UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
   
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 20092010
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    
Commission File Number 001-34426
Astrotech Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Washington91-1273737

(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)
 91-1273737
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
401 Congress Ave. Suite 1650
Austin, Texas 78701

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)


(512) 485-9530
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
   
Title of each class
Common Stock
(no par value)
 Name of each exchange
Common Stock
on which registered
(no par value)
NASDAQ Capital Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.YESo NOþ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.YESo NOþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YESþ NOo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on it corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).YESo NOo
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
       
Large accelerated filero Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filero Smaller reporting companyþ
    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).YESo NOþ
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price of such stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on such date of $0.26$1.92 was approximately $4,262,107$31,807,035 as of December 31, 2008.2009.
As of September 22, 2009, 16,510,218August 25, 2010, 19,238,988 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, no par value, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Information called for in Part IIIoutstanding, including 1,540,203 shares of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year in connectionrestricted stock with the registrant’s annual meeting of shareholders.voting rights.
 
 

 

 


 

Table of Contents
     
  1 
     
  21 
     
  76 
     
  910 
     
  910 
     
  1011 
     
  1011 
     
  1011 
     
  1011 
     
  1415 
     
  1516 
     
  2224 
     
  2324 
     
  4746 
     
  47 
     
  47 
     
  48 
     
  48 
     
  4853 
     
  4866 
     
  4868 
     
  4868 
     
  4970 
     
  4970 
     
  5680 
     
 Exhibit 2110.55
Exhibit 10.56
Exhibit 10.57
Exhibit 10.58
Exhibit 10.59
Exhibit 10.60
Exhibit 10.61
Exhibit 10.63
 Exhibit 23.1
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

i


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws. Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “will,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends” and other similar expressions. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in the statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
 The effect of economic conditions in the U.S.United States or other space faring nations that could impact our ability to access space and support or gain customers;
 
 Uncertainty about, and ourOur ability to raise sufficient capital to meet our long and short-term liquidity requirements;
 
 Our ability to successfully pursue our business plan;
 
 Whether we will fully realize the economic benefits under our NASA and other customer contracts;
 
 Continued availability and use of the U.S. Space Shuttle and the International Space Station;
 
 Technological difficulties and potential legal claims arising from any technological difficulties;
 
 Product demand and market acceptance risks, including our ability to develop and sell products and services to be used by the manned and unmanned space programs that replace the Space Shuttle Program;
 
 Uncertainty in government funding and support for key space programs;
 
 The impact of competition on our ability to win new contracts;
 
 Uncertainty in securing reliable and consistent access to space;
 
 Delays in the timing of performance of other contracts; and
 
 Risks described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Form 10-K.
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and, therefore we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in our forward-looking statements, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Some of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements are more fully described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, or in the documents incorporated by reference herein. Except as may be required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or advise of any change in any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In making these statements, we disclaim any obligation to address or update each factor in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or communications regarding our business or results, and we do not undertake to address how any of these factors may have caused changes to discussions or information contained in previous filings or communications. In addition, any of the matters discussed above may have affected our past results and may affect future results, so that our actual results may differ materially from those expressed in this Form 10-K and in prior or subsequent communications.

ii


PART I
DEFINITIONS
As used in this Form 10-K, the abbreviations and acronyms contained herein have the meanings set forth below. Additionally, the terms “Astrotech”, “the Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Astrotech Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
ARESARES Corporation
ASOAstrotech Space Operations
AstriumAstrium GmbH (formerly EADS Space Transportation)
ATVAutomated Transfer Vehicle
BoeingThe Boeing Company
CCAFSCape Canaveral Air Force Station
COTSCommercial Orbital Transportation Services
CRADACooperative Research and Development Agreement
DOTDepartment of Transportation
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles
HTVH-II Transfer Vehicle
ICCIntegrated Cargo Carrier
IDIQIndefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity
ISSInternational Space Station
KSCKennedy Space Center
Lockheed MartinLockheed Martin Corporation
NASANational Aeronautics and Space Administration
PI&CProgram Integration and Control
ReALMSResearch and Logistics Mission Support
SAASpace Act Agreement
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards
SMI PlanSpace Media, Inc. Stock Option Plan
SOXSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
SPACEHABSPACEHAB, Inc., the legacy name of the Astrotech Corporation
SSISpaceport Systems International
USAFUnited States Air Force
VAFBVandenberg Air Force Base
VCCVertical Cargo Carrier

1


Item 1.
Item 1. Business.
Our Company
Astrotech Corporation (Nasdaq: ASTC) (“Astrotech”,Astrotech,” “the Company”, “we”,Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is one of the first independenta commercial aerospace company that provides spacecraft payload processing and related services, designs and manufactures space businesses inhardware, and commercializes space technologies for use on Earth. The Company serves the U.S. Government and remains a strong entrepreneurial leader in the aerospace industry. Since its incorporation in Washington in 1984, the Company has been a leader in the commercial space industry in preparingsatellite and sending satellites, cargo and science into space.
Thespacecraft customers with our pre-launch services from our Astrotech Space Operations (“ASO”) business unitsubsidiary and incubates space technology businesses now focusing on two companies: 1st Detect Corporation (“1st Detect), which is developing a Miniature Chemical Detector first developed for the International Space Station; and Astrogenetix, Inc. (“Astrogenetix”), which is utilizing the unique microgravity environment of space to develop novel therapeutic products.
Astrotech was formed in 1984 to leverage the environment of space for commercial purposes. For the last 26 years, the Company has unsurpassedremained a crucial player in space commerce activities. We have supported the launch of 23 shuttle missions and more than 280 spacecraft, built space hardware and processing facilities, and prepared and processed scientific research for microgravity.
We offer products and services in the following areas:
Facilities and support services necessary for the preparation of satellites and payloads for launch.
Commercialization of space-based technologies into real-world applications.
Expertise in qualifying hardware for spaceflight and the habitability and occupational challenges of space.
The Company has experience supporting both manned and unmanned missions to space with product and service support which includesincluding space hardware design and manufacturing, research and logistics expertise, engineering and support services, and payload processing and integration. Through new Spacetech business initiatives such as 1st1st Detect and Astrogenetix, and AirWard, Astrotech continues to paveis paving the way in the commercialization of space by translating space-based technology into terrestrial applications.
Our Business Units
Our Company is currently comprised of two primary business units, which provide the following products and services to the government and commercial markets:
Astrotech Space Operations(“ASO”):
ASO is the leading commercial supplier of satellite launch processing services in the United States. ASO provides processing support tofor government and commercial customers for their complex communication, earth observation and deep space satellites. ASO’s elite spacecraft processing facilities are among the elite in the industry, with more than 300,000over 150,000 square feet of space,clean rooms that can support the largest five-meter class satellites.satellites, encompassing the majority of U.S. based satellite preparation services. ASO has provided launch processing support for government and commercial customers for nearlymore than a quarter century, successfully processing more than 270280 spacecraft. Additionally,


ASO has developedaccounted for 100% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended June 30, 2010 (See Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.) Revenue for our ASO business unit is primarily generated from various fixed-priced contracts with launch service providers in both the commercial and government markets. The services and facilities we provide to our customers support the final assembly, checkout, and countdown functions associated with preparing a proprietary, turn-key approachspacecraft for launch. The revenue and cash flows generated from our ASO operations are related to the total satellite life cycle, leveragingnumber of spacecraft launches, which reflects the Company’s legacygrowth in ground processing operations, engineeringthe satellite-based communications industries and support services. By offering the satellite customer mission designrequirement to replace aging satellites. Other factors that have impacted, and planning, groundare expected to continue to impact earnings and launch operations, and mission operations and end-user enhancement, ASO ensures End-to-End Mission Assurancecash flows for its customers.this business include:
Our ability to control our capital expenditures, which are primarily limited to modifications to accommodate payload processing for new launch vehicles, upgrading communications infrastructure and other building improvements.
The continuing limited availability of competing facilities at the major domestic launch sites that can offer comparable services, leading to an increase in government use of our services.
Our ability to complete customer specified facility modifications within budgeted costs and time commitments.
Our ability to control and reduce costs in order to maximize profitability of our fixed-priced contracts.
OtherSpacetech:
Our OtherSpacetech business unit is an incubator envisionedintended to commercializedevelop space-industry technologies into real-worldcommercial applications to be sold to consumers and industry. The Other business unitSpacetech has developed three business initiatives to date: 1st1st Detect Corporation, Astrogenetix and AirWard. 1st DetectAirWard Corporation (“AirWard”). 1st Detect’s business began under a Space Act Agreement with NASAthe National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) for a chemical detection unit to be used on the ISS. 1stInternational Space Station. 1st Detect engineers have developed a Miniature Chemical Detector, whichbased on mass spectrometry, that we believe is a breakthrough device in the mass spectrometer market that fillswill fill a niche by being highly accurate, lightweight, battery-powered, durable and inexpensive. Astrogenetix is among one of the first commerciala biotechnology companiescompany created to use the unique environment of space to discover and develop medicines.novel therapeutic products. A natural extension of the many years of experience preparing, launching, and operating over 1,500 sciencescientific payloads in space, Astrogenetix is in the process of developing medicinesproducts from microgravity experiments.discoveries. AirWard Corporation has designed manufactured and soldmanufactured shipping containers to transport oxygen bottles and oxygen generators for commercial aircraftaircraft. Further investment in AirWard was suspended in February 2010, as a solutionthe initiative has not yielded the anticipated return for shareholders.
Noncontrolling Interest
In January 2010, restricted shares of Astrotech subsidiaries 1st Detect and Astrogenetix were granted to certain employees, directors and officers, resulting in Astrotech owning less than 100% of these subsidiaries. The Company applied non-controlling interest accounting for the U.S. Departmentperiod ended June 30, 2010, which requires us to clearly identify the non-controlling interest in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated income statements. We disclose three measures of Transportation’s mandate stipulating that U.S. airlines must adherenet income: net income, net income attributable to stringent containment requirements to protect these potentially volatile payloads from flame, heatnoncontrolling interest, and impact during flight.
Governance
We were founded in 1984 as a Washington State Corporation. In 2009, we changed our namenet income attributable to Astrotech CorporationCorporation. Our operating cash flows in our consolidated statements of cash flows reflect net income, while our basic and diluted earnings per share calculations reflect net income attributable to Astrotech Corporation.
     
Beginning balance at July 1, 2009
 $ 
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  (588)
Issuance of restricted stock and warrants  1,826 
State of Texas Funding  900 
Stock based compensation  116 
    
Ending balance at June 30, 2010
 $2,254 
    
As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s share of income and losses is 86% for 1st Detect and 79% for Astrogenetix.
Business Strategy
Astrotech Space Operations
As the leading commercial satellite processing provider, ASO is continuously working to secure additional government and commercial customers that require our services.
Spacetech
1st Detect has developed a revolutionary chemical detector based on ion trap mass spectrometry, which allows for the device’s portability, versatility, sensitivity, durability, high speed and low cost. Potential markets that 1st Detect may serve include Security and Defense, Industrial, Medical and Healthcare, Critical Infrastructure, and First Responders.


Astrogenetix is currently focused on submitting an Initial New Drug application with the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for a Salmonella vaccine as part of the ongoing commercialization strategy. Concurrently, we are using the final two scheduled Space Shuttle flights to complete the on-orbit processing of our next vaccine biomarker discovery, methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (“MRSA”).
Products and Services
Astrotech Space Operations
From our state of the art facilities in Titusville, Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Base (“VAFB”) in California we have provided support for pre-launch ground based operations for 26 years for both commercial and government satellites, and we are the leader in this service sector.
Spacetech
1st Detect’s Miniature Chemical Detector is a universal chemical analyzer that provides rapid analysis time and is capable of detecting residues and vapors from SPACEHAB, Inc. We maintain an Internet Web site at www.astrotechcorp.com. Our reportsa wide range of chemicals including explosives, chemical warfare agents, toxic chemicals, and volatile organic compounds. 1st Detect’s proprietary technology, leveraging advances in low power electronics and miniaturization technologies developed for the space program, allows for the device’s portability, versatility, sensitivity, durability, efficiency and low cost.
Astrogenetix has discovered a Salmonella vaccine candidate, which validates the use of microgravity in identifying commercially viable biomarkers. Astrogenetix’s capabilities include preparing microgravity payloads that can be flown on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q,a variety of launch systems, including the Space Shuttle, the Russian Soyuz, Progress and Photon, the European Automated Transfer Vehicle, the Japanese H-II Transfer Vehicle, and the SpaceX Dragon (still under development). The Astrogenetix Microgravity Processing Platform has been developed to grow microbes in space that can result in significant advantages over traditional earthbound vaccine discovery processes, thus reducing the development time and cost significantly.
Customers, Sales and Marketing
Astrotech Space Operations
ASO services a variety of domestic and international government and commercial customers sending satellites to low-earth-orbit or geosynchronous orbit. ASO has long-term contracts in place with NASA, other U.S. Governmental agencies, United Launch Alliance, and Sea Launch, LLC. During fiscal year 2010, ASO accounted for 100% of our consolidated revenues.
Spacetech
The broadband nature of the 1st Detect technology, as well as amendmentsthe high performance provided by the ion trap architecture, opens up 1st Detect to those reportsa variety of applications. Potential markets that 1st Detect may serve include Security and press releases are available, free of charge,Defense, Industrial, Medical and Healthcare, Critical Infrastructure, and First Responders.
While there have been no sales to date, likely customers for Astrogenetix will be large international pharmaceutical companies and smaller biotechnology companies. Astrogenetix is currently focused on our web site as soon as reasonably practical after filingstarting the FDA process with the SEC. Information containedSalmonella vaccine candidate and is continuing drug development work for other vaccine targets, including MRSA.
Most recently, Astrogenetix testing samples were included in the latest shuttle Discovery launch, STS-132. The 1st Detect Miniature Chemical Detector debuted at the American Society of Mass Spectrometry Conference in June 2008, during which several companies demonstrated significant interest in the product. Currently, several operational units have been manufactured including a boxed unit and a bench-top development unit. In tandem, we are working on our website is not a partthe development of this Form 10-K. Our Committee Chartersan additional technical capability, which will increase accuracy, increase auto-tuning capability, and Code of Conduct are also available on our web site. Our Chief Executive Officerreduce size and Chief Financial Officer executed the required SOX Sections 302 and 906 certifications relating to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are filed with the SEC as Exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K.cost.


Competition
Competitive StrengthsAstrotech Space Operations
The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from ASO, which processes satellites for U.S. launch locations. The only significant competition to ASO’s facilities is from similarcommercial competitor Spaceport Systems International (“SSI”) and certain U.S. governmentGovernment facilities. However, we believe that the majority of domestic satellites, including mostmany government satellites, are processed at AstrotechASO due to the state-of-the-art, professionally operated, full-service environment.
In anticipation of the planned Space Shuttle retirement and due to the loss of the research and logistics module contract, the Company has been refocusing its efforts towards building on our industry-leading ground support operations of ASO and offering a more comprehensive set of services to government and commercial satellite customers.

2


ASTROTECH SPACE OPERATIONS
Our core business is ASO, with spacecraft and payload processing facilities strategically located to support launches from both Florida and California. We are proud of our history, where we have supported over 270 missions in 25 years without negatively impacting a customer’s launch schedule. As a commercial gateway to space, ASO provides world-class ground processing services for both foreign and domestic customers seeking the pre-launch preparation of satellites and payloads. In an industry where execution is paramount despite constantly changing customer launch manifests and processing schedules, ASO has consistently delivered unparalleled customer support. ASO has developed and has begun to offer anEnd-to-End Mission Assurancecapability to serve satellite customers before, during, and after the launch. This initiative is intended to meet an increasing demand from commercial and government customers for new cost-effective and reliable alternatives in the satellite services market.
Products/Services – With more than 300,000 square feet of space owned or managed by ASO, we have provided facilities for pre-launch ground based operations for 25 years for both commercial and government satellites and we are the leader in this service sector.
Market/Customers – ASO services a variety of domestic and international government and commercial customers sending satellites to low-earth-orbit (LEO) or geosynchronous orbit (GEO). ASO has long-term contracts in place with NASA, other U.S. governmental agencies, United Launch Alliance, and Sea Launch, LLC. During fiscal year 2009, ASO accounted for 97% of our consolidated revenues.
As of June 30, 2009, our contract backlog and projected revenue concentration rests primarily with ASO. The ASO contract backlog consists of contracts for future services, contractually guaranteed minimum activity contracts, committed missions under IDIQ contracts and other contractual arrangements. As of June 30, 2009, our contractual backlog and scheduled but uncommitted missions represented the following revenues:
             
Contract FY2010  FY2011  Total 
ASO Missions  20,339,115   3,809,942   24,149,057 
Facility Programs  1,036,338   196,797   1,233,135 
          
Total Backlog  21,375,453   4,006,739   25,382,192 
          
For fiscal year 2010, ASO’s backlog consists of fixed-price satellite missions from various government and commercial entities requiring pre-launch processing services at its Titusville, Florida and VAFB locations.
Growth Strategy – As a leading satellite processing provider, Astrotech is expanding its service offerings beyond ground operations services to offer a comprehensive relationship with each satellite before, during and after launch. This new expanded service offering, End-to-End-Mission-Assurance, includes mission design and planning, ground and launch operations, mission operations and data management.
CompetitionDue to the logistical complications of transporting spacecraft internationally, our ASO business unit generally does not compete with launch services based in other countries. ASO has two primary competitors in the payload processing services marketplace in the U.S.:
Commercial
SSI – SSI operates and manages a commercial spaceport at VAFB and is a provider of payload processing and launch services for both commercial and government users. The SSI facility throughput capability is significantly less than that of ASO in VAFB and it is heavily influenced by government customers. The ASO VAFB contract award for the five-meter high bay construction significantly improves ASO’s competitive advantage at VAFB. SSI does not provide payload processing services in support of the CCAFSCape Canaveral Air Force Station (“CCAFS”) / KSCKennedy Space Center (“KSC”) launch site, and therefore, does not compete with ASO in Florida.
Governmental
NASA and the USAFUnited States Air Force own and operate payload processing facilities at both the CCAFS / KSC/KSC and VAFB launch sites. These facilities, however, are used to process select government spacecraft only. They are not used to process commercial spacecraft. Therefore, ASO’s competition from the U.S. Government is limited in scope.

3


OTHERSpacetech
Astrotech has established a business incubatorThere are many incumbent vendors that selects various qualified technologies that use space-related engineering and technology. The three business initiatives to date are as follows:
1st Detect:
will compete with 1st Detect began development of a miniature mass spectrometer for use on the ISS under a SAA with NASA in 2005. Based on the Company’s belief that such a device has numerous commercial applications,Detect’s Miniature Chemical Detector. However, we began parallel development of a light weight, low power chemical analyzer named 1st Detect. We believe that this device represents a breakthrough in the mass spectrometer market, filling a niche in the marketplace by being accurate, light weight, battery powered, durable, inexpensive and providing a rapid reading of the identified substance.
Products/Services – A mass spectrometer is a universal chemical analyzer that measures the constituent chemicals in a sample by measuring the mass to charge ratio (m/z) of the atoms and/or molecules for which the sample is comprised. The resulting spectrum is then compared to other known sample spectra to determine the identification of each chemical present. 1st Detect uses a proprietary ion trap technology, allowing for the device’s portability, versatility, sensitivity, durability, efficiency and low cost.
Market/Customers – Given its light weight, ability to run on batteries and relatively low price point, we expect that 1st Detect will open markets that were previously not available to competing units. Potential markets that 1st Detect may serve include Security and Defense, Industrial, Medical and Healthcare, Critical Infrastructure, and First Responders.
Growth Strategy – As we continue development of the 1st Detect product, we are seeking to partner with existing chemical detection/equipment companies where our product could benefit from established distribution channels.
Competition – There are many portable mini mass spectrometer competitors. We believe the 1st Detect product offers a combination of attributes that are currently unavailable in the marketplace in a single product.
Astrogenetix:
Astrogenetix was created to commercialize biotechnology products developed in microgravity (“micro-g”), a unique environment only found in space. We are currently utilizing our 25 year heritage of having sent over 1,500 science experiments to space for NASA, to develop both hardware and procedures needed for drug development utilizing microgravity. Significant Milestones include:
Our comprehensive evaluation of the most promising micro-g experiments has led us to believe that commercializing a salmonella vaccine developed in space holds the lowest risk and highest return compared to other potential products reviewed.
In 2008, Astrogenetix entered into a formal Space Act Agreement with NASA allowing us to develop products in the Space Shuttle and on the ISS.
A contract between Astrogenetix and the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center was signed on February 2008 under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (“CRADA”). The CRADA secured both the exclusive rights to the intellectual property of the salmonella vaccines discovered in micro-g (not including active duty military personnel), and the exclusive rights to utilize VA laboratories and scientists for pre-flight preparation and post-flight analysis.
Astrogenetix secured the rights from NASA to occupy a mid-deck locker on STS-123, STS-124, STS-126, STS-119, STS-125 and STS-128 as part of NASA’s National Lab Pathfinder Missions.
Astrogenetix has identified a vaccine candidate for Salmonella.
Product/Service – Astrogenetix’s capabilities include preparing microgravity payloads that can be flown on a variety of launch systems, including the Space Shuttle, the Russian Soyuz, Progress and Photon, the European ATV, the Japanese HTV and the SpaceX Dragon (still under development). Our Vaccine Processing Platform (“VPP”) has been developed to grow microbes in space that, under ideal conditions, can result in significant advantages over traditional earthbound vaccine discovery processes, thus reducing the development time significantly.
Market/Customers – While there have been no sales to date, likely customers will be large international pharmaceutical companies and smaller biotechnology companies. Astrogenetix is currently focused on starting the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) process with the salmonella vaccine and is continuing drug development work for other vaccine targets, including Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA).

4


Growth Strategy – Our growth strategy is to commercialize the salmonella vaccine by progressing into initial FDA testing. Meanwhile, we will fly other selected vaccine targets to microgravity in available spacecraft. There are six additional Space Shuttle flights until the scheduled retirement of the fleet. While NASA may add more Space Shuttle flights, our business strategy assumes that there will be no further flights after the current manifest.
CompetitionThere are many earthbound developers of vaccines, including most large pharmaceutical companies and many smaller biotechnology firms. WhileHowever, there are no known competitors to Astrogenetix developing vaccines in microgravitymicrogravity. With the construction of the ISS nearing completion, and with the recent delivery of both the European Space Agency (“ESA”) and the Japanese Space Agency (“JAXA”) nodes on the ISS, competition from foreign governments, academia and commercial companies is anticipated.
AirWard:
The AirWard Containers were developed to fully meet and exceed all of the applicable requirements of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) that are to become effective in October 2009.
Product/Services – The AirWard thermal resistant transportation containers serve the commercial domestic airline industry by providing protective containers for transportation of hazardous materials. AirWard has met the DOT’s stringent requirements, which will apply to all domestic and U.S.-bound airlines, effective October 2009.
Market/Customers – Since the successful completion of the rigorous certification requirements established by DOT for hazardous containment, AirWard has presented its product to many of the domestic commercial airlines as well as regulatory bodies. AirWard began marketing directly to commercial airlines through the Company’s sales staff and announced its first shipment in 2009.
Growth/Strategy – Applying experience in the development of specialized containers for transporting goods in space, we have developed and certified a containment system to meet the DOT’s 2009 requirements.
Competition – There are several other viable competitors providing hazardous containers that claim to meet DOT’s new requirements. Americase and Viking Packaging Specialists are known competitors.
Research and Development
We incurred $2.3$2.8 million and $1.4$2.3 million in research and development expense during fiscal years 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively. Research and development in fiscal year 20092010 has been primarily directed towards development of our 1st Detect mini-mass spectrometer productDetect’s Miniature Chemical Detector and Astrogenetix microgravity processing platform.Astrogenetix’s Microgravity Processing Platform. Astrogenetix continues to work on processing its FDA application for its salmonellaSalmonella vaccine candidate while continuing research onalso researching other potential vaccines, including MRSA. Most recently, Astrogenetix testing samples were included in


Backlog
The Company’s 18-month rolling backlog at June 30, 2010, which includes contractual backlog and scheduled but uncommitted missions, is $24.9 million. The majority of the latest shuttle Discoverybacklog is for ASO pre-launch satellite processing services, which include hardware launch STS-128. preparation, advance planning, use of unique satellite preparation facilities and spacecraft checkout, encapsulation, fueling, and transport.
     
(In thousands) 18-Month Rolling 
Contract Backlog 
ASO Missions $20,659 
Facility Programs  4,203 
    
Total Backlog
 $24,862 
    
The 1st Detect chemical detector debuted18-month rolling backlog consists of fixed-price satellite missions from various government and commercial entities requiring pre-launch processing services at the American Society of Mass Spectrometry Conference in June 2008, during which several companies demonstrated significant interest in the product. Currently, several operational units have been manufactured including a boxed unitour Titusville, Florida and a bench-top development unit. In tandem, we are working on the development of an additional technical capability, which will increase accuracy, increase auto-tuning capability, and reduce size and cost.VAFB locations.
Certain Regulatory Matters
We are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations designed to protect the environment and to regulate the discharge of materials into the environment in order to protect our domestic technology from unintended foreign exploitation and to regulate certain business practices. We believe that our policies, practices and procedures are properly designed to prevent unreasonable risk of environmental damage and consequential financial liability to us. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations and technology export requirements has not had in the past, and, we believe, will not have in the future, material effects on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position. Our operations are also subject to various regulations under federal laws relative to the international transfer of technology, as well as to various federal and state laws relative to business operations. In addition, we are subject to federal contracting procedures, audit, and oversight.

5


Significant federal regulations impacting our operations include the following:
Federal Regulation of International Business. We are subject to various federal regulations as it relates to the export of certain goods, services, and technology. These regulations, which include the Export Administration Act of 1979 administered by the Commerce Department and the Arms Export Control Act administered by the State Department, impose substantial restrictions on the sharing or transfer of technology to foreign entities. Our activities in the development of space technology and in the processing of commercial satellites deal with the type of technology subject to these regulations. Our operations are conducted pursuant to a comprehensive export compliance policy that provides close review and documentation of activities subject to these laws and regulations.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act establishes rules for U.S. companies doing business internationally. Compliance with these rules is achieved through established and enforced corporate policies, and documented procedures in our internal procedures, and financial controls.
Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000. This act includes specific prohibitions on commercial activities with certain specified Russian entities engaged in providing goods or services to the International Space Station. Our activities with Rocket Space Corporation, Energia of Russia, are not subject to this act.
Federal Acquisition Regulations. Goods and services provided by us to NASA and other U.S. Government agencies are subject to Federal Acquisition Regulations. These regulations provide rules and procedures for invoicing, documenting, and conducting business under contract with such entities. The Federal Acquisition Regulations also subject us to audit by federal auditors to confirm such compliance.
Truth in Negotiations Act. The Truth in Negotiations Act was enacted for the purpose of providing full and fair disclosure by contractors in the conduct of negotiations with the U.S. Government. The most significant provision included in the Truth in Negotiations Act is the requirement that contractors submit certified cost and pricing data for negotiated procurements above a defined threshold.
Defense Security Service. Occasionally, we are requested to process government spacecraft payloads that must be handled under federal security clearances. To accommodate these requirements, we maintain facility security clearances within certain subsidiaries of the Company and have persons engaged by the Company with necessary active security clearances to support these requirements. Maintenance of an active facility clearance requires dedicated trained personnel, specified facility standards and recordkeeping.


Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management
We maintain compliance with regulatory requirements and manage our risks through a program of compliance, awareness, and insurance, which includes the following:
Safety. We place a continual emphasis on safety throughout our organization. At the corporate level, safety programs and training are monitored by a corporate safety manager.
Export Control Compliance. We have a designated senior officer responsible for export control issues and the procedures detailed in our export control policy. This officer and the designated export compliance administrator monitor training and compliance with regulations relative to foreign business activities. Employees are provided comprehensive training in compliance with regulations relative to export and foreign activities through our interactive training program and are certified as proficient in such regulations as are relative to their job responsibilities.
Insurance. Our operations are subject to the hazards associated with operating assets in the severe environment of space. These hazards include the risk of loss or damage to the assets during storage, preparation for launch, in transit to the launch site, and during the space mission itself. We maintain insurance coverage against these hazards with reputable insurance underwriters.
Employees Update
As of June 30, 2009,2010, we employed 7671 regular full-time employees, none of which were covered by any collective bargaining agreements.
OnIn June 2010, General (Ret.) Lance W. Lord resigned from the Board of Directors of Astrotech and as the Chief Executive Officer of Astrotech Space Operations. The vacancy on the Board of Directors created by General Lord’s resignation is not expected to be filled until the next annual meeting. The position of Chief Executive Officer, Astrotech Space Operations, will remain open pending a review of internal and external candidates.
In July 21,2010, the Company simultaneously announced the termination of James Royston, President of Astrotech Corporation, and a realignment of its corporate structure in order to optimize operational efficiencies. The Company’s action follows an evaluation of each business and a review of strategic alternatives. The corporate realignment will allow Astrotech to put a greater focus on the pre-launch satellite service offering of its ASO business unit. The Company has no immediate plans to fill the vacancy created by Mr. Royston’s termination.
In July 2009, the Board of Directors appointed John Porter as Astrotech’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Porter, a Senior Vice President of the Company, had been serving as interim CFO since the resignation of Brian K. Harrington on June 4, 2009.

6


Item 1A.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Given the inherent uncertainty and complexity of the businesses that we engage in, our results from operations and financial condition could be materially adversely impacted as set forth below. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, may also impact our business operations.
Our success depends significantly on the establishment and maintenance of successful relationships with our customers.
We have relied on governmental customers for a substantial portion of our revenue. Approximately 65%49% of our revenue in fiscal year 20092010 was generated by various NASA and U.S. Government contracts or subcontracts. The loss of these partnerscustomers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot make any assurances that theyany customer will require our services in the future, thereforewefuture. Therefore, we continue to work on diversifying our customer base to include other government agencies and commercial industries, while going to great lengths to satisfy the needs of our current customer base.


