party sales representatives of our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, we promptly retained outside counsel and forensic accountants to investigate potential violations of the Company’s Code of Conduct, the FCPA,Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other potentially applicable laws. Based on this internal investigation, we have voluntarily self-reported potential issues relating to the use of third partythird-party sales representatives in our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, to the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP, and are cooperating with the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP in their review of these matters. In connection with our internal investigation, we have implemented, and are continuing to implement, appropriate remedial measures. We have commenced discussions with the SEC about a potential resolution.
At this time, we are unable to predict the duration, scope, result, or related costs associated with the investigations by the DOJ, the SEC, or DPP.investigations. We also are unable to predict what if any, action may be taken by the DOJ, the SEC, or the DPP, or what penalties or remedial actions they may seek to impose.ultimately seek. Any determination that our operations or activities are not, or were not, in compliance with existing laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses. We do not believe, however, that any such fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or liquidity. However, an adverse resolution could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a particular period.
We had cash and cash equivalents totaling $613.1$439.3 million as of December 31, 2019,2021, of which $565.6$374.0 million is held by our foreign subsidiaries. This cash represents an important source of our liquidity and is invested in bank accounts or money
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

market investments with no limitations on access. The cash held by our foreign subsidiaries is intended for use outside of the U.S. We anticipate that any needs for liquidity within the U.S. in excess of our cash held in the U.S. can be readily satisfied with borrowings under our existing U.S. credit facilities or our commercial paper program.
Guarantor Financial Information
Albemarle Wodgina Pty Ltd Issued Notes
Albemarle Wodgina Pty Ltd (the “Issuer”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Albemarle Corporation, issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2029 (the “3.45% Senior Notes”) in November 2019. The 3.45% Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (the “Guarantee”) on a senior unsecured basis by Albemarle Corporation (the “Parent Guarantor”). No direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Parent Guarantor guarantee the 3.45% Senior Notes (such subsidiaries are referred to as the “Non-Guarantors”).
In 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project in Western Australia and formed an unincorporated joint venture with MRL, MARBL, for the exploration, development, mining, processing and production of lithium and other minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) from the Wodgina spodumene mine and for the operation of the Kemerton assets in Western Australia. We participate in the Wodgina Project through our ownership interest in the Issuer.
The Parent Guarantor conducts its U.S. Bromine and Catalysts operations directly, and conducts its other operations (other than operations conducted through the Issuer) through the Non-Guarantors.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are the Issuer’s senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment to the senior indebtedness of the Issuer, effectively subordinated to all of the secured indebtedness of the Issuer, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness, and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of its subsidiaries. The Guarantee is the senior unsecured obligation of the Parent Guarantor and ranks equally in right of payment to the senior indebtedness of the Parent Guarantor, effectively subordinated to the secured debt of the Parent Guarantor to the extent of the value of the assets securing the indebtedness and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of its subsidiaries.
For cash management purposes, the Parent Guarantor transfers cash among itself, the Issuer and the Non-Guarantors through intercompany financing arrangements, contributions or declaration of dividends between the respective parent and its subsidiaries. The transfer of cash under these activities facilitates the ability of the recipient to make specified third-party payments for principal and interest on the Issuer and/or the Parent Guarantor’s outstanding debt, common stock dividends and
68

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
common stock repurchases. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Issuer or the Parent Guarantor to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Parent Guarantor and the Issuer on a combined basis after elimination of (i) intercompany transactions and balances among the Issuer and the Parent Guarantor and (ii) equity in earnings from and investments in any subsidiary that is a Non-Guarantor. Each entity in the combined financial information follows the same accounting policies as described herein.
Summarized Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Net sales(a)
$1,412,913 
Gross profit241,739 
Loss before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments(b)(c)
(607,995)
Net loss attributable to the Guarantor and the Issuer(c)
(558,342)
(a)    Includes net sales to Non-Guarantors of $715.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes intergroup expenses to Non-Guarantors of $114.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes Parent Guarantor’s portion of the gain on sale of the FCS business on June 1, 2021 and the loss for the legacy Rockwood legal matter. In addition, includes Issuer’s loss related to anticipated cost overruns for MRL’s 40% interest in lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton.
Summarized Balance Sheet
At December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Current assets(a)
$961,003 
Net property, plant and equipment2,979,034 
Other non-current assets534,695 
Current liabilities(b)
$2,329,212 
Long-term debt1,002,009 
Other non-current liabilities(c)
7,008,857 
(a)    Includes receivables from Non-Guarantors of $466.6 million at December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes current payables to Non-Guarantors of $1,105.2 million at December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes non-current payables to Non-Guarantors of $6.5 billion at December 31, 2021.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Non-Guarantors. The Non-Guarantors are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to the 3.45% Senior Notes or the Indenture under which the 3.45% Senior Notes were issued, or to make any funds available therefor, whether by dividends, loans, distributions or other payments. Any right that the Parent Guarantor has to receive any assets of any of the Non-Guarantors upon the liquidation or reorganization of any Non-Guarantor, and the consequent rights of holders of the 3.45% Senior Notes to realize proceeds from the sale of any of a Non-Guarantor’s assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of such Non-Guarantor’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of preferred equity interests, if any, of such Non-Guarantor. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of the Non-Guarantors, the Non-Guarantors will pay the holders of their debts, holders of preferred equity interests, if any, and their trade creditors before they will be able to distribute any of their assets to the Parent Guarantor.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are obligations of the Issuer. The Issuer’s cash flow and ability to make payments on the 3.45% Senior Notes could be dependent upon the earnings it derives from the production from MARBL for the Wodgina Project. Absent income received from sales of its share of production from MARBL, the Issuer’s ability to service the 3.45% Senior Notes could be dependent upon the earnings of the Parent Guarantor’s subsidiaries and other joint ventures and the payment of those earnings to the Issuer in the form of equity, loans or advances and through repayment of loans or advances from the Issuer.

69

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
The Issuer’s obligations in respect of MARBL are guaranteed by the Parent Guarantor. Further, under MARBL pursuant to a deed of cross security between the Issuer, the joint venture partner and the manager of the project (the “Manager”), each of the Issuer, and the joint venture partner have granted security to each other and the Manager for the obligations each of the Issuer and the joint venture partner have to each other and to the Manager. The claims of the joint venture partner, the Manager and other secured creditors of the Issuer will have priority as to the assets of the Issuer over the claims of holders of the 3.45% Senior Notes.
Albemarle Corporation Issued Notes
In March 2021, Albemarle New Holding GmbH (the “Subsidiary Guarantor”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Albemarle Corporation, added a full and unconditional guarantee (the “Upstream Guarantee”) to all securities issued and outstanding by Albemarle Corporation (the “Parent Issuer”) and issuable by the Parent Issuer pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of January 20, 2005, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the “Indenture”). No other direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Parent Issuer guarantee these securities (such subsidiaries are referred to as the “Upstream Non-Guarantors”). See Long-term debt section above for a description of the securities issued by the Parent Issuer.
The current securities outstanding under the Indenture are the Parent Issuer’s unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. With respect to any series of securities issued under the Indenture, the Upstream Guarantee is, and will be, an unsecured and unsubordinated obligation of the Subsidiary Guarantor, ranking pari passu with all other existing and future unsubordinated and unsecured indebtedness of the Subsidiary Guarantor.
For cash management purposes, the Parent Issuer transfers cash among itself, the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Upstream Non-Guarantors through intercompany financing arrangements, contributions or declaration of dividends between the respective parent and its subsidiaries. The transfer of cash under these activities facilitates the ability of the recipient to make specified third-party payments for principal and interest on the Parent Issuer and/or the Subsidiary Guarantor’s outstanding debt, common stock dividends and common stock repurchases. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Parent Issuer or the Subsidiary Guarantor to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Parent Issuer on a combined basis after elimination of (i) intercompany transactions and balances among the Parent Issuer and the Subsidiary Guarantor and (ii) equity in earnings from and investments in any subsidiary that is an Upstream Non-Guarantor.
Summarized Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Net sales(a)
$1,412,913 
Gross profit259,314 
Loss before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments(b)(c)
(368,737)
Net loss attributable to the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Parent Issuer(c)
(320,726)
(a)    Includes net sales to Non-Guarantors of $715.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes intergroup expenses to Non-Guarantors of $17.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes the Parent Issuer’s portion of the gain on sale of the FCS business on June 1, 2021 and the loss for the legacy Rockwood legal matter.
70

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Summarized Balance Sheet
At December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Current assets(a)
$1,039,391 
Net property, plant and equipment754,818 
Other non-current assets(b)
1,634,883 
Current liabilities(c)
$2,174,360 
Long-term debt1,755,026 
Other non-current liabilities(d)
6,404,958 
(a)    Includes current receivables from Non-Guarantors of $576.1 million at December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes noncurrent receivables from Non-Guarantors of $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes current payables to Non-Guarantors of $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021.
(d)    Includes non-current payables to Non-Guarantors of $5.8 billion at December 31, 2021.
These securities are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Upstream Non-Guarantors. The Upstream Non-Guarantors are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to these securities or the Indenture under which these securities were issued, or to make any funds available therefor, whether by dividends, loans, distributions or other payments. Any right that the Subsidiary Guarantor has to receive any assets of any of the Upstream Non-Guarantors upon the liquidation or reorganization of any Upstream Non-Guarantors, and the consequent rights of holders of these securities to realize proceeds from the sale of any of an Upstream Non-Guarantor’s assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of such Upstream Non-Guarantor’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of preferred equity interests, if any, of such Upstream Non-Guarantor. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of the Upstream Non-Guarantors, the Upstream Non-Guarantors will pay the holders of their debts, holders of preferred equity interests, if any, and their trade creditors before they will be able to distribute any of their assets to the Subsidiary Guarantor.

Safety and Environmental Matters
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign requirements regulating the handling, manufacture and use of materials (some of which may be classified as hazardous or toxic by one or more regulatory agencies), the discharge of materials into the environment and the protection of the environment. To our knowledge, we are currently complying and expect to continue to comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws, regulations, statutes and ordinances. Compliance with existing federal, state, local and foreign environmental protection laws is not expected to have a material effect on capital expenditures, earnings or our competitive position, but the costs associated with increased legal or regulatory requirements could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
Among other environmental requirements, we are subject to the federal Superfund law, and similar state laws, under which we may be designated as a PRP, and may be liable for a share of the costs associated with cleaning up various hazardous waste sites. Management believes that in cases in which we may have liability as a PRP, our liability for our share of cleanup is de minimis. Further, almost all such sites represent environmental issues that are quite mature and have been investigated, studied and in many cases settled. In de minimis situations, our policy generally is to negotiate a consent decree and to pay any apportioned settlement, enabling us to be effectively relieved of any further liability as a PRP, except for remote contingencies. In other than de minimis PRP matters, our records indicate that unresolved PRP exposures should be immaterial. We accrue and expense our proportionate share of PRP costs. Because management has been actively involved in evaluating environmental matters, we are able to conclude that the outstanding environmental liabilities for unresolved PRP sites should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations or financial condition.
Our environmental and safety operating costs charged to expense were $43.2 million, $44.9 million and $48.0 million $42.9 millionin 2021, 2020 and $40.1 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, excluding depreciation of previous capital expenditures, and are expected to be in the same range in the next few years. Costs for remediation have been accrued and payments related to sites are charged against accrued liabilities, which at December 31, 20192021 totaled approximately $42.6$46.6 million, a decreasean increase of $7.0$0.8 million from $49.6$45.8 million at December 31, 2018.2020. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a reconciliation of our environmental liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017.2019.
71

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We believe that any sum we may be required to pay in connection with environmental remediation and asset retirement obligation matters in excess of the amounts recorded should occur over a period of time and should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows on a consolidated annual basis, although any such sum could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows in a particular quarterly reporting period.
Capital expenditures for pollution-abatement and safety projects, including such costs that are included in other projects, were approximately $55.4 million, $40.4 million and $44.4 million $47.3 millionin 2021, 2020 and $28.1 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In the future, capital expenditures for these types of projects may increase due to more stringent environmental regulatory requirements and our efforts in reaching sustainability goals. Management’s estimates of the effects of compliance with governmental pollution-abatement and safety regulations are subject to (a) the possibility of changes in the applicable statutes and regulations or in judicial or administrative construction of such statutes and regulations and (b) uncertainty as to whether anticipated solutions to pollution problems will be successful, or whether additional expenditures may prove necessary.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a discussion of our Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The primary currencies to which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure are the Euro, Japanese Yen, Chinese Renminbi, Australian Dollar and Chilean Peso. In response to greater fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in recent periods, we have increased the degree of exposure risk management activities to minimize the potential impact on earnings.
We manage our foreign currency exposures by balancing certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and through the use, from time to time, of foreign currency forward contracts. The principal objective of such contracts is to
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

minimize the financial impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The counterparties to these contractual agreements are major financial institutions with which we generally have other financial relationships. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties. We do not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
The primary method we use to reduce foreign currency exposure is to identify natural hedges, in which the operating activities denominated in respective currencies across various subsidiaries balance in respect to timing and the underlying exposures. In the event a natural hedge is not available, we may employ a forward contract to reduce exposure, generally expiring within one year. While these contracts are subject to fluctuations in value, such fluctuations are intended to offset the changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we entered into a foreign currency forward contract to hedge the cash flow exposure of non-functional currency purchases during the construction of the Kemerton plant in Australia. This contract has been designated as an effective hedging instrument, and beginning the date of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of this contract to our reporting currency have been and will be recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. All other gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts not designated as an effective hedging instrument are recognized in Other expenses, net, and generally do not have a significant impact on results of operations.
At December 31, 2019,2021, our financial instruments subject to foreign currency exchange risk consisted of foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate notional value of $1.63 billion$654.6 million and with a fair value representing a net asset position of $3.8$2.8 million. Fluctuations in the value of these contracts are intended to offset the changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the fair value of our foreign currency hedge portfolio assuming an instantaneous 10% change in select foreign currency exchange rates from their levels as of December 31, 2019,2021, with all other variables held constant. A 10% appreciation of the U.S. Dollar against foreign currencies that we hedge would result in a decrease of approximately $35.4$33.6 million in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. A 10% depreciation of the U.S. Dollar against these foreign currencies would result in an increase of approximately $43.8$38.0 million in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. The sensitivity of the fair value of our foreign currency hedge portfolio represents changes in fair values estimated based on market conditions as of December 31, 2019,2021, without reflecting the effects of underlying anticipated transactions. When those anticipated transactions are realized, actual effects of changing foreign currency exchange rates could have a material impact on our earnings and cash flows in future periods.
On December 18, 2014, the carrying value of our 1.875% Euro-denominated senior notes was designated as an effective hedge of our net investment in foreign subsidiaries where the Euro serves as the functional currency, and beginning on the date
72

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of these senior notes to our reporting currency have been and will bewere recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. In January 2017,the first quarter of 2021, we repaid €307.0 millionthe outstanding balance of these senior notes, using proceeds from the sale of the Chemetall Surface Treatment business. This repayment did not impair the designated hedge of ourand as a result, this net investment inhedge was discontinued. The balance of foreign subsidiaries whereexchange revaluation gains and losses associated with this discontinued net investment hedge will remain within accumulated other comprehensive loss until the Euro serves as the functional currency.hedged net investment is sold or liquidated.
We are exposed to changes in interest rates that could impact our results of operations and financial condition. We manage global interest rate and foreign exchange exposure as part of our regular operational and financing strategies. We had variable interest rate borrowings of $394.0$393.7 million and $313.8$756.6 million outstanding at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. These borrowings represented 13%16% and 18%21% of total outstanding debt and bore average interest rates of 2.46%0.40% and 2.85%0.87% at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. A hypothetical 10%100 basis point increase (approximately 25 basis points) in the average interest rate applicable to these borrowings would change our annualized interest expense by approximately $1.0$3.9 million as of December 31, 2019.2021. We may enter into interest rate swaps, collars or similar instruments with the objective of reducing interest rate volatility relating to our borrowing costs.
Our raw materials are subject to price volatility caused by weather, supply conditions, political and economic variables and other unpredictable factors. Historically, we have not used futures, options or swap contracts to manage the volatility related to the above exposures. However, the refinery catalysts business has used financing arrangements to provide long-term protection against changes in metals prices. We seek to limit our exposure by entering into long-term contracts when available, and we seek price increase limitations through contracts. These contracts do not have a significant impact on our results of operations.

73

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with management’s and our directors’ authorizations; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework 2013 set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The concept of reasonable assurance is based on the recognition that there are inherent limitations in all systems of internal control. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 excludes the 60% ownership interest in the MARBL Lithium Joint Venture because it was formed as part of a purchase business combination of 60% ownership interest in Mineral Resources Limited’s (“MRL”) Wodgina hard rock lithium mine project (“Wodgina Project”) during 2019. The MARBL Lithium Joint Venture is consolidated at our proportionate share, whose proportionate assets represent 18% of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of December 31, 2019.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192021 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
/S/ LJ. KUTHERENT C. KMISSAM IVASTERS
Luther C. Kissam IV
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
February 26, 2020


J. Kent Masters
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
February 18, 2022

74

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Albemarle Corporation:Corporation

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Albemarle Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenues with contracts from customers in 2018.

BasisRevenue Recognition
Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for Opinionstransferring goods or providing services, and is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied under the terms of contracts with our customers. A performance obligation is deemed to be satisfied when control of the product or service is transferred to our customer. The transaction price of a contract, or the amount we expect to receive upon satisfaction of all performance obligations, is determined by reference to the contract’s terms and includes adjustments, if applicable, for any variable consideration, such as customer rebates, noncash consideration or consideration payable to the customer, although these adjustments are generally not material. Where a contract contains more than one distinct performance obligation, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price of each performance obligation, although these situations do not occur frequently and are generally not built into our contracts. Any unsatisfied performance obligations are not material. Standalone selling prices are based on prices we charge to our customers, which in some cases is based on established market prices. Sales and other similar taxes collected from customers on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue. Our payment terms are generally between 30 to 90 days, however, they vary by market factors, such as customer size, creditworthiness, geography and competitive environment.
All of our revenue is derived from contracts with customers, and almost all of our contracts with customers contain one performance obligation for the transfer of goods where such performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time. Control of a product is deemed to be transferred to the customer upon shipment or delivery. Significant portions of our sales are sold free on board shipping point or on an equivalent basis, while delivery terms of other transactions are based upon specific contractual arrangements. Our standard terms of delivery are generally included in our contracts of sale, order confirmation documents and invoices, while the timing between shipment and delivery generally ranges between 1 and 45 days. Costs for shipping and handling activities, whether performed before or after the customer obtains control of the goods, are accounted for as fulfillment costs.
The Company currently utilizes the following practical expedients, as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
All sales and other pass-through taxes are excluded from contract value;
In utilizing the modified retrospective transition method, no adjustment was necessary for contracts that did not cross over the reporting year;
We will not consider the possibility of a contract having a significant financing component (which would effectively attribute a portion of the sales price to interest income) unless, if at contract inception, the expected payment terms (from time of delivery or other relevant criterion) are more than one year;
If our right to customer payment is directly related to the value of our completed performance, we recognize revenue consistent with the invoicing right; and
We expense as incurred all costs of obtaining a contract incremental to any costs/compensation attributable to individual product sales/shipments for contracts where the amortization period for such costs would otherwise be one year or less.
58

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Certain products we produce are made to our customer’s specifications where such products have no alternative use or would need significant rework costs in order to be sold to another customer. In management’s judgment, control of these arrangements is transferred to the customer at a point in time (upon shipment or delivery) and not over the time they are produced. Therefore revenue is recognized upon shipment or delivery of these products.
Costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers are not significant and are expensed immediately as the amortization period would be one year or less. When the Company incurs pre-production or other fulfillment costs in connection with an existing or specific anticipated contract and such costs are recoverable through margin or explicitly reimbursable, such costs are capitalized and amortized to Cost of goods sold on a systematic basis that is consistent with the pattern of transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates, which is less than one year. We record bad debt expense in specific situations when we determine the customer is unable to meet its financial obligation.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and other intangibles acquired in a business combination in conformity with current accounting guidance which requires goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets to not be amortized.
We test goodwill for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of our reporting units to the related carrying value. Our reporting units are either our operating business segments or one level below our operating business segments for which discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed by the business management. In applying the goodwill impairment test, we initially perform a qualitative test (“Step 0”), where we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance of the reporting units and other entity and reporting unit specific events. If after assessing these qualitative factors, we determine it is “more-likely-than-not” that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we perform a quantitative test (“Step 1”). During Step 1, we estimate the fair value based on present value techniques involving future cash flows. Future cash flows for all reporting units include assumptions about revenue growth rates, adjusted EBITDA margins, discount rate as well as other economic or industry-related factors. For the Refining Solutions reporting unit, the revenue growth rates and adjusted EBITDA margins were deemed to be significant assumptions. Significant management judgment is involved in estimating these variables and they include inherent uncertainties since they are forecasting future events. We perform a sensitivity analysis by using a range of inputs to confirm the reasonableness of these estimates being used in the goodwill impairment analysis. We use a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) approach to determine our discount rate for goodwill recoverability testing. Our WACC calculation incorporates industry-weighted average returns on debt and equity from a market perspective. The factors in this calculation are largely external to Albemarle and, therefore, are beyond our control. We test our recorded goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year or upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying amounts. We performed our annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2021 and no evidence of impairment was noted from the analysis. As a result, we concluded there was no impairment as of that date.
We assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names and trademarks, for impairment annually and between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment standard allows us to first assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only required if we determine, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If we determine based on the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, an impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to its carrying amount. During the year ended December 31, 2021, no evidence of impairment was noted from the analysis for our indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Definite-lived intangible assets, such as purchased technology, patents and customer lists, are amortized over their estimated useful lives generally for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years. Except for customer lists and relationships associated with the majority of our Lithium business, which are amortized using the pattern of economic benefit method, definite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method. We evaluate the recovery of our definite-lived intangible assets by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. See Note 12, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

59

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Resource Development Expenses
We incur costs in resource exploration, evaluation and development during the different phases of our resource development projects. Exploration costs incurred before the declaration of proven and probable resources are generally expensed as incurred. After proven and probable resources are declared, exploration, evaluation and development costs necessary to bring the property to commercial capacity or increase the capacity or useful life are capitalized. Any costs to maintain the production capacity in a property under production are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized resource costs are depleted using the units-of-production method. Our resource development assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
Under authoritative accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets. As required, we recognize a balance sheet asset or liability for each of our pension and OPEB plans equal to the plan’s funded status as of the measurement date. The primary assumptions are as follows:
Discount Rate—The discount rate is used in calculating the present value of benefits, which is based on projections of benefit payments to be made in the future.
Expected Return on Plan Assets—We project the future return on plan assets based on prior performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plans as well as the expected long-term allocation of plan assets for these investments. These projected returns reduce the net benefit costs recorded currently.
Rate of Compensation Increase—For salary-related plans, we project employees’ annual pay increases, which are used to project employees’ pension benefits at retirement.
Mortality Assumptions—Assumptions about life expectancy of plan participants are used in the measurement of related plan obligations.
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized annually in our consolidated statements of income in the fourth quarter and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for a remeasurement during a fiscal year. The remaining components of pension and OPEB plan expense, primarily service cost, interest cost and expected return on assets, are recorded on a monthly basis. The market-related value of assets equals the actual market value as of the date of measurement.
During 2021, we made changes to assumptions related to discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets. We consider available information that we deem relevant when selecting each of these assumptions.
Our U.S. defined benefit plans for non-represented employees are closed to new participants, with no additional benefits accruing under these plans as participants’ accrued benefits have been frozen. In selecting the discount rates for the U.S. plans, we consider expected benefit payments on a plan-by-plan basis. As a result, the Company uses different discount rates for each plan depending on the demographics of participants and the expected timing of benefit payments. For 2021, the discount rates were calculated using the results from a bond matching technique developed by Milliman, which matched the future estimated annual benefit payments of each respective plan against a portfolio of bonds of high quality to determine the discount rate. We believe our selected discount rates are determined using preferred methodology under authoritative accounting guidance and accurately reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2021 measurement date.
In selecting the discount rates for the foreign plans, we look at long-term yields on AA-rated corporate bonds when available. Our actuaries have developed yield curves based on the yields of constituent bonds in the various indices as well as on other market indicators such as swap rates, particularly at the longer durations. For the Eurozone, we apply the Aon Hewitt yield curve to projected cash flows from the relevant plans to derive the discount rate. For the U.K., the discount rate is determined by applying the Aon Hewitt yield curve for typical schemes of similar duration to projected cash flows of Albemarle’s U.K. plan. In other countries where there is not a sufficiently deep market of high-quality corporate bonds, we set the discount rate by referencing the yield on government bonds of an appropriate duration.
At December 31, 2021, the weighted-average discount rate for the U.S. and foreign pension plans decreased to 2.86% and 1.44%, respectively, from 2.50% and 0.86%, respectively, at December 31, 2020 to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2021 measurement date. The discount rate for the OPEB plans at December 31, 2021 and 2020 was 2.85% and 2.49%, respectively.
In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we consider past performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plan as well as the expected long-term allocations of plan assets to these investments. For the years 2021 and 2020, the weighted-average expected rate of return on U.S. pension plan assets was 6.88%, and the weighted-average
60

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
expected rate of return on foreign pension plan assets was 3.98% and 4.07%, respectively. Effective January 1, 2022, the weighted-average expected rate of return on U.S. and foreign pension plan assets is 6.89% and 3.85%, respectively.
In projecting the rate of compensation increase, we consider past experience in light of movements in inflation rates. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the assumed weighted-average rate of compensation increase was 3.20% and 3.82%, respectively, for our foreign pension plans.

For the purpose of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December 31, 2021 and 2020, we used the Pri-2012 Mortality Tables along with the MP-2021 and MP-2020 Mortality Improvement Scale, respectively, published by the SOA.
At December 31, 2021, the assumed rate of increase in the pre-65 and post-65 per capita cost of covered health care benefits for U.S. retirees was zero as the employer-paid premium caps (pre-65 and post-65) were met starting January 1, 2013.
A variance in the assumptions discussed above would have an impact on the projected benefit obligations, the accrued OPEB liabilities, and the annual net periodic pension and OPEB cost. The following table reflects the sensitivities associated with a hypothetical change in certain assumptions, primarily in the U.S. (in thousands):
(Favorable) Unfavorable
1% Increase1% Decrease
Increase (Decrease)
in  Benefit Obligation
Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Cost
Increase (Decrease)
in  Benefit Obligation
Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Cost
Actuarial Assumptions
Discount Rate:
Pension$(104,285)$4,919 $120,116 $(6,514)
Other postretirement benefits$(4,520)$276 $5,414 $(348)
Expected return on plan assets:
Pension$(6,796)$6,796 
Other postretirement benefits$— $— 
* Not applicable.
Of the $700.2 million total pension and postretirement assets at December 31, 2021, $96.3 million, or approximately 14%, are measured using the net asset value as a practical expedient. Gains or losses attributable to these assets are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as either an increase or decrease in plan assets. See Note 15, “Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Income Taxes
We use the liability method for determining our income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. In order to record deferred tax assets and liabilities, we are following guidance under ASU 2015-17, which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet, along with any related valuation allowance. Tax effects are released from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income using either the specific identification approach or the portfolio approach based on the nature of the underlying item.
Deferred income taxes are provided for the estimated income tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also provided for operating losses, capital losses and certain tax credit carryovers. A valuation allowance, reducing deferred tax assets, is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of such deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character. Although realization is not assured, we do not establish a valuation allowance when we believe it is more likely than not that a net deferred tax asset will be realized.
We only recognize a tax benefit after concluding that it is more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained upon audit by the respective taxing authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. Once the recognition threshold is met, we recognize a tax benefit measured as the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in our judgment, is greater
61

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
than 50% likely to be realized. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in Income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Due to the statute of limitations, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax audits by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for years prior to 2017. Due to the statute of limitations, we also are no longer subject to U.S. state income tax audits prior to 2017.
With respect to jurisdictions outside the U.S., several audits are in process. We have audits ongoing for the years 2011 through 2020 related to Germany, Italy, Belgium, South Africa and Chile, some of which are for entities that have since been divested.
While we believe we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
Since the timing of resolutions and/or closure of tax audits are uncertain, it is difficult to predict with certainty the range of reasonably possible significant increases or decreases in the liability related to uncertain tax positions that may occur within the next twelve months. Our current view is that it is reasonably possible that we could record a decrease in the liability related to uncertain tax positions, relating to a number of issues, up to approximately $0.3 million as a result of closure of tax statutes. As a result of the sale of the Chemetall Surface Treatment business in 2016, we agreed to indemnify certain income and non-income tax liabilities, including uncertain tax positions, associated with the entities sold. The associated liability is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities. See Note 16, “Other Noncurrent Liabilities,” and Note 21, “Income Taxes,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further details.
We have designated the undistributed earnings of a portion of our foreign operations as indefinitely reinvested and as a result we do not provide for deferred income taxes on the unremitted earnings of these subsidiaries. Our foreign earnings are computed under U.S. federal tax earnings and profits (“E&P”) principles. In general, to the extent our financial reporting book basis over tax basis of a foreign subsidiary exceeds these E&P amounts, deferred taxes have not been provided, as they are essentially permanent in duration. The determination of the amount of such unrecognized deferred tax liability is not practicable. We provide for deferred income taxes on our undistributed earnings of foreign operations that are not deemed to be indefinitely invested. We will continue to evaluate our permanent investment assertion taking into consideration all relevant and current tax laws.

Financial Condition and Liquidity
Overview
The principal uses of cash in our business generally have been capital investments and resource development costs, funding working capital, and service of debt. We also make contributions to our defined benefit pension plans, pay dividends to our shareholders and repurchase shares of our common stock. Historically, cash to fund the needs of our business has been principally provided by cash from operations, debt financing and equity issuances.
We are continually focused on working capital efficiency particularly in the areas of accounts receivable, payables and inventory. We anticipate that cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from divestitures and borrowings will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses, satisfy debt service obligations, fund capital expenditures and other investing activities, fund pension contributions and pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flow
Our cash and cash equivalents were $439.3 million at December 31, 2021 as compared to $746.7 million at December 31, 2020. Cash provided by operating activities was $344.3 million, $798.9 million and $719.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2021 versus 2020 was primarily due to the $332.5 million payment to Huntsman to settle a legacy Rockwood legal matter, lower earnings from the FCS business sold on June 1, 2021, as well as increased inventory balances and accounts receivable due to the timing of payments. This was partially offset by increased sales in our Lithium and Bromine segments. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2020 versus 2019 was primarily due to lower working capital outflow, including inventory reductions and the timing of receivable collections, as well as the previously announced Company-wide cost savings initiative and increased dividends from unconsolidated investments, which more than offset lower revenues in each of our reportable segments. The working capital
62

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
outflow in 2020 also included the payment of $61.5 million related to stamp duties in Australia levied on the assets purchased as part of the acquisition of the Wodgina Project completed in 2019.
During 2021, cash on hand, cash provided by operations, net cash proceeds of $289.8 million from the sale of the FCS business, $388.5 million of commercial paper borrowings and the $1.5 billion net proceeds from our underwritten public offering of common stock funded debt principal payments of approximately $1.5 billion, early extinguishment of debt fees of (24,877), $332.5 million of the legal settlement related to the legacy Rockwood business arbitration, $953.7 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $177.9 million, and pension and postretirement contributions of $30.3 million. During 2020, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and proceeds from borrowings of $200 million from one of our credit facilities funded $850.0 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $161.8 million, and pension and postretirement contributions of $16.4 million. In addition, during 2020 we received $11.0 million in proceeds from the sale of our ownership interest in the SOCC joint venture during and paid $22.6 million of agreed upon purchase price adjustments for the Wodgina Project acquisition. During 2019, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and proceeds from borrowings of $1.60 billion funded the Wodgina Project acquisition discussed below, $851.8 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $152.2 million, the repayment of $175.2 million of senior notes, and pension and postretirement contributions of $16.5 million. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, our consolidated joint venture, JBC, paid dividends of approximately $247.8 million, $63.7 million and $224.9 million, respectively, which resulted in dividends to noncontrolling interests of $96.1 million, $32.1 million and $83.2 million, respectively.
On June 1, 2021, we completed the sale of the FCS business to Grace for proceeds of approximately $570 million, consisting of $300 million in cash and the issuance to Albemarle of preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary having an aggregate stated value of $270 million. The preferred equity can be redeemed at Grace’s option under certain conditions and will accrue payment-in-kind dividends at an annual rate of 12% beginning on June 1, 2023, two years after issuance.
On February 8, 2021, we completed an underwritten public offering of 8,496,773 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $153.00 per share. We also granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 1,274,509 shares, which was exercised. The total gross proceeds from this offering were approximately $1.5 billion, before deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and commissions. In the first quarter of 2021, we made the following debt principal payments using the net proceeds from this underwritten public offering:
€123.8 million of the 1.125% notes due in November 2025
€393.0 million, the remaining balance, of the 1.875% Senior notes originally due in December 2021
$128.4 million of the 3.45% Senior notes due in November 2029
$200.0 million, the remaining balance, of the floating rate notes originally due in November 2022
€183.3 million, the outstanding balance, of the unsecured credit facility originally entered into on August 14, 2019, as amended and restated on December 15, 2020 (the “2019 Credit Facility”)
$325.0 million, the outstanding balance, of the commercial paper notes
On October 31, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in the Wodgina Project for a total purchase price of $1.3 billion. The purchase price is comprised of $820 million in cash and the transfer of 40% interest in certain lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built by Albemarle in Kemerton, Western Australia, valued at approximately $480 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we paid $22.6 million of agreed upon purchase price adjustments. The cash consideration was funded by the unsecured credit facility entered into on August 14, 2019.
In November 2019, we issued notes totaling $500.0 million and €1.0 billion. The net proceeds from the issuance of these notes were used to repay the $1.0 billion balance of the unsecured credit facility entered into on August 14, 2019, a large portion of approximately $370 million of commercial paper notes, the remaining balance of $175.2 million of the senior notes issued on December 10, 2010 (“2010 Senior Notes”), and for general corporate purposes. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million in Interest and financing expenses, representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of the 2010 Senior Notes.
Capital expenditures were $953.7 million, $850.5 million and $851.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and were incurred mainly for plant, machinery and equipment, and mining resource development.
63

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We expect our capital expenditures to be between $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion in 2022 primarily for Lithium growth and capacity increases, primarily in Australia, China and Silver Peak, Nevada, as well as productivity and continuity of operations projects in all segments. Train I of our Kemerton, Western Australia plant was completed in December 2021, but due to the ongoing labor shortages and COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions in Western Australia, Train II construction is now expected to be completed in the second half of 2022. Commercial sales volume from Train I will begin in 2022 and Train II in 2023.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we incurred $12.7 million, $17.3 million and $20.7 million of costs related to the acquisition, integration and potential divestitures for various significant projects, including the acquisition of the Wodgina Project in 2019, which primarily consisted of professional services and advisory fees.
The Company is permitted to repurchase up to a maximum of 15,000,000 shares under a share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors. There were no shares of our common stock repurchased during 2021, 2020 or 2019. At December 31, 2021, there were 7,396,263 remaining shares available for repurchase under the Company’s authorized share repurchase program.
Net current assets decreased to approximately $133.6 million at December 31, 2021 from $404.3 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents to pay a portion of the legacy Rockwood legal matter and for capital expenditures, as well as the increase in accrued expenses for the remaining payment of the legacy Rockwood legal matter. This was partially offset by the repayment of the current portion of long-term debt using proceeds from our underwritten public offering of our common stock. Additional changes in the components of net current assets are primarily due to the timing of the sale of goods and other ordinary transactions leading up to the balance sheet dates and are not the result of any policy changes by the Company, and do not reflect any change in either the quality of our net current assets or our expectation of success in converting net working capital to cash in the ordinary course of business.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, our cash and cash equivalents included $374.0 million and $492.8 million, respectively, held by our foreign subsidiaries. The majority of these foreign cash balances are associated with earnings that we have asserted are indefinitely reinvested and which we plan to use to support our continued growth plans outside the U.S. through funding of capital expenditures, acquisitions, research, operating expenses or other similar cash needs of our foreign operations. From time to time, we repatriate cash associated with earnings from our foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. for normal operating needs through intercompany dividends, but only from subsidiaries whose earnings we have not asserted to be indefinitely reinvested or whose earnings qualify as “previously taxed income” as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we repatriated approximately $0.9 million, $1.8 million and $351.9 million of cash, respectively, as part of these foreign earnings cash repatriation activities.
While we continue to closely monitor our cash generation, working capital management and capital spending in light of continuing uncertainties in the global economy, we believe that we will continue to have the financial flexibility and capability to opportunistically fund future growth initiatives. Additionally, we anticipate that future capital spending, including business acquisitions, share repurchases and other cash outlays, should be financed primarily with cash flow provided by operations and cash on hand, with additional cash needed, if any, provided by borrowings. The amount and timing of any additional borrowings will depend on our specific cash requirements.
Long-Term Debt
We currently have the following notes outstanding:
Issue Month/YearPrincipal (in millions)Interest RateInterest Payment DatesMaturity Date
November 2019€371.71.125%November 25November 25, 2025
November 2019€500.01.625%November 25November 25, 2028
November 2019(a)
$171.63.45% May 15 and November 15November 15, 2029
November 2014(a)
$425.04.15%June 1 and December 1December 1, 2024
November 2014(a)
$350.05.45%June 1 and December 1December 1, 2044

(a)    Denotes senior notes.
Our senior notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all our other senior unsecured indebtedness from time to time outstanding. The notes are effectively subordinated to all of our existing or future secured indebtedness and to the existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries. As is customary for such long-term debt instruments, each series of notes
64

