%

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132016

OR

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 001-14625 (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

0-25087 (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

Maryland (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

Delaware (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

 

53-0085950 (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

52-2095412 (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500 Bethesda, Maryland

 

20817

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

(240) 744-1000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

 

  

Title of Each Class

  

Name of Each Exchange on

Which Registered

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  

Common Stock, $.01 par value (756,740,181(739,251,195

shares outstanding as of February 21, 2014)20, 2017)

  

New York Stock Exchange

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

  

None

  

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  

None

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

  

Units of limited partnership interest (750,325,094(732,232,279 units outstanding as of February 21, 2014)20, 2017)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  

Yes x

  

No ¨

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

  

Yes ¨

  

No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  

Yes ¨

  

No x

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

  

Yes ¨

  

No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  

Yes x

  

No ¨

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

  

Yes x

  

No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  

Yes x

  

No ¨

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

  

Yes x

  

No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

Large accelerated filer

  

x

  

Accelerated filer

  

¨

 

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer

  

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) ¨

  

Smaller reporting company

  

¨

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

Large accelerated filer

  

¨

  

Accelerated filer

  

¨

 

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer

  

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) x

  

Smaller reporting company

  

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

  

Yes ¨

  

No x

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

  

Yes ¨

  

No x

The aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (based on the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange) on June 28, 201330, 2016 was $12,310,903,149.$11,770,575,794.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and delivered to stockholders in connection with its annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 14, 201411, 2017 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 


 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132016 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “Host Inc.” mean Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and references to “Host L.P.” mean Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and its consolidated subsidiaries. We use the terms “we” or “our” or “the company” to refer to Host Inc. and Host L.P. together, unless the context indicates otherwise. We use the term Host Inc. to specifically refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and the term Host L.P. to specifically refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. (and its consolidated subsidiaries) in cases where it is important to distinguish between Host Inc. and Host L.P. Host Inc. owns properties and conducts operations through Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and of which it holds approximately 98.7%99% of the partnership interests (“OP units”) as of December 31, 2013.2016. The remaining approximate 1.3% partnership interests are owned by various unaffiliated limited partners. As the sole general partner of Host L.P., Host Inc. has the exclusive and complete responsibility for Host L.P.’s day-to-day management and control.

We believe combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of Host Inc. and Host L.P. into this single report results in the following benefits:

enhances investors’ understanding of Host Inc. and Host L.P. by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;

enhances investors’ understanding of Host Inc. and Host L.P. by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;

eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined presentation, since a substantial portion of our disclosure applies to both Host Inc. and Host L.P.; and

eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined presentation, since a substantial portion of our disclosure applies to both Host Inc. and Host L.P.; and

creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

Management operates Host Inc. and Host L.P. as one enterprise. The management of Host Inc. consists of the same members who direct the management of Host L.P. The executive officers of Host Inc. are appointed by Host Inc.’s board of directors, but are employed by Host L.P. Host L.P. employs everyone who works for Host Inc. or Host L.P. As general partner with control of Host L.P., Host Inc. consolidates Host L.P. for financial reporting purposes, and Host Inc. does not have significant assets other than its investment in Host L.P. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of Host Inc. and Host L.P. are the same on their respective financial statements.

There are a few differences between Host Inc. and Host L.P., which are reflected in the disclosure in this report. We believe it is important to understand the differences between Host Inc. and Host L.P. in the context of how Host Inc. and Host L.P. operate as an interrelated consolidated company. Host Inc. is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, and its only material asset is its ownership of partnership interests of Host L.P. As a result, Host Inc. does not conduct business itself,itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of Host L.P., and issuing public equity from time to time, the proceeds from which are contributed to Host L.P. in exchange for OP units. Host Inc. itself does not issue any indebtedness and does not guarantee the debt or obligations of Host L.P. Host L.P. holds substantially all of our assets and holds the ownership interests in our joint ventures. Host L.P. conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a limited partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from public equity issuances by Host Inc., Host L.P. generates the capital required by our business through Host L.P.’s operations, by Host L.P.’s direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness, or through the issuance of OP units.

The substantive difference between the filings of Host Inc. and Host L.P. is that Host Inc. is a REIT with public stock, while Host L.P. is a partnership with no publicly traded equity. In the financial statements, this difference primarily is reflected in the equity (or partners’ capital for Host L.P.) section of the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of equity (or partners’ capital) and in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss)(loss) with respect to the manner in which income is allocated to non-controlling interests. Income allocable to the holders of approximately 1.3%1% of the OP units is reflected as income allocable to non-controlling interests at Host Inc. and within net income at Host L.P. Also, earnings per share generally will be slightly less than the earnings per OP unit, as each Host Inc. common share is the equivalent of .97895 OP units (instead of 1 OP unit). Apart from these differences, the financial statements of Host Inc. and Host L.P. are nearly identical.

i


 

To help investors understand the differences between Host Inc. and Host L.P., this report presents the following separate sections or portions of sections for each of Host Inc. and Host L.P.:

Part II Item 5 - Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host Inc. / Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host L.P.;

Part II Item 5 - Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host Inc. / Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host L.P.;

Part II Item 6 - Selected Financial Data;

Part II Item 6 - Selected Financial Data;

Part II Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is combined, except for a separate discussion of material differences, if any, in the liquidity and capital resources between Host Inc. and Host L.P.;

Part II Item 7 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is combined, except for a separate discussion of material differences, if any, in the liquidity and capital resources between Host Inc. and Host L.P.;

Part II Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk is combined, except for separate discussions of material differences, if any, between Host Inc. and Host L.P.; and

Part II Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk is combined, except for separate discussions of material differences, if any, between Host Inc. and Host L.P.; and

Part II Item 8 - Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. While the financial statements themselves are presented separately, the notes to the financial statements generally are combined, except for separate discussions of differences between equity of Host Inc. and capital of Host L.P.

Part II Item 8 - Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. While the financial statements themselves are presented separately, the notes to the financial statements generally are combined, except for separate discussions of differences between equity of Host Inc. and capital of Host L.P.

This report also includes separate Item 9A. Controls and Procedures sections and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of Host Inc. and Host L.P. in order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Host Inc. and the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Host Inc. as the general partner of Host L.P. have made the requisite certifications and that Host Inc. and Host L.P. are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities ExchangeExchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

 

 

 

ii


 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

 

 

 

Page

 

 

 

 

Part I

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Business

1

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

1617

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

3032

Item 2.

Properties

3032

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

3032

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

3032

 

 

 

 

Part II

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host Inc.

3234

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host L.P.

3436

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

3537

 

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

3638

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

3739

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

8483

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

8886

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

137131

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

137131

Item 9B.

Other Information

137131

 

 

 

 

Part III

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

138132

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

138132

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Andand Unitholder Matters

138132

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

138132

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

138132

 

 

 

 

Part IV

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

139133

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

136

 

 

 

iii


 

PART I

Forward Looking Statements

Our disclosure and analysis in this 20132016 Form 10-K and in Host Inc.’s 20132016 Annual Report to stockholders contain some forward-looking statements that set forth anticipated results based on management’s plans and assumptions. From time to time, we also provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public. Such statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events; they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. We have tried, wherever possible, to identify each such statement by using words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “target,” “forecast” and similar expressions in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these forward-looking statements include those relating to future actions, future acquisitions or dispositions, future capital expenditureexpenditures plans, future performance or results of current and anticipated expenses, interest rates, foreign exchange rates or the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings.

We cannot guarantee that any future results discussed in any forward-looking statements will be realized, although we believe that we have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and potentially inaccurate assumptions, including those discussed in Item 1A “Risk Factors.” Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlyingunderlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could differ materially from past results and those results anticipated, estimated or projected. You should bear this in mind as you consider forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make or related subjects in our reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K that we file withwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Also note that, in our risk factors, we provide a cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possibly inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business. These are factors that, individually or in the aggregate, we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from past results and those results anticipated, estimated or projected. We note these factors for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. It is not possible to predict or identify all such risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider the discussion of risk factors to be a complete discussion of all of the potential risks or uncertainties that could affect our business.

Item 1.

Business

Host Inc. was incorporated as a Maryland corporation in 1998 and operates as a self-managed and self-administered REIT. Host Inc. owns properties and conducts operations through Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and inof which it holds approximately 98.7%99% of the partnership interests (“OP units”) as of December 31, 2013.2016. The remaining partnership interests are owned by various unaffiliated limited partners. Host Inc. has the exclusive and complete responsibility for Host L.P.’s day-to-dayday-to-day management and control.

As of February 14, 2014,20, 2017, our consolidated lodging portfolio consists of 11496 primarily luxury and upper-upscale hotels containing approximately 60,00053,500 rooms, with the majority located in the United States, and with 157 of the properties located outside of the U.S. in Australia, Brazil, Canada New Zealand, Chile, Australia, Mexico and Brazil. We also are developing two hotels in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Mexico. In addition, we own non-controlling interests in two international joint ventures: approximately a 33% interest in a joint ventureventure in Europe, which owns 1910 luxury and upper upscaleupper-upscale hotels with approximately 6,4003,900 rooms in Belgium, France, Italy,Germany, Spain, TheSweden, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, Belgium, Poland, Germany and Sweden;Kingdom; and a 9% indirect interest, through joint ventureventures, in Asia/Pacific, which owns one upscale hotel in Australia and minority interests in twofive operating hotels one upscale and one midscale, in India and five additionaltwo hotels in India currently under development.the final stages of completion in India. We also hold non-controlling investments in the 255-room Hyatt Place Nashville Downtown in Tennessee, a 131–unit vacation ownership project under development adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa and the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown in which we sold an 89% ownership interest in January 2014.

The Lodging Industry

The lodging industry in the United States consists of private and public entities that operate in an extremely diversified market under a variety of brand names. The lodging industry has several key participants:

Owners—own the hotel and typically enter into an agreement for an independent third party to manage the hotel. These properties may be branded and operated under the manager’s brand or branded under a franchise agreement and operated by the franchisee or by an independent hotel manager. The properties also may be operated as an independent hotel by an independent hotel manager.

Owner/Managers—own the hotel and operate the property with their own management team. These properties may be branded under a franchise agreement, operated as an independent hotel or operated under the owner’s brand. We are prohibited from operating and managingthree domestic hotels under applicable REIT rules.

1


Franchisors—own a brand or brands and strive to grow their revenues by expanding the number of hotels in their franchise system. Franchisors provide their hotels with brand recognition, marketing support and centralized reservation systems for the franchised hotels.

Franchisor/Managers—own a brand or brands and also operate hotels on behalf of the hotel owner or franchisee.

Managers—operate hotels on behalf of the hotel owner, but do not, themselves, own a brand. The hotels may be operated under a franchise agreement or as an independent hotel.

The hotel manager is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the hotel, including the employment of hotel staff, the determination of room rates, the development of sales and marketing plans, the preparation of operating and capital expenditure budgets and the preparation of financial reports for the owner. They typically receive fees based on the revenues and profitability of the hotel.

The lodging industry is viewed as consisting of six different segments, each of which caters to a discrete set of customer tastes and needs: luxury, upper upscale, upscale, midscale (with and without food and beverage service) and economy. Our portfolio primarily consists of luxury and upper upscale properties that are located in the central business districts of major cities, near airports and resort/conference destinations, which are operated under internationally recognized brand names such as Marriott, Hyatt, Starwood and Accor (see – “Our Hotel Portfolio”). Revenues earned at our hotels consist of three broad categories: rooms, food and beverage, and other revenues. While approximately 65% of our revenue is generated from room sales, many of our properties feature a variety of amenities that help drive demand and profitability. Our hotels typically include meeting and banquet facilities, a variety of restaurants and lounges, swimming pools, exercise facilities and/or spas, gift shops and parking facilities, the combination of which enable them to serve business, leisure and group travelers.   

The following graphs summarize the composition of the 114 hotels in our consolidated portfolio based on the percentage of revenues represented by our luxury, upper upscale and other categories and by property type:    

2


Our industry is influenced by the cyclical relationship between the supply of and demand for hotel rooms. Lodging demand growth typically is related to the vitality of the overall economy, in addition to local market factors that stimulate travel to specific destinations. In particular, economic indicators such as GDP growth, business investment and employment growth are some of the primary drivers of lodging demand. The global recession of 2008 and 2009 resulted in a considerable decline both in consumer and business spending and a severe declinetimeshare joint venture in demand within the lodging industry.  Beginning in 2010, as economic conditions gradually have stabilized and strengthened, lodging demand has improved steadily, driven by moderate GDP growth in the U.S. coupled with increasing business investment. The primary demand driver has been transient demand from business and leisure travelers and, to a much lesser degree, group business.  We expect demand to continue to improve in 2014, as the potential for growth in group business, and expected continued growth in transient business, could lead to further RevPAR improvements. However, several economic headwinds may hamper lodging demand, including the expected tapering of the U.S. federal reserve bond-buying program known as quantitative easing, the tenuous nature of the Euro Zone recovery, the slow-down in growth in China and general instability in emerging markets.Hawaii.

Lodging supply growth generally is driven by overall lodging demand, as extended periods of strong demand growth tend to encourage new development. However, the rate of supply growth also is influenced by a number of additional factors, including the availability of capital, interest rates, construction costs and unique market considerations. The relatively long lead-time required to complete the development of hotels makes supply growth easier to forecast than demand growth, but increases the volatility of the cyclical behavior of the lodging industry. As illustrated in the charts below for the U.S. lodging industry, at different points in the cycle, demand may increase when there is no new supply or supply may grow when demand is declining. The decline in lodging demand during the recession of 2008 through 2009 and the lack of available financing for new hotel construction caused a significant reduction in hotel development. As a result, supply growth was relatively low in 2010 through 2013. Overall, we expect domestic supply growth to remain constrained in 2014, at approximately 1.5%, which still is below the historical average of approximately 2%. Additionally, we believe that the average supply growth for upper upscale hotels in our markets will be approximately 0.9% in 2014.  However, New York City and Washington, D.C. are expected to experience above average growth in supply, which will increase competition in these markets.

We anticipate that demand growth will exceed supply growth in the near term, resulting in continued growth in revenue per available room (“RevPAR”), which is consistent with analysis prepared by PKF Hospitality Research. RevPAR is a commonly used operational measure of hotel performance in the lodging industry calculated as the product of average room rate and occupancy percentage. Occupancy levels in the upper-upscale market currently are above their 15-year average. Therefore, while there is potential for occupancy growth, we believe RevPAR growth primarily will be driven by increases in average room rate. However, there can be no assurance that any increases in hotel revenues or earnings at our properties or improvement in margins will continue for any number of reasons, including those discussed above.    

3


Our portfolio primarily consists of upper upscale hotels and, accordingly, its performance is best understood in comparison to the upper upscale segment rather than the entire industry. The charts below detail the historical supply, demand and RevPAR growth for the U.S. lodging industry and for the U.S. upper upscale segment for 2009 to 2013 and forecast data for 2014:

U.S. Lodging Industry Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

U.S. Upper Upscale Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

 

Business Strategy

Our primary long-term business objectivegoal is to providebe the preeminent owner of high-quality lodging real estate in growing markets and to generate superior totallong-term returns tofor our equity holdersstockholders throughout all lodging cycles through a combination of appreciation in asset values, growth in earnings and dividend distributions. ToOur strategy to achieve this objective we seek to:includes:

drive operating results at our properties through aggressive asset management;

Superior Portfolio - Own a geographically-diverse portfolio of hotels located in major urban centers and resort destinations;

acquire properties in urban and resort/conference destinations. We will continue to focus on target markets in gateway domestic cities such as New York, Washington, D.C., Boston, Miami, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Seattle and Hawaii and international cities, such as London, Paris, Munich, Berlin, Madrid, Barcelona, Stockholm,

4


Sydney, Tokyo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Mexico City, which we believe have strong demand generators that appeal to multiple customer segments and have high barriers to entry that limit new supply. While our focus will remain primarily on luxury and upper upscale properties, we will remain opportunistic and may acquire or develop hotels in other lodging segments or markets;

wherever possible, match each property with the appropriate manager and brand affiliation. For the majority of our portfolio, we seek properties that are franchised or operated by leading management companies as we believe their wide-spread brand recognition and brand loyalty programs can maximize demand. We will also look for opportunities to enhance flexibility in our management agreements which can increase the market value of the property;

strategically invest in major redevelopment and return on investment (“ROI”) projects in order to maximize the inherent value in our portfolio;

maintain a strong balance sheet with a low leverage level and balanced debt maturities in order to minimize our cost of capital and to maximize our financial flexibility in order to take advantage of opportunities throughout the lodging cycle;

expand our global portfolio holdings and revenue sources through joint ventures or direct acquisitions that diversify our investments; and

recycle capital through the disposition of assets to better align our portfolio within our target gateway markets. We also may opportunistically dispose of hotels to take advantage of market conditions or in situations where the hotels are at a competitive risk.

Since 2002, the percentage of revenues from our target markets in the U.S.Disciplined Capital Allocation - Allocate and internationally has increased from approximately 55%recycle capital to 75%. The following graph summarizes the composition of our consolidated hotels by market based on percentage of revenues (which excludes properties owned by our European and Asia/Pacific joint ventures):  

    

Acquisitions and Development. Our acquisition strategy focuses on acquiring hotels at attractive yieldsearn returns that exceed our cost of capital and actively return capital to stockholders;

Strong Asset Management Capabilities - Create value in our targetexisting portfolio through asset management and capital investment;

Powerful and Flexible Capital Structure - Maintain a strong and flexible capital structure that allows us to execute our strategy throughout all lodging cycles; and


Employer of Choice and Responsible Corporate Citizen – Align our organizational structure with our business objectives to be an employer of choice and a responsible corporate citizen.

Portfolio. We seek to have a well-balanced portfolio in major markets and premier resort and convention destinations that we expect will perform well over time. Therefore, we focus on refining our portfolio to include multiple types of hotels in locations which we believe have strong demand generators that appeal to multiple customer segments and achieve premium rates. We will look to acquisitions as well as new development opportunities to enhance our portfolio. We focus generally on the following types of assets:

Resorts in locations with strong airlift and limited supply growth. These assets feature superior amenities and are operated by premier operators;

Convention destination hotels that are group oriented in urban and resort markets. These assets feature extensive and high-quality meeting facilities and are often connected to prominent convention centers;

City-center hotels in urban and coastal markets. Positioned in prime locations, these assets possess multiple demand drivers for both business and leisure travelers; and

Suburban and airport hotels that either are market leaders in prime suburban commercial locations or connected to airport terminals and/or conveniently located on airport grounds.

We strive for diversified exposure within multiple brands, focused asset classes, and favorable locations. As discussed above, these markets consistone of gateway citiesthe largest owners of Marriott and Hyatt properties, our hotels primarily are operated under brand names that are among the most respected and widely recognized in the U.S.lodging industry. Within these brands, we have focused predominately on the upper-upscale and in key international cities that are positioned to attract premium corporate,luxury asset classes, as we believe they have a broad appeal for both the individual and group leisure and international travelers, and have significant barriers to entry.  Based on historical trends,business customers. We also may invest in other property types which we believe these markets will have favorable long-term supply and demand dynamics and consequently betterthe potential for revenue growth.strong demand growth, including urban select service. In the U.S.,addition, we willhave unbranded or soft-branded properties that remain distinctive and appeal to a certain customer profile.

Internationally, our focus primarilyis on acquiring upper upscale and luxury hotels at prices below replacement cost and, secondarily, developing midscale and upscale hotels with strategic partners,premium assets in target markets. Our efforts in Europe will include the acquisition of upper upscale and luxury hotels in our targetmajor Western European markets through our European joint venture.Joint Venture platform. In accordance with this strategy, we actively reduced our exposure to markets in the Asia-Pacific region and in South and Central America.

Capital Allocation. Guided by a disciplined approach to capital allocation, we are positioned to make capital decisions around delivering the greatest value and returning capital to stockholders. Our goal is to allocate and recycle capital to enhance our portfolio and earn returns that exceed our risk-adjusted cost of capital.

5


Asia/Pacific and Latin America regions,We look to refine our portfolio through our disposition strategy.  Generally, our dispositions are focused on assets where we will concentrate bothbelieve the potential for growth is constrained or on properties with significant capital expenditures requirements that we do not believe would generate a return on the acquisitioninvestment. Prior to the sale of upper upscale and luxury hotels and the development of midscale and upscale hotels in our target markets, whichassets, we may look for opportunities to acquire directlyincrease the sale price, which can include value-added capital expenditures projects and ground lease extensions. We also look to take advantage of opportunities to capture attractive pricing for hotels that have management contract flexibility. We also may opportunistically dispose of higher-quality assets through direct sales or through the creation of joint venturesventures.

We focus on creating and mining value from our existing portfolio through capital investments and value enhancement initiatives and by seeking to appropriately match each hotel within its specific market with strategic partners. Wethe best operator and brand to optimize operating performance. These projects may acquire additional properties through various structures, including transactions involving single assets, portfolios, joint venturesinclude significant changes to guest rooms, food and acquisitionsbeverage outlets, public space and meeting space, as well as a repositioning of the securitiesproperty under a different operator or assets of other REITs.   brand. We work closely with our managers to attempt to schedule these projects to minimize operational disruption and environmental impact.

Value Enhancement Initiatives.Initiatives We look to enhance the value of our portfolio by identifying and executing strategies designedseek to achieve the highest and best use of our properties. These projects have includedmay include the development of timeshare, office space or condominium units on excess land, redevelopment or expansion of existing retail space, the purchase or extension of ground leases,and the acquisition of air rights or development entitlements or the restructuring of management agreements. We believe that the successful execution of these projects will create significant value for the company.    entitlements.

Redevelopment and Return on Investment Projects. ProjectsWe pursue opportunities to enhance asset value by completing select capital improvements outside the scope of recurring renewal and replacement capital expenditures. These projects are designed to take advantage of changing market conditions and the favorable location of our properties, while seeking to increase profitability and enhance customer satisfaction. We also evaluate our capital expenditures projects based on their environmental impact. In collaboration with our hotel managers, we evaluate new products and systems designed to optimize energy performance and reduce water consumption. Many of these sustainability projects include the renewal and replacement of systems and equipment reaching the end of its life cycle with more efficient solutions and incorporating sustainable materials and construction practices within renovation projects. We also invest in building infrastructure projects that mitigate potential risks associated with extreme weather events or climate change. Our capital expenditures projects generally fall into the following categories:

Redevelopment projects. These projects are designed to optimally positionimprove the positioning of our hotels within their markets and competitive set. Redevelopment projects include extensive renovations of guest rooms includingand bathrooms, lobbies, food and beverage outlets,outlets; expanding and/or extensive renovation of ballroom and meeting rooms, androoms; major mechanical system upgrades.upgrades, and green building initiatives and certifications.

Targeted Return on Investment (ROI) projects. These ROI projects often are smaller and focused on specific areas, such asincreasing space profitability or lowering net operating costs. Typical ROI projects include converting unprofitable or underutilized space into meeting space, adding guestrooms, orand implementing aenergy and water conservation


measures such as LED lighting, boilers, solar power, energy management systems, guestroom water efficient fixtures, and building automation system.systems.

Acquisition Capital Expenditures Projects. In connection with the acquisition of a property, we prepare capital and operational improvement plans designed to improve profitability and enhance the guest experience. These projects may include required renewal and replacement projects, significant redevelopment and even re-branding of the property and represent a key component of our decision to invest in a hotel and typically are completed within two to three years of acquisition.

Renewal and Replacement Capital ExpendituresExpenditures. We work closely with are designed to maintain the quality and competitiveness of our managers to ensure that renewal and replacement capital expenditures are spent efficiently in order to maximize the profitability of the hotel while minimizing disruption to operations.properties.  Typically, room renovations occur at intervals of approximately seven years, but the timing may vary based on the type of property and equipment being replaced.renovated. These refurbishmentsrenovations generally are divided into the following types: soft goods, case goods, bathroom and infrastructure. Soft goods include items such as carpeting, bed spreads, curtains and wall vinyl and may require more frequent updates in order to maintain brand quality standards. Case goods include items such as dressers, desks, couches, restaurant and meeting room chairs and tables andtables; which generally are not replaced as frequently. Bathroom renovations include the replacement of tile, vanity, lighting and plumbing fixtures. Infrastructure includes the physical plant of the hotel, including the roof, elevators,elevators/escalators, façade, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems and fire systems.

Asset Management.Management. As the owner of a diverse portfolio of properties,We believe we are in a unique position to work with our managers to maximize revenues, while minimizingdrive operating costs.performance and implement value-added real estate decisions. The size and composition of our portfolio and our affiliation with most of the leading operatorsbrands and brandsoperators in the industry allow usour asset managers to benchmark similar hotels and identify best practices and efficiencies that can improve the long-term profitabilityprofitability. Our asset managers are supported by our enterprise analytics group, which provides independent underwriting of our hotelsby driving groupROI and value-enhancement projects, business which allows our operators to shift the mixintelligence, revenue management and analysis of business to the higher-rated transient segments.restaurant and bar operations. We also carefullymonitor and evaluate our property agreements, including management and franchise agreements, priorfor opportunities to obtain additional contract flexibility over provisions such as sale rights and fee structures. Our goal is to differentiate our assets within their competitive market, drive operating performance and enhance the acquisition of a new hotel or upon termination of an existing contract. This may include obtaining franchise rights for hotels and hiring an independent operator to manage the hotel, which may be more efficient for some hotels, while still maintaining the brand recognitionvalue of the existing manager. See “—Operational Agreements”real estate.

Enhance profitability by using our business intelligence system to benchmark and monitor hotel performance and cost controls and complete deep-dive analytic reviews across brands and properties to seek to identify new opportunities that could increase profit.

Drive revenue growth by conducting detailed strategic reviews with our managers on market pricing and segment mix in order to develop the appropriate group/transient mix and market share targets for further discussion.  each property. We work with our managers to ensure that their brands’ on-line presence addresses a broad customer base.

CapitalWork with leading brands, as well as independent operators, in the lodging industry, we look to capitalize on situations where we have management agreement flexibility to appropriately match a hotel and its operator, brand and contract terms, including new or expanded relationships with independent operators. Our frequent evaluations of brands and operators help us to improve allocation of sales resources by our managers and allow us to help guide their digital and e-commerce strategies in an effort to drive RevPAR growth and reduce operating costs.

Improve contract flexibility through the extension or purchase of ground leases or the restructuring of management agreements.  

Financing Strategy.  Our goal is to maintain a flexible capital structure and liquidity profile.that allows us to execute our strategy throughout the lodging cycle. In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, Host Inc. is required to distribute 90% of its taxable income (other than net capital gain)gain, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to which we do not receive cash) to its stockholders and, as a result, generally relies on external sources of capital, as well as cash from operations, to finance growth. We use a variety of debt and equity instruments to fund our external growth, including senior notes and mortgage debt, exchangeable debentures, common and preferred stock offerings, issuances of OP units and joint ventures/limited partnerships to take advantage of the prevailing market conditions.

Management believes that a strong balance sheet is a key competitive advantage that affords us a lower cost of capital and positions us for external growth. While we may issue debt at any time, management believes it is prudent, over time, towe will target a leveragenet debt-to-earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) ratio, of approximately 3.0x debt-to-EBITDA.(or “Leverage Ratio,” as defined in our credit facility) that allows us to maintain an investment grade rating on our senior unsecured debt. We believe that lower leverage reduces our overall cost of capital and our earnings volatility and increases ouran investment grade rating will deliver the most consistent access to capital, thereby providing us withcapital.

6


the necessary flexibility to take advantage of opportunities throughout the lodging cycle, which we consider a key competitive advantage.

We also seek to structure our debt profile to allow us maintain financial flexibility and a balanced maturity schedule with access to access different forms of financing,financing; primarily senior notes and exchangeable debentures, as well as mortgage debt (particularly outside of the U.S. when debt is priced reasonably and can be denominated in the local currency).debt. Generally, this means we look to minimize the number of assets that are encumbered by mortgage debt, minimize near-term maturities and maintain a balanced maturity schedule. We may issue debt in foreign currencies to match the proceeds thereof with their intended use in order to reduce the potential costs of investing in foreign properties in terms of foreign currency fluctuation and local taxes. Depending on market conditions, we also may utilize variable rate debt which can provide greater protection during a decline in the lodging industry.

Joint Ventures.We expect to continue to utilize joint ventures to finance external growth. We believe joint ventures provide a significant means to access external capital and spread the inherent risk of hotel ownership.


Throughout the lodging cycle, to the extent that we are unable to find appropriate investment opportunities that meet our return requirements, we will focus on returning capital to stockholders through dividends or common stock repurchases. Significant factors we review to determine the level and timing of the returns to stockholders include the current stock price compared to our determination of the underlying value of our assets, current and forecast operating results and the completion of hotel sales.  

Corporate Responsibility. Our primary focus for joint ventures is in international markets, which helps to diversify exposure to market risk.corporate responsibility strategy focuses on a set of complementary objectives across three themes:

Dispositions.Responsible Investment: Our disposition strategy is aligned with our overall portfolio focus to reallocate ourDuring the acquisition of properties, we assess both capital investments to target gateway markets. Generally, our dispositions will be focused on secondary or tertiary markets, orthat may include sustainability opportunities and climate change related risks as part of our strategydue diligence process. During the ownership of our properties, we seek to limit our total investment within individual markets. We may dispose of assetsinvest in proven sustainability practices in our redevelopment and ROI projects that can enhance asset value while also improving environmental performance.

Environmental Stewardship: We seek to improve the environmental footprint of our properties.  We have established measurable goals to reduce energy consumption, water usage and carbon emissions from across our portfolio and will continue to report on actual performance in our environmental disclosures. In our redevelopment and ROI projects, we may target marketsspecific environmental efficiency projects, equipment upgrades and replacements that reduce energy and water consumption and offer appropriate returns on investment.

Corporate Citizenship: We are committed to being a responsible corporate citizen and strengthening our local communities through direct salesfinancial support, community engagement, volunteer service, and industry collaboration. Our approach is reinforced by our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and periodic engagement with key stakeholders to understand their corporate responsibility priorities.

In March 2016, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) issued the provisional standard, Real Estate Owners, Developers & Investment Trusts Sustainability Accounting Standard. The provisional standard outlines proposed disclosure topics and accounting metrics for the real estate industry. The recommended energy and water management metrics that best correlate with our industry include energy consumption data coverage as a percentage of floor area (“Energy Intensity”); total energy consumed by portfolio area (“Total Energy Consumption”); water withdrawal as a percentage of total floor area, or number of units (for our calculation we use occupied rooms) (“Water Intensity”); and total water withdrawn by portfolio area (“Total Water Consumption”). The energy and water data we use is collected and reviewed by third-parties who compile the data from property utility statements. These metrics enable us to track the effectiveness of water and energy reduction ROI projects.

We reference key aspects and metrics of our sustainability efforts through the creationGlobal Reporting Initiative (“GRI”) Index, in accordance with the GRI framework and, beginning in 2015, contracted with a third-party to provide further verification of joint ventures when we haveour energy and water consumption data. The charts below detail our Energy Intensity, Total Energy Consumption, Water Intensity and Total Water Consumption for 2013 through 2015, the opportunity to capitalize on value enhancement strategies and apply the proceeds to other business objectives. Additionally, we will dispose of properties where we believe the potentiallast three fiscal years for growthwhich data is constrained or on properties with significant capital expenditure requirements where we do not believe we would generate a significant return on the investment. Proceeds from dispositions are deployed to repay debt or fund acquisitions and ROI/redevelopment projects.available(1):

Corporate Responsibility

Host’s corporate responsibility strategy integrates fiscal, environmental and social elements at both the corporate and portfolio levels. Our corporate responsibility program focuses on the following themes and objectives:

(1)

Energy and water metrics relate to our consolidated domestic hotels owned for the entire year presented. The water data excludes one domestic hotel in 2013, 2014 and 2015, as reliable utility data was not available.


The Lodging Industry

The lodging industry in the United States consists of private and public entities that operate in an extremely diversified market under a variety of brand names. The lodging industry has several key participants:

Ownersown the hotel and typically enter into an agreement for an independent third party to manage the hotel. These properties may be branded and operated under the manager’s brand or branded under a franchise agreement and operated by the franchisee or by an independent hotel manager. The properties also may be operated as an independent hotel by an independent hotel manager.

Owner/Managers—own the hotel and operate the property with their own management team. These properties may be branded under a franchise agreement, operated as an independent hotel or operated under the owner’s brand. We are prohibited from operating and managing hotels under applicable REIT rules.

Franchisors—own a brand or brands and strive to grow their revenues by expanding the number of hotels in their franchise system. Franchisors provide their hotels with brand recognition, marketing support and centralized reservation systems for the franchised hotels.

Franchisor/Managers—own a brand or brands and also operate hotels on behalf of the hotel owner or franchisee.

Managers—operate hotels on behalf of the hotel owner, but do not, themselves, own a brand. The hotels may be operated under a franchise agreement or as an independent hotel.

The hotel manager is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the hotel, including the employment of hotel staff, the determination of room rates, the development of sales and marketing plans, the preparation of operating and capital expenditures budgets and the preparation of financial reports for the owner. The hotel manager typically receives fees based on the revenues and profitability of the hotel.

Supply and Demand Trends. Our industry is influenced by the cyclical relationship between the supply of and demand for hotel rooms. Lodging demand growth typically is related to the vitality of the overall economy, in addition to local market factors that stimulate travel to specific destinations. In particular, trends in economic indicators such as GDP growth, business investment and employment growth are key indicators of the relative strength of lodging demand. Lodging demand also will be affected by changes to international travel.

Lodging supply growth generally is driven by overall lodging demand, as extended periods of strong demand growth tend to encourage new development. However, the rate of supply growth also is influenced by a number of additional factors, including the availability of capital, interest rates, construction costs and unique market considerations. The relatively long lead-time required to complete the development of hotels makes supply growth easier to forecast than demand growth, but increases the volatility of the cyclical behavior of the lodging industry. A recent source of supply for the industry has been the rapid growth of on-line short-term rentals. However, the impact on the hotel industry and the availability of these outlets is more variable than typical changes in supply from hotel construction and tends to be very market specific. As illustrated in the charts below for the U.S. lodging industry, at different points in the cycle, demand may increase when there is no new supply or supply may grow when demand is declining.


Our portfolio primarily consists of upper upscale hotels and, accordingly, its performance is best understood in comparison to the upper upscale segment rather than the entire industry. Following the market downturn in 2008 and 2009, new supply within this segment was limited and remained well below historic levels and, as a result, demand increased at a greater rate than supply, leading to RevPAR growth. However, as the market has strengthened, supply has increased, particularly in many of the major urban markets in which we compete. The supply growth rate is expected to continue to increase in 2017. The charts below detail the historical supply, demand and RevPAR growth for the U.S. lodging industry and for the U.S. upper upscale segment for 2012 to 2016 and forecast data for 2017:  

U.S. Lodging Industry Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

U.S. Upper Upscale Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

 


Managers and Operational Agreements

All of our hotels are managed by third parties pursuant to management or operating agreements, with some of such hotels also subject to separate franchise or license agreements addressing matters pertaining to operation under the designated brand. Under these agreements, the managers generally have sole responsibility and exclusive authority for all activities necessary for the day-to-day operation of the hotels, including establishing room rates, securing and processing reservations, procuring inventories, supplies and services, providing periodic inspection and consultation visits to the hotels by the managers’ technical and operational experts and promoting and publicizing the hotels. The managers provide all managerial and other employees for the hotels, review the operation and maintenance of the hotels, prepare reports, budgets and projections, and provide other administrative and accounting support services to the hotels. These support services include planning and policy services, divisional financial services, product planning and development, employee staffing and training, corporate executive management and certain in-house legal services. We have certain approval rights over budgets, capital expenditures, significant leases and contractual commitments, and various other matters.

As of February 20, 2017, our hotels are managed by the following hotel management companies:

Manager

# of hotels

Brands

Marriott International, Inc.

68

Ritz-Carlton®, JW Marriott®, Marriott Marquis®, Marriott®, Courtyard by Marriott®, Residence Inn by Marriott®, W®, Westin®, Sheraton®, Luxury Collection®, St. Regis®

Hyatt Hotels Corporation

8

Grand Hyatt®, Hyatt Regency®

AccorHotels

4

ibis®, Novotel®, Fairmont®, Swissôtel®

HEI Hotels & Resorts

3

Westin®, Sheraton®

Hilton Hotels & Resorts

2

Hilton®, Embassy Suites®

Crestline Hotels & Resorts

2

Marriott®, Hilton®

Sage Hospitality

2

Marriott®, Curio - A Collection by Hilton®

Kokua Hospitality

2

Axiom Hotel®, Hyatt Place®

Destination Hotels

2

Autograph Collection by Marriott®, YVE Hotel Miami®

Davidson Hotels & Resorts

3

Marriott®, Sheraton®, The Don CeSar®

96

These management agreements can affect the value of the property associated with it based on the pricing and flexibility of the agreement. We often will seek to negotiate the terms of an agreement, including termination rights, in order to provide greater value to the associated asset. In certain instances, such termination rights may only be exercisable after the payment of a fee or upon sale of a property. In other instances, the exercise of such termination rights may be conditioned upon a requirement that the property remain subject to a franchise agreement, or may be limited as to the number of management agreements that can be terminated within a given year. Currently, 31 of our properties include termination rights that provide us with additional flexibility. We have an additional ten properties currently operating under agreements that will end within the next 20 years, with no further extension options exercisable by the manager. See “Performance Termination Rights” and “Special Termination Rights” described below.  

General Terms and Provisions – Agreements governing our hotels managed by brand owners (Marriott, Hyatt, Hilton and AccorHotels, above) typically include the terms described below:

Responsible InvestmentTerm and fees for operational services: invest. The initial term of our management and operating agreements generally is 10 to 25 years, with one or more renewal terms at the option of the manager. The majority of our management agreements condition the manager’s right to exercise options for specified renewal terms upon the satisfaction of specified economic performance criteria. The manager typically receives compensation in proven sustainability practicesthe form of a base management fee, which is calculated as a percentage (generally 2-3%) of annual gross revenues, and an incentive management fee, which typically is calculated as a percentage (generally 10-20%) of operating profit after the owner has received a priority return on its investment in the hotel. In the case of our hotels operating under the W®, Westin®, Sheraton®, Luxury Collection® and St. Regis® brands and managed by Marriott following its acquisition of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. on September 23, 2016 (collectively, the “Starwood-Branded Hotels”), the base management fee is only 1% of annual gross revenues, but that create and drive value;amount is supplemented by license fees payable to Marriott under a separate license agreement (as described below).

Environmental StewardshipLicense services: monitor. In the case of the Starwood-Branded Hotels, operations are governed by separate license agreements addressing matters pertaining to the designated brand, including rights to use trademarks, service marks and improvelogos, matters relating to compliance with certain brand standards and policies, and the resource efficiencyprovision of certain system programs and environmental footprintcentralized services. Although the term of our properties;these license agreements with Marriott generally is coterminous with the corresponding operating agreements, the license agreements contemplate the potential for continued brand affiliation even in the event of a termination of the operating agreement. As noted above, the Marriott licensors receive compensation in the form of license fees (generally 5% of gross revenues attributable to room sales and 2% of gross revenues attributable to


food and beverage sales), which amounts supplement the lower base management fee of 1% of gross revenues received by Marriott under the operating agreements.

Chain or system programs and services. Managers are required to provide chain or system programs and services generally that are furnished on a centralized basis. Such services include the development and operation of certain computer systems and reservation services, regional or other centralized management and administrative services, marketing and sales programs and services, training and other personnel services, and other centralized or regional services as may be determined to be more efficiently performed on a centralized, regional or group basis rather than on an individual hotel basis. Costs and expenses incurred in providing these chain or system programs and services generally are allocated on a cost reimbursement basis among all hotels managed by the manager or its affiliates or that otherwise benefit from these services.

Working capital and fixed asset supplies. We are required to maintain working capital for each hotel and to fund the cost of certain fixed asset supplies (for example, linen, china, glassware, silver and uniforms). We also are responsible for providing funds to meet the cash needs for hotel operations if at any time the funds available from working capital are insufficient to meet the financial requirements of the hotels. For certain hotels, the working capital accounts which would otherwise be maintained by the managers for each of such hotels are maintained on a pooled basis, with managers being authorized to make withdrawals from such pooled account as otherwise contemplated with respect to working capital in accordance with the provisions of the management or operating agreements.

Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacements. We are required to provide the managers with all furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”) necessary for the operation of the hotels (including funding any required FF&E replacements). On an annual basis, the managers prepare budgets for FF&E to be acquired and certain routine repairs and maintenance to be performed in the next year and an estimate of the necessary funds, which budgets are subject to our review and approval. For purposes of funding such expenditures, a specified percentage (typically 5%) of the gross revenues of each hotel is deposited by the manager into an escrow or reserve account in our name, to which the manager has access. In the case of the Starwood-Branded Hotels, our operating agreements contemplate that this reserve account also may be used to fund the cost of certain major repairs and improvements affecting the hotel building (as described below). For certain of our Marriott-managed hotels (excluding the Starwood-Branded Hotels), we have entered into an agreement with Marriott to allow for such expenditures to be funded from one pooled reserve account, rather than funds being deposited into separate reserve accounts at each hotel, with the minimum required balance maintained on an ongoing basis in that pooled reserve account being significantly below the amount that would have been maintained otherwise in such separate hotel reserve accounts. For certain of the Starwood-Branded Hotels, the periodic reserve fund contributions, which otherwise would be deposited into reserve accounts maintained by managers for each hotel, are distributed to us and, as to this pool of hotels, we are responsible for providing funding of expenditures which otherwise would be funded from reserve accounts for each of the subject hotels.

Building alterations, improvements and renewals. The managers are required to prepare an annual estimate of the expenditures necessary for major repairs, alterations, improvements, renewals and replacements to the structural, mechanical, electrical, heating, ventilating, air conditioning, plumbing and elevators of each hotel, along with alterations and improvements to the hotel as are required, in the manager’s reasonable judgment, to keep the hotel in a competitive, efficient and economical operating condition that is consistent with brand standards. We generally have approval rights as to such budgets and expenditures, which we review and approve based on our manager’s recommendations and on our judgment. Expenditures for these major repairs and improvements affecting the hotel building typically are funded directly by owners, although (as noted above) our agreements with Marriott in respect of the Starwood-Branded Hotels contemplate that certain such expenditures may be funded from the reserve account.

Treatment of additional owner funding. As additional owner funding becomes necessary either for expenditures generally funded from the FF&E replacement funds, or for any major repairs or improvements to the hotel building which may be required to be funded directly by owners, most of our agreements provide for an economic benefit to us through an impact on the calculation of incentive management fees payable to our managers. One approach frequently utilized at our Marriott-managed hotels (excluding the Starwood-Branded Hotels) is to provide such owner funding through loans which are repaid, with interest, from operational revenues, with the repayment amounts reducing operating profit available for payment of incentive management fees. Another approach that is used at the Starwood-Branded Hotels, as well as with certain capital expenditures projects at some of our other Marriott-managed hotels, is to treat such owner funding as an increase to our investment in the hotel, resulting in an increase to owner’s priority return with a corresponding reduction to the amount of operating profit available for payment of incentive management fees. For the hotels that are subject to the pooled arrangement described above, the amount of any additional reserve account funding is allocated to each of such hotels on a pro rata basis, determined with reference to the net operating income of each hotel and the total net operating income of all such pooled hotels for the most recent operating year.

Corporate CitizenshipTerritorial protections: strengthen local communities through financial support, community engagement. Certain management and volunteer service.operating agreements impose restrictions for a specified period which limit the manager and its affiliates from owning, operating or licensing a hotel of the same brand within a specified area.


The area restrictions vary with each hotel, from city blocks in urban areas to up to a multi-mile radius from the hotel in other areas.

Management and GovernanceSale of the hotel. Our corporate responsibility program isSubject to specific agreements as to certain hotels (see below under “Special Termination Rights”), we generally are limited in our ability to sell, lease or otherwise transfer the hotels by the requirement that the transferee assume the related management agreements and meet specified other conditions, including the condition that the transferee not be a competitor of the manager.

Performance Termination Rights. In addition to any right to terminate that may arise as a result of a default by the manager, most of our management and operating agreements include reserved rights by us to terminate on the basis of the manager’s failure to meet certain performance-based metrics, typically including a specified threshold return on owner’s investment in the hotel, along with a failure of the hotel to achieve a specified RevPAR performance threshold established with reference to other competitive hotels in the market. Typically, such performance-based termination rights arise in the event the operator fails to achieve these specified performance thresholds over a consecutive two-year period, and are subject to the manager’s ability to “cure” and avoid termination by payment to us of specified deficiency amounts (or, in some instances, waiver of the right to receive specified future management fees). We have agreed in the past, and may agree in the future, to waive certain of these termination rights in exchange for consideration from a manager or its affiliates, which consideration may include cash compensation or amendments to management agreements.

Special Termination Rights. In addition to any performance-based or other termination rights set forth in our management and operating agreements, we have specific negotiated termination rights as to certain management and operating agreements. While the brand affiliation of a property may increase the value of a hotel, the ability to dispose of a property unencumbered by a management agreement, or even brand affiliation, also can increase the value for prospective purchasers. These termination rights can take a number of different forms, including termination of agreements upon sale that leave the property unencumbered by any agreement; termination upon sale provided that the property continues to be operated under a license or franchise agreement with continued brand affiliation; as well as termination without sale or other condition, which may require the payment of a fee. These termination rights also may restrict the number of agreements that may be terminated over any annual or other period; impose limitations on the number of agreements terminated as measured by EBITDA; require that a certain number of properties continue to maintain the brand affiliation; or be restricted to a specific pool of assets.  

In addition to hotels managed by brand owners, we have both branded hotels and non-branded hotels operated by independent managers. Our management agreements with independent managers, while similar in operational scope to agreements with our Corporate Responsibility teambrand managers, typically have shorter initial terms, no renewal rights, more flexible termination rights, and governed by more limited system-wide services. However, while we have additional flexibility with regard to these operators, certain of those hotels remain subject to underlying franchise or licensing agreements. These franchise or licensing agreements allow us to engage independent managers to operate our hotels under the Nominatingapplicable brand names and Corporate Governance Committeeto participate in the brands’ reservation and loyalty-rewards systems. Under these agreements, we pay the brand owners a franchise or licensing fee equal to a specified percentage of the Board of Directors.gross rooms revenues, as well as other system fees and reimbursements. In addition, we are obligated to maintain applicable brand standards at our franchised hotels.  

Operating Structure

Host Inc. operates through an umbrella partnership structure in which substantially all of its assets are held by Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and holds approximately 98.7%99% of the OP units as of December 31, 2013.2016. A REIT is a corporation that has elected to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and that meets certain ownership, organizational and operating requirements set forth under the Code. In general, through payments of dividendsdividends to stockholders, a REIT is permitted to reduce or eliminate federal income taxes at the corporate level. Each OP unit owned by holders other than Host Inc. is redeemable, at the option of the holder, for an amount of cash equal to the market value of one share of Host Inc. common stock multiplied by a factor of 1.021494 (rather than athe current conversion factor of 1 share/OP unit that existed prior to the December 2009 stock dividend).1.021494. Host Inc. has the right to acquire any OP unit offered for redemption directly from the holder in exchange for 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock instead of Host L.P. redeeming such OP unit for cash. Additionally, for every share of common stock issued by Host Inc., Host L.P. will issue .97895 OP units to Host Inc. in exchange for the consideration received from the issuance of the common stock. As of December 31, 2013,2016, non-controlling limited partners held 9.58.6 million OP units, which were convertible into 9.78.7 million Host Inc. common shares. Assuming that all OP units held by non-controlling limited partners were converted into common shares, there would have been 764.5746.5 million common shares of Host Inc. outstanding at December 31, 2013.

72016.



Our operating structure is as follows:

 

Because Host Inc. has elected to be treated asAs a REIT, certain tax laws limit the amount of “non-qualifying” income that Host Inc. and Host L.P. can earn, including income derived directly from the operation of hotels. As a result, we lease substantially all of our consolidated properties to certain of our subsidiaries designated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) for federalfederal income tax purposes or to third party lessees. Our TRS are subject to income tax and are not limited as to the amount of non-qualifying income they can generate.generate, but they are limited in terms of their value as a percentage of the total value of our assets. Our TRS enter into agreements with third parties to manage the operations of the hotels. Our TRS also may own assets engaging in other activities that produce non-qualifying income, such as the development of timeshare or condominium units, subject to certain restrictions. The difference between the hotels’ net operating cash flow and the aggregate rents paid to Host L.P. is retained by our TRS as taxable income. Accordingly, the net effect of the TRS leases is that while, as a REIT, Host Inc. generally is exempt from federal income tax to the extent that it meets specific distribution requirements, among other REIT requirements, a portion of the net operating cash flow from our properties is subject to federal, state and, if applicable, foreign income tax.

Our Consolidated Hotel Portfolio

As of February 14, 2014,20, 2017, we owned a portfolio of 11496 hotel properties, of which 9989 are located in the United States and 157 are located in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico and New Zealand.Mexico. Our consolidated hotels located outside the United States collectively contain approximately 3,8262,000 rooms. Approximately 3%, 4%, and 5% of our revenues were attributed to the operations of these foreign properties in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. See Note 15 Geographic and Business Segment Information in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on revenues in the geographic regions in which we operate.

The lodging industry is viewed as consisting of six different segments, each of 2013, 2012which caters to a discrete set of customer tastes and 2011, respectively. We also are developing two hotel properties in Brazil.

needs: luxury, upper upscale, upscale, midscale (with and without food and beverage service) and economy. Our consolidated hotelsportfolio primarily consistconsists of luxury and upper upscale properties. Allproperties, which are operated under internationally recognized brand names such as Marriott, Westin, Sheraton, Hyatt and Hilton. There also has been a trend towards specialized, smaller boutique hotels that are customized towards a particular customer profile. Generally, these properties will be operated by an independent third party and either will have no brand affiliation, or will be associated with a major brand, while maintaining the majority of its independent identity (which we refer to as “soft-branded” properties). We have expanded our investments to include six independent and soft-branded properties where we believe it is the best fit for the hotel.

Revenues earned at our hotels consist of three broad categories: rooms, food and beverage, and other revenues. While approximately 64% of our hotels generally are located in the central business districts of major cities, near airports or in resort/conference destinations that, because of their locations, typically benefitrevenue is generated from barriers to entry for new supply. Thirty-nineroom sales, many of our ownedproperties feature a variety of amenities that help drive demand and profitability. Our hotels typically include meeting and banquet facilities, a variety of restaurants and lounges, swimming pools, exercise facilities and/or spas, gift shops and parking facilities, the combination of which enable them to serve business, leisure and group travelers.  


Thirty nine of our consolidated hotels, representing approximately 63%64% of our revenues, have in excess of 500 rooms.  The average age of our properties is 3034 years, although substantially all of the properties have benefited from significant renovations or major additions, as well as regularly scheduled renewal and replacement expenditures and other capital improvements.

8


By Brand. The following table details our consolidated hotel portfolio by brand as of February 14, 2014:20, 2017:

 

 

 

Number

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

Brand

 

of Hotels

 

 

Rooms

 

 

Revenues (1)

 

Marriott

 

 

57

 

 

 

31,431

 

 

 

49.2

%

Ritz-Carlton

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,684

 

 

 

7.2

 

Starwood:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Westin

 

 

13

 

 

 

6,900

 

 

 

11.2

 

Sheraton

 

 

8

 

 

 

6,044

 

 

 

9.7

 

W

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,390

 

 

 

3.2

 

St. Regis

 

 

1

 

 

 

232

 

 

 

0.6

 

The Luxury Collection

 

 

1

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

0.1

 

Hyatt

 

 

9

 

 

 

6,809

 

 

 

11.9

 

Hilton/Embassy Suites

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,041

 

 

 

1.6

 

Swissôtel

 

 

1

 

 

 

661

 

 

 

1.1

 

Four Seasons

 

 

1

 

 

 

364

 

 

 

1.0

 

Fairmont

 

 

1

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

1.8

 

Delta

 

 

1

 

 

 

374

 

 

 

0.4

 

Accor:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ibis

 

 

3

 

 

 

455

 

 

 

0.3

 

Novotel

 

 

4

 

 

 

713

 

 

 

0.6

 

Other

 

 

1

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

59,838

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

Number

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

Brand

 

of Hotels

 

 

Rooms

 

 

Revenues (1)

 

Marriott:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marriott

 

 

38

 

 

 

22,974

 

 

 

38.9

%

Ritz-Carlton

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,403

 

 

 

7.5

 

Autograph Collection

 

 

1

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

0.3

 

JW Marriott

 

 

5

 

 

 

2,221

 

 

 

4.0

 

W

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,390

 

 

 

2.9

 

St. Regis

 

 

1

 

 

 

232

 

 

 

0.5

 

Luxury Collection

 

 

1

 

 

 

643

 

 

 

2.1

 

Westin

 

 

13

 

 

 

6,912

 

 

 

11.9

 

Sheraton

 

 

6

 

 

 

5,418

 

 

 

9.0

 

Residence Inn

 

 

1

 

 

 

299

 

 

 

0.3

 

Courtyard

 

 

1

 

 

 

337

 

 

 

0.3

 

Hyatt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Hyatt

 

 

3

 

 

 

2,964

 

 

 

5.9

 

Hyatt Place

 

 

1

 

 

 

426

 

 

 

0.6

 

Hyatt Regency

 

 

5

 

 

 

3,421

 

 

 

6.5

 

Hilton:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Curio

 

 

1

 

 

 

391

 

 

 

0.8

 

Hilton

 

 

2

 

 

 

607

 

 

 

0.9

 

Embassy Suites

 

 

1

 

 

 

455

 

 

 

0.7

 

AccorHotels:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swissôtel

 

 

1

 

 

 

661

 

 

 

1.1

 

Fairmont

 

 

1

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

2.1

 

ibis

 

 

1

 

 

 

256

 

 

 

0.1

 

Novotel

 

 

1

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

0.1

 

Other/Independent

 

 

3

 

 

 

742

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

53,629

 

 

 

97

%

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

PercentageBased on our 2016 revenues; sold hotels accounted for the remaining 3% of revenues is based on forecast 2014our revenues. No individual property contributed more than 7% of total revenues in 2013. 2016.  

 

 

9



By Location. The following table details the location and number of rooms at our consolidated hotels as of February 14, 2014:20, 2017:

Location

 

Rooms

 

 

Location

 

Rooms

 

 

Rooms

 

 

Location

 

Rooms

 

Arizona

 

 

 

 

 

Illinois

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Illinois (continued)

 

 

 

 

Scottsdale Marriott Suites Old Town

 

 

243

 

 

Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove

 

 

254

 

 

 

243

 

 

Chicago Marriott Suites O’Hare

 

 

256

 

Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains

 

 

266

 

 

Chicago Marriott O'Hare

 

 

470

 

 

 

266

 

 

Courtyard Chicago Downtown/River North

 

 

337

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix

 

 

281

 

 

Chicago Marriott Suites O’Hare

 

 

256

 

The Phoenician, A Luxury Collection Resort

 

 

643

 

 

Embassy Suites by Hilton Chicago Downtown

 

 

 

 

The Camby Hotel

 

 

277

 

 

     Magnificent Mile

 

 

455

 

The Westin Kierland Resort & Spa

 

 

732

 

 

Courtyard Chicago Downtown/River North

 

 

337

 

 

 

732

 

 

Swissôtel Chicago

 

 

661

 

California

 

 

 

 

 

Embassy Suites Chicago-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Westin Chicago River North

 

 

429

 

Axiom Hotel

 

 

152

 

 

Indiana

 

 

 

 

Coronado Island Marriott Resort & Spa (1)

 

 

300

 

 

Downtown/Lakefront

 

 

455

 

 

 

300

 

 

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing

 

 

395

 

Costa Mesa Marriott

 

 

253

 

 

Swissôtel Chicago

 

 

661

 

 

 

253

 

 

The Westin Indianapolis

 

 

575

 

JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa

 

 

884

 

 

The Westin Chicago River North

 

 

424

 

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport

 

 

789

 

 

Indiana

 

 

 

 

 

 

789

 

 

Louisiana

 

 

 

 

Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (1)

 

 

1,628

 

 

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,628

 

 

New Orleans Marriott

 

 

1,333

 

Manhattan Beach Marriott (1)

 

 

385

 

 

Crossing (1)

 

 

395

 

Marina del Rey Marriott (1)

 

 

370

 

 

The Westin Indianapolis

 

 

573

 

 

 

370

 

 

Maryland

 

 

 

 

Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina (1)

 

 

1,360

 

 

Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center

 

 

284

 

Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

 

 

532

 

 

Louisiana

 

 

 

 

 

 

532

 

 

Massachusetts

 

 

 

 

Newport Beach Marriott Bayview

 

 

254

 

 

New Orleans Marriott

 

 

1,329

 

 

 

254

 

 

Boston Marriott Copley Place

 

 

1,144

 

San Diego Marriott Marquis & Marina (1)

 

 

1,360

 

 

Maryland

 

 

 

 

San Diego Marriott Mission Valley

 

 

350

 

 

Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center

 

 

284

 

San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf

 

 

285

 

 

Massachusetts

 

 

 

 

 

 

285

 

 

Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Overlooking Boston

 

 

470

 

San Francisco Marriott Marquis (1)

 

 

1,500

 

 

Boston Marriott Copley Place

 

 

1,144

 

 

 

1,500

 

 

Sheraton Boston Hotel

 

 

1,220

 

San Ramon Marriott (1)

 

 

368

 

 

Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Overlooking Boston

 

 

470

 

 

 

368

 

 

The Westin Waltham Boston

 

 

351

 

Santa Clara Marriott (1)

 

 

759

 

 

Sheraton Boston Hotel

 

 

1,220

 

 

 

759

 

 

Minnesota

 

 

 

 

Sheraton San Diego Hotel & Marina (1)

 

 

1,053

 

 

Sheraton Needham Hotel

 

 

247

 

 

 

1,053

 

 

Minneapolis Marriott City Center

 

 

583

 

The Powell Hotel

 

 

151

 

 

The Westin Waltham-Boston

 

 

346

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey (1)

 

 

304

 

 

Minnesota

 

 

 

 

 

 

304

 

 

New Jersey

 

 

 

 

The Westin Los Angeles Airport (1)

 

 

740

 

 

Minneapolis Marriott City Center (1)

 

 

583

 

 

 

740

 

 

Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

591

 

The Westin Mission Hills Resort & Spa

 

 

512

 

 

Missouri

 

 

 

 

 

 

512

 

 

Sheraton Parsippany Hotel

 

 

370

 

The Westin South Coast Plaza, Costa Mesa (2)

 

 

390

 

 

Kansas City Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

384

 

 

 

390

 

 

New York

 

 

 

 

Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

New Jersey

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New York Marriott Downtown

 

 

513

 

Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel

 

 

628

 

 

Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

591

 

Denver Marriott Tech Center

 

 

605

 

 

New York Marriott Marquis

 

 

1,966

 

Denver Marriott West (1)

 

 

305

 

 

Park Ridge Marriott (1)

 

 

289

 

 

 

305

 

 

Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel

 

 

1,780

 

The Westin Denver Downtown

 

 

430

 

 

Sheraton Parsippany Hotel

 

 

370

 

 

 

430

 

 

The Westin New York Grand Central

 

 

774

 

Florida

 

 

 

 

 

New York

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

W New York

 

 

696

 

Tampa Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

298

 

 

New York Marriott Downtown

 

 

497

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa (1)(3)

 

 

650

 

 

New York Marriott Marquis

 

 

1,957

 

Hilton Singer Island Oceanfront Resort

 

 

222

 

 

Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel

 

 

1,780

 

Hilton Singer Island Oceanfront/Palm Beaches

 

 

 

 

 

W New York – Union Square

 

 

270

 

Resort

 

 

223

 

 

Ohio

 

 

 

 

Miami Marriott Biscayne Bay (1)

 

 

600

 

 

The Westin New York Grand Central

 

 

774

 

 

 

600

 

 

The Westin Cincinnati (1)

 

 

456

 

Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

2,000

 

 

W New York

 

 

696

 

 

 

2,004

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & Marina

 

 

719

 

 

W New York – Union Square (3)

 

 

270

 

Tampa Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

298

 

 

Philadelphia Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

419

 

The Don CeSar

 

 

347

 

 

The Logan

 

 

391

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island

 

 

446

 

 

North Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

 

446

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

 

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples

 

 

450

 

 

Greensboro-High Point Marriott Airport (1)

 

 

299

 

 

 

450

 

 

Sheraton Memphis Downtown

 

 

600

 

The Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples

 

 

295

 

 

Ohio

 

 

 

 

 

 

295

 

 

Texas

 

 

 

 

YVE Hotel Miami

 

 

243

 

 

Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush

 

 

 

 

Georgia

 

 

 

 

 

Dayton Marriott

 

 

399

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intercontinental (1) (3)

 

 

573

 

Atlanta Marriott Suites Midtown (1)

 

 

254

 

 

The Westin Cincinnati (1)

 

 

456

 

 

 

254

 

 

Houston Marriott Medical Center (1)

 

 

395

 

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center

 

 

341

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

 

 

 

Grand Hyatt Atlanta in Buckhead

 

 

439

 

 

Four Seasons Hotel Philadelphia

 

 

364

 

 

 

439

 

 

JW Marriott Houston

 

 

516

 

JW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead

 

 

371

 

 

Philadelphia Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

419

 

 

 

371

 

 

San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter (1)

 

 

1,001

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead

 

 

510

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

 

 

 

 

510

 

 

San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk (1)

 

 

512

 

The Westin Buckhead Atlanta

 

 

365

 

 

Sheraton Memphis Downtown

 

 

600

 

 

 

365

 

 

The St. Regis Houston

 

 

232

 

Hawaii

 

 

 

 

 

Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virginia

 

 

 

 

Fairmont Kea Lani, Maui

 

 

450

 

 

Hyatt Regency Reston

 

 

518

 

Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach

 

 

426

 

 

Key Bridge Marriott

 

 

582

 

Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa

 

 

806

 

 

Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush

 

 

 

 

 

 

806

 

 

Residence Inn Arlington Pentagon City

 

 

299

 

The Fairmont Kea Lani, Maui

 

 

450

 

 

Intercontinental (1) (3)

 

 

565

 

Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach

 

 

426

 

 

Houston Marriott at the Texas Medical Center (1)

 

 

394

 

Illinois

 

 

 

 

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner (1)

 

 

398

 

Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove

 

 

254

 

 

Washington Dulles Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10



Location

 

Rooms

 

 

Location

 

Rooms

 

Texas (continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Australia

 

 

 

 

JW Marriott Houston

 

 

515

 

 

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (1) (3)

 

 

364

 

San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter (1)

 

 

1,001

 

 

Brazil

 

 

 

 

San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk (1)

 

 

512

 

 

JW Marriott Hotel Rio de Janeiro

 

 

245

 

The St. Regis Houston

 

 

232

 

 

Canada

 

 

 

 

Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

Calgary Marriott

 

 

384

 

Hyatt Regency Reston

 

 

518

 

 

Delta Meadowvale Hotel & Conference Centre

 

 

374

 

Key Bridge Marriott (1)

 

 

582

 

 

Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre Hotel (1)

 

 

461

 

Residence Inn Arlington Pentagon City

 

 

299

 

 

Chile

 

 

 

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner (1)

 

 

398

 

 

San Cristobal Tower, Santiago

 

 

139

 

Washington Dulles Airport Marriott (1)

 

 

368

 

 

Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center

 

 

379

 

Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles

 

 

336

 

 

Mexico

 

 

 

 

Washington

 

 

 

 

 

JW Marriott Hotel Mexico City (3)

 

 

312

 

Seattle Airport Marriott

 

 

459

 

 

New Zealand

 

 

 

 

The Westin Seattle

 

 

891

 

 

Novotel Auckland Ellerslie

 

 

147

 

W Seattle

 

 

424

 

 

ibis Ellerslie

 

 

100

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

Novotel Wellington

 

 

139

 

Grand Hyatt Washington

 

 

897

 

 

ibis Wellington

 

 

200

 

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill

 

 

836

 

 

Novotel Queenstown Lakeside

 

 

273

 

JW Marriott Washington D.C.

 

 

772

 

 

Novotel Christchurch Cathedral Square (1)

 

 

154

 

The Westin Georgetown, Washington, D.C.

 

 

267

 

 

ibis Christchurch (1)

 

 

155

 

Washington Marriott at Metro Center

 

 

459

 

 

Total

 

 

59,838

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Virginia (continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Australia

 

 

 

 

Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles

 

 

336

 

 

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf (1) (3)

 

 

384

 

Washington

 

 

 

 

 

Brazil

 

 

 

 

The Westin Seattle

 

 

891

 

 

      ibis Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico

 

 

256

 

W Seattle

 

 

424

 

 

JW Marriott Hotel Rio de Janeiro

 

 

245

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

      Novotel Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico

 

 

150

 

Grand Hyatt Washington

 

 

897

 

 

Canada

 

 

 

 

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill

 

 

838

 

 

Calgary Marriott Downtown

 

 

388

 

JW Marriott Washington DC

 

 

777

 

 

Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre Hotel (1)

 

 

461

 

The Westin Georgetown, Washington, D.C.

 

 

267

 

 

Mexico

 

 

 

 

Washington Marriott at Metro Center

 

 

459

 

 

JW Marriott Hotel Mexico City (3)

 

 

312

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

53,629

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The land on which this hotel is built is leased from a third party under one or more lease agreements.

(2)

The land, building and improvements are leased from a third party under a long-term lease agreement.

(3)

This property is not wholly owned.

By Market: The following table summarizes the composition of our consolidated hotels as of February 20, 2017 by market based on percentage of 2016 revenues:  

 

 

Number

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

of Hotels

 

 

Revenues (1)

 

Northeast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Boston

 

 

4

 

 

 

6

%

New York

 

 

8

 

 

 

16

%

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

22

%

Mid-Atlantic/Southeast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

12

 

 

 

10

%

Atlanta

 

 

5

 

 

 

3

%

Florida

 

 

9

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

24

%

Central

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chicago

 

 

6

 

 

 

3

%

Denver

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

%

Houston

 

 

4

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

6

%

West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seattle

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

%

San Francisco

 

 

6

 

 

 

7

%

Phoenix

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

%

Los Angeles

 

 

7

 

 

 

5

%

San Diego

 

 

4

 

 

 

9

%

Hawaii

 

 

3

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

33

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Domestic

 

 

11

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

%

Canada

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

%

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

3

%

___________

 

 

96

 

 

 

97

%

(1)

Our disposed hotels accounted for the remaining 3% of our 2016 revenues.


By Class:  We have focused on investing in the upper-upscale and luxury asset classes, as we believe they have broad appeal for both the leisure and business customer. We also may invest in other property types which we believe have the potential for strong demand growth, including urban select service. The following graph summarizes the composition of the 96 hotels in our consolidated portfolio based on the percentage of 2016 revenues represented by our luxury, upper upscale and other categories:    

By Type:  Our focus has been on major markets in urban and resort/conference destinations.  The following graph summarizes the composition of the 96 hotels in our consolidated portfolio based on the percentage of 2016 revenues represented by our property type categories:

Other Real Estate Interests

In addition to our consolidated hotel portfolio, we alsoWe own non-controlling interests in several entities that, as of February 14, 2014,20, 2017, owned, or owned an interest in, 2418 hotel properties, as detailed below. The operations of the properties owned by these entities are not consolidated and are included in equity in earnings in our consolidated results of operations. See Part II Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 3. Investments in Affiliates.”


European Joint Venture. We own a general and limited partnership interest in a joint venture in Europe (“Euro JV”) with APG Strategic Real Estate Pool NV, an affiliate of a Dutch Pension Fund (“APG”), and Jasmine Hotels Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (“GIC RE”). The Euro JV consists of two funds, which we refer to as Euro JV Fund I and Euro JV Fund II. WeII, in which we hold a 32.0%an approximate one-third interest through both general and limited partner interest and a 0.1% general partner interest in Euro JV Fund I and a 33.3% limited partner interest and a 0.1% general partner interest in Euro JV Fund II.interests. A subsidiary of Host L.P. acts as the asset manager for the hotels owned by the Euro JV as well as for one hotel in Paris, France, in exchange for a fee. As of February 14, 2014,20, 2017, the Euro JV owns the following hotels:

 

Hotel

 

City

 

Country

 

Rooms/Units

 

Fund I:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hotel Arts Barcelona

 

Barcelona

 

Spain

 

 

483

 

The Westin Palace, Madrid

 

Madrid

 

Spain

 

 

467

 

Sheraton Roma Hotel & Conference Center

Rome

Italy

640

The Westin Palace, Milan

Milan

Italy

227

The Westin Europa & Regina

Venice

Italy

185

Renaissance Brussels Hotel

Brussels

Belgium

262

Brussels Marriott Hotel Grand Place

 

Brussels

 

Belgium

 

 

221

Marriott Executive Apartments

Brussels

Belgium

56

Crowne Plaza Hotel Amsterdam City Centre

Amsterdam

The Netherlands

270

Sheraton Skyline Hotel & Conference Centre

Hayes

United Kingdom

350

Sheraton Warsaw Hotel & Towers

Warsaw

Poland

350

 

Fund I total rooms

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,5111,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11


Hotel

City

Country

Rooms/Units

 

Fund II:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paris Marriott Rive Gauche Hotel & Conference Center

 

Paris

 

France

 

 

757

Pullman Bercy Paris

Paris

France

396

 

Renaissance Paris La Defense Hotel

 

Paris

 

France

 

 

327

 

Renaissance Paris Vendome Hotel

 

Paris

 

France

 

 

97

 

Renaissance Amsterdam Hotel

 

Amsterdam

 

The Netherlands

 

 

402

 

Le Méridien Piccadilly

 

London

 

United Kingdom

 

 

280

Le Méridien Grand Hotel Nuremberg

Nuremberg

Germany

192283

 

Sheraton Stockholm Hotel

 

Stockholm

 

Sweden

 

 

465

 

Sheraton Berlin Grand Hotel Esplanade

Berlin

Germany

394

Fund II total rooms

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,9162,725

 

Total European joint venture rooms

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,4273,896

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture. We own a 25%9% indirect interest in athrough joint ventureventures (the “Asia/Pacific JV”) with RECO Hotels JV Private Limited, an affiliate of GIC RE. Our Asia/Pacific JV owns the 278-room Four Points by Sheraton Perth in Perth, Australia, which own five operating hotels and a 36% non-controlling interest in a joint venture in India with Accor S.A. and InterGlobe Enterprises Limited that owns two hotels with an additional five hotels under development,in the final stages of completion in India, totaling 1,750 rooms. The seven hotels in India are or will be operated under the Pullman, Novotel and ibis brands.

Other U.S. Real Estate Investments. Our other domestic real estate investments include the following:

We have a non-controlling 50% interest in a joint venture with White Lodging Services that developed and owns the 255-room Hyatt Place Nashville Downtown in Tennessee. The hotel opened in November 2013.

We have a non-controlling 50% interest in a joint venture with White Lodging Services that owns the 255-room Hyatt Place Nashville Downtown in Tennessee.

We have a non-controlling 67% interest in a joint venture with Hyatt Residential Group to develop, sell and operate a 131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa. The project is expected to open in late 2014.

We have a non-controlling 67% interest in a joint venture with HV Global Group, a subsidiary of Interval Leisure Group, to operate the Hyatt Ka’anapali Beach, A Hyatt Residence Club, a 131-unit vacation ownership development in Maui, Hawaii adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa.  

We have a non-controlling 11% interest in a joint venture that owns the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown following our January 10, 2014 sale of an 89% interest in the property based on a market value of $303 million. The property is subject to a mortgage loan of $230 million.

We have a non-controlling 11% interest in a joint venture that owns the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown following our January 10, 2014 sale of an 89% interest in the property.

We have a non-controlling 49.9% interest in a joint venture with R/V-C Association that owns the 650-room Fort Lauderdale Marriott Harbor Beach Resort and Spa in Florida.


Competition

The lodging industry is highly competitive. Competition often is specific to individual markets and is based on a number of factors, including location, brand, guest facilities and amenities, level of service, room rates and the quality of accommodations. The lodging industry is viewed as consisting of six different segments, each of which caters to a discrete set of customer tastes and needs: luxury, upper upscale,upscale, upscale, midscale (with and without food and beverage service) and economy. The classification of a property is based on lodging industry standards, which take into consideration many factors such as guest facilities and amenities, level of service and quality of accommodations. Most of our hotels operate in urban and resort markets either as luxury properties under such brand names as Fairmont®, Four SeasonsGrand Hyatt®, Grand HyattJW Marriott®, JW MarriottRitz-Carlton®, Ritz-CarltonSt. Regis®, St. RegisAutograph Collection®, Curio – A Collection by Hilton®, The Luxury Collection® and W®, or as upper upscale properties under such brand names as Embassy Suites®, Hilton®, Hyatt®, Le Méridien®, Marriott Executive Apartments®, Marriott Marquis®, Marriott Suites®, Pullman®, Renaissance®, Sheraton®, Swissôtel® and Westin®. We also may selectively invest in upscale and midscale properties such as Courtyard by Marriott®, Crowne PlazaHyatt Place®, Four Points by Sheratonibis®, Hyatt PlaceNovotel®, ibis®, Novotel® or Residence Inn by Marriott®, particularly in international markets.1(1)  While our hotels primarily compete with other hotels in the luxury and upper upscale segments, they also may compete with hotels in other lower-tier segments. In addition, many management contracts for our hotels do not prohibit our managers from converting, franchising or developing other hotel properties in our markets. As a result, our hotels compete with other hotels that our managers may own, invest in, manage or franchise.  

We believe our properties enjoy competitive advantages associated with the hotel brands under which they operate. The international marketing programs and reservation systems of these brands, combined with the strong management systems and expertise they provide, should enable our properties to perform favorably in terms of both occupancyoccupancy and room rates. In addition, repeat guest business is enhanced by guest reward or guest recognition programs offered by most of these brands.

1This annual report contains registered trademarks that are the exclusive property of their respective owners, which are companies other than us. None of the owners of these trademarks, their affiliates or any of their respective officers, directors, agents or employees, has or will have any responsibility or liability for any information contained in this annual report

12


We also compete with other REITs and other public and private investors for the acquisition of new properties and investment opportunities, both in domestic and international markets, as we attempt to position our portfolio to best take best advantage of changes in markets and travel patterns of our customers.

Seasonality

Our hotel sales traditionally have experienced moderate seasonality, which varies based on the individual property and the region. Hotel sales for our consolidated portfolio averaged approximately 24%25%, 27%, 23%24% and 26%24% for the first, second, third and fourth calendar quarters, respectively, in 2013.2016.

Environmental and Regulatory Matters

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances. These laws may impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of hazardous oror toxic materials, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with exposure to released hazardous or toxic materials. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require corrective or other expenditures. In connection with our current or prior ownership or operation of hotels, we potentially may be liable for various environmental costs or liabilities. Although currently we are not aware of any material environmental claims pending or threatened against us, we can offer no assurance that a material environmental claim will not be asserted against us in the future.

Operational Agreements

All of our hotels are managed by third parties pursuant to management or operating agreements, with some of such hotels also subject to separate license agreements addressing matters pertaining to operation under the designated brand. Under these agreements, the managers generally have sole responsibility and exclusive authority for all activities necessary for the day-to-day operation of the hotels, including establishing room rates, securing and processing reservations, procuring inventories, supplies and services, providing periodic inspection and consultation visits to the hotels by the managers’ technical and operational experts and promoting and publicizing the hotels. The managers provide all managerial and other employees for the hotels, review the operation and maintenance of the hotels, prepare reports, budgets and projections, and provide other administrative and accounting support services to the hotels. These support services include planning and policy services, divisional financial services, product planning and development, employee staffing and training, corporate executive management and certain in-house legal services. We have certain approval rights over budgets, capital expenditures, significant leases and contractual commitments, and various other matters.

General Terms and Provisions – Agreements governing the management and operation of our hotels typically include the terms described below:

Term and fees for operational services. The initial term of our management and operating agreements generally is 15 to 25 years, with one or more renewal terms at the option of the manager. The majority of our management agreements condition the manager’s right to exercise options for specified renewal terms upon the satisfaction of specified economic performance criteria. The manager typically receives compensation in the form of a base management fee, which is calculated as a percentage (generally 2-3%) of annual gross revenues, and an incentive management fee, which typically is calculated as a percentage (generally 10-20%) of operating profit after the owner has received a priority return on its investment in the hotel. In the case of our Starwood-managed hotels, the base management fee is only 1% of annual gross revenues, but that amount is supplemented by license fees payable to Starwood under a separate license agreement (as described below).

License services. In the case of our Starwood-managed hotels, the operation of the hotels is subject to separate license agreements addressing matters pertaining to the designated brand, including rights to use trademarks, service marks and logos, matters relating to compliance with certain brand standards and policies, and the provision of certain system programs and centralized services. Although the term of these license agreements with Starwood generally is coterminous with the corresponding operating agreements, the license agreements contemplate the potential for continued brand affiliation even in the event of a termination of the operating agreement. As noted above, the Starwood licensors receive compensation in the form of license fees (generally 5% of gross revenues attributable to room sales and 2% of gross revenues attributable to food and beverage sales), which amounts supplement the lower base management fee of 1% of gross revenues received by Starwood under the operating agreements.

Chain or system programs and services. Managers are required to provide chain or system programs and services generally that are furnished on a centralized basis. Such services include the development and operation of certain computer systems

13


and reservation services, regional or other centralized management and administrative services, marketing and sales programs and services, training and other personnel services, and other centralized or regional services as may be determined to be more efficiently performed on a centralized, regional or group basis rather than on an individual hotel basis. Costs and expenses incurred in providing these chain or system programs and services generally are allocated on a cost reimbursement basis among all hotels managed by the manager or its affiliates or that otherwise benefit from these services.

Working capital and fixed asset supplies. We are required to maintain working capital for each hotel and to fund the cost of certain fixed asset supplies (for example, linen, china, glassware, silver and uniforms). We also are responsible for providing funds to meet the cash needs for hotel operations if at any time the funds available from working capital are insufficient to meet the financial requirements of the hotels. For certain hotels, the working capital accounts which would otherwise be maintained by the managers for each of such hotels are maintained on a pooled basis, with managers being authorized to make withdrawals from such pooled account as otherwise contemplated with respect to working capital in accordance with the provisions of the management or operating agreements.

Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacements. We are required to provide the managers with all furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”) necessary for the operation of the hotels (including funding any required FF&E replacements). On an annual basis, the managers prepare budgets for FF&E to be acquired and certain routine repairs and maintenance to be performed in the next year and an estimate of the necessary funds, which budgets are subject to our review and approval. For purposes of funding such expenditures, a specified percentage (typically 5%) of the gross revenues of each hotel is deposited by the manager into an escrow or reserve account in our name, to which the manager has access. In the case of our Starwood-managed hotels, our operating agreements contemplate that this reserve account also may be used to fund the cost of certain major repairs and improvements affecting the hotel building (as described below). For certain of our Marriott-managed hotels, we have entered into an agreement with Marriott to allow for such expenditures to be funded from one pooled reserve account, rather than funds being deposited into separate reserve accounts at each hotel, with the minimum required balance maintained on an ongoing basis in that pooled reserve account being significantly below the amount that otherwise would have been maintained in such separate hotel reserve accounts. For certain of our Starwood-managed hotels, the periodic reserve fund contributions, which otherwise would be deposited into reserve accounts maintained by managers for each hotel, are distributed to us and, as to this pool of hotels, we are responsible for providing funding of expenditures which otherwise would be funded from reserve accounts for each of the subject hotels.

Building alterations, improvements and renewals. The managers are required to prepare an annual estimate of the expenditures necessary for major repairs, alterations, improvements, renewals and replacements to the structural, mechanical, electrical, heating, ventilating, air conditioning, plumbing and elevators of each hotel, along with alterations and improvements to the hotel as are required, in the manager’s reasonable judgment, to keep the hotel in a competitive, efficient and economical operating condition that is consistent with brand standards. We generally have approval rights as to such budgets and expenditures, which we review and approve based on our manager’s recommendations and on our judgment. Expenditures for these major repairs and improvements affecting the hotel building typically are funded directly by owners, although (as noted above) our agreements with Starwood contemplate that certain such expenditures may be funded from the reserve account.

Treatment of additional owner funding. As additional owner funding becomes necessary either for expenditures generally funded from the FF&E replacement funds, or for any major repairs or improvements to the hotel building which may be required to be funded directly by owners, most of our agreements provide for an economic benefit to us through an impact on the calculation of incentive management fees payable to our managers. One approach frequently utilized at our Marriott-managed hotels is to provide such owner funding through loans which are repaid, with interest, from operational revenues, with the repayment amounts reducing operating profit available for payment of incentive management fees. Another approach that is used at our Starwood-managed hotels, as well as with certain expenditures projects at our Marriott-managed hotels, is to treat such owner funding as an increase to our investment in the hotel, resulting in an increase to owner’s priority return with a corresponding reduction to the amount of operating profit available for payment of incentive management fees. For our Starwood-managed hotels that are subject to the pooled arrangement described above, the amount of any additional reserve account funding is allocated to each of such hotels on a pro rata basis, determined with reference to the net operating income of each hotel and the total net operating income of all such pooled hotels for the most recent operating year.

Territorial protections. Certain management and operating agreements impose restrictions for a specified period which limit the manager and its affiliates from owning, operating or licensing a hotel of the same brand within a specified area. The area restrictions vary with each hotel, from city blocks in urban areas to up to a multi-mile radius from the hotel in other areas.

Sale of the hotel. Subject to specific agreements as to certain hotels (see below under ‘Special Termination Rights’), we generally are limited in our ability to sell, lease or otherwise transfer the hotels by the requirement that the transferee assume the related management agreements and meet specified other conditions, including the condition that the transferee not be a competitor of the manager.

14


Performance Termination Rights. In addition to any right to terminate that may arise as a result of a default by the manager, most of our management and operating agreements include reserved rights by us to terminate management or operating agreements on the basis of the manager’s failure to meet certain performance-based metrics, typically including a specified threshold return on owner’s investment in the hotel, along with a failure of the hotel to achieve a specified RevPAR performance threshold established with reference to other competitive hotels in the market. Typically, such performance-based termination rights arise in the event the operator fails to achieve specified performance thresholds over a consecutive two-year period, and are subject to the manager’s ability to ‘cure’ and avoid termination by payment to us of specified deficiency amounts (or, in some instances, waiver of the right to receive specified future management fees). We have agreed in the past, and may agree in the future, to waive certain of these termination rights in exchange for consideration from a manager or its affiliates, which consideration may include cash compensation or amendments to management agreements.

Special Termination Rights. In addition to any performance-based or other termination rights set forth in our management and operating agreements, we have specific negotiated termination rights as to certain management and operating agreements. With respect to our Marriott portfolio, subject to certain timing and other limitations, these rights include termination rights applicable to 16 properties. With respect to our Starwood portfolio, subject to certain timing and other limitations, these rights include termination rights applicable to 8 properties. We also have similar termination rights applicable to 8 other properties.  While the brand affiliation of a property may increase the value of a hotel, the ability to dispose of a property unencumbered by a management agreement, or even brand affiliation, also can increase the value for prospective purchasers. These termination rights can take a number of different forms, including termination of agreements upon sale that leave the property unencumbered by any agreement; termination upon sale provided that the property continues to be operated under a license or franchise agreement with continued brand affiliation; as well as termination without sale or other condition, which may require payment of a fee. These termination rights also may restrict the number of agreements that may be terminated over any annual or other period; impose limitations on the number of agreements terminated as measured by EBITDA; require that a certain number of properties continue to maintain the brand affiliation; or be restricted to a specific pool of assets.  

Employees

As of December 31, 2013,February 20, 2017 we had 242220 employees, of which 218211 work in the United States.States, including our regional offices in Miami and San Diego. We had 249 employees located in our offices in London Rio de Janeiro, Amsterdam and Singapore.Amsterdam. None of Host’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, other than those working in our office in Rio de Janeiro.agreements. The number of employees referenced above does not include the hotel employees of our nine4 hotels in Brazil New Zealand and Australia, which, while technically are Host employees, are under the direct supervision and control of our third-party hotel managers. Our third-party managers are responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our hotels. Although we do not manage employees at our consolidated hotels, we still are subject to many of the costs and risks generally associated with the hotel labor force, particularly those hotels with unionized labor. We believe relations with the employees of these third party managers are positive. For a discussion of these relationships, see Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ unionized labor.”

(1)This annual report contains registered trademarks that are the exclusive property of their respective owners, which are companies other than us. None of the owners of these trademarks, their affiliates or any of their respective officers, directors, agents or employees, has or will have any responsibility or liability for any information contained in this annual report.  


Employees at certain of our third-party managed hotels are covered by collective bargaining agreements that are subject to review and renewal on a regular basis. For a discussion of these relationships, see Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ unionized labor.”  

Where to Find Additional Information

The address of our principal executive office is 6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817. Our phone number is 240-744-1000. We maintain an internet website at: www.hosthotels.com. Through our website, we make available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The public also may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.www.sec.gov.

Our website also is a key source of important information about us. We routinely post to the Investor Relations section of our website important information about our business, our operating results and our financial condition and prospects, including, for example, information about material acquisitions and dispositions, our earnings releases and certain supplemental financial information related or complimentary thereto. Theto our earnings releases. We also post to our website copies of investor presentations and we update those presentations periodically, which also contain important information about us. The website has a Governance page in the Investor RelationsOur Company section that includes, among other things, copies of our By-laws,Bylaws, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and Conflicts of Interest Policy for our directors,

15


our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy for employees, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters for each standing committee of Host Inc.’s Board of Directors, which currently areinclude the Audit Committee, the Compensation Policy Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Copies of these charters and policies, Host Inc.’s By-lawsBylaws and Host L.P.’s partnership agreement also are available in print to stockholders and unitholders upon request to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., 6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500, Bethesda, Maryland 20817, Attn: Secretary. Please note that the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered to be a part of, any document, unless expressly incorporated by reference therein.

 

Item  1A.

Risk Factors

For an enterprise as large and complex as we are, a wide range of factors could materially affect future results and performance. The statements in this section describe the major risks to our business and should be considered carefully. In addition, these statements constitute our cautionary statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Financial Risks and Risks of Operation

Our revenues and the value of our properties are subject to conditions affecting the lodging industry.

The lodging industry is subject to changes in the travel patterns of business and leisure travelers, both of which are affected by the strength of the economy, as well as other factors.  The performance of the lodging industry traditionally has traditionally been closely linked withaffected by the performancestrength of the general economy and, specifically, growth in gross domestic product (“GDP”). Because lodging industry demand typically follows the general economy, the lodging industry is cyclical and this cyclicality contributes to potentially large fluctuations in our financial condition and results of operations. Changes in travel patterns of both business and leisure travelers, particularly during periods of economic contraction or low levels of economic growth, may create difficulties for the industry over the long-term and adversely affect our results.  Theresults of operations.

In addition, the majority of our hotels are classified as luxury or upper upscale. In an economic downturn, these types of hotels may be more susceptible to a decrease in revenue, as compared to hotels in other categories that have lower room rates. This characteristic may result from the fact that these hotelsupscale and generally target business and high-end leisure travelers. In periods of economic difficulties, business and leisure travelers may seek to reduce travel costs by limiting travel or seeking to reduce costs onof their trips. DuringConsequently, our luxury or upper upscale hotels may be more susceptible to a decrease in revenue during an economic downturn, as compared to hotels in other categories that have lower room rates.  For instance, reductions in overall travel during the recession in 2008 and 2009 overall travel was reduced, which had a significant effect onsignificantly affected our results of operations. While operating results have improved since then, there continues to be uncertainty

Other circumstances affecting the lodging industry which may affect our performance and the forecasts we make include:

the effect on lodging demand of changes in national and local economic and business conditions, including concerns about the overallduration and strength of U.S. economic growth, global economic prospects, consumer confidence and the recovery in the United States, Europe and other partsvalue of the world.  Additionally, continued high unemployment has slowedU.S. dollar;

factors that may shape public perception of travel to a particular location, such as natural disasters, weather events, pandemics and outbreaks of contagious diseases such as the Zika virus, and the occurrence or potential occurrence of terrorist attacks, all of which will affect occupancy rates at our hotels and the demand for hotel products and services;


risks that the recent travel ban to the United States and proposed immigration policies will suppress international travel to the United States generally;

the impact of geopolitical developments outside the U.S., such as the pace of the economic recovery. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any increasesrecovery in hotel revenues or earnings at our properties will continue for any numberEurope, the effects of reasons, including, but not limitedthe United Kingdom’s referendum to slower than anticipatedwithdraw from the European Union, the slowing of growth in emerging markets such as China and Brazil, or unrest in the economy. Our resultsMiddle East, which could affect the relative volatility of operationsglobal credit markets generally, global travel and any forecastlodging demand, including with respect to our foreign hotel properties;

volatility in global financial and credit markets, and the impact of budget deficits and pending and future U.S. governmental action to address such deficits through reductions in spending and similar austerity measures, which could materially adversely affect U.S. and global economic conditions, business activity, credit availability, borrowing costs, and lodging demand;

operating risks associated with the hotel business, including the effect of increasing operating or labor costs or changes in workplace rules that affect labor costs;

the ability of our hotels to compete effectivelyagainst other lodging businesses in the highly competitive markets in which we make,operate in areas such as access, location, quality of accommodations and room rate structures;

changes in the desirability of the geographic regions of the hotels in our portfolio or in the travel patterns of hotel customers;

changes in taxes and governmental regulations that influence or set wages, hotel employee health care costs, prices, interest rates or construction and maintenance procedures and costs;

the ability of third-party internet and other travel intermediaries to attract and retain customers; and

decreases in the frequency of business travel that may be affected by, and can change based on, a variety ofresult from alternatives to in-person meetings, including virtual meetings hosted online or over private teleconferencing networks.

We cannot assure you that adverse changes in the general economy or other circumstances that affect the lodging industry including:

changes in the international, national, regional and local economic climate;

changes in business and leisure travel patterns;

the effect of terrorist attacks and terror alerts in the United States and internationally, as well as other geopolitical disturbances;

supply growth in markets where we own hotels, which may adversely affect demand at our properties;

the attractiveness of our hotels to consumers relative to competing hotels;

the performance of the managers of our hotels;

outbreaks of disease and the impact on travel of natural disasters and weather;

physical damage to our hotels as a result of earthquakes, hurricanes, or other natural disasters, or the income lost as a result of the damage;

changes in room rates and increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors; and

unionization of the labor force at our hotels.

will not have an adverse effect on the hotel revenue or earnings at our properties. A reduction in our revenue or earnings as a result of the above risks may reduce our working capital and revenue, impact our long-term business strategy and impact the value of our assets and our ability to meet certain covenants in our existing debt agreements.

In addition, continued political uncertainty and changes in government policies, in particular with respect to U. S. economic policy, federal budget deficit concerns, and the slowdown in the Federal Reserve’s bond buying program could have material adverse impacts on financial markets and economic conditions in the United States and throughout the world. This in turn could, directly or indirectly, adversely affect lodging demand and therefore our business and financial condition. In addition, U.S. government travel is approximately 5% of our business, andwe may suffer as a result of U.S. federal spending cuts resulting from  regulations reducing the amount of travel by U.S. government employees and contractors.  In 2013 we experienced weakened government demand for our hotel rooms in some markets such as Washington, D.C., which may continue, depending on factors such as the outcome of U.S. Federal budget negotiations.

16


Disruptions in the financial markets may affect adversely our business and results of operations, our ability to obtain financing on reasonable and acceptable terms, and our ability to hedge our foreign currency exchange risk.

The United States and global equity and credit markets have experienced and may in the future experience significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions.  This may cause the market price of the stock of many companies to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective and outstanding debt financings to widen considerably. In the event these disruptions occur, liquidity in the financial markets will be affected, which may make terms for financings less attractive, and, in some cases, result in the lack of availability of certain types of financing. Uncertainty regarding the stability of the equity and credit markets may impact negatively our ability to access additional short-term and long-term financing on reasonable terms or at all, which would impact negatively our liquidity and financial condition. A prolonged downturn in the stock or credit markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing and may impact negatively our ability to enter into derivative contracts in order to hedge risks associated with changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.  While we believe we have adequate sources of liquidity with which to meet our anticipated requirements for working capital, debt service and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future, if our operating results weaken significantly and our cash flow or capital resources prove inadequate, or if interest rates increase significantly, we could face liquidity problems that could affect materially and adversely our results of operations and financial condition.

Economic conditions may affect adversely the value of our hotels which may result in impairment charges on our properties.

We analyze our assets for impairment throughout the year when events or circumstances occur that indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable.  For example, we analyze our assets for impairments when a property has current or projected losses from operations, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, or when other material trends, contingencies or changes in circumstances indicate that a triggering event has occurred, such that an asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. For impaired assets, we record an impairment charge equal to the excess of the property’s carrying value over its fair value. We may incur additional impairment charges in the future, which charges will affect negatively our results of operations. We can provide no assurance that any impairment loss recognized wouldwill not be material to our results of operations. For information on impairment charges taken

In addition to general economic conditions affecting the lodging industry, new hotel room supply is an important factor that can affect the lodging industry’s performance and overbuilding has the potential to further exacerbate the negative impact of an economic downturn.  Room rates and occupancy, and thus RevPAR, tend to increase when demand growth exceeds supply growth.  A reduction or slowdown in 2013the growth of lodging demand or increased growth in lodging supply could result in returns that are substantially below expectations or result in losses which could materially and 2012, see Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussionadversely affect our revenues and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies.”profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.

We depend on external sources of capital for future growth and we may be unablegrowth; therefore, any disruption to our ability to access capital when necessary.at times, and on terms reasonably acceptable to us, may affect adversely our business and results of operations.

Unlike regular C corporations,Since we have elected REIT status, Host Inc. must finance its growth and fund debt repayments largely with external sources of capital because it is required to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its taxable income (other than net capital gain) in order to qualify as a REIT, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to which it does not receive cash. Funds used by Host Inc. to make required distributions are provided throughby distributions from Host L.P. Our ability to access external capital could be hampered by a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control, includingincluding:

price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the U.S. and global equity and credit market conditions as discussed above, unfavorablemarkets;

changes in market perception of our growth potential, including rating agency downgrades by Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or Fitch Ratings;

decreases in our current andor estimated future earnings,earnings;

decreases or decreasesfluctuations in the market price of the common stock of Host Inc. Our ability to access additional capital also may be limited by ;

increases in interest rates; and

the terms of our existing indebtedness which, under certain circumstances, restrict our incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends and Host L.P. distributions. debt.


The occurrence of any of these factors, individually or in combination, could prevent us from being able to obtain the external capital we require on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to finance our future growth.growth and on our results of operations and financial condition.  Potential consequences of disruptions in U.S. and global equity and credit markets and, as a result, an inability for us to access external capital at times, and on terms, reasonably acceptable to us could include:

a need to seek alternative sources of capital with less attractive terms, such as more restrictive covenants and shorter maturity;

adverse effects on our financial condition and liquidity, and our ability to meet our anticipated requirements for working capital, debt service and capital expenditures;

higher costs of capital;

an inability to enter into derivative contracts in order to hedge risks associated with changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; or

an inability to execute on our acquisition strategy.

We operate in a highly competitive industry.

The lodging industry is highly competitive. Our principal competitors are other owners and investors in upper upscale and luxury full-service hotels, including other lodging REITs. Our hotels face strong competition for individual guests, group reservations and conference business from major hospitality chains with well-established and recognized brands as well as from other smaller hotel chains, independent and local hotel owners and operators. We compete for customers based primarily on brand name recognition and reputation, as well as location, room rates, property size and availability of rooms and conference space, quality of the accommodations, customer satisfaction, amenities and the ability to earn and redeem loyalty program points. New hotels may be constructed and these additions to supply create new competitors, in some cases without corresponding increases in demand for hotel rooms. Our competitors may have similar or greater commercial and financial resources which allow them to improve their properties in ways that affect our ability to compete for guests effectively and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.

We also compete for hotel acquisitions with entities that have similar investment objectives as we do. This competition could limit the number of investment opportunities that we find suitable for our business.  It may also increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell to us, making it more difficult for us to acquire new properties on attractive terms or on the terms contemplated in our business plan.

There are inherent risks with investments in real estate, including the relative illiquidity of real estate investments.

Investments in real estate are inherently illiquid and cannot generally be quickly sold.  For this reason, we cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any hotel that we desire to sell for the price or on terms acceptable to us, or the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close on the sale of a hotel. Therefore, we may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions and dispose of assets at opportune times or on favorable terms, which may adversely affect our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.

In addition, real estate ownership is subject to various risks, including:

government regulations relating to real estate ownership or operations, including tax, environmental, zoning and eminent domain laws;

loss in value of real estate due to changes in market conditions or the area in which real estate is located;

potential civil liability for accidents or other occurrences on owned or leased properties;

the ongoing need for owner-funded capital improvements and expenditures to maintain or upgrade properties;

periodic total or partial closures due to renovations and facility improvements;

changes in tax laws and property taxes, or an increase in the assessed valuation of a property for real estate tax purposes; and

force majeure events, such as earthquakes, floods or other possibly uninsured losses.


We have substantial debt and may incur additional debt.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we and our subsidiaries had total indebtedness of approximately $4.8$3.6 billion. Our substantial indebtedness requires us to dedicatecommit a significant portion of our annual cash flow from operations to debt service payments, which reduces the availability of our cashcash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, expansion efforts, dividends and distributions and other general corporate needs. Additionally, our substantial indebtedness could:

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness;

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness;

limit our ability in the future to undertake refinancings of our debt or to obtain financing for expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate needs on terms and conditions acceptable to us, if at all; or

limit our ability in the future to undertake refinancings of our debt or to obtain financing for expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate needs on terms and conditions acceptable to us, if at all; or

affect adversely our ability to compete effectively or operate successfully under adverse economic conditions.

affect adversely our ability to compete effectively or operate successfully under adverse economic conditions.

If our cash flow and working capital are not sufficient to fund our expenditures or service our indebtedness, we will be required to raise additional funds through:

sales of Host L.P.’s OP units or Host Inc.’s common stock;

sales of Host L.P.’s OP units or Host Inc.’s common stock;

the incurrence of additional permitted indebtedness by Host L.P.; or

the incurrence of additional permitted indebtedness by Host L.P.; or

sales of our assets.

17


the sale of our assets.

We cannot make any assurances that any of these sources of funds will be available to us or, if available, will be on terms that we would find acceptable or in amounts sufficient to meet our obligations or fulfill our business plan. Under certain circumstances, we would be required to use the cash from somegenerated by any or all of the events described aboveabove to repay other indebtedness.

The terms of our debtindebtedness and preferred units place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and these restrictions reduce our operational flexibility and create default risks.

TheWe are, and may in the future become, party to agreements and instruments that place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries.  For instance, the covenants in the documents governing the terms of our senior notes and our credit facility contain covenants that place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries. These covenants restrict, among other things, our ability to:

conduct acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, unless the successor entity in such transaction assumes our indebtedness;

execute acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, unless the successor entity in such transaction assumes our indebtedness;

incur additional debt in excess of certain thresholds and without satisfying certain financial metrics;

incur additional debt in excess of certain thresholds and without satisfying certain financial metrics;

create liens securing indebtedness, unless an effective provision is made to secure our other indebtedness by such liens;

incur liens securing indebtedness, unless an effective provision is made to secure our other indebtedness by such liens;

sell assets without using the proceeds from such sales for certain permitted uses or to make an offer to repay or repurchase outstanding indebtedness;

sell assets without using the proceeds from such sales for certain permitted uses or to make an offer to repay or repurchase outstanding indebtedness;

make distributions without satisfying certain financial metrics; and

pay dividends on classes and series of Host Inc. capital stock and pay distributions on Host L.P.’s classes of units without satisfying certain financial metrics concerning leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage; and

conduct transactions with affiliates other than on an arm’s length basis and, in certain instances, without obtaining opinions as to the fairness of such transactions.

conduct transactions with affiliates other than on an arm’s length basis and, in certain instances, without obtaining opinions as to the fairness of such transactions.

In addition, certain covenants in our credit facility also require us and our subsidiaries to meet financial performance tests.metrics. The restrictive covenants in the applicable indenture(s), the credit facility and the documents governing our other debt (including our mortgage debt) will reduce our flexibility in conducting our operationsoperations and will limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interest. Failure to comply with these restrictive covenants could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all or a substantial portion of our debt. In addition, certain of our mortgage debt requires that, to the extent cash flow from the hotels which secure such debt drops below stated levels, we escrow cash flow after the payment of debt service until operations improve above the stated levels.  In some cases, the lender may apply the escrowed amount to the outstanding balance of the mortgage debt. If such provisions are triggered, the amounts required to be escrowed may affect negatively our liquidity from these mortgaged properties by limiting our access to cash flow after debt service. For a detailed description of the covenants and restrictions imposed by the documents governing our indebtedness, see Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Operations—Financial Condition.”

Our ability to pay dividends and to make distributions may be limited or prohibited by the terms of our indebtedness or preferred units.

We are, and may in the future become, party to agreements and instruments that restrict or prevent the payment of dividends on classes and series of Host Inc. capital stock and Host L.P.’s payment of distributions on its classes of units. Under the terms of Host L.P.’s credit facility, distributions to Host L.P. unitholders, including Host Inc., upon which Host Inc. depends in order to obtain the cash necessary to pay dividends, are permitted only to the extent that Host L.P. can satisfy certain financial covenant tests (concerning leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage) and meet other requirements. We also will be subject to similar restrictions under the terms of our senior notes if our senior notes are no longer rated investment grade. We are, however, permitted under our credit facility and senior notes indenture to make distributions of estimated taxable income that are necessary to maintain Host Inc.’s REIT status.

Under the terms of Host L.P.’s outstanding preferred OP units, we are not permitted to make distributions on our common OP units unless all cumulative distributions have been paid (or funds for payment have been set aside for payment) on our preferred OP units. In the event that we fail to pay the accrued distributions on our preferred OP units for any reason, including any restriction on making such distributions under the terms of our debt instruments (as discussed above), distributions will continue to accrue on such preferred OP units and we will be prohibited from making any distributions on our common OP units until all such accrued but unpaid distributions on our preferred OP units have been paid (or funds for such payment have been set aside).

An increase in interest rates would increase the interest costs on our credit facility and on our floating rate debt and could impact adversely our ability to refinance existing debt or sell assets.

Interest payments for borrowings on our credit facility and the mortgages on certain properties and fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps linked to two other properties are based on floating rates. As a result, an increase in interest rates will reduce our cash flow available for other corporate purposes, including investments in our portfolio. Further, risingAs of December 31, 2016, approximately 35% of our debt is subject to floating interest rates.

Rising interest rates also could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures and increase interest costs on any debt that is refinanced. We may from time to time enter into

18


agreements such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate


hedging contracts. Currently, the majority of our mortgages with floating rates, including mortgages on our joint venture properties, are fully or partially hedged through the use of floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps or interest rate caps and floors. While thesecaps. These agreements may lessen the impact of rising interest rates, they also expose us to the risk that other parties to the agreements will not perform or that the agreements will be unenforceable. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amount third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to dispose of assets as part of our business strategy.

Rating agency downgrades may increase our cost of capital.

Our senior notes are rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Fitch Ratings. These independent rating agencies may elect to downgrade their ratings on our senior notes at any time. Such downgrades may affect negatively our access to the capital markets and increase our cost of capital.

Our expenses may not decrease if our revenue decreases.

Many of the expenses associated with owning and operating hotels, such as debt-service payments, property taxes, insurance, utilities, and employee wages and benefits, are relatively inflexible andinflexible. They do not necessarily decrease in tandemdirectly with a reduction in revenue at the hotels.hotels and may be subject to increases that are not tied to the performance of our hotels or the increase in the rate of inflation generally. Also, as of December 31, 2016, 26 of our hotels are subject to third-party ground leases, which generally require periodic increases in ground rent payments. Our expenses also willability to pay these rents could be affected by inflationaryadversely if our hotel revenues do not increase at the same or a greater rate than the increases andin rental payments under the ground leases.

Additionally, certain costs, such as wages, benefits and insurance, may exceed the rate of inflation in any given period. In the event of a significant decrease in demand, our hotel managers may not be able to reduce the size of hotel work forces in order to decrease wages and benefits. Our managers also may be unable to offset any suchfixed or increased expenses with higher room rates. Any of our efforts to reduce operating costs or failure to make scheduled capital expenditures also could adversely affect the future growth of our business and the value of our hotel properties.

Our acquisition of additional properties may have a significant effect on our business, liquidity, financial position and/or results of operations.

As part of our business strategy, we seek primarily to acquire luxury and upper upscale hotel properties. We may acquire properties through various structures, including transactions involving portfolios, single assets, joint ventures and acquisitions of all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs or similar real estate ownership entities. We anticipate that our acquisitions will be financed throughwith a combinationcombination of methods and a variety of sources of external capital, including proceeds from Host Inc. equity offerings, issuance of limited partnership interests of Host L.P., advances under our credit facility, the incurrence or assumption of indebtedness and proceeds from the salessale of assets. To the extent there are disruptions in credit markets, itOur inability to access external sources of capital may limit our ability to finance acquisitionsacquisitions. For a discussion of factors that may limit our access to sources of capital, see “—We depend on external sources of capital for future growth; therefore, any disruption to our ability to access capital at times, and on terms reasonably acceptable to us, may affect adversely our business and results of operations.”  In addition, certain of these factors, such as disruption in the global capital markets, may limit the ability of purchasers to finance their acquisition of our hotels and therefore our ability to use disposition proceeds to finance our acquisitions.

We routinely are actively engaged in the process of identifying, analyzing and negotiating possible acquisition transactions. We cannot provide any assurances that we will be successful in consummating future acquisitions on favorable terms or that we will realize the benefitsbenefits that we anticipate from such acquisitions. Our inability to consummate one or more acquisitions on such terms, or our failure to realize the intended benefits from one or more acquisitions could have a significant adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial position and/or results of operations, including as a resultoperations. These adverse effects may occur because the performance of our incurrence ofthe property does not support the additional indebtedness and related interest expense that we incurred as a result of the acquisition. In addition, assets and our assumption of unforeseenentities that we have acquired, or may in the future acquire, may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers.  In general, the representations and warranties provided under the transaction agreements may not survive long enough for us to become aware of such liabilities and to seek recourse against our sellers and indemnification covering representations and warranties often is limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible or an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. The total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with acquired hotels and entities may exceed our expectations, plus we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may affect adversely our revenues, expenses, operating results and financial condition. Finally, indemnification agreements between us and the sellers typically provide that the sellers will retain certain specified liabilities relating to the assets and entities acquired by us. While the sellers generally are contractually obligated to pay all losses and other expenses relating to such retained liabilities without regard to survival limitations, materiality thresholds, deductibles or caps on losses, there can be no guarantee that such arrangements will not require us to incur losses or other expenses in connection with completed acquisitions.addition to those incurred by the sellers.


We may not achieve the value we anticipate from new hotel developments or value enhancement projects at our existing hotels.

We currently are, and in the future may be, involved in the construction or development of hotel properties, timeshare units or other alternate uses of portions of our existing properties, including the development of retail, office or apartments, including through joint ventures. There are risks inherent in any new development, including:

We may not obtain the zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations necessary to complete the development. A delay in receiving these approvals could affect adversely the returns we expect to receive.  

We may not obtain the zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations necessary to complete the development. A delay in receiving these approvals could affect adversely the returns we expect to receive.  

Any new construction involves the possibility of construction delays and cost overruns that may increase project costs.

Any new construction involves the possibility of construction delays and cost overruns that may increase project costs.

Defects in design or construction may result in delays and additional costs to remedy the defect or require a portion of a property to be closed during the period required to rectify the defect.

Defects in design or construction may result in delays and additional costs to remedy the defect or require a portion of a property to be closed during the period required to rectify the defect.

We may not be able to meet the loan covenants in any financing obtained to fund the new development, creating default risks.  

We may not be able to meet the loan covenants in any financing obtained to fund the new development, creating default risks.  

The development of timeshare units could become less attractive due to decreases in demand for residential, fractional or interval ownership, increases in mortgage rates and/or decreases in mortgage availability, market absorption or oversupply, with the result that we may not be able to sell the timeshares for a profit or at the prices or selling pace we anticipate.  

Natural or manmade disasters may delay construction or increase construction costs.

Risks related to change in economic and market conditions between development commencement and stabilization.

The development of timeshare units could become less attractive due to decreases in demand for residential, fractional or interval ownership, increases in mortgage rates and/or decreases in mortgage availability, market absorption or oversupply, with the result that we may not be able to sell the timeshares for a profit or at the prices or selling pace we initially anticipated.  

19


In addition, to the extent that developments are conducted through joint ventures, this creates additional risks, including the possibility that our partners may not meet their financial obligations or could have or develop business interests, policies or objectives that are inconsistent with ours. See “—We may acquire hotel properties through joint ventures with third parties that could resultresult in conflicts.”

Any of the above factors could affect adversely our and our partners’ ability to complete the developments on schedule and along the scope that currently is contemplated, or to achieve the intended value of these projects. For these reasons, there can be no assurances as to the value to be realized by the companyus from these transactions or any future similar transactions.

We do not control our hotel operations and we are dependent on the managers of our hotels.

To maintain our status as a REIT, we are not permitted to operate any of our hotels. As a result, we have entered into management agreements with third-party managers to operate our hotel properties. For this reason, we are unable to directly implement strategic business decisions with respect to the daily operation and marketing of our hotels, such as decisions with respect to the setting of room rates, repositioning of a hotel, food and beverage pricing and certain similar matters. Although we consult with our hotel operators with respect to strategic business plans, the hotel operators are under no obligation to implement any of our recommendations with respect to these matters. While we monitor the hotel managers’ performance, we have limited recourse under our management agreements if we believe that the hotel managers are not performing adequately. The cash flow from our hotels may be affected adversely if our managers fail to provide quality services and amenities or if they or their affiliates fail to maintain a quality brand name.  Because our management agreements are long term agreements,long-term in nature, we also may not be able to terminate these agreements if we believe the manager is not performing adequately.

From time to time, we have had, and continue to have, differences with the managers of our hotels over their performance and compliance with the terms of our management agreements. We generally resolve issues with our managers through discussions and negotiations. However, if we are unable to reach satisfactory results through discussionsdiscussions and negotiations, we may choose to litigate the dispute or submit the matter to third-party dispute resolution. Failure by our hotel managers to fully perform the duties agreed to in our management agreements or the failure of our managers to adequately manage the risks associated with hotel operations including cyber-security risks, could affect adversely our results of operations.

In addition, our hotel managers or their affiliates manage, and in some cases own, have invested in, or provided credit support or operating guarantees, to hotels that compete with our hotels, all of which may result in conflicts of interest. As a result, our hotel managers have in the past made, and may in the future make, decisions regarding competing lodging facilitiesfacilities that are not or would not be in our best interest.

Furthermore, our management agreements for our brand managed properties generally have provisions that can restrict our ability to sell, lease or otherwise transfer our hotels, unless the transferee is not a competitor of the manager and the transferee assumes the related management agreements and meets specified other conditions. Our ability to finance or sell our properties,


depending upon the structure of such transactions, may require the manager’s consent. Similarly, decisions with respect to the repositioning of a hotel, such as the outsourcing of food and beverage outlets, may require the manager’s consent.

The properties managed by Marriott International account for most of our revenues and operating income. Adverse developments in Marriott’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a material adverse effect on us.

On September 23, 2016, Marriott International completed its acquisition of Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, bringing Starwood’s brands under Marriott’s management. As a result of the merger, approximately 78% of our properties (as measured by revenues) now are managed or franchised by Marriott. We rely on Marriott’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage and maintain our hotel operations efficiently, effectively, profitably and in compliance with the terms, responsibilities and duties of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Any adverse developments in Marriott’s business and affairs or financial condition could impair its ability to manage our properties and could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, the integration of Starwood’s brands under Marriott management may expose us to additional risks and costs at our properties, and will place a significant burden on Marriott’s management and internal resources and the potential for diversion of its attention from the day-to-day business operations of its hotels, including hotels owned by us.

We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ unionized labor.

Our third-party managers are responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our hotels. Although we do not directly employ or manage employees at our consolidated hotels (other than employing, but not managing associatesor supervising, the employees at our propertiesproperties in Brazil New Zealand and Australia), we still areremain subject to many of the costs and risks generally associated with the hotel labor force, particularly at those hotels with unionized labor. From time to time, hotel operations may be disrupted as a result of strikes, lockouts, public demonstrations or other negative actions and publicity. We also may incur increased legal costs and indirect labor costs as a result of contract disputes involving our third-party managers and their labor force or other events. The resolution of labor disputes or re-negotiated labor contracts could lead to increased labor costs, a significant component of our hotel operating costs, either by increases in wages or benefits or by changes in work rules that raise hotel operating costs. As we are not the employer nor bound by any collective bargaining agreement, we do not negotiate with any labor organization, and it is the responsibility of each property’s manager to enter into such labor contracts. Our ability, if any, to have any materialmeaningful impact on the outcome of these negotiations is restricted by and dependent on the individual management agreement covering a specific property and we may have little ability to control the outcome of these negotiations.

Our hotels have an ongoing need for renovations and potentially significant capital expenditures in order to remain competitive in the marketplace, maintain brand standards or to comply with applicable laws or regulations. The timing and costs of such renovations or improvements may result in reduced operating performance during construction and may not improve the return on these investments.

We are required by our loan agreements or agreements with our hotel managers to make agreed upon capital expenditures. In addition, we will need to make further capital expenditures in order to remain competitive with other hotels, to maintain the economic value of our hotels and to comply with applicable laws and regulations. The timing of these improvements can affect hotel performance, particularlyparticularly if the improvements require closure of a significant number of rooms or other features of the hotels, such as ballrooms, meeting space and restaurants. These capital improvements reduce the availability of cash for other purposes and are subject to cost overruns and delays. In addition, because we depend on external sources of capital, we may not have the necessary funds to invest and, if we fail to maintain our properties in accordance with brand standards set by our managers, the managerthey may

20


terminate the management agreement. Moreover, we may not necessarily realize a significant, or any, improvement in the performance of the hotels in which we make these investments.

Our hotels are geographically concentrated in a limited number of large urban cities and, accordingly, we could be disproportionately harmed by adverse changes to these markets, a natural disaster or threat of a terrorist attack.

The concentration of our hotels in a limited number of large urban cities exposes us to greater risk to local economic or business conditions, changes in hotel supply in these cities, and other conditions than more geographically diversified hotel companies. Hotels in New York, Washington, D.C., San Diego, San Francisco, Boston, Florida, Hawaii, Atlanta, and Los Angeles represented approximately 72% of our 2016 revenues. An economic downturn, an increase in hotel supply in these cities, a natural disaster, a terrorist attack or similar disaster in any one of these cities likely would cause a decline in the hotel market and adversely affect occupancy rates, the financial performance of our hotels in these cities and our overall results of operations. For example, in October 2012, our operations in New York City and other East Coast properties were impacted negatively by Hurricane Sandy.  In 2013, decreased U.S. government demand for hotel rooms (approximately 5% of our business) in markets such as Washington, D.C. had a negative impact on our results of operations.


The threat of terrorism also may negatively impact hotel occupancy and average daily rate, due to resulting disruptions in business and leisure travel patterns and concerns about travel safety. Hotels in major metropolitan areas, such as the major cities that represent our target markets, may be particularly adversely affected due to concerns about travel safety. The possibility of future attacks may hamper business and leisure travel patterns and, accordingly, the performance of our business and our operations.

The ownership of hotels outside the United States and the expansion of our business into new markets outside of the United States will expose us to risks related to owning hotels in those international markets.

Part of our business strategy is to expand our presence outside of the United States. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we own directly 157 hotels located outside of the United States. We also are party to a joint venture that owns 1910 hotels in Europe and to a joint venture that owns one hotel in Australia and a non-controlling interest in twofive hotels currently open and fivetwo hotels inunder development in India. We may have difficulty managing our expansion into new geographic markets where we have limited knowledge and understanding of the local economy, an absence of business relationships in the area, or unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures and regulations. There are risks inherent in conducting business outside of the United States, which include:

employment laws and practices;

risks of non-compliance with varied and unfamiliar employment laws and practices;

tax laws, which may provide for income or other taxes or tax rates that exceed those of the U.S. and which may provide that foreign earnings that are repatriated, directly or indirectly, are subject to dividend withholding tax requirements or other restrictions and which may affect our ability to repatriate non-U.S. earnings in a tax efficient manner;

tax laws, which may provide for income or other taxes or tax rates that exceed those of the U.S. and which may provide that foreign earnings that are repatriated, directly or indirectly, are subject to dividend withholding tax requirements or other restrictions and which may affect our ability to repatriate non-U.S. earnings in a tax efficient manner;

compliance with and unexpected changes in regulatory requirements or monetary policy;

compliance with and unexpected changes in regulatory requirements or monetary policy;

the willingness of domestic or international lenders to provide financing and changes in the availability, cost and terms of such financing;

the willingness of domestic or international lenders to provide financing and changes in the availability, cost and terms of such financing;

adverse changes in local, political, economic and market conditions;

rapid adverse changes in local, political, economic and market conditions;

insurance coverage related to terrorist events;

the ability to obtain insurance coverage related to terrorist events;

changes in interest rates and/or currency exchange rates and difficulties in hedging these risks;

changes of interest rates and/or currency exchange rates and hyperinflation or deflation and difficulties in hedging these risks;

regulations regarding the incurrence of debt;

regulations regarding the incurrence of debt;

difficulties involved in managing an organization doing business in many different countries; and

difficulties involved in managing an organization doing business in many different countries; and

difficulties in complying with U.S. rules governing REITs while operating outside of the United States.

difficulties in complying with U.S. rules governing REITs while operating outside of the United States.

Any of these factors could affect adversely our ability to obtain all of the intended benefits of our international country expansion. If we do not effectively manage this expansion and successfully integrate the international hotels into our organization, our operating results and financial condition may bebe adversely affected.

We may acquire hotel properties through joint ventures with third parties that could result in conflicts.

We have made investments in joint ventures and are exploring further investment opportunities in the United States Asia, Europe and Latin America.internationally. We may, from time to time, invest as a co-venturer in other entities holding hotel properties instead of purchasing hotel properties directly. We also may sell interests in existing properties to a third party as part of forming a joint venture with suchthe third party. Investments in joint ventures may involve risks not present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Co-venturers often share control over the operation of a joint venture. Actions by a co-venturer also could subject the assets to additional risks as a result of any of the following circumstances:

our co-venturer might have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our, or the joint venture’s, interests or goals; or

our co-venturer might have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our, or the joint venture’s, interests or goals; or

our co-venturer may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests, or contrary to our policies or objectives.

our co-venturer may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests, or contrary to our policies or objectives.

Although generally we will seek to maintain sufficient control of anyFor certain joint venture in order to permit our objectives to be achieved,ventures, we might not be able to take action without the approval of our joint venture partners. Disputes between us and our partners or co-venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and preventmay negatively impact operations.

Although our officers from focusing their time and effortjoint ventures may generate positive cash flow, in some cases they may be unable to distribute that cash to the joint venture partners due to tax laws or other restrictions on our business.

Our management agreements could affect the sale or financing of our hotels.

Under the terms of our management agreements, we generally may not sell, lease or otherwise transfer our hotels unless the transferee is not a competitor of the manager and the transferee assumes the related management agreements and meets specified other

21


conditions. Our ability to financerepatriate non U.S. earnings in a tax efficient manner.  Additionally, in some cases our joint venture partners share control over distributions and may choose to retain capital in the joint


venture rather than to distribute it. Because our ability to generate liquidity from our joint ventures depends in part on their ability to distribute capital to us, our failure to receive distributions from our joint ventures could reduce our cash flow return on these investments.

The growth of internet reservation channels could adversely affect our business.

A significant percentage of hotel rooms for individual or sell“transient” customers are booked through internet travel intermediaries. Search engines and peer-to-peer inventory sources also provide online travel services that compete with our properties, depending upon the structure of such transactions,hotels. If bookings shift to higher cost distribution channels, including these internet travel intermediaries, it could materially impact our revenues and profitability. Additionally, as intermediary bookings increase, these intermediaries may require the manager’s consent. If the manager does not consent to such sale or financing, we may be precluded from taking actions in our best interest.

We may not be able to recover fully under our existing terrorism insurance program for losses caused by some types of terrorist acts, and neither U. S. nor foreign terrorism insurance laws or regulations ensure that we will be able to obtain terrorismhigher commissions, reduced room rates or other significant contract concessions from the brands and hotel management companies operating our hotels. Also, although internet travel intermediaries traditionally have competed to attract transient business rather than group and convention business, in recent years they have expanded their business to include marketing to large group and convention business. If that growth continues, it could both divert group and convention business away from our hotels and also increase our cost of sales for group and convention business. Consolidation of internet travel intermediaries, and the entry of major internet companies into the internet travel bookings business, also could divert bookings away from the websites of our hotel managers and increase our cost of sales.

Full insurance in adequate amounts or at acceptable premium levels in the future.recovery for terrorist acts may not be possible.  

We generally obtain terrorism insurance to cover property damage caused by acts of terrorism under separate standalone policies of insurance as well as policies on U.S. properties which currently are subject to U.S. federal government cost sharing as provided in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program ReauthorizationReauthorization Act (“TRIPRA”)., which has been extended through December 31, 2020. We also have terrorism insurance under our general liability program and in our program for directors’ and officers’ coverage. We also obtain terrorism insurance to cover some of our foreign properties through insurance programs involving or administered by foreign governments. We may not be able to recover fully under our existing terrorism insurance policies for losses caused by some types of terrorist acts, and neither U.S. nor foreign terrorism insurance legislation or regulations ensure that we will be able to obtain terrorism insurance in adequate amounts or at acceptable premium levels in the future. TRIPRA is due to expire on December 31, 2014. There is no assurance that terrorism insurance will be readily available or affordable before or after expiration of TRIPRA in December 2014 or that TRIPRA will not be modified, repealed or allowed to expire.

While TRIPRA allows direct insurers to be reimbursed for certain losses they incur on U.S. properties resulting from nuclear, biological, chemical and radiological (“NBCR”) perils, TRIPRA does not require insurers to offer coverage for these perils and, to date, insurers are not willing to provide this coverage, even with government reimbursement. Any damage related to war and to NBCR incidents, therefore, is excluded under policies covering our U.S. properties. Moreover, many of our foreign propertiesproperties are not covered against NBCR perils. We obtain a certain amount of property insurance coverage on our U.S. properties for NBCR perils through our wholly-owned subsidiary that acts as our direct insurer against such perils to the extent of reimbursement under TRIPRA. We ultimately are responsible for any loss borne by our insurance subsidiary.

As a result of the above, there remains uncertainty regarding the adequacy and cost of terrorism coverage that will be available to protect our interests in the event of terrorist attacks that impact our properties.    

Some potential losses are not covered by insurance.

We, or our hotel managers, carry comprehensive insurance coverage for general liability, property, business interruption and other risks with respect to all of our hotels and other properties. These policies offer coverage features and insured limits that we believe are customary for similar types of properties. Generally, our “all-risk” property policies provide coverage that is available on a per-occurrence basis and that, for each occurrence, has an overall limit, as well as various sub-limits, on the amount of insurance proceeds we can receive. Sub-limits exist for certain types of claims, such as service interruption, debris removal, expediting costs, landscaping replacement and natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods and hurricanes, and may be subject to annual aggregate coverage limits. The dollar amounts of these sub-limits are significantly lower than the dollar amounts of the overall coverage limit. In this regard, hotels in certain of our markets, including California, Florida and New Zealand,Seattle, have in the past been and continue to be particularly susceptible to damage from natural disasters. Recovery under the applicable policies also is subject to substantial deductibles and complex calculations of lost business income. There is no assurance that this insurance, where maintained, will fully fund the re-building or restoration of a hotel that is impacted by an earthquake, hurricane, or other natural disaster, or the income lost as a result of the damage. Our property policies also provide that all of the claims from each of our properties resulting from a particular insurable event must be combined together for purposes of evaluating whether the aggregate limits and sub-limits contained in our policies have been exceeded and, in the case where the manager of one of our hotels provides this coverage, any such claims will be combined with the claims of other owners participating in the manager’s program for the same purpose. Therefore, if an insurable event occurs that affects more than one of our hotels, or, in the case of hotels where coverage is provided by the manager, affects hotels owned by others, the claims from each affected hotel will be added together to determine whether the aggregate limit or


sub-limits, depending on the type of claim, have been reached. Each affected hotel only may receive a proportional share of the amount of insurance proceeds provided for under the policy if the total value of the loss exceeds the aggregate limits available. We may incur losses in excess of insured limits and, as a result, we may be even less likely to receive complete coverage for risks that affect multiple properties, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, or certain types of terrorism.

In addition, there are other risks, such as certain environmental hazards, that may be deemed to fall completely outside the general coverage limits of our policies or may be uninsurable or too expensive to justify coverage. We also may encounter challenges with an insurance provider regarding whether it will pay a particular claim that we believe to be covered under our policy. Should a loss in excess of insured limits or an uninsured loss occur, or should we be unsuccessful in obtaining coverage from an insurance carrier, we could lose all or a part of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the hotel. In that event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property.

22Cyber threats and the risk of data breaches or disruptions of our managers’ or our own information technology systems could materially adversely affect our business.


Our third party hotel managers are dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the internet, to access, process, transmit and store proprietary and customer information. These complex networks include reservation systems, vacation exchange systems, hotel management systems, customer databases, call centers, administrative systems, and third party vendor systems. These systems require the collection and retention of large volumes of personally identifiable information of hotel guests, including credit card numbers. Our hotel managers may store and process such proprietary and customer information both on systems located at the hotels we own and other hotels operated by our third party managers, their corporate locations and at third-party owned facilities, including, for example, in a third-party hosted cloud environment. These information networks and systems can be vulnerable to threats such as system, network or internet failures; computer hacking or business disruption; cyber-terrorism; viruses, worms or other malicious software programs; and employee error, negligence or fraud. These threats can be introduced in any number of ways, including through third parties accessing our hotel managers’ information networks and systems. The risks from these cyber threats are significant. We rely on the security systems of our managers to protect proprietary and customer information from these threats. Any compromise of our managers’ networks could result in a disruption to operations, such as disruptions in fulfilling guest reservations, delayed bookings or sales, or lost guest reservations. Any of these events could, in turn, result in disruption of the operations of the hotels we own that are managed by them, in increased costs and in potential litigation and liability. All of our major hotel management companies and a majority of our third party operators maintain insurance against cyber threats. However, these policies provide varying limits and may be subject to sub limits for certain types of claims, and it is not expected that these policies will provide a total recovery of all potential losses. In addition, public disclosure, or loss of customer or proprietary information, could result in damage to the manager’s reputation and a loss of confidence among hotel guests and result in reputational harm for the hotels owned by us and managed by them, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  

In addition to the information technologies and systems of our managers used to operate our hotels, we have our own corporate technologies and systems that are used to access, store, transmit, and manage or support a variety of business processes. There can be no assurance that the security measures we have taken to protect the contents of these systems will prevent failures, inadequacies or interruptions in system services or that system security will not be breached through physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, and attacks by hackers. Disruptions in service, system shutdowns and security breaches in the information technologies and systems we use, including unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, could have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial reporting and compliance, and subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties which could be significant and we do not currently insure against these losses.

Litigation judgments or settlements could have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition.

We have accrued a potential litigation loss of approximately $68 million in connection with a lawsuit in the 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas involving the sale of land encumbered by a ground lease for the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter. See Part I Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” for more information on the verdict and the status of the appeal.

We also are involved in various other legal proceedings in the normalordinary course of business and are vigorously defending these claims; however, no assurances can be given as to the outcome of any pending legal proceedings. We believe, based on currently available information, that the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, but might be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending,depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.

We also could become the subject of future claims by the operators of our hotels, individuals or companies who use our hotels, our investors, our joint venture partners or regulating entities and these claims could have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition and performance.

We may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities related to hotels or businesses we acquire.

Assets and entities that we have acquired, or may in the future acquire, may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In general, the representations and warranties provided under the transaction agreements may not survive long enough for us to become aware of such liabilities and seek recourse against our sellers. While usually we require the sellers to indemnify us with respect to breaches of representations and warranties that survive, such indemnification often is limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible or an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. The total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with acquired hotels and entities may exceed our expectations, plus we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may affect adversely our revenues, expenses, operating results and financial condition. Finally, indemnification agreements between us and the sellers typically provide that the sellers will retain certain specified liabilities relating to the assets and entities acquired by us. While the sellers generally are contractually obligated to pay all losses and other expenses relating to such retained liabilities without regard to survival limitations, materiality thresholds, deductibles or caps on losses, there can be no guarantee that such arrangements will not require us to incur losses or other expenses in addition to those incurred by the sellers.

We depend on our key personnel.

Our continued success depends on the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and other key personnel. None of our key personnel have employment agreements and we do not maintain key person life insurance for any of our executive officers. We cannot assure youThese


individuals are important to our business and strategy and to the extent that these key personnel will remain employed by us. While we believe that weany of them departs and is not replaced with a qualified substitute, such person’s departure could find replacements for these key personnel, the loss of their services could have a significant adverse effect onharm our operations and financial performance.condition.

Exchange rate fluctuations could affect adversely our financial results.

As a result of the expansion of our international operations, currencyCurrency exchange rate fluctuations could affect our results of operations and financial position. We expect to generate an increasing portion of our revenue and expenses in such foreign currencies as the Euro, the Canadian dollar, the Mexican peso, the Australian dollar, the New Zealand dollar, the British pound sterling, the Polish zloty, Swedish krona, the Brazilian real and the Chilean peso.Indian rupee. Although we may enter into foreign exchange agreements with financial institutions and/or obtain local currency mortgage debt in order to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the value of these and other foreign currencies, these transactions, if entered into, will not eliminate entirely that risk entirely.risk. To the extent that we are unable to match revenue received in foreign currencies with expenses paid in thethat same currency, exchange rate fluctuations could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, because our consolidated financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, if we generate revenues or earnings in other currencies, the conversion of such amounts to U.S. dollars can result in an increase or decrease in the amount of our revenues or earnings.

Similarly, changes in the exchange rates of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar can result in increases or decreases in demand at our U.S. properties from international travelers coming to the United States. Because of the concentration of our hotels in major U.S. cities, we may have more exposure to fluctuations in international travel to the United States than other lodging companies without investments located as heavily in these markets.

Applicable REIT laws may restrict certain business activities.

As a REIT, Host Inc. is subject to various restrictions on the types of income it can earn, assets it can own and activities in which it can engage. Business activities that could be restricted by applicable REIT laws include, but are not limited to, activities such as developing alternative uses of real estate, including the development and/or sale of timeshare or condominium units. Due to these restrictions, we anticipate that we will conduct certain business activities, including those mentioned above, in one or more of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. Our taxable REIT subsidiaries are taxable as regular C corporations and are subject to federal, state, local, and, if applicable, foreign taxation on their taxable income.

23


We may be unable to sell properties because real estate investments are inherently illiquid.

Real estate properties generally cannot be sold quickly and, accordingly, we may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions. The inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our investments could affect adversely our financial condition and the ability to service our debt. In addition, under the federal income tax laws applicable to REITs, we may be limited in our ability to recognize the full economic benefit from a sale of our assets.

Our ground lease payments may increase faster than the revenues we receive from the hotels located on the leased ground.

As of December 31, 2013, 36 of our hotels are subject to third-party ground leases (encumbering all or a portion of the hotel). These ground leases generally require periodic increases in ground rent payments, which often are based on economic indicators such as the Consumer Price Index. Our ability to pay ground rent could be affected adversely to the extent that our hotel revenues do not increase at the same or a greater rate than the increases in rental payments under the ground leases. In addition, if we were to sell a hotel encumbered by a ground lease, the buyer would be required to assume the ground lease, which may result in a lower sales price.

Environmental problems are possible and can be costly.

We believe that ourOur properties comply in all material respects with applicableare subject to requirements and potential liabilities under various foreign and U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws.laws, ordinances and regulations. Unidentified environmental liabilities could arise however, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and performance. Additionally, even after we have sold a property, we may be liable for environmental liabilitiesliabilities that occurred during our ownership. Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and remediate hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at the property. The owner or operator may be required to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage, and for investigation and remediation costs incurred by the parties in connection with the contamination. These laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from that site. Environmental laws also govern the presence, maintenance and removal of toxic or hazardous substances. These laws require that owners or operators of buildings properly manage and maintain these substances and notify and train those who may come into contact with them and undertake special precautions. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to toxic or hazardous materials.

We face possible risks associated with natural disasters and the physical effects of climate change.

We are subject to the risks associated with natural disasters and the physical effects of climate change, which can include more frequent or severe storms, droughts, hurricanes and flooding, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations and business. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns, our coastal markets also could experience increases in storm intensity and rising sea-levels causing damage to our properties. As a result, we could become subject to significant losses and/or repair costs that may or may not be fully covered by insurance. Other markets may experience prolonged variations in temperature or precipitation that may limit access to the water needed to operate our hotels or significantly increase energy costs, which may subject those properties to additional regulatory burdens, such as limitations on water usage or stricter energy efficiency standards.  Climate change also may affect our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable in areas most vulnerable to such events, increasing operating costs at our properties, such as the cost of water or


energy, and requiring us to expend funds as we seek to repair and protect our properties against such risks. There can be no assurance that climate change will not have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations or business.

Compliance with other government regulations can be costly.

Our hotels are subject to various other forms of regulation, including Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), building codes and regulations pertaining to fire and life safety. Under the ADA, all public accommodations are required to meet certain federal rules related to access and use by disabled persons. These laws and regulations may be changed from time-to-time, or new regulations adopted, resulting in additional costs of compliance, including potential litigation. For example, the ADA was revised substantially in September 2010 and our facilities were required to comply with the new regulations by March 15, 2012. A determination that we are not in compliance with the ADA or other laws and regulations could result in a court order to bring the hotel into compliance, imposition of finescivil penalties in cases brought by the Justice Department, or an award of attorneys’ fees to private litigants. Compliance with the ADA and other laws and regulations could require substantial capital expenditures. Any increased costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In addition, the operations of our international properties are subject to a variety of United States and international laws and regulations, including the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). We have policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws, but we cannot assure you that we will continue to be found to be operating in compliance with, or be able to detect violations of, any such laws or regulations. In addition, we cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international properties might be subject and the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.

24


Risks of Ownership of Host Inc.’s Common Stock

There are limitations on the acquisition of Host Inc. common stock and changes in control.

Host Inc.’s charter and bylaws,by-laws, the partnership agreement of Host L.P., and the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) contain a number of provisions, the exercise or existence of which could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that mightmight involve a premium price for Host Inc.’s stockholders or Host L.P.’s unitholders, or otherwise be in their best interests, including the following:

Restrictions on transfer and ownership of Host Inc.’s stock. To maintain Host Inc.’s qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, not more than 50% in value of Host Inc.’s outstanding shares of capital stock may be owned in the last half of the taxable year, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals, which, as defined in the Code, may include certain entities. In addition, if Host Inc., or one or more owners of 10% or more of Host Inc., actually or constructively owns 10% or more of a tenant of Host Inc. or a tenant of any partnership in which Host Inc. is a partner, the rent received by Host Inc. either directly or through any such partnership from such tenant generally will not be qualifying income for purposes of the REIT income qualification tests of the Code, and, therefore, could jeopardize Host Inc.’s qualification as a REIT, unless the tenant qualifies as a TRS and certain other requirements are met.

Accordingly, Host Inc.’s charter prohibits ownership, directly or by attribution, by any person or persons acting as a group, of more than 9.8% in value or number, whichever is more restrictive, of shares of Host Inc.’s outstanding common stock, preferred stock or any other class or series of stock, each considered as a separate class or series for this purpose. Together, these limitations are referred to as the “ownership limit.”

Stock acquired or held in violation of the ownership limit will be transferred automatically to a trust for the benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary, and the intended acquirer of the stock in violation of the ownership limit will not be entitled to any distributions thereon, to vote those shares of stock or to receive any proceeds from the subsequent sale of the stock in excess of the lesser of the price paid for the stock or the amount realized from the sale. A transfer of shares of Host Inc.’s stock to a person who, as a result of the transfer, violates the ownership limit may be void under certain circumstances, and, in any event, would deny that person any of the economic benefits of owning shares of Host Inc.’s stock in excess of the ownership limit. These restrictions will not apply if Host Inc.’s Board of Directors determines that it is no longer is in Host Inc.’s best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance with the restrictions on transfer and ownership is no longer is required for Host Inc. to qualify as a REIT.

Removal of members of the Board of Directors. Host Inc.’s charter provides that, except for any directors who may be elected by holders of a class or series of shares of capital stock other than common stock, directors may be removed only for cause and by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors. Vacancies on Host Inc.’s Board of Directors may be filled, at any regular meeting or at any special meeting called for that purpose, by the affirmative vote of the remaining directors, except that a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors may be filled by a majority vote of the entire Board of Directors. Any vacancy resulting from the removal of a director by the stockholders may be filled by the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.

Removal of members of the Board of Directors. Host Inc.’s charter provides that, except for any directors who may be elected by holders of a class or series of shares of capital stock other than common stock, directors may be removed only for cause and by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors. Vacancies on Host Inc.’s Board of Directors may be filled, at any regular meeting or at any special meeting called for that purpose, by the affirmative vote of the remaining directors, except that a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors may be filled by a majority vote of the entire Board of Directors. Any vacancy resulting from the removal of a director by the stockholders may be filled by the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.

Preferred shares; classification or reclassification of unissued shares of capital stock without stockholder approval. Host Inc.’s charter provides that the total number of shares of stock of all classes that Host Inc. has authority to issue is 1,100,000,000, consisting of 1,050,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has the authority, without a vote of stockholders, to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock, and to establish the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers,


restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each class or series. Because Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has this power, it may give the holders of any class or series of stock terms, preferences, powers and rights, including voting rights, senior to the rights of holders of existing stock.

Certain provisions of Maryland law may limit the ability of a third-party to acquire control of Host Inc. Certain provisions of the MGCL may have the effect of inhibiting a third-party from acquiring Host Inc., including:

Certain provisions of Maryland law may limit the ability of a third-party to acquire control of Host Inc. Certain provisions of the MGCL may have the effect of inhibiting a third-party from acquiring Host Inc., including:

o

“business combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between a corporation and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s then outstanding shares of voting stock or an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation) or an affiliate of any interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter imposes two super-majority stockholder voting requirements on these combinations:combinations; and

o

“control share” provisions that provide that holders of “control shares” of a corporation (defined as voting shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned or controlled by the acquirer, would entitle the acquirer

25


to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of issued and outstanding “control shares”) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by the stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.

Host Inc. is subject to the Maryland business combination statute. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting us from the control share provisions of the MGCL. There can be no assurance that this bylaw provision exempting us from the control share provisions will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.

Additionally, Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL permits our Board of Directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what currently is provided in our charter or bylaws, to implement certain takeover defenses, such as a classified board, some of which we do not have.

Merger, consolidation, share exchange and transfer of Host Inc.’s assets. Under Maryland law and Host Inc.’s charter, subject to the terms of any outstanding class or series of capital stock, we can merge with or into another entity, convert, consolidate with one or more other entities, participate in a share exchange or transfer Host Inc.’s assets within the meaning of the MGCL if approved (1) by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors in the manner provided in the MGCL, and (2) by Host Inc.’s stockholders holding two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, except that any merger of Host Inc. with or into a trust organized for the purpose of changing Host Inc.’s form of organization from a corporation to a trust requires only the approval of Host Inc.’s stockholders holding a majority of all votes entitled to be cast on the merger. Under the MGCL, specified mergers may be approved without a vote of stockholders and a share exchange only is required to be approved by the board of directors of a Maryland corporation if the corporation is the successor entity. Host Inc.’s voluntary dissolution also would require approval of stockholders holding two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.

Merger, consolidation, share exchange

Certain charter amendments. Host Inc.’s charter contains provisions relating to restrictions on transfer and ownership of Host Inc.’s stock, fixing the size of the Board of Directors within the range set forth in the charter, removal of directors, the filling of vacancies, exculpation and indemnification of directors, calling special stockholder meetings and others, all of which may be amended only by a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors and transfer of Host Inc.’s assets. Under Maryland law and Host Inc.’s charter, subject to the terms of any outstanding class or series of capital stock, we can merge with or into another entity, consolidate with one or more other entities, participate in a share exchange or transfer Host Inc.’s assets within the meaning of the MGCL if approved (1) by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors in the manner provided in the MGCL, and (2) by Host Inc.’s stockholders holding two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, except that any merger of Host Inc. with or into a trust organized for the purpose of changing Host Inc.’s form of organization from a corporation to a trust requires only the approval of Host Inc.’s stockholders holding a majority of all votes entitled to be cast on the merger. Under the MGCL, specified mergers may be approved without a vote of stockholders and a share exchange only is required to be approved by the board of directors of a Maryland corporation if the corporation is the successor entity. Host Inc.’s voluntary dissolution also would require approval of stockholders holding two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Other charter amendments generally require approval of the Board and the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. These provisions may make it more difficult to amend Host Inc.’s charter to alter the provisions described herein that could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control or the acquisition of Host Inc. common stock, without the approval of the Board of Directors.

Certain charter and bylaw amendments. Host Inc.’s charter contains provisions relating to restrictions on transfer and ownership of Host Inc.’s stock, fixing the size of the Board of Directors within the range set forth in the charter, removal of directors, the filling of vacancies, exculpation and indemnification of directors, calling special stockholder meetings and others, all of which may be amended only by a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by Host Inc.’s stockholders holding two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Other charter amendments generally require approval of the Board and the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. As permitted under the MGCL, Host Inc.’s charter and bylaws provide that the Board of Directors has the exclusive right to amend Host Inc.’s bylaws. These provisions may make it more difficult to amend Host Inc.’s charter and bylaws to alter the provisions described herein that could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control or the acquisition of Host Inc. common stock, without the approval of the Board of Directors.

Shares of Host Inc.’s common stock that are or become available for sale could affect the share price of Host Inc.’s common stock.

We have in the past and may in the future issue additional shares of common stock to raise the capital necessary to finance hotel acquisitions, fund capital expenditures, refinance debt or for other corporate purposes. Sales of a substantial number of shares of Host Inc.’s common stock, or the perception that sales could occur, could affect adversely prevailing market prices for Host Inc.’s common stock.stock. In addition, holders of OP units who redeem their units and receive, at Host Inc.’s election, shares of Host Inc. common stock will be able to sell those shares freely. As of December 31, 2013,2016, there are approximately 9.58.6 million Host LP OP units outstanding owned by third parties that are redeemable, which represents approximately 1.3%1% of all outstanding units. Further, a substantial number of shares of Host Inc.’s common stock have been and will be issued or reserved for issuance from time to time under our employee benefit plans. WeAs of December 31, 2016, we  maintain two stock-based compensation plans: (i) the comprehensive stock plan, whereby we may award to participating employees and directors restricted shares of common stock, options to purchase common stock and deferred shares of common stock, and (ii) an employee stock purchase plan. At December 31, 2013,2016, there were approximately 1814 million shares of Host Inc.’s common stock reserved and available for issuance under the comprehensive stock plan


and employee stock purchase plan and 0.71.3 million outstanding options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $15.41$17.78 per share.

Also as of December 31, 2013, Host L.P. had outstanding $400 million principal amount of exchangeable senior debentures that currently are exchangeable for cash, shares of Host Inc.’s common stock or any combination thereof. Assuming the holders elected to exchange and we elected to settle in shares of Host Inc. common stock, the debentures would be exchangeable for approximately 29.9 million shares based on the current exchange price. While these debentures currently are exchangeable through March 31, 2014 based on past trading prices of Host Inc. common stock, whether they remain exchangeable after March 31, 2014 will depend on then current trading prices of Host Inc. common stock.

Our earnings and cash distributions will affect the market price of shares of Host Inc.’s common stock.

We believe that the market value of a REIT’s equity securities is based primarily upon the market’s perception of the REIT’s growth potential and its current and potential future cash distributions, whether from operations, sales, acquisitions, development or refinancings, and secondarily is based upon the value of the underlying assets. For that reason, shares of Host Inc.’s common stock

26


may trade at prices that are higher or lower than the net asset value per share. To the extent that we retain operating cash flow for investment purposes, working capital reserves or other purposes, rather than distributing the cash flow to stockholders, these retained funds, while increasing the value of our underlying assets, may impact negatively the market price of Host Inc.’s common stock. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions likely would affect adversely the market price of Host Inc.’s common stock.

Market interest rates may affect the price of shares of Host Inc.’s common stock.

We believe that one Additionally, as a result of the factors that investors consider important2016 U.S. elections and ongoing activity in deciding whetherthe U.S. Congress relating to buy or sell sharestax reform proposals, there is a heightened possibility of a REIT issignificant changes to U.S. federal tax laws, including the dividend rate on the shares, considered as a percentagepossibility of the price of the shares, relative to market interest rates. If market interestlower corporate tax rates, increase, prospective purchasers of REIT shareswhich may expect a higher dividend rate. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of Host Inc.’s common stock to decrease.make investments in REITs relatively less attractive than they currently are.

Federal Income Tax Risks

To qualify as a REIT, each of Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs are required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gain, regardless of available cash or outstanding obligations.

To continue to qualify as a REIT, Host Inc. is required to distribute to its stockholders with respect to each year at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gain. To the extent that Host Inc. satisfies this distribution requirement, but distributes less than 100% of its taxable income and net capital gain for the taxable year, it will be subject to federal and state corporate income tax on its undistributed taxable income and net capital gain. In addition, Host Inc. will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions made by Host Inc. with respect to the calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of its ordinary income, (2) 95% of its net capital gain, and (3) any undistributed taxable income from prior years, less excess distributions from prior years. Host Inc. intends to make distributions, subject to the availability of cash and in compliance with any debt covenants, to its stockholders in order to comply with the distribution requirement and to avoid the imposition of a significant nondeductible 4% excise tax and will rely for this purpose on distributions from Host L.P. and its subsidiaries. There are differences in timing between Host Inc.’s recognition of taxable income and its receipt of cash available for distribution due to, among other things, the seasonality of the lodging industry and the fact that some taxable income will be “phantom” taxable income, which is taxable income that is not matched with cash flow. Due to transactions entered into in years prior to Host Inc.’s conversion to a REIT, Host Inc. could recognize substantial amounts of “phantom” taxable income in the future. It is possible that any differences between the recognition of taxable income and the receipt of the related cash could require us to borrow funds or for Host Inc. to issue additional equity in order to enable Host Inc. to meet its distribution requirements and, therefore, to maintain its REIT status and to avoid the nondeductible 4% excise tax. In addition, because the REIT distribution requirements prevent Host Inc. from retaining earnings, generally we will be required to refinance debt at its maturity with additional debt or equity. It is possible that any of these sources of funds, if available at all, would not be sufficient to meet Host Inc.’s distribution and tax obligations.

Host L.P. owns 100% of the outstanding common stock and a portion of the outstanding preferred stock of two entities that have elected to be treated as REITs. Each of these subsidiary REITs are subject to the same requirements that Host Inc. must satisfy in order to qualify as a REIT, including the distribution requirements described above.

Adverse tax consequences would occur if Host Inc. or any of its subsidiary REITs failREIT fails to qualify as a REIT.

We believe that Host Inc. has been organized and has operated in such a manner so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code, commencing with its taxable year beginning January 1, 1999, and Host Inc. currently intends to continue to operate as a REIT during future years. In addition, Host Inc. owns, through Host L.P., two entitiesone entity that havehas elected to be treated as REITs.a REIT. As the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT are extremely complex and interpretations of the federal income tax laws governing qualification and taxation as a REIT are limited, no assurance can be provided that Host Inc. currently qualifies as a REIT or will continue to qualify as a REIT or that each of Host Inc.’s subsidiary REITs qualifyREIT qualifies as a REIT or will continue to qualify as a REIT. If any of theour subsidiary REITsREIT were to fail to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that Host Inc. would fail to qualify as a REIT unless it (or the subsidiary REIT) could avail itself of certain relief provisions. New legislation, treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could change significantly the tax laws with respect to an entity’s qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of its REIT qualification. If Host Inc. or any of its subsidiary REITsREIT were to fail to qualify as a REIT, and any available relief provisions did not apply, the non-qualifying REIT would not be allowed to take a deduction for distributions to its stockholders in computing its taxable income, and it would be subject to federal and state corporate income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Moreover, unless entitled to statutory relief, the non-qualifying REIT wouldcould not qualify as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which REIT qualification was lost.

To qualify as a REIT, Host Inc. is required to satisfy several asset and gross income tests. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which assets are not susceptible to a precise determination of fair market value, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the REIT gross income and quarterly asset test requirements also depends upon our ability to successfully manage the composition of our gross income and assets on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend that our hotel leases, interests in subsidiaries, or interests in the securities of other issuers will not cause a violation of the REIT gross income and asset test requirements.

Any determination that Host Inc. or one of its subsidiary REITsREIT does not qualify as a REIT will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could reduce materially the value of Host Inc.’s common stock. The additional tax liability of Host

27


Inc. or the subsidiary REIT for the year, or years, in which the relevant entity diddoes not qualify as a REIT would reduce its net earningscash flow available for investment, debt service or distributions to stockholders. Furthermore, the non-qualifying entity not qualifying as a REIT no longer would be required to make distributions to its stockholders as a condition to REIT qualification and all of itsany distributions made to stockholders would be taxable as ordinary C corporation dividends to the extent of its current and accumulated earnings and profits. This means that, if Host Inc. were to fail to qualify as a REIT, Host Inc.’s stockholders currently taxed as individuals would be taxed on those dividends at capital gain tax rates and Host Inc.’s corporate stockholders generally would be entitled to the dividends received deduction with respect to such dividends, subject in each case to applicable limitations under the Code. Host Inc.’s failure to qualify as a REIT also would cause an event of default under Host L.P.’s credit facility, which default could lead to an acceleration of the amounts due thereunder, which, in turn, would constitute an event of default under Host L.P.’s outstanding debt securities.

If our leaseshotel managers do not qualify as “eligible independent contractors,” or if our hotels are not respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes, each of“qualified lodging facilities,” Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs wouldwill fail to qualify as a REIT.

ToEach hotel with respect to which our TRS pays rent must be a “qualified lodging facility.” A “qualified lodging facility” is a hotel, motel, or other establishment more than one-half of the dwelling units in which are used on a transient basis, including


customary amenities and facilities, provided that no wagering activities are conducted at or in connection with such facility by any person who is engaged in the business of accepting wagers and who legally is authorized to engage in such business at or in connection with such facility. We believe that all of the hotels leased to our TRS are qualified lodging facilities. However, the REIT provisions of the Code provide only limited guidance for making determinations of whether a hotel is considered a qualified lodging facility, and there can be no assurance that our hotels will be so considered in all cases.

If our hotel managers do not qualify as “eligible independent contractors”, Host Inc. and our subsidiary REIT likely will fail to qualify as a REIT Host Inc.for federal income tax purposes. Each of the hotel management companies that enters into a management contract with our TRS must satisfy two gross income tests, pursuant to which specified percentages of its gross income must be passive income, suchqualify as rent. Foran “eligible independent contractor” under the REIT rules in order for the rent paid pursuant to us by our TRS to be qualifying gross income for the REIT gross income test requirements. Among other requirements, in order to qualify as an eligible independent contractor, a hotel manager cannot own more than 35% of our outstanding shares (by value) and no person or group of persons can own more than 35% of our outstanding shares and the ownership interests of the hotel leasesmanager, taking into account only owners of more than 5% of our shares and, with respect to ownership interests in such hotel managers that are publicly traded, only owners of more than 5% of such ownership interests. Complex ownership attribution rules apply for purposes of these 35% ownership thresholds. Although we monitor ownership of our shares by our hotel managers and their owners, and certain provisions of our charter are designed to prevent ownership of our shares in violation of these rules, there can be no assurance that these ownership limits will not be exceeded.

The size of our TRS is limited and our transactions with our TRS which rentalwill cause us to be subject to a 100% excise tax on certain income currently constitutes substantially all of Host Inc.’s and each of our subsidiary REITs’ gross income,or deductions if such transactions are not conducted on arm’s-length terms.

A REIT may own up to qualify for purposes100% of the gross income tests, our leases must be respected as true leasesequity interests of an entity that is a corporation for federal income tax purposes if the entity is a TRS. A TRS may hold assets and earn gross income that would not be considered as qualifying assets or as qualifying gross income if held or earned directly by a REIT, including gross operating income from hotel operations. Both the REIT and its corporate subsidiary must notjointly elect to treat such corporate subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of its stock automatically will be treated as service contracts, joint venturesa TRS. Overall, no more than 25% (20% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or some other typesecurities of arrangement.one or more TRS. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT in order to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate income taxation.

Our TRS will pay federal income tax and applicable state and local income tax and, if applicable, foreign income tax on its taxable income. Its after-tax net income will be available for distribution to us, but it is not required to be so distributed. We believe that the leasesaggregate value of the stock and securities of our TRS has been and will continue to be respected as true leasesless than 25% (20% for federal income tax purposes.years beginning after December 31, 2017) of the value of our total assets (including our TRS stock and securities). Furthermore, we monitor the value of our investments in our TRS for the purpose of ensuring compliance with TRS ownership limitations. There can be no assurance, however, that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)we will agree with this characterization. If the leases were not respected as true leases for federal income tax purposes, neither Host Inc. nor either of our subsidiary REITs would be able to satisfy either ofcomply with the two gross25% (20% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017) value limitation discussed above.

Rent paid to us by our TRS may not be based on net income tests applicable to REITs and each likely would lose its REIT status.

If our affiliated lessees failor profits in order for such rents to qualify as taxable REIT subsidiaries, each of Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs would fail to qualify as a REIT.

Rent paid by a lessee“rent from real property.” We receive “percentage rent” from our TRS that is a “related party tenant” of Host Inc. will not be qualifying income for purposescalculated based on the gross revenues of the two grosshotels subject to leases - not on net income tests applicable to REITs. We lease substantially all of our hotelsor profits. If the IRS determines that the rent paid pursuant to our subsidiary (or its affiliates)leases with our TRS are excessive, the deductibility thereof by the TRS may be challenged, and we could be subject to a 100% excise tax on “re-determined rent” or “re-determined deductions” to the extent that is taxable as a regular C corporation and thatsuch rent exceeds an arm’s-length amount. Recently enacted legislation has electedexpanded the items subject to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary with respect to Host Inc. and to each subsidiary REIT. So long as any affiliated lessee qualifies as a taxable REIT subsidiary, it will not be treated as a “related party tenant.”this 100% excise tax for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2016. We believe that our affiliated lessees have qualifiedrent and will continue to qualify,other transactions between our REITs and that the taxable REIT subsidiaries of each of our subsidiary REITs have qualifiedtheir TRS are based on arm’s-length amounts and will continue to qualify, to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes. Therereflect normal business practices, but there can be no assurance however, that the IRS will not challenge the status of a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in disqualifying any ofagree with our affiliated lessees (including the taxable REIT subsidiaries of our subsidiary REITs) from treatment as a taxable REIT subsidiary, it is possible that Host Inc. or a subsidiary REIT would fail to meet the asset tests applicable to REITs and substantially all of its income would fail to qualify for the gross income tests. If Host Inc. or a subsidiary REIT failed to meet either the asset tests or the gross income tests, each likely would lose its REIT status.belief.

Despite the REIT status of each of Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs,REIT, we remain subject to various taxes.

One of the subsidiary REITs of Host Inc. will be required to pay federal income tax at the highest regular corporate rate on “built-in gain” recognized as a result of the sale of one or more of its hotels prior to the expiration of the applicable 10-year holding period, including certain hotels acquired from Starwood and its affiliates in 2006. The total amount of gain on which the subsidiary REIT would be subject to corporate income tax if all of its built-in gain assets were sold in a taxable transaction prior to the expiration of the applicable 10-year holding period would be material to it. Recently enacted legislation, however, has reduced the 10-year period to five years in the case of dispositions of assets in 2012 or 2013.  In addition, we expect that we could recognize other substantial deferred tax liabilities in the future without any corresponding receipt of cash.

Notwithstanding Host Inc.’s status as a REIT, Host Inc. and our subsidiaries (including our subsidiary REITs)REIT) are subject to federal, state, local and foreign taxes on their net income, gross receipts, and property, in certain cases. For example, Host Inc. and our subsidiary REITs will pay tax on certain types of income that are not distributed and will be subject to a 100% excise tax on transactions with a taxable REIT subsidiary that are not conducted on an arm’s length basis. Moreover, the taxable REIT subsidiaries of Host Inc. and our subsidiary REITs are taxable as regular C corporations and will pay federal, state and local income tax on their net income at the applicable corporate rates, and foreign taxes to the extent that they own assets or conduct operations in foreign jurisdictions.

Host L.P. is obligated under its partnership agreement to pay all such taxes (and any related interest and penalties) incurred by Host Inc.

28


If the IRS were to challenge successfully Host L.P.’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, Host Inc. would cease to qualify as a REIT and would suffer other adverse consequences.

