UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20002001

Commission File No. 0-26770

NOVAVAX, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 22-2816046
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
8320 Guilford Road, Columbia, Maryland
 21046
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(301) 854-3900

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:Name of each exchange on which registered


Common Stock ($.01 par value)
American Stock Exchange
NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONECommon Stock ($.01 par value)

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x  No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

      The aggregate market value of 18,675,54820,973,202 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, held by non-affiliates of the registrant at March 16, 2001,8, 2002, as computed by reference to the closing price of such stock, was approximately $157,808,381.$221,057,549.

      The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding at March 16, 20018, 2002 was 22,247,53323,915,343 shares.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

     Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed not later than 120 days after December 31, 2000,2001, in connection with the Registrant’s 20012002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, referred to herein as the “Proxy Statement,” are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. Certain exhibits filed with the Registrant’s prior registration statements and periodperiodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are incorporated herein by reference into Part IV of this Report.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
CertificateSIGNATURES
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
See accompanying notes.
NOVAVAX, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands)
Employment Agreement- James R. Mirto
Employment Agreement-Dennis Genge
Agreement of Amendment dated December 18, 2000Lease-W.M.Rickman Construction Co.
Lease Agreement- GPG Enterprises
Lease Agreement
Facility Reservation Agreement
List of SusidiariesSubsidiaries
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PART I

Item 1.  Business

      The discussion of our business contained in this annual report on form 10-K may contain certain projections, estimates and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below at “Risks and Uncertainties.” While this outlook represents management’s current judgment on the future direction of the business, such risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from any future performance suggested below. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of this annual report.

Overview

      Novavax Inc. (“Novavax”, “we”, “our”, or the “Company”) is a fully-integrated specialty biopharmaceuticalpharmaceutical company engaged infocused on the research, development and commercialization of products utilizing our proprietary products focuseddrug delivery and vaccine technologies for large and growing markets, concentrating on the areas of women’s healthhealthcare and infectious diseases. Our lead product candidate, ESTRASORB™, is the first transdermal lotion for estrogen replacement therapy for which a New Drug Application has been accepted for filing by the Food and Drug Administration. The New Drug Application for ESTRASORB was submitted in June 2001 and was accepted for filing in August 2001. We were incorporatedare seeking FDA approval of ESTRASORB for the reduction of hot flashes in Delawaremenopausal women and, if approved, we believe ESTRASORB will be competitively positioned to address the $1.8 billion estrogen replacement therapy market in 1987. Our principal executive offices are located at 8320 Guilford Road, Columbia, Maryland 21046.the United States. In our Phase II and III clinical trials, women using ESTRASORB experienced a statistically significant reduction in the number of hot flashes, the primary endpoint of our study, with many women reporting a total elimination of hot flashes while using the product. We also believe that ESTRASORB offers additional advantages over other estrogen replacement therapies, including ease of use, more rapid onset of estrogen therapy and a lower incidence of skin irritation and nausea.

      ThroughOur drug delivery technologies involve the use of our patented oil and water emulsions which we believe can be used as vehicles for the transdermal and injectable delivery of a serieswide variety of strategic initiatives, Novavaxdrugs and other therapeutic products, including hormones, anti-bacterial and anti-viral products and vaccine adjuvants, which are substances added to vaccines to enhance their effectiveness. We believe that our technologies represent the first time that alcohol soluble hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone, have been encapsulated and delivered through the skin. In addition to ESTRASORB, our product candidates using these technologies include ANDROSORB™, a transdermal testosterone lotion that is in Phase II clinical trials, ANDRO-JECT™, a long-acting subcutaneous injectable formulation of testosterone that is in preclinical development, and a transdermal progestin lotion that is also in preclinical development. We also conduct research and development on preventative and therapeutic vaccines for a variety of infectious diseases.

      During 2001, we signed a co-promotion agreement with King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“King”) for the promotion and marketing of ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB within the United States and licensed to King the right to sell these products outside the United States. This relationship with King has evolvedthe potential to provide us with deeper women’s healthcare market penetration for ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB. We will record all revenues from the sales of ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB in the United States and will pay to King 50% of these revenues less 50% of manufacturing and approved marketing costs, subject to certain modifications. We received licensing fees of $3.0 million and milestone payments totaling $5.0 million from King upon the submission to the FDA and acceptance for filing of the ESTRASORB New Drug Application. We also received from King $20.0 million in December 2000 and $10.0 million in September 2001 in the form of convertible note financings.

      We currently market, sell and distribute a technology-based biotechnology company intoline of prescription pharmaceuticals and prenatal vitamins through our 85 person sales force including national accounts team, which has extensive experience selling to obstetricians, gynecologists, managed care organizations, wholesalers and retail pharmacies throughout the United States. In 2001, these products produced revenues of $17.3 million. If we receive marketing approval from the FDA, we expect to sell ESTRASORB both through our sales force and through King’s salesforce. We intend to manufacture ESTRASORB for commercial sale in a fully integrated pharmaceutical company. These strategic initiatives have included the:dedicated 20,000 square foot facility, which is currently being built to our requirements.

Our Strategy

      The primary elements of our strategy include:

 • AcquisitionMaximize the commercial impact of a profitableESTRASORB.We are currently developing commercialization and manufacturing infrastructures, programs and systems in anticipation of approval of our ESTRASORB New

2


Drug Application by the FDA in 2002. We believe that our marketing plan, together with the significant expertise of our management team in new product launches, will enable ESTRASORB to rapidly penetrate the $1.8 billion estrogen replacement therapy market in the U.S. We expect that the introduction of ESTRASORB, if approved, will increase our presence in the women’s healthcare pharmaceutical company;market, thereby enabling us to more effectively commercialize future products which we develop or acquire. Our co-promotion agreement with King should provide us with additional marketing and selling expertise which will assist us in achieving deeper market penetration for ESTRASORB.
 
 • AcquisitionLeverage our unique drug delivery technology platforms to commercialize additional pharmaceutical products.A key component of a fully staffed vaccine manufacturingour growth strategy is the introduction of new products based on our proprietary drug delivery technologies. In addition to ESTRASORB, we have three hormone replacement therapy candidates in various stages of clinical and development operation;preclinical development. We will continue to focus on developing improvements to existing therapies. We intend to target large markets where our products can be differentiated through increased efficacy and improved delivery technique.
 
 • ExpansionContinue to develop our capabilities as a fully-integrated specialty pharmaceutical company.We intend to continue to enhance our internal capabilities in the developing, testing, manufacturing and marketing of our product candidates. We believe that this fully-integrated platform differentiates us from many specialty pharmaceutical companies and enhances our ability to successfully introduce new products such as ESTRASORB and to grow our existing line of women’s healthcare products. We plan to continue to focus our research and development efforts on advancing our existing product lines through product purchasescandidates towards commercialization and co-promotion agreements;on identifying and commercializing new therapies using our unique drug delivery techniques. We perform many components of the ESTRASORB manufacturing process, and we are increasing our manufacturing capabilities in anticipation of the commercial launch of ESTRASORB in 2002. We have an 85 person sales force including national accounts team with experience in the area of women’s health, and intend to continue to build that sales team as we are able to commercialize or acquire new products.
 
 • CompletionContinue to expand our product lines through acquisition of a pivotal Phase III clinical trial fornew products and technologies.We believe we can continue to grow through the acquisition of product lines, individual products or additional technologies. We believe numerous opportunities exist to acquire such products and technologies as large pharmaceutical companies seek to divest many non-core product areas. We regularly evaluate opportunities to acquire products in markets we currently serve, as well as potential new markets where our estrogen replacementmanagement team has expertise, such as oncology. Our fully-integrated capabilities assist us in identifying, acquiring and successfully implementing new product ESTRASORB™.and company acquisitions.

      These initiatives were funded through two private placements ofWe have demonstrated our common stock in 1999ability to successfully acquire and 2000integrate products and the issuance of a convertible note in 2000.

Recent Developments

research capabilities. For example, we acquired Fielding Pharmaceutical Company Acquisition

      Inin December 2000, we acquired the privately owned Fielding Pharmaceutical Company (“Fielding”), based in St. Louis, Missouri, which sells, markets and distributes a proprietary line of pharmaceutical products focused on women’s health. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Fielding for $31.5 million, consisting of $13 million in cash and 2,312,501 shares of Novavax common stock, valued at $18.5 million. An additional $5 million in either Novavax common stock or cash will be paidenabled us to former Fielding shareholders in March 2002.

      Fielding was established in 1959 and marketsexpand our women’s healthcare products nationally toproduct line and gave us an established national sales force with experience calling on obstetricians and gynecologists through its sales force of over 60 personnel. Fielding’sthroughout the United States. In January 2001, we purchased the AVC™ Cream product line from King to provide us with additional products included Nestabs®, a complete line of pre-natal vitamins; Gynodiol®, an oral form of estrogen replacement therapy, as well as several other over-the-counter (“OTC”) women’s healthcare products. We intend to use Fielding to sell market and distribute additional future products. Fielding fills, packages and warehouses all of its own products, which are purchased from contract manufacturers.

Biomedical Services Laboratory Acquisition

through our sales force. In August 1999, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Biomedical Services Laboratory (“BSD”) division of DynCorp of Reston, Virginia. The total consideration and direct costs for the acquisition were $860,000. Thea vaccine research and development activities of BSD are conducted in an approximately 12,000 square foot facility located in Rockville, Maryland. BSD is engaged in contract research, development and pilot manufacturing of human vaccines for government laboratories, principally National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), and othergroup from DynCorp, which has enabled us to develop advanced vaccine companies.product candidates.

2
• Exploit our expertise in vaccine technology to develop products for a large and underserved market.We currently have several vaccine candidates in clinical and preclinical development. In particular, we are pursuing an inactivated smallpox vaccine and a human papillomavirus vaccine that we believe could address large and underserved markets if approved. In order to pursue a number of vaccine development programs, we intend to collaborate with private companies and governmental agencies, including the National Institutes of Health, with which we have several ongoing projects.

3


King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Transactions

      In December 2000, King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (“King”) agreed to make a $25 million convertible note investment in Novavax. The note is convertible into Novavax Common Stock at $10.00 per share. The note carries a 4% coupon payable semi-annually in cash and stock. As part of the transaction, we received $20 million in December 2000 and will receive an additional $5 million when we file a New Drug Application (“NDA”) for our topical transdermal estrogen replacement therapy, ESTRASORB™, expected to be filed in the first half of 2001. We used a portion of the funds to complete our acquisition of Fielding and will use the balance for general operating purposes. In January 2001, we also signed a co-promotion agreement with King for ESTRASORB™, in the United States. In addition, we will combine U.S. sales efforts with King to begin co-promoting one of King’s products already on the market, Nordette®, a birth control pill. In another agreement, we also acquired AVC™ Cream and Suppositories from King in January 2001, for $3.3 million, which has been marketed by King for the treatment of vaginal bacterial infections.

Our Products and Product Candidates

      We are focused on the successful introduction of new product candidates and the continued sales growth of the products we currently market. The tablestable below provides a summary of our marketed products and product development candidates, which are discussed elsewhere in further detail herein:

Women’s Health Productsdetail:

     
Product orIndications
Product CandidateProduct DescriptionPartnerStatus




Nestabs® Prescription Pre-Natal Vitaminsprenatal vitamins Marketed
Gynodiol®
Gynodiol
 Oral Estrogen Replacement Therapyestrogen replacement therapy Marketed
Vitelle®OTC Women’s Health Products Marketed
AVCcream and suppositories
 Vaginal Bacterial Infectionbacterial infection Marketed
Nordette® (co-promote) Birth Control Pillcontrol pillKing (co-promotion) Marketed
ESTRASORB
 Transdermal Lotionlotion for Estrogenestrogen replacement Phase IIIKing (co-promotion)NDA filed
ANDROSORB
 Transdermal Lotionlotion for Testosteronetestosterone replacement King (co-promotion)Phase I/II
HPV16 vaccineHuman papillomavirus vaccineNIH/ KingPhase II
ANDRO-JECTTM
 Injectable Testosterone TherapytestosteronePreclinical
Progestin lotionTransdermal lotion for progestin replacementPreclinical
Inactivated smallpox vaccineSmallpox (vaccinia) Preclinical

     Infectious Disease Vaccines

ProductCollaboraton/PartnerStatus



Human Papillomavirus (“HPV16”) VLP (mono)NIH/KingPhase II
Hepatitis E VaccineNIHPhase I
Dengue Type 4NIHIND
Malaria MSP-1NIH/SAICPreclinical
Influenza VaccineKingPreclinical
HPV16 (chimeric)NIH/KingPreclinical

Our Lead Product Development ProgramsCandidate — ESTRASORB

      Our product development efforts are focused on the research and development of proprietary drug delivery and vaccine technologies and the applications of those technologies. Our technology platforms involve the use of proprietary, microscopic, organized, non-phospholipid structures as vehicles for the delivery of a wide variety of drugs and other therapeutic products, including certain hormones, anti-bacterial and anti-viral products and vaccine adjuvants. These technology platforms support three product development programs: hormone replacement therapies, third party drug delivery and vaccine adjuvant applications. In addition, BSDESTRASORB is engaged in contract research and development and Phase I and Phase II vaccine manufacturing of human vaccines for the Company’s own use, for government laboratories and for other vaccine companies.

3


Hormone Replacement Therapies. The Company’s hormone replacement therapy program includes its two lead product candidates: ESTRASORB, topical estrogen cream, and ANDROSORB, a topical testosterone cream. ESTRASORB, a topical lotion for estrogen replacement therapy is the company’sour lead product candidate and employs Novavax’s proprietaryour patented micellar nanoparticle (“MNP”) technology. ESTRASORB’s MNP formulation is designedtechnology to deliver estrogen, in the form of 17ß estradiol, a naturally occurring hormone, through the skin when applied topically in lotion form. The Company has completed various preclinical and human safety studiesthe form of a lotion. We submitted a New Drug Application for both ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB. The Company completed a multi-center Phase III studyESATRASORB to the FDA in June 2001, which was accepted for filing in August 2001. We are seeking FDA approval of ESTRASORB duringfor the first quarterreduction of 2001. The study was designed to measure ESTRASORB’s ability to deliver estradiol through the skin, when applied as a topical lotion. The randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial enrolled a total of 200 women either on placebo orhot flashes in menopausal women. In clinical trials, participants using ESTRASORB who underwent a 13 week course of treatment. The study results indicate that there isexperienced a statistically significant difference between ESTRASORB and placebo treatment with respect to the trial’s primary clinical endpoint, a reduction in the number of hot flushes.flashes, the primary endpoint of the studies, with many reporting the complete elimination of hot flashes during the trial period. We intend to file an NDA forbelieve that ESTRASORB offers advantages over competing therapies in the first half of 2001. The Company has also completed Phase I safety study in men of ANDROSORB; Phase II trials in testosterone deficient women were completed$1.8 billion estrogen replacement market in the fourth quarter of 2000. In addition, the CompanyUnited States. ESTRASORB is undergoing preclinical development of ANDRO-JECT, a depot delivery of testosterone for testosterone deficient men. The Investigational New Drug application (“IND”) for ANDRO-JECT is expected to be filed in the first half of 2001.

Third Party Drug Delivery and Vaccine Adjuvant Applications.Formulations of the Company’s lipid technologies are expected to have broad application as vehicles for the encapsulation and delivery of drugs developed by other companies. Moreover, the Company believes that certain of its organized lipid structures may provide effective and safe adjuvant carrier systems for a variety of vaccines. The Company plans to leverage these technologies by licensing its drug delivery, encapsulation and adjuvant technologies to third parties for specific therapeutic indications.

Vaccine Development. BSD is involved in three areas of vaccine development: virology, tissue culture and molecular virology. BSD’s experimental virology research and development may lead to live virus vaccine production in the embryonated hens’ eggs and in designated tissue culture systems. Tissue culture involves the growth, maintenance and characterization of cell systems as potential substrates for virus growth and vaccine production as well as cell systems for safety testing, plaque-purification and virus titers. BSD’s work in molecular virology involves recombinant DNA cloning of viral and human genes, protein expression of these genes in prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems including baculoviruses, protein purification of the recombinant protein products, and biophysical characterization of recombinant proteins leading to vaccine and related product development.

Anti-Microbial Agents. The Company is also applying its lipid technologies to develop anti-microbial agents that are capable of acting on viruses, bacteria, spores and sperm. Potential product candidates include Helicore®, an oral anti-bacterial preparation for the treatment ofHelicobacter pylori(“H. Pylori”) infection, and two anti-microbial agents targeting biological threat agents such as Bacillus anthracis and influenza A, respectively, as well as a spermicide product candidate.

Product Technology Platforms

      Novavax has developed proprietary topical, oral and injectable drug delivery technologies using microscopic, organized, non-phospholipid structures, including Novasome® non-phospholipid vesicles (“Novasomes”), MNP’s and non-antibiotic, anti-microbial lipid emulsions. The Company believes these structures may be useful for targeted delivery and controlled release of certain drugs, along with inactivation of bacteria, enveloped viruses, spores and sperm. Moreover, the Company believes that certain of its organized lipid structures may provide effective and safe adjuvant carrier systems for a variety of vaccines.

      Although other companies have developed liposome technologies, most commercial liposomes are composed of delicate phospholipids. Due to their inherent lack of stability and carrying capacity, only a limited number of drugs may be used with these phospholipid liposomes. While capable of encapsulating certain (principally water-soluble) drugs, phospholipid liposomes have a number of other significant disadvantages including their expense and the

4


needeasy to use potentially hazardous organic solvents in their manufacture. In addition,and lowers the standard, multi-step phospholipid manufacturing process is relatively expensive.

      The Company believes its non-phospholipid technologies may allow for a more cost-effective deliveryincidence of a wider variety of drugsskin irritation and stomach upset associated with other therapeutics than commercially available phospholipid liposomes and other delivery vehicles. Its technologies may also be preferred over other available transdermal delivery systems because its technologies may reduce side effects such as skin irritation. Future applications may show advantages over injectable delivery technologies, which are invasive, inconvenient and sometimes painful. In addition, the Company’s anti-microbial lipid emulsions may avoid the problem of pathogen mutation and resistance because of their non-antibioticestrogen replacement products. Our marketing studies indicate that ESTRASORB’s method of action.

Novasome Non-Phospholipid Vesicles.  Novasomes are proprietary structures in which drugs ortopical application will differentiate ESTRASORB from other materials can be encapsulated for delivery into the body topically or orally. Novasomes are made using the Company’s patented manufacturing processes from a variety of readily available chemicals called amphiphiles, which include fatty alcohols and acids, ethoxylated fatty alcohols and acids, glycol esters of fatty acids, glycerol fatty acid mono and diesters, ethoxylated glycerol fatty acid esters, glyceryl ethers, fatty acid diethanolamides and dimethyl amides, fatty acyl sarcosinates, alkyds and phospholipids.

      The Company plans to commercialize its Novasome technology in part through products it develops itself and in part through third party drug delivery application licenses. The Company believes that certain of its organized lipid structures may provide effective and safe adjuvant carrier systems for a variety of vaccines. In addition, the Company has developed structures for delivery of biologically active molecules like antisense, genes and proteins.

Micellar Nanoparticle Emulsion.  MNPs are proprietary, submicron-sized, water miscible, non-phospholipid structures that have different structural characteristics and are generally smaller than Novasome non-phospholipid vesicles. MNP’s, like Novasome non-phospholipid vesicles, are derived from amphiphilic molecules.

      Novavax scientists have demonstrated that MNP’s are able to incorporate alcohol soluble drugs, pesticides, vaccine adjuvants, proteins, whole viruses, flavors, fragrances and colors. MNP’s also have the ability to entrap ethanol or methanol soluble drugs, and to deliver certain of these drugs transdermally through intact skin. The MNP formulations used by Novavax for the transdermal delivery of drugs have cosmetic properties similar to creams and lotions. These transdermal formulations have the advantage over injectable delivery systems of being less invasive and/or inconvenient and the may also cause less skin irritation than patch transdermal delivery systems. MNP’s are the fundamental technology platform for Novavax’s hormoneestrogen replacement therapies.

Vaccine ResearchMarket Overview.As a woman approaches menopause, ovulation becomes less frequent and Development

      BSD is engaged in contract research, development and pilot manufacturing of human vaccines for the Company’s own use and for government laboratories and other vaccine companies. The Director of our vaccine programs is Louis Potash, Ph.D., one of the original scientists to work on both the Salk-type inactivated polio vaccines and inactivated whole influenza virus vaccines during the 1950s. This acquisition significantly expanded Novavax’s internal vaccine developmental capabilities and allows the Company to combine its adjuvant technology with BSD’s 35 years of experience in developing and manufacturing vaccines.

      BSD’s facility is a vaccine research and development laboratory producing Phase I and II clinical materials in accordance with the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) regulations. The facility develops and produces live virus suspensions and vaccines and recombinant proteins from baculovirus infected insect cells and E. coli for government, industrial pharmaceutical, biotech and academic clients at lab bench and pilot production scales. Services include experimental vaccine development,in vivoandin vitrovaccine safety testing, large-scale virus seed pool production in tissue culture and embryonated hens’ eggs, the production and testing of tissue culture systems, and final container filling in ampules, in cryules and in aluminum-crimped cap vials. Additionally,

5


repository management including specimen receipt, storage, tracking, and shipment for thousands of biological samples is available.

      BSD is one of the few locations in the world that produces experimental live viral vaccines for Phase I and II clinical trials. Our professional expertise lies in live virus suspensions (both attenuated and wild type), recombinant live virus suspensions, inactivated virus suspensions, recombinant baculovirus expression, recombinant virus-like particles (“VLP”s), recombinant protein purification, and cancer immunotherapeutics. VLP’s are non-infectious, self-assembled macro-molecules comprised of viral capsid proteins that elicit neutralizing antibodies and cellular immune response. Novavax has developed several VLP’s using its proprietary design and manufacturing processes.

      Some of our recent achievements in the vaccine field include:

• More than 200 final virus vaccines for clinical studies with no untoward effects, including those for influenza, parainfluenza, rotaviruses and vaccinia recombinants
• The development of several Phase I therapeutic cancer vaccines
• The development of VLP’s subunit vaccines for human caliciviruses, rotaviruses, human papillomavirus, hepatitis and others

Virology Laboratory

      The virology laboratory, has produced and safety tested experimental live virus vaccines and suspensions propagated in tissue cultures and in embryonated hens’ eggs for the NIH, commercial, and academic clients since 1964. The laboratory, currently staffed by a senior staff scientist/co-Principal investigator and five research technicians, has produced and safety tested over 200 live virus vaccines and suspensions. These vaccines have consisted of wild type parent strains as well as attenuated and/or mutant strains of viruses such as rotaviruses (human, human X bovine, human X rhesus, and human x human reassortants), influenza viruses (human H3N2, H1N1, H2N2 and B; avian and avian X human reassortants), respiratory syncytial viruses (subgroups A and B), parainfluenza viruses (human types 1, 2 and 3; bovine type 3), dengue, cytomegalovirus, and vaccinia virus recombinants. Release/ Manufacturing Protocols, written in a format suitable for submission to the FDA as part of IND applications, are submitted to the Regulatory Affairs Branch of the sponsoring organization. The majority of the virus suspensions and vaccines produced have received FDA approval for use in Phase I and II clinical studies. The rotaviruses have been administered orally, whereas the respiratory viruses (influenza, parainfluenza and respiratory syncytial viruses) have been administered intranasally in newborns as well as in geriatric populations and in-between age groups. Other viruses studied include herpes, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, Coxsackie, polioviruses and bovin virus diarrhea virus (“BVD”).