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
outstanding has terms that allow us to redeem the notes before maturity, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of these notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of redemption) discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis using the comparable government rate (as defined in the indentures governing these notes) plus between 25 and 40 basis points, depending on the series of notes, plus, in each case, accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption. Holders may require us to purchase such notes at 101% upon a change of control triggering event, as defined in the indentures. These notes are subject to typical events of default, including bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment and the acceleration of certain subsidiary indebtedness of $40 million or more caused by a nonpayment default.
Our Euro notes issued in 2019 are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment to all our other unsecured senior obligations. The Euro notes are effectively subordinated to all of our existing or future secured indebtedness and to the existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries. As is customary for such long-term debt instruments, each series of notes outstanding has terms that allow us to redeem the notes before their maturity, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal thereof and interest thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to, but excluding, the date of redemption) discounted to the redemption date on an annual basis using the bond rate (as defined in the indentures governing these notes) plus between 25 and 35 basis points, depending on the series of notes, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption. Holders may require us to purchase such notes at 101% upon a change of control triggering event, as defined in the indentures. These notes are subject to typical events of default, including bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment and the acceleration of certain subsidiary indebtedness exceeding $100 million caused by a nonpayment default.
Our revolving, unsecured credit agreement dated as of June 21, 2018, as amended on August 14, 2019 and further amended on May 11, 2020 (the “2018 Credit Agreement”) currently provides for borrowings of up to $1.0 billion and matures on August 9, 2024. Borrowings under the 2018 Credit Agreement bear interest at variable rates based on an average LIBOR for deposits in the relevant currency plus an applicable margin which ranges from 0.910% to 1.500%, depending on the Company’s credit rating from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services LLC (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”). The applicable margin on the facility was 1.125% as of December 31, 2021. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2018 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2021.
On August 14, 2019, the Company entered into the $1.2 billion 2019 Credit Facility with several banks and other financial institutions, which was amended and restated on December 15, 2020 and again on December 10, 2021. The lenders’ commitment to provide new loans under the amended 2019 Credit Facility permits up to four borrowings by the Company in an aggregate amount equal to $750 million. The 2019 Credit Facility terminates on December 9, 2022, with each such loan maturing 364 days after the funding of such loan. The Company can request that the maturity date of loans be extended for a period of up to four additional years, but any such extension is subject to the approval of the lenders. At the option of the Company, the borrowings under the 2019 Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates based on either the base rate or LIBOR for deposits in U.S. dollars, in each case plus an applicable margin which ranges from 0.000% to 0.375% for base rate borrowings or 0.875% to 1.375% for LIBOR borrowings, depending on the Company’s credit rating from S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. The applicable margin on the 2019 Credit Facility was 1.125% as of December 31, 2021. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2019 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2021.
Borrowings under the under the 2019 Credit Facility and 2018 Credit Agreement (together the “Credit Agreements”) are conditioned upon satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the absence of defaults. The Company is subject to one financial covenant, as well as customary affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenant requires that the Company’s consolidated net funded debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio (as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreements) be less than or equal to 4.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021 and 3.50:1 for fiscal quarters thereafter, subject to adjustments in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreements relating to a consummation of an acquisition where the consideration includes cash proceeds from issuance of funded debt in excess of $500 million. The Credit Agreements also contain customary default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants and cross-defaults to other material indebtedness. The occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreements could result in all loans and other obligations becoming immediately due and payable and each such Credit Agreement being terminated. Certain representations, warranties and covenants under the 2018 Credit Agreement were conformed to those under the 2019 Credit Facility following the amendments to those agreements.
On May 29, 2013, we entered into agreements to initiate a commercial paper program on a private placement basis under which we may issue unsecured commercial paper notes (the “Commercial Paper Notes”) from time-to-time up to a maximum
65

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time of $750.0 million. The proceeds from the issuance of the Commercial Paper Notes are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of other debt of the Company. The Credit Agreements are available to repay the Commercial Paper Notes, if necessary. Aggregate borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreements and the Commercial Paper Notes will not exceed the $1.75 billion current maximum amount available under the Credit Agreements. The Commercial Paper Notes will be sold at a discount from par, or alternatively, will be sold at par and bear interest at rates that will vary based upon market conditions at the time of issuance. The maturities of the Commercial Paper Notes will vary but may not exceed 397 days from the date of issue. The definitive documents relating to the commercial paper program contain customary representations, warranties, default and indemnification provisions. At December 31, 2021, we had $388.5 million of Commercial Paper Notes outstanding bearing a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 0.46% and a weighted-average maturity of 20 days. The Commercial Paper Notes are classified as Current portion of long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The non-current portion of our long-term debt amounted to $2.00 billion at December 31, 2021, compared to $2.77 billion at December 31, 2020. In addition, at December 31, 2021, we had the ability to borrow $1.36 billion under our commercial paper program and the Credit Agreements, and $210.6 million under other existing lines of credit, subject to various financial covenants under our Credit Agreements. We have the ability and intent to refinance our borrowings under our other existing credit lines with borrowings under the Credit Agreements, as applicable. Therefore, the amounts outstanding under those credit lines, if any, are classified as long-term debt. We believe that as of December 31, 2021 we were, and currently are, in compliance with all of our debt covenants. For additional information about our long-term debt obligations, see Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and others, we have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, including bank guarantees and letters of credit, which totaled approximately $81.2 million at December 31, 2021. None of these off-balance sheet arrangements has, or is likely to have, a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
Liquidity Outlook
We anticipate that cash on hand and cash provided by operating activities, divestitures and borrowings will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses, satisfy debt service obligations, fund any capital expenditures and share repurchases, make acquisitions, make pension contributions and pay dividends for the foreseeable future. Our main focus during the continued uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic is to continue to maintain financial flexibility by continuing our cost savings initiative, while still protecting our employees and customers, committing to shareholder returns and maintaining an investment grade rating. Over the next three years, in terms of uses of cash, we will continue to invest in growth of the businesses and return value to shareholders. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate the merits of any opportunities that may arise for acquisitions of businesses or assets, which may require additional liquidity.
Our growth investments include the recently announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity of Tianyuan for approximately $200 million in cash. Tianyuan's operations include a recently constructed lithium processing plant that has designed annual conversion capacity of up to 25,000 metric tons of LCE and is capable of producing battery-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide. We expect the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, to close in the first half of 2022. In addition, we announced agreements for strategic investments in China with plans to build two lithium hydroxide conversion plants, each initially targeting 50,000 metric tons per year. We expect construction of these conversion plants to begin in 2022 and be completed by the end of 2024.
Overall, with generally strong cash-generative businesses and no significant long-term debt maturities before November 2024, we believe we have, and will be able to maintain, a solid liquidity position. Our annual maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in millions): 2022—$389.9; 2023—$0.0; 2024—$425.0; 2025—$426.6; 2026—$0.0; thereafter—$1,166.4. Obligations in 2022 primarily include our outstanding Commercial Paper Notes of $388.5 million with a weighted average maturity of 20 days. In addition, we expect to make interest payments on those long-term debt obligations as follows (in millions): 2022—$58.5; 2023—$56.6; 2024—$55.1; 2025—$38.5; 2026—$34.1; thereafter—$378.1. For variable-rate debt obligations, projected interest payments are calculated using the December 31, 2021 weighted average interest rate of approximately 0.40%.
In addition, we expect our capital expenditures to be between $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion in 2022, primarily for Lithium growth and capacity increases, primarily in Australia, China and Silver Peak, Nevada, as well as productivity and continuity of operations projects in all segments. Train I of our Kemerton, Western Australia plant was completed in December 2021, but due to the ongoing labor shortages and COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions in Western Australia, Train II construction is now
66

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
expected to be completed in the second half of 2022. Commercial sales volume from Train I will begin in 2022 and Train II in 2023. As of December 31, 2021, we have also committed to approximately $99.4 million of payments to third-party vendors in the normal course of business to secure raw materials for our production processes, with approximately $78.3 million to be paid in 2022. In order to secure materials, sometimes for long durations, these contracts mandate a minimum amount of product to be purchased at predetermined rates over a set timeframe.
See Note 18, “Leases,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for our annual expected payments under our operating lease obligations at December 31, 2021.
In 2022, we expect to pay $23.8 million of the $258.0 million balance remaining from the transition tax on foreign earnings as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) signed into law in December 2017. The one-time transition tax imposed by the TCJA is based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits that we previously deferred from U.S. income taxes and is payable over an eight-year period, with the final payment made in 2026.
Contributions to our domestic and foreign qualified and nonqualified pension plans, including our supplemental executive retirement plan, are expected to approximate $12 million in 2022. We may choose to make additional pension contributions in excess of this amount. We made contributions of approximately $27.6 million to our domestic and foreign pension plans (both qualified and nonqualified) during the year ended December 31, 2021.
The liability related to uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities totaled $27.7 million and $14.7 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Related assets for corresponding offsetting benefits recorded in Other assets totaled $32.9 million and $24.1 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We cannot estimate the amounts of any cash payments during the next twelve months associated with these liabilities and are unable to estimate the timing of any such cash payments in the future at this time.
Our cash flows from operations may be negatively affected by adverse consequences to our customers and the markets in which we compete as a result of moderating global economic conditions and reduced capital availability. The COVID-19 pandemic has not had a material impact on our liquidity to date; however, we cannot predict the overall impact in terms of cash flow generation as that will depend on the length and severity of the outbreak. As a result, we are planning for various economic scenarios and actively monitoring our balance sheet to maintain the financial flexibility needed.
Although we maintain business relationships with a diverse group of financial institutions as sources of financing, an adverse change in their credit standing could lead them to not honor their contractual credit commitments to us, decline funding under our existing but uncommitted lines of credit with them, not renew their extensions of credit or not provide new financing to us. While the global corporate bond and bank loan markets remain strong, periods of elevated uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic or global economic and/or geopolitical concerns may limit efficient access to such markets for extended periods of time. If such concerns heighten, we may incur increased borrowing costs and reduced credit capacity as our various credit facilities mature. If the U.S. Federal Reserve or similar national reserve banks in other countries decide to tighten the monetary supply in response, for example, to improving economic conditions, we may incur increased borrowing costs (as interest rates increase on our variable rate credit facilities, as our various credit facilities mature or as we refinance any maturing fixed rate debt obligations), although these cost increases would be partially offset by increased income rates on portions of our cash deposits.
On February 6, 2017, Huntsman, a subsidiary of Huntsman Corporation, filed a lawsuit in New York state court against Rockwood, Rockwood Specialties, Inc., certain former executives of Rockwood and its subsidiaries—Seifollah Ghasemi, Thomas Riordan, Andrew Ross, and Michael Valente, and Albemarle. The lawsuit arises out of Huntsman’s acquisition of certain Rockwood subsidiaries in connection with a stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”), dated September 17, 2013. Before that transaction closed on October 1, 2014, Albemarle began discussions with Rockwood to purchase all outstanding equity of Rockwood and did so in a transaction that closed on January 12, 2015. Huntsman’s complaint asserted that certain technology that Rockwood had developed for a production facility in Augusta, Georgia, and which was among the assets that Huntsman acquired pursuant to the SPA, did not work, and that Rockwood and the defendant executives had intentionally misled Huntsman about that technology in connection with the Huntsman-Rockwood transaction. The complaint asserted claims for, among other things, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the SPA, and sought certain costs for completing construction of the production facility.
On March 10, 2017, Albemarle moved in New York state court to compel arbitration, which was granted on January 8, 2018 (although Huntsman unsuccessfully appealed that decision). Huntsman’s arbitration demand asserted claims substantially similar to those asserted in its state court complaint, and sought various forms of legal remedies, including cost overruns, compensatory damages, expectation damages, punitive damages, and restitution. After a trial, the arbitration panel issued an
67

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
award on October 28, 2021, awarding approximately $600 million (including interest) to be paid by Albemarle to Huntsman, in addition to the possibility of attorney’s fees, costs and expenses. Following the arbitration panel decision, Albemarle reached a settlement with Huntsman to pay $665 million in two equal installments, with the first payment made in December 2021. As a result, the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2021, includes expense of $657.4 million ($508.5 million net of income tax), inclusive of legal fees incurred by Huntsman and other related obligations, to reflect the agreed upon resolution of this legal matter.
In addition, as first reported in 2018, following receipt of information regarding potential improper payments being made by third-party sales representatives of our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, we promptly retained outside counsel and forensic accountants to investigate potential violations of the Company’s Code of Conduct, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other potentially applicable laws. Based on this internal investigation, we have voluntarily self-reported potential issues relating to the use of third-party sales representatives in our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, to the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP, and are cooperating with the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP in their review of these matters. In connection with our internal investigation, we have implemented, and are continuing to implement, appropriate remedial measures. We have commenced discussions with the SEC about a potential resolution.
At this time, we are unable to predict the duration, scope, result, or related costs associated with the investigations. We also are unable to predict what action may be taken by the DOJ, the SEC, or the DPP, or what penalties or remedial actions they may ultimately seek. Any determination that our operations or activities are not, or were not, in compliance with existing laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses. We do not believe, however, that any such fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or liquidity. However, an adverse resolution could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a particular period.
We had cash and cash equivalents totaling $439.3 million as of December 31, 2021, of which $374.0 million is held by our foreign subsidiaries. This cash represents an important source of our liquidity and is invested in bank accounts or money market investments with no limitations on access. The cash held by our foreign subsidiaries is intended for use outside of the U.S. We anticipate that any needs for liquidity within the U.S. in excess of our cash held in the U.S. can be readily satisfied with borrowings under our existing U.S. credit facilities or our commercial paper program.
Guarantor Financial Information
Albemarle Wodgina Pty Ltd Issued Notes
Albemarle Wodgina Pty Ltd (the “Issuer”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Albemarle Corporation, issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2029 (the “3.45% Senior Notes”) in November 2019. The 3.45% Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (the “Guarantee”) on a senior unsecured basis by Albemarle Corporation (the “Parent Guarantor”). No direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Parent Guarantor guarantee the 3.45% Senior Notes (such subsidiaries are referred to as the “Non-Guarantors”).
In 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project in Western Australia and formed an unincorporated joint venture with MRL, MARBL, for the exploration, development, mining, processing and production of lithium and other minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) from the Wodgina spodumene mine and for the operation of the Kemerton assets in Western Australia. We participate in the Wodgina Project through our ownership interest in the Issuer.
The Parent Guarantor conducts its U.S. Bromine and Catalysts operations directly, and conducts its other operations (other than operations conducted through the Issuer) through the Non-Guarantors.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are the Issuer’s senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment to the senior indebtedness of the Issuer, effectively subordinated to all of the secured indebtedness of the Issuer, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness, and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of its subsidiaries. The Guarantee is the senior unsecured obligation of the Parent Guarantor and ranks equally in right of payment to the senior indebtedness of the Parent Guarantor, effectively subordinated to the secured debt of the Parent Guarantor to the extent of the value of the assets securing the indebtedness and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of its subsidiaries.
For cash management purposes, the Parent Guarantor transfers cash among itself, the Issuer and the Non-Guarantors through intercompany financing arrangements, contributions or declaration of dividends between the respective parent and its subsidiaries. The transfer of cash under these activities facilitates the ability of the recipient to make specified third-party payments for principal and interest on the Issuer and/or the Parent Guarantor’s outstanding debt, common stock dividends and
68

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
common stock repurchases. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Issuer or the Parent Guarantor to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Parent Guarantor and the Issuer on a combined basis after elimination of (i) intercompany transactions and balances among the Issuer and the Parent Guarantor and (ii) equity in earnings from and investments in any subsidiary that is a Non-Guarantor. Each entity in the combined financial information follows the same accounting policies as described herein.
Summarized Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Net sales(a)
$1,412,913 
Gross profit241,739 
Loss before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments(b)(c)
(607,995)
Net loss attributable to the Guarantor and the Issuer(c)
(558,342)
(a)    Includes net sales to Non-Guarantors of $715.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes intergroup expenses to Non-Guarantors of $114.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes Parent Guarantor’s portion of the gain on sale of the FCS business on June 1, 2021 and the loss for the legacy Rockwood legal matter. In addition, includes Issuer’s loss related to anticipated cost overruns for MRL’s 40% interest in lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton.
Summarized Balance Sheet
At December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Current assets(a)
$961,003 
Net property, plant and equipment2,979,034 
Other non-current assets534,695 
Current liabilities(b)
$2,329,212 
Long-term debt1,002,009 
Other non-current liabilities(c)
7,008,857 
(a)    Includes receivables from Non-Guarantors of $466.6 million at December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes current payables to Non-Guarantors of $1,105.2 million at December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes non-current payables to Non-Guarantors of $6.5 billion at December 31, 2021.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Non-Guarantors. The Non-Guarantors are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to the 3.45% Senior Notes or the Indenture under which the 3.45% Senior Notes were issued, or to make any funds available therefor, whether by dividends, loans, distributions or other payments. Any right that the Parent Guarantor has to receive any assets of any of the Non-Guarantors upon the liquidation or reorganization of any Non-Guarantor, and the consequent rights of holders of the 3.45% Senior Notes to realize proceeds from the sale of any of a Non-Guarantor’s assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of such Non-Guarantor’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of preferred equity interests, if any, of such Non-Guarantor. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of the Non-Guarantors, the Non-Guarantors will pay the holders of their debts, holders of preferred equity interests, if any, and their trade creditors before they will be able to distribute any of their assets to the Parent Guarantor.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are obligations of the Issuer. The Issuer’s cash flow and ability to make payments on the 3.45% Senior Notes could be dependent upon the earnings it derives from the production from MARBL for the Wodgina Project. Absent income received from sales of its share of production from MARBL, the Issuer’s ability to service the 3.45% Senior Notes could be dependent upon the earnings of the Parent Guarantor’s subsidiaries and other joint ventures and the payment of those earnings to the Issuer in the form of equity, loans or advances and through repayment of loans or advances from the Issuer.

69

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
The Issuer’s obligations in respect of MARBL are guaranteed by the Parent Guarantor. Further, under MARBL pursuant to a deed of cross security between the Issuer, the joint venture partner and the manager of the project (the “Manager”), each of the Issuer, and the joint venture partner have granted security to each other and the Manager for the obligations each of the Issuer and the joint venture partner have to each other and to the Manager. The claims of the joint venture partner, the Manager and other secured creditors of the Issuer will have priority as to the assets of the Issuer over the claims of holders of the 3.45% Senior Notes.
Albemarle Corporation Issued Notes
In March 2021, Albemarle New Holding GmbH (the “Subsidiary Guarantor”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Albemarle Corporation, added a full and unconditional guarantee (the “Upstream Guarantee”) to all securities issued and outstanding by Albemarle Corporation (the “Parent Issuer”) and issuable by the Parent Issuer pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of January 20, 2005, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the “Indenture”). No other direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Parent Issuer guarantee these securities (such subsidiaries are referred to as the “Upstream Non-Guarantors”). See Long-term debt section above for a description of the securities issued by the Parent Issuer.
The current securities outstanding under the Indenture are the Parent Issuer’s unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. With respect to any series of securities issued under the Indenture, the Upstream Guarantee is, and will be, an unsecured and unsubordinated obligation of the Subsidiary Guarantor, ranking pari passu with all other existing and future unsubordinated and unsecured indebtedness of the Subsidiary Guarantor.
For cash management purposes, the Parent Issuer transfers cash among itself, the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Upstream Non-Guarantors through intercompany financing arrangements, contributions or declaration of dividends between the respective parent and its subsidiaries. The transfer of cash under these activities facilitates the ability of the recipient to make specified third-party payments for principal and interest on the Parent Issuer and/or the Subsidiary Guarantor’s outstanding debt, common stock dividends and common stock repurchases. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Parent Issuer or the Subsidiary Guarantor to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Parent Issuer on a combined basis after elimination of (i) intercompany transactions and balances among the Parent Issuer and the Subsidiary Guarantor and (ii) equity in earnings from and investments in any subsidiary that is an Upstream Non-Guarantor.
Summarized Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Net sales(a)
$1,412,913 
Gross profit259,314 
Loss before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments(b)(c)
(368,737)
Net loss attributable to the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Parent Issuer(c)
(320,726)
(a)    Includes net sales to Non-Guarantors of $715.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes intergroup expenses to Non-Guarantors of $17.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes the Parent Issuer’s portion of the gain on sale of the FCS business on June 1, 2021 and the loss for the legacy Rockwood legal matter.
70

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Summarized Balance Sheet
At December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Current assets(a)
$1,039,391 
Net property, plant and equipment754,818 
Other non-current assets(b)
1,634,883 
Current liabilities(c)
$2,174,360 
Long-term debt1,755,026 
Other non-current liabilities(d)
6,404,958 
(a)    Includes current receivables from Non-Guarantors of $576.1 million at December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes noncurrent receivables from Non-Guarantors of $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes current payables to Non-Guarantors of $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021.
(d)    Includes non-current payables to Non-Guarantors of $5.8 billion at December 31, 2021.
These securities are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Upstream Non-Guarantors. The Upstream Non-Guarantors are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to these securities or the Indenture under which these securities were issued, or to make any funds available therefor, whether by dividends, loans, distributions or other payments. Any right that the Subsidiary Guarantor has to receive any assets of any of the Upstream Non-Guarantors upon the liquidation or reorganization of any Upstream Non-Guarantors, and the consequent rights of holders of these securities to realize proceeds from the sale of any of an Upstream Non-Guarantor’s assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of such Upstream Non-Guarantor’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of preferred equity interests, if any, of such Upstream Non-Guarantor. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of the Upstream Non-Guarantors, the Upstream Non-Guarantors will pay the holders of their debts, holders of preferred equity interests, if any, and their trade creditors before they will be able to distribute any of their assets to the Subsidiary Guarantor.

Safety and Environmental Matters
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign requirements regulating the handling, manufacture and use of materials (some of which may be classified as hazardous or toxic by one or more regulatory agencies), the discharge of materials into the environment and the protection of the environment. To our knowledge, we are currently complying and expect to continue to comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws, regulations, statutes and ordinances. Compliance with existing federal, state, local and foreign environmental protection laws is not expected to have a material effect on capital expenditures, earnings or our competitive position, but the costs associated with increased legal or regulatory requirements could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
Among other environmental requirements, we are subject to the federal Superfund law, and similar state laws, under which we may be designated as a PRP, and may be liable for a share of the costs associated with cleaning up various hazardous waste sites. Management believes that in cases in which we may have liability as a PRP, our liability for our share of cleanup is de minimis. Further, almost all such sites represent environmental issues that are quite mature and have been investigated, studied and in many cases settled. In de minimis situations, our policy generally is to negotiate a consent decree and to pay any apportioned settlement, enabling us to be effectively relieved of any further liability as a PRP, except for remote contingencies. In other than de minimis PRP matters, our records indicate that unresolved PRP exposures should be immaterial. We accrue and expense our proportionate share of PRP costs. Because management has been actively involved in evaluating environmental matters, we are able to conclude that the outstanding environmental liabilities for unresolved PRP sites should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations or financial condition.
Our environmental and safety operating costs charged to expense were $43.2 million, $44.9 million and $48.0 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, excluding depreciation of previous capital expenditures, and are expected to be in the same range in the next few years. Costs for remediation have been accrued and payments related to sites are charged against accrued liabilities, which at December 31, 2021 totaled approximately $46.6 million, an increase of $0.8 million from $45.8 million at December 31, 2020. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a reconciliation of our environmental liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
71

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We believe that any sum we may be required to pay in connection with environmental remediation and asset retirement obligation matters in excess of the amounts recorded should occur over a period of time and should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows on a consolidated annual basis, although any such sum could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows in a particular quarterly reporting period.
Capital expenditures for pollution-abatement and safety projects, including such costs that are included in other projects, were approximately $55.4 million, $40.4 million and $44.4 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In the future, capital expenditures for these types of projects may increase due to more stringent environmental regulatory requirements and our efforts in reaching sustainability goals. Management’s estimates of the effects of compliance with governmental pollution-abatement and safety regulations are subject to (a) the possibility of changes in the applicable statutes and regulations or in judicial or administrative construction of such statutes and regulations and (b) uncertainty as to whether anticipated solutions to pollution problems will be successful, or whether additional expenditures may prove necessary.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a discussion of our Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The primary currencies to which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure are the Euro, Japanese Yen, Chinese Renminbi, Australian Dollar and Chilean Peso. In response to greater fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in recent periods, we have increased the degree of exposure risk management activities to minimize the potential impact on earnings.
We manage our foreign currency exposures by balancing certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and through the use, from time to time, of foreign currency forward contracts. The principal objective of such contracts is to minimize the financial impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The counterparties to these contractual agreements are major financial institutions with which we generally have other financial relationships. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties. We do not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
The primary method we use to reduce foreign currency exposure is to identify natural hedges, in which the operating activities denominated in respective currencies across various subsidiaries balance in respect to timing and the underlying exposures. In the event a natural hedge is not available, we may employ a forward contract to reduce exposure, generally expiring within one year. While these contracts are subject to fluctuations in value, such fluctuations are intended to offset the changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we entered into a foreign currency forward contract to hedge the cash flow exposure of non-functional currency purchases during the construction of the Kemerton plant in Australia. This contract has been designated as an effective hedging instrument, and beginning the date of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of this contract to our reporting currency have been and will be recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. All other gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts not designated as an effective hedging instrument are recognized in Other expenses, net, and generally do not have a significant impact on results of operations.
At December 31, 2021, our financial instruments subject to foreign currency exchange risk consisted of foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate notional value of $654.6 million and with a fair value representing a net asset position of $2.8 million. Fluctuations in the value of these contracts are intended to offset the changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the fair value of our foreign currency hedge portfolio assuming an instantaneous 10% change in select foreign currency exchange rates from their levels as of December 31, 2021, with all other variables held constant. A 10% appreciation of the U.S. Dollar against foreign currencies that we hedge would result in a decrease of approximately $33.6 million in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. A 10% depreciation of the U.S. Dollar against these foreign currencies would result in an increase of approximately $38.0 million in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. The sensitivity of the fair value of our foreign currency hedge portfolio represents changes in fair values estimated based on market conditions as of December 31, 2021, without reflecting the effects of underlying anticipated transactions. When those anticipated transactions are realized, actual effects of changing foreign currency exchange rates could have a material impact on our earnings and cash flows in future periods.
On December 18, 2014, the carrying value of our 1.875% Euro-denominated senior notes was designated as an effective hedge of our net investment in foreign subsidiaries where the Euro serves as the functional currency, and beginning on the date
72

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of these senior notes to our reporting currency have been were recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. In the first quarter of 2021, we repaid the outstanding balance of these senior notes, and as a result, this net investment hedge was discontinued. The balance of foreign exchange revaluation gains and losses associated with this discontinued net investment hedge will remain within accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged net investment is sold or liquidated.
We are exposed to changes in interest rates that could impact our results of operations and financial condition. We manage global interest rate and foreign exchange exposure as part of our regular operational and financing strategies. We had variable interest rate borrowings of $393.7 million and $756.6 million outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These borrowings represented 16% and 21% of total outstanding debt and bore average interest rates of 0.40% and 0.87% at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the average interest rate applicable to these borrowings would change our annualized interest expense by approximately $3.9 million as of December 31, 2021. We may enter into interest rate swaps, collars or similar instruments with the objective of reducing interest rate volatility relating to our borrowing costs.
Our raw materials are subject to price volatility caused by weather, supply conditions, political and economic variables and other unpredictable factors. Historically, we have not used futures, options or swap contracts to manage the volatility related to the above exposures. However, the refinery catalysts business has used financing arrangements to provide long-term protection against changes in metals prices. We seek to limit our exposure by entering into long-term contracts when available, and we seek price increase limitations through contracts. These contracts do not have a significant impact on our results of operations.

73

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, forestablishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded the MARBL joint venture from its assessment ofadequate internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, because it was formed as part of a purchase business combination of 60% ownership interestdefined in Mineral Resources Limited’s (“MRL”) Wodgina hard rock lithium mine project (“Wodgina Project”) during 2019. We have also excluded the MARBL joint venture from our audit of internal control over financial reporting The MARBL joint venture is a 60% owned subsidiary whose proportionate assets excluded from management’s assessmentExchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and our audit of internal control over financial reporting represent 18% of the related consolidated financial statement amount as of December 31, 2019.

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s15d-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles. A company’sin the United States. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles,in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the companyCompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of managementmanagement’s and directors of the company;our directors’ authorizations; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’sour assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework2013 set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The concept of reasonable assurance is based on the recognition that there are inherent limitations in all systems of internal control. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Valuation of Acquired Mineral Reserves
As described in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on October 31, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of a 60% ownership interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project creating a joint venture named MARBL for net consideration of $1,324 million, resulting in approximately $1,005 million of mineral reserves being recorded. The fair value of the mineral reserves is determined using an excess earnings approach, which requires management to estimate future cash flows, net of capital investments in the specific operation. Management’s cash flow projections involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the expected production of the mine over the estimated time period, sales prices, shipment volumes, and expected profit margins. The present value of the projected net cash flows represents the preliminary fair value assigned to mineral reserves. The discount rate is a significant assumption used in the valuation model.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of acquired mineral reserves is a critical audit matter are (i) there was a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in applying procedures relating to the fair value measurement of acquired mineral reserves due to the significant amount of judgment by management when developing the estimate; (ii) significant audit effort was required in evaluating the significant assumptions relating to the estimate, such as the expected production of the mine over the estimated time period, sales prices, shipment volumes, expected profit margins and the discount rate; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuationour internal control over financial reporting as of the mineral reserves, including the assumptions relating to the expected production of the mine over the estimated time period, sales prices, shipment volumes, expected profit margins and the discount rate. These procedures alsoDecember 31, 2021 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included (i) comparing expected production of the mine and shipment volumes to geologist reports related to the ore reserve estimates and information supporting management’s expected extraction of these reserves over the estimated time period; (ii) comparing estimated sales prices to industry projections and other forecast information prepared by the Company; and (iii) comparing expected profit margins to information used by management to support these inputs and assumptions such as benchmarking data, comparisons to other similar operations within the Company, and analysis of specific contracts to determine whether operating expenses were based on supportable costs. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the appropriateness of the Company’s discounted cash flow model and the reasonableness of certain significant assumptions, including the discount rate.

herein.
/S/ J. KENT MASTERS
Albemarle Corporation and SubsidiariesJ. Kent Masters
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
February 18, 2022

74

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 26, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1994.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME


(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Year Ended December 312019 2018 2017
Net sales$3,589,427
 $3,374,950
 $3,071,976
Cost of goods sold2,331,649
 2,157,694
 1,965,700
Gross profit1,257,778
 1,217,256
 1,106,276
Selling, general and administrative expenses533,368
 446,090
 450,286
Research and development expenses58,287
 70,054
 84,330
Gain on sale of business
 (210,428) 
Operating profit666,123
 911,540
 571,660
Interest and financing expenses(57,695) (52,405) (115,350)
Other expenses, net(45,478) (64,434) (9,512)
Income before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments562,950
 794,701
 446,798
Income tax expense88,161
 144,826
 431,817
Income before equity in net income of unconsolidated investments474,789
 649,875
 14,981
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax)129,568
 89,264
 84,487
Net income604,357
 739,139
 99,468
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(71,129) (45,577) (44,618)
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$533,228
 $693,562
 $54,850
Basic earnings per share$5.03
 $6.40
 $0.49
Diluted earnings per share$5.02
 $6.34
 $0.49
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic105,949
 108,427
 110,914
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—diluted106,321
 109,458
 112,380
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 312019 2018 2017
Net income$604,357
 $739,139
 $99,468
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:     
Foreign currency translation(62,031) (150,258) 227,439
Pension and postretirement benefits632
 (138) (97)
Net investment hedge8,441
 25,786
 (41,827)
Cash flow hedge4,847
 
 
Interest rate swap2,591
 (585) 2,116
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(45,520) (125,195) 187,631
Comprehensive income558,837
 613,944
 287,099
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(70,662) (45,396) (45,505)
Comprehensive income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$488,175
 $568,548
 $241,594
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Albemarle Corporation
See
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands)
December 312019 2018
Assets   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$613,110
 $555,320
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts (2019—$3,711; 2018—$4,460)612,651
 605,712
Other accounts receivable67,551
 52,059
Inventories768,984
 700,540
Other current assets162,813
 84,790
Total current assets2,225,109
 1,998,421
Property, plant and equipment, at cost6,817,843
 4,799,063
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization1,908,370
 1,777,979
Net property, plant and equipment4,909,473
 3,021,084
Investments579,813
 528,722
Other assets213,061
 80,135
Goodwill1,578,785
 1,567,169
Other intangibles, net of amortization354,622
 386,143
Total assets$9,860,863
 $7,581,674
Liabilities and Equity   
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$574,138
 $522,516
Accrued expenses553,160
 257,323
Current portion of long-term debt187,336
 307,294
Dividends payable38,764
 35,169
Current operating lease liability23,137
 
Income taxes payable32,461
 60,871
Total current liabilities1,408,996
 1,183,173
Long-term debt2,862,921
 1,397,916
Postretirement benefits50,899
 46,157
Pension benefits292,073
 285,396
Other noncurrent liabilities754,536
 526,942
Deferred income taxes397,858
 382,982
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

 

Equity:   
Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity:   
Common stock, $.01 par value (authorized 150,000 shares), issued and outstanding — 106,040 in 2019 and 105,616 in 20181,061
 1,056
Additional paid-in capital1,383,446
 1,368,897
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(395,735) (350,682)
Retained earnings2,943,478
 2,566,050
Total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity3,932,250
 3,585,321
Noncontrolling interests161,330
 173,787
Total equity4,093,580
 3,759,108
Total liabilities and equity$9,860,863
 $7,581,674

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
  Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income Retained Earnings 
Total Albemarle
Shareholders’ Equity
 Noncontrolling Interests Total Equity
Shares Amounts 
Balance at January 1, 2017 112,523,790
 $1,125
 $2,084,418
 $(412,412) $2,121,931
 $3,795,062
 $147,542
 $3,942,604
Net income         54,850
 54,850
 44,618
 99,468
Other comprehensive income       186,744
   186,744
 887
 187,631
Cash dividends declared, $1.28 per common share         (141,618) (141,618) (36,756) (178,374)
Stock-based compensation     16,505
     16,505
   16,505
Exercise of stock options 210,432
 2
 8,236
     8,238
   8,238
Shares repurchased (2,341,083) (23) (249,977)     (250,000)   (250,000)
Issuance of common stock, net 243,024
 2
 (2)     
   
Termination of Tianqi Lithium Corporation option agreement     13,144
     13,144
 (13,144) 
Shares withheld for withholding taxes associated with common stock issuances (89,489) (1) (8,375)     (8,376)   (8,376)
Balance at December 31, 2017 110,546,674
 $1,105
 $1,863,949
 $(225,668) $2,035,163
 $3,674,549
 $143,147
 $3,817,696
Balance at January 1, 2018 110,546,674
 $1,105
 $1,863,949
 $(225,668) $2,035,163
 $3,674,549
 $143,147
 $3,817,696
Net income         693,562
 693,562
 45,577
 739,139
Other comprehensive loss       (125,014)   (125,014) (181) (125,195)
Cash dividends declared, $1.34 per common share         (144,601) (144,601) (14,756) (159,357)
Cumulative adjustments from adoption of income tax standard updates         (18,074) (18,074)   (18,074)
Stock-based compensation     18,506
     18,506
   18,506
Exercise of stock options 94,031
 1
 3,632
     3,633
   3,633
Shares repurchased (5,262,654) (53) (499,947)   

 (500,000)   (500,000)
Issuance of common stock, net 383,974
 4
 (4)     
   
Shares withheld for withholding taxes associated with common stock issuances (145,997) (1) (17,239)     (17,240)   (17,240)
Balance at December 31, 2018 105,616,028
 $1,056
 $1,368,897
 $(350,682) $2,566,050
 $3,585,321
 $173,787
 $3,759,108
Balance at January 1, 2019 105,616,028
 $1,056
 $1,368,897
 $(350,682) $2,566,050
 $3,585,321
 $173,787
 $3,759,108
Net income         533,228
 533,228
 71,129
 604,357
Other comprehensive loss       (45,053)   (45,053) (467) (45,520)
Cash dividends declared, $1.47 per common share         (155,800) (155,800) (83,187) (238,987)
Stock-based compensation     21,284
     21,284
   21,284
Exercise of stock options 161,909
 2
 4,812
     4,814
   4,814
Issuance of common stock, net 396,269
 4
 (4)     
   
Increase in ownership interest of noncontrolling interest     (513)     (513) 68
 (445)
Shares withheld for withholding taxes associated with common stock issuances (133,991) (1) (11,030)     (11,031)   (11,031)
Balance at December 31, 2019 106,040,215
 $1,061
 $1,383,446
 $(395,735) $2,943,478
 $3,932,250
 $161,330
 $4,093,580
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 312019 2018 2017
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year$555,320
 $1,137,303
 $2,269,756
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income604,357
 739,139
 99,468
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization213,484
 200,698
 196,928
Gain on acquisition
 
 (6,221)
Gain on sale of business
 (210,428) 
Gain on sale of property(14,411) 
 
Stock-based compensation and other19,680
 15,228
 19,404
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax)(129,568) (89,264) (84,487)
Dividends received from unconsolidated investments and nonmarketable securities71,746
 57,415
 39,386
Pension and postretirement expense (benefit)31,515
 10,410
 (12,436)
Pension and postretirement contributions(16,478) (15,236) (13,341)
Unrealized gain on investments in marketable securities(2,809) (527) (3,135)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt4,829
 
 52,801
Deferred income taxes14,394
 49,164
 (41,941)
Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures:     
(Increase) in accounts receivable(18,220) (97,448) (74,545)
(Increase) in inventories(46,304) (124,067) (101,545)
(Increase) in other current assets(32,941) (2,181) (213)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable(12,234) 73,730
 53,421
(Decrease) in accrued expenses and income taxes payable(4,640) (1,999) (269,381)
Other, net36,974
 (58,469) 449,816
Net cash provided by operating activities719,374
 546,165
 303,979
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(820,000) (11,403) (44,367)
Capital expenditures(851,796) (699,991) (317,703)
Cash proceeds from divestitures, net
 413,569
 6,857
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment10,356
 
 
Sales of (investments in) marketable securities, net384
 (270) (275)
Repayments from joint ventures
 
 1,250
Investments in equity and other corporate investments(2,569) (5,600) (3,565)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,663,625) (303,695) (357,803)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from borrowings of other long-term debt1,597,807
 
 27,000
Repayments of long-term debt(175,215) 
 (778,209)
Other (repayments) borrowings, net(126,364) (113,567) 138,751
Fees related to early extinguishment of debt(4,419) 
 (46,959)
Dividends paid to shareholders(152,204) (144,596) (140,557)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests(83,187) (14,756) (36,756)
Repurchases of common stock
 (500,000) (250,000)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options4,814
 3,633
 8,238
Withholding taxes paid on stock-based compensation award distributions(11,031) (17,240) (8,376)
Debt financing costs(7,514) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,042,687
 (786,526) (1,086,868)
Net effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents(40,646) (37,927) 8,239
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents57,790
 (581,983) (1,132,453)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$613,110
 $555,320
 $1,137,303

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






NOTE 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operationsbalance sheets of Albemarle Corporation and our wholly owned, majority ownedits subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and controlled subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise indicates, the terms “Albemarle,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “the Company” mean Albemarle Corporation2020, and its consolidated subsidiaries. For entities that we control and are the primary beneficiary, but own less than 100%, we record the minority ownership as noncontrolling interest, except as noted below. We apply the equity method of accounting for investments in which we have an ownership interest from 20% to 50% or where we exercise significant influence over the related investee’s operations. All significant intercompany accountsconsolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity and transactions are eliminatedof cash flows for each of the three years in consolidation.
As described further in Note 2, “Acquisitions,” we completed the acquisition of a 60% ownership interest in Mineral Resources Limited’s (“MRL”) Wodgina hard rock lithium mine project (“Wodgina Project”) on Octoberperiod ended December 31, 2019 creating a joint venture named MARBL Lithium Joint Venture (“MARBL”2021, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). TheWe also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements contained herein include our proportionate sharereferred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the Wodgina Project, commencing on November 1, 2019. We are entitled to a pro rata portion of 60% of all minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) recovered from the tenements and produced by the joint venture. The joint venture is unincorporated with each investor holding an undivided interest in each asset and proportionately liable for each liability; therefore our proportionate share of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses are includedthree years in the appropriate classifications in the consolidated financial statements.
Estimates, Assumptions and Reclassifications
The preparation of financial statementsperiod ended December 31, 2021 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affectof America. Also in our opinion, the reported amountsCompany maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atDecember 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.COSO.
Revenue Recognition
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” and all related amendments using the modified retrospective method. There was no material impact to our results of operations or financial position upon adoption, and no adjustment was made to Retained earnings in our consolidated balance sheets because such adjustment was determined to be immaterial. In addition, new presentation requirements, including separate disclosure of net sales from sources other than customers on our consolidated statements of income and separate disclosures of contract assets or liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, generally did not have a material impact. However, business circumstances, including the nature of customer contracts, can change and as such, we have expanded processes and controls to recognize such changes, and as necessary, consider whether any of these currently immaterial items might differ in the future.
Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services, and is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied under the terms of contracts with our customers. A performance obligation is deemed to be satisfied when control of the product or service is transferred to our customer. The transaction price of a contract, or the amount we expect to receive upon satisfaction of all performance obligations, is determined by reference to the contract’s terms and includes adjustments, if applicable, for any variable consideration, such as customer rebates, noncash consideration or consideration payable to the customer, although these adjustments are generally not material. Where a contract contains more than one distinct performance obligation, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price of each performance obligation, although these situations do not occur frequently and are generally not built into our contracts. Any unsatisfied performance obligations are not material. Standalone selling prices are based on prices we charge to our customers, which in some cases is based on established market prices. Sales and other similar taxes collected from customers on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue. Our payment terms are generally between 30 to 90 days, however, they vary by market factors, such as customer size, creditworthiness, geography and competitive environment.
All of our revenue is derived from contracts with customers, and almost all of our contracts with customers contain one performance obligation for the transfer of goods where such performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time. Control of a product is deemed to be transferred to the customer upon shipment or delivery. Significant portions of our sales are sold free on board shipping point or on an equivalent basis, while delivery terms of other transactions are based upon specific contractual arrangements. Our standard terms of delivery are generally included in our contracts of sale, order confirmation documents and invoices, while the timing between shipment and delivery generally ranges between 1 and 45 days. Costs for shipping and
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





handling activities, whether performed before or after the customer obtains control of the goods, are accounted for as fulfillment costs.
The Company currently utilizes the following practical expedients, as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
All sales and other pass-through taxes are excluded from contract value;
In utilizing the modified retrospective transition method, no adjustment was necessary for contracts that did not cross over the reporting year;
We will not consider the possibility of a contract having a significant financing component (which would effectively attribute a portion of the sales price to interest income) unless, if at contract inception, the expected payment terms (from time of delivery or other relevant criterion) are more than one year;
If our right to customer payment is directly related to the value of our completed performance, we recognize revenue consistent with the invoicing right; and
We expense as incurred all costs of obtaining a contract incremental to any costs/compensation attributable to individual product sales/shipments for contracts where the amortization period for such costs would otherwise be one year or less.
58

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Certain products we produce are made to our customer’s specifications where such products have limitedno alternative use or would need significant rework costs in order to be sold to another customer. In management’s judgment, control of these arrangements is transferred to the customer at a point in time (upon shipment or delivery) and not over the time they are produced. Therefore revenue is recognized upon shipment or delivery of these products.
Costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers are not significant and are expensed immediately as the amortization period would be one year or less. When the Company incurs pre-production or other fulfillment costs in connection with an existing or specific anticipated contract and such costs are recoverable through margin or explicitly reimbursable, such costs are capitalized and amortized to Cost of goods sold on a systematic basis that is consistent with the pattern of transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates, which is less than one year. We record bad debt expense in specific situations when we determine the customer is unable to meet its financial obligation.
IncludedGoodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and other intangibles acquired in Trade accounts receivable ata business combination in conformity with current accounting guidance which requires goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets to not be amortized.
We test goodwill for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of our reporting units to the related carrying value. Our reporting units are either our operating business segments or one level below our operating business segments for which discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed by the business management. In applying the goodwill impairment test, we initially perform a qualitative test (“Step 0”), where we first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance of the reporting units and other entity and reporting unit specific events. If after assessing these qualitative factors, we determine it is “more-likely-than-not” that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we perform a quantitative test (“Step 1”). During Step 1, we estimate the fair value based on present value techniques involving future cash flows. Future cash flows for all reporting units include assumptions about revenue growth rates, adjusted EBITDA margins, discount rate as well as other economic or industry-related factors. For the Refining Solutions reporting unit, the revenue growth rates and adjusted EBITDA margins were deemed to be significant assumptions. Significant management judgment is involved in estimating these variables and they include inherent uncertainties since they are forecasting future events. We perform a sensitivity analysis by using a range of inputs to confirm the reasonableness of these estimates being used in the goodwill impairment analysis. We use a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) approach to determine our discount rate for goodwill recoverability testing. Our WACC calculation incorporates industry-weighted average returns on debt and equity from a market perspective. The factors in this calculation are largely external to Albemarle and, therefore, are beyond our control. We test our recorded goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year or upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying amounts. We performed our annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2021 and no evidence of impairment was noted from the analysis. As a result, we concluded there was no impairment as of that date.
We assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names and trademarks, for impairment annually and between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment standard allows us to first assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only required if we determine, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If we determine based on the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, an impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to its carrying amount. During the year ended December 31, 20192021, no evidence of impairment was noted from the analysis for our indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Definite-lived intangible assets, such as purchased technology, patents and 2018 is approximately $602.1 million and $590.3 million, respectively, arising from contracts with customers. The remaining balance of Trade accounts receivable at December 31, 2019 and 2018 primarily includes value-added taxes collected from customers on behalf of various taxing authorities.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market investments with insignificant interest rate risks and no limitations on access.
Inventories
Inventoriescustomer lists, are stated at lower of cost and net realizable value with cost determined primarily on the first-in, first-out basis. Cost is determined on the weighted-average basis for a small portion of our inventories at foreign plants and our stores, supplies and other inventory. A portion of our domestic produced finished goods and raw materials are determined on the last-in, first-out basis.

Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment include costs of assets constructed, purchased or leased under a finance lease, related delivery and installation costs and interest incurred on significant capital projects during their construction periods. Expenditures for renewals and betterments also are capitalized, but expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with yearly planned major maintenance are generally deferred and amortized over 12 months or until the same major maintenance activities must be repeated, whichever is shorter. The cost and accumulated depreciation applicable to assets retired or sold are removed from the respective accounts, and gains or losses thereon are included in income.
We assign the useful lives of our property, plant and equipment based upon our internal engineering estimates which are reviewed periodically. Thetheir estimated useful lives generally for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years. Except for customer lists and relationships associated with the majority of our property, plant and equipment range from two to sixty years and
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





depreciation is recorded onLithium business, which are amortized using the pattern of economic benefit method, definite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method, with the exception of our mineral rights and reserves, which are depleted on a units-of-production method.
We evaluate the recovery of our property, plant and equipmentdefinite-lived intangible assets by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized.
Leases
Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, “Leases” See Note 12, “Goodwill and all related amendments using the modified retrospective method. Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of additional net lease assets and lease liabilities of $139.1 million as of January 1, 2019. Comparative periods have not been restated and are reported in accordance with our historical accounting. The standard did not have an impact onOther Intangibles,” to our consolidated Net income or cash flows. In addition, as a result of the adoptionfinancial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this new standard, we have implemented internal controls and system changes to prepare the financial information.report.
As part of this adoption, we have elected the practical expedient relief package allowed by the new standard, which does not require the reassessment of (1) whether existing contracts contain a lease, (2) the lease classification or (3) unamortized initial direct costs for existing leases; and have elected to apply hindsight to the existing leases. Additionally, we have made accounting policy elections such as exclusion of short-term leases (leases with a term of 12 months or less and which do not include a purchase option that we are reasonably certain to exercise) from the balance sheet presentation, use of portfolio approach in determination of discount rate and accounting for non-lease components in a contract as part of a single lease component for all asset classes, except specific mining operation equipment.
We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As an implicit rate for most of our leases is not determinable, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The lease payments for the initial measurement of lease ROU assets and lease liabilities include fixed and variable payments based on an index or a rate. Variable lease payments that are not index or rate based are recorded as expenses when incurred. Our variable lease payments typically include real estate taxes, insurance costs and common-area maintenance. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made, net of lease incentives. The lease term is the non-cancelable period of the lease, including any options to extend, purchase or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. We amortize the operating lease ROU assets on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease and the finance lease ROU assets on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease terms. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet, and we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
59

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Resource Development Expenses
We incur costs in resource exploration, evaluation and development during the different phases of our resource development projects. Exploration costs incurred before obtaining legal rights to explore an areathe declaration of proven and probable resources are generally expensed as incurred. After obtaining legal rights, exploration costs are expensed in areas where we have uncertainty about obtaining proven resources. In areas where we have substantial knowledge about the area and consider it probable to obtain commercially viable proven resources, exploration and evaluation costs are capitalized.
If technical feasibility studies have been obtained, resource evaluation expenses are capitalized when the study demonstrates proven or probable resources for which future economic returns are expected, whiledeclared, exploration, evaluation and development costs for projects that are not considered viable are expensed. Development costs that are necessary to bring the property to commercial productioncapacity or increase the capacity or useful life are capitalized. CostsAny costs to maintain the production capacity in a property under production are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized resource costs are depleted using the units-of-production method. Our resource development assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Investments
Investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting if the investment gives us the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee. Significant influence is generally deemed to exist if we have an ownership interest in the voting stock of the investee between 20% and 50%, although other factors, such as representation on the investee’s board of directors and the impact of commercial arrangements, are considered in determining whether the equity method of accounting is appropriate. Under the equity method of accounting, we record our investments in equity-method investees in the consolidated balance sheets as Investments and our share of investees’ earnings or losses together with other-than-temporary impairments in value as Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments in the consolidated statements of income. We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may be impaired. If a decline in the value of an equity method investment is determined to be other than temporary, a loss is recorded in earnings in the current period.
Certain mutual fund investments are accounted for as trading equities and are marked-to-market on a periodic basis through the consolidated statements of income. Investments in joint ventures and nonmarketable securities of immaterial entities are estimated based upon the overall performance of the entity where financial results are not available on a timely basis.
Environmental Compliance and Remediation
Environmental compliance costs include the cost of purchasing and/or constructing assets to prevent, limit and/or control pollution or to monitor the environmental status at various locations. These costs are capitalized and depreciated based on estimated useful lives. Environmental compliance costs also include maintenance and operating costs with respect to pollution prevention and control facilities and other administrative costs. Such operating costs are expensed as incurred. Environmental remediation costs of facilities used in current operations are generally immaterial and are expensed as incurred. We accrue for environmental remediation costs and post-remediation costs that relate to existing conditions caused by past operations at facilities or off-plant disposal sites in the accounting period in which responsibility is established and when the related costs are estimable. In developing these cost estimates, we evaluate currently available facts regarding each site, with consideration given to existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations, prior experience in remediation of contaminated sites, the financial capability of other potentially responsible parties and other factors, subject to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process. If the amount and timing of the cash payments for a site are fixed or reliably determinable, the liability is discounted, if the calculated discount is material. Additionally, these estimates are reviewed periodically, with adjustments to the accruals recorded as necessary.
Research and Development Expenses
Our research and development expenses related to present and future products are expensed as incurred. These expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs and other overheads, as well as outside service and consulting costs incurred for specific programs. Our U.S. facilities in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas and Louisiana and our global facilities in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium and Korea form the capability base for our contract research and custom manufacturing businesses. These business areas provide research and scale-up services primarily to innovative life science companies.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and other intangibles acquired in a business combination in conformity with current accounting guidance that requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets not be amortized.
We test goodwill for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of our reporting units to the related carrying value. Our reporting units are either our operating business segments or one level below our operating business segments for which discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed by the business management. We estimate the fair value based on present value techniques involving future cash flows. Future cash flows include assumptions about sales volumes, selling prices, raw material prices, labor and other employee benefit costs, capital additions, income taxes, working capital, and other economic or market-related factors. Significant management judgment is involved in estimating these variables and they include inherent uncertainties since they are forecasting future events. We perform a sensitivity analysis by using a range of inputs to confirm the reasonableness of these estimates being used in the goodwill impairment analysis. We use a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) approach to determine our discount rate for goodwill recoverability testing. Our WACC calculation incorporates industry-weighted average returns on debt and equity from a market perspective. The factors in this calculation are largely external to the Company and, therefore, are beyond our control. We test our recorded goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year or upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





amounts. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2019 and concluded there was no impairment as of that date. In addition, no material indications of impairment in any of our reporting units were indicated by the sensitivity analysis.
We assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names and trademarks, for impairment annually and between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment standard allows us to first assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only required if we determine, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If we determine based on the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, an impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to its carrying amount.
Definite-lived intangible assets, such as purchased technology, patents and customer lists, are amortized over their estimated useful lives generally for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years. Except for customer lists and relationships associated with the majority of our Lithium business, which are amortized using the pattern of economic benefit method, definite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method. We evaluate the recovery of our definite-lived intangible assets by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. See Note 12, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles.”
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
Under authoritative accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets. As required, we recognize a balance sheet asset or liability for each of our pension and other postretirement benefit (“OPEB”)OPEB plans equal to the plan’s funded status as of the measurement date. The primary assumptions are as follows:
Discount Rate—The discount rate is used in calculating the present value of benefits, which is based on projections of benefit payments to be made in the future.
Expected Return on Plan Assets—We project the future return on plan assets based on prior performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plans as well as the expected long-term allocation of plan assets for these investments. These projected returns reduce the net benefit costs recorded currently.
Rate of Compensation Increase—For salary-related plans, we project employees’ annual pay increases, which are used to project employees’ pension benefits at retirement.
Mortality Assumptions—Assumptions about life expectancy of plan participants are used in the measurement of related plan obligations.
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized annually in our consolidated statements of income in the fourth quarter and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for a remeasurement during a fiscal year. The remaining components of pension and OPEB plan expense, primarily service cost, interest cost and expected return on assets, are recorded on a monthly basis. The market-related value of assets equals the actual market value as of the date of measurement.
During 2021, we made changes to assumptions related to discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets. We consider available information that we deem relevant when selecting each of these assumptions.
Our U.S. defined benefit plans for non-represented employees are closed to new participants, with no additional benefits accruing under these plans as participants’ accrued benefits have been frozen. In selecting the discount rates for the U.S. plans, we consider expected benefit payments on a plan-by-plan basis. As a result, the Company uses different discount rates for each plan depending on the demographics of participants and the expected timing of benefit payments. For 2021, the discount rates were calculated using the results from a bond matching technique developed by Milliman, which matched the future estimated annual benefit payments of each respective plan against a portfolio of bonds of high quality to determine the discount rate. We believe our selected discount rates are determined using preferred methodology under authoritative accounting guidance and accurately reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2021 measurement date.
In selecting the discount rates for the foreign plans, we look at long-term yields on AA-rated corporate bonds when available. Our actuaries have developed yield curves based on the yields of constituent bonds in the various indices as well as on other market indicators such as swap rates, particularly at the longer durations. For the Eurozone, we apply the Aon Hewitt yield curve to projected cash flows from the relevant plans to derive the discount rate. For the U.K., the discount rate is determined by applying the Aon Hewitt yield curve for typical schemes of similar duration to projected cash flows of Albemarle’s U.K. plan. In other countries where there is not a sufficiently deep market of high-quality corporate bonds, we set the discount rate by referencing the yield on government bonds of an appropriate duration.
At December 31, 2021, the weighted-average discount rate for the U.S. and foreign pension plans decreased to 2.86% and 1.44%, respectively, from 2.50% and 0.86%, respectively, at December 31, 2020 to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2021 measurement date. The discount rate for the OPEB plans at December 31, 2021 and 2020 was 2.85% and 2.49%, respectively.
In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we consider past performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plan as well as the expected long-term allocations of plan assets to these investments. For the years 2021 and 2020, the weighted-average expected rate of return on U.S. pension plan assets was 6.88%, and the weighted-average
60

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
expected rate of return on foreign pension plan assets was 3.98% and 4.07%, respectively. Effective January 1, 2022, the weighted-average expected rate of return on U.S. and foreign pension plan assets is 6.89% and 3.85%, respectively.
In projecting the rate of compensation increase, we consider past experience in light of movements in inflation rates. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the assumed weighted-average rate of compensation increase was 3.20% and 3.82%, respectively, for our foreign pension plans.

For the purpose of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December 31, 2021 and 2020, we used the Pri-2012 Mortality Tables along with the MP-2021 and MP-2020 Mortality Improvement Scale, respectively, published by the SOA.
At December 31, 2021, the assumed rate of increase in the pre-65 and post-65 per capita cost of covered health care benefits for U.S. retirees was zero as the employer-paid premium caps (pre-65 and post-65) were met starting January 1, 2013.
A variance in the assumptions discussed above would have an impact on the projected benefit obligations, the accrued OPEB liabilities, and the annual net periodic pension and OPEB cost. The following table reflects the sensitivities associated with a hypothetical change in certain assumptions, primarily in the U.S. (in thousands):
(Favorable) Unfavorable
1% Increase1% Decrease
Increase (Decrease)
in  Benefit Obligation
Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Cost
Increase (Decrease)
in  Benefit Obligation
Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Cost
Actuarial Assumptions
Discount Rate:
Pension$(104,285)$4,919 $120,116 $(6,514)
Other postretirement benefits$(4,520)$276 $5,414 $(348)
Expected return on plan assets:
Pension$(6,796)$6,796 
Other postretirement benefits$— $— 
* Not applicable.
Of the $700.2 million total pension and postretirement assets at December 31, 2021, $96.3 million, or approximately 14%, are measured using the net asset value as a practical expedient. Gains or losses attributable to these assets are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as either an increase or decrease in plan assets. See Note 15, “Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Income Taxes
We use the liability method for determining our income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. In order to record deferred tax assets and liabilities, we are following guidance under ASU 2015-17, which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet, along with any related valuation allowance. Tax effects are released from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income using either the specific identification approach or the portfolio approach based on the nature of the underlying item.
Deferred income taxes are provided for the estimated income tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also provided for operating losses, capital losses and certain tax credit carryovers. A valuation allowance, reducing deferred tax assets, is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of such deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character. Although realization is not assured, we do not establish a valuation allowance when we believe it is more likely than not that a net deferred tax asset will be realized.
We only recognize a tax benefit after concluding that it is more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained upon audit by the respective taxing authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. Once the recognition threshold is met, we recognize a tax benefit measured as the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in our judgment, is greater
61

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
than 50% likely to be realized. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in Income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Due to the statute of limitations, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax audits by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for years prior to 2017. Due to the statute of limitations, we also are no longer subject to U.S. state income tax audits prior to 2017.
With respect to jurisdictions outside the U.S., several audits are in process. We have audits ongoing for the years 2011 through 2020 related to Germany, Italy, Belgium, South Africa and Chile, some of which are for entities that have since been divested.
While we believe we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
Since the timing of resolutions and/or closure of tax audits are uncertain, it is difficult to predict with certainty the range of reasonably possible significant increases or decreases in the liability related to uncertain tax positions that may occur within the next twelve months. Our current view is that it is reasonably possible that we could record a decrease in the liability related to uncertain tax positions, relating to a number of issues, up to approximately $0.3 million as a result of closure of tax statutes. As a result of the sale of the Chemetall Surface Treatment business in 2016, we agreed to indemnify certain income and non-income tax liabilities, including uncertain tax positions, associated with the entities sold. The associated liability is recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities. See Note 16, “Other Noncurrent Liabilities,” and Note 21, “Income Taxes,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further details.
We have designated the undistributed earnings of a portion of our foreign operations as indefinitely reinvested and as a result we do not provide for deferred income taxes on the unremitted earnings of these subsidiaries. Our foreign earnings are computed under U.S. federal tax earnings and profits (“E&P”) principles. In general, to the extent our financial reporting book basis over tax basis of a foreign subsidiary exceeds these E&P amounts, deferred taxes have not been provided, as they are essentially permanent in duration. The determination of the amount of such unrecognized deferred tax liability is not practicable. We provide for deferred income taxes on our undistributed earnings of foreign operations that are not deemed to be indefinitely invested. We will continue to evaluate our permanent investment assertion taking into consideration all relevant and current tax laws.

Financial Condition and Liquidity
Overview
The principal uses of cash in our business generally have been capital investments and resource development costs, funding working capital, and service of debt. We also make contributions to our defined benefit pension plans, pay dividends to our shareholders and repurchase shares of our common stock. Historically, cash to fund the needs of our business has been principally provided by cash from operations, debt financing and equity issuances.
We are continually focused on working capital efficiency particularly in the areas of accounts receivable, payables and inventory. We anticipate that cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from divestitures and borrowings will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses, satisfy debt service obligations, fund capital expenditures and other investing activities, fund pension contributions and pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flow
Our cash and cash equivalents were $439.3 million at December 31, 2021 as compared to $746.7 million at December 31, 2020. Cash provided by operating activities was $344.3 million, $798.9 million and $719.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2021 versus 2020 was primarily due to the $332.5 million payment to Huntsman to settle a legacy Rockwood legal matter, lower earnings from the FCS business sold on June 1, 2021, as well as increased inventory balances and accounts receivable due to the timing of payments. This was partially offset by increased sales in our Lithium and Bromine segments. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2020 versus 2019 was primarily due to lower working capital outflow, including inventory reductions and the timing of receivable collections, as well as the previously announced Company-wide cost savings initiative and increased dividends from unconsolidated investments, which more than offset lower revenues in each of our reportable segments. The working capital
62

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
outflow in 2020 also included the payment of $61.5 million related to stamp duties in Australia levied on the assets purchased as part of the acquisition of the Wodgina Project completed in 2019.
During 2021, cash on hand, cash provided by operations, net cash proceeds of $289.8 million from the sale of the FCS business, $388.5 million of commercial paper borrowings and the $1.5 billion net proceeds from our underwritten public offering of common stock funded debt principal payments of approximately $1.5 billion, early extinguishment of debt fees of (24,877), $332.5 million of the legal settlement related to the legacy Rockwood business arbitration, $953.7 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $177.9 million, and pension and postretirement contributions of $30.3 million. During 2020, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and proceeds from borrowings of $200 million from one of our credit facilities funded $850.0 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $161.8 million, and pension and postretirement contributions of $16.4 million. In addition, during 2020 we received $11.0 million in proceeds from the sale of our ownership interest in the SOCC joint venture during and paid $22.6 million of agreed upon purchase price adjustments for the Wodgina Project acquisition. During 2019, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and proceeds from borrowings of $1.60 billion funded the Wodgina Project acquisition discussed below, $851.8 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $152.2 million, the repayment of $175.2 million of senior notes, and pension and postretirement contributions of $16.5 million. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, our consolidated joint venture, JBC, paid dividends of approximately $247.8 million, $63.7 million and $224.9 million, respectively, which resulted in dividends to noncontrolling interests of $96.1 million, $32.1 million and $83.2 million, respectively.
On June 1, 2021, we completed the sale of the FCS business to Grace for proceeds of approximately $570 million, consisting of $300 million in cash and the issuance to Albemarle of preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary having an aggregate stated value of $270 million. The preferred equity can be redeemed at Grace’s option under certain conditions and will accrue payment-in-kind dividends at an annual rate of 12% beginning on June 1, 2023, two years after issuance.
On February 8, 2021, we completed an underwritten public offering of 8,496,773 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $153.00 per share. We also granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 1,274,509 shares, which was exercised. The total gross proceeds from this offering were approximately $1.5 billion, before deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and commissions. In the first quarter of 2021, we made the following debt principal payments using the net proceeds from this underwritten public offering:
€123.8 million of the 1.125% notes due in November 2025
€393.0 million, the remaining balance, of the 1.875% Senior notes originally due in December 2021
$128.4 million of the 3.45% Senior notes due in November 2029
$200.0 million, the remaining balance, of the floating rate notes originally due in November 2022
€183.3 million, the outstanding balance, of the unsecured credit facility originally entered into on August 14, 2019, as amended and restated on December 15, 2020 (the “2019 Credit Facility”)
$325.0 million, the outstanding balance, of the commercial paper notes
On October 31, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in the Wodgina Project for a total purchase price of $1.3 billion. The purchase price is comprised of $820 million in cash and the transfer of 40% interest in certain lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built by Albemarle in Kemerton, Western Australia, valued at approximately $480 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we paid $22.6 million of agreed upon purchase price adjustments. The cash consideration was funded by the unsecured credit facility entered into on August 14, 2019.
In November 2019, we issued notes totaling $500.0 million and €1.0 billion. The net proceeds from the issuance of these notes were used to repay the $1.0 billion balance of the unsecured credit facility entered into on August 14, 2019, a large portion of approximately $370 million of commercial paper notes, the remaining balance of $175.2 million of the senior notes issued on December 10, 2010 (“2010 Senior Notes”), and for general corporate purposes. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million in Interest and financing expenses, representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of the 2010 Senior Notes.
Capital expenditures were $953.7 million, $850.5 million and $851.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and were incurred mainly for plant, machinery and equipment, and mining resource development.
63

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We expect our capital expenditures to be between $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion in 2022 primarily for Lithium growth and capacity increases, primarily in Australia, China and Silver Peak, Nevada, as well as productivity and continuity of operations projects in all segments. Train I of our Kemerton, Western Australia plant was completed in December 2021, but due to the ongoing labor shortages and COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions in Western Australia, Train II construction is now expected to be completed in the second half of 2022. Commercial sales volume from Train I will begin in 2022 and Train II in 2023.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we incurred $12.7 million, $17.3 million and $20.7 million of costs related to the acquisition, integration and potential divestitures for various significant projects, including the acquisition of the Wodgina Project in 2019, which primarily consisted of professional services and advisory fees.
The Company is permitted to repurchase up to a maximum of 15,000,000 shares under a share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors. There were no shares of our common stock repurchased during 2021, 2020 or 2019. At December 31, 2021, there were 7,396,263 remaining shares available for repurchase under the Company’s authorized share repurchase program.
Net current assets decreased to approximately $133.6 million at December 31, 2021 from $404.3 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents to pay a portion of the legacy Rockwood legal matter and for capital expenditures, as well as the increase in accrued expenses for the remaining payment of the legacy Rockwood legal matter. This was partially offset by the repayment of the current portion of long-term debt using proceeds from our underwritten public offering of our common stock. Additional changes in the components of net current assets are primarily due to the timing of the sale of goods and other ordinary transactions leading up to the balance sheet dates and are not the result of any policy changes by the Company, and do not reflect any change in either the quality of our net current assets or our expectation of success in converting net working capital to cash in the ordinary course of business.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, our cash and cash equivalents included $374.0 million and $492.8 million, respectively, held by our foreign subsidiaries. The majority of these foreign cash balances are associated with earnings that we have asserted are indefinitely reinvested and which we plan to use to support our continued growth plans outside the U.S. through funding of capital expenditures, acquisitions, research, operating expenses or other similar cash needs of our foreign operations. From time to time, we repatriate cash associated with earnings from our foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. for normal operating needs through intercompany dividends, but only from subsidiaries whose earnings we have not asserted to be indefinitely reinvested or whose earnings qualify as “previously taxed income” as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we repatriated approximately $0.9 million, $1.8 million and $351.9 million of cash, respectively, as part of these foreign earnings cash repatriation activities.
While we continue to closely monitor our cash generation, working capital management and capital spending in light of continuing uncertainties in the global economy, we believe that we will continue to have the financial flexibility and capability to opportunistically fund future growth initiatives. Additionally, we anticipate that future capital spending, including business acquisitions, share repurchases and other cash outlays, should be financed primarily with cash flow provided by operations and cash on hand, with additional cash needed, if any, provided by borrowings. The amount and timing of any additional borrowings will depend on our specific cash requirements.
Long-Term Debt
We currently have the following notes outstanding:
Issue Month/YearPrincipal (in millions)Interest RateInterest Payment DatesMaturity Date
November 2019€371.71.125%November 25November 25, 2025
November 2019€500.01.625%November 25November 25, 2028
November 2019(a)
$171.63.45% May 15 and November 15November 15, 2029
November 2014(a)
$425.04.15%June 1 and December 1December 1, 2024
November 2014(a)
$350.05.45%June 1 and December 1December 1, 2044

(a)    Denotes senior notes.
Our senior notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all our other senior unsecured indebtedness from time to time outstanding. The notes are effectively subordinated to all of our existing or future secured indebtedness and to the existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries. As is customary for such long-term debt instruments, each series of notes
64

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
outstanding has terms that allow us to redeem the notes before maturity, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of these notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of redemption) discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis using the comparable government rate (as defined in the indentures governing these notes) plus between 25 and 40 basis points, depending on the series of notes, plus, in each case, accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption. Holders may require us to purchase such notes at 101% upon a change of control triggering event, as defined in the indentures. These notes are subject to typical events of default, including bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment and the acceleration of certain subsidiary indebtedness of $40 million or more caused by a nonpayment default.
Our Euro notes issued in 2019 are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment to all our other unsecured senior obligations. The Euro notes are effectively subordinated to all of our existing or future secured indebtedness and to the existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries. As is customary for such long-term debt instruments, each series of notes outstanding has terms that allow us to redeem the notes before their maturity, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal thereof and interest thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to, but excluding, the date of redemption) discounted to the redemption date on an annual basis using the bond rate (as defined in the indentures governing these notes) plus between 25 and 35 basis points, depending on the series of notes, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption. Holders may require us to purchase such notes at 101% upon a change of control triggering event, as defined in the indentures. These notes are subject to typical events of default, including bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment and the acceleration of certain subsidiary indebtedness exceeding $100 million caused by a nonpayment default.
Our revolving, unsecured credit agreement dated as of June 21, 2018, as amended on August 14, 2019 and further amended on May 11, 2020 (the “2018 Credit Agreement”) currently provides for borrowings of up to $1.0 billion and matures on August 9, 2024. Borrowings under the 2018 Credit Agreement bear interest at variable rates based on an average LIBOR for deposits in the relevant currency plus an applicable margin which ranges from 0.910% to 1.500%, depending on the Company’s credit rating from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services LLC (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”). The applicable margin on the facility was 1.125% as of December 31, 2021. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2018 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2021.
On August 14, 2019, the Company entered into the $1.2 billion 2019 Credit Facility with several banks and other financial institutions, which was amended and restated on December 15, 2020 and again on December 10, 2021. The lenders’ commitment to provide new loans under the amended 2019 Credit Facility permits up to four borrowings by the Company in an aggregate amount equal to $750 million. The 2019 Credit Facility terminates on December 9, 2022, with each such loan maturing 364 days after the funding of such loan. The Company can request that the maturity date of loans be extended for a period of up to four additional years, but any such extension is subject to the approval of the lenders. At the option of the Company, the borrowings under the 2019 Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates based on either the base rate or LIBOR for deposits in U.S. dollars, in each case plus an applicable margin which ranges from 0.000% to 0.375% for base rate borrowings or 0.875% to 1.375% for LIBOR borrowings, depending on the Company’s credit rating from S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. The applicable margin on the 2019 Credit Facility was 1.125% as of December 31, 2021. There were no borrowings outstanding under the 2019 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2021.
Borrowings under the under the 2019 Credit Facility and 2018 Credit Agreement (together the “Credit Agreements”) are conditioned upon satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the absence of defaults. The Company is subject to one financial covenant, as well as customary affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenant requires that the Company’s consolidated net funded debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio (as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreements) be less than or equal to 4.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021 and 3.50:1 for fiscal quarters thereafter, subject to adjustments in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreements relating to a consummation of an acquisition where the consideration includes cash proceeds from issuance of funded debt in excess of $500 million. The Credit Agreements also contain customary default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants and cross-defaults to other material indebtedness. The occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreements could result in all loans and other obligations becoming immediately due and payable and each such Credit Agreement being terminated. Certain representations, warranties and covenants under the 2018 Credit Agreement were conformed to those under the 2019 Credit Facility following the amendments to those agreements.
On May 29, 2013, we entered into agreements to initiate a commercial paper program on a private placement basis under which we may issue unsecured commercial paper notes (the “Commercial Paper Notes”) from time-to-time up to a maximum
65

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time of $750.0 million. The proceeds from the issuance of the Commercial Paper Notes are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of other debt of the Company. The Credit Agreements are available to repay the Commercial Paper Notes, if necessary. Aggregate borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreements and the Commercial Paper Notes will not exceed the $1.75 billion current maximum amount available under the Credit Agreements. The Commercial Paper Notes will be sold at a discount from par, or alternatively, will be sold at par and bear interest at rates that will vary based upon market conditions at the time of issuance. The maturities of the Commercial Paper Notes will vary but may not exceed 397 days from the date of issue. The definitive documents relating to the commercial paper program contain customary representations, warranties, default and indemnification provisions. At December 31, 2021, we had $388.5 million of Commercial Paper Notes outstanding bearing a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 0.46% and a weighted-average maturity of 20 days. The Commercial Paper Notes are classified as Current portion of long-term debt in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The non-current portion of our long-term debt amounted to $2.00 billion at December 31, 2021, compared to $2.77 billion at December 31, 2020. In addition, at December 31, 2021, we had the ability to borrow $1.36 billion under our commercial paper program and the Credit Agreements, and $210.6 million under other existing lines of credit, subject to various financial covenants under our Credit Agreements. We have the ability and intent to refinance our borrowings under our other existing credit lines with borrowings under the Credit Agreements, as applicable. Therefore, the amounts outstanding under those credit lines, if any, are classified as long-term debt. We believe that as of December 31, 2021 we were, and currently are, in compliance with all of our debt covenants. For additional information about our long-term debt obligations, see Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and others, we have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, including bank guarantees and letters of credit, which totaled approximately $81.2 million at December 31, 2021. None of these off-balance sheet arrangements has, or is likely to have, a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
Liquidity Outlook
We anticipate that cash on hand and cash provided by operating activities, divestitures and borrowings will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses, satisfy debt service obligations, fund any capital expenditures and share repurchases, make acquisitions, make pension contributions and pay dividends for the foreseeable future. Our main focus during the continued uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic is to continue to maintain financial flexibility by continuing our cost savings initiative, while still protecting our employees and customers, committing to shareholder returns and maintaining an investment grade rating. Over the next three years, in terms of uses of cash, we will continue to invest in growth of the businesses and return value to shareholders. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate the merits of any opportunities that may arise for acquisitions of businesses or assets, which may require additional liquidity.
Our growth investments include the recently announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity of Tianyuan for approximately $200 million in cash. Tianyuan's operations include a recently constructed lithium processing plant that has designed annual conversion capacity of up to 25,000 metric tons of LCE and is capable of producing battery-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide. We expect the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, to close in the first half of 2022. In addition, we announced agreements for strategic investments in China with plans to build two lithium hydroxide conversion plants, each initially targeting 50,000 metric tons per year. We expect construction of these conversion plants to begin in 2022 and be completed by the end of 2024.
Overall, with generally strong cash-generative businesses and no significant long-term debt maturities before November 2024, we believe we have, and will be able to maintain, a solid liquidity position. Our annual maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in millions): 2022—$389.9; 2023—$0.0; 2024—$425.0; 2025—$426.6; 2026—$0.0; thereafter—$1,166.4. Obligations in 2022 primarily include our outstanding Commercial Paper Notes of $388.5 million with a weighted average maturity of 20 days. In addition, we expect to make interest payments on those long-term debt obligations as follows (in millions): 2022—$58.5; 2023—$56.6; 2024—$55.1; 2025—$38.5; 2026—$34.1; thereafter—$378.1. For variable-rate debt obligations, projected interest payments are calculated using the December 31, 2021 weighted average interest rate of approximately 0.40%.
In addition, we expect our capital expenditures to be between $1.3 billion and $1.5 billion in 2022, primarily for Lithium growth and capacity increases, primarily in Australia, China and Silver Peak, Nevada, as well as productivity and continuity of operations projects in all segments. Train I of our Kemerton, Western Australia plant was completed in December 2021, but due to the ongoing labor shortages and COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions in Western Australia, Train II construction is now
66

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
expected to be completed in the second half of 2022. Commercial sales volume from Train I will begin in 2022 and Train II in 2023. As of December 31, 2021, we have also committed to approximately $99.4 million of payments to third-party vendors in the normal course of business to secure raw materials for our production processes, with approximately $78.3 million to be paid in 2022. In order to secure materials, sometimes for long durations, these contracts mandate a minimum amount of product to be purchased at predetermined rates over a set timeframe.
See Note 18, “Leases,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for our annual expected payments under our operating lease obligations at December 31, 2021.
In 2022, we expect to pay $23.8 million of the $258.0 million balance remaining from the transition tax on foreign earnings as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) signed into law in December 2017. The one-time transition tax imposed by the TCJA is based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits that we previously deferred from U.S. income taxes and is payable over an eight-year period, with the final payment made in 2026.
Contributions to our domestic and foreign qualified and nonqualified pension plans, including our supplemental executive retirement plan, are expected to approximate $12 million in 2022. We may choose to make additional pension contributions in excess of this amount. We made contributions of approximately $27.6 million to our domestic and foreign pension plans (both qualified and nonqualified) during the year ended December 31, 2021.
The liability related to uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities totaled $27.7 million and $14.7 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Related assets for corresponding offsetting benefits recorded in Other assets totaled $32.9 million and $24.1 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We cannot estimate the amounts of any cash payments during the next twelve months associated with these liabilities and are unable to estimate the timing of any such cash payments in the future at this time.
Our cash flows from operations may be negatively affected by adverse consequences to our customers and the markets in which we compete as a result of moderating global economic conditions and reduced capital availability. The COVID-19 pandemic has not had a material impact on our liquidity to date; however, we cannot predict the overall impact in terms of cash flow generation as that will depend on the length and severity of the outbreak. As a result, we are planning for various economic scenarios and actively monitoring our balance sheet to maintain the financial flexibility needed.
Although we maintain business relationships with a diverse group of financial institutions as sources of financing, an adverse change in their credit standing could lead them to not honor their contractual credit commitments to us, decline funding under our existing but uncommitted lines of credit with them, not renew their extensions of credit or not provide new financing to us. While the global corporate bond and bank loan markets remain strong, periods of elevated uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic or global economic and/or geopolitical concerns may limit efficient access to such markets for extended periods of time. If such concerns heighten, we may incur increased borrowing costs and reduced credit capacity as our various credit facilities mature. If the U.S. Federal Reserve or similar national reserve banks in other countries decide to tighten the monetary supply in response, for example, to improving economic conditions, we may incur increased borrowing costs (as interest rates increase on our variable rate credit facilities, as our various credit facilities mature or as we refinance any maturing fixed rate debt obligations), although these cost increases would be partially offset by increased income rates on portions of our cash deposits.
On February 6, 2017, Huntsman, a subsidiary of Huntsman Corporation, filed a lawsuit in New York state court against Rockwood, Rockwood Specialties, Inc., certain former executives of Rockwood and its subsidiaries—Seifollah Ghasemi, Thomas Riordan, Andrew Ross, and Michael Valente, and Albemarle. The lawsuit arises out of Huntsman’s acquisition of certain Rockwood subsidiaries in connection with a stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”), dated September 17, 2013. Before that transaction closed on October 1, 2014, Albemarle began discussions with Rockwood to purchase all outstanding equity of Rockwood and did so in a transaction that closed on January 12, 2015. Huntsman’s complaint asserted that certain technology that Rockwood had developed for a production facility in Augusta, Georgia, and which was among the assets that Huntsman acquired pursuant to the SPA, did not work, and that Rockwood and the defendant executives had intentionally misled Huntsman about that technology in connection with the Huntsman-Rockwood transaction. The complaint asserted claims for, among other things, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the SPA, and sought certain costs for completing construction of the production facility.
On March 10, 2017, Albemarle moved in New York state court to compel arbitration, which was granted on January 8, 2018 (although Huntsman unsuccessfully appealed that decision). Huntsman’s arbitration demand asserted claims substantially similar to those asserted in its state court complaint, and sought various forms of legal remedies, including cost overruns, compensatory damages, expectation damages, punitive damages, and restitution. After a trial, the arbitration panel issued an
67