We believe that Host L.P. qualifies to be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, it is not subject to federal income tax on its income. Instead, each of its partners, including Host Inc., is required to report and pay tax, if applicable, on such partner’s allocable share of its income. No assurance can be provided, however, that the IRS will not challenge Host L.P.’s status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in treating Host L.P. as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, Host Inc. would fail to meet the gross income tests and certain of the asset tests applicable to REITs and, accordingly, would cease to qualify as a REIT. If Host L.P. fails to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or Host Inc. fails to qualify as a REIT, either failure would cause an event of default under Host L.P.’s credit facility that, in turn, could constitute an event of default under Host L.P.’s outstanding debt securities. Also, the failure of Host L.P. to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes would cause it to become subject to federal, state and foreign corporate income tax, which tax would reduce significantly the amount of cash available for debt service and for distribution to its partners, including Host Inc.

As a REIT, each of Host Inc. and its subsidiary REITs is subject to limitations on its ownership of debt and equity securities.

Subject to certain exceptions, a REIT generally is prohibited from owning securities in any one issuer to the extent that (1) the value of such securities exceeds 5% of the value of the REIT’s total assets, (2) the securities owned by the REIT represent more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities, or (3) the REIT owns more than 10% of the value of the issuer’s outstanding securities. A REIT is permitted to own securities of a subsidiary in an amount that exceeds the 5% value test and the 10% vote or value test if the subsidiary elects to be a taxable REIT subsidiary. However, a REIT may not own securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries that represent in the aggregate more than 25% of the value of the REIT’s total assets. If Host Inc. or any of its subsidiary REITs were to violate these ownership limitations, each likely would lose its REIT status.

Each of Host Inc. or its subsidiary REITs may be required to pay a penalty tax upon the sale of a hotel.

The federal income tax provisions applicable to REITs provide that any gain realized by a REIT from the sale of property held as inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a “prohibited transaction” that is subject to a 100% excise tax. Under existing law, whether property, including hotels, is held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is a question of fact that depends upon all of the facts and circumstances with respect to the particular transaction. We intend to hold our hotels for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of acquiring and owning hotels and to make occasional sales of hotels consistent with our investment objectives. There can be no assurance, however, that the IRS might not contend that one or more of these sales are subject to the 100% excise tax.

Risks Relating to Redemption of OP Units

A holder who offers its OP units for redemption may have adverse tax consequences.

A holder whosewho elects to redeem their OP units are redeemed will be treated for federal and state income tax purposes as having sold the OP units. The sale of these units is a taxable event and the holder thereof will be treated as realizing an amount equal to the sum of (1) the


value of the common stock or cash the holder receives, and (2) the amount of Host L.P.’s nonrecourse liabilities allocated to the redeemed OP units. The gain or loss recognized by the holder of OP unitsunits is measured by the difference between the amount realized by the holder and the holder’s tax basis in the OP units redeemed (which tax basis includes the amount of Host L.P.’s nonrecourse liabilities allocated to the redeemed OP units). It is possible that the amount of gain and/or the tax liability related thereto that the holder recognizes and pays could exceed the value of the common stock or cash that the holder receives.

Differences between an investment in shares of Host Inc. common stock and Host L.P. OP units may affect redeemed holders of OP units.

If a holder ofelects to redeem their OP units, elects to have its units redeemed, we will determine whether the holder receives cash or shares of Host Inc.’s common stock in exchange for the OP units. Although an investment in shares of Host Inc.’s common stock is substantially similar to an investment in Host L.P. OP units, there are some differences.  These differences include form of organization, management structure, voting rights, liquidity and federal and state incomeincome taxation, some of which differences may be material to investors.

29


Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

We have received no written comments regarding our periodic or current reports from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission that remain unresolved.

Item  2.

Properties

See Part 1 Item 1. “Business—Our Consolidated Hotel PortfolioPortfolio” above for a discussion of our hotels.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

On April 27, 2005, we initiated a lawsuit against Keystone-Texas Property Holding Corporation (“Keystone”) seeking a declaration that a provision of the ground lease for the property under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter was valid and claiming that Keystone had breached that lease provision. On October 18, 2006, Keystone filed an amended counterclaim and later, a third party claim, alleging that we had tortiously interfered with Keystone’s attempted sale of the property and that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property.

On February 8, 2010, we received an adverse jury verdict in the 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. The jury found that we tortiously interfered with the attempted sale by Keystone of the land under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter and awarded Keystone $34.3 million in damages, plus statutory interest. In addition, the jury found that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property and awarded Keystone $39 million in damages, plus statutory interest. Keystone only will be entitled to receive one of these damage awards. On February 12, 2010, the jury awarded Keystone $7.5 million in exemplary damages with respect to the second claim. The trial court, however, subsequently granted our motion to disregard the jury’s exemplary damages award. On June 3, 2010, the trial court issued its final judgment awarding Keystone: (i) $39 million in damages for slander of title or, alternatively, $34.3 million for tortious interference of contract; (ii) approximately $6.8 million in pre-judgment and post-judgment interest (as of December 31, 2013, interest was $17 million); (iii) approximately $3.5 million in attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs; and (iv) an additional $750,000 in attorneys’ fees for any appeal to the court of appeals and Texas Supreme Court.

On November 23, 2011, a three-judge panel of the San Antonio Court of Appeals issued its memorandum opinion denying our appeal of the trial court’s June 3, 2010 final judgment. In addition, the panel overturned the trial court’s decision to grant our motion to disregard the jury’s $7.5 million award of exemplary damages. On January 17, 2012, we filed motions seeking rehearing from the three-judge panel and a motion for rehearing by the entire seven-judge court of appeals. Those motions were denied on February 29, 2012.

On May 16, 2012, we filed a Petition for Review in the Texas Supreme Court and on August 17, 2012 the Court requested briefing on the merits. Briefing concluded in January 2013. On June 28, 2013, the Court issued an order denying the petition for review; however, on December 13, 2013, the Court granted our motion for rehearing on that order and heard oral argument on our appeal on February 4, 2014. No assurances can be given as to the outcome of this appeal. We have accrued a loss contingency of approximately $68 million related to this litigation. We have funded a court-ordered $25 million escrow reserve for this legal proceeding.

We also are involved in various other legal proceedings in the normalordinary course of business including, but not limited to, disputes involving hotel-level contracts, employment litigation, compliance with laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, tax disputes and other general matters. We are vigorously defending these claims; however, no assurances can be given as to the outcome of any pending legal proceedings. We believe, based on currently available information, that the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, but might be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.

We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.None.

 

 

30



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In the following table we set forth certain information regarding those persons currently serving as executive officers of Host Inc. as of February 1, 2014. 20, 2017. As a partnership, Host L.P. does not have executive officers.

 

Name and Title

 

Age

 

Business Experience Prior to Becoming an

Executive Officer of Host Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

Richard E. Marriott

Chairman of the Board

 

7578

 

Richard E. Marriott joined our company in 1965 and has served in various executive capacities. In 1979, Mr. Marriott was elected to the Board of Directors. In 1984, he was elected Executive Vice President and in 1986, he was elected Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors. In 1993, Mr. Marriott was elected Chairman of the Board.

 

 

 

 

 

W. Edward WalterJames F. Risoleo

President,

Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

5861

 

W. Edward WalterJames F. Risoleo joined our company in 1996 as Senior Vice President for Acquisitions and was later named TreasurerAcquisitions.  He has served in various capacities with the company including Executive Vice President and Chief OperatingInvestment Officer, before becoming our Chief Financial OfficerManaging Director of the company's European and West Coast investment activities and culminating in 2003his service as President and President, Chief Executive Officer and Directorbeginning in October 2007.January 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

Elizabeth A. Abdoo

Executive Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary

 

5558

 

Elizabeth A. Abdoo joined our company in June 2001 as Senior Vice President and General Counsel and became Executive Vice President in February 2003. She was elected Secretary in August 2001.

 

 

 

 

 

Minaz B. Abji

Executive Vice President,

Asset Management

 

6063

 

Minaz B. Abji joined our company in 2003 as Executive Vice President, Asset Management. Prior to joining us, Mr. Abji was President of Canadian Hotel Income Properties REIT, a Canadian REIT located in Vancouver, British Columbia where he worked since 1998. In January 2017, Mr. Abji announced his retirement as Executive Vice President effective April 30, 2017. Mr. Abji will continue as a senior advisor to the company through October 30, 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

Joanne G. Hamilton

Executive Vice President,

Human Resources

 

5659

 

Joanne G. Hamilton joined our company as Executive Vice President, Human Resources in January 2010. Prior to joining our company, she was the Chief Human Resource Officer for Beers & Cutler, an accounting and consulting firm based in Vienna, Virginia from 2007 to 2010. Prior to joining Beers & Cutler, Ms. Hamilton served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources for Spirent PLC, a global telecommunications company, from 2002 to 2007.

 

 

 

 

 

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

 

4952

 

Gregory J. Larson joined our company in 1993. In 1998, Mr. Larson joined the Treasury group as Vice President of Corporate Finance. He assumed leadership of the Investor Relations department in 2000, was promoted to Senior Vice President in 2002, and was elected Treasurer in 2005. In November 2007, Mr. Larson was selected to lead our corporate strategy business and promoted to Executive Vice President. In May 2013 he was named Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

 

 

James F. RisoleoNathan S. Tyrrell

Executive Vice President, &

Managing Director, EuropeInvestments

 

5844

 

James F. RisoleoNathan S. Tyrrell joined our companyfinance department in 1996 as Senior Vice President2005.  He became Treasurer in February 2010. In 2015, he was named Managing Director of investment activities for Acquisitions,the East Coast and in 2017 was electedpromoted to Executive Vice President, and Chief Investment Officer in 2000. In January 2012, he became managing directorInvestments, responsible for all of the Company’s European businesscompany’s investment activities.

 

 

 

 

 

Struan B. RobertsonMichael E. Lentz

Executive Vice PresidentManaging Director, Global

Chief Investment Officer    Development, Design & Construction

 

4853

 

Struan B. RobertsonMichael E. Lentz joined our company in January 2013. From 1994March 2016. Prior to 2012 he held various positions at Morgan Stanley, most recently asjoining us, Mr. Lentz was Senior Vice President of Global Co-HeadDevelopment for Las Vegas Sands Corp. from 2011 to 2016 and before that was the Vice President of its real estate and lodging investment banking business.Project Development with Walt Disney Imagineering for 20 years.

 

 

 

 

 

Brian G. Macnamara

Senior Vice President,

Corporate Controller

 

5457

 

Brian G. Macnamara joined our company in February 1996, was promoted to Vice President, Assistant Corporate Controller in February 2007, and was elected Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller in September 2007.

 

 

31



PART II

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host Inc.

Host Inc.’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol “HST.” The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of Host Inc.’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape and dividends declared per share:

 

Stock Price

 

Dividends
Declared
Per Share

 

Stock Price

 

Dividends
Declared
Per Share

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

High

 

 

 

Low

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st Quarter

$

17.25

 

 

$

14.71

 

 

$

0.06

 

$

24.14

 

 

$

20.04

 

 

$

0.20

 

2nd Quarter

 

17.06

 

 

 

14.11

 

 

 

0.07

 

 

20.73

 

 

 

19.40

 

 

 

0.20

 

3rd Quarter

 

16.30

 

 

 

14.06

 

 

 

0.08

 

 

21.29

 

 

 

15.39

 

 

 

0.20

 

4th Quarter

 

17.25

 

 

 

13.78

 

 

 

0.09

 

 

17.85

 

 

 

15.20

 

 

 

0.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Price

 

 

Dividends
Declared
Per Share

 

Stock Price

 

 

Dividends
Declared
Per Share

 

High

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st Quarter

$

17.73

 

 

$

16.14

 

 

$

0.10

 

$

16.97

 

 

$

12.82

 

 

$

0.20

 

2nd Quarter

 

18.77

 

 

 

16.02

 

 

 

0.11

 

 

16.95

 

 

 

14.58

 

 

 

0.20

 

3rd Quarter

 

18.70

 

 

 

16.41

 

 

 

0.12

 

 

18.37

 

 

 

15.57

 

 

 

0.20

 

4th Quarter

 

19.44

 

 

 

17.09

 

 

 

0.13

 

 

19.18

 

 

 

14.83

 

 

 

0.25

 

Under the terms of certain of our senior notes indenture and the credit facility, Host Inc.’s ability to pay dividends and make other payments is dependent on its ability to satisfy certain financial requirements. See Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition” and Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Financial Risks and Risks of Operation—Our ability to pay dividends and to make distributions may be limited or prohibited by the The terms of our indebtedness orindebtedness and preferred units.units place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and these restrictions reduce our operational flexibility and create default risks.

As of February 21, 2014,20, 2017, there were 24,75020,071 holders of record of Host Inc.’s common stock. However, because many of the shares of our common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we believe that there are considerably more beneficial holders of our common stock than record holders. As of February 21, 2014,20, 2017, there were 1,6961,364 holders of OP units (in addition to Host Inc.). OP units are redeemable for cash, or, at our election, for Host Inc.’s common stock.

Host Inc.’s ability to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code is facilitated by limiting the number of shares of its stock that a person may own. Its charter provides that, subject to limited exceptions, no person or persons acting as a group may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, more than 9.8% in value or in number, whichever is more restrictive, of shares of Host Inc.’s outstanding common stock, preferred stock or any other class of stock,stock, each considered as a separate class or series for this purpose. Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has the authority to increase the ownership limit from time to time, but does not have the authority to do so to the extent that, after giving effect to such increase, any five beneficial owners of capital stock beneficially could own in the aggregate more than 49.5% of the outstanding capital stock. See Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Risks of Ownership of Host Inc.’s Common Stock—There are limitations on the acquisition of Host Inc. common stock and changes in control.”

 

32



Stockholder Return Performance

The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on Host Inc.’s common stock against the cumulative total returns of the Standard & Poor’s Corporation Composite 500 Index and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust (“NAREIT”) Equity Index. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 in Host Inc.’s common stock and in each of the indexes, and also assumes the reinvestmentreinvestment of dividends.

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Stockholder Returns 2008201120132016

 

 

2008

 

 

2009

 

 

2010

 

 

2011

 

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

2011

 

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

$

100.00

 

 

$

157.88

 

 

$

242.26

 

 

$

202.29

 

 

$

218.77

 

 

$

278.51

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

108.13

 

 

$

137.68

 

 

$

174.20

 

 

$

117.59

 

 

$

152.12

 

NAREIT Equity Index

$

100.00

 

 

$

127.99

 

 

$

163.76

 

 

$

177.32

 

 

$

212.26

 

 

$

218.32

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

119.70

 

 

$

123.12

 

 

$

157.63

 

 

$

162.08

 

 

$

176.07

 

S&P 500 Index

$

100.00

 

 

$

126.46

 

 

$

145.51

 

 

$

148.59

 

 

$

172.37

 

 

$

228.19

 

$

100.00

 

 

$

116.00

 

 

$

153.56

 

 

$

174.60

 

 

$

177.01

 

 

$

198.18

 

This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing of Host Inc. or Host L.P. (or any of their respective subsidiaries) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

Fourth Quarter 20132016 Host Inc. SalesPurchases of UnregisteredEquity Securities

On December 6, 2013, Host Inc. issued 12,335 sharesThe purchases reflected below were made under a program to repurchase up to $500 million of common stock to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund in exchange for 12,076 OP units of Host L.P. held by the fund.  All shares were issued pursuant to the private placement exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.announced on October 29, 2015. The number of shares issued was basedprogram expired on the current conversion factor of 1.021494 shares per OP unit.    December 31, 2016.

Period

 

Total Number of

Host Inc. Common Shares Purchased

 

 

 

Average Price Paid

per Common Share

 

Total Number of Common Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs

 

 

Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Common Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

(in millions)

 

October 1, 2016 – October 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

117.3

 

November 1, 2016 – November 30, 2016

 

 

747,900

 

 

 

$15.82

 

 

747,900

 

 

 

105.5

 

December 1, 2016 – December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

747,900

 

 

 

$15.82

 

 

747,900

 

 

$

 

 


33



Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Units, Related Unitholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Host L.P.

There is no established public trading market for our OP units and transfers of OP units are restricted by the terms of Host L.P.’s partnership agreement. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, Host L.P.’s distributions declared per common OP unit:

 

Distributions Declared
Per Common Unit

 

Distributions Declared
Per Common Unit

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

1st Quarter

$

0.0613

 

 

$

0.1021

 

$

0.2043

 

 

$

0.2043

 

2nd Quarter

 

0.0715

 

 

 

0.1124

 

 

0.2043

 

 

 

0.2043

 

3rd Quarter

 

0.0817

 

 

 

0.1226

 

 

0.2043

 

 

 

0.2043

 

4th Quarter

 

0.0919

 

 

 

0.1328

 

 

0.2043

 

 

 

0.2554

 

The number of holders of record of Host L.P.’s common OP units on February 21, 201420, 2017 was 1,696 .1,364. The number of outstanding common OP units as of February 21, 201420, 2017 was 750,325,094732,232,279 of which 740,816,858723,695,943 were owned by Host Inc. Under the terms of certain of our senior notes indenture and the credit facility, Host L.P.’s ability to make distributions and other payments is dependent on its ability to satisfy certain financial requirements. In addition, under the terms of Host L.P.’s preferred OP units, we are not permitted to make distributions on our common OP units unless all cumulative distributions have been paid on our preferred OP units. See Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financial Condition” and Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Financial Risks and Risks of Operation—Our ability to pay dividends and to make distributions may be limited or prohibited by the The terms of our indebtedness orand preferred units”units place restrictions on us and our subsidiaries and these restrictions reduce our operational flexibility and create default risks.”

Fourth Quarter 20132016 Host L.P. Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Period

 

Total Number of

OP Units Purchased

 

 

Average Price

Paid Per Unit

 

Total Number of OP

Units Purchased as Part of

Publicly Announced

Plans or Programs

 

 

Maximum number (or Approximate Dollar ValueValue)

of Units that

May Yet Be Purchased

Under the Plans or Programs

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 1, 20132016 — October 31, 20132016

 

 

21,40587,267

*

 

1.021494 shares of Host Inc. Common Stock*Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

November 1, 20132016 — November 30, 20132016

 

 

61,185749,238

**

 

1.021494 shares of Host Inc. Common Stock*Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 1, 20132016 — December 31, 20132016

 

 

42,24149,000

*

 

1.021494 shares of Host Inc. Common Stock*Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

124,831885,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

Reflects common OP units redeemed by Host Inc.holders in exchange for shares of Host Inc.’s common stock.

**

Reflects (1) 732,162 common OP units repurchased to fund the repurchase by Host Inc. of 747,900 shares of common stock as part of its publicly announced share repurchase program, and (2) 17,076 common OP units redeemed by holders in exchange for shares of Host Inc.’s common stock.

 

34


 


Item 6.

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

The following table presents certain selected historical financial data which has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. for the five years ended December 31, 20132016 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

 

 

 

Calendar year

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

 

2009

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

5,166

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

$

4,714

 

 

$

4,154

 

 

$

3,882

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(137

)

 

 

(188

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (1)

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(70

)

Net income (loss)

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(132

)

 

 

(258

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

317

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(130

)

 

 

(252

)

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

 

 

317

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(138

)

 

 

(261

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.27

 

 

 

(.01

)

 

 

(.04

)

 

 

(.22

)

 

 

(.33

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

(.12

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.08

 

 

 

(.02

)

 

 

(.21

)

 

 

(.45

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.27

 

 

 

(.01

)

 

 

(.04

)

 

 

(.22

)

 

 

(.33

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

(.12

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

 

 

.42

 

 

 

.08

 

 

 

(.02

)

 

 

(.21

)

 

 

(.45

)

Dividends declared per common share

 

 

.46

 

 

 

.30

 

 

 

.14

 

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.25

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

12,814

 

 

$

12,994

 

 

$

13,090

 

 

$

12,411

 

 

$

12,555

 

Debt

 

 

4,759

 

 

 

5,411

 

 

 

5,753

 

 

 

5,477

 

 

 

5,837

 

Preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

Calendar year

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

5,350

 

 

 

5,321

 

 

$

5,134

 

 

$

5,030

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

206

 

 

 

(10

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of

     tax (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

Net income

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

61

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels &

     Resorts, Inc.

 

 

762

 

 

 

558

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

61

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

1.03

 

 

 

.74

 

 

 

.97

 

 

 

.27

 

 

 

(.01

)

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.09

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

 

1.03

 

 

 

.74

 

 

 

.97

 

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.08

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

1.02

 

 

 

.74

 

 

 

.96

 

 

 

.27

 

 

 

(.01

)

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.09

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

 

1.02

 

 

 

.74

 

 

 

.96

 

 

 

.42

 

 

 

.08

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

 

.85

 

 

 

.80

 

 

 

.75

 

 

 

.46

 

 

 

.30

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

11,408

 

 

$

11,656

 

 

$

12,043

 

 

$

12,642

 

 

$

12,824

 

Debt

 

 

3,649

 

 

 

3,867

 

 

 

3,807

 

 

 

4,569

 

 

 

5,224

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

DiscontinuedPrior to 2014, discontinued operations reflects the operations of properties classified as held for sale, the results of operations of properties prior to their disposition and the gain or loss on those dispositions. We adopted ASU 2014-08 as of January 1, 2014, pursuant to which we only report discontinued operations if a disposal represents a strategic shift. No prior year restatements are permitted for this change in policy.

35



Item 6.

Selected Financial Data (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

The following table presents certain selected historical financial data which has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. for the five years ended December 31, 20132016 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and Part II Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

 

 

Calendar year

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

 

2009

 

 

 

(in millions, except per unit amounts)

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

5,166

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

$

4,714

 

 

$

4,154

 

 

$

3,882

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(137

)

 

 

(188

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (1)

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(70

)

Net income (loss)

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(132

)

 

 

(258

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

321

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(132

)

 

 

(257

)

Net income (loss) available to common unitholders

 

 

321

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(140

)

 

 

(266

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.28

 

 

 

(.01

)

 

 

(.04

)

 

 

(.22

)

 

 

(.32

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

(.12

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

(.02

)

 

 

(.21

)

 

 

(.44

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.28

 

 

 

(.01

)

 

 

(.04

)

 

 

(.22

)

 

 

(.33

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

(.12

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

(.02

)

 

 

(.21

)

 

 

(.45

)

Distributions declared per common unit

 

 

.470

 

 

 

.306

 

 

 

.143

 

 

 

.0408

 

 

 

.025

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

12,814

 

 

$

12,994

 

 

$

13,090

 

 

$

12,410

 

 

$

12,553

 

Debt

 

 

4,759

 

 

 

5,411

 

 

 

5,753

 

 

 

5,477

 

 

 

5,837

 

Preferred units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

Calendar year

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

(in millions, except per unit amounts)

 

Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

5,350

 

 

$

5,321

 

 

$

5,134

 

 

$

5,030

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

206

 

 

 

(10

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of

     tax (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

Net income

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

61

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels &

     Resorts, L.P.

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

62

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

1.05

 

 

 

.76

 

 

 

.99

 

 

 

.28

 

 

 

(.01

)

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

 

1.05

 

 

 

.76

 

 

 

.99

 

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.09

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

1.05

 

 

 

.76

 

 

 

.99

 

 

 

.28

 

 

 

(.01

)

Discontinued operations (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

 

1.05

 

 

 

.76

 

 

 

.99

 

 

 

.43

 

 

 

.09

 

Distributions declared per common unit

 

 

.868

 

 

 

.817

 

 

 

.766

 

 

 

.470

 

 

 

.306

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

11,408

 

 

$

11,656

 

 

$

12,043

 

 

$

12,642

 

 

$

12,824

 

Debt

 

 

3,649

 

 

 

3,867

 

 

 

3,807

 

 

 

4,569

 

 

 

5,224

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

DiscontinuedPrior to 2014, discontinued operations reflects the operations of properties classified as held for sale, the results of operations of properties prior to their disposition and the gain or loss on those dispositions. We adopted ASU 2014-08 as of January 1, 2014, pursuant to which we only report discontinued operations if a disposal represents a strategic shift. No prior year restatements are permitted for this change in policy.

 

36



Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

Overview

Host Inc. operates as a self-managed and self-administered REIT that owns properties and conducts operations through Host L.P., of which Host Inc. is the sole general partner and inof which it holds approximately 98.7%99% of its common OP units as of December 31, 2013.2016. The remainder of Host L.P.’s common OP units are owned by various unaffiliated limited partners. Host Inc. has the exclusive and complete responsibility for Host L.P.’s day-to-day management and control.

Host Inc. is the largest lodging REIT in NAREIT’s composite index and one of the largest owners of luxury and upper upscale hotel properties. As of February 14, 2014,20, 2017, we own 11496 hotels in the United States and internationally and have minority ownership interests in an additional 2418 hotels through joint ventures in the United States, Europe and the Asia/Pacific region. These hotels are operated primarily operated under brand names that are among the most respected and widely recognized in the lodging industry. The majority are located in central business districts of major cities, near airports and in resort/conference destinations that benefit from significant barriers to entry by competitors. Since 2002, the percentage of revenues from our target markets has increased from approximately 55% to 75% in 2013, as we have focused our acquisition efforts on these locations, and similarly disposed of non-core assets. While hotels in these markets still are subject to competitive pressures, we believe this strategy of combining premium brands with superior locations provides opportunities to achieve room rate and occupancy premiums in excess of our competitors.destinations.  

Our Customers

The majority of our customers fall into three broad groups: transient business, group business and contract business, which accounted for approximately 60%, 35%, and 5%, respectively, of our 20132016 room sales. Similar to the majority of the lodging industry, we further categorize business within these broad groups based on characteristics they have in common as follows:

Transient business broadly represents individual business or leisure travelers. Business travelers make up the majority of transient demand at our hotels. Therefore, we will be significantly more affected by trends in business travel than trends in leisure demand. The four key subcategoriesFor a discussion of the transient business group are:

Retail: This is the benchmark rate that a hotel publishes and offers to the general public. It typically is the rate charged to travelers that do not have access to negotiated or discounted rates. It includes the “rack rate,” which typically is applied to rooms during high demand periods and is the highest rate category available. Retail room rates will fluctuate more freely depending on anticipated demand levels (e.g. seasonality and weekday vs. weekend stays).   

Non-Qualified Discount: These include special rates offered by the hotels, including packages, advance-purchase discounts and promotional offers.  These also include rooms booked through online travel agencies (OTA’s).  

Special Corporate: This is a negotiated rate offered to companies and organizations that provide significant levels of room night demand to the hotel or to hotel brands generally. These rates typically are negotiated annually at a discount to the anticipated retail rate. In addition, this category includes rates offered at the prevailing per diem for approved government travel.

Qualified Discount: This category encompasses all discount programs, such as AAA and AARP discounts, rooms booked through wholesale channels, frequent guest program redemptions, and promotional rates and packages offered by a hotel.

Group business represents clusters of guestrooms booked together, usually with a minimum of 10 rooms. The three key sub-categories of the group business category are:

Association: group business related to national and regional association meetings and conventions.

Corporate: group business related to corporate meetings (e.g., product launches, training programs, contract negotiations, and presentations).

Other: group business predominately related to social, military, education, religious, fraternal and youth and amateur sports teams, otherwise known as SMERF business.

Contract business refers to blocks of rooms sold to a specific company for an extended period of time at significantly discounted rates. Airline crews are typical generators of contract demand for our airport hotels. Additionally, contract rates may be utilized by hotels that are located in markets that are experiencing consistently lower levels of demand.customer categories, see “ – Our Customers”.

37


Understanding Our Performance

Our Revenues and Expenses. Our hotels are operated by third-party managers under long-term agreements, pursuant to whichwhich they typically earn base and incentive management fees based on the levels of revenues and profitability of each individual hotel. We provide operating funds, or working capital, which the managers use to purchase inventory and to pay wages, utilities, property taxes and other hotel-level expenses. We generally receive a cash distribution from our hotel managers each month, which distribution reflects hotel-level sales less property-level operating expenses (excluding depreciation).

RevenueOperations from owned hotels represents 99%our domestic portfolio account for approximately 97% of our total revenue.revenues and 3% relate to our international hotels. The following table presents the components of our hotel revenue as a percentage of our total revenue:

 

 

 

% of 20132016

Revenues

 

 

·

Rooms revenue. Occupancy and average daily room rate are the major drivers of rooms revenue. The business mix of the hotel (group versus transient and retail versus discount business) is a significant driver of room rates.

 

6464%

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

Food and beverage revenue. Food & beverage revenues consist of revenues from group functions, which may include both banquet revenue and audio and visual revenues, as well as outlet revenues from the restaurants and lounges at our properties.

 

2930%

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

Other revenue. Occupancy, the nature of the property (e.g., resort, etc.) and its price point are the main drivers of other ancillary revenue, such as attrition and cancellation, parking, golf course, spa, entertainment and other guest services. This category also includes retail and apartment rental revenue.

 

66%

%


Hotel operating expenses represent approximately 97%98% of our total operating costs and expenses. The following table presents the components of our hotel operating expenses as a percentage of our total operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

% of 20132016
Operating

Operating
Costs and

Expenses

 

 

·

Rooms expense. These costs include housekeeping, reservation systems, room supplies, laundry services and front desk costs. Occupancy is the major driver of rooms expense. These costs can increase based on increases in salaries and wages, as well as on the level of service and amenities that are provided.

 

1919%

% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

Food and beverage expense. These expenses primarily include food, beverage and the associated labor costs and will correlate closely with food and beverage revenues.  Group functions with banquet sales and audio and visual components generally will generally have lower overall costs as a percentage of revenues than outlet sales.

 

2323%

% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

Other departmental and support expenses. These expenses include labor and other costs associated with other ancillary revenue, such as parking, golf courses, spas, entertainment and other guest services, as well as labor and other costs associated with administrative departments, sales and marketing, repairs and minor maintenance and utility costs.

 

2728%

% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

Management fees. Base management fees are computed as a percentage of gross revenue. Incentive management fees generally are paid when operating profits exceed certain threshold levels.

 

55%

% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

Other property-level expenses. These expenses consist primarily of real and personal property taxes, ground rent, equipment rent and property insurance. Many of these expenses are relatively inflexible and do not necessarily change based on changes in revenuerevenues at our hotels.

 

88%

% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

Depreciation and amortization expense. This is a non-cash expense that changes primarily based on the acquisition and disposition of hotel properties and the level of past capital expenditures.

 

1515%

% 

The expense components listed above are based on those presented in our consolidated statements of operations. It also is worth noting that wage and benefit costs are spread among various line items. Taken separately, these costs represent approximately 55%56% of our hotel operating expenses.

Key Performance Indicators. Revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) is a commonly used measure within the hotel industry to evaluate hotel operations. RevPAR is defined as the product of the average daily room rate charged and the average daily

38


occupancy achieved. RevPAR does not include food and beverage, parking, or other guest service revenues generated by the property. Although RevPAR does not include these ancillary revenues, it is considered the key indicator of core revenues for many hotels.

RevPAR changes that are driven by occupancy have different implications on overall revenue levels, as well as incremental operating profit, than do changes that are driven by average room rate. For example, increases in occupancy at a hotel will lead to increases in rooms revenues and ancillary revenues, such as food and beverage revenue, as well as additional incremental costs (including housekeeping services, utilities and room amenity costs). RevPAR increases due to higher room rates, however, will not result in additional room-related costs, with the exception of those charged as a percentage of revenue. As a result, changes in RevPAR driven by increases or decreases in average room rates have a greater effect on profitability than do changes in RevPAR caused by occupancy levels.

In discussing our operating results, we present RevPAR and certain other financial data for our hotels on a comparable hotel basis. Comparable hotels are those properties that we have owned for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared and which operations have been included in our consolidated results. Comparable hotels do not include the results of properties acquired or sold, or that incurred business interruption due to significant property damage or large scale capital improvements. We also present RevPAR separately for our comparable consolidated domestic and international (both on a nominal and constant dollar basis) hotels, as well as for our joint venture in Europe. We provide RevPAR results in constant currency due to the number of consolidated properties we have internationally and the effect that exchange rates have on our reporting. We use constant currency because we believe it is useful to investors becauseas it provides clarity on how the hotels are performing in their local markets. For all other measures (net income, operating profit, EBITDA, FFO, etc.) our discussion is only inrefers to nominal US$, which is consistent with our financial statement presentation under GAAP.U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).


We also evaluate the performance of our business through certain non-GAAP financial measures. Each of these non-GAAP financial measures should be considered by investors as supplemental measures to GAAP performance measures such as total revenues, operating profit, net income and earnings per share. We provide a more detailed discussion of these non-GAAP financial measures, how management uses such measures to evaluate our financial condition and operating performanceperformance and a discussion of certain limitations of such measures in “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Our non-GAAP financial measures include:

NAREIT Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and Adjusted FFO per diluted share. We use NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share as supplemental measures of company-wide profitability. NAREIT adopted FFO in order to promote an industry-wide measure of REIT operating performance. We also adjust NAREIT FFO for gains and losses on extinguishment of debt, acquisition costs and litigation gains or losses outside the ordinary course of business.

NAREIT Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and Adjusted FFO per diluted share. We use NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share as supplemental measures of company-wide profitability. NAREIT adopted FFO in order to promote an industry-wide measure of REIT operating performance. We also adjust NAREIT FFO for gains and losses on extinguishment of debt, acquisition costs and litigation gains or losses outside the ordinary course of business.

Hotel adjusted operating profit and margins. Hotel adjusted operating profit measures property-level results before debt service, depreciation and corporate expenses and is a supplemental measure of aggregate property-level profitability. We use hotel adjusted operating profit and associated margins to evaluate the profitability of our comparable hotels.

Comparable Hotel EBITDA. Hotel EBITDA measures property-level results before debt service, depreciation and corporate expenses (as this is a property level measure) and is a supplemental measure of aggregate property-level profitability. We use Hotel EBITDA and associated margins to evaluate the profitability of our comparable hotels.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Earnings before income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is a supplemental measure of the

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is a supplemental measure of our operating performance of our properties and facilitates comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners who are not REITs and other capital-intensive companies. We also adjust EBITDA for gains and losses related to real estate transactions, impairment losses and litigation gains or losses outside the ordinary course of business (“Adjusted EBITDA”).

39


Summary of 20132016 Operating Results

The following table reflects certain line items from our audited statements of operations and the significant operating statistics for the three years ended December 31, 2016 (in millions, except per share and hotel statistics):

Historical Income Statement Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

 

2011

 

 

2011 to 2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2015 to 2016

 

 

2014

 

 

2014 to 2015

 

Total revenues

 

$

5,166

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

 

2.1

%

 

$

4,714

 

 

 

7.3

%

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

5,350

 

 

 

1.5

%

 

$

5,321

 

 

 

0.5

%

Net income (loss)

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

415.9

%

 

 

(16

)

 

N/M

 

Net income

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

36.5

%

 

 

741

 

 

 

(23.8

)%

Operating profit

 

 

512

 

 

 

362

 

 

 

41.4

%

 

 

309

 

 

 

17.2

%

 

 

684

 

 

 

631

 

 

 

8.4

%

 

 

694

 

 

 

(9.1

)%

Operating profit margin under GAAP

 

 

9.9

%

 

 

7.2

%

 

 

270

bps

 

 

6.6

%

 

 

60

bps

 

 

12.6

%

 

 

11.8

%

 

 

80

bps

 

 

13.0

%

 

 

(120

bps)

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

1,306

 

 

$

1,190

 

 

 

9.7

%

 

$

1,018

 

 

 

16.9

%

 

$

1,471

 

 

$

1,409

 

 

 

4.4

%

 

$

1,402

 

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

.42

 

 

$

.08

 

 

 

425.0

%

 

$

(.02

)

 

N/M

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

1.02

 

 

$

.74

 

 

 

37.8

%

 

$

.96

 

 

 

(22.9

)%

NAREIT FFO per diluted share

 

 

1.26

 

 

 

1.04

 

 

 

21.2

%

 

 

.89

 

 

 

16.9

%

 

 

1.69

 

 

 

1.49

 

 

 

13.4

%

 

 

1.57

 

 

 

(5.1

)%

Adjusted FFO per diluted share

 

 

1.31

 

 

 

1.10

 

 

 

19.1

%

 

 

.92

 

 

 

19.6

%

 

 

1.69

 

 

 

1.54

 

 

 

9.7

%

 

 

1.50

 

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable Hotel Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Comparable Hotels (1)

 

 

2012 Comparable Hotels (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2011 to 2012

 

Comparable hotel revenues

 

$

4,670

 

 

$

4,452

 

 

 

4.9

%

 

$

4,428

 

 

$

4,195

 

 

 

5.5

%

Comparable hotel operating profit

 

 

1,190

 

 

 

1,089

 

 

 

9.3

%

 

 

1,061

 

 

 

946

 

 

 

12.2

%

Comparable hotel adjusted operating profit margin

 

 

25.5

%

 

 

24.5

%

 

 

100

bps

 

 

24.0

%

 

 

22.6

%

 

 

140

bps

Change in comparable hotel RevPAR - Constant US$ (2)

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable hotel RevPAR - Nominal US$

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable domestic RevPAR

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable international RevPAR - Constant US$ (2)

 

 

3.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Comparable Hotel Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Comparable Hotels (1)

 

 

2015 Comparable Hotels (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2015 to 2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2014 to 2015

 

Comparable hotel revenues

 

$

4,908

 

 

$

4,776

 

 

 

2.8

%

 

$

4,977

 

 

$

4,825

 

 

 

3.2

%

Comparable hotel EBITDA

 

 

1,364

 

 

 

1,289

 

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

1,345

 

 

 

1,294

 

 

 

3.9

%

Comparable hotel EBITDA margin

 

 

27.8

%

 

 

27.0

%

 

 

80

bps

 

 

27.0

%

 

 

26.8

%

 

 

20

bps

Change in comparable hotel RevPAR -

     Constant US$ (2)

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable hotel RevPAR -

     Nominal US$ (2)

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable domestic

     RevPAR

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in comparable international

     RevPAR - Constant US$ (2)

 

 

7.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Comparable hotel operating statistics for 20132016 and 20122015 are based on 10588 comparable hotels as of December 31, 2013,2016, while the comparable hotel operating statistics for 20122015 and 20112014 are based on 10395 comparable hotels as of December 31, 2012.2015.

(2)

For a discussion of our constant US$ and nominal US$ presentation, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

Revenue per Available Room

In 2013,2016, on a constant US$ basis, RevPAR at our comparable hotels increased 5.8%2.7% compared to 2012, marking2015, representing the fourth straightseventh consecutive year of positive RevPAR growth. Throughout the year, increased group and leisure business helped push occupancy to near record levels for our Company. However, reduced corporate profits and political and economic uncertainty led to a slowdown in corporate transient demand, limiting growth in average rates, as the business mix shifted from higher-rated corporate demand to lower-rated discount business. During the first half of the year, we also benefited from less disruption from renovations at several of our comparable properties. At the same time, supply growth exceeded historic cumulative average growth, particularly in many of our major markets, including New York, Houston and Boston. Softening inbound travel from international markets due to the relative strength of the U.S. dollar also put pressure on demand in our major markets. These trends, coupled with increased price transparency from online travel agencies, have inhibited room rate growth.

RevPAR growth in excess2016 was both rate and occupancy driven, as room rates improved 1.0% on a constant US$ basis and occupancy improved 130 basis points to 78.5%. Group revenue increased 4.5%, driven by a 2.1% increase in room nights coupled with a 2.4% increase in rates. Meanwhile, transient demand was hampered by softening business travel and reduced international travel. Transient revenues increased 1.2% for the year driven by a 0.7% increase in average rate and a 0.5% increase in room nights sold.

Comparable RevPAR at our domestic portfolio increased 2.5% for the year, driven by a 130 basis point improvement in occupancy and a 0.8% improvement in room rates. Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and San Diego led our domestic portfolio with RevPAR increases of 8.8%, 6.7%, and 5.5%. While the overall growth, respectively, driven by improvements in the economy since the 2008-2009 recession has been slow, particularly with regards to GDP growthboth occupancy and the level of unemployment, specific drivers of lodging demand have proven to be more resilient. In particular, corporate business, which is oneroom rates in each of the most important demand driversmarkets. Our New York and Houston markets lagged the portfolio with RevPAR decreases of our portfolio, has strengthened as corporate profits3.0% and business investment have increased at a much greater rate than1.1%, respectively, during the overall economy. Additionally, our domestic target markets have benefited from an increase in demand from travelyear primarily due to the U.S. as international arrivals increased.recent influx of new supply, the impact of which will continue into 2017.  

On a constant US$ basis, RevPAR at our comparable consolidated international hotels increased 3.9%outperformed our portfolio in 2013. The2016 with an increase reflects improvementof 7.8%, led by our Latin American properties, which recorded a 15.2% increase in average room rate in all of our consolidated international markets, largely offset by a decrease in occupancy of 5.6 percentage points at ourRevPAR. Our Rio de Janeiro properties in Latin America, which was negatively affected by on-going construction atbenefited from the 2016 Olympics and Paralympics, while the JW Marriott Hotel Mexico City.City also experienced strong improvement in average rate. Our Canadian properties outperformed driven by increased group business in both Calgary and Toronto. Comparable RevPAR in constant euros for the unconsolidated Euro JV properties decreased 2.0% for the year. The decrease was due to slow economic growth and an uncertain political climate that reduced demand, particularly at the joint venture’s properties in Brussels and Paris, where operations have yet to return to levels seen prior to the terrorist attacks in those cities.

RevPAR growthRooms

Total rooms revenues increased 0.8% for the full year, reflecting the 2.7% increase in 2013 at our comparable hotels was both rate and occupancy driven, as room rates improved 4.2%,RevPAR on a nominal US$constant dollar basis, partially offset by lost revenue from our 2016 and occupancy improved 100 basis points to 76%2015 hotel dispositions and currency translation effects for our international


properties. Total room expenses decreased by 1.0%, which is aboveprimarily reflecting hotel sales as well as our pre-recession occupancy levels in 2007. Ourfocus on cost controls. Comparable room revenues increased 2.9% for the full year, while comparable room expenses increased only 1.4%, as operators have beenwere able to leverage the higher occupancy levels in order to gradually increase room rates, particularly for our transient business. Therefore, much of the room revenue improvement for the year was driven by improvement in transient demand, asdrive profitability through improved productivity.

40


Food and Beverage

transient revenue increased 7.5%, benefiting from an increase in occupancy and a positive mix shift to higher rated business, and group revenue increased 2.6%.

Food and beverage revenues increased 2.0% for 2016, reflecting the 1.7% increase at our comparable hotels increased 4.0% for 2013.hotels. The increase was driven primarily by a positive mix shift togrowth in banquet and audio visual revenues, which provide higher overall operating margins than outlet revenue, as catered functions generally are more profitable. Additionally, outlet revenue increased, particularly in the second half of the year, as a result of strategic efforts to driveTotal food and beverage profitability by renovatingexpenses and repositioning restaurants at certain of our properties. Food and beverage revenue has significantly benefited from restaurant repositionings and renovations completed over the past three years. Overall,comparable hotel food and beverage revenuesexpenses increased by 5.9% compared to 2012.a moderate 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively, which allowed for strong profitability growth.  

In aggregate, revenues for our owned hotels increased $327 million to $5.1 billion for the year, while other revenues decreased $220 million.  The decline in other revenues was due to the expiration of the lease on the 53 Courtyard by Marriott hotels leased from Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”) on December 31, 2012. Accordingly, total revenues increased $107 million to approximately $5.2 billion for 2013.Operating Profit

Operating margins (calculated based on GAAP operating profit as a percentage of GAAP revenues) increased 27080 basis points for the full year 2013.2016. These operating margins are affected significantly by several items, including operations from recently acquired hotels,dispositions, depreciation, impairments, and corporate expenses. Our comparable hotel adjusted operating profitEBITDA margins, which exclude these items, also increased 10080 basis points to 25.5%27.8%. The improvements in both GAAP operating profit margins and comparable hotel EBITDA margins were driven by improvement in higher margin group business throughout the increaseyear, coupled with increases in average room rate, as well as a 7.9% increaseattrition and cancellation fees, decreases in comparable foodutility and beverage profit.insurance costs and the ability of our operators to improve productivity. We have focused on improving productivity at some of our largest hotels over the past two years by initiating time and motion studies. These studies have resulted in hotel managers establishing tighter labor model standards and improved and expanded forecasting tools, which allow managers to more effectively schedule labor based on demand and to minimize excess staffing, thereby reducing costs.

Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO per Diluted Share

Net income for Host Inc. improved $262increased $206 million in 20132016 to $325 million. Net income benefited from$771 million due primarily to the improvementimprovements in operating profit as well asoperations, a $158 million increase in gains on dispositions, and a decrease in interest expense, including a decrease of $69$41 million due to the repayment or refinancing of debt at lower interest rates, a decrease in impairment expense of $59 million andextinguishment costs, partially offset by an increase in gains on hotel dispositions of $49 million. Adjusted EBITDA, which is defined as EBITDA adjusted for gains and losses related to real estate transactions, impairmentincome tax expense and other items, increased $116a decline in equity in earnings of affiliates, as the Euro JV sold nine hotels in 2015. We also recorded a gain of $12 million or 9.7%, to $1.3 billion.

During 2013,for proceeds received for the disruption of operations at the New Orleans Marriott caused by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. As a result, Host Inc.’s diluted income per common share improved $0.34 per share37.8% to $0.42 per common share. The improvement in our income per diluted share reflects the improvement in operating results at our hotels as described above. Host Inc.’s$1.02. Adjusted FFO per dilutedDiluted Share, which excludes gains on dispositions, debt extinguishment costs, and other real estate transactions, including depreciation, increased 9.7% to $1.69 per share. Net income, NAREIT and Adjusted FFO and the related per share measures benefited from the following:

Adjusted EBITDA increased 19.1%$62 million to $1.31 per diluted$1,471 million, reflecting improvement in hotel operations, despite a net reduction due to property transactions, including the European joint venture’s 2015 hotel dispositions;

Per share for 2013.measures improved due to the purchase of 52 million shares during 2016 and 2015. The anti-dilutive effect of these purchases is computed on a weighted average basis.  

The trends and transactions described above for Host Inc. affected similarly the operating results for Host L.P,L.P., as the only significant difference between the Host Inc. and Host L.P. statements of operations relates to the treatment of income attributable to the outside partnerspartners of Host L.P. For the year, Host L.P.’s net income improved $262increased $206 million to $325$771 million, and the diluted income per common unit improved $0.34increased 38.2% to $1.05 per common unit to $0.43 per common unit.

20142017 Outlook

We believe that the broad economic trends that have translated into the steady improvement in lodging demand should continue in 2014.  InThere is cautious optimism for the United States according to Blue Chip Economic Indicators, the consensus estimate for realeconomy in 2017. In 2016, GDP growth in 2014 currently is 2.8%. This growth rate is a notable increase over 2013, dueslowed to an improved outlook surrounding private sector demand and consumer sentiment as well asapproximately 1.6% while business investment declined slightly as uncertainty weighed on confidence and international travel, which are particularly importantcorporate demand. However, several economic indicators, of demand at properties located in our targeted gateway markets.including improving corporate profitability and strengthening consumer confidence, point to the potential for continued and possibly stronger growth this year.  Additionally, significant impediments to growth due to governmental fiscal policy in 2013,the new administration and Congress have signaled or proposed several initiatives, such as a decrease in corporate taxation, lower regulatory burdens and an increase in infrastructure spending that may result in increased business investment, although the Federal government shutdown in the fourth quarter, uncertainty due to the threattiming of the potential U.S. credit default and austerity efforts at the state and local levels, are not expected to repeat or to have the same negative year-over-year effect for 2014.any increases remains uncertain.  At the same time, however, certain key factors continuethere is an expectation that U.S. monetary policy will tighten in 2017, leading to affect negativelyan increase in interest rates and further strengthening for the economic recovery and add to general market uncertainty. These factors include, but are not limitedU.S. dollar, which could lead to continued political uncertainty with respectsoftening of international travel to U.S. economic policy, including the potential effects of the tapering of the bond-buying program by the Federal Reserve, continued high levels of unemployment, the tenuous nature of the Euro Zone recovery, the slow-down in growth in China, and slower growth and elevated risks associated with emerging markets. As a result ofUnited States.  

Based on these economic trends, we believe the overall improvement in the economic climate will result in a steady increase in demand for our domestic portfolio during 2014.

In Europe, we expect moderate demand growth, consistent with the slowly improving economic climate. For the Euro JV properties, we anticipate that this moderateU.S. travel demand growth will leadremain stable in the near-term. Strengthening consumer confidence and strong employment numbers have the potential to modest improvements in RevPAR. Ourbuoy the transient travel segment. Additionally, demand for our


lodging portfolio of upper-upscale properties in Latin America are expectedmajor markets is highly correlated to exhibit solid RevPAR improvement as Rio de Janeirobusiness investment, which we anticipate will benefit from increased leisure demand generated by the FIFA World Cup. In the Asia/Pacific region, we expect that our propertiesstrengthen in Australia and New Zealand will exhibit moderate growth in RevPAR as the increases in new supply will be low.  

41


Over the same period, we have experienced relatively low2017. However, supply growth significantly accelerated in upper upscale hotels in most of our target markets due to the long planning cycle of hotel development projects, lack of available credit in prior years,2016, and the pricing of upper upscale hotels, which have continued to trade below replacement cost.  As a result, demand has exceeded supply growth in the industry.  Overall, we expect this trend is expected to continue into 2014, with2017. In particular, the exceptionmarkets in which we own a significant number of the New York and Washington, D.C. markets, whereour hotels have experienced above-average supply growth during this cycle. The continued increase in supply will limit our managers’ ability to grow room rate in the near-term and could lead to slight declines in occupancy. Additionally, rate growth is expected to exceedinhibited by the historical industry average during 2014.   increasing popularity of online sharing sites such as Airbnb as well as online booking sites which increase price transparency.

As a result of these trends, we anticipate that we will continue to believe thatexperience high levels of occupancy in 2017. In January 2017, comparable RevPAR increased 7.4% for the strong overall fundamentals inmonth, on a constant U.S. dollar basis, primarily driven by the lodging industry should drive improvements inperformance of the Washington, D.C. market, which benefited from the Presidential inauguration and Women’s March. However, the continued pressures from increased supply are expected to inhibit rate growth, leading to limited RevPAR growth and operating results. Specifically, based on our current group bookings, we believe there isimprovement for the potential for increasing group demand, which would allow our operators to shiftremainder of the business mix to higher-rated corporate group and transient demand as opposed to lower-rated transient discount business.year. As a result, we believe the majority of theanticipate RevPAR growth for 2014 will be driven by improvements in average rate, as we expect occupancy growth will be similar to that experienced in 2013. Forour comparable hotels on a constant dollar basis of between 0.0% and 2.0% for the full year 2014,2017. Additionally, comparisons between our 2016 and 2017 results will be affected by our recent dispositions, as in 2016 we believe these trends will resultrecognized revenues of $166 million, net income (excluding gain on sale) of $21 million, and Adjusted EBITDA of $37 million for the ten properties sold in improved operating performance2016 and comparable hotel RevPAR growth on a constant US$ basis of 5% to 6%. We anticipate that comparable food and beverage and other revenue will increase approximately 3% to 4% in 2014 driven in part byone property sold year-to-date 2017.

As noted above, the expected increase in group demand.

While we believe thatcurrent outlook for the lodging industry will continue to improve,is uncertain; therefore, there can be no assurances that any increases in hotel revenues or earnings at our properties will continue for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, slower than anticipatedanticipated growth in the economy and changes in travel patterns. See Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Strategic Initiatives

We have executed on nearly $500 million of asset dispositions in 2016, and another $172 million through February 20, 2017. We also were able to complete several value enhancement, redevelopment and return on investment initiatives. The proceeds generated from our hotel dispositions, coupled with cash from operations, allowed us to distribute a total of $814 million to our stockholders through common dividends and common stock repurchases. Subsequent to year end we acquired the Don CeSar for $214 million.

For 2017, we intend to continue our disciplined approach to capital allocation to strengthen our portfolio and deliver stockholder value. We intend to take advantage of our strong capital position and overall scale to acquire upper-upscale, luxury, and high-quality select-service properties, through single asset or portfolio acquisitions, that we believe have sustainable competitive advantages to drive long-term value. At the same time, we will opportunistically sell assets. We also continue to critically analyze our portfolio to take advantage of the inherent value of our real estate holdings for its highest and best use, such as the 2016 acquisition of the ground lease at our Key Bridge Marriott, located along the Potomac River overlooking Washington, D.C. We anticipate that the level of capital intensive redevelopment projects will decline compared to 2016. We intend to deliver value to our stockholders through a meaningful dividend, and, depending on market conditions, may also execute on our recently authorized 2017 stock repurchase program, while looking to maintain our investment grade rating.  

Portfolio

Acquisitions.  In July 2016, we purchased the ground lease at the Key Bridge Marriott for $54 million. The land is located along the Potomac River, overlooking Washington, D.C., and we currently are exploring further development and value enhancement opportunities for the asset.

Investing ActivitiesOn February 16, 2017, we purchased The Don CeSar and the related Beach House Suites in St. Pete Beach, Florida for $214 million and selected Davidson Hotels & Resorts as manager. The hotel has been recognized for excellence by Historic Hotels of America, with 347 rooms and suites along the Florida Gulf coast, award-winning dining options and over 38,000 square feet of meeting space.

Acquisitions Dispositions.and Development.  We continue to seek investment opportunitiesstrategically dispose of assets that we believe will experience lower growth and/or higher capital expenditures requirements. During 2016, we disposed of 10 properties for proceeds of approximately $467 million and recorded a gain on sale of $243 million. Since we announced our strategy to exit the Asia-Pacific market in our target markets, whichSeptember 2015, we have identified as those that are expected to have the greatest lodging demand growth, the fewest additions to supply, and the strongest potential for revenue growth. We see increased competition for acquisitions insold all seven of our target markets due to the accessibility of capital and the current availability of inexpensive financing. Consequently, pricing for upper upscale and luxury assets has become more aggressive, and recent transaction values have approached replacement cost levels. Our acquisition strategy also includes the acquisition or development of midscale and upscale properties in select target markets. Since January 1, 2013, we have completed the following transactions:

Acquisitions

Subsequent to year-end 2013, we acquired the 151-room Powell Hotel in San Francisco, including the fee simple interest in the land, for $75 million. The property includes a significant long-term retail lease with Sephora, a leading provider of perfume and cosmetics. We intend to invest $22 million in an extensive redevelopment of the property beginning late in 2014.

On May 31, 2013, we acquired the fee-simple interest in the 426-room Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach in Honolulu, Hawaii for $138.5 million.

In December 2013, we made the final incremental payment of $19.9 million for the purchase of the fee simple interest in the land at the New York Marriott Marquis Times Square. In addition, $25 million of the payments made pursuant to the terms of the ground lease have been attributed towards the purchase of the land. The purchase was completed in conjunction with our 2012 lease of the existing retail space to Vornado Realty Trust and its on-going redevelopment which is expected to be completed in early 2015.  

Development

On November 12, 2013, we opened the 255-room Hyatt Place Nashville Downtown through a 50/50 joint venture with White Lodging Services. Total development costs for the project are approximately $43 million. We have contributed approximately $6 million to the joint venture.

We have invested approximately R$94 million ($45 million) as of December 31, 2013 related to the development of twoNew Zealand hotels totaling 405 rooms in Rio de Janeiro. The hotels are expected to open in the second quarter of 2014 and will be managed by Accor under the ibis and Novotel brands. Our total investment is expected to be R$131 million ($67 million).

We hold a 67% non-controlling interest in a 131–unit vacation ownership project under development in Maui, Hawaii, adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa. The total development cost of the project is expected to be $200 million, of which $110 million will be financed through a construction loan. We have contributed $47 million, including land valued at $36 million, as of December 2013. Sales of the timeshares are underway and we anticipate the project to open in late 2014.  

42


Dispositions. We have sold seven properties (five in 2013, two in 2014) since January 1, 2013 for a total sales price of $960 million. These properties are non-core assets whereapproximately NZ$257 million ($174 million), including the repayment of NZ$105 million ($72 million) of mortgage debt. Subsequent to year end, we believesold the potentialJW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa for growth is constrained or where we were able to opportunistically take advantage of pricing in$172 million, including the market. Significant dispositions include:$12 million FF&E fund retained at the hotel.

the February 12, 2014 sale of Courtyard Nashua for $10 million;

the January 10, 2014 sale of 89% of the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown based on a market value of $303 million. Total proceeds were $290 million, which includes our 11% portion of the proceeds received from the $230 million mortgage debt issued by the partnership at closing;

the December 18, 2013 sale of the Dallas/Addison Marriott Quorum by the Galleria for $56 million;

the November 20, 2013 sale of the Four Seasons Hotel Atlanta for $63 million;

the November 1, 2013 sale of the Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront for $87 million;

the June 28, 2013 sale of The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco for $161 million; and

the January 11, 2013 sale of the Atlanta Marriott Marquis for $293 million.


During 2014, we believe the disposition market should remain favorable, particularly for assets in our target markets. We are also seeing increased interest in our non-target markets as a result of increased liquidity and plan to remain opportunistic with our disposition activity.Capital Investments

Value Enhancement Initiatives.Enhancement. We also lookintend to enhance the value of our portfolio by identifying and executing strategies designed to achieve the highest and best use of all aspects of our properties. This initiative may include new relationships with independent operators that may be an improved fit for smaller or unique properties, extending ground leases, or restructuring management agreements, as well asand developing or disposing of underutilized spaceland connected to our properties. We believe thatDuring 2016, we reached an agreement to franchise the successful executionWestin Cincinnati and selected HEI Hotels & Resorts as the operator. Including the selection of these projects will create significant value for the company. During 2013,independent managers at six of our properties in 2015, we completed the following value-enhancement projects:currently have 16 third-party managed hotels in our consolidated and joint venture portfolio.

On April 1, 2013, we sold approximately four acres of excess land adjacent to our Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa to a luxury homebuilder for $24 million and recognized a $21 million gain on the sale. The land, which previously was used for tennis courts, has been approved for the development and sale of 79 luxury condominiums.

We reached an agreement with the city of Houston for a new 40-year ground lease for the Houston Airport Marriott, which was set to expire in 2019. Under the terms of the agreement, in addition to the extension, the ground lease expense as a percentage of revenues has been reduced in return for an investment of approximately $35 million to renovate and enhance the hotel, including complete renovation of the guestrooms and public spaces, as well as elevator and systems upgrades.   

We successfully converted the Memphis Marriott Downtown to the Sheraton Memphis Downtown, which is franchised and managed by Davidson Hotels & Resorts and are in the process of completing the capital plan to reposition the property. We believe that this transaction matches the appropriate brand, operator and capital plan for the market and, as a result, will increase the value of the property.  

We reached an agreement with Marriott International with respect to the Calgary Marriott Downtown. We agreed to extend the term of the management agreement and received an increase in the owner’s priority threshold, which will reduce current and future management fees. We intend to invest $23 million in repositioning capital expenditures at the hotel.  

In connection with the negotiation of the franchise and management agreements described above, we also received the right from Marriott International to franchise three additional hotels and accelerated a similar franchise right on a fourth hotel. We believe that this additional flexibility substantially improves the value of these hotels by increasing the potential pool of interested buyers.

43


Capital ExpendituresExpenditures Projects. We continue to pursue opportunities to enhance asset value through select capital improvements, including projects that are designed specifically to increase the eco-efficiency of our hotels, incorporate elements of sustainable design and replace aging equipment and systems with more efficient technology. Capital expenditures have totaled approximately $2.7 billion over the past five years and, as a result, we believe that our properties are in a strong competitive position relative to their market competitors. During 2013,2016, we completed renovations of 6,900to 5,000 guestrooms, over 420,000approximately 385,000 square feet of meeting space and approximately 150,000182,000 square feet of public space.

Redevelopment and Return on Investment Expenditures. These projects are designed to increase cash flow and improve profitability by capitalizing on changing market conditions and the favorable location of our properties. Approximately $226 million was spent on redevelopment and return on investment projects during 2016 compared to $275 million in 2015. Significant projects included the following:

Redevelopment and Return on Investment Capital Expenditures. Redevelopment and ROI projects primarily consist of large-scale redevelopment projects designed to increase cash flow and improve profitability by capitalizing on changing market conditions and the favorable location of our projects. Approximately $97 million was spent on these projects during 2013 compared to $144 million in 2012. Significant redevelopment and ROI capital expenditures during the year included the following projects:

o

NewarkHyatt Regency San Francisco Airport Marriott the completion ofWe completed a 20,000 square foot ballroom and renovation to approximately 25,000 square feet of existing ballroom and meeting space. This space was completed in time for the 2014 Super Bowl at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey;

o

Orlando World Center Marriott – the redevelopment of the pool area, including new waterslides, activity areas and dining facilities as part of the large-scale renovation at the hotel that began in 2012;

o

JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa – the construction of a new 17,000 square-foot pavilion; and

o

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples – the repositioning of the Terrazza, Dusk and Grill food and beverage outlets.

For 2014, we plan to spend between $70 million and $80 million for redevelopment and ROI projects. The projects will include the renovation of all 600 rooms at the Sheraton Memphis Downtown as part of the conversion from the Marriott brand, the repositioning of 11 restaurants throughout our portfolio, and the beginning phases of the redevelopment at the Houston Airport Marriott in connection with the extension of its ground lease.

Acquisition Capital Expenditures.  In conjunction with the acquisition of a property, we prepare capital and operational improvement plans designed to maximize profitability.  During 2013, we spent approximately $36 million on acquisition capital projects compared to $128 million during 2012 for these designated projects at hotels we acquired from 2010 through 2013. During 2013, significant acquisition capital expenditure projects completed included the following:

o

Thecomprehensive renovation of all 897 guest rooms at the Grand Hyatt Washington, which included use of environmentally-friendly materials and installation of energy efficient thermostat systems; and

o

The renovation of all 1,625 guest rooms at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego. We also began the renovation of over 100,000 square feet of meeting space and the expansion of the fitness center as part of the multi-year $84 million renovation of the hotel.

For 2014, we expect to invest between $30 million and $35 million for acquisition capital expenditures, including the completion of the meeting space and fitness center renovation at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego.

Renewalguestrooms and Replacement Capital Expenditures. We spent $303 million and $366 million on renewal and replacement expenditures during 2013 and 2012, respectively.  These expenditures are designed to ensure that our high standards for product quality are maintained and to enhance the overall competitiveness of our properties in the marketplace. These projects included the renovation of over 4,300 rooms, 65,000 square feet of public space and 350,000 square feet of meeting space in 2013. Projects that were underway during the fourth quarter of 2013 included the renovation of 230 suites at the Fairmont Kea Lani, the guestrooms at The Westin Indianapolis, The Westin Waltham-Boston and the Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa, as well as the ballroom at the JW Marriott Washington D.C. Major projects completed in 2013 included the following:

o

The renovation of all 312 guestrooms at the JW Marriott Hotel Mexico City;

o

The renovation of 1,452 guestrooms, 47 suites and the concierge lounge at the San Francisco Marriott Marquis;

o

The renovation of almost 40,00060,000 square feet of meeting and public space, at The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner;including the renovation and conversion of a restaurant into an additional 15,000 square feet of meeting space.

o

Denver Marriott Tech Center – A transformational renovation, including newly designed guestrooms, additional meeting and public space, and a new concept restaurant. The project includes sustainability features such as LED lighting in guestrooms and public spaces, new energy-efficient HVAC units in guestrooms and high efficiency hot water and boiler plant upgrades.

o

The Phoenician - The significant renovation project is expected to be completed over a two-year period. The first phase, completed in 2016, included a redesign of the guest rooms and canyon suites and updates to the façade. The second phase is expected to be completed in 2017 and includes a complete redesign and renovation of over 36,000the main public areas, pools, restaurant and newly constructed spa and fitness building.

o

Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina –The property now features 280,000 square feet of meeting space at The Westin Denver Downtown, includingfollowing completion of the installationconstruction of energy efficient LED lighting.a 152,000 square foot exhibit hall encompassing ballrooms, grand foyers and outdoor event space overlooking the marina.

44For 2017, we expect to spend between $90 million and $115 million for redevelopment and ROI projects, representing a 54% decrease from 2016.


Renewal and Replacement Capital Expenditures. We spent $293 million and $383 million on renewal and replacement expenditures during 2016 and 2015, respectively. These expenditures are designed to ensure that our standards for product quality are maintained and to enhance the overall competitiveness of our properties in the marketplace. Projects that were completed during 2016 included rooms renovations at The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey, Houston Marriott Medical Center, Coronado Island Marriott Resort & Spa, W Seattle and The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner. We also renovated a 40,000 square foot ballroom at the Hyatt Regency Reston, the ballroom at Marina del Rey Marriott and a restaurant at each of the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego and The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island. At the Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa, we renovated over 65,000 square feet of meeting and public space, including a restaurant, the ballroom and event lawn.

We expect that our investment in renewal and replacement expenditures in 20142017 will total approximately $320$275 million to $340$300 million. These projects will include thephase two of a rooms renovation of an additional 220 suites at the Fairmont Kea Lani,Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre Hotel, a rooms renovation at San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf, meeting space renovations at Sheraton Boston Hotel, Hyatt Regency Reston and The WestinJW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead Atlanta, and a ballroom and meeting space renovation at Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa.New Orleans Marriott.  

International Joint Venture InvestmentsReturn of capital

Stock Repurchase Program and Dividends. We continue to utilize joint ventures to expand our portfolio and to help diversify exposure to target markets internationally. During 2013, the Euro JV completed the following transactions:

On August 29, 2013, the Euro JV acquired the 465-room Sheraton Stockholm Hotel in Sweden, for approximately €102 million ($135 million). In connection with the acquisition, the Euro JV entered into a €61 million ($81 million) mortgage loan with an interest rate of 5.67% that matures in 2018. We contributed approximately €14 million ($19 million) to the Euro JV in connection with this acquisition, funded through a draw on our credit facility.

On October 22, 2013, the Euro JV sold the Courtyard Paris La Defense West – Colombes for €19 million ($26 million) plus certain customary closing adjustments and recognized a gain of approximately €1.7 million ($2.3 million).

Financing Activities

We continued to pursue our long-term goalHost Inc.’s Board of Directors authorized a stronger balance sheet by lowering our debt-to-equity ratio and extending debt maturities by raising and deploying capital strategically, thereby improving our overall leverage and coverage ratios. We believe that lower leverage reduces our overall cost of capital and earnings volatility and increases access to capital, thereby providing the necessary flexibility to take advantage of opportunities throughout the lodging cycle,new stock repurchase program for 2017 under which we considercan repurchase up to $500 million of common stock. The common stock may be purchased from time to time,


depending upon market conditions, and repurchases may be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions or by other means, including through one or more trading plans designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The number of shares to be purchased also will depend upon operating results, funds generated by sales activity, dividends that may be required by those sales and investment options that may be available, including reinvesting in the portfolio or acquiring new hotels, as well as maintaining our strong leverage position. The program does not obligate us to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be suspended at any time at our discretion. The program replaces the previous stock repurchase program that expired on December 31, 2016. During 2016, we repurchased 13.8 million shares at an average price of $15.79 for a key competitive advantage. As our operations have improved, we have focused strategicallytotal purchase price of approximately $218 million. Approximately 0.7 million of the purchases were in the fourth quarter at an average price of $15.82 per share.

During 2016, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.85 per share with respect to Host Inc.’s common stock, an increase of 6.3% over the prior year. Accordingly, Host L.P. made a distribution of $0.868270 per unit with respect to its common OP units for 2016. On February 21, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share on raising and deploying capitalits common stock. The dividend will be paid on April 17, 2017, to improve our leverage ratios, while at the same time completing substantial investments in our portfolio through acquisitions and capital investments. Since January 1, 2013, we have used proceeds from asset dispositions and available cash to repay or refinance $1.6 billionstockholders of debt with a weighted average interest rate of 6.3%. Additionally,record on March 1, 2014, we intend to repay the $300 million mortgage loan secured31, 2017. The amount of any future dividend will be determined by The Ritz-Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa at maturity. AsHost Inc.’s Board of Directors.

There can be no assurances that any future dividends or stock buybacks will match or exceed those set forth above for any number of reasons, including a result of these transactions, and subsequent to the expected March 2014 repayment, we will have decreased our weighted average interest rate compared to 2012 by 45 basis points, to 4.95%, and lengthened our weighted average debt maturity by 0.9 years to 6.0 years. Specifically, we completed the following significant financing transactions:

We issued $400 million of 3 34% Series D senior notes due October of 2023 for net proceeds of $396 million. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Series D senior notes, together with cash on hand, were used to redeem the $400 million of 9% Series T senior notes due 2017 at an aggregate price of $418 million in May 2013.

We redeemed $400 million of our 634% Series Q senior notes due 2016 for an aggregate price of $404 million. We redeemed the remaining $150 million of the Series Q senior notes subsequent to year end.  

In March 2013 we called the remaining $175 million face amount of our 314% exchangeable senior debentures for redemption and holders of $174 million of the debentures elected to exchange their debentures for shares of Host Inc. common stock totaling approximately 11.7 million shares, rather than receive the cash redemption proceeds. The remaining $1 million of debentures were redeemed for cash.

We repaid the 4.75%, $246 million mortgage loan on the Orlando World Center Marriott and the 8.51%, $31 million loan on the Westin Denver Downtown. Additionally, we refinanced the 5.55%, $134 million mortgage loan secured by the Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa with a $150 million mortgage loan that bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.75% and matures January 1, 2024.  

We issued 16.9 million common shares under our “at-the-market” offering programs. The shares were issued at an average price of $17.78 per share for net proceeds of approximately $297 million. The net proceeds were used to fund recent acquisitions, development projects and a portion of our ROI/redevelopment expenditures.  

After adjusting for hotel acquisitions and dispositions, debt repayments and dividend payments that have occurred subsequent to year end and the expected March 1, 2014 mortgage loan repayment, we will have approximately $779 million of available capacity under our credit facility and a debt balance of $4,084 million.  

decline in operations or an increase in liquidity needs. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and access to the capital markets in order to paymeet our near-term debt maturities, fund our capital expenditures programs and take advantage of investment opportunities.

Financing transactions

We executed successfully on our strategy to decrease our leverage as measured by our net debt to EBITDA ratio and to reduce our debt service obligations, leading to an increase in our interest coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios and an investment grade rating for Host L.P.’s senior notes. These improvements were due to stronger operations, successful acquisitions and other investments, the majority of which were completed with available cash and proceeds from equity issuances, and the repayment and refinancing of debt in order to extend maturity dates and obtain lower interest rates.

During 2016, we repaid $137 million of mortgage debt and had net repayments under the revolver portion of our credit facility of $82 million. At December 31, 2016, our weighted average interest rate is 3.8% and our weighted average debt maturity is 5.2 years. We have a debt balance of $3.6 billion and a balanced maturity schedule wherein not more than 23% of our outstanding debt, representing 4% of our U.S. GAAP gross asset value, is due in any given year. Assuming the exercise of credit facility extensions, we have no significant debt maturities until 2019.


The following graph summarizes our aggregate debt maturities as of February 21, 2017:

(1)

The term loan and credit facility agreements contain extension options that would extend the maturity of both instruments to 2019, subject to meeting certain conditions, including payment of a fee.

For a detailed discussion, see “—Liquidity and CapitalCapital Resources.” For a detailed discussion of our significant debt activities, see “Note 4.  Debt” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

45


Results of Operations

The following table reflects certain line items from our audited statements of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2016 (in millions, except percentages):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

 

2011

 

 

2011 to 2012

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Owned hotel revenues

 

$

5,115

 

 

$

4,788

 

 

 

6.8

%

 

$

4,464

 

 

 

7.3

%

Other revenues (1)

 

 

51

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

(81.2

)%

 

 

250

 

 

 

8.4

%

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property-level costs (2)

 

 

4,533

 

 

 

4,601

 

 

 

(1.5

)%

 

 

4,296

 

 

 

7.1

%

Corporate and other expenses (3)

 

 

121

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

13.1

%

 

 

111

 

 

 

(3.6

)%

Gain on insurance settlements

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

N/M

 

 

 

2

 

 

N/M

 

Operating profit

 

 

512

 

 

 

362

 

 

 

41.4

%

 

 

309

 

 

 

17.2

%

Interest expense

 

 

304

 

 

 

373

 

 

 

(18.5

)%

 

 

371

 

 

 

0.5

%

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(31

)

 

 

(32.3

)%

 

 

1

 

 

N/M

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

 

N/M

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(70.4

)%

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

62.0

%

 

 

11

 

 

N/M

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests

 

$

8

 

 

$

2

 

 

 

300

%

 

$

(1

)

 

N/M

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Inc.

 

 

317

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

419.7

%

 

 

(15

)

 

N/M

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host L.P.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests

 

$

4

 

 

$

1

 

 

 

300

%

 

$

(1

)

 

N/M

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host L.P.

 

 

321

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

417.7

%

 

 

(15

)

 

N/M

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2015 to 2016

 

 

2014

 

 

2014 to 2015

 

Total revenues

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

5,350

 

 

 

1.5

%

 

$

5,321

 

 

 

0.5

%

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property-level costs (1)

 

 

4,655

 

 

 

4,627

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

4,594

 

 

 

0.7

 

Corporate and other expenses(2)

 

 

106

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

12.8

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

118.6

 

Gain on insurance and business

     interruption settlements

 

 

15

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

650.0

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

(80.0

)

Operating profit

 

 

684

 

 

 

631

 

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

694

 

 

 

(9.1

)

Interest expense

 

 

154

 

 

 

227

 

 

 

(32.2

)

 

 

207

 

 

 

9.7

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

253

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

166.3

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

(59.7

)

Provision for income taxes

 

 

40

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

344.4

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

(35.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-

     controlling interests

 

 

9

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

28.6

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

(22.2

)

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

 

762

 

 

 

558

 

 

 

36.6

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

(23.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host L.P.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to non-

     controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host L.P.

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

36.5

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

(23.8

)

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For 2012 and 2011, respectively, includes the results of the 53 Courtyard by Marriott properties leased from Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”). These leases expired on December 31, 2012.  

(2)

Amounts represent total operating costs and expenses from our consolidated statements of operations, less corporate and other expenses and the gain on insurance and business interruption settlements.

(3)(2)

For 20132014 includes an $8the reversal of the $69 million accrualloss contingency related to the San Antonio Rivercenter litigation. See Legal Proceedings for further details.

N/M=Not Meaningful


 

Statement of Operations Results and Trends

For 2016 and 2015, the following items have affected the year-over-year comparability of our operations.

The results of hotels acquired or sold during the comparable periods (collectively, our “Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions”) had a significant impact on year-over-year comparisons. Our operations were affected by the sale of ten hotels in 2016, eight hotels in 2015 and five hotels in 2014. These dispositions were partially offset by the acquisition or new development of five hotels during this timeframe: The Phoenician acquired in June 2015, the Axiom Hotel Sales Overviewacquired in January 2014, the YVE Hotel Miami acquired in August 2014 and the ibis and Novotel Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico hotels, which opened in the fourth quarter of 2014. The table below presents the effects on earnings from our Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions (in millions, increase (decrease)):

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Change 2015 to 2016

 

 

2014

 

 

Change 2014 to 2015

 

Total Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

$

146

 

 

$

77

 

 

$

69

 

 

$

13

 

 

$

64

 

Dispositions

 

 

58

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

(156

)

 

 

353

 

 

 

(139

)

Total Revenues

 

$

204

 

 

$

291

 

 

$

(87

)

 

$

366

 

 

$

(75

)

Net income (excluding gain on sale):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

$

18

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

19

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

(3

)

Dispositions

 

 

10

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

27

 

 

 

(2

)

Net income (excluding gain

     on sale)

 

$

28

 

 

$

24

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

29

 

 

$

(5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In 2016, we had fewer disruptive renovations compared to 2015, which benefited the year-over-year growth in net income when compared to 2015. Additionally, in 2016, we had a full year of operations for four hotels that had been closed for portions of 2015 for redevelopment. Conversely, in 2015, our results were significantly more impacted by disruptive renovations than in 2014, which reduced growth in net income when compared to the prior year.

Our domestic hotel portfolio represents approximately 97% of our revenues and assets. However, for international properties and our international joint ventures, we are exposed to currency exchange risks in the normal course of business. We further reduced our currency exchange risk in 2016 through the disposition of six international properties. The table below presents the overall currency impact for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in millions, increases (decrease)):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016 Compared to 2015

 

 

2015 Compared to 2014

 

Total revenues

 

$

(7

)

 

$

(35

)

Net income (excluding gain on sale)

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(21

)

On January 1, 2015, our operators adopted the 11th edition of USALI, which reclassifies certain hotel-level revenue and expense items. Reclassifications include, among other items, certain service charges, all of which now are reflected on a gross basis, and group rebates, which now are reflected as a reduction to revenue. The 2014 results were not restated for these changes and therefore impact our 2015 comparative operating results. For 2015, we estimate the adoption of USALI decreased rooms revenue growth by 20 basis points, increased comparable F&B revenues growth by approximately 270 basis points, decreased other revenue growth by 10 basis points and reduced comparable hotel EBITDA margins by 15 basis points. The adoption of USALI did not impact net income, comparable hotel EBITDA, or Adjusted EBITDA.


The following table presents revenues in accordance with GAAP and includes both comparable and non-comparable hotels for the three years ended December 31, 2016 (in millions, except percentages):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

 

2011

 

 

2011 to 2012

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

3,317

 

 

$

3,082

 

 

 

7.6

%

 

$

2,849

 

 

 

8.2

%

Food and beverage

 

 

1,503

 

 

 

1,419

 

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

1,336

 

 

 

6.2

%

Other

 

 

295

 

 

 

287

 

 

 

2.8

%

 

 

279

 

 

 

2.9

%

Owned hotel revenues

 

 

5,115

 

 

 

4,788

 

 

 

6.8

%

 

 

4,464

 

 

 

7.3

%

Other revenues

 

 

51

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

(81.2

)%

 

 

250

 

 

 

8.4

%

Total revenues

 

$

5,166

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

 

2.1

%

 

$

4,714

 

 

 

7.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46


 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2015 to 2016

 

 

2014

 

 

2014 to 2015

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

3,492

 

 

$

3,465

 

 

 

0.8

%

 

$

3,452

 

 

 

0.4

%

Food and beverage

 

 

1,599

 

 

 

1,568

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

1,546

 

 

 

1.4

 

Other

 

 

339

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

6.9

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

(1.9

)

Total revenues

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

5,350

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

$

5,321

 

 

 

0.5

 

2013 Compared to 2012. During 2013,The increases in total revenues increased $107in 2016 of $80 million primarily due to increased rooms and food$29 million in 2015 were driven by increases of 2.8% and beverage (“F&B”) revenues. The 2012 amounts include $232 million3.2% in revenues for hotels leased from Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”).  These leasesour comparable properties, respectively. Total revenues were terminated on December 31, 2012.  For 2013,impacted by our owned hotel revenues, which excludenon-comparable properties that were under renovation and our Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions.  Additionally, fluctuation in currency exchange rates and the HPT leases, increased $327 million. Our 2013 revenues benefited from the resultsrelative strength of the Grand Hyatt Washington, acquiredU.S. dollar reduced the increase in July 2012total revenues by 15 basis points in 2016 and the Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach, acquired80 basis points in May 2013 (collectively, our “Recent Acquisitions”), which contributed an incremental $72 million of revenues. Revenues and expenses for eight properties sold in 2013 or 2012 have been reclassified to discontinued operations and, accordingly, are excluded from the revenues and expenses discussed in this section.2015.  

