legislative changes impacting our relationship with our workforce include changes to an employer’s obligation to recognize collective bargaining units, the process by which collective bargaining units are negotiated or other significant events that would cause liquidityimposed, minimum wage requirements, and health care mandates.

Our policies, procedures and internal controls are designed to decrease orcomply with all applicable laws and regulations, including those imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, as well as applicable employment laws. Additional legal and regulatory requirements, such as those arising under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and various foreign laws, increase the complexity of the regulatory environment in a material way. However, there can be no assurance thatwhich we operate and the Company will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that the Company will be able to maintain its ability to borrow under its revolving credit facility. The Company does not expect any material changes in the mix (between equity and debt) or the relativerelated cost of capital resources.

Anti-takeover provisions – New York anti-takeover law provisionscompliance. Failure to comply with such laws and the classified Board Amendmentregulations may discourage unsolicited takeovers.result in damage to our reputation, financial condition and market price of our stock.

In August 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a Classified Board Amendment which together with anti-takeover provisions eschewed byof New York State Law may discourage open market purchases or a non-negotiated tender or exchange offer for the stock of the Company. This may be adverse to the interests of certain shareholders.

The nature of our business involves the receipt and storage of personal information about certain customers. If we experience a data security breach, we could be exposed to government enforcement actions and private litigation. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in our ability to protect their personal information, which could cause them to discontinue usage of our customer loyalty programs or participation in other programs. Such events could lead to lost future sales and adversely affect our results of operations.

We could be materially and adversely affected if either of our distribution centers is disrupted.

We operate two distribution centers, one in Albany, New York and the other in Carson, California. We ship 71% of our merchandise inventory through our distribution centers. If either of our distribution centers is destroyed, or disrupted for any reason, including because of weather or labor issues, we could incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with distributing our products to our stores during the time it takes to reopen or replace the centers.

In addition, our Carson, California distribution center is located in a state where earthquakes are prevalent. Such an event could result in significant physical damage to or closure of this center and delay distribution of merchandise from our suppliers to our center and stores, which could adversely affect our results of operation. We maintain business interruption insurance to protect us from the costs relating to matters such as a shutdown, but our insurance may not be sufficient, or the insurance proceeds may not be timely paid to us, in the event of a shutdown.

The Company’s stock price has experienced and could continue to experience volatility and could decline further, resulting in a substantial loss on your investment.

Our stock price has experienced, and could continue to experience in the future, substantial volatility as a result of many factors, including recent global economic conditions, broad market fluctuations and public perception of the prospects for music and the home video industry. Changes in our comparable store net sales results could also affect the price of our Common Stock. Failure to meet market expectations, particularly with respect to comparable store sales, net revenues, operating margins and earnings per share, would likely result in a continued decline in the market price of our stock.

In addition, an active trading market for our Common Stock may not be sustained, which could affect the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares and could depress the market price of their shares. The stock market in general and the market for music and home video related stocks in particular, has been highly volatile. For example, the closing price of our Common Stock has fluctuated between $4.69 and $0.60 from January 1, 2008 and March 31, 2009.

As a result, the market price of our Common Stock has been and is likely to remain volatile, and investors in our Common Stock may experience a decrease in the value of their stock, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects.

The failure to maintain a minimum closing share price of $1.00 per share of our Common Stock could result in the delisting of our shares on The NASDAQ Global Market, which would harm the market price of the Company’s Common Stock.

In order to retain our listing on The NASDAQ Global Market we are required by NASDAQ to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share. Our stock price is currently below $1.00 and has remained so since January 21, 2009. However, on October 16, 2008, NASDAQ suspended enforcement of the rules requiring a minimum $1.00 per share closing share price until January 19, 2009. On December 18, 2008 NASDAQ extended the suspension until April 19, 2009. On March 31, 2009, NASDAQ extended the suspension of continued listing requirements regarding minimum bid price and market value of publicly held share until July 19, 2009. A new compliance period will begin on July 20, 2009. In the event that our stock does close below the minimum bid price of $1.00 per share for any 30 consecutive business days following the reinstatement of the rules on July 20, 2009, we can regain compliance if our Common Stock closes at or above $1.00 per share for 10 consecutive days during the 180 days immediately following. If we are unable to do so, our stock could be delisted from The NASDAQ Global Market, transferred to a listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market, or delisted from the NASDAQ markets altogether. The failure to maintain our listing on The NASDAQ Global Market could harm the liquidity of the Company’s Common Stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of our Common Stock.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED SEC COMMENTS

The Company has not received within 180 days or more before February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, written comments from the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that remain unresolved.amended.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Retail Stores

At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the Company operated 812712 stores under operating leases, many of which have renewal options. The majority of the leases provide for the payment of fixed monthly rentals and expenses for maintenance, property taxes and insurance while a small numberthe others provide for the payment of monthly rentals based on a percentage of sales. ManyCertain leases provide for added rent based on store sales in excess of specified levels. The following table lists the leases due to expire as of the fiscal year-end in each of the years shown, assuming any renewal options are not exercised:

		No. of				No. of
Year		Leases		Year		Leases		No. of Leases			Year			No. of Leases
2008		342		2012		41
2009		178		2013		18		337				2013		25
2010		101		2014		25		149				2014		27
2011		49		2015 and beyond		58		81				2015		31
2012								37			2016 and beyond			25

As leases expire, the Company will evaluate the decision to exercise renewal rights or obtain new leases for the same or similar locations based on store profitability. The Company owns one of its stores.

Corporate Offices and Distribution Center Facilities

The Company leases its Albany, New York, distribution facility and corporate office space from its largest shareholder and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer under three capital lease arrangements that extend through 2015. These leases are at fixed rentals with provisions for biennial increases based on increases in the Consumer Price Index. The Company incurs all property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. The office portion of the facility is approximately 39,800 square feet and the distribution center portion is approximately 141,500 square feet. The Company also leases a 198,300 square foot distribution center in Carson, California; this lease includes twoa five-year renewal optionsoption and expires in December 2015. As of February 2, 2008, the Company owned a 236,600 square foot distribution center with 59,200 square feet of adjacent office space in North Canton, Ohio. The North Canton facility was closed subsequent to fiscal year end and was sold in March 2008.2010.

The Company believes that its existing distribution facilities are adequate to meet the Company’s planned business needs. Shipments from the distribution facilities to the Company’s stores provide approximately 70%71% of all merchandise shipment requirements to stores. Stores are serviced by common carriers chosen on the basis of geography and rate considerations. The balance of the stores’ merchandise requirements is satisfied through direct shipments from vendors.

The Company leases an additional 31,700 square feet of office space in Albany, New York. The operating lease expires in June 2014 and includes two, five-year options to renew.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of its business and have not been finally adjudicated. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters, it is management’s opinion, based upon the information available at this time, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market InformationInformation.. The Company’s Common Stock trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “TWMC.” As of March 19, 2008,31, 2009, there were 469473 shareholders of record. The following table sets forth high and low last reported sale prices for each fiscal quarter during the period from January 29, 2006February 2, 2007 through March 28, 2008.31, 2009.

		Closing Sales Prices
		High		Low
2006
1stQuarter		$6.17		$5.06
2ndQuarter		$7.35		$5.03
3rdQuarter		$6.50		$5.50
4thQuarter		$6.88		$5.45
2007
1stQuarter		$5.82		$5.20
2ndQuarter		$5.44		$4.30
3rdQuarter		$4.79		$4.01
4thQuarter		$5.76		$3.83
2008
1stQuarter (through		$4.45		$3.12
March 28, 2008)

		Closing Sales Prices
		High		Low
2007
1st Quarter		$5.82		$5.20
2nd Quarter		$5.44		$4.30
3rd Quarter		$4.79		$4.01
4th Quarter		$5.76		$3.83
2008
1st Quarter		$4.45		$3.12
2nd Quarter		$3.33		$2.34
3rd Quarter		$3.13		$1.99
4th Quarter		$2.35		$0.76
2009
1st Quarter (through		$0.89		$0.52
March 31, 2009)

On March 28, 2008,31, 2009, the last reported sale price on the Common Stock on the NASDAQ National Market was $3.68.$0.60.

Dividend Policy:The Company has never declared dividends on its Common Stock and does not plan to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future.Stock. The Company’s credit agreementfacility does not restrict the payment of cash dividends so long as payment conditions per the agreement are met. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends will depend upon capital requirements, limitations imposed by the Company’s credit agreementfacility and other factors the Company’s Board of Directors may consider.

Five-Year Performance Graph:

The following line graph reflects a comparison of the cumulative total return of the Company’s Common Stock from January 31, 200330, 2004 through January 31, 200830, 2009 with the Nasdaq Index (U.S. Stocks) and with the Nasdaq National Market Retail Trade Stocks index. Because none of the Company’s leading competitors has been an independent publicly traded company over the period, the Company has elected to compare shareholder returns with the published index of retail companies compiled by NASDAQ. All values assume a $100 investment on January 31, 2003,30, 2004, and that all dividends were reinvested.

														2004		2005		2006					2007					2008					2009
		2003		2004		2005		2006		2007		2008
Trans World Entertainment Corporation		100		235		393		164		176		135		100		167				70					75					57			10
NASDAQ (U.S. Stocks)		100		156		156		175		188		181		100		100				113					121					116			58
NASDAQ Retail Trade Stocks		100		147		177		190		207		184		100		121				129					141					125			81

Item 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected Statement of Operations and Balance Sheet data for the five fiscal years ended February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 and is derived from the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 consisted of 53 weeks while all the other fiscal years of the Company presented consisted of 52 weeks. This information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes and other financial information included herein, including Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

		Fiscal Year Ended
		February 2,		February 3,		January 28,		January 29,		January 31,
		2008		2007		2006		2005		2004
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:		($ in thousands, except per share and store data)
Net sales		$1,265,658		$1,471,157		$1,238,486		$1,365,133		$1,330,626
Cost of sales		819,911		951,935		806,873		869,999		842,726
Gross profit		445,747		519,222		431,613		495,134		487,900
Selling, general and administrative expenses		470,386		519,246		426,854		450,162		459,441
Impairment charge(1)		30,731		---		---		---		---
(Loss) income from operations		(55,370)		(24)		4,759		44,972		28,459
Interest expense		6,519		5,504		2,954		2,444		2,147
Other income		(429)		(4,435)		(2,171)		(1,039)		(718)
(Loss) income before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative
goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(61,460)		(1,093)		3,976		43,567		27,030
Income tax expense (benefit)(2)		37,975		(2,041)		1,090		4,892		8,302
(Loss) earnings before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(99,435)		948		2,886		38,675		18,728
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill , net of income taxes(3)		_		10,721		---		3,166		4,339
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle,
net of income taxes(4)		---		---		(2,277)		---		---
Net (loss) income		($99,435)		$11,669		$609		$41,841		$23,067
Basic(loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		($3.20)		$0.03		$0.09		$1.12		$0.50
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill		__		0.35		---		0.09		0.12
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		__		---		(0.07)		---		---
Basic (loss) earnings per share		($3.20)		$ 0.38		$ 0.02		$1.21		$0.62
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic		31,046		30,797		31,962		34,531		37,422
Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative
goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		($3.20)		$0.03		$0.09		$1.06		$0.49
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill		__		0.33		---		0.09		0.11
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		__		---		(0.07)		---		---
Diluted (loss) earnings per share		($3.20)		$ 0.36		$ 0.02		$1.15		$0.60
Weighted average number of shares – diluted		31,046		31,986		32,132		36,297		38,209
Proforma amounts assuming new accounting principles were applied retroactively:
(Loss) earnings before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported		($ 99,435)		$ 948		$ 2,886		$38,675		$18,728
Proforma (loss) earnings before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill
and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(99,435)		948		2,922		38,946		18,533
Pro forma net (loss) income		(99,435)		11,669		2,922		42,122		22,872
Per share amounts:
Basic (loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative
goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported		($3.20)		$0.03		$0.09		$1.12		$0.50
Proforma basic (loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated
negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		($3.20)		$0.03		$0.09		$1.13		$0.50
Pro forma basic (loss) earnings per share		($3.20)		$0.38		$0.09		$1.22		$0.61
Diluted (loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative
goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported		($3.20)		$0.03		$0.09		$1.06		$0.49
Proforma diluted (loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated
negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		($3.20)		$0.03		$0.09		$1.07		$0.49
Pro forma diluted (loss) earnings per share		($3.20)		$0.36		$0.09		$1.16		$0.60

		Fiscal Year Ended
		January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008			February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006			January 29, 2005
		($ in thousands, except per share and store data)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net sales			$987,625			$1,265,658			$1,471,157			$1,238,486			$1,365,133
Cost of sales			656,730			819,911			951,935			806,873			869,999
Gross profit			330,895			445,747			519,222			431,613			495,134
Selling, general and administrative expenses			380,801			470,386			519,246			426,854			450,162
Impairment charge(1)			15,159			30,731			—			—			—
(Loss) income from operations			(65,065	)		(55,370	)		(24	)		4,759			44,972
Interest expense			4,098			6,519			5,504			2,954			2,444
Other income			(180	)		(429	)		(4,435	)		(2,171	)		(1,039	)
(Loss) income before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			(68,983	)		(61,460	)		(1,093	)		3,976			43,567
Income tax expense (benefit)(2)			(28	)		37,975			(2,041	)		1,090			4,892
(Loss) earnings before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			(68,955	)		(99,435	)		948			2,886			38,675
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes(3)			—			—			10,721			—			3,166
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes(4)			—			—			—			(2,277	)		—
Net (loss) income			($68,955	)		($99,435	)		$11,669			$609			$41,841
Basic (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.03			$0.09			$1.12
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill			—			—			0.35			—			0.09
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			—			—			—			(0.07	)		—
Basic (loss) earnings per share			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.38			$0.02			$1.21
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic			31,223			31,046			30,797			31,962			34,531
Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.03			$0.09			$1.06
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill			—			—			0.33			—			0.09
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			—			—			—			(0.07	)		—
Diluted (loss) earnings per share			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.36			$0.02			$1.15
Weighted average number of shares – diluted			31,223			31,046			31,986			32,132			36,297
Pro forma amounts assuming new accounting principles were applied retroactively:
(Loss) earnings before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported			($68,955	)		($99,435	)		$948			$2,886			$38,675
Pro forma (loss) earnings before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			(68,955	)		(99,435	)		948			2,922			38,946
Pro forma net (loss) income			(68,955	)		(99,435	)		11,669			2,922			42,122
Per share amounts:
Basic (loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.03			$0.09			$1.12
Pro forma basic (loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.03			$0.09			$1.13
Pro forma basic (loss) earnings per share			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.38			$0.09			$1.22
Diluted (loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.03			$0.09			$1.06
Pro forma diluted (loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.03			$0.09			$1.07
Pro forma diluted (loss) earnings per share			($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.36			$0.09			$1.16

																Fiscal Year Ended
		Fiscal Year Ended
		February 2,			February 3,			January 28,		January 29,			January 31,			January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008			February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006			January 29, 2005
		2008			2007			2006		2005			2004
		($ in thousands, except per share and store data)														($ in thousands, except per share and store data)
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at the end of the period):
Total assets		$	638,993		$	829,690		$   799,657		$	859,653		$	817,758		$	487,036		$	638,993		$	829,690		$	799,657		$	859,653
Current portion of long-term
debt and capital lease obligations			3,501			3,393		3,659			780			395
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations																	3,748			3,501			3,393			3,659			780
Long-term obligations			12,588			16,085		19,474			12,037			7,465			8,844			12,588			16,085			19,474			12,037
Shareholders’ equity		$	298,149		$	393,205		$   378,512		$	404,323		$	399,184		$	235,015		$	298,149		$	393,205		$	378,512		$	404,323
OPERATING DATA:
OPERATING DATA:
Store count (open at end of period):
Mall stores			610			737		546			560			595			549			610			737			546			560
Freestanding stores			203			255		236			250			286			163			203			255			236			250
Total stores			813			992		782			810			881			712			813			992			782			810
Comparable store sales (decrease) / increase(5)			(8.5%)			(6.2%)		(5.7%)			0.8%			1.3%
Comparable store sales (decrease) / increase(5)																	(10.8	%)		(8.5	%)		(6.2	%)		(5.7	%)		0.8	%
Total square footage (in thousands)			5,117			5,950		4,824			5,002			5,484			4,560			5,117			5,950			4,824			5,002

1.
1.	During Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $15.2 million and $30.7 million, respectively, to write down certain long-lived assets pursuant to SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.
2.	Included in income tax expense for Fiscal 2007 is deferred tax expense of $42.5 million, the recording of which was primarily due to the establishment of a full valuation allowance against the Company’s net deferred tax assets. See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
3.	The Company’s acquisition of substantially all of the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. stores in Fiscal 2006 and of Wherehouse Entertainment Inc. and CD World in Fiscal 2003, resulted in extraordinary gains recorded in Fiscal 2006 2004 and 2003Fiscal 2004 in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. The gains, net of tax, represented the excess of fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price of the acquired assets.
4.	The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143”, effective January 28, 2006 resulting in a one-time, non-cash, after tax charge of $2.3 million, which was classified as a “cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle” in Fiscal 2005.
5.	A store is included in comparable store sales calculations at the beginning of its thirteenth full month of operation. Mall stores relocated in the same shopping center after being open for at least thirteen months are considered comparable stores. Closed stores that were open for at least thirteen months are included in comparable store sales through the month immediately preceding the month of closing.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides information that the Company’s management believes necessary to achieve an understanding of its financial condition and results of operations. To the extent that such analysis contains statements which are not of a historical nature, such statements are forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. These risks include, but are not limited to, changes in the competitive environment for the Company’s merchandise, including the entry or exit of non-traditional retailers of the Company’s merchandise to or from its markets; releases by the music, video, and video game industries of an increased or decreased number of “hit releases”; general economic factors in markets where the Company’s merchandise is sold; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the Company operated 813712 stores totaling approximately 5.14.6 million square feet in the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 (referred to herein as “2007”“Fiscal 2008”), the Company’s net sales decreased as compared to the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007,2008, (referred to herein as “2006”“Fiscal 2007”) as a result of lower average store count and a decrease in comparable store sales. Comparable store sales decreased 8.5%10.8% during Fiscal 2007 as comparable store sales declines of greater than 20% in music were partially offset by positive comparable store sales in video, video games and accessories and related products.2008.

The Company focuses on the following areas in its effort to improve its business:

           Developing its Brand – f.y.e. brand

The brand initiative is aimed at broadening the Company’s customer base by creating a more relevant entertainment shopping experience and differentiating f.y.e. from its competition. It is centered on an engaging and personalized approach in marketing and merchandising, an interactive in-store and on-line entertainment experience and a best-in-retail-class customer service level – all designed to draw customers into stores and enhance long-term customer loyalty. In Fiscal 2007, the Company’s focus relative to the branding initiative was the rebranding of its freestanding locations to f.y.e. During Fiscal 2007, the Company rebranded 66 of its freestanding stores and as of February 2, 2008, the Company had approximately 670 f.y.e. stores in total.