Termination of our future orders could negatively impact our revenues.
As ofThe Company’s rolling backlog at June 30, 2009,2010, which includes contractual backlog and scheduled but uncommitted missions, is $24.9 million. The majority is for ASO had a backlogpre-launch satellite processing services, which include hardware launch preparation; advance planning; use of approximately $25.4 million. Backlog consistsunique satellite preparation facilities; and spacecraft checkout, encapsulation, fueling and transport. Since some of the remaining contract values that have not been recognized. Approximately 95% of ASO’s contract backlog as of June 30, 2009, was derived from mission contracts. Since our government contracts are contingent upon congressional appropriations and can be terminated “for convenience,” we cannot assure that our backlog will ultimately result in revenues.
A branch of the U.S. Government or a commercial competitor could construct spacecraft ground processing facilities, which could significantly reduce the number of missions using Astrotech facilities.
Astrotech provides services for domestic launch sites. In the event that the U.S. Government constructs spacecraft ground processing facilities would compete withfor the launch sites currently serviced by Astrotech, there could be a reduced need for the use of Astrotech facilities. This would result in direct competition for our existing customers in connection towith servicing domestic launch sites, which could significantly reduce our revenues. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against any new competitor in this area or that these competitive pressures we may face will not result in reduced revenues and market share.
Compliance with environmental and other government regulations could be costly and could negatively affect our financial condition.
Our business, particularly our ASO business unit, is subject to numerous laws and regulations governing the operation and maintenance of our facilities and the release or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances, including spacecraft fuels and oxidizers, into the environment. Under these laws and regulations, we could be liable for personal injury and cleaning costs and other environmental and property damages, as well as administrative, civil, and criminal penalties. In the event of a violation of these laws, or a release of hazardous substances at or from our facilities, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
As a U.S. Government contractor, we are subject to a number of rules and regulations, the violation of which could result in us being barred from future U.S. Government contracts.
We must comply with, and are affected by, laws and regulations relating to the award, administration, and performance of U.S. Government contracts. These laws and regulations, among other things:
 Require certification and disclosure of all cost or pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations.
 
 Impose acquisition regulations that define allowable and unallowable costs and otherwise govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based U.S. Government contracts.
 
 Restrict the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the exportation of certain products and technical data.
A violation of specific laws and regulations could result in the imposition of fines and penalties, the termination of our contracts, or disbarment from bidding on U.S. Government contracts. Additionally, U.S. Government contracts generally contain provisions that allow the U.S. Government to unilaterally suspend us from receiving new contracts pending resolution of alleged violations of certain federal laws or regulations, reduce the value of existing contracts, issue modifications to a contract, and control and potentially prohibit the export of our services and associated materials. Prohibition against bidding on future U.S. Government contracts would have a material adverse affecteffect on our financial condition and results of operations.


Our failure to comply with U.S. export control laws and regulations could adversely affect our business.
We are obligated by law and under contract to comply, and to ensure that our subcontractors comply, with all U.S. export control laws and regulations, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations and the Export Administration Regulations. We are responsible for obtaining all necessary licenses or other approvals, if required, for exports of hardware, technical data, and software, or for the provision of technical assistance. We are also required to obtain export licenses, if required, before utilizing foreign persons in the performance of our contracts if the foreign person will have access to export-controlled technical data or software. The violation of any of the applicable export control laws and regulations, whether by us or any of our subcontractors, could subject us to administrative, civil, and criminal penalties.

7


Our business could be adversely affected by a negative audit by the U.S. Government.
U.S. Government agencies, including NASA, routinely audit and investigate government contractors. These agencies review a contractor’s performance under its contracts, cost structure, and compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and standards. The U.S. Government may also review the adequacy of, and a contractor’s compliance with, its internal control systems and policies, including the contractor’s purchasing, property, estimating, compensation, and management information systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed, while such costs already reimbursed must be refunded. If an audit uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines, and suspension or prohibition from doing business with the U.S. Government. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm that affectsmay affect our non-governmental business if allegations of impropriety were made against us.
Our Spacetech business unit is in an early development stage. It has earned no revenues and it is uncertain whether it will earn any revenues in the future or whether it will ultimately be profitable.
Our Spacetech business unit is in an early development stage with no commercial sales and a limited operating history. Its future operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise including, but not limited to, risks related to capital requirements, failure to establish business relationships and competitive disadvantages as against larger and more established companies. The Spacetech business unit will require substantial amounts of funding to develop, test, and commercialize its products. If such funding comes in the form of equity financing, such equity financing may involve substantial dilution to existing shareholders. Even with funding, our product development program may not lead to commercial products, either because our product candidates fail to be effective or are not attractive to the market or because we lack the necessary financial or other resources or relationships to pursue our programs through commercialization.
The Spacetech business unit can be expected to experience significant operating losses until it can generate sufficient revenues to cover its operating costs. The Spacetech business unit currently has no commercial products and there can be no assurance that the business will be able to develop, manufacture or market any products in the future, that future revenues will be significant, that any sales will be profitable or that the business will have sufficient funds available to complete its marketing and development programs or to market any products which it may develop.
Any products and technologies developed and manufactured by our Spacetech business unit may require regulatory approval prior to being made, marketed, sold, and used. There can be no assurance that regulatory approval of any products will be obtained.
The commercial success of the Spacetech business unit is expected to depend, in part, on obtaining patent and other intellectual property protection for the technologies contained in any products it develops. In addition, the Spacetech business unit may need to license intellectual property to commercialize future products or avoid infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. There can be no assurance that licenses will be available on acceptable terms and conditions, if at all. The Spacetech business unit may suffer if any licenses terminate, if the licensors fail to abide by the terms of the license or fail to prevent infringement by third parties, if the licensed patents or other rights are found to be invalid, or if the Spacetech business unit is unable to enter into necessary licenses on acceptable terms. If the Spacetech business unit, or any third party, from whom it licenses intellectual property, fails to obtain adequate patent or other intellectual property protection for intellectual property covering its products, or if any protection is reduced or eliminated, others could use the intellectual property covering the products, resulting in harm to the competitive business position of the Spacetech business unit. In addition, patent and other intellectual property protection may not provide the Spacetech business unit with a competitive advantage against competitors that devise ways of making competitive products without infringing any patents that the Spacetech business unit owns or has rights to. Such competition could adversely affect the prices for any products or the market share of the Spacetech business unit and could have a material adverse effect upon its results of operations and financial condition.


Our facilities located in Florida and California are susceptible to damage caused by hurricanes, earthquakes, or other natural disasters.
Our ASO spacecraft processing facilities on the east coast of Florida are susceptible to damage caused by hurricanes or other natural disasters. In addition, our leased launch processing facilities at VAFB and the facilities we operate at the Port of Long Beach are subject to damage caused by earthquakes. Although we insure our properties and maintain business interruption insurance, there can be no guarantee that the coverage would be sufficient. A natural disaster could result in a temporary or permanent closure of our business operations, thus impacting our future financial performance.
Due to our dependence on the timing of spacecraft launches, our results may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.
The use of our ASO spacecraft processing facilities is highly dependent upon the number of satellite launches planned and executed each year. Additionally, factors beyond our direct control, such as a delay or accident at a launch vehicle support facility, could cause a material change in our financial results. As a result, significant fluctuations should be expected from quarter to quarter in our operating results.
The loss of key management and other employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are dependent on the personal efforts and abilities of our senior management, and our success will also depend on our ability to attract and retain additional qualified employees. Failure to attract personnel sufficiently qualified to execute our strategy, or to retain existing key personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If we are unable to anticipate technological advances and customer requirements in the commercial and governmental markets, our business and financial condition willmay be adversely affected.
Our business strategy outlines the use of decades of experience to expand the services and products we offer to both the governmentalgovernment agencies and commercial industries. We believe that our growth and future financial performance depend upon our ability to anticipate technological advances and customer requirements. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve the necessary technological advances for us to remain competitive. In 2009,fiscal year 2010, we continued new business initiatives for advancing commerce in space. These new business initiatives will require substantial investments of capital and technical expertise. Our failure to anticipate or respond adequately to changes in technologytechnological and market requirements, or delays in additional product development or introduction, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial performance. Additionally, the cost of capital to fund these businesses will likely require dilution of shareholders.
Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to pay off or refinance our indebtedness with near-term maturities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
We cannot assure that our business will generate cash flows from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to pay our maturing indebtedness as it fallscomes due. As a result, we may need to refinance all or a portion of the debt or we may need to secure new financing before maturity. We cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain financing on reasonable terms or at all, particularly given the general economic situation and lending environment we currently face.
Our earnings and margins may vary due to the nature of our fixed-priced contracts.
Our business mix includes cost-reimbursable and fixed-price contracts. Cost-reimbursable contracts generally have lower profit margins than fixed-price contracts. Our ASO business unit contracts are mainly fixed-price contracts. If we are unable to control costs we incur in performing under the contract, our financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

8


Additionally, the costs incurred to operate our core ASO business are near-term fixed. As a result, if we are not able to schedule payload processing in order to optimize our facilities our financial results could be adversely affected.
We plan to develop new products and services. No assurances can be given that we will be able to successfully develop these products and services.
Our business strategy outlines the use of the decades of experience we have accumulated to expand the services and products we offer to both governmentU.S. Government and commercial industries. These services and products generally involve the commercial exploitation of space, and involve new and untested technologies and business models. These technologies and business models may not be successful, which could result in the loss of any investment we make in developing them.


Our financial results could be adversely affected if the estimates that we use in accounting for contracts are incorrect and need to be changed.
Contract accounting requires judgment relative to assessing risks, estimating contract revenues and costs, and making assumptions for schedulescheduling and technical issues. We rely on the application of consistent business processes in order to minimize material error and maximize reporting transparency. The estimation of total revenues and cost at completion for many of our contracts is complicated and subject to many unknown variables.
If our performance under a cost reimbursable contract results in an award fee that is lower than we have estimated, we would be required to refund previously billed fee amounts and would have to adjust our revenue recognition accordingly. If our performance was determined to be significantly deficient, we may be required to reimburse our customercustomers for the entire amount of previously billed awards. Changes in underlying assumptions, circumstances, or estimates may adversely affect future period financial performance.
Our spacecraft payload processing facilities are specifically designed to process satellites and other payloads and we would lose a substantial portion of their value if we no longer provide these services.
Our ASO spacecraft processing facilities were built specifically to process satellites and space related payloads. If we were required to terminate the processing businesses, the value of these facilities could be impaired and, as a result, the impact onour financial condition and results of operations willwould likely be negatively impacted.
Our inability to maintain required government security clearances and the impact of foreign ownership or control could result in a loss of potential future spacecraft ground processing and other opportunities.
In order to be a service and product provider for spacecraft ground processing and other related activities, we are required to maintain certain government security clearances and we must comply with laws that limit foreign ownership and control. We may be subject to regulatory action and other sanctions if we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to required security clearances and foreign ownership and control. This could harm our reputation, our prospects for future work, and our operating results.
We incur substantial upfront, non-reimbursable costs in preparing proposals to bid on contracts that we may not be awarded.
Preparing a proposal to bigbid on a contract is generally a three to six month process. This process is labor-intensive and results in the incurrence of substantial costs that are generally not retrievable. Additionally, although we may not be awarded a contract, work performance does not commence for several months following completion of the bidding process. If funding problems by the party awarding the contract or other matters further delay our commencement of work, these delays may lower the value of the contract, or possibly render it unprofitable.
Item 1B.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
Item 2.
Item 2. Properties.
Astrotech relocated its corporate headquarters to Austin, Texas in June 2009. The leased office houses executive management, finance and accounting, and marketing and communication, and human resources.communications. We continue to maintain leased offices in Houston, Texas which accommodateare primarily focused on supporting the engineering export compliance, and contract administration.efforts of Spacetech.
ASO’s headquarters, and Florida operations team, are located in a nine-building complex located on a 62-acre space technology campus in Titusville, Florida. This campus encompasses 140,000 square feet of facility space supporting non-hazardous and hazardous flight hardware processing, payload storage, and customer offices.
In September 2009, we completed construction of a 23,000 square foot payload processing facility at VAFB in California which enhanced our capability to process five-meter class satellite payloads. Additionally, in December 2009, we completed construction of a 5,600 square foot office building used by customers for administrative and operational support of teams processing satellites in the new five-meter payload facility. ASO presently leases the 60-acre site located on VAFB in California, where we own four buildings totaling over 50,000 square feet of space. The present land lease expires in July 2013, with provisions to extend the lease at the request of the lessee and the concurrence of the lessor. Upon final expiration of the land lease, all improvements on the property revert, at the lessor’s option, to the lessor at no cost.
We maintain a separate 52,00058,000 square foot payload processing facility located in Cape Canaveral, Florida. We negotiated an agreement with the Canaveral Port Authority for the lease of the land for a forty-three year period, expiring 2040. Upon expiration of the land lease, all improvements on the property revert at no cost to the lessor. In May 2005, we sold the facility in Cape Canaveral, Florida for $4.8 million. We now lease back 100% of the facility through December 31, 2010, with an option period of an additional five years.

 

910 


ASO presently leases a 60-acre site located on Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, and owns five buildings comprising approximately 40,000 square feet. The term of the present land lease expires in July, 2013, with provisions to extend the lease at the request of the lessee and the concurrence of the lessor. Upon final expiration of the land lease, all improvements on the property revert, at the lessor’s option, to the lessor at no cost. During fiscal year 2007, we began an expansion of this facility that will be completed during fiscal year 2010 that will enhance our capabilities to process five-meter class satellite payloads.
We believe that our current facilities and equipment are generally well maintained and in good condition, and are adequate for our present and foreseeable needs.
Item 3.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
In July 2008, the Company filed a claim with its insurance underwriter for recovery of up to $750,000 in lost revenue resulting from the January 2007 launch failure of the Sea Launch operations. After negotiation with our Insurance Company, Affiliated FM, we received a letter in February 2009 denying coverage. We see no further method of recourse and now consider the matter closed.
Except as above, theThe Company is not a party to any significant pending or threatened proceedings, which in management’s opinion, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operation.
Item 4.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No matters were submitted to a vote of stockholders during the fourth quarter of the year ended June 30, 2009.2010.
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
Effective May 4, 2009, the Company changed its stock trading symbol to “ASTC” from “SPAB” on the NASDAQ Capital Markets stock exchange. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low intra-day bid prices for the periods indicated:
                
Fiscal 2009 High Low 
Fiscal 2010 High Low 
  
First Quarter $0.60 $0.26  $3.84 $0.98 
Second Quarter $0.46 $0.20  $3.66 $1.36 
Third Quarter $0.50 $0.20  $4.06 $1.88 
Fourth Quarter $1.73 $0.40  $3.58 $1.24 
                
Fiscal 2008 High Low 
Fiscal 2009 High Low 
  
First Quarter $6.50 $3.90  $0.60 $0.26 
Second Quarter $3.25 $1.10  $0.46 $0.20 
Third Quarter $2.26 $0.55  $0.50 $0.20 
Fourth Quarter $0.82 $0.37  $1.73 $0.40 
We have never paid cash dividends. It is our present policy to retain earnings to finance the growth and development of our business; therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future.

 

1011 


We have 75,000,000 shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance. As of September 22, 2009August 25, 2010 we had 16,510,21819,238,988 shares of Common Stock outstanding.outstanding, including 1,540,203 shares of restricted stock with voting rights.
In April 2008, we received a NASDAQ Staff Determination letter indicating that we failedEffective May 4, 2009, the Company changed its stock trading symbol to comply with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(4), which requires that we maintain a $1.00 bid price, and our securities were, therefore, subject to delisting“ASTC” from “SPAB” on the NASDAQ Capital Market. In June 2009, we received a letter from the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Staff indicating that we regained compliance with the bid price rule, and are currently in compliance with all continued listing standards.Markets stock exchange.
Astrotech Equity Available for Issuance
            
             Number of securities to Weighted average exercise   
 Number of securities to Weighted average exercise    be issued upon exercise price of outstanding Number of securities 
 be issued upon exercise price of outstanding Number of securities  of outstanding options, options, warrants, and remaining available 
 of outstanding options, options, warrants, and remaining available  warrants, and rights rights for future issuance 
Plan Category warrants, and rights rights for future issuance  (a) (b) (c) 
 (a) (b) (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1,288,387 $2.23 2,656,613  806,541 $1.65 379,389 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders        
              
Total 1,288,387 $2.23 2,656,613  806,541 $1.65 379,389 
              
1st Detect Equity Available for Issuance
             
  Number of securities to  Weighted average exercise    
  be issued upon exercise  price of outstanding  Number of securities 
  of outstanding options,  options, warrants, and  remaining available 
  warrants, and rights  Rights  for future issuance 
Plan Category (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  1,820  $212.00   172,000 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
          
Total  1,820  $212.00   172,000 
          
Astrogenetix Equity Available for Issuance
             
  Number of securities to  Weighted average exercise    
  be issued upon exercise  price of outstanding  Number of securities 
  of outstanding options,  options, warrants, and  remaining available 
  warrants, and rights  rights  for future issuance 
Plan Category (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  2,050  $167.00   190,400 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
          
Total  2,050  $167.00   190,400 
          

 

1112 


Stock Performance Graph
The following performance graph and table do not constitute soliciting material and the performance graph and table should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate the performance graph and table by reference therein.
The performance graph and table below compare the five-year cumulative total return of our common stock with the comparable five-year cumulative total returns of the Standard & Poor’s Aerospace & Defense Stock Index (“S&P Aerospace & Defense”) and the NASDAQ Composite Stock Index (“NASDAQ Composite”). The figures assume an initial investment of $100 at the close of business on June 30, 20042005 in Astrotech Corporation, S&P, and NASDAQ, and the reinvestment of all dividends.
                                                
 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08 6/09  6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08 6/09 6/10 
Astrotech Corporation
 100.00 48.64 32.07 17.66 1.55 3.13  100.00 65.92 36.31 3.19 6.42 6.93 
NASDAQ Composite
 100.00 101.08 109.48 132.58 115.32 91.34  100.00 107.08 130.99 114.02 90.79 105.54 
S&P Aerospace & Defense
 100.00 116.87 139.20 172.87 152.65 116.18  100.00 119.11 147.92 130.62 99.41 122.37 

 

1213 


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In March 2003, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to $1.0 million of our outstanding stock at market prices. Additionally, in September 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock or Senior Convertible Notes payable, up to a cumulative amount of $6.0 million. During the year ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased 300,000 shares at a cost of $0.1 million. To date, a total of 311,660 shares at a cost of $0.2 million have been repurchased by the Company.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
Equity Securities
On February 11, 2008, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with certain investors for the purchase of 55,000 shares of the Company’s Series D convertible preferred stock for a total price of $5.5 million. Consummation of the transaction was contingent upon NASA awarding us a funded Space Act Agreement under the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services Program (“COTS”) and shareholder approval of the transaction. As consideration for investor commitment to this transaction, the Company issued 150,150 shares of common stock upon entering into the transaction. The Company was not awarded a funded Space Act Agreement under COTS and, except for the 150,150 shares issued, the offering was terminated.
Private Placement of Common Stock
On June 5, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors, under which the investors agreed to subscribe for and purchase 1,330,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $0.6 million. The consummation of the transaction under the Securities Purchase Agreement was contingent upon certain customary conditions precedent to each party’s obligation to close. The 1,330,000 shares of common stock issued under the Securities of the Agreement were sold in reliance on an exemption from registration pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D Securities Act of 1933. The Company believes that such issuance of the securities qualified for an exemption under Rule 506 because there were no more than 35 purchasers of securities and each Investor represented at the time of closing that the investor was an “accredited investor” within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D.
(d)
Maximum number
(c)(or approximate
Total number ofdollar value) of
(a)shares (or units)shares (or units) that
Total number of(b)purchased as part ofmay yet be
shares (or units)Average price paidpublicly announcedpurchased under the
Periodpurchasedper share (or unit)plans or programsplans or programs
04/01/10 – 04/30/10
05/01/10 – 05/31/10
06/01/10 – 06/30/10
Total

 

1314 


Item 6.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2009.2010. Such data has been derived from our consolidated financial statements audited by Grant Thornton LLP for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2005 and 2006, and by PMB Helin Donovan, LLP for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2009.2010. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in this annual report.
                                        
 Years Ended June 30,  Years Ended June 30, 
(In Thousands) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 
 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 
 (In thousands) 
Statement of Operations Data:
  
Revenue from operations $59,401 $50,746 $52,762 $25,544 $31,985 
Revenue $27,979 $31,985 $25,544 $52,762 $50,746 
Costs of revenue 47,158  46,855(3)  51,029(5) 19,540 15,723  12,858 15,723 19,540 51,029 46,855 
                      
Gross profit 12,243 3,891 1,733 6,004 16,262  15,121 16,262 6,004 1,733 3,891 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  1,639(1) 10,672  13,762(5)  9,361(8) 9,760  12,170 9,760 9,361 13,762 10,672 
Research and development expenses 77 410 801 1,375 2,330  2,798 2,330 1,375 801 410 
                      
Income (loss) from operations 10,527  (7,191)  (12,830)  (4,732) 4,172 
Interest expense, net of capitalized amounts and other expenses 5,424  5,174(4) 3,531 427 (43)
Income (loss) from operation
 153 4,172  (4,732)  (12,830)  (7,191)
Gain on bond exchange  665    
Debt conversion expense    30,194      (30,194)   
Interest and other expense, net  (459)  (622)  (427)  (3,531)  (5,174)
Income tax benefit (expense) 146  (32) 69  (675) 510   (22) 510  (675) 69  (32)
           
Net income (loss) 5,249  (12,397)  (16,292)  (36,028) 4,725   (328) 4,725  (36,028)  (16,292)  (12,397)
Net income (loss) per common share – basic $4.16 $(9.73) $(12.61) $(4.26) $0.29 
Net income (loss) per common share – diluted $3.70 $(9.73) $(12.61) $(4.26) $0.28 
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common share – basic 1,261 1,274 1,292 9,254 16,365 
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common share – diluted 1,419 1,274 1,292 9,254 16,904 
Cash dividends declared per common share      
           
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  (588)     
           
Net income (loss) attributable to Astrotech Corporation
 260 4,725  (36,028)  (16,292)  (12,397)
           
Net income (loss) per common share — basic $0.02 $0.29 $(4.26) $(12.61) $(9.73)
           
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common share — basic 16,567 16,365 9,254 1,292 1,274 
Net income (loss) per common share — diluted $0.01 $0.28 $(4.26) $(12.61) $(9.73)
           
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per common share — diluted 18,283 16,904 9,254 1,292 1,274 
 
Balance Sheet Data (End of Period):
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents $8,085 $4,730 $2,640 $9,724 $6,317 
Total assets 54,903 58,919 58,211 72,475 85,450 
Current debt 8,467 267 267   
Long-term debt, excluding current portion  8,435 10,387 52,944 63,250 
Stockholders’ equity 42,212 40,548 34,936  (13,131) 2,809 
Working capital (deficit) surplus $2,623 $8,418 $522 $(6,105) $2,753 
  
Other Data:
  
Cash provided by (used in) operations $(7,153) $3,984(4) $6,028(6) $(8,598)(9) $4,989 
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities  17,683(2)  (1,141)  (1,077)(7)  (158)  (1,427)
 
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
 
Working capital (deficit) surplus $5,435 $2,753 $(6,105) $522 $8,418 
Total assets 101,951 85,450 72,475 58,211 58,919 
Long-term debt, excluding current portion 64,885 63,250 52,944 10,387 8,435 
Stockholders’ equity 14,797 2,809  (13,131) 34,936 40,548 
Net cash provided by operating activities $4,437 $4,972 $(8,598) $6,028 $3,984 
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,829)  (1,427)  (158)  (1,077)  (1,141)
Net cash used in financing activities 747  (1,455) 1,672  (1,544)  (3,853)
(1)Includes $7.7 million of net recovery from non-recurring transactions related to the loss of our research double module.
(2)Includes approximately $8.2 million from ReALMS contract indemnification clause related to the loss of our research double module.
(3)Includes approximately $6.3 million of non-cash write downs related to our flight unit 3 and the shuttle based flight assets.
(4)Includes approximately $0.6 million of non-cash charges related to the acceleration of debt placement fees related to the convertible subordinated notes.
(5)Includes approximately $12.5 million of non-cash write downs related to our flight unit 2 and the shuttle based flight assets and a $0.1 million non-cash write down of an investment in Applied Astronautical Corporation.
(6)Includes $5.7 million advance for construction of a payload processing facility. Also includes $3.1 million advance from customer for in-flight insurance for STS-118 that was paid in July 2007 to the insurance carrier.
(7)Includes approximately $6.3 million of restricted cash for the construction of a payload processing facility.
(8)Includes $3.1 million payment for STS-118 flight insurance.
(9)Includes approximately $0.2 million of non-cash write downs related to our inventory.

 

1415 


Item 7.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Overview
Astrotech was formed in 1984 to leverage the environment of space for commercial purposes. For the last 2526 years, the Company has remained a crucial player in space commerce activities. We have supported the launch of 23 shuttle missions and more than 270280 spacecraft, building space hardware and processing facilities, and preparing and processing scientific research for microgravity.
We offer products and services in the following areas:
 Facilities and support services necessary for the preparation of satellites and payloads for launch.
 
 End-to-End Mission Assurance: a turn-key approach to the total satellite lifecycle.
Commercialization of space-based technologies into real-world applications.
 
 Expertise in qualifying hardware for spaceflight and the habitability and occupational challenges of space.
Our Business Units
Astrotech Space Operations (ASO)
ASO provides all necessary support for its government and commercial customers to successfully process complex communication, earth observation and deep space satellites in preparation for their launch on a variety of domestic and foreign launch vehicles. Processing activities include satellite ground transportation; pre-launch hardware integration and testing; satellite encapsulation, fueling, launch pad delivery; and communication linked launch control. Our ASO facilities can accommodate five meter class satellites encompassing the majority of U.S. based satellite preparation services. In addition to satellite processing, ASO offers engineering services capabilities that encompass the entire life cycle of a satellite. During fiscal year 2009, ASO accounted for 97%100% of our consolidated revenues.
revenues for the year ended June 30, 2010. Revenue for our ASO business unit is generated primarily from various fixed-priced contracts with launch service providers in both the commercial and government markets. The services and facilities we provide to our customers support the final assembly, checkout, and countdown functions associated with preparing a spacecraft for launch. The earningsrevenue and cash flows generated from our ASO operations are related to the number of spacecraft launches, which reflects the growth in the satellite-based communications industries and the requirement to replace aging satellites. Other factors that have impacted, and are expected to continue to impact earnings and cash flows for this business include:
  Our ability to control our capital expenditures, which primarily are limited to modifications to accommodate payload processing for new launch vehicles, upgrading communications infrastructure and other building improvements.
 
  The continuing limited availability of competing facilities at the major domestic launch sites that can offer comparable services, leading to an increase in government use of our services.
 
  Our ability to complete customer specified facility modifications within budgeted costs and time commitments.
 
  Our ability to control and reduce costs in order to maximize profitability of our fixed-priced contracts.
New Business Initiatives
Our identified new business initiatives are focused on commercialization of space-based technologies, which is a natural extension of our 25 years of space industry experience and our core capabilities in these fields. These new business initiatives will require varying investments of capital and technical expertise.
OtherSpacetech
Our Otherother business unit is an incubator envisionedintended to commercialize space-industry technologies into real-worldcommercial applications to be sold to consumers and industry. The 1st Detect Miniature Chemical Detector and the Astrogenetix microgravity processing platform and the AirWard hazardous cargo containers are all initiatives developed under our OtherSpacetech business unit. The 1st Detect Miniature Chemical Detector, offerswhich is in development, is a low power, portable chemical detection device intended to be utilized for a variety of applications. 1st Detect has been awarded a Developmental Testing and Evaluation designation from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as a “promising anti-terrorism technology”, and is the recipient of a Phase I award from the U.S. Army’s Chemical and Biological Defense (CBD)(“CBD”) Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)(“SBIR”) Program. Additionally, 1st Detect received a $1.8 million award from the Texas Emerging Technology Fund. Astrogenetix is performing drug discovery in microgravity and NASA has designated this work as part of the National Lab Pathfinder Missions designed by NASA andMissions. Astrogenetix has identified a vaccine candidate for Salmonella. AirWardSalmonella and is a shipping container designed to meet the specific requirements of the U.S. Department of Transportation for all commercial airlines in U.S. airspace to protect pressurized oxygen bottles from flame and heat during flight.currently conducting microgravity research on MRSA.