Rooms. Rooms revenues increased $235$27 million and $13 million in 2013. The improvement in rooms revenues reflects a 5.6%2016 and 2015, respectively, reflecting an increase in constant dollar RevPAR of 2.7% and 3.7%, respectively, at our comparable hotels, as well as RevPAR improvements for recently renovated properties that are not included in our comparable results. In addition,hotels. Currency fluctuations reduced year-over-year rooms revenues for 2013 increased $51growth by 15 basis points in 2016 and 90 basis points in 2015. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a net decrease of $81 million in 2016 and $49 million in 2015 due to incremental revenues from our Recent Acquisitions.Acquisitions and Dispositions.

Food and beverage. F&B revenues increased $84$31 million and $22 million in 2013.2016 and 2015, respectively. For our comparable hotels, F&B revenues increased 4.0%increased 1.7% and 5.1%, respectively, for 2013,2016 and 2015, driven by a positive mix shift to banquet, audio visual revenues and outlet revenue growth.  For 2013, the increase in F&B revenues due to our Recent Acquisitions was approximately $20 million.

Other revenues from owned hotels. During 2013, other revenues from owned hotels increased $8 million due to increases in attrition and cancellation fees and garage revenue. The increase in other revenues from owned hotels due to our Recent Acquisitions was approximately $2 million for 2013.

Other revenues. Other revenues decreased $220 million in 2013. Excluding the effects of the terminated HPT leases, other revenues increased $12 million, or 30.8%, primarily due to lease revenue at the New York Marriott Marquis as a result of the new retail lease with Vornado.

While management evaluates the performance of each individual hotel against its competitive set in a given market, overall we evaluate the portfolio operating results using three different criteria: geographic market, property type (i.e. urban, suburban, resort/conference or airport), and mix of business (i.e. transient, group or contract).

47


Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Market.

The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by geographic market as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

Comparable Hotels by Market in Constant US$(1)

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012 (2)

 

 

 

 

 

Market

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Boston

 

 

6

 

 

 

3,672

 

 

$

193.69

 

 

 

77.6

%

 

$

150.25

 

 

$

189.22

 

 

 

74.0

%

 

$

140.11

 

 

 

7.2

%

New York

 

 

8

 

 

 

6,450

 

 

 

278.42

 

 

 

86.6

 

 

 

241.20

 

 

 

272.52

 

 

 

83.5

 

 

 

227.64

 

 

 

6.0

 

Philadelphia

 

 

3

 

 

 

2,191

 

 

 

185.36

 

 

 

75.2

 

 

 

139.37

 

 

 

180.98

 

 

 

74.7

 

 

 

135.24

 

 

 

3.1

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

11

 

 

 

5,119

 

 

 

197.26

 

 

 

74.4

 

 

 

146.68

 

 

 

197.96

 

 

 

73.4

 

 

 

145.21

 

 

 

1.0

 

Atlanta

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,939

 

 

 

171.38

 

 

 

73.6

 

 

 

126.11

 

 

 

165.63

 

 

 

69.5

 

 

 

115.06

 

 

 

9.6

 

Florida

 

 

7

 

 

 

3,230

 

 

 

196.43

 

 

 

75.3

 

 

 

147.99

 

 

 

186.39

 

 

 

74.0

 

 

 

137.95

 

 

 

7.3

 

Chicago

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,387

 

 

 

191.06

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

143.52

 

 

 

184.03

 

 

 

75.5

 

 

 

138.94

 

 

 

3.3

 

Denver

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,363

 

 

 

144.17

 

 

 

63.9

 

 

 

92.18

 

 

 

138.62

 

 

 

63.6

 

 

 

88.13

 

 

 

4.6

 

Houston

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,706

 

 

 

181.26

 

 

 

76.6

 

 

 

138.75

 

 

 

157.53

 

 

 

76.5

 

 

 

120.51

 

 

 

15.1

 

Phoenix

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

188.53

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

128.65

 

 

 

180.15

 

 

 

66.9

 

 

 

120.47

 

 

 

6.8

 

Seattle

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,774

 

 

 

168.60

 

 

 

78.1

 

 

 

131.71

 

 

 

158.04

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

118.73

 

 

 

10.9

 

San Francisco

 

 

5

 

 

 

3,701

 

 

 

199.66

 

 

 

80.3

 

 

 

160.41

 

 

 

180.22

 

 

 

80.8

 

 

 

145.55

 

 

 

10.2

 

Los Angeles

 

 

8

 

 

 

3,228

 

 

 

162.93

 

 

 

81.7

 

 

 

133.11

 

 

 

152.29

 

 

 

81.1

 

 

 

123.49

 

 

 

7.8

 

San Diego

 

 

5

 

 

 

4,691

 

 

 

186.14

 

 

 

78.2

 

 

 

145.59

 

 

 

182.78

 

 

 

76.4

 

 

 

139.69

 

 

 

4.2

 

Hawaii

 

 

2

 

 

 

1,256

 

 

 

353.41

 

 

 

82.0

 

 

 

289.89

 

 

 

332.04

 

 

 

83.3

 

 

 

276.47

 

 

 

4.9

 

Other

 

 

12

 

 

 

7,532

 

 

 

155.82

 

 

 

66.8

 

 

 

104.05

 

 

 

146.87

 

 

 

68.0

 

 

 

99.90

 

 

 

4.2

 

Domestic

 

 

92

 

 

 

51,761

 

 

 

199.44

 

 

 

76.3

 

 

 

152.13

 

 

 

191.00

 

 

 

75.2

 

 

 

143.62

 

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

6

 

 

 

1,223

 

 

$

156.30

 

 

 

82.3

%

 

$

128.59

 

 

$

149.15

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

$

118.96

 

 

 

8.1

%

Canada

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

183.53

 

 

 

68.9

 

 

 

126.43

 

 

 

174.08

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

118.70

 

 

 

6.5

 

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

 

238.71

 

 

 

65.6

 

 

 

156.52

 

 

 

224.15

 

 

 

71.2

 

 

 

159.49

 

 

 

(1.9

)

International

 

 

13

 

 

 

3,517

 

 

 

187.71

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

136.31

 

 

 

179.22

 

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

131.15

 

 

 

3.9

 

All Markets - Constant US$

 

 

105

 

 

 

55,278

 

 

 

198.72

 

 

 

76.0

 

 

 

151.12

 

 

 

190.26

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

142.82

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable Hotels in Nominal US$

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012 (2)

 

 

 

 

 

International

Market

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

6

 

 

 

1,223

 

 

$

156.30

 

 

 

82.3

%

 

$

128.59

 

 

$

154.17

 

 

 

79.8

%

 

$

122.96

 

 

 

4.6

%

Canada

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

183.53

 

 

 

68.9

 

 

 

126.43

 

 

 

179.47

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

122.37

 

 

 

3.3

 

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

 

238.71

 

 

 

65.6

 

 

 

156.52

 

 

 

232.18

 

 

 

71.2

 

 

 

165.21

 

 

 

(5.3

)

International

 

 

13

 

 

 

3,517

 

 

 

187.71

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

136.31

 

 

 

185.24

 

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

135.56

 

 

 

0.6

 

Domestic

 

 

92

 

 

 

51,761

 

 

 

199.44

 

 

 

76.3

 

 

 

152.13

 

 

 

191.00

 

 

 

75.2

 

 

 

143.62

 

 

 

5.9

 

All Markets - Nominal US$

 

 

105

 

 

 

55,278

 

 

 

198.72

 

 

 

76.0

 

 

 

151.12

 

 

 

190.64

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

143.10

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For a discussion of our markets and constant US$ and nominal US$ presentation, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

(2)

The 2012 results include one additional day of operations in February compared to 2013 due to the leap year in 2012.

For 2013, our top performing markets were Houston, Seattle and San Francisco with RevPAR increases of 15.1%, 10.9% and 10.2%, respectively. The increase in our Houston market primarily resulted from higher average room rates as these hotels shifted from lower-rated group and transient business to higher-rated segments as well as aggressive pricing increases in group for both retail and special corporate business. The increase in our Seattle market reflects a 6.7% increase in average room rate and a 3.0 percentage point increase in average occupancy driven by higher-rated group and transient demand. RevPAR growth in our San Francisco market

48


was driven entirely by rate improvements from an improved business mix. Occupancy declined slightly during the year, but still remained at over 80% as strong transient and group demand throughout the city have translated to RevPAR gains at our properties.  

RevPAR for our Atlanta hotels increased 9.6% for 2013, reflecting a strong citywide and special event calendar during the year that drove group and transient demand.

For 2013, our Los Angeles market RevPAR increased 7.8% primarily due to improved average room rates as a result of increased transient business driven by a mix shift to higher-rated segments and increased corporate group business.

For 2013, our Florida hotels increased RevPAR 7.3% as a result of a 5.4% increase in average room rate and 1.3 percentage point increase in average occupancy driven by strong leisure demand.

Our Boston market RevPAR increased 7.2% as a result of a 3.5 percentage point increase in average occupancy and a 2.4% increase in average room rate due to strong group performance and transient business due in part to Major League Baseball’s Playoff and World Series events and the favorable 2012 comparisons related to hurricane Sandy.  

Our New York hotels increased RevPAR 6.0% as a result of a 3.1 percentage point increase in average occupancy and a 2.2% increase in average room rate. In 2012, RevPAR growth was negatively affected by hurricane Sandy in the fourth quarter and renovation disruption at several of our New York hotels. In 2013, RevPAR results have been tempered by supply growth in this market.

For 2013, our Washington D.C. market RevPAR increased only 1.0% due to a 1.0 percentage point increase in average occupancy resulting from transient room nights. For 2013, the sequestration and U.S. Federal Government shutdown negatively impacted this market by lowering demand for government and related industry business.

Internationally, RevPAR in our Asia/Pacific and Canadian markets increased 8.1% and 6.5%, respectively, on a constant US$ basis.  For 2013, the increase at our Asia/Pacific hotels resulted from a 4.8% increase in average room rate and a 2.5 percentage point increase in average occupancy, driven by transient demand and the results of renovations completed in 2012. The improvement in RevPAR at our Canadian hotels was primarily driven by an increase in average room rate. RevPAR at our Latin American properties decreased 1.9% on a constant US$ basis, largely due to a decrease in occupancy. The nominal RevPAR results of our international properties were negatively affected by the relative strength of the US Dollar during 2013.

Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type.

The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by property type as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

Comparable Hotels by Type in Nominal US$

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

Property type (2)

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Urban

 

 

54

 

 

 

34,183

 

 

$

212.05

 

 

 

77.8

%

 

$

164.95

 

 

$

205.15

 

 

 

76.4

%

 

$

156.81

 

 

 

5.2

%

Suburban

 

 

28

 

 

 

10,021

 

 

 

163.16

 

 

 

70.7

 

 

 

115.40

 

 

 

152.34

 

 

 

70.7

 

 

 

107.74

 

 

 

7.1

 

Resort/Conference

 

 

12

 

 

 

5,906

 

 

 

239.60

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

171.32

 

 

 

228.57

 

 

 

70.3

 

 

 

160.61

 

 

 

6.7

 

Airport

 

 

11

 

 

 

5,168

 

 

 

132.13

 

 

 

80.0

 

 

 

105.74

 

 

 

126.34

 

 

 

79.9

 

 

 

100.91

 

 

 

4.8

 

All Types

 

 

105

 

 

 

55,278

 

 

 

198.72

 

 

 

76.0

 

 

 

151.12

 

 

 

190.64

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

143.10

 

 

 

5.6

 

(1)

The 2012 results include one additional day of operations due to the leap year.

(2)

For a discussion of our property types, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

For 2013, our suburban properties led the portfolio with a 7.1% increase in RevPAR, as stable average occupancy levels at these properties have allowed operators to increase average daily room rates. We believe strong demand that has led to high average occupancy and increasing rates in adjacent urban markets has contributed to an increase in demand at our suburban properties.  For 2013, our resort/conference hotels experienced RevPAR growth of 6.7%, driven by a 4.8% increase in average room rate and a 1.2 percentage point increase in average occupancy due to higher demand.  Our urban properties experienced a RevPAR growth of 5.2% for 2013, as results were mixed throughout these markets. Strength in several of our west coast markets, as well as our Houston and Atlanta markets were partially offset by weakness in our Washington D.C. and Philadelphia markets.  

49


Hotel Sales by Business Mix.

 The majority of our customers fall into three broad categories:  transient, group and contract business. The information below is derived from business mix results from 102 comparable hotels for which 2013 and 2012 business mix information is available. In 2013, overall revenue growth was due mainly to transient revenues improving 7.5% compared to the prior year, consisting of a 4.0% average room rate increase coupled with a 3.4% growth in transient room nights sold. The transient average room rate increase resulted from a combination of segment price increases and an increasingly favorable business mix.  Higher-rated retail and non-qualified discount transient room nights increased 9.1% for the year, while lower-rated special corporate, government and discount segments decreased 0.9%. During 2013, group revenues increased 2.6% when compared to 2012, reflecting an increase in average room rate of 2.8%, while group room nights sold declined 0.2%. Corporate and association group revenues increased 9.9% and 2.6%, respectively, while discount group revenue decreased 8.4%.  

2012 Compared to 2011. During 2012, total revenue increased $345 million, or 7.3%, primarily as a result of growth in room revenues, reflecting an increase in RevPAR, and growth in F&B revenues. In addition, revenues benefited from the acquisition of one hotel in July 2012 and a full year of operations for 10 hotels acquired in 2011. Revenues for properties sold in 2012 or 2011 have been reclassified to discontinued operations.

Rooms. Room revenues increased $233 million, or 8.2%, to $3,082 million in 2012 due to strong growth in room rates coupled with a growth in average occupancy. Comparable hotel RevPAR improved 6.4% as a result of a 3.6% increase in average room rate and a 200 basis point increase in average occupancy, which is discussed in more detail below. In addition, room revenue for 2012 increased $67 million due to incremental revenues from recently acquired hotels.

Food and beverage. F&B revenues increased $83 million, or 6.2%, to $1,419 million in 2012, primarily resulting from an increase in comparable F&B revenue of 3.9%. The increase in comparable F&B revenue was driven by improvements in banquet and audio visual revenues during the first half of the year, while outlet revenue improved2.0% and 5.7% at our comparable hotels in the second half2016 and 2015, respectively. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a net decrease of the year, as new$20 million for 2016 and recently renovated restaurants performed well. In addition, F&B revenues$18 million for 2012 increased $31 million2015 due to incremental revenues from recently acquired hotels.Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions.

Other revenues from owned hotels. During 2012, other revenues from owned hotels increased $8 million, or 2.9%, to $287 million. The improvement primarily resulted from an increase in operating departments such as garage, spa and golf, partially offset by a decrease in gift shop revenue, as well as $2 million in incremental revenues from recently acquired hotels.

Other revenues. Other revenues increased $21$22 million, or 8.4%6.9%, to $271 million in 2012. The improvement was due to $5 million in retail lease revenue at the New York Marriott Marquis as a result of the new lease agreement with Vornado Realty Trust, as well as an increase of $12 million in revenues for hotels we leased from HPT.

50


Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Market.

The following table sets forth performance information for2016. For our comparable hotels, other revenues increased 7.1% primarily driven by geographic market as of December 31, 2012amenity fees revenue and 2011:

Comparable Hotels by Market in Constant US$(1)

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012 (2)

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Market

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Boston

 

 

6

 

 

 

3,672

 

 

$

189.22

 

 

 

74.0

%

 

$

140.11

 

 

$

174.35

 

 

 

72.4

%

 

$

126.19

 

 

 

11.0

%

New York

 

 

8

 

 

 

6,447

 

 

 

272.52

 

 

 

83.5

 

 

 

227.64

 

 

 

264.83

 

 

 

82.5

 

 

 

218.40

 

 

 

4.2

 

Philadelphia

 

 

3

 

 

 

2,191

 

 

 

180.98

 

 

 

74.7

 

 

 

135.24

 

 

 

179.62

 

 

 

66.1

 

 

 

118.77

 

 

 

13.9

 

Washington, D.C.

 

 

11

 

 

 

5,117

 

 

 

197.96

 

 

 

73.4

 

 

 

145.21

 

 

 

198.51

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

149.02

 

 

 

(2.6

)

Atlanta

 

 

7

 

 

 

3,846

 

 

 

160.57

 

 

 

68.1

 

 

 

109.38

 

 

 

157.31

 

 

 

65.0

 

 

 

102.32

 

 

 

6.9

 

Florida

 

 

8

 

 

 

3,680

 

 

 

210.85

 

 

 

73.7

 

 

 

155.35

 

 

 

196.88

 

 

 

71.7

 

 

 

141.11

 

 

 

10.1

 

Chicago

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,387

 

 

 

184.03

 

 

 

75.5

 

 

 

138.94

 

 

 

176.27

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

127.91

 

 

 

8.6

 

Denver

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,363

 

 

 

138.62

 

 

 

63.6

 

 

 

88.13

 

 

 

136.60

 

 

 

61.8

 

 

 

84.38

 

 

 

4.4

 

Houston

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,706

 

 

 

157.53

 

 

 

76.5

 

 

 

120.51

 

 

 

153.34

 

 

 

71.1

 

 

 

109.08

 

 

 

10.5

 

Phoenix

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

180.15

 

 

 

66.9

 

 

 

120.47

 

 

 

175.21

 

 

 

67.8

 

 

 

118.83

 

 

 

1.4

 

Seattle

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,774

 

 

 

158.04

 

 

 

75.1

 

 

 

118.73

 

 

 

151.89

 

 

 

73.1

 

 

 

111.06

 

 

 

6.9

 

San Francisco

 

 

6

 

 

 

4,036

 

 

 

194.58

 

 

 

80.6

 

 

 

156.77

 

 

 

180.83

 

 

 

78.4

 

 

 

141.86

 

 

 

10.5

 

Los Angeles

 

 

8

 

 

 

3,228

 

 

 

152.29

 

 

 

81.1

 

 

 

123.49

 

 

 

144.64

 

 

 

77.9

 

 

 

112.70

 

 

 

9.6

 

San Diego

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,703

 

 

 

145.49

 

 

 

78.8

 

 

 

114.60

 

 

 

144.90

 

 

 

76.9

 

 

 

111.41

 

 

 

2.9

 

Hawaii

 

 

2

 

 

 

1,256

 

 

 

332.04

 

 

 

83.3

 

 

 

276.47

 

 

 

318.87

 

 

 

78.7

 

 

 

251.06

 

 

 

10.1

 

Other

 

 

14

 

 

 

8,582

 

 

 

144.02

 

 

 

67.8

 

 

 

97.61

 

 

 

140.66

 

 

 

66.5

 

 

 

93.56

 

 

 

4.3

 

Domestic

 

 

96

 

 

 

52,510

 

 

 

190.60

 

 

 

74.7

 

 

 

142.37

 

 

 

184.10

 

 

 

72.8

 

 

 

133.95

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

$

179.47

 

 

 

68.2

%

 

$

122.37

 

 

$

174.73

 

 

 

67.5

%

 

$

117.97

 

 

 

3.7

%

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

 

232.18

 

 

 

71.2

 

 

 

165.21

 

 

 

199.18

 

 

 

67.8

 

 

 

135.10

 

 

 

22.3

 

International

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,294

 

 

 

204.73

 

 

 

69.6

 

 

 

142.45

 

 

 

186.23

 

 

 

67.7

 

 

 

126.00

 

 

 

13.0

 

All Markets -  Constant US$

 

 

103

 

 

 

54,804

 

 

 

191.15

 

 

 

74.5

 

 

 

142.37

 

 

 

184.19

 

 

 

72.5

 

 

 

133.62

 

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable Hotels in Nominal US$

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012 (2)

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

International

Market

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Canada

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

$

179.47

 

 

 

68.2

%

 

$

122.37

 

 

$

177.23

 

 

 

67.5

%

 

$

119.66

 

 

 

2.3

%

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,075

 

 

 

232.18

 

 

 

71.2

 

 

 

165.21

 

 

 

214.79

 

 

 

67.8

 

 

 

145.69

 

 

 

13.4

 

International

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,294

 

 

 

204.73

 

 

 

69.6

 

 

 

142.45

 

 

 

194.90

 

 

 

67.7

 

 

 

131.87

 

 

 

8.0

 

Domestic

 

 

96

 

 

 

52,510

 

 

 

190.60

 

 

 

74.7

 

 

 

142.37

 

 

 

184.10

 

 

 

72.8

 

 

 

133.95

 

 

 

6.3

 

All Markets - Nominal US$

 

 

103

 

 

 

54,804

 

 

 

191.15

 

 

 

74.5

 

 

 

142.37

 

 

 

184.52

 

 

 

72.5

 

 

 

133.86

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For a discussion of our markets and constant US$ and nominal US$ presentation, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

(2)

The 2012 results include one additional day of operations due to the leap year.

During 2012, several markets experienced double digit RevPAR growth.  For our domestic properties, our Philadelphia market led the portfolio with a RevPAR increase of 13.9% as the properties benefited from the completion of recent renovations.  The renovations were on-going in 2011, which contributed to the year-over-year RevPAR improvements.  That market was followed by our Boston market, with a RevPAR increase of 11.0%,attrition and cancellation fees. In 2015, other revenues decreased $6 million, primarily due to strong group demand, which resulted inlower guest room telephone, internet, and spa and fitness center revenue, partially offset by an increase in average room rate of 8.5%attrition and average occupancy of 1.7 percentage points.cancellation fees.

51


The Florida market had an increase in RevPAR of 10.1% due to a strong performance at our resort properties, which benefited from the completion of several renovations, leading to improvements in average room rates of 7.1% and average occupancy of 2.0 percentage points.

RevPAR at our San Francisco and Los Angeles hotels grew 10.5% and 9.6%, respectively.  The growth in our San Francisco hotels resulted from an increase in average room rates of 7.6% and average occupancy of 2.1 percentage points while average room rates and occupancy increased 5.3% and 3.2 percentage points, respectively, at our San Francisco hotels.

Our Chicago market had an increase in RevPAR of 8.6%, as a result of strong improvements in both group and transient demand. The Atlanta market had an increase in RevPAR of 6.9%, resulting from strong transient demand, which led to an increase in average room rates of 2.1% and average occupancy of 3.1 percentage points.

Lower levels of demand in our New York market resulted in a RevPAR increase of only 4.2% due to cancellations related to Hurricane Sandy, including the closure of three hotels, one of which was closed for 15 days. RevPAR in our Washington D.C. market declined by 2.6% during the year, as average room rate decreased slightly and average occupancy decreased 1.7 percentage points.  The decline was due to weak transient business, as well as cancellations related to Hurricane Sandy and renovations at three of the hotels.

Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type.

The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by property type as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Comparable Hotels by Type in Nominal US$

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012 (1)

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Property type (2)

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Urban

 

 

53

 

 

 

33,232

 

 

$

203.62

 

 

 

75.9

%

 

$

154.54

 

 

$

197.61

 

 

 

74.0

%

 

$

146.30

 

 

 

5.6

%

Suburban

 

 

27

 

 

 

10,321

 

 

 

151.84

 

 

 

69.9

 

 

 

106.08

 

 

 

146.16

 

 

 

68.1

 

 

 

99.59

 

 

 

6.5

 

Resort/Conference

 

 

12

 

 

 

6,083

 

 

 

246.69

 

 

 

70.0

 

 

 

172.76

 

 

 

234.20

 

 

 

67.9

 

 

 

159.09

 

 

 

8.6

 

Airport

 

 

11

 

 

 

5,168

 

 

 

126.34

 

 

 

79.9

 

 

 

100.91

 

 

 

119.95

 

 

 

77.2

 

 

 

92.62

 

 

 

9.0

 

All Types

 

 

103

 

 

 

54,804

 

 

 

191.15

 

 

 

74.5

 

 

 

142.37

 

 

 

184.52

 

 

 

72.5

 

 

 

133.86

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The 2012 results include one additional day of operations due to the leap year.

(2)

For a discussion of our property types, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

During 2012, comparable hotel RevPAR increased across all of our hotel property types. Our Airport properties led the portfolio with a 9.0% increase for the year, driven by an improvement in average room rates of 5.3%, as well as strength at our San Francisco, Chicago, Houston and Tampa airport hotels. Our resort/conference hotels also experienced a significant RevPAR increase of 8.6%, led by our Florida and Hawaii properties. Our urban hotels slightly underperformed the portfolio due to renovation activity during the year and the effects of Hurricane Sandy in the fourth quarter.

Hotel Sales by Business Mix. 

The information below is derived from business mix data for 103 of our hotels for which 2012 and 2011 business mix information is available. In 2012, overall transient revenues increased 5.9% when compared to 2011, reflecting a 4.2% improvement in average room rate and a 1.6% increase in room nights. During 2012, group revenues increased approximately 6.4% when compared to 2011, reflecting a 2.3% increase in average room rate and a 4.1% increase in room nights. The improvement was due to strong performance in both association and corporate business.

52


Property-level Operating Expenses

The following table presents consolidated property-level operating expenses in accordance with GAAP and includes both comparable and non-comparable hotels for the three years ended December 31, 2016 (in millions, except percentages):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

 

2011

 

 

2011 to 2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2015 to 2016

 

 

2014

 

 

2014 to 2015

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

894

 

 

$

836

 

 

 

6.9

%

 

$

780

 

 

 

7.2

%

 

$

893

 

 

$

902

 

 

 

(1.0

)%

 

$

924

 

 

 

(2.4

)%

Food and beverage

 

 

1,095

 

 

 

1,049

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

993

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

1,114

 

 

 

1,110

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

1,109

 

 

 

0.1

 

Other departmental and support expenses

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

1,179

 

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

1,306

 

 

 

1,295

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

1,264

 

 

 

2.5

 

Management fees

 

 

222

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

11.6

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

226

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

227

 

 

 

(0.4

)

Other property-level expenses

 

 

376

 

 

 

576

 

 

 

(34.7

)

 

 

554

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

382

 

 

 

386

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

377

 

 

 

2.4

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

697

 

 

 

722

 

 

 

(3.5

)

 

 

609

 

 

 

18.6

 

 

 

724

 

 

 

708

 

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

693

 

 

 

2.2

 

Total property-level operating expenses

 

$

4,533

 

 

$

4,601

 

 

 

(1.5

)%

 

$

4,296

 

 

 

7.1

%

 

$

4,655

 

 

$

4,627

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

$

4,594

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 compared to 2012 and 2012 compared to 2011. Our operating costs and expenses, which consist of both fixed and variable components, are affected by a number of factors. As previously discussed, roomRooms expense is affected mainly by occupancy, which drives costs related to items such as housekeeping, reservationreservation systems, room supplies, laundry services and front desk costs. Food and beverage expense correlatesexpenses correlate closely with food and beverage revenues, and is affected by occupancy and the mix of business between banquet and audio-visual and outlet sales. However, the most significant expense for both room expense and food and beverage expense is related to wages and employee benefits, which comprise approximately 55%56% of these expenses in any year. Other property-level expenses consist of property taxes, which are highly dependent on local taxing authorities, and property and general liability insurance, and do not necessarily change based on changes in revenues at our hotels. The overall increases in operating expenses in 2013 and 2012 are consistent with higher overall revenues at our properties.  The year-over-year increases also reflect the incremental expenses from our recently acquired properties.  For 2013, the recently acquired properties include the Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach that was purchased in May 2013 and six months of incremental operations for the Grand Hyatt Washington.  For 2012, the recently acquired properties include the Grand Hyatt Washington that was purchased in July 2012 and a full year of operations for 10 hotels acquired in 2011.  Property-level operating expenses for hotels sold during the periods presented have been reclassified as discontinued operations.


Rooms. Room expenses increased $58Rooms expense decreased $9 million during 2013,2016 and $22 million in 2015, reflecting an increasethe effect of 5.1%Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions. Rooms expense at our comparable hotels primarilyproperties increased 1.4% in 2016 driven by higherby increases in wages, benefits and group travel agent commissionscommissions.  In 2015, rooms expense at our comparable properties was flat, as improvements in hourly productivity offset wage rate growth of 2.4%. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a net decrease of $23 million in 2016 and wages and benefit expenses. Additionally, rooms expenses increased $12$13 million for 2013in 2015 due to incremental expenses from our Recent Acquisitions.  Acquisitions and Dispositions.

Food and beverage. The increase in roomF&B expenses for 2012 reflects an increase of 5.5% at our$4 million in 2016 and $1 million in 2015 reflect year-over-year increases of 0.3% and 3.1% in comparable hotelsF&B expenses, respectively. Overall, F&B hourly productivity was improved, which has led to declines in F&B costs as a resultpercentage of higher average occupancy, as well as higher wage ratesrevenues in 2016 and benefits. Rooms expenses for 2012 increased an incremental $19 million as a result of acquired hotels.

Food and beverage. F&B expenses increased $46 million during 2013. Comparable F&B expenses increased just 2.7%, as2015. Additionally, much of the revenue improvement wasimprovements were driven by increases in banquet and audio visual revenues, which have higher overall operatingoperating margins than outlet revenue. AsYear-over-year comparisons also reflect a percentagenet decrease of revenues, F&B expenses decreased 100 basis points for our comparable hotels during 2013. F&B expenses also increased an incremental $13$18 million in 2016 and $12 million in 2015 due to our Recent Acquisitions.  Acquisitions and Dispositions.

The increase in F&B expenses for 2012 was a result of a 3.6% increase at our comparable hotels, reflecting higher wages and benefits, partially offset by a slight improvement in productivity. F&B expenses for 2012 also increased an incremental $21 million as a result of acquired hotels.

Other departmental and support expenses. Other departmental and support expenses increased $30$11 million and $31 million in 2013,2016 and 2015, respectively. For 2016, the increase primarily reflects increases in hourly wages and loyalty and reward program expenses, offset by a 6.4% decrease in administrative and general costs and an 8.1% decrease in utilities expense. The increase in 2015 primarily reflects growth in non-controllable expenses, including credit card fees and loyalty and reward programs. Year-over-year comparisons also reflect a net decrease of $25 million in 2016 and $13 million in 2015 due to increases in loyalty program rewards, wagesRecent Acquisitions and benefits, and credit card expenses.  Other departmental and support expenses for 2013 also included an incremental $13 million from our Recent Acquisitions.  For 2012 the increase in these expenses was driven primarily by higher sales and marketing expenses, which are variable and dependent upon revenues, such as loyalty rewards expense and national sales allocations. These increases partially were offset by lower centralized accounting charges and lower utility rates and consumption. For 2012, acquired hotels also increased other departmental and support expenses by an incremental $24 million.Dispositions.

53


Management fees. Management fees, which generally are calculated as a percentage of revenues and operating profit, increased 11.6% to $222 million4.4% for 2013. Base2016 and decreased 0.4% for 2015. At our comparable hotels, base management fees,, which are calculated as a percentage of total revenues, increased $11 million1.0% in 2013. Incentive management fees, which are calculated based on operating profit after our preferred return, increased $18 million for the year. Management fees increased $5 million for 2013 due to incremental expenses from our Recent Acquisitions. For 2012, base management fees increased 6.7% to $158 million2016 and 0.2% in 2015, and incentive management fees increased 29.6% to $48 million. Our14.8% in 2016 and 12.1% in 2015. The increase in both base and incentive management fees increased an incremental $4at our comparable hotels reflects the improvements in hotel operations. Year-over-year comparisons also include a net decrease of $6 million in 2012 as a result of acquired hotels.2016 and $3 million in 2015 from Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions.

Other property-level expenses. These expenses generally do not vary significantly based on occupancy and include expenses such as property taxes and insurance. Other property-level expenses decreased $200$4 million, or 34.7%1.0%, due to the expiration of the HPT leases on December 31, 2012. Excluding the effects of the HPT leases, otherin 2016, and increased $9 million, or 2.4%, in 2015. Other property-level expenses at our comparable hotels increased $34 million, or 10%, in 2013 due to2.1% and 3.5% for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Both reflect an increase in real estate taxes, as well as $5 million due to incremental expenses from our Recent Acquisitions. For 2012, expenses increased $22 million, or 4.0%, due mainly to increases in property taxes and expenses related to hotels leased from HPT, as well as the inclusion of expenses from recently acquired hotels.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $25 million, or 3.5%, to $697 million in 2013. The decrease is due toground rent, partially offset by a decline in non-cash impairmentutilities and insurance expense, while the year-over-year changes for total other property-level expenses also reflect a net decrease of $59$6 million in 2016 and $2 million in 2015 from our Recent Acquisitions and Dispositions.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $16 million, or 2.3%, to $724 million in 2016 and increased $15 million, or 2.2%, to $708 million in 2015. The increases in depreciation and amortization expense reflect the depreciation of our recent capital expenditures, partially offset by an increasea decrease due to Recent Acquisitions and capital expenditures. For 2012, depreciation and amortization expense increased $113 million, or 18.6% to $722 million, which includes a $60 million non-cash impairment charge related to The Westin Mission Hills Resort & Spa. The increase in 2012 also reflects the inclusion of depreciation expense for newly acquired properties and recent capital expenditures.Dispositions.

Other Income and Expense

Corporate and other expenses. Corporate and other expenses include the following items (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

General and administrative costs

 

$

95

 

 

$

87

 

 

$

82

 

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense

 

 

12

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

22

 

Litigation (recoveries)/accruals and acquisition costs, net

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(61

)

       Total

 

$

106

 

 

$

94

 

 

$

43

 

General and administrative costs primarily consist of wages and benefits, employee stock-based compensation expense, travel, corporate insurance, legal fees, acquisition-related costs, audit fees, building rent and systems costs. CorporateThe 2016 corporate and other expenses increasedinclude approximately $14$10 million of severance costs to be paid to our prior chief executive officer. For 2015, corporate expenses, excluding litigation (recoveries) accruals and acquisition costs, decreased 6% or 13.1% in 2013, due to higher compensation expenses and legal costs, including$6 million, as 2014 included a $69 million reversal of a loss contingency upon the successful resolution of the litigation accruals of $13 million, which partially were offset by lower acquisition costs.

Corporate expenses decreased approximately $4 million, or 3.6%, in 2012.  Corporate expenses in 2011 include a charge of $15 million related to the ground lease for the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter. Additionally, the decrease in the non-cash stock-based compensation expense in 2015 reflects the decline in our stock price and a forfeited acquisition deposit. During 2012, non-recurrencedecline in the number of this expense was partially offset by increases in acquisition and compensation expenses.  shares earned.  

Gain on insurance and business interruption settlements. We recorded gains of $9received $12 million and $2 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the receipt of business interruption insurance proceeds in 2016 from a facility funded by BP for two properties in Christchurch,the disruption of operations at the New Zealand, both of which were affectedOrleans Marriott caused by an earthquake in February 2011.the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. In 2012,2015, we also recorded a gain of $2 million for the receipt of the final settlement related to property insurance for two hotels in Chile, both of which were affected by anthe earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand in February 2010. For further information on our insurance settlements, see Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Settlements – Gain on Insurance Settlements.2011.


Interest income. Interest income in 2013 decreased approximately $19 million due to the 2012 maturity of the mortgage loan investment associated with the portfolio of five hotels acquired by the Euro JV in November 2012. For 2012 and 2011, interest income primarily was attributable to amounts earned on this mortgage of $20 million and $17 million, respectively.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $69$73 million, or 18.5%32.2%, in 20132016 as compared to 2015, due to the repayment or refinancingreduction of debt that resultedextinguishment costs as well as a reduction in a decrease in our weighted average interest rates andthe overall debt balance. Total debt extinguishment costs increased $6 million in 2013. Interest expense increased $2$20 million, or 0.5%9.7%, in 2012. The increase is2015, due primarily to a $21$37 million increase in debt extinguishment costs, which was partially offset by a lowerthe decline in our weighted average interest rate and overall debt balances. In addition, savings from our fixed-to-floating interest rate swap reduced interest expense by $7 million in 2013 and $6 million for each of 2012 and 2011.rate. The following table presents certain components of interest expense (in millions):

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, (1

)

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Cash interest expense(1)

 

$

 

239

 

 

$

308

 

 

$

318

 

Cash incremental interest expense (1)(2)

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

��

 

1

 

Non-cash interest expense

 

 

25

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

43

 

Cash debt extinguishment costs(1)

 

 

23

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

5

 

Non-cash debt extinguishment costs

 

 

13

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

4

 

Total interest expense

 

$

 

304

 

 

$

373

 

 

$

371

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Cash interest expense(1)

 

$

147

 

 

$

161

 

 

$

179

 

Cash incremental interest expense (1)(2)

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Non-cash interest expense

 

 

7

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

24

 

Cash debt extinguishment costs(1)

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

2

 

Non-cash debt extinguishment costs

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

2

 

Total interest expense

 

$

154

 

 

$

227

 

 

$

207

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Total cash interest expense paid was $282$144 million, $338$207 million, and $320$182 million in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, which includes an increase (decrease) due to the change in accrued interest of $16$(3) million, $4$12 million and $(4)$1 million for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

54


(2)

Incremental interest expense reflects the cash interest expense for refinanced debt subsequent to the issuance of the new financing and prior to the repayment of the refinanced debt.

Gain on sale of assets.Net The following table presents the gains on property transactions and other. Net gains on property transactions increased $20 million in 2013 due to the $21 million gainrecognized on the sale of land adjacentassets (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

San Diego Marriott Mission Valley

 

$

47

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Manhattan Beach Marriott

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center and

     San Cristobal Tower, Chile

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seattle Airport Marriott

 

 

69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Four hotels in New Zealand

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Delta Meadowvale Hotel & Conference Centre

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Sheraton Needham

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

Park Ridge Marriott and Chicago Marriott O'Hare

 

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

 

Kansas City Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

Three hotels in New Zealand

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

89% interest in the Philadelphia Downtown Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

111

 

Greensboro High-Point Marriott Airport

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & Marina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

115

 

The Ritz-Carlton San Francisco (1)

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

Maui Timeshare land (2)

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

Other

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

$

253

 

 

$

95

 

 

$

236

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Represents the recognition of previously deferred gains related to the 2012 sale of The Ritz-Carlton San Francisco.

(2)

Represents amortization of the previously deferred gain related to the land contributed to the Maui JV.  

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates.  Equity in earnings of affiliates primarily reflects our interest in the operations of the Euro JV and our domestic joint ventures owning three hotels and a vacation ownership project. Upon adoption of ASU No. 2015-02, Amendments to our Newportthe Consolidation Analysis on January 1, 2016, the results of the Fort Lauderdale Marriott Harbor Beach Marriott HotelResort & Spa no longer are consolidated and a deferred $11 millionnow are included in equity in earnings of affiliates. We applied the standard retrospectively. For additional information see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” The decrease in equity in earnings of affiliates in 2016 and the increase in 2015 primarily reflects the gain related to an eminent domain claimon sale of nine properties in 2015 by the State of Georgia of 2.9 acres of land for the highway expansion at the Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center.Euro JV. The increase in 2012 was due to the $8 million gain related to the saleequity in earnings in 2015 also reflects an increase in sales of land totimeshare units by the Maui JV, compared to a $2 million gain recorded in 2011 forpartially offset by the transfereffect of the Le Méridien Piccadilly tostrengthening of the Euro JV.U.S. dollar on our international joint venture operations.  

Benefit (provision) for income taxes. We lease substantially all of our properties to consolidated subsidiaries designated as TRS for federal income tax purposes. The difference between hotel-level operating cash flow andand the aggregate rent paid to Host L.P. by the TRS represents taxable income or loss, on which we record an income tax provision or benefit. The decrease in the tax provision in 20132016


primarily relates to domestic and foreign corporate income taxes on hotel operations and $9 million for capital gain tax on the sale of our two properties in Chile.  The decrease in 2015 from the prior year reflects a decrease in taxable income at the TRS due to an increase in rent expense in excess of the increase in operating profit from the hotels and a reduction of certain foreign taxes, whiletaxes.

Comparable Hotel Sales Overview

While management evaluates the performance of each individual hotel against its competitive set in a given market, we evaluate our overall portfolio operating results using three different criteria: geographic market, property type (i.e. urban, suburban, resort/conference or airport), and mix of business (i.e. transient, group or contract). As of December 31, 2016, 88 of our 96 owned hotels have been classified as comparable hotels. See “Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics” for a complete description of our comparable hotels.

2016 Compared to 2015

Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Market.

The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by geographic market as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

Comparable Hotels by Market in Constant US$(1)

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Market

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Boston

 

 

4

 

 

 

3,185

 

 

$

231.16

 

 

 

80.2

%

 

$

185.42

 

 

$

228.47

 

 

 

79.6

%

 

$

181.85

 

 

 

2.0

%

New York

 

 

8

 

 

 

6,960

 

 

 

280.29

 

 

 

87.2

 

 

 

244.36

 

 

 

291.61

 

 

 

86.4

 

 

 

251.95

 

 

 

(3.0

)

Washington, D.C.

 

 

12

 

 

 

6,023

 

 

 

212.11

 

 

 

78.0

 

 

 

165.53

 

 

 

205.52

 

 

 

75.5

 

 

 

155.16

 

 

 

6.7

 

Atlanta

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,939

 

 

 

193.33

 

 

 

78.0

 

 

 

150.86

 

 

 

189.83

 

 

 

75.7

 

 

 

143.73

 

 

 

5.0

 

Florida

 

 

8

 

 

 

4,559

 

 

 

228.28

 

 

 

73.3

 

 

 

167.41

 

 

 

226.52

 

 

 

74.5

 

 

 

168.84

 

 

 

(0.8

)

Chicago

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,392

 

 

 

203.33

 

 

 

77.4

 

 

 

157.43

 

 

 

202.05

 

 

 

75.7

 

 

 

152.87

 

 

 

3.0

 

Denver

 

 

2

 

 

 

735

 

 

 

179.94

 

 

 

73.5

 

 

 

132.25

 

 

 

175.63

 

 

 

72.8

 

 

 

127.88

 

 

 

3.4

 

Houston

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,143

 

 

 

196.50

 

 

 

71.3

 

 

 

140.14

 

 

 

204.14

 

 

 

69.4

 

 

 

141.65

 

 

 

(1.1

)

Phoenix

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,241

 

 

 

215.97

 

 

 

71.1

 

 

 

153.51

 

 

 

210.15

 

 

 

71.1

 

 

 

149.42

 

 

 

2.7

 

Seattle

 

 

2

 

 

 

1,315

 

 

 

221.43

 

 

 

78.7

 

 

 

174.27

 

 

 

216.74

 

 

 

80.7

 

 

 

174.96

 

 

 

(0.4

)

San Francisco

 

 

4

 

 

 

2,912

 

 

 

261.08

 

 

 

83.2

 

 

 

217.23

 

 

 

253.52

 

 

 

83.2

 

 

 

210.81

 

 

 

3.0

 

Los Angeles

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,843

 

 

 

202.53

 

 

 

83.1

 

 

 

168.24

 

 

 

191.74

 

 

 

80.7

 

 

 

154.70

 

 

 

8.8

 

San Diego

 

 

3

 

 

 

2,981

 

 

 

206.98

 

 

 

84.2

 

 

 

174.35

 

 

 

201.70

 

 

 

82.0

 

 

 

165.31

 

 

 

5.5

 

Hawaii

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,682

 

 

 

330.98

 

 

 

90.6

 

 

 

299.86

 

 

 

323.10

 

 

 

88.7

 

 

 

286.48

 

 

 

4.7

 

Other

 

 

11

 

 

 

7,270

 

 

 

173.57

 

 

 

70.8

 

 

 

122.96

 

 

 

168.97

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

115.19

 

 

 

6.7

 

Domestic

 

 

81

 

 

 

47,180

 

 

 

226.07

 

 

 

79.0

 

 

 

178.61

 

 

 

224.23

 

 

 

77.7

 

 

 

174.18

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

1

 

 

 

384

 

 

$

210.27

 

 

 

89.6

%

 

$

188.39

 

 

$

211.25

 

 

 

89.5

%

 

$

189.09

 

 

 

(0.4

)%

Canada

 

 

2

 

 

 

849

 

 

 

170.79

 

 

 

64.0

 

 

 

109.29

 

 

 

171.84

 

 

 

60.5

 

 

 

103.98

 

 

 

5.1

 

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

963

 

 

 

217.01

 

 

 

63.8

 

 

 

138.35

 

 

 

188.71

 

 

 

63.6

 

 

 

120.06

 

 

 

15.2

 

International

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,196

 

 

 

198.82

 

 

 

68.5

 

 

 

136.15

 

 

 

188.26

 

 

 

67.1

 

 

 

126.27

 

 

 

7.8

 

All Markets -

Constant US$

 

 

88

 

 

 

49,376

 

 

 

225.01

 

 

 

78.5

 

 

 

176.71

 

 

 

222.83

 

 

 

77.2

 

 

 

172.04

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable Hotels in Nominal US$

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

1

 

 

 

384

 

 

$

210.27

 

 

 

89.6

%

 

$

188.39

 

 

$

213.04

 

 

 

89.5

%

 

$

190.69

 

 

 

(1.2

)%

Canada

 

 

2

 

 

 

849

 

 

 

170.79

 

 

 

64.0

 

 

 

109.29

 

 

 

177.16

 

 

 

60.5

 

 

 

107.20

 

 

 

1.9

 

Latin America

 

 

4

 

 

 

963

 

 

 

217.01

 

 

 

63.8

 

 

 

138.35

 

 

 

206.48

 

 

 

63.6

 

 

 

131.37

 

 

 

5.3

 

International

 

 

7

 

 

 

2,196

 

 

 

198.82

 

 

 

68.5

 

 

 

136.15

 

 

 

197.89

 

 

 

67.1

 

 

 

132.73

 

 

 

2.6

 

Domestic

 

 

81

 

 

 

47,180

 

 

 

226.07

 

 

 

79.0

 

 

 

178.61

 

 

 

224.23

 

 

 

77.7

 

 

 

174.18

 

 

 

2.5

 

All Markets

 

 

88

 

 

 

49,376

 

 

 

225.01

 

 

 

78.5

 

 

 

176.71

 

 

 

223.21

 

 

 

77.2

 

 

 

172.33

 

 

 

2.5

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For a discussion of our markets and constant US$ and nominal US$ presentation, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”


Our top performing domestic markets for the year were Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Our Los Angeles properties led our domestic portfolio with an overall RevPAR increase of 8.8%, primarily due to rate growth of 5.6%, as strong group demand enabled our operators to drive rate growth. Our Washington, D.C. market benefited year over year from the 2015 renovations and strong citywide group demand, resulting in rate growth of 3.2% combined with a 250 basis point increase in 2012 reflects year-over-year improvementsoccupancy.

Many of our other west coast markets also outperformed the portfolio, including San Diego, Hawaii and San Francisco. The MLB All-Star game and Comic-Con led to an increase in property operations recognizedcity-wide room nights and strong group business at our San Diego properties. At our Hawaiian properties, strong group and transient demand in the market due to a combination of the Zika virus threat in the Caribbean and South America, terrorism concerns in Europe and lower airfare prices all led to RevPAR growth of 4.7%. RevPAR growth at our properties in San Francisco was due solely to rate growth of 3.0%, primarily due to Super Bowl demand earlier this year, while occupancy remained flat as many of our properties were negatively impacted by the construction at the Moscone Convention Center (which will continue until 2018). The Phoenix market was in line with our TRS,portfolio as average rate increased 2.8% and occupancy remained flat. Meanwhile, in Seattle, RevPAR was affected negatively by rooms renovation at the W Seattle where occupancy declined by 840 basis points, and difficult comparisons to 2015 when the city hosted the U.S. Golf Association Open Championship.

In the southern and central U.S., our Atlanta, Chicago and Denver markets outperformed our portfolio due to a combination of rate improvement and an increase in occupancy. In Atlanta and Denver, our properties benefited from a number of citywide events during the year, while our Chicago properties benefited from completed renovations and strong group demand. Meanwhile, RevPAR at our Florida and Houston hotels underperformed our portfolio. Concerns over the spread of the Zika virus contributed to declines in both group and leisure travel at our Florida properties. Our Houston properties continued to be affected by disruption in the oil markets and increasing market supply.

On the east coast, our Boston and New York hotels underperformed our portfolio. In Boston, there were fewer citywide events, with weakening demand from the financial services and pharmaceutical sectors. In New York, supply growth has continued to negatively impact our hotels, as well as increasesthe strong U.S. dollar, resulting in certain foreign taxes.a decline in European travel, trends we expect to continue into 2017.

Income (loss) from discontinued operations. Discontinued operations consistOn a constant dollar basis, our international markets experienced RevPAR growth of five hotels disposed7.8%, led by our Latin American properties with double digit RevPAR growth of 15.2% due to the 2016 Olympics and Paralympics in 2013, three hotels disposed of in 2012 and one hotel disposed of in 2011 and represents the results of operationsBrazil and the gains or losses on the disposition of these hotels during the indicated periods. Formula 1 and NFL events in Mexico.

Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type.

The following table summarizessets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by property type as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

Comparable Hotels by Type in Nominal US$

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Property type (1)

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Urban

 

 

52

 

 

 

32,655

 

 

$

227.71

 

 

 

80.4

%

 

$

182.97

 

 

$

227.69

 

 

 

79.0

%

 

$

179.76

 

 

 

1.8

%

Suburban

 

 

19

 

 

 

6,947

 

 

 

195.55

 

 

 

73.2

 

 

 

143.18

 

 

 

189.12

 

 

 

72.1

 

 

 

136.35

 

 

 

5.0

 

Resort

 

 

11

 

 

 

7,102

 

 

 

269.97

 

 

 

72.7

 

 

 

196.32

 

 

 

263.97

 

 

 

72.3

 

 

 

190.79

 

 

 

2.9

 

Airport

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,672

 

 

 

158.03

 

 

 

85.5

 

 

 

135.14

 

 

 

153.18

 

 

 

82.3

 

 

 

126.01

 

 

 

7.2

 

All Types

 

 

88

 

 

 

49,376

 

 

 

225.01

 

 

 

78.5

 

 

 

176.71

 

 

 

223.21

 

 

 

77.2

 

 

 

172.33

 

 

 

2.5

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For a discussion of our property types, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

Our airport properties led the portfolio for the year, driven by a combination of strong rate growth of 3.2% and an increase in occupancy of 330 basis points. In particular, the Newark Airport had an increase in occupancy of 13.9 percentage points due to lower occupancy in 2015 when the hotel was completing renovations, and Westin Los Angeles Airport had rate growth of 11.8% due to new crew business. Our suburban properties also outperformed the portfolio driven by rate growth of 3.4%, as high occupancy levels in urban markets helped drive demand toward adjacent suburban markets. Improvements in occupancy at our urban properties resulted in RevPAR growth of 1.8%, while average rate remained flat. Our resort properties outperformed the portfolio with rate growth of 2.3% and a slight increase in occupancy of 40 basis points, driven by our California and Hawaii resorts.


Hotel Sales by Business Mix.

Our customers fall into three broad categories:  transient, group and contract business. The information below is derived from business mix results from 88 comparable hotels for which 2016 and 2015 business mix information is available. In 2016, overall revenue growth was due to both group and transient growth. Overall, group revenues income before taxes,improved 4.5% compared to the prior year, consisting of a 2.4% average room rate increase coupled with a 2.1% growth in group room nights sold. Our hotels were able to drive group business through higher-rated association business, which led to a 7.5% increase in revenue. Corporate group revenue increased 5.8% while government and leisure group declined 2.9%. Revenue from our transient business increased 1.2%, reflecting an increase of 0.7% in average rate and 0.5% in room nights sold. Special corporate rooms declined 3.6%, as weakness in corporate business travel resulted in a negative mix shift, as operators replaced higher rated corporate business with lower rated business, such as contract, discount or government.  


2015 Compared to 2014

Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Market.

As of December 31, 2015, 95 of our 106 owned hotels were classified as comparable hotels. See “Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics” for a complete description of our comparable hotels. The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by geographic market as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Comparable Hotels by Market in Constant US$(1)

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

Market

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Boston

 

 

4

 

 

 

3,185

 

 

$

228.47

 

 

 

79.6

%

 

$

181.85

 

 

$

218.31

 

 

 

77.4

%

 

$

168.89

 

 

 

7.7

%

New York

 

 

8

 

 

 

6,960

 

 

 

291.61

 

 

 

86.4

 

 

 

251.95

 

 

 

292.10

 

 

 

87.7

 

 

 

256.27

 

 

 

(1.7

)

Washington, D.C.

 

 

12

 

 

 

6,023

 

 

 

205.52

 

 

 

75.5

 

 

 

155.16

 

 

 

201.94

 

 

 

76.7

 

 

 

154.96

 

 

 

0.1

 

Atlanta

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,280

 

 

 

183.13

 

 

 

75.3

 

 

 

137.82

 

 

 

172.85

 

 

 

73.9

 

 

 

127.82

 

 

 

7.8

 

Florida

 

 

7

 

 

 

4,315

 

 

 

232.30

 

 

 

73.9

 

 

 

171.58

 

 

 

219.44

 

 

 

73.0

 

 

 

160.18

 

 

 

7.1

 

Chicago

 

 

6

 

 

 

2,392

 

 

 

202.05

 

 

 

75.7

 

 

 

152.87

 

 

 

194.78

 

 

 

75.0

 

 

 

146.17

 

 

 

4.6

 

Denver

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,340

 

 

 

158.75

 

 

 

67.4

 

 

 

106.92

 

 

 

152.42

 

 

 

67.3

 

 

 

102.54

 

 

 

4.3

 

Houston

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,142

 

 

 

204.14

 

 

 

69.4

 

 

 

141.65

 

 

 

223.38

 

 

 

68.5

 

 

 

153.01

 

 

 

(7.4

)

Phoenix

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,241

 

 

 

210.15

 

 

 

71.1

 

 

 

149.42

 

 

 

196.66

 

 

 

72.6

 

 

 

142.77

 

 

 

4.7

 

Seattle

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,774

 

 

 

204.17

 

 

 

78.8

 

 

 

160.84

 

 

 

188.57

 

 

 

78.8

 

 

 

148.62

 

 

 

8.2

 

San Francisco

 

 

5

 

 

 

3,701

 

 

 

239.00

 

 

 

83.5

 

 

 

199.56

 

 

 

224.15

 

 

 

82.4

 

 

 

184.78

 

 

 

8.0

 

Los Angeles

 

 

8

 

 

 

3,228

 

 

 

191.42

 

 

 

81.0

 

 

 

155.10

 

 

 

177.43

 

 

 

80.6

 

 

 

143.01

 

 

 

8.5

 

San Diego

 

 

4

 

 

 

3,331

 

 

 

195.57

 

 

 

82.3

 

 

 

160.98

 

 

 

182.90

 

 

 

80.5

 

 

 

147.30

 

 

 

9.3

 

Hawaii

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,682

 

 

 

323.10

 

 

 

88.7

 

 

 

286.48

 

 

 

324.57

 

 

 

84.1

 

 

 

273.08

 

 

 

4.9

 

Other

 

 

11

 

 

 

7,270

 

 

 

168.97

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

115.19

 

 

 

165.86

 

 

 

67.3

 

 

 

111.67

 

 

 

3.2

 

Domestic

 

 

86

 

 

 

49,864

 

 

 

221.23

 

 

 

77.6

 

 

 

171.59

 

 

 

214.43

 

 

 

77.1

 

 

 

165.33

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,024

 

 

$

149.56

 

 

 

83.4

%

 

$

124.71

 

 

$

142.14

 

 

 

81.9

%

 

$

116.35

 

 

 

7.2

%

Canada

 

 

2

 

 

 

849

 

 

 

177.16

 

 

 

60.5

 

 

 

107.20

 

 

 

175.83

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

119.97

 

 

 

(10.6

)

Latin America

 

 

2

 

 

 

557

 

 

 

281.25

 

 

 

71.6

 

 

 

201.42

 

 

 

258.09

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

184.59

 

 

 

9.1

 

International

 

 

9

 

 

 

2,430

 

 

 

186.97

 

 

 

72.8

 

 

 

136.10

 

 

 

178.00

 

 

 

74.8

 

 

 

133.14

 

 

 

2.2

 

All Markets -

     Constant US$

 

 

95

 

 

 

52,294

 

 

 

219.72

 

 

 

77.3

 

 

 

169.93

 

 

 

212.77

 

 

 

77.0

 

 

 

163.82

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparable Hotels in Nominal US$

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

5

 

 

 

1,024

 

 

$

149.56

 

 

 

83.4

%

 

$

124.71

 

 

$

169.55

 

 

 

81.9

%

 

$

138.79

 

 

 

(10.1

)%

Canada

 

 

2

 

 

 

849

 

 

 

177.16

 

 

 

60.5

 

 

 

107.20

 

 

 

203.55

 

 

 

68.2

 

 

 

138.89

 

 

 

(22.8

)

Latin America

 

 

2

 

 

 

557

 

 

 

281.25

 

 

 

71.6

 

 

 

201.42

 

 

 

335.90

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

240.25

 

 

 

(16.2

)

International

 

 

9

 

 

 

2,430

 

 

 

186.97

 

 

 

72.8

 

 

 

136.10

 

 

 

216.49

 

 

 

74.8

 

 

 

161.93

 

 

 

(16.0

)

Domestic

 

 

86

 

 

 

49,864

 

 

 

221.23

 

 

 

77.6

 

 

 

171.59

 

 

 

214.43

 

 

 

77.1

 

 

 

165.33

 

 

 

3.8

 

All Markets -

     Nominal US$

 

 

95

 

 

 

52,294

 

 

 

219.72

 

 

 

77.3

 

 

 

169.93

 

 

 

214.52

 

 

 

77.0

 

 

 

165.17

 

 

 

2.9

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For a discussion of our markets and constant US$ and nominal US$ presentation, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

Our west coast markets continued to perform well in 2015, as San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles and San Diego all had RevPAR increases of between 8% and 9.3%. Our San Diego properties led our domestic portfolio, with a RevPAR increase of 9.3% as strong group demand allowed our operators to focus business towards the higher-rated transient and group business, leading to a 6.9% improvement in average daily rate. Similarly, strong transient demand coupled with solid group business has allowed our operators to focus on higher-rated transient customers in all of our west coast markets. At our Hawaiian properties, average occupancy increased 4.5 percentage points due to strong group and transient demand, while average rate declined 0.5%.

The Boston market led our east coast markets as strong citywide demand, coupled with successful property specific promotional campaigns, led to increases in both transient and group demand. Conversely, in New York, new hotel supply coupled with a reduction


in international demand as a result of a strong dollar has led to a RevPAR decline of 1.7%. RevPAR grew just 0.1% in our DC Market due to the absorption of new supply, a decline in citywide events during the second half of the year and significant renovation projects that were completed during the first half of 2015 at our Grand Hyatt Washington and JW Marriott Washington DC.

In our south and central markets, Atlanta and Florida outperformed the portfolio with RevPAR growth of 7.8% and 7.1%, respectively. In Atlanta, renovations completed last year at the Westin Buckhead Atlanta and Grand Hyatt Atlanta in Buckhead led to strong rate growth. In Florida, strong group demand led to the 5.9% rate improvement and average occupancy of approximately 74%. The Chicago market was generally in-line with the portfolio. During the first half of the year, the market outperformed the portfolio driven by strong city-wide demand. However, as the year progressed, group demand declined, leading our operators to rely on discounted transient business. RevPAR for our Houston properties declined 7.4% due to disruption in the oil markets during 2015, which significantly hampered demand, as well as increasing market supply and the gainrenovation at the Houston Marriott Medical Center hotel.

On a constant dollar basis, our international markets experienced RevPAR growth of 2.2%, led by our Latin America properties with RevPAR growth of 9.1%, on dispositions, neta constant dollar basis, as strong group demand and renovations completed in 2014 led to improvements at our Mexico property, while the JW Marriott Rio de Janeiro benefited from the weak Real during the year; despite difficult comparisons to the World Cup in 2014. Our Canadian properties, in particular Calgary, were affected negatively by falling oil prices and disruption from renovations, which led to a RevPAR decrease of tax,10.6% for 2015.

Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type.

The following table sets forth performance information for our comparable hotels by property type as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Comparable Hotels by Type in Nominal US$

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

Property type (1)

 

No. of

Properties

 

 

No. of

Rooms

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Average

Room Rate

 

 

Average

Occupancy

Percentage

 

 

RevPAR

 

 

Percent

Change in

RevPAR

 

Urban

 

 

53

 

 

 

32,646

 

 

$

227.31

 

 

 

79.2

%

 

$

180.11

 

 

$

225.11

 

 

 

79.0

%

 

$

177.89

 

 

 

1.2

%

Suburban

 

 

23

 

 

 

8,627

 

 

 

181.93

 

 

 

72.4

 

 

 

131.64

 

 

 

170.64

 

 

 

71.6

 

 

 

122.15

 

 

 

7.8

 

Resort

 

 

11

 

 

 

7,101

 

 

 

263.97

 

 

 

72.3

 

 

 

190.79

 

 

 

255.46

 

 

 

71.2

 

 

 

181.91

 

 

 

4.9

 

Airport

 

 

8

 

 

 

3,920

 

 

 

161.31

 

 

 

81.7

 

 

 

131.80

 

 

 

150.15

 

 

 

82.5

 

 

 

123.91

 

 

 

6.4

 

All Types

 

 

95

 

 

 

52,294

 

 

 

219.72

 

 

 

77.3

 

 

 

169.93

 

 

 

214.52

 

 

 

77.0

 

 

 

165.17

 

 

 

2.9

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

For a discussion of our property types, see “—Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

Our suburban properties led the hotels which have been reclassified to discontinued operations, which includes assets held for sale and the results of sold hotels prior to their dispositionportfolio for the periods presented (in millions):year with RevPAR growth of 7.8% driven by average rate growth of 6.6%. Continuing a trend from prior year, high occupancy and average room rate in urban markets has helped to drive demand in adjacent suburban markets. Our airport properties experienced RevPAR growth of 6.4%, driven by strong average rate growth at our west coast airport properties. The RevPAR improvement at our resort properties of 4.9% was driven by a 3.3% increase in average rate and improvement in occupancy of 110 basis points. Our urban properties lagged the portfolio, with a RevPAR increase of 1.2%, average rate increase of 1.0% and a 20 basis point growth in occupancy. Our urban properties were affected negatively by weakness in the Washington, D.C., New York, and Houston markets.  

Hotel Sales by Business Mix. 

The information below is derived from business mix results from 86 comparable hotels for which 2015 and 2014 business mix information is available. In 2015, overall revenue growth was due to both group and transient growth. Revenue from our transient business increased 4.0%, reflecting an increase of 3.5% in average rate and a slight increase in room nights sold. Non-qualified discount transient room nights increased 9.3%, while lower-rated special corporate and government segments decreased 2.6%. Overall, group revenues improved 3.9% compared to the prior year, consisting of a 2.9% average room rate increase coupled with a 0.9% growth in group room nights sold. Corporate group revenue growth of 5.8% and association group revenue growth of 3.9% was offset partially by government and leisure growth of 0.2%.

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Revenues

 

$

104

 

 

$

264

 

 

$

288

 

Income before taxes

 

 

22

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

11

 

Gain on disposals, net of tax

 

 

97

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity and Capital Resources of Host Inc. and Host L.P. The liquidity and capital resources of Host Inc. and Host L.P. are derived primarily from the activities of Host L.P., which generates the capital required by our business from hotel operations, the incurrence of debt, and the issuance of OP units.units or the sale of properties. Host Inc.’sInc. is a REIT and its only significant asset is the ownership of partnership interests of Host L.P.; therefore, its financing and investing activities are conducted through Host L.P., except for the issuance of its common and preferred stock. Proceeds from stock issuances by Host Inc. are contributed to Host L.P. in exchange for OP units. Additionally, funds used by Host Inc. to pay dividends or to repurchase stock are provided by Host L.P. Therefore, while we have noted those areas in which it is important to distinguish between Host Inc. and Host L.P., we have not included a separate discussion of liquidity and capital resources as the discussion applies both to Host Inc. and Host L.P.

Overview. We look to maintain a capital structure and liquidity profile with an appropriateappropriate balance of cash, debt and equity in order to provide financial flexibility given the inherent volatility in the lodging industry. AsWe believe this strategy will result in a lower overall cost of capital, allow us to complete opportunistic investments and acquisitions and will position us to manage potential declines in operations have improved,throughout the lodging cycle. Over the past several years, we have maintaineddecreased our focus on strategically decreasingleverage as measured by our debt-to-equitynet debt-to-EBITDA ratio and reduced our debt service obligations, leading to an increase in our fixed charge coverage ratio.  

We intend to use available cash predominantly for acquisitions or other investments in our portfolio. If we are unable to find appropriate investment opportunities, we will consider other uses, such as a return of capital through (i) acquisitionsdividends or common stock repurchases, the amounts of which will be determined by our operations and other investments,market factors. Significant factors we review to determine the majorityamount and timing of which were completed with available cashcommon stock repurchases include the current stock price compared to our determination of the underlying value of our assets, current and proceeds from equity issuances,forecast operating results and (ii) the repayment and refinancingcompletion of senior notes and mortgage debt in order to extend maturity dates and lower interest rates.hotel sales.

We have structured our debt profile to maintain a balanced maturity schedule and to minimize the number of assets that are encumbered by mortgage debt. We have access to multiple types of financing as approximately 83%98% of our debt consists of senior notes exchangeable debentures and borrowings under our credit facility, none of which are collateralized by specific hotel properties. During 2013, ourOur senior notes wereunsecured debt is rated investment grade by both Moody’s Investor Services, Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor’s andRating Service, which has allowed us to borrow capital at lower rates than previously achieved. In 2016, we subsequently issued $400 million ofdid not issue any senior notes at 3¾%. In 2013, we repaid $800 million of senior notes and $277 million ofor incur any mortgage debt and refinanced $150repaid $137 million of mortgage debt. Additionally, only 10one of our consolidated hotels which represented just 3% of our 2013 revenues, will beis encumbered by mortgage debt subsequent to the repayment of a mortgage loan on March 1, 2014.

55debt.



We believe that we have sufficient liquidity and access to the capital markets to take advantage of opportunities to enhance our portfolio, withstand declines in operating cash flow, pay near-term debt maturities and fund our capital expenditures programs. We may continue to access the capital markets if favorable conditions exist in order to further enhance our liquidity and to fund cash needs. The table below details our significant cash flows for the three years ended December 31 (in millions):

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

$

417

 

 

$

826

 

 

$

1,113

 

 

$

221

 

 

$

666

 

 

$

839

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

444

 

 

 

(409

)

 

 

(287

)

 

 

151

 

 

 

(445

)

 

 

(173

)

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 

$

861

 

 

$

417

 

 

$

826

 

 

$

372

 

 

$

221

 

 

$

666

 

 

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

$

1,019

 

 

$

781

 

 

$

662

 

 

$

1,303

 

 

$

1,159

 

 

$

1,140

 

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions and investments

 

 

(259

)

 

 

(579

)

 

 

(1,096

)

 

 

(68

)

 

 

(442

)

 

 

(216

)

 

Dispositions and return of capital from investments

 

 

643

 

 

 

296

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

490

 

 

 

383

 

 

 

539

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

(436

)

 

 

(638

)

 

 

(542

)

 

 

(519

)

 

 

(658

)

 

 

(428

)

 

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuances of senior notes

 

 

400

 

 

 

800

 

 

 

796

 

 

 

 

 

 

898

 

 

 

 

 

Issuances of mortgage debt

 

 

150

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

Issuance of credit facility term loan

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

Net draws (repayments) on credit facility revolver

 

 

186

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

(82

)

 

 

120

 

 

 

(221

)

 

Repurchase of senior notes, including exchangeable debentures

 

 

(801

)

 

 

(1,795

)

 

 

(404

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,001

)

 

 

(150

)

 

Mortgage debt prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(411

)

 

 

(113

)

 

 

(210

)

Mortgage debt and other prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(137

)

 

 

(35

)

 

 

(384

)

 

Common stock repurchase

 

 

(218

)

 

 

(675

)

 

 

 

 

Host Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issuance

 

 

303

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

4

 

 

Dividends on common stock

 

 

(313

)

 

 

(187

)

 

 

(70

)

 

 

(596

)

 

 

(646

)

 

 

(469

)

 

Host L.P.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common OP unit issuance

 

 

303

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

4

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

(317

)

 

 

(190

)

 

 

(71

)

 

 

(603

)

 

 

(654

)

 

 

(475

)

 

Cash Requirements. We use cash for acquisitions, capital expenditures, debt payments, operating costs, corporate and other expenses, as well as dividends and distributions to stockholders and unitholders. As a REIT, Host Inc. is required to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gain, on an annual basis. Funds used by Host Inc. to make cash distributionspay dividends are provided by Host L.P. Our primary sources of cash areinclude cash from operations, proceeds from the sale of assets, borrowings under our credit facility and debt and equity issuances.

The following graph summarizes our aggregate Assuming the exercise of credit facility extensions, we have no significant debt maturities as of February 14, 2014:until 2019.  

(1)

The debt maturing in 2015 assumes the exercise of a put option by the holders of our exchangeable senior debentures.

Capital Resources. We depend primarily on external sources of capital to finance future growth, including acquisitions. As a result, the liquidityliquidity and debt capacity provided by our credit facility and the ability to issue senior unsecured debt are key components of our capital structure. Our financial flexibility (including our ability to incur debt, make distributions and make investments) is

56


contingent on our ability to maintain compliance with the financial covenants of such indebtedness, which include, among other things, the allowable amounts of leverage, interest coverage and fixed charges. During 2012 and 2013, we decreased our near-term debt maturities, expanded our borrowing capacity under our credit facility through a term loan and maintained compliance with our senior note and credit facility covenants.

If, at any time, we determine that market conditions are favorable, after taking into account our liquidity requirements, we may seek to issue and sell shares of Host Inc. common stock in registered public offerings, including through sales directly on the New York Stock Exchange under any future “at the market” offering program, or to issue and sell shares of Host Inc. preferred stock. We also may seek to cause Host L.P. to issue senior notes or debentures exchangeable for shares of Host Inc. common stock or senior notes.stock. Given our total debt level and maturity schedule, we also will continue to redeem or refinance senior notes and mortgage debt from time to time, taking advantage of favorable market conditions. In October 2013,February 2017, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors authorized repurchases of up to $680$250 million of senior notes exchangeable debentures and mortgage debt (otherother than in accordance with its terms), of which $530 million remains available under this authority.terms. We may purchase senior notes and exchangeable debentures for cash through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, a tender offer or, in some cases, through the early redemption of such securities pursuant to their terms. Repurchases of debt will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. Any refinancing or retirement before the maturity date will affect earnings and NAREIT FFO per diluted share as a result of the payment of any applicable call premiums and the acceleration of previously deferred financing costs. In addition, while we intend to use any available cash predominantly for acquisitions or other investments in our hotel portfolio, to the extent we do not identify appropriate investments, we may elect in the future to use available cash for other purposes, including share repurchases, subject to market conditions. Accordingly, in light of our priorities in managing our capital structure and liquidity profile and given prevailing conditions and relative pricing in the capital markets, we may, at any time, subject to applicable securities laws, be considering, or be in discussions with respect to the purchaserepurchase or issuance of exchangeable debentures and/or senior notes or the repurchase or sale of common stock, exchangeable debentures and/or senior notes.stock. Any such transactions may, subject to applicable securities laws, occur simultaneously.


We continue actively to explore potential acquisitions and anticipate that any such future acquisitions will be funded primarily by proceeds from sales of properties, but also potentially from equity offerings of Host Inc., or by issuances of OP units by Host L.P., the incurrence of debt, available cash or advances under our credit facility. Given the nature of thesethese transactions, we can make no assurances that we will be successful in acquiring any one or more hotels that we may review, bid on or negotiate to purchase. We may acquire additional properties through various structures, including transactions involving single assets, portfolios, joint ventures and acquisitions of the securities or assets of other REITs.

Counterparty Credit Risk. We are subject to counterparty credit risk, which relates to the ability of counterparties to meet their contractual payment obligations or the potential non-performance of counterparties to deliver contracted commodities or services at the contracted price. We assess the ability of our counterparties to fulfill their obligation to determine the impact, if any, of counterparty bankruptcy or insolvency on our financial condition. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to cash held at various financial institutions, access to our credit facility and amounts due or payable under our derivative contracts. Our credit exposure in each of these cases is limited. Our exposure with regard to our cash and the $779 million available capacity under the revolver portion of our credit facility is mitigated, as the credit risk is spread among a diversified group of investment grade financial institutions. At December 31, 2013,2016, the exposure risk related to our derivative contracts totaled $4$12 million and the counterparties were investment grade financial institutions.

Sources and Uses of Cash. OurIn 2016, our primary sources of cash includeincluded cash from operations, proceeds from debtasset sales, draws on our credit facility and returns from equity issuances and proceeds from asset sales. Usesinvestments. Our primary uses of cash during the year consisted of acquisitions, investments in our joint ventures, capital expenditures, operating costs, debt repayments, andcommon stock repurchases and distributions to equity holders. We anticipate that our sources and uses of cash will be similar during 2014.2017.

Cash Provided by Operations. Our cash provided by operations for 20132016 increased $238$144 million to $1,019$1,303 million compared to 2012, primarily due to2015, reflecting improved operations at our hotels and a decrease in cash interest payments.and debt extinguishment costs.

Cash Used in Investing Activities. Approximately $75$115 million of cash was used in investing activities during 20132016 compared to $886$732 million in 2012.2015. In addition to the acquisition investment and disposition activity detailed in the charts below, we spent approximately $436$519 million on capital expenditures, a decrease of $202compared to $658 million from 2012.in 2015. Our renewal and replacement capital expenditures for 20132016 were approximately $303$293 million, which reflects a decrease of approximately 17%23% from 20122015 levels. Our renewal and replacement capital expenditures generally are funded by the furniture, fixture and equipment funds established at certain of our hotels (typically 5% of property revenues) and by our available cash. We also spent approximately $133$226 million in 20132016 on ROI/redevelopment projects and acquisition capital expenditures, which reflects a decrease of approximately 51%18% compared to 20122015 levels. Additionally, we have capitalized certain internal costs and interest expense associated with our capital expenditureexpenditures projects in accordance with GAAP. These capitalized costs were $11$10 million, $11$13 million and $9$14 million for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Capital expenditures haveCash provided by investing activities totaled approximately $2.3 billion over$503 million and $394 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, and consisted of proceeds from the past five yearssale of ten hotels in 2016 and eight hotels in 2015, as a result, we believe that our properties arewell as the return of investment from joint ventures in a strong competitive position relative to their market competitors.both 2016 and 2015.

57


The following tables summarize significant investment activitiesacquisitions, dispositions and dispositions that have been completed asreturn of investments in affiliates through February 14, 201420, 2017 (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Cash Paid

 

 

Investment

Price

 

Acquisitions/Investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January

2014

 

Acquisition of The Powell Hotel

 

$

(75

)

 

$

(75

)

December

2013

 

Acquisition of land at the Times Square Marriott Marquis(1)

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(45

)

January - December

2013

 

Development costs for two hotels in Rio de Janeiro

 

 

(19

)

 

 

(19

)

May - August

2013

 

Investment in Euro JV

 

 

(67

)

 

 

(67

)

May

2013

 

Acquisition of Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach

 

 

(139

)

 

 

(139

)

November

2012

 

Investment in Euro JV – acquisition of portfolio of five hotels

 

 

(90

)

 

 

(90

)

November

2012

 

Investment in Maui JV (2)

 

 

 

 

(32

)

July

2012

 

Investment in Euro JV – acquisition of Le Méridien Grand Hotel Nuremberg

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(13

)

July

2012

 

Acquisition of Grand Hyatt Washington (3)

 

 

(417

)

 

 

(417

)

June-July

2012

 

Acquisition of land and development costs for two hotels in Rio de Janeiro

 

 

(26

)

 

 

(26

)

May – December

2012

 

Investment in the Hyatt Place, Nashville joint venture

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(5

)

March

2012

 

Investment in the Asia/Pacific joint venture – Citigate Perth acquisition

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(11

)

 

 

 

Total acquisitions/investments

 

$

(882

)

 

$

(939

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction Date

 

Description of Transaction

 

 

 

Investment

 

Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February

2017

 

Acquisition of The Don CeSar

 

 

 

$

(214

)

June - July

2016

 

Acquisition of the Key Bridge Marriott ground lease

 

 

 

 

(54

)

December

2015

 

Acquisition of land under Minneapolis City Center Marriott

 

 

 

 

(34

)

June

2015

 

Acquisition of The Phoenician

 

 

 

 

(400

)

 

 

 

Total acquisitions

 

 

 

$

(702

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Investment price includes $25 million of consideration paid in prior years.


(2)

Includes $24 million for the fair value of the land transferred to the Maui JV as well as our portion of the pre-formation expenditures of $8 million.

(3)

This hotel was purchased for a price of $400 million, plus approximately $9 million for the settlement of a derivative liability and for other related assets and the acquisition of the FF&E replacement fund for $6 million and $2 million of working capital.

