1
 
================================================================================- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                    U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
                            ------------------------
 
                                   FORM 10-K
 
[X]              ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D)15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
                   FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 19981999
 
                                       OR
 
[ ]               TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D)15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
                         FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
                          ____________________------------------------ TO
                            ____________________------------------------
 
                          COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-20243
 
                            ------------------------
 
                        VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 
                                                   
                MINNESOTA                                  41-1673770
       (State or Other Jurisdiction                     of                         (I.R.S. Employer
    of Incorporation or Organization)                  Identification No.)
 
  6740 SHADY OAK ROAD, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
              "WWW.VVTV.COM"                               55344-3433
 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                  (Zip Code)
612-947-5200 (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) ------------------------ Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X[X] No ____[ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained here-in,herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] As of April 20, 1998, 26,780,778March 26, 1999, 26,060,733 shares of the Registrant's common stock were outstanding. The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on such date, based upon the sale price of the common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market on April 20, 1998,March 26, 1999, was approximately $79,660,000.$362,679,000. For purposes of this computation, affiliates of the registrant are deemed only to be the registrant's executive officers and directors. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the Registrant's definitive ValueVision International, Inc. Proxy Statement forto be filed with the 1998 Annual MeetingSecurities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the close of Shareholdersthe Registrant's 1999 fiscal year, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ================================================================================- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 19981999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE ---- PART I Item 1. Business.................................................... 3 Item 2. Properties.................................................. 2827 Item 3. Legal Proceedings........................................... 2927 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 3028 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters......................................... 3129 Item 6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 3230 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................... 3331 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk........................................................ 45 Item 8. Financial Statements........................................ 4546 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.................................... 7380 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 7481 Item 11. Executive Compensation...................................... 7481 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.................................................. 7481 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 7481 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Lists and Reports on Form 8-K..................... 7582 SIGNATURES.............................................................. 8086
2 3 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS A. GENERAL ValueVision International, Inc. ("ValueVision" or the "Company") is an integrated direct marketing company which markets its products directly to consumers through electronic and print media. The Company is a Minnesota corporation with principal and executive offices at 6740 Shady Oak Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-3433. The Company was incorporated in the state of Minnesota on June 25, 1990 and its fiscal year ends on January 31. Fiscal years are designated by the calendar year in which the fiscal year ends (i.e., the Company's fiscal year ended January 31, 19981999 shall be referred to as "fiscal 1998"1999"). The Company's principal electronic media activity is its television home shopping networkbusiness which uses recognized on-air television home shopping personalities to market brand name merchandise and proprietary and private label consumer products at competitive or discount prices. The Company's live 24-hour per day television home shopping programming is distributed primarily through long-term cable affiliation agreements and the purchase of month-to-month full- and part-time block lease agreements of cable and broadcast television time. In addition, the Company distributes its programming through a Company owned or affiliated full power Ultra-High Frequency ("UHF") broadcast television stations,station, low power television ("LPTV") stations and to satellite dish owners. The Company also complements its television home shopping business by the sale of merchandise through its Internet shopping website (www.vvtv.com). The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ValueVision Direct Marketing Company, Inc. ("VVDM"), is a direct-mail marketer of a broad range of quality general merchandise which is sold to consumers through direct-mail catalogs and other direct marketing solicitations. Products offered include domestics, housewares, home accessories, electronics and various apparel wear. Through VVDM's wholly-owned subsidiary, Catalog Ventures, Inc. ("CVI"), the Company sells a variety of fashion jewelry, health and beauty aids, books, audio and video cassettes and other related consumer merchandise through the publication of five consumer specialty catalogs. The Company also manufactures and markets, via direct-mail, women's foundation undergarments and other women's apparel through VVDM's wholly-owned subsidiary Beautiful Images, Inc. ("BII"). Recent Developments National Media Merger.NBC and GE Capital Strategic Alliance. On January 5, 1998,March 8, 1999, the Company entered into a strategic alliance with the National Broadcasting Company, Inc. ("NBC") and G.E. Capital Equity Investments, Inc. ("GE Capital"). Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, NBC and GE Capital have agreed to jointly acquire an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), by and amongapproximate 19.9% beneficial ownership interest in the Company National Media Corporation(consisting of 5,339,500 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ("National Media") and Quantum Direct Corporation, formerly known as V-L Holdings Corp. ("Quantum Direct"Preferred Stock"), and a newly-formed Delaware corporation. Ifwarrant to acquire 1,450,000 shares of Common Stock (the "Distribution Warrant") under a "Distribution and Marketing Agreement") for aggregate consideration of approximately $56.0 million (or approximately $8.29 per share), representing approximately $44.0 million for the mergers (the "Mergers") contemplated byPreferred Stock and approximately $12.0 million upon exercise of the Merger Agreements were to be consummated,Distribution Warrant. In addition, the Company will issue NBC and National Media would have become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Quantum Direct, with each outstanding shareGE Capital a warrant to increase their potential aggregate equity stake to 39.9% (the "Investment Warrant"), subject to approval of the Company's common stock being converted into 1.19 shares of common stock of Quantum Direct and each outstanding share of common stock of National Media being converted into one share of common stock of Quantum Direct. Consummation ofshareholders. NBC will also have the Mergers is subjectexclusive right to the satisfaction of a number of conditions, including, but not limited to, holders of no more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stocknegotiate on behalf of the Company makingfor the demands and giving the notices required under Minnesota law to assert dissenters' appraisal rights. On April 8, 1998, it was announced thatdistribution of its television home shopping service. The Federal Trade Commission notified the Company received preliminary notification from holders of more than 5% of ValueVision's common stockon April 5, 1999 that they intended to exercise their dissenter's rightsit had granted the Company early termination with respect to the proposed Mergers. The Company also reported that it had advised National Media that it does not intend to waive30 day waiting period under the Merger Agreement condition to closing requiring that holdersHart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of not more than 5% of the shares of the Company's common stock have demanded their dissenter's rights. The Company and National Media had special meetings of their shareholders scheduled on April 14, 1998 to vote on the proposed Mergers.1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"). In light of this development, the receiptCompany expects that the closing of the dissenters' notice, the companies mutually agreed to postpone their respective shareholder meetings while the companies attempted to negotiate a restructuringsale of the Mergers that is acceptable3,739,500 shares of Preferred Stock not subject to eachshareholder approval, the Investment Warrant and the Distribution Warrant will take place during the week of April 12, 1999. Closing on the sale of the companiesremaining shares of Preferred Stock and in the best interest of their shareholders. Asexercisability of the date hereof, the CompanyInvestment Warrant is subject to Shareholder Approval. See "Strategic Relationships -- NBC and National Media are still attempting to negotiateGE Capital Strategic Alliance" for a restructuringdetailed discussion of the Mergersthis alliance. 3 4 and have not yet rescheduled their respective special meetings. There can be no assurances that the companies will successfully be able to negotiate such a restructuring, or if negotiated, that such Mergers will be consummated. See "Item 1. Business -- G. National Media Corporation -- 1998 Merger Proposal." Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gene McCaffery and Quantum Direct have entered into a three year employment agreement pursuant to which Mr. McCaffery will serve as Quantum Direct's Chief Executive Officer with a base salary of $500,000 during the first year, $525,000 during the second year, and $550,000 during the third year. The agreement also provides for bonus salary of up to 100% of the base salary, which may be earned only upon Quantum Direct meeting certain operating income, revenue and stock performance criteria. In addition, pursuant to the agreement, Mr. McCaffery is being issued stock options to acquire 800,000 shares of Quantum Direct's common stock, $.01 par value, with an exercise price equal to $3.375 per share, the last trading price of the Company's common stock on March 30, 1998. The exercise price of such options will be adjusted to the last trading price of Quantum Direct's common stock on the first day it trades, to the extent such price is lower than $3.375. In the event the Mergers are not consummated, the Company and Mr. McCaffery have agreed to enter into an employment agreement on substantially the same terms pursuant to which Mr. McCaffery would become the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. See "Item 1. Business -- G. National Media Corporation -- 1998 Merger Proposal." Annual Meeting. The Company has scheduled its 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for June 2, 1998. The Company did not hold an 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Accordingly, the 1998 Annual Meeting will address the Company's performance for both the 1997 and 1998 fiscal years. Electronic Media The Company's principal electronic media activity is its live 24-hour per day television home shopping network program. The Company's home shopping network is the third largest television home shopping retailer in the United States. Through its continuous merchandise-focused television programming, the Company sells a wide variety of products and services directly to consumers. Sales from the Company's television home shopping networkbusiness totaled $148,198,000 and $106,571,000 representing 73% and $99,419,000, representing 49% and 62% of net sales, for fiscal 19981999 and 1997,1998, respectively. Products are presented by on-air television home shopping personalities and orders are placed directly with the Company by viewers who call a toll-free telephone number. Orders are processed on-sitetaken by the Company's call center representatives who use the Company's customized computer processing system which provides real-time feedback to the on-air hosts. The Company's television programming is produced at the Company's Eden Prairie, Minnesota facility and is transmitted nationally via satellite to local cable system operators, broadcast television stations and satellite dish owners. Products and Product Mix. Products sold on the Company's television home shopping network include jewelry, giftware, collectibles, and related merchandise, apparel, electronics, housewares, seasonal items and other merchandise. As part of the ongoinga shift in merchandise mix, the Company continueddevoted additional air time to devote increasing airtime to non-jewelryits higher margin jewelry merchandise during fiscal 1999 over fiscal 1998. Jewelry accounted for 61%72% of the programming air time during fiscal 19981999 compared with 67%61% for fiscal 1997.1998. Jewelry isrepresents the network's largest single category of merchandise, representing 74% of television home shopping net sales in fiscal 1999, 60% of net sales in fiscal 1998 and 62% of net sales in fiscal 1997 and 73% of net sales in fiscal 1996.1997. The Company has developed this product group to include proprietary lines such as New York Collection(TM), Ultimate Ice(TM), Vincenza Collections(TM)Gems at Large(TM), Brillante(R)Treasures D'Italia(TM), C-Band, DaywearBrillante(TM), Trader Jack(TM), C-Band(TM), Daywear(TM) and Illusions(TM) products produced to ValueVision's specifications or designed exclusively for sale by the Company. Program Distribution. Since the inception of the Company's television operations, ValueVision has experienced continued growth in the number of full-time equivalent cable homes ("FTEs")FTE"s) which receive the Company's programming. As of January 31, 1998,1999, the Company served a total of 21.8 million cable homes, or 14.9 million FTE's, compared with a total of 17.4 million cable homes, or 11.7 million FTEs, compared with a total of 16.4 million cable homes or 11.4 million FTEsFTE's as of January 31, 1997 and compared with 223,000 cable homes or 76,000 FTEs at January 31, 1992, the end of the Company's first fiscal year.1998. Approximately 10.6 million, 8.6 million 7.7 million and 7.27.7 million cable homes at January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, respectively, received the Company's television home shopping programming on a full-time basis. As of January 31, 1998,1999, the Company's television home shopping programming was carried by twoone full power 4 5 broadcast television stationsstation owned by the Company, 208230 cable systems (188(208 in fiscal 1997)1998) on a full-time basis and 75106 cable systems (77(75 in fiscal 1997)1998) on a part-time basis. Homes that receive the Company's television home shopping programming 24 hours per day are counted as one FTE each and homes that receive the Company's programming for any period less than 24 hours are counted based upon an analysis of time of day and day of week. The total number of cable homes that receive the Company's television home shopping programming represents approximately 27%29% of the total number of cable subscribers in the United States. Satellite Service. The Company's programming is distributed to cable systems, full and low power television stations and satellite dish owners via a leased communications satellite transponder. Satellite service may be interrupted due to a variety of circumstances beyond the Company's control, such as satellite transponder failure, satellite fuel depletion, governmental action, preemption by the satellite lessor and service failure. The Company does not have any agreements fromhas an agreement for preemptable immediate backupback-up satellite services, although itservice and believes it could arrange for such services from others.back-up service if satellite transmission is interrupted. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to make anymaintain such arrangements and the Company may incur substantial additional costs in enteringto enter into new arrangements. Print Media The Company is also a direct-mail marketer of a broad range of quality general merchandise which is sold to consumers through direct-mail catalogs and other direct marketing solicitations. The Company's involvement in the print media, direct marketing business is the result of a series of acquisitions made in fiscal 1997 by VVDM. Sales from the Company's print media, direct marketing business totaled $55,530,000 and $111,411,000, representing 27% and $60,059,000, representing 51% and 38% of net sales for fiscal 1999 and 1998, respectively. The decrease in 4 5 net sales is directly attributable to the decline in catalog sales resulting from the downsizing and 1997, respectively.eventual divestiture of the Company's unprofitable HomeVisions catalog operations. Effective July 27, 1996, VVDM acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain obligations of Montgomery Ward Direct L.P., a four year old catalog business operated under the Montgomery Ward Direct name ("MWD"). In fiscal 1998, the Company changed the name of the MWD catalog to HomeVisions. Through fiscal 1999, HomeVisions' principal direct marketing vehicle iswas its home decor and furnishings catalog, a full-color booklet of approximately 50 to 100 pages that is mailed semi-monthly to its customer list and to individuals whose names are generated from mailing lists rented by HomeVisions. HomeVisions also produces and mails special issues during the holiday season and produces inventory clearance catalogs. Historically, a significant portion of HomeVisions' catalogs have been targeted mainly to Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated ("Montgomery Ward") credit card account holders.catalog. Effective March 31, 1998, overall circulation of the HomeVisions catalog is expected to bewas reduced pursuant to thea November 1997 restructuring of an operating and license agreement the Company had with Montgomery Ward, Operating and License Agreement in November 1997, whereby, among other things, the Company agreed to cease the use of the Montgomery Ward and Montgomery Ward Direct names in its catalog operations in exchange for Montgomery Ward's return of 3.8 million common stock purchase warrants. See "Strategic AlliancesRelationships -- Montgomery Ward Alliance". In the third quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company approved a restructuring plan and effectively divested its unprofitable HomeVisions catalog operations. The decision to restructure and divest HomeVisions was made primarily as a result of the continuing operating losses and deteriorating financial performance over the past year of HomeVisions' operations since Montgomery Ward's announcement of its bankruptcy filing in the summer of 1997. On October 22, 1996, VVDM acquired all of the outstanding shares of BII, a manufacturer and direct marketer of women's foundation undergarments and other women's apparel. DirectBII's direct marketing solicitation is through space advertisements of BII'sits merchandise in national and regional newspapers and magazines. Effective November 1, 1996, VVDM acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain obligations of Catalog Ventures, Inc. and Mitchell & Webb, Inc. (collectively "CVI"), two direct marketing companies which together publish five consumer specialty catalogs. CVI currently produces five special interest catalogs which are mailed approximately monthly and include Nature's Jewelry(R), The Pyramid Collection(TM), Serengeti(R), NorthStyle(R) and The Mind's Eye(R)Catalog Ventures' Favorites(R). The full-color catalogs generally contain approximately 50 to 60 pages and are mailed to CVI's customer list and to individuals whose names are generated from mailing lists rented by CVI. Products and Product Mix. Products offered under the HomeVisions catalog include domestics, housewares, home accessories and electronics. Products offered through CVI include a variety of fashion jewelry, health and beauty aids, books, audio and video cassettes and other related consumer merchandise. BII manufactures and markets, via direct mail, women's foundation undergarments and other women's apparel designed to provide comfort, support and posture enhancement. 5 6 Circulation. HomeVisions'CVI mails each of its five specialty catalogs areon a seasonal basis and primarily targeted to educated middle incometargets well-educated, middle- and upper-income women aged 35 to 50.55. Approximately 4232 million HomeVisionsCVI catalogs were mailed in fiscal 1998.1999 (35 million during fiscal 1998). At January 31, 1998, HomeVisions1999, CVI had approximately 548,000585,000 "active" catalog customers (defined as individuals that have purchased from the Company within the preceding 12 months) and combined customer and prospect files that totaled approximately 3.4 million names. CVI mails each of its five specialty catalogs on a seasonal basis and primarily targets well-educated, middle and upper-income women aged 35 to 55. Approximately 35 million CVI catalogs were mailed in fiscal 1998. At January 31, 1998, CVI had approximately 553,000 active catalog customers and approximately 4.84.1 million customer names in its catalog customer list database. During fiscal 1998,1999, BII had approximately 678719 million printed space advertisements or "impressions" circulated in national and regional newspapers and magazines.magazines (678 million during fiscal 1998). At January 31, 1998,1999, BII had approximately 210,000265,000 active customers and approximately 650,000733,000 customer names in its customer list database. B. BUSINESS STRATEGY The Company's primary business strategy is to increase salesleverage its core television home shopping business and cash flows from existing direct marketing operationsposition the Company to become a principal player in the evolving convergence and development of electronic commerce. As part of the Company's recently announced strategic alliance with NBC and GE Capital, the NBC cable distribution team will assist the Company in increasing its household distribution, a key Company initiative. This alliance also positions the Company for the future as transactional abilities become increasingly important in the world of electronic convergence. As the television and personal computer converge, access to electronic revenue streams, like home shopping through cable and the acquisition of additional direct-mail companies to complement its growing direct marketing business.Internet, become extremely valuable. In addition, the Company's strategy involves increasing sales and cash flows by increasing the number of FTEsFTE's that receive the Company's television home shopping programming through (i) affiliation agreements with 5 6 cable companies, (ii) block lease agreements and (iii) the use of broadcast television stations and "must carry" rights.stations. The Company also anticipates growth through (i) increased penetration of new customers from existing homes served by television programming and through the Company's recent investment and future expected growth in direct-to-consumer selling on theits Internet shopping website at (www.vvtv.com), (ii) continued expansion of repeat sales to existing customers and (iii) increased circulation of catalog mailings and (iv) the acquisition of additional direct-mail marketing companies.mailings. Cable Affiliation Agreements As of January 31, 1998,1999, the Company had entered into long-term cable affiliation agreements with thirteentwelve multiple system operators ("MSOs"), which require each MSO to offer the Company's cable television home shopping programming substantially on a full-time basis to their cable systems. The aggregate number of cable homes served by these thirteentwelve MSOs is approximately 20.524.3 million, of which approximately 7.99.4 million cable homes (7.6(8.9 million FTEs)FTE'S) currently receive the Company's programming. The stated terms of the affiliation agreements range from twothree to seven years. Under certain circumstances, the MSOs may cancel the agreements prior to their expiration. There can be no assurance that such agreements will not be so terminated or that such termination will not materially or adversely affect the Company's business. In addition, these MSOs are also carrying the Company's programming on an additional 690,0002,285,000 cable homes (265,000 FTEs)(1,059,000 FTE'S) pursuant to short-term cable carriage arrangements. The affiliation agreements provide that the Company will pay each MSO a monthly cable access fee and marketing support payments based upon the number of homes carrying the Company's television home shopping programming. Certain of the affiliation agreements also require payment of one-time initial launch fees which are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreements. The Company has entered into, and currently plans to enter into, affiliation agreements with other cable television operators providing for full- orfull-or part-time carriage of the Company's television home shopping programming. Block Lease Agreements The Company currently leases blocks of cable television time from certain cable operators, typically for one year periods, with thirty-day cancellation privileges by either party. General. Commencing in January 1992, the Company began leasing blocks of cable television time for its programming. On average, the Company's lease agreements provide for approximately 120 to 140 hours or more of programming weekly and are generally terminable by either party on thirty days' notice. This method of programming distribution, as a component of the Company's overall distribution strategy, may be significantly expanded in the event of favorable action or a judicial review of the "leased access" rules pursuant 6 7 to the Cable Act. However, no assurance can be made with respect to the outcome of these proceedings. See "Federal Regulation." "LeasedLeased Access." Cable systems are generally required to make up to 15% of their channel capacity available for lease by nonaffiliated programmers. See "Federal Regulation." In May 1993,1997, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") issued rules generally limiting cable leased access rates that cable systems can charge nonaffiliated programmers such as the Company. These rules, which used a "highest implicit fee" proxy for the costs cable operators incurred in carrying leased access programming, often allowed operatorsCompany to increase lease rates dramatically and affected the Company's ability to gain carriage on some systems. The FCC adopted revised rules in February 1997. These revised rules include a modified version of the proxy called the "average implicit fee," which changesfee" received by the calculation of the proxy incable operator for a way that makes it unclear whether or to what extent lease rates will be affected in any particular case. However, the Company's preliminary impression has been that the new rates remain largely unaffordable. The Company has petitioned the D.C. Circuit for review of these newly revised rate provisions. Both the petition for review and a similar petition are currently pending. There can be no assurances that the Company will prevail in this litigation or, if it succeeds, that the rules the FCC would adopt in place of the challenged ones will be favorable to the Company. The timing of any FCC or court action is uncertain.channel. Broadcast Television Stations The Company currently owns one full power broadcast television station that carries the ValueVision television home shopping program primarily on a full-time basis, KVVV (TV), licensed to Baytown, Texas and serving the Houston, Texas area. The Company's current strategy is to buy or sell broadcast television stations at appropriate prices when investment opportunities arise. When purchasing broadcast television stations, the Company does not consider conventional measures of a station's performance, such as over the air coverage, advertising revenues, audience share, programming or demographics, to select stations for acquisition. Rather, the Company focuses on the Area of Dominant Influence ("ADI") of the market in which the station is located and the number of cable households within each ADI. The Company generally intends to broadcast primarily home shopping programming over full power television stations that it acquires, and does not expect its programming to generate significant advertising revenues. Accordingly, the preacquisition operating results of any full power television station will not be predictive of the operating results following acquisition by the Company. Summary of Acquisitions and Dispositions. In March 1996, the Company completed the acquisition of the full power Ultra-High Frequency ("UHF") independent television station KBGE (TV), Channel 33, serving the Seattle-Tacoma, Washington market ("KBGE") for approximately $4.6 million. During fiscal 1995, the Company acquired four full power UHF television stations (WVVI -- Washington, D.C. ADI; KVVV -- Houston, Texas ADI; WHAI -- New York City ADI; and WAKC -- Cleveland-Akron, Ohio ADI) for an aggregate purchase price, including acquisition related costs, of approximately $22.4 million. In February 1998, the Company completed the sale of its television station KBGE, which serves the Seattle-Tacoma, Washington market. In July 1997, the Company completed the sale of its television station WVVI (TV), licensed to Manassas, Virginia. In February 1996, the Company sold two stations serving the New York City (WHAI) and Cleveland-Akron, Ohio (WAKC) markets. Television station KVVV (TV) is 6 7 currently carrying the Company's television home shopping programming and is located in the Houston, Texas market which has a total of approximately 1.6 million homes, including approximately 894,000918,000 cable homes within its combined ADI. Approximately 287,000561,000 of these cable homes currently receive ValueVision's programming. The Company purchased KBGE, licensed to Bellevue, Washington and serving Seattle-Tacoma, Washington from NWTV, Inc. for aggregate consideration of $4,600,000 on March 15, 1996. KBGE commenced broadcast operations during October 1995. TheAt the time of purchase, the Seattle-Tacoma, Washington market representsrepresented the 13th largest ADI in the nation and ranksranked ninth among U.S. cable markets, with approximately 1.0 million cable television households and an average cable penetration of almost 70%. On February 27, 1998, the Company completed the sale of KBGE (TV), Channel 33, along with two of the Company's non-cable, low-power stations in Portland, Oregon and Indianapolis, Indiana and a minority interest in which an entity had 7 8 applied for a new full-power station to Paxson Communications Corporation ("Paxson") for a total of approximately $35 million in cash. Under the terms of the agreement, Paxson paid the Company approximately $25 million upon closing and the remaining $10 million is to be paid when KBGE, which is currently operating at reduced power from downtown Seattle, is able to relocate its antenna and increase its transmitter power to a level at or near its licensed full power.payable by the first quarter of fiscal 2000. The Company will retain and continue to serve the Seattle market via its recently-launched low-power station K58DP (TV), which transmits from downtown Seattle. Management believes that the sale will not have a significant impact on the ongoing operations of the Company. The pre-tax gain to be recorded on the first cash installment with respect to the sale of this television station is expected to bewas approximately $19.8 million and will bewas recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. The Company purchased WVVI (TV), licensed to Manassas, Virginia, from National Capital Christian Broadcasting, Inc. ("National") for $4,850,000, of which $4,050,000 was paid at the initial closing on March 28, 1994 and $800,000 was paid at a second closing on April 11, 1996. The Company also purchased at the WVVI initial closing a five-year secured convertible debenture in the principal amount of $450,000. The debenture was convertible at the Company's option into that number of shares of common stock which represented approximately 19% of the outstanding capital stock of Capital Television Network, Inc. ("Capital"). In April 1996, the Company received certain studio and production equipment from National and Capital in lieu of a cash repayment of the amount outstanding under the secured convertible debenture. On July 31, 1997, the Company completed the sale of WVVI (TV), which serves the Washington, D.C. market, to Paxson for approximately $30 million in cash and the receipt of 1,197,892 shares of Paxson common stock valued at $11.92 per share as determined pursuant to an independent financial appraisal. Under the terms of the agreement, Paxson paid the Company $20 million in cash upon closing and was required to pay an additional $10 million to the Company as a result of the United States Supreme Court upholding the "must carry" provision of the 1992 Cable Act. WVVI (TV) carried the Company's television home shopping programming to approximately 874,000 cable television households. The pre-tax gain recorded on the sale of this television station was approximately $38.9 million and was recognized in the second fiscal quarter ended July 31, 1997. The Company acquired WHAI (TV), a full power UHF television station licensed to Bridgeport, Connecticut and servicing part of the New York City ADI in December 1994 from Bridgeways Communications Corp. Total consideration for the acquisition of WHAI was $7,320,000, including $3,900,000 in cash and 720,000 shares of the Company's common stock with a fair market value of $3,420,000. In April 1994, the Company acquired WAKC, a full power UHF station licensed to Akron, Ohio, for approximately $6,000,000, including $1,000,000 payable under the terms of a non-compete agreement in five equal annual installments commencing in April 1995. Since its acquisition, WAKC had been operated as an ABC network affiliate and did not carry any of the Company's television home shopping programming. On February 28, 1996, the Company completed the sale of these two television stations to Paxson for $40.0 million in cash plus the assumption of certain obligations. The pre-tax gain on the sale of these two television stations of approximately $27 million was recognized in the first fiscal quarter ended April 30, 1996. The Company purchased KVVV, licensed to Baytown, Texas, from Pray, Inc. for a purchase price of $5,750,000, of which $4,150,000 was paid at the initial closing on March 28, 1994. On March 31, 1997, the Supreme Court upheld the "must carry" provisions of the 1992 Cable Act, and as a result, the Company paid the remaining $1,600,000 upon a second closing. "Must7 8 Must Carry." The Company has achieved increased cable distribution of its programming under the FCC's "must carry"must carry rules through mandatory carriage on local cable systems of full power television stations it has acquired or intends to acquire. In general, and subject to the right of a cable operator to seek FCC relief upon a showing of lack of service or coverage or by other factors, the current "must carry"must carry rules entitle full power television stations to mandatory cable coverage, at no charge, in all cable homes located within each station's ADI or Designated Market Area ("DMA"), provided that the signal is of adequate strength and the cable system has "must carry"must carry designated channels available. See "Federal Regulation." Mandatory cable carriage can substantially increase, at a low cost, the number of homes that a full power television station can 8 9 reach. On March 31, 1997, the Supreme Court, rejecting a constitutional challenge brought by cable industry plaintiffs, upheld in their entirety the "must carry" rules applicable to full power television stations. Other Methods of Program Distribution The Company's programming is also broadcast full-time to "C"-band satellite dish owners and homes via thirteentwelve low power television ("LPTV") stations that a subsidiary of the Company owns or with which it has programming lease agreements.owns. The LPTV stations and satellite dish transmissions were collectively responsible for less than 8%10% of the Company's sales in its last fiscal year. LPTV stations reach a substantially smaller radius of television households than full power television stations, are generally not entitled to "must carry"must carry rights and are subject to substantial FCC limitations on their operations. However, LPTV stations can be constructed and operated atAdditionally, the Company's programming is broadcast on a substantially lower cost than full power television stations. During fiscal 1998,part-time basis to subscribers of the Company acquired five LPTV stations located in Charlotte, North Carolina, Kansas City, Missouri (two LPTV stations), Cleveland, Ohio, and Houston, Texas. In February 1998, the Company also sold two LPTV stations located in Portland, Oregon and Indianapolis, Indiana. The Company now owns and operates ten LPTV stations. The Company is preparing to close on the acquisition of an additional LPTV station in Seattle, Washington with which the Company has a programming lease agreement. One other LPTV station, located in Richmond, Virginia, with which the Company currently has a programming agreement, is scheduled to be acquired in fiscal 1999.medium-powered satellite service called Primestar. Internet Website In April 1997, the Company launched an interactive shopping site address on the Internet website located at WWW.VVTV.COM.www.vvtv.com. The Internet site provides consumers with access to the general merchandise offered on the Company's television home shopping program as well as provide consumers the opportunity to view and hear the live 24-hour per day television home shopping program and an opportunity to purchase general merchandise offered on the Company's television home shopping program. Although still a small portion of total sales, Internet sales for the year ended January 31, 1999 increased at a far greater percentage than television home shopping sales over the year ended January 31, 1998. This method of program distribution is in the development stagecurrently being more fully developed and, consequently, the Company cannot predict the impact it will have on future operating results. In addition, the Company, through CVI, also uses a different interlinked website for each of its five specialty catalogs. Each site features a full selection of the merchandise currently offered in these catalogs as well as discounts on closeout merchandise. At this time, the Company is subject to liquidatea number of general business regulations and laws or regulations regarding taxation and online commerce. However, due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet and other online services, it is possible that additional laws and regulations may be adopted with respect to the Internet or other online services, covering such issues as user privacy, advertising, pricing, content, copyrights and trademarks, distribution, taxation, and characteristics and quality of products and services. Changes in consumer protection laws also may impose additional burdens on those companies conducting business online. The adoption of any additional laws or regulations may decrease the growth of the Internet or other online services, which could, in turn, decrease the demand for the Company's products and services and increase its overstock merchandise.cost of doing business through the Internet. Moreover, it is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, libel and personal privacy would apply to the Internet and online commerce. In addition, as the Company's web site is available over the Internet in all states, and as it sells to numerous consumers residing in such states, such jurisdictions may claim that the Company is required to qualify to do business as a foreign corporation in each such state, a requirement that could result in taxes and penalties for the failure to qualify. Any such new legislation or regulation, the application of laws and regulations from jurisdictions whose laws do not currently apply to the Company's business or the application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet and other online services could have an adverse effect on the growth of the Company's business in this area. Print Media Operations The Company's print media operations provide customers with a broad range of quality merchandise at competitive or discounted prices through the convenience of catalog and other direct marketing solicitations. 8 9 The Company's objective for print media activities is to expand recently acquired direct marketing operations while possibly acquiring additional direct-mail marketing companies.companies should they fit within the Company's overall business strategy. The Company's strategy for print media operations is to (i) perform effective target marketing and increase catalog circulation to achieve strong sales growth, (ii) procure products more efficiently and improve pricing to increase gross margins, (iii) improve order processing and distribution efficiencies through consolidation of operations, and (iv) share customer lists between operating units. C. STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS NBC and GE Capital Strategic Alliance On March 8, 1999, the Company entered into a strategic alliance with NBC and GE Capital. Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, NBC and GE Capital have agreed to jointly acquire an approximate 19.9% ownership interest in the Company (consisting of 5,339,500 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, and a warrant to acquire 1,450,000 shares of Common Stock (the "Distribution Warrant") under a "Distribution and Marketing Agreement" discussed below) for aggregate consideration of approximately $56.0 million (or approximately $8.29 per share). In addition, the Company will issue NBC and GE Capital a warrant to increase their potential aggregate equity stake to 39.9%, subject to approval of the Company's shareholders ("Shareholder Approval"). NBC will also have the exclusive right to negotiate on behalf of the Company for the distribution of its television home shopping service. INVESTMENT AGREEMENT Pursuant to the Investment Agreement by and between the Company and GE Capital dated March 8, 1999 (the "Investment Agreement"), the Company will sell to GE Capital 5,339,500 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value (the "Preferred Stock") for an aggregate of $44,265,000 (or approximately $8.29 per share). The Preferred Stock is convertible into an equal number of shares of the Company's Common Stock, $.01 par value ("Common Stock"), subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, has a mandatory redemption on the 10th anniversary of its issuance or upon a "change of control" at its stated value ($8.29 per share), participates in dividends on the same basis as the Common Stock and has a liquidation preference over the Common Stock and any other junior securities. So long as NBC or GE Capital is entitled to designate a nominee to the Board of Directors (the "ValueVision Board") of the Company (see discussion under "Shareholder Agreement" below), the holders of the Preferred Stock shall be entitled to a separate class vote on the directors subject to nomination by NBC and GE Capital. During such period of time, such holders will not be entitled to vote in the election of any other directors, but will be entitled to vote on all other matters put before shareholders of the Company (including on the matter involving approval of the Investment Warrant described below) on an as converted basis. Consummation of the sale of 3,739,500 shares of the Preferred Stock (the "Initial Closing") is subject to clearance of the transaction with the Federal Trade Commission (the "Governmental Clearance"), and with respect to approximately 1.6 million shares of the Preferred Stock, is subject to Shareholder Approval. The Federal Trade Commission notified the Company on April 5, 1999 that it had granted the Company early termination with respect to the 30 day waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"). In light of this development, the Company expects that the closing of the sale of the 3,739,500 shares of Preferred Stock not subject to shareholder approval, the Investment Warrant and the Distribution Warrant will take place during the week of April 12, 1999. Closing on the sale of the remaining shares of Preferred Stock and exercisability of the Investment Warrant is subject to Shareholder Approval. The Investment Agreement may be terminated by mutual consent or if the Initial Closing is not consummated by August 31, 1999. The Investment Agreement also provides that the Company will issue GE Capital a common stock purchase warrant (the "Investment Warrant") to acquire the number of shares of the Common Stock that would result in the combined beneficial ownership by GE Capital and NBC of 39.9% of the Company at the time of exercise subject to certain limitations set forth in the Investment Warrant. Subject to shareholder approval, the Investment Warrant is immediately exercisable, has a term of 5 years from the date of issuance and its exercise price during the first two years of the term of the Investment Warrant is the greater of (i) the 9 10 45-day average closing price of the underlying Common Stock ending on the trading day prior to exercise, (ii) the 150-day average closing price of the underlying Common Stock ending on the trading day prior to exercise, or (iii) $12 per share, and during the last three years of the term of the Investment Warrant is the greater of (i) the 45-day average closing price of the underlying Common Stock ending on the trading day prior to the exercise or (ii) $15 per share. Exercisability of the Investment Warrant and issuance of approximately 1.6 million shares of the Preferred Stock (the "Second Closing"), in addition to obtaining the Governmental Clearance noted above, is also subject to Shareholder Approval. SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, upon closing of the sale of the Preferred Stock, the Company and GE Capital will enter into a Shareholder Agreement (the "Shareholder Agreement") providing for certain corporate governance and standstill matters. The Shareholder Agreement (together with the Certificate of Designation of the Preferred Stock) provides that GE Capital and NBC will be entitled to designate nominees for an aggregate of 2 out of 7 board seats so long as their aggregate beneficial ownership is at least equal to 50% (or 75% if Shareholder Approval is not obtained) of their initial beneficial ownership, and 1 out of 7 board seats so long as their aggregate beneficial ownership is at least 10% of the "adjusted outstanding shares of Common Stock" (or 50% of their initial beneficial ownership if Shareholder Approval is not obtained). GE Capital and NBC have also agreed to vote their shares of Common Stock in favor of the Company's nominees to the ValueVision Board in certain circumstances. All committees of the ValueVision Board will include a proportional number of directors nominated by GE Capital and NBC. The Shareholder Agreement also requires the consent of GE Capital prior to the Company entering into any substantial agreements with certain restricted parties (broadcast networks and internet portals in certain limited circumstances, as defined), as well as taking any of the following actions: (i) issuance of more than 15% of the total voting shares of the Company in any 12 month period (25% in any 24 month period), (ii) payment of quarterly dividends in excess of 5% of the Company market capitalization (or repurchases and redemption of Common Stock with certain exceptions), (iii) entry by the Company into any business not ancillary, complementary or reasonably related to the Company's current business, (iv) acquisitions (including investments and joint ventures) or dispositions exceeding the greater of $35.0 million or 10% of the Company's total market capitalization, or (v) incurrence of debt exceeding the greater of $40.0 million or 30% of the Company's total capitalization. Pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement, so long as GE Capital and NBC have the right to name at least one nominee to the ValueVision Board, the Company will provide them with certain monthly, quarterly and annual financial reports and budgets. In addition, the Company has agreed not to take actions which would cause the Company to be in breach of or default under any of its material contracts (or otherwise require a consent thereunder) as a result of acquisitions of the Common Stock by GE Capital or NBC. The Company is also prohibited from taking any action that would cause any ownership interest of certain FCC regulated entities from being attributable to GE Capital, NBC or their affiliates. The Shareholder Agreement provides that during the Standstill Period (as defined in the Shareholder Agreement), and with certain limited exceptions, GE Capital and NBC shall be prohibited from: (i) any asset/business purchases from the Company in excess of 10% of the total fair market value of the Company's assets, (ii) increasing their beneficial ownership above 39.9% of the Company's shares, (iii) making or in any way participating in any solicitation of proxies, (iv) depositing any securities of the Company in a voting trust, (v) forming, joining, or in any way becoming a member of a 13D Group with respect to any voting securities of the Company, (vi) arranging any financing for, or providing any financing commitment specifically for, the purchase of any voting securities of the Company, (vii) otherwise acting, whether alone or in concert with others, to seek to propose to the Company any tender or exchange offer, merger, business combination, restructuring, liquidation, recapitalization or similar transaction involving the Company, or nominating any person as a director of the Company who is not nominated by the then incumbent directors, or proposing any matter to be voted upon by the shareholders of the Company. If during the Standstill Period any inquiry has been made regarding a "takeover transaction" or "change in control" which has not been rejected by the ValueVision Board, or the ValueVision Board pursues such a transaction, or engages in negotiations or provides information to a third party and the ValueVision Board has not resolved to terminate such 10 11 discussions, then GE Capital or NBC may propose to the Company a tender offer or business combination proposal. In addition, unless GE Capital and NBC beneficially own less than 5% or more than 90% of the adjusted outstanding shares of Common Stock, GE Capital and NBC shall not sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any securities of the Company except for transfers: (i) to certain affiliates who agree to be bound by the provisions of the Shareholder Agreement, (ii) which have been consented to by the Company, (iii) pursuant to a third party tender offer, provided that no shares of Common Stock may be transferred pursuant to this clause (iv) to the extent such shares were acquired upon exercise of the Investment Warrant on or after the date of commencement of such third party tender offer or the public announcement by the offeror thereof or that such offeror intends to commence such third party tender offer, (v) pursuant to a merger, consolidation or reorganization to which the Company is a party, (vi) in a bona fide public distribution or bona fide underwritten public offering, (vii) pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act, or (viii) in a private sale or pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act; provided that, in the case of any transfer pursuant to clause (vi) or (viii), such transfer does not result in, to the knowledge of the transferor after reasonable inquiry, any other person acquiring, after giving effect to such transfer, beneficial ownership, individually or in the aggregate with such person's affiliates, of more than 10% of the adjusted outstanding shares of the Common Stock. The Standstill Period will terminate on the earliest to occur of (i) the 10 year anniversary of the Shareholder Agreement, (ii) the entering into by the Company of an agreement that would result in a "change in control" (subject to reinstatement), (iii) an actual "change in control," (iv) a third party tender offer (subject to reinstatement), and (v) six months after GE Capital and NBC can no longer designate any nominees to the ValueVision Board. Following the expiration of the Standstill Period pursuant to clause (i) or (v) above (indefinitely in the case of clause (i) and two years in the case of clause (v)), GE Capital and NBC's beneficial ownership position may not exceed 39.9% of the Company's fully-diluted outstanding stock, except pursuant to issuance or exercise of any warrants or pursuant to a 100% tender offer for the Company. REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, at the Initial Closing, the Company and GE Capital will enter into a Registration Rights Agreement providing GE Capital, NBC and their affiliates and any transferees and assigns, an aggregate of four demand registrations and unlimited piggy-back registration rights. DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING AGREEMENT NBC and the Company have entered into the Distribution and Marketing Agreement dated March 8, 1999 (the "Distribution Agreement") which provides that NBC shall have the exclusive right to negotiate on behalf of the Company for the distribution of its home shopping television programming service. The agreement has a 10-year term and NBC has committed to delivering an additional 10 million full time equivalent ("FTE") subscribers over the first 42 months of the term. In compensation for such services, the Company will pay NBC an annual fee of $1.5 million (increasing no more than 5% annually) and issue NBC the Distribution Warrant. The exercise price of the Distribution Warrant is approximately $8.29 per share and vests 200,000 shares immediately, with the remainder of the Distribution Warrant vesting 125,000 shares annually over the 10-year term of the Distribution Agreement. The Distribution Warrant is exercisable for five years after vesting. Assuming certain performance criteria above the 10 million FTE homes are met, NBC will be entitled to additional warrants to acquire Common Stock. The Company is seeking shareholder ratification of the issuance of these additional warrants, although the issuance and exercise of such warrants are not conditioned upon obtaining such approval. The Company has a right to terminate the Distribution Agreement after the twenty-fourth, thirty-sixth and forty-second month anniversary if NBC is unable to meet the performance targets. If terminated by the Company in such circumstance, the unvested portion of the Distribution Warrant will expire. In addition, the Company will be entitled to a $2.5 million payment from NBC if the Company terminates the Distribution Agreement as a result of NBC's failure to meet the 24 month performance target. 