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
award on October 28, 2021, awarding approximately $600 million (including interest) to be paid by Albemarle to Huntsman, in addition to the possibility of attorney’s fees, costs and expenses. Following the arbitration panel decision, Albemarle reached a settlement with Huntsman to pay $665 million in two equal installments, with the first payment made in December 2021. As a result, the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2021, includes expense of $657.4 million ($508.5 million net of income tax), inclusive of legal fees incurred by Huntsman and other related obligations, to reflect the agreed upon resolution of this legal matter.
In addition, as first reported in 2018, following receipt of information regarding potential improper payments being made by third-party sales representatives of our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, we promptly retained outside counsel and forensic accountants to investigate potential violations of the Company’s Code of Conduct, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other potentially applicable laws. Based on this internal investigation, we have voluntarily self-reported potential issues relating to the use of third-party sales representatives in our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, to the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP, and are cooperating with the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP in their review of these matters. In connection with our internal investigation, we have implemented, and are continuing to implement, appropriate remedial measures. We have commenced discussions with the SEC about a potential resolution.
At this time, we are unable to predict the duration, scope, result, or related costs associated with the investigations. We also are unable to predict what action may be taken by the DOJ, the SEC, or the DPP, or what penalties or remedial actions they may ultimately seek. Any determination that our operations or activities are not, or were not, in compliance with existing laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses. We do not believe, however, that any such fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or liquidity. However, an adverse resolution could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a particular period.
We had cash and cash equivalents totaling $439.3 million as of December 31, 2021, of which $374.0 million is held by our foreign subsidiaries. This cash represents an important source of our liquidity and is invested in bank accounts or money market investments with no limitations on access. The cash held by our foreign subsidiaries is intended for use outside of the U.S. We anticipate that any needs for liquidity within the U.S. in excess of our cash held in the U.S. can be readily satisfied with borrowings under our existing U.S. credit facilities or our commercial paper program.
Guarantor Financial Information
Albemarle Wodgina Pty Ltd Issued Notes
Albemarle Wodgina Pty Ltd (the “Issuer”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Albemarle Corporation, issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2029 (the “3.45% Senior Notes”) in November 2019. The 3.45% Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (the “Guarantee”) on a senior unsecured basis by Albemarle Corporation (the “Parent Guarantor”). No direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Parent Guarantor guarantee the 3.45% Senior Notes (such subsidiaries are referred to as the “Non-Guarantors”).
In 2019, we completed the acquisition of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project in Western Australia and formed an unincorporated joint venture with MRL, MARBL, for the exploration, development, mining, processing and production of lithium and other minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) from the Wodgina spodumene mine and for the operation of the Kemerton assets in Western Australia. We participate in the Wodgina Project through our ownership interest in the Issuer.
The Parent Guarantor conducts its U.S. Bromine and Catalysts operations directly, and conducts its other operations (other than operations conducted through the Issuer) through the Non-Guarantors.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are the Issuer’s senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment to the senior indebtedness of the Issuer, effectively subordinated to all of the secured indebtedness of the Issuer, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness, and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of its subsidiaries. The Guarantee is the senior unsecured obligation of the Parent Guarantor and ranks equally in right of payment to the senior indebtedness of the Parent Guarantor, effectively subordinated to the secured debt of the Parent Guarantor to the extent of the value of the assets securing the indebtedness and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of its subsidiaries.
For cash management purposes, the Parent Guarantor transfers cash among itself, the Issuer and the Non-Guarantors through intercompany financing arrangements, contributions or declaration of dividends between the respective parent and its subsidiaries. The transfer of cash under these activities facilitates the ability of the recipient to make specified third-party payments for principal and interest on the Issuer and/or the Parent Guarantor’s outstanding debt, common stock dividends and
68

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
common stock repurchases. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Issuer or the Parent Guarantor to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Parent Guarantor and the Issuer on a combined basis after elimination of (i) intercompany transactions and balances among the Issuer and the Parent Guarantor and (ii) equity in earnings from and investments in any subsidiary that is a Non-Guarantor. Each entity in the combined financial information follows the same accounting policies as described herein.
Summarized Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Net sales(a)
$1,412,913 
Gross profit241,739 
Loss before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments(b)(c)
(607,995)
Net loss attributable to the Guarantor and the Issuer(c)
(558,342)
(a)    Includes net sales to Non-Guarantors of $715.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes intergroup expenses to Non-Guarantors of $114.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes Parent Guarantor’s portion of the gain on sale of the FCS business on June 1, 2021 and the loss for the legacy Rockwood legal matter. In addition, includes Issuer’s loss related to anticipated cost overruns for MRL’s 40% interest in lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton.
Summarized Balance Sheet
At December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Current assets(a)
$961,003 
Net property, plant and equipment2,979,034 
Other non-current assets534,695 
Current liabilities(b)
$2,329,212 
Long-term debt1,002,009 
Other non-current liabilities(c)
7,008,857 
(a)    Includes receivables from Non-Guarantors of $466.6 million at December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes current payables to Non-Guarantors of $1,105.2 million at December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes non-current payables to Non-Guarantors of $6.5 billion at December 31, 2021.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Non-Guarantors. The Non-Guarantors are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to the 3.45% Senior Notes or the Indenture under which the 3.45% Senior Notes were issued, or to make any funds available therefor, whether by dividends, loans, distributions or other payments. Any right that the Parent Guarantor has to receive any assets of any of the Non-Guarantors upon the liquidation or reorganization of any Non-Guarantor, and the consequent rights of holders of the 3.45% Senior Notes to realize proceeds from the sale of any of a Non-Guarantor’s assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of such Non-Guarantor’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of preferred equity interests, if any, of such Non-Guarantor. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of the Non-Guarantors, the Non-Guarantors will pay the holders of their debts, holders of preferred equity interests, if any, and their trade creditors before they will be able to distribute any of their assets to the Parent Guarantor.
The 3.45% Senior Notes are obligations of the Issuer. The Issuer’s cash flow and ability to make payments on the 3.45% Senior Notes could be dependent upon the earnings it derives from the production from MARBL for the Wodgina Project. Absent income received from sales of its share of production from MARBL, the Issuer’s ability to service the 3.45% Senior Notes could be dependent upon the earnings of the Parent Guarantor’s subsidiaries and other joint ventures and the payment of those earnings to the Issuer in the form of equity, loans or advances and through repayment of loans or advances from the Issuer.

69

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
The Issuer’s obligations in respect of MARBL are guaranteed by the Parent Guarantor. Further, under MARBL pursuant to a deed of cross security between the Issuer, the joint venture partner and the manager of the project (the “Manager”), each of the Issuer, and the joint venture partner have granted security to each other and the Manager for the obligations each of the Issuer and the joint venture partner have to each other and to the Manager. The claims of the joint venture partner, the Manager and other secured creditors of the Issuer will have priority as to the assets of the Issuer over the claims of holders of the 3.45% Senior Notes.
Albemarle Corporation Issued Notes
In March 2021, Albemarle New Holding GmbH (the “Subsidiary Guarantor”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Albemarle Corporation, added a full and unconditional guarantee (the “Upstream Guarantee”) to all securities issued and outstanding by Albemarle Corporation (the “Parent Issuer”) and issuable by the Parent Issuer pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of January 20, 2005, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the “Indenture”). No other direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Parent Issuer guarantee these securities (such subsidiaries are referred to as the “Upstream Non-Guarantors”). See Long-term debt section above for a description of the securities issued by the Parent Issuer.
The current securities outstanding under the Indenture are the Parent Issuer’s unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. With respect to any series of securities issued under the Indenture, the Upstream Guarantee is, and will be, an unsecured and unsubordinated obligation of the Subsidiary Guarantor, ranking pari passu with all other existing and future unsubordinated and unsecured indebtedness of the Subsidiary Guarantor.
For cash management purposes, the Parent Issuer transfers cash among itself, the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Upstream Non-Guarantors through intercompany financing arrangements, contributions or declaration of dividends between the respective parent and its subsidiaries. The transfer of cash under these activities facilitates the ability of the recipient to make specified third-party payments for principal and interest on the Parent Issuer and/or the Subsidiary Guarantor’s outstanding debt, common stock dividends and common stock repurchases. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Parent Issuer or the Subsidiary Guarantor to obtain funds from subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
The following tables present summarized financial information for the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Parent Issuer on a combined basis after elimination of (i) intercompany transactions and balances among the Parent Issuer and the Subsidiary Guarantor and (ii) equity in earnings from and investments in any subsidiary that is an Upstream Non-Guarantor.
Summarized Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Net sales(a)
$1,412,913 
Gross profit259,314 
Loss before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments(b)(c)
(368,737)
Net loss attributable to the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Parent Issuer(c)
(320,726)
(a)    Includes net sales to Non-Guarantors of $715.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes intergroup expenses to Non-Guarantors of $17.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes the Parent Issuer’s portion of the gain on sale of the FCS business on June 1, 2021 and the loss for the legacy Rockwood legal matter.
70

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Summarized Balance Sheet
At December 31,
$ in thousands2021
Current assets(a)
$1,039,391 
Net property, plant and equipment754,818 
Other non-current assets(b)
1,634,883 
Current liabilities(c)
$2,174,360 
Long-term debt1,755,026 
Other non-current liabilities(d)
6,404,958 
(a)    Includes current receivables from Non-Guarantors of $576.1 million at December 31, 2021.
(b)    Includes noncurrent receivables from Non-Guarantors of $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021.
(c)    Includes current payables to Non-Guarantors of $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021.
(d)    Includes non-current payables to Non-Guarantors of $5.8 billion at December 31, 2021.
These securities are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Upstream Non-Guarantors. The Upstream Non-Guarantors are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any amounts due pursuant to these securities or the Indenture under which these securities were issued, or to make any funds available therefor, whether by dividends, loans, distributions or other payments. Any right that the Subsidiary Guarantor has to receive any assets of any of the Upstream Non-Guarantors upon the liquidation or reorganization of any Upstream Non-Guarantors, and the consequent rights of holders of these securities to realize proceeds from the sale of any of an Upstream Non-Guarantor’s assets, would be effectively subordinated to the claims of such Upstream Non-Guarantor’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of preferred equity interests, if any, of such Upstream Non-Guarantor. Accordingly, in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of the Upstream Non-Guarantors, the Upstream Non-Guarantors will pay the holders of their debts, holders of preferred equity interests, if any, and their trade creditors before they will be able to distribute any of their assets to the Subsidiary Guarantor.

Safety and Environmental Matters
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign requirements regulating the handling, manufacture and use of materials (some of which may be classified as hazardous or toxic by one or more regulatory agencies), the discharge of materials into the environment and the protection of the environment. To our knowledge, we are currently complying and expect to continue to comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws, regulations, statutes and ordinances. Compliance with existing federal, state, local and foreign environmental protection laws is not expected to have a material effect on capital expenditures, earnings or our competitive position, but the costs associated with increased legal or regulatory requirements could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
Among other environmental requirements, we are subject to the federal Superfund law, and similar state laws, under which we may be designated as a PRP, and may be liable for a share of the costs associated with cleaning up various hazardous waste sites. Management believes that in cases in which we may have liability as a PRP, our liability for our share of cleanup is de minimis. Further, almost all such sites represent environmental issues that are quite mature and have been investigated, studied and in many cases settled. In de minimis situations, our policy generally is to negotiate a consent decree and to pay any apportioned settlement, enabling us to be effectively relieved of any further liability as a PRP, except for remote contingencies. In other than de minimis PRP matters, our records indicate that unresolved PRP exposures should be immaterial. We accrue and expense our proportionate share of PRP costs. Because management has been actively involved in evaluating environmental matters, we are able to conclude that the outstanding environmental liabilities for unresolved PRP sites should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations or financial condition.
Our environmental and safety operating costs charged to expense were $43.2 million, $44.9 million and $48.0 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, excluding depreciation of previous capital expenditures, and are expected to be in the same range in the next few years. Costs for remediation have been accrued and payments related to sites are charged against accrued liabilities, which at December 31, 2021 totaled approximately $46.6 million, an increase of $0.8 million from $45.8 million at December 31, 2020. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a reconciliation of our environmental liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
71

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
We believe that any sum we may be required to pay in connection with environmental remediation and asset retirement obligation matters in excess of the amounts recorded should occur over a period of time and should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows on a consolidated annual basis, although any such sum could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows in a particular quarterly reporting period.
Capital expenditures for pollution-abatement and safety projects, including such costs that are included in other projects, were approximately $55.4 million, $40.4 million and $44.4 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In the future, capital expenditures for these types of projects may increase due to more stringent environmental regulatory requirements and our efforts in reaching sustainability goals. Management’s estimates of the effects of compliance with governmental pollution-abatement and safety regulations are subject to (a) the possibility of changes in the applicable statutes and regulations or in judicial or administrative construction of such statutes and regulations and (b) uncertainty as to whether anticipated solutions to pollution problems will be successful, or whether additional expenditures may prove necessary.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a discussion of our Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The primary currencies to which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure are the Euro, Japanese Yen, Chinese Renminbi, Australian Dollar and Chilean Peso. In response to greater fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in recent periods, we have increased the degree of exposure risk management activities to minimize the potential impact on earnings.
We manage our foreign currency exposures by balancing certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and through the use, from time to time, of foreign currency forward contracts. The principal objective of such contracts is to minimize the financial impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The counterparties to these contractual agreements are major financial institutions with which we generally have other financial relationships. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties. We do not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
The primary method we use to reduce foreign currency exposure is to identify natural hedges, in which the operating activities denominated in respective currencies across various subsidiaries balance in respect to timing and the underlying exposures. In the event a natural hedge is not available, we may employ a forward contract to reduce exposure, generally expiring within one year. While these contracts are subject to fluctuations in value, such fluctuations are intended to offset the changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we entered into a foreign currency forward contract to hedge the cash flow exposure of non-functional currency purchases during the construction of the Kemerton plant in Australia. This contract has been designated as an effective hedging instrument, and beginning the date of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of this contract to our reporting currency have been and will be recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. All other gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts not designated as an effective hedging instrument are recognized in Other expenses, net, and generally do not have a significant impact on results of operations.
At December 31, 2021, our financial instruments subject to foreign currency exchange risk consisted of foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate notional value of $654.6 million and with a fair value representing a net asset position of $2.8 million. Fluctuations in the value of these contracts are intended to offset the changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the fair value of our foreign currency hedge portfolio assuming an instantaneous 10% change in select foreign currency exchange rates from their levels as of December 31, 2021, with all other variables held constant. A 10% appreciation of the U.S. Dollar against foreign currencies that we hedge would result in a decrease of approximately $33.6 million in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. A 10% depreciation of the U.S. Dollar against these foreign currencies would result in an increase of approximately $38.0 million in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. The sensitivity of the fair value of our foreign currency hedge portfolio represents changes in fair values estimated based on market conditions as of December 31, 2021, without reflecting the effects of underlying anticipated transactions. When those anticipated transactions are realized, actual effects of changing foreign currency exchange rates could have a material impact on our earnings and cash flows in future periods.
On December 18, 2014, the carrying value of our 1.875% Euro-denominated senior notes was designated as an effective hedge of our net investment in foreign subsidiaries where the Euro serves as the functional currency, and beginning on the date
72

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of these senior notes to our reporting currency have been were recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. In the first quarter of 2021, we repaid the outstanding balance of these senior notes, and as a result, this net investment hedge was discontinued. The balance of foreign exchange revaluation gains and losses associated with this discontinued net investment hedge will remain within accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged net investment is sold or liquidated.
We are exposed to changes in interest rates that could impact our results of operations and financial condition. We manage global interest rate and foreign exchange exposure as part of our regular operational and financing strategies. We had variable interest rate borrowings of $393.7 million and $756.6 million outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These borrowings represented 16% and 21% of total outstanding debt and bore average interest rates of 0.40% and 0.87% at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the average interest rate applicable to these borrowings would change our annualized interest expense by approximately $3.9 million as of December 31, 2021. We may enter into interest rate swaps, collars or similar instruments with the objective of reducing interest rate volatility relating to our borrowing costs.
Our raw materials are subject to price volatility caused by weather, supply conditions, political and economic variables and other unpredictable factors. Historically, we have not used futures, options or swap contracts to manage the volatility related to the above exposures. However, the refinery catalysts business has used financing arrangements to provide long-term protection against changes in metals prices. We seek to limit our exposure by entering into long-term contracts when available, and we seek price increase limitations through contracts. These contracts do not have a significant impact on our results of operations.

73

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with management’s and our directors’ authorizations; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework2013 set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The concept of reasonable assurance is based on the recognition that there are inherent limitations in all systems of internal control. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
/S/ J. KENT MASTERS
J. Kent Masters
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
February 18, 2022

74

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Albemarle Corporation

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Albemarle Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidatedfinancial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
75

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment – Refining Solutions Reporting Unit
As described in Notes 1 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill balance was $1,598 million as of December 31, 2021, and the goodwill associated with the Refining Solutions reporting unit was $176 million. Management conducts an impairment test as of October 31 of each year, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may be impaired. Potential impairment is identified by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to it’s carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value is estimated by management using present value techniques involving future cash flows. Management’s cash flow projections for the Refining Solutions reporting unit included significant judgment and assumptions relating to revenue growth rates and adjusted EBITDA margins.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessment of the Refining Solutions reporting unit is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value measurement of the reporting unit; and (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to revenue growth rates and adjusted EBITDA margins.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s goodwill impairment assessment, including controls over the valuation of the Refining Solutions reporting unit. These procedures also included, among others (i) testing management’s process for developing the fair value estimate of the Refining Solutions reporting unit; (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model; (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in the model; and (iv) evaluating the significant assumptions used by management related to the revenue growth rates and adjusted EBITDA margins. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the revenue growth rates and adjusted EBITDA margins involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the reporting unit; (ii) the consistency with external economic and industry data; and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 18, 2022

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1994.
76

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Year Ended December 31202120202019
Net sales$3,327,957 $3,128,909 $3,589,427 
Cost of goods sold2,329,986 2,134,056 2,331,649 
Gross profit997,971 994,853 1,257,778 
Selling, general and administrative expenses441,482 429,827 533,368 
Research and development expenses54,026 59,214 58,287 
Gain on sale of business/interest in properties, net(295,971)— — 
Operating profit798,434 505,812 666,123 
Interest and financing expenses(61,476)(73,116)(57,695)
Other expenses, net(603,340)(59,177)(45,478)
Income before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments133,618 373,519 562,950 
Income tax expense29,446 54,425 88,161 
Income before equity in net income of unconsolidated investments104,172 319,094 474,789 
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax)95,770 127,521 129,568 
Net income199,942 446,615 604,357 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(76,270)(70,851)(71,129)
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$123,672 $375,764 $533,228 
Basic earnings per share$1.07 $3.53 $5.03 
Diluted earnings per share$1.06 $3.52 $5.02 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic115,841 106,402 105,949 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—diluted116,536 106,808 106,321 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

77

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 31202120202019
Net income$199,942 $446,615 $604,357 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation and other(74,385)99,832 (61,399)
Net investment hedge5,110 (34,185)8,441 
Cash flow hedge174 1,602 4,847 
Interest rate swap2,623 2,601 2,591 
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(66,478)69,850 (45,520)
Comprehensive income133,464 516,465 558,837 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(76,110)(71,098)(70,662)
Comprehensive income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$57,354 $445,367 $488,175 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
78

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands)
December 3120212020
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$439,272 $746,724 
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts (2021—$2,559; 2020—$2,083)556,922 530,838 
Other accounts receivable66,184 61,958 
Inventories812,920 750,237 
Other current assets132,683 116,427 
Total current assets2,007,981 2,206,184 
Property, plant and equipment, at cost8,074,746 7,427,641 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization2,165,130 2,073,016 
Net property, plant and equipment5,909,616 5,354,625 
Investments897,708 656,244 
Other assets252,239 219,268 
Goodwill1,597,627 1,665,520 
Other intangibles, net of amortization308,947 349,105 
Total assets$10,974,118 $10,450,946 
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$647,986 $483,221 
Accrued expenses763,293 440,763 
Current portion of long-term debt389,920 804,677 
Dividends payable45,469 40,937 
Income taxes payable27,667 32,251 
Total current liabilities1,874,335 1,801,849 
Long-term debt2,004,319 2,767,381 
Postretirement benefits43,693 48,075 
Pension benefits229,187 340,818 
Other noncurrent liabilities663,698 629,377 
Deferred income taxes353,279 394,852 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)00
Equity:
Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value (authorized 150,000 shares), issued and outstanding — 117,015 in 2021 and 106,842 in 20201,170 1,069 
Additional paid-in capital2,920,007 1,438,038 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(392,450)(326,132)
Retained earnings3,096,539 3,155,252 
Total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity5,625,266 4,268,227 
Noncontrolling interests180,341 200,367 
Total equity5,805,607 4,468,594 
Total liabilities and equity$10,974,118 $10,450,946 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
79

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) IncomeRetained EarningsTotal Albemarle
Shareholders’ Equity
Noncontrolling InterestsTotal Equity
SharesAmounts
Balance at January 1, 2019105,616,028 $1,056 $1,368,897 $(350,682)$2,566,050 $3,585,321 $173,787 $3,759,108 
Net income533,228 533,228 71,129 604,357 
Other comprehensive loss(45,053)(45,053)(467)(45,520)
Cash dividends declared, $1.47 per common share(155,800)(155,800)(83,187)(238,987)
Stock-based compensation21,284 21,284 21,284 
Exercise of stock options161,909 4,812 4,814 4,814 
Issuance of common stock, net396,269 (4)— — 
Increase in ownership interest of noncontrolling interest(513)(513)68 (445)
Shares withheld for withholding taxes associated with common stock issuances(133,991)(1)(11,030)(11,031)(11,031)
Balance at December 31, 2019106,040,215 $1,061 $1,383,446 $(395,735)$2,943,478 $3,932,250 $161,330 $4,093,580 
Net income375,764 375,764 70,851 446,615 
Other comprehensive loss69,603 69,603 247 69,850 
Cash dividends declared, $1.54 per common share(163,990)(163,990)(32,061)(196,051)
Stock-based compensation19,306 19,306 19,306 
Exercise of stock options682,068 40,430 40,437 40,437 
Issuance of common stock, net185,918 (2)— — 
Shares withheld for withholding taxes associated with common stock issuances(65,832)(1)(5,142)(5,143)(5,143)
Balance at December 31, 2020106,842,369 $1,069 $1,438,038 $(326,132)$3,155,252 $4,268,227 $200,367 $4,468,594 
Net income123,672 123,672 76,270 199,942 
Other comprehensive income(66,318)(66,318)(160)(66,478)
Cash dividends declared, $1.56 per common share(182,385)(182,385)(96,136)(278,521)
Stock-based compensation18,818 18,818 18,818 
Fees related to public issuance of common stock(888)(888)(888)
Exercise of stock options302,151 18,389 18,392 18,392 
Issuance of common stock, net9,919,755 99 1,453,789 1,453,888 1,453,888 
Shares withheld for withholding taxes associated with common stock issuances(48,942)(1)(8,139)(8,140)(8,140)
Balance at December 31, 2021117,015,333 $1,170 $2,920,007 $(392,450)$3,096,539 $5,625,266 $180,341 $5,805,607 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

80

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
Year Ended December 31202120202019
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year$746,724 $613,110 $555,320 
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income199,942 446,615 604,357 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization254,000 231,984 213,484 
Gain on sale of business/interest in properties, net(295,971)(7,168)— 
Gain on sale of property— — (14,411)
Stock-based compensation and other20,120 22,837 19,680 
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax)(95,770)(127,521)(129,568)
Dividends received from unconsolidated investments and nonmarketable securities78,391 88,161 71,746 
Pension and postretirement (benefit) expense(74,010)45,658 31,515 
Pension and postretirement contributions(30,253)(16,434)(16,478)
Unrealized gain on investments in marketable securities(3,818)(4,635)(2,809)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt28,955 — 4,829 
Deferred income taxes(38,500)(1,976)14,394 
Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable(49,295)100,118 (18,220)
(Increase) decrease in inventories(127,401)51,978 (46,304)
Decrease (increase) in other current assets17,411 7,902 (32,941)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable143,939 (31,519)(12,234)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and income taxes payable127,068 (215,011)(4,640)
Non-cash transfer of 40% value of construction in progress of Kemerton plant to MRL135,928 179,437 164,496 
Other, net53,521 28,488 (127,522)
Net cash provided by operating activities344,257 798,914 719,374 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired— (22,572)(820,000)
Capital expenditures(953,667)(850,477)(851,796)
Cash proceeds from divestitures, net289,791 — — 
Proceeds from sale of joint venture— 11,000 — 
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment— — 10,356 
Sales of marketable securities, net3,774 903 384 
Investments in equity and other corporate investments(6,488)(2,427)(2,569)
Net cash used in investing activities(666,590)(863,573)(1,663,625)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock1,453,888 — — 
Proceeds from borrowings of other long-term debt— 452,163 1,597,807 
Repayments of long-term debt and credit agreements(1,173,823)(250,000)(175,215)
Other borrowings (repayments), net60,991 137,635 (126,364)
Fees related to early extinguishment of debt(24,877)— (4,419)
Dividends paid to shareholders(177,853)(161,818)(152,204)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests(96,136)(32,061)(83,187)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options18,392 40,437 4,814 
Withholding taxes paid on stock-based compensation award distributions(8,140)(5,143)(11,031)
Other(2,230)(3,952)(7,514)
Net cash provided by financing activities50,212 177,261 1,042,687 
Net effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents(35,331)21,012 (40,646)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(307,452)133,614 57,790 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$439,272 $746,724 $613,110 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
81

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of Albemarle Corporation and our wholly owned, majority owned and controlled subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise indicates, the terms “Albemarle,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “the Company” mean Albemarle Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. For entities that we control and are the primary beneficiary, but own less than 100%, we record the minority ownership as noncontrolling interest, except as noted below. We apply the equity method of accounting for investments in which we have an ownership interest from 20% to 50% or where we exercise significant influence over the related investee’s operations. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
As described further in Note 2, “Acquisitions,” we completed the acquisition of a 60% ownership interest in Mineral Resources Limited’s (“MRL”) Wodgina hard rock lithium mine project (“Wodgina Project”) on October 31, 2019 creating a joint venture named MARBL Lithium Joint Venture (“MARBL”). The consolidated financial statements contained herein include our proportionate share of the results of operations of the Wodgina Project, commencing on November 1, 2019.
Estimates, Assumptions and Reclassifications
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States (“U.S.”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services, and is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied under the terms of contracts with our customers. A performance obligation is deemed to be satisfied when control of the product or service is transferred to our customer. The transaction price of a contract, or the amount we expect to receive upon satisfaction of all performance obligations, is determined by reference to the contract’s terms and includes adjustments, if applicable, for any variable consideration, such as customer rebates, noncash consideration or consideration payable to the customer, although these adjustments are generally not material. Where a contract contains more than one distinct performance obligation, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the standalone selling price of each performance obligation, although these situations do not occur frequently and are generally not built into our contracts. Any unsatisfied performance obligations are not material. Standalone selling prices are based on prices we charge to our customers, which in some cases is based on established market prices. Sales and other similar taxes collected from customers on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue. Our payment terms are generally between 30 to 90 days, however, they vary by market factors, such as customer size, creditworthiness, geography and competitive environment.
All of our revenue is derived from contracts with customers, and almost all of our contracts with customers contain one performance obligation for the transfer of goods where such performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time. Control of a product is deemed to be transferred to the customer upon shipment or delivery. Significant portions of our sales are sold free on board shipping point or on an equivalent basis, while delivery terms of other transactions are based upon specific contractual arrangements. Our standard terms of delivery are generally included in our contracts of sale, order confirmation documents and invoices, while the timing between shipment and delivery generally ranges between 1 and 45 days. Costs for shipping and handling activities, whether performed before or after the customer obtains control of the goods, are accounted for as fulfillment costs.
The Company currently utilizes the following practical expedients, as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:
All sales and other pass-through taxes are excluded from contract value;
In utilizing the modified retrospective transition method, no adjustment was necessary for contracts that did not cross over the reporting year;
We will not consider the possibility of a contract having a significant financing component (which would effectively attribute a portion of the sales price to interest income) unless, if at contract inception, the expected payment terms (from time of delivery or other relevant criterion) are more than one year;
82

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




If our right to customer payment is directly related to the value of our completed performance, we recognize revenue consistent with the invoicing right; and
We expense as incurred all costs of obtaining a contract incremental to any costs/compensation attributable to individual product sales/shipments for contracts where the amortization period for such costs would otherwise be one year or less.
Certain products we produce are made to our customer’s specifications where such products have limited alternative use or would need significant rework costs in order to be sold to another customer. In management’s judgment, control of these arrangements is transferred to the customer at a point in time (upon shipment or delivery) and not over the time they are produced. Therefore revenue is recognized upon shipment or delivery of these products.
Costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers are not significant and are expensed immediately as the amortization period would be one year or less. When the Company incurs pre-production or other fulfillment costs in connection with an existing or specific anticipated contract and such costs are recoverable through margin or explicitly reimbursable, such costs are capitalized and amortized to Cost of goods sold on a systematic basis that is consistent with the pattern of transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates, which is less than one year. We record bad debt expense in specific situations when we determine the customer is unable to meet its financial obligation.
Included in Trade accounts receivable at December 31, 2021 and 2020 is approximately $544.1 million and $522.3 million, respectively, arising from contracts with customers. The remaining balance of Trade accounts receivable at December 31, 2021 and 2020 primarily includes value-added taxes collected from customers on behalf of various taxing authorities.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market investments with insignificant interest rate risks and no limitations on access.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at lower of cost and net realizable value with cost determined primarily on the first-in, first-out basis. Cost is determined on the weighted-average basis for a small portion of our inventories at foreign plants and our stores, supplies and other inventory. A portion of our domestic produced finished goods and raw materials are determined on the last-in, first-out basis.

Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment include costs of assets constructed, purchased or leased under a finance lease, related delivery and installation costs and interest incurred on significant capital projects during their construction periods. Expenditures for renewals and betterments also are capitalized, but expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with yearly planned major maintenance are generally deferred and amortized over 12 months or until the same major maintenance activities must be repeated, whichever is shorter. The cost and accumulated depreciation applicable to assets retired or sold are removed from the respective accounts, and gains or losses thereon are included in income.
We assign the useful lives of our property, plant and equipment based upon our internal engineering estimates which are reviewed periodically. The estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment range from two to sixty years and depreciation is recorded on the straight-line method, with the exception of our mineral rights and reserves, which are depleted on a units-of-production method.
We evaluate the recovery of our property, plant and equipment by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized.
Leases
Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, “Leases” and all related amendments using the modified retrospective method. As part of this adoption, we have elected the practical expedient relief
83

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




package allowed by the new standard, which does not require the reassessment of (1) whether existing contracts contain a lease, (2) the lease classification or (3) unamortized initial direct costs for existing leases; and have elected to apply hindsight to the existing leases. Additionally, we have made accounting policy elections such as exclusion of short-term leases (leases with a term of 12 months or less and which do not include a purchase option that we are reasonably certain to exercise) from the balance sheet presentation, use of portfolio approach in determination of discount rate and accounting for non-lease components in a contract as part of a single lease component for all asset classes, except specific mining operation equipment.
We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As an implicit rate for most of our leases is not determinable, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The lease payments for the initial measurement of lease ROU assets and lease liabilities include fixed and variable payments based on an index or a rate. Variable lease payments that are not index or rate based are recorded as expenses when incurred. Our variable lease payments typically include real estate taxes, insurance costs and common-area maintenance. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made, net of lease incentives. The lease term is the non-cancelable period of the lease, including any options to extend, purchase or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. We amortize the operating lease ROU assets on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease and the finance lease ROU assets on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease terms. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet, and we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Resource Development Expenses
We incur costs in resource exploration, evaluation and development during the different phases of our resource development projects. Exploration costs incurred before the declaration of proven and probable resources are generally expensed as incurred. After proven and probable resources are declared, exploration, evaluation and development costs necessary to bring the property to commercial capacity or increase the capacity or useful life are capitalized. Any costs to maintain the production capacity in a property under production are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized resource costs are depleted using the units-of-production method. Our resource development assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Investments
Investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting if the investment gives us the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee. Significant influence is generally deemed to exist if we have an ownership interest in the voting stock of the investee between 20% and 50%, although other factors, such as representation on the investee’s board of directors and the impact of commercial arrangements, are considered in determining whether the equity method of accounting is appropriate. Under the equity method of accounting, we record our investments in equity-method investees in the consolidated balance sheets as Investments and our share of investees’ earnings or losses together with other-than-temporary impairments in value as Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments in the consolidated statements of income. We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may be impaired. If a decline in the value of an equity method investment is determined to be other than temporary, a loss is recorded in earnings in the current period.
Certain mutual fund investments are accounted for as trading equities and are marked-to-market on a periodic basis through the consolidated statements of income. Investments in joint ventures and nonmarketable securities of immaterial entities are estimated based upon the overall performance of the entity where financial results are not available on a timely basis.
Environmental Compliance and Remediation
Environmental compliance costs include the cost of purchasing and/or constructing assets to prevent, limit and/or control pollution or to monitor the environmental status at various locations. These costs are capitalized and depreciated based on estimated useful lives. Environmental compliance costs also include maintenance and operating costs with respect to pollution prevention and control facilities and other administrative costs. Such operating costs are expensed as incurred. Environmental remediation costs of facilities used in current operations are generally immaterial and are expensed as incurred. We accrue for environmental remediation costs and post-remediation costs that relate to existing conditions caused by past operations at facilities or off-plant disposal sites in the accounting period in which responsibility is established and when the related costs are
84

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




estimable. In developing these cost estimates, we evaluate currently available facts regarding each site, with consideration given to existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations, prior experience in remediation of contaminated sites, the financial capability of other potentially responsible parties and other factors, subject to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process. If the amount and timing of the cash payments for a site are fixed or reliably determinable, the liability is discounted, if the calculated discount is material. Additionally, these estimates are reviewed periodically, with adjustments to the accruals recorded as necessary.
Research and Development Expenses
Our research and development expenses related to present and future products are expensed as incurred. These expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs and other overheads, as well as outside service and consulting costs incurred for specific programs. Our U.S. facilities in Texas and Louisiana and our global facilities in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium and Korea form the capability base for our contract research and custom manufacturing businesses. These business areas provide research and scale-up services primarily to innovative life science companies.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and other intangibles acquired in a business combination in conformity with current accounting guidance that requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets not be amortized.
We test goodwill for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of our reporting units to the related carrying value. Our reporting units are either our operating business segments or one level below our operating business segments for which discrete financial information is available and for which operating results are regularly reviewed by the business management. In applying the goodwill impairment test, the Company initially performs a qualitative test (“Step 0”), where it first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance of the reporting units and other entity and reporting unit specific events. If after assessing these qualitative factors, the Company determines it is “more-likely-than-not” that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, the Company performs a quantitative test (“Step 1”). During Step 1, the Company estimates the fair value based on present value techniques involving future cash flows. Future cash flows for all reporting units include assumptions about revenue growth rates, adjusted EBITDA margins, discount rate as well as other economic or industry-related factors. For the Refining Solutions reporting unit, the revenue growth rates and adjusted EBITDA margins were deemed to be significant assumptions. Significant management judgment is involved in estimating these variables and they include inherent uncertainties since they are forecasting future events. We perform a sensitivity analysis by using a range of inputs to confirm the reasonableness of these estimates being used in the goodwill impairment analysis. We use a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) approach to determine our discount rate for goodwill recoverability testing. Our WACC calculation incorporates industry-weighted average returns on debt and equity from a market perspective. The factors in this calculation are largely external to the Company and, therefore, are beyond our control. We test our recorded goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year or upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying amounts. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2021 and no evidence of impairment was noted from the analysis. As a result, the Company concluded there was no impairment as of that date.
We assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names and trademarks, for impairment annually and between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment standard allows us to first assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only required if we determine, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If we determine based on the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, an impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to its carrying amount. During the year ended December 31, 2021, no evidence of impairment was noted from the analysis for our indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Definite-lived intangible assets, such as purchased technology, patents and customer lists, are amortized over their estimated useful lives generally for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years. Except for customer lists and relationships associated with the majority of our Lithium business, which are amortized using the pattern of economic benefit method, definite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method. We evaluate the recovery of our definite-lived intangible assets by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset
85

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. See Note 12, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles.”
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
Under authoritative accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets. As required, we recognize a balance sheet asset or liability for each of our pension and other postretirement benefit (“OPEB”) plans equal to the plan’s funded status as of the measurement date. The primary assumptions are as follows:
Discount Rate—The discount rate is used in calculating the present value of benefits, which is based on projections of benefit payments to be made in the future.
Expected Return on Plan Assets—We project the future return on plan assets based on prior performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plans, as well as the expected long-term allocation of plan assets for these investments. These projected returns reduce the net benefit costs recorded currently.
Rate of Compensation Increase—For salary-related plans, we project employees’ annual pay increases, which are used to project employees’ pension benefits at retirement.
Mortality Assumptions—Assumptions about life expectancy of plan participants are used in the measurement of related plan obligations.
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized annually in our consolidated statements of income in the fourth quarter and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for a remeasurement during a fiscal year. The remaining components of pension and OPEB plan expense, primarily service cost, interest cost and expected return on assets, are recorded on a monthly basis. The market-related value of assets equals the actual market value as of the date of measurement.
During 2021, we made changes to assumptions related to discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets. We consider available information that we deem relevant when selecting each of these assumptions.
In selecting the discount rates for the U.S. plans, we consider expected benefit payments on a plan-by-plan basis. As a result, the Company uses different discount rates for each plan depending on the demographics of participants and the expected timing of benefit payments. For 2019,2021, the discount rates were calculated using the results from a bond matching technique developed by Milliman, which matched the future estimated annual benefit payments of each respective plan against a portfolio of bonds of high quality to determine the discount rate. We believe our selected discount rates are determined using preferred methodology under authoritative accounting guidance and accurately reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 20192021 measurement date.
In selecting the discount rates for the foreign plans, we look at long-term yields on AA-rated corporate bonds when available. Our actuaries have developed yield curves based on the yields on the constituent bonds in the various indices as well as on other market indicators such as swap rates, particularly at the longer durations. For the Eurozone, we apply the Aon Hewitt yield curve to projected cash flows from the relevant plans to derive the discount rate. For the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), the discount rate is determined by applying the Aon Hewitt yield curve for typical schemes of similar duration to
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





projected cash flows of Albemarle’s U.K. plan. In other countries where there is not a sufficiently deep market of high-quality corporate bonds, we set the discount rate by referencing the yield on government bonds of an appropriate duration.
In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we consider past performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plan as well as the expected long-term allocation of plan assets to these investments. In projecting the rate of compensation increase, we consider past experience in light of movements in inflation rates.
In October 2018,For the Society of Actuaries (“SOA”) published an updated Mortality Improvement Scale, MP-2018. The updated improvement scale incorporates an additional year of mortality data (2016). We utilized the same base mortality, SOA RP-2014 Adjusted to 2006 Total Dataset Mortality, but we revised our mortality assumption to incorporate the MP-2018 Mortality Improvement Scale for purposes of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December 31, 2018. In October 2019, the SOA published the Pri-2012 Mortality Tables and an updated Improvement Scale, MP-2019. The Pri-2012 Mortality Tables are an update to the RP-2014 Adjusted to 2006 Total Dataset Mortality while the updated improvement scale incorporates an additional year of mortality data (2017). We revised both the base mortality tables and mortality improvement assumption by incorporating both the Pri-2012 Mortality Tables and MP-2019 Mortality Improvement Scale for purpose of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December 31, 2019.2021 and 2020, we used the Pri-2012 Mortality Tables along with the MP-2021 and MP-2020 Mortality Improvement Scale, respectively, published by the SOA.
Stock-based Compensation Expense
The fair value of restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and performance unit awards with a service condition are determined based on the number of shares or units granted and the quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant, and the fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value of performance unit awards with a service condition and a market condition are estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The fair value of these awards is determined after giving effect to estimated forfeitures. Such value is recognized as expense over the service period, which is generally the vesting period of the equity grant. To the extent restricted
86