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Net Proceeds(1)

 

 

Sales Price

 

Dispositions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February

2014

 

Disposition of Courtyard Nashua

 

$

9

 

 

$

10

 

January

2014

 

Sale of 89% interest in the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown(2)

 

290

 

 

 

270

 

December

2013

 

Disposition of Dallas/Addison Marriott Quorum by the Galleria

 

53

 

 

 

56

 

November

2013

 

Disposition of Four Seasons Hotel Atlanta

 

62

 

 

 

63

 

November

2013

 

Disposition of Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront

 

83

 

 

 

87

 

June

2013

 

Disposition of The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco

 

146

 

 

 

161

 

April

2013

 

Sale of land adjacent to Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

 

24

 

 

 

24

 

January

2013

 

Disposition of Atlanta Marriott Marquis

 

276

 

 

 

293

 

December

2012

 

Deferred proceeds related to sale of the Hospitality Trust Properties (“HPT”) properties

 

51

 

 

 

51

 

November

2012

 

Proceeds from repayment of a mortgage loan held on the portfolio of hotels acquired by the Euro JV

 

80

 

 

 

80

 

November

2012

 

Proceeds from transfer of land to Maui JV

 

12

 

 

 

12

 

November

2012

 

Disposition of Toronto Airport Marriott

 

30

 

 

 

32

 

August

2012

 

Disposition of Hartford Marriott Rocky Hill

 

5

 

 

 

7

 

March

2012

 

Disposition of San Francisco Airport Marriott

 

108

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

 

Total dispositions

 

$

1,229

 

 

$

1,259

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction Date

 

Description of Transaction

 

Net Proceeds(1)

 

 

Sales Price

 

Dispositions/Return of Investments in Affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January

2017

 

Disposition of JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa

 

$

160

 

 

$

172

 

September

2016

 

Disposition of Novotel Christchurch Cathedral Square and ibis

     Christchurch

 

 

26

 

 

 

31

 

August

2016

 

Distribution from Hyatt Place Nashville JV

 

 

14

 

 

N/A

 

June

2016

 

Disposition of Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center

 

 

68

 

 

 

71

 

June

2016

 

Disposition of Seattle Airport Marriott

 

 

90

 

 

 

97

 

June

2016

 

Disposition of Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center and San

     Cristobal Tower, Chile

 

 

89

 

 

 

95

 

May

2016

 

Disposition of Manhattan Beach Marriott

 

 

78

 

 

 

82

 

February - March

2016

 

Disposition of Novotel Wellington and ibis Wellington

 

 

44

 

 

 

45

 

February

2016

 

Disposition of San Diego Marriott Mission Valley

 

 

72

 

 

 

76

 

February

2016

 

Distribution from Asia/Pacific JV

 

 

9

 

 

 

9

 

January - December

2015

 

Distribution from Euro JV

 

 

115

 

 

N/A

 

October - November

2015

 

Disposition of three hotels in New Zealand

 

 

61

 

 

 

98

 

August

2015

 

Disposition of Kansas City Airport Marriott

 

 

9

 

 

 

9

 

June

2015

 

Disposition of Park Ridge Marriott and Chicago Marriott O'Hare

 

 

88

 

 

 

89

 

June

2015

 

Disposition of Sheraton Needham

 

 

53

 

 

 

54

 

March

2015

 

Disposition of Delta Meadowvale Hotel & Conference Centre

 

 

32

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

1,008

 

 

 

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Proceeds are net of mortgage debt repayments, FF&E replacement funds paid by the purchasers and retained at the hotels, transfer taxes and other sales costs.  

(2)

Sales price represents the 89% interest in the hotel that was sold. Net proceeds also include our 11% portion of the proceeds received from the $230 million mortgage loan issued by the partnership at closing.  

58


Cash Provided by/Used in Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was $493$1,037 million for 2013,2016, as compared to $305 $857 million in 2012. During 2013, cash2015. Cash used in financing activities in 2016 primarily consisted of the repayment of mortgage debt repayments or repurchasessecured by the Hyatt Regency Reston and dividend paymentsthe New Zealand hotels that were sold, the net repayment on the revolver portion of the credit facility of $82 million, the repurchase of approximately $1.7 billion, while we received proceeds$218 million of approximately $1.2 billion throughcommon stock and the issuancepayment of debt and equity securities.cash dividends of $596 million.  

The following table summarizes significant debt issuances, net of deferred financing costs, that have been completed as of February 14, 201420, 2017 (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Net Proceeds

 

Debt Issuances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February-December

2013

 

Net draw on revolver portion of credit facility

 

$

186

 

December

2013

 

Issuance of mortgage debt on the Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

150

 

March

2013

 

Proceeds from the issuance of $400 million 334% Series D senior notes

 

396

 

February – December

2012

 

Net draw on credit facility

 

142

 

August

2012

 

Proceeds from the issuance of $450 million 434% Series C senior notes

 

443

 

July

2012

 

Borrowing of $500 million Term Loan

 

498

 

June

2012

 

Proceeds from the issuance of a mortgage loan secured by the Hyatt Regency Reston

 

98

 

March

2012

 

Proceeds from the issuance of $350 million 514% Series B senior notes

 

344

 

 

 

 

Total issuances

 

$

2,257

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Net Proceeds

 

Debt Issuances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December

2015

 

Borrowings on the $500 million 2015 Term Loan Facility

 

$

200

 

June - December

2015

 

Net draw on revolver portion of credit facility

 

 

120

 

October

2015

 

Proceeds from the issuance of $400 million 4.5% Series F senior notes

 

 

395

 

September

2015

 

Borrowings on the $500 million 2015 Term Loan Facility

 

 

297

 

May

2015

 

Proceeds from the issuance of $500 million 4% Series E senior notes

 

 

495

 

 

 

 

Total issuances

 

$

1,507

 


The following table presents significant debt repayments, including prepayment premiums, that have been completed as of February 14, 201420, 2017 (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Amount

 

Cash Repayments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February

2014

 

Redemption of $150 million of 634% Series Q senior notes

 

$

(152

)

January

2014

 

Repayment on revolver portion of credit facility

 

 

(225

)

December

2013

 

Repayment of mortgage loan on The Westin Denver Downtown

 

 

(31

)

December

2013

 

Repayment of mortgage loan on the Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

(134

)

September

2013

 

Redemption of $200 million of 634% Series Q senior notes

 

 

(202

)

June

2013

 

Redemption of $200 million of 634% Series Q senior notes

 

 

(202

)

May

2013

 

Repayment of mortgage loan on the Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

(246

)

May

2013

 

Redemption of $400 million of 9% Series T senior notes

 

 

(418

)

December

2012

 

Redemption of $100 million of 634% Series Q senior notes

 

 

(102

)

October

2012

 

Redemption of the remaining 2007 Debentures

 

 

(2

)

September

2012

 

Redemption of $150 million of 634% Series Q senior notes

 

 

(153

)

August-September

2012

 

Redemption of $650 million of 638% Series O senior notes

 

 

(657

)

May

2012

 

Repayment of 10% senior notes due May 2012

 

 

(7

)

April

2012

 

Redemption of 2007 Debentures

 

 

(386

)

April-May

2012

 

Redemption of $500 million of 678% Series S senior notes

 

 

(508

)

April

2012

 

Repayment of 7.5% mortgage loan secured by JW Marriott, Washington, D.C.

 

 

(113

)

2012/2013

 

 

Principal amortization

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

Total cash repayments

 

$

(3,542

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash Debt Transaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March

2013

 

Exchange of a portion of the 2004 Debentures for Host Inc. common stock (1)

 

$

(174

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Amount

 

Debt Repayments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January - December

2016

 

Net repayment on the revolver portion of credit facility

 

$

(82

)

September

2016

 

Repayment of NZ$23 million mortgage loan on Novotel and ibis Christchurch

 

 

(17

)

April

2016

 

Repayment of mortgage loan on the Hyatt Regency Reston hotel

 

 

(100

)

February - March

2016

 

Repayment of NZ$30 million mortgage loan on Novotel and ibis Wellington

 

 

(20

)

November

2015

 

Redemption of $500 million of 6% Series V senior notes

 

 

(515

)

October - November

2015

 

Repayment of NZ$52 million mortgage loan on three New Zealand hotels

 

 

(35

)

June

2015

 

Redemption of $500 million of 5 7/8% Series X senior notes

 

 

(515

)

 

 

 

Total cash repayments

 

$

(1,284

)

Non-cash Debt Transaction

 

 

 

 

July - October

2015

 

Exchange of Debentures for common stock

 

$

(399

)

(1)

In connection with the exchange, Host L.P. issued approximately 11.5 million common OP units to Host Inc.

Equity/Capital Transactions. In 2013, Host Inc. issued 16.9 million shares of common stock, at an average price of $17.78 per share, for proceeds of approximately $297 million, net of commissions of approximately $3 million. These issuances were made in

59


“at-the-market” offerings pursuant to sales agency financing agreements with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. The net proceeds were used to fund hotel acquisitions, development projects and a portion of our ROI/redevelopment capital expenditures. There were no “at-the-market” issuances in the fourth quarter of 2013 and there is no remaining capacity under these sales agency financing agreements. In 2012, Host Inc. issued 17.5 million shares of common stock in “at-the-market” offerings, at an average price of $15.67 per share, for proceeds of approximately $271 million, net of commissions of approximately $3 million. The net proceeds were used to fund a portion of the acquisition price of the Grand Hyatt Washington and for general corporate purposes. In exchange for the cash proceeds of the shares issued by Host Inc., Host L.P. issued OP Units to Host Inc. of 16.5 million and 17.1 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following table summarizes significant equity transactions that have been completed as of February 14, 201420, 2017 (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Amount

 

Equity of Host Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January

2014

 

Dividend payment (1) (2)

 

$

(98

)

January–December

2013

 

Dividend payments (2)

 

 

(313

)

January–September

2013

 

Issuance of approximately 16.9 million common shares under Host Inc.’s “at the-market” equity program (3)

 

 

297

 

January–December

2012

 

Dividend payments (2)

 

 

(187

)

January–December

2012

 

Issuance of approximately 17 million common shares under Host Inc.’s continuous equity offering programs (3)

 

 

271

 

 

 

 

Net proceeds from equity transactions

 

$

(30

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash Equity Transaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March

2013

 

Issuance of approximately 11.7 million common shares through the exchange of the 2004 Debentures (4)

 

$

174

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

 

Transaction Date

 

 

Description of Transaction

 

Amount

 

Equity of Host Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January

2017

 

Dividend payment (1)(2)

 

$

(185

)

January - December

2016

 

Dividend payments (2)

 

 

(596

)

January - December

2016

 

Repurchase of 13.8 million shares of Host Inc. common stock

 

 

(218

)

January - December

2015

 

Dividend payments (2)

 

 

(646

)

May - December

2015

 

Repurchase of 38.3 million shares of Host Inc. common stock

 

 

(675

)

 

 

 

Cash payments on equity transactions

 

$

(2,320

)

Non-cash Equity Transaction

 

 

 

 

July - October

2015

 

Issuance of approximately 32 million common shares of Host Inc. for the

     exchange of the Debentures (3)

 

$

399

 

(1)

Our dividend payment for the fourth quarter of 20132016 was made in January 2014,2017, but accrued at December 31, 2013.2016.

(2)

In connection with the dividends, Host L.P. made distributions of $99$187 million in 2014, $3172017, $603 million in 20132016 and $190$654 million in 20122015 to its common unit holders.

(3)

In exchange for the cash consideration received from the issuance of these shares, Host L.P. issued to Host Inc. approximately 16.5 million and 17 million common OP units in 2013 and 2012, respectively.  

(4)

In connection with the exchange, Host L.P. issued approximately 11.531.3 million common OP units to Host Inc.

60



Financial Condition

As of December 31, 2013,2016, our total debt was approximately $4.8$3.6 billion, of which 71%65% carried a fixed rate of interest. Total debt was comprised of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Series Q senior notes, with a rate of 6¾% due June 2016 (1)

 

$

150

 

 

$

550

 

Series T senior notes, with a rate of 9% due May 2017

 

 

 

 

 

391

 

Series V senior notes, with a rate of 6% due November 2020

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

Series X senior notes, with a rate of 5⅞% due June 2019

 

 

497

 

 

 

497

 

Series Z senior notes, with a rate of 6% due October 2021

 

 

300

 

 

 

300

 

Series B senior notes, with a rate of 5¼% due March 2022

 

 

350

 

 

 

350

 

Series C senior notes, with a rate of 4¾% due March 2023

 

 

450

 

 

 

450

 

Series D senior notes, with a rate of 3¾% due October 2023

 

 

400

 

 

 

 

2004 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 3¼% due April 2024

 

 

 

 

 

175

 

2009 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 2½% due October 2029

 

 

371

 

 

 

356

 

Total senior notes

 

 

3,018

 

 

 

3,569

 

Credit facility revolver (1)

 

 

446

 

 

 

263

 

Credit facility term loan due July 2017

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

Mortgage debt (non-recourse), with an average interest rate of 4.1% and 4.5% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, maturing through January 2024

 

 

709

 

 

 

993

 

Other

 

 

86

 

 

 

86

 

Total debt

 

$

4,759

 

 

$

5,411

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The Series Q senior notes were redeemed in the first quarter of 2014. We also repaid $225 million of the revolver.

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Series Z senior notes, with a rate of 6% due October 2021

 

$

297

 

 

$

297

 

Series B senior notes, with a rate of 5¼% due March 2022

 

 

347

 

 

 

347

 

Series C senior notes, with a rate of 4¾% due March 2023

 

 

446

 

 

 

445

 

Series D senior notes, with a rate of 3¾% due October 2023

 

 

398

 

 

 

397

 

Series E senior notes, with a rate of 4% due June 2025

 

 

496

 

 

 

495

 

Series F senior notes, with a rate of 4½% due February 2026

 

 

396

 

 

 

395

 

Total senior notes

 

 

2,380

 

 

 

2,376

 

Credit facility revolver

 

 

209

 

 

 

295

 

2014 Credit facility term loan due June 2017

 

 

500

 

 

 

499

 

2015 Credit facility term loan due September 2020

 

 

497

 

 

 

497

 

Mortgage debt (non-recourse), with an average interest rate of 3.4% and 4.7% at

     December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, maturing through November 2017

 

 

63

 

 

 

200

 

Total debt

 

$

3,649

 

 

$

3,867

 

Aggregate debt maturities at December 31, 20132016 are as follows (in millions):

 

 

Senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

Mortgage debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

Mortgage debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

credit facility

 

 

and other

 

 

Total

 

 

credit facility

 

 

and other

 

 

Total

 

2014

 

$

 

 

$

332

 

 

$

332

 

2015 (1)

 

 

846

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

858

 

2016 (2)

 

 

150

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

408

 

2017

 

 

500

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

540

 

 

$

500

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

562

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

211

 

 

 

 

 

 

211

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

2021

 

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,500

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

2,650

 

 

 

2,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,100

 

 

 

3,996

 

 

 

792

 

 

 

4,788

 

 

 

3,611

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

3,673

 

Deferred financing costs

 

 

(23

)

 

 

 

 

 

(23

)

Unamortized (discounts) premiums, net

 

 

(32

)

 

 

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

Fair value hedge adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

$

3,964

 

 

$

795

 

 

$

4,759

 

 

$

3,586

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

3,649

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The debt maturing in 2015 includes $400 million of our exchangeable senior debentures that are subject to a put option by holders in that year and $225 million outstanding under the credit facility that was repaid in January 2014.

(2)

Includes $150 million Series Q senior notes that were repaid in February 2014.

Senior Notes. The following summary is a description of the material provisions of the indentures governing our various senior notes issued by Host L.P., to which we refer to collectively as the senior notes indenture. We pay interest on each series of our outstanding seniorsenior notes semi-annually in arrears at the respective annual rates indicated on the table above. Under the terms of our senior notes indenture, our senior notes are equal in right of payment with all of Host L.P.’s unsubordinated indebtedness and senior to all subordinated obligations of Host L.P.

Pledges and Guarantees. Under the senior notes indenture,indentures, all Host L.P. subsidiaries which guarantee Host L.P. debt are required to similarly guarantee debt issuances under the indenture. Also, to the extent the equity of any subsidiaries of Host L.P. areis pledged to secure borrowings under the credit facility, such collateral likewise is required to secure senior note issuances under the

61


senior notes indenture.indentures. While the credit facility currently does not include any subsidiary guarantees or pledges of equity interests, such guarantees or pledges subsequently will be subsequently required in the event that Host L.P.’s leverage ratio exceeds 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters at a time that Host L.P. does not have an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating. In the event that such guarantee and pledge requirement is triggered, the guarantees and pledges would ratably benefit the credit facility, as well as the senior notes issued under the senior notes indenture and certain hedging and bank product arrangements with lenders that are parties to the credit facility. If triggered, the guarantees and pledges only would be required by certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries of Host L.P. and a substantial portion of our subsidiaries would not provide guarantees or pledges of equity interests. Further, if at any time our leverage ratio falls below 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters or Host L.P. has an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating, such guarantees and pledges may be released.


Series D Senior Notes RestrictiveIndenture Covenants

Covenants for Senior Notes Issued After We Attained an Investment Grade Rating

No senior notes were issued in 2016. On March 28, 2013,October 14, 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of $400 million aggregate principal amount of Series DF senior notes bearing interest at a rate of 3.75%4.5% per year due in 2023.2026. The Series DF senior notes are not redeemable prior to 90 days before the October 15, 2023February 1, 2026 maturity date, except at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus a make-whole premium as set forth in the senior notes indenture, plus accrued andand unpaid interest to the applicable redemption date.

On May 15, 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of Series E senior notes bearing interest at a rate of 4% per year due in 2025. The Series E senior notes are not redeemable prior to 90 days before the June 15, 2025 maturity date, except at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus a make-whole premium as set forth in the senior notes indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the applicable redemption date.

The Series E and F senior notes were issued under our existinga new senior notes indenture and have covenants customary for investment grade debt, primarily limitations on our ability to incur debt. There are no restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. Because theseThese senior notes were issued after we attained an investment grade rating while all other series ofhave covenants similar to our Series D senior notes, were issued before we had attained an investment grade rating, the covenantsbut are different than the covenants applicable to our otherprior series of senior notes.notes issued before we attained our investment grade rating.

Under the terms of the Series D, E and F senior notes, Host L.P.’s ability to incur indebtedness is subject to restrictions and the satisfaction of various conditions, including the achievement of an EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio of at least 1.5x by Host L.P. As calculated, this ratio excludes from interest expense items such as call premiums and deferred financing charges that are included in interest expense on Host L.P.’s consolidated statement of operations.operations. In addition, the calculation is based on Host L.P.’s pro forma results for the four prior fiscal quarters, giving effect to certain transactions, such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings, as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Other covenants limiting Host L.P.’s ability to incur indebtedness include maintaining total indebtedness of less than 65% of adjusted total assets (using undepreciated real estate book values), maintaining secured indebtedness of less than 40% of adjusted total assets (using undepreciated real estate book values) and maintaining total unencumbered assets of at least 150% of the aggregate principal amount of outstanding unsecured indebtedness of Host L.P. and its subsidiaries. So long as Host L.P. maintains the required level of interest coverage and satisfies these and other conditions in the senior notes indenture, it may incur additional debt.  

We are in compliance with all of the financial covenants applicable to our Series D, E and F senior notes. The following table summarizes the financial tests contained in the senior notes indenture for our Series D, E and F senior notes and our actual credit ratios as of December 31, 2013:2016:  

 

 

Actual Ratio

 

 

Covenant Requirement

Unencumbered assets tests

 

426%

526

%

 

Minimum ratio of 150%

Total indebtedness to total assets

 

25%

19

%

 

Maximum ratio of 65%

Secured indebtedness to total assets

 

3.6%<1

%

 

Maximum ratio of 40%

EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio

 

5.9x

10.1

x

 

Minimum ratio of 1.5x

Prior Series ofCovenants for Senior Notes Restrictive CovenantsIssued Before We Attained an Investment Grade Rating

Currently, our senior notes have an investment grade rating from both Moody's and Standard & Poor's. As a result, many of the restrictive covenants contained in the senior notes indenture and the supplemental indentures for our prior series of senior notes are not applicable, asas they do not apply for so long as such series of notes maintain an investment grade rating from both Moody's and Standard & Poor's. The following primary covenants continue to apply to our existing senior notes (other than our Series D, E and F senior notes):

restrict our ability to sell all or substantially all assets or merge with or into other companies; and

restrict our ability to sell all or substantially all of our assets or merge with or into other companies; and

require us to make an offer to repurchase the existing senior notes then currently outstanding upon the occurrence of a change of control.

require us to make an offer to repurchase the existing senior notes then currently outstanding upon the occurrence of a change of control.

62


If our senior notes are no longer are rated investment grade by either or both of Moody's and Standard & Poor's, then the following covenants and other restrictions will be reinstated for our existing senior notes (but will not apply to the Series D, E and F senior notes which have different covenants):

our ability to incur indebtedness and make distributions will be subject to restrictions and the satisfaction of various conditions, including the achievement of an EBITDA-to­interest coverage ratio of at least 2.0x. We will be able to make


distributions to enable Host Inc. to pay dividends on its preferred stock, if any, under the senior notes indenture when our EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio is above 1.7 to 1.0. This ratio is calculated in accordance with the terms of our senior notes indenture applicable to our existingnon-investment grade senior notes based on pro forma results for the four prior fiscal quarters, giving effect to transactions such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings, as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Interest expense excludes items such as the gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt, deferred financing charges related to the senior notes or the credit facility, and amortization of debt premiums or discounts that were recorded at acquisition of a loan in order to establish the debt at fair value, and, during the year ended December 31, 2013, approximately $15 million of non-cash interest, which represents expense recorded as a result of the implementation in 2009 of an accounting requirement relating to our outstanding Exchangeable Senior Debentures.value. These amounts are included in interest expense on our consolidated statements of operations;

other covenants limiting our ability to incur indebtedness and make distributions would include maintaining total indebtedness of less than 65% of adjusted total assets (using undepreciated real estate book values), excluding intangible assets, and maintaining secured indebtedness and subsidiary indebtedness of less than 45% of adjusted total assets. So long as we maintain the required level of interest coverage and satisfy these and other conditions in the senior notes indenture applicable to our existing senior notes, we may make preferred or common OP unit distributions and incur additional debt, including debt incurred in connection with an acquisition. Even if we are below the coverage levels otherwise required to incur debt and make distributions when our senior notes no longer are rated investment grade, we still will be permitted to incur certain types of debt, including (i) credit facility debt, (ii) refinancing debt, (iii) up to $400 million of mortgage debt which proceeds would be used to repay debt under the credit facility (and permanently reduce our ability to borrow under the credit facility by such amount), and (iv) up to $150 million of other debt. We also will be permitted to make distributions of estimated taxable income that are necessary to maintain Host Inc.'s REIT status;

other covenants limiting our ability to incur indebtedness and make distributions would include maintaining total indebtedness of less than 65% of adjusted total assets (using undepreciated real estate book values), excluding intangible assets, and maintaining secured indebtedness and subsidiary indebtedness of less than 45% of adjusted total assets. So long as we maintain the required level of interest coverage and satisfy these and other conditions in the senior notes indenture applicable to our existing senior notes, we may make preferred or common OP unit distributions and incur additional debt, including debt incurred in connection with an acquisition. Even if we are below the coverage levels otherwise required to incur debt and make distributions when our senior notes no longer are rated investment grade, we still will be permitted to incur certain types of debt, including (i) credit facility debt, (ii) refinancing debt, (iii) up to $400 million of mortgage debt, which proceeds would be used to repay debt under the credit facility (and permanently reduce our ability to borrow under the credit facility by such amount), and (iv) up to $150 million of other debt. We also will be permitted to make distributions of estimated taxable income that are necessary to maintain Host Inc.'s REIT status;

a requirement to maintain unencumbered assets, based on undepreciated book values, of not less than 125% of the aggregate amount of senior note debt, plus other debt not secured by mortgages. This coverage requirement must be maintained at all times and is distinct from the coverage requirements necessary to incur debt or make distributions discussed above (which consequences, where we fall below the coverage level, are limited to restricting our ability to incur new debt or make distributions, but which would not otherwise cause a default under our senior notes indenture); and

a requirement to maintain unencumbered assets, based on undepreciated book values, of not less than 125% of the aggregate amount of senior note debt, plus other debt not secured by mortgages. This coverage requirement must be maintained at all times and is distinct from the coverage requirements necessary to incur debt or make distributions discussed above (which consequences, where we fall below the coverage level, are limited to restricting our ability to incur new debt or make distributions, but which would not otherwise cause a default under our senior notes indenture); and

our ability to make distributions on, redeem or repurchase our OP units; permit payment or distribution restrictions on certain of our subsidiaries; sell assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; and create certain liens will be restricted.

our ability to make distributions on, redeem or repurchase our OP units; permit payment or distribution restrictions on certain of our subsidiaries; sell assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; and create certain liens will be restricted.

The following summarizes the actual credit ratios for our existing senior notes (other than the Series D, E and F senior notes) as of December 31, 20132016 and the covenant requirements contained in the senior notes indenture that would be applicable at such times as our existing senior notes no longer are rated investment grade by either of Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s. Even if we were to lose the investment grade rating, we would be in compliance with allall of our financial covenants under the senior notes indenture:

 

 

Actual Ratio*

 

 

Covenant Requirement

Unencumbered assets tests

 

434%

532

%

 

Minimum ratio of 125%

Total indebtedness to total assets

 

24.8%

19

%

 

Maximum ratio of 65%

Secured indebtedness to total assets

 

3.2%<1

%

 

Maximum ratio of 45%

EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio

 

5.9x

10.1

x

 

Minimum ratio of 2.0x

___________

 

 

*

Because of differences in the calculation methodology between our Series D, Series E and Series F senior notes and our other senior notes, our actual ratios as reported can be slightly different.  

Exchangeable Debentures. As of December 31, 2013, we haveIn 2009, Host L.P. issued $400 million of 2½% exchangeableexchangeable senior debentures outstandingdebentures. In October 2015, Host L.P. gave notice that were issued on December 22, 2009 (the “2009 Debentures”). On March 28, 2013, we converted $174 million of 3¼% debentures that were issued on March 16, 2004 into 11.7 million shares of Host Inc. common stock and redeemed the remaining $1 million for cash. The 2009 Debentures are equal in right of payment withit would redeem all of our other senior notes. Holders have the right to require us to purchase the 2009its currently outstanding Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount outstanding plus accrued interest (the “put option”) on October 15, 2015 and on certain other subsequent dates. Holders of the 2009 Debentures also have the right to exchange the 2009 Debentures prior to maturity under certain conditions, including at any time at which the closingcash redemption price of Host Inc.’s common stock is more than 130% of the exchange price per share for at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days of the

63


calendar quarter or at any time up to two days prior to the date on which the 2009 Debentures have been called for redemption. We can redeem for cash all, or part, of the 2009 Debentures at any time subsequent to October 20, 2015, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest. If, at anyAt the time, we elect to redeem the 2009 Debentures were exchangeable and the exchange price was equivalent to a Host Inc. share price of $12.45. Based on Host Inc.’s then current stock price, the exchange value exceedsof the Debentures exceeded the cash redemption price we would expectand holders of all but $1 million of the holders toelectDebentures elected to exchange the 2009their Debentures for shares of Host Inc. common stock at the respective exchange value rather than receive the cash redemption price. The exchange value is equal to the applicable exchange rate multiplied by the price of Host Inc.’s common stock. Upon exchange, the 2009 Debentures would be exchanged for Host Inc.’s common stock, cash or a combination thereof, at our option. As of December 31, 2013, the closing price of Host Inc.’s common stock exceeded 130% of the exchange price for more than 20 of 30 consecutive prior trading days. Therefore, the 2009 Debentures are exchangeable by holders through March 31, 2014. Whether the 2009 Debentures continue to be exchangeable after March 31, 2014 will depend on future trading prices of Host Inc’s common stock. Currently, each $1,000 Debenture would be exchanged for 74.7034 Host Inc. common shares (for an equivalent per share price of $13.39), for a total of 29.9 million shares.  

We separately account for the liability and equity components of our 2009 Debentures in order to reflect the fair value of the liability component based on our non-convertible borrowing cost at the issuance date. Accordingly, we record the liability components of the Debentures at fair value as of the date of issuance and amortize the resulting discount as an increase to interest expense through the initial put option date of the 2009 Debentures, which is the expected life of the debt. However, there is no impact of this accounting treatment on our cash interest payments. We measured the fair value of the debt components of the 2009 Debentures at issuance based on an effective interest rate of 6.9%.par. As a result, we attributed $82issued 32 million shares of Host Inc. common stock upon exchange (including $8.7 million of the proceeds receivedDebentures that had elected to the conversion featureexchange in July 2015) and redeemed approximately $1 million of the 2009 Debentures. This amount represents the excess proceeds received over the fair value of the debt at the date of issuance and is included in Host Inc.’s additional paid-in capital and Host L.P.’s partner’s capital on the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2013, the debt carrying value and unamortized discount were $371 million and $29 million, respectively.Debentures for cash.

Interest expense recorded for the 2009 Debentures and our prior series of exchangeable debentures for the periods presented consists of the following (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Contractual interest expense (cash)

 

$

10

 

 

$

19

 

 

$

31

 

Non-cash interest expense due to discount amortization

 

 

15

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

31

 

Total interest expense

 

$

25

 

 

$

36

 

 

$

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit Facility. On November 22, 2011,September 10, 2015, we entered into a newthe third amended and restated senior revolving credit and term loan facility with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch andSecurities Inc., The Bank of NovaNova Scotia, The Bank of New York Mellon, Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as co-documentation agents, and certain other agents and lenders. The credit facility allows for revolving borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1 billion, includingbillion. The revolver also includes a foreign currency


subfacility for Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, New Zealand dollars, Japanese yen, Euros and British pound sterling and, if available to the lenders, Mexican pesos of up to the foreign currency equivalent of $500 million, subject to a lower amount in the case of New Zealand dollar and Mexican pesos borrowings. The credit facility also provides a term loan facility of $1 billion (which we have fully utilized), a subfacility of up to $100 million for swingline borrowings in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, Euros or British pounds sterling and a subfacility of up to $100 million for issuances of letters of credit. Host L.P. also has the option to increase the aggregate principal amount of the revolving credit facility and/or term loan facility of the credit facility by up to $500 million, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and satisfaction of certain conditions.

The revolving credit facility has an initial scheduled maturity of November 2015,June 2018, with the option for Host L.P. to extend the term for two additional six-month terms, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of an extension fee and the accuracy of representations and warranties, and $500 million of term loans have an initial scheduled maturity of June 2017, with an option for Host L.P. to extend the term for onetwo additional year,years, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of an extension fee.

Credit Facility Term Loan. On July 25, 2012, we expanded the credit facility to add a new term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $500 million. The term loan was established through an exercise of the option under the credit facility to increase the amount of the facility by up to $500 million. We also amended the credit facility to allow us to retain the ability to exercise this option in the future for up to an additionalsimilar conditions. A second $500 million of commitments, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and the satisfaction of the other conditions specified in the credit facility.

The term loanloans will mature in July 2017. The maturity date ofSeptember 2020.

Neither the revolving loan commitments under the credit facility remains unchanged. Thenor the term loan does not requireloans, as applicable, requires any scheduled amortization payments prior to maturity. In 2013 and prior years, we paid interest on the term loan at floating interest rates plus a margin ranging from 165 to 265 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s consolidated leverage ratio). On and after January 24, 2014, the date on which Host L.P. elected ratings-based pricing, we will pay interest on the term loan at floating rates plus a margin ranging from 115 to 200 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). Based on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating at January 24, 2014, the margin would be 145 basis points. The term loanloans otherwise isare subject to the same terms and conditions as those in the credit facility regarding subsidiary guarantees and pledges of security interests in subsidiaries, operational covenants, financial covenants and events of default (as discussed below).

64


Collateral and Guarantees. The credit facility does not currently include any subsidiary guaranteesguarantees or pledges of equity interests in our subsidiaries or any other security, and the guarantees and pledges are required only in the event that Host L.P.’s leverage ratio exceeds 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters at a time that Host L.P. does not have an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating. In the event that such guarantee and pledge requirement is triggered, the guarantees and pledges would ratably benefit the credit facility, as well as the notes outstanding under Host L.P.’s senior notes indenture, interest rate and currency hedges and certain other hedging and bank product arrangements with lenders that are parties to the credit facility. Even when triggered, the guarantees and pledges only would be required by certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries of Host L.P. and a substantial portion of our subsidiaries would provide neither guarantees nor pledges of equity interests. Further, if at any time our leverage ratio falls below 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters or Host L.P. has an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating, such guarantees and pledges may be released.

Prepayments. Voluntary prepayments of therevolver borrowings and term loans under the credit facility are permitted in whole or in part without premium or penalty. The loans under the creditcredit facility are required to be prepaid in the event that asset sales reduce adjusted total assets (using undepreciated real estate book values) to below $10 billion if we do not reinvest the proceeds of those asset sales in new properties. At December 31, 2013,2016, we have adjusted total assets, as defined in our credit facility, of $20$19 billion.

Financial Covenants.  The credit facility contains covenants concerning allowable leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage. We are permitted to make borrowings and maintain amounts outstanding under the credit facility so long as our leverage ratio is not in excess of 7.25x, our unsecured coverage ratio is not less than 1.75x and our fixed charge coverage ratio is not less than 1.25x. The financial covenants for the credit facility do not apply when there are no borrowings under the credit facility. Hence, so long as there are no amounts outstanding thereunder and the term loan isloans are repaid, we would not be in default if we do not satisfy the financial covenants and we do not lose the potential to draw under the revolver portion of the credit facility in the future if we were ever to regain compliance with the financial covenants. These calculations are performed based on pro forma results for the prior four fiscal quarters, giving effect to transactions such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Under the terms of the credit facility, interest expense excludes items such as the gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt, deferred financing charges related to the senior notes or the credit facility, amortization of debt premiums or discounts that were recorded at issuance of a loan in order to establish its fair value and non-cash interest expense due to the implementation in 2009 of accounting standards relating to our exchangeable debentures, all of which are included in interest expense on our consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, total debt used in the calculation of our leverage ratio is based on a “net debt” concept, underpursuant to which cash and cash equivalents in excess of $100 million are deducted from our total debt balance.

We are in compliance with all of our financial covenants under the credit facility. The following table summarizes the financial tests contained in the credit facility as of December 31, 2013:2016:

Covenant Requirement

 

 

Actual Ratio

 

Covenant Requirement

for all years

Leverage ratio

 

3.2x

2.4

x

 

Maximum ratio of 7.25x

Fixed charge coverage ratio

 

4.3x

7.8

x

 

Minimum ratio of 1.25x

Unsecured interest coverage ratio (1)

 

6.6x

10.9

x

 

Minimum ratio of 1.75x

___________

 


(1)

If at any time our leverage ratio is above 7.0x, our minimum unsecured interest coverage ratio will be reduced to 1.5x.

Interest and Fees. We pay interest on revolver borrowings under the credit facility at floating rates equal to LIBOR plus a margin. In 2013 and prior years, theThe margin rangedranges from 17587.5 to 275 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s consolidated leverage ratio). On and after January 24, 2014, the date on which Host L.P. elected ratings-based pricing, the margin will range from 100 to 160155 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). We also pay a facility fee ranging from 1512.5 to 4030 basis points, depending on our rating and regardless of usage. Based on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating as of January 24, 2014,December 31, 2016, we will beare able to borrow at a rate of LIBOR plus 125100 basis points and pay a facility fee of 2520 basis points. Interest on the term loans consists of floating rates equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 90 to 175 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). Based on Host L.P.’s long-term debt rating as of December 31, 2016, our applicable margin on LIBOR loans under the 2014 Term Loan is 112.5 basis points. Our applicable margin on the 2015 Term Loan for LIBOR loans is 110 basis points.

Other Covenants and Events of Default. The credit facility contains restrictive covenants on customary matters. Certain covenants are less restrictiverestrictive at any time that our leverage ratio is below 6.0x, as currently is the case. In particular, at any time that our leverage ratio is below 6.0x, we will not be subject to limitations on capital expenditures, and the limitations on acquisitions, investments, dividends and distributions contained in the credit facility will be superseded by the generally less restrictive corresponding covenants in our senior notes indenture.indenture to the extent applicable, while our senior notes maintain an investment grade rating. Additionally, the credit facility’s restrictions on incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends and distributions generally are consistent with our senior notes indenture. These provisions, under certain circumstances, limit debt incurrence to debt incurred under the credit facility or in connection with a refinancing, and limit dividend payments to those necessary to maintain Host Inc.’s tax status as a REIT.

The credit facility also includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature, and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, payment of all amounts due under the credit facility may be accelerated and the

65


lenders’ commitments may be terminated. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events of default, all amounts due under the credit facility automatically will automatically become due and payable and the lenders’ commitments automatically will terminate.

Mortgage and Other Debt. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had 12 hotels that weremortgage debt secured by mortgage debt; however, we expect to pay the $300 million mortgage debt on two of our properties that matures on March 1, 2014. Subsequent to the repayment, revenues from the secured properties accounted for 3%one hotel, which represents 1% of our total revenues in 2013. Substantially all2016. All of our mortgage debt is recourse solely to specific assets, except in instances of fraud, misapplication of funds and other customary recourse provisions. As of December 31, 2013,2016, secured debt represented approximately 15%2% of our total debt and our aggregate secured debt had an average interest rate of 4.1%3.4% and an average maturity of 3.1 years.less than one year.

The following table summarizes our outstanding debt and scheduled amortization and maturities related to mortgage and other debt as of December 31, 20132016 (in millions):

 

 

 

Balance as of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

Thereafter

 

Mortgage Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort and Spa, 4.75%, due 1/1/2024

 

$

150

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

150

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach Marriott Hotel and Spa, 3.25%, due 3/1/2014 (1)

 

 

301

 

 

 

301

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Zealand hotel portfolio, 6.65%, due 2/18/2016 (2)

 

 

87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hyatt Regency Reston, 3.27%, due 7/1/16 (3)

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf, 6.26%, due 11/23/2016 (4)

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage debt

 

 

709

 

 

 

301

 

 

 

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

Other Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philadelphia Airport Marriott industrial revenue bonds, 7¾%, due 12/1/2017

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Industrial revenue bonds and other (5)

 

 

46

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total other debt

 

 

86

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage and other debt

 

$

795

 

 

$

334

 

 

$

13

 

 

$

258

 

 

$

40

 

 

$

 

 

$

150

 

 

 

Balance as of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

Thereafter

 

Mortgage Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf, 3.4%, due

     11/22/2017 (1)

 

$

62

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Capital leases

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage debt

 

$

63

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

During 2009, we entered into three interest rate swap agreements for the total notional amount outstanding on this loan. The rate shown reflects the weighted average interest rate in effect at December 31, 2013. The balance reflects the book value at December 31, 2013, as adjusted, due to the implementation of fair value hedge accounting. The face amount at December 31, 2013 was $300 million.  

(2)

The floating interest rate is equal to the 3-month New Zealand Bank Bill Rate plus 120 basis points plus an additional commitment fee of 120 basis points per annum. In addition, we entered into a swap agreement that fixes 75% of the loan at an all-in rate of 7.15%. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2013.

(3)

This floating rate mortgage is based on LIBOR plus 310 basis points. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2013.

(4)

The floating interest rate is equal to the 3-month BBSY plus 230 basis points. In addition, we entered into separate swap agreements that fix 75% of the loan at an all-in rate of 6.7% and cap the remaining 25% at an all-in interest rate of 9.9%. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2013.

(5)

Industrial revenue bonds and other consist of loans with an average interest rate of 7.0% that mature through 2016, and capital leases with varying interest rates and maturity dates.2016.  

Mortgage Debt of Consolidated and Unconsolidated Partner Interests. For the entities that we consolidate in our financial statements that have third party non-controllingnon-controlling partnership interests, the portion of mortgage debt included in the above table that is attributable to the non-controlling interests, based on their percentage of ownership of the ventures, is approximately $93$16 million. Additionally, we have non-controlling interests in partnerships and joint ventures that are not consolidated and are accounted for under the equity method. The portion of the mortgage and other debt of these partnerships and joint ventures attributable to us, based on our ownership percentage of ownership thereof, was $500$392 million at December 31, 2013. This debt balance primarily is attributable to our approximate one-third ownership interest in the Euro JV.2016. The mortgage debt related to the hotels owned by our Euro JV contains operating covenants that could result in the joint venture being required to escrow cash from operations or to make principal repaymentspayments without penalty. The debt of our European and Asia/Pacificunconsolidated joint ventures, with the exception of the Maui timeshare joint venture, is non-recourse to us and weus. We have jointly and severally guaranteed a construction loansloan incurred by our Maui timeshare and Hyatt Place Nashville joint ventures.venture. See “—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations.”

Distribution/Dividend Policy.. Host Inc.’s policy on common dividends generally is required to distribute, over time, at least 90%100% of its annual taxable income, excluding net capital gain,which primarily is dependent on our results of operations, as well as gains and losses on property sales. Host Inc. paid a


regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share and a special cash dividend of $0.05 per share on its common stock on January 17, 2017 to stockholders of record as of December 30, 2016. The $0.20 per share dividend represents Host Inc.’s intended regular quarterly cash dividend for the next several quarters, subject to Board approval. While Host Inc. intends to use available cash predominantly for acquisitions or other investments in its stockholders in orderportfolio, to maintain its qualification as a REIT, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax

66


purposes but with regard to whichthe extent that we do not receive cash. identify appropriate investments, we may elect in the future, subject to market conditions, to use available cash for other purposes, such as common stock repurchases or increased dividends, which dividends could be in excess of taxable income. Any special dividend would be subject to approval by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.  

Funds used by Host Inc. to pay dividends are provided through distributions from Host L.P. As of December 31, 2013,2016, Host Inc. is the owner of approximately 98.7%99% of Host L.P.’s common OP units. The remaining common OP units are owned by various unaffiliated limited partners. Each OP unit may be offered for redemption by the holders thereof for cash or, at the election of Host Inc., Host Inc. common stock based on the then current conversion ratio. The current conversion ratio was adjusted from 1.0 tois 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock for each OP unit as a result of Host Inc.’s special dividend in 2009, 90% of which was paid in shares of Host Inc. common stock. This adjustment was made to avoid any unintended dilution to the OP unitholders as a result of the portion of Host Inc.’s 2009 special dividend paid in common stock to its stockholders.unit.

Investors should take into account the 1.3%1% non-controlling position of Host L.P. OP units when analyzing dividend payments by Host Inc. to its stockholders, as these holders of OP units share, on a pro rata basis, in amounts being distributed by Host L.P. to holders of its corresponding OP units. For example, if Host Inc. paid a $1 per share dividend on its common stock, it would be based on the payment of a $1.021494 per common unit distribution by Host L.P. to Host Inc., as well as to the other common OP unitholders.

During 2013, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.46 per share (beginning in the first quarter at $0.10 per share and increasing by $0.01 per share each quarter thereafter) on Host Inc.’s common stock. Accordingly, Host L.P. made a distribution of $0.4698872 per unit on its common OP units. Host Inc.’s policy on common dividends generally is to distribute, over time, 100% of its taxable income. On February 18, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share on its common stock. The dividend will be paid on April 15, 2014 to stockholders of record on March 31, 2014. The amount of any future dividend will be determined by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We are party to various transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements with unconsolidated entities (which we refer to as “off-balance sheet arrangements”), pursuant to which we have certain contingent liabilitiesliabilities and/or guarantees. Contingencies included on our balance sheet are discussed in Part II Item 8. “Financial Statements and guarantees.Supplementary Data – Note 16. “Guarantees and Contingencies.” As of December 31, 2013,2016, we are party to the following material off-balance sheet arrangements:

European Joint Venture. The Euro JV consists of two separate funds, with our partners being APG Strategic Real Estate Pool NV, an affiliate of a Dutch Pension Fund, and Jasmine Hotels Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (“GIC RE”).RE. We serve as the general partner for the joint venture and have a combined general and limited partner interest of 32.1% ofwith respect to Euro JV Fund I and 33.4% ofwith respect to Euro JV Fund II. Due to the ownership structure and substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partners, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditures budgets, the Euro JV is not consolidated in our financial statements. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the book value of the total assets of the Euro JV are approximately €1.9 billion ($2.6 billion).€1.5 billion.

67


Our investment and partners’ funding as of December 31, 20132016 is as follows:

 

Host’s Net Investment

 

 

Total Partner Funding

 

 

Host's Net Investment

 

 

Total Partner Funding

 

 

Euros

(in millions)

 

 

US$

(in millions)

 

 

Euros

(in millions)

 

% of Total Commitment

 

 

Euros

(in millions)

 

 

US$

(in millions)

 

 

Euros

(in millions)

 

 

% of Total Commitment

 

Euro JV Fund I

146

 

$

201

 

631

 

91%

 

 

122

 

 

$

128

 

 

463

 

 

67%(1)

 

Euro JV Fund II

 

125

 

 

173

 

 

369

 

82%

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

301

 

 

 

                67%

 

Euro JV

271

 

$

374

 

1,000

 

 

216

 

 

$

227

 

 

764

 

 

 

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The remaining commitment is limited to investments in the current portfolio of hotels, including capital expenditures and debt repayments.

The partners expect to utilizeIn June 2016, the remaining commitment for Euro JV Fund I for capital expenditures and financing needs. During 2013, the Euro JVII partners executed an amendment ofamended the Euro JV partnership agreement in order to provide the funds necessary for a €95 million principal reduction associated with the extension of a mortgage loan secured by a portfolio of six properties, as well as to provide funds for general joint venture purposes and to extend the equity commitment period for Euro JV Fund II to June 27, 2017. The commitment period of Euro JV Fund I tofor acquisitions expired in December 2015. The Euro JV partners executed an additional amendment of the Euro JV partnership agreement in order to extend the commitment period of Euro JV Fund II by one year to June 2014 through the exercise of the extension option. As asset manager of the Euro JV funds, we earn an asset management fee based on the amount of equity commitments and equity invested, which in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011 were2014 aggregated approximately $15$8 million, $13$11 million and $11$16 million, respectively.


The following table sets forth operating statistics for the Euro JV comparable hotels as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012:2015:

 

 

 

Comparable Euro JV Hotels in Constant Euros (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2012 to 2013

 

Average room rate

 

192.70

 

192.67

 

 

%

Average occupancy

 

 

77.0

%

 

75.6

%

 

1.4 pts.

 

RevPAR

 

148.45

 

145.75

 

 

1.9

%

 

 

 

Comparable Euro JV Hotels in Constant Euros (1)

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Change

 

Average room rate

 

213.47

 

 

206.18

 

 

 

3.5

%

Average occupancy

 

 

73.7

%

 

 

77.9

%

 

 

(420

bps)

RevPAR

 

157.30

 

 

160.55

 

 

 

(2.0

)%

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The presentation above includes the operating performance for the 12all 10 properties consisting of 3,547 rooms in the joint venture with comparable results. The table excludes the five hotels acquired in 2012 as the joint venture did not own the hotels for the entiretyconsisting of 2012 and the Sheraton Stockholm hotel, as it was acquired in 2013. The table also excludes one hotel that was under extensive renovations in 2012.3,896 rooms. See “-Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics.”

The operating statistics of the hotels are presented in constant Euros, the functional currency of the Euro JV, in order to present the results of the hotels without the effects of foreign currency exchange rates. The functional currency of the hotels owned in the United Kingdom and Poland areSweden is the British pound sterling and the Polish zloty,Swedish krona, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, RevPAR in constant Euros for the Euro JV increased 1.9% for our comparable hotels, as average occupancy increased 140 basis points, and average room rate was flat. The Euro JV hotels in Belgium, The Netherlands and Italy experienced strong increases in RevPAR, as the Euro Zone saw modest improvements in economic growth and these hotels benefited from increased demand. The majority of the portfolio, especially2016, the Euro JV’s hotelscomparable hotel RevPAR in the United Kingdomconstant euros decreased by 2.0%, which resulted in a decrease of total revenues of 1.4%.

For 2016, 2015 and Warsaw, was affected negatively by a decline in average room rates, due to a shift in demand to lower-rated discount transient and contract group segments.

For 2013, 2012 and 20112014, our portion of the earnings (losses) of the Euro JV were $(12)was €7 million $4($8 million), €51 million ($57 million) and $4€17 million ($21 million), respectively, and areis included in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates on our consolidated statements of operations. The lossearnings in 2013 includes our portion2015 and 2014 include €39 million ($43 million) and €3 million ($4 million) recognized on the sale of a €33 million ($46 million) impairment expense related to the Sheraton Roma Hotel & Conference Center. The Euro JV assesses impairment of real estate nine properties based on whether estimated undiscounted future cash flows from each individualand one property, are less than its carrying value. If a property is impaired, an expense is recorded for the difference between the fair value and the net carrying value of the hotel. We also reviewed our investment in the Euro JV for other-than-temporary impairment and determined that no additional impairment expense was considered necessary.respectively,

Cash flows from operating activities of the Euro JV were €36€62 million, €35€78 million and €14€69 million for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. To date, the Euro JV has not made distributions to its partners, and has instead usedFuture cash flows from operations along with contributions from the partners,primarily are expected to continue to be used to invest in the portfolio through capital expenditures, projects and to fund other investments. investments or distributions to partners.

During 2013, 2012 and 2011,2016, the Euro JV distributed €47 million to its partners, of which Host’s share was €15 million ($18 million). The 2016 distributions were funded with the above mentioned cash from operations. During 2015, the Euro JV distributed €328.5 million to its partners, of which Host’s share was €107 million ($115 million). Ninety-two percent of the 2015 distributions were funded by proceeds from the hotel dispositions described below, while the remainder was funded with cash from operations. The Euro JV invested approximately €32€23 million €29in both 2016 and 2015 and €21 million and €27 million, respectively,in 2014, in capital expenditures projects. The Euro JV expects to spend between €30€20 million and €35€30 million on capital expenditures in 2014,2017, none of which capital expenditures are expected to require additional partner contributions.  

On August 29, 2013, Euro JV Fund II acquired the 465-room Sheraton Stockholm Hotel, Sweden, for approximately €102 million ($135 million). In connection with the acquisition,During 2015, the Euro JV entered into a €61sold nine properties for €526 million ($81 million)and repaid €229 million of mortgage loan with an interest rate of 5.67% that matures in 2018. We contributed approximately €14 million ($19 million)loans secured by the properties. Net proceeds from the hotel sales were distributed to the Euro JV in connection with this acquisition, funded through a draw on our credit facility.    partners and were used for other partnership investments.

68


On October 22, 2013, Euro JV Fund II sold the Courtyard Paris La Defense West – Colombes for €19 million ($26 million) plus certain customary closing adjustments and recognized a gain of approximately €1.7 million ($2.3 million). In connection with the sale, the Euro JV repaid the associated €10.4 million ($14.4 million) mortgage.    

The Euro JV has €989€707 million ($1,363 million) of mortgage debt, all of which is non-recourse to us. A default of the Euro JV mortgage debt does not trigger a default under any of our debt. On June 20, 2013,During 2016, the Euro JV refinanced acompleted amendments to two of its mortgage loan secured by six properties through a €95 million ($126 million) principal reductionagreements, extending their maturity and reducing the maturity date to 2016, with a one year extension option subject to meeting certain conditions. The loan has a fixed and floating rate component with an initialoverall weighted average interest rate of 4.5%. In connection with the refinancing, the joint venture reduced the outstanding principal amount of the mortgage loan to €242 million ($320 million). We funded our portion of the principal reduction, as well as certain closing costs and other funding requirements, through a €37 million ($48 million) draw on our credit facility. Additionally, during the year, the Euro JV extended its loan secured by the Crowne Plaza Hotel Amsterdam City Centre by two years, through its extension options, to 2015 and issued a new €17 million ($23 million) mortgage loan secured by the Le Méridien Grand Hotel Nuremberg that bears interest at three-month EURIBOR plus 275 bps and matures in 2016. A €70 million ($96 million) loan secured by three properties in Brussels matures in 2014. The Euro JV is in talks with lenders to refinance this loan, although no assurances can be made that it will be successful in refinancing this debt.  20 basis points.


The following presents our portion of the Euro JV debt maturities as of December 31, 2013:2016 (in USD):    

We have entered into fivefour foreign currency forward sale contracts in order to hedge the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in the Euro JV. The forward purchases will occur between May 20142017 and January 2016.2018. We have hedged €194 million€177 million (approximately $265$199 million) of our investment throughvia these contracts and have designated draws under our credit facility in Euros. For additional detail on the foreign currency forward sale contracts and our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, see Part II Item 7A. “—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture. We have a 25% interest in the Asia/Pacific JV with RECO Hotels JV Private Limited, an affiliate of GIC RE. The Asia/Pacific JV agreement may be terminated after a periodby either partner at any time, which would trigger the liquidation of seven years, which occurs in March of 2015.the JV. Due to the ownership structure and the substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partner, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditureexpenditures budgets, the Asia/Pacific JV is not consolidated in our financial statements. The commitment period for equity contributions to the Asia/Pacific JV expiredhas expired. Certain funding commitments remain, however, related to its existing investments in March 2012. We did not extend the commitment period beyond the expiration date; however, as we continue to invest in Asia, we may offer GIC RE opportunities to participate in certain acquisitions through the existing joint venture or through a new joint venture.India.

As of December 31, 2013, the Asia/Pacific JV owns one hotel in Australia and2016, the partners have invested approximately $73$103 million (of which our share was $18$26 million) in a separate joint venture in India with Accor S.A. and InterGlobe Enterprises Limited, in which the Asia/Pacific JV holds a 36% interest. ThisThis joint venture is developing sevenowns five operating properties in India,Delhi, Bangalore and Chennai and two additional properties in the final stages of completion in Chennai, totaling approximately 1,750 rooms, two of which opened in Bangalore in 2012 and five of which are under various stages of development in Chennai and Delhi.rooms. The hotels currently are and will be managed by AccorAccorHotels under the Pullman, ibis and Novotel brands.

On October 14, 2015, the Asia/Pacific JV sold the Four Points by Sheraton Perth for A$91.5 million and repaid A$43 million of mortgage debt. The JV recorded a gain on sale of approximately A$11 million ($8 million). During 2016, we received distributions of approximately $9 million from the Asia/Pacific JV primarily related to the sale of the Four Points by Sheraton Perth.

Maui Joint Venture. We have a 67% ownership interest in a joint venture with an affiliate of Hyatt ResidentialHV Global Group, (the “Maui JV”a subsidiary of Interval Leisure Group (“Interval”) to develop, sell and operate, that owns a 131-unit vacation ownership projectdevelopment in Maui, Hawaii adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa.

69


Spa (the “Maui JV”). Our ownership is a non-controlling interest as a result of the significant economic rights held by the HyattInterval member, whowhich also is the managing member. The total estimated development costs are $200Since 2012, we have contributed approximately $87 million to the Maui JV, which we expect will be funded with a $110includes the contribution of land valued at $36 million. As of December 31, 2016, approximately $9 million was outstanding on the joint venture’s construction loan, which is jointly and severally guaranteed by both partners,us and member contributions. As of December 31, 2013, $50.5 million was drawn on the construction loan. We anticipate that Host’s investment inHyatt Hotels Corporation. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Maui JV will be approximately $60recognized $55 million, which as$76 million and $54 million, respectively, of December 31, 2013 includes contributionssales of land valued at $36timeshare units.  We recognized earnings of $9 million, $8$11 million and $5 million in pre-formation expenditures2016, 2015 and additional capital contributions2014, respectively, which includes our portion of $3 million. Asthe net income of December 31, 2013, the book valuejoint venture as well as a portion of our investment in the Maui JV is $16 million. The project is expected to open in late 2014.deferred gain from the contribution of the land.

Hyatt Place Joint Venture. On November 12, 2013, we openedWe own a 50% interest in a joint venture with White Lodging Services that owns the 255-room Hyatt Place Nashville Downtown in Tennessee, which was developed for $43 million through aTennessee. In August 2016, the joint venture in which we are a 50% partner, with White Lodging Services. The joint venture has a $34.8refinanced its $31 million construction loan for this project, and as ofwith a new $60 million mortgage loan due August 2019 with two 12-month extension options. The loan bears interest at 1-month USD LIBOR plus 300 basis points, or 3.8%, at December 31, 2013, $23.6 million was drawn on this facility. Along with White Lodging Services, we have jointly and severally guaranteed the payment2016. Upon repayment of the construction loan, the partners were released of their


guarantee on such loan. We invested approximately $6 million for our investment inDuring 2016, the joint venture.venture also made distributions to its partners, of which we received $17 million. Due to the significant control rights of our partner, we do not consolidate the joint venture in our financial statements.

Harbor Beach Joint Venture. We own a 49.9% interest in a joint venture with R/V-C Association that owns the 650-room Fort Lauderdale Marriott Harbor Beach Resort & Spa in Florida. The joint venture has approximately $149 million of mortgage debt that is non-recourse to us. Due to significant control rights of our partner, we do not consolidate the joint venture in our financial statements. During 2016, we received approximately $6 million of distributions from the joint venture as a result of excess cash from operations.

For additional discussion on each of our joint venture investments, see Part II Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 3. “Investments in Affiliates.”

Contractual Obligations. The table below summarizes our obligations for principal and estimated interest payments on our debt, future minimum lease payments on our operating and capital leases, projected capital expenditures and other long-term liabilities, each as of December 31, 2016 (in millions):

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1 year

 

 

1 to 3 years

 

 

3 to 5 years

 

 

5 years

 

Long-term debt obligations (1)

 

$

4,475

 

 

$

693

 

 

$

455

 

 

$

1,025

 

 

$

2,302

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease obligations

 

 

1,461

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

1,264

 

Purchase obligations (2)

 

 

239

 

 

 

216

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities reflected on

     the balance sheet (3)

 

 

30

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

21

 

Total

 

$

6,206

 

 

$

956

 

 

$

557

 

 

$

1,106

 

 

$

3,587

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The amounts shown include amortization of principal, debt maturities and estimated interest payments. Interest payments have been reflected based on the weighted average interest rate.

(2)

Our only purchase obligations consist of commitments for capital expenditures at our hotels. Under our contracts, we have the ability to defer some of these expenditures into later years.

(3)

The amounts shown include deferred management fees, obligations to third-parties related to prior property transactions and the estimated amount of tax expense related to uncertain tax liabilities.

Tax Sharing Arrangements. Under tax sharing agreements with former affiliated companies (such as Marriott International, Inc., HMS Host and Barceló Crestline Corporation), we are obligated to pay certain taxes (federal, state, locallocal and foreign, including any related interest and penalties) relating to periods in which the companies were affiliated with us. For example, a taxing authority could adjust an item deducted by a former affiliate during the period that thissuch former affiliate was owned by us. This adjustment could produceresult in a tax liability that we may be obligated to pay under the tax sharing agreement. Additionally, under the partnership agreement between Host Inc. and Host L.P., Host L.P. is obligated to pay certain taxes (federal, state, local and foreign, including any related interest and penalties) incurred by Host Inc., as well as any liabilities the IRS may successfully assert against Host Inc. We do not expect any amounts paid under these tax sharing arrangements to be material.

Tax Indemnification Agreements. As a result of certain federal and state income tax considerations of the former owners of two hotels currently owned by Host L.P., we have agreed to restrictions on selling such hotels, or repaying or refinancingrefinancing the mortgage debt, for varying periods. One of these agreements expires in 2028 and the other in 2031.

Guarantees. We have entered into certain guarantees, which consist of commitments we have made to third parties for leases or debt, that are not recordedrecorded on our books due to various dispositions, spin-offs and contractual arrangements, but that we have agreed to pay in the event of certain circumstances, including default by an unrelated party. We consider the likelihood of any material payments under these guarantees to be remote. TheFor a discussion of the largest guarantees (by dollar amount) are listed below:

We remain contingently liable for rental payments on certain divested non-lodging properties. These primarily represent certain restaurants that were sold subject to our guarantee of the future rental payments. The aggregate amount of these future rental payments is approximately $17 million as of December 31, 2013.

In 1997, we owned Leisure Park Venture Limited Partnership, which currently owns and operates a senior living facility. We no longer have an ownership interest in the partnership, but remain obligated under a guarantee of interest and principal with respect to $14.7 million of municipal bonds issued by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority through their maturity in 2027. However, to the extent that we are required to make any payments under the guarantee, we have been indemnified by Barceló Crestline Corporation, who, in turn, is indemnified by the current owner of the facility.

In connection with the sale of two hotels in January 2005, we remain contingently liable for the amounts due under the respective ground leases. The future minimum lease payments are approximately $12 million through the full term of the leases, including renewal options. We believe that the likelihood of any liability arising related to these ground leases is remote and, in each case, we have been indemnified by the purchaser of the hotel.

see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 16. Guarantees and environmental liabilities that are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet include:Contingencies.”

In connection with the sale of the Atlanta Marriott Marquis in January 2013, we retained $5 million of contingent liabilities related to potential environmental liabilities.

In connection with the sale of The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco in June 2013, we recorded a deferred gain of approximately $11 million, the recognition of which is subject to performance guarantees through which we have guaranteed certain annual net operating profit levels for the hotel through 2016, with a maximum payment of $4 million per year, not to exceed $11 million in total.

70


Contractual Obligations. The table below summarizes our obligations for principal and estimated interest payments on our debt, future minimum lease payments on our operating and capital leases, projected capital expenditures and other long-term liabilities, each as of December 31, 2013 (in millions):

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More than

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1 year

 

 

1 to 3 years

 

 

3 to 5 years

 

 

5 years

 

Long-term debt obligations (1)

 

$

5,780

 

 

$

548

 

 

$

1,631

 

 

$

828

 

 

$

2,773

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease obligations

 

 

1,804

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

1,591

 

Purchase obligations (2)

 

 

403

 

 

 

359

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet (3)

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

Total

 

$

8,003

 

 

$

953

 

 

$

1,765

 

 

$

911

 

 

$

4,374

 

(1)

The amounts shown include amortization of principal, debt maturities and estimated interest payments. Interest payments have been included in this category based on the weighted average interest rate.

(2)

Our only purchase obligations consist of commitments for capital expenditures at our hotels. Under our contracts, we have the ability to defer some of these expenditures into later years.

(3)

The amounts shown include deferred management fees and the estimated amount of tax expense. Under terms of our management agreements, we have deferred payment of management fees to our hotel managers for some of our properties that have not achieved the required income thresholds for payment of owner’s priority to us. The timing of the payments, if any, is based on future operations, the termination of the management agreement or the sale of the hotel, and is, therefore, not determinable. The estimated amount of tax expense relates to uncertain tax liabilities from prior years.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments, including


those related to the impairment of long-lived assets, on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies are disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. TheFor a detailed discussion of the following represent certain critical accounting policies that require us to exercise our business judgment or make significant estimates.estimates see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:”

Hotels Acquired in a Business Combination. We record our investments in hotel properties based on the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at acquisition date. Combinations;

Property and equipment are recorded at fair valueEquipment – Impairment testing;

Property and allocated to buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment using appraisals and valuations performed by management and independent third parties. Fair values are based on the exit price (i.e. the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date). We evaluate several factors, including market data for similar assets, expected cash flows discounted at risk adjusted rates and replacement cost for the assets to determine an appropriate exit cost when evaluating the fair value of our assets.

Other items that we evaluate in a business combination include identifiable intangible assets, capital lease assets and obligations and goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets typically are assumed contracts, including ground and retail leases and management and franchise agreements, which are recorded at fair value. Above-market and below-market contract values are based on the present value of the difference between contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the contracts acquired and our estimate of the fair value of rates for corresponding contracts measured over the period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the contract. Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining non-cancelable term of the related agreements. Capital lease obligations that are assumed as part of the acquisition of a leasehold interest are measured at fair value and included as debt on the accompanying balance sheet and we record the corresponding right-to-use assets. Classification of a lease does not change if it is part of a business combination. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we may utilize a number of sources that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of a property and other market data, including third-party appraisals and valuations. In certain situations, a deferred tax liability may be created due to the difference between the fair value and the tax basis of the asset at the acquisition date. Any consideration paid in excess of the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired would be recorded to goodwill. In very limited circumstances, we may record a bargain purchase gain if the consideration paid is less than the net fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. Furthermore, acquisition-related costs, such as due diligence, legal and accounting fees, are not capitalized or applied in determining the fair value of the acquired assets.

71


Impairment Testing. We analyze our assets for impairment throughout the year when events or circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying values thereof may not be recoverable. We consider a property to be impaired when the sum of future undiscounted cash flows over our remaining estimated holding period is less than the carrying value of the asset. For impaired assets, we record an impairment charge equal to the excess of the property’s carrying value over its fair value. To the extent that a property has a substantial remaining estimated useful life and management does not believe that it is more likely than not the property will be disposed of prior to the end of its useful life, it would be unusual for undiscounted cash flows to be insufficient to recover the property’s carrying value. In the absence of other factors, we assume that the estimated life is equal to the GAAP depreciable life because of the continuous property maintenance and improvement capital expenditures required under our management agreements. We adjust our assumptions with respect to the remaining useful life of the property if situations dictate otherwise, such as an expiring ground lease, or that it is more likely than not that the asset will be sold prior to its previously expected useful life. We also consider the effect of regular renewal and replacement capital expenditures on the estimated life of our properties, including critical infrastructure, which regularly is maintained and then replaced at the end of its useful life.

We test for impairment in several situations, including when a property has a current or projected loss from operations, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, or when other events, trends, contingencies or changes in circumstances indicate that a triggering event has occurred and the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. In the evaluation of the impairment of our assets, we make many assumptions and estimates, including:

projected cash flows, both from operations and the eventual disposition;

expected useful life and holding period;

future required capital expenditures; and

fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates and comparable selling prices.

While we consider all of the above indicators as preliminary indicators to determine if the carrying value may not be recovered by undiscounted cash flows, we reviewed the actual year-to-date and the projected cash flows from operations in order to identify properties with actual or projected annual operating losses or minimal operating profit as of December 31, 2013. The projected cash flows consider items such as booking pace, occupancy, room rate and property-level operating costs. As a result of our review, we identified five properties that required further consideration of property and market specific conditions or factors to determine if the property was impaired using an undiscounted cash flow analysis. Management considered a range of RevPAR and operating margins compared to prior years’ operating results in evaluating the probability-weighted projected cash flows from operations. To appropriately evaluate if the carrying value of the assets was recoverable, we projected cash flows such that the individual properties would return to normalized levels of operations generally within five years and thereafter grow at a stabilized rate of approximately 3% over the remaining estimated lives of the properties. This stabilized growth rate is lower than the projected growth rate for the urban upper upscale properties, which we believe is most representative of our portfolio, over the period from 2013 through 2023. Based on this testing, four of the properties identified did not require further analysis. Based on additional testing, one property exhibited an impaired value at December 31, 2013. Management believes its assumptions and estimates reflect current market conditions. We recognized impairment expense in the aggregate amount of $1 million and $60 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively, based on a change in their estimated hold periods.

Equipment – Other-than-Temporary Impairment of an Investment. We review our equity method investments for other-than-temporary impairment based on the occurrence of any triggering events that would indicate that the carrying amount of the investment exceeds its fair value on an other-than-temporary basis. Triggering events can include a decline in distributable cash flows from the investment, a change in the expected hold period or other significant events which would decrease the value of the investment. Our investments primarily consist of joint ventures which own hotel properties; therefore, we generally will have few observable inputsInvestment;

Property and will determine the fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the investment, as well as considering the impact of other elements (i.e. control premiums, etc.). We use certain inputs, such as available third-party appraisals and forecast net operating income for the hotel properties, to estimate the expected cash flows. If an equity method investment is impaired, a loss is recorded for the difference between its fair value and its carrying value. Based on this test, no other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2013.

Equipment – Classification of Assets as “Held for Sale.” Our policy for the classification of a hotel as held for sale is intended to ensure that the sale of the asset is probable prior to classifying it as such, will be completed within one year and that actions required to complete the sale are unlikely to change or that it is unlikely the planned sale will not occur. This policy is consistent with our experience with real estate transactions under which the timing and final terms of a sale are frequently not known until purchase agreements are executed, the buyer has a significant deposit at risk and no financing contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner. Specifically, we typically will classify properties that we actively are marketing as held for sale when all of the following conditions are met:Sale”;

Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has approved the sale (to the extent that the dollar amount of the sale requires Board approval);

72


a binding agreement to sell the property has been signed;

the buyer has committed a significant amount of non-refundable cash; and

no significant contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner.

To the extent that a property is classified as held for sale and its fair value less selling costs is lower than the net book value of the property, we will record an impairment expense.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.Expense;

Derivative Instruments;

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation;

Foreign Currency Translation;  

Income Taxes – Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities. Additionally, see  “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 6. Income Taxes” for more information; and

Share based payments. Additionally, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 8. Employee Stock Plans” for more information.

Application of New Accounting Standards

In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board Depreciation expense(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The ASU amends the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities (VIEs) and general partners' investments in limited partnerships and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Specifically, as a result of the elimination of the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and that these partnerships should be evaluated under the VIE or Voting Interest model, we re-evaluated the VIE determination of our non-wholly-owned partnerships. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2016, and applied the changes retrospectively. As a result, we no longer consolidate the partnership that owns the Fort Lauderdale Marriott Harbor Beach Resort & Spa, of which we are the managing partner and hold 49.9% of the partnership interests, due to the voting rights of the third-party owner. Accordingly, the operations, assets and liabilities of the hotel no longer are included in our consolidated financial statements. Instead, we have included our interest in the hotel based on the estimated useful life ofcarrying amount on January 1, 2015 in advances to and investments in affiliates and our assets and amortization expense for leasehold improvements is based on the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the related assets. The lives of the assets are based on a number of assumptions, including cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish the assets, as well as specific market and economic conditions. While management believes its estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income (loss) or the gain or loss on the sale of any of our hotels.

Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets. We have approximately $113 million, net of a valuation allowance of $61 million, of net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2013. The objective of financial accounting and reporting standards for income taxes is to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in a company’s financial statements or tax returns. We have considered various factors, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies in determining a valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets, and we believe that it is more likely than not that we will be able to realize the $113 million of net deferred tax assets in the future. When a determination is made that all, or a portion of the deferred taxhotel’s earnings are recorded to equity in earnings of affiliates, with no cumulative-effect adjustment. As a result of the adoption of this ASU, total assets may not be realized, an increase inand total liabilities at December 31, 2015 were reduced by $128 million and $150 million, respectively. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, total revenues were reduced by $37 million and $33 million, respectively. Net income tax expense will be recorded in that period.

Valuationdecreased by $6 million for both years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The deconsolidation of Derivative Contracts. We occasionally will enter into derivative products, including interest rate and foreign currency swaps, caps and collars. Derivative instruments are subject to fair value reporting at each reporting date andthis entity had no effect on the increasetotal equity of Host Inc. stockholders, total Host L.P. capital or decrease in fair value is recorded in net income (loss)attributable to Host Inc. or other comprehensive income (loss), based onHost L.P.

Additionally, three partnerships now are considered VIE’s, as the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We estimate the fair value of these instruments through the use of third party valuations, which utilize the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future cash receipts and the discounted future expected cash payments. We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees. The variable cash flow streams are based on an expectation of future interest and exchange rates derived from observed market interest and exchange rate curves. The values of these instruments will change over time as cash receipts and payments are made and as market conditions change. Any event that impacts the level of actual and expected future interest or exchange rates will impact our valuations. The fair value of our derivatives likely will fluctuate from year-to-year based on changing levels of interest and exchange rates and shortening terms to maturity.

Stock Compensation. We recognize costs resulting from Host Inc.’s share-based payment transactions over their vesting periods. We classify share-based payment awards granted in exchange for employee services either as equity awards or liability awards. The classification of Host Inc.’s restricted stock awards either as an equity award or a liability award is based upon cash settlement options. Equity classified awards are measured based on the fair value on the date of grant. Liability classified awards are remeasured to fair value each reporting period. Awards are classified as liability awards to the extent that settlement features allow the recipient to have a percentage of the restricted stock awards withheld to meet tax withholding requirements. The value of these restricted stock awards, less estimated forfeitures, is recognizedgeneral partner maintains control over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award – the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for awards for which employees do not render the requisite services.

On January 20, 2012, the Compensation Policy Committee of the Board of Directors adopted a new annual compensation plan for senior management (the “Annual Plan”), that replaces the expired three-year plan (2009-2011) 2009 compensation program. The key components of the Annual Plan include the following awards:

Restricted stock awards with vesting based on market conditions. These awards vest based on the total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative to (i) the NAREIT Index, (ii) the S&P Index, and (iii) a Selected Lodging Company Index that serves as a relevant industry/asset specific measurement to our competitors. U.S. based senior management may elect to have amounts withheld for taxes in excess of minimum statutory tax requirements, and, as result, TSR awards granted to these employees are classified as liability awards and are remeasured to fair value each reporting period. In contrast, senior management located outside of the U.S. are limited as to the amount of shares they may use for statutory tax requirements, and, as result, TSR awards granted to these employees are classified as equity awards and are recorded at fair value as of the grant date. The valuation of these awards is a custom calculation that is based on common valuation techniques such as the lattice,

73


Binomial and Black-Scholes valuation methodologies. The utilization of this model requires us to make certain estimates related to the volatility of the share price of Host Inc.’s common stock, risk-free interest rates, actual TSR from the beginning of the performance period through the measurement date, and Host Inc.’s stock beta as compared to the average risk of the peer groups.

Restricted stock awards with vesting based on performance conditions. These awards are earned based on achieving a specified performance target, which will be based on the employee’s and the company’s specific management business objectives for the performance year. Compensation cost will be recognized when the achievement of the performance condition is considered probable. If a performance condition has more than one outcome that is probable, recognition of compensation cost will be based on the condition that is the most likely outcome. For U.S. based senior management, these awards are classified as liability awards due to their cash settlement provisions. Therefore, the value of the shares to be issued by Host Inc. will be based on Host Inc.’s share price on the reporting date.

Stock option awards. The stock option awards are equity classified awards, as they do not include cash settlement features. Therefore, the value of the award is determined on the grant date using a binomial pricing model and is not adjusted for future changes in fair value. Vesting for these awards is based on service conditions. The utilization of the binomial model requires us to make certain estimates related to the volatility of the share price of our common stock, risk-free interest rates and the amount of our awards expected to be forfeited, and our expected dividend yield.

On February 6, 2013, Host Inc. granted senior management 1.7 million restricted shares for performance year 2013 (which amount represents the maximum number of shares that can be earned during the year if performance is at the “high” level of achievement). Vesting of these shares is subject to meeting the performance measures outlined above. Approximately 50% of the restricted shares granted are market-based, with the remaining performance-based. In addition, Host Inc. awarded approximately 0.4 million stock options with an exercise price of $16.55 per share for performance year 2013. During 2013, we recorded approximately $18 million of stock compensation expense associated with the 2013 grant.

Consolidation Policies. Judgment is required with respect to the consolidation of partnership and joint venture entities in terms of the evaluation of control, including assessment of the importance of rights and privileges of the partners based on voting rights, as well as financial interests that are not controllable through voting interests. We consolidate subsidiaries when we have the ability to direct the activitiesdecisions that most significantly impact the economic performancepartnerships; however, this consideration did not change the consolidation determination.  This conclusion includes the operating partnership, Host L.P., which is consolidated by Host Inc., of which Host Inc. is the general partner and holds 99% of the subsidiary. Forlimited partner interests. Host Inc.’s sole significant asset is its investment in Host L.P. and, consequently, substantially all of Host Inc.’s assets and liabilities represent assets and liabilities of Host L.P. All of Host Inc.’s debt is an obligation of Host L.P. and may be settled only with assets of Host L.P. We also determined that our consolidated partnership that owns the majority of our hotel and real estate investments, we consider those rights to be (i) approval or amendment of developments plans, (ii) financing decisions, (iii) approval or amendments of operating budgets, and (iv) investment strategy decisions. For those partnerships and joint venturesHouston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental, of which we are the general partner and hold 85% of the partnership interests, is a VIE. The total assets of this VIE at December 31, 2016 are $60 million and consist of cash and property and equipment. Liabilities for the VIE total $3 million and consist of accounts payable and deferred revenue. The unconsolidated partnership that owns the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, of which we review the rightshold 11% of the limited partnerspartner interests, also is a VIE. The carrying amount of this investment at December 31, 2016 is $(6) million and is included in advances to and investments in affiliates. The mortgage debt held by this VIE is non-recourse to us.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The new standard sets forth steps to determine the timing and amount of revenue to be recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects in exchange. In March, April, May and December 2016, the FASB issued ASUs


Nos. 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-20, respectively, all related to Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which further clarify the application of the standard.In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effectiveness of ASU No. 2014-09 to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and permitted early application for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The new standards can be applied retrospectively or under a modified retrospective approach. Based on our assessment of this standard, it will not materially affect the amount or timing of revenue recognition for revenues from room, food and beverage, and other hotel level sales; however, it may allow for earlier gain recognition for certain sale transactions under which we have continuing involvement. Upon adoption, we expect to implement these standards using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect recognized and no prior period restatements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which affects aspects of accounting for lease agreements. Under the new standard, all leases, including operating leases, will require recognition of the lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees on the balance sheet. However, the effect on the statement of operations and the statement of cash flows largely is unchanged. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early application permitted. The standard requires a modified retrospective approach, with restatement of the periods presented in the year of adoption. The primary impact of the new standard will be to the treatment of our 26 ground leases, which represent approximately 85% of all of our operating lease payments. While we have not completed our analysis, we believe that the application of this standard will result in the recording of a right of use asset and the related lease liability of between $400 million and $500 million for the ground leases, although changes in discount rates, ground lease terms or other variables may have a significant effect on this calculation. As noted above, we expect that the adoption of this standard will have minimal impact on our income statement.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to simplify accounting for share-based payment transactions and will affect the classification of certain share-based awards and related income tax withholdings. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. As a result of the standard, we anticipate that the majority of our share-based payment awards granted in 2017 will be deemed equity-classified awards, and the excess tax benefits or deficiencies that are incurred based on the difference between the intrinsic value of the award and the grant-date fair value will be recognized as income tax expense or benefit on the income statement. However, we do not anticipate that the implementation of this standard will have a material effect on our financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which requires that, on the statement of cash flows, amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending total amounts thereof. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash and furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund on our consolidated balance sheet will be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. These amounts totaled $175 million and $156 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change our balance sheet presentation. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We plan to adopt this standard beginning January 1, 2017.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The standard adopts a two-step approach, wherein, if those rightssubstantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single (group of similar) identifiable asset(s), then the transaction would precludebe considered an asset purchase. As a result of the presumptionstandard, we anticipate that the majority of controlour hotel purchases will be considered asset purchases as opposed to business combinations, although the determination will be made on a transaction-by-transaction basis. This standard will be applied on a prospective basis and, therefore, it does not affect the accounting for any of our previous transactions. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted.

Our Customers

Our customers fall into three broad groups: transient business, group business and contract business. Similar to the majority of the lodging industry, we further categorize business within these broad groups based on characteristics they have in common as follows:

Transient business broadly represents individual business or leisure travelers. Business travelers make up the majority of transient demand at our hotels. Therefore, we will be significantly more affected by trends in business travel than trends in leisure demand. The four key subcategories of the transient business group are:

Retail: This is the benchmark rate that a hotel publishes and offers to the general partner. Limited partner rightspublic. It typically is the rate charged to travelers that do not have access to negotiated or discounted rates. It includes the “rack rate,” which would preclude presumption of control bytypically is applied to rooms during high demand periods and is the general partner include the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove us, as the general partner, without causehighest rate category available. Retail room rates will fluctuate more freely depending on anticipated demand levels (e.g. seasonality and substantive participating rights, primarily through voting rights.weekday vs. weekend stays).  


Non-Qualified Discount: These include special rates offered by the hotels, including packages, advance-purchase discounts and promotional offers.  These also include rooms booked through online travel agencies (OTAs).  