11 12 If prior to ValueVision's shareholder vote, the Company receives a "material transaction proposal" or "takeover proposal," NBC has the right to (i) terminate the Distribution Agreement or (ii) increase the annual fee payable to NBC to the greater of $5.0 million or 10% of the Company's annual net profits (as defined in the Distribution Agreement). In addition, NBC may terminate the Distribution Agreement if the Company's shareholders do not approve the Investment Warrant or if the Company enters into certain "significant affiliation" agreements or a transaction resulting in a "change of control." LETTER AGREEMENT The Company, GE Capital and NBC have also entered into a non-binding letter of intent dated March 8, 1999 providing for certain cooperative business activities which the parties contemplate pursuing, including but not limited to, development of a private label credit card, development of electronic commerce and other internet strategies, development of programming concepts for the Company and cross channel promotion. Montgomery Ward Alliance During fiscal 1996, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, an Operating Agreement, a Credit Card License and Receivable Sales Agreement, and a Servicemark License Agreement (collectively, the "MW Agreements") with Montgomery Ward. Under the MW Agreements, Montgomery Ward purchased 1,280,000 unregistered shares of common stock of the Company at $6.25 per share, which represented approximately 4.4% of the then issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, and received warrants to purchase an additional 25 million shares of common stock of the Company. These warrants had exercise prices ranging from $6.50 to $17.00 per share, with an average exercise price of $9.16 per share (the "Warrants"). The value assigned to the Warrants of $17,500,000 was determined pursuant to an independent appraisal. On June 7, 1996, the Company signed a non-bindingnon- binding Memorandum of Understanding with Montgomery Ward pursuant to which the companies agreed to the expansion and restructuring of their ongoing operating 9 10 and license agreements as well as the Company's acquisition of substantially all of the assets and assumption of certain obligations of MWD. Effective July 27, 1996, the companies reached definitive agreements and closed the transaction in the third quarter ended October 31, 1996. Pursuant to the provisions of the agreements, the Company's sales promotion rights were expanded beyond television home shopping to include the full use of the servicemark of Montgomery Ward for direct-mail catalogs and ancillary promotions. In addition, the strategic alliance between the companies had been restructured and amended such that (i) 18 million warrants not immediately exercisable granted to Montgomery Ward in August 1995 and with exercise prices ranging from $7.00 - $17.00 were terminated in exchange for the issuance by the Company of 1,484,467 new immediately exercisable warrants exercisable at $0.01 per share, and valued at $5.625 per warrant, which approximated the book value of the 18,000,000 unvested warrants returned as of the date of the transaction, (ii) the Company issued 1,484,993 new immediately exercisable warrants, valued at $5.625 per warrant and exercisable at $0.01 per share, to Montgomery Ward as full consideration for the acquisition of approximately $4.0 million in net assets, representing substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of MWD, (iii) Montgomery Ward committed to provide $20 million in supplemental advertising support over a five-year period, (iv) the Montgomery Ward operating agreements and licenses were amended and expanded, as defined in the agreements, and extended to July 31, 2008 and (v) the Company issued to Montgomery Ward new immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 2.2 million shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share in exchange for 7 million immediately exercisable warrants granted to Montgomery Ward in August 1995 which were exercisable at prices ranging from $6.50 - $6.75 per share. The fair value of the warrants approximated the book value of the warrants exchanged. The Operating Agreement has a twelve-year term and may be terminated under certain circumstances as defined in the agreement. Effective November 1, 1997, the Company restructured its operating agreement with Montgomery Ward, which governsgoverned the use of the Montgomery Ward name. In exchange for Montgomery Ward's return to ValueVision of warrants covering the purchase of 3,842,143 shares of ValueVision common stock (representing all remaining warrants held by Montgomery Ward), theThe Company ceded exclusive use of the Montgomery Ward name for catalog, mail order, catalog "syndications" and television shopping programming back to Montgomery Ward. Under the agreement, the Company has ceased the use of the Montgomery Ward name in all outgoing catalog, syndication, and mail order communication through March 31, 1998, with a wind down of incoming orders and customer service permitted after March 31, 1998. The agreement also includesincluded the reduction of Montgomery Ward's minimum commitment to support ValueVision's cable television spot advertising purchases. Under the new terms, Montgomery Ward's commitment iswas reduced from $4 million to $2 million annually, and the time period was decreased from five years to three years effective November 1, 1997. In addition, the agreement limitslimited the Company to offer the Montgomery Ward credit card only in conjunction with its various television offers and subject to the normal approvals by the credit card grantor. The Company has accounted for the restructuring of the Operating Agreement has a twelve-year term and may be terminated under certain circumstances as an exchange or disposition of assets at fair value,defined in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29. The return of the warrants, which were valued at approximately $19,211,000, represents consideration given by Montgomery Ward for the assets relinquished by the Company, which effectively include the remaining goodwill attributable to the acquisition of MWD, as well as a portion of the Montgomery Ward Operating Agreement and License asset. The warrants were valued at $5.00 per warrant, which represented the fair market value of the Company's stock on October 22, 1997, the date on which ValueVision and Montgomery Ward reached agreement on the terms and consideration of the restructuring agreement and the date the transaction was effectively announced. The warrant return has been reflected as a reduction in shareholders' equity for the fair value of the warrants, and the intangible asset amounts reflecting the assets sold back to Montgomery Ward have been reduced accordingly to their remaining estimated fair values as determined through analysis of future cash flows and benefits to be received. The difference between the consideration given by the Company (the assets sold back to Montgomery Ward) and the consideration received (the warrants returned to the Company) was not material. The agreement also called for the repurchase by the Company of 1,280,000 shares of its common stock owned by Montgomery Ward, at a price of $3.80 per share. This repurchase was completed on January 15, 1998. Management does not believe that this restructuring will have any other material impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. 10 11agreement. Net Radio Network In March 1997, the Company acquired a 15% interest in Net Radio Corporation ("Net Radio") for an aggregate purchase price of $3 million, consisting of $1 million in cash and a commitment to provide $2 million in future advertising. In addition, under certain circumstances, the Company had the right to acquire an additional 5% of Net Radio for $500,000. In March 1999, the Company agreed to fix this option to acquire 550,000 shares of Net Radio subject to certain adjustments. As of January 31, 1999, the Company has provided Net Radio with $338,000 of advertising. Net Radio is a music and entertainment site on the Internet. Navarre Corporation, a leading national distributor of music, computer software and interactive CD ROM products, owns the remaining 85% of Net Radio. The Company's 24-hour per day shopping program is currently being carried by Net Radio. This investment allowsgives ValueVision another potential avenue to establish a foothold in providingprovide electronic commerce on the Internet. Additionally, ValueVision has been granted exclusive rights for most merchandise categories (other than music or similar items currently sold by NetRadio or Navarre Corporation) to be made available in Net Radio's program marketplace.marketplace, provided that the Company can provide such merchandise at prices comparable to other vendors. 12 13 D. MARKETING AND MERCHANDISING Electronic Media The Company's television revenues are generated from sales of merchandise and services offered through its television home shopping programming. ValueVision's programming features recognizable on-air television home shopping network personalities, many of whom have built a following on other home shopping programs. The sales environment is friendly and informal. As a part of its programming, the Company provides live, on-air telephone interaction between the on-air host and customers. Such customer testimonials give credibility to the products and provide entertainment value for the viewers. The Company's television home shopping networkbusiness utilizes live television 24 hours per day, seven days a week, to create an interactive and entertaining atmosphere to effectively describe and demonstrate the Company's merchandise. Selected customers participate through live conversations with on-air hosts and occasional celebrity guests. The Company believes its customers make purchases based primarily on convenience and quality of merchandise and availability of brand name value.merchandise. The Company employs a variety of techniques for marketing the products sold on the air including, among others, segmented merchandising programsproduces targeted, themed, and merchandise-themed, in-studio and live remote "specials" to supplement the general merchandise offering format.programs, in studio, including the Sports Page, The Coin Collector, Italian Romance, Home Accents, Electronics Today, The New York Collection, Brilliante, Ultimate Ice, It's About Time, Gems at Large and others. The Company supplements it's studio programming with occasional live on-location programs, which in the last year included shows from the New York garment district, the gold producing region of Arezzo, Italy, the Comdex Computer Show, and The Carol Baldwin Charity Golf Tournament. The Company believes that its customers are primarily women between the ages of 35 and 55, with household income of approximately $35,000 to $45,000. The typical viewer is from a household with a professional or managerial primary wage earner. ValueVision schedules its special segments at different times of the day and week to appeal to specific viewer and customer profiles. The Company also produces special theme programs for events such as Father's Day, Mother's Day and Valentine's Day. The Company features frequent and occasionally unannounced, special bargain, discount and inventory-clearance sales in order to, among other reasons, encourage customer loyalty or add new customers. The Company produces segmented merchandising programs and merchandise-themed, in-studio and occasional remote "specials" to supplement the general merchandise offering format, including The Doll Collector, The Sports Page, The Coin Collector, Italian Romance, Home Accents, Silver Styles, Everything Electric, New York Collection, The Personal Jeweler, Brillante, Ultimate Ice and Estate Collectibles. In addition to the Company's daily produced television home shopping programming, the Company may from time to time test other types of strategies, including localized home shopping programming in conjunction with retailers and other catalogers. The Company may seek to enter into joint ventures, acquisitions or similar arrangements with other consumer merchandising companies, e-commerce and other television home shopping companies, television stations, networks or programmers to complement or expand the Company's television home shopping business. Most of the Company's cable lease and affiliation agreements provide for cross channel 30-second promotional spots. The Company purchases advertising time on other cable channels to advertise specialty shows and other special promotions. The Company prominently features its on-air hosts in advertising and promotion of its programming. The Company's television home shopping merchandise is generally offered at or below retail prices. Jewelry accounted for approximately 60%74% of the Company's television home shopping net sales in fiscal 19981999 compared to 60% in fiscal 1998 and 62% in fiscal 1997 and 73% in fiscal 1996.1997. Giftware, collectibles and related merchandise, apparel, electronics, housewares, 11 12 seasonal items and other merchandise comprise the remaining sales. The Company continually introduces new items with additional merchandise selection chosen from available inventories of previously featured products. Inventory sources include manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors inventory liquidators and importers. ValueVision has also developed several lines of private label merchandise that are targeted to its viewer/customer preferences, including Brillante(R)Brillante(TM), C-Band,C-Band(TM), Day Wear,Wear(TM), Illusions(TM), New York Collections(TM)Collection(TM) and Vincenza Collections(TM)Gems at Large(TM). The Company intends to continue to promote private label merchandise, which generally has higher than average margins. The Company also may negotiate with celebrities, including television, motion picture and sports stars, for the right to develop various licensed products and merchandising programs which may include occasional on-air appearances by the celebrity. In 1991, the Company introduced its Video Shopping Cart(SM) service. The Video Shopping Cart allows customers to order as many items as often as they wish during a 24-hour period between midnight to midnight 13 14 each day, and pay a single shipping and handling charge for the entire order (currently $11.95; $16.95$12.95; $17.95 to households in Alaska and Hawaii). Substantially all of the Company's merchandise qualifies for inclusion in a customer's Video Shopping Cart, except for certain large items, items over $300, items placed on the "ValuePay" installment payment program or items that are direct-shipped from the vendor. The Company transmits daily programming instantaneously to cable operators, full and low power television stations, and satellite dish owners by means of a communications satellite. In March 1994, the Company entered into a 12-year satellite lease on a new Hughes Communication cable programming satellite offering transponders to the cable programming industry, including the Company. Under certain circumstances, the Company's transponder could be preemptedpreempted. The Company has an agreement for immediate back-up satellite service if satellite transmission is interrupted. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue transmission of its programming in the event of satellite transmission failure and the Company currently has not contracted for backup services.may incur substantial additional costs to enter into new back-up service arrangements. Print Media VVDM, through HomeVisions, is a direct-mail marketer of a broad range of quality general merchandise which is sold to consumers through direct-mail catalogs. Products offered include domestics, housewares, home accessories and electronics. HomeVisions' principal direct marketing vehicle is its home decor and furnishings catalog, a full-color booklet of approximately 50 to 100 pages that is mailed semi-monthly to its customer list and to individuals whose names are generated from mailing lists rented by HomeVisions. HomeVisions also produces and mails special issues during the holiday season and produces inventory clearance catalogs. Historically, a significant portion of HomeVisions' catalogs have been targeted to Montgomery Ward credit card account holders. CVI markets a variety of merchandise through five consumer specialty catalogs under distinct titles. The catalogs are mailed seasonally and are targeted to middlemiddle- and upper-income women aged 35-55 years old. Catalog titles offered by CVI include: (i) Nature's Jewelry(R) -- offering moderately-priced, nature-themed jewelry, apparel and gifts; (ii) The Pyramid Collection(TM) -- offering a wide array of self-improvement, spiritually oriented and New Age books, tapes and CD's as well as jewelry and gifts with related themes; (iii) Serengeti(R) -- offering jewelry, apparel and gifts based on various wildlife themes; (iv) NorthStyle(R) -- "America's Nature Gift Catalog", sells "northwoods" or "log cabin" styled home decor and apparel, as well as books, videos and audio products on a similar theme; and (v) The Mind's Eye(R)Catalog Ventures' Favorites(R) -- a nostalgia catalog offering audio, video, games and home products from customers' childhood, some with a collectible component.unique selection of popular merchandise items. BII is a leading direct marketer of women's foundation undergarments and other women's apparel. Products include the Posture X Bra(TM), cotton and denim jumpers and other related products that provide comfort, support and posture enhancement. BII markets its products through newspaper inserts, magazines and other print media as well as through various syndication offers in the credit card billing statements of individual consumers. Favorable Purchasing Terms The Company obtains products for its electronic and print media, direct marketing businesses from domestic and foreign manufacturers and is often able to make purchases on favorable terms based on the 12 13 volume of transactions. Many of the Company's purchasing arrangements with its television home shopping vendors include inventory terms which allow for return privileges or stock balancing. The Company is not dependent upon any one supplier for a significant portion of its inventory. E. ORDER ENTRY, FULFILLMENT AND CUSTOMER SERVICE Products offered through all of the Company's selling mediums, except BII, are available for purchase via toll-free "800" telephone numbers. The Company maintains on-site telephone response centers in its Eden Prairie, Minnesota and Chelmsford, Massachusetts facilities, staffed by call center representatives, each equipped with a terminal on-line with the Company's computerized order response and fulfillment systems. These order response and fulfillment systems have approximately 300 dedicated order entry agent stations, approximately 50 to 90 of which are currently staffed at various times and an additional 100 "flex" order entry stations to handle overflow capacity during peak seasons. The Company's primary telephone system has a 1,400 line capacity, and its primary computer system has a 1,500-agent capacity, both of which can be readily upgraded for additional volume. The Company's telephone systems display up-to-the-second data on the volume of incoming calls, the number of call center representatives on duty, the number of calls being handled and the number of incoming calls, if any, waiting for available call center representatives. The fulfillment systems automatically report and update available merchandise quantities as customers place orders and stock 14 15 is depleted. The Company's computerized systems handle customer order entry, order fulfillment, customer service, merchandise purchasing, on-air scheduling, warehousing, customer record keeping and inventory control. In fiscal 1996, the Company invested in backupback-up power supply systems to ensure that interruptions to the Company's operations due to electrical power outages are minimized. During fiscal 1997, the Company purchased a 262,000 square foot distribution facility in Bowling Green, Kentucky which iswas being used in connection with the fulfillment operations of HomeVisions through fiscal 1999 and is currently being used for the non-jewelry segment of the Company's television home-shoppinghome shopping business. In addition, during fiscal 1997, the Company installed a 192-line Automated Voice Response Unit ("VRU") to capture additional ValueVision customer orders quickly without the assistance of a live call center representative. Customers simply place orders using the touch-tone pad of their telephone. Approximately 25-30%30-35% of dailythe Company's sales orders are taken using the VRU system. The majority of customer purchases are paid by credit card. Commencing in March 1995, customers were able to use either a Montgomery Ward or a ValueVision/Montgomery Ward credit card to charge ValueVision purchases. In accordance with general industry practice,November, 1998, the Company accepts "reservation" orders frominitiated a "Direct Check" program for customers who wish to pay by personal check. Under the program, customer payment information is taken online and processed electronically, thereby allowing customers the flexibility of paying by check without delaying the shipment of their order. The Company does not offer C.O.D. terms to customers. During fiscal 1995, the Company introduced an installment payment program called ValuePay which entitles television home shopping customers to purchase merchandise and generally pay for the merchandise in two to fourfive equal successive monthly installments. The Company intends to continue to sell merchandise using the ValuePay program. Merchandise is shipped to customers via United Parcel Service and the United States Postal Service, which generally results in delivery to the customer within seven to ten days after an order is received. United Parcel Service and the United States Postal Service, through a third-party carrier, pick up merchandise directly at the Company's distribution centers. Orders are generally shipped to customers within 48 hours after the order is placed. The Company also offers Express Mail delivery via the United States Postal Service upon request. The Company's Customer Service departments handle customer inquiries, most of which consist of inquiries with respect to the status of pending orders or returns of merchandise. The customer service representatives are on-line with the Company's computerized order response and fulfillment systems. Being on-line permits access to a customer's purchase history while on the phone with the customer, thus enabling most inquiries and requests to be promptly resolved. The Company considers its order entry, fulfillment and customer service functions as particularly important functions positioned with open capacity to enable it to accommodate future growth. The Company designs all aspects of its infrastructure to meet the needs of the customer and to accommodate future expansion. 13 14 The Company's television home shopping return policy allows a standard 30-day refund period for all customer purchases. The Company's return rates on its television sales have been approximately 27%,26% to 28% over the past three fiscal years, which is slightly higher than the reported historical industry average of approximately 24% to 26%. Management attributes the higher return rate in part to the Video Shopping Cart, as customers are more likely to order additional items on a trial basis when using the Video Shopping Cart; andfact that it generally maintains higher than average unit price points of approximately $83$93 in fiscal 19981999 ($8583 in fiscal 1997)1998). Management believes that the higher return rate is acceptable, given the higher net sales generated and the Company's ability to quickly process returned merchandise at relatively low cost. Generally, the Company maintains a very liberal return policy for its direct-mail operations. The return rate for the Company's direct-mail operations for fiscal 1999 and 1998 was approximately 11% and the Company believes that this return rate is comparable to industry averages. F. COMPETITION The direct marketing and retail businesses are highly competitive. In both its television home shopping, Internet (e-commerce) and direct-mail operations, the Company competes for consumer expenditures with other forms of retail businesses, including department, discount, warehouse and specialty stores, other mail 15 16 order, catalog and television home shopping companies, retailers who sell and market their products through the Internet and other direct sellers. The television home shopping industry is highly competitive and is dominated by two companies, QVC Network, Inc. ("QVC") and HSN, Inc. (formerly known as Home Shopping Network, Inc. ("HSN")). The Company believes that the home shopping industry is attractive to consumers, cable companies, manufacturers and retailers. The industry offers consumers convenience, value and entertainment, and offers manufacturers and retailers an opportunity to test market new products, increase brand awareness and access additional channels of distribution. The Company believes the industry is well positioned to compete with other forms of cable programming for cable air time, as home shopping networks compensate cable television operators, whereas other forms of cable programming receive compensation from cable operators for carriage. The Company competes for cable distribution with all other programmers, including other television home shopping networks such as Shop at Home, Inc. ("SATH"), QVC and HSN. The Company currently competes for viewership and sales with SATH, QVC and HSN, or both companies, in virtually all of its markets. The Company is at a competitive disadvantage in attracting viewers due to the fact that the Company's programming is not carried full time in approximately one-half of its markets, and that the Company may have less desirable cable channels in many markets. The Company expects increasing competition for viewers/customers and for experienced home shopping personnel from major cable systems, television networks, e-commerce and other retailers that may seek to enter television home shopping. The continued evolution and consolidation of retailers on the Internet, together with strategic alliances being formed by other television home shopping networks and Internet companies will also result in increased competition. The Company will also compete to lease cable television time toand enter into cable affiliation agreements, and to acquire full power broadcast television stations.agreements. Entry and ultimate success in the television home shopping industry is dependent upon several key factors, the most significant of which is obtaining carriage on cable systems reaching an adequate number of subscribers. The Company believes that the number of new entrants into the television home shopping industry will continue to increase. The Company believes that it is strategically positioned to compete because of its established relationships with cable operators and its current intentionsnew strategic relationship with NBC and GE Capital pursuant to acquire additional television stations inwhich NBC will provide the event that stations in strategic markets can be acquired at favorable prices, however, noCompany with cable affiliation and distribution services. No assurance can be given however, that the Company will be able to acquire cable carriage or additional television stations at prices favorable to the Company. New technological and regulatory developments may also increase competition and the Company's costs. In April 1997, theThe FCC has adopted rules for digital television ("DTV") that will allow full power television stations to broadcast multiple channels of digital data simultaneously on the bandwidth presently used by one normal analog channel. FCC rules will allow broadcasters to use this additional capacity to provide new services,conventional programming, including home shopping video delivery andprogramming, as well as ancillary or supplementary services, including interactive data transfer. The FCC has determined to charge a fee for the provision of ancillary or supplementary services, but not for home shopping programming. See "Federal Regulation". Every full power television station in operation has been assigned an additional channel on which to broadcast DTV until analog transmissions are terminated. Station affiliates of the four major networks in the top ten markets must be on the air with a DTV signal by May 1, 1999; network affiliates in the top thirty markets must be on the air by November 1, 1999. In addition, fouras of December 1998, three direct broadcast satellite ("DBS") systems currently transmitand one fixed satellite service ("FSS") system transmitted programming to subscribers, and at least three other companies havehad been issued licenses to provide DBS service. One foreign company iswas also authorized to operate earth stations in the United States that receive signals from a 14 15 Mexican satellite. As of June 1997,1998, there were nearly 5.1more than 7.2 million DBS and FSS subscribers. The DBS industry is developing antennas to improve over-the-air broadcast transmission reception for DBS subscribers, and at least one DBS systemOne company has approvedannounced plans to transmit local broadcast signals.provide local-into-local service to DBS operators for the entire United States, and DBS equipment prices and other "up-front costs," such as installation, have been declining significantly. Furthermore, satellite master antenna television systems ("SMATV") have begun to deliver video programming to multiple dwelling units. SMATV systems receive and process satellite signals at on-site facilities and then distribute the programming to individual units. It is estimated that there were 1,126,000Estimates of the number of SMATV residential subscribers as of June 30, 1997. Finally,1998 range from approximately 800,000 to 1.6 million subscribers. Additionally, a number of telephone companies have acquired cable franchises, and obtainedone local exchange carrier is using very high speed digital subscriber line 16 17 technology to deliver video programming, high-speed Internet access, and telephone service over existing copper telephone lines in Phoenix, Arizona. The FCC certificationhas also certified 11 operators to operateoffer open video systems ("OVS") in order to provide video programming to customers. These developments could have the effect of increasing home shopping competitors to include firms with substantial financial and technical ability. Developing alternative technologies couldCurrently, only two OVS systems are operating. Finally, in the future provide outlets for increased competition to the Company's programming. In 1996, the FCC completed auctions for authorizations to provide multichannel multipoint distribution services ("MMDS"), also known as wireless cable. Approximately 1.1 million subscribers now receive traditional video programming through MMDS. Local multipoint distribution servicecable, using Multipoint Distribution Service ("LMDS"MDS"), another technology that allows wireless transmission and reception of video or audio programming or other data, may also compete with cable and traditional broadcast television in the future. In March 1998, the FCC completed the auction of 986 LMDS licenses nationwide. An additional potential competing technology is instructional television fixed serviceleased excess capacity on Instructional Television Fixed Service ("ITFS"). The FCC now allows channels. MMDS subscription fell to 1,050,000 at the educational entitiesend of 1997. However, it is anticipated that hold ITFS licensesthe advent of digital MMDS may improve the industry's financial status. All of these developments could have the effect of increasing competition to lease their "excess" capacity for commercial purposes. The multichannel capacity of ITFS could be combined with either an existing single channel MDS or a new MMDS to increase the number of available channels offered by an individual operator.Company's programming. In its direct-mail operations, the Company competes with other major catalog sales organizations, as well as retail specialty stores, Internet and conventional retailers with substantial catalog operations and other discount retailers and companies that market via computer technology. In addition, the Company's direct-mail catalog operations compete with retailers involved with the evolving convergence and development of electronic commerce as well as other retailers who sell and market their products through the Internet. Management believes that the Company is able to compete effectively by offering its customers a broad range of quality merchandise at competitive or discount prices with a high degree of convenience and reliability. Many of the Company's competitors are larger and more diversified than the Company, or have greater financial, marketing, merchandising and distribution resources. Therefore, the Company cannot predict the degree of success with which it will meet competition in the future. G. NATIONAL MEDIA CORPORATION 1994 Merger Proposal In January 1994, the Company proposed an acquisition of National Media Corporation ("National Media"). National Media is a publicly-held direct marketer of consumer products through the use of direct response transactional television programming, known as infomercials, and currently makes its programming available to more than 370 million television households in more than 70 countries worldwide In February 1994, the Company announced a tender offer for a majority of the outstanding shares of National Media. In March 1994, the Company and National Media entered into a Merger Agreement and the Company modified the terms of its tender offer. In April 1994, the Company terminated its tender offer and the Merger Agreement with National Media asserting inaccurate representations and breach of warranties by National Media, and based upon adverse regulatory developments concerning National Media. Litigation challenging the Company's termination of the tender offer and Merger Agreement was subsequently filed by National Media and its former chief executive officer and president. In addition, shareholders of National Media filed four purported class action lawsuits against the Company and certain officers of the Company. Each of these suits alleged deception and manipulative practices by the Company in connection with the tender offer and Merger Agreement. In fiscal 1996, the Company, National Media and National Media's former chief executive officer and president agreed to dismiss all claims, to enter into joint operating agreements involving telemarketing and post-production capabilities, and to enter into an international joint venture agreement. Under the agreement, the Company received ten-year warrants, which vest over three years, to purchase 500,000 shares of National 15 16 Media's common stock at a price of $8.865 per share. In November 1996, the Company and National Media amended their agreement by providing for the additional payment by the Company to National Media of $1.2 million as additional exercise price for the warrants. As of January 31, 1998, $800,000 has been paid with a final installment of $400,000 to be paid on September 1, 1998. In March 1997, the court gave final approval to a $1.0 million settlement, which was paid by the Company from insurance proceeds, as full settlement in the matter of the class action suits initiated by certain shareholders of National Media. 1998 Merger Proposal On January 5, 1998, the Company entered into aan Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger Agreement,(the "Merger Agreement"), by and among the Company, National Media Corporation ("National Media") and Quantum Direct Corporation. IfCorporation, formerly known as V-L Holdings Corp. ("Quantum Direct"), a newly-formed Delaware corporation. On April 8, 1998, it was announced that the Mergers wereCompany received preliminary notification from holders of more then 5% of the Company's common stock that they intended to be consummated,exercise their dissenter's rights with respect to the proposed merger of the Company and National Media would have become wholly-owned subsidiariesand the Company did not intend to waive the Merger Agreement condition to closing requiring that holders of Quantum Direct, with each outstanding sharenot more than 5% of the Company'sshares of the Company common stock being converted into 1.19 shares of common stock in Quantum Directhave demanded their dissenter's rights. On June 2, 1998, the Company announced that attempts to renegotiate new, mutually acceptable terms and each outstanding share of common stock ofconditions regarding a transaction with National Media being converted into one sharewere unsuccessful and the Merger Agreement was terminated. The Company had incurred approximately $2,350,000 of common stockacquisition related costs and wrote off these amounts in Quantum Direct.the second quarter of fiscal 1999. Concurrently with the execution of the proposed Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to loan (the "Loan") to National Media, pursuant to a Demand Promissory Note, up to an aggregate of $10.0 million (the "Demand Note"), $7.0 million of which was advanced upon signing of the Demand Note on January 5, 1998, andwith the remaining $3.0 million of which has subsequently been advanced.advanced in fiscal 1999. The Loanloan proceeds have beenwere used by National Media for various purposes, including the funding of accounts receivable, inventory and media purchases. The Loan bearsloan included interest at the prime rate plus 1.5% per annum and iswas due on the earlier of January 1, 1999 or upon termination of the Merger Agreement in certain circumstances. In the event National Media is unable to repay the Loan when due, ValueVision may elect to receive payment in shares of National Media's common stock at the then present market value. In consideration for providing the Loan, National Media issued to ValueVision warrants to acquire 250,000 shares of National Media's common stock withat an exercise price of $2.74 per share equaland amended the exercise price of previously issued warrants to $2.74. The warrants are exercisable untilpurchase 500,000 shares of common stock from $8.865 per share to $2.74 per share. In December 1998, National Media repaid the earlier of (i) January 5, 2003$10 million Demand Note in full, plus accrued interest, and (ii) the occurrence of oneCompany exercised the 750,000 National Media warrants. During fiscal 1999, the Company sold 460,000 shares of the following termination events: (x) the consummation of the Merger or (y) the termination by National Media of the Merger Agreement, if such termination results from a breach of a covenant by ValueVision or in the event ValueVision's shareholders do not approve the Merger Agreement; provided, however, that if, within 75 days after the termination event described in clause (y) above, National Media has not repaid the Loan in full or if during such 75 days, National Media defaults under its obligations pursuant to the Loan, no termination event will be deemed to have occurred and the warrants shall remain exercisable. Consummation of the Mergers is subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of a number of conditions, including, but not limited to: (i) approval by holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of National Media's common stock and ValueVision's common stock; (ii) redemption ofrecognized a $2,972,000 gain on the sale. In addition, included in fiscal 1999 earnings is a $1,350,000 unrealized holding gain related to the remaining 290,000 National Media's Series C Preferred Stock; (iii)Media shares held by the receipt of certain regulatory and other approvals, including those fromCompany. These shares are classified as "trading securities" in the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communication Commission; and (iv) not more than 5% of the holders of the issued and outstanding shares ofaccompanying January 31, 1999 consolidated balance sheet as it is the Company's common stock shall have made demands and given the notices required under Minnesota lawintent to assert dissenters' appraisal rights. On April 8, 1998, it was announced that the Company received preliminary notification from holders of more than 5% of the Company's common stock that they intended to exercise their dissenter's rights with respect to the proposed merger of the Company and National Media. The Company also reported that it had advised National Media that it does not intend to waive the Merger Agreement condition to closing requiring that holders of not more than 5% of the shares of the Company's common stock have demanded their dissenter's rights. The Company and National Media had special meetings of their shareholders scheduled on April 14, 1998 to vote on the Mergers. In light of the receipt of the dissenters' notice, the companies mutually agreed to postpone their respective shareholder meetings while the companies attempt to negotiate a restructuring of the Mergers that is acceptable to each of the companies andsell these securities in the best interest of their shareholders. As of the date hereof, National Media and the Company are still attempting to negotiate a 16near future. 17 17 restructuring of the Mergers and have not rescheduled their respective special meetings. There can be no assurance that the companies will be able to successfully negotiate such a restructuring, or if negotiated, that such Mergers will be consummated. On March 30, 1998, the Company and National Media announced the selection of veteran marketing, direct response and retail executive, Gene McCaffery, 50, as Chief Executive Officer of Quantum Direct. Mr. McCaffery brings to Quantum Direct 25 years in retail and marketing experience, as well as substantial executive experience. He most recently served as Chief Executive Officer and managing partner of Marketing Advocates, a celebrity-driven product and service development company based in Los Angeles, California. Mr. McCaffery was formerly Senior executive Vice President of Montgomery Ward, in charge of its merchandising, strategic planning, advertising and marketing operations before leaving in 1996 to start Marketing Advocates. While at Montgomery Ward, Mr. McCaffery also oversaw The Signature Group, one of the nation's largest direct marketing companies, and also served as Vice-Chairman of the Board of ValueVision from August 1995 to March 1996. Mr. McCaffery served as an infantry officer in the Vietnam War and was appointed as Civilian Aide to the Secretary of the Army by President George Bush in 1991, a position that he still holds. Mr. McCaffery and Quantum Direct have entered into a three year employment agreement pursuant to which Mr. McCaffery will become Chief Executive Officer of Quantum Direct, and receive a base salary of $500,000 during the first year, $525,000 during the second year, and $550,000 during the third year. The agreement also provides for bonus salary of up to 100% of the base salary, which may be earned only upon Quantum Direct meeting certain operating income, revenue and stock performance criteria. In addition, pursuant to the agreement, Mr. McCaffery is being issued stock options to acquire 800,000 shares of Quantum Direct's common stock, $.01 par value, with an exercise price equal to $3.375 per share, the last trading price of ValueVision's common stock on March 30, 1998. The exercise price of such options will be adjusted to the last trading price of Quantum Direct's common stock on the first day it trades, to the extent such price is lower than $3.375. Of such options, 200,000 vest monthly on a pro rata basis over the term of the employment agreement, and 600,000 vest on the earlier of the fifth anniversary of Mr. McCaffery's start date (provided he is still an employee of Quantum Direct) or in equal 20% (120,000 share) blocks based on the average closing price of Quantum's common stock for 20 consecutive trading days being at $5.00, $6.00, $7.00, $8,00 and $9.00, respectively. Such options are being issued as a stand-alone plan of Quantum Direct, outside of Quantum Direct's 1998 Equity Participation Plan. The employment agreement generally provides for a one year non-compete. In addition, in the event of a change of control (as defined) of Quantum Direct, Mr. McCaffery's employment can be terminated by Quantum Direct or Mr. McCaffery in certain circumstances. In the event of such a termination, Mr. McCaffery would be entitled to receive the base salary and bonus salary remaining to be paid through the end of the term of the employment agreement, together with accrued benefits. In the event the Mergers are not consummated, ValueVision and Mr. McCaffery have agreed to enter into an employment agreement on substantially the same terms pursuant to which Mr. McCaffery would become the Chief Executive Officer of ValueVision.18 H. FEDERAL REGULATION The cable television industry, the acquisition, ownership and operation of full and low power television stations and the broadcasting industry in general are subject to extensive regulation by the FCC. The following does not purport to be a complete summary of all of the provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Communications Act"), the Cable Television Consumer Protection Act of 1992 (the "Cable Act"), the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the "Telecommunications Act") or the FCC rules or policies that may affect the operations of the Company. Reference is made to the Communications Act, the Cable Act, the Telecommunications Act and regulations and public notices promulgated by the FCC for further information. The laws and regulations affecting the industries are subject to change, including through pending proposals. There can be no assurance that laws, rules or policies that may have an adverse effect on the Company will not be enacted or promulgated at some future date. 17 18 Cable Television The cable industry is regulated by the FCC under the Cable Act and FCC regulations promulgated thereunder. "LeasedLeased Access." Cable systems are generally required to make up to 15% of their channel capacity available for lease by nonaffiliated programmers. Little use has been made of leased access because of the prohibitively high lease rates charged by cable systems. The Cable Act directs the FCC to establish procedures to regulate the rates, terms and conditions of cable time leases so as to encourage leased access. The maximum leased access rates that cable systems may charge nonaffiliated programmers such as the Company are unsettled because the rules governing those rates have recently been amended and are subject to the filing of petitions for reconsideration and judicial review. In May 1993, the FCC first issued rules limiting leased access rates to the "highest implicit fee" of any channel on a cable system, which was calculated by subtracting the license fee the cable operator paid each programmer on the system to carry its channel from the system's average subscriber charge for a channel and using the highest of those differences. These rules often allowed cable operators to increase lease rates and affected the Company's ability to gain carriage on some systems. The FCC released its most recent revisions to these rules in February 1997. These recent revisions adopted an "implicit fee" formula similar to the one already in place. However, instead of capping lease rates at the "highest implicit fee," the new rules capped rates at the "average implicit fee" for a channel on a cable system, which is the difference between the average subscriber charge for a channel and the average license fee the cable operator pays to carry programming. The rules have changed the base of cable channels on which the averageIt is calculated in a way that makes it unclear whether or to what extent the revised rules will affect the maximum lease rates that the Company must pay for carriage in any particular case. The Company's limited experience has been that the rates remain largely unaffordable, although the rules do permit cable operators to charge less than the maximum rates. The FCC also established rules governing the process of negotiating for carriage, making other changes to the terms and conditions of leased access carriage and making it easier for programmers like the Company to lease channels for less than a full 24-hour day. The Company has petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of the rate formula portions of the recent revisions to the rules. Both the Company's petition for review and a similar petition are currently pending. There can be no guarantee that the Company will succeed on its petition for review or, if it does succeed, that the rules that the FCC would adopt in place of the current formula would not have a material adverse effect on the Company. "MustMust Carry." In general, the FCC's current "must carry" rules under the Cable Act entitle full power television stations to mandatory cable carriage of their signals, at no charge, to all cable homes located within each station's ADI provided that the signal is of adequate strength, and the cable system has "must carry" designated channels available. In March 1997, the Supreme Court upheld in their entirety the "must carry" provisions applicable to full power television stations. The scope of "must carry" rights for future broadcast transmissions of digital television stations ("DTV") stations is as yet uncertain. TheIn July 1998, the FCC is expected to beginbegan a proceeding to determine such rights. No prediction can be made as to the outcome of this proceeding, which is not anticipated until the end of 1999. The FCC has also been asked to reevaluate its July 1993 extension of "must carry" rights to predominantly home shopping television stations. It has yet to reverseact on that decision, butrequest, and there can be no assurance that home shopping television stations will continue to have "must carry" rights. In addition, under the Cable Act, cable systems may petition the FCC to determine that a station is ineligible for "must carry" rights because of such station's lack of service to the community, its previous noncarriage, or other factors. An important factor considered by the FCC in its evaluation of such petitions is whether a given station places Grade B coverage over the community in question. The unavailability of "must carry" rights to the Company's existing or future stations would likely substantially reduce the number of cable homes that could be reached by any full power television station that the Company may acquire. The Company's ability to increase the cable distribution of its programming will be adversely affected in the event of unfavorable judicial, regulatoryacquire or administrative determinations of the validity and application of the "must carry" and "leased access" provisions of the Cable Act and the FCC rules promulgated thereunder. The Company believes, however, that even absent favorable determinations regarding "must carry" and 18 19 "leased access,"on which it will be able to achieve growth through other strategies such as affiliation agreements, block leasing and broadcast television programming. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will achieve sufficient growth through such other strategies, or that cable systems will continue to carry television stations that broadcast the Company'smight provide programming. Closed Captioning. FCC rules require television stations, cable systems and other video programming providers to phase in closed captioning for new programming over an eight-year period, in order to make such programming accessible to the hearing impaired. Home shopping programming is not exempt from this requirement. Several parties have filed petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's order adopting these rules. The rules remain in effect while these petitions are pending, and no prediction can be made as to the outcome of the petitions. These requirements, which could substantially increase the Company's television programming expenses. 