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, performance unit awards and stock options are forfeited prior to vesting in excess of the estimated forfeiture rate, the corresponding previously recognized expense is reversed as an offset to operating expenses.
Income Taxes
We use the liability method for determining our income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. In order to record deferred tax assets and liabilities, we are following guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASU 2015-17, which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet, along with any related valuation allowance. Tax effects are released from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income using either the specific identification approach or the portfolio approach based on the nature of the underlying item.
Deferred income taxes are provided for the estimated income tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also provided for operating losses, capital losses and certain tax credit carryovers. A valuation allowance, reducing deferred tax assets, is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of such deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character. Although realization is not assured, we do not establish a valuation allowance when we believe it is more likely than not that a net deferred tax asset will be realized.
We only recognize a tax benefit after concluding that it is more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained upon audit by the respective taxing authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. Once the recognition threshold is met, we recognize a tax benefit measured as the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in our judgment, is greater than 50% likely to be realized. Under current accounting guidance for uncertain tax positions, interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in Income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income.
We have designated the undistributed earnings of a portion of our foreign operations as indefinitely reinvested and as a result we do not provide for deferred income taxes on the unremitted earnings of these subsidiaries. Our foreign earnings are computed under U.S. federal tax earnings and profits, or E&P, principles. In general, to the extent our financial reporting book basis over tax basis of a foreign subsidiary exceeds these E&P amounts, deferred taxes have not been provided as they are essentially permanent in duration. The determination of the amount of such unrecognized deferred tax liability is not practicable. We provide for deferred income taxes on our undistributed earnings of foreign operations that are not deemed to be
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





indefinitely invested. We will continue to evaluate our permanent investment assertion taking into consideration all relevant and current tax laws.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) was signed into law in the U.S. The TCJA contains several key tax provisions including, among other things, the reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, the requirement of companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, and the creation of new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings such as global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”). A company can elect an accounting policy to account for GILTI as a period charge in the future period the tax arises or as part of deferred taxes related to the investment or subsidiary. The Company has elected to account for GILTI as a period cost.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss comprises principally foreign currency translation adjustments, amounts related to the revaluation of our euro-denominated senior notes which were designated as a hedge of our net investment in foreign operations in 2014, a realized loss on a forward starting interest rate swap entered into in 2014 which was designated as a cash flow hedge, gains or losses on foreign currency cash flow hedges designated as effective hedging instruments, and deferred income taxes related to the aforementioned items.
Foreign Currency Translation
The assets and liabilities of all foreign subsidiaries were prepared in their respective functional currencies and translated into U.S. Dollars based on the current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet dates, while income and expenses were translated at average exchange rates for the periods presented. Translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of equity.
Foreign exchange transaction and revaluation lossesgains (losses) were $27.4$0.1 million, $10.5($28.8) million and $11.1($27.4) million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively, and are included in Other expenses, net, in our consolidated statements of income, with the unrealized portion included in Other, net, in our consolidated statements of cash flows.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We manage our foreign currency exposures by balancing certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and through the use of foreign currency forward contracts from time to time, which generally expire within one yearyear. The
87

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

. The


principal objective of such contracts is to minimize the financial impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. While these contracts are subject to fluctuations in value, such fluctuations are generally expected to be offset by changes in the value of the underlying foreign currency exposures being hedged. Gains or losses under foreign currency forward contracts that have been designated as an effective hedging instrument under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging will be recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss beginning on the date of designation. All other gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts not designated as an effective hedging instrument are recognized currently in Other expenses, net, and generally do not have a significant impact on results of operations.
We may also enter into interest rate swaps, collars or similar instruments from time to time, with the objective of reducing interest rate volatility relating to our borrowing costs.
The counterparties to these contractual agreements are major financial institutions with which we generally have other financial relationships. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties. We do not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we entered into a foreign currency forward contract to hedge the cash flow exposure of non-functional currency purchases during the construction of the Kemerton plant in Australia and designated it as an effective hedging instrument under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. All other foreign currency forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 have not been designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires assets and liabilities arising from leases to be recorded onsimplifies the balance sheet. Additional disclosures are required regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. In July 2018, the FASB issued an amendment which would allow entities to initially apply this new standard at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative effect adjustmentaccounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the opening balancegeneral principles in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740. The amendments also improve consistent application of Retained earnings. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2019 using this transition method. See Note 18, “Leases,”and simplify U.S. GAAP for further details.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





In June 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance that, among other things, changes the way entities recognize impairmentareas of financial assetsASC Topic 740 by requiring immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of the financial asset. Additional disclosures are required regarding an entity’s assumptions, modelsclarifying and methods for estimating the expected credit loss.amending existing guidance. This guidance will beis effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2020 and it did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance to simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a reporting unit to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit has been acquired in a business combination. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. All other goodwill impairment guidance will remain unchanged. Entities will continue to have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary.2020. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2020 and it did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2017, the FASB issued accounting guidance to better align an entity’s risk management activities with hedge accounting, simply the application of hedge accounting, and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedging programs. This guidance will make more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting. It also amends the presentation and disclosure requirements and changes how companies assess effectiveness. In October 2018, the FASB issued additional guidance that permits the use of the Overnight Index Swap Rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. These new requirements became effective on January 1, 20192021 and did not have a significant impact on ourthe consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018,March 2020, the FASB issued accounting guidance that provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The guidance applies only to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. In January 2021, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance which clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The guidance under both FASB issuances is effective March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company currently does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2021, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires implementation costs incurreddisclosures about government assistance in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contractthe notes to be capitalized. Entitiesthe financial statements. This guidance will be required to recognizerequire the capitalized implementation costs to expense overdisclosure of: (1) the noncancellable termtypes of government assistance received; (2) the accounting for such assistance; and (3) the effect of the cloud computing arrangement. As allowed by its provisions, we early-adoptedassistance on a business entity’s financial statements. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021. The Company currently does not expect this new guidance in the first quarter of 2019. The adoption of this new guidance did notto have a significant impact on our consolidatedits annual financial statements.statement disclosures.
NOTE 2—Acquisitions:
Guangxi Tianyuan New Energy Materials Acquisition
On September 30, 2021, the Company signed a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity of Guangxi Tianyuan New Energy Materials Co., Ltd. (“Tianyuan”), for approximately $200 million in cash. Tianyuan's operations include a recently constructed lithium processing plant strategically positioned near the Port of Qinzhou in Guangxi. The plant has designed annual conversion capacity of up to 25,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) and is capable of producing battery-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide. The plant is currently in the commissioning stage and is expected to begin commercial production in the first half of 2022. The Company expects the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, to close in the first half of 2022.
Wodgina Acquisition
On October 31, 2019, (the “Acquisition Closing Date”), we completed the previously announced acquisition of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project for a total purchase price of approximately $1.3 billion. The purchase price is comprised of $820 million in cash subject to certain adjustments capped at $22.5 million, and the transfer of 40% interest in certain lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built by Albemarle in Kemerton, Western Australia, originally valued at $480 million. The cash consideration was initially funded by the 2019 Credit Facility entered into
88

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




on August 14, 2019; see Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” for further details. During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company revised its estimate of the obligation to construct these lithium hydroxide conversion assets due to anticipated cost overruns from supply chain, labor and COVID-19 pandemic related issues. Consequently, a $132.4 million expense is included in Gain on sale of business/interest in properties, net, within operating income for the year ended December 31, 2021, with a corresponding obligation recorded in Accrued liabilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we paid $22.6 million of agreed upon purchase price adjustments. The stamp duty levied on the assets purchased of $61.5 million, originally recorded as an expense based on an estimated calculation during the year ended December 31, 2019, was paid during the year ended December 31, 2020 and is included in Change in working capital on the consolidated statement of cash flows.
In addition, we have formed an unincorporated joint venture with MRL, MARBL, for the exploration, development, mining, processing and production of lithium and other minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) from the Wodgina Project and for the operation of the Kemerton assets. We are entitled to a pro rata portion of 60% of all minerals (other than iron ore and tantalum) recovered from the tenements and produced by the joint venture. The joint venture is unincorporated with each investor holding an undivided interest in each asset and proportionately liable for each liability; therefore our proportionate share of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses are included in the appropriate classifications in the consolidated financial statements. As part of this acquisition, MARBL Lithium Operations Pty. Ltd. (the “Manager”), an incorporated joint venture, has been formed to manage the Wodgina Project. We will consolidate our 60% ownership interest in the Manager in our consolidated financial statements.
This acquisition provides access to a high-quality hard rock lithium source, further diversifying our global lithium resource base, and strengthens our position by increasing capacity to support future market demand. InSince its acquisition in 2019, the short-term, we will idleWodgina mine idled production of spodumene until the Wodgina Project until market conditions supportdemand supported bringing the mine back into production. MARBL recently announced its intention to resume spodumene concentrate production economics.at this site, with the production restart expected during the second quarter of 2022.
The results of our 60% ownership interest in MARBL are reported within the Lithium segment. Included in Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the period November 1 through December 31, 2019 were losses of approximately $32.8 million, $20.1 million and $73.0 million, respectively, attributable to the joint venture. Included in the loss recorded in 2019 was an estimated loss of $64.8 million related to the stamp duties levied on the assets purchased. The adjustment to the final amount of stamp duties levied was recorded, and the full amount was paid, during the year ended December 31, 2019 is a loss of approximately $73.0 million
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





attributable to the joint venture from November 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.2020 as noted above. There were no net sales attributable to the joint venture during this period. Included in Cost of goods sold and Selling, general and administrative expenses on our consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2019 is $1.0 million and $7.5 million, respectively, of costs directly related to this acquisition, primarily consisting of professional services and advisory fees, and $64.8 million of costs, included in Selling, general and administrative expenses, related to stamp duties levied on the assets purchased, with the unpaid balance recorded in Accrued expenses as of December 31, 2019.these periods. Pro forma financial information of the combined entities for periods prior to the acquisition is not presented due to the immaterial impact of the Net Sales and Net Income of the Wodgina Project on our consolidated statements of income.
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
The aggregate purchase price noted above was allocated to the major categories of assetsAcquisition and liabilities acquired based upon their estimated fair values at the Acquisition Closing Date, which were based, in part, upon third-party appraisals for certain assets. The excess of the purchase price over the preliminary estimated fair value of the net assets acquired was approximately $31.8 million and was recorded as Goodwill.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the joint venture and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date, which have been allocated on a preliminary basis (in thousands):
Total purchase price: 
Cash paid$820,000
Fair value of 40% interest in Kemerton assets480,000
Purchase agreement completion adjustment and other adjustments23,566
Total purchase price$1,323,566
  
Net assets acquired: 
Inventories$33,900
Other current assets10,695
Property, plant and equipment: 
Buildings and improvements22,200
Machinery and equipment163,806
Mineral rights and reserves1,046,300
Construction in progress103,700
Other assets1,000
Current liabilities(10,695)
Long-term debt(a)
(55,806)
Other noncurrent liabilities(23,296)
Total identifiable net assets1,291,804
Goodwill31,762
Total net assets acquired$1,323,566

(a)Represents 60% ownership interest in finance lease acquired. See Note 18, “Leases,” for further information on the Company’s leases.
The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including the residual amount allocated to Goodwill, is based upon preliminary information and is subject to change within the measurement-period (up to one year from the acquisition date) as additional information concerning final asset and liability valuations is obtained. The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized relate to the fair value of Mineral rights and reserves and Goodwill. The fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on management’s preliminary estimates and assumptions, as well as other information compiled by management, including valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques. The fair value of the mineral reserves of $1,005.3 million is determined using an excess earnings approach, which requires management to estimate future cash flows, net of capital investments in the specific operation. Management’s cash flow projections involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the expected production of the mine over the estimated time period, sales prices, shipment volumes, and expected profit margins. The present value of the projected net cash flows represents the preliminary fair value assigned to mineral reserves. The discount rate is a significant assumption used in the valuation model.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





While the Company believes that such preliminary estimates provide a reasonable basis for estimating the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, it will evaluate any necessary information prior to finalization of the amounts. During the measurement-period, the Company will adjust assets or liabilities if new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have resulted in revised estimated values of those assets or liabilities as of that date. The effect of measurement-period adjustments to the estimated fair values will be recognized in the reporting period in which they are determined. The impact of all changes that do not qualify as measurement-period adjustments will be included in current period earnings. If the actual results differ from the estimates and judgments used in these fair values, the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements could be subject to possible impairment.
Goodwill arising from the acquisition consists largely of anticipated synergies and economies of scale from the combined companies and overall strategic importance of the acquired businesses to Albemarle. The goodwill attributable to the acquisition will not be amortizable or deductible for tax purposes.

Other Acquisitions
On February 1, 2017, the Company acquired the remaining 50% interest in the Sales de Magnesio Ltda. (“Salmag”) joint venture in Chile from SQM Salar S.A. for approximately $8.3 million, net of cash acquired. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded a gain of $6.2 million, calculated based on the difference between the purchase price and the book value of the investment in Other expenses, net on the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2017.integration related costs
Acquisition and integration related costs for the yearyears ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 of $1.0$12.7 million, $17.3 million and $19.7$20.7 million were included primarily in Cost of goods sold and Selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, on our consolidated statements of income relating to various significant projects, including the acquisition of the Wodgina Project. Included in acquisition and integration relatedincome. These include costs on our consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018Tianyuan and 2017 is $3.7 millionWodgina acquisitions noted above, as well as various other completed or potential acquisitions and $14.3 million, respectively, in Cost of goods sold and $15.7 million and $19.6 million, respectively, in Selling, general and administrative expenses. These acquisition and integration related costs relate to various significant projects, including the Jiangxi Jiangli New Materials Science and Technology Co. Ltd. (“Jiangli New Materials”) acquisition, which contains non-routine compensation related costs negotiated specifically as a result of this acquisition that are outside of the Company’s ordinary compensation arrangements.divestitures.

NOTE 3—Divestitures:
Polyolefin Catalysts and Components Business
On December 14, 2017,June 1, 2021, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sellcompleted the polyolefin catalysts and components portionsale of its Performance Catalyst Solutionsfine chemistry services (“PCS”FCS”) business (“Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture”) to W.R.W. R. Grace & Co., with the sale closing on April 3, 2018. We received net cash (“Grace”) for proceeds of approximately $413.6$570 million, consisting of $300 million in cash and havethe issuance to Albemarle of preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary having an aggregate stated value of $270 million. The preferred equity can be redeemed at Grace’s option under certain conditions and will accrue payment-in-kind (“PIK”) dividends at an annual rate of 12% beginning two years after issuance.
As part of the transaction, Grace acquired our manufacturing facilities located in South Haven, Michigan and Tyrone, Pennsylvania. The sale of the FCS business reflects the Company’s commitment to investing in its core, growth-oriented business segments. During the year ended December 31, 2021 we recorded a gain of $210.4$428.4 million before income taxes in 2018($330.9 million after taxes) related to the sale of this business.
We determined that this business met the assets held for sale criteria in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment during the first quarter of 2021. The transactionresults of operations of the business classified as held for sale are included Albemarle’s Product Development Center located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and operations at its Yeosu, South Korea site. The salethe consolidated statements of income through June 1, 2021. This business did not includequalify for discontinued operations treatment because the Company’s organometallicsmanagement does not consider the sale as representing a strategic shift that had or curatives portion of its PCS business. The Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture reflectswill have a major effect on the Company’s commitment to investing in the future growth of its high priority businessesoperations and returning capital to shareholders.financial results.
89

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 4—Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Supplemental information related to the consolidated statements of cash flows is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Cash paid during the year for:
Income taxes (net of refunds of $32,677, $25,991 and $7,438 in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively)(a)
$130,840 $52,103 $170,450 
Interest (net of capitalization)$27,734 $66,379 $45,532 
Supplemental non-cash disclosures related to investing activities:
Capital expenditures included in Accounts payable$165,677 $139,120 $199,451 
Non-cash proceeds from divestitures(b)
$244,530 $— $— 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Cash paid during the year for:     
Income taxes (net of refunds of $7,438, $21,459 and $17,522 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively)(a)
$170,450
 $157,758
 $320,222
Interest (net of capitalization)$45,532
 $49,762
 $61,243
      
Supplemental non-cash disclosures related to investing activities:     
Capital expenditures included in Accounts payable$199,451
 $134,784
 $89,188

(a)Includes approximately $41 million of income taxes paid in 2018 from the gain on sale of the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture, and $257 million of income taxes paid in 2017 from the gain on sale of the Chemetall Surface Treatment(a)    Cash paid for income tax during the year ended December 31, 2021 include a $45.0 million payment in the U.S. primarily resulting from the proceeds on the sale of the FCS business.

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





(b)    Fair value of preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary received as part of proceeds for the sale of our FCS business. See Note 3, “Divestitures,” for further details.
As part of the purchase price paid for the acquisition of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project, the Company transferred $135.9 million, $179.4 million and $164.7 million of its construction in progress of the designated Kemerton assets during the yearyears ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, representing MRL’s 40% interest in the assets. Since the acquisition, the Company has transferred the full $480 million of construction in progress to MRL, as defined in the purchase agreement. In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company recorded a $132.4 million expense related to anticipated cost overruns of the designated Kemerton assets. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for further details. The cash outflow for these assets is recorded in Capital expenditures within Cash flows from investing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company expects tonon-cash transfer a total of approximately $480 million over the construction of these assets as definedis recorded in Other, net within Cash flows from operating activities on the purchase agreement. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for further details.

consolidated statements of cash flows.
Other, net within Cash flows from operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 included $14.3$28.7 million, $30.4 million and $28.4$14.3 million, respectively, representing the reclassification of the current portion of the one-time transition tax resulting from the enactment of the TCJA,Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) in 2017, from Other noncurrent liabilities to Income taxes payable within current liabilities. Included in Other, net for the year ended December 31, 2017 is $394.9 million related to the noncurrent portion of the one-time transition tax resulting from the enactment of the TCJA. For additional information, see Note 21, “Income Taxes.” In addition, included in Other, net for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017 is $27.4($0.1) million, $10.5$28.8 million and $11.1$27.4 million, respectively, related to (gains) losses on fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.


90

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




NOTE 5—Earnings Per Share:
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Basic earnings per share     
Numerator:     
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$533,228
 $693,562
 $54,850
Denominator:     
Weighted-average common shares for basic earnings per share105,949
 108,427
 110,914
Basic earnings per share$5.03
 $6.40
 $0.49
Diluted earnings per share     
Numerator:     
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$533,228
 $693,562
 $54,850
Denominator:     
Weighted-average common shares for basic earnings per share105,949
 108,427
 110,914
Incremental shares under stock compensation plans372
 1,031
 1,466
Weighted-average common shares for diluted earnings per share106,321
 109,458
 112,380
Diluted earnings per share$5.02
 $6.34
 $0.49

At December 31, 2019, there were 214,904 common stock equivalents not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Basic earnings per share
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$123,672 $375,764 $533,228 
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares for basic earnings per share115,841 106,402 105,949 
Basic earnings per share$1.07 $3.53 $5.03 
Diluted earnings per share
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$123,672 $375,764 $533,228 
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares for basic earnings per share115,841 106,402 105,949 
Incremental shares under stock compensation plans695 406 372 
Weighted-average common shares for diluted earnings per share116,536 106,808 106,321 
Diluted earnings per share$1.06 $3.52 $5.02 
Included in the calculation of basic earnings per share are unvested restricted stock awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends. At December 31, 2019,2021, there were 18,1003,875 unvested shares of restricted stock awards outstanding.
We have the authority to issue 15 million shares of preferred stock in one or more classes or series. As of December 31, 2019, no2021, 0 shares of preferred stock have been issued.
On February 8, 2021, we completed an underwritten public offering of 8,496,773 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a price to the public of $153.00 per share. The Company also granted to the Underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 1,274,509 shares for a period of 30 days, which was exercised. The total gross proceeds from this offering were approximately $1.5 billion, before deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and commissions.
In November 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in the number of shares the Company is permitted to repurchase under our share repurchase program, pursuant to which the Company is now permitted to repurchase up to a maximum of 15 million shares, including those previously authorized but not yet repurchased.
Under our existing Board authorized share repurchase program, during 2018, the Company entered into two separate accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreements with financial institutions. Under each ASR agreement, the Company paid $250 million from available cash on hand. Under the terms of the first ASR agreement, which was completed on September 28, 2018, the Company received and retired a total of 2,680,704 shares, calculated based on the daily Rule 10b-18 volume-weighted average prices of the Company’s common stock over the term of the ASR agreement, less an agreed discount. Under the terms of the second ASR agreement, which was completed on December 7, 2018, the company received and retired a total of 2,581,950 shares, calculated based on the daily Rule 10b-18 weighted average prices of the Company’s common stock over
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





the terms of the ASR agreement, less an agreed discount. The Company determined that each ASR agreement met the criteria to be accounted for as a forward contract indexed to its stock and was therefore treated as an equity instrument. In total, we received and retired 5,262,654 shares under these agreements, which reduced the Company’s weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Under our existing Board authorized share repurchase program, the Company entered into an ASR agreement with a financial institution on March 1, 2017. Under the ASR agreement, in March 2017, the Company paid $250 million from available cash on hand and received and retired an initial delivery of 1,948,178 shares of our common stock. Under the terms of the ASR agreement, on June 16, 2017, the transaction was completed and we received and retired a final settlement of 392,905 shares, calculated based on the daily Rule 10b-18 volume-weighted average prices of the Company’s common stock over the term of the ASR agreement, less an agreed discount. The Company determined that the ASR agreement met the criteria to be accounted for as a forward contract indexed to its stock and was therefore treated as an equity instrument. In total, we received and retired 2,341,083 shares under the ASR agreement, which reduced the Company’s weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2017.
There were no0 shares of the Company’s common stock repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 or 2019. As of December 31, 2019,2021, there were 7,396,263 remaining shares available for repurchase under the Company’s authorized share repurchase program.

NOTE 6—Other Accounts Receivable:
Other accounts receivable consist of the following at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Value added tax/consumption tax$35,758 $45,309 
Other30,426 16,649 
Total$66,184 $61,958 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Value added tax/consumption tax$52,059
 $40,480
Other15,492
 11,579
Total$67,551
 $52,059


91

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




NOTE 7—Inventories:
The following table provides a breakdown of inventories at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Finished goods$473,836 $454,162 
Raw materials and work in process(a)
259,221 219,896 
Stores, supplies and other79,863 76,179 
Total$812,920 $750,237 
(a)Included $149.4 million and $129.6 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of work in process in our Lithium segment.
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Finished goods(a)
$495,639
 $482,355
Raw materials and work in process(b)
205,781
 158,290
Stores, supplies and other67,564
 59,895
Total$768,984
 $700,540
(a)Included $44.3 million and $104.3 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of chemical grade spodumene in our Lithium segment, most of which is converted to battery-grade products either internally or through our tolling agreements.
(b)Included $109.3 million and $71.4 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of work in process in our Lithium segment.
Approximately 10%6% and 8% of our inventories are valued using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method at December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020, respectively. The portion of our domestic inventories stated on the LIFO basis amounted to $78.7$51.2 million and $69.2$62.2 million at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, which are below replacement cost by approximately $30.8$45.3 million and $32.8$29.7 million, respectively.

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 8—Other Current Assets:
Other current assets consist of the following at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Income tax receivables$76,952 $45,031 
Prepaid expenses49,933 57,531 
Other5,798 13,865 
Total$132,683 $116,427 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Income tax receivables$72,246
 $40,116
Prepaid expenses83,637
 43,172
Other6,930
 1,502
Total$162,813
 $84,790


NOTE 9—Property, Plant and Equipment:
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, consist of the following at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
Useful
Lives
(Years)
December 31,
20212020
Land$117,703 $121,330 
Land improvements10 – 30112,374 115,693 
Buildings and improvements10 – 50383,879 354,679 
Machinery and equipment(a)
2 – 453,619,712 3,564,389 
Mineral rights and reserves7 – 601,783,691 1,780,236 
Construction in progress2,057,387 1,491,314 
Total$8,074,746 $7,427,641 
  
Useful
Lives
(Years)
 December 31,
2019 2018
Land  $116,728
 $123,518
Land improvements 10 – 30 83,256
 63,349
Buildings and improvements 10 – 50 337,728
 251,980
Machinery and equipment(a)
 2 – 45 3,355,519
 2,780,478
Mineral rights and reserves 7 – 60 1,764,067
 696,033
Construction in progress  1,160,545
 883,705
Total   $6,817,843
 $4,799,063

(a)
Consists primarily of (1) short-lived production equipment components, office and building equipment and other equipment with estimated lives ranging 2 – 7 years, (2) production process equipment (intermediate components) with estimated lives ranging 8 – 19 years, (3) production process equipment (major unit components) with estimated lives ranging 20 – 29 years, and (4) production process equipment (infrastructure and other) with estimated lives ranging 30 – 45 years.
(a)Consists primarily of (1) short-lived production equipment components, office and building equipment and other equipment with estimated lives ranging 2 – 7 years, (2) production process equipment (intermediate components) with estimated lives ranging 8 – 19 years, (3) production process equipment (major unit components) with estimated lives ranging 20 – 29 years, and (4) production process equipment (infrastructure and other) with estimated lives ranging 30 – 45 years.
The cost of property, plant and equipment is depreciated generally by the straight-line method. Depletion of mineral rights is based on the units-of-production method. Depreciation expense, including depletion, amounted to $183.3$225.6 million, $170.0$203.6 million and $169.5$183.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively. Interest capitalized on significant capital projects in 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018was $50.0 million, $30.4 million and 2017 was $30.2 million, respectively.
$19.3 million and $7.4 million, respectively.

92

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




NOTE 10—Investments:
Investments include our share of unconsolidated joint ventures, nonmarketable securities and marketable equity securities. The following table details our investment balances at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Joint ventures$593,344 $604,964 
Available for sale debt securities246,517 — 
Nonmarketable securities20,660 14,171 
Marketable equity securities37,187 37,109 
Total$897,708 $656,244 
  December 31,
  2019 2018
Joint ventures $534,430
 $486,032
Nonmarketable securities 11,746
 9,177
Marketable equity securities 33,637
 33,513
Total $579,813
 $528,722

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Our ownership positions in significant unconsolidated investments are shown below:
   December 31,
   2019 2018 2017
* Windfield Holdings Pty. Ltd. - a joint venture with Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries, Inc., that mines lithium ore and produces lithium concentrate49% 49% 49%
* Nippon Aluminum Alkyls - a joint venture with Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. that produces aluminum alkyls50% 50% 50%
* Nippon Ketjen Company Limited - a joint venture with Sumitomo Metal Mining Company Limited that produces refinery catalysts50% 50% 50%
* Eurecat S.A. - a joint venture with Axens Group for refinery catalysts regeneration services50% 50% 50%
* Fábrica Carioca de Catalisadores S.A. - a joint venture with Petrobras Quimica S.A. - PETROQUISA that produces catalysts and includes catalysts research and product development activities50% 50% 50%

December 31,
202120202019
*Windfield Holdings Pty. Ltd. - a joint venture with Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries, Inc., that mines lithium ore and produces lithium concentrate49 %49 %49 %
*Nippon Aluminum Alkyls - a joint venture with Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. that produces aluminum alkyls50 %50 %50 %
*Nippon Ketjen Company Limited - a joint venture with Sumitomo Metal Mining Company Limited that produces refinery catalysts50 %50 %50 %
*Eurecat S.A. - a joint venture with Axens Group for refinery catalysts regeneration services50 %50 %50 %
*Fábrica Carioca de Catalisadores S.A. - a joint venture with Petrobras Quimica S.A. - PETROQUISA that produces catalysts and includes catalysts research and product development activities50 %50 %50 %
Our investment in the significant unconsolidated joint ventures above amounted to $513.8$575.3 million and $466.1$587.6 million as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, and the amount included in Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax) in the consolidated statements of income totaled $128.0$94.9 million, $88.8$126.0 million and $86.8$128.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively. Undistributed earnings attributable to our significant unconsolidated investments represented approximately $216.9$271.9 million and $159.9$255.4 million of our consolidated retained earnings at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. All of the unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have investments are private companies and accordingly do not have a quoted market price available.
The following summary lists the assets, liabilities and results of operations for our significant unconsolidated joint ventures presented herein (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Summary of Balance Sheet Information:
Current assets$485,730 $449,441 
Noncurrent assets1,590,958 1,590,204 
Total assets$2,076,688 $2,039,645 
Current liabilities$209,621 $116,136 
Noncurrent liabilities739,599 769,114 
Total liabilities$949,220 $885,250 

93

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




  December 31,
  2019 2018
Summary of Balance Sheet Information:    
Current assets $473,426
 $476,460
Noncurrent assets 1,404,765
 1,159,866
Total assets $1,878,191
 $1,636,326
     
Current liabilities $201,792
 $191,971
Noncurrent liabilities 583,839
 422,769
Total liabilities $785,631
 $614,740
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Summary of Statements of Income Information:
Net sales$827,848 $597,082 $910,891 
Gross profit$443,129 $266,026 $496,150 
Income before income taxes$269,788 $225,436 $384,690 
Net income$187,084 $157,628 $229,733 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2019 2018 2017
Summary of Statements of Income Information:      
Net sales $910,891
 $829,590
 $687,561
Gross profit $496,150
 $456,518
 $353,577
Income before income taxes $384,690
 $332,632
 $267,805
Net income $229,733
 $225,791
 $184,777

We have evaluated each of the unconsolidated investments pursuant to current accounting guidance and none qualify for consolidation. Dividends received from our significant unconsolidated investments were $78.4 million, $87.4 million and $71.0 million $56.4 millionin 2021, 2020 and $38.1 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
At December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the carrying amount of our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures differed from the amount of underlying equity in net assets by approximately $15.3$30.4 million and $0.4$32.1 million, respectively. These amounts represent the differences between the value of certain assets of the joint ventures and our related valuation on a U.S. GAAP basis.
The Company holds a 49% equity interest in Windfield Holdings Pty. Ltd. (“Windfield”), which we acquired in the Rockwood acquisition. With regards to the Company’s ownership in Windfield, the parties share risks and benefits
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





disproportionate to their voting interests. As a result, the Company considers Windfield to be a variable interest entity (“VIE”). However, the Company does not consolidate Windfield as it is not the primary beneficiary. The carrying amount of our 49% equity interest in Windfield, which is our most significant VIE, was $397.2$462.3 million and $349.6$479.6 million at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively. The Company’s aggregate net investment in all other entities which it considers to be VIE’sVIEs for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary was $7.6$8.0 million and $8.1$8.0 million at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018,2020, respectively. Our unconsolidated VIEs are reported in Investments in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not guarantee debt for, or have other financial support obligations to, these entities, and its maximum exposure to loss in connection with its continuing involvement with these entities is limited to the carrying value of the investments.
As partIn the fourth quarter of 2020, the original Windfield joint venture agreement, Tianqi Lithium Corporation (“Tianqi”) was granted an option to purchase from 20% to 30% of the equity interests in Rockwood Lithium GmbH, a wholly-owned German subsidiary of Albemarle, andCompany divested its subsidiaries. In February 2017, Albemarle and Tianqi terminated the option agreement, and as a result, we will retain 100% of the ownership interest in Rockwood Lithium GmbH and its subsidiaries. Following the terminationSaudi Organometallic Chemicals Company LLC (“SOCC”) joint venture for cash proceeds of $11.0 million. As a result of this divestiture, the option agreement,Company recorded a gain of $7.2 million in Other expenses, net during the $13.1 million fair value of the option agreement originally recorded in Noncontrolling interests was reversed and recorded as an adjustment to Additional paid-in capital.year ended December 31, 2020.
The Company holds a 50% equity interest in Jordan Bromine Company Limited (“JBC”), reported in the Bromine Specialties segment. The Company consolidates this venture as it is considered the primary beneficiary due to its operational and financial control.
On October 31, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project and formed an unincorporated joint venture with MRL. The joint venture is unincorporated with each investor holding an undivided interest in each asset and proportionately liable for each liability; therefore our proportionate share of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses are included in the appropriate classifications in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.
On June 1, 2021, the Company completed the sale of its FCS business to Grace for proceeds of approximately $570 million, consisting of $300 million in cash and the issuance to Albemarle of preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary having an aggregate stated value of $270 million. The preferred equity can be redeemed at Grace’s option under certain conditions and will accrue PIK dividends at an annual rate of 12% beginning June 1, 2023, two years after issuance. The fair value of this preferred equity was $246.5 million at December 31, 2021.
We maintain a Benefit Protection Trust (the “Trust”) that was created to provide a source of funds to assist in meeting the obligations of our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”), subject to the claims of our creditors in the event of our insolvency. Assets of the Trust, in conjunction with our EDCP, are accounted for as trading securities in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. The assets of the Trust consist primarily of mutual fund investments and are marked-to-market on a monthly basis through the consolidated statements of income. As ofAt December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, these marketable securities amounted to $28.7$32.5 million and $26.3$32.4 million, respectively.


94

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




NOTE 11—Other Assets:
Other assets consist of the following at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Deferred income taxes(a)
$18,797 $20,317 
Assets related to unrecognized tax benefits(a)
32,868 24,112 
Operating leases(b)
154,741 136,292 
Other45,833 38,547 
Total$252,239 $219,268 

(a)See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 21, “Income Taxes.”
(b)See Note 18, “Leases.”
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Deferred income taxes(a)
$15,275
 $17,029
Assets related to unrecognized tax benefits(a)
26,127
 12,984
Operating leases(b)
133,864
 
Other(c)
37,795
 50,122
Total$213,061
 $80,135

(a)See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 21, “Income Taxes.”
(b)See Note 18, “Leases.”
(c)As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, a $28.7 million reserve was recorded against a note receivable on one of our European entities no longer deemed probable of collection.

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 12—Goodwill and Other Intangibles:
The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
LithiumBromine
Catalysts(c)
All OtherTotal
Balance at December 31, 2019$1,370,846 $20,319 $181,034 $6,586 $1,578,785 
Acquisitions(a)
4,585 — — — 4,585 
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other66,350 — 15,800 — 82,150 
Balance at December 31, 20201,441,781 20,319 196,834 6,586 1,665,520 
Divestitures(b)
— — — (6,586)(6,586)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(47,599)— (13,708)— (61,307)
Balance at December 31, 2021$1,394,182 $20,319 $183,126 $— $1,597,627 
 Lithium Bromine Specialties Catalysts All Other Total
Balance at December 31, 2017$1,389,089
 $20,319
 $194,361
 $6,586
 $1,610,355
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(34,310) 
 (8,876) 
 (43,186)
Balance at December 31, 20181,354,779
 20,319
 185,485
 6,586
 1,567,169
Acquisitions(a)
31,762
 
 
 
 31,762
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(15,695) 
 (4,451) 
 (20,146)
Balance at December 31, 2019$1,370,846
 $20,319
 $181,034
 $6,586
 $1,578,785

(a)    Amount recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020 represents the finalization of the purchase price adjustments for the Wodgina Project acquisition during the one-year measurement period. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.
(b)    Represents goodwill of the FCS business. See Note 3, “Divestitures,” for additional information.
(c)    Balance at December 31, 2021 and 2020 consists of goodwill related to Refining Solutions (composed of our clean fuels technologies (“CFT”) and fluidized catalytic cracking (“FCC”) catalysts and additives businesses) of $176.0 million and $189.8 million, respectively, and performance catalyst solutions (“PCS”) of $7.1 million and $7.0 million, respectively.


95

(a)Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Represents preliminary purchase price adjustments for the Wodgina Project acquisition recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Other intangibles consist of the following at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
Customer Lists and Relationships
Trade Names and Trademarks(b)
Patents and TechnologyOtherTotal
Gross Asset Value
Balance at December 31, 2019$422,462 $18,087 $55,020 $41,282 $536,851 
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other26,286 623 3,076 (1,418)28,567 
Balance at December 31, 2020448,748 18,710 58,096 39,864 565,418 
    Divestitures(a)
— — — (1,473)(1,473)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(20,369)(827)(783)(1,686)(23,665)
Balance at December 31, 2021$428,379 $17,883 $57,313 $36,705 $540,280 
Accumulated Amortization
Balance at December 31, 2019$(116,749)$(7,938)$(36,197)$(21,345)$(182,229)
Amortization(22,575)— (1,377)(970)(24,922)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(7,962)(238)(1,926)964 (9,162)
Balance at December 31, 2020(147,286)(8,176)(39,500)(21,351)(216,313)
Amortization(22,982)— (1,461)(891)(25,334)
    Divestitures(a)
— — — 1,457 1,457 
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other6,985 193 1,165 514 8,857 
Balance at December 31, 2021$(163,283)$(7,983)$(39,796)$(20,271)$(231,333)
Net Book Value at December 31, 2020$301,462 $10,534 $18,596 $18,513 $349,105 
Net Book Value at December 31, 2021$265,096 $9,900 $17,517 $16,434 $308,947 

 Customer Lists and Relationships 
Trade Names and Trademarks(a)
 Patents and Technology Other Total
Gross Asset Value         
Balance at December 31, 2017$439,312
 $18,981
 $61,618
 $37,256
 $557,167
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(10,940) (528) (5,817) 6,452
 (10,833)
Balance at December 31, 2018428,372
 18,453
 55,801
 43,708
 546,334
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(5,910) (366) (781) (2,426) (9,483)
Balance at December 31, 2019$422,462
 $18,087
 $55,020
 $41,282
 $536,851
Accumulated Amortization         
Balance at December 31, 2017$(74,704) $(8,295) $(35,203) $(17,462) $(135,664)
Amortization(23,402) 
 (1,450) (3,127) (27,979)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other2,309
 119
 1,405
 (381) 3,452
Balance at December 31, 2018(95,797) (8,176) (35,248) (20,970) (160,191)
Amortization(23,020) 
 (1,388) (2,714) (27,122)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other2,068
 238
 439
 2,339
 5,084
Balance at December 31, 2019$(116,749) $(7,938) $(36,197) $(21,345) $(182,229)
Net Book Value at December 31, 2018$332,575
 $10,277
 $20,553
 $22,738
 $386,143
Net Book Value at December 31, 2019$305,713
 $10,149
 $18,823
 $19,937
 $354,622
(a)Represents other intangibles of the FCS business. See Note 3, “Divestitures,” for additional information.

