- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------================================================================================

                UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
           SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2003

                                  OR


   [ ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
           SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO 
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ____________ to__________ COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-16097 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. (Exact nameName of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) TEXAS 74-1790172 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number) 5803 GLENMONT DRIVE 77081-1701 HOUSTON, TEXAS (Zip Code) (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(713) 592-7200 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTIONSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) OF THE ACT:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED ------------------- ----------------------------------------- Common Stock, par value $.01 per share New York Stock Exchange
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTIONof the Act: Name of each exchange Title of each class on which registered ------------------- ------------------- COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) OF THE ACT:of the Act: NONE Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]. No [ ]]. Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ][X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X]. No [ ]]. The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of shares of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on August 2, 2002,2003, was approximately $626.0$829.7 million. The number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding on April 25, 20039, 2004 was 39,543,750,36,102,071 excluding 3,055,8646,979,423 shares classified as Treasury Stock. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
DOCUMENT INCORPORATED AS TO -------- ------------------ Notice and Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Part III: Items 10, 11, 1210,11,12 and 13 Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held July 1, 2003.June 30, 2004.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FORM 10-K REPORT INDEX
PAGE 10-K PART AND ITEM NO. PAGE NO. - ---------------------- ------------ PART I Item 1. Business....................................................Business....................................................................... 1 Item 2. Properties..................................................Properties..................................................................... 7 Item 3. Legal Proceedings...........................................Proceedings.............................................................. 9 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 9Holders............................ 10 PART II Item 5. Market for the Company's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters......................................... 10Matters......... 11 Item 6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 11Data........................................................ 12 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................... 13Operations..................................................................... 14 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk........................................................ 21Risk..................... 24 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 22Data.................................... 25 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.................................... 41Disclosure..................................................................... 43 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures........................................................ 43 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Company............. 41Company................................ 43 Item 11. Executive Compensation...................................... 41Compensation......................................................... 43 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.................................................. 41Management and Related Stockholder Matters............................................................ 43 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 42Transactions................................. 43 Item 14. ControlsPrincipal Accountant Fees and Procedures..................................... 42Services......................................... 43 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K......................................................... 428-K................ 44
PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS GENERAL The Men's Wearhouse began operations in 1973 as a partnership and was incorporated as The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. (the "Company") under the laws of Texas in May 1974. Our principal corporate and executive offices are located at 5803 Glenmont Drive, Houston, Texas 77081-1701 (telephone number 713/592-7200), and at 40650 Encyclopedia Circle, Fremont, California 94538-2453 (telephone number 510/657-9821), respectively. Unless the context otherwise requires, "Company", "we", "us" and "our" refer to The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. and its wholly owned or controlled subsidiaries. Our website address is www.menswearhouse.com. Through the investor relations section of our website, we provide free access to our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The SEC also maintains a website that contains the Company's filings at www.sec.gov. THE COMPANY We are one of the largest specialty retailers of menswearmen's suits in the United States and Canada. At February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, our U.S. operations included 575579 retail apparel stores in 44 states and the District of Columbia, primarily operating under the brand names of Men's Wearhouse and K&G, with approximately 26%25% of our locations in Texas and California. At February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, our Canadian operations included 114 retail apparel stores in 10 provinces operating under the brand name of Moores Clothing for Men. MEN'S WEARHOUSEBelow is a brief description of our brands: Men's Wearhouse Under the Men's Wearhouse brand, we target middle and upper-middle income men by offering quality merchandise at everyday low prices. In addition to value, we believe we provide a superior level of customer service. Men's Wearhouse stores offer a broad selection of designer, brand name and private label merchandise at prices we believe are typically 20% to 30% below the regular prices found at traditional department and specialty stores. Our merchandise includes suits, sport coats, slacks, business casual, sportswear, outerwear, dress shirts, shoes and accessories. We concentrate on business attire that is characterized by infrequent and more predictable fashion changes. Therefore, we believe we are not as exposed to trends typical of more fashion-forward apparel retailers, where significant markdowns and promotional pricing are more common. At February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, we operated 505506 Men's Wearhouse stores in 44 states and the District of Columbia. These stores are referred to as "Men's Wearhouse stores" or "traditional stores". We also began a tuxedo rental program in selected Men's Wearhouse stores during 1999. We believe this program generates incremental business for us without significant incremental personnel or real estate costs and broadens our customer base by drawing first-time and younger customers into our stores. We completed the rollout of this program to our traditional stores during the first quarter of fiscal 2002 and as of our fiscal year end, offerednow offer tuxedo rentals in 495substantially all of our Men's Wearhouse stores. K&G Under the K&G brand, we target the more price sensitive customer. The K&G brand was acquired as a result of our combination with K&G Men's Center, Inc. in June 19991999. At January 31, 2004, we operated 73 K&G stores in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Prior to the combination, our Value Priced Clothing ("VPC") subsidiary targeted the market for the more price sensitive customer. During 2001, VPC merged into K&G, with the23 states, which includes five former VPC stores continuing operationsoperating under the name The Suit Warehouse ("TSW"). At February 1, 2003, we operated 65 K&G stores(four in 23 states and four TSW stores inthe metropolitan Detroit, Michigan area and one in Ohio. Twenty-fourToledo, Ohio). Thirty-five of the K&G stores offer ladies' career apparel that is also targeted to the more price sensitive customer. 1 We believe that K&G's more basic, value-oriented superstore approach appeals to certain customers in the apparel market. K&G offers first-quality, current-season apparel and accessories comparable in quality to that of traditional department and specialty stores, at everyday low prices we believe are typically 30% to 70% below the regular prices charged by such stores. K&G's merchandising strategy emphasizes broad assortments across all major categories, including tailored clothing, casual sportswear, dress furnishings, footwear and accessories. This merchandise selection, which includes brand name as well as private label merchandise, positions K&G to attract a 1 wide range of customers in each of its markets. As with the Men's Wearhouse brand, K&G's philosophy of delivering everyday value distinguishes K&G from other retailers that adopt a more promotional pricing strategy. MOORES On February 10, 1999,Moores Under the Moores brand, we combinedtarget middle and upper-middle income men in Canada by offering quality merchandise at everyday low prices. Moores, which was acquired as a result of our combination with Moores Retail Group Inc. ("Moores"), a privately owned Canadian corporation, in a transaction accounted for as a pooling of interests (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). MooresFebruary 1999, is one of Canada's leading specialty retailers of menswear,men's suits, with 114 retail apparel stores in 10 Canadian provinces at February 1, 2003.January 31, 2004. Similar to the Men's Wearhouse stores, Moores stores offer a broad selection of quality merchandise at prices we believe are typically 20% to 30% below the regular prices charged by traditional Canadian department and specialty stores. Moores focuses on conservative, basic tailored apparel. Thisapparel that we believe limits exposure to changes in fashion trends and the need for significant markdowns. Moores' merchandise consists of suits, sport coats, slacks, business casual, dress shirts, sportswear, outerwear, shoes and accessories. In October 2003, we extended our tuxedo rental program to our Moores typically offers a full assortmentstores, and, as of suits and sport coats with pricesJanuary 31, 2004, offered tuxedo rentals in 48 Moores stores. Subsequent to year end, the tuxedo program has been extended to the remainder of suits generally ranging from Can$149 to Can$369.the Moores stores. Moores distinguishes itself from other Canadian retailers of menswear by manufacturing a significant portion of the tailored clothing for sale in its stores. Moores conducts its manufacturing operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Brand Clothing (Canada) Ltd. ("Golden Brand"), which is the second largest manufacturer of men's suits and sport coats in Canada. Golden Brand's manufacturing facility in Montreal, Quebec, includes a cutting room, fusing department, pant shop and coat shop. At full capacity, the coat shop can produce 13,000 units per week and the pant shop can produce 23,000 units per week. As a result of the vertical integration and the related cost savings, Moores is able to provide greater value to its customer by offering a broad selection of quality merchandise at everyday low prices, which the Company believes typically range from 20% to 30% below the regular prices charged by traditional Canadian department and specialty stores. Beginning in 1999, Golden Brand also manufactures product for Men's Wearhouse stores. EXPANSION STRATEGY Our expansion strategy includes: - opening additional Men's Wearhouse and K&G stores in new and existing markets, - expanding our tuxedo rental program to Moores stores, - testing opportunities to market complementary products and services, - testing expanded, more fashion-oriented merchandise concepts, and - identifying strategic acquisition opportunities, including but not limited to international opportunities, - testing expanded merchandise categories in selected stores, and - expanding our business to include complementary products and services.opportunities. In general terms, we consider a geographic area served by a common group of television stations as a single market. On a limited basis, we have acquired store locations, inventories, customer lists, trademarks and tradenames from existing menswear retailers in both new and existing markets. We may do so again in the future. At present, in 20032004 we plan to open an additional 10approximately eleven new Men's Wearhouse stores and seveneight new K&G stores, to close twoapproximately six Men's Wearhouse stores and sixfour K&G stores, to expand andand/or relocate up to 19approximately twelve existing Men's Wearhouse stores and up to fourone existing K&G storesstore and to continue expansion in subsequent years. We believe that our ability to increase the number of traditional stores in the United States above 550 will be limited. However, we believe that additional growth opportunities exist through improving and diversifying the merchandise mix, relocating stores, expanding our K&G brand and adding complementary products and services. In connection with our strategy of testing opportunities to market complementary products and services, in December 2003 we acquired the assets and operating leases for 13 retail dry cleaning and laundry facilities operating in the metropolitan Houston, Texas area. We may open or acquire additional facilities on a limited basis during 2004 as we test market and evaluate the feasibility of developing a national retail dry cleaning and laundry line of business. However, we do not expect these operations or expansion efforts to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for 2004. 2 We also plan to open six new casual clothing/sportswear concept stores in 2004 in order to test an expanded, more fashion-oriented merchandise concept for men and women. These stores will be 3,000 to 3,500 square feet and will be located in high-end regional malls. They will target the 25 to 35 year old customer with Latin-inspired store designs and offerings. We do not expect these operations to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for 2004. MERCHANDISING Our stores offer a broad selection of designer, brand name and private label men's business attire, including a consistent stock of core items (such as navy blazers, tuxedos and basic suits). Although basic styles are emphasized, each season's merchandise reflects current fabric and color trends, and a small percentage of inventory, accessories in particular, are usually more fashion oriented. The broad merchandise selection creates increased sales opportunities by permitting a customer to purchase substantially all of his tailored wardrobe and accessory requirements, including shoes, at our stores. Within our tailored clothing, we offer an assortment of styles from a variety of manufacturers and maintain a broad selection of fabrics, colors and sizes. WeBased on the experience and expertise of our management, we believe that the depth of selection offered provides us with an advantage over most of our competitors. During fiscal 2002, we also shifted our merchandise mix in order to increase our offering of opening price point product in our traditional stores. We believe this shift better aligns our product selection with the everyday low price value proposition we want to offer our Men's Wearhouse brand customers. The Company's inventory mix includes "business casual" merchandise designed to meet demand for such products resulting from more relaxed dress codes in the workplace. This merchandise consists of tailored and non-tailored clothing (sport coats, casual slacks, knits and woven sports shirts, sweaters and casual shoes) that complements the existing product mix and provides opportunity for enhanced sales without significant inventory risk. We do not purchase significant quantities of merchandise overruns or close-outs. We provide recognizable quality merchandise at consistent prices that assist the customer in identifying the value available at our stores. We believe that the merchandise at Men's Wearhouse and Moores stores is generally offered 20% to 30% below traditional department and specialty store regular prices and that merchandise at K&G stores is generally 30% to 70% below regular retail prices charged by such stores. A ticket is affixed to each item, which displays our selling price alongside the price we regard as the regular price of the item at traditional department and specialty stores. By targeting men's business attire, a category of men's clothing characterized by infrequent and more predictable fashion changes, we believe we are not as exposed to trends typical of more fashion-forward apparel retailers. This allows us to carry basic merchandise over to the following season and reduces the need for markdowns; for example, a navy blazer or gray business suit may be carried over to the next season. Our Men's Wearhouse and Moores stores have an annual sale that starts around Christmas and runs through the month of January, during which prices on many items are reduced 20% to 50% off the everyday low prices. This sale reduces stock at year-end and prepares for the arrival of the new season's merchandise. In 2002, we hadWe also have a similar event in mid-summer; however, the level of advertising for promotion of the summer event wasis lower than that for the year-end event. During 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002, 59.3%2003, 56.8%, 56.8%56.5% and 56.5%55.2%, respectively, of our total net merchandise sales were attributable to tailored clothing (suits, sport coats and slacks) and 40.7%43.2%, 43.2%43.5% and 43.5%44.8%, respectively, were attributable to casual attire, sportswear, shoes, shirts, ties, outerwear and other. In addition to accepting cash, checks or nationally recognized credit cards, we offer our own private label credit card to Men's Wearhouse customers and, in May 2002, we introduced a private label credit card to our Moores customers. We have contracted with a third-party vendor to provide all necessary servicing and processing and to assume all credit risks associated with oura private label credit card program. We believe that the private label credit card provides us with an important tool for targeted marketing and presents an excellent opportunity to communicate with our customers. During 2002,2003, our customers used the private label credit card for approximately 18%16% of our sales at the Men's Wearhouse brand and approximately 8%10% of our sales at the Moores brand. CUSTOMER SERVICE AND MARKETING The Men's Wearhouse and Moores sales personnel are trained as clothing consultants to provide customers with assistance and advice on their apparel needs, including product style, color coordination, fabric and garment fit. For example, clothing consultants at Men's Wearhouse stores attend an intensive training 3 program at our training facility in Fremont, California, which is further supplemented with weekly store meetings, periodic merchandise meetings and frequent interaction with multi-unit managers.all levels of store management. 3 We encourage our clothing consultants to be friendly and knowledgeable and to promptly greet each customer entering the store. Consultants are encouraged to offer guidance to the customer at each stage of the decision-making process, making every effort to earn the customer's confidence and to create a professional relationship that will continue beyond the initial visit. Clothing consultants are also encouraged to contact customers after the purchase or pick-up of tailored clothing to determine whether customers are satisfied with their purchases and, if necessary, to take corrective action. Store personnel have full authority to respond to customer complaints and reasonable requests, including the approval of returns, exchanges, refunds, re-alterations and other special requests, all of which we believe helps promote customer satisfaction and loyalty. K&G stores are designed to allow customers to select and purchase apparel by themselves. For example, each merchandise category is clearly marked and organized by size, and suits are specifically tagged "Athletic Fit," "Double-Breasted," "Three Button," etc., as a means of further assisting customers to easily select their styles and sizes. K&G employees assist customers with merchandise selection, including correct sizing. Each of our stores provides on-site tailoring services to facilitate timely alterations at a reasonable cost to customers. Tailored clothing purchased at a Men's Wearhouse store will be pressed and re-altered (if the alterations were performed at a Men's Wearhouse store) free of charge for the life of the garment. Because management believes that men prefer direct and easy store access, we attempt to locate our stores in regional strip and specialty retail centers or in freestanding buildings to enable customers to park near the entrance of the store. Our total annual advertising expenditures, which were $69.7 million, $61.2 million, and $60.1 million and $62.9 million in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively, are significant. The Company advertises principally on television and radio, which we consider the most effective means of attracting and reaching potential customers, and our advertising campaign is designed to reinforce our various brands. PURCHASING AND DISTRIBUTION We purchase merchandise from approximately 700 vendors. In 2002,2003, no vendor accounted for 10% or more of purchases. Management does not believe that the loss of any vendor would significantly impact us. While we have no material long-term contracts with our vendors, we believe that we have developed an excellent relationship with our vendors, which is supported by consistent purchasing practices. We believe we obtain favorable buying opportunities relative to many of our competitors. We do not request cooperative advertising support from manufacturers, which reduces the manufacturers' costs of doing business with us and enables them to offer us lower prices. Further, we believe we obtain better discounts by entering into purchase arrangements that provide for limited return policies, although we always retain the right to return goods that are damaged upon receipt or determined to be improperly manufactured. Finally, volume purchasing of specifically planned quantities purchased well in advance of the season enables more efficient production runs by manufacturers who, in turn, generally pass some of the cost savings back to us. We purchase a significant portion of our inventory through a direct sourcing program. In addition to finished product, we purchase fabric from mills and contract with certain factories for the assembly of the finished product to be sold in our U.S. and Canadian stores. ArrangementsOur direct sourcing arrangements for fabric and assembly have been with both domestic and foreign mills and factories. During 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, product procured through the direct sourcing program represented approximately 28%, 28%27% and 27%30%, respectively, of total inventory purchases for stores operating in the U.S. We expect that purchases through the direct sourcing program will represent approximately 30%35% of total U.S. purchases in 2003.2004. During 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, our manufacturing operations at Golden Brand provided 45%47%, 47%43% and 43%34%, respectively, of inventory purchases for Moores stores and 6%5%, 5%8% and 8%9% during 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively, of inventory purchases for Men's Wearhouse stores. 4 To protect against currency exchange risks associated with certain firmly committed and certain other probable, but not firmly committed, inventory transactions denominated in a foreign currency (primarily the Euro), we enter into forward exchange contracts. In addition, many of the purchases from foreign vendors are financed by letters of credit. We have entered into license agreements with a limited number of parties under which we are entitled to use designer labels such as "Gary Player(R)" and nationally recognized brand labels such as "Botany(R)" and "Botany 500(R)" in return for royalties paid to the licensor based on the costs of the relevant product. These license agreements generally limit the use of the individual label to products of a specific nature (such as men's suits, men's 4 formal wear or men's shirts). The labels licensed under these agreements will continue to be used in connection with a portion of the purchases under the direct sourcing program described above, as well as purchases from other vendors. We monitor the performance of these licensed labels compared to their cost and may elect to selectively terminate any license, as provided in the respective agreement. We have also purchased several trademarks, including "Cricketeer(R)," "Joseph & Feiss(R)," "Baracuta(R)", "Pronto Uomo(R)," "Linea Uomo(R)," and "Pronto Uomo(R)"Twinhill(R)," which are used similarly to our licensed labels. Because of the continued consolidation in the men's tailored clothing industry, we may be presented with opportunities to acquire or license other designer or nationally recognized brand labels. All merchandise for Men's Wearhouse stores is received into our central warehouse located in Houston, Texas. Merchandise for a store is picked and then moved to the appropriate staging area for shipping. In addition to the central distribution center in Houston, we have space within certain Men's Wearhouse stores or separate hub warehouse facilities in the majority of our markets, which function as redistribution facilities for their respective areas. Most purchased merchandise for Moores and K&G stores is direct shipped by vendors to the stores. We lease and operate 2926 long-haul tractors and 6260 trailers, which, together with common carriers, are used to transport merchandise from the vendors to our distribution facilities and from the distribution facilities to Men's Wearhouse stores within each market. We also lease or own 8076 smaller van-like trucks, which are used to deliver merchandise locally or within a given geographic region. COMPETITION We believe that the unit demand for men's tailored clothing has generally declined over the past decade. Our primary competitors include specialty men's clothing stores, traditional department stores, off-price retailers, manufacturer-owned and independently owned outlet stores and three-day stores. Over the past several years market conditions have resulted in consolidation of the industry. We believe that the principal competitive factors in the menswear market are merchandise assortment, quality, price, garment fit, merchandise presentation, store location and customer service. We believe that strong vendor relationships, our direct sourcing program and our buying volumes and patterns are the principal factors enabling us to obtain quality merchandise at attractive prices. We believe that our vendors rely on our predictable payment record and history of honoring promises, including our promise not to advertise names of labeled and unlabeled designer merchandise when requested. Certain of our competitors (principally department stores) may be larger and may have substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have and therefore may have certain competitive advantages. SEASONALITY Like most retailers, our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically,In most years, over 30% of our net sales and over 45% of our net earnings have been generated during the fourth quarter of each year. Because of the seasonality of our business, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full year (see Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). 5 TRADEMARKS AND SERVICEMARKS We are the owner in the United States of the trademark and servicemark "The Men's Wearhouse(R)" and of federal registrations therefor expiring in 2010, 2009 and 2012, respectively, subject to renewal. We have also been granted registrations for that trademark and servicemark in the 4443 states (including Texas and California) in which we currently do business (as well as the District of Columbia) and have used those marks. We are also the owner of "MW Men's Wearhouse (and design)(R)" and federal registrations therefor expiring in 2010 and 2011, respectively, subject to renewal. Our rights in the "The Men's Wearhouse(R)" and "MW Men's Wearhouse (and design)(R)" marks are a significant part of our business, as the marks have become well known through our television and radio advertising campaigns. Accordingly, we intend to maintain our marks and the related registrations. We are also the owner in the United States of the servicemarks "The Suit Warehouse(R)" and "The Suit Warehouse and logo,(and logo)," which are tradenames used by certain of the stores in Michigan and Ohio operated by K&G, and "K&G(R)", which is a tradename used by K&G stores. K&G stores also operate under the tradenames "K&G Men's Superstore(R)," "K&G Men's Center(R)," "K&G MenSmart(R)" and "K&G Ladies(R)." We own the registrations for "K&G(R)," "K&G (stylized)(R)," "K&G For Men. For Women. For Less(R)," "K&G Men's Superstore(R)," "K&G Men's Superstore (and design)(R) ," "K&G Ladies(R)," and "K&G Ladies(R)Superstore(R)." The application for the servicemark "K&G Ladies Superstore" is in process.pending. In addition, we own or license other 5 trademarks/servicemarks used in the business, principally in connection with the labeling of products purchased through the direct sourcing program. We own Canadian trademark registrations for the marks "Moores The Suit People(R)," "Moores Vetements Pour Hommes(R)," "Moores Vetements Pour Hommes (and design)(R)," "Moores Clothing For Men(R)" and "Moores Clothing For Men (and design)(R)." Moores stores operate under the tradenames "Moores Clothing For Men" and "Moores Vetements Pour Hommes." EMPLOYEES At February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, we had approximately 11,50012,300 employees, of whom approximately 9,0009,400 were full-time and approximately 2,5002,900 were part-time employees. Seasonality affects the number of part-time employees as well as the number of hours worked by full-time and part-time personnel. Approximately 1,032984 of our employees at Golden Brand belong to the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees. Golden Brand is part of a collective bargaining unit, of which it is the largest company. The current union contract expires in November 2005. 6 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES As of February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, we operated 575579 retail apparel stores in 44 states and the District of Columbia and 114 retail apparel stores in the 10 Canadian provinces. The following table sets forth the location, by state or province, of these stores:
MEN'S WEARHOUSEMen's Wearhouse K&G MOORESMoores --------- --- ------ UNITED STATES California..................................................California............................................. 86 5 Texas.......................................................Texas.................................................. 45 12 Florida.....................................................Florida................................................ 37 2 Illinois.................................................... 23New York............................................... 24 3 Illinois............................................... 22 5 Michigan....................................................Pennsylvania........................................... 21 3 Michigan............................................... 20 6 Ohio................................................... 18 6 Georgia................................................ 17 6 Virginia............................................... 17 2 Massachusetts.......................................... 14 2 New York.................................................... 24 2 Ohio........................................................ 18 5 Pennsylvania................................................ 21 1 Georgia..................................................... 15 6 New Jersey..................................................Jersey............................................. 13 5 Virginia.................................................... 17 1 Massachusetts............................................... 14 3 Maryland.................................................... 127 Maryland............................................... 13 4 Washington..................................................Washington............................................. 13 2 Colorado....................................................Colorado............................................... 12 2 North Carolina..............................................Carolina......................................... 12 1 Arizona.....................................................Arizona................................................ 11 Minnesota...................................................Missouri............................................... 10 1 Minnesota.............................................. 9 2 Missouri.................................................... 10 1 Connecticut.................................................Tennessee.............................................. 9 1 Tennessee................................................... 9Connecticut............................................ 8 2 Oregon................................................. 8 Indiana................................................ 7 1 Indiana..................................................... 8Wisconsin.............................................. 7 Alabama................................................ 5 1 Oregon...................................................... 8 Wisconsin................................................... 7 Alabama.....................................................Utah................................................... 5 Louisiana...................................................Nevada................................................. 5 Louisiana.............................................. 4 1 Nevada...................................................... 5 Utah........................................................ 5 Kansas......................................................Kentucky............................................... 4 Kansas................................................. 3 1 Kentucky.................................................... 3 Nebraska....................................................Nebraska .............................................. 3 New Hampshire...............................................Hampshire.......................................... 3 Oklahoma....................................................Oklahoma............................................... 3 South Carolina..............................................Carolina......................................... 3 Arkansas....................................................Arkansas............................................... 2 Delaware....................................................Delaware............................................... 2 Iowa........................................................Iowa................................................... 2 New Mexico..................................................Mexico............................................. 2 Idaho.......................................................Idaho.................................................. 1 Maine.......................................................Maine.................................................. 1 Mississippi.................................................Mississippi............................................ 1 Rhode Island................................................Island........................................... 1 South Dakota................................................Dakota........................................... 1 West Virginia...............................................Virginia.......................................... 1 District of Columbia........................................Columbia................................... 1 CANADA Ontario.....................................................Ontario................................................ 50 Quebec......................................................Quebec................................................. 23 British Columbia............................................Columbia....................................... 14 Alberta.....................................................Alberta................................................ 12 Manitoba....................................................Manitoba............................................... 5 New Brunswick...............................................Brunswick.......................................... 3 Nova Scotia.................................................Scotia............................................ 3 Saskatchewan................................................Saskatchewan........................................... 2 Newfoundland................................................Newfoundland........................................... 1 Prince Edward Island........................................Island................................... 1 --- -- --- Total................................................... 505 70Total.............................................. 506 73 114 === == ===
7 Men's Wearhouse and Moores stores vary in size from approximately 2,950 to 15,100 total square feet (average square footage at February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 was 5,5625,585 square feet with 66%67% of stores having between 4,500 and 6,500 square feet). Men's Wearhouse and Moores stores are primarily located in middle and upper- middleupper-middle income regional strip and specialty retail shopping centers. We believe our customers generally prefer to limit the amount of time they spend shopping for menswear and seek easily accessible store sites. Men's Wearhouse and Moores stores are designed to further our strategy of facilitating sales while making the shopping experience pleasurable. We attempt to create a specialty store atmosphere through effective merchandise presentation and sizing, attractive in-store signs and efficient checkout procedures. Most of these stores have similar floor plans and merchandise presentation to facilitate the shopping experience and sales process. Designer, brand name and private label garments are intermixed, and emphasis is placed on the fit of the garment rather than on a particular label or manufacturer. Each store is staffed with clothing consultants and sales associates and has a tailoring facility with at least one tailor. K&G stores vary in size from approximately 5,400 to 50,000 total square feet (average square footage at February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 was 21,42422,917 square feet with 41%44% of stores having between 15,000 and 25,000 square feet). K&G stores are "destination" stores located primarily in low-cost warehouses and second generation strip shopping centers that are easily accessible from major highways and thoroughfares. K&G has created a 25,000 square foot prototype men's and ladies' superstore with fitting rooms and convenient check-out, customer service and tailoring areas. K&G stores are organized to convey the impression of a dominant assortment of first-quality merchandise and to project a no-frills, value-oriented warehouse atmosphere. Each element of store layout and merchandise presentation is designed to reinforce K&G's strategy of providing a large selection and assortment in each category. We seek to make K&G stores "customer friendly" by utilizing store signage and grouping merchandise by categories and sizes, with brand name and private label merchandise intermixed. We also seek to instill a sense of urgency for the customer to purchase by opening K&G stores for business on Thursdays, (as of April 2003), Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays only, except for a limited number of Monday holidays and an expanded schedule for thecertain holiday seasonperiods when stores are open every day. Each store is typically staffed with a manager, assistant manager and other employees who serve as customer service and sales personnel and cashiers. Each store also has a tailoring facility with at least one tailor. We lease our stores on terms generally from five to ten years with renewal options at higher fixed rates in most cases. Leases typically provide for percentage rent over sales break points. Additionally, most leases provide for a base rent as well as "triple net charges", including but not limited to common area and maintenance expenses, property taxes, utilities, center promotions and insurance. In certain markets, we lease between 1,000 and 3,000 additional square feet in either a Men's Wearhouse store or a separate hub warehouse unit to be utilized as a redistribution facility in that geographic area. During 1999, we purchased a 46-acre site in Houston on which we have developed our principal warehouse and distribution facilities. The first phase of development, an approximately 385,000 square foot facility to support our tuxedo rental program and our flat-packed merchandise, became operational during 2001. In early 2003, we implemented an in-house tuxedo dry cleaning plant as part of the facility. In late 2003, we completed phase two of our development, an addition of approximately 242,000 square feet primarily to support the tuxedo rental program. In 2004, we plan to develop an additional 300,000 square feet in order to accommodate the centralization of our warehouse and distribution program for K&G. We also own a 240,000 square foot facility situated on approximately seven acres of land in Houston, Texas which serves as our principalan office, warehouse and distribution facility. Approximately 65,000 square feet of this facility is used as office space for our financial, information technology and merchandisingconstruction departments with the remaining 175,000 square feet serving as a warehouse and distribution center. We also own a 150,000 square foot facility, situated on an adjacent six acres, comprised of approximately 9,000 square feet of office space and 141,000 square feet serving as a warehouse and distribution center. During 1999, we purchased a 46-acre site in Houston on which we have developed additional new distribution facilities. The first phase of development, an approximately 385,000 square foot distribution center to support our tuxedo rental program and our flat-packed merchandise, became operational during the first and second quarters of 2001. In 2003, we plan to develop an additional 200,000 square feet as an expansion of our existing tuxedo operations. Our executive offices in Fremont, California are housed in a 35,500 square foot facility that we own. This facility serves as an office and training facility. We also lease 17,41718,788 square feet of additional office space in fourtwo other locations and 27,000 square feet of warehouse space in Richmond, California. K&G leases a 100,000 square foot facility in Atlanta, Georgia which serves as an office, distribution and store facility. Approximately 47,00035,000 square feet of this facility is used as office space for financial, information 8 technology and merchandising personnel, 11,00023,000 square feet is used as a distribution center for store fixtures and supplies and the remaining 42,000 square feet is used as a store. 8 Moores leases a 37,700 square foot facility in Toronto, Ontario, comprised of approximately 17,900 square feet of office space and 19,800 square feet usedutilized for warehousing and distribution. Moores also leases a 48,930 square foot facility in Toronto that is utilized as a warehouse andits tuxedo distribution center. In addition, Moores also leases a 94,700 square foot warehouse and distribution center facility in Montreal, Quebec, and a 230,000 square foot facility in Montreal, Quebec comprised ofcomprising approximately 13,000 square feet of office space, 37,600 square feet of warehouse space and 179,400 square feet of manufacturing space. The lease for the 94,700 square foot warehouse and distribution center in Montreal will expire in early 2005. Moores does not intend to renew that lease. Instead, Moores has made an offer to purchase vacant land from the City of Montreal and intends to construct an approximately 80,000 square foot facility on this land. It is anticipated that construction will begin in late spring 2004 and that the premises will be occupied by the end of the year. The total cost of the land, building and leasehold improvements is expected to be approximately US$5 million. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On May 11, 2001, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego, Cause No. GIC 767223 (the "San Diego County Suit"). The San Diego County Suit, which was brought as a purported class action, alleges several causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that we advertised and sold men's slacks at a marked price that was exclusive of a hemming fee for the pants. The San Diego County Suit seeks: (i) permanent and preliminary injunctions against advertising slacks at prices which do not include hemming; (ii) restitution of all funds allegedly acquired by means of any act or practice declared by the Court to be unlawful or fraudulent or to constitute unfair competition under certain California statutes, (iii) prejudgment interest; (iv) compensatory and punitive damages; (v) attorney's fees; and (vi) costs of suit. We believe that the San Diego County Suit is without merit and the allegations are contrary to customary and well recognized and accepted practices in the sale of men's tailored clothing. The complaint in the San Diego County Suit was subsequently amended to add similar causes of action and requests for relief based upon allegations that our alleged "claims that [it] sell[s] the same garments as department stores at 20% to 30% less" are false and misleading. We believe that such added causes of action are also without merit. The court ruled against the plaintiff's motion for class certification, declining to certify a class. On October 17, 2002, the court granted summary adjudication in favor of the Company on the plaintiff's false advertising claim on behalf of the general public relating to hemming fees, and also reaffirmed its earlier ruling denying class certification. The court found there were triable issues of fact, and therefore denied summary adjudication on the remaining claims. The court has tentatively set a trial date for May 19, 2003. The Company intends to vigorously defend the San Diego County Suit. On April 18, 2003, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California for the County of Orange, Case No. 03CC00132 (the "Orange County Suit"). On April 21, 2003, a lawsuit was filed against K&G Men's Center, Inc. and K&G Men's Company Inc. (collectively, "K&G"), wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, in the Los Angeles Superior Court of California, Case No. BC294361 (the "Los Angeles County Suit"; the Los Angeles County Suit and the Orange County Suit shall be referred to jointly as the "Suits"). The Suits, which were bothOrange County Suit was brought as a purported class actions,action. The Los Angeles County Suit was brought as a multi-party action. The Suits allege several causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that in the State of California the Company and K&G misclassified its managers and assistant managers as exempt from the application of certain California labor statutes. Because of this alleged misclassification, the Suits allege that the Company and K&G failed to pay overtime compensation and provide the required rest periods to such employees. The Suits seek, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief along with an accounting as to alleged wages, premium pay, penalties, interest and restitution allegedly due the class defendants. On April 23, 2003, a lawsuit was filed against K&G in the Los Angeles Superior Court of California, Case No. BC294497 (the "Tailor's Suit"). The Tailor's Suit was brought as a multi-party action. The Tailor's Suit alleges several causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that in the State of California K&G misclassified the tailors working in their stores as "independent contractors" and refused to classify them as non-exempt employees subject to the application of certain California labor statutes. Because of this alleged misclassification, the Tailor's Suit alleges that K&G failed to pay hourly and overtime compensation and provide the required rest periods required by such labor statutes. The Tailor's Suit further alleges that K&G violated several other labor statutes and regulations as well as the California Unfair Competition Law. It seeks, among other things, restitution, disgorgement due to failure to comply with California labor laws, penalties, declaratory and injunctive relief. As a result of recent mediations, we recognized a charge in the fourth quarter of 2003 for $3.7 million ($2.3 million, net of tax) which we believe to be a reasonable estimate of the incremental cost we expect to incur in connection with the proposed resolution of the Suits and the Tailor's Suit. We believe that the Suits and the Tailor's Suit will be resolved in 2004; however, no assurance can be given that the anticipated resolution will be realized. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of the Suits or the Tailor's Suit will have a material adverse effect on our managersfinancial position, results of operations or cash flows. On April 1, 2004, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC313038 (the "PII Suit"). The PII Suit, which was brought as a purported class action, alleges two causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that the Company requests or requires, in conjunction with a customer's use of his or her credit card, the customer to provide personal identification information which is recorded upon the credit card transaction form. The PII Suit seeks: (i) civil penalties pursuant to the California Civil Code; (ii) an order enjoining the Company from requesting or requiring that a customer provide personal identification information which is then recorded on the transaction form; (iii) permanent and assistant managers were properly classifiedpreliminary injunctions against the Company requesting or requiring that a customer provide personal identification information which is then recorded on the transaction form; (iv) restitution of all funds allegedly acquired by means of any act or practice declared by the Court to be unlawful or fraudulent or to constitute a violation of the California Business and Professions Code; (v) attorney's fees; and (vi) costs of suit. The court has not yet decided whether the action may proceed as exempt under such statutes and, therefore, properly compensated.a class action. The Company believes that the Suits are without merit and intends to vigorously defend them.the PII Suit. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of the PII Suit will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 9 In addition, we are involved in various routine legal proceedings, including ongoing litigation, incidental to the conduct of our business. Management believes that none of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, or results of operations.operations or cash flows. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003. 9January 31, 2004. 10 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "MW." The following table sets forth, on a per share basis for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices per share for our common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange:
HIGH LOW ------ ------------------ ------------ FISCAL YEAR 2001 First quarter ended May 5, 2001........................... $32.49 $20.50 Second quarter ended August 4, 2001....................... 30.00 22.35 Third quarter ended November 3, 2001...................... 26.60 17.00 Fourth quarter ended February 2, 2002..................... 24.61 17.87 FISCAL YEAR 2002 First quarter ended May 4, 2002........................... $26.50 $20.292002....................... $ 26.50 $ 20.29 Second quarter ended August 3, 2002.......................2002................... 28.72 18.35 Third quarter ended November 2, 2002......................2002.................. 20.61 9.61 Fourth quarter ended February 1, 2003.....................2003................. 20.00 13.25 FISCAL YEAR 2003 First quarter ended May 3, 2003....................... $ 17.05 $ 11.76 Second quarter ended August 2, 2003................... 26.00 15.80 Third quarter ended November 1, 2003.................. 30.90 23.95 Fourth quarter ended January 31, 2004................. 31.25 21.41
On April 25, 2003,9, 2004, there were approximately 1,4501,580 holders of record and approximately 5,0145,900 beneficial holders of our common stock. We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and for the foreseeable future we currently intend to retain all of our earnings for the future operation and expansion of our business. Our credit agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends on our common stock (see Note 43 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). 10On October 21, 2003, we issued $130.0 million of 3.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 ("Notes") in a private placement to Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Fleet Securities, Inc., as initial purchasers. The Notes were offered only to "qualified institutional buyers", in accordance with Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. We received aggregate proceeds of $126.6 million, excluding the initial purchasers' discount. A portion of the net proceeds from the Notes was used to repay the outstanding indebtedness under our Canadian term credit agreement and to repurchase shares of our common stock under the program authorized by the Board in September 2003; the balance is reserved for general corporate purposes, which may include additional purchases of our common stock under our share repurchase program. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on April 15, 2004. The Notes will mature on October 15, 2023. However, holders may require us to purchase all or part of the Notes, for cash, at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount per Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on October 15, 2008, October 15, 2013 and October 15, 2018 or upon a designated event. Beginning on October 15, 2008, we will pay additional contingent interest on the Notes if the average trading price of the Notes is above a specified level during a specified period. In addition, we may redeem all or a portion of the Notes on or after October 20, 2008, at 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest, contingent interest and additional amounts, if any. We also have the right to redeem the Notes between October 20, 2006 and October 19, 2008 if the price of our common stock reaches certain levels. During certain periods, the Notes are convertible by holders into shares of our common stock initially at a conversion rate of 23.3187 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $42.88 per share of common stock (subject to adjustment in certain events), under the following circumstances: (1) if the closing sale price of our common stock issuable upon conversion exceeds 120% of the conversion price under specified conditions; (2) if we call the Notes for redemption; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions. Upon conversion of the Notes, in lieu of delivering common stock we may, at our election, deliver cash or a combination of cash and common stock. The Notes are general senior unsecured obligations, ranking on a parity in right of payment with all our existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness and our other general unsecured obligations, and senior in right of payment with all our future subordinated indebtedness. The Notes are effectively subordinated to all of our senior secured indebtedness, and all indebtedness and liabilities of our subsidiaries. 11 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following selected statement of earnings and balance sheet information for the fiscal years indicated has been derived from The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. (the "Company")our audited consolidated financial statements. The Selected Financial Data should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto. References herein to years are to the Company's 52-week or 53-week fiscal year, which ends on the Saturday nearest January 31 in the following calendar year. For example, references to "2002""2003" mean the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003.January 31, 2004. All fiscal years for which financial information is included herein had 52 weeks, except 2000 which had 53 weeks. Financial and operating data for all periods presented reflect the retroactive effect of the February 1999 combination with Moores Retail Group Inc. ("Moores") and the June 1999 combination with K&G Men's Center, Inc. ("K&G"), both accounted for as a pooling of interests (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)notes below).