18 19 Full Power Television Stations General. The Company's acquisition and operation of full power television stations are subject to FCC regulation under the Communications Act. The Communications Act prohibits the operation of television broadcasting stations except under a license issued by the FCC. This statute empowers the FCC, among other things, to issue, revoke and modify broadcasting licenses, determine the locations of stations, regulate the equipment used by stations, adopt regulations to carry out the provisions of the Communications Act and impose penalties for violation of such regulations. Over-the-air coverage of full power television stations assigned by the FCC to the UHF spectrum, such as the stations that the Company has acquired, is significantly less extensive than that of Very High Frequency ("VHF") stations. FCC Approval of License Transfers. The Company's acquisition and sale of full power television stations will be subject, in each case, to the prior approval of the FCC. The Company has previously been found qualified by the FCC to hold full power television and LPTV licenses, and the Company believes that it should be found qualifiedcontinue to purchase additional full power television stations.hold such licenses. FCC approval, however, is also subject to other conditions, including the filing of petitions to deny or other opposition by interested parties and, accordingly, there can be no assurance of FCC approval. License Grant and Renewal. The Communications Act provides that a broadcast license may be granted to any qualified applicant if the public interest, convenience and necessity will be served thereby, subject to certain limitations. Under these recent changes, applicationsApplications for renewal of a broadcast license must be granted if during the preceding term the station has served the public interest, convenience and necessity; committed no serious violations of the Act or the FCC's regulations; and committed no other violations that would constitute a pattern of abuse. If the licensee cannot satisfy this test, the FCC may deny the renewal application (if there are no mitigating circumstances) or grant it subject to terms and conditions, including renewal for a shorter term. Competing applications for the license at issue are to be accepted only if the FCC denies the renewal application. The new FCC rules implementing the renewal provisions of the Telecommunications Act as yet provide no clear standards for interpretation. A subsidiary of the Company holds a license for one full power television station, KVVV (TV), Baytown, Texas, whose license expires August 1, 1998 and which has pending an application for renewal of license.2006. Television licenses are now issued for a term of eight years. The Company and its subsidiaries have pending applications for construction permits for nineseven full power television stations in the following locations: Douglas, Arizona; Rapid City, South Dakota; Provo, Utah; Destin, Florida; Des Moines, Iowa; Virginia Beach, Virginia; Waterloo, Iowa; Spokane, Washington; and Tallahassee, Florida. In each of these cases, there are competing applications for the construction permits. The Company entered into a settlement agreement with the remaining applicants at Waterloo, Iowa and agreed to dismiss its application in exchange for monetary consideration of $65,000. Approval for this settlement agreement is currently pending before the FCC. With respect to each of the Company's remaining applications, the FCC has proposedintends to conduct an auction and award thea construction permitspermit to the highest bidder in an auction whose rules, proceedings, and timetable have not been established.bidder. The auction will be limited to the mutually exclusive applicants for the initial licenses. However, the FCC will not conduct an auction to select an applicant if it approves a settlement agreement that was filed by February 2, 1998 by the applicants for a construction permit and that removes the conflict between their applications. The Company has entered into timely settlement agreements with the applicants for construction permits at Spokane, Washington; Douglas, Arizona; and 19 20 Waterloo, Iowa. The Company has agreed to dismiss its applications in exchange for monetary consideration of, respectively, $416,666, $50,000, and $65,000. The FCC approved the settlement agreement for Spokane, Washington by order which has not yet become final, andset a date for the settlement agreements for Douglas, Arizona and Waterloo, Iowa are currently pending.auction of these construction permits. Two of the Company's pending applications propose to operate on channels above channel 59: Des Moines, Iowa and Destin, Florida. The FCC has recently concluded that it will not authorize new analog full power television stations on channelchannels 60-69 and that applications for stations on these channels will be dismissed if they are not amended to seek a new channel below channel 60, in accordance with a timetable and procedure not yet established. The Company and others have filed petitionsPetitions for reconsiderationreview of this portionFCC order have been filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the FCC's order. The petition is currently pending, and thereD.C. Circuit. No prediction can be made as to the outcome of this decision. There is no assurance that the FCC will reconsider its Order or that the Company will be able to find available channels below channel 60. Accordingly, the Company's applications for these two stations may be dismissed. SevenFive of the Company's pending applications propose to operate below channel 60: Douglas, Arizona; Rapid City, South Dakota; Provo, Utah; Virginia Beach, Virginia; Waterloo, Iowa; Spokane, Washington; and Tallahassee, Florida. The ultimate permittees of these stations may construct either an analog or digital station on the channel that they are granted. The FCC will not assign these stations an additional channel on which to broadcast DTV until analog transmission is terminated. They may convert from analog to digital on their single channel. If they choose to 19 20 transmit initially in analog, they may, upon application to the Commission, convert their analog facility to DTV at any time during the transition period to DTV, which is currently scheduled to end in 2006. Paxson Communications Corporation has purchased a 49% interest in the Company's subsidiary that has a pending application for a construction permit at Tallahassee, Florida and holds an option to purchase the remaining 51% interest. Multiple Ownership. Under existing FCC regulations governing multiple ownership of broadcast stations, a license to operate a television station will not be granted, unless established waiver standards are met, to any party (or parties under common control) that has an "attributable interest" in another television station with an overlapping service area (as specified by FCC regulations promulgated under the Communications Act). However, the Telecommunications Act directs the FCC to conduct a rulemaking with regard to maintaining, modifying, or eliminating local television cross-ownership limits, which is currently pending. The Commission has recentlyalso commenced a biennial review of other television ownership rules pursuant to Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act, which requires the Commission to review all of its ownership rules every two years and to repeal or modify regulations that are no longer in the public interest. The Commission has requested comment on whether the following rules should be retained, modified, or eliminated: (i) the rule that prohibits, with certain qualifications, any person or entity from having an "attributable interest" in television stations that reach markets containing more than 35% of the national television audience; (ii) the rule that discounts by 50% the audience reach of UHF stations when calculating the national television reach of a licensee of UHF stations; (iii) the rule that prohibits any party or entity with an attributable interest in a television (or radio) station from owning or controlling a daily newspaper in the same locale, and (iv) the rule that prohibits any party or entity with an attributable interest in a television broadcast station from owning or controlling a cable system in the same local community. No prediction can be made as to the outcome of this biennial review. Under FCC regulations, the officers, directors and certain of the equity owners of a television broadcasting company are deemed to have an "attributable interest" in the company, so that there would be a violation of FCC regulations if an officer, director or certain owners of a full power television broadcasting company together held more than the permitted national audience reach, or more than one broadcast station serving the same area, or a daily newspaper or cable system in a television station coverage area. In the case of a corporation controlling or operating television stations, there is generally attribution only to directors and officers and to stockholders who own 5% or more of the outstanding voting stock, except for institutional investors, including mutual funds, insurance companies and banks acting in a fiduciary capacity, which may own up to 10% of the outstanding voting stock without being subject to attribution, provided that such 20 21 stockholders exercise no control over the management or policies of the television broadcasting company. The FCC's multiple ownership restrictions currently do not apply to LPTV stations. The FCC is currently proposing changes to certain aspects of its rules. No prediction can be made as to the outcome of these proposals. Foreign Ownership. Foreign governments, representatives of foreign governments, aliens, representatives of aliens, and corporations and partnerships organized under the laws of a foreign nation are barred from holding broadcast licenses. Aliens may own up to 20% of the capital stock of a licensee corporation, or generally up to 25% of a U.S. corporation which, in turn, has a controlling interest in a licensee. Commercial and Other Limitations. The FCC has eliminated many of its former rules applicable to commercial television stations in order to "deregulate" broadcasting. Nonetheless, a commercial television station remains under an obligation to provide non-entertainment programming that is responsive to issues of concern to its community of license and to provide programming that serves the informational and educational needs of children. The FCC reimposed commercial limits on children's television programs, as required by the Children's Television Act of 1990. In September 1993, the FCC initiated an inquiry to determine whether to reimpose commercial limits on non-children's programs on full power television stations including those that predominantly broadcast home shopping programming (whether on an hourly, daily, weekly, or some other basis). There can be no assurance as to the outcome of this inquiry. 20 21 Low Power Television Stations Ownership and operation of LPTV stations are subject to FCC licensing requirements similar to those applicable to full power television stations. LPTV stations, however, are generally not eligible for "must carry" rights. Like full power stations, the transfer of ownership of any LPTV station license requires prior approval by the FCC. LPTV construction permits are granted by the FCC for an initial term of 18 months, which may be extended for one or more six-month terms if there is substantial progress towards station construction unless completion of the station is prevented by causes not under the control of the permittee. LPTV licenses are now issued for terms of eight years. LPTV is a secondary broadcast service that is not permitted to interfere with the broadcast signal of any existing or future full power television station. Construction of a full power television station on the same channel in the same region could therefore force a LPTV station off the air if such interference is not corrected, subject to a right to apply for a replacement channel. LPTV stations must also accept interference from existing and future full power television stations. The advent of DTV is expected to disrupt the operations of the Company's LPTV stations to an as-yet unknown extent. The DTV proceedings have allocated an additional channel to be used for DTV to every eligible full power television station in the nation, effectively doubling the number of channels currently used by full power television stations during the transition period between analog and digital transmissions. A number of these new DTV stations have been allocated to channels currently used by LPTV stations. Construction of these newly authorized DTV stations will therefore force many LPTV stations off the air unless they can find substitute channels. It is not known at this time whether all or some of these "displaced" LPTV stations will be able to modify their broadcast channel and continue operations. The Community Broadcasters Association ("CBA") has filed with the FCC a petition for rulemaking to create a "Class A" TV service, which would, on a prospective basis, avoid unnecessary displacement of LPTV stations that provide substantial local programming to their communities. Under CBA's proposal, qualified LPTV licensees could apply for Class A status within one year of the effective date of the new service class rule. Class A stations would not be permitted to interfere with existing full power and LPTV stations. However, they would have primary spectrum user status, within their principal service contours, against all later authorized full power (DTV and analog) and low power stations. Under certain circumstances, a Class A licensee would be permitted to apply to convert from analog to digital operations and to obtain on a first-come basis an additional channel for digital operations. The FCC has not taken any action on CAB's petition for rulemaking. A similar proposal has been made in legislation currently pending in Congress. Alternative Technologies Alternative technologies could increase the types of systems on which the Company may seek carriage. FourThree DBS systems and one FSS system currently provide service to the public and three additional companies currently hold licenses to provide DBS services. The number of DBS and FSS subscribers has increased to approximately 5.1more than 7.2 million households since July 1996.households. Approximately 1.1 million1,050,000 households now subscribe to wireless cable systems, also known as MMDS systems, which provide traditional video programming and are beginning to provide advanced data transmission services. The FCC has completed auctions for MMDS licenses throughout the nation. LMDS is another technology that allows wireless transmission and reception of video or audio programming or other data; one LMDS system is presently operational in the New York area and the FCC auctioned 986 LMDS licenses nationwide in March 1998. Similar service can be offered by instructional 21 22 television fixed service ("ITFS"). The FCC now allows the educational entities that hold ITFS licenses to lease their "excess" capacity for commercial purposes. The multichannel capacity of ITFS could be combined with either an existing single channel MDS or a new MMDS to increase the number of available channels offered by an individual operator. Lastly, the emergence of home satellite dish antennas has also made it possible for individuals to receive a host of video programming options via satellite transmission. Advanced Television Systems Technological developments in television transmission will in the near future make it possible for the broadcast and nonbroadcast media to provide advanced television services ("ATV") -- television services provided using digital or other advanced technologies. The FCC in late 1996 approved a DTV technical standard to be used by television broadcasters, television set manufacturers, the computer industry and the motion picture industry. This DTV standard will allowallows the simultaneous transmission of multiple streams of digital data on the bandwidth presently used by a normal analog channel. It will beis possible to broadcast one "high definition" channel ("HDTV") with visual and sound quality superior to present-day television or several "standard definition" 21 22 channels ("SDTV") with digital sound and pictures of a quality slightly better than present television; to provide interactive data services, including visual or audio transmission, on multiple channels simultaneously; or to provide some combination of these possibilities on the multiple channels allowed by DTV. In April 1997, the FCC announced that it would allocate to every existing television broadcaster one additional channel to be used for DTV during the transition between present-day analog television and DTV. Broadcasters willare not be required to pay for this new DTV channel, but will be required to relinquish their present analog channel when the transition to DTV is complete. The FCC presently plans for the transition period to end by 2006; broadcasters will at that time be required to return their present channel to the FCC. The FCC's implementation with respect to DTV is currently subject to judicial review. Station affiliates of the four major networks in the top ten markets mustare required to be on the air with a DTV signal by May 1, 1999; network affiliates in the top thirty markets must be on the air by November 1, 1999. All other commercial stations must complete construction by May 1, 2002. The FCC has begun to issue construction permits to build DTV stations. The FCC has recently issued regulations with respect to DTV allocations and interference criteria which are not yet final, and other aspects of the DTV regulatory framework have not yet been established. The FCC is expected to apply to DTV the rules applicable to analogous services in other contexts, including those rules that require broadcasters to serve the public interest and may seek to impose additional programming or other requirements on DTV service. While broadcasters willdo not have to pay for the additional DTV channel itself, in November 1998, the FCC has indicatedruled that a television station which receives compensation from a third party for the ancillary or supplementary use of its DTV spectrum (e.g. data transmission or paging services) must pay a fee of five percent of gross revenue received. The FCC rejected a proposal that fees will likely be imposed upon broadcasters if they choosewhen a broadcaster receives payment for transmitting home shopping programming. A petition for reconsideration of the FCC's ruling with respect to usehome shopping programming is pending, which the DTV channel to provide paid subscription servicesCompany and others have opposed. No prediction can be made as to the public.outcome of this petition for reconsideration. As noted above, neither the Telecommunications Act nor the recent Supreme Court decision resolves the applicability of the "must carry" rules to DTV. The FCC is expected to beginbegan proceedings on this issue.issue in June 1998. It is not anticipated that the FCC will issue a decision until the end of 1999. It is not yet clear when and to what extent DTV or other digital technology will become available through the various media; whether and how television broadcast stations will be able to avail themselves or profit by the transition to DTV; the extent of any potential interference with analog channels; whether viewing audiences will make choices among services upon the basis of such differences; whether and how quickly the viewing public will embrace the cost of the new digital television sets and monitors; to what extent the DTV standard will be compatible with the digital standards adopted by cable, DBS MMDS, LMDS, IVDS, or ITFS;and other services; or whether significant additional expensive equipment will be required for television stations to provide digital service, including HDTV and supplemental or ancillary data transmission services. Pursuant to the Telecommunications Act, the FCC must conduct a ten-year evaluation regarding public interest in advanced television, alternative uses for the spectrum and reduction of the amount of spectrum each licensee utilizes. Many segments of the industry are also intensely studying these advanced technologies. There can be no assurances as to the answers to these questions or the nature of future FCC regulation. 22 23 Telephone Companies' Provision of Programming Services The Telecommunications Act eliminated the previous statutory restriction forbidding the common ownership of a cable system and telephone company. The extent of the regulatory obligations that the Telecommunications Act imposes on a telephone company that selects and provides video programming services to subscribers depends essentially upon whether the telephone company elects to provide its programming over an "open video system" or to do so as a cable operator fully subject to the existing provisions of the Communications Act regulating cable providers. A telephone company that provides programming over an open video system will be subject only to new legislative provisions governing open video systems and to certain specified existing cable provisions of the Communications Act, including requirements equivalent to the "must carry" regulations. Such a telephone company will be required to lease capacity to unaffiliated programmers on a nondiscriminatory basis and may not select the video programming services for carriage on more than one-third of activated channel capacity of the system. Generally, a telephone company that provides video programming but does not operate over an open video platform will be regulated as a cable operator. 22 23 The Company cannot predict how many telephone companies will begin operation of open video systems or otherwise seek to provide video programming services, or whether such video providers will be likely to carry the Company's programming. The FCC has adopted rules that impose on open video systems many of the obligations imposed upon cable systems, including those pertaining to "must carry" and retransmission consent. However, open video systems are not subject to rate regulation and are exempt from local cable franchise requirements. These rules are still subject to judicial review. The FCC has certified seveneleven OVS systems for operationoperators to offer OVS service in 17 areas and threetwo open video systems are currently operating. Moreover, a number of local carriers are continuing to plan to provide video programming as traditional cable systems or through MMDS.MMDS, and one local exchange carrier is using very high speed digital subscriber line technology to deliver video programming, high-speed Internet access, and telephone service over existing copper telephone lines in Phoenix, Arizona. I. SEASONALITY The Company's businesses are subject to seasonal fluctuation, with the highest sales activity normally occurring during the fourth calendar quarter of the year. Seasonal fluctuation in demand is generally associated with the number of households using television and the direct market and retail industries. In addition, the Company's businesses are sensitive to general economic conditions and business conditions affecting consumer spending. J. EMPLOYEES At January 31, 1998,1999, the Company, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, had approximately 1,1001,000 employees, the majority of whom are employed in telemarketing, customer service, order fulfillment and production. Approximately 27%32% of the Company's employees work part-time. The Company is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement with respect to its employees. Management considers its employee relations to be good. 23 24 K. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Set forth below are the names, ages and titles at ValueVision International, Inc., principal occupations and employment for the past five years of the persons serving as executive officers of the Company.
NAME AGE POSITION(S) HELD ---- --- ---------------- Robert L. Johander................... 52Gene C. McCaffery......................... 51 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer Nicholas M. Jaksich.................. 53 President, Chief Operating Officer and Director Gregory D. Lerman.................... 52 Executive Vice President, General Manager ValueVision Television Stuart R. Romenesko.................. 35Romenesko....................... 36 Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary Cary Deacon............................... 47 Senior Vice President, Marketing and Business Development Edwin G. Pohlmann......................... 51 Senior Vice President, Operations David T. Quinby...................... 37Quinby........................... 38 Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Michael L. Jones..................... 40Jon P. Thom............................... 46 Vice President, Television Broadcasting Scott A. Lindquist................... 51 Vice President, AdministrationGeneral Merchandising Manager
Robert L. Johander, a founder ofGene C. McCaffery joined the Company has served asin March 1998, was named Chief Executive Officer in June 1998 and was appointed President and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since June 1990.in February 1999. Mr. Johander's experience in television home shopping began in 1984McCaffery spent 14 years at Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, most recently through 1995 as president of Telethon Marketing Company, where he was responsible for the creation, production, and management of national cable television home shopping programs, which were subsequently acquired by C.O.M.B. Co. ("C.O.M.B."), a Minneapolis-based mail-order liquidator of consumer merchandise. In early 1986, Mr. Johander, as General Manager of C.O.M.B.'s Value Network, conceived and managed the launch of Cable Value Network, Inc., a joint-venture television home shopping network formed by C.O.M.B. and several national cable television system operators. In 1987, C.O.M.B. changed its name to CVN Companies, Inc. ("CVN"), which was subsequently acquired by QVC Network, Inc. Nicholas M. Jaksich, a founder of the Company, has served as President and Chief Operating Officer and as a director of the Company since June 1990. From February 1984 to June 1986, Mr. Jaksich was Vice President, Distribution and Operations for Lillian Vernon Corporation, a national direct-mail merchandising firm. In July 1986, Mr. Jaksich joined C.O.M.B. to assist in the launch of its television activities. His responsibilities included the direct day-to-day supervision of television production and merchandising activities; the development of various television order response, inventory, and sales tracking systems, and supervision of on-air hosts. In 1987, Mr. Jaksich succeeded Mr. Johander as divisional Senior Vice President of CVN-Television, a division of CVN. Gregory D. Lerman joined the Company as Executive Vice President, General Manager ValueVision Television in January 1998. From February 1997 to October 1997, Mr. Lerman was President and Chief Operating Officer of Kent and Spiegel Direct, a major television direct marketing and infomercial company. From November 1989 to December 1994, Mr. Lerman served as Executive Vice President of Fingerhut Companies.Merchandising Marketing; Strategic Planning and Credit Services. During this period, Mr. McCaffery also served as Vice Chairman of Signature Group. From March 1996 to March 1998, Mr. McCaffery served as Chief Executive Officer and managing partner of Marketing Advocates, a celebrity-driven product and service development company based in Los Angeles, California and Chicago, Illinois. He also served as Vice-Chairman of the Board of ValueVision from August 1995 to March 1996. Mr. McCaffery served as an infantry officer in Vietnam and was appointed as Civilian Aide to the Secretary of the Army by President George Bush in 1991. 23 24 Stuart R. Romenesko has served the Company as Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary since August 1995. Mr. Romenesko joined the Company in March 1994 as Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer. From December 1991 to March 1994, Mr. Romenesko, a Certified Public Accountant, was a Senior Manager in the Accounting and Audit Division of Shinners, Hucovski & Company, S.C. From July 1985 to November 1991, Mr. Romenesko served in a variety of capacities at Arthur Andersen LLP, an international accounting firm ("Arthur Andersen"), leaving in 1991 as an experienced manager in the firm's Audit and Business Advisory Practice. Cary Deacon joined the Company as Vice President General Marketing in September 1998 and was appointed Senior Vice President Marketing and Business Development in December 1998. From January 1998 to June 1998, Mr. Deacon served as the Chicago based General Partner of Marketing Advocates, a celebrity-driven product and service development firm based in Los Angeles, California and Chicago, Illinois. From March 1995 to January 1998, Mr. Deacon served as Senior Vice President Marketing/Special Events/ Public Relations for Macy's Department Stores in New York. From February 1993 to January 1995, Mr. Deacon served as Senior Vice President Marketing for Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated. From June 1988 to June 1991, Mr. Deacon served as President of Saffer USA, a $60 million advertising agency. Prior to Saffer USA, Mr. Deacon was an Executive Vice President with the Hudson's Bay Company, Canada's largest retailer. Mr. Deacon held various Senior positions spanning a ten year career including Vice President of Merchandising, Vice President of Marketing and Vice President of Stores. Edwin G. Pohlmann joined the Company in March 1999 as Senior Vice President, Operations. From January 1998 to February 1999, Mr. Pohlmann served as Chief Financial Officer of Fedco, Inc., a $600 million general merchandise retailer based in Los Angeles, California. In 1997, Mr. Pohlmann served as a member of the Board of Directors and as a member of the Finance Committee of Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated. From 1986 to 1997, Mr. Pohlmann served Montgomery Ward as a senior executive involved with the planning and implementation of the financial and operating strategies of the company. While at Montgomery Ward, Mr. Pohlmann served as the Executive Vice President of Store Operations, the Chief Financial Officer and a principal involved with a $3.8 billion management led buyout. David T. Quinby joinedhas served the Company as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary insince February 1997. From May 1993 to February 1997, Mr. Quinby was a senior associate at the law firm of Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand PLLP and from August 1990 to May 1993, Mr. Quinby was an associate at the law firm of Faegre & Benson, LLP, practicing at both firms primarily in the areas of general corporate, mergers and acquisitions, and securities law. From September 1983 until August 1987, Mr. Quinby served in a variety 24 25 of capacities at Arthur Andersen, leaving for law school in 1987 as an experienced senior in the firm's Audit and Business Advisory Practice. Michael L. JonesJon P. Thom joined the Company as Vice President, Television Broadcasting-- e-commerce in September 1993.1998 and became Vice President, General Merchandising Manager in December 1998. From July 1997 to September 19921998, Mr. Thom was a self employed consultant specializing in direct marketing, Internet and e-commerce companies. From October 1995 to July 1993,1997, Mr. JonesThom served as Vice President Broadcasting of Corridor Broadcast.Marketing for the Fingerhut Companies, Inc. From February 1992 to October 1990 to September 1992,1995, Mr. JonesThom served as Vice President and General Sales Manager of WDAS AM/FM in Philadelphia. Scott A. Lindquist has served asMerchandising for the Company's Vice President, Administration since November 1995. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lindquist served as County Assessor for St. Louis County, Minnesota, from May 1984 to November 1995.Fingerhut Companies, Inc. L. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION Forward-looking statementsCertain information contained herein and other materials filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as statements madeinformation included in oral presentationsstatements or other written statements made or to be made by the Company) are made pursuant tocontain various "forward looking statements" within the "Safe Harbor" provisionsmeaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 andfederal securities laws which represent management's expectations or beliefs concerning future events,events. Such "forward looking statements" include, but are not limited to, improved and growing television home shopping operations, general expansion and profitability of the Company, new initiatives and the pursuit of strategic initiatives, including statements regarding the consummation of its transactions with GE Capital and NBC, the merger betweenCompany's success in developing its e-commerce business, expected contributions from the CompanyCompany's marketing and National Media,solicitation of its customers for third-party club memberships, the outcomeexpected target date of the Time Warner litigation, anticipated operating results, revenue growth,completion and the materiality of total costs associated with the Company's Year 2000 readiness effort, capital spending requirements, potential future acquisitions and the effects of regulation and competition. There are certainThese, and other forward looking 24 25 statements made by the Company, must be evaluated in the context of a number of important factors that could causemay affect the Company's financial position, results to differ materially from those anticipated by some of the statements made herein. The factors, among others, that could cause actual results to differ materially include:operations and the ability to negotiate a restructuringbecome profitable, including: the ability of the proposed National Media Merger and successful completion of all conditions thereto, including obtaining shareholder approval,Company to continue improvements in its home shopping operations, the ability to resolve satisfactorilydevelop new initiatives or enter strategic relationships, obtaining governmental and shareholder approvals for the disputed issues inconsummation of the Time Warner Cable litigation,GE Capital and NBC transactions, the rate at which customers accept solicitations for club membership, the ability of the Company to develop successful e-commerce business, consumer spending and debt levels, interest rate fluctuations, seasonal variations in consumer purchasing activities, increases in postal, paper and outbound shipping costs, competition in the retail and direct marketing industries, continuity of relationships with or purchases from major vendors, product mix, competitive pressure on sales and pricing, the ability of the Company to manage growth and expansion, changes in the regulatory framework affecting the Company, increases in cable access fees and other costs which cannot be recovered through improved pricing and the identification and availability of potential acquisition targets at prices favorable to the Company and the matters discussed below under "-- Risk Factors.""Risk Factors". Investors are cautioned that all forward-lookingforward looking statements involve risk and uncertainty. M. RISK FACTORS In addition to the general investment risks and those factors set forth throughout this document (including those set forth under the caption "Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Information"), the following risks should be considered regarding the Company. Risks Associated With the National Media Merger. On April 8, 1998, the Company and National Media announced that each of the companies were postponing their respective special shareholder meetings while they attempt to negotiate a restructuring of the Merger. This was a result of the Company receiving preliminary notification from holders of more than 5% of its common stock that they intended to exercise their dissenters' rights with respect to the Merger. Although the Company and National Media are currently negotiating to restructure the Merger, no assurance can be given that such negotiations will be successful, or that if successful, that the Merger will be consummated. See "Business -- National Media Corporation." For a discussion of risks associated with National Media and the combined companies, see "Risk Factors" in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus of the Company and National Media dated March 16, 1998. Repayment by National Media of Demand Note. Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to loan to National Media, pursuant to the Demand Note, up to an aggregate of $10.0 million, $7.0 million of which was advanced upon signing of the Demand Note on January 5, 1998 and the remaining $3.0 million of which has subsequently been advanced. The Demand Note is payable on the earlier of January 1, 1999 and the happening of certain events. In the event the Merger is consummated, the Loan will become an intercompany payable between the Company and National Media. 25 26 However, in the event the Merger is not consummated, there can be no assurance that National Media will be able to repay the Demand Note when due. Although the Company would then have the ability to convert the Demand Note into shares of National Media, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to recover any portion of the Loan. Recent Losses. The Company experienced operating losses of approximately $1.7 million, $3.7 million, $.8 million, $2.6 million , $11.0 million and $11.0$8.6 million in fiscal 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1998,1999, respectively, and a net loss per diluted share of $.13 and $.22 in fiscal 1994 and 1995, respectively, and net income per diluted share of $.38, $.56, $.57 and $.57$.18 in fiscal 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1998,1999 respectively. Net profits of approximately $10.5 million, $17.2 million, $23.6 and $23.6$8.3 million and net profits per diluted share of $.36, $.53, $.74 and $.74$.32 in fiscal 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1998,1999, respectively, were derived from gains on sale of broadcast stations and other investments, offset by other non-operating charges in fiscal 1999, which are not generally expected to occur in the future. In addition, the Company recently restructured its relationship with Montgomery Ward regarding the Company's catalog operations. Although the Company's management anticipates that such restructuring may result in a reduction of the Company's revenues, it has not yet determined if such restructuring will have a material adverse impact on the Company's results of operations or its financial position. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve or maintain profitable operations. NBC and GE Capital Strategic Alliance. Consummation of the transactions with GE Capital and NBC is subject to shareholder approval. No assurance can be given that such approval will be obtained, and if approved, there is no assurance that the alliance will be successful. In addition the Investment Warrant will allow GE Capital to purchase a substantial number of shares of the Company's common stock which will allow it to exert substantial influence over the election of directors and the management and affairs of the Company. Accordingly, GE Capital may have sufficient voting power to determine the outcome of various matters submitted to the Company's shareholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of the Company's assets. Such control may result in decisions that are not in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders. Sale of Television Stations to Paxson. On February 27, 1998, the Company sold to Paxson Television Station KBGE (TV), Channel 33, Bellevue, Washington along with two of the Company's non-cable, low power television stations in Portland, Oregon and Indianapolis, Indiana, and a minority interest (and option to acquire the remaining interest) in an entity which has applied for a new station for aggregate proceeds of approximately $24.5$25 million. An additional $10.0 million (the "Additional Proceeds") will beis payable by Paxson to the Company if and when Television Station KBGE (TV), currently operating at reduced power from downtown Seattle, Washington, is able to relocate its antenna and increase its transmitter power to a level at or near its licensed full power.first quarter of fiscal 2000. There can be no assurance that Paxson will ever relocate the station and increase its transmitter power to a level at or near its licensed full power so that Paxson will be required to pay the Additional Proceeds. Competition. As a general merchandise retailer, the Company competes for consumer expenditures with other forms of retail businesses, including department, discount, warehouse and specialty stores, television home shopping, mail order and catalog companies and other direct sellers. The catalog and direct mail industry includes a wide variety of specialty and general merchandise retailers and is both highly fragmented and highly competitive. The Company also competes with retailers involved with the evolving convergence and development of electronic commerce as well as other retailers who sell and market their products through the highly competitive Internet medium. In addition, the Company competes with a wide variety of department, discount and specialty stores which have greater financial, distribution and marketing resources 25 26 than the Company. The home shopping industry is also highly competitive and is dominated by two companies, HSN and QVC. The Company's television home shopping programming competes directly with HSN and QVC in virtually all of the Company's markets. The Company is at a competitive disadvantage in attracting viewers due to the fact that the Company's programming is not carried full-time in many of its markets, and that the Company may have less desirable cable channels in many markets. QVC and HSN are well-established and, similar to the Company, offer home shopping programming through cable systems, owned or affiliated full- and low-power television stations and directly to satellite dish owners and, accordingly, reach a large percentage of United States television households. The television home shopping industry is also experiencing vertical integration. QVC and HSN are both affiliated with cable operators serving significant numbers of subscribers nationwide. While the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 includes provisions designed to prohibit coercion and discrimination in favor of such affiliated programmers, the FCC has decided that it will rule on the scope and effect of these provisions on a case-by-case basis. Potential Termination of Cable Time Purchase Agreements; Media Access; Related Matters. The Company's television home shopping programming is distributed primarily through purchased blocks of cable television time. Much of the Company's cable television affiliation agreements are terminable by either party upon 30 days, or less notice. The Company's television home shopping business could be materially adversely affected in the event that a significant number of its cable television affiliation agreements are terminated or not renewed on acceptable terms. 26 27 Potential Loss of Satellite Service. The Company's programming is presently distributed, in the first instance, to cable systems, full- and low-power television stations and satellite dish owners via a leased communications satellite transponder. In the future, satellite service may be interrupted due to a variety of circumstances beyond the Company's control, such as satellite transponder failure, satellite fuel depletion, governmental action, preemption by the satellite lessor and service failure. The Company does not have any agreementshas an agreement for preemptable immediate backupback-up satellite services, although itservice and believes it could arrange for such services from others.back-up service if satellite transmission is interrupted. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to make any such arrangementscontinue transmission of its programming in the event of satellite transmission failure and the Company may incur substantial additional costs in enteringto enter into new arrangements. Year 2000 Considerations. The Year 2000 issue is the result of computer programs using only the last two digits to indicate the calendar year. If uncorrected, such computer programs may be unable to interpret dates correctly beyond the year 1999, which in turn, may cause computer system failure or other computer errors disrupting operations. The Company has reviewed the implications of yearits Year 2000 compliance issues and has takenformed a Year 2000 Compliance Project team to establish and take steps designed to ensure that the Company's computerinformation systems and software applications will manage dates beyond 1999. The scope of the Company's Year 2000 readiness effort includes the review of and taking remedial action as necessary, regarding (i) information technology ("IT") components such as software and hardware; (ii) non-IT systems or embedded technology; and (iii) readiness of key third parties, including significant vendors and service providers and the electronic data interchange (EDI) with third parties. With respect to information systems and embedded technologies, management presently believes that a combination of software modification, upgrades and replacements will be necessary to mitigate the Company's Year 2000 issues. However, if such modifications are not made, or not completed on a timely basis, the Year 2000 issues could have a materially adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company expects to implement successfully the systems and programming changes necessary to be Year 2000 compliant in a timely manner. The target date for remediation of its information systems is August 31, 1999. The Company does not expect the cost of addressing its Year 2000 issues to have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity and is funding such costs with operating cash flows. Total costs are expected to be less than $500,000. In addition to internal Year 2000 remediation activities, the Company has also implemented a plan to communicate to its key suppliers, vendors and service providers the expectation that they attain Year 2000 compliance in a timely manner. While the Company expects its internal IT and non-IT systems to be Year 2000 compliant by the date specified, the Company is working on a contingency plan specifying what the Company will do if it or important third parties are not Year 2000 compliant by the 26 27 required dates. The Company expects to have such a contingency plan finalized in 1999. The Company believes that it has allocated adequate resources for this purposeto address and that planned software upgrades, which are underway andachieve Year 2000 compliance in the normal course of business, will address the Company's internal year 2000 needs. While the Company expects that efforts on the part of current employees of the Company will be required to monitor year 2000 issues,a timely manner, however, no assurances can be given that these efforts or the efforts of key third parties will be successful. The Company does not expect the cost of addressing any year 2000 issue to be a material event or uncertainty that would have a material adverse effect on future operating results or financial condition. Litigation. On December 17, 1997, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., d/b/a Time Warner Cable ("Time Warner Cable"), filed a complaint (the "Complaint") in the Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Ansonia/Milford (the "Court"), against Bridgeways Communications Corporation ("Bridgeways"), and the Company, alleging, among other things, tortious interference with contractual and business relations and breach of contract. According to the Complaint, Bridgeways and Time Warner Cable have been in dispute since 1993 regarding Bridgeways' attempt to assert "must-carry" rights with respect to television station WHAI-TV in the New York City Area of Dominant Influence. The Company purchased television station WHAI-TV from Bridgeways in 1994 and subsequently sold it in 1996. The Company and Time Warner Cable entered into a cable affiliation agreement in 1995 (the "Time Warner Cable Agreement"), pursuant to which the Company agreed not to assert "must-carry" rights with respect to television station WHAI-TV and pursuant to which the Company's programming is currently carried by Time Warner Cable in approximately 4.4 million full-time equivalent cable households out of the Company's total distribution of approximately 11.7 million full-time equivalent cable households. Time Warner Cable seeks in the Complaint to receive unspecified damages from the Company and to have the Court declare the Time Warner Cable Agreement null and void. Responsive pleadings have not yet been filed in this matter. The Company believes the Complaint is completely without merit and it intends to vigorously defend itself. However, if Time Warner Cable were to prevail under the Complaint, such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and/or costs of operations to the extent it jeopardized access to, or increased the cost of access to, these 4.4 million full-time equivalent households, which represent approximately 38% of the full-time equivalent households to which the Company currently has access. Product Liability Claims. Products sold by the Company may expose it to potential liability from claims by users of such products, subject to the Company's rights, in certain instances, to indemnification against such liability from the manufacturers of such products. The Company has instead generally required the manufacturers and/or vendors of these products to carry product liability insurance, although in certain instances where a limited quantity of products are purchased from non-U.S. vendors, the vendor may not be formally required to carry product liability insurance. Certain of such vendors, however, may in fact maintain such insurance. There can be no assurance that such parties will maintain this insurance or that this coverage will be adequate to cover all potential claims, including coverage in amounts which it believes to be adequate. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to maintain such coverage or obtain additional coverage on acceptable terms, or that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against all potential claims. Seasonability.Seasonality. The television home shopping and mail order businesses in general are somewhat seasonal, with the primary selling season occurring during the first and last quarters of the calendar year. These businesses are also sensitive to general economic conditions and business conditions affecting consumer spending. 27 28 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Company leases approximately 139,000 square feet of space in Eden Prairie, Minnesota (a suburb of Minneapolis), which includes all corporate administrative, television production, telemarketing, customer service and television warehouse operations. During fiscal 1997, the Company purchased a 262,000 square foot distribution facility on a 34 acre parcel of land in Bowling Green, Kentucky which is currently being used primarily in connection with the fulfillment operations of HomeVisions and non-jewelry merchandise for the Company's television home shopping operations. The Company also purchased approximately 34 acres of land in Eden Prairie, Minnesota during fiscal 1997 which is being held for future potential expansion and investment purposes. The Company leases approximately 96,000 square feet of office and warehouse space in Chelmsford, Massachusetts (a suburb of Boston) and approximately 1,500 square feet of office space in Tempe, Arizona in connection with the direct-mail operations of CVI and BII, respectively. Additionally, the Company rents transmitter site and studio locations used to transmit programming for KVVV (TV), serving the Houston market.market and other LPTV stations. The Company believes that its existing facilities are adequate to meet its current needs and that suitable additional or alternative space will be available as needed to accommodate expansion of operations. 28 29 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In a complaint filed December 17, 1997, (Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., d/b/a Time Warner Cable v. Bridgeways Communications Corporation and ValueVision International, Inc. (U.S. Superior Court, Judicial District of Ansonia/Milford at Milford, CT)), Time Warner Cable filed a lawsuit against Bridgeways Communications Corporation and ValueVision alleging, among other things, tortious interference with contractual and business relations and breach of contract. According to the complaint, Bridgeways and Time Warner Cable have been in a dispute since 1993 regarding Bridgeways' attempt to assert "must carry" rights with respect to television station WHAI-TV in the New York City Area of Dominant Influence.Designated Market Area. ValueVision purchased television station WHAI-TV from Bridgeways in 1994 and subsequently sold it in 1996. ValueVision and Time Warner Cable entered into a cable affiliation agreement in 1995 pursuant to which ValueVision agreed not to assert "must carry" rights with respect to television station WHAI-TV and pursuant to which ValueVision's programming is currently carried by Time Warner Cable in approximately 4.2 million full time equivalent cable households. The complaint seeks unspecified damagesOn December 23, 1998 the Company announced that it settled the lawsuit filed by Time Warner Cable. Under the terms of the settlement, ValueVision paid Time Warner Cable $7.0 million in cash which was recognized by ValueVision in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, resulting in an after tax charge of approximately $4.3 million. In settling this matter, ValueVision did not admit any wrongdoing or liability. ValueVision, however, determined to enter into this settlement to avoid the 27 28 uncertainty and for the courtcosts of litigation, as well as to declare theavoid disruption of its relationship with a key business partner providing a substantial portion of ValueVision's program distribution. ValueVision also announced that it has renewed its cable affiliation agreement betweenwith Time Warner Cable and ValueVision null and void. The Company is confident that it remains in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the cable affiliation agreementfor an additional five-year term, expiring on January 30, 2007, and that it has been inappropriately named in this lawsuit involving Time Warner Cable and Bridgeways. The Company believes that the lawsuit is completely without merit and intendshas agreed to vigorously defend itself. However, if Time Warner Cable werelaunch ValueVision's programming full-time to prevail under the Complaint, such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and/or costs of operations to the extent it jeopardized access to, or increased the cost of access to, these 4.4 million full-time equivalent households, which represent approximately 38% of the full-time equivalent households to which the Company currently has access.its Staten Island, New York cable subscribers. In addition to the litigation noted above, the Company is involved from time to time in various other claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, these claims and suits individually and in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations or consolidated financial statements. 29 30 ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted to shareholders during the fourth quarter ended January 31, 1998. 301999. 28 3129 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS MARKET INFORMATION FOR COMMON STOCK The Company's common stock symbol is "VVTV" and is traded on the Nasdaq National Market tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices of the common stock as quoted by the Nasdaq Stock Market for the periods indicated.