(b)Net Book Value includes only indefinite-lived intangible assets.
(a)Net Book Value includes only indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Useful lives range from 13 – 25 years for customer lists and relationships; 8 – 20 years for patents and technology; and primarily 5 – 25 years for other.
Amortization of other intangibles amounted to $27.1$25.3 million, $28.0$24.9 million and $25.1$27.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively. Included in amortization for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017 is $19.5$19.3 million, $19.7$19.1 million and $17.7$19.5 million, respectively, of amortization using the pattern of economic benefit method.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Total estimated amortization expense of other intangibles for the next five fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):
Estimated Amortization Expense
2022$24,365 
2023$23,797 
2024$23,201 
2025$22,479 
2026$21,958 
 Estimated Amortization Expense
2020$25,356
2021$24,747
2022$24,153
2023$23,586
2024$22,787


96

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




NOTE 13—Accrued Expenses:
Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Employee benefits, payroll and related taxes$100,718 $102,711 
Settlement for legacy Rockwood legal matter(a)
332,500 — 
Wodgina Project acquisition consideration obligation(b)
132,400 137,092 
Other(c)
197,675 200,960 
Total$763,293 $440,763 
(a)Remaining balance to be paid to Huntsman for settlement of a legacy Rockwood legal dispute prior to the acquisition of Rockwood in 2015. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for further details.
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Employee benefits, payroll and related taxes$82,028
 $77,814
Wodgina Project acquisition consideration obligation(a)
260,686
 
Other(b)
210,446
 179,509
Total$553,160
 $257,323
(b)Represents the 40% interest in the Kemerton assets, which are under construction, expected to be transferred to MRL in the next twelve months as part of the consideration paid for the Wodgina Project acquisition. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for further details.
(c)Other accrued expenses represent balances such as operating lease liabilities, environmental reserves, asset retirement obligations, pension obligations, interest, utilities, other taxes, among other liabilities, expected to be paid within the next 12 months. No individual component exceeds 5% of total current liabilities.

(a)Represents the 40% interest in the Kemerton assets, which are under construction, expected to be transferred to MRL in the next twelve months as part of the consideration paid for the Wodgina Project acquisition, as well as the $64.8 million of stamp duties levied on the assets purchased. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for further details.
(b)No individual component exceeds 5% of total current liabilities.

NOTE 14—Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
 December 31,
 2019 2018
1.125% notes, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $5,659 at December 31, 2019$549,241
 $
1.625% notes, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $5,696 at December 31, 2019549,204
 
1.875% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $1,831 at December 31, 2019 and $2,841 at December 31, 2018434,241
 444,155
3.45% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $3,533 at December 31, 2019296,467
 
4.15% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $2,398 at December 31, 2019 and $2,884 at December 31, 2018422,603
 422,116
4.50% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $589 at December 31, 2018
 174,626
5.45% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $3,850 at December 31, 2019 and $4,004 at December 31, 2018346,150
 345,996
Floating rate notes, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $1,169 at December 31, 2019198,831
 
Commercial paper notes186,700
 306,606
Variable-rate foreign bank loans7,296
 7,216
Finance lease obligations59,524
 4,495
Total long-term debt3,050,257
 1,705,210
Less amounts due within one year187,336
 307,294
Long-term debt, less current portion$2,862,921
 $1,397,916

December 31,
20212020
1.125% notes due 2025$426,571 $610,800 
1.625% notes due 2028565,550 610,800 
1.875% Senior notes due 2021— 480,007 
3.45% Senior notes due 2029171,612 300,000 
4.15% Senior notes due 2024425,000 425,000 
5.45% Senior notes due 2044350,000 350,000 
Floating rate notes— 200,000 
Credit facilities— 223,900 
Commercial paper notes388,500 325,000 
Variable-rate foreign bank loans5,226 7,702 
Finance lease obligations75,431 59,181 
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs(13,651)(20,332)
Total long-term debt2,394,239 3,572,058 
Less amounts due within one year389,920 804,677 
Long-term debt, less current portion$2,004,319 $2,767,381 
Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 20192021 are as follows (in millions): 2020—$187.3; 2021—$436.1; 2022—$200.0;389.9; 2023—$0.0; 2024—$425.0; 2025—$426.6; 2026—$0.0; thereafter—$1,826.0.1,166.4.
In the first quarter of 2021, the Company made the following debt principal payments using proceeds from the February 2021 underwritten public offering of common stock:
€123.8 million of the 1.125% notes due in November 2025
€393.0 million, the remaining balance, of the 1.875% Senior notes originally due in December 2021
$128.4 million of the 3.45% Senior notes due in November 2029
$200.0 million, the remaining balance, of the floating rate notes originally due in November 2022
€183.3 million, the outstanding balance, of the unsecured credit facility originally entered into on August 14, 2019, as amended and restated on December 15, 2020
97

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






$325.0 million, the outstanding balance, of the commercial paper notes
As a result, included in Interest and financing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 is a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $29.0 million representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of this debt.
2019 Notes
On November 25, 2019, we issued a series of notes (collectively, the “2019 Notes”) as follows:
$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes, bearing interest at a floating rate, payable quarterly on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15which were fully repaid in the first quarter of each year, beginning in 2020 (“Floating Rate Notes”), with the interest rate reset on each interest payment date. Borrowings under these notes bear interest at a floating rate based on the 3-month London inter-bank offered rate (“LIBOR”) plus 105 basis points. The floating interest rate for the initial interest period is 2.9595%. These notes mature on November 15, 2022.2021, as noted above.
€500.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes, bearing interest at a rate of 1.125% payable annually on November 25 of each year, beginning in 2020. The effective interest rate on these notes is approximately 1.30%. These notes mature on November 25, 2025. These notes were partially repaid in the first quarter of 2021, as noted above.
€500.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes, bearing interest at a rate of 1.625% payable annually on November 25 of each year, beginning in 2020. The effective interest rate on these notes is approximately 1.74%. These notes mature on November 25, 2028.
$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, bearing interest at a rate of 3.45% payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning in 2020. The effective interest rate on these senior notes is approximately 3.58%. These senior notes mature on November 15, 2029. These notes were partially repaid in the first quarter of 2021, as noted above.
The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2019 Notes were used to repay the $1.0 billion balance of the 2019 Credit Facility (see below for further details), a large portion of approximately $370 million of commercial paper notes, the remaining balance of $175.2 million of the senior notes issued on December 10, 2010 (“2010 Senior Notes”), and for general corporate purposes. The 2010 Senior Notes were originally due to mature on December 15, 2020 and bore interest at a rate of 4.50%. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million in Interest and financing expenses, representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of the 2010 Senior Notes.
2014 Senior Notes
We currently have the following senior notes outstanding, initially issued in the fourth quarter of 2014:
€393.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, issued on December 8, 2014, bearing interest at a rate of 1.875% payable annually on December 8 of each year, beginning in 2015. The effective interest rate on these senior notes is approximately 2.10%. These senior notes mature on December 8, 2021.
$425.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, issued on November 24, 2014, bearing interest at a rate of 4.15% payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning June 1, 2015. The effective interest rate on these senior notes is approximately 5.06%. These senior notes mature on December 1, 2024.
$350.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, issued on November 24, 2014, bearing interest at a rate of 5.45% payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning June 1, 2015. The effective interest rate on these senior notes is approximately 5.50%. These senior notes mature on December 1, 2044.
On January 22, 2014, we entered into a pay fixed, receive variable rate forward starting interest rate swap, with a notional amount of $325.0 million, with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., to be effective October 15, 2014. Our risk management objective and strategy for undertaking this hedge was to eliminate the variability in the interest rate and partial credit spread on the 20 future semi-annual coupon payments that we will pay in connection with our 4.15% senior notes. On October 15, 2014, the swap was settled, resulting in a payment to the counterparty of $33.4 million. This amount was recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and is being amortized to interest expense over the life of the 4.15% senior notes. The amount to be reclassified to interest expense from Accumulated other comprehensive loss during the next twelve months is approximately $3.3 million.
On December 18, 2014,Prior to repayment in the first quarter of 2021, the carrying value of the 1.875% Euro-denominated senior notes was designated as an effective hedge of our net investment in certain foreign subsidiaries where the Euro serves as the functional currency, and beginning on the date of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of these senior notes to our reporting currency have been and will bewere recorded in Accumulatedaccumulated other comprehensive loss. DuringUpon repayment of these notes, this net investment hedge was discontinued. The balance of foreign exchange revaluation gains and losses associated with this discontinued net investment hedge will remain within accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged net investment is sold or liquidated. Prior to the net investment hedge being discontinued, we recorded a gain of $5.1 million (net of income taxes) in 2021, and during the years ended December 31, 2020
98

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




and 2019, 2018 and 2017,(losses) gains (losses) of $8.4 million, $25.8($34.2) million and ($41.8)$8.4 million (net of income taxes), respectively, were recorded in Accumulatedaccumulated other comprehensive loss in connection with the revaluation of these senior notes to our reporting currency.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





loss.
Credit Agreements
Our revolving, unsecured credit agreement dated as of June 21, 2018, as amended on August 14, 2019 and further amended on May 11, 2020 (the “2018 Credit Agreement”), currently provides for borrowings of up to $1.0 billion and matures on August 9, 2024. Borrowings under the 2018 Credit Agreement bear interest at variable rates based on an average LIBOR for deposits in the relevant currency plus an applicable margin which ranges from 0.910% to 1.500%, depending on the Company’s credit rating from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services LLC (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”). The applicable margin on the facility was 1.125% as of December 31, 2019.2021. There were no0 borrowings outstanding under the 2018 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2019.2021.
On August 14, 2019, the Company entered into a $1.2 billionan unsecured credit facility (the “2019 Credit Facility”) with several banks and other financial institutions.institutions, which was amended and restated on December 15, 2020 and again on December 10, 2021. The lenders’ commitment to provide new loans under the amended 2019 Credit Facility permits up to four borrowings by the Company in an aggregate amount equal to $750 million. The 2019 Credit Facility terminates on August 11, 2020,December 9, 2022, with each such loan maturing one year364 days after the funding of such loan. The Company can request that the maturity date of loans be extended for an additionala period of up to four additional years, but any such extension is subject to the approval of the lenders. BorrowingsAt the option of the Company the borrowings under the 2019 Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates based on an averageon either the base rate or LIBOR for deposits in the relevant currencyU.S. dollars, in each case plus an applicable margin which ranges from 0.000% to 0.375% for base rate borrowings or 0.875% to 1.625%,1.375% for LIBOR borrowings, depending on the Company’s credit rating from S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. The applicable margin on the credit facility was 1.125% as of December 31, 2019. In October 2019, we borrowed $1.0 billion under this credit facility to fund the cash portion of the October 31, 2019 acquisition of a 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project and for general corporate purposes and as noted above, such amount was repaid in full in November 2019. Following the repayment of the amounts borrowed, the Company had $200 million remaining to borrow under this credit facility.2021. There were 0 borrowings outstanding under the 2019 Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019.2021.
In addition, on August 14, 2019, the Company entered into an amendment to its existing credit agreement, dated as of June 21, 2018 to (a) extend the maturity date to August 9, 2024 (subject to the Company’s right to request that such maturity date be further extended for an additional one-year period), and (b) conform certain representations, warranties and covenants to thoseBorrowings under the 2019 Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the 2019 Credit Facility and 2018 Credit Agreement (together “the Creditthe “Credit Agreements”) are conditioned upon satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including the absence of defaults. The Company is subject to one financial covenant, as well as customary affirmative and negative covenants. The financial covenant requires that the Company’s consolidated net funded debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio (as such terms are defined in the Credit Agreements) to be less than or equal to 4.00:1 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2021 and 3.50:1.00,1 for fiscal quarters thereafter, subject to adjustments in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreements relating to a consummation of an acquisition where the consideration includes cash proceeds from issuance of funded debt in excess of $500 million. The Credit Agreements also contain customary default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants and cross-defaults to other material indebtedness. The occurrence of an event of default under the Credit Agreements could result in all loans and other obligations becoming immediately due and payable and the credit facilityeach such Credit Agreement being terminated. Certain representations, warranties and covenants under the 2018 Credit Agreement were conformed to those under the 2019 Credit Facility following the amendments to those agreements.
Commercial Paper Notes
On May 29, 2013, we entered into agreements to initiate a commercial paper program on a private placement basis under which we may issue unsecured commercial paper notes (the “Commercial Paper Notes”) from time-to-time up to a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time of $750.0 million. The proceeds from the issuance of the Commercial Paper Notes are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of other debt of the Company. The Credit Agreements are available to repay the Commercial Paper Notes, if necessary. Aggregate borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreements and the Commercial Paper Notes will not exceed the $1.2$1.75 billion current maximum amount available under the Credit Agreements. The Commercial Paper Notes will be sold at a discount from par, or alternatively, will be sold at par and bear interest at rates that will vary based upon market conditions at the time of issuance. The maturities of the Commercial Paper Notes will vary but may not exceed 397 days from the date of issue. The definitive documents relating to the commercial paper program contain customary representations, warranties, default and indemnification provisions. At December 31, 2019,2021, we had $186.7$388.5 million of Commercial Paper Notes outstanding bearing a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 2.01%0.46% and a weighted-average maturity of 3920 days.
Other
We have additional uncommitted credit lines with various U.S. and foreign financial institutions that provide for borrowings of up to approximately $307$239.2 million at December 31, 2019.2021. Outstanding borrowings under these agreements were
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





$7.3 $5.2 million and $7.2$7.7 million at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. The average interest rate on borrowings under these agreements during 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 was approximately 0.36%, 0.69% and 1.26%, respectively..
99

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




At December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, we had the ability and intent to refinance our borrowings under our other existing credit lines with borrowings under the Credit Agreements. Therefore, the amounts outstanding under those credit lines, if any, are classified as long-term debt at December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020. At December 31, 2019,2021, we had the ability to borrow $1.01$1.36 billion under our commercial paper program and the Credit Agreements.
We believe that as of December 31, 2019,2021, we were, and currently are, in compliance with all of our debt covenants.

NOTE 15—Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits:
We maintain various noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees, primarily in the U.S., the U.K., Germany and Japan. We also have a contributory defined benefit plan covering certain Belgian employees. The benefits for these plans are based primarily on compensation and/or years of service. Our U.S. and U.K. defined benefit plans for non-represented employees are closed to new participants, with no additional benefits accruing under these plans as participants’ accrued benefits have been frozen. The funding policy for each plan complies with the requirements of relevant governmental laws and regulations. The pension information for all periods presented includes amounts related to salaried and hourly plans.
The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status, as well as a summary of significant assumptions, for our defined benefit pension plans (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, 2019 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans
Change in benefit obligations:       
Benefit obligation at January 1$635,866
 $240,303
 $685,963
 $275,006
Service cost730
 3,680
 1,043
 3,919
Interest cost28,199
 4,998
 26,804
 5,144
Plan amendments
 
 
 233
Actuarial loss (gain)56,108
 21,588
 (36,844) (17,885)
Benefits paid(42,183) (10,088) (41,100) (9,974)
Employee contributions
 133
 
 182
Foreign exchange gain
 (1,772) 
 (12,632)
Settlements/curtailments
 (398) 
 (3,628)
Other
 (70) 
 (62)
Benefit obligation at December 31$678,720
 $258,374
 $635,866
 $240,303
        
Change in plan assets:       
Fair value of plan assets at January 1$513,075
 $70,584
 $580,396
 $79,478
Actual return on plan assets82,926
 9,417
 (28,457) (1,593)
Employer contributions2,865
 10,572
 2,236
 10,700
Benefits paid(42,183) (10,088) (41,100) (9,974)
Employee contributions
 133
 
 182
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
 1,316
 
 (4,519)
Settlements/curtailments
 (398) 
 (3,628)
Other
 (70) 
 (62)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31$556,683
 $81,466
 $513,075
 $70,584
        
Funded status at December 31$(122,037) $(176,908) $(122,791) $(169,719)

Year Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2020
U.S. Pension PlansForeign Pension PlansU.S. Pension PlansForeign Pension Plans
Change in benefit obligations:
Benefit obligation at January 1$740,951 $290,385 $678,720 $258,374 
Service cost869 3,697 849 4,000 
Interest cost18,005 2,427 23,402 3,357 
Plan amendments— — — 593 
Actuarial loss(24,576)(14,769)79,780 19,571 
Benefits paid(54,553)(10,451)(41,800)(9,905)
Employee contributions— 78 — 101 
Foreign exchange loss (gain)— (14,080)— 19,858 
Settlements/curtailments— (1,998)— (5,866)
Other— (55)— 302 
Benefit obligation at December 31$680,696 $255,234 $740,951 $290,385 
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1$594,228 $89,241 $556,683 $81,466 
Actual return on plan assets50,256 7,305 75,715 8,173 
Employer contributions16,060 11,550 3,630 9,653 
Benefits paid(54,553)(10,451)(41,800)(9,905)
Employee contributions— 78 — 101 
Foreign exchange gain— (1,419)— 4,110 
Settlements/curtailments— (1,998)— (4,279)
Other— (50)— (78)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31$605,991 $94,256 $594,228 $89,241 
Funded status at December 31$(74,705)$(160,978)$(146,723)$(201,144)

100

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets:       
Current liabilities (accrued expenses)$(1,224) $(5,648) $(1,342) $(5,772)
Noncurrent liabilities (pension benefits)(120,813) (171,260) (121,449) (163,947)
Net pension liability$(122,037) $(176,908) $(122,791) $(169,719)
        
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income:       
Prior service benefit$
 $224
 $
 $(409)
Net amount recognized$
 $224
 $
 $(409)
        
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:       
Discount rate3.56% 1.33% 4.59% 2.15%
Rate of compensation increase% 3.72% % 3.63%

December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
U.S. Pension PlansForeign Pension PlansU.S. Pension PlansForeign Pension Plans
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets:
Current liabilities (accrued expenses)$(525)$(5,972)$(1,217)$(5,832)
Noncurrent liabilities (pension benefits)(74,180)(155,006)(145,506)(195,312)
Net pension liability$(74,705)$(160,978)$(146,723)$(201,144)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income:
Prior service benefit$— $(773)$— $(433)
Net amount recognized$— $(773)$— $(433)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:
Discount rate2.86 %1.44 %2.50 %0.86 %
Rate of compensation increase— %3.20 %— %3.82 %
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $927.6$928.8 million and $867.4 million$1.02 billion at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
Postretirement medical benefits and life insurance is provided for certain groups of U.S. retired employees. Medical and life insurance benefit costs have been funded principally on a pay-as-you-go basis. Although the availability of medical coverage after retirement varies for different groups of employees, the majority of employees who retire before becoming eligible for Medicare can continue group coverage by paying a portion of the cost of a monthly premium designed to cover the claims incurred by retired employees subject to a cap on payments allowed. The availability of group coverage for Medicare-eligible retirees also varies by employee group with coverage designed either to supplement or coordinate with Medicare. Retirees generally pay a portion of the cost of the coverage. Plan assets for retiree life insurance are held under an insurance contract and are reserved for retiree life insurance benefits. In 2005, the postretirement medical benefit available to U.S. employees was changed to provide that employees who are under age 50 as of December 31, 2005 would no longer be eligible for a company-paid retiree medical premium subsidy. Employees who are of age 50 and above as of December 31, 2005 and who retire after January 1, 2006 will have their retiree medical premium subsidy capped. Effective January 1, 2008, our medical insurance for certain groups of U.S. retired employees is now insured through a medical carrier.

101

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status, as well as a summary of significant assumptions, for our postretirement benefit plans (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Other Postretirement BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
Change in benefit obligations:
Benefit obligation at January 1$51,343 $55,089 
Service cost123 105 
Interest cost1,238 1,871 
Actuarial (gain) loss(2,568)(2,571)
Benefits paid(2,643)(3,151)
Benefit obligation at December 31$47,493 $51,343 
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1$— $— 
Employer contributions2,643 3,151 
Benefits paid(2,643)(3,151)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31$— $— 
Funded status at December 31$(47,493)$(51,343)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
 Other Postretirement Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
Change in benefit obligations:   
Benefit obligation at January 1$50,390
 $56,647
Service cost98
 117
Interest cost2,197
 2,168
Actuarial loss (gain)5,445
 (5,661)
Benefits paid(3,041) (2,881)
Benefit obligation at December 31$55,089
 $50,390
    
Change in plan assets:   
Fair value of plan assets at January 1$
 $834
Actual return on plan assets
 (253)
Employer contributions3,041
 2,300
Benefits paid(3,041) (2,881)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31$
 $
    
Funded status at December 31$(55,089) $(50,390)


December 31,
20212020
Other Postretirement BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets:
Current liabilities (accrued expenses)$(3,800)$(3,268)
Noncurrent liabilities (postretirement benefits)(43,693)(48,075)
Net postretirement liability$(47,493)$(51,343)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:
Discount rate2.85 %2.49 %
Rate of compensation increase3.50 %3.50 %

 December 31,
 2019 2018
 Other Postretirement Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets:   
Current liabilities (accrued expenses)$(4,190) $(4,233)
Noncurrent liabilities (postretirement benefits)(50,899) (46,157)
Net postretirement liability$(55,089) $(50,390)
    
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:   
Discount rate3.53% 4.55%
Rate of compensation increase3.50% 3.50%

102

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






The components of pension benefits cost (credit) are as follows (in thousands):
Year EndedYear EndedYear Ended
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
U.S. Pension PlansForeign Pension PlansU.S. Pension PlansForeign Pension PlansU.S. Pension PlansForeign Pension Plans
Service cost$869 $3,697 $849 $4,000 $730 $3,680 
Interest cost18,005 2,427 23,402 3,357 28,199 4,998 
Expected return on assets(39,972)(3,593)(36,957)(3,274)(33,926)(3,837)
Actuarial loss (gain)(34,857)(19,494)40,653 14,189 7,106 16,784 
Amortization of prior service benefit— 115 — 36 — 37 
Total net pension benefits cost (credit)$(55,955)$(16,848)$27,947 $18,308 $2,109 $21,662 
Weighted-average assumption percentages:
Discount rate2.50 %0.86 %3.56 %1.33 %4.59 %2.15 %
Expected return on plan assets6.88 %3.98 %6.88 %4.07 %6.89 %5.51 %
Rate of compensation increase— %3.26 %— %3.72 %— %3.63 %
 Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans
Service cost$730
 $3,680
 $1,043
 $3,919
 $985
 $2,547
Interest cost28,199
 4,998
 26,804
 5,144
 28,614
 5,128
Expected return on assets(33,926) (3,837) (38,621) (4,204) (36,243) (4,441)
Actuarial loss (gain)7,106
 16,784
 30,234
 (10,833) (13,910) 483
Amortization of prior service benefit
 37
 60
 34
 75
 56
Total net pension benefits cost (credit)$2,109
 $21,662
 $19,520
 $(5,940) $(20,479) $3,773
            
Weighted-average assumption percentages:           
Discount rate4.59% 2.15% 4.03% 1.94% 4.43% 2.00%
Expected return on plan assets6.89% 5.51% 6.89% 5.52% 6.89% 6.16%
Rate of compensation increase% 3.63% % 3.18% % 3.18%


Effective January 1, 2020,2022, the weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets for the U.S. and foreign defined benefit pension plans is 6.88%6.89% and 4.07%3.85%, respectively.
The components of postretirement benefits cost (credit) are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Other Postretirement BenefitsOther Postretirement BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
Service cost$123 $105 $98 
Interest cost1,238 1,871 2,197 
Actuarial (gain) loss(2,568)(2,573)5,449 
Total net postretirement benefits (credit) cost$(1,207)$(597)$7,744 
Weighted-average assumption percentages:
Discount rate2.49 %3.53 %4.55 %
Rate of compensation increase3.50 %3.50 %3.50 %
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 Other Postretirement Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
Service cost$98
 $117
 $121
Interest cost2,197
 2,168
 2,340
Expected return on assets
 (7) (110)
Actuarial loss (gain)5,449
 (5,400) 2,014
Amortization of prior service benefit
 (48) (95)
Total net postretirement benefits cost (credit)$7,744
 $(3,170) $4,270
      
Weighted-average assumption percentages:     
Discount rate4.55% 3.99% 4.35%
Expected return on plan assets% 7.00% 7.00%
Rate of compensation increase3.50% 3.50% 3.50%


All components of net benefit cost (credit), other than service cost, are included in Other expenses, net on the consolidated statements of income.
The mark-to-market actuarial lossgain in 20192021 is primarily attributable to a decreasehigher return on pension plan assets in 2021 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S. and foreign pension plan assets was 8.42% versus an expected return of 6.50%. In addition, there was an increase in the weighted-average discount rate to 3.56%2.86% from 4.59%2.50% for our U.S. pension plans and to 1.33%1.44% from 2.15%0.86% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 20192021 measurement date.
The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2020 is primarily attributable to a decrease in the weighted-average discount rate to 2.50% from 3.56% for our U.S. pension plans and to 0.86% from 1.33% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2020 measurement date. This was partially offset by a higher return on pension plan assets in 2019 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S. and foreign pension plan assets was 15.82%13.15% versus an expected return of 6.72%6.52%.
The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 20182019 is primarily attributable to a lower return on pension plan assets in 2018 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S. and foreign pension plan assets was (4.55)% versus an expected return of 6.73%. The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2018 was partially offset by an increase decrease in the weighted-average discount rate to 4.59%3.56% from 4.03%4.59% for our U.S. pension plans
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





and to 2.15%1.33% from 1.94%2.15% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 20182019 measurement date.
The mark-to-market actuarial gain in 2017 is primarily attributable to This was partially offset by a higher return on pension plan assets in 20172019 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return
103

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




on our U.S. and foreign pension plan assets was 14.31%15.82% versus an expected return of 6.73%6.72%. The mark-to-market actuarial gainloss in 20172019 was partially offset by a decrease in the weighted-average discount rate to 4.03% from 4.43% for our U.S. pension plans and to 1.94% from 2.00% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2017 measurement date.an increase
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into the following hierarchy:
Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
Level 3Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the closing price on the last business day of the year. Listed securities for which no sale was reported on such date are valued at the mean between the last reported bid and asked price. Securities traded in the over-the-counter market are valued at the closing price on the last business day of the year or at bid price. The net asset value of shares or units is based on the quoted market value of the underlying assets. The market value of corporate bonds is based on institutional trading lots and is most often reflective of bid price. Government securities are valued at the mean between bid and ask prices. Holdings in private equity securities are typically valued using the net asset valuations provided by the underlying private investment companies.
The following tables set forth the assets of our pension and postretirement plans that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31, 2021Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1)Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Similar Items (Level 2)Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Pension Assets:
Domestic Equity(a)
$129,946 $129,139 $807 $— 
International Equity(b)
128,353 103,554 24,799 — 
Fixed Income(c)
345,635 290,177 55,458 — 
Absolute Return Measured at Net Asset Value(d)
96,313 — — — 
Total Pension Assets$700,247 $522,870 $81,064 $— 
December 31, 2020Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1)Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Similar Items (Level 2)Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Pension Assets:
Domestic Equity(a)
$142,280 $140,548 $1,732 $— 
International Equity(b)
139,611 113,174 26,437 — 
Fixed Income(c)
319,998 270,589 49,409 — 
Absolute Return Measured at Net Asset Value(d)
78,787 — — — 
Cash2,793 2,793 — — 
Total Pension Assets$683,469 $527,104 $77,578 $— 
 December 31, 2019 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Similar Items (Level 2) Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Pension Assets:       
Domestic Equity(a)
$119,842
 $118,255
 $1,587
 $
International Equity(b)
126,828
 95,246
 31,582
 
Fixed Income(c)
317,667
 279,731
 37,936
 
Absolute Return Measured at Net Asset Value(d)
73,777
 
 
 
Cash35
 35
 
 
Total Pension Assets$638,149
 $493,267
 $71,105
 $
(a)Consists primarily of U.S. stock funds that track or are actively managed and measured against the S&P 500 index.

(b)
Consists primarily of international equity funds which invest in common stocks and other securities whose value is based on an international equity index or an underlying equity security or basket of equity securities.
(c)Consists primarily of debt obligations issued by governments, corporations, municipalities and other borrowers. Also includes insurance policies.
(d)Consists primarily of funds with holdings in private investment companies. See additional information about the Absolute Return investments below. Holdings in private investment companies are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share as a practical expedient and have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts of $96.3 million and $78.8 million as of
104
 December 31, 2018 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Similar Items (Level 2) Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Pension Assets:       
Domestic Equity(a)
$113,355
 $111,665
 $1,690
 $
International Equity(b)
114,554
 90,651
 23,903
 
Fixed Income(c)
254,437
 219,124
 35,313
 
Absolute Return Measured at Net Asset Value(d)
71,987
 
 
 
Cash29,326
 29,326
 
 
Total Pension Assets$583,659
 $450,766
 $60,906
 $

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, are included in this table to permit reconciliation to the reconciliation of plan assets table above.
(a)Consists primarily of U.S. stock funds that track or are actively managed and measured against the S&P 500 index.
(b)Consists primarily of international equity funds which invest in common stocks and other securities whose value is based on an international equity index or an underlying equity security or basket of equity securities.
(c)Consists primarily of debt obligations issued by governments, corporations, municipalities and other borrowers. Also includes insurance policies.
(d)Consists primarily of funds with holdings in private investment companies. See additional information about the Absolute Return investments below. Holdings in private investment companies are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share as a practical expedient and have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts of $73.8 million and $72.0 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, are included in this table to permit reconciliation to the reconciliation of plan assets table above.
The Company’s pension plan assets in the U.S. and U.K. represent approximately 97%98% of the total pension plan assets. The investment objective of these pension plan assets is to achieve solid returns while preserving capital to meet current plan cash flow requirements. Assets should participate in rising markets, with defensive action in declining markets expected to an even greater degree. Depending on market conditions, the broad asset class targets may range up or down by approximately 10%. These asset classes include but are not limited to hedge fund of funds, bonds and other fixed income vehicles, high yield fixed income securities, equities and distressed debt. At December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, equity securities held by our pension and OPEB plans did not include direct ownership of Albemarle common stock.
The weighted-average target allocations as of the measurement date are as follows:
Target Allocation
Equity securities4241 %
Fixed income4950 %
Absolute return9%

Our Absolute Return investments consist primarily of our investments in hedge fund of funds. These are holdings in private investment companies with fair values that are based on significant unobservable inputs including assumptions where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. Investment managers or fund managers associated with these investments provide valuations of the investments on a monthly basis utilizing the net asset valuation approach for determining fair values. These valuations are reviewed by the Company for reasonableness based on applicable sector, benchmark and company performance to validate the appropriateness of the net asset values as a fair value measurement. Where available, audited financial statements are obtained and reviewed for the investments as support for the manager’s investment valuation. In general, the investment objective of these funds is high risk-adjusted returns with an emphasis on preservation of capital. The investment strategies of each of the funds vary; however, the objective of our Absolute Return investments is complementary to the overall investment objective of our U.S. pension plan assets.
We made contributions to our defined benefit pension and OPEB plans of $16.5$30.3 million, $15.2$16.4 million and $13.3$16.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively. We expect contributions to our domestic nonqualified and foreign qualified and nonqualified pension plans to approximate $13$11.9 million in 2020.2022. Also, we expect to pay approximately $4$3.3 million in premiums to our U.S. postretirement benefit plan in 2020.2022. However, we may choose to make additional voluntary pension contributions in excess of these amounts.
The current forecast of benefit payments, which reflects expected future service, amounts to (in millions):
 U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans Other Postretirement Benefits
2020$42.3
 $10.6
 $4.2
2021$47.8
 $10.0
 $4.0
2022$48.4
 $9.5
 $3.9
2023$48.9
 $12.3
 $3.9
2024$49.0
 $10.4
 $3.8
2025-2029$240.9
 $54.6
 $17.5

U.S. Pension PlansForeign Pension PlansOther Postretirement Benefits
2022$43.3 $10.9 $3.3 
2023$43.8 $12.0 $3.2 
2024$44.0 $10.8 $3.2 
2025$43.9 $10.5 $3.1 
2026$43.6 $10.8 $3.1 
2026-2030$206.2 $55.6 $14.4 
We have a supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”), which provides unfunded supplemental retirement benefits to certain management or highly compensated employees. The SERP provides for incremental pension benefits to offset the
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





limitations imposed on qualified plan benefits by federal income tax regulations. Costs (credits)(Credits) costs relating to our SERP were ($0.2) million, $3.8 million and $2.2 million($0.8) million and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively. The projected benefit obligation for the SERP recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 was $21.3$8.7 million and $21.9$23.1 million, respectively. The benefit expenses and obligations of this SERP are included in the tables above. Benefits of $1.2$1.0 million are expected to be paid to SERP retirees in 2020.2022. On October 1, 2012, our Board of Directors approved amendments to the SERP, such that effective December 31, 2014, no additional benefits shall accrue under this plan and participants’ accrued benefits shall be frozen as of that date to reflect the same changes as were made under the U.S. qualified defined benefit plan.
105

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




At December 31, 2019,2021, the assumed rate of increase in the pre-65 and post-65 per capita cost of covered health care benefits for U.S. retirees was zero as the employer-paid premium caps (pre-65 and post-65) were met starting January 1, 2013.
Defined Contribution Plans
On March 31, 2004, a new defined contribution pension plan benefit was adopted under the qualified defined contribution plan for U.S. non-represented employees hired after March 31, 2004. On October 1, 2012 our Board of Directors approved certain plan amendments, such that effective January 1, 2013, the defined contribution pension plan benefit is expanded to include non-represented employees hired prior to March 31, 2004, and revised the contribution for all participants to be based on 5% of eligible employee compensation. The employer portion of contributions to our U.S. defined contribution pension plan amounted to $16.7 million, $6.9 million, and $11.5 million $11.8 million,in 2021, 2020 and $10.3 million2019, respectively. Contributions in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.2021 included amounts deferred from 2020 as a result of the Company’s plan to maintain financial flexibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Certain of our employees participate in our defined contribution 401(k) employee savings plan, which is generally available to all U.S. full-time salaried and non-union hourly employees and to employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that provides for such participation. This U.S. defined contribution plan is funded with contributions made by the participants and us. Our contributions to the 401(k) plan amounted to $17.4 million, $7.5 million and $12.6 million $12.7 millionin 2021, 2020 and $11.3 million2019, respectively. Contributions in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.2021 included amounts deferred from 2020 as a result of the Company’s plan to maintain financial flexibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In 2006, we formalized a new plan in the Netherlands, similar tocertain employees participate in a collective defined contribution plan. The collective defined contributionpension plan is supported by annuity contracts through ana Dutch insurance company. The insurance company unconditionally undertakes the legal obligation to provide specific benefits to specific individuals in return for a fixed amount of premiums. Our obligation under this plan is limited to a variable calculated employer match for each participant plus, an additional fixed amount of contributions to assist in covering estimated cost of living and salary increases (indexing)as well as risk premiums and administrative costs for the overall plan. We paid approximately $9.2 million, $9.9 million and $9.7 million $10.2 millionin 2021, 2020 and $9.9 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, in annual premiums and related costs pertaining to this plan.
Multiemployer Plan
Certain current and former employees participate in a multiemployer plan in Germany, the Pensionskasse Dynamit Nobel Versicherungsverein auf Gegenseitigkeit, Troisdorf (“DN Pensionskasse”) that provides monthly payments in the case of disability, death or retirement. The risks of participating in a multiemployer plan are different from single-employer plans in the following ways: (a) assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers, and (b) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan due to financial inability to provide funding, the unfunded obligation of the plan may be borne by remaining participating employers.
Some participants in the plan are subject to collective bargaining arrangements, which have no fixed expiration date. The contribution and benefit levels are not negotiated or significantly influenced by these collective bargaining arrangements. Also, the benefit levels generally are not subject to reduction. Under German insurance law, the DN Pensionskasse must be fully funded at all times. The DN Pensionskasse was fully funded as of December 31, 2018,2019, the date of the most recently available information for the plan. This funding level would correspond to the highest funding zone status (at least 80% funded) under U.S. pension regulation. Since the plan liabilities need to be fully funded at all times according to local funding requirements, it is unlikely that the DN Pensionskasse plan will fail to fulfill its obligations, however, in such an event, the Company is liable for the benefits of its employees, and former employees of certain divested businesses, who participate in the plan. Additional information of the DN Pensionskasse is available in the public domain.
The majority of the Company’s contributions are tied to employees’ contributions, which are generally calculated as a percentage of base compensation, up to a certain statutory ceiling. Our normal contributions to this plan were approximately $1.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.4 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, and $1.5 million in 2018 and 2017.respectively. The Company’s contributions represented more than 5% of total contributions to the DN Pensionskasse in 2019.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





2021.
Effective July 1, 2016, the DN Pensionskasse is subject to a financial improvement plan which expires on December 31, 2022, with the final contribution in the second quarter of 2023. This financial improvement plan calls for increased capital reserves to avoid future underfunding risk. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, we made contributions for our employees covered under this plan of approximately $1.8$1.3 million, $2.3$3.1 million and $3.3$1.8 million, respectively, recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a result of this financial improvement plan. The value of the additional funding required under the financial improvement plan each year is determined upon the completion of the annual financial
106

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




statements and are payable in the second quarter of the following year. A portion of the additional funding necessary for the year will be based on an estimate prepared on September 30 of each year and payable in the fourth quarter of that same year.

NOTE 16—Other Noncurrent Liabilities:
Other noncurrent liabilities consist of the following at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Transition tax on foreign earnings(a)
$234,180 $273,048 
Operating leases(b)
126,997 116,765 
Liabilities related to uncertain tax positions(c)
27,719 14,683 
Executive deferred compensation plan obligation32,491 32,447 
Environmental liabilities(d)
37,540 36,298 
Asset retirement obligations(d)
76,196 74,856 
Tax indemnification liability(e)
66,799 30,488 
Other(f)
61,776 50,792 
Total$663,698 $629,377 
(a)Noncurrent portion of one-time transition tax on foreign earnings. See Note 21, “Income Taxes,” for additional information.
(b)See Note 18, “Leases.”
(c)See Note 21, “Income Taxes.”
(d)See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies.”
(e)Indemnification of certain income and non-income tax liabilities primarily associated with the Chemetall Surface Treatment entities sold in 2017.
(f)No individual component exceeds 5% of total liabilities.
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Transition tax on foreign earnings(a)
$303,490
 $317,745
Wodgina Project acquisition consideration obligation(b)
120,800
 
Operating leases(c)
114,686
 
Liabilities related to uncertain tax positions(d)
21,169
 22,877
Executive deferred compensation plan obligation28,715
 26,292
Environmental liabilities(e)
33,058
 40,376
Asset retirement obligations(e)
55,848
 41,489
Tax indemnification liability(f)
30,993
 45,347
Other(g)
45,777
 32,816
Total$754,536
 $526,942
(a)Noncurrent portion of one-time transition tax on foreign earnings. See Note 21, “Income Taxes,” for additional information.
(b)Represents the 40% interest in the Kemerton assets, which are under construction, expected to be transferred to MRL as part of the consideration paid for the Wodgina Project acquisition. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for further details.
(c)See Note 18, “Leases.”
(d)See Note 21, “Income Taxes.”
(e)See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies.”
(f)Indemnification of certain income and non-income tax liabilities associated with the Chemetall Surface Treatment entities sold. The December 31, 2018 balance also includes the settlement of an ongoing audit of a previously disposed business in Germany.
(g)No individual component exceeds 5% of total liabilities.