 

1516 


Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition.Revenue is derived primarily from contracts to deliver payload processing support and facilities to the U.S. Government and to commercial customers. Revenues under these contracts are recognized using the methods described below. Given the changing launch schedules of our customers, and the changing requirements of the customers in construction contracts, estimating future costs and revenues is a process requiring a high degree of judgment by our management. (See Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our financial results could be adversely affected if the estimates that we use in accounting for contracts are incorrect and need to be changed.) For our satellite payload processing, we base our estimate on historical experience and on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, including the negotiation of equitable adjustments to our fixed-price contracts due to launch delays. For construction contracts, costs to complete include, when appropriate, material, labor, subcontracting costs, lease costs, commissions, insurance, and depreciation. In the event of a change in total estimated contract cost or profit, the cumulative effect of such change is recorded in the period that the change in estimate occurs.
A Summary of Revenue Recognition Methods Follows:
Services/Products ProvidedContract TypeMethod of Revenue Recognition
Satellite Payload Processing Support & FacilitiesFirm Fixed Price — Mission SpecificRatably, over the occupancy period of a satellite within the facility from arrival through launch
Firm Fixed Price — Guaranteed Number of MissionsFor multi-year contract
payments recognized ratably
over the contract period
Facility Construction contractsFirm Fixed PricePercentage-of-completion based
on costs incurred
Engineering ServicesCost Reimbursable
Award/Fixed Fee
Reimbursable costs incurred plus
award/fixed fee
Commercial ProductsSpecific Purchase
Order Based
At shipment
Under certain contracts, we make expenditures for specific enhancements and/or additions to our facilities where the customer agrees to pay a fixed fee to deliver the enhancement or addition. We account for such agreements as a reduction in the cost of such investments and recognize any excess of amounts collected above the expenditure as revenue. Revenue for ASO recognized under a building modification contract with a government agency was accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method based on costs incurred over the period of the agreement.
Long-Lived Asset.In assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, fixed assets, assets under construction and intangible assets, we evaluate the recoverability of those assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that directly affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents amounts collected from customers for projects, products, or services expected to be provided at a future date. Deferred revenue is shown on the balance sheet as either a short-term or long-term liability, depending on when the service or product is expected to be provided.
Share Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based awards to employees based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. The fair value of the stock options is estimated using expected dividend yields of the Company’s stock, the expected volatility of the stock, the expected length of time the options remain outstanding and risk-free interest rates. Changes in one or more of these factors may significantly affect the estimated fair value of the stock options. Additionally, the Company estimates the number of instruments for which the required service is expected to be rendered. The Company estimates forfeitures using historical forfeiture rates for previous grants of equity instruments. The fair value of awards that are expected to vest is recorded as an expense over the vesting period.
Noncontrolling Interest
Noncontrolling interest accounting is applied for any entities where the Company maintains less than 100% ownership. The Company clearly identifies the noncontrolling interest in the balance sheets and income statements. We also disclose three measures of net income: net income, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, and net income attributable to Astrotech Corporation. Our operating cash flows in our consolidated statements of cash flows reflect net income, while our basic and diluted earnings per share calculations reflect net income attributable to Astrotech Corporation.

17 


State of Texas Funding
The Company accounts for the State of Texas funding in its majority owned subsidiary 1st Detect as a contribution of capital and has reflected the disbursement in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet. While the award agreement includes both a common stock purchase right and a note payable to the State of Texas, the economic substance of the transaction is that the State of Texas has purchased shares of 1st Detect in exchange for granted award.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
The following table sets forth the significant components in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended June 30, 2010, compared with 2009. The financial information and the discussion below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands) 2010  2009  Variance 
 
Revenue
 $27,979  $31,985  $(4,006)
Gross profit
  15,121   16,262   (1,141)
Gross margin
  54%  51%  3%
Selling, general and administrative  12,170   9,760   2,410 
Research and development  2,798   2,330   468 
          
Total operating expenses
  14,968   12,090   2,878 
Income from operations  153   4,172   (4,019)
Gain on bond exchange     665   (665)
Interest and other expense, net  (459)  (622)  163 
          
Income (loss) before income taxes  (306)  4,215   (4,521)
Income tax (expense) benefit  (22)  510   (532)
          
Net income (loss)
  (328)  4,725   (5,053)
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  (588)     (588)
          
Net income attributable to Astrotech Corporation
 $260  $4,725  $(4,465)
          
The following table sets forth the percentage of total revenue of certain items in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended June 30, 2010, compared with 2009:
         
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2010  2009 
 
Revenue
  100%  100%
Cost of revenue  46%  49%
       
Gross profit
  54%  51%
       
Operating expenses
        
Selling, general and administrative  44%  31%
Research and development  10%  7%
Total operating expenses
  54%  38%
       
Income (loss) from operations  1%  13%
Gain on bond exchange  %  2%
Interest and other expense, net  (2)%  (2)%
       
Income (loss) before income taxes  (1)%  13%
Income tax (expense) benefit  *   2%
       
Net income (loss)
  (1)%  15%
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  (2)%  %
Net income  attributable to Astrotech Corporation
  1%  15%
*Represents less than 1% of period revenue

18 


Revenue.Total revenue decreased to $28.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $32.0 million at June 30, 2009, due to the completion of construction on the new 5-meter satellite facility and associated building improvement projects at VAFB during the first quarter of 2010, offset partially by processing RSC-Energia’s MRM1 in our Cape Canaveral facility.
A breakdown of revenue for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
         
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands) 2010  2009 
ASO $27,979  $31,856 
Spacetech     129 
       
  $27,979  $31,985 
       
Gross Profit.Gross profit decreased to $15.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $16.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in gross profit was attributable to the decline in revenue, partially offset by a customer contract which was processed at a higher margin.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense.Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $12.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $9.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to additional employee incentive compensation expense, an increase in business development personnel and an increase in outside consulting fees. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 44% for the year ended June 30, 2010, on lower revenue, as compared to 31% for the year ended June 30, 2009.
Research and Development Expense.Research and development expense increased to $2.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $2.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. As a percentage of revenue, research and development increased to 10% for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared with 7% for the year ended June 30, 2009. The increase in expense was the result of our investments in the development of the 1st Detect Miniature Chemical Detector and the Astrogenetix Microgravity Processing Platform.
Gain on bond exchange.In October 2008, the Company repurchased and retired $1.8 million principal amount of its outstanding 5.5% Senior Convertible notes, acquired at an established market price on the day of trade. The Company recognized a gain of $0.7 million on the transaction in the year ended June 30, 2009.
Interest and Other expense, net.Interest and other expense, net, decreased to $0.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $0.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. Interest expense relates to interest on the Senior Convertible Notes and the term loan, offset by interest income primarily from our money market accounts due to the larger cash balance available for investment. Also included in other expense for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is the write-off of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of aerospace metals.

19 


SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Selected financial data for the years ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 of our ASO business unit is as follows:
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands) 2010  2009  Variance 
 
Revenue
 $27,979  $31,856  $(3,877)
Gross profit
  15,125   16,338   (1,213)
Gross margin percentage
  54%  51%  3%
Selling, general and administrative  8,563   8,739   (176)
          
Operating expenses
  8,563   8,739   (176)
          
Interest and other expense, net  (230)  (254)  24 
Income tax expense         
          
Net income
  6,332   7,345   (1,013)
          
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest         
          
Net income attributable to ASO
 $6,332  $7,345  $(1,013)
          
Revenue.Total revenue decreased to $28.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $31.9 million at June 30, 2009, due to the completion of construction on the new 5-meter satellite facility and associated building improvement projects at VAFB during the first quarter of 2010, offset partially by processing RSC-Energia’s MRM1 in our Cape Canaveral facility.
Gross Profit.Gross profit decreased to $15.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $16.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in gross profit was attributable to the decline in revenue, partially offset by a customer contract which was processed at a higher margin.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense.Selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $8.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $8.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily a result of lower administrative fees.
Interest and other expense, net.Interest and other expense, net, decreased to $0.2 million in the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $0.3 million in the year ended June 30, 2009. This relatively consistent expense relates to interest on the term loan, offset by interest earned primarily from our money market accounts. Also included in other expense for the year ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is the write-off of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of aerospace metals.
Selected financial data for the years ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 of our Spacetech business unit is as follows:
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands) 2010  2009  Variance 
 
Revenue
 $  $129  $(129)
Gross loss
  (4)  (76) $72 
Gross margin percentage
  %  (59)%  59%
Selling, general and administrative  3,607   1,021   2,586 
Research and development  2,798   2,330   468 
          
Operating expenses
  6,405   3,351   3,054 
Gain on notes repurchased     665   (665)
Interest and other expense, net  (229)  (368)  139 
Income tax expense  (22)  510   (532)
          
Net loss
  (6,660)  (2,620)  (4,040)
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  (588)     (588)
          
Net loss attributable to Spacetech
 $(6,072) $(2,620) $(3,452)
          

20 


Revenue.Total revenue decreased $0.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, from the year ended June 30, 2009. The revenue in fiscal year 2009 was derived from AirWard, which designed and manufactured shipping containers to transport oxygen bottles and oxygen generators for commercial aircraft. In February 2010, further investment in AirWard was suspended as the initiative has not yielded the anticipated return for shareholders.
Gross loss.The gross loss decreased for AirWard in the year ended June 30, 2010, as the initiative has not yielded the anticipated return for shareholders.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense.Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $3.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $1.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to increased employee incentive compensation expense and an increase in outside consulting fees.
Research and Development Expense.Research and development expense increased to $2.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $2.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The increase in expense was the result of our investments in the development of the 1st Detect Miniature Chemical Detector and the Astrogenetix Microgravity Processing Platform.
Interest and other expense, net.Interest and other expense, net, decreased to $0.2 million in the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $0.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. Interest expense relates to interest on the Senior Convertible Notes, offset by interest earned from our money market accounts.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES, AND LIQUIDITY
Balance Sheet
Our totalTotal assets atfor the year ended June 30, 20092010, were $58.9$54.9 million compared to total assets of $58.2$58.9 million atas of the end of fiscal year 2008.2009. The following table sets forth the significant components of the balance sheet as of June 30, 2009,2010, compared with 20082009 (in thousands):
                        
 Year Ended June 30,  Year Ended June 30, 
 2009 2008 Variance  2010 2009 Variance 
Assets:
  
Current assets $17,600 $7,151 $10,449  $14,964 $17,600 $(2,636)
Property and equipment, net 40,226 40,999  (773) 39,920 40,226  (306)
Other assets, net 1,093 10,061  (8,968) 19 1,093  (1,074)
              
Total $58,919 $58,211 708  $54,903 $58,919 $(4,016)
              
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity:
  
Current liabilities $9,182 $6,629 $2,553 
Current debt $8,467 $267 $8,200 
Other current liabilities 3,874 8,915  (5,041)
Long-term debt 8,435 10,387  (1,952)  8,435  (8,435)
Other long-term liabilities 754 6,259  (5,505) 350 754  (404)
Stockholders’ equity 40,548 34,936 5,612  42,212 40,548 1,664 
              
Total $58,919 $58,211 $708  $54,903 $58,919 $(4,016)
              
Current Assets.assets.An increase inCurrent assets decreased $2.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. The overall decrease relates to collection of accounts receivable, including the collection of $8.4 million resulted primarily from ASO mission contracts,final invoicing on the facility construction at VAFB which were completed but unbilled due to revenue being recognized prior tooutstanding at June 30, 2009, and the milestone billing period. The increase in cash and cash equivalentstiming of $2.0 milliona note receivable which is now includes the remaining cash which was formerly classified as restricted in other assets (net). In fiscal year 2009, the Board of Directors removed the self-imposed restriction, as a majority of the construction for the facility at VAFB was complete.due within one year.

21 


Property and Equipment,equipment, net.Depreciation and amortization expense of $2.2$2.1 million exceeded capital expenditures of $1.4$1.8 million.
Current Liabilities.Other assets, net.Current liabilities increased by $2.6Other assets, net, decreased $1.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 20082009. A note receivable of $0.7 million is due now within the next fiscal year and classified as a resultcurrent asset. The Company also had a partial write off of an increase$0.2 million and a recorded sale of $0.1 million on remaining aerospace metals.
Current and long-term debt. The $5.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes and the $3.4 million term loan are due within the next fiscal year, and therefore, the classification has changed from long-term debt to current debt. The Company made principal payments on the term loan of $0.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2010. Interest is paid bi-annually on the Senior Convertible Notes.
Other current liabilities.Other current liabilities decreased by $5.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. The decrease in accounts payable of $0.4$2.1 million is due to payments made to vendors related to the facility construction at VAFB, which were outstanding at June 30, 2009, as well as timing of payments and an increaseother payments. The decrease in short term deferred revenue of $2.6 million. The short term deferred revenue reflects $1.8$2.7 million related to the increased pre-launch processing activity at ASO and for the Mini Research Module 1 (MRM1).
Long-term debt-less current portion.Long-term debt-less current portion decreased $1.9 million as compared to June 30, 2008, asis a result of the $1.8 million repurchase of outstanding senior convertible notes payablea timing difference between cash collections on payload processing customer contracts and term loan payments of $0.1 million.amounts earned as revenue.
Other long-term liabilities.Other long-term liabilities decreased $5.5$0.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2008,2009. This was primarily due to the fact that a majoritydecrease in non-current deferred revenue of the construction for the facility at VAFB was complete.$0.3 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.1 million and our working capital was approximately $2.6 million, including $0.5 million of cash in 1st Detect available only to fund development of the Miniature Chemical Detector (see Note 13). As of June 30, 2009 we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.7 million and our working capital was approximately $8.4 million. As of June 30, 2008 we had cash and restricted cash-on-hand of $11.0 million and our working capital was approximately $0.5 million. The following is a summary of the change in our cash and cash equivalents for the years ended June 30:equivalents:
         
  2009  2008 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $4,972  $(8,598)
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,427)  (158)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (1,455)  1,672 
       
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $2,090  $(7,084)
       
         
  June 30, 
  2010  2009 
Net cash provided by operating activities $4,437  $4,972 
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,829)  (1,427)
Net cash used in financing activities  747   (1,455)
       
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 $3,355  $2,090 
       

16


Operating Activities
Cash provided by operations for the year ended June 30, 20092010, was $5.0$4.4 million as compared with cash used in operating activities of $8.6$5.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2008.2009. Significant items affecting operating cash flows at June 30, 20092010 were our net loss of $0.3 million and depreciation and amortization of $2.1 million. At June 30, 2009, operating cash flow included net income of $4.7 million and depreciation and amortization of $2.2 million. At June 30, 2008, operating cash flow included a net loss of $36.0 million and depreciation and amortization of $2.7 million. Included in the net loss for fiscal year 2008 was a $30.2 million of expenses related to the bond exchange transactions in October 2007.
Changes in assets and liabilities affecting our operating cash flows for fiscal year 20092010 are as follows:
Assets.Restricted cash decreased $8.4The decrease in accounts receivable of $6.6 million for year endedis primarily attributable to the timing of payments received by the Company, including the collection of amounts due from the U.S. Government on the facility construction at VAFB which were outstanding as of June 30, 2009. The self-imposed restrictionincrease in fiscal year 2008 was designated for use in constructing a government processing facility. In fiscal year 2009, the Boardcash and cash equivalents of Directors removed the self-imposed restriction, as a majority of the construction for the facility at VAFB was complete. Any remaining amount from prior restricted cash$3.4 million is now classified as a current asset in cash.
Accounts receivable increased by $8.4 million during fiscal year 2009 mainlyprimarily due to unbilled contracts with ASO, which represents revenue recognized prior to the milestone billing period.collection of amounts in our accounts receivable.
Liabilities.Advances on the construction contract decreased by $4.9 million in fiscal year 2009. The decrease in advances on the construction contract wasaccounts payable of $2.1 million is due to the fact that a majority of the construction forpayments made to vendors related to the facility construction at VAFB, was complete. ASO receivedwhich were outstanding at June 30, 2009, as well as timing of other payments. The decrease in short term deferred revenue of $2.7 million is a significant portionresult of milestone paymentsa timing difference between cash collections on our contract with a governmental agency to designpayload processing customer contracts and build a new processing facility, which was partially offset by payments to subcontractors for work performed during the period.
Deferred revenue increased $2.0 million in fiscal year 2009. This represents amounts collected from customers for projects, products, or services expected to be provided at a future date.earned as revenue.

22 


Investing ActivitiesSEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In fiscal year 2009, there was an increase in capital improvements related to ASO projects of $0.7 million. Capital expenditures for furniture, fixtures, and equipment and leasehold improvements increased $0.5 million, ASO machinery and equipment of $0.2 million and leasehold improvements on the Houston office location of $0.1 million.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activitiesSelected financial data for the yearyears ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 was $1.5 millionof our ASO business unit is as compared with cash provided by financing activities of $1.7follows:
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands) 2010  2009  Variance 
 
Revenue
 $27,979  $31,856  $(3,877)
Gross profit
  15,125   16,338   (1,213)
Gross margin percentage
  54%  51%  3%
Selling, general and administrative  8,563   8,739   (176)
          
Operating expenses
  8,563   8,739   (176)
          
Interest and other expense, net  (230)  (254)  24 
Income tax expense         
          
Net income
  6,332   7,345   (1,013)
          
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest         
          
Net income attributable to ASO
 $6,332  $7,345  $(1,013)
          
Revenue.Total revenue decreased to $28.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. In fiscal year 2009, the Company purchased $1.82010, as compared to $31.9 million in principal amount of its outstanding senior convertible notes offset by a gain of $0.7 million. The Company also made payments for the term loan of $0.1 million and repurchased $0.1 million in treasury stock. In 2008, the Company received $0.7 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock and $3.8 million in net proceeds received from the term loan facility.
Exchange Offer.In October 2007, we announced the successful closing of our offer to exchange (the “Exchange Offer”) our outstanding 8.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007 (the “Junior Notes”) and our outstanding 5.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2010 (the “Senior Notes”). As a result of the closing of the Exchange Offer, for the approximately $7.4 million in principal amount of Junior Notes tendered, the holders received approximately 550,000 shares of common stock and 9,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on a pre-reverse split basis. Following the closing of the Exchange Offer, approximately $2.9 million of Junior Notes remained outstanding pursuant to the original terms of the indenture governing the Junior Notes. On October 15, 2007 we redeemed the outstanding Junior Notes, including accrued interest, for cash. In addition, for the approximately $46.1 million in principal amount of outstanding Senior Notes tendered, the holders received approximately 30.7 million shares of common stock and 46,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on a pre-reverse split basis. Following the closing of the Exchange Offer, approximately $6.9 million of Senior Notes remained outstanding pursuant to an indenture governing the Senior Notes that was amended through the elimination of substantially all of the indenture’s restrictive covenants.
In addition, as a result of the closing of the Restructuring and Exchange Agreement, effective August 31, 2007, among the Company and certain holders of Junior Notes and Senior Notes, the Company issued to Astrium 1,333,000 shares of common stock and 7,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on a pre-reverse split basis in exchange for Astrium’s existing 1,333,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock .
As a consequence of the Exchange Offer, we recognized non-cash debt conversion expense of $30.2 million in fiscal year 2008, and we increased our common stock by $98.4 million.

17


In November 2007, we converted the 62,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock into 89.9 million shares of Common Stock on a pre-reverse split basis and affected a 1 for 10 reverse stock split, reducing our issued and outstanding common stock to 13.6 million shares. All share amounts have been stated to reflect this split for all periods presented.
Debt Facilities.On February 6, 2008, we entered into a financing facility providing a $4.0 million term loan terminating February 2011 and a $2.0 million revolving credit facility terminating in February 2009. The term loan requires monthly payments of principal, plus interest at the rate of prime plus 1.75% and the revolving credit facility incurs interest at the rate of prime plus 1.75%. Effective February 2009, we renewed the $2.0 million revolving credit facility for an additional one-year period expiring February 2010. The renewal changed the interest rate to the bank’s prime rate plus 0.75%. The bank financing facilities are secured by the assets of our ASO Florida facilities and other bank covenants. The balance of the $4.0 million term loan at June 30, 2009, was $3.6 million. Asdue to the completion of June 30, 2009, there was no balance outstandingconstruction on the $2.0 million revolving creditnew 5-meter satellite facility and associated building improvement projects at VAFB during the first quarter of 2010, offset partially by processing RSC-Energia’s MRM1 in our Cape Canaveral facility.
Securities Purchase.Gross Profit.In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company issued 1,330,000 shares of common stockGross profit decreased to “accredited investors” for the consideration of $0.6 million.
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition.Revenue is derived primarily from contracts with the U.S. Government and commercial customers. Revenues under these contracts are recognized using the methods described below. Estimating future costs and, therefore, revenues and profits is a process requiring a high degree of judgment by our management. (See Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—our financial results could be affected if the estimates that we use in accounting for contracts are incorrect and need to be changed.) We base our estimate on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, including the negotiation of equitable adjustments to our fixed-price contracts due to launch delays. Costs to complete our contracts include, when appropriate, material, labor, subcontracting costs, lease costs, commissions, insurance, and depreciation. In the event of a change in total estimated contract cost or profit, the cumulative effect of such change is recorded in the period that the change in estimate occurs.
A Summary of Revenue Recognition Methods Follows:
Services/Products ProvidedContract TypeMethod of Revenue Recognition
Payload Processing FacilitiesFirm Fixed Price – Mission SpecificRatably, over the occupancy period of a satellite within the facility from arrival through launch
Firm Fixed Price – Guaranteed Number of MissionsFor multi-year contract payments recognized ratably over the contract period
Commercial Space Habitat Modules, Integration & Operations Support Services and Construction contracts.Firm Fixed PricePercentage-of-completion based
on costs incurred
Configuration Management,
Engineering Services
Cost Reimbursable
Award/Fixed Fee
Reimbursable costs incurred plus
award/fixed fee
Commercial ProductsSpecific Purchase
Order Based
At shipment, based primarily on criteria of SAB 104
Long-Lived Asset.In assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, fixed assets, assets under construction and intangible assets, we evaluate the recoverability of those assets in accordance with the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

18


CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
The following table sets forth the significant components in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as of June 30, 2009, compared with 2008. The financial information and the discussion below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
             
(In thousands, unless otherwise indicated) 2009  2008  Variance 
 
Revenue
 $31,985  $25,544  $6,441 
Gross profit
 $16,262  $6,004  $10,258 
Gross margin percentage
  51%  24%  27%
Operating expenses
 $12,090  $10,736  $1,354 
Other
 $553  $(31,296) $31,849 
          
Net income (loss)
 $4,725  $(36,028) $40,753 
          
The following table sets forth the percentage of total revenue of certain items in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as of June 30, 2009, compared with 2008:
         
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008 
 
Revenue
  100%  100%
Cost of revenue  49%  77%
       
Gross profit
  51%  24%
       
Operating expenses
        
Selling, general and administrative expense  31%  36%
Research and development expense  7%  5%
Asset impairment charge     *
       
Total operating expenses
  38%  41%
       
Gain (loss) from operations  13%  (19)%
Debt Conversion Expense     (118)%
Gain on bond exchange  2%   
Interest and Other expense, net  (2)%  (6)%
Gain (loss) before income taxes  13%  (138)%
Income tax (expense) benefit  2%  * 
       
Net income (loss)
  15%  (141)%
       
*
Represents less than 0.1% of period revenue.
Revenue.Total revenue increased to $31.9$15.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2009,2010, as compared to $25.5 million at June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to an increased launch schedule at ASO and additional revenue associated with a majority of the construction for the facility at VAFB, offset by a decrease in 2008 revenue sources related to the Lockheed Martin Cargo Mission contract, the ARES PI&C and supported Sea Launch missions, which did not recur in 2009.

19


A breakdown of revenue for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
         
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands, unless otherwise indicated) 2009  2008 
ASO $31,154  $15,810 
Other  831   9,734 
       
  $31,985  $25,544 
       
Gross Profit.Gross profit increased to $16.2$16.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2009, as compared2009. The decrease in gross profit was attributable to $6.0the decline in revenue, partially offset by a customer contract which was processed at a higher margin.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense.Selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $8.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. The gross profit margin more than doubled2010, as compared to reach 51%$8.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2009, up2009. This decrease is primarily a result of lower administrative fees.
Interest and other expense, net.Interest and other expense, net, decreased to $0.2 million in the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $0.3 million in the year ended June 30, 2009. This relatively consistent expense relates to interest on the term loan, offset by interest earned primarily from 24%our money market accounts. Also included in other expense for the year ended June 30, 2008.2010 and 2009 is the write-off of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of aerospace metals.
Selected financial data for the years ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 of our Spacetech business unit is as follows:
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands) 2010  2009  Variance 
 
Revenue
 $  $129  $(129)
Gross loss
  (4)  (76) $72 
Gross margin percentage
  %  (59)%  59%
Selling, general and administrative  3,607   1,021   2,586 
Research and development  2,798   2,330   468 
          
Operating expenses
  6,405   3,351   3,054 
Gain on notes repurchased     665   (665)
Interest and other expense, net  (229)  (368)  139 
Income tax expense  (22)  510   (532)
          
Net loss
  (6,660)  (2,620)  (4,040)
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  (588)     (588)
          
Net loss attributable to Spacetech
 $(6,072) $(2,620) $(3,452)
          

20 


Revenue.Total revenue decreased $0.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, from the year ended June 30, 2009. The increaserevenue in fiscal year 2009 was derived from AirWard, which designed and manufactured shipping containers to transport oxygen bottles and oxygen generators for commercial aircraft. In February 2010, further investment in AirWard was suspended as the initiative has not yielded the anticipated return for shareholders.
Gross loss.The gross profit was primarily attributable to an increaseloss decreased for AirWard in overall payload processing volume and the mix of revenue shifting to more profitable fixed-price satellite processing and construction projects from cost-plus contracting.year ended June 30, 2010, as the initiative has not yielded the anticipated return for shareholders.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense.Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $9.8$3.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009,2010, as compared to $9.1$1.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. As a percentage of Revenue, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses decreased to 31% in 2009 as compared to 36% in 2008.2009. The increase was primarily attributable to externalincreased employee incentive compensation expense and an increase in outside consulting fees relating to engineering proposal services, partially offset by a reduction in headcount and a reduction in equity compensation expenses.fees.
Research and Development Expense.Research and development expense increased to $2.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $2.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 as compared2009. The increase in expense was the result of our investments in the development of the 1st Detect Miniature Chemical Detector and the Astrogenetix Microgravity Processing Platform.
Interest and other expense, net.Interest and other expense, net, decreased to $1.4$0.2 million forin the year ended June 30, 2008. As a percentage of revenue, research and development increased to 7% in 2009 as compared with 5% in 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to the Other business units, which increased investment costs to develop the mini-mass spectrometer and the Astrogenetix micro-gravity processing platform.
Debt Conversion Expense.In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we announced the successful closing of our Exchange Offer resulting in the substantial reduction of our Senior and Junior notes. As a consequence of the Exchange Offer, we recognized non-cash debt conversion expense of $30.2 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2008. In fiscal year 2009, there was no debt conversion expense incurred.
Gain on bond exchange.In October 2008, the Company repurchased and retired $1.8 million principal amount of its outstanding 5.5% Senior Convertible notes, acquired at an established market price on the day of trade. Company Director Mr. R. Scott Nieboer was a beneficial owner of the repurchased securities. The Company recognized a gain of $0.7 million on the transaction in fiscal year 2009.
Interest and Other expense, net.Interest and Other expense, net, increased to $0.6 million for the year ended June 30, 20092010, as compared to $0.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2008.2009. Interest Expense for 2009expense relates to interest on the senior convertible subordinated note and the term note,Senior Convertible Notes, offset by interest income mainlyearned from our money market. Also included in other expensemarket accounts.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES, AND LIQUIDITY
Balance Sheet
Total assets for the year ended June 30, 2010, were $54.9 million compared to total assets of $58.9 million as of the end of fiscal year 2009. The following table sets forth the significant components of the balance sheet as of June 30, 2010, compared with 2009 (in thousands):
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2010  2009  Variance 
Assets:
            
Current assets $14,964  $17,600  $(2,636)
Property and equipment, net  39,920   40,226   (306)
Other assets, net  19   1,093   (1,074)
          
Total $54,903  $58,919  $(4,016)
          
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity:
            
Current debt $8,467  $267  $8,200 
Other current liabilities  3,874   8,915   (5,041)
Long-term debt     8,435   (8,435)
Other long-term liabilities  350   754   (404)
Stockholders’ equity  42,212   40,548   1,664 
          
Total $54,903  $58,919  $(4,016)
          
Current assets.Current assets decreased $2.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. The overall decrease relates to collection of accounts receivable, including the collection of final invoicing on the facility construction at VAFB which were outstanding at June 30, 2009, and the timing of a note receivable which is the write-off of $0.1 million of aerospace metals.now classified as due within one year.

 

2021 


Property and equipment, net.Depreciation and amortization expense of $2.1 million exceeded capital expenditures of $1.8 million.
Other assets, net.Other assets, net, decreased $1.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. A note receivable of $0.7 million is due now within the next fiscal year and classified as a current asset. The Company also had a partial write off of $0.2 million and a recorded sale of $0.1 million on remaining aerospace metals.
Current and long-term debt. The $5.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes and the $3.4 million term loan are due within the next fiscal year, and therefore, the classification has changed from long-term debt to current debt. The Company made principal payments on the term loan of $0.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2010. Interest is paid bi-annually on the Senior Convertible Notes.
Other current liabilities.Other current liabilities decreased by $5.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. The decrease in accounts payable of $2.1 million is due to payments made to vendors related to the facility construction at VAFB, which were outstanding at June 30, 2009, as well as timing of other payments. The decrease in short term deferred revenue of $2.7 million is a result of a timing difference between cash collections on payload processing customer contracts and amounts earned as revenue.
Other long-term liabilities.Other long-term liabilities decreased $0.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. This was primarily due to a decrease in non-current deferred revenue of $0.3 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.1 million and our working capital was approximately $2.6 million, including $0.5 million of cash in 1st Detect available only to fund development of the Miniature Chemical Detector (see Note 13). As of June 30, 2009 we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.7 million and our working capital was approximately $8.4 million. The following is a summary of the change in our cash and cash equivalents:
         
  June 30, 
  2010  2009 
Net cash provided by operating activities $4,437  $4,972 
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,829)  (1,427)
Net cash used in financing activities  747   (1,455)
       
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 $3,355  $2,090 
       
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operations for the year ended June 30, 2010, was $4.4 million as compared with $5.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. Significant items affecting operating cash flows at June 30, 2010 were our net loss of $0.3 million and depreciation and amortization of $2.1 million. At June 30, 2009, operating cash flow included net income of $4.7 million and depreciation and amortization of $2.2 million.
Changes in assets and liabilities affecting our operating cash flows for fiscal year 2010 are as follows:
Assets.The decrease in accounts receivable of $6.6 million is primarily attributable to the timing of payments received by the Company, including the collection of amounts due from the U.S. Government on the facility construction at VAFB which were outstanding as of June 30, 2009. The increase in cash and cash equivalents of $3.4 million is primarily due to the collection of amounts in our accounts receivable.
Liabilities.The decrease in accounts payable of $2.1 million is due to payments made to vendors related to the facility construction at VAFB, which were outstanding at June 30, 2009, as well as timing of other payments. The decrease in short term deferred revenue of $2.7 million is a result of a timing difference between cash collections on payload processing customer contracts and amounts earned as revenue.

