Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)
(Mark One)  
þ
ý

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009
or

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

or

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From                             to                            
For the Transition Period From           to

Commission File Number 001-13357

Royal Gold, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware84-0835164

(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
 84-0835164
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1660 Wynkoop Street, Suite 1000

Denver, Colorado
80202

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 


80202

(Zip Code)
Registrant’s

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (303) 573-1660

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common stock, $0.01 par value NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None



None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 Yesþý    Noo

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
 Yeso    Noþý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþý    Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso    Noo

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sregistrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”"accelerated filer", “large"large accelerated filer”filer" and “smaller"smaller reporting company”company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

(Check one): 
Large accelerated filerþý Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filero
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso    Noþý

Aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of Royal Gold common stock on December 31, 2008,2009, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $1,517,565,636. As of August 14, 2009, there$1,794,606,869. There were 40,763,19553,671,158 shares of the registrant’sCompany's common stock, $0.01 par value issued$0.01 per share, outstanding as of August 24, 2010. In addition, as of such date, there were 1,610,464 exchangeable shares of RG Exchangeco Inc., a subsidiary of registrant, outstanding which are exchangeable at any time into shares of the Company's common stock on a one-for-one basis and outstanding.

entitle their holders to dividend and other rights economically equivalent to those of the Company's common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20092010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on November 18, 2009,17, 2010, and to be filed within 120 days after June 30, 2009,2010, are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.



INDEX

PAGE

Page

PART I.

    

ITEM 1.

 

Business

 2
1

ITEM 1A.

 

Risk Factors


9

ITEM 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments


18

ITEM 2.

Properties


18

ITEM 3.

Legal Proceedings


40

ITEM 4.

(Removed and Reserved)


40

PART II.

    

ITEM 1A.5.

 9
ITEM 1B.19
ITEM 2.19
ITEM 3.42
ITEM 4.42
PART II.
ITEM 5.

 43
41

ITEM 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 
42

ITEM 7.

 
ITEM 6.44
ITEM 7.

 45
42

ITEM 7A.

 
ITEM 7A.

 63
62

ITEM 8.

 
ITEM 8.

 64
63

ITEM 9.

 
ITEM 9.

 97
95

ITEM 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures


95

ITEM 9B.

Other Information


96

PART III.

    

ITEM 9A.10.

 97
ITEM 9B.98
PART III.
ITEM 10.

 98
97

ITEM 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 
97

ITEM 12.

 
ITEM 11.98
ITEM 12.

 99
97

ITEM 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


97

ITEM 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services


97

PART IV.

    

ITEM 13.15.

 99
ITEM 14.99
PART IV.
ITEM 15.

 99
98

SIGNATURES

 
99

EXHIBIT INDEX

 
SIGNATURES
100
100
EXHIBIT INDEX101
EX-10.46
EX-21.1
EX-23.1
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

1


Table of Contents

This document (including information incorporated herein by reference) contains “forward-looking statements”"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which involve a degree of risk and uncertainty due to various factors affecting Royal Gold, Inc. and its subsidiaries. For a discussion of some of these factors, see the discussion in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this report. In addition, please see our note about forward-looking statements included in Item 7, Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“("MD&A”&A"), of this report.


PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS
ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Overview

Royal Gold, Inc. (“("Royal Gold”Gold", the “Company”"Company", “we”"we", “us”"us", or “our”"our"), together with its subsidiaries, is engaged in the business of acquiring and managing precious metals royalties.royalties and similar interests derived from production. Royalties are passive (non-operating) interests in mining projects that provideentitle the rightCompany to a portion of the revenue or production from the project after deducting specified costs, if any. We seek to acquire existing royalties or to finance projects that are in production or in development stage in exchange for royalty interests. We are engaged in a continual review of opportunities to acquire existing royalties, to create new royalties through the financing of mine development or exploration, or to acquire companies that hold royalties. We currently, and generally at any time, have acquisition opportunities in various stages of active review, including, for example, our engagement of consultants and advisors to analyze particular opportunities, analysis of technical, financial legal and other confidential information, submission of indications of interest, participation in preliminary discussions and involvement as a bidder in competitive auctions.

During the fiscal year 2009,

        As of June 30, 2010, the Company received royalty revenue fromowns royalties on 33 producing properties, 23 producing properties. In addition, we own royalty interests on 10 development stage properties and over 80130 exploration stage properties, of which the Company considers 2537 to be evaluation stage projects.projects.32 producing properties. The Company uses “evaluation stage”"evaluation stage" to describe exploration stage properties that contain mineralized material and on which operators are engaged in the search for reserves. We do not conduct mining operations nor are we required to contribute to capital costs, exploration costs, environmental compliance costs or other operating costs on the properties in which we hold royalty interests. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, we focused on the management of our existing royalty interests, the acquisition of royalty interests, the acquisition and integration of International Royalty Corporation ("IRC"), and the creation of royalty and similar interests through financing and strategic exploration alliances.

As discussed in further detail throughout this report, some significant developments to our business during fiscal year 20092010 were as follows:

    (1)
    Our royalty revenues increased 85% to $136.6 million, compared with $73.8 million during fiscal year 2009;

    (2)
    On January 25, 2010, we acquired an interest in the gold produced from the sulfide portion of the Andacollo project in Chile ("Andacollo Royalty") for $217.9 million in cash and 1,204,136 shares of our common stock (valued at approximately $53.4 million on the date of acquisition);

    (3)
    On February 22, 2010, we, through RG Exchangeco Inc. (formerly known as 7296355 Canada Ltd.), a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Royal Gold ("RG Exchangeco") acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of IRC, a company incorporated in Canada (the "IRC Transaction"). The purchase price for the IRC Transaction consisted of approximately $350.0 million in cash, 5,234,086 shares of Royal Gold common stock (valued at $230.4 million on the date of acquisition) and 1,806,649 exchangeable shares of

(1)Our royalty revenues increased 11% to $73.8 million, compared with $66.3 million during fiscal year 2008;
(2)On October 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of 72 royalties from Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”) for cash of approximately $181.3 million, including a restructuring of the Company’s GSR2, GSR3 and NVR1 royalties, valued at $31.5 million, for net cash of approximately $150 million. The royalty portfolio acquired from Barrick has generated approximately $12.2 million in royalty revenue to the Company from the completion of the acquisition on October 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009;
(3)In October 2008, the Company increased its existing credit facility from $80 million to $125 million and extended the maturity date to October 30, 2013;
(4)In April 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement with a Chilean subsidiary of Teck Resources Limited (“Teck”), Compañía Minera Teck Carmen de Andacollo (“CDA”), to acquire

2Table of Contents

      RG Exchangeco (valued at $79.5 million on the date of acquisition) that are exchangeable at any time into shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis ("Exchangeable Shares");

    (4)
    In June 2010, we sold 5,980,000 shares of our common stock, at a price of $48.50 per share, resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $276.2 million; and

    (5)
    We increased our calendar year dividend to $0.36 per basic share, which is paid in quarterly installments throughout calendar year 2010. This represents a 12.5% increase compared with the dividend paid during calendar year 2009.


an interest in the gold produced from the sulfide portion of the Andacollo project in Chile. We refer to this transaction throughout this report as the “Teck Transaction;”
(5)In April 2009, we sold 6,500,000 shares of our common stock, at a price of $38.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $235.3 million; and
(6)We increased our calendar year dividend to $0.32 per basic share, which is paid in quarterly installments throughout calendar year 2009. This represents a 14% increase compared with the dividend paid during calendar year 2008.
Certain Definitions

Additional Mineralized Material:Additional mineralized material is that part of a mineral system that has potential economic significance but cannot be included in the proven and probable ore reserve estimates until further drilling and metallurgical work is completed, and until other economic and technical feasibility factors based upon such work have been resolved. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”"SEC") does not recognize this term. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

Gross Proceeds Royalty (GPR):A royalty in which payments are made on contained ounces rather than recovered ounces.

Gross Smelter Return (GSR) Royalty:A defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation, in certain cases reduced by certain contract-defined costs paid by or charged to the operator.

g/t:A unit representing grams per tonne.

        Net Profits Interest (NPI):    A defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation, after recovery of certain contract-defined pre-production costs, and after deduction of certain contract-defined mining, milling, processing, transportation, administrative, marketing and other costs.

Net Smelter Return (NSR) Royalty:A defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation, less a proportionate share of incidental transportation, insurance, refining and smelting costs.

Net Value Royalty (NVR):A defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation, less certain contract-defined transportation costs, milling costs and taxes.

Proven (Measured) Reserves:Reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes, and the grade is computed from the results of detailed sampling, and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that the size, shape, depth and mineral content of the reserves are well established.

Probable (Indicated) Reserves:Reserves for which the quantity and grade are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance of probable (indicated) reserves, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume geological continuity between points of observation.

Payable Metal:Ounces or pounds of metal in concentrate payable to the operator after deduction of a percentage of metal in concentrate that is paid to a third-party smelter pursuant to smelting contracts.


Table of Contents

Reserve:That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.

Royalty:The right to receive a percentage or other denomination of mineral production from a resource extraction operation.

Ton:A unit of weight equal to 2,000 pounds or 907.2 kilograms.

Tonne:A unit of weight equal to 2,204.6 pounds or 1,000 kilograms.

3


Our Producing Royalty Interests

Our producing royalty interests on mines that were in production and generated revenue tofor the Company during all or part of fiscal year 20092010 are shown in the following table. The number of properties listed here as production stage could change periodically due to developments at the properties. Please see Item 2, Properties, of this report for further discussion of our principal producing royalty interests.

Mine
LocationOperatorRoyalty
(Gold unless otherwise stated)
Cortez Nevada, USA Barrick Gold Corporation ("Barrick") GSR1: 0.40%-5.0% sliding-scale GSR
      Royalty
MineLocationOperator(Gold unless otherwise stated)
CortezNevada, USABarrickGSR1:
sliding-
GSR2(1):
sliding-
GSR3(1):
NVR1(1):GSR2:
 0.40%-5.0% scalesliding-scale GSR 0.40%-5.0% scale GSR
GSR3:0.71% GSR
NVR1:0.39% NVR

Robinson

 

Nevada, USA

 
Quadra
QuadraFNX Mining Ltd. (“Quadra”("Quadra")

 

3.0% NSR (copper, gold, silver, molybdenum)

Leeville

 

Nevada, USA

 

Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”("Newmont")

 

1.8% NSR

Goldstrike

 

Nevada, USA

 

Barrick

 

0.9% NSR

Bald Mountain

 

Nevada, USA

 

Barrick

 

1.75%-3.5% sliding-scale NSR

Twin Creeks(2)

 

Nevada, USA

 

Newmont

 

2.0% GPR

Wharf(2)

 

South Dakota, USA

 

Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp”("Goldcorp")

 

0.0%-2.0% sliding-scale NSR
Troy(3)

Skyline(1)

 
Montana,
Utah, USA

 
Revett Minerals,
Arch Coal, Inc. (“Revett”)

 
7.0% GSR (silver and copper)
1.41% GOR
Peñasquito (oxide)(4)

Dolores

 

Chihuahua, Mexico


Minefinders Corporation, Ltd. ("Minefinders")


3.25% NSR; 2.0% NSR (silver)

El Chanate(2)


Sonora, Mexico


Capital Gold Corporation


2.0%-4.0% sliding-scale NSR

Mulatos(3)


Sonora, Mexico


Alamos Gold, Inc. ("Alamos")


1.0%-5.0% sliding-scale NSR

Peñasquito(4)


Zacatecas, Mexico

 

Goldcorp

 

2.0% NSR (gold, and silver)silver, lead, zinc)
Mulatos(5)

Las Cruces(1)

 
Sonora, Mexico
Andalucía, Spain

 
Alamos Gold, Inc. (“Alamos”
Inmet Mining ("Inmet")

 
1.0%-5.0% sliding-scale
1.5% NSR (copper)
El Chanate(6)

Taparko(5)

 
Sonora, MexicoCapital Gold, Inc.2.0%-4.0% sliding-scale NSR
Dolores(7)
Chihuahua, MexicoMinefinders Corporation, Ltd. (“Minefinders”)1.25% NSR; 2.0% NSR (gold and silver)
Taparko(8)

Namantenga, Burkina Faso West Africa

 

High River Gold Mines Ltd. (“("High River”River")

 

15% GSR (TB-GSR1); 0%-10% sliding-scale GSR (TB-GSR2)
Siguiri(2,9)

Inata(1)

 
Guinea, West Africa
Soum, Burkina Faso

 
AngloGold
Avocet Mining PLC

 

2.5% NSR

Siguiri(6)


Kankan, Guinea


AngloGold Ashanti Limited


0.0%-1.875% sliding-scale NSR
Benso(10)

Martha

 
Republic of Ghana, West AfricaGolden Star Resources Ltd. (“Golden Star”)1.5% NSR
Martha
Santa Cruz Province,
Argentina

 

Coeur d’Alened'Alene Mines Corporation

 

2.0% NSR (silver)(gold and silver)

Don Mario (Lower Mineralized Zone)

 

Chiquitos Province, Bolivia

 

Orvana Minerals Corp. (“Orvana”)

 

3.0% NSR

Table of Contents

Mine
LocationOperatorRoyalty
(Gold unless otherwise stated)
El Toqui(2)
Andacollo(7)
 Region XI,IV, Chile Breakwater ResourcesCompañía Minera Teck Carmen de Andacollo ("CDA") 75% of gold produced

El Toqui


Region XI, Chile


Breakwater Resources


1.0%-3.0% sliding-scale NSR (gold, lead and zinc)
Williams
Voisey's Bay(1)

 
Ontario,
Labrador, Canada

 
Barrick
Vale Ltd. ("Vale")

 
0.72%
2.7% NSR (nickel, copper, cobalt)
Allan(2)

Williams

 

Ontario, Canada


Barrick


0.97% NSR

Allan


Saskatchewan, Canada

 

Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan

 

$0.36-$1.44 per ton sliding scale;sliding-scale; $0.25 per ton (potash)

El Limon

 

El Limon, Nicaragua

 

B2Gold Corp. (95%) and Inversiones Mineras S.A. (5%)

 

3.0% NSR

Balcooma(2)

 

Queensland, Australia

 

Kagara ZincLtd.

 

1.5% NSR (copper(gold, silver, lead, copper and zinc)

Gwalia Deeps(1)


Western Australia, Australia


St. Barbara Limited ("St. Barbara)


1.5% NSR

Mt. Goode (Cosmos South)(2)

 

Western Australia, Australia

 

Xstrata PLC

 
1.50%
1.5% NSR (nickel)

South Laverton(1)


Western Australia, Australia


Saracen Mineral Holdings Limited


1.5% NSR

Southern Cross(1)


Western Australia, Australia


St. Barbara


1.5% NSR

(1)
Royalty acquired as part of the IRC transaction as discussed within Item 7, MD&A, of this report. Three oil and gas royalty interests, not shown here, were also acquired as part of the IRC transaction.

(2)
Royalty is capped once payments of approximately $17.0 million have been received. As of June 30, 2010, approximately $12.4 million remains under the cap.

(3)
Royalty is capped at 2.0 million gold ounces of production. Approximately 581,000 cumulative ounces of gold have been produced as of June 30, 2010.

(4)
The Peñasquito project consists of oxide and sulfide ores, each processed by different methods. The sulfide portion began production during the fourth quarter of calendar 2009.

(5)
TB-GSR1 will remain in effect until cumulative production of 804,420 ounces of gold is achieved or until cumulative payments of $35.0 million have been made to Royal Gold, whichever occurs first. TB-GSR2 will remain in effect until the termination of TB-GSR1. As of June 30, 2010, we have recognized approximately $30.6 million in royalty revenue associated with TB-GSR1, which is attributable to cumulative production of 202,000 ounces of gold. Management expects the dollar cap could be reached during the third quarter of calendar year 2010.

(6)
Royalty is subject to a dollar cap of approximately $12.0 million. As of June 30, 2010, approximately $1.8 million remains under the cap. Management expects the cap could be reached sometime during the last half of calendar 2010.

(7)
Production at Andacollo began during the second quarter of calendar 2010. The royalty is 75% of the gold produced from the sulfide portion of the deposit until 910,000 payable ounces have been sold and 50% of the gold produced in excess of 910,000 payable gold ounces.

(1)As part of the Barrick transaction, as discussed within Item 7, MD&A, of this report, the GSR2 royalty rate was reduced to match the royalty rate of GSR1, and the portion of the GSR3 and NVR1 royalties on the mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit at Cortez was eliminated. The Crossroads deposit, currently in development stage, continues to be subject to the Company’s GSR2 royalty at the reduced rate. The NVR1 royalty is a 1.25% NVR royalty. The Company owns 31.6% of the 1.25% NVR (or 0.39%), while our consolidated minority interest owns the remaining portion of the 1.25% NVR royalty.
(2)Royalty acquired as part of the Barrick transaction as discussed within Item 7, MD&A, of this report.

4

Table of Contents


(3)As of June 30, 2009, the $10.5 million cap on the 7.0% GSR royalty at Troy was met. As such, the royalty will cease providing revenue to the Company effective June 30, 2009.
(4)The Peñasquito project consists of oxide and sulfide portions. The sulfide portion is classified as development stage as shown below and is estimated by Goldcorp to commence production during the second half of calendar year 2009 and reach commercial production in the first quarter of calendar year 2010.
(5)Royalty is capped at 2.0 million gold ounces of production. Approximately 416,000 cumulative ounces of gold have been produced as of June 30, 2009. As part of the Barrick transaction as discussed within Item 7, MD&A, of this report, our royalty interest at Mulatos increased to a 1.0% to 5.0% sliding-scale NSR from a 0.30% to 1.50% sliding-scale NSR.
(6)Royalty is capped once payments of approximately $17.0 million have been received. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $14.7 million remains under the cap.
(7)The first gold and silver sales were made at Dolores during the fourth quarter of calendar year 2008. The gold sales were subject to the Company’s 1.25% NSR during the period. Also, in May 2009, Minefinders announced that commercial production was reached at Dolores effective May 1, 2009. The Company’s 2.0% NSR royalty applies to gold and silver sales upon achievement of commercial production by Minefinders.
(8)TB-GSR1 will remain in effect until cumulative production of 804,420 ounces of gold is achieved or until cumulative payments of $35.0 million have been made to Royal Gold, whichever occurs first. TB-GSR2 will remain in effect until the termination of TB-GSR1. As of June 30, 2009, we have recognized approximately $11.2 million in royalty revenue associated with TB-GSR1, which is attributable to cumulative production of 84,000 ounces of gold.
(9)Royalty is subject to a dollar cap of approximately $12.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $7.9 million remains under the cap.
(10)In May 2009, Golden Star exercised its right of repurchase on the 1.5% NSR royalty for $3.4 million. As such, the royalty ceased providing revenue to the Company effective May 2009. See “Recent Developments — Property Developments” within Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further detail.
Our Development Stage Royalty Interests

We own royalty interests that are currently in development stage. We categorize development stage royalties as theyproperties that are either not yet in production or not yet generating revenue tofor the Company. Please see Item 2, Properties, of this report for further discussion on our principal development stage royalty interests.

The following royalty interests are currently in development stage asbecause they have not yet provided revenue to the Company butCompany. These royalties are associated with a propertyproperties currently in production.

Mine
LocationOperatorRoyalty
MineLocationOperator
(Gold unless otherwise stated)
Marigold(1)

Marigold(1)

 Nevada, USA Goldcorp 2.0% NSR
Troy

Troy(2)

 

Montana, USA

 

Revett Minerals, Inc.

 6.1%

3.0% GSR (silver
(silver and copper)
2.0% GSR (silver and copper)

Peñasquito(sulfide)

Taparko

 Zacatecas, Mexico

Burkina Faso, West Africa

 Goldcorp

High River

 2.0% NSR (gold, silver, lead and zinc)
TaparkoBurkina Faso, West
Africa
High River

2.0% GSR (TB — GSR3)(TB-GSR3); 0.75% milling royalty (TB —MR1)(TB-MR1)

Don Mario (Upper Mineralized
Zone)

Avebury(3)

 Chiquitos Province,
Bolivia

Tasmania, Australia

 Orvana

Minerals and Metals Group

 3.0%

2% NSR (gold, silver and copper)(nickel)

Reedy’s Burnakura(2,3)

Koolanooka

 

Western Austrailia,
Australia, Australia

 ATW Gold Corp.1.5%-2.5% NSR
Koolanooka(3)
Western Austrailia,
Australia

Sinosteel Midwest Corporation Ltd.

 

AUD$0.25 per ton (iron ore)ore fines)

Meekatharra(3) (Yaloginda)

Western Australia, Australia

Mercator Gold PLC

0.45% NSR

Reedy's Burnakura(4)

Western Australia, Australia

Jinka Metals Ltd.

1.5%-2.5% NSR


(1)
Our royalty interest on the Marigold mine covers the majority of six sections of land, containing a number of open pits, but does not cover the current mining in the Basalt/Antler area. Approximately 45% of the current Marigold reserves are covered by this royalty.

(2)
Royalty became effective July 1, 2010.

(3)
Royalty acquired as part of the IRC transaction, as discussed below within Item 7, MD&A, of this report.

(4)
Royalty becomes payable after 300,000 gold ounces have been produced from the property. After an additional 75,000 gold ounces have been produced from the property, the royalty rate increases from a 1.5% NSR to a 2.5% NSR.

(1)Our royalty interest on the Marigold mine covers the majority of six sections of land, containing a number of open pits, but does not cover the current mining in the Basalt/Antler area. Approximately 45% of the current Marigold reserves are covered by this royalty.

5Table of Contents


(2)Royalty becomes payable after 300,000 gold ounces have been produced from the property. After an additional 75,000 gold ounces have been produced from the property, the royalty rate increases to 2.5% NSR. The Company has not yet determined how much production has been achieved to-date.
(3)Royalty acquired as part of the Barrick transaction, as discussed below within Item 7, MD&A, of this report.
The following royalty interests are currently in development stage as theybecause the properties are being developed by their operators but are not yet in production.

Mine
LocationOperatorRoyalty
MineLocationOperator
(Gold unless otherwise stated)
Gold Hill

Soledad Mountain(1)

 Nevada,California, USA Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.3.0% NSR (gold and silver)

Gold Hill(2)

Nevada, USA

Kinross Gold Corporation (50%), Barrick (50%)

 

1.0%-2.0% to 2.0% sliding-scale NSR and 0.9% NSR (MACE claims)

Relief Canyon

 

Nevada, USA

 

Firstgold Incorporated

 

3.0% NSR and 1.0% NSR

Pascua-Lama

Pascua-Lama(2,3)

 

Region III, Chile

 

Barrick

 0.16%-1.08%

0.67% to 4.48% sliding-scale NSR 0.22%and 1.05% fixed rate royalty (copper)

Meekatharra (Paddy’s Flat)(1)

Bundarra(1)

 

Western Australia,
Australia

 Mercator Gold

Terrain Minerals Ltd.

 

1.5% NSR

Meekatharra(2) (Paddy's Flat)

Western Australia, Australia

Mercator Gold

A$10.00 per gold ounce produced and 1.5% NSR

Canadian
Malartic(1)

Tarmoola(1)

 Quebec, Canada

Western Australia, Australia

 Osisko Mining Corporation (“Osisko”)

St. Barbara

 2.0%-3.0% sliding-scale

1.5% NSR

Holt(1,2)

Schaft Creek(1)

 Ontario,

British Columbia, Canada

 

Copper Fox Metals Inc.

3.5% NPI (gold, silver, copper, molybdenum)

Pine Cove

Newfoundland, Canada

New Island Resources Inc. (70%), Anaconda Mining Inc. (30%)

7.5% NPI

Rambler North

Newfoundland, Canada

Rambler Metals and Mining PLC

1.0% NSR

Holt(4)

Ontario, Canada

St Andrew Goldfields Ltd. (“("St Andrew”Andrew")

 

0.00013 x× quarterly average gold price

Pine Cove(1)

Caber(1)

 Newfoundland,

Quebec, Canada

 New Island

Breakwater Resources
(70%), Anaconda Gold
(30%) Ltd.

 7.5% NPI

1.0% NSR (copper, zinc)

Lluvia deOro(3)

Canadian Malartic(5)

 Sonora, Mexico

Quebec, Canada

 

Osisko Mining Corporation ("Osisko")

2.0% to 3.0% sliding-scale NSR

Wolverine(1)

Yukon, Canada

Yukon Zinc Corporation ("Yukon Zinc")

0.00% to 9.45% sliding-scale NSR (gold and silver)

Lluvia deOro(6)

Sonora, Mexico

NWM Mining Corp.

 

4.0% NSR

Tambor(1)

South-Central, Guatemala

Radius Gold Inc.

4.0% NSR


(1)
Royalty acquired as part of the IRC Transaction, as discussed below within Item 7, MD&A, of this report.

(2)
A portion of the royalty was acquired as part of the IRC Transaction, as discussed below within Item 7, MD&A, of this report.

(3)
See "Recent Developments, Business Developments" within Item 7, MD&A, of this report for a further discussion on recent developments at Pascua-Lama.

(4)
See "Recent Developments, Property Developments" within Item 7, MD&A, of this report for a further discussion on recent developments at Holt.

(5)
The royalty is subject to a buy-down right for $1.0 to $1.5 million. If the buy-down right is exercised by Osisko, the sliding-scale NRS would be reduced to range between 1.0% and 1.5%.

(6)
The various parties claiming interest in the mining concessions subject to this royalty have disputed any royalty obligation.

Table of Contents

(1)Royalty acquired as part of the Barrick transaction, as discussed below within Item 7, MD&A, of this report.
(2)In November 2008, the operator made application to a court in Ontario, Canada for a declaration that it is not obligated to the pay the entire royalty payable under the royalty agreement. The operator claims that its predecessor in interest is responsible for payment of some or all of the royalty. In July 2009, the Ontario, Canada court confirmed that the Company is entitled to payment of the royalty from the predecessor in interest. See “Recent Developments — Property Developments” within Item 7, MD&A, of this report.
(3)The various parties claiming interest in the mining concessions subject to this royalty have disputed any royalty obligation.

Our Exploration Stage Royalty Interests

We own royalty interests on over 80130 exploration stage projects on six continents. None of our exploration stage projects contain proven and probable reserves as of December 31, 2008,2009, as determined by the owner or operator.

6

operator of such projects.


Our Operational Information

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

Royal Gold’sGold's royalty revenue and long-lived assets (royalty interests in mineral properties, net) are geographically distributed as shown in the following table. Please refer to Item 2, Properties, for further discussion onof our significantprincipal royalty interests on producing mineral properties.

                        
 Royalty Interests in Royalty Revenue Royalty Interests in
Mineral Property, net
 
 Royalty Revenue Mineral Properties, net Fiscal Year Ended
June 30,
 Fiscal Year Ended
June 30,
 
 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 
United States  56%  79%  97%  13%  18%  25% 40% 56% 79% 5% 13% 18%

Africa(1)

 29% 21% 11% 2% 8% 12%
Mexico  15%  4%  2%  45%  55%  49% 15% 15% 4% 13% 45% 55%

Australia

 5% 2%  6% 6%  
Canada  2%  1%   19%  1%   4% 2% 1% 27% 19% 1%
Africa(1)
  21%  11%   8%  12%  16%
Chile  1%    6%  7%  10% 4% 1%  42% 6% 7%
Other(2)
  5%  5%  1%  9%  7%  

Other

 3% 3% 5% 5% 3% 7%

(1)
Consists of royalties on properties in Burkina Faso and Guinea.
(1)Consists of royalties on properties in Burkina Faso, the Republic of Ghana and the Republic of Guinea.
(2)The “Other” category for “Royalty Revenue” consists of revenue from Argentina, Australia (2009 only), Bolivia (2009 and 2008 only) and Nicaragua (2009 and 2008 only). The “Other” category for “Royalty Interests in Mineral Properties, net” for 2009 and 2008 consists of assets in Australia, Bolivia, Colombia, Honduras and Nicaragua.

Our financial results are primarily tied to the price of gold, silver, copper and other metals, as well as production from our producing stage royalty interests. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, gold, silver and 2007, thecopper price averages and percentage of gold averaged $874, $821 and $638 per ounce, respectively, the price of silver averaged $12.91, $15.40 and $12.74 per ounce, respectively, and the price of copper averaged $2.25, $3.53 and $3.22 per pound, respectively. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, Royal Gold derived 84%, 74% and 71%, respectively, of its total royalty revenue from gold royalties; 3%, 3% and 2%, respectively, of its total royalty revenue was derived from silver royalties; while 11%, 23%. 27%, respectively, of its total royalty revenue was derived from copper royalties, and 2%, 0% and 0%, respectively, of its total revenue was derived from otherrevenues by metal royalties.were as follows:

In each of fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recognized approximately $22.2 million, $27.7 million and $28.2 million, respectively, of our total royalty revenue from the same operator, Barrick, but not from the same mine.
 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2009 June 30, 2008 
Metal
 Average
Price
 Percentage
of Royalty
Revenue
 Average
Price
 Percentage
of Royalty
Revenue
 Average
Price
 Percentage
of Royalty
Revenue
 

Gold ($/ounce)

 $1,089  81%$874  84%$821  74%

Silver ($/ounce)

 $16.85  3%$12.91  3%$15.40  3%

Copper ($/pound)

 $3.03  9%$2.25  11%$3.53  23%

Other

  N/A  7% N/A  2% N/A  0%

Our financial results are discussed in further detail within Part II, Item 7, MD&A, and within our audited consolidated financial statements which are included in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The risks associated with the operations of our royalty interests in various geographic regions are discussed in PartItem 1A, Risk Factors.

Competition

The mining industry in general and the royalty segment in particular are competitive. We compete with other royalty companies, mine operators and financial buyers in efforts to acquire existing royalties and with the lenders and investors providing debt and equity financing to operators of mineral properties in our efforts to create new royalties. Many of our competitors in the lending and mining business are larger than we are and have greater resources and access to capital than we have. Key


Table of Contents


competitive factors in the royalty acquisition and financing business include price, structure and access to capital.

7


Regulation

Like all mining operations, in the United States, the operators of the mines that are subject to our royalties must comply with environmental laws and regulations promulgated by federal, state and local governments including, but not limited to, the National Environmental Policy Act; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act; the Clean Air Act; the Clean Water Act; the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act; and the Toxic Substances Control Act. Mines located on public lands in the United States are subject to the General Mining Law of 1872 and are subject to comprehensive regulation by either the United States Bureau of Land Management (an agency of the United States Department of the Interior) or the United States Forest Service (an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture). The mines also are subject to regulations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”("EPA"), the United States Mine Safety and Health Administration and similar state and local agencies. Operators of mines that are subject to our royalties in other countries are obligated to comply with similar laws and regulations in those jurisdictions. Although we are not responsible as a royalty owner for ensuring compliance with these laws and regulations, failure by the operators of the mines on which we have royalties to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits can result in injunctive action, damages and civil and criminal penalties on the operators which could reduce or eliminate production from the mines and thereby reduce or eliminate the royalties we receive and negatively affect our financial condition.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 5, 1981. Our executive offices are located at 1660 Wynkoop Street, Suite 1000, Denver, Colorado 80202; our telephone number is (303) 573-1660.

Available Information

Royal Gold maintains an internet website at www.royalgold.com. Royal Gold makes available, free of charge, through the Investor Relations section of theits website, its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available from the SEC’sSEC's internet sitewebsite at www.sec.gov which contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically. These reports, proxy statements and other information may also be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference facilities. The charters of Royal Gold’sGold's key committees of the Board of Directors and Royal Gold’sGold's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are also available on the Company’sCompany's website. Any of the foregoing information is available in print to any stockholder who requests it by contacting Royal Gold’sGold's Investor Relations Department at (303) 573-1660.

Company Personnel

We currently have 1720 employees, all of whom are located in Denver, Colorado. Our employees are not subject to a labor contract or a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be good.

Consulting

        We also retain independent contractors to provide consulting services, relating primarily to geologic and geophysical interpretations and also relating to such metallurgical, engineering, and other technical matters as may be deemed useful in the operation of our business, are primarily provided by independent contractors.business.


8


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The market or trading price of our securities could decline due to any of these risks. In addition, please see our note about forward-looking statements included in Part II, Item 7, MD&A, of this report. Please note that additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business and operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

We received significant revenue in fiscal year 2009 from Cortez, and this maturing mine is likely to experience production declines.
Approximately 22%, and 33% of our revenues were derived from Cortez in fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively. We expect that revenue from our royalties at Cortez will continue to be a significant contributor to our revenue in future periods. However, as Cortez and other mines on which we have royalties mature, we can expect overall declines in production over the years unless operators are able to replace reserves that are mined through mine expansion or successful new exploration. There can be no assurance that the operators of Cortez or our other properties will be able to maintain or increase production or replace reserves as they are mined.

We own passive interests in mining properties, and it is difficult or impossible for us to ensure properties are operated in our best interest.

All of our current revenue is derived from royalties on properties operated by third parties. The holder of a royalty interest typically has no authority regarding the development or operation of a mineral property. Therefore, we are not in control of decisions regarding development or operation of any of the properties on which we hold a royalty interest, and we have limited or no legal rights to influence those decisions.

Our strategy of having others operate properties on which we retain a royalty or other passive interest puts us generally at risk tofor the decisions of others regarding all operating matters, including permitting, feasibility analysis, mine design and operation, processing, plant and equipment matters and temporary or permanent suspension of operations, among others. These decisions are likely to be motivated by the best interests of the operator rather than to maximize royalties. Although we attempt to secure contractual rights, such as audit or access rights, when we create new royalties that will permit us to protect our interests, there can be no assurance that such rights will always be available or sufficient, or that our efforts will be successful in achieving timely or favorable results or in affecting the operation of the properties in which we have royalty interests in ways that would be beneficial to our stockholders.

Volatility in gold, silver, copper and other metal prices may have an adverse impact on the value of our royalty interests and reduce our royalty revenues. Certain of our royalty contracts have features that may amplify the negative effects of a drop in commodity prices.

The profitability of our royalty interests is directly related to the market price of gold, silver, copper and other metal prices. The market price of each metal may fluctuate widely and is affected by numerous factors beyond the control of any mining company. These factors include metal supply, industrial and jewelry fabrication and investment demand, expectations with respect to the rate of inflation, the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and other currencies, interest rates, gold sales and loans by central banks, forward sales by metal producers, global or regional political, economic or banking crises and a number of other factors. If the market price of gold, copper or certain other metals should drop, then our royalty revenues could also drop. Our sliding-scale royalties at Cortez, Taparko and other properties amplify this effect.

9


When the gold price falls below a certain mark in a sliding-scale royalty, we receive a lower royalty rate on production. Furthermore, if gold, copper and certain other metal prices drop dramatically, we might not be able to recover our initial investment in royalty interests or properties. In addition, certain royalty agreements, such as that in place for our interest at Robinson, provide that royalty payments to us are subject to subsequent adjustment based on commodity prices at a later date, three to four months in the case of Robinson, which can result in adjustments to our royalty revenue in later periods. Hence, we may experience positive or negative adjustments to recognized royalty revenues based on changes in commodity prices. Moreover, the selection of a royalty investment or of a property for exploration or development, the determination to construct a mine and place it into production, and the dedication of funds necessary to achieve such purposes are decisions that must be made long before the first revenues from production will be received. Price fluctuations between the time that decisions about exploration, development and construction are made and the commencement of production can have a material adverse effect on the economics of a mine and can eliminate or have a material adverse impact on the value of royalty interests.

        Furthermore, if the market price of gold, copper or certain other metals should drop, then our royalty revenues would also drop. Our sliding-scale royalties, such as those at Cortez, Taparko, Mulatos and other properties, amplify this effect. When the gold price falls below a certain mark in a sliding-


The volatility

Table of Contents


scale royalty, we receive a lower royalty rate on production. In addition, certain royalty agreements, such as our royalty agreement for the Robinson mine and the Peñasquito mine are based on the operator's concentrate sales to smelters, which include price adjustments between the operator and the smelter based on commodity prices at a later date, three to four months in the case of Robinson. In such cases, our royalty payments from the operator include a component of these later adjustments, which can result in decreased royalty revenue in later periods if commodity prices have fallen.

        Volatility in gold, silver and copper prices is illustrateddemonstrated by the following table, which sets forth, for the periods indicated (calendar year), theannual high and low prices in U.S. dollarsfor those metals from selected years during the past decade. High and low gold prices per ounce, of gold, based on the London Bullion Market Association P.M. fix.

Gold Price Per Ounce ($)
         
Year High Low
 
2000  312   263 
2001  293   256 
2002  349   278 
2003  416   320 
2004  454   375 
2005  537   411 
2006  725   525 
2007  841   608 
2008  1,011   713 
2009 (through August 14, 2009)  989   810 
The volatilityfix, have ranged from $293 to $256 in 2001, from $537 to $411 in 2005, from $1212 to $810 in 2009, and from $1,261 to $1,058 year to date. High and low silver prices is illustrated by the following table which sets forth, for the periods indicated (calendar year), the high and low prices in U.S. dollars per ounce, of silver, based on the London daily fix.
Silver Price Per Ounce ($)
         
Year High Low
 
2000  5.45   4.57 
2001  4.82   4.07 
2002  5.10   4.24 
2003  5.97   4.37 
2004  8.29   5.50 
2005  9.23   6.39 
2006  14.94   8.83 
2007  15.82   11.67 
2008  20.92   8.88 
2009 (through August 14, 2009)  15.97   10.51 

10


The volatilityBullion Market Association P.M. fix, have ranged from $4.82 to $4.07 in copper prices is illustrated by the following table, which sets forth, for the periods indicated (calendar year), the high2001, from $9.23 to $6.39 in 2005, from $19.18 to $10.51 in 2009, and from $19.64 to $15.14 year to date. High and low cooper prices in U.S. dollars per pound, of copper, based on the London Metal Exchange cash settlement price for copper Grade A.
Copper Price Per Pound ($)
         
Year HighLow
 
2000  0.89   0.76 
2001  0.81   0.62 
2002  0.75   0.67 
2003  1.00   0.72 
2004  1.43   1.10 
2005  2.08   1.44 
2006  3.65   2.15 
2007  3.77   2.37 
2008  4.08   1.26 
2009 (through August 14, 2009)  2.90   1.38 
A, have ranged from $0.81 to $0.62 in 2001, from $2.08 to $1.44 in 2005, from $3.33 to $1.38 in 2009, and from $3.61 to $2.76 year to date.

Our revenues are subject to operational and other risks faced by operators of our mining properties.

Although we are not required to pay capital costs or operating costs, our financial results are indirectly subject to hazards and risks normally associated with developing and operating mining properties both for the properties where we may conduct exploration or indirectly for properties operated by others where we hold royalty interests. These risks include:

insufficient ore reserves;
fluctuations in production costs incurred by operators or third parties that may make mining of ore uneconomical or impact the amount of reserves;
declines in the price of gold and other metals;
mine operating and ore processing facility problems;
economic downturns and operators’ insufficient financing;
significant environmental and other regulatory permitting requirements and restrictions;
challenges by non-mining interests to existing permits and mining rights, and to applications for permits and mining rights;
community unrest and labor disputes;
geological problems;
pit wall or tailings dam failures;
natural catastrophes such as floods or earthquakes; and
the risk of injury to persons, property or the environment.

    insufficient ore reserves;

    fluctuations in production costs incurred by operators or third parties that may make mining of ore uneconomical or impact the amount of reserves;

    declines in the price of gold and other metals;

    mine operating and ore processing facility problems;

    economic downturns and operators' insufficient financing;

    significant environmental and other regulatory permitting requirements and restrictions and any changes thereto;

    challenges by non-mining interests to existing permits and mining rights, and to applications for permits and mining rights;

    community unrest, labor disputes or work stoppages at mines;

    geological problems;

    pit wall or tailings dam failures or any underground stability issues;

    natural catastrophes such as floods or earthquakes;

    the risk of injury to persons, property or the environment; and

    uncertain foreign political and economic environments.

Operating cost increases can have a negative effect on the value of and income from our royalty interests by potentially causing an operator to curtail, delay or close operations at a mine site.


Table of Contents


Acquired royalty interests, particularly on development stage properties, are subject to the risk that they may not produce anticipated royalty revenues.

        The royalty interests we acquire may not produce the anticipated royalty revenues. Royalty interests acquired on development stage properties are particularly sensitive to this risk. The success of our royalty acquisitions is based on our ability to make accurate assumptions regarding the valuation, timing and amount of royalty payments, particularly with respect to acquisitions of royalties on development stage properties. If the operator does not bring the property into production and operate in accordance with feasibility studies, technical or reserve reports or other plans, then acquired royalty interests may not yield sufficient royalty revenues to be profitable. Furthermore, operators of development stage properties must obtain all necessary environmental permits and access to water, power and other raw materials needed for operations in order to begin production, and there can be no assurance operators will be able to do so. Pascua-Lama in Chile, the Canadian Malartic, Holt and Wolverine mining projects in Canada, are among our principal development stage royalty acquisitions to date. The failure of any of these projects to produce anticipated royalty revenues may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on our operators for the calculation of royalty payments, and wepayments. We may not be able to detect errors oramd payment calculations may call for retroactive adjustments.

Our royalty payments are calculated by the operators of the properties on which we have royalties based on their reported production. Each operator’soperator's calculation of our royalty payments is subject to and dependent upon the adequacy and accuracy of its production and accounting functions, and errors may occur from time

11


to time in the calculations made by an operator. For example, the complex nature of mining and ownership of mining interests can result in errors regarding allocation of production, such as those that occurred in connection with our restatement of our consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2008. Certain royalty agreements require the operators to provide us with production and operating information that may, depending on the completeness and accuracy of such information, enable us to detect errors in the calculation of royalty payments that we receive. We do not, however, have the contractual right to receive production information for all of our royalty interests. As a result, our ability to detect royalty payment errors through our royalty monitoring program and its associated internal controls and procedures is limited, and the possibility exists that we will need to make retroactive royalty revenue adjustments. Some of our royalty contracts provide us the right to audit the operational calculations and production data for the associated royalty payments; however, such audits may occur many months following our recognition of the royalty revenue and may require us to adjust our royalty revenue in later periods. In addition, certain royalty agreements, such as our royalty agreement for the Robinson mine, provide that royalty payments to us are subject to subsequent adjustment based on commodity prices at a later date, three to four months in the case of Robinson, which can result in adjustments to our royalty revenue in later periods. Hence, audits of payments with these terms may result in the recognition by us of retroactive changes to previously disclosed royalty revenues.
Our disclosure controls and internal control over our financial reporting are subject to inherent limitations.
Management has concluded that as of the period ended June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting were effective. Such controls and procedures, however, may not be adequate to prevent or identify existing or future internal control weaknesses due to inherent limitations that are beyond our control, including, but not limited to, our dependence on operators for the calculations of royalty payments as discussed in the above risk factor. As an example, we concluded that we had a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, because we were not able to timely detect an operator’s incorrect calculation of a certain royalty payment. As a result, we restated our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 (please see Item 9A of our Form 10-K/A, filed on November 6, 2008, and Item 4 of Part I of our Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2008, for further discussion of the material weakness and restatement). While we believe we have remedied such material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, inherent limitations that are beyond our control remain and there is a risk that material misstatements in results of operations and financial condition may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our internal controls over financial reporting and may require us to restate our financial statements. This could, in turn, adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and there is a risk that repeated restatements could result in an investigation by the SEC.

If the current economic downturn,global financial conditions and challenging credit markets and depressed prices of certain commodities isare prolonged, it may affect the ability of the operators of the properties on which we have royalties to meet liquidity needs or operate profitably, which in turn could have material adverse effects on the value of and revenue from our royalty interests. In addition, the current economic downturnglobal financial conditions may adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for additional royalty acquisitions.

        Current global financial conditions have been subject to increased volatility and uncertainty. The valuedevelopment and operation of mines is very capital intensive, and revenue from our royalty interests may be materially adversely affected if commodity prices for the various metals on which we have royalties or which are the primary production at mines on which we have royalties decline significantly, as occurred with respect to copper during the second half of calendar 2008. For example, the decline in prices for copper negatively impacted our revenue for the three-month period ended December 31, 2008 by approximately $3.3 million, in comparison to our total revenue for such period of approximately $14.6 million. In addition, our royalty interests and revenues may be materially adversely affected if operators of the properties on which we have royalties do not have, in light of prevailing economic conditions, the financial strength or sufficient credit or other financing capability to cover the costs of operatingdeveloping or developingoperating a mine, causing anthe operator tomay curtail, delay or closecease development of or operations at a mine site. Further disruptionMany of our principal royalty interests are on development stage properties that require very significant capital to bring the properties into production and volatility of financial markets could also

12


limit operators’ accessour revenues would be materially adversely affected if operators are unable to thecontinue developing or operating a mine in accordance with their expectations due to insufficient financing needed for operations. For example, High River, the operatoror if any of the Taparko mine, is in breachoperators enter into bankruptcy or liquidation, or undergo


Table of its funding agreement with Royal Gold, and recently announced that its ability to continue as Contents


a going concern depends on, among other things, its ongoing discussions with its lenders and obtaining additional financing. For these or other reasons, it is possible the operators could delay or cease making royalty payments to us.change of control. If any of the operators of the properties on which we have royalties suffer these material adverse effects, enter into bankruptcy or liquidation, or undergo a change of control, then our royalty interests and the value of and revenue from our royalty interests may be materially adversely affected. In addition, a continued economic downturn or credit crisis could adversely affect our abilityif we are unable to obtain debt or equity financing, forour ability to acquire additional assets would be adversely affected.

