UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
Form 10-K
 
   
þ
 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20092010
OR
o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
001-32410
(Commission File Number)
001-32410
 
CELANESE CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
   
Delaware98-0420726

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 98-0420726
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1601 West LBJ Freeway, Dallas, TX
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 75234-6034
(Zip Code)
 
(972) 443-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
 
   
  Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class
 
on Which Registered
Series A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share
New York Stock Exchange
4.25% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (liquidation preference $25.00 per share)
 New York Stock Exchange
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act
None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ    No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ    No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer  þAccelerated filer  oNon-accelerated filer  oSmaller reporting company  o
                                           (Do(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12-b212b-2 of the Act).  Yes o    No þ
 
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Series A Common Stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 20092010 (the last business day of the registrants’ most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $3,393,984,918.$3,865,760,182.
 
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Series A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, as of February 5, 20104, 2011 was 145,861,703.155,976,657.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
Certain portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20102011 annual meeting of shareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference into Part III.
 


 

 
CELANESE CORPORATION

Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009

2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
       
    Page
 
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 3
 
PART I
Item 1.  3
 
Item 1A.  2018
 
Item 1B.  3128
 
Item 2.  3229
 
Item 3.  3431
 
Item 4. 34
  3134
 
PART II
Item 5.  3732
 
Item 6.  4135
 
Item 7.  4337
 
Item 7A.  6269
Item 8.8  7264
 
Item 9.  6673
Item 9A.9A  7366
 
Item 9B.  7668
 
PART III
Item 10.  7668
 
Item 11.  7668
 
Item 12.  7668
 
Item 13.  7668
 
Item 14.  7668
 
PART IV
Item 15.  77
68Signatures 78
 EX-10.5.BEX-3.1
EX-3.3
EX-10.8
EX-10.8.A
EX-10.8.D
 EX-10.13
 EX-10.19EX-10.29
EX-10.30
 EX-21.1
 EX-23.1
EX-23.2
EX-23.3
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-99.1
EX-99.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT


2


 
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
 
Certain statements in this Annual Report onForm 10-K (“Annual Report”) or in other materials we have filed or will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be madeand incorporated herein by us,reference, are forward-looking in nature as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate to matters of a strictly factual or historical nature and generally discuss or relate to forecasts, estimates or other expectations regarding future events. Generally, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “may,” “can,” “could,” “might,” “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, including statements that relate to, such matters as planned and expected capacity increases and utilization; anticipated capital spending; environmental matters; legal proceedings; exposure to, and effects of hedging of, raw material and energy costs and foreign currencies; global and regional economic, political, and business conditions; expectations, strategies, and plans for individual assets and products, business segments, as well as for the whole Company; cash requirements and uses of available cash; financing plans; pension expenses and funding; anticipated restructuring, divestiture, and consolidation activities; cost reduction and control efforts and targets and integration of acquired businesses. From time to time, forward-looking statements also are included in our other periodic reports onForms 10-Q and8-K, in our press releases and presentations, on our web site and in other material released to the public.
 
Forward-looking statements are not historical facts or guarantees of future performance but instead represent only our beliefs at the time the statements were made regarding future events, which are subject to significant risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside of our control and certain of which are listed above. Any or all of the forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report and in any other reports, presentations or public statements madematerials incorporated by usreference herein may turn out to be materially inaccurate. This can occur as a result of incorrect assumptions, in some cases based upon internal estimates and analyses of current market conditions and trends, management plans and strategies, economic conditions, or as a consequence of known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many of the risks and uncertainties mentioned in this Annual Report, such as those discussed inItem 1A. Risk Factors, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Forward-Looking Statements May Prove Inaccurate, or in another report or public statement made by us, will be important in determining whether these forward-looking statements prove to be accurate. Consequently, neither our stockholdersshareholders nor any other person should place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements and should recognize that actual results may differ materially from those anticipated by us.
 
All forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report are made as of the date hereof, and the risk that actual results will differ materially from expectations expressed in this Annual Report will increase with the passage of time. We undertake no obligation, and disclaim any duty, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in our expectations or otherwise. However, we may make further disclosures regarding future events, trends and uncertainties in our subsequent reports onForms 10-K,10-Q and8-K to the extent required under the Exchange Act. The above cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possible inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business include factors we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Other factors beyond those listed above or inItem 3. Legal Proceedingsbelow, including factors unknown to us and factors known to us which we have not determined to be material, could also adversely affect us.
 
Item 1. Business
 
Basis of Presentation
 
In this Annual Report onForm 10-K, the term “Celanese” refers to Celanese Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and not its subsidiaries. The terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Celanese and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The term “Celanese US” refers to ourthe Company’s subsidiary, Celanese US Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly known as BCP Crystal US Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation, and not its subsidiaries. The term “Purchaser” refers to our subsidiary, Celanese Europe Holding GmbH & Co. KG, formerly known as BCP Crystal Acquisition GmbH & Co. KG, a German limited partnership, and not its subsidiaries, except where otherwise indicated.


3


Overview
 
Celanese Corporation was formed in 2004 when affiliates of The Blackstone Group purchased 84% of the ordinary shares of Celanese GmbH, formerly known as Celanese AG, a diversified German chemical company. Celanese


3


Corporation was incorporated in 2005 under the laws of the state of Delaware and its shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CE”. During the period from 2005 through 2007, Celanese Corporation purchasedacquired the remaining 16% interest in Celanese GmbH.
 
We are a leading, global integrated producer of chemicalstechnology and advanced materials.specialty materials company. We are one of the world’s largest producers of acetyl products, which are intermediate chemicals, for nearly all major industries, as well as a leading global producer of high performance engineered polymers that are used in a variety of high-value end-use applications. As ana recognized innovator in the chemicals industry, leader, we hold geographically balancedengineer and manufacture a wide variety of products essential to everyday living. Our broad product portfolio serves a diverse set of end-use applications including paints and coatings, textiles, automotive applications, consumer and medical applications, performance industrial applications, filter media, paper and packaging, chemical additives, construction, consumer and industrial adhesives, and food and beverage applications. Our products enjoy leading global positions due to our large global production capacity, operating efficiencies, proprietary production technology and participate in diversified, end-use markets. Our operations are primarily located in North America, Europe and Asia. We combine a demonstrated track record of execution, strong performance built on our principles and objectives, and a clear focus on growth, productivity and value creation.competitive cost structures.
 
Our large and diverse global customer base primarily consists of major companies in a broad array of industries. For the year ended December 31, 2009, approximately 27%We hold geographically balanced global positions and participate in diversified end-use applications. We combine a demonstrated track record of execution, strong performance built on shared principles and objectives, and a clear focus on growth and value creation. Known for operational excellence and execution of our net sales werebusiness strategies, we deliver value to customers located in North America, 42% to customers in Europe and Africa, 28% to customers in Asia-Pacific and 3% to customers in South America. We have property, plant and equipment inaround the United States of $634 million and outside the United States of $2,163 million.globe withbest-in-class technologies.
 
Industry
 
This Annual Report onForm 10-K includes industry data obtained from industry publications and surveys as well as our own internal company surveys. Third-party industry publications, surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. The statements regarding Celanese’s marketindustry position in this document are based on information derived from, among others, the2009 Stanford Research Institute International Chemical Economics Handbook.


4


Business Segment Overview
 
We operate principally through four business segments: Advanced Engineered Materials, Consumer Specialties, Industrial Specialties and Acetyl Intermediates. ForSee Note 25 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further details on our business segments, see Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements.segments. The table below illustrates each business segment’s net sales to external customers for the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, as well as each business segment’s major products andend-use markets. applications.
 


4


         
  Advanced
      
  Engineered Materials Consumer Specialties Industrial Specialties Acetyl Intermediates
 
20092010 Net Sales(1)
 $8081,109 million $1,0781,089 million
$1,036 million $974 million$2,2202,682 million
         
Key Products
 
•   Polyacetal products (“POM”)

•   Ultra-high molecular
weight polyethylene (“GUR®”)

•   Liquid crystal polymers (“LCP”)

•   Polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”)

•   Polybutylene
terephthalate (“PBT”)

•   Polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”)

•   Long fiberLong-fiber reinforced thermoplastics (“LFRT”LFT”)
 
•   Acetate tow

•   Acetate flake

•   Sunett® sweetener

•   Sorbates
 
•   Polyvinyl alcohol (“PVOH”)(2)

•   Conventional emulsions

•   Vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions (“VAE”)

•   Low-density
polyethylene resins (“LDPE”)

•   Ethylene vinyl acetate (“EVA”) resins and compounds
 •   Acetic acid

•   Vinyl acetate
monomer (“VAM”)

•   Acetic anhydride

•   Acetaldehyde

•   Ethyl acetate

•   Butyl acetate

•   Formaldehyde
Major End-Use
MarketsApplications
 •   Fuel system components

•   Conveyor belts

•   Battery separators

•   Electronics

•   Seat belt mechanisms

•   Other automotiveAutomotive safety systems

•   Appliances

•   Electronics

•   Filtrations

•   Coatings

•   Medical Devices

•   Telecommunications
 •   Filter products

•   Beverages

•   Confections

•   Baked goods

•   Pharmaceuticals
 •   Photovoltaic cell systems

•   Paints

•   Coatings

•   Adhesives

•   Building products

•   Glass fibers

•   Textiles

•   Paper finishing

•   Flexible packaging

•   Lamination products

•   Medical tubing

•   Automotive parts
 •   Paints

•   Coatings

•   Adhesives

•   Lubricants

•   Detergents

•   Pharmaceuticals

•   Films

•   Textiles

•   Inks

•   Plasticizers

•   Esters

•   Solvents
 
(1)Consolidated net sales of $5,082$5,918 million for the year ended December 31, 20092010 also includes $2 million in net sales from Other Activities, which is attributable to our captive insurance companies. Net sales for Acetyl Intermediates and Consumer Specialties exclude inter-segment sales of $389$400 million combinedand $9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009.
(2)The PVOH business was sold July 1, 2009.2010.

5


Competitive Strengths
 
We benefit from a number of competitive strengths, including the following:
 
• Leading Positions
 
We believehold a leading position in the major product industries that we are a leading global integrated producer of acetyl, acetate and vinyl emulsion products. Advanced Engineered Materials and our strategic affiliates, Polyplastics Co., Ltd. (“Polyplastics”) and Korea Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd. (“KEPCO”), are leading producers and suppliers of engineered polymers in North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.serve. Our leadership positions are based on our large share of global production capacity, operating efficiencies, proprietary production technology and competitive cost structures in our major product lines.
•  Advanced Engineered Materials—Our Advanced Engineered Materials business is a leading participant in the global technical polymers industry. Approximately 70% of its business is specification-based, which drives sustainable value for its performance polymers. Advanced Engineered Materials maintains its competitive advantage with high-quality products and services, as well as its technical knowledge in application development and product technology. Its substantial strategic affiliates also enhance its global reach.
•  Consumer Specialties—Our Acetate Products business is a leading producer of acetate tow, used in the production of filter products. We also hold approximately 30% ownership interests in three separate Acetate Products production entities in China. Our Nutrinova business is a leading international supplier of the high intensity sweetener Sunett® (acesulfame potassium) for the food, beverage and pharmaceutical industries and is also one of the world’s largest producers of sorbates used in food preservatives.
•  Industrial Specialties—Our Industrial Specialties business is active in every major global industrial sector and has manufacturing plants across North America, Europe and Asia. Our expertise in vinyl-based technology enables us to drive value into our customers’ products. We are a leading global producer of VAE emulsions and a recognized authority on low VOC (volatile organic compound) technology.
•  Acetyl Intermediates—As an industry leader, our Acetyl Intermediates business has built on its leading technology, an advantaged feedstock position, and attractive industry structure to drive growth. With decades of experience, advanced proprietary process technology and favorable production costs, we are a leading global producer of acetic acid and VAM. In 2007, we strengthened our global positions with the opening of an integrated chemical complex in Nanjing, China, that brings world-class scale to one site for the production of acetic acid, VAM, acetic anhydride and other products.
Highly Diversified Products and End-Use Applications
We offer our customers a broad range of products in a wide variety of end-use applications including paints and coatings, textiles, automotive applications, consumer and medical applications, performance industrial applications, filter media, paper and packaging, chemical additives, construction, consumer and industrial adhesives, and food and beverage applications. Our net sales are also geographically balanced across the global regions. For the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately 28% of our net sales were to customers located in North America, 40% to customers in Europe and Africa, 29% to customers in Asia-Pacific and 3% to customers in South America. We have property, plant and equipment, net in the United States of $650 million and outside the United States of $2,367 million.
Attractive Near-Term Growth Prospects
We continue to make significant progress toward our stated growth objectives and aim to increase the earnings power of our portfolio over the near term. We intend to continue to grow the earnings power of the business through four key strategic levers:
•  Geographic Growth—We continue to accelerate growth in emerging regions, including Asia. Our integrated chemical complex in Nanjing, China, the largest integrated acetyls complex in the world, serves as a foundation for our expansion in Asia and supports the region’s increasing demand. Our strategic affiliates will further accelerate this growth.


56


•  Innovation—We expect innovation through new product and application development to enhance revenue growth, particularly in our Advanced Engineered Materials and Industrial Specialties businesses. Advanced Engineered Materials has industry-leading polymer technologies used in high performance applications and Industrial Specialties provides attractive economic solutions for environmentally-sensitive low-VOC applications, including paints, coatings and adhesives. Innovation and application development strategies in these businesses bolster the company’s operating earnings.
•  Productivity—We have a track record of executing on our productivity commitments. Energy reduction, business process excellence, manufacturing optimization and other productivity initiatives will enable us to offset fixed cost inflation, improve our operating performance and fuel reinvestment in our businesses. We expect to realize our productivity commitments for fixed cost reductions in the near term.
•  Portfolio Enhancements—We continuously pursue opportunities that meet our investment criteria and shift our current product base towards technology-focused and specialty materials businesses. In December 2009, we completed the acquisition of the LFT business of FACT GmbH (Future Advanced Composites Technology). We also acquired two product lines, Zenite® LCP and Thermx® polycyclohexylene-dimethylene terephthalate (“PCT”), from DuPont Performance Polymers in May 2010. Through our 25%-owned strategic venture in Saudi Arabia, known as National Methanol Company or “Ibn Sina,” we are also investing in a new POM facility in Saudi Arabia to strengthen our specialty materials portfolio.
• Strategic Affiliates
Our equity and cost investments represent an important component of our strategy for accelerated growth and expansion of our global reach. These investments have provided our core businesses with a large presence in Asia and the Middle East, and have also contributed significantly to earnings and cash flow. These ventures, some of which date back as far as the 1960s, have sizeable operations and are significant within their industries.
Proprietary Production Technology and Operating Expertise
 
Our production of acetyl products employs industry-leading proprietary and licensed technologies, including our proprietary AOPlus®2 and AOPlustm®2 technologies for the production of acetic acid and VAntagetm® and VAntage Plustm vinyl acetate monomer technology. AOPlus®2 builds on the industry benchmark with the ability to increase acetic acid production from our current capacity of 1.2 million tons per reactor per year to approximately 1.5 million tons per reactor per year at a fraction of the cost of a new facility. This technology is applicable to existing and new greenfield units. AOPlustm® enables increased raw material efficiencies, lower operating costs and the ability to expand plant capacity with minimal investment. VAntagetm® and VAntage Plustm enable significant increases in production efficiencies, lower operating costs and increases in capacity at ten to fifteen percent of the cost of building a new plant.
 
• Low Cost Producer
 
Our competitive cost structures are based on production and purchasing economies of scale, vertical integration, technical expertise and the use of advanced technologies.
 
• Global Reach
 
We own or lease thirty-twothirty production facilities throughout the world, of which fivethree sites are no longer operating as of December 31, 2009.2010. We participate in strategic ventures which operate thirteeneight additional facilities. Our infrastructure of manufacturing plants, terminals, warehouses and sales offices provides us with a competitive advantage in anticipating and meeting the needs of our global and local customers in well-established and growing markets,industries, while our geographic diversity reduces the potential impact of volatility in any individual country or region. We have a strong, growing presence in Asia, particularly in China, and we have a defined strategy to continue this growth. For moreSee Note 25 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our financial information with respect to our geographic areas, see Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements.areas.


7


• Strategic Investments
Our strategic investments have enabled us to gain access, minimize costs and accelerate growth in new markets, while also generating significant cash flow and earnings. Our equity investments and cost investments represent an important component of our growth strategy. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements andItem 1. Business — Investmentsfor additional information on our equity and cost investments.
• Diversified Products and End-Use Markets
We offer our customers a broad range of products in a wide variety of end-use markets. Our diversified end-use markets include paints and coatings, textiles, automotive applications, consumer and medical applications, performance industrial applications, filter media, paper and packaging, chemical additives, construction, consumer and industrial adhesives, and food and beverage applications. This product and market diversity reduces the potential impact of volatility in any individual segment.
Business Strategies
 
Our strategic foundation is based on the following fourthree pillars which are focused on increasing operating cash flows, improving profitability, delivering high return on investments and increasing shareholder value:
 
Business Focus
 
We focus on businesses where we have a clear, sustainable, and proven competitive advantage. We continue to optimize our business portfolio in order to achieve market,industry, cost and technology leadership while expanding our product mix into higher value-added products.


6


 
• InvestmentStrategic Results
 
We build on advantaged positions that optimize ourhave created a unique portfolio of products. In ordertechnology and specialty materials businesses that will enable Celanese to improve our competitive advantage, we have invested in: our core group of businesses through acquisitions;deliver sustainable results that yield premier financial performance. Our advantaged portfolio is well positioned for sustained earnings growth, in Asia bolstered by our integrated chemical complex in Nanjing, China;relatively higher margins, modest earnings volatility and new applications of our advanced engineered polymers products.high capital return.
 
• GrowthStrategic Levers
 
We aggressively align withwill deliver earnings growth, further strengthen our customersbusinesses and their end-use markets to capture growth. We are quickly expanding in Asia, the fastest-growing region in the world, in order to meet increasing demand for our products. As partincrease shareholder value through premier execution of our strategy, we also continue to develop new productsfour key strategic earnings growth levers: Geographic Growth, Innovation, Productivity and industry-leading production technologies that deliver value-added solutions for our customers.Portfolio Enhancements.
 
• Redeployment
We divest non-core assets and revitalize underperforming businesses. We have divested or exited businesses where we no longer maintain a competitive advantage. We also continue to make key strategic decisions to revitalize businesses that have significant potential for improved performance and enhanced efficiency.
Underlying all of these strategies is a culture of execution and productivity. We continually seek ways to reduce costs, increase productivity and improve process technology. Our commitment to operational excellence is an integral part of our strategy to maintain our cost advantage and productivity leadership.
Business Segments
 
Advanced Engineered Materials
 
Our Advanced Engineered Materials segment develops, produces and supplies a broad portfolio of high performance technicalspecialty polymers for application in automotive, medical and electronics products, as well as other consumer and industrial applications. Together with our strategic affiliates, we are a leading participant in the global technicalspecialty polymers industry. The primary products of Advanced Engineered Materials are POM, PPS, LFRT, PBT, PET,LFT, GUR® and LCP. POM, PPS, LFRT, PBT and PETLFT are used in a broad range of products including automotive components, medical devices, electronics, appliances and industrial applications. GUR® is used in battery separators, conveyor belts, filtration equipment, coatings and medical devices. Primary end marketsuses for LCP are electrical and electronics.
 
Advanced Engineered Materials’ technicalspecialty polymers have chemical and physical properties enabling them, among other things, to withstand extremeelevated temperatures, resist adverse chemical reactionsinteractions with solvents and withstand fracturing or stretching.deformation. These products are used in a wide range of performance-demanding applications in the automotive and electronics sectors as well as in other consumer and industrial goods.
 
Advanced Engineered Materials works in concert with its customers to enable innovations and develop new or enhanced products. Advanced Engineered Materials focuses its efforts on developing new markets and applications for its product lines, often developingcreating custom formulations to satisfy the technical and processing requirements of a customer’s applications. For example, Advanced Engineered Materials has collaborated with fuel system suppliers to develop an acetal copolymer with the chemical and impact resistance necessary to withstand exposure to hot diesel fuels in the new generation of common rail diesel engines. The product can also be used in automotive fuel sender units where it remains stable at the high operating temperatures present in direct-injection diesel engines and can meet the requirements of the new generation of bio fuels.
Advanced Engineered Materials’ customer base consists primarily of a large number of plastic molders and component suppliers, which typically supply original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). Advanced Engineered Materials works with these molders and component suppliers as well as directly with the OEMs to develop and improve specialized applications and systems.biofuels.
 
Prices for most of these products, particularly specialized product grades for targeted applications, generally reflect the value added in complex polymer chemistry, precision formulation and compounding, and the extensive


7


application development services provided. These specialized products are not typically susceptible to cyclical swings in pricing.


8


• Key Products
 
• Key ProductsPOM.
 Polyacetal, as POM is commonly known in the chemical industry, is sold by Advanced Engineered Materials under the trademark Hostaform® in all regions but North America, where it is sold under the trademark Celcon®. Polyplastics and KEPCO are leading suppliers of POM and other engineering resins in the Asia-Pacific region. POM is used for mechanical parts, including door locks and seat belt mechanisms, in automotive applications and in electrical, consumermedical and medicalconsumer applications such as drug delivery systems and gears for large appliances. POM and other engineering resins are manufactured in the Asia-Pacific region by Polyplastics Co., Ltd., our45%-owned strategic venture (“Polyplastics”), and Korea Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd., our 50%-owned strategic venture (“KEPCO”).
 
The primary raw material for POM is formaldehyde, which is manufactured from methanol. Advanced Engineered Materials currently purchases formaldehyde in the United States from our Acetyl Intermediates segment and, in Europe, manufactures formaldehyde from purchased methanol.
 
Ibn Sina produces methanol and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (“MTBE”). We recently announced the extension of our Ibn Sina strategic venture, including the construction of a new 50,000 ton POM manufacturing facility in Saudi Arabia. Engineering on the facility began in 2010.
LFT. Celstran® and Compel® are long-fiber reinforced thermoplastics, which impart extra strength and stiffness, making them more suitable for larger parts than conventional thermoplastics and both products are used in automotive, transportation and industrial applications.
GUR®. A highly engineered material designed for heavy-duty industrial and automotive applications, GUR® is an engineered material used in heavy-duty automotive anditems such as industrial applications such asconveyor belts, car battery separator panels and industrial conveyor belts, as well as in specialty medical and consumer applications, such as sports equipmentprostheses and prostheses.equipment. GUR® micro powder grades are used for high-performance filters, membranes, diagnostic devices, coatings and additives for thermoplastics and elastomers. GUR® fibers are also used in protective ballistic applications.
 
Celstran® and Compel® are long fiber reinforced thermoplastics, which impart extra strength and stiffness, making them more suitable for larger parts than conventional thermoplastics and are used in automotive, transportation and industrial applications.
PolyestersPolyesters. Our products also include certain polyesters such as Celanex® PBT, Celanex® PET, Vandar®, a series of PBT-polyester blends and Riteflex®, a thermoplastic polyester elastomer, are used in a wide variety of automotive, electrical and consumer applications, including ignition system parts, radiator grilles, electrical switches, appliance and sensor housings, light emitting diodes (“LEDs”) and technical fibers. Raw materials for polyesters vary. Base monomers, such as dimethyl terephthalate and purified terephthalic acid (“PTA”), are widely available with pricing dependent on broader polyester fiber and packaging resins marketindustry conditions. Smaller volume specialty co-monomers for these products are typically supplied to us by a limited number of companies.
 
Liquid crystal polymers, such as Vectra® and Zenite®, are primarily used in electrical and electronics applications and for precision parts with thin walls and complex shapes or on high-heatas well as in high heat cookware applications.
 
Fortron®, a PPS product, is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications, especially those requiring heatand/or chemical resistance, including fuel system parts, radiator pipes and halogen lamp housings, often replacing metal. Other possible application fields include non-woven filtration devices such asused in coal fired power plants. Fortron® is manufactured by Fortron Industries LLC (“Fortron”), Advanced Engineered Materials’our 50% owned-owned strategic venture with Kureha Corporation of Japan.
 
• Facilities
• Facilities
 
Advanced Engineered Materials has polymerization, compounding and research and technology centers in Germany, Brazil, China and the United States.


89


• Geographic Regions
• Geographic Regions
 
The following table illustrates the destination of the net sales of the Advanced Engineered Materials segment by geographic region.
 
Net Sales to External Customers by Destination — Advanced Engineered Materials
 
                                                
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008 
   % of
   % of
   % of
    % of
   % of
   % of
 
 $ Segment $ Segment $ Segment  $ Segment $ Segment $ Segment 
   (In millions, except percentages)      (In millions, except percentages)   
North America    285   35%  365   34%  388   38% ��    384        34        285        35        365        34  
Europe and Africa  403   50%  553   52%  517   50%  530    48    403    50    553    52  
Asia-Pacific  82   10%  106   10%  88   8%  152    14    82    10    106    10  
South America  38   5%  37   4%  37   4%  43       38       37     
              
Total  808         1,061         1,030       1,109        808        1,061      
              
• Customers
 
Advanced Engineered Materials’ sales in Asia are made directly and through distributors including its strategic affiliates. Polyplastics, KEPCO and Fortron are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and therefore not included in Advanced Engineered Materials’ consolidated net sales. If Advanced Engineered Materials’ portion of the sales made by these strategic affiliates were included in the table above, the percentage of sales sold in Asia-Pacific would be substantially higher. A number of Advanced Engineered Materials’ POM customers, particularly in the appliance, electrical components and certain sections of the electronics/telecommunications fields, have moved tooling and molding operations to Asia, particularly southern China. In addition to our Advanced Engineered Materials affiliates, we directly service Asian demand by offering our customers global solutions.
 
Advanced Engineered Materials’ principal customers are consumer product manufacturers and suppliers to the automotive industry. These customers primarily produce engineered products, and Advanced Engineered Materials collaborates with its customers to assist in developing and improving specialized applications and systems. Advanced Engineered Materials has long-standing relationships with most of its major customers, but also uses distributors for its major products, as well as a number of electronic marketplaces to reach a larger customer base. For most of Advanced Engineered Materials’ products, contracts with customers typically have a term of one to two years.
 
• Competition
• Competition
 
Advanced Engineered Materials’ principal competitors include BASF AG (“BASF”), E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”), DSM N.V., SabicSABIC Innovative Plastics and Solvay S.A. SmallerOther regional competitors include Asahi Kasei Corporation, Mitsubishi Gas Chemicals, Inc., Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, L.P., Braskem S.A., Lanxess AG, Teijin, Sumitomo, Inc. and Toray Industries Inc.
 
Consumer Specialties
 
The Consumer Specialties segment consists of our Acetate Products and Nutrinova businesses. Our Acetate Products business primarily produces and supplies acetate tow, which is used in the production of filter products. We also produce acetate flake which is processed into acetate fiber in the form of a tow band. Our Nutrinova business produces and sells Sunett®, a high intensity sweetener, and food protection ingredients, such as sorbates and sorbic acid, for the food, beverage and pharmaceutical industries.


10


• Key Products
 
• Key ProductsAcetate flake and tow.
 According to the 2009 Stanford Research Institute International Chemical Economics Handbook, as of 2008 we were the world’s leading producer of acetate tow (inclusive of the production of our China ventures). Acetate tow is used primarily in cigarette filters. WeTo produce acetate tow, we first produce acetate flake by processing wood pulp with acetic acid and acetic anhydride. We purchase woodWood pulp that is madecomes from reforested trees and is purchased externally from major suppliersa variety of sources and produce acetic anhydride internally.is an intermediate chemical we produce internally from acetic acid. The acetate flake is then further processed into acetate fiber in the form of a tow band.


9


According to the 2009 Stanford Research Institute International Chemical Economics Handbook, as of 2008 we are the world’s leading producer of acetate tow, including production of our China ventures.
 
Sales of acetate tow amounted to approximately 16%15%, 12%16% and 11%12% of our consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively.
 
We have an approximate 30% interest in three manufacturing China ventures which are accounted for as cost method investments (see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements)in China that produce acetate flake and tow. Our partner in each of the ventures is the Chinese state-owned tobacco entity, China National Tobacco Corporation. In addition to being our venture partner, China National Tobacco accounted for approximately 12% of our 20092010 acetate tow sales were sold directly to China, the largest consuming country for acetate tow.sales.
 
Sunett® sweetener.Acesulfame potassium, a high intensity sweetener marketed under the trademark Sunett®, is used in a variety of beverages, confections and dairy products throughout the world. Sunett® pricingsweetener is known for targeted applications reflects the value added by Nutrinova, throughits consistent product quality and reliable supply. Nutrinova’s strategy is to be the most reliable and highest quality producer of this product, to develop new product applications and to expand into new markets.regions.
 
Nutrinova’s food ingredients business consists of the production and sale of foodFood protection ingredients, such as sorbic acid and sorbates, and high intensity sweeteners worldwide.ingredients. Nutrinova’s food protection ingredients are mainly used in foods, beverages and personal care products. The primary raw materials for these products are ketene and crotonaldehyde. Sorbates pricing is extremely sensitive to demand and industry capacity and is not necessarily dependent on the prices of raw materials.
 
•  Facilities
• Facilities
 
Acetate Products has production sites in the United States, Mexico, the United Kingdom and Belgium, and participates in three manufacturing ventures in China. During 2010, we announced the shutdown of our acetate tow and flake manufacturing operations at our Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom site. We will continue to maintain our Clarifoil manufacturing operations at this site.
 
Nutrinova has a production facility in Germany, as well as sales and distribution facilities in all major world markets.regions of the world.


11


•  Geographic Regions
• Geographic Regions
 
The following table illustrates the destination of the net sales of the Consumer Specialties segment by geographic region.
 
Net Sales to External Customers by Destination — Consumer Specialties
 
                                                
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008 
   % of
   % of
   % of
    % of
   % of
   % of
 
 $ Segment $ Segment $ Segment  $ Segment $ Segment $ Segment 
 (In millions, except percentages)  (In millions, except percentages) 
North America  176   16%  194   17%  201   18%  186   17   176   16   194   17 
Europe and Africa  452   42%  497   43%  427   39%  448   41   452   42   497   43 
Asia-Pacific  402   37%  413   36%  437   39%  394   36   402   37   413   36 
South America  48   5%  51   4%  46   4%  61   6   48   5   51   4 
              
Total    1,078 (1)        1,155         1,111       1,089 (1)      1,078 (1)      1,155 (1)    
              
 
(1)Excludes inter-segment sales of $9 million, $6 million and $0 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2009.2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
• Customers
 
Sales of acetate tow are principally to the major tobacco companies that account for a majority of worldwide cigarette production. Our contracts with most of our customers are entered into on an annual basis.
 
Nutrinova primarily markets Sunett® sweetener to a limited number of large multinational and regional customers in the beverage and food industry under long-term and annual contracts. Nutrinova markets food protection ingredients


10


primarily through regional distributors to small and medium sized customers and directly through regional sales offices to large multinational customers in the food industry.
 
• Competition
• Competition
 
Acetate Products’ principal competitors include Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd. (“Daicel”), Eastman Chemical Corporation (“Eastman”) and Rhodia S.A.
 
The principal competitors for Nutrinova’s Sunett® sweetener are Holland Sweetener Company, The NutraSweet Company, Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Tate & Lyle PLC and several Chinese manufacturers. In sorbates, Nutrinova competes with Nantong AA, Daicel, Yu Yao/Ningbo, Yancheng AmeriPac and other Chinese manufacturers of sorbates.
 
Industrial Specialties
 
Our Industrial Specialties segment includesis comprised of our Emulsions PVOH and EVA Performance Polymers businesses. Our Emulsions business is a global leader which produces a broad product portfolio, specializing in vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions,businesses and is a recognized authority onleading producer of environmentally sensitive, low VOC (volatilevolatile organic compounds), an environmentally-friendly technology.compound (“VOC”) applications. Our PVOHemulsions products are used in a wide array of applications, including paints and coatings, adhesives, construction, glass fiber, textiles and paper. EVA Performance Polymers offers a complete line of low-density polyethylene and specialty EVA resins and compounds used in many applications including flexible packaging films, lamination film products, hot melt adhesives, medical devices and tubing, automotive, carpeting and solar cell encapsulation films. Our polyvinyl alcohol (“PVOH”) business was included in our Industrial Specialties segment until it was sold in July 2009 to Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. (“Sekisui”) for a net cash purchase price of $168 million. The PVOH business produced a broad portfolio of performance PVOH chemicals engineered to meet specific customer requirements. Our


12


Primary raw materials for our emulsions and EVA products are used inVAM which is produced by our Acetyl Intermediates segment and ethylene which we purchase externally from a wide arrayvariety of applications including paints and coatings, adhesives, building and construction, glass fiber, textiles and paper. EVA Performance Polymers offers a complete line of low-density polyethylene and specialty ethylene vinyl acetate resins and compounds. EVA Performance Polymers’ products are used in many applications including flexible packaging films, lamination film products, hot melt adhesives, medical tubing and devices, automotive carpet and solar cell encapsulation films.sources.
 
• Key Products
• Key Products
 
The products in ourOur Emulsions business includeproduces conventional vinylvinyl- and acrylate basedacrylate-based emulsions and high-pressure vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions.VAE. Emulsions are made from VAM, acrylate esters and styrene. Our Emulsions business is a leading producer of vinyl acetate ethylene emulsionsVAE in Europe. These products areVAE is a key component of water-based architectural coatings, adhesives, non-wovens,nonwovens, textiles, glass fiber and other applications.
Sales from the Emulsions business amounted to approximately 15%, 13% and 14% of our consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
PVOH is used in adhesives, building products, paper coatings, films and textiles. The primary raw material to produce PVOH is VAM, while acetic acid is produced as a by-product. Our PVOH business was sold to Sekisui in July 2009.
 
EVA Performance Polymers produces low-density polyethylene and EVA resins and compounds that are used in the manufacture of hot melt adhesives, automotive carpet, lamination film products, flexible packaging films, medical tubing and solar cell encapsulation films.compounds. EVA resins and compounds are produced in high-pressure reactors from ethylene and VAM.
 
• Facilities
• Facilities
 
The Emulsions business has production sites in the United States, Canada, China, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands and Germany. EVA Performance Polymers has a production facility in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Our PVOH production sites in the United States and Spain were sold to Sekisui in July 2009.


11


• Geographic Regions
• Geographic Regions
 
The following table illustrates the destination of the net sales of the Industrial Specialties segment by geographic region.
 
Net Sales to External Customers by Destination — Industrial Specialties
 
                                                
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008
   % of
   % of
   % of
    % of
   % of
   % of
 $ Segment $ Segment $ Segment  $ Segment $ Segment $ Segment
 (In millions, except percentages)    (In millions, except percentages)  
North America  382   39%  617   44%  583   43%   450    43    382    39    617    44 
Europe and Africa  504   52%  684   48%  674   50%   481    47    504    52    684    48 
Asia-Pacific  78   8%  81   6%  69   5%   97    9    78    8    81    6 
South America  10   1%  24   2%  20   2%   8    1    10    1    24    2 
              
Total    974         1,406         1,346        1,036        974        1,406     
              
• Customers
 
Industrial Specialties’ products are sold to a diverse group of regional and multinational customers. Customers for emulsions products are manufacturers of water-based paints and coatings, adhesives, paper, building and construction products, glass fiber, non-wovens and textiles. The customers of the PVOH business are primarily engaged in the production of adhesives, paper, films, building products and textiles. Customers of EVA Performance Polymers products are primarily engaged in the manufacture of adhesives, automotive components, packaging materials, print media and solar energy products.
 
• Competition
• Competition
 
Principal competitors in the Emulsions business include The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”), BASF, Dairen Chemical, Wacker Chemie AG and several smaller regional manufacturers.
 
Principal competitors for the EVA Performance Polymers EVA resins and compounds business include DuPont, ExxonMobil Chemical, Arkema and several Asian manufacturers.


13


Acetyl Intermediates
 
Our Acetyl Intermediates segment produces and supplies acetyl products, including acetic acid, VAM, acetic anhydride and acetate esters. These products are generally used as starting materials for colorants, paints, adhesives, coatings and medicines. Other chemicals produced in this business segment are organic solvents and intermediates for pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical products.
 
• Key ProductsIn November 2010, we announced our newly developed advanced technology to produce ethanol, which will be included in our Acetyl Intermediates segment. This innovative, new process combines our proprietary and leading acetyl platform with highly advanced manufacturing technology to produce ethanol from hydrocarbon-sourced feedstocks. In January 2011, we signed letters of intent for projects to construct and operate industrial ethanol production facilities and signed a memorandum of understanding for production of certain feedstocks used in our advanced ethanol production process.
• Key Products
 
Acetyl Products. Acetyl products include acetic acid, VAM and acetic anhydride and acetaldehyde.anhydride. Acetic acid is primarily used to manufacture VAM, PTA and other acetyl derivatives. VAM is used in a variety of adhesives, paints, films, coatings and textiles. Acetic anhydride is a raw material used in the production of cellulose acetate, detergents and pharmaceuticals. Acetaldehyde is a major feedstock for the production of a variety of derivatives, such as pyridines, which are used in agricultural products. We manufacture acetic acid, VAM and acetic anhydride for our own use, as well as for sale to third parties.
 
Acetic acid and VAM, ourOur basic acetyl intermediates products, acetic acid and VAM, are impacted by global supply and demand fundamentals and are cyclical in nature. The principal raw materials in these products areare: carbon monoxide, which we generally purchase under long-term contracts; methanol, which we generally purchase under long-term and short-term contracts; and ethylene, which we purchase from numerous sources; carbon monoxide, which we purchase under long-term contracts; and methanol, which we purchase under long-term and short-term contracts.sources. With the exception of carbon monoxide, these raw materials are commodity products available from a wide variety of sources.


12


Our production of acetyl products employs leading proprietary and licensed technologies, including our proprietary AOPlus®2 and AOPlustm®2 technologies for the production of acetic acid and VAntagetm® and VAntage Plustm VAM technology. We believe our production technology is one of the lowest cost in the industry and provides us a cost advantage over our competitors.
Sales from acetyl products amounted to 34%, 34% and 35% of our consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Solvents and Derivatives. Solvents and derivatives productsThese include a variety of solvents, formaldehyde and other chemicals, which in turn are used in the manufacture of paints, coatings, adhesives and other products.
Many solvents and derivatives products are derived from our production of acetic acid. Primary products are:
 
•    Ethyl acetate, an acetate ester that is a solvent used in coatings, inks and adhesives and in the manufacture of photographic films and coated papers; and
•    Butyl acetate, an acetate ester that is a solvent used in inks, pharmaceuticals and perfume.
•  Ethyl acetate, an acetate ester that is a solvent used in coatings, inks and adhesives and in the manufacture of photographic films and coated papers; and
•  Butyl acetate, an acetate ester that is a solvent used in inks, pharmaceuticals and perfume.
 
Formaldehyde and formaldehyde derivative products are derivatives of methanol and are made up of the following products:
 
•  Formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde and formcels are primarily used to produce adhesive resins for plywood, particle board, coatings, POM engineering resins and a compound used in making polyurethane; and
•  Other chemicals, such as crotonaldehyde, are used by the Nutrinova line for the production of sorbates, as well as raw materials for the fragrance and food ingredients industry.


14


•    Formaldehyde, paraformaldehyde and formcels are primarily used to produce adhesive resins for plywood, particle board, coatings, POM engineering resins and a compound used in making polyurethane;
•    Amines such as methyl amines, monisopropynol amines and butyl amines are used in agrochemicals, herbicides and the treatment of rubber and water; and
•    Special solvents, such as crotonaldehyde, which are used by the Nutrinova line for the production of sorbates, as well as raw materials for the fragrance and food ingredients industry.
 
Solvents and derivatives are commodity products characterized by cyclicality in pricing. The principal raw materials used in solvents and derivatives products are acetic acid, various alcohols, methanol, ethylene and ammonia. We manufacture many of these raw materials for our own use as well as for sales to third parties, including our competitors in the solvents and derivatives business. We purchase ethylene from a variety of sources. We manufacture acetaldehyde in Europe for our own use, as well as for sale to third parties.
 
Sales from acetyl products amounted to approximately 34%, 35% and 34% of our consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Sales from solvents and derivatives products amounted to approximately11%, 10%, 12% and 12% of our consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively.
 
• Facilities
• Facilities
 
Acetyl Intermediates has production sites in the United States, China, Mexico, Singapore, Spain, France and Germany. As of December 31, 2009, acetic acid and VAM production at our Pardies, France location had ceased. In addition, our Cangrejera, Mexico site no longer produced VAM as of December 31, 2009. We also participate in a strategic venture in Saudi Arabia that produces methanol and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (“MTBE”). Over the last few years, we have continued to shift our production capacity to lower cost production facilities while expanding in growth markets,regions, such as China.


13


• Geographic Regions
• Geographic Regions
 
The following table illustrates net sales by destination of the Acetyl Intermediates segment by geographic region.
 
Net Sales to External Customers by Destination — Acetyl Intermediates
 
                                                
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008
   % of
   % of
   % of
    % of
   % of
   % of
 $ Segment $ Segment $ Segment  $ Segment $ Segment $ Segment
 (In millions, except percentages)  (In millions, except percentages)
North America  501   22%  743   23%  685   23%   654    24    501    22    743    23 
Europe and Africa  771   35%  1,198   37%  1,183   40%   897    34    771    35    1,198    37 
Asia-Pacific  884   40%  1,142   36%  968   33%   1,046    39    884    40    1,142    36 
South America  64   3%  116   4%  119   4%   85    3    64    3    116    4 
              
Total    2,220 (1)        3,199 (1)        2,955 (1)       2,682 (1)       2,220 (1)       3,199 (1)    
              
 
(1)Excludes inter-segment sales of $400 million, $383 million $676 million and $660$676 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and 2007, respectively.
• Customers
 
Acetyl Intermediates markets its products both directly to customers and through distributors.
 
Acetic acid, VAM and acetic anhydride are global businesses which have several large customers. Generally, we supply these global customers under multi-year contracts. The customers of acetic acid, VAM and acetic anhydride produce polymers used in water-based paints, adhesives, paper coatings, polyesters, film modifiers, pharmaceuticals, cellulose acetate and textiles. We have long-standing relationships with most of these customers.
 
Solvents and derivatives are sold to a diverse group of regional and multinational customers both under multi-year contracts and on the basis of long-standing relationships. The customers of solvents and derivatives are primarily engaged in the production of paints, coatings and adhesives. We manufacture formaldehyde for our own use as well as for sale to a few regional customers that include manufacturers in the wood products and chemical derivatives industries. The sale of formaldehyde is based on both long and short-term agreements. Specialty solvents and amines are sold globally to a wide variety of customers, primarily in the coatings and resins and the specialty products industries. These products serve global marketsregions in the synthetic lubricant, agrochemical, rubber processing and other specialty chemical areas.


15


• Competition
• Competition
 
Our principal competitors in the Acetyl Intermediates segment include Atofina S.A., BASF, British PetroleumBP PLC, Chang Chun Petrochemical Co., Ltd., Daicel, Dow, Eastman, DuPont, LyondellBasell Industries, Nippon Gohsei, Perstorp Inc., Jiangsu Sopo Corporation (Group) Ltd., Showa Denko K.K., and Kuraray Co. Ltd.
 
Other Activities
 
Other Activities primarily consists of corporate center costs, including financing and administrative activities such as legal, accounting and treasury functions, interest income and expense associated with our financing activities, and our captive insurance companies. Our two wholly-owned captive insurance companies are a key component of our global risk management program, as well as a form of self-insurance for our property, liability and workers compensation risks. The captive insurance companies issue insurance policies to our subsidiaries to provide consistent coverage amid fluctuating costs in the insurance market and to lower long-term insurance costs by avoiding or reducing commercial carrier overhead and regulatory fees. The captive insurance companies retain risk at levels approved by management and obtain reinsurance coverage from third parties to limit the net risk retained. One of the captive insurance companies also insures certain third-party risks.


14


InvestmentsStrategic Ventures & Affiliates
 
We have a significant portfolio of strategic investments, including a number ofrelationships and ventures in various regions, including Asia-Pacific, North America, the Middle East and Europe. In aggregate, these strategic investments enjoy significant sales, earnings and cash flow. WeHistorically, we have entered into these strategic investments in order to gain access to local demand, minimize costs and accelerate growth in areas we believe have significant future business potential. See Note 8 toDepending on the consolidated financial statementslevel of investment and other factors, we account for additional information.our strategic ventures using either the equity method or cost method of accounting.
 
The table below representsIn aggregate, our strategic investments generate significant sales, earnings and cash flows. For example, during the year ended December 31, 2010, our equity affiliates generated combined sales of $4.5 billion resulting in $168 million of equity in earnings from affiliates during the same period.
Our significant strategic ventures as of December 31, 2009:2010 are as follows:
 
                 ��          
         Year
          Year
 
 Location Ownership Segment Partner(s) Entered    Location     Ownership   Business Segment Partner(s)  Entered  
Equity Method Investments
                            
Korea Engineering Plastics Co. Ltd South Korea  50% Advanced Engineered Materials Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc./Mitsubishi
Corporation
  1999 
National Methanol Company Saudi Arabia  25% Advanced Engineered Materials Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (“SABIC”)/ Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd.  1981 
Korea Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd South Korea  50% Advanced Engineered Materials Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc./Mitsubishi Corporation  1999 
Polyplastics Co., Ltd.  Japan  45% Advanced Engineered
Materials
 Daicel Chemical
Industries Ltd.
  1964  Japan  45% Advanced Engineered Materials Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd.  1964 
Fortron Industries LLC US  50% Advanced Engineered
Materials
 Kureha Corporation  1992  US  50% Advanced Engineered Materials Kureha Corporation  1992 
Cost Method Investments
                            
National Methanol Co.  Saudi Arabia  25% Acetyl Intermediates Saudi Basic Industries
Corporation (“SABIC”)/
Texas Eastern Arabian
Corporation Ltd.
  1981 
Kunming Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.  China  30% Consumer Specialties China National Tobacco
Corporation
  1993  China  30% Consumer Specialties China National Tobacco Corporation  1993 
Nantong Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.  China  31% Consumer Specialties China National Tobacco
Corporation
  1986  China  31% Consumer Specialties China National Tobacco Corporation  1986 
Zhuhai Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.  China  30% Consumer Specialties China National Tobacco
Corporation
  1993  China  30% Consumer Specialties China National Tobacco Corporation  1993 
 
• Major Equity Method InvestmentsNational Methanol Company (Ibn Sina). With production facilities in Saudi Arabia, Ibn Sina represents approximately 2% of the world’s methanol production capacity and is one of the world’s largest producers of MTBE, a gasoline additive. We indirectly own a 25% interest in Ibn Sina through CTE Petrochemicals Company, a


16


joint venture with Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd. Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd. indirectly owns an additional 25% interest in Ibn Sina, and the remaining 50% interest is held by SABIC. SABIC is responsible for all product marketing.
In April 2010, we announced that Ibn Sina will construct a 50,000 ton POM production facility in Saudi Arabia and that the term of the joint venture agreement was extended until 2032. Ibn Sina’s existing natural gas supply contract expires in 2022. The purpose of the plant is to supply POM to support Celanese’s Advanced Engineered Materials segment growth as well as our venture partners’ regional business development. Upon successful startup of the POM facility, our indirect economic interest in Ibn Sina will increase from 25% to 32.5%. SABIC’s economic interest will remain unchanged.
In connection with the extension of the venture, we reassessed the factors surrounding the accounting method for this investment and changed from the cost method of accounting for investments to the equity method of accounting for investments beginning April 1, 2010.
 
Korea Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd. Founded in 1987, KEPCO is the leading producer of polyacetalPOM in South Korea. Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. owns 40% and Mitsubishi Corporation owns 10% of KEPCO. KEPCO operates a POM plant in Ulsan, South Korea and participates with Polyplastics and Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. in a world-scale POM facility in Nantong, China.
 
Polyplastics Co., Ltd. We believe Polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the Asia-Pacific region. Polyplastics’ principal production facilities are located in Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and China. We believe Polyplastics is a leading producer and marketer of POM in the Asia-Pacific region.
 
Fortron Industries LLC. We believe Fortron Industries LLC (“Fortron”) is a leading global producer of PPS. Fortron’s facility is located in Wilmington, North Carolina. We believe Fortron has the leading technology in linear polymer applications.
• Major Cost Method Investments
National Methanol Co. (“Ibn Sina”). With production facilities in Saudi Arabia, Ibn Sina represents approximately 2% of the world’s methanol production capacity and is the world’s eighth largest producer of MTBE. Methanol and MTBE are key global commodity chemical products. We indirectly own a 25% interest in Ibn Sina through CTE Petrochemicals Co., a joint venture with Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd. (which also indirectly owns 25%), with the remainder held by SABIC (50%). SABIC has responsibility for all product marketing.
 
China Acetate Productsacetate strategic ventures. We hold an approximately 30% ownership interestsinterest (50% board representation) in three separate Acetate Products production entities in China: the Nantong, Kunming and Zhuhai Cellulose Fiber Companies. In each instance, the Chinese state-owned tobacco entity, China National Tobacco Corporation, controls the remainder. TheWith an estimated 30% share of the world’s cigarette production and consumption, China is the world’s largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 Stanford Research Institute International Chemical Economics Handbook. Combined, these ventures are a leader in Chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply Chinese cigarette producers.
In December 2009, we announced plans with China National Tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our Nantong facility. During 2010 we received formal approval to expand flake and tow capacities, each by 30,000 tons. Our Chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flows.flow. We made contributions during 2010 of $12 million and have committed to contributions of $17 million in 2011 related to the capacity expansion in Nantong.


15


These cost investments whereOur Chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year, based on the ventures’ performance for the preceding year. In 2010, 2009 and 2008, we own greater than a 20%received cash dividends of $71 million, $56 million and $46 million, respectively.
Despite the fact that our ownership interest are accountedexceeds 20% in each of our China Acetate Products ventures, we account for underthese investments using the cost method of accounting because we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities. We determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities, limitations on our involvement in theday-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“US GAAP”).


17


• Other Equity Investments
• Other Equity Investments
 
InfraServs. We hold ownership interests in several InfraServ entities located in Germany. InfraServsGermany that own and develop industrial parks and provideon-site general and administrative support to tenants. The table below represents our equity investments in InfraServ ventures as of December 31, 2009:2010:
 
     
Company
 Ownership % 
 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Gendorf KG  39%
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Knapsack KG  27%
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Hoechst KG  32%
 
Raw Materials and Energy
 
We purchase a variety of raw materials and energy from sources in many countries for use in our production processes. We have a policy of maintaining, when available, multiple sources of supply for materials. However, some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials, such as carbon monoxide, steam and acetaldehyde. Although we have been able to obtain sufficient supplies of raw materials, there can be no assurance that unforeseen developments will not affect our raw material supply. Even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material, there can be no assurance that these sources can make up for the loss of a major supplier. There cannot be any guarantee that profitability will not be affected should we be required to qualify additional sources of supply to our specifications in the event of the loss of a sole supplier. In addition, the price of raw materials varies, often substantially, from year to year.
 
A substantial portion of our products and raw materials are commodities whose prices fluctuate as market supply/supply and demand fundamentals change. Our production facilities rely largely on fuel oil, natural gas, coal and electricity for energy. Most of the raw materials for our European operations are centrally purchased by one of our subsidiaries, which also buys raw materials on behalf of third parties. We manage our exposure to commodity risk primarily through forward purchase contracts,the use of long-term supply agreements, and multi-year purchasing and sales agreements. During 2009, we did not enter into any commodity financial derivativeagreements and forward purchase contracts. See Note 2 and Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
 
We also currently purchase and lease supplies of various precious metals, such as rhodium, used as catalysts for the manufacture of Acetyl Intermediates products. For precious metals, the leases are distributed between a minimum of three lessors per product and are divided into several contracts.
 
Research and Development
 
All of our businesses conduct research and development activities to increase competitiveness. Our businesses are innovation-oriented and conduct research and development activities to develop new, and optimize existing, production technologies, as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications. We consider the amountamounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be adequatesufficient to drive our current strategic initiatives.
 
Intellectual Property
 
We attach great importance to patents, trademarks, copyrights and product designs in order to protect our investment in research and development, manufacturing and marketing. Our policy is to seek the widest possible protection for significant product and process developments in our major markets. Patents may cover processes, products, intermediate products and product uses. We also seek to register trademarks extensively as a


16


means of protecting the brand names of our products, which brand names become more important once the corresponding products or process patents have expired.products. We protect our trademarksintellectual property vigorously against infringement and also seek to register design protection where appropriate.
 
Patents.In most industrial countries, patent protection exists for new substances and formulations, as well as for unique applications and production processes. However, we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce. We maintain strict information security policies and procedures wherever we do business. Such information security policies and procedures include data encryption,


18


controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information, as well as employee awareness training. Moreover, we monitor our competitorscompetitive developments and vigorously defend and enforceagainst infringements on our intellectual property rights.
 
Neither Celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one particular patent, trademark, copyright or trade secret.
• TrademarksTrademarks.
 AOPlus®, AOPlus®2, AOPlus®, VAntage®, VAntage Plustm, BuyTiconaDirecttm, Celanex®, Celcon®, Celstran®, Celvolit®, Compel®, Erkol®, GUR®, Hostaform®, Impet®, Mowilith®, Nutrinova®, Riteflex®, Sunett®, Thermx®, Zenite®, Vandar®, Vectra®, Vinamul®, EcoVAE®, Duroset®, Ateva®, Acetex® and certain other products and services named in this document are trademarks, service marks or registered trademarks of Celanese. The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all trademarks, service marks or registered trademarks owned by Celanese. Fortron® is a registered trademark of Fortron Industries LLC, a ventureone of Celanese.Celanese’s equity investments.
Neither Celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent, trademark, copyright or trade secret.
 
Environmental and Other Regulation
 
Matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed inItem 1A. Risk Factors,Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Accounting for Commitments and Contingencies, and Note 1615 and Note 2423 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2009, we had 7,400 employees worldwide. The following table sets forth the approximate number of employees employed by Celanese on a continuing basis.basis throughout the world is as follows:
 
     
  Employees as of
 
  December 31, 20092010 
 
North America    
US  2,500            2,350  
Canada  250 
Mexico  700 
     
Total  3,4503,300 
Europe    
Germany  1,600 
Other Europe  1,6001,500  
     
Total  3,2003,100 
Asia  700800 
Rest of World  50 
     
Total  7,4007,250 
     
 
Many of our employees are unionized, particularly in Germany, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Brazil Belgium and France. However, inBelgium. In the United States, however, less than one quarter of our employees are unionized. Moreover, in Germany and France, wages and general working conditions are often the subject of centrally negotiated collective bargaining agreements. Within the limits established by these agreements, our various subsidiaries negotiate directly with the


17


unions and other labor organizations, such as workers’ councils, representing the employees. Collective bargaining agreements between the German chemical employers associations and unions relating to remuneration generally have a term of one year, while in the United States a three year term for collective bargaining agreements is typical. We offer comprehensive benefit plans for employees and their families and believe our relations with employees are satisfactory.


19


Backlog
 
We do not consider backlog to be a significant indicator of the level of future sales activity. In general, we do not manufacture our products against a backlog of orders. Production and inventory levels are based on the level of incoming orders as well as projections of future demand. Therefore, we believe that backlog information is not material to understanding our overall business and should not be considered a reliable indicator of our ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance.
 
Available Information — Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Filings and Corporate Governance Materials
 
We make available free of charge, through our internet website(http://www.celanese.com), our annual reports onForm 10-K, quarterly reports onForm 10-Q, current reports onForm 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as ownership reports on Form 3 and Form 4, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with, or furnishing it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internetinternet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including Celanese Corporation, that electronically file with the SEC athttp://www.sec.gov.
 
We also make available free of charge, through our internet website, our Corporate Governance Guidelines of our Board of Directors and the charters of each of the committees of the Board. Such materials are also available in print upon the written request of any shareholder to Celanese Corporation, 1601 West LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas,75234-6034, Attention: Investor Relations.
 
Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
Many factors could have an effect on our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. We are subject to various risks resulting from changing economic, environmental, political, industry, business and financial conditions. The factors described below represent our principal risks.
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
The worldwide economic downturnOur business is exposed to risks associated with the creditworthiness of our suppliers, customers and difficult conditionsbusiness partners and the industries in the global capitalwhich our suppliers and credit markets have affected andcustomers participate are cyclical in nature, both of which may continue to adversely affect our business as well as the industriesand results of many of our customers and suppliers, which are cyclical in nature.operations.
 
Some of the marketsindustries in which our end-use customers participate, such as the automotive, electrical, construction and textile industries, are cyclical in nature, thus posing a risk to us which is beyond our control. These marketsThe industries in which these customers participate are highly competitive, to a large extent driven by end-use markets,applications, and may experience overcapacity, all of which may affect demand for and pricing of our products.
Recent declines in consumer and business confidence and spending, together with severe reductions in the availability and cost of credit and volatility in the capital and credit markets, have adversely affected the business and economic environment in which we operate and the profitability of our business. Our business is exposed to risks associated with the creditworthiness of our key suppliers, customers and business partners. In particular, we are exposed to risks associated with reduced levels of automotivepartners and textile production and declinesreductions in the housing market. These conditions have resulted in financial instability or other adverse effects at many ofdemand for our suppliers, customers or business partners.customers’ products. The consequences of such adverse effectsthis could include the interruption of production at the facilities of our customers, the reduction, delay or cancellation of customer orders, delays in or the inability of customers to obtain financing to purchase our products, delays or interruptions of the supply of raw


18


materials we purchase and bankruptcy of customers, suppliers or other creditors. The continuationoccurrence of any of these events may adversely affect our cash flow, profitability and financial condition.
During 2008 and 2009, as a result of the economic downturn, lenders and institutional investors reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers reducing the availability of liquidity and credit to fund or support the continuation and expansion of business operations worldwide. Although the markets have stabilized since 2008, future disruption of the credit markets could adversely affect our customer’s access to credit which supports the continuation and expansion of their businesses worldwide and could result in contract cancellations or suspensions, payment delays or defaults by our customers.
 
We are a company with operations around the world and are exposed to general economic, political and regulatory conditions and risks in the countries in which we have significant operations.
 
We operate in the global marketglobally and have customers in many countries. We have major facilities primarily located in North America, Europe and Asia, and hold interests in ventures that operate in the US, Germany, China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Saudi Arabia. Our principal customers are similarly global in scope, and the prices of our most significant products are typically world market prices. Also, our operations in certain foreign jurisdictions are subject to nationalization and expropriation risk, and some of our contractual relationships within these


20


jurisdictions are subject to cancellation without full compensation for loss. Consequently, our business and financial results are affected, directly and indirectly, by world economic, political and regulatory conditions.
 
In addition to the worldwide economic downturn, conditions such as the uncertainties associated with war, terrorist activities, civil unrest, epidemics, pandemics, weather, the effects of climate change or political instability in any of the countries in which we operate could affect us by causing delays or losses in the supply or delivery of raw materials and products, as well as increasing security costs, insurance premiums and other expenses. These conditions could also result in or lengthen economic recession in the United States, Europe, Asia or elsewhere.
 
Failure to comply with applicable laws, rules, regulations or court decisions could expose us to fines, penalties and other costs. Moreover, changes in laws or regulations, such as unexpected changes in regulatory requirements (including import or export licensing requirements), or changes in the reporting requirements of the United States, German, or European Union (“EU”) or Asian governmental agencies, could increase the cost of doing business in these regions. Any of these conditions may have an effect on our business and financial results as a whole and may result in volatile current and future prices for our securities, including our stock. Although we maintain insurance to cover risks associated with the operation of our business, there can be no assurance that the types of insurance we obtain or the level of coverage is adequate or that we will be able to continue to maintain our existing insurance or obtain comparable insurance at a reasonable cost, if at all.
 
In particular, we have invested significant resources in China and other Asian countries. This region’s growth has slowed and we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits associated with our investment there and our financial results may be adversely impacted.
 
We are subject to risks associated with the increased volatility in the prices and availability of key raw materials and energy.
 
We purchase significant amounts of natural gas, ethylene and methanol from third parties for use in our production of basic chemicals in the Acetyl Intermediates segment, principally formaldehyde, acetic acid, VAM and VAM.formaldehyde. We use a portion of our output of these chemicals, in turn, as inputs in the production of further products in all our business segments. We also purchase significant amounts of wood pulp for use in our production of cellulose acetate in the Consumer Specialties segment. The price of many of these items is dependent on the available supply of such item and may increase significantly as a result of production disruptions or strikes. For example,In particular, to the unplanned shutdownextent of our Clear Lake, Texas facility during 2007 together with other tight supply conditions causedvertical integration in the production of chemicals, shortages in the availability of raw material chemicals, such as natural gas, ethylene and methanol, can have an increased adverse impact on us as it can cause a shortage of acetic acidin intermediate and increased the price for such product.finished products. Such shortages would adversely impact our ability to produce certain products and increase our costs.
 
We are exposed to volatility in the prices of our raw materials and energy. Although we have agreements providing for the supply of natural gas, ethylene, wood pulp, electricity and fuel oil, the contractual prices for these raw materials and energy vary with marketeconomic conditions and may be highly volatile. Factors that have caused volatility in our raw material prices in the past and which may do so in the future include:
 
•  Shortages of raw materials due to increasing demand, e.g., from growing uses or new uses;
 
•  Capacity constraints, e.g., due to construction delays, labor disruption or involuntary shutdowns;


19


•  The general level of business and economic activity; and
 
•  The direct or indirect effect of governmental regulation.
 
If we are not able to fully offset the effects of higher energy and raw material costs, or if such commodities were unavailable, it could have a significant adverse effect on our financial results.


21


Failure to develop new products and production technologies or to implement productivity and cost reduction initiatives successfully may harm our competitive position.
 
Our operating results especially in our Consumer Specialties and Advanced Engineered Materials segments, depend significantly on the development of commercially viable new products, product grades and applications, as well as production technologies. If we are unsuccessful in developing new products, applications and production processes in the future, our competitive position and operating results may be negatively affected. For example, we recently announced our intention to construct new ethanol manufacturing facilities in China and the US that will utilize advanced technology developed with elements of our proprietary advanced acetyl platform. However, as we invest in the commercialization of this new process technology, we face the risk of unanticipated operational or commercialization difficulties, including an inability to obtain necessary permits or governmental approvals, failure of facilities or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations, construction delays, cost over-runs, the unavailability of required materials and equipment and various other factors. Likewise, we have undertaken and are continuing to undertake initiatives in all business segments to improve productivity and performance and to generate cost savings. These initiatives may not be completed or beneficial or the estimated cost savings from such activities may not be realized.
 
RecentUS federal regulations aimed at increasing security at certain chemical production plants and similar legislation that may be proposed in the future could, if passed into law, require us to relocate certain manufacturing activities and require us to alter or discontinue our production of certain chemical products, thereby increasing our operating costs and causing an adverse effect on our results of operations.
 
Regulations have recently been issuedare being implemented by the US Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) aimed at decreasing the risk, and effects, of potential terrorist attacks on chemical plants located within the United States. Pursuant to these regulations, these goals would be accomplished in part through the requirement that certain high-priority facilities develop a prevention, preparedness, and response plan after conducting a vulnerability assessment. In addition, companies may be required to evaluate the possibility of using less dangerous chemicals and technologies as part of their vulnerability assessments and preventionsecurity plans and implementing feasible safer technologies in order to minimize potential damage to their facilities from a terrorist attack. We have registered certain of our sites with DHS in accordance with these regulations, have conducted vulnerability assessments at applicable sites and are conducting vulnerability assessments for our sitesawaiting DHS review and untilapproval of security plans. Until that is done we cannot statedetermine with certainty the costs associated with any security plansmeasures that DHS may require. These regulations may be revised further, and additional legislation may be proposed in the future on this topic. It is possible that such future legislation could contain terms that are more restrictive than what has recently been passed and which would be more costly to us. We cannot predict the final form of currently pending legislation, or other related legislation that may be passed and can provide no assurance that such legislation will not have an adverse effect on our results of operations in a future reporting period.
 