      The virology laboratory possesses its proprietary characterized and patented African Green monkey kidney cell line used for the production of experimental live virus fluidsestrogen decreases. Eventually, the estrogen produced is insufficient to bring about menstruation. Menopause is typically diagnosed when there has been an absence of menstruation for at least one year accompanied by the presence of hot flashes. Women are entering menopause at the rate of approximately 4,000 per day. An estimated 10.0 million women are currently on estrogen replacement therapy. This number is forecast to increase to 12.8 million in 2004 as diagnosis and vaccines as well as for virus isolation from human specimens such as nasal swabs, throat washesmedication efficacy increase and feces. This serially passaged monkey kidney cell line has a Master Drug Fileside effects associated with the FDA, as does the proprietary characterized Merieux line of Vero cells. In addition, BSD has stocks of other similarly characterized cell lines suitable for virus vaccine production such as FRhL-2 and CV-1 cells as well as many other cell lines suitable for research and development efforts and for diagnostic purposes. BSD has the capability for final container filling in ampules, in cryules, in screw cap vials, and in aluminum crimped-cap vials in its newly renovated and validated filling room.

Molecular Virology Laboratory

therapy decrease. The molecular virology laboratory, under the direction of Dr. Robin Robinson, is staffed by three senior scientists, and four research technicians. The scopedemographic expansion of the laboratory expertise ranges from molecular DNA cloning to protein production and purification from prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems to biophysical characterization of protein molecules. These expression systems include numerous plasmids in E. coli, baculovirus in insect cells, and semliki forest virus, adenovirus, and other virus expression in mammalian cells including primate and human cells. Proprietary insect lines for production of clinical materials have been developed and validated.

6


      Cloning genes of interest is performed in BSD’s plasmid and viral vectors, which are designed for maximal protein expression and to facilitate protein purification and formulation. Cell fermentation in BSD’s proprietary cell lines ranges from 50 milliliter shaker flasks to 30 liter bioreactors. Protein purification utilizes conventional, expanded bed adsorption, and affinity–TAG chromatographic techniques using FPLC and HPLC systems. Development and production VLPs from multiple virus systems are available for single and chimeric-particles. Available analytical methods for protein characterization include gel electrophoresis, immunodetection by Western blotting and quantitative ELISA, glycosylation analyses by DIG-labeling glycan binding assays, immunoelectro-focusing, quantitative HPLC methods, peptide mapping, automated amino acid sequencing and composition determination, and mass spectroscopy. Other capabilities include virus removal from hybridoma and ascites fluids. These services represent a comprehensive program to deliver genes from the lab bench to vectors compatible for commercial production to express high levels of recombinant proteins as secreted and/or intracellular molecules, and to purify these proteins to homogeneity by technology easily transferred to large-scale commercial production.

Novavax Product Candidates

Hormone Replacement Therapy

      The Company is using its MNP technology“baby boomer” generation will cause an increase in the development of ESTRASORB, a cream designedestrogen replacement therapy market as more women reach the ages associated with menopause and seek medical attention for the delivery of 17b estradiol (estrogen hormone) through the skin.their symptoms.

      Estrogen replacement therapy is currently used worldwide by menopausal women to treat the symptoms of menopause, such as hot flashes, and by post-menopausal women to prevent osteoporosis cardiovascular disease and other menopausal symptoms (such as “hot flushes”). The hormone replacement market in the US is approximately $1.7 billion. This market is believed to represent only 15-20% of the estimated 60.3 million women over 40 years of age in the US who could potentially benefit from hormone replacement therapy.

adverse health conditions. Current estrogen replacement products include oral tablets and, more recently, transdermal patches. OralUsers of oral estrogen tablets however, have been associated withmay sometimes experience the side effects primarily resulting from blood hormone level fluctuations. Becauseeffect of these side effects, transdermalnausea. Transdermal patches for estrogen replacement were developed. While thesedeveloped in large part to eliminate this side effect of nausea and first became commercially available in the mid 1980’s. Patches generally use alcohol to drive the estrogen through the skin to achieve therapeutic blood levels. These patches help reduce blood hormone fluctuations, they may cause skin irritation and the inconvenience to the patient inconvenience associated with wearing and changing an external patch. As shown by the chart below, in the

      The Company believes that ESTRASORB may offer several advantages over existing therapies used for4


12 months ended September 30, 2001, the estrogen replacement. ESTRASORB may be applied toreplacement market in the skin much like a typical cosmetic lotion. The Company believes ESTRASORB will be able to deliver a continuous amount of estrogen to the patient without the fluctuations in blood hormone levels associatedU.S. was approximately $1.8 billion, with oral tablets. In addition, ESTRASORB does not contain materials that may cause the skin irritation associated with transdermal patches.

      The Company has completed five clinical studies with ESTRASORB. The first three studies demonstrated transdermal deliveryapproximately 78% of the drugmarket using oral estrogen replacement therapy and no skin irritation was noted.14% of the market using transdermals.

Clinical Trials of ESTRASORB.We have completed several preclinical and human safety and efficacy studies for ESTRASORB. A Phase II randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was completed in the first quarter of 1999. This study1999 involved a 35 day35-day dosing protocol and included 120 patients at six clinical sites located in the United States. This study indicated that ESTRASORB, administered daily to menopausal women, significantly reduced the number of hot flushesflashes per day and significantly increased their trough serum estradiol levels.

      Duringday. In the first quarter of 2001, Novavaxwe completed a multi-centerpivotal Phase III study at 21 centers in the U.S. designed to determine the efficacy of ESTRASORB in symptomaticreducing the frequency of hot flashes in menopausal women. The Phase III study involvedwas a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study involving approximately 200 subjectsparticipants. During this study, a 3.0-gram daily dose of either ESTRASORB or placebo lotion was administered to the thigh and calf of each participant, with approximately 100 participants receiving ESTRASORB and the remainder receiving the placebo lotion. The results indicated that at weeks 3 through 12, ESTRASORB was statistically significantly superior to the placebo lotion in 20 centersreducing the mean daily number of hot flashes. The Phase III study further demonstrated that ESTRASORB had no clinically relevant adverse effect on laboratory safety parameters, vital signs or dermal assessments. In June 2001, we submitted a New Drug Application to the FDA, which was accepted for filing in August 2001, for approval to market ESTRASORB for the treatment of hot flashes in menopausal women.

Marketing of ESTRASORB.The U.S. marketplace for estrogen replacement therapy is heavily saturated by competitors. In response, we have prepared an aggressive launch and marketing strategy for ESTRASORB. Our marketing efforts will target the high-volume prescribers and early adopters of women’s healthcare products. Our public relations plan will focus on the ways in which ESTRASORB’s topical method of application will assist in counteracting the poor compliance rate currently associated with estrogen replacement therapy. We have also established a Physician Advisory Board to advise us with respect to our goal of early adoption of ESTRASORB by targeted physicians. These efforts will be further supplemented by a publications strategy aimed toward the inclusion in specialty medical publications of in-depth clinical information regarding ESTRASORB.

5


Currently Marketed Products

      Our acquisition of Fielding in 2000 enabled us to expand our women’s healthcare product line and provided us with an established national sales force having extensive experience in selling to obstetricians and gynecologists throughout the United States. The acquisition included the Nestabs® product line and Gynodiol™, described below, and a sales force of 59 people. We believe that the expertise gained through the marketing of these products positions us for a successful launch of ESTRASORB, if approved by the FDA. We currently market the following four women’s healthcare prescription products:

Nestabs®. Nestabs is a complete line of prenatal multivitamins for use before, during and after pregnancy. The product line includes Nestabs® Rx, Nestabs® CBF and Nestabs® FA. The Nestabs products are designed to prevent and control iron deficiency through low-dose iron supplementation. Nestabs provides a convenient once-a-day dosing regimen and a patient-friendly small, easy to swallow tablet. The Nestabs product line generated $11.3 million in sales in 2001.

Gynodiol™.Gynodiol is a safe, effective and economical option for women who require an oral estrogen replacement therapy, and is available in four dosage strengths. Gynodiol is indicated for the relief of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause, the treatment of vulval and vaginal atrophy, the treatment of hypoestrogenism and the prevention of osteoporosis. Gynodiol is the only estradiol product available in a 1.5 mg strength, allowing for more precise titration. The total sales for Gynodiol in 2001 were $2.2 million.

AVC™ Cream and Suppositories.AVC cream and suppositories are an established line of women’s hygiene products effective for the treatment of vaginal bacterial infection. AVC is designed to block certain metabolic processes essential for the growth of susceptible bacteria. We acquired the AVC product line from King for $3.3 million in 2001 and we believe there is opportunity for sales growth because AVC is the only sulfanilamide, in either a cream or suppository, on the market. The AVC product line generated $3.5 million in sales in 2001.

Nordette®. Nordette is an oral contraceptive owned by King. In partnership with King, we co-promote this product to obstetricians and gynecologists nationwide. The study was designedrevenues are booked by King and we receive a payment from King which reflects 50% of these revenues above an established quarterly baseline, less related manufacturing and approved marketing expenses, subject to measure ESTRASORB’s abilitycertain baseline modifications.

Other Hormone Replacement Therapy Product Candidates

      We are using our innovative drug delivery technologies to expand our product pipeline through the development of new product candidates, including a testosterone replacement therapy product for women. Our hormone replacement therapy program includes the following products:

ANDROSORB™.ANDROSORB employs our patented micellar nanoparticle technology to deliver 17b estradioltestosterone through the skin, when applied astopically in lotion form. Although generally associated with men, testosterone is also a topical lotion. The study results indicatenaturally occurring hormone in women. As a woman ages, she may experience a variety of symptoms of testosterone deficiency, including poor libido or sexual responsiveness, depression and cardiovascular, musculoskeletal and urological problems. ANDROSORB may be useful to treat the symptoms of testosterone deficiency, a condition that there is a statistically significant difference between ESTRASORB and placebo treatment with respect to the trial’s primary clinical endpoint, a reductionincreasingly prevalent in the number of hot flushes.our aging population.

      The positive reactions of theTo date, there have been no approved testosterone therapy products for women in the Phase II study coupled with the Company’s positive Phase III clinical results indicate thatU.S. other than a product which combines estrogen replacement therapy is an excellent initial target for the Company’s topical drug delivery system. As the Company begins the final stages of clinical development with ESTRASORB and files for an NDA, the Company will continue to investigate its topical delivery system to other products.

      Testosterone replacement therapy is currently used by males who are testosterone deficient as a result of either primary or secondary hypogonadism. It is believed that testosterone in males is required to maintain sexual function and libido, maintain lean body mass, increase hemoglobin synthesis and maintain bone density. There are estimated

7


to be one million testosterone deficient men in the US. It is further estimated that only 100,000 to 150,000 men are currently being treated for testosterone deficiency. These numbers are expected to grow with the aging of the population and the increasing awareness of the benefits of hormone replacement therapy.

testosterone. Current testosterone replacement therapy products for men include deep intramuscular injections, or transdermal patches.patches and gels. The injections require frequent visits to a physician and may be associated with pain at the injection site and abscess. The transdermal patches may cause skin irritation and patient inconvenience associated with wearing and changing external patches.

      The Company believes We believe that ANDROSORB (its testosterone hormone replacement therapy product) may offer several advantages over these current testosterone replacement therapies. ANDROSORB is a lotion that may be applied to the skin, thus eliminating the need for intramuscular injections. In addition, ANDROSORB does not contain materials that may cause the skin irritation associated with transdermal patches. The Company completed human safety studies of ANDROSORB involving 10 subjects and submitted the results to the FDA in the third quarter of 1997. A multiple-dose, pharmacokinetic study involving 9 subjects was completed in the fourth quarter of 1997, and a dose-ranging pharmacokinetic study involving 8 subjects was completed in the second quarter of 1998. The Company completed Phase I testing of ANDROSORB in 1999, with results that indicated ANDROSORB did not cause skin irritation in the patients tested. These studies have also all demonstrated delivery of the drug successfully results in elevated blood hormone levels. The CompanyWe completed a Phase II dose ranging study in testosterone deficient women in the fourth quarter of 2000.2000 and expect to begin additional Phase II trials in the first quarter of 2002.

6


     ANDRO-JECT™.We also have in preclinical development ANDRO-JECT, isa depot delivery system for testosterone. ANDRO-JECT represents our initial application for our Sterisome technology, a new oil-free, cholesterol-free depot drug delivery system for testosterone, which is in preclinical development.system. ANDRO-JECT is delivered subcutaneously with a small, 25 gauge needle.needle and potentially has long-lasting effects. In animal studies, therapeutic levels of testosterone were maintained for two weeks after one subcutaneous injection. We expect to file an INDInvestigational New Drug application for ANDRO-JECT in the first half of 2001.2002.

Progestin Lotion.We are also currently undertaking preclinical development of a transdermal progestin lotion. We expect to file an Investigational New Drug application for this product in the second half of 2002. The use of progestins in combination with estrogen is becoming standard therapy for menopausal women who take estrogen replacement therapy and have an intact uterus. The use of ESTRASORB in combination with our progestin lotion would compete with estrogen/progestin combination products.

     Infectious DiseasesMicrobicides

      We develop and produce live virus suspensions and vaccines for governmental, commercial and academic clients. Our capabilities include experimental vaccine development, vaccine safety testing, production and testing of tissue culture systems and repository management, including the storage, tracking and shipment of thousands of biological specimens. In addition, we have one of the few locations in the world that produces experimental live viral vaccines for Phase I and II clinical trials. We also develop recombinant virus-like particles for use as vaccines against infectious diseases.

      Our vaccine product candidates include the following:

HPV 16 Vaccine.Our human papillomavirus type 16 virus-like particle vaccine product, a single protein vaccine, is being developed with sponsorship by the National Cancer Institute. Expected to begin lengthy Phase III trials in Costa Rica in 2002, the vaccine is being tested for the prevention of human papillomavirus infection, which has been implicated in a majority of cases of cervical cancer. We are also developing a multi-protein human papillomavirus vaccine which will be tested for the treatment and prevention of human papillomavirus infection. This multi-protein vaccine, which also uses our virus-like particle technology, is currently in pre-clinical development.

Inactivated Smallpox Vaccine.Based upon the potential threat of a smallpox outbreak due to terrorist activity, there is an urgent need for a safe and effective smallpox vaccine which can be administered to the entire U.S. population. The Company has developed proprietary lipid structurescurrent live virus smallpox vaccine cannot safely be given to all persons. There are a significant number of people, up to 20% of the total population by some estimates, who may experience severe reactions to a live vaccine due to weakened immune systems. For example, people with HIV/ AIDS, the elderly, transplant recipients and people on chemotherapy may have compromised immune systems. We have in pre-clinical development an inactivated smallpox vaccine which may have a better safety profile than that it is usingof the existing live virus vaccine. Initial animal studies indicate that our inactivated smallpox vaccine achieved an immune response comparable to that of the live smallpox vaccine. We are currently in discussions with the NIH regarding the further development of this vaccine and we believe that Phase I trials could be initiated in 2002.

Collaborative Agreements

      We have significant involvement in collaborations, sponsored research agreements and preclinical and clinical testing agreements with academic institutions and with U.S. government agencies in connection with the development of our pharmaceutical product candidates and our vaccine adjuvants. For example, we have executed a non-antibiotic, anti-bacterial preparation, Helicore,Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the NIH under which we are working, in cooperation with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases branch of the NIH, to make and evaluate a malaria vaccine candidate. Current efforts under this agreement are focused on producing a vaccine based on an antigen present in the malaria parasite responsible for the treatmentgreatest mortality from this disease worldwide. We have also executed a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the NIH which is directed towards our work with the Stroke Branch ofH. pyloriinfection in humans.H. pyloriwas recognized in 1994 by the National InstitutesInstitute of Health as a causative agentNeurological Disorders department of peptic ulcer disease, antral gastritisthe NIH. The principal goal of this agreement is to evaluate the safety of therapeutics for the

7


prevention of strokes. These and certain typesother collaborative agreements provide us with the opportunity to utilize the technical expertise and staff of gastric cancer. Current therapies for the treatmentinstitutions involved and to gain access to clinical evaluation models, patients and related technologies.

Our Platform Technologies

TechnologyDescriptionProducts



Micellar NanoparticlesSubmicron-sized, water miscible, lipid structures derived from amphiphilic molecules which allow transdermal delivery of alcohol-soluble materialsESTRASORB and ANDROSORB
Novasomes®Non-phospholipid liposomes which can be used as an adjuvant to enhance vaccine effectivenessSmallpox vaccine
Virus-like particlesNon-infectious self assembling protein vaccinesHuman papillomavirus vaccine and Malaria vaccine
SterisomeSubcutaneous injections which deliver long-acting drug effectANDRO-JECT

      Our product development efforts are focused on the research and development ofH. pyloriinclude proprietary transdermal, oral and injectable drug delivery and vaccine technologies and the applications of those technologies. Our technology platforms involve the use of antibiotics alone or antibiotics in combination withproprietary microscopic lipid structures as vehicles for the delivery of a wide variety of drugs that inhibit acid production inand other therapeutic products, including hormones, anti-bacterial and anti-viral products and vaccine adjuvants. In addition, our vaccine technology can be utilized for the stomach. Problems associated with such therapies include, but are not limited to, cost, toxicity, failure to sufficiently eradicate all the bacteria,development of prophylactic and acquired resistance to the antibiotic. In 1995, the Company began to test formulationstherapeutic vaccines. We believe our innovative technologies may allow for a more cost-effective and stable delivery of Helicore in both animal studiesa wider variety of drugs and Phase I human safety studies. Results from clinical studies completed in 1996 were submitted to the FDA. Novavax is not currently conducting preclinical or clinical studies on Helicore.

      The Company has also developed BCTP, a lipid emulsion that acts on various microbials, including enveloped viruses, as well as sporesother therapeutics than commercially available phospholipid liposomes and bacteria. The product has also demonstrated spermicidal action. The Company believes that the emulsion acts on the target by first fusing or merging with the lipid envelope or outer membrane of the target. The Company believes that BCTP has many potential applications. Preclinical studies indicate that viruses and spores vulnerable to BCTP include influenza A and bacillus anthracis, but itother delivery vehicles. Our technologies may also be appropriatepreferred over other available transdermal delivery systems because they are easy to use, provide rapid onset of therapy and may reduce side effects such as skin irritation. In addition, future applications of our transdermal delivery systems may show advantages over injectable delivery technologies, which are invasive, inconvenient and sometimes painful.

Micellar Nanoparticle Emulsions.Micellar nanoparticle emulsions are proprietary, submicron-sized, water miscible, lipid structures derived from amphiphilic molecules. We believe that our micellar nanoparticle emulsions are the first substances able to encapsulate alcohol soluble materials for herpes, measles, mumps, rubelladelivery through the skin. The micellar nanoparticle emulsion formulations we use for the transdermal delivery of drugs have properties similar to creams and manylotions. Micellar nanoparticle emulsions are the fundamental technology platform for our hormone replacement therapies, including our ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB product candidates. We believe that our patent on this technology lasts until 2015.

Novasome Non-Phospholipid Vesicles.In addition to our micellar nanoparticle emulsion technology, we have developed Novasome non-phospholipid liposomes. Novasomes are proprietary liposomes in which drugs or other microbes and pathogens. While influenza vaccinesmaterials can be encapsulated for delivery into the body orally or by injection. They are relatively effective at preventing the flu, BCTP unlike vaccines, does not appear to promote mutation and resistance. Other advantagesmade using our patented manufacturing processes from a variety of BCTP appear to include a low toxicity profile, inexpensive scale-up and manufacturing costs, and a rapid and broad spectrum of killing.

Vaccine Adjuvants

      Adjuvants are substancesreadily available chemicals called amphiphiles. We believe that make vaccines more effective. The Company believes that itsour Novasome lipid vesiclestechnology may provide effective and safe adjuvant carrier systems for a variety of vaccines. Our initial use of this technology will be in the development of vaccines in a variety of circumstances, including: (i) encapsulation and protection from destruction by the body’s normal enzymatic processes of delicate antigenic materials; (ii) encapsulation of toxic materials, such as endotoxinsfor smallpox and other potent toxins,infectious diseases.

Virus-Like Particles.We also develop recombinant virus-like particles for gradual release, thereby providing protectionuse as vaccines against infectious diseases. Virus-like particles are self assembling protein structures which resemble viruses. These are non-infectious particles which can generate immune responses when administered as vaccines. We have several ongoing development programs involving virus-like particles, including human papillomavirus vaccines, melanoma vaccines, malaria vaccines, influenza vaccines and anti-stroke therapeutics.

Sterisomes.Sterisomes are our proprietary drug delivery system comprised of the body from the toxin while generating an immune80% water, 15% drug and 5% lipid. Sterisomes can be used as a depot delivery system for certain steroidal hormones. We currently have

8


response to the toxic antigen; and (iii) presentationin preclinical development a long-acting subcutaneous injectable formulation of small peptide antigens or proteins to elicit both heightened antibody and cellular immune responses.

Vaccine Projects

      The Company’s BSD operation currently has two products in clinical trials with collaborators at NIH. The first, an HPV-16 VLP vaccine is in Phase II clinical trials and is intended to prevent HPV-16 infection. The second product, a Hepatitis E vaccine, willtestosterone utilizing this delivery system. Initial animal studies suggest that therapeutic levels of testosterone can be tested in a Phase II trial in Nepal.

      In October 2000, BSD became a part of a team assembled by Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”)maintained for a contract awarded to SAIC for “Malaria Vaccine Production and Support Services”, funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) of the NIH. Under the terms of the agreement, we will work closely with SAIC to evaluate the process of developing malaria protein vaccine candidates using multiple expression systems, as well as bacterial and viral vectors. We will also be responsible for process development and GMP manufacturing and testing of the vaccine candidates. The seven-year subcontract commenced on or about January 1, 2001 and is estimated to be valued at $10.5 million.

      In October 2000, we extended our initial 1999 contract with the NCI, to manufacture recombinant monomeric and chimeric VLP’s against HPV. The novel recombinant VLP’s are non-infectious vaccine candidates designed to either treat or prevent HPV infections that cause genital warts and cervical cancer. The current contract value is approximately $2.0 million. The HPV vaccines were developed by research and development teams lead by Robin Robinson, Ph.D., Associate Director of BSD and Douglas Lowy, M.D. of the Laboratory of Cellular Oncology at NCI. Dr. Robinson will serve as Principal Investigator on this new HPV vaccine project. In January 2001, we also granted King an exclusive license to use our proprietary cell line to develop and potentially commercialize recombinant HPV vaccines. Novavax and King are currently working together on manufacturing HPV-16 VLP vaccines for an NCI Phase II study, expected to commence during the second half of 2001 in Costa Rica.