We also evaluate our subsidiaries to determine if they should be considered variable interest entities (“VIEs”). If a subsidiarySpecial Corporate: This is a VIE, it is subjectnegotiated rate offered to companies and organizations that provide significant levels of room night demand to the consolidation framework specifically for VIEs. We consider an entityhotel or to hotel brands generally. These rates typically are negotiated annually at a VIE if equity investors own an interest therein that does not havediscount to the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or if such investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. We review our subsidiaries and affiliates annually to determine if (i) they should be considered VIEs, and (ii) whether we should change our consolidation determination based on changes in their characteristics.

Foreign Currency Translation. The operations of international subsidiaries are maintained in their functional currency, which generally is the local currency, and are translated to U.S. dollars using the average exchangeanticipated retail rate.  In addition, this category includes rates for the period. The assets and liabilities are translated to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effectoffered at the balance sheet date.prevailing per diem for approved government travel.

Qualified Discount: This category encompasses all discount programs, such as AAA and AARP discounts, rooms booked through wholesale channels, frequent guest program redemptions, and promotional rates and packages offered by a hotel.

Group business represents clusters of guestrooms booked together, usually with a minimum of 10 rooms. The resulting translation adjustments are reflected in other comprehensive income (loss).

Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the functional currency of each entity using the exchange rates prevailing at the datesthree key sub-categories of the transactions. Assetsgroup business category are:

Association: group business related to national and liabilities denominatedregional association meetings and conventions.

Corporate: group business related to corporate meetings (e.g., product launches, training programs, contract negotiations, and presentations).

Other: group business predominately related to social, military, education, religious, fraternal and youth and amateur sports teams, otherwise known as SMERF business.

Contract business refers to blocks of rooms sold to a specific company for an extended period of time at significantly discounted rates. Airline crews are typical generators of contract demand for our airport hotels. Additionally, contract rates may be utilized by hotels that are located in foreign currenciesmarkets that are remeasured at period end exchange rates. The resulting exchange differences are recorded in gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives, except when recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) as qualifying net investment hedges.experiencing consistently lower levels of demand.

74


Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics

To facilitate a year-to-year comparison of our operations, we present certain operating statistics (i.e., RevPAR, average daily rate and average occupancy) and operating results (revenues, expenses, adjusted operating profithotel EBITDA and associated margins) for the periods included in this report on a comparable hotel basis. basis to enable our investors to better evaluate our operating performance.

Because these statistics and operating results relate only to our hotel properties, they exclude results for our non-hotel properties and other real estate investments. We define our comparable hotels as properties:

(i)

that are owned or leased by us and the operations of which are included in our consolidated results, whether as continuing operations or discontinued operations, for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared; and

(ii)

that have not sustained substantial property damage or business interruption, or undergone large-scale capital projects (as further defined below) during the reporting periods being compared.

The hotel business is capital-intensive and renovations are a regular part of the business. Generally, hotels under renovation remain comparable hotels. A large scale capital project that would cause a hotel to be excluded from our comparable hotel set is an extensive renovation of several core aspectsaspects of the hotel, such as rooms, meeting space, lobby, bars, restaurants and other public spaces. Both quantitative and qualitative factors are taken into consideration in determining if the renovation would cause a hotel to be removed from the comparable hotel set, including unusual or exceptional circumstances such as: a reduction or increase in room count, rebranding, a significant alteration of the business operations, or the closing of the hotel during the renovation.

We do not include an acquired hotel in our comparable hotel set until the operating results for that hotel have been included in our consolidated results for one full calendar year. For example, we acquired the Grand Hyatt WashingtonThe Don CeSar in July 2012.February 2017. The hotel waswill not be included in our comparable hotelshotel set until January 1, 2014.2019. Hotels that we sell are excluded from the comparable hotel set once the transaction has closed. Similarly, hotels are excluded from our comparable hotel set from the date that they sustain substantial property damage or business interruption or commence a large-scale capital project. In each case, these hotels are returned to the comparable hotel set when the operations of the hotel have been included in our consolidated results for one full calendar year after completion of the repair of the property damage or cessation of the business interruption, or the completion of large-scale capital projects, as applicable.

Of the 11596 hotels that we owned on December 31, 2013, 1052016, 88 have been classified as comparable hotels. The operating results of the following hotels that we owned or leased as of December 31, 20132016 are excluded from comparable hotel results for these periods:

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples, removed in the third quarter of 2013 (business interruption due to the closure of the hotel during extensive renovations, which included renovations of 450 rooms, including 35 suites, restaurant, façade and windows);

The Denver Marriott Tech Center, removed in the first quarter of 2016 (business disruption due to extensive renovations, including conversion of 64 rooms to 41 suites, conversion of the concierge lounge into three meeting rooms, and the repositioning of the public space and food and beverage areas);


Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach (acquired in May 2013);

GrandThe Hyatt Washington (acquired in July 2012);

The Westin New York Grand Central (business interruption due to re-branding of the hotel and extensive renovations that were substantially completed by December 2012, including the renovation of 774 guest rooms, lobby, public and meeting spaces, fitness center, restaurant and bar);

Two hotels in Christchurch, New Zealand (business interruption due to the closure of the hotels following an earthquake in February 2011 and the subsequent extensive renovations, which hotels reopened August 2013 and September 2012);

Orlando World Center Marriott, removed in the third quarter of 2012 (business interruption due to extensive renovations, which included façade restoration, the shutdown of the main pool and a complete restoration and enhancement of the hotel, including new water slides and activity areas, new pool dining facilities and the renovation of one tower of guestrooms, meeting space and restaurants);

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center, removed in the third quarter of 2011 (business interruption due to extensive renovations that were completed in April 2012, including renovation of the guest rooms, lobby, bar and restaurant and the demolition of one tower of the hotel);

Chicago Marriott O’Hare, removed in the third quarter of 2011 (business interruption due to extensive renovations that were completed in April 2012, including renovating every aspect of the hotel and shutting down over 200 rooms); and

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing,Regency San Francisco Airport, removed in the first quarter of 20112016 (business interruptiondisruption due to extensive renovations, that were completed in January 2013, including all guestrooms and bathrooms, meeting space, the repositioning of the atrium into a new restaurant and lounge, and conversion of one tower of the hotel into apartments, reducing the room count, and the renovation of the remaining guest rooms, lobby, bar andexisting restaurant to additional meeting space).;

The Camby Hotel (previously The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix), removed in the third quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to rebranding, including closure of the hotel in July 2015 for extensive renovation work);

The Logan (previously the Four Seasons Philadelphia), removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to rebranding, including closure of the hotel in order to expedite renovation efforts);

Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental, removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to complete repositioning of the hotel, including guest room renovations and the closure of two restaurants to create a new food and beverage outlet and lobby experience);

Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina, removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to the demolition of the existing conference center and new exhibit hall);

The Phoenician (acquired in June 2015 and, beginning in second quarter 2016, business disruption due to extensive renovations, including all guestrooms and suites, a redesign of the lobby and public areas, renovation of pools, recreation areas and a restaurant and a re-configured spa and fitness center); and

Axiom Hotel (acquired as the Powell Hotel in January 2014, then closed during 2015 for extensive renovations and reopened in January 2016).

The operating results of eight18 hotels disposed of in 20132016 and 20122015 are not included in comparable hotel results for the periods presented herein. In 2017, the following hotels will be excluded from our comparable hotel results because they have undergone large-scale capital projects during the comparable periods reported: the Denver Marriott Tech Center; the Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport; Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina; The Phoenician; and Axiom Hotel. We also will exclude the JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa, which we sold in January, and the Don CeSar, which we acquired in February, along with any hotels acquired or sold during 2017.

75As of December 31, 2015, 95 of our 106 hotels were classified as comparable. The operating results of the following hotels that we owned as of December 31, 2015 are excluded from comparable hotel results for these periods:


Novotel Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico and ibis Rio de Janeiro Parque Olimpico (opened in the fourth quarter of 2014);

The Phoenician (acquired in June 2015);

YVE Hotel Miami (acquired as the b2 miami downtown hotel in August 2014);

Axiom Hotel (acquired as the Powell Hotel in January 2014);

The Camby Hotel (previously The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix), removed in the third quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to rebranding, including closure of the hotel in July 2015 for extensive renovation work);

Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center and San Cristobal Tower, Santiago, removed in the second quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to extensive guestroom renovation and reconfiguration, which requires temporary closure of a significant portion of the guestrooms);

The Logan (previously the Four Seasons Philadelphia), removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to rebranding, including closure of the hotel in order to expedite renovation efforts);

Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental, removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to complete repositioning of the hotel, including guest room renovations and the closure of two restaurants to create a new food and beverage outlet and lobby experience); and

Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina, removed in the first quarter of 2015 (business interruption due to the demolition of the existing conference center and new exhibit hall).  

We evaluate the operating performance of our comparable hotels based on both market and property type. These divisions are generally consistent with groupings recognized in the lodging industry.

Our markets consist of the following:

Domestic

Boston –Greater Boston Metropolitan area;

Boston –Greater Boston Metropolitan area;


New York – Greater New York Metropolitan area, including northern New Jersey;

Philadelphia – Philadelphia Metropolitan area;

Washington D.C. – Metropolitan area, including the Maryland and Virginia suburbs;

Washington D.C. – Metropolitan area, including the Maryland and Virginia suburbs;

Atlanta – Atlanta Metropolitan area;

Atlanta – Atlanta Metropolitan area;

Florida – All Florida locations;

Florida – All Florida locations;

Chicago – Chicago Metropolitan area;

Chicago – Chicago Metropolitan area;

Denver – Denver Metropolitan area;

Denver – Denver Metropolitan area;

Houston – Houston Metropolitan area;

Houston – Houston Metropolitan area;

Phoenix – Phoenix Metropolitan area, including Scottsdale;

Phoenix – Phoenix Metropolitan area, including Scottsdale;

Seattle – Seattle Metropolitan area;

Seattle – Seattle Metropolitan area;

San Francisco – Greater San Francisco Metropolitan area, including San Jose;

San Francisco – Greater San Francisco Metropolitan area, including San Jose;

Los Angeles – Greater Los Angeles area, including Orange County;

Los Angeles – Greater Los Angeles area, including Orange County;

San Diego –San Diego Metropolitan area;

San Diego –San Diego Metropolitan area;

Hawaii – All Hawaii locations; and

Other – Select cities in California, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas.

Hawaii – All Hawaii locations;

Other – Select cities in California, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, and Texas;

International

Asia-Pacific –Australia and New Zealand;

Asia-Pacific –Australia;

Canada – Toronto and Calgary; and

Canada – Toronto and Calgary; and

Latin America –Brazil, Chile and Mexico.

Latin America –Brazil and Mexico.

Our property types consist of the following:

Urban—Hotels located in primary business districts of major cities;

Urban—Hotels located in primary business districts of major cities;

Suburban—Hotels located in office parks or smaller secondary markets;

Suburban—Hotels located in office parks or smaller secondary markets;

Resort/conference—Hotels located in resort/conference destinations such as Arizona, Florida, Hawaii and Southern California; and

Resort/conference—Hotels located in resort/conference destinations such as Arizona, Florida, Hawaii and Southern California; and

Airport—Hotels located at or near airports.

Airport—Hotels located at or near airports.

Constant US$, Nominal US$, and Constant Euros

Operating results denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the prevailing exchange rates on the date of the transaction, or monthly based on the weighted average exchange rate for the period. For comparative purposes, we also present the RevPAR results for 20122015 assuming the results of our foreign operations were translated using the same exchange rates that were effective for the comparable periods in 2013,2016, thereby eliminating the effect of currency fluctuation for the year-over-year comparisons. We believe this presentation is useful to investors as it provides clarity with respect to the growth in RevPAR in the local currency of the hotel consistent with howthe manner in which we would evaluate our domestic portfolio. However, the effect of changes in foreign currency has been reflected in the actual results of net income, EBITDA, earnings per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share. Nominal US$ results include the effect of currency fluctuations consistent with our financial statement presentation.

We also present RevPAR results for our joint venture in Europe in constant Euros using the same methodology as used for the constant US$ presentation.    

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use certain “non-GAAP financial measures,” which are measures of our historical financial performance that are not calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. These measures are as follows: (i) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as a measure of performance for Host Inc. and Host L.P., (ii) Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and FFO per diluted share (both NAREIT and Adjusted), as a measure of performance for Host Inc., and (iii) comparable hotel property level operating results, as a measure of performance for Host Inc. and Host L.P.


We calculate NAREIT FFO per diluted share in accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies whothat do not use the NAREIT definition of FFO or do not calculate FFO per

76


diluted share in accordance with NAREIT guidance. In addition, although FFO per diluted share is a useful measure when comparing our results to other REITs, it may not be helpful to investors when comparing us to non-REITs. We also calculate Adjusted FFO per diluted share, which measure is not in accordance with NAREIT guidance and may not be comparable to measures calculated by other REITs. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, also may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies. This information should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating profit, cash from operations or any other operating performance measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Cash expenditures for various long-term assets (such as renewal and replacement capital expenditures), interest expense (for EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA purposes only) and other items have been and will be made and are not reflected in the EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share presentations. Management compensates for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our consolidated statement of operations and cash flows include interest expense, capital expenditures, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, NAREIT FFO per diluted share, Adjusted FFO per diluted share, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of our liquidity or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. In addition, NAREIT FFO per diluted share and Adjusted FFO per diluted share do not measure, and should not be used as a measure of, amounts that accrue directly to stockholders’ benefit.

Similarly, Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share include adjustments for the pro rata share of our equity investments and non-controlling partners in consolidated partnerships. Our equity investments primarily consist of our approximate one-third interest in a European joint venture, a 25% interest in an Asian joint venture, a 67% ownership in a joint venture that owns a vacation ownership property in Hawaii and interests ranging from 11% to 50% in three partnerships that each own one hotel. Due to the voting rights of the outside owners, we do not control and, therefore, do not consolidate these entities. The non-controlling partners in consolidated partnerships primarily consist of the approximate 1% interest in Host LP held by outside partners and interests ranging from 15% to 48% held by outside partners in three partnerships each owning one hotel for which we do control the entity and, therefore, consolidate its operations. These pro rata results for Adjusted EBITDA were calculated as set forth in the definition below under “Equity Investment Adjustments” and ”Consolidated Partnership Adjustments.” Similar adjustments were made in the calculation of both NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share. Readers should be cautioned that the pro rata results presented in these measures for consolidated and non-consolidated partnerships may not accurately depict the legal and economic implications of our investments in these entities. The following discussion defines these terms and presents why we believe they are useful measures of our performance.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA

Earnings before Interest Expense, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) is a commonly used measure of performance in many industries. Management believes EBITDA provides useful information to investors regarding our results of operations because it helps us and our investors evaluate the ongoing operating performanceperformance of our properties after removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization). Management also believes the use of EBITDA facilitates comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners whothat are not REITs and other capital-intensive companies. Management uses EBITDA to evaluate property-level results and as one measure in determining the value of acquisitions and dispositions and, like FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share, it is widely used by management in the annual budget process and for compensation programs.

Adjusted EBITDA

Historically, management has adjusted EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance and that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of net income, is beneficial to an investor’sinvestor’s complete understanding of our operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA also is a relevant measure in calculating certain credit ratios. We adjust EBITDA for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted EBITDA:

Real Estate Transactions – We exclude the effect of gains and losses, including the amortization of deferred gains, recorded on the disposition or acquisition of depreciable assets and property insurance gains in our consolidated statement of operations because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our assets. In addition, material gains or losses from the depreciated book value of the disposed assets could be less important to investors given that the depreciated asset book value often does not reflect its market value (as noted below for FFO).

Real Estate Transactions – We exclude the effect of gains and losses, including the amortization of deferred gains, recorded on the disposition or acquisition of depreciable assets and property insurance gains in our consolidated statement of operations because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our assets. In addition, material gains or losses from the depreciated book value of the disposed assets could be less important to investors given that the depreciated asset book value often does not reflect its market value (as noted below for FFO).


Equity Investment Adjustments – We exclude the equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated investments in partnerships and joint ventures as presented in our consolidated statement of operations because it includes our pro rata portion of depreciation, amortization and interest expense, which are excluded from EBITDA. We include our pro rata share of the Adjusted EBITDA of our equity investments as we believe this more accurately reflects the performance of our investments. The pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of equity investments is defined as the EBITDA of our equity investments adjusted for any gains or losses on property transactions multiplied by our percentage ownership in the partnership or joint venture.

Consolidated Partnership Adjustments – We deduct the non-controlling partners’ pro rata share of the Adjusted EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships as this reflects the non-controlling owners’ interest in the EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships. The pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of non-controlling partners is defined as the EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships adjusted for any gains or losses on property transactions multiplied by the non-controlling partners’ positions in the partnership or joint venture.

Consolidated Partnership Adjustments – We deduct the non-controlling partners’ pro rata share of the Adjusted EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships as this reflects the non-controlling owners’ interest in the EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships. The pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of non-controlling partners is defined as the EBITDA of our consolidated partnerships adjusted for any gains or losses on property transactions multiplied by the non-controlling partners’ positions in the partnership or joint venture.

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle – Infrequently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) promulgates new accounting standards that require the consolidated statement of operations to reflect the cumulative effect of a

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle – Infrequently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) promulgates new accounting standards that require the consolidated statement of operations to reflect the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. We exclude these one-time adjustments because they do not reflect our actual performance for that period.

Impairment Losses – We exclude the effect of impairment expense recorded because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. In addition, we believe that impairment expense, which is based on historical cost book values, is similar to gains (losses) on dispositions and depreciation expense, both of which also are excluded from EBITDA.

Acquisition Costs – Under GAAP, costs associated with completed property acquisitions are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the company.

Litigation Gains and LossesEffective April 1, 2013, we have excluded the effect of gains or losses associated with litigation recorded under GAAP that we consider outside the ordinary course of business, which is consistent with the definition of Adjusted FFO that we adopted effective January 1, 2011. We believe that including these items is not consistent with our ongoing operating performance.

77


change in accounting principle. We exclude these one-time adjustments because they do not reflect our actual performance for that period.

Impairment Losses – We exclude the effect of impairment expense recorded because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. In addition, we believe that impairment expense, which is based on historical cost book values, is similar to gains (losses) on dispositions and depreciation expense, both of which also are excluded from EBITDA.

Acquisition Costs – Under GAAP, costs associated with completed property acquisitions are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the company.

Litigation Gains and LossesEffective April 1, 2013, we have excluded the effect of gains or losses associated with litigation recorded under GAAP that we consider outside the ordinary course of business, which is consistent with the definition of Adjusted FFO that we adopted effective January 1, 2011. We believe that including these items is not consistent with our ongoing operating performance.

In unusual circumstances, we also may adjust EBITDA for gains or losses that management believes are not representative of our current operating performance. For example, in the first quarter of 2013, management excluded the $11 million gain from the eminent domain claim for land adjacent to the Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center for which we received the cashcash proceeds in 2007, but, pending the resolution of certain contingencies, was not recognized until 2013. Typically, gains from the disposition of non-depreciable property are included in the determination of Adjusted EBITDA.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA (in millions):

Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for

Host Inc. and Host Hotels, L.P.

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Net income (1)

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

Interest expense

 

 

304

 

 

 

373

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

696

 

 

 

662

 

Income taxes

 

 

21

 

 

 

31

 

Discontinued operations (2)

 

 

15

 

 

 

32

 

EBITDA (3)

 

 

1,361

 

 

 

1,161

 

Gain on dispositions (4)

 

 

(98

)

 

 

(48

)

Acquisition costs

 

 

1

 

 

 

7

 

Recognition of deferred gain on land condemnation (1)

 

 

(11

)

 

 

 

Litigation loss (5)

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

Non-cash impairment expense

 

 

1

 

 

 

60

 

Amortization of deferred gains and other property transactions

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

Equity investment adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates (6)

 

 

17

 

 

 

(2

)

Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of equity investments

 

 

48

 

 

 

34

 

Consolidated partnership adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling partners in other consolidated partnerships

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(16

)

Adjusted EBITDA (3)

 

$

1,306

 

 

$

1,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net income (1)

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

Interest expense

 

 

154

 

 

 

227

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

724

 

 

 

708

 

Income taxes

 

 

40

 

 

 

9

 

EBITDA (1)

 

 

1,689

 

 

 

1,509

 

Gain on dispositions (2)

 

 

(250

)

 

 

(93

)

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(2

)

Acquisition costs

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Equity investment adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of affiliates

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(76

)

Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA of equity investments

 

 

65

 

 

 

81

 

Consolidated partnership adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro rata Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling partners in

     other consolidated partnerships

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(11

)

Adjusted EBITDA (1)

 

$

1,471

 

 

$

1,409

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

(1)

During the first quarter of 2013, we recognizedNet Income, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO include a previously deferred gain of approximately $11$2 million relatedfor each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, for the sale of the portion of land attributable to the eminent domain claimindividual units sold by the StateMaui timeshare joint venture. Additionally, in 2016, these line items include $12 million for the reimbursement of Georgia for 2.9 acres of landoperating losses at the AtlantaNew Orleans Marriott Perimeter Center for highway expansion, for which we received cash proceeds in 2007. We have included the gain in NAREIT FFO per diluted share, which is consistent with the treatment of gains recognized on the disposition of undepreciated assets. However, due to the significant passage of time since we received the proceeds, we have excluded the gain from Adjusted FFO per diluted share and Adjusted EBITDA for the year.2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill.  

(2)

Reflects the interest expense, depreciation and amortization and income taxes included in discontinued operations.

(3)

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA include a gain on sale of undepreciated property of $21 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 forten hotels in 2016 and the sale of excess land adjacent to our Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa, as a gain on sale of undepreciated property.eight hotels in 2015.  

(4)

Reflects the gain recorded on the sale of five hotels in 2013 and three hotels in 2012.

(5)

Effective April 1, 2013, we modified the definition of Adjusted EBITDA to exclude gains or losses associated with litigation outside the ordinary course of business, which is consistent with the definition of Adjusted FFO that we adopted effective January 1, 2011. On December 13, 2013, the Texas Supreme Court

78


granted our Petition for Review on litigation related to the sale of land under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter in 2005. We have accrued $68 million related to this litigation which we believe reflects substantially all of our obligation assuming we lose the appeal. We have $25 million in restricted cash that will be utilized to pay a portion of any judgment, assuming we lose the appeal.  

(6)

Includes an adjustment of $15 million for our portion of the non-cash impairment charges related to one of the hotels in our joint venture in Europe. The impairment charge has no effect on Adjusted EBITDA, NAREIT FFO or Adjusted FFO.

NAREIT FFO, NAREIT FFO per Diluted Share and Adjusted FFO per Diluted Share. We present NAREIT FFO and NAREIT FFO per diluted share as non-GAAP measures of our performance in addition to our earnings per share (calculated in accordance with GAAP). We calculate NAREIT FFO per diluted share as our NAREIT FFO (defined as set forth below)below) for a given operating period, as adjusted for the effect of dilutive securities, divided by the number of fully diluted shares outstanding during such period in accordance with NAREIT guidelines. NAREIT defines FFO as net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of real estate, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, real estate-related depreciation, amortization and impairments and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect our pro rata share of the FFO of those entities on the same basis.

We believe that NAREIT FFO per diluted share is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance and that the presentation of NAREIT FFO per diluted share, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of earnings per share, provides beneficial information to investors. By excluding the effect of real estate depreciation, amortization, impairmentsimpairments and gains and losses from sales of real estate, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and which may be of lesser significance in evaluating current performance, we believe such measures can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and with other REITs, even though NAREIT FFO per diluted share does not represent an amount that accrues directly to holders of our common stock. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. As noted by NAREIT in its April 2002 “White Paper on Funds From Operations,” since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For these reasons, NAREIT adopted the FFO metric in order to promote an industry-wide measure of REIT operating performance.

We also present Adjusted FFO per diluted share when evaluating our performance because management believes that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance.performance. Management historically has made the adjustments detailed below in evaluating our performance, in our annual budget process and for our compensation programs. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted FFO per diluted share, when combined with both the primary GAAP presentation of earnings per share and FFO per diluted share as defined by NAREIT, provides useful supplemental information that is beneficial to an investor’s complete understanding of our operating performance. We adjust NAREIT FFO per diluted share for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted FFO per diluted share:

Gains and Losses on the Extinguishment of Debt – We exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of the write off of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired and incremental interest expense incurred during the refinancing period. We also exclude the gains on debt repurchases and the original issuance costs associated with the retirement of preferred stock. We believe that these items are not reflective of our ongoing finance costs.

Gains and Losses on the Extinguishment of Debt – We exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of the write off of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired. We also exclude the gains on debt repurchases and the original issuance costs associated with the retirement of preferred stock. We believe that these items are not reflective of our ongoing finance costs.

Acquisition Costs –Under GAAP, costs associated with completed property acquisitions are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the company.

Acquisition Costs –Under GAAP, costs associated with completed property acquisitions are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the company.

Litigation Gains and Losses – We exclude the effect of gains or losses associated with litigation recorded under GAAP that we consider outside the ordinary course of business. We believe that including these items is not consistent with our ongoing operating performance.

Litigation Gains and Losses – We exclude the effect of gains or losses associated with litigation recorded under GAAP that we consider outside the ordinary course of business. We believe that including these items is not consistent with our ongoing operating performance.

In unusual circumstances, we also may adjust NAREIT FFO for gains or losses that management believes are not representative of our current operating performance. For example, in the first quarter of 2013, management excluded the $11 million gain from the eminent domain claim for land adjacent to the Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center for which we received the cash proceeds in 2007, but, pendingpending the resolution of certain contingencies, was not recognized until 2013. Typically, gains from the disposition of non-depreciable property are included in the determination of NAREIT and Adjusted FFO.

79



The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO (separately and on a per diluted share basis) for Host Inc. (in millions, except per share amounts):

Host Inc. Reconciliation of Net Income

to NAREIT and Adjusted Funds From Operations per Diluted Share

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net income(1)

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(2

)

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(7

)

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

 

317

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

762

 

 

 

558

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on dispositions, net of taxes (1)

 

 

(97

)

 

 

(48

)

Gain on dispositions (2)

 

 

(250

)

 

 

(93

)

Tax on dispositions

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(2

)

Amortization of deferred gains and other property transactions, net of taxes

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

703

 

 

 

691

 

 

 

720

 

 

 

704

 

Non-cash impairment expense

 

 

1

 

 

 

60

 

Equity investment adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates (2)

 

 

17

 

 

 

(2

)

Equity in earnings of affiliates

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(76

)

Pro rata FFO of equity investments

 

 

26

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

55

 

Consolidated partner adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated partnership adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFO adjustment for non-controlling partnerships

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(5

)

FFO adjustments for non-controlling interests of Host L.P.

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(10

)

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(7

)

NAREIT FFO (3)

 

 

951

 

 

 

759

 

NAREIT FFO (1)

 

 

1,257

 

 

 

1,134

 

Adjustments to NAREIT FFO:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

40

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

Acquisition costs (4)

 

 

1

 

 

 

10

 

Recognition of deferred gain on land condemnation (5)

 

 

(11

)

 

 

 

Litigation loss (6)

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

Loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

Adjusted FFO (3)

 

$

989

 

 

$

803

 

Acquisition costs

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Adjusted FFO (1)

 

$

1,257

 

 

$

1,180

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For calculation on a per share basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments for dilutive securities (7):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments for dilutive securities (3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assuming conversion of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

 

$

26

 

 

$

31

 

 

$

 

 

$

22

 

Diluted NAREIT FFO

 

$

977

 

 

$

790

 

 

$

1,257

 

 

$

1,156

 

Diluted Adjusted FFO

 

$

1,015

 

 

$

834

 

 

$

1,257

 

 

$

1,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding-EPS

 

 

747.9

 

 

 

719.6

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding - EPS

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding - EPS

 

743.7

 

 

 

752.9

 

Assuming conversion of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

 

 

29.5

 

 

 

40.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.4

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding - NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO

 

 

777.4

 

 

 

760.0

 

 

 

743.7

 

 

 

778.3

 

NAREIT FFO per diluted share

 

$

1.26

 

 

$

1.04

 

 

$

1.69

 

 

$

1.49

 

Adjusted FFO per diluted share

 

$

1.31

 

 

$

1.10

 

 

$

1.69

 

 

$

1.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)(1-2)

ReflectsRefer to the gain recordedcorresponding footnote on the sale of five hotels in 2013 and three hotels in 2012.

(2)

See footnote (6) to the Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.

(3)

NAREITEBITDA for Host Inc. and Adjusted FFO include a gain on sale of $21 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the sale of excess land adjacent to our Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa.

(4)

Includes approximately $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, related to our share of acquisition costs incurred by unconsolidated joint ventures.

(5)

See footnote (1) to the Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.

(6)

See footnote (5) to the Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.

(7)

Earnings (loss) per diluted share and NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share are adjusted for the effects of dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, preferred OP units held by non-controlling partners, exchangeable debt securities and other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units. No effect is shown for securities if they are anti-dilutive.Host L.P.

80(3)        Earnings per diluted share and NAREIT FFO and Adjusted FFO per diluted share are adjusted for the effects of dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, preferred OP units held by non-controlling partners, exchangeable debt securities and other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units. No effect is shown for securities if they are anti-dilutive.


 


Comparable Hotel Property Level Operating Results. We present certain operating results for our hotels, such as hotel revenues, expenses, adjusted operating profitEBITDA and adjusted operating profitEBITDA margin, on a comparable hotel, or “same store,” basis as supplemental information for investors. Our comparable hotelhotel results present operating results for hotels owned during the entirety of the periods being compared without giving effect to any acquisitions or dispositions, significant property damage or large scale capital improvements during these periods. We present these comparable hotel EBITDA to help us and our investors evaluate the ongoing operating results by eliminating corporate-level costs, including expenses related toperformance of our comparable properties after removing the impact of our capital structure as well as(primarily interest expense), and its asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization. We eliminateamortization). Other corporate-level costs and expenses are also removed to arrive at property level results because weproperty-level results. We believe these property-level results provide investors with more specific insightsupplemental information into the ongoing operating performance of our comparable hotels. We eliminate depreciation and amortization because, even though depreciation and amortization are property-level expenses, these non-cash expenses, which are based on historical cost accounting for real estate assets, implicitly assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. As noted earlier, because real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.

As a result of the elimination of corporate-level costs and expenses and depreciation and amortization, the comparable hotel operating results we present do not represent our total revenues, expenses or operating profit and these comparable hotel operating results should not be used to evaluateevaluate our performance as a whole. Management compensates for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our consolidated statements of operations include such amounts, all of which should be considered by investors when evaluating our performance.

We present these hotel operating results on a comparable hotel basis because we believe that doing so provides investors and management with useful information for evaluating the period-to-period performance of our hotels and facilitates comparisons with other hotel REITs and hotel owners. In particular, these measures assist management and investors in distinguishing whether increasesincreases or decreases in revenues and/or expenses are due to growth or decline of operations at comparable hotels (which represent the vast majority of our portfolio) or from other factors, such as the effect of acquisitions or dispositions. While management believes that presentation of comparable hotel results is a “same store” supplemental measure that provides useful information in evaluating our ongoing performance, this measure is not used to allocate resources or to assess the operating performance of these hotels, as these decisions are based on data for individual hotels and are not based on comparable portfolio hotel results. For these reasons, we believe that comparable hotel operating results, when combined with the presentation of GAAP operating profit, revenues and expenses, provide useful information to investors and management.

81



The following table presents certain operating results and statistics for our comparable hotels for the periods presented herein:

Comparable Hotel Results for Host Inc. and Host L.P.

(in millions, except hotel statistics)

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012 (1)

 

Number of hotels

 

 

105

 

 

 

105

 

Number of rooms

 

 

55,278

 

 

 

55,278

 

Percent change in comparable hotel RevPAR - Constant US$

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

Percent change in comparable hotel RevPAR – Nominal US$

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

 

Operating profit margin (2)

 

 

9.9

%

 

 

7.2

%

Comparable hotel adjusted operating profit margin (2)

 

 

25.5

%

 

 

24.5

%

Comparable hotel revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Room

 

$

3,051

 

 

$

2,896

 

Food and beverage (3)

 

 

1,347

 

 

 

1,295

 

Other

 

 

272

 

 

 

261

 

Comparable hotel revenues (4)

 

 

4,670

 

 

 

4,452

 

Comparable hotel expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Room

 

 

817

 

 

 

777

 

Food and beverage (5)

 

 

983

 

 

 

958

 

Other

 

 

139

 

 

 

139

 

Management fees, ground rent and other costs

 

 

1,541

 

 

 

1,489

 

Comparable hotel expenses (6)

 

 

3,480

 

 

 

3,363

 

Comparable hotel adjusted operating profit

 

 

1,190

 

 

 

1,089

 

Non-comparable hotel results, net (7)

 

 

140

 

 

 

105

 

Earnings for hotels leased from HPT (8)

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(697

)

 

 

(722

)

Corporate and other expenses (9)

 

 

(121

)

 

 

(107

)

Operating profit

 

$

512

 

 

$

362

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Number of hotels

 

 

88

 

 

 

88

 

Number of rooms

 

 

49,376

 

 

 

49,376

 

Change in comparable hotel RevPAR -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Constant US$

 

 

2.7

%

 

 

 

     Nominal US$

 

 

2.5

%

 

 

 

Operating profit margin (1)

 

 

12.6

%

 

 

11.8

%

Comparable hotel EBITDA margin (1)

 

 

27.8

%

 

 

27.0

%

Food and beverage profit margin (1)

 

 

30.3

%

 

 

29.2

%

Comparable hotel food and beverage profit margin (1)

 

 

30.6

%

 

 

29.7

%

Comparable hotel revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Room

 

$

3,194

 

 

$

3,105

 

Food and beverage (2)

 

 

1,430

 

 

 

1,406

 

Other

 

 

284

 

 

 

265

 

Comparable hotel revenues (3)

 

 

4,908

 

 

 

4,776

 

Comparable hotel expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Room

 

 

817

 

 

 

806

 

Food and beverage (4)

 

 

993

 

 

 

989

 

Other

 

 

99

 

 

 

122

 

Management fees, ground rent and other costs

 

 

1,635

 

 

 

1,570

 

Comparable hotel expenses (5)

 

 

3,544

 

 

 

3,487

 

Comparable hotel EBITDA

 

 

1,364

 

 

 

1,289

 

Non-comparable hotel results, net (6)

 

 

150

 

 

 

144

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(724

)

 

 

(708

)

Interest expense

 

 

(154

)

 

 

(227

)

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(40

)

 

 

(9

)

Gain on sale of property and corporate level income/expense

 

 

175

 

 

 

76

 

Net income

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

(1)

The full year 2012 is a leap year and includes one additional day of operations compared to the full year 2013.

(2)

Operating profitProfit margins are calculated by dividing the applicable operating profit by the related revenue amount. GAAP operating profit margins are calculated using amounts presented in the consolidated statements of operations. Comparable hotel margins are calculated using amounts presented in the above table.

(3)(2)

The reconciliation of total food and beverage sales per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable food and beverage sales is as follows:as:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012 (1)

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Food and beverage per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

1,503

 

 

$

1,419

 

Food and beverage sales per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

1,599

 

 

$

1,568

 

Non-comparable hotel food and beverage sales

 

 

(189

)

 

 

(157

)

 

 

(169

)

 

 

(162

)

Food and beverage sales for the property for which we record rental income

 

 

33

 

 

 

33

 

Comparable food and beverage sales

 

$

1,347

 

 

$

1,295

 

 

$

1,430

 

 

$

1,406

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4)(3)

The reconciliation of total revenues per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable hotel revenues is as follows:    

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012 (1)

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Revenues per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

5,166

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

5,350

 

Non-comparable hotel revenues

 

 

(548

)

 

 

(426

)

 

 

(522

)

 

 

(574

)

Hotel revenues for which we record rental income, net

 

 

52

 

 

 

51

 

Revenues for hotels leased from HPT (8)

 

 

 

 

 

(232

)

Comparable hotel revenues

 

$

4,670

 

 

$

4,452

 

 

$

4,908

 

 

$

4,776

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82



(5)(4)

The reconciliation of total food and beverage expenses per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable food and beverage expenses is as follows:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012 (1)

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Food and beverage expenses per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

1,095

 

 

$

1,049

 

 

$

1,114

 

 

$

1,110

 

Non-comparable hotel food and beverage expenses

 

 

(133

)

 

 

(112

)

 

 

(121

)

 

 

(121

)

Food and beverage expenses for the property for which we record rental income

 

 

21

 

 

 

21

 

Comparable food and beverage expenses

 

$

983

 

 

$

958

 

 

$

993

 

 

$

989

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6)(5)

The reconciliation of operating costs and expenses per the consolidated statements of operations to the comparable hotel expenses is as follows:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012 (1)

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Operating costs and expenses per the consolidated statements of operations

 

$

4,654

 

 

$

4,697

 

 

$

4,746

 

 

$

4,719

 

Non-comparable hotel expenses

 

 

(408

)

 

 

(321

)

 

 

(372

)

 

 

(430

)

Hotel expenses for which we record rental income

 

 

52

 

 

 

51

 

Expense for hotels leased from HPT (8)

 

 

 

 

 

(235

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(697

)

 

 

(722

)

 

 

(724

)

 

 

(708

)

Corporate and other expenses (9)

 

 

(121

)

 

 

(107

)

Corporate and other expenses

 

 

(106

)

 

 

(94

)

Comparable hotel expenses

 

$

3,480

 

 

$

3,363

 

 

$

3,544

 

 

$

3,487

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7)(6)

Non-comparable hotel results, net, includes the following items: (i) the results of operations of our non-comparable hotels and sold hotels, which operations are included in our consolidated statements of operations as continuing operations, (ii) gains on property insurance settlements and business interruption proceeds, and (iii) the results of our office buildings.  

(8)

The lease terminated on December 31, 2012.

(9)

For the year ended December 31, 2013, corporate expenses include a litigation loss of $8 million due to an adverse ruling related to our San Antonio ground lease.

 

83


 


ItemItem 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

All information in this section applies to Host Inc. and Host L.P.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevantwith respect to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We have no derivative financial instruments that are held for trading purposes. We use derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks.

The interest payments on 71%65% of our debt are fixed in nature (this percentage does not include $300 million of mortgage debt for which we have swapped fixed interest payments for floating interest payments), which largely mitigates the effect of changes in interest rates on our cash interest payments.nature. Valuations for mortgage debt and the credit facility are determined based on expected future payments, discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The senior notes and the Debentures are valued based on quoted market prices. If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase or decrease by 100 basis points, interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, our future earnings and cash flows by approximately $15$13 million in 2014.

2017. The table below presents scheduled maturities and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates (in millions, except percentages):

 

 

Expected Maturity Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

 

Value

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate (1)

$

317

 

 

$

398

 

 

$

150

 

 

$

40

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,650

 

 

$

3,555

 

 

$

3,916

 

Average interest rate

 

5.58

%

 

 

5.54

%

 

 

5.35

%

 

 

5.31

%

 

 

5.28

%

 

 

5.19

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate (1)

$

 

 

$

446

 

 

$

258

 

 

$

500

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,204

 

 

$

1,204

 

Average interest rate (2)

 

2.49

%

 

 

2.50

%

 

 

2.31

%

 

 

1.82

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,759

 

 

$

5,120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate derivative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed to variable-notional

$

300

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value (asset)/liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(1

)

Average pay rate (2)

 

3.25

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average receive rate

 

5.531

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable to fixed-notional

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

118

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value (asset)/liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3

 

Average pay rate

 

6.95

%

 

 

6.95

%

 

 

6.77

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average receive rate (2)

 

5.04

%

 

 

5.04

%

 

 

4.96

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected Maturity Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

 

Value

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate (1) (2)

$

(3

)

 

$

(3

)

 

$

(3

)

 

$

(3

)

 

$

297

 

 

$

2,096

 

 

$

2,381

 

 

$

2,478

 

Average interest rate

 

4.65

%

 

 

4.65

%

 

 

4.65

%

 

 

4.65

%

 

 

4.61

%

 

 

4.34

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate (1)

$

560

 

 

$

210

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

499

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,268

 

 

$

1,273

 

Average interest rate (3)

 

1.88

%

 

 

1.81

%

 

 

1.87

%

 

 

1.87

%

 

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,649

 

 

$

3,751

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The amounts are net of unamortized discounts and premiums.deferred financing costs.

(2)

Negative amounts prior to maturity represent the amortization of original issue discounts and deferred financing costs.

(3)

The interest rate for our floating rate payments is based on the rate in effect as of December 31, 2013.2016. No adjustments are made for forecast changes in the rate.

84


Interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. We have designated our floating-to-fixed interest rate swap derivatives as cash flow hedges. The purpose of the interest rate swaps is to hedge against changes in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to fluctuations in benchmark interest rates associated with variable rate debt. The derivatives are valued based on the prevailing market yield curve on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk when we calculate the fair value of the swaps. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) on the accompanying balance sheets. The hedges were fully effective as of December 31, 2013. The following table summarizes our interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Fair Value

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Transaction

 

Notional

 

 

Maturity

 

Swapped

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Date

 

Amount

 

 

Date

 

Index

 

All-in-Rate

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

November 2011 (1)

 

A$

62

 

 

November 2016

 

Reuters BBSY

 

 

6.7

%

 

$

1

 

 

$

(2

)

February 2011 (2)

 

NZ$

79

 

 

February 2016

 

NZ$ Bank Bill

 

 

7.15

%

 

$

2

 

 

$

 

(1)

The swap was entered into in connection with the A$82 million ($71 million) mortgage loan on the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf.

(2)

The swap was entered into in connection with the NZ$105 million ($87 million) mortgage loan on seven properties in New Zealand.

Interest Rate Swap Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges. We have designated our fixed-to-floating interest rate swap derivatives as fair value hedges. We enter into these derivative instruments to hedge changes in the fair value of fixed-rate debt that occur as a result of changes in market interest rates. The derivatives are valued based on the prevailing market yield curve on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk in the calculation of the fair value of the swaps. The change in the fair value of the derivative is offset largely by the corresponding change in the fair value of the underlying debt due to change in the 3-month LIBOR rate, which is recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the debt. Any difference between the change in the fair value of the swap and the change in the fair value in the underlying debt, which was not significant for the periods presented, is considered the ineffective portion of the hedging relationship and is recorded in net income (loss).

We have three fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $300 million. During 2013 and 2012, the fair value of the swaps decreased $6 million and $4 million, respectively. As a result, we will pay a floating interest rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR, plus a spread which ranges from 2.7% to 3.2%, as opposed to the fixed rate of 5.531%, on the notional amount of $300 million through March 1, 2014. During 2013 and 2012, the cash settlement received under the swap agreement decreased interest expense by $7 million and $6 million, respectively.

85


Exchange Rate Sensitivity

We have currency exchange risk as a result of our hotel ownership in Australia, Brazil, Canada Chile,and Mexico Brazil, and New Zealand and our investment in the European and Asia/Pacific joint ventures. We utilize several strategies to mitigate the exposure of exchange risk for our portfolio, including (i) utilizing local currency denominated debt (including foreign currency draws on our credit facility), (ii) entering into forward or option foreign currency purchase contracts, and (iii) investing through partnership and joint venture structures. For 20132016 and 2012,2015, revenues from our consolidated foreign operations were $271$171 million (or 5% of total revenues) and $268$221 million, (or 5%or 3% and 4%, respectively, of our total revenues), respectively.revenues. As of December 31, 2013,2016, our international investments consisted of the following (in millions):    

Consolidated

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain/(Loss)

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

Credit

 

 

 

 

 

on Foreign

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

Mortgage

 

 

Controlling

 

 

 

 

 

Facility

 

 

Net Asset

 

 

Currency

 

Country

 

 

(Book Value)

 

 

Debt

 

 

interest

 

 

Net Assets

 

 

Draw

 

 

Exposure

 

 

Exposure (1)

 

 

Consolidated Assets (Book Value)

 

 

Mortgage Debt

 

 

Non-Controlling Interest

 

 

Net Assets

 

 

Credit Facility Draw(1)

 

 

Foreign Currency Forward Purchase Contracts (notional)

 

 

Net Asset Exposure

 

 

2016  Net Gain/(Loss) on Foreign Currency Exposure (2)

 

Australia

 

$

123

 

$

(71

)

$

(11

)

$

41

 

$

 

$

41

 

$

(8

)

 

$

111

 

 

$

(62

)

 

$

(10

)

 

$

39

 

 

$

(36

)

 

$

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

1

 

Brazil

 

 

104

 

 

 

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

 

104

 

 

(9

)

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

9

 

Canada

 

 

114

 

 

 

 

 

 

114

 

 

(100

)

 

14

 

 

(1

)

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

(80

)

 

 

(19

)

 

 

(24

)

 

 

(1

)

Chile

 

 

72

 

 

 

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

 

72

 

 

(7

)

Mexico

 

 

36

 

 

 

 

(17

)

 

19

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

(1

)

New Zealand

 

 

163

 

 

(87

)

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

New Zealand(3)

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

United Kingdom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19

)

 

(19

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

3

 

 

$

612

 

$

(158

)

$

(28

)

$

426

 

$

(119

)

$

307

 

$

(25

)

 

$

315

 

 

$

(62

)

 

$

(18

)

 

$

235

 

 

$

(130

)

 

$

(51

)

 

$

54

 

 

$

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unconsolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forward

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain/(Loss )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase

 

 

Credit

 

 

 

 

 

on Foreign

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment

 

 

Contracts

 

 

Facility

 

 

Net Asset

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

 

(notional)

 

 

Draw

 

 

Exposure

 

 

Exposure (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

European Joint Venture

 

$

374

 

$

(163

)

$

(102

)

$

109

 

$

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

394

 

$

(163

)

$

(102

)

$

129

 

$

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Unconsolidated

 

 

Investment Balance

 

 

Foreign Currency Forward Purchase Contracts (notional)

 

 

Credit Facility Draw

 

 

Net Asset Exposure

 

 

2016  Net Gain/(Loss) on Foreign Currency Exposure (2)

 

European Joint Venture

 

$

227

 

 

$

(118

)

 

$

(81

)

 

$

28

 

 

$

(4

)

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

244

 

 

$

(118

)

 

$

(81

)

 

$

45

 

 

$

(4

)

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Approximately $34 million of the $80 million CAD credit facility draw and the entire AUD credit facility draw have been designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign entities.

(1)(2)

Includes a net amountgain of $(23)$1 million that is included in accumulated other comprehensive income and $2$6 million recognized during 20132016 in our Statement of Operations.

(3)

We have substantially liquidated our New Zealand assets; however, the remaining balance relates to $35 million of cash repatriated in January 2017.

Hedging Instruments. As described above, to manage the currency exchange risk applicable to ownership in non-U.S. hotels, where possible, we may enter into forward or option foreign currency purchase contracts or designate a portion of the foreign currency draws on our creditcredit facility as hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The foreign currency exchange agreements into which we have entered strictly are to hedge foreign currency risk and are not for trading purposes.  

During 2016, in connection with the maturity of foreign currency forward sale contracts with a total notional amount of C$25 million and €30 million, for which we received total proceeds of approximately $11 million, we entered into new foreign currency forward sale contracts with the same notional amounts. We also entered into a new foreign currency forward sale contract with a total notional amount of NZ$45 million. The gain related to the matured contracts is included in accumulated other comprehensive income and will be recognized in earnings when our investments have been repatriated.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we have five six foreign currency forward sale contracts that hedge a portion of the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in Europe.foreign operations. These derivatives are considered hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation and are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) within the equity portion of our balance sheets. The foreign currency forward sale contracts are valued based on the forward yield curve of the foreign currency to U.S. dollar forward exchange rate on the date of measurement. Pursuant to these contracts, we will sell the Euroforeign currency amount, as applicable, and receive the U.S. dollar amount on the forward sale date.

We also evaluate counterparty credit risk when we calculate the fair value of the derivatives.

As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of our foreign currency forward sale contracts is $12 million. The following table summarizes our foreign currency forward sale contracts (in millions):

 

Currently Outstanding

 

Change in Fair Value – All Contracts

 

 

 

Total Transaction

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount in

 

 

Transaction

 

 

Forward

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Transaction

 

Foreign

 

 

Amount

 

 

Purchase

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Date Range

 

Currency

 

 

in Dollars

 

 

Date Range

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

May 2008-January 2013

 

120

 

 

$

163

 

 

May 2014-January 2016

 

$

(5

)

 

$

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currently Outstanding

 

Change in Fair Value - All Contracts

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

Amount in

 

 

Total

Transaction

 

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Transaction Date

 

Foreign

 

 

Amount

 

 

Forward Purchase

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Range

 

Currency

 

 

in Dollars

 

 

Date Range

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

May 2014-January 2016

 

 

100

 

 

$

118

 

 

May 2017-January 2018

 

$

5

 

 

$

13

 

November 2016

 

C$

 

25

 

 

$

19

 

 

November 2018

 

$

 

 

$

3

 

November 2016

 

NZ$

 

45

 

 

$

32

 

 

February 2017

 

$

1

 

 

$

 


86


In addition to the foreign currency forward sale contracts, we have designated a portion of the foreign currency draws on our credit facility as hedges of net investments in foreign operations. As a result, currency translation adjustments in the designated credit facility draws are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) within the equity portion of our balance sheet, which adjustments offset a portion of the translation adjustment related to our international investments. The following table summarizes the draws on our credit facility that are designated as hedges of net investments in foreign operations (in millions):

 

 

 

Balance

 

Balance

 

Gain (Loss)

 

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding in

 

Year ended December 31,

Currency

 

US$

 

Foreign Currency

 

2013

 

2012

Canadian dollars (1)

 

$

29

 

C$

31

 

$

2

 

$

Euros

 

$

102

 

74

 

$

(5)

 

$

(2)

 

 

 

Balance

Balance

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding in

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Currency

 

 

US$

 

Foreign Currency

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

Canadian dollars (1)

 

$

34

 

C$

46

 

$

(1)

 

$

5

Euros

 

$

81

 

77

 

$

3

 

$

10

Australian dollars

 

$

36

 

A$

50

 

$

2

 

$

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

We have drawn an additional $71$45 million on the credit facility in Canadian dollars that has not been designated as a hedging instrument.

 

 

 

87



Item 8.      Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The following financial information is included on the pages indicated:

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. & Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

8987

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

9189

Financial Statements of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

9290

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

9391

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

9492

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

9593

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

9694

Financial Statements of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.:

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

9896

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

9997

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

10098

Consolidated Statements of Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

10199

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

102100

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

104102

 

 

 

88



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013.2016. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule III. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013,2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 26, 201424, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

 

February 26, 201424, 2017

 

 

89



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

We have audited Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Item 9a9A Controls and Procedures—Internal Control over Financial Reporting of Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accountingaccounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013,2016, and our report dated February 26, 2014,24, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

 

February 26, 201424, 2017

 

 

 

 

90



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013.2016. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule III. These consolidated financial statements and financial statementstatement schedule are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesincludes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Host Hotels & Resorts, L. P.L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013,2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

 

February 26, 201424, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

91



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

ASSETS

 

ASSETS

 

Property and equipment, net

 

$

10,995

 

 

$

11,588

 

 

$

10,145

 

 

$

10,583

 

Assets held for sale

 

 

150

 

 

 

55

 

Due from managers

 

 

52

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

56

 

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

415

 

 

 

347

 

 

 

286

 

 

 

324

 

Deferred financing costs, net

 

 

42

 

 

 

53

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund

 

 

173

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

141

 

Other

 

 

244

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

225

 

 

 

261

 

Restricted cash

 

 

32

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

15

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

861

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

372

 

 

 

221

 

Total assets

 

$

12,814

 

 

$

12,994

 

 

$

11,408

 

 

$

11,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES, NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY

LIABILITIES, NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY

 

LIABILITIES, NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY

 

Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes, including $371 million and $531 million, respectively, net of discount, of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

 

$

3,018

 

 

$

3,569

 

Credit facility, including the $500 million term loan

 

 

946

 

 

 

763

 

Senior notes

 

$

2,380

 

 

$

2,376

 

Credit facility, including term loans of $997 million and $996 million,

respectively

 

 

1,206

 

 

 

1,291

 

Mortgage debt

 

 

709

 

 

 

993

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

200

 

Other

 

 

86

 

 

 

86

 

Total debt

 

 

4,759

 

 

 

5,411

 

 

 

3,649

 

 

 

3,867

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

214

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

243

 

Other

 

 

389

 

 

 

372

 

 

 

283

 

 

 

299

 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,362

 

 

 

5,977

 

 

 

4,210

 

 

 

4,409

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-controlling interests - Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

190

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $.01, 1,050 million shares authorized; 754.8 million and 724.6 million shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

8

 

 

 

7

 

Common stock, par value $.01, 1,050 million shares authorized,

737.8 million shares and 750.3 million shares issued and

outstanding, respectively

 

 

7

 

 

 

8

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

8,492

 

 

 

8,040

 

 

 

8,077

 

 

 

8,302

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(9

)

 

 

12

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(83

)

 

 

(107

)

Deficit

 

 

(1,263

)

 

 

(1,234

)

 

 

(1,007

)

 

 

(1,139

)

Total equity of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. stockholders

 

 

7,228

 

 

 

6,825

 

 

 

6,994

 

 

 

7,064

 

Non-controlling interests—other consolidated partnerships

 

 

34

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

40

 

Total equity

 

 

7,262

 

 

 

6,859

 

 

 

7,033

 

 

 

7,104

 

Total liabilities, non-controlling interests and equity

 

$

12,814

 

 

$

12,994

 

 

$

11,408

 

 

$

11,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 

92



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions, except per common share amounts)

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

3,492

 

 

$

3,465

 

 

$

3,452

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,599

 

 

 

1,568

 

 

 

1,546

 

Other

 

 

339

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

323

 

Total revenues

 

 

5,430

 

 

 

5,350

 

 

 

5,321

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

893

 

 

 

902

 

 

 

924

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,114

 

 

 

1,110

 

 

 

1,109

 

Other departmental and support expenses

 

 

1,306

 

 

 

1,295

 

 

 

1,264

 

Management fees

 

 

236

 

 

 

226

 

 

 

227

 

Other property-level expenses

 

 

382

 

 

 

386

 

 

 

377

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

724

 

 

 

708

 

 

 

693

 

Corporate and other expenses

 

 

106

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

43

 

Gain on insurance and business interruption settlements

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(10

)

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

4,746

 

 

 

4,719

 

 

 

4,627

 

OPERATING PROFIT

 

 

684

 

 

 

631

 

 

 

694

 

Interest income

 

 

3

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Interest expense

 

 

(154

)

 

 

(227

)

 

 

(207

)

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

253

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

236

 

Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

 

 

4

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(1

)

Equity in earnings of affiliates

 

 

21

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

29

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

811

 

 

 

574

 

 

 

755

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(40

)

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(14

)

NET INCOME

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

741

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(9

)

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS &

     RESORTS, INC.

 

$

762

 

 

$

558

 

 

$

732

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

1.03

 

 

$

.74

 

 

$

.97

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

1.02

 

 

$

.74

 

 

$

.96

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

3,317

 

 

$

3,082

 

 

$

2,849

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,503

 

 

 

1,419

 

 

 

1,336

 

Other

 

 

295

 

 

 

287

 

 

 

279

 

Owned hotel revenues

 

 

5,115

 

 

 

4,788

 

 

 

4,464

 

Other revenues

 

 

51

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

250

 

Total revenues

 

 

5,166

 

 

 

5,059

 

 

 

4,714

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

894

 

 

 

836

 

 

 

780

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,095

 

 

 

1,049

 

 

 

993

 

Other departmental and support expenses

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

1,179

 

Management fees

 

 

222

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

181

 

Other property-level expenses

 

 

376

 

 

 

576

 

 

 

554

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

697

 

 

 

722

 

 

 

609

 

Corporate and other expenses

 

 

121

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

111

 

Gain on insurance settlements

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(2

)

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

4,697

 

 

 

4,405

 

OPERATING PROFIT

 

 

512

 

 

 

362

 

 

 

309

 

Interest income

 

 

4

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

20

 

Interest expense

 

 

(304

)

 

 

(373

)

 

 

(371

)

Net gains on property transactions and other

 

 

33

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

7

 

Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

 

 

3

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

3

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

 

 

(17

)

 

 

2

 

 

 

4

 

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

231

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

(28

)

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(31

)

 

 

1

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(27

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

11

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

(16

)

Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

1

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

 

$

317

 

 

$

61

 

 

$

(15

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.27

 

 

$

(.01

)

 

$

(.04

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

.02

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.08

 

 

$

(.02

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.27

 

 

$

(.01

)

 

$

(.04

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.09

 

 

 

.02

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

 

$

.42

 

 

$

.08

 

 

$

(.02

)

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

93



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

(16

)

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

(18

)

 

 

20

 

 

 

(27

)

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

1

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX

 

 

(21

)

 

 

13

 

 

 

(26

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

304

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

(42

)

Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

1

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

 

$

296

 

 

$

74

 

 

$

(41

)

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

NET INCOME

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

741

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income

     (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

(71

)

 

 

(60

)

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

7

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

19

 

Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

17

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX

 

 

24

 

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(41

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

795

 

 

 

508

 

 

 

700

 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling

     interests

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(9

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST

     HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

 

$

787

 

 

$

503

 

 

$

691

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements.

 

94



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBISIDARIESSUBISIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)

Common Shares Outstanding

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional Paid-in Capital

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Retained Earnings / (Deficit)

 

 

Non-controlling Interest of Other Consolidated Partnerships

 

 

Non-controlling Interests of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

675.6

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

 

$

7

 

 

$

7,236

 

 

$

25

 

 

$

(965

)

 

$

29

 

 

$

191

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(33

)

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27.9

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

 

 

 

459

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

1.3

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(99

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(1

)

 

705.1

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

7

 

 

$

7,750

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

(1,079

)

 

$

36

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(12

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.5

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(216

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(3

)

 

724.6

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

7

 

 

$

8,040

 

 

$

12

 

 

$

(1,234

)

 

$

34

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(38

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.7

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

1

 

 

 

476

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(346

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(4

)

 

754.8

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

8

 

 

$

8,492

 

 

$

(9

)

 

$

(1,263

)

 

$

34

 

 

$

190

 

Common Shares Outstanding

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional Paid-in Capital

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Retained Earnings / (Deficit)

 

 

Non-controlling Interest of Other Consolidated Partnerships

 

 

Non-controlling Interests of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

754.8

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

8

 

 

$

8,492

 

 

$

(9

)

 

$

(1,263

)

 

$

53

 

 

$

190

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(39

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(60

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee

     stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(567

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(6

)

 

755.8

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

8

 

 

$

8,476

 

 

$

(50

)

 

$

(1,098

)

 

$

52

 

 

$

225

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

558

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

(78

)

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(71

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from Other

     Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

 

 

 

401

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee

     stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(599

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(8

)

 

(38.3

)

 

Repurchase of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

(675

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

750.3

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

$

8

 

 

$

8,302

 

 

$

(107

)

 

$

(1,139

)

 

$

40

 

 

$

143

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

762

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(30

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from Other

     Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

Common stock issuances

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

Comprehensive stock and employee

     stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(630

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

(13.8

)

 

Repurchase of common stock

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(217

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

737.8

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

$

7

 

 

$

8,077

 

 

$

(83

)

 

$

(1,007

)

 

$

39

 

 

$

165

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

95



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

$

(16

)

Net income

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

741

 

Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on dispositions

 

 

(97

)

 

(48

)

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

10

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

46

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

697

 

 

722

 

609

 

 

 

724

 

 

 

708

 

 

 

693

 

Amortization of finance costs, discounts and premiums, net

 

 

25

 

 

13

 

30

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

24

 

Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

13

 

 

9

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

2

 

Stock compensation expense

 

 

18

 

 

16

 

19

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

22

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

6

 

 

17

 

(11

)

 

 

27

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(1

)

Net gains on property transactions and other

 

 

(33

)

 

(13

)

 

(7

)

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(253

)

 

 

(95

)

 

 

(236

)

(Gain) loss on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

 

 

(3

)

 

4

 

(3

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

5

 

 

 

1

 

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(1

)

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates

 

 

17

 

 

(2

)

 

(4

)

Equity in earnings of affiliates

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(76

)

 

 

(29

)

Change in due from managers

 

 

21

 

 

(42

)

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

(17

)

Distributions from investments in affiliates

 

 

29

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

7

 

Change in restricted cash for operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Changes in other assets

 

 

39

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

12

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

(34

)

Changes in other liabilities

 

 

(19

)

 

 

1

 

 

3

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

(56

)

 

 

(57

)

Cash provided by operating activities

 

 

1,019

 

 

 

781

 

 

 

662

 

 

 

1,303

 

 

 

1,159

 

 

 

1,140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of assets, net

 

 

643

 

 

160

 

46

 

 

 

467

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

497

 

Return of investments in affiliates

 

 

23

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

42

 

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(65

)

Acquisitions

 

 

(166

)

 

(441

)

 

(1,047

)

 

 

(63

)

 

 

(438

)

 

 

(138

)

Deferred sale proceeds received from HPT

 

 

51

 

 

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

(74

)

 

(132

)

 

(49

)

Return on investment

 

 

3

 

 

Return on mortgage loan investment

 

 

82

 

1

 

Capital expenditures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Renewals and replacements

 

 

(303

)

 

(366

)

 

(327

)

 

 

(293

)

 

 

(383

)

 

 

(316

)

Redevelopment and acquisition-related investments

 

 

(133

)

 

(272

)

 

(215

)

 

 

(226

)

 

 

(275

)

 

 

(112

)

New development

 

 

(19

)

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13

)

Change in furniture, fixtures and equipment ("FF&E") replacement fund

 

 

(23

)

 

16

 

4

 

 

 

(31

)

 

 

(10

)

 

 

17

 

Change in restricted cash for investing activities

 

 

13

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

 

Property insurance proceeds

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

2

 

Cash used in investing activities

 

 

(75

)

 

 

(886

)

 

 

(1,576

)

 

 

(115

)

 

 

(732

)

 

 

(86

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing costs

 

 

(4

)

 

(18

)

 

(23

)

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(4

)

Issuances of debt

 

 

550

 

 

900

 

955

 

 

 

 

 

 

898

 

 

 

4

 

Draws on credit facility

 

 

393

 

 

231

 

153

 

 

 

734

 

 

 

845

 

 

 

4

 

Term loan issuance

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

Repayment on credit facility

 

 

(207

)

 

(89

)

 

(90

)

Repayment of credit facility

 

 

(816

)

 

 

(725

)

 

 

(225

)

Repurchase/redemption of senior notes

 

 

(801

)

 

(1,795

)

 

(404

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,001

)

 

 

(150

)

Mortgage debt prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(411

)

 

(113

)

 

(210

)

Scheduled principal repayments

 

 

(2

)

 

(2

)

 

(5

)

Mortgage debt and other prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(137

)

 

 

(35

)

 

 

(384

)

Issuance of common stock

 

 

303

 

 

274

 

323

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

4

 

Common stock repurchase

 

 

(218

)

 

 

(675

)

 

 

 

Dividends on common stock

 

 

(313

)

 

(187

)

 

(70

)

 

 

(596

)

 

 

(646

)

 

 

(469

)

Contributions from non-controlling interests

 

 

7

 

 

1

 

1

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

(12

)

 

(7

)

 

(5

)

Change in restricted cash for financing activities

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

(493

)

 

 

(305

)

 

 

628

 

Other financing activities

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(9

)

 

 

1

 

Cash used in financing activities

 

 

(1,037

)

 

 

(857

)

 

 

(1,219

)

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash held

 

 

(7

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(8

)

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

444

 

 

 

(409

)

 

 

(287

)

 

 

151

 

 

 

(445

)

 

 

(173

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

 

417

 

 

826

 

 

 

1,113

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

666

 

 

 

839

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

 

$

861

 

 

$

417

 

 

$

826

 

 

$

372

 

 

$

221

 

 

$

666

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

96



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:

During 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, Host Inc. issued approximately 0.30.6 million, 0.60.1 million and 0.3 million shares of common stock, respectively, upon the conversion of Host L.P. units, or OP units, held by non-controlling interests valued at $10 million, $3 million and $6 million, $10 million and $5 million, respectively.

In March 2013,During 2015, holders of approximately $174$399 million of the 3.25%our 2.5% Exchangeable Senior Debentures due 2029 elected to exchangeconvert their debentures for approximately 11.7into 32 million shares of Host Inc. common stock.

In November 2012, we contributed land with a book value of $11 million and a fair value of $36 million to a joint venture with Hyatt Residential Group to develop a vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii. We recorded an initial investment of $8 million related to our 67% ownership in the joint venture and a gain of $8 million related to the portion of the land attributable to Hyatt Residential Group’s 33% interest, for which we received cash of $12 million.

In June 2011, holders of approximately $134 million of the 3.25% Exchangeable Debentures elected to exchange their debentures for approximately 8.8 million shares of Host Inc. common stock.

On June 28, 2011, we transferred the Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II at a price of £64 million ($102 million), including the assumption of the associated £32 million ($52 million) mortgage. We also transferred the capital lease asset and corresponding liability associated with the building, each valued at £38 million ($61 million), to the Euro JV Fund II. We retained a 33.4% interest in the property through our general and limited partner interests in the Euro JV Fund II and received cash proceeds on the transfer of £25 million ($40 million).

On April 29, 2011, we acquired a 75% controlling interest in the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed A$80 million ($86 million) of mortgage debt.

On March 17, 2011, we acquired the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego, and certain related rights. In connection with the acquisition, Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. issued approximately 0.3 million OP units valued at approximately $6 million.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 

97



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

(in millions)

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

ASSETS

 

ASSETS

 

Property and equipment, net

 

$

10,995

 

 

$

11,588

 

 

$

10,145

 

 

$

10,583

 

Assets held for sale

 

 

150

 

 

 

55

 

Due from managers

 

 

52

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

56

 

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

415

 

 

 

347

 

 

 

286

 

 

 

324

 

Deferred financing costs, net

 

 

42

 

 

 

53

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund

 

 

173

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

141

 

Other

 

 

244

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

225

 

 

 

261

 

Restricted cash

 

 

32

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

15

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

861

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

372

 

 

 

221

 

Total assets

 

$

12,814

 

 

$

12,994

 

 

$

11,408

 

 

$

11,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS OF THIRD PARTIES AND CAPITAL

LIABILITIES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS OF THIRD PARTIES AND CAPITAL

 

LIABILITIES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS OF THIRD PARTIES AND CAPITAL

 

Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes, including $371 million and $531 million, respectively, net of discount, of Exchangeable Senior Debentures

 

$

3,018

 

 

$

3,569

 

Credit facility, including the $500 million term loan

 

 

946

 

 

 

763

 

Senior notes

 

$

2,380

 

 

$

2,376

 

Credit facility, including term loans of $997 million and $996 million,

respectively

 

 

1,206

 

 

 

1,291

 

Mortgage debt

 

 

709

 

 

 

993

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

200

 

Other

 

 

86

 

 

 

86

 

Total debt

 

 

4,759

 

 

 

5,411

 

 

 

3,649

 

 

 

3,867

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

214

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

243

 

Other

 

 

389

 

 

 

372

 

 

 

283

 

 

 

299

 

Total liabilities

 

 

5,362

 

 

 

5,977

 

 

 

4,210

 

 

 

4,409

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited partnership interests of third parties

 

 

190

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General partner

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Limited partner

 

 

7,236

 

 

 

6,812

 

 

 

7,076

 

 

 

7,170

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(9

)

 

 

12

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(83

)

 

 

(107

)

Total Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. capital

 

 

7,228

 

 

 

6,825

 

 

 

6,994

 

 

 

7,064

 

Non-controlling interests—consolidated partnerships

 

 

34

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

40

 

Total capital

 

 

7,262

 

 

 

6,859

 

 

 

7,033

 

 

 

7,104

 

Total liabilities, limited partnership interest of third parties and capital

 

$

12,814

 

 

$

12,994

 

 

$

11,408

 

 

$

11,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 

98



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions, except per common unit amounts)

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

3,317

 

 

$

3,082

 

 

$

2,849

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,503

 

 

 

1,419

 

 

 

1,336

 

Other

 

 

295

 

 

 

287

 

 

 

279

 

Owned hotel revenues

 

 

5,115

 

 

 

4,788

 

 

 

4,464

 

Other revenues

 

 

51

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

250

 

Total revenues

 

 

5,166

 

 

 

5,059

 

 

 

4,714

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

894

 

 

 

836

 

 

 

780

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,095

 

 

 

1,049

 

 

 

993

 

Other departmental and support expenses

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

1,219

 

 

 

1,179

 

Management fees

 

 

222

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

181

 

Other property-level expenses

 

 

376

 

 

 

576

 

 

 

554

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

697

 

 

 

722

 

 

 

609

 

Corporate and other expenses

 

 

121

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

111

 

Gain on insurance settlements

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(2

)

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

4,697

 

 

 

4,405

 

OPERATING PROFIT

 

 

512

 

 

 

362

 

 

 

309

 

Interest income

 

 

4

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

20

 

Interest expense

 

 

(304

)

 

 

(373

)

 

 

(371

)

Net gains on property transactions and other

 

 

33

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

7

 

Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

 

 

3

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

3

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

 

 

(17

)

 

 

2

 

 

 

4

 

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

231

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

(28

)

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(31

)

 

 

1

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

210

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(27

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

11

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

325

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

(16

)

Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

1

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

 

$

321

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

(15

)

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.28

 

 

$

(.01

)

 

$

(.04

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

 

 

.02

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.09

 

 

$

(.02

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.28

 

 

$

(.01

)

 

$

(.04

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

 

 

.02

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.09

 

 

$

(.02

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

3,492

 

 

$

3,465

 

 

$

3,452

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,599

 

 

 

1,568

 

 

 

1,546

 

Other

 

 

339

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

323

 

Total revenues

 

 

5,430

 

 

 

5,350

 

 

 

5,321

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

893

 

 

 

902

 

 

 

924

 

Food and beverage

 

 

1,114

 

 

 

1,110

 

 

 

1,109

 

Other departmental and support expenses

 

 

1,306

 

 

 

1,295

 

 

 

1,264

 

Management fees

 

 

236

 

 

 

226

 

 

 

227

 

Other property-level expenses

 

 

382

 

 

 

386

 

 

 

377

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

724

 

 

 

708

 

 

 

693

 

Corporate and other expenses

 

 

106

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

43

 

Gain on insurance and business interruption settlements

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(10

)

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

4,746

 

 

 

4,719

 

 

 

4,627

 

OPERATING PROFIT

 

 

684

 

 

 

631

 

 

 

694

 

Interest income

 

 

3

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Interest expense

 

 

(154

)

 

 

(227

)

 

 

(207

)

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

253

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

236

 

Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

 

 

4

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(1

)

Equity in earnings of affiliates

 

 

21

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

29

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

811

 

 

 

574

 

 

 

755

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(40

)

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(14

)

NET INCOME

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

741

 

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS &

     RESORTS, L.P.

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

741

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

$

1.05

 

 

$

.76

 

 

$

.99

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

$

1.05

 

 

$

.76

 

 

$

.99

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

99



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

(16

)

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

(18

)

 

 

20

 

 

 

(27

)

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

1

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX

 

 

(21

)

 

 

13

 

 

 

(26

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

304

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

(42

)

Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

1

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

 

$

300

 

 

$

75

 

 

$

(41

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

NET INCOME

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

741

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income

     (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

(71

)

 

 

(60

)

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

7

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

19

 

Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

17

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX

 

 

24

 

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(41

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

795

 

 

 

508

 

 

 

700

 

Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST

     HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.

 

$

796

 

 

$

510

 

 

$

700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

100



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBISIDARIESSUBISIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)

 

Common OP Units Outstanding

 

 

 

 

General Partner

 

 

Limited Partner

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Non-controlling Interests of Consolidated Partnerships

 

 

Limited Partnership Interests of Third Parties

 

 

661.4

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

 

$

1

 

 

$

6,276

 

 

$

25

 

 

$

29

 

 

$

191

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(33

)

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27.3

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

460

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

1.3

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(99

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partnership interests of third parties

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

690.3

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

1

 

 

$

6,677

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

36

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(12

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.1

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(216

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

0.6

 

 

Redemptions of limited partnership interests of third parties

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

709.4

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

1

 

 

$

6,812

 

 

$

12

 

 

$

34

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(38

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.1

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the comprehensive stock and employee stock purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(346

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partnership interests of third parties

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

 

 

738.9

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

1

 

 

$

7,236

 

 

$

(9

)

 

$

34

 

 

$

190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common OP Units Outstanding

 

 

 

 

General Partner

 

 

Limited Partner

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Non-controlling Interests of Consolidated Partnerships

 

 

Limited Partnership Interests of Third Parties

 

 

738.9

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

1

 

 

$

7,236

 

 

$

(9

)

 

$

53

 

 

$

190

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(39

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(60

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the

     comprehensive stock and employee stock

     purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(567

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

0.3

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

739.9

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

1

 

 

$

7,385

 

 

$

(50

)

 

$

52

 

 

$

225

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

(78

)

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(71

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from Other

     Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.4

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

401

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the

     comprehensive stock and employee stock

     purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(599

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

0.1

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

Contributions from non- controlling

     interests of consolidated partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

(37.5

)

 

Repurchase of common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(675

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

734.5

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

$

1

 

 

$

7,170

 

 

$

(107

)

 

$

40

 

 

$

143

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

762

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

Other changes in ownership

 

 

 

 

 

(30

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation and other

     comprehensive income (loss) of

     unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivative

     instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from Other

     Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Common OP unit issuances

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

Units issued to Host Inc. for the

     comprehensive stock and employee stock

     purchase plans

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(630

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8

)

 

0.6

 

 

Redemptions of limited partner interests

     for common stock

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

(13.5

)

 

Repurchase of common OP units

 

 

 

 

 

(218

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

722.2

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

$

1

 

 

$

7,076

 

 

$

(83

)

 

$

39

 

 

$

165

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

101



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

(16

)

Net income

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

741

 

Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on dispositions

 

 

(97

)

 

 

(48

)

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

10

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

46

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

697

 

 

 

722

 

 

 

609

 

 

 

724

 

 

 

708

 

 

 

693

 

Amortization of finance costs, discounts and premiums, net

 

 

25

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

24

 

Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

13

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

2

 

Stock compensation expense

 

 

18

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

22

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

6

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

27

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(1

)

Net gains on property transactions and other

 

 

(33

)

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(7

)

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(253

)

 

 

(95

)

 

 

(236

)

(Gain) loss on foreign currency transactions and derivatives

 

 

(3

)

 

 

4

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

5

 

 

 

1

 

Gain on property insurance settlement

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(1

)

Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates

 

 

17

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(4

)

Equity in earnings of affiliates

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(76

)

 

 

(29

)

Change in due from managers

 

 

21

 

 

 

(42

)

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

(17

)

Distributions from investments in affiliates

 

 

29

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

7

 

Change in restricted cash for operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Changes in other assets

 

 

39

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

12

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

(34

)

Changes in other liabilities

 

 

(19

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

(56

)

 

 

(57

)

Cash provided by operating activities

 

 

1,019

 

 

 

781

 

 

 

662

 

 

 

1,303

 

 

 

1,159

 

 

 

1,140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of assets, net

 

 

643

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

467

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

497

 

Return of investments in affiliates

 

 

23

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

42

 

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(65

)

Acquisitions

 

 

(166

)

 

 

(441

)

 

 

(1,047

)

 

 

(63

)

 

 

(438

)

 

 

(138

)

Deferred sale proceeds received from HPT

 

 

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

 

Advances to and investments in affiliates

 

 

(74

)

 

 

(132

)

 

 

(49

)

Return on investment

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

Return on mortgage loan investment

 

 

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

1

 

Capital expenditures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Renewals and replacements

 

 

(303

)

 

 

(366

)

 

 

(327

)

 

 

(293

)

 

 

(383

)

 

 

(316

)

Redevelopment and acquisition-related investments

 

 

(133

)

 

 

(272

)

 

 

(215

)

 

 

(226

)

 

 

(275

)

 

 

(112

)

New development

 

 

(19

)

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13

)

Change in furniture, fixtures and equipment ("FF&E") replacement fund

 

 

(23

)

 

 

16

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

(31

)

 

 

(10

)

 

 

17

 

Change in restricted cash for investing activities

 

 

13

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

 

Property insurance proceeds

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

2

 

Cash used in investing activities

 

 

(75

)

 

 

(886

)

 

 

(1,576

)

 

 

(115

)

 

 

(732

)

 

 

(86

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing costs

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(18

)

 

 

(23

)

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(4

)

Issuances of debt

 

 

550

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

955

 

 

 

 

 

 

898

 

 

 

4

 

Draws on credit facility

 

 

393

 

 

 

231

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

734

 

 

 

845

 

 

 

4

 

Term loan issuance

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

Repayment on credit facility

 

 

(207

)

 

 

(89

)

 

 

(90

)

Repayment of credit facility

 

 

(816

)

 

 

(725

)

 

 

(225

)

Repurchase/redemption of senior notes

 

 

(801

)

 

 

(1,795

)

 

 

(404

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,001

)

 

 

(150

)

Mortgage debt prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(411

)

 

 

(113

)

 

 

(210

)

Scheduled principal repayments

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(5

)

Mortgage debt and other prepayments and scheduled maturities

 

 

(137

)

 

 

(35

)

 

 

(384

)

Issuance of common OP units

 

 

303

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

4

 

Repurchase of common OP units

 

 

(218

)

 

 

(675

)

 

 

 

Distributions on common OP units

 

 

(317

)

 

 

(190

)

 

 

(71

)

 

 

(603

)

 

 

(654

)

 

 

(475

)

Contributions from non-controlling interests

 

 

7

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Distributions to non-controlling interests

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(4

)

Change in restricted cash for financing activities

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

(493

)

 

 

(305

)

 

 

628

 

Other financing activities

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

7

 

Cash used in financing activities

 

 

(1,037

)

 

 

(857

)

 

 

(1,219

)

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash held

 

 

(7

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(8

)

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

444

 

 

 

(409

)

 

 

(287

)

 

 

151

 

 

 

(445

)

 

 

(173

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

 

417

 

 

 

826

 

 

 

1,113

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

666

 

 

 

839

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

 

$

861

 

 

$

417

 

 

$

826

 

 

$

372

 

 

$

221

 

 

$

666

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

102



HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(in millions)

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:

During 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, non-controlling partners converted common operating partnership units (“OP units”) valued at $6 million, $10 million, $3 million and $5$6 million, respectively, in exchange for 0.30.6 million, 0.60.1 million and 0.3 million shares, respectively, of Host Inc. common stock.

In March 2013,During 2015, holders of approximately $174$399 million of the 3.25%our 2.5% Exchangeable Senior Debentures due 2029 elected to exchangeconvert their debentures for approximately 11.7into 32 million shares of Host Inc. common stock. In connection with the debentures exchanged for Host Inc. common stock, Host L.P. issued 11.531.3 million common OP units.