Improving Merchandise Assortment and Product Mix

The Company tailors the product mix of its stores toward regional tastes in order to optimize the productivity of its stores, seeking to serve key customer segments within each store. We have also focused on creating a stronger value statement to our customers to drive additional traffic across the lease line and improve conversion. This involves tailoring the overall square footage allocation in line with a store’s trend, and increasing inventory and square footage allocations for growth categories. As music sales have continued to decline, the Company has been able to partially offset the impact by shifting square footage allocations from music to other product categories. While adding inventory in other product categories, we remain focused on improving inventory turnover.

Store Openings and Closures

During Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, the Company closed 101 and 179 stores, repositioned 7 stores and didrespectively. The Company has not open or acquire anyopened a new stores. In Fiscal 2006,store in the Company acquired 335 stores, opened 64 new stores, repositioned 15 stores and closed 189 stores, including 125last two years. The Company’s real estate strategy is to reposition our store portfolio by reducing our store base to a core group of the acquired stores.profitable locations.

The Company closes stores when minimum operating thresholds are not achieved or upon lease expiration when either renewal is not available or management determines that renewal is not in the Company’s best interest. The composition of these stores changes from time-to-time as the result of competitive changes and other factors.

Expanding Customer Base

To strengthen customer loyalty, the Company offers its customers the option of signing up for a Backstage Pass card which provides an additional 10% discount off of everyday selling prices on nearly all product in addition to other value added offers members receive through the program in exchange for an annual membership fee. The Company also co-sponsors events in many of its stores to provide various segments of its customers an opportunity to experience entertainment and shop for unique and exclusive products based on their particular interests.

Key Performance Indicators

Management monitors a number of key performance indicators to evaluate its performance, including:

Net Sales:The Company measures the rate of comparable store net sales change. A store is included in comparable store net sales calculations at the beginning of its thirteenth full month of operation. Mall stores relocated in the same shopping center after being open for at least thirteen months are considered comparable stores. Closed stores that were open for at least thirteen months are included in comparable store net sales through the month immediately precedingprior to the month of closing. The Company further analyzes net sales by store format and by product category.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit:Gross profit is a function of the cost of product in relation to its retail selling value. Changes in gross profit are impacted primarily by net sales levels, mix of products sold, vendor discounts and allowances and distribution costs. The Company records its distribution, freight and obsolescence expenses in cost of sales. Distribution expenses include those costs associated with receiving, inspecting and warehousing merchandise and costs associated with product returns to vendors.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) expenses: Included in SG&A expenses are payroll and related costs, occupancy charges, general operating and overhead expenses and depreciation charges (excluding those related to distribution operations, as discussed in Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). SG&A expenses also include fixed assets write-offs associated with store closures, if any, and miscellaneous items, other than interest.

Balance Sheet and Ratios:The Company views cash, net inventory investment (merchandise inventory less accounts payable) and working capital (current assets less current liabilities) as indicators of its financial position. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for further discussion of these items.

Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2009 (“Fiscal 2008”)

Compared to Fiscal Year Ended February 2, 2008 (“Fiscal 2007”)
Compared to Fiscal Year Ended February 3, 2007 (“2006”)

Net Sales.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s total net sales:

								2008 vs. 2007
($ in thousands)		2008			2007			$			%
Net Sales			$987,625			$1,265,658			$ (278,033)			(22.0%)

The 22% net sales decline from prior year is due to the comparable store net sales decline of 11% coupled with an 18% decline in average store count. Total product units sold in Fiscal 2008 decreased 16% and the average retail price for units sold decreased 8%.

Net sales by merchandise category for Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007 were as follows:

($ in thousands)		2008 Net Sales			% Total			2007 Net Sales			% Total			Total % Net Sales Change					Comparable Store % Net Sales Change
Music		$	349,737			35.4	%	$	494,286			39.1	%			(29.2	%)				(20.2	%)
Video			407,884			41.3			491,360			38.8				(17.0	)				(3.1	)
Video games			90,233			9.1			114,431			9.0				(21.1	)				(14.3	)
Other			139,771			14.2			165,581			13.1				(15.6	)				(0.6	)
Total		$	987,625			100.0	%	$	1,265,658			100.0	%			(22.0	%)				(10.8	%)

The “Other” category includes electronics, accessories and trend items, none of which individually exceed 10% of total net sales.

Music

The Company’s stores offer a wide range of new and used CDs and music DVDs across most music genres, including new releases from current artists as well as an extensive catalog of music from past periods and artists. The music category declined as a percentage of total net sales and declined 20.2% on a comparable store sale basis due to the lack of new product releases and the shift to online downloading. The Company continues to shift square footage allocations to new categories to compensate for the decline.

Net sales of CDs represented approximately 95% of total net sales in the music category during Fiscal 2008. The Company’s annual CD unit sales decreased 28% in Fiscal 2008 due to lower comparable store net sales and the decrease in average store count. According to SoundScan, total CD unit sales in the United States declined 20% during the period corresponding with the Company’s Fiscal 2008.

Video

The Company offers DVDs in all of its stores and high definition DVDs in a majority of its stores. The video category increased as a percentage of the Company’s total net sales due to slower comparable store sales decline in this category than the other categories.

Total net sales for Fiscal 2008 in the video category decreased 17% due to a comparable store net sales decrease of 3% and the lower average store count. According to VideoScan, total video unit sales in the United States declined 9% during the period corresponding with the Company’s Fiscal 2008.

Video games

The Company offers video game hardware and software in 347 stores. During Fiscal 2007, the Company discontinued the sale of video games in approximately 300 stores. The Company has narrowed the number of stores offering video games in order to increase average store video game sales by offering better assortment and more product in its best game sales stores.

($ in thousands)						2007 vs. 2006
		2007		2006		$		%
Net Sales		$1,265,658		$1,471,157		$(205,499)		(14.0)%

The negative comparable store sales in video games was due to a lack of allocation of product from vendors as well as a reduction in the number of stores carrying games in Fiscal 2008 versus Fiscal 2007.

Other

The “Other” category consists of electronics, accessories and trend items. Net sales in this category have increased as a percentage of total net sales due to increased store square footage allocations and slower comparable store sales declines than music and video.

Gross Profit. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s Gross Profit:

($ in thousands)								2008 vs. 2007
		2008			2007			$			%
Gross Profit		$	330,895		$	445,747		($	114,852	)		(25.8%	)
As a percentage of net sales			33.5	%		35.2	%

The 170 basis point decline in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was due to increased markdowns on slow moving inventory and lower vendor allowances.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s SG&A expenses:

($ in thousands)								2008 vs. 2007
		2008			2007			$			%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		$	380,802		$	470,386		($	89,584	)		(19.0%	)
As a percentage of net sales			38.6	%		37.2	%

The $90 million decrease in SG&A expenses is due to the Company operating an average of 18% fewer stores. Despite the decrease, SG&A as a percentage of net sales increased to 38.6% from 37.2% due to the sales decline of 22%.

Included in SG&A for Fiscal 2008 is a gain of approximately $3.1 million from the sale of the Canton, Ohio distribution facility.

Asset Impairment Charge. During Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, the Company concluded, based on a significant decline in sales and earnings during the fourth quarter, that triggering events had occurred, pursuant to SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”), requiring a test of long-lived assets for impairment at its retail stores and consolidated subsidiaries. Long-lived assets at locations where impairment was determined to exist were written down to their estimated fair values as of the end of each period resulting in the recording of asset impairment charges of $15.2 million and $30.7 million in Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, respectively. Estimated fair values for long-lived assets at these locations, including store fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets, were determined based on a measure of discounted future cash flows over the remaining lease terms at the respective locations. Future cash flows were estimated based on store plans and were discounted at a rate approximating the Company’s cost of capital. Management believes its assumptions were reasonable and consistently applied.

Interest Expense. Interest expense in Fiscal 2008 was $4.1 million compared to $6.5 million in Fiscal 2007. The increase is due to lower average borrowings on the Company’s revolving line of credit and lower interest rates.

Other Income. Other income includes interest income, which was $0.2 million and $0.4 million in Fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s income tax expense (benefit):

($ in thousands)												2008 vs. 2007
		2008					2007					$
Income tax (benefit) expense				($28	)			$	37,975				($38,003)
Effective tax rate				0.0	%				(61.8	%)

During Fiscal 2007 the Company recorded deferred tax expense of $42.5 million, which was primarily due to the establishment of a full valuation allowance against the Company’s net deferred tax assets. This was partially offset by a $5.7 million federal income tax benefit recognized as the result of a net operating loss carryback. The remaining components of income tax expense, totaling approximately $1.2 million, include certain state and local taxes, adjustments to the reserve for uncertain tax positions and the accrual of interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions. See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.

Net Loss. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s net loss:

($ in thousands)								2008 vs. 2007
		2008			2007			$
Net loss			($ 68,955	)		($ 99,435	)		$30,480
Net loss as a percentage of net sales			(7.0	%)		(7.9	%)

The Fiscal 2008 net loss of $69.0 million was due to the decline in comparable store sales and the impairment charge of $15.2 million. The $30.5 million reduction in net loss as compared to 2007 was due to a lower impairment charge and the $42.5 million deferred tax charge recorded in Fiscal 2007, partially offset by lower sales and the 170 basis point decrease in gross margin.

Fiscal Year Ended February 2, 2008 (“Fiscal 2007”)
Compared to Fiscal Year Ended February 3, 2007 (“Fiscal 2006”)

Net Sales. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s total net sales:

($ in thousands)								2007 vs. 2006
		2007			2006			$			%
Net Sales			$1,265,658			$1,471,157			$ (205,499)			(14.0%)

The 14% net sales decline from prior year is due to the comparable store net sales decline of 8.5% coupled with a 6.6% decline in average store count. Additionally, Fiscal 2006 contained a 53^rdweek of business which contributed approximately $23.0 million in net sales. Total product units sold in Fiscal 2007 decreased 14.5% and the average retail price for units sold increased 1.4%.

Net sales by merchandise category for Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006 were as follows:

												Total %			Comparable
($ in thousands)		2007		%			2006		%			Net Sales			Store % Net			2007 Net Sales			% Total			2006 Net Sales			% Total			Total % Net Sales Change					Comparable Store % Net Sales Change
		Net Sales		Total			Net Sales		Total			Change			Sales Change
Music		$494,286		39.1	%		$676,091		46.0	%		(26.9	)%		(23.2	)%		$	494,286			39.1	%	$	676,091			46.0	%			(26.9	%)				(23.2	%)
Video		491,360		38.8			529,900		36.0			(7.3	)		1.1				491,360			38.8			529,900			36.0				(7.3	)				1.1
Video games		114,431		9.0			114,654		7.8			(0.2	)		8.3				114,431			9.0			114,654			7.8				(0.2	)				8.3
Other		165,581		13.1			150,512		10.2			10.0			14.2				165,581			13.1			150,512			10.2				10.0					14.2
Total		$1,265,658		100.0	%		$1,471,157		100.0	%		(14.0	)%		(8.5	)%		$	1,265,658			100.0	%	$	1,471,157			100.0	%			(14.0	%)				(8.5	%)

The “Other” category includes electronics, accessories and trend items, none of which individually exceed 10% of total net sales.

Music

The Company’s stores offer a wide range of new and used CDs and music DVDs across most music genres, including new releases from current artists as well as an extensive catalog of music from past periods and artists. The music category declined as a percentage of total net sales and declined 23.2% on a comparable store sale basis due to the lack of new product releases and the shift to online downloading. The Company continues to shift square footage allocations to growth categories to compensate for the decline.

Net sales of CDs represented approximately 95% of total net sales in the music category during Fiscal 2007. The Company’s annual CD unit sales decreased 26% in Fiscal 2007 due to lower comparable store net sales and the decrease in average store count. According to Soundscan,SoundScan, total CD unit sales in the United States declined 19% during the period corresponding with the Company’s Fiscal 2007.

Video

The Company offers DVDs and high definition DVDs in all its stores. The video category increased as a percentage of the Company’s total net sales due to the increase in store square footage to support the category.

Total net sales for Fiscal 2007 in the video category decreased 7.3% despite the comparable store net sales increase of 1.1% due to the lower average store count. According to Soundscan,VideoScan, total video unit sales in the United States declined 3% during the period corresponding with the Company’s Fiscal 2007.

Video games

The Company offers video game hardware and software in approximately half its stores. During Fiscal 2007, the Company discontinued the sale of video games in approximately 300 stores. The Company has narrowed the number of stores offering video games in order to increase total video game sales by offering better assortment and more product in its best game sales stores.

The positive comparable store net sales in video games were due to improved hardware allocations of Wii, PS3 and Nintendo DS Lite, as well as improved software sales. According to the NPD, Group, industry video games sales during calendar year 2007, including portable and console hardware, software and accessories increased 43% over calendar year 2006 sales.

Other

The “Other” category consists of electronics, accessories and trend items. Net sales in this category have increased as a percentage of total net sales due to increased store square footage allocations which have driven double digit comparable store net sales growth.

Gross Profit.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s Gross Profit:

($ in thousands)						2007 vs. 2006										2007 vs. 2006
		2007		2006		$		%
										2007			2006			$			%
Gross Profit		$ 445,747		$ 519,222		$ (73,475)		(14.2)%		$	445,747		$	519,222			$ (73,475)			(14.2%)
As a percentage of net
sales		35.2%		35.3%
As a percentage of net sales											35.2	%		35.3	%

The 10 basis point decline in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was due to a loss of leverage of distribution and freight costs against the net sales decline.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s SG&A expenses:

($ in thousands)						2007 vs. 2006
		2007		2006		$		%
Selling, general and
administrative expenses		$ 470,386		$ 519,246		$ (48,860)		(9.4)%
As a percentage of net
sales		37.2%		35.3%

($ in thousands)								2007 vs. 2006
		2007			2006			$			%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		$	470,386		$	519,246			$ (48,860)			(9.4%)
As a percentage of net sales			37.2	%		35.3	%

The $48.9 million decrease in SG&A expenses is due to the lower average store count and the absence of approximately $7.9 million in transition costs related to the Musicland acquisition that were incurred in Fiscal 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales is due to a loss of leverage on fixed costs due to the net sales decline.

Asset Impairment Charge.During Fiscal 2007, the Company concluded, based on a significant decline in sales and earnings during the fourth quarter, that triggering events had occurred, pursuant to SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets(“ (“SFAS No. 144”)., requiring a test of long-lived assets for impairment at its retail stores and consolidated subsidiaries. Long-lived assets at locations where impairment was determined to exist were written down to their estimated fair values as of February 2, 2008, resulting in the recording of an asset impairment charge of $30.7 million. Estimated fair values for long-lived assets at these locations, including store fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets, were determined based on a measure of discounted future cash flows over the remaining lease terms at the respective locations. Future cash flows were estimated based on store operating plans and were discounted at a rate approximating the Company’s cost of capital. Management believes its assumptions were reasonable and consistently applied.

Interest Expense.Interest expense in Fiscal 2007 was $6.5 million compared to $5.5 million in Fiscal 2006. The increase is due to higher average borrowings on the Company’s revolving line of credit.credit facility.

Other Income.Other income includes interest income, which was $0.4 million and $0.9 million in Fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Fiscal 2006 other income also includes a $3.5 million gain on the sale of an investment.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit).The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s income tax expense (benefit):

($ in thousands)						2007 vs. 2006								2007 vs. 2006
		2007		2006		$
								2007			2006			$
Income tax expense (benefit)		$  37,975		$  (2,041)		$  40,016		$	37,975		$	(2,041	)		$ 40,016
Effective tax rate		(61.8)%		186.7%					(61.8	%)		186.7	%

During Fiscal 2007 the Company recorded deferred tax expense of $42.5 million, which was primarily due to the establishment of a full valuation allowance against the Company’s net deferred tax assets. This was partially offset by a $5.7 million federal income tax benefit recognized as the result of a net operating loss carryback. The remaining components of income tax expense, totaling approximately $1.2 million, include certain state and local taxes, adjustments to the reserve for uncertain tax positions and the accrual of interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions. See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.

The Fiscal 2006 income tax benefit is attributable to a tax favored gain from the sale of an investment, which resulted in a $1.4 million reduction of the valuation allowance attributable to losses on investments, favorable settlements of income tax examinations ($0.9 million) and federal income tax credits ($0.3 million), partially offset by unfavorable state tax legislation enacted during the year and changes in management’s

estimates of the realization of state net operating losses. For a reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate, see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Extraordinary Gain.In Fiscal 2006, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain of $10.7 million, net of income taxes of $6.7 million, as a result of acquiring substantially all of the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. on March 27, 2006. The gain represented the excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired over the purchase price of the acquired assets.

Net (Loss) Income.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s net (loss) income:

($ in thousands)
									2007 vs. 2006
			2007			2006			$
(Loss) income before extraordinary gain – unallocated
negative goodwill		$	(99,435	)	$	948		$	(100,383	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net
of income taxes of $0 and $6,739 for Fiscal 2007 and
2006, respectively			---			10,721		$	(10,721	)
Net (loss) income		$	(99,435)		$	11,669		$	(111,104	)
Net (loss) income as a percentage of net sales			(7.9)%			0.8%

($ in thousands)
								2007 vs. 2006
		2007			2006			$
(Loss) income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill		$	(99,435	)	$	948		$	(100,383	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes of $0 and $6,739 for Fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively			—			10,721		$	(10,721	)
Net (loss) income		$	(99,435	)	$	11,669		$	(111,104	)
Net (loss) income as a percentage of net sales			(7.9	%)		0.8	%

The Fiscal 2007 net loss of $99.4 million was due, in large part, to the impairment charge of $30.7 million and $42.5 million in deferred tax expense associated with establishing the valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets. In addition, the 14% net sales decline and 10 basis point gross margin decline from prior year contributed to an approximate $73.5 million decrease in gross profit dollars, which was partially offset by a $48.9 million decrease in SG&A expenses. Fiscal year 2006 net income also included a $3.5 million gain on the sale of an investment.

Fiscal Year Ended February 3, 2007 (“2006”)
Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 28, 2006 (“2005”)

Net Sales.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s total net sales:

($ in thousands)						2006 vs. 2005
		2006		2005		$		%
Net Sales		$1,471,157		$1,238,486		$  232,671		18.8%

Net sales increased in Fiscal 2006 due to an increase in the average store count. Due to the Musicland acquisition, average store count increased from 801 in Fiscal 2005 to 1,024 in Fiscal 2006. Additionally, the 53^rd week of business in Fiscal 2006 contributed approximately $23.0 million in net sales. These factors were partially offset by a comparable store net sales decrease of 6.2% . Non-comparable store net sales for Fiscal 2006 and 2005 were $349.5 million and $37.6 million, respectively. Total product units sold in Fiscal 2006 increased 13.4% over Fiscal 2005, and the average retail price for units sold increased 3.8% as a larger portion of the Company’s total units sold represented DVDs, video games and electronics which, in general, sell at higher average retail unit prices than CDs.

Net sales by merchandise category for Fiscal 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

												Total %			Comparable
($ in thousands)		2006		%			2005		%			Net Sales			Store % Net
		Net Sales		Total			Net Sales		Total			Change			Sales Change
Music		$676,091		46.0	%		$663,712		53.6	%		1.9	%		(14.0	)%
Video		529,900		36.0			371,965		30.0			42.5			1.2
Video games		114,654		7.8			90,408		7.3			26.8			4.0
Other		150,512		10.2			112,401		9.1			33.9			7.9
Total		$1,471,157		100.0	%		$1,238,486		100.0	%		18.8	%		(6.2	)%

The “Other” category includes electronics, accessories and trend items, none of which individually exceed 10% of total net sales.