      The BSD operations also has a contract with NIH for the “Operation of an Experimental Virus Vaccine Production Facility” through November 2002. Current efforts are stressing dengue and parainfluenza virus reassortant vaccines.several weeks.

Manufacturing

      The development and manufacture of the Company’sour products are subject to good laboratory practices (“GLP”) and cGMP requirementsgood manufacturing practices prescribed by the FDA and to other standards prescribed by the appropriate regulatory agencyagencies in the country of use. The Company hasother countries. We currently utilize third party contract manufacturers to manufacture our existing product line, but we do have the ability to produce limited quantities of Novasome lipid vesicles and MNPs sufficientproducts needed to support its needs for early-stageour current research and development program and clinical trials. It does not presently have FDA-certified facilities capableWe currently manufacture ESTRASORB in 100 liter-size vessels at a pilot facility owned by Packaging Coordinators, Inc., a division of producingCardinal Health, Inc. We recently entered into an agreement with Packaging Coordinators to lease a 20,000 square foot facility at this same location and are in the larger quantitiesprocess of pharmaceutical products required for larger scalebuilding out the facility to our requirements and installing manufacturing equipment to accommodate larger-scale clinical trials orand commercial production. The Companyproduction of ESTRASORB. This manufacturing facility may also provide us with sufficient capacity for the commercial production of other new products. Products at this facility will be manufactured using our machinery and employees. Packaging Coordinators will perform the final fill and packaging of these products on a dedicated line and we are in the process of selecting a third party logistics company to distribute the products. In addition, we have entered into an agreement with Parkedale Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of King, which allows us to use manufacturing facilities at Parkedale to manufacture HPV16 vaccines for Phase III clinical trials. Despite the addition of these new facilities, we may also need to rely on collaborators, licensees or contract manufacturers or acquire suchdirect access to other manufacturing facilities for later stagefuture later-stage clinical trials and commercial production of its own pharmaceuticals. Novavax has entered into a supply agreement with PCI, Inc., a division of Cardinal Health, Inc., to produce ESTRASORB. This GMP facility, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has the capacity to meet Novavax’s current and future production requirements for ESTRASORB. Additionally, Novavax has entered into an agreement with Parkedale, Inc. a subsidiary of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., whereby Novavax can use manufacturing facilities at Parkedale to manufacture vaccines for Phase III clinical trials.efforts. There can be no assurance that the Companywe will be able to enter into such relationships or obtain suchneeded facilities orto manufacture such products in a timely fashionmanner at acceptable quality and prices, or that itwe or itsour suppliers will be able to comply with GLPgood laboratory practices or GMP,good manufacturing practices, as applicable, or that it or its suppliers will be able to manufacture an adequate supply of product.

MarketingCompetition

      The Company plans to market its current healthcarespecialty pharmaceutical industry is intensely competitive and is characterized by rapid technological progress. We compete with specialized biopharmaceutical firms and large pharmaceutical companies, in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, that are engaged in the discovery, development and marketing of hormone replacement therapies, vaccine products and pharmaceuticalother products that do or could compete with our currently marketed products and our product candidates. These companies, as well as academic institutions, governmental agencies and private research organizations, also compete with us in recruiting and retaining highly qualified scientific personnel and consultants.

      Many large companies currently produce and sell estrogen products for clinical indications identical to those that we seek for ESTRASORB. In the oral product segment of the estrogen replacement therapy market, which it obtains regulatory approvalsaccounts for approximately 78% of the market, the Wyeth-Ayerst division of American Home Products Corporation commits significant resources to the sale and marketing of its product, Premarin®, in order to maintain its market leadership position. Warner-Chillcot also competes in the future either throughbranded oral product segment with its recently acquired marketingproduct, Estrace®. ESTRASORB, if approved, will also compete with products produced and distribution operationssold by generic manufacturers in St. Louis, Missouri, joint ventures or corporate partnering arrangements. The Company expects thatthe oral product segment of the market, such arrangements could include technology licenses, research funding, milestone payments, collaborativeas Watson Pharmaceutical, Inc., with its generic product, development, royaltiesEstropipate®, and equity investments in Novavax. We expectApothecon, Inc., with its generic product, Estradiol.

      In the leveltransdermal patch segment of advertisingthe estrogen replacement therapy market, which accounts for approximately 14% of the market, several companies sell transdermal estrogen patches with which ESTRASORB will compete, if approved. For example, Novartis Pharma AG currently markets and promotional spending to supportsells its Vivelle® and Estraderm® transdermal products and Berlex Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Laboratories, Inc. co-promote the Climara® transdermal patch.

9


these

      Several companies currently market estrogen gels, which deliver estrogen transdermally, outside the U.S. We are also aware of at least one U.S. company with a gel-based estrogen replacement product in clinical trials.

      Our currently marketed products to be in line with industry standards.also face significant competition. The success of our strategy will depend on many factors including generalprenatal vitamin market, conditions, marketplace acceptance of the products, financial resources available to us and the influence of competition.

Competition

      All of the markets in which Novavax competes are intensely competitive. The pre-natal vitamin marketfor example, is very fragmented with many competitors. A number of companies that are larger than us, and have greater resources than we do, sell prenatal vitamins that compete in the market,with Nestabs, including Warner-Chillcot, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Mead Johnson and many generic and controlled brand manufacturers. The competition to develop FDA approvednew FDA-approved prenatal vitamins is intense and no assurance can be given that our product candidates will continue to be commercially successful products.

      Many large companies, such as American Home Products (“AHP”), Apothecon, Watson Pharmaceutical, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, and a number of generic manufacturers currently produce and sell estrogen products for clinical indications identical to those the Company seeks for its lead product.also intense. In addition, Gynodiol, our oral estrogen replacement therapy product, competes with the Wyeth-Ayerst division of AHP commits significant resources in the sales and marketing of itsestrogen replacement therapy products to maintain its market leadership position. In the transdermal segment of the market, Novartis markets a transdermal estrogen patch and Watson currently markets a transdermal testosterone patch.described above.

      A number of other companies including Merck, Glaxo-SmithKline, Novartis, Pharmacia, and AHP have been working on vaccines and vaccine adjuvants for use as human drug products. TheIn general, competition to develop FDA-approved human vaccines and vaccine adjuvants is intense and no assurance can be given that our vaccine and vaccine adjuvant product candidates will be developed into commercially successful products.

      Primary competitors in the development of lipid structure and vesicle encapsulation technologies are Elan, Alza, Gilead and L’Oreal, as well as otheramong pharmaceutical vaccine and chemical companies. We believe that, except for L’Oreal, these companies have focused their development efforts on pharmaceutical carrier systems for the treatment of infections and certain cancers. To our knowledge, Elan, Alza and Gilead all base their lipid vesicle technologies on phospholipids.

      Most of our competitors are larger than we are and have substantially greater financial, marketing and technical resources. In addition, many of these competitors have substantially greater experience than we have in developing, testing and obtaining FDA and other approvals of pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, when we commence commercial sales of pharmaceuticals, we will also be competing with respect to manufacturing efficiency and marketing capabilities, areas in which we have limited or no experience. If any of the competitors develop new encapsulation technologies that are superior to our Novasome and MNP technologies, our ability to expand into the pharmaceutical and vaccine adjuvant markets will be materially and adversely affected.

      Competition among products will be based among other things,in part on product efficacy, safety, reliability, availability, price and patent position. An important factor will be the relative timing of market introduction of our products and our competitors’ products. Accordingly, the relative speed with which we can develop products, complete the clinical trials and approval processes and supply commercial quantities of the products to the market, is expected to be an important competitive factor. Our competitive position will also depend upon our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, to obtain patent protection or otherwise develop proprietary products or processes and to secure sufficient capital resources for the often substantial period between technological conception and commercial sales.sale.

Research and Development

      Our research is focused principally on the development and commercialization of formulations for topical drug delivery and therapeutic products, including anti-bacterial and anti-viral products and adjuvants for vaccines. We intend to use third party funding when available, through collaborations, joint ventures or strategic alliances with other companies. Because of the substantial funds required for clinical trials, we may have to obtain additional financing for our future human clinical trials. No assurance can be given that such financing will be available on terms attractive to us, if at all.

      We base our development decisions on costs and potential return on investment, regulatory considerations, and the interest, sponsorship and availability of funding from third parties. As of December 31, 2000, our research and

10


development staff numbered 31 individuals. In addition to its internal research and development efforts, we encourage the development of product candidates in areas related to our present lines by working with universities and government agencies. Our research and development expenditures approximated $9.4 million, $3.4 million and $3.4 million in the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

Patents and Proprietary Information

      Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we hold 50We currently have 54 U.S. patents and have approximately 125150 foreign patents and patent applications covering our technologies (which include a wide variety of component materials, its continuous flow vesicle production process and its Novamix® production equipment).technologies. We believe that these patents are important for the protection of our technology as well as certain of the development processes that underlie that technology. In addition,have three pending U.S. patent applications are pending covering the composition, manufacture and use of itsour organized lipid structures and related technologies. We recently filed 15 new patent applications directed towards innovative discoveries made in the field of human vaccines.

      We expect to engageA current U.S. patent issued in collaborations, sponsored research agreements1997 covers our micellar nanoparticle technology and preclinical testing agreements in connection with our future pharmaceutical products and vaccine adjuvants, as well as clinical testing agreements with academic and research institutions and U.S. government agencies, such asmethods of their production. Micellar nanoparticles are the NIH, to take advantagestructures which allow for ESTRASORB’s unique transdermal delivery of the technical expertise and staff of these institutions and to gain access to clinical evaluation models, patients and related technologies. Consistent with pharmaceutical industry and academic standards, and the rules and regulations promulgated under the federalestradiol.

      The Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 these agreementsis designed to encourage the dissemination of science and technology innovation and provide sharing of technology that has commercial potential. Consistent with statutory guidelines issued under the Act, the Company’s collaborative research efforts with the government or with other private entities receiving federal funding may provide that developments and results will be freely published, that information or materials supplied by us will not be treated as confidential and that we will be required to negotiate a license to any such developments and results in order to commercialize products. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully obtain any such license at a reasonable cost or that such developments and results will not be made available to our competitors on an exclusive or nonexclusive basis.

Government Regulation

      Our research and development activities are subject to regulation for safety, efficacy and quality by numerous governmental authorities in the United States and other countries. TheIn the United States, the development, manufacturing and marketing of human pharmaceuticals are subject to regulation in the United States for safety and efficacy by the FDA in accordance with the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

      In the United States, human pharmaceuticals are subject to rigorous FDA regulation including preclinical and clinical testing. The process of completing clinical trials and obtaining FDA approvals for a new drug is likely to take a number of years, requires the expenditure of substantial resources and is often subject to unanticipated delays. There can be no assurance that any product will receive such approval on a timely basis, if at all.

      The steps required before new products for use in humans may be marketed in the United States include (i) preclinical tests, (ii) submission to the FDA of an IND,Investigational New Drug application, which must be approved before human clinical trials commence, (iii) adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the product, (iv) submission of an NDAa New Drug Application for a new drug or a Product License Application (“PLA”) for a new biologic to the FDA and (v) FDA approval of the NDANew Drug Application or PLAProduct License Application prior to any commercial sale or shipment of the product.

Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluation of product formulation as well asand animal studies (if an appropriate animal model is available) to assess the potential safety and efficacy of the product. Formulations must be

10


manufactured according to GMPgood manufacturing practices and preclinical safety tests must be conducted by laboratories that comply with FDA regulations regarding GLP.good laboratory practices.

      The results of the preclinical tests are submitted to the FDA as part of an INDInvestigational New Drug application and are reviewed by the FDA prior to the commencement of human clinical trials. There can be no assurance that submission of an INDInvestigational New Drug application will result in FDA authorization to commence clinical trials. Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to healthy volunteers and to patients under the supervision of a qualified principal investigator and are typically conducted in three sequential phases, although the phases may overlap. We or the FDA may suspend clinical trials at any time if the participants are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. The FDA may deny an NDAa New Drug Application or PLAProduct License Application if applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied, may require additional testing or information, or may require post marketingpost-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety of ourthe applicable products.

11


      In addition to obtaining FDA approval for each PLA,Product License Application, an Establishment License Application (“ELA”) must be filed and approved by the FDA for the manufacturing facilities of a biologic product before commercial marketing of the biologic product is permitted. TheThis regulatory process may take many years and requires the expenditure of substantial resources.

      In addition to regulations enforced by the FDA, we are also subject to regulation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Environmental Protection Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and other present and potential future federal, state or local regulations. Our research and development involves the controlled use of hazardous materials, chemicals and viruses. Although we believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of such materials comply with the standards prescribed by state and federal regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of such an accident, we could be held liable for any damages that result, and any such liability could exceed our resources.

      In both domestic and foreign markets, our ability to commercialize our product candidates will depend, in part, on the availability of reimbursement from third-party payers, such as government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. If adequate coverage and reimbursement levels are not provided by government, and third-party payers for uses of our therapeutic products, the market acceptance of these products would be adversely affected.

There have been a number of federal and state proposals during the last few years to subject the pricing of pharmaceuticals to government control and to make other changes to the medical care system of the United States. It is uncertain what legislative proposals will be adopted or what actions federal, state or private payerspayors for medical goods and services may take in response to any medical reform proposals or legislation. We cannot predict the effect medical reforms may have on our business, and no assurance can be given that any such reforms will not have a material adverse effect.

Employees

      The Company had 127We currently have 173 full-time employees, as of December 31, 2000, of whom 3138 are in research and development. Of those 31, 6 are PhD’s38 employees in research and 1development, eight have earned PhD degrees and one is an M.D. The Company hasa medical doctor. We have no collective bargaining agreement with itsour employees and believesbelieve that itsour employee relations are good.

Risks and Uncertainties

     The following is a summary description of some of the many risks we face in our business. You should carefully review these risksread the following risk factors in evaluating our business. Some of the following risks relate principally to our business includingand the businessindustry in which we operate. Other risks relate principally to the securities market and ownership of our subsidiaries.common stock. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could be adversely affected. You should also consider the other information described in this report.

Our success is heavily dependent on FDA approval and market acceptance of ESTRASORB

      Our New Drug Application for ESTRASORB was accepted for filing by the FDA in August 2001. There is no guarantee that the FDA will approve our application and allow us to begin selling ESTRASORB in the United States. If we do not receive FDA approval of our application, our inability to sell ESTRASORB in the United States would have a significant negative effect on our business and results of operations. Even if ESTRASORB is approved by the FDA, there is no guarantee that we and King our marketing partner for ESTRASORB, will be able to successfully commercialize ESTRASORB. Many factors could negatively affect our ability to successfully commercialize ESTRASORB, including:

• a failure or delay in ESTRASORB gaining a meaningful share of the estrogen replacement therapy market, which currently is dominated by Premarin®, an oral estrogen tablet, sold by a division of

11


American Home Products Corporation, and estrogen patches sold by several companies including Novartis Pharma AG, Berlex Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;
• our inability to effectively promote and sell ESTRASORB with King in the United States, or King’s inability to do so in the rest of the world;
• delays in the manufacture of ESTRASORB in commercial quantities; and
• the inability to obtain coverage and favorable reimbursement rates for ESTRASORB from insurers and other third party payors.

We will face substantial competition in connection with the sale of ESTRASORB and our other product candidates

      We compete with numerous other companies worldwide that have developed or are developing products that compete or may compete with our product candidates. These competitors include both large and small pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology firms, universities and other research institutions. We may not succeed in developing technologies and products that are more effective than those being developed by our competitors.

      Many large companies currently produce and sell estrogen products for clinical indications identical to those that we seek for ESTRASORB. In the oral product segment of the estrogen replacement therapy market, which accounts for approximately 78% of the market, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, a division of American Home Products Corporation, commits significant resources to the sale and marketing of its product, Premarin®, in order to maintain its market leadership position. Warner-Chillcot also competes in the branded oral product segment with its product, Estrace®. In addition, ESTRASORB will also compete with products produced and sold by generic manufacturers in the oral product segment of the market, such as Watson Pharmaceutical, Inc., with its generic product, Estropipate®, and Apothecon, Inc., with its generic product, Estradiol. In the patch segment of the market, which accounts for approximately 14% of the estrogen replacement therapy market, several companies market transdermal estrogen patches with which ESTRASORB will compete, if approved. For example, Novartis Pharma AG currently markets and sells its Vivelle® and Estraderm® patches and Berlex Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc. co-promote the Climara® transdermal patch. Several companies also currently market alcohol-based estrogen gels and ointments outside the United States. For example, Schering Canada sells its estrogen gel, Estrogel®, in Canada. These and other products sold by our competitors have all been approved for sale and have achieved some degree of market penetration. If ESTRASORB is approved for sale in the Untied States, it will compete for market share with these products and we cannot guarantee that together with King, we will be able to effectively promote ESTRASORB against these competitive products. In order to effectively compete, we may make substantial investments in sales and marketing. Many of these products are sold by companies with greater resources than we have and there is no assurance that we will be successful in gaining significant market share for ESTRASORB or in earning a return on that investment.

      Our technologies and products may be rendered obsolete or noncompetitive as a result of products introduced by competitors. Most of our competitors have substantially greater financial and technical resources, production and marketing capabilities, and related experience than us. The greater resources, capabilities and experience of our competitors may enable them to develop, manufacture and market their products more successfully and at a lower cost than we can. In addition, many of our competitors have significantly greater experience than us in conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials of human pharmaceuticals and obtaining regulatory approvals to market such products. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining FDA approval for products more rapidly than us which may give them an advantage over us in achieving market acceptance of their products.

We may need additional capital to grow and operate our business and we are uncertain about obtaining future financing

12


      We estimate that our existing cash resources will be sufficient to finance our operations at current and projected levels of development and general corporate activity for the next 12 to 15 months. We cannot be certain that we will be able to generate sufficient revenues from product sales in the near term or at all. We may require additional funds to continue our research and development, commence future preclinical and clinical trials, seek regulatory approvals, establish commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities and market our products. We may seek additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings, collaborative arrangements with pharmaceutical companies and other sources. We cannot be certain that adequate additional funding or bank financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we cannot raise the additional funds we may need to continue our current and anticipated operations, we may be required to delay significantly, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs. If that is the case we will seek other alternatives to avoid insolvency, including arrangements with collaborative partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies, product candidates or products.

  We have a history of losses and our future profitability is uncertain

      Our expenses have exceeded our revenues since our formation in 1987, and our accumulated deficit at December 31, 20002001 was $55.1$64.8 million. Our revenues for the last three years were, $681,000 in 1998, $1.2 million in 1999, and $2.5 million in 2000. The Fielding acquisition will generate revenue from commercial sales2000 and $24.0 million in 2001. Sales of products that we acquired as a result of our acquisition of Fielding Pharmaceutical Company have generated modest revenues, but we cannot be certain thatbased on our current business plan these revenues will not be sufficient to offset our expenses in the future. We cannot be certain of when or if we will generate substantial revenues from the sale of ESTRASORB. We have received a very limited amount of product-related revenue from research contracts, licenses and agreements to provide vaccine products, services and adjuvant technologies. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in entering into strategic alliances or collaborative arrangements with other companies that will result in other significant revenues to offset our expenses. Our net losses for the last three years were $4.8 million in 1998, $4.5 million in 1999, and $12.2 million in 2000.2000 and $9.7 million in 2001. Our losses have resulted from research and development expenses, clinical trials, protection of our patents and other intellectual property and other general operating expenses. We expect that our annual losses will continueincrease in the near term as we expand our manufacturing capacity, sales and marketing capabilities and conduct additional and larger clinical trials and seek regulatory approval for advanced stageother product candidates. Therefore, we expect our cumulative operating loss to increase until such time, if ever, as product sales, licensing fees and royalty payments generate sufficient revenue to fund our continuing operations. We cannot predict when, if ever, we might achieve profitability and cannot be certain that we will be able to sustain profitability, if achieved.

12      We intend to allocate a significant portion of our sales personnel’s time to the product launch of ESTRASORB, if and when it is approved by the FDA. Accordingly, the sales of our other women’s health products could be adversely affected by the efforts we allocate to the ESTRASORB product launch. The costs of maintaining our own sales force to market our current products and ESTRASORB, if approved, may in the future exceed product revenues. If we continue to market ESTRASORB or future products directly, significant additional expenditures and management resources may be required to increase the size of our internal sales force.

Our sales and marketing plan for ESTRASORB depends in large part on the success of our relationship with King

      We have entered into a co-promotion agreement with King for the marketing and promotion of ESTRASORB in the United States using our sales and marketing personnel and King’s sales and marketing personnel. We have also granted King exclusive rights to promote, market and distribute ESTRASORB outside the United States. In return, we received certain milestone payments, potential future milestone payments, licensing fees and royalties on future sales. While our agreements with King give us some limited protections with respect to King’s marketing and sales efforts and, we believe, creates financial incentives for King consistent with our own, we cannot control the amount and timing of marketing efforts that King devotes to ESTRASORB or make any assurances that our and King’s co-promotion of ESTRASORB in the United States and King’s marketing of ESTRASORB in the rest of the world will be successful.

13


      Our success in marketing other potential future products will also depend in large part on our relationship with King. Our co-promotion agreement with King also provides for co-promotion in the United States with King of our product candidate ANDROSORB™ and our human papillomavirus vaccine, if any of these products are approved for marketing by the FDA, and gives King an exclusive worldwide license, except in the United States, to market these future products. Under our co-promotion agreement, King has the right to co-promote future hormone replacement therapy products in the field of women’s health. If King exercises this right with respect to a particular product candidate, King is obligated to share equally with us in the development costs of such product. In the future, we might enter into other licensing or co-promotion arrangements with King or other third parties for the marketing and sale of other future products. Any revenues we receive from sales of ANDROSORB™ and other future products will depend in large part on the terms of these agreements and the efforts of King and any other third-party marketing partners.

Our agreements with King may reduce the likelihood that we could be acquired by another company

      Our co-promotion agreement and license agreement with King for the marketing of ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB contain several provisions which would take effect upon a change of control of Novavax. One provision allows King several options in the event of a change in control of Novavax including (i) terminating our right to co-promote King products, (ii) terminating our rights to promote ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB and any other hormone therapies for women for which King is paying 50% of the development costs or (iii) requiring us to assign and transfer to King all related rights of ownership for ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB and any such other hormone replacement therapies for women and license to King on an exclusive and perpetual basis all related intellectual property rights and know how. If King chooses to exercise its rights under either clause (ii) or (iii) above, King will pay us royalties on net sales of the products. In addition, King will pay us for the cost of manufacturing, plus a markup consistent with the terms of the license agreement for the handling costs. King could also require that we redeem the outstanding promissory notes, currently in the amount of $30.0 million, at 101% of the outstanding principal and accrued interest. These provisions may have the effect of making us less attractive as an acquisition candidate.

We need additional manufacturing capability to commercialize our products

      We do not have any experience with the large capacity manufacturing required for commercial sale of a product. Although we have had the ability to produce the limited quantities of products needed to support our current research and development program and clinical trials, we will need more production capacity for larger, later-stage clinical studies and commercial sales. Our potential products may be too difficult or costly to manufacture on a large scale, to develop into commercially viable products or to market.