22 


SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Selected financial data for the years ended June 30, 20092010, and 20082009 of our ASO business unit is as follows:
                        
 Year Ended June 30,  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands, unless otherwise indicated) 2009 2008 Variance 
(In thousands) 2010 2009 Variance 
Revenue
 $31,154 $15,810 $15,344  $27,979 $31,856 $(3,877)
Gross profit
 $17,431 $6,177 $11,254  15,125 16,338  (1,213)
Gross margin percentage
  56%  39%  17%  54%  51%  3%
Selling, general and administrative 8,563 8,739  (176)
       
Operating expenses
 $7,737 $4,388 $3,349  8,563 8,739  (176)
Other
  (187) 174  (361)
              
Net Income
 $9,507 $1,963 $7,544 
Interest and other expense, net  (230)  (254) 24 
Income tax expense    
              
Net income
 6,332 7,345  (1,013)
       
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest    
       
Net income attributable to ASO
 $6,332 $7,345 $(1,013)
       
Revenue.Total revenue increaseddecreased to $31.1$28.0 million for the year ended June 30, 20092010, as compared to $15.8$31.9 million at June 30, 2008. This was primarily attributable2009, due to increased payloadthe completion of construction on the new 5-meter satellite facility and associated building improvement projects at VAFB during the first quarter of 2010, offset partially by processing and additional revenue associated with the construction of the facility at VAFB.RSC-Energia’s MRM1 in our Cape Canaveral facility.
Gross Profit.Gross profit increaseddecreased to $17.4$15.1 million for the year ended June 30, 20092010, as compared to $6.2$16.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2008.2009. The increasedecrease in gross profit is primarilywas attributable to the overall increasedecline in payload processing activityrevenue, partially offset by a customer contract which was processed at our Floridaa higher margin.
Selling, General and VAFB locations, combined with effective cost controls during the construction of the new facility at VAFB.
Operating Expenses.Administrative Expense.Operating expenses increasedSelling, general and administrative expense decreased to $7.7$8.6 million for the year ended June 30, 20092010, as compared to $4.4$8.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. The increase was2009. This decrease is primarily attributablea result of lower administrative fees.
Interest and other expense, net.Interest and other expense, net, decreased to increased selling, general$0.2 million in the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $0.3 million in the year ended June 30, 2009. This relatively consistent expense relates to interest on the term loan, offset by interest earned primarily from our money market accounts. Also included in other expense for the year ended June 30, 2010 and administrative costs that resulted from focusing most2009 is the write-off of the Company’s resources on ASO as our core business.$0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of aerospace metals.
Selected financial data for the years ended June 30, 20092010, and 20082009 of our OtherSpacetech business unit is as follows:
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands, unless otherwise indicated) 2009  2008  Variance 
 
Revenue
 $831  $9,734  $(8,903)
Gross profit (loss)
 $(1,169) $(173) $( 996)
Gross margin percentage
  (141)%  (2)%  (139)%
Operating expenses
 $4,353  $6,348  $(1,995)
Other
  740   (31,470)  (32,210)
          
Net (loss)
 $(4,782) $(37,991) $33,209 
          
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
(In thousands) 2010  2009  Variance 
 
Revenue
 $  $129  $(129)
Gross loss
  (4)  (76) $72 
Gross margin percentage
  %  (59)%  59%
Selling, general and administrative  3,607   1,021   2,586 
Research and development  2,798   2,330   468 
          
Operating expenses
  6,405   3,351   3,054 
Gain on notes repurchased     665   (665)
Interest and other expense, net  (229)  (368)  139 
Income tax expense  (22)  510   (532)
          
Net loss
  (6,660)  (2,620)  (4,040)
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  (588)     (588)
          
Net loss attributable to Spacetech
 $(6,072) $(2,620) $(3,452)
          

 

2120 


Revenue.Total revenue decreased to $0.8$0.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $9.7 million at2010, from the year ended June 30, 2008. This decrease of $8.9 million2009. The revenue in fiscal year 2009 was primarily duederived from AirWard, which designed and manufactured shipping containers to revenue sources related totransport oxygen bottles and oxygen generators for commercial aircraft. In February 2010, further investment in AirWard was suspended as the 2008 Lockheed Martin Cargo Mission contract,initiative has not yielded the ARES PI&C contract and delivery of flight hardware, which did not recur in 2009.anticipated return for shareholders.
Gross Profit (loss).loss.The total gross loss decreased for AirWard in the year ended June 30, 2010, as the initiative has not yielded the anticipated return for shareholders.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense.Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $1.2$3.6 million for the year ended June 30, 20092010, as compared to a gross loss of $0.2$1.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2008.2009. The increase in the loss iswas primarily attributable to decreased revenueincreased employee incentive compensation expense and an increase in our 2008 cost-plus contracts, which directly utilized more of our engineering workforce in completion of our contractual commitments.outside consulting fees.
Operating Expenses.Research and Development Expense.Operating Expenses decreasedResearch and development expense increased to $4.4$2.8 million for the year ended June 30, 20092010, as compared to $6.3$2.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2008.2009. The increase in expense was the result of our investments in the development of the 1st Detect Miniature Chemical Detector and the Astrogenetix Microgravity Processing Platform.
Interest and other expense, net.Interest and other expense, net, decreased to $0.2 million in the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $0.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. Interest expense relates to interest on the Senior Convertible Notes, offset by interest earned from our money market accounts.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES, AND LIQUIDITY
Balance Sheet
Total assets for the year ended June 30, 2010, were $54.9 million compared to total assets of $58.9 million as of the end of fiscal year 2009. The following table sets forth the significant components of the balance sheet as of June 30, 2010, compared with 2009 (in thousands):
             
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2010  2009  Variance 
Assets:
            
Current assets $14,964  $17,600  $(2,636)
Property and equipment, net  39,920   40,226   (306)
Other assets, net  19   1,093   (1,074)
          
Total $54,903  $58,919  $(4,016)
          
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity:
            
Current debt $8,467  $267  $8,200 
Other current liabilities  3,874   8,915   (5,041)
Long-term debt     8,435   (8,435)
Other long-term liabilities  350   754   (404)
Stockholders’ equity  42,212   40,548   1,664 
          
Total $54,903  $58,919  $(4,016)
          
Current assets.Current assets decreased $2.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. The overall decrease relates to collection of accounts receivable, including the collection of final invoicing on the facility construction at VAFB which were outstanding at June 30, 2009, and the timing of a note receivable which is now classified as due within one year.

21 


Property and equipment, net.Depreciation and amortization expense of $2.1 million exceeded capital expenditures of $1.8 million.
Other assets, net.Other assets, net, decreased $1.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. A note receivable of $0.7 million is due now within the next fiscal year and classified as a current asset. The Company also had a partial write off of $0.2 million and a recorded sale of $0.1 million on remaining aerospace metals.
Current and long-term debt. The $5.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes and the $3.4 million term loan are due within the next fiscal year, and therefore, the classification has changed from long-term debt to current debt. The Company made principal payments on the term loan of $0.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2010. Interest is paid bi-annually on the Senior Convertible Notes.
Other current liabilities.Other current liabilities decreased by $5.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. The decrease in accounts payable of $2.1 million is due to payments made to vendors related to the facility construction at VAFB, which were outstanding at June 30, 2009, as well as timing of other payments. The decrease in short term deferred revenue of $2.7 million is a result of a timing difference between cash collections on payload processing customer contracts and amounts earned as revenue.
Other long-term liabilities.Other long-term liabilities decreased $0.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, as compared to June 30, 2009. This was primarily due to a decrease in non-current deferred revenue of $0.3 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.1 million and our working capital was approximately $2.6 million, including $0.5 million of cash in 1st Detect available only to fund development of the Miniature Chemical Detector (see Note 13). As of June 30, 2009 we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.7 million and our working capital was approximately $8.4 million. The following is a summary of the change in our cash and cash equivalents:
         
  June 30, 
  2010  2009 
Net cash provided by operating activities $4,437  $4,972 
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,829)  (1,427)
Net cash used in financing activities  747   (1,455)
       
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 $3,355  $2,090 
       
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operations for the year ended June 30, 2010, was $4.4 million as compared with $5.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. Significant items affecting operating cash flows at June 30, 2010 were our net loss of $0.3 million and depreciation and amortization of $2.1 million. At June 30, 2009, operating cash flow included net income of $4.7 million and depreciation and amortization of $2.2 million.
Changes in assets and liabilities affecting our operating cash flows for fiscal year 2010 are as follows:
Assets.The decrease in accounts receivable of $6.6 million is primarily attributable to decreased selling, generalthe timing of payments received by the Company, including the collection of amounts due from the U.S. Government on the facility construction at VAFB which were outstanding as of June 30, 2009. The increase in cash and cash equivalents of $3.4 million is primarily due to the collection of amounts in our accounts receivable.
Liabilities.The decrease in accounts payable of $2.1 million is due to payments made to vendors related to the facility construction at VAFB, which were outstanding at June 30, 2009, as well as timing of other payments. The decrease in short term deferred revenue of $2.7 million is a result of a timing difference between cash collections on payload processing customer contracts and amounts earned as revenue.

22 


Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the year ended June 30, 2010, was $1.8 million as compared with $1.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. In fiscal year 2010, capital expenditures for payload processing facilities related to ASO were $1.8 million, which included construction of an administrative expenses that resultedcustomer support building at VAFB.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2010, was $0.7 million as compared with cash used in financing activities of $1.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. In fiscal year 2010, the Company received $0.1 million in proceeds from focusing moreissuance of common stock and 1st Detect received $0.9 million from the Texas Emerging Technology Fund (See Note 13). This was offset by the $0.3 million in principal payments the Company made on the term loan. In fiscal year 2009, the Company purchased $1.8 million of the Company’s resources awayprincipal amount of its outstanding Senior Convertible Notes offset by a gain of $0.7 million.
Debt Facilities.In February 2008, we entered into a financing facility providing a $4.0 million term loan terminating February 2011 and a $2.0 million revolving credit facility terminating in February 2009. The term loan requires monthly payments of principal, plus interest at the rate of prime plus 1.75% and the revolving credit facility incurs interest at the rate of prime plus 1.75%. Effective February 2010, we renewed the $2.0 million revolving credit facility for an additional one-year period expiring February 2011. The renewal changed the interest rate to the bank’s prime rate plus 0.75%. The bank financing facilities are secured by the assets of our ASO Florida facilities and other bank covenants. The balance of the $4.0 million term loan as of June 30, 2010 was $3.4 million. As of June 30, 2010, there was no balance outstanding on the $2.0 million revolving credit facility.
As of June 30, 20 Astrotech had $5.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes outstanding which mature on October 15, 2010, and pay interest on April 15 and October 15 annually. The $5.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes and the $3.4 million term loan are due within the next fiscal year, and therefore, the classification has changed from long-term debt to current debt.
Contractual Obligations
Leases
The Company is obligated under non-cancelable operating leases for equipment, office space, the Other business unitland for a payload processing facility and certain flight assets. Future minimum payments under these non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
                     
  Payments due by period        
      Less than          More than 5 
Contractual Obligations Total  1 year  1-3 years  3-5 years  years 
Long-Term Debt Obligations               
Capital Lease Obligations               
Operating Lease Obligations $885  $616  $269       
Purchase Obligations               
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Registrant’s Balance Sheet under GAAP               
                
Total $885  $616  $269       
                
Rent expense for the years ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 was approximately $0.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively. For fiscal year 2010, the Company received sublease payments of $0.3 million.

23 


Construction Contract Contingency
In August 2007, we entered into a $14.0 million modification to our core ASO business, offset partiallyexisting VAFB construction contract. The modification required us to complete the construction on the redesigned facility by September 30, 2009. The modification contained penalties of up to $3.0 million if we did not meet the contracted completion date. The construction was complete in September 2009 and no penalties were incurred (See Note 12).
State of Texas Funding
In March 2010, the Texas Emerging Technology Fund awarded 1st Detect $1.8 million for the development and marketing of the Miniature Chemical Detector, a portable mass spectrometer designed to serve the security, healthcare and industrial markets (See Note 13). As of June 30, 2010, 1st Detect has received the first of two $0.9 million disbursements. The disbursed amount of $0.9 million represents a contingency through March 2020, the date of cancellation. If an increaseevent of default should occur, the principal and accrued interest would be reclassified from equity to notes payable in research and development for our new business initiatives.the consolidated financial statements as amounts due to the State of Texas. Management considers the likelihood of an event of default to be remote.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2010.
Item 7A.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Our primary exposure to market risk relates to interest rates. We do not currently use any interest rate swaps or derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. A one percent change in variable interest rates will not have a material impact on our financial condition.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2009.Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

2224 


Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Astrotech Corporation and Subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Astrotech Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used, and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ PMB HELIN DONOVAN LLP

Austin, Texas
September 28, 2009August 30, 2010

 

2325 


ASTROTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
        
 (Audited)         
 June 30,  June 30, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
Assets
  
Current assets  
Cash and cash equivalents $4,730 $2,640  $8,085 $4,730 
Accounts receivable, net 12,279 3,872  5,676 12,279 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 591 639  528 591 
Short term note receivable 675  
          
Total current assets 17,600 7,151  14,964 17,600 
          
Property and equipment, net 40,226 40,999  39,920 40,226 
Restricted cash  8,386 
Long term note receivable 691 717   691 
Other assets, net 402 958  19 402 
          
Total assets $58,919 $58,211  $54,903 $58,919 
          
  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  
Current liabilities  
Accounts payable 859 2,965 
Accrued liabilities and other 2,083 2,356 
Deferred revenue 854 3,594 
Senior convertible subordinated notes payable — 5.5% 5,111  
Term note payable $267 $267  3,356 267 
Accounts payable 2,965 2,599 
Deferred revenue 3,594 1,007 
Accrued liabilities and other 2,356 2,756 
Other 78  
          
Total current liabilities 9,182 6,629  12,341 9,182 
          
Advances on construction contract  4,863 
Deferred revenue 649 1,227  350 649 
Senior convertible subordinated notes payable – 5.5% 5,111 6,861 
Other liabilities  105 
Senior convertible subordinated notes payable — 5.5%  5,111 
Term note payable, net of current portion 3,324 3,526   3,324 
Other 105 169 
          
Total liabilities 18,371 23,275  12,691 18,371 
          
  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)   
 
Stockholders’ equity  
Preferred stock, no par value, convertible, 2,500,000 authorized shares, 0 issued and outstanding shares, at June 30, 2009 and 2008 (liquidation of $12,000)   
Common stock, no par value, 75,000,000 and 75,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively, 16,754,378 and 14,966,038 shares issued at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively 183,341 183,306 
Preferred stock, no par value, convertible, 2,500,000 authorized shares, 0 issued and outstanding shares, at June 30, 2010 and 2009   
Common stock, no par value, 75,000,000 and 75,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively, 17,081,543 and 16,754,378 shares issued at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively 183,515 183,341 
Treasury stock, 311,660 shares at cost  (237)  (117)  (237)  (237)
Additional paid-in capital 1,663 691  639 1,663 
Retained earnings  (144,219)  (148,944)
Retained deficit  (143,959)  (144,219)
Noncontrolling interest 2,254  
          
Total stockholders’ equity 40,548 34,936  42,212 40,548 
          
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $58,919 $58,211  $54,903 $58,919 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

2426 


ASTROTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
                
 Twelve Months Ended June 30,  Year Ended June 30, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
 
Revenue $31,985 $25,544  $27,979 $31,985 
 
Costs of revenue 15,723 19,540  12,858 15,723 
          
 
Gross profit 16,262 6,004  15,121 16,262 
     
      
Operating expenses  
Selling, general and administrative 9,760 9,148  12,170 9,760 
Research and development 2,330 1,375  2,798 2,330 
Asset impairment charge  213 
     
      
Total operating expenses 12,090 10,736  14,968 12,090 
          
Income from operations
 153 4,172 
      
Income (loss) from operations 4,172  (4,732)
Debt conversion expense   (30,194)
Gain on bond exchange 665    665 
Interest and other expense, net  (622)  (427)  (459)  (622)
          
 
Income (loss) before income taxes 4,215  (35,353)  (306) 4,215 
 
Income tax benefit (expense) 510  (675)  (22) 510 
          
Net income (loss)
  (328) 4,725 
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  (588)  
      
Net Income (loss) $4,725 $(36,028)
Net income attributable to Astrotech Corporation
 $260 $4,725 
          
  
Deemed dividend related to induced conversion of preferred shares   (3,344)
Net Income (loss) applicable to common shares $4,725 $(39,372)
     
 
Net income (loss) per share, basic $0.29 $(4.26)
Net income per share, basic $0.02 $0.29 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic 16,365 9,254  16,567 16,365 
  
Net income (loss) per share, diluted $0.28 $(4.26)
Net income per share, diluted $0.01 $0.28 
Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted 16,904 9,254  18,283 16,904 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

2527 


ASTROTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated StatementsStatement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)
                                 
                  Treasury  Add’l.      Total 
  Convertible Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Stock  Paid-In-  Retained  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Equity 
                                 
Balance at June 30, 2007  1,333  $11,892   1,314  $84,122  $(117) $544  $(109,572) $(13,131)
                         
Stock-based compensation                 147      147 
Common Stock issued under private placements:                                
October 2007        150   168            168 
June 2008        1,330   625            625 
Common stock issued in exchange for outstanding 5.5% senior notes        9,723   70,865            70,865 
Common stock issued in exchange for outstanding 8.0% subordinated notes        1,348   12,290            12,290 
Common stock issued in exchange for preferred stock  (1,333)  (11,892)  1,089   15,236         (3,344)   
Net loss                          (36,028)  (36,028)
                         
                                 
Balance at June 30, 2008        14,954  $183,306  $(117) $691  $(148,944) $34,936 
                         
Stock-based compensation        1,763         972      972 
Treasury stock purchase        (312)     (120)        (120)
Exercised options        38   35            35 
Net Income (loss)                    4,725   4,725 
                         
                                 
Balance at June 30, 2009        16,443  $183,341  $(237) $1,663  $(144,219) $40,548 
                         
                             
  Common Stock  Treasury  Additional      Non-  Total 
  Number of      Stock  Paid- In  Accumulated  Controlling  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Interest  Equity 
                           
Balance at June 30, 2008
  14,954  $183,306  $(117) $691  $(148,944) $  $34,936 
Stock based compensation           972         972 
Treasury stock purchase  (312)     (120)           (120)
Exercise of stock options  38   35               35 
Restricted stock issuance  1,763                         
Net income (loss)               4,725      4,725 
                      
Balance at June 30, 2009
  16,443  $183,341  $(237) $1,663  $(144,219) $  $40,548 
Stock based compensation           862      116   978 
Exercise of stock options  283   174      (60)        114 
Restricted stock issuance  44                   
Issuance of restricted stock and warrants in subsidiaries           (1,826)      1,826    
State of Texas Funding                      900   900 
Net income (loss)              260   (588  (328)
                      
Balance at June 30, 2010
  16,770  $183,515  $(237) $639  $(143,959) $2,254  $42,212 
                      
See the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

2628 


ASTROTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
                
 Twelve Months Ended June 30,  Year Ended June 30, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
Cash flows from operating activities  
Net Income (loss) $4,725 $(36,028)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities: 
Gain on note repurchase  (665)  
Net income (loss) $(328) $4,725 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Stock-based compensation 338 800  978 338 
Depreciation and amortization 2,209 2,668  2,135 2,209 
Gain on note repurchase   (665)
Other 171  (848)  171 
Non-cash debt conversion expense  30,194 
Changes in assets and liabilities:  
Restricted cash 8,386  (2,104)  8,386 
Accounts receivable  (8,407) 4,352  6,603  (8,407)
Other assets 429  (231)
Deferred revenue 2,009 1,081   (3,039) 2,009 
Accounts payable 365  (1,850)  (2,106) 365 
Accrued subcontracting services   (3,612)
Advances for construction contract  (4,863)  (848)   (4,863)
Customer deposits   (3,106)
Other liabilities 275 934 
Other assets and liabilities 194 704 
          
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 4,972  (8,598)
Net cash provided by operating activities 4,437 4,972 
          
Cash flows from investing activities  
Purchases of property, equipment and leasehold improvements  (1,427)  (158)  (1,829)  (1,427)
          
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,427)  (158)  (1,829)  (1,427)
          
Cash flows from financing activities  
State of Texas Funding 900  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 17 746  114 17 
Payment of junior notes not participating in exchange   (2,867)
Senior convertible note repurchase  (1,085)     (1,085)
Term loan (payment) and proceeds  (267) 3,793 
Purchase of Treasury Stock  (120)  
Term loan payment  (267)  (267)
Purchase of treasury stock   (120)
          
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (1,455) 1,672 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 747  (1,455)
          
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 2,090  (7,084) 3,355 2,090 
          
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 2,640 9,724  4,730 2,640 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $4,730 $2,640  $8,085 $4,730 
          
  
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information  
Cash paid for interest $569 $638  $469 $569 
Cash paid for income taxes $ $212  $ $ 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

2729 


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1)
(1) Description of the Company and Operating Environment
Astrotech Corporation (Nasdaq: ASTC) (“Astrotech”,Astrotech,” “the Company”, “we”,Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is one of the first independenta commercial aerospace company that provides spacecraft payload processing and government services, designs and manufactures space businesses in the U.S.hardware, and remains a strong entrepreneurial leader in the aerospace industry. Since its incorporation in Washington in 1984, the Company has been a leader in the commercialdevelops space industry in preparing and sending satellites, cargo and science into space.technologies for use on Earth.
Astrotech has experience supporting both manned and unmanned missions to space with product and service support including space hardware design and manufacturing, research and logistics expertise, engineering and support services, and payload processing and integration. Through new business initiatives such as 1st1st Detect and Astrogenetix, and AirWard, Astrotech continues to paveis paving the way in the commercialization of space by translating space-based technology into terrestrial applications.
Our Business Units
Our Company is currently comprised of two primary business units, which provide the following products and services to the government and commercial markets. Our business units include:
Astrotech Space Operations Inc.(“ASO”) ASO is the leading commercial supplier of satellite launch processing services in the United States. ASO provides processing support for government and commercial customers withfor their complex communication, Earthearth observation and deep space satellites. ASO’s spacecraft processing facilities are among the elite in the industry, with more than 300,000150,000 square feet of clean room space that can support the largest, five-meter class satellites. ASO has provided launch processing support for government and commercial customers for nearly a quarter century, successfully processing more than 260280 spacecraft. ASO’s exclusive, turn-key approach to the total satellite life cycle leverages the Company’s legacy in ground processing operations, and engineering and support services. By offering the satellite customer mission design and planning, ground and launch operations, and mission operations and end-user enhancement, ASO ensures End-to-End Mission Assurance for its customers. Additionally ASO has engineering services with capabilities focused on mission design and planning, assisting satellite owners in the conceptualization of a mission through the build-out of the hardware. This includes assistance with mission design, regulatory planning, preliminary engineering and more detailed systems, mechanical, software, electrical, and optical engineering services.
OtherSpacetech Our Otherother business unit is an incubator envisionedintended to commercializedevelop space-industry technologies into real-worldcommercial applications to be sold to consumers and industry. The Other business unitSpacetech has developed three business initiatives to date; 1stdate: 1st Detect Corporation (“1st Detect”), Astrogenetix, Inc. (“Astrogenetix”) and AirWard. 1st DetectAirWard Corporation (“Airward”). 1st Detect’s business began under a Space Act Agreement with NASAthe National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) for a chemical detection unit to be used on the ISS. 1stInternational Space Station. 1st Detect engineers have developed a Miniature Chemical Detector, a breakthrough device in thebased on mass spectrometer marketspectrometry, that fillswe believe will fill a niche by being highly accurate, lightweight, battery-powered, durable and inexpensive. Astrogenetix Incorporated is the first commerciala biotechnology company created to use the unique environment of space to develop novel therapeutic products. A natural extension of the many years of experience preparing, launching, and operating over 1,500 science payloads in space, Astrogenetix is in the process of developing products from microgravity discoveries. AirWard Corporation has designed and manufactured shipping containers to transport oxygen bottles and oxygen generators for commercial aircraftaircraft. Further investment in Airward was suspended in February, 2010, as a solution to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s mandate stipulating that U.S. airlines must adhere to stringent containment requirements to protect these potentially volatile payloads from flame, heat and impact during flight.initiative has not yielded the anticipated return for shareholders.
The Company’s significant legal entity for ASO isentities include Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. The primary legal entities for our Other business unit include, 1st Detect Corporation Astrogenetix Corporation, Airward Corporation, and Spacehab Government Services,Astrogenetix, Inc. Additional discussion on Astrotech’s business can be found in Items 1-7 and Exhibit 21 of this Form 10-K.

 

2830 


Liquidity
As of June 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.1 million and our working capital was approximately $2.6 million, including $0.5 million of cash in 1st Detect available only to fund development of the Miniature Chemical Detector (see Note 13). As of June 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.7 million and our working capital was approximately $8.4 million. As of June 30, 2008 we had cash and restricted cash-on-hand of $11.0 million and our working capital was approximately $0.5 million. In fiscal year 2008, cash was designated as restricted by the Board of Directors for use in the construction of a US Government facility; however the Board of Directors has deemed this self-imposed classification no longer necessary due to a majority of the construction for the facility at VAFB being complete in fiscal year 2009.
In February 2008 (see Note 5), we consummated a financing facility with a commercial bank. This facility provides for a three year $4.0 million term loan, payable in monthly installments of principal and interest and a $2.0 million revolving credit facility. The term loan is secured by the assets of ASO and the revolving credit facility is secured by ASO’s accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2009,2010, we have no outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility.
At June 30, 2010, Astrotech had $5.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes outstanding which mature on October 15, 2010, and pay interest on April 15 and October 15 annually (see Note 5). The $5.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes and the $3.4 million term loan are due within the next fiscal year and therefore the classification has changed from long-term debt to current debt. The Company made principal payments on the term loan of $0.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2010. Interest is paid bi-annually on the Senior Convertible Notes.
The Company’s debt repayments are due as follows (in thousands):
                         
  Balance  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year  Fiscal Year 
  6/30/2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015 
                         
Term Note $3,356  $3,356  $  $  $  $ 
                         
Senior Convertible Notes Payable — 5.5%  5,111   5,111             
                   
                         
  $8,467  $8,467  $  $  $  $ 
                   
We believe we have sufficient liquidity and backlog to fund ongoing operations for at least the next fiscal year. We expect to utilize existing cash and proceeds from operations to grow our core business offering in ASO and to support strategies for new business initiatives.
(2)
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Astrotech Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiaries that are required to be consolidated. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that directly affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts reported in previous periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Credit Risk
The Company maintains funds in bank accounts that, at times, may exceed the limit insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or “FDIC.” In October 2008, the FDIC increased its insurance to $250,000 per depositor, and to an unlimited amount for non-interest bearing accounts. The risk of loss attributable to these uninsured balances is mitigated by depositing funds in what we believe to be high credit quality financial institutions. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

31 


Revenue Recognition
Astrotech recognizes revenue employing several generally accepted revenue recognition methodologies across its business units. The methodology usedRevenue is derived primarily from contracts to deliver payload processing support and facilities to the U.S. Government and to commercial customers. Revenues under these contracts are recognized using the methods described below. Given the changing launch schedules of our customers, and the changing requirements of the customers in construction contracts, estimating future costs and revenues is a process requiring a high degree of judgment by our management. (See Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our financial results could be adversely affected if the estimates that we use in accounting for contracts are incorrect and need to be changed.) For our satellite payload processing, we base our estimate on historical experience and on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, including the negotiation of equitable adjustments to our fixed-price contracts due to launch delays. For construction contracts, costs to complete include, when appropriate, material, labor, subcontracting costs, lease costs, commissions, insurance, and depreciation. In the event of a change in total estimated contract cost or profit, the cumulative effect of such change is recorded in the period that the change in estimate occurs.
A Summary of Revenue Recognition Methods Follows:
Services/Products ProvidedContract TypeMethod of Revenue Recognition
Satellite Payload Processing Support & FacilitiesFirm Fixed Price — Mission SpecificRatably, over the occupancy period of a satellite within the facility from arrival through launch
Firm Fixed Price — Guaranteed Number of MissionsFor multi-year contract payments recognized ratably over the contract period
Facility Construction contractsFirm Fixed PricePercentage-of-completion based on costs incurred
Engineering ServicesCost Reimbursable Award/Fixed FeeReimbursable costs incurred plus award/fixed fee
Commercial ProductsSpecific Purchase Order BasedAt shipment
Under certain contracts, we make expenditures for specific enhancements and/or additions to our facilities where the customer agrees to pay a fixed fee to deliver the enhancement or addition. We account for such agreements as a reduction in the cost of such investments and recognize any excess of amounts collected above the expenditure as revenue. Revenue for ASO recognized under a building modification contract with a government agency was accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method based on contract type and the manner in which products and services are provided.
Revenue generated by Astrotech’s payload processing facilities is recognized ratablycosts incurred over the occupancy period of the satellite while in the Astrotech facilities. For the multi-year guaranteed-mission contract with Lockheed Martin, revenue is billed and recognized on a quarterly basis. The percentage-of-completion method is used for all contracts where incurred costs can be reasonably estimated and successful completion can be reasonably assured at inception. Revenue derived from cost-plus award fee contracts is recognized to the extent of reimbursable costs incurred plus award fee. Award fees, which provide earnings based on our contract performance as determined by NASA evaluations, are recorded when the amounts are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Changes in estimated costs to complete and provisions for contract losses are recognized in the period they become known. Revenue for shipments of commercial products is recognized at shipment, consistent with the criteria of SAB 104.agreement.