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------2003 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND PER SQUARE FOOT DATA) STATEMENT OF EARNINGS DATA: Net sales................................ $1,037,831 $1,186,748 $1,333,501 $1,273,154 $1,295,049sales .................................. $ 1,186,748 $ 1,333,501 $ 1,273,154 $ 1,295,049 $ 1,392,680 Gross margin............................. 377,834margin ............................... 438,966 514,666 451,111 454,348 513,943 Operating income(5)...................... 95,045income (1) ....................... 100,931 141,158 73,841 69,392 Earnings before extraordinary item(5).... 50,142 55,95782,248 Net earnings (1) ........................... 53,045 84,661 43,276 42,412 Earnings50,026 Net earnings per share of common stock before extraordinary item(1)(5)(1): Basic..................................Basic .................................... $ 1.23 $ 1.341.27 $ 2.03 $ 1.06 $ 1.04 Diluted................................ $ 1.191.29 Diluted .................................. $ 1.321.25 $ 2.00 $ 1.04 $ 1.04 $ 1.27 Weighted average shares outstanding(1)... 40,738outstanding .............................. 41,848 41,769 40,997 40,590 38,789 Weighted average shares outstanding plus dilutive potential common shares(1)shares .... 42,964 42,452 42,401 41,446 40,877 39,295 OPERATING INFORMATION: Percentage increase/(decrease) in comparable US store sales(2)........... 9.6%sales (2) ............ 7.7% 3.3% (10.2)% (3.1)% 6.1% Percentage increase/(decrease) in comparable Canadian store sales(2)..... 2.1%sales (2) ................... 0.3% 8.3% 4.2% (2.1)% (5.1)% Average square footage --footage-- all stores(3).............................. 6,146stores (3) .... 6,193 6,520 7,046 7,174 7,411 Average sales per square foot of selling space(4)............................... $ 384space (4) ................................ $ 400 $ 406 $ 336 $ 319 $ 338 Number of retail apparel stores: Open at beginning of the period........ 526period ......... 579 614 651 680 Opened................................. 65689 Opened .................................. 54 39 32 16 Acquired............................... 4 --13 Acquired ................................ - 1 -- -- Closed................................. (16)- - - Closed .................................. (19) (3) (3) (7) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------(9) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Open at end of the period.............. 579period ............... 614 651 680 689 693 CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Capital expenditures..................... $ 53,474expenditures ....................... $ 47,506 $ 79,411 $ 64,777 $ 45,422 $ 48,700 Depreciation and amortization............ 26,761amortization .............. 30,082 34,689 41,949 44,284 48,130 Purchase of treasury stock............... 926stock ................. 1,273 7,871 30,409 28,058 109,186
1112
JANUARY 30, JANUARY 29, FEBRUARY 3, FEBRUARY 2, FEBRUARY 1, 1999JANUARY 31, 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION: Cash........................................ $ 31,012Cash.......................................... $ 77,798 $ 84,426 $ 38,644 $ 84,924 $ 132,146 Working capital............................. 230,624capital............................... 280,251 316,213 301,935 325,272 356,823 Total assets................................ 535,076assets.................................. 611,195 713,317 717,869 769,313 869,198 Long-term debt(6)........................... 44,870debt ............................... 46,697 42,645 37,740 38,709 131,000 Shareholders' equity........................ 351,455equity.......................... 408,973 494,987 509,883 531,761 493,460
- --------------- (1) AdjustedOn February 10, 1999, we combined with Moores, a privately owned Canadian corporation, in exchange for securities ("Exchangeable Shares") exchangeable for 2.5 million shares of our common stock. The Exchangeable Shares were issued to give effectthe shareholders and option Holders of Moores in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of capital stock and options of Moores because of Canadian tax law considerations. As of February 3, 2001, all Exchangeable Shares, which had substantially identical economic and legal rights as shares of our common stock, had been converted on a one-on-one basis to our common stock. As of January 29, 2000, there were 1.0 million Exchangeable Shares that had not yet been converted but were reflected as common stock outstanding for financial reporting purposes by the Company. The combination with Moores has been accounted for as a 50%pooling of interests. On June 1, 1999, we combined with K&G, a superstore retailer of men's apparel and accessories operating 34 stores in 16 states. We issued approximately 4.4 million shares of our common stock dividend effectedto K&G shareholders based on June 19, 1998.an exchange ratio of 0.43 of a share of our common stock for each share of K&G common stock outstanding. In addition, we converted the outstanding options to purchase K&G common stock, whether vested or unvested, into options to purchase 228,000 shares of our common stock based on the exchange ratio of 0.43. The combination has been accounted for as a pooling of interests. In 1999, in conjunction with the Moores and K&G combinations as discussed above, we recorded transaction costs of $7.7 million, duplicative store closing costs of $6.1 million and litigation costs of $0.9 million. These charges in total reduced operating income by $19.0 million and net earnings by $14.1 million; basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock were reduced by $0.34 and $0.33, respectively. In addition, we recorded a charge of $4.3 million related to the write-off of deferred financing costs and prepayment penalties for the refinancing of approximately US$57 million of Moores indebtedness. (2) Comparable store sales data is calculated by excluding the net sales of a store for any month of one period if the store was not open throughout the same month of the prior period. Fiscal year 2000 is calculated on a 52-week basis. (3) Average square footage -- all stores is calculated by dividing the total square footage for all stores open at the end of the period by the number of stores open at the end of such period. (4) Average sales per square foot of selling space is calculated by dividing total selling square footage for all stores open the entire year into total sales for those stores. (5) In 1999, in conjunction with the Moores and K&G combinations as discussed in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we recorded transaction costs of $7.7 million, duplicative store closing costs of $6.1 million and litigation costs of $0.9 million. These charges in total reduced operating income by $14.7 million and earnings before extraordinary item by $11.2 million; basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock before extraordinary item were reduced by $0.27 and $0.26, respectively. The transaction costs were composed primarily of investment banking fees, professional fees and contract termination payments, while the duplicative store closing costs consisted primarily of lease termination payments and the write-off of fixed assets associated with the closing of duplicate store sites in existing markets. The litigation charge resulted from the settlement of a lawsuit filed by a former K&G employee related to his employment relationship with K&G. In addition, we recorded an extraordinary charge of $2.9 million, net of a $1.4 million tax benefit, related to the write-off of deferred financing costs and prepayment penalties for the refinancing of approximately US$57 million of Moores' indebtedness. (6) In August 1998, the Company gave notice to the holders of its outstanding 5 1/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes (the "Notes") that the Company would redeem the Notes on September 14, 1998. As a result, $36.8 million principal amount of the Notes was converted into 1.6 million shares of the Company's common stock and $20.7 million principal amount was redeemed for an aggregate of $21.5 million. An extraordinary charge of $0.7 million, net of tax benefit of $0.5 million, related to the early retirement of the Notes in fiscal 1998 was recognized. 1213 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS GENERAL The Men's Wearhouse opened its first store in Houston, Texas in August 1973. The Company combined with Moores Retail Group Inc. ("Moores")1973, and we are now one of the largest specialty retailers of men's suits in February 1999the United States and with K&G Men's Center, Inc. ("K&G") in June 1999, with both combinations accounted for as a pooling of interests (see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).Canada. At February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, we operated 575693 retail apparel stores with 579 stores in the United States and 114 stores in Canada. We opened 39Our U.S. stores are primarily operated under the brand names of Men's Wearhouse (506 stores) and K&G (73 stores) in 2000, 3244 states and the District of Columbia. Our Canadian stores are operated under the brand name of Moores Clothing for Men in 2001 and 16 stores in 2002; in addition,ten provinces. For 2003, we acquired one store in 2000. Expansion is generally continued within a market as long as management believes it will provide profitable incremental sales volume. Historically, this growth has resulted in significant increases in net sales and has also contributed to increased net earnings. However, in 2001, we experienced a decrease in net saleshad revenues of $1.393 billion and net earnings primarily as a result of the declining US economy and the effects$50.0 million, compared to revenues of the events of September 11, 2001. The continued decline of the US and Canadian economies throughout fiscal year 2002 continued to impact net sales$1.295 billion and net earnings of $42.4 million in comparison to pre-2001 levels (see2002 and revenues of $1.273 billion and net earnings of $43.3 million in 2001. The more significant factors impacting these results are addressed in the "Results of Operations" discussion herein).below. Under the Men's Wearhouse and Moores brands, which contributed approximately 80% of our revenues, we target middle and upper-middle income men by offering quality merchandise at everyday low prices. Because we concentrate on men's "wear-to-work" business attire which is characterized by infrequent and more predictable fashion changes, we believe we are not as exposed to trends typical of more fashion-forward apparel retailers, where significant markdowns and promotional pricing are more common. In addition, because this inventory mix includes "business casual" merchandise, we are able to meet demand for such products resulting from the trend over the past decade toward more relaxed dress codes in the workplace. We also strive to provide a superior level of customer service by training our sales personnel as clothing consultants and offering on-site tailoring services in each of our stores. We believe that the quality, value, selection and service we provide to our Men's Wearhouse and Moores customers have been significant factors in enabling us to consistently gain valuable market share within both the U.S. and Canadian markets for men's tailored apparel. In addition, we have expanded our customer base and leveraged our existing infrastructure by completing the rollout of our tuxedo rental program to nearly all of our Men's Wearhouse stores in early 2002 and introducing the program in 48 Moores stores in late 2003. As a percentage of total revenues, tuxedo rentals have grown from 0.8% in 2001 to 2.5% in 2002 and 3.7% in 2003. These revenues are expected to continue to increase in 2004 as the program matures and is extended to the remaining Moores stores. Under the K&G brand, we target the more price sensitive customer with a value-oriented superstore approach. K&G's merchandising strategy emphasizes broad assortments of men's apparel across all major categories, including tailored clothing, casual sportswear, dress furnishings, footwear and accessories. In addition, 35 of the 73 K&G stores operating at January 31, 2004 offer ladies' career apparel that is also targeted to the more price sensitive customer. Although K&G employees assist customers with merchandise selection, including correct sizing, the stores are designed to allow customers to select and purchase apparel by themselves. Each store also provides on-site tailoring services. Like most retailers, our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically,In most years, more than 30% of our net sales and more than 45% of our net earnings have been generated during the fourth quarter of each year. Because of the seasonality of our business, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full year. We intendopened 32 stores in 2001, 16 stores in 2002 and 13 stores in 2003. Expansion is generally continued within a market as long as management believes it will provide profitable incremental sales volume. Historically, new stores have contributed significantly to continue our expansionincreases in newnet sales and existing markets. Wehave also contributed to increased net earnings. In 2004, we plan to open approximately 10eleven new Men's Wearhouse stores and seveneight new K&G stores in 2003, to close two Men's Wearhouse stores and six K&G stores and to expand and/or relocate approximately 19twelve existing Men's Wearhouse stores and fourone existing K&G stores.store. The average cost (excluding telecommunications and point-of-sale equipment and inventory) of opening a new store is expected to be approximately $0.3 million in 2003.2004. Although we believe that our ability to increase the number of Men's Wearhouse stores in the U.S. above 550 will be limited, we believe that additional growth opportunities exist through improving and diversifying the merchandise mix, relocating stores, expanding our K&G brand and adding complementary products and services. We have closed 13nineteen stores in the three years ended February 1, 2003.January 31, 2004. Generally, in determining whether to close a store, we consider the store's historical and projected performance and the continued desirability of the store's location. In determining store contribution, the Company considerswe consider net sales, cost of sales and other direct store costs, but excludesexclude buying costs, corporate overhead, depreciation and amortization, financing costs and advertising. Store 14 performance is continually monitored and, occasionally, as regions and shopping areas change, managementwe may determine that it is in our best interest to close or relocate a store. In 2000, three stores were closed due to substandard performance. In 2001, three stores were closed due to substandard performance or lease expiration. In 2002, five stores were closed due to substandard performance or lease expiration and two stores were closed when their operations were combined with other existing area stores. In 2003, nine stores were closed due to substandard performance. We plan to close approximately ten stores in 2004. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires the appropriate application of accounting policies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In many instances, this also requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts and disclosures included in our financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and various assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. However, since future events and conditions and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results will differ from our estimates and such differences could be material to our financial statements. Our accounting policies are described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We consistently apply these policies and periodically evaluate the reasonableness of our estimates in light of actual events. Historically, we have found our accounting policies to be appropriate and our estimates and assumptions reasonable. We believe our critical accounting policies and our most significant estimates are those that relate to inventories and long-lived assets, including goodwill, and our estimated liabilities for the self-insured portions of our workers' compensation and employee health benefit costs. 13 Our inventory is carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-outaverage cost method for approximately 80%79% of our inventory and on the retail inventory method for the remaining 20%21%. Our inventory cost also includes estimated procurement and distribution costs (warehousing, freight, hangers and merchandising costs) associated with the inventory, with the balance of such costs included in cost of sales. We make assumptions, based primarily on historical experience, as to items in our inventory that may be damaged, obsolete or salable only at marked down prices and reduce the cost of inventory to reflect the market value of these items. If actual damages, obsolescence or market demand is significantly different from our estimates, additional inventory write-downs could be required. In addition, procurement and distribution costs are allocated to inventory based on the ratio of annual product purchases to average inventory cost. If this ratio were to change significantly, it could materially affect the amount of procurement and distribution costs included in cost of sales. We make judgments about the carrying value of long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and amortizable intangibles, and the recoverability of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an other-than-temporary impairment in the remaining value of the assets recorded on our balance sheet may exist. We test for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances dictate. To estimate the fair value of long-lived assets, including goodwill, we make various assumptions about the future prospects for the brand that the asset relates to and typically estimate future cash flows to be generated by these brands. Based on these assumptions and estimates, we determine whether we need to take an impairment charge to reduce the value of the asset stated on our balance sheet to reflect its estimated fair value. Assumptions and estimates about future values and remaining useful lives are complex and often subjective. They can be affected by a variety of factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends, and internal factors such as changes in our business strategy and our internal forecasts. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact our reported financial results. We recorded no impairment charge as a result of our testing performed during 2002.2002 or 2003. We self-insure portions of our workers' compensation and employee medical costs. We estimate our liability for future payments under these programs based on historical experience and various assumptions as to participating employees, health care costs, number of claims and other factors, including industry trends and information provided to us by our insurance broker. We also use actuarial estimates with respect to workers' compensation. If the number of claims or the costs associated with those claims were to increase significantly over our estimates, additional charges to earnings could be necessary to cover required payments. 15 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth the Company's results of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated:
FISCAL YEAR --------------------- 2000---------------------------------- 2001 2002 ----- ----- -----2003 -------- -------- -------- Net sales...................................................sales ................................................ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of goods sold, including buying and occupancy costs.... 61.4costs.. 64.6 64.9 ----- ----- -----63.1 -------- -------- -------- Gross margin................................................ 38.6margin ............................................. 35.4 35.1 36.9 Selling, general and administrative expenses................ 28.0expenses ............. 29.6 29.7 ----- ----- -----31.0 -------- -------- -------- Operating income............................................ 10.6income ......................................... 5.8 5.4 5.9 Interest expense, net.......................................net .................................... 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 ----- ----- ------------- -------- -------- Earnings before income taxes................................ 10.5taxes ............................. 5.6 5.3 5.7 Provision for income taxes.................................. 4.2taxes ............................... 2.2 2.0 ----- ----- -----2.1 -------- -------- -------- Net earnings................................................ 6.3%earnings ............................................. 3.4% 3.3% ===== ===== =====3.6% ======== ======== ========
142003 COMPARED WITH 2002 The following table presents a breakdown of 2002 and 2003 net sales of the Company by stores open in each of these periods (in millions):
NET SALES -------------------------------------- INCREASE/ STORES 2002 2003 (DECREASE) ------ ---------- ---------- ---------- 13 stores opened in 2003 ..... $ -- $ 12.0 $ 12.0 16 stores opened in 2002 ..... 24.6 36.1 11.5 Stores opened before 2002 .... 1,270.4 1,344.6 74.2 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total .............. $ 1,295.0 $ 1,392.7 $ 97.7 ========== ========== ==========
The Company's net sales increased $97.7 million, or 7.5%, to $1.393 billion for 2003 due mainly to a $78.8 million increase in clothing and alteration sales and an $18.3 million increase in tuxedo rental revenues. Our U.S. comparable store sales (which are calculated by excluding the net sales of a store for any month of one period if the store was not open throughout the same month of the prior period) increased 6.1% as improvement was experienced in nearly all product categories. At our core Men's Wearhouse brand, a 14.9% increase in unit suit sales helped drive increases in other product categories as well as in alteration sales. In addition, our tuxedo rental business continued to grow following its rollout to nearly all of the Men's Wearhouse stores in early 2002 with tuxedo rental revenues increasing from 2.5% of total net sales in 2002 to 3.7% in 2003. Store traffic also increased, not only from our tuxedo rental customers, but also from efforts started in 2002 to increase our mix of opening price point product and to increase our penetration into the traditional clothing market. In Canada, comparable store sales for 2003 decreased 5.1% from 2002 due mainly to unusually severe and extended winter weather conditions during the first quarter, a shorter summer sale period during the second quarter and softer demand overall in the Canadian men's apparel market experienced throughout 2003. However, this decrease was more than offset by the foreign currency exchange rate translation effect from the strengthening of the Canadian dollar. Gross margin increased $59.6 million, or 13.1%, to $513.9 million in 2003. As a percentage of sales, gross margin increased from 35.1% in 2002 to 36.9% in 2003. This increase in gross margin percentage resulted mainly from continued growth in our tuxedo rental business, which carries a significantly higher incremental gross margin impact than our clothing sales, and from higher cumulative mark-ups that produced higher clothing product margins. The gross margin percentage was also increased as occupancy cost, which is relatively constant on a per store basis and includes store related rent, common area maintenance, utilities, repairs and maintenance, security, property taxes and depreciation, decreased modestly as a percentage of sales from 2002 to 2003. However, on an absolute dollar basis, occupancy costs increased by 5.1% from 2002 to 2003 due mainly to higher rent expense from our increased store count and renewals of existing leases at higher rates and increased depreciation. Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 31.0% in 2003 compared to 29.7% in 2002, with SG&A expenditures increasing by $46.7 million or 12.1% to $431.7 million. On an absolute dollar basis, advertising increased by $2.8 million, store salaries increased by $15.3 million and other SG&A increased by $28.6 million. As a percentage of sales, advertising expense decreased from 4.6% to 4.5%, store salaries increased from 12.1% to 12.3% and other SG&A expenses increased from 13.0% to 14.2%. On an absolute dollar basis, the principal components of SG&A expenses increased primarily due to (i) the elimination of 16 media spending reductions imposed in 2002, (ii) increased commissions and bonuses due to higher sales, (iii) increased store and warehouse salaries, benefits and other costs associated with a 47% increase in unit tuxedo rentals, (iv) increased non-store salaries, benefits and other costs related to our expansion strategies and (v) higher insurance costs. SG&A expenses were reduced by the recognition of a $4.4 million deferred pretax gain from the sale, in March 2002, of certain technology assets to an unrelated company regularly engaged in the development and licensing of software to the retail industry (see "Other Matters" herein). However, the gain recognized was more than offset by $2.9 million in costs related to store closures, $2.5 million in costs related to the write-off of certain technology assets and $3.7 million in litigation costs related to certain California lawsuits. Interest expense, net of interest income, increased from $1.3 million in 2002 to $2.5 million in 2003. Weighted average borrowings outstanding increased $30.2 million from the prior year to $70.0 million in 2003, and the weighted average interest rate on outstanding indebtedness decreased from 4.9% to 4.6%. The increase in the weighted average borrowings was due primarily to the issuance of $130.0 million of 3.125% Notes in a private placement on October 21, 2003. A portion of the proceeds from the Notes was used to repay the balance outstanding on our Canadian credit facility. The decrease in the weighted average interest rate was due primarily to the lower interest rate on the Notes. Interest expense was offset by interest income from the investment of excess cash of $1.0 million in 2002 and $1.5 million in 2003. See further discussion of the Notes in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" herein. Our effective income tax rate for the year ended January 31, 2004 was 37.3% compared to 37.8% for the prior year. The effective tax rate was higher than the statutory federal rate of 35% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes. These factors resulted in 2003 net earnings of $50.0 million or 3.6% of net sales, compared with 2002 net earnings of $42.4 million or 3.3% of net sales. 2002 COMPARED WITH 2001 The following table presents a breakdown of 2001 and 2002 net sales of the Company by stores open in each of these periods (in millions):
NET SALES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INCREASE/ STORES 2001 2002 (DECREASE) - ------ --------- ------------------ ---------- ---------- 16 stores opened in 2002..............................2002 ........ $ -- $ 24.6 $24.6$ 24.6 32 stores opened in 2001..............................2001 ........ 26.7 57.8 31.1 Stores opened before 2001.............................2001 ... 1,246.5 1,212.6 (33.9) -------- -------- ----- Total............................................ $1,273.2 $1,295.0 $21.8 ======== ======== =====---------- ---------- ---------- Total ............. $ 1,273.2 $ 1,295.0 $ 21.8 ========== ========== ==========