      We are in the process of validating our manufacturing methods for ESTRASORB, which is required under FDA guidelines, and are awaiting FDA approval of these methods. We currently manufacture ESTRASORB at a facility of Packaging Coordinators, Inc., a subsidiary of Cardinal Health, Inc. We recently entered into an agreement with Packaging Coordinators to lease 20,000 square feet of space within their facility. Under the terms of this agreement, Packaging Coordinators will provide packaging services for the product we manufacture in their facility. We are in the process of building out the facility to meet our requirements and installing manufacturing equipment at this facility with the capacity required for commercial production of ESTRASORB. Once this new equipment is installed, we will need to confirm that the ESTRASORB made using this new equipment is identical to that used in our clinical trials. If we are unable to make ESTRASORB on a commercial scale or are delayed in validating the product manufactured with our new equipment, the commercialization of ESTRASORB would be delayed.

      In the near term, we will be manufacturing ESTRASORB only in the Packaging Coordinators facility. If ESTRASORB is approved by the FDA, we plan to qualify at least one additional site for the manufacture of ESTRASORB. If we are unable to utilize the Packaging Coordinators facility to manufacture ESTRASORB prior to our qualification of a second site, however, we would not have immediate access to ESTRASORB and would be required to reestablish our validation process at a different facility which would cause us to lose sales of ESTRASORB and would adversely affect our business.

14


      We currently utilize third party contract manufacturers to manufacture our other products. Any contract manufacturer’s facility that we may use, including the Packaging Coordinators facility, must adhere to the FDA’s regulations on current good manufacturing practices, which are enforced by the FDA through its facilities inspection program. These facilities are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA. The manufacture of products at these facilities will be subject to strict quality control testing and recordkeeping requirements. We may not be able to enter into alternative manufacturing arrangements at commercially acceptable rates, if at all. Moreover, the manufacturers utilized by us may not provide quantities of product sufficient to meet our specifications or our delivery, cost and other requirements.

      If we decide to manufacture our own products, we will need to acquire additional manufacturing facilities and to improve our manufacturing technology. Establishing additional manufacturing facilities will require us to spend substantial funds, hire and retain a significant number of additional personnel and comply with extensive regulations applicable to such facilities here and abroad, including the current good laboratory practices and good manufacturing practices required by the FDA. If we elect to or need to manufacture our own products, we risk the possibility that we may not be able to do so in a timely fashion at acceptable quality and prices or in compliance with good laboratory practices and good manufacturing practices.

  We have not completed the development of any product and our ability to do so is uncertain

      Allmany of our potential products are still in various stages of pre-clinical research or clinical trials. Significant further research and development, pre-clinical and clinical testing, regulatory approval and additional financing are all necessary before the commercial sales of any of our products.

      We are not certain whether we will be able to complete the development of and sell any of our products. The development of pharmaceutical products based on new technologies is subject to a variety of inherent risks of failure. These risks include the following:

• Our potential products may be found to be unsafe, to have harmful side effects on humans, to be ineffective or may otherwise fail to meet regulatory standards or receive necessary regulatory approvals.
• Our potential products may be too difficult or costly to manufacture on a large scale, to develop into commercially viable products or to market.
• Our potential products may not be accepted by the medical community.
• Other companies may market superior or equivalent products.
• Other parties may claim proprietary rights to our product technology that prevent us from marketing our products.
• We may be unable to raise enough money to finance our continued product development.

      We have recently completed a Phase III clinical trial for our estrogen replacement therapy product, ESTRASORB and expect to file an NDA in the first half of 2001. Our products are in various phases of testing and we cannot guarantee that these products will successfully pass such testing phases, and if so, will result in commercially successful products. Clinical trial results are frequently susceptible to varying interpretations by scientists, medical personnel, regulatory personnel, statisticians and others which may delay, limit or prevent further clinical development or regulatory approvals of a product candidate. Also, the length of time that it takes for us to complete clinical trials and obtain regulatory approval for product marketing can vary by product and by the indicated use of a product. We are unable to predict the length of time before we complete the necessary clinical trials and obtain regulatory approval.

We may not succeed in obtaining the FDA approval necessary to sell ourany additional products

      The development, manufacture and marketing of our pharmaceutical products are subject to government regulation in the United States and other countries. In the United States and most foreign countries, we must complete rigorous preclinical testing and extensive human clinical trials that demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a product in order to apply for regulatory approval to market the product. OneOnly a few of our products have been approved for sale and our application to sell ESTRASORB in the United States is currently being reviewed by the FDA. Two of our product candidates, ANDROSORB isand our human papillomavirus virus-like particle vaccine, are now in Phase III human clinical studies. ESTRASORB recently completedIn addition, Phase IIII clinical trials for estrogen replacement therapy.our Hepatitis E vaccine are currently being conducted. Our other product candidates are in pre-clinicalpreclinical laboratory or animal studies. Before applying for FDA approval to market any particularadditional product candidate,candidates, we must conduct larger-scale Phase II and III human clinical trials that demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our products to the satisfaction of the FDA or other regulatory authorities. These processes are expensive and can take many years to complete. We may not be able to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our products to the satisfaction of the FDA or other regulatory authorities. NovavaxWe may also be required to demonstrate that itsour proposed product representsproducts represent an improved form of treatment over existing therapies and we may be unable to do so without conducting further clinical studies, if at all.studies.

      We may fail to obtain regulatory approval for our products on a timely basis, if at all.basis. Delays in obtaining regulatory approval can be extremely costly in terms of lost sales opportunities and increased clinical trial costs. The speed with which we complete our clinical trials and our applications for marketing approval will depend on several factors, including the following:

 • Thethe rate of patient enrollment, which is a function of many factors, including the size of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the study and the nature of the protocol;

13


 • Institutionalinstitutional review board approval of the protocol and the informed consent form;
 
 • Priorprior regulatory agency review and approval;
 
 • Analysisanalysis of data obtained from pre-clinicalpreclinical and clinical activities which are susceptible to varying interpretations, which interpretations could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval;
 
 • Changeschanges in the policies of regulatory authorities for drug approval during the period of product development; and
 
 • Thethe availability of skilled and experienced staff to conduct and monitor clinical studies and to prepare the appropriate regulatory applications.

15


      We have limited experience in conducting and managing the pre-clinicalpreclinical and clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory marketing approvals. We may not be able to obtain the approvals necessary to conduct clinical studies. Also, the results of our clinical trials may not be consistent with the results obtained in pre-clinicalpreclinical studies or the results obtained in later phases of clinical trials may not be consistent with those obtained in earlier phases. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after experiencing promising results in early animal and human testing. If regulatory approval of a drug is granted, such approval is likely to limit the indicated uses for which it may be marketed. Furthermore, even if a product of ours gains regulatory approval, the product and the manufacturer of the product will be subject to continuing regulatory review. We may be restricted or prohibited from marketing or manufacturing a product, even after obtaining product approval, if previously unknown problems with the product or its manufacture are subsequently discovered.

  We may need substantial additional capital to grow and operate our business and we are uncertain about obtaining future financing

      We estimate that our existing cash resources will be sufficient to finance our operations at current and projected levels of development and general corporate activity for the next 12 to 18 months. Thereafter, we will require substantial additional funds to continue our research and development, commence future pre-clinical and clinical trials, seek regulatory approvals, establish commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities and market our products. We will seek to obtain additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings, collaborative arrangements with pharmaceutical companies and other sources. We cannot be certain that adequate additional funding or bank financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we cannot raise the additional funds and we need to continue our current and anticipated operations, we may be required to delay significantly, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs. If that is the case we will seek other alternatives to avoid insolvency, including arrangements with collaborative partners or others that may require Novavax to relinquish rights to certain of its technologies, product candidates or products.

Our success depends on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technology

      Our success will, in large part, depend on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technology and other trade secrets. To do so, we must prosecute and maintain existing patents, obtain new patents and pursue trade secret protection. We also must operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties or letting third parties infringe our rights. Novavax has 50 United StatesWe currently have 54 U.S. patents and approximately 125150 foreign patents and patent applications covering its technologies, including its Novamix™ production equipment.our technologies. We have three pending U.S. patent applications covering the composition, manufacture and use of our organized lipid structures and related technologies. We recently filed 15 new patent applications directed towards innovative discoveries made in the field of human papillomavirus. However, patent issues relating to pharmaceuticals involve complex legal, scientific and factual questions. To date, no consistent policy has emerged regarding the breadth of biotechnology patent claims that are granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office or enforced by the federal court.courts. Therefore, we do not know whether our applications will result in the issuance of patents, or that any patents issued to Novavaxus will provide us with any competitive advantage. We also cannot be sure that Novavaxwe will develop additional proprietary products that are patentable. Furthermore, there is a risk that others will independently develop or duplicate similar technology or products or circumvent the patents issued to Novavax.us.

      There is a risk that third parties may challenge our existing patents or may claim that we are infringing their patents or proprietary rights. We could incur substantial costs in defending patent infringement suitessuits or in filing

14


suits against others to have their patents declared invalid or claim infringement. It is also possible that we may be required to obtain licenses from third parties to avoid infringing third-party patents or other proprietary rights. We cannot be sure that such third-party licenses would be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain required third-party licenses, we may be delayed in or prohibited from developing, manufacturing or selling products requiring such licenses.

      Although our patents include claims covering various features of our product candidates, including composition, methods of manufacture and use, our patents do not provide us with complete protection against the development of competing products. For example, our patents do not prohibit third parties from developing and selling products for estrogen replacement therapy that deliver estrogen through a topical lotion, ointment or similar medium.

      Some of our know-how and technology is not patentable. To protect our proprietary rights in unpatentable intellectual property and trade secrets, we require employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements. These agreements may not provide meaningful protection for Novavax’sour trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use or disclosure.

  Other organizations have greater resources to develop, manufactureHealth care insurers and market competitiveother payors may not pay for our products or may impose limits on reimbursement

      We compete with numerous other companies worldwide that have developed or are developing novel drug deliveryOur ability to commercialize ESTRASORB and encapsulation technologies. These competitors include both large and small pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology firms, universitiesour future products will depend, in part, on the extent to which reimbursement for such products will be available from third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid, health maintenance organizations, health insurers and other research institutions. Novavax may notpublic and private payors. If we succeed in developing technologiesbringing ESTRASORB or other products in the future to market, we cannot assure you that third-party payors

16


will pay for ESTRASORB or will establish and maintain price levels sufficient for realization of an appropriate return on our investment in product development. For example, ESTRASORB, if approved for commercial sale in the United States, would be sold as an outpatient prescription drug. Medicare does not cover the costs of most outpatient prescription drugs. We expect that ESTRASORB will be treated the same as other estrogen replacement therapy products with respect to government and third-party payor reimbursement. However, we cannot assure you that are more effective than those being developed by our competitors. Novavax’s technologiesESTRASORB will receive similar reimbursement treatment.

      Many health maintenance organizations and products mayother third-party payors use formularies, or lists of drugs for which coverage is provided under a health care benefit plan, to control the costs of prescription drugs. Each payor that maintains a drug formulary makes its own determination as to whether a new drug will be rendered obsoleteadded to the formulary and whether particular drugs in a therapeutic class will have preferred status over other drugs in the same class. This determination often involves an assessment of the clinical appropriateness of the drug and sometimes the cost of the drug in comparison to alternative products. We cannot assure you that ESTRASORB or noncompetitive as a result of products introduced by competitors. Mostany of our competitorsfuture products will be added to payor’s formularies, whether our products will have substantially greater financial and technical resources, production capabilities and experience of our competitorspreferred status to alternative therapies, nor whether the formulary decisions will be conducted in a timely manner. We may enable themalso decide to develop, manufacture and market their products more successfully and at aenter into discount or formulary fee arrangements with payors, which could result in us receiving lower cost than Novavax. In addition, many of Novavax’s competitors have significantly greater experience than Novavax in conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials of human pharmaceuticals and obtaining regulatory approvals to market such products. Accordingly, Novavax’s competitors may succeed in obtaining FDA approvalor discounted prices for products more rapidly than Novavax which may give them an advantage over Novavax in achieving market acceptance of theirESTRASORB or future products.

  We need marketing and manufacturing partners to commercialize our productsmay have product liability exposure

      We do not have any significant manufacturing capability and our drug development capability is limitedThe administration of drugs to humans, whether in large part by our finances. Although we have the ability to produce the limited quantities of products needed to support our current research and development program and clinical trials we will need more production capacityor after marketing clearances are obtained, can result in product liability claims. We maintain product liability insurance coverage in the total amount of $9.0 million for larger, later-stage clinical studiesclaims arising from the use of our currently marketed products and commercial sales. Therefore, our ability to successfully develop and commercialize our products depends, in large part, on our success in entering into strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with collaborative partners, primarily pharmaceutical companies. We expect that these partners will assume various responsibilities for product commercialization including conducting clinical trials submitting applications for regulatory approvalprior to FDA. Coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, however, and manufacturing product supplies. However, we may not be able to negotiate collaborative arrangementsmaintain insurance at a reasonable cost. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our existing insurance coverage or obtain coverage for the use of our other products in the future. This insurance coverage and our resources may not be sufficient to satisfy liabilities resulting from product liability claims. A successful claim may prevent us from obtaining adequate product liability insurance in the future on acceptablecommercially desirable terms, if at all. Even if a claim is not successful, defending such collaborations are established, they may not be scientifically or commercially successful. There is a risk that our collaborative partners may fail to perform their obligations to develop and manufacture our products in which case our businessclaim may be adversely affected. We also face the risk thattime-consuming and expensive and may damage our collaborative partners may develop competing technologies for treating the diseases and conditions targeted by our products, either on their own or in collaboration with others.

      In certain circumstances, it may be advantageous for us to retain manufacturing rights for some of the products that we license to collaborative partners. However, we cannot be sure that we will be able to retain such rights on acceptable terms, if at all, or that we will have the ability to produce the quantities of product required under the terms of such arrangements. Our reliance on collaborative arrangements for product development and commercialization may result in lower revenues from royalties and other payments than we could have generated had we commercialized and marketed products ourselves.

      If we manufacture our own products, we will need to acquire additional manufacturing facilities and to improve our manufacturing technology. Establishing additional manufacturing facilities will require us to spend substantial funds, hire and retain a significant number of additional personnel and comply with extensive regulations applicable to such facilities here and abroad, including the current good laboratory practices and good manufacturing practices required by the FDA. If we elect to or need to manufacture our own products, we risk the possibility that we may not be able to do so in a timely fashion at acceptable quality and prices or in compliance with good laboratory

15


practices and good manufacturing practices. If we are not able to enter into commercial manufacturing agreements or successfully develop our own commercial manufacturing capacity, sales of our products will be delayed or reduced.

      We arereputation in the process of validating our manufacturing methods for ESTRASORB, which is required under FDA guidelines. We have entered into a supply agreement using one third-party contract manufacturer for our clinical and manufacturing needs. We intend to qualify at least one additional FDA approved manufacturing facility after receiving FDA approval. However, if we are unable to produce ESTRASORB in our current facility, Novavax would not have immediate access to this product. Under such circumstances Novavax would be required to reestablish its validation process at a different third-party contract manufacturer. This would delay the commercialization of ESTRASORB.marketplace.

  The Fielding acquisition may not result in a smooth integrationprice of our future products into Fielding’s current salescommon stock has been, and distribution channelsmay continue to be, volatile

      We cannot be certain whetherHistorically, the acquisition of Fielding will result in a successful integrationmarket price of our future products into Fielding’s salescommon stock has fluctuated over a wide range. In fiscal 2001, our common stock ranged from a low of $6.35 to a high of $15.55. It is likely that the price of our common stock will fluctuate in the future. The market prices of securities of small capitalization Specialty pharmaceutical companies, including ours, from time to time experience significant price and distribution channels. Amongvolume fluctuations unrelated to the reasons we have acquired Fielding are its experienced sales representatives and seasoned management team, its existing product revenues and operating income, which will provide Fielding withperformance of such companies. In particular, over the financial resourcesnext year, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly due to fund the developmenta variety of additional proprietary products, and the synergies which should be created by the merger. In the event that we are unable to integrate successfully, our results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected and we would continue to have limited revenues and large operating losses. factors, including:

• sales of our products, particularly ESTRASORB, if it is approved for sale; and
• governmental agency actions, including the FDA’s determination with respect to our pending New Drug Application for ESTRASORB.

In addition, our inability to integrate successfully would increase our dependence on other third party collaborations.

Our bylaws contain anti-takeover provisions that may deter an acquisitionthe occurrence of Novavax, a change of management or other events that might benefit stockholders

      Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation requires that any action required or permitted to be taken by stockholders of Novavax must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing, and will require reasonable advance notice by a stockholder of a proposal or director nomination which such stockholder desires to present at any annual or special meeting of stockholders. Special meetings of stockholders may be called only the Chief Executive Officer or, if none, the President of Novavax or the Board of Directors. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation also provided for a classified Board of Directors and members of the Board of Directors may be removed only for cause uponrisks described in this “Risks and Uncertainties” section could have a dramatic and adverse impact on the affirmative vote of holders of a least two-thirds of the shares of capital stock of Novavax entitled to vote. The Board of Directors also has the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to fix the rights and preferences of, and issue shares of, preferred stock.

      These provisions and other provisionsmarket price of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws may deter hostile takeovers or delay or prevent changes in control or management of Novavax, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. In addition, these provisions may limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they believe to be beneficial.common stock.

Item 2.  Properties

      The Company leasesWe lease approximately 12,000 square feet of administrative offices and laboratory space for itsour corporate headquarters and pharmaceutical product storage at 8320 Guilford Road,in Columbia, Maryland. The Company leases a secondWe lease two facilities in Rockville, Maryland. One facility ofis approximately 6,000 square feet of space located in Rockville, Maryland. This facilityand contains the Company’sour certified animal facility and laboratories for itsour drug research and biologics development, which includes theour vaccine adjuvant product and services group. A thirdIn the other facility leasesin Rockville, we lease approximately 12,000 square feet of space which is also located in Rockville, Maryland.space. This facility is for contract vaccine research, development and manufacturing of Phase I and II products. The Company’sOur Fielding subsidiary leases a facility in

17


Maryland Heights, Missouri. This facility is approximately 12,000 square feet and is used for administrative offices, manufacturing and warehousing.

16


In addition, in February 2002, we entered into a facilities reservation agreement through which we lease approximately 20,000 square feet of manufacturing space to meet our current and anticipated future production requirements for ESTRASORB. This facility is currently undergoing construction which is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2002. We also lease one smaller facility. A summary of our material leased facilities is set forth below.

PropertySquare FootagePurpose



Columbia, Maryland12,000Corporate headquarters
Rockville, Maryland6,000Research and development activities and office space
Rockville, Maryland12,000Research and development activities and office space
Maryland Heights, Missouri12,000Administrative, repackaging, warehousing and distribution
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania20,000Manufacturing and packaging of ESTRASORB

      The Company believes itsWe believe our facilities are adequate to produce quantitiesaccommodate our current business plan and anticipated short-term needs and that we will be able to lease additional comparable space, if necessary. However, if we choose to expand our manufacturing capacity, the lease or acquisition of, Novasome lipid vesicles, micellar nanoparticles, vaccines and adjuvantsthe receipt of required regulatory approvals for, additional pharmaceutical manufacturing space may be time-consuming and expensive. In addition, we might not be able to support Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. It does not presently have FDA certified facilities capable of producing the larger quantities of pharmaceutical products required for commercial production. The Company presently reliesobtain such additional manufacturing space on collaborators, licenseesa timely basis or contract manufacturers for Phase III clinical trial materials and commercial production of its own pharmaceuticals.on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

      The Company isWe are not a party to any pending legal proceedings.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.2001.

Executive Officers Of The Registrant

      The Company’sOur executive officers hold office until the first meeting of the Board of Directors following the annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly chosen and qualified, or until they resign or are removed from office in accordance with the Company’sour By-laws.

      The following table provides certain information with respect to the Company’sour executive officers.

       
Principal Occupation and Other Business
NameAgeExperience During the Past Five Years



John A. Spears  5152  President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director since May 1999. President and Chief Executive Officer of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from August 1995 to May 1999. President and Chief Executive Officer of MelaRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 1993 to 1995. Senior Vice President of Immunex Corp from 1989 to 1993.
Denis M. O’Donnell, M.D.  4748  Chairman of the Board of Directors of Novavax, Inc. since May 2000. General Partner at Seaside Partners, LP, a private equity limited partnership, since 1997. Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Novavax, Inc. from June 1999 to May 2000. General Partner at Seaside Partners, LP, a private equity limited partnership, since 1997. Senior Advisor to Novavax from 1997 to 1998. President of Novavax from 1995 to 1997. Vice President, Business Development of Novavax from 1992 to 1995. Vice President of IGI, Inc. from 1991 to 1995. Director of the Clinical Research Center of MTRA, Inc., a provider of contract pharmaceutical research, from 1986 to 1991.
D. Craig Wright, M.D.  5051  Chief Scientific Officer of Novavax since 1993. Founder and Senior Director of Medical Research of Univax Biologics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 1988 to 1992.

1718


       
Principal Occupation and Other Business
NameAgeExperience During the Past Five Years



James R. Mirto  5859  Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since May 2000. Vice President, New Product Development and Licensing of Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from August 1993 to February 2000. Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Adria Laboratories, from April 1990 to November 1992.
Dennis W. Genge  4849  Vice President and Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer since October 2000. Vice President and Controller of Pyxis Corporation from April 1999 to September 2000. Executive Director of Accounting and Finance and Controller of Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from July 1991 to March 1999.
Ann P. McGeehan32General Counsel since February 2002. Registered Patent Attorney of Covington & Burling from July 2000 to January 2002. Intellectual Property and Corporate Associate of McDermott Will & Emery from November 1998 to January 2000. Intellectual Property and Corporate Associate of Pepper Hamilton from January 1998 to September 1998. Intellectual Property Associate of Seidel Gonda Lavorgna Monaco from June 1996 to January 1998.

1819


PART II

Item 5.  Market For Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

      The Company’s Common StockOur common stock was held by approximately 813770 stockholders of record as of March 9, 2001. The Company has8, 2002. We have never paid cash dividends on its Common Stock. The Companyour common stock. We currently anticipatesanticipate that itwe will retain all of itsour earnings for use in the development of itsour business and doesdo not anticipate payingintend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

      The Company’s Common StockOur common stock ($.01 par value) is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol NVAX. Prior to July 2001, our common stock was traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “NOX”.NOX. The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, the high and low sales prices for our common stock, on the Company’s Common Stock.applicable exchange.