           Music

The Company’s stores offer a wide range of new and used CDs and music DVDs across most music genres, including new releases from current artists as well as an extensive catalog of music from past periods and artists. The music category represented 46.0% of the Company’s net sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 53.6% in Fiscal 2005. The music category declined as a percentage of total net sales due to a shift in square footage allocations to higher growth categories and due to the acquisition of over 160 video only Suncoast Motion Pictures stores in March 2006 which shifted a larger portion of total net sales into the video category.

On a comparable store basis, music net sales declined 14.0% due to continued industry sales declines and the aforementioned shift in store square footage allocations. According to Soundscan, total CD unit sales in the United States declined 9% during the period corresponding with the Company’s Fiscal 2006.

           Video

The Company offers DVDs in all its stores. The video category represented 36.0% of the Company’s net sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 30.0% in Fiscal 2005. The majority of the increase was due to the addition of the video only Suncoast Motion Pictures stores in March 2006. The increase was also partially due to the increase in store square footage to support the video category.

Total net sales for Fiscal 2006 in the video category, including DVD and VHS, increased 42.5% from $372.0 million in Fiscal 2005 to $529.9 million in Fiscal 2006. The total net sales increase in video was due to the addition of the Suncoast Motion Pictures stores, a greater average store count and an increase in comparable store net sales.

Comparable store net sales, during Fiscal 2006, increased 5.5% in the DVD category. Comparable store net sales in the total video category, including VHS, increased only 1.2% due to the declining VHS category as the Company discontinued carrying VHS during Fiscal 2006. The increase in DVD comparable store net sales reflected the increase in inventory and floor space to support growth in this category. According to statistics obtained from Rentrak Video Essentials, overall video sales in calendar year 2006, including DVD and VHS, were $15.9 billion, a decrease of 1% from 2005. DVD retail sales in calendar year 2006 were $15.7 billion, flat compared to 2005.

           Video games

During Fiscal 2006 the Company offered video game hardware and software in most of its stores. Total net sales in the video game category increased 26.8% from $90.4 million in Fiscal 2005 to $114.7 million in Fiscal 2006 and represented 7.8% of the Company’s total net sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 7.3% in Fiscal 2005.

Comparable store net sales in the video games category increased 4.0% in Fiscal 2006. The increase was due to the release of Sony’s Play Station 3 and Nintendo’s Wii in November 2006 and Microsoft’s Xbox 360 which was released in November 2005. According to the NPD Group, video games sales during calendar year 2006, including portable and console hardware, software and accessories increased 19% over calendar year 2005 sales.

           Other

The “Other” category consists of electronics, accessories and trend items and represented 10.2% of total net sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 9.1% in Fiscal 2005. Total net sales in this category increased 33.9% to $150.5 million in Fiscal 2006 compared to $112.4 million in Fiscal 2005. This increase was due to the increase in average store count and a comparable store net sale increase of 7.9% .

Gross Profit.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s Gross Profit:

($ in thousands)						2006 vs. 2005
		2006		2005		$		%
Gross Profit		$ 519,222		$ 431,613		$ 87,609		20.3%
As a percentage of net
sales		35.3%		34.9%

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased 40 basis points in Fiscal 2006 as compared to Fiscal 2005 due to higher overall product margins (20 basis points) and the leveraging of distribution expenses against the total net sales increase (20 basis points).

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s SG&A expenses:

($ in thousands)						2006 vs. 2005
		2006		2005		$		%
Selling, general and
administrative expenses		$ 519,246		$ 426,854		$ 92,392		21.6%
As a percentage of net
sales		35.3%		34.5%

The Company’s SG&A expenses increased in Fiscal 2006 due to the operation of a greater number of stores. The Company operated an average of 1,024 stores in Fiscal 2006 compared to an average of 801 stores in Fiscal 2005, an increase of 28%. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 80 basis points, due to the recording of $7.9 million in transition costs related to the Musicland acquisition and a comparable store net sales decrease of 6.2% .

Interest Expense.Interest expense in Fiscal 2006 was $5.5 million compared to $3.0 million in Fiscal 2005. The increase was due to increased borrowings on the Company’s line of credit to fund the Musicland acquisition, along with higher variable interest rates.

Other Income.Other income includes interest income, which was $0.9 million and $1.4 million in Fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. For Fiscal 2006, other income also included a $3.5 million gain on the sale of an investment. For Fiscal 2005, other income also included a realized gain of $0.8 million on the sale of available-for-sale securities.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s income tax (benefit) expense:

($ in thousands)										2006 vs. 2005
		2006				2005				$
Income tax expense (benefit)		$	(2,041	)		$	1,090			$  (3,131)
Effective tax rate			186.7	%			27.4	%

The Fiscal 2006 income tax benefit was attributable to a tax favored gain from the sale of an investment, which resulted in a $1.4 million reduction of the valuation allowance attributable to losses on investments, favorable settlements of income tax examinations ($0.9 million) and federal income tax credits ($0.3 million), partially offset by unfavorable state tax legislation enacted during the year and changes in management’s estimates of the realization of state net operating losses. For a reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate, see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

For Fiscal 2005, the Company’s effective tax rate was negatively impacted by changes in Ohio State tax legislation. The legislation phased out state corporation franchise taxes which are based on income. The impact of the Ohio tax legislation resulted in an increase in the state valuation allowance of $1.9 million, associated with deferred tax assets, principally net operating losses that, based on management’s estimates, will not be realized during the phase-out period. Additionally, the valuation allowance was increased by $0.9 million to reserve for deferred tax assets attributable to state net operating losses impacted as a result of projected lower future taxable income within certain states’ expiration periods. During Fiscal 2005, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $2.0 million attributable to the effect of additional deductible temporary differences.

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle.The Company adopted FIN 47,Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, effective January 28, 2006. In accordance with FIN 47, the Company recorded an asset and a corresponding liability for the present value of the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at its store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases. The Company recognized an expense for the cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2005 of $2.3 million, net of income taxes of $1.5 million.

Extraordinary Gain.In Fiscal 2006, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain as a result of acquiring substantially all of the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. on March 27, 2006. From March 27, 2006 to February 3, 2007, the Company allocated the purchase price in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations, resulting in an extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill of $10.7 million, net of income taxes $6.7 million. The extraordinary gain represents the excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price. The purchase price was allocated on a preliminary basis during the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2006 using information available at the time. The extraordinary gain recorded as of April 29, 2006 was $0.9 million, which was net of income taxes of $0.7 million. In accordance with SFAS No.141, the allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities acquired must be finalized within twelve months following the date of acquisition. Accordingly, the purchase price allocation has been adjusted between April 29, 2006 and February 3, 2007, resulting in an adjustment to the extraordinary gain of $9.8 million, which is net of income taxes of $6.0 million. The pre-tax increase in the extraordinary gain from April 29, 2006 to February 3, 2007 represents adjustments to the value of acquired inventory ($1.9 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to the former Musicland loyalty program ($3.4 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to gift cards based on the redemption experience since acquisition ($6.1 million) and an adjustment to occupancy related expenses ($1.5 million) and an adjustment to the cash purchase price ($2.9 million).

Net Income.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s net income:

($ in thousands)											2006 vs. 2005
			2006				2005				$			%
Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative
goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle		$	948			$	2,886			$	(1,938	)		(67.2	%)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net
of income taxes of $6,739 and $0 for 2006 and
2005, respectively			10,721				---
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of
income taxes of $0 and $1,505 for 2006 and 2005 ,
respectively			---				(2,277	)
Net income		$	11,669			$	609			$	11,060			1,816.1	%
Net income as a percentage of net sales			0.8	%			0.1	%

Income before extraordinary items decreased to $0.9 million in Fiscal 2006 as increased sales and gross profit associated with the increased average store count was not enough to offset a 6.2% decline in comparable store sales and the increase in SG&A expenses, including integration expenses of $7.9 million related to the Musicland acquisition. Income before extraordinary items in Fiscal 2006 was positively impacted by an income tax benefit of $2.0 million. The increase in net income in Fiscal 2006 is due to the extraordinary gain, net of tax, of $10.7 million recorded in relation to the Musicland acquisition.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity and Cash Flows:The Company’s primary sources of working capital are cash provided by operationssales of merchandise inventory and borrowing capacity under its revolving credit facility. The Company’s cash flows fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to various items, including seasonality of sales and earnings, merchandise inventory purchases and returns and the related terms on the purchases store openings, tax payments and capital expenditures. Management believes it will have adequate resources to fund its cash needs for the foreseeable future, including its capital spending, its seasonal increase in merchandise inventory income tax payments and other operating cash requirements and commitments. Management has considered many initiatives as part of the development of its operating plan for 2009 and beyond that focus on the operation of a core base of stores, improved product selection based on customer preferences and industry changes, as well as further streamlining of its operations. During Fiscal 2008, management carried out certain strategic initiatives in its efforts to reduce certain operating costs such as the closure of the Canton, OH distribution center, reduction of headcount at the home office and the Albany, NY distribution center, as well as the elimination or curtailment of certain other general and administrative expenses. Also, during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008, management closed 74 stores and plans to continue its careful evaluation of store profitability of its remaining 712 stores in consideration of lease terms, conditions and expirations. As a consequence of these further actions, the liquidation of the merchandise inventory from closed stores and management of overall merchandise inventory levels, management expects improvement in its operating cash flow during Fiscal 2009.

Management anticipates any cash requirements due to a shortfall in cash from operations wouldwill be funded by the Company’s revolving credit facility, discussed hereafter. During the 4^th quarter of Fiscal 2007, management closed 149 stores. Due to the anticipated liquidation of the merchandise inventory from these stores and management of merchandise inventory levels, management expects improvements in working capital during Fiscal 2008. Cash flows from investing and financing activities during Fiscal 20082009 are expected to be comparable with Fiscal 2007. Management is not currently aware of any trends, uncertainties or other significant events that would cause liquidity to decrease or increase in a material way. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that the Company will be able to maintain its ability to borrow under its revolving credit facility.2008. The Company does not expect any material changes in the mix (between equity and debt) or the relative cost of capital resources. See Item 1A, Risk Factors, “Disruption of the global capital and credit markets may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity and capital resources.”

The following table sets forth a three year summary of key components of cash flow and working capital:

																																		2008 vs. 2007									2007 vs. 2006
											2007 vs. 2006											2006 vs. 2005
($ in thousands)			2007				2006				$			%				2005				$			%			2008			2007			$			%			2006			$			%
Operating Cash Flows		$	(25,579	)		$	47,268			$	(72,847	)		(154	%)		$	25,247			$	22,021			87	%		($	37,232	)	($	25,579	)	($	11,653	)		(46	%)	$	47,268		($	72,847	)		(154	%)
Investing Cash Flows			(15,949	)			(122,871	)			106,922			87	%			(40,517	)			(82,354	)		(203	%)			(3,873	)		(15,949	)		12,076			76	%		(122,871	)		106,922			87	%
Financing Cash Flows			(2,447	)			(2,976	)			529			18	%			(17,289	)			14,313			83	%			(3,495	)		(2,447	)		(1,048	)		(43	%)		(2,976	)		529			18	%
Capital Expenditures			(15,949	)			(48,289	)			32,340			67	%			(41,330	)			(6,959	)		(17	%)			(10,066	)		(15,949	)		5,883			37	%		(48,289	)		32,340			67	%
Acquisition of Business			---				(78,810	)			78,810			100	%			---				(78,810	)		---				—			—			—			—			(78,810	)		78,810			100	%
Cash and Cash Equivalents			74,655				118,630				(43,975	)		(37	%)			197,209				(78,579	)		(40	%)			30,055			74,655			(44,600	)		(60	%)		118,630			(43,975	)		(37	%)
Merchandise Inventory			440,241				504,860				(64,619	)		(13	%)			402,712				102,148			25	%			378,188			440,241			(62,053	)		(14	%)		504,860			(64,619	)		(13	%)
Working Capital			251,507				266,204				(14,697	)		(6	%)			273,623				(7,419	)		(3	%)			213,389			251,507			(38,118	)		(15	%)		266,204			(14,697	)		(6	%)
Inventory turns			1.7				1.8											1.9											1.6			1.7									1.8

The $11.7 million decrease in operating cash flows was due to a loss from operations of $49.9 million, exclusive of the $15.2 million non-cash impairment charge, compared to a loss from operations of $26.2 million, exclusive of the $30.7 million non-cash impairment charge and $42.5 million deferred tax charge recorded during Fiscal 2007 partially offset by fluctuation of operating assets and liabilities, within the normal course of business, during Fiscal 2008.

The Company monitors various statistics to measure its management of inventory, including inventory turn (annual cost of sales divided by average merchandise inventory balances), inventory investment per square foot and inventory leverage (accounts payable divided by merchandise inventory). Inventory turn in Fiscal 2008 was 1.6 compared to 1.7 in Fiscal 2007. Inventory investment per square foot was $83 per square foot at the end of Fiscal 2008 as compared to $86 per square foot at the end of Fiscal 2007. Inventory leverage was 45% as of January 31, 2009 compared with 54% as of February 3, 2008. Management considers these results to be consistent with historical performance.

Cash used in investing activities was $3.9 million in Fiscal 2008, compared to $15.9 million in Fiscal 2007. During Fiscal 2008, cash used in investing activities consisted of capital expenditures of $10.1 million, partially offset by proceeds of $6.2 from the sale of the Company’s distribution facility in Canton, Ohio. During Fiscal 2007, cash used in investing activities consisted exclusively of capital expenditures of $15.9 million. The Company’s capital expenditures in Fiscal 2008 included approximately $6.6 million for store remodels and merchandising projects. The remaining capital expenditures were primarily for general IT software and equipment.

The Company has historically financed its capital expenditures through borrowings under its credit facility, select financing arrangements and cash generated from sales of merchandise inventory. It may also receive landlord allowances or concessions for store openings, relocations or improvements. The Company anticipates capital spending of approximately $10 million in Fiscal 2009.

Cash used in financing activities was $3.5 million in Fiscal 2008, compared to a $2.4 million in Fiscal 2007. In Fiscal 2008, the primary uses of cash were payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $0.5 million and $3.0 million. In Fiscal 2007, the primary uses of cash were payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $0.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively, partially offset by $0.9 million in proceeds and excess tax benefits received from the exercise of stock awards.

During Fiscal 2007, the $72.8 million decrease in operating cash flows from Fiscal 2006 was due, in part, to a loss from operations of $24.6 million, exclusive of the $30.7 million non-cash impairment charge, compared to a loss from operations of $24 thousand during Fiscal 2006. Additionally, the change in net merchandise inventory (merchandise inventory less accounts payable) represented a cash use of $3.8 million in Fiscal 2007 compared to a cash source of $14.3 million in Fiscal 2006 due to a lower inventory leverage ratio. The Company also made a final principal and interest payment of approximately $7.4 million in settlement of an agreement with the IRSInternal Revenue Service (“IRS”) during the second quarter of Fiscal 2007. The remaining change is due to the fluctuation of operating assets and liabilities, within the normal course of business, during Fiscal 2007.

The Company monitors various statistics to measure its management of inventory, including inventory turn (annual cost of sales divided by average merchandise inventory balances), inventory investment per square foot and inventory leverage (accounts payable divided by merchandise inventory). Inventory turn in Fiscal 2007 was 1.7 compared to 1.8 in Fiscal 2006. Inventory investment per square foot was $86 per square foot at the end of Fiscal 2007 as compared to $85 per square foot at the end of Fiscal 2006. Inventory leverage was 54% as of February 2, 2008 compared with 61% as of February 3, 2007. Management considers these results to be consistent with historical performance and does not anticipate large fluctuations in merchandise inventory or accounts payable balances in the foreseeable future.

Cash used in investing activities was $15.9 million in Fiscal 2007, compared to $122.9 million in Fiscal 2006. Cash used in investing activities consisted exclusively of capital expenditures during Fiscal 2007, while cash uses during Fiscal 2006 included the acquisition of assets from Musicland Holding Corp. The Company’s capital expenditures in Fiscal 2007 included approximately $9.9 million for store relocations, remodels and merchandising projects. The remaining capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion of LVS 3 (Listening and Viewing Stations) and for general MIS software and equipment.

In Fiscal 2006, the primary uses of cash in investing activities were $48.3 million for capital expenditures and $78.8 million for the acquisition of the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. These uses were partially offset by proceeds from the sale of an investment of approximately $4.2 million. The Company had capital expenditures in 2006 of $25.1 million for new store openings, relocations and store improvements, including improvements to acquired Musicland stores. An additional $5.3 million was invested in the expansion of LVS 3 to a greater number of stores. Another $13.5 million was invested in general MIS software and equipment. Other capital expenditures totaled $4.4 million.

The Company has historically financed its capital expenditures through cash generated from operations. It may also receive landlord allowances or concessions for store openings, relocations or improvements. The Company anticipates capital spending of approximately $15 million in 2008.

Cash used in financing activities was $2.4 million in Fiscal 2007, compared to a $3.0 million use of cash in Fiscal 2006. In Fiscal 2007, the primary uses of cash were payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $0.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively, partially offset by $0.9 million in proceeds and excess tax benefits received from the exercise of stock awards. In Fiscal 2006, the primary uses of cash were payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $0.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively, partially offset by $0.7 million in proceeds and excess tax benefits received from the exercise of stock awards.

Cash from operating activities increased by approximately $22.0 million in Fiscal 2006 compared to Fiscal 2005. The most significant factor driving the increase was the decrease (cash source) in net merchandise inventory (merchandise inventory less accounts payable) as compared to Fiscal 2005, excluding the merchandise inventory acquired in the Musicland acquisition. The change in net inventory provided cash of approximately $14.3 million in Fiscal 2006, compared to a cash use of approximately $10.2 million in Fiscal 2005, resulting in a $24.5 million increase in cash from operating activities. This was partially offset by a decrease in income before depreciation, amortization, stock compensation and gains and losses for which proceeds are presented in investing activities of approximately $2.6 million. Additional cash uses of approximately $2.9 million for accrued expenses and changes in prepaid expenses and other assets resulting in decreases in cash from operating activities of approximately $2.0 million, as compared to Fiscal 2005, were offset by changes in accounts receivable resulting in an increase in cash from operating activities of approximately $3.3 million and changes in current and deferred taxes resulting an increase in cash from operating activities of approximately $1.5 million.

In January, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year, $100 million revolving secured Credit Agreementcredit facility with Bank of America, N.A that expires January 2011.2011 (“Credit Facility”). The revolving credit facility contains provisions governing additional indebtedness and acquisitions and is secured by the Company’s eligible inventory, proceeds from the sale of inventory and by the stock of the Company’s subsidiaries. In March 2006, the Company and Bank of America N.A., entered into a First Amendment to the Credit AgreementFacility which increased the amount available for borrowing by the Company under the Credit AgreementFacility to $130 million and in October 2006, the Company and Bank of America N.A. entered into a Second Amendment to the Credit AgreementFacility increasing the amount available to the Company for borrowing to $150 million. The terms and conditions under the amendments were the same as the original Credit Agreement.Facility. The availability under the Credit Facility is subject to limitations

based on sufficient inventory levels.