Environmental regulations and other obligations relating to environmental matters could subject us to liability for fines,clean-ups and other damages, require us to incur significant costs to modify our operations and increase our manufacturing and delivery costs.
 
Costs related to our compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and potential obligations with respect to contaminated sites may have a significant negative impact on our operating results. These obligations include the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”) related to sites currently or formerly owned or operated by us, or where waste from our operations was disposed. We also have obligations related to the indemnity agreement contained in the demerger and transfer agreement between Celanese GmbH and Hoechst AG, also referred to as the demerger agreement, for environmental matters arising out of certain divestitures that took place prior to the demerger.
 
Our operations are subject to extensive international, national, state, local and other supranational laws and regulations that govern environmental and health and safety matters, including CERCLA and RCRA. We incur substantial capital and other costs to comply with these requirements. If we violate them,any one of those laws or regulations, we can be held liable for substantial fines and other sanctions, including limitations on our operations as a result of changes to or revocations of environmental permits involved. Stricter environmental, safety and health laws, regulations and enforcement


20


policies could result in substantial costs and liabilities to us or limitations on our operations and could subject our handling, manufacture, transport, use, reuse or disposal of substances or pollutants to more rigorous scrutiny than at present. One example of such regulations is the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (“NESHAP”) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers, which was issued in


22


draft form by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) on April 29, 2010. In its current draft form, these rules could require us to make significant capital expenditures to comply with stricter emissions requirements for industrial boilers at our facilities. Consequently, compliance with these laws and regulations could result in significant capital expenditures as well as other costs and liabilities, which could causeadversely affect our business and cause our operating results to be less favorable than expected. An adverse outcome in these claim procedures may negatively affect our earnings and cash flows in a particular reporting period.
 
Changes in environmental, health and safety regulations in the jurisdictions where we manufacture and sell our products could lead to a decrease in demand for our products.
 
New or revised governmental regulations and independent studies relating to the effect of our products on health, safety and the environment may affect demand for our products and the cost of producing our products.
 
In June 2009, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) formally proposed to list vinyl acetate monomer (“VAM”),add VAM, along with 11 other substances, to a list of chemicals “known to the state of California” to cause cancer. OEHHA is required to maintain this list under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (“Proposition 65”). Celanese filed comments in opposition to the proposed listing because the listing was not based on a scientific review of the relevant data and the legal standard for adding VAM to the Proposition 65 list had not been met. Celanese also filed an action in the Sacramento County SupervisorSuperior Court seeking declaration that OEHHA’s proposed listing of VAM would be contrary to law. The Superior Court granted Celanese’s request for relief. ItAn appeal filed by OEHHA is anticipated that OEHHA will appeal that decision.pending in the California Court of Appeal.
 
We can provide no assurance that the Sacramento County Superior Court decision will be affirmed on appeal, or that VAM or other chemicals we produce will not be classified in other jurisdictions in a manner that would adversely affect demand for such products.
 
We are a producer of formaldehyde and plastics derived from formaldehyde. Several studies have investigated possible links between formaldehyde exposure and various end points including leukemia. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (“IARC”), a private research agency, has reclassified formaldehyde from Group 2A (probable human carcinogen) to Group 1 (known human carcinogen) based on studies linking formaldehyde exposure to nasopharyngeal cancer, a rare cancer in humans. In October 2009, IARC also concluded based on a recent study that there is sufficient evidence for a casual association between formaldehyde and the development of leukemia. We expect the results of IARC’s review will be examined and considered by government agencies with responsibility for setting worker and environmental exposure standards and labeling requirements.
 
Other pending initiatives will potentially require toxicological testing and risk assessments of a wide variety of chemicals, including chemicals used or produced by us. These initiatives include the Voluntary Children’s Chemical Evaluation Program, High Production Volume Chemical Initiative and expected modifications to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)(“TSCA”) in the United States, as well as various European Commission programs, such as the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACh)(“REACh”).
 
The above-mentioned assessments in the United States and Europe may result in heightened concerns about the chemicals involved and additional requirements being placed on the production, handling, labeling or use of the subject chemicals. Such concerns and additional requirements could also increase the cost incurred by our customers to use our chemical products and otherwise limit the use of these products, which could lead to a decrease in demand for these products. Such a decrease in demand would likely have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
 
Our business exposes us to potential product liability claims and recalls, which could adversely affect our financial condition and performance.
The development, manufacture and sales of specialty chemical products by us, including products produced for the food, beverage, cigarette, and pharmaceutical industries, involve an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims, product recalls, product seizures and related adverse publicity. A product liability claim or judgment against


23


us could also result in substantial and unexpected expenditures, affect consumer or customer confidence in our products, and divert management’s attention from other responsibilities. Although we maintain product liability insurance, there can be no assurance that this type or the level of coverage is adequate or that we will be able to continue to maintain its existing insurance or obtain comparable insurance at a reasonable cost, if at all. A product recall or a partially or completely uninsured judgment against us could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
We are subject to risks associated with possible climate change legislation, regulation and international accords.
 
Greenhouse gas emissions have increasingly become the subject of a large amount of international, national, regional, state and local attention. Cap and trade initiatives to limit greenhouse gas emissions have been introduced in the EU. Similarly, numerous bills related to climate change have been introduced in the US Congress, which could adversely impact all industries. In addition, futurethe EPA has promulgated rules limiting greenhouse gas emissions and regulation of greenhouse gas also could occur pursuant to future US treaty obligations, statutory or regulatory changes under the Clean Air Act or new climate change legislation.


21


While not all are likely to become law, this is a strong indication that additional climate change related mandates will be forthcoming, and it is expected that they may adversely impact our costs by increasing energy costs and raw material prices, and establishing costly emissions trading schemes and requiring modification of equipment.equipment to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
 
A step toward potential federal restriction on greenhouse gas emissions was taken on December 7, 2009 when the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued its Endangerment Finding in response to a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. The EPA found that the emission of six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (which is emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels), may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare. Based on this finding, the EPA defined the mix of these six greenhouse gases to be “air pollution” subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act. Although the EPA has stated a preference that greenhouse gas regulation be based on new federal legislation rather than the existing Clean Air Act, absent legislative action, the EPA has begun to regulate many sources of greenhouse gas emissions.
For example, on January 2, 2011, many large sources of greenhouse gas emissions may be regulated withoutbecame subject to the needrequirements of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) permitting program. The PSD permitting program requires these large sources of greenhouse gas emissions to install Best Available Control Technology (“BACT”) to limit greenhouse gas emissions when modifying equipment if the increased greenhouse gas emissions will exceed 75,000 tons per year. Texas, however, has refused to implement the PSD permitting program for greenhouse gas emissions, which prompted the EPA to attempt to take over GHG permitting from the state regulators late last year. On December 30, 2010, an Appellate Court stayed EPA’s action pending a determination of whether EPA’s take-over complies with the U.S. Clean Air Act. Additionally, the EPA announced on December 23, 2010 that it would impose further legislation.greenhouse gas emission limits on electric generating units and petroleum refineries through the establishment of New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”).
 
The US Congress is consideringrecently considered legislation that would create an economy-wide“cap-and-trade” system that would establish a limit (or cap) on overall greenhouse gas emissions and create a market for the purchase andand/or sale of emissions permits or “allowances.” Under the leadingcap-and-tradethese proposals, before Congress, the chemical industry likely would be affected due to anticipated increases in energy costs as fuel providers pass on the cost of the emissions allowances, which they would be required to obtain, to cover the emissions from fuel production and the eventual use of fuel by the Company or its energy suppliers. In addition,cap-and-trade proposals would likely increase the cost of energy, including purchases of steam and electricity, and certain raw materials used by the Company.
Other countries are also considering or have implemented“cap-and-trade” systems. regulatory programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Future environmental legislative and regulatory developments related to climate change are possible, which could materially increase operating costs in the chemical industry and thereby increase our manufacturing and delivery costs.


24


Our production facilities handle the processing of some volatile and hazardous materials that subject us to operating risks that could have a negative effect on our operating results.
 
Our operations are subject to operating risks associated with chemical manufacturing, including the related storage and transportation of raw materials, finished products and waste. These risks include, among other things, pipeline and storage tank leaks and ruptures, explosions and fires and discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances.
 
These operating risks can cause personal injury, property damage and environmental contamination, and may result in the shutdown of affected facilities and the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. The occurrence of any of these events may disrupt production and have a negative effect on the productivity and profitability of a particular manufacturing facility and our operating results and cash flows.
 
Production at our manufacturing facilities could be disrupted for a variety of reasons, which could prevent us from producing enough of our products to maintain our sales and satisfy our customers’ demands.
 
A disruption in production at one or more of our manufacturing facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business. Disruptions could occur for many reasons, including fire, natural disasters, weather, unplanned maintenance or other manufacturing problems, disease, strikes, transportation interruption, government regulation or terrorism. Alternative facilities with sufficient capacity or capabilities may not be available, may cost substantially more or may take a significant time to start production, each of which could negatively affect our business and financial performance. If one of our key manufacturing facilities is unable to produce our products for an extended period of time, our sales may be reduced by the shortfall caused by the disruption and we may not be able to meet our customers’ needs, which could cause them to seek other suppliers. For example, during 2007,In particular, production was disrupted for an extended period of timedisruptions at our Clear Lake, Texas facilitymanufacturing facilities that produces primarilyproduce chemicals used as inputs in the production of chemicals in other business segments, such as acetic acid, VAM and VAM. The disruption was caused by an unplanned outage of our acetic acid unit. Because of this disruption, the volumes of our Acetyl Intermediates segment were lower than we had expected for 2007 as we were unable to fully offset the lost production. Similar outages could occur in the future from unexpected disruptions at any of our other manufacturing facilities of key products. Such outagesformaldehyde, could have ana more significant adverse effect on our business and financial performance and results of operationsoperation to the extent of such vertical integration. Furthermore, to the extent a production disruption occurs at a manufacturing facility that has been operating at or near full capacity, the resulting shortage of our product could be particularly harmful because production at the manufacturing facility may not be able to be sufficiently increased in future reporting periods.the future.


22


Our business and financial results may be adversely affected by various legal and regulatory proceedings.
 
We are subject to legal and regulatory proceedings, lawsuits and claims in the normal course of business and could become subject to additional claims in the future, some of which could be material. The outcome of existing proceedings, lawsuits and claims may differ from our expectations because the outcomes of litigation, including regulatory matters, are often difficult to reliably predict. Various factors or developments can lead us to change current estimates of liabilities and related insurance receivables where applicable, or permit us to make such estimates for matters previously not susceptible to reasonable estimates, such as a significant judicial ruling or judgment, a significant settlement, significant regulatory developments, or changes in applicable law. A future adverse ruling, settlement, or unfavorable development could result in charges that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition in any particular period. For a more detailed discussion of our legal proceedings, seeItem 3. Legal Proceedingsbelow.
 
Our success depends upon our ability to attract and retain key employees and the identification and development of talent to succeed senior management.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain key personnel, and we rely heavily on our management team. The inability to recruit and retain key personnel or the unexpected loss of key personnel may adversely affect our operations. In addition, because of the reliance on our management team, our future success depends in part on our ability to identify and develop talent to succeed senior management. The retention of key personnel and appropriate senior management succession planning will continue to be critically important to the successful implementation of our strategies.


25


We may not be able to complete future acquisitions or successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, which could affect adversely our business or results of operations.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue acquisitions and joint venture opportunities. Successful accomplishment of this objective may be limited by the availability and suitability of acquisition candidates and by our financial resources, including available cash and borrowing capacity. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including difficulty determining appropriate valuation, integrating operations, technologies, services and products of the acquired lines or businesses, personnel turnover and the diversion of management’s attention from other business matters. In addition, we may be unable to achieve anticipated benefits from these acquisitions in the timeframe that we anticipate, or at all, which could affect adversely our business or results of operations.
We may experience unexpected difficulties and incur unexpected costs in the relocation of our Ticona plant from Kelsterbach to the Rhine Main area, which may increase our costs, delay the transition or disrupt our ability to supply our customers.
 
We have agreed with Frankfurt, Germany Airport (“Fraport”) to relocate our Kelsterbach, Germany business,operations to another location, resolving several years of legal disputes related to the planned Frankfurt airport expansion. As a result of the settlement, we will transition Ticona’s operations from Kelsterbach to another location in Germany by mid-2011. In July 2007, we announced that we would relocate the Kelsterbach, Germany businessoperations to the Hoechst Industrial Park in the Rhine Main area. Over a five-year period, Fraport agreed to pay Ticona a total of €670 million over a5-year period to offset the costs associated with the transition of the business from its current location and the closure of the Kelsterbach plant. Whileplant and the settlement and related payment amount was meanttransition of the operations from its current location. As the relocation project progressed, we decided to be cost-neutral and representexpand the amount required to select a site, buildscope of the new production facilities demolish old production facilities and transition business activities accordingnow expect to schedule and without any disruptionsspend in excess of the proceeds to customer supply, we may encounter unexpected costs or other difficulties duringbe received from Fraport. Because the relocation process that bring the total costs of the relocation to an amount greater than the compensation provided by Fraport. The relocation of these facilitiesour Kelsterbach, Germany operations represents a major logistical undertaking, the construction of our new facilities may be delayed, actual costs may exceed our revised estimates and we may be subject to penalties if we have underestimatednot timely vacated the amount that will be required to carry out every aspect of the relocation. We may lose the services of valuable experienced employees during the transition if they decide not to work at the newKelsterbach location. The construction of the new facilities may not be complete on time or may face cost overruns. If our costs relating to the relocation exceed the amount of payments from Fraport or if the relocation causes other unexpected difficulties, our expensescosts may increase or supplies to our customers may be disrupted.
If supply to our customers is disrupted for an extended period, this could negatively impact the reputation of this business and result in the loss of customers. Such effects could have an adverse impact on our results of operations in future periods.
 
Our significant non-US operations expose us to global exchange rate fluctuations that could adversely impact our profitability.
 
Because we conduct a significant portion of our operations outside the United States, fluctuations in currencies of other countries, especially the Euro, may materially affect our operating results. For example, changes in currency exchange rates may decrease our profits in comparison to the profits of our competitors on the same products sold in the same markets and increase the cost of items required in our operations.
 
A substantial portion of our net sales is denominated in currencies other than the US dollar. In our consolidated financial statements, we translate our local currency financial results into US dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period or the exchange rate at the end of that period. During times of a strengthening US dollar our reported international sales, earnings, assets and liabilities will be reduced because the local currency will translate into fewer US dollars.
 
In addition to currency translation risks, we incur a currency transaction risk whenever one of our operating subsidiaries enters into either a purchase or a sales transaction using a currency different from the operating subsidiary’s functional currency. Given the volatility of exchange rates, we may not be able to manage our currency transaction and translation risks effectively, and volatility in currency exchange rates may expose our financial


23


condition or results of operations to a significant additional risk. Since a portion of our indebtedness is and will be denominated in currencies other than US dollars, a weakening of the US dollar could make it more difficult for us to repay our indebtedness.indebtedness denominated in foreign currencies unless we have cash flows in those foreign currencies from our foreign operations sufficient to repay that indebtedness out of those cash flows.
 
We use financial instruments to hedge ourcertain exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, but we cannot guarantee that our hedging strategies will be effective. Failure to effectively manage these risks could have an adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


26


Significant changes in pension fund investment performance or assumptions relating to pension costs may have a material effect on the valuation of pension obligations, the funded status of pension plans and our pension cost.
 
The cost of our pension plans is incurred over long periods of time and involves many uncertainties during those periods of time. Our funding policy for pension plans is to accumulate plan assets that, over the long run, will approximate the present value of projected benefit obligations. Our pension cost is materially affected by the discount rate used to measure pension obligations, the level and value of plan assets available to fund those obligations at the measurement date and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Significant changes in investment performance or a change in the portfolio mix of invested assets can result in corresponding increases and decreases in the valuation of plan assets, particularly equity securities, or in a change of the expected or actual rate of return on plan assets. During 2008, the value of our plan assets declined significantly due to the decline in the overall equity markets. A change in the discount rate would result in a significant increase or decrease in the valuation of pension obligations, affecting the reported funded status of our pension plans as well as the net periodic pension cost in the following fiscal years. In recent years, an extended duration strategy in the asset portfolio has been implemented to minimize the influence of liability volatility due to interest rate movements. Similarly, changes in the expected return on plan assets can result in significant changes in the net periodic pension cost for subsequent fiscal years. If the value of our pension fund’s portfolio declines or does not perform as expected or if our experience with the fund leads us to change our assumptions regarding the fund, we may be required to contribute additional capital in addition to the fund.those contributions for which we have already planned.
 
Our future success will depend in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights. Our inability to protect and enforce these rights could reduce our ability to maintain our market position and our profit margins.
 
We attach great importance to our patents, trademarks, copyrights and product designsknow-how and trade secrets in order to protect our investment in research and development, manufacturing and marketing. We have also adopted rigorous internal policies for protecting our valuable know-how and trade secrets. We sometimes license patents and other technology from third parties. Our policy is to seek the widest possible protection for significant product and process developments that provide us competitive advantages in our major markets. Patents may cover catalysts, processes, products, intermediate products and product uses. Protection for individual products extends forThese patents provide varying periods in accordance withof protection based on the filing date of the patent application, filing and the legal life of patents, in the various countries. The protection afforded, which may also vary from country to country, depends upon the type of patent and its scope of coverage.in the various countries in which we seek protection. As patents expire, the productscatalysts, processes and processesproducts described and claimed in those patents become generally available for use by the public.public subject to our continued protection for associated know-how and trade secrets. We also seek to register trademarks extensively as a means of protecting the brand names of our products, which brand names become more important once the corresponding product or process patents have expired. Our continued growth strategy may bring us toWe operate in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce.enforce and our continued growth strategy may bring us to additional regions with similar challenges. If we are not successful in protecting or maintaining our patent, license, trademark or other intellectual property rights, our revenues, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
 
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as any shareholders’ rights plan, may discourage a takeover attempt.
 
Provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so might be beneficial to our shareholders. Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws impose various procedural and other requirements, which could make it more difficult for shareholders to effect certain corporate actions. For example, our certificate of incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of unissued series of preferred stock, without any vote or action by our shareholders. Thus, our Board of Directors can authorize and issue shares of preferred stock with


24


voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting or other rights of holders of our Series A common stock. These rights may have the effect of delaying or deterring a change of control of our Company. In addition, a change of control of our company may be delayed or deterred as a result of our having three classes of directors (each class elected for a three year term) or as a result of any shareholders’ rights plan that our Board of Directors may adopt. These provisions could limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Series A common stock.


27


Risks Related to the Acquisition of Celanese GmbH, formerly Celanese AG
 
The amounts of the fair cash compensation and of the guaranteed annual payment offered under the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (“Domination(the “Domination Agreement”) and/or the compensation paid in connection with the squeeze-outsqueeze out may be increased, which may further reduce the funds the Purchaserthat our subsidiary, BCP Holdings GmbH, a German limited liability company (“BCP Holdings”), can otherwise make available to us.
 
Several minority shareholders of Celanese GmbH have initiated special award proceedings seeking the court’s review of the amounts of the fair cash compensation and of the guaranteed annual payment offered under the Domination Agreement. On December 12, 2006, the Frankfurt District Court appointed an expert to help determine the value of Celanese AG as of July 31, 2004, on which date an extraordinary shareholder meeting of Celanese AG was held to resolve the Domination Agreement. As a result of these proceedings, the amounts of the fair cash compensation and of the guaranteed annual payment could be increased by the court, and the PurchaserBCP Holdings would be required to make such payments within two months after the publication of the court’s ruling. Any such increase may be substantial. All minority shareholders would be entitled to claim the respective higher amounts. This may reduce the funds the PurchaserBCP Holdings can make available to us and, accordingly, diminish our ability to make payments on our indebtedness. See Note 2423 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information.
 
The Company also received applications for the commencement of award proceedings filed by 79 shareholders against the PurchaserBCP Holdings with the Frankfurt District Court requesting the court to set a higher amount for the Squeeze-Out compensation. Should the court set a higher value for the Squeeze-Out compensation, former Celanese AG shareholders who ceased to be shareholders of Celanese AG due to the Squeeze-Out are entitled, pursuant to a settlement agreement between the PurchaserBCP Holdings and certain former Celanese AG shareholders, to claim for their shares the higher of the compensation amounts determined by the court in these different proceedings. Previously received compensation for their shares will be offset so that those shareholders who ceased to be shareholders of Celanese AG due to the Squeeze-Out are not entitled to more than higher of the amount set in the two court proceedings.
 
The PurchaserCelanese Deutschland Holding GmbH (“CDH”) may be required to compensate BCP Holdings for annual losses, which may reduce the funds CDH can otherwise make available to us.
CDH and BCP Holdings have entered into a profit and loss transfer agreement on December 3, 2009 which became effective on December 10, 2009 (the “PLTA”). Under the PLTA, CDH is required, among other things, to compensate BCP Holdings for any annual loss incurred, determined in accordance with German accounting requirements, by BCP Holdings at the end of the fiscal year in which the loss was incurred. This obligation to compensate BCP Holdings for annual losses will apply during the entire term of the PLTA. If BCP Holdings incurs losses during any period of the operative term of the PLTA and if such losses lead to an annual loss of BCP Holdings at the end of any given fiscal year during the term of the PLTA, CDH will be obligated to make a corresponding cash payment to BCP Holdings to the extent that the respective annual loss is not fully compensated for by the dissolution of profit reserves accrued at the level of BCP Holdings during the term of the PLTA. CDH may be able to reduce or avoid cash payments to BCP Holdings by off-setting against such loss compensation claims made by BCP Holdings any valuable counterclaims against BCP Holdings that CDH may have. If CDH is obligated to make cash payments to BCP Holdings to cover an annual loss, we may not have sufficient funds to make payments on our indebtedness when due and, unless CDH is able to obtain funds from a source other than annual profits of BCP Holdings, CDH may not be able to satisfy its obligation to fund such shortfall.
BCP Holdings may be required to compensate Celanese GmbH for annual losses, which may reduce the funds the PurchaserBCP Holdings can otherwise make available to us.
 
BCP Holdings and Celanese GmbH have entered into a new domination agreement on March 26, 2010 which became effective on April 9, 2010 (the “Domination Agreement II”). Under the Domination Agreement the PurchaserII, BCP Holdings is required, among other things, to compensate Celanese GmbH for any annual loss incurred, determined in accordance with German accounting requirements, by Celanese GmbH at the end of the fiscal year in which the


28


loss was incurred. This obligation to compensate Celanese GmbH for annual losses will apply during the entire term of the Domination Agreement.Agreement II. If Celanese GmbH incurs losses during any period of the operative term of the Domination Agreement II and if such losses lead to an annual loss of Celanese GmbH at the end of any given fiscal year during the term of the Domination Agreement the PurchaserII, BCP Holdings will be obligated to make a corresponding cash payment to Celanese GmbH to the extent that the respective annual loss is not fully compensated for by the dissolution of profit reserves accrued at the level of Celanese GmbH during the term of the Domination Agreement. The PurchaserAgreement II. BCP Holdings may be able to reduce or avoid cash payments to Celanese GmbH by off-setting against such loss compensation claims by Celanese GmbH any valuable counterclaims against Celanese GmbH that the PurchaserBCP Holdings may have. If the PurchaserBCP Holdings is obligated to make cash payments to Celanese GmbH to cover an annual loss, we may not have sufficient funds to make payments on our indebtedness when due and, unless the PurchaserBCP Holdings is able to obtain funds from a source other than annual profits of Celanese GmbH, the PurchaserBCP Holdings may not be able to satisfy its obligation to fund such shortfall. See Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements. Since the Domination Agreement has been terminated effective as of December 31, 2009, there will be no obligation by the Purchaser to compensate Celanese GmbH for any losses incurred after December 31, 2009.


25


We and two of our subsidiaries have taken on certain obligations with respect to the Purchaser’s obligation under the Domination Agreement and intercompany indebtedness to Celanese GmbH, which may diminish our ability to make payments on our indebtedness.
 
Our subsidiaries, Celanese International Holdings Luxembourg S.à r.l. (“CIH”), formerly Celanese Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A., and Celanese US, have each agreed to provide the Purchaser with financing so that the Purchaser is at all times in a position to completely meet its obligations under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement. In addition, Celanese has guaranteed (i) that the Purchaser will meet its obligation under the Domination Agreement to compensate Celanese GmbH for any annual loss incurred by Celanese GmbH during the term of the Domination Agreement; and (ii) the repayment of all existing intercompany indebtedness of Celanese’s subsidiaries to Celanese GmbH. Further, under the terms of Celanese’s guarantee, in certain limited circumstances Celanese GmbH may be entitled to require the immediate repayment of some or all of the intercompany indebtedness owed by Celanese’s subsidiaries to Celanese GmbH. If CIHand/or Celanese US are obligated to make payments under their obligations to the Purchaser or Celanese GmbH, as the case may be, or if the intercompany indebtedness owed to Celanese GmbH is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds for payments on our indebtedness when due. Since the Domination Agreement has been terminated effective as of December 31, 2009, there will be no obligation by the Purchaser to compensate Celanese GmbH for any losses incurred after December 31, 2009 and our subsidiaries will be released from their obligations.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
See alsoItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Debt and Other Obligations.
 
Our level of indebtedness could diminish our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or the chemicals industry and prevent us from meeting obligations under our indebtedness.
 
Our total indebtedness is approximately $3.5$3.2 billion as of December 31, 2009.2010. See Note 13 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information.
 
Our debtlevel of indebtedness could have important consequences, including:
 
•    increasing vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions including exacerbating any adverse business effects that are determined to be material adverse effects under our senior credit facility;
•  increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions including exacerbating the impact of any adverse business effects that are determined to be material adverse events under our existing senior credit facilities (the “Senior Credit Agreement”);
•  requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities or pay dividends on our common stock;
•  exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates as certain of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest;
•  limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and
•  limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who have less debt.
 
•    requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operationsWe may be able to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;
•    exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates as certain of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest;
•    limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and
•    limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who have less debt.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in any debt instrument governing our current or future indebtedness could result in a default under that instrument and, due to cross-default provisions, could result in a default under our senior credit facility. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the senior credit facility, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders could proceed against the collateral, if any, granted to them to secure the indebtedness. If the lenders under the senior credit facility were to accelerate the payment of the indebtedness, there is no guarantee that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient to repay in full our outstanding indebtedness.


26


Moreover, the terms of our existing debt do not fully prohibit us or our subsidiaries from incurring substantialincur additional indebtedness in the future. If newfuture, which could increase the risks described above.
Although covenants under the Senior Credit Agreement and the Indenture governing the $600 million in aggregate principal amount of 65/8% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “Notes”) limit our ability to incur certain additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness we could incur in compliance with these restrictions could be significant. To the extent that we incur additional indebtedness, the risks associated with our leverage described above, including our possible inability to service our debt, including amounts available under our senior credit agreement, is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify. See alsoItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Debt and Other Obligations.Notes, would increase.
 
Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly and affect our operating results.
 
Certain of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates were to increase, our debt service obligations on our variable rate indebtedness would increase, net of the impacts of hedges in place.increase. As of December 31, 2009, 2010,


29


we had $2.2$1.6 billion, €440€296 million and CNY 1.41.5 billion of variable rate debt, of which $1.6$1.5 billion and €150 million is hedged with interest rate swaps, which leaves $643$73 million, €290€146 million and CNY 1.41.5 billion of variable rate debt subject to interest rate exposure. Accordingly, a 1% increase in interest rates would increase annual interest expense by approximately $13$5 million.
Our senior credit agreement consists See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of $2,280 millionFinancial Condition and Results of US dollar denominated and €400 million of Euro denominated term loans due 2014, a $600 million revolving credit facility terminating in 2013 and a $228 million credit-linked revolving facility terminating in 2014. Borrowings under the senior credit agreement bear interest at a variable interest rate based on LIBOR (for US dollars) or EURIBOR (for Euros), as applicable, or, for US dollar denominated loans under certain circumstances, a base rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for the term loans and any loans under the credit-linked revolving facility is 1.75%, subject to potential reductions as defined in the new senior credit agreement. The term loans under the senior credit agreement are subject to amortization at 1% of the initial principal amount per annum, payable quarterly, commencing in July 2007. The remaining principal amount of the term loans will be due on April 2, 2014.
An increase in interest rates could have an adverse impact on our future results of operations and cash flows. See alsoItem 7A.Operations – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk — Interest Rate Risk Management.Risk” and Note 21 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information.
 
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness, and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.
Our ability to satisfy our cash needs depends on cash on hand, receipt of additional capital, including possible additional borrowings, and receipt of cash from our subsidiaries by way of distributions, advances or cash payments.
 
Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our debt obligations depends on the financial condition and operating performance of our subsidiaries, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control. We may not be able to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness.
 
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. The senior credit agreement governing our indebtednessSenior Credit Agreement restricts our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from the disposition. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain the proceeds which we could realize from them and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.
 
Restrictive covenants in our debt instrumentsagreements may limit our ability to engage in certain transactions and may diminish our ability to make payments on our indebtedness.
 
The senior credit agreementSenior Credit Agreement and the Indenture governing our indebtedness containsthe Notes each contain various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions. The covenants contained inIndenture governing the senior credit agreementNotes will limit ourCelanese US’s and certain of its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness,debt; pay dividends on or make other distributions on or repurchase capital


27


stock or make other restricted payments; consummate specified asset sales; enter into transactions with affiliates; incur liens, impose restrictions on the ability of a subsidiary to pay dividends or make payments make investmentsto Celanese US and its restricted subsidiaries; merge or consolidate with any other person; and sell, certain assets. Such restrictions in our debt instruments could result in us having to obtainassign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of Celanese US’s assets or the consentassets of our lenders in order to take certain actions. Recent disruptions in credit markets may prevent us from or make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain such consents from our lenders. Our ability to expand our business or to address declines in our business may be limited if we are unable to obtain such consents.its restricted subsidiaries.
 
In addition, the senior credit agreementSenior Credit Agreement requires us to maintain a maximum first lien senior secured leverage ratio if there are outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. Our ability to meet this financial ratio can be affected by events beyond our control, and we may not be able to meet this test at all.
 
Such restrictions in our debt instruments could result in us having to obtain the consent of holders of the Notes and of our lenders in order to take certain actions. Disruptions in credit markets may prevent us from obtaining or make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain such consents. Our ability to expand our business or to address declines in our business may be limited if we are unable to obtain such consents.
A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default, under the senior credit agreement. Upon the occurrencewhich, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of an event ofoperations. Furthermore, a default under the senior credit agreement,Senior Credit Agreement could permit lenders to accelerate the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstandingmaturity of our indebtedness under the senior credit agreementSenior Credit Agreement and to be immediately due and payable and terminate allany commitments to extend further credit.lend. If we were unable to repay those amounts,such indebtedness, the lenders under the senior credit agreementSenior Credit Agreement could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. Our subsidiaries have pledged a significant portion of our assets as collateral to secure our indebtedness under the senior credit agreement.Senior Credit Agreement. If the lenders under the senior credit agreementSenior Credit Agreement accelerate the repayment of borrowings,such indebtedness, we may not have sufficient assets to repay such amounts borrowedor our other indebtedness, including the Notes. In such event, we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.


30


Celanese and Celanese US are holding companies and depend on subsidiaries to satisfy their obligations under the senior credit agreement as well asNotes and the guarantee of Celanese US’s obligations under the Notes by Celanese.
As holding companies, Celanese and Celanese US conduct substantially all of their other indebtedness,operations through their subsidiaries, which could have a material adverse effect on the valueown substantially all of our stock.
consolidated assets. Consequently, the principal source of cash to pay Celanese and Celanese US’s obligations, including obligations under the Notes and the guarantee of the Celanese US’s obligations under the Notes by Celanese, is the cash that our subsidiaries generate from their operations. We cannot assure that our subsidiaries will be able to, or be permitted to, make distributions to enable Celanese USTheand/or Celanese to make payments in respect of their obligations. Each of our subsidiaries is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, applicable state laws, regulatory limitations and terms of our senior credit agreementdebt instruments may limit Celanese US’s and Celanese’s ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. While the Indenture governing the Notes limits the ability of Celanese Holdings LLC and itsour subsidiaries to restrict their ability to pay dividends or otherwise transfer their assetsmake other intercompany payments to us.
Our operationsus, these limitations are conducted throughsubject to certain qualifications and exceptions, which may have the effect of significantly restricting the applicability of those limits. In the event Celanese USand/or Celanese do not receive distributions from our subsidiaries, and our abilityCelanese USand/or Celanese may be unable to pay dividends is dependentmake required payments on the earnings andNotes, the distribution of funds from our subsidiaries. However, the terms of our senior credit agreement limit the abilityguarantee of Celanese Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries to pay dividendsUS’s obligations under the Notes by Celanese, or otherwise transfer their assets to us. Accordingly, our ability to pay dividends on our stock is similarly limited.other indebtedness.
 
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.


2831


Item 2. Properties
 
Description of Property
 
We own or lease numerous production and manufacturing facilities throughout the world. We also own or lease other properties, including office buildings, warehouses, pipelines, research and development facilities and sales offices. We continuously review and evaluate our facilities as a part of our strategy to optimize our business portfolio. The following table sets forth a list of our principal production and other facilities throughout the world as of December 31, 2009.2010.
 
     
Site Leased/Owned Products/Functions
Corporate Offices
    
Budapest, Hungary Leased Administrative offices
Dallas, Texas, US Leased Corporate headquarters
Kronberg/Taunus,Kelsterbach, Germany LeasedOwned Administrative offices
Mexico City, MexicoShanghai, China LeasedAdministrative offices
Mexico City, Mexico(1)
Owned Administrative offices
Advanced Engineered Materials
Auburn Hills, Michigan, US Leased Automotive Development Center
Bishop, Texas, US Owned POM, GUR®, Compounding
Florence, Kentucky, US Owned Compounding
Kelsterbach, GermanyOwnedLFRT, POM, Compounding
Oberhausen, Germany(5)
LeasedGUR®
Fuji City, Japan Owned by Polyplastics Co., Ltd.(7)(6) POM, PBT, LCP, Compounding
Frankfurt am Main, Germany(7)
Owned by InfraServ GmbH & Co. Hoechst KG(6)No operations in 2010; relocation site
Jubail, Saudi Arabia(9)
Owned by National Methanol Company(6)MTBE, Methanol
Kaiserslautern, Germany(1)
LeasedLFT
Kelsterbach, Germany(7)
OwnedLFT, POM, Compounding
Kuantan, Malaysia Owned by Polyplastics Co., Ltd.(7)(6) POM, Compounding
Nanjing, China(2)
LeasedLFT, GUR®, Compounding
Oberhausen, Germany(1)
LeasedGUR®
Shelby, North Carolina, US Owned LCP, PBT, PET, Compounding
Suzano, Brazil Owned
Suzano, Brazil(1)
Leased Compounding
Ulsan, South Korea Owned by Korea Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd.(7)(6) POM
Wilmington, North Carolina, US Owned by Fortron Industries LLC(7)(6) PPS
Winona, Minnesota, US Owned LFRT
Nanjing, China(3)
LeasedLFRT, GUR®LFT
Consumer Specialties
    
Frankfurt am Main, Germany(3)
Owned by InfraServ GmbH & Co. Hoechst KG(6)Sorbates, Sunett® sweetener
Kunming, China Owned by Kunming Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.(6)(5) Acetate tow Acetate flake
Lanaken, Belgium Owned Acetate tow
Nantong, China Owned by Nantong Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.(6)(5) Acetate tow, Acetate flake
Narrows, Virginia, US Owned Acetate tow, Acetate flake
Ocotlán, Jalisco, Mexico Owned Acetate tow, Acetate flake


32


SiteLeased/OwnedProducts/Functions
Spondon, Derby, UKUnited Kingdom Owned Acetate tow, Acetate flake,
Frankfurt am Main, Germany(4)
Owned by InfraServ GmbH & Co. Hoechst KG(7)Sorbates, Sunett® sweetener Acetate film
Zhuhai, China Owned by Zhuhai Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.(6)(5) Acetate tow Acetate flake
Industrial Specialties
    
Boucherville, Quebec, Canada Owned Conventional emulsions
Enoree, South Carolina, US Owned Conventional emulsions, Vinyl acetate ethyleneVAE emulsions
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Owned LDPE, EVA
Frankfurt am Main, Germany(4)(3)
 Owned by InfraServ GmbH & Co. Hoechst KG(7)(6) Conventional emulsions, Vinyl acetate ethyleneVAE emulsions
Geleen, Netherlands Owned Vinyl acetate ethyleneVAE emulsions
Guardo, SpainOwnedSite is no longer operating as of December 31, 2009.
Meredosia, Illinois, US Owned Conventional emulsions, Vinyl acetate ethyleneVAE emulsions


29


SiteLeased/OwnedProducts/Functions
Nanjing, China(3)(2)
 Leased Conventional emulsions, Vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions
Koper, SloveniaOwnedSite is no longer operating as of December 31, 2009.
Tarragona, Spain(2)
Owned by Complejo Industrial Taqsa AIE(6)Conventional emulsions, Vinyl acetate ethyleneVAE emulsions
Perstorp, Sweden Owned Conventional emulsions, Vinyl acetate ethyleneVAE emulsions
Warrington, UK
Tarragona, Spain(4)
 Owned by Complejo Industrial Taqsa AIE(5) Site is no longer operating as of December 31, 2009.Conventional emulsions, VAE emulsions
Acetyl Intermediates
    
Bay City, Texas, US Leased VAM
Bishop, Texas, US Owned Formaldehyde
Cangrejera, Veracruz, Mexico Owned Acetic anhydride, Ethyl acetate
Clear Lake, Texas, US Owned Acetic acid, VAM
Frankfurt am Main, Germany(4)(3)
 Owned by InfraServ GmbH & Co. Hoechst KG(7)(6) Acetaldehyde, VAM, Butyl acetate
Nanjing, China(3)
LeasedAcetic acid, Acetic anhydride, VAM
Pampa, Texas, USOwnedSite is no longer operating as of December 31, 2009.
Pardies, FranceOwnedSite is no longer operating as of December 31, 2009.
Roussillon, France(5)
LeasedAcetic anhydride
Jubail, Saudi ArabiaOwned by National Methanol Company(6)Methyl tertiary-butyl ether, Methanol
Jurong Island, Singapore(5)(1)
 Leased Acetic acid, Butyl acetate, Ethyl acetate, VAM
Nanjing, China(2)
LeasedAcetic acid, Acetic anhydride, VAM
Pampa, Texas, US(8)
OwnedSite is no longer operating
Pardies, FranceOwnedSite is no longer operating
Roussillon, France(1)
LeasedAcetic anhydride
Tarragona, Spain(2)(4)
 Owned by Complejo Industrial Taqsa AIE(6)(5) VAM
 
(1)Celanese owns the assets on this site, but utilizes the land through the terms of a long-term land lease.
Site is no longer operational and is currently held for sale.
(2)Multiple Celanese business segments conduct operations at the Tarragona site. Celanese owns its assets at the facility but shares ownership in the land. Celanese’s ownership percentage in the land is 15%.
(3)Multiple Celanese business segments conduct operations at the Nanjing facility. Celanese owns the assets on this site, but utilizes the land through the terms of a long-term land lease.
(4)(3)Multiple Celanese business segments conduct operations at the Frankfurt am Main facility.
(5)(4)Multiple Celanese business segments conduct operations at the Tarragona site. Celanese owns the assets on this site but utilizesshares ownership in the land. Celanese’s ownership percentage in the land is 15%.
(5)A Celanese cost method investment.
(6)A Celanese equity method investment.

33


(7)Celanese is relocating the Kelsterbach plant to the Frankfurt am Main facility. Celanese will own the assets, but utilize the land through the terms of a long-term land lease.
(6)(8)A Celanese cost method investment.
(7)A Celanese equity method investment.Site is no longer operational and is currently held for sale.
 
We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet the requirements of our present and foreseeable future operations. We continue to review our capacity requirements as part of our strategy to maximize our global manufacturing efficiency.
(9)Site moved from Acetyl Intermediates segment to Advanced Engineered Materials segment to reflect the change in the affiliate’s business dynamics and growth opportunities as a result of the future construction of the POM facility.
 
See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on our cost and equity method investments.
For information on environmental issues associated with our properties, seeItem 1A. Risk FactorsandItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Accounting for Commitments and Contingencies. Additional information with respect to our property, plant and equipment, and leases is contained in Note 9 and Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.

30


Item 3. Legal Proceedings
 
We are involved in a number of legal and regulatory proceedings, lawsuits and claims incidental to the normal conduct of our business, relating to such matters as product liability, contract antitrust, intellectual property, workers’ compensation, chemical exposure, prior acquisitions, past waste disposal practices and release of chemicals into the environment. While it is impossible at this time to determine with certainty the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, lawsuits and claims, we are actively defending those matters where the Company is named as a defendant. Additionally, we believe, based on the advice of legal counsel, that adequate reserves have been made and that the ultimate outcomes of all such litigation claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, but may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in any given accounting period. See Note 2423 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a discussion of materialcommitments and contingencies related to legal and regulatory proceedings.
 
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders[Removed and Reserved]
 
No matters were submittedExecutive Officers of the Registrant
The names, ages and biographies of our executive officers as of February 11, 2011 are as follows:
 NameAgePosition
David N. Weidman55Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Douglas M. Madden58Chief Operating Officer
Steven M. Sterin39Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
James S. Alder62Senior Vice President, Operations and Technical
Gjon N. Nivica, Jr. 46Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Mark W. Oberle45Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs
Jay C. Townsend52Senior Vice President, Business Strategy Development and Procurement
Jacquelyn H. Wolf49Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Christopher W. Jensen44Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
David N. Weidmanhas been our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since December 2004. He became Chairman of the board of directors in February 2007. Mr. Weidman joined Celanese AG (the Company’s predecessor) in September 2000 where he held a number of executive positions, most recently Vice Chairman and a member of its board of management. Before joining Celanese AG, Mr. Weidman held various leadership positions with AlliedSignal, most recently as the President of its performance polymers business. Mr. Weidman began his career in the chemical industry with American Cyanamid in 1980. He is a member of the board of the American Chemistry Council, the National Advisory Council of the Marriott School of Management and the Society of Chemical Industry. He is also a member of the Advancement Counsel for Engineering and Technology for the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology and a member of the board and Chairman of the finance committee of The Conservation Fund.
Douglas M. Maddenhas served as our Chief Operating Officer since December 2009. Prior to a vote of security holders duringthat time, Mr. Madden served as Corporate Executive Vice President with responsibility for the fourth quarter ofCompany’s Acetyl Intermediates and Industrial Specialties Segments since February 2009. He was the Executive Vice President and President, Acetate, EVA Performance Polymers and Emulsions & PVOH from 2006 through February 2009.


3134


Mr. Madden previously served as President of Celanese Acetate from October 2003 to 2006. Prior to assuming leadership for Celanese Acetate, Mr. Madden served as Vice President and General Manager of the acrylates business and head of global supply chain for Celanese Chemicals from 2000 to October 2003. Prior to 2000, Mr. Madden held various vice president level positions in finance, global procurement and business support with the Hoechst Celanese Life Sciences Group, Celanese Fibers and Celanese Chemicals businesses. In 1990, he served as business director for Ticona’s GUR business and held prior responsibilities as director of quality management for Specialty Products. Mr. Madden started his career with American Hoechst Corporation in 1984 as manager of corporate distribution. His prior experience included operational and distribution management with Warner-Lambert and Johnson & Johnson. Mr. Madden received a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from the University of Illinois.
Steven M. Sterinhas served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2007. Mr. Sterin previously served as our Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer from September 2005 to July 2007 and Director of Finance for Celanese Chemicals from 2003 to 2005 and Controller of Celanese Chemicals from 2004 to 2005. Prior to joining Celanese, Mr. Sterin worked for Reichhold, Inc., a subsidiary of Dainnippon Ink and Chemicals, Incorporated, beginning in 1997. There he held a variety of leadership positions in the finance organization before serving as Treasurer from 2000 to 2001 and later as Vice President of Finance, Coating Resins from 2001 to 2003. Mr. Sterin began his career at Price Waterhouse LLP, currently known as PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Sterin, a Certified Public Accountant, graduated from the University of Texas at Austin in May 1995, receiving both a Bachelor of Arts degree in business and a masters degree in professional accounting.
James S. Alderhas served as our Senior Vice President, Operations and Technical since February 2008. In this capacity he oversees our global manufacturing, supply chain and environmental, health and safety operations, as well as the Company’s overall productivity efforts, including Six Sigma and operational excellence. Mr. Alder previously served as our Vice President, Operations and Technical from 2000 to February 2008. Prior to 2000, Mr. Alder held various roles within the Company’s manufacturing, research and development and business management operations. He joined Celanese in 1974 as a process engineer and received a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from MIT in 1972.
Gjon N. Nivica, Jr. has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since April 2009. Prior to that time, Mr. Nivica served as Vice President and General Counsel of the $5 billion Honeywell Transportation Systems business group from 2005 to 2009, during which time he also served as Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary to Honeywell International Inc. Prior to that time, he was the Vice President and General Counsel to Honeywell Aerospace Electronic Systems from 2002 to 2005 and to Honeywell Engines Systems and Services from 1996 to 2002. Mr. Nivica began his career in 1989 as a corporate associate in the Los Angeles office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, where he specialized in acquisitions, divestitures and general corporate and securities work, before becoming M&A Senior Counsel to AlliedSignal Aerospace Inc. from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Nivica received his J.D., magna cum laude, from Boston University Law School.
Mark W. Oberlehas served as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs since February 2010. From April 2005 to February 2010, Mr. Oberle served as our Vice President, Investor Relations. He assumed overall responsibility for global communications and public affairs in 2006. Prior to joining Celanese, Mr. Oberle was Director of Investor Relations for Navistar International Corporation, where he served in a variety of financial and commercial roles. Prior to that time, he was a management consultant with KPMG. Mr. Oberle earned a bachelor’s and master’s degrees in business administration from Bradley University.
Jay C. Townsendhas served as our Senior Vice President, Business Strategy Development and Procurement since 2010. Mr. Townsend previously served as our Senior Vice President, Strategy and Business Development from 2007 to 2010, and as our Vice President of Business Strategy and Development from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Townsend joined Celanese in 1986 as a Business Analyst and has held several roles of increasing responsibility within the US and Europe. Mr. Townsend received his Bachelor of Science degree in international finance from Widener University in 1980.


35


Jacquelyn H. Wolfhas served as our Senior Vice President, Human Resources since December 2009. Prior to that time, she was the Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer for Comerica, Incorporated from January 2006 to December 2009. Ms. Wolf also held the position as Global Human Resources Director for General Motor’s Finance, Asset Management, and Economic Development & Enterprise Services organizations from May 1, 2002. Prior to this position, she supported the Information Systems & Services upon joining General Motors in July 2000 to January 2006. Before joining General Motors, she served as Vice President of Human Resources for Honeywell’s (previously AlliedSignal) Aerospace Market Segments in Phoenix, AZ. Prior to this role, she was Vice President, Human Resources at the Honeywell AlliedSignal Truck Brakes Division in Cleveland. Prior to Honeywell (AlliedSignal), she spent 12 years in human resource management and labor relations positions at the General Electric Corporation. Ms. Wolf earned a Ph.D. and a master’s degree in organizational and human systems from Fielding Graduate University (Santa Barbara, California), a master’s degree in management from Baker University (Overland Park, Kansas) and a bachelor’s degree in Organizational Communications from Youngstown State University (Youngstown, Ohio).
Christopher W. Jensenhas served as our Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer since August 2010. Prior to August 2010, Mr. Jensen served as our Vice President and Corporate Controller from March 2009 to July 2010. From May 2008 to February 2009, he served as Vice President of Finance and Treasurer. In his current capacity, Mr. Jensen has global responsibility for corporate finance, treasury operations, insurance risk management, pensions, business planning and analysis, corporate accounting, tax and general ledger accounting. Mr. Jensen was previously the Assistant Corporate Controller from March 2007 through April 2008, where he was responsible for SEC reporting, internal reporting, and technical accounting. In his initial role at Celanese from October 2005 through March 2007, he built and directed the company’s technical accounting function. From August 2004 to October 2005, Mr. Jensen worked in the inspections and registration division of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. He spent 13 years of his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in various positions in both the auditing and mergers & acquisitions groups. Mr. Jensen earned master’s and bachelor’s degrees in accounting from Brigham Young University and is a Certified Public Accountant.


36


 
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
 
Our Series A common stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CE” since January 21, 2005. The closing sale price of our Series A common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, on February 5, 20104, 2011 was $29.89.$42.93. The following table sets forth the high and low intraday sales prices per share of our Series A common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, for the periods indicated.
 
                
 Price Range  Price Range
 High Low  High Low
2010
      
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 $34.77  $28.20  
Quarter ended June 30, 2010 $35.83  $24.84  
Quarter ended September 30, 2010 $33.00  $23.47  
Quarter ended December 31, 2010 $41.74  $31.22  
 
2009
              
Quarter ended March 31, 2009 $  15.27  $7.44  $15.27  $7.44  
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 $24.30  $12.67  $24.30  $12.67  
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 $27.93  $19.72  $27.93  $19.72  
Quarter ended December 31, 2009 $33.41  $23.65  $33.41  $23.65  
2008
        
Quarter ended March 31, 2008 $43.72  $  31.76 
Quarter ended June 30, 2008 $50.99  $39.50 
Quarter ended September 30, 2008 $47.02  $24.68 
Quarter ended December 31, 2008 $27.76  $5.71 
 
Holders
 
No shares of Celanese’s Series B common stock and no shares of Celanese’s 4.25% convertible perpetual preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”) are issued and outstanding. As of February 5, 2010,4, 2011, there were 6446 holders of record of our Series A common stock, and one holder of record of our 4.25% convertible perpetual preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”).stock. By including persons holding shares in broker accounts under street names, however, we estimate our shareholder base to be approximately 28,000 as of February 5, 2010.33,500.
 
On February 1, 2010, we announceddelivered notice to the holders of our Preferred Stock that we would elect to redeemwere calling for the redemption of all of our 9,600,000 outstanding shares of ourPreferred Stock. Holders of the Preferred Stock on February 22, 2010 (“Redemption Date”). On that date,were entitled to convert each share of our Preferred Stock will be redeemed for a number ofinto 1.2600 shares of our Series A common stock, equal to the redemption price ($25.06) divided by 97.5% of the average closing price of our Series A common stock for the 10 trading days ending on the fifth trading day prior to February 22, 2010.
Holders of the Preferred Stock also have the right to convert their sharespar value $0.0001 per share, at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February 19, 2010, the business day immediately preceding the Redemption Date. Holders who want2010. As of such date, holders of Preferred Stock had elected to convert their shares of our Preferred Stock must satisfy all of the requirements as defined in the Certificate of Designations prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, in order to effect conversion of their9,591,276 shares of Preferred Stock. Each shareStock into an aggregate of 12,084,942 shares of Series A common stock. The 8,724 shares of Preferred Stock is convertible into 1.2600that remained outstanding after such conversions were redeemed by us on February 22, 2010 for 7,437 shares of our Series A common stock, subjectin accordance with the terms of the Preferred Stock. In addition to adjustment under certain circumstances as set forththe shares of Series A common stock issued in respect of the Certificatesshares of Designations.Preferred Stock converted and redeemed, we paid cash in lieu of fractional shares. See Note 16 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the Preferred Stock redemption.
 
Dividend Policy
 
Our Board of Directors adoptedhas a policy of declaring, subject to legally available funds, a quarterly cash dividend on each share of our Series A common stock at an annual rate of $0.16 per share unless our Board of Directors,as determined in its sole discretion, determines otherwise.discretion. Pursuant to this policy, we paid quarterly dividends of $0.04 per share on February 1, 2009,2010 and May 1, 2009, August 3, 2009 and November 2, 20092010 and similar quarterly dividends during each quarter of 2008.2009. In April 2010, our Board of Directors approved a 25% increase in the quarterly dividend rate from $0.04 to $0.05 per share of Series A common stock, which equates to $0.20 per share annually. Pursuant to this policy change, we paid quarterly dividends of $0.05 per share on August 2, 2010 and November 1, 2010. The annual


37


cash dividend declared and paid during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $28 million and 2008 were $23 million, and $24 million, respectively. Dividends payable to holders of our Series A common stock cannot be declared or paid nor can any funds be set aside for the payment thereof, unless we have paid or set aside funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of our Preferred Stock, as described below. Our Board of Directors may, at any time, modify or revoke our dividend policy on our Series A common stock.


32


We arewere required under the terms of our Preferred Stock to pay scheduled quarterly dividends, subject to legally available funds. Forfunds for so long as the Preferred Stock remains outstanding, (1) we will not declare, pay or set apart funds for the payment of any dividend or other distribution with respect to any junior stock or parity stock and (2) neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, will, subject to certain exceptions, redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration junior stock or parity stock through a sinking fund or otherwise, in each case unless we have paid or set apart funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of Preferred Stock and any parity stock for all preceding dividend periods.outstanding. Pursuant to this policy, we paid quarterly dividends of $0.265625 per share on our Preferred Stock on February 1, 2009, May 1, 2009, August 3, 2009 and November 2, 20092010 and similar quarterly dividends during each quarter of 2008.2009. No dividends were declared or paid subsequent to February 1, 2010 as a result of the Preferred Stock redemption as described above. The annual cash dividend declared and paid during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and 2008 were $10$3 million and $10 million, respectively.
 
On January 5, 2010,6, 2011, we declared a cash dividend of $0.265625 per share on our Preferred Stock amounting to $3 million and a cash dividend of $0.04$0.05 per share on our Series A common stock amounting to $6$8 million. BothThe cash dividends aredividend is for the period from November 2, 20092010 to January 31, 20102011 and werewas paid on February 1, 20102011 to holders of record as of January 15, 2010.
On February 1, 2010, we announced we would elect to redeem all of our outstanding Preferred Stock on February 22, 2010. Holders of the Preferred Stock also have the right to convert their shares at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February 19, 2010, the business day immediately preceding the February 22, 2010 redemption date.18, 2011.
 
Based on the increase in the quarterly dividend rate from $0.04 to $0.05 per share of Series A common stock beginning August 2010, number of outstanding shares as of December 31, 20092010 and considering the redemption of our Preferred Stock, cash dividends to be paid in 20102011 are expected to result in annual dividend payments less thanbe comparable to those paid in 2009.2010.
 
The amount available to us to pay cash dividends is restricted by our senior credit agreement.Senior Credit Agreement and the terms of our Notes. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
 
Celanese Purchases of its Equity Securities
 
The table below sets forth information regarding repurchases of our Series A common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2009:2010:
 
                 
           Approximate Dollar
 
        Total Number of
  Value of Shares
 
  Total Number
  Average
  Shares Purchased as
  Remaining that may be
 
  of Shares
  Price Paid
  Part of Publicly
  Purchased Under
 
Period Purchased(1)  per Share  Announced Program  the Program 
October 1-31, 2009  24,980  $  24.54   -  $     122,300,000.00 
November 1-30, 2009  -  $-   -  $122,300,000.00 
December 1-31, 2009  334  $32.03   -  $122,300,000.00 
                 
           Approximate Dollar
 
        Total Number of
  Value of Shares
 
  Total Number
  Average
  Shares Purchased as
  Remaining that may be
 
  of Shares
  Price Paid
  Part of Publicly
  Purchased Under
 
Period Purchased  per Share  Announced Program  the Program 
October 1-31, 2010  41,129 (1) $32.35   -  $81,300,000 
November 1-30, 2010  194,100  $36.05   194,100  $74,300,000 
December 1-31, 2010  335 (1) $39.09   -  $74,300,000 
                 
Total  235,564  $35.41   194,100   74,300,000 
                 
 
(1)Relates to shares employees havethe Company has elected to have withheldwithhold from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units. No shares were purchased during the three months ended December 31, 2009 under our previously announced stock repurchase plan.


3338


Performance Graph
 
The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.
 
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return
 


3439


Equity Compensation Plans
 
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
 
The following information is provided as of December 31, 20092010 with respect to equity compensation plans:
 
                        
     Number of Securities
      Number of Securities
 
     Remaining Available for
      Remaining Available for
 
 Number of Securities to be
 Weighted Average
 Future Issuance Under
  Number of Securities to be
 Weighted Average
 Future Issuance Under
 
 Issued upon Exercise of
 Exercise Price of
 Equity Compensation
  Issued upon Exercise of
 Exercise Price of
 Equity Compensation
 
 Outstanding Options,
 Outstanding Options,
 Plans (excluding securities
  Outstanding Options,
 Outstanding Options,
 Plans (excluding securities
 
Plan Category Warrants and Rights Warrants and Rights reflected in column (a))  Warrants and Rights Warrants and Rights reflected in column (a)) 
 (a) (b) (c)  (a) (b) (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:            
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders            
Stock options  100,000  $17.17   3,812,359   302,125  $27.36   2,322,450 
Restricted stock units  1,381,886   -   3,812,359   2,228,329      2,322,450 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:            
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(1)
            
Stock options  5,902,938  $19.05   -   4,970,842  $20.44   - 
Restricted stock units  1,283,021   -   -   952,305   -   - 
          
Total  8,667,845       3,812,359   8,453,601       2,322,450 
(1)The shares to be issued under plans not approved by shareholders relate to the Celanese Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, which is our former broad-based stock incentive plan for executive officers, key employees and directors. The 2004 Stock Incentive Plan allowed for the issuance or delivery of shares of our common stock through the award of stock options, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards as approved by the compensation committee of the board of directors. The 2004 Stock Incentive Plan was effectively replaced by the Celanese Corporation 2009 Global Incentive Plan. No further awards were made pursuant to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan upon shareholder approval of the 2009 Global Incentive Plan in April 2009. Both the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2009 Global Incentive Plan are described in more detail in Note 19 of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
 
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
 
Our deferred compensation plan offers certain of our senior employees and directors the opportunity to defer a portion of their compensation in exchange for a future payment amount equal to their deferments plus or minus certain amounts based upon the market-performance of specified measurement funds selected by the participant. These deferred compensation obligations may be considered securities of Celanese. Participants were required to make deferral elections under the plan prior to January 1 of the year such deferrals will be withheld from their compensation. We relied on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act in making this offer to a select group of employees, fewer than 35 of which were non-accredited investors under the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.


40


Item 6.Selected Financial Data
 
The balance sheet data shown below as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the statements of operations and cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, all of which are set forth below, are derived from the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this documentAnnual Report and should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and the notes thereto. The balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008, 2007 2006 and 20052006 and the statements of operations and cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 20062007 and 20052006 shown below were derived from previously issued financial statements, adjusted for applicable discontinued operations.operations and the Ibn Sina accounting change described below.
 
Ibn Sina
We indirectly own a 25% interest in Ibn Sina through CTE Petrochemicals Company (“CTE”), a venture with Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd. (which also indirectly owns 25%). The remaining interest in Ibn Sina is held by Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (“SABIC”). SABIC and CTE entered into the Ibn Sina joint venture agreement in 1981. In April 2010, we announced that Ibn Sina will construct a 50,000 ton POM production facility in Saudi Arabia and that the term of the joint venture agreement was extended until 2032. Ibn Sina’s existing natural gas supply contract expires in 2022. Upon successful startup of the POM facility, our indirect economic interest in Ibn Sina will increase from 25% to 32.5%. SABIC’s economic interest will remain unchanged.
In connection with this transaction, we reassessed the factors surrounding the accounting method for this investment and changed from the cost method of accounting for investments to the equity method of accounting for investments beginning April 1, 2010. Financial information relating to this investment for periods prior to 2010 has been retrospectively adjusted to apply the equity method of accounting.
In addition, effective April 1, 2010, we moved our investment in the Ibn Sina affiliate from our Acetyl Intermediates segment to our Advanced Engineered Materials segment to reflect the change in the affiliate’s business dynamics and growth opportunities as a result of the future construction of the POM facility.


3541


                    
                     Year Ended December 31,
 Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005    As Adjusted
 (In $ millions, except per share data)  (In $ millions, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data
                                        
Net sales  5,082   6,823   6,444   5,778   5,270   5,918   5,082   6,823   6,444   5,778 
Other (charges) gains, net  (136)  (108)  (58)  (10)  (61)  (46)  (136)  (108)  (58)  (10)
Operating profit  290   440   748   620   486   503   290   440   748   620 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  241   434   447   526   276   538   251   433   437   549 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  484   371   337   319   214   426   494   370   327   342 
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  4   (90)  90   87   63   (49)  4   (90)  90   87 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation  488   282   426   406   277   377   498   281   416   429 
Earnings (loss) per common share                                        
Continuing operations — basic  3.30   2.44   2.11   1.95   1.32   2.73   3.37   2.44   2.05   2.09 
Continuing operations — diluted  3.08   2.28   1.96   1.86   1.29   2.69   3.14   2.27   1.90   1.99 
Statement of Cash Flows Data
                    
Net cash provided by (used in):                    
Operating activities  596   586   566   751   701 
Investing activities  31   (201)  143   (268)  (907)
Financing activities  (112)  (499)  (714)  (108)  (144)
Balance Sheet Data (at the end of period)
                                        
Trade working capital(1)
  594   685   827   824   758   764   594   685   827   824 
Total assets  8,410   7,166   8,058   7,895   7,445   8,281   8,412   7,158   8,051   7,898 
Total debt  3,501   3,533   3,556   3,498   3,437   3,218   3,501   3,533   3,556   3,498 
Total Celanese Corporation shareholders’ equity (deficit)  584   182   1,062   787   235   926   586   174   1,055   790 
Other Financial Data
                                        
Depreciation and amortization  308   350   291   269   267   287   308   350   291   269 
Capital expenditures(2)
  167   267   306   244   203   222   167   267   306   244 
Cash basis dividends paid per common share  0.16   0.16   0.16   0.16   0.08 
Dividends paid per common share(3)
  0.18   0.16   0.16   0.16   0.16 
 
 
(1)Trade working capital is defined as trade accounts receivable from third parties and affiliates net of allowance for doubtful allowance for doubtful accounts, plus inventories, less trade accounts payable to third parties and affiliates. Trade working capital is calculated in the table below:
 
                                        
 As of December 31,  As of December 31,
 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005  2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Trade receivables, net  721   631   1,009   1,001   919    827    721    631    1,009    1,001 
Inventories  522   577   636   653   650    610     522    577    636    653 
Trade payables  (649)  (523)  (818)  (830)  (811)   (673   (649   (523   (818   (830
                     
Trade working capital  594   685   827   824   758    764    594    685    827    824 
                     
 
 
(2)Amounts include accrued capital expenditures. Amounts do not include capital expenditures related to capital lease obligations or capital expenditures related to the relocation of our Ticona plant in Kelsterbach. See Note 2524 and Note 2928 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
(3)Annual dividends for the year ended December 31, 2010 consists of two quarterly dividend payments of $0.04 and two quarterly dividend payments of $0.05 per share. In April 2010 the Board of Directors approved a 25% increase in our quarterly dividend rate from $0.04 to $0.05 per share of Series A common stock applicable to dividends payable beginning in August 2010.

36
42


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
In this Annual Report onForm 10-K (“Annual Report”), the term “Celanese” refers to Celanese Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and not its subsidiaries. The terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Celanese and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The term “Celanese US” refers to ourthe Company’s subsidiary, Celanese US Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly known as BCP Crystal US Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation, and not its subsidiaries. The term “Purchaser” refers to our subsidiary, Celanese Europe Holding GmbH & Co. KG, formerly known as BCP Crystal Acquisition GmbH & Co. KG, a German limited partnership, and not its subsidiaries, except where otherwise indicated.
 