             
Quarter Ended:HighLowHighLow





December 31, 2001 $15.55 $10.51 
September 30, 2001 14.50 9.06 
June 30, 2001 11.00 6.35 
March 31, 2001 11.00 7.10 
December 31, 2000 $9.48 $6.75  9.48 6.75 
September 30, 2000 9.19 6.13  9.19 6.13 
June 30, 2000 8.63 4.50  8.63 4.50 
March 31, 2000 12.38 4.75  12.38 4.75 
December 31, 1999 $6.19 $3.63 
September 30, 1999 4.50 3.13 
June 30, 1999 4.19 3.06 
March 31, 1999 4.00 1.88 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

      In December 2000, Novavax acquired privately owned Fielding Pharmaceutical Company. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, Novavax acquired 100% of the outstandingJanuary 2002, we issued 362,319 shares of Fielding for $31.5 million, consisting of $13 million in cash and 2,312,501 shares of Novavax common stock, valued at $18.5 million. An additional $5$5.0 million, to the former shareholders of Fielding Pharmaceutical Company pursuant to the terms of an earn-out provision set forth in either Novavax common stock or cash will be paid to formerour merger agreement with Fielding, shareholdersexecuted in March 2002.December 2000. The shares were issued in a private placement in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and a resale registration statement was filed with the Commission and has become effective.

Item 6.  Selected Consolidated Financial Data

      The selected consolidated financial data set forth below has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. This information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes thereto, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                         
For the years ended December 31,For the years ended December 31,


1996199719981999200019971998199920002001










(amounts in thousands, except share and per share information)(amounts in thousands, except share and per share information)
Statement of Operations Data:
Statement of Operations Data:
  
RevenuesRevenues $56 $520 $681 $1,181 $2,475  $520 $681 $1,181 $2,475 $24,066 
Loss from operationsLoss from operations (5,534) (4,791) (5,152) (4,566) (12,742) (4,791) (5,152) (4,566) (12,742) (9,255)
Net lossNet loss (5,495) (4,547) (4,817) (4,506) (12,191) (4,547) (4,817) (4,506) (12,191) (9,745)
Loss applicable to common stockholdersLoss applicable to common stockholders (5,495) (4,547) (7,045) (4,506) (12,191) (4,547) (7,045) (4,506) (12,191) (9,745)
Per share information: 
(basic and diluted) 
Basic and diluted per share information: 
Loss applicable to common stockholdersLoss applicable to common stockholders $(0.54) $(0.39) $(0.57) $(0.31) $(0.64) $(0.39) $(0.57) $(0.31) $(0.64) $(0.43)
Weighted average number of shares outstandingWeighted average number of shares outstanding 10,132,896 11,667,428 12,428,246 14,511,081 19,015,719  11,667,428 12,428,246 14,511,081 19,015,719 22,670,274 
                                      
As of December 31,As of December 31,


1996199719981999200019971998199920002001










Balance Sheet Data:
  
Total current assets $3,221 $4,303 $1,207 $1,143 $17,036  $4,303 $1,207 $1,143 $17,036 $25,027 
Working capital 2,640 4,014 349 (480) 12,331  4,014 349 (480) 12,331 18,030 
Total assets 5,722 6,823 3,819 4,463 56,529  6,823 3,819 4,463 56,529 67,115 
Convertible debt    20,000 30,000 
Stockholders’ equity 5,117 6,522 2,961 2,840 31,824  6,522 2,961 2,840 31,824 27,493 

1920


Summarized Quarterly Financial Information for the Years ended December 31, 20002001 and 1999:2000:

                          
Quarter EndedQuarter Ended


March 31June 30September 30December 31March 31June 30September 30December 31








(in thousands except per share data)(in thousands except per share data)
“unaudited”
2001 
Revenues $4,966 $7,945 $5,038 $6,117 
Cost of sales 1,043 1,061 822 1,126 
Research and development costs 2,592 3,837 1,757 2,589 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 3,484 4,729 4,831 5,450 
Net loss (2,232) (1,808) (2,513) (3,192)
Net loss per share $(.10) $(.08) $(.11) $(.14)
2000  
Revenues $710 $588 $370 $807  $710 $588 $370 $807 
Research and development costs 1,524 2,113 2,924 2,797  1,524 2,113 2,924 2,797 
General and administrative expenses 641 1,302 822 3,094  641 1,302 822 3,094 
Net loss (1,350) (2,641) (3,213) (4,987) (1,350) (2,641) (3,213) (4,987)
Net loss per share $(0.08) $(0.14) $(0.17) $(0.25) $(0.08) $(0.14) $(0.17) $(0.25)
1999 
Revenues $76 $252 $143 $710 
Research and development costs 497 627 1,119 1,111 
General and administrative expenses 468 531 807 587 
Net loss (881) (884) (1,769) (972)
Net loss per share $(0.07) $(0.06) $(0.12) $(0.07)

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     This annual report may contain predictions, estimates and otherForward-Looking Statements:The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. The Company and its representatives may, from time to time, make written or verbal forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in our reports to stockholders. Generally, the inclusion of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “will,” and similar expressions identify statements that involve a numberconstitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of risksSection 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and uncertainties, includingSection 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those discussed at “Riskssections. The forward-looking statements are and Uncertainties.”will be based upon management’s then-current views and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance, and are applicable only as of the dates of such statements. This outlook represents our current judgment on the future direction of our business. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future product development and related clinical trials, and statements regarding future research and development.development and statements concerning future results of operations. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, the following: general economic and business conditions; competition; technological advances; ability to obtain rights to technology; ability to obtain and enforce patents; ability to commercialize and manufacture products; results of preclinical studies; results of research and development activities; business abilities and judgment of personnel; availability of qualified personnel; changes in, or failure to comply with, governmental regulations; ability to obtain adequate financing in the future; and other factors referenced herein. See our detailed discussion in “Risks and Uncertainties”. Past results and trends should not be used by investors to anticipate future results or trends. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of this annual report

Overview

      The Company has incurred net losses since its inception fromNovavax is a fully-integrated specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the research, development and commercialization of itsproducts utilizing our proprietary drug delivery and vaccine technologies for human pharmaceuticals, vaccineslarge and growing markets, concentrating on the areas of women’s healthcare and infectious diseases. Our lead product candidate, ESTRASORB™, is the first transdermal lotion for estrogen replacement therapy for which a New Drug Application has been accepted for filing by the Food and Drug Administration. The New Drug Application for ESTRASORB was submitted in June 2001 and was accepted for filing in August 2001. We

21


are seeking FDA approval of ESTRASORB for the reduction of hot flashes in menopausal women and, if approved, we believe ESTRASORB will be competitively positioned to address the $1.8 billion estrogen replacement therapy market in the United States. In our Phase II and III clinical trials, women using ESTRASORB experienced a statistically significant reduction in the number of hot flashes, the primary endpoint of our study, with many women reporting a total elimination of hot flashes while using the product. We also believe that ESTRASORB offers additional advantages over other estrogen replacement therapies, including ease of use, more rapid onset of estrogen therapy and a lower incidence of skin irritation and nausea.

      Our drug delivery technologies involve the use of our patented oil and water emulsions which we believe can be used as vehicles for the transdermal and injectable delivery of a wide variety of drugs and other therapeutic products, including hormones, anti-bacterial and anti-viral products and vaccine adjuvants. As of December 31, 2000adjuvants, which are substances added to vaccines to enhance their effectiveness. We believe that our accumulated deficit was $55.1 million. We expecttechnologies represent the lossesfirst time that alcohol soluble hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone, have been encapsulated and delivered through the skin. In addition to continueESTRASORB, our product candidates using these technologies include ANDROSORB™, a transdermal testosterone lotion that is in the near-term, as we conduct additional humanPhase II clinical trials, ANDRO-JECT™, a long-acting subcutaneous injectable formulation of testosterone that is in preclinical development, and seek regulatory approval for our product candidates.a transdermal progestin lotion that is also in preclinical development. We also expect to continue to incur operating losses over the time period required to develop our products, or until such time as revenues, to offset the losses, are sufficient to fund our continuing operations.

      In August 1999, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets (excluding cash and accounts receivable) of the Biomedical Services Laboratory (“BSD”) division of DynCorp of Reston, Virginia. The total consideration and direct costs for the acquisition were $860,000. Theconduct research and development activities of BSD are conducted in an approximately 12,000 square foot facility located in Rockville, Maryland. BSD is engaged in contract research, developmenton preventative and pilot manufacturing of humantherapeutic vaccines for government laboratories and other vaccine companies. The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase methoda variety of accounting for business combinations.infectious diseases.

      In December 2000, Novavaxwe acquired privately owned Fielding Pharmaceutical Company (“Fielding”), based in St. Louis, Missouri, which sells, markets and distributes a proprietary line of pharmaceutical products focused on

20


women’s health. Fielding fills, packages and warehouses all of its own products, which are purchased from contract manufacturers. Novavax will operate Fielding as a wholly owned subsidiary. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, Novavaxwe acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Fielding for $31.5 million, consisting of $13 million in cash and 2,312,501 shares of Novavax common stock, valued at $18.5$36.5 million. An additional $5 million in either Novavax common stock or cash will be paid to former Fielding shareholders in March 2002. The acquisition has been accounted for in the accompanying financial statements under the purchase method of accounting for business combinations.

      In December 2000 we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (“King”) whereby we agreed to make a $25 millionissue to King 4% senior convertible note investment in Novavax. The note is convertible into Novavax Common Stock at $10.00 per share which was an 18% premiumpromissory notes up to a 20 day trading average prior to the closing. The note carries$25.0 million. On that same date, we issued a 4% couponsenior convertible promissory note to King for $20.0 million in principal. In September 2001, we issued two additional 4% senior convertible promissory notes for $5.0 million each. All of the notes, totaling $30.0 million (the “Notes”), are due December 19, 2007 with interest payable semi-annuallyin semi-annual installments in cash, andor in certain circumstances, up to 50% in our common stock. As part of the transaction, Novavax received $20 million in December 2000 and will receive an additional $5 million when Novavax files a New Drug Application (“NDA”) for its topical transdermal estrogen replacement therapy, ESTRASORB™, expected to be filed in the first half of 2001. Novavax used a portion of the funds to complete its acquisition of Fielding and will use the balance for general operating purposes.

      In January 2001, we also signedentered into a co-promotion agreement with King for ESTRASORB™,the Company’s topical transdermal estrogen replacement therapy, ESTRASORB in the United States and Puerto Rico (the “Territory”). We also entered into a license agreement with King for many countries outside the United States. In addition,June 2001, we expanded and amended the agreements (the “Amended Agreements”). The Amended Agreements grant King exclusive rights to promote, market and distribute ESTRASORB in Canada, and five additional countries in Europe, and added ANDROSORB, a topical testosterone replacement therapy for testosterone deficient women. We feel this partnership has the potential to provide us with deeper penetration into the women’s healthcare market for ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB. Under the terms of the Amended Agreements we received $3.0 million from King in up-front licensing fees, and we will combinealso receive additional milestone payments of $1.0 million upon ESTRASORB’s approval in Canada and $2.0 million upon the first approval of ESTRASORB in one of the five additional countries in Europe. We will also receive royalties on future sales outside the Territory. Under the Amended Agreements, we also received a milestone payment from King of $2.5 million for our submission of the ESTRASORB New Drug Application, in June 2001, and an additional milestone payment of $2.5 million for the acceptance for filing of our New Drug Application by the FDA in August 2001. In addition, the Amended Agreements also combined U.S. sales efforts with King to begin co-promoting one of King’s products already on the market, Nordette®, a birth control pill. We

      In another agreement in January 2001, we also acquired AVC™Cream and Suppositories (“AVC”) from King in January 2001, for $3.3 million, which had previously been marketed by King for the treatment of vaginal bacterial infections.

22


Significant Accounting Policies and Changes to Accounting Policies

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

      We have identified below some of our more significant accounting policies and changes to accounting policies. For further discussion of our accounting policies see Footnote 2“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

      We recognize revenue in accordance with the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101,Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,whereby revenue is not recognized until it is realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Up-front payments and licensing fees are deferred and recognized as earned over the life of the related agreement. Milestone payments are recognized as revenue upon achievement of contract-specified events and when there are no remaining performance obligations. Revenues from product sales are recognized upon shipment, net of allowances for returns, rebates and chargebacks. We are obligated to accept from customers the return of pharmaceuticals, which have reached their expiration date. Revenues from the sale of scientific prototype vaccines and adjuvants are recorded as the products are shipped.

      Revenues earned under research contracts are recognized on the percentage of completion method as described in Statement of Position 81-1,Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. The extent of progress toward completion is measured on the cost-to-cost method. When the current estimates of total contract revenue and contract cost indicate a loss, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is made.

Advertising and Promotion Costs

      All costs associated with advertising and promotion is expensed as incurred. Advertising and promotion expense, including samples, was $1.9 million in 2001. Prior to 2001, we incurred no material advertising or promotional expenses. Our advertising and promotion expenses will substantially increase in 2002 as we prepare for the anticipated approval and subsequent launch of ESTRASORB. If the approval of ESTRASORB is delayed we will be able to defer some, but not all, of the expenses related to this product launch.

Research and Development Costs

      Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. We will continue to incur research and development costs as we continue to expand our product development activities in our women’s healthcare and infectious disease programs. Our research and development costs have, and will continue to include expenses for internal development personnel, supplies and facilities, clinical trials, regulatory compliance and filings, validation of processes and start up costs to establish commercial manufacturing capabilities.

Goodwill and Intangibles Assets

      Goodwill and intangible assets principally result from business acquisitions. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair values; the excess of the purchase price over the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill and intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 5 to 15 years. The company periodically evaluates the periods of amortization to determine whether later events and circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives.

23


      In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 “Business Combination,” and SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Under the new rules, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives will no longer be amortized but will be subject to annual impairment tests in accordance with the Statements. Other intangible assets will continue to be amortized over their useful lives.

      We will apply the new rules on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets beginning in the first quarter of 2002. We will begin to perform the first of the required impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as of January 1, 2002 and have not yet determined what the effect these test may have on our earnings and financial position. Amortization of goodwill for the year ended 2001 was approximately $2.5 million and will no longer be recorded subsequent to December 31, 2001.

Future Accounting for Co-promotion Agreement

      In 2002 we anticipate marketing and selling ESTRASORB in the Territory. Under the terms of the co-promotion agreement with King we will record all of the product sales, returns and allowances and cost of sales for ESTRASORB. The resultant gross margin will be shared equally with King and the payment to King will be recorded as a selling and marketing expense on our statement of operations. In the co-promotion agreement both parties will also share equally in committee approved marketing expenses for the products. All direct marketing expenses will be recorded by us, for which King will reimburse us fifty percent.

      The following is a discussion of theour historical consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Novavax and its subsidiaries. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto set forth in Item 8 to this Report.

YearResults of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,2001, 2000 (“2000”), asand 1999

Revenues

      Revenues for the year ended 2001 were $24.1 million compared to $2.5 million in 2000 and $1.2 million in 1999. This represents an increase of $21.6 million or 864% from 2000 to 2001, and an increase of $1.3 million or 108% from 1999 to 2000. The increase from 2000 to 2001 relates primarily to $17.3 million from products sales related to our acquisitions of Fielding and the AVC product line, $4.0 million for one-time milestone payments from King for the timely submission and acceptance of our ESTRASORB New Drug Application by the FDA, and $125,000 for license fees. In addition to our new revenue sources, we recorded $2.7 million from research and development contracts, primarily from the National Institutes of Health and other governmental agencies. Revenues for 2000 included $750,000 in license fees from King and $1.7 million from research and development contracts, including $1.4 million for contracts with Year Ended December 31,the NIH and other government agencies. In 1999, (“1999”)our revenues included $250,000 from a license agreement with King and $370,000 from contracts with the NIH and other governmental agencies. A summary of our revenues is set forth below.

              
200120001999



Product sales $17,252  $  $ 
Contract research and development  2,689   1,725   931 
Milestone and licensing fees  4,125   750   250 
   
   
   
 
 Total revenue $24,066  $2,475  $1,181 
   
   
   
 

Net Losses

      Our netNet loss for 20002001 was $9.7 million or $(0.43) per share, compared to $12.2 million or $(0.64) per share compared tofor 2000 and $4.5 million or $(0.31) per share in 1999. The improvement from 2000 to 2001 of $2.5 million or $0.21 per share relates primarily to gross margin on product sales due to our acquisitions of Fielding and the AVC product line and milestone revenue for payments from King, offset in 2001 by additional selling, general and administrative costs to support those product sales, the initiation of commercialization activities for ESTRASORB

24


and additional research and development costs. The increase in losses from 1999 which is an increaseto 2000 of $7.7 million or $(0.33) per share. Revenuesshare resulted from additional general and administrative costs associated with financing and acquisitions activities, the hiring of $2.5additional senior management and personnel to support our growth and increases in research and development expenses primarily due to costs associated with our clinical trials and manufacturing process validation activities related to our ESTRASORB product candidate.

Cost of Sales

      Cost of sales was $4.1 million in 2001. We had no product sales or cost of sales in 2000 or 1999. The increase relates to the acquisition of products from Fielding and the AVC product line in December 2000 and January 2001, respectively. Our cost of sales, and related investment in inventory, will increase in 2002 as we prepare for the anticipated launch of ESTRASORB.

Research and Development Expenses

      Research and development expenses were recognized during 2000,$10.8 million for 2001, compared to $1.2$9.4 million for 2000 and $3.4 million in 1999. Revenues inThe increase from 2000 included $750,000 from a license agreement entered into in October 1999 with Parkedale Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of King. The license agreement included a non-refundable license payment of $1.0 million. We recognized $250,000 under this agreement in 1999. In addition revenuesto 2001 of $1.4 million or 15% was primarily due to costs associated with the filing of a New Drug Application for ESTRASORB and $370,000 were recognizedfor internal development costs associated with our infectious diseases programs offset by a decrease in clinical trial expenses. The increase from 1999 to 2000 of $6.0 million or 176% was primarily due to costs associated with our clinical trials and manufacturing process validation of our ESTRASORB product candidate, which completed Phase III clinical trials in 2000, and 1999,the full year effect of expenses incurred by our vaccine development group which was acquired in late 1999.

      We generally do not track our historical research and development total costs by project; rather, we track external direct costs incurred by project. Internal direct costs, such as labor in addition to overhead costs are not tracked by project. For this reason, we cannot accurately estimate with any degree of certainty what our historical costs have been for any particular research and development project.

Reconciliation of Significant Research and Development Projects

      The following table reconciles the external direct costs incurred to date for our major projects to our total research and development expense.

              
Project200120001999




ESTRASORB (external cost) $4,327  $3,902  $945 
Infectious Disease Vaccines  3,348   2,219   639 
   
   
   
 
 Direct costs  7,675   6,121   1,584 
Other costs (labor & overhead)  3,100   3,237   1,770 
   
   
   
 
Total $10,775  $9,358  $3,354 
   
   
   
 

Estimated Cost and Time to Complete Major Projects

      The amounts of the expenditures that will be necessary to execute our business plan are subject to numerous uncertainties, which may adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources. As of December 31, 2001, several of our proprietary product candidates were in various stages of development. Due to the inherent nature of our development, future market demand for products and factors outside of our control, such as clinical results and regulatory approvals, we are unable to estimate the completion dates and the estimated total costs for several of our products. However, due to the late stage status of our ESTRASORB project we

25


believe that the duration and estimated cost to complete is reasonably predictable. We have included that information in the following table.
2002
EstimatedEstimated
CurrentDevelopmentCompletion
ProjectStatusCostsDates




ESTRASORBNDA filed$1-3  million2002

      In addition to the project listed above we are currently developing other product candidates, but do not believe that it is possible to estimate the completion date or cost to complete. The duration and the cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project as a result of differences arising during clinical trial protocol, including, among others, the following:

• number of patients that ultimately participate in the trial;
• duration of the patient follow-up that seems appropriate in view of the results;
• number of clinical sites included in the trials; and
• length of time required to enroll suitable patient subjects.

      In addition, we test our potential products in numerous pre-clinical studies to identify among other things the daily dosage amounts. We may conduct multiple clinical trials to cover a variety of indications for each product candidate. As we obtain results for our trials we may elect to discontinue clinical trials for certain product candidates or indications. We further believe that it is not possible to predict the length of regulatory approval time. Factors that are outside our control could significantly delay the approval and marketability of our product candidates.

      As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, among others, the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects are difficult to estimate and are subject to numerous variations. Our inability to complete our research and development projects in a timely manner could significantly increase our capital requirements and could adversely impact our liquidity. These uncertainties could force us to seek additional, external sources of financing from time to time in order to continue with our business strategy. For more discussion of the risk and uncertainties and our liquidity, see “Risks and Uncertainties” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Selling and Marketing Expenses

      Selling and marketing expenses were $8.5 million for 2001. Prior to our acquisition of Fielding and the AVC product line in 2000 and 2001, respectively, under contractsand the anticipated approval of ESTRASORB we had no sales or marketing expense. In 2001, we incurred $4.1 million of selling expenses and $4.4 million of marketing costs to support our current product sales, as well as pre-launch marketing expense for our anticipated launch of ESTRASORB. We expect selling and marketing costs to increase substantially with the National Institutescommercialization of Health (“NIH”)ESTRASORB in 2002. In addition, all payments made to King in connection with the co-promotion of ESTRASORB will be recorded as selling and other government agencies.marketing expenses in our statement of operations.

General and Administrative

      General and administrative expenses were $10.0 million in 2001, compared to $5.9 million forin 2000 compared toand $2.4 million incurred in 1999. The increase from 2000 to 2001 of $4.1 million or 69% was due to a number of factors, including approximately $2.8 million of goodwill and intangible asset amortization related to our acquisitions of Fielding and the AVC product line, the increase in personnel from the Fielding acquisition, and the full effect of increases in administrative and executive employees hired during 2000 to support our growth. The increase from 1999 which is an increaseto 2000 of $3.5 million or 145%. The increase was due primarily to costs incurred for financing and acquisition activities and the hiring of additional senior management and personnel to support our growth. Research and development expenses were $9.4 million and $3.4 million for 2000 and 1999, respectively. This $6.0 million, or 176% increase in research and development expenses is primarily due to costs associated with our clinical trials and manufacturing process validation activities related to our ESTRASORB product, which completed Phase III clinical trials. Additional increases in 2000 are due to the effect of a full year of expenses incurred by BSD. Novavax expects costs related to its NDA submission, manufacturing process validation and BSD programs to continue to increase during 2001.

26


Interest Income/(Expense)

      Net interest expense was $490,000 in 2001 compared to interest income was $551,000 in 2000 compared toand $60,000 in 1999. The increase in the interest expense relates to the issuance of the Notes, totaling $30.0 million to King, offset by additional interest income from higher cash balances during 2001 compared to 2000. The increase in the interest income in 2000 relates to higher average cash balances from financing activities during 2000 compared to 1999.

Year Ended December 31, 1999 (“1999”), as compared with Year Ended December 31, 1998 (“1998”)

      Our net loss available to common stockholders for 1999 was $4.5 million or $(0.31) per share, compared to $7.0 million or $(0.57) per share for 1998, which was a decrease of $2.5 million, or $(0.26) per share. In 1998, charges for a dividend, a deemed dividend and offering costs, together totaling $2.2 million, relating to mandatory — redeemable convertible preferred stock resulted in the increased loss in 1998 when compared to 1999. There were no similar charges for 1999.