As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, the Company had $0didn’t have any borrowings under the line of credit and $36 thousand, respectively, inno outstanding letter of credit obligations under the credit agreementsCredit Facility with Bank of America, N.A. The Company had $150.0 million available for borrowing as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008. Interest expense in Fiscal 2008 and February 3, 2007.was $4.1 million, of which $1.9 million was incurred for capital leases. Interest expense in Fiscal 2007 was $6.5 million, of which $2.0 million was incurred for capital leases. Interest expense

The recent distress in Fiscal 2006 was $5.5 million,the financial markets has resulted in declines in consumer confidence and spending, extreme volatility in securities prices, diminished liquidity and credit availability. If the national, or global, economies or credit market conditions in general were to deteriorate further in the future, it is possible that such deterioration could put additional pressure on consumer spending and further negatively affect our cash flows. Although we have available borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility through January 6, 2011, tightening of the credit markets could also make it more difficult for us to enter into agreements for new indebtedness or obtain funding through the issuance of our securities. The Company’s ability to obtain a new credit facility or other financing arrangements will depend upon future performance and financial condition, credit market conditions, and the availability of financing which, in turn, will be subject to general economic, financial, business, competitive legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of which $2.1 million was incurredare beyond the Company’s control. The effects of these changes could also require us to make additional changes to our current plans and strategy. Additionally, although our levels of net cash provided by operating activities have been negatively affected by general economic conditions, we believe that our available cash and borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility, along with any positive cash flow generated from operations, will provide sufficient capital needed to fund our operations for capital leases.the foreseeable future.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments. The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations as of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, and the effect that such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flows in future periods.

Contractual						2009-			2011 -			2013 and
Obligation			2008			2010			2012			Beyond			Total
$ in thousands
Operating lease and maintenance
agreement obligations		$	96,977		$	113,617		$	50,480		$	36,130		$	297,204
Capital lease obligations			4,841			7,682			4,190			5,794			22,507
Long-term debt (principal)			537			1,176			1,326			1,050			4,089
Long-term debt (interest)			230			359			209			47			845
Purchase obligations (1)			---			---			---			---			---
Other long-term liabilities (2)			2,200			1,858			626			765			5,449
Pension benefits (3)			51			165			1,499			6,749			8,464
Total		$	104,836		$	124,857		$	58,330		$	50,535		$	338,558

Contractual Obligation		2009			2010- 2011			2012 - 2013			2014 and Beyond			Total
$ in thousands
Operating lease and maintenance agreement obligations		$	80,048		$	82,261		$	36,887		$	21,144		$	220,340
Capital lease obligations			4,841			4,936			4,190			3,700			17,667
Long-term debt (principal)			570			1,248			1,408			330			3,556
Long-term debt (interest)			197			286			127			5			615
Purchase obligations(1)			—			—			—			—			—
Other long-term liabilities(2)			2,501			1,489			389			487			4,866
Pension benefits(3)			64			244			2,201			5,683			8,192
Total		$	88,221		$	90,464		$	45,202		$	31,349		$	255,236

(1)	For the purposes of this table, contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The Company’s purchase orders are based on its current inventory needs and are fulfilled by its suppliers within short time periods.
(2)	Included in other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 are unfavorable lease valuations of $1.4$0.7 million and the long-term portion of deferred rent of $5.1$3.7 million which are not reflected in the table above as these amounts do not represent contractual obligations. Also included in other long-term liabilities is the long-term portion of the straight line rent liability of $5.2$3.6 million, which is included in operating lease obligations in the table above.
	Included in other long-term liabilities in the table above are the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at the Company’s store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases.
(3)	In addition to the scheduled pension benefit payments, the Company offers a 401(k) Savings Plan to eligible employees (see also Note 8 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Total expense related to the Company’s matching contribution was approximately $882,000, $1,042,000 $1,003,000 and $957,000 in Fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively. The Company expects to expense and fund an amount$1,003,000 in Fiscal 2008, that is comparable to these historical amounts, however, is not contractually obligated to do soFiscal 2007 and as such, no amount is recorded inFiscal 2006 respectively. As of February 1, 2009, the table above.Company has postponed its matching contribution.

Related Party Transactions.

The Company leases its 181,300 square foot distribution center/office facility in Albany, New York from Robert J. Higgins, its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and largest shareholder, under three capital leases that expire in the year 2015. The original distribution center/office facility was occupied in 1985.

Under the three capital leases, dated April 1, 1985, November 1, 1989 and September 1, 1998, (the “Leases”), the Company paid Mr. Higgins an annual rent of $2.0$2.1 million, $2.0 million and $1.9$2.0 million in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 respectively. Pursuant to the terms of the lease agreements, effective January 1, 2002 and every two years thereafter, rental payments will increase in accordance with the biennial increase in the Consumer Price Index. Under the terms of the lease agreements, the Company is responsible for property taxes, insurance and other operating costs with respect to the premises. Mr. Higgins’ obligation for principal and interest on his underlying indebtedness relating to the real property is approximately $1.1 million per year. None of the leases contain any real property purchase options at the expiration of its term.

The Company leases oneof its retail stores from Mr. Higgins under an operating lease. Annual rental payments under this lease were $40,000 in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005.2006. Under the terms of the lease, the Company pays property taxes, maintenance and a contingent rental if a specified sales level is achieved. Total additional charges for the store, including contingent rent, were approximately $7,400, $3,800 $4,100 and $4,400$4,100 in Fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 and 2005 respectively.

The Company occasionally utilizes privately chartered aircraft owned or partially owned by Mr. Higgins, for Company business. The Company charters an aircraft from Crystal Jet, a corporation wholly-owned by Mr. Higgins, for Company business. Payments to Crystal Jet aggregated approximately $0, $11,000$0 and $6,000$11,000 in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively. The Company also charters an aircraft from Richmor Aviation Inc., an unaffiliated corporation that leases an aircraft owned by Mr. Higgins, for Company business. Payments to Richmor Aviation Inc., to charter the aircraft owned by Mr. Higgins, in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 were approximately $205,000, $29,000 and $526,000, and $276,000, respectively.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that management apply accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect results of operations and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its estimates and judgments including those related to merchandise inventory and return costs, valuation of long-lived assets, income taxes, stock-based compensation, and accounting for gift card liability. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Management believes that of the Company’s significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity:

Merchandise Inventory and Return Costs: Merchandise inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market under the average cost method. The average cost method attaches a cost to each item and is a blended average of the original purchase price and those of subsequent purchases or other cost adjustments throughout the life cycle of that item.

Inventory valuation requires significant judgment and estimates, including obsolescence, shrink and any adjustments to market value, if market value is lower than cost. Inherent in the entertainment software industry is the risk of obsolete inventory. Typically, newer releases generate a higher product demand. Some vendors offer credits to reduce the cost of products that are selling more slowly, thus allowing for a reduction in the selling price and reducing the possibility for items to become obsolete. The Company records obsolescence and any adjustments to market value (if lower than cost) based on current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, and market conditions. The provision for inventory shrink is estimated as a percentage of sales for the period from the last date a physical inventory was performed to the end of the fiscal year. Such estimates are based on historical results and trends and the shrink results from the last physical inventory. Physical inventories are taken at least annually for all stores and distribution centers throughout the year and inventory records are adjusted accordingly.

Shrink expense, including obsolescence was $18.0 million, $18.5 million $14.9 million and $15.1$14.9 million, in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 respectively. As a rate to net sales, this equaled 1.5%1.8%, 1.0%1.5% and 1.2%1.0%, respectively. Shrink expense, including obsolescence, as a percentage of net sales was higher in Fiscal 20072008 than in prior years due to higher shrink rates in our stores and the write down of obsolete inventory in the Company’s video game category due to the narrowing of stores offering video games.category. Presently, a 0.1% change in the rate of shrink and obsolescence provision would equal approximately $0.5$0.6 million in additional charge or benefit to cost of sales, based on Fiscal 20072008 net sales since the last physical inventories.

The Company is generally entitled to return merchandise purchased from major vendors for credit against other purchases from these vendors. Certain vendors reduce the credit with a per unit merchandise return charge which varies depending on the type of merchandise being returned. Certain other vendors charge a handling fee based on units returned. The Company records merchandise return charges in cost of sales. The Company incurred merchandise return charges in its Fiscal yearsyear 2008, Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006 and 2005 of $4.1 million, $2.2 million and $3.6 million, and $5.6 million, respectively. Return penalties have declined in recent years, consistent with the decline in the Company’s music business which generates the majority of merchandise return penalties.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets:The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets to determine if any part of the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that the Company considers to be important when assessing impairment include:

• significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results;

• significant changes in the manner of the use of acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business;

• significant negative industry or economic trends;

	•	significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results;
	•	significant changes in the manner of the use of acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business;
	•	significant negative industry or economic trends;

If the Company determines that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable, it tests for impairment to determine if an impairment charge is needed. During Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $15.2 million and $30.7 million, respectively, related to the write down of certain long-lived assets at underperforming locations. There werewas no asset impairment chargescharge recorded in Fiscal 2006 or 2005.2006. Losses for store closings in the ordinary course of business represent the write down of the net book value of abandoned fixtures and leasehold improvements. The loss on disposal of fixed assets related to store closings was $1.2 million, $2.5 million $2.2 million and $2.4$2.2 million in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively, and is included in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and loss on disposal of fixed assets in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Store closings usually occur at the expiration of the lease, at which time leasehold improvements, which constitute a majority of the abandoned assets, are fully depreciated.

Income Taxes: Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Historically, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

Accounting for income taxes requires management to make estimates and judgments regarding interpretation of various taxing jurisdictions, laws and regulations as well as the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets. These estimates and judgments include the generation of future taxable income, viable tax planning strategies and support of tax filings. In assessing the propriety of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As of February 2, 2008, the Company has incurred a cumulative three-year loss. Based on the cumulative three-year loss and other available objective evidence, management concluded that a full valuation allowance should be recorded against its net deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. InDuring Fiscal 2008 and in future years, the Company will continue to record a valuation allowance against recorded net deferred tax assets to a level deemed appropriate by management to ensure that any net deferred tax assets not allowed against will ultimately be realized.

Effective February 4, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”),Accounting “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109109”, which prescribes a financial statement recognition threshold and measurement attribute for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The accounting for tax positions in accordance with FIN 48 requires management to make estimates relative to the likelihood of realization upon ultimate settlement of uncertain tax positions. For additional discussion regarding income taxes, refer to Note 6 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Stock-based Compensation:The Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, or SFAS 123(R), during Fiscal 2006 required that it recognize stock-based compensation expense associated with the vesting of share based instruments in the statement of operations. Determining the amount of stock-based compensation to be recorded requires the Company to develop estimates to be used in calculating the grant-date fair value of stock options. The Company calculates the grant-date fair values using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Black-Scholes model requires us to make estimates of the following assumptions:

Expected volatility—The estimated stock price volatility was derived based upon the Company’s actual historic stock prices over the expected life of the options, which represents the Company’s best estimate of expected volatility.

Expected option life—The Company’s estimate of an expected option life was calculated based on actual historical data relating to grants, exercises and cancellations.

Risk-free interest rate—The Company used the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected life assumption as the risk-free interest rate.

The amount of stock-based compensation recognized during a period is based on the value of the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The term “forfeitures” is distinct from “cancellations” or “expirations” and represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered option. The Company reviewed historical forfeiture data and determined the appropriate forfeiture rate based on that data. The Company will re-evaluate this analysis periodically and adjust the forfeiture rate as necessary. Ultimately, the Company will recognize the actual expense over the vesting period only for the shares that vest.

Accounting for Gift Card Liability:The Company sells gift cards that are redeemable only for merchandise and have no expiration date. The Company derecognizes card liability when either customers redeem cards, at which point the Company records revenue, or when the Company determines it does not have a legal obligation to remit unredeemed cards to the relevant jurisdictions and the likelihood of the cards being redeemed becomes remote, at which point the Company records breakage as a credit to SG&A expenses. The Company’s accounting for gift cards is based on estimating the Company’s liability for future card redemptions at the end of a reporting period. Estimated liability is equal to two years of unredeemed cards, plus an amount for outstanding cards that may possibly be redeemed for the cumulative look-back period, exclusive of the last two years. The Company’s ability to reasonably and reliably estimate the liability is based on historical redemption experience with gift cards and similar types of arrangements and the existence of a large volume of relatively homogeneous transactions. The Company’s estimate is not susceptible to significant external factors and the circumstances around gift card sales and redemptions have not changed significantly over time.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.

In December 2007,2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued StatementFASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP FAS No. 132(R)-1”) which amends SFAS No. 132(revised 2003) “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits” – an Amendment of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)FASB Statements No. 141 (Revised 2007),Business Combinations,87, 88, and 106 (“SFAS No. 141(R)132(R)”). This standard will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFASFSP FAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all132(R)-1 requires more detailed disclosures about the assets acquiredof a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinationsis effective for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on orfiscal years ending after December 15, 2008.2009. We are in the process of evaluating FSP FAS No. 132(R)-1 and do not expect it will have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“FSP-EITF No. 03-6-1”). Under FSP-EITF No. 03-6-1, unvested share-based

payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are considered participating securities and should be included in the two-class method of computing earnings per share. FSP-EITF No. 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The adoption of FSP-EITF No. 03-6-1 will not have any impact on the determination or reporting of our earnings per share.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS No. 142-3”). FSP FAS No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. The objective of FSP FAS No. 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations and other U.S. GAAP. FSP FAS No. 142-3 applies to all intangible assets, whether acquired in a business combination or otherwise and shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of FSP FAS No. 142-3 to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 seeks to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures regarding their impact on financial position, financial performance and cash flows. To achieve this increased transparency, SFAS No. 161 requires (1) disclosure of the fair value of derivative instruments and gains and losses in a tabular format; (2) disclosure of derivative features that are credit risk-related; and (3) cross-referencing within the footnotes. SFAS No. 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. We do not expect adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Noncontrolling “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - An“– an Amendment of ARB No. 51, (“SFAS No. 160”), which establishes new. SFAS No. 160 was issued to improve the relevance, comparability and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requiresThe provisions of SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively as of the recognitionbeginning of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equitythe fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for the consolidated financial statementspresentation and separate from the parent’s equity.disclosure requirements, which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. This standard doesWe do not currentlyexpect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a significant affectan impact on the Company.our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2006,December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements141(revised 2007), “Business Combinations “ (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a framework for measuring fair valuebusiness combination should recognize and measure in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP),its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, recognize and measure the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase and determine what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require141(R) shall be applied prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates on or permit fair value measurements, however, does not require any new fair value measurements.after the beginning of the first annual reporting period in which it is initially applied. SFAS No. 157141(R) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. However, the FASB issued FASB Staff Positions (“FSP”) 157-1 and 157-2. FSP 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to exclude FASB No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and its related interpretative accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions, while FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until fiscal years, beginning on or after NovemberDecember 15, 2008. TheWe do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 is not expected141(R) to have a significantan impact on the Company’sour Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company does not hold any financial instruments that expose it to significant market risk and does not engage in hedging activities. To the extent the Company borrows under its revolving credit facility, the Company is subject to risk resulting from interest rate fluctuations since interest on the Company’s borrowings under its revolving credit facility can be variable. If interest rates on the Company’s revolving credit facility were to increase by 25 basis points, and to the extent borrowings were outstanding, for every $1,000,000 outstanding on the facility, income before income taxes would be reduced by $2,500 per year. Information about the fair value of financial instruments is included in Note 1of1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The index to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements is included in Item 15, and the Consolidated Financial Statements follow the signature page to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

The quarterly results of operations are included herein in Note 11 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit, under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d – 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) inInternal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control- Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an audit report on the Company’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.

Changes in Controls and Procedures:No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarterly period ended February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

No events have occurred which would require disclosure under this Item.

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

(a) Identification of Directors

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Compensation of Directors” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 20082009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

(b) Identification of Executive Officers

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption “Executive Compensation” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 20082009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

(c) Code of Ethics

We have adopted the Trans World Entertainment Corporation Code of Ethics that applies to all officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company. The Code of Ethics is intended to comply with Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with applicable rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Our Code of Ethics is posted on our Internet website under the “Corporate” page. Our Internet website address is www.twec.com. To the extent required or permitted by the rules of the SEC and NASDAQ, we will disclose amendments and waivers relating to our Code of Ethics in the same place as our website.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption “Executive Compensation” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 20082009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the captions “Equity Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Principal Shareholders” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 20082009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

Information on Trans World Entertainment Common Stock authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is contained in our Proxy Statement for our 20082009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Stock Option Plans” and is incorporated herein by reference. See Note 8 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the Company’s employee stock award plans.

The following table contains information about the Company’s Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of the Company’s equity compensation plans as of February 2, 2008:January 31, 2009:

		Number of Shares to be Issued		Weighted Average Exercise		Number of Shares Remaining
		upon Exercise of Outstanding		Price of Outstanding Options,		Available for Future Issuance
Plan Category		Options, Warrants and Rights		Warrants and Rights		Under Equity Compensation
						Plans (Excluding Outstanding
						Options, Warrants and Rights)
				(Shares in thousands)
Equity Compensation Plan
Approved by Shareholders		9,020		$8.26		3,925
Equity Compensation Plans and
Agreements not Approved
by Shareholders		---		---		---

Plan Category		Number of Shares to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1)			Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights					Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights)
					(Shares in thousands)
Equity Compensation Plan Approved by Shareholders		8,183				$	7.86			3,857
Equity Compensation Plans and Agreements not Approved by Shareholders		—					—			—

(1) Excludes 275,228 restricted stock units reserved from the Company’s equity plans that will be settled in cash.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption “Related Party Transactions” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 20082009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption “Other Matters” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 20082009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS,ANDFINANCIAL AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

15(a) (1) Financial Statements

The Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this report.

15(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules

Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules not filed herein have been omitted as they are not applicable or the required information or equivalent information has been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

15(a) (3) Exhibits

Exhibits are as set forth in the “Index to Exhibits” which follows the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and immediately precedes the exhibits filed.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

			TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
Date: April 17, 200816, 2009					By: /s/ ROBERT J. HIGGINS
				Robert J. Higgins
					Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name		Title		Date
Name		Title		Date
/s/ ROBERT J. HIGGINS		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)		April 17, 200816, 2009
(Robert J. Higgins)			(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ JOHN J. SULLIVAN		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial		April 17, 2008
(John J. Sullivan)			and Chief Accounting Officer) and Secretary		April 16, 2009
/s/ BRETT BREWER (John J. Sullivan)		Director		April 17, 2008
(Brett Brewer)
/s/ MARK A. COHEN		Director		April 17, 2008
(Mark A. Cohen)
/s/ MARTIN E. HANAKA		Director		April 17, 2008
(Martin E. Hanaka)
/s/ ISAAC KAUFMAN		Director		April 17, 200816, 2009
(Isaac Kaufman)
/s/ DR. JOSEPH G. MORONE		Director		April 17, 200816, 2009
(Dr. Joseph G. Morone)
/s/ LORI SCHAFERBRYANT RILEY		Director		April 17, 200816, 2009
(Lori Schafer)
(Bryant Riley)
/s/ MICHAEL B. SOLOW		Director		April 17, 200816, 2009
(Michael B. Solow)
/s/ EDMOND THOMAS		Director		April 17, 2008
(Edmond Thomas)

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		Form 10-K
		Form 10-K Page No.
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Fiscal years ended
January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Fiscal years ended
January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006		F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Fiscal years ended
January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006		F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-8

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Trans World Entertainment Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective February 4, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board IntepretationInterpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” Effective February 3, 2007, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” In addition, effective January 29, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.”