29


Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents amounts collected from customers for projects, products, or services expected to be provided at a future date. Deferred revenue is shown on the balance sheet as either a short-term or long-term liability, depending on when the service or product is expected to be provided.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes
We recognize income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forward. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

32 


Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share includes all Common Stockcommon stock options and other Common Stockcommon stock equivalents that potentially may be issued as a result of conversion privileges, including the convertible subordinated notes payable and convertible preferred stock (see Note 11)10).
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are comprised primarily of operating cash accounts, money market investments and certificates of deposits.
Accounts Receivable
The carrying value of the Company’s accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, represents their estimated net realizable value. We estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts based on type of customer, age of outstanding receivable, historical collection trends, and existing economic conditions. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that a specific receivable balance may be unrealizable, further consideration is given to the collectability of those balances, and the allowance is adjusted accordingly. Receivable balances deemed uncollectible are written off against the allowance.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents cash that is not readily available for general purpose cash needs. In fiscal year 2008, cash was designated by the Board of Directors as restricted for use in the construction of a U.S. Government facility; however the Board of Directors has deemed this self-imposed classification no longer necessary due to a majority of the construction for the facility at VAFB being complete in fiscal year 2009.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. All furniture, fixtures, and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which is generally five years. Our payload processing facilities are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from sixteen16 to forty40 years.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the building or the term of the lease. Repairs and maintenance are expensed when incurred.
As required by our customers, we purchase equipment or enhance our facilities to meet specific customer requirements. These enhancements or equipment purchases are compensated through our contract with the customer. The difference between the amount reimbursed and the cost of the enhancements is recognized as revenue.

30


Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent loan origination fees paid to the lender and related professional fees. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective loan agreements.
Investments in Affiliates
We use the equity method of accounting for our investments in, and earnings of, investees in which we exert significant influence. In accordance with the equity method of accounting, the carrying amount of such an investment is initially recorded at cost and is increased to reflect our share of the investor’s income and is reduced to reflect the Company’s share of the investor’s losses.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We account for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of the SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This Statement requiresreview long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets (see Note 19).assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

33 


Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” effective July 1, 2009. Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable, notes payable except for the Senior Convertible notes payable, as noted in Footnote 6, and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of these assets and liabilities, in the opinion of Company’s management, approximate their fair value.value, except for the Senior Convertible Notes Payable (See Note 6).
Share Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based awards to employees based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. The fair value of the stock options is estimated using expected dividend yields of the Company’s stock, the expected volatility of the stock, the expected length of time the options remain outstanding and risk-free interest rates. Changes in one or more of these factors may significantly affect the estimated fair value of the stock options. Additionally, the Company estimates the number of instruments for which the required service is expected to be rendered. The Company estimates forfeitures using historical forfeiture rates for previous grants of equity instruments. The fair value of awards that are expected to vest is recorded as an expense over the vesting period.
Recent Accounting PronouncementsNoncontrolling Interest
In September 2006,Noncontrolling interest accounting is applied for any entities where the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 108, “ConsideringCompany maintains less than 100% ownership. The Company clearly identifies the Effectsnoncontrolling interest in the balance sheets and income statements. We also disclose three measures of Prior-Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatementsnet income: net income, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, and net income attributable to Astrotech Corporation. Our operating cash flows in Current Year Financial Statements,”our consolidated statements of cash flows reflect net income, while our basic and diluted earnings per share calculations reflect net income attributable to Astrotech Corporation.
State of Texas Funding
The Company accounts for the State of Texas funding in its majority owned subsidiary 1st Detect as a contribution of capital and has reflected the disbursement in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet. While the award agreement includes both a common stock purchase right and a note payable to the State of Texas, the economic substance of the transaction is that the State of Texas has purchased shares of 1st Detect in exchange for the granted award.
The common stock purchase right gives the State of Texas the ability to purchase common stock in 1st Detect, at par value per share, at the earlier of: (1) the first Qualifying Financing Event or (2) eighteen months (See Note 13).
There are no cash payments due under the note unless there is an event of default, and the terms that allow for the note to be cancelled after the passage of a set amount of time. The purpose of the note is to provide interpretive guidance on howrecourse for the effectsState of Texas if 1st Detect fails to fulfill the purpose of the carry-over or reversalgrant, which is primarily to provide for economic development within the State of prior year misstatementsTexas. If an event of default should occur, the principal and accrued interest would be consideredreclassified from equity to notes payable in quantifying a current year misstatement. There have been two approaches commonly usedthe consolidated financial statements as amounts due to quantify such errors. Under one approach, the error is quantified asState of Texas. Management considers the amount by which the current year income statement is misstated. The other approach quantifies the error as the cumulative amount by which the current year balance sheet is misstated. The SEC staff believes that companies should quantify errors using both a balance sheet andlikelihood of an income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. The applicationevent of this interpretation did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006 the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” (“SFAS No. 157”) FAS 157 establishes a common definition for fair valuedefault to be applied to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. Statement No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.remote.

 

3134 


In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 requires all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Its intention is to eliminate the diversity in practice regarding the accounting for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests. SFAS No. 160 will apply to fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption(3) Accounts Receivable
As of SFAS No. 160 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). Under SFAS No. 141(R), the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value. SFAS No. 141(R) also requires transaction costs related to the business combination to be expensed as incurred. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133. It requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, which amend FASB Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. These FSPs are effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the FSPs is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events(FAS No. 165), which provides guidance to establish general standards of accounting for, and disclosures of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. FAS No. 165 is effective for interim or fiscal periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 165 on April 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. We have updated subsequent events through September 24, 2009, which is the date of this filing.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method described in FASB SFAS No. 128,Earnings per Share. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those years on a retrospective basis. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
On June 3, 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification”, or the Codification, as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, in the United States. The Codification will be effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Upon the effective date, the Codification will be the single source of authoritative accounting principles to be applied by all nongovernmental U.S. entities. All other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be non-authoritative. The Company does not expect the adoption of the Codification to have an impact on its financial position or results of operations.

32


In June 2009, the FASB issued the following new accounting standards:
FAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”, or FAS 166;
FAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”,or FAS 167; and
FAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”, or FAS 168.
FAS 166 prescribes the information that a reporting entity must provide in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Specifically, among other aspects, FAS 166 amends Statement of Financial Standard No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, or FAS 140, by removing the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from FAS 140 and removes the exception from applying FIN 46(R) to variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities. It also modifies the financial-components approach used in FAS 140. FAS 166 is effective for transfer of financial assets occurring on or after January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on its financial position or results of operations.
FAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003) — an interpretation of ARB No. 51”, or FIN 46(R), to require an enterprise to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. FAS 167 also amends FIN 46(R) to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. FAS 167 is effective for all variable interest entities and relationships with variable interest entities existing as of January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on its financial position or results of operations.
FAS 168 replaces FAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, to establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codificationas the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. FAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on its financial position or results of operations.

33


(3)
Accounts Receivable
At June 30, 20092010, and 2008,2009, accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
                
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
U.S. Government contracts:  
Billed $6,274 $757  $2,123 $6,274 
Unbilled 4,926 359  836 4,926 
     
      
Total U.S. Government contracts $11,200 $1,116  $2,959 $11,200 
          
  
Commercial contracts:  
Billed $254 $2,078  $1,926 $254 
Unbilled 825 678  791 825 
          
Total commercial contracts $1,079 $2,756  $2,717 $1,079 
          
  
Total accounts receivable $12,279 $3,872  $5,676 $12,279 
          
The Company anticipates collecting all unreserved receivables within one year. Unbilled accounts receivable represents revenue earned in excess of contracted billing milestones.
The accuracy and appropriateness of our direct and indirect costs and expenses under government contracts, and therefore, our accounts receivable recorded pursuant to such contracts, are subject to extensive regulation and audit by the U.S. Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) or by other appropriate agencies of the U.S. Government. Such agencies have the right to challenge our cost estimates or allocations with respect to any government contract. Additionally, a substantial portion of the payments to the Company under government contracts are provisional payments that are subject to potential adjustment upon audit by such agencies. In the opinion of management, any adjustments likely to result from inquiries or audits of its contracts would not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
(4)
(4) Property & Equipment
AtAs of June 30, 20092010, and 2008,2009, property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
        
         June 30, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
  
Flight Assets $49,210 $49,210  $49,210 $49,210 
Payload Processing Facilities 42,652 42,600  44,457 42,652 
Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment & Leasehold Improvements 18,810 18,244  19,611 18,810 
Capital Improvements in Progress 885 76  108 885 
          
Gross Property and Equipment
 111,557 110,130  113,386 111,557 
          
Accumulated Depreciation  (71,331)  (69,131)  (73,466)  (71,331)
          
Property and Equipment, net
 $40,226 $40,999  $39,920 $40,226 
          
Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment and patent costs for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $2.1 million and 2008 was $2.2 million, and $2.7 million respectively.
We have estimated the useful lives of our space flight assets, which is a component of property and equipment, through August 31, 2007, based on current available information published by NASA.

34


(5)
Long-term Debt
Revolving Loan Payable
OnIn February 6, 2008, we entered into a financing facility with a bank providing a $4.0 million term loan terminating February 2011 and a $2.0 million revolving credit facility terminating in February 2009. The term loan requires monthly payments of principal, plus interest at the rate of prime plus 1.75%, and the revolving credit facility incurs interest at the rate of prime plus 1.75%. Effective February 2009,2010, we renewed the $2.0 million revolving credit facility for an additional one-year period. The renewal changedperiod which included reducing the interest rate to prime plus 0.75%. The bank financing facilities are secured by the assets of ASO and require us to comply with designated covenants. TheAs of June 30, 2010, the balance of the $4.0 million term loan at June 30, 2009 was $3.6 million. As of June 30, 2009,$3.4 million and there was no balance outstanding on the $2.0 million revolving credit facility. The Company made principal payments on the term loan of $0.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2010. Interest is paid bi-annually on the Senior Convertible Notes.
Convertible Subordinated Notes Payable
AtAs of June 30, 2009,2010 Astrotech had $5.1 million of 5.5% Senior Convertible Notes outstanding which mature on October 15, 2010, and pay interest on April 15 and October 15 annually (see note 16).annually. Senior Convertible Notes are convertible into 66.67 shares of Astrotech common stock per $1,000 of par.

35 


The Company’s debt repayments$5.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes and the $3.4 million term loan are due as follows (in thousands):within the next fiscal year, and therefore, the classification has changed from long-term debt to current debt.
                         
  Balance                
  6/30/2009  FY10  FY11  FY12  FY13  FY14 
                         
Term Note $3,591  $267  $3,324  $  $  $ 
                         
Senior Convertible Notes Payable – 5.5%  5,111       5,111          
                   
                         
  $8,702  $267  $8,435  $  $  $ 
                   
In October 2008, the Company repurchased $1.8 million principal amount of its Senior Convertible Notes. See Note 15 for further information.
(6)
(6) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In general, fair values utilizes quoted prices in active (when available) markets for identical assets or liabilities. The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of certain of the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 20092010, and 20082009 (in thousands):
                                
 June 30, 2009 June 30, 2008  June 30, 2010 June 30, 2009 
 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair  Carrying Fair Carrying Fair 
 Amount Value Amount Value  Amount Value Amount Value 
  
Term loan payable $3,591 $3,591 $3,793 $3,793  $3,356 $3,356 $3,591 $3,591 
  
Senior convertible notes payable – 5.5% $5,111 $2,650 $6,861 $3,775 
Senior Convertible Notes Payable — 5.5% $5,111 $4,808 $5,111 $2,650 
The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based on the current rates offered for similar financial instruments. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair market value due to the relatively short duration of these instruments.

35


(7)
(7) Business Concentration
A substantial portion of our revenue has been generated under contracts with the U.S. Government. During the years ended June 30, 2010, and 2009, approximately 49% and 2008, approximately 65% and 84% of our revenues were generated under U.S. Government contracts, respectively. Of the accounts receivable balance as of June 30, 2009,2010, totaling $12.3$5.7 million, 91%52% of the balance is attributed to the USU.S. Government.
Program Integration and Control
In prior periods, we provided ISS Configuration Management support to NASA as a major subcontractor on the PI&C contract. ARES was the prime contractor for PI&C. The contract had a base period of performance of four years and nine months, plus two one-year options. This contract was terminated as of June 2008, by ARES, the prime contractor. See Note 21.
(8)
(8) Common Stock Incentive, Stock Purchase Plans and Other Compensation Plans
As of June 30, 2009, 2,656,6132010, 379,389 shares of Common Stock were reserved for future grants of stock incentive grants under the Company’s three stock incentive plans.
The 1994 Plan (“1994 Plan”)
Under the terms of the 1994 Plan, the number and price of the stock incentive awards granted to employees is determined by the Board of Directors and such grants vest, in most cases, incrementally over a period of four years and expire no more than ten years after the date of grant. The total number of shares that are available under this plan is 395,000. As of June 30, 20092010 there are 244,769no shares available for grant. Based on the Articles of the 1994 stock incentive plan, no awards shall be granted more than ten years after the effective date of the plan unless amended.
The Directors’ Stock Option Plan (“Director’s Plan”)
Each new non-employee director receives a one-time grant of an option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. In addition, effective as of the date of each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders, each non-employee director who is elected or continues as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company is awarded an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock. Options under the Director’s Plan vest after one year and expire seven years from the date of grant. The total number of options that are available under this plan is 50,000. Through June 30, 20092010, there are 23,50030,000 options available for grant.
Space Media, Inc. Stock Option Plan
During the year ended June 30, 2000, Space Media, Inc. (“SMI”), a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company, (“SMI”), adopted an option plan under which 1,500,000 shares of our Common Stock have been reserved for future grants. The operations of SMI have been discontinued. No options were issued or are outstanding under this plan.
2008 Stock Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”)
The 2008 Plan was created to promote growth of the Company by aligning the long-term financial success of the Company with the employees, consultants and directors. In the first and second quarters of fiscal 2010, the compensation committee of the Board of Directors granted 1,995,559 and 410,000 restricted shares, respectively, to directors, named executive officers and employees in recognition of the positive fiscal 2009 financial and operating performance. The shares were issued from the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, vest 33.33% a year over a three year period and expire upon the employee’s termination. As of June 30, 2009, 3,241,7082010, 5,622,267 stock options and restricted shares were granted, 471,656 shares have been cancelled and 2,388,344349,389 shares are available for future grant.

 

36


1st Detect
On January 19, 2010, an independent committee of the Board of Directors of 1st Detect, a subsidiary of the Company, approved a grant of 1,180 restricted stock shares and 1,820 stock purchase warrants to certain officers, directors and employees of 1st Detect. The awards vest 50% a year over a 2 year period. We recognized compensation expense of $0.1 million for restricted stock outstanding in 2010. The Company utilized the Black-Scholes methodology in determining the fair market value of the warrants of $0.3 million, of which $1,600 was recognized in 2010.
Astrogenetix
On January 19, 2010, an independent committee of the Board of Directors of Astrogenetix, a subsidiary of the Company, approved a grant of 1,550 restricted stock shares and 2,050 stock purchase warrants to certain officers, directors and employees of Astrogenetix. The awards vest 50% a year over a 2 year period. We recognized compensation expense of $0.1 million for restricted stock outstanding in 2010. The Company utilized the Black-Scholes methodology in determining the fair market value of the warrants of $0.2 million, of which $1,400 was recognized in 2010.
Stock Option Activity Summary
The following table summarizesCompany’s stock options underactivity for the Company’s stock incentive plans:
                         
  2008 Plan  1994 Plan  Directors’ Plan 
      Weighted      Weighted      Weighted 
      Average      Average      Average 
  Shares  Exercise  Shares  Exercise  Shares  Exercise 
  Outstanding  Price  Outstanding  Price  Outstanding  Price 
Outstanding at June 30, 2007          80,694   28.10   27,000   20.00 
Granted               1,000   4.40 
Exercised                    
Forfeited        (20,094)  20.56   (3,500)  40.00 
                   
Outstanding at June 30, 2008         60,600   30.58   24,500   16.50 
Granted  1,216,708   0.41                 
Exercised  (37,500)  0.45                 
Forfeited  (105,052)  0.45   (5,200)  14.14   (3,000)  14.20 
                   
Outstanding at June 30, 2009  1,074,156   0.41   55,400   32.13   21,500   16.82 
                   
                         
Options exercisable at:                        
                         
June 30, 2007        51,694   35.90   24,000   21.60 
June 30, 2008        49,800   34.21   23,500   17.01 
June 30, 2009  594,156   0.43   52,300   33.31   21,500   16.82 
                         
Weighted-average fair value (pursuant to FAS 123R) at date of grant of options issued during the fiscal year ended                        
                         
June 30, 2008              1,000   3.23 
June 30, 2009  1,216,708   0.25                 
                     
      Options            
      outstanding          Options 
      Weighted-          exercisable 
      Average  Weighted-      Weighted- 
      Remaining  Average      Average 
  Number  Contractual  Exercise  Number  Exercise 
Range of exercise prices Outstanding  Life (years)  Price  Exercisable  Price 
$0.30 – 0.45  1,074,156   5.0   0.41   594,156   0.44 
$4.40 – 11.50  25,600   3.9   8.85   23,200   8.58 
$14.30 – 26.00  19,600   4.1   20.64   18,900   20.88 
$34.38 – 48.75  11,700   1.0   41.47   11,700   41.47 
$51.25 – 51.25  20,000   0.0   51.25   20,000   51.25 
                
$0.30 – 51.25  1,151,056   4.9  $2.24   667,956  $3.54 
                

37


A summary of our stock option activity as oftwelve months ended June 30, 2009, and changes during fiscal year 2009, are presented in the following table:2010 was as follows:
                 
          Weighted-    
      Weighted-  Average    
      Average  Remaining  Aggregate 
  Shares Under  Exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  Fixed Options  Price  Term  Value 
                 
Outstanding at June 30, 2008  85,100   26.53   3.6  $ 
             
Granted  1,216,708   0.41      $899,846 
Exercised  (37,500)  0.45     $ 
Forfeited/Expired  (113,252)  1.44     $ 
             
Outstanding at June 30, 2009  1,151,056   2.23   4.9  $ 
             
Exercisable  667,956   3.53   2.3  $ 
Vested at June 30, 2009  667,956   3.53   2.3  $ 
             
         
  Shares  Weighted Average 
  (in thousands)  Exercise Price 
Outstanding at June 30, 2009  1,125  $2.27 
       
Granted      
Exercised  (271) 0.43 
Cancelled or expired  (109) 12.54 
       
Outstanding at June 30, 2010  745  $1.45 
       
The weighted-average grant-dateaggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable at June 30, 2010 was $0.4 million as the fair value of options granted during fiscal year 2009 was $0.41 per share. The intrinsic value forthe Company’s common stock options is defined asmore than the difference between the current market value and the grant price.exercise prices of these options.
                     
      Options            
      outstanding          Options 
      Weighted-          exercisable 
      Average  Weighted-      Weighted- 
      Remaining  Average      Average 
  Number  Contractual  Exercise  Number  Exercise 
Range of exercise prices Outstanding  Life (years)  Price  Exercisable  Price 
$0.30 – 0.45  705,741   4.4   0.40   520,741   0.41 
$4.40 – 11.50  17,600   3.4   9.07   16,400   8.89 
$14.30 – 26.00  14,100   2.6   21.27   14,100   21.27 
$34.38 – 48.75  8,200   0.3   41.57   8,200   41.57 
                
$0.30 – 48.75  745,641   4.3  $1.45   559,441  $1.79 
Compensation costs recognized related to vested stock option awards during the year ended June 30, 2010, and 2009 and 2008 was $0.2$0.1 million and $0.1$0.2 million, respectively. At June 30, 2009,2010, there was $0.23$0.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.92.24 years. There were no options that were exercised during

37 


Restricted Stock
At June 30, 2010, and 2009, there was $2.3 million and $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.1 years.
The Company’s restricted stock activity for the yeartwelve months ended June 30, 2008.2010, was as follows:
         
      Weighted 
      Average 
  Shares  Grant-Date 
  (in thousands)  Fair Value 
Non-vested at June 30, 2009  243  $0.52 
       
Granted  2,406  1.27 
Vested  (44)  0.50 
Cancelled or expired  (269) 1.63 
       
Non-vested at June 30, 2010  2,336  $1.17 
       
Restricted Stock 1st Detect
At June 30, 2010, there was $0.5 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock and warrants, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
1st Detect restricted stock activity for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, was as follows:
         
      Weighted 
      Average 
      Grant-Date 
  Shares  Fair Value 
Non-vested at June 30, 2009    $ 
       
Granted  1,180  212.00 
Vested      
Cancelled or expired     
       
Non-vested at June 30, 2010  1,180  $212.00 
       
Restricted Stock Astrogenetix
At June 30, 2010, there was $0.4 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock and warrants, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
Astrogenetix restricted stock activity for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, was as follows:
Other Stock Based Incentive Awards
2007 performance shares – We issued 239,900 performance shares in December 2007, that vest in February 2011, subject to certain events or upon designation by the Compensation Committee. Termination of employment for any cause is an event of forfeiture. We valued the 2007 performance shares granted at the close of business on the date of grant, and recognize expense and accrue an incentive compensation liability, pro rata over the vesting period. Subsequently, 160,500 shares were forfeited. An expense was incurred in the amount of $32,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009.
Restricted stock grants – In March 2008 the Board of Directors granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock to each non-employee director of the Company. In February 2009, the Board of Directors granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock to a newly elected director and terminated 25,000 shares of unvested restricted stock held by a director who left the Board of Directors prior to the vesting date. The Restricted Stock vests annually over a period of four years and unvested shares are forfeited if the Director resigns prior to the vesting date. In July 2008, the Board of Directors granted a total of 400,000 shares of restricted stock to its named executive officers. The restricted stock vests 50% in January 2009, 25% in January 2010, and 25% in January 2011. In the year ended June 30, 2009, we recognized compensation and director fee expense of $0.2 million for restricted stock grants.
         
      Weighted 
      Average 
      Grant-Date 
  Shares  Fair Value 
Non-vested at June 30, 2009    $ 
       
Granted  1,950  167.00 
Vested      
Cancelled or expired  (400) 167.00 
       
Non-vested at June 30, 2010  1,550  $167.00 
       

 

38


Other equity awards — In July 2008, the Board of Directors granted an award of 1,100,000 shares of unrestricted common stock to Mr. Thomas B. Pickens, III, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, 200,000 shares of unrestricted common stock to Mr. Barry A. Williamson, then a director, and 150,000 shares of unrestricted common stock to Mr. Mark E. Adams, a director. Such grants of unrestricted common stock were made from the 2008 Plan and compensation expense of $0.7 million was recognized in fiscal year 2009.
Special2007 performance shares — We issued 62,200239,900 performance shares in December 2007 that were toout of the 1994 Plan, which vest in January, 2009,February 2011, subject to certain events or upon designation by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has subsequently determined thatTermination of employment for any cause is an event of forfeiture. We valued the requirements for vesting were not met as of January 2009. The Company has therefore terminated the outstanding2007 performance shares granted at the close of business on the date of grant, and reflected a recoveryrecognize expense and accrue an incentive compensation liability, pro rata over the vesting period. Subsequent to issuance 179,000 shares were forfeited. An expense was incurred in the amount of $14,000 previously expensed costs.
$0.02 million for the year ended June 30, 2010.
Fair Value of Stock Based Compensation
The Company calculated the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
                
         Astrotech Spacetech 
 Year ended June 30,  Year ended June 30, Year ended June 30, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 2010 2009 
Expected Dividend Yield  0%  0%  %  0%  0%  %
Expected Volatility 1.15 1.14   1.15 1.43  
Risk-Free Interest Rates  2.7%  3.58%  %  2.7%  0.9%  %
Expected Option Life (in years) 3.55 6.25   3.55 2.00  
Because ofDue to differences in option terms and historical exercise patterns among the plans, we have segregated option awards into two homogenous groups for the purpose of determining fair values for its options. Valuation assumptions are determined separately for the two groups, which represent, respectively, the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan and the Director’s Stock Option Plan. No options have been issued as ofduring the year ended June 30, 20092010, under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. The assumptions are as follows:
  We estimated volatility using our historical share price performance over the last ten years. Management believes the historical estimated volatility is materially indicative of expectations about expected future volatility.
 
  We use the simplified method outlined in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 to estimate expected lives for options granted.
 
  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option.
 
  The expected dividend yield is based on our current dividend yield and the best estimate of projected dividend yield for future periods within the expected life of the option.
Cash Based Long Term Incentive Awards
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors adopted and implemented a Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan during the second quarter of fiscal year 2008. The Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan makespays cash incentive awards to employees upon the successful completion of certain events and passage of time as established by the Compensation Committee. In the year ended June 30, 2008, the Compensation Committee awarded Long-Term Cash Incentive Units valued at $0.3 million to employees. These units vest on50% in August 2010 and 50% in February 15, 2011 and are subject to material risk of forfeiture. Through June 30, 2009,For fiscal year 2010, expense recognized for this plan totaled $33,000,$0.01 million, cash paid to terminated employees was $15,000,$0.02 million, and the deferred liability was $0.1 million.

39 


Securities Repurchase Program
In March 2009, the Company repurchased 300,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share, pursuant to the securities repurchase program. As of June 30, 2009, we had repurchased 311,660 share of Common Stock at a cost of $0.2 million, which represents an average cost of $0.76 per share, and $1.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes Payable (See Note 5). As a result, the Company is authorized to repurchase an additional $5.7 million of securities under this program.
Common Stock or Senior Convertible Notes Payable repurchases under the Company’s securities repurchase program may be made from time-to-time, in the open market, through block trades or otherwise in accordance with applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Depending on market conditions and other factors, these purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time or from time-to-time without prior notice. Additionally, the timing of such transactions will depend on other corporate strategies and will be at the discretion of the management of the Company.
In March 2009, the Company repurchased 300,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share, pursuant to the securities repurchase program. As of June 30, 2009, we had repurchased 311,660 share of Common Stock at a cost of $0.2 million, which represents an average cost of $0.76 per share, and $1.1 million of Senior Convertible Notes payable (See Note 14). As a result, the Company is authorized to repurchase an additional $5.7 million of securities under this program.
(9)
(9) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for taxes under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under SFAS 109, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted rates expected to be in effect during the year in which the differences reverse.

39


The components of income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations are as follows (in thousands):
                
 Year Ended June 30,  Year Ended June 30, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
Current: 
Current 
Federal $(202) $286  $ $(202)
State and local  (308) 389  22  (308)
Foreign      
          
  (510) 675  $22 $(510)
          
Deferred: 
 
Deferred 
Federal      
State and local      
Foreign      
          
  $22 $(510
Income tax expense (benefit) $(510) $675 
          

40 


A reconciliation of the reported income tax expense to the amount that would result by applying the U.S. federalFederal statutory rate to the income (loss) before income taxes to the actual amount of income tax expense (benefit) recognized follows (in thousands):
         
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008 
Expected expense (benefit) $1,527  $(12,020)
Change in valuation allowance  7,426   (9,988)
Over-accrual of Federal Tax in prior year  (668)  19 
Adjustment to deferred tax assets  (8,831)  3,636 
Debt Exchange  (210)  17,746 
Bond Interest     374 
Expiration of general business credits     200 
Other, stock compensation items  246   708 
       
Total $(510) $675 
       
         
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2010  2009 
 
Expected expense (benefit) $(104) $1,433 
Alternative minimum tax and state tax expense  22   123 
Debt exchange     (210)
Adjustment from prior year tax filings     (633)
Change in valuation allowance  (186)  (1,482)
Stock compensation  207   126 
Other permanent items  83   133 
       
Total
 $22  $(510)
       
         
The Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 consist of the following (in thousands): 
         
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforwards $12,410  $12,500 
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards  689   687 
Accrued expenses and other timing  85   113 
       
Total gross deferred tax assets $13,184  $13,300 
Less — valuation allowance  (12,789)  (12,975)
       
Net deferred tax assets $395  $325 
       
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation  (395)  (325)
       
Total gross deferred tax liabilities $(395) $(325)
       
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
 $  $ 
       
The Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 consist of the following (in thousands):
         
  2009  2008 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforwards $12,500  $4,507 
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards  687   926 
Accrued expenses  69   163 
Deferred gain  44   73 
Other     9 
       
Total gross deferred tax assets  13,300   5,678 
Less – valuation allowance  (12,975)  (5,549)
       
Net deferred tax assets  325   129 
       
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation  (325)  (91)
Other     (38)
       
Total gross deferred tax liabilities  (325)  (129)
       
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $  $ 
       

40


The valuation allowance increaseddecreased by approximately $7.4$0.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2009.2010. The valuation allowance increaseddecreased by approximately $10.0$1.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2008.2009.
At June 30, 2009,2010, the Company had accumulated net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $12.5$36.5 million for Federal income tax purposes which($12.4 million, tax effected) that are available to offset future regular taxable income. These net operating loss carryforwards expire between the years 20122021 and 2026. Utilization of these net operating losses is subject to limitationslimited due to the changes in stock ownership of the Company associated with the October 2007 Exchange Offer.Offer; as such, the benefit from these losses may not be realized.
The Company has $0.7 million of alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards available to offset future regular tax liabilities.
In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will be utilized.utilized to offset future tax liabilities. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As of June 30, 2009,2010, the Company provided a full valuation allowance of approximately $13.0$12.8 million against its net deferred tax assets.