In November 2012, we contributed land with a book value of $11 million and a fair value of $36 million to a joint venture with Hyatt Residential Group to develop a vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii. We recorded an initial investment of $8 million related to our 67% ownership in the joint venture and a gain of $8 million related to the portion of the land attributable to Hyatt Residential Group’s 33% interest, for which we received cash of $12 million.

In June 2011, holders of approximately $134 million of the 3.25% Exchangeable Debentures elected to exchange their debentures for approximately 8.8 million shares of Host Inc. common stock.  In connection with the debentures exchanged for Host Inc. common stock, Host L.P. issued 8.6 common OP units.

On June 28, 2011, we transferred the Le Méridien Piccadilly to the Euro JV Fund II at a price of £64 million ($102 million), including the assumption of the associated £32 million ($52 million) mortgage. We also transferred the capital lease asset and corresponding liability associated with the building, each valued at £38 million ($61 million), to the Euro JV Fund II. We retained a 33.4% interest in the property through our general and limited partner interests in the Euro JV Fund II and received cash proceeds on the transfer of £25 million ($40 million).

On April 29, 2011, we acquired a 75% controlling interest in the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed A$80 million ($86 million) of mortgage debt.

On March 17, 2011, we acquired the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego, and certain related rights. In connection with the acquisition, Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. issued approximately 0.3 million OP units valued at approximately $6 million.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

103101


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. operates as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, with its operations conducted solely through Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, operates through an umbrella partnership structure, with Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., a Maryland corporation, as its sole general partner. In the notes to the financial statements, we use the terms “we” or “our” to refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. together, unless the context indicates otherwise. We also use the term “Host Inc.” to refer specifically to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and the term “Host L.P.” to refer specifically to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. in cases where it is important to distinguish between Host Inc. and Host L.P. Host Inc. holds approximately 98.7%99% of Host L.P.’s partnership interests, or OP units.

Consolidated Portfolio

As of December 31, 2013,2016, the hotels in our consolidated portfolio are located in the following countries:

 

 

Hotels

 

United States

 

10089

 

Australia

 

1

 

Brazil

 

13

 

Canada

3

Chile

 

2

 

Mexico

 

1

 

New Zealand

7

Total

 

115

96

 

European Joint Venture

We own a non-controlling interest in a joint venture in Europe (“Euro JV”) that owns hotels in two separate funds. We own a 32.1% interest in the first fund (“Euro JV Fund I”) (11(3 hotels) and a 33.4% interest in the second fund (“Euro JV Fund II”) (8(7 hotels).

As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Euro JV hotels are located in the following countries:

 

 

Hotels

 

Belgium

 

31

 

France

 

43

 

Germany

1

Italy

3

Poland

 

1

 

Spain

 

2

 

Sweden

 

1

 

The Netherlands

 

21

 

United Kingdom

 

21

 

Total

 

19

10

 

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture

We have a 25% non-controlling interest in a joint venture in Asia (“Asia/Pacific JV”) that owns the 278-room Four Points by Sheraton, Perth, in Australia. The Asia/Pacific JV also has a non-controlling interest in a joint venture in India that is investing in seven hotels, two in Bangalore and five that are in various stages of development.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of Host Inc., Host L.P. and their subsidiaries and controlled affiliates, including joint ventures and partnerships. We consolidate subsidiaries when we have the ability

104


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance ofcontrol the entity. For the majority of our hotel and real estate investments, we consider those partnershipscontrol rights to be (i) approval or amendment of developments plans, (ii) financing decisions, (iii) approval or amendments of operating budgets, and joint ventures where we are the general partner, we review the rights of the limited partners to determine if those rights would overcome the presumption of control as the general partner. Limited partner rights which would overcome presumption of control by the general partner include the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause and substantive participating rights over activities considered most significant to the business of the partnership or joint venture, primarily voting rights.(iv) investment strategy decisions.

We also evaluate our subsidiaries to determine if they are variable interest entities (“VIEs”). If a subsidiary is a VIE, it is subject to the consolidation framework specifically for VIEs. Typically, the entity that has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance would consolidate the VIE. We consider an entity a VIE if equityequity investors own an interest therein that does not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or if such investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. We review our subsidiaries and affiliates at least annually to determine if (i) they should be considered VIEs, and (ii) whether we should change our consolidation determination based on changes in the characteristics of these entities.

102


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The ASU amends the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities (VIEs) and general partners' investments in limited partnerships and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Specifically, as a result of the elimination of the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and that these partnerships should be evaluated under the VIE or Voting Interest model, we re-evaluated the VIE determination of our non-wholly-owned partnerships. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2016, and applied the changes retrospectively. As a result, we no longer consolidate the partnership that owns the Fort Lauderdale Marriott Harbor Beach Resort & Spa, of which we are the managing partner and hold 49.9% of the partnership interests, due to the voting rights of the third-party owner. Accordingly, the operations, assets and liabilities of the hotel no longer are included in our consolidated financial statements. Instead, we have included our interest in the hotel based on the carrying amount on January 1, 2015 in advances to and investments in affiliates and our portion of the hotel’s earnings are recorded to equity in earnings of affiliates, with no cumulative-effect adjustment. As a result of the adoption of this ASU, total assets and total liabilities at December 31, 2015 were reduced by $128 million and $150 million, respectively. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, total revenues were reduced by $37 million and $33 million, respectively. Net income decreased by $6 million for both years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The deconsolidation of this entity had no effect on the total equity of Host Inc. stockholders, total Host L.P. capital or net income attributable to Host Inc. or Host L.P.

Additionally, three partnerships now are considered VIE’s, as the general partner maintains control over the decisions that most significantly impact the partnerships; however, this consideration did not change the consolidation determination.  This conclusion includes the operating partnership, Host L.P., which is consolidated by Host Inc., of which Host Inc. is the general partner and holds 99% of the limited partner interests. Host Inc.’s sole significant asset is its investment in Host L.P. and, consequently, substantially all of Host Inc.’s assets and liabilities represent assets and liabilities of Host L.P. All of Host Inc.’s debt is an obligation of Host L.P. and may be settled only with assets of Host L.P. We also determined that our consolidated partnership that owns the Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental, of which we are the general partner and hold 85% of the partnership interests, is a VIE. The total assets of this VIE at December 31, 2016 are $60 million and consist of cash and property and equipment. Liabilities for the VIE total $3 million and consist of accounts payable and deferred revenue. The unconsolidated partnership that owns the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, of which we hold 11% of the limited partner interests, also is a VIE. The carrying amount of this investment at December 31, 2016 is $(6) million and is included in advances to and investments in affiliates. The mortgage debt held by this VIE is non-recourse to us.  

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includesmay include reserves for debt service, real estate taxes, insurance, and furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement, as well as cash collateral and excess cash flow deposits due to mortgage debt agreement restrictions and provisions, and a reserve required for potential legal damages. For purposes of the statements of cash flows, changes in restricted cash caused by changes in required legal reserves are shown as operating activities. Changes in restricted cash caused by using such funds for furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement are shown as investing activities. The remaining changes in restricted cash are the direct result of restrictions under our loan agreements and are reflected in cash flows from financing activities.

Property and Equipment

Generally, property and equipment is recorded at cost. For properties we develop, cost includes interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction. For property and equipment acquired in a business combination, we record the assets based on their fair value as of the acquisition date. Replacements and improvements and capital leases are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.  We depreciate our property and equipment using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the useful lives of the related assets.

103


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We capitalize certain inventory (such as china, glass, silver, and linen) at the time of a hotel opening or acquisition, or when significant inventory is purchased (in conjunction with a major rooms renovation or when the number of rooms or meeting space at a hotel is expanded). These amounts then are then amortized over the estimated useful life of three years. Subsequent replacement purchases are expensed when placed in service.

We maintain a furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund for renewal and replacement capital expenditures at certainour hotels, which generally is funded with 5% of property revenues.

Impairment testing.  We analyze our consolidated properties for impairment throughout the year when events or circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We consider a property to be impaired when the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows over our remaining estimated holding period is less than the carrying value of the asset.asset. We test for impairment in several situations, including when a property has a current or projected loss from operations, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, or when other events, trends, contingencies or changes in circumstances indicate that a triggering event has occurred and the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For impaired assets, we record an impairment expense equal to the excess of the asset’s carrying value of the asset over its fair value. To the extent that a property has a substantial remaining estimated useful life and management does not believe that it is more likely than not that the property will be disposed of prior to the end of its useful life, it would be unusual for undiscounted cash flows to be insufficient to recover the property’s carrying value. In the absence of other factors, we assume that the estimated life is equal to the GAAP depreciable life because of the continuous property maintenance and improvement capital expenditures required under our management agreements. We adjust our assumptions with respect to the remaining useful life of the property if situations dictate otherwise, such as an expiring ground lease, or that it is more likely than not that the asset will be sold prior to its previously expected useful life. We also consider the effect of regular renewal and replacement capital expenditures on the estimated life of our properties, including critical infrastructure, which regularly is maintained and then replaced at the end of its useful life.

In the evaluation of the impairment of our assets, we make

105


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

many assumptions and estimates, including assumptions of the including:

projected cash flows, both from operations and from the eventual disposition, disposition;

the expected useful life and holding period of the asset, asset;

the future required capital expendituresexpenditures; and

fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates and comparable selling prices, as well as available third-party appraisals. During 2013 and 2012,

While we recognized impairment expensesconsider all of $1 million and $60 million, respectively, each on one property, which impairment expenses are included in depreciation and amortization, based on changes in estimated holding periods.

We perform a similar analysis for our equity method investments for impairment based on the occurrence of triggering events that would indicate thatabove indicators as preliminary indicators to determine if the carrying amount ofvalue may not be recovered by undiscounted cash flows, we reviewed the investment exceeds its fair value on an other-than-temporary basis. Triggering events can include a decline in distributableactual year-to-date and the projected cash flows from the investment,operations in order to identify properties with actual or projected annual operating losses or minimal operating profit as of December 31, 2016. The projected cash flows consider items such as booking pace, occupancy, room rate and property-level operating costs. As a change in the expected useful liferesult of our review, we identified no properties that required further consideration of property and market specific conditions or other significant events which would decrease the value of the investment. Our investments primarily consist of joint ventures which own hotel properties; therefore,factors to determine if it was impaired. If any properties had been identified, we generally will have few observable inputs and will determine fair value based on a discounteduse an undiscounted cash flow analysis, considering a range of RevPAR and operating margins compared to the investment, as well as consideration ofprior years’ operating results in evaluating the impact of other elements (i.e. control premiums, etc.). If an equity method investment is impaired and that impairment is determined to be other than temporary, an expense is recorded for the difference between the fair value andprobability-weighted projected cash flows from operations. To appropriately evaluate if the carrying value of the investment.asset is recoverable, we project cash flows at a stabilized growth rate over its remaining estimated life using assumptions and estimates that we believe reflect current market conditions. No impairment was recorded in 2016 and 2015. During 2014, we recognized impairment expense of $6 million on one property, which is included in depreciation and amortization.

Classification of Assets as “Held for Sale”.We will classify a hotel as held for sale when the sale thereof is probable, will be completed within one year and actions to complete the sale are unlikely are to change or that the sale will not occur. This policy is consistent with our experience with real estate transactions under which the timing and final terms of a sale are frequently not known until purchase agreements are executed, the buyer has a significant deposit at risk and no financing contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner. We typically classify assets as held for sale when all of the following conditions are met:

Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has approved the sale (to the extent that the dollar amount of the sale requires Board approval);

a binding agreement to sell the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash,cash; and no significant financing contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner.

104


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

no significant financing contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner.

If these criteria are met, we will cease recording depreciation and will record an impairment expense if the fair value less costs to sell is less than the carrying amount of the hotel. We will classify the impairment expense, together with the related operating results, including interest expense on debt assumed by the buyer or that is required to be repaid as a result of the sale, as discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of operations and classify the assets and related liabilities as held for sale on the balance sheet. Gains on sales of properties are recognized at the time of sale or are deferred and recognized as income in subsequent periods as conditions requiring deferral are satisfied or expire without further cost to us.

Discontinued Operations. We generally include the operations of a disposed hotel or a hotel that has been classified as held for sale in continuing operations, including the gain or loss on the sale, unless the sale represents a strategic shift that will have a major impact on our operations and financial results. We adopted this policy as of January 1, 2014, following the issuance of ASU 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360) - Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosure of Disposal of Components of an Entity, and no prior year restatements were permitted.

Asset retirement obligations.We recognize the fair value of any liability for conditional asset retirement obligations, including environmental remediation liabilities, when incurred, which generally is upon acquisition, construction, or development and/or through the normal operation of the asset, if sufficient information exists withwith which to reasonably estimate the fair value of the obligation.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. We depreciate our property and equipment using the straight-line method. Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of our assets and amortization expense for leasehold improvements is based on the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the related assets. The lives of the assets are based on a number of assumptions, including cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish the assets, as well as specific market and economic conditions. While management believes its estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income (loss) or the gain or loss on the sale of any of our hotels.

Intangible Assets and Acquired Liabilities

In conjunction with our acquisitions, we may identify intangible assets and liabilities. Identifiableother liabilities. These identifiable intangible assets and liabilities typically include above and below market contracts, including ground and retail leases and management and franchise agreements, which are recorded at fair value. These contract values are based on the present value of the difference between contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the contracts acquired and our estimate of the fair value of rates for corresponding contracts measured over the period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the contract. Intangible assets and liabilities are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining non-cancelable term of the related agreements.

Non-Controlling Interests

Other Consolidated Partnerships. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we consolidate fivefour majority-owned partnerships that have third-party, non-controlling ownership interests. The third-party partnership interests are included in non-controlling interest-other consolidated partnerships on the consolidated balance sheets and totaled $34$39 million and $40 million as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012. Two2015, respectively. One of the partnerships havehas a finite liveslife that terminate between 2081 andterminates in 2095, and the associated non-controlling interests are mandatorily redeemable at the end of, but not prior to, the finite life. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair values of the non-controlling interests in the partnerships with finite lives were approximately $68 million and $65 million, respectively.

Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests of consolidated partnerships is included in our determination of net income (loss). Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests of third parties is $4 million, $1 million and $(1) millionwas immaterial for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011, respectively.2014.

Host Inc.’s treatment of the non-controlling interests of Host L.P. Host Inc. adjusts the non-controlling interests of Host L.P. each period so that the amount presented equals the greater of its carrying value based on its historical cost or its redemption value. The historical cost is based on the proportional relationship between the historical cost of equity held by our common stockholders relative to that of the unitholders of Host L.P. The redemption value is based on the amount of cash or Host Inc. stock, at our option, that would be paid to the non-controlling interests of Host L.P. if it were terminated. We have estimated that the redemption value is equivalent to the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the OP units currently owned by unrelated third parties (one OP unit

106


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

may be exchanged for 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock) valued at the market price of Host Inc. common stock at the balance sheet date. Non-controlling interests of Host L.P. are classified in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet as they do not meet the requirements for equity classification because the redemption feature requires the delivery of registered shares.

105


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The table below details the historical cost and redemption values for the non-controlling interests:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

OP units outstanding (millions)

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

9.1

 

Market price per Host Inc. common share

 

$

19.44

 

 

$

15.67

 

 

$

18.84

 

 

$

15.34

 

Shares issuable upon conversion of one OP unit

 

 

1.021494

 

 

 

1.021494

 

 

 

1.021494

 

 

 

1.021494

 

Redemption value (millions)

 

$

190

 

 

$

158

 

 

$

165

 

 

$

143

 

Historical cost (millions)

 

 

95

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

90

 

Book value (millions) (1)

 

 

190

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

143

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)The book value recorded is equal to the greater of the redemption value or the historical cost.

(1)

The book value recorded is equal to the greater of the redemption value or the historical cost.

Net income (loss) is allocated to the non-controlling interests of Host L.P. based on their weighted average ownership percentage during the period. Net income (loss) attributable to Host Inc. has been reduced by the amount attributable to non-controlling interests in Host L.P., which totaled $4$9 million, $1$7 million and $(0.2)$9 million for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

Investments in Affiliates

Other-than-Temporary Impairment of an Investment.  We perform an analysis for our equity method investments for impairment based on the occurrence of triggering events that would indicate that the carrying amount of the investment exceeds its fair value on an other-than-temporary basis. Triggering events can include a decline in distributable cash flows from the investment, a change in the expected useful life or other significant events which would decrease the value of the investment. Our investments primarily consist of joint ventures which own hotel properties; therefore, generally we will have few observable inputs and will determine fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the investment, as well as consideration of the impact of other elements (i.e. control premiums, etc.). We use certain inputs, such as available third-party appraisals and forecast net operating income for the hotel properties, to estimate the expected cash flows. If an equity method investment is impaired and that impairment is determined to be other than temporary, an expense is recorded for the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the investment. No other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2016, 2015, or 2014.

Distributions from Investments in Affiliates

Affiliates.We classify the distributions from our equity investments in the statements of cash flows based upon an evaluation of the specific facts and circumstances of each distribution. For example, distributions from cash generated by property operations are classified as cash flows from operating activities. However, distributions received as a result of property sales are classified as cash flows from investing activities.activities.

Income Taxes

Host Inc. has elected to be treated as a REIT effective January 1, 1999, pursuant to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In general,It is our intention to continue to comply with the REIT qualification requirements and to maintain our qualification for taxation as a REIT. A corporation that elects REIT status and meets certain tax law requirements regarding the distribution of its taxable income to its stockholders as prescribed by applicable tax laws and complies with certain other requirements (relating primarily to the composition of its assets and the sources of its revenues) generally is not subject to federal and state income taxation on its operating income that is distributed to its stockholders. As a partnership for federal income tax purposes, Host L.P. is not subject to federal income tax. Host L.P. is, however, subject to state, local and foreign income and franchise tax in certain jurisdictions. In addition to paying federal and state income tax on any retained income, one of our subsidiary REITs is subject to a tax on “built-in gains” on sales of certain assets. Additionally, each of the Host L.P. taxable REIT subsidiaries is taxable as a regular C corporation, subject to federal, state and foreign income tax. Our consolidated income tax provision or benefit includes the income tax provision or benefit related to the operations of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, and state, local, and foreign income and franchise taxes incurred by Host L.P. and its subsidiaries.

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities.Under the partnership agreement, Host L.P. generally is required to reimburse Host Inc. for any tax payments it is required to make. Accordingly, the tax information included herein represents disclosures regarding Host Inc. and its subsidiaries. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existingexisting assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for net operating loss, capital loss, interest expense, and tax credit carryovers. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which such amounts are expected to be realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the new rate is enacted. However, deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies.

107106


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies.

GAAP prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a tax return. We must determine whether it is “more-likely-than-not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Once it is determined that a position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the position is measured at thethe largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement in order to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. This accounting standard applies to all tax positions related to income taxes.  We recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

Deferred Charges

Financing costs related to long-term debt are deferred and amortized over the remaining life of the debt using the effective interest method. These costs are presented as a direct deduction from their related liabilities on the balance sheets.

Foreign Currency Translation

As of December 31, 2013,2016, our international operations consist of hotels located in Australia, Brazil, Canada Chile,and Mexico, and New Zealand, as well as investments in the Euro JV and the Asia/Pacific JV. The financial statements of these hotels and our investments therein are maintained in their functional currency, which generally is the local currency, and their operations are translated to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rates for the period. The assets and liabilities of the hotels and the investments therein are translated to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are reflected in other comprehensive income (loss).

Foreign currency transactions are recorded in the functional currency for each entity using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured at period end exchange rates. The resulting exchange differencesdifferences are recorded in gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, except when recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) as qualifying net investment hedges.

Derivative Instruments

We are subject to market exposures in several aspects of our business and may enter into derivative instruments in order to hedge the effect of these market exposures on our operations. Potential market exposures for which we may use derivative instruments to hedge include: (i) changes in the fair value of our international investments due to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, (ii) changes in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt due to changes in the underlying interest rates, and (iii) variabilityvariability in interest payments due to changes in the underlying interest rate forof our floating-rate debt. Derivative instruments are subject to fair value reporting at each reporting date and the increase or decrease in fair value is recorded in net income (loss) or other comprehensive income (loss), based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We estimate the fair value of these instruments through the use of third party valuations, which utilize the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future cash receipts and the discounted future cash payments. Prior to entering into the derivative instrument, we evaluate whether the transaction will qualify for hedge accounting and continue to evaluate hedge effectiveness throughout the life of the instrument. Derivative instruments that meet the requirements for hedge accounting are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with offsetting changes recorded to net income (loss) or other comprehensive income (loss), based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to reflect, as applicable, our own nonperformance risk or the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative instruments for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and accumulated guarantees. The variable cash flow streams are based on an expectation of future interest and exchange rates derived from observed market interest and exchange rate curves. The values of these instruments will change over time as cash receipts and payments are made and as market conditions change.  

107


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the balance sheets are as follows (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Gain on foreign currency forward contracts

 

$

 

 

$

5

 

 

$

40

 

 

$

35

 

Loss on interest rate swap cash flow hedges

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(7

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

(7

)

 

 

11

 

 

 

(121

)

 

 

(137

)

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(9

)

 

$

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

$

(83

)

 

$

(107

)

108


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

There were no material amountsDuring 2016, we reclassified outa net loss due to foreign currency translation of accumulated$17 million that had been recognized previously in other comprehensive income (loss) to net income forupon the year ended December 31, 2013.sale of two hotels in Chile and four hotels in New Zealand. During 2012,2015, we reclassified a net gainloss due to foreign currency translation of $2$3 million that previously had been recognized in gain on foreign currency forward sale contractspreviously in other comprehensive income related(loss) upon the sale of the Delta Meadowvale Hotel & Conference Centre and three hotels in New Zealand. The losses were recognized as a reduction to two foreign currency denominated subsidiaries that were substantially liquidated during the year and recognized such gain in gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and derivatives on our consolidated statementsale of operations.assets.

Revenues

Our results of operations include revenues and expenses of our hotels. Revenues are recognized when the services are provided. Additionally, we collect sales, use, occupancy and similar taxes at our hotels, which we present on a net basis (excluded from revenues) on our statements of operations.

Fair ValueMeasurement

In evaluating the fair value of both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities, GAAP outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market assumptions based on market data (“observable inputs”) and a reporting entity’s own assumptions about market data (“unobservable inputs”). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability at the measurement date in an orderly transaction (an “exit price”). Assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 — Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 — Inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active (markets with few transactions), inputs other than quoted prices that are observableobservable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data correlation or other means.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflect our assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability when observable inputs are not available.

Host Inc. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Host Inc. common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, as adjusted for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of shares of Host Inc. common stock outstanding plus other potentially dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units and convertible debt securities. No effect is shown for any securities that are anti-dilutive.

109108


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share is shown below (in million,millions, except per share amounts):  

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

(16

)

Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

1

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Inc.

 

$

317

 

 

$

61

 

 

$

(15

)

Diluted income (loss) attributable to Host Inc.

 

$

317

 

 

$

61

 

 

$

(15

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

744.4

 

 

 

718.2

 

 

 

693.0

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1)

 

 

747.9

 

 

 

719.6

 

 

 

693.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.08

 

 

$

(.02

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

 

$

.42

 

 

$

.08

 

 

$

(.02

)

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net income

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

741

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling

     interests

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(9

)

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

 

762

 

 

 

558

 

 

 

732

 

Assuming conversion of exchangeable senior debentures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

Diluted income attributable to Host Inc.

 

$

762

 

 

$

558

 

 

$

759

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

743.0

 

 

 

752.4

 

 

 

755.4

 

Assuming weighted average shares for conversion of exchangeable senior debentures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.3

 

Assuming distribution of common shares granted

     under the comprehensive stock plans, less

     shares assumed purchased at market

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

1.1

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1)

 

 

743.7

 

 

 

752.9

 

 

 

786.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

1.03

 

 

$

.74

 

 

$

.97

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

1.02

 

 

$

.74

 

 

$

.96

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

There are 30 million, 40 million and 47were approximately 25 million potentially dilutive shares (on a weighted average basis) for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to our exchangeable senior debentures, and shares granted under comprehensive stock plans which were not included in the computation of diluted EPS as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period. The exchangeable senior debentures were redeemed in 2015 in exchange for 32 million shares.  

Host L.P. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Unit

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders by the weighted average number of common units outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders, as adjusted for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of common units outstanding plus other potentially dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include units distributed to Host Inc. to support Host Inc. common shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interests to common OP units and convertible debt securities. No effect is shown for any securities that are anti-dilutive.

109


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common unit is shown below (in million,millions, except per unit amounts):  

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

325

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

(16

)

Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

1

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host L.P.

 

$

321

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

(15

)

Diluted income (loss) attributable to Host L.P.

 

$

322

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

(15

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

738.4

 

 

 

713.3

 

 

 

688.9

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (1)

 

 

741.9

 

 

 

714.6

 

 

 

688.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.09

 

 

$

(.02

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.09

 

 

$

(.02

)

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net income

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

741

 

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling

     interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host L.P.

 

 

771

 

 

 

565

 

 

 

741

 

Assuming conversion of exchangeable senior debentures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

Diluted income attributable to Host L.P.

 

$

771

 

 

$

565

 

 

$

768

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average units outstanding

 

 

736.3

 

 

 

745.7

 

 

 

748.9

 

Assuming weighted average units for

     conversion of exchangeable senior debentures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.7

 

Assuming distribution of common units granted

     under the comprehensive stock plans, less

     units assumed purchased at market

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

1.0

 

Diluted weighted average units outstanding (1)

 

 

736.9

 

 

 

746.2

 

 

 

779.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

$

1.05

 

 

$

.76

 

 

$

.99

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

$

1.05

 

 

$

.76

 

 

$

.99

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

There are 29 million, 40 million and 46were approximately 25 million potentially dilutive units (on a weighted average basis) for the year ended December 31, 2015, related to our exchangeable senior debentures, and for units distributable to Host Inc. for Host Inc. shares granted under comprehensive stock plans which were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per unit as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period. The exchangeable senior debentures were redeemed in 2015 and Host L.P. issued 31.3 million units.  

Share-Based Payments

At December 31, 2013,2016, Host Inc. maintained two stock-based employee compensation plans. UponUpon the issuance of Host’s common stock under the compensation plans, Host L.P. will issue to Host Inc. common OP units of an equivalent value. These liabilities are included in the consolidated financial statements for Host Inc. and Host L.P.

We recognize costs resulting from Host Inc.’s share-based payment transactions over their vesting periods. We classify share-based payment awards granted in exchange for employee services either as equity-classified awards or liability-classified awards based upon cash settlement options. Equity classified awards are measured based on the fair value on the date of grant. Liability classified awards are remeasured to fair value each reporting period. Awards are classified as liabilities to the extent that settlement features allow the recipient to determine the percentage of the restricted stock awards to be withheld to meet the recipients’ income tax withholding requirements. As these awards vest over a one-year period ending December 31, the value is calculated as the estimated number of shares earned during the year multiplied by the stock price at year end, less estimated forfeitures. For performance-based awards, compensation cost will be recognized when the achievement of the performance condition is considered probable. If a performance condition has more than one outcome that is probable, recognition of compensation cost will be based on the condition that is the most likely outcome. No compensation cost is recognized for awards for which employees do not render the requisite services.

Effective January 1, 2017, we implemented a new stock-based employee compensation plan. Based upon the cash settlement options and in conjunction with the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, we anticipate that the awards under the new plan will be classified as equity. The plan includes awards that vest over a one-year, two-year and three-year period.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to cash held at various financial institutions, access to our credit facility, and

110


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

amounts due or payable under our derivative contracts. At December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, our exposure to risk related to our derivative instruments totaled $4$12 million and $14$17 million, respectively, and the counterparties to such instruments are investment grade financial institutions. Our credit risk exposure with regard to our cash and the $554 million available capacity under the revolver portion of our credit facility is spread among a diversified group of investment grade financial institutions. Following a repayment subsequent to year-end, we have $779 million available under our credit facility.

110


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Business Combinations

We recognize identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in a business combination at their fair values at the acquisition date based on the exit price (i.e. the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date). We evaluate several factors, including market data for similar assets, expected cash flows discounted at risk adjusted rates and replacement cost for the assets to determine an appropriate exit cost when evaluating the fair value of our assets. Property and equipment are recorded at fair value and such fair value is allocated to buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment using appraisals and valuations performed by management and independent third parties. Acquisition-related costs, such as due diligence, legal and accounting fees, are not capitalized or applied in determining the fair value of the acquired assets. Capital

Other items that we evaluate in a business combination include identifiable intangible assets, capital lease assets and obligations and goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets typically consist of assumed contracts, including ground and retail leases and management and franchise agreements, which are recorded at fair value. Capital lease obligations that are assumed as part of the acquisition of a leasehold interest are measured at fair valuedvalue and are included as debt on the accompanying balance sheet and we will record the corresponding capitalright-to-use assets. Classification of a lease assets.does not change if it is part of a business combination. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we may utilize a number of sources that arise in connection with the acquisition or financing of a property and other market data, including third-party appraisals and valuations. In certain situations, a deferred tax liability is recognized due to the difference between the fair value and the tax basis of the acquired assetassets at the acquisition date, which alsodate. Any consideration paid in excess of the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired would be recorded to goodwill. In very limited circumstances, we may result inrecord a goodwill asset being recorded.bargain purchase gain if the consideration paid is less than the net fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

2.

Property and Equipment

PropertyNew Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The new standard sets forth steps to determine the timing and equipment consistsamount of revenue to be recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects in exchange. In March, April, May and December 2016, the FASB issued ASUs Nos. 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-20, respectively, all related to Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which further clarify the application of the following (in millions)standard. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effectiveness of ASU No. 2014-09 to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and permitted early application for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The new standards can be applied retrospectively or under a modified retrospective approach. Based on our assessment of this standard, it will not materially affect the amount or timing of revenue recognition for revenues from room, food and beverage, and other hotel level sales; however, it may allow for earlier gain recognition for certain sale transactions under which we have continuing involvement. Upon adoption, we expect to implement these standards using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect recognized and no prior period restatements.

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Land and land improvements

 

$

1,973

 

 

$

1,996

 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

 

13,435

 

 

 

13,665

 

Furniture and equipment

 

 

2,223

 

 

 

2,227

 

Construction in progress

 

 

176

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

 

17,807

 

 

 

18,087

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(6,812

)

 

 

(6,499

)

 

 

$

10,995

 

 

$

11,588

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which affects aspects of accounting for lease agreements. Under the new standard, all leases, including operating leases, will require recognition of the lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees on the balance sheet. However, the effect on the statement of operations and the statement of cash flows largely is unchanged. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early application permitted. The standard requires a modified retrospective approach, with restatement of the periods presented in the year of adoption. The primary impact of the new standard will be to the treatment of our 26 ground leases, which represent approximately 85% of all of our operating lease payments. While we have not completed our analysis, we believe that the application of this standard will result in the recording of a right of use asset and the related lease liability of between $400 million and $500 million for the ground leases, although changes in discount rates, ground lease terms or other variables may have a significant effect on this calculation. As noted above, we expect that the adoption of this standard will have minimal impact on our income statement.

The aggregate costIn March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to simplify accounting for share-based payment transactions and will affect the classification of real estate for federalcertain share-based awards and related income tax purposeswithholdings. The standard is approximately $10.7 billion ateffective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2013.15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. As a result of the standard, we anticipate that the majority of our share-based payment awards granted in 2017 will be deemed equity-classified awards, and the excess tax benefits or deficiencies that are incurred based on the difference between the

111


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

intrinsic value of the award and the grant-date fair value will be recognized as income tax expense or benefit on the income statement. However, we do not anticipate that the implementation of this standard will have a material effect on our financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which requires that, on the statement of cash flows, amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending total amounts thereof. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash and furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund on our consolidated balance sheet will be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. These amounts totaled $175 million and $156 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change our balance sheet presentation. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We plan to adopt this standard beginning January 1, 2017.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The standard adopts a two-step approach, wherein, if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single (group of similar) identifiable asset(s), then the transaction would be considered an asset purchase. As a result of the standard, we anticipate that the majority of our hotel purchases will be considered asset purchases as opposed to business combinations, although the determination will be made on a transaction-by-transaction basis. This standard will be applied on a prospective basis and, therefore, it does not affect the accounting for any of our previous transactions. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted.

3.2.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Land and land improvements

 

$

2,047

 

 

$

2,044

 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

 

13,483

 

 

 

13,472

 

Furniture and equipment

 

 

2,377

 

 

 

2,283

 

Construction in progress

 

 

86

 

 

 

289

 

 

 

 

17,993

 

 

 

18,088

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(7,848

)

 

 

(7,505

)

 

 

$

10,145

 

 

$

10,583

 

The aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $10.6 billion at December 31, 2016.

112


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.Investments in Affiliates

We own investments in joint ventures that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The debt of the Euro JVEuropean, Hyatt Place, Harbor Beach and Asia/Pacific JVPhiladelphia Marriott Downtown joint ventures is non-recourse to, and not guaranteed by, us. The debtus, and a default of the debt does not trigger a default under any of our debt. As of December 31, 2016, 100% of the $9 million construction loan for the Maui JV and Hyatt Place JV is jointly and severally guaranteed by the partners of the joint ventures.venture. Investments in affiliates consist of the following (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

Ownership

 

 

Our

 

 

Our Portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

Interests

 

 

Investment

 

 

of Debt

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

Assets

 

Ownership Interests

 

 

Our Investment

 

 

Our Portion of Debt

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

Distributions received in 2016 (1)

 

 

Assets

Euro JV

 

32.1% - 33.4

%

 

$

374

 

 

$

444

 

 

$

1,363

 

 

Nineteen hotels in Europe

 

32.1 - 33.4

%

 

$

227

 

 

$

236

 

 

$

744

 

 

$

18

 

 

Ten hotels in Europe

Asia/Pacific JV

 

 

25

%

 

 

20

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

39

 

 

One hotel in Australia and a 36% interest in two operating hotels and five hotels under development in India

Asia/Pacific JV (2)

 

 

25

%

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

A 36% interest in five operating hotels and two hotels in final stages of completion in India

Maui JV

 

 

67

%

 

 

16

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

50

 

 

131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii

 

 

67

%

 

 

81

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, HI

Hyatt Place JV

 

 

50

%

 

 

5

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

24

 

 

One hotel in Nashville, Tennessee

Hyatt Place JV (3)

 

 

50

%

 

 

(12

)

 

 

30

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

17

 

 

One hotel in Nashville, TN

Harbor Beach JV

 

 

49.9

%

 

 

(24

)

 

 

75

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

6

 

 

One hotel in Fort Lauderdale, FL

Philadelphia Marriott

Downtown JV

 

 

11

%

 

 

(6

)

 

 

24

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

2

 

 

One hotel in Philadelphia, PA

Fifth Wall Ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate industry technology investment

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

415

 

 

$

500

 

 

$

1,476

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

286

 

 

$

392

 

 

$

1,215

 

 

$

52

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

Ownership

 

 

Our

 

 

Our Portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ownership Interests

 

 

Our Investment

 

 

Our Portion of Debt

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

Distributions received in 2015 (1)

 

 

Assets

 

Interests

 

 

Investment

 

 

of Debt

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

Assets

Euro JV

 

32.1% - 33.4

%

 

$

305

 

 

$

443

 

 

$

1,360

 

 

Nineteen hotels in Europe

Euro JV (4)

 

32.1 - 33.4

%

 

$

251

 

 

$

252

 

 

$

797

 

 

$

115

 

 

Ten hotels in Europe

Asia/Pacific JV

 

 

25

%

 

 

22

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

44

 

 

One hotel in Australia and a 36% interest in two operating hotels and five hotels under development in India

 

 

25

%

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A 36% interest in five operating hotels and two hotels under development in India

Maui JV

 

 

67

%

 

 

15

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

10

 

 

131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, Hawaii

 

 

67

%

 

 

72

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

131-unit vacation ownership project in Maui, HI

Hyatt Place JV

 

 

50

%

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One hotel under development in Nashville, Tennessee

 

 

50

%

 

 

3

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

8

 

 

One hotel in Nashville, TN

Harbor Beach JV

 

 

49.9

%

 

 

(21

)

 

 

75

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

8

 

 

One hotel in Fort Lauderdale, FL

Philadelphia Marriott

Downtown JV

 

 

11

%

 

 

(6

)

 

 

25

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

2

 

 

One hotel in Philadelphia, PA

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

347

 

 

$

461

 

 

$

1,414

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

324

 

 

$

412

 

 

$

1,269

 

 

$

133

 

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Distributions received were funded by cash from operations unless otherwise noted.

(2)

Distributions received from the Asia/Pacific JV in 2016 were primarily related to the sale of the Four Points by Sheraton Perth in 2015.

(3)

Distributions received from the Hyatt Place JV include $14 million of loan refinancing proceeds.

(4)

Ninety-two percent of the 2015 distributions received from the Euro JV were funded by proceeds from the disposition of nine hotels, discussed below, while the remaining was funded with cash from operations.

 

 

European Joint Venture

We own general and limited partner interests in the Euro JV that consists of two separate funds, with the other partners thereof includingbeing APG Strategic Real Estate Pool NV, an affiliate of a Dutch Pension Fund, and Jasmine Hotels Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the real estate investment company of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (“GIC RE”). We haveown a combined 32.1% ownership interest of Euro JV Fund I and a combined 33.4% interest of Euro JV Fund II. We do not consolidate the Euro JV due to the ownership structure and substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partners, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditures budgets. The joint venture agreement expires in 2021, subject to two one-year extensions. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the total assets of the Euro JV are approximately €1.9 billion ($2.6 billion).€1.5 billion. As asset manager of the Euro JV funds, we earn asset management fees based on the amount of equity commitments and equity invested, which in 2013, 2012 and 2011 were approximately $15 million, $13 million and $11 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2013, the partners have funded approximately €631 million, or 91%, of the total equity commitment for Euro JV Fund I and €369 million, or 82%, of the total equity commitment for Euro JV Fund II. On April 17, 2013 and June 25, 2013, the Euro JV partners executed amendments of the Euro JV partnership agreement in order to provide the funds necessary for a €95 million principal reduction associated with the refinancing of a mortgage loan secured by a portfolio of six properties, as well as to provide funds for general joint venture purposes, to extend the commitment period of Euro JV Fund I to December 2015 and to extend the commitment period of Euro JV Fund II by one year to June 2014 through the exercise of the extension option. The partners expect to utilize the remaining equity commitment for Euro JV Fund I for capital expenditures and financing needs.113

112


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

funds, we earn asset management fees based on the amount of equity invested, which in 2016, 2015 and 2014 aggregated approximately $8 million, $11 million and $16 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2016, the partners have funded approximately €463 million, or 67%, of the total equity commitment for Euro JV Fund I and €301 million, or 67%, of the total equity commitment for Euro JV Fund II. On August 29, 2013,June 27, 2016, the Euro JV Fund II acquired the 465-room Sheraton Stockholm Hotel in Sweden, for approximately €102 million ($135 million). In connection with the acquisition,partners amended the Euro JV entered into a €61 million ($81 million) mortgage loan with an interest rate of 5.67% that matures in 2018. We contributed approximately €14 million ($19 million)partnership agreement to extend the Euro JV in connection with this acquisition, funded through a draw on our credit facility.    

On October 22, 2013,equity commitment period for Euro JV Fund II sold the Courtyard Paris La Defense West – Colombesby one year to June 27, 2017. The remaining equity commitment for €19 million ($26 million) plus certain customary closing adjustmentsEuro JV Fund I is limited in its use to capital expenditures and recognized a gain of approximately €1.7 million ($2.3 million). In connection with the sale,financing needs.

Signification transactions for the Euro JV repaid the associated €10.4 million ($14.4 million) mortgage.  during 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

The Euro JV has €989 million ($1,363 million) of mortgage debt, including debt incurred in its recent acquisitions, all of which is non-recourse to us. A default ofDuring 2016, the Euro JV completed amendments to two of its mortgage debt does not trigger a default under any of our debt. On Juneloan agreements, extending their final maturity and reducing the overall weighted average interest rate by 20 2013,basis points.  

During 2015, the Euro JV refinanced asold nine properties for €526 million, repaid €229 million of mortgage loanloans secured by sixthe properties extending the maturity dateand distributed €328.5 million to 2016, with a one year extension option subject to meeting certain conditions.its partners. The loan has a fixed and floating rate component with an initial interest rate of 4.5%. In connection with the refinancing, the joint venture reduced the outstanding principal amount of the mortgage loan from €337earnings in 2015 include €39 million ($44643 million) related to €242 million ($320 million). We funded our portion of the principal reduction, as well as certain closing costs and other funding requirements, through a €37 million ($48 million) drawgains recognized on our credit facility.the sale of the nine properties.  

We have entered into fivefour foreign currency forward sale contracts in order to hedge the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in the Euro JV. The forward purchases will occur between May 20142017 and January 2016.2018. We have hedged €194€177 million (approximately $265$199 million) of our investment throughvia these contracts and designated draws under our credit facility in Euros. See Note 12 – “Fair Value Measurement” for further information.              

Our unconsolidated investees assess impairment of real estate properties based on whether estimated undiscounted future cash flows from each individual property are less than its carrying value. If a property is impaired, an expense is recorded for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the hotel. In 2013, we recognized an expense of approximately $15 million reflecting our share of the impairment of one such property in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates.

Asia/Pacific Joint Venture

We own a 25% general and limited partner interest in the Asia/Pacific JV, with the other partner thereof includingof which is RECO Hotels JV Private Limited, an affiliate of GIC RE. The Asia/Pacific JV may be terminated after a period of seven years, which occurs in March of 2015.by the partners at any time. Due to the ownership structure and the substantive participating rights of the non-Host limited partner, including approval over financing, acquisitions and dispositions, and annual operating and capital expenditureexpenditures budgets, the Asia/Pacific JV is not consolidated in our financial statements. The commitment period for the equity contributions to the joint venture expired in March of 2012. As a result, unanimous approval of the joint-holding companies is necessary to fund additional acquisitions.has expired. Certain funding commitments remain, however, related to its existing investments.investments in India.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Asia/Pacific JV partners have invested approximately $73$103 million (of which our share was $18$26 million) in a joint venture in India with Accor S.A. and InterGlobe Enterprises Limited, in which the Asia/Pacific JV holds a 36% interest. ThisOn November 3, 2015, the joint venture opened the Pullman & Novotel New Delhi Aerocity. As a result, this joint venture owns two hotels in Bangalore, one in Chennai, two in New Delhi and is developing fivetwo additional properties in Chennai and Delhi.the final stages of completion in Chennai. The hotels are or will be managed by AccorAccorHotels under the Pullman, ibis and Novotel brands.  

Other InvestmentsOn October 14, 2015, the Asia/Pacific JV sold the Four Points by Sheraton Perth for A$91.5 million and repaid A$43 million of mortgage debt. The Asia/Pacific JV recorded a gain on sale of approximately A$11 million ($8 million), of which our portion is included in the 2015 earnings.

Maui Joint Venture. On November 9, 2012, we entered intoVenture

We have a 67% non-controlling interest in a joint venture with an affiliate of Hyatt Residential Group (the “Maui JV”) to develop, sell and operatethat owns a 131-unit vacation ownership projectdevelopment in Maui, Hawaii adjacent to our Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa. WeSpa (the “Maui JV”). The project opened in December 2014. Since 2012, we have a 67% ownership interest incontributed approximately $87 million to the Maui JV, which is a non-controlling interest as a resultincludes the contribution of the significant economic rights held by the Hyatt member, which also is the managing member. The development costs are being funded with a $110 million construction loan and member contributions.land valued at $36 million.  As of December 31, 2013, $50.52016, approximately $9 million has been drawnwas outstanding on the construction loan. Thejoint venture’s construction loan, which is jointly and severally guaranteed by both partnersus and matures in December 2015. AsHyatt Hotels Corporation. Additionally, the joint venture has $32 million of December 31, 2013, we have contributed land valued at $36 million, approximately $8 million in pre-formation expenditures and additional capital contributions of $3 million. As of December 31, 2013,outstanding debt used to facilitate the book value of our investment in the Maui JV is $16 million, which represents our portionsales of the historical cost basis of the land plus the pre-formation expenditures and subsequent contributions.vacation ownership units, which is not guaranteed by us.

Hyatt Place Joint Venture. In May 2012, we entered into

We own a 50/5050% interest in a joint venture agreement with White Lodging Services to developthat owns the 255-room Hyatt Place Nashville Downtown in Tennessee for approximately $43 million, includingTennessee. In August 2016, the purchase of the land. The hotel opened in November 2013. TheHyatt Place joint venture has a $34.8refinanced its $31 million construction loan for this project, and aswith a new $60 million mortgage loan due August 2019, with two 12-month extension options. The loan bears interest at 1-month USD LIBOR plus 300 basis points, or 3.8%, at December 31, 2016. Upon repayment of Decemberthe construction loan, the partners were released of their guarantee on such loan.  

113114


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

31, 2013, $23.6

Harbor Beach Joint Venture

We have a non-controlling 49.9% interest in a joint venture with R/V-C Association that owns the 650-room Fort Lauderdale Marriott Harbor Beach Resorts & Spa in Florida. The joint venture has an outstanding $149 million was drawnmortgage loan with a maturity date of January 1, 2024. The loan bears interest at 4.75%. Only monthly interest payments are being made on this facility. Along with White Lodging Services, we have jointly and severally guaranteed the payment of the loan. The loan matures in May 2015. If the joint venture fails to perform onNo principal payments are due until the loan White Lodging Services and we are jointly and severally liable for the outstanding loan. Asmaturity date of December 31, 2013 we have invested cash of approximately $6 million for our investment in the joint venture. Due to the significant control rights of our partner, we do not consolidate the joint venture in our financial statements.January 1, 2024.

Combined Financial Information of Unconsolidated Investees

Combined summarized balance sheet information for our affiliates is as follows (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Property and equipment, net

 

$

2,480

 

 

$

2,289

 

 

$

1,634

 

 

$

1,708

 

Timeshare inventory

 

 

137

 

 

 

157

 

Other assets

 

 

376

 

 

 

312

 

 

 

514

 

 

 

538

 

Total assets

 

$

2,856

 

 

$

2,601

 

 

$

2,285

 

 

$

2,403

 

Debt

 

$

1,476

 

 

$

1,414

 

 

$

1,215

 

 

$

1,269

 

Other liabilities

 

 

135

 

 

 

164

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

302

 

Equity

 

 

1,245

 

 

 

1,023

 

 

 

751

 

 

 

832

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

2,856

 

 

$

2,601

 

 

$

2,285

 

 

$

2,403

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined summarized operating results for our affiliates is as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Total revenues

 

$

617

 

 

$

428

 

 

$

381

 

 

$

599

 

 

$

769

 

 

$

810

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

(473

)

 

 

(346

)

 

 

(294

)

 

 

(437

)

 

 

(558

)

 

 

(577

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(112

)

 

 

(56

)

 

 

(46

)

 

 

(73

)

 

 

(84

)

 

 

(99

)

Operating profit

 

 

32

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

134

 

Interest income

 

 

5

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(59

)

 

 

(43

)

 

 

(43

)

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(80

)

 

 

(86

)

Gain on disposition

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(25

)

 

$

(17

)

 

$

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain (loss) on dispositions

 

 

(2

)

 

 

141

 

 

 

12

 

Net income

 

$

35

 

 

$

191

 

 

$

60

 

115

114


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

4.

Debt

Debt consists of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Series Q senior notes, with a rate of 6¾% due June 2016

 

$

150

 

 

$

550

 

Series T senior notes, with a rate of 9% due May 2017

 

 

 

 

 

391

 

Series V senior notes, with a rate of 6% due November 2020

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

Series X senior notes, with a rate of 5⅞% due June 2019

 

 

497

 

 

 

497

 

Series Z senior notes, with a rate of 6% due October 2021

 

 

300

 

 

 

300

 

Series B senior notes, with a rate of 5¼% due March 2022

 

 

350

 

 

 

350

 

Series C senior notes, with a rate of 4¾% due March 2023

 

 

450

 

 

 

450

 

Series D senior notes, with a rate of 3¾% due October 2023

 

 

400

 

 

 

 

2004 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 3¼% due April 2024

 

 

 

 

 

175

 

2009 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 2½% due October 2029

 

 

371

 

 

 

356

 

Total senior notes

 

 

3,018

 

 

 

3,569

 

Credit facility revolver

 

 

446

 

 

 

263

 

Credit facility term loan due July 2017

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

Mortgage debt (non-recourse), with an average interest rate of 4.1% and 4.5% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, maturing through January 2024

 

 

709

 

 

 

993

 

Other

 

 

86

 

 

 

86

 

Total debt

 

$

4,759

 

 

$

5,411

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Series Z senior notes, with a rate of 6% due October 2021

 

$

297

 

 

$

297

 

Series B senior notes, with a rate of 5¼% due March 2022

 

 

347

 

 

 

347

 

Series C senior notes, with a rate of 4¾% due March 2023

 

 

446

 

 

 

445

 

Series D senior notes, with a rate of 3¾% due October 2023

 

 

398

 

 

 

397

 

Series E senior notes, with a rate of 4% due June 2025

 

 

496

 

 

 

495

 

Series F senior notes, with a rate of 4½% due February 2026

 

 

396

 

 

 

395

 

Total senior notes

 

 

2,380

 

 

 

2,376

 

Credit facility revolver

 

 

209

 

 

 

295

 

2014 Credit facility term loan due June 2017

 

 

500

 

 

 

499

 

2015 Credit facility term loan due September 2020

 

 

497

 

 

 

497

 

Mortgage debt (non-recourse), with an average interest rate of 3.4% and 4.7% at

     December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, maturing through November 2017

 

 

63

 

 

 

200

 

Total debt

 

$

3,649

 

 

$

3,867

 

 

Senior Notes

General. Under the terms of our senior notes indenture, which includes our Exchangeable Senior Debentures, our senior notes are equal in right of payment with all of our unsubordinated indebtedness and senior to all of our subordinated obligations. The face amount of our senior notes as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 was $3.1 billion and $3.6 billion, respectively.$2.4 billion. The senior notes balancebalances as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012 includes2015 are net of discounts and deferred financing costs of approximately $32$20 million and $56$24 million, respectively. We pay interest on each series of our senior notes semi-annually in arrears at the respective annual rates indicated in the table above.

Under the terms of the senior notes indenture, our ability to incur indebtedness and pay dividends is subject to restrictions and the satisfaction of various conditions. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we are in compliance with all of these covenants.

We completed the following senior notes transactions: in 2015:  

We redeemed $400 million ($200 million in June 2013 and $200 million in September 2013) of our 6¾% Series Q senior notes due 2016,

On May 15, 2015, we issued $500 million 4% Series E Senior Notes due June 2025 for an aggregate price of $404 million, using proceeds from debt issuances and asset dispositions. Subsequent to year-end, we redeemed the remaining $150 million of Series Q senior notes for an aggregate price of $152 million.

On March 19, 2013, we issued $400 million of our 3 34% Series D senior notes due October of 2023 for net proceeds of approximately $396 million. The net proceeds from the issuance of the Series D, together with cash on hand, were used to redeem the $400 million of our 9% Series T senior notes due 2017 at an aggregate price of $418 million in May 2013.

In March 2013, holders of $174 million face amount of our 314% exchangeable senior debentures (the “2004 Debentures”) elected to exchange their debentures for shares of Host Inc. common stock totaling approximately 11.7 million shares, rather than receive the cash redemption proceeds. In connection with the debentures exchanged for Host Inc. common stock, Host L.P. issued 11.5 million common OP units. The remaining $1 million of debentures were redeemed for cash.

On December 31, 2012, we redeemed $100 million of our 634% Series Q senior notes due 2016 for a redemption price of $102 million.

On August 9, 2012, we issued $450 million of our 434% Series C senior notes due 2023 for net proceeds of approximately $443 million. On September 5, 2012, a portion of the proceeds were used to redeem the $250 million of our 638% Series O senior notes due 2015 for a redemption price of $253 million and $150 million of our 634% Series Q senior notes due 2016 for a redemption price of $153 million.

115


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On August 27, 2012, we redeemed $400 million of our 638% Series O senior notes due 2015 with proceeds from our credit facility term loan at a redemption price of $404 million.

On April 16, 2012, the holders of $386 million face amount of 258% exchangeable senior debentures due 2027 (the “2007 Debentures”) exercised their option to require us to repurchase their debentures at par. We redeemed the remaining $2 million in October 2012.

On April 13, 2012, we redeemed $250 million of our 678% Series S senior notes due in 2014, and on May 29, 2012, we redeemed the remaining $250 million Series S notes for a total redemption price of $508 million.

On March 22, 2012, we issued $350 million of 514% Series A senior notes due 2022. Net proceeds of the offering of approximately $344 million, and available cash, were used to repay the $113 million loan with a 7.5% interest rate secured by the JW Marriott, Washington, D.C. on April 2, 2012, and to redeem $250 million of our 678% Series S senior notes, as noted above. The Series A senior notes were exchanged for Series B senior notes in October 2012. The terms of the Series B senior notes are substantially identical in all respects to those of the Series A senior notes, except that the Series B senior notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are, therefore, freely transferable by the holders.

Exchangeable Debentures. As of approximately $495 million, net of discounts, underwriting fees and expenses. Interest is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 31, 2013, we have $40015, commencing June 15, 2015. Net proceeds, along with cash on hand, were used on June 15, 2015 to redeem $500 million of 25 7/8% Series X Senior Notes due 2019 at an aggregate redemption price of $515 million.

On October 14, 2015, we issued $400 million of 4.5% Series F Senior Notes due February 2026 for proceeds of approximately $395 million, net of discounts, underwriting fees and expenses. Interest is payable semi-annually on February 12 and August 1, commencing February 1, 2016. Net proceeds, along with cash on hand and an additional $100 million draw on the credit facility, were used to redeem $500 million of 6% Series V Senior Notes due 2020 for $515 million in November 2015.

Exchangeable Debentures. In 2009, Host L.P. issued $400 million of 2½% exchangeable senior debentures outstanding(the “Debentures”). In October 2015, Host L.P. gave notice that were issued on December 22, 2009 (the “2009 Debentures”). The 2009 Debentures are equal in right of payment withit would redeem all of our other senior notes. Holders have the right to require us to purchase the 2009its currently outstanding Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount outstanding plus accrued interest (the “put option”) on October 15, 2015 and on certain other subsequent dates. Holders of the 2009 Debentures also have the right to exchange the 2009 Debentures prior to maturity under certain conditions, including at any time at which the closing price of Host Inc.’s common stock is more than 130% ($17.40) of the exchange price per share for at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days of the calendar quarter or at any time up to two days prior to the date on which the 2009 Debentures have been called for redemption. We can redeem for cash all, or part of, any of the 2009 Debentures at any time subsequent to October 20, 2015, at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest. If, at any time,As a result, we elect to redeem the 2009 Debentures and the exchange value exceeds the cash redemption price, we would expect the holders to elect to exchange the 2009 Debentures at the respective exchange value rather than receive the cash redemption price. The exchange value is equal to the applicable exchange rate multiplied by the priceissued 32 million shares of Host Inc.’s common stock. Upon exchange, the 2009 Debentures would be exchanged for Host Inc.’s common stock, cash, or a combination thereof, at our option. Based on Host Inc.’s stock price at December 31, 2013, the 2009 Debentures’ if-converted value would exceed the outstanding principal amount by $181 million. As of December 31, 2013, the closing price of Host Inc.‘s common stock exceeded 130% of the exchange price for more than 20 of 30 consecutive trading days. Therefore, the 2009 Debentures are exchangeable by holders through March 31, 2014. Currently, each $1,000 Debenture would be exchanged for 74.7034 Host Inc. common shares (for an equivalent per share pricestock upon exchange (including $8.7 million of $13.39),Debentures that holders had elected to exchange in July 2015) and redeemed approximately $1 million of Debentures for a total of 29.9 million shares.cash.

We separately account for the liability and equity components of our 2009 Debentures in order to reflect the fair value of the liability component based on our non-convertible borrowing cost at the issuance date. Accordingly, we record the liability components of the 2009 Debentures at fair value as of the date of issuance and amortize the resulting discount as an increase to interest expense through the initial put option date of the 2009 Debentures, which is the expected life of the debt. However, there is no effect of this accounting treatment on our cash interest payments. We measured the fair value of the debt components of the 2009 Debentures at issuance based on an effective interest rate of 6.9%. The initial allocations between the debt and equity components of the 2009 Debentures, net of the original issue discount, based on the effective interest rate at the time of issuance was $316 million and $82 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, the debt carrying value and unamortized discount were $371 million and $29 million, respectively.

Interest expense recorded for our exchangeable senior debentures (includingin 2015 totaled $21 million, including $8 million of cash interest expense and $13 million of non-cash discount amortization.

Authorization for debentures redeemedRepurchase of Senior Notes. In February 2017, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors authorized repurchases of up to $250 million of senior notes and mortgage debt (other than in 2013 and 2012) consists of the following (in millions):accordance with their terms).

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Contractual interest expense (cash)

 

$

10

 

 

$

19

 

 

$

31

 

Non-cash interest expense due to discount amortization

 

 

15

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

31

 

Total interest expense

 

$

25

 

 

$

36

 

 

$

62

 

Losses on the repurchased debentures are recorded in interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. We evaluated the fair value of the repurchased debentures based on the fair value of the cash flows at the date of the repurchase, discounted at risk

116


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

adjusted rates. Based on this calculation, the fair value of our repurchased debentures generally has been greater than the conversion price; therefore, substantially all of the repurchase price was allocated to the debt portion of the debentures.

Authorization for Senior Notes and Exchangeable Senior Debentures Repurchase. Host Inc.’s Board of Directors has authorized repurchases of up to $680 million of senior notes, exchangeable debentures and mortgage debt (other than in accordance with its terms), of which $530 million remains available under this authority following our senior notes redemption subsequent to year-end.     

Credit Facility. On November 22, 2011,June 27, 2014, we entered into a new senior revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A.N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and The Bank of Nova Scotia as co-documentation agents, and certain other agents and lenders. The amounts outstanding under the prior credit facility were transferred and remain outstanding. Based on our draws at December 31, 2013, we had $554 million of available capacity under our credit facility. The credit facility allows for revolving borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1 billion, including a foreign currency subfacility for Canadian dollars, Australian dollars, New Zealand dollars, Japanese yen, Euros, and British pound sterling and, if available to the lenders, Mexican pesos, of up to the foreign currency equivalent of $500 million, subject to a lower amount in the case of New Zealand dollar and Mexican peso borrowings. The credit facility also provides a subfacility of up to $100 million for swingline borrowings in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars, Euros and British pound sterling and a subfacility of up to $100 million for issuances of letters of credit. Host L.P. also has the option to increase the aggregate principal amount of the credit facility by up to $500 million, subject to obtaining additional loan commitments and satisfaction of certain conditions. The credit facility has an initial scheduled maturity date of November 2015,June 2018, with an option for Host L.P. to extendtwo six-month renewal options. The credit facility contained a term loan facility of $500 million, which replaced and refinanced the term loan under our prior facility of like amount. The term loan facility has an initial scheduled maturity of June 2017, with two one-year renewal options, resulting in a maturity for one additional year,the entire credit facility of June 2019, if all renewal options are exercised, subject to certain conditions, including the payment of an extension fee.fee and the accuracy of representations and warranties.

We hadpay interest on revolver borrowings under the following transactions under this credit facility during 2013at floating rates equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 87.5 to 155 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). We also pay a facility fee ranging from 12.5 to 30 basis points, depending on our rating and 2012 (drawsregardless of usage. Based on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating as of December 31, 2016, we are able to borrow at a rate of LIBOR plus 100 basis points and pay a facility fee of 20 basis points.

On September 10, 2015, we closed on a $500 million term loan (“2015 Term Loan”) by exercising the accordion feature of our existing credit facility.  The loan has a five-year maturity and its interest rate spread depends on our unsecured debt rating. Based on our unsecured debt rating at December 31, 2016, the loan has a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 110 bps (or approximately a 1.9% all-in interest rate). This increases our credit facility to $2 billion, consisting of the $1 billion revolver and two $500 million term loans.  On that same day, we drew $300 million on the 2015 Term Loan and drew the remaining $200 million on December 29, 2015. The proceeds were used for bridge financing to facilitate transactions are not includedrepay outstanding amounts on the revolver.

Net repayments under the credit facility were $82 million in 2016, while in 2015 we drew $120 million, net. As of December 31, 2016, we have $788 million of available capacity under the below discussion):revolver portion of our credit facility.

In 2013, we drew $68 million in net proceeds in Euros on the revolver portion of our credit facility, primarily to facilitate acquisitions and a debt refinancing through investment in the Euro JV.

In 2013, we also drew $118 million of net proceeds of the revolver portion of our credit facility in U.S. dollars (net of a $7 million repayment of our draw in Australian dollars) primarily to facilitate the redemption of the Series Q senior notes. Subsequent to year-end, $225 million was repaid on the revolver portion of our credit facility and we have $779 million of available capacity.

In July 2012, we drew $100 million in net proceeds on the revolver portion of our credit facility to facilitate the acquisition of the Grand Hyatt Washington.

In 2012, we also drew $42 million in net proceeds, in various currencies, including the Euro, Canadian dollars and Australian dollars, on the revolver portion of our credit facility, primarily to facilitate acquisitions through investments in our joint ventures.

On July 25, 2012, we entered into a $500 million term loan (“Term Loan”) through an amendment of our credit facility. The Term Loan has a five-year maturity and a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 165 basis points based on our leverage ratio, as defined in our credit facility, at December 31, 2013 (or approximately a 1.8% all-in interest rate).

Financial Covenants. The credit facility contains covenants concerning allowable leverage, fixed charge coverage and unsecured interest coverage (as defined in our credit facility). Currently,Currently, we are permitted to borrow and maintain amounts outstanding under the credit facility so long as our leverage ratio is not in excess of 7.25x, our unsecured coverage ratio is not less than 1.75x and our fixed charge coverage ratio is not less than 1.25x. The financial covenants for the credit facility do not apply when there are no borrowings under the credit facility.thereunder. Therefore, so long as there are no amounts outstanding, we would not be in default if we do not satisfy the financial covenants and we do not lose the potential to draw under the credit facility in the future if we were to regain compliance with the financial covenants. These calculations are performed based on pro forma results for the prior four fiscal quarters, giving effect to transactions such as acquisitions, dispositions and financings as if they had occurred at the beginning of the period. Under the terms of the credit facility, interest expense excludes items such as gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt, deferred financing charges related to the senior notes or the credit facility, amortization of debt premiums or discounts that were recorded at acquisitionissuance of a loan in order to establish the debt at fair value and non-cash interest expense due to the implementation in 2009 of accounting standards related to our exchangeable debentures, all of which are included in interest expense on our consolidated statementstatements of operations. Additionally, total debt used in the calculation of our leverage ratio is based on a “net debt” concept, under which cash and cash equivalents in excess of $100 million are deducted from our total debt balance. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we are in compliance with the financial covenants under our credit facility.

117


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Collateral and Guarantees. The credit facility initially does not include any subsidiary guarantees or pledges of equity interests in our subsidiaries, and the guarantees and pledges are required only in the event that Host L.P.’s leverage ratio exceeds 6.0x for two consecutive fiscal quarters at a time that Host L.P. does not have an investment grade long-term unsecured debt rating. In the event that such guarantee and pledge requirement is triggered, the guarantees and pledges ratably would benefit the credit facility, as well as the notes outstanding under Host L.P.’s senior notes indenture, interest rate and currency hedges and certain other hedging and bank product arrangements with lenders that are parties to the credit facility. Even when triggered, the guarantees and pledges only would be required by certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries of Host L.P. and a substantial portion of our subsidiaries would provide neither guarantees nor pledges of equity interests. As of December 31, 2013,2016, our leverage ratio was 3.2x.2.4x.

Interest and Fees. We pay interest on revolver borrowings under the credit facility at floating rates equal to LIBOR plus a margin. During 2013 and prior years, the margin ranged from 175 to 275 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s consolidated leverage ratio). Based on our leverage ratio at December 31, 2013 of 3.2x, we would be able to borrow at a rate of LIBOR plus 175 basis points. When using leverage-based pricing, to the extent that amounts under the credit facility remain unused, we pay a quarterly commitment fee on the unused portion of the loan commitment of 25 to 35 basis points, depending on our average revolver usage during the applicable period. On and after January 24, 2014, the date on which Host L.P. elected ratings-based pricing, the margin will range from 100 to 160 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). We also will pay a facility fee ranging from 15 to 40 basis points, depending on our rating and regardless of usage. Based on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating as of January 24, 2014, we will be able to borrow at a rate of LIBOR plus 125 basis points and pay a facility fee of 25 basis points. During 2013 and prior years, the interest rate margin on the Term Loan ranged from 165 to 265 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s consolidated leverage ratio). On and after January 24, 2014, the date on which Host L.P. elected ratings-based pricing, we will pay interest on the term loan at floating rates plus a margin ranging from 115 to 200 basis points (depending on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating). Based on Host L.P.’s unsecured long-term debt rating at January 24, 2014, the margin would be 145 basis points.  

Other Covenants and Events of Default. The credit facility contains restrictive covenants on customary matters. Certain covenants become less restrictive at any time that our leverage ratio falls below 6.0x. In particular, at any time that our leverage ratio is below 6.0x, we will not be subject to limitations on capital expenditures, and the limitations on acquisitions, investments and dividends contained in the credit facility will be superseded by the generally less restrictive corresponding covenants in our senior

117


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

notes indenture. Additionally, the credit facility’s restrictions on the incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends generally are consistent with our senior notes indenture.indenture for our Series D senior notes. These provisions, under certain circumstances, limit debt incurrence to debt incurred under the credit facility or in connection with a refinancing, and limit dividend payments to those necessary to maintain Host Inc.’s tax status as a REIT. Our senior notes and credit facility have cross default provisions that would trigger a default under those agreements if we were to have a payment default or an acceleration prior to maturity of other debt of Host L.P. or its subsidiaries. The amount of other debt in default needs to be aboveexceed certain thresholds in order to trigger a cross default and the thresholds are greater for secured debt than for unsecured debt. The credit facility also includes usual and customary events of default for facilities of this nature, and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default, payment of all amounts owed under the credit facility may be accelerated, and the lenders’ commitments may be terminated. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events of default, all amounts owed under the credit facility will become due and payable and the lenders’ commitments will terminate.

Mortgage Debt

All of our mortgage debt is recourse solely to specific assets, except for environmental liabilities, fraud, misapplication of funds and other customary recourse provisions. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we have 12 assets that aremortgage debt secured by mortgage debt,one asset, with an average interest rate of 4.1%3.4%, that mature between 2014 and 2024.which mortgage debt matures in 2017. Interest is payable monthly.quarterly. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we are in compliance with the covenants under all of our mortgage debt obligations.obligation.

We have made the following mortgage debt repayments since January 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

Transaction Date

 

Property

 

Rate

 

 

Date

 

Amount

 

Repayments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 2016

 

Novotel and ibis Christchurch

 

 

3.6

%

 

2/18/2018

 

$

(17

)

April 2016

 

Hyatt Regency Reston

 

 

3.5

%

 

7/1/2016

 

 

(100

)

March 2016

 

ibis Wellington

 

 

3.7

%

 

2/18/2018

 

 

(11

)

February 2016

 

Novotel Wellington

 

 

5.7

%

 

2/18/2018

 

 

(9

)

November 2015

 

Novotel Queenstown Lakeside

 

 

6.7

%

 

2/18/2016

 

 

(20

)

October 2015

 

Novotel Auckland Ellerslie and ibis

     Auckland Ellerslie

 

 

6.4

%

 

2/18/2016

 

 

(15

)

Aggregate Debt Maturities

Aggregate debt maturities are as follows (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

2017

 

$

562

 

2018

 

 

211

 

2019

 

 

 

2020

 

 

500

 

2021

 

 

300

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,100

 

 

 

 

3,673

 

Deferred financing costs

 

 

(23

)

Unamortized (discounts) premiums, net

 

 

(2

)

Capital lease obligations

 

 

1

 

 

 

$

3,649

 

 

118


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

We had the following mortgage debt issuances and repayments since January 2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

Transaction Date

 

Property

 

Rate

 

 

Date

 

Amount

 

Issuances/Assumptions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

December 2013

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

4.75

%

 

1/1/2024

 

$

150

 

June 2012

 

Hyatt Regency Reston (1)

 

 

3.3

%

 

7/1/2016

 

 

100

 

Repayments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 2013

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

5.55

%

 

3/1/2014

 

 

(134

)

December 2013

 

The Westin Denver Downtown

 

 

8.51

%

 

12/11/2023

 

 

(31

)

May 2013

 

Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

4.75

%

 

7/1/2013

 

 

(246

)

April 2012

 

JW Marriott, Washington, D.C. (2)

 

 

7.5

%

 

4/2/2013

 

 

(113

)

(1)

The floating interest rate is equal to 1-month LIBOR plus 310 basis points. The rate shown reflects the rate in effect at December 31, 2013. We have the option to extend the maturity for one year, subject to certain conditions.

(2)

We prepaid the mortgage including an exit fee of $1 million.

Aggregate Debt Maturities

Aggregate debt maturities are as follows (in millions):

 

 

As of

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

2014

 

$

332

 

2015 (1)

 

 

858

 

2016 (2)

 

 

408

 

2017

 

 

540

 

2018

 

 

-

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,650

 

 

 

 

4,788

 

Unamortized (discounts) premiums, net

 

 

(32

)

Fair value hedge adjustment

 

 

1

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

2

 

 

 

$

4,759

 

(1)InterestIncludes $225 million outstanding under the credit facility that was repaid in January 2014.

(2)Includes $150 million Series Q senior notes that were repaid in February 2014.

Interest

The following items are included in interest expense (in millions):

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013(1)

 

 

2012(1)

 

 

2011(1)

 

Interest expense

 

$

304

 

 

$

373

 

 

$

371

 

Amortization of debt premiums/discounts, net (2)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(18

)

 

 

(32

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

(10

)

 

 

(12

)

 

 

(11

)

Non-cash losses on debt extinguishments

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(4

)

Change in accrued interest

 

 

16

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

(4

)

Interest paid (3)

 

$

282

 

 

$

338

 

 

$

320

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015(1)

 

 

2014(1)

 

Interest expense

 

$

154

 

 

$

227

 

 

$

207

 

Amortization of debt premiums/discounts, net (2)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(16

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(8

)

Non-cash losses on debt extinguishments

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(2

)

Change in accrued interest

 

 

(3

)

 

 

12

 

 

 

1

 

Interest paid (3)

 

$

144

 

 

$

207

 

 

$

182

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Interest expense and interest paid for 2013, 20122015 and 2011 includes2014 include cash prepayment premiums of approximately $23 million, $21$30 million and $5$2 million, respectively.

(2)

Primarily represents the amortization of the debt discount on our Debentures, which is considered non-cash interest expense.

(3)

Does not include capitalized interest of $6$3 million, $6$5 million and $4$7 million during 2013, 2012for 2016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

119


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our debt repayments resulted in debt extinguishment costs included in interest expense for 2013, 20122015 and 20112014 of $36 million, $30$41 million and $9$4 million, respectively. No debt extinguishment costs were incurred in 2016.

Amortization of property and equipment under capital leases totaled $1 million, $1 million and $3 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and is included in depreciation and amortization on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

5.

Equity of Host Inc. and Capital of Host L.P.

Equity of Host Inc.

Host Inc. has authorized 1,050 million shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, of which 754.8 737.8 million and 724.6750.3 million were outstanding as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Fifty million shares of no par value preferred stock are authorized; none of such preferred shares were outstanding as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012.2015.

Capital of Host L.P.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, Host Inc. is the owner of approximately 98.7%99% of Host L.P.’s common OP units. The remaining 1.3%1% of Host L.P.’s common OP units are held by various unaffiliated limited partners. Each common OP unit may be redeemed for cash or, at the election of Host Inc., Host Inc. common stock, based on the conversion ratio of 1.021494 shares of Host Inc. common stock for each OP unit. In connection with the issuance of shares by Host Inc., Host L.P. will issue OP units based on the same conversion ratio. As of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, Host L.P. has 748.4had 730.8 million and 719.2743.7 million OP units outstanding, respectively, of which Host Inc. held 738.9722.2 million and 709.4734.5 million, respectively.

Repurchases and Issuances of Common Stock and Common OP Units

During 2013,On April 30, 2015, Host Inc. issued 16.9’s Board of Directors announced a program to repurchase up to $500 million shares of common stock, and again on October 29, 2015, to repurchase up to an additional $500 million of common stock. During 2016, we repurchased 13.8 million shares at an average price of $17.78 per share,$15.79 for net proceedsa total purchase price of approximately $297$218 million. These issuances were made in “at-the-market” offerings pursuantIn 2015, we repurchased 38.3 million shares at an average price of $17.64 for a total purchase price of approximately $675 million. The shares repurchased constitute authorized but unissued shares. As of December 31, 2016, the purchasing authority under the program has expired. On February 21, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a new program to Sales Agency Financing Agreements with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. In connection with therepurchase up to $500 million of common stock issuance, Host L.P. issued 16.5 million common OP units. These issuances completed the capacity under the current agreements.through December 31, 2017.

During March 2013, $174 2015, holders of $399 million of the 2004 Debentures were exchangedelected to exchange them for shares of Host Inc. common stock, totaling approximately 11.732 million shares. In connection with the exchange, Host L.P. issued 11.5 million common OP units.

In 2012, Host Inc. issued 17.5 million shares of common stock, at an average price of $15.67 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $271 million. These issuances were made in “at-the-market” offerings pursuant to Sales Agency Financing Agreements with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. In connection with the common stock issuance, Host L.P. issued 17.1 million common OP units.

Dividends/Distributions

Host Inc. is required to distribute at least 90% of its annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its stockholders in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to which we do not receive cash. Funds used by Host Inc. to pay dividends on its common stock are provided throughby distributions from Host L.P. The amount of any future dividends will be determined by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors.

The dividends that were taxable to our stockholders in 2013 were considered 96.5% ordinary income and 3.5% unrecaptured Section 1250 gain. All dividends that were taxable to our stockholders in 2012 were considered 100% ordinary income. None of such dividends was considered qualified dividends subject to a reduced tax rate.119

The table below presents the amount of common dividends declared per share and common distributions per unit as follows:

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Common stock

$

.46

 

 

$

.30

 

 

$

.14

 

Common OP units

 

.470

 

 

 

.306

 

 

 

.143

 

120


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The dividends that were taxable to our stockholders in 2016 were considered 66% ordinary income (non-qualified dividend income), 4% qualified dividend income, 24% capital gain distribution and 6% unrecaptured Section 1250 gain. The dividends that were taxable to our stockholders in 2015 were considered 80% ordinary income (non-qualified dividend income), 8% qualified dividend income, 5% capital gain distribution and 7% unrecaptured Section 1250 gain.

The table below presents the amount of common dividends declared per share and common distributions per unit as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Common stock

 

$

.85

 

 

$

.80

 

 

$

.75

 

Common OP units

 

 

.868

 

 

 

.817

 

 

 

.766

 

On February 18, 2014,21, 2017, Host Inc.’s Board of Directors authorized a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.14$0.20 per share on Host Inc.’s common stock. The dividend is payable on April 15, 201417, 2017, to stockholders of record on March 31, 2014.2017.

6.

Income Taxes

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year beginning January 1, 1999. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our stockholders, excluding net capital gain. As a REIT, generally we will not be subject to federal and state corporate income tax on that portion of our taxable income that currently is distributed to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal and state corporate income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes on our income and property, and to federal and state income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.

We have recorded a 100% valuation allowance of approximately $44$22 million against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss and asset tax credit carryovers as of December 31, 2013 with respect to our hotel in Mexico. There is a $4 million valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss and capital loss carryovers as of December 31, 2013 with respect to our hotels in Canada. There is a $3 million valuation allowance related to the net operating loss incurred by our office in Rio de Janeiro. Finally, there is a $10 million valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss carryovers as of December 31, 20132016 with respect to certainour hotel in Mexico. During 2016, we reversed the $3 million valuation allowance previously recorded against the deferred tax asset related to the net operating loss carryovers of our U.S. taxable REIT subsidiaries that acted as lessee pursuant to the terminated HPT leases.hotels in Canada. We expect that the remaining net operating loss and alternative minimum tax and investment tax credit carryovers for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be realized. The net decrease and the net increase in the valuation allowance for the year ending December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 20122015 is approximately $2$1 million and $16$22 million, respectively. The primary components of our net deferred tax assetassets are as follows (in millions):

 

As of December 31,

 

Deferred tax assets

2013

 

 

2012

 

Accrued related party interest

$

19

 

 

$

17

 

Net operating loss and capital loss carryovers

 

85

 

 

 

101

 

Alternative minimum tax credits

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

Property and equipment

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Investments in domestic affiliates

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Other

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

Deferred revenue

 

57

 

 

 

54

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

 

174

 

 

 

185

 

Less: Valuation allowance

 

(61

)

 

 

(63

)

Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

$

113

 

 

$

122

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

(21

)

 

 

(23

)

Investments in domestic and foreign affiliates

 

(6

)

 

 

(6

)

Other

 

(3

)

 

 

(3

)

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

 

(30

)

 

 

(32

)

Net deferred tax assets

$

83

 

 

$

90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2013, we have aggregate gross domestic and foreign net operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carryovers of approximately $250 million. We have deferred tax assets related to these loss and tax credit carryovers of approximately $85 million, with a valuation allowance of approximately $61 million. Our net operating loss carryovers expire through 2031, and our foreign capital loss carryovers have no expiration period. Our domestic alternative minimum tax credits have no expiration period and our foreign asset tax credits expire through 2017.

Our U.S. and foreign income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

U.S. income (loss)

$

213

 

 

$

(22

)

 

$

(60

)

Foreign income

 

18

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

32

 

Total

$

231

 

 

$

23

 

 

$

(28

)

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related party interest expense

 

$

 

 

$

7

 

Net operating loss and capital loss carryovers

 

 

43

 

 

 

63

 

Alternative minimum tax and investment tax credits

 

 

8

 

 

 

5

 

Property and equipment

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Investments in domestic affiliates

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

Deferred revenue and expenses

 

 

42

 

 

 

52

 

Foreign exchange net losses (AOCI)

 

 

12

 

 

 

18

 

Other

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

 

 

113

 

 

 

154

 

Less: Valuation allowance

 

 

(22

)

 

 

(23

)

Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

$

91

 

 

$

131

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(16

)

Investments in domestic and foreign affiliates

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(12

)

Other

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(30

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

71

 

 

$

101

 

120

121


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

At December 31, 2016, we have aggregate gross domestic and foreign net operating loss and capital loss carryovers of approximately $137 million. We have deferred tax assets related to these loss carryovers of approximately $43 million, with a valuation allowance of approximately $22 million. Our net operating loss carryovers expire through 2035, and our foreign capital loss carryovers have no expiration period. Our alternative minimum tax and investment tax credit carryovers have no expiration period. We believe that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize our total deferred tax assets, net of a valuation allowance of $22 million, of $91 million in the future.