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated April 17, 200816, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Albany, New York
April 17, 200816, 2009

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Trans World Entertainment Corporation:

We have audited Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”), internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide a reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

We also have audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, and our report dated April 17, 200816, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Albany, New York
April 17, 200816, 2009

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
($ in thousands)

			February 2,				February 3,			January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
			2008				2007
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$	74,655			$	118,630			$	30,055		$	74,655
Accounts receivable			8,632				7,874				7,559			8,632
Merchandise inventory			440,241				504,860				378,188			440,241
Income taxes receivable, net			5,216				---				—			5,216
Prepaid expenses and other			17,578				5,953				13,817			17,578
Deferred taxes, net			---				9,039
Total current assets			546,322				646,356				429,619			546,322
FIXED ASSETS, net			82,248				138,252				50,437			82,248
OTHER ASSETS											6,980			10,423
DEFERRED TAXES, net			---				32,715
OTHER ASSETS			10,423				12,367
TOTAL ASSETS		$	638,993			$	829,690			$	487,036		$	638,993
LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable		$	237,774			$	306,378			$	170,302		$	237,774
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			53,540				56,735				42,180			53,540
Income taxes payable, net			---				13,646
Current portion of long-term debt			537				506				570			537
Current portion of capital lease obligations			2,964				2,887				3,178			2,964
Total current liabilities			294,815				380,152				216,230			294,815
LONG –TERM DEBT, less current portion			3,552				4,085				2,986			3,552
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, less current portion			9,036				12,000				5,858			9,036
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES			33,441				40,248				26,947			33,441
TOTAL LIABILITIES			340,844				436,485				252,021			340,844
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued)			---				---
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized;
56,288,637 shares and 55,998,109 shares issued , respectively)			563				560
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued)											—			—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 56,372,101 shares and 56,288,637 shares issued, respectively)											564			563
Additional paid-in capital			303,998				301,526				306,159			303,998
Treasury stock at cost (25,102,990 and 25,103,990 shares , respectively)			(217,555	)			(217,560	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(1,625	)			(1,888	)
Treasury stock at cost (25,102,990 and 25,102,990 shares, respectively)											(217,555	)		(217,555	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)											2,396			(1,625	)
Retained earnings			212,768				310,567				143,451			212,768
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY			298,149				393,205				235,015			298,149
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	638,993			$	829,690			$	487,036		$	638,993

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

															Fiscal Year Ended
		Fiscal Year Ended
			February 2,				February 3,					January 28,			January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008			February 3, 2007
			2008				2007					2006
Net sales		$	1,265,658			$	1,471,157				$	1,238,486				$987,625			$1,265,658			$1,471,157
Cost of sales			819,911					951,935				806,873				656,730			819,911			951,935
Gross profit			445,747					519,222				431,613				330,895			445,747			519,222
Selling, general and administrative expenses			470,386					519,246				426,854				380,802			470,386			519,246
Asset impairment charge			30,731					---				---
(Loss) income from operations			(55,370	)				(24	)			4,759
Asset impairment charges																15,158			30,731			—
Loss from operations																(65,065	)		(55,370	)		(24	)
Interest expense			6,519					5,504				2,954				4,098			6,519			5,504
Other income			(429	)				(4,435	)			(2,171	)			(180	)		(429	)		(4,435	)
(Loss) income before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative
goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			(61,460	)				(1,093	)			3,976
Income tax expense (benefit)			37,975					(2,041	)			1,090
Loss before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill																(68,983	)		(61,460	)		(1,093	)
Income tax (benefit) expense																(28	)		37,975			(2,041	)
(Loss) income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill																(68,955	)		(99,435	)		948
and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			(99,435	)				948				2,886
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income
taxes of $0, $6,739 and $0 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively			---					10,721				---
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes
of $0, $0 and $1,505 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.			---					---				(2,277	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes of $6,739 in 2006																—			—			10,721
NET (LOSS) INCOME		$	(99,435	)		$		11,669			$	609				($68,955	)		($99,435	)		$11,669
BASIC (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE:
(Loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated
negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		$	(3.20	)		$		0.03			$	0.09
(Loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill																($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.03
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill			---					0.35				---				—			—			0.35
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			---					---				(0.07	)
Basic (loss) earnings per share		$	(3.20	)		$		0.38			$	0.02				($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.38
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic			31,046					30,797				31,962				31,223			31,046			30,797
DILUTED (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE:
(Loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated
negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		$	(3.20	)		$		0.03			$	0.09
(Loss) earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill																($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.03
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill			---					0.33				---				—			—			0.33
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			---					---				(0.07	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share		$	(3.20	)		$		0.36			$	0.02				($2.21	)		($3.20	)		$0.36
Weighted average number of common shares – diluted			31,046					31,986				32,132				31,223			31,046			31,986

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOMEINCOME(LOSS)
(Shares and $ in thousands)

										Unearned									Accum.
							Additional			Compensation						Treasury			Other
		Common		Common			Paid-in			Restricted			Treasury			Stock			Comp.			Retained		Shareholders’
		Shares		Stock			Capital			Stock			Shares			At Cost			Loss			Earnings		Equity
Balance as of January 29, 2005		55,015		$	550		$	292,922		$	(46)		(21,989)		$	(186,298)		$	(1,094)		$	298,289		$	404,323
Comprehensive loss:
Net income		---			---			---			---		---			---			---			609			609
Excess of additional minimum pension liability
over unrecognized prior service cost, net of
income taxes of $741		---			---			---			---		---			---			(954)			---			(954)
Total comprehensive loss																									(345)
Repurchase of shares of treasury stock		---			---			---			---		(3,117)			(31,270)			---			---			(31,270)
Issuance of treasury stock under
incentive stock programs		---			---			3			---		1			4			---			---			7
Amortization of unearned compensation
– restricted stock		---			---			---			16		---			---			---			---			16
Stock compensation and related tax benefit		713			7			5,774			---		---			---			---			---			5,781
Balance as of January 28, 2006		55,728		$	557		$	298,699		$	(30)		(25,105)		$	(217,564)		$	(2,048)		$	298,898		$	378,512
Comprehensive income:
Net income		---			---			---			---		---			---			---			11,669			11,669
Additional pension liability adjustment,
net of income taxes of $1,771		---			---			---			---		---			---			2,445			---			2,445
Total comprehensive income																									14,114
Adjustment to initially apply
SFAS 158, net of income taxes of $1,623		---			---			---			---		---			---			(2,285)			---			(2,285)
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock
programs		---			---			2			---		1			4			---			---			6
Stock compensation and related tax benefit		270			3			2,842			---		---			---			---			---			2,845
Reclassification of unearned compensation upon
adoption of SFAS 123(R)		---			---			(30)			30		---			---			---			---			---
Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted
stock		---			---			13			---		---			---			---			---			13
Balance as of February 3, 2007		55,998		$	560		$	301,526		$	---		(25,104)		$	(217,560)		$	(1,888)		$	310,567		$	393,205
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		---			---			---			---		---			---			---			(99,435)			(99,435)
Additional pension liability adjustment,
net of income taxes of $107		---			---			---			---		---			---			263			---			263
Total comprehensive loss																									(99,172)
Adjustment to initially apply FIN 48		---			---			---			---		---			---			---			1,636			1,636
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock
programs		---			---			1			---		1			5			---			---			6
Stock compensation and related tax benefit		291			3			2,532			---		---			---			---			---			2,535
Unearned compensation – restricted stock		---			---			(125)			---		---			---			---			---			(125)
Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted
stock		---			---			54			---		---			---			---			---			54
Reversal of unearned compensation – restricted stock
associated with termination of a participant		---			---			10			---		---			---			---			---			10
Balance as of February 2, 2008		56,289		$	563		$	303,998		$	---		(25,103)		$	(217,555)		$	(1,625)		$	212,768		$	298,149

		Common Shares		Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Unearned Compensation Restricted Stock			Treasury Shares		Treasury Stock At Cost			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Shareholders’ Equity
Balance as of January 28, 2006		55,728			$557			$298,699			($30	)	(25,105	)		($217,564	)		($2,048	)		$298,898			$378,512
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			11,669			11,669
Additional pension liability adjustment, net of income taxes of $1,771		—			—			—			—		—			—			2,445			—			2,445
Total comprehensive income																									14,114
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of income taxes of $1,623		—			—			—			—		—			—			(2,285	)		—			(2,285	)
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs		—			—			2			—		1			4			—			—			6
Stock compensation and related tax benefit		270			3			2,842			—		—			—			—			—			2,845
Reclassification of unearned compensation upon adoption of SFAS 123(R)		—			—			(30	)		30		—			—			—			—			—
Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted stock		—			—			13			—		—			—			—			—			13
Balance as of February 3, 2007		55,998			$560			$301,526			$    —		(25,104	)		($217,560	)		($1,888	)		$310,567			$393,205
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			(99,435	)		(99,435	)
Additional pension liability adjustment, net of income taxes of $107		—			—			—			—		—			—			263			—			263
Total comprehensive loss																									(99,172	)
Adjustment to initially apply FIN 48		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			1,636			1,636
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs		—			—			1			—		1			5			—			—			6
Stock compensation and related tax benefit		291			3			2,532			—		—			—			—			—			2,535
Unearned compensation – restricted stock		—			—			(125	)		—		—			—			—			—			(125	)
Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted stock		—			—			54			—		—			—			—			—			54
Reversal of unearned compensation – restricted stock associated with termination of a participant		—			—			10			—		—			—			—			—			10
Balance as of February 2, 2008		56,289			$563			$303,998			$   —		(25,103	)		($217,555	)		($1,625	)		$212,768			$298,149
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			(68,955	)		(68,955	)
Additional pension liability adjustment		—			—			—			—		—			—			4,021			—			4,021
Total comprehensive loss																									(64,934	)
Adjustment upon adoption of measurement date provision of FAS 158		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			(362	)		(362	)
Stock compensation		1			—			1,380			—		—			—			—			—			1,380
Issuance of stock to Directors		82			1			719			—		—			—			—			—			720
Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted stock		—			—			62			—		—			—			—			—			62
Balance as of January 31, 2009		56,372			$564			$306,159			$   —		(25,103	)		($217,555	)		$2,396			$143,451			$235,015

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($ in thousands)

								Fiscal Year Ended
		Fiscal Year Ended
		February 2,		February 3,		January 28,		January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008			February 3, 2007
		2008		2007		2006
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income		$(99,435)		$11,669		$609			($68,955	)		($99,435	)		$11,669
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used by) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets		39,900		40,099		37,216			23,614			39,900			40,099
Asset impairment charge		30,731		---		---
Asset impairment charges									15,158			30,731			—
Amortization of intangible assets		297		263		94			94			297			263
Amortization of lease valuations, net		(1,146)		(3,150)		(428)			(350	)		(1,146	)		(3,150	)
Stock compensation		1,906		2,191		319			1,930			1,906			2,191
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		2,535		2,243		2,391			1,219			2,535			2,243
Gain on sale of assets									(3,070	)		—			—
Gain on sale of available for sale securities and other investments		---		(3,528)		(813)			—			—			(3,528	)
Deferred tax expense (benefit)		42,475		(4,387)		4,186			—			42,475			(4,387	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income taxes		---		---		2,277
Decrease (increase) in cash surrender value									1,585			(130	)		641
Extraordinary gain on acquisition of businesses, net of income taxes		---		(10,721)		---			—			—			(10,721	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition:
Accounts receivable		(758)		819		(2,469)			1,073			(758	)		819
Merchandise inventory		64,619		10,520		28,534			62,053			64,619			10,520
Prepaid expenses and other		(11,625)		146		1,067			3,761			(11,625	)		146
Other assets		47		(490)		544			186			177			(1,131	)
Accounts payable		(68,444)		3,804		(38,776)			(66,753	)		(68,444	)		3,804
Income taxes receivable/payable		(17,280)		2,247		(7,863)			5,708			(17,280	)		2,247
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(3,457)		(3,305)		(2,831)			(8,321	)		(3,457	)		(3,305	)
Other long-term liabilities		(5,944)		(1,152)		1,190			(6,164	)		(5,944	)		(1,152	)
Net cash (used by) provided by operating activities		(25,579)		47,268		25,247			(37,232	)		(25,579	)		47,268
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of fixed assets		(15,949)		(48,289)		(41,330)			(10,066	)		(15,949	)		(48,289	)
Acquisition of businesses		---		(78,810)		---			—			—			(78,810	)
Net proceeds from sale of distribution facility									6,193			—			—
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities and other investments		---		4,228		813			—			—			4,228
Net cash used by investing activities		(15,949)		(122,871)		(40,517)			(3,873	)		(15,949	)		(122,871	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from capital lease obligations		---		---		12,877
Payments of long-term debt		(502)		(473)		(444)			(533	)		(502	)		(473	)
Payments of capital lease obligations		(2,887)		(3,182)		(2,117)			(2,964	)		(2,887	)		(3,182	)
Payments of debt issue costs		---		---		(495)
Payments for purchases of treasury stock		---		---		(31,270)
Excess tax benefit from stock award exercises		3		36		---			—			3			36
Proceeds from exercise of stock awards		939		643		4,160			2			939			643
Net cash used by financing activities		(2,447)		(2,976)		(17,289)			(3,495	)		(2,447	)		(2,976	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(43,975)		(78,579)		(32,559)			(44,600	)		(43,975	)		(78,579	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		118,630		197,209		229,768			74,655			118,630			197,209
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year		$74,655		$118,630		$197,209			$30,055			$74,655			$118,630
Supplemental disclosures and non-cash investing and financing activities:
Interest paid									$4,164			$5,529			$2,901
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs		$6		$6		$7			—			6			6
Issuance of deferred / restricted shares under deferred / restricted stock plans		160		105		---			—			160			105
Income tax benefit resulting from exercises of stock options		---		---		1,621
Interest paid		6,534		5,529		2,901
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations: Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries (“the Company”) is one of the largest specialty retailers of entertainment software, including music, video, video games and related products in the United States. The Company operates a chain of retail entertainment stores and e-commerce sites,www.fye.com, www.wherehouse.com, www.secondspin.com andwww.secondspin.com, www.samgoody.comwww.suncoast.comandwww.suncoast.com in a single industry segment. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the Company operated 813712 stores totaling approximately 5.14.6 million square feet in the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Company’s business is seasonal in nature, with the peak selling period being the holiday season in the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter.

Liquidity: The Company’s primary sources of working capital are cash provided by sales of merchandise inventory and borrowing capacity under its revolving credit facility. The Company’s cash flows fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to various items, including seasonality of sales and earnings, merchandise inventory purchases and returns and the related terms on the purchases and capital expenditures. Management believes it will have adequate resources to fund its cash needs for the foreseeable future, including its capital spending, its seasonal increase in merchandise inventory and other operating cash requirements and commitments. Management has considered many initiatives as part of the development of its operating plan for 2009 and beyond that focus on the operation of a core base of stores, improved product selection based on customer preferences and industry changes, as well as further streamlining of its operations. During Fiscal 2008, management carried out certain strategic initiatives in its efforts to reduce certain operating costs such as the closure of the Canton, OH distribution center, reduction of headcount at the home office and the Albany, NY distribution center, as well as the elimination or curtailment of certain other general and administrative expenses. Also, during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008, management closed 74 stores and plans to continue its careful evaluation of store profitability of its remaining 712 stores in consideration of lease terms, conditions and expirations. As a consequence of these further actions, the liquidation of the merchandise inventory from closed stores and management of overall merchandise inventory levels, management expects improvement in its operating cash flow during Fiscal 2009.

Management anticipates any cash requirements due to a shortfall in cash from operations will be funded by the Company’s revolving credit facility, as discussed further within note 5. Cash flows from investing and financing activities during Fiscal 2009 are expected to be comparable with Fiscal 2008.

Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements consist of Trans World Entertainment Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Record Town, Inc. (“Record Town”), and Record Town’s subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain amounts in previously issued consolidated financial statements were reclassified to conform to the Fiscal 2007 presentation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Items Affecting Comparability:The Company’s fiscal year is a 52 or 53-week period ending the Saturday nearest to January 31. Fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 and 2005 ended January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, and January 28, 2006, respectively. Fiscal 2006 had 53 weeks and 20072008 and 20052007 had 52 weeks. The 53^rd week of business in Fiscal 2006 contributed approximately $23.0 million in net sales.

Effective February 4, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”),Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which prescribes a financial statement recognition threshold and measurement attribute for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In particular, FIN 48 requires uncertain tax positions to be recognized only if they are more-likely-than-not to be upheld based on their technical merits. Additionally, the measurement of a tax position will be based on the largest amount that is determined to have greater than a 50% likelihood of realization upon ultimate settlement. Any resulting cumulative effect of adopting the provisions of FIN 48 are to be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. As a result of adopting FIN 48, the Company recorded a $1.6 million decrease in its reserve for uncertain tax positions as an adjustment to retained earnings. See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed discussion.

The Company adopted the FASB’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158, ,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), effective February 3, 2007. In accordance with SFAS No. 158, the Company recorded a liability equal to the underfunded status of the Company sponsored Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) and “Director Retirement Plan” as of the November 1, 20062007 measurement date. See Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed discussion.

Effective January 29, 2006,February 3, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under US GAAP and expands disclosure related to the use of fair value measures in financial statements. SFAS No. 157 does not expand the use of fair

value measures in financial statements, but standardizes its definition and guidance in GAAP. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy with observable market data as the highest level and fair value based on an entity’s own fair value assumptions as the lowest level. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to nonfinancial assets and liabilities is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective February 3, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized during 2006159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and 2007 includes compensation expense for all stock-based awards granted priorFinancial Liabilities, which permits entities to but not yet vested as of January 29, 2006 as well as awards granted in Fiscal 2006choose to measure certain financial assets and 2007, based on the grant-dateliabilities at fair value, estimatedwith changes in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123. Results for prior periods have not been restated, as allowed for under the modified prospective transition method.

fair value reported in operations. The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47Accountingdid not choose the fair value option for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretationany financial instruments upon the adoption of FASB Statement No. 143, effective January 28, 2006. In accordance with FIN 47, the Company recorded an asset and a corresponding liability for the present value of the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at its store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases.this statement.