The Company's net sales increased $21.8 million, or 1.7%, to $1.295 billion for 2002 due primarily to increased sales in US stores opened in 2001 and 2002, offset partially by decreased sales from stores opened prior to fiscal 2001. Comparable store sales (which are calculated by excluding the net sales of a store for any month of one period if the store was not open throughout the same month of the prior period) for 2002 decreased 3.1% in the US and 2.1% in Canada from 2001. The decrease in comparable sales for the U.S. and Canadian stores was due mainly to continued weakness in the U.S. and Canadian economies. Sales of men's apparel is particularly affected since buying patterns for men are considered to be more discretionary than those in other apparel areas. Gross margin increased $3.2 million, or 0.7%, to $454.3 million in 2002. As a percentage of sales, gross margin decreased from 35.4% in 2001 to 35.1% in 2002. This decrease in gross margin percentage predominately resulted from an increase in occupancy cost (which is relatively constant on a per store basis) as a percentage of sales and higher markdowns at the Men's Wearhouse brand associated with a shift to merchandise with lower opening price points. This wasThese decreases in the gross margin percentage were offset in part by our higher margin tuxedo rental revenues increasing from 0.8% of total revenues in fiscal 2001 to 2.5% of total revenues in fiscal 2002. Selling, generalOccupancy cost, which includes store related rent, common area maintenance, utilities, repairs and administrative ("maintenance, security, property taxes and depreciation, increased by 8.9% on an absolute dollar basis from 2001 to 2002 due mainly to higher rent expense from our increased store count and renewals of existing leases at higher rates, higher property taxes and increased depreciation. SG&A")&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 29.7% in 2002 compared to 29.6% in 2001, with SG&A expenditures increasing by $7.7 million or 2.0% to $385.0 million. On an absolute dollar basis, advertising 17 decreased by $1.1 million, store salaries increased by $10.4 million and other SG&A decreased by $1.6 million. As a percentage of sales, advertising expense decreased from 4.8% to 4.6%, store salaries increased from 11.4% to 12.1% and other SG&A expenses decreased from 13.4% to 13.0%. The decrease in advertising was due to planned reductions in media spending. The increase in store salaries was the result of higher sales commission rates in 2002 for promotional and other merchandise sales categories. These commission rates were put in place to help drive the shift to lower opening price points for merchandise offerings at the Men's Wearhouse brand. Other SG&A expenses decreased due to our focus on reducing corporate overhead. Interest expense, net of interest income, decreased from $2.9 million in 2001 to $1.3 million in 2002. Weighted average borrowings outstanding decreased $25.5 million from the prior year to $39.8 million in 2002, and the weighted average interest rate on outstanding indebtedness decreased from 5.4% to 4.9%. The decrease in the weighted average borrowings resulted primarily from decreased short-term borrowings under our credit facilities. The decrease in the weighted average interest rate was due primarily to decreases during 2002 in the LIBOR rate. Interest expense was offset by interest income from the investment of excess cash of $0.8 million in 2001 and $1.0 million in 2002. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" discussion herein. Our effective income tax rate for the year ended February 1, 2003 was 37.8% compared to 39.0% for the prior year. The effective tax rate was higher than the statutory federal rate of 35% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes. These factors resulted in 2002 net earnings of $42.4 million or 3.3% of net sales, compared with 2001 net earnings of $43.3 million or 3.4% of net sales. 15 2001 COMPARED WITH 2000 The following table presents a breakdown of 2000 and 2001 net sales of the Company by stores open in each of these periods (in millions):
NET SALES -------------------------------- INCREASE/ STORES 2000 2001 (DECREASE) - ------ -------- -------- ---------- 32 stores opened in 2001.............................. $ -- $ 26.7 $ 26.7 40 stores opened or acquired in 2000.................. 37.6 74.4 36.8 Stores opened before 2000............................. 1,295.9 1,172.1 (123.8) -------- -------- ------- Total............................................ $1,333.5 $1,273.2 $ (60.3) ======== ======== =======
The Company's net sales decreased $60.3 million, or 4.5%, to $1.273 billion for 2001 due primarily to decreased sales in US stores open prior to fiscal year 2000, offset by increased sales from stores opened in 2000 and 2001. Comparable store sales for 2001 decreased 10.2% in the US and increased 4.2% in Canada from 2000. The decrease in comparable sales for the US stores was due mainly to the declining US economy. Sales of men's tailored apparel are particularly affected since buying patterns for men are considered to be more discretionary than those in other apparel areas. The negative effect of the terrorist events of September 11, 2001 on retail and numerous other business sectors also contributed to the decline. Gross margin decreased $63.6 million, or 12.3%, to $451.1 million in 2001. As a percentage of sales, gross margin decreased from 38.6% in 2000 to 35.4% in 2001. This decrease in gross margin predominately resulted from an increase in occupancy cost (which is relatively constant on a per store basis) as a percentage of sales and a larger percentage of the sales mix being contributed by our lower margin K&G brand. SG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 29.6% in 2001 compared to 28.0% in 2000, with SG&A expenditures increasing by $3.8 million or 1.0% to $377.3 million. On an absolute dollar basis, the principal components of SG&A expenses increased primarily due to our growth in number of stores and increased infrastructure support costs. As a percentage of sales, advertising expense decreased from 5.2% to 4.8%, store salaries increased from 11.1% to 11.4% and other SG&A expenses increased from 11.7% to 13.4%. Interest expense, net of interest income, increased from $0.8 million in 2000 to $2.9 million in 2001. Weighted average borrowings outstanding increased $15.4 million from the prior year to $65.3 million in 2001, and the weighted average interest rate on outstanding indebtedness decreased from 7.1% to 5.4%. The increase in the weighted average borrowings resulted primarily from increased short-term borrowings under our credit facilities. The decrease in the weighted average interest rate was due primarily to decreases during 2001 in the LIBOR rate. Interest expense was offset by interest income from the investment of excess cash of $2.8 million in 2000 and $0.8 million in 2001. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" discussion herein. Our effective income tax rate for the year ended February 2, 2002 was 39.0% compared to 39.7% for the prior year. The effective tax rate was higher than the statutory federal rate of 35% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes. These factors resulted in 2001 net earnings of $43.3 million or 3.4% of net sales, compared with 2000 net earnings of $84.7 million or 6.3% of net sales. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES In January 2003, we replaced our existing $125.0 million revolving credit facility which was scheduled to mature in February 2004 with a new revolving credit agreement with a group of banks (the "Credit Agreement") that provides for borrowing of up to $100.0 million through February 4, 2006.2006 (with extensions for up to two years under certain conditions). The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the stock of the subsidiaries of The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. Advances under the new Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, the agent's prime rate or the reserve adjusted LIBOR rate plus a varying interest rate margin.margin up to 2.25%. The Credit Agreement also provides for fees applicable to unused commitments.commitments ranging from 0.275% to 0.500%. The terms and conditions of the new Credit Agreement are 16 substantially the same as those of the replaced facility. In addition, in January 2003, we entered into a new Canadian term credit agreement under which we borrowed Can $62.0 million (US $40.7 million) which was used to repay approximately Can $60.9 million (US $40.0 million) in outstanding indebtedness of Moores under the previous term credit agreement. On October 31, 2003, we repaid the outstanding indebtedness of Can $60.5 million (US $45.9 million). As of February 2, 2002 and February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, there waswere no indebtednessborrowings outstanding under the respective credit facilities.Credit Agreement. The new Credit Agreement contains variouscertain restrictive and financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain a minimum level of net worth and certain financial ratios. The Credit Agreement also prohibits payment of cash dividends on our common stock. We are in compliance with the covenants in the Credit Agreement. In addition, inAgreement as of January 31, 2004. On October 21, 2003, we entered intoissued $130.0 million of 3.125% Notes in a new Canadian credit facility which is a term credit agreement under which we borrowed Can$62.0 million (US$40.7 million). The term credit borrowing is payable in quarterly installmentsprivate placement. A portion of Can$0.8 million (US$0.5 million) beginning May 2003, with the remaining unpaid principal payable on February 4, 2008. Borrowings undernet proceeds from the new term credit agreement wereNotes was used to repay approximately Can$60.9 million (US$40.0 million) inthe outstanding indebtedness of Moores under the previousour Canadian term credit agreement and to fund financing requirementsrepurchase shares of Moores.our common stock under the program authorized by the Board in September 2003 (see below); the balance is reserved for general corporate purposes, which may include additional purchases of our common stock under our share repurchase program. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on April 15, 2004. The effectiveNotes will mature on October 15, 2023. However, holders may require us to purchase all or part of the Notes, for cash, at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount per Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on October 15, 2008, October 15, 2013 and October 15, 2018 or upon a designated event. Beginning on October 15, 2008, we will pay additional contingent interest on the Notes if the average trading price of the Notes is above a specified level during a specified period. In addition, we may redeem all or a portion of the Notes on or after October 20, 2008, at 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest, contingent interest and additional amounts, if any. We also have the right to redeem the Notes between October 20, 2006 and October 19, 2008 if the price of our common stock reaches certain levels. 18 During certain periods, the Notes are convertible by holders into shares of our common stock initially at a conversion rate of 23.3187 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $42.88 per share of common stock (subject to adjustment in certain events), under the following circumstances: (1) if the closing sale price of our common stock issuable upon conversion exceeds 120% of the conversion price under specified conditions; (2) if we call the Notes for redemption; or (3) upon the term credit borrowing was 2.8%occurrence of specified corporate transactions. Upon conversion of the Notes, in lieu of delivering common stock we may, at our election, deliver cash or a combination of cash and 4.3% at February 2, 2002common stock. The Notes are general senior unsecured obligations, ranking on a parity in right of payment with all our existing and February 1,future unsecured senior indebtedness and our other general unsecured obligations, and senior in right of payment with all our future subordinated indebtedness. The Notes are effectively subordinated to all of our senior secured indebtedness, and all indebtedness and liabilities of our subsidiaries. In December 2003, respectively. Covenantswe acquired the assets and operating leases for 13 retail dry cleaning and laundry facilities and issued a note payable for $1.0 million as partial consideration. The unsecured note payable is due in full in 2008 and interest rates for the term credit agreement are substantially similar to those contained in our new Credit Agreement. As of February 2, 2002 and February 1, 2003, there was US$40.1 million and US$40.7 million outstanding under these term credit agreements, respectively.compounds annually at 4.0%. Our primary sources of working capital are cash flow from operations and borrowings under the Credit Agreement. We had working capital of $316.2 million, $301.9 million, $325.3 million and $325.3$356.8 million at the end of 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively. Historically, our working capital has been at its lowest level in January and February, and has increased through November as inventory buildup is financed with both vendor payables and credit facility borrowings in preparation for the fourth quarter selling season. Working capital at the end of fiscal year 2003 is higher than fiscal year 2001 and 2002 due mainly to our increased inventory levels and cash balances. Our operating activities provided net cash of $94.7 million and $52.3 million in 20002001, $113.0 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively, as$118.8 million in 2003 mainly because cash provided by net earnings, as adjusted for non-cash charges, and increases in payables wasand accrued expenses more than offset by increases in inventories andcash used for other assets, inventories (2001 and in 2001, a decrease2003) and decreases in income taxes payable. Inventoriespayable (2001 and 2002). Inventory increased $36.6 million in 2000 and $22.8 million in 2001, due to seasonal inventory buildup, the addition of inventory for new stores and stores expected to be openedbut decreased $17.3 million in the following quarter and the purchase of fabric used in the direct sourcing of inventory. Other assets increased primarily due to increased investment in tuxedo rental merchandise, while income taxes payable decreased in 2001 mainly due to reduced earnings. During 2002, our operating activities provided net cash of $113.0 million due mainly to net earnings, adjusted for non-cash charges, a decrease in inventories and an2002. A modest increase in payables, offset partially by an increase in other assets and a decrease in income taxes payable. Our 4.5% decrease in net sales in fiscal 2001,2002, combined with our inventory levels at the end of fiscal 2001 and our modest increase in net sales in fiscal 2002, have resulted in lower planned inventory purchases. We also modifieda modification to our inventory mix at our Men's Wearhouse stores to increase our offering of opening price point product. As a result, theproduct, resulted in lower planned inventory builduppurchases through fiscal 2002 was not as significant as that typically experienced during prior years and our balancemost of inventory at year end was less than our fiscal 2001 year end balance. Our payables, however, increased as2002. However, our buying patterns normalized in the last quarter of 2002.2002 and resulted in an increase of $19.5 million in payables and accrued expenses for the year. In 2003, inventories increased $21.6 million as sales increased and we continued our normal buying patterns. The 2003 increase of $35.5 million in payables and accrued expenses was due to the increased inventories as well as higher bonuses earned as a result of increased sales and higher insurance costs. Other assets increased in each of the years primarily due to increased investment in tuxedo rental merchandise, while incomemerchandise. Income taxes payable decreased in 2001 and 2002 mainly due to reduced earnings in 2001 and a lower effective tax rate associated with the mix of federal and state earnings.earnings in 2002; the increase in income taxes payable in 2003 resulted from increased earnings and the timing of tax payments, offset in part by a further reduction in the effective tax rate. Our investing activities used net cash of $83.4 million, $66.4 million, and $41.2 million and $54.8 million in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively, due mainly to capital expenditures of $79.4 million, $64.8 million, and $45.4 million and $48.7 million in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively. Our capital expenditures relate to costs incurred for stores opened, remodeled or relocated during the year or under construction at the end of the year, distribution facility additions and infrastructure technology investments. However, during 2002, cash used for capital expenditures was partially offset by $6.8 million of net proceeds received from the sale of substantially all of thecertain technology assets of Chelsea Market Systems, L.L.C. ("Chelsea") to an unrelated company regularly engaged in the development and licensing of software to the retail industry. As a result of the sale of Chelsea, and after giving effect to the settlement of a related lawsuit, the Company received net proceeds of $6.8 million. Approximately $4.4 million of this amount will bewas recognized as a pretax operating gain by the Company pending the lapse of certain indemnification provisions related to the assets sold, in the first quarter of 2003 (see "Other Matters" herein). 17During 2003, our cash used by investing activities also included $4.5 million for net assets acquired. 19 The following table details our capital expenditures (in millions):
2000 2001 2002 ----- ----- -----2003 -------- -------- -------- New store construction...................................... $15.9 $13.3construction ........................... $ 13.3 $ 5.7 $ 7.9 Relocation and remodeling of existing stores................ 28.9stores ..... 27.8 23.6 15.0 Information technology...................................... 18.2technology ........................... 13.2 8.4 11.5 Distribution facilities..................................... 10.0facilities .......................... 6.4 3.4 Other....................................................... 6.412.2 Other ............................................ 4.1 4.3 ----- ----- ----- Total.................................................. $79.4 $64.8 $45.4 ===== ===== =====2.1 -------- -------- -------- Total ........................................ $ 64.8 $ 45.4 $ 48.7 ======== ======== ========
Property additions relating to new retail apparel stores include stores in various stages of completion at the end of the fiscal year (two stores at the end of 2000, three(three stores at the end of 2001, and no stores at the end of 2002)2002 and eight stores at the end of 2003). Our expenditures for the relocation and remodeling of existing retail apparel stores continue to be substantial as we have opened fewer new stores. Capital expenditures in 2003 also include approximately $9.0 million for expansion of our tuxedo distribution facility and additional material handling equipment and $1.9 million for two new concept stores under construction at the end of 2003. We used net cash in financing activities of $4.7 million in 2000, $30.7 million in 2001 and $26.6 million in 2002 mainly for net payments of long-term debt and purchases of treasury stock. As previously noted, we entered into a new Canadian credit facility which iswas a term credit agreement under which we borrowed Can$62CAN$62.0 million (US$40.7(US $40.7 million) in January 2003. Borrowings under the term credit agreement were used to repay approximately Can$CAN$60.9 million (US$40.0(US $40.0 million) in outstanding indebtedness of Moores under the previous term credit agreement. In 2003, net cash used in financing activities was $19.7 million due mainly to proceeds received from the issuance of the Notes in October 2003 and proceeds from the issuance of our common stock for options exercised, offset by purchases of treasury stock and the repayment of our Canadian term loan. The treasury stock purchases were made under stock repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors in January 2000, January 2001, November 2002 and September 2003. Under the first three authorized programs, we repurchased 1,185,000, 1,480,000 and 1,057,100 shares of our common stock during 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively, at a cost of $30.4 million, $28.1 million and $24.1 million, respectively. The average price per share of our common stock repurchased under these programs was $25.66, $18.96 and $22.80 during 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. In September 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to one million shares in the open market or in private transactions, dependent on the market price and other considerations. On January 31, 2001, the Board of Directors authorized an expansion of the stock repurchase program for up to an additional two million shares of our common stock. During 2000, 2001 and 2002, we repurchased 335,000, 1,185,000 and 1,480,000 shares of our common stock under this program at a cost of $7.9 million, $30.4 million and $28.1 million, respectively. In November 2002, the Board of Directors authorized a new program for the repurchase of up to $25.0$100.0 million of Company common stock in the open market or in private transactions. This authorization superceded the approximately $1 million we had remaining under the Board's November 2002 authorization. As of February 24, 2003, no sharesJanuary 31, 2004, we had yet been repurchased under this program.program 1,405,400 shares at a cost of $42.4 million in private transactions and 1,713,400 shares at a cost of $42.6 million in open market transactions. Under all programs during fiscal 2003, we repurchased 4,175,900 shares of our common stock at a cost of $109.2 million with an average repurchase price of $26.15 per share. In connection with our share repurchase programs, we have from time to time issued put option contracts and received premiums for doing so, with the premiums being added to our capital in excess of par and effectively reducing the cost of our share repurchases. Under these contracts, the contract counterparties havehad the option to require us to purchase a specific number of shares of our common stock at specific strike prices per share on specific dates. During 2000,2002, we issued three separate contractsa put contract for a total of 650,000 shares and received premiums of $0.9 million. However, the contracts expired unexercised and all of the 335,000 shares we repurchased for $7.9 million in 2000 were acquired in open market transactions. During 2002, we repurchased 980,000 shares of our stock for $16.7 million in the open market and 500,000 shares for $11.4 million through settlement of an option contract. Weand received a premium of $0.6 million for issuing this contract. The contract counterparty had the option to exercise this contract at a strike price of $22.76 per share on December 17, 2002, but contract completion was required earlier if the market price of our common stock fell below a trigger price of $12.64 per share. During the third quarter of 2002, the market price of our common stock fell below the trigger price and we settled the contract. 18 contract by repurchasing the 500,000 shares at $22.76 per share or $11.4 million; we recorded the shares purchased as treasury stock. We were not obligated to issue any shares under the put contract nor were we obligated to settle in cash. Our primary cash requirements are to finance working capital increases as well as to fund capital expenditure requirements which are anticipated to be approximately $50$57.0 million for 2003.2004. This amount includes the anticipated costs of opening approximately 10eleven new Men's Wearhouse stores and seveneight new K&G stores in 20032004 at an expected average cost per store of approximately $0.3 million (excluding telecommunications and point-of-sale equipment and inventory). It also includes approximately $10.0 million for expansiondevelopment of distribution facilities in Houston for our tuxedo distribution facilityK&G brand and additional material handling equipment.future business models. The balance of the capital expenditures for 20032004 will be used for telecommunications, point-of-sale and other computer equipment and systems, store relocations, remodeling and expansion and infrastructure expansion to support our tuxedo rental business.investment in complimentary services and concepts. The Company anticipates that each of the 10eleven new Men's Wearhouse stores and each of the seveneight new K&G stores will require, on average, an initial inventory costing approximately $0.4$0.3 million and $1.2$1.1 million, respectively (subject to the same seasonal patterns affecting inventory at all stores), which will be funded by our revolving credit facility, trade 20 credit and cash from operations. The actual amount of future capital expenditures and inventory purchases will depend in part on the number of new stores opened and the terms on which new stores are leased. Additionally, the continuing consolidation of the men's tailored clothing industry and recent financial difficulties of significant menswear retailers may present us with opportunities to acquire retail chains significantly larger than our past acquisitions. Any such acquisitions may be undertaken as an alternative to opening new stores. We may use cash on hand, together with cash flow from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and issuances of equity securities, to take advantage of significant acquisition opportunities. We anticipate that our existing cash and cash flow from operations, supplemented by borrowings under our various credit agreements, will be sufficient to fund planned store openings, other capital expenditures and operating cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. As substantially all of our cash is held by five financial institutions, we are exposed to risk of loss in the event of failure of any of these parties. However, due to the creditworthiness of these five financial institutions, we anticipate full performance and access to our deposits and liquid investments. In connection with our direct sourcing program, we may enter into purchase commitments that are denominated in a foreign currency (primarily the Euro). We generally enter into forward exchange contracts to reduce the risk of currency fluctuations related to such commitments. As these forward exchange contracts are with two financial institutions, we are exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by these parties. However, due to the creditworthiness of these major financial institutions, full performance is anticipated. We may also be exposed to market risk as a result of changes in foreign exchange rates. This market risk should be substantially offset by changes in the valuation of the underlying transactions. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS As of January 31, 2004, the Company is obligated to make cash payments in connection with its long-term debt, operating leases and purchase obligations in the amounts listed below. In addition, we utilize letters of credit primarily for inventory purchases. At January 31, 2004, letters of credit totaling approximately $17.3 million were issued and outstanding.