You should read the following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and the results of operations together with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements, which were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).
 
Investors are cautioned that the forward-looking statements contained in this section involve both risk and uncertainty. Several important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by these statements. Many of these statements are macroeconomic in nature and are, therefore, beyond the control of management. See “Forward-Looking Statements May Prove Inaccurate” below.
 
Reconciliation of Non-US GAAP Measures: We believe that using non-US GAAP financial measures to supplement US GAAP results is useful to investors because such use provides a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting the business other than disclosing US GAAP results alone. In this regard, we disclose net debt, which is a non-US GAAP financial measure. Net debt is defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents. We use net debt to evaluate the capital structure. Net debt is not a substitute for any US GAAP financial measure. In addition, calculations of net debt contained in this report may not be consistent with that of other companies. The most directly comparable financial measure presented in accordance with US GAAP in our financial statements for net debt is total debt. For a reconciliation of net debt to total debt, see “Financial Highlights” below.
Forward-Looking Statements May Prove Inaccurate
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) and other parts of this Annual Report contain certain forward-looking statements and information relating to us that are based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, us. When used in this document, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and “project” and similar expressions, as they relate to us are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Further, certain forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate. We assume no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.
 
SeeItem 1A. Risk Factorsfor a description of certain risk factors that could significantly affect our financial results. In addition, the following factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things:
 
•       changes in general economic, business, political and regulatory conditions in the countries or regions in which we operate;
•       the length and depth of product and industry business cycles particularly in the automotive, electrical, electronics and construction industries;
•       changes in the price and availability of raw materials, particularly changes in the demand for, supply of, and market prices of ethylene, methanol, natural gas, wood pulp, fuel oil and electricity;
•       the ability to pass increases in raw material prices on to customers or otherwise improve margins through price increases;
•  changes in general economic, business, political and regulatory conditions in the countries or regions in which we operate;
•  the length and depth of product and industry business cycles particularly in the automotive, electrical, textiles, electronics and construction industries;
•  changes in the price and availability of raw materials, particularly changes in the demand for, supply of, and market prices of ethylene, methanol, natural gas, wood pulp and fuel oil and the prices for electricity and other energy sources;
•  the ability to pass increases in raw material prices on to customers or otherwise improve margins through price increases;
•  the ability to maintain plant utilization rates and to implement planned capacity additions and expansions;
•  the ability to reduce or maintain at their current levels production costs and improve productivity by implementing technological improvements to existing plants;
•  increased price competition and the introduction of competing products by other companies;
•  changes in the degree of intellectual property and other legal protection afforded to our products;


3743


•       the ability to maintain plant utilization rates and to implement planned capacity additions and expansions;
•       the ability to reduce production costs and improve productivity by implementing technological improvements to existing plants;
•       increased price competition and the introduction of competing products by other companies;
•       changes in the degree of intellectual property and other legal protection afforded to our products;
•       compliance costs and potential disruption or interruption of production due to accidents or other unforeseen events or delays in construction of facilities;
•       potential liability for remedial actions and increased costs under existing or future environmental regulations, including those related to climate change;
•       potential liability resulting from pending or future litigation, or from changes in the laws, regulations or policies of governments or other governmental activities in the countries in which we operate;
•       changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates; and
•       various other factors, both referenced and not referenced in this document.
•  costs and potential disruption or interruption of production due to accidents or other unforeseen events or delays in construction of facilities;
•  potential liability for remedial actions and increased costs under existing or future environmental regulations, including those related to climate change;
•  potential liability resulting from pending or future litigation, or from changes in the laws, regulations or policies of governments or other governmental activities in the countries in which we operate;
•  changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates; and
•  our level of indebtedness, which could diminish our ability to raise additional capital to fund operations or limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or the chemicals industry;
•  various other factors, both referenced and not referenced in this document.
 
Many of these factors are macroeconomic in nature and are, therefore, beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from those described in this Annual Report as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, planned or projected. We neither intend nor assume any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates.
 
Overview
 
During 2009,2010, we made significant progress in executing our strategic objectives. As detailed below, we optimized our portfolio, realigned our manufacturing footprint, continued our expansion efforts in Asia, improved our financing arrangements, made technological advancements, and took other strategic actions to deliver value for our shareholders.
 
20092010 Highlights:
 
•       We announced the Frankfurt, Germany Airport (“Fraport”) supervisory board approved the acceleration of the 2009 and 2010 payments of €200 million and €140 million, respectively, required by the settlement agreement signed in June 2007. On February 5, 2009, we received a discounted amount of approximately €322 million ($412 million), excluding value-added tax of €59 million ($75 million).
•       We shut down our vinyl acetate monomer (“VAM”) production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico, and ceased VAM production at the site during the first quarter of 2009.
•       Standard and Poor’s affirmed our ratings and revised our outlook from positive to stable in February 2009.
•       We received the American Chemistry Council’s (“ACC”) Responsible Care® Sustained Excellence Award for mid-size companies. The annual award, the most prestigious award given under ACC’s Responsible Care® initiative, recognizes companies for outstanding leadership under ACC’s Environmental Health and Safety performance criteria.
•       We completed the sale of our polyvinyl alcohol (“PVOH”) business to Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. for the net cash purchase price of $168 million.
•       We agreed to a “Project of Closure” for our acetic acid and VAM production operations at our Pardies, France facility. We ceased the production of acetic acid and VAM at our facility in Pardies, France on December 1, 2009. As a result of the Pardies, France Project of Closure, we have incurred $89 million of exit costs in 2009. We may incur an additional $17 million in contingent employee termination benefits relates to the Pardies, France Project of Closure.
•  We announced our newly developed advanced technology to produce ethanol. This innovative, new process combines our proprietary and leading acetyl platform with highly advanced manufacturing technology to produce ethanol from hydrocarbon-sourced feedstocks.
•  We launched VitalDosetm, an ethylene vinyl acetate (“EVA”) polymer-based excipient that facilitates drug makers’ efforts to develop and commercialize controlled-release pharmaceutical solutions.
•  We announced that Fortron Industries, LLC, one of our strategic affiliates, will increase its production at its Wilmington, North Carolina plant to meet an increased global demand for Fortron® polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”), a high-performance polymer used in demanding industrial applications. The Fortron Industries plant is the world’s largest linear PPS operation with a 15,000 metric ton annual capacity.
•  We announced a plan to close our acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations in Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom in the latter part of 2011. We expect the project to cost between $80 million and $120 million, with annual cash savings of $40 million to $60 million.
•  We completed an amendment and extension to our senior secured credit facility and completed an offering of $600 million of senior unsecured notes. We used the proceeds from the sale of the notes and $200 million of cash on hand to repay $800 million of borrowings under our term loan facility. These actions resulted in a reduction of our previous $2.7 billion term loan facility maturing in 2014 to $2.5 billion of secured and unsecured debt with staggered maturities in 2014, 2016 and 2018.
•  We acquired two product lines, Zenite® liquid crystal polymer (“LCP”) and Thermx® polycyclohexylene-dimethylene terephthalate (“PCT”), from DuPont Performance Polymers (“DuPont”).


3844


•       We announced that Celanese US had amended its $650 million revolving credit facility. The amendment lowered
•  We announced five-year Environmental Health and Safety sustainability goals for occupational safety performance, energy intensity, greenhouse gases and waste management intended to be achieved by the year 2015.
•  We received American Chemistry Council’s (“ACC”) 2010 Responsible Care Initiative of the Year Award. This award recognizes companies that demonstrate leadership in the areas of employee health and safety, security or environmental protection in the chemistry industry.
•  We announced the construction of a 50,000 ton polyacetal (“POM”) production facility by our National Methanol Company affiliate (“Ibn Sina”) in Saudi Arabia and extended the term of the joint venture, which will now run until 2032. Upon successful startup of the POM facility, our indirect economic interest in Ibn Sina will increase from 25% to a total of 32.5%.
•  We received formal approval of our previously announced plans to expand flake and tow capacities, each by 30,000 tons, at our affiliate facility in Nantong, China, with our affiliate partner, China National Tobacco Corporation.
•  We announced a 25% increase in our quarterly Series A common stock cash dividend beginning August 2010. Accordingly, the annual dividend rate increased from $0.16 to $0.20 per share of Series A common stock and the quarterly rate increased from $0.04 to $0.05 per share of Series A common stock.
•  We redeemed all of our Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock for Series A common stock on February 22, 2010.
2011 Outlook
Based on the total revolver commitment to $600 millionstrength of our 2010 performance, our confidence in our earnings growth programs and increased the first lien senior secured leverage ratioour expectations for a periodcontinued, modest global economic recovery, we expect 2011 results to improve as compared to 2010. We expect our unique portfolio of six quarters, beginning June 30, 2009technology and ending December 31, 2010.specialty materials businesses, coupled with our ongoing growth, innovation and productivity initiatives, will enable us to deliver earnings improvement. We anticipate healthy demand across all of our business segments and expect to see earnings growth in every segment in 2011.
 
•       We announced the creationIn January 2011, we signed letters of our newintent for projects to construct and proprietary AOPlus®2 acetic acid technology, which allows for expansion up to 1.5 million tons per reactor annually.
•       We successfully started up our expansion of our acetic acid unitoperate industrial ethanol production facilities in Nanjing, China, which doubledat the unit’s capacity from 600,000 tons to 1.2 million tons annually.
Nanjing Chemical Industrial Park, and in Zhuhai, China, at the Gaolan Port Economic Zone. We announced the expansion of our vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions (“VAE”) manufacturing facility at our Nanjing, China integrated chemical complex to support continued growth plans throughout Asia. The expanded facility will double our VAE capacity in the region and is expected to be operational in the first half of 2011.
•       We launched a new, innovative polyacetal (“POM”) technology that is expected to create significant additional growth opportunities for our Advanced Engineered Materials segment.
•       Wealso signed a memorandum of understanding with our acetate joint venture partner, the China National Tobacco Corporation, to expand the flake and tow capacities at our joint venture facility in Nantong, China.
•       We reached a long-term agreement to supply VAM to Jiangxi Jiangwei High-Tech StockWison (China) Holding Co., Ltd (“Jiangwei”). Jiangwei will ceaseLtd., a Chinese synthesis gas supplier, for production of its calcium carbide-based alternative for economic and environmental reasons and sourcecertain feedstocks used in our VAM.
•       We acquired the long fiber reinforced thermoplastics (“LFT”) business of FACT GmbH (Future Advanced Composites Technology) of Germany, supporting our Advanced Engineered Materials segment.
•       We announced the redemption of our Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock for our Series A Common Stock to be completed February 22, 2010.advanced ethanol production process.
 
Results of Operations
Ibn Sina
We indirectly own a 25% interest in Ibn Sina through CTE Petrochemicals Company (“CTE”), a joint venture with Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd. (which also indirectly owns 25%). The remaining interest in Ibn Sina is held by Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (“SABIC”). SABIC and CTE entered into the Ibn Sina joint venture agreement in 1981. In April 2010, Outlookwe announced that Ibn Sina will construct a 50,000 ton POM production facility in Saudi Arabia and that the term of the joint venture agreement was extended until 2032. Ibn Sina’s existing natural gas supply contract expires in 2022. Upon successful startup of the POM facility, our indirect economic interest in Ibn Sina will increase from 25% to 32.5%. SABIC’s economic interest will remain unchanged.
 
In 2010connection with this transaction, we expectreassessed the factors surrounding the accounting method for this investment and changed the accounting from the cost method of accounting for investments to see an increase in overall demand versus 2009 as the global economy begins a gradual recovery. We would also expect growth in Asiaequity method of accounting for investments beginning April 1, 2010. Financial information relating to outpace growth in other regionsthis investment for prior periods has been retrospectively adjusted to apply the equity method of the world. Raw materials and energy costs are expected to be modestly higher in 2010 than in the prior year. Additionally, we expect to realize an incremental $100 million of fixed spending reductions, driven by structural streamlining of our manufacturing and administrative functions.accounting.


3945


In addition, effective April 1, 2010, we moved our investment in the Ibn Sina affiliate from our Acetyl Intermediates segment to our Advanced Engineered Materials segment to reflect the change in the affiliate’s business dynamics and growth opportunities. Business segment information for prior periods included below has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the change and to conform to the current year presentation.
Financial Highlights
 
            
             Year Ended December 31,
 Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008
 2009 2008 2007    As Adjusted
 (In $ millions, except percentages)  (In $ millions, except percentages)
Statement of Operations Data
                        
Net sales  5,082   6,823   6,444   5,918   5,082   6,823 
Gross profit  1,003   1,256   1,445   1,180   1,003   1,256 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (469)  (540)  (516)  (505)  (474)  (545)
Other (charges) gains, net  (136)  (108)  (58)  (46)  (136)  (108)
Operating profit  290   440   748   503   290   440 
Equity in net earnings of affiliates  48   54   82   168   99   172 
Interest expense  (207)  (261)  (262)  (204)  (207)  (261)
Refinancing expenses  -   -   (256)
Refinancing expense  (16)  -   - 
Dividend income — cost investments  98   167   116   73   57   48 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  241   434   447   538   251   433 
Amounts attributable to Celanese Corporation                        
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  484   372   336   426   494   371 
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  4   (90)  90   (49)  4   (90)
      
Net earnings (loss)  488   282   426   377   498   281 
      
Other Data
                        
Depreciation and amortization  308   350   291   287   308   350 
Operating margin(1)
  5.7%  6.4%  11.6%
Earnings from continuing operations before tax as a percentage of net sales  4.7%  6.4%  6.9%  9.1 %  4.9 %  6.3 %
       
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Balance Sheet Data
      
Cash and cash equivalents  740   1,254 
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt — third party and affiliates  228   242 
Long-term debt  2,990   3,259 
       
Total debt  3,218   3,501 
       
 
Consolidated Results — Year Ended December 31, 2010 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2009
 
(1)Defined as operating profit divided by net sales.
         
  As of December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Balance Sheet Data
        
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt — third party and affiliates  242   233 
Plus: Long-term debt  3,259   3,300 
         
Total debt  3,501   3,533 
Less: Cash and cash equivalents  1,254   676 
         
Net debt    2,247     2,857 
         
During 2010 the global economy gradually began to recover from the challenging economic environment we experienced during the second half of 2008 and throughout 2009. Net sales increased in 2010 from 2009 primarily due to increased volumes as a result of the gradual recovery and increased selling prices across the majority of our business segments. The increase in net sales resulting from our acquisition of FACT GmbH (Future Advanced Composites Technology) (“FACT”) in December 2009 only slightly offset the decrease in net sales due to the sale of


46


our polyvinyl alcohol (“PVOH”) business in July 2009 within our Industrial Specialties segment. Unfavorable foreign currency impacts only slightly offset the increase in net sales.
Gross profit increased due to higher net sales. Gross profit as a percentage of sales remained consistent with prior year as increased pricing offset increased raw material and energy costs.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we wrote-off other productive assets of $18 million related to our Singapore and Nanjing, China facilities. In March 2010, we recorded $22 million of accelerated amortization to write-off the asset associated with a raw material purchase agreement with a supplier who filed for bankruptcy during 2009. The accelerated amortization was recorded as $20 million to our Acetyl Intermediates segment and $2 million to our Advanced Engineered Materials segment. Both the write-off of other productive assets and accelerated amortization were recorded to Cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased during 2010 primarily due to the increase in net sales and higher legal costs and costs associated with business optimization initiatives. As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses declined slightly as compared to 2009 due to our continued fixed spending reduction efforts, restructuring efficiencies and a positive impact from foreign currency.
Other (charges) gains, net decreased $90 million during 2010 as compared to 2009:
         
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Employee termination benefits  (32)  (105)
Plant/office closures  (4)  (17)
Asset impairments  (74)  (14)
Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation  (26)  (16)
Insurance recoveries, net  18   6 
Resolution of commercial disputes  13   - 
Plumbing actions  59   10 
         
Total Other (charges) gains, net  (46)  (136)
         
In March 2010, we concluded that certain long-lived assets were partially impaired at our acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations in Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom. Accordingly, we wrote down the related property, plant and equipment to its fair value of $31 million, resulting in long-lived asset impairment losses of $72 million during the year ended December 31, 2010. As a result of the announced closure of our acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations in Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom, we recorded $15 million of employee termination benefits during the year ended December 31, 2010.
As a result of our Pardies, France “Project of Closure”, we recorded exit costs of $12 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, which consisted of $6 million in employee termination benefits, $1 million of long-lived asset impairment losses, $2 million of contract termination costs and other plant closure costs and $3 million of reindustrialization costs.
Due to certain events in October 2008 and subsequent periodic cessations of production of our specialty polymers products produced at our EVA Performance Polymers facility in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, we declared two events of force majeure. During 2009, we replaced long-lived assets damaged in October 2008. As a result of these events and subsequent periodic cessations of production, we recorded $18 million of net insurance recoveries consisting of $8 million related to property damage and $10 million related to business interruption.


47


As a result of several business optimization projects undertaken by us beginning in 2009 and continuing throughout 2010, we recorded $11 million in employee termination costs during the year ended December 31, 2010.
During the year ended December 31, 2010 we recorded $14 million of recoveries and $45 million of reductions in legal reserves related to lawsuits alleging that certain plastics utilized in the production of plumbing systems for residential property were defective or caused such plumbing systems to fail. See Note 23 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the plumbing actions.
In November 2006, we finalized a settlement agreement with the Frankfurt, Germany Airport (“Fraport”) to relocate the Kelsterbach, Germany Ticona operations resolving several years of legal disputes related to the planned Fraport expansion. During 2010, we recorded $26 million of expenses related to the Ticona Kelsterbach relocation. See Note 28 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation.
Other charges for the year ended December 31, 2010 also included gains of $13 million, net, related to settlements in resolution of a commercial disputes.
Equity in net earnings of affiliates and dividend income from cost investments increased during 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Our strategic affiliates have experienced similar volume increases due to increased demand during the year ended December 31, 2010. As a result, our proportional share of net earnings from equity affiliates increased $69 million and our dividend income from cost investments increased $16 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009.
Our effective tax rate for continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 was 21% compared to (97)% for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our effective tax rate for 2009 was favorably impacted by the release of the US valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets, partially offset by increases in valuation allowances on certain foreign net deferred tax assets and the effect of new tax legislation in Mexico. The effective rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 was favorably impacted by amendments to tax legislation in Mexico.
 
Summary of Consolidated Results — Year Ended December 31, 2009 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2008
 
The challenging economic environment in the United States and Europe during the second half of 2008 continued throughout 2009. Net sales declined in 2009 from 2008 primarily as a result of decreased demand due to the significant weakness of the global economy. In July 2009, we completed the sale of our PVOH business which also contributed to the declines in our sales volumes. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we began to see a gradual recovery in the global economy with increasing demand within some of our business segments. A decrease in selling prices was also a significant factor on the decrease in net sales. Decreases in key raw material and energy costs were the primary factors in lower selling prices. A slightly unfavorable foreign currency impact also contributed to the decrease in net sales.


40


Gross profit declined due to lower net sales. As a percentage of sales, gross profit increased as lower raw material and energy costs more than offset decreases in net sales during the period. In 2010 we expect raw material and energy costs to increase which will partially be offset by increases in selling prices.
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased during 2009 primarily due to business optimization and finance improvement initiatives.


48


Other (charges) gains, net increased $28 million during 2009 as compared to 2008:
 
        
 Year Ended
         
 December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008  2009 2008
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Employee termination benefits    (105)  (21)  (105  (21
Plant/office closures  (17)  (7)  (17  (7
Plumbing actions  10   - 
Insurance recoveries associated with Clear Lake, Texas  6   38 
Asset impairments  (14)   (115)  (14  (115
Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation  (16)  (12)  (16  (12
Insurance recoveries, net  6   38 
Plumbing actions  10   - 
Sorbates antitrust actions  -   8   -   8 
Other  -   1   -   1 
         
Total Other (charges) gains, net  (136)  (108)  (136  (108
         
 
During the first quarter of 2009, we began efforts to align production capacity and staffing levels with our view of an economic environment of prolonged lower demand. For the year ended December 31, 2009, other charges included employee termination benefits of $40 million related to this endeavor. As a result of the shutdown of the vinyl acetate monomer (“VAM”) production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico, we recognized employee termination benefits of $1 million and long-lived asset impairment losses of $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2009. The VAM production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico is included in our Acetyl Intermediates segment.
 
As a result of the Project“Project of ClosureClosure” at our Pardies, France facility, other charges included exit costs of $89 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, which consisted of $60 million in employee termination benefits, $17 million of contract termination costs and $12 million of long-lived asset impairment losses. The Pardies, France facility is included in the Acetyl Intermediates segment.
 
Due to continued declines in demand in automotive and electronic sectors, we announced plans to reduce capacity by ceasing polyester polymer production at our Ticona manufacturing plant in Shelby, North Carolina. Other charges for the year ended December 31, 2009 included employee termination benefits of $2 million and long-lived asset impairment losses of $1 million related to this event. The Shelby, North Carolina facility is included in the Advanced Engineered Materials segment.
 
Other charges for the year ended December 31, 2009 was partially offset by $6 million of net insurance recoveries in satisfaction of claims we made related to the unplanned outage of our Clear Lake, Texas acetic acid facility during 2007, a $9 million decrease in legal reserves for plumbing claims due to the Company’s ongoing assessment of the likely outcome of the plumbing actions and the expiration of the statute of limitation.
 
Selling, general and administrativeIn November 2006, we finalized a settlement agreement with the Frankfurt, Germany Airport (“Fraport”) to relocate the Kelsterbach, Germany Ticona operations resolving several years of legal disputes related to the planned Fraport expansion. During 2009, we recorded $16 million of expenses decreased during 2009 primarily duerelated to business optimization and finance improvement initiatives.the Ticona Kelsterbach relocation.
 
Operating profit decreased due to lower gross profit and higher other charges partially offset by lower selling, general and administrative costs.
 
Equity in net earnings of affiliates decreased slightly during 2009, primarily due to reduced earnings from our Advanced Engineered Materials’ affiliates resulting from decreased demand.
 
Our effective tax rate for continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was (101)(97)% compared to 15% for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our effective tax rate for 2009 was favorably impacted by the release of the US valuation allowance, partially offset by lower earnings in jurisdictions participating in tax holidays, increases in valuation allowances on certain foreign net deferred tax assets and the effect of new tax legislation in Mexico.


41


Summary of Consolidated Results — Year Ended December 31, 2008 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2007
The challenging economic environment in the United States and Europe during the first half of 2008 resulted in higher raw material and energy costs which enabled price increase initiatives across all business segments. During the second half of 2008, the US credit crisis accelerated the economic slowdown and its spread to other regions of the world. Despite the halt in demand, we were able to maintain the majority of our enacted price increases through the remainder of 2008. As a result, increased prices improved net sales by 8%. Favorable foreign currency impacts also had a positive impact on net sales of 3%.
Net sales declined 5% due to decreased volumes. Lower volumes were primarily a result of decreased demand stemming from the global economic downturn. As demand declined, particularly during the fourth quarter of 2008, our customers began destocking to reduce their inventory levels. In response, we aggressively managed our global production capacity to align with the current environment. Decreased volumes in our acetate flake and tow businesses were not significantly impacted by the economic downturn. Rather, decreased flake volumes were the result of our strategic decision to shift our flake production to our China ventures, which we account for as cost investments.
Gross profit declined as higher raw material, energy and freight costs more than offset increases in net sales during the period. The uncertain economic environment resulted in higher natural gas, ethylene, methanol and other commodity prices during the first nine months of the year. Our freight costs also increased, primarily due to increased rates driven by higher energy prices. Late in 2008, raw material and energy prices declined.
Other (charges) gains, net increased $50 million during 2008 as compared to 2007:
         
  Year Ended
 
  December 31, 
  2008  2007 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Employee termination benefits  (21)  (32)
Plant/office closures  (7)  (11)
Deferred compensation triggered by Exit Event  -    (74)
Plumbing actions  -   4 
Insurance recoveries associated with Clear Lake, Texas  38   40 
Resolution of commercial disputes with a vendor  -   31 
Asset impairments    (115)  (9)
Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation  (12)  (5)
Sorbates antitrust actions  8   - 
Other  1   (2)
         
Total Other (charges) gains, net  (108)  (58)
         
Other charges increased in 2008 compared to 2007 and includes a long-lived asset impairment loss of $92 million in connection with the 2009 closure of our acetic acid and VAM production facility in Pardies, France, our VAM production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico and the potential closure of certain other facilities. This capacity reduction was necessitated by the significant change in the global economic environment and anticipated lower customer demand. Following the initial assessment of this capacity reduction, we shut down the Cangrejera VAM production unit in February 2009.
In addition, we recognized $23 million of long-lived asset impairment losses and $13 million of employee termination benefits in 2008 related to the shutdown of our Pampa, Texas facility.
During 2007, we fully impaired $6 million of goodwill related to our PVOH business.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $24 million during 2008 primarily due to business optimization and finance improvement initiatives.


42


Operating profit decreased due to lower gross profit and higher other charges and selling, general and administrative costs. The absence of a $34 million gain on the sale of our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada facility during 2007 also contributed to lower operating profit in 2008 as compared to 2007.
Equity in net earnings of affiliates decreased $28 million during 2008, primarily due to reduced earnings from our Advanced Engineered Materials’ affiliates resulting from higher raw material and energy costs and decreased demand. Our effective income tax rate for 2008 was 15% compared to 25% in 2007. The effective income tax rate decreased in 2008 due to: 1) a decrease in the valuation allowance, 2) tax credits generated on foreign jurisdictions and 3) the US tax impact of foreign operations.
The loss from discontinued operations of $90 million during 2008 primarily relates to a legal settlement agreement we entered into during 2008. Under the settlement agreement, we agreed to pay $107 million to resolve certain legacy items. Because the legal proceeding related to sales by the polyester staple fibers business which Hoechst AG sold to KoSa, Inc. in 1998, the impact of the settlement is reflected within discontinued operations in the current period. See the “Polyester Staple Antitrust Litigation” section in Note 24 of the consolidated financial statements.


4349


Selected Data by Business Segment — 2010 Compared with 2009 and 2009 Compared with 2008 and 2008 Compared with 2007
 
                        
                         Year Ended
   Year Ended
   
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,  December 31, Change
 December 31, Change
 
     Change
     Change
  2010 2009 in $ 2009 2008 in $ 
 2009 2008 in $ 2008 2007 in $    As Adjusted   As Adjusted   
     (In $ millions)      (In $ millions) 
Net sales
                                                
Advanced Engineered Materials  808   1,061   (253)  1,061   1,030   31    1,109    808    301    808    1,061    (253 
Consumer Specialties  1,084   1,155   (71)  1,155   1,111   44   1,098   1,084   14   1,084   1,155   (71) 
Industrial Specialties  974   1,406   (432)  1,406   1,346   60   1,036   974   62   974   1,406   (432) 
Acetyl Intermediates  2,603   3,875   (1,272)  3,875   3,615   260   3,082   2,603   479   2,603   3,875   (1,272) 
Other Activities  2   2   -   2   2   -   2   2   -   2   2   - 
Inter-segment Eliminations   (389)  (676)  287   (676)  (660)  (16)  (409   (389)   (20)   (389)   (676)   287 
                          
Total   5,082    6,823    (1,741)   6,823    6,444    379   5,918   5,082   836    5,082    6,823    (1,741 
                          
Other (charges) gains, net
                                                
Advanced Engineered Materials  (18)  (29)  11   (29)  (4)  (25)  31   (18)   49   (18)   (29)   11 
Consumer Specialties  (9)  (2)  (7)  (2)  (4)  2   (76)   (9)   (67)   (9)   (2)   (7) 
Industrial Specialties  4   (3)  7   (3)  (23)  20   25   4   21   4   (3)   7 
Acetyl Intermediates  (91)  (78)  (13)  (78)  72   (150)  (12)   (91)   79   (91)   (78)   (13) 
Other Activities  (22)  4   (26)  4   (99)  103   (14)   (22)   8   (22)   4   (26) 
                          
Total  (136)  (108)  (28)  (108)  (58)  (50)  (46)   (136)   90   (136)   (108)   (28) 
                          
Operating profit (loss)
                                                
Advanced Engineered Materials  35   32   3   32   133   (101)  186   38   148   38   37   1 
Consumer Specialties  231   190   41   190   199   (9)  164   231   (67)   231   190   41 
Industrial Specialties  89   47   42   47   28   19   89   89   -   89   47   42 
Acetyl Intermediates  95   309   (214)  309   616   (307)  243   92   151   92   304   (212) 
Other Activities  (160)  (138)  (22)  (138)  (228)  90   (179)   (160)   (19)   (160)   (138)   (22) 
                          
Total  290   440   (150)  440   748   (308)  503   290   213   290   440   (150) 
                          
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax
                                                
Advanced Engineered Materials  62   69   (7)  69   189   (120)  329   114   215   114   190   (76) 
Consumer Specialties  288   237   51   237   235   2   237   288   (51)   288   237   51 
Industrial Specialties  89   47   42   47   28   19   89   89   -   89   47   42 
Acetyl Intermediates  144   434   (290)  434   694   (260)  252   102   150   102   312   (210) 
Other Activities  (342)  (353)  11   (353)  (699)  346   (369)   (342)   (27)   (342)   (353)   11 
                          
Total  241   434   (193)  434   447   (13)  538   251   287   251   433   (182) 
                          
Depreciation and amortization
                                                
Advanced Engineered Materials  73   76   (3)  76   69   7   76   73   3   73   76   (3) 
Consumer Specialties  50   53   (3)  53   51   2   42   50   (8)   50   53   (3) 
Industrial Specialties  51   62   (11)  62   59   3   41   51   (10)   51   62   (11) 
Acetyl Intermediates  123   150   (27)  150   106   44   117   123   (6)   123   150   (27) 
Other Activities  11   9   2   9   6   3   11   11   -   11   9   2 
                          
Total  308   350   (42)  350   291   59   287   308   (21)   308   350   (42) 
                          
Operating margin(1)
                        
Advanced Engineered Materials  16.8 %  4.7 %  12.1 %  4.7 %  3.5 %  1.2 %
Consumer Specialties  14.9 %  21.3 %  (6.4)%  21.3 %  16.5 %  4.8 %
Industrial Specialties  8.6 %  9.1 %  (0.5)%  9.1 %  3.3 %  5.8 %
Acetyl Intermediates  7.9 %  3.5 %  4.4 %  3.5 %  7.8 %  (4.3)%
Total  8.5 %  5.7 %  2.8 %  5.7 %  6.4 %  (0.7)%
(1) Defined as operating profit (loss) divided by net sales.


4450


Factors Affecting Business Segment Net Sales
 
The table below sets forth the percentage increase (decrease) in net sales for the years ended December 31 attributable to each of the factors indicated for the following business segments.
 
                                    
 Volume Price Currency Other Total  Volume Price Currency Other Total 
 (In percentages)  (In percentages) 
2010 Compared to 2009                    
Advanced Engineered Materials  35   1   (3)  4 (2)  37 
Consumer Specialties  2   -   (1)  -   1 
Industrial Specialties  11   6   (3)  (8)(3)  6 
Acetyl Intermediates  10   10   (2)  -   18 
Total Company  13   7   (2)  (2)(1)  16 
2009 Compared to 2008                                        
Advanced Engineered Materials  (21)  (1)  (2)  -   (24)  (21)  (1)  (2)  -   (24)
Consumer Specialties  (12)  7   (1)  -   (6)  (12)  7   (1)  -   (6)
Industrial Specialties  (10)  (10)  (2)  (9)(2)  (31)  (10)  (10)  (2)  (9)(3)  (31)
Acetyl Intermediates  (6)  (26)  (1)  -   (33)  (6)  (26)  (1)  -   (33)
Total Company  (10)  (16)  (2)  2   (26)(1)  (10)  (16)  (2)  2 (1)  (26)
2008 Compared to 2007                    
Advanced Engineered Materials  (4)  3   4   -   3 
Consumer Specialties  (6)  7   1   2 (3)  4 
Industrial Specialties  (10)  11   4   (1)(4)  4 
Acetyl Intermediates  (3)  7   2   -   7 
Total Company  (5)  8   3   -   6 (1)
 
(1)Includes the effects of the captive insurance companies.companies and the impact of fluctuations in intersegment eliminations.
 
(2)Includes loss of sales related to2010 includes the saleeffects of the PVOH business on July 1, 2009.FACT and DuPont acquisitions.
 
(3)Includes net sales from2010 does not include the Acetate Products Limited (“APL”) acquisition.
(4)Includes loss of sales related to the saleeffects of the EVA Performance Polymers’ (f/k/a AT Plastics) Films business.PVOH business, which was sold on July 1, 2009.
 
Summary by Business Segment — Year Ended December 31, 20092010 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 20082009
 
Advanced Engineered Materials
 
            
             Year Ended December 31, Change
 Year Ended December 31, Change
  2010 2009 in $
 2009 2008 in $    As Adjusted  
 (In $ millions, except percentages)  (In $ millions, except percentages)
Net sales  808   1,061   (253)  1,109   808   301 
Net sales variance                        
Volume
  (21%          35 %        
Price
  (1)%          1 %        
Currency
  (2)%          (3)%        
Other
  0 %          4 %        
Operating profit  35   32   3   186   38   148 
Operating margin  4.3 %  3.0 %      16.8 %  4.7 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (18)   (29)   11   31   (18)  49 
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  144   78   66 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  62   69   (7)  329   114   215 
Depreciation and amortization  73   76   (3)  76   73   3 
 
Our Advanced Engineered Materials segment develops, produces and supplies a broad portfolio of high performance technicalspecialty polymers for application in automotive, medical and electronics products, as well as other consumer and industrial applications. Together with our strategic affiliates, we areour Advanced Engineered


51


Materials segment is a leading participant in the global technicalspecialty polymers industry. The primary products of Advanced Engineered Materials are polyacetal products (“POM”), polyphenylene sulfide (“PPS”), long fiberPOM, PPS, long-fiber reinforced thermoplastics (“LFRT”LFT”), polybutylene terephthalate (“PBT”), polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”), ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (“GUR®”) and liquid crystal polymers (“LCP”).LCP. POM, PPS, LFRT,LFT, PBT and PET are used in a broad range of products including automotive components, electronics, appliances and industrial applications. GUR® is used in battery separators, conveyor belts, filtration equipment, coatings and medical devices. Primary end markets for LCP are electrical and electronics.
 
Advanced Engineered Materials’ net sales increased $301 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in net sales is primarily related to significant increases in volume which are due to the gradual recovery in the global economy, continued success in the innovation and commercialization of new products and applications and the acquisition of FACT in December 2009. Net sales was also positively impacted by increases in average pricing as a result of implemented price increases in addition to integrating the DuPont product lines LCP and PCT that were acquired in May 2010 into our sales process during the fourth quarter. These increases were only partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
Operating profit increased $148 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The positive impact from higher sales volumes, increased pricing for our high performance polymers and higher production volumes, including a planned inventory build for the relocation of our facility in Kelsterbach, Germany, more than offset higher raw material and energy costs. Other charges positively impacted operating profit for the year ended December 31, 2010 driven by a $45 million decrease in legal reserves and $14 million of recoveries associated with plumbing actions partially offset by expenses related to our European expansion and Kelsterbach relocation. Depreciation and amortization includes $2 million of accelerated amortization for the year ended December 31, 2010 to write-off the asset associated with a raw material purchase agreement with a supplier who filed for bankruptcy during 2009.
Earnings from continuing operations before tax increased for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 due to increased operating profit and increased equity in net earnings of affiliates. Our equity affiliates, including Ibn Sina, have experienced similar volume increases due to increased demand during the year ended December 31, 2010. As a result, our proportional share of net earnings of these affiliates increased $66 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
The economic outlook within the automotive and electronic industries continues to look favorable entering into 2011 with seasonally strong demand. We are anticipating a continued strongvalue-in-use pricing environment supported by higher raw material costs. As we progress with the relocation of our Kelsterbach, Germany operations and expansion of capacity in Europe, we will continue to build inventory to support our customers in their product qualification process.


52


Consumer Specialties
             
  Year Ended December 31, Change
  2010 2009 in $
  (In $ millions, except percentages)
 
Net sales  1,098   1,084   14 
Net sales variance            
Volume
  2 %        
Price
  - %        
Currency
  (1)%        
Other
  - %        
Operating profit  164   231   (67)
Operating margin  14.9 %  21.3 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (76)  (9)  (67)
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  2   1   1 
Dividend income — cost investments  71   56   15 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  237   288   (51)
Depreciation and amortization  42   50   (8)
Our Consumer Specialties segment consists of our Acetate Products and Nutrinova businesses. Our Acetate Products business primarily produces and supplies acetate tow, which is used in the production of filter products. We also produce acetate flake, which is processed into acetate tow and acetate film. Our Nutrinova business produces and sells Sunett®, a high intensity sweetener, and food protection ingredients, such as sorbates and sorbic acid, for the food, beverage and pharmaceuticals industries.
Net sales for Consumer Specialties increased $14 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in volume and price in our Acetate Products business more than offset the decline in volume and price in our Nutrinova business as lower demand in Sunett® negatively impacted net sales.
During the first half of 2010, we experienced a decline in net sales related to an electrical disruption and subsequent production outage at our Acetate Products manufacturing facility in Narrows, Virginia. The facility resumed normal operations during the second quarter of 2010 and we recovered the impacted volume during the second half of 2010 as we experienced increased volumes in our Acetate Products business due to higher demand in acetate tow and improved business in acetate film.
Operating profit decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. An increase in other charges for the year ended December 31, 2010 had the most significant impact on operating profit as it was unfavorably impacted by long-lived asset impairment losses of $72 million associated with management’s assessment of the closure of our acetate flake and tow production operations in Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, earnings from continuing operations before tax decreased due to lower operating profit, which was partially offset by higher dividends from our China ventures of $15 million compared to 2009.
We expect demand to be relatively flat during the first quarter of 2011; however, slightly lower sales are expected due to seasonal trends. Margin expansion driven by sustainable productivity initiatives is expected to continue in 2011. In addition, we expect spending to be higher during the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010 due to plant turnaround costs.


53


Industrial Specialties
             
  Year Ended December 31, Change
  2010 2009 in $
  (In $ millions, except percentages)
 
Net sales  1,036   974   62 
Net sales variance            
Volume
  11 %        
Price
  6 %        
Currency
  (3)%        
Other
  (8)%        
Operating profit  89   89   - 
Operating margin  8.6 %  9.1 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  25   4   21 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  89   89   - 
Depreciation and amortization  41   51   (10)
Our Industrial Specialties segment includes our Emulsions and EVA Performance Polymers businesses. Our Emulsions business is a global leader that produces a broad product portfolio, specializing in vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions, and is a recognized authority on low volatile organic compounds, an environmentally-friendly technology. Our emulsions products are used in a wide array of applications including paints and coatings, adhesives, construction, glass fiber, textiles and paper. EVA Performance Polymers business offers a complete line of low-density polyethylene and specialty EVA resins and compounds. EVA Performance Polymers’ products are used in many applications including flexible packaging films, lamination film products, hot melt adhesives, medical devices and tubing, automotive carpeting and solar cell encapsulation films.
In July 2009, we completed the sale of our PVOH business to Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. (“Sekisui”) for a net cash purchase price of $168 million, excluding the value of accounts receivable and payable we retained. The transaction resulted in a gain on disposition of $34 million and includes long-term supply agreements between Sekisui and Celanese.
Net sales increased for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Increased net sales were a result of higher growth and innovation volumes from our Emulsions business and higher volumes from our EVA Performance Polymers business partially offset by impacts resulting from the sale of our PVOH business in July 2009. The increase in our EVA Performance Polymers business’ volumes was partly as a result of our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada plant being fully operational during 2010. Volumes were lower during 2009 due to technical issues at our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada plant. Such technical production issues were resolved and normal operations resumed prior to the end of the third quarter of 2009. Higher prices in our EVA Performance Polymers business due to price increases and favorable product mix were partially offset by lower prices in our Emulsions business due to unfavorable foreign exchange rates.
Due to certain events in October 2008 and subsequent periodic cessations of production of our specialty polymers products produced at our EVA Performance Polymers facility in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, we declared two events of force majeure. During 2009, we replaced long-lived assets damaged in October 2008. As a result of these events and subsequent periodic cessation of production, we recorded $25 million and $10 million of insurance recoveries to other charges during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These amounts were partially offset by $7 million and $10 million, respectively, recorded as a charge by our captive insurance companies included in the Other Activities segment. The net insurance recoveries recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010 of $18 million consisted of $8 million related to property damage and $10 million related to business interruption.
Operating profit remained unchanged for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Increases in operating profit in 2010 are primarily due to the resumption of normal operations at our EVA


54


Performance Polymers facility, net insurance proceeds received in 2010 and increases in sales volumes and prices. These increases were offset by the 2009 gain on disposition of assets related to the divestiture of our PVOH business and higher raw material costs in both our EVA Performance Polymers and Emulsions businesses.
In 2011 we expect to see positive industry conditions with volume demands continuing to increase from those levels experienced in 2010. We also anticipate margin expansion due to a robust pricing environment and higher margins on new products.
Acetyl Intermediates
             
  Year Ended December 31, Change
  2010 2009 in $
    As Adjusted  
  (In $ millions, except percentages)
 
Net sales  3,082   2,603   479 
Net sales variance            
Volume
  10 %        
Price
  10 %        
Currency
  (2)%        
Other
  - %        
Operating profit  243   92   151 
Operating margin  7.9 %  3.5 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (12)  (91)  79 
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  5   5   - 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  252   102   150 
Depreciation and amortization  117   123   (6)
Our Acetyl Intermediates segment produces and supplies acetyl products, including acetic acid, VAM, acetic anhydride and acetate esters. These products are generally used as starting materials for colorants, paints, adhesives, coatings, textiles, medicines and more. Other chemicals produced in this business segment are organic solvents and intermediates for pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical products. To meet the growing demand for acetic acid in China and to support ongoing site optimization efforts, we successfully expanded our acetic acid unit in Nanjing, China from 600,000 tons per reactor annually to 1.2 million tons per reactor annually during the fourth quarter of 2009. Using new AOPlus®2 capability, the acetic acid unit could be further expanded to 1.5 million tons per reactor annually with only modest additional capital.
Acetyl Intermediates’ net sales increased $479 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 due to improvement in the global economy resulting in increased overall demand across all regions for the major acetyl derivative product lines. Increases in volume were also a direct result of our successful acetic acid expansion at our Nanjing, China plant. We also experienced favorable pricing which was driven by rising raw material costs and price increases in acetic acid and VAM across all regions. The increase in net sales was only slightly offset by unfavorable foreign currency impacts.
Operating profit increased during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in operating profit is primarily due to higher volumes and prices and reduction in plant costs resulting from the closure of our less advantaged acetic acid and VAM production operations in Pardies, France. A decrease in other charges, due primarily to the reduction of plant closure costs related to the 2009 closure of our Pardies, France facility, also had a favorable impact on operating profit. These increases to operating profit were only slightly offset by higher variable costs and unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Higher variable costs were a direct result of price increases in all major raw materials. Depreciation and amortization includes $20 million of accelerated amortization for the year ended December 31, 2010 to write-off the asset associated with a raw material purchase agreement with a supplier who filed for bankruptcy during 2009.


55


Earnings from continuing operations before tax increased during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 due to increased operating profit.
Entering into 2011, we expect to see a relatively flat first quarter. Decreasing volumes in Asia as a result of the Chinese new year are expected to offset seasonal increases in demand in the US and Europe. Overall growth in Asia for 2011 is anticipated. In addition, our advanced acetyl technology is expected to sustain acetic acid margins and process innovation and productivity are expected to positively impact 2011.
Other Activities
Other Activities primarily consists of corporate center costs, including financing and administrative activities, and our captive insurance companies.
The operating loss for Other Activities increased $19 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to a $38 million increase in selling, general and administrative costs, which was only partially offset by a $14 million gain on the sale of an office building. Higher selling, general and administrative expenses were primarily due to higher legal costs and costs associated with business optimization initiatives.
The loss from continuing operations before tax increased $27 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily related to $16 million of fees associated with our debt refinancing that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Business Segment — Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2008
Advanced Engineered Materials
             
  Year Ended December 31, Change
  2009 2008 in $
  As Adjusted  
  (In $ millions, except percentages)
 
Net sales  808   1,061   (253)
Net sales variance            
Volume
  (21)%        
Price
  (1)%        
Currency
  (2)%        
Other
  - %        
Operating profit  38   37   1 
Operating margin  4.7 %  3.5 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (18)  (29)  11 
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  78   155   (77)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  114   190   (76)
Depreciation and amortization  73   76   (3)
Net sales decreased during 2009 compared to 2008 primarily as a result of lower sales volumes. Significant weakness in the global economy experienced during the first half of the year resulted in a dramatic decline in demand for


45


automotive, electrical and electronic products as well as for other industrial products. As a result, sales volumes dropped significantly across all product lines. During the second half of 2009, we experienced a continued increase in demand compared with the first half of the year as a result of programs like “Cash for Clunkers” in the United States during the third quarter of 2009 and a gradual recovery in the global economy during the fourth quarter of 2009. Demand for the first quarter of 2010 is expected to see continued improvement due to seasonality, with production being reduced in many areas in December due to the holidays, and continued improvement in the global economy.


56


Operating profit increased in 2009 as compared to 2008. Lower raw material and energy costs and decreased overall spending more than offset the decline in net sales. Decreased overall spending was the result of our fixed spending reduction efforts. Non-capital spending incurred on the relocation of our Ticona Kelsterbach plant was flat compared to 2008. For moreSee Note 28 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation, see Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements.relocation.
 
Earnings from continuing operations before tax was down due to a drop in equity in net earnings of affiliates as compared to 2008. Equity in net earnings of affiliates was lower in 2009 primarily due to reduced earnings from our Advanced Engineered Materials’ affiliates resulting from decreased demand and a biennial shutdown at one of our affiliate’s plants.
 
Consumer Specialties
 
                        
 Year Ended December 31, Change
  Year Ended December 31, Change
 2009 2008 in $  2009 2008 in $
 (In $ millions, except percentages)  (In $ millions, except percentages)
Net sales  1,084   1,155   (71)  1,084   1,155   (71)
Net sales variance                        
Volume
  (12%          (12)%        
Price
  7 %          7 %        
Currency
  (1)%          (1)%        
Other
  0 %          - %        
Operating profit  231   190   41   231   190   41 
Operating margin  21.3 %  16.4  %      21.3 %  16.5 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (9)   (2)   (7)  (9)  (2)  (7)
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  1   -   1 
Dividend income — cost investments  56   46   10 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  288   237   51   288   237   51 
Depreciation and amortization  50   53   (3)  50   53   (3)
Our Consumer Specialties segment consists of our Acetate Products and Nutrinova businesses. Our Acetate Products business primarily produces and supplies acetate tow, which is used in the production of filter products. We also produce acetate flake, which is processed into acetate fiber in the form of a tow band. Our Nutrinova business produces and sells Sunett®, a high intensity sweetener, and food protection ingredients, such as sorbates, for the food, beverage and pharmaceuticals industries.
 
Net sales decreased $71 million during 2009 when compared with 2008. The decrease in net sales was driven primarily by decreased volume due to softening demand largely in tow with less significant decreases experienced in flake. Decreased volumes were primarily due to weakness in underlying demand resulting from the global economic downturn. The decrease in volume was partially offset by an increase in selling prices. A slightly unfavorable foreign currency impact also contributed to the decrease in net sales.
 
Operating profit increased from $190 million in 2008 to $231 million in 2009. Fixed cost reduction efforts, improved energy costs and a favorable currency impact on costs had a significant impact on the increase to operating profit.
 
Earnings from continuing operations before tax of $288 million increased from 2008 primarily due to the increase in operating profit and an increase in dividends from our China ventures of $9$10 million. Increased dividends are the result of increased volumes and higher prices, as well as efficiency improvements.


4657


Industrial Specialties
 
                       
 Year Ended December 31, Change
  Year Ended December 31, Change
 2009 2008 in $  2009 2008 in $
 (In $ millions, except percentages)  (In $ millions, except percentages)
Net sales  974   1,406   (432)  974   1,406   (432)
Net sales variance                        
Volume
  (10%          (10)%        
Price
  (10)%          (10)%        
Currency
  (2)%          (2)%        
Other
  (9)%          (9)%        
Operating profit  89   47   42   89   47   42 
Operating margin  9.1 %  3.3 %      9.1 %  3.3 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  4   (3   7   4   (3)  7 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  89   47   42   89   47   42 
Depreciation and amortization  51   62   (11)  51   62   (11)
Our Industrial Specialties segment includes our Emulsions, PVOH and EVA Performance Polymers businesses. Our Emulsions business is a global leader which produces a broad range of products, specializing in vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions, and is a recognized authority on low volatile organic compounds (“VOC”), an environmentally-friendly technology. As a global leader, our PVOH business produced a broad portfolio of performance PVOH chemicals engineered to meet specific customer requirements. Our emulsions and PVOH products are used in a wide array of applications including paints and coatings, adhesives, construction, glass fiber, textiles and paper. EVA Performance Polymers offers a complete line of low-density polyethylene and specialty ethylene vinyl acetate resins and compounds. EVA Performance Polymers’ products are used in many applications including flexible packaging films, lamination film products, hot melt adhesives, medical tubing, automotive carpeting and solar cell encapsulation films.
In July 2009, we completed the sale of our PVOH business to Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. (“Sekisui”) for a net cash purchase price of $168 million. The transaction resulted in a gain on disposition of $34 million and includes long-term supply agreements between Sekisui and Celanese.
 
Net sales declined $432 million during 2009 compared to 2008 primarily due to the sale of our PVOH business and lower demand due to the economic downturn. The decline in our emulsions volumes was concentrated in North America and Europe, offset partially by volume increases in Asia. EVA Performance Polymers’ volumes declined due to the impact of the force majeure event at our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada plant which is offset in other charges in our Other Activities segment. Repairs to the plant were completed at the end of the second quarter 2009 and normal operations have resumed. Net sales were also down from prior year as a result ofBoth decreases in key raw material costs resulting in lower selling prices. Unfavorableprices and unfavorable currency impacts also contributed to the decline in net sales during the year.for 2009 compared to 2008.
 
Operating profit increased $42 million in 2009 compared to 2008 as decreases in volume and selling prices were more than offset by lower raw material and energy costs and reduced overall spending. Reduced spending is attributable to our fixed spending reduction efforts, restructuring efficiencies and favorable foreign currency impacts on costs. Energy is favorable due to lower natural gas costs and lower usage resulting from a decline in volumes. Our EVA Performance Polymers business contributed to the increase in Other (charges) gains, net as a result of receiving $10 million in insurance recoveries in partial satisfaction of the losses resulting from the force majeure event at our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada plant. The gain on the sale of our PVOH business of $34 million had a significant impact to the increase in operating profit. DeprecationDepreciation and amortization also had a favorable impact on operating profit due to the PVOH divestiture and the shutdown of our Warrington, UK emulsions facility.


4758


Acetyl Intermediates
 
            
            Year Ended December 31, Change
 Year Ended December 31, Change
  2009 2008 in $
 2009 2008 in $  As Adjusted  
 (In $ millions, except percentages)  (In $ millions, except percentages)
Net sales  2,603   3,875   (1,272)   2,603    3,875    (1,272
Net sales variance                        
Volume
  (6%           (6)%         
Price
  (26)%           (26)%         
Currency
  (1)%           (1)%         
Other
  0 %          - %        
Operating profit  95   309   (214)   92    304    (212
Operating margin  3.6 %  8.0 %       3.5 %   7.8 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (91)   (78   (13)   (91   (78   (13
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates   5    3    2 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  144   434   (290)   102    312    (210
Depreciation and amortization  123   150   (27)   123    150    (27
Our Acetyl Intermediates segment produces and supplies acetyl products, including acetic acid, VAM, acetic anhydride and acetate esters. These products are generally used as starting materials for colorants, paints, adhesives, coatings, textiles, medicines and more. Other chemicals produced in this business segment are organic solvents and intermediates for pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical products. To meet the growing demand for acetic acid in China and ongoing site optimization efforts, we successfully expanded our acetic acid unit in Nanjing, China from 600,000 tons per reactor annually to 1.2 million tons per reactor annually. Using new AOPlus®2 capability, the acetic acid unit could be further expanded to 1.5 million tons per reactor annually with only modest additional capital.
 
Net sales decreased 33% during 2009 as compared to 2008 primarily due to lower selling prices across all regions and major product lines, lower volumes and unfavorable foreign currency impacts. Lower volumes were driven by a reduction in underlying demand in Europe and in the Americas, which was only partially offset by significant increases in demand in Asia. Lower pricing was driven by lower raw material and energy prices, which also negatively impacted our formula-based pricing arrangements for VAM in the US. There were a number of production issues in Asia among the major acetic acid producers (other than Celanese), which coupled with planned outages, caused periodic and short-term market tightness. In 2010, sales are expected to see increases as compared to the corresponding periods in the prior year as the global economy begins to slowly recover. Sales volumes for the first quarter of 2010 are expected to be in line with the fourth quarter of 2009 as expected improvements in demand in the US are partially offset by expected reductions in Asia due to seasonal demand reductions for the Chinese New Year.
 
Operating profit declined $214$212 million primarily as a result of lower prices across all regions and major product lines. Significantly lower realized pricing was partially offset by favorable raw material and energy prices, reduced spending due to the shutdown of our Pampa, Texas facility and other reductions in fixed spending. Depreciation and amortization expense declined primarily as a result of the long-lived asset impairment losses recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008 related to our acetic acid and VAM production facility in Pardies, France, the closure of our VAM production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico in February 2009, together with lower depreciation expense resulting from the shutdown of our Pampa, Texas facility. Our operating profit was also negatively impacted by a $13 million increase in Other charges negatively impacted our operating profit by increasing $13 million from prior year which relatesfor 2009 compared to 2008, relating primarily to the planned shutdown of our Pardies, France facility. Margins are expected to be lower in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2009 due to increasing competition and expected increases in raw material costs.
 
EarningsThe decrease in earnings from continuing operations before tax differs fromof $210 million is consistent with the decline in operating profit primarily as a result of dividend income from our cost investment, National Methanol Co. (“Ibn Sina”). Dividend income from Ibn Sina declined to $41 million in 2009 as a result of lower earnings from declining margins for methanol and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (“MTBE”).profit.


48


Other Activities
Other Activities primarily consists of corporate center costs, including financing and administrative activities, and our captive insurance companies.
 
Net sales remained flat in 2009 as compared to 2008. We do not expect third-party revenues from our captive insurance companies to increase significantly in the near future.
 
The operating loss for Other Activities increased from an operating loss of $138 million in 2008 to an operating loss of $160 million in 2009. The increase was primarily related to higher other charges. The increase in other charges was related to insurance retention costs as a result of our force majeure event at our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada plant which is offset in our Industrial Specialties segment and severance costs as a result of business optimization and finance improvement initiatives. The increase in other charges was partially offset by lower selling, general and administrative expenses primarily attributable to our fixed spending reduction efforts and restructuring efficiencies.


59


The loss from continuing operations before tax decreased $11 million in 2009 compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily due to reduced interest expense resulting from lower interest rates on our senior credit facilities and favorable currency impact.
 
Summary by Business Segment — Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2007
Advanced Engineered Materials
               
  Year Ended December 31,   Change
 
  2008   2007   in $ 
  (In $ millions, except percentages) 
 
Net sales  1,061    1,030    31 
Net sales variance              
Volume
  (4%         
Price
  3 %         
Currency
  4 %         
Other
  0 %         
Operating profit  32    133    (101)
Operating margin  3.0 %  12.9 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (29)   (4   (25)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  69    189    (120)
Depreciation and amortization  76    69    7 
Advanced Engineered Materials’ net sales increased 3% during 2008 as compared to 2007 primarily as a result of implemented pricing increases combined with favorable foreign currency impacts. Increases in net sales were partially offset by lower volumes due to significant weakness in the US and European automotive and housing industries. Extended plant shutdowns enacted by major car manufacturers during the fourth quarter of 2008 contributed significantly to the volume decline.
Operating profit declined $101 million primarily due to higher raw material, freight and energy costs. Raw material costs increased on higher prices while freight costs increased as a result of increased freight rates and larger shipments to Asia. Raw material costs declined late in 2008 though at year end we held higher-cost inventories while inventory destocking continued. Higher depreciation and amortization expense and increased other charges also contributed to lower operating profit. Depreciation and amortization expense are higher in 2008 due to thestart-up of the GUR® and LFRT units in Asia. Other charges consist primarily of a $16 million long-lived asset impairment loss related to certain Advanced Engineered Materials’ facilities and $12 million related to the relocation of our Ticona plant in Kelsterbach. See Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on the Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation.


49


Earnings from continuing operations before tax decreased due to decreased operating profit and decreased equity in net earnings of affiliates. Equity in net earnings of affiliates decreased $18 million during 2008, primarily due to reduced earnings from our Advanced Engineered Materials’ affiliates resulting from higher raw material and energy costs and decreased demand.
Consumer Specialties
               
  Year Ended December 31,   Change
 
  2008   2007   in $ 
  (In $ millions, except percentages) 
 
Net sales  1,155    1,111    44 
Net sales variance              
Volume
  (6%         
Price
  7 %         
Currency
  1 %         
Other
  2 %         
Operating profit  190    199    (9)
Operating margin  16.4 %  17.9 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (2)   (4   2 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  237    235    2 
Depreciation and amortization  53    51    2 
Consumer Specialties’ net sales increased 4% to $1,155 million during the year ended December 31, 2008 driven primarily by pricing actions in our Acetate Products business and an additional month of sales from our APL acquisition, which was acquired on January 31, 2007, offset by lower volumes. Lower volumes are a direct result of our strategic decision to shift acetate flake production to our China ventures, which are accounted for as cost method investments. The full impact of this shift has been realized during 2008 and thus the resulting trend of diminishing volumes is not expected to continue. Lower flake volumes were partially offset by a 5% increase in tow volumes as we were able to capture a portion of the growth in global tow demand.
The increase in net sales due to higher sales prices during 2008 was offset most significantly by higher energy costs, and to a lesser extent, higher raw material and freight costs. Operating profit, as compared to 2007, declined primarily due to the absence of a $22 million gain on the sale of our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada facility in 2007. Other charges during 2007 includes $3 million of deferred compensation plan expenses and $5 million of other restructuring charges, offset by insurance recoveries of $5 million in partial satisfaction of the business interruption losses resulting from the temporary unplanned outage of the acetic acid unit at our Clear Lake, Texas facility.
Earnings from continuing operations before tax of $237 million increased from 2007 as increased dividends from our China ventures more than offset the decline in operating profit. Increased dividends are the result of increased volumes and higher prices, as well as efficiency improvements.


50


Industrial Specialties
               
  Year Ended December 31,   Change
 
  2008   2007   in $ 
  (In $ millions, except percentages) 
 
Net sales  1,406    1,346    60 
Net sales variance              
Volume
  (10%         
Price
  11 %         
Currency
  4 %         
Other
  (1)%         
Operating profit  47    28    19 
Operating margin  3.3 %  2.1 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (3)   (23   20 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  47    28    19 
Depreciation and amortization  62    59    3 
Industrial Specialties’ net sales increased by 4% during 2008 as increased prices and favorable foreign currency impacts more than offset volume reductions. Pricing actions implemented by all business lines late in 2007 and during 2008 contributed to the increase in net sales. Volumes declined primarily on decreased demand across all regions due to the global economic downturn combined with the temporary shutdown of our EVA Performance Polymers plant late in 2008. The overall volume decline was partially offset by increased emulsions volumes at our Nanjing, China facility, which began operating late in 2008.
Increased net sales were more than offset by higher raw material and energy costs during 2008. The $19 million increase in operating profit was primarily due to lower other charges and the absence of the $7 million loss on the divestiture of our EVA Performance Polymers’ Films business in 2007. During 2007, we initiated a plan to simplify and optimize our Emulsions and PVOH businesses to focus on technology and innovation. Other charges during 2008 includes a charge of $3 million for employee termination benefits and accelerated depreciation related to this plan. Other charges during 2007 includes a charge of $14 million for employee termination benefits, $3 million for an impairment of long-lived assets and $5 million of accelerated depreciation expense for our shuttered United Kingdom plant related to this plan. Other charges in 2007 also include $6 million of goodwill impairment and receipt of $7 million in insurance recoveries in partial satisfaction of the business interruption losses resulting from the temporary unplanned outage of the acetic acid unit at our Clear Lake, Texas facility.
Acetyl Intermediates
               
  Year Ended December 31,   Change
 
  2008   2007   in $ 
  (In $ millions, except percentages) 
 
Net sales  3,875    3,615    260 
Net sales variance              
Volume
  (3%         
Price
  7 %         
Currency
  3 %         
Other
  0 %         
Operating profit  309    616    (307)
Operating margin  8.0 %  17.0 %    
Other (charges) gains, net  (78)   72    (150)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  434    694    (260)
Depreciation and amortization  150    106    44 


51


Acetyl Intermediates’ net sales increased by 7% during 2008 primarily due to increased prices and favorable foreign currency impacts, partially offset by lower volumes. Our formula-based pricing arrangements benefited from higher ethylene and methanol costs during the first nine months of 2008. Market tightness in the Americas and favorable foreign currency impacts in Europe also contributed to the increase in net sales. Reduced volumes offset the increase in net sales as the slowdown of the global economy caused customers to slow production and diminish current inventory levels, particularly in Asia during the fourth quarter. Ethylene and methanol prices decreased during the fourth quarter of 2008 on slowed global demand.
Operating profit declined $307 million primarily as a result of higher ethylene, methanol and energy prices, increased other charges, increased depreciation and amortization and the absence of a $12 million gain on the sale of our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada facility in 2007. Other charges increased during 2008 partially due to $76 million of long-lived asset impairment losses recognized in 2008 related to the closure of our acetic acid and VAM production facility in Pardies, France, our VAM production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico (which we shut down effective February 2009) and the potential shutdown of certain other facilities. Other charges in 2008 also includes $23 million of long-lived asset impairment losses and $13 million of severance and retention charges related to the shutdown of our Pampa, Texas facility. Also contributing to the increase was the absence of a one-time payment of $31 million received in 2007 in resolution of commercial disputes with a vendor and a $25 million decrease in insurance recoveries received in partial satisfaction of the losses resulting from the temporary unplanned outage of the acetic acid unit at our Clear Lake, Texas facility. Increased depreciation and amortization expense during 2008 is the result of accelerated depreciation associated with the shutdown of our Pampa, Texas facility and a full year of depreciation for our acetic acid plant in Nanjing, China, which started up in mid-2007.
Earnings from continuing operations before tax differs from operating profit primarily as a result of dividend income from our cost investment, National Methanol Co. (“Ibn Sina”). Increased dividend income of $41 million during 2008 had a positive impact on earnings from continuing operations before tax. Ibn Sina increased their dividends as a result of higher earnings from expanding margins for methanol and MTBE.
Other Activities
Net sales for Other Activities remained flat in 2008 as compared to 2007. We do not expect third-party revenues from our captive insurance companies to increase significantly in the near future.
The operating loss for Other Activities improved $90 million during 2008 as compared to 2007 due to lower other charges, partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses. Other charges decreased principally due to the release of reserves related to the Sorbates antitrust actions settlement of $8 million and the absence of $59 million of deferred compensation plan costs which were incurred during 2007. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased due to additional spending on business optimization and finance improvement initiatives during 2008.
The loss from continuing operations before tax decreased $346 million during 2008. The significant decrease was primarily due to the absence of $256 million of refinancing costs incurred in 2007 and the decrease in the operating loss discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our primary source of liquidity is cash generated from operations, available cash and cash equivalents and dividends from our portfolio of strategic investments. In addition, as of December 31, 2010 we have a $600 million revolving credit facility and $140$145 million available for borrowing under our credit-linked revolving facility and $600 million available under our revolving credit facility to assist, if required, in meeting our working capital needs and other contractual obligations. In excess of 20We have 17 lenders who participate in our revolving credit facility, each with a commitment of not more than 10% of the $600 million commitment.
 