NOTE 17—Commitments and Contingencies:
In the ordinary course of business, we have commitments in connection with various activities. We believe that amounts recorded are adequate for known items which might become due in the current year. The most significant commitments are as follows:
Environmental
We had the following activity in our recorded environmental liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017202120202019
Balance, beginning of year$49,569
 $39,808
 $34,919
Balance, beginning of year$45,771 $42,592 $49,569 
Expenditures(6,037) (6,885) (1,818)Expenditures(2,752)(3,290)(6,037)
Accretion of discount1,030
 1,283
 896
Accretion of discount960 925 1,030 
Additions and changes in estimates(a)
1,129
 17,039
 3,344
Additions and changes in estimatesAdditions and changes in estimates4,063 3,815 1,129 
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(3,099) (1,676) 2,467
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other(1,425)1,729 (3,099)
Balance, end of year42,592
 49,569
 39,808
Balance, end of year46,617 45,771 42,592 
Less amounts reported in Accrued expenses9,534
 9,193
 2,290
Less amounts reported in Accrued expenses9,077 9,473 9,534 
Amounts reported in Other noncurrent liabilities$33,058
 $40,376
 $37,518
Amounts reported in Other noncurrent liabilities$37,540 $36,298 $33,058 

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





(a)Increase in additions in 2018 primarily related to the indemnification of the buyer of a formerly owned site. As defined in the agreement of sale, this indemnification has a set cutoff date in 2024, at which point we will no longer be required to provide financial coverage.
Environmental remediation liabilities included discounted liabilities of $35.6$39.7 million and $40.4$39.2 million at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, discounted at rates with a weighted-average of 3.7%3.5%, with the undiscounted amount totaling $69.2$70.0 million and $74.5$73.6 million at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. For certain locations where the Company is operating groundwater monitoring and/or remediation systems, prior owners or insurers have assumed all or most of the responsibility.
The amounts recorded represent our future remediation and other anticipated environmental liabilities. These liabilities typically arise during the normal course of our operational and environmental management activities or at the time of acquisition of the site, and are based on internal analysis as well as input from outside consultants. As evaluations proceed at each relevant site, changes in risk assessment practices, remediation techniques and regulatory requirements can occur,
107

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




therefore such liability estimates may be adjusted accordingly. The timing and duration of remediation activities at these sites will be determined when evaluations are completed. Although it is difficult to quantify the potential financial impact of these remediation liabilities, management estimates (based on the latest available information) that there is a reasonable possibility that future environmental remediation costs associated with our past operations, could be an additional $10 million to $30$37 million before income taxes, in excess of amounts already recorded. The variability of this range is primarily driven by possible environmental remediation activity at a formerly owned site where we indemnify the buyer through a set cutoff date in 2024.
We believe that any sum we may be required to pay in connection with environmental remediation matters in excess of the amounts recorded would likely occur over a period of time and would likely not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows on a consolidated annual basis although any such sum could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows in a particular quarterly reporting period.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The following is a reconciliation of our beginning and ending asset retirement obligation balances for 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Balance, beginning of year$75,872 $60,246 
Acquisitions(a)
— 1,222 
Additions and changes in estimates(b)
4,832 15,750 
Accretion of discount2,098 2,531 
Liabilities settled(3,605)(3,980)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other16 103 
Balance, end of year$79,213 $75,872 
Less amounts reported in Accrued expenses3,017 1,016 
Amounts reported in Other noncurrent liabilities$76,196 $74,856 
(a)    Represents purchase price adjustments for the Wodgina Project acquisition recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
Balance, beginning of year$41,489
 $40,450
Acquisitions(a)
4,650
 
Additions and changes in estimates(b)
14,734
 740
Accretion of discount2,035
 1,500
Liabilities settled(3,289) (786)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other627
 (415)
Balance, end of year$60,246
 $41,489
Less amounts reported in Accrued expenses4,398
 
Amounts reported in Other noncurrent liabilities$55,848
 $41,489
(b)    Additions in 2021 primarily related to the updated of an estimate at a site formerly owned by Albemarle. 2020 additions related to new asset retirement obligations in Chile and Australia.

(a)Represents preliminary purchase price adjustments for the Wodgina Project acquisition recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.
(b)Increase in additions in 2019 related to $11.1 million of new asset retirement obligations in Chile and Australia and $3.6 million of charges related to the update of an estimate at a site formerly owned by Albemarle.
Asset retirement obligations primarily relate to post-closure reclamation of brine wells and sites involved in the surface mining and manufacturing of lithium. We are not aware of any conditional asset retirement obligations that would require recognition in our consolidated financial statements.
Litigation
We are involved from time to time in legal proceedings of types regarded as common in our business, including administrative or judicial proceedings seeking remediation under environmental laws, such as the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as CERCLA or Superfund, products liability, breach of contract liability and premises liability litigation. Where appropriate, we may establish financial reserves for such proceedings. We also maintain insurance to mitigate certain of such risks. Costs for legal services are generally expensed as incurred.
On February 6, 2017, Huntsman International LLC (“Huntsman”), a subsidiary of Huntsman Corporation, filed a lawsuit in New York state court against Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (“Rockwood”), Rockwood Specialties, Inc., certain former executives of Rockwood and its subsidiaries—Seifollah Ghasemi, Thomas Riordan, Andrew Ross, and Michael Valente, and Albemarle. The lawsuit arises out of Huntsman’s acquisition of certain Rockwood subsidiaries in connection with a stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”), dated September 17, 2013. Before that transaction closed on October 1, 2014, Albemarle began discussions with Rockwood to purchase all outstanding equity of Rockwood and did so in a transaction that closed on January 12, 2015. Huntsman’s complaint asserted that certain technology that Rockwood had developed for a production facility in Augusta, Georgia, and which was among the assets that Huntsman acquired pursuant to the SPA, did not work, and that Rockwood and the defendant executives had intentionally misled Huntsman about that technology in connection with the Huntsman-Rockwood transaction. The complaint asserted claims for, among other things, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of the SPA, and sought certain costs for completing construction of the production facility.
108

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






On March 10, 2017, Albemarle moved in New York state court to compel arbitration, which was granted on January 8, 2018 (although Huntsman unsuccessfully appealed that decision). Huntsman’s arbitration demand asserted claims substantially similar to those asserted in its state court complaint, and sought various forms of legal remedies, including cost overruns, compensatory damages, expectation damages, punitive damages, and restitution. After a trial, the arbitration panel issued an award on October 28, 2021, awarding approximately $600 million (including interest) to be paid by Albemarle to Huntsman, in addition to the possibility of attorney’s fees, costs and expenses. Following the arbitration panel decision, Albemarle reached a settlement with Huntsman to pay $665 million in two equal installments, with the first payment made in December 2021. As a result, the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2021, includes expense of $657.4 million ($508.5 million net of income tax), inclusive of legal fees incurred by Huntsman and other related obligations, to reflect the agreed upon resolution of this legal matter.
As previouslyIn addition, as first reported in 2018, following receipt of information regarding potential improper payments being made by third partythird-party sales representatives of our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, we promptly retained outside counsel and forensic accountants to investigate potential violations of the Company’s Code of Conduct, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, (“FCPA”), and other potentially applicable laws. Based on this internal investigation, we have voluntarily self-reported potential issues relating to the use of third partythird-party sales representatives in our Refining Solutions business, within our Catalysts segment, to the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”),SEC, and the Dutch Public Prosecutor (“DPP”), and are cooperating with the DOJ, the SEC, and the DPP in their review of these matters. In connection with our internal investigation, we have implemented, and are continuing to implement, appropriate remedial measures. We have commenced discussions with the SEC about a potential resolution.
At this time, we are unable to predict the duration, scope, result, or related costs associated with the investigations by the DOJ, the SEC, or DPP.investigations. We also are unable to predict what if any, action may be taken by the DOJ, the SEC, or the DPP, or what penalties or remedial actions they may seek to impose.ultimately seek. Any determination that our operations or activities are not, or were not, in compliance with existing laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses. We do not believe, however, that any such fines, penalties, disgorgement, equitable relief, or other losses would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or liquidity.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded However, an adverse resolution could have a chargematerial adverse effect on our results of $16.2 million in Other expenses, net resulting from a jury rendering a verdict against Albemarleoperations in a legal matter related to certain business concluded under a 2014 sales agreement for products that Albemarle no longer manufactures. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a charge of $10.8 million in Other expenses, net due to a settlement of a legal matter related to guarantees from a previously disposed business. Both matters were resolved and paid during the year ended December 31, 2018.particular period.
Indemnities
We are indemnified by third parties in connection with certain matters related to acquired and divested businesses. Although we believe that the financial condition of those parties who may have indemnification obligations to the Company is generally sound, in the event the Company seeks indemnity under any of these agreements or through other means, there can be no assurance that any party who may have obligations to indemnify us will adhere to their obligations and we may have to resort to legal action to enforce our rights under the indemnities.
The Company may be subject to indemnity claims relating to properties or businesses it divested, including properties or businesses of acquired businesses that were divested prior to the completion of the acquisition. In the opinion of management, and based upon information currently available, the ultimate resolution of any indemnification obligations owed to the Company or by the Company is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company had approximately $31.0$66.8 million and $45.3$30.5 million at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities primarily related to the indemnification of certain income and non-income tax liabilities associated with the Chemetall Surface Treatment entities sold. The balance atsold in 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018 also included2021, the settlement ofCompany recorded $39.4 million to revise this indemnification estimate for an ongoing audittax-related matter in Germany. A corresponding discrete tax benefit of a previously disposed business$27.9 million was recorded in Germany.Income tax expense during the same period, netting to an expected cash obligation of approximately $11.5 million..
Other
The Company has standby letters of credit and guarantees with various financial institutions. The following table summarizes our letters of credit and guarantee agreements (in thousands):
 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter
Letters of credit and other guarantees$49,152
 $11,383
 $1,303
 $1,190
 $
 $19,305

20222023202420252026Thereafter
Letters of credit and other guarantees$62,715 $7,127 $987 $68 $118 $10,154 
The outstanding letters of credit are primarily related to insurance claim payment guarantees. The majority of the Company’s other guarantees have terms of one year and mainly consist of performance and environmental guarantees, as well as guarantees to customs and port authorities. The guarantees arose during the ordinary course of business.
109

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




We do not have recorded reserves for the letters of credit and guarantees as of December 31, 2019.2021. We are unable to estimate the maximum amount of the potential future liability under guarantees and letters of credit. However, we accrue for any potential loss for which we believe a future payment is probable and a range of loss can be reasonably estimated. We believe our liability under such obligations is immaterial.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





We currently, and are from time to time, subject to transactional audits in various taxing jurisdictions and to customs audits globally. We do not expect the financial impact of any of these audits to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

NOTE 18—Leases:
We lease certain office space, buildings, transportation and equipment in various countries. The initial lease terms generally range from 1 to 30 years for real estate leases, and from 2 to 15 years for non-real estate leases. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet, and we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Many leases include options to terminate or renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from 1 to 50 years or more. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. Certain leases also include options to purchase the leased property. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
The following table provides details of our lease contracts for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and 2020 (in thousands):
 December 31, 2019
Operating lease cost$35,335
Finance lease cost: 
  Amortization of right of use assets625
  Interest on lease liabilities117
Total finance lease cost742
  
Short-term lease cost6,655
Variable lease cost6,198
Total lease cost$48,930

Rental expense was approximately $37.6 million and $31.2 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Operating lease cost$42,338 $33,904 
Finance lease cost:
  Amortization of right of use assets614 585 
  Interest on lease liabilities3,010 2,681 
Total finance lease cost3,624 3,266 
Short-term lease cost11,084 11,663 
Variable lease cost8,002 8,691 
Total lease cost$65,048 $57,524 
Supplemental cash flow information related to our lease contracts for the yearyears ended December 31, 20192021 and 2020 is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
  Operating cash flows from operating leases$33,030 $36,245 
  Operating cash flows from finance leases1,776 1,568 
  Financing cash flows from finance leases687 663 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:
  Operating leases56,814 29,581 
  Finance leases17,096 — 

110

 December 31, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: 
  Operating cash flows from operating leases$29,946
  Operating cash flows from finance leases117
  Financing cash flows from finance leases678
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: 
  Operating leases24,687
  Finance leases(a)
55,806
(a)Represents 60% ownership interest in finance lease acquired as part of the Wodgina Project acquisition. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for further details.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Supplemental balance sheet information related to our lease contracts, including the location on balance sheet, at December 31, 20192021 and 2020 is as follows (in thousands, except as noted):
 December 31, 2019
Operating leases: 
  Other assets$133,864
  
  Current operating lease liability23,137
  Other noncurrent liabilities114,686
  Total operating lease liabilities137,823
Finance leases: 
  Net property, plant and equipment59,494
  
  Current portion of long-term debt636
  Long-term debt58,888
  Total finance lease liabilities59,524
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years): 
  Operating leases11.4
  Finance leases28.3
Weighted average discount rate (%): 
  Operating leases3.84%
  Finance leases4.56%

December 31,
20212020
Operating leases:
  Other assets$154,741 $136,292 
  Accrued expenses31,603 22,297 
  Other noncurrent liabilities126,997 116,765 
  Total operating lease liabilities158,600 139,062 
Finance leases:
  Net property, plant and equipment75,302 58,963 
  Current portion of long-term debt(a)
3,768 1,752 
  Long-term debt74,011 58,543 
  Total finance lease liabilities77,779 60,295 
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years):
  Operating leases12.915.3
  Finance leases24.527.5
Weighted average discount rate (%):
  Operating leases3.44 %3.94 %
  Finance leases4.47 %4.56 %
(a) Balance includes accrued interest of finance lease.
Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 20192021 were as follows (in thousands):
Operating LeasesFinance Leases
2022$36,552 $5,018 
202333,368 6,222 
202420,367 6,222 
202514,588 6,222 
20269,689 5,544 
Thereafter122,717 97,682 
Total lease payments237,281 126,910 
Less imputed interest78,681 49,131 
Total$158,600 $77,779 
 Operating Leases Finance Leases
2020$28,333
 $2,229
202115,306
 2,140
202213,153
 4,431
202312,433
 4,431
202411,850
 4,431
Thereafter94,002
 94,788
Total lease payments175,077
 112,450
Less imputed interest37,254
 52,926
Total$137,823
 $59,524


NOTE 19—Stock-based Compensation Expense:
Incentive Plans
We have various share-based compensation plans that authorize the granting of (i) qualified and non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of our common stock, (ii) restricted stock and restricted stock units, (iii) performance unit awards and (iv) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) to employees and non-employee directors, at our option. Stock options granted to employees generally vest over three years and have a term of ten years.years. Restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards vest in periods ranging from one to five years from the date of grant. Performance unit awards are earned at a level ranging from 0% to 200% contingent upon the achievement of specific performance criteria over periods ranging from one to three years.years. Distribution of earned units occurs generally 50% upon completion of the applicable measurement period with the remaining 50% distributed one year thereafter.
111

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




In May 2017, the Company adopted the Albemarle Corporation 2017 Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which replaced the Albemarle Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan. The maximum number of shares available for issuance to participants under the Incentive Plan is 4,500,000 shares. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not affect awards already granted under the Albemarle Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan. Under the Albemarle Corporation 2013 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Non-Employee Directors Plan”), a maximum aggregate number of 500,000 shares of our common stock is authorized for issuance to the Company’s non-employee directors; any shares remaining available for issuance under the prior plans were canceled. The aggregate fair market value of shares that may be issued to a director during any compensation year (as defined in the agreement, generally July 1 to June 30) shall not exceed $150,000. At December 31, 2019,2021, there were 4,005,6573,554,425 shares available for grant under the Incentive Plan and 360,575335,427 shares available for grant under the Non-Employee Directors Plan.
Total stock-based compensation expense associated with our incentive plans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 amounted to $18.8 million, $19.3 million and $21.3 million,$15.2 million and $19.4 million, respectively, and is included in Cost of goods sold and Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. Total related recognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 amounted to $2.3 million, $2.4 million and $3.2 million, $2.6 million and $7.0 million, respectively. As a result of the sale of the Chemetall Surface Treatment business in 2016, we converted previously granted incentive awards owed to Chemetall employees to a cash liability to be paid on the original vesting dates of the awards. At December 31, 2019, $0.7 million of this cash liability was included in Accrued liabilities.
The following table summarizes information about the Company’s fixed-price stock options as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019:
 Shares Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 20181,316,733
 $59.55
 4.3 $26,438
Granted95,639
 91.00
    
Exercised(161,909) 29.73
    
Forfeited(5,932) 95.47
    
Outstanding at December 31, 20191,244,531
 $65.67
 4.2 $14,593
Exercisable at December 31, 2019980,865
 $59.47
 3.3 $13,583

2021:
SharesWeighted-Average Exercise PriceWeighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2020599,841 $73.24 5.6$44,554 
Granted62,479 157.21 
Exercised(302,151)60.87 
Outstanding at December 31, 2021360,169 $98.19 6.6$48,833 
Exercisable at December 31, 2021157,724 $85.29 4.6$23,419 
We granted 95,639, 63,25962,479, 76,221 and 82,20495,639 stock options during 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively. There were no significant modifications made to any share-based grants during these periods.
The fair value of each option granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Dividend yield1.58% 1.44% 1.56%
Volatility32.50% 32.48% 32.70%
Average expected life (years)6
 6
 6
Risk-free interest rate2.81% 3.06% 2.51%
Fair value of options granted$27.71
 $37.35
 $27.99

Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Dividend yield1.43 %1.69 %1.58 %
Volatility36.19 %32.65 %32.50 %
Average expected life (years)666
Risk-free interest rate1.44 %1.13 %2.81 %
Fair value of options granted$49.42 $22.14 $27.71 
Dividend yield is the average of historical yields and those estimated over the average expected life. The stock volatility is based on historical volatilities of our common stock. The average expected life represents the weighted average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding giving consideration to vesting schedules and our historical exercise patterns. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rate with stripped coupon interest for the period equal to the contractual term of the share option grant in effect at the time of grant.
The intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018was $37.2 million, $31.3 million and 2017 was $8.1 million,$6.2 million and $15.6 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
Total compensation cost not yet recognized for nonvested stock options outstanding as of December 31, 20192021 is approximately $2.8$2.9 million and is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 1.81.9 years. Cash proceeds from stock options exercised and tax benefits related to stock options exercised were $4.8$18.4 million and $1.9$8.4 million for
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, respectively. The Company issues new shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted common stock awards.
112

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




The following table summarizes activity in performance unit awards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019:
 Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested, beginning of period317,437
 $97.39
Granted100,288
 107.68
Vested(139,034) 66.93
Forfeited(18,958) 124.45
Nonvested, end of period259,733
 115.69

2021:
SharesWeighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested, beginning of period226,808 $116.54 
Granted63,648 157.21 
Vested(37,783)155.65 
Forfeited(27,770)117.27 
Nonvested, end of period224,903 121.39 
The weighted average grant date fair value of performance unit awards granted in 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018was $10.0 million, $8.7 million and 2017 was $10.8 million, $10.9 million and $9.6 million, respectively. During 2019,For all periods presented, half of the performance unit awards granted were based on the targeted return on invested capital (“ROIC Award”), while the other half were granted based on targeted market conditions (“TSR Award”). During 2018 and 2017, all performance unit awards were TSR awards. The fair value of each TSR Award was estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo simulation model as these equity awards are tied to a service and market condition. The calculation used the following weighted-average assumptions:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Volatility30.11% 29.92% 30.34%
Risk-free interest rate2.43% 2.36% 1.34%

Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Volatility47.13 %33.66 %30.11 %
Risk-free interest rate0.27 %0.85 %2.43 %
The weighted average fair value of performance unit awards that vested during 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017 was $11.7$5.8 million, $20.0$3.0 million and $11.9$11.7 million, respectively, based on the closing prices of our common stock on the dates of vesting. Total compensation cost not yet recognized for nonvested performance unit awards outstanding as of December 31, 20192021 is approximately $11.7$10.8 million, calculated based on current expectation of specific performance criteria, and is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of approximately 1.41.9 years. Each performance unit represents 1 share of common stock.
The following table summarizes activity in non-performance based restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019:2021:
SharesWeighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested, beginning of period326,744 $79.48 
Granted66,432 159.89 
Vested(69,937)93.61 
Forfeited(13,985)101.98 
Nonvested, end of period309,254 92.52 
 Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested, beginning of period257,518
 $85.44
Granted131,365
 79.27
Vested(89,548) 73.61
Forfeited(26,775) 89.23
Nonvested, end of period272,560
 85.98


The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted in 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017 was $10.4$10.6 million, $10.9$13.3 million and $8.2$10.4 million, respectively. The weighted average fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards that vested in 2021, 2020 and 2019 2018 and 2017 was $7.5$11.0 million, $4.9$9.0 million and $3.1$7.5 million, respectively, based on the closing prices of our common stock on the dates of vesting. Total compensation cost not yet recognized for nonvested, non-performance based restricted stock and restricted stock units as of December 31, 20192021 is approximately $12.7$12.8 million and is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.12.2 years. The fair value of the non-performance based restricted stock and restricted stock units was estimated on the date of grant adjusted for a dividend factor, if necessary.

113

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






NOTE 20—Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:
The components and activity in Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (net of deferred income taxes) consisted of the following during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 (in thousands):
Foreign
Currency Translation and Other
Net Investment Hedge
Cash Flow Hedge(a)
Interest Rate Swap(b)
Total
Balance at December 31, 2018$(407,805)$72,337 $— $(15,214)$(350,682)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(61,455)8,441 4,847 — (48,167)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss56 — — 2,591 2,647 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(61,399)8,441 4,847 2,591 (45,520)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests467 — — — 467 
Balance at December 31, 2019$(468,737)$80,778 $4,847 $(12,623)$(395,735)
Other comprehensive income (loss) income before reclassifications99,809 (34,185)1,602 — 67,226 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss23 — — 2,601 2,624 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax99,832 (34,185)1,602 2,601 69,850 
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(247)— — — (247)
Balance at December 31, 2020$(369,152)$46,593 $6,449 $(10,022)$(326,132)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(74,478)5,110 174 — (69,194)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss93 — — 2,623 2,716 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(74,385)5,110 174 2,623 (66,478)
Amounts reclassified within accumulated other comprehensive income51,703 (51,703)— — — 
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests160 — — — 160 
Balance at December 31, 2021$(391,674)$— $6,623 $(7,399)$(392,450)
(a)We entered into a foreign currency forward contract in the fourth quarter of 2019, which was designated and accounted for as a cash flow hedge under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. See Note 22, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” for additional information.
(b)The pre-tax portion of amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss is included in interest expense.
 
Foreign
Currency Translation
 
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefits(a)
 Net Investment Hedge 
Cash Flow Hedge(b)
 
Interest Rate Swap(c)
 Total
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income - balance at December 31, 2016$(484,121) $76
 $88,378
 $
 $(16,745) $(412,412)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications227,439
 
 (41,827) 
 
 185,612
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
 (97) 
 
 2,116
 2,019
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax227,439
 (97) (41,827) 
 2,116
 187,631
Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(887) 
 
 
 
 (887)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income - balance at December 31, 2017$(257,569) $(21) $46,551
 $
 $(14,629) $(225,668)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(150,258) 
 15,695
 
 
 (134,563)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss(d)

 (138) 10,091
 
 (585) 9,368
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(150,258) (138) 25,786
 
 (585) (125,195)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests181
 
 
 
 
 181
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income - balance at December 31, 2018$(407,646) $(159) $72,337
 $
 $(15,214) $(350,682)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(62,031) 576
 8,441
 4,847
 
 (48,167)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
 56
 
 
 2,591
 2,647
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(62,031) 632
 8,441
 4,847
 2,591
 (45,520)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests467
 
 
 
 
 467
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income - balance at December 31, 2019$(469,210) $473
 $80,778
 $4,847
 $(12,623) $(395,735)
114


(a)The pre-tax portion of amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of amortization of prior service benefit, which is a component of pension and postretirement benefits cost (credit). See Note 15, “Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits,” for additional information.
(b)
We entered into a foreign currency forward contract in the fourth quarter of 2019, which was designated and accounted for as a cash flow hedge under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. See Note 22, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” for additional information.
(c)The pre-tax portion of amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss is included in interest expense.
(d)Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss include a net benefit of $6.9 million, which was reclassified to Retained earnings for stranded tax effects caused by the TCJA.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






The amount of income tax benefit (expense) benefit allocated to each component of Other comprehensive income (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 is provided in the following tables (in thousands):
Foreign Currency Translation and OtherNet Investment HedgeCash Flow HedgeInterest Rate Swap
2021
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax$(76,544)$6,552 $174 $3,336 
Income tax benefit (expense)2,159 (1,442)— (713)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(74,385)$5,110 $174 $2,623 
2020
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax$99,710 $(43,826)$1,602 $3,336 
Income tax benefit (expense)122 9,641 — (735)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$99,832 $(34,185)$1,602 $2,601 
2019
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax$(61,397)$10,867 $4,847 $3,336 
Income tax expense(2)(2,426)— (745)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(61,399)$8,441 $4,847 $2,591 
 Foreign Currency Translation Pension and Postretirement Benefits Net Investment Hedge Cash Flow Hedge Interest Rate Swap
2019         
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax$(62,030) $633
 $10,867
 $4,847
 $3,336
Income tax expense(1) (1) (2,426) 
 (745)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(62,031) $632
 $8,441
 $4,847
 $2,591
          
2018         
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax$(150,262) $(128) $20,424
 $
 $3,336
Income tax benefit (expense)4
 (10) 5,362
 
 (3,921)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(150,258) $(138) $25,786
 $
 $(585)
          
2017         
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax$228,508
 $(96) $(65,958) $
 $3,336
Income tax (expense) benefit(1,069) (1) 24,131
 
 (1,220)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$227,439
 $(97) $(41,827) $
 $2,116


NOTE 21—Income Taxes:
Income before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments, and current and deferred income tax expense (benefit) are composed of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Income before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments:
Domestic$(186,077)$41,346 $190,195 
Foreign319,695 332,173 372,755 
Total$133,618 $373,519 $562,950 
Current income tax expense (benefit):
Federal$11,722 $(140)$21,258 
State694 (193)5,453 
Foreign55,530 56,734 47,056 
Total$67,946 $56,401 $73,767 
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense:
Federal$(38,413)$4,564 $13,255 
State(5,544)(2,893)(7,369)
Foreign5,457 (3,647)8,508 
Total$(38,500)$(1,976)$14,394 
Total income tax expense$29,446 $54,425 $88,161 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Income before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments:     
Domestic$190,195
 $223,702
 $(8,293)
Foreign372,755
 570,999
 455,091
Total$562,950
 $794,701
 $446,798
Current income tax expense (benefit):     
Federal$21,258
 $(2,712) $394,747
State5,453
 6,793
 323
Foreign47,056
 91,581
 78,688
Total$73,767
 $95,662
 $473,758
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense:     
Federal$13,255
 $15,573
 $(58,640)
State(7,369) 1,614
 (2,288)
Foreign8,508
 31,977
 18,987
Total$14,394
 $49,164
 $(41,941)
      
Total income tax expense$88,161
 $144,826
 $431,817

The TCJA was signed into law in the U.S. in December 2017, after which the SEC staff issued SAB 118, which provided a measurement period of up to one year from the TCJA’s enactment date for companies to complete their accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes. In connection with the enactment of the TCJA, the Company recorded a net tax expense of $366.9 million during 2017 and additional net benefits of $29.3 million in 2018 including measurement period adjustments, primarily related to the one-time transition tax, the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities and other TCJA impacts.

115
The current and deferred income tax expense for 2019 decreased as a result of our geographic mix of earnings. The decrease in the current income tax expense from 2017 to 2018 is primarily related to the tax impact of the one-time transition

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






tax imposed by the TCJA recorded in 2017. The increase in the deferred tax expense from 2017 to 2018 is primarily related to the tax impact associated with the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities under the TCJA from a statutory rate of 35% to 21% recorded in 2017.
As of January 1, 2018, the Company recorded a cumulative adjustment to decrease Retained earnings by $18.1 million as a result of the adoption of income tax standard updates.
The reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
% of Income Before Income Taxes
202120202019
Federal statutory rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit(3.5)0.3 (0.5)
Change in valuation allowance (a)
33.7 1.9 1.9 
Impact of foreign earnings, net(b)(c)
(40.5)(8.4)(3.7)
Global intangible low tax inclusion12.3 1.9 1.8 
Section 162(m) limitation4.5 0.5 0.3 
Subpart F income4.8 1.3 0.6 
Stock-based compensation(7.2)(1.0)(0.6)
Depletion(2.9)(0.9)(0.7)
U.S. federal return to provision(1.7)(0.9)(0.4)
Revaluation of unrecognized tax benefits/reserve requirements3.0 (0.4)(2.7)
Other items, net(1.5)(0.7)(1.3)
Effective income tax rate22.0 %14.6 %15.7 %
(a)The years ended December 31, 2021 and 2019 includes benefits of $6.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively, due to the release of a foreign valuation allowance due to changes in expected profitability.
 % of Income Before Income Taxes
 2019 2018 2017
Federal statutory rate21.0 % 21.0 % 35.0 %
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit(0.5) 0.9
 (0.5)
Change in valuation allowance (a)
1.9
 0.7
 (1.4)
Impact of foreign earnings, net(b)
(3.7) (0.3) (13.5)
Global intangible low tax inclusion1.8
 0.8
 
Change in U.S. federal statutory rate(c)

 0.1
 (14.0)
Transition tax on deferred foreign earnings(d)

 (5.3) 96.1
Subpart F income0.6
 0.9
 2.0
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
 
 (2.2)
Stock-based compensation(0.6) (0.7) (1.9)
Depletion(0.7) (0.6) (1.4)
Revaluation of unrecognized tax benefits/reserve requirements(2.7) 
 (0.7)
Other items, net(1.4) 0.7
 (0.9)
Effective income tax rate15.7 % 18.2 % 96.6 %
(b)Includes a discrete tax benefit of $27.9 million related to the revision of an indemnification estimate for an ongoing tax-related matter in Germany.
(c)Our statutory rate is decreased by of our share of the income of JBC, a Free Zones company under the laws of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The applicable provisions of the Jordanian law, and applicable regulations thereunder, do not have a termination provision and the exemption is indefinite. As a Free Zones company, JBC is not subject to income taxes on the profits of products exported from Jordan, and currently, substantially all of the profits are from exports. This resulted in a rate benefit of 34.6%, 11.9%, and 8.0% for 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

(a)The year ended December 31, 2019 includes a $2.1 million benefit due to the release of a foreign valuation allowance due to changes in expected profitability. 2018 includes an $8.2 million expense due to the establishment of a valuation allowance due to a foreign restructuring plan and a $1.5 million benefit due to the release of a foreign valuation allowance due to changes in expected profitability. 2017 includes a $10.9 million benefit from the release of valuation allowances due to a foreign restructuring plan.
(b)Our statutory rate is decreased by of our share of the income of JBC, a Free Zones company under the laws of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The applicable provisions of the Jordanian law, and applicable regulations thereunder, do not have a termination provision and the exemption is indefinite. As a Free Zones company, JBC is not subject to income taxes on the profits of products exported from Jordan, and currently, substantially all of the profits are from exports. This resulted in a rate benefit of 8.0%, 3.3%, and 8.9% for 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
(c)At December 31, 2017 we made a reasonable estimate of the tax impact of the U.S. enacted tax law on our business and our consolidated financial statements and recorded a provisional tax benefit of $62.3 million related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities for the reduction in the Federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%. In 2018, the updates to our calculation of the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted in income tax expense of $0.4 million.
(d)At December 31, 2017 we made a reasonable estimate of the tax impact of the U.S. enacted tax law on our business and our consolidated financial statements and recognized a provisional tax expense of $429.2 million for the one-time transition tax. During 2018, the impact of the refined one-time transition tax calculation was an income tax benefit of $42.3 million.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Deferred income tax assets and liabilities recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued employee benefits$18,374 $21,878 
Operating loss carryovers1,295,925 1,321,942 
Pensions48,720 78,683 
Tax credit carryovers2,448 1,582 
Other(a)
212,882 57,370 
Gross deferred tax assets1,578,349 1,481,455 
Valuation allowance(1,276,305)(1,326,204)
Deferred tax assets302,044 155,251 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation(411,336)(348,700)
Intangibles(83,182)(91,645)
Hedge of net investment of foreign subsidiary— (13,514)
Other(b)
(142,008)(75,927)
Deferred tax liabilities(636,526)(529,786)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(334,482)$(374,535)
Classification in the consolidated balance sheets:
Noncurrent deferred tax assets$18,797 $20,317 
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities(353,279)(394,852)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(334,482)$(374,535)
116

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




 December 31,
 2019 2018
Deferred tax assets:   
Accrued employee benefits$17,462
 $18,462
Operating loss carryovers1,134,410
 1,210,377
Pensions64,230
 61,308
Tax credit carryovers1,497
 1,270
Other64,955
 35,895
Gross deferred tax assets1,282,554
 1,327,312
Valuation allowance(1,148,268) (1,213,750)
Deferred tax assets134,286
 113,562
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Depreciation(349,264) (337,503)
Intangibles(88,934) (88,871)
Hedge of net investment of foreign subsidiary(23,498) (21,854)
Other(55,173) (31,287)
Deferred tax liabilities(516,869) (479,515)
    
Net deferred tax liabilities$(382,583) $(365,953)
Classification in the consolidated balance sheets:   
Noncurrent deferred tax assets$15,275
 $17,029
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities(397,858) (382,982)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(382,583) $(365,953)
(a)    Increase in other primarily related to deferred tax assets for the settlement of an arbitration ruling for a legacy Rockwood legal matter and the expense related to anticipated cost overruns for MRL’s 40% interest in lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton.
(b)    Increase in other primarily related to deferred tax liabilities recorded for the gain on the sale of the FCS business.

Changes in the balance of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Balance at January 1$(1,326,204)$(1,148,268)$(1,213,750)
Additions(61,470)(182,325)(24,986)
Deductions111,369 4,389 90,468 
Balance at December 31$(1,276,305)$(1,326,204)$(1,148,268)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Balance at January 1$(1,213,750) $(458,288) $(69,900)
Additions(a)
(24,986) (766,012) (408,252)
Deductions90,468
 10,550
 19,864
Balance at December 31$(1,148,268) $(1,213,750) $(458,288)

(a)During 2018, the Company recognized intercompany losses at a foreign entity related to international restructuring resulting in an increase to the deferred tax asset for net operating losses and an associated and equal valuation allowance of $749.8 million.
At December 31, 2019,2021, we had approximately $1.5$2.4 million of domestic credits available to offset future payments of income taxes, expiring in varying amounts between 20202022 and 2038.2039. We have established valuation allowances for $0.2 million of those domestic credits since we believe that it is more likely than not that the related deferred tax assets will not be realized. We believe that sufficient taxable income will be generated during the carryover period in order to utilize the other remaining credit carryovers.
At December 31, 2019,2021, we have on a pre-tax basis, domestic state net operating losses of $200.3$242.9 million, expiring between 20202022 and 2039,2041, which have pre-tax valuation allowances of $63.6$30.5 million established. In addition, we have on a pre-tax basis $4.52$5.10 billion of foreign net operating losses, which have pre-tax valuation allowances for $4.49$4.85 billion established. $2.76$2.80 billion of these foreign net operating losses expire in 2035 and $1.75$2.06 billion have an indefinite life. We have established valuation allowances for these deferred tax assets since we believe that it is more likely than not that the related deferred tax assets will not be realized. For the same reason, we established pre-tax valuation allowances of $56.7$111.0 million and $77.7$173.7 million for other state and foreign deferred tax assets, respectively, unrelated to net operating losses. The realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent on the generation of sufficient taxable income in the appropriate tax jurisdictions. Although realization is not assured, we believe it is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax assets will be realized. However, the amount considered realizable could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income change.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





As of December 31, 2019,2021, we have not recorded taxes on approximately $4.2$5.6 billion of cumulative undistributed earnings of our non-U.S.subsidiariesnon-U.S. subsidiaries and joint ventures. The TCJA imposed a mandatory transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and generally eliminated U.S. taxes on foreign subsidiary distribution with the exception of foreign withholding taxes and other foreign local tax. We generally do not provide for taxes related to our undistributed earnings because such earnings either would not be taxable when remitted or they are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. If in the foreseeable future, we can no longer demonstrate that these earnings are indefinitely reinvested, a deferred tax liability will be recognized. A determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these undistributed earnings is not practicable due to the complexity and variety of assumptions necessary based on the manner in which the undistributed earnings would be repatriated.
Liabilities related to uncertain tax positions were $21.2$27.7 million and $22.9$14.7 million at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, inclusive of interest and penalties of $3.7$7.0 million and $3.2$3.1 million at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, and are reported in Other noncurrent liabilities as provided in Note 16, “Other Noncurrent Liabilities.” These liabilities at December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 were reduced by $26.1$32.9 million and $13.0$24.1 million, respectively, for offsetting benefits from the corresponding effects of potential transfer pricing adjustments, state income taxes and rate arbitrage related to foreign structure. These offsetting benefits are recorded in Other assets as provided in Note 11, “Other Assets.” The resulting net asset of $8.6$12.2 million as of December 31, 20192021 would unfavorably affect earnings if recognized and released, while the net liabilityasset of $6.7$12.5 million at December 31, 20182020 would favorablyunfavorably affect earnings if recognized and released.
The liabilities related to uncertain tax positions, exclusive of interest, were $17.5$20.7 million and $19.7$11.6 million at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. The following is a reconciliation of our total gross liability related to uncertain tax positions for 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 (in thousands):
117

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017202120202019
Balance at January 1$19,742
 $21,438
 $25,384
Balance at January 1$11,639 $17,548 $19,742 
Additions for tax positions related to prior years2,235
 874
 
Additions for tax positions related to prior years75 5,646 2,235 
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years
 
 (1,933)Reductions for tax positions related to prior years(6)(174)— 
Additions for tax positions related to current year
 1,091
 1,132
Additions for tax positions related to current year10,911 315 — 
Lapses in statutes of limitations/settlements(4,494) (3,578) (4,198)Lapses in statutes of limitations/settlements(1,931)(12,128)(4,494)
Foreign currency translation adjustment65
 (83) 1,053
Foreign currency translation adjustment29 432 65 
Balance at December 31$17,548
 $19,742
 $21,438
Balance at December 31$20,717 $11,639 $17,548 
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Due to the statute of limitations, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax audits by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for years prior to 2011.2017. Due to the statute of limitations, we also are no longer subject to U.S. state income tax audits prior to 2011.2017.
With respect to jurisdictions outside the U.S., several audits are in process. We have audits ongoing for the years 2011 through 20182020 related to Germany, Italy, India, Belgium, South Africa and Chile, some of which are for entities that have since been divested.
While we believe we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
Since the timing of resolutions and/or closure of tax audits is uncertain, it is difficult to predict with certainty the range of reasonably possible significant increases or decreases in the liability related to uncertain tax positions that may occur within the next twelve months. Our current view is that it is reasonably possible that we could record a decreaseincrease in the liability related to uncertain tax positions, relating to a number of issues, up to approximately $9.6$0.3 million as a result of closure of tax statutes.