41 


(10)
(10) Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and the if-converted method. Dilutive potential common shares include outstanding stock options, convertible debt, and shared-based awards. Reconciliation and the components of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share are as follows (in thousands, except per share data)thousands):
         
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2009  2008 
 
Numerator:
        
Net income (loss), basic $4,725  $(36,028)
Dilutive convertible debt       
Dilutive share based payments  21     
Dilutive deemed dividend on preferred shares     (3,344)
       
Net income (loss), diluted  4,746  $(36,028)
       
         
Denominator:
        
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share – weighted average common stock outstanding  16,365   9,254 
Dilutive common stock equivalents – common stock options and share-based awards  539    
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share weighted average common stock outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents  16,904   9,254 
       
         
Basic net income (loss) per share $0.29  $(4.26)
       
Diluted net income (loss) per share $0.28  $(4.26)
       
         
  Year Ended June 30, 
  2010  2009 
         
Numerator:
        
Net income basic $260  $4,725 
Dilutive share based payments     21 
       
Net income diluted $260  $4,746 
       
         
Denominator:
        
Denominator for basic net income per share — weighted average common stock outstanding  16,567   16,365 
Dilutive common stock equivalents — common stock options and share-based awards  1,716   539 
Denominator for diluted net income per share weighted average common stock outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents  18,283   16,904 
       
         
Basic net income per share $0.02  $0.29 
       
Diluted net income per share $0.01  $0.28 
       

41


The Senior Convertible Subordinated Notes Payable outstanding as of June 30, 20092010, and June 30, 2008,2009, which are convertible into 341,000 and 458,000 shares of common stock, respectively, at $15.00 per share, have not been included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share for the twelve months ended June 30, 20092010, and June 30, 2008,2009, as the impact to net income (loss) per share is anti-dilutive.
Options to purchase 39,900 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $4.40 to $48.75 per share outstanding for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, were not included in diluted net income per share, as the impact to net income per share is anti-dilutive. Options to purchase 467,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.30 to $51.25 per share outstanding for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, were not included in diluted net income per share, as the impact to net income per share is anti-dilutive.
(11)
(11) Employee Benefit Plans
We have a defined contribution retirement plan, which covers substantially all employees and officers. For the years ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, we have contributed the required match of $0.3 million and $0.6$0.3 million, respectively, to the plan. We have the right, but not an obligation, to make additional contributions to the plan in future years at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. We have not made any additional contributions for the years ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008.2009.

42


(12)
Commitments and Contingents
Construction Contract Contingency
In August 2007 we entered into a $14.0 million modification to our existing VAFB construction contract. The modification requires us to complete the construction on the redesigned facility by September 30, 2009. The modification contains penalties of up to $3.0 million if we do not meet the contracted completion date. The construction was substantially complete in August 2009(12) Commitments and management believes the enforcement of penalties to be unlikely. See Note 22.Contingencies
Leases
The Company is obligated under noncancelable operating leases for equipment, office space, storage space, and the land for a payload processing facility, and certain flight assets. Future minimum payments under these noncancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):.
        
 Operating  Operating 
Year ending June 30, Leases  Leases 
  
2010 $857 
2011 532  616 
2012 248  256 
2013 9  13 
2014    
2015 and thereafter  
2015  
2016 and thereafter  
      
Subtotal $1,646  $885 
      
Rent expense for the years ended June 30, 20092010 and 20082009 was approximately $0.9 million and $1.7$0.9 million, respectively. For fiscal year 20092010, the Company received sublease payments of $0.3 million.
Construction Contract Contingency
In May 2005,August 2007 we entered into a $14.0 million modification to our existing VAFB construction contract. The modification required us to complete the construction on the facility by September 30, 2009. The modification contained penalties of up to $3.0 million if we did not meet the contracted completion date. The construction was complete in September 2009 and the Company completeddid not incur a purchasepenalty.
State of Texas Funding
In March 2010, the Texas Emerging Technology Fund awarded 1st Detect $1.8 million for the development and sale lease-backmarketing of the payload processing facilityMiniature Chemical Detector, a portable mass spectrometer designed to serve the security, healthcare and industrial markets. (See Note 13). As of June 30, 2010, 1st Detect has received the first of two $0.9 million disbursements. The disbursed amount of $0.9 million represents a contingency through March 2020, the date of cancellation. If an event of default should occur, the principal and accrued interest would be reclassified from equity to notes payable in Port Canaveral, Floridathe consolidated financial statements as amounts due to the State of Texas. Management considers the likelihood of an event of default to be remote.
Employment Contracts
The Company has entered into employment contracts with certain of its key executives. Generally, certain amounts may become payable in the event the Company terminates the executives’ employment (See Part III, Item 11).
(13) State of Texas Funding
In March 2010, the Texas Emerging Technology Fund awarded 1st Detect $1.8 million for $4.8 million, resulting in net cashthe development and marketing of $3.8 millionthe Miniature Chemical Detector, a portable mass spectrometer designed to serve the security, healthcare and industrial markets. In exchange for the award, 1st Detect granted a common stock purchase right and a gainnote payable to the State of $0.5Texas. As of June 30, 2010, 1st Detect has received the first of two $0.9 million which we carried as a deferred gain and are amortizing overdisbursements. The proceeds from the initial 68 month termaward can only be used to fund development of the lease-back. Miniature Chemical Detector at 1st Detect, not for repaying existing debt or for use in other Company subsidiaries.
The common stock purchase right is exercisable at the first “Qualifying Financing Event”, which is essentially a change in control or third party equity investment in 1st Detect. The number of shares available to the State of Texas, at the price of par value, is calculated as the total disbursements (numerator) divided by the stock price established in the Qualifying Financing Event (denominator). If the first Qualifying Financing Event does not occur within eighteen months of the deferred gain at June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.agreement effective date, the number of shares available for purchase will equal the total disbursements (numerator) divided by $100 (denominator).

 

4243


(13)
Segment Information
The note equals the disbursements to 1st Detect to date, accrues interest at 8% per year and cancels automatically at the earlier of (1) selling substantially all of the assets of 1st Detect, (2) selling more than 50% of common stock of 1st Detect or (3) in March 2020. No payments of interest or principal are due on the note unless there is a default, which would occur if 1st Detect moves its operations or headquarters outside of Texas at any time before March 2020. 1st Detect has the option to pay back the principal plus accrued interest by September 30, 2011, but repayment does not cancel the State of Texas’ common stock purchase right.
The accounting policiesManagement considers the likelihood of our businesses arevoluntarily repaying the samenote or of a default event as those describedremote. As such, the first $0.9 million installment was accounted for as a contribution to equity in Note 2: Summarythe period ended June 30, 2010.
(14) Segment Information
Selected financial data for the year ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 of Significant Accounting Policies. Information about the Company’s segments is as follows (in thousands):
Year ended June 30, 2009:2010:
                                        
 Income (loss) Net Fixed Depreciation & Total  Income (loss) Net Fixed Depreciation & Total 
 Revenue before income taxes Assets Amortization Assets  Revenue before income taxes Assets Amortization Assets 
ASO $31,154 $9,507 $39,815 $2,089 $52,595  $27,979 $6,332 $39,670 $2,025 $48,670 
Other 831  (5,292) 411 120 6,324 
Spacetech   (6,638) 250 110 6,233 
                      
Total $27,979 $(306) $39,920 $2,135 $54,903 
            
 $31,985 $4,215 $40,226 $2,209 $58,919 
           
Year ended June 30, 2008:2009:
                                        
 Income (loss) Net Fixed Depreciation & Total  Income (loss) Net Fixed Depreciation & Total 
 Revenue before income taxes Assets Amortization Assets  Revenue before income taxes Assets Amortization Assets 
ASO $15,810 $1,963 $40,602 $2,121 $51,246  $31,856 $7,345 $40,051 $2,073 $52,595 
Other 9,734  (37,316) 397 547 6,965 
Spacetech 129  (3,130) 175 136 6,324 
                      
Total $31,985 $4,215 $40,226 $2,209 $58,919 
            
 $25,544 $(35,353) $40,999 $2,668 $58,211 
           
(14)(15) Strategic Financial and Business Alternatives
In September 2009, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had engaged investment banking firm Lazard Ltd. to advise the Company in exploring strategic financial and business alternatives to enhance shareholder value. In July 2010, the Company announced that it had concluded its engagement with Lazard Middle Market following a review of strategic alternatives by its Board of Directors.
(16) Board of Director Resignation
On June 18, 2010, General (Ret.) Lance W. Lord resigned from the Board of Directors of Astrotech and as the Chief Executive Officer of Astrotech Space Operations. The vacancy on the Board of Directors created by General Lord’s resignation is not expected to be filled until the next annual meeting. The role of Chief Executive Officer, Astrotech Space Operations, will remain open pending a review of internal and external candidates.

44


On September 30, 2009, R. Scott Nieboer resigned from the Astrotech Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Mr. Nieboer’s decision to resign is not a result of a disagreement with the Company related to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. In October 2009, the Board of Directors appointed current director Sha-Chelle Manning to fill the vacancy on the Audit Committee.
(17) Related Party Transactions
The Company engaged in certain transactions with directors, executive officers, shareholders, and certain former officers during fiscal years 20092010 and 2008.2009. Following is a description of these transactions:
Senior Convertible Note Repurchase
In October 2008, the Company purchased $1.8 million principal amount of its outstanding 5.5% Senior Convertible notes. CompanyNotes. At the time, company Director Mr. R. Scott Nieboer was a beneficial owner of the repurchased securities. The Company paid $1.1 million for these securities and has recognized a gain of $0.7 million on the transaction in fiscal year 2009.
Astrium
Astrium, an owner of Common Stock, provides unpressurized payload and integration efforts to the Company on a fixed price basis in addition to providing engineering services as required. Astrium’s payload and integration services resulted in no cost of revenue for the year ended June 30, 2009 and $1.0 million for the year ended June 20, 2008.
Executive Credit Cards
Certain named executive officers of the Company have company paid credit cards for ordinary business expenses. Although the Company pays the amounts on the credit cards, the executive officer is obligated to substantiate the charges and reimburse the Company for any non-business related charges. As of June 30, 2009 the Company had no outstanding receivables on such executive credit cards.
Directors Compensation
Our independent directors are paid an annual cash retainer fee upon their appointment or annual re-election to the Board of Directors and are granted annual equity based compensation grants. We amortize the expense of these annual awards over the period between annual meetings of shareholders. Meeting fees, expenses, and other costs are expensed as incurred. The director fees expensed in 2010 and 2009 and 2008 were $0.3$0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

43


James D. Royston
Effective December 2008, the Company entered into a seven month auto-renewable lease agreement with Mr. Royston for a house located in Melbourne Florida to be used by employees of the Company while conducting business on behalf of the Company. The lease provides for monthly rental payments of $2,900 plus utilities and consumables to be paid by the Company. The lease was terminated by the Company as of September 2009.
(15)
Induced Conversion of Convertible Securities and Reverse Stock Split
On October 5, 2007, we announced the successful closing of our offer to exchange (the “Exchange Offer”) any and all of our outstanding 8.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007 (the “Junior Notes”) and any and all of our outstanding 5.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2010 (the “Senior Notes”). As a result of the closing of the Exchange Offer, for the approximately $7.4 million in principal amount of Junior Notes tendered, the holders received approximately 550,000 shares of common stock and 9,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on a pre-reverse split basis. Following the closing of the Exchange Offer, approximately $2.9 million of Junior Notes remained outstanding pursuant to the original terms of the indenture governing the Junior Notes. On October 15, 2007, we redeemed the outstanding Junior Notes, including accrued interest for cash. In addition, for the approximately $46.1 million in principal amount of outstanding Senior Notes tendered, the holders received approximately 30.7 million shares of common stock and 46,083 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on a pre-reverse split basis. Following the closing of the Exchange Offer, approximately $6.9 million of Senior Notes remained outstanding pursuant to an indenture governing the Senior Notes that was amended through the elimination of substantially all of the indenture’s restrictive covenants.
In addition, as a result of the closing of the Restructuring and Exchange Agreement, effective as of August 31, 2007, among the Company and certain holders of Junior Notes and Senior Notes, the Company issued to Astrium 1,333,000 shares of common stock and 7,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for Astrium’s existing 1,333,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock on a pre-reverse split basis.
As a consequence of the Exchange Offer, we recognized non-cash debt conversion expense of $30.2 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2008, and we increased our common stock by $98.4 million.
In November 2007, we converted the 62,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock into 89.9 million shares of common stock on a pre-reverse split basis and affected a 1 for 10 reverse stock split, reducing our issued and outstanding common stock to 13.6 million shares. All share amounts have been stated to reflect this split for all periods presented.
(16)
Sales of Equity Securities
2010.
Commitment Consideration Paid in Stock
On February 11, 2008, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with certain investors for the purchase of 55,000 shares of the Company’s Series D convertible preferred stock for a total price of $5.5 million. Consummation of the transaction was contingent upon NASA awarding us a funded Space Act Agreement under the COTS Program and shareholder approval of the transaction. As consideration for investor commitment to this transaction, the Company issued 150,150 shares of common stock upon entering into the transaction. The Stock Purchase Agreement relied upon the exception from registration pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. The Company believes that such issuance of securities qualifies for an exemption under Rule 506 because there are no more than 35 purchasers of securities and each Investor represents to the Company under the Stock Purchase Agreement at the time of execution and closing that it is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D.
The Company was not awarded a funded Space Act Agreement under the COTS Program and, except for the 150,150 shares issued, the offering was terminated.

44


Private Placement of Common Stock
On May 22, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors, under which the investors agreed to subscribe for and purchase 1,330,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $0.6 million. Consummation of the transaction under the Securities Purchase Agreement was contingent upon certain customary conditions precedent to each party’s obligation to close. $47,000 for subscribed common stock related to the Private Placement, which was received in July, is reflected as issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008.
The 1,330,000 shares of common stock issued on June 5, 2008, under the Securities Purchase Agreement were sold in reliance on the exemption from registration pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. The Company believes that such issuance of securities qualifies for an exemption under Rule 506, because there are no more than 35 purchasers of securities and each Investor represents to the Company under the Securities Purchase Agreement at the time of execution and closing that it is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D.
(17)
(18) Adverse Event
On January 30, 2007, Sea Launch experienced a launch failure resulting in the loss of a satellite and damage to the floating launch platform. A full inspection, evaluation, and repair operations of the damage incurredoccurred and Sea Launch returned to operations in October 2007. We were paid under our contract with Sea Launch upon launch of each mission; therefore, revenues were delayed until the resumption of normal operations. As a result of the launch failure, the Company lost revenue on at least three launch missions either through cancellation or schedule delay. We submitted a claim under our business interruption insurance for $750,000, the limit of our policy.
After negotiation with our Insurance Company, Affiliated FM, we received a letter in February 2009 denying coverage. In June 2009, Sea Launch filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. We see no further method of recourse and now consider the matter closed.
In June 2009, Sea Launch filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
(18)
Agreement to Termination of ICC and VCC Leases
On August 28, 2007, the Company and Astrium mutually agreed to terminate the lease agreement dated as of February 28, 2001 in regards to the Company’s lease of the ICC assets from Astrium. Also, we mutually agreed to terminate the lease agreement dated as of July 3, 2001 in regards to the Company’s lease of the VCC assets from Astrium. The ICC and VCC assets are specifically designed cargo carrying equipment used periodically in the U.S. Space Shuttle. In order to terminate these two leases, we mutually agreed that the Company reimburse Astrium $1.4 million for the period March 1, 2007 through August 31, 2007 for the ICC and VCC assets and incur no financial obligations for either the ICC or VCC after August 31, 2007.
(19)
(19) NASDAQ Listing Qualifications
On April 7, 2008, we received a NASDAQ Staff Determination letter indicating that we failed to comply with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(4), which requires that we maintain a $1.00 bid price, and our securities were, therefore, subject to delisting from The NASDAQ Capital Market.
In June 2009, we received a letter from the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Staff indicating that we regained compliance with the bid price rule, andrule. As of June 30, 2010, we believe we are currently in compliance with all continued listing standards.
(20)
Early Termination of Lease(20) Subsequent Events
On May 1, 2008,In July 2010, the Company and R&H Investments reached an agreement upon early terminationannounced that it has concluded its engagement with Lazard Middle Market following a review of the Company’s lease in Webster, Texas. The lease provided for rental paymentsstrategic alternatives by its Board of $27,000 monthly, which escalated annually through the lease termination of February 2015. In addition,Directors (See Note 15). As a result, the Company was responsible for all maintenance, utilities, and taxes on the building through the lease terms. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid rent through June 30, 2008 and transferred ownership of 2.9 acres of vacant land owned by the Companyrealigned its corporate structure in order to R&H Investments. The Company recognized lease termination expenses of approximately $0.4 in fiscal year 2008 million representing consideration paid and forfeited leasehold improvements.optimize operational efficiencies.

 

45


(21)
Early Termination of Cost Plus Award Fee Contract
In May, 2008,The Company’s corporate realignment included the Company receivedtermination of James Royston, President of Astrotech Corporation, allowing for a letter from ARES notifyinggreater focus on the Companysatellite payload processing of ARES’s intent to terminate the Cost Plus Award Fee Subcontract No. SGS-0311403.00 with the Company (the “Subcontract”) pursuant to section GP-07(7.2) of the General Provisions as set forth in Attachment J-7 to the Subcontract. The provision referred to in ARES’s correspondence provides for termination for “convenience.”
As stated in ARES’s letter “...the objective of the Subcontract was to assist NASA’s continued development and operation of the International Space Station...”its ASO business unit. The Company has consistently received excellent reviews for its performance underno immediate plans to fill the Subcontract and has earned near maximum award fees. Previously, 45 employees of the Company were engaged under the Subcontract, which resulted in no revenues for the current fiscal year.vacancy created by Mr. Royston’s termination.
The Company and ARES have not resolved certain issues relative to the early termination of the Subcontract,subcontract in May 2008, including, but not limited to, certain amountsa receivable from ARES under this contract totaling $1.5$1.4 million. The Company wrote off $0.1 million of unbilled receivables in connection with this agreement in the period ended June 30, 2010. In July 2010, the Company received $1.2 million from ARES. The remaining $0.2 million balance is evaluating its contractual rights and other options with respectexpected to ARES’s claimed terminationbe paid upon completion of the Subcontract, including ARES’s obligations with respect to such claimed termination.
(22)
Subsequent Events
2005 through 2008 governmental audits by the DCAA.
Executive Compensation(21) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In AugustDecember 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 805,Business Combinations(“ASC 805”), previously referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations.ASC 805 will significantly change current practices regarding business combinations. Among the more significant changes, ASC 805 expands the definition of a business and a business combination; requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests (including goodwill), measured at fair value at the acquisition date; requires acquisition-related expenses and restructuring costs to be recognized separately from the business combination; and requires in-process research and development to be capitalized at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. ASC 805 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 805 in the first quarter of 2010 and its adoption did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the Compensation Committee, withFASB issued ASC No. 105,Generally Accepted Accounting Principles(“GAAP”) (“ASC 105” or “FASB Codification”), previously referred to as SFAS No. 168,The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the concurrenceHierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No 162(“SFAS 168”). The effective date for use of the independent DirectorsFASB Codification is for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Companies should account for the adoption of the guidance on a prospective basis. The Company granted cashadopted the FASB Codification in the first quarter of 2010 and equity awardsits adoption did not have an effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC No. 810, Consolidation, previously referred to as SFAS 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),which significantly changes the consolidation model for variable interest entities. ASC No. 810 requires companies to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct matters that most significantly affect the activities of the VIE, and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the Chief Executive Officer and certain directorsVIE. The standard shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company in recognitiondoes not expect that the adoption of ASC No. 810 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures(Topic 820):Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements(“ASU 2010-06”). Reporting entities will have to provide information about movements of assets among Levels 1 and 2; and a reconciliation of purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements of activity valued with a Level 3 method, of the successful fiscalthree-tier fair value hierarchy established by SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (ASC 820). The ASU 2010-06 also clarifies the existing guidance to require fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 for Level 1 and 2 disclosure requirements and after December 15, 2010 for Level 3 disclosure requirements. The Company adopted ASU No. 2010-06 in the third quarter of 2010 and it did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None to report for the year 2009 recapitalization of the Company.
         
Officer/Director Restricted Stock Awards  Cash Bonus 
         
Thomas B. Pickens, III
Chief Executive Officer, Director and Chairman
  750,000  $200,000 
William F. Readdy
Director
  110,000  $ 
Mark E. Adams
Director
  160,000  $ 
John A. Oliva
Director
  145,000  $ 
Sha-Chelle Manning
Director
  110,000  $ 
In addition, the Compensation Committee granted restricted stock awards to officers and employees of the Company that included risk of forfeiture prior to vesting. Such awards encompassed the following:
         
Named Executive Officer Restricted Stock Awards  Cash Bonus 
         
John M. Porter
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  300,000  $100,000 
Don M. White
Senior Vice President
  75,000  $92,383 
Additionally, 345,559 restricted stock awards were granted to Astrotech employees not noted above. The restricted stock granted in August and September 2009 vest over a 3 year period, at 33% each year, beginning inended June 30, 2010. The restricted stock awards were granted out of the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan and were valued at $2.3 million, which will be recognized ratably over the vesting period.
Formation of Board of Directors’ Executive Committee
In July 2009, the Board of Directors created an Executive Committee comprised of current Astrotech Directors. Thomas B. Pickens III was approved as Chairman of the Executive Committee, and the other members include Mark Adams, Sha-Chelle Manning, William F. Readdy and John A. Oliva.

 

46


Shareholder Rights Plan
In July 2009, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Astrotech Shareholder’s Rights Plan and the Company subsequently filed registration Form 8-A with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Government Facility at VAFB
In September 2009, the construction of the U.S. government facility at VAFB was complete and the Company billed the U.S. government for the completion milestone under the contract.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None to report for the period ended June 30, 2009.
Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, and, based on thethat evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially effect,affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report Onon Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 20092010, based on the frame work in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2009.2010.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules§989G of the SecuritiesDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Exchange CommissionConsumer Protection Act, which exempts the Company from the requirement that permit us to provide onlyit include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over our management’s report in this annual report.assessment of internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None to report for the period ended June 30, 2009.2010.

 

47


PART III
Item 10.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
A Board of six directors was elected at the 2009 Annual Meeting. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorize the Board of Directors (“Board”) to determine the number of its members. A director who is appointed by the existing Board of Directors, due to a vacant position or the need for an additional director, will serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until a successor is duly elected and qualified.
The following table shows information as of June 30, 2010, regarding members of the Company’s Board of Directors:
           
    Age as of  Director 
Current Directors ** Principal Occupation June 30, 2010  Since 
           
Thomas B. Pickens, III Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Astrotech Corporation  53   2004 
           
Mark Adams* Founder, President and CEO, Advocate MD Financial Group, Inc.  48   2007 
           
John A. Oliva* Managing Principal, Capital City Advisors, Inc.  54   2008 
           
William F. Readdy* Founder, Discovery Partners, International LLC  58   2008 
           
Sha-Chelle Devlin Manning* Managing Director, Nanoholdings LLC  42   2009 
*Indicates an “independent director”
**Lance W. Lord served as a member of the Board of Directors during the time from the 2009 Annual Meeting through his resignation on June 18, 2010.
Current Directors
Thomas B. Pickens, III
Mr. Pickens was named Astrotech’s Chief Executive Officer in January 2007 and Chairman in February 2008. In 1985, Mr. Pickens founded T.B. Pickens & Co., a company that provides consulting services to corporations, public institutions, and start-up organizations. Additionally, Mr. Pickens is the Managing Partner and Founder of Tactic Advisors, Inc., a company specializing in corporate turnarounds on behalf of creditors and investors that have aggregated to over $20 billion in value. Since 1985, Mr. Pickens has served as President of T.B. Pickens & Co. From 1991 to 2002, Mr. Pickens was the Founder and Chairman of U.S. Utilities, Inc., a company which operated 114 water and sewer utilities on behalf of various companies affiliated with Mr. Pickens. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Pickens directed over 20 direct investments in various venture capital investments and was Founder and Chairman of the Code Corporation. From 1988 to 1993, Mr. Pickens was the Chairman of Catalyst Energy Corporation and was Chairman of United Thermal Corporation (NYSE). Mr. Pickens was also the President of Golden Bear Corporation, Slate Creek Corporation, Eury Dam Corporation, Century Power Corporation, and Vidilia Hydroelectric Corporation. From 1982 to 1988, Mr. Pickens founded Beta Computer Systems, Inc., and Sumpter Partners, and was the General Partner of Grace Pickens Acquisition L.P.

48


Mark Adams
Mr. Adams founded Advocate, MD Financial Group, Inc., a leading Texas-based medical liability insurance holding company, in July 2003. Since July 2003, Mr. Adams has served as its Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer. He is also a founding partner in several other companies including the Endowment Development Group, a Houston-based life insurance company specializing in placing large multimillion dollar life insurance policies throughout the U.S. market. Mr. Adams founded Murphy Adams Restaurant Group in 2007. He owns and operates Mama Fu’s Asian House restaurants throughout the southeast United States. In 2008, Mr. Adams founded Small Business United, LLC, a cutting edge health insurance company for small businesses. Mr. Adams founded Sozo Global, LLC, a rapidly expanding network marketing functional beverage company. Mr. Adams is the winner of the 2008 Prestigious Ernst and Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award for Central Texas. After his career with global public companies such as Xerox and Johnson & Johnson (1985-1988), beginning in 1988, Mr. Adams then spent the next 12 years at Bostik Adhesives where he served in senior management, sales and strategic business roles for their worldwide markets in North America, Latin America, Asia, and Europe. In 1997, Mr. Adams then served as Global Sales Director for Bostik and General Manager of Nitta-Findley Company based in Osaka, Japan and later joined Ward Adhesives, Inc. as a minority owner, General Manager, and Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Adams currently serves as a Director for several public and private companies, as well as a board member for multiple nonprofit organizations. Mr. Adams is also an advisory board member for the McCoy College of Business at Texas State University.
John A. Oliva
John A. Oliva has 30 years of experience in the private equity, investment banking, capital markets, branch management, and asset management sectors. Since 2002, Mr. Oliva has been the Managing Principal of Southeastern Capital Partners BD Inc., a FINRA registered broker/dealer and independent investment banking and advisory firm. Since 2002, Southeast Capital Partners has provided financial advisory services, including mergers/acquisitions, underwriting and raising expansion capital to select mid-tier companies. In addition, Mr. Oliva is the Managing Partner of Capital City Advisors Inc., which provides private merchant banking services to clients in Europe and Asia.
Mr. Oliva has eight FINRA licenses including the Managing Principal and Financial Principal licenses. Prior to joining Southeastern Capital Partners, he worked for Morgan Stanley & Co and served as an advisor to their Private Wealth Management group, developing, reviewing and implementing solutions for investment banking clients, he was also a group manager at Morgan Stanley. Mr. Oliva has been nationally recognized for achievements while at Morgan Stanley & Co. and Shearson/Lehman Brothers in the asset management and investment banking sector. He performed similar key roles at Interstate/Johnson Lane and The Robinson Humphrey Company. Mr. Oliva has also worked on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.
William F. Readdy
From 1974 to 2005, Mr. Readdy served the United States as a naval aviator, pilot astronaut, military officer, and civil service executive. In 2005, Mr. Readdy established Discovery Partners, International LLC, a consulting firm to provide strategic planning, risk management, safety and emerging technology solutions to aerospace and high-tech industries.
He served as a test pilot and instructor between carrier deployments to the North Atlantic, Caribbean and Mediterranean in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Mr. Readdy joined the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in 1986 and in 1987 became a member of the astronaut corps, but continued his military service in the Naval Reserve, attaining the rank of captain before retiring in 2000.
Mr. Readdy logged more than 672 hours in space on three shuttle missions. He commanded his third flight, docking space shuttleAtlantisat the Russian space stationMirin 1996 and oversaw the first exchange of American astronaut researchers living aboard the Russian outpost.
In 2001, Mr. Readdy was appointed as NASA’s associate administrator for space operations and moved to Washington D.C. Following the loss of space shuttleColumbiain February 2003, Mr. Readdy chaired NASA’s Space Flight Leadership Council, and oversaw the agency’s recovery from the accident and the shuttle’s successful return to flight in July 2005.
Mr. Readdy was honored as a Meritorious Rank Executive by President Bush in 2003 and in 2005 was awarded NASA’s highest honor, the Distinguished Service Medal for the second time. He has also been the recipient of NASA’s Outstanding Leadership Medal three times and the Exceptional Service Medal twice. In addition he is the recipient of numerous national and international aviation and space awards, and has been recognized for his contributions to aerospace safety.

49


Sha-Chelle Manning
Since September 1, 2008, Sha-Chelle Manning has been Managing Director of Nanoholdings LLC, a company that commercializes scientific breakthroughs in nanotechnology that solve energy efficiency challenges with some of the world’s best scientists and universities. From January 2007 to December 31, 2008, Ms. Manning was Vice-President at Authentix, a Carlyle company, that is the leader in authentication solutions for Fortune 500 companies and governments around the world for brand protection, excise tax recovery, and nano-scaled enabled authentication of security documents and pharmaceutical drugs. From September 2005 to April 2007, Ms. Manning was a consultant to the Office of the Governor of Texas, Rick Perry, where she led the development of various strategic initiatives including the Texas Nanotechnology Initiative. Prior to these assignments, Ms. Manning was Director of Alliances at Zyvex Corporation from August 2002 to September 2005, where she was responsible for the commercialization of nanotechnology products (consumer, energy, and defense) introduced and sold into the marketplace in partnership with key government agencies and industry. Ms. Manning also served as a Vice President for Winstar Communications (acquired by IDT) where she commercialized and brought to market broadband wireless technologies and web-enabled platforms. Several of her projects were launched by the White House including “the Virtual Wall” (www.vvmf.org), honoring the 58,195 Vietnam Veterans who made the ultimate sacrifice for their country.
Ms. Manning continues and or has provided strategic consulting for some of the following organizations: Lockheed Martin (Office of the CTO), Texas A&M University System (Vice-Chancellor for Research); HRL Laboratories (Office of the CEO); KERA-PBS, Zyvex Labs (atomically precise manufacturing to enable quantum devices and computing), and Nano-Retina (a nano-enabled artificial retina to restore vision).
Ms. Manning serves on the advisory boards of the non-profit organizations; Soul Arts and Music Foundation, and the Clean Technology and Sustainable Industries. Ms. Manning has served as one of the NSTI (Nanotechnology Society Technical Industry) Conference Chairs both in 2008 and 2010. Ms. Manning received a MBA in Telecommunications from the University of Dallas.
Executive Officers and Key Employees of the Company who are Not Directors
Set forth below is a summary of the background and business experience of the executive officers of the Company who are not nominees of the Board of Directors:
           
        With 
    Age as of  Company 
Name Position(s) June 30, 2010  Since 
           
John M. Porter Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary  38   2008 
           
Don M. White Jr. Senior Vice President, GM of Astrotech Space Operations  47   2005 
James Royston served as President until his termination from Astrotech Corporation in July 2010.
The executive officers and key employees named below will serve in such capacities until the next annual meeting of the Company’s Board of Directors, or until their respective successors have been duly elected and have been qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation, disqualification, or removal from office.
John M. Porter
Mr. Porter joined Astrotech in October 2008 and serves as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. He is responsible for overall strategic planning, corporate development and finance. His primary areas of focus is utilizing financial management to support the core spacecraft payload processing business while efficiently advancing the Company’s biotechnology initiatives in microgravity processing and commercializing advanced technologies that have been developed in and around the space industry.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Porter co-founded Arabella Securities, an investment banking firm that specialized in providing trading services and equity research on small-cap companies to institutional investors. He headed the Equity Research department, and published research on small companies in the Healthcare Technology sector. Arabella Securities subsequently merged with another broker/dealer in 2006 where Mr. Porter continued to lead the firm’s Healthcare investment banking practice. Mr. Porter previously served as Director of Business Development for Luminex Corporation (NASDAQ: LMNX), a leading developer of biological testing technologies for the Diagnostic and life sciences industries. While at Luminex, Mr. Porter was responsible for the development, negotiation and management of Luminex’s strategic partnership program. During his tenure at Luminex, over 40 new strategic licensing partnerships were formed with companies around the globe including Hitachi Software (Japan), Qiagen (Germany), Tepnel (UK), Invitrogen (formerly Biosource, US), Inverness Medical (US), Millipore Corporation (formerly Upstate Biotech, US), and many other world class companies. Mr. Porter performed additional duties including strategic planning, product development, marketing management, and investor relations. Mr. Porter also served in multiple capacities during the preparation, and execution of Luminex’s initial public offering (IPO) in March 2000, where the company successfully raised approximately $100M.