While our contractual obligations, commitments and debt service requirements over the next several years are significant, we continue to believe we will have available resources to meet our liquidity requirements, including debt service, in 2010.2011. If our cash flow from operations is insufficient to fund our debt service and other obligations, we may be required to use other means available to us such as increasing our borrowings, reducing or delaying capital expenditures, seeking additional capital or seeking to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. There can be


52


no assurance, however, that we will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or thatlevels.
In January 2011, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Celanese Far East Limited, signed letters of intent to construct and operate industrial ethanol production facilities in Nanjing, China, at the Nanjing Chemical Industrial Park, and in Zhuhai, China, at the Gaolan Port Economic Zone. Pending project approvals, we will be ablecould begin industrial ethanol production within the next 30 months with expected nameplate capacity of 400,000 tons per year per plant with an initial investment of approximately $300 million per plant. We are pursuing approval at two locations to maintainensure our ability to borrow undereffectively grow with future demand.
In April 2010, we announced that, through our revolving credit facilities.strategic venture Ibn Sina, we will construct a 50,000 ton POM production facility in Saudi Arabia. Our pro rata share of invested capital in the POM expansion is expected to total approximately $165 million over a three year period which began in late 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred $2 million of capital expenditures. We anticipate related cash outflows for capital expenditures in 2011 will be $10 million.
Cash outflows for capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $350 million in 2011, excluding amounts related to the relocation of our Ticona plant in Kelsterbach and capacity expansion in Europe. Per the terms of our agreement with Fraport, we expect to receive the final cash installment of €110 million in 2011 subject to downward adjustments based on our readiness to close our operations at our Kelsterbach, Germany facility. As the relocation project progressed, we decided to expand the scope of the new production facilities and now expect to spend in excess of total proceeds to be received from Fraport. We anticipate related cash outflows for capital expenditures in 2011 will be €186 million.
In December 2009, we announced plans with China National Tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our Nantong facility. During 2010 we received formal approval to expand flake and tow capacities, each by 30,000 tons. Our Chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow. We made contributions during 2010 of $12 million and have committed to contributions of $17 million in 2011 related to the capacity expansion in Nantong.
 
As a result of the Pardies, France Projectplanned closure of Closure,our acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations at the Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom site, we recordedexpect to record total expenses of approximately $35 to $45 million, consisting of approximately $20 million for personnel-related exit costs of $89 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, which included $60 million in employee termination benefits, $17and approximately $20 million of other facility-related shutdown costs such as contract termination costs and $12 million of long-lived asset impairment losses to Other charges (gains), net. See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding Other Charges. In addition, we recorded $9 million of accelerated depreciation expense and $8 million of environmental remediation reserves for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to the shutdown of the Pardies, France facility. We may incur up to an additional $17 million in contingent employee termination benefits related to the Pardies, France Project of Closure.fixed assets. We expect that substantially all of the exit costs (except for accelerated depreciation of fixed assets)assets of approximately $15 million) will result in future cash expenditures over a two-year period. The Pardies, France facility is included inexpenditures. Cash outflows are expected to occur through 2011. For the Acetyl Intermediates segment. Referyear ended December 31, 2010, we recorded exit costs of $15 million related to personnel-related costs and $6 million related


60


to accelerated depreciation. See Note 4 and Note 17 to the Acetyl Intermediates sectionaccompanying consolidated financial statements for further information.
In addition to exit-related costs associated with the closure of the MD&A for more detail.Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations, we expect to incur capital expenditures of approximately $35 million in certain capacity and efficiency improvements, principally at our Lanaken, Belgium facility, to optimize our global production network.
 
On a stand-alone basis, Celanese Corporation has no material assets other than the stock of ourits subsidiaries and no independent external operations of ourits own. As such, weCelanese generally will depend on the cash flow of ourits subsidiaries and their ability to pay dividends and make other distributions to Celanese in order for Celanese to meet ourits obligations, including its obligations under our preferred stock, ourits Series A common stock, and our senior credit agreement.facilities and senior notes.
 
Cash Flows
 
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2010 were $740 million, which was a decrease of $514 million from December 31, 2009. Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2009 were $1,254 million, which was an increase of $578 million from December 31, 2008. Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2008 were $676 million, which was a decrease of $149 million from December 31, 2007. See below for details on the change in cash and cash equivalents from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009 and the change in cash and cash equivalents from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008.
 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $144 million to a cash inflow of $452 million in 2010 from a cash inflow of $596 million for the same period in 2009. The increase in trade working capital and the increases in cash paid for taxes and legal settlements, which negatively affected cash provided by operating activities, more than offset the increase in earnings and the increase in cash from our foreign currency hedges.
 
Cash flow provided by operating activities increased $10 million to a cash inflow of $596 million in 2009 from a cash inflow of $586 million for the same period in 2008. Operating cash flows were favorably impacted by less cash paid for interest, taxes, and legal settlements coupled with a favorable change in trade working capital which helped to offset lower operating performance.
 
Net Cash flow providedProvided by operating(Used in) Investing Activities
Net cash from investing activities increased $20 million to a cash inflow of $586 million in 2008decreased from a cash inflow of $566$31 million in 2009 to a cash outflow of $560 million for the same period in 2007. Operating cash flows were favorably impacted by positive trade working capital changes ($202 million), lower cash taxes paid ($83 million)2010. The decrease is primarily related to the receipt of proceeds of $412 million related to the Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation and the absencereceipt of adjustments to cash$168 million for discontinued operations. Adjustments to cash for discontinued operations of $84 million during 2007 related primarily to working capital changes of the oxo products and derivatives businesses and the shutdownsale of our Edmonton, Alberta, Canada methanol facility. OffsettingPVOH business that were both received in 2009. There were no such proceeds in 2010. Adding to the increasedecrease was cash outflows of $46 million incurred in 2010 related to our acquisition of two product lines, Zenite® LCP and Thermx® PCT, from DuPont Performance Polymers as compared to the cash flowsoutflows for our FACT business acquired in 2009 which were an increase in net cash interest paid ($78 million), cash spent on legal settlements ($134 million) and decreased operating profit during the period.
Net Cash Provided by/Used in Investing Activitiesonly $8 million.
 
Net cash from investing activities increased from a cash outflow of $201 million in 2008 to a cash inflow of $31 million in 2009. Net cash from investing activities increased primarily due to lower capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment, proceeds received from the sale of our PVOH business and increased deferred proceeds received on our Ticona Kelsterbach relocation. These cash inflows were offset slightly by in increase on our capital expenditures related to our Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation.
 
Net cash from investing activities decreased from a cash inflow of $143 million in 2007 to a cash outflow of $201 million in 2008. Net cash from investing activities decreased primarily due to cash spent in settlement of our cross currency swaps of $93 million (see Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements) and the absence of proceeds from the sale of our oxo products and derivatives businesses during 2007. These amounts were offset by net cash received on the sale of marketable securities ($111 million) and the excess of cash received from Fraport over amounts spent in connection with the Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation.


53


Our cash outflows for capital expenditures were $201 million, $176 million $274 million and $288$274 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively, excluding amounts related to the relocation of our Ticona plant in Kelsterbach. Capital expenditures were primarily related to major replacements of equipment, capacity expansions, major investments to reduce future operating costs and environmental and health and safety initiatives. Cash outflows for capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $265 million in 2010, excluding amounts related to the relocation offor our Ticona plant in Kelsterbach.
As ofKelsterbach were €236 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, we have received €542 million of cash from Fraport in connection with the Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation. Per the terms of the Fraport agreement, we expect to receive an additional €110 million in 2011 subject to downward adjustments based on our readiness to close our operations at our Kelsterbach, Germany facility. We anticipate related cash outflows for capital expenditures in 2010 will be €200 million.2010.


61


Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities increased from a cash outflow of $112 million in 2009 to a cash outflow of $388 million for the same period in 2010. The $276 million increase primarily relates to the net pay down on long-term debt of $297 million and $48 million used to repurchase shares of the Company’s Series A common stock.
 
Net cash for financing activities decreased from a cash outflow of $499 million in 2008 to a cash outflow of $112 million in 2009. The $387 million decrease in cash used in financing activities primarily related to cash outflows attributable to the repurchase of shares during 2008 of $378 million as compared to no shares repurchased during 2009.
 
Net cash for financing activities increased to a cash outflow of $499 million in 2008 compared to a cash outflow of $714 million during 2007. The increase primarily relates to the absence of cash outflows attributable to the debt refinancing in 2007. Also contributing to the increase, cash spent to repurchase shares was $25 million less during 2008 than during 2007. Decreased cash received for stock option exercises of $51 million partially offset the increase.
In addition, exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents increasedwas an unfavorable currency effect of $18 million in 2010 compared to a favorable currency effectimpact of $63 million in 2009 compared toand an unfavorable impact of $35 million in 2008 and a favorable impact of $39 million in 2007.2008.
 
Debt and Other Obligations
 
AsSenior Notes
On September 24, 2010, we completed an offering of December 31, 2009, we had total debt$600 million aggregate principal amount of $3,501 million and cash and cash equivalents of $1,254 million, resulting in net debt of $2,247 million, a $610 million decrease from December 31, 2008. Increased cash of $578 million and net cash paydowns on debt of $89 million were partially offset by new capital lease6 5/8% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “Notes”). The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of $38 millionCelanese US and unfavorable foreign currency impactsrank equally in right of $24 million.payment and other subordinated indebtedness of Celanese US. The Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by Celanese and each of the domestic subsidiaries of Celanese US that guarantee its obligations under its senior secured credit facilities (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”).
The Notes were issued under an indenture dated as of September 24, 2010 (the “Indenture”) among Celanese US, Celanese, the Subsidiary Guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 6 5/8% per annum and were priced at 100% of par. Celanese US will pay interest on the Notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year commencing on April 15, 2011. The Notes will mature on October 15, 2018. The Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after October 15, 2014 at the redemption prices specified in the Indenture. Prior to October 15, 2014, Celanese US may redeem some or all of the Notes at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus a “make-whole” premium as specified in the Indenture.
The Indenture contains covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to incur indebtedness; grant liens on assets; merge, consolidate, or sell assets; pay dividends or make other restricted payments; engage in transactions with affiliates; or engage in other businesses.
 
Senior Credit FacilitiesAgreement
 
OurOn September 29, 2010, we entered into an amendment agreement with the lenders under our existing senior secured credit facilities in order to amend and restate the corresponding credit agreement, dated as of April 2, 2007 (as previously amended, the “Existing Credit Agreement”, and as amended and restated by the amendment agreement, the “Amended Credit Agreement”). Our Amended Credit Agreement consists of $2,280the Term C loan facility having principal amounts of $1,140 million of US dollar-denominated and €400€204 million of Euro-denominated term loans due 2016, the Term B loan facility having principal amounts of $417 million US dollar-denominated and €69 million of Euro-denominated term loans due 2014, a $600 million revolving credit facility terminating in 20132015 and a $228 million credit-linked revolving facility terminating in 2014. AsPrior to entering into the Amendment Agreement, we used the proceeds from the offering of December 31, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings or letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility; accordingly, $600 million remained available for borrowing. As of December 31, 2009, there were $88Notes along with $200 million of letters of credit issued undercash on hand to pay down the credit-linked revolvingTerm B loan facility and $140 million remained available for borrowing. Our senior credit agreement requires us to not exceed a maximum first lien senior secured leverage ratio if there are outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The first lien senior secured leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of consolidated first lien senior secured debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, subject to adjustments identified in the credit agreement.Existing Credit Agreement. See Note 1413 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additionalfurther information regarding our senior credit facilities.


62


On June 30, 2009, we entered into an amendment toAs of December 31, 2010, the senior credit agreement. The amendment reduced the amountbalances available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility from $650 million to $600 million and increased the first lien senior secured leverage ratio covenant that is applicable when any amount is outstanding under thecredit-linked revolving credit portion of the senior credit agreement. Prior to giving effect to the amendment, the maximum first lien senior


54


secured leverage ratio was 3.90 to 1.00. As amended, the maximum senior secured leverage ratio for the following trailing four-quarter periods isfacility are as follows:
 
     
  First Lien Senior Secured
Leverage Ratio(In $ millions) 
 
December 31, 2009Revolving credit facility  5.25 to 1.00 
March 31, 2010Borrowings outstanding  4.75 to 1.00 
June 30, 2010Letters of credit issued  4.25 to 1.00 
September 30, 2010Available for borrowing  4.25 to 1.00600  
December 31, 2010 and thereafterCredit-linked revolving facility  3.90 to 1.00
Letters of credit issued83 
Available for borrowing145  
 
As a condition to borrowing funds or requesting that letters of credit be issued under the revolving credit facility, our first lien senior secured leverage ratio (as calculated as of the last day of the most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered under the revolving facility) cannot exceed a certainthe threshold as specified above.below. Further, our first lien senior secured leverage ratio must be maintained at or below that threshold while any amounts are outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The
Our amended maximum first lien senior secured leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of consolidated first lien senior secured debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, subject to adjustment identified in the credit agreement.
Based on theratios, estimated first lien senior secured leverage ratio forratios and the trailing four quarters at December 31, 2009, our borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility is $600 million. Asas of the quarter ended December 31, 2009, we estimate our first lien senior secured leverage ratio to be 3.39 to 1.00 (which would be 4.11 to 1.00 were the revolving credit facility fully drawn). The maximum first lien senior secured leverage ratio under the revolving credit facility for such quarter is 5.25 to 1.00. Our availability in future periods will be based on the first lien senior secured leverage ratio applicable to the future periods.2010 are as follows:
First Lien Senior Secured Leverage Ratios
Estimate, if Fully
Borrowing
MaximumEstimateDrawnCapacity
(In $ millions)
December 31, 2010 and thereafter3.9 to 1.00 1.8 to 1.00 2.4 to 1.00 600 
 
Our senior credit agreement alsoThe Amended Credit Agreement contains a number of restrictions on certain of our subsidiaries,covenants that are substantially similar to those found in the Existing Credit Agreement, including, but not limited to, restrictions on theirour ability to incur indebtedness; grant liens on assets; merge, consolidate, or sell assets; pay dividends or make other restricted payments; make investments; prepay or modify certain indebtedness; engage in transactions with affiliates; enter into sale-leaseback transactions or certain hedge transactions; or engage in other businesses. The senior credit agreement also containsbusinesses; as well as a number of affirmative covenants and events of default, including a cross default to other debt of certain of our subsidiaries in an aggregate amount equal to more than $40 million and the occurrencecovenant requiring maintenance of a change of control. Failure to complymaximum first lien senior secured leverage ratio.
We are in compliance with these covenants, or the occurrence of any other event of default, could result in accelerationall of the loans and other financial obligations undercovenants related to our senior credit agreement.debt agreements as of December 31, 2010.
 
Commitments Relating to Share Capital
 
Our Board of Directors adoptedWe have a policy of declaring, subject to legally available funds, a quarterly cash dividend on each share of our Series A common stock, at an annual rate of $0.16par value $0.0001 per share unlessshare. In April 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a 25% increase in its sole discretion determines otherwise.the Celanese quarterly Series A common stock cash dividend. The Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend rate from $0.04 to $0.05 per share of Series A common stock on a quarterly basis, which equates to $0.16 to $0.20 per share of Series A common stock annually. The new dividend rate was applicable to dividends payable beginning in August 2010. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, we paid $28 million, $23 million $24 million and $25$24 million, respectively, in cash dividends on our Series A common stock. On January 5, 2010,6, 2011, we declared a $6an $8 million cash dividend which was paid on February 1, 2010.2011.
 
Holders of our 4.25% convertible perpetual preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”) are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared byIn February 2008, our Board of Directors outauthorized the repurchase of funds legally available, quarterly cash dividends at the rate of 4.25% per annum, or $0.265625 per share of liquidation preference. Dividends on the Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of initial issuance. The Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time into 1.2600 sharesup to $400 million of our Series A common stock, subjectstock. This authorization was increased to adjustments, per $25.00 liquidation preference of$500 million in October 2008. The authorization gives management discretion in determining the Preferred Stock. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we paid $10 million annually of cash dividends on our Preferred Stock. On January 5, 2010, we declared a $3 million cash dividend on our Preferred Stock,conditions under which was paid on February 1, 2010.
On February 1, 2010, we announced we would elect to redeem all of our outstanding Preferred Stock on February 22, 2010. Holders of the Preferred Stock also have the right to convert their shares at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February 19, 2010, the business day immediately preceding the February 22,may be repurchased. This repurchase program does not


5563


2010 redemptionhave an expiration date. ConsideringThe number or shares repurchased and the redemptionaverage purchase price paid per share pursuant to this authorization are as follows:
                 
        Total From
  Year Ended December 31, Inception Through
  2010 2009 2008 December 31, 2010
 
Shares repurchased   1,667,592    -    9,763,200    11,430,792 
Average purchase price per share  $28.77   $ -   $38.68   $37.24 
Amount spent on repurchased shares (in millions)  $48   $ -   $378   $426 
The purchase of treasury stock will reduce the number of shares outstanding and the repurchased shares may be used by us for compensation programs utilizing our Preferred Stock, we will pay cash dividends on our Preferred Stockstock and other corporate purposes. We account for treasury stock using the cost method and include treasury stock as a component of $3 million in 2010.Shareholders’ equity.
 
Contractual Debt and Cash Obligations
 
The following table sets forth our fixed contractual debt and cash obligations as of December 31, 2009.2010.
 
                                        
 Payments due by period    Payments due by period 
   Less Than
     After 5
    Less Than
     After 5
 
 Total 1 Year Years 2 & 3 Years 4 & 5 Years  Total 1 Year Years 2 & 3 Years 4 & 5 Years 
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions) 
Fixed contractual debt obligations                                        
Term loans facility  2,785   29   57   2,699   - 
Senior notes   600     -    -    -    600  
Term B loans facility  508     5    10    493    -  
Term C loans facility  1,409     14    28    28    1,339  
Interest payments on debt and other obligations  921 (1)  193   286   165   277   1,199  (1)   208    309    244    438  
Capital lease obligations  242   34   28   28   152   245     15    32    31    167  
Other debt  474 (5)  179   69   45   181   456  (2)    194    21    28    213  
                      
Total  4,422   435   440   2,937   610   4,417     436    400    824    2,757  
Operating leases  203   50   67   40   46   336     62    92    83    99  
Uncertain tax obligations, including interest and penalties  234 (2)  5   -   -   229   288     15    -    -    273  (3) 
Unconditional purchase obligations  1,626 (3)  228   437   316   645   1,642  (4)    241    470    250    681  
Other commitments  713 (4)  187   274   141   111   308  (5)    80    100    39    89  
Pension and other postretirement funding obligations  1,347     205    413    391    338  
Environmental and asset retirement obligations  180   35   68   21   56   185     53    57    23    52  
                      
Total    7,378     940     1,286     3,455     1,697     8,523     1,092    1,532    1,610    4,289  
                      
 
(1)We have outstanding interest rate swap agreements accounted for as cash flow hedges that have the economic effect of modifying the variable rate obligations associated with our term loans into fixed interest obligations. The impact of these interest rate swaps was factored into the calculation of the future interest payments on long-term debt. Future interest expense is calculated using the rate in effect on January 2,December 31, 2010.
 
(2)Other debt of $456 million is primarily made up of fixed rate pollution control and industrial revenue bonds, short-term borrowings from affiliated companies and other bank obligations.


64


(3)Due to uncertainties in the timing of the effective settlement of tax positions with the respective taxing authorities, we are unable to determine the timing of payments related to our uncertain tax obligations, including interest and penalties. These amounts are therefore reflected in “After 5 Years”.
 
(3)(4)RepresentRepresents thetake-or-pay provisions included in certain long-term purchase agreements. We do not expect to incur material losses under these arrangements.
 
(4)(5)Includes other purchase obligations such as maintenance and service agreements, energy and utility agreements, consulting contracts, software agreements and other miscellaneous agreements and contracts, obtained via a survey of the Company.
(5)Other debt of $474 million is primarily made up of fixed rate pollution control and industrial revenue bonds, short-term borrowings from affiliated companies and other bank obligations.
 
Contractual Guarantees and Commitments
 
As of December 31, 2009,2010, we have current standby letters of credit of $88$83 million and bank guarantees of $12$10 million outstanding which are irrevocable obligations of an issuing bank that ensure payment to third parties in the event that certain subsidiaries fail to perform in accordance with specified contractual obligations. The likelihood is remote that material payments will be required under these agreements.
Other Obligations
Deferred Compensation. In April 2007, certain participants in our 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program, which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units. Underaddition, the revised cash program, participants relinquished their cash awards of up to $30 million that would have contingently accrued from


56


2007-2009 under the original plan. Based on current participation in the revised cash program, we expensed $10 million during the year ended December 31, 2009. The revised cash awards vest December 31, 2010.
In December 2008, we granted time-vesting cash awards of $22 million with Celanese’s executive officers and certain other key employees. Each award of cash vests 30% on October 14, 2009, 30% on October 14, 2010 and 40% on October 14, 2011. In its sole discretion, the compensation committee of the Board of Directors may at any time convert all or a portion of the cash award to an award of time-vesting restricted stock units. The liability cash awards are being accrued and expensed over the term of the agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2009, less than $1 million was paid to participants who left the Company and $6 million was paid in October 2009 to active employees representing 30% of the remaining outstanding award.
Pension and Other Postretirement Obligations. Our contributions for pension and postretirement benefits are preliminarily estimated to be $46 million and $27 million, respectively, in 2010.
Domination Agreement. The domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (the “Domination Agreement”) was approved at the Celanese GmbH, formerly known as Celanese AG, extraordinary shareholders’ meeting on July 31, 2004. The Domination Agreement between Celanese GmbH and the Purchaser became effective on October 1, 2004 and was terminated effective December 31, 2009senior notes issued by the Purchaser in the ordinary course of business. Our subsidiaries, Celanese International Holdings Luxembourg S.à r.l. (“CIH”), formerly Celanese Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A., and Celanese US, have each agreed to provide the Purchaser with financing to strengthen the Purchaser’s ability to fulfill its obligations under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement and to ensure that the Purchaser will perform all of its obligations under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement when such obligations become due, including, without limitation, the obligation to compensate Celanese GmbH for any statutory annual loss incurred by Celanese GmbH during the term of the Domination Agreement. If CIHand/or Celanese US are obligated to make payments under such guarantees or other securityguaranteed by Celanese and certain domestic subsidiaries of Celanese US. See Note 13 to the Purchaser, we may not have sufficient fundsaccompanying consolidated financial statements for payments ona description of this guarantee and the guarantees under our indebtedness when due. We have not had to compensate Celanese GmbH for an annual loss for any period during which the Domination Agreement has been in effect. Duesenior credit facility.
See Note 23 to the terminationaccompanying consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Domination Agreement there will be no obligationcommitments and contingencies related to compensate for any losses incurred after December 31, 2009.legal and regulatory proceedings.
 
Purchases of Treasury Stock
In February 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $400 million of our Series A common stock. This authorization was increased to $500 million in October 2008. The authorization gives management discretion in determining the conditions under which shares may be repurchased. This repurchase program does not have an expiration date. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not repurchase any shares of our Series A common stock in connection with this authorization. We have the ability to repurchase an additional $122 million of Series A common stock based on the Board of Director’s authorization of $500 million.
These purchases will reduce the number of shares outstanding and the repurchased shares may be used by us for compensation programs utilizing our stock and other corporate purposes. We account for treasury stock using the cost method and include treasury stock as a component of Shareholders’ equity.
Plumbing Actions
We are involved in a number of legal proceedings and claims incidental to the normal conduct of our business. As of December 31, 2009 there were reserves of $55 million related to plumbing action litigation. Although it is impossible at this time to determine with certainty the ultimate outcome of these matters, we believe, based on the advice of legal counsel, that adequate provisions have been made and that the ultimate outcome will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, but could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in any given accounting period.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have not entered into any material off-balance sheet arrangements.


57


Market Risks
 
Please seeItem 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Riskof thisForm 10-K for additional information about our Market Risks.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates 
 
Our consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)(“US GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and allocated charges during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. However, we are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would result in materially different results.
 
We believe the following accounting policespolicies and estimates are critical to understanding the financial reporting risks present in the current economic environment. These matters, and the judgments and uncertainties affecting them, are also essential to understanding our reported and future operating results. See Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a more comprehensivefurther discussion of our significant accounting policies.
 
• Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets
• Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets
 
Recoverability of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Assets
 
We test for impairment of goodwill at the reporting unit level. Our reporting units are either our operating business segments or one level below our operating business segments where discrete financial information is available for our reporting units and operating results are regularly reviewed by business segment management. Our business units have been designated as our reporting units based on business segment management’s review of and reliance


65


on the business unit financial information and include Advanced Engineered Materials, Acetate Products, Nutrinova, Emulsions, Celanese EVA Performance Polymers (formerly AT Plastics) and Acetyl Intermediates businesses. We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually during the third quarter of our fiscal year using June 30 balances or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets is measured using a discounted cash flow model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each reporting unit. Use of a discounted cash flow model is common practice in impairment testing in the absence of available transactional market evidence to determine the fair value.
 
The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, growth rates and cash flow projections are the most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. Discount rates are determined by using a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”). The WACC considers market and industry data as well as Company-specificcompany-specific risk factors for each reporting unit in determining the appropriate discount rate to be used. The discount rate utilized for each reporting unit is indicative of the return an investor would expect to receive for investing in such a business. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specificcompany-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and cash flow projections for each reporting unit. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual cash flow estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. If the calculated fair value is less than the current carrying value, impairment of the reporting unit may exist. If the recoverability test indicates potential impairment, we calculate an implied fair value of goodwill for the reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to how goodwill is calculated in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded to write down the carrying value. An impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit but may indicate certain


58


long-lived and amortizable intangible assets associated with the reporting unit may require additional impairment testing.
 
Management tests indefinite-lived intangible assets utilizing the relief from royalty method to determine the estimated fair value for each indefinite-lived intangible asset. The relief from royalty method estimates the Company’s theoretical royalty savings from ownership of the intangible asset. Key assumptions used in this model include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates and sales projections are the assumptions most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. Discount rates used are similar to the rates estimated by the WACC considering any differences in Company-specificcompany-specific risk factors. Royalty rates are established by management and are periodically substantiated by third-party valuation consultants. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specificcompany-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and sales projections associated with each indefinite-lived intangible asset. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual sales estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates.
 
For all significant goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the estimated fair value of the asset exceeded the carrying value of the asset by a substantial margin at the date of the most recent impairment test. Our methodology for determining impairment for both goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets was consistent with that used in the prior year.
 
Recoverability of Long-Lived and Amortizable Intangible Assets
 
We assess the recoverability of long-lived and amortizable intangible assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Examples of a change in events or circumstances include, but are not limited to, a decrease in the market price of the asset, a history of cash flow losses related to the use of the asset or a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is


66


being used. To assess the recoverability of long-lived and amortizable intangible assets we compare the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. Long-lived and amortizable intangible assets are tested for recognition and measurement of an impairment loss at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
 
The development of future net undiscounted cash flow projections require management projections related to sales and profitability trends and the remaining useful life of the asset. Projections of sales and profitability trends are the assumptions most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. These projections are consistent with projections we use to manage our operations internally. When impairment is indicated, a discounted cash flow valuation model similar to that used to value goodwill at the reporting unit level, incorporating discount rates commensurate with risks associated with each asset, is used to determine the fair value of the asset to measure potential impairment. We believe the assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating fair value.
 
Valuation methodologies utilized to evaluate goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible, amortizable intangible and long-lived assets for impairment were consistent with prior periods. We periodically engage third-party valuation consultants to assist us with this process. Specific assumptions discussed above are updated at the date of each test to consider current industry and Company-specificcompany-specific risk factors from the perspective of a market participant. The current business environment is subject to evolving market conditions and requires significant management judgment to interpret the potential impact to the Company’s assumptions. To the extent that changes in the current business environment result in adjusted management projections, impairment losses may occur in future periods.
 
• Income Taxes
• Income Taxes
 
We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance if needed based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, applicable tax planning strategies, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some


59


portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In forming our judgment regarding the recoverability of deferred tax assets related to deductible temporary differences and tax attribute carryforwards, we give weight to positive and negative evidence based on the extent to which the forms of evidence can be objectively verified. We attach the most weight to historical earnings due to its verifiable nature. Weight is attached to tax planning strategies if the strategies are prudent and feasible and implementable without significant obstacles. Less weight is attached to forecasted future earnings due to its subjective nature, and expected timing of reversal of taxable temporary differences is given little weight unless the reversal of taxable and deductible temporary differences coincide. Valuation allowances have been established primarily on net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets in the US, Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, Spain, China, the United Kingdom and Canada. We have appropriately reflected increases and decreases in our valuation allowance based on the overall weight of positive versus negative evidence on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis. In 2009, based on cumulative profitability, the Company concluded that the US valuation allowance should be reversed except for a portion related to certain federal and state net operating loss carryforwards that are not likely to be realized.
 
We record accruals for income taxes and associated interest that may become payable in future years as a result of audits by tax authorities. We recognize tax benefits when it is more likely than not (likelihood of greater than 50%), based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are measured using a probability weighted approach as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Whether the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is met for a tax position is a matter of judgment based on the individual facts and circumstances of that position evaluated in light of all available evidence.
 
The recoverability of deferred tax assets and the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions are subject to various assumptions and management judgment. If actual results differ from the estimates made by management in establishing or maintaining valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, the resulting change in the valuation


67


allowance would generally impact earnings or Other comprehensive income depending on the nature of the respective deferred tax asset. Additionally,In addition, the positions taken with regard to tax contingencies may be subject to audit and review by tax authorities which may result in future taxes, interest and penalties.
 
In December 2009, Mexico enacted the 2010 Mexican Tax Reform Bill (“Tax Reform Bill”) to be effective January 1, 2010. Under this new legislation, the corporate income tax rate will be temporarily increased from 28% to 30% for 2010 through 2012, then reduced to 29% in 2013, and finally reduced back to 28% in 2014 and future years. The Tax Reform Bill as enacted accelerates this recapture period from 10 years to 5 years and effectively requires payment of taxes even if no benefit was obtained through the tax consolidation regime. Finally, significant modifications were also made to the rules for income taxes previously deferred on intercompany dividends, as well as to income taxes related to differences between consolidated and individual Mexican tax earnings and profits. The estimated income tax impact to the Company of this new legislation at December 31, 2009 is $73 million, payable $12 million in 2010, $14 million in 2012, $12 million in 2013 and $35 million in 2014 and thereafter. There is an expectation that Mexico may publish technical corrections to certain aspects of the Tax Reform Bill in 2010 that could significantly reduce the amounts due from the Company as described above. However, there is no assurance that Mexico will in fact publish such corrections, nor is it clear what impact any corrections published will have on the Company’s actual liability under the new law. Although any ultimate outcome is uncertain, we strongly contend the new legislation is unconstitutional and we will contest its validity and effective date through proper channels.
• Benefit Obligations
 
We have pension and other postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements. With respect to its US qualified defined benefit pension plan, minimum funding requirements are determined by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 based on years of serviceand/or compensation. Various assumptions are used in the calculation of the actuarial valuation of the employee benefit plans. These assumptions include the weighted average discount rate, compensation levels, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and trends in health care costs. In addition to the above mentioned assumptions, actuarial consultants use factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate the projected benefit obligation. The actuarial assumptions used may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower


60


withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of pension expense recorded in future periods.
 
The amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements related to pension and other postretirement benefits are determined on an actuarial basis. A significant assumption used in determining our pension expense is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. As of December 31, 2009,2010, we assumed an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.5% for the US defined benefit pension plans, which represent approximately 83%82% and 85% of our fair value of pension plan assets and liabilities,projected benefit obligation, respectively. On average, the actual return on the US qualified defined pension plans’ assets over the long-term (15 to 20(20 years) has exceeded 8.5%.
 
We estimate a 25 basis point decline in the expected long-term rate of return for the US qualified defined benefit pension plan to increase pension expense by an estimated $5 million in 2009.2011. Another estimate that affects our pension and other postretirement benefit expense is the discount rate used in the annual actuarial valuations of pension and other postretirement benefit plan obligations. At the end of each year, we determine the appropriate discount rate, used to determine the present value of future cash flows currently expected to be required to settle the pension and other postretirement benefit obligations. The discount rate is generally based on the yield on high-quality corporate fixed-income securities. As of December 31, 2009,2010, we decreased the discount rate to 5.90%5.30% from 6.50%5.90% as of December 31, 20082009 for the US plans. We estimate that a 50 basis point decline in our discount rate will increase our annual pension expenses by an estimated $12$6 million, and increase our benefit obligations by approximately $151$146 million for our US pension plans. In addition, the same basis point decline in our discount rate will also increase our annual expenses and benefit obligations by less than $1 million and $9 million respectively, for our US postretirement medical plans. We estimate that a 50 basis point decline in the discount rate for the non-US pension and postretirement medical plans will increase pension and other postretirement benefit annual expenses by approximately $1 million and less than $1 million, respectively, and will increase our benefit obligations by approximately $32 million and $2 million, respectively.
 
Other postretirement benefit plans provide medical and life insurance benefits to retirees who meet minimum age and service requirements. The key determinants of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (“APBO”) are the discount rate and the healthcare cost trend rate. The healthcare cost trend rate has a significant effect on the reported amounts of APBO and related expense. For example, increasing or decreasing the healthcare cost trend rate by one percentage point in each year would result in the APBO as of December 31, 2009 changing2010 increasing by approximately $4 million and $(3)decreasing by $4 million, respectively. Additionally, increasing or decreasing the healthcare cost trend rate by one percentage point in each year would result in the 20092010 postretirement benefit cost changing by less than $1 million.
 
Pension assumptions are reviewed annually on a plan and country-specific basis by third-party actuaries and senior management. Such assumptions are adjusted as appropriate to reflect changes in market rates and outlook. We determine the long-term expected rate of return on plan assets by considering the current target asset allocation, as well as the historical and expected rates of return on various asset categories in which the plans are invested. A single long-term expected rate of return on plan assets is then calculated for each plan as the weighted average of the


68


target asset allocation and the long-term expected rate of return assumptions for each asset category within each plan.
 
Differences between actual rates of return of plan assets and the long-term expected rate of return on plan assets are generally not recognized in pension expense in the year that the difference occurs. These differences are deferred and amortized into pension expense over the average remaining future service of employees. We apply the long-term expected rate of return on plan assets to a market-related value of plan assets to stabilize variability in the plan asset values.
 
• Accounting for Commitments and Contingencies
• Accounting for Commitments and Contingencies
 
We are subject to a number of legal proceedings, lawsuits, claims, and investigations, incidental to the normal conduct of our business, relating to and including product liability, patent and intellectual property, commercial, contract, antitrust, past waste disposal practices, release of chemicals into the environment and employment matters, which are handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. We routinely assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as ranges of probable and reasonably estimable losses. Reasonable estimates involve judgments made by us after considering a broad range of information including:


61


notifications, demands, settlements which have been received from a regulatory authority or private party, estimates performed by independent consultants and outside counsel, available facts, identification of other potentially responsible parties and their ability to contribute, as well as prior experience. With respect to environmental remediation liabilities, it is our policy to accrue through fifteen years, unless we have government orders or other agreements that extend beyond fifteen years. A determination of the amount of loss contingency required, if any, is assessed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 450,Contingencies,and recorded if probable and estimable after careful analysis of each individual matter. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter and as additional information becomes available.
 
Financial Reporting Changes
 
See Note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information regarding recent accounting pronouncements.
 
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
Market Risks
 
Our financial market risk consists principally of exposure to currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Exchange rate and interest rate risks are managed with a variety of techniques, including use of derivatives. We have in place policies of hedging against changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices as described below. Contracts to hedge exposures are primarily accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 815,Derivatives and Hedging(“FASB ASC Topic 815”).
 
See Note 21 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our market risk management and the related impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Interest Rate Risk Management
 
We use interest rate swap agreements to manage the interest rate risk of our total debt portfolio and related overall cost of borrowing. To reduce the interest rate risk inherent in our variable rate debt, we utilize interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of our variable rate debt to a fixed rate obligation. These interest rate swap agreements are designated as cash flow hedges.
 
In March 2007, in anticipation of the April 2007 debt refinancing,August 2010, we entered into various US dollar and Euro interest rate swap agreements, which became effective on April 2, 2007, with notional amounts of $1.6 billion and €150 million, respectively. The notional amount of the $1.6 billion US dollar interest rate swaps decreased by $400 million effective January 2, 2008 and decreased by another $200 million effective January 2, 2009. To offset the declines, we entered into US dollar interest rate swaps withexecuted a combined notional amount of $400 million which became effective on January 2, 2008 and an additional US dollarforward-starting interest rate swap with a notional amount of $200 million which became$1.1 billion. As a result of the swap, we have fixed the LIBOR portion of $1.1 billion of the Company’s floating rate debt at 1.7125% effective AprilJanuary 2, 2009.2012 through January 2, 2014.


69


Our US-dollar interest rate swap derivative arrangements are as follows:
        
As of December 31, 2010
Notional Value Effective Date Expiration Date Fixed Rate(1)
(In $ millions)      
 
 100 April 2, 2007 January 2, 2011 4.92%
 800 April 2, 2007 January 2, 2012 4.92%
 400 January 2, 2008 January 2, 2012 4.33%
 200 April 2, 2009 January 2, 2012 1.92%
 1,100  January 2, 2012 January 2, 2014 1.71%
       
 2,600       
       
(1)Fixes the LIBOR portion of the Company’s US-dollar denominated variable rate borrowings (Note 13).
        
As of December 31, 2009
Notional Value Effective Date Expiration Date Fixed Rate(1)
(In $ millions)      
 
 100 April 2, 2007 January 4, 2010 4.92%
 100 April 2, 2007 January 2, 2011 4.92%
 800 April 2, 2007 January 2, 2012 4.92%
 400 January 2, 2008 January 2, 2012 4.33%
 200 April 2, 2009 January 2, 2012 1.92%
       
 1,600       
       
(1)Fixes the LIBOR portion of the Company’s US-dollar denominated variable rate borrowings (Note 13).
Our Euro interest rate swap derivative arrangements are as follows:
        
As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Notional Value Effective Date Expiration Date Fixed Rate(1)
(In € millions)      
 
 150  April 2, 2007 April 2, 2011 4.04%
(1)Fixes the EURIBOR portion of the Company’s Euro denominated variable rate borrowings (Note 13).
 
As of December 31, 2009,2010, we had $2.2$1.6 billion, €440€296 million and CNY 1.41.5 billion of variable rate debt, of which $1.6$1.5 billion and €150 million is hedged with interest rate swaps, which leaves $643$73 million, €290€146 million and CNY 1.41.5 billion of variable rate debt subject to interest rate exposure. Accordingly, a 1% increase in interest rates would increase annual interest expense by approximately $13$5 million.
See Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our interest rate risk management and the related impact on our financial position and results of operations.
 
Foreign Exchange Risk Management
 
The primary business objective of this hedging program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes, net of related tax effects, are minimized. It is our policy to minimize currency exposures and to conduct operations either within functional currencies or using the protection of hedge strategies. Accordingly, we enter into foreign currency forwards and swaps to minimize our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. From time to time we may also hedge our currency exposure related to forecasted transactions. Forward contracts are not designated as hedges under FASB ASC Topic 815.


70


The following table indicates the total US dollar equivalents of net foreign exchange exposure related to (short) long foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding by currency. All of the contracts included in the table below will


62


have approximately offsetting effects from actual underlying payables, receivables, intercompany loans or other assets or liabilities subject to foreign exchange remeasurement.
 
     
Currency
 20102011 Maturity
  (In $ millions)
 
Currency
 
Euro  (372217)
British pound sterling  (9043)
Chinese renminbi         (200(265)
Mexican peso  (522)
Singapore dollar  2726 
Canadian dollar  (4835)
Japanese yen  81 
Brazilian real  (1112)
Swedish krona  1514 
Other  (16)
     
Total  (677433)
     
 
Additionally, a portion of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the US dollar, principally the Euro.dollar. Fluctuations in the value of these currencies against the US dollar particularly the value of the Euro, can have a direct and material impact on the business and financial results. For example, a decline in the value of the Euro versus the US dollar results in a decline in the US dollar value of our sales and earnings denominated in Euros due to translation effects. Likewise, an increase in the value of the Euro versus the US dollar would result in an opposite effect.
 
To protect the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation,In 2009, we entered into cross currency swaps with certain financial institutions in 2004. The cross currency swaps and the Euro-denominated portion of the senior term loan were designated as a hedge of a net investment of a foreign operation. We dedesignated the net investment hedge due to the debt refinancing in April 2007 and redesignated the cross currency swaps and new senior Euro term loan in July 2007. As a result, we recorded $26 million ofmark-to-market losses related to the cross currency swaps and the new senior Euro term loan during this period.
Under the terms of the cross currency swap arrangements, we paid approximately €13 million in interest and received approximately $16 million in interest on June 15 and December 15 of each year. The fair value of the net obligation under the cross currency swaps was included in current Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007. Upon maturity of the cross currency swap arrangements in June 2008, we owed €276 million ($426 million) and were owed $333 million. In settlement of the obligation, we paid $93 million (net of interest of $3 million) in June 2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we dedesignated €385 million of the €400 million euro-denominated portion of the term loan, previously designated as a hedge of a net investment of a foreign operation. The remaining €15 million Euro-denominated portion of the term loan was dedesignated as a hedge of a net investment of a foreign operation in June 2009. Prior to these dedesignations, we had been using external derivative contracts to offset foreign currency exposures on certain intercompany loans. As a result of the dedesignations, the foreign currency exposure created by the Euro-denominated term loan which is expected to offset the foreign currency exposure on certain intercompany loans, decreasing the need for external derivative contracts and reducing our exposure to external counterparties.
 
See Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our foreign exchange risk management and the related impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Commodity Risk Management
 
We have exposure to the prices of commodities in our procurement of certain raw materials. We manage our exposure to commodity risk primarily through the use of long-term supply agreements, multi-year purchasing and derivative instruments.sales agreements and forward purchase agreements. We regularly assess


63


our practice of purchasing a portion of our commodity requirements under forward purchase agreements and utilization of other raw material hedging instruments in addition to forward purchase contracts, in accordance with changes in market conditions. Forward purchases and swap contracts for raw materials are principally settled through actual delivery of the physical commodity. For qualifying contracts, we have elected to apply the normal purchases and normal sales exception of FASB ASC Topic 815 as it was probablebased on the probability at the inception and throughout the term of the contract that theywe would not settle net and the transaction would result insettle by physical delivery.delivery of the commodity. As such, realized gains and losses on these contracts are included in the cost of the commodity upon the settlement of the contract.
 
In addition, we occasionally enter into financial derivatives to hedge a component of a raw material or energy source. Typically, these types of transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments are marked to market at each reporting period and gains (losses) are included in Cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We recognized no gain or loss from these types of contracts during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and less than $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.2008. As of December 31, 2009,2010, we did not have any open financial derivative contracts for commodities.


71


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
Our consolidated financial statements and supplementary data are included inItem 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedulesof this Annual Report onForm 10-K.


64


Quarterly Financial Information
 
CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
                
                 Three Months Ended 
 Three Months Ended  March 31,
 June 30,
 September 30,
 December 31,
 
 March 31,
 June 30,
 September 30,
 December 31,
  2010 2010 2010 2010 
 2009 2009 2009 2009  As Adjusted       
 (Unaudited)
  (Unaudited) 
 (In $ millions, except per share data)  (In $ millions, except per share data) 
Net sales  1,146   1,244   1,304   1,388        1,388        1,517        1,506        1,507 
Gross profit  200   248   266   289   218   303   346   313 
Other (charges) gains, net  (21) (1)  (6)  (96) (2)  (13)  (77(1)  (6)  36 (2)  1 
Operating profit (loss)  27   89   65   109   (14)  156   221   140 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  (16)  122   49   86   (7)  224   191   130 
Amounts attributable to Celanese Corporation                                
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  (21)  105   399   1   13   163   147   103 
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  1   (1)  -   4   1   (3)  (2)  (45)
         
Net earnings (loss)  (20)  104   399   5   14   160   145   58 
         
Earnings (loss) per share — basic  (0.16)  0.71   2.76   0.02   0.07   1.02   0.93   0.37 
Earnings (loss) per share — diluted  (0.16)  0.66   2.53   0.02   0.07   1.01   0.92   0.36 
 
                
                 Three Months Ended 
 Three Months Ended  March 31,
 June 30,
 September 30,
 December 31,
 
 March 31,
 June 30,
 September 30,
 December 31,
  2009 2009 2009 2009 
 2008 2008 2008 2008  As Adjusted 
 (Unaudited)
  (Unaudited)
 
 (In $ millions, except per share data)  (In $ millions, except per share data) 
Net sales  1,846   1,868   1,823   1,286        1,146        1,244        1,304        1,388 
Gross profit  418   396   333   109   200   248   266   289 
Other (charges) gains, net  (16)  (7)  (1) (3)  (84) (4)  (21(3)  (6)  (96(4)  (13)
Operating profit (loss)  234   207   151   (152)  27   89   65   109 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  218   247   152   (183)  (11)  127   48   87 
Amounts attributable to Celanese Corporation                                
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  145   203   164   (140)  (16)  110   398   2 
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  -   (69)  (6)  (15)  1   (1)  -   4 
         
Net earnings (loss)  145   134   158   (155)  (15)  109   398   6 
         
Earnings (loss) per share — basic  0.93   0.87   1.05   (1.09)  (0.12)  0.74   2.75   0.03 
Earnings (loss) per share — diluted  0.87   0.80   0.97   (1.09)  (0.12)  0.69   2.53   0.03 


72


 
(1)Consists principally of $72 million in long-lived asset impairment losses. The long-lived asset impairment losses are associated with the proposed closure of the Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom acetate production facility.
(2)Consists principally of $18 million in net insurance recoveries, a $26 million reduction in plumbing legal reserves, and a $15 million favorable settlement in a resolution of a commercial dispute, partially offset by $16 million of employee termination costs related to the closures of the Pardies, France and Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom plant locations.
(3)Consists principally of $24 million in employee termination benefits due to our efforts to align production capacity and staffing levels with our current view of an economic environment of prolonged lower demand.
 
(2)(4)Consists principally of $65$58 million in employee termination benefits, $20 million of contract termination costs and $7 million of long-lived impairment losses related to the Project of Closure at our Pardies, France plant location.
(3)Consists principally of $21 million in long-lived asset impairment losses, $23 million in insurance recoveries and $8 million in employee termination benefits. The long-lived asset impairment losses are associated with the sale of our Pampa, Texas plant. The insurance recoveries were received from our reinsurers in partial satisfaction of loss claims resulting from the previously announced outage at our Clear Lake, Texas acetic acid facility.
(4)Consists principally of $94 million in long-lived impairment losses and $15 million in insurance recoveries. The long-lived asset impairment losses are associated with the 2009 closure of our acetic acid and VAM production


65


facility in Pardies, France, the 2009 VAM production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico and certain other facilities. The insurance recoveries reflect amounts received from our reinsurers in partial satisfaction of loss claims resulting from the previously announced outage at our Clear Lake, Texas acetic acid facility.
 
For a discussion of material events affecting performance in each quarter, seeItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. All amounts in the table above have been properly adjusted for the effects of discontinued operations.operations and the Ibn Sina accounting change described below.
Ibn Sina
We indirectly own a 25% interest in Ibn Sina through CTE Petrochemicals Company (“CTE”), a venture with Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd. (which also indirectly owns 25%). The remaining interest in Ibn Sina is held by Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (“SABIC”). SABIC and CTE entered into the Ibn Sina joint venture agreement in 1981. In April 2010, we announced that Ibn Sina will construct a 50,000 ton POM production facility in Saudi Arabia and that the term of the joint venture agreement was extended until 2032. Ibn Sina’s existing natural gas supply contract expires in 2022. Upon successful startup of the POM facility, our indirect economic interest in Ibn Sina will increase from 25% to 32.5%. SABIC’s economic interest will remain unchanged.
In connection with this transaction, we reassessed the factors surrounding the accounting method for this investment and changed from the cost method of accounting for investments to the equity method of accounting for investments beginning April 1, 2010. Financial information relating to this investment for periods prior to 2010 has been retrospectively adjusted to apply the equity method of accounting.
 
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
None.
 
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange ActRule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report.Annual Report. Based on that evaluation, as of December 31, 2009,2010, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that theseour disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
 
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 
 
None.During the three months ended December 31, 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


73


REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our consolidated financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of company assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of company assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our consolidated financial statements would be prevented or detected.
 
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.2010. KPMG LLP has audited this assessment of our internal control over financial reporting; theirits report is included below.


6674


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Celanese Corporation:
 
We have audited Celanese Corporation and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying report of management on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, Celanese Corporation and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Celanese Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009,2010, and our report dated February 12, 201011, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
 
/s/KPMG LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
February 12, 201011, 2011


6775


Item 9B.Other Information
 
None.
 
PART III
 
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference from the sections captioned “Item 1: Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance,” “Our Management Team,”Governance” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 20102011 annual meeting of stockholdersshareholders to be filed not later than March 12, 201011, 2011 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “2010“2011 Proxy Statement”). Information about executive officers of the Company is contained in Part I of this Annual Report and it incorporated by reference.
 
Item��Item 11.Executive Compensation
 
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the sections captioned “Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Tables,” “Potential Payments upon Termination and Change in Control,” and “Corporate Governance – Compensation“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Compensation Committee Report” of the 20102011 Proxy Statement.
 
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference from the section captioned “Stock Ownership Information” of the 20102011 Proxy Statement. The information required by Item 201(d) ofRegulation S-K is submitted in a separate section of thisForm 10-K. SeeItem 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities, above.
 
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the section captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance — Director Independence” of the 20102011 Proxy Statement.
 
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the sectionssection captioned “Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Corporate Governance and Director Independence” of the 20102011 Proxy Statement.


76


 
PART IV
 
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
 
1.  Financial Statements.The reportsreport of our independent registered public accounting firm and our consolidated financial statements are listed below and begin on page 7381 of this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
     
  Page Number
 
  7381
  7482
  7583
  7684
  7886
  7987


68


2. Financial Statement Schedule.
 
The financial statement schedule required by this item is included as an Exhibit to this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
 
3. Exhibit List.
 
See Index to Exhibits following our consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.
PLEASE NOTE: It is inappropriate for readers to assume the accuracy of, or rely upon any covenants, representations or warranties that may be contained in agreements or other documents filed as Exhibits to, or incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report. Any such covenants, representations or warranties may have been qualified or superseded by disclosures contained in separate schedules or exhibits not filed with or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report, may reflect the parties’ negotiated risk allocation in the particular transaction, may be qualified by materiality standards that differ from those applicable for securities law purposes, and may not be true as of the date of this Annual Report or any other date and may be subject to waivers by any or all of the parties. Where exhibits and schedules to agreements filed or incorporated by reference as Exhibits hereto are not included in these exhibits, such exhibits and schedules to agreements are not included or incorporated by reference herein.


6977


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused the report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
CELANESE CORPORATION
 
 By: /s/  David N. Weidman
Name:     David N. Weidman
Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
 
Date: February 12, 201011, 2011
 
POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steven M. Sterin, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact with power of substitution and resubstitution to sign in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to do any and all things and execute any and all instruments that such attorney may deem necessary or advisable under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any rules, regulations and requirements of the US Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K and any and all amendments hereto, as fully for all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms said attorney-in-fact, acting alone, and his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
       
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
     
/s/  David N. Weidman

David N. Weidman
 Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 February 12, 201011, 2011
     
/s/  Steven M. Sterin

Steven M. Sterin
 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
 February 12, 201011, 2011
     
/s/  Christopher W. Jensen

Christopher W. Jensen
 Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller (PrincipalTreasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 February 12, 201011, 2011
     
/s/  James E. Barlett

James E. Barlett
 Director February 12, 201011, 2011
     
/s/  David F. Hoffmeister

David F. Hoffmeister
 Director February 12, 201011, 2011
     
/s/  Martin G. McGuinn

Martin G. McGuinn
 Director February 12, 2010
/s/  Paul H. O’Neill     

Paul H. O’Neill
DirectorFebruary 12, 201011, 2011


7078


       
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
     
/s/  Mark C. Rohr          Paul H. O’Neill

Mark C. RohrPaul H. O’Neill  
 Director February 12, 201011, 2011
/s/  Mark C. Rohr

Mark C. Rohr  
DirectorFebruary 11, 2011
     
/s/  Daniel S. Sanders

Daniel S. Sanders
 Director February 12, 201011, 2011
     
/s/  Farah M. Walters

Farah M. Walters
 Director February 12, 201011, 2011
     
/s/  John K. Wulff

John K. Wulff
 Director February 12, 201011, 2011


7179


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
   
  
Page Number
 
ANNUAL CELANESE CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 7381
2008 7482
2009 7583
2008 7684
2008 7886
Statements 87
 7987
 7987
 8593
 8694
 8999
 90100
 90100
 91101
 92102
and Intangible Assets, Net 93103
Current Other Liabilities 94105
 95105
95
97
99
 107
14. Benefit Obligations 111
10915. Environmental 120
123
17. Other (Charges) Gains, Net 111125
 113127
 116132
 120137
 121137
 123141
 126144
 132150
25. Segment Information 132151
 135153
 136155
 136155
 156
13730. Consolidating Guarantor Financial Information 156
 137165


7280


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Celanese Corporation:
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Celanese Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009.2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Celanese Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009,2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 12, 201011, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
As discussed in Note 1514 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position No. 132(R)-1,Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets(included in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic715-20,Defined Benefit Plans), during the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
As discussed in Note 2322 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(included in FASB ASC Subtopic820-10,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures), during the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
As discussed in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes(included in FASB ASC Subtopic740-10,Income Taxes), during the year ended December 31, 2007.
/s/KPMG LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
February 12, 201011, 2011


7381


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008
 (In $ millions, except for share and per share data)    As Adjusted (Note 4)
 (In $ millions, except for share and per share data)
Net sales  5,082   6,823   6,444    5,918    5,082    6,823 
Cost of sales  (4,079)   (5,567)   (4,999)    (4,738   (4,079   (5,567
             
Gross profit  1,003   1,256   1,445    1,180    1,003    1,256 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (469)   (540)   (516)    (505   (474   (545
Amortization of intangible assets (primarily customer relationships)  (77)   (76)   (72) 
Amortization of intangible assets   (61   (77   (76
Research and development expenses  (75)   (80)   (73)    (70   (70   (75
Other (charges) gains, net  (136)   (108)   (58)    (46   (136   (108
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net  2   (4)   2    (3   2    (4
Gain (loss) on disposition of businesses and assets, net  42   (8)   20    8    42    (8
             
Operating profit  290   440   748    503    290    440 
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  48   54   82    168    99    172 
Interest expense  (207)   (261)   (262)    (204   (207   (261
Refinancing expense  -   -   (256)    (16   -    - 
Interest income  8   31   44    7    8    31 
Dividend income — cost investments  98   167   116    73    57    48 
Other income (expense), net  4   3   (25)    7    4    3 
             
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  241   434   447    538    251    433 
Income tax (provision) benefit  243   (63)   (110)    (112   243    (63
             
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  484   371   337    426    494    370 
             
Earnings (loss) from operation of discontinued operations  6   (120)   40    (80   6    (120
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations  -   6   52 
Gain (loss) on disposition of discontinued operations   2    -    6 
Income tax (provision) benefit from discontinued operations  (2)   24   (2)    29    (2   24 
             
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  4   (90)   90    (49   4    (90
             
Net earnings (loss)  488   281   427    377    498    280 
Net (earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  -   1   (1)    -    -    1 
             
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation  488   282   426    377    498    281 
Cumulative preferred stock dividends  (10)   (10)   (10)    (3   (10   (10
             
Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders  478   272   416    374    488    271 
             
Amounts attributable to Celanese Corporation                        
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  484   372   336    426    494    371 
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  4   (90)   90    (49   4    (90
             
Net earnings (loss)  488   282   426    377    498    281 
             
Earnings (loss) per common share – basic            
Earnings (loss) per common share — basic            
Continuing operations  3.30   2.44   2.11    2.73    3.37    2.44 
Discontinued operations  0.03   (0.61)   0.58    (0.31   0.03    (0.61
             
Net earnings (loss) – basic  3.33   1.83   2.69 
Net earnings (loss) — basic   2.42    3.40    1.83 
             
Earnings (loss) per common share – diluted            
Earnings (loss) per common share — diluted            
Continuing operations  3.08   2.28   1.96    2.69    3.14    2.27 
Discontinued operations  0.03   (0.55)   0.53    (0.31   0.03    (0.55
             
Net earnings (loss) – diluted  3.11   1.73   2.49 
Net earnings (loss) — diluted   2.38    3.17    1.72 
             
Weighted average shares – basic  143,688,749   148,350,273   154,475,020 
Weighted average shares – diluted  157,115,521   163,471,873   171,227,997 
Weighted average shares — basic   154,564,136    143,688,749    148,350,273 
Weighted average shares — diluted   158,372,192    157,115,521    163,471,873 
 
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


7482


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
           
  As of December 31, 
  2009  2008 
  (In $ millions, except
 
  share amounts) 
 
ASSETS
Current assets          
Cash and cash equivalents  1,254    676  
Trade receivables – third party and affiliates (net of allowance for doubtful accounts – 2009: $18; 2008: $25)  721    631  
Non-trade receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts – 2009: $0; 2008: $1)  255    274  
Inventories  522    577  
Deferred income taxes  42    24  
Marketable securities, at fair value  3    6  
Assets held for sale  2    2  
Other assets  57    96  
           
Total current assets  2,856    2,286  
           
Investments in affiliates  790    789  
Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation – 2009: $1,130; 2008: $1,051)  2,797    2,470  
Deferred income taxes  484    27  
Marketable securities, at fair value  80    94  
Other assets  311    357  
Goodwill  798    779  
Intangible assets, net  294    364  
           
Total assets  8,410    7,166  
           
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities          
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt – third party and affiliates  242    233  
Trade payables – third party and affiliates  649    523  
Other liabilities  611    574  
Deferred income taxes  33    15  
Income taxes payable  72    24  
           
Total current liabilities  1,607    1,369  
           
Long-term debt  3,259    3,300  
Deferred income taxes  137    122  
Uncertain tax positions  229    218  
Benefit obligations  1,288    1,167  
Other liabilities  1,306    806  
Commitments and contingencies          
Shareholders’ equity          
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized (2009 and 2008: 9,600,000 shares issued and outstanding)  -    -  
Series A common stock, $0.0001 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized (2009: 164,995,755 shares issued and 144,394,069 outstanding; 2008: 164,107,394 shares issued and 143,505,708 outstanding)  -    -  
Series B common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized (2009 and 2008: 0 shares issued and outstanding)  -    -  
Treasury stock, at cost – (2009 and 2008: 20,601,686 shares)  (781)   (781) 
Additional paid-in capital  522    495  
Retained earnings  1,502    1,047  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net  (659)   (579) 
           
Total Celanese Corporation shareholders’ equity  584    182  
Noncontrolling interests  -    2  
        ��  
Total shareholders’ equity  584    184  
           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity  8,410    7,166  
           
         
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
    As Adjusted
    (Note 4)
  (In $ millions, except share amounts)
ASSETS
Current assets        
Cash and cash equivalents   740    1,254 
Trade receivables — third party and affiliates (net of allowance for doubtful accounts — 2010: $12; 2009: $18)   827    721 
Non-trade receivables, net   253    262 
Inventories   610    522 
Deferred income taxes   92    42 
Marketable securities, at fair value   78    3 
Assets held for sale   9    2 
Other assets   59    50 
         
Total current assets   2,668    2,856 
         
Investments in affiliates   838    792 
Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation — 2010: $1,131; 2009: $1,130)   3,017    2,797 
Deferred income taxes   443    484 
Marketable securities, at fair value   -    80 
Other assets   289    311 
Goodwill   774    798 
Intangible assets, net   252    294 
         
Total assets   8,281    8,412 
         
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities        
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt — third party and affiliates   228    242 
Trade payables — third party and affiliates   673    649 
Other liabilities   596    611 
Deferred income taxes   28    33 
Income taxes payable   17    72 
         
Total current liabilities   1,542    1,607 
         
Long-term debt   2,990    3,259 
Deferred income taxes   116    137 
Uncertain tax positions   273    229 
Benefit obligations   1,359    1,288 
Other liabilities   1,075    1,306 
Commitments and contingencies        
Shareholders’ equity        
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized (2010: 0 issued and outstanding; 2009: 9,600,000 issued and outstanding)   -    - 
Series A common stock, $0.0001 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized (2010: 178,028,571 issued and 155,759,293 outstanding; 2009: 164,995,755 issued and 144,394,069 outstanding)   -    - 
Series B common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized (2010 and 2009: 0 issued and outstanding)   -    - 
Treasury stock, at cost (2010: 22,269,278 shares; 2009: 20,601,686 shares)   (829   (781
Additional paid-in capital   574    522 
Retained earnings   1,851    1,505 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net   (670   (660
         
Total Celanese Corporation shareholders’ equity   926    586 
Noncontrolling interests   -    - 
         
Total shareholders’ equity   926    586 
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   8,281    8,412 
         
 
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


7583


 
                         
  2009  2008  2007 
  Shares
     Shares
     Shares
    
  Outstanding  Amount  Outstanding  Amount  Outstanding  Amount 
  (In $ millions, except share data) 
 
Preferred stock                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period  9,600,000        -   9,600,000        -   9,600,000        - 
Issuance of preferred stock  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period  9,600,000   -   9,600,000   -   9,600,000   - 
                         
Series A common stock                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period  143,505,708   -   152,102,801   -   158,668,666   - 
Issuance of Series A common stock  -   -   -   -   7,400   - 
Stock option exercises  806,580   -   1,056,368   -   4,265,221   - 
Purchases of treasury stock  -   -   (9,763,200)  -   (10,838,486)  - 
Stock awards  81,781   -   109,739   -   -   - 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period  144,394,069   -   143,505,708   -   152,102,801   - 
                         
Treasury stock                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period  20,601,686   (781)  10,838,486   (403)  -   - 
Purchases of treasury stock, including related fees  -   -   9,763,200   (378)  10,838,486   (403)
                         
Balance as of the end of the period  20,601,686   (781)  20,601,686   (781)  10,838,486   (403)
                         
Additional paid-in capital                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period      495       469       362 
Indemnification of demerger liability      -       2       4 
Stock-based compensation, net of tax      13       15       15 
Stock option exercises, net of tax      14       9       88 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period      522       495       469 
                         
Retained earnings                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period      1,047       799       394 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation      488       282       426 
Series A common stock dividends      (23)      (24)      (25)
Preferred stock dividends      (10)      (10)      (10)
Adoption of ASC 740(1)
      -       -       14 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period      1,502       1,047       799 
                         
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period      (579)      197       31 
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities      (3)      (23)      17 
Foreign currency translation      5       (130)      70 
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps      15       (79)      (41)
Pension and postretirement benefits      (97)      (544)      120 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period      (659)             (579)      197 
                         
Total Celanese Corporation shareholders’ equity      584       182       1,062 
                         
Noncontrolling interests                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period      2       5       74 
Purchase of remaining noncontrolling interests      -       -       (70)
Divestiture of noncontrolling interests      (2)      (2)      - 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests      -       (1)      1 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period      -       2       5 
                         
Total shareholders’ equity             584       184              1,067 
                         
 
(1)Adoption of ASC 740,Income Taxesrelated to uncertain tax positions (Note 19).