21


      Revenues of $1.2 million were received in 1999, compared to $.7 million in 1998. The $500,000 increase relates to payments under license and research contracts from BSD which was acquired in August 1999. In October 1999, the Company also entered into a licensing agreement with Parkedale Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of King. The license agreement included a non-refundable license payment of $1.0 million. We recognized $250,000 under this agreement in 1999.

      General and administrative expenses were $2.4 million for both 1999 and 1998. Research and development expenses were $3.4 million for both 1999 and 1998. Increases in research costs for the newly acquired BSD operation and personnel in 1999 were offset by reductions in the number of products in clinical development programs. As expected costs related to our clinical trials, manufacturing process validation and BSD programs increased during 2000.

      Net interest income was $60,000 in 1999 compared to $335,000 in 1998. The decrease in the interest income relates to lower average cash balances during 1999 compared to 1998.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Our capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including but not limited to the progress of our research and development programs, the progress of preclinical and clinical testing, the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals, the commercialization of our product candidates, the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights, competing technological and market developments, and changes in our development of commercialization activities and arrangements. We currentlyplan to have twomultiple products in clinical trials.various stages of product development and we believe our research and development as well as selling, marketing and general administrative expenses and capital requirements will continue to increase. Future activities including clinical development, the establishment of commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities and the development of sales and marketing programs are subject to our ability to raise funds through debt or equity financing, or collaborative arrangements with industry partners. From 1999 through December 31, 2001 we have financed our operations primarily from:

• the private placement of 1,651,000 shares of common stock in 1999 with net proceeds of approximately $4.0 million;
• the private placement of 2,813,850 shares of common stock in 2000 with net proceeds of approximately $10.5 million;
• proceeds of approximately $30.0 million in 2000 and 2001 from issuance of the Notes to King (for details on these transactions, refer to our discussion in the Overview section above);
• proceeds of $8.0 million from King in 2001 from licensing fees and milestone payments (for details on these transactions, refer to our discussion in the Overview section above);
• and net proceeds of $12.9 million from 1999 through 2001 from the exercise of stock options and warrants.

      In January 1998, the Company entered into Subscription AgreementsAt December 31, 2001 we had cash and cash equivalents of $20.0 million, compared to effectuate the private placement of 6,500 shares of Series A Custom Convertible Preferred Stock, $1,000 par value (the “Preferred Stock”).$14.9 million at December 31, 2000. We invest our cash and cash equivalents in highly liquid, interest bearing, investment grade and government securities in order to preserve principal. The closing occurred on January 28, 1998 (the “Issuance Date”) at an aggregate purchase price of $6.5 million.

      Prior$5.1 million increase in 2001 was due to the subsequent repurchase of all the outstanding Preferred Stock, $1.5$15.4 million of the original issue had been converted into 1,043,956 shares of Common Stock, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Preferred Stock. In October 1998, we entered into agreements to repurchase the remaining Preferred Stock. We repurchased the remaining outstanding $5.0 million of Preferred Stock plus accrued dividends at the annual rate of five percent. The terms of the Preferred Stock also required us to pay the holders of the Preferred Stock $225,000 in dividends. This amount was paid in cash of $179,000 and throughfinancing activities from the issuance of 32,492 shares$10.0 million of convertible notes and the Company’s Common Stock. The Company incurred transaction fees associated with the placement, conversionexercise of $5.4 million in options and repurchasewarrants, offset by our investments in capital equipment of the Preferred Stock of $502,000 which are included$2.4 million and in the accompanying financial statements as accretionAVC product line of Preferred Stock.

      In April 1999,$3.3 million and cash used in operations of $4.6 million. Of the net $4.6 million used in operations, we entered into Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreements for the private placement of 1,651,100 shares of our Common Stock to accredited investors (the “Private Placement”). One of the principals of one of the investors is also a director of the Company. The issuance price of the Common Stock was $2.50 per share. Each share was sold together with a non-transferable warrant for the purchase of .25 additional shares at an exercise price of $3.75. The warrants have a three-year term. Net proceeds from the Private Placement were approximately $4.0 million. Placement agents fees of $215,000 were paid in cash and shares of common stock. Non-transferable warrants for the purchase of 143,000 shares of our Common Stock, with an exercise price of $3.00 per share and a three-year term, were also issued to the placement agents.

      In January 2000, we closed a private placement of 2,813,850 shares of our Common Stock to accredited investors (the “2000 Private Placement”). The issuance price of the Common Stock was $4.00 per share. Each share was sold together with a non-transferable warrant for the purchase of .25 additional shares at an exercise price of $6.75. The warrants have a three-year term. Placement agent fees were approximately $675,000, which was paid in cash. Additionally, non-transferable warrants for the purchase of 281,385 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, with an exercise price of $6.75 per share and a three-year term, were issued to the placement agent. Net proceeds to the Company from the 2000 Private Placement were approximately $10.5 million.

22


      In December 2000, we acquired Fielding and also received $20 million from a convertible note from King. For details on these transactions, refer to our discussion in the Overview section above.

      The Company used approximately $9.4$10.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2000 to fund the activities of itsour research and development programs and costs associated with obtaining regulatory approvals, clinical testing and manufacturing process validation. Cash balances available to the Company, including the financings described above, funded these expenditures.

      Cash and cash equivalents on December 31, 2000, totaled $14.9Working capital was $18.0 million compared to $732,000 at December 31, 1999.2001 compared to $12.3 million at December 31, 2000. The $14.1 million increase in working capital was attributableprimarily due to the financingcash flow activities above and Fielding acquisition previously discussed.the increase in accounts receivable of $2.9 million, offset by an increase in current liabilities of $2.3 million.

      We estimate that based on historical and projected levels of spending and revenues, giving effect to the recent Fielding acquisition noted above, and without giving effect to any future equity financing, existing cash resources will be sufficient to finance our operationsoperating activities for approximately 12 to 1815 months. Past spending levels arewill not necessarilybe indicative of future spending. Futurespending as we are currently incurring increased expenses for selling, marketing and start-up manufacturing costs in anticipation of the approval and subsequent launch of ESTRASORB. In addition, we have recently entered into a long term lease agreement for a 20,000 square foot manufacturing facility for ESTRASORB. The leased area is currently being built out to meet our requirements and is expected to be available in the second quarter of 2002. We have also placed orders for the equipment required to manufacture ESTRASORB at projected

27


commercial levels. The capital expenditures required for these activities will be between $9.0 and $12.0 million in 2002, and we are currently seeking debt financing from public and private sources, to fund these capital requirements. If the approval of ESTRASORB is delayed or denied we will be able to reduce some, but not all, of the expenses and capital expenditures related to this product introduction. Additional future expenditures for other product development, including thesethose related to outside testing and human clinical trials, are discretionary and, accordingly, can be adjusted to available cash. As weWe currently plan to continue to progress in our clinical development activities and commercial scale-up of product manufacturing of additional product candidates and we anticipate future increases in spending associated with these activities. Moreover, we

      We may seek to establish additional collaborations with industry partners to defray the costs of clinical trials and other related activities. We will also consider sources of additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing, collaborative arrangements with pharmaceutical companies, government agency contracts or from other sources. There can be no assurance that additional funding or bank financing will be available at all or on acceptable terms to permit successful commercialization of all our technologies and products. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to significantly delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of itsour research or development programs, or seek alternative measures including arrangements with collaborative partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of itsour technologies, product candidates or products.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

      The following table summarizes our current obligations and commitments:

                      
Less than 11–34–5After 5
TotalYearYearsYearsYears





Commitments & Obligations
                    
Convertible notes $30,000  $  $  $  $30,000 
Operating leases  2,766   1,052   1,380   334    
Manufacturing facility lease  8,433   1,560   3,262   3,461   150 
Purchase commitments  7,199   7,199          
   
   
   
   
   
 
 Total commitments & obligations $48,398  $9,811  $4,642  $3,795  $30,150 
   
   
   
   
   
 

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

      Not applicable.Information required under this section is contained in Part I, Item I of this report under the caption “Risk and Uncertainties” and in Item 8 of this report, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

      The financial statements and notes thereto listed in the accompanying index to financial statements (Item 14) are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

      None.Not applicable.

2328


PART III

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

      The information required by this item is contained in part under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I hereof, and the remainder is contained in the Company’sour Proxy Statement for the Company’sour Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 9, 20018, 2002 (the “2001“2002 Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” and “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” and is incorporated herein by this reference. The Company expectsWe expect to file the 20012002 Proxy Statement within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.2001.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

      The information required by this item is contained in the Company’s 20012002 Proxy Statement under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

      The information required by this item is contained in the Company’s 20012002 Proxy Statement under the caption “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

      The information required by this item is contained in the Company’s 20012002 Proxy Statement under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and is incorporated herein by reference.

2429


PART IV

Item 14.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

   
(a)(1) Financial Statements:
  Reports of Independent Accountants; Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20002001 and 1999;2000; Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 1998;1999; Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 1998;1999; Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 1998;1999; Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
  Schedules are either not applicable or not required because the information required is contained in the financial statements or notes thereto. Condensed financial information of the CompanyNovavax is omitted since there are no substantial amounts of restricted net assets applicable to the Company’sNovavax’s consolidated subsidiaries.
(a)(3) Exhibits Required to be Filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
  Exhibits marked with a single asterisk are filed herewith, and exhibits marked with a double plus sign referencerefer to management contracts, compensatory plans or arrangements, filed in response to Item 14 (a)(3) of the instructions to Form 10-K. The other exhibits listed have previously been filed with the Commission and are incorporated herein by reference.
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company [Incorporated(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 0-26770, filed March 21, 1997 (the “1996 Form 10-K”).]), as amended by the Certificate of Amendment dated December 18, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 0-26770, filed March 29, 2001 (the “2000 Form 10-K”))
3.2 Amended and Restated By-lawsBy-Laws of The Company [Incorporatedthe Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.5 to the 1996 Form 10-K.]
3.3Certificate of Designations of Series A Custom Convertible Preferred Stock dated January 28, 1998. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration StatementRegistrant’s Quarterly Report on Form S-3,10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2001, File No. 333-46409,0-26770, filed February  17, 1998.]
*3.4Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated December 18, 2000.August 13, 2001 (the “2001 Q2 Form 10-Q”))
4. Specimen stock certificate for shares of Common Stock,common stock, par value $.01 per share. [Incorporatedshare (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 0-26770, filed September 14, 1995 (the “Form 10”).])
††10.11995 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10)
††10.2First Amendment to the Company’s 1995 Stock Option Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on May 14, 1998, and by the Board of Directors on March 16, 1998 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-26770, filed April 15, 1999 (the “1998 Form 10-K”))
††10.3Second Amendment to the Company’s 1995 Stock Option Plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company on May 9, 2000, and by the Board of Directors on March 7, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the 2000 Form 10-K)
††10.4Director Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10)
††10.5Employment Agreement dated March 31, 1998, by and between the Company and D. Craig Wright (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the 1998 Form 10-K)
††10.6Employment Agreement dated May 13, 1999, by and between the Company and John A. Spears (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-26770, filed March 9, 2000 (the “1999 Form 10-K”))
*††10.7Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2002 by and between the Company and James R. Mirto

30


*††10.8Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2002 by and between the Company and Dennis W. Genge
10.9Agreement of Lease by and between the Company and Rivers Center Associates Limited Partnership, dated September 25, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the 1996 Form 10-K)
*10.10Agreement of Lease by and between W.M. Rickman Construction Co. and Dyncorp Advanced Technology Services, Inc. dated March 30, 1995, as assigned to Company by letter from W.M. Rickman Construction Co. dated September 1, 1999, and as amended letter from Company dated September 29, 1999
*10.11Agreement of Lease by and between GPG Enterprises, L.L.C. and The Fielding Pharmaceutical Company dated September 1, 2000
*10.12Agreement of Lease by and between Association of Enterepreneurial Sciences, Inc. and Novavax, Inc. dated March 8, 2002
*10.13Facilities Reservation Agreement dated as of February 11, 2002, between the Company and Packaging Coordinators, Inc.
10.14 License Agreement between IGEN, Inc. and Micro-Pak, Inc. [Incorporated(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, File No. 0-26770, filed April 1, 1996, (the “1995 Form 10-K”).]1996)
††10.210.15 1995 Stock Option Plan. [IncorporatedLicense Agreement by and between the Company and Parkedale Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated October 21, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.13 to the 1999 Form 10.]10-K)
††10.310.16Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 4, 2000 between the Company and the parties identified therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 19, 2000)
10.17Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets Relating to AVCProduct Line dated as of January 8, 2001, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 19, 2001)
10.18Copromotion Agreement dated as of January 8, 2001, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 19, 2001)
10.19 First Amendment to The Company 1995 Stock Option Plan approved by the stockholdersCopromotion Agreement dated as of June 29, 2001, between the Company on May 14, 1998, and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Board2001 Q2 Form 10-Q)
10.20Second Amendment to the Copromotion Agreement dated as of Directors on March 16, 1998. [IncorporatedJune 29, 2001, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2001 Q2 Form 10-Q)
10.21Exclusive License and Distribution Agreement dated as of January 8, 2001, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-26770,8-K, filed April 15, 1999. (the “1998 Form 10-K”).]January 19, 2001)
*††10.410.22First Amendment to the Exclusive License and Distribution Agreement dated as of June 29, 2001, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2001 Q2 Form 10-Q)
10.23 Second Amendment to The Company 1995 Stock Option Plan approved by the stockholdersExclusive License and Distribution Agreement dated as of June 29, 20001, between the Company on May 9, 2000, and by the Board of Directors on March 7, 2000.
††10.5Director Stock Option Plan. [IncorporatedKing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.510.4 to the 2001 Q2 Form 10.]10-Q)
10.6Agreement of Lease by and between the Company and Rivers Center Associates Limited Partnership, dated September 25, 1996. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the 1996 Form 10-K.]
††10.7Employment Agreement dated March 31, 1998, by and between the Company and D. Craig Wright [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the1998 Form 10-K.]

25


††10.8Employment Agreement dated May 13, 1999, by and between the Company and John A. Spears. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, File No. 0-26770, filed March 9, 2000. (the “1999 Form 10-K”).]
10.910.24 Form of Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated April 14, 1999, by and between the Company and the purchasers named therein. [Incorporatedtherein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the 1998 Form 10-K]10-K)

31


10.11 License Agreement by and between the Company and Parkedale Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated October 21, 1999. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the 1999 Form 10-K.]
10.1210.25Form of Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated January 28, 2000, by and between the
Company and the purchasers named therein. [Incorporatedtherein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the 1999 Form 10-K.]
10.13Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 4, 2000 between the Company and the parties identified therein. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 19, 2000.]10-K)
10.1410.26 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of December 19, 2000, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [Incorporated(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 2, 2001.]2001)
10.1510.27September 2001 Note Purchase Agreement dated as of September 7, 2001, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 5, 2001)
10.28 Investor Rights Agreement dated December 19, 2000, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [Incorporated(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 2, 2001.]2001)
10.1610.29 Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets RelatingFirst Amendment to AVCProduct Line dated as of January 8, 2001, by and between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 19, 2001.]
10.17CopromotionInvestor Rights Agreement dated as of January 8,September 7, 2001, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [Incorporated(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.299.6 to the Company’sRegistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 19, 2001.]
10.18Exclusive License and Distribution Agreement dated as of January 8, 2001, between the Company and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 19, 2001.]
16.Letter regarding change in certifying accountant. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 25, 2000.]September 5, 2001)
*21 List of Subsidiaries.
*23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Accountants.Auditors.
*23.2 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants.
27Financial Data Schedule

26


(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
  The Company filed a current report on Form 8-K on October  19, 2000 to report under Item 2 its agreement to acquire Fielding Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. In addition, the Company filed an amendment to the Form 8-K on December 18, 2000 to include under Item 7 the following financial information:
(a) Audited Combined Financial Statements of Fielding Pharmaceutical Company and MB Packaging, Inc.:
(1) Report of Independent Accountants dated October 20, 2000.
(2) Combined Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and 1998.
(3) Combined Income Statements for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998.
(4) Combined Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the two years ended December 31, 1999.
(5) Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998.
(6) Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
(b) Unaudited Interim Combined Financial Statements of Fielding Pharmaceutical Company and MB Packaging, Inc.:
(1) Unaudited Combined Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2000 and December 31, 1999.
(2) Unaudited Combined Income Statements for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2000 and 1999.
(3) Unaudited Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2000 and 1999.
(4) Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
(c) Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information of The Company and Fielding Pharmaceutical Company:
(1) Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 1999
(2) Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999.
(3) Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2000.
(4) Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements.
The Company filed a second amendment to the October 19, 2000 Form 8-K on December 21, 2000 to include under Item 2 a statement that the Fielding Pharmaceutical acquisition was completed on December 19, 2000 and under Item 99 a Press Release relating to the completion of the Fielding Pharmaceutical acquisition.None.

2732


SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 29, 200115, 2002

 NOVAVAX, INC.

By:      /s/ JOHN A. SPEARS             
 By: /s/ JOHN A. SPEARS

John A. Spears, President
and Chief Executive Officer

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacity and on the date indicated.

     
NameTitleDate



/s/ JOHN A. SPEARS

John A. Spears
 President and Chief Executive
Officer and Director
 March 29, 200115, 2002
 
/s/ DENNIS W. GENGE

Dennis W. Genge
 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) March 29, 200115, 2002
/s/ GARY C. EVANS

Gary C. Evans
 Director March 29, 200115, 2002
/s/ WILLIAM E. GEORGES

William E. Georges
DirectorMarch 15, 2002
/s/ MITCHELL J. KELLY

Mitchell J. Kelly
 Director March 29, 200115, 2002
/s/ J. MICHAEL LAZARUS, M.D.

J. Michael Lazarus, M.D.
 Director March 29, 200115, 2002
/s/ JOHN O. MARSH, JR.

John O. Marsh, Jr.
 Director March 29, 200115, 2002
/s/ MICHAEL A. MCMANUS

Michael A. McManus
 Director March 29, 200115, 2002
/s/ DENIS M. O’DONNELL, M.D.

Denis M. O’Donnell, M.D.
 Director March 29, 200115, 2002
/s/ RONALD H. WALKER

Ronald H. Walker
 Director March 29, 2001
/s/ WILLIAM E. GEORGES

William E. Georges
DirectorMarch 29, 200115, 2002

2833


INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999

Contents

   
Reports of Independent AccountantsAuditors F-2
Consolidated Financial Statements:  
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20002001 and 19992000 F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20002001 F-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20002001 F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20002001 F-7
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-8

F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTSAUDITORS

Board of Directors

Novavax, Inc.

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Novavax, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the yearyears then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.audit, the consolidated financial statements of Novavax, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999 were audited by other auditors, whose report dated February 26, 2000, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the 2000consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Novavax, Inc. at December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the consolidated results of its operations and itsit cash flows for the yearyears then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

/s/ Ernst and Young LLP

McLean, Virginia

March 2, 2001February 12, 2002

F-2


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Novavax, Inc.

      In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and related consolidated statementsstatement of operations, of cash flows and of stockholders’ equity, present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial positionresults of operations of Novavax, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1999, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.audit. We conducted our auditsaudit of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. We have not audited the consolidated financial statements of Novavax, Inc. for any period subsequent to December 31, 1999.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 26, 2000

F-3


NOVAVAX, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)thousands, except share information)
                    
December 31,December 31,


2000199920012000




ASSETS
ASSETS
 
ASSETS
 
Current assets:Current assets: Current assets: 
Cash and cash equivalents $14,864 $732 Cash and cash equivalents $20,045 $14,864 
Accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful accts of $50,000 and $0 at December 31, 2000 and 1999 954 341 Trade Accounts receivable, net 3,878 954 
Inventory 461  Inventory, net 537 461 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 757 70 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 567 757 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total current assets 17,036 1,143  Total current assets 25,027 17,036 
Property and equipment, netProperty and equipment, net 1,927 1,053 Property and equipment, net 4,326 1,927 
Goodwill and other intangible assets, netGoodwill and other intangible assets, net 37,566 2,267 Goodwill and other intangible assets, net 37,762 37,566 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total assets $56,529 $4,463  Total assets $67,115 $56,529 
 
 
   
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYLIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
Current liabilities:Current liabilities: Current liabilities: 
Accounts payable $1,401 $481 Accounts payable $1,410 $1,401 
Accrued expenses 3,200 281 Accrued expenses 4,337 3,200 
Deferred revenue 104 750 Deferred revenue – current 1,250 104 
Debt obligations  111   
 
 
 
 
  Total current liabilities 6,997 4,705 
 Total current liabilities 4,705 1,623   
 
 
 
 
 
Convertible note 20,000  
Commitments and contingencies 
Convertible notesConvertible notes 30,000 20,000 
Deferred revenue – non-currentDeferred revenue – non-current 2,625  
Stockholders’ equity:Stockholders’ equity: Stockholders’ equity: 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding   Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding   
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 22,586,304 issued and 22,104,087 outstanding at December 31, 2000, and 15,173,688 issued and 15,167,166 outstanding at December 31, 1999 226 152 Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 23,871,794 issued and 23,294,633 outstanding at December 31, 2001, and 22,586,304 issued and 22,104,087 outstanding at December 31, 2000. 239 226 
Additional paid-in capital 91,611 45,622 Additional paid-in capital 97,861 91,611 
Accumulated deficit (55,085) (42,894)Accumulated deficit (64,830) (55,085)
Deferred compensation on stock options granted  (5)Treasury stock, 577,161 shares and 482,217 shares, cost basis, at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively (5,777) (4,928)
Treasury stock, 482,217 shares and 6,522 shares, cost basis, at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively (4,928) (35)  
 
 
 
 
  Total stockholders’ equity 27,493 31,824 
 Total stockholders’ equity 31,824 2,840   
 
 
 
 
  Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $67,115 $56,529 
 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $56,529 $4,463   
 
 
 
 
 

See accompanying notes.

F-4


NOVAVAX, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
               
For the years ended December 31,

200019991998



Revenues $2,475  $1,181  $681 
   
   
   
 
Operating expenses:            
 General and administrative  5,859   2,393   2,472 
 Research and development  9,358   3,354   3,361 
   
   
   
 
  Total operating expenses  15,217   5,747   5,833 
   
   
   
 
Loss from operations  (12,742)  (4,566)  (5,152)
Interest income, net  551   60   335 
   
   
   
 
Net loss  (12,191)  (4,506)  (4,817)
Dividends on preferred stock        (1,808)
Accretion of offering cost        (420)
   
   
   
 
Loss applicable to common stockholders $(12,191) $(4,506) $(7,045)
   
   
   
 
(Basic and diluted) Loss per share applicable to common stockholders $(0.64) $(0.31) $(0.57)
   
   
   
 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)  19,015,719   14,511,081   12,428,246 
   
   
   
 
               
For the years ended December 31,

200120001999



Revenues            
 Product sales $17,252  $  $ 
 Contract research and development  2,689   1,725   931 
 Milestone and licensing fees  4,125   750   250 
   
   
   
 
  Total revenues  24,066   2,475   1,181 
Operating cost and expenses:            
 Cost of sales  4,052       
 Research and development  10,775   9,358   3,354 
 Selling and marketing  8,539       
 General and administrative  9,955   5,859   2,393 
   
   
   
 
  Total operating costs and expenses  33,321   15,217   5,747 
   
   
   
 
Loss from operations  (9,255)  (12,742)  (4,566)
Interest (expense)/income, net  (490)  551   60 
   
   
   
 
Net loss $(9,745) $(12,191) $(4,506)
   
   
   
 
Basic and diluted loss per share $(0.43) $(0.64) $(0.31)
   
   
   
 
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding  22,670,274   19,015,719   14,511,081 
   
   
   
 

See accompanying notes.