50


Mr. Porter has a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia. In addition, Mr. Porter earned a Master of Business Administration from the A.B. Freeman School of Business at Tulane University and holds a Master of Science in Physical Chemistry & Material Science from Tulane University in New Orleans.
Don M. White Jr.
Don M. White has been instrumental in leading Astrotech’s satellite processing operations since 2005. As Senior Vice President and General Manager of Astrotech Space Operations, Mr. White oversees a rigorous satellite payload processing schedule. He is also responsible for expanding business services, improving profitability, and managing current contracts. Additionally, Mr. White maintains ongoing negotiations with all customers, pledging that every mission contract process is streamlined with the utmost efficacy and safety.
Prior to joining the Astrotech team, Mr. White’s 21 years of Aerospace experience included employment at Lockheed Martin as their Payloads/Ordnance Chief Engineer. He was then promoted to Mission Support Manager, leading various aspects of the Atlas V Development Program. Mr. White’s extensive aerospace experience also includes providing leadership to the Titan and Shuttle External Tank programs while at Martin Marietta Corporation.
Mr. White has a Master of Business Administration from the Florida Institute of Technology and a Bachelor of Science in Industrial technology from the University of West Florida.
Operations of the Board of Directors
Board Member Attendance at Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The Company strongly encourages each member of the Board of Directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, we expect most, if not all, of the Company’s directors to be in attendance at the meeting. All of our directors attended the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors and its committees meet periodically during the year as deemed appropriate. During 2010, the Board of Directors met eight times. No director attended fewer than 75% of all the 2010 meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees on which each such director served.
Director Nomination Process
Astrotech’s Director nominees are approved by the Board after considering the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
A Board of five Directors is expected to be elected at the Annual Meeting. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that, with respect to any vacancies or newly created directorships, the Board will nominate such individuals as may be specified by a majority vote of the then sitting directors.
Regarding nominations for directors, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies nominees in various ways. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the current directors that have expressed interest in, and that continue to satisfy, the criteria for serving on the Board. Other nominees may be proposed by current directors, members of management, or by shareholders. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may engage a professional firm to identify and evaluate potential director nominees, but has not paid any of such fees to date. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the Board at a strategic level looking for industry and professional experience that complements the Company’s goals and direction. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has established certain criteria it considers as nominating guidelines for the Board of Directors. The criteria include:
the candidate’s independence;
the candidate’s depth of business experience;
the candidate’s availability to serve;

51


the candidate’s integrity and personal and professional ethics;
the balance of the business experience on the Board as a whole; and
the need for specific expertise on the Board.
The informationcriteria are not exhaustive and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors may consider other qualifications and attributes which they believe are appropriate in evaluating the ability of an individual to serve as a member of the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s goal is to assemble a Board of Directors that brings to the Company a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience. In order to ensure that the Board consists of members with a variety of perspectives and skills, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has not set any minimum qualifications and also considers candidates with appropriate non-business backgrounds. Other than ensuring that at least one member of the Board is a financial expert and a majority of the Board members meet all applicable independence requirements, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not have any specific skills that it believes are necessary for any individual director to possess. Instead, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates potential nominees based on the contribution such nominee’s background and skills could have upon the overall functioning of the Board.
Committees of the Board of Directors
During fiscal year 2010, the Board of Directors had three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Each such committee currently consists of three persons and each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees is required, at the minimum, to meet the “independence” requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market’s Marketplace Rules. The Governance and Nominating Committee, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee have adopted a charter that governs its authority, responsibilities and operation. The Company periodically reviews, both internally and with the Board, the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules of the SEC and NASDAQ regarding corporate governance policies, processes and listing standards. In conformity with the requirement of such rules and listing standards, we have adopted a written Audit Committee Charter, a Compensation Committee Charter, and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, which may be found on the Company’s web site at www.astrotechcorp.com under “For Investors” or by this item willwriting to Astrotech Corporation, 401 Congress Avenue, Suite 1650, Austin, Texas 78701, Attention “Investor Relations” and requesting copies.
The Board of Directors has determined each of the following directors to be containedan “independent director” as such term is defined by Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules: Mark Adams; John A. Oliva; Sha-Chelle Manning and William F. Readdy.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was created by the Board of Directors in our definitive Proxy StatementFebruary 2004. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s charter was adopted by the Committee and approved by the Board in May 2004. The charter is available in the “For Investors” section of the Company’s web site at www.astrotechcorp.com. The primary purpose of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is to provide oversight on the broad range of issues surrounding the composition and operation of the Board of Directors, including identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and recommending to the Board director nominees for our 2009the next Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders. As of the end of fiscal year 2010 the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consisted of Mr. Adams (Chairman), Ms. Manning and Mr. Oliva. During fiscal year 2010, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met once.

52


The Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is composed solely of independent directors that meet the requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and operates under a written charter adopted by the Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors in May 2004. The charter is available on the Company’s web site which is www.astrotechcorp.com. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing and compensating a firm of independent registered public accountants to audit the Company’s financial statements, as well as oversight of the performance and review of the scope of the audit performed by the Company’s independent registered public accountants. The Audit Committee also reviews audit plans and procedures, changes in accounting policies, and the use of the independent registered public accountants for non-audit services. As of the end of fiscal year 2010, the Audit Committee consisted of Mr. Oliva (Chairman), Mr. Adams, and Ms. Manning. During fiscal year 2010, the Audit Committee met five times. The Board of Directors has determined that John A. Oliva met the qualification guidelines as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
Mr. Nieboer resigned as Director on September 30, 2009. Subsequently, Ms. Manning was appointed to the Audit Committee in October 2009.
The Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors that meet the requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and operates under a written charter adopted by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors in May 2004, and amended in May 2005. The charter is available on the Company’s web site at www.astrotechcorp.com. The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation and benefits of all executive officers of the Company and establishing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of employees of the Company. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company’s 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1995 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in those plans. As of the end of fiscal year 2010, the Compensation Committee consisted of Mr. Adams (Chairman), Mr. Readdy, and Mr. Oliva. During fiscal year 2010, the Compensation Committee met three times.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
The Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applies to all directors, officers, and employees of Astrotech. The key principles of this code include acting legally and ethically, speaking up, getting advice, and dealing fairly with the Company’s Shareholders. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on the Company’s web site at www.astrotechcorp.com and is hereby incorporatedavailable to the Company’s Shareholders upon request. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct meets the requirements for a “Code of Conduct” under the SEC rules for financial officers.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Such directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% Shareholders are required by reference thereto.SEC regulation to furnish to the Company copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Due dates for the reports are specified by those laws, and the Company is required to disclose in this document any failure in the past fiscal year to file by the required dates. Based solely on written representations of the Company’s directors, executive officers and 10% Shareholders and on copies of the reports that they have filed with the SEC, it is the Company’s belief that all of Astrotech’s directors, executive officers and 10% Shareholders complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions in the Company’s equity securities during fiscal year 2010.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview
Astrotech provides a range of products and services that focus on utilizing space for the needs of government and commercial applications. Our core business operates spacecraft pre-launch facilities and provides supporting services at three domestic launch sites. We develop and operate space flight hardware assets, provide manned and unmanned payload processing services, and develop commercial product using space-based technology. In anticipation of the planned 2011 space shuttle retirement, we began developing new products and services within our strategic focus on the commercial exploitations of space.

53


Achieving our Company’s aspirations requires a highly skilled, motivated team. Thus, our compensation system is designed to be competitive with those of other companies that compete for highly skilled technical employees and executives. Our performance-based compensation system is intended to include incentives for innovation and entrepreneurial spirit.
Guiding Principles
The Compensation Committee strives to achieve our strategic objectives by designing our compensation program to offer competitive base compensation to attract and retain experienced qualified executives while offering incentives to foster the innovation and entrepreneurial spirit necessary for executing our business strategy and rewards for successful achievement of performance goals. In designing our executive compensation program, we are guided by five principles:
Establish target compensation levels that are competitive within the industries and the markets in which we compete for executive talent;
Structure executive compensation so that our executives share in Astrotech’s successes and failures by correlating compensation with target levels based upon business performance;
Link pay to performance by making a percentage of total executive compensation variable, or “at risk”, through an annual determination of performance-based incentive compensation;
Align a portion of executive pay with shareholder interests through equity awards; and
Maintain a company-wide entrepreneurial atmosphere by minimizing special “executive only” benefits or prerequisites.
Operation of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers our executive compensation program and monitors the Company’s overall compensation strategy to ensure that executive compensation supports the Company’s business objectives. The Compensation Committee reviews and determines salary, short-term incentives, long-term incentives and other benefits for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and certain named executive officers (“NEOs”).
For a more complete discussion of the responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, see the Operations of the Board of Directors — The Compensation Committee, and the charter for the Compensation Committee, posted on our web site at www.astrotechcorp.com.
The Compensation Program
The key components of our current compensation program for Astrotech executive officers are:
Base salary;
Short-term cash incentives;
Long-term performance-based and other equity awards; and
Other benefits.
To remain competitive, the Compensation Committee periodically benchmarks our executive compensation program to determine how actual compensation targets and levels compare to our overall philosophy and target markets. The primary focus of the benchmarking process is on public companies in the aerospace, defense and government contractor industries of similar or otherwise comparable size and complexity. This benchmarking considers information from proxy data for the peer group’s CEO and NEOs and was last presented to the Compensation Committee in July 2010.
Other Considerations in Determining Executive Compensation
We believe that our executive compensation properly incentivizes our senior management to focus on the overall goals of the Company. Each element of our Executive Compensation Program is structured towards specific objectives. If a unique situation occurs where incentive goal adjustment or stock option repricing are considered, the Compensation Committee will perform a review of the individual facts and circumstances before taking any action.

54


Role of the Compensation Committee and CEO in Determining Executive Compensation
Mr. Pickens is not a member of the Compensation Committee. He did not attend the Compensation Committee meetings in August 2009 or July 2010, which discussed NEO and all other employee compensation.
Base Salary
Base salary is designed to compensate our employees in part for their roles and responsibilities, and also to provide a fixed level of compensation that serves as a retention tool throughout the executive’s career. Initial base salaries were set considering each executive’s roles and responsibilities, current skills, future potential and comparable market compensation. Typically, the Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of each NEO annually. Adjustments are made based on individual performance, changes in roles and responsibilities, and external market data for similar positions.
Short-term Cash Incentives
At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, we provide annual incentive awards under our Key Employee Incentive Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”). These short-term cash incentives are designed to reward the achievement of specific, pre-set financial results measured over the fiscal year in which that compensation is earned. Generally, we compute the Bonus Plan after the end of each fiscal year and make the cash awards during the first quarter of the next fiscal year. The Bonus Plan encompasses all employees of the Company based upon maximum award levels stated as a percentage of base salary (“Payout Percentage”). The maximum award levels are set within our salary-grade structure for each salary grade ranging from 5% to 50%.
For fiscal year 2010, the Compensation Committee approved a Bonus Plan encompassing three equally weighted “Bonus Elements,” each based upon specific objectives set by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the fiscal year. The sum of the Payout Percentage for each of the Bonus Elements, then is applied to the award levels for each employee to determine the Bonus Award. For fiscal year 2010, the Compensation Committee had established the following three Bonus Elements:
Item 11. 
Individual Performance — A Payout Percentage of up to 33% of the individual’s total bonus is based upon the officer or employee’s performance of his job responsibilities and achievement of individual goals as determined through the annual performance review process.
Business Unit Performance — A Payout Percentage of up to 33% of the individual’s total bonus is to be awarded based upon the financial performance of the officer or employee’s business unit based upon net income, relative to the approved budget for the fiscal year.
Corporate Performance — A Payout Percentage of up to 33% of the individual’s total bonus is to be awarded based upon the financial performance of the Company, as measured by comparing the approved budget of revenue, net income and backlog to actual results for the fiscal year.
Given the dynamic marketplace and the possibility of unforeseen developments, the Compensation Committee has discretionary authority to adjust such awards to reflect actual performance in light of such developments or to make other discretionary adjustments to the overall Payout Percentage or to individual employee bonuses. Bonus maximum award levels range from 30% to 50% of base salaries for our NEOs. On average, we target our short term cash incentives to comprise approximately 15% of the total compensation package of our NEOs.
Long-term Non-cash Incentive Awards
Our long-term incentive awards are used to link Company performance and increases in shareholder value to the total compensation of our NEOs. These awards are also key components of our ability to attract and retain our NEOs. The annualized value of the awards to our NEOs is intended to be a significant component of the overall compensation package. On average, and assuming performance is on target, these awards are targeted to represent up to 40% of the total compensation package, consistent with our emphasis on linking executive pay to shareholder value.
Our shareholder-approved incentive plans allow for the granting of stock options based upon Astrotech’s stock prices in the public markets. Stock options are granted with an exercise price not less than the market price of our common stock on the grant date. Options generally vest over a period of four years with 25% becoming exercisable on each anniversary of the grant date as long as the recipient is still employed by the Company on the date of vesting, and generally expire after ten years.

55


Stock awards, restricted stock grants and stock option awards were made to our NEOs in August 2009 and November 2009, in the amounts set forth in the table labeled Fiscal Year 2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.
Benefits
Our benefit programs are established based upon an assessment of competitive market factors and a determination of what is needed to attract and retain high caliber executives and other employees. Astrotech’s primary benefits for executives include participation in the Company’s broad-based plans: the 401(k) Plan, the Company’s health, dental and vision plans and term life and disability insurance plans. The Company also provides certain executives, including some NEOs, with supplemental disability insurance. This plan offers additional income protection to Senior Vice Presidents and above and is provided to supplement the monthly benefit amounts that are capped in the general disability policy. The Company provides 1.5 times of each NEOs annual base salary to a maximum of $300,000 in term life insurance and pays the premium for such insurance. The fair value of premiums paid in excess of IRS limitations are included as other income reported for the NEO.
Indemnification Agreements
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its NEOs. The agreements provide that the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each indemnitee from liabilities incurred as a result of such indemnitee’s status as an officer or employee of the Company, subject to certain limitations.
Post-Termination Compensation
The Compensation Committee believes that severance benefits and change of control benefits are necessary in order to attract and retain the caliber and quality of executive that the Company needs in its most senior positions. These benefits are particularly important to provide for continuity of senior management allowing executives to focus on results and long-term strategic initiatives.
As of June 30, 2010, Mr. Pickens, Mr. Royston and Mr. White were the executives with existing employment contracts. In July 2010, Mr. Royston was terminated from Astrotech. The agreements provide for severance payments and benefits if termination occurs without “cause” or if the executive leaves for “good reason.” There is also additional compensation provided in circumstances following such termination after a “change in control.” Additional information regarding the severance and change in control payments, including a definition of key terms and a quantification of benefits that would have been received by our NEOs at termination is found under Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control, which follows.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Company has not established stock ownership guidelines.
Tax Deductibility Policy
The Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation for federal income tax purposes in the design of the Company’s compensation programs. We believe that all of the incentive compensation paid to our NEOs for fiscal year 2010 qualifies as “performance-based compensation” and thus, is fully deductible by the Company for federal income tax purposes. While we generally seek to ensure the deductibility of the incentive compensation paid to our NEOs, the Compensation Committee intends to retain the flexibility necessary to provide cash and equity compensation in line with competitive practice, our compensation philosophy, and the best interest of our Shareholders even if these amounts are not fully tax deductible. The employment agreements between the Company and its NEOs provide for interpretation, operation and administration consistent with the intent of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, to the extent applicable.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Company’s Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Adams (Chairman), Mr. Readdy and Mr. Oliva. Mr. Adams is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Advocate MD. Mr. Pickens previously served on the Board of Directors of Advocate MD until his resignation in November 2009.
Compensation Committee Report
Astrotech’s Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and, based on such review and discussion, has recommended to the Board of Directors that such Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Form 10-K for fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
Mark Adams
John A. Oliva
William F. Readdy

August 26, 2010

56


Executive Compensation
The Summary Compensation Table provides compensation information about Astrotech’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and the other most highly compensated executive officers.
Summary Compensation Table
                                 
                      Spacetech       
Name and             Stock  Option  Incentive  All Other    
Principal         Bonus  Awards  Awards  Awards  Compensation    
Position Year  Salary ($)  ($)(1)  ($)(2)  ($)(3)  ($)(4)  ($)(5)  Total ($) 
                                 
Thomas B. Pickens, III;  2010   380,000   57,000         361,782   24,091   822,873 
Chief Executive Officer  2009   360,000   200,000   847,500         11,974   1,419,474 
                                 
John M. Porter(6);
  2010   250,000   37,500         227,704   11,900   527,104 
Chief Finance Officer  2009   142,500   100,000   339,000   30,040      7,378   618,918 
                                 
Don M. White(7);
  2010   200,470   91,000            10,703   302,173 
Sr. VP, GM of Astrotech Space Operations  2009   184,765   92,383   84,750   14,160      9,879   385,937 
                                 
James D. Royston(8);
  2010   210,000   150,000   185,000      50,100   8,958   604,058 
President  2009   210,000               813   210,813 
                                 
Lance W. Lord(9);
  2010   240,000   75,000   370,000         24,072   709,072 
Former Chief Executive Officer, Astrotech Space Operations  2009   225,000               703   225,703 
                                 
Brian K. Harrington;  2010                      
Former Chief Financial Officer  2009   207,692               85,556   293,248 
(1)
See narrative onShort-term Cash Incentives: Bonus was awarded in August 2010, for performance in fiscal year 2010, except for Mr. Royston and Mr. Lord who received payment in November 2009.
(2)
See narrative onLong-term Incentive Non-cash Awards: Includes restricted stock granted on August 19, 2009 of 750,000 shares to Mr. Pickens, 300,000 shares to Mr. Porter and 75,000 shares to Mr. White. On November 13, 2009, Mr. Royston received 100,000 shares of restricted stock and Mr. Lord received 200,000 shares of restricted stock.
(3)Option awards are valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model at the grant date.
(4)
Consists of grants of restricted stock and warrants for Astrogenetix and 1st Detect. On January 19, 2010, Mr. Pickens received 500 shares of restricted stock and 1,000 warrants in Astrogenetix, Mr. Porter received 400 shares of restricted stock and 800 warrants in Astrogenetix and Mr. Royston received 300 shares of restricted stock in Astrogenetix. On January 19, 2010, Mr. Pickens received 300 shares of restricted stock and 680 warrants in 1st Detect and Mr. Porter received 200 shares of restricted stock and 180 warrants in 1st Detect.
(5)
SeeSchedule of All Other Compensationthat follows for further detail.
(6)Mr. Porter began employment with Astrotech in October 2008. His annual salary was $195,000 in fiscal 2009.
(7)In addition to his fiscal year 2010 performance bonus of $75,000, Mr. White was awarded a bonus of $16,000 in February 2010 in recognition of his efforts which resulted in the timely completion of ASO’s new 5-meter processing facility at VAFB.
(8)Mr. Royston was terminated on July 13, 2010.
(9)Mr. Lord was appointed Chief Executive Compensation.Officer of Astrotech Space Operations in June 2008. Prior to that time, Mr. Lord was a member of the Board of Directors. Mr. Lord resigned from Astrotech Corporation effective June 18, 2010.
Schedule of All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2010
                 
  401(K) Plan          
  Company  Supplemental       
  Matching  Disability Insurance       
Named Executive Contributions  Premium     Total 
Officer ($)  ($)  Other Benefits ($)  ($) 
                 
Thomas B. Pickens, III(1)
  9,952   1,578   12,561   24,091 
                 
John M. Porter  10,894   1,006      11,900 
                 
Don M. White  9,903   800      10,703 
                 
James D. Royston(2)
  8,077   881      8,958 
                 
Lance W. Lord(3)
     995   23,077   24,072 
(1)Mr. Pickens employement contract includes a car allowance of $1,000 per month. Astrotech paid $561 for a healthclub membership for Mr. Pickens during fiscal 2010.
(2)Mr. Royston was terminated on July 13, 2010.
(3)Mr. Lord resigned as Chief Executive Officer of Astrotech Space Operations in June 2010. Included in Other Benefits is accrued vacation paid upon his resignation.

57


Fiscal Year 2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table shows additional information regarding: (i) the target and presumed maximum level of annual cash incentive awards for the Company’s executive officers for performance during fiscal year 2011, as established by the Compensation Committee under the Company’s Key Employee Incentive Bonus Plan; and (ii) Spacetech equity awards granted in January 2010 that were awarded to help retain the NEOs and focus their attention on building Shareholder value. The actual amount of the annual cash incentive award received by each NEO for performance during fiscal year 2010 is shown in the Fiscal Year 2010 Summary Compensation Table.
                             
          All Other               
  Estimated Future  Stock               
  Payouts Under Non-  Awards:               
  Equity Incentive Plan  Number of  Spacetech      Grant Date  Grant
  Awards  Shares  Restricted  Spacetech  Fair Value  Date of
  Target  Maximum  Restricted  Stock  Warrants  of Equity  Equity
Name ($)(1)  ($)(1)  Stock (#)(2)  (#)(3)  (#)(3)  ($)  Awards
                             
Thomas B. Pickens, III  119,700   199,500      800   1,680   361,782  January 19, 2010
                             
John M. Porter  82,500   137,500      600   980   227,704  January 19, 2010
                             
Don M. White  67,500   112,500              
                             
James D. Royston(4)
        100,000   300      235,100  November 13, 2009 &
January 19, 2010
                             
Lance Lord(5)
        200,000         370,000  November 13, 2009
No options were awarded to NEO’s during fiscal year 2010.
(1)Estimated bonus for Mr. Pickens, Mr. Porter, and Mr. White are computed at a maximum of 50% of base salary. Estimated target bonus percentage is 30% of base salary.
(2)Represents restricted stock granted to Mr. Royston on November 13, 2009.
(3)Represents Astrogenetix and 1st Detect restricted stock and warrants granted to Mr. Pickens, Mr. Porter and Mr. Royston on January 19, 2010.
(4)Mr. Royston was terminated from Astrotech on July 13, 2010.
(5)Mr. Lord resigned from Astrotech on June 18, 2010.
Employment Agreements
During fiscal year 2010, the Company had employments agreements in place with Mr. Pickens, Mr. White, Mr. Lord and Mr. Royston. Each employment agreement sets forth, among other things, the NEO’s minimum base salary, bonus opportunities and provisions with respect to certain payments and other benefits upon termination of employment under certain circumstances such as without “Cause,” leaving employment for “Good Reason” or a “Change in Control.” Please see Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control for a description of such provisions.
The minimum base salary set in the employment agreement for Mr. Pickens is $360,000, for Mr. White is $184,765, for Mr. Lord is $175,000 and for Mr. Royston is $210,000. Mr. Lord was paid his salary pro rata through the date of his resignation, June 18, 2010. Mr. Royston was paid his salary pro rata through the date of his termination on July 13, 2010.
The NEOs participate in the Key Employee Incentive Bonus Plan in accordance with the terms of the plan which includes all employees of the Director level and above. In accordance with that Plan, all NEO’s maximum bonus is 50%, subject to Compensation Committee discretion.
Awards
On January 19, 2010, an independent committee of the Board of Directors of 1st Detect, a subsidiary of the Company, approved a grant of 1,180 restricted stock shares and 1,820 stock purchase warrants to certain officers, Directors and employees of 1st Detect. Additionally, on the same day, an independent committee of the Board of Directors of Astrogenetix, a subsidiary of the Company, approved a grant of 1,550 restricted stock shares and 2,050 stock purchase warrants to certain officers, directors and employees of Astrogenetix.
The Compensation Committee also awarded bonuses to directors, NEOs, and employees in August 2010, in recognition of the employee performance during fiscal year 2010.
Salary and Bonus in Proportion to Total Compensation
We believe that a substantial portion of each NEO’s compensation should be in the form of performance based awards, particularly equity based awards which align the interests of management with that of the Shareholders. In 2010, the total compensation of our NEOs was consistent with this philosophy. Providing long-term compensation such as equity awards allows the Company to attract and incentivize qualified executives with less cash outlay, and to retain the executives over a longer period.

58


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2010 End
The following table shows certain information about unexercised options as of June 30, 2010.
Schedule of Outstanding Equity Awards
                     
      Option Awards & Warrants 
  Number of  Number of          
  Securities  Securities          
  Underlying  Underlying          
  Unexercised  Unexercised  Option       
  Options (#)  Options (#)  Exercise  Spacetech    
Name Exercisable(1)  Unexercisable(2)  Price ($)  Warrants (#)(3)  Expiration Date 
                     
Thomas B. Pickens, III(3)
  100,000      0.45       07/18/2010 
   1,000      20.80       12/01/2011 
   500      7.70       12/01/2012 
   500      7.20       12/12/2013 
               1,680   01/19/2017 
                     
John M. Porter  100,000      0.35       10/01/2018 
               980   01/19/2017 
                     
Don M. White(4)
  8,900      0.45       07/18/2010 
   900   300   11.50       08/09/2016 
   12,500   37,500   0.33       10/06/2018 
  
James D. Royston(5)
  75,000      0.45       07/18/2010 
   300      7.00       09/17/2012 
   400      10.20       08/07/2013 
   1,200      24.10       08/16/2014 
   1,200      14.30       08/03/2015 
   1,500   500   11.50       08/09/2016 
(1)All exercisable options will expire 90 days after the date of an employee’s termination.
(2)Options vest ratable over a four year period, with the exception of the July 18, 2009, grants, which vested on January 15, 2009 and expired on July 18, 2010.
(3)
Spacetech warrants are unexercisable. Stock price is based on grant date fair value: $212.00 for 1st Detect and $167.00 for Astrogenetix.
(4)All exercisable options with an expiration date of July 18, 2010 were exercised prior to expiration date.
(5)All exercisable options with an expiration date of July 18, 2010 were exercised prior to expiration date. Mr. Royston was terminated on July 13, 2010.
The following table provides information with respect to the vesting of each NEO’s outstanding unexercisable options and warrants:
Schedule of Vesting Astrotech Stock Option Grants
                 
Name 08/09/2010  10/06/2010  10/06/2011  10/06/2012 
 
Don M. White  300   12,500   12,500   12,500 
                 
James D. Royston  500          
                 
Schedule of Vesting Spacetech Warrant Grants
         
Name 01/19/2011  01/19/2012 
         
Thomas B. Pickens, III(1)
  840   840 
         
John Porter(1)
  490   490 
(1)
Warrants granted to Mr. Pickens and Mr. Porter in January 2010 for 1st Detect and Astrogenetix.

59


2010 Option Exercises and Stock Granted
During fiscal year 2010, there were no stock options exercised by the Company’s CEO or other NEOs. The following table sets forth the number and corresponding value realized during fiscal year 2010 and reflecting the grants made on August 19, 2009 and November 13, 2009, with respect to common stock or restricted stock grants.
                                 
          Restricted  Spacetech Warrant  Spacetech Restricted Stock 
  Option Awards  Stock Awards  Awards  Awards 
  Number                       
  of Shares  Value  Number      Number  Value  Number    
  Acquired  Realized  of Shares  Value  of Shares  Realized  of Shares  Value 
  on  on  Acquired  Realized  Acquired  on  Acquired  Realized 
Name Exercise  Exercise  on Grant  on Grant ($)  on Grant  Grant ($)  on Grant  on Grant ($) 
 
Thomas B. Pickens III(1)
        750,000   847,500   1,680   214,682   800   147,100 
 
John M. Porter(1)
        300,000   339,000   980   118,504   600   109,200 
 
James D. Royston(2)
        100,000   185,000         300   50,100 
 
Lance W. Lord(3)
        200,000   370,000             
(1)Awards of restricted stock vesting 33.33% on August 19, 2010, 33.33% on August 19, 2011, and 33.33% on August 19, 2012.
(2)Awards of restricted stock vesting 33.33% on November 13, 2010, 33.33% on November 13, 2011, and 33.33% on November 13, 2012. Mr. Royston was terminated on July 13, 2010.
(3)Awards of restricted stock vesting 33.33% on November 13, 2010, 33.33% on November 13, 2011, and 33.33% on November 13, 2012. Mr. Lord resigned on June 18, 2010.
The Company granted restricted stock units to the NEO’s during fiscal 2010. Refer to the table entitled “Fiscal Year 2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” included in Item 11 of this Form 10-K for further detail.
Pension Benefits
All employees of the Company, including NEOs, are eligible to participate in the Astrotech 401(k) plan. In accordance with this plan, employees are eligible to contribute up to 25% of their base salary subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations into the plan with all such contributions being fully vested upon contribution. The Company will match, dollar for dollar, up to 5% of the employee’s contributions. Employer contributions into the plan vest pro-rata after 3 years of vesting service and are fully vested thereafter. The Company has no additional pension benefits for its NEOs.
The Company does not have a nonqualified deferred compensation plan and the NEOs have not accrued any benefits or rights to payments other than the Astrotech 401(k) Plan and potential payments upon termination discussed below.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
As noted under Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Post-Termination Compensation, the Company has entered into employment agreements with Mr. Pickens and Mr. White that provide for payments and other benefits in connection with the officer’s termination for a qualifying event or circumstance and for enhanced payments in connection with such termination after a Change in Control (as defined in the applicable agreement). A description of the terms with respect to each of these types of terminations follows.