Concentration of Business Risks:The Company purchases merchandise inventory for its stores from approximately 500527 suppliers, with approximately 61%60% of purchases being made from ten suppliers including EMI Music Distribution, Sony-Bertelsmann Music Group, Warner/Electra/Atlantic Corp., Universal Music Group, Fox Video Inc., Paramount Video, Buena Vista Video, Warner Home Entertainment, Universal Studios Home Entertainment and Sony Pictures Home Entertainment.Nintendo. Historically, the Company has not experienced difficulty in obtaining satisfactory sources of supply, and management believes that it will retain access to adequate sources of supply. However, a loss of a major supplier could cause a loss of sales, which would have an adverse effect on operating results.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Concentration of Credit Risks: The Company maintains centralized cash management and investment programs whereby excess cash balances are invested in short-term money market funds and instruments considered to be cash equivalents. The Company’s investment portfolio is diversified and consists of short-term investment grade securities consistent with its investment guidelines. These guidelines include the provision that sufficient liquidity will be maintained to meet anticipated cash flow needs. The Company maintains investments with various financial institutions. These amounts often exceed the FDIC insurance limits. The Company limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution and believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to cash investments.

Accounts Receivable:Accounts receivable are comprised of receivables and unbilled revenues from advertising services performed for third parties, and amounts due under operating or service agreements with unaffiliated entities, loans to related business ventures, and other, individually insignificant amounts. There are no provisions for uncollectible amounts from retail sales of merchandise inventory since payment is received at the time of sale.

Merchandise Inventory and Return Costs: Merchandise inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market under the average cost method. Inventory valuation requires significant judgment and estimates, including obsolescence, shrink and any adjustments to market value, if market value is lower than cost. The Company records obsolescence and any adjustments to market value (if lower than cost) based on current and anticipated demand, customer preferences and market conditions. The provision for inventory shrink is estimated as a percentage of sales for the period from the last date a physical inventory was performed to the end of the fiscal year. Such estimates are based on historical results and trends, and the shrink results from the last physical inventory. Physical inventories are taken at least annually for all stores and distribution centers throughout the year, and inventory records are adjusted accordingly.

The Company is generally entitled to return merchandise purchased from major music vendors for credit against other purchases from these vendors. Certain vendors reduce the credit with a merchandise return charge which varies depending on the type of merchandise being returned. Certain other vendors charge a handling fee based on units returned. The Company records merchandise return charges in cost of sales.

Fixed Assets and Depreciation: Fixed assets are recorded at cost and depreciated or amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives are as follows:

Leasehold improvements		Lesser of estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term
Fixtures and equipment		3-7 years
Buildings and improvements		10-30 years

Major improvements and betterments to existing facilities and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. A majority of the Company’s operating leases are ten years in term. Amortization of capital lease assets is included in depreciation and amortization expense.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset over its remaining useful life. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair value is generally measured based on discounted estimated future cash flows. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or

fair value less disposition costscosts.

During Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $15.2 million and $30.7 million, respectively, related to the write down of certain long-lived assets at underperforming locations. There were no asset impairment charges recorded in Fiscal 2006 or 2005. Losses for store closings in the ordinary course of business represent the write down of the net book value of abandoned fixtures and leasehold improvements. The loss on disposal of fixed assets related to store closings was $1.2 million, $2.5 million $2.2 million and $2.4$2.2 million in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and loss on disposal of fixed assets in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Store closings usually occur at the expiration of the lease, at which time leasehold improvements, which constitute a majority of the abandoned assets, are fully depreciated.

Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations:The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the asset. The Company also records a corresponding asset that is depreciated over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the ARO, the ARO is adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation.

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates:Investments in unconsolidated affiliates have been recorded on the cost basis, with any decline in the market value below cost that is deemed other than temporary charged to operations. Write-offs of investments in unconsolidated affiliates for

other than temporary decline in market value are reflected in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. There were no write-offs of investments in unconsolidated affiliates in Fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of its business and have not been finally adjudicated. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters, it is management’s opinion, based upon the information available at this time, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

Revenue Recognition:The Company’s revenue is primarily from retail sales of merchandise inventory. Revenue is recognized at the point-of-sale. Internet sales are recognized as revenue upon shipment. Shipping and handling fee income from the Company’s Internet operations is recognized as net sales. Loyalty card revenue is amortized straight-line over the life of the membership period. Net sales are recorded net of estimated amounts for sales returns and other allowances. The Company records shipping and handling costs in cost of goods sold. Net sales are recorded net of applicable sales taxes.

Cost of Sales: In addition to the cost of product, the Company includes in cost of sales those costs associated with purchasing, receiving, shipping, inspecting and warehousing product. Also included are costs associated with the return of product to vendors. Cost of sales further includes the cost of inventory shrink and obsolescence and the benefit of vendor allowances and discounts.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) ExpensesExpenses:: Included in SG&A expenses are payroll and related costs, store operating costs, occupancy charges, professional and service fees, general operating and overhead expenses and depreciation charges (excluding those related to distribution operations, as discussed in Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Selling, general and administrative expenses also include fixed asset write offs associated with store closures, if any, and miscellaneous items, other than interest.

Advertising Costs and Vendor Allowances:The Company often receives allowances from its vendors to fund in-store displays, print, radio and television advertising, and other promotional events. The Company accounts for vendor allowances in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB’s”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Statement No. 02-16,Accounting “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a VendorVendor”. Vendor advertising allowances which exceed specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred in relation to the advertising and promotions offered by the Company to its vendors are classified as a reduction in the purchase price of merchandise inventory. Accordingly, advertising and sales promotion costs are charged to operations, offset by direct vendor reimbursements, as incurred. Total advertising expense, excluding vendor allowances, was $29.7$23.2 million, $29.7 million, and $22.0$29.7 million in Fiscal 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005,2006, respectively. In the aggregate, vendor allowances supporting the Company’s advertising and promotion included as a reduction of SG&A expenses, as reimbursements of such costs in accordance with EITF No. 02-16, were $14.7 million, $15.9 million, $10.7 million, and $9.6$10.7 million in Fiscal 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005,2006, respectively.

Lease Accounting:The Company’s calculation of straight-line rent expense includes the impact of escalating rents for periods in which it is reasonably assured of exercising lease options and includes in the lease term any period during which the Company is not obligated to pay rent while the store is being constructed (“rent holiday”). The Company accounts for step rent provisions, escalation clauses and other lease concessions by recognizing these amounts on a straight line basis over the initial lease term. The Company capitalizes leasehold improvements funded by tenant improvement allowances, depreciating them over the lives of the related leases. The tenant improvement allowances are recorded as deferred rent within other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are amortized as a reduction in rent expense over the life of the related leases.

Store Closing CostsCosts:: Management periodically considers the closing of underperforming stores. Reserves are established at the time a liability is incurred for the present value of any remaining lease obligations, net of estimated sublease income, and other exit costs, as prescribed by SFAS No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.

Gift Cards: The Company offers gift cards for sale. A deferred income account, which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is established for gift cards issued. The deferred income balance related to gift cards was $18.3$13.1 million and $21.0$18.3 million at the end of Fiscal 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectivelyrespectively. When gift cards are redeemed at the store level, revenue is recorded and the related liability is reduced. Breakage is estimated based on the historical relationship of the redemption of gift cards redeemed to gift cards sold, over a certain period of time. The Company has the ability to reasonably and reliably estimate gift card liability based on historical experience with redemption rates associated with a large volume of homogeneous transactions, from a period of more than ten years. The Company’s estimate is not susceptible to significant external factors and the circumstances around purchases and redemptions have not changed significantly over time. The Company recorded breakage on its gift cards for Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 in the amount of $4.1 million, $3.4 million $3.6 million and $2.9$3.6 million, respectively. Gift card breakage is recorded as a reduction of SG&A expenses.

Income Taxes: Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to

apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operationsincome in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are subject to valuation allowances based upon management’s estimates of realizability.

Beginning with the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” as of February 4, 2007, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized the effect of income tax positions only if such positions were probable of being sustained. It is the Company’s practice to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense (benefit) in the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Operations.operations.

Stock-Based Compensation:Effective January 29, 2006, Stock-based compensation represents the cost related to stock-based awards granted to employees and directors. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123 (R)”), which amends SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB No. 25in establishing standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, as well as transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that aremeasures stock-based compensation cost at grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement requires thataward, and recognizes the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the option’s requisite service period. The Company recognizes compensation expense based on estimated grant date fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Tax benefits resulting from all share-based payment transactionstax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options are to be classified and reported as both an operating cash outflow and financing cash inflow.

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the financial statements based onConsolidated Statements of Operations for Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006 was $1.9 million, $1.9 million and $2.2 million. For Fiscal 2008 the related total deferred tax expense was $0.1 million. The related total deferred tax benefit was approximately $0.8 million and $0.9 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of January 31, 2009, there was $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock option awards that is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

The fair valuevalues of the share-based payment. This Statement establishes fair value asoptions granted have been estimated at the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees, except for equity instruments held by employee share ownership plans. As allowed under SFAS No. 123 (R),date of grant using the Company elected the modified prospective method of adoption, under which compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginningBlack - Scholes option pricing model with the effective date of SFAS No. 123 (R) for all share-based payments granted after that date, and for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123 (R). Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated.following assumptions:

		Stock Option Plan
		2008			2007			2006
Dividend yield			0%			0%			0%
Expected volatility			52.8% - 56.3%			65.1% - 68.7%			65.9% - 71.2%
Risk-free interest rate			1.42% - 3.41%			3.57% - 4.94%			4.64% - 5.04%
Expected option life in years			4.87 – 5.69			4.70 – 7.30			4.93 – 7.12
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted during the year			$1.34			$3.39			$3.42

In the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of previously granted unvested options awarded annually to employees and officers under the Company’s Stock Option Plans which had exercise prices greater than $10.00 per share. Options to purchase 2,273,057 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing approximately 24% of the total options outstanding, became immediately vested and exercisable as a result of this action. The number of shares and exercise prices of the options subject to the acceleration remained unchanged. Also, all of the other terms of the options remain the same. Based upon an analysis performed, in accordance with SFAS No.123, the acceleration of vesting of these stock options resulted in compensation expense of $5.9 million, in the pro forma net income (loss) results.million. The decision to accelerate vesting of these stock options was made primarily to avoid recognizing compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in future financial statements upon the adoption of SFAS No.123 (R),Share-Based Payment,which the Company adopted on January 29, 2006. The acceleration of the vesting of these stock options reduced the amounts recognized by the Company as share-based compensation expense, net of income taxes, by approximately $2.4 million in Fiscal 2006 and by approximately $1.9

$1.9 million in Fiscal 2007 and will reduce compensation expense by approximately $1.2 million in Fiscal 2008, and will reduce compensation expense by approximately $0.4 million in Fiscal 2009. The accelerated options included 1,355,000 options held by executive officers and 918,057 options held by other employees. Based on the Company’s closing stock price of $6.25 per share on the date of accelerated vesting, the exercise prices of all of the options were above the closing market price.

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006 was $1.9 million and $2.2 million. The related total deferred tax benefit was approximately $0.8 million and $0.9 million in Fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company presented all tax benefits for deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options to be classified and reported as both an operating cash outflow and a financing cash inflow on a prospective basis upon adoption. As of February 2, 2008, there was $3.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock option awards that is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of 2.4 years.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to its share-based payments for Fiscal 2005.

($ in thousands except for per share amounts)		2005
Net income, as reported			$   609
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense
included in reported net income, net of related tax
effects			180
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method for
all awards, net of related tax effects
			(7,521)
Pro forma net (loss) income		$	(6,732)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic - as reported		$	0.02
Basic– pro forma		$	(0.21)
Diluted – as reported		$	0.02
Diluted – pro forma		$	(0.21)

The fair values of the options granted have been estimated at the date of grant using the Black - Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

		Stock Option Plan
		2007		2006		2005
Dividend yield		0%		0%		0%
Expected volatility		65.1% - 68.7%		65.9% - 71.2%		55%
Risk-free interest rate		3.57% - 4.94%		4.64% - 5.04%		3.71% - 4.34%
Expected option life in years		4.70 – 7.30		4.93 – 7.12		5 – 6.25
Weighted average fair value per share
of options granted during the year		$3.39		$3.42		$6.59

(Loss) Earnings Per Share: Basic (loss) earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted (loss) earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted average shares outstanding and additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued for the Company’s common stock awards from the Company’s Stock Award Plans.

The following is a reconciliation of the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding to the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding:

								Fiscal Year
		Fiscal Year						2008			2007			2006
		2007		2006		2005
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic		31,046		30,797		31,962			31,223			31,046			30,797
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock awards		---		1,189		170			—			—			1,189
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		31,046		31,986		32,132			31,223			31,046			31,986
Antidilutive stock awards		6,413		7,290		4,756			6,651			6,413			7,290

As the Company recorded a net loss during Fiscal 2008 and 2007, the impact of all outstanding stock awards was not considered as such impact would be antidilutive. Certain stock awards outstanding were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for Fiscal 2006 and 2005 because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying value of life insurance policies included in other assets approximates fair value based on estimates received from insurance companies. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt including current portion, approximates fair value based on estimated discounted future cash flows for remaining maturities and rates currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments. The Company had no outstanding product import letters of credit with a fair value of $0 and $36 thousand as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 respectively.2008.

Segment Information:The Company has one reportable segment in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The following table shows net sales by merchandise category:

								Fiscal year
		Fiscal year						2008			2007			2006
		2007		2006		2005
		($ in thousands)						($ in thousands)
Music		$494,286		$676,091		$663,712		$	349,737		$	494,286		$	676,091
Video		491,360		529,900		371,965			407,884			491,360			529,900
Video games		114,431		114,654		90,408			90,233			114,431			114,654
Other		165,581		150,512		112,401			139,771			165,581			150,512
Total		$1,265,658		$1,471,157		$1,238,486		$	987,625		$	1,265,658		$	1,471,157

The “Other” category includes electronics, accessories and trend items, none of which individually exceeds 10% of total net sales.

Note 2. Business Combinations

On March 27, 2006, the Company acquired substantially all the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. (“Musicland”). Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”), the Company acquired 335 of Musicland’s 400 stores, with the remainder of the stores being liquidated under an agency agreement with Hilco Merchant Resources LLC. Musicland, which operated retail stores and websites, filed a voluntary petition to restructure under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in January 2006. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2006 includes the results of Musicland beginning March 27, 2006.

The purchase price for the acquired Musicland assets was $78.8 million, including acquisition-related costs of $1.8 million. The total purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of February 3, 2007 as follows:

			($ in thousands)
Assets Acquired:
Inventory		$	112,612
Liabilities Assumed:
Accrued expenses and other		$	11,062
Other long-term liabilities			5,280
Total liabilities assumed		$	16,342
Net assets acquired		$	96,270

From March 27, 2006 to February 3, 2007, the Company allocated the purchase price in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations, “Business Combinations”, resulting in an extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill of $10.7 million, net of income taxes of $6.7 million. The extraordinary gain represents the excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price. The purchase price was

allocated on a preliminary basis during the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2006 using information available at the time. The extraordinary gain recorded as of April 29, 2006 was $0.9 million, which was net of income taxes of $0.7 million. In accordance with SFAS No.141, the allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities acquired must be finalized within twelve months following the date of acquisition. Accordingly, the purchase price allocation was adjusted between April 29,26, 2006 and February 3, 2007, resulting in an adjustment to the extraordinary gain of $9.8 million, which is net of income taxes of $6.0 million. The pre-tax increase in the extraordinary gain from April 29, 2006 to February 2, 2008 represented adjustments to the value of acquired inventory ($1.9 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to the former Musicland loyalty program ($3.4 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to gift cards based on the redemption experience since acquisition ($6.1 million), an adjustment to occupancy related expenses ($1.5 million) and an adjustment to the cash purchase price ($2.9 million).

Note 3. Fixed Assets

Note 3. Fixed Assets
Fixed assets consist of the following:
		February 2,				February 3,
		2008				2007
		($ in thousands)
Buildings and improvements	$	26,513			$	26,493
Fixtures and equipment		173,414				229,115
Leasehold improvements		76,274				157,935
		276,201				413,543
Allowances for depreciation and amortization		(193,953	)			(275,291	)
	$	82,248			$	138,252

Fixed assets consist of the following:

		January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
		($ in thousands)
Buildings and improvements		$	17,288		$	26,513
Fixtures and equipment			136,896			173,414
Leasehold improvements			48,240			76,274
			202,424			276,201
Allowances for depreciation and amortization			(151,987	)		(193,953	)
		$	50,437		$	82,248

Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets is included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:

											Fiscal Year
			Fiscal Year								2008			2007			2006
			2007			2006			2005
			($ in thousands)								($ in thousands)
Cost of sales		$	2,670		$	3,108		$	3,076		$	1,563		$	2,670		$	3,108
Selling, general and administrative expenses			37,230			36,991			34,140			22,051			37,230			36,991
Total		$	39,900		$	40,099		$	37,216		$	23,614		$	39,900		$	40,099

Depreciation and amortization expense related to the Company’s distribution center facility and equipment is included in cost of sales. All other depreciation and amortization of fixed assets is included in SG&A expenses.

Note 4. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

During Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, the Company concluded, based on a significant decline in sales and earnings during the fourth quarter, that triggering events had occurred, pursuant to SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”)., requiring a test of long-lived assets for impairment at its retail stores and consolidated subsidiaries. Long-lived assets at locations where impairment was determined to exist were written down to their estimated fair values as of February 2, 2008,the end of the period, resulting in the recording of an asset impairment chargecharges of $15.2 million and $30.7 million.million in Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, respectively. Estimated fair values for long-lived assets at these locations, including store fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements and certain intangible assets, were determined based on a measure of discounted future cash flows over the remaining lease terms at the respective locations. Future cash flows were estimated based on store operating plans and were discounted at a rate approximating the Company’s cost of capital. Management believes its assumptions were reasonable and consistently applied.

Note 5. Debt

On January 5, 2006, the Company entered into a five year, $100 million revolving secured credit facility agreement (“Credit Agreement”Facility”) with Bank of America, N.A. At the election of the Company, loans under the Credit AgreementFacility bear interest on the principal amount at a rate equal to either the Prime Rate or Adjusted LIBOR plus 0.75%. The principal amount of all outstanding loans under the Credit AgreementFacility together with any accrued but unpaid interest, are due and payable on January 6, 2011, unless otherwise paid earlier pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement.Facility. Payments of amounts due under the Credit AgreementFacility are secured by the assets of the Company.

The Credit AgreementFacility includes customary provisions, including affirmative and negative covenants, which include representations, warranties and restrictions on additional indebtedness and acquisitions. The Credit AgreementFacility also includes customary events of default, including, among other things, a material adverse effect, bankruptcy, and certain changes of control. The Company was in compliance with terms and conditions of the Credit AgreementFacility as of February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.

On March 23, 2006, the Company entered into a First Amendment of the Credit AgreementFacility with Bank of America, N.A. which increased the maximum amount available for borrowing under the revolving secured credit facility to $130 million, under the same terms and conditions.

On October 20, 2006, the Company entered into a Second Amendment of the Credit AgreementFacility with Bank of America, N.A. which increased the maximum amount available for borrowing under the revolving secured credit facility to $150 million, under the same terms and conditions. The availability under the Credit Facility is subject to limitations based on sufficient inventory levels.

During Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, the highest aggregate balances outstanding under the revolving credit facility were $97.6 million, $111.5 million $107.5 million and $27.2$107.5 million, respectively. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, the Company had $0 and $36 thousand, respectively, inno outstanding letter of credit obligations under the Credit AgreementsFacility with Bank of America, N.A. The Company had $150 million available for borrowing as of February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 and February 3, 2007.2008.

During Fiscal 2004, the Company borrowed $5.8 million under a mortgage loan to finance the purchase of real estate. The mortgage loan is repayable in monthly installments of $64,000 over 10 years with a fixed interest rate of 6.0% and is collateralized by the real estate. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the outstanding balance on the loan was $4.1$3.6 million. The following table presents principal cash payments of long-term debt by expected maturity dates as of February 2, 2008:January 31, 2009:

			Long-term debt
			($ in thousands)
2008		$	537
2009			570
2010			606
2011			643
2012			683
Thereafter			1,050
Total			4,089
Less: current portion			537
Long –term debt obligation		$	3,552

		Long-term debt
		($ in thousands)
2009			$570
2010			605
2011			643
2012			683
2013			725
Thereafter			330
Total			3,556
Less: current portion			570
Long –term debt obligation			$2,986

Note 6. Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:

														Fiscal Year
			Fiscal Year											2008			2007			2006
			2007				2006				2005
			($ in thousands)											($ in thousands)
Federal – current		$	(4,864	)		$	2,090			$	(3,887	)			($455	)		($4,864	)		$2,090
State – current			364				256				791				427			364			256
Deferred			42,475				(4,387	)			4,186				—			42,475			(4,387	)
		$	37,975			$	(2,041	)		$	1,090
															($28	)		$37,975			($2,041	)

A reconciliation of the Company’s effective income tax rate with the Federal statutory rate is as follows:

		Fiscal Year
		2007			2006			2005
Federal statutory rate		35.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
State income taxes, net of
federal tax effect		(15.9	)%		17.9	%		52.2	%
Change in federal valuation allowance		(78.1	)%		99.3	%		(5.9	)%
Corporate-owned life insurance
payment settlement, net		(0.4	)%		(21.4	)%		5.9	%
Cash surrender value – insurance/ benefit
programs		(0.1	)%		10.7	%		(4.2	)%
Executive compensation		(0.2	)%		(13.1	)%		3.3	%
Tax exempt income		---			17.7	%		(3.2	)%
Closing of tax periods		---			18.1	%		(8.8	)%
Tax credits		(0.1	)%		27.6	%		(7.8	)%
Recognized deferred tax asset		---			---			(43.3	)%
Other		(2.0	)%		(5.1	)%		4.2	%
Effective income tax rate		(61.8	)%		186.7	%		27.4	%

During Fiscal 2005, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $2.0 million attributable to the effect of additional deductible temporary differences. The Other category is comprised of various items, including the impacts of non deductible meals, dues, penalties, amortization, uncertain tax positions, tax attribute carryback limitations and graduated rate brackets.

		Fiscal Year
		2008			2007			2006
Federal statutory rate			35.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal tax effect			(0.2	%)		(15.9	%)		17.9	%
Change in valuation allowance			(32.1	%)		(78.1	%)		99.3	%
Corporate-owned life insurance payment settlement, net			—			(0.4	%)		(21.4	%)
Cash surrender value – insurance/ benefit programs			(1.0	%)		(0.1	%)		10.7	%
Executive compensation			(0.2	%)		(0.2	%)		(13.1	%)
Tax exempt income			—			—			17.7	%
Closing of tax periods			—			—			18.1	%
Tax credits			(0.1	%)		(0.1	%)		27.6	%
Other			(1.4	%)		(2.0	%)		(5.1	%)
Effective income tax rate			0.0	%		(61.8	%)		186.7	%

Under the final payment terms of a 2003 agreement between the Company and the IRS regarding an earlier audit, the Company made a final principal payment of $7.1 million in 2007.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows:
	February 2,				February 3,
	2008				2007
	($ in thousands)
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
Accrued expenses	$	1,643			$	1,888
Inventory		4,690				5,459
Retirement and compensation related accruals		8,033				7,172
Fixed assets, including impairment charge	18,949					3,532
Federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards	19,011					10,381
Real estate leases, including deferred rent		9,799				11,839
Losses on investments		1,683				2,475
Goodwill		5,525				6,251
Other		1,263				493
Gross deferred tax assets before valuation allowance	70,596					49,490
Less: valuation allowance	(70,596		)			(7,736	)
Total deferred tax assets	$	---			$	41,754
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES		---				---
NET DEFERRED TAX ASSET	$	---			$	41,754
The net deferred tax asset is classified on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
	February 2,				February 3,
	2008				2007
	($ in thousands)
Current deferred tax asset, net	$	---			$	9,039
Non-current deferred tax asset, net		---				32,715
	$	---			$	41,754

The netother category is comprised of various items, including the impacts of non deductible meals, dues, penalties, amortization, uncertain tax positions, tax attribute, carryback limitations and graduate tax brackets.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assetassets are as of February 3, 2007 reflects the tax effect ($1.2 million) of the reduction of deductible temporary differences related to the extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill associated with the Musicland acquisition and the tax effect ($0.2 million) of the combined reductions in deductible temporary differences related to the exercise and cancellation of stock options accounted for under SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, charged to Additional Paid-In Capital and to changes in the Company’s pension liability accounted for under SFAS No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, charged to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.follows:

		January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
		($ in thousands)
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
Accrued expenses		$	1,581		$	1,643
Inventory			2,582			4,690
Retirement and compensation related accruals			7,009			8,033
Fixed assets			19,402			18,949
Federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards			46,895			19,011
Real estate leases, including deferred rent			7,671			9,799
Losses on investments			2,013			1,683
Goodwill			4,579			5,525
Other			1,009			1,263
Gross deferred tax assets before valuation allowance			92,741			70,596
Less: valuation allowance			(92,741	)		(70,596	)
Total deferred tax assets		$	—		$	—
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES			—			—
NET DEFERRED TAX ASSET		$	—		$	—

The Company has a net operating loss carryforward of $19.7$88.7 million for federal income tax purposes and approximately $155$210 million for state income tax purposes as of the end of Fiscal 20072008 that expire at various times through 2025 and are subject to certain limitations and statutory expiration periods. The state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to various business apportionment factors and multiple jurisdictional requirements when utilized. The Company has federal tax credit carryforwards of $0.9 million, of which $0.2 million will expire in 2026, with the remainder available indefinitely. The Company has state tax credit carryforwards of $1.1 million, of which $0.3 million will expire in 2027.

In assessing the proprietyrealizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in

making this assessment. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the Company has incurred a cumulative three-year loss. Based on the cumulative three-year loss and other available objective evidence, management concluded that a full valuation allowance should be recorded against its deferred tax assets. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the valuation allowance increased to $70.6$92.7 million from $7.7$70.6 million at February 3, 2007,2008; because management believes that it is more likely than not that the tax benefit will not be realized. The increase in the valuation allowance includes approximately $11.6 million associated with the impairment of long-lived assets, pursuant to SFAS No. 144, and approximately $14.3 million associated withequals the increase in valuation allowance against federalgross deferred tax assets and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards during Fiscal 2007. The remaining change is consistent with the Company’s decision to record a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets that have been recorded in the normal course of business, as described above.

During Fiscal 2008, the Company paid income taxes of approximately $0.2 million and received income tax refunds of approximately $6.0 million. For Fiscal 2007, the Company paid income taxes, net of refunds, of approximately $12.4 million. For Fiscal 2006, the Company received a net income tax refund of approximately $0.1 million. For Fiscal 2005, the Company paid income taxes, net of refunds, of approximately $4.7 million.

On February 4, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”),Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Under FIN 48, the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained, based on its technical merits, on examination by taxing authorities. The amount of the tax benefit recognized is measured as the largest amount that is determined to have a greater than 50% likelihood of realization upon ultimate settlement. Upon adoption of FIN 48 on February 4, 2007, the Company reduced the total reserve for uncertain tax positions by $1.6 million.

As of February 2, 2008, the liability for uncertain tax positions reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets was $2.4 million, including accrued interest of $1.0 million.with a corresponding increase to retained earnings.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is provided below. Amounts presented excluded interest and penalties, where applicable, on unrecognized tax benefits:

(Amounts in thousands)
Unrecognized tax benefits at February 4, 2007		$3,169
Increases in tax positions from prior years		95
Decreases in tax positions from prior years		(10	)
Increases in tax positions for current year		-
Settlements		-
Lapse of applicable statute of limitations		(97	)
Unrecognized tax benefits at February 2, 2008		$3,157

(Amounts in thousands)
Unrecognized tax benefits at February 4, 2008		$	3,157
Increases in tax positions from prior years			132
Decreases in tax positions from prior years			(10	)
Increases in tax positions for current year			—
Settlements			—
Lapse of applicable statute of limitations			(899	)
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 31, 2009		$	2,380

As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the Company had $3.2$2.4 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, $2.4$1.7 million of which would affect the Company’s tax rate if recognized. While it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease within the next twelve months, the Company does not expect the change to have a significant impact on its results of operations or financial position.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. The Company has substantially concluded all federal income tax matters through Fiscal 20002007 and all material state and local income tax matters through Fiscal 2003.

The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and penalties associated with its unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations. During Fiscal 2007,2008, the Company accrued a provision for interest and penalties of $0.2$0.5 million. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the Company hadliability for uncertain tax positions reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets was $2.2 million, including accrued interest and penalties of $1.0 million related to uncertain tax positions.$1.2 million.

Note 7. Leases

Leases—lessee

As more fully discussed in Note 10 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company leases its Albany, NY distribution center and administrative offices under three capital lease arrangements with its Chief Executive Officer and largest shareholder.

Fixed assets recorded under capital leases, which are included in fixed assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, are as follows:

			February  2,			February 3,				January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
			2008			2007
			($ in thousands)							($ in thousands)
Buildings		$	9,342			$	9,342			$	9,342		$	9,342
Fixtures and equipment			12,824				12,824				12,824			12,824
			22,166				22,166
Allowances for depreciation
and amortization			(13,120	)			(10,325	)
		$	9,046			$	11,841				22,166			22,166
Allowances for depreciation and amortization											(15,926	)		(13,120	)
										$	6,240		$	11,841

At February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, the Company leased 812712 stores under operating leases, many of which contain renewal options, for periods ranging from fiveone to twenty-five years, with the majority being ten years. Most leases also provide for payment of operating expenses and real estate taxes. Some also provide for additional rent based on a percentage of sales.

Net rental expense was as follows:

											Fiscal Year
		Fiscal Year									2008			2007			2006
			2007			2006			2005
		($ in thousands)									($ in thousands)
Minimum rentals		$	123,303		$	130,802		$	108,581		$	102,647		$	123,303		$	130,802
Contingent rentals			849			1,453			1,226			581			849			1,453
		$	124,152		$	132,255		$	109,807
											$	103,228		$	124,152		$	132,255

Future minimum rental payments required under all leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year at February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 are as follows:

				Operating		Capital
				Leases		Leases			Operating Leases			Capital Leases
				($ in thousands)
2008			$	96,977		$	4,841
									($ in thousands)
2009	2009			67,891			4,841		$	80,048		$	4,841
2010	2010			45,726			2,841			50,365			2,841
2011	2011			29,325			2,095			31,895			2,095
2012	2012			21,155			2,095			21,719			2,095
2013										15,168			2,095
Thereafter	Thereafter			36,130			5,794			21,144			3,700
Total minimum payments required	Total minimum payments required		$	297,204		$	22,507		$	220,339			17,667
Less: amounts representing interest							10,507						8,631
Present value of minimum lease payments	Present value of minimum lease payments						12,000						9,036
Less: current portion	Less: current portion						2,964						3,178
Long-term capital lease obligations	Long-term capital lease obligations					$	9,036					$	5,858

In addition to the obligations in the table above, a significant number of the Company’s stores have leases which have rent payments based on the store’s sales volume in lieu of fixed minimum rent payments. During Fiscal 2008, minimum rent payments based on a store’s sales volume were $8.4 million.

Interest rates on capital leases were between 5.65% and 31.5%33.2% per annum.

Leases—lessor

The Company, as lessor, entered into a 60 year lease, which is effective April 2009, covering the real property owned by the Company in Miami, Florida. Under the provisions of the lease, the Company receives minimum monthly rent payments as follows:

		Annual Rent Payment			Total Payments
		($ in thousands)
April 2009 – March 2029		$	1,620		$	32,400
April 2029 – March 2039			1,782			17,820
April 2039 – March 2049			1,960			19,602
April 2049 – March 2059			2,156			21,560
April 2059 – March 2069			2,372			23,718
Total future payments					$	115,100

The lease allows for the tenant to terminate the lease after the twenty fifth year and every five years thereafter. Total guaranteed rent payments due to the Company are $41.3 million. The Company didn’t record any rental income on the lease in 2008.

Note 8. Benefit Plans

401(k) Savings Plan

The Company offers a 401(k) Savings Plan to eligible employees meeting certain age and service requirements. This plan permits participants to contribute up to 80% of their salary, including bonuses, up to the maximum allowable by IRS regulations. Participants are immediately vested in their voluntary contributions plus actual earnings thereon. Participant vesting of the Company’s matching and profit sharing contribution is based on the years of service completed by the participant. Participants are fully vested upon the completion of four years of service. All participant forfeitures of non-vested benefits are used to reduce the Company’s contributions in future years. Total expense related to the Plan was approximately $882,000, $1,042,000 $1,003,000 and $957,000$1,003,000 in Fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, and 2005, respectively. As of February 1, 2009, the Company has postponed its matching contribution.

Stock Award Plans

The Company has five employee stock award plans, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Stock Option Plan, the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “Old Plans”); and the 2005 Long Term Incentive Share Plan (the “New Plan”). Additionally, the Company has a stock award plan for non-employee directors (the “1990 Plan”). The Company no longer issues stock options under the Old Plans. Under the New Plan, the Company generally issues Stock-Settled Appreciation Rights (“SSARS”) that become exercisable in 50% increments commencing three years from the date of grant and have a maximum term of ten years from issuance. Under the 1990 Plan, awards generally become exercisable commencing one year from the date of grant in increments of 25% per year with a maximum term of ten years. In addition, directors of the Company receive annual grants of deferred shares of Common Stock (“Deferred Shares”) issued under the 1990 Plan which vest equally in three years from date of grant.

Stock options and SSARS authorized for issuance under the Old Plans, New Plan and 1990 Plan total 20.6 million. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, of the awards authorized for issuance under the Old Plans, New Plan and 1990 Plan, 9.08.5 million were granted and are outstanding, 6.7 million of which were vested and exercisable. Options available for future grants at February 2, 2008January 31, 2009 and February 3, 20072008 were 3.2 million and 3.3 million, respectively.

During Fiscal 2008, the Company issued 275,000 restricted stock units. Restricted stock units vest 50% after two years and 3.7 million, respectively.50% after three years and will be settled in cash upon vesting. During Fiscal 2008, the Company recognized $17,000 in expenses related to the grant of restricted stock units.

The following table summarizes information about the stock awards outstanding under the Old Plans, New Plan and 1990 Plan as of February 2, 2008:January 31, 2009:

		Outstanding										Exercisable
						Weighted						Weighted
				Average		Average		Aggregate				Average		Aggregate		Outstanding												Exercisable
Exercise				Remaining		Exercise		Intrinsic				Exercise		Intrinsic
Price Range		Shares		Life		Price		Value		Shares		Price		Value
Exercise Price Range																Shares			Average Remaining Life			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic Value			Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$0.00-$2.66		355,400		7.9		$0.00		$1,492,680		79,460		$0.00		$333,732			510,191			8.1		$	0.02			373,868			77,526		$	0.00			56,811
2.67-5.33		2,481,041		6.3		4.11		224,534		1,145,191		3.50		801,634			2,376,615			5.1			4.06			—			1,610,215			3.50			—
5.34-8.00		883,575		8.4		6.19		---		155,000		7.02		---			788,775			7.2			6.25			—			187,500			7.11			—
8.01-10.00		1,852,859		3.7		8.45		---		1,852,859		8.45		---			1,760,169			2.6			8.46			—			1,760,169			8.46			—
10.01-13.33		2,028,100		4.1		10.84		---		2,020,600		10.83		---			1,891,425			3.0			10.86			—			1,891,425			10.86			—
13.34-16.00		1,265,370		5.3		14.57		---		1,265,370		14.57		---			1,131,290			4.4			14.57			—			1,131,290			14.57			—
16.01-18.67		154,050		0.2		17.79		---		154,050		17.79		---
Total		9,020,395		5.3		$8.26		$1,717,214		6,672,530		$9.56		$1,135,366			8,458,465			4.4		$	7.86			373,868			6,658,125		$	8.84			56,811

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pretax intrinsic value based on the Company’s closing stock price of $4.20$0.76 as of February 1, 2008,January 30, 2009, which would have been received by the award holders had all award holders under the Old Plans, New Plan and 1990 Plan exercised their awards as of that date. The total number ofThere were no in-the-money awards exercisable as of February 2, 2008 was 1,224,651.January 31, 2009.

The following table summarizes activity under the Stock Award Plans:

		Employee and Director Stock Award Plans
		Number of		Stock Award		Weighted		Employee and Director Stock Award Plans
		Shares Subject		Exercise Price		Average
		To Option		Range Per Share(1)		Exercise Price		Number of Shares Subject To Option			Stock Award Exercise Price Range Per Share(1)			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance January 29, 2005		9,298,096		$1.21-$23.75		$8.16
Granted		1,420,241		7.10-14.32		12.45
Exercised		(712,977)		1.21-12.44		5.84
Canceled*		(145,548)		3.50-17.79		8.79
Balance January 28, 2006		9,859,812		$1.58-$23.75		$8.94			9,859,812			$1.58-$23.75		$	8.94
Granted		1,092,675		5.32-7.29		4.86			1,092,675			5.32-7.29			4.86
Exercised		(267,262)		1.58-3.96		2.40			(267,262	)		1.58-3.96			2.40
Canceled*		(626,371)		2.80-17.79		8.58			(626,371	)		2.80-17.79			8.58
Balance February 3, 2007		10,058,854		$3.16-$23.75		$8.70			10,058,854			$3.16-$23.75		$	8.70
Granted		654,716		4.80-5.50		4.43			654,716			4.80-5.50			4.43
Exercised		(272,802)		3.16-3.96		3.45			(272,802	)		3.16-3.96			3.45
Canceled*		(1,420,373)		3.50-23.75		10.51
Forfeited									(900,000	)		11.20			11.20
Canceled									(520,373	)		3.50-23.75			5.01
Balance February 2, 2008		9,020,395		$3.50-$17.79		$8.26			9,020,395			$3.50-$17.79		$	8.26
Granted									431,728			1.16-2.91			2.66
Exercised									(94,825	)		3.50			3.50
Forfeited									(569,371	)		3.50-17.79			12.47
Canceled									(329,462	)		3.50-13.28			2.93
Balance January 31, 2009									8,458,465			$1.16-$15.25		$	7.86

(1) Exercise price ranges do not include the impact of deferred or restricted shares that were granted at an exercise price of $0.

* During Fiscal 2007, 900,000 of the stock awards that were cancelled represented stock options that were granted in Fiscal 1997 and expired out-of-the-money. No stock awards expired in Fiscal 2006 and 2005.