76


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
                         
  2009  2008  2007 
  Shares
     Shares
     Shares
    
  Outstanding  Amount  Outstanding  Amount  Outstanding  Amount 
  (In $ millions, except share data) 
 
Comprehensive income (loss)                        
Net earnings (loss)                488                 281                 427 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:                        
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities      (3)      (23)      17 
Foreign currency translation      5       (130)      70 
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps      15       (79)      (41)
Pension and postretirement benefits      (97)      (544)      120 
                         
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax      408       (495)      593 
                         
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests      -       1       (1)
                         
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation      408       (494)      592 
                         
                         
  2010 2009 2008
  Shares
   Shares
   Shares
  
  Outstanding Amount Outstanding Amount Outstanding Amount
           As Adjusted (Note 4)
  (In $ millions, except share data)
Preferred stock                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period   9,600,000    -    9,600,000    -    9,600,000    - 
Redemption of preferred stock   (9,600,000   -    -    -    -    - 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period   -    -    9,600,000    -    9,600,000    - 
                         
Series A common stock                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period   144,394,069    -    143,505,708    -    152,102,801    - 
Conversion of preferred stock   12,084,942    -    -    -    -    - 
Redemption of preferred stock   7,437    -    -    -    -    - 
Stock option exercises   800,347    -    806,580    -    1,056,368    - 
Purchases of treasury stock   (1,667,592   -    -    -    (9,763,200   - 
Stock awards   140,090    -    81,781    -    109,739    - 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period   155,759,293    -    144,394,069    -    143,505,708    - 
                         
Treasury stock                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period   20,601,686    (781   20,601,686    (781   10,838,486    (403
Purchases of treasury stock, including related fees   1,667,592    (48   -    -    9,763,200    (378
                         
Balance as of the end of the period   22,269,278    (829   20,601,686    (781   20,601,686    (781
                         
Additional paid-in capital                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period      522       495       469 
Indemnification of demerger liability      -       -       2 
Stock-based compensation, net of tax      19       13       14 
Stock option exercises, net of tax      33       14       10 
                         
Balance as of the end of the period      574       522       495 
                         
Retained earnings                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period      1,505       1,040       793 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation      377       498       281 
Series A common stock dividends      (28      (23      (24
Preferred stock dividends      (3      (10      (10
                         
Balance as of the end of the period      1,851       1,505       1,040 
                         
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period      (660      (580      196 
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities      (1      (3      (23
Foreign currency translation      37       5       (130
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps      17       15       (79
Pension and postretirement benefits      (63      (97      (544
                         
Balance as of the end of the period      (670      (660      (580
                         
Total Celanese Corporation shareholders’ equity      926       586       174 
                         
Noncontrolling interests                        
Balance as of the beginning of the period      -       2       5 
Divestiture of noncontrolling interests      -       (2      (2
Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests      -       -       (1
                         
Balance as of the end of the period      -       -       2 
                         
Total shareholders’ equity      926       586       176 
                         
 
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


7784


 
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Operating activities            
Net earnings (loss)  488   281   427 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Other charges (gains), net of amounts used  73   111   30 
Depreciation, amortization and accretion  319   360   311 
Deferred income taxes, net  (402)  (69)  23 
(Gain) loss on disposition of businesses and assets, net  (40)  1   (74)
Refinancing expense  -   -   256 
Other, net  22   36   (2)
Operating cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  (2)  3   (84)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
Trade receivables — third party and affiliates, net  (79)  339   (69)
Inventories  30   21   (27)
Other assets  9   53   66 
Trade payables — third party and affiliates  104   (265)  (11)
Other liabilities  74   (285)  (280)
             
Net cash provided by operating activities  596   586   566 
Investing activities            
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment  (176)  (274)  (288)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired  ( 9)  -   (269)
Proceeds from sale of businesses and assets, net  171   9   715 
Deferred proceeds on Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation  412   311   - 
Capital expenditures related to Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation  (351)  (185)  (21)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  15   202   69 
Purchases of marketable securities  -   (91)  (59)
Changes in restricted cash  -   -   46 
Settlement of cross currency swap agreements  -   (93)  - 
Other, net  (31)  (80)  (50)
             
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  31   (201)  143 
Financing activities            
Short-term borrowings (repayments), net  (9)  (64)  30 
Proceeds from long-term debt  -   13   2,904 
Repayments of long-term debt  (80)  (47)  (3,053)
Refinancing costs  (3)  -   (240)
Purchases of treasury stock, including related fees  -   (378)  (403)
Stock option exercises  14   18   69 
Series A common stock dividends  (23)  (24)  (25)
Preferred stock dividends  (10)  (10)  (10)
Other, net  (1)  (7)  14 
             
Net cash used in financing activities  (112)  (499)  (714)
Exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents  63   (35)  39 
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  578   (149)  34 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  676   825   791 
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period        1,254         676          825 
             
              ��              
  2010 2009 2008  
  Shares
   Shares
   Shares
    
  Outstanding Amount Outstanding Amount Outstanding Amount  
           As Adjusted (Note 4)  
  (In $ millions, except share data)  
Comprehensive income (loss)                            
Net earnings (loss)       377        498        280     
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax                            
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities       (1       (3      (23    
Foreign currency translation       37       5       (130    
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps       17       15       (79    
Pension and postretirement benefits       (63      (97      (544    
                             
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax       367       418       (496    
                             
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests       -       -       1     
                             
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation       367       418       (495    
                             
 
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


7885


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
    As Adjusted (Note 4)
  (In $ millions)
Operating activities            
Net earnings (loss)   377    498    280 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities            
Other charges (gains), net of amounts used   (5   73    111 
Depreciation, amortization and accretion   300    319    360 
Deferred income taxes, net   15    (402   (69
(Gain) loss on disposition of businesses and assets, net   (8   (40   1 
Refinancing expense   16    -    - 
Other, net   11    12    37 
Operating cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations   8    (2   3 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities            
Trade receivables — third party and affiliates, net   (90   (79   339 
Inventories   (98   30    21 
Other assets   9    9    53 
Trade payables — third party and affiliates   19    104    (265
Other liabilities   (102   74    (285
             
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities   452    596    586 
Investing activities            
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment   (201   (176   (274
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired   (46   (9   - 
Proceeds from sale of businesses and assets, net   26    171    9 
Deferred proceeds on Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation   -    412    311 
Capital expenditures related to Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation   (312   (351   (185
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities   -    15    202 
Purchases of marketable securities   -    -    (91
Settlement of cross currency swap agreements   -    -    (93
Other, net   (27   (31   (80
             
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (560   31    (201
Financing activities            
Short-term borrowings (repayments), net   (16   (9   (64
Proceeds from long-term debt   600    -    13 
Repayments of long-term debt   (897   (80   (47
Refinancing costs   (24   (3   - 
Purchases of treasury stock, including related fees   (48   -    (378
Stock option exercises   14    14    18 
Series A common stock dividends   (28   (23   (24
Preferred stock dividends   (3   (10   (10
Other, net   14    (1   (7
             
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (388   (112   (499
Exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents   (18   63    (35
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   (514   578    (149
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   1,254    676    825 
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   740    1,254    676 
             
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


86


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
1. Description of the Company and Basis of Presentation
 
Celanese Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) is a leading global integrated chemicaltechnology and advancedspecialty materials company. The Company’s business involves processing chemical raw materials, such as methanol, carbon monoxide and ethylene, and natural products, including wood pulp, into value-added chemicals, thermoplastic polymers and other chemical-based products.
 
Definitions
 
In this Annual Report onForm 10-K (“Annual Report”), the term “Celanese” refers to Celanese Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and not its subsidiaries. The term “Celanese US” refers to the Company’s subsidiary, Celanese US Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly known as BCP Crystal US Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation, and not its subsidiaries. The term “Purchaser” refers to the Company’s subsidiary, Celanese Europe Holding GmbH & Co. KG, formerly known as BCP Crystal Acquisition GmbH & Co. KG, a German limited partnership, and not its subsidiaries, except where otherwise indicated. The term “Original Shareholders” refers, collectively, to Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 1, Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 2, Blackstone Capital Partners (Cayman) Ltd. 3 and BA Capital Investors Sidecar Fund, L.P. The term “Advisor” refers to Blackstone Management Partners, an affiliate of The Blackstone Group.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for all periods presented. The consolidated financial statements and other financial information included in this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, have been presented to separately show the effects of discontinued operations.
 
In the ordinary course of the business, the Company enters into contracts and agreements relative to a number of topics, including acquisitions, dispositions, joint ventures, supply agreements, product sales and other arrangements. The Company endeavors to describe those contracts or agreements that are material to its business, results of operations or financial position. The Company may also describe some arrangements that are not material but which the Company believes investors may have an interest in or which may have been subject to aForm 8-K filing. Investors should not assume the Company has described all contracts and agreements relative to the Company’s business in this Annual Report.
 
2. Summary of Accounting Policies
 
• Consolidation principles
• Consolidation principles
 
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP for all periods presented and include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries over which the Company exercises control. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
• Estimates and assumptions
• Estimates and assumptions
 
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and allocated charges during the reporting period. Significant estimates pertain to impairments of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets, purchase price allocations, restructuring costs and other (charges) gains, net, income taxes, pension and other postretirement benefits, asset retirement obligations, environmental liabilities and loss contingencies, among others. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


79


• Cash and cash equivalents
• Cash and cash equivalents
 
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.


87


• Inventories
• Inventories
 
Inventories, including stores and supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost for inventories is determined using thefirst-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Cost includes raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Cost for stores and supplies is primarily determined by the average cost method.
 
• Investments in marketable securities
• Investments in marketable securities
 
The Company classifies its investments in debt and equity securities as“available-for-sale” and reports those investments at their fair market values in the consolidated balance sheets as Marketable Securities, at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses, net of the related tax effect onavailable-for-sale securities, are excluded from earnings and are reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net until realized. The cost of securities sold is determined by using the specific identification method.
 
A decline in the market value of anyavailable-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to beother-than-temporary results in a reduction in the carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. To determine whether impairment isother-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery and evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary. Evidence considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and duration of the impairment, changes in value subsequent to year end and forecasted performance of the investee.
 
• Investments in affiliates
• Investments in affiliates
 
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 323,Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures(“FASB ASC Topic 323”), stipulates that the equity method should be used to account for investments whereby an investor has “the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of an investee”, but does not exercise control. FASB ASC Topic 323 generally considers an investor to have the ability to exercise significant influence when it owns 20% or more of the voting stock of an investee. In certain instances, the financial information of the Company’s equity investees is not available timely. Accordingly, the Company records its proportional share of the investee’s earnings or losses on a consistent lag of no more than one quarter. FASB ASC Topic 323 lists circumstances under which, despite 20% ownership, an investor may not be able to exercise significant influence. Certain investments where the Company owns greater than a 20% ownership and cannot exercise significant influence or control are accounted for under the cost method of accounting (Note 8).
 
The Company assesses the recoverability of the carrying value of its investments whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate a loss in value that is other than a temporary decline. A loss in value of an equity-methodequity method or cost-methodcost method investment which is other than a temporary decline will be recognized as the difference between the carrying amount of the investment and its fair value.
 
The Company’s estimates of fair value are determined based on a discounted cash flow model. The Company periodically engages third-party valuation consultants to assist with this process.
 
• Property, plant and equipment, net
• Property, plant and equipment, net
 
Land is recorded at historical cost. Buildings, machinery and equipment, including capitalized interest, and property under capital lease agreements, are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. The Company records depreciation and amortization in its consolidated statements of operations as either Cost of sales or Selling, general and administrative expenses consistent with the utilization of the underlying assets. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives of depreciable assets:
 
   
Land Improvementsimprovements 20 years
Buildings and improvements 30 years
Machinery and Equipmentequipment 20 years


8088


Leasehold improvements are amortized over ten years or the remaining life of the respective lease, whichever is shorter.
 
Accelerated depreciation is recorded when the estimated useful life is shortened. Ordinary repair and maintenance costs, including costs for planned maintenance turnarounds, that do not extend the useful life of the asset are charged to earnings as incurred. Fully depreciated assets are retained in property and depreciation accounts until sold or otherwise disposed. In the case of disposals, assets and related depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the net amounts, less proceeds from disposal, are included in earnings.
 
The Company also leases property, plant and equipment under operating and capital leases. Rent expense for operating leases, which may have escalating rentals or rent holidays over the term of the lease, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Amortization of capital lease assets is included as a component of depreciation expense.
 
Assets acquired in business combinations are recorded at their fair values and depreciated over the assets’ remaining useful lives or the Company’s policy lives, whichever is shorter.
 
The Company assesses the recoverability of the carrying amount of its property, plant and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be assessed when estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the operation and disposition of the asset group are less than the carrying amount of the asset group. Asset groups have identifiable cash flows and are largely independent of other asset groups. Measurement of an impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset group over its fair value. Fair value is measured using discounted cash flows or independent appraisals, as appropriate. Impairment losses are recorded in depreciation expense orprimarily to Other (charges) gains, net depending on the facts and circumstances.net.
 
• Goodwill and other intangible assets
• Goodwill and other intangible assets
 
Trademarks and trade names, customer-related intangible assets and other intangibles with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The excess of the purchase price over fair value of net identifiable assets and liabilities of an acquired business (“goodwill”) and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but rather tested for impairment, at least annually. The Company tests for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment during the third quarter of its fiscal year using June 30 balances.
 
The Company assesses the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the goodwill of a reporting unit may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability is measured at the reporting unit level based on the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 350,Intangibles — Goodwill and Other(“FASB ASC Topic 350”). The Company’s estimates of fair value are determined based on a discounted cash flow model. The Company periodically engages third-party valuation consultants to assist with this process. Impairment losses are recorded in other operating expense orprimarily to Other (charges) gains, net depending onnet.
Recoverability of goodwill for each reporting unit is measured using a discounted cash flow model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the factsrisks involved, which is classified as a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurements and circumstances.Disclosures(“FASB ASC Topic 820”). The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, growth rates and cash flow projections are the most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. If the calculated fair value is less than the current carrying value, impairment of the reporting unit may exist. When the recoverability test indicates potential impairment, the Company, or in certain circumstances, a third-party valuation consultant, will calculate an implied fair value of goodwill for the reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to how goodwill is calculated in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recorded to write


89


down the carrying value. An impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit but may indicate certain long-lived and amortizable intangible assets associated with the reporting unit may require additional impairment testing.
 
The Company assesses recoverability of other indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability is measured by a comparison of the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset over its fair value. Any excess of the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset over its fair value is recognized as an impairment loss. The Company’s estimates of fair value are determined based on a discounted cash flow model. The Company periodically engages third-party valuation consultants to assist with this process. Impairment losses are recorded in other operating expense orprimarily to Other (charges) gains, net depending onnet.
Management tests indefinite-lived intangible assets utilizing the factsrelief from royalty method to determine the estimated fair value for each indefinite-lived intangible asset which is classified as a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820. The relief from royalty method estimates the Company’s theoretical royalty savings from ownership of the intangible asset. Key assumptions used in this model include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections and circumstances.terminal value rates. Discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates and sales projections are the assumptions most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. Discount rates used are similar to the rates estimated by the weighted-average cost of capital (“WACC”) considering any differences in company-specific risk factors. Royalty rates are established by management and are periodically substantiated by third-party valuation consultants. Operational management, considering industry and company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and sales projections associated with each indefinite-lived intangible asset. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual sales estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates.
 
The Company assesses the recoverability of finite-lived intangible assets in the same manner as for property, plant and equipment as described above. Impairment losses are recorded in amortization expense orprimarily to Other (charges) gains, net depending on the facts and circumstances.net.


81


• Financial instruments
• Financial instruments
 
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 820Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures(“FASB ASC Topic 820”) for financial assets and liabilities. On January 1, 2009, the Company applied the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 820 for non-recurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and liabilities, such as goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and asset retirement obligations. The adoptions of FASB ASC Topic 820 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. FASB ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, and increases disclosures surrounding fair value calculations.
 
The Company manages its exposures to currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices through a risk management program that includes the use of derivative financial instruments (Note 22)21). The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes. The fair value of all derivative instruments is recorded as assets or liabilities at the balance sheet date. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are reported in income or Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net, depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting treatment under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815,Derivatives and Hedging(“FASB ASC Topic 815”).
 
Gains and losses on derivative instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net, to the extent the hedges are effective, until the underlying transactions are recognized in income.earnings. To the extent effective, gains and losses on derivative and non-derivative instruments used as hedges of the Company’s net investment in foreign operations are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net as part of the foreign currency translation adjustment. The ineffective portions of cash flow hedges and hedges of net investment in foreign operations, if any, are recognized in incomeearnings immediately. Derivative instruments not designated as hedges are marked to market at the end of each accounting period with the change in fair value recorded in income.earnings.


90


• Concentrations of credit risk
• Concentrations of credit risk
 
The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonpayment by customers and counterparties. The creditworthiness of customers and counterparties is subject to continuing review, including the use of master netting agreements, where the Company deems appropriate. The Company minimizes concentrations of credit risk through its global orientation in diverse businesses with a large number of diverse customers and suppliers. In addition, credit risksrisk arising from derivative instruments is not significant because the counterparties to these contracts are primarily major international financial institutions and, to a lesser extent, major chemical companies. Where appropriate, the Company has diversified its selection of counterparties. Generally, collateral is not required from customers and counterparties and allowances are provided for specific risks inherent in receivables.
 
• Allowance for doubtful accounts
• Deferred financing costs
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company believes, based on historical results, the likelihood of actual write-offs having a material impact on financial results is low. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated using factors such as customer credit ratings, past collection history and general risk profile. Receivables are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is probable that the receivable will not be recovered.
• Deferred financing costs
 
The Company capitalizes direct costs incurred to obtain debt financings and amortizes these costs using a method that approximates the effective interest rate method over the terms of the related debt. Upon the extinguishment of the related debt, any unamortized capitalized debt financing costs are immediately expensed.
 
• Environmental liabilities
• Environmental liabilities
 
The Company manufactures and sells a diverse line of chemical products throughout the world. Accordingly, the Company’s operations are subject to various hazards incidental to the production of industrial chemicals including the use, handling, processing, storage and transportation of hazardous materials. The Company recognizes losses and accrues liabilities relating to environmental matters if available information indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Depending on the nature of the site, the Company accrues through fifteen years, unless the Company has government orders or other agreements that extend beyond fifteen years. If the event of loss is neither probable nor reasonably estimable, but is reasonably possible, the Company provides appropriate disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements if the contingency is considered material. The Company estimates environmental liabilities on acase-by-case basis using


82


the most current status of available facts, existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations and prior experience in remediation of contaminated sites. Recoveries of environmental costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed probable.
 
An environmental reserve related to cleanup of a contaminated site might include, for example, a provision for one or more of the following types of costs: site investigation and testing costs, cleanup costs, costs related to soil and water contamination resulting from tank ruptures and post-remediation monitoring costs. These reserves do not take into account any claims or recoveries from insurance. There are no pending insurance claims for any environmental liability that are expected to be material. The measurement of environmental liabilities is based on the Company’s periodic estimate of what it will cost to perform each of the elements of the remediation effort. The Company utilizes third parties to assist in the management and development of cost estimates for its sites. Changes to environmental regulations or other factors affecting environmental liabilities are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period in which they occur (Note 16)15).
 
• Legal fees
• Legal fees
 
The Company accrues for legal fees related to loss contingency matters when the costs associated with defending these matters can be reasonably estimated and are probable of occurring. All other legal fees are expensed as incurred.


91


• Revenue recognition
• Revenue recognition
 
The Company recognizes revenue when title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer, generally at the time of shipment of products, and provided that four basic criteria are met: (1)(a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2)(b) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3)(c) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4)(d) collectibility is reasonably assured. Should changes in conditions cause the Company to determine revenue recognition criteria are not met for certain transactions, revenue recognition would be delayed until such time that the transactions become realizable and fully earned. Payments received in advance of meeting the above revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue.
 
• Research and development
• Research and development
 
The costs of research and development are charged as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.
 
• Insurance loss reserves
• Insurance loss reserves
 
The Company has two wholly ownedwholly-owned insurance companies (the “Captives”) that are used as a form of self insurance for property, liability and workers compensation risks. One of the Captives also insures certain third-party risks. The liabilities recorded by the Captives relate to the estimated risk of loss, which is based on management estimates and actuarial valuations, and unearned premiums, which represent the portion of the third-party premiums written applicable to the unexpired terms of the policies in-force. Liabilities are recognized for known claims when sufficient information has been developed to indicate involvement of a specific policy and the Company can reasonably estimate its liability. In addition, liabilities have been established to cover additional exposure on both known and unasserted claims. Estimates of the liabilities are reviewed and updated regularly. It is possible that actual results could differ significantly from the recorded liabilities. Premiums written are recognized as revenue based on the terms of the policies. Capitalization of the Captives is determined by regulatory guidelines.
 
• Reinsurance receivables
• Reinsurance receivables
 
The Captives enter into reinsurance arrangements to reduce their risk of loss. The reinsurance arrangements do not relieve the Captives from their obligations to policyholders. Failure of the reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to the Captives. The Captives evaluate the financial condition of their reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk to minimize their exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies and to establish allowances for amounts deemed non-collectible.


83


• Income taxes
• Income taxes
 
The provision for income taxes has been determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.carryforwards. The amount of deferred taxes on these temporary differences is determined using the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, as applicable, based on tax rates and laws in the respective tax jurisdiction enacted as of the balance sheet date.
 
The Company reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, applicable tax strategies and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not (likelihood of greater than 50%) that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
 
The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. Tax positions are recognized only when it is more likely than not, (likelihood of greater than 50%), based on technical merits, that the positions will be sustained upon examination. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are measured using a probability weighted approach as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon


92


settlement. Whether the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is met for a tax position is a matter of judgment based on the individual facts and circumstances of that position evaluated in light of all available evidence.
 
• Noncontrolling interests
• Noncontrolling interests
 
Noncontrolling interests in the equity and results of operations of the entities consolidated by the Company are shown as a separate line item in the consolidated financial statements. The entities included in the consolidated financial statements that have noncontrolling interests are as follows:
 
         
  Ownership Percentage
  as of December 31,
  2009 2008
 
Celanese Polisinteza d.o.o.   76%  76%
Synthesegasanlage Ruhr GmbH  50%  50%
In December 2009, the Company paid a liquidating dividend related to its ownership in Synthesegasanlage Ruhr GmbH in the amount of €1 million. The Company is currently liquidating its ownership in Synthesegasanlage Ruhr GmbH.
• Accounting for purchasing agent agreements
• Accounting for purchasing agent agreements
 
A subsidiary of the Company acts as a purchasing agent on behalf of the Company, as well as third parties. The entity arranges sale and purchase agreements for raw materials on a commission basis. Accordingly, the commissions earned on these third-party sales are classified as a reduction to Selling, general and administrative expenses.
 
• Functional and reporting currencies
• Functional and reporting currencies
 
For the Company’s international operations where the functional currency is other than the US dollar, assets and liabilities are translated using period-end exchange rates, while the statement of operations amounts are translated using the average exchange rates for the respective period. Differences arising from the translation of assets and liabilities in comparison with the translation of the previous periods or from initial recognition during the period are included as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net.


84


• Reclassifications
• Reclassifications
 
The Company has reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
 
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In JanuaryDecember 2010, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards UpdateUpdated (“ASU”)2010-02,2010-29,Accounting and ReportingBusiness Combinations: Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary — A Scope ClarificationBusiness Combinations(“ASU2010-02” 2010-29”), which amends FASB ASC Topic820-10 (“FASB ASC Topic820-10”). The update addresses implementation issues related to changes in ownership provisions in the FASB ASC820-10. The Company adopted ASU2010-02 on December 31, 2009. This update had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2009, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Update2009-05,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures(“ASU2009-05”), which amends FASB ASC Topic820-10 (“FASB ASC Topic820-10”). The update provides clarification on the techniques for measurement of fair value required of a reporting entity when a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. The Company adopted ASU2009-05 beginning September 30, 2009. This update had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 168,The FASB Accounting Standards Codificationtmand the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FAS 162(“SFAS 168”), which created FASB ASC Topic105-10 (“FASB ASC Topic105-10”). FASB ASC Topic105-10 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with US GAAP (the GAAP hierarchy). The Company adopted FASB ASC Topic105-10 beginning September 30, 2009. This standard had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165,Subsequent Events(“SFAS 165”), codified in FASB ASC Topic855-10, which establishes accounting and disclosure standards for events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It defines financial statements as available to be issued, requiring the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, whether it be the date the financial statements were issued or the date they were available to be issued. The Company adopted SFAS 165 upon issuance. This standard had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”)SFAS 115-2 andSFAS 124-2,Recognition and Presentation ofOther-Than-Temporary Impairments(“FSPSFAS 115-2 andSFAS 124-2”), which is codified in FASB ASC Topic320-10. FSPSFAS 115-2 andSFAS 124-2 provides guidance to determine whether the holder of an investment in a debt security for which changes in fair value are not regularly recognized in earnings should recognize a loss in earnings when the investment is impaired. This FSP also improves the presentation and disclosure ofother-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted FSPSFAS 115-2 andSFAS 124-2 beginning April 1, 2009. This FSP had no material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPSFAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion APB28-1,Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments(“FSPSFAS 107-1 and APB28-1”).FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB28-1, which is codified in FASB ASC Topic825-10-50, require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. The Company adopted FSPSFAS 107-1 and APB28-1 beginning April 1, 2009. This FSP had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPSFAS 157-4,Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly(“FSPSFAS 157-4”). FSPSFAS 157-4, which is codified in FASB ASC Topics820-10-35-51 and820-10-50-2, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value and emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation technique(s) used, the objective


85


of a fair value measurement remains the same. The Company adopted FSPSFAS 157-4 beginning April 1, 2009. This FSP had no material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 141(R)-1,Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies(“FSP SFAS 141(R)-1”). FSP SFAS 141(R)-1, which is codified in FASB ASC Topic 805,Business Combinations,. The update addresses application issues related todiversity in the measurement, accountinginterpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations. If a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in athe combined entity as though the business combination.combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The Company adopted FSP SFAS 141(R)-1 upon issuance.ASU2010-29 on January 1, 2011. This FSPupdate had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
In December 2008,2010, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 132(R)-1,FASB ASU2010-28,Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan AssetsIntangible – Goodwill and Other: When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts(“FSP SFAS 132(R)-1”ASU 2010-28”), which is codified inamends FASB ASC Topic715-20-50. FSP SFAS 132(R)-1 requires enhanced disclosures about 350. The update modifies Step 1 of the plan assetsgoodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For these reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a Company’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans intended to provide financial statement users with a greater understanding of: 1) how investment allocation decisions are made; 2) the major categories of plan assets; 3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; 4) the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period; and 5) significant concentrations of risk within plan assets.goodwill impairment exists. The Company adopted FSP SFAS 132(R)-1ASU2010-28 on January 1, 2009.2011. This FSPupdate had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU2010-17,Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method: Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition(“ASU2010-17”), which amends FASB ASC Topic 605,Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method.The update provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate for research or development transactions. Authoritative guidance on the use of the milestone method did not previously exist. The Company adopted ASU2010-17 on January 1, 2011. This update had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


93


In January 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU2010-06,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements(“ASU2010-06”), which amends FASB ASC Topic 820. The update provides additional disclosures for transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 and for activity in Level 3 and clarifies certain other existing disclosure requirements. The Company adopted ASU2010-06 beginning January 15, 2010. This update had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
4. Acquisitions, Dispositions, Ventures Divestitures, Asset Sales and Plant Closures
 
Acquisitions
 
In May 2010, the Company acquired two product lines, Zenite® liquid crystal polymer (“LCP”) and Thermx® polycyclohexylene-dimethylene terephthalate (“PCT”), from DuPont Performance Polymers. The acquisition will continue to build upon the Company’s position as a global supplier of high performance materials and technology-driven applications. These two product lines broaden the Company’s Ticona Engineering Polymers offerings within its Advanced Engineered Materials segment, enabling the Company to respond to a globalizing customer base, especially in the high growth electrical and electronics application markets. Pro forma financial information since the acquisition date has not been provided as the acquisition did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial information. The Company incurred $1 million in direct transaction costs as a result of this acquisition.
The Company allocated the purchase price of the acquisition to identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of purchase price over the aggregate fair values was recorded as goodwill. Intangible assets were valued using the relief from royalty and discounted cash flow methodologies which are considered a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820. The relief from royalty method estimates the Company’s theoretical royalty savings from ownership of the intangible asset. Key assumptions used in this model include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates and sales projections are the assumptions most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, growth rates and cash flow projections are the most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. The Company, with the assistance of third-party valuation consultants, calculated the fair value of the intangible assets acquired to allocate the purchase price at the respective acquisition date.
The consideration paid for the product lines and the amounts of the intangible assets acquired recognized at the acquisition date are as follows:
       
  Weighted
   
    Average Life     
  (In years) (In $ millions) 
 
Cash consideration              46  
       
       
Intangible assets acquired      
Trademarks and trade names indefinite   
Customer-related intangible assets 10   
Developed technology 10   
Covenant not to compete and other 3  11  
Goodwill    13  
       
Total    46  
       
In connection with the acquisition, the Company committed to purchase certain inventory at a future date valued at between $12 million and $17 million. During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company purchased $3 million of inventory in Europe and the US, leaving additional inventory of between $9 million and $14 million expected to be purchased in Asia during the first half of 2011.


94


In December 2009, the Company acquired the business and assets of FACT GmbH (Future Advanced Composites Technology) (“FACT”), a German company, for a purchase price of €5 million ($78 million). FACT is in the business of developing, producing and marketing long fiberlong-fiber reinforced thermoplastics. As part of the acquisition, the Company has entered into a ten year lease agreement with the seller for the property and buildings on which the FACT business is located with the option to purchase the property at various times throughout the lease. The acquired business is included in the Advanced Engineered Materials segment.
 
In January 2007, the Company acquired the cellulose acetate flake, tow and film business of Acetate Products Limited (“APL”), a subsidiary of Corsadi B.V. The purchase price for the transaction was approximately £57 million ($112 million), in addition to direct acquisition costs of approximately £4 million ($7 million). As contemplated prior to the closing of the acquisition, the Company closed the acquired tow production plant at Little Heath, United Kingdom in September 2007. In accordance with the Company’s sponsor services agreement dated January 26, 2005, as amended, the Company paid the Advisor $1 million in connection with the acquisition. The acquired business is included in the Company’s Consumer Specialties segment.
Ventures
In March 2007, the Company entered into a strategic partnership with Accsys Technologies PLC (“Accsys”), and its subsidiary, Titan Wood, to become the exclusive supplier of acetyl products to Titan Wood’s technology licensees for use in wood acetylation. In connection with this partnership, in May 2007, the Company acquired 8,115,883 shares of Accsys’ common stock representing approximately 5.45% of the total voting shares of Accsys for €22 million ($30 million). The investment was treated as anavailable-for-sale security and was included in Marketable securities, at fair value, on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. On November 20, 2007, the Company and Accsys announced that they agreed to amend their business arrangements so that each company would have a nonexclusive “at-will” trading and supply relationship to give both companies greater flexibility. As part of this amendment, the Company subsequently sold all of its shares of Accsys stock for approximately €20 million ($30 million), which resulted in a cumulative loss of $3 million.
DivestituresDispositions
 
In July 2009, the Company completed the sale of its polyvinyl alcohol (“PVOH”) business to Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. (“Sekisui”) for a net cash purchase price of $168 million, resulting in a gain on disposition of $34 million. The


86


net cash purchase price excludes the accounts receivable and payable retained by the Company. The transaction includes long-term supply agreements between Sekisui and the Company and therefore, does not qualify for treatment as a discontinued operation. The PVOH business is included in the Industrial Specialties segment.
 
Ventures
The Company indirectly owns a 25% interest in its National Methanol Company (“Ibn Sina”) affiliate through CTE Petrochemicals Company (“CTE”), a joint venture with Texas Eastern Arabian Corporation Ltd. (which also indirectly owns 25%). The remaining interest in Ibn Sina is held by Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (“SABIC”). SABIC and CTE entered into the Ibn Sina joint venture agreement in 1981. In July 2008,April 2010, the Company sold its 55.46%announced that Ibn Sina will construct a 50,000 ton polyacetal (“POM”) production facility in Saudi Arabia and that the term of the joint venture agreement was extended until 2032. Ibn Sina’s existing natural gas supply contract expires in 2022. Upon successful startup of the POM facility, the Company’s indirect economic interest in Derivados Macroquimicos S.A. de C.V. (“DEMACSA”) for proceeds of $3 million. DEMACSA produces cellulose ethers at an industrial complex in Zacapu, Michoacan, Mexico and is included in the Company’s Acetyl Intermediates segment. In June 2008, the Company recorded a long-lived asset impairment loss of $1 millionIbn Sina will increase from 25% to Cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations. As a result, the proceeds from the sale approximated the carrying value of DEMACSA on the date of the sale. The Company concluded the sale of DEMACSA is not a discontinued operation due to certain forms of continuing involvement between the Company and DEMACSA subsequent to the sale.
In August 2007, the Company sold its Films business of EVA Performance Polymers (f/k/a AT Plastics), located in Edmonton and Westlock, Alberta, Canada, to British Polythene Industries PLC (“BPI”) for $12 million. The Films business manufactures products for the agricultural, horticultural and construction industries. The Company recorded a loss on the sale of $7 million during the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company maintained ownership of the Polymers business of the business formerly known as AT Plastics, which concentrates on the development and supply of specialty resins and compounds. EVA Performance Polymers is included in the Company’s Industrial Specialties segment. The Company concluded that the sale of the Films business is not a discontinued operation due to the level of continuing cash flows between the Films business and EVA Performance Polymers’ Polymers business subsequent to the sale.32.5%. SABIC’s economic interest will remain unchanged.
 
In connection with the Company’s strategy to optimize its portfolio and divest non-core operations,this transaction, the Company announcedreassessed the factors surrounding the accounting method for this investment and changed from the cost method of accounting for investments to the equity method of accounting for investments beginning April 1, 2010. Financial information relating to this investment for prior periods has been retrospectively adjusted to apply the equity method of accounting. Effective April 1, 2010, the Company moved its investment in December 2006 its agreement to sellthe Ibn Sina affiliate from its Acetyl Intermediates segment’s oxo productssegment to its Advanced Engineered Materials segment to reflect the change in the affiliate’s business dynamics and derivatives businesses, including European Oxo GmbH (“EOXO”),growth opportunities as a 50/50 venture between Celanese GmbH and Degussa AG (“Degussa”), to Advent International, for a purchase price of €480 million ($636 million) subject to final agreement adjustments and the successful exerciseresult of the Company’s option to purchase Degussa’s 50% interest in EOXO. On February 23, 2007, the option was exercised and the Company acquired Degussa’s interest in the venture for a purchase price of €30 million ($39 million), in addition to €22 million ($29 million) paid to extinguish EOXO’s debt upon closingfuture construction of the transaction. The Company completed the sale of its oxo productsPOM facility. Business segment information for prior periods has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect this change and derivatives businesses, including the acquired 50% interest in EOXO, on February 28, 2007. The sale included the oxo and derivatives businesses at the Oberhausen, Germany, and Bay City, Texas facilities as well as portions of its Bishop, Texas facility. Also included were EOXO’s facilities within the Oberhausen and Marl, Germany plants. The former oxo products and derivatives businesses acquired by Advent International was renamed Oxea. Taking into account agreed deductions by the buyer for pension and other employee benefits and various costs for separation activities, the Company received proceeds of approximately €443 million ($585 million) at closing. The transaction resulted in the recognition of a $47 million pre-tax gain, recorded to Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations, which includes certain working capital and other adjustments, in 2007. Due to certain lease-back arrangements between the Company and the buyer and related environmental obligations of the Company, approximately $51 million of the transaction proceeds attributableconform to the fair value of the underlying land at Bay City ($1 million) and Oberhausen (€36 million) is included in deferred proceeds in noncurrent Other liabilities, and divested land with a book value of $14 million (€10 million at Oberhausen and $1 million at Bay City) remains in Property, plant and equipment, net in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Subsequent to closing, the Company and Oxea have certain site service and product supply arrangements. The site services include, but are not limited to, administrative, utilities, health and safety, waste water treatment and maintenance activities for terms which range up to fifteen years. Product supply agreements contain initial terms of up to fifteen years. The Company has no contractual ability through these agreements or any other arrangements to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of Oxea. The Company concluded, based on the nature and limited projected magnitude of the continuing business relationship between the Company and Oxea, the divestiture of the oxo products and derivatives businesses should be accounted for as a discontinued operation.
Third-party net sales include $5 million to the divested oxo products and derivative businesses for thecurrent year ended December 31, 2007 that were eliminated upon consolidation.presentation (Note 25).


8795


In accordance withThe retrospective effect of applying the Company’s sponsor services agreement dated January 26, 2005, as amended, the Company paid the Advisor $6 million in connection with the saleequity method of the oxo products and derivatives businesses.
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company discontinued its Edmonton, Alberta, Canada methanol operations, which were included in the Acetyl Intermediates segment. As a result, the earnings (loss) from operations relatedaccounting to Edmonton methanol are accounted for as discontinued operations.
Asset Sales
In May 2008, shareholders of the Company’s Koper, Slovenia legal entity votedthis investment to approve the April 2008 decision by the Company to permanently shut down this emulsions production site. The decision to shut down the site resulted in employee severance of less than $1 million, which is included in Other (charges) gains, net, in the consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2008. Currently, the facility is idle and the existing fixed assets, including machinery and equipment, buildings and land are being marketed for sale. The Koper, Slovenia legal entity is included in the Company’s Industrial Specialties segment.as follows:
                         
  Year Ended December 31, 2009 Year Ended December 31, 2008
  As
 As Adjusted for
   As
 As Adjusted for
  
  Originally
 Retrospective
 Effect of
 Originally
 Retrospective
 Effect of
  Reported Application Change Reported Application Change
  (In $ millions, except per share data)
 
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates   48    99    51    54    172    118 
Dividend income — cost investments   98    57    (41   167    48    (119
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax   241    251    10    434    433   (1)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations   484    494    10    371    370   (1
Net earnings (loss)   488    498    10    281    280    (1
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation   488    498    10    282    281    (1
Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders   478    488    10    272    271    (1
Earnings (loss) per common share — basic Continuing operations   3.30    3.37    0.07    2.44    2.44   - 
Discontinued operations   0.03    0.03    -    (0.61   (0.61   - 
                         
Net earnings (loss) — basic   3.33    3.40    0.07    1.83    1.83    - 
                         
                         
Earnings (loss) per common share — diluted Continuing operations   3.08    3.14    0.06    2.28    2.27    (0.01
Discontinued operations   0.03    0.03    -    (0.55   (0.55   - 
                         
Net earnings (loss) — diluted   3.11    3.17    0.06    1.73    1.72    (0.01
                         
 
In December 2007,The retrospective effect of applying the Company sold the assets at its Edmonton, Alberta, Canada facilityequity method of accounting to a real estate developer for approximately $35 million. As part of the agreement, the Company will retain certain environmental liabilities associated with the site. The Company derecognized $16 million of asset retirement obligations which were transferredthis investment to the buyer. consolidated balance sheets is as follows:
             
  As of December 31, 2009
  As
 As Adjusted for
  
  Originally
 Retrospective
 Effect of
  Reported Application Change
  (In $ millions)
 
Investments in affiliates   790    792    2 
Total assets   8,410    8,412    2 
Retained earnings   1,502    1,505    3 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net   (659   (660   (1
Total Celanese Corporation shareholders’ equity   584    586    2 
Total shareholders’ equity   584    586    2 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   8,410    8,412    2 
As a result of the sale,accounting change, Retained earnings as of January 1, 2008 decreased from $799 million, as originally reported using the Company recorded a gaincost method of $37accounting for investments, to $793 million using the equity method of accounting for investments.


96


The retrospective effect of applying the year ended December 31, 2007,equity method of which a gain of $34 million was recordedaccounting to Gain (loss) on disposition of businesses and assets, net inthis investment to the consolidated statements of operations.cash flows is as follows:
                         
  Year Ended December 31,
  2009 2008
  As
 As Adjusted for
   As
 As Adjusted for
  
  Originally
 Retrospective
 Effect of
 Originally
 Retrospective
 Effect of
  Reported Application Change Reported Application Change
  (In $ millions)
 
Net earnings (loss)   488    498    10    281    280    (1
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities                        
Other, net   22    12    (10   36    37    1 
 
In July 2007,The retrospective effect of applying the Company reached an agreement with Babcock & Brown, a worldwideequity method of accounting to this investment firm which specializes in real estate and utilities development, to sell the Company’s Pampa, Texas facility. The Company ceased operations at the site in December 2008. Proceeds received upon certain milestone events are treatedbusiness segment financial information (Note 25) is as deferred proceeds and included in noncurrent Other liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets until the transaction is complete (expected to be in 2010), as defined in the sales agreement. These operations are included in the Company’s Acetyl Intermediates segment. During the second half of 2008, the Company determined that two of the milestone events, which are outside of the Company’s control, were unlikely to be achieved. The Company performed a discounted cash flow analysis which resulted in a $23 million long-lived asset impairment loss recorded to Other (charges) gains, net, in the consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2008 (Note 18).follows:
                         
  Year Ended December 31,
  2009 2008
  As
 As Adjusted for
   As
 As Adjusted for
  
  Originally
 Retrospective
 Effect of
 Originally
 Retrospective
 Effect of
  Reported Application Change Reported Application Change
  (In $ millions)
 
Advanced Engineered Materials
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax
   62    114    52    69    190    121 
Acetyl Intermediates
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax
   144    102    (42   434    312    (122
 
Plant Closures
• Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company began to assess the possibility of consolidating its global acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations to strengthen the Company’s competitive position, reduce fixed costs and align future production capacities with anticipated industry demand trends. The assessment was also driven by a global shift in product consumption and included considering the probability of closing the Company’s acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations in Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom. Based on this assessment, the Company concluded that certain long-lived assets were partially impaired. Accordingly, in March 2010, the Company recorded long-lived asset impairment losses of $72 million (Note 17) to Other (charges) gains, net in the consolidated statements of operations. The Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom facility is included in the Consumer Specialties segment.
In April 2010, when the Company announced the proposed cessation of operations at the Spondon plant, the Company began the consulting process with employees and their representatives . These consultations did not result in a demonstrated basis for viable continuing operations for acetate flake and tow operations at the site. Accordingly, in August 2010, the Company announced that it will consolidate its global acetate manufacturing capabilities by closing its acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations in Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom, with operations expecting to cease in the latter part of 2011. The Company expects to serve its acetate customers under this proposal by optimizing its global production network, which includes facilities in Lanaken, Belgium; Narrows, Virginia; and Ocotlan, Mexico, as well as the Company’s acetate affiliate facilities in China.


97


The exit costs and plant shutdown costs recorded in the consolidated statements of operations related to the closure of the Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom location (Note 17) are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2010
(In $ millions)
Employee termination benefits (15
Asset impairments (72
Total exit costs recorded to Other (charges) gains, net (87
Accelerated depreciation (6
Total plant shutdown costs (6
• Pardies, France
 
In July 2009, the Company’s wholly-owned French subsidiary, Acetex Chimie S.A., completed the consultation procedureprocess with the workers council on its “Project of Closure” and social plan related to the Company’s Pardies, France facility pursuant to which the Company announced its formal plan to ceaseceased all manufacturing operations and associated activities byin December 2009. The Company agreed with the workers council on a set of measures of assistance aimed at minimizing the effects of the plant’s closing on the Pardies workforce, including training, outplacement and severance.
As a result of the Project of Closure, the Company recorded exit costs of $89 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, which included $60 million in employee termination benefits, $17 million of contract termination costs and $12 million of long-lived asset impairment losses (see Note 18) to Other charges (gains), net, in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the related held and used long-lived assets is $4 million as of December 31, 2009. In addition, the Company recorded $9 million of accelerated depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $8 million of environmental remediation reserves for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to the shutdown of the Company’s Pardies, France facility. The Pardies, France facility is included in the Acetyl Intermediates segment.
The exit costs and plant shutdown costs recorded in the consolidated statements of operations related to the “Project of Closure” (Note 17) are as follows:
         
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Employee termination benefits   (6   (60
Asset impairments   (1   (12
Contract termination costs   (3   (17
Reindustrialization costs   (3   - 
Other   1    - 
         
Total exit costs recorded to Other (charges) gains, net  (12  (89
         
         
Asset sale   -    - 
Inventory write-offs   (4   - 
Accelerated depreciation   -    (9
Other   (8   (8
         
Total plant shutdown costs   (12   (17
         
Assets Held for Sale
Assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 include plant assets with a net book value of $9 million. The plant assets held for sale relate to an agreement reached in July 2007 with Babcock & Brown, a worldwide investment firm that specializes in real estate and utilities development, to sell the Company’s Pampa, Texas facility. The plant assets are included in the Acetyl Intermediates segment.


8898


Assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 include an office building the Company sold during the year ended December 31, 2010. The office building had a net book value of $2 million and the Company recorded a gain of $14 million to Gain (loss) on disposition of businesses and assets, net, in the consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2010. The office building was included in the Other Activities segment.
 
5. Marketable Securities, at Fair Value
 
The Company’s captive insurance companiesCaptives and pension-relatednonqualified pension trusts holdavailable-for-sale securities for capitalization and funding requirements, respectively. The Company recorded realized gains (losses) as follows:
             
  Year ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Realized gain on sale of securities      8       5    10 
Realized loss on sale of securities   -    -    (10
             
Net realized gain (loss) on sale of securities   8    5    - 
             
The Company reviews all investments forother-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly or as indicators of impairment exist. Indicators of impairment include the duration and severity of the decline in fair value below carrying value as well as the intent and ability to Other income (expense),hold the investment to allow for a recovery in the market value of the investment. In addition, the Company considers qualitative factors that include, but are not limited to: (i) the financial condition and business plans of the investee including its future earnings potential, (ii) the investee’s credit rating, and (iii) the current and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee operates. If a decline in the fair value of an investment is deemed by management to beother-than-temporary, the Company writes down the carrying value of the investment to fair value, and the amount of the write-down is included in net earnings. Such a determination is dependent on the facts and circumstances relating to each investment. The Company recognized $0 million, $1 million and $0 million ofother-than-temporary impairment losses related to equity securities in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:
             
  Years ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Realized gain on sale of securities         5         10   1 
Realized loss on sale of securities  -   (10)  - 
             
Net realized gain (loss) on sale of securities  5   -            1 
             
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
 
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gain, gross unrealized loss and fair values foravailable-for-sale securities by major security type wereare as follows:
 
                                
   Gross
 Gross
      Gross
 Gross
  
 Amortized
 Unrealized
 Unrealized
 Fair
  Amortized
 Unrealized
 Unrealized
 Fair
 Cost Gain Loss Value  Cost Gain Loss Value
 (In $ millions)
US corporate debt securities   1    -    -         1 
Mutual funds   77    -    -    77 
        
As of December 31, 2010   78    -    -    78 
   (In $ millions)           
 
US government debt securities         26          2          -          28    26    2    -    28 
US corporate debt securities  1   -   -   1    1    -    -    1 
                 
Total debt securities  27   2   -   29    27    2    -    29 
Equity securities  55   -   (3)  52    55    -    (3   52 
Money market deposits and other securities  2   -   -   2 
Mutual funds   2    -    -    2 
                 
As of December 31, 2009  84   2   (3)  83    84    2    (3   83 
                 
US government debt securities  35   17   -   52 
US corporate debt securities  3   -   -   3 
         
Total debt securities  38   17   -   55 
Equity securities  55   -   (13)  42 
Money market deposits and other securities  3   -   -   3 
         
As of December 31, 2008  96   17   (13)  100 
         
 
Fixed maturities of $1 million as of December 31, 2009 by contractual maturity are shown below.2010 will mature in 2013. Actual maturities could differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without call or prepayment penalties.
         
  Amortized
  Fair
 
  Cost  Value 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Within one year         3          3 
From one to five years  -   - 
From six to ten years  -   - 
Greater than ten years  26   28 
         
Total  29   31 
         
Proceeds received from fixed maturities that mature within one year are expected to be reinvested into additional securities upon such maturity.


8999


 
6. Receivables, Net
 
        
 As of
         
 December 31,  As of December 31,
 2009 2008  2010 2009
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Trade receivables — third party and affiliates       739        656    839    739 
Allowance for doubtful accounts — third party and affiliates  (18)  (25)   (12   (18
         
Trade receivables — third party and affiliates, net  721   631    827    721 
         
Non-trade receivables        
 
Reinsurance receivables  42   33    31    49 
Income taxes receivable  64   88    60    64 
Other  149   154    163    149 
Allowance for doubtful accounts — other  -   (1)   (1   - 
         
Total  255   274 
Non-trade receivables, net   253    262 
         
 
As of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, the Company had no significant concentrations of credit risk since the Company’s customer base is dispersed across many different industries and geographies.
 
7. Inventories
 
        
 As of
         
 December 31,  As of December 31,
 2009 2008  2010 2009
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Finished goods       367        434    442    367 
Work-in-process  28   24    31    28 
Raw materials and supplies  127   119    137    127 
         
Total  522   577    610    522 
         
The Company recorded charges of $0 million and $14 million to reduce its inventories to thelower-of-cost or market for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.


90100


 
8. Investments in Affiliates
 
Equity Method
 
The Company’s equityEquity method investments and ownership interests are as follows:
 
                                                        
   Ownership
   Share of Earnings (Loss)
        Share of
   Percentage
 Carrying Value
 Year Ended
    Ownership
 Carrying
 Earnings (Loss)
   as of December 31, as of December 31, December 31,    Percentage
 Value
 Year Ended
 Segment 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2007    as of December 31, as of December 31, December 31,
   (In percentages) (In $ millions)  Business Segment 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2008
   (In percentages) (In $ millions)
European Oxo GmbH(1)
 Acetyl Intermediates  -   -   -   -   -   -   2 
Erfei, A.I.E.(3)(1)
 Acetyl Intermediates  -   45   -   1   -   -   (1) Acetyl Intermediates   -    -    -    -    -    -    - 
National Methanol Company (“Ibn Sina”) (Note 4) Advanced Engineered Materials   25    25    53    56    81    51    118 
Fortron Industries LLC Advanced Engineered
Materials
  50   50   74   77   (3)  4   16  Advanced Engineered Materials   50    50    79    74    5    (3   4 
Korea Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd.  Advanced Engineered
Materials
  50   50   159   145   14   12   14  Advanced Engineered Materials    50    50    153    159    20    14    12 
Polyplastics Co., Ltd.  Advanced Engineered
Materials
  45   45   175   189   15   19   25  Advanced Engineered Materials    45    45    229    175    37    15    19 
Una SA Advanced Engineered
Materials
  50   50   2   2   -   2   -  Advanced Engineered Materials    50    50    3    2    1    -    2 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Gendorf KG Other Activities  39   39   27   28   3   4   5  Other Activities    39    39    27    27    4    3    4 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Hoechst KG Other Activities  32   31   142   137   15   10   18  Other Activities  32    32    128    142    16    15    10 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Knapsack KG Other Activities  27   27   24   22   5   4   4  Other Activities    27    27    22    24    4    5    4 
Sherbrooke Capital Health and                              
Wellness, L.P.(2)
 Consumer Specialties  10   10   4   4   (1)  (1)  - 
Sherbrooke Capital Health and
Wellness, L.P.(2)
 Consumer Specialties    10    10    5    4    -    (1   (1
                     
Total            607   605   48   54   83 
Total (As Adjusted Note 4)            699    663    168    99    172 
                     
 
 
(1)The Company divested this investment in February 2007July 2009 as part of the sale of PVOH (Note 4). The share of earnings (loss) for this investment is included in Earnings (loss) from operation of discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
(2)The Company accounts for its 10% ownership interest in Sherbrooke Capital Health and Wellness, L.P. under the equity method of accounting because the Company is able to exercise significant influence.
(3)The Company divested this investment in July 2009 as part of the sale of PVOH (Note 4).
 
            
             Year Ended December 31,
 Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008
 2009 2008 2007    As Adjusted (Note 4)
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Affiliate net earnings  121   121   204    566    336    633 
Company’s share:            
Company’s proportional share            
Net earnings  48   54   82 (1)   168    99    172 
Dividends and other distributions  37   64   57    138    78    183 
 
Financial information for Ibn Sina is not provided to the Company timely and as a result, the Company’s proportional share is reported on a one quarter lag. Accordingly, summarized financial information of Ibn Sina presented below is as of and for the 12 months ended September 30 as follows:
 
(1)Amount does not include a $1 million liquidating dividend from Clear Lake Methanol Partners for the year ended December 31, 2007.
         
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Current assets   226    223 
Noncurrent assets   202    212 
Current liabilities   108    98 
Noncurrent liabilities   39    43 


91101


             
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Revenues   923    630    1,235 
Gross profit   403    256    578 
Net income   357    222    512 
 
Cost Method
 
The Company’sCost method investments accounted for under the cost method of accountingand ownership interests are as follows:
 
                                                      
   Ownership
        Ownership
   Dividend
   Percentage as of
 Carrying Value as of
 Dividend Income for the years
    Percentage as of
 Carrying Value as of
 Income for the
   December 31, December 31, ended December 31,    December 31, December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 Segment 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2007  Business Segment 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2008
   (In percentages) (In $ millions)    (In percentages) (In $ millions)
National Methanol Company (“Ibn Sina”) Acetyl Intermediates  25   25   54   54   41   119   78 
Kunming Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.  Consumer Specialties  30   30   14   14   10   8   7  Consumer Specialties   30    30    14    14    11    10    8 
Nantong Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.  Consumer Specialties  31   31   77   77   38   32   24  Consumer Specialties   31    31    89    77    51    38    32 
Zhuhai Cellulose Fibers Co. Ltd.  Consumer Specialties  30   30   14   14   8   6   6  Consumer Specialties   30    30    14    14    9    8    6 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Wiesbaden KG Other Activities  8   8   6   6   1   2   1  Other Activities   8    8    6    6    2    1    2 
Other            18   19   -   -   -              16    18    -    -    - 
                     
Total                  183   184   98   167   116 
Total (As Adjusted Note 4)             139    129    73    57    48 
                     
 
Certain investments where the Company owns greater than a 20% ownership interest are accounted for under the cost method of accounting because the Company cannot exercise significant influence over these entities. The Company determined that it cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities, limitations on the Company’s involvement in theday-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
 
During 2007, the Company wrote-off its remaining €1 million ($1 million) cost investment in European Pipeline Development Company B.V. (“EPDC”) and expensed €7 million ($9 million), included in Other income (expense), net, associated with contingent liabilities that became payable due to the Company’s decision to exit the pipeline development project. In June 2008, the outstanding contingent liabilities were resolved and the Company recognized a gain of €2 million ($2 million), included in Other income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of operations to remove the remaining accrual.
During 2007, the Company fully impaired its $5 million cost investment in Elemica Corporation (“Elemica”). Elemica is a network for the global chemical industry developed by 22 of the leading chemical companies in the world for the benefit of the entire industry. The impairment was included in Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations.
9. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
                
 As of December 31,  As of December 31,
 2009 2008  2010 2009
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Land  62   61    57    62 
Land improvements  44   44    39    44 
Buildings and building improvements  360   358    334    360 
Machinery and equipment  2,669   2,615    2,589    2,669 
Construction in progress  792   443    1,129    792 
         
Gross asset value  3,927   3,521    4,148    3,927 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (1,130)  (1,051)
Accumulated depreciation   (1,131   (1,130
         
Net book value  2,797   2,470 
Property, plant and equipment, net   3,017    2,797 
         


102


Assets under capital leases amounted to $272 millionincluded in the amounts above are as follows:
         
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Buildings   23    46 
Machinery and equipment   263    226 
Accumulated depreciation   (74   (55
         
Assets under capital leases, net   212    217 
         
Capitalized interest costs and $233 million, less accumulated amortization of $55 million and $38 million,depreciation expense recorded in the consolidated financial statements are as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest costs capitalized were $2 million, $6 million and $9 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Depreciation expense was $213 million, $255 million and $209 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Capitalized interest   2    2    6 
Depreciation expense   195    213    255 
 
During 20082010 and 2009, certain long-lived assets were impaired (Note 18)4 and Note 17).


92


 
10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
 
                     
  Advanced
             
  Engineered
  Consumer
  Industrial
  Acetyl
    
  Materials  Specialties  Specialties  Intermediates  Total 
  (In $ millions) 
 
As of December 31, 2007                    
Goodwill  277   264   53   278   872 
Accumulated impairment losses  -   -   (6)   -   (6) 
                     
   277   264   47   278   866 
                     
Adjustments to preacquisition tax uncertainties  (9)   2   (12)   (30)   (49) 
Exchange rate changes  (10)   (14)   (1)   (13)   (38) 
                     
As of December 31, 2008                    
Goodwill  258   252   40   235   785 
Accumulated impairment losses  -   -   (6)   -   (6) 
                     
   258   252   34   235   779 
                     
Sale of PVOH(1)
  -   -   -   -   - 
Exchange rate changes  5   5   1   8   19 
                     
As of December 31, 2009                    
Goodwill  263   257   35   243   798 
Accumulated impairment losses  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total  263   257   35   243   798 
                     
Goodwill
                     
  Advanced
        
  Engineered
 Consumer
 Industrial
 Acetyl
  
  Materials Specialties Specialties Intermediates Total
  (In $ millions)
 
As of December 31, 2008                    
Goodwill    258     252     40     235     785 
Accumulated impairment losses  -   -   (6)  -   (6)
                     
Total  258   252   34   235   779 
                     
Sale of PVOH(1)
  -   -   -   -   - 
Exchange rate changes  5   5   1   8   19 
                     
As of December 31, 2009                    
Goodwill  263   257   35   243   798 
Accumulated impairment losses  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total  263   257   35   243   798 
                     
Acquisitions (Note 4)  13   -   -   -   13 
Reallocation of Ibn Sina goodwill (Note 4)  34   -   -   (34)  - 
Exchange rate changes  (11)  (8)  -   (18)  (37)
                     
As of December 31, 2010                    
Goodwill  299   249   35   191   774 
Accumulated impairment losses  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Total  299   249   35   191   774 
                     
 
 
(1)Fully impaired goodwill of $6 million was written off related to the sale of PVOH.


103


Recoverability of goodwill is measured using a discounted cash flow model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each reporting unit which is classified as a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, growth rates and cash flow projections are the most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. If the calculated fair value is less than the current carrying value, impairment of the reporting unit may exist. When the recoverability test indicates potential impairment, the Company, or in certain circumstances, a third-party valuation consultant, will calculate an implied fair value of goodwill for the reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to how goodwill is calculated in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded to write down the carrying value. An impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit but may indicate certain long-lived and amortizable intangible assets associated with the reporting unit may require additional impairment testing.
 
In connection with the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test performed during the three months ended September 30, 20092010 using June 30 balances, the Company did not record an impairment loss related to goodwill as the estimated fair value for each of the Company’s reporting units exceeded the carrying value of the underlying assets by a substantial margin. No events or changes in circumstances occurred during the three months ended December 31, 20092010 that would indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, as such,recoverable. Accordingly, no additional impairment analysis was performed during that period.


93


 
11. Intangible Assets, Net
Intangible Assets, Net
 
                                                
     Customer-
   Covenants
        Customer-
   Covenants
  
 Trademarks
   Related
   not to
    Trademarks
   Related
   not to
  
 and
   Intangible
 Developed
 Compete
    and
   Intangible
 Developed
 Compete
  
 Trade names Licenses Assets Technology and Other Total  Trade names Licenses Assets Technology and Other Total
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Gross Asset Value                                                
As of December 31, 2007  85   -   562   12   12   671 
Acquisitions  -   28(1)   -   -   -   28 
Exchange rate changes  (3)   1   (25)   -   -   (27) 
             
As of December 31, 2008  82   29   537   12   12   672   82   29   537   12   12   672 
Acquisitions  -   -   -   1   -   1   -   -   -   1   -   1 
Exchange rate changes  1   -   15   -   -   16   1   -   15   -   -   16 
                         
As of December 31, 2009  83   29   552   13   12   689   83   29   552   13   12   689 
Acquisitions (Note 4)  9   -   6   7   11   33 
Exchange rate changes  (4)  1   (32)  -   -   (35)
            
As of December 31, 2010  88   30   526   20   23   687 
            
  
Accumulated Amortization                                                
As of December 31, 2007  -   -   (228)   (9)   (9)   (246) 
Amortization  -   (3)   (71)   (1)   (1)   (76) 
Exchange rate changes  -   -   14   -   -   14 
             
As of December 31, 2008  -   (3)   (285)   (10)   (10)   (308)   -   (3)  (285)  (10)  (10)  (308)
Amortization  (5)   (3)   (67)   (1)   (1)   (77)   (5)  (3)  (67)  (1)  (1)  (77)
Exchange rate changes  -   -   (10)   -   -   (10)   -   -   (10)  -   -   (10)
                         
As of December 31, 2009  (5)   (6)   (362)   (11)   (11)   (395)   (5)  (6)  (362)  (11)  (11)  (395)
Amortization  -   (3)  (54)  (1)  (3)  (61)
Exchange rate changes  -   (1)  21   1   -   21 
            
As of December 31, 2010  (5)  (10)  (395)  (11)  (14)  (435)
                         
Net book value  78   23   190   2   1   294   83   20   131   9   9   252 
                         
 
(1)Acquisition of a sole and exclusive license to patents and patent applications related to acetic acid. The license is being amortized over 10 years.
Aggregate amortizationAmortization expense for intangible assets with finite lives duringis recorded in the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $72 million, $76 million, and $72 million, respectively. consolidated statements of operations as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Amortization of intangible assets  61   72   76 
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company recorded accelerated amortization expense to Amortization of intangible assets in the consolidated statements of operations of $5 million related to the AT Plastics trade name, which was discontinued August 1, 2009. The trade name is now fully amortized.


104


Estimated amortization expense for the succeeding five fiscal years is approximately $62 million in 2010, $57 million in 2011, $43 million in 2012, $26 million in 2013, and $15 million in 2014. as follows:
     
  (In $ millions)  
 
2011  63 
2012  47 
2013  29 
2014  18 
2015  8 
The Company’s trademarks and trade names have an indefinite life. Accordingly, no amortization expense is recorded on these intangible assets.
Management tests indefinite-lived intangible assets utilizing the relief from royalty method to determine the estimated fair value for each indefinite-lived intangible asset which is classified as a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820. The relief from royalty method estimates the Company’s theoretical royalty savings from ownership of the intangible asset. Key assumptions used in this model include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates and sales projections are the assumptions most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment. Discount rates used are similar to the rates estimated by the weighted-average cost of capital (“WACC”) considering any differences in Company-specific risk factors. Royalty rates are established by management and are periodically substantiated by third-party valuation consultants. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and sales projections associated with each indefinite-lived intangible asset. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual sales estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates.
 