HIGH LOW ---- --- FISCAL 1997 First Quarter.................................. $8 9/16 $5 5/8 Second Quarter................................. 8 1/2 5 3/8 Third Quarter.................................. 6 7/16 5 3/8 Fourth Quarter................................. 5 7/8 4 5/8 FISCAL 1998 First Quarter..................................Quarter............................................. $ 4 3/4 $ 3 7/16 Second Quarter.................................Quarter............................................ 5 7/16 3 7/16 Third Quarter..................................Quarter............................................. 5 3/8 3 13/16 Fourth Quarter.................................Quarter............................................ 4 7/8 3 1/8 FISCAL 1999 First Quarter............................................. 3 31/32 3 Second Quarter............................................ 4 3/8 3 3/8 Third Quarter............................................. 5 3 1/8 Fourth Quarter............................................ 15 1/4 3 11/16
HOLDERS As of April 20, 1998,March 26, 1999, the Company had approximately 490515 shareholders of record. DIVIDENDS The Company has never declared or paid any dividends with respect to its capital stock. Pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement between the Company and GE Capital, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends in excess of 5% of the Company's market capitalization in any quarter. The Company currently expects to retain its earnings for the development and expansion of its business and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination by the Company to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company and will be dependent upon the Company's results of operations, financial condition, any contractual restrictions then existing, and other factors deemed relevant at the time by the Board of Directors. 3129 3230 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND STATISTICAL DATA) The selected financial data for the five years ended January 31, 19981999 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company. The selected financial data presented below are qualified in their entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the financial statements and notes thereto and other financial and statistical information referenced elsewhere herein including the information referenced under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, ------------------------------------------------------- 1999(A) 1998 1997(A)1997(B) 1996 1995 1994------- ---- ------- ---- ---- ----(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND STATISTICAL DATA) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Net sales...................................................sales.................................. $203,728 $217,982 $159,478 $ 88,910 $53,931 $ 37,614 Gross profit................................................profit............................... 85,971 95,174 67,363 36,641 22,454 14,583 Operating loss..............................................loss (8,569) (10,975) (2,640) (766) (3,712) (1,745) Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary item(b)...................................................taxes(c)....... 7,491 29,604 29,690 11,120 (6,104) (1,414) Net income (loss)(b)........................................(c)....................... 4,639 18,104 18,090 11,020 (6,104) (1,925) PER SHARE DATA:(C)(D) Net income (loss) per common share..........................share......... $ 0.18 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.38 $ (0.22) $ (0.13) Net income (loss) per common share -- assuming dilution.....dilution............... $ 0.18 $ 0.57 $ 0.56 $ 0.38 $ (0.22) $ (0.13) Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic.....................................................Basic.................................... 25,963 31,745 31,718 28,627 27,265 15,400 Diluted...................................................Diluted.................................. 26,267 31,888 32,342 29,309 27,265 15,400
JANUARY 31, ------------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- BALANCE SHEET DATA: Cash and short-term investments.............................investments............ $ 46,870 $ 31,866 $ 52,859 $ 46,451 $26,659 $ 48,382 Inventories, net............................................net........................... 21,101 20,427 28,109 8,889 7,833 7,226 Current assets..............................................assets............................. 98,320 79,661 101,029 65,045 39,246 57,684 Property, equipment and other assets........................ 55,103assets....... 43,450 55,618 67,057 51,666 38,258 20,014 Total assets................................................ 134,764assets............................... 141,770 135,279 168,086 116,711 77,504 77,698 Current liabilities.........................................liabilities........................ 32,684 29,590 37,724 13,519 10,124 7,533 Long-term obligations....................................... 2,906 3,708obligations...................... 675 1,036 3,734 447 578 147 Shareholders' equity........................................ 102,268 126,654equity....................... 108,411 104,653 126,628 102,745 66,802 70,018
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- OTHER DATA: Gross margin percentage.....................................percentage..................... 42.2% 43.7% 42.2% 41.2% 41.6% 38.8% Working capital.............................................capital............................. $ 65,636 $ 50,071 $ 63,305$63,305 $ 51,526 $29,122 $ 50,151 Current ratio...............................................ratio............................... 3.0 2.7 2.7 4.8 3.9 7.7 EBITDA (as defined)(b)(d)...................................(c)(e)................... $ 9,586 $ 34,465 $ 31,774$31,774 $ 13,790 $(5,553) $ (1,342) Cash Flows: Operating.................................................CASH FLOWS: Operating................................... $(18,091) $(19,445) $ (5,779)$(5,779) $ 2,304 $ (463) Investing................................... $ (3,345) Investing.................................................48,131 $ 23,065 $ 19,223$19,223 $(11,443) $(5,902) $(39,257) Financing.................................................Financing................................... $ (2,974) $(15,041) $ (4,888)$(4,889) $ 7,547 $ (235) $ 70,007
- ------------------------- (a) During fiscal 1999, the Company divested its HomeVisions catalog operations. Results of operations for the year ended January 31, 1999, includes a $2.9 million restructuring and asset impairment charge which was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 1999 in connection with the decision to divest HomeVisions. (b) Results of operations for the year ended January 31, 1997, included the operations of HomeVisions (f/k/a Montgomery Ward Direct), Beautiful Images, Inc. and Catalog Ventures, Inc. which were acquired by the Company in the second half of fiscal 1997. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of January 31, 19981999 and 1997. (b)1998. (c) Income (loss) before income taxes, and extraordinary item, net income (loss) and EBITDA (as defined) include a net pre-tax gain of $22.8 million from the sale and holdings of broadcast properties and other assets and pre-tax 30 31 charges totaling $9.5 million associated with a litigation settlement and terminated acquisition costs in fiscal 1999, a pre-tax gain of $38.9 million from the sale of broadcast properties for fiscal 1998, a $28.2$28.3 million pre-tax gain on sale of broadcast properties and other assets for fiscal 1997, an $8.5 million pre-tax gain on the sale of an investment in National Media Corporation, $2.0 million equity in earnings of affiliates in fiscal 1996 and $3.7 million of costs associated with the National Media Corporation tender offer in fiscal 1995. See Notes 2 and 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of January 31, 19981999 and 1997. (c)1998. (d) The Company computes per share data in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share."Share". Under this statement, basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share have replaced primary and fully diluted earnings (loss) per share. (d)(e) EBITDA (as defined) represents net income (loss) before interest income (expense), income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. EBITDA (as defined) is viewed by management as an important alternative measure of cash flows because it is commonly used by analysts and institutional investors in analyzing the financial performance of companies in the broadcast and television home shopping sectors. However, EBITDA (as defined) should not be construed as an alternative to operating income or to cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) and should not be construed as an indication of operating performance or as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA (as defined), as presented, may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies. 32 33 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS INTRODUCTION The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other materials filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by the Company) contain various "forward looking statements" within the meaning of federal securities laws which represent management's expectations or beliefs concerning future events,events. Such "forward looking statements" include, but are not limited to, improved and growing television home shopping operations, general expansion and profitability of the Company, new initiatives and the pursuit of strategic initiatives, including statements regarding the consummation of its transactions with GE Capital and NBC, the merger betweenCompany's success in developing its e-commerce business, expected contributions from the CompanyCompany's marketing and National Media,solicitation of its customers for third-party club memberships, the outcomeexpected target date of the Time Warner litigation, anticipated operating results, revenue growth,completion and the materiality of total costs associated with the Company's Year 2000 readiness effort, capital spending requirements, potential future acquisitions and the effects of regulation and competition. These, and other forward looking statements made by the Company, must be evaluated in the context of a number of important factors that may effectaffect the Company's financial position, and results of operations and the ability to become profitable, including: the ability to negotiate a restructuring of the proposed National Media Merger and successful completion of all conditions thereto, including obtaining shareholder approval,Company to continue improvements in its home shopping operations, the ability to resolve satisfactorilydevelop new initiatives or enter strategic relationships, obtaining governmental and shareholder approvals for the disputed issues inconsummation of the Time Warner Cable litigation,GE Capital and NBC transactions, the rate at which customers accept solicitations for club membership, the ability of the Company to develop successful e-commerce business, consumer spending and debt levels, interest rate fluctuations, seasonal variations in consumer purchasing activities, increases in postal, paper and outbound shipping costs, competition in the retail and direct marketing industries, continuity of relationships with or purchases from major vendors, product mix, competitive pressure on sales and pricing, the ability of the Company to manage growth and expansion, changes in the regulatory framework affecting the Company, increases in cable access fees and other costs which cannot be recovered through improved pricing and the identification and availability of potential acquisition targets at 31 32 prices favorable to the Company. Investors are cautioned that all forward looking statements involve risk and uncertainty. NBC AND GE CAPITAL STRATEGIC ALLIANCE On March 8, 1999 the Company entered into a strategic alliance with the National Broadcasting Company, Inc. ("NBC") and G.E. Capital Equity Investments, Inc. ("GE Capital"). Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, NBC and GE Capital have agreed to jointly acquire a 19.9% beneficial ownership interest in ValueVision (consisting of 5,339,500 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ("Preferred Stock"), and a warrant to acquire 1,450,000 shares of Common Stock (the "Distribution Warrant") under a "Distribution and Marketing Agreement") for aggregate consideration of approximately $56.0 million (or approximately $8.29 per share), representing approximately $44.0 million for the Preferred Stock and approximately $12.0 upon exercise of the Distribution Warrant. In addition, the Company will issue NBC and GE Capital a warrant to increase their potential aggregate equity stake to 39.9% (the "Investment Warrant"), subject to approval of ValueVision's shareholders. NBC will also have the exclusive right to negotiate on behalf of ValueVision for the distribution of its television home shopping service. The Federal Trade Commission notified the Company on April 5, 1999 that it had granted the Company early termination with respect to the 30 day waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"). In light of this development, the Company expects that the closing of the sale of the 3,739,500 shares of Preferred Stock not subject to shareholder approval, the Investment Warrant and the Distribution Warrant will take place during the week of April 12, 1999. Closing on the sale of the remaining shares of Preferred Stock and exercisability of the Investment Warrant is subject to Shareholder Approval. See Item 1 -- Business Section under "Strategic Relationships" for a detailed discussion of the strategic alliance. TIME WARNER CABLE LITIGATION SETTLEMENT On December 23, 1998 the Company announced that it settled the lawsuit which was filed by Time Warner Cable against the Company and Bridgeways Communications Corporation in 1997. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, tortious interference with contractual and business relations and breach of contract. Under the terms of the settlement, ValueVision paid Time Warner Cable $7.0 million in cash which was recognized by ValueVision in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, resulting in an after tax charge of approximately $4.3 million. In settling this matter, ValueVision did not admit any wrongdoing or liability. ValueVision, however, determined to enter into this settlement to avoid the uncertainty and costs of litigation, as well as to avoid disruption of its relationship with a key business partner providing a substantial portion of ValueVision's program distribution. ValueVision also announced that it has renewed its cable affiliation agreement with Time Warner Cable for an additional five-year term, expiring in January 30, 2007, and that Time Warner Cable has agreed to launch ValueVision's programming full-time to its Staten Island, New York cable subscribers. WRITE-DOWN OF INVESTMENT IN CML GROUP, INC. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, the Company wrote off its investment in CML Group, Inc. ("CML") in fiscal 1999. The decline in the investment's fair value was judged by management to be other than temporary following CML's announcement that its NordicTrack subsidiary had filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The write-off totaled approximately $6,113,000. Subsequently, CML also filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS In the third quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company approved a restructuring plan and the effective divestiture of its HomeVisions catalog operations. The decision to restructure and divest HomeVisions was made primarily as a result of the continuing operating losses and deteriorating financial performance over the past year of the catalog's operations since Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated's announcement of its bankruptcy filing in the summer of 1997. Operating losses for HomeVisions further increased as a result of the subsequent termination of HomeVisions' right to use the Montgomery Ward private label credit card in 32 33 March 1998. As a result of the decision to divest HomeVisions, the Company mailed its last HomeVisions catalog in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 and effectively wound down the catalog operation as of January 31, 1999. In connection with the restructuring plan and divestiture of HomeVisions, the Company recorded a $2,950,000 restructuring and asset impairment charge in the third quarter ended October 31, 1998. The restructuring charge included severance costs and the write-down of certain assets including inventory, property and equipment, capitalized software and capitalized catalog costs that were deemed impaired as a direct result of the decision to divest HomeVisions. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. In connection with the decision to divest HomeVisions, the Company has entered into an agreement to license and sell the exclusive marketing rights to the "HomeVisions" name and related customer list database to Direct Marketing Services, Inc. ("DMSI"), a direct-mail marketer and catalog distributor headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The Company recorded a $1,443,000 gain in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 related to the sale of these assets. NATIONAL MEDIA CORPORATION PROPOSED MERGER On January 5, 1998, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), by and among the Company, National Media Corporation ("National Media") and Quantum Direct Corporation, formerlyFormerly known as V-L Holdings Corp. ("Quantum Direct"), a newly-formed Delaware corporation. National Media is a publicly-held direct marketer of consumer products through the use of direct response transactional television programming, known as infomercials, and currently makes its programming available to more than 370 million television households in more than 70 countries worldwide. If the mergers (the "Mergers") contemplated by the Merger Agreement were to be consummated, the Company and National Media would have become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Quantum Direct, with each outstanding share of the Company's common stock being converted into 1.19 shares of common stock in Quantum Direct and each outstanding share of common stock of National Media, being converted into one share of common stock in Quantum Direct. Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to loan to National Media, pursuant to a Demand Promissory Note, up to an aggregate of $10.0 million, $7.0 million of which was advanced upon signing of the Demand Note on January 5, 1998 and the remaining $3.0 million of which has subsequently been advanced. The Loan proceeds have been used by National Media for various purposes, including the funding of accounts receivable, inventory and media purchases. The Loan bears interest at prime rate plus 1.5% per annum and is due on the earlier of January 1, 1999 or upon termination of the Merger Agreement in certain circumstances. In the event National Media is unable to repay the Loan when due, ValueVision may elect to receive payment in shares of National Media's common stock at the then present market value. In consideration for providing the Loan, National Media issued to ValueVision warrants to 33 34 acquire 250,000 shares of National Media's common stock with an exercise price per share equal to $2.74. The warrants are exercisable until the earlier of (i) January 5, 2003 and (ii) the occurrence of one of the following termination events: (x) the consummation of the Merger or (y) the termination by National Media of the Merger Agreement, if such termination results from a breach of a covenant by ValueVision or in the event ValueVision's shareholders do not approve the Merger Agreement; provided, however, that if, within 75 days after the termination event described in clause (y) above, National Media has not repaid the Loan in full or if during such 75 days, National Media defaults under its obligations pursuant to the Loan, no termination event will be deemed to have occurred and the warrants shall remain exercisable. Consummation of the Mergers is subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of a number of conditions, including, but not limited to: (i) approval by holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of National Media's common stock and the Company's common stock; (ii) redemption of National Media's Series C Preferred Stock; (iii) the receipt of certain regulatory and other approvals, including those from the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communication Commission; and (iv) not more than 5% of the holders of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common stock shall have made demands and given the notices required under Minnesota law to assert dissenters' appraisal rights. On April 8, 1998, it was announced that the Company received preliminary notification from holders of more thanthen 5% of the Company's common stock that they intended to exercise their dissenter's rights with respect to the proposed merger of the Company and National Media. TheMedia and the Company also reported that it had advised National Media that it doesdid not intend to waive the Merger Agreement condition to closing requiring that holders of not more than 5% of the shares of the Company common stock have demanded their dissenter's rights. On June 2, 1998, the Company announced that attempts to renegotiate new, mutually acceptable terms and conditions regarding a transaction with National Media were unsuccessful and the Merger Agreement was terminated. The Company had incurred approximately $2,350,000 of acquisition related costs and National Media had special meetings of their shareholders scheduled on April 14, 1998 to vote on the Mergers. In light of the receipt of the dissenters' notice, the companies mutually agreed to postpone their respective shareholder meetings while the companies attempt to negotiate a restructuring of the Mergers that is acceptable to each of the companies andwrote off these amounts in the best interestsecond quarter of their shareholders. As of the date hereof, National Media and the Company are still attempting to negotiate a restructuring of the Mergers and have not reschedule their respective special meetings. There can be no assurance that the companies will be able to successfully negotiate such a restructuring, or if negotiated, that such Mergers will be consummated.fiscal 1999. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS MONTGOMERY WARD DIRECT CATALOG OPERATIONS Effective July 27, 1996, the Company acquired, through ValueVision Direct Marketing Company, Inc. ("VVDM"), substantially all of the assets and assumed certain obligations of Montgomery Ward Direct, L.P. ("MWD"), a four year old catalog business, by issuing 1,484,993 vested warrants with an exercise price of $.01 per share, to Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated ("Montgomery Ward") as full consideration for the acquisition of approximately $4.0 million in net assets of MWD. The Company's acquisition of MWD was for an aggregate purchase price of $8,497,000, which included approximately $4.0 million in net assets, including acquired cash of $5,764,000. Acquisition related costs approximated $144,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the net assets of MWD were recorded at their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired was $4,531,000, had been recorded as goodwill and other intangible assets and was being amortized on a straight-line basis over 5-12 years. As discussed in Notes 2 and 3 ofthe Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of January 31, 1998 and 1997, intangible assets recorded in connection with this acquisition were reduced to zero in fiscal 1998 in connection with the restructuring transaction with Montgomery Ward. The operating results of MWD have been included in the fiscal 1997 consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition. Unaudited pro forma consolidated net sales of the Company for the yearsyear ended January 31, 1997, and 1996, as if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the respective periods were $194,284,000 and $240,850,000 respectively.year was $194,284,000. Unaudited pro forma net income was $17,151,000, or $.52 per diluted share, in fiscal 1997 and $4,341,000, or $.14 per diluted share, in fiscal 1996.1997. Such pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of what the actual 3433 3534 consolidated results of operations would have been had the acquisition been effective at the beginning of the respective periods.fiscal 1997. In fiscal 1998, the Company changed the name of the MWD catalog to HomeVisions. See additional discussion above regarding the fiscal 1999 divestiture of the HomeVisions operations. BEAUTIFUL IMAGES, INC. On October 22, 1996, the Company, through VVDM, acquired all of the outstanding shares of Beautiful Images, Inc. ("BII"), a manufacturer and direct marketer of women's foundation undergarments and other women's apparel. The Company paid $4,253,000 in cash, which included acquired cash of $423,000, $500,000 relating to a non-compete agreement and acquisition costs of approximately $75,000, and assumed certain obligations totaling $109,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets purchased and the liabilities assumed based upon estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $3,310,000, of which $2,810,000 has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years and $500,000 assigned to the non-compete agreement, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the 6 year6-year term of the agreement. The operating results of BII have been included in the fiscal 1997 consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects were not significant. CATALOG VENTURES, INC. Effective November 1, 1996, the Company, through VVDM, acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain obligations of Catalog Ventures, Inc. and Mitchell & Webb, Inc. (collectively "CVI"), two direct marketing companies which together publish five consumer specialty catalogs. The Company paid $7,369,000 in cash which included acquired cash of $1,465,000 and acquisition costs of approximately $100,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $1,953,000, and has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. The operating results of CVI have been included in the fiscal 1997 consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects were not significant. ACQUISITION OF BROADCAST STATIONS During the first quarter of fiscal 1995, the Company completed the acquisitions of three full power television broadcast stations serving the Washington, D.C. ("WVVI"); Houston, Texas ("KVVV"); and Cleveland --- Akron, Ohio ("WAKC") Areas of Dominant Influence ("ADI"). On December 28, 1994 the Company completed the acquisition of one full power television broadcast station serving part of the New York City ADI and licensed to Bridgeport, Connecticut ("WHAI"). The aggregate purchase price for the four stations was approximately $22.4 million in cash, Company common stock and non-compete obligations. The acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the net assets of the four stations were recorded at their estimated fair values at the time of acquisition, as determined by independent appraisals. On March 15, 1996, the Company completed the acquisition of independent television station KBGE (TV), Channel 33, serving the Seattle-Tacoma, Washington market, for approximately $4.6 million including the assumption of certain debt obligations and acquisition related costs. This acquisition was completed in accordance with the terms of a five-year programming affiliation and financing agreement with the station which was signed on July 21, 1995. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company provided financing of up to $1,450,000 related to a working capital loan for channel operations. On April 11, 1996, the Company completed a second closing with respect to its acquisition of independent television station WVVI whereby the Company paid $800,000 to the former owner of WVVI as a final payment in exchange for not having to pay $1,600,000 in the event the "must carry" provisions of the 34 35 Cable Act are upheld by a final decision. The Company had previously paid $4,050,000 to National Capital 35 36 Christian Broadcasting, WVVI=sWVVI's former owners, at an initial closing on March 28, 1994. The $800,000 additional payment had been classified as excess purchase price and was amortized over 25 years on a straight-line basis. In addition, the Company received certain studio and production equipment from the former owner of WVVI, in lieu of a cash payment, for the balance outstanding under a secured convertible debenture in the face amount of $450,000. On March 31, 1997, the United States Supreme Court upheld the "must carry" provisions of the 1992 Cable Act and as a result, the Company paid an additional $1,600,000 for the Houston, Texas station upon a second closing. The additional payment has been classified as unallocated excess purchase price and is being amortized over 25 years on a straight-line basis. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects were not significant. The Company views and treats the acquisition of its television broadcast stations as a "purchase of assets" rather than as a purchase of a stand alone operating business unit. This treatment is due to the fact that planned revenues of acquired television broadcast stations do not constitute either a separate business of ValueVision or represent a significant portion of the Company=sCompany's operating businesses. SALE OF BROADCAST STATIONS On February 28, 1996, the Company completed the sale of two television stations to Paxson Communications Corporation ("Paxson") for $40.0 million in cash plus the assumption of certain obligations. The stations sold were ABC affiliate WAKC (TV), Channel 23, licensed to Akron, Ohio, and independent station WHAI (TV), Channel 43, licensed to Bridgeport, Connecticut. WAKC (TV) was acquired by the Company in April 1994 for approximately $6.0 million and WHAI (TV) was acquired by the Company in December 1994 for approximately $7.3 million. The pre-tax gain recorded on the sale of these two television stations was approximately $27 million and was recognized in the first fiscal quarter ended April 30, 1996. On July 31, 1997, the Company completed the sale of its television broadcast station WVVI (TV), which serves the Washington, D.C. market, to Paxson for approximately $30 million in cash and the receipt of 1,197,892 shares of Paxson common stock valued at $11.92 per share as determined pursuant to an independent financial appraisal. Under the terms of the agreement, Paxson paid the Company $20 million in cash upon closing and was required to pay an additional $10 million to the Company as a result of the United States Supreme Court upholding the "must carry" provision of the 1992 Cable Act. WVVI (TV) was acquired by the Company in March 1994 for $4,850,000. The pre-tax gain recorded on the sale of the television station was $38.9 million and was recognized in the second fiscal quarter ended July 31, 1997. On February 27, 1998, the Company completed the sale of its television broadcast station, KBGE-TV Channel 33, which serves the Seattle, Washington market along with two of the Company=sCompany's non-cable, low-power stations in Portland, Oregon and Indianapolis, Indiana and a minority interest in an entity which had applied for a new full-power station to Paxson for a total of approximately $35 million in cash. Under the terms of the agreement, Paxson paid the Company approximately $25 million upon closing and the remaining $10 million is to be paid when KBGE, which is currently operating at reduced power from downtown Seattle, is able to relocate its antenna and increase its transmitter power to a level at or near its licensed full power.payable by the first quarter of fiscal 2000. The Company will retain and continue to serve the Seattle market via its recently-launched low-power station K58DP-TV, which transmits from downtown Seattle. The pre-tax gain to be recorded on the first installment with respect to the sale of this television station is expected to bewas approximately $19.8 million and will bewas recognized in the financial statements in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Management believes that sales of its television stations will not have a significant impact on the ongoing operations of the Company. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Results of operations for the year ended January 31, 1997 include the direct-mail operations of HomeVisions effective July 27, 1996, BII effective October 31, 1996 and CVI effective November 1, 1996, which were acquired by the Company in fiscal 1997.1996. 35 36 37 The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statement of operations data expressed as a percentage of net sales.