(1)	Exercise price ranges do not include the impact of deferred or restricted shares and restricted stock units that were granted at an exercise price of $0.

During Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, the Company recognized expenses of approximately $213,000, $526,000 $477,000 and $296,000,$477,000, respectively, for deferred shares issued to non-employee directors at an exercise price below the closing stock price on the date of grant.

Restricted Stock Plan

Under the 1990 Restricted Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is authorized to grant awards for up to 900,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to executive officers and other key employees of the Company. The shares are issued as restricted stock and are held in the custody of the Company until all vesting restrictions are satisfied. If conditions or terms under which an award is granted are not satisfied, the shares are forfeited. Shares vest under these grants over a period of two to five years, with vesting criteria that includes continuous employment until applicable vesting dates have expired. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, a total of 330,000 shares have been granted, of which 240,000 shares have vested and 90,000 shares had been forfeited. Unearned compensation is recorded at the date of award, based on the market value of the shares, and is amortized over the applicable vesting period. The amount amortized to expense in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, net of the impact of forfeitures, was approximately $62,000, $54,000 $13,000 and $16,000,$13,000, respectively. As of February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, there were no outstanding awards and shares available for grant totaled 660,000.

Defined Benefit Plans

The Company maintains a non-qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for certain Executive Officers of the Company. The SERP, which is unfunded, provides eligible executives defined pension benefits that supplement benefits under other retirement arrangements. The annual benefit amount is based on salary and bonus at the time of retirement and number of years of service.

The Company provides the Board of Directors with a noncontributory, unfunded retirement plan (“Director Retirement Plan”) that pays a retired director an annual retirement benefit equal to 60% of the annual retainer at the time of retirement plus a 3% annual increase through the final payment. Payments begin at age 62 or retirement, whichever is later, and continue for 10 years or the life of the director and his or her spouse, whichever period is shorter. Partial vesting in the retirement plan begins after six years of continuous service. Participants become fully vested after 12 years of continuous service on the Board. After June 1, 2003, new directors were not covered by the Director Retirement Plan. Directors who were not yet vested in their retirement benefits as of June 1, 2003 had the present value of benefits already accrued as of the effective date converted to Deferred Shares under the 1990 Plan. Directors that were fully or partially vested in their retirement benefits were given a one time election to continue to participate in the current retirement program or convert the present value of benefits already accrued to Deferred Shares under the 1990 Plan as of the effective date.

The Company accounts for the SERP and the Director Retirement Plan in accordance with SFAS NoNo. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires that the funded status of defined benefit pension plans, or the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation, be

recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This differs from the accounting under SFAS No. 87, which required the difference between the

fair value of plan assets and the accumulated benefit obligation to be recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. SFAS No. 158 also requires that defined benefit plan assets and obligations be measured as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position; however, this requirement of the statement is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company has not adopted this provision of SFAS No. 158adjusted its measurement date for the year ended February 2, 2008;however this provision will be adopted in accordance with the aforementioned requirements.ForFiscal 2008 to January 31, 2009. For Fiscal 2007, and 2006, the measurement date for the plans iswas November 1.

For Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007 2006 and 2005,Fiscal 2006, net periodic benefit cost recognized under both plans totaled approximately $1.4 million, $1.3 million, $2.2 million, and $1.9$2.2 million, respectively. The accrued pension liability for both plans was approximately $11.9 million and $14.2 million at January 31, 2009 and $13.3 million at February 2, 2008, respectively, and February 3, 2007, respectively.is recorded within Other long term liabilities. The accumulated benefit obligation for both plans was approximately $13.5$9.7 million and $12.8$13.5 million as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007, respectively.

The following is a summary of the Company’s defined benefit pension plans as of the most recent actuarial calculations:

Obligation and Funded Status:
		February 2,				February 3,
		2008				2007
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:		($ in thousands)
Benefit obligation at beginning of year		$	13,276			$	16,108
Service cost			216				679
Interest cost			763				885
Actuarial gain			(30	)			(4,346	)
Benefits paid			(50	)			(50	)
Projected Benefit obligation at end of year		$	14,175			$	13,276
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		$	-			$	-
Reconciliation of Funded Status:
Funded status		$	(14,175	)		$	(13,276	)
Unrecognized prior service cost			3,058				3,400
Unrecognized net actuarial gain			(199	)			(171	)
Accrued benefit cost			(11,316	)			(10,047	)
Additional liability			(2,859	)			(3,229	)
Accrued pension liability		$	(14,175	)		$	(13,276	)

* The actuarial gain of $4.3 million in Fiscal 2006 was due to the non-vested termination of two plan participants, an increase in the discount rate from 5.50% to 5.75%Obligation and a 5 year extension of the assumed retirement age for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.Funded Status:

										January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
										($ in thousands)
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year										$	14,175		$	13,276
Service cost											273			216
Interest cost											1,114			763
Actuarial gain											(3,597	)		(30	)
Benefits paid											(52	)		(50	)
Projected Benefit obligation at end of year										$	11,913		$	14,175
Fair value of plan assets at end of year										$	—		$	—
Reconciliation of Funded Status:
Funded status										($	11,913	)	($	14,175	)
Unrecognized prior service cost											2,630			3,058
Unrecognized net actuarial gain											(3,793	)		(199	)
Accrued benefit cost											(13,076	)		(11,316	)
Decrease (increase) in liability											1,163			(2,859	)
Accrued pension liability										($	11,913	)	($	14,175	)
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
			February 2,			February 3,
			2008				2007
			($ in thousands)							January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
											($ in thousands)
Accrued pension liability		$	(14,175	)		$	(13,276	)		($	11,913	)	($	14,175	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			1,625				1,888
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss											(1,163	)		1,625
Deferred tax asset			1,234				1,341				1,234			1,234
Net amount recognized		$	(11,316	)		$	(10,047	)		($	11,842	)	($	11,316	)

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss: ($ in thousands)
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss:						Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Amounts Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss:
($ in thousands)						($ in thousands)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost:	Fiscal Year					Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
							Fiscal Year
							2008			2007				2006
	2007		2006		2005
Service cost	$    216		$    679		$    531			$218			$216				$679
Interest cost	763		885		782			891			763				885
Amortization of prior service cost	342		343		342			342			342				343
Amortization of net (gain) loss	(2)		275		243			(2	)		(2	)			275
Net periodic benefit cost	$ 1,319		$ 2,182		$ 1,898			$1,449			$1,319				$2,182
Other Changes in Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other
Comprehensive (Income) Loss:
Net prior service cost recognized as a component of net periodic benefit
cost	$(342)		$(343)
Net actuarial gain (loss) recognized as a component of net periodic
benefit cost	2		(275)
Other Changes in Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss:						Other Changes in Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss:
Net prior service cost recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost								($427	)		($342	)
Net actuarial gain (loss) recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost								3			2
Net actuarial (gain) loss arising during the period	(30)		(3,598)					(3,597	)		(30	)
	(370)		(4,216)
								(4,021	)		(370	)
Income tax effect	107		1,771					—			107
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss	$(263)		$(2,445)					($4,021	)		($263	)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost
and other comprehensive (income) loss	$1,056		$(263)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive (income) loss								($2,604	)		$1,056

The pre-tax components of accumulated other comprehensive loss (income), which have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 are summarized below.

($ in thousands)		February 2,		February 3,		January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
		2008		2007
Net unrecognized actuarial gain		$ (199)		$ (171)			($3,734	)		($199	)
Net unrecognized prior service cost		3,058		3,400			2,631			3,058
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		$2,859		$3,229
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)							($1,103	)		$2,859

In Fiscal 2008, approximately $427,000$342,000 of net unrecognized prior service cost and approximately $3,000 of the net unrecognized actuarial gain, recorded as components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at February 2, 2008,January 31, 2009, will be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost.

Assumptions:
		Fiscal Year
		2007		2006
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine
benefit obligation:
Discount rate		6.25%		5.75%
Salary increase rate		4.00%		4.00%
Measurement date		Nov 1, 2007		Nov 1, 2006
		Fiscal Year
		2007		2006		2005
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine
net periodic benefit cost:
Discount rate		6.25%		5.75%		5.50%
Salary increase rate		4.00%		4.00%		4.00%

Assumptions:

		Fiscal Year
		2008			2007
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:
Discount rate			6.75%			6.25%
Salary increase rate			4.00%			4.00%
Measurement date		Jan 31, 2009			Nov 1, 2007
		Fiscal Year
		2008			2007			2006
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
Discount rate			6.75%			6.25%			5.75%
Salary increase rate			4.00%			4.00%			4.00%

The discount rate is based on the rates implicit in high-quality fixed-income investments currently available as of the measurement date. The Citigroup Pension Discount Curve (CPDC) rates are intended to represent the spot rates implied by the high quality corporate bond market in the U.S. The projected benefit payments attributed to the projected benefit obligation have been discounted using the CPDC mid-year rates and the discount rate is the single constant rate that produces the same total present value.

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

Year		Pension Benefits
		($ in thousands)
2008		$51
2009		64
2010		101
2011		143
2012		1,356
2013 and thereafter		$6,749

Year		Pension Benefits
		($ in thousands)
2009		$	64
2010			101
2011			143
2012			1,100
2013			1,101
2014 and thereafter			5,683

Note 9. Shareholders’ Equity

The Company has never declared dividends on its Common Stock and does not plan to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The Company’s credit agreementCredit Facility does not restrict the payment of cash dividends so long as payment conditions per the agreement are met. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends will depend upon capital requirements, limitations imposed by the Company’s Credit AgreementFacility (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and other factors the Company’s Board of Directors may consider.

Note 10. Related Party Transactions

The Company leases its 181,300 square foot distribution center/office facility in Albany, New York from Robert J. Higgins, its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and largest shareholder, under three capital leases that expire in the year 2015. The original distribution center/office facility was occupied in 1985.

Under the three capital leases, dated April 1, 1985, November 1, 1989 and September 1, 1998, (the “Leases”), the Company paid Mr. Higgins an annual rent of $2.0$2.1 million, $2.0 million and $1.9$2.0 million in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 respectively. Pursuant to the terms of the lease agreements, effective January 1, 2002 and every two years thereafter, rental payments will increase in accordance with the biennial increase in the Consumer Price Index. Under the terms of the lease agreements, the Company is responsible for property taxes, insurance and other operating costs with respect to the premises. Mr. Higgins’ obligation for principal and interest on his underlying indebtedness relating to the real property is approximately $1.1 million per year. None of the leases contain any real property purchase options at the expiration of its term.

The Company leases oneof its retail stores from Mr. Higgins under an operating lease. Annual rental payments under this lease were $40,000 in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005.2006. Under the terms of the lease, the Company pays property taxes, maintenance and a contingent rental if a specified sales level is achieved. Total additional charges for the store, including contingent rent, were approximately $7,400, $3,800 $4,100 and $4,400$4,100 in Fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 and 2005 respectively.

The Company occasionally utilizes privately chartered aircraft owned or partially owned by Mr. Higgins, for Company business. The Company charters an aircraft from Crystal Jet, a corporation wholly-owned by Mr. Higgins, for Company business. Payments to Crystal Jet aggregated approximately $0, $11,000$0 and $6,000$11,000 in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 2005,2006, respectively. The Company also charters an aircraft from Richmor Aviation Inc., an unaffiliated corporation that leases an aircraft owned by Mr. Higgins, for Company business. Payments to Richmor Aviation Inc., to charter the aircraft owned by Mr. Higgins, in Fiscal 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 were approximately $205,000, $29,000 $526,000 and $276,000,$526,000, respectively.

Note 11. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

																							Fiscal 2008 Quarter Ended
			Fiscal 2007 Quarter Ended																				2008			January 31, 2009			November 1, 2008			August 2, 2008			May 3, 2008
			2007				2/02/08				11/03/07					8/04/07				5/05/07
			($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)																				($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Net sales		$	1,265,658			$	451,476			$	260,570			$		267,305			$	286,307				$987,625			$344,655			$195,193			$215,226			$232,551
Gross profit			445,747				152,072				91,332					97,962				104,381				330,895			106,626			65,411			75,870			82,988
Net loss		$	(99,435	)		$	(66,029	)		$	(14,263	)		$		(10,074	)		$	(9,069	)			($68,955	)		($9,457	)		($28,442	)		($19,230	)		($11,826	)
Basic and diluted loss per share		$	(3.20	)		$	(2.12	)		$	(0.46	)		$		(0.32	)		$	(0.29	)			($2.21	)		($0.30	)		($0.91	)		($0.62	)		($0.38	)

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $15.2 million related to the write down of certain long-lived assets at underperforming locations. See Note 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail regarding the impairment charge.

		Fiscal 2007 Quarter Ended
		2007			February 2, 2008			November 3, 2007			August 4, 2007			May 5, 2007
		($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Net sales			$1,265,658			$451,476			$260,570			$267,305			$286,307
Gross profit			445,747			152,072			91,332			97,962			104,381
Net loss			($99,435	)		($66,029	)		($14,263	)		($10,074	)		($9,069	)
Basic and diluted loss per share			($3.20	)		($2.12	)		($0.46	)		($0.32	)		($0.29	)

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2007, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $30.7 million related to the write down of certain long-lived assets at underperforming locations. In addition, during the fourth quarter, the Company recorded a charge of $42.5 million to provide a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets. See Note 4 and Note 6, respectively in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail regarding the impairment charge and valuation allowance.

			Fiscal 2006 Quarter Ended
			2006			2/03/07			10/28/06				7/29/06				4/29/06
			($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Net sales		$	1,471,157		$	586,680		$	297,679			$	298,261			$	288,537
Gross profit			519,222			203,755			108,811				106,212				100,444
Income (loss) before extraordinary
gain - unallocated negative goodwill			948			32,461			(13,305	)			(10,217	)			(7,991	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill,
net of income taxes			10,721			5,387			1,925				2,475				934
Net income (loss)		$	11,669		$	37,848		$	(11,380	)		$	(7,742	)		$	(7,057	)
Basic earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary
gain – unallocated negative goodwill		$	0.03		$	1.05		$	(0.43	)		$	(0.33	)		$	(0.26	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill,
net of income taxes			0.35		$	0.18		$	0.06			$	0.08			$	0.03
Basic earnings (loss) per share		$	0.38		$	1.23		$	(0.37	)		$	(0.25	)		$	(0.23	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary
gain – unallocated negative goodwill		$	0.03		$	1.00		$	(0.43	)		$	(0.33	)		$	(0.26	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill,
net of income taxes			0.33			0.17			0.06				0.08				0.03
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		$	0.36		$	1.17		$	(0.37	)		$	(0.25	)		$	(0.23	)

Index to Exhibits
Document Number and Description

Exhibit No.

2.1	Asset Acquisition Agreement dated February 17, 2006, between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Musicland Holding Corp.- incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2006. Commission File No. 000-14818.
Index to Exhibits
Document Number and Description
Exhibit No.
3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 1994. Commission File No. 0-14818.
3.2	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 29, 1994. Commission File No. 0-14818.
3.3	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1998. Commission File No. 0-14818.
3.4	*3.4 Amended By-Laws --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2000. Commission File No. 0-14818.

3.5	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation—incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, No. 333-75231.
3.6	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation—incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, No. 333-75231.
3.7	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation—incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 11,15, 2000. Commission File No. 0-14818.
3.8	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Trans World Entertainment Corporation - incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-A filed August 11,15, 2000. Commission File No. 0-14818.
4.1	Credit Agreement dated January 5, 2006, between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Bank of America N.A. - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 10, 2006. Commission File No. 0-14818.
4.2	First Amendment to Credit Agreement between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Bank of America N.A – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23,29, 2006. Commission File No. 0-14818.
4.3	Second Amendment to Credit Agreement between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Bank of America N.A – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 23, 2006. Commission File No. 0-14818.
4.4	Rights Agreement, between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent – incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-A filed August 11,15, 2000. Commission File No. 0-14818.
4.5	Amendment No. 1 to the Rights Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2000, between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Mellon Investor Services LLC (as successor in interest to ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C.) – incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-A12G/A filed November 27, 2007. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.1	Lease, dated April 1, 1985, between Robert J. Higgins, as Landlord, and Record Town, Inc. and Trans World Music Corporation, as Tenant and Amendment thereto dated April 28, 1986 --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-6449.
10.2	Second Addendum, dated as of November 30, 1989, to Lease, dated April 1, 1985, among Robert J. Higgins, and Trans World Music Corporation, and Record Town, Inc., exercising five year renewal option --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 1990. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.3	Lease, dated November 1, 1989, between Robert J. Higgins, as Landlord, and Record Town, Inc. and Trans World Music Corporation, as Tenant --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 1991. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.5	Lease dated September 1, 1998, between Robert J. Higgins, as Landlord, and Record Town, Inc. and Trans World Music Corporation, as Tenant, for additional office space at 38 Corporate Circle --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 1998. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.6	Trans World Music Corporation 1986 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, and Amendment No. 3 thereto -- incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 1991. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.7      10.6	Trans World Music Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated --— incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to Trans World’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 19, 2000. Commission File No. 0- 14818.0-14818.
10.8      10.7	Trans World Entertainment Corporation Amended 1990 Restricted Stock Plan --— incorporated herein by reference to Annex B to Trans World’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 17,19, 1999. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.9      10.8	Trans World Entertainment Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan --— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 1994. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.10      10.9	Trans World Entertainment Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan --— incorporated herein by reference to Annex B to Trans World’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 7, 1998. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.11      10.10	Trans World Entertainment Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan --— incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to Trans World’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 7, 1998. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.12      10.11	Form of Indemnification Agreement dated May 1, 1995 between the Company and its officers and directors incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.110.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 1995. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.13      10.12	Trans World Entertainment Corporation 1997 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, --as amended — incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly ReportForm 8-K filed on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 3, 1997.December 19, 2008. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.14      10.13	Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2003,December 26, 2008, between the Company and Robert J. Higgins. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1710.1 to the Company’s Annual ReportForm 8-K filed on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2003.December 29, 2008. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.15	Agreement dated September 19, 2003 by and between a joint venture composed of Trans World Entertainment Corporation, Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC, Hilco Real Estate, LLC Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC and The Ozer Group LLC as Agent and Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc., as Merchant to acquire certain assets of Wherehouse Entertainment Inc. -- incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003. Commission File No. 0-14818.
10.16	Amendment No.1 dated October 1, 2003 to the agency agreement dated September 19, 2003 -- incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003. Commission File No. 0-14818.10.15
10.17	Trans World Entertainment Corporation 2005 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to Trans World Entertainment Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 11, 2005. Commission File No. 0-14818.
* 21	Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
* 23	Consent of KPMG LLP.
*31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer dated April 17, 2008,16, 2009, relating to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15a-14(a).
*31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer dated April 17, 2008,16, 2009, relating to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15a-14(a).

 

**32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, dated April 17, 2008,16, 2009, pursuant to 18 U. S. C.U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2008.January 31, 2009.
99.1		Consent and Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2007, by and among Robert J. Higgins, Riley Investment Management LLC and Trans World Entertainment Corporation—incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8- K filed November 27, 2007. Commission File No. 0-14818. * Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith

*Filed herewith.

F-28F-26

---