<1 1-3 3-5 >5 CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS Total Year Years Years Years - -------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Long-term debt (a) $ 131.0 $ - $ - $ 1.0 $ 130.0 Operating lease base rentals (b) 454.4 91.8 152.7 107.2 102.7 Purchase obligations (c) 15.4 15.4 - - - -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total contractual obligations $ 600.8 $ 107.2 $ 152.7 $ 108.2 $ 232.7 ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
(a) Long-term debt includes our $130.0 million convertible senior notes issued in October 2003 and a $1.0 million unsecured note payable due in 2008. These borrowings are further described in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The table assumes our long-term debt is held to maturity. (b) We lease retail business locations, office and warehouse facilities, copier equipment and automotive equipment under operating leases. Leases on retail business locations specify minimum base rentals plus common area maintenance charges and possible additional rentals based upon percentages of sales. Most of the retail business location leases provide for renewal options at rates specified in the leases. Our future operating lease obligations would change if we exercised these renewal options and if we entered into additional operating lease agreements. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. (c) Included in purchase obligations are our forward exchange contracts. At January 31, 2004, we had 23 contracts maturing in varying increments to purchase an aggregate notional amount of $15.4 million in foreign currency, maturing at various dates through January 2005. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS Other than the operating leases, forward exchange contracts and letters of credit discussed above, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that are material to its financial position or results of operations. 21 OTHER MATTERS In January 2000, we formed Chelsea Market Systems, L.L.C. ("Chelsea"), a joint venture company, ("Chelsea") for the purpose of developing a new point-of-sale software system for the Company and after successful implementation, exploring the possibility of marketing the system to third parties. Under the terms of the agreement forming Chelsea, we owned 50% of Chelsea and Harry M. Levy, a former director and officer, owned 50% with the understanding that the officerMr. Levy would assign, either directly or indirectly, some of his interest in Chelsea to other persons involved in the project. The point-of-sale system was developed and successfully deployed by the Company during 2000 and 2001. From January 2000 though March 2002, we funded and recognized as expense all of the operating costs of Chelsea, which aggregated $4.5 million. On March 31, 2002, Chelsea sold substantially all of its assets, primarily certain technology assets, to an unrelated company regularly engaged in the development and licensing of software to the retail industry. As a result of the sale by Chelsea, and after giving effect to the settlement of the lawsuit, the Company received a net amount of $6.8 million. Approximately $4.4 million of this amount will bewas recognized as a pretax operating gain by the Company pending the lapse of certain indemnification provisions related to the assets sold, in the first quarter of 2003. IMPACT OF NEWRECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 2001,December 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ("SFAS 143"). SFAS 143 addresses the accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs and is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. 19 In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145, "Rescissionrevised interpretation of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections" ("SFAS 145"). SFAS 145 rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," FASB Statement No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers" and FASB Statement No. 64, "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements". In addition, SFAS 145 amends FASB Statement No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This statement also makes non-substantive technical corrections to existing pronouncements. SFAS 145 is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Financial Interpretation No. 46, ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (revised December 2003)" ("FIN 4646R"). FIN 46R requires that if an entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and results of activities of the variable interest entity should be included in the consolidated financial statements of the entity. FIN 46 requires that its provisions are46R is effective immediately for all arrangements entered intonew variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. WeFor variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46R must be applied no later than December 31, 2003 for entities meeting the definition of special-purpose entities, and no later than fiscal periods ending after March 15, 2004 for all other entities under construction. As we do not have any variable interest entities, created after January 31, 2003. For any arrangements entered into prior to January 31, 2003, the FIN 46 provisions are required to be adopted at the beginning of the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of FIN 4646R is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, or results of operations.operations or cash flows. INFLATION The impact of inflation on the Company has been minimal. 22 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements made herein and in other public filings and releases by the Company contain "forward-looking" information (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) that involveinvolves risk and uncertainty. These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, future capital expenditures, acquisitions (including the amount and nature thereof), future sales, earnings, margins, costs, number and costs of store openings, demand for clothing, market trends in the retail clothing business, currency fluctuations, inflation and various economic and business trends. Forward-looking statements may be made by management orally or in writing, including, but not limited to, this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section and other sections of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. Actual results and trends in the future may differ materially depending on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, domestic and international economic activity and inflation, our successful execution of internal operating plans and new store and new market expansion plans, performance issues with key suppliers, severe weather, foreign currency fluctuations, government export and import policies and legal proceedings. Future results will also be dependent upon our ability to continue to identify and complete successful expansions and penetrations into existing and new markets and our ability to integrate such expansions with our existing operations. 20Expansion into more fashion-oriented merchandise categories or into complementary products and services may present greater risks. We are continuously assessing opportunities to expand complementary products and services related to our traditional business, such as corporate apparel sales and retail dry cleaning establishments, as well as concepts that include more fashion-oriented merchandise. We may expend both capital and personnel resources on such business opportunities which may or may not be successful. Our business is particularly sensitive to economic conditions and consumer confidence. Consumer confidence is often adversely impacted by many factors including local, regional or national economic conditions, continued threats of terrorism, acts of war and other uncertainties. We believe that a decrease in consumer spending will affect us more than other retailers because men's discretionary spending for items like tailored apparel tends to slow faster than other retail purchases. According to industry sources, sales in the men's tailored clothing market generally have declined over the past several years. We believe that this decline is attributable primarily to: (1) men allocating less of their income to tailored clothing and (2) certain employers relaxing their dress codes. We believe that this decrease in sales has contributed, and will continue to contribute, to a consolidation among retailers of men's tailored clothing. Despite this overall decline, we have been able to increase our share of the men's tailored clothing market; however, we may not be able to continue to expand our sales volume or maintain our profitability within our segment of the retailing industry. 23 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK We are subject to exposure from fluctuations in U.S. dollar/Euro exchange rates. As further described in Note 98 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and "ItemItem 7, Management's"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Information and Results of Operations --- Liquidity and Capital Resources", we utilize foreign currency forward exchange contracts to limit exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. At January 31, 2004, we had 23 contracts maturing in varying increments to purchase an aggregate notional amount of $15.4 million in foreign currency, maturing at various dates through January 2005. At February 1, 2003, we had four contracts maturing in varying increments to purchase an aggregate notional amount of $1.4 million in foreign currency, maturing at various dates through March 2003. At February 2, 2002, we had 20 contracts maturing in varying increments to purchase an aggregate notional amount of $16.9 million in foreign currency. Unrealized pretax losses on these forward contracts totaled approximately $1.2 million at February 2, 2002. Unrealized pretax gains on these forward contracts totaled approximately $0.2 million at February 1, 2003. Unrealized pretax gains on these forward contracts totaled approximately $1.0 million at January 31, 2004. A hypothetical 10% change in applicable February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 forward rates would increase or decrease this pretax lossgain by approximately $0.1$1.5 million related to these positions. However, it should be noted that any change in the value of these contracts, whether real or hypothetical, would be significantly offset by an inverse change in the value of the underlying hedged item. Moores conducts its business in Canadian dollars. The exchange rate between Canadian dollars and U.S. dollars has fluctuated over the last ten years. If the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar weakens, then the revenues and earnings of our Canadian operations will be reduced when they are translated to U.S. dollars. Also, the value of our Canadian net assets in U.S. dollars may decline. We are also subject to market risk due to our long-term floating rate term loan of US $40.7 million at February 1, 2003 (see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). An increase in market interest rates would increase our interest expense and our cash requirements for interest payments. For example, an average increase of 0.5% in the variable interest rate would increase our interest expense and payments by approximately $0.2 million. 2124 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors and StockholdersShareholders of The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. Houston, Texas We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, and February 2, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders'earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2003.January 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, and February 2, 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for its foreign currency forward exchange contracts effective February 4, 2001, to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" and also changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective February 3, 2002 to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," as amended. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Houston, Texas February 24, 2003 22April 5, 2004 25 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
FEBRUARY 2, FEBRUARY 1, 2002 2003 ----------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARES)
FEBRUARY 1, JANUARY 31, 2003 2004 ----------- ---------- ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash...................................................... $ 38,644Cash ........................................................ $ 84,924 Inventories............................................... 375,471$ 132,146 Accounts receivable, net .................................... 20,004 17,919 Inventories ................................................. 360,159 388,956 Other current assets...................................... 37,220 49,499 --------- ---------assets ........................................ 29,495 30,858 ----------- ---------- Total current assets................................... 451,335assets ..................................... 494,582 --------- ---------569,879 ----------- ---------- PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, AT COST: Land...................................................... 5,778Land ........................................................ 6,005 Buildings................................................. 23,1996,205 Buildings ................................................... 23,729 29,739 Leasehold improvements.................................... 154,398improvements ...................................... 162,734 177,466 Furniture, fixtures and equipment......................... 203,154equipment ........................... 213,391 --------- --------- 386,529241,742 ----------- ----------- 405,859 455,152 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization............ (175,475)amortization .............. (195,679) --------- ---------(240,088) ----------- ----------- Net property and equipment............................. 211,054equipment ............................... 210,180 --------- ---------215,064 ----------- ----------- GOODWILL, net ................................................. 36,607 43,867 OTHER ASSETS, net........................................... 55,480 64,551 --------- --------- TOTAL................................................ $ 717,869net ............................................. 27,944 40,388 ----------- ----------- TOTAL ............................................... $ 769,313 ========= =========$ 869,198 =========== =========== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable.......................................... $ 87,381payable ............................................ $ 98,716 $ 115,828 Accrued expenses.......................................... 44,033expenses ............................................ 55,323 71,132 Current portion of long-term debt......................... 2,359debt ........................... 2,037 -- Income taxes payable...................................... 15,627payable ........................................ 13,234 --------- ---------26,096 ----------- ----------- Total current liabilities.............................. 149,400liabilities ................................ 169,310 213,056 LONG-TERM DEBT.............................................. 37,740DEBT ................................................ 38,709 131,000 DEFERRED TAXES AND OTHER LIABILITIES........................ 20,846LIABILITIES .......................... 29,533 --------- ---------31,682 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities...................................... 207,986liabilities ........................................ 237,552 --------- ---------375,738 ----------- ----------- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 9) SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, 1 share issued.............................no shares issued ......................................... -- -- Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 42,368,71542,585,179 and 42,585,17943,054,815 shares issued.... 424issued ...... 426 431 Capital in excess of par.................................. 191,888par .................................... 196,146 205,636 Retained earnings......................................... 355,128earnings ........................................... 397,540 447,566 Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income............. (3,198)income ...................... 66 --------- --------- Total.................................................. 544,24210,533 ----------- ----------- Total .................................................... 594,178 664,166 Treasury stock, 1,365,3642,845,364 and 2,845,3646,979,423 shares at cost.... (34,359)cost ..... (62,417) --------- ---------(170,706) ----------- ----------- Total shareholders' equity............................. 509,883equity ............................... 531,761 --------- --------- TOTAL................................................ $ 717,869493,460 ----------- ----------- TOTAL ............................................... $ 769,313 ========= =========$ 869,198 =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2326 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 3, 2001, FEBRUARY 2, 2002, AND FEBRUARY 1, 2003
FISCAL YEAR ------------------------------------------ 2000 2001 2002 ------------ ------------ ------------AND JANUARY 31, 2004 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
FISCAL YEAR ------------------------------------ 2001 2002 2003 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net sales................................................ $1,333,501sales ................................................. $1,273,154 $1,295,049 $1,392,680 Cost of goods sold, including buying and occupancy costs.................................................. 818,835costs .. 822,043 840,701 878,737 ---------- ---------- ---------- Gross margin............................................. 514,666margin .............................................. 451,111 454,348 513,943 Selling, general and administrative expenses............. 373,508expenses .............. 377,270 384,956 431,695 ---------- ---------- ---------- Operating income......................................... 141,158income .......................................... 73,841 69,392 82,248 Interest expense (net of interest income of $2,845, $841, $981 and $981,$1,495, respectively)................................ 839 .................... 2,867 1,261 2,511 ---------- ---------- ---------- Earnings before income taxes............................. 140,319taxes .............................. 70,974 68,131 79,737 Provision for income taxes............................... 55,658taxes ................................ 27,698 25,719 29,711 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net earnings............................................. $ 84,661earnings .............................................. $ 43,276 $ 42,412 $ 50,026 ========== ========== ========== Net earnings per share: Basic.................................................. $ 2.03Basic ................................................... $ 1.06 $ 1.04 $ 1.29 ========== ========== ========== Diluted................................................ $ 2.00Diluted ................................................. $ 1.04 $ 1.04 $ 1.27 ========== ========== ========== Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic.................................................. 41,769Basic ................................................... 40,997 40,590 38,789 ========== ========== ========== Diluted................................................ 42,401Diluted ................................................. 41,446 40,877 39,295 ========== ========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2427 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 3, 2001, FEBRUARY 2, 2002, AND FEBRUARY 1, 2003 AND JANUARY 31. 2004 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARES)
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OTHER COMMON IN EXCESS RETAINED COMPREHENSIVE TREASURY STOCK OF PAR EARNINGS (LOSS) INCOME STOCK TOTAL ------ --------- ----------------- ------------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARES)--------- ---------- BALANCE -- January 29, 2000.................. $409 $182,662 $227,191 $ 59 $ (1,348) $408,973 Comprehensive income: Net earnings............................. -- -- 84,661 -- -- 84,661 Translation adjustment................... -- -- -- (375) -- (375) -------- Total comprehensive income............. 84,286 Common stock issued to stock discount plan -- 44,713 shares.................... -- 1,020 -- -- -- 1,020 Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options -- 248,653 shares................ 3 3,874 -- -- -- 3,877 Common stock withheld to satisfy tax withholding liabilities of optionees -- 3,890 shares............................. -- (109) -- -- -- (109) Conversion of exchangeable shares to common stock -- 984,353 shares.................. 10 (10) -- -- -- -- Tax benefit recognized upon exercise of stock options............................ -- 1,382 -- -- -- 1,382 Proceeds from sale of option contracts..... -- 929 -- -- -- 929 Treasury stock purchased -- 335,000 shares................................... -- -- -- -- (7,871) (7,871) Treasury stock issued to profit sharing plan -- 103,627 shares................... -- (92) -- -- 2,592 2,500 ---- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- BALANCE -- February 3, 2001..................2001.............. $ 422 $ 189,656 $ 311,852 $ (316) $ (6,627) $ 494,987 Comprehensive income: Net earnings.............................earnings......................... -- -- 43,276 -- -- 43,276 Translation adjustment...................adjustment............... -- -- -- (2,157) -- (2,157) Cumulative effect of accounting change on derivative instruments.................instruments... -- -- -- (331) -- (331) Change in derivative fair value..........value...... -- -- -- (394) -- (394) ------------------ Total comprehensive income.............income...... 40,394 Common stock issued to stock discount plan -- 56,617 shares....................shares....... 1 940 -- -- -- 941 Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options -- 79,479 shares.................shares...... 1 1,211 -- -- -- 1,212 Tax benefit recognized upon exercise of stock options............................options..................... -- 258 -- -- -- 258 Treasury stock purchased -- 1,185,000 shares...................................shares............................... -- -- -- -- (30,409) (30,409) Treasury stock issued to profit sharing plan -- 106,382 shares...................shares...... -- (177) -- -- 2,677 2,500 ---- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- BALANCE -- February 2, 2002..................2002.............. 424 191,888 355,128 (3,198) (34,359) 509,883 Comprehensive income: Net earnings.............................earnings......................... -- -- 42,412 -- -- 42,412 Translation adjustment...................adjustment............... -- -- -- 2,442 -- 2,442 Change in derivative fair value..........value...... -- -- -- 822 -- 822 ------------------ Total comprehensive income.............income...... 45,676 Common stock issued to stock discount plan -- 51,359 shares....................shares....... 1 761 -- -- -- 762 Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options -- 165,105 shares................shares...... 1 2,272 -- -- -- 2,273 Tax benefit recognized upon exercise of stock options............................options..................... -- 624 -- -- -- 624 Proceeds from sale of options contracts....put option contracts............................ -- 601 -- -- -- 601 Treasury stock purchased -- 1,480,000 shares...................................shares............................... -- -- -- -- (28,058) (28,058) ---- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- BALANCE -- February 1, 2003.................. $426 $196,146 $397,5402003.............. $ 426 $ 196,146 $ 397,540 $ 66 $(62,417) $531,761 ==== ======== ======== ======= ======== ========$ (62,417) $ 531,761 Comprehensive income: Net earnings........................ -- -- 50,026 -- -- 50,026 Translation adjustment.............. -- -- -- 9,908 -- 9,908 Change in derivative fair value..... -- -- -- 559 -- 559 ---------- Total comprehensive income 60,493 Common stock issued to stock discount plan -- 48,195 shares...... 1 742 -- -- -- 743 Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options -- 421,441 shares..... 4 7,573 -- -- -- 7,577 Tax benefit recognized upon exercise of stock options.................... -- 1,572 -- -- -- 1,572 Treasury stock issued to profit sharing plan - 41,841 shares........ -- (397) -- -- 897 500 Treasury stock purchased -- 4,175,900 shares.............................. -- -- -- -- (109,186) (109,186) ------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- BALANCE -- January 31, 2004............. $ 431 $ 205,636 $ 447,566 $ 10,533 $(170,706) $ 493,460 ====== ========= ========= ========= ========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2528 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 3, 2001, FEBRUARY 2, 2002, AND FEBRUARY 1, 2003 AND JANUARY 31, 2004 (IN THOUSANDS)
FISCAL YEAR ------------------------------ 2000----------------------------------- 2001 2002 -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS)2003 --------- --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net earnings.............................................. $ 84,661earnings ...................................................... $ 43,276 $ 42,412 $ 50,026 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization.......................... 34,689amortization .................................. 41,949 44,284 48,130 Gain on sale of assets ......................................... -- -- (4,381) Deferred tax provision................................. 6,028provision ......................................... 3,354 7,485 505 (Increase) decrease in inventories..................... (36,632)inventories ................................ (22,773) 17,338 (21,624) Increase in other assets............................... (8,341)assets .......................................... (8,995) (13,594) (3,246) Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses...... 1,534expenses ................. 719 19,503 35,491 Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable............ 12,262payable ....................... (6,949) (4,933) 14,086 Increase (decrease) in other liabilities.......................... 500liabilities .......................... 1,721 531 -------- -------- --------(220) --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by operating activities............ 94,701activities ................. 52,302 113,026 -------- -------- --------118,767 --------- --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Capital expenditures...................................... (79,411)expenditures .............................................. (64,777) (45,422) (48,700) Net proceeds from sale of assets..........................assets .................................. -- 6,812 -- Net assets acquired ............................................... -- -- 6,812(4,500) Investment in trademarks, tradenames and other assets..... (3,989)assets ............. (1,590) (2,619) -------- -------- --------(1,644) --------- --------- --------- Net cash used in investing activities................ (83,400)activities ..................... (66,367) (41,229) -------- -------- --------(54,844) --------- --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from issuance of common stock.................... 4,897stock ............................ 2,153 3,035 Long-term borrowings......................................8,320 Proceeds from issuance of debt .................................... -- -- 130,000 Bank borrowings ................................................... -- 39,624 Repayment of long-term debt............................... (2,518)-- Principal payments on bank debt ................................... (2,407) (40,743) (44,931) Deferred financing costs..................................costs .......................................... -- -- (1,075) (3,916) Proceeds from sale of put option contracts.................... 929contracts ........................ -- 601 Tax payments related to options exercised................. (109) -- -- Purchase of treasury stock................................ (7,871)stock ........................................ (30,409) (28,058) -------- -------- --------(109,186) --------- --------- --------- Net cash used in financing activities................ (4,672)activities ..................... (30,663) (26,616) -------- -------- --------(19,713) --------- --------- --------- Effect of exchange rate changes on cash..................... (1)cash ............................. (1,054) 1,099 -------- -------- --------3,012 --------- --------- --------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH................................. 6,628CASH ......................................... (45,782) 46,280 CASH: Beginning47,222 Cash beginning of period....................................... 77,798period .......................................... 84,426 38,644 -------- -------- -------- End84,924 --------- --------- --------- Cash end of period............................................. $ 84,426period ................................................ $ 38,644 $ 84,924 ======== ======== ========$ 132,146 ========= ========= ========= SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash paid during the year for: Interest............................................... $ 3,353Interest ........................................................ $ 3,468 $ 1,945 ======== ======== ========$ 2,091 ========= ========= ========= Income taxes........................................... $ 38,341taxes .................................................... $ 32,539 $ 25,582 ======== ======== ========$ 15,863 ========= ========= ========= SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Additional capital in excess of par resulting from tax benefit recognized upon exercise of stock options...... $ 1,382options ...................... $ 258 $ 624 ======== ======== ========$ 1,572 ========= ========= ========= Treasury stock contributed to employee stock plan......... $ 2,500plan ................. $ 2,500 $ -- ======== ======== ========$ 500 ========= ========= ========= Note payable issued as partial consideration for assets acquired .. $ -- $ -- $ 1,000 ========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2629 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 3, 2001, FEBRUARY 2, 2002 AND FEBRUARY 1, 2003 AND JANUARY 31, 2004 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Organization and Business -- The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") is a specialty retailer of menswear. We operate throughout the United States primarily under the brand names of Men's Wearhouse and K&G and under the brand name of Moores in Canada. We follow the standard fiscal year of the retail industry, which is a 52-week or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal year 2000 ended on February 3, 2001, fiscal year 2001 ended on February 2, 2002, and fiscal year 2002 ended on February 1, 2003.2003 and fiscal year 2003 ended on January 31, 2004. Fiscal year 2000 included 53 weeks. Both fiscal years 2001, 2002 and 20022003 included 52 weeks. Principles of Consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. and its wholly owned or controlled subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Use of Estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principals generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates and assumptions are those relating to inventories and long-lived assets, including goodwill, and our estimated liabilities for self-insured portions of our workers' compensation and employee health benefit liabilities and valuations of long-lived assets.costs. Cash -- Cash includes all cash in banks, cash on hand and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. As substantially all of our cash is held by five financial institutions, we are exposed to risk of loss in the event of failure of any of these parties. However, due to the creditworthiness of these five financial institutions, we anticipate full performance and access to our deposits and liquid investments. Accounts Receivable -- Accounts receivable consists of our third-party credit card receivables and other receivables, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $0.4 million at fiscal year end 2002 and 2003. Collectibility is reviewed regularly and the allowance is adjusted as necessary. Inventories -- Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on the first-in, first-outaverage cost method and the retail cost method. Inventory cost includes procurement and distribution costs (warehousing, freight, hangers and merchandising costs) associated with ending inventory. Property and Equipment -- Property and equipment are stated at cost. Normal repairs and maintenance costs are charged to earnings as incurred and additions and major improvements are capitalized. The cost of assets retired or otherwise disposed of and the related allowances for depreciation are eliminated from the accounts in the year of disposal and the resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to earnings. Buildings are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of 20 to 25 years. Depreciation of leasehold improvements is computed on the straight-line method over the term of the lease or useful life of the assets, whichever is shorter. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using primarily the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of three to ten years. Goodwill and Other Assets -- We adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142 "Goodwill and Other assets consist primarily of tuxedo rental assets, goodwill and trademarks, tradenames and other intangibles acquired. We initially recordIntangible Assets" ("SFAS No. 142") on February 3, 2002. Accordingly, intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair values. Identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized to expense over the estimated useful life of the asset. Trademarks, tradenames and other intangibles are amortized over estimated useful lives of 43 to 17 years using the straight-line method. Identifiable intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, such asincluding goodwill, are not amortized but are testedevaluated, at least annually, for impairment on an annual basis (see "Accounting Change" herein andby comparison of their carrying amounts with the fair value of the individual assets. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 did not result in any impairment charge. The disclosures required by SFAS No. 142 are included in Note 8).7. 30 Impairment of Long-Lived Assets -- We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144 "Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets" ("SFAS No. 144") on February 3, 2002. We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and amortizable intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined, based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows, that an impairment has occurred, a loss is recognized currently for the impairment (see "Accounting Change" herein). 27 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)impairment. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Fair Value of Financial Instruments -- As of February 2, 20021, 2003 and February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, management estimates that the fair value of cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses and long-term debt are carried at amounts that reasonably approximate their fair value. See Note 3 for the fair values of our long-term debt. Revenue Recognition -- Revenue is recognized at the time of sale and delivery of merchandise, net of actual sales returns and a provision for estimated sales returns. Revenues from alteration services are recognized upon completion of the alteration services. Advertising -- Advertising costs are expensed as incurred or, in the case of media production costs, when the commercial first airs. Advertising expenses were $61.2 million, $60.1 million and $62.9 million in fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Shipping and Handling Costs -- All shipping and handling costs for product sold are recognized as cost of goods sold. New Store Costs -- Promotion and other costs associated with the opening of new stores are expensed as incurred. Store Closures and Relocations -- On November 3, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("SFAS No. 146"). This statement requires, among other things, that a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred rather than when a company commits to such an activity and also establishes fair value as the objective for initial measurement of the liability. As of the fourth quarter of 2002, when we close or relocate a store, the present value of estimated unrecoverable cost, which is substantially made up of the remaining net lease obligation, is charged to expense. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2002, these costs were expensed upon management's commitment to closing or relocating a store, which was generally before the actual liability was incurred (see "Accounting Change" herein). Advertising -- Advertising costs are expensed as incurredincurred. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or in the case of media production costs, when the commercial first airs. Advertising expenses were $69.7 million, $61.2 million and $60.1 million in fiscal 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively. Revenue Recognition -- Revenue is recognized at the time of sale and delivery, net of a provision for estimated sales returns.cash flows. Stock Based Compensation -- As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), we account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees."Employees" ("APB No. 25"). We have adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123 and continue to apply APB OpinionNo. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for the stock option plans and the employee stock purchase plan. In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure" ("SFAS No. 148"). This statement amends SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. This statement is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of the disclosure requirements of this statement, on February 1, 2003, did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 are included below. 31 Had we elected to apply the accounting standards of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, our net earnings and net earnings per share would have approximatedbeen approximately the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):
FISCAL YEAR --------------------------- 2000-------------------------------------- 2001 2002 ------- ------- -------2003 ---------- ---------- ---------- Net earnings, as reported............................... $84,661 $43,276 $42,412reported ................................ $ 43,276 $ 42,412 $ 50,026 Deduct: Additional compensation expense, net of tax..... (3,156)tax ..... (3,129) (2,977) ------- ------- -------(2,460) ---------- ---------- ---------- Pro forma net earnings.................................. $81,505 $40,147 $39,435 ======= ======= =======earnings ................................... $ 40,147 $ 39,435 $ 47,566 ========== ========== ========== Net earnings per share: As reported: Basic................................................. $ 2.03Basic .................................................. $ 1.06 $ 1.04 Diluted............................................... $ 2.001.29 Diluted ................................................ $ 1.04 $ 1.04 $ 1.27 Pro forma: Basic................................................. $ 1.95Basic .................................................. $ 0.98 $ 0.97 Diluted............................................... $ 1.921.23 Diluted ................................................ $ 0.97 $ 0.96 $ 1.21
For purposes of computing pro forma net earnings, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which resulted in a weighted-average fair value of $13.82, $11.47, $11.70 and $11.70$9.99 for grants made during fiscal 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively. The following weighted average assumptions were used for option grants in 2000,fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively: expected volatility of 54.71%54.01%, 54.01%54.14% and 54.14%54.75%, risk-free interest rates (U.S. Treasury five year notes) of 6.67%4.57%, 4.57%4.29% and 4.29%3.14%, and an expected life of six years. The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure may not be indicative of pro forma future amounts. See Note 76 for additional disclosures regarding stock-based compensation. 28 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Derivative Financial Instruments -- We enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge against foreign exchange risks associated with certain firmly committed, and certain other probable, but not firmly committed, inventory purchase transactions that are denominated in a foreign currency (primarily the Euro). Gains and losses associated with these contracts are accounted for as part of the underlying inventory purchase transactions (seetransactions. These contacts have been accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 "Accounting Change" herein)for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133"), as amended, which we adopted on February 4, 2001. In accordance with the transition provisions of SFAS No. 133, we recorded a cumulative loss adjustment of $0.5 million ($0.3 million, net of tax) in accumulated other comprehensive loss related primarily to the unrealized losses on foreign currency exchange contracts, which were designated as cash-flow hedging instruments. The disclosures required by SFAS No. 133 are included in Note 8. In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("SFAS No. 149"). SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. Our adoption of this statement as of June 30, 2003 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In connection with our share repurchase programs, (Note 7),as described in Note 6, we from time to time issueissued put option contracts and receivereceived premiums for doing so, with the premiums being added to our capital in excess of par. Under these contracts, the contract counterparties havehad the option to require us to purchase a specific number of shares of our common stock at specific strike prices per share on specific dates. See Note 6 for additional disclosures regarding our put option contracts. Foreign Currency Translation -- Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at each balance sheet date. Shareholders' equity is translated at applicable historical exchange rates. Income, expense and cash flow items are translated at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity. 32 Comprehensive Income -- Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during the period presented that result from transactions and other economic events other than transactions with shareholders. Segment Information -- We consider our business as one operating segment based on the similar economic characteristics of our three brands. Revenues of Canadian retail operations were $145.7 million, $144.6 million, $141.9 million and $141.9$154.7 million for fiscal 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively. Long-lived assets of our Canadian operations were $32.8$35.2 million and $35.2$45.5 million as of the end of fiscal 20012002 and 2002,2003, respectively. Accounting Changefor Guarantees -- We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"), as amended, on February 4, 2001. In accordance with the transition provisions of SFAS 133, we recorded a cumulative loss adjustment of $0.5 million ($0.3 million, net of tax) in accumulated other comprehensive loss related primarily to the unrealized losses on foreign currency exchange contracts, which were designated as cash-flow hedging instruments. The disclosures required by SFAS No. 133 are included in Note 9. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141"), on July 1, 2001, and No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"), on February 3, 2002. SFAS 141 requires all business combinations completed after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method and eliminates the pooling of interests method. SFAS 142 eliminated the amortization of goodwill and also subjects goodwill to fair-value based impairment tests performed, at a minimum, on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances dictate. The adoption of SFAS 142 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations and we recorded no impairment charge. The disclosures required by SFAS 142 are included in Note 8. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets" ("SFAS 144"), on February 3, 2002. SFAS 144 provides a single accounting model for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("SFAS 146"), on November 3, 2002. SFAS 146 replaces EITF No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS 146 requires, among other things, that a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred rather than when a company commits to such an activity and also establishes fair value as the objective for initial 29 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) measurement of the liability. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -- Transition and Disclosure" ("SFAS 148"), on February 1, 2003. SFAS 148 amends FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Additionally, SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The adoption of the disclosure requirements of SFAS 148 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. The disclosures required by SFAS 148 are included as part of this note under the caption "Stock Based Compensation." In November 2002, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN No. 45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." FIN No. 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must disclose and recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement requirement of FIN No. 45 is effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. As of February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, we did not have any material guarantees that were issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN No. 45 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002 and are applicable to guarantees issued before December 31, 2002. We did not have any significant guarantees issued before December 31, 2002. Vendor Allowances -- In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issued Issue 02-16, "Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor." This EITF addresses the accounting treatment for cash vendor allowances received. The adoption of EITF Issue 02-16 in 2003 did not have ana material impact on the Company's financial position, or results of operations as we do not receive any material vendor allowances. New Accounting Pronouncementsor cash flows. Reporting Gains and Losses from the Early Extinguishment of Debt -- In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ("SFAS 143"). SFAS 143 addresses the accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs and is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. In April 2002, the FASB issuedWe adopted Statement No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections" ("SFAS No. 145"). on February 2, 2003. SFAS No. 145 rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," FASB Statement No. 44, "Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers" and FASB Statement No. 64, "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements". In addition, SFAS No. 145 amends FASB Statement No. 13, "Accounting for Leases," to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This statement also makes non-substantive technical corrections to existing pronouncements. SFAS 145 is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The adoption of this statement isdid not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, or results of operations. 30 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSoperations or cash flows. Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations -- (CONTINUED) In January 2003, theWe adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards BoardNo. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ("SFAS No. 143"), on February 2, 2003. SFAS No. 143 addresses the accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity -- We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity" ("SFAS No. 150") as of August 3, 2003. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments, many of which were previously classified as equity. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements -- In December 2003, the FASB issued Financiala revised interpretation of FASB Interpretation No. 46, ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (revised December 2003)" ("FIN 4646R"). FIN 46R requires that if an entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and results of activities of the variable interest entity should be included in the consolidated financial statements of the entity. FIN 46 requires that its provisions are46R is effective immediately for all arrangements entered intonew variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. WeFor variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46R must be applied no later than December 31, 2003 for entities meeting the definition of special - purpose entities, and no later than fiscal periods ending after March 15, 2004 for all other entities under construction. As we do not have any variable interest entities, created after January 31, 2003. For any arrangements entered into prior to January 31, 2003, the FIN 46 provisions are required to be adopted at the beginning of the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of FIN 4646R is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, or results of operations.operations or cash flows. 33 2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND ACQUISITIONS On February 10, 1999, we combined with Moores, a privately owned Canadian corporation, in exchange for securities ("Exchangeable Shares") exchangeable for 2.5 million shares of our common stock. The Exchangeable Shares were issued to the shareholders and option holders of Moores in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of capital stock and options of Moores because of Canadian tax law considerations. As of February 3, 2001, all Exchangeable Shares, which had substantially identical economic and legal rights as shares of our common stock, had been converted on a one-on-one basis to our common stock. As of January 29, 2000, there were 1.0 million Exchangeable Shares that had not yet been converted but were reflected as common stock outstanding for financial reporting purposes by the Company. The combination with Moores has been accounted for as a pooling of interests. On June 1, 1999, we combined with K&G, a superstore retailer of men's apparel and accessories operating 34 stores in 16 states. We issued approximately 4.4 million shares of our common stock to K&G shareholders based on an exchange ratio of 0.43 of a share of our common stock for each share of K&G common stock outstanding. In addition, we converted the outstanding options to purchase K&G common stock, whether vested or unvested, into options to purchase 228,000 shares of our common stock based on the exchange ratio of 0.43. The combination has been accounted for as a pooling of interests. 3. EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and net earnings. Diluted EPS gives effect to the potential dilution which would have occurred if additional shares were issued for stock options exercised under the treasury stock method. Diluted EPS also gives effect tomethod, as well as the potential dilution of any put optionthat could occur if our contingent convertible debt or other contracts (Note 7) outstanding, computed usingto issue common stock were converted or exercised. No dilution from the reverse treasury stock method.contingent convertible debt or other contracts has occurred. The following table reconciles the earnings and shares used in the basic and diluted EPS computations (in thousands, except per share amounts):
FISCAL YEAR --------------------------- 2000 2001 2002 2003 ------- ------- ------- Net earnings............................................ $84,661earnings ........................ $43,276 $42,412 $50,026 ======= ======= ======= Weighted average number of common shares outstanding.... 41,769outstanding ........ 40,997 40,590 38,789 ======= ======= ======= Basic earnings per share................................ $ 2.03share ............ $ 1.06 $ 1.04 $ 1.29 ======= ======= ======= Weighted average number of common shares outstanding.... 41,769outstanding ........ 40,997 40,590 38,789 Assumed exercise of stock options....................... 632options ... 449 287 506 ------- ------- ------- As adjusted............................................. 42,401adjusted ......................... 41,446 40,877 39,295 ======= ======= ======= Diluted earnings per share.............................. $ 2.00share .......... $ 1.04 $ 1.04 $ 1.27 ======= ======= =======
31 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 4.3. LONG-TERM DEBT In January 2003, we replaced our existing $125.0 million revolving credit facility which was scheduled to mature in February 2004 with a new revolving credit agreement with a group of banks (the "Credit Agreement") that provides for borrowing of up to $100.0 million through February 4, 2006.2006 (with extensions for up to two years under certain conditions). The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the stock of the subsidiaries of The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. Advances under the new Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, the agent's prime rate or the reserve adjusted LIBOR rate plus a varying interest rate margin.margin up to 2.25%. The Credit Agreement also provides for fees applicable to unused commitments.commitments ranging from 0.275% to 0.500%. The terms and conditions of the new Credit Agreement are substantially the same as those of the replaced facility. In addition, in January 2003, we entered into a new Canadian term credit agreement under which we borrowed Can $62.0 million (US $40.7 million) which was used to repay approximately Can $60.9 million (US $40.0 million) in outstanding indebtedness of Moores under the previous term credit agreement. On October 31, 2003, we repaid the outstanding indebtedness of Can $60.5 million (US $45.9 million). As of February 2, 2002 and February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, there waswere no indebtednessborrowings outstanding under the respective credit facilities.Credit Agreement. The new Credit Agreement contains variouscertain restrictive and financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain a minimum level of net worth and certain financial ratios. The Credit Agreement also prohibits payment of cash dividends on our common stock. We are in compliance with the covenants in the Credit Agreement. In addition, inAgreement as of January 31, 2004. On October 21, 2003, we entered intoissued $130.0 million of 3.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 ("Notes") in a new Canadian credit facility which is a term credit agreement under which we borrowed Can$62.0 million (US$40.7 million). The term credit borrowing is payable in quarterly installmentsprivate placement. A portion of Can$0.8 million (US$0.5 million) beginning May 2003, with the remaining unpaid principal payable on February 4, 2008. Borrowings undernet proceeds from the new term credit agreement wereNotes was used to repay approximately Can$60.9 million (US$40.0 million) inthe outstanding indebtedness of Moores under the previousour Canadian term credit agreement and to fund financing requirementsrepurchase shares of Moores.our common stock under the program authorized by the Board in September 2003; the balance is reserved for general corporate purposes, which may include additional purchases of our common stock under our share repurchase program. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on April 15, 2004. The effectiveNotes will mature on October 15, 2023. However, holders may require us to purchase all or part of the Notes, for cash, at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount per Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on October 15, 2008, October 15, 2013 and October 15, 2018 or upon a designated event. Beginning on October 15, 2008, we will pay additional contingent interest on the Notes if the average trading price of the Notes is above a specified level during a specified period. In addition, we may redeem all or a portion of the Notes on or after October 20, 2008, at 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest, contingent interest and additional 34 amounts, if any. We also have the right to redeem the Notes between October 20, 2006 and October 19, 2008 if the price of our common stock reaches certain levels. During certain periods, the Notes are convertible by holders into shares of our common stock initially at a conversion rate of 23.3187 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $42.88 per share of common stock (subject to adjustment in certain events), under the following circumstances: (1) if the closing sale price of our common stock issuable upon conversion exceeds 120% of the conversion price under specified conditions; (2) if we call the Notes for redemption; or (3) upon the term credit borrowing was 2.8%occurrence of specified corporate transactions. Upon conversion of the Notes, in lieu of delivering common stock we may, at our election, deliver cash or a combination of cash and 4.3% at February 2, 2002common stock. The Notes are general senior unsecured obligations, ranking on a parity in right of payment with all our existing and February 1,future unsecured senior indebtedness and our other general unsecured obligations, and senior in right of payment with all our future subordinated indebtedness. The Notes are effectively subordinated to all of our senior secured indebtedness, and all indebtedness and liabilities of our subsidiaries. In December 2003, respectively. Covenantswe acquired the assets and operating leases for 13 retail dry cleaning and laundry facilities and issued a $1.0 million note payable as partial consideration. The unsecured note payable is due in full in 2008 and interest rates for the term credit agreement are substantially similar to those contained in our new Credit Agreement. As of February 2, 2002 and February 1, 2003, there was US$40.1 million and US$40.7 million outstanding under these credit agreements, respectively. Maturities of our long-term debt are as follows: 2003 -- $2.0 million; 2004 -- $2.0 million; 2005 -- $2.0 million; 2006 -- $2.0 million; 2007 -- $2.0 million; 2008 -- $30.7 million.compounds annually at 4.0%. We utilize letters of credit primarily for inventory purchases. At February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, letters of credit totaling approximately $10.4$17.3 million were issued and outstanding. 5.The fair value of the Notes, using quoted market prices of the same or similar issues, was approximately $127.1 million at January 31, 2004. The carrying amounts of all other long-term debt approximate fair value at February 1, 2003 and January 31, 2004. 4. INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