F-5


NOVAVAX, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
(in thousands, except share information)
                                            
Deferred
CompensationCommon StockAdditionalDeferredTotal
Common StockAdditionalOn StockTotal
Paid-inAccumulatedStockTreasuryStockholders’

Paid-inAccumulatedOptionsTreasuryStockholders’SharesDollarsCapitalDeficitCompensationStockEquity
SharesDollarsCapitalDeficitGrantedStockEquity







Balance, December 31, 1997
 12,031,757 $120 $37,853 $(31,343) $25 $(83) $6,522 
Company contribution to employee 401(k) 42 1 (12)   33 22 
Amortization of deferred compensation     10  10 
Private sale of preferred stock, net   1,583    1,583 
Conversion of preferred stock 1,043,956 11 1,475    1,486 
Dividend on preferred stock 32,944   (225)   (225)
Deemed dividend on preferred stock    (1,583)   (1,583)
Accretion of offering costs    (420)   (420)
Private sale of common stock, net      50 50 
Exercise of stock options 144,419 1 332    333 
Net loss    (4,817)   (4,817)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






Balance, December 31, 1998
 13,253,118 133 41,231 (38,388) (15)  2,961  13,253,118 $133 $41,231 $(38,388) $(15) $ $2,961 
Amortization of deferred compensation     10  10      10  10 
Private sale of common stock 1,651,100 17 4,111    4,128  1,651,100 17 4,111    4,128 
Offering costs 42,933  (173)    (173) 42,933  (173)    (173)
Stock issued as compensation   (43)   158 115    (43)   158 115 
Exercise of stock options 226,537 2 496   (193) 305  226,537 2 496   (193) 305 
Net loss    (4,506)   4,506     (4,506)   (4,506)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 1999
 15,173,688 152 45,622 (42,894) (5) (35) 2,840  15,173,688 152 45,622 (42,894) (5) (35) 2,840 
Amortization of deferred compensation     5  5      5  5 
Private sale of common stock, net 2,813,850 28 10,470    10,498  2,813,850 28 10,470    10,498 
Stock issued for acquisition 2,312,501 23 18,477    18,500  2,312,501 23 18,477    18,500 
Acquisition obligation   5,000    5,000    5,000    5,000 
Exercise of stock options and warrants 2,286,265 23 12,042   (4,893) 7,172  2,286,265 23 12,042   (4,893) 7,172 
Net loss    (12,191)   (12,191)    (12,191)   (12,191)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2000
 22,586,304 $226 $91,611 $(55,085) $ $(4,928) $31,824  22,586,304 226 91,611 (55,085)  (4,928) 31,824 
Exercise of stock options and warrants 1,285,490 13 6,250   (849) 5,414 
Net loss    (9,745)   (9,745)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2001
 23,871,794 $239 $97,861 $(64,830) $ $(5,777) $27,493 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

      See accompanying notes.

F-6


NOVAVAX, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
                         
For the years ended December 31,For the years ended December 31,


200019991998200120001999






Operating Activities
 
Operating Activities
 
Net loss $(12,191) $(4,506) $(4,817)Net loss $(9,745) $(12,191) $(4,506)
Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used by operating activities: Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used by operating activities: 
Gain on sale of asset  (23)  
Non-cash compensation expense 5 10 10 
Amortization 362 199 129 
Depreciation 232 183 152 
Issuance of stock to 401(k) plan and as compensation  115 22 
Loss(gain) on disposal/sale of asset 137  (23)
Non-cash compensation expense  5 10 
Amortization 3,136 362 199 
Depreciation 353 232 183 
Provision for bad debt 70   
Issuance of stock to 401(k) plan and as compensation   115 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Changes in operating assets and liabilities: 
Accounts receivable 220 (203) 112 
Inventory (211)   
Prepaid expenses and other assets (555) (45) 224 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 2,740 (180) 544 
Deferred revenue (646) 750  
Accounts receivable (2,994) 220 (203)
Inventory (76) (211)  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 190 (555) (45)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 592 2,740 (180)
Deferred revenue 3,771 (646) 750 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net cash used by operating activities (10,044) (3,700) (3,624)Net cash used by operating activities (4,566) (10,044) (3,700)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Investing activities
 
Investing activities
 
Acquisition of a business, net of cash acquired (12,466) (592)  
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquiredAcquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired  (12,466) (592)
Acquisition of product linesAcquisition of product lines (3,332)   
Capital expenditures (831) (48) (231)Capital expenditures (2,335) (831) (48)
Deferred patent costs (86) (171) (146)Deferred patent costs  (86) (171)
Proceeds from sale of asset  25  Proceeds from sale of asset   25 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities (13,383) (786) (377)Net cash used in investing activities (5,667) (13,383) (786)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Financing activities
 
Financing activities
 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible note 20,000   
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notesProceeds from issuance of convertible notes 10,000 20,000  
Payment of capital lease obligations (111) (73) (38)Payment of capital lease obligations  (111) (73)
Issuance of preferred stock   5,998 
Dividend on preferred stock   (179)
Repurchase of preferred stock   (4,979)
Proceeds from private placements of common stock 10,498 3,955 50 Proceeds from private placements of common stock  10,498 3,955 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants 7,172 305 333 Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants 5,414 7,172 305 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net cash provided by financing activities 37,559 4,187 1,185 Net cash provided by financing activities 15,414 37,559 4,187 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 14,132 (299) (2,816)Net change in cash and cash equivalents 5,181 14,132 (299)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 732 1,031 3,847 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 14,864 732 1,031 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $14,864 $732 $1,031 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $20,045 $14,864 $732 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

See accompanying notes.

F-7


NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 19981999

1.  Description of Business

      Novavax, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“Novavax” or “the Company”) was incorporated in 1987, and is a specialty biopharmaceuticalpharmaceutical company engaged in the research, development and commercialization of proprietary products focused on women’s health and infectious diseases. The Company sells, markets, and distributes a line of ethicalprescription pharmaceuticals and pre-natalprenatal vitamins. The Company’s principal technology platform involves the use of proprietary, microscopic, organized, non-phospholipid structurespatented oil and water emulsions which are used as vehicles for the delivery of a wide variety of drugs and other therapeutic products. These include certain hormones, anti-bacterial, and anti-viral products and vaccine adjuvants.adjuvants, which are substances added to vaccines to enhance their effectiveness. In June 2001, Novavax filed a New Drug Application with the Food and Drug Administration for ESTRASORB™, a transdermal lotion for estrogen replacement therapy. Novavax has several product candidates in pre-clinical and human clinical trials, including ESTRASORB™ANDROSORB™, a transdermal lotion for estrogentestosterone replacement therapy which recently completedwe expect to begin Phase III testing.II testing in the first quarter of 2002. In addition, Novavax conducts research and development on preventative and therapeutic vaccines for a variety of infectious diseases, including human papillomavirus (HPV).papillomavirus.

      The products currently under development or in clinical trials by the Company will require significant additional research and development efforts, including extensive pre-clinical and clinical testing and regulatory approval, prior to commercial use. There can be no assurance that the Company’s research and development efforts will be successful and that any of the Company’s potential products will prove to be safe and effective in clinical trial.trials. Even if developed, these products may not receive regulatory approval or be successfully introduced and marketed at prices that would permit the Company to operate profitably. The Company also recognizes that the commercial launch of any product is subject to certain risks including but not limited to manufacturing scale-up and market acceptance. No assurance can be given that the Company can generate sufficient product revenue to become profitable or generate positive cash flow from operations at all or on a sustained basis.

2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

  Basis of Presentation

      The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Novavaxthe company and its wholly owned subsidiaries Fielding Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Micro-Pak, Inc., Micro Vesicular Systems, Inc. and Lipovax, Inc.subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

      The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with insignificant interest rate risk and original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash andSubstantially all cash equivalents approximate their fair values.are held in short-term money market accounts with banks and brokerage accounts with large high quality financial institutions.

F-8


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued)

Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk

      Financial instruments, which possibly expose the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts receivable.convertible notes payable. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank and brokerage accounts and with high credit quality financial institutions, which,institutions. The balances, at times, may exceed

F-8


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued)
  Concentration of Credit Risk (Continued)

federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on such accounts.accounts and management believes the risk of loss to be minimal. Accounts receivable consist principally of amounts due from credit worthy wholesale drug distributors, the Federal Governmentfederal government and other large institutions.

The companyCompany extends credit to its customers generally without requiring collateral. The Company monitors the balances of individual customer accounts to assess any collectibility issues.and has provided a reserve for potential bad debts of $120,000 and $50,000 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Credit losses have historically been within management’s expectations. The Company has not experienced significant credit lossescarrying amount of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable approximates their fair value based on customer accounts.their short-term maturities at December 31, 2001 and 2000. The fair values of convertible notes approximate their fair value as of December 31, 2001.

      As of December 31, 1999,2001, three customers accounted for 74%40.5% of the Company’s revenues and 50.7% of the Company’s accounts receivable.

Inventories

      Inventories consist of raw materials of $263,000 and finished goods of $299,000 and are priced at the lower of cost or market, using the first-in-first-out method (FIFO).method. The December 31, 2001 inventory balance includes a $25,000 reserve for obsolete and slow moving items.

Property and Equipment

      Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment is provided under the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, generally 3 to 7 years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is provided over the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the term of the lease, which ever is shorter. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Patent CostCosts

      Costs associated with obtaining patents, principally legal costs and filing fees, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining estimated economic lives of the respective patents.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

      Goodwill and intangible assets principally result from business acquisitions. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair values; the excess of the purchase price over the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill and intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 5 to 15 years. Accumulated amortization expense was $3.3 million and $273,000 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company periodically evaluates the periods of amortization to determine whether later events and circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Recoverability of Intangibles

      The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of its long-lived assets.assets and identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the

F-9


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued)
  Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Recoverability of Intangibles (Continued)

asset may not be recoverable. Examples of events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the recoverability of the carrying value of an asset should be assessed include but are not limited to the following: a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used or a significant physical change in an asset, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to acquire or construct an asset, and/ or a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with an asset used for the purpose of producing revenue. The Company considers historical performance and anticipated future results in its evaluation of potential impairment. Accordingly, when indicators of impairment are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of these assets in reactionrelation to the operating performance of the business and future discounted and undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of these assets.

Impairment losses are recognized when the sum of expected future cash flows are less than the assets’ carrying value. No such impairment losses have been recognized to date.

Revenue Recognition

      The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101,Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,whereby revenue is not recognized until it is realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Up-front payments and licensing fees are deferred and recognized as earned over the life of the related agreement. Milestone payments are recognized as revenue upon achievement of contract-specified events and when there are no remaining performance obligations. Revenues from product sales are recognized upon shipment, net of allowances for returns, rebates and chargebacks. The Company is obligated to accept from customers the return of pharmaceuticals, which have reached their expiration date.

F-9


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued)
  Revenue Recognition (Continued)

Revenues from the sale of scientific prototype vaccines and adjuvants are recorded as the products are produced and shipped.

      Revenues earned under research contracts are recognized whenon the relatedpercentage of completion method as described in Statement of Position 81-1,Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. The extent of progress toward completion is measured on the cost-to-cost method. When the current estimates of total contract services are performed.revenue and contract cost indicate a loss, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is made.

  Net Loss per Share

      Basic earningsloss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator), during the period. DilutedShares issued during the period and shares reacquired during the period are weighted for the portion of the period that they were outstanding. The computation of diluted loss per share is computed by dividing netsimilar to the computation of basic loss availableper share except that the denominator is increased to common shareholders byinclude the weighted average number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding after giving effect to allif the dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period.

      Potentialhad been issued. Potentially dilutive common shares are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share if they are antidilutive. Net loss per share as reported was not adjusted for potential common shares, as they are antidilutive.

F-10


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

      The Company measures compensationrecognizes expense for its employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method. Under the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based compensation whenarrangements in accordance with the exercise priceprovisions of options grantedAccounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to employeesEmployees, and related Interpretations. Disclosures regarding alternative fair values of measurement and recognition methods prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(SFAS No. 123) are presented in Note 7. Accordingly, compensation cost is less thanrecognized for the excess of the estimated fair value of the underlying stock onat the date of grant deferred compensation is recognized and is amortized to compensation expensedate over the applicable vesting period.exercise price, if any. The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with EITF 96-18,Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods, or Services.

Advertising and Promotion Costs

      All costs associated with advertising and promotion are expensed as incurred. Advertising and promotion expense, including samples, was $1.9 million in 2001. Prior to 2001 the Company incurred no material advertising or promotional expenses.

Research and Development Costs

      Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes

      The Company’s income taxes are accounted for using the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future yearsattributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities.liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss carryforward. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

      The effect on deferred taxestax assets and liabilities of changes in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded based on management’s determination of the ultimate realizability of futureestablished when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets.assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20002001 and 1999.2000.

Comprehensive Loss

      Under Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, (“SFAS 130”), “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” the Company is required to display comprehensive loss and its components as part of the consolidated financial statements. Comprehensive loss is comprised of the net loss and other comprehensive income (loss), which includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from the net loss. Comprehensive loss for the Company was the same as net loss for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 1998.1999.

F-10Segment Information

      The Company currently operates in one business segment, which is the development and commercialization of products focused on women’s health and infectious diseases. The Company is managed and operated as one business. A single management team that reports to the Chief Executive Officer comprehensively manages the entire business. The Company does not operate separate lines of business with respect to its

F-11


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 19981999

2.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued)

  Segment Information (Continued)

products or product candidates. Accordingly, the Company does not have separately reportable segments as defined by FASB Statement No. 131,Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.

Recent Accounting StandardsPronouncements

      In June 1998,2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued SFAS No. 133, “Accounting141“Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 142“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” effective for Derivative Instrumentsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Under the new rules, goodwill and Hedging Activities,” which establishesintangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives will no longer be amortized but will be subject to annual impairment tests in accordance with the Statements. Other intangible assets will continue to be amortized over their useful lives.

      The Company will apply the new rules on accounting for goodwill and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. SFAS 133 requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as eitherintangible assets or liabilitiesbeginning in the statementfirst quarter of 2002. The Company will begin to perform the first of the required impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as of January 1, 2002 and has not yet determined what the effect these tests may have on the earnings and financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. Implementation of SFAS 133 is required as of the beginning of fiscal year 2001 and will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.

      In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statement.” SAB 101 provides guidance on applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition issues in financial statements. The adoption of SAB 101 did not have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. Amortization of goodwill for the year ended 2001 was approximately $2.5 million and will no longer be recorded subsequent to December 31, 2001.

      In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44 (“FIN 44”) “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation,” which addresses certain accounting issues which arose under the previously established accounting principles relating to stock-based compensation. The adoption of this interpretation did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Reclassifications

      Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

3.  Product Agreements and Acquisitions

King Pharmaceuticals Agreements

      In January 2001, we entered into a co-promotion agreement with King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (“King”) for the Company’s topical transdermal estrogen replacement therapy, ESTRASORB™ in the U.S. and Puerto Rico (the “Territory”). We also entered into a license agreement with King for many countries outside the United States. The co-promotion and license agreements (the “Agreements”) grant King the right to share equally in the revenues and expenses for manufacturing and marketing ESTRASORB in the Territory and exclusive rights to many countries outside the U.S. The Agreements also entitled us to receive up to $5.0 million in milestone payments from King for achievement of milestones outlined in the Agreements. In addition, we agreed to combine U.S. sales efforts with King to begin co-promoting one of King’s products already on the market, Nordette®, a birth control pill.

      In June 2001, we amended the Agreements (the “Amended Agreements”). The Amended Agreements modified the terms of the milestone payments and in June 2001, we recognized $2.5 million as the first milestone was achieved upon the filing of the ESTRASORB New Drug Application with the Food and Drug Administration. The second milestone was achieved upon the acceptance for filing of the New Drug Application by the FDA in August 2001. This entitled us to receive an additional $2.5 million milestone payment, which was received in September 2001.

      The Amended Agreements also grant King exclusive rights to promote, market and distribute ESTRASORB in Canada, Switzerland, Greece, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands, the only countries excluded from the original license agreement. In addition the Amended Agreements included the co-promotion and license of ANDROSORB, a topical transdermal testosterone replacement therapy for testosterone deficient women. Under the terms of the Amended Agreements we received $3.0 million from King in up-front licensing fees, which was recorded as deferred revenue and is recognized over the term of the Amended Agreements. We will also receive additional milestone payments of $1.0 million upon ESTRASORB’s

F-12


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
3.  Product Agreements and Acquisitions — (Continued)
  King Pharmaceuticals Agreements (Continued)

regulatory approval in Canada and $2.0 million upon regulatory approval of ESTRASORB in one of the five European countries listed above. We are also entitled to receive royalties on future sales of ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB outside the United States.

      The Amended Agreements also have a change of control provision. The provision allows King several options in the event of a change in control at Novavax including, (i) terminating our right to co-promote King products, (ii) terminating our rights to promote ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB and any other hormone therapies for women for which King is paying 50% of the development costs or (iii) requiring Novavax to assign and transfer to King all related rights of ownership for ESTRASORB and ANDROSORB and any such other hormone replacement therapies for women and license to King on an exclusive and perpetual basis all related intellectual property rights and know how. If King chooses to exercise its rights under clause (ii) or (iii) above, King will have to pay royalties on net sales of the products. In addition, King will have to pay for the cost of manufacturing plus a markup consistent with the terms of the license agreement for the handling cost.

      In January 2001, we also acquired the rights to AVCTM Cream and Suppositories (“AVC”) from King for approximately $3.3 million in cash. The AVC product line generated $3.5 million in revenue in 2001.

Fielding Pharmaceutical Company

      In December 2000, Novavax acquired privately owned Fielding Pharmaceutical Company (“Fielding”), based in St. Louis, Missouri, whichMissouri. Fielding sells, markets and distributes a proprietary line of pharmaceutical products focused on women’s health. Novavax will operate Fielding as a wholly owned subsidiary. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, Novavax acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Fielding. The purchase method of accounting was used to account for the transaction.

      The total purchase price and related expenses of $38.7 million consisted of $18.5 million in Novavax common stock, (2,312,501 shares), $13$13.0 million in cash, $5$5.0 million payablepaid in cash or common stock to the former owners of Fielding (due March 2002),in January 2002, $1.1 million in assumed liabilities and $1.1 million in transaction costs.

      The aggregate consideration of $38.7 million was allocated to cash ($1.7 million), accounts receivable and inventory ($1.2 million), property and equipment ($300,000)275,000) and goodwill ($35.5 million).

      The operating results of Fielding have been included in the consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date. The following summary represents pro forma results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 1998. These pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only

F-11


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
3.  Acquisitions — (Continued)
  Fielding Pharmaceutical Company — (Continued)

and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually resulted had the combination been in effect and are not intended to be indicative of future results.

             
Year ended December 31,

200019991998



(amounts in thousands,
except per share information)
Revenue $12,843  $12,750  $5,767 
Net loss  (13,602)  (3,824)  (9,408)
Loss per share applicable to common stockholders  (.64)  (.23)  (.64)

Biomedical Services Laboratory

      OnIn August 10, 1999, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets (excluding cash and accounts receivable) of the Biomedical Services Laboratory (“BSD”BSL”), a division of DynCorp of Reston, Virginia. In addition, DynCorp entered into a five-year non-competition agreement. The research and development activities of BSDBSL are conducted in a leased 12,000 square foot leased facility located in Rockville, Maryland. BSDBSL is engaged in contract research, development and pilot manufacturing of human vaccines for government laboratories and other vaccine companies.

      The purchase method of accounting was used to account for the transaction. The total purchase price and related expenses of $860,000 consisted of $740,000 in cash, $60,000 in assumed liabilities and $60,000 in transaction costs.

      The aggregate consideration of $860,000 was allocated to property and equipment ($170,000) and goodwill and other intangible assets ($690,000).

      Property and equipment consists primarily of laboratory equipment that the Company believes will continuehas continued to be used in the operations of BSD.BSL. Other intangible assets included patents, workforce and favorable lease terms in an approved Food and approved FDADrug Administration facility. Goodwill

F-13


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and other intangible assets are being amortized over their useful lives of five years.1999
3.  Product Agreements and Acquisitions — (Continued)
  Biomedical Services Laboratory (Continued)

      The operating results of BSDthe AVC Product Line, Fielding and BSL have been included in the consolidated statementstatements of operations from the acquisition date. The following summary represents pro forma results of operations as if the acquisitionacquisitions had occurred at the beginning of 1998.1999. These pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually resulted had the combinationcombinations been in effect and are not intended to be indicative of future results.

         
Year ended
December 31,

19991998


(in thousands, except
per share information)
Revenue $3,597  $3,037 
Net loss $(4,484) $(4,798)
Loss per share applicable to common stockholders $(.31) $(.57)

F-12


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      Pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
31:
         
20001999


(in thousands,
except per share
information)
Revenue $14,098  $17,100 
Net loss  (13,689)  (3,475)
Loss per share applicable to common stockholders  (.64)  (.21)

4.  Supplemental Financial Data

  Property and Equipment

      Property and equipment is comprised of the following at December 31:

               
2000199920012000




(in thousands)(in thousands)
Construction in progress and deposits on machinery $1,422 $ 
Machinery and equipment $2,226 $1,433  2,772 2,029 
Leasehold improvements 703 428  1,086 835 
Furniture and fixtures 101 63 
Computer software and hardware 269 166 
 
 
  
 
 
 3,030 1,924  5,549 3,030 
Less accumulated depreciation (1,103) (871) (1,223) (1,103)
 
 
  
 
 
 $1,927 $1,053  $4,326 $1,927 
 
 
  
 
 

      Depreciation expense was $353,000, $232,000 $183,000 and $152,000$183,000 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

F-14


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1998, respectively.1999
4.  Supplemental Financial Data — (Continued)

  Goodwill and Intangible Assets

      Goodwill and intangible assets consist of the following at December 31:

               
2000199920012000




(in thousands)(in thousands)
Goodwill — Fielding Acquisition $35,590 $35,590 
Goodwill — Biomedical Services Acquisition $542 $542  542 542 
AVC — Product Acquisition 3,332  
Non-Compete — Biomedical Services Acquisition 148 148  148 148 
Goodwill — Fielding Acquisition 35,590  
Patents 2,525 2,454  2,525 2,525 
 
 
  
 
 
 38,805 3,144  42,137 38,805 
Accumulated Amortization (1,239) (877) (4,375) (1,239)
 
 
  
 
 
 $37,566 $2,267  $37,762 $37,566 
 
 
  
 
 

      Amortization expense was $3,136,000, $362,000 and $199,000 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

  Accrued Expenses

      Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31:

         
20001999


(in thousands)
Accrued clinical trial expenses $900  $90 
Accrued acquisition costs  897    
Accrued compensation  759   126 
Accrued operating expenses  618   65 
Accrued interest  26    
   
   
 
  $3,200  $281 
   
   
 
         
20012000


(in thousands)
Operating expenses $2,469  $618 
Employee benefit and compensation  1,082   759 
Property and equipment  554    
Interest  232   26 
Clinical trial expenses     900 
Acquisition costs     897 
   
   
 
  $4,337  $3,200 
   
   
 

      As of December 31, 2001, the Company has accrued for $554,000 of construction in progress additions which was accounted for as a non-cash transaction in its Statement of Cash Flows.