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- NET SALES...................................... 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % ====== ====== ======SALES........................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% ===== ===== ===== GROSS MARGIN................................... 43.7 % 42.2 % 41.2 % ------ ------ ------MARGIN........................................ 42.2% 43.7% 42.2% ----- ----- ----- OPERATING EXPENSES: Distribution and selling....................... 40.8 % 35.6 % 31.7 %selling............................ 36.6% 40.8% 35.6% General and administrative..................... 4.7 % 4.5 % 5.0 %administrative.......................... 5.9% 4.7% 4.5% Depreciation and amortization.................. 3.2 % 3.8 % 5.4 % ------ ------ ------amortization....................... 2.5% 3.2% 3.8% Restructuring and impairment of assets.............. 1.4% -- -- ----- ----- ----- Total operating expenses..................... 48.7 % 43.9 % 42.1 % ------ ------ ------expenses....................... 46.4% 48.7% 43.9% ----- ----- ----- OPERATING LOSS:................................LOSS...................................... (4.2)% (5.0)% (1.7)% (.9)% Other income (expense), net.................... 18.6 % 20.3 % 13.4 % ------ ------ ------net......................... 7.9% 18.6% 20.3% ----- ----- ----- INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES..................... 13.6 % 18.6 % 12.5 %TAXES.......................... 3.7% 13.6% 18.6% Income taxes...................................taxes........................................ (1.4)% (5.3)% (7.3)% (.1)% ------ ------ ----------- ----- ----- NET INCOME..................................... 8.3 % 11.3 % 12.4 % ====== ====== ======INCOME.......................................... 2.3% 8.3% 11.3% ===== ===== =====
NET SALES Net sales for the year ended January 31, 19981999 (fiscal 1998)1999), were $217,982,000$203,728,000 compared to $159,478,000$217,982,000 for the year ended January 31, 19971998 (fiscal 1997)1998), a 36.7% increase.7% decrease. The majority of the increasedecrease in net sales is attributeddirectly attributable to revenues associated withthe decline in catalog sales resulting from the downsizing and eventual divestiture of the Company's acquisitionHomeVisions (formerly known as Montgomery Ward Direct) direct-mail operations following the November 1997 restructuring of the direct marketing businesses in the second half of fiscal 1997.Company's operating agreements with Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated ("Montgomery Ward"). Sales attributed to direct marketing operations totaled $111,411,000$55,530,000 or 51.1%27% of total net sales for the year ended January 31, 19981999 and totaled $60,059,000$111,411,000 or 37.7%51% of total net sales for the year ended January 31, 1997.1998. Sales attributed to the Company's television home shopping programming increased 39% to $148,198,000 for the year ended January 31, 1999 from $106,571,000 for the year ended January 31, 1998. The increase in home shopping net sales is a result of a strengthened merchandising effort under the leadership of ValueVision -- TV's new general management team. The improvement in television home shopping sales is due, in part, to various sales initiatives which emphasized, among other things, the increased use of the Company's ValuePay installment payment program and shipping and handling promotions. The increase in television home shopping net sales is also attributable to the increase in full-time equivalent ("FTE") cable homes able to receive the Company's television home shopping programming, which increased approximately 300,0003.2 million or 2.6%27% from 11.4 million at January 31, 1997 to 11.7 million at January 31, 1998. During1998 to 14.9 million at January 31, 1999. The average number of FTE's was 12.6 million for fiscal 1999 and 11.9 million for fiscal 1998, the Company added approximately 900,000 full-time cable homes, an 11.7%a 6% increase. In addition to new full-time cable homes, television home shopping sales increased due to the continued addition of new customers from households already receiving the Company's television home shopping programming and an increase in repeat sales to existing customers. The increase in repeat sales to existing customers experienced in fiscal 19981999 was due, in part, to the effects of continued testing of certain merchandising and programming strategies in the second half of fiscal 1998.strategies. The Company intends to continue to test and change its merchandising and programming strategies with the intent of improving its television home shopping sales results. However, while the Company is optimistic that results will continue to improve, there can be no assurance that such changes in strategy will achieve the intended results. As a result of the increased number of households able to receive the Company's programming and continued growth in direct mail-ordertelevision home shopping operations, the Company anticipates that net sales and operating expenses will continue to increase in fiscal 1999.2000. Net sales for the year ended January 31, 1997,1998, were $159,478,000$217,982,000 compared to fiscal 19961997 net sales of $88,910,000,$159,478,000, a 79.4%37% increase. The majority of the increase in net sales was primarily attributed to revenues associated 36 37 with the Company's acquisition of the direct marketing businesses which were acquired in the second half of fiscal 1997. Sales attributed to direct marketing operations totaled $111,411,000 or 51% of total net sales for the year ended January 31, 1998 and totaled $60,059,000 or 37.7%38% of total net sales for the year ended January 31, 1997. The increase in net sales was also attributedattributable to an increase in total number of full-time and FTE cable homes able to receive the Company's television home shopping programming, which increased from 7.2 million (10.5 million FTEs) at January 31, 1996 to 7.7 million (11.4 million FTEs)FTE's) at January 31, 1997 to 8.6 million (11.7 million FTE's) at January 31, 1998, a 6.9%12% increase in full-time cable homes and an 8.6%a 3% increase in FTEs.FTE's. The average number of FTE's was 11.9 million for fiscal 1998 and 10.8 million for fiscal 1997, a 10% increase. The Company records a reserve as a reduction of gross sales for anticipated product returns at each month-end based upon historical product return experience. The return rates for fiscal years 1999, 1998 1997 and 19961997 were approximately 19.4%24%, 21.9%19% and 26.8%22%, respectively. The lower return ratesrate in fiscal 1998 and fiscal 37 38 1997 arewas directly attributable to the effect of the Company's recentlyHomeVisions catalog business which was acquired direct marketing businessesin the second half of fiscal 1997 and significantly downsized in fiscal 1999. The HomeVisions operations, which represented 34% of total sales in fiscal 1998 and only 9% of total sales in fiscal 1999, typically experienceexperienced lower average return rates.rates than the television operations. The fiscal 19981999 return rate for the Company'scompany's television home shopping operations was 26.6%28%, compared to 27.8%27% in fiscal 19971998 and 26.8%28% in fiscal 1996.1997. The return rate for the television home shopping operations is slightly higher than the historic average industry return rate of 24% to 26% and is attributable in part to the Company's Video Shopping Cart service, which allows for multiple items to be shipped in one order for a single shipping and handling fee. The slightly higher return rate is also attributed to the average unit selling price points for the Company of approximately $83$93 in fiscal 19981999 ($8583 in fiscal 1997)1998) as compared to the historic industry average selling price per unit of approximately $40 to $50. The Company is continuing to manage return rates and is adjusting average selling price points and product mix in an effort to reduce the overall return rate related to its home shopping business. The returns ratereturn rates for the Company's direct marketing operations were 11.2%11%, 11% and 9.8%10% in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and the Company believes that this return rate is comparable to industry averages. GROSS PROFIT Gross profits for fiscal 1999 and 1998 were $85,971,000 and $95,174,000, respectively, a decrease of $9,203,000 or 10%. Gross margins for fiscal 1999 were 42.2% compared to 43.7% for fiscal 1998. The principal reason for the decrease in gross profits was the decreased sales volume resulting from the downsizing and eventual divestiture of the HomeVisions catalog operations. Television home shopping gross margins for fiscal 1999 and 1998 were 38.0% and 39.8%, respectively. Gross margins for the Company's direct mail operations were 53.5% and 47.3% for the same respective periods. Television home shopping gross margin percentages decreased from 1998 to 1999 as a result of changes in merchandise mix and on-air promotions to enhance net gross margin contributions. Specifically, television home shopping gross margins decreased from prior year primarily as a result of a decrease in gross margin percentages in the jewelry, giftware and houseware product categories offset by an increase in the sales volume of the higher margin jewelry category. In addition, during fiscal 1999, the Company promoted the movement of a significant amount of aging inventory which further reduced television home shopping margins. During fiscal 1999, the Company attempted to balance its merchandise mix between jewelry and non-jewelry items as compared to fiscal 1998 in order to increase television home shopping sales while at the same time maintain margins and increase inventory turns. As part of a shift in merchandise mix, the Company devoted additional program air time to its jewelry merchandise during fiscal 1999 over fiscal 1998. Jewelry products accounted for approximately 72% of air time during fiscal 1999, compared with 61% for fiscal 1998. Gross margins for the Company's direct mail-order operations increased primarily as a result of the decrease in HomeVisions sales due to the downsizing and divestiture of the HomeVisions catalog operations, which has considerably lower margins than CVI or BII and as a result of the exclusion of two lower margin catalog titles from the fiscal 1999 summer mailing. Gross profits for fiscal 1998 and 1997 were $95,174,000 and $67,363,000, respectively, an increase of $27,811,000 or 41.3%41%. Gross margins for fiscal 1998 were 43.7% compared to 42.2% for fiscal 1997. The principal reason for the increase in gross profits was increased sales volume primarily as a result of the direct mail operations included in the fiscal 1998 results.results for the full year. Television home shopping gross margins for fiscal 1998 and 1997 were 39.9%39.8% and 40.1%, respectively. Gross margins for the Company's direct mail 37 38 operations were 47.3%47.3 % and 45.9% for the same respective periods. Television home shopping gross margins between comparable periods remained consistent, primarily as a result of an increase in gross margin percentages in the jewelry and houseware product categories and a greater proportion of higher margin non-jewelrynon- jewelry products such as houseware products, offset by a decline in volume of higher margin jewelry products. During fiscal 1998, the Company continued to broaden its merchandise mix as compared to the same period last year by expanding the range and quantity of non-jewelry merchandise. As part of the ongoing shift in merchandise mix, the Company continued to devote increasing program air time to non-jewelry merchandise during the past fiscal year. Jewelry products accounted for 61% of air time during fiscal 1998, compared with 67% for fiscal 1997. Gross margins for the Company's direct mail operations increased primarily due to the acquisition of CVI which generally has higher margins and was included in prior year's results of operations only in the fourth quarter. In addition, there was also a slight change in merchandise mix to higher margin home accessories (furniture, giftware and wall decor) which also contributed to the improvement in direct-mail margins. Gross profits for fiscal 1997 and 1996 were $67,363,000 and $36,641,000, respectively, which represented an increase of $30,722,000 or 83.8%. Gross margins for the respective years were 42.2% and 41.2%. The increase in gross profit was a direct result of increased sales volume primarily due to the 1997 direct mail acquisitions. Television home shopping gross margins for fiscal 1997 were 40.1% and gross margins on the Company's direct mail operations were 45.9%. Television home shopping gross margins declined slightly as a result of increased sales of traditionally lower margin electronic merchandising categories, offset partially by an increase in gross margin percentages in jewelry, giftware and apparel product categories and by the mix of a greater proportion of higher margin non-jewelry products, such as housewares and seasonal products. OPERATING EXPENSES Total operating expenses were $94,540,000, $106,149,000 $70,003,000 and $37,408,000$70,003,000 for the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, respectively, representing increasesa decrease of $11,609,000 or 11% from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999, and an increase of $36,146,000 or 51.6%52% from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998. For fiscal 1999, total operating expenses include a $2,950,000 one-time restructuring and asset impairment charge recorded as a result of the Company's decision to divest its HomeVisions catalog operations. The restructuring charge included severance costs and the write-down of certain assets, including inventory, property and equipment, capitalized software and catalog costs that were deemed impaired as a direct result of the decision to divest HomeVisions. Distribution and selling expenses for fiscal 1999 decreased $14,369,000 or 16% to $74,649,000 or 37% of net sales compared to $89,018,000 or 41% of net sales in fiscal 1998. The decrease in distribution and selling expense from prior year was a direct result of the downsizing of the HomeVisions catalog operations, offset by increases in net cable access fees due to an increase in the average rate per full-time equivalent cable home, increased marketing and advertising fees as a result of absorbing additional advertising costs which were previously resold to Montgomery Ward, costs associated with increased staff levels, recruitment and labor rates due to increases in television home shopping sales volumes. Distribution and selling expense for fiscal 1999 decreased as a percentage of net sales over prior year primarily due to the Company's focus on cost efficiencies, the increase in television home shopping net sales over prior year and as a result of additional costs incurred by the Company and included in fiscal 1998 in connection with the conversion, integration and $32,595,000 or 87.1% from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997.start-up of the Company's acquired direct-mail operations and warehouse facility. Distribution and selling expenses for fiscal 1998 increased $32,199,000$32,198,000 or 56.7%57% to $89,018,000 or 40.8%41% of net sales compared to $56,819,000$56,820,000 or 35.6%36% of net sales infor fiscal 1997. Distribution and selling costs increased primarily as a result of additional distribution and selling expenses associated with the Company's direct marketing businesses, which were acquired in the second half of fiscal 1997, increases in cable access fees resulting from the growth in the number of cable homes receiving the Company's television home shopping programming, additional personnel costs associated with increased staffing levels and labor rates and additional costs associated with handling increased sales volume. Distribution and selling expenses for fiscal 38 39 1998 increased as a percentage of net sales over prior year primarily as a result of increases in cable access fees on a full-time equivalent basis with respect to the Company's television home shopping operations, a softening of sales on front-end acquisition and sale/clearance catalogs, sales softening on books mailed to customers in the Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated ("Montgomery Ward" or "MW") credit file as a direct result of the MW bankruptcy announcement in July 1997, increased mail promotion costs, the experience of slightly higher than historical return rates with respect to the Company's direct-mail operations and additional unusual costs incurred by the Company during the first quarter of fiscal 1998 in connection with the conversion and integration of the Company's direct-mail operations and start-up costs associated with the Company's new fulfillment and warehouse facility located in Bowling Green, Kentucky. DistributionGeneral and sellingadministrative expenses for fiscal 19971999 increased $28,641,000$1,788,000 or 101.6%,18% to $56,819,000$11,942,000 or 35.6%6% of net sales compared to $28,178,000$10,154,000 or 31.7%5% of net sales in fiscal 1996,1998. General and administrative costs increased primarily due to additional distribution and selling expenses associated with the Company's acquired direct marketing businesses, increases in cable access fees as a result of the growth in the number of cable homes, additional personnel costs associated with increased staffing levelsadministrative personnel and additionalsalaries, particularly the hiring of several senior level executives, increased rent and legal costs associated with handlingsettling certain merchandising litigation. General and administrative costs increased as a percentage of net sales volumes.from 38 39 prior year as a result of increased general and administrative costs and the decrease in net sales from year to year. General and administrative expenses for fiscal 1998 increased $2,966,000$2,967,000 or 41.3%41% to $10,154,000 or 4.7%5% of net sales compared to $7,187,000 or 4.5%5% of net sales in fiscal 1997. General and administrative costs increased as a result of increased costs associated with the Company's direct-mail operations which were acquired in the second half of fiscal 1997, increased personnel in support of expanded operations and additional legal costs incurred relative to clarification of certain cable regulations. General and administrative costs remained relatively consistent between fiscal years as a percentage of net sales as the Company continues to leverage its existing operating infrastructure. Generalbetween fiscal 1998 and administrative expenses for fiscal 1997 increased $2,765,000 or 62.5% to $7,187,000 or 4.5% of net sales compared to $4,422,000 or 5.0% of net sales in fiscal 1996. General and administrative costs increased primarily as a direct result of increased costs associated with the Company's acquired direct-mail operations, increased personnel costs and additional legal costs incurred relative to cable regulations.1997. Depreciation and amortization costs were $6,978,000,$4,999,000, $6,977,000 and $5,996,000 and $4,808,000 for the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, respectively, representing a decrease of $1,978,000 or 28% from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999 and an increase of $981,000 or 16.4%16% from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 and $1,189,000 or 24.7% from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997.1998. Depreciation and amortization costs as a percentage of net sales were 3.2%2% in fiscal 1999, 3% in fiscal 1998 3.8%and 4% in fiscal 1997 and 5.4% in fiscal 1996.1997. The dollar increasedecrease from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 1999 is primarily due to a reduction in amortization expense of approximately $1,363,000 relating to intangible assets reduced in connection with the November 1997 amended Montgomery Ward operating and license agreement. In addition, depreciation and amortization expense decreased from fiscal 1998 as a result of the Company's sale of its Seattle, Washington television station (KBGE-TV, Channel 33) in February 1998. Depreciation and amortization expense increased from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 primarily due to additional depreciation and amortization of approximately $989,000 relating to assets associated with the Company's acquired direct-mail operations, depreciation on property and equipment additions, particularly with respect to the Company's fulfillment facility, offset by a reduction in amortization associated with the Montgomery Ward operating agreement and licenses entered into in August 1995 and amended in November 1997. Depreciation and amortization expense increased from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997 primarily due to additional amortization expense of $690,000 relating to the Montgomery Ward operating agreement and licenses and depreciation and amortization of $640,000 relating to direct-mail acquisition assets offset by reductions associated with the sale of WAKC and WHAI in February 1996. OPERATING LOSS The operating loss was $8,569,000, $10,975,000 $2,640,000 and $766,000$2,640,000 for the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The fiscal 1999 operating loss includes a one-time restructuring and 1996, respectively.asset impairment charge of $2,950,000 recorded in the third quarter relating to the Company's decision to divest its HomeVisions catalog operations. Excluding the one-time HomeVisions restructuring charge, the operating loss was $5,619,000 for the year ended January 31, 1999, an improvement of $5,356,000 or 49% over fiscal 1998. The improvement in the operating loss resulted primarily from the overall improvement in the Company's television home shopping business, decreases in distribution and selling costs over prior year due to the downsizing of the HomeVisions catalog operations and because the first half of fiscal 1998 included certain unusual costs incurred by the Company in connection with the conversion and integration of the Company's fulfillment and warehouse facility. Also contributing to the operating loss improvement in fiscal 1999 was a reduction in amortization expense compared to fiscal 1998 relating primarily to the November 1997 amended Montgomery Ward operating and license agreement. These operating improvements were offset, in part, by increased general and administrative costs, decreased sales volumes in the Company's direct mail operations and a corresponding decrease in gross profits. The increase in the operating loss forfrom fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 resulted primarily from the following: increases in distribution and selling costs over the prior year largely due to increases in front-end cable access fees associated with new cable distribution,distribution; expansion of operations,operations; lower than anticipated response rates from catalog solicitations and television home-shoppinghome shopping offerings as a result of the Montgomery Ward bankruptcy notification in July 1997,1997; higher than historical return rates on catalog operationsoperations; and certain unusual costs incurred by the Company in the first quarterhalf of fiscal 1998 in connection with the conversion and integration of the Company's acquired direct-mail operations, as well as start-up costs associated with the Company's new fulfillment and warehouse facility located in Bowling Green, Kentucky.facility. These increases were offset by increased sales volume, margins and a corresponding increase in gross profits. The increase in the operating 39 40 loss for fiscal 1997 resulted primarily from decreases in gross margin percentages relating to the Company's television home shopping business over fiscal 1996, as well as increases in distribution and selling costs, general and administrative and depreciation and amortization expenses due to expanded operations. These increases were offset by increased sales volume and a corresponding increase in gross profits. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) Total other income was $16,060,000 in fiscal 1999, $40,579,000 in fiscal 1998 and $32,330,000 in fiscal 19971997. Total other income for fiscal 1999 included the following: a pre-tax gain of $19,750,000 from the sale of television station KBGE-TV Channel 33 in Seattle, Washington along with two low power television stations and $11,886,000a minority interest in fiscal 1996.an entity which had applied for a new full power station; gains on the sale of property 39 40 and investments of $8,102,000; unrealized gains of $1,350,000 recognized on equity investments classified as trading securities; and interest income of $2,904,000. These gains were offset by the following charges: a $7,100,000 charge related to the litigation settlement with Time Warner Cable; the $6,113,000 write-down of the Company's investment in CML Group, Inc. following their announcement of bankruptcy; the write-off of $2,350,000 of acquisition related costs associated with the terminated merger with National Media Corporation; and equity in losses of affiliates of $323,000. Total other income for fiscal 1998 resulted primarily from a $38,850,000 gain recorded on the sale of television station WVVI (TV), Channel 66, in July 1997, gains of $215,000 recorded from sales of other investments and interest income of $2,116,000 earned on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.$2,116,000. These gains were offset by equity in losses of affiliates of $431,000 recorded for the year. The equity in losses of affiliates represents amounts lost on a 13% ownership interest in a limited partnership accounted for under the equity method of accounting.fiscal 1998. Interest income decreased $1,796,000increased $788,000 from fiscal 19971998 due to decreasesincreases in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments from fiscal 19971998 to fiscal 1998.1999. Total other income for the year ended January 31, 1997 resulted primarily from a $27,050,000 gain recorded on the sale of television stations WAKC and WHAI in February 1996, gains of $809,000 recorded from sales of other investments, equity in earnings of affiliates of $419,000, gains of $808,000 recorded from sales of other investments and interest income of $3,912,000 earned on cash$3,912,000. NET INCOME Net income was $4,639,000 or $.18 per basic and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Total otherdiluted share for the year ended January 31, 1999. Net income for the year ended January 31, 1996 resulted primarily1999 includes the following pretax items: a gain of $19,750,000 from an $8,480,000 gain on the sale of a broadcast television station; a one-time charge of $7,100,000 in connection with a litigation settlement with Time Warner Cable; the $6,113,000 write-down of the Company's investment in National Media Corporation ("National Media"), equity in earningsCML Group, Inc.; the write-off of affiliates$2,350,000 of $1,983,000acquisition related costs; net gains of $9,129,000 recorded on the sale and interest incomeholdings of $2,138,000 earned on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. These items were partially offset by a $617,000 provision for estimated litigation costs associated with settling the shareholder litigation arising from the Company's terminated tender offer for National Media. NET INCOMEproperty and investments; and the HomeVisions restructuring and asset impairment charge of $2,950,000. Excluding these one-time pretax gains and charges, the Company had a net loss of $1,783,000 or $.07 per basic and diluted share. Net income was $18,104,000 or $.57 per basic and diluted share ($.57 per basic share) for the year ended January 31, 1998. Excluding the gain on the sale of television station WVVI, the gain on the sale of investments and loss on earnings from affiliates, the Company had a net loss of $9,030,000$5,508,000 or $.28 per diluted share ($.28$.17 per basic share).and diluted share. Net income was $18,090,000 or $.56 per diluted share ($.57 per basic share) for the year ended January 31, 1997. Excluding the gain on the sale of the two television stations, the gain on the sale of investments and equity in earnings from affiliates, the Company had net income of $847,000,$861,000, or $.03 per basic and diluted share ($.03 per basic share). Net income was $11,020,000 or $.38 per diluted share ($.38 per basic share) for the year ended January 31, 1996. Excluding the gain on sale of investments, equity in earnings of affiliates and the provision for litigation costs, the Company had net income for fiscal 1996 of $1,173,000 or $.04 per diluted share ($.04 per basic share).share. For the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, respectively, the Company had approximately 26,267,000, 31,888,000 32,342,000 and 29,309,000,32,342,000 diluted weighted average common shares outstanding and 25,963,000, 31,745,000 31,718,000 and 28,627,00031,718,000 basic weighted average common shares outstanding. For the years ended January 31, 1999 and 1998, net income reflects an income tax provision of $2,852,000 and $11,500,000, respectively, which results in an effective tax rate of 38% in fiscal 1999 and 39% in fiscal 1998. For the year ended January 31, 1997, net income reflects an income tax provision of $11,500,000 and $11,600,000 respectively, which results in an effective tax rate of 39% for each year. For the year ended January 31, 1996, net income reflects an income tax provision of $100,000.. As of January 31, 19981999, all net tax carryforwards available to offset future taxable income had been utilized. PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION The Company's television home shopping program was available to approximately 21.8 million cable homes as of January 31, 1999 as compared to 17.4 million cable homes as of January 31, 1998 as comparedand to 16.4 million cable homes as of January 31, 1997 and to 13.6 million cable homes as of January 31, 1996.1997. The Company's programming is currently available through affiliation and time-block purchase agreements with approximately 285336 cable systems and one wholly-owned full power UHF television broadcast station. In addition, the Company's programming is broadcast full-time over thirteentwelve owned or affiliated low power television stations in major markets, and is available unscrambled to homes equipped with satellite dishes. As of January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, the Company's programming 40 41 was available to approximately 14.9 million, 11.7 million 11.4 million and 10.511.4 million full-time equivalent cable homes ("FTE"), respectively. Approximately 10.6 million, 8.6 million 7.7 million and 7.27.7 million cable homes at January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, respectively, received the Company's programming on a full-time basis. Homes that receive the Company's programming 24 hours a day are counted as one FTE each and homes that receive the Company's television home shopping programming for any period less than 24 hours are counted based upon an analysis of time of day and day of week. 40 41 CIRCULATION With respect to the Company's direct marketing operations, approximately 4232 million and 4035 million HomeVisionsCVI catalogs were mailed in fiscal 19981999 and 1997,1998, respectively. At January 31, 1998, HomeVisions1999, CVI had approximately 548,000585,000 "active" catalog customers (defined as individuals that have purchased from the Company within the preceding 12 months) and combined customer and prospect files that totaled approximately 3.4 million names. Approximately 35 and 26 million CVI catalogs were mailed in fiscal 1998 and 1997, respectively. At January 31, 1998, CVI had approximately 553,000 active catalog customers and approximately 4.84.1 million customer names in its catalog customer list database. During fiscal 1999 and 1998, and 1997,respectively, BII had approximately 719 million and 678 million printed space advertisements or "impressions" circulated in national and regional newspapers and magazines. At January 31, 1998,1999, BII had approximately 210,000265,000 active customers and approximately 650,000733,000 customer names in its customer list database. YEAR 2000 CONSIDERATIONS The Year 2000 issue is the result of computer programs using only the last two digits to indicate the calendar year. If uncorrected, such computer programs may be unable to interpret dates correctly beyond the year 1999, which in turn, may cause computer system failure or other computer errors disrupting operations. The Company has reviewed the implications of yearits Year 2000 compliance issues and has takenformed a Year 2000 Compliance Project team to establish and take steps designed to ensure that the Company's computerinformation systems and software applications will manage dates beyond 1999. The scope of the Company's Year 2000 readiness effort includes the review of, and taking remedial action as necessary, regarding (i) information technology ("IT") components such as software and hardware; (ii) non-IT systems or embedded technology; and (iii) readiness of key third parties, including significant vendors and service providers and the electronic data interchange (EDI) with third parties. With respect to information systems and embedded technologies, management presently believes that a combination of software modification, upgrades and replacements will be necessary to mitigate the Company's Year 2000 issues. However, if such modifications are not made, or not completed on a timely basis, the Year 2000 issues could have a materially adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company expects to implement successfully the systems and programming changes necessary to be Year 2000 compliant in a timely manner. The target date for remediation of its information systems is August 31, 1999. The Company does not expect the cost of addressing its Year 2000 issues to have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity and is funding such costs with operating cash flows. Total costs are expected to be less than $500,000. In addition to internal Year 2000 remediation activities, the Company has also implemented a plan to communicate to its key suppliers, vendors and service providers the expectation that they attain Year 2000 compliance in a timely manner. While the Company expects its internal IT and non-IT systems to be Year 2000 compliant by the date specified, the Company is working on a contingency plan specifying what the Company will do if it or important third parties are not Year 2000 compliant by the required dates. The Company expects to have such a contingency plan finalized in 1999. The Company believes that it has allocated adequate resources for this purposeto address and that planned software upgrades, which are underway andachieve Year 2000 compliance in the normal course of business, will address the Company's internal year 2000 needs. While the Company expects that efforts on the part of current employees of the Company will be required to monitor year 2000 issues,a timely manner, however, no assurances can be given that these efforts or the efforts of key third parties will be successful. The Company does not expect the cost of addressing any year 2000 issue to be a material event or uncertainty that would have a material adverse effect on future operating results or financial condition. 41 42 QUARTERLY RESULTS The following summarized unaudited results of operations for the quarters in the fiscal years ended January 31, 19981999 and 19971998 have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and reflect adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of results of operations for the periods presented. The Company's results of operations have varied and may continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Results of operations in any period should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER TOTAL ------- ------- ------- ------- ----- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) FISCAL 1999: Net sales..................................... $43,676 $44,082 $50,027 $65,943 $203,728 Gross profit.................................. 18,654 18,130 20,497 28,690 85,971 Gross margin.................................. 42.7% 41.1% 41.0% 43.5% 42.2% Operating expenses............................ 20,942 21,267 25,721 26,610 94,540 Operating income (loss)....................... (2,288) (3,137) (5,224) 2,080 (8,569) Other income (expense), net................... 20,484 1,974 (5,005) (1,393) 16,060 Net income (loss)............................. $11,280 $ (721) $(6,341) $ 421 $ 4,639 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Net income (loss) per share(a)................ $ .42 $ (.03) $ (.25) $ .02 $ .18 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Net income (loss) per share -- assuming dilution(a)................................. $ .42 $ (.03) $ (.25) $ .02 $ .18 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic....................................... 26,781 25,979 25,467 25,626 25,963 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Diluted..................................... 26,877 25,979 25,467 26,491 26,267 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== FISCAL 1998: Net sales..................................... $51,062 $48,500 $58,325 $60,095 $217,982 Gross profit.................................. 22,695 19,924 25,726 26,829 95,174 Gross margin.................................. 44.4% 41.1% 44.1% 44.6% 43.7% Operating expenses............................ 25,819 24,632 27,411 28,287 106,149 Operating loss................................ (3,124) (4,708) (1,685) (1,458) (10,975) Other income, net............................. 212 39,219 548 600 40,579 Net income (loss)............................. $(1,761) $21,059 $ (666) $ (528) $ 18,104 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Net income (loss) per share:.................. $(.05) $.66 $(.02) $(.02) $.57share (a)............... $ (.05) $ .66 $ (.02) $ (.02) $ .57 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Net income (loss) per share -- assuming dilution.................................... $(.05) $.66 $(.02) $(.02) $.57dilution(a)................................. $ (.05) $ .66 $ (.02) $ (.02) $ .57 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic....................................... 32,949 31,829 31,874 30,330 31,745 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Diluted..................................... 33,10932,949 31,953 32,064 30,42731,874 30,330 31,888 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== FISCAL 1997: Net sales..................................... $22,788 $24,341 $47,118 $65,231 $159,478 Gross profit.................................. 9,388 9,728 18,661 29,586 67,363 Gross margin.................................. 41.2% 40.0% 39.6% 45.4% 42.2% Operating expenses............................ 10,071 10,523 19,421 29,988 70,003 Operating loss................................ (683) (795) (760) (402) (2,640) Other income, net............................. 28,086 1,036 1,773 1,435 32,330 Net income.................................... $16,453 $ 145 $ 609 $ 883 $ 18,090 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Net income per share(a)....................... $.56 $-- $.02 $.03 $.57 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Net income per share -- assuming dilution(a)................................. $.54 $-- $.02 $.03 $.56 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic....................................... 29,352 29,577 33,628 34,317 31,718 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Diluted..................................... 30,416 30,266 34,060 34,626 32,342 ======= ======= ======= ======= ========
- ------------------------- (a) The sum of quarterly per share amounts does not equal the annual amount due to changes in the calculation of average common and dilutive shares outstanding as well as the effectsrequired under Statement of rounding.Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share". FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES As of January 31, 19981999 and 1997,1998, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were $31,866,000$46,870,000 and $52,859,000,$31,866,000, respectively, a $20,993,000 decrease.$15,004,000 increase. For the year ended January 31, 1998,1999, working capital decreasedincreased $15,565,000 to $65,636,000 compared to a decrease of $13,234,000 to $50,071,000 compared to an increase of $11,779,000 to $63,305,000 for the year ended January 31, 1997.1998. The current ratio was 3.0 at January 31, 1999 compared to 2.7 at January 31, 1998 and 1997.1998. At January 31, 1999 and 1998, short-term investments and cash equivalents were primarily 42 43 invested in debt securities with original maturity dates of less than 270 days. 42 43In addition, at January 31, 1999, short-term investments consisted of certain equity investments in the amount of $2,606,000 classified as "trading securities". Total assets at January 31, 19981999 were $134,764,000$141,770,000 compared to $168,086,000$135,279,000 at January 31, 1997.1998. Shareholders' equity was $102,268,000$108,411,000 at January 31, 1999, compared to $104,653,000 at January 31, 1998, comparedan increase of $3,758,000. The increase in shareholders' equity for fiscal 1999 resulted primarily from reported net income of $4,639,000, proceeds received on the exercise of stock options of $1,729,000, other comprehensive income on available-for-sale investments of $1,050,000 and a $731,000 income tax benefit relating to $126,654,000 at January 31, 1997, a decreasestock options exercised, offset by $4,292,000 relating to the repurchase of $24,386,000.1,327,000 shares of Company common stock made in connection with the Company's authorized stock repurchase program. The decrease in shareholders' equity forfrom fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 resulted primarily relates tofrom an $18,387,000 reduction in equity recorded in connection with the Company's restructuring of its Operating and License Agreement with Montgomery Ward. As discussed further in Note 3the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Company restructured its operating agreement in an equity transaction whereby, among other matters, the Company agreed to cease the use of the Montgomery Ward and Montgomery Ward Direct names in its catalog operations in exchange for Montgomery Ward's return of 3.8 million common stock purchase warrants. In addition, shareholders' equity decreased as a result of the following: $17,360,000 relating to the purchase of 2,417,000 shares of Company common stock made in connection with the Company's authorized stock repurchase program and the repurchase of 1,280,000 shares from Montgomery Ward; unrealized holdingother comprehensive losses of $6,345,000 on available-for-sale investments; increasedinvestments of $3,934,000; increases in notes toreceivable from former officers of $369,000; and a $366,000 tax effect relating to the repurchase of warrants. The decreases in shareholders' equity were offset primarily by reported net income of $18,104,000 and proceeds of $298,000 received on the exercise of stock options of $299,000. The increase in shareholders' equity from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997 resulted primarily from net income of $18,090,000 for the year, $9,484,000 of value assigned to common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with the acquisition of MWD, proceeds received on the exercise of stock options and warrants of $1,150,000, a $790,000 income tax benefit relating to stock options exercised and an unrealized holding gain of $254,000 on investments available-for-sale, offset by $5,826,000 relating to the repurchase of 1,047,000 shares of Company common stock made in connection with the Company's authorized stock repurchase program.options. As of January 31, 1998,1999, the Company's long-term obligations consisted of a ten-year $600,000 note due and payable in 2006 related to the purchase of land, and capital lease obligations of $284,000 related to one of the Company's acquisitions and a five-year non-compete obligation totaling $153,000 related to the acquisition of WAKC, Akron, Ohio.$75,000. The Company has no other long-term debt obligations. For the year ended January 31, 1998,1999, net cash used for operating activities totaled $19,445,000$18,091,000 compared to net cash used of $19,445,000 in fiscal 1998 and $5,779,000 in fiscal 1997. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $2,304,000 in fiscal 1996. Cash flows from operations before consideration of changes in working capital items and investing and financing activities was a negative $3,570,000 in fiscal 1999 compared to a negative $3,998,000 in fiscal 1998 compared to a positive $3,357,000 in fiscal 1997 and a positive $4,042,000$3,356,000 in fiscal 1996.1997. Net cash used for operating activities for fiscal 1999 reflects net income, as adjusted for depreciation and amortization, equity in losses of affiliates, gains on the sale of property, investments and broadcast stations, unrealized gains on trading securities, the write-down of the investment in CML Group, Inc., the restructuring and asset impairment charge and the write-off of terminated acquisition costs. In addition, net cash used for operating activities for fiscal 1999 reflects increases in accounts receivable and inventories, offset by decreases in prepaid expenses, income taxes receivable and increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Accounts receivable increased primarily due to increased receivables due from customers for merchandise sales made pursuant to the "ValuePay" installment program. Inventories increased from 1998 to support increased sales volumes primarily with respect to the Company's television home shopping business, offset by decreases resulting from the downsizing and divestiture of the HomeVisions catalog operations. Prepaid expenses increased primarily as a result of the timing of contract payments for cable access fees and satellite rentals. The increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is primarily the result of increased inventory levels and the timing of related invoice payments offset by decreased payables and accrued liabilities as a result of the HomeVisions divestiture. Net cash used for operating activities for fiscal 1998 reflects net income, as adjusted for depreciation and amortization, equity in losses of affiliates and gaingains on the sale of a broadcast station and investments, increased accounts payable and accrued liabilities, increased net taxes receivable and funding required to support a higher level of accounts receivable, offset by a decrease in inventories and prepaid expenses. Accounts receivable primarily increased from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 due to the timing relative to receipt of funds from credit card companies, increased sales volume and increased receivables due from customers for merchandise sales made pursuant to the "ValuePay" installment program. Inventories decreased from prior yearfiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 as a result of tighter inventory management and changes in merchandise mix. Net cash used for operating activities for fiscal 1997 reflects net income, as adjusted for depreciation and amortization and gain on sale of broadcast stations and investments, increased accounts payable and accrued liabilities, decreased prepaid expenses and other, offset by funding required to support higher levels of accounts receivable and inventories as a result of increased sales volume and merchandise mix.43 44 During fiscal 1995, the Company introduced an installment payment program called ValuePay"ValuePay" which entitles customers to purchase merchandise and generally pay for the merchandise in two to four equal monthly installments. As of January 31, 1998,1999, the Company had approximately $2,756,000$16,554,000 due from customers under the ValuePay installment program, compared to $1,847,000$2,970,000 at January 31, 1997.1998. The increase in ValuePay receivables from fiscal 1998 is the result of sales incentive programs initiated during 1999 which emphasized the increased use of the installment payment program. ValuePay was introduced to increase sales while at the same time reducing return rates on merchandise with above-normal average selling prices. The Company intends to continue to sell merchandise using the ValuePay installment program. Receivables generated from the ValuePay program will be funded in fiscal 19992000 from the Company's present capital resources and future operating cash flows. Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $23,065,000$48,131,000 in fiscal 19981999 compared to $23,065,000 for fiscal 1998 and $19,223,000 for fiscal 1997 and net cash used of $11,443,000 for fiscal 1996.1997. Expenditures for property and equipment approximated $3,543,000were $1,565,000 in fiscal 19981999 compared to $3,543,000 for fiscal 1998 and $14,365,000 for fiscal 1997 and $3,041,000 for fiscal 1996. 43 441997. Expenditures for property and equipment for fiscal 19981999 and 19971998 primarily include (i) the upgrade of broadcast station and production equipment, studios and transmission equipment, (ii) the upgrade of computer software and related equipment, and (iii) increased leasehold improvements as a result of expanded operations. The increases in property and equipment in fiscal 1999 were offset by a decrease of approximately $5,100,000 related to the sale of land which had been held for investment purposes and decreases of approximately $594,000 of transmission and production equipment and other fixed assets resulting primarily from the sale of television broadcast station KBGE-TV. The increases in property and equipment in fiscal 1998 were offset by a decrease of approximately $3,000,000 of transmission and production equipment and other fixed assets resulting from the sale of its television broadcast station WVVI. In addition, fiscal 1997 expenditures include a $4.7 million$4,700,000 related to land purchase which is being held for future expansionpurchased in fiscal 1997 and investment purposes.sold in fiscal 1999. Principal future capital expenditures will be for upgrading television production and transmission equipment, studio expansions, expenditures pursuant to electronic commerce initiatives and order fulfillment equipment to support expanded operations, especially with respect to the Company's direct-mail operations. During fiscal 1999, the secondCompany received $9,548,000 of proceeds from the sale of real property in Eden Prairie, Minnesota and other investments. During the first quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company received $24,483,000 in proceeds from the sale of its broadcast television station KBGE-TV. In addition, during fiscal 1999, the Company disbursed $3,997,000 relating to certain investments and other long-term assets of which $1,818,000 related to costs associated with the terminated National Media Merger Agreement, advanced an additional $3,000,000 working capital loan in the form of a demand note to National Media Corporation and received $10,000,000 from National Media Corporation in connection with the repayment of the demand note. During fiscal 1998, the Company received approximately $30 million$30,000,000 in cash proceeds from the sale of television station WVVI. During fiscal 1998, theThe Company disbursed $6,632,000$6,631,000 relating to certain strategic investments and other long-term assets, granted a $7 million$7,000,000 working capital loan in the form of a Demand Notedemand note to National Media Corporation, bearing interest at prime plus 1.5%, received $1,381,000 in net proceeds from sales and distributions of certain long-term investments and received proceeds of $1,603,000 in collection of a long-term note receivable. Subsequent to January 31, 1998, the Company had loaned National Media the remaining $3 million available under the Demand Note. During fiscal 1997, the Company used net cash of approximately $4,114,000 in connection with the acquisition of three direct-mail companies and received $40.0 million in proceeds from the sale of two television stations; Akron ABC affiliate WAKC (TV) and independent station WHAI (TV). The Company paid approximately $3.8 million toward the acquisition of independent television station KBGE (TV), including acquisition costs and paid $800,000 at a second closing relative to broadcast station WVVI (TV). During fiscal 1997, the Company also received $6,104,000 in net proceeds from the sale of certain long-term investments and disbursed $6,534,000 for investments and other long-term assets. Net cash used for financing activities totaled $2,974,000 for fiscal 1999, $15,041,000 for fiscal 1998 and $4,888,000$4,889,000 for fiscal 1997. Net cash used for financing activities primarily relates to common stock repurchases made under the Company's common stock repurchase program, installment payments made under a five year non-compete obligation entered into upon the acquisition of a broadcast station and capital lease obligation payments offset by proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and warrants. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $7,547,000 for fiscal 1996 and was primarily due to proceeds received from Montgomery Ward for its initial investment of $8.0 million, offset by the payment of related offering costs.44 45 Management believes funds currently held by the Company will be sufficient to fund the Company's operations, the repurchase of any additional Company common stock pursuant to an authorized repurchase plan, anticipated capital expenditures and cable launch fees through fiscal 19992000. In addition, the Company anticipates receipt of approximately $44.3 million upon consummation of the transactions with NBC and costsGE Capital. Such capital will be available for general corporate purposes. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes and expenses associated withdoes not currently utilize derivative financial instruments. The operations of the proposed National Media Merger. Additional capital may be requiredCompany are conducted primarily in the event theUnited States and as such are not subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company has virtually no long-term debt, and accordingly, is ablenot significantly exposed to identify additional direct-mail company acquisition targets and television stations in strategic markets at favorable prices, and if the Company decides to acquire up to the maximum number of full power television stations that it may own under current regulations. 44interest rate risk. 45 4546 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PAGE ---- Report of Independent Public Accountants.................... 4647 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 19981999 and 1997...................................................... 471998...................................................... 48 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996........................... 481997........................... 49 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996............... 491997............... 50 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996........................... 501997........................... 52 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. 5153 Financial Statement Schedule -- Schedule II -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts....................................... 7279