We received significant revenue from royalties on five properties and adverse developments at those properties, as well as depleting resources, could adversely affect our revenue.

        Approximately 64% of our revenues were derived from our royalty acquisitions.

interests at Taparko, Cortez, Robinson, Leeville and Mulatos in fiscal years 2010 and 2009. We expect that these royalties will continue to be significant contributors to our revenue in future periods. Adverse developments affecting the operation of those properties, including unusual and unexpected geophysical conditions, previously unknown historic underground workings and other matters adversely affecting mining, milling and processing operations, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue from those properties and our results of operations.

        As mines on which we have royalties mature, we can expect overall declines in production over the years unless operators are able to replace reserves that are mined through mine expansion or successful new exploration. There can be no assurance that the operators of Cortez or our other properties will be able to maintain or increase production or replace reserves as they are mined.

Certain of our royalty interests are subject to payment or production caps or rights in favor of the operator or third parties that could reduce the revenues generated from the royalty assets.

        Some royalty interests are subject to limitations, such that the royalty will extinguish after threshold production is achieved or royalty payments at stated thresholds are made. For example, two of our four royalties at Taparko will terminate once we have received an aggregate of $35 million in revenue from TB-GSR1. We expect that the $35 million payment threshold could be achieved during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. When the threshold amount is paid, TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 will expire and be replaced by TB-GSR3, an ongoing 2% GSR, which will significantly reduce our Taparko revenue. We also expect that the payment cap on our royalty at Siguiri could be reached in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, at which time we will no longer receive any royalty from Siguiri. Furthermore, other of our royalty agreements contain rights that favor the operator or third parties. Osisko, the operator of Canadian Malartic, one of our principal development properties, has a buy-down right that, if exercised, would reduce our royalty interest. Also, certain individuals from whom we purchased portions of our royalty interest at Pascua-Lama, another of our principal development properties, are entitled to one-time payments if the price of gold exceeds certain thresholds. If any of these thresholds are met or rights are exercised, our future royalty revenue could be reduced.

We may enter into acquisitions or other material royalty transactions at any time.

We are engaged in a continual review of opportunities to acquire existing royalties, to create new royaltiesroyalty assets or similar interests through the financing of mining projects or to acquire companies that hold royalty assets.royalties. We currently, and generally at any time, have acquisition opportunities in various stages of active review, including, for example, our engagement of consultants and advisors to analyze particular opportunities, analysis of technical, financial and other confidential information, submission of indications of interest, obtaining or providing debt commitments for acquisition financing, participation in preliminary discussions regarding serving as a financing source in connection with royalty acquisitions, and involvement as a bidder in competitive auctions. Any such acquisition could be material to us and could significantly increase the size and scope of our business. In such event, we could issue substantial amounts of common stock or incur substantial additional indebtedness to fund the acquisition.


Table of Contents


Issuances of common stock would dilute the ownership of our existing stockholders and could reduce some or all of our earningsfinancial measures on a per share.

share basis.

In addition, we may consider opportunities to restructure our royalties where we believe such restructuring would provide a long-term benefit to the Company, though such restructuring may reduce near-term revenues. For example, we restructured our royalties at Cortez in connection with the Barrick royalty portfolio acquisition, which reduced our royalty revenue from Cortez during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 by approximately $1.1 million. We could enter into one or more acquisition or restructuring transactions at any time.

We mayhave incurred indebtedness in connection with our royalty acquisitions and could incur substantial additional indebtedness that could have adverse effects on our business.

We

        During the fiscal year 2010, the Company borrowed $255 million under its existing credit facilities. As a result of this indebtedness, we are required to use a portion of our cash flow to service the principal and interest on our debt. This limits the cash flow available to fund acquisitions and dividends and other general corporate purposes. In addition, we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future in connection with financing acquisitions, strategic transactions or for other purposes. If we were to incur substantial additional indebtedness, it may become difficult for us to satisfy our debt obligations, increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions or require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations and proceeds of any equity issuances to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availabilityany of cash flow to fund acquisitions and dividends and other general corporate purposes, which results may place us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors that have less debt or have other adverse effects onupon us.

We may be unable to successfully acquire additional royalty and other similar interests.

Our future success largely depends upon our ability to acquire royalty interests at appropriate valuations, including through corporate acquisitions, to replace depleting reserves and to diversify our royalty portfolio. We anticipate that most of our revenues will be derived from royalty and other similar interests that we acquire or finance, rather than through exploration and development of properties. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify and complete the acquisition of such royalty interests, or businesses that own desired royalty interests, at reasonable prices or on favorable terms. In addition, we face competition in the acquisition of royalty and other similar interests. If we are unable to successfully acquire additional royalties or other similar interests, the reserves subject to our royalties will decline as the producing properties on which we have royalties are mined.mined or payment or production caps on certain of our royalties are met. We may also experience negative reactions from the financial markets or operators of properties on which we seek royalties and other similar interests if we are unable to successfully complete acquisitions of royalty interests or

13


businesses that own desired royalty interests. Each of these factors may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock or our financial condition or results of operations.
Acquired royalty interests, particularly on development stage properties, are subject

        On July 15, 2010, we entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which we agreed to acquire 25% of the riskpayable gold produced from the Mt. Milligan copper-gold project in British Columbia from Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. or its affiliate ("Thompson Creek") concurrent with the closing of Thompson Creek's proposed acquisition of Terrane Metals Corp. ("Terrane"). There can be no assurance that they may not produce anticipated royalty revenues.

The royalty interests we acquire may not produce the anticipated royalty revenues. Royalty interests acquired on development stage properties are particularly sensitive to this risk. The successThompson Creek's proposed acquisition of our royalty acquisitions is based on our ability to make accurate assumptions regarding the valuation, timingTerrane will be successful, and amount of royalty payments, particularly with respect to acquisitions of royalties on development stage properties. If the operator does not bring the property into production and operate in accordance with feasibility studies or other plans, then acquired royalty interests may not yield sufficient royalty revenues to be profitable. Furthermore, operators of development stage properties must obtain all necessary environmental permits and access to water, power and other raw materials needed for operations in order to begin production, andtherefore, there can be no assurance operatorsthat we will be able to do so. The Taparko projectsuccessful in Burkina Faso, which beganacquiring 25% of the payable gold produced from the Mt. Milligan project.

Estimates of production by the Peñasquito and Doloresoperators of mines in Mexico, both ramping upwhich we have royalty interests are subject to change, and actual production Pascua-Lamamay vary materially from such estimates.

        Production estimates are prepared by the operators of mining properties. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in Chile,estimating anticipated production attributable to our royalty interests, including many factors beyond our control and the Canadian Malartic and Holloway-Holt mining projectscontrol of the operators of properties in Canada, are among our principal development stagewhich we


Table of Contents


have royalty acquisitions to date. In addition, the Andacollo Production Interest that we expect to acquire from CDA isinterests. We do not participate in the development stagepreparation or verification of production estimates and willhave not produce royalty revenue unless CDAindependently assessed or verified the accuracy of such information. The estimation of anticipated production is able to complete permittinga subjective process and construction and successfully produce copper, as well as gold by-product, from the sulfide portionsaccuracy of any such estimates is a function of the depositquality of available data, reliability of production history, variability in grade encountered, mechanical or other problems encountered, engineering and geological interpretation and operator judgment. Rates of production may be less than expected. Results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production, changes in commodity prices, and the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to operate the project at full capacity. See “Recent Developments — Proposed Acquisition of Andacollo Production Interest” within Item 7, MD&A, of this report. The failuredate of any of these projectsestimate may cause actual production to produce anticipated royalty revenues mayvary materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

from such estimates.

Estimates of reserves and mineralization by the operators of mines in which we have royalty interests are subject to significant revision.

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating proven and probable reserves and mineralization, including many factors beyond our control and the control of the operators of mineral properties on which we have a royalty interest.interests. Reserve estimates on our royalty interests are prepared by the operators of the mining properties. We do not participate in the preparation or verification of such reports and have not independently assessed or verified the accuracy of such information. The estimation of reserves and of other mineralized material is a subjective process, and the accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production, and the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimate, may cause a revision of such estimates. The volume and grade of reserves recovered and rates of production may be less than anticipated. Assumptions about gold and other precious metal prices are subject to great uncertainty, and such prices have fluctuated widely in the past. Declines in the market price of gold or other precious metals also may render reserves or mineralized material containing relatively lower grades of ore uneconomical to exploit. Changes in operating and capital costs and other factors including short-term operating factors, such as the need for sequential development of ore bodiesgeotechnical characteristics and the processing of new or different ore grades,metallurgical recovery, may materially and adversely affect reserves. Finally, it is important to note that our royalties give us only small percentage interests in only a portion of the production from any reserve,the operators' aggregate reserves, and those percentage interests vary widely based on the individual royalty documents.

EstimatesOur disclosure controls and internal control over our financial reporting are subject to inherent limitations.

        Management has concluded that as of productionthe period ended June 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting were effective. Such controls and procedures, however, may not be adequate to prevent or identify existing or future internal control weaknesses due to inherent limitations that are beyond our control, including, but not limited to, our dependence on operators for the calculations of royalty payments as discussed in the above risk factor. There is a risk that material misstatements in results of operations and financial condition may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our internal controls over financial reporting and may require us to restate our financial statements, as we did in fiscal year 2008. This could, in turn, adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and there is a risk that repeated restatements could result in an investigation by the operators of mines in which we have royaltySEC.

Royalty interests are subject to change,title and actual production may vary materially from such estimates.

Production estimates are preparedother defects and contest by the operators of mining properties. There are numerous uncertainties inherentprojects and holders of mining rights, and these risks may be hard to identify in estimating anticipated production attributable to ouracquisition transactions.

        We sometimes acquire portfolios of royalty interests. For example, we acquired 80 royalty interests including many factors beyond our controlwhen we acquired IRC. While Royal Gold seeks to confirm the existence, validity, enforceability and the controlgeographic extent of the operatorsroyalties it acquires, there can be no assurance that disputes over these and other matters will not arise. Royalty interests in mining projects or properties generally are subject to uncertainties and complexities arising from the application of properties in which we have royalty interests. We do not participatecontract and property laws governing


Table of Contents


private parties and/or local or national governments in the preparation or verification of production estimates and have not independently assessed or verifiedjurisdiction where mining projects are located. For example, the accuracy of such information. The estimation of anticipated production is a

14


subjective process and the accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quality of available data, reliability of production history, variability in grade encountered, mechanical or other problems encountered, engineering and geological interpretation and operator judgment. Rates of production may be less than expected. Results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production, changes in commodity prices, and the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimate may cause actual production to vary materially from such estimates.
If title to properties is not properly maintained by the operators, our royalty revenues could decline.
The validity of unpatented mining claims, which constitute a significant portion of the properties on which we hold royalties in the United States, is often uncertain and such validity is always subject to contest. Unpatented mining claims are generally considered subject to greater title risk than patented mining claims, or real property interests that are held by absolute title to the land (fee simple)(known legally as "fee simple" ownership). Because unpatented mining claimsFurthermore, royalties in many jurisdictions are self-initiated and self-maintained, they possess some unique vulnerabilities not associated with other types of property interests. It is impossible to ascertain the validity of unpatented mining claims from public real property records, and therefore it can be difficult or impossible to confirm that all of the requisite steps have been followed for location and maintenance of an unpatented mining claim. If title to unpatented mining claims subject to our royalty interests has not been properly established or is not properly maintained, our royalty revenues could be adversely affected.
Royalty interests are subject to contest by operators of mining projects and holders of mining rights.
Our business includes the risk that operators of mining projects and holders of mining claims, tenements, concessions, mining licenses or othercontractual in nature, rather than interests in land, and mining rights may contesttherefore are subject to change of control, bankruptcy or insolvency of operators, and to challenges of various kinds brought by operators or third parties. We do not usually have the protection of security interests over property that we could liquidate to recover all or some part of our investment in the royalty. Disputes could also arise challenging, among other things, the existence or geographic extent of ourthe royalty, interests. While Royal Gold seeksthird party claims to confirm the existence, validity and enforceabilitysame royalty asset or to the property on which we have a royalty, various rights of the operator or third parties in or to the royalty, methods for calculating the royalty, production and other thresholds and caps applicable to royalty payments, the obligation of an operator to make royalty payments, and various defects in the royalty agreement itself. Unknown defects in the royalties it acquires, there can be no assurance that such disputes will not arise. As a general matter, royalty interests in mining projects or properties are subject to uncertainties and complexities arisingwe acquire may prevent us from realizing the anticipated benefits from the applicationacquisition, and could materially adversely affect our revenue and results of contractoperations.

Changes in federal and property laws governing private parties and/or local or national governments in the jurisdiction where mining projects are located.

Anticipated federalstate legislation could decrease our royalty revenues.

        A number of the properties on which we have royalties are located on U.S. federal lands that are subject to federal mining and other public land laws. Changes in federal or state laws or the regulations promulgated under them could affect mine development and expansion, significantly increase regulatory obligations and compliance costs with respect to mine development and mine operations, increase the cost of holding mining claims or impose additional taxes on mining operations, all of which could adversely affect our royalty revenue from such properties. In recent years, the United States Congress has considered a number of proposed major revisions to the General Mining Law of 1872 (the “General"General Mining Law”Law"), which governs the creation, maintenance and possession of mining claims and related activities on federal public lands in the United States. ThreeFour such proposals are currently pending. Bills H.R. 699 and S. 140 were introduced in the Congress in January 2009 and S. 796 and H.R. 3201 were introduced in the Congress in January, April and July, 2009, respectively. H.R. 699 would,Provisions in these proposed bills, if enacted, would impose a royaltyroyalties payable to the U.S. Governmentgovernment on existingproduction, increase land holding fees, impose federal reclamation fees, impose additional environmental operating standards and future production of minerals from unpatented mining claims in the United States, render certain federal lands unavailable for the location of unpatented mining claims, afford greater public involvement and regulatory discretion in the mine permitting process, provide for citizen suits against miners operating on federal lands, and impose new and stringent environmental operating standards and mined land reclamation requirements in addition to those already in effect.

If enacted, S. 796 would, among other things, impose a royalty on production of minerals from unpatented mining claims (except that production from permitted operations producing in commercial quantities on the date of enactment would be grandfathered), impose a land use fee on all federal lands included in mining permits, impose an abandoned mine land reclamation fee on all hardrock mining operations, afford greater public involvement and regulatory discretion in the mine permitting process and in determining appropriate financial assurance for completion of reclamation obligations, render certain federal lands unavailable for the location of unpatented mining claims, and impose new mined land reclamation requirements in addition to those already in effect.

15


H.R. 3201 would, if enacted, impose a royalty on production of minerals from unpatented mining claims located after the date of enactment, and impose an abandoned locatable mine land fee on production from unpatented mining claims.
process. If enacted, legislation such as H.R. 699, S. 140, S. 796 and H.R. 3201 could adversely affect the development of new mines and the expansion of existing mines, as well as increase the cost of all mining operations on federal lands, perhaps materially and adversely affecting mine operators and, therefore, our royalty revenue.
The effect of any revision of the General Mining Law on our royalty interests in the United States cannot be determined conclusively until such revision, if any, is enacted and challenges to the legislation, if any, have been finally resolved. In addition, a number of the properties on which we have royalties are located on U.S. federal lands that are subject to federal mining and other public land laws. Changes in such laws or regulations promulgated under such laws could affect mine development and expansion and significantly increase regulatory obligations and compliance costs with respect to mine development and mine operations, which could adversely affect our royalty revenue from such properties. By way of example, if a royalty, assessment, production tax, or other levy imposed on and measured by production is charged to the operator at Cortez, which is largely located on U.S. federal lands, the amount of that charge would be deducted from gross proceeds for calculation of our GSR1, GSR2 and GSR3 royalties, which would reduce our royalty revenues from these royalty interests.

Foreign operations and operation by foreign operators are subject to many risks.

We derived approximately 44%60% of our revenues from foreign sources during fiscal 2009,2010, compared to 21%44% in fiscal 2008.2009. Our principal producing royalties on properties outside of the United States are located in Australia, Burkina Faso, Canada, Mexico and Spain. We currently have interests in mines and projects outside of the United States in Argentina, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Finland, Ghana, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, the Republic of Guinea, Russia, Spain and Russia. We also evaluate precious metal royalty acquisitions or development opportunities in other parts of the world, including Central America, Europe, Republics of the former Soviet Union, Asia, Africa and South America.Tunisia. Our foreign activities are subject to the risks normally associated with conducting business in foreign countries. These risks include, depending on the country, such things as volatile exchange controls and currency fluctuations, inflation, limitations on


Table of Contents


repatriation of earnings, foreign taxation, enforcement of unfamiliar or uncertain foreign real estate, contract and environmental laws, and enforcement, expropriation or nationalization of property, labor practices and disputes, changes in legislation that could substantially increase the cost of mining operations, war, civil unrest and uncertain political and economic environments. There are also risks of warRecently proposed tax legislation in Australia, Chile and civil disturbances, as well as other risksforeign jurisdictions could impose large tax obligations on operators that could cause exploration ormaterially adversely affect the feasibility of new mine development difficulties or stoppagesand the profitability of operations, restrict the movement of funds or result in the deprivation or loss of contract or real property rights or the taking of property by nationalization or expropriation. Exploration licenses granted by some foreign countries do not include the right to mine, and in some jurisdictions the right to convert an exploration license intoexisting mining rights may not be automatic. Each country has discretion in determining whether to grant a license to mine. If an operator cannot secure a mining license following exploration of a property, or were to lose such a license, then the value of our royalty interest would be negatively affected or its validity undermined. Foreign operations also could be adversely impacted by laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade, investment and taxation. Furthermore,operations. In addition, many of our operators are organized outside of the United States. Our royalty interests may be subject to the application of foreign laws to our operators, and their stockholders, including laws relating to foreign ownership structures, corporate transactions, creditors’creditors' rights, bankruptcy and liquidation.

Foreign operations also could be adversely impacted by laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade, investment and taxation.

The mining industry is subject to significant environmental risks.

Mining is subject to potential risks and liabilities associated with pollution of the environment and the disposal of waste products occurring as a result of mineral exploration and production. Laws and regulations in the United States and abroad intended to ensure the protection of the environment are constantly changing and generally are becoming more restrictive and costly. Insurance against environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production) is not generally available to companies

16


within the mining industry, such as the operators of the mines in which we hold a royalty interest, at a reasonable price. Furthermore, mining may be subject to significant environmental and other permitting requirements regarding the use of raw materials, particularly water, needed for operations. If an operator is forced to incur significant costs to comply with environmental regulations or becomes subject to environmental restrictions that limit its ability to continue or expand operations, or if an operator were to lose its right to use or access water or other raw materials necessary to operate a mine, our royalty revenues could be reduced, delayed, or eliminated. These risks are most salient with regard to our development stage royalty properties where permitting may not be complete butand where new legislation and regulation can also lead to delays, interruptions and significant unexpected cost burdens interruptionsfor mine operators. For example, legislation is pending in Argentina which, if enacted, could stop or stoppagecurtail mining activities on or near the country's glaciers. We have royalty interests on the Chilean side of operations at operating mines.the Pascua-Lama Project, which straddles the border between Chile and Argentina, and the new legislation in Argentina, if passed, could affect the feasibility, design, development and operation of the Pascua-Lama Project. Further, to the extent that we become subject to environmental liabilities for the time period during which we were operating properties, the satisfaction of any liabilities would reduce funds otherwise available to us and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Regulations and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in increased operating costs to the operators of the properties on which we have royalties.

        A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to the potential impacts of climate change. The December 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which ends in 2012, established a set of greenhouse gas emission targets for countries that have ratified the Protocol, which include Canada, Ghana, Australia and Peru. Furthermore, the U.S. Congress and several states have initiated legislation regarding climate change that will affect energy prices and demand for carbon intensive products. Additionally, the Australian Government may potentially reintroduce a national emissions trading scheme and mandatory renewable energy targets. Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on the operators of the properties on which we have royalties, including increased energy, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs to comply with such regulations. If an operator of a property on which we have royalty interests is forced to incur significant costs to comply with climate change regulation or becomes subject to environmental restrictions that limit its ability to continue or expand operations, our royalty revenues from that property could be reduced, delayed, or eliminated.


Table of Contents


We depend on the services of our President and Chief Executive Officer and other key employees and on the participation of our Chairman.

We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our key executive management personnel. Currently, Tony Jensen is serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Jensen’sJensen's extensive commercial experience, mine operations background and industry contacts give us an important competitive advantage. Furthermore, our Chairman, Stanley Dempsey, who served as our Executive Chairman until his retirement in January 2009, remains closely involved with us. Mr. Dempsey’sDempsey's knowledge of the royalty business and long-standing relationship with the mining industry are important to our success. The loss of the services of Mr. Jensen or other key employees could jeopardize our ability to maintain our competitive position in the industry. We currently do not have key person life insurance for any of our officers or directors.

Additional risks that Royal Gold may face as a result of the Teck Transaction are set forth below.
The closing of the Teck Transaction is subject to closing conditions, and there can be no assurance the closing conditions will be met.
There is no assurance that the Teck Transaction will be completed. The closing of the Teck Transaction is subject to satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including the condition that the operator, CDA, enter into certain concentrate marketing of its production from the Andacollo project and a condition in both Royal Gold’s and CDA’s favor that CDA’s material governmental approvals are not withdrawn or challenged (or such action threatened). CDA will be precluded from exercising the condition regarding governmental approvals if Royal Gold waives the condition and waives its rights to indemnification from CDA with respect to such governmental approvals. Teck/CDA has recently announced that they have encountered challenges to the previously granted permits for the process water supply, which may result in a delay in the start-up of the sulfide milling operations, and to accommodate the potential delay, Royal Gold has agreed to extend the outside closing date of the Teck Transaction. As such, either party may terminate the definitive agreement if closing conditions are not satisfied or waived by January 29, 2010.
Even if the Teck Transaction is completed, the Andacollo Production Interest may not produce the anticipated royalty revenue.
Even if the Teck Transaction is completed, there can be no assurance that the production interest we acquire on the Andacollo project will produce the anticipated royalty revenue. The success of the Andacollo project depends upon, among other factors, the ability of the operator to complete the construction of the mine and mill facilities for the sulfide portion of the deposit at the project, the ability of the operator to bring the project into production, the price of copper, the availability of resources necessary to construct and operate the project, including adequate water and power supplies and rights of way, and receipt and maintenance of necessary environmental and other permits to operate the project. While we understand that CDA holds the required air, water and other environmental permits, CDA has announced that challenges to previously granted permits for the water supply arrangements may result in delays to project start-up. There can be no assurance that developments in the political, regulatory or social environment will not require CDA to take further action, and incur additional costs, to maintain its permits or obtain other permits in order to complete development or to operate the project. The failure to

17


maintain or obtain such permits could materially and adversely affect the anticipated benefits of the Teck Transaction.
The Andacollo project is a copper mine with gold produced as a by-product. Our production interest, once acquired, will cover only the gold produced from the sulfide portion of the Andacollo project. Consequently, if the price of copper drops, the operator may curtail or delay construction of the sulfide portion or may close operations at the mine site.
If the Teck Transaction is completed, the failure of the Andacollo project to produce anticipated royalty revenues may materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the other benefits we expect to achieve from the Teck Transaction.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our stock price may continue to be volatile and could decline.

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may decline in the future. The high and low sale prices of our common stock were $37.50 and $23.25 inon the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007,NASDAQ Global Select Market were $35.42 and $23.85 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, and $49.81 and $22.75 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.2009 and $55.96 and $37.35 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. The fluctuation of the market price of our common stock has been affected by many factors that are beyond our control, including:

market prices of gold and other metals;
interest rates;
expectations regarding inflation;
ability of operators to produce precious metals and develop new reserves;
currency values;
credit market conditions;
general stock market conditions; and
global and regional political and economic conditions.

    market prices of gold and other metals;

    interest rates;

    expectations regarding inflation;

    ability of operators to produce precious metals and develop new reserves;

    currency values;

    credit market conditions;

    general stock market conditions; and

    global and regional political and economic conditions.

Additional issuances of equity securities by us would dilute the ownership of our existing stockholders and could reduce some or all of our earningsfinancial measures on a per share.share basis, reduce the trading price of our common stock or impede our ability to raise future capital.

We may issue equity in the future in connection with acquisitions, strategic transactions or for other purposes. Any such acquisition could be material to us and could significantly increase the size and scope of our business. To the extent we issue additional equity securities, the ownership of our existing stockholders couldwould be diluted and some or all of our earningsfinancial measures on a per share wouldbasis could be reduced.

If a large number of shares of our common stock is sold in the public market, the sales could reduce the trading price of our common stock and impede our ability to raise future capital.
We cannot predict what effect, if any, future issuances by us of our common stock or of other equity will have on the market price of our common stock. In addition, the shares of common stock that we issue in connection with an acquisition may not be subject to resale restrictions. We may issue substantial additional shares of common stock or other securities in connection with other acquisition transactions. The market price of our common stock could decline if certain large holders of our common stock, or recipients of our common stock in connection with an acquisition, sell all or a significant portion of their shares of common stock or are perceived by the market as intending to sell these shares other than in an orderly manner. In addition, these sales could also impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional common stock in the capital markets.


18


Table of Contents

We may change our practice of paying dividends.

We have paid a cash dividend on our common stock for each fiscal year beginning in fiscal year 2000. Our board of directors has discretion in determining whether to declare a dividend based on a number of factors, including prevailing gold prices, economic market conditions and funding requirements for future opportunities or operations. If our board of directors declines to declare dividends in the future or reduces the current dividend level, then our stock price could fall, and the success of an investment in our common stock would depend solely upon any future stock price appreciation. We have increased our dividends in prior years. There can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to do so. For example, if we were to materially increase our borrowings to conduct a material acquisition, our board of directors could elect to modify our practice of paying dividends and potentially reduce or eliminate dividends on common stock.

Certain anti-takeover provisions could delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us.

Provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation may make it more difficult for third parties to acquire control of us or to remove our management. Some of these provisions:

permit our board of directors to issue preferred stock that has rights senior to the common stock without stockholder approval; and
provide for three classes of directors serving staggered, three-year terms.

    permit our board of directors to issue preferred stock that has rights senior to the common stock without stockholder approval;

    provide for three classes of directors serving staggered, three-year terms; and

    require certain advanced notice of information relating to stockholder nominations and proposals.

We are also subject to the business combination provisions of Delaware law that could delay, deter or prevent a change in control. In addition, we have adopted a stockholder’sstockholder's rights plan that imposes significant penalties upon a person or group that acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common stock without the approval of the board of directors. Any of these measures could prevent a third party from pursuing an acquisition of Royal Gold, even if stockholders believe the acquisition is in their best interests.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

        None.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

We do not own or operate the properties in which we have royalty interests and therefore much of the information disclosed in this Form 10-K regarding these properties is provided to us by the operators. For example, the operators of the various properties provide us information regarding metals production, estimates of mineral reserves and additional mineralized material. Reserves are summarized below in this report in Item 2, Properties, Reserve Information. Our rights to information from the operators under our royalty agreements vary by royalty and by operator and we may not be entitled to information regarding certain properties. We do not participate in the preparation or calculation of the operators’operators' estimates, production reports or reserve calculations and have not independently assessed or verified the accuracy of such information.

There is more information available to the public regarding thecertain properties in which we have royalties, including reports filed with the SEC byor with the operators Barrick, Newmont, Coeur d’Alene, Capital Gold and Goldcorp.Canadian securities regulatory agencies available at www.sec.gov or www.sedar.com, respectively. For risks to our business associated with operations of mining properties by third parties see generally the risks described under Part I, Item 1A, “RiskRisk Factors. For risks associated with the operators’operators' reserve estimates, please see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Risk


Table of Contents


Factors,Estimates of reserves and

19


mineralization by the operators of mines in which we have royalty interests are subject to significant revision, of this report for further detail.

The description of our principal royalties set forth in this Item 2, Properties, includes the location, operator, reserves and our royalty rate and interests. The descriptions do not include material current developments at each property. Material current developments announced by the operators are discussed in Item 7, MD&A, of this report.

Principal Royalties on Producing Properties

Recent activities and further information for each of the principal producing properties in which we have a royalty interest are described in the following pages. The Company considers both historical and future potential revenues in determining which royalties in our portfolio are principal to our business. Estimated future potential royalty revenues from both producing and development properties are based on a number of factors, including reserves subject to our royalty interests, production estimates, feasibility studies, metal price assumptions, mine life, legal status and other factors and assumptions, any of which could change and could cause Royal Gold to conclude that one or more of such royalties are no longer principal to our business. Reserves for all of our producing properties are summarized in this report in Item 2, Properties, Reserve Information. As of June 30, 2010, the Company considers the properties discussed below principal to our business.

Andacollo (Region IV, Chile)

        We own a royalty on all gold produced from the sulfide portion of the Andacollo copper and gold deposit. The Andacollo Royalty equals 75% of the gold produced from the sulfide portion of the deposit at the Andacollo mine until 910,000 payable ounces of gold have been sold, and 50% of the gold produced in excess of 910,000 payable ounces of gold.

        Andacollo is an open-pit copper mine located in central Chile, Region IV in the Coquimbo Province and is operated by a subsidiary of Teck Resources Limited ("Teck"). Andacollo is located in the foothills of the Andes Mountains approximately 1.5 miles southwest of the town of Andacollo. The provincial capital of La Serena and the coastal city of Coquimbo are approximately 34 miles northeast of the Andacollo project by road and Santiago is approximately 215 miles south by air. Access to the mine is provided by taking Route 43 (R-43) south from La Serena to El Peñon. From El Peñon, D-51 is followed east and eventually curving to the south to Andacollo. Both R-43 and D-51 are paved roads.

        As of December 31, 2009, Teck estimated that at a $500 per ounce gold price, proven and probable reserves were 437.2 million tons, at an average grade of 0.004 ounces per ton containing 1.631 million ounces of gold.

        Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion on the Andacollo Royalty.


Table of Contents

        The following aerial photo depicts the area subject to our royalty interest at Andacollo:

Voisey's Bay (Labrador, Canada)

        As a result of the IRC Transaction, we own an effective 2.7% NSR royalty on the Voisey's Bay nickel-copper-cobalt mine located in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada and operated by Vale. The Company owns 90% of a 3.0% NSR (or 2.7%) while a non-controlling interest owns the remainder. The Voisey's Bay project is located on the northeast coast of Labrador, on a peninsula bordered to the north by Anaktalak Bay and to the south by Voisey's Bay. The nearest communities are Nain, approximately 20 miles northeast, and Natuashish, approximately 50 miles southeast. The property is 205 miles north of Happy Valley-Goose Bay, in south-central Labrador, and 560 miles north-northwest of St. John's, the capital of the Province. Access to the property is by helicopter, small aircraft or tracked vehicles during the winter.

        As of December 31, 2009, Vale reported that nickel, copper and cobalt reserves were 27.6 million tons, at an average grade of 2.71% nickel, 1.58% copper and 0.13% cobalt containing 1,493 million pounds of nickel, 873 million pounds of copper and 74 million pounds of cobalt. Reserves were calculated at $11.01 or less per pound of nickel, $2.91 or less per pound of copper, and $22.70 or less per pound of cobalt.

        Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for a further discussion on the IRC Transaction.


Table of Contents

        The following aerial photo depicts the area subject to our royalty interest at Voisey's Bay:

Cortez Pipeline Mining Complex (Nevada, USA)

Cortez is a large open pit;pit, mill and heap leach operation located approximately 60 air miles southwest of Elko, Nevada, in Lander County. The site is reached by driving west from Elko on Interstate 80 approximately 46 miles, and proceeding south on State Highway 306 approximately 23 miles. Cortez includes the Pipeline, South Pipeline, Gap and Crossroads deposits and is operated by subsidiaries of Barrick.

The royalty interests we hold at Cortez include:

    (a)
    Reserve Claims ("GSR1").    This is a sliding-scale GSR royalty for all products from an area originally known as the "Reserve Claims," which includes the majority of the Pipeline and South Pipeline deposits. As defined in our royalty agreement with Cortez, our GSR royalty applies to revenues attributed to products mined and removed, with no deduction for any costs paid by or charged to Cortez, except for deductions for refining and transportation of doré and Mining Law reform costs. Mining Law reform costs include all amounts paid by or charged to Cortez for any royalty, assessment, production tax or other levy imposed on and measured by production, to the extent that any such levy is hereafter imposed by the United States in connection with reform of the General Mining Law or otherwise. As defined, no such Mining Law reform costs are currently deducted since no such reform has occurred. The revenues attributed to Cortez are determined on a deemed market value basis of total production for each calendar quarter outturned to Cortez's account at the refiner. The GSR

(a)Reserve Claims (“GSR1”). This is a sliding-scale GSR royalty for all gold produced from an area originally known as the “Reserve Claims,” which includes the majority of the Pipeline and South Pipeline deposits. As defined in our royalty agreement with Cortez, our GSR royalty applies to revenues attributed to products mined and removed, with no deduction for any costs paid by or charged to Cortez, except for deductions for refining and transportation of doré and Mining Law reform costs. Mining Law reform costs include all amounts paid by or charged to Cortez for any royalty, assessment, production tax or other levy imposed on and measured by production, to the extent that any such levy is hereafter imposed by the United States, in connection with reform of the General Mining Law or otherwise. As defined, no such Mining Law reform costs are currently deducted since no such reform has occurred. The revenues attributed to Cortez are determined on a deemed market value basis of total production for each calendar quarter outturned to Cortez’s account at the refiner. The GSR royalty rate on the Reserve Claims is tied to the gold price as shown in the table below and does not include indexing for inflation or deflation.
(b)GAS Claims (“GSR2”). This is a sliding-scale GSR royalty for all gold produced from an area outside of the Reserve Claims, originally known as the “GAS Claims,” which encompasses approximately 50% of the GAP deposit and all of the Crossroads deposit. The GSR royalty rate on the GAS Claims, as shown in the table below, is tied to the gold price, without indexing for inflation or deflation, and applies to revenues attributed to products mined and removed, with no deduction of costs, except for refining and transportation of doré and Mining Law reform costs, if any. The GSR2 royalty, which was restructured as part of the Barrick acquisition, as discussed in more detail within Item 7, MD&A, of this report, will continue to apply to the mining claims that comprise the Crossroads deposit and approximately 50% of the GAP deposit.

20Table of Contents

      royalty rate on the Reserve Claims is tied to the gold price as shown in the table below and does not include indexing for inflation or deflation.

    (b)
    GAS Claims ("GSR2").    This is a sliding-scale GSR royalty for all products from an area outside of the Reserve Claims, originally known as the "GAS Claims," which encompasses approximately 50% of the GAP deposit and all of the Crossroads deposit. The GSR royalty rate on the GAS Claims, as shown in the table below, is tied to the gold price, without indexing for inflation or deflation, and applies to revenues attributed to products mined and removed, with no deduction of costs, except for refining and transportation of doré and Mining Law reform costs, if any. The GSR2 royalty applies to the mining claims that comprise the Crossroads deposit and approximately 50% of the GAP deposit.

    (c)
    Reserve and GAS Claims Fixed Royalty ("GSR3").    The GSR3 royalty is a fixed rate GSR royalty of 0.7125% and originally covered the same cumulative area as is covered by our two sliding-scale GSR royalties, GSR1 and GSR2. However, our GSR3interest does not cover the mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit.

    (d)
    Net Value Royalty ("NVR1").    This is a fixed 1.25% NVR on production from the GAS Claims located on a portion of Cortez that excludes the Pipeline open pit. The Company owns 31.6% of the 1.25% NVR (or 0.39%) while limited partners (including certain directors of the Company) in the partnership, which is consolidated in our financial statements, own the remaining portion of the 1.25% NVR. This NVR1 royalty is calculated by deducting contract defined processing-related and associated capital costs, but not mining costs, from the revenue received by the operator for production from the area covered by the royalty. Our 0.39% portion of the NVR1 royalty does not cover the mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit.


(c)Reserve and GAS Claims Fixed Royalty (“GSR3”). The GSR3 royalty is a fixed rate GSR royalty of 0.7125% and originally covered the same cumulative area as is covered by our two sliding-scale GSR royalties, GSR1 and GSR2. However, as part of the Barrick acquisition, discussed in more detail within Item 7, MD&A, of this report, our GSR3 interest no longer covers the mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit.
(d)Net Value Royalty (“NVR1”). This is a fixed 1.25% NVR on production from the GAS Claims located on a portion of Cortez that excludes the Pipeline open pit. The Company owns 31.6% of the 1.25% NVR (or 0.39%) while limited partners (including certain directors of the Company) in the partnership that we consolidate own the remaining portion of the 1.25% NVR. This NVR1 royalty is calculated by deducting contract defined processing-related and associated capital costs, but not mining costs, from the revenue received by the operator for production from the area covered by the royalty. As part of the Barrick acquisition, as discussed in more detail within Item 7, MD&A, of this report, our 0.39% portion of the NVR1 royalty no longer covers the mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit.
We also own three other royalties in the Cortez area where there is currently no production and no reserves attributed to these royalty interests.

The following shows the current sliding-scale GSR1 and GSR2 royalty rates under our royalty agreement with Cortez, as restructured as part of the Barrick transaction which is discussed in more detail within Item 7, MD&A, of this report:Cortez:

             
London PM Quarterly Average GSR1 and GSR2
Price of Gold Per Ounce ($U.S.) Royalty Percentage
Below   $210.00   0.40%
$210.00   $229.99   0.50%
$230.00   $249.99   0.75%
$250.00   $269.99   1.30%
$270.00   $309.99   2.25%
$310.00   $329.99   2.60%
$330.00   $349.99   3.00%
$350.00   $369.99   3.40%
$370.00   $389.99   3.75%
$390.00   $409.99   4.00%
$410.00   $429.99   4.25%
$430.00   $449.99   4.50%
$450.00   $469.99   4.75%
$470.00   and above  5.00%
London P.M. Quarterly Average
Price of Gold Per Ounce ($U.S.)
GSR1 and GSR2
Royalty Percentage
Below     $210.000.40%
$210.00 - $229.990.50%
$230.00 - $249.990.75%
$250.00 - $269.991.30%
$270.00 - $309.992.25%
$310.00 - $329.992.60%
$330.00 - $349.993.00%
$350.00 - $369.993.40%
$370.00 - $389.993.75%
$390.00 - $409.994.00%
$410.00 - $429.994.25%
$430.00 - $449.994.50%
$450.00 - $469.994.75%
$470.00 - and above5.00%

Under certain circumstances we would be entitled to delayed production payments (i.e., payments not recoupable by Cortez) of $400,000 per year.

Barrick estimated that at a $725an $825 per ounce gold price, proven and probable reserves related to our royalty interests at Cortez includes 110.9134.2 million tons of ore, at an average grade of 0.0380.039 ounces per ton, containing approximately 4.2615.244 million ounces of gold as of December 31, 2008. In addition, Barrick has reported additional mineralized material2009.


Table of Contents

        Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion of recent developments at Cortez totaling 59.9 million tons, at an average grade of 0.017 ounces of gold per ton.

21

Cortez.


The following illustrationaerial photo depicts the area subject to our royalty interests at Cortez:


Table of Contents

Taparko (Burkina Faso, West Africa)

We own a 15.0% GSR royalty (TB-GSR1) and a sliding-scale GSR royalty (TB-GSR2), ranging from 0% to 10.0% depending on the price of gold, on all gold produced from the Taparko open pit gold mine. The Taparko mine is located in Burkina Faso, West Africa, and is operated by Somita, a subsidiary of High River. The Taparko mine is accessible by paved roads and is approximately 125 miles northeast of Ouagadougou, the capital of Burkina Faso.

TB-GSR1 will remain in effect until cumulative production of 804,420 ounces of gold is achieved or until cumulative payments of $35 million have been made to Royal Gold, whichever is earlier. TB-GSR2 will remain in effect until the termination of TB-GSR1. Production at the Taparko mine commenced during our first fiscal quarter of 2008. As of June 30, 2009,2010, we have recognized royalty revenue associated with the TB-GSR1 royalty totaling $11.2$30.6 million, which is attributable to cumulative production of approximately 84,000202,000 ounces of gold.

Management estimates that, based on Taparko's last three quarters of production and its calendar 2010 production guidance, the $35 million cap associated with TB-GSR1 could be met during the third calendar quarter of 2010.

We also own a perpetual 2.0% GSR royalty (TB-GSR3) on all gold produced from the Taparko mine that applies to production following the termination of TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 royalties. A portion of the TB-GSR3 royalty is associated with existing proven and probable reserves and has been classified as a development stage royalty interest. The remaining portion of the TB-GSR3 royalty, which is not

22


currently associated with proven and probable reserves, is classified as an exploration stage royalty interest.

In addition, we own a 0.75% milling fee royalty (TB-MR1) on all gold processed through the Taparko mine processing facilities that is mined from any area outside of the Taparko mine area, subject to a maximum of 1.1 million tons per year. There currently are no proven and probable reserves associated with TB-MR1, and this royalty is classified as an exploration stage royalty interest.

As of December 31, 2008,2009, High River estimated that at an $800 per ounce gold price, proven and probable reserves include 3.18.0 million tons of ore, at an average grade of 0.085 ounces per ton, containing 0.2620.683 million ounces of gold, which reflects the remaining portion undergold. Management estimates that as of December 31, 2009, 0.132 million contained ounces will be depleted to reach the $35 million cap ason TB-GSR1 royalty. Upon meeting the $35 million cap, the remaining 0.551 million contained ounces of December 31, 2008, onestimated gold will be associated with the TB-GSR1 royalty.

TB-GSR3 royalty once it becomes effective.

Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion onof recent developments at Taparko.


Table of Contents

The following mapaerial photo depicts the area subject to our royalty interests at the Taparko mine:


Table of Contents

Robinson Mine (Nevada, USA)

We own a 3.0% NSR royalty on all mineral production from the Robinson open pit mine operated by a subsidiary of Quadra. The Robinson mine produces two flotation concentrates for sale to third party smelters. One concentrate contains copper, gold and silver. The second is a molybdenum concentrate. Access to the property is via Nevada State Highway 50, 6.5 miles west of Ely, Nevada, in White Pine County.

23


As of December 31, 2008,2009, Quadra informed us that the copper and gold reserves were 134.1113.6 million tons, at an average grade of 0.0070.006 ounces per ton of gold, containing 0.9050.704 million ounces of gold and a copper grade of 0.54%0.53% containing 1,4551,203 million pounds of copper. The reserves were calculated at $2.00 per pound of copper and $800 per ounce of gold. Silver and molybdenum reserves were not reported but are produced and sold as by-products. In addition, Quadra reports additional mineralized material totaling 719.7 million tons at an average grade of 0.004 ounces per ton of gold and a copper grade of 0.41% inclusive of proven and probable reserves.

Please refer to “Recent Developments, Property Developments” within Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion onof recent developments at Robinson.

All of

        The following aerial photo depicts the ground within the “permit boundary,” as labeled in the following map, isarea subject to our royalty interest at the Robinson mine:


Table of Contents

Leeville (Nevada, USA)

We own a carried working interest, equal to a 1.8% NSR royalty, which covers the majority of the Leeville property, in Eureka County, Nevada. The Leeville propertyMining Complex is approximately 19 air miles northwest of Carlin, Nevada, and is operated by a subsidiary of Newmont. The property is accessed by driving north from Carlin on Nevada State Highway 766 for 19 miles and then on an improved gravel road for two miles.

At the Leeville, Mining Complex, proven and probable reserves, at a $725an $800 per ounce gold price, include 7.75.3 million tons of ore, at an average grade of 0.3280.338 ounces per ton, containing 2.5181.790 million ounces of gold as of

24


December 31, 2008. In addition, Newmont has reported additional mineralized material totaling 0.8 million tons, at an average grade of 0.392 ounces of gold per ton, at Leeville as of December 31, 2008.
2009.

The following mapaerial photo depicts the area subject to our royalty interest at Leeville:


Table of Contents

Mulatos (Sonora, Mexico)

As

        We own a result of the Barrick transaction, which is discussed further within Item 7, MD&A, of this report, our1.0% to 5.0% sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Mulatos open pit mine in southeastern Sonora, Mexico, increased to 1.0% to 5.0% from 0.30% to 1.5%.Mexico. The Mulatos mine is located approximately 137 miles east of the city of Hermosillo and 186 miles south of the border with the United States and is operated by Alamos. Access to the mine from the city of Hermosillo can be made via private chartered flight or paved and gravel road.

The Mulatos royalty is capped at 2.0 million gold ounces of production. As of June 30, 2009,2010, approximately 416,000581,000 cumulative ounces of gold have been produced.

As of December 31, 2008,2009, based upon a gold price of $700$800 per ounce, Alamos has reported proven and probable reserves of 52.567.9 million tons, at an average grade of 0.0390.035 ounces per ton, containing 2.0462.387 million ounces of gold. Additional mineralized material is reported as 58.0 million tons

        Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of orethis report for further discussion of recent developments at 0.029 ounces per ton as of December 31, 2008.

25

Mulatos.