In connection with the Company’s annual indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test performed during the three months ended September 30, 20092010 using June 30 balances, the Company recordeddid not record an impairment loss of less


94


than $1 million to certain indefinite-lived intangible assets. The fair value of such indefinite-lived intangible assets is $2 million as the estimated fair value for each of December 31, 2009.the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets exceeded the carrying value of the underlying asset. No events or changes in circumstances occurred during the three months ended December 31, 20092010 that would indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, as such,recoverable. Accordingly, no additional impairment analysis was performed during that period.
For the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, the Company did not renew or extend any intangible assets.
 
12.11. Current Other Liabilities
 
                
 As of December 31,  As of December 31,
 2009 2008  2010 2009
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Salaries and benefits  100   107    111    100 
Environmental (Note 16)  13   19 
Restructuring (Note 18)  99   32 
Environmental (Note 15)  16   13 
Restructuring (Note 17) ��57   99 
Insurance  37   34   27   37 
Asset retirement obligations  22   9   31   22 
Derivatives  75   67 
Current portion of benefit obligations (Note 15)  49   57 
Derivatives (Note 21)  69   75 
Current portion of benefit obligations (Note 14)  49   49 
Sales and use tax/foreign withholding tax payable  15   16   15   15 
Interest  20   54   29   20 
Uncertain tax positions (Note 19)  5   - 
Uncertain tax positions (Note 18)  15   5 
Other  176   179   177   176 
         
Total  611   574   596   611 
         
 
13.12. Noncurrent Other Liabilities
 
                
 As of December 31,  As of December 31,
 2009 2008  2010 2009
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Environmental (Note 16)  93   79 
Environmental (Note 15)   85    93 
Insurance  85   85   69   85 
Deferred revenue  49   55   41   47 
Deferred proceeds (Note 4, Note 29)  846   371 
Deferred proceeds(1)
  786   848 
Asset retirement obligations  45   40   46   45 
Derivatives  44   76 
Derivatives (Note 21)  14   44 
Income taxes payable  61   -   4   61 
Other  83   100   30   83 
         
Total  1,306   806    1,075    1,306 
         


95105


(1)Primarily relates to proceeds received from the Frankfurt, Germany Airport as part of a settlement for the Company to relocate its Kelsterbach, Germany Ticona operations to a new site (Note 28). Such proceeds will be deferred until the transfer of title to the Frankfurt, Germany Airport.
Changes in asset retirement obligations are as follows:
 
                     
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Balance at beginning of year  49   47   59   67   49   47 
Additions(1)  14 (1)  6 (2)  -   -   14   6 
Accretion  2   3   5   3   2   3 
Payments  (14)  (6)  (6)  (15)  (14)  (6)
Divestitures  -   -   (16) (3)
Purchase accounting adjustments  -   -   3 
Revisions to cash flow estimates  15 (4)  1   (2)
Revisions to cash flow estimates(2)
  23   15   1 
Exchange rate changes  1   (2)  4   (1)  1   (2)
             
Balance at end of year  67   49   47   77   67   49 
             
 
 
(1)RelatesPrimarily relates to a site forsites and impaired long-lived assets (Note 17) which management no longer considers to have an indeterminate life.
 
(2)Relates to long-lived assets impaired (Note 18) for which management no longer considers to have an indeterminate life.
(3)Relates to the sale of the Edmonton, Alberta, Canada plant (Note 4).
(4)Primarily relates to long-lived assets impaired (Note 18) based on triggering events assessed byrevisions to the Company in 2008 and decisions made by the Company in 2009.estimated cost of future plant closures.
 
Included in the asset retirement obligations for each of the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 20082009 is $10 million related to a business acquired in 2005. The Company has a corresponding receivable of $3 million and $7$10 million included in current Other assets and noncurrent Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets respectively, as of December 31, 2009.2010.
 
BasedThe Company concluded several sites no longer had an indeterminate life based on long-lived asset impairment triggering events assessed by the Company in December 2008 and decisions made by the Company in 2009, the Company concluded several sites no longer have an indeterminate life.Company. Accordingly, the Company recorded asset retirement obligations associated with these sites. The Company uses the expected present value technique toTo measure the fair value of the asset retirement obligations, the Company uses the expected present value technique which is classified as a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820. The expected present value technique uses a set of cash flows that represent the probability-weighted average of all possible cash flows based on the Company’s judgment. The Company uses the following inputs to determine the fair value of the asset retirement obligations based on the Company’s experience with fulfilling obligations of this type and the Company’s knowledge of market conditions: a) labor costs; b) allocation of overhead costs; c) profit on labor and overhead costs; d) effect of inflation on estimated costs and profits; e) risk premium for bearing the uncertainty inherent in cash flows, other than inflation; f) time value of money represented by the risk-free interest rate commensurate with the timing of the associated cash flows; and g) nonperformance risk relating to the liability which includes the Company’s own credit risk.
 
The Company has identified but not recognized asset retirement obligations related to certain of its existing operating facilities. Examples of these types of obligations include demolition, decommissioning, disposal and restoration activities. Legal obligations exist in connection with the retirement of these assets upon closure of the facilities or abandonment of the existing operations. However, the Company currently plans on continuing operations at these facilities indefinitely and therefore a reasonable estimate of fair value cannot be determined at this time. In the event the Company considers plans to abandon or cease operations at these sites, an asset retirement obligation will be reassessed at that time. If certain operating facilities were to close, the related asset retirement obligations could significantly affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.


96106


 
14.13. Debt
 
                
 As of December 31,  As of December 31,
 2009 2008  2010 2009
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt — third party and affiliates                
Current installments of long-term debt  102   81   74   102 
Short-term borrowings, principally comprised of amounts due to affiliates  140   152 
Short-term borrowings, including amounts due to affiliates, weighted average interest rate of 3.3%  154   140 
         
Total  242   233   228   242 
         
Long-term debt                
Senior credit facilities: Term loan facility due 2014  2,785   2,794 
Term notes 7.125%, due 2009  -   14 
Senior credit facilities        
Term B loan facility due 2014  508   2,785 
Term C loan facility due 2016  1,409   - 
Senior unsecured notes due 2018  600   - 
Pollution control and industrial revenue bonds, interest rates ranging from 5.7% to 6.7%, due at various dates through 2030  181   181   181   181 
Obligations under capital leases and other secured borrowings due at various dates through 2054  242   211 
Other bank obligations, interest rates ranging from 2.3% to 5.3%, due at various dates through 2014  153   181 
Obligations under capital leases and other secured and unsecured borrowings, interest rates ranging from 6.3% to 25.7%, due at various dates through 2054  245   242 
Other bank obligations, interest rates ranging from 1.2% to 5.5%, due at various dates through 2017  121   153 
         
Subtotal  3,361   3,381   3,064   3,361 
Less: Current installments of long-term debt  102   81 
Current installments of long-term debt  (74)  (102)
         
Total  3,259   3,300   2,990   3,259 
         
Senior Notes
On September 24, 2010, Celanese US completed an offering of $600 million in aggregate principal amount of6 5/8% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “Notes”) in a private placement conducted pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by Celanese and each of the domestic subsidiaries of Celanese US that guarantee its obligations under its senior secured credit facilities (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”).
The Notes were issued under an indenture dated September 24, 2010 (the “Indenture”) among Celanese US, Celanese, the Subsidiary Guarantors and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The Notes bear interest at a rate of6 5/8% per annum and were priced at 100% of par. Celanese US will pay interest on the Notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year commencing on April 15, 2011. The Notes will mature on October 15, 2018 and the Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after October 15, 2014 at the redemption prices specified in the Indenture. Prior to October 15, 2014, Celanese US may redeem some or all of the Notes at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus a “make-whole” premium as specified in the Indenture. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Celanese US and rank equally in right of payment with all other unsubordinated indebtedness of Celanese US.
The holders of the Notes are entitled to the benefits of a registration rights agreement dated September 24, 2010 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), by and among Celanese US and the initial purchasers listed therein. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, Celanese US has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to file a registration statement (an “Exchange Offer Registration Statement”) with respect to a registered exchange offer (an “Exchange Offer”) to exchange the Notes for new notes with terms substantially identical in all material respects to the Notes (except that the new notes will not have transfer restrictions, registration rights or be entitled to Additional


107


Interest (as defined below)), to cause the Exchange Offer Registration Statement to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act and to consummate the Exchange Offer by the 270th day after the date of the initial issuance of the Notes (June 21, 2011).
If, on or before the 270th day after the original issue date of the Notes, (a) Celanese US has not exchanged the new notes for all Notes validly tendered in accordance with the terms of an Exchange Offer or, if required, a shelf registration statement covering resales of the Notes has not been declared effective, or (b) a shelf registration statement covering resales of the Notes is required and becomes effective but such shelf registration statement ceases to be effective during the period specified in the Registration Rights Agreement (subject to certain exceptions) (each such event referred to in clauses (a) and (b) of this paragraph, a “Registration Default”), then additional interest (“Additional Interest”) shall accrue on the outstanding principal amount of the Notes from and including the date on which such Registration Default has occurred at a rate of 0.25% per annum for the first 90 day period immediately following such date and will increase by an additional 0.25% per annum at the end of each subsequent 90 day period, up to a maximum rate of 1.00% per annum; provided, however, that Additional Interest will not accrue in respect of more than one Registration Default at any time. Additional Interest will cease to accrue upon the earliest to occur of (i) the date on which the Registration Default giving rise to such Additional Interest shall have been cured and (ii) the date that is the second anniversary of the closing date of the offering.
The Indenture contains covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to incur indebtedness; grant liens on assets; merge, consolidate, or sell assets; pay dividends or make other restricted payments; engage in transactions with affiliates; or engage in other businesses.
 
Senior Credit Facilities
 
On September 29, 2010, Celanese US, Celanese, and certain of the domestic subsidiaries of Celanese US entered into an amendment agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) with the lenders under Celanese US’s existing senior secured credit facilities in order to amend and restate the corresponding Credit Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2007 (as previously amended, the “Existing Credit Agreement”, and as amended and restated by the Amendment Agreement, the “Amended Credit Agreement”).
Prior to entering into the Amendment Agreement, Celanese US, through its subsidiaries, prepaid outstanding term loan borrowings under the Existing Credit Agreement in an aggregate principal amount of $800 million using the proceeds from the issuance of the Notes and cash on hand. The Company’s senior credit agreement consistsprepaid principal amount was comprised of $2,280$649 million of US dollar-denominated term loan facility and €400€114 million of Euro-denominated term loans due 2014, aloan facility.
As part of the Amendment Agreement, $1,140 million of US dollar-denominated term loan facility and €204 million of Euro-denominated term loan facility under the Existing Credit Agreement were converted into the Term C loan facility having an extended maturity of October 31, 2016. The non-extended portions of the Term B loan facility were continued under the Amended Credit Agreement as the Term B loan facility, having principal amounts of $417 million and €69 million, respectively, without change to the maturity date of April 2, 2014. Additionally, Celanese US extended $600 million of revolving credit facility terminating in 2013 and acommitments to October 31, 2015. The maturity date of the revolving credit facility will be accelerated to January 1, 2014 if, on such date, the aggregate principal amount of the Term B loan facility outstanding is $450 million or more. The maturity of the $228 million credit-linked revolving facility terminating in 2014. 2014 was not extended under the Amendment Agreement.


108


A summary of the Amendment Agreement changes from the Existing Credit Agreement to the Amended Credit Agreement is as follows:
           
  US dollar-
 Euro dollar-
  
  denominated
 denominated
  
  term loan term loan Maturity Date
  (In millions)  
 
Existing Credit Agreement          
Balance as of September 23, 2010 $2,212  388  April 2, 2014
Principal paydown on September 24, 2010  (649)  (114)  
1% annual amortization payment of principal paid quarterly, pro-rated from July 2, 2010 to September 29, 2010  (6)  (1)  
           
Balance as of September 29, 2010 $1,557  273   
           
Amended Credit Agreement          
Term C loan facility $1,140  204  October 31, 2016
Term B loan facility  417   69  April 2, 2014
           
Total $1,557  273   
           
As of December 31, 2010, the balances available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility and the credit-linked revolving facility are as follows:
(In $ millions)  
Revolving credit facility
Borrowings outstanding-
Letters of credit issued-
Available for borrowing600
Credit-linked revolving facility
Letters of credit issued83
Available for borrowing145
Borrowings under the senior credit agreementAmended Credit Agreement will continue to bear interest at a variable interest rate based on LIBOR (for US dollars) or EURIBOR (for Euros), as applicable, or, for US dollar-denominated loans under certain circumstances, a base rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for the term loansTerm B loan facility and any loansborrowings under the credit-linked revolving facility is 1.75%, above LIBOR or EURIBOR, as applicable, subject to potential reductionsreduction by 0.25% if the Company’s total net leverage ratio is 2.25:1.00 or less. The applicable margin for the Term C loan facility is 3.00% above LIBOR or EURIBOR, as defined inapplicable, subject to increase by 0.25% if the senior credit agreement. AsCompany’s total net leverage ratio is above 2.25:1.00, and subject to reduction by 0.25% if the Company’s total net leverage ratio is 1.75:1.00 or less. The applicable margin for the Term B loan facility and any borrowings under the credit-linked revolving facility is 1.5% as of December 31, 2009, the2010. The applicable margin was 1.75%.for the Term C loan facility is 3.0%, as of December 31, 2010. The term loansapplicable margin for borrowings under the seniorrevolving credit agreementfacility is currently 2.50% above LIBOR or EURIBOR, as applicable, subject to increase or reduction in certain circumstances based on changes in the Company’s corporate credit ratings. Term loan borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement are subject to amortization at 1% of the initial principal amount per annum, payable quarterly.
The remaining principal amountAmended Credit Agreement is guaranteed by Celanese and certain domestic subsidiaries of Celanese US and is secured by a lien on substantially all assets of Celanese US and such guarantors, subject to certain agreed exceptions (including for certain real property and certain shares of foreign subsidiaries), pursuant to the term loans is due onGuarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of April 2, 2014.
As of December 31, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings or letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2009, there were $88 million of letters of credit issued under the credit-linked revolving facility and $140 million remained available for borrowing.
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the senior credit agreement. The amendment reduced the amount available under the revolving credit facility from $650 million to $600 million and increased the first lien senior secured leverage ratio covenant that is applicable when any amount is outstanding under the revolving credit portion of the senior credit agreement at set forth below. Prior to giving effect to the amendment, the maximum first lien senior secured leverage ratio was 3.90 to 1.00. As amended, the maximum senior secured leverage ratio for the following trailing four-quarter periods is as follows:
First Lien Senior
Secured Leverage Ratio
December 31, 20095.25 to 1.00
March 31, 20104.75 to 1.00
June 30, 20104.25 to 1.00
September 30, 20104.25 to 1.00
December 31, 2010 and thereafter3.90 to 1.00
2007.


97109


As a condition to borrowing funds or requesting that letters of credit be issued under thatthe revolving facility, the Company’s first lien senior secured leverage ratio (as calculated as of the last day of the most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered under the revolving facility) cannot exceed a certainthe threshold as specified above.below. Further, the Company’s first lien senior secured leverage ratio must be maintained at or below that threshold while any amounts are outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
The Company’s amended maximum first lien senior secured leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of consolidated first lien senior secured debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, subject to adjustment identified in the credit agreement.
Based on theratios, estimated first lien senior secured leverage ratio forratios and the trailing four quarters at December 31, 2009, the Company’s borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility is currently $600 million. Asas of December 31, 2009, the Company estimates its first lien senior secured leverage ratio to be 3.39 to 1.00 (which would be 4.11 to 1.00 were the revolving credit facility fully drawn). The maximum first lien senior secured leverage ratio under the revolving credit facility for such period is 5.25 to 1.00.2010 are as follows:
First Lien Senior Secured Leverage Ratios
MaximumEstimateEstimate, if Fully DrawnBorrowing Capacity
(In $ millions)
December 31, 2010 and thereafter3.9 to 1.001.8 to 1.002.4 to 1.00600
 
The Company’s senior credit agreement alsoAmended Credit Agreement contains a number of restrictions on certain of its subsidiaries,covenants that are substantially similar to those found in the Existing Credit Agreement, including, but not limited to, restrictions on theirthe Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to incur indebtedness; grant liens on assets; merge, consolidate, or sell assets; pay dividends or make other restricted payments; make investments; prepay or modify certain indebtedness; engage in transactions with affiliates; enter into sale-leaseback transactions or certain hedge transactions; or engage in other businesses.
The senior credit agreementAmended Credit Agreement also containsmaintains, from the Existing Credit Agreement, a number of affirmative covenants and events of default, including a cross default to other debt of certain ofCelanese, Celanese US, or their subsidiaries, including the Company’s subsidiariesNotes, in an aggregate amount equal to more than $40 million and the occurrence of a change of control. Failure to comply with these covenants, or the occurrence of any other event of default, could result in acceleration of the loansborrowings and other financial obligations under the Company’s senior credit agreement.Amended Credit Agreement.
 
The senior credit agreement is guaranteed by Celanese Holdings LLC,As a subsidiary of Celanese Corporation, and certain domestic subsidiariesresult of the Company’s subsidiary, Celanese US Holdings LLC (“Celanese US”), a Delaware limited liability company,Amendment Agreement and is secured by a lien on substantially all assetsthe issuance of Celanese USthe Notes, the Company accelerated amortization of deferred financing costs of $8 million and such guarantors, subjectincurred other refinancing expenses of $8 million which combined are recorded to certain agreed exceptions, pursuantRefinancing expense in the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Company recorded deferred financing costs of $7 million related to the GuaranteeAmendment Agreement and Collateral Agreement, dated$9 million related to the issuance of the Notes. These deferred financing costs combined with existing deferred financing costs are included in noncurrent Other assets in the consolidated balance sheet as of April 2, 2007, byDecember 31, 2010. Deferred financing costs of $18 million and among Celanese Holdings LLC, Celanese US, certain subsidiaries$9 million are being amortized over the terms of Celanese USthe Amendment Agreement and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch,the Notes, respectively.
Amortization of deferred financing costs recorded in the consolidated statements of operations is as Administrative Agent andfollows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Interest expense  7   7   7 
Net deferred financing costs recorded in the consolidated balance sheets are as Collateral Agent.follows:
         
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Noncurrent Other assets  27   27 


110


Principal payments scheduled to be made on the Company’s debt, including short-term borrowings, are as follows:
      
  (In $ millions) 
 
2011  228   
2012  45   
2013  46   
2014  538   
2015  42   
Thereafter  2,319   
      
Total  3,218   
      
 
The Company is in compliance with all of the covenants related to its debt agreements as of December 31, 2009.2010.
 
Debt Refinancing14. Benefit Obligations
In April 2007, the Company, through certain of its subsidiaries, entered into a new senior credit agreement. Proceeds from the new senior credit agreement, together with available cash, were used to retire the Company’s $2,454 million amended and restated (January 2005) senior credit facilities, which consisted of $1,626 million in term loans due 2011, a $600 million revolving credit facility terminating in 2009 and a $228 million credit-linked revolving facility terminating in 2009, and to retire all of the Company’s 9.625% senior subordinated notes due 2014 and 10.375% senior subordinated notes due 2014 (the “Senior Subordinated Notes”) and 10% senior discount notes due 2014 and 10.5% senior discount notes due 2014 (the “Senior Discount Notes”) as discussed below.
Substantially all of the Senior Discount Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes were tendered in the first quarter of 2007. The remaining outstanding Senior Discount Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes not tendered in conjunction with the Tender Offers were redeemed by the Company in May 2007 through optional redemption allowed in the indentures.
As a result of the refinancing, the Company incurred premiums paid on early redemption of debt of $207 million, accelerated amortization of premiums and deferred financing costs of $33 million and other refinancing expenses of $16 million.
In connection with the refinancing, the Company recorded deferred financing costs of $39 million related to the senior credit agreement, which are included in noncurrent Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and are being amortized over the term of the new senior credit agreement. The deferred financing costs consist of $23 million of costs incurred to acquire the new senior credit agreement and $16 million of debt issue costs existing prior to the refinancing.


98


For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded amortization of deferred financing costs, which is classified in Interest expense, of $7 million, $7 million, and $8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company had $27 million and $32 million of net deferred financing costs.
Principal payments scheduled to be made on the Company’s debt, including short-term borrowings, are as follows:
     
  (In $ millions) 
 
2010  242 
2011  89 
2012  65 
2013  73 
2014  2,699 
Thereafter  333 
     
Total  3,501 
     
15. Benefit Obligations
 
Pension obligations. Pension obligations are established for benefits payable in the form of retirement, disability and surviving dependent pensions. The commitments result from participation in defined contribution and defined benefit plans, primarily in the US. Benefits are dependent on years of service and the employee’s compensation. Supplemental retirement benefits provided to certain employees are nonqualified for US tax purposes. Separate trusts have been established for some nonqualified plans. Pension costs under the Company’s retirement plans are actuarially determined.
 
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in North America, Europe and Asia. Independent trusts or insurance companies administer the majority of these plans.
 
The Company sponsors various defined contribution plans in North America, Europe and Asia covering certain employees. Employees may contribute to these plans and the Company will match these contributions in varying amounts. The Company’s matching contribution to the defined contribution plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributions and aggregated $11 million, $13 million and $12 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.contributions.
 
The Company participates in multiemployer defined benefit pension plans in Europe covering certain employees. The Company’s contributions to the multiemployer defined benefit pension plans are based on specified percentages of employee contributionscontributions.
Contributions to the defined contribution plans and aggregated $6 million, $7 million and $7 million, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.multiemployer defined benefit pension plans are as follows:
                
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Defined contribution plans  14    11    13  
Multiemployer defined benefit plans  6    6    7  
 
Other postretirement obligations. Certain retired employees receive postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits under plans sponsored by the Company, which has the right to modify or terminate these plans at any time. The cost for coverage is shared between the Company and the retiree. The cost of providing retiree health care and life insurance benefits is actuarially determined and accrued over the service period of the active employee group. The Company’s policy is to fund benefits as claims and premiums are paid. The US plan was closed to new participants effective January 1, 2006.


99111


The following tables set forth the benefit obligations, the fair value of the plan assets and the funded status of the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans; and the amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements:
 
                                
 Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
  Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
 as of December 31, as of December 31,  As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2009 2008 2009 2008  2010 2009 2010 2009
   (In $ millions)    (In $ millions)
Change in projected benefit obligation                                
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period  3,073   3,264   275   306    3,342    3,073    281    275 
Service cost  29   31   1   2    30    29    1    1 
Interest cost  193   195   17   17    188    193    15    17 
Participant contributions  -   -   25   22    -    -    22    25 
Plan amendments  5   -   -   2    -    5    -    - 
Actuarial (gain) loss(1)
  230   (107)   12   (14)    210    230    11    12 
Special termination benefits  -   -   -   - 
Divestitures  (3)   -   -   -    -    (3   -    - 
Settlements  (1)   (19)   -   -    -    (1   -    - 
Benefits paid  (222)   (222)   (59)   (58)    (227   (222   (56   (59
Federal subsidy on Medicare Part D  -   -   6   6    -    -    7    6 
Curtailments  (2)   (1)   -   (2)    (3   (2   -    - 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes  40   (68)   4   (6) 
Other  -   -   -   - 
Exchange rate changes   (7   40    1    4 
                 
Projected benefit obligation at end of period  3,342   3,073   281   275    3,533    3,342    282    281 
                 
Change in plan assets                                
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period  2,170   2,875   -   -    2,329    2,170    -    - 
Actual return on plan assets  306   (448)   -   -    308    306    -    - 
Employer contributions  44   48   34   35    52    44    34    34 
Participant contributions  -   -   25   23    -    -    22    25 
Divestitures  (2)   -   -   -    -    (2   -    - 
Settlements  (3)   (22)   -   -    -    (3   -    - 
Benefits paid  (222)   (222)   (59)   (58)    (227   (222   (56   (59
Foreign currency exchange rate changes  36   (61)   -   - 
Other  -   -   -   - 
Exchange rate changes   (2   36    -    - 
                 
Fair value of plan assets at end of period  2,329   2,170   -   -    2,460    2,329    -    - 
                 
Funded status and net amounts recognized                                
Plan assets less than benefit obligation  (1,013)   (903)   (281)   (275)    (1,073   (1,013   (282   (281
Unrecognized prior service cost  6   1   1   1    5    6    1    1 
Unrecognized actuarial (gain) loss  630   502   (63)   (80)    720    630    (50   (63
                 
Net amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets  (377)   (400)   (343)   (354)    (348   (377   (331   (343
                 
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:                
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of                
Noncurrent Other assets  5   8   -   -    18    5    -    - 
Current Other liabilities  (22)   (22)   (27)   (35)    (22   (22   (27   (27
Pension obligations  (996)   (889)   (254)   (240)    (1,069   (996   (255   (254
                 
Accrued benefit liability  (1,013)   (903)   (281)   (275)    (1,073   (1,013   (282   (281
                 
Net actuarial (gain) loss  630   502   (63)   (80)    720    630    (50   (63
Prior service (benefit) cost  6   1   1   1    5    6    1    1 
                 
Other comprehensive (income) loss(2)
  636   503   (62)   (79)    725    636    (49   (62
                 
Net amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets       (377)        (400)        (343)        (354) 
Net amount recognized in the consolidated balance                
sheets   (348   (377   (331   (343
                 
 
 
(1)Primarily relates to change in discount rates.


100


(2)Amount shown net of tax of $54$93 million and $1$54 million as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively, in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss). See Note 1716 for the related tax associated with the pension and postretirement benefit obligations.


112


 
The percentage of US and international projected benefit obligation at the end of the period is as follows:
 
                                
 Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
 Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
 
 as of December 31, as of December 31, As of December 31, As of December 31, 
 2009 2008 2009 2008 2010 2009 2010 2009 
   (In percentages)   (In percentages) 
US plans  85%  86%  90%  91%   85     85     89     90 
International plans  15%  14%  10%  9%   15     15     11     10 
                 
Total      100%      100%      100%      100%   100     100     100     100 
                 
 
The percentage of US and international fair value of plan assets at the end of the period is as follows:
 
                
 Pension Benefits
  Pension Benefits
 
 as of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
 (In percentages)  (In percentages) 
US plans  83%   84%    82     83 
International plans  17%   16%    18     17 
          
Total      100%       100%    100     100 
          
 
A summary of pensionPension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets is shown below:are as follows:
 
                
 As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2009 2008 2010 2009
 (In $ millions) (In $ millions)
Projected benefit obligation  3,280   2,924    3,320     3,280 
Fair value of plan assets  2,262   2,014    2,228     2,262 
 
Included in the above table are pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets as detailed below:follows:
 
                
 As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2009 2008 2010 2009
 (In $ millions) (In $ millions)
Accumulated benefit obligation  3,169   2,797    3,216     3,169 
Fair value of plan assets  2,249   1,985    2,215     2,249 
 
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $3,218 million and $2,967 millionis as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.follows:
       
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Accumulated benefit obligation   3,436    3,218


101113


The following table sets forth the Company’s netNet periodic pension cost:benefit cost is as follows:
 
                        
 Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
                         
 Year Ended
 Year Ended
  Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
 December 31, December 31,  Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008
     (In $ millions)      (In $ millions)
Service cost  29   31   38   1   1   2    30    29    31    1    1    1 
Interest cost  193   195   187   17   17   19    188    193    195    15    17    17 
Expected return on plan assets  (207)   (218)   (216)   -   -   -    (197   (207   (218   -    -    - 
Amortization of prior service cost  -   -   -   -   -   -    1    -    -    -    -    - 
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss  1   1   1   (5)   (4)   (2)    8    1    1    (4   (5   (4)
Curtailment (gain) loss  (1)   (2)   (1)   -   -   (1)    (4   (1   (2   -    -    - 
Settlement (gain) loss  -   3   (12)   -   -   -    -    -    3    -    -    - 
Special termination benefits  2   -   -   -   -   -    -    2    -    -    -    - 
                         
Net periodic benefit cost        17         10         (3)         13         14         18 
Total   26    17    10    12    13    14 
                         
 
Amortization of the actuarial (gain) lossAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net into net periodic benefit cost in 20102011 is expected to be $8 million and $(4) million for pension benefits and postretirement benefits, respectively.as follows:
         
  Pension
  Postretirement
 
  Benefits  Benefits 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Net actuarial (gain) loss   29     (3)
Prior service cost   1     - 
         
Total   30     (3)
         
 
Included in theThe Company maintains two nonqualified pension obligations above are accrued liabilities relating to supplemental retirement plans funded with nonqualified trusts for certain US employees amounting to $235 million and $224 millionincluded in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Pension expensefollows:
       
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Marketable securities, at fair value   77    82
Noncurrent Other assets, consisting of insurance contracts   70    66
Current Other liabilities   20    19
Benefit obligations   223    216
Expense relating to thesethe nonqualified pension plans included in net periodic benefit cost, totaled $15 million, $15 million and $14 million forexcluding returns on the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. To fund these obligations, nonqualified trusts were established which hold marketable securities valued at $82 million and $97 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition to holding marketable securities,assets held by the nonqualified pension trusts, hold investments in insurance contracts of $66 million and $67 millionis as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which are included in noncurrent Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.follows:
          
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Total   16    15    15
 
Valuation
 
The Company uses the corridor approach in the valuation of its defined benefit plans and other postretirement benefits. The corridor approach defers all actuarial gains and losses resulting from variances between actual results and economic estimates or actuarial assumptions. For defined benefit pension plans, these unrecognized gains and losses are amortized when the net gains and losses exceed 10% of the greater of the market-related value of plan assets or the projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the year. For other postretirement benefits,


114


amortization occurs when the net gains and losses exceed 10% of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at the beginning of the year. The amount in excess of the corridor is amortized over the average remaining service period to retirement date for active plan participants or, for retired participants, the average remaining life expectancy.
 
The following table set forth the principal weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:obligation are as follows:
 
                                
 Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
 Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
 
 as of December 31, as of December 31, As of December 31, As of December 31, 
 2009 2008 2009 2008 2010 2009 2010 2009 
   (In percentages)   (In percentages) 
Discount rate obligations:            
Discount rate obligations                
US plans  5.90   6.50   5.50   6.40   5.30   5.90   4.90   5.50 
International plans  5.41   5.84   5.49   6.11   5.05   5.41   4.95   5.49 
Combined  5.83   6.41   5.50   6.37   5.26   5.83   4.91   5.50 
Rate of compensation increase:            
Rate of compensation increase                
US plans  4.00   4.00   N/A   N/A   4.00   4.00         
International plans  2.94   3.24   N/A   N/A   2.66   2.94         
Combined  3.84   3.90   N/A   N/A   3.58   3.84         


102


The following table set forth the principal weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit cost:cost are as follows:
 
                                                
 Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
 Pension Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
 
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, 
 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 
 (In percentages) (In percentages) 
Discount rate obligations:                  
Discount rate obligations                        
US plans  6.50   6.30   5.88   6.40   6.00   5.88   5.90   6.50   6.30   5.50   6.40   6.00 
International plans  5.84   5.42   4.70   6.11   5.31   4.80   5.41   5.84   5.42   5.49   6.11   5.31 
Combined  6.41   6.16   5.86   6.37   5.93   5.79   5.83   6.41   6.16   5.50   6.37   5.93 
Expected return on plan assets:                  
Expected return on plan assets                        
US plans  8.50   8.50   8.50   N/A   N/A   N/A   8.50   8.50   8.50             
International plans  5.29   5.68   6.59   N/A   N/A   N/A   6.07   5.29   5.68             
Combined  7.94   8.05   8.20   N/A   N/A   N/A   8.06   7.94   8.05             
Rate of compensation increase:                  
Rate of compensation increase                        
US plans  4.00   4.00   4.00   N/A   N/A   N/A   4.00   4.00   4.00             
International plans  3.24   3.15   3.18   N/A   N/A   N/A   2.94   3.24   3.15             
Combined  3.90   3.66   3.73   N/A   N/A   N/A   3.84   3.90   3.66             
 
The expected rate of return is assessed annually and is based on long-term relationships among major asset classes and the level of incremental returns that can be earned by the successful implementation of different active investment management strategies. Equity returns are based on estimates of long-term inflation rate, real rate of return,10-year Treasury bond premium over cash and equity risk premium. Fixed income returns are based on maturity, long-term inflation, real rate of return and credit spreads. The US qualified defined benefit plans’ actual return on assets for the year ended December 31, 20092010 was 18%15% versus an expected long-term rate of asset return assumption of 8.5%.
 
In the US, the rate used to discount pension and other postretirement benefit plan liabilities was based on a yield curve developed from market data of over 300 Aa-grade non-callable bonds at December 31, 2009.2010. This yield curve has discount rates that vary based on the duration of the obligations. The estimated future cash flows for the pension and other benefit obligations were matched to the corresponding rates on the yield curve to derive a weighted average discount rate.


115


The Company determines its discount rates in the Euro zone using the iBoxx Euro Corporate AA Bond indices with appropriate adjustments for the duration of the plan obligations. In other international locations, the Company determines its discount rates based on the yields of high quality government bonds with a duration appropriate to the duration of the plan obligations.
 
On January 1, 2010, the Company’s health care cost trend assumption for US postretirement medical plan’s net periodic benefit cost was 8.5% for the first year declining 0.5% per year to an ultimate rate of 5%. On January 1, 2009, the Company’s health care cost trend assumption for US postretirement medical plan’s net periodic benefit cost was 9% for the first year declining 0.5% per year to an ultimate rate of 5%. On January 1, 2008, the Company’s health care cost trend assumption for US postretirement medical plan’s net periodic benefit cost was 9% for the first two years declining 0.5% per year to an ultimate rate of 5%. On January 1, 2007, the health care cost trend rate was 8.5% per year declining 1% per year to an ultimate rate of 5%.
 
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage-point increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate would impact postretirement obligations by $4 million and $(3)$(4) million, respectively. The effect of a one percent increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have a less than $1 million impact on service and interest cost.
 
Plan Assets
 
The investment objective for the plans are to earn, over moving twenty-year periods, the long-term expected rate of return, net of investment fees and transaction costs, to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plan, while at the same time maintaining sufficient liquidity to pay benefit obligations and proper expenses, and meet any other cash needs, in the short- to medium-term.


103


The following tables set forth the weighted average target asset allocations for the Company’s pension plans:plans are as follows (in percentages):
 
     
Asset Category — US Plans
 20102011 
 
US equity securitiesDomestic bonds53
Domestic equities  26% 
Global equityOverseas equities  20% 
High yield fixed income/otherOther  4%1 
Liability hedging bonds50%
     
Total  100% 
     
 
     
Asset Category — International Plans
 20102011 
 
Equity securitiesDomestic bonds  21%74 
Debt securitiesDomestic equities  73%17 
Real estate and otherOverseas equities  6%5 
Other4
     
Total  100% 
     
 
The equity and debt securities objectives are to provide diversified exposure across the US and Global equity markets and to manage the plan’s risks and returns through the use of multiple managers and strategies. The fixed income portfolio objectives are to hedge a portion of the interest rate risks associated with the plan’s funding target liabilities. The goal of the liability hedging bond is to reduce surplus volatility and provide a liquidity reserve for paying off benefits. The strategy is designed to reduce liability-related interest rate risk by investing in bonds that match the duration and credit quality of the projected plan liabilities. Derivatives based strategies may be used to improve the effectiveness of the hedges. Other types of investments include investments in real estate and insurance contracts that follow several different strategies.contracts.
 
As discussed in Note 3, theThe Company adopted certain provisions of FASB ASC Topic715-20-50,Compensation – Retirement Benefits: Defined Benefit Plans – General: Disclosure(“FASB ASC Topic715-20-50”), on January 1, 2009. FASB ASC Topic715-20-50 requires enhanced disclosures about the plan assets of a company’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans intended to provide financial statement users with a greater understanding of the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets and the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period using the framework established


116


under FASB ASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.820. FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation. Valuations for fund investments such as common/collective trusts and registered investment companies, which do not have readily determinable fair values, are typically estimated using a net asset value provided by a third party as a practical expedient.
The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
 
Level 1 — unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by the Company
 
Level 2 — inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those inputs classified as Level 1
 
Level 3 — inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation
 
The Company’s defined benefit plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and include the following items:
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Foreign and domestic currencies as well as short term securities are valued at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.
 
Common/Collective Trusts: Composed of various funds whose diversified portfolio is comprised of foreign and domestic equities, fixed income securities, and short term investments. Investments are valued at the net asset value of units held by the plan at year-end.


104


Corporate stock and government and corporate debt: Valued at the closing price reported on the active market in which the individual securities are traded. Automated quotes are provided by multiple pricing services and validated by the plan custodian. These securities are traded on exchanges as well as in the over the counter market.
 
Registered Investment Companies: Composed of various mutual funds and other investment companies whose diversified portfolio is comprised of foreign and domestic equities, fixed income securities, and short term investments. Investments are valued at the net asset value of units held by the plan at year-end.
 
Mortgage Backed Securities: Fair value is estimated based on valuations obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or comparable assets. Mortgage Backed Securities are traded in the over the counter broker/dealer market.
 
Derivatives: Derivative financial instruments are valued in the market using discounted cash flow techniques. These techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs such as interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instrument’s term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk. Significant inputs to the derivative valuation for interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards and swaps, and options are observable in the active markets and are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy.
 
Insurance contracts: Valued at contributions made, plus earnings, less participant withdrawals and administrative expenses, which approximates fair value.


117


The following table sets forth the fair values of the Company’s pension plansplan assets are as of December 31, 2009:follows:
                     
  December 31, 2010
    
  Fair Value Measurement Using    
  Quoted Prices in
  Significant Other
  Significant
    
  Active Markets for
  Observable
  Unobservable
    
  Identical Assets
  Inputs
  Inputs
    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Assets                    
Cash and cash equivalents  9    -    -    9  
Collateralized mortgage obligations  -    21    -    21  
Common/collective trusts  -    200    26    226  
Corporate debt  2    778    -    780  
Corporate stock-common & preferred  737    -    -    737  
Derivatives  -    9    -    9  
Government debt                    
Treasuries, other debt  33    236    -    269  
Mortgage backed securities  -    68    -    68  
Real estate  -    9    -    9  
Registered investment companies  -    293    -    293  
Short-term investments  -    58    -    58  
Insurance contracts  -    29    -    29  
Other  7    -    -    7  
                     
Total assets  788    1,701    26    2,515  
                     
Liabilities                    
Derivatives  -    (9)   -    (9) 
                     
Total liabilities  -    (9)   -    (9) 
                     
Total net assets (1)
  788    1,692    26    2,506  
                     
 
                     
  Fair Value Measurement Using    
  Quoted Prices in
     Significant
    
  Active Markets for
  Significant Other
  Unobservable
    
  Identical Assets
  Observable Inputs
  Inputs
    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
     (In $ millions)       
 
Assets
                    
Cash & cash equivalents       2    -         -         2  
Collateralized mortgage obligations       -    16    -    16  
Common/collective trusts  -    210    19    229  
Corporate debt  -    831    -    831  
Corporate stock-common & preferred  522    -    -    522  
Derivatives  14    244    -    258  
Government debt                    
Treasuries, other debt  88    212    -    300  
Mortgage backed securities  -    53    -    53  
Real estate  -    7    -    7  
Registered investment companies  -    298    -    298  
Short-term investments  -    65    -    65  
Other  3    -    -    3  
Insurance contracts  -    28    -    28  
                     
Total assets  629    1,964    19    2,612  
                     
Liabilities
                    
Derivatives  (15)   (268)   -    (283) 
Total liabilities  (15)   (268)   -    (283) 
                     
Total net assets  614    1,696    19    2,329  
                     
(1)Total net assets excludes non-financial plan receivables and payables of $26 million and $72 million, respectively. Non-financial items include due to/from broker, interest receivables and accrued expenses.


118


                     
  December 31, 2009
    
  Fair Value Measurement Using    
  Quoted Prices in
  Significant Other
  Significant
    
  Active Markets for
  Observable
  Unobservable
    
  Identical Assets
  Inputs
  Inputs
    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Assets                    
Cash and cash equivalents  2    -    -    2  
Collateralized mortgage obligations  -    16    -    16  
Common/collective trusts  -    210    19    229  
Corporate debt  -    819    -    819  
Corporate stock-common & preferred  521    -    -    521  
Derivatives  -    258    -    258  
Government debt                    
Treasuries, other debt  88    211    -    299  
Mortgage backed securities  -    53    -    53  
Real estate  -    7    -    7  
Registered investment companies  -    298    -    298  
Short-term investments  -    64    -    64  
Other  6    -    -    6  
Insurance contracts  -    28    -    28  
                     
Total assets  617    1,964    19    2,600  
                     
Liabilities                    
Derivatives  -    (283)   -    (283) 
                     
Total liabilities  -    (283)   -    (283) 
                     
Total net assets (1)
  617    1,681    19    2,317  
                     
(1)Total net assets excludes non-financial plan receivables and payables of $129 million and $117 million, respectively. Non-financial items include due to/from broker, interest receivables and accrued expenses.
 
The Company’s Level 3 investment in common/collective trusts was valued using significant unobservable inputs. Inputs to this valuation include characteristics and quantitative data relating to the asset, investment cost, position


105


size, liquidity, current financial condition of the company and other relevant market data. The following table sets forthLevel 3 fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs:inputs are as follows:
 
Common/Collective Trust
(In $ millions)
Balance, beginning of period     7
Unrealized gains (losses)10
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net2
Balance, end of period          19
         
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
As of the beginning of the year  19   7 
Unrealized gains (losses)  8   10 
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net  (1)  2 
         
As of the end of the year   26    19 
         
 
The financial objectives of the qualified pension plans are established in conjunction with a comprehensive review of each plan’s liability structure. The Company’s asset allocation policy is based on detailed asset/liability analyses. In developing investment policy and financial goals, consideration is given to each plan’s demographics, the returns and risks associated with current and alternative investment strategies and the current and projected cash, expense and funding ratios of each plan. Investment policies must also comply with local statutory requirements as determined by each country. A formal asset/liability study of each plan is undertaken every 3 to 5 years or whenever there has been a material change in plan demographics, benefit structure or funding status and investment market.

119


The Company has adopted a long-term investment horizon such that the risk and duration of investment losses are weighed against the long-term potential for appreciation of assets. Although there cannot be complete assurance that these objectives will be realized, it is believed that the likelihood for their realization is reasonably high, based upon the asset allocation chosen and the historical and expected performance of the asset classes utilized by the plans. The intent is for investments to be broadly diversified across asset classes, investment styles, market sectors, investment managers, developed and emerging markets and securities in order to moderate portfolio volatility and risk. Investments may be in separate accounts, commingled trusts, mutual funds and other pooled asset portfolios provided they all conform to fiduciary standards.
 
External investment managers are hired to manage pension assets. Investment consultants assist with the screening process for each new manager hired. Over the long-term, the investment portfolio is expected to earn returns that exceed a composite of market indices that are weighted to match each plan’s target asset allocation. The portfolio return should also (over the long-term) meet or exceed the return used for actuarial calculations in order to meet the future needs of each plan.
 
Employer contributions for pension benefits and postretirement benefits are preliminarily estimated to be $46$178 million and $27 million, respectively, in 2010.2011. The table below reflects pension benefits expected to be paid from the planplans or from the Company’s assets. The postretirement benefits represent the Company’s share of the benefit cost.
 
                        
   Postretirement
    Postretirement
 
   Benefit    Benefit 
 Pension
   Expected
  Pension
   Expected
 
 Benefit
   Federal
  Benefit
   Federal
 
 Payments(1) Payments Subsidy  Payments(1) Payments Subsidy 
   (In $ millions)    (In $ millions) 
2010  224   61   7 
2011  222   63   7   232   57   7 
2012  221   64   7   230   57   7 
2013  223   65   8   228   58   7 
2014  224   66   3   227   59   3 
2015-2019  1,187   332   13 
2015  226   60   3 
2016-2020  1,165   290   12 
 
(1)Payments are expected to be made primarily from plan assets.


106


 
Other Obligations
The following table represents additional
Additional benefit liabilities and other similar obligations:obligations are as follows:
 
                
 As of December 31,  As of December 31,
 2009 2008       2010           2009     
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Long-term disability       30        33   27   30 
Other  8   5   8   8 
     
Total  38   38 
     
 
16. Environmental
15. Environmental
 
General
 
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations worldwide which impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and establish standards for the treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations. The Company is also subject to retained environmental obligations specified in various contractual agreements arising from the divestiture of certain businesses by the Company or one of its predecessor companies.


120


For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s expenditures,Expenditures, including expenditures for legal compliance, internal environmental initiatives, and remediation of active, orphan, divested, demerger and US Superfund sites (as defined below) were $78 million, $78 million, and $83 million, respectively. The Company’s capital project-related environmental expenditures forprojects are as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Environmental expenditures         66           78           78  
Capital project-related environmental expenditures  19    22    13  
Environmental remediation reserves are recorded in the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $22 million, $13 million, and $14 million, respectively. consolidated balance sheets as follows:
         
  As of December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Current Other liabilities  16    13  
Noncurrent Other liabilities  85    93  
         
Total  101    106  
         
Environmental remediation reserves for remediation matters were $106 million and $98 millionrecorded in the consolidated balance sheets are categorized as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which represents the Company’s best estimate of its liability.follows:
         
  As of December 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Demerger obligations (Note 23)  36    36  
Divestiture obligations (Note 23)  26    28  
US Superfund sites  13    10  
Other environmental remediation reserves  26    32  
         
Total  101    106  
         
 
Remediation
 
Due to its industrial history and through retained contractual and legal obligations, the Company has the obligation to remediate specific areas on its own sites as well as on divested, orphandemerger or US Superfund sites.sites (as defined below). In addition, as part of the demerger agreement between the Company and Hoechst AG (“Hoechst”), a specified portion of the responsibility for environmental liabilities from a number of Hoechst divestitures was transferred to the Company.Company (Note 23). The Company provides for such obligations when the event of loss is probable and reasonably estimable.
 
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the total remediationRemediation efforts charged to Cost of salesrecorded in the consolidated statements of operations were $9 million, $3 million and $4 million, respectively. are as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Cost of sales  1   9   3 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  8   6   1 
The Company believes that environmental remediation costs will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company, but may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or cash flows in any given accounting period.
 
The Company did not record any insurance recoveries related to these matters for the reported periods and there are no receivables for insurance recoveries as of December 31, 2009.2010. As of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, there were


121


receivables of $9$7 million and $9 million, respectively, from the former owner APL,of the Company’s cellulose Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom acetate flake, tow and film business, which was acquired in 2007, (see Note 4).and is included in the Company’s Consumer Specialties segment.
 
German InfraServs
 
On January 1, 1997, coinciding with a reorganization of the Hoechst businesses in Germany, real estate service companies (“InfraServs”) were created to own directly the land and property and to provide various technical and administrative services at each of the manufacturing locations. The Company hasholds an interest in manufacturing operations at the InfraServ location in Frankfurt am Main-Hoechst, Germany and holds interests in the companies which own and operate the former Hoechst sites in Gendorf, Knapsack and Wiesbaden.


107


InfraServs are liable for any residual contamination and other pollution because they own the real estate on which the individual facilities operate. In addition, Hoechst, and its legal successors, as the responsible party under German public law, is liable to third parties for all environmental damage that occurred while it was still the owner of the plants and real estate. The contribution agreements entered into in 1997 between Hoechst and the respective operating companies, as part of the divestiture of these companies, provide that the operating companies will indemnify Hoechst, and its legal successors, against environmental liabilities resulting from the transferred businesses. Additionally, the InfraServs have agreed to indemnify Hoechst, and its legal successors, against any environmental liability arising out of or in connection with environmental pollution of any site. Likewise, in certain circumstances the Company could be responsible for the elimination of residual contamination on a few sites that were not transferred to InfraServ companies, in which case Hoechst, and its legal successors, must reimburse the Company for two-thirds of any costs so incurred.
 
The InfraServ partnership agreements provide that, as between the partners, each partner is responsible for any contamination caused predominantly by such partner. Any liability, which cannot be attributed to an InfraServ partner and for which no third party is responsible, is required to be borne by the InfraServ partnership. In view of this potential obligation to eliminate residual contamination, the InfraServs, primarily relating to equity and cost affiliatesinvestments which are not consolidated by the Company, have reserves of $94 million and $84 million as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008, respectively.2009.
 
If an InfraServ partner defaults on its respective indemnification obligations to eliminate residual contamination, the owners of the remaining participation in the InfraServ companies have agreed to fund such liabilities, subject to a number of limitations. To the extent that any liabilities are not satisfied by either the InfraServs or their owners, these liabilities are to be borne by the Company in accordance with the demerger agreement. However, Hoechst, and its legal successors, will reimburse the Company for two-thirds of any such costs. Likewise, in certain circumstances the Company could be responsible for the elimination of residual contamination on several sites that were not transferred to InfraServ companies, in which case Hoechst, and its legal successors, must also reimburse the Company for two-thirds of any costs so incurred. The German InfraServs are owned partially by the Company, as noted below, and the remaining ownership is held by various other companies. The Company’s ownership interest and environmental liability participation percentages for such liabilities which cannot be attributed to an InfraServ partner were as follows as of December 31, 2009:2010:
 
                
Company   Ownership %     Liability %  
 Ownership % Liability % 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Gendorf KG  39%  10%  39   10 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Knapsack KG  27%  22%  27   22 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Hoechst KG  32%  40%  32   40 
InfraServ GmbH & Co. Wiesbaden KG  8%  0%  8   - 
InfraServ Verwaltungs GmbH  100%  0%  100   - 


122


US Superfund Sites
 
In the US, the Company may be subject to substantial claims brought by US federal or state regulatory agencies or private individuals pursuant to statutory authority or common law. In particular, the Company has a potential liability under the US Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, and related state laws (collectively referred to as “Superfund”) for investigation and cleanup costs at approximately 5036 sites. At most of these sites, numerous companies, including certain companies comprising the Company, or one of its predecessor companies, have been notified that the Environmental Protection Agency, state governing bodies or private individuals consider such companies to be potentially responsible parties (“PRP”) under Superfund or related laws. The proceedings relating to these sites are in various stages. The cleanup process has not been completed at most sites and the status of the insurance coverage for most of these proceedings is uncertain. Consequently, the Company cannot accurately determine its ultimate liability for investigation or cleanup costs at these sites.
 
As events progress at each site for which it has been named a PRP, the Company accrues, as appropriate, a liability for site cleanup. Such liabilities include all costs that are probable and can be reasonably estimated. In establishing these liabilities, the Company considers its shipment of waste to a site, its percentage of total waste shipped to the


108


site, the types of wastes involved, the conclusions of any studies, the magnitude of any remedial actions that may be necessary and the number and viability of other PRPs. Often the Company will join with other PRPs to sign joint defense agreements that will settle, among PRPs, each party’s percentage allocation of costs at the site. Although the ultimate liability may differ from the estimate, the Company routinely reviews the liabilities and revises the estimate, as appropriate, based on the most current information available. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had provisions totaling $10 million and $11 million, respectively, for
US Superfund sites andsite reserves were utilized $1 million, $2 million and $1 million of these reserves during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Total  2   1   2 
Additional provisions and adjustments recorded during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 approximately offset these expenditures.
 
Hoechst Liabilities16. Shareholders’ Equity
In connection with the Hoechst demerger, the Company agreed to indemnify Hoechst, and its legal successors, for the first €250 million of future remediation liabilities for environmental damages arising from 19 specified divested Hoechst entities. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, reserves of $32 million and $27 million, respectively, for these matters are included as a component of the total environmental reserves. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company, has made total cumulative payments of $51 million and $48 million, respectively. If such future liabilities exceed €250 million, Hoechst, and its legal successors, will bear such excess up to an additional €500 million. Thereafter, the Company will bear one-third and Hoechst, and its legal successors, will bear two-thirds of any further environmental remediation liabilities. Where the Company is unable to reasonably determine the probability of loss or estimate such loss under this indemnification, the Company has not recognized any liabilities relative to this indemnification.
17. Shareholders’ Equity
 
Preferred Stock
The
On February 1, 2010, the Company has $240delivered notice to the holders of its 4.25% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) that it was calling for the redemption of all 9.6 million aggregate liquidation preferenceoutstanding shares of outstanding 4.25% convertible perpetual preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”).Stock. Holders of the Preferred Stock arewere entitled to receive, when, as and if, declared byconvert each share of Preferred Stock into 1.2600 shares of the Company’s Board of Directors, out of funds legally available, cash dividends at the rate of 4.25%Series A common stock, par value $0.0001 per annum of liquidation preference, payable quarterly in arrears, commencing on May 1, 2005. Dividends on the Preferred Stock are cumulative from the date of initial issuance. Accumulated but unpaid dividends accumulate at an annual rate of 4.25%. The Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder,share, at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February 19, 2010. As of such date, holders of Preferred Stock had elected to convert 9,591,276 shares of Preferred Stock into approximately 1.26an aggregate of 12,084,942 shares of Series A common stock. The 8,724 shares of Preferred Stock that remained outstanding after such conversions were redeemed by the Company on February 22, 2010 for 7,437 shares of Series A common stock, subjectin accordance with the terms of the Preferred Stock. In addition to adjustments, per $25.00 liquidation preferencethe shares of Series A common stock issued in respect of the shares of Preferred Stock converted and upon conversion will beredeemed, the Company paid cash in lieu of fractional shares. The Company recorded expense of less than $1 million to Additional paid-in capital in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss). On February 1, for the year ended December 31, 2010 related to the Company announced its intention to redeem its Preferred Stock (Note 31).
During 2009, 2008conversion and 2007,redemption of the Company declared and paid $10 million of cash dividends in each period on its Preferred Stock.
 
DividendsCommon Stock
 
The Company’s Board of Directors follows a policy of declaring, subject to legally available funds, a quarterly cash dividend on each share of the Company’s Series A common stock at an annual rate of $0.16 per share unless the Company’s Board of Directors, in its


123


sole discretion, determines otherwise. Further, such dividends payable to holders of the Company’s Series A common stock cannot be declared or paid nor can any funds be set aside for the payment thereof, unless the Company has paid or set aside funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock. As discussed above, all Preferred Stock was redeemed by the Company in February 2010 and no preferred stock or accumulated dividends remained outstanding as described above. Additionally, theof December, 31, 2010. The amount available to pay cash dividends is restricted by the Company’s senior credit agreement.agreement and the Notes.
 
During 2009, 2008 and 2007,In April 2010, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a 25% increase in the Company’s quarterly Series A common stock cash dividend. The Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend rate from $0.04 to $0.05 per share of Series A common stock on a quarterly basis. The new dividend rate was applicable to dividends payable beginning in August 2010.
The Company declared and paid cash dividends of $23 million, $24 million and $25 million, respectively, to holders of its Series A common stock.stock as follows:


109


             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Total   28    23    24 

Treasury Stock
In conjunction with the April 2007 debt refinancing (Note 14), the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Celanese International Holdings Luxembourg S.à.r.l. (“CIH”), formerly Celanese Caylux Holdings Luxembourg S.C.A., repurchased 2,021,775 shares of its outstanding Series A common stock in a modified “Dutch Auction” tender offer from public shareholders, which expired on April 3, 2007, at a purchase price of $30.50 per share. The total price paid for these shares was $62 million. The Company also separately purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary CIH, 329,011 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock at $30.50 per share from the investment funds associated with The Blackstone Group L.P. The total price paid for these shares was $10 million.
In June 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $330 million of its Series A common stock. During 2007, the Company repurchased 8,487,700 shares of its Series A common stock at an average purchase price of $38.88 per share for a total of $330 million pursuant to this authorization. The Company completed repurchasing shares related to this authorization during July 2007.
 
In February 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $400 million of the Company’s Series A common stock. This authorization was increased to $500 million in October 2008. The authorization gives management discretion in determining the conditions under which shares may be repurchased.
During The number of shares repurchased and the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company repurchased 9,763,200 shares of its Series A common stock at an average purchase price of $38.68paid per share for a total of $378 million pursuant to this authorization.authorization are as follows:
                 
        Total From
  Year Ended December 31, Inception Through
  2010 2009 2008 December 31, 2010
 
Shares repurchased   1,667,592    -    9,763,200    11,430,792 
Average purchase price per share $28.77  $          -  $38.68  $37.24 
Amount spent on repurchased                
shares (in millions) $48  $-  $378  $426 
 
These purchases reducedThe purchase of treasury stock reduces the number of shares outstanding and the repurchased shares may be used by the Company for compensation programs utilizing the Company’s stock and other corporate purposes. The Company accounts for treasury stock using the cost method.method and includes treasury stock as a component of Shareholders’ equity.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net, which is displayed in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity, represents net earnings (loss) plus the results of certain shareholders’ equity changes not reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. Such items include unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, foreign currency translation, certain pension and postretirement benefit obligations and unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps.


124


The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net are as follows:
 
                                        
         Accumulated
          Accumulated
 Unrealized
   Unrealized
   Other
  Unrealized
   Unrealized
 Pension and
 Other
 Gain (Loss) on
 Foreign
 Gain (Loss)
 Pension and
 Comprehensive
  Gain (Loss) on
 Foreign
 Gain (Loss)
 Postretire-
 Comprehensive
 Marketable
 Currency
 on Interest
 Postretirement
 Income
  Marketable
 Currency
 on Interest
 ment
 Income
 Securities Translation Rate Swaps Benefits (Loss), Net  Securities Translation Rate Swaps Benefits (Loss), Net
 (In $ millions)        As Adjusted (Note 4)
 (In $ millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2006  9   17   4   1   31 
Current-period change  17   70   (41)   124   170 
Tax benefit (expense)  -   -   -   (4)   (4) 
           
Balance as of December 31, 2007  26   87   (37)   121   197   26   87   (37)  120   196 
Current-period change  (23) (1)  (130)   (79)   (549)   (781) 
Current period change   (23(1)  (130)  (79)  (549)  (781)
Tax benefit (expense)  -   -   -   5   5   -   -   -   5   5 
                     
Balance as of December 31, 2008  3   (43)   (116)   (423)   (579)   3   (43)  (116)  (424)  (580)
Current-period change  (5)   10   23   (150)   (122) 
Current period change  (5  10   23   (150)  (122)
Tax benefit (expense)  2   (5)   (8)   53   42   2   (5)  (8)  53   42 
                     
Balance as of December 31, 2009  -   (38)   (101)   (520)   (659)   -   (38)  (101)  (521)  (660)
Current period change  -   26   32   (102)  (44)
Tax benefit (expense)  (1  11   (15)  39   34 
                     
Balance as of December 31, 2010  (1  (1)  (84)  (584)  (670)
          
 
(1) Includes a net reclassification adjustment of ($2) million to the consolidated statements of operations.
17. Other (Charges) Gains, Net
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Employee termination benefits  (32)  (105)  (21)
Plant/office closures  (4)  (17)  (7)
Asset impairments  (74)  (14)  (115)
Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation (Note 28)  (26)  (16)  (12)
Insurance recoveries, net (Note 29)  18   6   38 
Resolution of commercial disputes  13   -   - 
Plumbing actions (Note 23)  59   10   - 
Sorbates antitrust actions  -   -   8 
Other  -   -   1 
             
Total    (46   (136   (108
             
2010
In March 2010, the Company concluded that certain long-lived assets were partially impaired at its acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations in Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom (Note 4). Accordingly, the Company wrote down the related property, plant and equipment to its fair value of $31 million, resulting in long-lived asset impairment losses of $72 million during the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company calculated the fair value for the reporting unit using a discounted cash flow model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved which is classified as a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model included discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates, growth rates and cash flow projections are the most sensitive and susceptible to change as they require significant management judgment.


110125


As a result of the announced closure of the Company’s acetate flake and tow manufacturing operations in Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom (Note 4), the Company recorded $15 million of employee termination benefits during the year ended December 31, 2010. The Spondon, Derby, United Kingdom facility is included in the Consumer Specialties segment.
18. Other (Charges) Gains, Net
 
As a result of the Company’s Pardies, France “Project of Closure” (Note 4), the Company recorded exit costs of $12 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, which consisted of $6 million in employee termination benefits, $1 million of long-lived asset impairment losses, $2 million of contract termination costs and other plant closure costs and $3 million of reindustrialization costs. The components of Other (charges) gains, net are as follows:Pardies, France facility is included in the Acetyl Intermediates segment.
 
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Employee termination benefits  (105)         (21)         (32)
Plant/office closures  (17)  (7)  (11)
Deferred compensation triggered by Exit Event (Note 20)  -   -   (74)
Plumbing actions  10   -   4 
Insurance recoveries associated with Clear Lake, Texas (Note 30)  6   38   40 
Resolution of commercial disputes with a vendor  -   -   31 
Asset impairments  (14)  (115)  (9)
Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation (Note 29)  (16)  (12)  (5)
Sorbates antitrust actions (Note 24)  -   8   - 
Other  -   1   (2)
             
Total  (136)  (108)  (58)
             
As a result of several business optimization projects undertaken by the Company beginning in 2009 and continuing throughout 2010, the Company recorded $11 million in employee termination costs during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Other charges for the year ended December 31, 2010 also included gains of $13 million, net, related to settlements in resolution of a commercial disputes. The settlements were recorded in the Company’s Consumer Specialties segment.
 
2009
 
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company began efforts to align production capacity and staffing levels with the Company’s view of an economic environment of prolonged lower demand. For the year ended December 31, 2009, Other charges included employee termination benefits of $40 million related to this endeavor. As a result of the shutdown of the vinyl acetate monomer (“VAM”) production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico, the Company recognized employee termination benefits of $1 million and long-lived asset impairment losses of $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2009. The VAM production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico is included in the Company’s Acetyl Intermediates segment.
 
As a result of the Project“Project of ClosureClosure” (Note 4), Other charges for the Company included exit costs of $89 million during the year ended December 31, 2009, which consisted of $60 million in employee termination benefits, $17 million of contract termination costs and $12 million of long-lived asset impairment losses related to capitalized costs associated with asset retirement obligations (Note 13)12). The Pardies, France facility is included in the Acetyl Intermediates segment.
 
Due to continued declines in demand in automotive and electronic sectors during 2009, the Company announced plans to reduce capacity by ceasing polyester polymer production at its Ticona manufacturing plant in Shelby, North Carolina. Other charges for the year ended December 31, 2009 included employee termination benefits of $2 million and long-lived asset impairment losses of $1 million related to this event. The Shelby, North Carolina facility is included in the Advanced Engineered Materials segment.
 
Other charges for the year ended December 31, 2009 was partially offset by $6 million of insurance recoveries in satisfaction of claims the Company made related to the unplanned outage of the Company’s Clear Lake, Texas acetic acid facility during 2007, a $9 million decrease in legal reserves for plumbing claims due to the Company’s ongoing assessment of the likely outcome of the plumbing actions and the expiration of the statute of limitation.
 
2008
 
Other (charges) gains, net for asset impairments includes long-lived asset impairment losses of $92 million related to the potential closure of the Company’s acetic acid and VAM production facility in Pardies, France, the VAM production unit in Cangrejera, Mexico (which the Company subsequently decided to shut down effective at the end of February 2009) and certain other facilities. Of the $92 million recorded in December 2008, $76 million relates to the Acetyl Intermediates segment and $16 million relates to the Advanced Engineered Materials segment. Consideration of this potential capacity reduction was necessitated by the significant change in the global economic environment and anticipated lower customer demand.


111126


Additionally, the Company recognized $23 million of long-lived asset impairment losses related to the shutdown of the Company’s Pampa, Texas facility (Acetyl Intermediates segment).
 
Other (charges) gains, net for employee termination benefits includes severance and retention charges of $13 million related to the sale of the Company’s Pampa, Texas facility and $8 million of severance and retention charges related to other business optimization plans undertaken by the Company.
 