4546 4647 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To ValueVision International, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ValueVision International, Inc. (a Minnesota corporation) and Subsidiaries as of January 31, 19981999 and 1997,1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 1998.1999. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ValueVision International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of January 31, 19981999 and 1997,1998, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 19981999 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 16, 1998 4615, 1999 47 4748 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JANUARY 31, -------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA) ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 17,198,07444,264 $ 28,618,94317,198 Short-term investments.................................... 14,667,669 24,239,8402,606 14,668 Accounts receivable, net.................................. 8,694,293 6,446,64919,466 8,694 Inventories, net.......................................... 20,426,862 28,109,081net 21,101 20,427 Prepaid expenses and other................................ 10,478,848 10,933,3948,576 10,479 Note receivable -- National Media Corporation............. 7,000,000 -- 7,000 Income taxes receivable................................... 748,319 --500 748 Deferred income taxes..................................... 447,000 2,681,000 ------------ ------------1,807 447 -------- -------- Total current assets................................... 79,661,065 101,028,907assets................................. 98,320 79,661 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET................................. 21,403,724 24,283,10814,069 21,404 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION LICENSES, NET............. 5,807,187 6,934,5462,019 5,807 MONTGOMERY WARD OPERATING AGREEMENT AND LICENSES, NET....... 2,073,360 15,052,9351,876 2,073 INVESTMENT IN PAXSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION............. 9,847,688 --9,713 9,848 GOODWILL, AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET................... 6,892,454 10,764,011NET............................................... 5,962 6,892 INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS, NET........................... 9,078,826 10,022,718 ------------ ------------ $134,764,304 $168,086,225 ============ ============9,160 9,079 DEFERRED INCOME TAXES....................................... 651 515 -------- -------- $141,770 $135,279 ======== ======== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Current portion of long-term obligations.................. $ 410,648393 $ 392,921411 Accounts payable.......................................... 17,643,895 24,887,90420,736 17,644 Accrued liabilities....................................... 11,535,551 12,398,041 Income taxes payable...................................... -- 45,008 ------------ ------------11,555 11,535 -------- -------- Total current liabilities.............................. 29,590,094 37,723,874 ------------ ------------liabilities............................ 32,684 29,590 LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS....................................... 1,036,821 1,443,189 DEFERRED INCOME TAXES....................................... 1,869,660 2,265,000 ------------ ------------675 1,036 -------- -------- Total liabilities...................................... 32,496,575 41,432,063 ------------ ------------liabilities.................................... 33,359 30,626 -------- -------- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 4, 7, 9,8, 10, and 10)11) SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 26,780,77825,865,466 and 28,842,19826,780,778 shares issued and outstanding............................................ 267,808 288,422 Common stock purchase warrants; 0 and 5,368,557 shares.... -- 26,984,038259 268 Additional paid-in capital................................ 74,538,225 83,309,455 Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments available-for-sale..................................... (6,275,652) 69,43772,715 74,538 Accumulated other comprehensive losses.................... (2,841) (3,891) Notes receivable from officers............................ (960,476) (591,445)shareholders........................ (1,059) (960) Retained earnings......................................... 34,697,824 16,594,255 ------------ ------------39,337 34,698 -------- -------- Total shareholders' equity............................. 102,267,729 126,654,162 ------------ ------------ $134,764,304 $168,086,225 ============ ============equity........................... 108,411 104,653 -------- -------- $141,770 $135,279 ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets. 4748 4849 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA) NET SALES........................................... $217,981,886 $159,477,917 $88,909,853SALES................................................ $ 203,728 $ 217,982 $ 159,478 COST OF SALES....................................... 122,807,613 92,114,663 52,268,398 ------------ ------------ -----------SALES............................................ 117,757 122,808 92,115 ---------- ---------- ---------- Gross profit...................................... 95,174,273 67,363,254 36,641,455 ------------ ------------ -----------profit........................................ 85,971 95,174 67,363 ---------- ---------- ---------- OPERATING EXPENSES: Distribution and selling.......................... 89,018,303 56,819,304 28,177,953selling............................... 74,649 89,018 56,820 General and administrative........................ 10,153,565 7,187,377 4,421,924administrative............................. 11,942 10,154 7,187 Depreciation and amortization..................... 6,977,594 5,996,357 4,807,735 ------------ ------------ -----------amortization.......................... 4,999 6,977 5,996 Restructuring and impairment of assets................. 2,950 -- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total operating expenses....................... 106,149,462 70,003,038 37,407,612 ------------ ------------ -----------expenses............................ 94,540 106,149 70,003 ---------- ---------- ---------- OPERATING LOSS...................................... (10,975,189) (2,639,784) (766,157) ------------ ------------ -----------LOSS........................................... (8,569) (10,975) (2,640) ---------- ---------- ---------- OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): Gain on sale of broadcast stations................ 38,850,000 27,050,000 --stations..................... 19,750 38,850 27,050 Gain on sale of investments....................... 214,694 808,449 8,480,453 Litigation costs..................................property and investments............... 8,102 215 809 Time Warner litigation settlement...................... (7,100) -- -- (617,000)Write-down of investment in CML Group, Inc............. (6,113) -- -- National Media Corporation terminated acquisition costs............................................... (2,350) -- -- Unrealized gain on trading securities.................. 1,350 -- -- Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates......... (431,241) 419,430 1,983,226affiliates.............. (323) (431) 419 Interest income................................... 2,116,352 3,912,231 2,137,720income........................................ 2,904 2,116 3,912 Other, net........................................ (171,047) 139,396 (98,677) ------------ ------------ -----------net............................................. (160) (171) 140 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total other income............................. 40,578,758 32,329,506 11,885,722 ------------ ------------ -----------income.................................. 16,060 40,579 32,330 ---------- ---------- ---------- INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES............ 29,603,569 29,689,722 11,119,565TAXES................. 7,491 29,604 29,690 Provision for income taxes 11,500,000 11,600,000 100,000 ------------ ------------ -----------taxes.......................... 2,852 11,500 11,600 ---------- ---------- ---------- NET INCOME..........................................INCOME............................................... $ 18,103,5694,639 $ 18,089,722 $11,019,565 ============ ============ ===========18,104 $ 18,090 ========== ========== ========== NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE.........................SHARE.............................. $ 0.18 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 $ 0.38 ============ ============ ===================== ========== ========== NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -- ASSUMING DILUTION....DILUTION......... $ 0.18 $ 0.57 $ 0.56 $ 0.38 ============ ============ ===================== ========== ========== Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: Basic.............................................Basic.................................................. 25,963,341 31,745,437 31,718,390 28,627,356 ============ ============ =========== Diluted...........................................========== ========== ========== Diluted................................................ 26,266,814 31,888,229 32,342,082 29,308,692 ============ ============ ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 48 49 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
NET UNREALIZED COMMON STOCK COMMON HOLDING NOTES --------------------- STOCK ADDITIONAL GAINS (LOSSES) RECEIVABLE NUMBER PAR PURCHASE PAID-IN ON INVESTMENTS FROM OF SHARES VALUE WARRANTS CAPITAL AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE OFFICERS --------- ----- -------- ---------- ------------------ ---------- BALANCE, January 31, 1995......... 27,986,426 $279,864 $ -- $ 79,651,718 $ (614,526) $ -- Exercise of stock options......... 77,322 773 -- 141,071 -- Issuance of common stock.......... 1,280,000 12,800 -- 7,987,200 -- -- Value assigned to common stock purchase warrants................ -- -- 17,500,000 -- -- -- Offering expenses................. -- -- -- (590,050) -- -- Unrealized holding gain on investments available-for-sale... -- -- -- -- 429,756 -- Issuance of note to officers...... -- -- -- -- -- (558,670) Net income........................ -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------- -------- ------------ ------------ ----------- --------- BALANCE, January 31, 1996......... 29,343,748 293,437 17,500,000 87,189,939 (184,770) (558,670) Exercise of stock options and warrants......................... 545,150 5,452 -- 1,144,943 -- -- Repurchases of common stock....... (1,046,700) (10,467) -- (5,815,427) -- -- Value assigned to common stock purchase warrants................ -- -- 9,484,038 -- -- -- Income tax benefit from stock options exercised................ -- -- -- 790,000 -- -- Unrealized holding gain on investments available-for-sale... -- -- -- -- 254,207 -- Increase in notes receivable from officers......................... -- -- -- -- -- (32,775) Net income........................ -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------- -------- ------------ ------------ ----------- --------- BALANCE, January 31, 1997......... 28,842,198 288,422 26,984,038 83,309,455 69,437 (591,445) Exercise of stock options and warrants......................... 1,636,080 16,361 -- 282,161 -- -- Repurchases of common stock and warrants......................... (3,697,500) (36,975) (18,386,927) (17,323,502) -- -- Value transferred from common stock purchase warrants.......... -- -- (8,597,111) 8,597,111 -- -- Income tax effect of warrants repurchased...................... -- -- -- (366,000) -- -- Income tax benefit from stock options exercised................ -- -- -- 39,000 -- -- Unrealized holding loss on investments available-for-sale... -- -- -- -- (6,345,089) -- Increase in notes receivable from officers......................... -- -- -- -- -- (369,031) Net income........................ -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------- -------- ------------ ------------ ----------- --------- BALANCE, January 31, 1998......... 26,780,778 $267,808 $ -- $ 74,538,225 $(6,275,652) $(960,476) ========== ======== ============ ============ =========== ========= RETAINED TOTAL EARNINGS SHAREHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY --------- ------------- BALANCE, January 31, 1995......... $(12,515,032) $ 66,802,024 Exercise of stock options......... -- 141,844 Issuance of common stock.......... -- 8,000,000 Value assigned to common stock purchase warrants................ -- 17,500,000 Offering expenses................. -- (590,050) Unrealized holding gain on investments available-for-sale... -- 429,756 Issuance of note to officers...... -- (558,670) Net income........................ 11,019,565 11,019,565 ------------ ------------ BALANCE, January 31, 1996......... (1,495,467) 102,744,469 Exercise of stock options and warrants......................... -- 1,150,395 Repurchases of common stock....... -- (5,825,894) Value assigned to common stock purchase warrants................ -- 9,484,038 Income tax benefit from stock options exercised................ -- 790,000 Unrealized holding gain on investments available-for-sale... -- 254,207 Increase in notes receivable from officers......................... -- (32,775) Net income........................ 18,089,722 18,089,722 ------------ ------------ BALANCE, January 31, 1997......... 16,594,255 126,654,162 Exercise of stock options and warrants......................... -- 298,522 Repurchases of common stock and warrants......................... -- (35,747,404) Value transferred from common stock purchase warrants.......... -- -- Income tax effect of warrants repurchased...................... -- (366,000) Income tax benefit from stock options exercised................ -- 39,000 Unrealized holding loss on investments available-for-sale... -- (6,345,089) Increase in notes receivable from officers......................... -- (369,031) Net income........................ 18,103,569 18,103,569 ------------ ------------ BALANCE, January 31, 1998......... $ 34,697,824 $102,267,729 ============ ====================== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 49 50 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
ACCUMULATED COMMON STOCK COMMON OTHER ------------------ STOCK ADDITIONAL COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE NUMBER PAR PURCHASE PAID-IN INCOME INCOME OF SHARES VALUE WARRANTS CAPITAL (LOSSES) ------------- --------- ----- -------- ---------- ------------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA) BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1996................... 29,343,748 $293 $ 17,500 $87,190 $ (115) Comprehensive income: Net income $18,090 -- -- -- -- -- Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Unrealized gains on securities, net of tax of $97......... 158 -- -- -- -- 158 ------- Comprehensive income: $18,248 ======= Exercise of stock options and warrants........... 545,150 5 -- 1,145 -- Repurchases of common stock.................. (1,046,700) (10) -- (5,815) -- Value assigned to common stock purchase warrants............... -- -- 9,484 -- -- Income tax benefit from stock options exercised.............. -- -- -- 790 -- Increase in notes receivable from shareholders........... -- -- -- -- -- ---------- ---- -------- ------- ------- BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1997................... 28,842,198 288 26,984 83,310 43 Comprehensive income: Net income............. $18,104 -- -- -- -- -- Other comprehensive losses, net of tax: Unrealized losses on securities, net of tax of $2,395...... (3,908) Losses on securities included in net income, net of tax of $16............. (26) ------- Other comprehensive losses............... (3,934) -- -- -- -- (3,934) ------- Comprehensive income:......... $14,170 ======= Exercise of stock options and warrants........... 1,636,080 16 -- 282 -- Repurchases of common stock and warrants..... (3,697,500) (36) (18,387) (17,324) -- Value transferred from common stock purchase warrants............... -- -- (8,597) 8,597 -- Income tax effect of warrants repurchased... -- -- -- (366) -- Income tax benefit from stock options exercised.............. -- -- -- 39 -- Increase in notes receivable from shareholders........... -- -- -- -- -- ---------- ---- -------- ------- ------- NOTES RECEIVABLE RETAINED TOTAL FROM EARNINGS SHAREHOLDERS' SHAREHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY ------------ --------- ------------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA) BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1996................... $ (559) $(1,496) $102,813 Comprehensive income: Net income -- 18,090 18,090 Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Unrealized gains on securities, net of tax of $97......... -- -- 158 Comprehensive income: Exercise of stock options and warrants........... -- -- 1,150 Repurchases of common stock.................. -- -- (5,825) Value assigned to common stock purchase warrants............... -- -- 9,484 Income tax benefit from stock options exercised.............. -- -- 790 Increase in notes receivable from shareholders........... (32) -- (32) ------- ------- -------- BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1997................... (591) 16,594 126,628 Comprehensive income: Net income............. -- 18,104 18,104 Other comprehensive losses, net of tax: Unrealized losses on securities, net of tax of $2,395...... Losses on securities included in net income, net of tax of $16............. Other comprehensive losses............... -- -- (3,934) Comprehensive income:......... Exercise of stock options and warrants........... -- -- 298 Repurchases of common stock and warrants..... -- -- (35,747) Value transferred from common stock purchase warrants............... -- -- -- Income tax effect of warrants repurchased... -- -- (366) Income tax benefit from stock options exercised.............. -- -- 39 Increase in notes receivable from shareholders........... (369) -- (369) ------- ------- --------
50 51
ACCUMULATED COMMON STOCK COMMON OTHER ------------------ STOCK ADDITIONAL COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE NUMBER PAR PURCHASE PAID-IN INCOME INCOME OF SHARES VALUE WARRANTS CAPITAL (LOSSES) ------------- --------- ----- -------- ---------- ------------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA) BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1998................... 26,780,778 268 -- 74,538 (3,891) Comprehensive income: Net income............. $ 4,639 -- -- -- -- -- Other comprehensive income (losses), net of tax: Unrealized losses on securities, net of tax of $1,610...... (2,627) Gains on securities included in net income, net of tax of $60............. 98 Write-down of securities to net realizable value, net of tax of $1,499............. 3,579 ------- Other comprehensive income............... 1,050 -- -- -- -- 1,050 ------- Comprehensive income:......... $ 5,689 ======= Exercise of stock options................ 412,118 4 -- 1,725 -- Repurchases of common stock.................. (1,327,430) (13) -- (4,279) -- Income tax benefit from stock options exercised.............. -- -- -- 731 -- Increase in notes receivable from shareholders........... -- -- -- -- -- ---------- ---- -------- ------- ------- BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1999................... 25,865,466 $259 $ -- $72,715 $(2,841) ========== ==== ======== ======= ======= NOTES RECEIVABLE RETAINED TOTAL FROM EARNINGS SHAREHOLDERS' SHAREHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY ------------ --------- ------------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA) BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1998................... (960) 34,698 104,653 Comprehensive income: Net income............. -- 4,639 4,639 Other comprehensive income (losses), net of tax: Unrealized losses on securities, net of tax of $1,610...... Gains on securities included in net income, net of tax of $60............. Write-down of securities to net realizable value, net of tax of $1,499............. Other comprehensive income............... -- -- 1,050 Comprehensive income:......... Exercise of stock options................ -- -- 1,729 Repurchases of common stock.................. -- -- (4,292) Income tax benefit from stock options exercised.............. -- -- 731 Increase in notes receivable from shareholders........... (99) -- (99) ------- ------- -------- BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1999................... $(1,059) $39,337 $108,411 ======= ======= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 51 52 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, -------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- (IN THOUSANDS) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income.......................................income................................................ $ 18,103,5694,639 $ 18,089,72218,104 $ 11,019,56518,090 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities --activities- Depreciation and amortization................. 6,977,594 5,996,357 4,807,735amortization.......................... 4,999 6,977 5,996 Deferred taxes................................ 1,838,660 (236,668) (250,000)taxes......................................... (1,408) 1,840 (236) Gain on sale of broadcast stations............ (38,850,000) (27,050,000) --stations..................... (19,750) (38,850) (27,050) Gain on sale of investments................... (214,694) (808,449) (8,480,453)property and investments............... (8,102) (215) (809) Write-down of investment in CML Group, Inc............. 6,113 -- -- Restructuring and impairment of assets................. 2,950 -- -- National Media Corporation terminated acquisition costs................................................ 2,350 -- -- Unrealized gain on trading securities.................. (1,350) -- -- Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates..... 431,241 (419,430) (1,983,226) Other non-cash charges........................ -- -- 646,268affiliates.............. 323 431 (419) Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: Accounts receivable, net.................... (3,762,629) (555,925) (2,064,405)net............................. (11,021) (3,763) (556) Inventories, net............................ 5,682,219 (4,479,713) (1,056,425)net..................................... (2,255) 5,682 (4,480) Prepaid expenses and other.................. 627,401 1,889,663 (3,230,141)other........................... 1,553 627 1,890 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.... (9,157,557) 1,433,867 2,894,713liabilities............. 2,620 (9,158) 1,434 Income taxes payable (receivable), net...... (1,120,327) 361,481 -- ------------ ------------ ------------net............... 248 (1,120) 361 -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used for)used for operating activities............................. (19,444,523) (5,779,095) 2,303,631 ------------ ------------ ------------activities............ (18,091) (19,445) (5,779) -------- -------- -------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Property and equipment additions, net of effect of acquisitions............................... (3,543,054) (14,364,600) (3,040,865)acquisitions........................................... (1,565) (3,543) (14,365) Purchase of broadcast stations...................stations............................ -- (4,618,743) -- (4,619) Acquisition of direct-mail companies, net of cash acquired......................................acquired............................................... -- (4,113,984) -- (4,114) Proceeds from sale of broadcast stations......... 30,000,000 40,000,000 --stations.................. 24,483 30,000 40,000 Proceeds from sale of investments................ 1,381,162 6,103,541 16,438,979investments and property............ 9,548 1,381 6,104 Purchase of short-term investments............... (43,866,856) (84,506,099) (55,094,124)investments........................ (12,394) (43,867) (84,506) Proceeds from sale of short-term investments..... 51,121,965 87,256,886 33,710,220investments.............. 25,056 51,122 87,257 Loan to National Media........................... (7,000,000) --Media Corporation........................ (3,000) (7,000) -- Payment for investments and other assets......... (6,631,791) (6,534,383) (3,457,071)assets.................. (3,997) (6,631) (6,534) Proceeds from long-term notes receivable......... 1,603,439loans receivable............................ 10,000 1,603 -- -- ------------ ------------ -------------------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities............................. 23,064,865 19,222,618 (11,442,861) ------------ ------------ ------------activities......... 48,131 23,065 19,223 -------- -------- -------- FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants...................................... 298,522 1,150,395 141,844warrants...... 1,729 299 1,150 Payments for repurchases of common stock......... (14,963,837) (5,825,894) -- Proceeds from sale of common stock............... -- -- 8,000,000 Payment of offering costs........................ -- -- (464,167)stock.................. (4,292) (14,964) (5,826) Payment of long-term obligations................. (375,896) (212,982) (130,500) ------------ ------------ ------------obligations.......................... (411) (376) (213) -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used for)used for financing activities............................. (15,041,211) (4,888,481) 7,547,177 ------------ ------------ ------------activities............ (2,974) (15,041) (4,889) -------- -------- -------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents............................ (11,420,869) 8,555,042 (1,592,053)equivalents..................................... 27,066 (11,421) 8,555 BEGINNING CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS................ 28,618,943 20,063,901 21,655,954 ------------ ------------ ------------EQUIVALENTS......................... 17,198 28,619 20,064 -------- -------- -------- ENDING CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS...................EQUIVALENTS............................ $ 17,198,07444,264 $ 28,618,94317,198 $ 20,063,901 ============ ============ ============28,619 ======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 5052 5153 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JANUARY 31, 19981999 AND 19971998 1. THE COMPANY: ValueVision International, Inc. and Subsidiaries ("the Company") is an integrated direct marketing company which markets its products directly to consumers through electronic and print media. The Company's television home shopping networkbusiness uses recognized on-air television home shopping personalities to market brand name merchandise and proprietary and private label consumer products at competitive or discount prices. The Company's 24-hour per day television home shopping programming is distributed primarily through long-term cable affiliation agreements and the purchase of month-to-month full-and part-time block lease agreements of cable and broadcast television time. In addition, the Company distributes its programming through a Company owned or affiliated full power Ultra-High Frequency ("UHF") broadcast television stations,station, low power television ("LPTV") stations and to satellite dish owners. The Company also complements its television home shopping business by the sale of merchandise through its Internet shopping website (www.vvtv.com). The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ValueVision Direct Marketing Company, Inc. ("VVDM"), is a direct-mail marketer of a broad range of quality general merchandise which is sold to consumers through direct-mail catalogs and other direct marketing solicitations. Products offered include domestics, housewares, home accessories and electronics. Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Catalog Ventures, Inc. ("CVI"), the Company sells a variety of fashion jewelry, health and beauty aids, books, audio and video cassettes and other related consumer merchandise through the publication of five consumer specialty catalogs. The Company also manufactures and markets, via direct-mail, women's foundation undergarments and other women's apparel through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Beautiful Images, Inc. ("BII"). 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ValueVision International, Inc. ("ValueVision") and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Results of operations for the year ended January 31, 1997 include the direct-mail operations of HomeVisions (formerly known as Montgomery Ward Direct) effective July 27, 1996, BII effective October 22, 1996 and CVI effective November 1, 1996, which were acquired by the Company in fiscal 1997. FISCAL YEAR The Company's fiscal year ends on January 31. Fiscal years are designated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes by the calendar year in which the fiscal year ends. REVENUE RECOGNITION AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Revenue is recognized at the time merchandise is shipped. Shipping and handling fees collected from customers are recognized as merchandise is shipped and are offset against actual shipping expenses as a component of distribution and selling costs. Returns are estimated and provided for at the time of sale based on historical experience. Payments received for unfilled orders are reflected as a component of accrued liabilities. Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due from customers for merchandise sales and from credit card companies, and are reflected net of reserves for estimated uncollectible amounts of $1,726,000 at January 31, 1999 and $453,000 at January 31, 1998 and $529,000 at January 31, 1997. 511998. 53 5254 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 19981999 AND 19971998 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, money market funds and commercial paper with an original maturity of 90 days or less. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS Short-term investments consist principally of commercial paper with a remaining maturity of less than 12 months and are stated at cost, which approximates market value due to the short maturities of these instruments.instruments and equity investments classified as "trading securities". INVESTMENTS IN EQUITY SECURITIES The Company classifies certain investments in equity securities as "available-for-sale" under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("SFAS No. 115"), and reports these investments at fair value. Under SFAS No. 115, unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from income and are reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Realized gains and losses from securities classified as available-for-sale are included in income and are determined using the average cost method for ascertaining the cost of securities sold. Information onregarding available-for-sale investments in equity securities is as follows:
GROSS GROSS UNREALIZED UNREALIZED COST GAINS LOSSES FAIR VALUE ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- January 31, 1999 equity securities............ $14,295,000 $-- $4,582,000 $ 9,713,000 =========== == ========== =========== January 31, 1998 equity securities............ $21,044,000 $ --$-- $6,276,000 $14,768,000 =========== ======= ========== =========== January 31, 1997 equity securities............ $ 181,000 $69,000 $ -- $ 250,000 =========== ========= ========== ===========
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115, the Company wrote off its investment in CML Group, Inc. ("CML") in fiscal 1999. The decline in the investment's fair value was judged by management to be other than temporary following CML's announcement that its NordicTrack subsidiary had filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The write-off totaled approximately $6,113,000. Subsequently, CML also filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As of January 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, $0 and 1997 respectively, $4,920,000 and $0 of available-for-sale investments were classified as short-term investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale were $662,000, $3,084,000 $4,608,000 and $16,439,000$4,608,000 in fiscal 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, respectively, and related netgross realized gains included in income were $26,000, $215,000 $808,000 and $8,480,000$808,000 in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. As of January 31, 1999 and 1996, respectively.1998, respectively, the Company had $2,606,000 and $0 of investments classified as trading securities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Net unrealized holding gains on trading securities included in income during fiscal 1999 totaled $1,350,000. See additional discussion in Note 15 regarding these trading securities. There were no unrealized holding gains or losses recorded with respect to trading securities during fiscal 1998 or 1997 as the Company did not have any equity investments classified as such in those years. 54 55 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 INVENTORIES Inventories, which consist primarily of consumer merchandise held for resale, are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or realizable value. ADVERTISING COSTS Promotional advertising expenditures are expensed in the period the advertising initially takes place. Direct response advertising costs, consisting primarily of catalog preparation, printing and postage expenditures, are deferred and amortized over the period during which the benefits are expected, generally three to six months. Advertising costs of $31,729,000, $44,894,000 $21,164,000 and $2,013,000$21,164,000 for the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, respectively, are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Prepaid expenses and other includes deferred advertising costs of $4,538,000 at January 31, 1999 and $6,114,000 at January 31, 1998, and $6,268,000 at January 31, 1997, which will be reflected as an expense during the quarterly period benefited. 52 53 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are stated at cost. Betterments and renewals that extend the life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the related accounts, and any residual values are charged or credited to operations. Depreciation and amortization for financial reporting purposes are provided principally on the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives. During fiscal 1999, the Company sold real property held for investment purposes and recognized a $3,471,000 gain on the sale. Property and equipment consisted of the following at January 31:
ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE (IN YEARS) 1999 1998 1997 ----------- ---- ---- Land and improvements....................................improvements.................... -- $ 6,564,0001,405,000 $ 7,151,0006,564,000 Buildings and improvements...............................improvements............... 40 4,267,000 4,326,000 4,630,000 Transmission and production equipment....................equipment.... 5-20 7,734,000 7,744,000 10,226,000 Office and warehouse equipment...........................equipment........... 3-10 4,332,000 4,033,000 2,962,000 Computer and telephone equipment.........................equipment......... 3-5 4,849,000 4,267,000 3,726,000 Leasehold improvements...................................improvements................... 3-10 2,120,000 2,074,000 1,720,000 Less -- Accumulated depreciation and amortization........amortization........................... (10,638,000) (7,604,000) (6,132,000)------------ ----------- -----------$ 14,069,000 $21,404,000 $24,283,000 ======================= ===========
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION LICENSES Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") licenses are stated at acquisition cost as determined based upon independent appraisals and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 25 years. Accumulated amortization was $452,000 at January 31, 1999 and $653,000 at January 31, 1998 and $529,000 at January 31, 1997.1998. Although the FCC has established eight year license terms for television stations, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires the FCC to grant applications for renewal of such licenses upon a finding that (i) the station has served the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (ii) there have been no serious violations by the licensee of the Communications actTelecommunications Act or the FCC's rules and regulations; and (iii) there have been no other violations by the licensee of such Act or rules and regulations which, taken together, would 55 56 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 constitute a pattern of abuse. The Company has met and continues to meet the requirements set forth above, and based further on standard industry practice, the Company has determined that 25 years is a reasonable estimated useful life for its FCC licenses, considering the future periods to be benefited. MONTGOMERY WARD OPERATING AGREEMENT AND LICENSES As discussed further in Note 3, during fiscal 1996, the Company issued common stock purchase warrants in exchange for various agreements entered into with Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated ("Montgomery Ward") including an Operating Agreement, a Credit Card License and Receivable Sales Agreement, and a Servicemark License Agreement. The value assigned to the agreements of $17,500,000 was determined pursuant to an independent appraisal and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the amended term of the agreements (see discussion below and Note 3). The Operating Agreement expires July 31, 2008 and may be terminated under certain circumstances, as defined in the agreement. The Credit Card License and Receivable Sales Agreement and Servicemark License Agreement automatically terminate upon termination of the Operating Agreement. 53 54 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company and Montgomery Ward restructured the Operating Agreement in an equity transaction whereby certain rights and arrangements with respect to both the Company's television home shopping and catalog operations were modified and amended and, among other matters, the Company agreed to cease the use of the Montgomery Ward and Montgomery Ward Direct names in its catalog operations in exchange for Montgomery Ward's return of 3.8 million common stock purchase warrants.operations. As a result of the restructuring, the Montgomery Ward Operating Agreement and License asset was reduced to $2,115,000 which representsrepresented the asset's remaining fair value assigned to the Company's non-catalog operations. The value assigned to the asset as of the date of the restructuring was determined through an analysis of the future cash flows and benefits expected to be received and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement. As of January 31, 1999, accumulated amortization related to this asset totaled $239,000. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill represents the cost in excess of fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired in purchase transactions, and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 15 to 25 years. Other intangible assets represent costs allocated to customer lists arising from business acquisitions and are amortized on a straight-line basis over 5 years. The carrying values of goodwill are evaluated periodically by the Company in relation to the operating performance and future undiscounted net cash flows of the related acquired businesses. As discussed further in Note 3, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company restructured its operating agreement with Montgomery Ward in an equity transaction whereby, among other matters, the Company agreed to cease the use of the Montgomery Ward and Montgomery Ward Direct names in its catalog operations in exchange for Montgomery Ward's return of 3.8 million common stock purchase warrants. As a result of the restructuring, $5,259,000, representing the remaining balancebalances of goodwill and other intangible assets ($5,259,000) relating to the acquisition of Montgomery Ward Direct were reduced to zero through equity in the transaction.transaction in fiscal 1998. Accumulated amortization of goodwill related to other acquisitions was $1,012,000 at January 31, 1999 and $671,000 at January 31, 1998 and $660,000 at January1998. 56 57 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1997.1999 AND 1998 INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS Investments and other assets consisted of the following at January 31:
1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- Investments........................................Investments........................................... $3,348,000 $4,211,000 $ 4,444,000 Prepaid cable launch fees, net.....................net........................ 1,575,000 1,622,000 2,382,000 Other, net.........................................net............................................ 4,237,000 3,246,000 3,197,000 ---------- --------------------- $9,160,000 $9,079,000 $10,023,000 ========== =====================
Included in these investments are certain nonmarketable investments in private companies and other enterprises which are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The fair values of these investments are estimated based primarily on recent financing and securities transactions, present value and other pricing models, and, to a lesser extent, other pertinent information, including financial condition and operating results. At January 31, 1998,1999, investments also include approximately $1,179,000$854,000 related to a 13% interest in a venture capital limited partnership. The purpose of the limited partnership is to invest in and assist new and emerging growth-oriented businesses and leveraged buyouts in the consumer services, retailing and direct marketing industries. In addition to the Company, Merchant Advisors, L.P. is the only other limited partner in the limited partnership. The investment in this partnership is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. InDuring fiscal 1996, the Company received a distribution of certain investment securities from the 54 55 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 limited partnership, including common stock1999 and common stock purchase warrants, valued at $2,744,000, as determined pursuant to an independent financial appraisal. During fiscal 1998, the Company received cash distributions of approximately $1,061,000 and $1,101,000, respectively, from the limited partnership. At January 31, 1998,1999, investments also include approximately $1,030,000$1,380,000 related to the Company's investment interest in Net Radio Corporation ("Net Radio") which was purchased in March 1997 for an aggregate purchase price of $3 million, consisting of $1 million in cash and a commitment to provide $2 million in future advertising. Net Radio is a music and entertainment site on the Internet where the Company's 24-hour per day shopping program is currently being carried.Internet. The investment is being accounted for under the cost method. Prepaid cable launch fees represent amounts paid to cable operators upon entering into cable affiliation agreements. These fees are capitalized and amortized over the lives of the related cable affiliation contracts, which range from 2-73-7 years. Other assets consist principally of non-compete agreements, prepaid satellite transponder launch fees, long-term deposits, notes receivable, deferred acquisition costs, and software development costs, all of which are carried at cost, net of accumulated amortization. Costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from 3 to 25 years. Accumulated amortization was $747,000 at January 31, 1999 and $685,000 at January 31, 1998 and $433,000 at1998. At January 31, 1997.1999, other assets also includes a $1,443,000 long-term receivable related to the third-party sale of the Company's HomeVisions catalog trade name and customer lists. The sale was made in conjunction with the divestiture of the HomeVisions catalog operations discussed in Note 5. The receivable was recorded at its net present value and payments are to be received in quarterly installments through 2003. 57 58 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 ACCRUED LIABILITIES Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
JANUARY 31, -------------------------- 1999 1998 ---- ---- Accrued marketing fees.............................. $ 3,688,000 $ 2,248,000 Reserve for product returns......................... 2,291,000 1,443,000 Other............................................... 5,576,000 7,844,000 ----------- ----------- $11,555,000 $11,535,000 =========== ===========
INCOME TAXES The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method of accounting under which deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwardscarry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of the enactment of such laws. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" ("SFAS No. 128"), which established newestablishes guidelines for computing and presenting earnings per share data ("EPS"). SFAS No. 128 replacesreplaced primary EPS with basic EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing reported earnings by weighted average shares outstanding, excluding potentially dilutive securities. Fully diluted EPS, termed diluted EPS under SFAS No. 128, is also to be disclosed. The Company adopted SFAS No. 128 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998. The adoption of SFAS No. 128 did not have a significant effect on previously reported earnings per share information. 55 56 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 A reconciliation of EPS calculations under SFAS No. 128 is as follows:
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- Net income..........................................income............................... $4,639,000 $18,104,000 $18,090,000 $11,020,000 ===================== =========== =========== Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -- Basic..............................Basic................... 25,963,000 31,745,000 31,718,000 28,627,000 Dilutive effect of stock options....................options......... 304,000 143,000 624,000 682,000 --------------------- ----------- ----------- Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -- Diluted............................Diluted................. 26,267,000 31,888,000 32,342,000 29,309,000 ===================== =========== =========== Net income per common share......................... $0.57 $0.57 $0.38 ===========share.............. $ 0.18 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 ========== =========== =========== Net income per common share -- assuming dilution.... $0.57 $0.56 $0.38 ===========dilution............................... $ 0.18 $ 0.57 $ 0.56 ========== =========== ===========