FISCAL YEAR --------------------------- 2000------------------------------ 2001 2002 ------- ------- -------2003 -------- -------- -------- Current tax expense: Federal............................................... $37,092 $14,607 $10,248 State................................................. 4,896Federal ........................... $ 14,607 $ 10,248 $ 17,889 State ............................. 1,715 1,010 Foreign............................................... 7,6421,081 Foreign ........................... 8,022 6,976 10,236 Deferred tax expense (benefit): Federal and state..................................... 6,080state ................. 3,088 5,695 Foreign............................................... (52)3,107 Foreign ........................... 266 1,790 ------- ------- ------- Total......................................... $55,658 $27,698 $25,719 ======= ======= =======(2,602) -------- -------- -------- Total ..................... $ 27,698 $ 25,719 $ 29,711 ======== ======== ========
32 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) No provision for U.S. income taxes or Canadian withholding taxes has been made on the cumulative undistributed earnings of Moores (approximately $66.9$96.2 million at February 1, 2003)January 31, 2004) since such earnings are considered to be permanently invested in Canada. The determination of any unrecognized deferred tax liability for the cumulative undistributed earnings of Moores is not considered practicable since such liability, if any, will depend on a number of factors that cannot be known until such time as a decision to repatriate the earnings might be made by management. A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to our effective tax rate is as follows:
FISCAL YEAR ------------------ 2000---------------- 2001 2002 2003 ---- ---- ---- Federal statutory rate......................................rate ...................... 35% 35% 35% State income taxes, net of federal benefit.................. 3benefit .. 2 1 Other.......................................................2 Other ....................................... 2 2 2 -- -- -- 40%- --- --- --- 39% 38% == == ==37% === === ===
At February 2, 2002, we had net deferred tax liabilities of $3.7 million with $8.4 million classified as other current assets and $12.1 million classified as other liabilities (noncurrent). At February 1, 2003, we had net deferred tax liabilities of $8.1 million with $12.7 million classified as other current assets and $20.8 million classified as other liabilities (noncurrent). TheAt January 31, 2004, we had net deferred tax liabilities of $8.5 million with $14.4 million classified as other current assets and $22.9 million classified as other liabilities (noncurrent). Our state net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards expire in varying amounts annually from 2005 through 20202023 and from 2004 through 2007,2008, respectively. A valuation 35 allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amount of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized. As of February 2, 20021, 2003 and February 1, 2003,January 31, 2004, no valuation allowance was considered necessary. Total deferred tax assets and liabilities and the related temporary differences as of February 2, 20021, 2003 and February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 were as follows (in thousands):
FEBRUARY 2, FEBRUARY 1, 2002JANUARY 31, 2003 ----------- -----------2004 -------- -------- Deferred tax assets: Accrued rent and other expenses........................... $ 5,368expenses .............. $ 6,854 $ 8,857 Accrued compensation...................................... 1,795compensation ......................... 1,932 2,016 Accrued inventory markdowns............................... 1,709markdowns .................. 985 595 Deferred intercompany profits............................. 2,526profits ................ 2,742 3,399 Unused state operating loss carryforwards................. --carryforwards .... 3,130 1,609 Unused foreign tax credits................................ 451credits ................... 662 Other..................................................... 449873 Other ........................................ 518 620 -------- -------- 12,298 16,823 17,969 -------- -------- Deferred tax liabilities: Capitalized inventory costs............................... (2,978)costs .................. (4,126) (3,483) Property and equipment.................................... (11,449)equipment ....................... (19,533) Intangibles............................................... (665)(20,520) Intangibles .................................. (1,225) Other..................................................... (945)(1,781) Deferred interest ............................ -- (674) -------- -------- (16,037) (24,884) (26,458) -------- -------- Net deferred tax liabilities................................liabilities ................... $ (3,739)(8,061) $ (8,061)(8,489) ======== ========
33 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6.5. OTHER ASSETS AND ACCRUED EXPENSES Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
FEBRUARY 2, FEBRUARY 1, 2002JANUARY 31, 2003 ----------- -----------2004 -------- -------- GoodwillTrademarks, tradenames and other intangibles..............................intangibles .............. $ 53,9217,958 $ 57,7279,475 Accumulated amortization.................................... (14,244) (14,933)amortization .................................. (1,771) (2,450) -------- -------- 39,677 42,7946,187 7,025 Tuxedo rental assets, deposits and other.................... 15,803other .................. 21,757 33,363 -------- -------- Total..................................................Total ........................................... $ 55,48027,944 $ 64,55140,388 ======== ========
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands): Sales, payroll and property taxes payable...................payable ................. $ 6,7958,874 $ 8,87410,725 Accrued salary, bonus and vacation.......................... 16,132vacation ........................ 17,779 24,041 Accrued workers compensation and medical costs.............. 4,167costs ............ 5,419 8,919 Unredeemed gift certificates................................ 8,072 9,992gif certificates ............................... 10,624 13,096 Deferred gain on sale of assets.............................assets ........................... 4,423 -- 4,423 Other....................................................... 8,867 8,836Other ..................................................... 8,204 14,351 -------- -------- Total..................................................Total ........................................... $ 44,03355,323 $ 55,32371,132 ======== ========
7.36 6. CAPITAL STOCK, STOCK OPTIONS AND BENEFIT PLANS In January 2000, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to one million shares of our common stock in the open market or in private transactions. On January 31, 2001, the Board authorized an expansion of the program for up to an additional two million shares. During 2000, 2001 and 2002, we repurchased 335,000, 1,185,000 and 1,480,000 shares at a cost of $7.9 million, $30.4 million and $28.1 million, respectively, to complete the program. On November 19, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program for up to $25.0 million in shares of our common stock. Under this authorization,the first three authorized programs, we may purchaserepurchased 1,185,000, 1,480,000 and 1,057,100 shares from timeof our common stock during fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively, at a cost of $30.4 million, $28.1 million and $24.1 million, respectively. The average price per share of our common stock repurchased under these programs was $25.66, $18.96 and $22.80 during fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. In September 2003, the Board of Directors authorized a program for the repurchase of up to time$100.0 million of our common stock in the open market or in private transactions, depending on market price and other considerations.transactions. This authorization superceded the approximately $1 million we had remaining under the Board's November 2002 authorization. As of February 24, 2003, no sharesJanuary 31, 2004, we had been repurchased under this program.program 1,405,400 shares at a cost of $42.4 million in private transactions and 1,713,400 shares at a cost of $42.6 million in open market transactions. Under all programs during fiscal 2003, we repurchased 4,175,900 shares of our common stock at a cost of $109.2 million, with an average repurchase price of $26.15 per share. In connection with our share repurchase programs, we have from time to time issued put option contracts and received premiums for doing so, with the premiums being added to our capital in excess of par and effectively reducing the cost of our share repurchases. During 2000, we issued three separateUnder these contracts, forthe contract counterparties had the option to require us to purchase a totalspecific number of 650,000 shares and received premiums of $0.9 million. However, the contracts expired unexercised and all of the 335,000 shares we repurchased for $7.9 million in 2000 were acquired in open market transactions. During 2002, we repurchased 980,000 shares of our common stock at a specific strike price per share on a specific date. During fiscal 2002, we issued a put contract for $16.7 million in the open market and 500,000 shares for $11.4 million through settlement of an option contract. Weand received a premium of $0.6 million for issuing this contract. The contract counterparty had the option to exercise this contract at a strike price of $22.76 per share on December 17, 2002, but contract completion was required earlier if the market price of our common stock fell below a trigger price of $12.64 per share. During the third quarter of 2002, the market price of our common stock fell below the trigger price and we settled the contract.contract by repurchasing the 500,000 shares at $22.76 per share or $11.4 million; we recorded the shares purchased as treasury stock. We were not obligated to issue any shares under the put contract nor were we obligated to settle in cash. We have adopted the 1992 Stock Option Plan ("1992 Plan") which, as amended, provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 1,071,507 shares of our common stock to full-time key employees (excluding certain officers), the 1996 Stock Option Plan ("1996 Plan") which, as amended, provides for the grant of 34 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) options to purchase up to 1,850,000 shares of our common stock to full-time key employees (excluding certain officers), and the 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan ("1998 Plan") which, as amended, provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 2,100,000 shares of our common stock to full-time key employees (excluding certain officers). The 1992 Plan expired in February 2002 and each of the other plans will expire at the end of ten years; no option may be granted pursuant to the plans after the expiration date. In fiscal 1992, we also adopted a Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan ("Director Plan") which, as amended, provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 167,500 shares of our common stock to non-employee directors of the Company. In fiscal 2001, the Director Plan's termination date was extended to February 23, 2012. Options granted under these plans must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant. Generally, options granted under the 1992 Plan, 1996 Plan and 1998 Plan vest at the rate of 1/3 of the shares covered by the grant on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant and may not be issued at a price less than 50% of the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant. However, a significant portion of options granted under these Plans vest annually in varying increments over a period from one to ten years. Options granted under the Director Plan vest one year after the date of grant and are issued at a price equal to the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant. On January 30, 2004, 4,000 restricted shares were granted to the outside directors at a grant price of $23.29 per share. The grant of these restricted shares is contingent upon shareholder approval of the amendment and restatement of the Director Plan. The following table is a summary of our stock option activity: 37
WEIGHTED SHARES UNDER WEIGHTED AVERAGE OPTIONS OPTION EXERCISE PRICE EXERCISABLE ------------ ------------------------- -------------- ----------- Options outstanding, January 29, 2000......... 2,052,960 $19.18 1,063,649 ========= Granted..................................... 741,745 $23.72 Exercised................................... (248,653) $15.59 Forfeited................................... (111,691) $22.74 --------- Options outstanding, February 3, 2001.........2001...................... 2,434,361 $20.76$ 20.76 1,262,993 ========= Granted.....................................Granted.................................................. 498,490 $20.45 Exercised...................................$ 20.45 Exercised................................................ (79,479) $15.24 Forfeited...................................$ 15.24 Forfeited................................................ (60,165) $23.54$ 23.54 --------- Options outstanding, February 2, 2002.........2002...................... 2,793,207 $20.80$ 20.80 1,594,171 ========= Granted.....................................Granted.................................................. 500,800 $20.42 Exercised...................................$ 20.42 Exercised................................................ (165,105) $13.77 Forfeited...................................$ 13.77 Forfeited................................................ (125,115) $21.66$ 21.66 --------- Options outstanding, February 1, 2003.........2003...................... 3,003,787 $21.09$ 21.09 1,797,834 ========= Granted.................................................. 608,125 $ 17.23 Exercised................................................ (421,441) $ 17.98 Forfeited................................................ (75,533) $ 20.73 --------- Options outstanding, January 31, 2004...................... 3,114,938 $ 20.76 1,444,494 ========= =========
35 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Grants of stock options outstanding as of February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 are summarized as follows:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING ------------------------------------- OPTIONS EXERCISABLE ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- WEIGHTED- ----------------------- AVERAGE WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- REMAINING AVERAGE AVERAGE RANGE OF NUMBER CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE NUMBER EXERCISE EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING LIFE PRICE EXERCISABLE PRICE - --------------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------------- $9.33$ 9.89 to 18.00................. 840,451 4.4 Years $14.93 629,326 $14.45 18.01 to 21.50................. 1,093,831 7.4 Years 21.18 397,625 21.25 21.51 to 24.00................. 708,063 6.8 Years 23.58 456,469 23.56 24.01 to 50.00................. 361,44218.00.............. 945,860 5.8 Years 30.23 314,414 30.73$ 14.56 471,985 $15.25 18.00 to 21.50.............. 966,522 6.6 Years 21.19 318,308 21.31 21.50 to 24.00.............. 830,040 7.1 Years 23.19 349,262 23.55 24.00 to 50.00.............. 372,516 5.3 Years 29.96 304,939 30.96 --------- --------- $9.33$ 9.89 to 50.00................. 3,003,787 $21.09 1,797,834 $21.1150.00.............. 3,114,938 $ 20.76 1,444,494 $21.91 ========= =========
As of February 1, 2003, 1,247,147January 31, 2004, 741,113 options were available for grant under existing plans and 3,878,2963,860,051 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under these plans.issuance. The difference between the option price and the fair market value of our common stock on the dates that options for 248,653, 79,479, 165,105 and 165,105421,441 shares of common stock were exercised during 2000,fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively, resulted in a tax benefit to us of $1.4 million in 2000, $0.3 million, in 2001 and $0.6 million in 2002,and $1.6 million, respectively, which has been recognized as capital in excess of par. In addition, we withheld 3,890 shares during 2000 of such common stock for withholding payments made to satisfy the optionees' income tax liabilities resulting from the exercises. We have a profit sharing plan, in the form of an employee stock plan, which covers all eligible employees, and an employee tax-deferred savings plan. Contributions to the profit sharing plan are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. During 2000,fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, contributions charged to operations were $2.9 million, $0.4 million, $0.8 million and $0.8$1.7 million, respectively, for the plans. 38 In 1998, we adopted an Employee Stock Discount Plan ("ESDP") which allows employees to authorize after-tax payroll deductions to be used for the purchase of up to 1,425,000 shares of our common stock at 85% of the lesser of the fair market value on the first day of the offering period or the fair market value on the last day of the offering period. We make no contributions to this plan but pay all brokerage, service and other costs incurred. Effective for offering periods beginning July 1, 2002, the plan was amended so that a participant may not purchase more than 125 shares during any calendar quarter. During 2000,fiscal 2001, 2002 and 20022003, employees purchased 44,713, 56,617, 51,359 and 51,35948,195 shares, respectively, under the ESDP, the weighted-average fair value of which was $22.82, $16.63, $14.82 and $14.82$15.41 per share, respectively. As of February 1, 2003, 1,203,242January 31, 2004, 1,155,047 shares were reserved for future issuance under the ESDP. 8.7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS We adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," on February 3, 2002, as noted in Note 1.2002. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we discontinued the amortization of goodwill effective February 3, 2002. Additionally, SFAS No. 142 also subjects goodwill to fair-value based impairment tests performed, at a minimum, on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances dictate. We completed the transitional impairment test of goodwill as of February 3, 2002 during the first quarter of 2002 and the annual impairment test of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2002.2003. No impairment charges were recorded. 36 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Had we applied SFAS No. 142 during 2000 andfiscal 2001, our net earnings and net earnings per share would have approximated the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
FOR THE YEAR ENDED --------------------------- 2000 2001 2002 ------- ------- ------- Net earnings, as reported............................... $84,661 $43,276 $42,412reported.......................... $ 43,276 Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of tax..................... 1,728tax............. 1,708 -- ------- ------- ---------------- Pro forma net earnings.................................. $86,389 $44,984 $42,412 ======= ======= =======earnings............................. $ 44,984 ========= Earnings per share: Basic: Net earnings, as reported..........................reported................. $ 2.031.06 Goodwill amortization, net of tax......... 0.04 --------- Pro forma net earnings.................... $ 1.061.10 ========= Diluted: Net earnings, as reported................. $ 1.04 Goodwill amortization, net of tax..................tax......... 0.04 0.04 -- ------- ------- ---------------- Pro forma net earnings............................. $ 2.07 $ 1.10 $ 1.04 ======= ======= ======= Diluted: Net earnings, as reported.......................... $ 2.00 $ 1.04 $ 1.04 Goodwill amortization, net of tax.................. 0.04 0.04 -- ------- ------- ------- Pro forma net earnings............................. $ 2.04earnings.................... $ 1.08 $ 1.04 ======= ======= ================
Goodwill and other intangibles are included in other assets in the accompanying balance sheet. Changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended February 2, 20021, 2003 and February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands): Balance, February 3, 2001................................................... $38,447 Goodwill of acquired business............................................. 1,069 Amortization of goodwill.................................................. (2,800) Translation adjustment.................................................... (1,155) ------- Balance, February 2, 2002...................................................2002.................................. $ 35,561 Goodwill of acquired business.............................................business.......................... 233 Translation adjustment....................................................adjustment................................. 813 ----------------- Balance, February 1, 2003................................................... $36,607 =======2003.................................. 36,607 Goodwill of acquired business.......................... 4,550 Translation adjustment................................. 2,710 ---------- Balance, January 31, 2004.................................. $ 43,867 ==========
39 The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of our other intangibles are as follows (in thousands):
FEBRUARY 2, FEBRUARY 1, 2002JANUARY 31, 2003 2004 ----------- ----------- Trademarks, tradenames and other intangibles................ $ 5,4657,958 $ 7,9589,475 Accumulated amortization.................................... (1,350) (1,771) ------- -------(2,450) ----------- ----------- Net total................................................. $ 4,115total.............................................. $ 6,187 ======= =======$ 7,025 =========== ===========
The pretax amortization expense associated with intangible assets totaled approximately $269,000, $346,000, $428,000 and $428,000$737,000 for fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2002,2003, respectively. Pretax amortization expense associated with intangible assets at February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 is estimated to be approximately $617,000$836,000 for each of the fiscal years 2003 through2004 and 2005, $579,000$785,000 for fiscal year 2006 and $457,000 for fiscal year 2007. 37 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES LEASE COMMITMENTS We lease retail business locations, office and warehouse facilities, computer equipment and automotive equipment under operating leases expiring in various years through 2018. Rent expense for fiscal 2000, 2001 and 2002 was $71.8 million, $78.3 million and $86.0 million, respectively, and includes contingent rentals of $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Minimum future rental payments under noncancelable operating leases as of February 1, 2003$623,000 for each of the next fivefiscal years 2007 and in the aggregate are as follows (in thousands):
FISCAL YEAR AMOUNT - ----------- -------- 2003........................................................ $ 84,923 2004........................................................ 78,074 2005........................................................ 68,775 2006........................................................ 56,418 2007........................................................ 46,601 Thereafter.................................................. 107,759 -------- Total.................................................. $442,550 ========
Leases on retail business locations specify minimum rentals plus common area maintenance charges and possible additional rentals based upon percentages of sales. Most of the retail business location leases provide for renewal options at rates specified in the leases. In the normal course of business, these leases are generally renewed or replaced by other leases. LEGAL MATTERS On May 11, 2001, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego, Cause No. GIC 767223 (the "San Diego County Suit"). The San Diego County Suit, which was brought as a purported class action, alleges several causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that we advertised and sold men's slacks at a marked price that was exclusive of a hemming fee for the pants. The San Diego County Suit seeks: (i) permanent and preliminary injunctions against advertising slacks at prices which do not include hemming; (ii) restitution of all funds allegedly acquired by means of any act or practice declared by the Court to be unlawful or fraudulent or to constitute unfair competition under certain California statutes, (iii) prejudgment interest; (iv) compensatory and punitive damages; (v) attorney's fees; and (vi) costs of suit. We believe that the San Diego County Suit is without merit and the allegations are contrary to customary and well recognized and accepted practices in the sale of men's tailored clothing. The complaint in the San Diego County Suit was subsequently amended to add similar causes of action and requests for relief based upon allegations that our alleged "claims that [it] sell[s] the same garments as department stores at 20% to 30% less" are false and misleading. We believe that such added causes of action are also without merit. The court ruled against the plaintiff's motion for class certification, declining to certify a class. On October 17, 2002, the court granted summary adjudication in favor of the Company on the plaintiff's false advertising claim on behalf of the general public relating to hemming fees, and also reaffirmed its earlier ruling denying class certification. The court found there were triable issues of fact, and therefore denied summary adjudication on the remaining claims. The court has tentatively set a trial date for May 19, 2003. The Company intends to vigorously defend the San Diego County Suit. On April 18, 2003, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California for the County of Orange, Case No. 03CC00132 (the "Orange County Suit"). On April 21, 2003, a lawsuit was filed against K&G Men's Center, Inc. and K&G Men's Company Inc. (collectively, "K&G"), wholly owned 38 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC.2008. 8. ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) subsidiaries of the Company, in the Los Angeles Superior Court of California, Case No. BC294361 (the "Los Angeles County Suit"; the Los Angeles County Suit and the Orange County Suit shall be referred to jointly as the "Suits"). The Suits, which were both brought as purported class actions, allege several causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that in the State of California the Company and K&G misclassified its managers and assistant managers as exempt from the application of certain California labor statutes. Because of this misclassification, the Suits allege that the Company and K&G failed to pay overtime compensation and provide the required rest periods to such employees. The Suits seek, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief along with an accounting as to alleged wages, premium pay, penalties, interest and restitution allegedly due the class defendants. We believe that our managers and assistant managers were properly classified as exempt under such statutes and, therefore, properly compensated. The Company believes that the Suits are without merit and intends to vigorously defend them. In addition, we are involved in various routine legal proceedings, including ongoing litigation, incidental to the conduct of our business. Management believes that none of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. CURRENCY CONTRACTSHEDGING In connection with our direct sourcing program, we may enter into purchase commitments that are denominated in a foreign currency (primarily the Euro). Our policy is to enterpractices include entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to minimize foreign currency exposure related to forecasted purchases of certain inventories. Under SFAS No. 133, such contracts have been designated as and accounted for as cash flow hedges. The settlement terms of the forward contracts, including amount, currency and maturity, correspond with payment terms for the merchandise inventories. Any ineffective portion of a hedge is reported in earnings immediately. At February 1, 2003, the CompanyJanuary 31, 2004, we had four23 contracts maturing in varying increments to purchase an aggregate notional amount of $1.4$15.4 million in foreign currency, maturing at various dates through March 2003.January 2005. During fiscal 2002 and 2003, we recognized an insignificant amount of hedge ineffectiveness. The changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts are matched to inventory purchases by period and are recognized in earnings as such inventory is sold. The fair value of the forward exchange contracts is estimated by comparing the cost of the foreign currency to be purchased under the contracts using the exchange rates obtained under the contracts (adjusted for forward points) to the hypothetical cost using the spot rate at year end.year-end. We expect to recognize in earnings through January 31, 200429, 2005 approximately $0.1$0.7 million, net of tax, of existing net gains presently deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income. 399. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Lease commitments We lease retail business locations, office and warehouse facilities, copier equipment and automotive equipment under operating leases expiring in various years through 2028. Rent expense for fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003 was $78.3 million, $86.0 million and $90.0 million, respectively, and includes contingent rentals of $0.3 million, $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Minimum future rental payments under noncancelable operating leases as of January 31, 2004 for each of the next five years and in the aggregate are as follows (in thousands): 40 THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