All of the ground within the shaded area on the following map depicts the area subject to our royalty interests at the Mulatos mine:
Goldstrike (Nevada, USA)
We own a 0.9% NSR royalty on the Goldstrike property located in Eureka County, Nevada, and operated by a subsidiary of Barrick. Specifically, our royalty is on the SJ Claims that cover a portion of the Betze-Post open pit mine. The Goldstrike property lies approximately 24 air miles northwest of Carlin, Nevada. The property is accessed by driving north from Carlin on Nevada State Highway 766 for 19 miles and then on an improved gravel road for five miles.
Barrick estimated that at a $725 gold price, proven and probable reserves related to our royalty interest at Goldstrike include 47.8 million tons of ore, at an average grade of 0.121 ounces per ton, containing approximately 5.768 million ounces of gold as of December 31, 2008. In addition, Barrick reported mineralized material of 3.7 million tons, at a grade of 0.056 ounces per ton, as of December 31, 2008.

26


Contents


The following map depicts the location of the Siguiri mine:
Peñasquito Project (Zacatecas, Mexico)

We own a production payment equivalent to a 2.0% NSR royalty on all metal production from the Peñasquito project, located in the State of Zacatecas, Mexico, and operated by Goldcorp. The Peñasquito project is located approximately 17 miles west of the town of Concepción del Oro, Zacatecas, Mexico. The project, composed of two main deposits called Peñasco and Chile Colorado, hosts large silver, gold, zinc and lead reserves. The deposits contain both oxide and sulfide material. Access to the site is via either paved or cobbled roads west out of Concepcion del Oro nine miles to the town of Mazapil and then further approximately seven miles west offrom Mazapil.

Goldcorp estimates that at a gold price of $725$825 per ounce and a silver price of $12$13 per ounce, proven and probable oxide reserves as of December 31, 2008 will2009 total 201.179.9 million tons of oxide ore, at an average gold grade of 0.0040.005 ounces per ton, containing 0.8000.400 million ounces of gold, and at an average silver grade of 0.360.43 ounces per ton containing 72.134.5 million ounces of silver. Estimates for the sulfide reserves use the same gold and silver prices as the oxide reserve and include lead and zinc reserve estimates at a reserve price of $0.50$0.60 per pound for lead and $0.80 per pound for zinc. Proven and probable sulfide reserves as of December 31, 20082009 include 1,112.21,261.9 million tons of sulfide ore, at an average gold grade of 0.0150.014 ounces per ton, a silver grade of 0.880.82 ounces per ton, a lead grade of 0.32%0.29% and a zinc grade of 0.69%

28


0.63% yielding contained metal of 16.63017.420 million ounces of gold, 973.61,035.6 million ounces of silver, 7,0707,211 million pounds of lead and 15,36415,930 million pounds of zinc. The carrying value of the sulfide portion is classified as development stage of the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009.
In addition, Goldcorp reported as of December 31, 2008 oxide mineralized material, at an $850 gold price and $14 per ounce silver price, totaled 39.9 million tons of oxide ore at an average grade of 0.002 ounces per ton gold and 0.143 ounces per ton silver while sulfide mineralized material, for the same period using the same gold and silver prices as the oxide material along with a lead price of $0.60 per pound and a zinc price of $1.00 per pound, totals 677.9 million tons of sulfide ore at an average grade of 0.007 ounces per ton gold, 0.54 ounces per ton silver, 0.19% lead and 0.55% zinc.

Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion onof recent developments at Peñasquito.

29


The following illustrationaerial photo depicts the locationarea subject to our royalty interest at Peñasquito:


Table of the Peñasquito project:

Contents

Dolores (Chihuahua, Mexico)

We own a 1.25% NSR royalty on gold and a 2.0% NSR royalty on both gold and silver from the Dolores project located in Chihuahua, Mexico, and operated by Minefinders. The Dolores project is located approximately 155 miles west of the city of Chihuahua, Mexico. The property can be accessed by approximately 56 miles of recently upgraded access road from Yepachi, Chihuahua, to the mine site. Access to the property can also be achieved by light aircraft landing on a dirt strip located about five miles from the mine site.

As of December 31, 2008, based upon a gold and silver price of $600 and $10 per ounce, respectively, Minefinders has reported proven and probable gold reserves of 109.5 million tons, at an average gold grade of 0.022 ounces per ton, and an average silver grade of 1.16 ounces per ton, containing 2.444 million ounces of gold. Additional mineralized material is reported as 7.7 million tons at 0.090 ounces of gold per ton. Based upon an average silver price of $10 per ounce, Minefinders reported

30


proven and probable silver reserves of 109.5 million tons, at an average grade of 1.16 ounces per ton, containing 126.6 million ounces of silver. Additional mineralized material is reported as 7.7 million tons at 2.868 ounces of silver per tonThe Company did not receive updated reserve information as of December 31, 2008.
2009 from the operator.

Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion onof recent developments at Dolores.

The following map depicts the area subject to our royalty interests at DoloresDolores:

:


Table of Contents

Las Cruces (Andalucía, Spain)

        As a result of the IRC Transaction, we own a 1.5% NSR royalty on the Las Cruces copper project located in Andalucía, Spain and operated by Inmet. The Las Cruces mine is located in the Sevilla Province of southern Spain, about 12 miles northwest of the Province capital city of Seville. Access to the site is by well-maintained paved roads.

        As of December 31, 2009, Inmet reported copper reserves of 18.2 million tons, at an average grade of 6.3% copper, containing 2,304 million pounds of copper. Reserves were calculated at $2.00 per pound of copper.

        Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for a further discussion of the IRC Transaction.

        The following aerial photo depicts the area subject to our royalty interest at Las Cruces:

Gwalia Deeps (Western Australia, Australia)

        As a result of the IRC Transaction, we own a 1.5% NSR royalty on gold produced from the Gwalia Deeps mine located near the town of Leonora, Western Australia and operated by St. Barbara. The Gwalia Deeps mine in an underground mine within St. Barbara's Leonora operations. The mine can be accessed by taking the Goldfields Highway north out of Kalgoorlie for approximately 245 miles to the town of Leonora.

        As of June 30, 2009, St. Barbara Limited reported gold reserves of 8.7 million tons, at an average grade of 0.227 ounces per ton, containing 1.980 million ounces of gold. Reserves were calculated at


Table of Contents


A$1,250 (Australian dollars) for the operator's fiscal 2010 and at A$850 (Australian dollars) per ounce of gold thereafter.

        Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for a further discussion on the IRC Transaction.

        The following aerial photo depicts the area subject to our royalty interest at Gwalia Deeps:


Table of Contents

Principal Royalties on Development Stage Properties

The following is a description of our principal royalty interests on development stage properties. There are proven and probable reserves associated with these properties as indicated below. These development stage royalty interests are not currently in production. Reserves for all of our development stage properties are summarized below in this report in Item 2, Properties — Properties—Reserve Information.

31


Pascua-Lama Project (Region III, Chile)
We

        As of June 30, 2010, we own a 0.16%0.67% to 1.08%4.48% sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Pascua-Lama project located on both sides of the border between Argentina and Chile, and operated by Barrick. The Pascua-Lama project is located within 7 miles of Barrick’s Veladero project. Access to the project is from the city of Vallenar, III Region, Chile, via secondary roads C-485 to Alto del Carmen, Chile, and C-489 from Alto del Carmen, Chile, to El Corral, Chile.

The sliding-scale NSR royalty is based upon the gold prices as shown in the following table.
             
London PM Monthly Average NSR
Price of Gold Per Ounce ($U.S.) Royalty Percentage
Below   $325.00   0.16%
$325.01   $350.00   0.22%
$350.01   $375.00   0.27%
$375.01   $400.00   0.32%
$400.01   $500.00   0.56%
$500.01   $600.00   0.73%
$600.01   $800.00   0.91%
$800.01   and above  1.08%
When the average quarterly gold price is between any two price ranges above, the royalty rate is proportional to the change in gold price.
Our royalty interest is applicable to all gold production from the portion of the Pascua-Lama project lying on the Chilean side of the border. As discussed in further detail in Item 7, MD&A, under "Recent Developments, Business Developments," on July 1, 2010, the Company entered into two separate assignment of rights agreements with two private Chilean citizens whereby Royal Gold acquired (i) a 0.35% sliding-scale NSR royalty and (ii) the right to acquire an additional 0.40% sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Pascua-Lama project. Upon the closing of the 0.40% sliding-scale NSR royalty acquisition, which is expected to occur during the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company's sliding-scale NSR on the Pascua-Lama project will be 0.78% to 5.23%. The Company ownshas certain contingent rights and obligation with respect to the portion of the Pascua-Lama royalty acquired in the IRC Transaction. Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, under "Recent Developments, Business Developments" for further discussion on the contingent rights and obligations.

        The Pascua-Lama project is located within 7 miles of Barrick's operating Veladero mine. Access to the project is from the city of Vallenar, Region III, Chile, via secondary roads C-485 to Alto del Carmen, Chile, and C-489 from Alto del Carmen to El Corral, Chile.

        As of June 30, 2010, the sliding-scale NSR royalty is based upon the gold prices as shown in the following table.

London Bullion Market Association P.M. Monthly Average Price of Gold per Ounce (US$)
 NSR Royalty Percentage 

less than $325

  0.67%
 

$400

  1.34%
 

$500

  2.33%
 

$600

  3.05%
 

$700

  3.76%

$800 or greater

  4.48%

Note: Royalty rate is interpolated between the upper and lower endpoints.


Table of Contents

        Upon completion of the acquisition of the additional royalty interest, the sliding-scale NSR royalty is based upon the gold prices as shown in the following table:

London Bullion Market Association P.M. Monthly Average Price of Gold per Ounce (US$)
 NSR Royalty Percentage 

less than $325

  0.78%
 

$400

  1.57%
 

$500

  2.72%
 

$600

  3.56%
 

$700

  4.39%

$800 or greater

  5.23%

Note: Royalty rate is interpolated between the upper and lower endpoints.

        The Company will own an additional royalty equivalent to 0.216%1.05% upon completion of acquisition of the additional royalty interest of proceeds from copper produced from the Chilean portion of the project, net of allowable deductions, sold on or after January 1, 2017.

        The Pascua-Lama project is currently under construction. Barrick has estimated commissioning in late calendar 2012 and production in early calendar 2013.

As of December 31, 2008, Barrick estimated that at a $725 gold price, proven and probable reserves includeat a $750 per ounce gold price, totaled 324.7 million tons, at an average of 0.045 ounces per ton, containing 14.615 million ounces of gold. Additional mineralized material is reported as 78.9 million tons at 0.037 ounces of gold per ton, as of December 31, 2008.

Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion on recent developments at Pascua-Lama.

our Pascua-Lama interest.

Canadian Malartic (Quebec, Canada)

As part of the Barrick acquisition, as discussed within Item 7, MD&A, of this report, we

        We own a 2.0%-3.0% to 3.0% sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Canadian Malartic gold project located in Quebec, Canada, and owned by Osisko. The Canadian Malartic gold property is located in the Abitibi Gold Belt in Quebec, Canada, immediately south of the town of Malartic, Quebec, approximately 1216 miles west of the town of Val d’Or.d'Or. The northern extents of the Canadian Malartic property can be accessed directly from the Trans Canadian Highway 117. A paved road running north-south from the town

        As of Malartic towards Lake Mourier cuts through the central area of the Canadian Malartic property.

December 31, 2008, Osisko announced the completion of a positive feasibility study resulting in proven and probable reserves at a $775 gold price of 202.0150.6 million tons of ore, at a grade of 0.031 ounces per ton, and containing 6.284.727 million ounces of gold of which 4.7 million ouncesthat are subject to our royalty interest. Osisko estimated that gold production over the life of the mine will be approximately 591,000 ounces annually.

        The royalty is subject to a buy-down right for $1.0 to $1.5 million. If the buy down right is exercised by

32


Osisko, the sliding-scale NSR royalty would be reduced to a range between 1.0% and 1.5%. There is no expiration date on the buy down right.
Holt (Ontario, Canada)
As part of the Barrick acquisition, as discussed within

        Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report wefor further discussion on recent developments at Canadian Malartic.

Holt (Ontario, Canada)

        We own a sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Holt portion of the Holloway-Holt mining project located in Ontario, Canada and owned 100% by St Andrew. The Holloway-Holt project straddles Ontario Provincial Highway 101 for approximately 25 miles beginning east of Matheson, Ontario, Canada and extending to the Quebec, Canada border. The sliding-scale NSR royalty rate on gold produced from the Holt portion of the mining project is calculated by multiplying 0.00013 by the quarterly average gold price. For example, at a quarterly average gold price of $950 per ounce, the effective royalty rate payable would be 12.35%. The operator has disputed its obligation in respect of


Table of Contents


the royalty is limited to only a portion of the total royalty payable. Please refer to Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for more information regarding the dispute.

St Andrew is currently redevelopinghas brought the Holloway mine under a staged investment planback into production and has announced that it expectsis performing the necessary work to begin production atmaintain the Holt mine in a condition that allows for an easy start-up of mining activities once the second half of calendar year 2010.Holt royalty litigation is satisfactorily resolved. According to St Andrew’sAndrew's public filings in Canada from June 2008, at a gold price of $775 per ounce, proven and probable reserves subject to Royal Gold’sGold's royalty equal 3.0 million tons at a grade of 0.165 ounces per ton, containing 0.486 million ounces of gold.

Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion on recent developments on our Holt royalty.

Wolverine (Yukon, Canada)

        As a result of the IRC Transaction, we own a 0.00% to 9.445% sliding-scale NSR royalty on all gold and silver produced from the Wolverine project located in Yukon Territory, Canada, and operated by Yukon Zinc. The Wolverine property is located 106 miles north-northwest of Watson Lake in south central Yukon. Access to the property is provided by a 17 mile gravel road heading south and then northeast to the Robert Campbell Highway at a point approximately 120 miles north of Watson Lake.

        The sliding-scale NSR royalty on all gold and silver is based on the silver price as show in the following table:

London Bullion Market Association P.M. Monthly Average Price of Silver per Ounce (US$)
NSR Royalty Percentage

less than $5.00

0%

$5.00—$7.50

3.778%

$7.51 or greater

9.445%

33        As of October, 2007, Yukon Zinc reported reserves of 5.3 million tons, at an average grade of 0.039 ounces per ton gold and 8.13 ounces per ton silver, containing 0.205 thousand ounces of gold and 42.8 million ounces of silver. Reserves were calculated using an $80 per tonne NSR cut-off.


Table of Contents


Reserve Information

Table 1 below summarizes proven and probable reserves for gold, silver, copper, zinc and lead that have been reported to us by the operators of our royalty interests as of December 31, 2008.2009. Properties are currently in production unless noted as development (“DEV”("DEV") within the table. Properties for which we did not receive certain reserve breakdowns or information are noted as “DNR”"DNR" within the table. Please refer to pages 39–4139-41 for the footnotes to Table 1.

TABLE 1

Proven and Probable Gold Reserves(1)(2)(3)
As of December 31, 2009(4)

 
 
 
 
 
GOLD(5) 
 
  
 PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES PROVEN AND PROBABLE
RESERVES
 
PROPERTY
 OPERATOR Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Gold
Grade
(oz/ton)
 Gold
Contained
Ozs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Gold
Grade
(oz/ton)
 Gold
Contained
Ozs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Gold
Grade
(oz/ton)
 Gold
Contained
Ozs
(millions)(6)
 
Bald Mountain(7) Barrick  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  65.04  0.025  1.614 
Cortez (Pipeline) GSR1 Barrick  5.18  0.090  0.469  22.96  0.046  1.058  28.14  0.054  1.527(8)
Cortez (Pipeline) GSR2 Barrick  10.56  0.040  0.423  95.53  0.034  3.294  106.08  0.035  3.717(8)
Cortez (Pipeline) GSR3 Barrick  7.87  0.068  0.532  50.32  0.032  1.610  58.19  0.037  2.142(8)
Cortez (Pipeline) NVR1 Barrick  5.99  0.049  0.293  50.03  0.032  1.579  56.02  0.033  1.872(8)
Gold Hill (DEV) Kinross/Barrick  0.28  0.013  0.004  31.08  0.015  0.459  31.37  0.015  0.463 
Goldstrike—SJ Claims(7) Barrick  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  47.20  0.113  5.354 
Leeville Newmont  3.00  0.360  1.078  2.31  0.309  0.712  5.30  0.338  1.790 
Marigold (DEV)(7)(9) Goldcorp/Barrick  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  45.57  0.015  0.681 
Robinson Quadra FNX  108.66  0.006  0.678  4.94  0.005  0.026  113.60  0.006  0.704 
Soledad Mountain (DEV) Golden Queen  30.48  0.024  0.729  20.75  0.016  0.324  51.22  0.021  1.052 
Twin Creeks—Section 13 Newmont  0.47  0.107  0.051  0.16  0.102  0.016  0.63  0.106  0.067 
Wharf Goldcorp  8.70  0.020  0.170  0.97  0.021  0.020  9.68  0.020  0.190 
Canadian Malartic (DEV)(7) Osisko Mining  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  150.56  0.031  4.727 
Holt (DEV)(10) St Andrew Goldfields  0.11  0.187  0.021  2.84  0.164  0.466  2.95  0.165  0.486 
Pine Cove (DEV) New Island Resources/Anaconda Mining  0.00  0.000  0.000  2.57  0.081  0.207  2.57  0.081  0.207 
Schaft Creek (DEV) Copper Fox  453.16  0.007  3.119  451.83  0.005  2.451  904.99  0.006  5.570 
Williams Barrick  9.06  0.068  0.614  2.93  0.084  0.247  11.99  0.072  0.861 
Wolverine (DEV) Yukon Zinc  0.64  0.036  0.023  4.63  0.039  0.182  5.27  0.039  0.205 
Dolores(7) Minefinders  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  109.46  0.022  2.444 
El Chanate Capital Gold  24.69  0.020  0.503  53.08  0.019  1.001  77.77  0.019  1.504 
Mulatos Alamos  11.38  0.047  0.540  56.47  0.033  1.847  67.86  0.035  2.387 
Peñasquito Oxide(11) Goldcorp  79.92  0.005  0.400  0.00  0.000  0.000  79.92  0.005  0.400 
Peñasquito Sulfide(11) Goldcorp  639.97  0.018  11.490  621.91  0.010  5.930  1261.87  0.014  17.420 
Andacollo (DEV) Teck  173.28  0.004  0.708  263.89  0.003  0.924  437.17  0.004  1.631 
El Limon(7) B2Gold  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  1.12  0.134  0.150 
El Toqui Breakwater  0.89  0.128  0.114  2.77  0.067  0.186  3.66  0.082  0.300 
Martha Coeur d'Alene  0.00  0.000  0.000  0.04  0.037  0.001  0.04  0.037  0.001 
Pascua-Lama (DEV)(12) Barrick  36.10  0.053  1.917  288.60  0.044  12.698  324.70  0.045  14.615(13)
Balcooma(14) Kagara Ltd.  0.10  0.020  0.002  1.06  0.006  0.006  1.16  0.007  0.008 
Gwalia St. Barbara  0.00  0.000  0.000  8.71  0.227  1.980  8.71  0.227  1.980 
Meekatharra (Paddy's Flat) Mercator Gold  0.00  0.000  0.000  2.19  0.140  0.308  2.19  0.140  0.308 
Meekatharra (Yaloginda) Mercator Gold  0.00  0.000  0.000  2.79  0.070  0.196  2.79  0.070  0.196 
South Laverton Saracen  0.00  0.000  0.000  16.74  0.048  0.800  16.74  0.048  0.800 
Southern Cross St. Barbara  0.87  0.094  0.082  5.77  0.088  0.509  6.64  0.089  0.591 
Inata Avocet  4.93  0.067  0.329  12.07  0.051  0.615  17.00  0.056  0.944 
Siguiri AngloGold Ashanti  33.98  0.019  0.630  96.84  0.025  2.440  130.82  0.023  3.070 
Taparko TB-GSR-1 and TB-GSR-2(15)(16) High River  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  1.56  0.085  0.132(17)(18)
Taparko TB-GSR3 High River  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  6.40  0.085  0.551(18)

Table of Contents

Proven and Probable Silver Reserves(1)(2)(3)
As of December 31, 2009(4)

 
 
 
 
 
SILVER(19) 
 
  
 PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES PROVEN AND PROBABLE
RESERVES
 
PROPERTY
 OPERATOR Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Silver
Grade
(oz/ton)
 Silver
Contained
Ozs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Silver
Grade
(oz/ton)
 Silver
Contained
Ozs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Silver
Grade
(oz/ton)
 Silver
Contained
Ozs
(millions)(6)
 
Soledad Mountain (DEV) Golden Queen  30.48  0.40  12.283  20.75  0.34  7.076  51.22  0.38  19.359 
Troy Revett  3.08  1.41  4.337  6.01  1.13  6.805  9.10  1.22  11.142 
Schaft Creek (DEV) Copper Fox  453.16  0.05  22.760  451.83  0.05  23.695  904.99  0.05  46.454 
Wolverine (DEV) Yukon Zinc  0.64  7.06  4.534  4.63  8.28  38.286  5.27  8.13  42.820 
Dolores(7) Minefinders  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  109.46  1.16  126.645 
Peñasquito Oxide Goldcorp  79.92  0.43  34.500  0.00  0.00  0.000  79.92  0.43  34.500 
Peñasquito Sulfide Goldcorp  639.97  0.97  618.020  621.91  0.67  417.580  1261.87  0.82  1035.600 
El Toqui Breakwater  0.89  0.23  0.208  2.77  0.26  0.728  3.66  0.26  0.936 
Martha Coeur d'Alene  0.00  0.00  0.000  0.04  33.14  1.249  0.04  32.87  1.249 
Balcooma(14) Kagara Ltd.  0.10  2.22  0.225  1.06  0.35  0.373  1.16  0.51  0.598 

Proven and Probable Base Metal and Other Reserves(1)(2)(3)
As of December 31, 2009(4)


 
 
 
 
 
COPPER(20) 
 
  
 PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES PROVEN AND PROBABLE
RESERVES
 
PROPERTY
 OPERATOR Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Copper
Grade
(% Cu)
 Copper
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Copper
Grade
(% Cu)
 Copper
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Copper
Grade
(% Cu)
 Copper
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 
Johnson Camp Nord Resources  54.98  0.34  372  18.41  0.33  120  73.39  0.34  492 
Robinson Quadra FNX  108.66  0.53  1,161  4.94  0.42  41  113.60  0.53  1,203 
Troy Revett  3.08  0.72  45  6.01  0.49  59  9.10  0.57  104 
Caber (DEV) Breakwater  0.00  0.00  0  0.65  0.84  11  0.65  0.84  11 
Schaft Creek (DEV) Copper Fox  453.16  0.32  2,864  451.83  0.28  2,557  904.99  0.30  5,421 
Voisey's Bay Vale  24.03  1.76  846  3.53  0.38  27  27.56  1.58  873 
Balcooma(14) Kagara Ltd.  0.10  1.10  2  1.06  3.60  76  1.16  3.38  79 
Las Cruces Inmet  8.96  7.40  1,325  9.26  5.30  979  18.22  6.30  2,304 

LEAD(21)

 
 
  
 PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES PROVEN AND PROBABLE
RESERVES
 
PROPERTY
 OPERATOR Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Lead
Grade
(% Pb)
 Lead
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Lead
Grade
(% Pb)
 Lead
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Lead
Grade
(% Pb)
 Lead
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 
Peñasquito Sulfide Goldcorp  639.97  0.35  4,450  621.91  0.22  2,761  1261.87  0.29  7,211 
El Toqui Breakwater  0.89  0.30  5  2.77  0.30  17  3.66  0.30  22 
Balcooma(14) Kagara Ltd.  0.10  3.90  8  1.06  0.01  0  1.16  0.35  8 

ZINC(22)

 
 
  
 PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES PROVEN AND PROBABLE
RESERVES
 
PROPERTY
 OPERATOR Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Zinc
Grade
(% Zn)
 Zinc
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Zinc
Grade
(% Zn)
 Zinc
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Zinc
Grade
(% Zn)
 Zinc
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 
Caber (DEV) Breakwater  0.00  0.00  0  0.65  8.58  111  0.65  8.58  111 
Penasquito Sulfide Goldcorp  639.97  0.75  9,649  621.91  0.50  6,281  1261.87  0.63  15,930 
El Toqui Breakwater  0.89  6.50  116  2.77  7.20  400  3.66  7.03  515 
Balcooma(14) Kagara Ltd.  0.10  9.60  19  1.06  0.02  0  1.16  0.86  20 

Table of Contents

NICKEL(23) 
 
  
 PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES PROVEN AND PROBABLE
RESERVES
 
PROPERTY
 OPERATOR Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Nickel
Grade
(% Ni)
 Nickel
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Nickel
Grade
(% Ni)
 Nickel
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Nickel
Grade
(% Ni)
 Nickel
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 
Voisey's Bay Vale  24.03  3.01  1,447  3.53  0.66  47  27.56  2.71  1,493 
Avebury (DEV)(7) Minerals and Metals Group  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  6.50  0.96  123 
Mt. Goode Cosmos(7)(24) Xstrata  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  DNR  2.20  3.46  152 

COBALT(25)

 
 
  
 PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES PROVEN AND PROBABLE
RESERVES
 
PROPERTY
 OPERATOR Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Cobalt
Grade
(% Co)
 Cobalt
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Cobalt
Grade
(% Co)
 Cobalt
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 Tons of
Ore
(millions)
 Ave.
Cobalt
Grade
(% Co)
 Cobalt
Contained
Lbs
(millions)(6)
 
Voisey's Bay Vale  24.03  0.15  72  3.53  0.03  2  27.56  0.13  74 

(1)
Set forth below are the definitions of proven and probable reserves used by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


"Reserve" is that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.


"Proven (Measured) Reserves" are reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes, and the grade is computed from the results of detailed sampling, and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that the size, shape, depth and mineral content of the reserves are well established.


"Probable (Indicated) Reserves" are reserves for which the quantity and grade are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance of probable (indicated) reserves, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume geological continuity between points of observation.

(2)
Royal Gold has disclosed a number of reserve estimates that are provided by mine operators that are foreign issuers and are not based on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's definitions for proven and probable reserves. For Canadian issuers, definitions of "mineral reserve," "proven mineral reserve," and "probable mineral reserve" conform to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum definitions of these terms as of the effective date of estimation as required by National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators. For Australian issuers, definitions of "mineral reserve," "proven mineral reserve," and "probable mineral reserve" conform with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves1,2,3 prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia, as amended ("JORC Code").
As
(3)
The reserves reported are either estimates received by the various operators or are based on royalty documentation material provided to Royal Gold or which is derived from recent publicly-available information from the operators of the various properties or various recent National Instrument 43-101 or JORC Code reports filed by operators. Accordingly, Royal Gold is not able to reconcile the reserve estimates prepared in reliance on National Instrument 43-101 or JORC Code with definitions of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

(4)
Reserves have been reported by the operators as of December 31, 20084,52009, with the exception of the following properties: El Chanate—October 2009; Balcooma, Gwalia, South Laverton, and Southern Cross—June 2009; Inata—March 2009; Canadian Malartic, Dolores, Gold Hill and Pascua-Lama—December 2008; Schaft Creek—September 2008; Holt—June 2008; Soledad Mountain—December 2007; Wolverine—October 2007; and Pine Cove—March 2005.

(5)
Gold reserves were calculated by the operators at the following per ounce prices: $950—Martha; $825—Bald Mountain, Cortez, Goldstrike, Marigold, Peñasquito and Wharf; $800—El Chanate, Leeville, Mulatos, Robinson, Twin Creeks, Siquiri and Taparko; $775—Canadian Malartic and Holt; $750—Pascua-Lama and Williams; $725—Gold Hill; $700—El Toqui; $600—Dolores, Soledad Mountain and Wolverine; $550—El Limon and Inata; $500—Andacollo; and $425—Pine Cove. For Gwalia Deeps and Southern Cross, a price of A$1,075 was used for St. Barbara's 2010 fiscal year and A$850 per ounce thereafter; $A1,250—South Laverton. Schaft Creek is at a $5.05 net smelter return cut-off grade (metal price assumptions used by the operator were $658 per ounce gold; $10.00 per ounce silver; and $1.93 per pound copper). No gold price was reported for Balcooma, Meekatharra (Paddy's Flat) or Meekatharra (Yaloginda).

(6)
"Contained ounces" or "contained pounds" do not take into account recovery losses in processing the ore.

(7)
The operators at Avebury, Bald Mountain, Canadian Malartic, Dolores, El Limon, Goldstrike, Marigold and Mt. Goode did not provide a breakdown of proven and probable reserves.

(8)
NVR1 and GSR3 reserves and additional mineralized material are subsets of the reserves and additional mineralized material covered by GSR1 and GSR2.

(9)
The 2.0% NSR royalty interest covers the majority of six sections of land, containing a number of open pits, but does not cover the current mining in the Basalt/Antler area.
                                       
                            PROVEN + PROBABLE
    PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES RESERVES
        Avg. Gold     Avg. Gold     Avg. Gold
    Tons of Gold Contained Tons of Gold Contained Tons of Gold Contained
    Ore Grade Ozs6 Ore Grade Ozs6 Ore Grade Ozs6
PROPERTY OPERATOR (millions) (oz/ton) (millions) (millions) (oz/ton) (millions) (millions) (oz/ton) (millions)
Bald Mountain7
 Barrick DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  27.45   0.026   0.720 
Cortez (Pipeline) GSR1 Barrick  3.80   0.095   0.360   24.14   0.051   1.227   27.94   0.057   1.587 8
Cortez (Pipeline) GSR2 Barrick  8.29   0.038   0.312   74.65   0.032   2.362   82.95   0.032   2.674 8
Cortez (Pipeline) GSR3 Barrick  5.48   0.076   0.414   41.32   0.039   1.619   46.79   0.043   2.033 8
Cortez (Pipeline) NVR1 Barrick  3.69   0.047   0.173   38.46   0.037   1.419   42.15   0.038   1.592 8
Gold Hill
(DEV)
 Kinross/Barrick  0.28   0.013   0.004   31.08   0.015   0.459   31.37   0.015   0.463 
Goldstrike7
 Barrick DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  47.82   0.121   5.768 
(SJ Claims)                                      
Leeville7
 Newmont DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  7.68   0.328   2.518 
Marigold9
(DEV)
 Goldcorp/Barrick  11.75   0.021   0.251   23.89   0.018   0.433   35.63   0.019   0.683 
Robinson Quadra  130.04   0.007   0.884   4.10   0.005   0.021   134.14   0.007   0.905 
Twin Creeks7
 Newmont DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  0.080 
Wharf10
 Goldcorp  11.61   0.023   0.270   1.39   0.022   0.030   13.00   0.023   0.300 
Canadian Malartic7,11
(DEV)
 Osisko Mining DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  150.56   0.031   4.727 
Holt12
(DEV)
 St Andrew Goldfields  0.11   0.187   0.021   2.84   0.164   0.466   2.95   0.165   0.486 
Pine Cove
(DEV)
 New Island Resources/ Anaconda Mining  0.00   0.000   0.000   2.57   0.081   0.207   2.57   0.081   0.207 
Williams Barrick  7.78   0.073   0.567   1.80   0.103   0.185   9.57   0.079   0.752 

34Table of Contents


TABLE 1 (Continued)
Proven
(10)
In November 2008, the operator made application to a court in Ontario, Canada for a declaration that it is not obligated to pay the entire royalty defined under the royalty agreement and Probableto dispute the royalty rate. The operator claims that its predecessor in interest is responsible for payment of some or all of the royalty. On July 23, 2009, the Court held that Royal Gold Reserves1,2,3is entitled to payment from the predecessor of the full amount of the NSR sliding-scale royalty and that the operator's obligation is to reimburse the predecessor for payment of the royalty up to a flat rate of 0.013% NSR. On August 21, 2009, the predecessor appealed the portion of the judgment holding them responsible for paying the royalty and on December 9, 2009, Royal Gold was made a party to the appeal.

(11)
Operator reports reserves by material type. The sulfide material will be processed by milling. The oxide material will be processed by heap leaching.

(12)
Royalty applies to all gold production from an area of interest in Chile. Only that portion of the reserves pertaining to our royalty interest in Chile is reflected here.

(13)
Approximately 74% of the royalty is limited to the first 14.0 million ounces of gold produced from the project. Also, 30% of the royalty can be extended beyond 14.0M ounces for $6.4 million. In addition, a one-time payment totaling $4.0 million will be made if gold prices exceed $550 per ounce for any six-month period within the first 36 months after commercial production and an additional payment totaling $6.4 million will be made if gold prices exceed $600 per ounce for any six-month period within the first 36 months after commercial production.

(14)
Figures reflect reserves associated with the entire property. The operator did not provide a detailed breakdown of the reserves and additional mineralized material subject to Royal Gold's royalty interest. Therefore, a portion of the reserves may not be subject to Royal Gold's royalty interest.

(15)
Royalty percentages: TB-GSR1—15.0%; TB-GSR2—4.3% when the average monthly gold price ranges between $385 and $430 per ounce. Outside of this range, the royalty rate is calculated by dividing the average monthly gold price by 100 for gold prices above $430 per ounce (with a 10% cap), or by dividing the average monthly gold price by 90 for gold prices below $385 per ounce (e.g., a $900 per ounce gold price results in a rate of 900/100 = 9.0%). Two subsequent royalties consist of ("TB-GSR3"), applicable to gold production from defined portions of the Taparko-Bouroum project area, and a 0.75% GSR milling royalty ("TB-MR1"). The TB-MR1 royalty applies to ore that is mined outside of the defined area of the Taparko-Bouroum project that is processed through the Taparko facilities up to a maximum of 1.1 million tons per year. Both the TB-GSR3 and TB-MR1 royalties commence once TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 have ceased. Both TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 continue until either production reaches 804,420 ounces of gold, or payments totaling $35 million under TB-GSR1 are received, whichever comes first. As of December 31, 20084,5June 30, 2010, Royal Gold has cumulatively recognized approximately $30.6 million in royalty revenue under TB-GSR1 that is attributable to cumulative production of approximately 171,000 ounces of gold.

(16)
Due to the royalty structure at the Taparko mine, reserves are not broken down into proven and probable.

(17)
TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 royalties are subject to the same reserve.

(18)
The reserves at Taparko have been adjusted by Royal Gold based on actual 2009 depletion and on the operator's reserve gold price assumption of $800 per ounce, to reflect the $35 million cap on the TB-GSR1 royalty. Upon meeting this cap, both the TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 royalties cease and the TB-GSR3 royalty becomes effective. The TB-GSR3 reserves represent the remaining reserves after subtracting the reserves associated with TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2.

(19)
Silver reserves were calculated by the operators at the following prices per ounce: $16.00—Martha; $13.00—Peñasquito; $12.55—El Toqui; $12.33—Troy; $12.00—Soledad Mountain; and $10.00—Dolores. Shaft Creek is at a $5.05 per tonne net smelter return cut-off grade (metal price assumptions used by the operator were $658 per ounce gold; $10.00 per ounce silver; and $1.93 per pound copper). Wolverine is at a $80 per tonne NSR cut-off grade (metal price assumptions used by the operator were $400 per ounce gold; $7.00 per ounce silver; $1.10 per pound copper; $0.30 per pound lead; and $0.60 per pound zinc). No silver price is available for Balcooma. Don Mario additional mineralized material was calculated at a silver price of $11.00 per ounce.

(20)
Copper reserves were calculated by the operators at the following prices per pound: $2.91 or lower—Voisey's Bay; $2.67—Troy; $2.00—Robinson and Las Cruces; $1.50—Johnson Camp. Shaft Creek is at a $5.05 net smelter return cut-off grade (metal price assumptions used by the operator were $658 per ounce gold; $10.00 per ounce silver; and $1.93 per pound copper). No copper price is available for Balcooma or Caber.

(21)
Lead reserves were calculated by the operators at the following price per pound: $0.83 — El Toqui and $0.60—Peñasquito. No lead price is available for Balcooma.

(22)
Zinc reserves were calculated by the operators at the following price per pound: $1.00 — El Toqui; and $0.80—Peñasquito. No zinc price is available for Balcooma or Caber.

(23)
Nickel reserve price was calculated by the operator at Voisey's Bay mine at $11.01 or lower per pound. No nickel reserve price is available for Avebury or Mt. Goode.

(24)
The operator does not report reserves by property in Australia. Therefore, a portion of the reserves is not subject to Royal Gold's royalty interest.

(25)
Cobalt reserve price was calculated by the operator at $22.70 or lower per pound.
                                     
                          PROVEN + PROBABLE
    PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES RESERVES
      Avg. Gold     Avg. Gold     Avg. Gold
    Tons of Gold Contained Tons of Gold Contained Tons of Gold Contained
    Ore Grade Ozs 6 Ore Grade Ozs 6 Ore Grade Ozs 6
PROPERTY OPERATOR (millions) (oz/ton) (millions) (millions) (oz/ton) (millions) (millions) (oz/ton) (millions)
Dolores13
 Minefinders 62.42  0.023   1.454   47.04   0.021   0.990   109.46   0.022   2.444 
El Chanate14
 Capital Gold 23.03  0.023   0.519   24.52   0.020   0.395   47.55   0.022   0.913 
Mulatos15
 Alamos 13.01  0.050   0.649   39.52   0.035   1.397   52.53   0.039   2.046 
Peñasquito16(Oxide)
 Goldcorp 63.71  0.006   0.360   137.40   0.003   0.430   201.11   0.004   0.800 
Peñasquito16(Sulfide)(DEV)
 Goldcorp 618.62  0.018   11.390   493.53   0.011   5.250   1,112.15   0.015   16.630 
Don Mario7,17(LMZ)
 Orvana DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  0.21   0.290   0.060 
El Limon B2Gold 0.08  0.157   0.012   1.20   0.135   0.162   1.28   0.136   0.174 
El Toqui18
 Breakwater 0.73  0.105   0.077   2.95   0.070   0.207   3.68   0.077   0.284 
Martha Coeur d’Alene 0.02  0.07   0.001   0.06   0.04   0.002   0.08   0.04   0.003 
Pascua-Lama19(DEV)
 Barrick 36.10  0.053   1.917   288.60   0.044   12.698   324.70   0.045   14.615 
Balcooma20
 Kagara 0.35  0.020   0.007   2.44   0.008   0.019   2.79   0.009   0.026 
Meekatharra21(Paddy’s Flat)
(DEV)
 Mercator Gold 0.00  0.000   0.000   2.19   0.140   0.308   2.19   0.140   0.308 
Siguiri22
 Anglogold Ashanti 61.87  0.016   1.010   73.98   0.030   2.240   135.85   0.024   3.250 
Taparko23
TB-GSR1 and
TB-GSR2
 High River DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  3.09   0.085   0.262 24,25
Taparko23
TB-GSR3
 High River DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  6.42   0.085   0.544 

35


TABLE 1 (Continued)
Proven and Probable Silver Reserves1,2,3
AsTable of December 31, 20085,26
                                       
                            PROVEN + PROBABLE
    PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES RESERVES
        Avg. Silver     Avg. Silver     Avg. Silver
    Tons of Silver Contained Tons of Silver Contained Tons of Silver Contained
    Ore Grade Ozs6 Ore Grade Ozs6 Ore Grade Ozs6
PROPERTY OPERATOR (millions) (oz/ton) (millions) (millions) (oz/ton) (millions) (millions) (oz/ton) (millions)
Troy 7.0% GSR 23
 Revett                    0.48   1.19   0.569 27
6.1% GSR
                            1.72   1.19   2.046 
2.0% GSR                            0.98   1.19   1.164 
Dolores13
 Minefinders  62.42   1.18   73.415   47.04   1.13   53.230   109.46   1.16   126.645 
Peñasquito16(Oxide )
 Goldcorp  63.71   0.54   34.300   137.40   0.28   37.800   201.11   0.36   72.100 
Peñasquito16(Sulfide)
(DEV)
 Goldcorp  618.62   0.99   611.500   493.53   0.73   362.100   1,112.15   0.88   973.600 
El Toqui18
 Breakwater  0.73   0.15   0.106   2.95   0.38   1.121   3.68   0.33   1.227 
Martha Coeur d’Alene  0.02   55.86   0.992   0.06   31.22   1.817   0.08   36.99   2.809 
Balcooma20
 Kagara  0.35   1.87   0.654   2.44   0.41   1.003   2.79   0.59   1.657 

36Contents


TABLE 1 (Continued)
Proven and Probable Base Metal and Other Reserves1,2,3
As of December 31, 20085
COPPER 28
                                       
                            PROVEN + PROBABLE
    PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES RESERVES
        Avg. Copper     Avg. Copper     Avg. Copper
    Tons of Copper Contained Tons of Copper Contained Tons of Copper Contained
    Ore Grade Lbs6 Ore Grade Lbs6 Ore Grade Lbs6
PROPERTY OPERATOR (millions) (% Cu) (millions) (millions) (% Cu) (millions) (millions) (% Cu) (millions)
Robinson Quadra  130.04   0.55   1,420   4.10   0.42   35   134.14   0.54   1,455 
Troy 7% GSR23
 Revett DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  0.44   0.57   5 27
6.1% GSR                            1.50   0.57   17 
2.0% GSR                            2.38   0.57   27 
El Toqui18
 Breakwater  0.00   0.00   0   2.95   0.10   6   2.95   0.10   6 
Balcooma20
 Kagara  0.35   1.30   9   2.44   3.05   149   2.79   2.83   158 
ZINC29
                                       
                            PROVEN + PROBABLE
    PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES RESERVES
        Avg. Zinc     Avg. Zinc     Avg. Zinc
    Tons of Zinc Contained Tons of Zinc Contained Tons of Zinc Contained
    Ore Grade Lbs6 Ore Grade Lbs6 Ore Grade Lbs6
PROPERTY OPERATOR (millions) (% Zn) (millions) (millions) (% Zn) (millions) (millions) (% Zn) (millions)
Peñasquito16
(Sulfide)
(DEV)
 Goldcorp  618.62   0.77   9,587   493.53   0.59   5,776   1,112.15   0.69   15,364 
El Toqui18
 Breakwater  0.73   7.30   106   2.95   7.10   419   3.68   7.14   525 
Balcooma20
 Kagara  0.35   7.20   50   2.44   0.43   21   2.79   1.28   71 
LEAD30
                                       
                            PROVEN + PROBABLE
    PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES RESERVES
        Avg. Lead     Avg. Lead     Avg. Lead
    Tons of Lead Contained Tons of Lead Contained Tons of Lead Contained
    Ore Grade Lbs6 Ore Grade Lbs6 Ore Grade Lbs6
PROPERTY OPERATOR (millions) (% Pb) (millions) (millions) (% Pb) (millions) (millions) (% Pb) (millions)
Peñasquito16
(Sulfide)
(DEV)
 Goldcorp  618.62   0.36   4,437   493.53   0.27   2,633   1,112.15   0.32   7,070 
El Toqui18
 Breakwater  0.73   0.20   3   2.95   0.50   30   3.68   0.44   33 
Balcooma20
 Kagara  0.35   2.60   18   2.44   0.19   9   2.79   0.49   27 

37


TABLE 1 (Continued)
Proven and Probable Base Metal and Other Reserves1,2,3
As of December 31, 20085
NICKEL31
                                       
                            PROVEN + PROBABLE
    PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES RESERVES
        Avg. Nickel     Avg. Nickel     Avg. Nickel
    Tons of Nickel Contained Tons of Nickel Contained Tons of Nickel Contained
    Ore Grade Lbs6 Ore Grade Lbs6 Ore Grade Lbs6
PROPERTY OPERATOR (millions) (% Ni) (millions) (millions) (% Ni) (millions) (millions) (% Ni) (millions)
Mt. Goode7(Cosmos)
 Xstrata DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  1.21   4.12   101 
POTASH32
                                       
                            PROVEN + PROBABLE
    PROVEN RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES RESERVES
            Finished         Finished         Finished
            Product         Product         Product
    Tons of Avg. Contained Tons of Avg. Contained Tons of Avg. Contained
    Ore K20 Tons6 Ore K20 Tons6 Ore K20 Tons6
PROPERTY OPERATOR (millions) Grade (millions) (millions) Grade (millions) (millions) Grade (millions)
Allan7,33,34
 Potash Corporation DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR  361.55   25.90  DNR
  of Saskatchewan                                    

38


FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 1
1Set forth below are the definitions of proven and probable reserves used by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Reserve” is that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.
“Proven (Measured) Reserves” are reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes, and the grade is computed from the results of detailed sampling, and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that the size, shape, depth and mineral content of the reserves are well established.
“Probable (Indicated) Reserves” are reserves for which the quantity and grade are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance of probable (indicated) reserves, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume geological continuity between points of observation.
2Royal Gold has disclosed a number of reserve estimates that are provided by royalty operators that are foreign issuers and are not based on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s definitions for proven and probable reserves. For Canadian issuers, definitions of “mineral reserve,” “proven mineral reserve,” and “probable mineral reserve” conform to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum definitions of these terms as of the effective date of estimation as required by National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators. For Australian issuers, definitions of “mineral reserve,” “proven mineral reserve,” and “probable mineral reserve” conform with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia, as amended (“JORC Code”).
3The reserves reported are either estimates received by the various operators or are based on royalty documentation material provided to Royal Gold or which is derived from recent publicly-available information from the operators of the various properties or various recent National Instrument 43-101 or JORC Code reports filed by operators. Accordingly, Royal Gold is not able to reconcile the reserve estimates prepared in reliance on National Instrument 43-101 or JORC Code with definitions of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
4Gold reserves were calculated by the operators at the following per ounce prices: $800 — Robinson and Taparko; $775 — Canadian Malartic and Holt; $750 — El Chanate, Don Mario, Martha and Williams; $725 — Bald Mountain, Cortez (Pipeline Mining Complex), Gold Hill; Goldstrike, Leeville, Marigold, Pascua-Lama, Peñasquito, Twin Creeks and Wharf; $720 — Siguiri; $700 — Mulatos; $600 — Dolores and El Toqui; $550 — El Limon, and $425 — Pine Cove. No gold price is reported for Balcooma and Meekatharra.
5Reserves have been reported by the operators as of December 31, 2008, with the exception of the following properties: Dolores — March 25, 2008; Balcooma — June 30, 2008; Don Mario — September 30, 2008; Mt. Goode — October 31, 2008; and Pine Cove — March 18, 2005.
6“Contained ounces” or “contained pounds” do not take into account recovery losses in processing the ore.
7The operators at Allan, Bald Mountain, Canadian Malartic, Don Mario, Goldstrike, Leeville, Mt. Goode and Twin Creeks did not provide a breakdown of proven and probable reserves.
8NVR1 and GSR3 reserves are subsets of the reserves covered by GSR1 and GSR2 reserves.
9The 2.0% NSR royalty interest covers the majority of six sections of land, containing a number of open pits, but does not cover the current mining in the Basalt/Antler area.
10NSR sliding-scale schedule (price of gold per ounce — royalty rate): $0.00 to under $350 — 0.0%; $350 to under $400 — 0.5%; $400 to under $500 — 1.0%; $500 or higher — 2.0%.