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME In the first quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" ("SFAS No. 130"), which establishes standards for reporting in the financial statements all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investments by and distributions to owners. For the Company, comprehensive income includes net income and other 58 59 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 comprehensive income (loss) which consists of unrealized holding gains and losses from equity investments classified as "available-for-sale". Total comprehensive income was $5,689,000, $14,170,000 and $18,248,000 for the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" ("SFAS No. 107"), requires disclosures of fair value information about financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. SFAS No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company. The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair values for financial instruments: The carrying amountamounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet approximatessheets approximate the fair value for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, due to the short maturities of those instruments. Fair values for long-term investments are based on quoted market prices, where available. For equity securities not actively traded, fair values are estimated by using quoted market prices of comparable instruments or, if there are no relevant comparables, on pricing models or formulas using current assumptions. The fair value for the Company's long-term debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company's current incremental borrowing rates, for similar types of borrowing arrangements, and approximated carrying value at January 31, 19981999 and 1997.1998. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during reporting periods. These estimates relate primarily to the carrying amounts of accounts receivable and inventories, the realizability of certain long-term assets and the recorded balances of certain accrued liabilities and reserves. Ultimate results could differ from the use of these estimates. 56 57 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain 19971998 and 19961997 amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 19981999 presentation, with no impact on previously reported net income. 3. MONTGOMERY WARD ALLIANCE: During fiscal 1996, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, an Operating Agreement, a Credit Card License and Receivable Sales Agreement, and a Servicemark License Agreement (collectively, the "MW Agreements") with Montgomery Ward. Under the MW Agreements, Montgomery Ward purchased 1,280,000 unregistered shares of common stock of the Company at $6.25 per share, which represented approximately 4.4% of the then issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, 59 60 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 and received warrants to purchase an additional 25 million shares of common stock of the Company. These warrants had exercise prices ranging from $6.50 to $17.00 per share, with an average exercise price of $9.16 per share (the "Warrants"). The value assigned to the Warrants of $17,500,000 was determined pursuant to an independent appraisal. On June 7, 1996, the Company signed a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding with Montgomery Ward pursuant to which the companies agreed to the expansion and restructuring of their ongoing operating and license agreements as well as the Company's acquisition of substantially all of the assets and assumption of certain obligations of Montgomery Ward Direct L.P. ("MWD"), a four year old catalog business. Effective July 27, 1996 the companies reached definitive agreements and closed the transaction in the third quarter ended October 31, 1996. Pursuant to the provisions of the agreements, the Company's sales promotion rights were expanded beyond television home shopping to include the full use of the service mark of Montgomery Ward for direct-mail catalogs and ancillary promotions. In addition, the strategic alliance between the companies had been restructured and amended such that (i) 18,000,000 warrants not immediately exercisable granted to Montgomery Ward in August 1995 and with exercise prices ranging from $7.00 - $17.00 were terminated in exchange for the issuance by the Company of 1,484,467 new immediately exercisable warrants exercisable at $0.01 per share and valued at $5.625 per warrant, which approximated the book value of the 18,000,000 warrants not immediately exercisable returned as of the date of the transaction, (ii) the Company issued 1,484,993 new immediately exercisable warrants, valued at $5.625 per warrant and exercisable at $0.01 per share, to Montgomery Ward as full consideration for the acquisition of approximately $4.0 million in net assets, representing substantially all of the assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of MWD, (iii) Montgomery Ward committed to provide $20 million in supplemental advertising support over a five-year period, (iv) the Montgomery Ward operating agreements and licenses were amended and expanded, as defined in the agreements, and extended to July 31, 2008 and (v) the Company issued to Montgomery Ward new immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 2.2 million shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share in exchange for 7,000,000 immediately exercisable warrants granted to Montgomery Ward in August 1995 which were exercisable at prices ranging from $6.50 - $6.75 per share. The fair value of the warrants approximated the book value of the warrants exchanged. The Operating Agreement has a twelve-year term and may be terminated under certain circumstances as defined in the agreement. Effective November 1, 1997, the Company restructured its operating agreement with Montgomery Ward, which governsgoverned the use of the Montgomery Ward name. In exchange for Montgomery Ward's return to ValueVision of warrants covering the purchase of 3,842,143 shares of ValueVision common stock (representing all remaining warrants held by Montgomery Ward), the Company ceded exclusive use of the Montgomery Ward name for catalog, mail order, catalog "syndications" and television shopping programming back to Montgomery Ward. Under the agreement, the Company has ceased the use of the Montgomery Ward name in all outgoing catalog, syndication, and mail order communication through March 31, 1998, with a wind down of incoming orders and customer service permitted after March 31, 1998. The agreement also includesincluded the 57 58 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 reduction of Montgomery Ward's minimum commitment to support ValueVision's cable television spot advertising purchases. Under the new terms, Montgomery Ward's commitment iswas reduced from $4 million to $2 million annually, and the time period was decreased from five years to three years effective November 1, 1997. In addition, the agreement limitslimited the Company to offer the Montgomery Ward credit card only in conjunction with its various television offers and subject to the normal approvals by the credit card grantor. The Company has accounted for the restructuring of the Operating Agreement as an exchange or disposition of assets at fair value, in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29. The return of the warrants, which were valued at approximately $19,211,000, representsrepresented consideration given by Montgomery Ward for the assets relinquished by the Company, which effectively include the remaining goodwill attributable to the acquisition of MWD, as well as a portion of the Montgomery Ward Operating Agreement and License asset (see Note 2). The warrants were valued at $5.00 per warrant, which represented 60 61 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 the fair market value of the Company's stock on October 22, 1997, the date on which ValueVision and Montgomery Ward reached agreement on the terms and consideration of the restructuring agreement and the date the transaction was effectively announced. The warrant return has beenwas reflected as a reduction in shareholders' equity for the fair value of the warrants, and the intangible asset amounts reflecting the assets sold back to Montgomery Ward have beenwere reduced accordingly to their remaining estimated fair values as determined through analysis of future cash flows and benefits to be received. The difference between the consideration given by the Company (the assets sold back to Montgomery Ward) and the consideration received (the warrants returned to the Company) was not material. The agreement also called for the repurchase by the Company of 1,280,000 shares of its common stock currently owned by Montgomery Ward, at a price of $3.80 per share. ThisThe repurchase was completed on January 15, 1998. Management does not believe that this restructuring will have any other material impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Montgomery Ward purchased approximately $1.8 million, $3.3 million and $4.2 million of advertising spot time on cable systems affiliated with the Company pursuant to cable affiliation agreements for the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Under the terms of the Credit Card License and Receivable Sales Agreement, the Company incurred $301,000, $1,123,000 and $596,000 of processing fees during fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, as a result of customers using Montgomery Ward/ValueVision credit cards. In addition, during fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectfully, the Company earned $135,000, $831,000 and $793,000 for administering and processing Montgomery Ward credit card applications. As of January 31, 19981999 and 1997,1998, the Company had $2,218,000$1,171,000 and $830,000$2,218,000 included in accounts receivable from Montgomery Ward for merchandise sales made on Montgomery Ward/Value Vision credit cards, advertising spot time acquired and administrative and processing fees, net of processing fees due Montgomery Ward for use of its credit card. 4. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS: MONTGOMERY WARD DIRECT As discussed further in Note 3, effective July 27, 1996, the Company, through VVDM, acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain obligations of MWD by issuing 1,484,993 vested warrants with an exercise price of $.01 per share to Montgomery Ward as full consideration for the acquisition of approximately $4.0 million in net assets of MWD. The value of the warrants issued in the acquisition of MWD was based on the market price of the Company's common stock during the period in which the agreement was reached (i.e., signing of the letter of intent) to undertake the relevant transaction which the Company believes is indicative of the fair value of the acquired business. The Company's acquisition of MWD was for an aggregate purchase price of $8,497,000, which included approximately $4.0 million in net assets, including acquired cash of $5,764,000. Acquisition related costs approximated $144,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and 58 59 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 accordingly, the net assets of MWD were recorded at their estimated fair values. The allocation is summarized as follows: Cash.............................................Cash.................................................. $ 5,764,000 Inventories......................................Inventories........................................... 9,140,000 Other current assets.............................assets.................................. 2,861,000 Property and equipment...........................equipment................................ 557,000 Intangible assets................................assets..................................... 4,531,000 Liabilities assumed..............................assumed................................... (14,356,000) ------------ $ 8,497,000 ============
61 62 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired was $4,531,000, had been recorded as goodwill and other intangible assets in the accompanying balance sheet and was being amortized on a straight-line basis over 5-12 years. As discussed in Notes 2 and 3, intangible assets recorded in connection with this acquisition were reduced to zero in fiscal 1998 in connection with the restructuring transaction with Montgomery Ward. The operating results of MWD have been included in the fiscal 1997 consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition. Unaudited pro forma consolidated net sales of the Company for the yearsyear ended January 31, 1997, and 1996, as if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the respective periods were $194,284,000 and $240,850,000 respectively.year was $194,284,000. Unaudited pro forma net income was $17,151,000, or $.52 per diluted share, in fiscal 1997 and $4,341,000, or $.14 per diluted share, in fiscal 1996.1997. Such pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of what the actual consolidated results of operations would have been had the acquisition been effective at the beginning of the respective periods.fiscal 1997. In fiscal 1998, the Company changed the name of the MWD catalog to HomeVisions. See additional discussion in Note 5 regarding the fiscal 1999 shutdown of the HomeVisions operations. BEAUTIFUL IMAGES, INC. On October 22, 1996, the Company, through VVDM, acquired all of the outstanding shares of BII, a manufacturer and direct marketer of women's foundation undergarments and other women's apparel. The Company paid $4,253,000 in cash, which included acquired cash of $423,000, $500,000 relating to a non- compete agreement and acquisition costs of approximately $75,000, and assumed certain obligations totaling $109,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets purchased and the liabilities assumed based upon estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $3,310,000, of which $2,810,000 has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years, and $500,000 assigned to the non-compete agreement, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the 6 year6-year term of the agreement. The operating results of BII have been included in the fiscal 1997 consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects were not significant. CATALOG VENTURES, INC. Effective November 1, 1996, the Company, through VVDM, acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain obligations of Catalog Ventures, Inc. and Mitchell & Webb, Inc. ("Webb"), two direct marketing companies which together publish five consumer specialty catalogs. The Company paid $7,369,000 in cash which included acquired cash of $1,465,000 and acquisition costs of approximately $100,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $1,953,000, and has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. The 59 60 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 operating results of CVI have been included in the fiscal 1997 consolidated statement of operations from the date of the acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects were not significant. BROADCAST STATIONS During the first quarter of fiscal 1995, the Company completed the acquisitions of three full power television broadcast stations serving the Washington D.C. ("WVVI"); Houston, Texas ("KVVV"); and Cleveland -- Akron, Ohio ("WAKC") Areas of Dominant Influence ("ADI"). On December 28, 1994 the Company completed the acquisition of one full power television broadcast station serving the New York City ADI and licensed to Bridgeport, Connecticut ("WHAI"). The aggregate purchase price for the four stations was approximately $22,374,000 in cash, Company common stock and non-compete obligations. The 62 63 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the net assets of the four stations were recorded at their estimated values at the time of acquisition, as determined by independent appraisals. On March 15, 1996, the Company completed the acquisition of independent television station KBGE (TV), Channel 33 serving the Seattle-Tacoma, Washington market, for approximately $4.6 million including the assumption of certain debt obligations and acquisition related costs. This acquisition was completed in accordance with the terms of a five-year programming affiliation and financing agreement with the station which was signed on July 21, 1995. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company provided financing of up to $1,450,000 related to a working capital loan for channel operations. On April 11, 1996, the Company completed a second closing with respect to its acquisition of independent television station WVVI whereby the Company paid $800,000 to the former owner of WVVI as a final payment in exchange for not having to pay $1,600,000 in the event the "must carry" provisions of the 1992 Cable Act are upheld by a final decision. The Company had previously paid $4,050,000 to National Capital Christian Broadcasting, WVVI's former owners, at an initial closing on March 28, 1994. The $800,000 additional payment had been classified as excess purchase price and was amortized over 25 years on a straight-line basis. In addition, the Company received certain studio and production equipment from the former owner of WVVI, in lieu of a cash payment, for the balance outstanding under a secured convertible debenture in the face amount of $450,000. On March 31, 1997, the United States Supreme Court upheld the "must carry" provisions of the 1992 Cable Act and as a result, the Company paid an additional $1,600,000 in connection with its 1995 acquisition of television station KVVV(TV) in Houston, Texas upon a second closing. The additional payment has been classified as excess purchase price and is being amortized over 25 years on a straight-line basis. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects were not significant. The Company views and treats the acquisition of its television broadcast stations as a "purchase of assets" rather than as a purchase of a stand alone operating business unit. This treatment is due to the fact that planned revenues of acquired television broadcast stations do not constitute either a separate business of ValueVision or represent a significant portion of the Company's operating businesses. The Company has filed applications for nine additional full-power stations, all of which include multiple applicants, and expects to participate in FCC-permitted private auctions to determine the grantee. SALE OF BROADCAST STATIONS On February 28, 1996, the Company completed the sale of two television stations to Paxson Communications Corporation ("Paxson") for $40.0 million in cash plus the assumption of certain obligations. The stations sold were ABC affiliate WAKC (TV), Channel 23, licensed to Akron, Ohio, and independent station WHAI 60 61 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 (TV), Channel 43, licensed to Bridgeport, Connecticut. WAKC (TV) was acquired by the Company in April 1994 for approximately $6.0 million and WHAI (TV) was acquired by the Company in December 1994 for approximately $7.3 million. The net gain on the sale of these two television stations of approximately $27 million was recognized in the first fiscal quarter ended April 30, 1996. On July 31, 1997, the Company completed the sale of its television broadcast station, WVVI (TV) to Paxson for approximately $30 million in cash and the receipt of 1,197,892 shares of Paxson common stock valued at $11.92 per share as determined pursuant to an independent financial appraisal. Under the terms of the agreement, Paxson paid the Company $20 million in cash upon closing and was required to pay an additional $10 million to the Company as a result of the United States Supreme Court upholding the "must carry" provision of the 1992 Cable Act. WVVI (TV) was acquired by the Company in March 1994 for $4,850,000. The pre-tax gain recorded on the sale of the television station was approximately $38.9 million and was recognized in the second fiscal quarter ended July 31, 1997. 63 64 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 On February 27, 1998, the Company completed the sale of its television broadcast station KBGE-TV Channel 33, which serves the Seattle, Washington market, along with two of the Company's non-cable, low-power stations in Portland, Oregon and Indianapolis, Indiana and a minority interest in an entity which had applied for a new full-power station to Paxson for a total of approximately $35 million in cash. Under the terms of the agreement, Paxson paid the Company approximately $25 million upon closing and the remaining $10 million is to be paid when KBGE, which is currently operating at reduced power from downtown Seattle, is able to relocate its antenna and increase its transmitter power to a level at or near its licensed full power.payable by the first quarter of fiscal 2000. The Company will retain and continue to serve the Seattle market via its recently-launched low-power station K58DP-TV, which transmits from downtown Seattle. The pre-tax gain to be recorded on the first installment with respect to the sale of this television station is expected to bewas approximately $19.8 million and will bewas recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Management believes that sales of its television stations will not have a significant impact on the ongoing operations of the Company. 5. LOW-POWERRESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS: In the third quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company approved a restructuring plan and the effective divestiture of its HomeVisions catalog operations. The decision to restructure and divest HomeVisions was made primarily as a result of the continuing operating losses and deteriorating financial performance over the past year of the catalog's operations since Montgomery Ward's announcement of its bankruptcy filing in the summer of 1997. Operating losses for HomeVisions further increased as a result of the subsequent termination of HomeVisions' right to use the Montgomery Ward private label credit card in March 1998. As a result of the decision to divest HomeVisions, the Company mailed its last HomeVisions catalog in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 and effectively wound down the catalog operation as of January 31, 1999. In connection with the restructuring plan and divestiture of HomeVisions, the Company recorded a $2,950,000 restructuring and asset impairment charge in the third quarter ended October 31, 1998, consisting of the following components: - Write-down of advanced purchased, overstocked inventory totaling $1,450,000 purchased specifically for fourth quarter catalog drops which did not occur due to the decision to divest HomeVisions' operations in the third quarter of fiscal 1999. The write-down recorded was net of estimated remaining fiscal 1999 cost of sales and reflects inventories at various liquidation values. - Write-down of certain other assets totaling $944,000 to reflect such assets at their estimated net realizable value, based on the Company's determination that the assets were substantially impaired as a direct result of the decision to divest HomeVisions. The write-down included: $364,000 of capitalized catalog software made obsolete with no future economic benefit to the Company; $282,000 of capitalized catalog costs, net of remaining fiscal 1999 amortization, for which no catalog is to be produced nor future revenue to be recognized against; $223,000 of property and equipment to be disposed of, net of remaining fiscal 1999 depreciation, with no future economic benefit to the Company; and $75,000 relating to lost vendor purchase credits and other incremental costs. - Employee-related severance costs of $556,000 related to the termination of 17 merchandising and other administrative employees pursuant to a plan of termination announced in the third quarter of fiscal 1999. As of January 31, 1999, $256,000 of accrued severance costs had been paid out to employees. In connection with the decision to divest HomeVisions, ValueVision entered into an agreement to license and sell the exclusive marketing rights to the "HomeVisions" name and related customer list database to Direct Marketing Services, Inc. ("DMSI"), a direct-mail marketer and catalog distributor headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The Company recorded a $1,443,000 gain in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 related to the sale of these assets. 64 65 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 Net sales and operating results for HomeVisions for the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 were as follows (in thousands):
1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- Net sales.......................................... $18,862 $74,756 $43,755 Operating income (loss)............................ $(6,795) $(6,091) $ 1,202
6. LOW POWER TELEVISION STATIONS: The licensing of LPTV stations' transmission authority is regulated by the FCC through the Communications Act of 1934. LPTV construction permits and the licensing rights that result upon definitive FCC operating approval are awarded solely at the discretion of the FCC and are subject to periodic renewal requirements. As of January 31, 1998,1999, the Company held licenses for tentwelve LPTV stations, and had pending before the FCC an application to acquire an eleventh LPTV station from a former officer and shareholder of the Company for which an application has since been granted but the acquisition has not yet been consummated. The Company's President and Chief Operating Officer also holds a construction permit for an additional LPTV station in Richmond, Virginia. The Company has entered into an agreement with this permittee whereby the Company has the option to enter into a secured financing arrangement to support the construction of transmission equipment for the LPTV station and to provide its programming to the station. The agreement contains a fixed price purchase option of $5,000 in favor of the Company, effective 12 months from the FCC licensing date, as defined. Under the agreement this permittee could receive maximum annual programming fees of approximately $48,000. 61 62 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 6.stations. 7. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: COMMON STOCK The Company currently has authorized 100,000,000 shares of undesignated capital stock, of which approximately 26,780,77825,865,000 shares were issued and outstanding as Common Stock as of January 31, 1998.1999. The Board of Directors can establish new classes and series of capital stock by resolution without shareholder approval. WARRANTS As discussed further in Note 3, in fiscal 1996, the Company issued Montgomery Ward warrants to purchase 25 million shares of common stock of the Company, subject to adjustment, with exercise prices ranging from $6.50 to $17.00 per share, with an average price of $9.16 per share. In July 1996, in connection with the acquisition of MWD, the Company's strategic alliance with Montgomery Ward was restructured and amended whereby new immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 3,684,467 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share were issued to Montgomery Ward in exchange for the 25 million warrants held. In addition, the Company issued 1,484,993 new immediately exercisable warrants with a fair market value of $8,353,000 and exercisable at $.01 per share to Montgomery Ward as full consideration for the acquisition of MWD. See Note 3 for further discussion. In July 1996, the Company issued 199,097 new immediately exercisable warrants with a fair market value of $1,131,000 and exercisable at $.01 per share as a limited partnership investment contribution. In February 1997, vested warrants to purchase 1,526,414 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share and originally valued at $8,597,000, were exercised in full and their value was transferred to paid in capital. As discussed further in Note 3, in November 1997, 3,842,143 immediately exercisable warrants owned by Montgomery Ward at an exercise price of $.01 per share were exchanged and returned to the Company as consideration in the transaction relating to the restructuring of the Company's operating agreement with Montgomery Ward. In addition, the Company repurchased 1,280,000 shares of its common stock held by Montgomery Ward for aggregate consideration of approximately $4,505,000. UNDERWRITER OPTIONS In connection with the Company's fiscal 1992 initial public offering, the Company issued options to purchase up to an aggregate 72,000 units for $5.23 per unit. Each unit consisted of three shares of common 65 66 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 stock, three Class A Warrants and one-quarter of a Class B Warrant, subject to adjustment pursuant to antidilution provisions as defined. At the beginning of fiscal 1997, 20,400 units had been previously exercised. During the year ended January 31, 1997, options to purchase the remaining 51,600 units were exercised in full and resulted in the issuance of 509,550 shares of common stock. The Company received proceeds of approximately $1,051,000 relating to this exercise. No unit purchase options were exercised in fiscal 1996. The underwriters of the fiscal 1994 common stock offering were given options to purchase up to 400,000 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $16.41 per share, subject to certain specified adjustments, as defined, exercisable until November 15, 1998. No underwriterThese options were exercisedexpired unexercised in fiscal 1998, 1997 or 1996. 62 63 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 19971999. STOCK OPTIONS The Company has adopted an incentive stock option plan ("the 1990 Plan"), as amended, which provides for the grant of options to employees to purchase up to 2,150,000 shares of the Company's common stock. In addition to options granted under the 1990 Plan, the Company has also granted non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of the Company=sCompany's common stock to current and former directors, a consultant and certain employees. The Company also adopted an executive incentive stock option plan ("the 1994 Executive Plan") which provides for the grant of options to certain executives to purchase up to 2,400,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The exercise price for options granted under the 1990 Plan and the 1994 Executive Plan are determined by the stock option committee of the Board of Directors, but shall not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The options=options' maximum term may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. Options are exercisable in whole or in installments, as determined by the stock option committee, and are generally exercisable in annual installments of 20% to 33% commencing one year after grant. The exercise price of the non-qualified stock options equaled the market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant and the maximum term of such options does not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. The Company accounts for its stock options under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"). Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Had compensation cost related to these options been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards granted in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company=sCompany's net income and net income per share would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:
1999 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- Net income: As reported.........................reported............................ $4,639,000 $18,104,000 $18,090,000 $11,020,000 Pro forma...........................forma.............................. 3,729,000 17,805,000 17,794,000 10,775,000 Net income per share: Basic: As reported......................... $0.57 $0.57 $0.38$ 0.18 $ 0.57 $ 0.57 Pro forma........................... 0.14 0.56 0.56 0.38 Diluted: As reported......................... $0.57 $0.56 $0.38$ 0.18 $ 0.57 $ 0.56 Pro forma........................... 0.15 0.57 0.56 0.37
66 67 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 Because the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting has not been applied to options granted prior to February 1, 1995, the resulting pro forma compensation cost may not be representative of that to be expected in future years. The weighted average fair values of options granted were as follows:
1994 1990 1994EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE STOCK NON-QUALIFIED EXECUTIVESTOCK OPTION OPTION PLAN STOCK OPTIONS PLAN STOCK OPTIONS OPTION PLAN --------------- ------------- --------------------------- Fiscal 1999 grants...................... $2.90 $ -- $2.21 Fiscal 1998 grants..................... $2.49 $2.77 $2.14grants...................... 2.49 2.77 2.14 Fiscal 1997 grants.....................grants...................... 3.36 3.46 -- Fiscal 1996 grants..................... 3.20 1.78 --
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in fiscal 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 6.0,5.0, 6.0 and 6.26.0 percent; expected volatility of 56, 47, 46 and 4546 percent; and expected lives of 7.5 years. Dividend yields were not used in the fair value computations as the Company has never declared or paid dividends on its common stock and currently intends to retain earnings for use in operations. 63 64 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 A summary of the status of the Company's stock option plan as of January 31, 1999, 1998, 1997, and 19961997 and changes during the years then ended is presented below:
1990 1994 INCENTIVE WEIGHTED NON- WEIGHTED EXECUTIVE WEIGHTED STOCK AVERAGE NON-QUALIFIEDQUALIFIED AVERAGE STOCK AVERAGE OPTION EXERCISE STOCK EXERCISE OPTION EXERCISE PLAN PRICE OPTIONS PRICE PLAN PRICE --------- -------- ---------------------- -------- --------- -------- Balance outstanding, January 31, 1995.... 1,191,336 $4.20 365,000 $3.821996................................. 1,501,836 $4.52 505,000 $4.55 1,500,000 $9.50 Granted................................ 344,322 5.50 190,000 5.08 -- -- Exercised.............................. (27,322) 2.90 (50,000) 1.25 -- -- Forfeited or canceled (6,500) 4.37 -- -- -- -- --------- ----- ------- ----- --------- ----- Balance outstanding, January 31, 1996.... 1,501,836 4.52 505,000 4.55 1,500,000 9.50 Granted................................Granted.............................. 151,000 5.74 325,000 5.62 -- -- Exercised..............................Exercised............................ (35,600) 2.79 -- -- -- -- Forfeited or canceled..................canceled................ (9,400) 4.84 -- -- -- -- --------- ----- ------- ----- --------- ----- Balance outstanding, January 31, 1997....1997................................. 1,607,836 4.67 830,000 4.97 1,500,000 9.50 Granted................................Granted.............................. 160,000 4.23 150,000 4.56 100,000 3.63 Exercised..............................Exercised............................ (84,667) 2.93 (25,000) 1.25 -- -- Forfeited or canceled..................canceled................ (223,333) 5.47 -- -- -- -- --------- ----- ------- ----- --------- ----- Balance outstanding, January 31, 1998....1998................................. 1,459,836 $4.604.60 955,000 $5.005.00 1,600,000 $9.139.13 Granted.............................. 650,266 5.13 -- -- 800,000 3.38 Exercised............................ (336,167) 4.15 (32,000) 5.50 (44,000) 3.63 Forfeited or canceled................ (435,500) 5.38 (28,000) 5.50 (356,000) 8.58 --------- ----- ------- ----- --------- ----- Balance outstanding, January 31, 1999................................. 1,338,435 $4.69 895,000 $4.97 2,000,000 $7.05 ========= ===== ======= ===== ========= ===== Options exercisable at: January 31, 1998.......................1999..................... 729,000 $4.24 585,000 $4.88 1,719,000 $7.65 ========= ===== ======= ===== ========= ===== January 31, 1998..................... 938,000 $4.37 538,000 $4.82 600,000 $9.50 ========= ===== ======= ===== ========= ===== January 31, 1997.......................1997..................... 971,000 $4.24 505,000 $4.55 450,000 $9.50 ========= ===== ======= ===== ========= ===== January 31, 1996....................... 759,000 $3.97 315,000 $4.20 300,000 $9.50 ========= ===== ======= ===== ========= =====
67 68 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 The following table summarizes information regarding stock options outstanding at January 31, 1998:1999:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING -------------------------------------------------OPTIONS EXERCISABLE ----------------------------------------- ---------------------- WEIGHTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING AVERAGE RANGE OF EXERCISE OPTIONS AVERAGEEXERCISE CONTRACTUAL LIFE OPTIONS EXERCISE OPTION TYPE EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING EXERCISE PRICE (YEARS) EXERCISABLE PRICE ----------- -------------------------------- ----------- ---------------------- ---------------- ----------- -------- Incentive:..................................... $1.00 - $2.53 165,336 $1.43 2.1 $3.88$4.88 894,935 $3.85 5.1 550,000 $3.70 $5.19 - $7.50 1,294,500 $5.00 5.3$8.44 443,500 $6.39 6.9 179,000 $5.88 --------- --------- $1.00 - $7.50 1,459,836 $4.60 4.9$8.44 1,338,435 $4.69 5.7 729,000 $4.24 ========= ========= Non-qualified:............................. $4.13 - $6.19 955,000 $5.00 5.3895,000 $4.97 4.4 585,000 $4.88 ========= OPTIONS EXERCISABLE ----------------------------- WEIGHTED OPTIONS AVERAGE OPTION TYPE EXERCISABLE EXERCISE PRICE ----------- ----------- -------------- Incentive:................... 165,000 $1.41 773,000 $5.00 ------- 938,000 $4.37 ======= Non-qualified:............... 538,000 $4.82 ================ Executive:.................. $3.38 800,000 $3.38 7.5 519,000 $3.38 $9.50 1,200,000 $9.50 7.5 1,200,000 $9.50 --------- --------- $3.38 - $9.50 2,000,000 $7.05 7.5 1,719,000 $7.65 ========= =========
STOCK OPTION TAX BENEFIT The exercise of certain stock options granted under the Company's stock option plan gives rise to compensation which is includable in the taxable income of the applicable employees and deductible by the Company for federal and state income tax purposes. Such compensation results from increases in the fair market value of the Company's common stock subsequent to the date of grant of the applicable exercised stock options and is not recognized as an expense for financial accounting purposes, as the options were originally granted at the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The related tax benefits are recorded as additional paid-in capital when realized, and totaled $731,000, $39,000 and $790,000 in fiscal 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. 64 65 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM In fiscal 1996, the Company established a stock repurchase program whereby the Company may repurchase shares of its common stock up to a maximum of $10 million, in the open market and through negotiated transactions, at prices and times deemed to be beneficial to the long-term interests of shareholders and the Company. In March 1997,June 1998, the Company's Board of Directors authorized an additional repurchase of up to $10$6 million of the Company's common stock. As of January 31, 1999, the Company was authorized to repurchase an aggregate of $26 million of its common stock of which approximately $21.6 million in stock had been repurchased. During fiscal 1999, the Company repurchased 1,327,000 common shares under the program for a total net cost of $4,292,000. During fiscal 1998, the Company repurchased 2,417,000 common shares under the program for a total cost of $10,458,000. During fiscal 1997, the Company repurchased 1,047,000 common shares for a total cost of $5,826,000. No shares were repurchased in fiscal 1996. 7.$5,825,000. 8. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS: In conjunction with the acquisition of WAKC in fiscal 1995, the Company entered into three covenant not-to-compete agreements with former employees and majority stockholders of WAKC involving aggregate consideration of $1,000,000 to be paid in five equal annual installments commencing in April 1995. Obligations under these non-compete agreements were initially reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at a present value of approximately $778,000 based upon an 8% imputed interest rate and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreements. The long-term and current portions of this obligation at January 31, 19981999 were $0 and $153,000, and $200,000, respectively. 68 69 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 The Company leases computer and telephone equipment under noncancelable capital leases and includes these assets in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At January 31, 1998,1999, the capitalized cost of leased equipment was approximately $539,000 and the related accumulated depreciation was approximately $245,000.$332,000. Future minimum lease payments for assets under capital leases at January 31, 19981999 are as follows:
FISCAL YEAR ----------- 1999...................................................... $242,000 2000......................................................2000..................................................... $ 225,000 2001......................................................2001..................................................... 76,000 ----------------- Total minimum lease payments.............................. 543,000payments............................. 301,000 Less: Amounts representing interest....................... (48,000) -------- 495,000interest...................... (17,000) --------- 284,000 Less: Current portion..................................... (211,000) --------portion.................................... (209,000) --------- Long-term capital lease obligation........................ $284,000 ========obligation....................... $ 75,000 =========
The Company has entered into a $600,000, 10 year note payable arrangement in connection with the purchase of land to be used infor the Company=sCompany's fulfillment operations. The note bears interest, payable in monthly installments, at 7.5% for the first five years and at prime interest thereafter until maturity. The principal amount matures and is payable in December 2006. The note is collateralized by the underlying related property. 65 66 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 8.9. INCOME TAXES: The Company records deferred taxes for differences between the financial reporting and income tax bases of certain assets and liabilities, computed in accordance with tax laws in effect at that time. The differences which give rise to deferred taxes were as follows:
JANUARY 31, -------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- Accruals and reserves not currently deductible for tax purposes...................................... $ 2,134,000 $ 2,579,000purposes........................................ $3,153,000 $2,134,000 Inventory capitalization............................capitalization.............................. 600,000 363,000 541,000 Deferred catalog costs..............................costs................................ (507,000) (766,000) (667,000) Basis differences in intangible assets..............assets................ (250,000) (575,000) 30,000 Net tax carryforwards............................... -- 198,000 Differences in depreciation lives and methods.......methods......... (517,000) (1,341,000) (1,237,000) DifferenceDifferences in investments and other items........... (1,238,000) (1,028,000) ----------- -----------items............ (21,000) 1,147,000 ---------- ---------- Net deferred tax asset (liability).................. $(1,423,000)asset................................ $2,458,000 $ 416,000 =========== ===========962,000 ========== ==========
The net deferred tax asset (liability) is classified as follows in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
JANUARY 31, ----------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- Current deferred taxes.............................. $ 447,000 $ 2,681,000taxes.................................. $1,807,000 $447,000 Noncurrent deferred taxes........................... (1,870,000) (2,265,000) ----------- -----------taxes............................... 651,000 515,000 ---------- -------- Net deferred tax asset (liability).................. $(1,423,000) $ 416,000 =========== ===========asset.................................. $2,458,000 $962,000 ========== ========
69 70 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 The provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following:
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1999 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- Current...................................Current................................. $ 4,590,000 $ 9,661,000 $11,766,000 $ 350,000 Deferred..................................Deferred................................ (1,738,000) 1,839,000 (166,000) (250,000) ----------- ----------- -------------------- $ 2,852,000 $11,500,000 $11,600,000 $ 100,000 =========== =========== ====================
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the statutory rates to the Company's effective tax rate is as follows:
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, --------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- Taxes at federal statutory rates................... 35.0%rates........................ 34.0% 35.0% 35.0% State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit..... 3.8% 4.1% 5.0% Effect of recognition of previously unrecorded deferred tax assets..............................benefit.......... 3.1 3.8 4.1 Amortization and other permanent items.................. 1.0 -- -- (39.1)% ---- ---- --------- Effective tax rate.................................rate...................................... 38.1% 38.8% 39.1% 0.9% ==== ==== =========
66 67 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 9.10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: CABLE AFFILIATION AGREEMENTS As of January 31, 1998,1999, the Company had entered into 23 to 7 year affiliation agreements with thirteentwelve multiple systems operators ("MSOs") which require each MSO to offer the Company's cable television home shopping programming on a full-time basis over their cable systems. Under certain circumstances, these cable television operators may cancel their agreements prior to expiration. The affiliation agreements provide that the Company will pay each MSO a monthly cable access fee and marketing support payment based upon the number of homes carrying the Company's television home shopping programming. For the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 1997 and 1996,1997, the Company paid approximately $19,494,000, $17,431,000, $15,182,000 and $12,078,000,$15,182,000, under these long-term cable affiliation agreements. The Company has entered into, and will continue to enter into, affiliation agreements with other cable television operators providing for full- or part-time carriage of the Company's television home shopping programming. Under certain circumstances the Company may be required to pay the cable operator a one time initial launch fee which is capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS The Company hashad entered into employment agreements with its former chief executive officer and chief operating officer which expireexpired on January 31, 1999. The employment agreements provideprovided that each officer, in addition to a base salary, be granted options to purchase 375,000 shares of common stock at $8.50 per share and 375,000 shares of common stock at $10.50 per share. The options were to vest and become exercisable at the earlier of the Company achieving certain net income goals, as defined, or in September 2003. The aggregate commitmentAs of January 31, 1999, 1,200,000 of these options were exercisable and 300,000 options were forfeited. Payments for future base compensation for these former officers athas been terminated as of January 31, 1998 was $700,000.1999. In addition, the Company has entered into employment agreements with a number of officers of the Company and its subsidiaries for terms ranging from 24 to 36 months. These agreements specify, among other things, the term and duties of employment, compensation and benefits, termination of employment (including 70 71 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 for cause, which would reduce the Company's total obligation under these agreements), severance payments and non-disclosing and non-compete restrictions. The aggregate commitment for future base compensation at January 31, 19981999 was approximately $2,592,000.$5,266,000. OPERATING LEASE COMMITMENTS The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Property and equipment covered by such operating lease agreements include the Company's main corporate office and warehousing facility, offices and warehousing facilities at subsidiary locations, satellite transponder and certain tower site locations. Future minimum lease payments at January 31, 19981999 were as follows:
FISCAL YEAR AMOUNT ----------- ------ 1999............................................... $4,023,000 2000............................................... 3,711,000 2001............................................... 3,393,000 2002............................................... 2,329,000 20032000.................................................... $3,978,000 2001.................................................... 2,786,000 2002.................................................... 2,372,000 2003.................................................... 2,270,000 2004 and thereafter................................ 9,030,000thereafter..................................... 6,679,000