2007
Other (charges) gains, net for employee termination benefits and plant/office closures include charges related to the Company’s plan to simplify and optimize its Emulsions and PVOH businesses (Industrial Specialties segment) to become a leader in technology and innovation and grow in both new and existing markets. Other (charges) gains, net for employee termination benefits and plant/office closures also includes charges related to the sale of the Company’s Pampa, Texas facility. In addition, the Company recorded an impairment of long-lived assets of $3 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.
In December 2007, the Company received a one-time payment in resolution of commercial disputes with a vendor.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, asset impairments included $6 million of goodwill impairment related to the PVOH business.
The changes in the restructuring reserves by business segment are as follows:
 
                                                
 Advanced
            Advanced
          
 Engineered
 Consumer
 Industrial
 Acetyl
      Engineered
 Consumer
 Industrial
 Acetyl
    
 Materials Specialties Specialties Intermediates Other Total  Materials Specialties Specialties Intermediates Other Total
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Employee Termination Benefits                                                
Reserve as of December 31, 2007            2             5             12             16        2        37 
Additions  1   2   1   13   4   21 
Cash payments  (1)  (5)  (6)  (12)  (3)  (27)
Currency translation adjustment  -   -   (1)  -   (1)  (2)
             
Reserve as of December 31, 2008  2   2   6   17   2   29   2   2   6   17   2   29 
Additions  12   9   6   66   12   105   12   9   6   66   12   105 
Cash payments  (8)  (7)  (9)  (23)  (7)  (54)   (8   (7   (9   (23       (7       (54
Currency translation adjustment  1   -   -   -   -   1 
Exchange rate changes  1   -   -   -   -   1 
                         
Reserve as of December 31, 2009  7   4   3   60   7   81   7   4   3   60   7   81 
Additions  2   17   -   6   7   32 
Cash payments  (6)  (3)  (3)  (37)  (4)  (53)
Other changes  -   (1)  -   -   -   (1)
Exchange rate changes  -   (1)  -   (5)  -   (6)
            
Reserve as of December 31, 2010  3   16   -   24   10   53 
                         
Plant/Office Closures                                                
Reserve as of December 31, 2007  1   3   1   2   1   8 
Additions  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Cash payments  (1)  -   (1)  (2)  -   (4)
Currency translation adjustment  -   (1)  -   -   -   (1)
             
Reserve as of December 31, 2008  -   2   -   -   1   3   -   2   -   -   1   3 
Additions  -   -   -   17   -   17   -   -   -   17   -   17 
Transfers  -   (2)  -   -   -   (2)  -   (2)  -   -   -   (2)
Cash payments  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                         
Reserve as of December 31, 2009  -   -   -   17   1   18   -   -   -   17   1   18 
Additions  -   -   -   6   -   6 
Cash payments  -   -   -   (18)  -   (18)
Exchange rate changes  -   -   -   (2)  -   (2)
            
Reserve as of December 31, 2010  -   -   -   3   1   4 
                         
Total  7   4   3   77   8   99   3   16   -   27   11   57 
                         


112


19. Income Taxes
18. Income Taxes
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax by jurisdiction are as follows:
 
                        
 Year Ended
  Year Ended December 31,
 December 31,  2010 2009 2008
 2009 2008 2007    As Adjusted (Note 4)
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
US    294     135     (111)  214   294   135 
International  (53)  299   558   324   (43)  298 
             
Total  241   434   447    538    251    433 
             


127


The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following:
 
            
 Year Ended
             
 December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Current                        
US    11     62     (9)  62   11   62 
International  148   92   163   35   148   92 
             
Total  159   154   154   97   159   154 
Deferred                        
US  (404)  (37)  17   16   (404)  (37)
International  2   (54)  (61)  (1)  2   (54)
             
Total  (402)  (91)  (44)  15   (402)  (91)
             
Income tax provision (benefit)  (243)  63   110    112    (243   63 
             
 
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the consolidated deferred tax assets and liabilities wereare as follows:
 
        
 As of
         
 December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions) 
Deferred tax assets                
Pension and postretirement obligations       361        304        356        361 
Accrued expenses  195   195   233   195 
Inventory  10   8   10   10 
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards  375   279   422   375 
Other  220   192   193   220 
          
Subtotal  1,161   978   1,214   1,161 
Valuation allowance  (334)  (652(1)  (385)  (334(1)
          
Total  827   326   829   827 
          
Deferred tax liabilities                
Depreciation and amortization  336   322   323   336 
Investments  45   41   47   45 
Other  90   49   68   90 
          
Total  471   412   438   471 
          
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)  356   (86)  391   356 
          


113


(1)Includes deferred tax asset valuation allowances primarily for the Company’s deferred tax assets in the US, Luxembourg, France, Spain, China, the United Kingdom and Germany, as well as other foreign jurisdictions. These valuation allowances relate primarily to net operating loss carryforward benefits and other net deferred tax assets, all of which may not be realizable.
 
Since 2004, theThe Company has maintained a valuation allowance against its US net deferred tax assets. FASB ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes, requires the Company to continually assess all available positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will be realized.since 2004. During 2009, the Company concluded that, due to cumulative profitability, it is more likely than not that it will realize its net US deferred tax assets with the exception of certain state net operating loss carryforwards. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a deferred tax benefit of $492 million for the release of thebeginning-of-the-year US valuation allowance associated with those US net deferred tax assets expected to be realized in 2009 and subsequent years.


128


For the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, the valuation allowance decreasedincreased by $318$51 million consisting of: (1)(a) income tax benefits,expense, net, of $314$39 million, (2) an increase(b) a decrease of $1 million allocated to Accumulated other comprehensive income, (3) an increase of $11$13 million related to foreign currency translation adjustments and (4) $16(c) $25 million of other decreasesincreases related to unrecognized tax benefits and other adjustments to deferred taxes. The charge to Accumulated other comprehensive income relates to deferred tax assets associated with the Company’s pension and postretirement obligations. The change in valuation allowance associated with foreign currency translation adjustments is related to changes in deferred tax assets for unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses on effective hedges and on foreign income previously taxed but not yet received in the US. The chargebenefit also relates to foreign currency translation adjustments for deferred tax assets recorded in various foreign jurisdictions. The decreaseincrease related to unrecognized tax benefits and other adjustments to deferred taxes includes adjustments to temporary differences and net operating loss carryforwards due to changes in uncertain tax positions.
 
A reconciliation of the significant differences between the US federal statutory tax rate of 35% and the effective income tax rate on income from continuing operations is as follows:
 
            
 Year Ended
             
 December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008 
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions) 
Income tax provision computed at US federal statutory tax rate    84     152     156     188     88     152 
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:            
Change in valuation allowance  (314)  (5)  9   39   (314)  (5)
Equity income and dividends  (20)  (17)  8   (41)  (20)  (17)
Expenses not resulting in tax benefits  4   18   38 
(Income) expense not resulting in tax impact  8   4   18 
US tax effect of foreign earnings and dividends  10   (5)  27   28   10   (5)
Other foreign tax rate differentials(1)
  (11)  (84)  (98)  (48)  (15)  (84)
Legislative changes  71   3   (21)  (71)  71   3 
Tax-deductible interest on foreign equity instruments & other related items  (76)  -   (19)
Tax-deductible interest on foreign equity investments and other related items  (3)  (76)  - 
State income taxes and other  9   1   10   12   9   1 
              
Income tax provision (benefit)  (243)  63   110   112   (243)  63 
              
 
(1)Includes impact of earnings from China and Singapore subject to tax holidays which expire between 2008 and 2013 and favorable tax rates in other jurisdictions.
 
Federal and state income taxes have not been provided on accumulated but undistributed earnings of $2.8$2.9 billion as of December 31, 20092010 as such earnings have been permanently reinvested in the business. The determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to the undistributed earnings is not practicable.
 
The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 20092010 was (101)%21% compared to 15%(97)% for the year ended December 31, 2008.2009. The effective tax rate for 2009 was favorably impacted by the release of


114


the US valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets, partially offset by lower earnings in jurisdictions participating in tax holidays, increases in valuation allowances on certain foreign net deferred tax assets and the effect of new tax legislation in Mexico. The effective rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 was favorably impacted by amendments to tax legislation in Mexico.
 
The Company operates under tax holidays in various countries which are effective through December 2013. In China, one of the Company’s entities has a tax holiday that provided for a zero percent tax rate in 2007 and 2008. For 2009 through 2011, the Company’s tax rate is 50% of the statutory rate, or 12.5% based on the 20092010 statutory rate of 25%. In Singapore, one of the Company’s entities has a tax holiday that provides for a zero percent tax rate through 2010. For 2011 through 2013, the Company’s2011. The Company realized no material benefits from tax rate will be 10% based on the current statutory rate of 17%. The impact of these tax holidays decreased foreign taxes $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Corporate Tax Reform Act of 2008 was signed by the German Federal President in August 2007. The Act reduced the Company’s combined corporate statutory tax rate from 40% to 30% while imposing limitations on the deductibility of certain expenses, including interest expense. The Company recognized a tax benefit of $39 million in 2007 related to the statutory rate reduction on its German net deferred tax liabilities.2010.
 
Mexico enacted the 2008 Fiscal Reform Bill on October 1, 2007. Effective January 1, 2008, the bill repealed the existing asset-based tax and established a dual income tax system consisting of a new minimum flat tax (the “IETU”) and the existing regular income tax system. The IETU system taxes companies on cash basis net income, consisting only of certain specified items of revenue and expense, at a rate of 16.5%, 17% and 17.5% for 2008, 2009 and 2010 forward, respectively. In general, companies must pay the higher of the income tax or the IETU, although unlike the previous asset tax, the IETU is not creditable against future income tax liabilities. The Company has determined that it will primarily


129


be subject to the IETU in future periods, and as such itperiods. Accordingly, the Company has recorded tax expense (benefit) of $19 million, $(5) million and $7 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and $20 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, for the tax effects of the IETU system.
 
OnIn December 7, 2009, Mexico enacted the 2010 Mexican Tax Reform Bill (“Tax Reform Bill”) to be effective January 1, 2010. Under this new legislation, the corporate income tax rate will bewas temporarily increased from 28% to 30% for 2010 through 2012, then reduced to 29% in 2013 and finally reduced back to 28% in 2014 and future years. These rate changes would impact the Company in the event that it reverts to paying taxes on a regular income tax basis versus anon the IETU basis. Further, under current law, income tax loss carryforwards reported in the tax consolidation that were not utilized on an individual company basis within 10 years were subject to recapture. The Tax Reform Bill as enacted acceleratesaccelerated this recapture period from 10 years to 5 years and effectively requiresrequired payment of taxes even if no benefit was obtained through the tax consolidation regime. Finally, significant modifications were also made to the rules for income taxes previously deferred on intercompany dividends, as well as to income taxes related to differences between consolidated and individual Mexican tax earnings and profits. The estimated income tax impact to the Company of this new legislationthe Tax Reform Bill at December 31, 2009 iswas $73 million payable $12 millionand was recorded to Income tax (provision) benefit in 2010, $14 million in 2012, $12 million in 2013 and $35 million in 2014 and thereafter.the consolidated statements of operations.
 
In March 2010, the Mexican tax authorities issued Miscellaneous Tax Resolutions (“MTRs”) to clarify various provisions included in the Tax Reform Bill related to recapture amounts for 2004 and prior years, including certain aspects of the recapture rules related to income tax loss carryforwards, intercompany dividends and differences between consolidated and individual Mexican tax earnings and profits. At March 31, 2010, the application of the MTRs resulted in a reduction of $43 million to the estimated income tax impact of the Tax Reform Bill that was initially recorded by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2009.
In December 2010, the Mexican tax authorities issued an additional MTR addressing tax year 2005 and subsequent periods. The MTRs issued in March 2010 and December 2010 eliminated the recapture tax on losses for which no tax benefit was received in consolidation and also clarified certain other aspects of the Tax Reform Bill originally enacted in December 2009. The December 2010 MTR resulted in an additional reduction of $27 million to the estimated tax liability previously recorded by the Company. After inflation and exchange rate changes, the Company’s estimated tax liability at December 31, 2010 related to the combined Tax Reform Bill and 2010 MTRs is $6 million, payable from 2011 to 2018.
In March 2010, the President of the United States signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. Currently, employers providing retiree prescription drug coverage that is at least as valuable as the coverage offered under Medicare Part D are entitled to a subsidy from the government. Prior to the new law, employers were entitled to deduct the entire cost of providing the retiree prescription drug coverage, even though a portion was offset by the subsidy. Under the new legislation, in years subsequent to 2012, the tax deductible prescription coverage is reduced by the amount of the subsidy. As a result, the Company reduced its deferred tax asset related to postretirement prescription drug coverage by the amount of the subsidy to be received subsequent to 2012. This reduction of $7 million to the Company’s deferred tax asset was recorded to Income tax (provision) benefit in the consolidated statements of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
On December 17, 2010, the President of the United States signed a multi-billion dollar tax package, the Tax Relief, Unemployment Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 (2010 Tax Relief Act or act). The 2010 Tax Relief Act extends the Bush-era individual and capital gains/dividend tax cuts for all individual taxpayers for two years and includes a one year payroll tax cut for individuals. The act also increases 50 percent bonus depreciation to 100 percent for qualified investments made after September 8, 2010 and before January 1, 2012, and the act also makes 50 percent bonus depreciation available for qualified property placed in service after December 31, 2011 and before January 1, 2013. The 2010 Tax Relief Act also provided a two year extension of expired provisions that were relevant to the Company including the research tax credit and look through treatment for controlled foreign corporations. The impact to the company of the new legislation was not material for the year ended December 31, 2010, but the items noted will provide additional tax benefits to the company in 2011 and 2012.


130


As of December 31, 2009,2010, the Company had US federal net operating loss carryforwards of $41$39 million that are subject to limitation. These net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2021. At December 31, 2010, the Company also had state net operating loss carryforwards, net of federal tax impact, of $52 million, $48 million of which are offset by a valuation allowance due to uncertain recoverability. A portion of these loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2011.
 
The Company also had foreign net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 20092010 of $1$1.0 billion for Luxembourg, France, Spain, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, Germany Mexico and other foreign jurisdictions with various expiration dates. Net operating losses in China have various carryforward periods and begin expiring in 2011. Net operating losses in Luxembourg, Canada and Germanymost other foreign jurisdictions have no expiration date. Net operating losses in Mexico have a ten year carryforward period and began to expire in 2009. However, these losses are not available for use under the new IETU tax regulations in Mexico. As the IETU is the primary system upon which the Company will be subject to tax in future periods, no deferred tax asset has been reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20092010 for these income tax loss carryforwards.
 
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC Topic740-10 effective January 1, 2007. 740Income Taxes(“FASB ASC Topic740-10 740”), clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax benefit is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FASB ASC Topic740-10 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. As a result of the implementation of FASB ASC Topic740-10, the Company increased Retained earnings by $14 million and decreased Goodwill by $2 million as included in the consolidated balance


115


sheets. In addition, certain tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, as well as related potential penalties and interest, were reclassified from current liabilities to noncurrent liabilities. Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009 relate to various US and foreign jurisdictions.
 
A reconciliation of the amount of unrecognized tax benefits included in Uncertain tax positions in the consolidated balance sheets is as follows:
 
                
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008  2010 2009
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
As of the beginning of the year    195     200     208     195 
Increases in tax positions for the current year  19   -   -   19 
Increases in tax positions for prior years  39   7   85   39 
Decreases in tax positions of prior years  (38)  (10)  (48)  (38)
Settlements  (7)  (2)  (1)  (7)
         
As of the end of the year  208   195   244   208 
         
 
Included in the unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 20092010 are $208$264 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2010, $15 million of unrecognized tax benefits are included in current Other liabilities (Note 11) in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Income tax (provision) benefit in the provision for income taxes. consolidated statements of operations as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits  12   7   2 
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, cumulative interest and 2008,penalties included in Uncertain tax positions in the Company has recorded a liability ofconsolidated balance sheets were $56 million and $45 million, and $38 million, respectively, for interest and penalties. This amount includes an increase of $7 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, $5 million of unrecognized tax benefits are included in current Other liabilities (Note 12).
 
The Company operates in the US (including multiple state jurisdictions), Germany and approximately 40 other foreign jurisdictions including Canada, China, France, Mexico and Singapore. Examinations are ongoing in a number of those jurisdictions including, most significantly, in Germany for the years 2001 to 2004 and 2005 to 2007.2007, and in the US for the years 2006 to 2008, which were selected for audit in 2010. The Company’s US federal income tax returns for 2003 and beyond are open for examination under statute. The US Company’s German corporate


131


tax years 2006 to 2008 were selectedreturns for audit in 2010.2001 and beyond are open for examination under statute. Currently, unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months.
 
20.19. Stock-Based and Other Management Compensation Plans
In December 2004, the Company approved a stock incentive plan for executive officers, key employees and directors, a deferred compensation plan for executive officers and key employees as well as other management incentive programs.
The stock incentive plan allows for the issuance or delivery of up to 16,250,000 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock through the award of stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and other stock-based awards as may be approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. At the Company’s discretion under the 2004 incentive plan, the Company has the right to award dividend equivalents on RSU grants which are earned in accordance with the Company’s common stock dividend policy and are reinvested in additional RSUs. Dividend equivalents on these RSUs are forfeited if vesting conditions are not met.
 
In April 2009, the Company approved a global incentive plan which replaces the Company’s 2004 stock incentive plan. The 2009 global incentive planGlobal Incentive Plan (“GIP”) enables the Compensation Committeecompensation committee of the Board of Directors to award incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of Series A common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and incentive bonuses (which may be paid in cash or stock or a combination thereof), any of which may be performance-based, with vesting and other award provisions that provide effective incentive to Company employees (including officers), non-management directors and other service providers. Under the 2009 global incentive plan,GIP, the companyCompany no longer has the option tocan grant RSUs with the right to participate in dividends or dividend equivalents.
 
The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2009 global incentive planGIP is equal to 5,350,000 shares plus (a) any shares of Common StockSeries A common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2004 stock


116


incentive planStock Incentive Plan (“SIP”) (not including any shares of Common StockSeries A common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2004 stock incentive planSIP or any shares of Common StockSeries A common stock that were issued pursuant to awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan)SIP) and (b) any awards under the 2004 stock incentive plan that remain outstanding that cease for any reason to be subject to such awards (other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the award to the extent that such award is exercised for or settled in vested and non-forfeitable shares). As of December 31, 2009, a2010, total of 3,812,359 shares remained available for awards under the 2009 stock incentive plan. Aand total of 7,185,959 and 1,481,886 shares were subject to outstanding awards underare as follows:
         
  Shares Available for
 Shares Subject to
  Awards Outstanding Awards
 
2009 Global Incentive Plan   2,322,450    2,530,454 
2004 Stock Incentive Plan  -   5,923,147 
Upon the 2004termination of a participant’s employment with the Company by reason of death or disability or by the Company without cause (as defined in the respective award agreements), an award in amount equal to (i) the value of the award granted multiplied by (ii) a fraction, (x) the numerator of which is the number of full months between grant date and the date of such termination, and (y) the denominator of which is the term of the award, such product to be rounded down to the nearest whole number, and reduced by (iii) the value of any award that previously vested, shall immediately vest and become payable to the Participant. Upon the termination of a Participant’s employment with the Company for any other reason, any unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited and cancelled without consideration.
There was $19 million and $0 million of tax benefit realized from stock incentive planoption exercises and vesting of RSUs during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, global incentive plan, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company reversed $8 million of the $19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
Deferred Compensation
The 2004 deferred compensation plan provides an aggregate maximum amount payable of $196 million. The initial component of the deferred compensation plan vested in 2004 and was paid in the first quarter of 2005. In May 2007, the Original Shareholders sold their remaining equity interest in the Company triggering an Exit Event, as defined by the plan. Cash compensation of $74 million, representing the participants’ 2005 and 2006 contingent benefits, was paid to the participants during the year ended December 31, 2007. Participants continuing in the 2004 deferred compensation plan (see below for discussion regarding certain participant’s decision to participate in a revised program) continue to vest in their 2008 and 2009 time-based and performance-based entitlements as defined in the deferred compensation plan. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded compensation expense of $1 million, $3 million and $84 million, respectively, associated with this plan. As of December 31, 2009, there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with this plan.
 
OnIn April 2, 2007, certain participants in the Company’s 2004 deferred compensation plan elected to participate in a revised program, which includes both cash awards and restricted stock units (see Restricted Stock Units below). Under the revised program, participants relinquished their cash awards of up to $30 million that would have contingently accrued from2007-2009 under the original plan. In lieu of these awards, the revised deferred compensation program provides for a future cash award in an amount equal to 90% of the maximum potential payout under the original plan, plus growth pursuant to one of three participant-selected notional investment vehicles, as defined in the associated agreements. Participants must remain employed through 2010 to vest in the new award. The Company will recognize expense through December 31, 2010 and make award payments under the revised program in the first quarter of 2011, unless participants elect to further defer the payment of their individual awards. Based on participation in the revised program, the Company expensed $9 million, $10 million $8 million and $6$8 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 2007,2008, respectively, related to the revised program and made payments of $4 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 to participants who left the Company and $28 million to active employees during December 2010. As of December 31, 2010, $1 million remains to be paid during 2011 under the revised program.
As of December 31, 2009, there was no deferred compensation payable remaining associated with the 2004 deferred compensation plan. The Company recorded expense related to participants continuing in the 2004 deferred


132


compensation plan of $0 million, $1 million and $3 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
In December 2007, the Company adopted a deferred compensation plan whereby certain of the Company’s senior employees and directors were offered the opportunity to defer a portion of their compensation in exchange for a future payment amount equal to their deferments plus or minus certain amounts based upon the market performance of specified measurement funds selected by the participant. Participants are required to make deferral elections under the plan prior to January 1 of the year such deferrals will be withheld from their compensation. The Company expensed less than $1 million and $1 million during each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively, related to this plan.
 
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Effective January 1, 2004, the Company adopted a long-term incentive plan (the “LTIP Plan”) which covers certain members of management and other key employees of the Company. The LTIP Plan is a three-year cash based plan in which awards are based on annual and three-year cumulative targets (as defined in the LTIP Plan). In February 2007, $26 million was paid to the LTIP plan participants. There are no additional amounts due under the LTIP Plan.
 
In December 2008, the Company granted time-vesting cash awards of $22 million to the Company’s executive officers and certain other key employees. Each award of cash vests 30% on October 14, 2009, 30% on October 14, 2010 and 40% on October 14, 2011. In its sole discretion, the compensation committee of the Board of Directors may at any time convert all or a portion of the cash award to an award of time-vesting restricted stock units. The liability cash awards are being accrued and expensed over the term of the agreements outlined above. During
Activity recorded in the year ended December 31, 2009, less than $1 million was paid to participants who left the Company. In October


117


2009, the Company paid cash awards totaling $6 million to active employees, representing 30% of the remaining outstanding cash awards. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company expensed $7 million and less than $1 million, respectively,consolidated financial statements related to the time-vesting cash awards.awards is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Expense   7    7    1 
Payments to active employees  5   6   - 
Payments to terminated employees  1   1   - 
 
Stock Options
 
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan that makes awards of stock options to the Company’s executives and certain employees. It is the Company’s policy to grant options with an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low price of the Company’s Series A common stock on the grant date. The options issued have a ten-year term ranging from seven to ten years and vest on a graded basis over periods ranging from one to fivefour years. The estimated value of the Company’s stock-based awards less expected forfeitures is recognized over the awards’ respective vesting period on a straight-line basis.
 
Generally, vested stock options are exercised through a broker-assisted cashless exercise program. A broker-assisted cashless exercise is the simultaneous exercise of a stock option by an employee and a sale of the shares through a broker. Authorized shares of the Company’s Series A common stock are used to settle stock options.
In October 2010, the Company granted awards of stock options to certain executive officers of the Company that require a holding period of one year subsequent to exercising a stock option award for net profit shares (as defined below) acquired upon exercise. Net profit shares means the aggregate number of Shares determined by the Company’s human resources department representing the total number of shares remaining after taking into account the following costs related to exercise: (i) the aggregate option price with respect to the exercise; (ii) the amount of all applicable taxes with respect to the exercise, assuming the participant’s maximum applicable federal, state and local tax rates (and applicable employment taxes); and (iii) any transaction costs.


133


The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing method. The weighted average assumptions used in the model are outlined in the following table:
 
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008
Risk-free interest rate            1.90 %            3.30 %            4.60 %   1.27 %   1.90 %   3.30 %
Estimated life in years  5.20   7.70   6.80    5.72    5.20    7.70 
Dividend yield  0.96%  0.38%  0.42%   0.59 %   0.96 %   0.38 %
Volatility  54.30%  31.40%  27.50%   51.75 %   54.30 %   31.40 %
 
The computation of the expected volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes calculations for new grants is based on the Company’s historical volatilities. When establishing the expected life assumptions, the Company reviews annual historical employee exercise behavior of option grants with similar vesting periods.
 
AThe summary of changes in stock options outstanding is as follows:
 
                                
 Year Ended December 31, 2009      Weighted-
   
     Weighted-
        Average
   
     Average
      Weighted-
 Remaining
 Aggregate
 
   Weighted-
 Remaining
 Aggregate
  Number of
 Average
 Contractual
 Intrinsic
 
 Number of
 Average
 Contractual
 Intrinsic
  Options Exercise Price Term Value 
 Options Exercise Price Term Value  (In millions) (In $) (In years) (In $ millions) 
 (In millions) (In $) (In years) (In $ millions) 
As of December 31, 2008    7.0     19.35          
As of December 31, 2009         6.0   19.01         
Granted  0.1   17.17           0.2   32.40         
Exercised  (0.8)  17.79           (0.8)  17.32         
Forfeited  (0.3)  34.06           (0.1)  39.42         
      
As of December 31, 2009  6.0   19.01   5.6     79 
As of December 31, 2010  5.3   19.27          4.2          115 
                  
Options exercisable at end of year  5.0   17.09   5.3   75   4.7   18.14   4.0   108 
                  
 
The weighted-average grant-date fair valuevalues of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $7.46, $16.78, and $14.42, respectively, per option. is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
 
Total   $14.76    $7.46    $16.78 
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $9 million, $27 million, and $84 million, respectively. cash received from stock option exercises is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Intrinsic value         13          9          27 
Cash received  14   14   18 
As of December 31, 2009,2010, the Company had approximately $7$5 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options, excluding estimatedactual forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining vesting periodsweighted-average period of the options. Cash received from stock option exercises was $14 million, $18 million, and $69 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. There was no tax benefit realized from stock option exercises during the year ended December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company reversed $8 million of the $19 million tax benefit that was realized during the year ended December 31, 2007.2.4 years.


118


During 2009, the Company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees. As a result of that modification, the Company recognized additional compensation expense of $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.


134


Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)
The Company’s RSUs are net settled by withholding shares of the Company’s Series A common stock to cover minimum statutory income taxes and remitting the remaining shares of the Company’s Series A common stock to an individual brokerage account. Authorized shares of the Company’s Series A common stock are used to settle RSUs.
 
Performance-based RSUs. The Company grants performance-based RSUs to the Company’s executive officers and certain employees once per year. The Company may also grant performance-based RSUs to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur. The number of performance-based RSUs that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as peraccording to the terms of the specific award agreement: The achievement of 1)a) internal profitability targets (performance condition) and 2)b) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the Company’s stock performance versus a defined peer group (market condition).
 
The performance-based RSUs generally cliff-vest during the Company’s quarter-end September 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant. The ultimate number of shares of the Company’s Series A common stock issued will range from zero to stretch, with stretch defined individually under each award, net of shares used to cover personal income taxes withheld. The market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets, as applicable, and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant, less estimated forfeitures. For performance-based RSUs granted without a performance condition, compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant, less estimated forfeitures.
In April 2007, Upon the termination of participant’s employment by the Company grantedwithout cause prior to the vesting date, the participant is eligible for a prorated number of performance-based RSUs to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning October 1, 2008 through October 1, 2011 and include a market condition. The performance-based RSUs awarded include acatch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts, subject to certain maximums. Compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant, less estimated forfeitures.formula as outlined in each agreement.
 
A summary of changes in performance-based RSUs outstanding is as follows:
 
                
   Weighted
    Weighted
 Number of
 Average
  Number of
 Average
 Units Fair Value  Units Fair Value
 (In thousands) (In $)  (In thousands) (In $)
Nonvested at December 31, 2008       1,188     19.65 
Nonvested at December 31, 2009  1,415   25.24 
Granted  420   38.16   350   41.34 
Vested  (79)  21.30   (179(1)  23.63 
Cancelled  (69)  23.63 
Forfeited  (114)  17.28   (72)  29.64 
      
Nonvested at December 31, 2009  1,415   25.24 
Nonvested at December 31, 2010  1,445    29.19 
      
(1)Shares vested on December 31, 2010; however, the shares were not released until January 2011.
 
The fair value of shares vested for performance-based RSUs during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $2 million and $3 million, respectively. There were no vestings that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2007.is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Total   8    2    3 
 
Fair value for the Company’s performance-based RSUs was estimated at the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation approach.approach less the present value of the expected dividends not received during the performance period. Monte Carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the Company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields, volatilities and stock return correlations. These returns were used to calculate future performance-based RSU vesting percentages and the


135


simulated values of the vested performance-based RSUs were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate, yielding the expected value of these performance-based RSUs.


119


The range of assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation approach is outlined in the following table:
 
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008
Risk-free interest rate  1.11%   1.05%   4.53 - 4.55%   0.79%   1.11%   1.05% 
Dividend yield  0.00 - 4.64%   0.00 - 12.71%   0.00 - 2.76%   0.00 - 4.18%   0.00 - 4.64%   0.00 - 12.71% 
Volatility  25 - 75%   20 - 70%   20 - 45%   25 - 70%   25 - 75%   20 - 70% 
Time-based RSUs. The Company grants non-employee Directors time-based RSUs annually that generally vest one year after grant. The fair value of the time-based RSUs is equal to the closing price of the Company’s Series A common stock on the grant date less the present value of the expected dividends not received during the vesting period.
The Company also grants time-based RSUs to the Company’s executives and certain employees that vest ratably over time intervals ranging from three to four years. The fair value of the time-based RSUs is equal to the average of the high and low price of the Company’s Series A common stock on the grant date less the present value of the expected dividends not received during the vesting period. Upon the termination of participant’s employment by the Company without cause prior to the vesting date, the participant is eligible for a prorated number of time-based RSUs based on a formula as outlined in each agreement.
A summary of changes in time-based RSUs outstanding is as follows:
                 
  Employee Time-based RSUs  Director Time-Based RSUs 
     Weighted
     Weighted
 
  Number of
  Average
  Number of
  Average
 
  Units  Fair Value  Units  Fair Value 
  (In thousands)  (In $)  (In thousands)  (In $) 
 
Nonvested at December 31, 2009         502   25.57             41   16.58 
Granted  322   30.12   21   33.13 
Vested  (165)  27.62   (41)  16.58 
Forfeited  (52)  25.10   -   - 
                 
Nonvested at December 31, 2010  607   26.41   21   33.13 
                 
As of December 31, 2010, there was approximately $40 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs, excluding actual forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
The fair value of shares vested for time-based RSUs is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Total         6          2          1 
In October and December 2010, the Company granted time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs, respectively, to executive officers and certain employees of the Company. The grant requires a holding period of seven years from the grant date of the awards for 0 % to 45 % of the shares vested, depending on salary level, as specified in each individual agreement. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) has a requirement to hold 75 % of the shares vested for seven years from the grant date. The fair value of the RSUs with holding periods were discounted an additional 30 % due to the lack of transferability of these RSUs during the holding period. The discount was determined using the weighted-average results as calculated under the Chaffe and Finnerty models.


136


Performance Units
 
In December 2008, the Company granted 200,000 performance units to be settled in cash to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.CEO. The terms of the performance units are substantially similar to the performance-based RSUs granted in December 2008 and include a performance condition and a market condition. The value of the performance units is equivalent to the value of one share of the Company’s Series A common stock and any amounts that may vest under the performance unit award agreement are to be settled in cash rather than shares of the Company’s Series A common stock. The compensation committee of the Board of Directors may elect to convert all or any portion of the performance units award to an award of an equivalent value of performance-based RSUs.
Time-based RSUs. The Company grants non-employee Directors time-based RSUs annually that generallyperformance units vest one year after grant. The fair value of the time-based RSUs is equal to the closing price of the Company’s Series A common stock on the grant date.
The Company also grants time-based RSUs to the Company’s executives and certain employees that vest ratably over time intervals ranging from two to four years. The fair value of the time-based RSUs is equal to the average of the high and low price of the Company’s Series A common stock on the grant date.
A summary of changes in time-based RSUs outstanding is as follows:
                 
  Employee Time-based RSUs  Director Time-Based RSUs 
     Weighted
     Weighted
 
  Number of
  Average
  Number of
  Average
 
  Units  Fair Value  Units  Fair Value 
  (In thousands)  (In $)  (In thousands)  (In $) 
 
Nonvested at December 31, 2008    105     39.34     15     44.02 
Granted  421   23.13   41   16.58 
Vested       (23)  37.60          (15)  44.02 
Forfeited  (1)  39.53   -   - 
                 
Nonvested at December 31, 2009  502   25.57   41   16.58 
                 
As of December 31, 2009, there was approximately $35 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs, excluding estimated forfeitures, which will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting periods. The fair value of shares vested for time-based RSUs during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $2 million and $1 million, respectively. No RSUs vested during the year ended December 31, 2007.October 14, 2011.
 
21.20. Leases
 
Total rent expense charged to operations under all operating leases was $148 million, $141 million and $122 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Total         160          148          141 
Future minimum lease payments under non-


120


cancelablenon-cancelable rental and lease agreements which have initial or remaining terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 20092010 are as follows:
 
                
 Capital Operating  Capital Operating 
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions) 
2010    63     50 
2011  39   36          43          62 
2012  38   31   42   48 
2013  35   24   39   44 
2014  35   16   39   38 
2015  34   45 
Later years  276   46   285   99 
Sublease income  -   (29)  -   (25)
          
Minimum lease commitments  486        174   482   311 
      
Less amounts representing interest  244       237     
      
Present value of net minimum lease obligations       242       245     
      
 
The Company expects that, in the normal course of business, leases that expire will be renewed or replaced by other leases.
 
22.21. Derivative Financial Instruments
 
Interest Rate Risk Management
 
To reduce the interest rate risk inherent in the Company’s variable rate debt, the Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of the variable rate debt to a fixed rate obligation. These interest rate swap agreements are designated as cash flow hedges. If an interest rate swap agreement is terminated prior to its maturity, the amount previously recorded into Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net is recognized into earnings over the period that the hedged transaction impacts earnings. If the hedging relationship is discontinued because it is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur according to the original strategy, any related amounts previously recorded into Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net are recognized into earnings immediately.


137


As of December 31, 2006, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement in place with a notional value of $300 million. On March 29, 2007, in connection with the April 2007 debt refinancing, the Company terminated this interest rate swap agreement and recognized a gain of $2 million related to amounts previously recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net.
In March 2007, in anticipation of the April 2007 debt refinancing, the Company entered into various US dollar and Euro interest rate swap agreements, which became effective on April 2, 2007, with notional amounts of $1.6 billion and €150 million, respectively. The notional amount of the $1.6 billion US dollar interest rate swaps decreased by $400 million effective January 2, 2008 and decreased by another $200 million effective January 2, 2009. To offset the declines, the Company entered into US dollar interest rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $400 million which became effective on January 2, 2008 and an additional US dollar interest rate swap with a notional amount of $200 million which became effective April 2, 2009. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps decreased by $100 million effective January 4, 2010. No new swaps were entered into to offset the declines.
 
TheIn August 2010, the Company recognized interest (expense) income from hedging activities relating to interest rate swaps of ($63) million, ($18) million and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company recordedexecuted a net loss of $0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and less than $1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, to Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations for the ineffective portion of theforward-starting interest rate swap agreements. Thewith a notional amount of $1.1 billion. As a result of the swap, the Company recorded an unrealized gain (loss) onhas fixed the LIBOR portion of $1.1 billion of the Company’s floating rate debt at 1.7125 % effective January 2, 2012 through January 2, 2014.
US-dollar interest rate swaps of $15 million and ($79) million during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.swap derivative arrangements are as follows:
           
As of December 31, 2010 
Notional Value  Effective Date Expiration Date Fixed Rate (1) 
(In $ millions)        
 
                     100  April 2, 2007 January 2, 2011                      4.92% 
 800  April 2, 2007 January 2, 2012  4.92% 
 400  January 2, 2008 January 2, 2012  4.33% 
 200  April 2, 2009 January 2, 2012  1.92% 
 1,100  January 2, 2012 January 2, 2014  1.71% 
           
 2,600         
           
(1)Fixes the LIBOR portion of the Company’s US-dollar denominated variable rate borrowings (Note 13).
           
As of December 31, 2009 
Notional Value  Effective Date Expiration Date Fixed Rate (1) 
(In $ millions)        
 
                     100  April 2, 2007 January 4, 2010                      4.92% 
 100  April 2, 2007 January 2, 2011  4.92% 
 800  April 2, 2007 January 2, 2012  4.92% 
 400  January 2, 2008 January 2, 2012  4.33% 
 200  April 2, 2009 January 2, 2012  1.92% 
           
 1,600         
           
(1)Fixes the LIBOR portion of the Company’s US-dollar denominated variable rate borrowings (Note 13).
Euro interest rate swap derivative arrangements are as follows:
           
As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 
Notional Value  Effective Date Expiration Date Fixed Rate (1) 
(In € millions)        
 
                     150  April 2, 2007 April 2, 2011                      4.04% 
(1)Fixes the EURIBOR portion of the Company’s Euro denominated variable rate borrowings (Note 13).


121138


Interest rate swap activity recorded in the consolidated financial statements is as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Hedging activities            
Interest expense       (68)       (63)       (18)
Ineffective portion            
Other income (expense), net  -   -   1 
Unrealized gain (loss)            
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax  17   15   (79)
Foreign Exchange Risk Management
 
Certain entitiessubsidiaries have receivablesassets and payablesliabilities denominated in currencies other than their respective functional currencies, which creates foreign exchange risk. The Company enters into foreign currency forwards and swaps to minimize its exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Through these instruments, the Company mitigates its foreign currency exposure on transactions with third party entities as well as intercompany transactions. The currently outstanding foreign currency contracts are hedging booked exposure, however the Company may from time to time hedge its currency exposure related to forecasted transactions. Forward contractsforwards and swaps are not designated as hedges under FASB ASC Topic 815. Gains and losses on foreign currency forwards and swaps entered into to offset foreign exchange impacts on intercompany balances are classified as Other income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of operations. Gains and losses on foreign currency forwards and swaps entered into to offset foreign exchange impacts on all other assets and liabilities are classified as Foreign exchange gain (loss), net, in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
The following table indicates the total US dollar equivalents of net foreign exchange exposure related to (short) long foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding by currency. All of the contracts included in the table below will have approximately offsetting effects from actual underlying payables, receivables, intercompany loans or other assets or liabilities subject to foreign exchange remeasurement.
 
     
  20102011 Maturity 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Currency
    
Euro         (372(217)
British pound sterling  (9043)
Chinese renminbi  (200265)
Mexican peso  (522)
Singapore dollar  2726 
Canadian dollar  (4835)
Japanese yen  81 
Brazilian real  (1112)
Swedish krona  1514 
Other  (16)
     
Total  (677433)
     
 
To protect the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, the Company entered into cross currency swaps with certain financial institutions in 2004. The cross currency swaps and the Euro-denominated portion of the senior term loan were designated as a hedge of a net investment of a foreign operation. The Company dedesignated the net investment hedge due to the debt refinancing in April 2007 and redesignated the cross currency swaps and new senior Euro term loan in July 2007. As a result, the Company recorded $26 million ofmark-to-market losses related to the cross currency swaps and the new senior Euro term loan during this period.
 
Under the terms of the cross currency swap arrangements, the Company paid approximately €13 million in interest and received approximately $16 million in interest on June 15 and December 15 of each year. The fair value of the net obligation under the cross currency swaps was included in current Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2007. Upon maturity of the


139


cross currency swap agreements in June 2008, the Company owed €276 million ($426 million) and was owed $333 million. In settlement of the obligation, the Company paid $93 million (net of interest of $3 million) in June 2008.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company dedesignated €385 million of the €400 Euro-denominated portion of the term loan, previously designated as a hedge of a net investment of a foreign operation. The remaining €15 million Euro-denominated portion of the term loan was dedesignated as a hedge of a net investment of a foreign operation in June 2009. Prior to the dedesignations, the Company had been using external derivative contracts to offset foreign currency exposures on certain intercompany loans. As a result of the dedesignations, the foreign currency exposure created by the Euro-denominated term loan is expected to offset the foreign currency exposure on certain intercompany loans, decreasing the need for external derivative contracts and reducing the Company’s exposure to external counterparties.
 
The notional values of the foreign currency forwards and swaps are as follows:
         
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Total            751          1,463 
The effective portion of the gain (loss) on the derivative (cross currency swaps) is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the amount charged toconsolidated financial statements as follows:


122


             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net         -          -        (19)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net was $0 million, $(19) million and $(19) million, respectively.
The gain (loss) related to items excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness of the cross currency swaps are recorded to Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the amount charged to Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations was $0 million, $1 million and $(6) million, respectively.as follows:
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Other income (expense), net         -          -          1 
 
Commodity Risk Management
 
The Company has exposure to the prices of commodities in its procurement of certain raw materials. The Company manages its exposure to commodity risk primarily through the use of long-term supply agreements, multi-year purchasing and derivative instruments.sales agreements and forward purchase contracts. The Company regularly assesses its practice of purchasing a portion of its commodity requirementsusing forward purchase contracts and utilization of other raw material hedging instruments in addition to forward purchase contracts, in accordance with changes in market conditions. Forward purchases and swap contracts for raw materials are principally settled through actualphysical delivery of the physical commodity. For qualifying contracts, the Company has elected to apply the normal purchases and normal sales exception of FASB ASC Topic 815 as it was probablebased on the probability at the inception and throughout the term of the contract that theythe Company would not settle net and the transaction would result in the physical delivery.delivery of the commodity. As such, realized gains and losses on these contracts are included in the cost of the commodity upon the settlement of the contract.
 
In addition, the Company occasionally enters into financial derivatives to hedge a component of a raw material or energy source. Typically, these types of transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments are marked to market at each reporting period and gains (losses) are included in Cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company recognized no gain or loss from these types of contracts during the years


140


ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and less than $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.2008. As of December 31, 2009,2010, the Company did not have any open financial derivative contracts for commodities.
 
The following table presents informationInformation regarding changes in the fair value of the Company’s derivative arrangements:arrangements is as follows:
 
         
  Year ended December 31, 2009 
  Gain (Loss)
    
  Recognized
    
  in Other
  Gain (Loss)
 
  Comprehensive
  Recognized
 
  Income  in Income 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments        
Interest rate swaps            (40)            (63(1)
Derivatives designated as net investment hedging instruments        
Euro-denominated term loan      
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments        
Foreign currency forwards and swaps     (20)
         
Total  (40)  (83)
         
                 
  Year Ended December 31, 2010  Year Ended December 31, 2009 
  Gain (Loss)
     Gain (Loss)
    
  Recognized
     Recognized
    
  in Other
  Gain (Loss)
  in Other
  Gain (Loss)
 
  Comprehensive
  Recognized
  Comprehensive
  Recognized
 
  Income  in Income  Income  in Income 
  (In $ millions)  (In $ millions) 
 
Derivatives designated as cash flow                
hedging instruments                
Interest rate swaps         (31(1)         (68(2)         (40(3)         (63(2)
Derivatives not designated as hedging                
instruments                
Foreign currency forwards and swaps  -   33   -   (20)
     
     
Total  (31)  (35)  (40)  (83)
                 
 
(1)Amount excludes $5 million of losses associated with the Company’s equity method investments’ derivative activity and $15 million of tax expense.
(2)Amount represents reclassification from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net and is classified as interestInterest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
(3)Amount excludes $8 million of tax expense.
 
See Note 23,22, Fair Value Measurements, for additional information regarding the fair value of the Company’s derivative arrangements.
 
23.22. Fair Value Measurements
 
As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted certain provisions of FASB ASC Topic 820 on January 1, 2008 and 2009. FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of inputs are defined as follows:
 
Level 1 — unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by the Company
 
Level 2 — inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those inputs classified as Level 1


123


Level 3 — inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation
 
FASB ASC Topic 820 requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation.
 
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and include marketable securities and derivative financial instruments. Marketable securities include US government and corporate bonds mortgage-backed securities and equity securities. Derivative financial instruments include interest rate swaps and foreign currency forwards and swaps.
 
Marketable Securities. Where possible, the Company utilizes quoted prices in active markets to measure debt and equity securities; such items are classified as Level 1 in the hierarchy and include equity securities and US government bonds. When quoted market prices for identical assets are unavailable, varying valuation techniques are


141


used. Common inputs in valuing these assets include, among others, benchmark yields and issuer spreads, forward mortgage-backed securities trade prices and recently reported trades.spreads. Such assets are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy and typically include mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds and other US government securities.
 
Derivative Financial Instruments. Derivative financial instruments are valued in the market using discounted cash flow techniques. These techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs such as interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instrument’s term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk. Significant inputs to the derivative valuation for interest rate swaps and foreign currency forwards and swaps are observable in the active markets and are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy.
Mutual Funds. Valued at the net asset value per share or unit multiplied by the number of shares or units held as of the measurement date.


124142


The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about the Company’s assetsAssets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:basis are as follows:
 
                        
 Fair Value Measurement Using    Fair Value Measurement Using  
 Quoted Prices
 Significant
    Quoted Prices
 Significant
  
 in Active
 Other
    in Active
 Other
  
 Markets for
 Observable
    Markets for
 Observable
  
 Identical Assets
 Inputs
    Identical Assets
 Inputs
  
 (Level 1) (Level 2) Total  (Level 1) (Level 2) Total
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Marketable securities, at fair value                        
US government debt securities         —          28          28 
US corporate debt securities     1   1               -               1               1 
Equity securities  52      52 
Money market deposits and other securities     2   2 
Mutual funds  77   -   77 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments                        
Foreign currency forwards and swaps     12   12(1)  -   3   3 (1)
         
  
Total assets as of December 31, 2010  77   4   81 
  
  
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging            
instruments            
Interest rate swaps  -   (59)  (59)(2)
Interest rate swaps  -   (14)  (14)(3)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments            
Foreign currency forwards and swaps  -   (10)  (10)(2)
      
Total liabilities as of December 31, 2010  -   (83)  (83)
      
Marketable securities, at fair value            
US government debt securities  -   28   28 
US corporate debt securities  -   1   1 
      
Total debt securities  -   29   29 
Equity securities  52   -   52 
Mutual funds  2   -   2 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments            
Foreign currency forwards and swaps  -   12   12 (1)
  
  
Total assets as of December 31, 2009  52   43   95   54   41   95 
         
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments            
  
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging            
instruments            
Interest rate swaps     (68)  (68(2)  -   (68)  (68)(2)
Interest rate swaps     (44)  (44(3)  -   (44)  (44)(3)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments                        
Foreign currency forwards and swaps     (7)  (7(2)  -   (7)  (7)(2)
             
Total liabilities as of December 31, 2009     (119)  (119)  -   (119)  (119)
             
Marketable securities            
US government debt securities     52   52 
US corporate debt securities     3   3 
Equity securities  42      42 
Money market deposits and other securities     3   3 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments            
Foreign currency forwards and swaps     54   54 (1)
       
Total assets as of December 31, 2008  42   112   154 
       
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments            
Interest rate swaps     (42)  (42(2)
Interest rate swaps     (76)  (76(3)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments            
Foreign currency forwards and swaps     (25)  (25(2)
       
Total liabilities as of December 31, 2008     (143)  (143)
       
 
 
(1)Included in current Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
(2)Included in current Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
(3)Included in noncurrent Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.


143


 
Summarized below are the carryingCarrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments that are not carried at fair value onin the Company’s consolidated balance sheets:sheets are as follows:
 
                                
 As of December 31, As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
 Carrying
 Fair
 Carrying
 Fair
  Carrying
 Fair
 Carrying
 Fair
 
 Amount Value Amount Value  Amount Value Amount Value 
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions) 
Cost investments       183        —        184        —   139   -   129 (1)  - 
Insurance contracts in nonqualified pension trusts  66   66   67   67   70   70   66   66 
Long-term debt, including current installments of long-term debt  3,361   3,246   3,381   2,404 
Long-term debt, including current installments of long-term                
debt  3,064   3,087   3,361   3,246 


125


(1)As Adjusted (Note 4 and Note 8)
In general, the cost investments included in the table above are not publicly traded and their fair values are not readily determinable; however, the Company believes the carrying values approximate or are less than the fair values.
 
As of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, trade payables, short-term debt and the current installments of long-term debt approximate carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These items have been excluded from the table with the exception of the current installments of long-term debt. Additionally, certain noncurrent receivables, principally insurance recoverables, are carried at net realizable value.
 
The fair value of long-term debt is based on valuations from third-party banks and market quotations.
 
24.23. Commitments and Contingencies
 
The Company is involved in a number of legal and regulatory proceedings, lawsuits and claims incidental to the normal conduct of business, relating to such matters as product liability, contract, antitrust, intellectual property, workers’ compensation, chemical exposure, prior acquisitions and divestitures, past waste disposal practices and release of chemicals into the environment. While it is impossible at this time to determine with certainty the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, lawsuits and claims, the Company is actively defending those matters where the Company is named as a defendant. Additionally, the Company believes, based on the advice of legal counsel, that adequate reserves have been made and that the ultimate outcomes of all such litigation and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company; however, the ultimate outcome of any given matter may have a material adverse impact on the results of operations or cash flows of the Company in any given reporting period.
 
Plumbing Actions
 
CNA Holdings LLC.LLC (“CNA Holdings”), a US subsidiary of the Company, which included the US business now conducted by the Ticona business whichthat is included in the Advanced Engineered Materials segment, along with Shell Oil Company (“Shell”), E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) and others, has been a defendant in a series of lawsuits, including a number of class actions, alleging that plastics manufactured by these companies that were utilized in the production of plumbing systems for residential property were defective or caused such plumbing systems to fail. Based on, among other things, the findings of outside experts and the successful use of Ticona’s acetal copolymer in similar applications, CNA Holdings does not believe Ticona’s acetal copolymer was defective or caused the plumbing systems to fail. In addition, in many cases CNA Holdings’ potential future exposure may be limited by invocation of the statute of limitations since CNA Holdings ceased selling the resin for use in the plumbing systems in site-built homes during 1986 and in manufactured homes during 1990.limitations.
 
In November 1995, CNA Holdings, DuPont and Shell entered into national class action settlements that called for the replacement of plumbing systems of claimants who have had qualifying leaks, as well as reimbursements for


144


certain leak damage. In connection with such settlement,settlements, the three companies had agreed to fund these replacements and reimbursements up to an aggregate amount of $950 million. As of December 31, 2009,2010, the aggregate funding is $1,109$1,111 million due to additional contributions and funding commitments made primarily by other parties. The time to file claims for the class inCox, et al. v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, et al.,No. 94-0047 (Chancery Ct., Obion County, Tennessee) has now expired. Accordingly, the court ruled the terms of the Cox settlement have been fully performed. The entity previously established to administer all Cox related claims was dissolved on September 24, 2010.
 
During the period between 1995 and 2001, CNA Holdings was also named as a defendant in the following putative class actions:
 
•    Cox, et al. v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, et al.,No. 94-0047 (Chancery Ct., Obion County, Tennessee) (class was certified).
•    
•  Couture, et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al.,No. 200-06-000001-985 (Quebec Superior Court, Canada).
•  Dilday, et al. v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, et al., No. 15187 (Chancery Ct., Weakley County, Tennessee).
•  Furlan v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. C967239 (British Columbia Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, Canada).
•  Gariepy, et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 30781/99 (Ontario Court General Division, Canada) (pending final approval of nationwide Canadian class settlement).
•  Shelter General Insurance Co., et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 16809 (Chancery Ct., Weakley County, Tennessee).
•  St. Croix Ltd., et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 1997/467 (Territorial Ct., St. Croix Division, the US Virgin Islands).
•  Tranter v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 46565/97 (Ontario Court General Division, Canada).
On January 24, 2011 and February 7, 2011, the Chancery Court for Weakley County, Tennessee entered judgments in the Shelter General Insurance Co., et al., v. Shell Oil Company, et al.,No. 200-06-000001-985 (Quebec Superior Court, Canada).
•    16809 and the Dilday, et al. v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, et al., No. 15187, (Chancery Ct., Weakley County, Tennessee).respectively, dismissing with prejudice all claims against the Company.
 
•    Furlan v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. C967239 (British Columbia Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, Canada).
•    Gariepy, et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 30781/99 (Ontario Court General Division, Canada).


126


•    Shelter General Insurance Co., et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 16809 (Chancery Ct., Weakley County, Tennessee).
•    St. Croix Ltd., et al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 1997/467 (Territorial Ct., St. Croix Division,The class actions in Canada are subject to a pending settlement that would result in the US Virgin Islands).
•    Tranter v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 46565/97 (Ontario Court General Division, Canada).
dismissal of those actions. In addition, between 1994 and 2008 CNA Holdings was named as a defendant in numerousnon-class actions filed in Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, Tennessee and Texas, the US Virgin Islands and Canada of which tenthree are currentlyactively pending. In all of these actions, the plaintiffs have sought recovery for alleged damages caused by leaking polybutylene plumbing. Damage amounts have generally not been specified but these casesactions generally do not involve (either individually or in the aggregate) a large number of homes.
 
As of December 31, 2009, the Company hadThe Company’s remaining accruals of $55 million, of which $1 million is included in current Other liabilitiesplumbing action reserves recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. Assheets as of December 31, 2008, the2010 and 2009 are $9 million and $55 million, respectively. The Company had remaining accruals of $64 million, of which $2 million was includedrecorded recoveries and reductions in currentlegal reserves related to plumbing actions (Note 17) to Other liabilities(charges) gains, net in the consolidated balance sheets.statements of operations as follows:
 
             
  Year Ended December 31,
  2010 2009 2008
  (In $ millions)
 
Recoveries  14   1   - 
Legal reserve reductions  45   9   - 
             
Total (Note 17)  59   10   - 
             
The Company reached settlements with CNA Holdings’ insurers specifying their responsibility for these claims. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company received $23 million of insurance proceeds from various CNA Holdings’ insurers as full satisfaction for their responsibility for these claims. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received less than $1 million from insurers. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized a $9 million decrease in legal reserves for plumbing claims due to the Company’s ongoing assessment of the likely outcome of the plumbing actions and the expiration of the statute of limitation.
 
Plumbing Insurance Indemnifications
 
Celanese GmbH entered into agreements with insurance companies related to product liability settlements associated with Celcon®plumbing action claims. These agreements, except those with insolvent insurance companies,


145


require the Company to indemnifyand/or defend these insurance companies in the event that third parties seek additional monies for matters released in these agreements. The indemnifications in these agreements do not provide for time limitations.
 
In certain of the agreements, Celanese GmbH received a fixed settlement amount. The indemnities under these agreements generally are limited to, but in some cases are greater than, the amount received in settlement from the insurance company. The maximum exposure under some of these indemnifications is $95 million. Othermillion, while other settlement agreements with fixed settlement amounts have no stated indemnification limits.
 
There are other agreements whereby the settling insurer agreed to pay a fixed percentage of claims that relate to that insurer’s policies. The Company has provided indemnificationsindemnification to the insurers for amounts paid in excess of the settlement percentage. These indemnifications do not provide for monetary or time limitations.
Sorbates Antitrust Actions
In May 2002, the European Commission informed Hoechst AG (“Hoechst”) of its intent to officially investigate the sorbates industry. In early January 2003, the European Commission served Hoechst, Nutrinova, Inc., a US subsidiary of Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH and previously a wholly owned subsidiary of Hoechst (“Nutrinova”), and a number of competitors of Nutrinova with a statement of objections alleging unlawful, anticompetitive behavior affecting the European sorbates market. In October 2003, the European Commission ruled that Hoechst, Chisso Corporation, Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd. (“Daicel”), The Nippon Synthetic Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. and Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry Ltd. operated a cartel in the European sorbates market between 1979 and 1996. The European Commission imposed a total fine of €138 million on such companies, of which €99 million was assessed against Hoechst and its legal successors. The case against Nutrinova was closed. Pursuant to the Demerger Agreement with Hoechst, Celanese GmbH was assigned the obligation related to the sorbates antitrust matter; however, Hoechst, and its legal successors, agreed to indemnify Celanese GmbH for 80% of any costs Celanese GmbH incurred relative to this matter. Accordingly, Celanese GmbH


127


recognized a receivable from Hoechst from this indemnification. In June 2008, the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fifth Chamber) reduced the fine against Hoechst to €74.25 million and in July 2008, Hoechst paid the €74.25 million fine. In August 2008, the Company paid Hoechst €17 million, including interest of €2 million, in satisfaction of its 20% obligation with respect to the fine.
Based on the advice of external counsel and a review of the existing facts and circumstances relating to the sorbates antitrust matters, including the settlement of the European Union’s investigation, as well as civil claims filed and settled, the Company released its accruals related to the settled sorbates antitrust matters and the indemnification receivables resulting in a gain of $8 million, net, included in Other (charges) gains, net, in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In addition, in 2004 a civil antitrust action styledFreeman Industries LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co., et. al.was filed against Hoechst and Nutrinova, Inc. in the Law Court for Sullivan County in Kingsport, Tennessee. The plaintiff sought monetary damages and other relief for alleged conduct involving the sorbates industry. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims and upon appeal the Supreme Court of Tennessee affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims. In December 2005, the plaintiff lost an attempt to amend its complaint and the entire action was dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff’s counsel subsequently filed a new complaint with new class representatives in the District Court of the District of Tennessee. The Company’s motion to strike the class allegations was granted in April 2008 and the plaintiff’s request to appeal the ruling remains pending.
 
Polyester Staple Antitrust Litigation
 
CNA Holdings, the successor in interest to Hoechst Celanese Corporation (“HCC”), Celanese Americas Corporation and Celanese GmbH (collectively, the “Celanese Entities”) and Hoechst, the former parent of HCC, were named as defendants in two actions (involving 25 individual participants) filed in September 2006 by US purchasers of polyester staple fibers manufactured and sold by HCC. The actions allege that the defendants participated in a conspiracy to fix prices, rig bids and allocate customers of polyester staple sold in the United States. These actions were consolidated in a proceeding by a Multi-District Litigation Panel in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina styledIn re Polyester Staple Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1516. On June 12, 2008 the court dismissed these actions against all Celanese Entities in consideration of a payment by the Company of $107 million. This proceeding related to sales by the polyester staple fibers business which Hoechst sold to KoSa, Inc. in 1998. Accordingly, the impact of this settlement iswas reflected within discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. Theoperations for the year ended December 31, 2008. Prior to December 31, 2008, the Company also previouslyhad entered into tolling arrangements with four other alleged US purchasers of polyester staple fibers manufactured and sold by the Celanese Entities. These purchasers were not included in the settlement and one such company filed suit against the Company in December 2008 in the Western District of North Carolina entitledMilliken & Company v. CNA Holdings, Inc., Celanese Americas Corporation and Hoechst AG(No. 8-CV-00578)8-SV-00578). The Company is actively defending this matter.matter and has filed a motion to dismiss, which is pending with the court.
 
In December 1998, HCC sold its polyester staple business as part of the sale of its Film & Fibers Division(the “1998 Sale”) to KoSa B.V., f/k/a Arteva B.V. and, a subsidiary of Koch Industries, Inc. (“KoSa”), under an asset purchase agreement (“APA”). In March 2001 the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”) commenced an investigation of possible price fixing regarding sales in the US of polyester staple fibers after the period the Celanese Entities were engaged in the polyester staple fiber business. The Celanese Entities were never named in these DOJ actions. As a result of the DOJ action, during August of 2002, Arteva Specialties, S.a.r.l., a subsidiary of KoSa (“Arteva Specialties”), pled guilty to a criminal violation of the Sherman Act relatedrelating to anti-competitive conduct occurring afterfollowing the 1998 sale of theSale. Shortly thereafter, various polyester staple fiber businesscustomers filed approximately 50 civil anti-trust lawsuits against KoSa and paid a fineArteva Specialties, some of $29 million.which alleged anti-competitive conduct prior to the 1998 Sale. In a complaint pending against the Celanese Entities and Hoechstfiled on November 3, 2003 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York,Koch Industries, Inc. et al. v. Hoechst Aktiengellschaft et al.,No. 03-cv-8679, Koch Industries, Inc., KoSa, Arteva Specialties and Arteva Services S.a.r.l. seek damages in excesssought recovery from Hoechst and the Celanese Entities exceeding $371 million. In the complaint, the plaintiffs alleged claims of $371 million that includesfraud, unjust enrichment and indemnification for allretained liabilities and for breach of contractual representations and warranties under the APA. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment in 2009. On July 19, 2010, the court granted in part and denied in part the pending motions. The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims for fraud and unjust enrichment, which also eliminated plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages. The court also held that the plaintiffs cannot recover damages relatedfor liabilities arising out of the operation of the polyester staple business incurred after the 1998 Sale but the plaintiffs can recover damages for the costs of defending and settling civil antitrust actions brought against them to the defendants’extent such damages arose out of the operation of the polyester staple business prior to the 1998 Sale (i.e., “Retained Liabilities” as defined in the APA). The plaintiffs alleged participationthat they had paid approximately $135 million for the costs of settling and defending both pre- and post-1998 Sale civil antitrust actions. The court reserved for trial the calculation and allocation of any damages to which the plaintiffs would be entitled under the relevant sections of the APA. The court also preserved for trial the plaintiffs’ claim for breach of contractual representations and warranties under the APA. On November 3, 2010, the Company participated in and failure to disclose, the alleged conspiracy during due diligence. The Company is actively defending this matter.a


128146


mediation of this matter. Following mediation and during the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the parties settled the case pursuant to a confidential agreement. The settlement is a substantial portion of the amount recognized as Earnings (loss) from operations of discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. On December 21, 2010, the case was dismissed with prejudice.
Other Commercial Actions
In April 2007, Southern Chemical Corporation (“Southern”) filed a petition in the 190th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas styledSouthern Chemical Corporation v. Celanese Ltd. (CauseNo. 2007-25490), seeking declaratory judgment relating to the terms of a multi-year supply contract. The trial court granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment in March 2008 dismissing Southern’s claims. In September 2009, the intermediate Texas appellate court reversed the trial court decision and remanded the case to the trial court. The Texas Supreme Court subsequently declined both parties’ requests that it hear the case. On August 15, 2010, Southern filed a second amended petition adding a claim for breach of contract and seeking equitable damages in an unspecified amount from the Company. Southern amended its complaint again in November 2010. Trial has been set for August 2011. The Company believes that the contractual interpretations set forth by Southern lack merit and is actively defending the matter.
Acetic Acid Patent Infringement Matters
 
On May 9, 1999, Celanese International Corporation filed a private criminal action styledCelanese International Corporation v. China Petrochemical Development Corporationagainst China Petrochemical Development Corporation (“CPDC”) in the Taiwan Kaoshiung District Court alleging that CPDC infringed Celanese International Corporation’s patent covering the manufacture of acetic acid. Celanese International Corporation also filed a supplementary civil brief that, in view of changes in Taiwanese patent laws, was subsequently converted to a civil action alleging damages against CPDC based on a period of infringement of ten years,1991-2000, and based on CPDC’s own data that was reported to the Taiwanese securities and exchange commission. Celanese International Corporation’s patent was held valid by the Taiwanese patent office. On August 31, 2005, the District Court held that CPDC infringed Celanese International Corporation’s acetic acid patent and awarded Celanese International Corporation approximately $28 million (plus interest) for the period of 1995 through 1999. In October 2008, the High Court, on appeal, reversed the District Court’s $28 million award to the Company. The Company appealed to the Superior Court in November 2008, and the court remanded the case to the Intellectual Property Court onin June 4, 2009. On January 16, 2006, the District Court awarded Celanese International Corporation $800,000 (plus interest) for the year 1990. In January 2009, the High Court, on appeal, affirmed the District Court’s award and CPDC appealed on February 5, 2009 to the Supreme Court. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, this case was remanded to the Intellectual Property Court. In August 2010, the Intellectual Property Court ruled in CPDC’s favor and Celanese filed an appeal to the Supreme Court. On June 29, 2007, the District Court awarded Celanese International Corporation $60 million (plus interest) for the period of 2000 through 2005. CPDC appealed this ruling and onin July 21, 2009, the High Court ruled in CPDC’s favor. The Company appealed to the Supreme Court and in December 2009, the case was remanded to the Intellectual Property Court.
 