39


FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 1 (Continued)
11Royalty is subject to a buy down right of $1.0 — $1.5 million depending on the price of gold, exercisable at any time, for one-half of the royalty. NSR sliding-scale schedule (price of gold per ounce — royalty rate): $0.00 to $350 — 2.0%; above $350 — 3.0%.
12See “Recent Developments, Property Developments” within Item 7, MD&A, of this report for further discussion on our Holt royalty.
13Dolores reserve numbers have not been updated to remove material consumed in late 2008 commissioning activities.
14The NSR sliding-scale royalty is capped once payments of approximately $17.0 million have been received. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $14.7 million remains under the cap.
15The Company’s royalty is subject to a 2.0 million ounce cap on gold production. There have been approximately 416,000 ounces of cumulative production as of June 30, 2009. NSR sliding-scale schedule (price of gold per ounce — royalty rate): $0.00 to $299.99 — 1.0%; $300 to $324.99 — 1.50%; $325 to $349.99 — 2.0%; $350 to $374.99 — 3.0%; $375 to $399.99 — 4.0%; $400 or higher — 5.0%.
16Operator reported reserve estimates by oxide and sulfide material types. The sulfide material will be processed by milling. The oxide material will be processed using heap leaching.
17The Don Mario reserves are contained in the lower mineralized zone (“LMZ”). The upper mineralized zone (“UMZ”) is currently the subject of a feasibility study which is not yet public.
18NSR sliding-scale schedule (price of zinc per ounce — royalty rate): $0.50 to below $0.55 — 1.0%; $0.55 to below $0.60 — 2.0%; $0.60 or higher — 3.0%. Gold is produced as a by-product of zinc.
19Royalty applies to all gold production from an area of interest within Chile. Only that portion of the reserves pertaining to our royalty interest in Chile is reflected here.
20A portion of the reported reserves may not be subject to Royal Gold’s royalty interests.
21Royalty applies on production above 50,000 ounces.
22The royalty is capped on a dollar basis, and approximately $7.9 million remains unrecognized as of June 30, 2009.
23Due to the royalty structure at the Taparko and Troy mines, reserves cannot be broken down into proven and probable.
24TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 royalties are subject to the same reserve.
25The reserves at Taparko have been adjusted by Royal Gold based on actual 2008 depletion and on the operator’s reserve gold price assumption of $800 per ounce, to reflect the $35 million cap on the TB-GSR1 royalty. Upon meeting this cap, both the TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 royalties cease and the TB-GSR3 royalty becomes effective. The TB-GSR3 reserves represent the remaining reserves after subtracting the reserves associated with TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2.
26Silver reserves were calculated by the operators at the following prices per ounce: $13.25 for Martha; $12.00 for Peñasquito and Troy; $11.00 for El Toqui; and $10.00 for Dolores. No silver price is available for Balcooma.
27The reserves subject to the 7.0% GSR royalty have been calculated by Royal Gold based on the expectation of meeting the monetary cap of $10.5 million in cumulative payments. Royal Gold used the operator’s December 31, 2008 silver and copper reserve prices of $12.00 per ounce and $2.25 per pound, respectively, to calculate this adjustment.
28Copper reserves were calculated by the operators at $2.00 per pound for Robinson; $2.25 per pound for Troy; $2.50 per pound for El Toqui. No copper price is available for Balcooma.
29Zinc reserves were calculated by the operators at the following price per pound: $1.00 for El Toqui; and $0.80 for Peñasquito. No zinc price is available for Balcooma.

40


FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 1 (Continued)
30Lead reserves were calculated by the operators at the following price per pound: $0.50 for Peñasquito and $0.70 for El Toqui. No lead price is available for Balcooma.
31Nickel reserve price was not available.
32Potash reserve price was not available.
33The reserve calculation parameters used by the operator to determine reserves can be found in its 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The operator did not report tons of finished product.
34The royalty applies to 40% of production. The royalty rate is $1.44 per ton for the first 600,000 tons on which the royalty is paid, reducing to $0.72 per ton on between 600,000 and 800,000 tons and to $0.36 per ton above 800,000 tons. The sliding-scale is applicable when the price of potash drops below $23 per ton. Given the North American market price for potash, the complete sliding-scale schedule is not presented here. In addition, there is a $0.25 per ton royalty payable on annual production up to 600,000 tons.

41


ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Casmalia

Voisey's Bay

        On February 22, 2010, as part of the IRC Transaction discussed in Item 7, MD&A, we acquired a royalty on the Voisey's Bay Mine in Newfoundland and Labrador owned by Vale Newfoundland & Labrador Limited ("VNL"). The royalty is owned by the Labrador Nickel Royalty Limited Partnership ("LNRLP"), in which the Company's wholly-owned indirect subsidiary Canadian Minerals Partnership is the general partner and 89.99% owner. The remaining interests in LNRLP are owned by Altius Resources Hazardous Waste Disposal Site

On March 24, 2000, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”Inc. (10%) notified, a company unrelated to Royal Gold and 92IRC, and the Company's wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, Voisey's Bay Holding Corporation (0.01%).

        On October 16, 2009, LNRLP filed a claim in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador Trial Division against Vale Inco Limited ("Vale Inco") and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Vale Inco Atlantic Sales Limited ("VIASL") and VNL, related to calculation of the NSR on the sale of concentrates, including nickel concentrates, from the Voisey's Bay Mine to Vale Inco. The claim asserts that Vale Inco is incorrectly calculating the NSR. The claim asserts that Vale Inco is incorrectly calculating the NSR and requests an order in respect of the correct calculation of future payments. The claim also requests specific damages for underpayment of past royalties to the date of the claim in an amount not less than $29 million, together with additional damages until the date of trial, interest, costs and other entities that they were considered potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”damages.

Holt

        On October 1, 2008, as part of the Company's acquisition of a portfolio of royalties from Barrick, we acquired a royalty on the Holt portion of the development stage Holloway-Holt mining project in Ontario, Canada, owned by St Andrew Goldfields Ltd. ("St Andrew"). St Andrew succeeded Newmont Canada Corporation ("Newmont Canada") as owner of the Holloway-Holt mining project in November 2006. By virtue of the Company's acquisition of Barrick's royalty portfolio, RGLD Gold Canada, Inc. ("RGLD Gold") succeeded Barrick as the royalty payee under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,royalty agreement.

        On or about November 3, 2008, St Andrew filed an action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the "Court") seeking, among other things, declarations by the Court that St Andrew's obligation in respect of the royalty is limited to only a portion of the total royalty payable, and Liability Actthat any additional royalty obligations under the royalty agreement remain the responsibility of 1980,Newmont Canada. Newmont Canada responded that St Andrew is responsible for all royalty obligations under the royalty agreement.

        Royal Gold and RGLD Gold (collectively "Royal Gold") and Barrick were joined as amended (“Superfund”), atnecessary parties to the Casmalia Resources Hazardous Waste Disposal Site (the “Site”)litigation in Santa Barbara County, California. EPA’s allegationJanuary 2009. Trial concerning calculation of the royalty and the party or parties responsible for paying it was held from January 30, 2009 to February 12, 2009. On July 23, 2009, the Court held that Royal Gold wasis entitled to payment from Newmont Canada of the full amount of the sliding-scale NSR royalty on gold produced from the Holt mine. The Court also held that St Andrew's sole obligation is to reimburse Newmont Canada for payment of the royalty up to a PRP was basedflat rate of 0.013% of the net smelter returns for gold, silver and other metals. On August 21, 2009, Newmont Canada appealed the Court's decision to the Court of Appeal of Ontario and on the disposal of allegedly hazardous petroleum exploration wastes at the Site by Royal Gold’s predecessor, Royal Resources, Inc., during 1983 and 1984.

After extensive negotiations, on September 23, 2002,December 9, 2009, made Royal Gold along with 35 members of the PRP group targeted by EPA, entered into a Partial Consent Decree with EPA and the United States Department of Justice intending to settle their liability for past and future clean-up costs incurred or expected to be incurred at the Site by the federal government. The United States District Court for the Central District of California entered the Partial Consent Decree on August 14, 2003. Based on the minimal volume of allegedly hazardous substances that Royal Resources, Inc. disposed of at the Site, which was characterized in volume as de minimis, our share of the $25.3 million settlement amount was approximately $0.1 million, which we deposited into the escrow account that the PRP group set up for that purpose in January 2002. The funds were paidparty to the United States Treasury on May 9, 2003 and the Partial Consent Decree was executed. As a result of the settlement, the United States of America may only pursue Royal Gold and the other PRPs for additional clean-up costs if the United States’ total clean-up costs at the Site significantly exceed the expected cost of approximately $272 million.
Royal Gold also executed a de minimis party Administrative Order on Consent (“AOC”) with the State of California on January 15, 2009. The AOC will become effective after notice from the California Attorney General that the required 30-day public comment period has closed and that comments received, if any, do not require modifications to or withdrawal of the AOC by the State of California. It is not anticipated at this date that any such modifications or withdrawals will occur.
Under the terms of the federal Partial Consent Decree and the state AOC, we believe our potential liability to the United States of America, the State of California, and third parties to be effectively settled and any further exposure related to the Casmalia site to be a remote possibility.
appeal.

Contents



PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’SREGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information and Current Stockholders

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”("NASDAQ") under the symbol “RGLD”"RGLD" and on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “RGL.”"RGL." The following table sets forth, for each of the quarterly periods indicated, the range of high and low sales prices, in U.S. dollars, for theour common stock on NASDAQ for each quarter since July 1, 2006.2008.

             
      Sales Prices
Fiscal Year:   High Low
 2007  First Quarter (July, Aug., Sept. — 2006) $31.82  $25.67 
    Second Quarter (Oct., Nov., Dec. — 2006) $37.50  $24.12 
    Third Quarter (Jan., Feb., March — 2007) $36.50  $29.31 
    Fourth Quarter (April, May, June — 2007) $30.87  $23.25 
             
 2008  First Quarter (July, Aug., Sept. — 2007) $34.36  $23.85 
    Second Quarter (Oct., Nov., Dec. — 2007) $35.39  $26.54 
    Third Quarter (Jan., Feb., March — 2008) $35.42  $27.51 
    Fourth Quarter (April, May, June — 2008) $32.93  $26.87 
             
 2009  First Quarter (July, Aug., Sept. — 2008) $39.50  $26.88 
    Second Quarter (Oct., Nov., Dec. — 2008) $49.45  $22.75 
    Third Quarter (Jan., Feb., March — 2009) $49.81  $35.76 
    Fourth Quarter (April, May, June — 2009) $48.69  $34.16 
 
  
 Sales Prices 
Fiscal Year:
  
 High Low 
 2009 First Quarter (July, Aug., Sept.—2008) $39.50 $26.88 
   Second Quarter (Oct., Nov., Dec.—2008) $49.45 $22.75 
   Third Quarter (Jan., Feb., March—2009) $49.81 $35.76 
   Fourth Quarter (April, May, June—2009) $48.69 $34.16 

 

2010

 

First Quarter (July, Aug., Sept.—2009)

 

$

49.35

 

$

37.35

 
   Second Quarter (Oct., Nov., Dec.—2009) $55.96 $42.90 
   Third Quarter (Jan., Feb., March—2010) $50.98 $41.19 
   Fourth Quarter (April, May, June—2010) $54.85 $46.51 

As of August 14, 2009,24, 2010, there were 1,068 shareholders929 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have paid a cash dividend on our common stock for each calendar year beginning in calendar year 2000. Our board of directors has discretion in determining whether to declare a dividend based on a number of factors including, prevailing gold prices, economic market conditions and funding requirements for future opportunities or operations.

        For calendar year 2010, we paid an annual dividend of $0.36 per share of common stock, in four quarterly payments of $0.09 each. We paid the first payment of $0.09 per share on January 15, 2010, to stockholders of record at the close of business on January 4, 2010. We paid the second payment of $0.09 per share on April 16, 2010, to common stockholders and the holders of Exchangeable Shares of record at the close of business on April 1, 2010. We paid the third payment of $0.09 per share on July 16, 2010 to common stockholders and holders of Exchangeable Shares of record at the close of business on July 2, 2010. We anticipate paying the fourth payment of $0.09 per share on October 15, 2010, to common shareholders and holders of Exchangeable Shares of record at the close of business on October 1, 2010.

For calendar year 2009, we announced an annual dividend of $0.32 per share of common stock, payable in four quarterly payments of $0.08 each. The first payment of $0.08 per share was made on January 16, 2009, to shareholdersstockholders of record at the close of business on January 2, 2009. The second payment of $0.08 per share was made on April 17, 2009, to shareholdersstockholders of record at the close of business on April 3, 2009. The third payment of $0.08 per share was made on July 17, 2009, to shareholdersstockholders of record at the close of business on July 2, 2009. We anticipate payingpaid the fourth payment of $0.08 per share on October 16, 2009, to shareholdersstockholders of record at the close of business on October 2, 2009.

For calendar year 2008, we announced an annual dividend of $0.28 per share of common stock, payable in four quarterly payments of $0.07 each. The first payment of $0.07 per share was made on

43


January 18, 2008, to shareholders of record at close of business on January 4, 2008. The second payment of $0.07 per share was made on April 18, 2008, to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 4, 2008. The third payment of $0.07 per share was made on July 18, 2008, to shareholders of record at the close of business on July 3, 2008. We paid the fourth payment of $0.07 per share on October 17, 2008, to shareholders of record at the close of business on October 3, 2008.
For calendar year 2007, we paid an annual dividend of $0.26 per share of common stock, in four quarterly payments of $0.065 each. We paid the first payment of $0.065 per share on January 19, 2007, to shareholders of record at the close of business on January 5, 2007. We paid the second payment of $0.065 per share on April 20, 2007, to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 5, 2007. We paid the third payment of $0.065 per share on July 20, 2007 to shareholders of record at the close of business on July 6, 2007. We paid the fourth payment of $0.065 per share on October 19, 2007, to shareholders of record at the close of business on October 5, 2007.
We currently plan to pay dividends on a calendar year basis, subject to the discretion of our board of directors. However, our board of directors may determine not to declare a dividend based on a number of factors, including the gold price, economic and market conditions and the financial needs ofor opportunities that might arise in the future.



ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Statements
 
 Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 

Royalty revenue(1)

 $136,565 $73,771 $66,297 $48,357 $28,380 

Operating income

 $41,035 $27,292 $32,982 $28,506 $13,412 

Net income

 $29,422 $41,357 $25,395 $21,242 $11,350 

Net income attributable to Royal Gold stockholders

 $21,492 $38,348 $24,043 $19,720 $11,350 

Net income available to Royal Gold common stockholders

 $21,492 $38,348 $19,255 $19,720 $11,350 

Net income per share available to Royal Gold common stockholders:

                

Basic

 $0.49 $1.09 $0.62 $0.79 $0.50 

Diluted

 $0.49 $1.07 $0.61 $0.79 $0.49 

Dividends declared per common share(2)

 $0.34 $0.30 $0.28 $0.25 $0.22 


 
 As of June 30, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 

Total assets

 $1,861,333 $809,924 $545,850 $356,649 $171,765 

Royalty interests in mineral properties, net

 $1,467,983 $455,966 $300,670 $215,839 $84,590 

Long-term debt, including current portion

 $248,500 $19,250 $15,750 $15,750 $ 

Royal Gold stockholders' equity

 $1,403,716 $749,441 $483,217 $319,081 $161,660 

(1)
Please refer to Item 7, MD&A, of Operations Datathis report for a discussion of recent developments that contributed to our 85% increase in royalty revenue during fiscal year 2010 when compared to fiscal year 2009.

(2)
The 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 calendar year dividends were $0.36, $0.32, $0.28, $0.26 and $0.22, respectively, as approved by our board of directors. Please refer to Item 5 of this report for further information on our dividends.
                     
  For The Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
Amounts in thousands, except per share data 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Royalty revenue $73,771  $66,297  $48,357  $28,380  $25,302 
Costs of operations  3,551   3,664   3,265   2,288   1,847 
General and administrative expense  7,352   7,208   5,824   5,022   3,695 
Exploration and business development  2,998   4,079   2,493   3,397   1,893 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  32,578   18,364   8,269   4,261   3,205 
Income tax expense  21,857   12,050   9,549   5,101   4,102 
Net income  38,348   24,043   19,720   11,350   11,454 
Net income available to common stockholders  38,348   19,255   19,720   11,350   11,454 
Basic earnings per share  1.08   0.62   0.79   0.50   0.55 
Diluted earnings per share  1.07   0.61   0.79   0.49   0.54 
Common dividends declared per share(1)
  0.30   0.28   0.25   0.22   0.19 
(1)The 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 calendar year dividends were $0.32, $0.28, $0.26,$0.22 and $0.20, respectively, as approved by our board of directors. Please refer to Item 5 of this report for further information on our common dividends.

44


Selected Balance Sheet Data
                     
  For The Fiscal Years Ended June 30,
Amounts in thousands 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
Total assets $809,924  $545,850  $356,649  $171,765  $102,158 
Working capital  312,519   202,043   90,995   81,452   53,330 
Royalty interests in mineral properties, net  455,966   300,670   215,839   84,590   44,817 
Note payable  19,250   15,750   15,750       
Other long-term liabilities  703   504   98   98   97 
Net deferred tax liabilities  23,371   26,034   5,911   6,683   7,426 

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’SMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Royal Gold, together with its subsidiaries, is engaged in the business of acquiring and managing precious metals royalties. Royalties are passive (non-operating) interests in mining projects that provide the right to revenue or production from the project after deducting specified costs, if any. We seek to acquire existing royalties or to finance projects that are in production or in development stage in exchange for royaltyroyalties or similar interests. We are engaged in a continual review of opportunities to acquire existing royalties, to create new royalties or similar interests through the financing of mine development or exploration, or to acquire companies that hold royalties. We currently, and generally at any time, have acquisition opportunities in various stages of active review, including, for example, our engagement of consultants and advisors to analyze particular opportunities, analysis of technical, financial and other confidential information, submission of indications of interest, participation in preliminary discussions and involvement as a bidder in competitive auctions.

The

        As of June 30, 2010, the Company owns royalties on 2533 producing properties, 823 development stage properties and over 80130 exploration stage properties, of which the Company considers 2537 to be


Table of Contents


evaluation stage projects. The Company uses “evaluation stage”"evaluation stage" to describe exploration stage properties that contain mineralized material and on which operators are engaged in the search for reserves. We do not conduct mining operations nor are we required to contribute to capital costs, exploration costs, environment costs or other operatingmining costs on the properties in which we hold royalty interests. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, we focused on the management of our existing royalty interests, the acquisition of royalty interests, the acquisition and integration of IRC and the creation of royalty interests through financing and strategic exploration alliances.

financing.

Our financial results are primarily tied to the price of gold, silver, copper and other metals, as well as production from our producing stage royalty interests. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, theThe price of gold, averaged $874, $821 and $638 per ounce, respectively, the price of silver, averaged $12.91, $15.40 and $12.74 per ounce, respectively, and the price of copper averaged $2.25, $3.53 and $3.22 per pound, respectively. The price of gold and other metals have fluctuated widely in recent years. The marketability and the price of gold, silver, copper and other metals are influenced by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company and may have a material and adverse effect on the Company’sCompany's results of operations and financial condition.

        For the fiscal yearyears ended June 30, 2010, 2009 Royal Gold derived 84%and 2008, gold, silver and copper price averages and percentage of its total revenue from gold royalties, 3% of its total revenue from silver royalties, 11% of its total revenue from copper royalties and 2% of its total revenue from otherroyalty revenues by metal royalties.were as follows:

The increase in the average gold price, production from the recently acquired Barrick royalty portfolio (notably Mulatos and Siguiri), an increase in production at Taparko and Leeville, and commencement of production at Peñasquito and Dolores, contributed to royalty revenue of $73.8 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, compared to royalty revenue of $66.3 million during the fiscal
 
 Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2009 June 30, 2008 
Metal
 Average
Price
 Percentage
of Royalty
Revenue
 Average
Price
 Percentage
of Royalty
Revenue
 Average
Price
 Percentage
of Royalty
Revenue
 

Gold ($/ounce)

 $1,089  81%$874  84%$821  74%

Silver ($/ounce)

 $16.85  3%$12.91  3%$15.40  3%

Copper ($/pound)

 $3.03  9%$2.25  11%$3.53  23%

Other

  N/A  7% N/A  2% N/A  0%

45


year ended June 30, 2008. The increase in our royalty revenue during fiscal year 2009 was partially offset due to a decrease in production and a reduction in our GSR2 royalty rate (as part of the Barrick transaction discussed below) at Cortez and a decrease in production and negative provisional pricing adjustments at Robinson.
Please see Part I, Item 1, Business, and Part I, Item 2, Properties, of this report for discussion of Royal Gold’sGold's producing, development stage and exploration stage royalty interests.

Recent Developments

Please also see the “Liquidity"Liquidity and Capital Resources”Resources" section below within this Item 7 for discussion of our equity offering, credit facility amendmentnew term loan and other recent liquidity and capital developments.

Business Developments

Proposed Acquisition of Andacollo Production InterestGold Stream on the Mt. Milligan Project

On April July 15, 2010, Royal Gold entered into a letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement") pursuant to which it agreed to acquire 25% of the payable gold produced from the Mt. Milligan copper-gold project in British Columbia from Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. or its affiliate ("Thompson Creek") concurrent with the closing of Thompson Creek's proposed acquisition (the "Acquisition") of Terrane Metals Corp. ("Terrane"). The terms and conditions under which Royal Gold will acquire the payable gold are contained in a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Purchase and Sale Agreement") among Royal Gold, Thompson Creek and a subsidiary of each entity to be identified prior to the closing of the Acquisition. The obligation of Royal Gold and Thompson Creek to enter into the Purchase and Sale Agreement is subject to certain customary conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement. Under the Letter Agreement, Thompson Creek and Royal Gold have each agreed to an exclusivity arrangement with the other party in respect to certain alternative gold-related financing transactions in connection with the Mt. Milligan project until the closing of the Acquisition or earlier termination of the Letter Agreement in accordance with its terms. The Letter Agreement also contains representations and warranties and covenants in respect of Royal Gold and Thompson Creek.


Table of Contents

        Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, at the closing of the Acquisition, Royal Gold will make a payment of $226.5 million to Thompson Creek, which will be used to pay a portion of the consideration to shareholders of Terrane in connection with the Acquisition. Thereafter, upon satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Purchase and Sale Agreement, Royal Gold will make additional payments (each, an "Additional Payment") to Thompson Creek in an amount not to exceed $85 million in the aggregate to fund a portion of the development costs of the Mt. Milligan project. Upon commencement of production at the Mt. Milligan project, Royal Gold will purchase 25% of the payable gold with a cash payment equal to the lesser of $400 or the prevailing market price for each payable ounce of gold until 550,000 ounces have been delivered to Royal Gold and the lesser of $450 or the prevailing market price for each additional ounce thereafter. The Purchase and Sale Agreement also contains representations and warranties, covenants, conditions and indemnification provisions in respect of each party. The Company anticipates funding this transaction with cash on hand.

        The Acquisition has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both Thompson Creek and Terrane. Goldcorp, which owns 52% of Terrane's fully diluted shares (including preference shares), has agreed to convert its preference shares into common shares and vote in favor of the Acquisition. Completion of the Acquisition is subject to, among other things, the favorable vote of 662/3 2009, of the Terrane equity shareholders at a special meeting called to approve the Acquisition, which is expected to occur in September 2010. In addition, certain officers and directors holding approximately 1.0% of Terrane's common shares in the aggregate have entered into support agreements in favor of the transaction.

        The Mt. Milligan project is in the early stage of construction, and Terrane has announced that production is expected to commence in calendar year 2013. Terrane has reported that proven and probable reserves total 482 million tonnes (0.20% copper; 0.39 g/t gold), containing 2.1 billion pounds of copper and 6.0 million ounces of gold. Terrane expects the reserves to support a mine life of at least 22 years and estimates Mt. Milligan will produce approximately 262,000 ounces of gold annually during the first six years of operation and 195,000 ounces of gold annually over the life of the mine. Mt. Milligan has received an Environmental Assessment Certificate and a Mines Act Permit from the Province of British Columbia and the Environmental Assessment approval from the Government of Canada. Terrane has also secured long lead-time equipment and has entered into an engineering, procurement and construction management contract with an AMEC-Fluor joint venture.

Acquisition of Additional Royalty Interests at Pascua-Lama

        On July 1, 2010, the Company entered into two separate assignment of rights agreements with two private Chilean citizens whereby Royal Gold acquired the right to acquire an additional 0.75% NSR sliding-scale royalty on the Pascua-Lama project, which is owned and operated by Barrick and located on the border between Argentina and Chile, for a definitivepurchase price of $53 million. Of this amount, $25 million was paid to immediately acquire an additional 0.35% royalty interest. A deferred payment of $28 million is expected to be made on or before October 29, 2010, to acquire the remaining 0.40% royalty interest. In addition, on April 23, 2010, Royal Gold entered into an assignment of rights agreement (“Master Agreement”with another private Chilean citizen whereby Royal Gold acquired an additional 0.25% NSR on the project for a purchase price of $15 million. Once the deferred closing occurs, Royal Gold's total gold royalty interest in the Pascua-Lama project will increase to 5.23% NSR, at gold prices above $800 per ounce. Pursuant to the assignment of rights agreements, Royal Gold also acquired a 0.20% fixed-rate copper royalty that takes effect after January 1, 2017, increasing Royal Gold's copper royalty interest in the Pascua-Lama project to 1.05%.


Table of Contents

        In addition, Royal Gold has obtained certain contingent rights and reduced certain obligations with respect to the portion of the Pascua-Lama royalty acquired in the IRC Transaction. Upon completion of the deferred payment as mentioned above, we will have (i) reduced the contingent payments from $10.4 million to $8.4 million due from Royal Gold to certain individuals who held the royalty if gold prices exceed $600 per ounce for any six month period during the first 36 months of commercial production from the project, and (ii) decreased payments due from Royal Gold to these individuals from $6.4 million to $4.4 million that would be required to extend 24% of our royalty interest beyond 14 million ounces of production from the project. Royal Gold also increased its interest in two one-time payments from $0.5 million to $1.5 million which are payable by Barrick upon the achievement of certain production thresholds at Pascua-Lama.

Acquisition of International Royalty Corporation

        On February 22, 2010, Royal Gold and IRC consummated their previously announced Plan of Arrangement (the "Plan of Arrangement"), whereby Royal Gold, through RG Exchangeco, acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of IRC. Pursuant to the Plan of Arrangement, IRC shareholders received, in the aggregate: (i) cash consideration of approximately $350 million, (ii) 5,234,086 common shares of Royal Gold, and (iii) 1,806,649 Exchangeable Shares, which are convertible at any time on a one-for-one basis for common shares of Royal Gold.

        The IRC royalty portfolio included 11 producing royalties, 10 development stage royalties, 24 evaluation stage royalties and 35 exploration stage royalties as of February 22, 2010. The producing royalties acquired from IRC generated royalty revenue of approximately $9.0 million from February 22, 2010, the date we acquired IRC, through June 30, 2010. The key royalty assets acquired from IRC include the following:

        Pascua-Lama—A 0.47% to 3.15% sliding-scale NSR gold royalty on the Chilean portion of the Pascua-Lama project, which is operated by Barrick. The Company also acquired a 0.63% fixed rate copper royalty on the Chilean portion of the Pascua-Lama project which is effective January 1, 2017. The Pascua-Lama project is currently under construction and is classified as a development stage royalty interest on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. Barrick has estimated commissioning in late calendar 2012 and production in early calendar 2013;

        Voisey's Bay—An effective 2.7% NSR royalty on the Voisey's Bay nickel-copper-cobalt mine located in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada and operated by Vale. The Company owns 90% of a 3.0% NSR (or 2.7%) withroyalty while a Chileannon-controlling interest owns the remainder. The Company recognized approximately $3.9 million (which includes approximately $0.4 million of non-controlling interests) in royalty revenue from the Voisey's Bay royalty for the period February 22, 2010 through June 30, 2010;

        Inata—A 2.5% GSR royalty on the Inata gold mine located in northern Burkina Faso, West Africa and operated by a subsidiary of Teck Resources Limited (“Teck”), CDA,Avocet Mining PLC. Production at Inata began during the fourth quarter of calendar 2009, and the Company recognized approximately $1.3 million in royalty revenue from the Inata royalty for the period February 22, 2010 through June 30, 2010;

        Las Cruces—A 1.5% NSR royalty on the Las Cruces copper project located in Andalusia, Spain and operated by Inmet Mining. The Company recognized approximately $0.9 million in royalty revenue from the Las Cruces royalty for the period February 22, 2010 through June 30, 2010;

        Western Australia—A 1.5% NSR royalty on gold produced from approximately three million acres in Western Australia. The primary producing operations covered by the 1.5% NSR royalty are Southern Cross, Gwalia Deeps and South Laverton. The Company recognized approximately $2.3 million in royalty revenue from the producing Western Australian royalties for the period February 22, 2010 through June 30, 2010; and


Table of Contents

        Wolverine—A 0.00% to acquire9.45% sliding-scale NSR royalty on all gold and silver production from the Wolverine sulfide project located in Yukon Territory, Canada, and operated by Yukon Zinc.

        Please refer to Note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further discussion on the IRC Transaction.

Acquisition of Andacollo Royalty

        On January 25, 2010, the Company acquired an interest in the gold produced from the sulfide portion of the Andacollo project in Chile (the “Andacollo Production Interest”).from a Chilean subsidiary of Teck. The purchase price for the Andacollo Production Interest consistsRoyalty consisted of $217.9 million in cash and 1,204,136 of the Company’sCompany's common shares.

The Andacollo Production Interest will equalRoyalty equals 75% of the gold produced from the sulfide portion of the deposit at the Andacollo mine until 910,000 payable ounces of gold have been sold, and 50% of the gold produced in excess of 910,000 payable ounces of gold. The mine, located about 34 miles southeast of the city of La Serena, Chile, produces copper from the oxide portion of the deposit and Teck is currently constructing facilities to produce both copper and gold from the sulfide portion of the deposit. The Andacollo Production Interest will not cover copper production.

Proven and probable reserves, as estimated by the operator as of December 31, 2008, for the sulfide portion are 393.5 million tonnes (433.7 million tons) with a grade of 0.39% copper and 0.13 g/t (0.004 ozs/ton) gold. This equates to 1.6 million contained ounces of gold. Reserves were estimated using a copper price of $1.50 per pound and a gold price of $480 per ounce. Gold will be produced as a by-product of copper production, with a gold recovery rate estimated by the operator to be approximately 61%. The Andacollo Royalty will not cover copper production.

        Once the mine is in full production, the operator expects the mill to have a capacity of 55,000 tonnes (60,630 tons) per day. The operator estimates that the mine will produce on average approximately 53,00055,000 ounces of gold and 76,00080,000 tonnes (83,775(88,185 tons) of copper in concentrate annually for the first 10ten years of commercial production, with an estimated mine life of 20 years. The mineOre has been introduced to the mill and shipments of copper concentrate commenced in early May 2010. Full commercial production is estimatedexpected to begin initial production of goldbe reached in the fourth quarter of calendar 2009, with commercial production at the mine to be achieved in the first half of calendar year 2010, unless this schedule is delayed by challenges to previously granted permits relating to CDA’s water supply, as recently announced by Teck.

On August 12, 2009, Teck announced that they have encountered challenges to the previously granted permits for the process water supply, which may result in a delay in the start-up of the sulfide milling operations. Royal Gold’s obligation to close the Teck Transaction is subject to CDA’s completion of concentrate marketing for a specified percentage of its concentrate production from the Andacollo mine, the condition that CDA’s material government approvals are not withdrawn or challenged, and completion of certain limited due diligence satisfactory to Royal Gold, as well as other customary closing conditions. To accommodate the potential delay in the start-up of the sulfide milling operations, we have agreed to extend the outside closing date of the Teck Transaction. As such, either party may terminate the definitive agreement if the closing conditions are not met by January 29, 2010.

46


Please also see Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors —Additional risks that Royal Gold may face as a result of the Teck Transaction...,for further discussion on potential risks associated with the Teck Transaction.
Acquisition of Barrick Royalty Portfolio
Effective October 1, 2008, the Company completed its acquisition of royalties from Barrick for cash of approximately $181.3 million, including a restructuring of the Company’s GSR2, GSR3 and NVR1 royalties at Cortez, valued at $31.5 million, for net cash of approximately $150 million. The transactions were completed pursuant to the Royalty Purchase and Sale Agreement (“the Agreement”) dated July 30, 2008. The cash portion of the purchase price for the transaction was paid from the Company’s cash on hand.
Pursuant to the Barrick transaction, we acquired royalties on 72 properties in various stages of production, development, evaluation and exploration.
The restructuring of Royal Gold’s royalty positions at Cortez consisted of: (1) a reduction of the Company’s GSR2 sliding-scale royalty (ranging from 0.72% to 9.0%) to match the current GSR1 sliding-scale royalty rate (ranging from 0.40% to 5.0%) and (2) the elimination of Royal Gold’s interest in the 0.71% GSR3 royalty and the 0.39% NVR1 royalty on the mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit. The GSR3 and NVR1 royalties that cover areas outside the Crossroads deposit at Cortez were not affected by this transaction. The Crossroads deposit continues to be subject to the Company’s GSR2 royalty at the sliding-scale rate of 0.4% to 5.0%.
The royalty portfolio acquired from Barrick has generated approximately $12.2 million in royalty revenue from the completion of the acquisition of the Barrick royalty portfolio on October 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. The key assets in the Barrick royalty portfolio include the following properties:
Mulatos— A sliding-scale NSR royalty currently paying 3.5% on Alamos’ Mulatos mine. Prior to October 1, 2008, we owned a 0.30% to 1.50% sliding-scale NSR royalty on the property. This acquisition consolidated the Mulatos royalty and increased our royalty interest to a 1.0% to 5.0% sliding-scale NSR royalty. At current commodity prices, the Mulatos royalty is 5.0%. As a result of the acquisition, the Company recognized approximately $3.9 million in additional royalty from completion of the acquisition of the Barrick royalty portfolio on October 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. The royalty is capped at 2.0 million gold ounces of production and approximately 416,000 cumulative gold ounces have been produced through June 30, 2009;
Canadian Malartic— A 2.0% to 3.0% sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Canadian Malartic gold project, owned by Osisko. Osisko announced the completion of a positive feasibility study resulting in proven and probable reserves of 202 million tons of ore, at a grade of 0.031 ounces per ton, containing 6.28 million ounces of gold, of which 4.7 million is subject to our royalty interest. Osisko estimated that gold production over the life of the mine will be approximately 591,000 ounces annually. The royalty is subject to a buy-down right and is classified as a development stage royalty interest on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. If the buy-down right is exercised by Osisko for $1.0 million to $1.5 million, the sliding-scale NSR royalty would be reduced to 1.0%-1.5%;
Siguiri— A sliding-scale NSR royalty currently paying 1.875% on the Siguiri gold mine in Guinea, West Africa, operated by AngloGold Ashanti. The Company recognized approximately $4.0 million since the acquisition of the Barrick royalty portfolio on October 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. The royalty is capped on a dollar basis and approximately $7.9 million remains under the cap as of June 30, 2009; and

47


Holt— A sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Holt portion of the Holloway-Holt mining project located in Ontario, Canada and owned 100% by St Andrew. The sliding-scale NSR royalty rate applicable to gold production from the Holt mine was recently judicially determined to be calculated by multiplying 0.00013 by the quarterly average gold price. For example, at a quarterly average gold price of $950 per ounce, the effective royalty rate payable would be 12.35%.
Please refer to Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the acquisition of the Barrick royalty portfolio.
Amended and Restated Credit Facility
On October 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with HSBC Bank USA National Association (“HSBC Bank”), Scotiabanc Inc. (“Scotiabanc”), and The Bank of Nova Scotia (“Bank of Nova Scotia”) which, among other things, increased the Company’s existing credit facility from $80 million to $125 million and extended the maturity date to October 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2009, the Company did not have any amounts outstanding under the credit facility. Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below within this MD&A for further discussion on the Credit Agreement.
Property Developments

Taparko

The Taparko mine commenced gold production in August 2007 and has contributed approximately $17.9$50.0 million in royalty revenue (from TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2)TB-GSR2, collectively) since production commenced. Reserve characteristics, mining activity, and gold recovery performance has been near feasibility study estimates. However, mill performance has suffered since start-up due to problems associated with the grinding mill drive-train and production ceased on June 11, 2008. A new gear box to correct the mill problems was installed on October 29, 2008, and operations at Taparko re-commenced on November 4, 2008. Although improved, elevated vibrations in certain elements of the mill drive train are still a concern for potential interruptions to sustained production. Despite the mill problems for much of the first half of fiscal year 2009, goldGold sales at Taparko for the fiscal yearyears ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 were approximately 118,000 ounces and 48,000 ounces, comparedrespectively. The increase in gold sales during the period was attributable to improved mill throughput, mill availability, grade and recoveries. As of June 30, 2010, we have recognized royalty revenue associated with the TB-GSR1 royalty totaling $30.6 million, which is attributable to cumulative production of approximately 36,000202,000 ounces of gold. Management estimates that, based on Taparko's last three quarters of production and its calendar 2010 production guidance, the $35 million cap associated with TB-GSR1 could be met during fiscal year 2008.

the third calendar quarter of 2010. Upon achieving the $35 million cap, the TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2 royalties will terminate and the 2.0% GSR royalty (TB-GSR3) will become effective. The TB-GSR3 royalty covers all gold produced from the Taparko mine.

Somita SA (“Somita”("Somita"), a 90% owned subsidiary of High River and the operator of Taparko, is in breach of certain obligations under the Amended and Restated Funding Agreement dated February 22, 2006 (the “Funding Agreement”"Funding Agreement") between Royal Gold, Inc. and Somita. Royal Gold has invested $35 million for the development of the Taparko mine under the Funding Agreement. As security for the Company’sCompany's investment in Somita, two of High River’sRiver's subsidiaries have pledged their equity interests in Somita and High River (West Africa) Ltd., the corporate parent of Somita. TheThis pledge will remain in effect until certain production and performance standards have been attained at the Taparko mine.mine, sufficient to satisfy the Completion Test, as defined in the Funding Agreement. The Completion Test commenced on December 1, 2009, and continued for 90 days. The results of the Completion Test have been reported to the Company and are currently under review by management. If management determines that Somita has satisfied the requirements of the Completion Test, the pledge of the equity


Table of Contents


interests in Somita and its corporate parent (High River (West Africa) Ltd.) will terminate and this security will be released.

        In addition, Royal Gold obtained as collateral a pledge of shares of certain equity investments in public companies held by High River. The fair market value of the pledged shares, based on June 30, 2010 closing price, is approximately $32.1 million as of June 30, 2009.$72.9 million. The Company’sCompany's carrying value of its royalty interests at Taparko was approximately $24.3$5.8 million as of June 30, 2009.2010. The collateralpledge of High River's equity investments will remain in effect until project completion and attainmentthe satisfaction of certain production or performance standards atrequirements as provided in the Taparko mine.construction contract between Somita and its construction contractor, so long as there are no outstanding claims by the Company against the pledged securities.

        Royal Gold has not agreed to forbear pursuing any of its remedies under the Funding Agreement or other agreements with High River and its affiliates.

On November 21, 2008, High River announced the closing of an equity financing with Lybica Holding B.V., an affiliate of ZAO Severstal Resources, the mining division of OAO Severstal (“Severstal”). As a result of the equity financing, Severstal indirectly holds approximately 53% of High River common stock.

48


High River subsequently announced that its ability to continue as a going concern depends on, among other things, its ongoing discussions with its lenders and obtaining additional financing. On June 24, 2009, Severstal announced its offer, which was recommended by the independent directors of High River’s board of directors, to acquire the remaining outstanding shares of High River common stock. Severstal increased its offer on June 28, 2009, and declared it full and final, not to be extended beyond August 10, 2009. On August 11, 2009, Severstal announced that its take-over bid has expired and following the offer, Severstal will own, directly and through affiliates, 61.7% of High River.
Cortez
The restructuring of the GSR2 royalty, from a range of 0.72% to 9.0%, to match the current GSR1 sliding-scale rate, which ranges from 0.40% to 5.0%, along with a decrease in production at Cortez, resulted in a decrease in royalty revenue of approximately $1.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in

        Higher royalty revenue at Cortez was primarily due to a decrease in production. While lower than expected grades were mined during much of our fiscal year 2009, decreased production was driven primarily by mine sequencing that reduced mining activity on the Company’s royalty ground at Cortez.

Robinson
Pursuant to the Robinson royalty agreement, our 3.0% NSR royalty is based upon revenue received by the operator of the mine, Quadra, for the sale of minerals from the Robinson mine, reduced by certain costs incurred by Quadra. Quadra’s concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, in general, provide for a provisional payment based upon assays and quoted metal prices at the date of shipment. Final true up payments are subsequently based upon final assays and market metal prices set on a specified future date. Under current sales contracts between Quadra and its third party smelters, final pricing for copper sales is generally set at least four months after the date of shipment.
Royal Gold recognizes royalty revenue based on amounts contractually due pursuant to the calculations above for the underlying sale. In the event there are significant pricing variations between the provisional and final settlement periods in copper, and to a lesser extent, gold and silver, royalty revenue recognized by the Company on the Robinson royalty will be positively or negatively impacted.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, we recognized approximately $7.7 million in royalty revenue at Robinson compared to $16.6 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. This decrease in royalty revenue was attributable to a decrease in copper prices, a decrease in copper sales and negative final pricing adjustments. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the average price of copper was $2.25 and $3.53 per pound, respectively, while the average price of copper during the three months ended December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, was $1.79 and $3.49, respectively. This significant decrease in the price of copper during our first and second fiscal quarters of 2009 resulted in Quadra having significant negative final pricing adjustments during our secondthird fiscal quarter of 2009. Furthermore, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, copper sales at Robinson were approximately 128.3 million pounds compared to 139.0 million pounds during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, which also resulted in2010 was offset by lower royalty revenue forin the period.
The negative final pricing adjustments impacted our royalty revenue by approximately $0.2 million and $3.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Royal

49


Gold may be subject to negative (or positive) pricing adjustments in future periods depending on the price of copper at the time of settlement when compared to the price of copper at the shipment date.
Also, during our fourth fiscal quarter of 2009, Quadra reduced their annual guidance for copper production from 140 million pounds to 130 million pounds. Quadra did not change their gold production guidance from earlier estimates. Quadra announced that the reduction in estimated copper production is2010, due to limitedthe allocation of ore sourced from Cortez Hills, which is outside the area subject to our royalty interests. As the focus of production shifts to Cortez Hills, the production related to our royalty interests will continue to decline. With this operating plan, Barrick expects approximately 240,000 ounces of gold to be produced from the Company's royalty interest during calendar 2010 compared to approximately 362,000 ounces of gold produced in calendar 2009.

Robinson

        Production at Robinson was reduced during much of the first half of calendar 2010 as access to hyopgene ore in the Veteran Pit was restricted due to high-wall instability which adversely affected blending capabilities. Quadra expects mining of the hypogene ore to resumeoccurred in the thirdsecond quarter of calendar 2009 allowing continuation2009. Full access has been re-established as of August 2010. Quadra also reported that additional flotation cells are fully operational and concentrate contracts have been re-negotiated to allow for more flexibility with respect to concentrate grades. In August 2010, Quadra reduced its 2010 annual production guidance at Robinson to 115-125 million pounds of copper from 135 million pounds and approximately 75,000 ounces of gold from 80,000 ounces as Quadra has encountered larger than anticipated historical underground workings.

Siguiri

        Our royalty at Siguiri is subject to a dollar cap of approximately $12.0 million. As of June 30, 2010, approximately $1.8 million remains under the cap. Based on historical production at Siguiri, the Company expects to reach the dollar cap during the second half of calendar 2010. Due to the expected achievement of the blending strategy.

dollar cap, the Company no longer considers the Siguiri royalty principal to its business.