Our U.S. and foreign income from continuing operations before income taxes was as follows (in millions):

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

U.S. income

$

763

 

 

$

530

 

 

$

738

 

Foreign income

 

48

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

17

 

Total

$

811

 

 

$

574

 

 

$

755

 

The provision (benefit) for income taxes forfrom continuing operations consists of (in millions):

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Current

—Federal

 

$

2

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

1

 

—Federal

 

$

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

3

 

—State

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

—State

 

 

1

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

2

 

—Foreign

 

 

9

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

8

 

—Foreign

 

 

12

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

15

 

Deferred

—Federal

 

 

4

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

(11

)

—Federal

 

 

24

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(1

)

—State

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(2

)

—State

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

—Foreign

 

 

1

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

2

 

—Foreign

 

 

(3

)

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(1

)

Income tax provision (benefit) – continuing operations

 

$

21

 

 

$

31

 

 

$

(1

)

Income tax provision – continuing operations

Income tax provision – continuing operations

 

$

40

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

14

 

 

The total provision (benefit) for income taxes, including the amounts associated with discontinued operations, was $26 million, $32 million, and ($2) million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

The differences between the income tax provision (benefit) calculated at the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% and the actual income tax provision (benefit) recorded for continuing operations are as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Statutory federal income tax provision (benefit) – continuing operations

 

$

81

 

 

$

8

 

 

$

(10

)

Adjustment for nontaxable (income) loss of Host Inc. – continuing operations

 

 

(77

)

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

State income tax provision (benefit), net

 

 

5

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(1

)

Provision for uncertain tax positions

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Foreign income tax provision

 

 

10

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

10

 

Income tax provision (benefit) – continuing operations

 

$

21

 

 

$

31

 

 

$

(1

)

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Statutory federal income tax provision

 

$

284

 

 

$

204

 

 

$

265

 

Adjustment for nontaxable income of Host Inc.

 

 

(260

)

 

 

(203

)

 

 

(268

)

State income tax provision, net

 

 

7

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Provision for uncertain tax positions

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

5

 

Foreign income tax provision

 

 

9

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

11

 

Income tax provision

 

$

40

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

14

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds received, was $17$15 million, $12$9 million, and $8$22 million in 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Balance at January 1

 

$

3

 

 

$

5

 

 

$

11

 

 

$

10

 

Reduction due to expiration of certain statutes of limitation

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

Other increases (decreases)

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

State decreases

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

Other increases

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Balance at December 31

 

$

5

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

11

 

 

$

11

 

 

All of such uncertain tax position amount,amounts, if recognized, would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision (benefit) calculated at the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% and the actual income tax provision (benefit) recorded each year.

We expect an increase to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of the reporting date of approximately $2 million. As of December 31, 2013, the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2010-2013.121

There were no material interest or penalties recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

122


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of December 31, 2016, the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2013-2016.

There were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

 

7.

Leases

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries Leases

We lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable REIT subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a REIT’s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel.

Vornado Lease

On July 30, 2012, we leased the retail and signage components of the New York Marriott Marquis to Vornado Realty Trust (“Vornado”). Vornado will redevelophas redeveloped and expandexpanded the existing retail space and a portion of the parking garage into a high-end retail space, as well as createcreated a six-story,25,000 square foot, block front, LED signage. The lease has a 20-year term and, over the term of the lease, each party has options that, if exercised, would result in ownership of the retail space being conveyed to Vornado at a price basedbased on the future cash flow of the leased property. Minimum rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The future minimum rental revenue under the non-cancelable lease is $12.5 million on an annual basis. Percentage rent is accrued when the specified income targets have been met.

Ground Leases

As of December 31, 2013,2016, all or a portion of 3626 of our hotels are subject to ground leases, generally with multiple renewal options, all of which are accounted for as operating leases. For lease agreements with scheduled rent increases, we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease. Certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts.    

Hospitality Properties Trust

We owned a leasehold interest in 53 Courtyard by Marriott and 18 Residence Inn by Marriott properties, which properties were sold to Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”) and leased back to us in 1995 and 1996. In connection with our conversion to a REIT, we entered into subleases with a subsidiary of Barceló Crestline Corporation (“Barceló”) for these properties and Barceló guaranteed rent payments to HPT as part of the sublease. We terminated the subleases effective July 6, 2010 and resumed acting as owner under the management agreements. Effective upon termination of the subleases, we recorded the operations of the hotels as opposed to rental income.     

We terminated the master lease with HPT on the 18 Residence Inn properties effective December 31, 2010 and received $17.2 million of deferred proceeds related to the initial sale and additional amounts held in the tenant collection account. We terminated the lease on the 53 Courtyard by Marriott properties effective December 31, 2012. At the expiration of the lease in 2012, HPT paid us deferred proceeds related to the initial sale of approximately $51 million. Approximately $11 million related to tenant collections accounts and $5 million for working capital were received in 2013.

Other Lease Information

We also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business, all of which we subsequently subleased. These leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options, generally for fivefive- or ten-year periods. The restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases. Our contingentcontingent liability related to these leases is $17$12 million as of December 31, 2013. However, management considers2016. We, however, consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote. Our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment, such as computer equipment, vehicles and telephone systems. Equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases, depending onupon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement. Equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease. The amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense.

123The following table presents the future minimum annual rental commitments required under non-cancelable operating leases for which we are the lessee (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

2017

 

$

43

 

2018

 

 

41

 

2019

 

 

38

 

2020

 

 

38

 

2021

 

 

37

 

Thereafter

 

 

1,264

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

1,461

 

Minimum payments for the operating leases have not been reduced by aggregate minimum sublease rentals from restaurants of approximately $7 million that are payable to us under non-cancelable subleases.

122


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following table presents the future minimum annual rental commitments required under non-cancelable leases for which we are the lessee (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Capital

 

 

Operating

 

 

 

Leases

 

 

Leases

 

2014

 

$

1

 

 

$

45

 

2015

 

 

1

 

 

 

43

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

41

 

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

1,591

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

2

 

 

$

1,804

 

Minimum payments for the operating leases have not been reduced by aggregate minimum sublease rentals from restaurants of approximately $5 million per year that are payable to us under non-cancelable subleases.

Rent expense is included in other property-level expenses on our consolidated statements of operations and consists of (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Minimum rentals on operating leases

 

$

50

 

 

$

117

 

 

$

114

 

 

$

45

 

 

$

46

 

 

$

47

 

Additional rentals based on sales

 

 

32

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

32

 

Rental payments based on real estate tax assessments

 

 

24

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

22

 

Less: sublease rentals

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(3

)

 

$

103

 

 

$

168

 

 

$

159

 

 

$

81

 

 

$

77

 

 

$

76

 

 

8.

Employee Stock Plans

Upon the issuance of Host Inc.’s common stock under either of the two stock-based compensation plans described below, Host L.P. will issue to Host Inc. common OP units of an equivalent value. Accordingly, these liabilitiesawards and related disclosures are included in both Host Inc.’s and Host L.P.’s consolidated financial statements.

Host Inc. maintains two stock-based compensation plans, the Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (the “2009 Comprehensive Plan”), under which Host Inc. may award to participating employees restricted stock awards of Host Inc.’sits common stock and options to purchase our common stock, and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). At December 31, 2013,2016, there were approximately 1814 million shares of Host Inc.’s common stock reserved and available for issuance under the 2009 Comprehensive Plan.

We recognize costs resulting from share-based payments in our financial statements over their vesting periods. No compensation cost is recognized for awards for which employees do not render the requisite services. We classify share-based payment awards granted in exchange for employee services as either equityequity-classified or liabilityliability-classified awards. EquityEquity-classified awards are measured based on their fair value as of the date of grant. In contrast, liabilityliability-classified awards are re-measuredre-measured to fair value each reporting period.

During 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of approximately $18$12 million, $16$11 million and $19$22 million, respectively. Shares granted in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 totaled 2.22.3 million, 1.8 million and 0.22.0 million, respectively, while 1.2 million, 0.90.8 million and 1.51.3 million shares, respectively, vested during those years.

124


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Senior Executive Plan

During 2013,2016, Host Inc. granted 1.71.6 million shares of restricted stock awards and 0.40.6 million shares of stock option awards, to senior executives (the “Annual Plan”)., which amount represents the maximum number of shares that can be earned during the year if performance is at the “high” level of achievement. The stock option awards have an average exercise price of $14.26 per share for performance year 2016. The restricted stock awards and stock option awards vest on an annual basis; therefore, no unvested awards were outstanding at December 31, 2013.2016.

Restricted stock awards

Vesting of restricted stock awards is based on (1) the achievement of relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) and (2) the company and the personal performance of employees attributable to specific management business objectives. Approximately 50% of the restricted stock awards are based on the satisfaction of the TSR compared to (i) the NAREIT index, (ii) the StandardsStandard & PoorPoor’s index, and (iii) a Selected Lodging Company index that serves as a relevant industry/asset specific measurement to our competitors, with the remaining 50% based on the achievement of management business objectives. Restricted stock awards granted to U.S. senior executives are classified as liability awards, due to settlement features that allow the recipient to have a percentage of the restricted stock awards withheld to meet income tax requirements in excess of the statutory minimum income tax withholding requirements. The fair value of these shares is adjusted at each balance sheet date and, at year end, is equal to the number of shares earned during the year at the December 31, 20132016 stock price. Of the awards granted in 2013, 93%2016, 99% were classified as liability awards. In contrast, restricted stock awards granted to senior executives operating out of our international offices do not have this settlement feature and are considered equityequity-classified awards. The fair value of these equityequity-classified awards is based on the fair value on the grant date, and is not adjusted for subsequent movements in fair value.

123


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, we recorded compensation expense of approximately $14 $10 million, $12$8 million and $15$18 million, respectively, related to the restricted stock awards to senior executives. The following table is a summary of the status of our senior executive plans for the three years ended December 31, 2013:2016:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

Balance, at beginning of year

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

$

11

 

Granted

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

17

 

Vested (1)

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

19

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

16

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

15

 

Forfeited/expired

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

19

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

16

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

15

 

Balance, at end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued in calendar year (1)

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(per share)

 

Balance, at beginning of year

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Granted

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

18

 

Vested (1)

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

19

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

24

 

Forfeited/expired

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

19

 

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

24

 

Balance, at end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued in calendar year (1)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

19

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Shares that vest at December 31 of each year are issued to the employees in the first quarter of the following year, although the requisite service period is complete. Accordingly, the 0.30.2 million shares issued in 20132016 include shares vested at December 31, 2012,2015, after adjusting for shares withheld to meet employee tax requirements. The shares withheld for employee tax requirements were valued at $5.5$2.4 million, $9.5$9.8 million and $15.4$6.1 million for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

Stock Option Awards

As of December 31, 2013, 0.72016, 1.3 million shares of stock option awards were outstanding and exercisable, with a weighted average remaining life of 8 years and a weighted average exercise price of $15.41$17.78 per share. During 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, stock option grants totaled 420,000, 201,000596,000, 366,000 and 22,000,393,000, respectively. Stock option compensation expense was $1.8$1.5 million $1.6 millionfor 2016, and $1.8 million during 2013, 2012for each of 2015 and 2011, respectively,2014, and all stock option awards outstanding as of December 31, 20132016 were fully vested. The stock option awards are equity-classified awards, as they do not include cash settlement features. We expense stock option awards over the vesting period based on the estimated fair value of the options at the grant date using a binomial pricing model. The utilization of the binomial model requires us to make certain estimates related to the volatility of the share price of our common stock, risk-free interest rates, the amount of awards expected to be forfeited, and our expected dividend yield. To calculate the fair value of stock option awards granted from 20112014 to 2013,2016, we assumed (i) a volatility ranging between 36%28% and 66%32%, (ii) a risk freerisk-free rate ranging between 1.0% and 2.2%1.8%, (iii) a dividend yield rangingof between 3.0%3% and 3.5%5%, and (iv) an expected life of 5.5 years.

Other Stock Plans

In addition to the share-based plans described above, we maintain an upper-middle management plan and an employee stock purchase plan. The awards are time-based equityequity-classified awards that vest within three years of the grant date and compensation expense is recognized over the life of the award based on the grant date fair value. Through the employee stock purchase plan, employees can purchase stock at a discount of 10% discount of the lower price of the beginning and ending stock price each quarter. During 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, we granted

125


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

118,000 shares, 116,000 shares 84,000 shares and 93,000118,000 shares, respectively, under both of these programs and recorded expense of $2.0$1.6 million, $1.9 million and $1.9$2.2 million, respectively.

9.

Profit Sharing and Postemployment Benefit Plans

We contribute to defined contribution plans for the benefit of employees who meet certain eligibility requirements and who elect participation in the plans. The discretionary amount to be matched by us is determined annually by Host Inc.’s Board of Directors. Our liability recorded liability for this obligation is not material. PaymentsPayments for these items were not material for the three years ended December 31, 2013.

10.

Dispositions

Discontinued Operations

We disposed of five hotels in 2013, three hotels in 2012 and one hotel in 2011. The operations for these hotels are included in discontinued operations. The following table summarizes the revenues, income before taxes, and the gain on disposals, net of tax, of the hotels which have been reclassified to discontinued operations, which includes assets held for sale and the results of sold hotels prior to their disposition for the periods presented (in millions):2016.

 

124

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Revenues

 

$

104

 

 

$

264

 

 

$

288

 

Income before taxes

 

 

22

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

11

 

Gain on disposals, net of tax

 

 

97

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Inc. is allocated between continuing and discontinued operations as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Continuing operations, net of tax

 

$

203

 

 

$

(10

)

 

$

(26

)

Discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

114

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

11

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Inc.

 

$

317

 

 

$

61

 

 

$

(15

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Host L.P. is allocated between continuing and discontinued operations as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

Continuing operations, net of tax

 

$

206

 

 

$

(9

)

 

$

(26

)

Discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

115

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

11

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host L.P.

 

$

321

 

 

$

62

 

 

$

(15

)

Dispositions in 2013 included (i) the Dallas/Addison Marriot Quorum by the Galleria for $56 million, (ii) the Four Seasons Hotel Atlanta for $63 million, (iii) the Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront for $87 million, (iv) The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco for $161 million, and (v) the Atlanta Marriott Marquis for $293 million.

In connection with the sale of The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco, we recorded a deferred gain of approximately $11 million, the recognition of which is subject to performance guarantees through which we have guaranteed certain annual net operating profit levels for the hotel through 2016, with a maximum payment of $4 million per year, not to exceed $11 million in total.

In connection with the sale of the Atlanta Marriott Marquis, we recorded a gain on the sale of approximately $19 million, net of $5 million deferred for an environmental contingency.

126


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Other Dispositions

During 2013 and 2012, we disposed of certain assets that do not result in reclassification of prior years’ operations to discontinued operations. These transactions included:

10.

On April 1, 2013, we sold approximately four acres of land adjacent to our Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa for $24 million and recognized a $21 million gain on the sale.

On November 9, 2012, in connection with the Maui JV, we sold land valued at $36 million to the joint venture and we recognized a gain of $8 million on the sale.Dispositions

We disposed of ten hotels in 2016, eight hotels in 2015 and five hotels in 2014. The following table provides summary results of operations for these hotels, which are included in continuing operations (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Revenues

 

$

58

 

 

$

214

 

 

$

353

 

Income before taxes and gain on disposal

 

 

10

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

27

 

Gain on disposals

 

 

243

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

229

 

Subsequent to year end, on January 10, 2014, we sold an 89% controlling interest in the entity that owns the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown. As a result, the hotel no longer will be consolidated in our financial statements. Due to our remaining 11% interest in the hotel, the operations of the hotel recorded prior to the sale will not be reclassified to discontinued operations.  Additionally, on February 12, 2014, we sold the Courtyard NashuaJW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa for $10 million.$172 million, including the $12 million FF&E replacement fund retained at the hotel. The hotel was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2016.

11.

Acquisitions

Business Combinations

We acquired one hotel during 2013 and recorded $1 million of acquisition related expenses and acquired one hotel during 2012 and recorded $6 million of acquisition-related expenses. Subsequent to year-end,On June 8, 2015, we acquired onethe 643-room Phoenician hotel for approximately $400 million and recorded $1 million of acquisition related expenses. For 2013 and 2012,Subsequent to year end, on February 16, 2017 we acquired the 347-room Don CeSar, including subsequent events, our business combinations were as follows:

On January 21, 2014, we acquired the 151-room Powell Hotel in San Francisco, California, including retail space and the fee simple interest in the land, for approximately $75the adjacent Beach House Suites for $214 million.

On May 31, 2013, we acquired the 426-room Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach in Honolulu, Hawaii for approximately $138.5 million, including a $0.5 million FF&E replacement fund.

On July 16, 2012, we acquired the 888-room Grand Hyatt Washington for approximately $400 million. In connection with the acquisition, we also paid $17 million, net, for the FF&E replacement fund, working capital and other assets.

Accounting for the acquisition of a hotel property or an entity as a purchase transaction requires an allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the transaction at their respective estimated fair values. The purchase price allocations are estimated based on current available information; however, we still are in the process of obtaining appraisals and finalizing the accounting for the acquisition of the Powell Hotel, which was acquired subsequent to year-end.The Don CeSar. The estimated fair value of the assets acquired related to this acquisition is $75 million;$214 million.

Asset Acquisitions

For 2016 and 2015, our other assets acquired and liabilities assumed are immaterial.asset acquisitions were as follows:

In October 2016, we purchased eight apartments at the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf for $4 million (A$5 million).

In July 2016, we purchased the ground lease at the Key Bridge Marriott for $54 million.

On December 30, 2015, we purchased the land under the Minneapolis City Center Marriott for $34 million.

In February 2015, we purchased the ground lease at the Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing, along with two out-parcels, for $4.6 million.

12.

Fair Value Measurements

Overview

The following table summarizes the estimatedOur recurring fair value measurements consist of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed forvaluation of our 2013 and 2012 hotel acquisitions (in millions):derivative instruments, all of which are designated as accounting hedges.  

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Property and equipment

 

$

138

 

 

$

409

 

Restricted cash, FF&E reserves and other assets

 

 

1

 

 

 

9

 

Total assets

 

 

139

 

 

 

418

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

139

 

 

$

417

 

127125


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Our summarized unaudited consolidated pro forma results of operations, assuming the 2013 and 2012 hotel acquisitions, including subsequent events, occurred on January 1, 2011 and excluding the acquisition costs discussed above, are as follows (in millions, except per share and per unit amounts):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Revenues

 

$

5,185

 

 

$

5,136

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

214

 

 

 

12

 

Net income

 

 

329

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host Inc.

 

$

321

 

 

$

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.27

 

 

$

.02

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.09

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.28

 

 

$

.02

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.09

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

.43

 

 

$

.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host L.P.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host L.P.

 

$

325

 

 

$

82

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.29

 

 

$

.01

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

$

.44

 

 

$

.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

.29

 

 

$

.01

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.10

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

$

.44

 

 

$

.11

 

For 2013 and 2012, we have included $109 million and $37 million of revenues, respectively, and $19 million and $6 million of net income, respectively, in our consolidated statements of operations related to the operations of the hotels acquired in 2013 and 2012.

New Development and Other Asset Acquisitions

For 2013 and 2012, our new development and other asset acquisitions were as follows:

On December 10, 2013, we made the final incremental payment of $19.9 million for the purchase of the fee simple interest in the land at the New York Marriott Marquis Times Square. In addition, $25 million of the payments made pursuant to the terms of the ground lease have been attributed toward the purchase of the land. The purchase was completed in conjunction with our 2012 lease of the existing retail space to Vornado Realty Trust and its on-going redevelopment.

On June 8, 2012, we acquired land and entered into a construction agreement to develop two hotels in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We have invested approximately R$94 million ($45 million) as of December 31, 2013. The hotels will be managed by Accor under the ibis and Novotel brands.

128


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.

Fair Value Measurements

Overview

Our recurring fair value measurements consist of the valuation of our derivative instruments, all of which are designated as accounting hedges. Non-recurring fair value measurements during 2013 and 2012 consisted of the impairment of two of our hotel properties.

The following table detailstables detail the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as well as non-recurring fair value measurements that we completed during 2013 and 2012 due to the impairment of non-financial assets (in millions):

 

 

Fair Value at Measurement Date Using

 

 

Fair Value at Measurement Date Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

Other

 

 

Significant

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward sale contracts (1)

 

$

12

 

 

$

 

 

$

12

 

 

$

 

 

Balance at

 

 

Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Fair Value at Measurement Date Using

 

 

2013

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

Foreign currency forward sale contracts (1)

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

$

17

 

 

$

 

 

$

17

 

 

$

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward sale contracts (1)

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired hotel properties held and used (2)

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value at Measurement Date Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

Other

 

 

Significant

 

 

Balance at

 

 

Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

December 31,

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

2012

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

 

$

7

 

 

$

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

 

Foreign currency forward sale contracts (1)

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap derivatives (1)

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-recurring Basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired hotel properties held and used (2)

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

These derivative contracts have been designated as hedging instruments.

(2)

The fair value measurements are as of the measurement date of the impairment and may not reflect the book value as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

Impairment

During 2013, we recorded an impairment expense of approximately $1 million related to the Courtyard Nashua. The fair value was based on expected sale proceeds of the property, which property was sold on February 12, 2014. During 2012, we recorded an impairment loss of $60 million related to The Westin Mission Hills Resort & Spa. We evaluated the recoverability of the hotel’s

129


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

carrying value assuming that it was more likely than not that the hotel will be sold before the end of its estimated useful life. Using an estimated undiscounted net cash flow, we concluded that the carrying value of the hotel was not fully recoverable. We estimated the fair value of the hotel using a discounted cash flow analysis, with an estimated stabilized growth rate of 3%, a discounted cash flow term of 10 years, a capitalization rate of 11%, and a discount rate of 12%. The discount and capitalization rates used for the fair value of the property reflect its heightened risk profile and are not indicative of our portfolio as a whole.

Derivatives and Hedging

Interest rate swap derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. We have designated our floating-to-fixed interest rate swap derivatives as cash flow hedges. The purpose of the interest rate swaps is to hedge against changes in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to fluctuations in variable rate debt. The derivatives are valued based on the prevailing market yield curve on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk when we calculate the fair value of the swaps. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) on the accompanying balance sheets. The hedges were fully effective as of December 31, 2013. The following table summarizes our interest rate swap derivatives designed as cash flow hedges (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Fair Value

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

Transaction

 

Notional

 

Maturity

 

Swapped

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

Date

 

Amount

 

Date

 

Index

 

All-in-Rate

 

 

2013

 

2012

November 2011 (1)

 

A$

62

 

November 2016

 

Reuters BBSY

 

6.7

%

 

$

1

 

$

(2)

February 2011 (2)

 

NZ$

79

 

February 2016

 

NZ$ Bank Bill

 

7.15

%

 

$

2

 

$

(1)

The swap was entered into in connection with the A$82 million ($71 million) mortgage loan on the Hilton Melbourne South Wharf.

(2)

The swap was entered into in connection with the NZ$105 million ($87 million) mortgage loan on seven properties in New Zealand.

Interest rate swap derivatives designated as fair value hedges. We have designated our fixed-to-floating interest rate swap derivatives as fair value hedges. We enter into these derivative instruments to hedge changes in the fair value of fixed-rate debt that occur as a result of changes in market interest rates. The derivatives are valued based on the prevailing market yield curve on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk in the calculation of the fair value of the swaps. The changes in the fair value of the derivatives are largely offset by corresponding changes in the fair value of the underlying debt due to changes in the 3-month LIBOR rate, which change is recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the debt. Any difference between the change in the fair value of the swap and the change in the fair value in the underlying debt, which was not significant for the periods presented, is considered the ineffective portion of the hedging relationship and is recognized in net income (loss).

We have three fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount totaling $300 million. We pay a floating interest rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR plus a spread which ranges from 2.7% to 3.2%, as opposed to the fixed rate of 5.531%, on the notional amount of $300 million through March 1, 2014. During 2013 and 2012, the fair value of the swaps decreased $6 million and $4 million, respectively.  

Foreign Investment Hedging Instruments. We have fivesix foreign currencycurrency forward sale contracts that hedge a portion of the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in foreign operations. These derivatives are considered hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation and are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) within the equity portion of our balance sheet. The foreign currency forward sale contracts are valued based on the forward yield curve of the foreign currency to U.S. dollar forward exchange rate on the date of measurement. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk when we calculate the fair value of the derivatives.

During 2016, in connection with the maturity of foreign currency forward sale contracts with a total notional amount of C$25 million and 30 million, for which we received total proceeds of approximately $11 million, we entered into new foreign currency forward sale contracts with the same notional amounts. We also entered into a new foreign currency forward sale contract with a total notional amount of NZ$45 million. The gain related to the matured contracts is included in accumulated other comprehensive income and will be recognized in earnings when our investments have been repatriated.

The following table summarizes our foreign currency forward sale contracts (in millions):

 

Currently Outstanding

 

Change in Fair Value - All Contracts

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount in

 

 

Transaction

 

 

Forward

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Transaction

 

Foreign

 

 

Amount

 

 

Purchase

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Date Range

 

Currency

 

 

in Dollars

 

 

Date Range

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

May 2008-January 2013

 

120

 

 

$

163

 

 

May 2014-January 2016

 

$

(5

)

 

$

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currently Outstanding

 

Change in Fair Value - All Contracts

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaction

Amount in

 

 

Total

Transaction

 

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Transaction Date

 

Foreign

 

 

Amount

 

 

Forward Purchase

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Range

 

Currency

 

 

in Dollars

 

 

Date Range

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

May 2014-January 2016

 

 

100

 

 

$

118

 

 

May 2017-January 2018

 

$

5

 

 

$

13

 

November 2016

 

C$

 

25

 

 

$

19

 

 

November 2018

 

$

 

 

$

3

 

November 2016

 

NZ$

 

45

 

 

$

32

 

 

February 2017

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

 

130126


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

In addition to the foreign currency forward sale contracts, we have designated a portion of the foreign currency draws on our credit facility as hedges of net investments in foreign operations. As a result, currency translation adjustments in the designated credit facility draws are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) within the equity portion of our balance sheet, which adjustments offset a portion of the translation adjustment related to our foreign investments. The following table summarizes the draws on our credit facility that are designated as hedges of net investments in international operations (in millions):

 

 

Balance

 

Balance

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Balance

Balance

 

 

 

Gain (Loss)

 

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding in

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Outstanding

 

 

Outstanding in

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

Currency

 

US$

 

Foreign Currency

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

US$

 

 

Foreign Currency

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

Canadian dollars (1)

 

$

29

 

C$

31

 

$

2

 

$

 

$

 

34

 

 

C$

 

46

 

 

$

 

(1

)

 

$

 

5

 

Euros

 

$

102

 

74

 

$

(5)

 

$

(2)

 

$

 

81

 

 

 

77

 

 

$

 

3

 

 

$

 

10

 

Australian dollars

 

$

 

36

 

 

A$

 

50

 

 

$

 

2

 

 

$

 

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

We have drawn an additional $71$45 million on the credit facility in Canadian dollars that has not been designated as a hedging instrument.

Other Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value of Other Financial Assets and Liabilities. We did not elect the fair value measurement option for any of our other financial assets or liabilities. The fair values of secured debt and our credit facility are determined based on the expected future payments discounted at risk-adjusted rates. Senior Notes and the Exchangeable Senior Debenturesnotes are valued based on quoted market prices. The fair values of financial instruments not included in this table are estimated to be equal to their carrying amounts. The fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities and other financial instruments areis shown below (in millions):

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Fair

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Fair

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

Amount

 

 

Value

 

 

Amount

 

 

Value

 

 

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes (Level 1)

 

$

2,647

 

 

$

2,766

 

 

$

3,038

 

 

$

3,296

 

 

$

2,380

 

 

$

2,477

 

 

$

2,376

 

 

$

2,452

 

Exchangeable Senior Debentures (Level 1)

 

 

371

 

 

 

603

 

 

 

531

 

 

 

725

 

Credit facility (Level 2)

 

 

946

 

 

 

946

 

 

 

763

 

 

 

763

 

 

 

1,206

 

 

 

1,211

 

 

 

1,291

 

 

 

1,298

 

Mortgage debt and other, excluding capital leases (Level 2)

 

 

793

 

 

 

802

 

 

 

1,078

 

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

199

 

 

13.

Gain on Insurance SettlementsRelationship with Marriott International

On February 22, 2011, Christchurch, New Zealand experienced an earthquake that resulted in substantial damage toWe have entered into various agreements with Marriott, including for the Hotel Novotel Christchurch Cathedral Square and the Hotel ibis Christchurch. The ibis reopened in September 2012 and the Novotel reopened in August 2013; however, the historic portionmanagement of the Novotel, the Warners building, has been demolished and is not expected to be replaced. We believe the insurance coverage provided by our property manager will be able to cover to the majorityapproximately 77% of our insured claimshotels (as measured by revenues), the partnership agreement for both propertythe JW Marriott Hotel Mexico City, Mexico and business interruption. We recorded a loss of $3certain limited administrative services.

In 2016, 2015 and 2014, we paid Marriott $159 million, which represents the estimated deductible under our insurance policy in the second quarter of 2011.

We estimated that we incurred approximately $33 million of property damage, which amount represents the book value of the properties and equipment written off less any deductible, and the related repairs and clean-up costs incurred. Any gains resulting from insurance proceeds are not recognized until all contingencies are resolved. During 2012 and 2011, we recognized a gain of $9$138 million and $2$142 million, respectively, for the receipt of business interruption insurance proceeds. Ashotel management fees and approximately $4.6 million, $2.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of December 31, 2013 we have agreed upon settlement amounts with our primary insurer for all property and business interruption insurance, except for real property damage to the Warners building. While the primary insurer has recognized its liability with regard to the Warners building, there is no agreed settlement amount for real property damage to the Warners building as the ground lessor has filed suit to recover a portion of the insurance proceeds from the primary insurer for the hotel. While we can provide no assurance as to the timing of when this dispute will be settled, we believe that it is more likely than not that we will recover the full value of our insurance receivable. In addition, we have made a separate claim for reimbursement under our corporate policy, though we have not recorded any additional amounts of insurance receivable with regard to this claim. We have received $21 million of cash for property insurance and have an outstanding insurance receivable of $8 million which is included in other assets, representing the remaining claims for property damage.

131


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSfranchise fees.

 

14.

Hotel Management Agreements and Operating and License Agreements

All of our hotels are managed by third parties pursuant to management or operating agreements, with some of our hotels also being subject to separate license agreements addressing matters pertaining to operation under the designated brand. The hotel brands of three of our managers,Properties managed by Marriott Starwood and Hyatt represent 58%, 24%77% and 12%13% of our total revenues, respectively. Under these agreements, the managers generally have sole responsibility for all activities necessary for the day-to-day operation of the hotels, including establishing room rates, processing reservations and promoting and publicizing the hotels. The managers also provide all employees for the hotels, prepare reports, budgets and projections, and provide other administrative and accounting support services to the hotels. For the majority of our properties, weWe have approval rights over budgets, capital expenditures, significant leases and contractual commitments, and various other matters.

The initial term of our agreements generally is 1510 to 25 years, with one or more renewal terms at the option of the manager. The majority of our agreements condition the manager’s right to exercise options for renewal upon the satisfaction of specified economic performance criteria. The manager typically receives a base management fee, which is calculatedcalculated as a percentage (generally 2-3%) of annual gross revenues, and an incentive management fee, which typically is calculated as a percentage (generally 10-20%) of

127


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

operating profit after the owner has received a priority return on its investment. In the case of our Starwood-managed hotels operating under the W®, Westin®, Sheraton®, Luxury Collection® and St. Regis® brands and managed by Marriott following its acquisition of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. on September 23, 2016, the base management fee only is 1% of annual gross revenues, but that amount is supplemented by license fees payable to StarwoodMarriott under a separate license agreement pertaining to the designated brand, including rights to use trademarks, service marks and logos, matters relating to compliance with certain brand standards and policies, and the provision of certain system programs and centralized services. Under the license agreement, StarwoodMarriott generally receives 5% of gross revenues attributable to room sales and 2% of gross revenues attributable to food and beverage sales in addition to athe base management fee.

As part of the agreements, the manager furnishes the hotels with certain chain services, which generally are provided on a central or regional basis to all hotels in the manager’s hotel system. Chain services include central training, advertising and promotion, national reservation systems, computerized payroll and accounting services, and such additional services as needed which may be more efficiently performed on a centralized basis. Costs and expenses incurred in providing such services are allocated among the hotels managed, owned or leased by the manager on a fair and equitable basis. In addition, our managers generally will sponsor a guest rewards program, the costs of which will be charged to all of the hotels that participate in such program.

We are obligated to provide the manager with sufficient funds, generally 5% of the revenue generated at the hotel, to cover the cost of (a) certain non-routine repairs and maintenance to the hotels which normally are capitalized, and (b) replacements and renewals to the hotels’ furniture, fixtures and equipment. Under certain circumstances, we will be required to establish escrow accounts for such purposes under terms outlined in the agreements.

We generally are limited in our ability to sell, lease or otherwise transfer the hotels unless the transferee assumes the related management agreement. However, most agreements include owner rights to terminate the agreements on the basis of the manager’s failure to meet certaincertain performance-based metrics. Typically, these criteria are subject to the manager’s ability to ‘cure’ and avoid termination by payment to us of specified deficiency amounts (or, in some instances, waiver of the right to receive specified future management fees).

In addition to any performance-based or other termination rights, we have negotiated with Marriott Starwood and some of our other managers specific termination rights related to specific agreements. These termination rights can take a number of different forms, including termination of agreements upon sale that leave the property unencumbered by any agreement; termination upon sale provided that the property continues to be operated under a license or franchise agreement with continued brand affiliation; as well as termination without sale or other condition, which may require the payment of a fee. These termination rights also may restrict the number of agreements that may be terminated over any annual or other period; impose limitations on the number of agreements terminated as measured by EBITDA; require that a certain number of properties continue to maintain the brand affiliation; or be restricted to a specific pool of assets.

132


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

15.

Geographic and Business Segment Information

We consider each one of our hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a reportable segment. We also allocate resources and assess operating performance based on individual hotels. All of our other real estate investment activities (primarily our retail and office buildings)spaces) are immaterial and, with our operating segments, meet the aggregation criteria, and thus, we report one segment: hotel ownership. Our international operations consist of hotels in six countries.four countries as of December 31, 2016. There were no intersegment sales during the periods presented. The following table presents revenues and long-lived assets for each of the geographical areas in which we operate (in millions):

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

Property and

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Revenues

 

 

Equipment, net

 

 

Revenues

 

 

Equipment, net

 

 

Revenues

 

 

Equipment, net

 

 

Revenues

 

 

Property and

Equipment, net

 

 

Revenues

 

 

Property and

Equipment, net

 

 

Revenues

 

 

Property and

Equipment, net

 

United States

$

4,895

 

 

$

10,498

 

 

$

4,791

 

 

$

11,095

 

 

$

4,461

 

 

$

10,874

 

 

$

5,259

 

 

$

9,913

 

 

$

5,129

 

 

$

10,294

 

 

$

5,044

 

 

$

10,030

 

Australia

 

40

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

133

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

102

 

Brazil

 

30

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

82

 

Canada

 

97

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

82

 

Chile

 

34

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

44

 

Mexico

 

24

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

26

 

New Zealand

 

46

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

124

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

128

 

United Kingdom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

Total

$

5,166

 

 

$

10,995

 

 

$

5,059

 

 

$

11,588

 

 

$

4,714

 

 

$

11,383

 

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

10,145

 

 

$

5,350

 

 

$

10,583

 

 

$

5,321

 

 

$

10,494

 

128


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

16.

Guarantees and Contingencies

We have certain guarantees which consist of commitments made to third parties for leases or debt that are not recognized in our consolidated financial statements due to various dispositions, spin-offs and contractual arrangements, but that we have agreed to pay in the event of certain circumstances, including the default by an unrelated party. We also may have contingent environmental liabilities related to the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. We consider the likelihood of any material payments under these guarantees and contingencies to be remote. The guarantees and contingencies that are not recognized in our consolidated financial statements are listed below:

We remain contingently liable for rental payments on certain divested non-lodging properties. These primarily represent certain restaurants that were sold subject to our guarantee of the future rental payments. The aggregate amount of these future rental payments is approximately $17 million as of December 31, 2013.

We remain contingently liable for rental payments on certain divested non-lodging properties. These properties primarily represent certain restaurants that were sold subject to our guarantee of the future rental payments. The aggregate amount of these future rental payments is approximately $12 million as of December 31, 2016.

In connection with the sale of two hotels in January 2005, we remain contingently liable for the amounts due under the respective ground leases. The future minimum lease payments are approximately $8 million through the full term of the leases, including renewal options. We believe that the likelihood of any material payments related to these ground leases is remote, and in each case, we have been indemnified by the purchaser of the hotel.

In 1997, we owned Leisure Park Venture Limited Partnership, which owns and operates a senior living facility. We spun-off the partnership to Barceló as part of the REIT conversion, but we remain obligated under a guarantee of interest and principal with respect to $14.7 million of municipal bonds issued by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority through their maturity in 2027. However, to the extent we are required to make any payments under the guarantee, we have been indemnified by Barceló, who, in turn, is indemnified by the current owner of the facility.

In connection with the sale of two hotels in January 2005, we remain contingently liable for the amounts due under the respective ground leases. The future minimum lease payments are approximately $12 million through the full term of the leases, including renewal options. We believe that the likelihood of any material payments related to these ground leases is remote, and in each case, we have been indemnified by the purchaser of the hotel.

Guarantees andIn connection with the sale of the Atlanta Marriott Marquis in January 2013, we retained a contingent liability for potential environmental liabilities, that arewhich is not to exceed $5 million. This amount is recorded on our consolidated balance sheet include:

In connection with the sale of the Atlanta Marriott Marquis in January 2013, we retained $5 million of contingent liabilities related to potential environmental liabilities.

In connection with the sale of the Ritz-Carlton San Francisco hotel in June 2013, we agreed to guarantee the hotel’s operating income through December 31, 2016.  During this period, we will make support payments of up to $4 million a year, not to exceed $11 million for the life of the agreement.  As of December 31, 2013, we have accrued $11 million for the guarantee.

133


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSsheet.

 

17.

Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various legal proceedings in the normalordinary course of business regarding the operation of our hotels and company matters. To the extent not covered by insurance, these lawsuits generally fall into the following broad categories: disputes involving hotel-level contracts, employment litigation, compliance with laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, tax disputes and other general matters. Under our management agreements, our operators have broad latitude to resolve individual hotel-level claims for amounts generally less than $150,000. However, for matters exceeding such threshold, our operators may not settle claims without our consent.

Based on our analysis of legal proceedings with which we currently are currently involved or of which we are aware and our experience in resolving similar claims in the past, we have accrued approximately $18$5 million as of December 31, 2013.2016. We have estimated that, in the aggregate, our losses related to these proceedings could be as much as $50$17 million. We believe this range represents the maximum potential loss for all of our legal proceedings, with the exception of the San Antonio litigation discussed below.proceedings. We are not aware of any other matters with a reasonably possible unfavorable outcome for which disclosure of a loss contingency is required. No assurances can be given as to the outcome of any pending legal proceedings.

San Antonio Litigation. On April 27, 2005, we initiated a lawsuit against Keystone-Texas Property Holding Corporation (“Keystone”) seeking a declaration that a provision of the ground lease for the property under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter was valid and claiming that Keystone had breached that lease provision. On October 18, 2006, Keystone filed an amended counterclaim and later, a third party claim, alleging that we had tortiously interfered with Keystone’s attempted sale of the property and that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property.

On February 8, 2010, we received an adverse jury verdict in the 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas. The jury found that we tortiously interfered with the attempted sale by Keystone of the land under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter and awarded Keystone $34.3 million in damages, plus statutory interest. In addition, the jury found that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property and awarded Keystone $39 million in damages, plus statutory interest. Keystone only will be entitled to receive one of these damage awards. On February 12, 2010, the jury awarded Keystone $7.5 million in exemplary damages with respect to the second claim. The trial court, however, subsequently granted our motion to disregard the jury’s exemplary damages award. On June 3, 2010, the trial court issued its final judgment awarding Keystone: (i) $39 million in damages for slander of title; or (ii) alternatively, $34.3 million for tortious interference of contract; (iii) approximately $6.8 million in pre-judgment and post-judgment interest (as of December 31, 2013 interest was $17 million); (iv) approximately $3.5 million in attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs; and (v) an additional $750,000 in attorneys’ fees for any appeal to the court of appeals and Texas Supreme Court.

On November 23, 2011, a three-judge panel of the San Antonio Court of Appeals issued its memorandum opinion denying our appeal of the trial court’s June 3, 2010 final judgment. In addition, the panel overturned the trial court’s decision to grant our motion to disregard the jury’s $7.5 million award of exemplary damages. On January 17, 2012, we filed motions seeking rehearing from the three-judge panel and a motion for rehearing by the entire seven-judge court of appeals. Those motions were denied on February 29, 2012.

On May 16, 2012, we filed a Petition for Review in the Texas Supreme Court and on August 17, 2012 the Court requested briefing on the merits. Briefing concluded in January 2013. On June 28, 2013, the Court issued an order denying the petition for review; however, on December 13, 2013, the Court granted our motion for rehearing on that order and heard oral argument on our appeal on February 4, 2014. No assurances can be given as to the outcome of this appeal. We have accrued a loss contingency of approximately $68 million. We have funded a court-ordered $25 million escrow reserve for this legal proceeding.

 

18.

Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

Effective January 1, 2013, we report quarterly operating results on a calendar cycle, which now is consistent across all of our hotel managers and the majority of companies in the lodging industry. Historically, our annual financial statements have been reported on a calendar basis and are unaffected by this change. However, our quarterly operating results had been reported based on a 52-53 week fiscal calendar used by Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”), the manager of approximately 50% of our properties. For 2013, Marriott converted to reporting results based on a 12-month calendar year. During 2012, Marriott used a fiscal year ending on the Friday closest to December 31 and reported twelve weeks of operations for the first three quarters and sixteen weeks for the fourth quarter of the year for its Marriott-managed hotels. Accordingly, our first three quarters of operations in 2012 ended on March 23, June 15 and September 7. In contrast, managers of our other hotels, such as Ritz-Carlton, Hyatt, and Starwood, reported results on a monthly basis. During 2012, we did not report the month of operations that ended after our fiscal quarter until the following quarter for those hotels using a monthly reporting period because these hotel managers did not make mid-month results available to us. Accordingly, the month of operations that ended after our fiscal quarter was included in our quarterly results of operations in the

134


 

 

2016

 

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share/unit amounts)

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,339

 

 

$

1,459

 

 

$

1,295

 

 

$

1,337

 

Operating profit

 

 

151

 

 

 

239

 

 

 

144

 

 

 

150

 

Net income

 

 

184

 

 

 

351

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

128

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

182

 

 

 

347

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

126

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.47

 

 

 

.14

 

 

 

.17

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

 

.24

 

 

 

.47

 

 

 

.14

 

 

 

.17

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

184

 

 

 

352

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

127

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

 

.25

 

 

 

.48

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.17

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

 

.25

 

 

 

.48

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.17

 

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES129

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

following quarter for those calendar reporting hotel managers. As a result, our 2012 quarterly results of operations include results from hotel managers reporting results on a monthly basis as follows: first quarter (January, February), second quarter (March to May), third quarter (June to August) and fourth quarter (September to December).  

We did not restate the previously filed 2012 quarterly financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) because certain property-level operating expenses for our Marriott-managed properties necessary to restate operations are unavailable on a daily basis. Because we rely upon our operators for the hotel operating results used in our financial statements, the unavailability of this information on a calendar quarter basis for 2012 made restating our financial statements in accordance with GAAP unfeasible. Accordingly, the corresponding 2012 quarterly historical operating results are not comparable to our 2013 quarterly operating results.  

 

 

2013

 

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share/unit amounts)

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,225

 

 

$

1,399

 

 

$

1,211

 

 

$

1,331

 

Operating profit

 

 

90

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

138

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

34

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

59

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

26

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

67

 

Net income

 

 

60

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

126

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

56

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

123

 

Basic earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.07

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.09

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.03

 

 

 

.16

 

Diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.07

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.09

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.03

 

 

 

.16

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

57

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

125

 

Basic earnings per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.08

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.09

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.03

 

 

 

.17

 

Diluted earnings per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.15

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.08

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.04

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

.02

 

 

 

.09

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.16

 

 

 

.03

 

 

 

.17

 


135


HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share/unit amounts)

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

929

 

 

$

1,308

 

 

$

1,149

 

 

$

1,673

 

Operating profit

 

 

16

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

108

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

(54

)

 

 

79

 

 

 

(39

)

 

 

5

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

54

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

10

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

(36

)

 

 

15

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

(2

)

 

 

82

 

 

 

(34

)

 

 

15

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

(.08

)

 

 

.11

 

 

 

(.05

)

 

 

.01

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.01

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

 

 

 

 

 

.11

 

 

 

(.05

)

 

 

.02

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

(.08

)

 

 

.11

 

 

 

(.05

)

 

 

.01

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.01

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

 

 

 

 

 

.11

 

 

 

(.05

)

 

 

.02

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

(2

)

 

 

83

 

 

 

(35

)

 

 

16

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

(.08

)

 

 

.11

 

 

 

(.05

)

 

 

.01

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

.01

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common unit

 

 

 

 

 

.12

 

 

 

(.05

)

 

 

.02

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 

(.08

)

 

 

.11

 

 

 

(.05

)

 

 

.01

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

.08

 

 

 

.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

.01

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

 

 

 

 

 

.12

 

 

 

(.05

)

 

 

.02

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

 

(in millions, except per share/unit amounts)

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,302

 

 

$

1,439

 

 

$

1,283

 

 

$

1,326

 

Operating profit

 

 

133

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

133

 

 

 

143

 

Net income

 

 

99

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

165

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

98

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

163

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

 

.13

 

 

 

.28

 

 

 

.11

 

 

 

.22

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

 

.13

 

 

 

.28

 

 

 

.11

 

 

 

.22

 

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

99

 

 

 

215

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

165

 

Basic earnings per common unit

 

 

.13

 

 

 

.29

 

 

 

.12

 

 

 

.22

 

Diluted earnings per common unit

 

 

.13

 

 

 

.29

 

 

 

.12

 

 

 

.22

 

___________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Other income statement line items not presented for Host L.P. are equal to the amounts presented for Host Inc.

The sum of the basic and diluted earnings per common share and OP units for the four quarters in all years presented differs from the annual earnings per common share and OP units due to the required method of computing the weighted average number of shares and OP units in the respective periods.

 

 

 

136



Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item  9A.

Controls and Procedures

Controls and Procedures (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.)

Disclosure Controls and Procedure

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on thatthat evaluation, Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Host Inc. With the participation of Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132016 based on the Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.2016. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20132016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting of Host Inc., which appears in Item 8.

Controls and Procedures (Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance thatthat information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (2) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Host L.P. With the participation of Host Inc.’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness ofof our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132016 based on the Internal Control–Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.2016. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20132016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of Host L.P.’s independent registered public accounting firm from regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by Host L.P.’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to “non-accelerated filers.”

Item  9B.

Other Information

None.

 

137



PART III

Certain information called for by Items 10-14 is incorporated by reference from Host Inc.’s 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Notice and Proxy Statement (to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year).

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item with respect to directors is incorporated by reference to the section of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled “Proposal One: Election of Directors.” See Part I “Executive Officers” of this Annual Report for information regarding executive officers.

The information required by this item with respect to Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts is incorporated by reference to the section of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled “Corporate Governance and Board Matters.” There have been no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors since our lastlast annual report.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all employees. In compliance with the applicable rules of the SEC, special ethics obligations ofdirectors and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and other employees who perform financial or accounting functions are set forth in Section 10 of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, entitled “Special Ethics Obligations of Employees with Financial Reporting Obligations.”functions. The Code is available atat the Investor Information/Governance section of our website at www.hosthotels.com. A copy of the Code is available in print, free of charge, to stockholders and unitholders upon request to the company at the address set forth in Item 1 of this Annual Report under the section “Business—Where to Find Additional Information.” We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding an amendment to or waiver from a provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our web site.

 

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled: “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Officer Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” “Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Compensation Policy Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Report of the CompensationCompensation Policy Committee on Executive Compensation.”

 

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder and Unitholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled: “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Officer Compensation—Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.”

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled: “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Officer Compensation—Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.”

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled: “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Independence of Directors.”

 

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section of Host Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders entitled “Auditor Fees.”

 

 

 

138



PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)

LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

(i)FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

All financial statements of the registrants are set forth under Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K.

(ii)FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following financial information is filed herewith on the pages indicated.

Financial Schedules:

 

 

  

 

  

Page

 

III.

  

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation.

  

S-1 to S-6S-5

  

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(b) EXHIBITS

In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this report, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the company, its subsidiaries or other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:

should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;

should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;

have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and

may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and

were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.

139



 

Exhibit

No.

  

Description

 

 

 

3.

  

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

 

 

 

3.1

  

Articles of Restatement of Articles of IncorporationComposite Charter of  Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated July 18, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-4S-8 (SEC File No. 333-170934),333-212569) filed on December 2, 2010)July 18, 2016).

 

 

 

3.1A

  

Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 1, 2007).

 

 

 

3.2

  

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., effective November 6, 200821, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.33.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 12, 2008)22, 2016).

 

 

 

4.

  

Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders

 

 

 

4.1

  

See Exhibit 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions of the Articles and Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. defining the rights of security holders. See Exhibit 3.1A for provisions of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. defining the rights of security holders.

 

 

 

4.2

  

Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Host Marriott Corporation’s Amendment No. 4 to its Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-55807) filed on October 2, 1998).

 

 

 

4.3

  

Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of August 5, 1998, by and among HMH Properties, Inc., as Issuer, and the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 6, 1998) (SEC File No. 001-05664).

 

 

 

4.4

  

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 1998, by and among HMH Properties Inc., Host Marriott, L.P., the entities identified therein as New Subsidiary Guarantors and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of August 5, 1998, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein, Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Host Marriott, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 31, 1998) (SEC File No. 333-55807).

 

 

 

4.5

Thirty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated December 22, 2009, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly, The Bank of New York) as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 23, 2009).

 

 

 

4.6

Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 22, 2009, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., in their capacity as representatives of the several initial purchasers of the debentures, related to the 2.50% Exchangeable Senior Debentures due 2029 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2009).

4.7

Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 25, 2010, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 29, 2010).

4.8

Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 11, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 2011).

4.94.5

  

Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated November 18, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on November 18, 2011).

 

 

 

4.104.6

  

Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 22, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on March 23, 2012).

 

 

 

140


Exhibit
No.4.7

  

Description

4.11

Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated August 9, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on August 9, 2012).

 

 

 

4.124.8

  

Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 28, 2013, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on March 28, 2013).

 

 

 

10.4.9

  

Material ContractsIndenture, dated May 15, 2015, by and between Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 18, 2015).

 

 

 

10.1*4.10

First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 15, 2015, by and between Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Indenture dated May 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels &Resorts, L.P. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 18, 2015).

4.11

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated October 14, 2015, by and between Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Indenture dated May 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 14, 2015).

10.

Material Contracts


Exhibit
No.

Description

10.1

  

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 2014.2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 25, 2014).

 

 

 

10.2*10.2

  

Trust Agreement between Wilmington Trust Company and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., dated June 1, 2006, relating to the Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 25, 2014).  

 

 

 

10.3

  

Host Marriott Corporation and Host Marriott, L.P. 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, as amended and restated December 29, 1998, as amended January 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 2, 2004).

 

 

 

10.4*10.4

  

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Severance Plan for Executives, as amended and restated, effective as of December 16, 2013.31, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 22, 2016).

 

 

 

10.5

  

Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 22, 2012).

 

 

 

10.6

  

Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, effective as of March 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Commission on March 31, 2009).

 

 

 

10.7

  

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

 

 

 

10.810.8*

Form of Restricted Unit Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.

10.9

  

Form of Option Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

 

 

 

10.9

Amended and Restated Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Commission on February 25, 2008).

 

 

 

10.10#

 

FourthFifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of HHR EURO CV, dated as of June 27, 2011,6, 2014, by and among HHR Euro II GP B.V., HST GP EUROLP Euro B.V., HST Euro II LP B.V., APG Strategic Real Estate Pool N.V. and Jasmine Hotels Private Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q10.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on July 25, 2011)August 1, 2014).

 

 

 

10.1110.11*

  

First Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of HHR EURO CV, dated as of April 17, 2013, by and among HHR EURO II GP B.V., HST LP EURO B.V., HST Euro II LP B.V., APG Strategic Real Estate Pool N.V. and Jasmine Hotels Private Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on May 7, 2013).restated effective as of December 15, 2009, as further amended February 2, 2012, February 6, 2014 and February 4, 2016.

 

 

 

10.12

  

Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2011,September 10, 2015, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., certain Canadian subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch andSecurities Inc., The Bank of Nova Scotia, Bank of New York Mellon, Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as co-documentationdocumentation agents, and various other agents and lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 14, 2015).

12.

Statements re Computation of Ratios

12.1*

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

12.2*

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

21.

Subsidiaries

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

21.2*

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

23.

Consents

23*

Consent of KPMG LLP


Exhibit
No.

Description

31.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.3*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.4*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.

Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

32.2*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (vii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (viii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (ix) the Consolidated Statements of Capital for the Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (x) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; and (xi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged.

*

Filed herewith.

#

Confidential treatment requested.

This certificate is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Item 16.

Form 10‑K Summary

None.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

Date: February 24, 2017

By:

/s/ GREGORY J. LARSON

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ RICHARD E. MARRIOTT

Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 24, 2017

Richard E. Marriott

/s/ JAMES F. RISOLEO

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Director (Principal Executive Officer)

February 24, 2017

James F. Risoleo

/s/ GREGORY J. LARSON

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 24, 2017

Gregory J. Larson

/s/ BRIAN G. MACNAMARA

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 24, 2017

Brian G. Macnamara

/s/ MARY L. BAGLIVO

Director

February 24, 2017

Mary L. Baglivo

/s/ SHEILA C. BAIR

Director

February 24, 2017

Sheila C. Bair

/s/ TERENCE C. GOLDEN

Director

February 24, 2017

Terence C. Golden

/s/ ANN MCLAUGHLIN KOROLOGOS

Director

February 24, 2017

Ann McLaughlin Korologos

/s/ SANDEEP L. MATHRANI

Director

February 24, 2017

Sandeep L. Mathrani

/s/ JOHN B. MORSE, JR.

Director

February 24, 2017

John B. Morse, Jr.

/s/ WALTER C. RAKOWICH

Director

February 24, 2017

Walter C. Rakowich

/s/ GORDON H. SMITH

Director

February 24, 2017

Gordon H. Smith


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, LP

Date: February 24, 2017

By:

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., its general partner

By:

/s/ GREGORY J. LARSON

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following officers and directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the general partner of the registrant, and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ RICHARD E. MARRIOTT

Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 24, 2017

Richard E. Marriott

/s/ JAMES F. RISOLEO

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Director (Principal Executive Officer)

February 24, 2017

James F. Risoleo

/s/ GREGORY J. LARSON

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 24, 2017

Gregory J. Larson

/s/ BRIAN G. MACNAMARA

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 24, 2017

Brian G. Macnamara

/s/ MARY L. BAGLIVO

Director

February 24, 2017

Mary L. Baglivo

/s/ SHEILA C. BAIR

Director

February 24, 2017

Sheila C. Bair

/s/ TERENCE C. GOLDEN

Director

February 24, 2017

Terence C. Golden

/s/ ANN MCLAUGHLIN KOROLOGOS

Director

February 24, 2017

Ann McLaughlin Korologos

/s/ SANDEEP L. MATHRANI

Director

February 24, 2017

Sandeep L. Mathrani

/s/ JOHN B. MORSE, JR.

Director

February 24, 2017

John B. Morse, Jr.

/s/ WALTER C. RAKOWICH

Director

February 24, 2017

Walter C. Rakowich

/s/ GORDON H. SMITH

Director

February 24, 2017

Gordon H. Smith

138


SCHEDULE III

Page 1 of 5

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2016

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2016

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

Hotels:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atlanta Marriott Suites Midtown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Axiom Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

33

 

Boston Marriott Copley Place

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

282

 

 

 

282

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

 

40

 

Calgary Marriott Downtown

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Chicago Marriott Suites O'Hare

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Coronado Island Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Costa Mesa Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Courtyard Chicago Downtown/River North

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

1992

 

 

 

40

 

Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

Denver Marriott West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

1983

 

 

 

40

 

Embassy Suites Chicago-Downtown/Lakefront

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

1993

 

 

 

40

 

Grand Hyatt Atlanta in Buckhead

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Grand Hyatt Washington

 

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

276

 

 

 

430

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

33

 

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf

 

 

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

(50

)

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

31

 

Hilton Singer Island Oceanfront Resort

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

 

40

 

Houston Marriott Medical Center

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

34

 

Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Overlooking Boston

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

351

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Reston

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

242

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

230

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

271

 

 

 

311

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Hotel Rio de Janeiro

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

(21

)

 

 

7

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Houston

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Mexico City

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Washington D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

187

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

Key Bridge Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

S-1


SCHEDULE III

Page 2 of 5

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 2016

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2016

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

609

 

 

 

609

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

35

 

Marina del Rey Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

Marriott Marquis San Diego Marina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

376

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

578

 

 

 

578

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Miami Marriott Biscayne Bay

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Minneapolis Marriott City Center

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

New Orleans Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

133

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

229

 

 

 

245

 

 

 

148

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

New York Marriott Downtown

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

146

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

New York Marriott Marquis

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

552

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

776

 

 

 

825

 

 

 

576

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

 

40

 

Newport Beach Marriott Bayview

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

 

40

 

Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

 

40

 

Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

378

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

524

 

 

 

553

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Philadelphia Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

Residence Inn Arlington Pentagon City

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Rio de Janeiro Parque Olympico Hotels

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

(21

)

 

 

12

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

171

 

 

 

171

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

San Francisco Marriott Marquis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

398

 

 

 

398

 

 

 

265

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

San Ramon Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Santa Clara Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

Scottsdale Marriott Suites Old Town

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Boston Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

330

 

 

 

372

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Memphis Downtown Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

409

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

612

 

 

 

958

 

 

 

215

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Parsippany Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton San Diego Hotel & Marina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

328

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

366

 

 

 

366

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Swissôtel Chicago

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

215

 

 

 

244

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Tampa Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

1971

 

 

 

40

 

The Camby Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Fairmont Kea Lani, Maui

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

358

 

 

 

413

 

 

 

124

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

The Logan

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

S-2


SCHEDULE III

Page 3 of 5

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 2016

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2016

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

The Phoenician Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

334

 

 

 

406

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

32

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

196

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

283

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Golf Resort

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The St. Regis Houston

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Buckhead Atlanta

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Chicago River North

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Cincinnati

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Denver Downtown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Georgetown, Washington D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Indianapolis

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Kierland Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

280

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

305

 

 

 

405

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Los Angeles Airport

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Mission Hills Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

(39

)

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin New York Grand Central

 

 

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

232

 

 

 

388

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Seattle

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin South Coast Plaza, Costa Mesa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Waltham-Boston

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

W New York

 

 

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

312

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

W New York - Union Square

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

W Seattle

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

147

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Washington Dulles Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

1970

 

 

 

40

 

Washington Marriott at Metro Center

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

YVE Hotel Miami

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

33

 

Total hotels:

 

 

62

 

 

 

2,071

 

 

 

8,955

 

 

 

4,579

 

 

 

(92

)

 

 

2,043

 

 

 

13,470

 

 

 

15,513

 

 

 

5,941

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other properties, each less than 5% of total

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

various

 

 

 

40

 

TOTAL

 

$

62

 

 

$

2,075

 

 

$

8,956

 

 

$

4,591

 

 

$

(92

)

 

$

2,047

 

 

$

13,483

 

 

$

15,530

 

 

$

5,949

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S-3


SCHEDULE III

Page 4 of 6

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2016

(in millions)

Notes:

(A)

The change in total cost of properties for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

15,245

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

137

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

285

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(501

)

Impairments

 

 

(6

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

 

15,160

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

419

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

383

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(368

)

Assets held for sale

 

 

(78

)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

15,516

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

58

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

510

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(331

)

Assets held for sale

 

 

(223

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

15,530

 

(B)

The change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

4,962

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

540

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(219

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

 

5,283

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

558

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(148

)

Depreciation on assets held for sale

 

 

(27

)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

5,666

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

572

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(159

)

Depreciation on assets held for sale

 

 

(130

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

5,949

 

(C)

The aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $10,561 million at December 31, 2016.

(D)

The total cost of properties excludes construction-in-progress properties.


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

Description

3.

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1

Composite Charter of  Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated July 18, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-212569) filed on July 18, 2016).

3.1A

Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 1, 2007).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., effective November 21, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 22, 2016).

4.

Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders

4.1

See Exhibit 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions of the Articles and Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. defining the rights of security holders. See Exhibit 3.1A for provisions of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. defining the rights of security holders.

4.2

Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Host Marriott Corporation’s Amendment No. 4 to its Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-55807) filed on October 2, 1998).

4.3

Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of August 5, 1998, by and among HMH Properties, Inc., as Issuer, and the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 6, 1998) (SEC File No. 001-05664).

4.4

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 1998, by and among HMH Properties Inc., Host Marriott, L.P., the entities identified therein as New Subsidiary Guarantors and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of August 5, 1998, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein, Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Host Marriott, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 31, 1998) (SEC File No. 333-55807).

4.5

Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated November 18, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on November 29,18, 2011).

 

 

 

10.134.6

  

Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 22, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on March 23, 2012).

4.7

Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated August 9, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on August 9, 2012).

4.8

Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 28, 2013, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on March 28, 2013).

4.9

Indenture, dated May 15, 2015, by and between Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 18, 2015).


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

Description

4.10

First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 15, 2015, by and between Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Indenture dated May 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels &Resorts, L.P. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 18, 2015).

4.11

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated October 14, 2015, by and between Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Indenture dated May 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 14, 2015).

10.

Material Contracts

10.1

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 25, 2014).

10.2

Trust Agreement between Wilmington Trust Company and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., dated June 1, 2006, relating to the Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 25, 2014).  

10.3

Host Marriott Corporation and Host Marriott, L.P. 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, as amended and restated December 29, 1998, as amended January 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 2, 2004).

10.4

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Severance Plan for Executives, as amended and restated, effective as of December 31, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 22, 2016).

10.5

Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 22, 2012).

10.6

Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, effective as of March 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Commission on March 31, 2009).

10.7

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

10.8*

Form of Restricted Unit Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan.

10.9

Form of Option Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

10.10#

Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of HHR EURO CV, dated as of June 6, 2014, by and among HHR Euro II GP B.V., HST LP Euro B.V., HST Euro II LP B.V., APG Strategic Real Estate Pool N.V. and Jasmine Hotels Private Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 1, 2014).

10.11*

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as of December 15, 2009, as further amended February 2, 2012, February 6, 2014 and February 4, 2016.


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

Description

Amendment Agreement to10.12

Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2012,September 10, 2015, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., certain Canadian subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch andSecurities Inc., The Bank of Nova Scotia, Bank of New York Mellon, Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as co-documentationdocumentation agents, and various other agents and lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. filed on July 25, 2012).

141


Exhibit
No.

Description

10.14*

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as of December 15, 2009, as further amended February 2, 2012 and February 6, 2014.

10.15

Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated April 24, 2012, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, as sales agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 25, 2012).

10.16

Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated April 24, 2012, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., as sales agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2012).

10.17

Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 25, 2013, to the Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated as of April 24, 2012, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 25, 2013).

10.18

Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 25, 2013,  to the Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated as of April 24, 2012, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 25, 2013).

10.19

Employment Offer Letter between Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and Mr. Struan Robertson dated January 17, 2013. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. filed on February 25, 2013)September 14, 2015).

 

 

 

12.

  

Statements re Computation of Ratios

 

 

 

12.1*

  

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

 

12.2*

  

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

 

21.

  

Subsidiaries

 

 

 

21.1*

  

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

 

 

 

21.2*

  

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

 

 

 

23.

  

Consents

 

 

 

23*

  

Consent of KPMG LLP

 

 

 

31.

  

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

 

 

 

31.1*

  

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2*

  

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.3*

  

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.4*

  

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.

  

Section 1350 Certifications

 

 

 

32.1*

  

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

 

 

 

32.2*

  

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

 

142


101.INS

  

XBRL Instance Document.

  

Submitted electronically with this report.

 

 

 

 

 

101.SCH

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

  

Submitted electronically with this report.

 

 

 

 

 

101.CAL

  

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

  

Submitted electronically with this report.

 

 

 

 

 

101.DEF

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

  

Submitted electronically with this report.

 

 

 

 

 

101.LAB

  

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

  

Submitted electronically with this report.

 

 

 

 

 

101.PRE

  

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

  

Submitted electronically with this report.

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,


2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (vii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (viii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (ix) the Consolidated Statements of Capital for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (x) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; and (xi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged.

*

Filed herewith.

#

Confidential treatment requested.

This certificate is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

143


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

Date: February 26, 2014,

By:

/s/ GREGORY J. LARSON

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ RICHARD E. MARRIOTT

Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 26, 2014

Richard E. Marriott

/s/ W. EDWARD WALTER

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Director (Principal Executive Officer)

February 26, 2014

W. Edward Walter

/s/ GREGORY J. LARSON

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 26, 2014

Gregory J. Larson

/s/ BRIAN G. MACNAMARA

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 26, 2014

Brian G. Macnamara

/s/ MARY L. BAGLIVO

Director

February 26, 2014

Mary L. Baglivo

/s/ SHEILA C. BAIR

Director

February 26, 2014

Sheila C. Bair

/s/ ROBERT M. BAYLIS

Director

February 26, 2014

Robert M. Baylis

/s/ TERENCE C. GOLDEN

Director

February 26, 2014

Terence C. Golden

/s/ ANN MCLAUGHLIN KOROLOGOS

Director

February 26, 2014

Ann McLaughlin Korologos

/s/ JOHN B. MORSE, JR.

Director

February 26, 2014

John B. Morse, Jr.

/s/ WALTER C. RAKOWICH

Director

February 26, 2014

Walter C. Rakowich

/s/ GORDON H. SMITH

Director

February 26, 2014

Gordon H. Smith

144


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, LP

Date: February 26, 2014

By:

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., its general partner

By:

/s/ GREGORY J. LARSON

Gregory J. Larson

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following officers and directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the general partner of the registrant, and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ RICHARD E. MARRIOTT

Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 26, 2014

Richard E. Marriott

/s/ W. EDWARD WALTER

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Director (Principal Executive Officer)

February 26, 2014

W. Edward Walter

/s/ GREGORY J. LARSON

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 26, 2014

Gregory J. Larson

/s/ BRIAN G. MACNAMARA

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 26, 2014

Brian G. Macnamara

/s/ MARY L. BAGLIVO

Director

February 26, 2014

Mary L. Baglivo

/s/ SHEILA C. BAIR

Director

February 26, 2014

Sheila C. Bair

/s/ ROBERT M. BAYLIS

Director

February 26, 2014

Robert M. Baylis

/s/ TERENCE C. GOLDEN

Director

February 26, 2014

Terence C. Golden

/s/ ANN MCLAUGHLIN KOROLOGOS

Director

February 26, 2014

Ann McLaughlin Korologos

/s/ JOHN B. MORSE, JR.

Director

February 26, 2014

John B. Morse, Jr.

/s/ WALTER C. RAKOWICH

Director

February 26, 2014

Walter C. Rakowich

/s/ GORDON H. SMITH

Director

February 26, 2014

Gordon H. Smith

145


SCHEDULE III

Page 1 of 6

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2013

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2013

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

Hotels:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center

 

$

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

35

 

 

$

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

42

 

 

$

57

 

 

$

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

1976

 

 

 

40

 

Atlanta Marriott Suites Midtown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Boston Marriott Copley Place

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

267

 

 

 

267

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

 

 

 

2002

 

 

 

40

 

Calgary Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Chicago Marriott O'Hare

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

Chicago Marriott Suites O'Hare

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Coronado Island Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Costa Mesa Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Courtyard Chicago Downtown/ River North

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

1992

 

 

 

40

 

Courtyard Nashua

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

Dayton Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Delta Meadowvale Hotel & Conference Center

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

Denver Marriott West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

1983

 

 

 

40

 

Embassy Suites Chicago –Downtown/Lakefront

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

Four Seasons Hotel Philadelphia

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

1993

 

 

 

40

 

Grand Hyatt Atlanta in Buckhead

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Grand Hyatt Washington

 

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

259

 

 

 

413

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

33

 

Greensboro-Highpoint Marriott Airport

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

1983

 

 

 

40

 

Harbor Beach Marriott Resort & Spa

 

 

150

 

 

 

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

S-1


SCHEDULE III

Page 2 of 6

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 2013

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2013

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

Hilton Melbourne South Wharf

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

136

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

(30

)

 

 

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

31

 

Hilton Singer Island Oceanfront Resort

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

Houston Airport Marriott at George Bush Intercontinental

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

 

40

 

Houston Marriott at the Texas Medical Center

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Place Waikiki Beach

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

34

 

Hyatt Regency Cambridge, Overlooking Boston

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Maui Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

251

 

 

 

332

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Reston

 

 

100

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

188

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

230

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

1990

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

275

 

 

 

288

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Hotel Rio de Janeiro

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(12

)

 

 

9

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Houston

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Mexico City

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

JW Marriott Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

Kansas City Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

1993

 

 

 

40

 

Key Bridge Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

575

 

 

 

575

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

35

 

Manhattan Beach Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Marina del Rey Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

Marriott at Metro Center

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

Memphis Marriott Downtown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

S-2


SCHEDULE III

Page 3 of 6

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 2013

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2013

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

Miami Marriott Biscayne Bay

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Minneapolis Marriott City Center

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

New Orleans Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

New York Marriott Downtown

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

137

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

New York Marriott Marquis

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

552

 

 

 

178

 

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

730

 

 

 

779

 

 

 

492

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

Newark Liberty International Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

1984

 

 

 

40

 

Newport Beach Marriott Bayview

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

1975

 

 

 

40

 

Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa

 

 

100

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

 

 

 

1975

 

 

 

40

 

New Zealand Hotel Portfolio

 

 

87

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

11

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

147

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

35

 

Orlando World Center Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

356

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

502

 

 

 

531

 

 

 

204

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

Park Ridge Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

1987

 

 

 

40

 

Philadelphia Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

Philadelphia Marriott Downtown

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

144

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

246

 

 

 

257

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

Residence Inn Arlington Pentagon City

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

San Cristobal Tower, Santiago

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

San Diego Marriott Marquis & Marina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

202

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

480

 

 

 

480

 

 

 

198

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

San Diego Marriott Mission Valley

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

San Francisco Marriott Marquis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

388

 

 

 

388

 

 

 

219

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

S-3


SCHEDULE III

Page 4 of 6

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 2013

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2013

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

San Ramon Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

Santa Clara Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

1989

 

 

 

40

 

Scottsdale Marriott at McDowell Mountains

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

 

40

 

Scottsdale Marriott Suites Old Town

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

1988

 

 

 

40

 

Seattle Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Boston Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

312

 

 

 

354

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel at Keystone Crossing

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Needham Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

1986

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

409

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

592

 

 

 

938

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Parsippany Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton San Diego Hotel & Marina

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

328

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

359

 

 

 

359

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Sheraton Santiago Hotel & Convention Center

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

19

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Swissôtel Chicago

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

213

 

 

 

243

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

Tampa Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

 

40

 

Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & Marina

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

The Fairmont Kea Lani, Maui

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

328

 

 

 

383

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

 

 

 

2003

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Amelia Island

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

184

 

 

 

209

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Marina del Rey

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples

 

 

201

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

 

 

 

1996

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Naples Golf Resort

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

77

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Phoenix

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Ritz-Carlton, Tysons Corner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The St. Regis Houston

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

S-4


SCHEDULE III

Page 5 of 6

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (continued)

December 31, 2013

(in millions)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Subsequent

 

 

Foreign

 

 

Gross Amount at December 31, 2013

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

Costs

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings &

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Completion of

 

 

Date

 

 

Depreciation

 

Description

 

Debt

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

Adjustment

 

 

Land

 

 

Improvements

 

 

Total

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

Construction

 

 

Acquired

 

 

Life

 

The Westin Buckhead Atlanta

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

84

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

 

 

 

1998

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Chicago River North

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Cincinnati

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Denver Downtown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Georgetown, Washington, D.C.

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Indianapolis

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Kierland Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

280

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

301

 

 

 

401

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Los Angeles Airport

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Mission Hills Resort & Spa

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

(41

)

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin New York Grand Central

 

 

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

227

 

 

 

383

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Seattle

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

198

 

 

 

237

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin South Coast Plaza, Costa Mesa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

The Westin Waltham-Boston

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton Centre Hotel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

40

 

W New York

 

 

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

166

 

 

 

304

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

W New York – Union Square

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

40

 

W Seattle

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

 

 

40

 

Washington Dulles Airport Marriott

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

1970

 

 

 

40

 

Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

40

 

Total hotels:

 

 

709

 

 

 

1,966

 

 

 

9,359

 

 

 

4,076

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

1,952

 

 

 

13,417

 

 

 

15,369

 

 

 

5,037

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other properties, each less than 5% of total

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

21

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

various

 

 

 

40

 

TOTAL

 

$

709

 

 

$

1,987

 

 

$

9,363

 

 

$

4,093

 

 

$

(35

)

 

$

1,973

 

 

$

13,435

 

 

$

15,408

 

 

$

5,048

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S-5


SCHEDULE III

Page 6 of 6

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P., AND SUBSIDIARIES

REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2013

(in millions)

Notes:

(A)

The change in total cost of properties for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

$

13,749

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

1,155

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

338

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(214

)

Impairments

 

 

(8

)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

 

15,020

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

427

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

443

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(172

)

Impairments

 

 

(57

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

 

15,661

 

Additions:

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

184

 

Capital expenditures and transfers from construction-in-progress

 

 

353

 

Deductions:

 

 

 

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(789

)

Impairments

 

 

(1

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

15,408

 

(B)

The change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

$

3,834

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

496

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(24

)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

 

4,306

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

537

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(75

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

 

4,768

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

550

 

Dispositions and other

 

 

(270

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

5,048

 

(C)

The aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $10,745 million at December 31, 2013.

(D)

The total cost of properties excludes construction-in-progress properties.

S-6


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

Description

3.

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1

Articles of Restatement of Articles of Incorporation of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-170934), filed on December 2, 2010).

3.1A

Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 1, 2007).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., effective November 6, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 12, 2008).

4.

Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders

4.1

See Exhibit 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions of the Articles and Bylaws of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. defining the rights of security holders. See Exhibit 3.1A for provisions of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. defining the rights of security holders.

4.2

Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Host Marriott Corporation’s Amendment No. 4 to its Registration Statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-55807) filed on October 2, 1998).

4.3

Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of August 5, 1998, by and among HMH Properties, Inc., as Issuer, and the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 6, 1998) (SEC File No. 001-05664).

4.4

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 1998, by and among HMH Properties Inc., Host Marriott, L.P., the entities identified therein as New Subsidiary Guarantors and Marine Midland Bank, as Trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of August 5, 1998, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein, Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Host Marriott, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 31, 1998) (SEC File No. 333-55807).

4.5

Thirty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated December 22, 2009, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly, The Bank of New York) as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 23, 2009).

4.6

Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 22, 2009, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., in their capacity as representatives of the several initial purchasers of the debentures, related to the 2.50% Exchangeable Senior Debentures due 2029 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2009).

4.7

Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 25, 2010, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor to HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank), as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 29, 2010).

4.8

Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 11, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 2011).


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

Description

4.9

Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated November 18, 2011, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on November 18, 2011).

4.10

Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 22, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on March 23, 2012).

4.11

Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated August 9, 2012, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on August 9, 2012).

4.12

Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 28, 2013, by and among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, to the Amended and Restated Indenture dated August 5, 1998, including form of debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on March 28, 2013).

10.

Material Contracts

10.1*

Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 2014.

10.2*

Trust Agreement between Wilmington Trust Company and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., dated June 1, 2006, relating to the Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

10.3

Host Marriott Corporation and Host Marriott, L.P. 1997 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, as amended and restated December 29, 1998, as amended January 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Host Marriott Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 2, 2004).

10.4*

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Severance Plan for Executives, as amended and restated, effective as of December 16, 2013.

10.5

Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on February 22, 2012).

10.6

Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, effective as of March 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Commission on March 31, 2009).

10.7

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

10.8

Form of Option Agreement for use under the Host Hotels & Resorts 2009 Comprehensive Stock and Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed July 28, 2009).

10.9

Amended and Restated Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Commission on February 25, 2008).

10.10#

Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of HHR EURO CV, dated as of June 27, 2011, by and among HST GP EURO B.V., HST Euro II LP B.V., APG Strategic Real Estate Pool N.V. and Jasmine Hotels Private Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., filed on July 25, 2011).


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

Description

10.11

First Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of HHR EURO CV, dated as of April 17, 2013, by and among HHR EURO II GP B.V., HST LP EURO B.V., HST Euro II LP B.V., APG Strategic Real Estate Pool N.V. and Jasmine Hotels Private Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., and Host Hotels & Resorts L.P., filed on May 7, 2013).

10.12

Credit Agreement, dated as of November 22, 2011, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., certain Canadian subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and The Bank of Nova Scotia as co-documentation agents, and various other agents and lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., filed on November 29, 2011).

10.13

Amendment Agreement to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2012, among Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., certain Canadian subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and The Bank of Nova Scotia as co-documentation agents, and various other agents and lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the combined Current Report on Form 8-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. filed on July 25, 2012).

10.14*

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as of December 15, 2009, as further amended February 2, 2012 and February 6, 2014.

10.15

Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated April 24, 2012, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, as sales agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2012).

10.16

Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated April 24, 2012, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., as sales agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2012).

10.17

Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 25, 2013, to the Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated as of April 24, 2012, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 25, 2013).

10.18

Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 25, 2013,  to the Sales Agency Financing Agreement dated as of April 24, 2012, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 25, 2013).

10.19

Employment Offer Letter between Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. and Mr. Struan Robertson dated January 17, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. filed on February 25, 2013).

12.

Statements re Computation of Ratios

12.1*

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

12.2*

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

21.

Subsidiaries

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

21.2*

List of Subsidiaries of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.

23.

Consents

23*

Consent of KPMG LLP

31.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.

Description

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.3*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.4*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.

Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

32.2*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.†

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

Submitted electronically with this report.

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (vii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (viii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (ix) the Consolidated Statements of Capital for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; (x) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P.; and (xi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged.

 

 

*

Filed herewith.

#

Confidential treatment requested.

This certificate is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.