60


Termination Other Than After a Change in Control
The employment agreements provide for payments of certain benefits upon the termination of the employment of the NEO. The NEO’s rights upon termination of his or her employment depend upon the circumstances of the termination. Central to an understanding of the rights of each NEO under the employment agreements is an understanding of the definitions of “Cause” and “Good Reason” as those terms are used in those agreements. For purposes of the employment agreements, the Term of Employment may be terminated at any time by the Company upon any of the following:
Death of the NEO;
In the event of physical or mental disability where the NEO is unable to perform his/her duties;
For Cause or Material Breach where Cause is defined as conviction of certain crimes and/or felonies, and Material Breach is defined to include certain specified failures to perform duties or uphold fiduciary responsibilities; or
Otherwise at the discretion of the Company and subject to the termination obligations set forth in the employment agreement.
The information required by this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual MeetingNEO may terminate the Term of Stockholders and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.
Employment at any time upon any of the following:
Item 12. 
Security OwnershipUpon the death of Certain Beneficial Ownersthe NEO;
In the event of physical or mental disability where the NEO is unable to perform his/her duties;
Upon the Company’s material reduction in the NEO’s authority, perquisites, position, title or responsibilities or other actions that would give the NEO the right to resign for “Good Reason;” or
Otherwise at the discretion of the NEO and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.subject to the termination obligations set forth in the employment agreement.
The information requiredbenefits to be provided to the NEO in each of these situations are described in the tables below, which assume that the termination had taken place in fiscal 2011.
Termination after a Change in Control
A termination after a Change in Control is similar to the severance provisions described above, except that the NEO becomes entitled to benefits under these provisions only if his employment is terminated within twelve months following a Change in Control. A Change in Control for this purpose is defined to mean (i) the acquisition by any person or entity of the beneficial ownership of securities representing 50% or more of the outstanding securities of the Company having the right under ordinary circumstances to vote at an election of the Board of Directors of the Company; (ii) the date on which the majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company consists of persons other than directors nominated by a majority of the directors on the Board of Directors at the time of their election; and (iii) the consummation of certain types of transactions, including mergers and the sale or other disposition of all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets.
As with the severance provisions described above, the rights to which the NEO is entitled under the Change in Control provisions upon a termination of employment are dependent on the circumstances of the termination. The definitions of Cause and other reasons for termination are the same in this item will be containedtermination scenario as in a termination other than after a Change in Control.
Payment Obligations Under Employment Agreements Upon Termination of Employment of NEO
The following tables set forth Astrotech’s potential future payment obligations under the employment agreements under the circumstances specified upon a termination of the employment of our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual MeetingNEOs. Unless otherwise noted, the descriptions of Stockholdersthe payments below are applicable to all of the tables relating to potential payments upon termination or a Change in Control.
Equity Acceleration — The Company’s employment agreements include provisions to accelerate the vesting of outstanding equity awards upon termination, including termination pursuant to a Change in Control. The Compensation Committee oversees the Executive Stock Option Plan and is hereby incorporatedcharged with the responsibility of reviewing and granting exceptions to previously issued equity grants on a case by reference thereto.case basis.

61


Health Care Benefits — The employment agreements generally provide that, after resignation for Good Reason or termination without Cause, the Company will continue providing medical, dental, and vision coverage to the NEO and the NEO’s dependents at least equal to that which would have been provided if the NEO’s employment had not terminated, if such coverage continues to be available to the Company, until the earlier of (a) the date the NEO becomes eligible for any comparable medical benefits provided by any other employer or (b) the end date of an enumerated period following the NEO’s date of termination.
As termination benefits would be payable upon an event following June 30, 2010, the tables below reflect salary changes made by the Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2011.
Thomas B. Pickens, III
                     
          Resignation       
  Resignation  Termination  for Good       
  for Good  for Other  Reason or       
  Reason or  Than Good  Termination       
  Termination  Reason or  Without Cause       
Benefits and Payments Without  Termination  After Change-       
Upon Termination Cause ($)(1)  With Cause ($)  in-Control ($)(2)  Disability ($)  Death ($) 
                     
Compensation:
                    
                     
Base Salary  399,000      598,500   399,000   399,000 
                     
Bonus(3)
  99,750      149,625   99,750   99,750 
                     
Equity(4):
                    
                     
Restricted Stock  930,000      930,000   930,000   930,000 
                     
Spacetech Equity Awards  361,782      361,782   361,782   361,782 
                     
Benefits and Perquisites:
                    
                     
Post-Termination Health Care  19,557      29,336   19,557   19,557 
                     
Accrued Vacation Pay(5)
  38,365   38,365   38,365   38,365   38,365 
                
                     
Total:
  1,848,454   38,365   2,107,608   1,848,454   1,848,454 
(1)Pursuant to the employment agreement, this estimate assumes twelve months of base salary and benefits after termination.
(2)Provision on change in control provides for 18 months salary if terminated.
(3)Bonus calculated at 50% of estimated maximum bonus.
(4)Astrotech equity awards assumed exercise price of $1.24, which was the closing ASTC stock price as of June 30, 2010. Unvested options with a strike price above market value as of June 30, 2010 were not included in the calculation. Spacetech warrants were valued based on the Black Scholes Model and Spacetech restricted stock was based on a third party valuation.
(5)Assumes 5 weeks of accrued vacation upon termination (maximum contractual allowance).

62


Don M. White
                     
          Resignation       
  Resignation  Termination  for Good       
  for Good  for Other  Reason or       
  Reason or  Than Good  Termination       
Benefits and Termination  Reason or  Without Cause       
Payments Upon Without  Termination  After Change-       
Termination Cause ($)(1)  With Cause ($)  in-Control ($)(2)  Disability ($)  Death ($) 
                     
Compensation(3):
                    
                     
Base Salary  112,500      168,750   112,500   112,500 
                     
Bonus  56,250       84,375   56,250   56,250 
                     
Equity:
                    
                     
Restricted Stock(4)
  93,000      93,000   93,000   93,000 
                     
Options(5)
  34,125      34,125   34,125   34,125 
                     
Benefits and Perquisites:
                    
                     
Post-Termination Health Care  6,998      10,497   6,998   6,998 
                     
Life Insurance Premiums               
                     
Accrued Vacation Pay(6)
  21,635   21,635   21,635   21,635   21,635 
                
                     
Total:
  324,508   21,635   412,382   324,508   324,508 
(1)Pursuant to the employment agreement, this estimate assumes six months of base salary and benefits after termination.
(2)Provision on change in control provides for nine months salary if terminated.
(3)Bonus estimated at 50% of maximum bonus.
(4)Equity awards assumed exercise price of $1.24, which was the ASTC closing stock price as of June 30, 2010.
(5)Option awards assumed market price of $1.24, which was the ASTC closing stock price as of June 30, 2010. Unvested options with a strike price above market value as of June 30, 2010, were not included in the calculation.
(6)Assumes five weeks of accrued vacation upon termination (maximum contractual allowance).

63


Director Compensation
Overview
Astrotech’s director compensation program consists of cash-based as well as equity-based compensation. The Board of Directors recognizes that cash compensation is an integral part of the compensation program and has instituted a fixed and variable fee structure to provide compensation relative to the required time commitment of each director. The equity component of Astrotech’s director compensation program is designed to build an ownership stake in the Company while conveying an incentive to directors relative to the returns recognized by our Shareholders.
Cash-Based Compensation
Company directors, other than the Chairman of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Compensation Committee, receive an annual stipend of $30,000 paid upon the annual election of each non-employee director or upon joining the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual stipend of $40,000 and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an annual stipend of $35,000, recognizing the additional duties and responsibilities of those roles. In addition, each non-employee director receives a meeting fee of $3,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended in person and $1,000 for each such meeting attended by conference call.
Audit Committee members received $750 for attendance to meetings in person or by conference call, while the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee members received $500 for attendance to meetings in person or by conference call. All directors are reimbursed ordinary and reasonable expenses incurred in exercising their responsibilities in accordance with Travel and Entertainment Expense Reimbursement policy applicable to all employees of the Company.
Equity-Based Compensation
Under provisions adopted by the Board of Directors, each non-employee director receives 25,000 shares of restricted common stock issued upon his first election to the Board of Directors, subject to board discretion. Restricted stock and stock options granted under the plan vest 25% annually, beginning after one year and terminate in 10 years. Already vested shares do not expire upon termination of the director’s term on the Board of Directors.
Pension and Benefits
The non-employee directors are not eligible to participate in the Company’s benefits plans, including the 401(k) plan.
Indemnification Agreements
The Company is party to indemnification agreements with each of its directors that require the Company to indemnify the directors to the fullest extent permitted by Washington state law. The Company’s certificate of incorporation also requires the Company to indemnify both the directors and officers of the Company to the fullest extent permitted by Washington state law.

64


Fiscal Year 2010 Non-Employee Director Compensation Table
                     
      Restricted          
  Fees Earned or  Stock  Stock  All other    
  Paid in Cash  Awards  Options  compensation  Total 
Name ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($) 
                     
Mark Adams
  54,250            54,250 
                     
John A. Oliva
  60,500            60,500 
                     
William F. Readdy(1)
  46,000         12,708   58,708 
                     
Sha-Chelle Manning
  47,500            47,500 
                
                     
Total Total
  208,250         12,708   220,958 
                
(1)Mr. Readdy served as a consultant to Astrogenetix during fiscal year 2010. In November 2009, he received $12,708 in compensation for consulting fees and for the reimbursement of expenses incurred during his consulting-related international travel.

65


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table sets forth as of June 30, 2010, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s outstanding common stock held by (i) each person known by the Company to be a beneficial owner of more than five percent of any outstanding class of the Company’s capital stock, (ii) each of the Company’s directors, (iii) the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and four most highly compensated executive officers at the end of the Company’s last completed fiscal year, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise described below, each of the persons listed in the table below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned by each party.
                 
  Amount           
  and Nature           
  of  Shares      Percentage 
Name and Address of Beneficial Beneficial  Subject to      of 
Owners Ownership#  Options ($)  Total ($)  Class(1) 
                 
Certain Beneficial Owners
                
                 
SMH Capital Advisors, Inc.(2)
  3,228,192      3,228,192   17.0%
                 
Bruce & Co., Inc.(3)
  1,120,073      1,120,073   5.9%
                 
Astrium GmbH(4)
  1,099,245      1,099,245   5.8%
                 
Non-Employee Directors:
                
                 
Mark Adams(5)
  685,000   18,500   703,500   3.7%
                 
John A. Oliva(6)
  170,000   17,500   187,500   1.0%
                 
William F. Readdy(7)
  150,000   17,500   167,500   * 
                 
Sha-Chelle Manning(8)
  135,000      135,000   * 
                 
Named Executive Officers:
                
                 
Thomas B. Pickens, III(9)
  1,850,000   102,000   1,952,000   10.3%
                 
John M. Porter(10)
  300,000   100,000   400,000   2.1%
                 
Don M. White(11)
  77,000   22,600   99,600   * 
                 
James D. Royston(12)
  300,000   80,100   380,100   2.0%
             
 
All Directors and Named Executive Officers as a Group (8 persons)
  3,667,000   358,200   4,025,200   21.1%
*Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
#Includes unvested restricted stock grants.
(1)Calculated pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Rule 13d-3(d), shares not outstanding which are subject to options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage owned by a person, but not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage owned by any other person listed. As of June 30, 2010, we had 19,040,369 shares of common stock outstanding, including 2,180,205 of restricted stock with voting rights.
(2)Held by SMH Capital Advisors, Inc. in discretionary accounts for the benefit of its clients. This holder’s address is 4800 Overton Plaza, Suite 300, Ft. Worth, Texas 76109. Includes information from Form 13D filed by SMH Capital Advisors, Inc. on February 1, 2010.
(3)Bruce & Co., Inc., is the investment manager for Bruce Fund, Inc., a Maryland registered investment company with its principle business conducted at 20 North Wacker Dr., Suite 2414, Chicago, IL 60606. Includes information from Schedule 13G files by Bruce & Co., Inc. on December 31, 2009.
(4)Astrium GmbH’s address is Hünefeldstraße 1-5, Postfach 105909, D-28361 Bremen, Germany.
(5)Includes 172,500 shares of unvested restricted stock. On August 19, 2010, 53,334 restricted shares vest.
(6)Includes 157,500 shares of unvested restricted stock. On August 19, 2010, 48,334 restricted shares vest.
(7)Includes 122,500 shares of unvested restricted stock. On August 19, 2010, 36,667 restricted shares vest.
(8)Includes 128,750 shares of unvested restricted stock. On August 19, 2010, 36,667 restricted shares vest.
(9)Includes 750,000 shares of unvested restricted stock. On August 19, 2010, 250,000 restricted shares vest.
(10)Includes 300,000 shares of unvested restricted stock. On August 19, 2010, 100,000 restricted shares vest.
(11)Includes 75,000 shares of unvested restricted stock. On August 19, 2010, 25,000 restricted shares vest.
(12)Includes 150,000 shares of unvested restricted stock. James Royston, former President, was terminated in July 2010.

66


Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
                   
                (c) 
        (a)      Number of securities 
        Number of  (b)  remaining available 
        securities to be  Weighted-  at September 30, 
        issued upon  average exercise  2009 for future 
        exercise of  price of  issuance under 
        outstanding  outstanding  equity compensation 
        options,  options,  plans (excluding 
    Options  warrants and  warrants and  securities reflected in 
Plan Name Type Authorized  rights  rights  column (a) 
                   
Plans Previously Approved by Security Holders
                  
                   
1 The 1994 Plan(1)
 Common Stock Options Incentive or Non-Qualified  395,000   24,900  $24.53   0 
                   
2 Directors Stock Option Plan(2)
 Non-Qualified Common Stock Options  50,000   15,000  $12.64   30,000 
                   
3 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(3)
 Common Stock  150,000   0   N/A   1,735 
                   
4 2008 Stock Incentive Plan4)
 Common options, restricted stock, stock units and other equity awards  5,500,000   705,741  $0.40   329,389 
(1)Under the terms of the 1994 Plan, the number and price of the options granted to employees is determined by the Board of Directors and such options vest, in most cases, incrementally over a period of four years and expire no more than ten years after the date of grant. As of October 2009, additional shares cannot be granted from the 1994 Plan.
(2)Options under the Directors’ Plan vest after one year and expire seven years from the date of grant.
(3)The Employee Stock Purchase plan allowed eligible employees to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company at prices no less than 85% of the current market price. Company discontinued employee purchases of common stock under the plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007.
(4)The 2008 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the award of stock grants, restricted stock and stock options. The number and price of the awards granted to employees is determined by the Board of Directors and such options vest, in most cases, incrementally over a period of four years and expire no more than ten years after the date of grant. As of June 30, 2010, 2,180,205 shares of unvested restricted stock were outstanding.

67


Additional information on the Company’s equity compensation plan can be found under Item 11- Executive Compensation, above.
Item 13.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
Director Independence
The information requiredBoard of Directors has determined each of the following directors to be an “independent director” as such term is defined by this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual MeetingNasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2):
Mark E. Adams
John A. Oliva
William F. Readdy
Sha-Chelle Manning
The Board of StockholdersDirectors has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and is hereby incorporatedCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee during fiscal year 2010 meet the independence requirements applicable to those Committees prescribed by reference thereto.Nasdaq and SEC rules.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
In March 2010, the Astrotech Shareholders ratified the appointment of PMB Helin Donovan LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements. There were no discussions between the Company and PMB Helin Donovan LLP regarding the application of accounting principles to specific completed or contemplated transactions, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements. Furthermore, no written or oral advice was provided by PMB Helin Donovan LLP that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue. The Company has not consulted with PMB Helin Donovan LLP regarding any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to this item) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).

68


The following table presents fees paid or to be paid for professional audit services rendered by PMB Helin Donovan LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements during the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. PMB Helin Donovan LLP did not provide tax or other consulting services during 2010 or 2009.
         
  Fiscal 2010  Fiscal 2009 
         
Audit Fees1
 $191,000  $161,000 
Tax Fees
      
All Other Fees
      
       
Total All Fees
 $191,000  $161,000 
       
Item 14. 
Principal Accounting
(1)Audit Fees consisted of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and Services.review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy
The informationAudit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation for, and overseeing the work of PMB Helin Donovan LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accountants. In order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditors’ independence, the Audit Committee has established a policy requiring pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by independent registered public accountants. The policy provides for the general pre-approval of specific types of services and gives detailed guidance to management as to the specific audit, audit-related, and tax services that are eligible for general pre-approval. The policy requires specific pre-approval of the annual audit engagement, most statutory or subsidiary audits, and all permissible non-audit services for which no general pre-approval exists. For both audit and non-audit pre-approvals, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with applicable law and SEC rules and regulations concerning auditor independence.
The policy delegates to the Chairman the authority to grant certain specific pre-approvals; provided, however, that the Chairman is required to report the granting of any pre-approvals to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The policy prohibits the Audit Committee from delegating to management the Committee’s responsibility to pre-approve services performed by this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.the independent registered public accountants.

 

4869


PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as part of the report:
1. Financial Statements.
The following consolidated financial statements of Astrotech Corporation and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and related notes, are set forth herein as indicated below.

 

4970


       
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
       
(2)     
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
       
   2.1  Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   2.2  Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1, File No. 33- 97812, and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 1995)
       
(4)     
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, including Indentures
       
   4.1  Designation of Rights, Terms and Preferences of Series B Senior Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   4.2  Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG dated as of August 2, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 1999)
       
   4.3  Registration Rights Agreement between the Registrant and DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG dated as of August 5, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 1999)
      ��
   4.4  Indenture dated as of October 15, 1997 between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as Trustee, relating to the Registrant’s 8.0% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-43221) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 24, 1997)
       
   4.5  Designation of Right, Terms and Preferences of Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Astrotech Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2009).
       
   4.6  Rights Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2009, between Astrotech Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2009).
       
4.7Amendment One to Rights Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2010, between Astrotech Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-A/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2009).

71


  
Exhibit No.Description of Exhibit
(10)     
Material Contracts
       
   10.1  Letter Agreement dated August 15, 1995, by and between the Registrant and Mitsubishi Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 33-97812) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 1995)
       
   10.2  SPACEHAB, Incorporated 1995 Directors’ Stock Option Plan as amended and restated effective October 21, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 1997)
       
   10.3  Office Building Lease Agreement, dated October 6, 1993, between Astrotech and the Secretary of the Air Force (Lease number SPCVAN – 2-94-001) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 1997)
       
   10.4  SPACEHAB, Incorporated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective October 14, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.90 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 17, 1999)

50


       
Exhibit No.Description of Exhibit
   10.5  Agreement, dated September 30, 2004, between the Registrant and Dr. Shelley A. Harrison (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.6  Lease for property at 300 D Street, SW, Suite #814, Washington, DC, dated as of December 16, 1998, by and between the Registrant and The Washington Design Center, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.7  Sublease Agreement, dated as of July, 2002, between the Registrant and The Boeing Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.8  SPACEHAB, Incorporated 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit C of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 1997)

72


       
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
   10.9  Agreement between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. and McDonnell Douglas Corporation, dated January 7, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.103 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2000)
       
   10.10  Agreement between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Commercial Launch Services, Inc., dated January 24, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.104 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2000)
       
   10.11  Credit agreement dated as of August 30, 2001 by and between Astrotech Florida Holdings, Inc. and SouthTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.114 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2001)
       
   10.12  Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2003, between the Registrant and Michael E. Kearney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.119 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003)
       
   10.13  First amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of August 30, 2001 by and between Astrotech Florida Holdings, Inc. and SouthTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.122 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2004)
       
   10.14  Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2004, between the Registrant and Brian K. Harrington (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.123 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2004)
       
   10.15  50 Year Lease, dated as of February 1, 1991, between the Registrant and Canaveral Port Authority (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.16  Commercial Contract, dated as of March 3, 2005, between the Registrant and Tamir Silvers, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)

 

5173


       
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
       
   10.17  Lease Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2005, between the Registrant and R & H Investments, a California partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.18  Fixed Price Subcontract 889208 for Wideband Gapfiller Satellite Program Launch Site Payload Processing Facilities and Services, dated as of January 18, 2005, between Boeing Satellite Systems, Inc. and Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.19  Loan Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2005, between the Registrant and First American Bank, SSB (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.125 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005)
       
   10.20  Letter Contract No. GF80726B11, dated as of February 18, 2004, between the Registrant and Lockheed Martin Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.21  ISS Program Integration and Control Contract, between SPACEHAB Government Services, Inc. and ARES Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.22  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2000, between the Registrant and Astrium GmbH. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.23  Amendment No. 1 to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2000, between the Registrant and Astrium GmbH, dated July 3, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.24  Lease Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2001, between the Registrant and Astrium GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)

74


       
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
   10.25  Binding Term Sheet, dated as of December 19, 2001, between the Registrant and Astrium GmbH, amending the Lease Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2001, between the Registrant and Astrium GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.26  Lease Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2001, between the Registrant and Astrium GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.27  Agreement No. 48801 for Provision of Payload Processing Facilities and Support in Conjunction with Commercial Atlas Launches, between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Commercial Launch Services, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.28  Contract No. NNK04LA75C, dated as of July 2, 2004, between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. and John F. Kennedy Space Center, NASA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)

52


       
Exhibit No.Description of Exhibit
   10.29  Agreement and Statement of Work, dated as of April 25, 1996 and as amended by Amendment No. 3 as of December 6, 2002, between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. and Sea Launch Company, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.30  Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2005, between the Registrant and Michael E. Bain (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.31  Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2005, between the Registrant and E. Michael Chewning (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)

75


       
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
   10.32  Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of All Claims, dated as of May 25, 2005, among the Registrant and Lloyd’s of London, Goshawk Syndicate No. 102, Euclidian Syndicate No. 1243, Ascot Underwriting Ltd. Syndicate No. 1414, and R.J. Kiln Syndicate No. 510 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.33  Lease No. SPCVAN-2-94-0001, between the Secretary of the Air Force and Astrotech Space Operations, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.34  Strategic Collaboration Agreement, dated as of August 5, 1999, between the Registrant and DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.35  Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2001, between the Registrant and SouthTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.36  Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2001, between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. and SouthTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.37  Stock Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2001, between the Registrant and SouthTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.38  Stock Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2001, between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. and SouthTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.39  Assignment of CLIN 1 Rights, dated as of August 30, 2001, between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. and SouthTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)

76


       
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
   10.40  Termination Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Vladimir J. Fishel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)

53


       
Exhibit No.Description of Exhibit
   10.41  Memorandum of Understanding, dated as of June 8, 2005, between the Registrant and SMH Capital Advisors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.42  Space Media, Inc. Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-126772), and all amendments thereto, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005)
       
   10.43  First Amendment to Loan Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 of the Registrant’s Current Report on 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on November 10, 2005), effective September 30, 2005 between SPACEHAB, Incorporated (the “Borrower”) and Citibank Texas, N.A., formerly known as First American Bank, SSB (the “Lender”), as executed on November 10, 2005
       
   10.44  Second Amendment to Loan Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 of the Registrant’s Current Report on 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on March 3, 2006), dated February 11, 2006 between SPACEHAB, Incorporated (the “Borrower”) and Citibank Texas, N.A., formerly known as First American Bank, SSB (the “Lender”), as executed on February 28, 2006
       
   10.45  Separation Agreement and Mutual Release, dated as of December 15, 2006, between the Registrant and Michael E. Kearney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2006)
       
   10.46  Separation Agreement and Mutual Release, dated as of January 19, 2007, between the Registrant and Michael E. Bain (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2007)
       
   10.47  Separation Agreement and Mutual Release, dated as of January 19, 2007, between the Registrant and E. Michael Chewning (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2007)

77


       
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
   10.48  Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2007, between the Registrant and Michael J. Bowker (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2007)
       
   10.50  Loan Agreement dated as of February 6, 2008, between Astrotech Space Operations, Inc. (“the Borrower”) and Green Bank, N.A. (the “Lender”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2008)
       
   10.51  Employment Agreement, effective October 6, 2008 between SPACEHAB, Incorporated and Thomas B. Pickens, III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2008).
       
   10.52  Employment Agreement, effective October 6, 2008 between SPACEHAB, Incorporated and James D. Royston (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2008).
       
   10.53  Employment Agreement, effective October 6, 2008 between SPACEHAB, Incorporated and Brian K. Harrington (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2008).
       
   10.54  Employment Agreement, effective October 6, 2008 between SPACEHAB, Incorporated and Lance W. Lord (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2009).
       
  10.55Separation, Release and Consulting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, between the Registrant and Brian K. Harrington.
10.56
1st Detect Corporation Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement, dated January 19, 2010.
10.57
1st Detect Corporation Restricted Stock Agreement, dated January 19, 2010.
10.58Astrogenetix, Inc. Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement, dated January 19, 2010.
10.59Astrogenetix, Inc. Restricted Stock Agreement, dated January 19, 2010.
10.60
Texas Emerging Technology Fund Award and Security Agreement, effective March 30, 2010, between the State of Texas and 1st Detect Corporation.
10.61
1st Detect Corporation Investment Unit, effective March 30, 2010, between the State of Texas and 1st Detect Corporation.
10.62Third Amendment, dated February 6, 2010, to the original loan agreement between the Registrant and Greebank, N.A., signed on February 6, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2010).
10.63Separation Agreement, dated August 19, 2010, between the Registrant and James D. Royston.

 

5478


       
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
       
(16)     
Letter Regarding Change in Certifying Accountant
       
   16.1  Letter from Grant Thornton LLP regarding change in certifying accountant, dated January 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007)
       
(21)     
Astrotech Corporation and Subsidiaries – Subsidiaries of the Registrant
       
(23)     
Consents of Experts and Counsel
       
   23.1  Consent of PMB Helin Donovan LLP
       
   23.2  Consent of Grant Thornton LLP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 23.2 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2008)
       
(31)     
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
       
   31.1  Certification of Thomas B. Pickens, III, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
       
   31.2  Certification of John M. Porter, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
       
(32)     
Section 1350 Certifications
       
   32.1  Certification of Thomas B. Pickens, III, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
       
   32.2  Certification of John M. Porter, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

 

5579


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
     
 Astrotech Corporation
 
Astrotech Corporation
By:  /s/ Thomas B. Pickens, III  
  Thomas B. Pickens, III  
  By:/s/ Thomas B. Pickens, IIIChief Executive Officer  
 
Date: August 30, 2010
Thomas B. Pickens, III
Chief Executive Officer
Date: September 28, 2009     
   
 By:  /s/ John M. Porter  
  By:/s/ John M. Porter  
  
John M. Porter
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer  
 Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer
Date: September 28, 2009August 30, 2010

80


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of this registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
     
/s/ Thomas B. Pickens, III
Chairman of the Board andSeptember 28, 2009
 
Thomas B. Pickens, III
 Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
 August 30, 2010
     
/s/ Mark Adams
DirectorSeptember 28, 2009
 
Mark Adams
 Director  August 30, 2010
     
/s/ Lance W. LordSha-Chelle Manning
Sha-Chelle Manning
 Director September 28, 2009August 30, 2010
/s/ John A. Oliva
 
Lance W. LordJohn A. Oliva
 Director  August 30, 2010
     
/s/ R. Scott NieboerWilliam F. Readdy
William F. Readdy
 Director September 28, 2009
R. Scott Nieboer
August 30, 2010
     
/s/ Sha-Chelle ManningDirectorSeptember 28, 2009
Sha-Chelle Manning
/s/ John A. OlivaDirectorSeptember 28, 2009
John A. Oliva
/s/ William F. ReaddyDirectorSeptember 28, 2009
William F. Readdy
/s/ John M. PorterSenior Vice President,September 28, 2009
 
John M. Porter
 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer August 30, 2010

 

5681


EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit  
Index Description
 21  Subsidiaries
10.55Separation, Release and Consulting Agreement, dated June 4, 2009, between the Registrant and Brian K. Harrington.
10.56
1st Detect Corporation Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement, dated January 19, 2010.
10.57
1st Detect Corporation Restricted Stock Agreement, dated January 19, 2010.
10.58Astrogenetix, Inc. Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement, dated January 19, 2010.
10.59Astrogenetix, Inc. Restricted Stock Agreement, dated January 19, 2010.
10.60
Texas Emerging Technology Fund Award and Security Agreement, effective March 30, 2010, between the State of Texas and 1st Detect Corporation.
10.61
1st Detect Corporation Investment Unit, effective March 30, 2010, between the State of Texas and 1st Detect Corporation.
10.63Separation Agreement, dated August 19, 2010, between the Registrant and James D. Royston.
     
 23.1  Consent of PMB Helin Donovan LLP
     
 31.1  Certification of Thomas B. Pickens, III, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
     
 31.2  Certification of John M. Porter, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
     
 32.1  Certification of Thomas B. Pickens, III, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
     
 32.2  Certification of John M. Porter, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

 

5782