Mulatos

On August 6, 2009,

        In March 2010, Alamos reported an increase to their 2009 production guidance to between 160,000 and 170,000 ounces from between 145,000 and 160,000 ounces. Theannounced a 17% increase in reported productionproven and probable reserves at Mulatos and plans to increase crusher throughput by up to 20% by the fourth quarter of calendar 2010. A closed circuit crushing system was the result of higher than planned recoveries,installed recently which was dueis also expected to operational improvements.

improve recovery.

Peñasquito

In May 2008,

        Royalty revenue at Peñasquito poured the first gold from the oxide circuit and the Company recognized approximately $1.5 million in royalty revenue from the oxide circuit during fiscal year 2009.2010 reflects combined oxide and sulfide production of gold, silver, lead and zinc. In June, Goldcorp reported that mechanical completion of the second sulfide processing line ("Line 2") had been achieved ahead of the previously expected third


Table of Contents


calendar quarter completion date. Line 2 is now in the commissioning phase and ramping up toward designed 50,000 tonne-per-day (55,115 tons) capacity. The first sulfide processing line ("Line 1") is regularly operating at designed production levels of 50,000 tonnes (55,115 tons) per day and declaration of commercial production remains on schedule for the third calendar quarter of 2010. Construction of the 30,000 tonne-per-day (33,069 tons) high pressure grinding roll circuit is on track for completion in the fourth calendar quarter of 2010 with full production ramp-up to the planned 130,000 tonne per day capacity to be reached in early calendar 2011.

Voisey's Bay

        As part of the IRC Transaction, the Company acquired an effective 2.7% NSR royalty on the Voisey's Bay property, which is operated by Vale and located in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Monthly production capacity at Voisey's Bay is approximately 7.0 million pounds of nickel and 5.6 million pounds of copper. Since August 1, 2009, about 200 workers at Voisey's Bay have been on strike. On July 13, 2009, Goldcorp announcedMarch 12, 2010, Vale reported that it commenced commissioninghad resumed production from the Voisey's Bay Ovoid mine and mill, which supplies nickel concentrate to Vale's operations at Thompson and Sudbury and copper concentrates to clients in Europe. The Voisey's Bay site is reported to be operating two weeks on, two weeks off, producing approximately 3.5 million pounds of nickel and 2.8 million pounds of copper per month. As of early August 2010, the strike at Voisey's Bay has not been resolved. Vale is currently operating at about 40% of capacity and is working on ramping up to full production.

Dolores

        Minefinders reported that production at Dolores was lower during the second calendar of 2010 due to lower grades. Minefinders expects production to increase through the second half of calendar 2010 due to increasing grades, completion of tertiary screen repairs and loading of ore onto the phase 2 leach pad beginning in late August 2010.

Las Cruces

        Inmet's Las Cruces copper operation in Spain continues to experience difficulties as they start-up. Inmet has reported that a number of equipment failures and operational issues delayed the ramp-up of the first sulfide circuitplant and limited the ability to operate continuously. Beginning in July 2010, Inmet has been focused on increasing available plant capacity and reducing the causes of equipment failures. Inmet expects their 70% interest to reach commercialyield 20,000 to 30,000 tonnes of copper cathode this year.

Pascua-Lama

        Barrick has reported that detailed engineering and procurement is nearing completion and the project is on track to enter production during the first quarter of calendar 2010. The sulfide portion2013. Barrick stated that major, long lead items have been ordered and the Barriales Camp in Chile is currently classifiedessentially complete. Roadwork is progressing well and about three million tons have been moved as a development stage royalty interest.

part of initial earthworks.

DoloresCanadian Malartic

Minefinders had their first

        Osisko reported that the Canadian Malartic gold project is advancing well and silver productionestimates that the project will be fully operational during the fourthsecond quarter of calendar 2008.2011, with average annual gold production of 630,000 ounces.


Table of Contents

Wolverine

        Yukon Zinc is completing the construction of its operating plan and facilities at the Wolverine mine. The Company’s 1.25% NSR royalty appliedprimary focus includes commissioning of all equipment and the ore processing circuits, as well as completing construction priorities to gold sales duringmove the period. The Company’s 2.0% NSR royalty at Dolores became effective once the facility reached 75% of commercialmine into production. Minefinders announced that it achieved commercial production at Dolores effective May 1, 2009, thus making the Company’s 2.0% NSR effective from May 1, 2009. The Company recognized approximately $0.9 million in royalty revenue on its Dolores royalties during fiscal year 2009. In July 2009, Minefinders stated that both gold and silver production are expectedYukon Zinc expects ore to continue to increase through the remainder of calendar year 2009 as the volume of ore under leach and time under leach continues to increase.

Troy
As of June 30, 2009 the $10.5 million cap on the 7.0% GSR royalty at Troy was met. As such, the royalty will cease providing revenuebe fed to the Company effective June 30, 2009. However, the operator of the Troy mine, Revett, ismill in arrears on its GSR royalty obligation to the Company by approximately $1.5 million as of June 30, 2009. The Company continues to have discussions with Revett regarding its delinquent payment status but has determined the receivable to be collectible as of June 30, 2009. In addition, Revett recently announced substantial doubt regarding its ability to continue as a going concern. Revett continues to have discussions with its customers and suppliers, including us, in an effort to manage its cash flows.
Benso
In May 2009, Golden Star Resources Ltd. (“Golden Star”) exercised its right of repurchase on the Benso 1.5% NSR royalty held by the Company for $3.4 million. The Company acquired the Benso royalty in December 2007 for approximately $1.9 million. The Company’s net book value for the Benso royalty on the date of exercise by Golden Star was approximately $1.2 million. As such, the Company recognized a gain of approximately $2.2 million upon exercise. The gain is included withinRoyalty portfolio restructuring gainon the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as of June 30, 2009.
Pascua-Lama
Barrick announced on May 7, 2009, that Pascua-Lama will proceed to construction. Barrick has received key construction permits and environmental approvals, and the governments of Chile and Argentina have reached a fiscal agreement regarding mine operations. Barrick expects commissioning in late 2012 with production in early 2013. Barrick has announced forecasted average annual production of between 750,000 and 800,000 ounces of gold in the first five years of production.

50

September 2010.


Holt
On October 1, 2008, as part of the Company’s acquisition of a portfolio of royalties from Barrick, we acquired a royalty on a portion of the development stage Holloway-Holt mining project in Ontario, Canada, owned by St Andrew. St Andrew succeeded Newmont Canada as owner of the Holloway-Holt mining project in November 2006. By virtue of the Company’s acquisition of Barrick’s royalty portfolio, RGLD Gold Canada, Inc. succeeded Barrick as the royalty payee under the royalty agreement.
On or about November 3, 2008, St Andrew filed an action in the Onrario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) seeking, among other things, declarations by the Court that St Andrew’s obligation in respect of the royalty is limited to only a portion of the total royalty payable, and that any additional royalty obligations under the royalty agreement remain the responsibility of Newmont Canada. Newmont Canada responded that St Andrew is responsible for all royalty obligations under the royalty agreement.
Barrick and Royal Gold were joined as necessary parties to the litigation in January 2009. Trial concerning calculation of the royalty and the party or parties responsible for paying it was held from January 30, 2009 to February 12, 2009. On July 23, 2009, the Court held that Royal Gold is entitled to payment from Newmont Canada of the full amount of the sliding-scale NSR royalty on gold produced from the Holt mine. The Court also held that St Andrew’s sole obligation is to reimburse Newmont Canada for payment of the royalty up to a flat rate of 0.013% of the net smelter returns for gold, silver and other metals. The Court’s decision may be appealed within 30 days of the date of decision.
The Holt royalty is currently classified as a development stage royalty interest and the Company does not currently receive revenue from the royalty.
Operators’Operators' Production Estimates by Royalty for Calendar Year 2009
2010

We received production estimates from the operators of our producing mines during the first calendar quarter of 2009.2010. The following table shows such production estimates for our principal producing properties for calendar year 20092010 as well as the actual production reported to us by the various operators for the six months ended June 30, 2009.2010. The estimates and production reports are prepared by the operators of the mining properties. We do not participate in the preparation or calculation of the operators’operators' estimates or production reports and have not independently assessed or verified the accuracy of such information.

51


Operators’Operators' Production Estimate by Royalty for Calendar Year 20092010 and Reported Production
Principal Producing Properties
For the period January 1, 20092010 through June 30, 20092010
Principal Producing Properties

                         
  Calendar Year 2009 Operator’s Reported Production through
  Production Estimate(1) June 30, 2009(2)
  Gold Silver Copper Gold Silver Copper
Royalty (oz.) (oz.) (lbs.) (oz.) (oz.) (lbs.)
Cortez GSR1  345,296         133,342       
Cortez GSR2(3)
  614         8,884       
Cortez GSR3(3)
  345,910         142,226       
Cortez NVR1(3)
  72,863         73,252       
Robinson(4)
  100,000     130 million  53,409     58.7 million
Leeville  426,212         183,625       
Goldstrike  440,879         263,802       
Peñasquito(5)
  70,000  2.3 million     37,992  1.5 million   
Mulatos(6)
  170,000         88,045       
Dolores  100,000  2.0 million     36,379   326,182    
Taparko(7)
  76,000         40,483       
Siguiri  300,000         160,387       
 
 Calendar 2010 Operator's Production
Estimate(1)
 Reported Production through
June 30, 2010(2)
 
Royalty
 Gold
(oz.)
 Silver
(oz.)
 Base Metals
(lbs.)
 Gold
(oz.)
 Silver
(oz.)
 Base Metals
(lbs.)
 

Andacollo(3)

  30,000        4,145     

Cortez(4) GSR1

  241,000      136,805     

Cortez GSR2

        952     

Cortez GSR3

  241,000      137,757     

Cortez NVR1

  188,000      110,519     

Dolores(4,5)

  91,000  2.3 million    34,853  0.5 million   

Gwalia Deeps

  102,000        47,626     

Las Cruces(4)

                   
 

Copper

        161 million        20.8 million 

Leeville

  429,000      220,459     

Mulatos(4)

  160,000      74,586     

Peñasquito(4)

  180,000  13.4 million     66,944  5.3 million    
 

Lead

        107 million        34.1 million 
 

Zinc

        135 million        47.3 million 

Robinson(4)

  75,000       43,775      
 

Copper

        115 million        54.6 million 

Taparko(4)

  137,000      59,953     

Voisey's Bay(4,6)

                   
 

Copper

        N/A        8.6 million 
 

Nickel

        N/A        19.0 million 

(1)
There can be no assurance that production estimates received from our operators will be achieved. Please refer to our cautionary language regarding forward-looking statements following this MD&A, as well as the Risk Factors identified in Part I, Item 1A, of this report for information regarding factors that could affect actual results.

(2)
Reported production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our royalty interests, for the period January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010, as reported to us by the operators of the mines.

(1)There can be no assurance that production estimates received from our operators will be achieved. Please refer to our cautionary language regarding forward-looking statements following this MD&A, as well as the Risk Factors identified in Part I, Item 1A, of this report for information regarding factors that could affect actual results.
(2)Reported production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our royalty interests, for the period January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009, as reported to us by the operators of the mines.
(3)As part of the royalty acquisition transaction between Royal Gold and Barrick, as discussed above in this MD&A, the portion of the GSR3 and NVR1 royalties on the mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit at Cortez were eliminated. None of the production estimates shown are attributable to the Crossroads deposit, which is in development stage.
(4)Quadra recently announced that production guidance for copper has been reduced to 130 million pounds of copper from 140 million pounds of copper due to its limited access to hypogene ore in the Veteran pit, which adversely affected blending capabilities. Gold production guidance was unchanged from Quadra’s earlier estimates.
(5)Reported production estimate relates to the oxide circuit. The sulfide portion is classified as development stage royalty interest. Goldcorp estimates that the sulfide circuit will reach commercial production by the end of calendar 2009.
(6)On August 6, 2009, Alamos announced that estimated gold production has been increased to between 160,000 to 170,000 ounces from between 145,000 to 160,000. The increase in reported production was the result of higher than planned recoveries, which was due to operational improvements.
(7)The operator provided a calendar 2009 production range between 63,000 and 76,000 ounces.

52Table of Contents


    Please refer to "Recent Developments, Property Developments" earlier within this MD&A for further discussion on certain of our principal properties.

(3)
The operator estimates that the mine will produce on average approximately 55,000 ounces of gold in concentrate annually for the first ten years of commercial production. The production estimate shown represents the expected ramp-up of production, beginning April 2010, to commercial production.

(4)
Please refer to "Recent Developments, Property Developments" earlier within this MD&A for further discussion on updates at this property.

(5)
Minefinders estimates that calendar 2010 production for gold will be between 91,000 ounces and 100,500 ounces of gold, and silver production is estimated between 2.3 million ounces and 2.6 million ounces of silver.

(6)
The Company has not yet received calendar 2010 production guidance from the operator.

The following table discloses historical production for the past three fiscal years for the principal producing properties that are subject to our royalty interests, as reported to us by the operators of the mines:

Historical Production(1)Production(1) by Royalty
Principal Producing Properties
For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008
Principal Producing Properties

                 
Royalty Metal  2009  2008  2007 
Cortez GSR1 Gold 200,578 oz. 400,396 oz. 502,626 oz.
Cortez GSR2 Gold 67,749 oz. 35,752 oz. 7,647 oz.
Cortez GSR3 Gold 268,327 oz. 436,148 oz. 510,273 oz.
Cortez NVR1 Gold 154,399 oz. 127,198 oz. 291,963 oz.
Robinson Copper 128.3 million lbs. 139.0 million lbs. 116.9 million lbs.
Robinson Gold 113,740 oz. 120,873 oz. 80,603 oz.
Leeville Gold 429,122 oz. 360,811 oz. 230,458 oz.
Goldstrike Gold 724,368 oz. 698,488 oz. 950,462 oz.
Peñasquito (oxide) Gold 52,932 oz. N/A N/A
Peñasquito (oxide) Silver 2.5 million oz. N/A N/A
Mulatos Gold 167,907 oz. 120,933 oz. 103,262 oz.
Dolores Gold 38,819 oz. N/A N/A
Dolores Silver 326,182 oz. N/A N/A
Taparko Gold 48,105 oz. 36,078 oz. N/A
Siguiri Gold 241,817 oz. N/A N/A
Royalty
Metal201020092008
(1)

Andacollo

 Historical production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our royalty interests for each fiscal year presented, as reported to us by the operators of the mines.Gold4,145 oz.N/AN/A

Cortez GSR1

Gold355,513 oz.200,578 oz.400,396 oz.

Cortez GSR2

Gold2,082 oz.67,749 oz.35,752 oz.

Cortez GSR3

Gold357,595 oz.268,327 oz.436,148 oz.

Cortez NVR1

Gold259,741 oz.154,399 oz.127,198 oz.

Dolores

Gold73,463 oz.38,819 oz.N/A

Silver1.2 million oz.326,182 oz.N/A

Gwalia Deeps

Gold47,626 oz.N/AN/A

Las Cruces

Copper20.8 million lbs.N/AN/A

Leeville

Gold454,148 oz.429,122 oz.360,811 oz.

Mulatos

Gold164,954 oz.167,907 oz.120,933 oz.

Peñasquito

Gold117,963 oz.52,932 oz.N/A

Silver7.2 million oz.2.5 million oz.N/A

Lead36.7 million lbs.N/AN/A

Zinc48.5 million lbs.N/AN/A

Robinson

Gold86,101 oz.113,740 oz.120,873 oz.

Copper107.4 million lbs.128.3 million lbs.139.0 million lbs.

Taparko

Gold117,505 oz.48,105 oz.36,078 oz.

Voisey's Bay

Nickel19.0 million lbs.N/AN/A

Copper8.6 million lbs.N/AN/A

(1)
Historical production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our royalty interests for each fiscal year presented, as reported to us by the operators of the mines.

Critical Accounting Policies

Listed below are the accounting policies that the Company believes are critical to its financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions involved and the


Table of Contents


magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue or expense being reported. Please refer to Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion on recently adopted and issued accounting pronouncements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amountamounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Our most critical accounting estimates relate to our assumptions regarding future gold, silver, copper and other metal prices and the estimates of reserves and recoveries of third-party mine operators. We rely on reserve estimates reported by the operators on the properties in which we have royalty interests. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the potential impairments of long-lived assets and the ability to realize income tax benefits associated with deferred tax assets. These estimates and assumptions also affect the rate at which we charge depreciation, depletion and amortization to earnings. On an ongoing

53


basis, management evaluates these estimates and assumptions; however, actual amounts could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Royalty Interests in Mineral Properties

As of June 30, 2009, the net carrying value of royalty interests in mineral properties was approximately $456.0 million.

        Royalty interests in mineral properties include acquired royalty interests in production, stage, development stage and exploration stage properties. The fair valuecosts of acquired royalty interests in mineral properties are capitalized as tangible assets whenas such interests do not meet the definition of a financial asset under the FASB Statement of Financial AccountAccounting Standards (“SFAS”Codification ("ASC") No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125, or a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

guidance.

Acquisition costs of production and development stage royalty interests are depleted using the units of production method over the life of the mineral property, which is estimated using proven and probable reserves. Acquisition costs of royalty interests on exploration stage mineral properties, where there are no proven and probable reserves, are not amortized. At such time as the associated exploration stage mineral interests are converted to proven and probable reserves, the cost basis is amortized over the remaining life of the mineral property, using proven and probable reserves. The carrying values of exploration stage mineral interests are evaluated for impairment at such time as information becomes available indicating that the production will not occur in the future. Exploration costs are expensed when incurred.

Asset Impairment:

We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The recoverability of the carrying value of royalty interests in production and development stage mineral properties is evaluated based upon estimated future undiscounted net cash flows from each royalty interest property using estimates of proven and probable reserves and other relevant information received from the operators. We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying value of royalty interests in exploration stage mineral properties in the event of significant decreases in the price of gold, silver, copper and other metals, and whenever new information regarding the mineral properties is obtained from the operator indicating that production will not likely occur in the future thus affecting the future recoverability of our royalty interests. Impairments in the carrying value of each property are measured and recorded to the extent that the carrying value in each property exceeds its estimated fair value, which is generally calculated using estimated future discounted cash flows.


Table of Contents

Our estimates of gold, silver, copper and other metal prices, operator’soperator's estimates of proven and probable reserves related to our royalty properties, and operator’soperator's estimates of operating, capital and reclamation costs are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which may affect the recoverability of our investment in these royalty interests in mineral properties. Although we have made our best assessment of these factors based on current conditions, it is possible that changes could occur, which could adversely affect the net cash flows expected to be generated from these royalty interests.

Royalty Revenue

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, we recognized royalty revenue of approximately $73.8 million.

        Royalty revenue is recognized pursuant to guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,Revenue Recognition for Financial Statements. RevenueASC 605 and based upon amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying royalty agreement. Specifically, revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of the underlying royalty agreements subject to (i) the pervasive evidence of the existence of the arrangements; (ii) the risks and rewards having been transferred; (iii) the royalty being fixed or determinable; and (iv)

54


the collectability of the royalty being reasonably assured. For royalty payments received in gold, royalty revenue is recorded at the average spot price of gold for the period in which the royalty was earned.
Pursuant

        Revenue recognized pursuant to the Robinson royalty agreement royalty revenue from ouris based upon 3.0% NSR royalty is recognized based uponof revenue received by the operator of the mine, Quadra, for the sale of minerals from the Robinson mine, reduced by certain costs incurred by Quadra. Quadra’sQuadra's concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, in general, provide for a provisionalan initial sales price payment based upon provisional assays and quoted metal prices at the date of shipment. Final true uptrue-up sales price payments to Quadra are subsequently based upon final assaysassay and market metal prices set on a specified future date. Under current sales contracts between Quadra and its third party smelters, final pricing for copper sales is generally set at least fourdate, typically one to three months after the date the concentrate arrives at the third-party smelter (which generally occurs four to five months after the shipment date from the Robinson mine). We do not have all the key information regarding the terms of shipment.

the operator's smelter contracts, such as the terms of specific concentrate shipments to a smelter or quantities of metal or expected settlement arrangements at the time of an operator's shipment of concentrate.

        Each monthly payment from Quadra is typically a combination of revenue received by Quadra for provisional payments during the month and any upward or downward adjustments for final assays and commodity prices for earlier shipments. Whether the payment to Royal Gold recognizesis based on Quadra's revenue in the form of provisional or final payments, Royal Gold records royalty revenue and the corresponding receivable based on the monthly amounts contractually dueit receives from Quadra, as determined pursuant to the calculations aboveroyalty agreement. The royalty contract does not provide Royal Gold with rights or obligations to settle any final assay and commodity price adjustments with Quadra. Therefore, once a given monthly payment is received by Royal Gold it is not subject to later adjustment based on adjustments for assays or commodity prices. Under the underlying sale. In the event there are significant pricing variations between the provisional androyalty agreement, Quadra may include such final settlement periods in copper, and toadjustments as a lesser extent, gold and silver,component of future royalty revenue recognized by the Company on the Robinson royalty will be positively or negatively impacted.

payments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Overview

At June 30, 2009,2010, we had current assets of $318.7$371.3 million compared to current liabilities of $6.2$35.8 million for a current ratio of 5110 to 1. This compares to current assets of $211.0$318.7 million and current liabilities of $8.9$6.2 million at June 30, 2008,2009, resulting in a current ratio of approximately 2451 to 1. OurThe decrease in the Company's current ratio increased during the period primarilywas due to an increase in cash and equivalents,the Company's current portion of long-term debt, which was largely due to net proceeds received from the issuance of common stock related to our April 2009 equity offering, discussed below, of approximately $235.0 million as well as cash received during the fiscal year 2009 from royalty revenue of approximately $73.8 million. This increase in cash and equivalents was partially offset by net cash paid as part of the acquisition of the Barrick royalty portfolio of approximately $150.0 million, cash paid for common stock dividends of approximately $10.2 million and cash paid during the period for income taxes of approximately $23.3 million.

At June 30, 2009, our cash and equivalents as shown on the consolidated balance sheets were primarily held in money market accounts which are invested in United States treasury bills or United States treasury backed securities. We are not invested in auction rate securities. The Company has not experienced any losses related to these balances and management believes its credit risk to be minimal.
IRC Transaction.

As further discussed earlier within this MD&A under “Recent"Recent Developments, -BusinessBusiness Developments," on January 25, 2010, the Company entered into a Master Agreement with a Chilean subsidiarycompleted the purchase of Teck, CDA, to acquire the Andacollo Production Interest.Royalty. The purchase price for the Andacollo Production Interest, as adjusted based on our equity offering completed on April 14, 2009, consistsRoyalty consisted of $217.9 million in cash and 1,204,136 shares


Table of Contents


of the Company’s Common Stock.

Company's common stock. The cash portion of the purchase price was funded using cash on hand.

        Also as discussed earlier within this MD&A under "Recent Developments, Business Developments," on February 22, 2010, the Company completed the IRC Transaction. The purchase price for the IRC Transaction consisted of approximately $350.0 million in cash, 5,234,086 shares of Royal Gold common stock and 1,806,649 Exchangeable Shares, which are convertible on a one-for-one basis for Royal Gold common stock. The cash portion of the total purchase price was sourced from cash on hand, cash acquired in the acquisition and from committed credit facilities, pursuant to which we borrowed $225 million.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, liquidity needs were met from $73.8$136.6 million in royalty revenues (including $1.1$2.4 million of minority interest), net proceeds from issuance of common stock related to our April 2009 equity offering of approximately $235.0 millionnon-controlling interests) and our available cash resources.resources, including our credit facilities. Also during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, our total assets increased to $809.9 million$1.9 billion compared to $545.9$809.9 million at June 30, 2008.2009. The increase was primarily attributable to net cash proceeds received fromthe increase in our April 2009 equity offering of approximately $235.0 million and the preliminary allocation of approximately $181.3 million in royalty interests in mineral properties as partdue the IRC Transaction and the acquisition of the Barrick royalty portfolio acquisition.

55

Andacollo Royalty. The proceeds received from our June 2010 equity offering, as discussed below, also contributed to the overall increase in our total assets.


We believe that our current financial resources and funds generated from operations will be adequate to cover anticipated expenditures for debt service (current and long-term), cost of operationsoperation expenses, general and administrative expenses,expense costs, exploration and business development expenses,costs, and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. Our current financial resources are also available for royalty acquisitions, including the proposed acquisition of a gold stream on the Mt. Milligan project, and to fund dividends. Our long-term capital requirements are primarily affected by our ongoing acquisition activities. The Company currently, and generally at any time, seekshas acquisition opportunities in various stages of active review. In the event of a substantial royalty or other acquisition, we maywould likely need to seek additional debt or equity financing opportunities.

Please refer to our risk factors included in Part 1, Item 1A of this report for a discussion of certain risks that may impact the Company’sCompany's liquidity and capital resources in lightresources.

Recent Liquidity and Capital Resource Developments

Equity Offering

        In June 2010, we sold 5,980,000 shares of our common stock. The offering was priced at $48.50, and proceeds from the offering, net of commission and expenses, was approximately $276.2 million. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes and to fund acquisitions of additional royalty interests, including the acquisition of the recent economic downturn.

On October 30, 2008,gold stream on the Mt. Milligan Project discussed earlier in this MD&A, under "Recent Developments, Business Developments."

Credit Facility

        In connection with the IRC Transaction described earlier in this MD&A, the Company andborrowed $125 million under its credit facility. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $125 million outstanding under the credit facility, the maximum amount available. Refer to Note 6 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the credit facility.

Term Loan

        In connection with the IRC Transaction described earlier in this MD&A, on January 20, 2010, we entered into an agreement to obtain a new $100 million term loan from HSBC Bank USA, National Association ("HSBC Bank") (the "Term Loan") to partially fund the IRC Transaction. The Term Loan


Table of Contents


was funded on February 17, 2010 in conjunction with the closing of the IRC Transaction. HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. acted as sole lead arranger for the Term Loan. The Term Loan is guaranteed by three wholly-owned subsidiaries High Desert Mineral Resources, Inc. (“High Desert”) and RG Mexico, Inc. (“RG Mexico”), entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreementof Royal Gold (the “Credit Agreement”"Guarantors"). The obligations under the Term Loan were secured by certain Canadian assets of Royal Gold were replaced with certain Chilean assets of Royal Gold as of July 19, 2010.

        On March 26, 2010, the Company amended the Term Loan with HSBC Bank, Scotiabanc and the Bank of Nova Scotia joined the Term Loan as lenders.a lender. The Credit Agreement replacedmodifications to the Company’s $80Term Loan included, among other things: (1) an increase in the principal balance available under the Term Loan from $100 million revolving credit facility with HSBC Bank.

to $130 million; (2) an extension of the final maturity date from 18 to 36 months from the initial funding date of February 17, 2010; (3) increases in the applicable LIBOR margin (currently set at 2.25%) by 0.50% every six months, commencing 18 months after the initial funding date until maturity; and (4) a reduction in the amortization rate from 10% of the initial funded amount per quarter to 5% of the fully funded principal amount per quarter. The Credit Agreement providesadditional Term Loan proceeds were used to redeem the 5.5% senior secured debentures assumed by the Company a $125 million revolving credit facility with a maturity date of October 30, 2013. Borrowings under the credit facility will bear interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%, based on the Company’s leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement). Unlike the prior credit facility, availability under the new credit facility is not limited by a borrowing base formula.
The royalties securing the new credit facility consistas part of the GSR1, GSR2, GSR3,IRC Transaction.

        The Term Loan contains covenants limiting the ability of Royal Gold and NVR1 royalties at Cortezits subsidiaries to, among other things, incur certain debt or liens, dispose of assets, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, make certain investments or consummate certain mergers, as well as a cross default provision to certain other permitted debt and the royalties at Goldstrike — SJ Claims, Leeville, Robinson, Dolores, Peñasquito and Mulatos (the “Collateral Royalties”).royalty contracts. In addition, to the Collateral Royalties, the credit facility is secured by 100% of Royal Gold’s equity interests in High Desert and RG Mexico and substantially all of the present and future personal property and assets of the Company, High Desert and RG Mexico. The Credit AgreementTerm Loan contains financial covenants requiring the Companyrelating to, maintainamong other things: (1) maintaining a leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement)defined) of 3.0 to 1.0 or less,less; (2) maintaining a minimum consolidated net worth (as defined in the Credit Agreement)defined) of not less than a base amount that increases according to cumulative positive quarterly net income,income; (3) maintaining an interest coverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement)defined) of at leastgreater than 3.0 to 1.0 and (4) maintaining a current ratio (as defined indefined) for the Credit Agreement)periods ending March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 of at least 1.0 to 1.0, and for all times thereafter, of at least 1.5 to 1.01.0.

Prepayment and Termination of Chilean Term Loan Facility

        Royal Gold Chile Limitada ("RGCL"), a facility coverage ratio (as defined inwholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Gold, had a $19.25 million term loan outstanding bearing interest at LIBOR plus 0.25% pursuant to an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement ("Amended and Restated Agreement") between RGCL and HSBC Bank. On September 23, 2009, RGCL prepaid the Credit Agreement)full $19.25 million outstanding, plus interest, under the Amended and Restated Agreement. In addition to prepaying all outstanding amounts, RGCL notified HSBC Bank of at least 1.25its intention to 1.0.

Asterminate the Amended and Restated Agreement. Termination of June 30, 2009,the Amended and Restated Agreement was effective September 24, 2009.

        To secure RGCL's obligations under the Amended and Restated Agreement, the Company did not have any amounts outstanding undermaintained $19.25 million in a Collateral Account at HSBC Bank. The Collateral Account balance was recorded asRestricted cash—compensating balance on the credit facility.Company's consolidated balance sheets. Upon the full prepayment and termination of the Amended and Restated Agreement, the Collateral Account was closed and the $19.25 million was reclassified toCash and equivalents on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.


56

Table of Contents


Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2009,2010, are as follows:

                    
 Payments Due by Period (in thousands) 
 Less than More than  Payments Due by Period (in thousands) 
Contractual Obligations Total 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 5 Years  Total Less than 1
Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than
5 Years
 
Note payable(1)
 $19,546 $108 $19,438 $ $ 

Debt(1)

 $266,271 $32,087 $108,343 $125,841 $ 
Operating leases 718 193 525    525 203 322   
Other long-term obligations 89 26 53 10   83 26 53 4  
                      
Total $20,353 $327 $20,016 $10 $  $266,879 $32,316 $108,718 $125,845 $ 
                      

(1)
Amounts represent principal ($248.5 million) and estimated interest payments ($17.8 million) assuming no early extinguishment.
(1)Amounts represent principal ($19.25 million) and estimated interest payments ($0.3 million) assuming no early extinguishment.
For information on our contractual obligations, see Notes 5 and 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report. Royal Gold believes it will be able to fund all existing obligations from net cash provided by operating activities.

        For information on our contractual obligations, see Notes 6 and 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report. Royal Gold believes it will be able to fund all existing obligations from net cash provided by operating activities.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010, Compared with Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009

        For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, we recorded net income available to Royal Gold common stockholders of $21.5 million, or $0.49 per basic and diluted share, compared to net income of $38.3 million, or $1.09 per basic share and $1.07 per diluted share, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in our earnings per share during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 was due to (1) the IRC one-time severance and acquisition related costs of approximately $19.4 million, and (2) the one-time royalty restructuring gain of $31.5 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, as part of the Barrick royalty portfolio acquisition. The after tax effect of the one-time IRC related costs during the fiscal year ended, was $0.33 per basic share. The after tax effect of the one-time royalty restructuring gain during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, was $0.60 per basic share.

        For fiscal year 2010, we recognized total royalty revenue of $136.6 million (including $2.4 million of non-controlling interest), at an average gold price of $1,089 per ounce, compared to royalty revenue of $73.8 million (including $1.1 million of minority interest), at an average gold price of $874 per ounce


Table of Contents

for fiscal year 2009. Royalty revenue and the corresponding production, attributable to our royalty interests, for fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009 is as follows:

Royalty Revenue and Production Subject to our Royalty Interests
Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands, except reported production in ozs. and lbs.)

 
  
 Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2010
 Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2009
 
Royalty
 Metal(s) Royalty
Revenue
 Reported
Production(1)
 Royalty
Revenue
 Reported
Production(1)
 

Taparko(2)

 Gold $32,157  117,505 oz. $10,431  48,105 oz. 

Cortez

 Gold $25,059  357,595 oz. $16,343  268,327 oz. 

Robinson

   $12,148    $7,695    

 Gold     86,101 oz.     113,740 oz. 

 Copper     107.4 million lbs.     128.3 million lbs. 

Leeville

 Gold $9,912  454,148 oz. $6,659  429,122 oz. 

Mulatos

 Gold $8,990  164,954 oz. $6,110  167,907 oz. 

Siguiri(3)

 Gold $6,037  296,223 oz. $3,966  241,817 oz. 

Peñasquito(4)

   $6,032    $1,541    

 Gold     117,963 oz.     52,932 oz. 

 Silver     7.2 million oz.     2.5 million oz. 

 Lead     36.7 million lbs.     N/A 

 Zinc     48.5 million lbs.     N/A 

Goldstrike(3)

 Gold $3,939  348,802 oz. $5,585  724,368 oz. 

Voisey's Bay(4,5)

   $3,907     N/A    

 Nickel     19.0 million lbs.     N/A 

 Copper     8.6 million lbs.     N/A 

Andacollo(6)

 Gold $3,762  4,145 oz.  N/A  N/A 

Dolores

   $2,987    $900    

 Gold     73,463 oz.     38,819 oz. 

 Silver     1.2 million oz.     326,182 oz. 

Las Cruces(5)

 Copper $903  20.8 million lbs.  N/A  N/A 

Gwalia Deeps(5)

 Gold $854  47,626 oz.  N/A  N/A 

Other(7)

 Various $19,878  N/A $14,541  N/A 

Total Royalty Revenue

   $136,565    $73,771    

(1)
Reported production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our royalty interests, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, as reported to us by the operators of the mines.

(2)
Refer to "Recent Developments, Property Developments" as discussed earlier within this MD&A for a further discussion on recent developments at Taparko. Our TB-GSR1 royalty at Taparko will remain in effect until cumulative production of 804,420 ounces of gold is achieved or until cumulative payments of $35 million have been made to Royal Gold, whichever occurs first. Our TB-GSR2 royalty will remain in effect until the termination of TB-GSR1. As of June 30, 2010, we have recognized approximately $30.6 million in royalty revenue associated with TB-GSR1, which is attributable to cumulative production of approximately 202,000 ounces of gold. The Company expects the dollar cap could be met during the third calendar quarter of 2010.

(3)
As of June 30, 2010, the Company no longer considers this royalty principal to its business due to the decline in future potential royalty revenue from the property.

Table of Contents

(4)
Refer to "Recent Developments, Property Developments" as discussed earlier within this MD&A for a further discussion of recent developments at property.

(5)
Royalty acquired as part of the IRC Transaction. Refer to "Recent Developments, Business Developments" for further discussion on the IRC Transaction and "Recent Developments, Property Developments" for further discussion on recent developments at the property.

(6)
Royalty acquired in January 2010. Production at Andacollo began during the second calendar quarter of 2010. Refer to "Recent Developments, Business Developments" earlier within this MD&A for further discussion on the acquisition of the Andacollo Royalty.

(7)
"Other" includes all of the Company's non-principal producing royalties as of June 30, 2010 and 2009. Individually, no royalty included within the "Other" category contributed greater than 5% of our total royalty revenue for either period.

        The increase in royalty revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, compared with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, resulted primarily from an increase in the average gold and copper prices, additional revenue from the recently acquired IRC producing royalties and the Andacollo Royalty, and an increase in production at Taparko, Peñasquito and Cortez. These increases were partially offset during the period by a decrease in production at Robinson. Please refer to "Recent Developments, Property Developments" earlier within this MD&A for further discussion on recent developments regarding properties covered by certain of our royalty interests.

        Cost of operations expenses increased to $6.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, from $3.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation allocated to cost of operations of approximately $1.2 million and an increase in the Nevada Net Proceeds Tax ("NNPT") expense of approximately $0.8 million, which resulted from an increase in royalty revenue from Cortez, Robinson and Leeville.

        General and administrative expenses increased to $12.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, from $7.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense allocated to general and administrative expense during the period of approximately $2.2 million, an increase in general corporate costs of approximately $1.5 million and an increase in accounting and tax related expenses of approximately $1.0 million.

        Exploration and business development expenses increased to $3.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, from $3.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation allocated to exploration and business development of approximately $1.0 million. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in consulting and legal related expenses for exploration and business development activities.

        The Company recorded total non-cash stock-based compensation expense related to our equity compensation plans of $7.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, compared to $2.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The increase is primarily due to an increase in the number of performance share awards the Company has estimated will vest. Our non-cash stock-based compensation is allocated amongst costs of operations, general and administrative and exploration and business development in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Please refer to Note 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the allocation of non-cash stock-based compensation for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

        Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased to $53.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, from $32.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Increased production at Taparko, Peñasquito, Dolores and Leeville resulted in additional depletion expense of approximately $14.7 million during the period. Also, the producing royalties acquired as part of the IRC Transaction


Table of Contents


resulted in additional depletion expense of approximately $5.5 million from the acquisition date through June 30, 2010.

        As discussed in Note 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred approximately $19.4 million in severance and acquisition related costs associated with the IRC Transaction. These one-time, non-recurring costs were related to financial advisory, legal, accounting, tax and consulting services associated with the IRC Transaction as well as severance related payments as part of the termination of IRC's officers and certain employees upon acquisition of IRC.

        Interest and other income increased to $6.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, from $3.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to a $5.9 million gain on distributions of gold inventory attributable to non-controlling interests. The increase was partially off by (i) a decrease in our average invested cash during fiscal year 2010 when compared to fiscal year 2009, and (ii) a decrease in the interest rates associated with our invested cash.

        Interest and other expense increased to $3.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, from $1.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in interest expense associated with the outstanding balances on the Company's debt facilities, as discussed in Note 6 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

        During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, we recognized income tax expense totaling $14.2 million compared with $21.9 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. This resulted in an effective tax rate of 32.5% during the current period, compared with 34.6% in the prior period. The decrease in the effective tax rate for June 30, 2010 is primarily related to (i) less pre-tax income as a result of the one-time royalty portfolio gain in June 30, 2009, (ii) an increase in the depletion allowance, and (iii) an increase in the income attributable to non-controlling interests. The tax rate for June 30, 2010 also included non-deductible acquisition related costs and increases in reserves for income tax contingencies as a result of uncertain tax positions acquired during the year. Without the costs incurred as a result of the IRC Transaction, the effective tax rate would have been 29.5% for the year.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009, Compared with Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, we recorded net income of $38.3 million, or $1.09 per basic share and $1.07 per diluted share, compared to net income attributable to Royal Gold stockholders of $24.0 million, or $0.62 per basic share and $0.61 per diluted share (after adjustments for preferred stock dividends and deemed dividends), for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. The increase in our earnings per share during the period was primarily due to the royalty portfolio restructuring gains of approximately $33.7 million as part of the Barrick royalty portfolio acquisition and the Benso royalty buy-back exercise by Golden Star both as discussed earlier in this MD&A.during our fiscal year 2009. The effect of the restructuring gains was $0.62 per basic share, after taxes.

For fiscal year 2009, we recognized total royalty revenue of $73.8 million (including $1.1 million of minoritynon-controlling interest), at an average gold price of $874 per ounce, compared to royalty revenue of $66.3 million (including $1.4 million of minoritynon-controlling interest), at an average gold price of $821 per


Table of Contents


ounce for fiscal year 2008. Royalty revenue and the corresponding production, attributable to our royalty interests, for fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008 is as follows:

57


Royalty Revenue and Production Subject to Ourour Royalty Interests
Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except reported production in ozs. and lbs.)

                    
 Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended
 June 30, 2009 June 30, 2008
 Royalty Reported Royalty Reported  
 Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2009
 Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2008
 
Royalty Metal Revenue Production(1) Revenue Production(1) Metal(s) Royalty
Revenue
 Reported
Production(1)
 Royalty
Revenue
 Reported
Production(1)
 
Cortez Gold $16,343 268,327 oz. $21,989 436,148 oz. Gold $16,343 268,327 oz. $21,989 436,148 oz. 
Taparko(2)
 Gold $10,431 48,105 oz. $7,435 36,078 oz.
Robinson(3)
 $7,695 $16,576 

Taparko(2)

 Gold $10,431 48,105 oz. $7,435 36,078 oz. 

Robinson

 $7,695   $16,576   
 Gold 113,740 oz. 120,873 oz. Gold   113,740 oz.   120,873 oz. 
 Copper 128.3 million lbs. 139.0 million lbs. Copper   128.3 million lbs.   139.0 million lbs. 
Leeville Gold $6,659 429,122 oz. $5,570 360,811 oz. Gold $6,659 429,122 oz. $5,570 360,811 oz. 
Mulatos(4)
 Gold $6,110 167,907 oz. $1,521 120,933 oz.

Mulatos

 Gold $6,110 167,907 oz. $1,521 120,933 oz. 
Goldstrike Gold $5,585 724,368 oz. $5,086 698,488 oz. Gold $5,585 724,368 oz. $5,086 698,488 oz. 
Siguiri(5)
 Gold $3,966 241,817 oz. N/A N/A 

Siguiri(3)

 Gold $3,966 241,817 oz. N/A N/A 
Peñasquito (oxide) $1,541 $59  $1,541   $59   
 Gold 52,932 oz. 1,618 oz. Gold   52,932 oz.   1,618 oz. 
 Silver 2.5 million oz. 91,601 oz. Silver   2.5 million oz.   91,601 oz. 
Dolores(6)
 $900 N/A 

Dolores

 $900   N/A   
 Gold 38,819 oz. N/A  Gold   38,819 oz.   N/A 
 Silver 326,182 oz. N/A  Silver   326,182 oz.   N/A 
Other(7)
 Various $14,541 N/A $8,061 N/A 

Other(4)

 Various $14,541 N/A $8,061 N/A 
Total Royalty Revenue
 $73,771 $66,297  $73,771   $66,297   

(1)
Reported production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our royalty interests, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, as reported to us by the operators of the mines.

(2)
Refer to "Recent Developments—Property Developments" as discussed earlier within this MD&A for a further discussion on recent developments at Taparko. Our TB-GSR1 royalty at Taparko will remain in effect until cumulative production of 804,420 ounces of gold is achieved or until cumulative payments of $35 million have been made to Royal Gold, whichever occurs first. Our TB-GSR2 royalty will remain in effect until the termination of TB-GSR1. As of June 30, 2009, we recognized approximately $11.2 million in royalty revenue associated with TB-GSR1, which is attributable to cumulative production of approximately 84,000 ounces of gold.

(3)
The Siguiri royalty is subject to a dollar cap of approximately $12.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $7.9 million remained under the Siguiri royalty cap.

(4)
"Other" includes all of the Company's non-principal producing royalties as of June 30, 2009 and 2008. Individually, no royalty included within "Other" contributed greater than 5% of our total royalty revenue for the period.
(1)Reported production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our royalty interests, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, as reported to us by the operators of the mines.
(2)Refer to “Recent Developments — Property Developments” as discussed earlier within this MD&A for a further discussion on recent developments at Taparko. Our TB-GSR1 royalty at Taparko will remain in effect until cumulative production of 804,420 ounces of gold is achieved or until cumulative payments of $35 million have been made to Royal Gold, whichever occurs first. Our TB-GSR2 royalty will remain in effect until the termination of TB-GSR1. As of June 30, 2009, we have recognized approximately $11.2 million in royalty revenue associated with TB-GSR1, which is attributable to cumulative production of approximately 84,000 ounces of gold.
(3)Refer to “Recent Developments — Property Developments” as discussed earlier within this MD&A for a further discussion on recent developments at Robinson.
(4)As part of the Barrick transaction, as discussed earlier within this MD&A, the Mulatos sliding-scale royalty rate increased to 5.0% from 1.5%, at current prices, resulting in additional royalty revenue of approximately $3.9 million during the period.
(5)Royalty acquired in October 2008 as part of the Barrick transaction, as discussed earlier within this MD&A. The Siguiri royalty is subject to a dollar cap of approximately $12.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $7.9 million remains under the Siguiri royalty cap.
(6)Royalty acquired in December 2007 and began production during the fourth quarter of calendar year 2008. The Company’s 2.0% NSR royalty on gold and silver produced from Dolores became effective on May 1, 2009, once commercial production was achieved.
(7)“Other” includes all of the Company’s non-principal producing royalties as of June 30, 2009 and 2008. Individually, no royalty included within “Other” contributed greater than 5% of our total royalty revenue for the period. Royalties included in the “Other” category that were acquired in the Barrick transaction in October 2008 contributed aggregate royalty revenue of approximately $4.4 million during the period, not including royalty revenue from Siguiri and Mulatos, which are shown separately in the table. The remaining royalties in the “Other” category contributed aggregate royalty revenue of approximately $10.1 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, compared to $8.1 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. Of this royalty revenue, Troy contributed approximately $2.5 million, El Chanate contributed approximately $2.2 million and Don Mario contributed approximately $1.6 million during the current period, compared to $2.5 million, $1.1 million and $1.4 million for the prior period, respectively.