5.  Convertible notenotes

      On December 19, 2000, Novavax entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“King”) whereby it agreed to issue to King 4% senior convertible promissory notes in the aggregate amount up to $25.0 million. On that same date, the Company issued a 4% senior convertible promissory note to King for $20.0 million in principal. On September 7, 2001, the aggregate amount of $25.0 million. On that same date, Novavax entered intoCompany issued a second 4% senior convertible promissory note to King for $5.0 million in principal. These notes are convertible into Novavax common stock at $10.00 per share or 2,500,000 shares.

      On September 7, 2001 the Company entered into a second Note Purchase Agreement with King and issued a third 4% senior convertible promissory note to King for $20.0$5.0 million in principal dueprincipal. The third note is convertible into common stock at $13.87 per share or 360,490 shares.

      All of the notes, which total $30.0 million, mature on December 19, 2007 with interest payable in semi-annual installments on June 30 and December 31. Up to 50% of the interest may be paid in common stock of

F-13F-15


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 19981999
 
5.  Convertible notenotes — (Continued)

installmentsthe Company, subject to certain conditions. The conversion prices on June 30 and December 31 commencing on June 30, 2001. Upall the notes represent an 18% premium to 50% of the interest due may be paidtrailing 20-day average stock price prior to the agreed upon lock in dates. Each note has a conversion feature, which allows us to convert the notes to common stock of the Company. A second promissory note of $5.0 million is due to be executed when the Company files a New Drug Application for its ESTRASORB product which is expected to occur during 2001.

      The first note is convertible into common stock at $10.00 per share or 2,000,000 shares. The note has a mandatory conversion from January 2002 through December 31, 2004 if the closing price of Novavaxour common stock exceeds 180% of the conversion price of the note for 60at least 30 trading days in any period of 45 consecutive trading days. The noteAfter December 31, 2004, the notes can be redeemed by the Company at 102%, 101% and 100% of face value during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

      For the year ended December 31, 2001 we made cash interest payments of $720,000 and accrued an additional $232,000 for interest expense which will be paid in our common stock. The notes and related agreements also have covenants which require the Company to obtain written approval from King prior to entering into transactions, above defined limits, to secure additional indebtedness, or acquire additional product lines or businesses. In addition to the covenants, the notes have a change in control provision as well. In the event of a change of control, the Company will be required to repurchase the notes at 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest within sixty days of the change in control.

6.  Stockholders’ Equity

      In January 2000, the Company closed a private placement of 2,813,850 shares of its Common Stockcommon stock to accredited investors (the “2000 Private Placement”). The issuance price of the Common Stockcommon stock was $4.00 per share. Each share was sold together with a non-transferable warrant for the purchase of .250.25 additional shares at an exercise price of $6.75. The related warrants have a three-year term. Gross proceeds from the 2000 Private Placement were $11,255,400. The Company issued non-transferable warrants to the Placement agent, fees were approximately $675,000, which was paid in cash. Additionally, non-transferable warrants for the purchase of 281,385 shares of the Company’s Common Stock,common stock, with an exercise price of $6.75 per share and a three-year term, were issued toterm. In addition, the placement agent. OtherPlacement agent received fees of approximately $675,000. The Company incurred other costs connectedin conjunction with the 2000 Private Placement including legal, stock exchange listing and registration fees, wereof approximately $80,000. Net proceeds to the Company from the 2000 Private Placement were approximately $10.5 million.

      In April 1999, the Company entered into Stockstock and Warrant Purchase Agreementswarrant purchase agreements for the private placement of 1,651,0001,651,100 shares of its Common Stockcommon stock to certain accredited investors (the “Private“1999 Private Placement”). One of the principalsA principal of one of the accredited investors is also a director of the Company. The issuance price of the Common Stockcommon stock was $2.50 per share. Each share was sold together with a non-transferable warrant for the purchase of .250.25 additional shares at an exercise price of $3.75. The warrants have a three-year term. Placement agents’ fees were approximately $215,000, which waswere paid with cash of $107,000 and 42,933 shares of the Company’s Common Stock,common stock, which were issued together with non-transferable warrants for the purchase of 10,733 shares of the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock at an exercise price of $3.75. These warrants have a three-year term. Additionally, non-transferable warrants for the purchase of 143,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock,common stock, with an exercise price of $3.00 per share and a three-year term, were issued to the placement agents. Other costs connected with the 1999 Private Placement including legal, stock exchange listing and registration fees, were approximatelyapproximated $67,000. Net proceeds to the Company from the 1999 Private Placement were approximately $4.1$4.0 million.

      In 1998, the Company closed on a private placement of 6,500 shares of Series A Custom Convertible Preferred Stock, $1,000 par value per share (the “Preferred Stock”), at an aggregate purchase price of $6.5 million. During 1998, $1,522,000 of the original shares were converted into 1,043,956 shares of Common Stock, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Preferred Stock. In October 1998, the Company repurchased the outstanding Preferred Stock for approximately $4.9 million. The Company incurred placement agent and other transaction fees relating to the placement, conversion and repurchase of the Preferred Stock of $502,000, which are included in the accompanying financial statements as preferred stock offering costs. Per the terms of the Preferred Stock, the Company was required to pay the holders of the Preferred Stock dividends of $225,000. This amount was paid in cash and shares of common stock.

F-14


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
6.  Equity — (Continued)

      The 1998 preferred stock transactions are summarized as follows:

     
(in thousands)
Private sale of preferred stock, net $4,415 
Deemed dividend of preferred stock  1,583 
Conversion or preferred stock  (1,439)
Accretion of offering costs  420 
Repurchase of preferred stock  (4,979)
   
 
  $ 
   
 

7.  Stock Options and Warrants

1995 Stock Option Plan

      Under the Novavax 1995 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), options may be granted to officers, employees and consultants or advisors to Novavax and any present or future subsidiary to purchase a maximum of 6,000,0008,000,000 shares of Novavax common stock. The recent amendments to the Plan increases the number of shares that can be granted from 6,000,000 to 8,000,000, subject to stockholder approval in May 2002. Incentive options, having a maximum term of ten years, can be granted at no less than 100% of the fair market value of Novavax’s stock at the time of grant and are generally exercisable in cumulative increments over

F-16


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
7.  Stock Options and Warrants — (Continued)

several years from the date of grant. Both incentive and non-statutory stock options may be granted under the Plan. There is no minimum exercise price for non-statutory stock options.

      The 1995 Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”) providesprovided for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of Novavax Common Stock.common stock. The exercise price per share is the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Options granted to eligible directors are exercisable in full, beginning six months after the date of grant and terminateexpire ten years afterfrom the date of grant.grant date. All options available under the Director Plan have been granted.

      Such options cease to be exercisable at the earlier of their expiration or three years after an eligible director ceases to be a director for any reason. In the event that an eligible director ceases to be a director on account of his death, his outstanding options (whether exercisable or not on the date of death) may be exercised within three years after such date (subject to the condition that no such option may be exercised after the expiration of ten years from its date of grant).

F-15      Activity under the 1995 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Director Stock Option Plan was as follows:

                  
1995 Director Stock Option
1995 Stock Option PlanPlan


WeightedWeighted
AverageAverage
Stock OptionsExercise PriceStock OptionsExercise Price




Balance, December 31, 1998
  3,114,247  $3.53   440,000  $3.66 
 Granted  1,078,500   3.80       
 Exercised  (226,537)  2.20       
 Expired or canceled  (577,757)  4.28       
   
   
   
   
 
Balance, December 31, 1999.
  3,388,453   3.58   440,000   3.66 
 Granted  1,019,500   7.62   60,000   5.63 
 Exercised  (485,728)  3.87   (80,000)  3.25 
 Expired or canceled  (28,040)  3.75       
   
   
   
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2000
  3,894,185   4.60   420,000   4.02 
 Granted  1,227,601   9.47       
 Exercised  (668,980)  3.18   (70,000)  3.95 
 Expired  (52,400)  4.95       
   
   
   
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2001
  4,400,406   6.17   350,000   4.03 
   
   
   
   
 
Shares exercisable at December 31, 1999
  2,386,499   3.43   440,000   3.66 
   
   
   
   
 
Shares exercisable at December 31, 2000
  2,278,428   3.48   420,000   4.02 
   
   
   
   
 
Shares exercisable at December 31, 2001
  2,282,578  $4.41   350,000  $4.03 
Available for grant at December 31, 2001
  1,184,663             

F-17


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 19981999
 
7.  Stock Options and Warrants — (Continued)

      Activity under the 1995 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Director Stock Option Plan was:

          
1995 Stock1995 Director
Option PlanStock Option Plan


Balance, December 31, 1997
  3,203,558   310,000 
 Granted at weighted average price of $4.03 per share  501,000   140,000 
 Exercised at weighted average price of $2.06 per share  (124,419)   
 Expired or canceled at weighted average price of $3.74 per share  (465,892)  (10,000)
   
   
 
Balance, December 31, 1998
  3,114,247   440,000 
 Granted at weighted average price of $3.80 per share  1,078,500    
 Exercised at weighted average price of $2.20 per share  (226,537)   
 Expired or canceled at weighted average price of $4.28 per share  (577,757)   
   
   
 
Balance, December 31, 1999
  3,388,453   440,000 
 Granted at weighted average price of $7.50 per share  1,019,500   60,000 
 Exercised at weighted average price of $3.79 per share  (485,728)  (80,000)
 Expired or canceled at weighted average price of $3.75 per share  (28,040)   
   
   
 
Balance, December 31, 2000
  3,894,185   420,000 
   
   
 
Price range $0.01 to 10.63  $1.94 to 5.81 
Weighted average exercise price $3.87  $3.24 
Exercisable  2,278,428   420,000 
Available for grant:        
 December 31, 2000  810,664    

      InformationThe following table provides certain information with respect to stock options outstanding at December 31, 2000 is as follows:2001:

                          
Number ofWeighted AverageWeightedNumber ofWeighted AverageWeighted
OptionsRemainingAverageOptionsRemainingAverage
OutstandingContractual LifeExercise PriceOutstandingContractual LifeExercise Price






Options issued at below market value:Options issued at below market value: Options issued at below market value: 
$0.01 402,430 5.0 $0.01 $0.01 281,937 4.0 $0.01 
Options issued at market value:Options issued at market value: Options issued at market value: 
$1.21 to 3.50 747,971 5.5 $3.07 $1.17 to 3.49 443,952 4.8 3.06 
$3.51 to 4.50 1,428,284 6.8 $3.79 $3.50 to 6.99 2,165,595 6.3 4.72 
$4.51 to 6.50 1,008,500 7.0 $5.70 $7.00 to 9.32 1,441,400 8.8 8.77 
$6.51 to 10.63 727,000 9.2 $8.32 $9.33 to 11.65 417,522 9.6 10.36 
 
   
 
 
 
 4,314,185 6.8 $4.52   4,750,406 7.1 $6.01 
 
   
 
 
 

      Novavax makes no chargesThe following table provides certain information with respect to operations in connection with employee stock options grantedexercisable at December 31, 2001:

          
Number ofWeighted Average
Options ExercisableExercise Price


Options issued at below market value:        
 $0.01  281,937  $0.01 
Options issued at market value:        
 $1.17 to 3.49  443,326   3.06 
 $3.50 to 6.99  1,542,897   4.58 
 $7.00 to 9.32  351,918   8.30 
 $9.33 to 11.65  12,500   10.63 
   
   
 
   2,632,578  $4.36 
   
   
 

      For the fair market value at the date of grant. With respect to options which were granted below fair market value at the date of grant,years ended December 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company recordsrecorded stock compensation expense for the difference between the fair market value at the date of grant$0, $5,000, and the exercise price, as the options become exercisable. $5,000, $10,000, and $9,000 related to such options has been included as compensation expense in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

      Pro forma information regarding net loss and loss per share is required by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and has been determined as if Novavax had accounted for its employee and director stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

F-16


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
7.  Stock Options and Warrants — (Continued)

      The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because NovavaxNovavax’s employee and director stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

F-18


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
7.  Stock Options and Warrants — (Continued)

      For purposes of pro forma disclosures below, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the option’s vesting period. Novavax’s pro forma information follows:

                      
Year ended December 31,Year ended December 31,


200019991998200120001999






(in thousands)(in thousands)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders:Net loss applicable to common stockholders: Net loss applicable to common stockholders: 
As reported (in thousands) $(12,191) $(4,506) $(7,045)As reported (in thousands) $(9,745) $(12,191) $(4,506)
Pro forma (in thousands) $(14,609) $(6,430) $(7,983)Pro forma (in thousands) $(15,525) $(14,609) $(6,430)
Basic and diluted loss per share:Basic and diluted loss per share: Basic and diluted loss per share: 
As reported $(.64) $(.31) $(.57)As reported $(.43) $(.64) $(.31)
Pro forma $(.77) $(.44) $(.64)Pro forma $(.68) $(.77) $(.44)
Risk-free interest ratesRisk-free interest rates 6.0% 5.8% 6.0%Risk-free interest rates 5.0% 6.0% 5.8%
Expected life in years:Expected life in years: Expected life in years: 
Employees 6.0 6.0 6.0 Employees 6.0 6.0 6.0 
Directors 3.0 3.0 3.0 Directors 3.0 3.0 3.0 
Dividend yieldDividend yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Dividend yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
VolatilityVolatility 80% 69% 105%Volatility 58% 80% 69%
Weighted average remaining contractual life in yearsWeighted average remaining contractual life in years 6.8 6.8 6.7 Weighted average remaining contractual life in years 7.1 6.8 6.8 
Weighted average fair value at date of grantWeighted average fair value at date of grant $5.87 $3.56 $1.21 Weighted average fair value at date of grant $5.58 $5.87 $3.56 

      The Company has entered into agreements to receive advisory and consulting services from several individuals, four of whom serve on the Novavax Scientific Advisory Board. Non-qualified stock options have beenwere granted toin prior years, for which the Company recognized compensation expense for these individuals under the 1995 Stock Option Plan.

  Common Stock Warrants

      In connection with the October 1996 private stock sale, the Company provided the underwriter warrants for the purchase of 50,000 shares of common stock. The warrants are fully exercisable at $3.75 per share and expire in October 2001. After giving effect to the anti-dilution provision, the warrants were revised to allow for the purchase of 54,924 shares at $3.54 per share. In November 1996, in consideration for services performed by a consultant, the Company also issued warrants for 50,000 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable at $5.00 per share and expire in November 2001. In March 1997, Novavaxthe Company privately placed 1,200,000 shares of common stock. As part of the transaction, Novavaxwe also granted warrants to purchase an additional 600,000 shares at a price of $6.00 per share and 600,000 shares at a price of $8.00 per share. After giving effect to the anti-dilution provision, the warrants were revised to allow for the purchase of 659,090 shares at $5.46 per share and 659,090 shares at $7.28 per share. The warrants had a three-year term and were exercised in March 2000 for cash of $3.6 million and a “cashless” exercise of 465,410 shares of common stock, which were placed into treasury shares.

      In April 1999, Novavax privately placed 1,651,100 shares of common stock. Asthe Company entered into the 1999 Private Placements, and as part of the transaction, Novavax alsowe granted warrants to purchase 412,775 additional shares at an exercise price of $3.75. TheIn addition, the placement agent for this transaction was given

F-17


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
7.  Stock Options and Warrants — (Continued)

warrants to purchase 10,733 additional shares at $3.75 and 143,000 additional shares at $3.00. After giving effect to the anti-dilution provision, the warrants were revised to allow for the purchase of 448,087 shares at $3.54 per share and 151,299 shares at $2.84 per share. These warrants have a three-year term and expire in April 2002. As of December 31, 2000, 136,2042001, 260,021 of thesethe $3.54 warrants had beenand all of the $2.84 warrants were exercised. After giving effect to the anti-dilutive provisions of these warrants, the warrants outstanding were revised to allow for the purchase of 394,410 shares at $3.54 per share and 59,772 shares at $2.84 per share.

      In connection with the 2000 Private Placement the Company granted warrants to purchase an additional 703,462703,460 shares at an exercise price of $6.75. In addition, warrants of 251,385281,385 shares were issued to the placement agent at an exercise price of $6.75 per share. The warrants have a three year term. As of December 31, 2000, 35,1272001, 464,284 of these warrants have been exercised.

F-19


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999

7.  Stock Options and Warrants — (Continued)

  Common Stock Warrants (Continued)

      Information with respect to warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at December 31, 20002001 is as follows:

         
Number of
WarrantsExerciseExpiration
OutstandingPriceDate



54,924 $3.54   October 2001 
50,000 $5.00   November 2001 
394,410 $3.54   April 2002 
59,772 $2.84   April 2002 
919,720 $6.75   January 2003 

        
1,478,826        

        
           
Number of
WarrantsExerciseExpiration
OutstandingPriceDate



 188,066  $3.54   April 2002 
 520,561  $6.75   January 2003 
 
         
 708,627         
 
         

8.  Employee Benefits

      The Company hasmaintains a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan, (the Plan), pursuant to which employees who have completed ninety days of employment with the Company as of specified datesservice may elect to contribute to the Plan, in whole percentages, up to 15% of their compensation andon a tax deferred basis up to the maximum contribution of $10,500, $10,500 and 10,000 in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.amount permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, as amended.

      The Company matches 25% of the first 5% of compensation contributed by the participantparticipants deferral and $4.00 per week of employment during the year. At the option of the Company matching contributions to the Plan401(K) retirement plan can be made in the form of the Company’s common stock. All contributions to the 401(k) Plan are immediately vested. The Company has recorded charges to expenses related toexpensed approximately $35,000, $28,000 and $16,000 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

9.  Income Taxes

      Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the Plan of approximately $28,000, $16,000 and $23,000 in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.following at December 31:

          
20012000


(in thousands)
Net operating losses $13,540  $12,513 
Research tax credits  1,464   1,229 
Disqualifying stock options  673   673 
Alternative-minimum tax credit  94   94 
Equipment and furniture  34   44 
Intangibles from acquisition  184   12 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  47   19 
Accrued vacation pay  52   28 
Deferred revenues  1,496   40 
   
   
 
 Total deferred tax assets  17,584   14,652 
Deferred patent costs  (544)  (602)
   
   
 
 Total deferred tax liabilities  (544)  (602)
 Net deferred tax assets  17,040   14,050 
Less valuation allowance $(17,040) $(14,050)
   
   
 
Deferred tax assets, net      
   
   
 

F-18F-20


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 19981999

9.  Income Taxes

      Deferred tax assets (liabilities) included in the balance sheets consist of the following:

         
20001999


(in thousands)
Net operating losses $12,513  $8,420 
Research tax credits  1,229   1,024 
Disqualifying stock options  673   671 
Alternative-minimum tax credit  94   94 
Equipment and furniture  44   51 
Intangibles from acquisition  12   15 
Deferred patent costs  (602)  (626)
Accrued vacation pay  28   28 
Deferred revenues  40   290 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts  19    
   
   
 
   14,050   9,967 
Less valuation allowance $(14,050) $(9,967)
   
   
 
Deferred tax assets, net      
   
   
 
 — (Continued)

      The differences between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate are as follows:

            
2000199920012000




Statutory federal tax rate (34)% (34)%  (34)% (34)%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit (5)% (4)%  (3) (5)
Disqualifying stock options 0% 3% 
Research and development credit (2)% (8)%  (3) (2)
Alternative-minimum credit 0% (1)%   0 
Other 1% (1)%  9 1 
Change in valuation allowance 40% 45%  31 40 
 
 
  
 
 
    % %
 
 
  
 
 

      Realization of net deferred tax assets at the balance sheet dates is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income, which is uncertain. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance was recorded against these assets as of December 31, 20002001 and 1999.2000.

      Novavax has recorded no net benefit for income taxes in 2001, 2000 1999 and 19981999 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements due to the uncertainty regarding ultimate realization of certain net operating losses and other tax credit carryforwards.

      Federal net operating losses and tax credits available to the Company are as follows:

     
2000

(in thousands)
Federal net operating losses expiring through the year 2020 $32,400 
State net operating losses expiring through the year 2015  37,142 
Research tax credits expiring through the year 2020  1,229 
Alternative-minimum tax credit (no expiration)  94 
     
2001

(in thousands)
Federal net operating losses expiring through the year 2021 $35,060 
State net operating losses expiring through the year 2021  35,060 
Research tax credits expiring through the year 2021  1,464 
Alternative-minimum tax credit (no expiration)  94 

F-1910.  Commitments and Contingencies

      Novavax leases manufacturing, laboratory and office space, machinery and equipment and automobiles under non-cancelable operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through January 2007. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2001 are as follows:

     
Operating
YearLeases


(in thousands)
2002 $2,611 
2003  2,431 
2004  2,212 
2005  1,909 
2006  1,886 
Thereafter  150 
   
 
  $11,199 
   
 

      Aggregate rental expenses approximated $1,050,000, $411,000, and $299,000 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

F-21


NOVAVAX, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2001, 2000 1999 and 19981999

10.  Commitments and Contingencies

      Novavax leases laboratory and office space, machinery and equipment under capital and non-cancelable operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through 2006. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2000 are as follows:

     
Operating
YearLeases


(in thousands)
2001 $781 
2002  598 
2003  509 
2004  370 
2005  377 
Thereafter  165 
   
 
  $2,800 
   
 

      Aggregate rental expenses approximated $411,000, $299,000, and $219,000 in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. — (Continued)

      In connection with one of the leaseleases for office and laboratory facilities, the Company is required to maintain a “Net Asset Value” of $2.0 million. The term “Net Asset Value” is defined as the difference between the total assets and the total liabilities. If the Net Asset Value falls below $2.0 million, the Company is required to provide other reasonable financial assurances to the landlord within five days of the landlord’s request.

11.  Subsequent Event

      The Company has entered into several purchase commitments related to scaling-up of manufacturing capacity. The Company entered into a construction agreement to build-out approximately 20,000 square feet of leased space to manufacture and package ESTRASORB. The fee for the construction is a cost plus fee with a guaranteed maximum price of no more than $6.6 million. In January 2001,addition to the construction agreement, the Company signed a co-promotion agreement with King for the distributionhas entered into agreements to purchase machinery and equipment to manufacture and package ESTRASORB totaling approximately $2.0 million. To date, progress payments of one of the Company’s products in the United States. Additionally, the Company and King will combine U.S. sales efforts to begin co-promoting one of King’s products that is already on the market. The Company also paid King $3.3approximately $1.4 million for the rights to a product that King hashave been marketing.made.

F-20F-22