67 68 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 Total lease expense under such agreements was approximately $4,145,000 in 1999, $4,227,000 in 1998, and $4,222,000 in 1997, and $3,348,000 in 1996.1997. RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN During fiscal 1995, the Company implemented a qualified 401(k) retirement savings plan covering substantially all employees. The plan allows the Company's employees to make voluntary contributions to the>the plan. The Company's contribution, if any, is determined annually at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Starting in January 1999, the Company has elected to make matching contributions to the plan. The Company will match $.25 for every $1.00 contributed by eligible participants up to a maximum of 6% of eligible compensation. The Company made plan contributions totaling $5,800 during fiscal 1999. There were no Company contributions made to the plan in fiscal 1998 1997 or 1996. 10.1997. 11. LITIGATION: In December 1997, the Company was named in a lawsuit filed by Time Warner Cable against Bridgeways Communications Corporation ("Bridgeways") and the Company alleging, among other things, tortious interference with contractual and business relations and breach of contract. According to the complaint, Bridgeways and Time Warner Cable havehad been in a dispute since 1993 regarding Bridgeways' attempt to assert "must carry" rights with respect to television station WHAI-TV in the New York City Area of Dominant Influence.Designated Market Area. ValueVision purchased television station WHAI-TV from Bridgeways in 1994 and subsequently sold it in 1996. ValueVision and Time Warner Cable entered into cable affiliation agreement in 1995 pursuant to which ValueVision agreed not to assert "must carry" rights with respect to television station WHAI-TV and pursuant to which ValueVision's programming is currently carried by Time Warner Cable in approximately 4.2 million full-time equivalent cable households. The complaint seeks unspecified damagesOn December 23, 1998 the Company announced that it settled the lawsuit filed by Time Warner Cable. Under the terms of the settlement, ValueVision paid Time Warner Cable $7.0 million in cash which was recognized by ValueVision in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, resulting in an after tax charge of approximately $4.3 million. In settling this matter, ValueVision did not admit any wrongdoing or liability. ValueVision, however, determined to enter into this settlement to avoid the uncertainty and for the courtcosts of litigation, 71 72 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 as well as to declare theavoid disruption of its relationship with a key business partner providing a substantial portion of ValueVision's program distribution. ValueVision also announced that it has renewed its cable affiliation agreement betweenwith Time Warner Cable and ValueVision null and void. The Company is confident that it remainsfor an additional five-year term, expiring in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the cable affiliation agreementJanuary 30, 2007, and that it has been inappropriately named in this lawsuit involving Time Warner Cable and Bridgeways. The Company claims that the lawsuit is completely without merit, planshas agreed to defend it vigorously, and believes that the ultimate disposition of this legal proceeding will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or future results of operations. However, if Time Warner Cable werelaunch ValueVision's programming full-time to prevail under the Complaint, such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and/or costs of operations to the extent it jeopardized access to, or increased the cost of access to, these 4.4 million full-time equivalent households, which represent approximately 38% of the full-time equivalent households to which the Company currently has access.its Staten Island, New York cable subscribers. In January 1994, the Company proposed an acquisition of National Media Corporation ("National Media"). In February 1994, the Companyand announced a tender offer for a majority of the outstanding shares of National Media.Media Corporation ("National Media"). In March 1994, the Company and National Media entered into a Merger Agreement and the Company modified the terms of its tender offer. In April 1994, the Company terminated its tender offer and the Merger Agreement with National Media asserting inaccurate representations and breach of warranties by National Media, and based upon adverse developments concerning National Media. Litigation challenging the Company's termination of the tender offer and Merger Agreement was subsequently filed by National Media and its former chief executive officer and president. In addition, shareholders of National Media filed four purported class action lawsuits against the Company and certain officers of the Company. Each of these suits alleged deception and manipulative practices by the Company in connection with the tender offer and Merger Agreement. In fiscal 1996, the Company, National Media and National Media's former chief executive officer and president agreed to dismiss all claims, to enter into joint operating agreements involving telemarketing and post-production capabilities, and to enter into an international joint venture agreement. Under the agreement, the Company received ten-year warrants, which vest over three years, to purchase 500,000 shares of National 68 69 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 Media's common stock at a price of $8.865 per share. In November 1996, the Company and National Media amended their agreement by providing for the additional payment by the Company to National Media of $1.2 million as additional exercise price for the warrants. Aswarrants, which has been paid in full as of January 31, 1998, $800,000 has been paid with a final installment of $400,000 to be paid on September 1, 1998.1999. See Note 15 for additional discussion regarding these warrants. In March 1997, the court gave final approval to a $1.0 million settlement, which was paid by the Company from insurance proceeds, in the matter of the class action suit initiated by certain shareholders of National Media. During the year ended January 31, 1996, the Company recorded a provision of $617,000 for estimated costs associated with settling the National Media shareholder class action suit. In addition to the litigation noted above, the Company is involved from time to time in various other claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of Management, the claims and suits individually and in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations or consolidated financial statements. 11.12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS: At January 31, 19981999 and 1997,1998, the Company had approximately $960,000$1,059,000 and $591,000,$960,000, respectively, of notes receivable from certain former officers of the Company. These notes range in the principal amount of $10,000 to $500,000, bear interest at 5.6% to 6.8%, and withhave payment terms ranging from due on demand to November 2002. The notes have been reflected as a reduction of shareholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as the notes are partially collateralized by shares of the Company's common stock owned by the former officers. 6972 7073 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 AND 1997 12.13. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Supplemental cash flow information and noncash investing and financing activities were as follows:
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1999 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- Supplemental cash flow information: Interest paid.......................................paid........................................ $ 107,000 $ 89,000 $ 83,000 $ 69,000 ===================== =========== =========== Income taxes paid...................................paid.................................... $3,889,000 $11,482,000 $10,051,000 $ -- ===================== =========== =========== Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities: Reduction of Montgomery Ward operating license asset and other assets in exchange for the return of warrants.........................................warrants.......................................... $ -- $19,211,000 $ -- $ -- ===================== =========== =========== Receipt of 1,197,892 shares of Paxson Communications Corporation common stock as partial consideration from the sale of a broadcast television station.....station... $ -- $14,285,000 $ -- $ -- ===================== =========== =========== Issuance of 1,484,993 warrants in connection with the acquisition of Montgomery Ward Direct, L.P..........L.P. ...... $ -- $ -- $ 8,353,000 $ -- ===================== =========== =========== Issuance of 199,097 warrants as part of a long-term investment contribution.............................contribution........................... $ -- $ -- $ 1,131,000 $ -- ===================== =========== =========== Issuance of note payable in connection with the purchase of land.................................... $ -- $ 600,000 $ -- =========== =========== =========== Issuance of warrants to Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated........................................ $ -- $ -- $17,500,000 =========== =========== =========== Receipt of a capital distribution from an investment in a limited partnership............................land.................................. $ -- $ -- $ 2,744,000 ===========600,000 ========== =========== ===========
13. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT: The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards14. SEGMENT DISCLOSURES AND RELATED INFORMATION: In fiscal 1999, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" ("SFAS(SFAS No. 131") in June 1997.131). SFAS No. 131 requires that public business enterprises reportthe disclosure of certain information about operating segments in annual financial statements. The Company's reportable segments are based on the Company's method of internal reporting, which generally segregates the strategic business units into two segments: electronic media, consisting primarily of the Company's television home shopping business, and print media, whereby merchandise is sold to consumers through direct-mail catalogs and other direct marketing 73 74 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 solicitations. Segment information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of January 31 and included in the consolidated statements of operations for the years then ended is as follows:
ELECTRONIC PRINT YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, (IN THOUSANDS) MEDIA MEDIA CORPORATE TOTAL -------------------------------------- ---------- ----- --------- ----- 1999 Revenues........................................... $148,198 $ 55,530 $ -- $203,728 Operating loss..................................... (3,305) (5,264) -- (8,569) Depreciation and amortization...................... 3,970 1,029 -- 4,999 Interest income, net............................... 2,724 180 -- 2,904 Income taxes....................................... 4,823 (1,971) -- 2,852 Net income (loss).................................. 7,870 (3,231) -- 4,639 Identifiable assets................................ 107,385 19,941 14,444(a) 141,770 Capital expenditures............................... 1,339 226 -- 1,565 ------------------------------------------------- 1998 Revenues........................................... $106,571 $111,411 $ -- $217,982 Operating loss..................................... (7,132) (3,843) -- (10,975) Depreciation and amortization...................... 5,350 1,627 -- 6,977 Interest income, net............................... 1,817 299 -- 2,116 Income taxes....................................... 13,482 (1,982) -- 11,500 Net income (loss).................................. 21,076 (2,972) -- 18,104 Identifiable assets................................ 70,314 38,460 26,505(a) 135,279 Capital expenditures............................... 3,166 377 -- 3,543 ------------------------------------------------- 1997 Revenues........................................... $ 99,419 $ 60,059 $ -- $159,478 Operating income (loss)............................ (4,687) 2,047 -- (2,640) Depreciation and amortization...................... 5,357 639 -- 5,996 Interest income, net............................... 3,755 157 -- 3,912 Income taxes....................................... 10,750 850 -- 11,600 Net income......................................... 16,820 1,270 -- 18,090 Identifiable assets................................ 125,385 37,797 4,904(a) 168,086 Capital expenditures............................... 8,882 55 5,428(b) 14,365 -------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------- (a) Corporate assets consists of long-term investment assets not directly assignable to a business segment. (b) Relates to initial capital expenditures for the Company's warehouse and requires selected information in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 131 and will adopt the disclosure requirements in fiscal 1999 when required. 14.distribution facility. 15. NATIONAL MEDIA CORPORATION PROPOSED MERGER:CORPORATION: On January 5, 1998, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger (the "Merger Agreement"), by and among the Company, National Media Corporation ("National Media") and Quantum Direct Corporation, formerly known as V-L Holdings Corp. ("Quantum Direct"), a newly-formed Delaware corporation. National Media Corporation is a publicly-held direct marketer of consumer products through the use of direct response transactional television programming, known as infomercials, and currently makes its programming available to more than 370 million television households in more than 70 countries worldwide. If the mergers (the "Mergers") contemplated by the Merger Agreement were to be 70 71 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1998 AND 1997 consummated, the Company and National Media would have become wholly-owned subsidiaries of Quantum Direct, with each outstanding share of the Company's common stock being converted into 1.19 shares of common stock in Quantum Direct and each outstanding share of common stock of National Media, being converted into one share of common stock in Quantum Direct. Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to loan to National Media, pursuant to a Demand Promissory Note, up to an aggregate of $10.0 million, $7.0 million of which was advanced upon signing of the Demand Note on January 5, 1998 and the remaining $3.0 million of which has subsequently been advanced. The Loan proceeds have been used by National Media for various purposes, including the funding of accounts receivable, inventory and media purchases. The Loan bears interest at prime rate plus 1.5% per annum and is due on the earlier of January 1, 1999 or upon termination of the Merger Agreement in certain circumstances. In the event National Media is unable to repay the Loan when due, the Company may elect to receive payment in shares of National Media's common stock at the then present market value. In consideration for providing the Loan, National Media issued to the Company warrants to acquire 250,000 shares of National Media's common stock with an exercise price per share equal to $2.74. The warrants are exercisable until the earlier of (i) January 5, 2003 and (ii) the occurrence of one of the following termination events: (x) the consummation of the Merger or (y) the termination by National Media of the Merger Agreement, if such termination results from a breach of a covenant by the Company or in the event the Company's shareholders do not approve the Merger Agreement; provided, however, that if, within 75 days after the termination event described in clause (y) above, National Media has not repaid the Loan in full or if during such 75 days, National Media defaults under its obligations pursuant to the Loan, no termination event will be deemed to have occurred and the warrants shall remain exercisable. Consummation of the Mergers is subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of a number of conditions, including, but not limited to: (i) approval by holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of National Media's common stock and ValueVision common stock; (ii) redemption of National Media's Series C Preferred Stock; (iii) the receipt of certain regulatory and other approvals, including those from the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communication Commission; and (iv) not more than 5% of the holders of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common stock shall have made demands and given the notices required under Minnesota law to assert dissenters' appraisal rights. 15. UNAUDITED SUBSEQUENT EVENT: On April 8, 1998, it was announced that the Company received preliminary notification from holders of more than 5% of the Company's common stock that they intended to exercise their dissenter's rights with respect to the proposed merger of the Company and National Media. TheMedia and the Company also reported that it had advised National Media that it doesdid not intend to waive the Merger Agreement condition to closing requiring that holders of not more than 5% of the shares of the CompanyCompany's common stock have demanded their dissenter's rights. On June 2, 1998, the Company announced that attempts to renegotiate new, mutually acceptable terms and conditions regarding a transaction with National Media were unsuccessful and the Merger Agreement was 74 75 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 terminated. The Company had incurred approximately $2,350,000 of acquisition related costs and wrote off these amounts in the second quarter of fiscal 1999. Concurrently with the execution of the proposed Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to loan to National Media, had special meetingspursuant to a Demand Promissory Note, up to an aggregate of $10.0 million, $7.0 million of which was advanced upon signing of the Demand Note on January 5, 1998, with the remaining $3.0 million subsequently advanced in fiscal 1999. The loan proceeds were used by National Media for various purposes, including the funding of accounts receivable, inventory and media purchases. The loan included interest at the prime rate plus 1.5% per annum and was due on the earlier of January 1, 1999 or upon termination of the Merger Agreement in certain circumstances. In consideration for providing the Loan, National Media issued to the Company warrants to acquire 250,000 shares of National Media's common stock at an exercise price of $2.74 per share and amended the exercise price of previously issued warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock from $8.865 per share to $2.74 per share. In December 1998, National Media repaid the $10 million Demand Note, plus accrued interest, and the Company exercised warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of National Media common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $3,255,000. During fiscal 1999, the Company sold 460,000 shares of National Media common stock and recognized a $2,972,000 gain on the sale. In addition, included in fiscal 1999 earnings is a $1,350,000 unrealized holding gain related to the remaining 290,000 National Media shares held by the Company. These shares are classified as "trading securities" in the accompanying January 31, 1999 consolidated balance sheet, as it is the Company's intent to sell these securities in the near future. 16. UNAUDITED SUBSEQUENT EVENT: On March 8, 1999, the Company entered into a strategic alliance with the National Broadcasting Company, Inc. ("NBC") and G.E. Capital Equity Investments, Inc. ("GE Capital"). Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, NBC and GE Capital have agreed to jointly acquire an approximate 19.9% beneficial ownership interest in the Company (consisting of 5,339,500 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, and a warrant to acquire 1,450,000 shares of Common Stock (the "Distribution Warrant") under the "Distribution and Marketing Agreement" discussed below) for aggregate consideration of approximately $56.0 million (or approximately $8.29 per share) representing approximately $44.0 million for the Preferred Stock and approximately $12.0 million upon exercise of the Distribution Warrant. In addition, the Company will issue NBC and GE Capital a warrant to increase their potential aggregate equity stake to 39.9%, subject to approval of the Company's shareholders scheduled("Shareholder Approval"). NBC will also have the exclusive right to negotiate on April 14,behalf of the Company for the distribution of its television home shopping service. INVESTMENT AGREEMENT Pursuant to the Investment Agreement by and between the Company and GE Capital dated March 8, 1999 (the "Investment Agreement"), the Company will sell to GE Capital 5,339,500 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value (the "Preferred Stock") for an aggregate of $44,265,000 (or approximately $8.29 per share). The Preferred Stock is convertible into an equal number of shares of the Company's Common Stock, $.01 par value ("Common Stock"), subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, has a mandatory redemption on the 10th anniversary of its issuance or upon a "change of control" at its stated value ($8.29 per share), participates in dividends on the same basis as the Common Stock and has a liquidation preference over the Common Stock and any other junior securities. So long as NBC or GE Capital is entitled to designate a nominee to the Board of Directors (the "ValueVision Board") of the Company (see discussion under "Shareholder Agreement" below), the holders of the Preferred Stock shall be entitled to a separate class vote on the directors subject to nomination by NBC and GE Capital. 75 76 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 During such period of time, such holders will not be entitled to vote in the election of any other directors, but will be entitled to vote on all other matters put before shareholders of the Mergers.Company (including on the matter involving approval of the Investment Warrant described below) on an as converted basis. Consummation of the sale of 3,739,500 shares of the Preferred Stock (the "Initial Closing") is subject to clearance of the transaction with the Federal Trade Commission (the "Governmental Clearance"), and with respect to approximately 1.6 million shares of the Preferred Stock, is subject to Shareholder Approval. The Federal Trade Commission notified the Company on April 5, 1999 that it had granted the Company early termination with respect to the 30 day waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"). In light of this development, the receiptCompany expects that the closing of the dissenters' notice,sale of the companies mutually3,739,500 shares of Preferred Stock not subject to shareholder approval, the Investment Warrant and the Distribution Warrant will take place during the week of April 12, 1999. Closing on the sale of the remaining shares of Preferred Stock and exercisability of the Investment Warrant is subject to Shareholder Approval. The Investment Agreement may be terminated by mutual consent or if the Initial Closing is not consummated by August 31, 1999. The Investment Agreement also provides that the Company will issue GE Capital a common stock purchase warrant (the "Investment Warrant") to acquire the number of shares of the Common Stock that would result in the combined beneficial ownership by GE Capital and NBC of 39.9% of the Company at the time of exercise subject to certain limitations set forth in the Investment Warrant. The Investment Warrant is immediately exercisable, has a term of 5 years from the date of issuance and its exercise price during the first two years of the term of the Investment Warrant is the greater of (i) the 45-day average closing price of the underlying Common Stock ending on the trading day prior to exercise, (ii) the 150-day average closing price of the underlying Common Stock ending on the trading day prior to exercise, or (iii) $12 per share, and during the last three years of the term of the Investment Warrant is the greater of (i) the 45-day average closing price of the underlying Common Stock ending on the trading day prior to the exercise or (ii) $15 per share. Issuance of the Investment Warrant and approximately 1.6 million shares of the Preferred Stock (the "Second Closing"), in addition to obtaining the Governmental Clearance noted above, is also subject to Shareholder Approval. SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, upon closing of the sale of the Preferred Stock, the Company and GE Capital will enter into a Shareholder Agreement (the "Shareholder Agreement") providing for certain corporate governance and standstill matters. The Shareholder Agreement (together with the Certificate of Designation of the Preferred Stock) provides that GE Capital and NBC will be entitled to designate nominees for an aggregate of 2 out of 7 board seats so long as their aggregate beneficial ownership is at least equal to 50% (or 75% if Shareholder Approval is not obtained) of their initial beneficial ownership, and 1 out of 7 board seats so long as their aggregate beneficial ownership is at least 10% of the "adjusted outstanding shares of Common Stock" (or 50% of their initial beneficial ownership if Shareholder Approval is not obtained). GE Capital and NBC have also agreed to postponevote their respective shareholder meetings while the companies attempt to negotiate a restructuringshares of Common Stock in favor of the Mergers that is acceptableCompany's nominees to eachthe ValueVision Board in certain circumstances. All committees of the companiesValueVision Board will include a proportional number of directors nominated by GE Capital and NBC. The Shareholder Agreement also requires the consent of GE Capital prior to the Company entering into any substantial agreements with certain restricted parties (broadcast networks and internet portals in certain limited circumstances, as defined), as well as taking any of the following actions: (i) issuance of more than 15% of the total voting shares of the Company in any 12 month period (25% in any 24 month period), (ii) payment of quarterly dividends in excess of 5% of the Company's market capitalization (or repurchases and redemption of Common Stock with certain exceptions), (iii) entry by the Company into any business not ancillary, complementary or reasonably related to the Company's current business, (iv) 76 77 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 acquisitions (including investments and joint ventures) or dispositions exceeding the greater of $35.0 million or 10% of the Company's total market capitalization, or (v) incurrence of debt exceeding the greater of $40.0 million or 30% of the Company's total capitalization. Pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement, so long as GE Capital and NBC have the right to name at least one nominee to the ValueVision Board, the Company will provide them with certain monthly, quarterly and annual financial reports and budgets. In addition, the Company has agreed not to take actions which would cause the Company to be in breach of or default under any of its material contracts (or otherwise require a consent thereunder) as a result of acquisitions of the Common Stock by GE Capital or NBC. The Company is also prohibited from taking any action that would cause any ownership interest of certain FCC regulated entities from being attributable to GE Capital, NBC or their affiliates. The Shareholder Agreement provides that during the Standstill Period (as defined in the best interestShareholder Agreement), and with certain limited exceptions, GE Capital and NBC shall be prohibited from: (i) any asset/business purchases from the Company in excess of their shareholders. As10% of the total fair market value of the Company's assets, (ii) increasing their beneficial ownership above 39.9% of the Company's shares, (iii) making or in any way participating in any solicitation of proxies, (iv) depositing any securities of the Company in a voting trust, (v) forming, joining, or in any way becoming a member of a 13D Group with respect to any voting securities of the Company, (vi) arranging any financing for, or providing any financing commitment specifically for, the purchase of any voting securities of the Company, (vii) otherwise acting, whether alone or in concert with others, to seek to propose to the Company any tender or exchange offer, merger, business combination, restructuring, liquidation, recapitalization or similar transaction involving the Company, or nominating any person as a director of the Company who is not nominated by the then incumbent directors, or proposing any matter to be voted upon by the shareholders of the Company. If during the Standstill Period any inquiry has been made regarding a "takeover transaction" or "change in control" which has not been rejected by the ValueVision Board, or the ValueVision Board pursues such a transaction, or engages in negotiations or provides information to a third party and the ValueVision Board has not resolved to terminate such discussions, then GE Capital or NBC may propose to the Company a tender offer or business combination proposal. In addition, unless GE Capital and NBC beneficially own less than 5% or more than 90% of the adjusted outstanding shares of Common Stock, GE Capital and NBC shall not sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any securities of the Company except for transfers: (i) to certain affiliates who agree to be bound by the provisions of the Shareholder Agreement, (ii) which have been consented to by the Company, (iii) pursuant to a third party tender offer, provided that no shares of Common Stock may be transferred pursuant to this clause (iv) to the extent such shares were acquired upon exercise of the Investment Warrant on or after the date hereof, National Mediaof commencement of such third party tender offer or the public announcement by the offeror thereof or that such offeror intends to commence such third party tender offer, (v) pursuant to a merger, consolidation or reorganization to which the Company is a party, (vi) in a bona fide public distribution or bona fide underwritten public offering, (vii) pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act, or (viii) in a private sale or pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act; provided that, in the case of any transfer pursuant to clause (vi) or (viii), such transfer does not result in, to the knowledge of the transferor after reasonable inquiry, any other person acquiring, after giving effect to such transfer, beneficial ownership, individually or in the aggregate with such person's affiliates, of more than 10% of the adjusted outstanding shares of the Common Stock. The Standstill Period will terminate on the earliest to occur of (i) the 10 year anniversary of the Shareholder Agreement, (ii) the entering into by the Company of an agreement that would result in a "change in control" (subject to reinstatement), (iii) an actual "change in control," (iv) a third party tender offer (subject to reinstatement), and (v) six months after GE Capital and NBC can no longer designate any 77 78 VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998 nominees to the ValueVision Board. Following the expiration of the Standstill Period pursuant to clause (i) or (v) above (indefinitely in the case of clause (i) and two years in the case of clause (v)), GE Capital and NBC's beneficial ownership position may not exceed 39.9% of the Company on fully-diluted outstanding stock, except pursuant to issuance or exercise of any warrants or pursuant to a 100% tender offer for the Company. REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, at the Initial Closing, ValueVision and GE Capital will enter into a Registration Rights Agreement providing GE Capital, NBC and their affiliates and any transferees and assigns, an aggregate of four demand registrations and unlimited piggy-back registration rights. DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING AGREEMENT NBC and the Company are still attemptinghave entered into the Distribution and Marketing Agreement dated March 8, 1999 (the "Distribution Agreement") which provides that NBC shall have the exclusive right to negotiate a restructuringon behalf of the MergersCompany for the distribution of its home shopping television programming service. The agreement has a 10-year term and have not reschedule their respective special meetings. There can beNBC has committed to delivering an additional 10 million full time equivalent ("FTE") subscribers over the first 42 months of the term. In compensation for such services, the Company will pay NBC an annual fee of $1.5 million (increasing no assurance thatmore than 5% annually) and issue NBC the companiesDistribution Warrant. The exercise price of the Distribution Warrant is approximately $8.29 per share and vests 200,000 shares immediately, with the remainder of the Distribution Warrant vesting 125,000 shares annually over the 10-year term of the Distribution Agreement. The Distribution Warrant is exercisable for five years after vesting. Assuming certain performance criteria above the 10 million FTE homes are met, NBC will be ableentitled to successfully negotiateadditional warrants to acquire Common Stock. The Company is seeking shareholder ratification of the issuance of these additional warrants, although the issuance and exercise of such warrants are not conditioned upon obtaining such approval. The Company has a restructuring,right to terminate the Distribution Agreement after the twenty-fourth, thirty-sixth and forty-second month anniversary if NBC is unable to meet the performance targets. If terminated by the Company in such circumstance, the unvested portion of the Distribution Warrant will expire. In addition, the Company will be entitled to a $2.5 million payment from NBC if the Company terminates the Distribution Agreement as a result of NBC's failure to meet the 24 month performance target. If prior to the Company's shareholder vote, the Company receives a "material transaction proposal" or "takeover proposal", NBC has the right to (i) terminate the Distribution Agreement or (ii) increase the annual fee payable to NBC to the greater of $5.0 million or 10% of the Company's annual net profits (as defined in the Distribution Agreement). In addition, NBC may terminate the Distribution Agreement if the Company's shareholders do not approve the Investment Warrant or if negotiated, that such Mergers will be consummated. 71the Company enters into certain "significant affiliation" agreements or a transaction resulting in a "change of control." LETTER AGREEMENT The Company, GE Capital and NBC have also entered into a non-binding letter of intent dated March 8, 1999 providing for certain cooperative business activities which the parties contemplate pursuing, including but not limited to, development of a private label credit card, development of electronic commerce and other internet strategies, development of programming concepts for the Company and cross channel promotion. 78 7279 SCHEDULE II VALUEVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
COLUMN C COLUMN A COLUMN B ADDITIONS COLUMN D COLUMN E - ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------------------- ------------ --------------------- CHARGED TO BALANCES AT CHARGED TOCOSTS BALANCE AT BEGINNING AND END OF COSTS AND BALANCE ATOF YEAR EXPENSES OTHER DEDUCTIONS END OF YEAR ----------------------- ---------- ----- ---------- --------------------- FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999: Allowance for doubtful accounts...... $ 453,000 $ 1,934,000 $ -- $ (661,000) $1,726,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ========== Reserve for returns.................. $1,443,000 $60,295,000 $ -- $(59,447,000) $2,291,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ========== Restructuring-related severance accrual............................ $ -- $ 556,000 $ -- $ (256,000) $ 300,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ========== FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998: Allowance for doubtful accounts.....accounts...... $ 529,000 $ 561,000 $ -- $ (637,000)(1) $ 453,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ========== Reserve for returns.................returns.................. $1,690,000 $50,837,000 $ -- $(51,084,000)(2) $1,443,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ========== FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997: Allowance for doubtful accounts.....accounts...... $ 181,000 $ 413,000 $224,000(3) $ (289,000)(1) $ 529,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ========== Reserve for returns.................returns.................. $1,046,000 $44,202,000 $918,000(3) $(44,476,000)(2) $1,690,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ========== FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996: Allowance for doubtful accounts..... $ 142,000 $ 99,000 $ -- $ (60,000)(1) $ 181,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ========== Reserve for returns................. $ 642,000 $32,793,000 $ -- $(32,389,000)(2) $1,046,000 ========== =========== ======== ============ ==========
- ------------------------- (1) Write off of uncollectible receivables, net of recoveries. (2) Refunds or credits on products returned. (3) Assumed through acquisitions. 7279 7380 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. 7380 7481 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Information in response to this Item with respect to certain information relating to the Company's executive officers is contained in paragraph K of Item I and with respect to other information relating to the Company's executive officers and its directors is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K. 7481 7582 PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, LISTS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K EXHIBIT INDEX a) Exhibits
EXHIBIT NUMBER PAGE - ------- ---- 2 -- Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger, dated January 5, 1998, by and among the Registrant, National Media Corporation and Quantum Direct Corporation (formerly known as V-L Holdings Corp.) (A).................................. 3.1 -- Sixth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended.(B)................................................ 3.2 -- Bylaws, as amended.(B)..................................... 10.1 -- Amended 1990 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant.(C)+...... 10.2 -- Form of Option Agreement under the Amended 1990 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant.(A)+................................ 10.3 -- 1994 Executive Stock Option and Compensation Plan of the Registrant. (I)(F)+............................................ 10.4 -- Form of Option Agreement under the 1994 Executive Stock Option and Compensation Plan of the Registrant.(G)+........ 10.5 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Marshall Geller dated as of June 24, 1993.(D).............................. 10.6 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Marshall Geller dated as of June 3, 1994.(A)+.............................. 10.7 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Marshall Geller dated August 8, 1995.(E)+.................................. 10.8 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Marshall Geller dated as of March 3, 1997.(A)+............................. 10.9 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Robert Korkowski dated as of June 24, 1993.(D)+............................. 10.10 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Robert Korkowski dated June 3, 1994.(A)+.................................... 10.11 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Robert Korkowski dated August 8, 1995.(E)+.................................. 10.12 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Robert Korkowski dated March 3, 1997.(A)+................................... 10.13 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Robert Johander dated as of September 1, 1993.(D)+................ 10.14 -- Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Robert Johander dated January 5, 1998.(A).................. 10.15 -- Promissory Note payable to the Registrant dated December 31, 1997 for $25,000 executed by Robert L. Johander.(A)........ 10.16 -- Promissory Note payable to the Registrant dated April 24, 1997 for $140,000 executed by Robert L. Johander.(A)....... 10.17 -- Promissory Note payable to the Registrant dated April 29, 1997 for $35,000 executed by Robert L. Johander.(A)........ 10.18 -- Promissory Note payable to the Registrant dated May 2, 1997 for $58,000 executed by Robert L. Johander.(A).............
75 76
EXHIBIT NUMBER PAGE - ------- ---- 10.19 -- Promissory Note payable to the Registrant dated May 13, 1997 for $15,000 executed by Robert L. Johander.(A)............. 10.20 -- Promissory Note payable to the Registrant dated March 21, 1997 for $50,000 executed by Robert L. ohander. Johander.(A).........
82 83
EXHIBIT NUMBER - ------- 10.21 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Nicholas Jaksich dated as of September 1, 1993.(D)+................. 10.22 -- Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Nicholas Jaksich dated January 5, 1998.(A)................. 10.23 -- Term Promissory Note payable to the Registrant dated November 20, 1995 for $500,000 executed by Nicholas M. Jaksich.(A)................................................ 10.24 -- Mortgage dated November 20, 1995 between Nicholas M. Jaksich and the Registrant.(A)..................................... 10.25 -- Form of Mortgage Subordination Agreement dated as of November, 1997 by and among LaSalle Bank F.S.B. and the Registrant.(A)............................................. 10.26 -- Promissory Note payable to the Registrant dated May 15, 1995 for $50,000 executed by Nicholas MM. Jaksich.(A)............. 10.27 -- Transponder Lease Agreement between the Registrant and Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. dated as of July 23, 1993 as supplemented by letters dated as of July 23, 1993.(D)... 10.28 -- Transponder Service Agreement between the Registrant and Hughes Communications Satellite Services, Inc.(D).......... 10.29 -- Industrial Space Lease Agreement between Registrant and Shady Oak Partners dated August 31, 1994.(B)............... 10.30 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Stuart R. Romenesko dated January 5, 1998. (A)+....................... 10.31 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Paul Tosetti dated September 4, 1996.(A)+............................... 10.32 10.31 -- Option Agreement between the Registrant and Paul Tosetti dated March 3, 1997.(A)+................................... 10.33 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Scott Lindquist dated November 30, 1995. (E)+..................... 10.34 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Scott Lindquist dated January 5, 1998. (G)+....................... 10.35 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and David T. Quinby dated February 1, 1997. (F)+......................... 10.36 -- Employment Agreement dated January 5, 1998 by and between the Registrant and David T. Quinby. (G)+.................... 10.37 10.32 -- Asset and Stock Purchase and Option Grant Agreement dated as of November 14, 1997 by and among the Registrant, VVI Seattle, Inc., VVILPTV, Inc., VVI Spokane, Inc., VVI Tallahassee, Inc. and Paxson Communications Corporation.(A)......................................................... 10.38 10.33 -- Amendment to Asset and Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 27, 1998.(A)...................................... 10.39 10.34 -- Employment Agreement dated January 12, 1998 by and between the Registrant and Gregory Lerman.(G)+..................... 10.40 -- Employment Agreement dated March 30, 1998 by and among Quantum Direct Corporation, the Registrant and Gene McCaffery. (H)+.............................................
76 77
EXHIBIT NUMBER PAGE - ------- ---- 10.41 10.35 -- Stipulation made as of November 1, 1997 between Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated ("Montgomery Ward") and the Registrant Regarding the Assumption and Modification of Executory Contracts and Related Agreements.(G)............. 10.42 10.36 -- Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement made as of November 1, 1997 between Montgomery Ward and the Registrant.(G)......................................................... 10.43 10.37 -- Amended and Restated Credit Card License Agreement made as of November 1, 1997 between Montgomery Ward and the Registrant.(G)............................................. 10.44 10.38 -- Second Amended and Restated Servicemark License Agreement made as of November 1, 1997 between Montgomery Ward and the Registrant.(G)............................................. 10.45 -- Stock Option Agreement (ValueVision) dated as of January 5, 1998 between the Registrant and National Media. (J)......... 10.46 -- Stock Option Agreement (National Media) dated as of January 5, 1998 between National Media and the Registrant. (J)...... 10.47 -- Redemption and Consent Agreement dated January 5, 1998 by and between National Media, the Registrant, Capital Ventures International and RGC International Investors, LDC. (J)..... 10.48 -- $10,000,000 Demand Promissory Note dated January 5, 1998 issued by National Media to the Registrant. (J)............. 10.49 -- Subsidiary Guarantee dated as of January 5, 1998 by Quantum North America, Inc., Quantum International Limited, Quantum Far East Ltd., Quantum Marketing International, Inc., Quantum International Japan Company Ltd., DirectAmerica Corporation, Positive Response Television, Inc., Quantum Productions AG, Suzanne Paul (Australia) Pty Limited, and National Media Holdings, Inc., for the benefit of the Registrant. (J)............................................. 10.50 -- Warrant Agreement by and between National Media and the Registrant dated as of January 5, 1998. (J)................. 10.51 -- Warrant Certificate No. 1 dated January 5, 1998, issued by National Media to the Registrant to purchase 250,000 shares of National Media common stock. (J)......................... 10.52 10.39 -- Registration Rights Agreement by and between National Media and the Registrant dated as of January 5, 1998. (J)......... 11(H) 10.40 -- ComputationEmployment Agreement between the Registrant and Gene McCaffery dated March 30, 1998.(I)+ 10.41 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Stuart R. Romenesko dated May 1, 1998.(I)+ 10.42 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and David T. Quinby dated May 1, 1998.(I)+ 10.43 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Cary Deacon dated December 30, 1998.(K)+
83 84
EXHIBIT NUMBER - ------- 10.44 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Edwin Pohlmann dated January 6, 1999.(K)+ 10.45 -- Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Jon Thom dated December 30, 1998.(K)+ 10.46 -- Investment Agreement by and between ValueVision and GE Capital dated as of Net Income Per Share. (G).................... 87March 8, 1999.(J) 10.47 -- Distribution and Marketing Agreement dated as of March 8, 1999 by and between NBC and ValueVision.(J) 10.48 -- Letter Agreement dated March 8, 1999 between NBC, GE Capital and ValueVision.(J) 10.49 -- Form of Shareholder Agreement between ValueVision and GE Capital.(J) 10.50 -- Form of Certificate of Designation of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.(J) 10.51 -- Form of ValueVision Common Stock Purchase Warrant to be issued to GE Capital.(J) 10.52 -- Form of Registration Rights Agreement between ValueVision and GE Capital.(J) 21 -- Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (G)............. 88(K) 23 -- Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP. (G)......................... 89(K) 27 -- Financial Data Schedule (for SEC use only). (G).............(K)
- ------------------------- (A) Incorporated herein by reference to Quantum Direct Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed on March 13, 1998, File No. 333-47979. (B) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, for the quarter ended August 31, 1994, filed on September 13, 1994. (C) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on December 20, 1994, No. 33-38374, as amended on Form SB-2. (D) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on October 13, 1993, as amended, File No. 33-70256. (E) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended January 31, 1996, filed April 29, 1996, as amended, File No. 0-20243. 77 78 (F) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1997, filed on May 1, 1997, as amended, File No. 0-20243. (G) Filed herewith. (H) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 26, 1998, filed on March 31, 1998, File No. 0-20243. (I) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Proxy Statement in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders held on August 17, 1994, filed on July 19, 1994, File No. 0-20243. (J) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 1998, filed on January 8, 1998, File No. 0-20243. + Management compensatory plan/arrangement. (A) Incorporated herein by reference to Quantum Direct Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed on March 13, 1998, File No 333-47979. (B) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, for the quarter ended August 31, 1994, filed on September 13, 1994. (C) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on December 20, 1994, No. 33-38374, as amended on Form SB-2. (D) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on October 13, 1993, as amended, File No 33-70256. (E) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended January 31, 1996, filed April 29, 1996, as amended, File No. 0-20243. (F) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Proxy Statement in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders held on August 17, 1994, filed on July 19, 1994, File No. 0-20243. (G) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1998, filed on April 30, 1998, File No. 0-20243. (H) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 1998, filed on January 8, 1998, File No 0-20243. (I) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended April 30, 1998, filed on June 10, 1998. (J) Incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 8, 1999, filed on March 18, 1999, File No. 0-20243. (K) Filed herewith + Management compensatory plan/arrangement
b) Reports on Form 8-K (i) The Registrant filed a Form 8-K on November 17, 1997December 23, 1998 reporting under Item 5, that the Registrant and Paxson Communications Corporation ("Paxson") signed a definitive agreement under which Paxson will acquire,Company announced that it had settled the lawsuit filed on December 17, 1997 by Time Warner Entertainment 84 85 Company, L.P. for total consideration of $35$7.0 million in cash the Registrant's television station KBGE-TV, Channel 33, Seattle, Washington along with two of the Registrant's non-cable, low-power stations in Portland, Oregon and Indianapolis, Indiana and minority interests in entities which have applied for two new stations. (ii) The company filed a Form 8-K on December 22, 1997 reporting under Item 5, the Registrant's Press Release dated December 19, 1997 announcing that the Registrant was named in a lawsuit filed byCompany had also renewed its cable affiliation agreement with Time Warner Cable against Bridgeways Communications Corporation and the Registrant alleging, among other things, tortious interference with contractual and business relations and breach of contract. (iii) The Registrant filed a Form 8-K on January 8, 1998 reporting under Item 5, the Registrant's Press Release dated January 5, 1998 announcing the National Media Corporation and ValueVision Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger dated January 5, 1998 by and among the Registrant, National Media Corporation and Quantum Direct Corporation (formerly known as V-L Holdings Corp). (iv)for an additional five-year term. (ii) The Registrant filed a Form 8-K on March 31, 199818, 1999 reporting under Item 5, that the Registrant's Press Release dated March 26, 1998 announcingCompany entered into a strategic alliance with the Registrant's fourth quarterNational Broadcasting Company, Inc. ("NBC") and year end earningsG.E. Capital Equity Investments, Inc. ("GE Capital"). Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, NBC and GE Capital have agreed to jointly acquire an approximate 19.9% ownership interest in ValueVision (consisting of 5,339,500 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, and a warrant to acquire 1,450,000 shares of Common Stock under a Distribution and Marketing Agreement) for aggregate consideration of approximately $56.0 million (or approximately $8.29 per share). In addition, ValueVision will issue NBC and GE Capital a warrant to increase their potential aggregate equity stake to 39.9%, subject to approval of ValueVision's shareholders. NBC will also have the exclusive right to negotiate on behalf of ValueVision for the three and twelve months ended January 31, 1998. The Registrant also reported under Item 5 the selectiondistribution of veteran marketing, direct response and retail executive, Gene McCaffery, as Chief Executive Officer of Quantum Direct Corporation, the international electronic commerce company to be formed by the proposed merger of the Registrant and National Media Corporation. (v) The Registrant filed a Form 8-K on April 9, 1998 reporting under Item 5, the Registrant's Press Release dated April 8, 1998 announcing the postponement of the special shareholder meetings of the Registrant's and National Media Corporation to vote on their proposed merger in light of the Registrant's dissenting shareholders. 78its television home shopping services. 85 79 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 79 8086 SIGNATURES In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on April 29, 1998.6, 1999. ValueVision International, Inc. (registrant) By: /s/ ROBERT L. JOHANDERGENE MCCAFFERY ------------------------------------ Robert L. JohanderGene McCaffery Chief Executive Officer In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on April 29, 1998.6, 1999.
NAME TITLE ---- ----- /s/ ROBERT L. JOHANDERGENE MCCAFFERY Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Robert L. Johander Director /s/ NICHOLAS M. JAKSICH Chief Operating Officer,Gene McCaffery President and - --------------------------------------------- Director Nicholas M. Jaksich /s/ STUART R. ROMENESKO Senior Vice President Finance and Chief - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Stuart R. Romenesko and Accounting Officer) /s/ MARSHALL S. GELLER Director - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marshall S. Geller /s/ PAUL D. TOSETTI Director - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Tosetti /s/ ROBERT J. KORKOWSKI Director - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert J. Korkowski
8086