58


The increase in royalty revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, compared with the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, resulted primarily from an increase in the average gold price, production from the recently acquired Barrick royalty portfolio (notably Mulatos and Siguiri), an increase in production at Taparko and Leeville, and commencement of production at Peñasquito and Dolores. These increases were partially offset during the period by a decrease in production and a reduction in


Table of Contents


our GSR2 royalty rate at Cortez and a decrease in royalty revenue at Robinson due to the negative provisional pricing adjustments, which resulted from the sharp decrease in copper prices during our second and third fiscal quarters of 2009.

Please refer to “Recent Developments — Property Developments” earlier within this MD&A for a further discussion on recent developments regarding properties covered by certain of our royalty interests.

Cost of operations expenses decreased to $3.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, from $3.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the Nevada Net Proceeds Tax (“NNPT”)NNPT expense, which resulted primarily from a decrease in royalty revenue from Robinson and Cortez. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in legal fees associated with the Holt litigation as discussed further under “Recent"Recent Developments, - Property Developments”Developments" within this MD&A.

General and administrative expenses increased to $7.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, from $7.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense allocated to general and administrative expense during the period and an increase in corporate legal fees.

Exploration and business development expenses decreased to $3.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, from $4.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. The decrease iswas due to a decrease in legal, tax and consulting services for business development activities during the period.

The Company recorded total non-cash stockstock-based compensation expense related to our equity compensation plan of $2.9 million for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Our non-cash stock compensation is allocated among cost of operations, general and administrative, and exploration and business development in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Please refer to Note 67 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements for further discussion of our stock-based compensation and the allocation of non-cash stockstock-based compensation for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense increased to $32.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, from $18.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. Depletion from the Barrick royalties acquired in October 2008 contributed approximately $8.6 million in additional depletion expense during the period.fiscal year 2009. Increased production at Taparko, Leeville, Goldstrike and El Chanate resulted in additional depletion expense of approximately $2.4 million during the period.fiscal year 2009. Properties that recently began production, which included Peñasquito and Dolores, contributed approximately $1.2 million in additional depletion expense during the period.

fiscal year 2009.

Interest and other income decreased to $3.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, from $6.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. The decrease iswas primarily due to a significant decrease in interest rates associated with our invested cash. The decrease was partially offset by a $1.9 million gain on a distribution ofInventory — restrictedto a minoritynon-controlling interest holder.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, we recognized income tax expense totaling $21.9 million compared with $12.1 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. This resulted in an effective tax rate of 36.3%34.6% in the current period,fiscal year 2009, compared with 33.4%31.7% in the prior period. The increase in our effective tax rate iswas the result of the royalty restructuring gain as part of the Barrick royalty portfolio

59


acquisition as discussed earlier in this MD&A,during our fiscal year 2009, and an increase in the amount of foreign losses for which no tax benefit is currently recognized.


Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008, Compared with Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007
(1)Reported production relates to the amount of metal sales, subject to our royalty interests, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, as reported to us by the operators of the mines.
(2)Receipt of royalty revenue commenced during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
(3)“Other” includes all of the Company’s non-principal producing royalties as of June 30, 2008 and 2007. The royalties in the “Other” category contributed aggregate royalty revenue of approximately $8.1 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, compared to $5.2 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. Of this royalty revenue, Troy contributed approximately $2.5 million, Don Mario contributed approximately $1.4 million and El Chanate contributed approximately $1.1 million during the current period, compared to $3.1 million, $0 and $0 for the prior period, respectively.

60

Contents


Robinson and Leeville, the continued ramp-up of gold production at the Taparko mine and production from the acquired Battle Mountain production stage royalty interests. The continued ramp-up of production at the Taparko mine contributed approximately $7.4 million in royalty revenue during the period, while production from the Battle Mountain royalties contributed approximately $2.8 million in royalty revenue during the period. The increase in royalty revenue was offset slightly by decreases in production volume at Cortez, Goldstrike and Troy mine royalties.
The Taparko mine commenced gold production in August 2007 and contributed approximately $7.4 million in royalty revenue for our fiscal year 2008. Reserve characteristics, mining activity, and gold recovery performance has been near feasibility study estimates. However, mill performance suffered throughout our fiscal year 2008 due to problems associated with the grinding mill drive-train. This has resulted in low mill availability and throughput. Several problems with the original installation were identified and corrected but mechanical problems persisted throughout much of fiscal year 2008, causing production to cease at times during our fiscal year 2008.
Cost of operations expenses increased to $3.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, from $3.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the NNPT expense, which resulted from an increase in royalty revenue from the Cortez, Leeville and Robinson royalties.
General and administrative expenses increased to $7.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, from $5.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily due to an increase in general corporate costs of approximately $0.5 million, tax and consulting fees of approximately $0.4 million, non-recurring general corporate costs associated with the preferred stock offering of approximately $0.2 million and an increase in employee related costs of approximately $0.2 million.
Exploration and business development expenses increased to $4.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, from $2.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The increase was due to additional legal and consulting services for business development activities during the period.
The Company recorded total non-cash stock compensation expense related to our equity compensation plan of $2.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, compared to $2.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. Our non-cash stock compensation is allocated among cost of operations, general and administrative, and exploration and business development in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Please refer to Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our stock-based compensation and the allocation of non-cash stock compensation for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased to $18.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, from $8.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily due to the continued ramp-up of gold production at the Taparko mine, which contributed approximately $4.5 million in additional depletion during the period. Depletion from the Battle Mountain producing royalties also contributed approximately $2.3 million in additional depletion during the period. An increase in production at Robinson and Mulatos as well as the additional depletion from the royalties on the El Chanate mine also resulted in additional depletion of approximately $1.4 million over the prior period. Finally, an increase in production at Leeville resulted in additional depletion of approximately $1.0 million over the prior period.
Interest and other income increased to $6.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, from $4.3 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily due to an increase in funds available for investing over the prior period, which is due primarily to the preferred stock offering completed in November 2007. The increase was partially offset by lower interest rates on our cash investments when compared to the prior period.

61


During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, we recognized current and deferred tax expense totaling $12.1 million compared with $9.5 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. This resulted in an effective tax rate of 33.4% in the current period, compared with 32.6% in the prior period. The increase in our effective tax rate is the result of the increase in the amount of foreign losses for which no tax benefit is currently recognized, as well as an increase in our non-cash stock compensation expense associated with incentive stock options for which there is no current tax deduction.
Forward-Looking Statements

Cautionary “Safe Harbor”"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.1995: With the exception of historical matters, the matters discussed in this report are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projections or estimates contained herein. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding projected production estimates and estimates pertaining to timing and commencement of production from the operators of our royalty properties; the adequacy of financial resources and funds to cover anticipated expenditures for general and administrative expenses as well as costs associated with exploration and business development and capital expenditures, and our expectation that substantially all our revenues will be derived from royalty interests. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, among others:

    changes in gold and other metals prices on which our royalties are paid or prices associated with the primary metals mined at our royalty properties;

    the production at or performance of our producing royalty properties;

    decisions and activities of the operators of our royalty properties;

    the ability of operators to bring projects into production and operate in accordance with feasibility studies;

    liquidity or other problems our operators may encounter;

    unanticipated grade and geological, metallurgical, processing or other problems at the royalty properties;

    mine operating and ore processing facility problems, pit wall or tailings dam failures, natural catastrophes such as floods or earthquakes and access to raw materials, water and power;

    changes in project parameters as plans of the operators are refined;

    changes in estimates of reserves and mineralization by the operators of our royalty properties;

    economic and market conditions;

    future financial needs;

    federal, state and foreign legislation governing us or the operators of our royalty properties;

    the availability of royalties for acquisition or other acquisition opportunities and the availability of debt or equity financing necessary to complete such acquisitions;

    our ability to make accurate assumptions regarding the valuation, timing and amount of royalty payments when making acquisitions;

    risks associated with conducting business in foreign countries, including application of foreign laws to contract and other disputes, environmental and permitting laws, community unrest and labor disputes, and enforcement and uncertain political and economic environments;

    risks associated with issuances of substantial additional common stock or incurrence of substantial indebtedness in connection with acquisitions or otherwise;

    acquisition and maintenance of permits and authorizations, completion of construction and commencement and continuation of production at the royalty properties;

    changes to management and key employees; and

    failure to complete future acquisitions;

changes in gold and other metals prices on which our royalties are paid or metals which are the primary deposit mined at our royalty properties;
the production at or performance of our producing royalty properties;
decisions and activities of the operators of our royalty properties;
the ability of operators to bring projects into production and operate in accordance with feasibility studies;
liquidity or other problems our operators may encounter;
unanticipated grade and geological, metallurgical, processing or other problems at the properties;
mine operating and ore processing facility problems, pit wall or tailings dam failures, natural catastrophes such as floods or earthquakes and access to raw materials, water and power;
changes in project parameters as plans of the operators are refined;
changes in estimates of reserves and mineralization by the operators of our royalty properties;
economic and market conditions;
future financial needs;
federal, state and foreign legislation governing us or the operators of our royalty properties;
the availability of royalties for acquisition or other acquisition opportunities and the availability of debt or equity financing necessary to complete such acquisitions;
our ability to make accurate assumptions regarding the valuation, timing and amount of royalty payments when making acquisitions;
risks associated with conducting business in foreign countries, including application of foreign laws to contract and other disputes, environmental and permitting laws, community unrest and labor disputes, and enforcement and uncertain political and economic environments;
risks associated with issuances of substantial additional common stock or incurrence of substantial indebtedness in connection with acquisitions or otherwise;
satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions to the proposed acquisition of an interest in the gold production from the Andacollo mine described herein and the closing thereof;

62

Table of Contents


acquisition and maintenance of permits and authorizations, completion of construction and commencement and continuation of production at the Andacollo mine; and
changes to management and key employees;
as well as other factors described elsewhere in this report and our other reports filed with the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission. Most of these factors are beyond our ability to predict or control. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made herein. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our earnings and cash flowflows are significantly impacted by changes in the market price of gold and other metals. Gold, silver, copper and other metal prices can fluctuate significantly and are affected by numerous factors, such as demand, production levels, economic policies of central banks, producer hedging, world political and economic events and the strength of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies. Please see “Volatility"Volatility in gold, silver, copper and other metal prices may have an adverse impact on the value of our royalty interests and reduce our royalty revenues," under Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this report for more information on factors that can affect gold, silver, copper and other metal prices as well as historical gold, silver, and copper prices.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, we reported royalty revenues of $73.8$136.6 million, with an average gold price for the period of $874$1,089 per ounce and an average copper price of $2.25$3.03 per pound. Approximately 84%81% of our total recognized revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, were attributable to gold sales from our gold producing royalty interests, as shown within Item 7, MD&A, of this report. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, if the price of gold had averaged higher or lower by $50$100 per ounce, we would have recorded a correspondingan increase in revenue of approximately $11.3 million or a decrease in revenuesrevenue of approximately $3.8$10.6 million. Approximately 11%9% of our total recognized revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, were attributable to copper sales.sales from our copper producing royalty interests. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, if the price of copper had averaged higher or lower by $0.50 per pound, we would have recorded an increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $2.3$2.1 million, respectively.


63


Table of Contents

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Financial Statements

Page
Page

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 6564

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 
65
66

 67
66

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’CHANGES IN EQUITY

 68
67

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 69
68

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 70
69

64


Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors Royal Gold, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying appendixindex present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Royal Gold, Inc. and its subsidiaries at June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 20092010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009,2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’sCompany's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Partpart II, Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

        As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for non-controlling interests effective July 1, 2009, which required retrospective application for all periods presented.

A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
August 20, 200926, 2010


65


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.


Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of June 30,

(In thousands except share data)

         
  2009  2008 
Current assets        
Cash and equivalents $294,566  $192,035 
Royalty receivables  20,597   16,317 
Income tax receivable  2,372   2,186 
Deferred tax assets  166   131 
Prepaid expenses and other  1,007   308 
       
         
Total current assets  318,708   210,977 
         
Royalty interests in mineral properties, net  455,966   300,670 
Restricted cash — compensating balance  19,250   15,750 
Inventory — restricted  10,622   11,170 
Other assets  5,378   7,283 
       
Total assets $809,924  $545,850 
       
 
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $2,403  $4,753 
Dividends payable  3,259   2,384 
Other  527   1,797 
       
Total current liabilities  6,189   8,934 
         
Net deferred tax liabilities  23,371   26,034 
Term loan facility  19,250   15,750 
Other long-term liabilities  703   504 
       
Total liabilities  49,513   51,222 
       
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)        
Minority interest in subsidiary  10,970   11,411 
Stockholders’ equity        
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares; and issued 40,480,311 and 33,926,495 shares, respectively  405   339 
Additional paid-in capital  702,407   463,335 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income  (80)  65 
Accumulated earnings  46,709   19,478 
       
Total stockholders’ equity  749,441   483,217 
       
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $809,924  $545,850 
       
 
 2010 2009 

ASSETS

       

Cash and equivalents

 $324,846 $294,566 

Royalty receivables

  40,363  20,597 

Income tax receivable

  3,432  2,372 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  2,627  1,173 
      
 

Total current assets

  371,268  318,708 

Royalty interests in mineral properties, net (Note 5)

  
1,467,983
  
455,966
 

Restricted cash—compensating balance

    19,250 

Other assets

  22,082  16,000 
      
 

Total assets

 $1,861,333 $809,924 
      

LIABILITIES

       

Current portion of long-term debt (Note 6)

 $26,000 $ 

Accounts payable

  2,367  2,403 

Dividends payable

  4,970  3,259 

Other current liabilities

  2,437  527 
      
 

Total current liabilities

  35,774  6,189 

Long-term debt (Note 6)

  
222,500
  
 

Net deferred tax liabilities

  152,583  23,371 

Chilean loan facility

    19,250 

Other long-term liabilities

  16,928  703 
      
 

Total liabilities

  427,785  49,513 
      

Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)

       

EQUITY

       

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares authorized; and 0 shares issued

     

Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; and 53,324,171 and 40,480,311 shares outstanding, respectively

  534  405 

Exchangeable shares, no par value, 1,806,649 and 0 shares issued, less 176,540 and 0 redeemed shares, respectively

  
71,741
  
 

Additional paid-in capital

  1,284,087  702,407 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)

  (34) (80)

Accumulated earnings

  51,862  46,709 

Treasury stock, at cost (96,675 and 0 shares, respectively)

  (4,474)  
      

Total Royal Gold stockholders' equity

  1,403,716  749,441 

Non-controlling interests

  29,832  10,970 
      
 

Total equity

  1,433,548  760,411 
      
 

Total liabilities and equity

 $1,861,333 $809,924 
      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


66


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.


Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income


For The Years Ended June 30,


(In thousands except share data)

            
 2009 2008 2007 
 2010 2009 2008 
Royalty revenues $73,771 $66,297 $48,357 

Royalty revenues

 $136,565 $73,771 $66,297 
 
Costs and expenses 

Costs and expenses

 
 

Costs of operations (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)

 6,235 3,551 3,664 
Costs of operations (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below) 3,551 3,664 3,265 
General and administrative 7,352 7,208 5,824 
Exploration and business development 2,998 4,079 2,493 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 32,578 18,364 8,269 

General and administrative

 12,595 7,352 7,208 

Exploration and business development

 3,503 2,998 4,079 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 53,793 32,578 18,364 

Severance and acquisition related costs

 19,404   
               
Total costs and expenses 46,479 33,315 19,851 

Total costs and expenses

 95,530 46,479 33,315 
               
 
Operating income 27,292 32,982 28,506 

Operating income

 41,035 27,292 32,982 
 
Royalty portfolio restructuring gain 33,714   

Royalty portfolio restructuring gain

 
 
33,714
 
 
Interest and other income 3,192 6,742 4,258 

Interest and other income

 6,360 3,192 6,742 
Interest and other expense  (984)  (1,729)  (1,973)

Interest and other expense

 (3,809) (984) (1,729)
               
Income before income taxes 63,214 37,995 30,791 

Income before income taxes

 43,586 63,214 37,995 
Income tax expense  (21,857)  (12,050)  (9,549)

Income tax expense

 
(14,164

)
 
(21,857

)
 
(12,050

)
Minority interest in income of consolidated subsidiary  (3,009)  (1,352)  (1,522)
Loss from equity investment   (550)  

Loss from equity investment

   (550)
               
Net income $38,348 $24,043 $19,720 

Net income

 29,422 41,357 25,395 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 (7,930) (3,009) (1,352)
       

Net income attributable to Royal Gold stockholders

Net income attributable to Royal Gold stockholders

 21,492 38,348 24,043 

Preferred dividends

Preferred dividends

   (4,788)
       

Net income available to Royal Gold common stockholders

Net income available to Royal Gold common stockholders

 $21,492 $38,348 $19,255 
       

Net income

Net income

 $29,422 $41,357 $25,395 

Adjustments to comprehensive income, net of tax

Adjustments to comprehensive income, net of tax

 
       

Unrealized change in market value of available for sale securities

 45 (145) (393)
         
Adjustments to other comprehensive income 
Unrealized change in market value of available for sale securities, net of tax  (145)  (393)  (40)

Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income

 29,467 41,212 25,002 

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

 (7,930) (3,009) (1,352)
               
Comprehensive income $38,203 $23,650 $19,680 

Comprehensive income attributable to Royal Gold stockholders

Comprehensive income attributable to Royal Gold stockholders

 $21,537 $38,203 $23,650 
               
 
Net income $38,348 $24,043 $19,720 
Preferred dividends   (4,788)  
       
Net income available to common stockholders $38,348 $19,255 $19,720 
       
 

Net income per share available to Royal Gold common stockholders:

Net income per share available to Royal Gold common stockholders:

 
Basic earnings per share $1.09 $0.62 $0.79 

Basic earnings per share

 $0.49 $1.09 $0.62 
               
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 35,337,133 31,054,725 24,827,319 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 43,640,414 35,337,133 31,054,725 
         
Diluted earnings per share $1.07 $0.61 $0.79 

Diluted earnings per share

 $0.49 $1.07 $0.61 
               
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 35,789,076 31,390,293 25,075,086 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 43,980,817 35,789,076 31,390,293 
               

Cash dividends declared per common share

Cash dividends declared per common share

 $0.34 $0.30 $0.30 
       

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


67

Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’Changes in Equity

For the Years Ended June 30, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007

2008

(In thousands except share data)

                                         
                  Additional  Accumulated Other  Accumulated          Total 
  Preferred Shares  Common Shares  Paid-In  Comprehensive  (Deficit)  Treasury Stock  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Income (Loss)  Earnings  Shares  Amount  Equity 
Balance at June 30, 2006
          23,816,640  $238  $166,460  $498  $(4,440)  229,224  $(1,097) $161,659 
Issuance of common stock for:                                        
Equity offering          4,400,064   44   121,894                   121,938 
Peñasquito royalty acquisition          577,434   6   18,495                   18,501 
Exercise of stock options          46,467      582                   582 
Vesting of restricted stock          52,375   1   (1)                   
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation exercises                  346                   346 
Recognition of non-cash compensation expense for stock- based compensation                  2,663                   2,663 
Net income and comprehensive income for the year ended June 30, 2007                      (40)  19,721           19,681 
Dividends declared                          (6,289)          (6,289)
                               
Balance at June 30, 2007
        28,892,980 ��$289  $310,439  $458  $8,992   229,224  $(1,097) $319,081 
Issuance of preferred stock for:                                        
7.25% Mandatory Convertible offering  1,150,000   115,000           (3,902)                  111,098 
Issuance of common stock for:                                        
Conversion of 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock  (1,150,000)  (115,000)  3,977,683   40   116,946                   1,986 
Battle Mountain acquisition          1,144,025   11   35,832                   35,843 
Equity offering costs (April 2007)                  (29)                  (29)
Exercise of stock options          101,750   1   724                   725 
Vesting of restricted stock          19,625                          0 
IAMGOLD Corporation and Repadre International Corporation          216,642   2   6,343                   6,345 
Retire treasury stock          (426,210)  (4)  (6,609)          (426,210)  6,613    
                                         
Repurchase of common stock                              196,986   (5,516)  (5,516)
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation exercises                  722                   722 
Recognition of non-cash compensation expense for stock-based compensation                  2,869                   2,869 
                                         
Net income and comprehensive income for the year income for the year ended June 30, 2008                      (393)  24,043           23,650 
Preferred stock deemed dividend upon conversion of 7.25% Mandatory Convertible                          (1,986)          (1,986)
Preferred stock dividends declared                          (2,803)          (2,803)
Common stock dividends declared                          (8,768)          (8,768)
                               
Balance at June 30, 2008
        33,926,495  $339  $463,335  $65  $19,478     $  $483,217 
Issuance of common stock for:                                        
Equity offering          6,500,000   65   234,867                   234,932 
Exercise of stock options          50,190   1   772                   773 
Other          3,626       178                   178 
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation exercises                  334                   334 
Recognition of non-cash compensation expense for stock- based compensation                  2,921                   2,921 
Net income and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended June 30, 2009                      (145)  38,348           38,203 
Dividends declared                          (11,117)          (11,117)
                               
                                         
Balance at June 30, 2009
        40,480,311  $405  $702,407  $(80) $46,709     $  $749,441 
                               
 
 Royal Gold Stockholders  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
 Exchangeable
Shares
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 Preferred Shares Common Shares  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  
 Treasury Stock  
  
 
 
 Additional
Paid-In Capital
 Accumulated
Earnings
 Non-controlling
interests
 Total
Equity
 
 
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount 

Balance at June 30, 2007

   $  28,892,980 $289   $ $310,439 $458 $8,992  229,224 $(1,097)$11,121 $330,202 

Issuance of preferred stock for:

                                        
 

7.25% Mandatory Convertible

  1,150,000 $115,000            (3,902)           111,098 

Issuance of common stock for:

                                        
 

Conversion of 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock

  (1,150,000) (115,000) 3,977,683  40        116,946            1,986 
 

Battle Mountain acquisition

      1,144,025  11        35,832            35,843 
 

Equity offering costs

                (29)           (29)

Stock-based compensation and related share issuances

      121,375  1        4,315            4,316 

IAMGOLD Corporation and Repadre International Corporation

      216,642  2        6,343            6,345 

Retire treasury stock

      (426,210) (4)       (6,609)     (426,210) 6,613     

Repurchase of common stock

                      196,986  (5,516)   (5,516)

Net income

                    24,043      1,352  25,395 

Comprehensive income (loss)

                  (393)         (393)

Distribution to non-controlling interests

                          (1,062) (1,062)

Preferred stock deemed dividend upon conversion

                    (1,986)       (1,986)

Preferred stock dividends declared

                    (2,803)       (2,803)

Common stock dividends declared

                    (8,768)       (8,768)
                            

Balance at June 30, 2008

   $  33,926,495 $339   $ $463,335 $65 $19,478   $ $11,411 $494,628 

Issuance of common stock for:

                                        
 

Equity offering

      6,500,000  65        234,867            234,932 
 

Other

      5,335          178            178 

Stock-based compensation and related share issuances

      48,481  1        4,027            4,028 

Net income

                    38,348      3,009  41,357 

Comprehensive income (loss)

                  (145)         (145)

Distribution to non-controlling interests

                          (3,450) (3,450)

Dividends declared

                    (11,117)       (11,117)
                            

Balance at June 30, 2009

   $  40,480,311 $405   $ $702,407 $(80)$46,709   $ $10,970 $760,411 

Issuance of common stock for:

                                       
 

Equity offering

      5,980,000  60        276,158            276,218 
 

Acquisition of International Royalty Corporation

      5,234,086  52  1,806,649  79,511  230,236      22,245  (917) 20,704  329,586 
 

Andacollo Royalty acquisition

      1,204,136  12        53,416            53,428 
 

Exchange of exchangeable shares

      176,540  2  (176,540) (7,770) 7,768             

Stock-based compensation and related share issuances

      249,098  3        14,102      74,430  (3,557)   10,548 

Net income

                    21,492      7,930  29,422 

Comprehensive income (loss)

                  46          46 

Distribution to non-controlling interests

                          (9,772) (9,772)

Dividends declared

                    (16,339)       (16,339)
                            

Balance at June 30, 2010

   $  53,324,171 $534  1,630,109 $71,741 $1,284,087 $(34)$51,862  96,675 $(4,474)$29,832 $1,433,548 
                            

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


68

Table of Contents



ROYAL GOLD, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended June 30,

(In thousands)

             
  2009  2008  2007 
Cash flows from operating activities            
Net income $38,348  $24,043  $19,720 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  32,578   18,364   8,269 
Deferred tax expense (benefit)  (2,170)  115   (761)
Non-cash employee stock compensation expense  2,921   2,869   2,663 
Royalty portfolio restructuring gain  (33,714)      
Loss on available for sale securities     49    
Note receivable — Battle Mountain Gold Exploration     (713)   
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation exercises  (334)  (722)  (346)
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Royalty receivables  (4,280)  (3,120)  (6,508)
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (389)  (232)  414 
Accounts payable  (1,842)  2,211   1,020 
Income taxes (receivable) payable  (147)  (1,846)  16 
Other  (924)  (1,891)  (140)
          
 
Net cash provided by operating activities $30,047  $39,127  $24,347 
          
Cash flows from investing activities            
Acquisition of royalty interests in mineral properties $(186,110) $(16,246) $(120,808)
Proceeds from royalty portfolio restructuring  34,897       
Note receivable — Battle Mountain Gold Exploration        (14,494)
Restricted cash — compensating balance  (3,500)     (15,750)
Deferred acquisition costs  (1,021)  (157)  (973)
Battle Mountain acquisition, net of cash acquired of $1,398     (2,933)   
Proceeds on sale of Inventory — restricted  1,924       
Other  (284)  (42)  (366)
          
 
Net cash used in investing activities $(154,094) $(19,378) $(152,391)
          
Cash flows from financing activities            
Common stock dividends $(10,242) $(8,253) $(5,721)
Preferred stock dividends     (2,802)   
Debt issuance costs  (797)  (27)  (464)
Borrowings under term loan facility  3,500      15,750 
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation exercises  334   722   346 
Gold loan payoff — Battle Mountain     (6,476)   
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock  235,707   698   122,526 
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock     111,098    
Distribution to minority interest holder  (1,924)        
Stock repurchase program     (5,516)   
          
Net cash provided by financing activities $226,578  $89,444  $132,437 
          
Net increase in cash and equivalents  102,531   109,193   4,393 
          
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year  192,035   82,842   78,449 
          
Cash and equivalents at end of year $294,566  $192,035  $82,842 
          
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Net income

 $29,422 $41,357 $25,395 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

          
 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  53,793  32,578  18,364 
 

Gain on distribution to non-controlling interest

  (5,891) (1,924) (543)
 

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

  (7,536) (2,170) 115 
 

Non-cash employee stock compensation expense

  7,279  2,921  2,869 
 

Gain on royalty restructuring

    (33,714)  
 

Tax benefit of stock-based compensation exercises

  (1,638) (334) (722)
 

Other

  371    (665)

Changes in assets and liabilities:

          
 

Royalty receivables

  (19,055) (4,280) (3,120)
 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  4,035  (477) 36 
 

Accounts payable

  (10,742) (1,834) 2,244 
 

Income taxes (receivable) payable

  (2,697) (147) (1,846)
 

Other

  1,030  (1,929) (3,000)
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

 $48,371 $30,047 $39,127 
        

Cash flows from investing activities:

          
 

Acquisition of royalty interests in mineral properties

  (232,996) (186,110) (19,179)
 

Acquisition of International Royalty Corporation, net of cash acquired

  (270,233)    
 

Proceeds from royalty restructuring

    34,897   
 

Change in restricted cash—compensating balance

  19,250  (3,500)  
 

Proceeds on sale of Inventory—restricted

  3,647  3,477  1,077 
 

Deferred acquisition costs

  (120) (1,021) (157)
 

Other

  (86) (284) (42)
        

Net cash used in investing activities

 $(480,538)$(152,541)$(18,301)
        

Cash flows from financing activities:

          
 

Borrowings from credit facilities

  255,000     
 

Tax benefit of stock-based compensation exercises

  1,638  334  722 
 

(Prepayment of) borrowings under Chilean loan facility

  (19,250) 3,500   
 

Common stock dividends

  (14,628) (10,242) (8,253)
 

Preferred stock dividends

      (2,802)
 

Repayment of debt

  (36,013)    
 

Proceeds from foreign exchange contract

  4,101     
 

Distribution to non-controlling interests

  (3,647) (3,477) (1,077)
 

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock

  276,839  235,707  698 
 

Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock

      111,098 
 

Stock repurchase program

      (5,516)
 

Gold loan payoff—Battle Mountain

      (6,476)
 

Debt issuance costs

  (1,593) (797) (27)
        

Net cash provided by financing activities

 $462,447 $225,025 $88,367 
        

Net increase in cash and equivalents

  30,280  102,531  109,193 
        

Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

  294,566  192,035  82,842 
        

Cash and equivalents at end of period

 $324,846 $294,566 $192,035 
        
See Note 11 for supplemental cash flow information.

See Note 12 for supplemental cash flow information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


69


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.OPERATIONS, SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Operations

1.     THE COMPANY

Royal Gold, Inc. (“("Royal Gold”Gold", the “Company”"Company", “we”"we", “us”,"us" or “our”"our"), together with its subsidiaries, is engaged in the business of acquiring and managing precious metals royalties.royalties and similar interests. Royalties are passive (non-operating) interests in mining projects that provide the right to revenue or production from the project after deducting specified costs, if any.

We seek to acquire existing royalties and to create new royalties through the financing of mining, development or exploration projects in exchange for royalty interest. Substantially all of our revenues are and will be expected to be derived from royalty interests. We do not conduct mining operations.

2.     SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS, AND RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Basis of Consolidation:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Royal Gold, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries and an entity over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (see Note 15).rights. The Company follows Financialthe Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”Codification ("ASC") Interpretation No. 46(R),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which provides guidance on thefor identification and reporting for entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights. The guidance defines such entities as Variable Interest Entities ("VIEs"). As discussed further in Note 16, the Company identified Crescent Valley Partners, L.P. ("CVP") as a VIE due to the legal structure and certain related factors. Also refer to Note 3 for further discussion of a VIE identified as part of the acquisition of International Royalty Corporation ("IRC"). The identified VIEs are not material to the Company's overall operations or consolidated balance sheets either individually or in the aggregate. Intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Equivalents:

We consider

        Cash and equivalents consist of all cash balances and highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2009, cashless. Cash and equivalents wereare primarily held in cash deposit accounts or money market accounts which are invested in United States treasury bills or United States treasury backed securities. As of June 30, 2009, approximately $284.8 million of our total cash and equivalents was held in money market funds through accounts at one financial institution.

Royalty Interests in Mineral Properties:

Royalty interests in mineral properties include acquired royalty interests in production, stage, development stage and exploration stage properties. The fair valuecost of acquired royalty interests in mineral properties are capitalized as tangible assets as such interests do not meet the definition of a financial asset under the FASB Statement of Financial Account Standards (“SFAS”) No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125, or a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Also, in accordance with FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No., or EITF, 04- 02, Working Group Report No.1,Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets and Related Issues.

70

ASC guidance.


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Acquisition costs of production stage royalty interests are depleted using the units of production method over the life of the mineral property, which is estimated using proven and probable reserves as provided by the operator. Acquisition costs of royalty interests on development stage mineral


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


properties, thatwhich are not yet in production, are not amortized until the property begins production. Acquisition costs of royalty interests on exploration stage mineral properties, where there are no proven and probable reserves, are not amortized. At such time as the associated exploration stage mineral interests are converted to proven and probable reserves, the cost basis is amortized over the remaining life of the mineral property, using proven and probable reserves. Exploration costs are charged to operations when incurred.

Asset Impairment:

We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The recoverability of the carrying value of royalty interests in production and development stage mineral properties is evaluated based upon estimated future undiscounted net cash flows from each royalty interest property using estimates of proven and probable reserves and other relevant information received from the operator. We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying value of royalty interests in exploration stage mineral properties in the event of significant decreases in the price of gold and other metals, and whenever new information regarding the mineral properties is obtained from the operator indicating that production will not likely occur in the future, thus affecting the future recoverability of our royalty interests. Impairments in the carrying value of each property are measured and recorded to the extent that the carrying value in each property exceeds its estimated fair value, which is generally calculated using estimated future discounted cash flows.

Our estimates of gold, silver, copper and other metal prices, operator’soperator's estimates of proven and probable reserves related to our royalty properties, and operator’soperator's estimates of operating, capital and reclamation costs are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which may affect the recoverability of our investment in these royalty interests in mineral properties. Although we have made our best assessment of these factors based on current conditions, it is possible that changes could occur, which could adversely affect the net cash flows expected to be generated from these royalty interests.

Royalty Revenue:

Royalty revenue is recognized in accordance with the guidance of ASC 605 and based upon amounts contractually due pursuant to guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104,Revenue Recognition for Financial Statements. Revenuethe underlying royalty agreement. Specifically, revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of the underlying royalty agreements subject to (i) the persuasivepervasive evidence of the existence of the arrangements; (ii) the risks and rewards having been transferred; (iii) the royalty being fixed or determinable; and (iv) the collectability of the royalty being reasonably assured. For royalty payments received in gold, royalty revenue is recorded at the average spot price of gold for the period in which the royalty was earned.

Revenue recognized pursuant to the Robinson royalty agreement is based upon 3.0% of revenue received by the operator of the mine, QuadraQuadraFNX Mining, Ltd. (“Quadra”("Quadra"), for the sale of minerals from the Robinson mine, reduced by certain costs incurred by Quadra. Quadra’sQuadra's concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, in general, provide for an initial sales price payment based upon provisional assays and quoted metal prices at the date of shipment. Final true uptrue-up sales price payments to Quadra are subsequently based upon final assaysassay and market metal prices set on a specified future date, typically one to three months after the date the concentrate arrives at the third-party smelter (which generally occurs four to five months after the shipment date from the Robinson mine).

Royal Gold recognizes revenue under We do not have all the Robinson royalty agreement based on amounts contractually due pursuantkey information regarding the terms of the operator's smelter contracts, such as the terms of specific concentrate shipments to a smelter or quantities of metal or expected settlement arrangements at the calculations above for the underlying sale. As a resulttime of pricing variations in gold,an operator's shipment of concentrate.


71

Table of Contents



ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

silver (Continued)

        Each monthly payment from Quadra is typically a combination of revenue received by Quadra for provisional payments during the month and copper overany upward or downward adjustments for final assays and commodity prices for earlier shipments. Whether the respective settlement period,payment to Royal Gold is based on Quadra's revenue in the form of provisional or final payments, Royal Gold records royalty revenue recognizedand the corresponding receivable based on the Robinsonmonthly amounts it receives from Quadra, as determined pursuant to the royalty could be positivelyagreement. The royalty contract does not provide Royal Gold with rights or negatively impactedobligations to settle any final assay and commodity price adjustments with Quadra. Therefore, once a given monthly payment is received by any changes in metal prices betweenRoyal Gold it is not subject to later adjustment based on adjustments for assays or commodity prices. Under the provisional androyalty agreement, Quadra may include such final settlement periods.

adjustments as a component of future royalty payments.

Income Taxes:

The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes,and FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”),Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An interpretationaccordance with the guidance of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in the application of the income tax laws to the Company’s operations.ASC 740. The Company adopted FIN 48 on July 1, 2007. Please refer to Note 10 for a discussion regarding the effect of adopting FIN 48.

The Company’sCompany's deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts measured by tax laws and regulations. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets when management concludes it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

        The Company's operations may involve dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in multiple jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state, and international tax audits. The Company recognizes potential liabilities and records tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on its estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If the Company's estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, an additional charge to income tax expense would result. If the estimate of tax liabilities proves to be greater than the ultimate assessment, a tax benefit would result. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Stock-Based Compensation:

We account for our stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment, (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) requiresthe guidance of ASC 718. The Company recognizes all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, stock appreciation rights ("SARs") and restricted stock, to be recognized in theits financial statements based onupon their fair values. See Note 67 for further discussion on the Company’sCompany's stock-based compensation.

Operating Segments and Geographical Information:

We manage our business under one operating segment, consisting of royalty acquisition and management activities. All of our assets and revenues are attributable to the royalty operating segment.

Royal Gold’sGold's royalty revenue and long-lived assets (royalty interests in mineral


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


properties, net) are geographically distributed as shown in the following table. Please refer to Note 35 for a further breakdown of our royalty interests on producing mineral properties.

                        
 Royalty Interests in Royalty Revenue Royalty Interests in Mineral Property, net 
 Royalty Revenue Mineral Properties, net Fiscal Year Ended
June 30,
 Fiscal Year Ended
June 30,
 
 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 
United States  56%  79%  97%  13%  18%  25% 40% 56% 79% 5% 13% 18%

Africa(1)

 29% 21% 11% 2% 8% 12%
Mexico  15%  4%  2%  45%  55%  49% 15% 15% 4% 13% 45% 55%

Australia

 5% 2%  6% 6%  
Canada  2%  1%   19%  1%   4% 2% 1% 27% 19% 1%
Africa(1)
  21%  11%   8%  12%  16%
Chile  1%    6%  7%  10% 4% 1%  42% 6% 7%
Other(2)
  5%  5%  1%  9%  7%  

Other

 3% 3% 5% 5% 3% 7%

(1)
Consists of royalties on properties in Burkina Faso and Guinea.
(1)Consists of royalties on properties in Burkina Faso, the Republic of Ghana and Guinea.
(2)The “Other” category for “Royalty revenue” consists of revenue from Argentina, Australia (2009 only), Bolivia (2009 and 2008 only) and Nicaragua (2009 and 2008 only). The “Other” category for “Royalty Interests in Mineral Properties, net” for 2009 and 2008 consists of assets in Australia, Bolivia, Colombia, Honduras and Nicaragua.

72


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comprehensive Income:

In addition to net income, comprehensive income includes changes in equity during a period associated with cumulative unrealized changes in the fair value of marketable securities held for sale, net of tax effects.

Earnings Perper Share:

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income or lossavailable to common stockholders by the basic weighted average number of outstanding common shares for the period, including the outstanding during each fiscal year.exchangeable shares (see Note 10). Diluted earnings per share reflectsreflect the effectpotential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts that may require issuance of all potentially dilutive stock-based compensation awards andcommon shares were converted. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or lossavailable to common stockholders by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding, including outstanding exchangeable shares, during each fiscal year.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Subsequent Events

The Accounting Standards Codification

In MayJune 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165,Subsequent Events, (“SFAS 165”Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"). SFAS 165 is intended to establish general standards established the ASC as the single source of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, SFAS 165 sets for the period after the balance sheet during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that my occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods after June 15, 2009. We adopted SFAS 165 effective June15, 2009, and have evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2009, through August 21, 2009, the date the Company issued these financial statements.

Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,”(“SFAS 162”) which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the accounting framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of non-governmental entities that are presented in conformity with U.S.authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”("GAAP"). SFAS 162 to be applied by non-governmental entities. The ASC is the new structure which took existing accounting pronouncements and organized them by topic. Relevant authoritative literature issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and select SEC staff interpretations and administrative literature was also included in the ASC. All other accounting not included in the ASC is non-authoritative. The ASC was effective November 15, 2008, which was 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with GAAP.”The adoption of SFAS 162 has had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 were adopted by the Company on July 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 during our first fiscal quarter of 2009 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB staff issued Staff Position No. 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,(“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-2 delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The provisions of FSP 157-2 are effective for the

73


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company’s fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009; however, the Company does not expect the provisions to have a material impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements when adopted.
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s financial liabilities are not within the scope of the provisions of SFAS 157.
                 
  Fair Value at June 30, 2009 (In thousands) 
  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Assets:                
Money market investments(1)
 $283,545  $283,545  $  $ 
Restricted cash  19,250   19,250       
Marketable equity securities(2)
  117   117       
             
  $302,912  $302,912  $  $ 
             
(1)Included inCash and equivalentsin the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
(2)Included inOther assetsin the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The Company invests in money market funds, which are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. The Company’s money market funds, which are invested in United States treasury bills or United States treasury backed securities, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s restricted cash, which is included inRestricted cash — compensating balancein the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, is invested in a money market fund which is traded by dealers or brokers in an active over-the-counter market. The Company’s restricted cash is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s marketable equity securities classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using quoted market prices in active markets. The fair value of the Level 1 marketable equity securities is calculated as the quoted market price of the marketable equity security multiplied by the quantity of shares held by the Company.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company also had assets that, under certain conditions, are subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis like those associated with royalty interests in mineral properties, intangible assets and other long-lived assets. For these assets, measurement at fair value at acquisition or in periods subsequent to their initial recognition are applicable if any of these assets are determined to be impaired; however, no impairment losses have occurred relative to any of these assets

74


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. If recognition of these assets at their fair value becomes necessary, such measurements will be determined utilizing Level 3 inputs.
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”(“SFAS 159”), which allows entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value, with the objective of improving financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The provisions of SFAS 159 were adopted by the Company July 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the Fair Value Option for any of its financial assets or liabilities, and therefore, the adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards
In June 2007, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 06-11 “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards.”EITF Issue No. 06-11 requires that the tax benefit related to dividend and dividend equivalents paid on equity-classified, non-vested shares and non-vested share units, which are expected to vest, be recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. EITF No. 06-11 was applied prospectively for tax benefits on dividends declared in our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2008.2009. The adoption of EITF 06-11 had an insignificant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Codification
In June 2009, FASB issued Statement No. 168, “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles(“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 will replace SFAS 162 and establishes only two levels of U.S. GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the source of authoritative, non-governmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literatureASC did not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009, or the Company’s first fiscal quarter of 2010. We will begin to use the new guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it will not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”(“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 amends certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. SFAS 167 is effective for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010. We are evaluating the impact, if any, SFAS 167 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

75


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Derivative Instruments
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161,“Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”(“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 intends to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 also requires disclosure about an entity’s strategy and objectives for using derivatives, the fair values of derivative instruments and their related gains and losses. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, and will be applicable to the Company’s fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 161 to have an impact on itsthe Company's consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations

In December 2007,

        On July 1, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007),“Business Combinations”(“SFAS 141R”), which significantlyCompany adopted a new accounting standard included in ASC 805. The new accounting standard changes the waysway companies account for business combinations and will generally


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


require more assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be measured at their acquisition date fair value. Under SFAS 141R,The new accounting standard also requires legal fees and other transaction-related costs areto be expensed as incurred and are no longer included in goodwill as a costincurred. The adoption of acquiring the business. SFAS 141R also requires, among other things, acquirers to estimate the acquisition date fair value of any contingent consideration and to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration in earnings. In addition, restructuring costs the acquirer expected, but was not obligated to incur, will be recognized separately from the business acquisition. SFAS 141R is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009, andnew accounting standard is to be applied prospectively for any business combinationcombinations which would close after the effective date of SFAS 141R.

July 1, 2009 (see Note 3).

Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements

Also

        On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard included in December 2007,ASC 810. The adoption of the FASB issued Statement No. 160,“Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendmentnew accounting standard changed the presentation of ARB No. 51”(“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 requires all entities to reportits non-controlling interests in subsidiaries as a separate component(minority) interests. Except for presentation changes, the adoption of equity in the new accounting standard had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 establishesposition, results of operations or cash flows.

Fair Value Measurements

        On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted a single method ofnew accounting standard in ASC 820, which delayed the effective date for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiarydisclosing all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that do not result in deconsolidation. Companies will no longer recognize a gainare recognized or loss on partial disposals of a subsidiary where control is retained. In addition, in partial acquisitions, where control is obtained, the acquiring company will recognize and measuredisclosed at fair value 100 percenton a recurring basis (at least annually). This standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 13 for a discussion regarding the assetsCompany's fair value measurements as of June 30, 2010.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Variable Interest Entities

        In June 2009, new accounting guidance was issued that is included in ASC 810. This guidance amends the consolidation guidance applicable to VIEs and liabilities, including goodwill, as if the entire target company had been acquired. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company’sour fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009,2010. We are evaluating the potential impact, if any, this new accounting guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements

        In January 2010, ASC 820 was updated to require additional disclosures related to: (1) transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements, and (2) enhanced detail in the Level 3 reconciliation. The new guidance was amended to provide clarity about the level of disaggregation required for assets and liabilities and the disclosures required for inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. The updated guidance is to be applied prospectively.effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010, with the exception of the Level 3 disaggregation, which is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011. We are evaluating the potential impact, if any, this new accounting guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

3.     ACQUISITION OF INTERNATIONAL ROYALTY CORPORATION

        On February 22, 2010, Royal Gold, through RG Exchangeco Inc. (formerly known as 7296355 Canada Ltd.), a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Royal Gold ("RG Exchangeco"), acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of IRC, a company incorporated in Canada (the "IRC Transaction"). IRC's royalty portfolio as of February 22, 2010, included 11 producing royalties, 10 development stage royalties, 24 evaluation stage royalties and 35 exploration stage royalties. The IRC Transaction further complemented and expanded our royalty portfolio.


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        The purchase price for the IRC Transaction consisted of approximately $350.0 million in cash, 5,234,086 shares of Royal Gold common stock (valued at $230.4 million on February 22, 2010) and 1,806,649 exchangeable shares of RG Exchangeco (valued at $79.5 million on February 22, 2010), which shares are convertible at any time on a one-for-one basis for Royal Gold common stock. As discussed in Note 6, the Company funded $225 million of the cash consideration portion of the purchase price from its existing debt facilities. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred approximately $8.6 million of transaction costs for financial advisory, legal, accounting, tax and consulting services as part of the IRC Transaction. The Company does not expectalso incurred approximately $10.8 million in severance related payments as part of the adoptiontermination of SFAS 162IRC's officers and certain employees upon acquisition of IRC. The transaction and severance payment costs are included inSeverance and acquisition-related costs on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and were recognized separately from the purchase price for the IRC Transaction.