Workers Compensation Claims
The Company has been provided with notices of claims filed with the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission and the North Carolina Industrial Commission. The notices of claims identify various alleged injuries to current and former employees arising from alleged exposure to undefined chemicals at current and former plant sites in South Carolina and North Carolina. As of December 31, 2010, there were 1,350 claims pending. The Company has reserves for defense costs related to these matters.


147


Asbestos Claims
As
The Company and several of December 31, 2009, Celanese Ltd. and/or CNA Holdings, Inc., bothits US subsidiaries of the Company, are defendants in approximately 526 asbestos cases. During the year ended December 31, 2009, 56 new cases were filed against the Company, 90 cases were resolved, and 12010, asbestos case was added after further analysis by outside counsel. activity is as follows:
Asbestos Cases
As of December 31, 2009526 
Case adjustments
New cases filed41 
Resolved cases(70)
As of December 31, 2010499 
Because many of these cases involve numerous plaintiffs, the Company is subject to claims significantly in excess of the number of actual cases. The Company has reserves for defense costs related to claims arising from these matters. The Company believes that there is no material exposure related to these matters.
 
Award Proceedings in relation to Domination Agreement and Squeeze-Out
 
On October 1, 2004, a Domination Agreement between Celanese GmbH and the Purchaser became operative. When theCompany’s subsidiary, BCP Holdings GmbH (“BCP Holdings”), a German limited liability company, entered into a Domination Agreement became operative,pursuant to which the PurchaserBCP Holdings became obligated to offer to acquire all outstanding Celanese GmbH shares from the minority shareholders of Celanese GmbH in return for payment of fair cash compensation.compensation (the “Purchaser Offer”). The amount of this fair cash compensation was determined to be €41.92 per share plus interest, in accordance with applicable German law. Until the Squeeze-Out was registered in the commercial register in Germany on December 22, 2006, anyAll minority shareholdershareholders who elected not to sell itstheir shares to the BCP Holdings under the Purchaser wasOffer were entitled to remain a shareholdershareholders of Celanese GmbH and to receive from the PurchaserBCP Holdings a gross guaranteed annual payment on its shares of €3.27 per Celanese GmbH share less certain corporate taxes in lieu of any dividend.
 
The Domination Agreement was terminated by the Purchaser in the ordinary course of business effective December 31, 2009. The Company’s subsidiaries, CIH and Celanese US, have each agreed to provide the Purchaser with financing to strengthen the Purchaser’s ability to fulfill its obligations under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement and to ensure that the Purchaser will perform all of its obligations under, or in connection with, the Domination Agreement when such obligations become due, including, without limitation, the obligation to compensate Celanese GmbH for any statutory annual loss incurred by Celanese GmbH during the term of the Domination Agreement. If CIHand/or Celanese US are obligated to make payments under such guarantees or other security to the Purchaser, the Company may not have sufficient funds for payments on its indebtedness when due. The Company has not had to compensate Celanese GmbH for an annual loss for any period during which the Domination Agreement has been in effect. Due to the termination of the Domination Agreement there will be no obligation by the Purchaser to compensate Celanese GmbH for any losses incurred after December 31, 2009.


129


Award Proceedings in relation to Domination Agreement and Squeeze Out
The amounts of the fair cash compensation and of the guaranteed annual payment offered under the Domination Agreement as well as the Squeeze-Out compensation are under court review in two separate special award proceedings. The amounts of the fair cash compensation and of the guaranteed annual payment offered under the Domination Agreement may be increased in special award proceedings initiated by minority shareholders, which may further reduce the funds the Purchaser can otherwise make available to the Company. As of March 30, 2005, several minority shareholders of Celanese GmbH had initiated special award proceedings seeking the court’s review of the amounts of the fair cash compensation and of the guaranteed annual payment offered in the Purchaser Offer under the Domination Agreement. In the Purchaser Offer, 145,387 shares were tendered at the fair cash compensation of €41.92, and 924,078 shares initially remained outstanding and were entitled to the guaranteed annual payment under the Domination Agreement. As a result of these proceedings, the amount of the fair cash consideration and the guaranteed annual payment offeredpaid under the Domination Agreement could be increased by the court so that all minority shareholders, including those who have already tendered their shares intoin the mandatory offer and have receivedPurchaser Offer for the fair cash compensation, could claim the respective higher amounts. The court dismissed all of these proceedings in March 2005 on the grounds of inadmissibility. Thirty-three plaintiffs appealed the dismissal, and in January 2006, twenty-three of these appeals were granted by the court. They were remanded back to the court of first instance, where the valuation will be further reviewed. On December 12, 2006, the court of first instance appointed an expert to help determineassist the court in determining the value of Celanese GmbH. In
On May 30, 2006 the first quartermajority shareholder of 2007, certainCelanese GmbH adopted a squeeze-out resolution under which all outstanding shares held by minority shareholders that receivedshould be transferred to BCP Holdings for a fair cash compensation of €66.99 per share as fair cash compensation also filed award(the “Squeeze-Out”). This shareholder resolution was challenged by shareholders but the Squeeze-Out became effective after the disputes were settled on December 22, 2006. Award proceedings challenging the amount they received as fair cash compensation.
The Company received applications for the commencement of award proceedingswere subsequently filed by 79 shareholders against the PurchaserBCP Holdings with the Frankfurt District Court requesting the court to set a higher amount for the Squeeze-Out compensation. The motions are based on various alleged shortcomings
Pursuant to a settlement agreement between BCP Holdings and mistakes in the valuation ofcertain former Celanese GmbH done for purposes of the Squeeze-Out. On May 11, 2007,shareholders, if the court of first instance appointed a common representative for those shareholders that have not filed an application on their own.
Should the court setsets a higher value for the fair cash compensation or the guaranteed payment under the Purchaser Offer or the Squeeze-Out compensation, former Celanese GmbH shareholders who ceased to be shareholders of Celanese GmbH due to the Squeeze-Out arewill be entitled pursuant to a settlement agreement between the Purchaser and certain former Celanese GmbH shareholders, to claim for their shares the higher of the compensation amounts determined by the court in these different proceedings.proceedings related to the Purchaser Offer and the Squeeze-Out. If the fair cash compensation determined by the court is higher than the Squeeze-Out compensation of € 66.99, then 1,069,465 shares will be entitled to an adjustment. If the court confirms the value of the fair cash compensation under the Domination Agreement but determines a higher value for the Squeeze-Out compensation, 924,078 shares


148


would be entitled to an adjustment. Payments already received by these shareholders already received as compensation for their shares will be offset so that those shareholderspersons who ceased to be shareholders of Celanese GmbH due to the Squeeze-Out are not entitled to more than the higher of the amount set in the two court proceedings.
 
Guarantees
 
The Company has agreed to guarantee or indemnify third parties for environmental and other liabilities pursuant to a variety of agreements, including asset and business divestiture agreements, leases, settlement agreements and various agreements with affiliated companies. Although many of these obligations contain monetaryand/or time limitations, others do not provide such limitations.
 
As indemnification obligations often depend on the occurrence of unpredictable future events, the future costs associated with them cannot be determined at this time.
 
The Company has accrued for all probable and reasonably estimable losses associated with all known matters or claims that have been brought to its attention. These known obligations include the following:
 
• Demerger Obligations
 
TheIn connection with the Hoechst demerger, the Company has obligationsagreed to indemnify Hoechst, and its legal successors, for various liabilities under the Demerger Agreement, including for environmental liabilities associated with contamination arising under 19 divestiture agreements entered into by Hoechst prior to the demerger.
 
The Company’s obligation to indemnify Hoechst, and its legal successors, for environmental liabilities associated with contamination arising under these 19 divestiture agreements is subject to the following thresholds:
 
•    The Company will indemnify Hoechst, and its legal successors, against those liabilities up to €250 million;


130


•    Hoechst, and its legal successors, will bear those liabilities exceeding €250 million, however the Company will reimburse Hoechst, and its legal successors, for one-third of those liabilities for amounts that exceed €750 million in the aggregate.
•  The Company will indemnify Hoechst, and its legal successors, against those liabilities up to €250 million;
•  Hoechst, and its legal successors, will bear those liabilities exceeding €250 million; provided, however, that the Company will reimburse Hoechst, and its legal successors, for one-third of liabilities exceeding €750 million in the aggregate.
 
The aggregate maximum amount of environmental indemnifications under the remaining divestiture agreements that provide for monetary limits is approximately €750 million. Three of the divestiture agreements do not provide for monetary limits. Cumulative payments under the divestiture agreements are as follows:
         
  As of December 31,
  2010 2009
  (In $ millions)
 
Total         54          51 
 
Based on the estimate of the probability of loss under this indemnification, the Company had reserves of $32 million and $27$36 million as of December 31, 20092010 and 2008, respectively,2009 for this contingency. Where the Company is unable to reasonably determine the probability of loss or estimate such loss under an indemnification, the Company has not recognized any related liabilities.
 
The Company has also undertaken in the Demerger Agreement to indemnify Hoechst and its legal successors for (i) one-third of any and all liabilities that result from Hoechst being held as the responsible party pursuant to public law or current or future environmental law or by third parties pursuant to private or public law relates to contamination and (ii) liabilities that Hoechst is required to discharge, including tax liabilities, which are associated with businesses that were included in the demerger but were not demerged due to legal restrictions on the transfers of such items. These indemnities do not provide for any monetary or time limitations. The Company has not provided for any significant reserves associated with this indemnification as it is not probable or estimable. The Company has not made any payments to Hoechst orand its legal successors of less than $1 million and $0 million during the years ended December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively, in connection with this indemnification.


149


• Divestiture Obligations
• Divestiture Obligations
 
The Company and its predecessor companies agreed to indemnify third-party purchasers of former businesses and assets for various pre-closing conditions, as well as for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants. Such liabilities also include environmental liability, product liability, antitrust and other liabilities. These indemnifications and guarantees represent standard contractual terms associated with typical divestiture agreements and, other than environmental liabilities, the Company does not believe that they expose the Company to any significant risk. As of December 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, the Company hashad reserves in the aggregate of $32$26 million and $33$28 million, respectively, for these matters.
 
The Company has divested numerous businesses, investments and facilities through agreements containing indemnifications or guarantees to the purchasers. Many of the obligations contain monetaryand/or time limitations, ranging from one year to thirty years. The aggregate amount of guarantees provided for under these agreements is approximately $1.9 billion$205 million as of December 31, 2009.2010. Other agreements do not provide for any monetary or time limitations.
 
Purchase Obligations
• Purchase Obligations
 
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into commitments to purchase goods and services over a fixed period of time. The Company maintains a number of“take-or-pay” contracts for purchases of raw materials, utilities and utilities.other services. As of December 31, 2009,2010, there were outstanding future commitments of $1,626 million$1.6 billion undertake-or-pay contracts. The Company recognized $17$3 million of losses related totake-or-pay contract termination costs for the year ended December 31, 20092010 related to the Company’s Pardies, France Project“Project of Closure (seeClosure” (Note 4 and Note 18)17). The Company does not expect to incur any material losses undertake-or-pay contractual arrangements unrelated to the Pardies, France Project of Closure.arrangements. Additionally, as of December 31, 2009,2010, there were other outstanding commitments of $713$308 million representing maintenance and service agreements, energy and utility agreements, consulting contracts and software agreements.


131


During March 2010, the Company successfully completed an amended raw material purchase agreement with a supplier who had filed for bankruptcy. Under the original contract, the Company made advance payments in exchange for preferential pricing on certain volumes of material purchases over the life of the contract. The cancellation of the original contract and the terms of the subsequent amendment resulted in the Company accelerating amortization on the unamortized prepayment balance of $22 million during the year ended December 31, 2010. The accelerated amortization was recorded to Cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations as follows: $20 million was recorded in the Acetyl Intermediates segment and $2 million was recorded in the Advanced Engineered Materials segment.
 
25.24. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
 
The following table represents supplementalSupplemental cash flow information for cash and non-cash activities:activities is as follows:
 
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008 
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions) 
Taxes, net of refunds       17        98        181        135        17        98 
Interest, net of amounts capitalized  208   259   414(1)  186   208   259 
Noncash investing and financing activities                        
Fair value adjustment to securities available for sale, net of tax  (3)  (25)  17   (2)  (3)  (25)
Capital lease obligations  38   103   80   33   38   103 
Accrued capital expenditures  (9)  (7)  18   21   (9)  (7)
Asset retirement obligations  30   8   4   25   30   8 
Accrued Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation costs  22   17   19   (7)  22   17 


150


 
25. Segment Information
(1)Amount includes premiums paid on early redemption of debt and related issuance costs, net of amounts capitalized, of $217 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
26. Business and Geographical Segments
 
Business Segments
 
The Company operates through the following business segments:
 
• Advanced Engineered Materials
• Advanced Engineered Materials
 
The Company’s Advanced Engineered Materials segment develops, produces and supplies a broad portfolio of high performance technicalspecialty polymers for application in automotive, medical and electronics products, as well as other consumer and industrial applications. The Company and its strategic affiliates are a leading participant in the global technicalspecialty polymers industry. The primary products of Advanced Engineered Materials are used in a broad range of products including automotive components, medical devices, electronics, appliances, industrial applications, battery separators, conveyor belts, filtration equipment, coatings, medical devices, electrical and electronics.
 
• Consumer SpecialtiesEffective April 1, 2010, the Company moved its investment in its Ibn Sina affiliate from its Acetyl Intermediates segment to its Advanced Engineered Materials segment to reflect a change in the affiliate’s business dynamics and growth opportunities as a result of the future construction of the POM facility (Note 4). The Company has retrospectively adjusted its reportable segments for prior periods to conform to the current year presentation.
• Consumer Specialties
 
The Company’s Consumer Specialties segment consists of the Acetate Products and Nutrinova businesses. The Acetate Products business primarily produces and supplies acetate tow, which is used in the production of filter products. The Company also produces acetate flake which is processed into acetate fiber in the form of a tow band. The Company’Company’s Nutrinova business produces and sells Sunett®, a high intensity sweetener, and food protection ingredients, such as sorbates, for the food, beverage and pharmaceuticals industries.
 
• Industrial Specialties
• Industrial Specialties
 
The Company’s Industrial Specialties segment includes the Emulsions PVOH and EVA Performance Polymers businesses. The Company’s Emulsions business is a global leader which produces a broad product portfolio, specializing in vinyl acetate ethylene emulsions, and is a recognized authority on low VOC (volatile organic compounds), an environmentally-friendly technology. As a global leader, the Company’s PVOH business produced a broad portfolio of performance PVOH chemicals engineered to meet specific customer requirements. The Company’s emulsions and PVOH products are used in a wide array of applications including paints and coatings, adhesives, building and construction, glass fiber, textiles and paper. EVA Performance Polymers business offers a complete line of low-density polyethylene and specialty ethylene vinyl acetate resins and compounds. EVA Performance Polymers’ products are used in many applications including flexible packaging films, lamination film products, hot melt adhesives, medical tubing and devices, automotive carpet and solar cell encapsulation films.
 
In July 2009, the Company completed the sale of its PVOH business to Sekisui (Note 4).


132


 
• Acetyl Intermediates
• Acetyl Intermediates
 
The Company’s Acetyl Intermediates segment produces and supplies acetyl products, including acetic acid, VAM, acetic anhydride and acetate esters. These products are generally used as starting materials for colorants, paints, adhesives, coatings, medicines and more. Other chemicals produced in this business segment are organic solvents and intermediates for pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical products.
 
• Other ActivitiesIn November 2010, the Company announced its newly developed advanced technology to produce ethanol. This innovative, new process combines our proprietary and leading acetyl platform with highly advanced manufacturing technology to produce ethanol from hydrocarbon-sourced feedstocks.


151


• Other Activities
 
Other Activities primarily consists of corporate center costs, including financing and administrative activities such as legal, accounting and treasury functions and interest income or expense associated with financing activities of the Company and the captive insurance companies.Captives.
 
The business segment management reporting and controlling systems are based on the same accounting policies as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 2. The Company evaluates performance based on operating profit, net earnings (loss), cash flows and other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with US GAAP.
 
Sales and revenues related to transactions between business segments are generally recorded at values that approximate third-party selling prices.
 
                                                        
 Advanced
              Advanced
             
 Engineered
 Consumer
 Industrial
 Acetyl
 Other
      Engineered
 Consumer
 Industrial
 Acetyl
 Other
     
 Materials Specialties Specialties Intermediates Activities Eliminations Consolidated  Materials Specialties Specialties Intermediates Activities Eliminations Consolidated 
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions) 
Year ended December 31, 2009                            
 Year ended December 31, 2010
  
Net sales       808        1,084(1)       974        2,603(1)       2        (389)       5,082   1,109   1,098 (1)  1,036   3,082 (1)  2   (409)  5,918 
Other (charges) gains, net  (18)  (9)  4   (91)  (22)(3)     (136)  31   (76)  25 (3)  (12)  (14(3)  -   (46)
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  27   1      5   15      48   144   2   -   5   17   -   168 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  62   288   89   144   (342)     241   329   237   89   252   (369)  -   538 
Depreciation and amortization  73   50   51   123   11      308   76 (4)  42   41   117 (4)  11   -   287 
Capital expenditures  27   50   45   36   9      167(2)  52   50   55   49   16   -   222 (2)
Goodwill and intangible assets  385   299   62   346         1,092 
Goodwill and intangible assets, net  423   284   55   264   -   -   1,026 
Total assets  2,211   1,083   740   1,986   2,390      8,410   2,765   998   841   1,909   1,768   -   8,281 
   
Year ended December 31, 2008                            
 Year ended December 31, 2009 - As Adjusted (Note 4)
  
Net sales  1,061   1,155   1,406   3,875(1)  2   (676)  6,823   808   1,084 (1)  974   2,603 (1)  2   (389)  5,082 
Other (charges) gains, net  (29)  (2)  (3)  (78)  4      (108)  (18)  (9)  4 (3)  (91)  (22(3)  -   (136)
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  37         3   14      54   78   1   -   5   15   -   99 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  69   237   47   434   (353)     434   114   288   89   102   (342)  -   251 
Depreciation and amortization  76   53   62   150   9      350   73   50   51   123   11   -   308 
Capital expenditures  55   49   67   86   10      267(2)  27   50   45   36   9   -   167 (2)
Goodwill and intangible assets  398   309   73   363         1,143 
Goodwill and intangible assets, net  385   299   62   346   -   -   1,092 
Total assets  1,867   995   903   2,197   1,204      7,166   2,268   1,083   740   1,985   2,336   -   8,412 
  
 Year ended December 31, 2008 - As Adjusted (Note 4)
  
Net sales  1,061   1,155 (1)  1,406   3,875 (1)  2   (676)  6,823 
Other (charges) gains, net  (29)  (2)  (3)  (78)  4   -   (108)
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  155   -   -   3   14   -   172 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  190   237   47   312   (353)  -   433 
Depreciation and amortization  76   53   62   150   9   -   350 
Capital expenditures  55   49   67   86   10   -   267 (2)
 
 
(1)Includes $389Net sales for Acetyl Intermediates and Consumer Specialties include inter-segment sales of $400 million and $9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010; $383 million and $6 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009; and $676 million and $660$0 million, of intersegment sales eliminated in consolidationrespectively, for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.2008.
 
(2)Excludes expenditures related to the relocation of the Company’s Ticona plant in Kelsterbach (Note 29)28) and includes an increase in accrued capital expenditures of $21 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and a decrease in accrued capital expenditures of $9 million and $7 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively (see Note 25)(Note 24).
 
(3)Includes $7 million and $10 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, of insurance recoveries received from the Company’s captive insurance companies related to the Edmonton, Alberta, Canada facility that eliminates in consolidation.
(4)Includes $2 million for Advanced Engineered Materials and $20 million for Acetyl Intermediates for the accelerated amortization of the unamortized prepayment related to a raw material purchase agreement (Note 23).


133152


                             
  Advanced
                   
  Engineered
  Consumer
  Industrial
  Acetyl
  Other
       
  Materials  Specialties  Specialties  Intermediates  Activities  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) 
 
Year ended December 31, 2007                            
Net sales  1,030   1,111   1,346   3,615(1)  2   (660)  6,444 
Other (charges) gains, net  (4)  (4)  (23)  72   (99)(3)     (58)
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  55   3      6   18      82 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  189   235   28   694   (699)     447 
Depreciation and amortization  69   51   59   106   6      291 
Capital expenditures  59   43   63   130   11      306(2)
(1)Includes $389 million, $676 million and $660 million of intersegment sales eliminated in consolidation for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
(2)Excludes expenditures related to the relocation of the Company’s Ticona plant in Kelsterbach (Note 29) and includes a decrease in accrued capital expenditures of $9 million and $7 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively (see Note 25).
(3)Includes $35 million of insurance recoveries received from the Company’s captive insurance companies related to the Clear Lake, Texas facility (Note 30) that eliminates in consolidation.
 
Geographical Segments
 
Revenues and noncurrent assets are presented based on the location of the business. The following table presents net sales based on the geographic location of the Company’s facilities:facilities are as follows:
 
                        
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008
 (In $ millions) (In $ millions)
Net sales                     
US       1,262        1,719        1,754   1,555   1,262   1,719 
International  3,820   5,104   4,690   4,363   3,820   5,104 
             
Total  5,082   6,823   6,444   5,918   5,082   6,823 
Significant international net sales sources include         
International countries with significant net sales            
Germany  1,733   2,469   2,348   1,950   1,733   2,469 
China  460   393   182   596   460   393 
Singapore  513   783   762   612   513   783 
Belgium  459   478   295   451   459   478 
Canada  173   276   266   277   173   276 
Mexico  277   391   349   267   277   391 

134


The following table presents property,Property, plant and equipment, net based on the geographic location of the Company’s facilities:facilities is as follows:
 
                
 As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2009 2008 2010 2009
 (In $ millions) (In $ millions)
Property, plant and equipment, net              
US            634             733   650   634 
International  2,163   1,737   2,367   2,163 
         
Total  2,797   2,470   3,017   2,797 
Significant international property, plant and equipment, net sources include      
International countries with significant property, plant and equipment, net        
Germany  1,075   682   1,321   1,075 
China  516   493   557   516 
Singapore  98   111   90   98 
Belgium  27   24   30   27 
Canada  131   117   131   131 
Mexico  103   105   109   103 
 
27. Transactions and Relationships with Affiliates and Related Parties
26. Transactions and Relationships with Affiliates and Related Parties
 
The Company is a party to various transactions with affiliated companies. Entities in which the Company has an investment accounted for under the cost or equity method of accounting are considered affiliates; any transactions or balances with such companies are considered affiliate transactions. The following table represents the Company’s transactionsTransactions with affiliates for the periods presented:are as follows:
 
                     
 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007 2010 2009 2008
 (In $ millions) (In $ millions)
Purchases from affiliates(2)
            143             143             126   169   143   143 
Sales to affiliates(1)
  6   36   126   8   6   36 
Interest income from affiliates  1   2   1   1   1   2 
Interest expense to affiliates  1   9   7   -   1   9 


153


(1)Purchases and sales from/to affiliates are accounted for at prices which, in the opinion of the Company, approximate those charged to third-party customers for similar goods or services.
(2)Primarily includes utilities and services purchased from InfraServ Hoechst.
Refer to Note 8 for additional information related to dividends received from affiliates.
 
The following table represents the Company’s balancesBalances with affiliates forrecorded in the periods presented:consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
 
              
 As of December 31, As of December 31,
 2009 2008 2010 2009
 (In $ millions) (In $ millions)
Trade and other receivables from affiliates        —         8   1   - 
Current notes receivable (including interest) from affiliates  12   9   20   12 
Noncurrent notes receivable (including interest) from affiliates  7   9   -   7 
         
Total receivables from affiliates  19   26   21   19 
         
Accounts payable and other liabilities due affiliates  15   18   24   15 
Short-term borrowings from affiliates  85   103   48   85 
         
Total due affiliates  100   121 
Total due to affiliates  72   100 
         
 
The Company has agreements with certain affiliates, primarily InfraServ entities, whereby excess affiliate cash is lent to and managed by the Company, at variable interest rates governed by those agreements.


135154


For the year ended 2007, the Company made payments to the Advisor of $7 million in accordance with the sponsor services agreement dated January 26, 2005, as amended. These payments were related to the sale of the oxo products and derivatives businesses and the acquisition of APL (Note 4).
 
28.27. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
 
                        
                         Year Ended December 31,
 Year Ended December 31,  2010 2009 2008
 2009 2008 2007  Basic Diluted Basic Diluted Basic Diluted
 Basic Diluted Basic Diluted Basic Diluted      As adjusted (Note 4)
 (In $ millions, except for share and per share data)  (In $ millions, except for share and per share data)
Amounts attributable to Celanese Corporation                                                
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  484   484   372   372   336   336   426   426   494   494   371   371 
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  4   4   (90)  (90)  90   90   (49)  (49)  4   4   (90)  (90)
                         
Net earnings (loss)  488   488   282   282   426   426   377   377   498   498   281   281 
Less: cumulative preferred stock                        
dividend  (10)     (10)     (10)   
Less: Cumulative preferred stock dividend  (3)  -   (10)  -   (10)  - 
                         
Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders  478   488   272   282   416   426   374   377   488   498   271   281 
                         
Weighted average shares — basic  143,688,749   143,688,749   148,350,273   148,350,273   154,475,020   154,475,020   154,564,136   154,564,136   143,688,749   143,688,749   148,350,273   148,350,273 
Dilutive stock options      1,167,922       2,559,268       4,344,644       1,828,746       1,167,922       2,559,268 
Dilutive restricted stock units      172,246       504,439       362,130       425,385       172,246       504,439 
Assumed conversion of preferred stock      12,086,604       12,057,893       12,046,203       1,553,925       12,086,604       12,057,893 
                         
Weighted average shares — diluted  143,688,749   157,115,521   148,350,273   163,471,873   154,475,020   171,227,997   154,564,136   158,372,192   143,688,749   157,115,521   148,350,273   163,471,873 
                         
Per share                                                
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  3.30   3.08   2.44   2.28   2.11   1.96   2.73   2.69   3.37   3.14   2.44   2.27 
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  0.03   0.03   (0.61)  (0.55)  0.58   0.53   (0.31)  (0.31)  0.03   0.03   (0.61)  (0.55)
                         
Net earnings (loss)  3.33   3.11   1.83   1.73   2.69   2.49   2.42   2.38   3.40   3.17   1.83   1.72 
                         
 
The following securitiesSecurities that were not included in the computation of diluted net earnings per share as their effect would have been antidilutive:antidilutive are as follows:
 
                        
 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31,
 2009 2008 2007  2010 2009 2008
Stock options       2,433,515        2,298,159        336,133   575,266   2,433,515   2,298,159 
Restricted stock units  302,635   90,625      74,166   302,635   90,625 
             
Total  2,736,150   2,388,784   336,133   649,432   2,736,150   2,388,784 
             
 
29.28. Ticona Kelsterbach Plant Relocation
 
In November 2006, the Company finalized a settlement agreement with the Frankfurt, Germany Airport (“Fraport”) to relocate the Kelsterbach, Germany Ticona business,operations, included in the Advanced Engineered Materials segment, resolving several years of legal disputes related to the planned Fraport expansion. As a result of the settlement, the Company will transition Ticona’s operations from Kelsterbach to the Hoechst Industrial Park in the Rhine Main area in Germany by mid-2011.Germany. Under the original agreement, Fraport agreed to pay Ticonathe Company a total of €670 million over a five-year period to offset the costs associated with the transition of the businessoperations from its current location and the closure of the Kelsterbach plant. The Company subsequently decided to expand the scope of the new production facilities.


155


In February 2009, the Company announced the Fraport supervisory board approved the acceleration of the 2009 and 2010 payments of €200 million and €140 million, respectively, required by the settlement agreement signed in June 2007. In February 2009, the Company received a


136


discounted amount of €322 million ($412 million) under this agreement. In addition, the Company received €59 million ($75 million) in value-added tax from Fraport which was remitted to the tax authorities in April 2009. In June 2008, the Company received €200 million ($311 million) from Fraport under this agreement. Amounts received from Fraport are accounted for as deferred proceeds and are included in noncurrent Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Kelsterbach, Germany Ticona operations are included in the Advanced Engineered Materials segment.
 
Below is aA summary of the financial statement impact associated with the Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation:relocation is as follows:
 
            
     Total From
                 Inception
     Total From
      Through
 Year Ended December 31, Inception Through
  Year Ended December 31, December 31,
 2009 2008 December 31, 2009  2010 2009 2010
 (In $ millions)  (In $ millions)
Proceeds received from Fraport       412        311        749   -   412   749 
Costs expensed  16   12   33   26   16   59 
Costs capitalized  373(1)  202(1)  616   305 (1)  373 (1)  921 
Lease buyout  22 (2)  -   22 
 
 
(1)Includes increasedecrease in accrued capital expenditures of $22 million and $17$7 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20092010, and 2008, respectively.
an increase of $22 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
30. 
(2)Insurance RecoveriesBuyout of building capital lease in anticipation of Kelsterbach relocation.
29. Insurance Recoveries
Due to certain events in October 2008 and subsequent periodic cessations of production of the Company’s specialty polymers products produced at its EVA Performance Polymers facility in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, the Company declared two events of force majeure. During 2009, the Company replaced long-lived assets damaged in October 2008. As a result of these events and subsequent periodic cessation of production, the Company recorded $25 million and $10 million of insurance recoveries during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, in the Company’s Industrial Specialties segment. These amounts were partially offset by $7 million and $10 million, respectively, recorded as a charge by the Company’s Captives included in the Other Activities segment. The net insurance recoveries of $18 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010 consisted of $8 million related to property damage and $10 million related to business interruption. The net insurance recoveries are included in Other (charges) gains, net in the consolidated statements of operations (Note 17).
 
In May 2007, the Company announced that it had an unplanned outage at its Clear Lake, Texas acetic acid facility. At that time, the Company originally expected the outage to last until the end of May. Upon restart of the facility, additional operating issues were identified which necessitated an extension of the outage for further, more extensive repairs. In July 2007, the Company announced that the further repairs were unsuccessful on restart of the unit. All repairs were completed in early August 2007 and normal production capacity resumed. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded $0 million, $6 million and $38 million, respectively, of insurance recoveries from its reinsurers in partial satisfaction of claims that the Company made based on losses resulting from the outage. These insurancesinsurance recoveries are included in Other (charges) gains, net in the consolidated statements of operations (Note 18)17).
30. Consolidating Guarantor Financial Information
 
In October 2008,September 2010, the Company declared force majeure oncompleted the issuance of the Notes (Note 13) by Celanese US (the “Issuer”). The Notes are guaranteed by Celanese Corporation (the “Parent Guarantor”) and substantially all of its specialty polymers products produced atUS subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). For cash management purposes, the Company transfers cash between Parent Guarantor, Issuer, Subsidiary Guarantors and non-guarantors through intercompany financing arrangements or


156


declaration of dividends between the respective parent and its EVA Performance Polymers facility in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada assubsidiaries. The transfer of cash under these activities facilitates the ability of the recipient to make specified third-party payments. As a result, the Company presents such intercompany financing activities and dividends within the category where the ultimate use of certain eventscash to third parties is presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. The consolidating financial statements for the Parent Guarantor, the Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors and subsequent cessation of production. The Company replaced damaged long-lived assets during 2009. Any contingent liabilities associated with the outage may be mitigated by the Company’s insurance policies.non-guarantors are as follows:
 
31. Subsequent Events
CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                               
  Year Ended December 31, 2010 
  Parent
     Subsidiary
  Non-
       
  Guarantor  Issuer  Guarantors  Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) 
Net sales  -    -    2,277    4,570    (929)   5,918  
Cost of sales  -    -    (1,704)   (3,976)   942    (4,738) 
                               
Gross profit  -    -    573    594    13    1,180  
Selling, general and administrative expenses  -    -    (183)   (322)   -    (505) 
Amortization of intangible assets  -    -    (14)   (47)   -    (61) 
Research and development expenses  -    -    (42)   (28)   -    (70) 
Other (charges) gains, net  -    -    68    (114)   -    (46) 
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net  -    -    -    (3)   -    (3) 
Gain (loss) on disposition of businesses and assets, net  -    -    3    5    -    8  
                               
Operating profit  -    -    405    85    13    503  
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  407    551    153    126    (1,069)   168  
Interest expense  -    (173)   (38)   (46)   53    (204) 
Refinancing expense  -    (16)   -    -    -    (16) 
Interest income  -    21    30    9    (53)   7  
Dividend income — cost investments  -    -    -    73    -    73  
Other income (expense), net  (27)   2    (52)   84    -    7  
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  380    385    498    331    (1,056)   538  
Income tax (provision) benefit  (3)   22    (91)   (38)   (2)   (112) 
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  377    407    407    293    (1,058)   426  
                               
Earnings (loss) from operation of discontinued operations  -    -    (78)   (2)   -    (80) 
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations  -    -    2    -    -    2  
Income tax (provision) benefit from discontinued operations  -    -    28    1    -    29  
                               
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  -    -    (48)   (1)   -    (49) 
                               
Net earnings (loss)  377    407    359    292    (1,058)   377  
Net (earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  -    -    -    -    -    -  
                               
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation  377    407    359    292    (1,058)   377  
                               


157


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                               
  Year Ended December 31, 2009 
  Parent
     Subsidiary
  Non-
       
  Guarantor  Issuer  Guarantors  Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) (As Adjusted, Note 4) 
Net sales  -    -    2,046    3,986    (950)   5,082  
Cost of sales  -    -    (1,443)   (3,578)   942    (4,079) 
                               
Gross profit  -    -    603    408    (8)   1,003  
Selling, general and administrative expenses  -    -    (176)   (298)   -    (474) 
Amortization of intangible assets  -    -    (12)   (65)   -    (77) 
Research and development expenses  -    -    (41)   (29)   -    (70) 
Other (charges) gains, net  -    -    (1)   (135)   -    (136) 
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net  -    -    -    2    -    2  
Gain (loss) on disposition of businesses and assets, net  -    -    6    26    10    42  
                               
Operating profit  -    -    379    (91)   2    290  
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  491    523    72    86    (1,073)   99  
Interest expense  -    (169)   (44)   (47)   53    (207) 
Interest income  -    24    27    10    (53)   8  
Dividend income — cost investments  -    -    38    19    -    57  
Other income (expense), net  -    4    (2)   2    -    4  
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  491    382    470    (21)   (1,071)   251  
Income tax (provision) benefit  7    109    276    (149)   -    243  
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  498    491    746    (170)   (1,071)   494  
                               
Earnings (loss) from operation of discontinued operations  -    -    -    6    -    6  
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations  -    -    -    -    -    -  
Income tax (provision) benefit from discontinued operations  -    -    -    (2)   -    (2) 
                               
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  -    -    -    4    -    4  
                               
Net earnings (loss)  498    491    746    (166)   (1,071)   498  
Net (earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  -    -    -    -    -    -  
                               
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation  498    491    746    (166)   (1,071)   498  
                               


158


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                               
  Year Ended December 31, 2008 
  Parent
     Subsidiary
  Non-
       
  Guarantor  Issuer  Guarantors  Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) (As Adjusted, Note 4) 
Net sales  -    -    2,732    5,306    (1,215)   6,823  
Cost of sales  -    -    (2,141)   (4,621)   1,195    (5,567) 
                               
Gross profit  -    -    591    685    (20)   1,256  
Selling, general and administrative expenses  -    -    (250)   (307)   12    (545) 
Amortization of intangible assets  -    -    (12)   (64)   -    (76) 
Research and development expenses  -    -    (46)   (29)   -    (75) 
Other (charges) gains, net  -    -    (32)   (76)   -    (108) 
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net  -    -    -    (4)   -    (4) 
Gain (loss) on disposition of businesses and assets, net  -    -    (6)   (2)   -    (8) 
                               
Operating profit  -    -    245    203    (8)   440  
Equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliates  265    343    217    149    (802)   172  
Interest expense  -    (210)   (88)   (76)   113    (261) 
Interest income  -    57    47    40    (113)   31  
Dividend income — cost investments  -    -    33    15    -    48  
Other income (expense), net  -    1    (9)   11    -    3  
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before tax  265    191    445    342    (810)   433  
Income tax (provision) benefit  16    74    (94)   (62)   3    (63) 
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  281    265    351    280    (807)   370  
                               
Earnings (loss) from operation of discontinued operations  -    -    (118)   (2)   -    (120) 
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations  -    -    -    6    -    6  
Income tax (provision) benefit from discontinued operations  -    -    26    (2)   -    24  
                               
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  -    -    (92)   2    -    (90) 
                               
Net earnings (loss)  281    265    259    282    (807)   280  
Net (earnings) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  -    -    -    1    -    1  
                               
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Celanese Corporation  281    265    259    283    (807)   281  
                               


159


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                               
  As of December 31, 2010 
  Parent
     Subsidiary
  Non-
       
  Guarantor  Issuer  Guarantors  Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) 
ASSETS
                              
Current assets                              
Cash and cash equivalents  -    -    128    612    -    740  
Trade receivables — third party and affiliates  -    -    246    672    (91)   827  
Non-trade receivables  -    10    1,400    515    (1,672)   253  
Inventories  -    -    164    484    (38)   610  
Deferred income taxes  -    25    33    34    -    92  
Marketable securities, at fair value  -    -    77    1    -    78  
Assets held for sale  -    -    9    -    -    9  
Other assets  -    48    33    43    (65)   59  
                               
Total current assets  -    83    2,090    2,361    (1,866)   2,668  
                               
Investments in affiliates  903    3,721    1,413    530    (5,729)   838  
Property, plant and equipment, net  -    -    650    2,367    -    3,017  
Deferred income taxes  -    19    404    20    -    443  
Marketable securities, at fair value  -    -    -    -    -    -  
Other assets  -    614    125    389    (839)   289  
Goodwill  -    -    297    477    -    774  
Intangible assets, net  -    -    79    173    -    252  
                               
Total assets  903    4,437    5,058    6,317    (8,434)   8,281  
                               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                              
Current liabilities                              
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt — third party and affiliates  -    1,227    137    190    (1,326)   228  
Trade payables — third party and affiliates  -    -    249    515    (91)   673  
Other liabilities  -    87    385    544    (420)   596  
Deferred income taxes  -    -    -    28    -    28  
Income taxes payable  (26)   (309)   314    39    (1)   17  
                               
Total current liabilities  (26)   1,005    1,085    1,316    (1,838)   1,542  
                               
Long-term debt  -    2,498    980    346    (834)   2,990  
Deferred income taxes  -    -    -    116    -    116  
Uncertain tax positions  3    17    28    225    -    273  
Benefit obligations  -    -    1,230    129    -    1,359  
Other liabilities  -    14    123    954    (16)   1,075  
Total Celanese Corporation shareholders’ equity  926    903    1,612    3,231    (5,746)   926  
Noncontrolling interests  -    -    -    -    -    -  
                               
Total shareholders’ equity  926    903    1,612    3,231    (5,746)   926  
                               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity  903    4,437    5,058    6,317    (8,434)   8,281  
                               


160


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                               
  As of December 31, 2009 
  Parent
     Subsidiary
  Non-
       
  Guarantor  Issuer  Guarantors  Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) (As Adjusted, Note 4) 
ASSETS
                              
Current assets                              
Cash and cash equivalents  5    -    520    729    -    1,254  
Trade receivables — third party and affiliates  -    -    274    602    (155)   721  
Non-trade receivables  -    13    913    509    (1,173)   262  
Inventories  -    -    148    415    (41)   522  
Deferred income taxes  -    -    32    11    (1)   42  
Marketable securities, at fair value  -    -    2    1    -    3  
Assets held for sale  -    -    -    2    -    2  
Other assets  -    12    25    59    (46)   50  
                               
Total current assets  5    25    1,914    2,328    (1,416)   2,856  
                               
Investments in affiliates  574    3,282    1,316    465    (4,845)   792  
Property, plant and equipment, net  -    -    634    2,163    -    2,797  
Deferred income taxes  12    40    375    57    -    484  
Marketable securities, at fair value  -    -    80    -    -    80  
Other assets  -    614    133    413    (849)   311  
Goodwill  -    -    284    514    -    798  
Intangible assets, net  -    -    60    234    -    294  
                               
Total assets  591    3,961    4,796    6,174    (7,110)   8,412  
                               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                              
Current liabilities                              
Short-term borrowings and current installments of long-term debt — third party and affiliates  -    768    141    230    (897)   242  
Trade payables — third party and affiliates  -    -    261    543    (155)   649  
Other liabilities  -    98    343    486    (316)   611  
Deferred income taxes  -    -    (6)   39    -    33  
Income taxes payable  3    (297)   284    86    (4)   72  
                               
Total current liabilities  3    569    1,023    1,384    (1,372)   1,607  
                               
Long-term debt  -    2,756    989    358    (844)   3,259  
Deferred income taxes  -    -    -    137    -    137  
Uncertain tax positions  2    18    19    190    -    229  
Benefit obligations  -    -    1,167    121    -    1,288  
Other liabilities  -    44    176    1,105    (19)   1,306  
Total Celanese Corporation shareholders’ equity  586    574    1,422    2,879    (4,875)   586  
Noncontrolling interests  -    -    -    -    -    -  
                               
Total shareholders’ equity  586    574    1,422    2,879    (4,875)   586  
                               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity  591    3,961    4,796    6,174    (7,110)   8,412  
                               


161


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                               
  As of December 31, 2010 
  Parent
     Subsidiary
  Non-
       
  Guarantor  Issuer  Guarantors  Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (42)   -    49    445    -    452  
Investing activities from continuing operations                              
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment  -    -    (88)   (113)   -    (201) 
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired  -    -    (46)   -    -    (46) 
Proceeds from sale of businesses and assets, net  -    -    4    22    -    26  
Capital expenditures related to Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation  -    -    -    (312)   -    (312) 
Other, net  -    -    (6)   (21)   -    (27) 
                               
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  -    -    (136)   (424)   -    (560) 
Financing activities from continuing operations                              
Short-term borrowings (repayments), net  -    -    3    (19)   -    (16) 
Proceeds from long-term debt  -    600    -    -    -    600  
Repayments of long-term debt  -    (827)   (2)   (68)   -    (897) 
Refinancing costs  -    (24)   -    -    -    (24) 
Proceeds (repayments) from intercompany financing activities  -    251    (218)   (33)   -    -  
Purchases of treasury stock, including related fees  (48)   -    -    -    -    (48) 
Dividends from subsidiary  86    86    -    -    (172)   -  
Dividends to parent  -    (86)   (86)   -    172    -  
Stock option exercises  14    -    -    -    -    14  
Series A common stock dividends  (28)   -    -    -    -    (28) 
Preferred stock dividends  (3)   -    -    -    -    (3) 
Other, net  16    -    (2)   -    -    14  
                               
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  37    -    (305)   (120)   -    (388) 
Exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents  -    -    -    (18)   -    (18) 
                               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (5)   -    (392)   (117)   -    (514) 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  5    -    520    729    -    1,254  
                               
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period  -    -    128    612    -    740  
                               


162


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                               
  Year Ended December 31, 2009 
  Parent
     Subsidiary
  Non-
       
  Guarantor  Issuer  Guarantors  Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) (As Adjusted, Note 4) 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  -    -    298    298    -    596  
Investing activities from continuing operations                              
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment  -    -    (58)   (118)   -    (176) 
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired  -    -    -    (9)   -    (9) 
Proceeds from sale of businesses and assets, net  -    -    132    39    -    171  
Deferred proceeds on Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation  -    -    -    412    -    412  
Capital expenditures related to Ticona Kelsterbach plant relocation  -    -    -    (351)   -    (351) 
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  -    -    -    15    -    15  
Other, net  -    -    (4)   (27)   -    (31) 
                               
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  -    -    70    (39)   -    31  
Financing activities from continuing operations                              
Short-term borrowings (repayments), net  -    -    (4)   (5)   -    (9) 
Proceeds from long-term debt  -    -    -    -    -    -  
Repayments of long-term debt  -    (28)   (16)   (36)   -    (80) 
Refinancing costs  -    (3)   -    -    -    (3) 
Proceeds (repayments) from intercompany financing activities  -    31    (31)   -    -    -  
Dividends from subsidiary  24    24    4    -    (52)   -  
Dividends to parent  -    (24)   (24)   (4)   52    -  
Stock option exercises  14    -    -    -    -    14  
Series A common stock dividends  (23)   -    -    -    -    (23) 
Preferred stock dividends  (10)   -    -    -    -    (10) 
Other, net  -    -    (1)   -    -    (1) 
                               
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  5    -    (72)   (45)   -    (112) 
Exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents  -    -    -    63    -    63  
                               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  5    -    296    277    -    578  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  -    -    224    452    -    676  
                               
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period  5    -    520    729    -    1,254  
                               


163


CELANESE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                               
  Year Ended December 31, 2008 
  Parent
     Subsidiary
  Non-
       
  Guarantor  Issuer  Guarantors  Guarantors  Eliminations  Consolidated 
  (In $ millions) (As Adjusted, Note 4) 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  7    -    229    350    -    586  
Investing activities from continuing operations                              
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment  -    -    (100)   (174)   -    (274) 
Proceeds from sale of businesses and assets, net  -    -    4    5    -    9  
Deferred proceeds on Ticona                              
Kelsterbach plant relocation  -    -    -    311    -    311  
Capital expenditures related to Ticona plant relocation  -    -    -    (185)   -    (185) 
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  -    -    -    202    -    202  
Purchases of marketable securities  -    -    -    (91)   -    (91) 
Distributions from subsidiary  -    93    -    -    (93)   -  
Distributions to parent  -    -    (93)   -    93    -  
Settlement of cross currency swap agreements  -    (93)   -    -    -    (93) 
Other, net  -    -    (33)   (47)   -    (80) 
                               
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  -    -    (222)   21    -    (201) 
Financing activities from continuing operations                              
Short-term borrowings (repayments), net  -    -    5    (69)   -    (64) 
Proceeds from long-term debt  -    -    -    13    -    13  
Repayments of long-term debt  -    (29)   (1)   (17)   -    (47) 
Proceeds (repayments) from intercompany financing activities  -    29    282    (311)   -    -  
Purchases of treasury stock, including related fees  (378)   -    -    -    -    (378) 
Dividends from subsidiary  359    359    -    -    (718)   -  
Dividends to parent  -    (359)   (359)   -    718    -  
Stock option exercises  18    -    -    -    -    18  
Series A common stock dividends  (24)   -    -    -    -    (24) 
Preferred stock dividends  (10)   -    -    -    -    (10) 
Other, net  (6)   -    (1)   -    -    (7) 
                               
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (41)   -    (74)   (384)   -    (499) 
Exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents  -    -    -    (35)   -    (35) 
                               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (34)   -    (67)   (48)   -    (149) 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  34    -    291    500    -    825  
                               
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period  -    -    224    452    -    676  
                               


164


31. Subsequent Events
 
On January 5, 2010,6, 2011, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.265625 per share on its Preferred Stock amounting to $3 million and a cash dividend of $0.04$0.05 per share on its Series A common stock amounting to $6$8 million. BothThe cash dividends aredividend was for the period from November 2, 20092010 to January 31, 20102011 and werewas paid on February 1, 20102011 to holders of record as of January 15, 2010.18, 2011.
In January 2011, the Company signed letters of intent for projects to construct and operate industrial ethanol production facilities in Nanjing, China, at the Nanjing Chemical Industrial Park, and in Zhuhai, China, at the Gaolan Port Economic Zone. The Company also signed a memorandum of understanding with Wison (China) Holding Co., Ltd., a Chinese synthesis gas supplier, for production of certain feedstocks used in our advanced ethanol production process.
 
On January 24, 2011 and February 1, 2010,7, 2011, the Company announced it would elect to redeem all of the Company’s 9,600,000 outstanding shares of its Preferred Stock on February 22, 2010 (“Redemption Date”). On that date, each of the Preferred Stock will be redeemedChancery Court for a number of shares of the Company’s Series A common stock equal to the redemption price ($25.06) divided by 97.5% of the average closing price of the Company’s Series A common stock for the 10 trading days ending on the fifth trading day prior to February 22, 2010.
Holders of the Preferred Stock also have the right to convert their shares at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February 19, 2010, the business day immediately preceding the Redemption Date. Holders who want to convert their shares of Preferred Stock must satisfy all of the requirements as definedWeakley County, Tennessee entered judgments in the Certificate of Designations prior to 5:00 p.m.Shelter General Insurance Co., New York City time, in order to effect conversion of their shares of Preferred Stock. Each share of Preferred Stock is convertible into 1.2600 shares ofet al. v. Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 16809 and the Company’s Series A common stock, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances as set forth inDilday, et al. v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, et al. No. 15187, respectively, dismissing with prejudice all claims against the Certificates of Designations.
Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date of issuance, February 12, 2010.Company.


137165


INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 
Exhibits will be furnished upon request for a nominal fee, limited to reasonable expenses.
 
     
Exhibit
  
Number Description
 
 3.1** Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
 3.2 Third Amended and Restated By-laws, effective as of October 23, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on October 29, 2008).
 3.3** Certificate of Designations of 4.25% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock.
 4.1 Form of certificate of Series A Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on FormS-1 (File No. 333-120187) filed with the SEC on January 13, 2005).
 4.2 Form of certificate of 4.25% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on FormS-1 (File No. 333-120187) filed with the SEC on January 13, 2005).
 4.3 Indenture, dated September 24, 2010, by and among Celanese US Holdings LLC, the guarantors party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2010).
 10.1 Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 24, 2010, among Celanese US Holdings LLC, the guarantors party thereto, and the initial purchasers listed therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2010).
 10.2† Credit Agreement, dated April 2, 2007, among Celanese Holdings LLC, Celanese US Holdings LLC, the subsidiaries of Celanese US Holdings LLC from time to time party thereto as borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral agent, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation as syndication agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Bank of America, N.A., Citibank NA, and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, as co-documentation agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on May 28, 2010).
 10.3 First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated June 30, 2009, among Celanese US Holdings LLC and the Majority Lenders under the Revolving Facility (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2009).
 10.4 Amendment Agreement, dated September 29, 2010 among Celanese Corporation, Celanese US Holdings LLC, certain subsidiaries of Celanese US Holdings LLC, the lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral agent, and Deutsche Bank Securities LLC and Banc of Americas Securities LLC as joint lead arrangers and joint book runners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2010).
 10.5 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 29, 2010 among Celanese Corporation, Celanese US Holdings LLC, the subsidiaries of Celanese US Holdings LLC from time to time party thereto as borrowers and guarantors, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, Deutsche Bank Securities LLC and Banc of Americas Securities LLC as joint lead arrangers and joint book runners, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as Co-Documentation Agents, the other lenders party thereto, and certain other agents for such lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2010).
 10.6 Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated April 2, 2007, by and among Celanese Holdings LLC, Celanese US Holdings LLC, certain subsidiaries of Celanese US Holdings LLC and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 28, 2010).
 10.7 Celanese Corporation 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-120187) filed with the SEC on January 3, 2005).
 10.7(a) Amendment to Celanese Corporation 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007).


166


     
Exhibit
  
Number Description
 
 10.7(b) Form of 2007 Deferral Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007).
 10.8** Celanese Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
 10.8(a)** Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for employees) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient.
 10.8(b) Form of Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for employees) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(b) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 12, 2010).
 10.8(c) Form of Amendment Two to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for executive officers) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
 10.8(d)** Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for non-employee directors) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient.
 10.8(e) Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 28, 2010).
 10.8(f) Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for non-employee directors) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 27, 2007).
 10.8(g) Form of Performance-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
 10.8(h) Performance Unit Award Agreement, dated December 11, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and David N. Weidman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
 10.8(i) Form of Time-Vesting Cash Award Agreement (for employees) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between the Company and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
 10.9 Celanese Corporation 2008 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 29, 2008).
 10.9(a) Amendment Number One to Celanese Corporation 2008 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on April 23, 2009).
 10.10 Celanese Corporation 2009 Global Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on April 23, 2009).
 10.10(a) Form of Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
 10.10(b) Form of Performance-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
 10.10(c) Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).

167


     
Exhibit
  
Number Description
 
 10.10(d) Form of Long-Term Incentive Cash Award Agreement, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between the Company and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
 10.10(e) Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated April 23, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Gjon N. Nivica, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
 10.10(f) Form of Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for non-employee directors) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
 10.10(g) Form of Performance-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement ) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 13, 2010).
 10.10(h) Form of Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 13, 2010).
 10.10(i) Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 13, 2010).
 10.11 Celanese Corporation 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 23, 2009).
 10.12 Executive Severance Benefits Plan, dated July 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 27, 2010).
 10.13* Summary of pension benefits for David N. Weidman (updated to include revisions effective after the summary was first filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2005).
 10.14 Compensation Letter Agreement, dated March 27, 2007 between Celanese Corporation and Jim Alder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2008).
 10.15 Offer Letter, dated February 25, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Gjon N. Nivica, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on April 28, 2009).
 10.16† Offer Letter, dated November 18, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Jacquelyn H. Wolf (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 28, 2010).
 10.17 Agreement and General Release, dated March 28, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and William P. Antonace (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 22, 2008).
 10.18 Agreement and General Release, dated September 25, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and Curtis S. Shaw (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 22, 2008).
 10.19 Agreement and General Release, dated March 5, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and John J. Gallagher, III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2009).
 10.20 Restated Agreement and General Release, dated June 3, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Miguel A. Desdin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 28, 2010).
 10.21 Agreement and General Release, dated August 3, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and John A. O’Dwyer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 27, 2009).

168


     
Exhibit
  
Number Description
 
 10.22 Agreement and General Release, dated November 16, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Michael L. Summers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 12, 2010).
 10.23 Agreement and General Release, dated April 23, 2010, between Celanese Corporation and Sandra Beach Lin (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2010).
 10.24 Change in Control Agreement, dated April 1, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and David N. Weidman, together with a schedule identifying other substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its name executive officers identified thereon and identifying the material differences between each of those agreements and the filed Changed of Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2008).
 10.25 Change in Control Agreement, dated April 1, 2008 between Celanese Corporation and Sandra Beach Lin, together with a schedule identifying other substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its executive officers identified thereon and identifying the material differences between each of those agreements and the filed Change of Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on April 23, 2008).
 10.26 Change in Control Agreement, dated May 1, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and Christopher W. Jensen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 23, 2008).
 10.27 Form of Change in Control Agreement between Celanese Corporation and participant, together with a schedule of substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and the individuals identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2010).
 10.28 Form of Long-Term Incentive Claw-Back Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
 10.29* Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation
 10.30** Share Purchase and Transfer Agreement and Settlement Agreement, dated August 19, 2005 between Celanese Europe Holding GmbH & Co. KG, as purchaser, and Paulson & Co. Inc., and Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder Advisers, LLC, each on behalf of its own and with respect to shares owned by the investment funds and separate accounts managed by it, as the sellers.
 10.31 Translation of Letter of Intent, dated November 29, 2006, among Celanese AG, Ticona GmbH and Fraport AG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 29, 2006).
 10.32† Purchase Agreement dated as of December 12, 2006 by and among Celanese Ltd. and certain of its affiliates named therein and Advent Oxo (Cayman) Limited, Oxo Titan US Corporation, Drachenfelssee 520. V V GMBH and Drachenfelssee 521. V V GMBH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report onForm 10-K filed on February 21, 2007).
 10.32(a) First Amendment to Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2007, by and among Advent Oxea Cayman Ltd., Oxea Corporation, Drachenfelssee 520. V V GmbH, Drachenfelssee 521. V V GmbH, Celanese Ltd., Ticona Polymers Inc. and Celanese Chemicals Europe GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 9, 2007).
 10.32(b) Second Amendment to Purchase Agreement effective as of July 1, 2007 by and among Advent Oxea Cayman Ltd., Oxea Corporation, Oxea Holdings GmbH, Oxea Deutschland GmbH, Oxea Bishop, LLC, Oxea Japan KK, Oxea UK Ltd., Celanese Ltd., and Celanese Chemicals Europe GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 24, 2007).
 21.1* List of subsidiaries of Celanese Corporation
 23.1* Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of Celanese Corporation, KPMG LLP
 23.2* Consent of Independent Auditors of CTE Petrochemicals Company, Deloitte & Touche LLP

169


   
Exhibit
  
Number Description
 
 23
3.1.3* Second Amended and Restated CertificateConsent of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2005).Independent Auditors of National Methanol Company, Deloitte & Touche Bakr Abulkhair & Co.
 31
3.2Third Amended and Restated By-laws, effective as of October 23, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 29, 2008).
3.3Certificate of Designations of 4.25% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2005).
4.1Form of certificate of Series A Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-120187) filed with the SEC on January 13, 2005).
4.2Form of certificate of 4.25% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-120187) filed with the SEC on January 13, 2005).
10.1Credit Agreement, dated April 2, 2007, among Celanese Holdings LLC, Celanese US Holdings LLC, the subsidiaries of Celanese US Holdings LLC from time to time party thereto as borrowers, the Lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent and as collateral agent, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation as syndication agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Bank of America, N.A., Citibank NA, and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, as co-documentation agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 5, 2007).
10.2First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated June 30, 2009, among Celanese US Holdings LLC and the Majority Lenders under the Revolving Facility (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2009).
10.3Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated April 2, 2007, by and among Celanese Holdings LLC, Celanese US Holdings LLC, certain subsidiaries of Celanese US Holdings LLC and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 5, 2007).
10.4Celanese Corporation 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-120187) filed with the SEC on January 3, 2005).
10.4(a)Amendment to Celanese Corporation 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007).
10.4(b)Form of 2007 Deferral Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007).
10.5Celanese Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2005).
10.5(a)Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for employees) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2005).


138


10.5(b)*Form of Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for employees) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient.
10.5(c)Form of Amendment Two to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for executive officers) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
10.5(d)Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (for non-employee directors) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 28, 2005).
10.5(e)Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007).
10.5(f)Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for non-employee directors) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 27, 2007).
10.5(g)Form of Performance-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
10.5(h)Performance Unit Award Agreement, dated December 11, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and David N. Weidman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
10.5(i)Form of Time-Vesting Cash Award Agreement (for employees) between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between the Company and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
10.6Celanese Corporation 2008 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 29, 2008).
10.6(a)Amendment Number One to Celanese Corporation 2008 Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on April 23, 2009).
10.7Celanese Corporation 2009 Global Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on April 23, 2009).
10.7(a)Form of Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
10.7(b)Form of Performance-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
10.7(c)Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).

139


10.7(d)Form of Long-Term Incentive Cash Award Agreement, together with a schedule identifying substantially identical agreements between the Company and each of its executive officers identified thereon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
10.7(e)Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated April 23, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Gjon N. Nivica, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
10.8Celanese Corporation 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 23, 2009).
10.9Summary of pension benefits for David N. Weidman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2005).
10.10Offer Letter Agreement, dated June 27, 2007, between Celanese Corporation and Sandra Beach Lin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 27, 2007).
10.11Compensation Letter Agreement, dated March 27, 2007 between Celanese Corporation and Jim Alder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2008
10.12Offer Letter, dated February 25, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Gjon N. Nivica, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on April 28, 2009).
10.13*Offer Letter, dated November 18, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Jacquelyn Wolf.
10.14Agreement and General Release, dated March 28, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and William P. Antonace (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 22, 2008).
10.15Agreement and General Release, dated September 25, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and Curtis S. Shaw (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 22, 2008).
10.16Agreement and General Release, dated March 5, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and John J. Gallagher, III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2009).
10.17Restated Agreement and General Release, dated June 3, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Miguel A. Desdin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2009).
10.18Agreement and General Release, dated August 3, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and John A. O’Dwyer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 27, 2009).
10.19*Agreement and General Release, dated November 16, 2009, between Celanese Corporation and Michael L. Summers (filed herewith).
10.20Change in Control Agreement, dated April 1, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and David N. Weidman, together with a schedule identifying other substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its name executive officers identified thereon and identifying the material differences between each of those agreements and the filed Changed of Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2008).

140


10.21Change in Control Agreement, dated April 1, 2008 between Celanese Corporation and Sandra Beach Lin, together with a schedule identifying other substantially identical agreements between Celanese Corporation and each of its executive officers identified thereon and identifying the material differences between each of those agreements and the filed Change of Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on April 23, 2008).
10.22Change in Control Agreement, dated May 1, 2008, between Celanese Corporation and Christopher W. Jensen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 23, 2008).
10.23Form of Long-Term Incentive Claw-Back Agreement between Celanese Corporation and award recipient (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2009).
10.24Share Purchase and Transfer Agreement and Settlement Agreement, dated August 19, 2005 between Celanese Europe Holding GmbH & Co. KG, as purchaser, and Paulson & Co. Inc., and Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder Advisers, LLC, each on behalf of its own and with respect to shares owned by the investment funds and separate accounts managed by it, as the sellers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2005).
10.25Translation of Letter of Intent, dated November 29, 2006, among Celanese AG, Ticona GmbH and Fraport AG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 29, 2006).
10.26†Purchase Agreement dated as of December 12, 2006 by and among Celanese Ltd. and certain of its affiliates named therein and Advent Oxo (Cayman) Limited, Oxo Titan US Corporation, Drachenfelssee 520. V V GMBH and Drachenfelssee 521. V V GMBH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report of Form 10-K filed on February 21, 2007).
10.26(a)First Amendment to Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2007, by and among Advent Oxea Cayman Ltd., Oxea Corporation, Drachenfelssee 520. V V GmbH, Drachenfelssee 521. V V GmbH, Celanese Ltd., Ticona Polymers Inc. and Celanese Chemicals Europe GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 9, 2007).
10.26(b)Second Amendment to Purchase Agreement effective as of July 1, 2007 by and among Advent Oxea Cayman Ltd., Oxea Corporation, Oxea Holdings GmbH, Oxea Deutschland GmbH, Oxea Bishop, LLC, Oxea Japan KK, Oxea UK Ltd., Celanese Ltd., and Celanese Chemicals Europe GmbH (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 24, 2007).
21.1*List of subsidiaries of Celanese Corporation
23.1*Report on Financial Statement Schedule and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, KPMG LLP
31.1*.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 31
31.2*.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 32
32.1*.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

141


 32
32.2*.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 99
99.1*.1* Financial Statement schedule regarding ValuationAudited financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and Qualifying Accounts2009 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010 for CTE Petrochemicals Company
 99.2* Audited financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010 for National Methanol Company
101.INS101.INS XBRL Instance Document
 101
101.SCH.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 101
101.CAL.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 101
101.DEF.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 101
101.LAB.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 101
101.PRE.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
*         Filed herewith
**         Refiled herewith solely for the purpose of complying with Item 10(d) ofRegulation S-K.
 
†         Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the SEC underRule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 19034, as amended. The omitted portions of this exhibit have been separately filed with the SEC.
Undertaking Regarding Furnishing Additional Documents
The Company agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon its request, the instruments not filed herewith with respect to the Company’s senior unsecured notes due 2018 that were issued in a private placement conducted pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on September 24, 2010, and which are discussed in Note 13 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.

142170