NOTE 22—Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
In assessing the fair value of financial instruments, we use methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and other risk factors existing at the time of assessment. Fair value information for our financial instruments is as follows:
Long-Term Debt—the fair values of our notes are estimated using Level 1 inputs and account for the difference between the recorded amount and fair value of our long-term debt. The carrying value of our remaining long-term debt reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value as substantially all of such debt bears interest based on prevailing variable market rates currently available in the countries in which we have borrowings.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





 December 31,
 2019 2018
 Recorded Amount Fair Value Recorded Amount Fair Value
 (In thousands)
Long-term debt$3,069,417
 $3,173,341
 $1,712,003
 $1,731,271

December 31,
20212020
Recorded AmountFair ValueRecorded AmountFair Value
(In thousands)
Long-term debt$2,405,021 $2,593,590 $3,588,157 $3,783,225 
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts—In the fourth quarter of 2019, we entered into a foreign currency forward contract with a notional value of 727.9 million Australian Dollars, to hedge the cash flow exposure of non-functional currency purchases during the construction of the Kemerton plant in Australia. This derivative financial instrument is used to manage risk and is not used for trading or other speculative purposes. This foreign currency forward contract has been designated as a hedging instrument under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. At December 31, 2019,2021 and 2020, we had outstanding designated foreign currency forward contracts with notional values totaling the equivalent of $481.2 million.$36.5 million and $75.4 million, respectively.
We also enter into foreign currency forward contracts in connection with our risk management strategies that have not been designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, in an attempt to minimize the financial impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These derivative financial instruments are used to manage risk and are not used for trading or other speculative purposes. The fair values of our non-designated foreign currency forward contracts are estimated based on current settlement values. At December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, we had outstanding non-designated foreign currency forward contracts with notional values totaling $1.15 billion$618.1 million and $626.5$611.1 million,, respectively, hedging our exposure to various currencies including the Euro, Chinese Renminbi, Chilean Peso and Australian Dollar.
118

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




The following table summarizes the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts included in the consolidated balance sheets as ofat December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
AssetsLiabilities
December 31,December 31,
2021202020212020
Designated as hedging instruments(a)
$237 $7,043 $57 $— 
Not designated as hedging instruments(b)
2,901 6,563 248 4,803 
Total$3,138 $13,606 $305 $4,803 
(a)    Included $0.2 million in Other current assets and $0.1 million in Accrued expenses at December 31, 2021, and $6.2 million in Other current assets and $0.9 million in Other assets at December 31, 2020.
 Assets Liabilities
 December 31, December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Designated as hedging instruments(a)
$5,369
 $
 $
 $
Not designated as hedging instruments(b)
2,032
 431
 3,613
 
Total$7,401
 $431
 $3,613
 $
(b)    Included $2.9 million in Other current assets and $0.2 million in Accrued expenses at December 31, 2021 and $6.6 million in Other current assets and $4.8 million in Accrued expenses at December 31, 2020.

(a)Included $3.7 million in Other current assets and $1.7 million in Other assets at December 31, 2019.
(b)Included $2.0 million in Other current assets and $3.6 million in Accrued expenses at December 31, 2019 and $0.4 million in Other accounts receivable at December 31, 2018.
The following table summarizes the net gains (losses) recognized for our foreign currency forward contracts during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Designated as hedging instruments:
Gain recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss)$174 $1,602 $4,847 
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Losses recognized in Other expenses, net(a)
$1,068 $(7,665)$(25,765)
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Designated as hedging instruments:     
Gain recognized in Other comprehensive (loss) income$4,847
 $
 $
Not designated as hedging instruments:     
(Losses) gains recognized in Other expenses, net(a)
$(25,765) $(19,851) $4,588

(a)
Fluctuations in the value of our foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments are generally expected to be offset by changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged, which are also reported in Other expenses, net.
(a)Fluctuations in the value of our foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments are generally expected to be offset by changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged, which are also reported in Other expenses, net.
In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, we recorded net cash (settlements) receiptssettlements of ($23.6)$2.4 million, ($25.2)$19.4 million and $9.4$23.6 million, respectively, primarily within Changes in Other, net,current assets and liabilities, in our consolidated statements of cash flows.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, there are no unrealized gains or losses related to the cash flow hedge expected to be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





The counterparties to our foreign currency forward contracts are major financial institutions with which we generally have other financial relationships. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties.

NOTE 23—Fair Value Measurement:
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into the following hierarchy:
Level 1Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
Level 3Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability


119

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following tables set forth our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020 (in thousands):
December 31, 2021Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1)Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Similar Items (Level 2)Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Available for sale debt securities(a)
$246,517 $— $— $246,517 
Investments under executive deferred compensation plan(b)
$32,491 $32,491 $— $— 
Private equity securities measured at net asset value(c)(d)
$4,696 $— $— $— 
Foreign currency forward contracts(e)
$3,138 $— $3,138 $— 
Liabilities:
Obligations under executive deferred compensation plan (b)
$32,491 $32,491 $— $— 
Foreign currency forward contracts(e)
$305 $— $305 $— 
December 31, 2020Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1)Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Similar Items (Level 2)Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Investments under executive deferred compensation plan(a)
$32,447 $32,447 $— $— 
Private equity securities measured at net asset value(b)(c)
$4,661 $— $— $— 
Foreign currency forward contracts(d)
$13,606 $— $13,606 $— 
Liabilities:
Obligations under executive deferred compensation plan(a)
$32,447 $32,447 $— $— 
Foreign currency forward contracts(d)
$4,803 $— $4,803 $— 
 December 31, 2019 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Similar Items (Level 2) Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:       
Investments under executive deferred compensation plan(a)
$28,715
 $28,715
 $
 $
Private equity securities(b)
$32
 $32
 $
 $
Private equity securities measured at net asset value(b)(c)
$4,890
 $
 $
 $
Foreign currency forward contracts(d)
$7,401
 $
 $7,401
 $
        
Liabilities:       
Obligations under executive deferred compensation plan (a)
$28,715
 $28,715
 $
 $
Foreign currency forward contracts(d)
$3,613
 $
 $3,613
 $
(a)Preferred equity of a Grace subsidiary acquired as a portion of the proceeds of the FCS divestiture on June 1, 2021. See Note 2, “Divestitures,” for further details on the material terms and conditions. A third-party estimate of the fair value was prepared using expected future cash flows over the period up to when the asset is likely to be redeemed, applying a discount rate that appropriately captures a market participant's view of the risk associated with the investment. These are considered to be Level 3 inputs.

 December 31, 2018 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Similar Items (Level 2) Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:       
Investments under executive deferred compensation plan(a)
$26,292
 $26,292
 $
 $
Private equity securities(b)
$26
 $26
 $
 $
Private equity securities measured at net asset value(b)(c)
$7,195
 $
 $
 $
Foreign currency forward contracts (d)
$431
 $
 $431
 $
        
Liabilities:       
Obligations under executive deferred compensation plan (a)
$26,292
 $26,292
 $
 $

(a)(b)We maintain an EDCP that was adopted in 2001 and subsequently amended. The purpose of the EDCP is to provide current tax planning opportunities as well as supplemental funds upon the retirement or death of certain of our employees. The EDCP is intended to aid in attracting and retaining employees of exceptional ability by providing them with these benefits. We also maintain a Benefit Protection Trust (the “Trust”) that was created to provide a source of funds to assist in meeting the obligations of the EDCP, subject to the claims of our creditors in the event of our insolvency. Assets of the Trust are consolidated in accordance with authoritative guidance. The assets of the Trust consist primarily of mutual fund investments (which are accounted for as trading securities and are marked-to-market on a Benefit Protection Trust (the “Trust”) that was created to provide a source of funds to assist in meeting the obligations of the EDCP, subject to the claims of our creditors in the event of our insolvency. Assets of the Trust are consolidated in accordance with authoritative guidance. The assets of the Trust consist primarily of mutual fund investments (which are accounted for as trading securities and are marked-to-market on a
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





monthly basis through the consolidated statements of income) and cash and cash equivalents. As such, these assets and obligations are classified within Level 1.
(c)Primarily consists of private equity securities classified as available-for-sale and are reported in Investments in the consolidated balance sheets. The changes in fair value are reported in Other expenses, net, in our consolidated statements of income.
(d)Holdings in private equity securities are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient and have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts of $4.7 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are included in this table to permit reconciliation to the marketable equity securities presented in Note 10, “Investments.”
(e)As a result of our global operating and financing activities, we are exposed to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial position. When deemed appropriate, we minimize our risks from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations through the use of foreign currency forward contracts. The foreign currency forward contracts are valued using broker quotations or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within Level 2. See Note 22, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” for further details about our foreign currency forward contracts.
120

(b)Primarily consists of private equity securities classified as available-for-saleAlbemarle Corporation and are reported in Investments in the consolidated balance sheets. The changes in fair value are reported in Other expenses, net, in our consolidated statements of income.Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




The following tables set forth the reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance for the Level 3 recurring fair value measurements (in thousands):
(c)Holdings in private equity securities are measuredAvailable for Sale Debt Securities
Beginning balance at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient and have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts of $4.9 million and $7.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, are included in this table to permit reconciliation to the marketable equity securities presented in Note 10, “Investments.”2020
$— 
(d)AdditionsAs a result244,530 
Accretion of our global operating and financing activities, we are exposed to market risks from changesdiscount7,429 
Change in foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial position. When deemed appropriate, we minimize our risks from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations through the use of foreign currency forward contracts. The foreign currency forward contracts are valued using broker quotations or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within Level 2. See Note 22, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” for further details about our foreign currency forward contracts.fair value(5,441)
Ending balance at December 31, 2021$246,518 

NOTE 24—Related Party Transactions:
Our consolidated statements of income include sales to and purchases from unconsolidated affiliates in the ordinary course of business as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Sales to unconsolidated affiliates$19,441 $22,589 $20,068 
Purchases from unconsolidated affiliates(a)
$213,077 $168,072 $210,351 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Sales to unconsolidated affiliates$20,068
 $35,094
 $29,514
Purchases from unconsolidated affiliates(a)
$210,351
 $256,701
 $209,266

(a)
Purchases from unconsolidated affiliates primarily relate to purchases from our Windfield joint venture.
(a)Purchases from unconsolidated affiliates primarily relate to purchases from our Windfield joint venture.
Our consolidated balance sheets include accounts receivable due from and payable to unconsolidated affiliates in the ordinary course of business as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
20212020
Receivables from related parties$2,139 $4,098 
Payables to related parties$47,499 $30,123 
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Receivables from related parties$7,163
 $14,348
Payables to related parties$35,502
 $68,357


NOTE 25—Segment and Geographic Area Information:
Our 3 reportable segments include: (1) Lithium; (2) Bromine Specialties;Bromine; and (3) Catalysts. During 2021, we changed the name of the Bromine Specialties segment to Bromine. This change simplifies the name of the reportable segment, and does not impact the operations of the business or disclosure of the related assets. Each segment has a dedicated team of sales, research and development, process engineering, manufacturing and sourcing, and business strategy personnel and has full accountability for improving execution through greater asset and market focus, agility and responsiveness. This business structure aligns with the markets and customers we serve through each of the segments. This structure also facilitates the continued standardization of business processes across the organization, and is consistent with the manner in which information is presently used internally by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to evaluate performance and make resource allocation decisions.
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following tables. The “All Other” category includes only the fine chemistry services business that doesdid not fit into any of our core businesses. On June 1, 2021, the Company completed the sale of the FCS business to Grace. See Note 3, “Divestitures,” for further details.
The Corporate category is not considered to be a segment and includes corporate-related items not allocated to the operating segments. Pension and OPEB service cost (which represents the benefits earned by active employees during the period) and amortization of prior service cost or benefit are allocated to the reportable segments, All Other, and Corporate, whereas the remaining components of pension and OPEB benefits cost or credit (“Non-operating pension and OPEB items”) are included in Corporate. Segment data includes intersegment transfers of raw materials at cost and allocations for certain corporate costs.
The Company’s chief operating decision maker uses adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) to assess the ongoing performance of the Company’s business segments and to allocate resources. The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted on a consistent basis for certain non-recurring or unusual items in a balanced manner and on a segment basis. These non-recurring or unusual items may include acquisition and
121

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






integration related costs, gains or losses on sales of businesses, restructuring charges, facility divestiture charges, non-operating pension and OPEB items and other significant non-recurring items. In addition, management uses adjusted EBITDA for business planning purposes and as a significant component in the calculation of performance-based compensation for management and other employees. The Company has reported adjusted EBITDA because management believes it provides transparency to investors and enables period-to-period comparability of financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure that is not required by, or presented in accordance with, U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP, or any other financial measure reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
(In thousands)
Net sales:
Lithium$1,363,284 $1,144,778 $1,358,170 
Bromine1,128,343 964,962 1,004,216 
Catalysts761,235 797,914 1,061,817 
All Other75,095 221,255 165,224 
Total net sales$3,327,957 $3,128,909 $3,589,427 
Adjusted EBITDA:
Lithium$479,538 $393,093 $524,934 
Bromine360,682 323,605 328,457 
Catalysts106,941 130,134 270,624 
All Other29,858 84,821 49,628 
Corporate(106,045)(112,915)(136,862)
Total adjusted EBITDA$870,974 $818,738 $1,036,781 

122
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Net sales:     
Lithium$1,358,170
 $1,228,171
 $1,018,885
Bromine Specialties1,004,216
 917,880
 855,143
Catalysts1,061,817
 1,101,554
 1,067,572
All Other165,224
 127,186
 128,914
Corporate
 159
 1,462
Total net sales$3,589,427
 $3,374,950
 $3,071,976
      
Adjusted EBITDA:     
Lithium$524,934
 $530,773
 $446,652
Bromine Specialties328,457
 288,116
 258,901
Catalysts270,624
 284,307
 283,883
All Other49,628
 14,091
 13,878
Corporate(136,862) (110,623) (117,834)
Total adjusted EBITDA$1,036,781
 $1,006,664
 $885,480

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






See below for a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA, the non-GAAP financial measure, from Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP (in thousands):
LithiumBromineCatalystsReportable Segments TotalAll OtherCorporateConsolidated Total
2021
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$192,244 $309,501 $55,353 $557,098 $27,988 $(461,414)$123,672 
Depreciation and amortization138,772 51,181 51,588 241,541 1,870 10,589 254,000 
Restructuring and other(a)
— — — — — 3,027 3,027 
Gain on sale of business/interest in properties, net(b)
132,400 — — 132,400 — (428,371)(295,971)
Acquisition and integration related costs(c)
— — — — — 12,670 12,670 
Interest and financing expenses(d)
— — — — — 61,476 61,476 
Income tax expense— — — — — 29,446 29,446 
Non-operating pension and OPEB items— — — — — (78,814)(78,814)
Legacy Rockwood legal matter(d)
— — — — — 657,412 657,412 
Albemarle Foundation contribution(e)
— — — — — 20,000 20,000 
Indemnification adjustments(f)
— — — — — 39,381 39,381 
Other(g)
16,122 — — 16,122 — 28,553 44,675 
Adjusted EBITDA$479,538 $360,682 $106,941 $947,161 $29,858 $(106,045)$870,974 
2020
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$277,711 $274,495 $80,149 $632,355 $76,323 $(332,914)$375,764 
Depreciation and amortization112,854 50,310 49,985 213,149 8,498 10,337 231,984 
Restructuring and other(a)
— — — — — 19,597 19,597 
Acquisition and integration related costs(c)
— — — — — 17,263 17,263 
Interest and financing expenses— — — — — 73,116 73,116 
Income tax expense— — — — — 54,425 54,425 
Non-operating pension and OPEB items— — — — — 40,668 40,668 
Other(h)
2,528 (1,200)— 1,328 — 4,593 5,921 
Adjusted EBITDA$393,093 $323,605 $130,134 $846,832 $84,821 $(112,915)$818,738 
2019
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$341,767 $279,945 $219,686 $841,398 $41,188 $(349,358)$533,228 
Depreciation and amortization99,424 47,611 50,144 197,179 8,440 7,865 213,484 
Restructuring and other(a)
— — — — — 5,877 5,877 
Gain on sale of property(i)
— — — — — (14,411)(14,411)
Acquisition and integration related costs(c)
— — — — — 20,684 20,684 
Interest and financing expenses(j)
— — — — — 57,695 57,695 
Income tax expense— — — — — 88,161 88,161 
Non-operating pension and OPEB items— — — — — 26,970 26,970 
Stamp duty(c)
64,766 — — 64,766 — — 64,766 
Windfield tax settlement(k)
17,292 — — 17,292 — — 17,292 
Other(l)
1,685 901 794 3,380 — 19,655 23,035 
Adjusted EBITDA$524,934 $328,457 $270,624 $1,124,015 $49,628 $(136,862)$1,036,781 
(a)In 2021, we recorded facility closure related to offices in Germany, and severance expenses in Germany and Belgium, in SG&A. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded severance expenses as part of business reorganization plans, impacting each of our businesses and Corporate, primarily in the U.S., Belgium, Germany and with our Jordanian joint venture partner. We recorded expenses of $0.7 million in Cost of goods sold, $19.2 million in SG&A and a $0.3 million gain in Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the portion of severance expense allocated to our Jordanian joint venture partner. In addition, we recorded severance payments as part of a business reorganization plans in Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31,
123

 Lithium Bromine Specialties Catalysts Reportable Segments Total All Other Corporate Consolidated Total
2019             
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$341,767
 $279,945
 $219,686
 $841,398
 $41,188
 $(349,358) $533,228
Depreciation and amortization99,424
 47,611
 50,144
 197,179
 8,440
 7,865
 213,484
Restructuring and other(a)

 
 
 
 
 5,877
 5,877
Acquisition and integration related costs(b)

 
 
 
 
 20,684
 20,684
Gain on sale of property(c)

 
 
 
 
 (14,411) (14,411)
Interest and financing expenses(d)

 
 
 
 
 57,695
 57,695
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 88,161
 88,161
Non-operating pension and OPEB items
 
 
 
 
 26,970
 26,970
Stamp duty(b)
64,766
 
 
 64,766
 
 
 64,766
Windfield tax settlement(e)
17,292
 
 
 17,292
 
 
 17,292
Other(f)
1,685
 901
 794
 3,380
 
 19,655
 23,035
Adjusted EBITDA$524,934
 $328,457
 $270,624
 $1,124,015
 $49,628
 $(136,862) $1,036,781
2018             
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$428,212
 $246,509
 $445,604
 $1,120,325
 $6,018
 $(432,781) $693,562
Depreciation and amortization95,193
 41,607
 49,131
 185,931
 8,073
 6,694
 200,698
Restructuring and other(a)

 
 
 
 
 3,838
 3,838
Gain on sale of business(g)

 
 (210,428) (210,428) 
 
 (210,428)
Acquisition and integration related costs(b)

 
 
 
 
 19,377
 19,377
Interest and financing expenses
 
 
 
 
 52,405
 52,405
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 144,826
 144,826
Non-operating pension and OPEB items
 
 
 
 
 5,285
 5,285
Legal accrual(h)

 
 
 
 
 27,027
 27,027
Environmental accrual(i)

 
 
 
 
 15,597
 15,597
Albemarle Foundation contribution(j)

 
 
 
 
 15,000
 15,000
Indemnification adjustments(k)

 
 
 
 
 25,240
 25,240
Other(l)
7,368
 
 
 7,368
 
 6,869
 14,237
Adjusted EBITDA$530,773
 $288,116
 $284,307
 $1,103,196
 $14,091
 $(110,623) $1,006,664
2017             
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation$342,992
 $218,839
 $230,665
 $792,496
 $5,521
 $(743,167) $54,850
Depreciation and amortization87,879
 40,062
 54,468
 182,409
 8,357
 6,162
 196,928
Utilization of inventory markup(m)
23,095
 
 
 23,095
 
 
 23,095
Restructuring and other(n)

 
 
 
 
 17,056
 17,056
Gain on acquisition(o)
(6,221) 
 
 (6,221) 
 
 (6,221)
Acquisition and integration related costs(b)

 
 
 
 
 33,954
 33,954
Interest and financing expenses(p)

 
 
 
 
 115,350
 115,350
Income tax expense
 
 
 
 
 431,817
 431,817
Non-operating pension and OPEB items
 
 
 
 
 (16,125) (16,125)
Note receivable reserve(q)

 
 
 
 
 28,730
 28,730
Other(r)
(1,093) 
 (1,250) (2,343) 
 8,389
 6,046
Adjusted EBITDA$446,652
 $258,901
 $283,883
 $989,436
 $13,878
 $(117,834) $885,480

(a)Severance payments as part of a business reorganization plan, $5.9 million recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $0.1 million and $3.7 million recorded in Cost of goods sold and Selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018.
(b)See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






2019. The balance of unpaid restructuring costs and severance is recorded in Accrued expenses and is expected to primarily be paid through 2022.
(c)Gain of $3.3 million recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses related to the release of liabilities as part of the sale of a property and $11.1 million gain recorded in Other expenses, net related to the sale of land in Pasadena, Texas not used as part of our operations.
(d)Included in Interest and financing expenses is a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million. See Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” for additional information.
(e)Represents our 49% share of a tax settlement between our Windfield joint venture and an Australian taxing authority, recorded in Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax). This is offset in Income tax expense by a discrete tax benefit related to seeking treaty relief from the competent authority to prevent double taxation.
(f)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2019 recorded in:
(b)Includes a $428.4 million gain related to the FCS divestiture recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021. See Note 3, “Divestitures,” for additional information on this gain. In addition, includes a $132.4 million expense related to anticipated cost overruns for MRL’s 40% interest in lithium hydroxide conversion assets being built in Kemerton. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.
(c)See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.
(d)Loss recorded in Other expenses, net for the year ended December 31, 2021 related to the settlement of an arbitration ruling for a legacy Rockwood legal matter. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for further details.
(e)Included in SG&A is a charitable contribution, using a portion of the proceeds received from the FCS divestiture, to the Albemarle Foundation, a non-profit organization that sponsors grants, health and social projects, educational initiatives, disaster relief, matching gift programs, scholarships and other charitable initiatives in locations where our employees live and the Company operates. This contribution is in addition to the normal annual contribution made to the Albemarle Foundation by the Company, and is significant in size and nature in that it is intended to provide more long-term benefits in these communities.
(f)Included in Other expenses, net to revise an indemnification estimate for an ongoing tax-related matter of a previously disposed business in Germany. A corresponding discrete tax benefit of $27.9 million was recorded in Income tax expense during the same period, netting to an expected cash obligation of approximately $11.5 million.
(g)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2021 recorded in:
Cost of goods sold - $10.5 million of expense related to a legal matter as part of a prior acquisition in our Lithium business.
SG&A - $11.5 million of legal fees related to a legacy Rockwood legal matter noted above, $9.8 million of expenses primarily related to non-routine labor and compensation related costs that are outside normal compensation arrangements, a $4.0 million loss resulting from the sale of property, plant and equipment and $3.8 million of charges for environmental reserves at a sites not part of our operations.
Other expenses, net - $4.8 million of net expenses primarily related to asset retirement obligation charges to update of an estimate at a site formerly owned by Albemarle.
(h)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2020 recorded in:
Cost of goods sold - $1.3 million of expense related to a legal matter as part of a prior acquisition in our Lithium business.
SG&A - $3.1 million of shortfall contributions for our multiemployer plan financial improvement plan and $3.8 million of a net expense primarily relating to the increase of environmental reserves at non-operating businesses we have previously divested.
Other expenses, net - $7.2 million gain related to the sale of our ownership percentage in the SOCC joint venture, $3.6 million of a net gain primarily relating to the sale of intangible assets in our Bromine business and property in Germany not used as part of our operations and a $2.5 million net gain resulting from the settlement of legal matters related to a business sold or a site in the process of being sold, partially offset by $9.6 million of losses resulting from the adjustment of indemnifications related to previously disposed businesses and $1.2 million of expenses related to other costs outside of our regular operations.
(i)Gain of $3.3 million recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses related to the release of liabilities as part of the sale of a property and $11.1 million gain recorded in Other expenses, net related to the sale of land in Pasadena, Texas not used as part of our operations.
(j)Included in Interest and financing expenses is a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million. See Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” for additional information.
(k)Represents our 49% share of a tax settlement between our Windfield joint venture and an Australian taxing authority, recorded in Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax). This is offset in Income tax expense by a discrete tax benefit related to seeking treaty relief from the competent authority to prevent double taxation.
(l)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2019 recorded in:
Cost of goods sold - $0.7 million related to non-routine labor and compensation related costs in Chile that are outside normal compensation arrangements.
Selling, general and administrative expenses - $1.8 million of shortfall contributions for our multiemployer plan financial improvement plan, $0.9 million of a write-off of uncollectableuncollectible accounts receivable from a terminated distributor in the Bromine Specialties segment, $1.0 million related to the settlement of terminated agreements, primarily in the Catalysts segment, and $0.8 million related to the settlement of an ongoing audit in the Lithium segment.
Other expenses, net - $3.1 million of unrecoverable vendor costs outside the operations of the business related to the construction of the future Kemerton production facility, $9.8 million of a net loss primarily resulting from the adjustment of indemnifications and other liabilities related to previously disposed businesses or purchase accounting, $3.6 million of asset retirement obligation charges related to the update of an estimate at a site formerly owned by Albemarle, and $1.2 million of non-operating pension costs from our 50% interest in JBC.

124

(g)See Note 3, “Divestitures,” for additional information.
(h)Included in Other expenses, net. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for additional information.
(i)Increase in environmental reserve to indemnify the buyer of a formerly owned site recorded in Other expenses, net. As defined in the agreement of sale, this indemnification has a set cutoff date in 2024, at which point we will no longer be required to provide financial coverage.
(j)Included in Selling, general and administrative expenses is a charitable contribution, using a portion of the proceeds received from the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture, to the Albemarle Foundation, a non-profit organization that sponsors grants, health and social projects, educational initiatives, disaster relief, matching gift programs, scholarships and other charitable initiatives in locations where our employees live and operate. This contribution is in addition to the normal annual contribution made to the Albemarle Foundation by the Company, and is significant in size and nature in that it is intended to provide more long-term benefits in the communities where we live and operate.
(k)Included in Other expenses, net is $19.7 million related to the proposed settlement of an ongoing audit of a previously disposed business in Germany, and $5.5 million related to the adjustment of indemnifications previously recorded from disposed businesses.
(l)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2018 recorded in:
Cost of goods sold - $4.9 million for the write-off of fixed assets related to a major capacity expansion in our Jordanian joint venture and $8.8 million related to non-routine labor and compensation related costs in Chile that are outside normal compensation arrangements.
Selling, general and administrative expenses - $2.3 million of shortfall contributions for our multiemployer plan financial improvement plan and a $1.2 million contribution, using a portion of the proceeds received from the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture, to schools in the state of Louisiana for qualified tuition purposes. This contribution is significant in size and is intended to provide long-term benefits for families in the Louisiana community. This was partially offset by a $1.5 million gain related to a refund from Chilean authorities due to an overpayment made in a prior year.
Other expenses, net - $1.5 million gain related to the reversal of previously recorded liabilities of disposed businesses.
(m)In connection with the acquisition of Jiangli New Materials, completed on December 31, 2016, the Company valued inventory purchased from Jiangli New Materials at fair value, which resulted in a markup of the underlying net book value of the inventory totaling approximately $23.1 million. The utilization of this inventory markup was included in Costs of goods sold during the year ended December 31, 2017, the estimated remaining selling period.
(n)During 2017, we initiated action to reduce costs in each of our reportable segments at several locations, primarily at our Lithium sites in Germany. Based on the restructuring plans, we have recorded expenses of $2.9 million in Cost of goods sold, $8.4 million in Selling, general and administrative expenses, and $5.7 million in Research and development expenses, primarily related to expected severance payments.
(o)Gain recorded in Other expenses, net related to the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Salmag. See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” for additional information.
(p)During the first quarter of 2017, we repaid the 3.00% Senior notes in full, €307.0 million of the 1.875% Senior notes and $174.7 million of the 4.50% Senior notes, as well as related tender premiums of $45.2 million. As a result, included in Interest and financing expenses is a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $52.8 million, representing the tender premiums, fees, unamortized discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs from the redemption of these senior notes.
(q)Reserve recorded in Other expenses, net against a note receivable on one of our European entities no longer deemed probable of collection.
(r)Included amounts for the year ended December 31, 2017 recorded in:
Cost of goods sold - $1.3 million reversal of deferred income related to an abandoned project at an unconsolidated investment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses - $3.3 million of shortfall contributions for our multiemployer plan financial improvement plan, partially offset by $1.0 million related to a reversal of an accrual recorded as part of purchase accounting from a previous acquisition.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Other expenses, net - $3.2 million of asset retirement obligation charges related to the update of an estimate at a site formerly owned by Albemarle, losses of $8.7 million related to adjustments of settlements and indemnifications of previously disposed businesses, the adjustment of tax indemnification expenses of $3.7 million primarily related to the filing of tax returns and a competent authority agreement for a previously disposed business and $1.0 million related to the settlement of a legal claim. This is partially offset by gains of $10.6 million and $1.1 million related to the reversal of liabilities recorded as part of purchase accounting from a previous acquisition and the previous disposal of a property, respectively.

 December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
   (In thousands)  
Identifiable assets:     
Lithium(a)
$6,570,791
 $4,605,070
 $3,979,615
Bromine Specialties799,456
 753,157
 745,007
Catalysts1,163,590
 1,134,975
 1,332,599
All Other146,211
 128,185
 126,486
Corporate(b)
1,180,815
 960,287
 1,567,065
Total identifiable assets$9,860,863
 $7,581,674
 $7,750,772




December 31,
202120202019
(In thousands)
Identifiable assets:
Lithium(a)
$7,676,259 $7,134,229 $6,570,791 
Bromine939,808 867,648 799,456 
Catalysts1,149,592 1,066,089 1,163,590 
All Other— 136,659 146,211 
Corporate1,208,459 1,246,321 1,180,815 
Total identifiable assets$10,974,118 $10,450,946 $9,860,863 
(a)Increase in Lithium identifiable assets each year primarily due to capital expenditures for growth and capacity increases.
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
(In thousands)
Depreciation and amortization:
Lithium$138,772 $112,854 $99,424 
Bromine51,181 50,310 47,611 
Catalysts51,588 49,985 50,144 
All Other1,870 8,498 8,440 
Corporate10,589 10,337 7,865 
Total depreciation and amortization$254,000 $231,984 $213,484 
Capital expenditures:
Lithium$813,128 $720,563 $665,585 
Bromine70,711 57,486 82,208 
Catalysts49,312 44,448 57,939 
All Other2,339 6,792 7,309 
Corporate18,177 21,188 38,755 
Total capital expenditures$953,667 $850,477 $851,796 

Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
(In thousands)
Net Sales(a):
United States$730,738 $743,834 $858,084 
Foreign(b)
2,597,219 2,385,075 2,731,343 
Total$3,327,957 $3,128,909 $3,589,427 
(a)Net sales are attributed to countries based upon shipments to final destination.
(b)In 2021, net sales to China, Japan and Korea represented 18%, 14% and 11%, respectively, of total net sales. In 2020, net sales to Korea, China and Japan represented 14%, 14%, and 13%, respectively, of total net sales. In 2019, net sales to Korea, China and Japan represented 17%, 13%, and 12%, respectively, of total net sales.

125

(a)Increase in Lithium identifiable assets at December 31, 2019 primarily due to the acquisition of 60% interest in MRL’s Wodgina Project assets, as well as capital expenditures for growth and capacity increases.
(b)Decrease in Corporate identifiable assets at December 31, 2018 primarily due to the net use of cash and cash equivalents for items such as capital expenditures, share repurchases and commercial paper repayments.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
   (In thousands)  
Depreciation and amortization:     
Lithium$99,424
 $95,193
 $87,879
Bromine Specialties47,611
 41,607
 40,062
Catalysts50,144
 49,131
 54,468
All Other8,440
 8,073
 8,357
Corporate7,865
 6,694
 6,162
Total depreciation and amortization$213,484
 $200,698
 $196,928
Capital expenditures:     
Lithium$665,585
 $500,849
 $192,318
Bromine Specialties82,208
 79,357
 46,427
Catalysts57,939
 52,019
 46,808
All Other7,309
 5,232
 3,657
Corporate38,755
 62,534
 28,493
Total capital expenditures$851,796
 $699,991
 $317,703


 Year Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
   (In thousands)  
Net Sales(a):
     
United States$858,084
 $887,416
 $840,589
Foreign(b)
2,731,343
 2,487,534
 2,231,387
Total$3,589,427
 $3,374,950
 $3,071,976

(a)Net sales are attributed to countries based upon shipments to final destination.
(b)In 2019, net sales to Korea, China and Japan represented 17%, 13%, and 12%, respectively, of total net sales. In 2018, net sales to Korea, China and Japan represented 13%, 12%, and 10%, respectively, of total net sales. In 2017, net sales to China represented 15% of total net sales. No net sales in any other foreign country exceed 10% of total net sales.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
   (In thousands)  
Long-Lived Assets(a):
     
United States$1,003,496
 $929,291
 $833,002
Australia1,981,642
 407,141
 364,624
Chile1,687,090
 1,406,478
 1,069,859
Jordan256,363
 254,800
 242,626
Netherlands165,782
 166,853
 171,980
China109,235
 91,160
 50,532
Germany89,568
 101,168
 115,305
France44,936
 43,698
 40,852
Brazil37,165
 40,464
 47,255
Other foreign countries68,499
 65,937
 60,626
Total$5,443,776
 $3,506,990
 $2,996,661




As of December 31,
202120202019
(In thousands)
Long-Lived Assets(a):
United States$1,040,252 $1,007,793 $1,003,496 
Australia2,736,590 2,362,377 1,981,642 
Chile1,923,821 1,814,658 1,687,090 
Jordan262,392 256,640 256,363 
Netherlands177,405 181,206 165,782 
China139,537 122,749 109,235 
Germany80,956 90,174 89,568 
France49,740 45,505 44,936 
Brazil29,474 24,393 37,165 
Other foreign countries62,667 66,273 68,499 
Total$6,502,834 $5,971,768 $5,443,776 
(a)    Long-lived assets are comprised of the Company’s Property, plant and equipment and joint ventures included in Investments.

126

(a)Long-lived assets are comprised of the Company’s Property, plant and equipment and joint ventures included in Investments.

NOTE 26—Quarterly Financial Summary (Unaudited):
 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
2019       
Net sales$832,064
 $885,052
 $879,747
 $992,564
Gross profit(a)
$283,486
 $325,914
 $309,867
 $338,511
Net income$151,526
 $174,970
 $171,618
 $106,243
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(17,957) (20,772) (16,548) (15,852)
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$133,569
 $154,198
 $155,070
 $90,391
Basic earnings per share$1.26
 $1.46
 $1.46
 $0.85
Shares used to compute basic earnings per share105,799
 105,961
 105,999
 106,037
Diluted earnings per share$1.26
 $1.45
 $1.46
 $0.85
Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share106,356
 106,316
 106,299
 106,314
 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
2018       
Net sales$821,629
 $853,874
 $777,748
 $921,699
Gross profit$304,979
 $311,356
 $280,537
 $320,384
(Gain) loss on sale of business, net(b)
$
 $(218,705) $
 $8,277
Net income$138,925
 $310,686
 $143,479
 $146,049
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(7,165) (8,225) (13,734) (16,453)
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation$131,760
 $302,461
 $129,745
 $129,596
Basic earnings per share$1.19
 $2.76
 $1.21
 $1.22
Shares used to compute basic earnings per share110,681
 109,671
 107,315
 106,042
Diluted earnings per share$1.18
 $2.73
 $1.20
 $1.21
Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share111,867
 110,659
 108,302
 107,005
(a)Cost of goods sold for the third quarter of 2019 included expense of $7.0 million due to the correction of an out-of-period error regarding carbonate inventory values related to the second quarter of 2019.
(b)Represents the gain (loss) on the Polyolefin Catalysts Divestiture. See Note 3, “Divestitures,” for additional information.

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






As discussed in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” actuarial gains and losses related to our defined benefit pension and OPEB plan obligations are recognized annually in our consolidated statements of income in the fourth quarter and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for a remeasurement during a fiscal year. During the year ended December 31, 2019, actuarial losses were recognized as follows: fourth quarter—$29.3 million ($21.1 million after income taxes) as a result of the annual remeasurement process. During the year ended December 31, 2018, actuarial losses were recognized as follows: fourth quarter—$14.0 million ($10.6 million after income taxes) as a result of the annual remeasurement process.
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
NONE
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Design and Evaluation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequateManagement’s report on internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” (2013) set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2019, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein. Management’s report and the independent registered public accounting firm’s report are included in Item 8 under the captions entitled “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and are incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company has begun the implementation of a new enterprise resource platform system to increase the overall efficiency and productivity of our processes, which has resulted in changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) throughout the implementation process in 2019. No other changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20192021 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.Other Information.
NONE
Albemarle Corporation and SubsidiariesItem 9B.
Other Information.
NONE

Item 9C.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections.
NONE

PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this Item 10 will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the information in “Executive Officers of the Registrant” appearing after Item 4 in Part I of this Annual Report, is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Conduct
We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, known as the Albemarle Code of Conduct. The Albemarle Code of Conduct is available on our website, www.albemarle.com. Shareholders may also request a free copy of the Albemarle Code of Conduct from: Albemarle Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, 4250 Congress Street, Suite 900, Charlotte, North Carolina 28209. We will disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of our Code of Conduct that applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions that relates to any element of the Code of Conduct as defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K by posting such information on our website.

New York Stock Exchange Certifications
Because our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), our Chief Executive Officer is required to make, and he has made, an annual certification to the NYSE stating that he was not aware of any violation by us of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. Our Chief Executive Officer made his annual certification to that effect to
127

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
the NYSE as of June 3, 2019.May 11, 2021. In addition, we have filed, as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer required under Sections 906 and 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding the quality of our public disclosure.
Additional information will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item 11 will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item 12 will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item 13 will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item 14 will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)(1) The following consolidated financial and informational statements of the registrant are included in Part II Item 8 on pages 5174 to 106:126:
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 238)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and 20182020
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income, Comprehensive Income, Changes in Equity and Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(a)(2) No Financial Statement Schedules are provided in accordance with Item 15(a)(2) as the information is either not applicable, not required or has been furnished in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
128

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

129

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

130

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

131

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

132

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
133

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
134

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

*101Interactive Data Files (Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,2021, furnished in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language)).
135

Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020, and 2017,2019, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
#Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*Included with this filing.
(c) In accordance with Regulation S-X Rule 3-09, the audited financial statements of Windfield Holdings Pty. Ltd. (“Windfield”) for the year ended December 31, 2019, Windfield’s fiscal year end, will be filed by amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K on or before June 30, 2020.
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.
NONE
136

Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.
NONE
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
(Registrant)
By:
/S/    LJ. KUTHERENT C. KMISSAMASTERS   IV
(Luther C. Kissam IV)J. Kent Masters)
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: February 26, 202018, 2022
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated as of February 26, 2020.18, 2022.

SignatureTitle
/S/    LUTHER C. KISSAM IV        
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
(Luther C. Kissam IV)officer)
/S/    SCOTT A. TOZIER        
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
(Scott A. Tozier)officer)
/S/    JOHN BARICHIVICH
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)
(John Barichivich)
/S/    LAURIE BRLAS
Director
(Laurie Brlas)
/S/    WILLIAM H. HERNANDEZ        
Director
(William H. Hernandez)
/S/    DOUGLAS L. MAINE        
Director
(Douglas L. Maine)
/S/    J. KENT MASTERS   
DirectorChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
(J. Kent Masters)officer)
/S/    SCOTT A. TOZIER        
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
(Scott A. Tozier)officer)
/S/    JOHN C.BARICHIVICH III
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)
(John C. Barichivich III)
/S/    M. LAUREN BRLAS
Director
(M. Lauren Brlas)
/S/    GLENDA J. MINOR      
Director
(Glenda J. Minor)
/S/    JAMES J. O’BRIEN        
Director
(James J. O’Brien)
/S/    DIARMUID B. O’CONNELL        
Director
(Diarmuid B. O’Connell)
/S/    DEAN L. SEAVERS        
Director
(Dean L. Seavers)
/S/    GERALD A. STEINER        
Director
(Gerald A. Steiner)
/S/    HARRIETT TEE TAGGART        
Director
(Harriett Tee Taggart)
/S/    HOLLY A. VAN DEURSEN
Director
(Holly A. Van Deursen)
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries

/S/    ALEJANDRO D. WOLFF
Director
(Alejandro D. Wolff)

115
137