        The Company followed the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with the new accounting standard related to havebusiness combinations, which the Company adopted on July 1, 2009 (see Note 2). The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from IRC on February 22, 2010, based on the current best estimates and information received by management. The Company is in the process of finalizing its assessment of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Royalty interests in mineral properties, deferred income taxes, and certain other tax matters were based on preliminary valuation data and estimates. Accordingly, the fair values of these assets and liabilities are subject to change. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company made certain changes to the purchase price allocation. These changes, when compared to our purchase price allocation as of March 31, 2010, were immaterial.

 
 (in thousands) 

Purchase price

 $659,871 
    

Current assets

 $83,720 

Royalty interests in mineral properties

  774,291 

Other assets

  14,304 

Current liabilities

  (10,839)

Senior secured debentures

  (28,769)

Net deferred tax liabilities

  (140,891)

Uncertain tax positions

  (8,362)

Other liabilities

  (2,878)

Non-controlling interest

  (20,705)
    

Total allocated purchase price

 $659,871 
    

        The non-controlling interest arising from the IRC Transaction is the result of IRC's indirect ownership of a financial impact90% interest in the Labrador Nickel Royalty Limited Partnership ("LNRLP"), which owns 100% of the Voisey's Bay Net Smelter Return ("NSR") royalty. The owner of the remaining 10% interest in LNRLP is Altius Resources Inc. ("Altius"), a company unrelated to Royal Gold and IRC. Due to the legal structure of LNRLP and certain related factors, the Company determined that LNRLP should be fully consolidated. The fair value of the non-controlling interest was determined based on its proportionate share to the underlying assets and liabilities of the partnership.

        The Company's consolidated financial statements.statements include the results of the IRC Transaction from the date of acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma information is presented as if the IRC Transaction had been completed as of the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma results


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


are not necessarily indicative of what would have been achieved had the IRC Transaction been in effect for the periods presented.

2.
 
 Fiscal Years Ended
June 30,
 
 
 2010 2009 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Royalty revenues

 $152,716 $113,259 

Net income (loss) available to Royal Gold common stockholders

 $(434)$29,248 

        For the period February 22, 2010, through June 30, 2010, approximately $9.0 million of royalty revenue was recorded on the Company's consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income related to royalties acquired in the IRC Transaction. Net income attributable to Royal Gold common stockholders included approximately $19.4 million in transaction costs and severance related payments related to the IRC Transaction.

4.     ROYALTY ACQUISITIONS

Proposed Acquisition of

Andacollo Production Interest

On April 3, 2009,January 25, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive agreement (“Master Agreement”) with a Chilean subsidiary of Teck Resources Limited (“Teck”), Compañía Minera Teck Carmen de Andacollo (“CDA”), to acquireacquired an interest in the gold produced from the sulfide portion of the Andacollo project in Chile (the “Andacollo Production Interest”from a Chilean subsidiary of Teck Resources Limited ("Teck"). We refer to this transaction throughout this report as the “Teck Transaction.”, Compañía Minera Teck Carmen de Andacollo. The purchase price for the Andacollo Production Interest consistsRoyalty consisted of $217.9 million in cash and 1,204,136 of the Company’sCompany's common shares.

76


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Andacollo Production Interest will equal 75% of the gold produced from the sulfidecash portion of the deposit atpurchase price was paid from the Company's cash on hand.

        The Andacollo mine until 910,000 payable ouncesRoyalty acquisition has been accounted for as an asset acquisition. As such, the total purchase price of gold have been sold and 50%$273.0 million, which consisted of $217.9 million in cash, 1,204,136 shares of the gold producedCompany's common stock (valued at $53.4 million on January 25, 2010) and approximately $1.7 million of transaction costs, is recorded as a development stage royalty, which is a component ofRoyalty interests in excess of 910,000 payable ounces of gold. The mine, located about 34 miles southeast of the city of La Serena, Chile, produces copper from the oxide portion of the deposit and Teck is currently constructing facilities to produce both copper and gold from the sulfide portion of the deposit. The Andacollo Production Interest will not cover copper production.

The operator estimates that the mine will producemineral properties, net on average approximately 53,000 ounces of gold and 76,000 tonnes (83,775 tons) of copper in concentrate annually for the first 10 years of commercial production, with an estimated mine life of 20 years. The mine is estimated to begin initial production of gold in the fourth quarter of calendar 2009, with commercial production at the mine to be achieved in the first half of calendar year 2010, unless this schedule is delayed by challenges to previously granted permits relating to CDA’s water supply, as recently announced by Teck.
Royal Gold’s obligation to close the Teck Transaction is subject to CDA’s completion of concentrate marketing for a specified percentage of its concentrate production from the Andacollo mine, the condition that CDA’s material government approvals are not withdrawn or challenged, and completion of certain limited due diligence satisfactory to Royal Gold, as well as other customary closing conditions. Either party may terminate the definitive agreement if the closing conditions are not met by January 29, 2010.
Acquisition of our consolidated balance sheets.

Barrick Royalty Portfolio

Effective October 1, 2008, the Company completed an acquisition of royalties from Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”("Barrick") for cash of approximately $181.3 million, including a restructuring of its GSR2, GSR3 and NVR1 royalties at Cortez, valued at $31.5 million, for net cash of approximately $150.0 million. The transactions were completed pursuant toAs part of the Royalty Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 30,royalty restructuring, the Company recognized a gain of $31.5 million during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008. The cash portion of the purchase price was paid from the Company’sCompany's cash on hand.

Pursuant to the Barrick transaction, we acquired royalties on 72 properties in various stages of production, development, evaluation and exploration. The Company uses “evaluation stage” to describe exploration stage properties that contain mineralized material and on which operators are engaged in the search for reserves. Please refer to Note 3 for a further discussion on the key royalty assets acquired from Barrick.
The restructuring of Royal Gold’s royalty positions at Cortez consisted of: (1) a reduction of the Company’s GSR2 sliding-scale royalty (ranging from 0.72% to 9.0%) to match the current GSR1 sliding-scale royalty rate (ranging from 0.40% to 5.0%) and (2) the elimination of Royal Gold’s interest in the 0.71% GSR3 royalty and the 0.39% NVR1 royalty on the mining claims that comprise the undeveloped Crossroads deposit. The GSR3 and NVR1 royalties that cover areas outside the Crossroads deposit at Cortez were not affected by this transaction. The Crossroads deposit continues to be subject to the Company’s GSR2 royalty at the rate of 0.4% to 5.0%.

The acquisition of Barrick’sBarrick's royalty portfolio has been accounted for as a purchase of assets using the purchase method of accounting.an asset acquisition. The total purchase price of $181.3 million, plus direct transaction costs of approximately $3.2$3.1 million, has been allocated to the acquired royalty interests according to their relative fair values and is recorded as separate components ofRoyalty Interestsinterests in Mineral Propertiesmineral properties, neton our consolidated balance sheets.

        The amounts allocated tooperating impacts of the acquired royalty interests in mineral properties acquired from Barrick are preliminary and are subject to change upon completionhave been reflected in the financial results of final valuations based upon receiptRoyal Gold from October 1, 2008.


Table of updated reserve information expected to be received from certain operators.

77

Contents



ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Marigold and El Chanate

On February 20, 2008, we acquired three royalties from AngloGold Ashanti (U.S.A.) Exploration Inc. (“AngloGold’("AngloGold'), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AngloGold Ashanti North America Inc., for $13.75$13.8 million. The first royalty is a 2.0% net smelter return (“NSR”("NSR") royalty on the Marigold mine, located on the Battle Mountain-Eureka trend in Nevada, and operated by Goldcorp, Inc. (“Goldcorp”("Goldcorp"). The second royalty is a 2.0-4.0%2.0% to 4.0% sliding-scale NSR royalty on the El Chanate mine, located in Sonora, Mexico, and operated by Capital Gold, Inc. (“("Capital Gold”Gold"). The sliding-scale NSR royalty is capped once payments of approximately $17.0 million have been received. The third royalty is a 10.0% net profits interest (“NPI”("NPI") royalty, also on the El Chanate mine. The 10.0% NPI royalty at El Chanate is capped at $1.0 million.

The sliding-scale NSR royalty at El Chanate pays at a rate of 2.0% when the average gold price is below $300 per ounce, 3.0% when the gold price is between $300 and $350 per ounce, and 4.0% when the gold price is above $350 per ounce. The El Chanate mine commenced production in mid-calendar year 2007.

        As of June 30, 2009,2010, approximately $14.7$12.4 million remains under the $17.0 million sliding-scale NSR royalty cap. In March 2009, the Company received $1.0 million from Capital Gold as payment for the NPI royalty, and, as such, the cap has been reached and the royalty is no longer effective.

The 2.0% NSR royalty interest on the Marigold mine covers the majority of six sections of land, containing a number of open pits, but does not cover the current mining in the Basalt/Antler area. Approximately 45% of the current Marigold reserves are covered by this royalty. Based on Goldcorp’s guidance, we expect to begin receiving royalty payments from the 2.0% NSR royalty on the Marigold mine in calendar year 2011, when mine operations are expected to move into areas covered by our royalty interest.

The AngloGold transaction has been accounted for as a purchase of assets. The total purchase price of $13.75$13.8 million, less royalty amounts received for production prior to the purchase date of $0.15$0.2 million, plus direct transaction costs, has been allocated to the three acquired royalties according to their relative fair values, as separate components ofRoyalty Interests in Mineral Propertieson our consolidated balance sheets. Accordingly, $7.5 million has beenwas allocated to the sliding-scale NSR royalty at El Chanate, $0.8 million has beenwas allocated to the NPI royalty at El Chanate, and $5.3 million has beenwas allocated to the Marigold royalty.

Acquisition of

Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corp.

On July 30, 2007, we entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”"Merger Agreement") with Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corp. (“("Battle Mountain”Mountain") and Royal Battle Mountain, Inc. (“("Merger Sub”Sub"), a newly-formed and wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Gold, pursuant to which the Merger Sub was merged into Battle Mountain with Battle Mountain surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Gold.

On October 24, 2007, we completed the merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement and acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Battle Mountain in a transaction whereby the Merger Sub was merged with and into Battle Mountain for aggregate consideration consisting of 1.14 million shares of our common stock and approximately $3.4 million in cash. As part of the acquisition of Battle Mountain, we acquired thirteen royalty interests in various stages of production, development or exploration.

Immediately prior to the merger, Royal Gold owned approximately 18% of Battle Mountain’sMountain's outstanding common stock and accounted for this ownership under the equity method, which resulted in the Company recognizing a loss from equity investment of approximately $0.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.

78


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On September 13, 2006, an action was filed against Battle Mountain and its former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mark Kucher, by James E. McKay, a former officer and director of Battle Mountain, in the second Judicial Court of the State of Nevada. The action sought to enforce alleged rights to certain shares of Battle Mountain common stock and options to purchase shares of Battle Mountain common stock pursuant to a stock option agreement and a stock option plan, and unspecified damages. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, merger consideration of 37,418 shares of Royal Gold common stock and approximately $0.1 million in cash was held back from the Battle Mountain stockholders, to be paid to former Battle Mountain stockholders upon settlement of this litigation, after deducting certain litigation costs.
On March 4, 2009, all parties agreed to a settlement pursuant to which all parties dismissed all claims and counterclaims with prejudice, Battle Mountain paid Mr. McKay cash of approximately $0.9 million, and Mr. McKay surrendered his original Battle Mountain stock certificates and share option agreement. In May 2009, the Company issued, from the merger consideration holdback, 22,229 shares of common stock to former stockholders of Battle Mountain who elected at the time of the merger to receive stock merger consideration, and paid approximately $0.1 million in cash to former stockholders of Battle Mountain who elected to receive cash merger consideration.
The acquisition of Battle Mountain has been accounted for as an asset acquisition using the purchase method of accounting, whereby assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair market values as of the date of acquisition. The purchase price was calculated using the fair market value of the Royal Gold common shares issued, as of the date we completed the transaction, plus cash and direct acquisition costs paid by Royal Gold.

During the fiscal year 2009, we finalized our purchase accounting for the Battle Mountain acquisition. As such, we have allocated the purchase price of approximately $65.8 million to the fair market values of the


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including $85.3 million to royalty interests in mineral properties, $2.2 million to current assets, $5.8 million to intangible assets (included withinOther assetson theour consolidated balance sheets)sheets), $3.9 million to deferred tax assets, $6.5 million to a gold loan payable, $24.4 million to deferred tax liabilities resulting from the acquisition and $0.5 million of other liabilities. The operating impact of the assets acquired from Battle Mountain have been reflected in the results of Royal Gold from October 24, 2007.

The intangible asset included as part of the purchase price is associated with non-compete agreements with the two former employees of Battle Mountain. For fiscal years 20092010 and 2008,2009, the total amortization expense associated with the intangible asset was approximately $1.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively.million. The remaining carrying value associated with the intangible asset is approximately $2.5$0.6 million as of June 30, 2009,2010, which will be amortized over the first two quarters of our next one and a half fiscal years.

79

2011.


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3.5.     ROYALTY INTERESTS IN MINERAL PROPERTIES

The following summarizes the Company’sCompany's principal royalty interests in mineral properties as of June 30, 20092010 and June 30, 2008.2009.

             
      Accumulated    
As of June 30, 2009 (Amounts in thousands): Cost  Depletion  Net 
Production stage royalty interests:            
Cortez $10,630  $(9,192) $1,438 
Robinson  17,825   (6,238)  11,587 
Taparko  33,570   (10,709)  22,861 
Leeville  18,322   (8,246)  10,076 
Goldstrike  20,788   (10,247)  10,541 
Mulatos  34,214   (5,618)  28,596 
Peñasquito (oxide circuit)  4,026   (591)  3,435 
Dolores  44,878   (607)  44,271 
Siguiri  10,946   (3,659)  7,287 
Allan  22,020   (100)  21,920 
Other  44,658   (18,337)  26,321 
          
   261,877   (73,544)  188,333 
Development stage royalty interests:            
Peñasquito (sulfide circuit)  95,146      95,146 
Canadian Malartic  34,031      34,031 
Pascua-Lama  20,446      20,446 
Holt  9,453      9,453 
Other  18,290      18,290 
          
   177,366      177,366 
Exploration stage royalty interests  90,267      90,267 
          
Total royalty interests in mineral properties $529,510  $(73,544) $455,966 
          
As of June 30, 2010
(Amounts in thousands):
 Cost Accumulated
Depletion
 Net 

Production stage royalty interests:

          
 

Andacollo

 $272,998 $(1,143)$271,855 
 

Voisey's Bay

  150,138  (2,052) 148,086 
 

Peñasquito(1)

  99,172  (2,162) 97,010 
 

Las Cruces

  57,230  (490) 56,740 
 

Mulatos

  48,092  (10,177) 37,915 
 

Dolores

  44,878  (2,278) 42,600 
 

Taparko

  33,570  (29,242) 4,328 
 

Leeville

  18,322  (10,764) 7,558 
 

Robinson

  17,825  (7,678) 10,147 
 

Gwalia Deeps

  15,970  (416) 15,554 
 

Cortez

  10,630  (9,499) 1,131 
 

Other

  149,085  (49,285) 99,800 
        

  917,910  (125,186) 792,724 

Development stage royalty interests:

          
 

Pascua-Lama

  315,610    315,610 
 

Canadian Malartic

  35,500    35,500 
 

Wolverine

  39,794    39,794 
 

Other

  50,733    50,733 
        

  441,637    441,637 

Exploration stage royalty interests

  
233,622
  
  
233,622
 
        

Total royalty interests in mineral properties

 $1,593,169 $(125,186)$1,467,983 
        
             
      Accumulated    
As of June 30, 2008 (Amounts in thousands): Cost  Depletion  Net 
Production stage royalty interests:            
Cortez $10,630  $(8,901) $1,729 
Robinson  17,825   (4,271)  13,554 
Taparko  33,570   (4,514)  29,056 
Leeville  17,495   (5,567)  11,928 
Goldstrike  20,788   (8,641)  12,147 
Mulatos  7,442   (1,439)  6,003 
Peñasquito (oxide circuit)  4,026   (22)  4,004 
Other  29,314   (10,137)  19,177 
          
   141,090   (43,492)  97,598 
Development stage royalty interests:            
Peñasquito (sulfide circuit)  95,146      95,146 
Dolores  40,989      40,989 
Pascua-Lama  20,446      20,446 
Other  18,110      18,110 
          
   174,691      174,691 
Exploration stage royalty interests  28,652   (271)  28,381 
          
Total royalty interests in mineral properties $344,433  $(43,763) $300,670 
          

Note:
The cost amount shown for the royalties acquired as part of the IRC Transaction are preliminary. This includes Voisey's Bay, the additional interest at Pascua-Lama, Wolverine and certain royalties included within the Other category in the above table.

(1)
Includes the value for the oxide and sulfide circuits.

80

Table of Contents



ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

As discussed in Note 2, effective October 1, 2008, the Company acquired a royalty portfolio from Barrick which consisted
As of June 30, 2009
(Amounts in thousands):
 Cost Accumulated
Depletion
 Net 

Production stage royalty interests:

          
 

Dolores

 $44,878 $(607)$44,271 
 

Mulatos

  34,214  (5,618) 28,596 
 

Taparko

  33,570  (10,709) 22,861 
 

Goldstrike

  20,788  (10,247) 10,541 
 

Leeville

  18,322  (8,246) 10,076 
 

Robinson

  17,825  (6,238) 11,587 
 

Siguiri

  10,946  (3,659) 7,287 
 

Cortez

  10,630  (9,192) 1,438 
 

Peñasquito (oxide circuit)

  4,026  (591) 3,435 
 

Other

  66,678  (18,437) 48,241 
        

  261,877  (73,544) 188,333 

Development stage royalty interests:

          
 

Peñasquito (sulfide circuit)

  95,146    95,146 
 

Canadian Malartic

  34,031    34,031 
 

Pascua-Lama

  20,446    20,446 
 

Other

  27,743    27,743 
        

  177,366    177,366 

Exploration stage royalty interests

  
90,267
  
  
90,267
 
        

Total royalty interests in mineral properties

 $529,510 $(73,544)$455,966 
        

6.     DEBT

        The Company's current and non-current long-term debt as of 72 properties in various stages of production, development, evaluation or exploration.

Key royalty assets acquired from Barrick:
Mulatos— A sliding-scale net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty on the Mulatos mine, located in Sonora, Mexico,June 30, 2010 and operated by a subsidiary of Alamos Gold, Inc. Prior to October 1, 2008, we owned a 0.30% to 1.50% NSR sliding-scale royalty on the property. The acquisition2009 consists of the Barrick royalty portfolio consolidated the Mulatos royaltyfollowing:

 
 As of June 30, 2010
(Amounts in thousands)
 As of June 30, 2009
(Amounts in thousands)
 
 
 Current Non-current Current Non-current 

Credit facility

 $ $125,000 $ $ 

Term loan

  26,000  97,500     

Chilean loan facility

        19,250 
          

Total debt

 $26,000 $222,500 $ $19,250 
          

        Scheduled minimum debt repayments are $26.0 million in fiscal years 2011 and increased our royalty interest to2012, $71.5 million in fiscal year 2013 and $125.0 million in fiscal year 2014.

Credit Facility

        The Company maintains a 1.0% to 5.0% sliding-scale NSR royalty. The royalty rate is 5.0% at a gold price of $400 per ounce or higher.

The Mulatos royalty is currently in production and is classified as a production stage royalty interest, which is depleted using the units of production method. A portion (non-reserve) of our investment in Mulatos is classified as an exploration stage royalty interest, which is not subject to depletion. In the event that future proven and probable reserves associated with the non-reserve portion of our royalty interest is developed at Mulatos, additional cost basis of our royalty interest will be reclassified to a development stage or a production stage royalty interest in future periods, as appropriate.
Canadian Malartic— A 2.0% to 3.0% sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Canadian Malartic gold project, located in Quebec, Canada, and owned by Osisko Mining Corporation (“Osisko”). The royalty rate is 3.0% at a gold price of $350 per ounce or higher. The Malartic royalty is associated with proven and probable reserves but is not currently in production and is therefore classified as a development stage royalty interest, which is not subject to depletion. The royalty is subject to a buy-down right, which if exercised by Osisko would lower the sliding-scale NSR royalty to a range of 1.0% to 1.5%.
Siguiri— A sliding-scale NSR royalty currently paying 1.875% on the Siguiri gold mine, located in Guinea, West Africa, and operated by AngloGold Ashanti. The Siguiri royalty is currently in production and is classified as a production stage royalty interest, which is depleted using a units of production method.
Holt— A sliding-scale NSR royalty on the Holt portion of the Holloway-Holt mining project located in Ontario, Canada and owned 100% by St Andrew Goldfields Ltd. (“St Andrew”).. The Holt royalty is currently classified as a development stage royalty interest, which is not subject to depletion.
4. CREDIT FACILITY
On October 30, 2008, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, High Desert Mineral Resources, Inc. (“High Desert”) and RG Mexico, Inc. (“RG Mexico”), entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”)$125 million revolving credit facility with HSBC Bank USA, National Association (“("HSBC Bank”Bank"), as administrative agent and a lender, Scotiabanc Inc., as a lender, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. (“HSBC Securities”), as sole lead arranger and Bank of Nova Scotia, as sole syndication agent.lenders. The Credit Agreement replaced the Company’s $80 million revolving credit facility with HSBC Bank.
The Credit Agreement provides the Company a $125 million revolving credit facility withhas a maturity date of October 30, 2013. Borrowings under the credit facility will bear interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%, based on the Company’sCompany's leverage ratio, (as defined). Unlike the prior credit facility, availability under the new credit facility is not limited by a borrowing base formula.
The royalties securing the new credit facility consist of the GSR1, GSR2, GSR3, and NVR1 royalties at Cortez and the royalties at Goldstrike, Leeville, Robinson, Dolores, Peñasquito and Mulatos (the “Collateral Royalties”). In addition to the Collateral Royalties,as defined in the credit facility is secured by 100%agreement. As of June 30, 2010, the Company's floating rate of LIBOR plus the spread was


81

Table of Contents



ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Royal Gold’s equity interests in High Desert and RG Mexico and substantially all (Continued)


2.70%. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $125 million outstanding under the credit facility, which was due to the partial funding of the presentIRC Transaction as discussed in Note 3. The Company has financial covenants associated with its revolving credit facility, which are similar to the financial covenants of our Term Loan as discussed below. At June 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with each financial covenant.

Term Loan

        In connection with the IRC Transaction described in Note 3, on January 20, 2010, we entered into an agreement to obtain a new $100 million term loan from HSBC Bank (the "Term Loan") to partially fund the IRC Transaction. The Term Loan was funded on February 17, 2010 in conjunction with the closing of the IRC Transaction. HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. acted as sole lead arranger for the Term Loan. The Term Loan was scheduled to mature 18 months from the funding date with principal repayments equal to 10% of the funded amount scheduled to occur every three months, beginning three months after funding, and future personal property andwith interest to accrue at LIBOR plus 2.25%. The Term Loan is guaranteed by three wholly-owned subsidiaries of Royal Gold (the "Guarantors"). The obligations under the Term Loan were secured by certain Canadian assets of Royal Gold that have been replaced with certain Chilean assets of Royal Gold as of July 19, 2010.

        On March 26, 2010, the Company High Desertamended the Term Loan with HSBC Bank and RG Mexico.the Bank of Nova Scotia joined the Term Loan as a lender. The Credit Agreementmodifications to the Term Loan included, among other things: (1) an increase in the principal balance available under the Term Loan from $100 million to $130 million; (2) an extension of the final maturity date from 18 to 36 months from the initial funding date of February 17, 2010; 3) increases in the applicable LIBOR margin (currently set at 2.25%) by 0.50% every six months, commencing 18 months after the initial funding date until maturity; and (4) a reduction in the amortization rate from 10% of the initial funded amount per quarter to 5% of the fully funded principal amount per quarter. The additional Term Loan proceeds were used to redeem the 5.5% senior secured debentures assumed by the Company as part of the IRC Transaction.

        The Term Loan contains covenants limiting the ability of Royal Gold and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur certain debt or liens, dispose of assets, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, make certain investments or consummate certain mergers, as well as a cross default provision to certain other permitted debt and royalty contracts. In addition, the Term Loan contains financial covenants requiring the Companyrelating to, maintainamong other things: (1) maintaining a leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement)defined) of 3.0 to 1.0 or less,less; (2) maintaining a minimum consolidated net worth (as defined in the Credit Agreement)defined) of not less than a base amount that increases according to cumulative positive quarterly net income available to Royal Gold common stockholders; (3) maintaining an interest coverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement)defined) of at leastgreater than 3.0 to 1.0,1.0; and (4) maintaining a current ratio (as defined indefined) for the Credit Agreement)periods ending March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 of at least 1.0 to 1.0, and for all times thereafter, of at least 1.5 to 1.0 and a facility coverage ratio (as defined1.0. At June 30, 2010, the Company was in the Credit Agreement) of at least 1.25 to 1.0.

compliance with each financial covenant. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008,2010, the Company did not have any amounts outstanding underCompany's rate of LIBOR plus the credit facility.
5. TERM LOAN FACILITY
margin was 2.68%.

Chilean Loan Facility

Royal Gold Chile Limitada (“RGCL”("RGCL"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Gold, had a $15.75$19.25 million term loan outstanding as of June 30, 2008, bearing interest at LIBOR plus 0.25% pursuant to a Term Loan Agreement between RGCL and HSBC Bank. On August 27, 2008, RGCL entered into an Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement (“(the "Amended and Restated Agreement") between RGCL and HSBC Bank. On September 23, 2009, RGCL prepaid the full $19.25 million outstanding, plus interest, under the Amended and Restated Agreement”) withAgreement. In addition to prepaying all outstanding amounts, RGCL


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


notified HSBC Bank of its intention to amendterminate the existing term loan facility. The Amended and Restated Agreement increased the maximum term loan principal amount from $15.75 million to $21.75 million, with such additional amounts available to be drawn at any time prior to October 1, 2008. Pursuant to the termsAgreement. Termination of the Amended and Restated Agreement Royal Gold must maintain a restricted interest-bearing securities account (the “Collateral Account”) on deposit at HSBC Securities with a balance equal to or in excess of the outstanding amounts on the term loan. Royal Gold entered into a Guarantee (the “Guarantee”) for the life of the term loan, for the benefit of HSBC Bank to guaranty RGCL’swas effective September 24, 2009.

        To secure RGCL's obligations under the Amended and Restated Agreement, andthe Company maintained $19.25 million in a security agreement granting HSBC Bank a security interest in the Collateral Account to secure RGCL’s obligations underat HSBC Bank. The Collateral Account balance was recorded asRestricted cash—compensating balance on the Term Loan AgreementCompany's consolidated balance sheets. Upon the full prepayment and its obligations under the Guarantee. The term loan will mature on March 1, 2012.

On September 19, 2008, RGCL drew an additional $3.5 million undertermination of the Amended and Restated Agreement, and Royal Gold securitized RGCL’s additional obligation under the Amended Agreement by depositing $3.5 million into the Collateral Account. As of June 30, 2009,Account was closed and the $19.25 million was outstanding under the term loan facility. The $2.5 million additional amount availablereclassified to be drawn under the Amended Agreement expired on October 1, 2008.
The $19.25 million balance in the Collateral Account as of June 30, 2009, is recorded asRestricted cash — compensating balanceCash and equivalentson the Company’sCompany's consolidated balance sheets. RGCL’s $19.25 million principal obligation under the Amended and Restated Agreement is recorded asNote payableon the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
6.

7.     STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

In November 2004, the Company adopted the Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (“("2004 Plan”Plan"). Under the 2004 Plan, 1,300,000 shares of Commoncommon stock are availablehave been authorized for future grants to officers, directors, key employees and other persons. The 2004 Plan provides for the grant of stock options, unrestricted stock, restricted stock, dividend equivalent rights, stock appreciation rights,SARs and cash awards. Any of these awards may, but need not, be made as performance incentives. Stock options granted under the 2004 Plan may be non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options.

For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded total

        The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to our equity compensation plans of $2.9 million, $2.9 million and $2.7 million,as follows:

 
 For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 

Stock options

 $733 $782 $1,252 

Stock appreciation rights

  520  200   

Restricted stock

  2,155  1,810  1,086 

Performance stock

  3,871  129  531 
        

Total stock-based compensation expense

 $7,279 $2,921 $2,869 
        

82


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
respectively.        Stock-based compensation expense is allocated among costcosts of operations, general and administrative, and exploration and business development in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as summarized below:

            
 For The Fiscal Years Ended June 30,  For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 
 (Amounts in thousands)  2010 2009 2008 
 2009 2008 2007  (Amounts in thousands)
 
Stock-based compensation expense allocation:  
Cost of operations $420 $356 $401 

Costs of operations

 $1,614 $420 $356 
General and administrative 1,598 1,509 1,510  3,793 1,598 1,509 
Exploration and business development 903 1,004 752  1,872 903 1,004 
              
Total stock-based compensation expense $2,921 $2,869 $2,663  $7,279 $2,921 $2,869 
              
The total income tax benefit associated with non-cash stock compensation expense was approximately $1.0 million for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007.

As of June 30, 2009,2010, there are 263,150were 77,450 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2004 Plan.

Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights

Stock option and SARs awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’sCompany's stock at the date of grant. Stock option and SARs awards granted to officers, key


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


employees and other persons vest based on one to three years of continuous service. Stock option and SARs awards have 10 year contractual terms.

Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. SARs granted to officers, key employees and other persons vest based on one to three years of continuous service. SARs granted have 10 year contractual terms and are settled in shares of Royal Gold common stock.

To determine stock-based compensation expense for stock options and SARs, the fair value of each stock option and SAR is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black-Scholes”("Black-Scholes") option pricing model for all periods presented. The Black-Scholes model requires key assumptions in order to determine fair value. Those key assumptions during our fiscal year 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 grants are noted in the following table:

             
  2009 2008 2007
Weighted average expected volatility  44.5%  47.8%  52.9%
Weighted average expected option term in years  5.3   5.0   5.1 
Weighted average dividend yield  0.92%  0.91%  0.93%
Weighted average risk free interest rate  2.5%  3.9%  4.6%
 
 2010 2009 2008 

Weighted-average expected volatility

  47.5% 44.5% 47.8%

Weighted-average expected life in years

  5.6  5.3  5.0 

Weighted-average dividend yield

  0.68% 0.92% 0.91%

Weighted-average risk free interest rate

  2.4% 2.5% 3.9%

The Company’sCompany's expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’sCompany's stock over the expected option term. The Company’sCompany's expected option term is determined by historical exercise patterns along with other known employee or company information at the time of grant. The risk free interest rate

83


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
is based on the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond at the time of grant with a term approximate to the expected option term.

Stock Options

A summary of stock option activity under our equity compensation plansthe 2004 Plan for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, is presented below (amounts in thousands except share data).

                 
          Weighted-    
          Average    
      Weighted-  Remaining    
      Average  Contractual  Aggregate 
      Exercise  Term  Intrinsic 
Stock Options Shares  Price  (Years)  Value 
Outstanding at July 1, 2008  586,713  $21.65         
Granted  24,000   30.96         
Exercised  (50,190)  15.38         
Forfeited and Expired  (1,833)  29.49         
               
Outstanding at June 30, 2009  558,690  $22.59   6.0  $10,673 
             
Exercisable at June 30, 2009  484,857  $21.47   4.8  $9,803 
             
 
 Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at July 1, 2009

  558,690 $22.59       

Granted

  21,060 $53.00       

Exercised

  (242,820)$21.37       
            

Outstanding at June 30, 2010

  336,930 $25.36  5.6 $7,732 
          

Exercisable at June 30, 2010

  283,204 $22.74  5.1 $7,153 
          

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, was $23.21, $12.28 and 2007, was $12.28, $12.82, and $13.79, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and 2007, were $6.2 million, $1.2 million, and $2.5 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

A summary of the status of the Company’sCompany's non-vested stock options for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, is presented below:

         
      Weighted-Average 
  Shares  Grant Date Fair Value 
Non-vested at July 1, 2008  148,167  $13.23 
Granted  24,000  $12.28 
Vested  (96,500) $12.83 
Forfeited  (1,833) $13.07 
       
Non-vested at June 30, 2009  73,834  $13.44 
       
 
 Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Non-vested at July 1, 2009

  73,834 $12.81 

Granted

  21,060 $23.21 

Vested

  (41,168)$12.97 
      

Non-vested at June 30, 2010

  53,726 $16.76 
      
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options of $0.8 million, $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

        As of June 30, 2009,2010, there was approximately $0.6 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options granted under our equity compensation plans,the 2004 Plan, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

84


SARs

ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SARs
A summary of SARs activity under our equity compensation plansthe 2004 Plan for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, is presented below (amounts in thousands except share data).

                 
          Weighted-    
          Average    
      Weighted-  Remaining    
      Average  Contractual  Aggregate 
      Exercise  Term  Intrinsic 
SARs Shares  Price  (Years)  Value 
Outstanding at July 1, 2008    $         
Granted  50,500   30.96         
Exercised              
Forfeited and Expired              
               
Outstanding at June 30, 2009  50,500  $30.96   9.3  $542 
             
Exercisable at June 30, 2009    $     $ 
             
 
 Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at July 1, 2009

  50,500 $30.96       

Granted

  51,640 $53.00       
            

Outstanding at June 30, 2010

  102,140 $42.10  8.9 $861 
          

Exercisable at June 30, 2010

  24,833 $30.96  8.4 $423 
          
There were no SARs granted during fiscal years 2008 and 2007.

        The weighted-average grant date fair value of SARs granted during the fiscal yearyears ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $12.28.

$22.94 and $12.28, respectively.

A summary of the status of the Company’sCompany's non-vested SARs for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, is presented below:

         
      Weighted-Average 
  Shares  Grant Date Fair Value 
Non-vested at July 1, 2008    $ 
Granted  50,500  $12.28 
Vested    $ 
Forfeited    $ 
       
Non-vested at June 30, 2009  50,500  $12.28 
       
 
 Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Non-vested at July 1, 2009

  50,500 $12.31 

Granted

  51,640 $22.94 

Vested

  (24,833)$30.96 
      

Non-vested at June 30, 2010

  77,307 $19.41 
      
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, we recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with SARs of $0.2 million.

        As of June 30, 2009,2010, there was approximately $0.4$1.1 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested SARs granted under our equity compensation plans,the 2004 Plan, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.52.1 years.


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Other Stock-based Compensation

Performance Shares

On November 5, 2008,18, 2009, officers and certain employees were granted 46,50053,000 shares of restricted common stock that can be earned only if either one of two defined multi-year performance goals is met within five years of the date of grant (“("Performance Shares”Shares"). If the performance goals are not earned by the end of this five year period, the Performance Shares will be forfeited. Vesting of Performance Shares is subject to certain performance measures being met and can be based on an interim earn out of 25%, 50%, 75% or 100%. The defined performance goals are tied to two different performance measures: (1) growth of free cash flow per share on a trailing twelve month basis; and (2) growth of royalty ounces in reserve per share on an annual basis.

85


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We measure the fair value of the Performance Shares based upon the market price of our common stock as of the date of grant. In accordance with SFAS 123(R),ASC 718, the measurement date for the Performance Shares will be determined at such time that the performance goals are attained or that it is probable they will be attained. At such time that it is probable that a performance condition will be achieved, compensation expense will be measured by the number of shares that will ultimately be earned based on the grant date market price of our common stock. Interim recognition of compensation expense will be made at such time as management can reasonably estimate the number of shares that will be earned.

A summary of the status of the Company’sCompany's non-vested Performance Shares for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, is presented below:

         
      Weighted-Average 
  Shares  Grant Date Fair Value 
Non-vested at July 1, 2008  66,000  $29.49 
Granted  46,500  $30.96 
Vested  (9,000) $28.78 
Forfeited  (2,250) $29.64 
       
Non-vested at June 30, 2009  101,250  $30.22 
       
 
 Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Non-vested at July 1, 2009

  101,250 $30.22 

Granted

  53,000 $53.00 

Vested

  (31,875)$29.88 
      

Non-vested at June 30, 2010

  122,375 $41.24 
      
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with our Performance Shares of approximately $0.1 million, $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

        As of June 30, 2009,2010, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to Performance Shares was approximately $0.8$1.5 million, which is expected to be recognized over the average remaining vesting period of 1.52.7 years.

Restricted Stock

As defined in the 2004 Plan, officers, non-executive directors and certain employees may be granted shares of restricted stock that vest on continued service alone (“("Restricted Stock”Stock"). On November 5, 2008,18, 2009, officers and certain employees were granted 79,00048,000 shares of Restricted Stock. Restricted Stock awards granted to officers and certain employees vest over three years beginning after a three-year holding period from the date of grant with one-third of the shares vesting in years four, five and six, respectively. Also on November 5, 2008,18, 2009, our non-executive directors were granted 17,50012,000 shares of Restricted Stock. The non-executive directors’directors' shares of Restricted Stock vest as to 50% immediately and 50% one year after the date of grant.


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Shares of Restricted Stock represent issued and outstanding shares of common stock, with dividend and voting rights. We measure the fair value of the Restricted Stock based upon the market price of our common stock as of the date of grant. Restricted Stock is amortized over the applicable vesting period using the straight-line method. Unvested shares of Restricted Stock are subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment with the Company.

86


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A summary of the status of the Company’sCompany's non-vested Restricted Stock for fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,2010, is presented below:

         
      Weighted-Average 
  Shares  Grant Date Fair Value 
Non-vested at July 1, 2008  193,250  $26.72 
Granted  96,500  $30.96 
Vested  (23,166) $26.51 
Forfeited  (6,000) $29.35 
       
Non-vested at June 30, 2009  260,584  $28.25 
       
 
 Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Non-vested at July 1, 2009

  260,584 $28.25 

Granted

  60,000 $53.00 

Vested

  (48,835)$29.57 
      

Non-vested at June 30, 2010

  271,749 $33.48 
      
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with the Restricted Stock of approximately $1.8 million, $1.1 million, and $0.4 million, respectively.

        As of June 30, 2009,2010, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to Restricted Stock was approximately $4.8$5.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining averageweighted-average vesting period of 3.254.2 years.

7.

8.     ROYALTY PORTFOLIO RESTRUCTURING GAIN

As part of the royalty restructuring as part of the Barrick acquisition, which is discussed in Note 2,4, the Company recognized a gain of $31.5 million during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008. The restructured royalties were a nonmonetary exchange and the fair value of the restructured royalties was determined based on expected future cash flows. The Company’sCompany's basis in the restructured royalties was zero thus giving rise to the $31.5 million gain.

In May 2009, Golden Star Resources Ltd. (“("Golden Star”Star") exercised its right of repurchase on the Benso 1.5% NSR royalty held by the Company for $3.4 million. The Company acquired the Benso royalty in December 2007 for approximately $1.9 million. The Company’sCompany's net book value for the Benso royalty on the date of exercise by Golden Star was approximately $1.2 million. As such, the Company recognized a gain of approximately $2.2 million upon exercise.

8. STOCKHOLDERS’

9.     STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Preferred Stock

We have 10,000,000 authorized and unissued shares of $.01 par value Preferred Stock as of June 30, 20092010 and 2008.

2009.

Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock

On November 9, 2007, the Company completed an offering of 1.15 million shares of 7.25% mandatory convertible preferred stock (“("Mandatory Preferred Stock”Stock") at a price to the public of $100.00 per share, less underwriter discounts and other related expenses, resulting in net proceeds of $111.1 million. Dividends on the Mandatory Preferred Stock were payable on a cumulative basis when, as and if declared by our board of directors at an annual rate of 7.25% per share on the liquidation preference of $100 per share. Dividends were payable, at the Company’sCompany's discretion, in cash, common


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


stock or a combination thereof, on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year to and including November 15, 2010, commencing on February 15, 2008. On January 10, 2008, the Company’sCompany's board of directors declared the regular quarterly dividend for the first dividend period of $1.9333 per share of the

87


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Mandatory Preferred Stock. The dividend was payable on February 15, 2008, to preferred shareholdersstockholders of record at the close of business on February 1, 2008. The preferred dividend was paid in cash.
Under the original terms of the Preferred Stock offering, each share of the Mandatory Preferred Stock was to automatically convert on November 15, 2010, into between 2.8335 and 3.4002 shares of our common stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments. At any time prior to November 15, 2010, holders may have elected to convert each share of the Mandatory Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock at the minimum conversion rate of 2.8335 shares of common stock per share of the Mandatory Preferred Stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments. At any time prior to May 15, 2008, we may have had, at our option, caused the conversion of all, but not less than all, of the Mandatory Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock at the provisional conversion rate described within the Mandatory Preferred Stock offering. However, we could not elect to exercise our provisional conversion right if, on or prior to May 15, 2008, we completed a material transaction involving the acquisition of assets or a business with a purchase price of $100 million or more.

On January 25, 2008, the Company announced that it exercised its provisional conversion right for all of the issued and outstanding shares of its Mandatory Preferred Stock. As part of the provisional conversion right, each share of the Mandatory Preferred Stock was converted into shares of our common stock on March 10, 2008 (the “Conversion Date”"Conversion Date"), based on the average closing price per common share on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”("NASDAQ") over a 20 consecutive trading day period, which ended on March 5, 2008, as provided in the Certificate of Designations of the Mandatory Preferred Stock. The average closing price over the 20 consecutive trading day period was $29.78 and each outstanding share of Mandatory Preferred Stock was automatically converted into 3.4589 shares of the Company's common stock on the Conversion Date. The Company issued 3,977,683 shares of its common stock upon conversion of the Mandatory Preferred Stock on the Conversion Date.

In connection with the conversion, all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Mandatory Preferred Stock up to the Conversion Date were payable at $0.5035 per share of Mandatory Preferred Stock and were paid in cash to holders of record on the Conversion Date. Trading of the Mandatory Preferred Stock on the NASDAQ was suspended at the close of business on March 5, 2008, and the Mandatory Preferred Stock was de-listeddelisted on March 24, 2008. The Company applied a contingent beneficial conversion feature model to account for the provisional conversion of the Mandatory Preferred Stock during its third fiscal quarter of 2008, which resulted in the Company recognizing a deemed dividend of $2.0 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2008. There were no tax consequences to the Company upon conversion of the Mandatory Preferred Stock.

Common Stock Issuances

Fiscal Year 2010

        During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, options to purchase 242,820 shares were exercised, resulting in proceeds of approximately $1.6 million.

        In June 2010, we sold 5,980,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten public offering that closed on June 28, 2010. The offering was priced at $48.50, and proceeds from the offering, net of commission and expenses, was approximately $276.2 million. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes and to fund acquisitions of additional royalty interests, including the acquisition of the gold stream on the Mt. Milligan Project as discussed in Note 18.

Fiscal Year 2009

        In April 2009, we sold 6,500,000 shares of our common stock in an underwritten public offering that closed on April 14, 2009. The offering was priced at $38.00 per share, and proceeds from the offering, net of commission and expenses, was approximately $235.0 million. The net proceeds from the offering were primarily used for general corporate purposes and to pay the cash component of the Andacollo Royalty acquisition, as discussed in Note 4.


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Exchangeable Shares

        In connection with the IRC Transaction discussed in Note 3, certain holders of IRC common stock received exchangeable shares of RG Exchangeco for each share of IRC common stock held. The exchangeable shares are convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, into shares of Royal Gold common stock on a one-for-one basis, and entitle holders to dividends and other rights economically equivalent to holders of Royal Gold common stock.

Treasury Stock

On January 25, 2008, the Company announced that its board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30.0 million of its common stock in the open market through March 31, 2008. The timing and number of shares repurchased through March 31, 2008, depended on market conditions and other corporate considerations. As of March 31, 2008, the Company repurchased 196,986 common shares, at an average price of $28.00 per common share, for a total cost of approximately $5.5 million. The common share repurchases were funded through cash and cash equivalents. The total cost to reacquire the 196,986 common shares was included inTreasury Stockon the Company’sCompany's consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2008. The repurchase program, pursuant to the January 25, 2008 announcement, ended on March 31, 2008.

On April 2, 2008, the Company retired the 196,986 common shares repurchased pursuant to the January 25, 2008 repurchase announcement. The 196,986 common shares retired have been returned to the Company’sCompany's authorized but unissued amount of common stock. Also, on June 20, 2008, the Company retired the remaining 229,224 common shares included in treasury stock. The 229,224 common shares

88


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
retired have been returned to the Company’sCompany's authorized but unissued amount of common stock. As of June 30, 2008,2010, the Company has zero96,675 common shares included in treasury stock.
Stockholders’stock which are carried at cost.

Stockholders' Rights Plan

On September 10, 2007, the Company amended and restated its Rights Agreement, dated September 10, 1997 (the “Existing Agreement”"Existing Agreement") pursuant to the First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated September 10, 2007 (the “Amended Agreement”"Amended Agreement"). The Amended Agreement extends the Final Expiration Date from September 10, 2007 to September 10, 2017. The Amended Agreement was approved by the Company’sCompany's board of directors (the “Board”"Board").