FISCAL YEAR AMOUNT - ------------------------------------- --------- 2004................................. $ 91,839 2005................................. 83,178 2006................................. 69,542 2007................................. 58,966 2008................................. 48,211 Thereafter........................... 102,655 --------- Total............................ $ 454,391 =========
Leases on retail business locations specify minimum rentals plus common area maintenance charges and possible additional rentals based upon percentages of sales. Most of the retail business location leases provide for renewal options at rates specified in the leases. In the normal course of business, these leases are generally renewed or replaced by other leases. Legal matters On April 18, 2003, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California for the County of Orange, Case No. 03CC00132 (the "Orange County Suit"). On April 21, 2003, a lawsuit was filed against K&G Men's Center, Inc. and K&G Men's Company Inc. (collectively, "K&G"), wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, in the Los Angeles Superior Court of California, Case No. BC294361 (the "Los Angeles County Suit"; the Los Angeles County Suit and the Orange County Suit shall be referred to jointly as the "Suits"). The Orange County Suit was brought as a purported class action. The Los Angeles County Suit was brought as a multi-party action. The Suits allege several causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that in the State of California the Company and K&G misclassified its managers and assistant managers as exempt from the application of certain California labor statutes. Because of this alleged misclassification, the Suits allege that the Company and K&G failed to pay overtime compensation and provide the required rest periods to such employees. The Suits seek, among other things, declaratory and injunctive relief along with an accounting as to alleged wages, premium pay, penalties, interest and restitution allegedly due the class defendants. On April 23, 2003, a lawsuit was filed against K&G in the Los Angeles Superior Court of California, Case No. BC294497 (the "Tailor's Suit"). The Tailor's Suit was brought as a multi-party action. The Tailor's Suit alleges several causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that in the State of California K&G misclassified the tailors working in their stores as "independent contractors" and refused to classify them as non-exempt employees subject to the application of certain California labor statutes. Because of this alleged misclassification, the Tailor's Suit alleges that K&G failed to pay hourly and overtime compensation and provide the required rest periods required by such labor statutes. The Tailor's Suit further alleges that K&G violated several other labor statutes and regulations as well as the California Unfair Competition Law. It seeks, among other things, restitution, disgorgement due to failure to comply with California labor laws, penalties, declaratory and injunctive relief. As a result of recent mediations, we recognized a charge in the fourth quarter of 2003 for $3.7 million ($2.3 million, net of tax) which we believe to be a reasonable estimate of the incremental costs we expect to incur in connection with the proposed resolution of the Suits and the Tailor's Suit. We believe that the Suits and the Tailor's Suit will be resolved in 2004; however, no assurance can be given that the anticipated resolution will be realized. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of the Suits or the Tailor's Suit will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. On April 1, 2004, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC313038 (the "PII Suit"). The PII Suit, which was brought as a purported class action, alleges two causes of action, each based on the factual allegation that the Company requests or requires, in conjunction with a customer's use of his or her credit card, the customer to provide personal identification information which is recorded upon the credit card transaction form. The PII Suit seeks: (i) civil penalties pursuant to the California Civil Code; (ii) an order enjoining the Company from requesting or requiring that a customer provide personal identification information which is then recorded on the transaction form; (iii) permanent and preliminary injunctions against the Company requesting or requiring that a customer provide personal identification information which is then recorded on the transaction form; (iv) restitution of all funds allegedly acquired by means of any act or practice declared by the Court to be unlawful or fraudulent or to constitute a violation of the California Business and Professions Code; (v) attorney's fees; and (vi) costs of suit. The court has not yet decided whether the action may proceed as a class action. The Company intends to vigorously defend the PII Suit. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of the PII Suit will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 41 In addition, we are involved in various routine legal proceedings, including ongoing litigation, incidental to the conduct of our business. Management believes that none of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. 10. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) Our quarterly results of operations reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The consolidated results of operations by quarter for the 20012002 and 20022003 fiscal years are presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
FISCAL 2001 QUARTERS ENDED ------------------------------------------------ MAY 5, AUGUST 4, NOVEMBER 3, FEBRUARY 2, 2001 2001 2001 2002 -------- --------- ----------- ----------- Net sales................................ $304,651 $297,153 $285,608 $385,742 Gross margin............................. 111,688 108,295 97,072 134,056 Net earnings............................. $ 12,742 $ 10,250 $ 3,977 $ 16,307 Net earnings per share: Basic.................................. $ 0.31 $ 0.25 $ 0.10 $ 0.40 Diluted................................ $ 0.31 $ 0.25 $ 0.10 $ 0.39
FISCAL 2002 QUARTERS ENDED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAY 4, AUGUST 3, NOVEMBER 2, FEBRUARY 1, 2002 2002 2002 2003 ------------------- --------- ----------- ----------- Net sales................................sales.............. $303,857 $308,574 $292,515 $390,103$ 308,574 $ 292,515 $ 390,103 Gross margin.............................margin .......... 104,155 107,051 97,940 145,202 Net earnings.............................earnings .......... $ 10,458 $ 7,797 $ 4,285 $ 19,872 Net earnings per share: Basic..................................Basic .............. $ 0.25 $ 0.19 $ 0.11 $ 0.50 Diluted................................Diluted ............ $ 0.25 $ 0.19 $ 0.11 $ 0.50
FISCAL 2003 QUARTERS ENDED ----------------------------------------------- MAY 3, AUGUST 2, NOVEMBER 1, JANUARY 31, 2003 2003 2003 2004 -------- --------- ----------- ----------- Net sales.............. $313,122 $ 334,292 $ 322,613 $ 422,653 Gross margin........... 111,219 122,936 118,438 161,350 Net earnings........... $ 11,012 $ 11,448 $ 9,055 $ 18,511 Net earnings per share: Basic............... $ 0.28 $ 0.29 $ 0.23 $ 0.50 Diluted ............ $ 0.28 $ 0.29 $ 0.23 $ 0.49
Due to the method of calculating weighted average common shares outstanding, the sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal earnings per share for the respective years. 4042 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY TheExcept as set forth below, the information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company'sour Proxy Statement for itsthe Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held July 1, 2003.June 30, 2004. The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Management which applies to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and all Presidents, Chief Financial Officers, Principal Accounting Officers, Executive Vice Presidents and other designated financial and operations officers. A copy of such policy is filed as an Exhibit hereto. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company'sour Proxy Statement for itsthe Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held July 1, 2003.June 30, 2004. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table sets forth certain equity compensation plan information for The Men's Wearhouse as of February 1, 2003.
NUMBER OF SECURITIES REMAINING AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDER EQUITY TO BE ISSUED WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMPENSATION PLANS UPON EXERCISE OF EXERCISE PRICE OF (EXCLUDING SECURITIES OUTSTANDING OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS IN COLUMN (A)) PLAN CATEGORY (A) (B) (C) - ------------- -------------------- ------------------- --------------------- Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders.............. 1,629,972 19.22 637,327 Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders(1)....................... 1,373,815 23.30 609,820 --------- ----- --------- Total.............................. 3,003,787 21.09 1,247,147 ========= =========
- --------------- (1) The Company has adopted the 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the "1998 Plan") which, as amended, provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 2,100,000 shares of the Company's common stock to full-time key employees (excluding executive officers), of which 1,296,591 shares are to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and 609,820 shares remain available for future issuance under the 1998 Plan. Options granted under the 1998 Plan must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. Unless otherwise provided by the Stock Option Committee, options granted under the 1998 Plan vest at the rate of 1/3 of the shares covered by the grant on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant and may not be issued at a price less than 50% of the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant. However, a significant portion of options granted under these Plans vest annually in varying increments over a period from one to ten years. In connection with the merger with K&G Men's Center, Inc. in June 1999, the Company granted substitute options to certain holders of options to purchase shares of common stock of K&G Men's Center, Inc. who were not eligible to participate in the Company's stock option plans at a weighted- average exercise price of $38.60. Of the 62,134 shares initially reserved for issuance pursuant to such options, options covering 24,724 shares remain unexercised at this time. In connection with other acquisitions, the Company entered into employment or consulting arrangements with certain key individuals at the acquired companies and issued to them options to purchase 30,000 shares at an exercise price of $17.42 and 22,500 shares at an exercise price of $24.25, all of which remain unexercised. 41 The additional information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company'sour Proxy Statement for itsthe Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held July 1, 2003.June 30, 2004. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company'sour Proxy Statement for itsthe Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held July 1, 2003.June 30, 2004. ITEM 14. DISCLOSURE CONTROLSPRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND PROCEDURES EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Within 90 days priorSERVICES The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to the filing of this report, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures was performed. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management of the Company on a timely basis in order to comply with the Company's disclosure obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the SEC rules thereunder. CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation.be held June 30, 2004. 43 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) 1. Financial StatementsFINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following consolidated financial statements of the Company are included in Part II, Item 8. Independent Auditors' Report Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 2, 20021, 2003 and February 1, 2003January 31, 2004 Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended February 3, 2001, February 2, 2002, and February 1, 2003 and January 31, 2004 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended February 3, 2001, February 2, 2002, and February 1, 2003 and January 31, 2004 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 3, 2001, February 2, 2002, and February 1, 2003 and January 31, 2004 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 2. Financial Statement SchedulesFINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. (IN THOUSANDS)
Balance at Charged to Charged to Deductions Balance at Beginning Costs and Other from Translation End of of Period Expenses Accounts (4) Reserve (2) Adjustment Period ---------- ---------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------- Allowance for uncollectible accounts (1): Year ended February 2, 2002 $ 284 $ 197 $ - $ (159) $ - $ 322 Year ended February 1, 2003 322 225 - (106) - 441 Year ended January 31, 2004 441 360 - (411) 3 393 Allowance for sales returns (1) (3): Year ended February 2, 2002 $ - $ (425) $ 750 $ - $ - $ 325 Year ended February 1, 2003 325 - - - - 325 Year ended January 31, 2004 325 (53) 92 - - 364 Inventory reserves (1): Year ended February 2, 2002 $ 7,654 $ 3,108 $ - $ - $ (202) $ 10,560 Year ended February 1, 2003 10,560 (3,551) - - 125 7,134 Year ended January 31, 2004 7,134 (588) - - 311 6,857
- ---------- (1) The allowance for uncollectible accounts, the allowance for sales returns and the inventory reserves are evaluated at the end of each fiscal quarter and adjusted based on the evaluation. (2) Consists primarily of write-offs of bad debt. (3) Allowance for sales returns is included in accrued expenses. (4) Deducted from net sales. 44 All suchother schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto. 3. ExhibitsEXHIBITS
EXHIBIT NUMBER EXHIBIT - ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3.1 -- Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 1994). 3.2 -- By-laws, as amended (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 1997).
42
EXHIBIT NUMBER EXHIBIT - ------- ------- 3.3 -- Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 1999). 4.1 -- Restated Articles of Incorporation (included as Exhibit 3.1). 4.2 -- By-laws (included as Exhibit 3.2). 4.3 -- Form of Common Stock certificate (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). 4.4 -- Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation (included as Exhibit 3.3). 4.5 -- Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003, among the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank and the Banks listed therein (filed herewith)(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003). 4.6 -- Term Credit Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003, among the Company, Golden Moores Finance Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank and the Banks listed therein (filed herewith). 4.7 -- Term Sheet Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003 evidencing the uncommitted CAN$10 million facility of National City Bank, Canada Branch to Golden Brand Clothing (Canada) Ltd. (filed herewith)(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.7 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003). 4.7 -- Indenture (including for of note) dated October 21, 2003 among the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee, relating to the Company's 3.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003). 4.8 -- Registration Rights Agreement dated October 21, 2003 among the Company and Bear Stearns & Co. Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Fleet Securities, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003). 4.9 -- First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated October 13, 2003 among the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank and the Banks listed therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003). *10.1 -- 1992 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). *10.2 -- First Amendment to 1992 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by Reference from Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-60516)). *10.3 -- 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). *10.4 -- First Amendment to 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). 10.5 -- Commercial Lease dated September 1, 1995, by and between the Company and Zig Zag, A Joint Venture (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 4, 1996). 10.6 -- Commercial Lease dated April 5, 1989, by and between the Company and Preston Road Partnership (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). *10.7 -- Stock Agreement dated as of March 23, 1992, between the Company and George Zimmer (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). *10.8 -- Split-Dollar Agreement and related Split-Dollar Collateral Assignment dated November 25, 1994 between the Company, George Zimmer and David Edwab, Co-Trustee of the Zimmer 1994 Irrevocable Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 1995).
45 *10.9 -- 1996 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 3, 1996). *10.10 -- Second Amendment to 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 3, 1996). *10.11 -- 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998). *10.12 -- First Amendment to 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (registration No. 333-80033)). *10.13 -- Second Amendment to 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2000).
43
EXHIBIT NUMBER EXHIBIT - ------- ------- *10.14 -- Third Amendment to The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 29, 2000). *10.15 -- Second Amendment [sic] to The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 29, 2000). *10.16 -- Fourth Amendment to 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 5, 2001). *10.17 -- Split-Dollar Agreement dated January 14, 2002, by and between the Company and Eric Lane (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002). *10.18 -- Split-Dollar Agreement and related Split-Dollar Collateral Assignment dated May 25, 1995, by and between the Company and David H. Edwab (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002). *10.19 -- Split-Dollar Agreement and related Split-Dollar Collateral Assignment dated May 25, 1995, between the Company, David H. Edwab and George Zimmer, Co-Trustee of the David H. Edwab 1995 Irrevocable Trust (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002). *10.20 -- First Amendment to Split-Dollar Agreement dated January 17, 2002, between the Company, David H. Edwab and George Zimmer, Trustee of the David H. Edwab 1995 Irrevocable Trust (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002). *10.21 -- Amended and Restated Employment Agreement datedeffective as of February 3, 2002,2003, by and between the Company and David H. Edwab (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.29 to the(filed herewith). 14.1 -- The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KCode of Ethics for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002)Senior Management (filed herein). 21.1 -- Subsidiaries of the Company (filed herewith). 23.1 -- Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors (filed herewith). 99.131.1 -- Certification of Annual Report Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith). 31.2 -- Certification of Annual Report Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith). 32.1 -- Certification of Annual Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith). 99.232.2 -- Certification of Annual Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith).
- ------------------------- * Management Compensation or Incentive Plan The Company will furnish a copy of any exhibit described above to any beneficial holder of its securities upon receipt of a written request therefor,therefore, provided that such request sets forth a good faith representation that, as of the record date for the Company's 20032004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such beneficial holder is entitled to vote at such meeting, and provided further that such holder pays to the Company a fee compensating the Company for its reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibits. (b) Reports on FormREPORTS ON FORM 8-K 46 On December 5, 2002,November 19, 2003, the Company filedfurnished to the SEC a current report on Form 8-K relatedpursuant to certain changes made toItem 12 reporting the Company's 401(k) Savings Plan. 44issuance of a press release that reported earnings results for the three and nine months ended November 1, 2003. 47 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. THE MEN'S WEARHOUSE, INC. By /s/ GEORGE ZIMMER ----------------------------------------------------------------- George Zimmer Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Dated: May 2, 2003April 15, 2004 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE --------- ----- ----- ------------------------ ------------------------------------------ -------------- /s/ GEORGE ZIMMER Chairman of the Board, May 2, 2003 ------------------------------------------------ Chief April 15, 2004 - ------------------------ Executive Officer and Director George Zimmer /s/ NEILL P. DAVIS Executive Vice President, Chief May 2, 2003 ------------------------------------------------ Financial April 15, 2004 - ------------------------ Officer and Principal Financial Officer Neill P. Davis Financial Officer /s/ DIANA M. WILSON Vice President and Principal May 2, 2003 ------------------------------------------------ Accounting April 15, 2004 - ------------------------ Officer Diana M. Wilson /s/ DAVID H. EDWAB Vice Chairman of the Board and May 2, 2003 ------------------------------------------------ Director April 15, 2004 - ------------------------ David H. Edwab /s/ RINALDO S. BRUTOCO Director May 2, 2003 ------------------------------------------------April 15, 2004 - ------------------------ Rinaldo S. Brutoco /s/ MICHAEL L. RAY Director May 2, 2003 ------------------------------------------------April 15, 2004 - ------------------------ Michael L. Ray /s/ SHELDON I. STEIN Director May 2, 2003 ------------------------------------------------April 15, 2004 - ------------------------ Sheldon I. Stein /s/ KATHLEES MASON Director ------------------------------------------------April 15, 2004 - ------------------------ Kathleen Mason
45 I, George Zimmer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Men's Wearhouse, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. By /s/ GEORGE ZIMMER ------------------------------------ George Zimmer Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Dated: May 2, 2003 46 I, Neill P. Davis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Men's Wearhouse, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. By /s/ NEILL P. DAVIS ------------------------------------ Neill P. Davis Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer Dated: May 2, 2003 4748 EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT NUMBER EXHIBIT - ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3.1 -- Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 1994). 3.2 -- By-laws, as amended (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 1997). 3.3 -- Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 1999). 4.1 -- Restated Articles of Incorporation (included as Exhibit 3.1). 4.2 -- By-laws (included as Exhibit 3.2). 4.3 -- Form of Common Stock certificate (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). 4.4 -- Articles of Amendment to the Restated Articles of Incorporation (included as Exhibit 3.3). 4.5 -- Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003, among the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank and the Banks listed therein (filed herewith)(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003). 4.6 -- Term Credit Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003, among the Company, Golden Moores Finance Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank and the Banks listed therein (filed herewith). 4.7 -- Term Sheet Agreement dated as of January 29, 2003 evidencing the uncommitted CAN$10 million facility of National City Bank, Canada Branch to Golden Brand Clothing (Canada) Ltd. (filed herewith)(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.7 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003). 4.7 -- Indenture (including for of note) dated October 21, 2003 among the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee, relating to the Company's 3.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003). 4.8 -- Registration Rights Agreement dated October 21, 2003 among the Company and Bear Stearns & Co. Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Fleet Securities, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003). 4.9 -- First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated October 13, 2003 among the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank and the Banks listed therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003). *10.1 -- 1992 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). *10.2 -- First Amendment to 1992 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by Reference from Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-60516)). *10.3 -- 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). *10.4 -- First Amendment to 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). 10.5 -- Commercial Lease dated September 1, 1995, by and between the Company and Zig Zag, A Joint Venture (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 4, 1996). 10.6 -- Commercial Lease dated April 5, 1989, by and between the Company and Preston Road Partnership (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). *10.7 -- Stock Agreement dated as of March 23, 1992, between the Company and George Zimmer (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-45949)). *10.8 -- Split-Dollar Agreement and related Split-Dollar Collateral Assignment dated November 25, 1994 between the Company, George Zimmer and David Edwab, Co-Trustee of the Zimmer 1994 Irrevocable Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 1995). *10.9 -- 1996 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 3, 1996). *10.10 -- Second Amendment to 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 3, 1996). *10.11 -- 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.18 to the
49 Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998).
48
EXHIBIT NUMBER EXHIBIT - ------- ------- *10.12 -- First Amendment to 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (registration No. 333-80033)). *10.13 -- Second Amendment to 1998 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2000). *10.14 -- Third Amendment to The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 29, 2000). *10.15 -- Second Amendment [sic] to The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 29, 2000). *10.16 -- Fourth Amendment to 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 5, 2001). *10.17 -- Split-Dollar Agreement dated January 14, 2002, by and between the Company and Eric Lane (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002). *10.18 -- Split-Dollar Agreement and related Split-Dollar Collateral Assignment dated May 25, 1995, by and between the Company and David H. Edwab (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002). *10.19 -- Split-Dollar Agreement and related Split-Dollar Collateral Assignment dated May 25, 1995, between the Company, David H. Edwab and George Zimmer, Co-Trustee of the David H. Edwab 1995 Irrevocable Trust (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002). *10.20 -- First Amendment to Split-Dollar Agreement dated January 17, 2002, between the Company, David H. Edwab and George Zimmer, Trustee of the David H. Edwab 1995 Irrevocable Trust (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002). *10.21 -- Amended and Restated Employment Agreement datedeffective as of February 3, 2002,2003, by and between the Company and David H. Edwab (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.29 to the(filed herewith). 14.1 -- The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KCode of Ethics for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002)Senior Management (filed herein). 21.1 -- Subsidiaries of the Company (filed herewith). 23.1 -- Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors (filed herewith). 99.131.1 -- Certification of Annual Report Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith). 31.2 -- Certification of Annual Report Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith). 32.1 -- Certification of Annual Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith). 99.232.2 -- Certification of Annual Report Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith).
- ------------------------- * Management Compensation or Incentive Plan 4950