The Amended Agreement, like the Existing Agreement, is intended to deter coercive or abusive tender offers and market accumulations. The Amended Agreement is designed to encourage an acquirer to negotiate with the Board and to enhance the Board’sBoard's ability to act in the best interests of all the Company’s shareholders.

Company's stockholders.

Under the Amended Agreement, each shareholderstockholder of the Company holds one preferred stock purchase right (a “Right”"Right") for each share of Company common stock held. The Rights generally become exercisable only in the event that an acquiring party accumulates 15 percent or more of the Company’sCompany's outstanding shares of common stock. If this were to occur, subject to certain exceptions, each Right (except for the Rights held by the acquiring party) would allow its holders to purchase one one-thousandth of a newly issued share of Series A junior participating preferred stock of Royal Gold or the Company’sCompany's common stock with a value equal to twice the exercise price of the Right, initially set at $175 under the terms and conditions set forth in the Amended Agreement.


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.   EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS")

        Basic earnings per common share were computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share include the additional dilutive effect of our potentially dilutive securities, which include stock options, SARs, restricted stock and performance stock. The dilutive effects of our potentially dilutive securities are calculated using the treasury stock method.

Common Stock Issuances
 
 Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
 (in thousands, except share data)
 

Net income available to Royal Gold common stockholders

 $21,492 $38,348 $19,255 
        

Weighted-average shares for basic EPS

  43,640,414  35,337,133  31,054,725 

Effect of other dilutive securities

  340,403  451,943  335,568 
        

Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS

  43,980,817  35,789,076  31,390,293 
        

Basic earnings per share

 $0.49 $1.09 $0.62 
        

Diluted earnings per share

 $0.49 $1.07 $0.61 
        
Fiscal 2009
During

        For the fiscal yearyears ended June 30, 2010, 2009 options to purchase 50,190and 2008, 72,700, nil and 1,600 stock-based compensation awards were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as the result would be anti-dilutive.

        Our calculation of weighted average shares were exercised, resultingincludes all of our outstanding stock: common stock and exchangeable shares. Exchangeable shares are the equivalent of common shares in proceeds of approximately $0.8 million.

On April 14, 2009, we sold 6,500,000that they have the same dividend rights, share equitably in undistributed earnings and are exchangeable at anytime on a one-for-one basis for shares of our common stock at the holder's option. See Note 9 for a price of $38.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $235.0 million, which is netfurther discussion of the underwriter’s discountexchangeable shares.

11.   INCOME TAXES

        For financial reporting purposes, income before income taxes includes the following components:

 
 Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 

United States

 $55,623 $65,848 $38,284 

Foreign

  (12,037) (2,634) (289)
        

 $43,586 $63,214 $37,995 
        

Table of approximately $11.1 million and transaction costs of approximately $0.9 million. The net proceeds from the offering will be used primarily to pay the cash component of the Teck Transaction, as discussed within Note 2. If the Teck Transaction does not close, the net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes and to fund acquisitions of additional royalty interests.

89

Contents



ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On September 4, 2007, we issued 216,642 shares of our common stock to IAMGOLD Corporation (“IAMGOLD”) and Repadre International Corporation (“Repadre”) in connection with our acquisition from IAMGOLD and Repadre of all of their issued and outstanding shares of Battle Mountain common stock. We had the option to acquire the shares of Battle Mountain common stock from IAMGOLD and Repadre pursuant to an option and support agreement we entered into with IAMGOLD in connection with the merger with Battle Mountain.
Fiscal 2007
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, options to purchase 46,467 shares were exercised, resulting in proceeds of $0.6 million.
As discussed in Note 3, on January 24, 2007, we issued 577,434 shares of our common stock as part of the Peñasquito royalty acquisition.
In April 2007, we sold 4,400,064 shares of our common stock, at a price of $29.25 per share, resulting in proceeds of approximately $121.9 million, which is net of the underwriter’s discount of approximately $6.3 million and transaction costs of approximately $650,000. A portion of the net proceeds in this equity offering were used to pay a previously outstanding balance under our revolving credit facility with HSBC Bank, as discussed in Note 6, while the remaining net proceeds were used to fund the acquisition and financing of additional royalty interests and for general corporate purposes.
9. EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”) COMPUTATION
             
  For The Year Ended June 30, 2009 
  (In thousands, except share data) 
  Income  Shares  Per-Share 
  (Numerator)  (Denominator)  Amount 
Basic EPS            
Income available to common stockholders $38,348   35,337,133  $1.09 
Effect of other dilutive securities     451,943     
          
Diluted EPS $38,348   35,789,076  $1.07 
          
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, all outstanding stock-based compensation awards were included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price of the awards was less than the average market price of our common stock for the period.

90

(Continued)


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
             
  For The Year Ended June 30, 2008 
  (In thousands, except share data) 
  Income  Shares  Per-Share 
  (Numerator)  (Denominator)  Amount 
Net income $24,043         
 
Preferred stock dividends  (2,802)        
Preferred stock deemed dividend upon conversion  (1,986)        
            
Net income available to common stockholders for basic earnings per share $19,255   31,054,725  $0.62 
Effect of other dilutive securities     335,568     
          
 
Diluted EPS $19,255   31,390,293  $0.61 
          
Options to purchase 1,600 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of $32.40 per share, were outstanding at June 30, 2008, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period.
             
  For The Year Ended June 30, 2007 
  (In thousands, except share data) 
  Income  Shares  Per-Share 
  (Numerator)  (Denominator)  Amount 
Basic EPS            
Income available to common stockholders $19,720   24,827,319  $0.79 
Effect of dilutive securities      247,767     
          
Diluted EPS $19,720   25,075,086  $0.79 
          
Options to purchase 1,600 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of $32.40 per share, were outstanding at June 30, 2007, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period.
10. INCOME TAXES
The Company’sCompany'sIncome tax expenseconsisted of (in thousands):of:

             
  2009  2008  2007 
Current federal tax expense $24,027  $11,935  $10,310 
Deferred tax benefit  (2,953)  (32)  (813)
Increase in deferred tax asset valuation allowance  783   147   52 
          
Total income tax expense $21,857  $12,050  $9,549 
          
 
 Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 
 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 

Current:

          

Federal

 $20,299 $23,625 $11,726 

State

  219  402  210 

Foreign

  1,182     
        

 $21,700 $24,027 $11,936 
        

Deferred and others:

          

Federal

 $(1,304)$(2,396)$25 

State

  (114) 27   

Foreign

  (6,118) 199  89 
        

 $(7,536)$(2,170)$114 
        

Total income tax expense

 $14,164 $21,857 $12,050 
        

91


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The provision for income taxes for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable United States statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax income (net of minority interest in income of consolidated subsidiary and loss from equity investment) from operations as a result of the following differences (in thousands):differences:


 Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 
             2010 2009 2008 
 2009 2008 2007  (Amounts in thousands)
 
Total expense computed by applying federal rates $21,072 $12,633 $10,244  $15,255 $22,125 $13,298 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit 288 128 84 

State and Provincial income taxes, net of federal benefit

 189 288 128 
Adjustments of valuation allowance 783 147 52  (231) 783 147 
Excess depletion  (1,074)  (1,294)  (956) (1,642) (1,074) (1,294)

Acquisition related costs

 1,364   

Estimates for uncertain tax positions

 2,898   

Statutory tax attributable to Non-controlling interest

 (2,775) (1,053) (665)
Other 788 436 125  (894) 788 436 
              
 $21,857 $12,050 $9,549  $14,164 $21,857 $12,050 
              

Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards, which give rise to our deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, are as follows (in thousands):follows:

         2010 2009 
 2009 2008  (Amounts in thousands)
 
Deferred tax assets:  
Stock-based compensation $2,205 $1,595  $3,267 $2,205 
Net operating losses 7,261 1,451  28,009 7,261 
Other 349 381  3,828 349 
          
Total deferred tax assets 9,815 3,427  35,104 9,815 
 
Valuation allowance  (982)  (199) (2,280) (982)
          
Net deferred tax assets 8,833 3,228  32,824 8,833 
          
 
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Mineral property basis  (31,690)  (28,112) (180,323) (31,690)

Unrealized Foreign Exchange Gains

 (3,384)  
Other  (397)  (1,100) (1,568) (397)
          
Total deferred tax liabilities  (32,087)  (29,212) (185,275) (32,087)
          
 
Total net deferred taxes $(23,254) $(25,984) $(152,451)$(23,254)
          

        The Company reviews the measurement of its deferred tax assets at each balance sheet date. All available evidence, both positive and negative, is considered in determining whether, based upon the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. As of June 30, 2010 and 2009, ourthe Company had $2.3 million and $1.0 million of valuation allowances recorded, respectively. The valuation allowance increased $1.5 million during the year as a result of the acquisition of IRC tax attributes, which did not have an effect on the overall tax rate. The increase was associated with foreignoffset by the reversal of $0.2 million of the valuation allowance previously recorded that did have an effect on the tax rate. The valuation allowance remaining at June 30, 2010 primarily is attributable to non-U.S. subsidiaries tax loss carry forwards.

        At June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $110 million and $27 million of net operating loss carryforwards attributed to RGCL and one of our Canadian wholly-owned subsidiaries, RGLD Gold Canada, Inc. (“RGLD Gold”). As of June 30, 2008, our valuation allowance was associated with foreign net operating loss carryforwards attributed to RGCL. As of June 30, 2009,carry forwards, respectively. The increase in the net operating loss associated with RGCLcarry forwards is attributable to (i) non-U.S. subsidiaries accounting losses of $23 million incurred during the year, (ii) non-U.S. subsidiaries accelerated tax deductions of $30 million for the year which have an offsetting deferred tax liability recorded, and RGLD Gold is approximately $1.3(iii) an increase of $30 million and $22.9 million, respectively. There isfor losses of IRC entities acquired that did not have an unlimited carryback and carryforward periodeffect on the overall tax rate. The majority of the tax loss carry forwards are in jurisdictions that allow a twenty year carry forward period. As a result, these losses do not begin to use such losses.

expire until the 2025 tax year.

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48ASC 740 for accounting for uncertain income tax positions on July 1, 2007, with no impact on its financial statements. As of June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $11.9 million and 2008, the Company’s$0.6 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, were $0.6 millionrespectively. The increase in gross unrecognized tax benefits was primarily related to tax positions of IRC entities taken prior to or upon the acquisition by the Company. If recognized, these unrecognized tax benefits would


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


impact the Company's effective income tax rate. A reconciliation of the beginning and $0.4 million, respectively, for uncertain tax positions. The liability forending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is reflected withinOther long-term liabilitieson the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.as follows:

 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 

Total gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year

 $614 $410 $ 

Additions / Reductions for tax positions of prior years

  144  28    

Additions / Reductions for tax positions of current year

  11,116  176  410 

Reductions due to settlements with taxing authorities

       

Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations

       
        

Total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of year

 $11,874 $614 $410 
        

The materialCompany or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns the Company files arein the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state and local, and non-U.S. income tax return, which hasexaminations by tax authorities for fiscal years before 2007. As a three yearresult of (i) statute of limitations that will begin to expire within the next 12 months in various jurisdictions, and (ii) possible settlements of audit-related issues with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions with respect to which none of the Colorado stateissues are individually significant, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its net unrecognized income tax return, which has a four year statutebenefits will decrease between $0 and $0.5 million in the next 12 months.

        The Company's continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of limitations. The U.S. federal return forits income tax years ended on or afterexpense. At June 30, 2006,2010 and 2009, the Colorado state

92


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
return for tax years ended on or after June 30, 2005, are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority.
Interestamount of accrued income-tax-related interest and penalties associated withwas $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively. This amount is included in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is approximately $0.1 million at June 30, 2009, and is includedreflected inOther long-term liabilitieson the Company’sCompany's consolidated balance sheets.
11.

12.   SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The Company’sCompany's supplemental cash flow information for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 is as follows (in thousands):follows:

             
  2009 2008 2007
Cash paid during the period for:            
Interest $391  $720  $801 
Income taxes, net of refunds $23,303  $13,292  $10,293 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:            
Dividends declared $11,117  $11,571  $6,289 
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock $  $116,946  $ 
Battle Mountain acquisition (with common stock) $  $35,832  $ 
Acquisition of royalty interest in mineral property (with common stock) $  $  $18,495 
 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 

Cash paid during the period for:

          
 

Interest

 $1,815 $391 $720 
 

Income taxes, net of refunds

 $16,630 $23,303 $13,292 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

          
 

Dividends declared

 $16,339 $11,117 $11,571 
 

Acquisition of IRC (with common stock and exchangeable shares)

 $308,882 $ $ 
 

Acquisition of royalty interests in mineral properties (with common stock)

 $53,428 $ $35,832 
 

In-kind distribution to CVP partners

 $6,125 $ $ 
 

Treasury stock

 $(3,557)$ $ 
 

Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

 $ $ $116,946 

Table of Contents

12.
ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13.   FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described below:

      Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

      Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

      Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques requiring inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

        The following table sets forth the Company's financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy.

 
 Fair Value at June 30, 2010 
 
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
 
 (In thousands)
 

Assets:

             
 

Money market investments(1)

 $284 $284 $ $ 
 

Marketable equity securities(2)

  185  185     
          

 $469 $469 $ $ 
          

(1)
Included inCash and equivalents in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

(2)
Included inOther assets in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

        The carrying amount of our long-term debt (including the current portion) approximates fair value as of June 30, 2010.

        The Company invests in money market funds, which are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. The Company's money market funds, which are invested in United States treasury bills or United States treasury backed securities, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

        As of June 30, 2010, the Company also had assets that, under certain conditions, are subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis like those associated with royalty interests in mineral properties, intangible assets and other long-lived assets. For these assets, measurement at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition are applicable if any of these assets are determined to be impaired; however, no triggering events have occurred relative to any of these assets during the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. If recognition of these assets at their fair value becomes necessary, such measurements will be determined utilizing Level 3 inputs.


Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

14.   MAJOR SOURCES OF REVENUE

In each of fiscal years 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, we recognized approximately $30.6 million, $22.2 million $27.7 million and $28.2$27.7 million, respectively, of our total royalty revenue from the same operator, Barrick, but not from the same mine.

13. SIMPLIFIED EMPLOYEE PENSION (“SEP”) PLAN
We maintain

15.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Voisey's Bay

        On February 22, 2010, as part of the IRC Transaction discussed in Note 3, we acquired a Simplified Employee Pension Plan (“SEP Plan”royalty on the Voisey's Bay Mine in Newfoundland and Labrador owned by Vale Newfoundland & Labrador Limited ("VNL"). The royalty is owned by the LNRLP, in which all employeesthe Company's wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, Canadian Minerals Partnership, is the general partner and 89.99% owner. The remaining interests in LNRLP are eligibleowned by Altius (10%), a company unrelated to participate. We contribute a minimum of 3% of an employee’s compensation to an account set up for the benefit of the employee. If an employee chooses to make additional contributions to the SEP Plan through salary withholdings, we will match such contributions to a maximum of 7% of the employee’s salary. We contributed $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Casmalia
On March 24, 2000, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) notified Royal Gold and 92 other entities that they were considered potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”IRC, and the Company's wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, Voisey's Bay Holding Corporation (0.01%).

        On October 16, 2009, LNRLP filed a claim in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador Trial Division against Vale Inco Limited ("Vale Inco") underand its wholly owned subsidiaries, Vale Inco Atlantic Sales Limited ("VIASL") and VNL, related to calculation of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“Superfund”), at the Casmalia Resources Hazardous Waste Disposal Site (the “Site”) in Santa Barbara County, California. EPA’s allegation that Royal Gold was a PRP was basedNSR on the disposalsale of allegedly

93


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
hazardous petroleum exploration wastes atconcentrates, including nickel concentrates, from the Site by Royal Gold’s predecessor, Royal Resources, Inc., during 1983Voisey's Bay Mine to Vale Inco. The claim asserts that Vale Inco is incorrectly calculating the NSR. The claim asserts that Vale Inco is incorrectly calculating the NSR and 1984.
After extensive negotiations, on September 23, 2002, Royal Gold, along with 35 membersrequests an order in respect of the PRP group targeted by EPA, entered into a Partial Consent Decree with EPA andcorrect calculation of future payments. The claim also requests specific damages for underpayment of past royalties to the United States Department of Justice intending to settle their liability for past and future clean-up costs incurred or expected to be incurred at the Site by the federal government. The United States District Court for the Central District of California entered the Partial Consent Decree on August 14, 2003. Based on the minimal volume of allegedly hazardous substances that Royal Resources, Inc. disposed of at the Site, which was characterized in volume as de minimis, our sharedate of the $25.3claim in an amount not less than $29 million, settlement amounttogether with additional damages until the date of trial, interest, costs and other damages. The litigation is in the discovery phase and was approximately $0.1 million, which we deposited into the escrow account that the PRP group set up for that purpose in January 2002. The funds were paid to the United States Treasury on May 9, 2003 and the Partial Consent Decree was executed. As a resultnot valued as part of the settlement,purchase price allocation discussed in Note 3 as the United States of America may only pursue Royal Gold and the other PRPs for additional clean-up costs if the United States’ total clean-up costs at the Site significantly exceed the expected cost of approximately $272 million.
Royal Gold also executed a de minimis party Administrative Order on Consent (“AOC”) with the State of California on January 15, 2009. The AOC will become effective after notice from the California Attorney General that the required 30-day public comment period has closed and that comments received, if any, do not require modifications to or withdrawal of the AOC by the State of California. It is not anticipated at this date that any such modifications or withdrawals will occur.
Under the terms of the federal Partial Consent Decree and the state AOC, we believe our potential liability with the United States of America, the State of California, and third parties tooutcome cannot be effectively settled and any further exposure related to the Casmalia site to be a remote possibility.
reasonably estimated.

Holt

On October 1, 2008, as part of the Company’sCompany's acquisition of a portfolio of royalties from Barrick, , we acquired a royalty on athe Holt portion of the development stage Holloway-Holt mining project in Ontario, Canada, owned by St Andrew.Andrew Goldfields Ltd. ("St Andrew"). St Andrew succeeded Newmont Canada Corporation (“("Newmont Canada”Canada") as owner of the Holloway-Holt mining project in November 2006. By virtue of the Company’sCompany's acquisition of Barrick’sBarrick's royalty portfolio, RGLD Gold Canada, Inc. ("RGLD Gold") succeeded Barrick as the royalty payee under the royalty agreement.

On or about November 3, 2008, St Andrew filed an action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”"Court") seeking, among other things, declarations by the Court that St Andrew’sAndrew's obligation in respect of the royalty is limited to only a portion of the total royalty payable, and that any additional royalty obligations under the royalty agreement remain the responsibility of Newmont Canada. Newmont Canada responded that St Andrew is responsible for all royalty obligations under the royalty agreement.

Barrick

        Royal Gold and RoyalRGLD Gold (collectively "Royal Gold") and Barrick were joined as necessary parties to the litigation in January 2009. Trial concerning calculation of the royalty and the party or parties responsible for paying it was held from January 30, 2009 to February 12, 2009. On July 23, 2009, the Court held that Royal Gold is entitled to payment from Newmont Canada of the full amount of the sliding-scale NSR royalty on gold produced from the Holt mine. The Court also held that St Andrew’sAndrew's sole obligation is to reimburse Newmont Canada for payment of the royalty up to a flat rate of 0.013% of the net smelter returns for gold, silver and other metals. The Court’sOn August 21, 2009, Newmont Canada appealed the Court's decision may be appealed within 30 daysto the Court of Appeal of Ontario and on December 9, 2009, made Royal Gold a party to the dateappeal.


Table of decision.

Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Holt royalty is currently classified as a development stage royalty interest and the Company does not currently receive revenue from the royalty.

94


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Contractual Obligations
Our long-term contractual obligations as of June 30, 2009, are as follows:
                     
  Payments Due by Period (in thousands) 
      Less than          More than 
Contractual Obligations Total  1 Year  1-3 Years  3-5 Years  5 Years 
Note payable(1)
 $19,546  $108  $19,438  $  $ 
Operating leases  718   193   525       
Other long-term obligations  89   26   53   10    
                
Total $20,353  $327  $20,016  $10  $ 
                
(1)Amounts represent principal ($19.25 million) and estimated interest payments ($0.3 million) assuming no early extinguishment. See Note 5 for further detail.
(2)We lease office space under a lease agreement, which expires October 31, 2012.
Employment Agreements
We have one-year employment agreements with some of our officers which, under certain circumstances, require total minimum future base compensation, at June 30, 2009, of approximately $1.1 million. The terms of each of these agreements automatically extend for four successive one-year periods, unless terminated by Royal Gold or the officer, according to the terms of the agreements.
15.16.   RELATED PARTY
Crescent Valley Partners, L.P. (“CVP”)

        CVP was formed as a limited partnership in April 1992. It owns a 1.25% net value royalty (“NVR1”("NVR1") on production of minerals from a portion of Cortez. Denver Mining Finance Company (“DMFC”("DMFC"), our wholly-owned subsidiary, is the general partner and holds a 2.0% interest in CVP. In addition, Royal Gold holds a 29.6% limited partner interest in the partnership, while our Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of our Audit Committee and one other member of our board of directors hold an aggregate 35.56% limited partner interest. The general partner performs administrative services for CVP in receiving and processing the royalty payments from the operator, including the disbursement of royalty payments and record keeping for in-kind distributions to the limited partners, including ourwhich includes certain directors and our Chairman.

Effective with the Barrick royalty portfolio acquisition (see Note 2), CVP assigned to Barrick the portion of CVP’s royalty interests in the undeveloped Crossroads deposit at Cortez attributable to Royal Gold through its limited partnership interest in CVP and general partnership interest through DMFC. The portion transferred equaled a 0.3954% royalty interest. CVP’s royalty interest outside the undeveloped Crossroads deposit was unaffected by the Barrick transaction.

CVP receives its royalty from the Cortez Joint Venture in-kind. The Company, as well as certain other limited partners, sell their pro-rata shares of such gold immediately and receive distributions in cash, while CVP holds gold for certain other limited partners. Such gold inventories, which totaled 24,97718,067 and 27,55224,977 ounces of gold as of June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively, are held by a third party refinery in Utah for the account of the limited partners of CVP. The inventories are carried at historical cost and are classified aswithinInventory — restrictedOther assets on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The carrying value of the gold in inventory was approximately $10.6$8.7 million and $11.2$10.6 million as of June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively, while the fair value of such ounces was approximately $23.3$22.5 million and $25.6$23.3 million as of

95


ROYAL GOLD, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively. None of the gold currently held in inventory as of June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, is attributed to Royal Gold’s CVP partnership interest,Gold, as the gold allocated to Royal Gold’sGold's CVP partnership interest is typically sold within five days of receipt.
16.

17.   QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

        The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial information (unaudited):

                     
              Basic  Diluted 
  Royalty  Operating  Net  Earnings  Earnings 
  Revenues  Income  Income  Per Share  Per Share 
Fiscal Year 2009 Quarter Ended (in thousands):
                    
                     
September 30 $16,079  $8,464  $5,749  $0.17  $0.17 
December 31  14,622   2,387   21,397   0.63   0.62 
March 31  20,797   7,139   4,142   0.12   0.12 
June 30  22,273   9,302   7,060   0.18   0.16 
                
  $73,771  $27,292  $38,348  $1.09  $1.07 
                
                     
Fiscal Year 2008 Quarter Ended (in thousands):
                    
                     
September 30 $12,503  $7,066  $5,538  $0.19  $0.19 
December 31  14,710   6,389   4,610   0.11   0.11 
March 31  18,731   9,001   6,889   0.11   0.11 
June 30  20,353   10,526   7,006   0.21   0.20 
                
  $66,297  $32,982  $24,043  $0.62  $0.61 
                
 
 Royalty
revenues
 Operating
income
(loss)
 Net income
(loss) available
to Royal Gold
Common
Stockholders
 Basic
earnings
per share
 Diluted
earnings
per share
 
 
 (Amounts in thousands except per share data)
 

Fiscal year 2010 quarter-ended:

                
 

September 30

 $26,113 $10,754 $7,126 $0.18 $0.17 
 

December 31

  34,740  15,201  9,615  0.24  0.23 
 

March 31

  35,043  (1,231) (5,754) (0.13) (0.13)
 

June 30

  40,669  16,311  10,505  0.21  0.21 
            

 $136,565 $41,035 $21,492 $0.49 $0.49 
            

Fiscal year 2009 quarter-ended:

                
 

September 30

 $16,079 $8,464 $5,749 $0.17 $0.17 
 

December 31

  14,622  2,387  21,397  0.63  0.62 
 

March 31

  20,797  7,139  4,142  0.12  0.12 
 

June 30

  22,273  9,302  7,060  0.18  0.16 
            

 $73,771 $27,292 $38,348 $1.09 $1.07 
            

Table of Contents


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

18.   SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Proposed Acquisition of Gold Stream on the Mt. Milligan Project

        On July 15, 2010, Royal Gold entered into a letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement") pursuant to which it agreed to acquire 25% of the payable gold produced from the Mt. Milligan copper-gold project in British Columbia from Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. or its affiliate ("Thompson Creek") concurrent with the closing of Thompson Creek's proposed acquisition (the "Acquisition") of Terrane Metals Corp. ("Terrane"). The terms and conditions under which Royal Gold will acquire the payable gold are contained in a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Purchase and Sale Agreement") among Royal Gold, Thompson Creek and a subsidiary of each entity to be identified prior to the closing of the Acquisition. The obligation of Royal Gold and Thompson Creek to enter into the Purchase and Sale Agreement is subject to certain customary conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement. Under the Letter Agreement, Thompson Creek and Royal Gold have each agreed to an exclusivity arrangement with the other party in respect to certain alternative gold-related financing transactions in connection with the Mt. Milligan project until the closing of the Acquisition or earlier termination of the Letter Agreement in accordance with its terms. The Letter Agreement also contains representations and warranties and covenants in respect of Royal Gold and Thompson Creek.

        The Acquisition has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both Thompson Creek and Terrane. Goldcorp, which owns 52% of Terrane's fully diluted shares (including preference shares), has agreed to convert its preference shares into common shares and vote in favor of the Acquisition. Completion of the Acquisition is subject to, among other things, the favorable vote of 662/3 of the Terrane equity shareholders at a special meeting called to approve the Acquisition, which is expected to occur in September 2010.

Acquisition of Additional Royalty Interests at Pascua-Lama

        On July 1, 2010, the Company entered into two separate assignment of rights agreements with two private Chilean citizens whereby Royal Gold acquired the right to acquire an additional 0.75% NSR sliding-scale royalty on the Pascua-Lama project, which is owned and operated by Barrick and located on the border between Argentina and Chile, for a purchase price of $53 million. Of this amount, $25 million has been paid to immediately acquire an additional 0.35% royalty interest. A deferred payment of $28 million is expected to be made on or before October 29, 2010, to acquire the remaining 0.40% royalty interest. In addition, on April 23, 2010, Royal Gold entered into an immaterial assignment of rights agreement with another private Chilean citizen whereby Royal Gold acquired an additional 0.25% NSR on the project for a purchase price of $15 million. Once the deferred closings occur, Royal Gold's total gold royalty interest in the Pascua-Lama project will increase to 5.23% NSR, at gold prices above $800 per ounce. Pursuant to the assignment of rights agreements, Royal Gold also acquired a 0.20% fixed-rate copper royalty that takes effect after January 1, 2017, increasing Royal Gold's copper royalty interest in the Pascua-Lama project to 1.05%.


96


Table of Contents

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

        None.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, there were no changes in or disagreements with our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, over accounting and financial disclosure.
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2009,2010, the Company’sCompany's management, with the participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’sCompany's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”"Exchange Act")). Based on such evaluation, the Company’sCompany's President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer have concluded that, as of June 30, 2009,2010, the Company���sCompany's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that such information is accumulated and communicated byto the Company’sCompany's management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Disclosure controls and procedures involve human diligence and compliance and are subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. As a result, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Management’s

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009.2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework. Based on ourmanagement's assessment and those criteria, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2009,2010, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

Our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no

97


evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.


Table of Contents

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’sCompany's independent registered public accounting firm, audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009,2010, as stated in their report, which is included herein.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers’ report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is contained within Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated by reference herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during our fourth fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009,2010, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION

        None.


ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item appears under the section headings “Proposal 1 - Election of Class I Directors”, “Directors and Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”is included in the Company’sCompany's Proxy Statement for its 20092010 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company’sCompany's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics within the meaning of Item 406 of Regulation S-K adopted by the SEC under the Exchange Act that applies to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer is available on the Company’sCompany's website at www.royalgold.com and in print without changecharge to any stockholder who requests a copy. Requests for copies should be directed to Royal Gold, Inc., Attention Karen Gross, 1660 Wynkoop Street, Suite 1000, Denver, Colorado, 80202. The Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of the Company’sCompany's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on the Company’sCompany's website.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item appears under the section heading “Executive Compensation”is included in the Company’sCompany's Proxy Statement for its 20092010 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

98


ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item appears under the sub-section heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and section heading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”is included in the Company’sCompany's Proxy Statement for its 20092010 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item appears under the sub-section heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Independence of Directors”is included in the Company’sCompany's Proxy Statement for its 20092010 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item appears under the sub-section heading “Independent Registered Public Accountants” and the section heading “Proposal 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accountants”is included in the Company’sCompany's Proxy Statement for its 20092010 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after June 30, 2009,2010, and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)Financial Statements

The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the report thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated August 20, 2009,26, 2010, are included as part of Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, commencing on page 6563 above.


Index to Financial Statements


Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  6564 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  6665 

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

  6766 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’Changes in Equity

  6867 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  6968 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  7069 
(b)Exhibits

(b)   Exhibits

Reference is made to the Exhibit Index beginning on page 101100 hereof.


99


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amended report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


 


ROYAL GOLD, INC.

Date: August 26, 2010

 
Date: August 21, 2009 
By:
By:
 

/s/ TONY JENSEN

Tony Jensen
Tony Jensen 

President, and Chief Executive Officer
and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this amended report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Date: August 21, 2009 26, 2010
By:
 

By:


/s/ TONY JENSEN

Tony Jensen
Tony Jensen 

President, and Chief Executive Officer
and Director

Date: August 21, 2009 26, 2010
By:
 

By:


/s/ StefanSTEFAN L. Wenger
WENGER

Stefan Wenger

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: August 26, 2010


By:


/s/ STANLEY DEMPSEY

Stanley Dempsey
Chairman

Date: August 26, 2010

 

By:


/s/ M. CRAIG HAASE

M. Craig Haase
Director

Date: August 21, 2009 26, 2010
By:
 

By:


/s/ Stanley DempseyWILLIAM M. HAYES

William M. Hayes
Director
Stanley Dempsey 
Chairman 

Date: August 21, 2009 26, 2010
By:
 

By:


/s/ S. ODEN HOWELL, JR.

S. Oden Howell, Jr.
Director
S. Oden Howell, Jr. 
Director 

Date: August 21, 2009 26, 2010
By:
 

By:


/s/ JohnJAMES W. Goth
John W. Goth 
Director 
Date: August 21, 2009 By:  /s/ Merritt E. Marcus
Merritt E. Marcus 
Director 
Date: August 21, 2009 By:  /s/ M. Craig Haase
M. Craig Haase 
Director 
Date: August 21, 2009 By:  /s/ STUCKERT

James W. Stuckert
Director
James W. Stuckert 
Director 

Date: August 21, 2009 26, 2010
By:
 

By:


/s/ DONALD J. WORTH

Donald J. Worth
Director
Donald J. Worth 
Director 
Date: August 21, 2009 By:  /s/ William M. Hayes
William M. Hayes 
Director 

100


Table of Contents


Exhibit Index

Exhibit

Number
Description
 2.1 Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 30, 2007, among Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corp., Royal Gold, Inc. and Royal Battle Mountain, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on August 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

2.2

 

Amended and Restated Arrangement Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, among Royal Gold, Inc., RG Exchangeco Inc. (formerly, 7296355 Canada Ltd.) and International Royalty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report of Form 8-K on January 22, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

3.1

 

Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on February 8, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

3.2

 
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 1, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

3.3

 
3.3
Amended and Restated Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on September 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

3.4

 

Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Special Voting Preferred Stock of Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on February 23, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

4.1

 

First Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated September 10, 2007 between Royal Gold, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’sCompany's Registration Statement on Form 8-A on September 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

4.2

 
4.2
Stockholder Agreement dated April 3, 2009 by and among Royal Gold, Inc., Compañía Minera Carmen de Andacollo and Teck Cominco Limited (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

4.3

 

Amendment No. 1 to the Stockholder Agreement, dated January 12, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on January 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)

 
10.1*
4.4


Appendix I to Schedule B of the Amended and Restated Arrangement Agreement, dated January 15, 2010, among Royal Gold, Inc., RG Exchangeco Inc. (formerly, 7296355 Canada Ltd.) and International Royalty Corporation (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on January 22, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.1

**

Equity Incentive Plan (filed as part of the Company’sCompany's proxy statement for its 1996 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on November 25, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.2

 
10.2
Exploration and Development Option Agreement between Placer Dome United States, Inc. and Royal Gold, Inc. dated effective July 1, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10(v) to the Company’sCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K on September 28, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.3

 
10.3
Royalty Agreement between Royal Gold, Inc. and the Cortez Joint Venture dated April 1, 1999 (filed as part of Item 5 of the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on April 12, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
 10.4 Firm offer to purchase royalty interest of “Idaho Group”"Idaho Group" between Royal Gold, Inc. and Idaho Group dated July 22, 1999 (filed as Attachment A to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on September 2, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.5
10.5*
**

Amendment to Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Appendix A to the Company’sCompany's proxy statement on October 15, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference)

101


Exhibit

10.6

 
NumberDescription
10.6
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated December 6, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on December 23, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.7

 
10.7
Production Payment Agreement between Genesis Inc. and Royal Gold, Inc. dated October 13, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.1(a) to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on October 18, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.8

 
10.8
Royalty Deed between Genesis Inc. and Royal Gold, Inc. dated October 13, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.1(b) to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on October 18, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.9

 
10.9
Agreement between Genesis Inc. and Royal Gold, Inc. dated October 13, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.1(c) to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on October 18, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.10

 
10.10
Royalty Assignment and Agreement, effective as of December 26, 2002, between High Desert Mineral Resources, Inc. and High Desert Gold Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.11

 
10.11
Royalty Assignment, Confirmation, Amendment, and Restatement of Royalty, and Agreement, dated as of November 30, 1995, among Barrick Bullfrog Inc., Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc. and Royal Hal Co. (filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.12

 
10.12
Amendment to Royalty Assignment, Confirmation, Amendment, and Restatement of Royalty, and Agreement, effective as of October 1, 2004, among Barrick Bullfrog Inc., Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc. and Royal Hal Co. (filed as Exhibit 99.6 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.13

 
10.13
Proceeds Agreement with HSBC Bank USA (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on December 20, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.14

 
10.14
Purchase Agreement, between Kennecott Minerals Company and Royal Gold, Inc., dated December 22, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on December 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.15

 
10.15
Amended and Restated Funding Agreement dated as of February 22, 2006, between Société des Mines de Taparko, also known as Somita, SA, and Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on March 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.16

 
10.16
Conveyance of Tail Royalty and Grant of Milling Fee dated as of February 22, 2006, between Société des Mines de Taparko, also known as Somita, SA, and Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on March 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

102Table of Contents


Exhibit

Number
Description
 10.17 Conveyance of Production Payment dated as of February 22, 2006, between Société des Mines de Taparko, also known as Somita, SA, and Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on March 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.18

 
10.18
Guaranty and Agreement in Support of Somita Funding Agreement dated as of February 22, 2006, from High River Gold Mine Ltd. to and for the benefit of Royal Gold Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 9, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.19

 
10.19
Pledge Agreement dated as of February 22, 2006, between High River Gold Mines (International) Ltd., High River Gold Mines (West Africa) Ltd. and Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 9, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.20

 
10.20
Guarantee Agreement dated as of February 22, 2006, by High River Gold Mines Ltd. in favor of Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 9, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.21

 
10.21
Pledge of Securities dated as of February 22, 2006, by High River Gold Mines Ltd. in favor of Royal Gold, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 9, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.22

 
10.22
Contribution Agreement in Support of Somita Funding Agreement dated as of February 22, 2006, from High River Gold Mine Ltd. to and for the benefit of Royal Gold Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 9, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.23
10.23*
**

Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement with Directors and Officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K on November 13, 2006, together with the Schedule of Certain Officers Parties thereto (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on September 4, 2007),February 22, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.24

 
10.24
Purchase and Sale Agreement for Peñasquito and Other Royalties among Minera Kennecott S.A. DE C.V., Kennecott Exploration Company and Royal Gold, Inc., dated December 28, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.25

 
10.25
Shares for Debt Agreement between Kennecott Exploration Company and Royal Gold, Inc., dated December 28, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.26

 
10.26
Contract for Assignment of Rights Granted, by Minera Kennecott, S.A. de C.V. Represented in this Agreement by Mr. Dave F. Simpson, and Minera Peñasquito, S.A. de C.V., Represented in this Agreement by Attorney, Jose Maria Gallardo Tamayo (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

103


Exhibit

10.27

 
NumberDescription
10.27
Supplemental Mortgage, Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Pledge and Financing Statement between High Desert Mineral Resources, Inc. and HSBC USA Bank, National Association, dated January 5, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
 10.28 Amended and Restated Mortgage, Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Pledge and Financing Statement between Royal Gold and HSBC USA Bank, National Association, dated January 5, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.29

 
10.29
Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note between Royal Gold, High Desert Mineral Resources, Inc. and HSBC USA Bank, National Association, dated January 5, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.30

 
10.30
Assignment of Rights Agreement among Mario Ivan Hernández Alvarez, Royal Gold Chile Limitada and Royal Gold Inc., dated January 16, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’sCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on February 9, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.31

 
10.31Guaranty between Royal Gold, Inc. and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, dated as of March 1, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 4, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.32
Royalty Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 30, 2008 by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Barrick Gold Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.44 to Royal Gold’sGold's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed on November 6, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.32
10.33Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement dated as of August 27, 2008 between Royal Gold Chile Limitada and HSBC Bank USA, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 2, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.34*
**

Employment Agreement by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Tony Jensen dated September 15, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’sGold's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 19, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.33
10.35*
**

Form of Employment Agreement by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and each of the following: Stanley Dempsey, Karen Gross, Stefan Wenger and Bruce Kirchhoff (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’sGold's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 19, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.34
10.36*
**

Form of Award Modification Agreement by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and each of the following: Stanley Dempsey, Tony Jensen, Karen Gross and Bruce Kirchhoff (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Royal Gold’sGold's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 19, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.35
10.37

Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 31, 2008 by and among Royal Gold, Inc., High Desert Mineral Resources, Inc., RG Mexico, Inc., HSBC Bank USA, National Association, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. and Bank of Nova Scotia (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’sGold's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 6, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)

104


Exhibit

10.36
NumberDescription
10.38*
**

2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’sGold's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 6, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.37
10.39*
**

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under Royal Gold’sGold's 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Royal Gold’sGold's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.38

**

Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement under Royal Gold's 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Royal Gold's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.39

**

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under Royal Gold's 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Royal Gold's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.40**Form of Performance Share Agreement under Royal Gold's 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Royal Gold's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.41
10.40*
**

Form of Non-qualified Stock OptionAppreciation Rights Agreement under Royal Gold’sGold's 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.310.6 to Royal Gold’sGold's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

10.42

 
10.41**Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008
Amended and incorporated herein by reference)
10.42**Form of Performance Share Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.43**Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under Royal Gold’s 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Royal Gold’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.44**Form of Indemnification Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.01 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on November 13, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference) entered into by Royal Gold, Inc. and William Zisch on March 26, 2009.
10.45Restated Master Agreement dated April 3, 2009, by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Compañía Minera Teck Carmen de Andacollo, dated as of January 12, 2010, along with the related Form of Royalty Agreement attached thereto as Exhibit C (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Royal Gold’sthe Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on January 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.43


Amended and Restated Term Loan Facility Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2010, among Royal Gold, Inc., as a Borrower, Royal Gold Chile Limitada, as a Guarantor, RGLD Gold Canada, Inc., as a Guarantor, High Desert Mineral Resources, Inc., as a Guarantor, the other Guarantors from time to time party thereto, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrative Agent and a Lender, Bank of Nova Scotia, as Sole Syndication Agent and a Lender and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., as Sole Lead Arranger (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on April 1, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.44


Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated March 26, 2010, by Royal Gold, Inc. to HSBC Bank USA, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on April 1, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.45


Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated March 26, 2010, by Royal Gold, Inc. to The Bank of Nova Scotia (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on April 1, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.46

*

Release Agreement among Royal Gold, Inc., RGLD Gold Canada, Inc. and HSBC Bank USA, National Association dated July 19, 2010


10.47

*

Commercial Pledge on Equity Interests in Royal Gold Chile Limitada by Royal Gold, Inc. et al. to HSBC Bank USA, National Association dated May 7, 2010 (English Translation)


10.48

*

Irrevocable Commercial Commission among Royal Gold, Inc. et al. and HSBC Bank USA, National Association dated May 7, 2010 (English Translation)


10.49

*

Agreement on Surety and Joint and Several Co-Debt established by Royal Gold Chile Limitada in favor of HSBC Bank USA, National Association dated May 7, 2010 (English Translation)


10.50

*

Commercial Pledge on Rights by Royal Gold Chile Limitada to HSBC Bank USA, National Association dated May 7, 2010 (relating to Andacollo royalty) (English Translation)


10.51

*

Commercial Pledge on Rights by Royal Gold Chile Limitada to HSBC Bank USA, National Association dated May 28, 2010 (relating to Pascua Lama royalty) (English Translation)


10.52

*

Commercial Pledge on Rights by Royal Gold Chile Limitada to HSBC Bank USA, National Association dated May 28, 2010 (relating to El Toqui royalty) (English Translation)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.53Consent and First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 26, 2010, among Royal Gold, Inc., as a Borrower, High Desert Mineral Resources, Inc., as a Borrower, RG Mexico,  Inc., as a Guarantor, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Administrative Agent and a Lender, Scotiabanc Inc., as a Lender, Bank of Nova Scotia, as Sole Syndication Agent and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., as Sole Lead Arranger (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on April 1, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.54


Support Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2010, among Royal Gold, Inc., RG Callco Inc., and RG Exchangeco Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on February 23, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.55


Voting and Exchange Trust Agreement, dated as of February 22, 2010, among Royal Gold, Inc., RG Exchangeco Inc. and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on February 23, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.56


Labrador Option Agreement, dated May 18, 1993, between Diamond Fields Resources Inc. and Archean Resources Ltd., as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on May 7, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.57


Form of Assignment of Rights Agreement between Royal Gold, Inc. and certain individuals dated July 1, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on July 8, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.58


Letter Agreement between Royal Gold, Inc. and Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. dated July 15, 2010, (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on July 21, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). (Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted by redacting a portion of the text (indicated by asterisks in the text) in reliance on Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The omitted confidential portions have been submitted separately to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission). The form of Purchase and Sale Agreement attached thereto has been superseded by the form of Purchase and Sale Agreement included in Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2010.


10.59


Letter Agreement between Royal Gold, Inc. and Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. dated August 16, 2010, which includes the form of Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among Royal Gold, Inc., Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. and a subsidiary of each entity to be identified prior to the closing of the Acquisition (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on August 20, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference) (Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted by redacting a portion of the text (indicated by asterisks in the text) in reliance on Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The omitted confidential portions have been submitted separately to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission).


10.60

*

Robinson Property Trust Ancillary Agreement by and between Kennecott Holdings Corporation, Kennecott Rawhide Mining Company and Kennecott Nevada Copper Company and BHP Nevada Mining Company, dated September 12, 2003


10.61

*

Shares Purchase and Sale Agreement by Jaime Ugarte Lee and others to Compañia Minera Barrick Chile Limitada, dated as of March 23, 2001 (English Translation)


10.62

*

Letter Agreement between Minefinders Corporation Ltd., Francis J.L. Guardia and John W. Perston, dated January 27, 1993

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.63*Mining Rights Purchase Agreement by and between Mr. Liébano Sáenz Ortiz and Compañía Minera Dolores, S.A. de C.V. dated October 13, 2006 (English Translation)


10.64

*

Royalty Deed between St Barbara Mines Limited and Resource Capital Funds III L.P., dated March 29, 2005, as supplemented and amended by the Supplemental Deed between St Barbara Mines Limited and Resource Capital Funds III L.P., dated May 20, 2005


10.65

*

Net Smelter Return Royalty Agreement by and between Newmont Canada Limited and Barrick Gold Corporation, dated October 8, 2004


10.66


Royalty for Technical Expertise Agreement by and between Tenedoramex S. A. de C. V. and Kennecott Minerals Company, dated as of March 23, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on January 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)


10.67


Siguiri Gold Project, Guinea, WestAfrica, Option Agreement by and between N.V. Union Miniere S.A. and Golden Shamrock Mines Limited, dated December 23, 1992 (filed as Exhibit 99.6 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on April 6, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)

 

21.1

*
10.46*Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement, dated August 12, 2009, by and between Royal Gold, Inc. and Compañía Minera Carmen de Andacollo.
21.1*
Royal Gold and Its Subsidiaries

 

23.1

*
23.1*
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

31.1

*
31.1*
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

31.2

*
31.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

32.1

*
32.1*
Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

32.2

*
32.2*
Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*
Filed herewith.

**
Identifies each management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.

*Filed herewith.
**Identifies each management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.

105